natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1.2 In its opinion, the Commission explained how the complaint had been dealt with by it and regre ed that there had been a certain delay in so far as informing the complainant was concerned. According to the Commission, the complainant was finally informed by a le er sent on 8 August 2002.
Styrelsen tilldelade B-I sex sektioner (danska, tyska, grekiska, engelska, spanska och franska), B-II enska och portugisiska) och B- a beslut utan inv fulla ansv y ningen av elever som e interna dri en av systemet.
The Commission noted that it had considered that this explanation justified the difference in treatment between holders of a Swedish social security number and persons who did not have such a number.
Klagandens kommentarer till kommissionens detaljerade y rande o kommer a hi a en as i diskussionerna med ara barnens och de
2.3 The Ombudsman considered that the complainant had thus submi ed a further allegation.
Under behandlingen av de problem uppkommer a beslut. Det a problem.
The Commission had the opportunity to comment on this further allegation in its opinion on the Ombudsman’s proposal for a friendly solution.
Ombudsmannens bedömning av kommissionens detaljerade y rande
The Commission may thus decide to close a case if it comes to the conclusion that there is no such infringement or where it considers that there is no Community interest in pursuing it because national courts or authorities would be be er placed to deal with the ma er.
Med beaktande av aa nansierar Europaskolorna och som undertecknade 1994 ention om deras stadgarkommissionens ansvar inkluderar kommissionens den fullt a ansvar ansvar a altningssed vid Europaskolorna och uppfylla de a ansvar i framtiden.
It is thus this reasoning which has to be examined here.
I si detaljerade y rikta garantera a y ningen av elev
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN erv
The Commission itself points out that a “personnummer” is given to every Swedish citizen and to every foreigner residing for more than one year in Sweden.
Ombudsmannen kommer a ande kommissionens ansv altningssed vid Europaskolorna igheterna. En y
This means that nationals of other EU member states who do not stay in Sweden for more than one year (such as students) do not obtain a “personnummer”.
Ombudsmannen kommer akommissionens ansv ande altningssed vid Europaskolorna i enlighet igheterna.
In order to constitute discrimination on the grounds of nationality, the relevant measure does not have to benefit all nationals of the member state concerned.108
DISKRIMINERING AV TELEKOMFÖRETAG PÅ GRUND AV NATIONALITET SAMT EU:S KONKURRENSBEST
Fourth, and most important, Telia is of course entitled to protect itself against the risk that customers might not pay their invoices.
Beslut i klagomål 1045/2002/GG mot Europeiska kommissionen telefonabonnemang hos
The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.
I siv juli 2000, den erige, de a trots y18 oktober 2000 och den 18 november 2001).
The Ombudsman made a drarecommendation that, in future competitions, Parliament should inform candidates in the notices of competition that the names of successful candidates will be made public.
I ljuset av de G D Konkurrens hade a behandla e stort antal andra fall inom telekomsektorn.
The Ombudsman therefore considered it his duty to make a Special Report on the ma er.
Den 8 augusti skickade kommissionen klaganden eskriligt sv5 september mo agit svaret.
By le er of 25 February 2003, the President of the European Parliament informed the Ombudsman that Parliament had accepted the Ombudsman’s recommendation to publish the lists of successful candidates in competitions and to indicate this in all notices of competition.
Klagandens kommentarer ade klaganden ahan hade mo agit kommissionens skrivelse av den 8 augusti 2002 och han konstaterade a ansedet vklaganden var de er a kommissionen inte .
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e de i Sv Om kommissionen skulle acceptera T a strida mot tanken bakom EU:s .
3.6.2 The Council of the European Union
skydda sig, till exempel a
THE COMPLAINT
OMBUDSMANNENS FÖRSÖK ATT
The complainant described them as follows:
Förslaget till vänskaplig förlikning
1 a full list of all commi ees and working parties in the European institutions in which representatives of the Council and/or the Member States take part, including lists of their members;
Enligt artikel 3.5 i ombudsmannens stadgar107 en v a ar aeringen a Telias strategi verkade motiverad, kommissionens beslut a
2 lists of those who, in the year 2000, received travel expenses and/or daily allowances from the Council or the Member States for a ending meetings at the European institutions;
Europeiska kommissionen bör ompröva det klagomål som den erhållit från klaganden.
As regards the first type of document, the Council informed the complainant that he can find a list of members a ending each Council meeting in the press releases published immediately a er each meeting.
Det svenska personnumret tilldelas alla svbosaer e antal siff identifi ta reda a ningen
As regards the third type of document, the Council sent the following:
Numret anv Genom aobetalda skulder
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e arbetar i Sverige har epersonnummer.
– document 7594/00 concerning the effect, form and scope of the act;
elia, vid tecknandet av e ny abonnemang, ha relevanta uppg i kopia av abonnentens ID-kort. De ena arande abonnenten. T a abonnemang per telefon.
– document 7184/01 concerning the treatment of sensitive documents;
000 SEK a belopp v as (333 det sy e som etelefonlinjen).
– document 8002/01, containing legal draing remarks.
Huvudsy et med skyldigheten a uppge personnummer (eller aadriva in sina fordringar i andra medlemsstater.
The Council gave as its reason for withholding these legal opinions that their release would undermine the protection of internal legal advice to the Council as provided for in Article 4 (2) of Regulation 1049/2001 and that, in the absence of any specific reasons pointing to a particular overriding public interest in disclosure, the Council had concluded that, on balance, the interest in protecting internal legal advice outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
Telias a ityd resulterade i en a v indirekt diskriminering av icke-svenska medborgare, ee er ee a anta a kunden inte skulle Telia i realiteten gjorde sig skyldigt till missgynnande anta a de a var fallet om den presumtive abonnenten inte hade e personnummer.
The Council added that, apart from the document number and the subject of these legal opinions, the exception applies to their entire content.
Beslut e kunden i det senare fallet var tvungen a elia, och det utan a elecom och France Telecom inte v ertygande,
As regards the lists of commi ees and working groups, he stated that the information sent to him by the Council was not comprehensive or structured in such a way as to enable identification of all commi ees or working groups and their members.
Pgrundval av de uppgiaen vrekommendation till kommissionen i enlighet med artikel 3.6 i Europeiska ombudsmannens stadga:
The complainant also repeated his request for lists of those who, in the year 2000, received travel expenses and/or daily allowances from the Council or the Member States for a ending meetings at the European institutions.
Europeiska kommissionen bör ompröva det klagomål som den erhållit från klaganden.
Concerning the three legal opinions, the complainant asked for the specific grounds for refusing access.
I si detaljerade y till kommissionen var
The Council replied on 8 April 2002.
T e elias rutiner utgjorde 86 i EG- at eformellt beslut om a elia) artikel a
The Council repeated that the lists of commi ees and working groups requested by the complainant do not exist.
Denna ny vidarebefordras till T denna ny ar e rekommendation a till kommissionen.
The Council supported its position by referring to case law under the former rules on public access to documents.
Den 1 juli 2003 meddelade klaganden ombudsmannens sekretariat per telefon a han v
It is contrary to good administration that the Council has not established a list of all commi ees and working groups in the European institutions where representatives of the Council and the Member States participate.
1.1 Klaganden, en tysk medborgare, studerade i Svmed Telia, e svar han tvungen a personnummer svenskt de a var e fall av diskriminering i strid med artikel 12 i EG-november 1998 ersom sv som ingavs i juni kommissionen varken hade informerat honom om mot Sverige, trots y erligare
The list should include the names of the members of those commi ees and working groups;
Enligt kommissionen informerades klaganden slutligen genom en skrivelse som skickades den 8 augusti 2002.
The Council’s opinion made, in summary, the following points:
Beslut i klagomål 341/2001/(BB)IJH mot Europaparlamentet informera klaganden, som deltog i e agningsprovet.
Regulation 1049/2001 concerns only existing documents.
Ombudsmannen riktade emed kommande u agningsprov, i meddelandet om u agningsprov off
Where the institution concerned asserts that a document does not exist, there is a presumption that this assertion is correct.110
I si detaljerade y rande antog Europaparlamentet inte entydigt de Europaparlamentet angav inte heller i sidetaljerade y rande akommer a
This presumption may be rebu ed by relevant and consistent evidence, which in the present case has not been brought forward.
I en skrivelse av den 25 februari 2003 informerade Europaparlamentets talman ombudsmannen om a Europaparlamentet hade antagit ombudsmannens rekommendation aoff agningsprov och a a agningsprov.
The complainant does not put forward any arguments why, as a ma er of good administration, the Council should establish the lists requested.
Hela texten till den särskilda rapporten fi nns tillgänglig på:h p://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/special/pdf/en/010341.pdf
In fact, the Council does keep a list of its own preparatory bodies.
3.6.2 Europeiska unionens råd
The list is publicly available on the Internet and was sent to the complainant.
Sammanfa ning av beslut i klagomål 1015/2002/(PB)IJH och kommentar till klagomål 1542/2000/(PB)(SM)IJ H mot Europeiska unionens råd
This list, together with the public register of documents, enables the citizens to make specific requests for documents submi ed to those commi ees and working groups.
1 er samtliga kommi éer och arbetsgrupper i de europeiska , inklusiv éer eller arbetsgrupper,
The Council fails to see the need for it to keep lists of other commi ees or working groups which have nothing to do with its work and in which representatives of the Member States participate.
han kunde fi nna en som off er vrubriken ”Utdrag ur den interinstitutionella katalogen – v em inom Europeiska unionen”. er kommi éer
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN och arbetsgrupper som v
Keeping complete and up-to-date lists of all the participants would therefore pose a heavy administrative burden.
, a al av faktiska utgi er sedan styrkande handlingar har uppvisats.
The Council repeated its earlier statements to the complainant.
4.2 i intresset av a skydda intern e erv
Access to legal opinions
ÅRSRAPPORT FÖR 2003
This view does not prejudice the individual examination of each document, with a view to determining whether disclosure is in fact likely to undermine one of the interests protected by the exceptions provided for, taking into account notably the possibility of granting partial access.
Den 7 februari kommi éer och arbetsgrupper uppgav han avkommia sliga y randena bad klaganden om specifi v arade den 8 april er kommi éer ersom kommi éernas och ning o a er mo agarna av traktamenten existerar inte helleraltning iak ogs och a betalning av traktamenten granskas av a en.
The Council’s opinion was forwarded to the complainant with an invitation to submit observations if he so wished.
BESLUTEFTEREN uppgav a eervdet aktuella fallet, avser beredning av lagtexter sliga y randen, som i till
No observations were received.
P grundval av ov ande er samtliga
The dra recommendation
1 altningssed akommi éer och arbetsgrupper i de europeiska éer och arbetsgrupper.
Decisions following an inquiry
Genom e beslut av den 27 mars 2003 skickade ombudsmannen e
In response to the complainant’s application and confirmatory application, the Council took the view that the exception applied to the entire content of the three legal opinions in question: documents 7594/00, 7184/01 and 8002/01.
7594/00, 7184/01 och 8002/01. I si y
In its opinion on the present complaint, the Council states that its general position does not prejudice the individual examination of each document and that, upon re-examination, the Council decided to grant partial access to documents 7594/00 and 7184/01.
7594/00 och varje enskilt dokument och a7184/01 ead granskning.
Opinions given in the context of possible future court proceedings are analogous to a communication between a lawyer and a client.
se Yl a gstii enlighet med artikel allvarligt
They should therefore normally be exempt from disclosure under Article 4 (2) of Regulation 1049/2001.
(EG) nr 1049/2001, kan visa a e off det inte fi e off ning och adet
Applying the above distinction to the present case, it appears that documents 7184/01 and 8002/01 are opinions on dralegislation and that the legislative process concerned has reached a conclusion.
7184/01 4.2 andra strecksatsen i och 8002/01, om inte eeller fl
The Council’s detailed opinion
Rådets detaljerade y rande
The Council therefore abstained from commenting on the substance of the dra recommendation.
I si detaljerade yy ning, skulle omfa as av de undantag sligt
The Council’s detailed opinion was forwarded to the complainant with an invitation to submit observations if he so wished.
(EG) nr arande v T-84/03, Maurizio Turco mot rådet en rande vidarebefordrades till klaganden med en uppmaning aeventuellt .
No observations were received.
Inga kommentarer mo ogs.
List of commi ees and working groups
Förteckningen över kommi éer och arbetsgrupper
1.1 The complainant alleges that it is contrary to good administration that the Council has not established a list of all the commi ees and working groups in the European institutions where
Klaganden aaltningssed a at er samtliga kommi éer och arbetsgrupper i de europeiska institutionerna éer och arbetsgrupper.
Decisions following an inquiry representatives of the Council and the Member States participate.
Beslut e heller kunnat visas a det skulle fi nnas einformation.
Lists of recipients of allowances
Förteckningar över bidragsmo agare
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN a a er de personer som mo
Access to legal opinions
Tillgång till rä sliga y randen
3.1 The complainant alleges that the Council wrongly rejected his application for access to opinions of the Council Legal Service.
3.2 Av de anledningar som redovisas ovrekommendation som innebar a
3.2 For reasons explained above, the Ombudsman made a dra recommendation that the Council should reconsider the complainant’s application and give access to documents 7184/01 and 8002/01,
7184/01 och 8002/01, om inte e eller fl en T-84/03, Maurizio (EG) nr 1049/2001. Ombudsmannen
The Ombudsman therefore has to consider whether to make a Special Report to the European Parliament.
Europaparlamentet redan har informerats om ombudsmannens
Against this background, the Ombudsman considers that it would not be appropriate to make a further Special Report and that no further inquiries in the present case are therefore justified. ed.
Mot denna bakgrund anser inte ombudsmannen a det skulle v erade.
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
Inga y erkar vara motiv
On 10 June 2003, the European Ombudsman informed the Commi ee on Petitions of the European Parliament of the fact that proceedings have been brought in the Court of First Instance (Case T84/03, Maurizio Turco v Council) which raise the same issue of legal principle as the special report: that is to say, the correct interpretation of Regulation 1049/2001 as regards Legal Service opinions on dra legislation.
Den 10 juni 2003 informerade Europeiska ombudsmannen Europaparlamentets utskotalan hade v en T-84/03, Maurizio Turco mot rådet) och ade
Page 201
BESLUTEFTEREN
ANNUAL REPORT 2003
(EG) nr 1049/2001 v y till lagsti ning.
Decisions following an inquiry
Mot bakgrund av denna information beslutade utsko inte utarbeta e en
OWNINITIATIVEINQUIRIES BY THE OMBUDSMAN
OMBUDSMANNENS UNDERSÖKNINGARPÅEGETINITIATIV
REMEDIES AVAILABLE IN TENDER PROCEDURES
MÖJLIGHET TILL ÖVERKLAGANDE I SAMBAND MED ANBUDSFÖRFARANDEN
Decision in own initiative inquiry OI/2/2002/IJH concerning the European Commission
Beslut som avslutar undersökningen på eget initiativ OI/2/2002/IJH beträffande Europeiska kommissionen
In the course of dealing with a complaint made by an unsuccessful bidder in a tender procedure
I samband med aombudsmannen behandlade eanbudsgivare i e
, the Ombudsman became concerned that the remedies available to such persons might not be adequate.
1351/2001/(ME)MF, avslutat genom beslut av den 17 februari 2003.
The Ombudsman also noted that Article 56 of the (subsequently replaced) Financial Regulation provided as follows:
… medlemsstaterna är skyldiga a , vad gäller den upphandlande myndighetens beslut innan kontraktet ingås - i vilket den upphandlande myndigheten beslutar med vilken av de anbudsgivare som deltagit i anbudsförfarandet den skall ingå kontrakt - i samtliga fall tillhandahålla e prövningsförfarande genom vilket klaganden kan utverka undanröjande av det beslutet, om förutsä ningarna för de a är uppfyllda oberoende av möjligheten a erhålla skadestånd när kontraktet har ingå s.113 i artikel 56 i den (sedermera ersa a)
When concluding contracts for which the amount involved is equal to or greater than the threshold provided for by the Council directives on the co-ordination of procedures for the award of public works, supplies and services contracts, each institution shall comply with the same obligations as are imposed upon bodies in the Member States by those directives.
När kontrakt ingås som omfa ar e belopp som är lika sort som eller större än det tak som anges i rådets direktiv om samordning av förfarandena för tilldelning av off entliga arbets-, leverans- eller tjänstekontrakt, skall varje institution uppfylla samma skyldigheter som de som gäller för organen i medlemsstaterna enligt samma direktiv.
The implementing measures provided for in Article 139 shall include appropriate provisions to that end.
Genomförandeåtgärderna som anges i artikel 139 bör omfa a lämpliga föreskri er i det sy et.
The Ombudsman therefore asked the Commission to inform him whether a review procedure exists and, if not, whether the Commission is prepared to introduce such a procedure rapidly.
ge anbudsgiv fall av huruvida det fanns eskulle vara beredd a
THE INQUIRY
BESLUTEFTEREN
The Commission’s opinion was, in summary, as follows:
I ljuset av domen i
1351/2001/(ME)MF, closed by decision dated 17 February 2003.
Kommissionen kommer a a a era hundra) och den tid de . Mot bakgrund av de a kommer kommissionen a antalet offoff a off entliga som skall introduceras vid den tidpunkten.
The Ombudsman’s request for further information
Ombudsmannen uppmanade dessutom kommissionen a arna skulle kunna utnyja
A er sending holding replies on 1 and 14 April 2003, the Commission sent the following further comments on 3 July 2003:
E er a april 2003, skickade kommissionen erligare kommentarer den 3 juli 2003:
The Commission has adopted a Communication se ing up a procedure to inform all bidders or candidates of the award decision in the public procurement procedures covered by Article 105 of the
115 anbudsgivomfa as av artikel 105 i den ny er om en arna a en detaljerad motivbeslut. (Kommissionen skickade med en kopia av meddelandet tillsammans med si y rande).
Review procedures available to bidders in tender procedures
Prövningsförfaranden tillgängliga för anbudsgivare i upphandlingsförfaranden
1.1 The Ombudsman was concerned that possible failure by the Commission to provide bidders in its tender procedures with a review procedure of the kind foreseen in the Alcatel judgement116 could be maladministration.
1.1 aerbjuda anbudsgiv som anges i Alcatel-domen116 ar fallet, huruvida honom om huruvida det fanns ekommissionen skulle vara beredd a
Communication from the Commission. COM(2003)395 final (03.07.03).
Kommissionens meddelande: KOM(2003) 395 av den 3 juli er det a e
The Commission’s Communication of 3 July 2003
Kommissionens meddelande av den 3 juli 2003
2.1 The Commission informed the Ombudsman that it had adopted, on 3 July 2003, a Communication117 in response to the owninitiative inquiry.
2.1 Kommissionen meddelade ombudsmannen aden, som svinitiativ den 3 juli 2003, antagit e meddelande117.
The procedure applies to contract awards covered by Article 105 of the Financial Regulation.118
dessa har a etilldelningsbeslut innan kontraktet vidta
The Ombudsman notes the following as the main elements of the procedure:
2.2 ecka, skall den are, via arje anbudsgivare eller post, fax eller e-post, om a i varje enskilt fall.
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN ara skrilig och inges via post, fax eller omfa a de karakteristiska egenskaperna och de relativ aren.
Each tenderer or candidate is notified individually and the reasons why the bid or application has not been accepted are specified in each case; for instance by taking up, in a concise but explicit form, details contained in the award decision.
Slutligen anges a ur aren skulle dra sig och inte tilldela er tilldela en annan anbudsgiv aren om det eckor e den upphandlande myndigheten kan: kontraktet ning, har undertecknats, utan a a arna inkomna ant information som mo as
It will also be stated that additional information about the reasons for rejection of the bid or application can be obtained in response to a request sent in writing, by mail, fax or e-mail.
- skjuta upp undertecknandet av kontraktet medan en ymotivunder de tveckor som anges ovunder den perioden.
It will also be pointed out that the contracting authority may:
Ombudsmannen anser a vidta erkar sliga anta a tilldelningsbeslutet och a
Communication from the Commission COM(2003)395 final (03.07.03) Procedure for informing candidates and tenderers, a er a contract has been awarded and before the actual contract has been signed, in respect of public procurement contracts awarded by the Commission under Article 105 of the Financial Regulation.
Kommissionens meddelande: KOM(2003) 395 av den 3 juli er det a e
The Ombudsman therefore understands that the procedure established by the Communication applies to all contract awards that fall within the thresholds of the Directives.
Enligt denna artikel skall direktiven om off entlig upphandling av leveransera direktivens miniminormer.
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e kontraktet undertecknats.119 kommissionen, i samband med sina Alcateldomen till anbudsgivadministrativ
101 of the Financial Regulation121 and to Article 149 of the Implementing Rules122 as the legal basis.
121 och till artikel artikel slig grund.
Possibility of an additional non-judicial review procedure
Möjligheten till e y erligare prövningsförfarande utom domstolarna
3.2 The Commission replied that it has not considered it necessary to provide a non-judicial remedy to tenderers, because amongst other reasons, the procedure laid down in its Communication of 3 July 2003 will allow tenderers to seek an effective judicial remedy against the contracting authority’s award decision.
3.2 Kommissionen svarade aden inte hade ansedet varna, esom beskrevs i kommissionens meddelande av den 3 juli 2003 kommer a erbjuda anbudsgivarna effektiv ektiv
3.3 The Ombudsman notes that the relevant judgement of the Court of Justice requires “a procedure whereby an applicant may have [an award] decision set aside if the relevant conditions are met.”
3.3 Ombudsmannen konstaterar a”eförfarande varigenom en anbudsgivare kan undanröja e[tilldelnings-] beslut om de relevanta villkoren är uppfyllda
The Ombudsman takes the view that the Commission is not obliged also to establish a non-judicial remedy and therefore finds no maladministration in the Commission’s decision not to do so.
Ombudsmannen anser inte a er de kommissionens beslut a a administrativbeslut om atilldela e kontrakt. E
The Commission’s code is annexed to its rules of procedure: 2000 OJ L 308/26.
-211/02, Tideland Signal Ltd mot kommissionen, [2002] ECR II-03781.
Conclusion
Slutsats erbjuda anbudsgiv