natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission’s services had given this information on several occasions directly to UEA via their representatives (by le ers of 14 May 2001, 20 July 2001, 5 October 2001, 24 January 2002 and during a meeting held on 11 March 2002).
Kommissionens enheter hade vid fl dessa upplysningar direkt till UEA via dess elser av den 14 maj 2001, 20 juli 2001, 5 oktober 2001, 24 januari 2002 och under eid eande kommiet av a undvika alla former av diskriminering i utformningen av platsannonser.
It had urged them to inform all the parties possibly involved, in both the private and the public sectors.
Kommissionen hade uppmanat dem a informera alla evata som den off entliga sektorn.
Article 109 reads that “the award of grants shall be subject to the principles of transparency and equal treatment. (...)”.
reglerna och principerna altning av som styr tilldelningen av bidrag, vilka fi
Furthermore, the Commission informed the Ombudsman that, on the basis of the information sent by UEA in July 2002, concerning a list of job advertisements linked to the Belgian State which appeared to be discriminatory, it registered this information as a formal complaint and the Belgian authorities would be contacted in this respect.
Kommissionen informerade dessutom ombudsmannen om a den information som UEA skickade i juli er platsannonser med anknytning till den belgiska staten vilka verkade vara diskriminerande, registrerades som e de belgiska information om eventuellt nansierades av korrigera dessa annonser.
Directorates General had sent le ers to the organisations closely connected with the institution in which they had strongly recommended them to ensure that: (i) language qualifications for any post are consistent with the actual level of knowledge required to perform the job in question; (ii) where a complete command of any language is an essential requirement for a particular post, descriptions such as “a complete command of” or “a thorough knowledge” are used in preference to “native speaker” or “mother tongue”; (iii) they apply a policy of equal opportunities in recruitment with no undue bias in favour of any linguistic or national group.
Generaldirektoraten hade skickat skrivelser till de organisationer som vtill institutionen, i vilka de i kra fulla ordalag hade rekommenderat dessa organisationer a tillse a : i) ning skulle vkunskapsnivii) anv iii) e erv kationer ”anbudsgivare påminns om a gemenskapsreglerna om fri rörlighet för arbetstagare förbjuder diskriminering på grund av nationalitet och a det är diskriminerande a kräva a en sökande skall ha e visst språk som modersmål för a komma i fråga för en viss tjänst”.
1.1 The complainant, a German consultant, alleges that the ‘EU Pillar’ failed to provide him with a contract and to pay the invoice he had sent to it.
1.1 fi nansieras helt eller delvis av Europeiska era europeiska organisationer som er kommissionen skulle: i) inoffi ciellt reserv ii) se till a iii) nansierar.
1.3 The Ombudsman considers that in the light of the explanations provided by the Commission, the la er’s position appears to be reasonable.
” kan en, och arbetsgiv era v mycket goda kunskaper i e
Page 55
I den ny nansieringen av e any18artikel och samfibehandlas i artikel 55 i den ny rande.
Decisions following an inquiry
Ombudsmannen se till a v a samt a intensifi
Decisions following an inquiry subsistence expenses.
Beslut e
1.5 On the basis of the above, there appeared to be no maladministration by the Commission as regards this aspect of the case.
STATUS FÖR FN-ADMINISTRATIONENS ”EU-PELARE” I KOSOVO
The complainant’s claim
Fakturan uppgick till
The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.
er y erligare e ade e antal dokument som ingavs a genom tv18 y
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN er ombudsmannen om a undvika komplikationer registrerades denna skrivelse som e ny.
Decision on complaint 1365/2002/OV (Confidential) against the European Commission
I si y nationernas interimistiska administrativa uppdrag 1244 av den i Kosov10 juni olika komponenter (”pelare”) som leds av olika internationella expertorgan.
When appointed in May 2000, the complainant was graded B4, which was the maximal grading foreseen by this competition.
Pelare I avvecklades i slutet av juni 2000 och har nu ersa s av en operation med ansv sliga och
According to the complainant, by being appointed to a B4 grade post, he was discriminated against for the following reasons:
Pelare III: Demokratisering och institutionsuppbyggnad, som leds av OSSE.
Decisions following an inquiry recommendation in a similar case of alleged discrimination in the grading of fishery inspectors from various competitions.
Beslut e altning av pelarens operativa budget som fi nansieras av gemenskapen.
The complainant made a complaint to the Commission on basis of Article 90 of the Staff Regulations.
(EG) nr 1080/2000 anges i artikel 1 a gemenskapen skall bidra finansiellt till ande och dri av UNMIK:s verksamhet.
On 25 May 2002 he was informed that the Commission had rejected his request for reconsidering his grading.
I enlighet med de a bidrar gemenskapen genom a fi
In its reply the Commission stated that case 109/98/ME concerned temporary agents and that there was no need for B3/B2 or B1 officials for the Euratom competition.
I bidragsavtalet mellan Europeiska kommissionen och UNMIK:s EU-pelare beskrivs EU:s bidrag altning och kontrollmekanismer.
THE INQUIRY
I artikel anges dessutom a
As a general measure, higher age limits were allowed for the Austrian, Finnish and Swedish enlargement competitions.
, vilka bidrar till dri skostnaderna altning i Kosovo, men inte ansv
In organising these competitions, it was foreseen that the majority of successful candidates would be found in the B 5/4 competitions.
EU-pelarens påstådda underlåtenhet atillhandahålla ekontrakt och abetala en faktura bevilja honom e kontrakt ars
Furthermore the
Han anser a
Commission noted that the complainant does not mention if he even applied to participate in one of the more general competitions organised at the B1 or B 3/2 levels.
Kommissionen a ”EU-pelaren” som leds av A. Bearpark, FN:s generalsekreterares altning i Kosovo (UNMIK), 1244 av den 10 juni 1999.
The Commission concluded that the complainant’s classification was correct on the basis of the competition
Kommissionen uppgialtning av pelarens dri budget, vilken fi nansieras kommissionen och UNMIK:s EU-pelare, enligt vilket EU-pelaren skall ta hela ansvaret gentemot tredje part, och underlev
The complainant stated
Ombudsmannen anser a
The complainant further observed that the “needs of the service” mentioned by the Commission for restricting the grading to B5/B4 for some enlargement competitions can not be considered as a relevant objective ground for justifying a difference in treatment.
KOSTNADER FÖR RESOR, MAT OCH LOGI FÖR SÖKANDE I SAMBAND MED UTTAGNINGSPROV
The complainant mentioned that Euratom continuously employs experienced inspectors at B1/B2 grades and that all services benefit from experienced employees.
Beslut i klagomål 1358/2002/IP mot Europeiska kommissionen
The complainant stated that the Commission had accepted the Ombudsman’s friendly solution in case 109/98/ME and agreed to re-grade the fishery inspectors, because they had an exceptionally long working experience.
Kommissionen erinrade sig a agningsprovet COM/A/9/01, er som skickades till er klagandens handlingar och informerade juli 2002.
The complainant therefore asked the Commission to do the same for him, as he had also an exceptionally long working experience.
Klaganden agningsprovpunkt I.5 i u agningsmeddelandet ombads hon ahenne med post.
Because of his relatively high age, he has been put in a particularly bad position due to the discriminatory grading policy of the Commission.
U agningskommihenne om a hon antagits till de skrideltog inte i de skriliga proven.
The claim for a higher grading than B4
211/95 som antogs den kommissionen ning av resekostnader och delta i skriliga prov i samband agningsprovet erstiger 300 kilometer
The complainant also refers to the Ombudsman’s decision in case 109/98/ME.
grundv I de a skede av u muntliga provet.
The Commission further pointed out that the parallel drawn by the complainant with the case of the three fishery inspectors cannot be considered as being comparable.
else som skickades till klaganden tillsammans med inbjudan till de skriliga proven.
See Case T-92/96, Monaco v. Parliament, [1997] ECR-SC IA-195; II-573, paragraph 54; Case T- 109/92, [1994] ECR-SC, II-105, paragraph 87.
I sina kommentarer till kommissionens y kommissionen inte agningsprov ar bosa a agningsprov
1.6 In these circumstances, the Ombudsman does not consider that the Commission’s decision on the complainant’s grading violates the principle of equality of treatment.
E rande och klagandens kommentarer framgick det a y29 januari till kommissionen. I sin skrivelse bad han institutionen yer klagandens kommentarer, i
The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.
och ariabler agningsprovet skall ske.
THE COMPLAINT
BESLUTEFTEREN
The complainant had suffered financial loss in the Lloyd’s insurance market in the UK.
Kostnader för resor, mat och logi för sökande i samband med u agningsprov
The complainant applied for public access to the le er of formal notice in accordance with Regulation 1049/2001.
Klaganden, som hade deltagit i u agningsprovet kommissionens agningsprov diskriminerade agningsproven sker
The Commission’s opinion
I siandra y liga proven i e agningsprov a kriterier som a ariabler agningsprovet sker.
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e agningsprov som v ning verkar rimligt och inte
On 5 February 2002, the complainant made a confirmatory application, arguing that there is an overriding public interest in disclosure.
Mot bakgrund av slutsatserna i punkt 1.5 i de behandla de a krav.
This clearly refers to the UK authorities’ reply, not the Commission’s le er.
PÅSTÅDD DISKRIMINERING VID LÖNEGRADSPLACERING AV KÄRNKRAFTSINSPEKTÖR
The only new feature is the need to balance the harm caused by releasing a document against the public interest in its disclosure.
Beslut i klagomål 1365/2002/OV (konfidentiellt) mot Europeiska kommissionen agningsprovet
Case T-105/95, WWF UK v. Commission, [1997] ECR II-313, point 63; Case T-309/97 Bavarian Lager v. Commission, [1999] ECR II-3217, point 46; Case T-191/99, Petrie and Others v. Commission, [2001] ECR II-3677, point 68.
(B5/B4 Euratom a B4, som var den agningsprov, ning a han utsa agning, e ersom ebredare i de nya medlemsstaterna (med erfarenhet av ekonomi/administration eller praktiskt datorarbete are sin
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e yrkande a
The Court may state that the UK has acted in breach of the Treaty provisions.
Europeiska ombudsmannens rekommendation i e ande agningsprov.
A Court judgement stating such an infringement would strengthen the complainant’s case before an English court.
Klaganden ingav e Den 25 maj 2002 informerades han om a svar uppgav kommissionen a
The replies to the Commission from the UK government will, inevitably, rely heavily on information provided by Lloyd’s.
2000, ehans yrkeslivserfarenhet placerades han i B4 niv
Furthermore, the exchanges in 1977/78 between the Commission and the UK government concerning the transposition of Directive 73/239 are now 25 years old and can hardly be secret.
I si agningsprov i samband med utvidgningen utvidgningen med Spanien och Portugal.
An alleged breach of the Directive has already been raised in the UK courts and dismissed as irrelevant.
Som en nska och svenska agningsprov majoriteten av de nnas i B 5/4-u agningarna.
This issue is res judicata, which means that it cannot be overturned other than by the Court of Justice.
Som e komplement till dessa u agningsprov organiserades mer specialiserade u, samma strategi v utvidgningen med Spanien och Portugal.
The complainant’s additional le er
, accepterade kommissionen i det fallet, som e agningen till fi
A er careful consideration of the Commission’s opinion and the complainant’s observations, it appeared that further inquiries were necessary.
Klaganden uppgav a kravde ny a garantera a erfaren inom EU.
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e beslut a
The Commission’s reply
, skulle omfa a eent och a s.
The Commission’s reply contained, in summary, the following points:
”behov agningar i anslutning till utvidgningen, inte kunde betraktas som en relev a behovet av B1/B2- ar inom Euratom.
As far as the general question regarding the possibility for complainants to comment on Member
Klaganden uppgav akommissionen accepterat ombudsmannens v109/98/ME och a omplacera fi e ersom de s i en
The complainant’s case
1.1 agning ea medlemsstaterna.
Although the Commission’s information is received from the UK authorities, not from Lloyd’s, the Commission understands the complainant’s concern that the UK authorities would rely heavily on information provided by Lloyd’s.
Ombudsmannen konstaterar aprincipen om lika behandling, vilken anges i artikel 5.3 eras objektivt19
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e en nyligen utlyst u Klaganden anser a
The Commission has received complaints from a large number of parties.
Ombudsmannen anser a erkar rimlig.
Typically, when seeking information, an official has had a lengthy telephone discussion or an extended exchange of correspondence by e-mail.
Av den information har respekterats.
The Commission has also been able to access in-house expertise on technical ma ers such as auditing arrangements and legal issues.
AVSLAG PÅ BEKRÄFTANDEANSÖKAN OM TILLGÅNG TILL HANDLINGAR I ETT ARTIKEL 226-FÖRFARANDE
When he appeared before the Commi ee on Petitions on 22 January 2003, Commissioner Bolkestein emphasised that actions for damages can only be taken at national level.
december 2001 kungarikets skickade kommissionen en skriv elsen i enlighet med eringen ae
In summary, the complainant’s observations made the following points:
I si kungarikets fi nansministerium uppge a inv skrivelsen off
The Commission’s recognition that the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 has achieved improvements to the regulatory and supervisory framework is, in effect, a feeble admission that Directive 73/239 was breached before the Act.
Ombudsmannen konstaterar a klaganden dessutom har inge s.
Preliminary remark
I si y ata inv drabbats av avsev e
1.1 The complainant’s final observations make a new allegation that the Commission is culpable for the delay in ensuring enforcement of Directive 73/239 in relation to the Lloyd’s insurance market.
73/239/EEG om andra
1.2 The Ombudsman considers that it is not appropriate to delay a decision on the present case in order to inquire into this new allegation and claim.
Den 11 januari 2002 skrev klaganden och ueav direktiv else med en formell ar off entlig handling.
Refusal of access to the le er of formal notice of 20 December 2001
Den 5 februari ervde bri iska myndigheternas svtidigare beslutet.
2.1 The complainant applied to the Commission for public access to a le er of formal notice sent by the Commission to the UK government on 20 December 2001, concerning breaches of Directive 73/239 in relation to the Lloyd’s insurance market.
Fallet Lloyd’ entuell som utv erka denna utredning arande ny lagsti iska fi nanslagsti ningen i enlighet med 2000 nansiella Act 2000”.
The complainant contests the Commission’s refusal to release the le er and argues that the UK Treasury has stated that it has no objection to the le er being made public.
Kommissionen har inte bara a direktiv har upptagits i den nationella lagsti ningen, utan snarare huruvida den nationella lagsti garantera agemenskapens lagsti a det bri iska fi
Disclosure of documents exchanged with the UK authorities would adversely affect the conduct of this investigation. The ultimate objective is to ensure full compliance with Community law.
The Mail on Sunday av den 10 mars ”Finansministeriet, som kommer abesvara kommissionens anklagelser senast i slutet av april, förnekar adet vägrat skicka sisvar om inte sekretess kunde garanteras”.
This process requires a climate of mutual confidence that would be jeopardised by disclosing the documents related to the investigation.
De a avser helt klart de bri iska myndigheternas svar, inte kommissionens skrivelse.
The complainant’s argument that the UK Treasury does not object to disclosure of the le er of formal notice is incorrect.
Kommissionen hade dessutom bekungariket ly a sekretessen de en har i fl et av abevara sekretessen i samband med
In a judgement concerning Commission Decision 94/90 (which Regulation 1049/2001 replaced) the
Äv beslut ant, e(EG) nr 1049/2001. Det enda ny et av a balansera den den off skada som orsakas av a
Regulation 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, 2001 OJ L 145/43.
T-105/95, WWF UK mot kommissionen, [1997] ECR II-313, punkt T-309/97 Bavarian Lager mot kommissionen, [1999] ECR-191/99, Petrie m.fl. mot kommissionen, [2001] ECR II-3677, punkt 68.
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e s och om de informeras via pressmeddelanden om ae.
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
Genom av ersom de inte vet
2.6 In view of the above, the Ombudsman finds no maladministration in relation to this aspect of the complaint.
BESLUTEFTEREN kommissionen a de som klagat och ingear den bri iska regeringen v alanden.
The scope of the Commission’s Article 226 investigation
Den fortsa a vgran a off den inte skulle de offdrabbade avsiktligt missgynnas.
3.1 In an additional le er sent during the inquiry, the complainant argues that the Commission’s Article 226 investigation should deal with past irregularities, as well as current alleged breaches of the Directive.
Dessutom har den kommunikation som skedde under 1977-1978 mellan kommissionen och kungarikets regering om upptagandet av direktiv 73/239/EEG i den nationella lagsti ningen ara hemlig.
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e tillgodosedd i brikungarikets regeringen var skyldig.
The Ombudsman therefore finds no maladministration in relation to this aspect of the complaint.
E er en noggrann granskning av kommissionens ydet som om y svaret till om dea eff argument a
On the basis of the Ombudsman’s inquiries, there appears to be no maladministration by the Commission. The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.
I en skrivelse av den 6 mars 2003 bad ombudsmannen kommissionen dessutom abesvara klagandens skrivelse av den 18 februari 2003.
He therefore complained to the Ombudsman on 28 August 2002 alleging that the requirement in the competition notice to have obtained the university degree required for admission to the competition a er September 1997 constitutes age discrimination.
V domstolen22 kommentera medlemsstaternas redan klart har ange aenskilda de av den anledningen man alltid som all annan information, inklusive den information kunna komma fram till e en.
The deadline for submi ing applications was 27 September 2002.
Kommissionen anser a a sig av a as si
Decisions following an inquiry has to be obtained just a er the first diploma, but can be part of the complementary education in the framework of the professional career of the candidate.
Beslut e i den nationella lagsti ningen, e
For the basic grades the Commission is looking for recent or “fresh” knowledge.
genom tv else och en komple erande 2002. Även om kommissionens information er a s.
DECISIONSFOLLOWING
BESLUTEFTEREN inklusiv ande korrespondens via e-post.
The alleged discrimination on basis of age
, kan dessa domar likv ande Lloyd’.
The Commission observed that this “fresh diplomas” clause is a condition based on the nature of the posts to be filled.
• inklusive offi ande Lloyd’s, rapporter som utarbetats tidningar och tidskri er.
The Commission further argued that persons, who had not obtained their diploma within the last 5 years or the specialisation diploma within the last 3 years, could still be candidate for the parallel competition COM/A/1/02 that required professional experience.
Trots dess skyldighet a226 i aron av formella befogenheter a kalla via in handlingar, har kommissionen i mycket stor omfa ning kunnat styrka riktigheten i den information den mo agit.
Thus, candidates in similar situations should not be treated differently, unless there are justifiable grounds27.
Frågan om tidigare underlåtenheter ervakningen av, den
Decisions following an inquiry
Beslut e hur de ny januari ens
Since A8 officials are not deemed to have any relevant professional experience prior to their joining the Commission, the institution has set a date for the completion of their studies or specialised studies.
I sisledamot Bolkestein a spraxis ar dessutom asy ar till aoch inte a generellt konstatera a
On the basis of the Ombudsman’s inquiries into this complaint, there appears to have been no maladministration by the Commission.
Artikel a uppfylla en skyldighet enligt de Även om klaganden inte e en. kungarikets regering
The Ombudsman therefore closes the case.
Kommissionen borde avge e motiverat y
In March 2002, the complainant, an Irish citizen, applied to the Commission for access to certain documents in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001 regarding public access to European
1.1 skulle vara skyldig till a kommissionen s kommissionen skall avge e motiverat y fast a
Parliament, Council and Commission documents
Ombudsmannen anser inte a det skulle v a ny inge e ny
The Commission informed the complainant that access could not be granted since the Irish tax authorities had requested that the documents should not be disclosed.
Vägran age tillgång till skrivelsen med den formella underrä elsen av den 20 december 2001
It also put forward that, if the Commission had considered that disclosure would be harmful, it would not have consulted the Irish authorities and would have denied access.
Klaganden bestrider kommissionens vfi nansministerium har meddelat a inv skrivelsen off sv kungarikets regering till kommissionen till stor del kommer asanningen.
OJ L 145/43 of 31 May 2001.
Enligt kommissionen skulle e elsen
On the basis of the Ombudsman’s inquiries, it appears that the procedural rules adopted by the Commission in its Decision 2001/937/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 5 December 2001 amending its rules of procedure, and in particular Article 5 (4) of these rules, are not dra ed with the precision necessary to reflect the substantive provisions laid down in Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. The Ombudsman would therefore consider it useful if the Commission could review these provisions.
2.3 Ombudsmannen konstaterar aenligt artikel (EG) nr 1049/2001 skall institutionerna vdokument om ea skyddet av ”sy et med inspektioner, utredningar och revisionererv94/90 (som ersa es av en askyddet av sy et med en v a elser som skickats i samband med artikel 226-
Decision on complaint 172/2003/IP against the European Commission
2.5 nedan, anser ombudsmannen a kommissionen, mot bakgrund av ovrimligen kunde dra slutsatsen aden v igad av spraxis, arande formella ens tolkning.
The complaint concerns the Commission’s handling of an application for a post of Seconded National Expert.
(EG) nr kungarikets myndigheter anser anta undantagen erkar det osannolikt askyddandet av sy et med en era en v nner emellertid ingen vmedlemsstaten var villig aanledning avara villiga a acceptera e
By le er of 16 January 2002, the complainant was informed that his application had not been successful.
Ombudsmannen konstaterar emellertid a det relev(EG) nr 1049/”om det inte föreligger eövervägande allmänintresse av utlämnandet.”
The le er stated that “we have circulated your CV within the DG but I regret to inform you that your application has not been successful.
Ombudsmannen anser a klaganden har lyckats visa ae kontrollera korrektheten i den information ra artikel ektivitet.
However, your details will be kept on fi le for one year”.
Ombudsmannen anser a och mot bakgrund av
OJ L 313/40 of 30 November 2001.
-191/99, Petrie m.fl. mot kommissionen, [2001] ECR II-3677, stycke 68.
Furthermore, the Commission stated that the publication of a post is not binding for the institution that can decide not to fi ll the post.
2.6 Mot bakgrund av ovadministrativ else av den 20 december 2001 och a