natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
He pointed out that the le er of 16 January 2002 clearly stated that his application had not been successful.
(EG) nr 1049/entuellt inte ersom de avser situationen innan
In its reply of 8 May 2002, the Commission repeated the points made in its le er of 13 March 2002.
Omfa ningen av kommissionens undersökning enligt artikel 226
The complainant wrote a further le er on 2 April 2002, in which he stated that the advertisement of vacancy had created legitimate expectations to be chosen for the post. He also stated that he had been informed that another candidate had been appointed.
Beslut i klagomål 1536/2002/OV (konfidentiellt) mot Europeiska kommissionen agningsprovet COM/A/2/02 som organiserades av agningsprov uppgavs a erforderlig universitetsexamen e er september a vara efall av
On 18 June 2002, the complainant made a complaint to the Commission under the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, which was acknowledged by the Secretary General and registered under reference number A/330162.
augusti han a kravet i meddelandet om u agningsprov, aersitetsexamen agningsprovet tidigast i september 1997, utgjorde efall av
The Director General of DG MARKT replied to this complaint on 4 September 2002.
Kommissionens y rande agningsprovet COM/A/2/02, som
He confirmed the information given in the le er of 13 March 2002 and pointed out that no SNE had been recruited in Unit D/1 of DG MARKT following the notice of vacancy of September 2001.
I siy rande uppgav kommissionen aoff entliggjordes i EUT den 25 juli ar den 27 september 2002.
The Director General apologised again for the fact that the complainant had only received a standard le er informing him that his application had not been successful.
I punkt II.2 i meddelandet om u agningsprov angavs a agningsprovet e er den
In his reply of 12 November 2002, the Secretary General of the Commission stated that, although he could accept that some deficiencies had occurred in the handling of the concerned procedure, they had been rectified by the explanation given to the complainant later on.
ande krav agningsprov agningsprovet (dvs. e agningsproven ersom er avslutade studier i direkt anknytning till de olika v
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN alternativt villkor i u er grundexamen, utan det kan vara en del av en komple erande utbildning inom .
SNEs are funded from Budget line A-7003. Each Directorate General is allocated a budgetary envelope which it manages in a decentralised manner.
u agningsprov ade till arekrytera A. Kravet as, ningskategorierna vill ombudsmannen angav i sina slutsatser i punkt 428/98/JMAkommissionen ha ny.
In his observations, the complainant basically maintained his complaint.
E ersom u agningsprovet var en parallell till u agningsprovet COM/A/1/02 kunde alla som inte agningsprovet COM/A/1/02.
The reason for this is that the whole DG uses the same ADONIS system, that is to say the same system of registration numbers.
1.3 i EG:s lagsti nner sig i likartade situationer inte behandlas olika om det inte fi nns en rimlig motivering27
1.4 The inspection of the Commission’s fi le carried out by the European Ombudsman’s services has not revealed any elements that would call into doubt the Commission’s explanations.
1.6 specialistexamen kan delta i u agningsprovexamen eller specialistexamen inom de senaste fem respektivu agningsprov arande klausul v re rikta in si a
No wri en decision by the Commission concerning the decision not to fi ll the post of SNE was found in the Commission’s file.
Beslut i klagomål 1753/2002/GG (konfidentiellt) mot Europeiska kommissionen ombudsmannens i sin helhet. Den komple nns webbplats: h p://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/decision/en/021753.htm
3.2 In its opinion, the Commission underlined that the publication of a SNE vacancy cannot create a legitimate expectation on the part of applicants that they will be appointed.
Kommissionen informerade klaganden om ainte kunde beviljas, eskulle off e off2001 och a ersom (EG) nr 1049/ uppfylla de procedurregler som anges i beslut 2001/a si beslut.
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
UNDERSÖGNING
On the basis of the Ombudsman’s inquiries into this complaint, there appears to have been no maladministration by the European Commission.
Man skulle faktiskt a utgjort e fall det skulle v dra slutsatsen a fall bidra till a liknande situationer erligare
ACCESS TO MARKED EXAMINATION SCRIPTS IN COMPETITIONS ORGANISED BY THE COMMISSION
Ombudsmannen anser därför a kommissionen borde granska dessa procedurregler.
Decision on complaint 324/2003/MF against the European Commission
Motsvarande regler som antogs av rådet genom dess beslut av den 29 november 2001 om
Decisions following an inquiry the errors he had made.
Beslut e ändring av rådets arbetsordning30
By email dated 16 January 2003, the complainant informed the Commission that he had requested the copy of his marked exam paper and that he only received the copy of his wri en tests without any corrections.
(och framför allt artikel 2.1 i bilaga III som genom beslutet lades till i rådets arbetsordning) skulle kunna utgöra en användbar vägledning i sammanhanget.
On 7 February 2003, the complainant lodged a complaint with the European Ombudsman.
EUROPEISKA KOMMISSIONENS BEHANDLING AV EN ANSÖKAN OM ATIONERAD NATIONELL EXPERT
THE INQUIRY
Beslut i klagomål 172/2003/IP mot Europeiska kommissionen utstationerad nationell expert.
The European Commission’s opinion
I september 2001 skickade Europeiska kommissionens GD Inre marknaden ut till kommissionens aror”.
The opinion of the European Commission on the complaint was, in summary, as follows:
I en skrivelse daterad den 16 januari 2002 informerades klaganden om aavslagits.
The Commission acknowledged that, in a le er from President Prodi dated 7 December 1999 sent to the European Ombudsman, it had commi ed itself to give candidates access to their own marked examination scripts on request, in competitions published a er 1 July 2000.31
I skrivelsen sades a ”vi har skickat ut Er meritförteckning till generaldirektoratet, men dessvärre har Er ansökan inte varit framgångsrik. Vi kommer emellertid a spara Era uppgi er under e år”.
The Commission
UNDERSÖGNING
The procedure adopted consisted in the draing of a provisional evaluation sheet containing the remarks and the proposed marking of each examiner for each part of the tests.
Den 11 februari (i) a redovisa motiven till beslutet a ii) a meddela honom namnet iii) a
The Selection Board then set the final mark, added its own assessment on the evaluation sheet and signed it. Such an evaluation sheet could be disclosed to candidates on request.
I si svar av den 13 mars 2002 uppgav kommissionen a skrivelsen som skickades den 16 januari 2002 hade v deras uppgi er skulle sparas under e inget urv det inte v a inte a kommissionen i
Following the wri en tests, all the examination scripts were corrected anonymously by two examiners at least, in accordance with criteria established beforehand by the Selection Board.
Den 2 april skrivelsen av den 16 januari 2002 klart hade ange aklaganden innebar det a e urv kommissionen svar av else av den den 8 maj 13 mars 2002.
The Selection Board could consult this provisional evaluation sheet when preparing the assessment of the candidates.
Inre marknaden a D/1, iii) ingen utstationerad nationell iv) e ersom det ge klaganden else av den 11 februari 2002.
The assessment of the Selection Board only appeared on the evaluation sheet which was communicated to the complainant.
GD Inre marknaden beklagade dessutom aden skrivjanuari 2002 hade varit e
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e re a kommissionen hade beslutat a a .
No observations were received from the complainant.
Kommissionen v inte nationell expert.
THE DECISION
000 sade sig ha drabbats av.
The Selection Board could consult this provisional evaluation sheet when preparing the assessment of the candidates.
Klaganden vseptember 2001 av GD else om aarit informationen i denna skrivelse hade varit alts ut.
On 7 December 1999, the President of the European Commission wrote to the European Ombudsman to inform him that:
Som svelse av den 11 februari emellertid i en skrivelse av den 13 mars 2002 ge
“The Commission welcomes the recommendations you made in this report and will propose the necessary legal and organisational arrangements to give candidates access to their own marked examination papers, upon request, from 1 July 2000 onwards.” 33
Klagande skickade en y erligare skrivelse den 2 april 2002, i vilken han uppgav autlysandet han hade informerats om a inte
1.4 The European Ombudsman notes that the complainant asked the Commission to disclose his own marked examination paper.
Den 8 maj 2002 svarade kommissionens ansv ade elsen av den 13 mars 2002.
On 10 January 2003, the Commission sent to the complainant copies of his wri en paper and of the evaluation sheet.
De tillade dessutom a kommissionen inte var bunden av a ha utlyst en ledig befa ning.
The Selection Board wrote its comments relating to its assessment of the examination paper of the complainant on this evaluation sheet.
Den 18 juni 2002 ingav klaganden e ades av generalsekreteraren och registrerades med nummer Inre marknaden besv4 september 2002.
The European Ombudsman is not aware of any rule that would oblige the Selection Board to write its comments relating to the assessment of a candidate on the examination paper. The European Ombudsman therefore considers that the position adopted by the Commission appears to be reasonable.
Han ade informationen i skrivelsen av den 13 mars a ingen utstationerad nationell expert hade rekryterats till enhet D/1 i GD Inre marknaden sedan klaganden endast hade mo agit en standardskrivelse som informerade honom om aarit upplysningen a klagandens uppgi er skulle fi nnas kvar i GD Inre marknadens databas var korrekt.
The allegation that the documents sent by the Commission, namely the evaluation sheet and the examination paper without any corrections, did not enable the complainant to know the errors he had made.
I sisvar av den 12 november 2002 uppgav kommissionens generalsekreterare a en om han er skickats till klaganden.
In addition to the indication of
Den 15 november skickade GD Inre
Decisions following an inquiry the mark given to the complainant, the Selection Board also wrote its comments on this evaluation sheet.
Beslut e och administration av den 24 oktober Inre marknadens struktur, som resulterade i en sammanslagning av enheterna D/1 och D/2; en kopia av e G D Personal och administration till GD Inre marknaden av den 19 november kopior av skrividentiskt likadana som den skrivelse som skickades till klaganden den 16 januari 2002.
In this evaluation sheet, the Selection Board also highlighted what it seems to have considered to be mistakes or weaknesses in the examination paper.
svaret som skickats till klaganden den han inte else av den 13 mars 2002.
The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.
Enligt kommissionen v
3.1.4 The European Central Bank
UNDERSÖGNING elser hade samma registreringsnummer tvelserna hade lagts fram i e
Decision on complaint 1939/2002/IJH against the European Central Bank
Klagandens kommentarer det var oacceptabelt akommissionen inte hade kunnat ge en tvjanuari 2002 hade samma registreringsnummer, medan den tredje hade e annat deelserna inte var detsamma.
The complainant subsequently made a confirmatory application, which the Executive Board of the ECB rejected by le er dated 5 November 2002.
E er en noggrann granskning av kommissionens y rande och klagandens kommentarer verkade as y. I en skrivelse av den 10 november ombudsmannen kommissionen a
– the protection of the ECB’s financial interests.
GD Inre och korrespondensen mellan kommissionen och klaganden.
Decision of the European Central Bank of 3 November 1998 (ECB/1998/12), concerning public access to documentation and the archives of the European Central Bank 1999 OJ L110/30.
Inre marknaden av den utstationerad nationell expert hade rekryterats till enhet mo16 januari else med samma ordalydelse, elser. Det kan emellertid uppkomma aom flanv
In his complaint to the Ombudsman, the complainant contests the ECB’s rejection of his confirmatory application.
1.1 Inre marknaden, enhet a ror Inre marknaden i en skrivelse till kommissionens permanenta representationer i september 2001.
The complainant argues that none of the exceptions contained in Article 4 of Decision ECB/1998/12 applies to the statistics to which he claims access.
Genom en skrivelse av den 16 januari 2002 informerades han om a
Furthermore, annual banknote production figures are published on the ECB’s website.
1.2 I si y16 januari 2002 hade varit vilseledande och a den skriv
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN a dess skrivelse av den 16 januari 2002 varit vilseledande.
Furthermore, such information could undermine the security of the persons responsible for the stocks and/or involved in the transportation of banknotes.
Ombudsmannen konstaterar emellertid aa elsen av den 16 januari 2002 i skrivelsen av den 4 september 2002 och er i si y rande till ombudsmannen.
This reasoning would hold true even if information were to be made public a er the actual transportation had taken place, since certain trends can still be identified.
Klagandens begäran om a få tillgång till handlingar
In light of the above security concerns, the national central banks of the Eurosystem, which in practice manage the stocks and flows of Euro banknotes, and other parties responsible for and/or involved with stocks and transportation (e.g. police and military forces in a number of Euro area Member States) have asked the ECB to keep such information confidential. dential.
I si y rande uppgav kommissionen a GD Inre marknaden skickade samtliga handlingar november 2002, dvs. en kopia av e Inre GD PInre marknadens struktur, som resulterade i en sammanslagning av enheterna D/1 och D/2; en kopia av e G D Personal och administration till GD Inre marknaden av den 19 november kopior av skrividentiska med den skrivelse som skickades till klaganden den 16 januari 2002.
This argument would also hold true were country-specific stock data to be published a er their actual availability, because certain trends could still be identified.
2.3 skri a beslut, med undantag av de handlingar som kommissionen hade de anonymiserade kopiorna av skrivelserna
Decisions following an inquiry used for cross-border transactions.
Beslut e som klaganden hade mo agit motsvarade de skrivelser som kommissionen skickat till de andra tv
The complainant’s observations
I siy off de skulle komma a
The complainant’s observations on the ECB’s opinion made, in summary, the following points:
3.3 Mot bakgrund av ovombudsmannen inte aklaganden styrkt den skada som den vilseledande skrivelsen av den 16 januari 2002 enligt uppgi skulle ha orsakat honom.
The fourth indent concerns the protection of the ECB’s financial interests.
TILLGÅNG TILLRÄTTADE SKRIFTLIGA PROV I UTTAGNINSPROV ORGANISERADE AV KOMMISSIONEN
Therefore, the fi h indent cannot apply to them.
Beslut i klagomål 324/2003/MF mot Europeiska kommissionen
There has to be actual confidentiality within the meaning of Article 8 of Regulation 2533/98.35 For such purposes, the national central banks (NCBs) are not “reporting agents” but collectors of information pursuant to their obligations under Articles 5.1 and 5.2 of the Statute of the ESCB and ECB.
Han deltog i u agningsprovet COM/C/1/01 som off entliggjordes i EUT C 251A den 11 september 2001 och som organiserades av Europeiska kommissionen afi agningen och deltog er i de skriliga proven.
Therefore, although the information would, by its nature, allow the NCBs to be identified, it would not be confidential. dential.
I en skrivelse av den 13 december 2002 informerade kommissionen klaganden om aet, e
Even if such conclusions could be drawn, no trends could be identified because exceptional circumstances are, by definition, not subject to trends.
I e ade versionen av det skriliga proveta vilka fel han hade gjort. Den 10 januari 2003 skickade kommissionen klaganden en kopia av hans skriliga prov elser, tillsammans med utv en.
The ECB’s argument that “such information might worry the public unnecessarily and therefore lead to irrational behaviour” is a highly dangerous notion.
I ee-brev av den 16 januari 2003 informerade klaganden kommissionen om a ade prov och a han endast mo agit en kopia av siskriliga prov utan elser.
If it was accepted, there would be no limit to its application and it would substantially undermine the Declaration on the Right of Access to Information annexed to the Final Act of the Treaty on European Union.
I en skrivelse av den 29 januari 2003 svarade kommissionen ainformation avseende de skriliga proven som v
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e en och det skriliga prov
THE DECISION
Europeiska elser
Statistics about stocks and flows of Euro banknotes
Europeiska kommissionens y rande
1.1 The complainant contests the rejection by the European Central Bank (ECB) of his confirmatory application for access to statistics about stocks and flows of Euro banknotes.
Kommissionen medgav a den, i en skriv Prodi av den 7 december 1999 till Europeiska ombudsmannen, hade lovat a ade ande u agningsprov som off entliggjorts e er den 1 juli 2000.31 sliga och a ade provadministrativa arrangemang.
The complainant argues that none of the exceptions contained in Article 4 of Decision ECB/1998/1237 applies to the statistics to which he claims access.
man fyllde i en provisorisk utv arje enskild del av proven.
This could prompt the general public and retailers to hoard certain banknote denominations, thus leading to a shortage of such denominations thus creating, in effect, a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Delprov d) i u agningsprov specialkunskaper samt organisatoriska och administrativaltning och redovisning.
This argument would also hold true were country-specific stock data to be published a er their actual availability, because certain trends could still be identified. ed.
E er de skriliga provprov anonymt av minst tvu agningskommi er a
As regards the issue of security, no information on transfers of Euro banknotes can be derived from data on country-specific stocks or variations in them.
De anteckningar som gjordes av examinatorerna ovan.
If accepted, the ECB’s argument that such information might worry the public unnecessarily and therefore lead to irrational behaviour would substantially undermine the Declaration on the Right of Access to Information annexed to the Final Act of the Treaty on European Union.
U agningskommi én kunde konsultera denna provisoriska utv ersom denna provisoriska utv inte agning s kommi
The present decision therefore examines whether the ECB was entitled to refuse to supply the information which it understood the complainant to be seeking.
Sy et med dessa kommentarer var ainformera klaganden om anledningen till a u agningskommi én beslutat det fall han skulle besluta a delta i e annat u agningsprov i framtiden.
Decisions following an inquiry support the ECB’s reliance on the exception for public security in the first indent38 of Article 4 of Decision ECB/1998/12, not as a reference to its fi h indent39.
1.1 Klaganden a Europeiska kommissionen inte hade ge ade skriliga prov i u agningsprov COM/C/1/01.
The Ombudsman considers that the arguments advanced by the ECB concerning public security are reasonable and justify the ECB’s decision to refuse access to the information which it understood the complainant to be seeking.
1.2 Kommissionen asom vprovprovisoriska utvkunde konsultera denna provisoriska utv ersom den provisoriska utv agningskommi éns
The Ombudsman is aware that the concept of a self-fulfilling prophecy is used in the literature of economics.
1.3 Den 18 oktober 1999 skickade Europeiska Europaparlamentet e
1.7 For the reason given in 1.5 above, the Ombudsman considers that the ECB was entitled to refuse access to the information which it understood the complainant to be seeking.
”Kommissionen välkomnar de rekommendationer ni framför i denna rapport och kommer aföreslå nödvändiga rä sliga och organisatoriska arrangemang för a på begäran ge sökandena tillgång till sina egna rä ade prov från den 1 juli 2000.” 33
On the basis of the Ombudsman’s inquiries into this complaint, there appears to have been no maladministration by the European Central Bank. The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.
Påståendet a de handlingar som kommissionen skickat, nämligen utvärderingsblanke en och provet utan rä elser, inte gjorde det möjligt för klaganden aförstå vilka fel han gjort.
Decision on complaint 1117/2003/GG against the European Court of Auditors
2.2 Europeiska kommissionen uppgav au agningskommiden utv agning s kommi utv
In June 2003, the complainant, a UK citizen, wrote to Mr R., a member of the Court of Auditors, in order to ask for access to documents in relation to an audit carried out in 2001 in Niger.
2.3 E er en granskning av den kopia av utvtill honom konstaterade Europeiska ombudsmannen a utv en som kommissionen skickat en ve
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e agningskommid).
C 295 page 1).
Europeiska v
Where appropriate, the applicant shall be asked to formulate the application in greater detail.
Mot bakgrund av ov ombudsmannen slutsatsen a det inte verkar
In his complaint to the Ombudsman, the complainant made the following allegations:
TILLGÅNG TILL STATISTIK ÖVER EUROSEDELAR I LAGER OCH I OMLOPP
(1) The Court’s refusal to grant access to the relevant documents was in breach of the relevant rules, namely Regulation No 1049/2001 and Article 23 of the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour.
Beslut i klagomål 1939/2002/IJH mot Europeiska centralbanken ade klaganden si centr
THE INQUIRY
2.4 i ombudsmannens stadgar, e ersom klaganden inte hade iak
In its opinion, the Court noted that it was clear that the complainant’s request had not been treated in accordance with the procedures laid down in Decision No 18/97.
centralbankens styrelse avslog i en skrivelse av den 5 november 2002.
No observations were received from the complainant.
-- skyddet av Europeiska centralbankens ekonomiska intressen.
THE DECISION
I si inget av de undantag som anges i artikel 4 i beslut ECB/
1.1 On 6 June 2003, the complainant, a UK citizen, wrote to Mr R., a member of the European Court of Auditors, in order to ask for access to documents in relation to an audit carried out in 2001
Europeiska centralbankens beslut av den 3 november ska centralbankens arkiv, EGT L 110/30, 1999.
Decisions following an inquiry in Niger.
Beslut e
Conclusion
Sammanfa y rande:
On the basis of the Ombudsman’s inquiries into this complaint, and taking into account the steps taken by the institution a er it was informed of the complaint, there appears to be no maladministration by the European Court of Auditors.
Europeiska centralbanken har klaganden med den allra senaste informationen om det totala antalet eurosedlar i omlopp och i lager er om den centralbankens w er om det antal eurosedlar som returneras till de nationella centralbanker som deltar i eurosamarbetet
The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.
Genom a centralbanken av al av, och i enlighet med, artikel 4 i beslut ECB/1998/12, e ersom ea skyddet av de intressen som anges i artikeln.
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN kan vara inblandade.
3.1.6 The European Convention
Mot bakgrund av ov
ACCESS TO EUROPEAN CONVENTION AGENDAS AND MINUTES
, samt andra parter med ansv centralbanken om a
THE COMPLAINT
Europeiska altningen.
In October 2002, a complaint was made to the Ombudsman on behalf of the European Citizen Action Service (ECAS) against the European Convention and the Council.
Trots de tredje part skulle av sedelveurosedlar i olika medlemsstater ka uppgi ara giltigt e er det a sedlarna eras.
The present decision deals only with the complaint against the Convention.
P grundval av centralbanken dragit den slutsatsen atill eirrationellt beteende.
The Ombudsman’s inquiry into the complaint against the Council was dealt with in a separate decision (see section 3.1.2).
Europeiska centralbanken anser dessutom ainformation som avser specifialutans eurosedlar anverskridande transaktioner.
According to the complainant, the relevant facts are, in summary, as follows:
Det europeiska systemet av centralbanker (ESCB) bygga upp ersko slager.