natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Its ad-dress is: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Genom att anvênda nyckelord kunde de enkelt sûka efter redan utfûrt arbete pì det omrìde deras ansûkan avsìg.
Again in 1999, the last year of the Daphne initiative, the lessons learned through project visits, reports (including a «rstexternalevaluationreportbyanindependentteamofexpertsonthe1997 initiative) and selection and monitoring processes were built into the call for proposals and guidelines for applicants. Additionally the Daphne website, which was launched in the
Mìnga av projektansûkningarna fûr 1998 tycktes avse ny verksamhet, men en nêrmare analys visade ofta att verksamheten redan genomfûrts inom EU och ibland till och med «nansieratsvia Daphneinitiativet. Vid fûrslagsomgìngen 1999 framhûlls dêrfûr eftertryckligt att organi-
It had been noted, when project submissions for 1998 were read, that many of the projects claimed to be suggesting activities that would be attempted `for the «rsttimeever'when,infact, such activities had already been undertaken in Europe or indeed even funded by the Daphne initiative itself.
Mìl och prioriteringar sationerna innan de lêmnade projektfûrslag skulle ta reda pì vilka ìtgêrder som redan ge-nomfûrts och om mûjligt bygga vidare pì eller vidareutveckla dem sì att de kunde tillêmpas bredare inom EU eller under andra omstêndigheter.
In 1999, a number of new issues also began to emerge, however.
Frìn 1999 och framìt upprepades dêref-ter varje ìr uppmaningen att bygga vidare i stêllet fûr att innovera, men mìnga projektfûrslag tog inte heller i fortsêttningen hênsyn till tidigare erfarenheter.
In particular, the focus on raising awareness of violence against women in Europe in 1999 prompted an increase in awareness-raising projects on gendered violence in general and on domestic violence in par-ticular.
Under 1999 vêcktes ‹eranyafrìgor.Inriktningenpìmedvetandegûrandeìtgêrderavseendevìld mot kvinnor i EU ûkade antalet projekt som syftade till att ûka medvetenheten om kûns-relaterat vìld i allmênhet och vìld i hemmet i synnerhet.
Increasing public and political attention to the issue of migration into Europe, and concern that misunderstanding of this issue was giving rise to increasing discrimination and abuse of migrant people living and working in Europe, prompted a number of projects focus-ing on the rights of migrants and on support to victims of racism and discrimination.
Allmênhetens och politikernas ûkande fokusering pì immigrationen i EU och oron fûr att missuppfattningar skulle ûka diskrimine-ringen och ûvergreppen mot migranter som lever och arbetar i EU genererade en rad projekt med inriktning pì migranters rêttigheter och stûd till o.erfûrrasismochdiskriminering.
Projects on the clandestine migration of unaccompanied minors, on the rights of migrant domestic workers, on support to victims of tra/ckingandtopreventexploitationofmigrantand tra/ckedwomen,wereforerunnersofa growingnumberofprojectsthat,inthefollow-ing years, r e ‹ e c t e d a n i m po r t a n t n e w w o r k l o a d f o r N G O s a n d p u b l i c a uijt h o r i t i e s i n E u r op e .
Projekt som inriktades pì ensamstìende underìriga som invandrat illegalt, immigrerade hus-hìllsarbetares rêttigheter, stûd till o.erfûrmênniskosmugglingochfûrebyggandeavattmig-ranter och insmugglade kvinnor utnyttjas var fûrelûpare till ‹eraefterfûljandeprojektsomgav enskilda organisationer och myndigheter i EU omfattande nya arbetsuppgifter.
I m po r t a n t issues such as rape, female genital mutilation (FGM) and violence in the aftermath of cffo n ‹ i c t a l s o « g u r e d f o r t h e « r s t t i mffe a m o n g D a p h n e - f u n d e d p r o j e c t s .
Viktiga frìgor som vìldtêkt, kvinnlig kûnsstympning och vìld efter kon‹ikterfûrekomocksìfûrfûr-sta gìngen bland de projekt som « n a nffs i e r a d e s v i a D a p h nffe p r o g r a m m e t .
While Daphne projects continued, therefore, to re‹ectwellthenatureofdebateandneedsrelated to violence in Europe, some problems noted from the very beginning of the initiative persisted.
Daphneprojekten ìterspeglade alltsì vêl den o . e n t l i g a d eb a t t e nffo c h b e h o v e n i EffU n ê r d e t g ê l l e r vìldsfrìgor, men vissa problem frìn Daphneinitiativets start kvarstod.
These related mostly to project design and management, and suggested a contin-ued need for improvements in the capacity of organisations, for the Commission to continue to monitor and provide technical advice to projects, and for ongoing work in the Daphne `team' itself to draw lessons, analyse trends and develop the initiative in the light of this re‹ec-tion.
Problemen rûrde frêmst projektens utformning och fûrvaltning och tydde pì ett fortsatt behov av att ûka or-ganisationernas kapacitet, att kommissionen ûvervakade projekten och bistod med teknisk rìdgivning och att •Daphnefamiljen• fortsatte utvinna erfarenheter, analysera trender och utveckla initiativet med hênsyn till detta.
In regard to project preparation and planning, there were still weaknesses in:
Vid projektfûrberedelserna och planeringen kvarstod problem med att
‡ focusing on cause and e.ectandmatchingactionstotheproblemstheyaimedtosolve;
‡ inrikta sig pì orsak och verkan och anpassa ìtgêrderna till de problem de var avsedda att lûsa,
‡ learning lessons and knowing how to share these with appropriate groups, and in particu-lar spreading these in appropriate form and with added value in other Member States;
‡ tillvarata och dela erfarenheter med lêmpliga mottagare, sêrskilt genom spridning i lêmp-lig form med mervêrde i andra medlemsstater,
‡ using partnerships to improve coverage and e/ciency;
‡ anvênda partnerskap fûr att fûrbêttra têckningen och e.ektiviteten,
‡ using the budget to facilitate implementation and output, rather than as a simple `costing' exercise;
‡ utnyttja anslagen fûr att frêmja genomfûrande och resultat, snarare ên som kostnadsersêtt-ning,
‡ evaluating results and performance.
‡ utvêrdera resultat och e.ekter.
Many submissions remained local, with token partnerships set up purely for the purpose of satisfying the Daphne selection criteria.
Mìnga projektfûrslag var fortfarande lokala och symboliska partnerskap inrêttades enbart fûr att uppfylla Daphneprogrammets kriterier.
A large number of projects did not seem to realise
‡ projekten tog upp êmnen som hittills inte behandlats,
On a more positive note, the projects selected continued to break new ground in a number of ways:
Mìl och prioriteringar
‡ the support of the Commission opened doors for many organisations and enhanced their ability to function within their own environment and at European (and in some cases in-ternational) level.
‡ kommissionens stûd ûppnade dûrrar fûr mìnga organisationer och ûkade deras mûjlighe-ter att arbeta i sin egen miljû och inom EU (ibland êven internationellt).
`Project coordinators judge that the label ``European Commission'' was decisive to add credibil-ity to their action „team members noticed an immediate change of attitude in school au-thorities.' [External evaluation of Project 97/066/WC]
•Projektsamordnarna anser att Europeiska kommissionens insats var avgûrande fûr ìtgêrder-nas trovêrdighet ... gruppmedlemmarna mêrkte en omedelbar fûrêndring i skolmyndigheternas hìllning.• (Extern utvêrdering av projekt 97/066/WC.)
By the time the Daphne programme 2000›03 was launched in 2000, an enormous amount of new work had emerged from the three-year experience of the Daphne initiative, and the Com-mission's commitment to this work was regularly talked about in international circles.
Mycket arbete hade êgnats ìt Daphneinitiativet nêr Daphneprogrammet 2000›2003 lansera-des ìr 2000 och kommissionens engagemang i arbetet omnêmndes regelbundet i internatio-nella sammanhang.
NGO support was solid and lessons from Daphne projects found their way into conferences and workshops in other regions as lead and partner organisations `spread the word'.
Daphneprojekten hade gott stûd frìn de enskilda organisationerna och erfarenheterna luf-tades vid konferenser och workshops i andra regioner i takt med att ryktet spreds bland de ledande och samarbetande organisationerna.
The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child received a b r i e « n g o n D a p h n e i n 1 9 9 9 ; t h e f o l l o w - up r e po r t to the World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children listed Daphne as an example of good regional practice.
FN:s kommittï fûr barnets rêttigheter informe-rades om Daphne 1999. Uppfûljningsrapporten till Vêrldskongressen mot kommersiell sexu-ell exploatering av barn nêmnde Daphne som ett exempel pì gott regionalt arbete. Andan bakom Daphne beskrevs som att
‡ taking calculated risks to break new ground,
‡ ta medvetna risker fûr att bana ny vêg,
‡ learning and sharing,
‡ vinna och dela kunskaper,
‡ supporting partnerships both in projects and with the Commission,
‡ frêmja samarbetet bìde om projekt och med kommissionen,
‡ remaining focused on the victim,
‡ strêva efter att ge skyddsorganisationer, grupper och enskilda stûrre in‹ytande,
‡ seeking to empower protection structures, groups and individuals,
‡ tackla vìld pì bred front via fûrebyggande, skydd, stûd, rehabilitering och information pì grêsrotsnivì om verkligheten inom EU och nationellt.
‡ tackling violence comprehensively from the angles of prevention, protection, support, re-habilitation and in the context of grassroots-level information about European and na-tional realities, was cited as a reason for the continued support of NGOs, public authorities and other players.
Detta lìg bakom det fortsatta stûdet frìn enskilda organisationer, o.entligaorganochandraaktûrer. Kommissionens intima deltagande i projekten sìgs som ett sêllsynt exempel pì stûd som gick lêngre ên att bara tillhandahìlla medel, utan snarare yttrade sig som verkligt enga-gemang.
The Commission's close engagement with the projects was hailed as a rare example of sup-port that went beyond funding to real commitment.
Daphneprogrammet hade samma allmênna riktlinjer som Daphneinitiativet, med tre viktiga undantag. Nu omfattade programmet êven organisationer i Efta- eller EES-lênderna, pì Cy-pern, Malta eller i Turkiet.
The Daphne programme followed the general lines of the initiative, with three important in-novations: the ability for organisations from EFTA/EEA countries, central and east European countries, and Cyprus, Malta and Turkey to apply; the opening of the programme to local au-thorities as project leaders, not just partners; and the possibility of projects running for up to three years. This led to some complications.
Mìl och prioriteringar gjorde att uttagningskommittïn redan frìn bûrjan engagerades i att fûreslì fûrbêttringar av projekt som beviljats «nansiering.Medfacitihandframstìrdetsomenmycketpositivutveck-ling, eftersom uttagningskommittïn vid olika tillfêllen bestod av experter pì metodologi, forskning och datainsamling, hêlsofrìgor, rêttstillêmpning, rêttighetsbaserad programplane-ring, informationsspridning och kommunikation samt annan social programplanering.
The « r s t w a s t h a t t h e i n c l u s i o nffo f t h e nffo n - mffe m b e r S t a t e cffo u n t r i e s d e p e n d e d o n f r a mffe w o r k a g r e e mffe n t s being in place between the EU and these States, and no agreement had as yet been « n a l i s e d b e t w e e n t h e E U a n d a p p l i c a n t S t a t e s .
Utan att pìverka projektens materiella utformning kunde experterna uppmêrksamma Daphnepro-grammets projektsamordnare pì detaljer som kunde krêva en kommentar till den genomfûr-ande organisationen.
T h i s c a u s e d s o mffe cffo n f u s i o n a m o n g s t t h o s e submitting projects, since many projects went ahead and included full partners in the applicant States ̌ sometimes a clear programming imperative, especially in projects dealing with cross-border issues like tra/ckingandmigratioň andhadtobeaskedtorevisetheirprojects if they were to be recommended for funding.
De kunde ocksì fûreslì nedskêrningar av projekt som tycktes ûverstiga kapaciteten eller smêrre tillêgg som kunde ûka projektverksamhetens e.ektochtêckning.
The second innovation, the opening-up of the call to local authorities as project leaders, was straightforward and gave rise to no new challenges, although in practice local authorities were slow to come forward as project leaders rather than partners.
Den andra nyheten var att ocksì lokala myndigheter nu «ckledaprojekt.Dettagavingapro-blem eller nya utmaningar, êven om de lokala myndigheterna i praktiken var lìngsamma med att axla rollen som projektledare snarare ên samarbetsparter.
This could have seriously reduced the number of projects funded that year as, for example, one three-year project would take up the fund-ing for three one-year projects.
Budgeten fûr Daphnepro-grammets fûrsta ìr belastades med anslagen till projekt som lûpte pì ûver tolv mìnader.
This would risk discouraging applicants. As a result, it was decided to limit the number of multiannual projects in order not to seriously disadvantage those who felt that their capacity did not allow them to manage multiannual projects (for example, because the size of the organisation did not allow it to bear the burden of expend-iture against delayed reimbursement for more than one year at a time).
Som en fûljd kunde antalet «nansieradeprojekthasjunkitkraftigtdetfûrstaìreteftersometttreìrigtprojektju krêvde lika mycket «nansieringsomtreettìriga.Fûrattinteavskrêckavissasûkandebeslutademan att skêra ner antalet ‹erìrigaprojekt,sìattmanintemissgynnadedemsomintehadetillrêck-lig kapacitet fûr att fûrvalta ‹erìrigaprojekt(t.ex.organisationersomintevartillrêckligtstorafûrattligga ute med kostnader lêngre ên ett ìr i taget mot senare ìterbetalning).
The Daphne programme was as over-subscribed as the initiative had been.
Daphneprogrammet blev lika eftersûkt som Daphneinitiativet.
In the «rstyear,415 submissions were received, totalling some EUR 40 million.
Under det fûrsta ìret kom 415 ansûkningar in avseende totalt ungefêr 40 miljoner euro.
All of the activities recom-mended in the guidelines for applicants were covered in the project submissions, namely:
‡ undersûka olika former av vìld och medel fûr att fûrebygga det,
‡ measurement of the impact of di.erenttypesofviolencetoestablishappropriatere-sponse;
Dêrnêst kommer kûns- och familjerelaterat vìld (kûnsrelaterat vìld 8 %, vìld inom familjen 7 % och vìld i hemmet 11 %).
‡ assessment of measures and practices to prevent and detect violence in order to prevent future exposure to violence;
Kommissionens rapport till Europaparlamentet och rìdet om Daphneprogrammet (2000›2003) › januari 2002
‡ information campaigns to raise awareness in the public, media and/or targeted profes-sional groups;
En del projektfûrslag antogs inte eftersom de var lokala och inte utnyttjade den europeiska potentialen.
‡ the development of Community-wide information sources on the various «eldsofvio-lence;
‡ I projektrapporterna uppgavs att man inte bara sett skillnader pì problem, lûsningar och arbetsmetoder mellan medlemsstaterna utan êven likheter, vilket lett till ett berikande utbyte av metoder och verktyg.
‡ studies of di.erentaspectsofviolenceandhowtopreventthem;
•Det insamlade materialet êr relativt heterogent eftersom forskarna kom frìn olika lênder, hade olika arbetssêtt och tillêmpade metoderna utifrìn sitt eget perspektiv.
Projects covered domestic violence, sexual violence including incest, gendered violence, vio-lence in schools, psychological violence, the health impacts of violence including female genital mutilation, law enforcement and child pornography online.
‡ Potentialen fûr kunskapsûverfûring och utbyte av information, metoder och verktyg blev tydligare i takt med att organisationerna lêrde kênna varandra och bêttre fûrstod varandras situationer och behov.
They are categorised in more detail in the annex.
‡ De kunde ûverskrida sprìkbarriêrer och utveckla vad vissa projekt kallade •Daphnesprìk•, dvs. de kunde kommunicera eftersom det fanns en ûmsesidig insikt i problem och lûsningar.
Internet and child pornography are also signi«cant,with6 % of the total.'
Utsatthet êr ett begrepp som êr svìrûversatt eftersom det têcker olika semantiska (och so-ciala) omrìden som rêttssystem, utbildningsvêsende, sjukvìrd, kriminologi, barntillsyn, socialt arbete, psykologi och kulturantropologi ...
Commission report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the Daphne programme 2000›03, January 2002
Arbetsgruppens medlemmar lêrde dock via semina-rierna kênna varandra och bûrjade fûrstì varandra bêttre.• (Projekt 99/025/C)
However, those projects that did make e . o r t s t o ` b e E u r op e a n ' a c h i e v e d some success and, as monitoring visits, «nalreportsandevaluationsdemonstrated,there began to be a growing understanding of the value of truly `European' action. Projects reported that:
Mycket ìterstod att lêra om vad ett verkligt EU-projekt kunde innebêra, men redan 2000 fanns tydliga tecken pì att stûdet frìn Daphneprogrammet hjêlpt mìnga nationella och lokala or-ganisationer att vêxa till organisationer med i n ‹ y t a n d e p ì EffU - n i v ì .
‡ they were able to identify not only di.erencesbetweentheproblems,responsesandwaysof working among Member States but also points of convergence, leading to successful sharing of methodologies and tools;
Arbetet inriktades dock fortfarande pì att utveckla Daphneprogrammet frìn ett kortsiktigt «nansieringssystemtillettramverkfûrstûrrekunskaperomvìldochsêttattfûrebyggadetfûr att skydda och stûdja o . r e nffs a m t « n n a e n b r e d l û s n i n g p ì p r o b l e m e t i nffo m EffU .
`The researchers, coming from di.erentcountriesandwithdi.erentworkhabits,appliedthemethods from their own vantage point, thus the material gathered is relatively ill-assorted.
Nyckelorden fûr de sista ìren av Daphneprogrammet blev dêrfûr •vidareutveckling•, •upp-byggnad•, •anpassning• och •utvidgning•.
Despite this, these di.erenceswereanalysedateachjointmeetingandputintoperspectivewithwork habits on the one hand and with the context, reception in the «eld,reactionofauthorities,etc. on the other.' [Project 99/025/C]
Urvalskommittïns arbete inriktades pì projekt som ûkade mervêrdet i redan utfûrt arbete genom att
‡ the value of comparative analysis ̌ for example of legal frameworks relating to sexual violence ̌ enhanced understanding and the ability to advocate for review and harmoni-sation;
‡ utvêrdera och prova utfall och resultat, anpassa och gì vidare med dem,
‡ the potential for transfer of knowledge and the sharing of information, methodologies and tools was more evident as organisations got to know each other and understood better their speci«csituationsandneeds;
‡ uppdatera forskningsresultat och vidga dem till alla medlemsstater, i fûrekommande fall till kandidatlênder, lênder inom Efta eller EES (samt Cypern, Malta och Turkiet),
‡ they were able to transcend language barriers and develop what some projects called `Daphne language', i.e. communication based on common understanding of the issues and responses.
‡ gì vidare frìn undersûkningar och uppgiftsinsamling till analys och dêrifrìn till rekom-mendationer och undervisning pì EU-nivì,
`The question of translating or interpreting a concept such as ``vulnerability'' is complex in itself.
‡ bredda tillêmpningen av utbildningen, medvetandegûrande ìtgêrder och arbetsverktyg som t.ex. enkêter,
We encountered this problem when translating and adapting questionnaires, and it posed a problem even for French-speaking children.
‡ sammanstêlla och dokumentera informationsresurser via Daphne och andra kêllor (Inter-net, personer, publikationer, audiovisuellt material, utbildningsmetoder och paket m.m.).
„Vulnerability is a concept that is di/culttotrans-late as it relates to di.erentsemantic(andsocial)«elds:justice,education,medicine,criminol-ogy, protection of children, social work, psychology and cultural anthropology„However, within the team, as a result of the seminars, members became familiar with each other and began to understand each other better.' [Project 99/025/C]
Detta fûrutsatte stêrkta partnerskap, utvidgade nêtverk och stûrre kapacitet via fortsatt in-formationsutbyte och eventuella personalbesûk, mer regelbundna besûk pì fêltet i andra medlemsstater samt bêttre och mer mìlstyrda konferenser, workshops och andra arbetsmû-ten.
Although much remained to be learned about what being a `European project' entailed, there were clear signs by 2000 that many organisations had grown, as a result of Daphne support, into organisations whose impact was European rather than national or even local.
En ny fûrslagsomgìng gjordes fûr projekt som skulle utveckla utvêrderingsindikatorer, frêmja analys av bêsta arbetsmetoder och slutfûra kartlêggningen och uppgiftsinsamlingen fûr att fì en ûvergripande bild av vìldet och dess yttringar i EU.
There remained a concern, however, that the Daphne programme should not be just a short-term funding mechanism but a framework in which learning ̌ about violence and how to respond to it in terms of protection, prevention and support for victims ̌ might develop and build into a comprehensive response to this EU-wide problem.
Nêr Daphneprogrammet gick vidare blev det en verklig utmaning att slutfûra arbetet inom projekt«nansieringenstidsramarochdefûrslagsomlêmnadesinlevdeupptillkommissionenskrav pì att fûrbêttra ìtgêrderna. Stora budgetnedskêrningar gjordes och vissa organisationer utsattes nu fûr en faktisk risk att misslyckas eller inte kunna fullfûlja verksamheten.
The key words for the remaining years of the Daphne programme, therefore, became `devel-opment', `building', `adapting' and `extending'.
Kommis-sionens kontrollbesûk i projekten inriktades dêrfûr pì att hjêlpa organisationerna att fûrvalta sin budget och hitta nya sêtt att nì resultat utan att anstrênga budgeten.
The selection panel focused on projects that aimed to add value to work that had already been done, by:
Ett projekt med belgiska, spanska och italienska samarbetspar-ter valde t.ex. att framstêlla alla sina skrifter enbart pì engelska, i stêllet fûr pì nìgon av samarbetsparternas sprìk.).
‡ moving from studies and data collection to analysis and, on the basis of this, recommenda-tions and lessons at European level;
‡ Ett •bibliotek• ûver medvetandegûrande material som framstêllts inom projekten sam-manstêlldes 2002 i bìde tryckt och elektronisk form pì webbplatsen.
‡ broader application of training and education modules, awareness-raising materials, and operational tools such as questionnaires;
‡ En rad fallstudier gjordes av vilken sorts projekt som Daphne «nansierat,hurdelyckatsochvilken e.ektdehaft.
‡ compilation and documentation of resources made available by Daphne and other sources (web-based, human, publications, audiovisual, training methodologies and packages, etc.).
‡ Idïn bakom Daphne News togs upp i regelbunden e-post till alla organisationer som varit verksamma inom Daphne med information om projekt som nyligen beviljats «nansiering,om uppdatering av webbplatsen och andra framsteg.
If this were to be possible, it would also be necessary to reinforce partnerships, expand net-works and improve capacity, including through the continued exchange of information and perhaps s t a . , m o r e r e g u l a r « e l d v i s i t s i nffo t h e r Mffe m b e r S t a t e s , a n d mstu c h i m p r o v e d , m o r e t a r g e t e d conferences, workshops and other working meetings.
Projekten mìste sedan gammalt sam«nansiera20%avsinakostnaderochvidkontrollbesûkenuppmanades de att sûka fortlûpande « n a nffs i e r i n g f û r a t t k u n n a d r i v a d e n D a p h nffe « n a nffs i e r a d e v e r k s a m h e t e n vidare êven utan stûd frìn kommissionen.
There were also new calls for projects that might develop evaluation indicators, support analysis of good practice and com-plete mapping and data collection exercises so that there would exist a comprehensive picture of violence in all its forms in Europe.
Sì snart det var mûjligt delade man med sig av «nansieringsidïer.Detvardockenutmaningattordnafortlûpande«nansiering.