natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Despite a request from the Commission in February 1993, Germany did not issue recovery orders until August 1995. 
Trots en frfrgan frn kommissionen i februari 1993, upprttade inte Tyskland terbetalningskrav frrn i augusti 1995.
In August 1996 an offer was made to pay 5,1 million euro (being the value of the available assets of the German com-pany). 
I augusti 1996 erbjd man sig att betala 5,1 miljoner euro (vilket var det tyska fretagets tillgngliga tillgngar).
This was rejected by the Commission in April 1997. 
Detta avslogs av kommissionen i april 1997.
By December 1999 the assets had diminished to 1,5 million euro. 
I december 1999 hade tillgngarna minskat till 1,5 miljoner euro.
None of the subsidies totalling 43,5 million euro has been recovered. 
Inget av bidragen p totalt 43,5 miljoner euro har tervunnits.
(1) Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 of 4 March 1991. 
(1) Artikel 5.2 i rdets frordning (EEG) nr 595/91 av den 4 mars 1991.
(2) The Court of Justice ruled that Member States should respect the obligation of diligence which Ôimplies that the Member States must take steps to rectify irregularities promptlyŐ, adding that Ôwith the passage of time, recovery of sums wrongly paid is likely to become more complicated or impossible for reasons such as the fact that the undertakings may have ceased trading or accounting documents may have been lostŐ. 
(2) Europeiska gemenskapernas domstol faststllde att medlemsstaterna skall respektera kravet p omsorg vilket innebr att medlemsstaterna skall vidta de tgrder som syftar till att komma till rtta med oriktigheterna snarast, samt att det med tiden troligen blir svrare eller omjligt att terkrva felaktigt utbetalda belopp p grund av att fretagen kan ha upphrt med verksamheten och bokfringsmaterial kan ha frsvunnit.
(3) Case C-34/89 of 11 October 1990, Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities. 
(3) Ml CĐ34/89 av den 11 oktober 1990, Italienska republiken mot Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission.
C 269/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 (d) there is inadequate use of procedures to offset debts against other CAP payments which are due. 
C 269/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 4.11.2004 d) Frfaranden fr att kvitta skulder mot andra utbetalningar inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken som skall gras anvnds ibland p ett olmpligt stt.
These are calculated on the basis of the assets available to the debtor and are lower than the debt. However, even if recovery procedures were faster and recovery possibilities maximised, some debts would still have to be written off because of insolvency, death, official error, equity, cost effectiveness etc. 
Dessa belopp berknas utifrn den betalningsskyldiges tillgngliga tillgngar och r lgre n fordringen. ven om tervinningsfrfarandena vore snabbare och mjligheterna till tervinning maximerades, skulle dock vissa fordringar nd vara tvungna att skrivas av p grund av insolvens, ddsfall, tjnstemannafel, sklighet, kostnadseffektivitet, och s vidare.
It is not possible to estimate how much would be written off for these reasons. 
Det gr inte att bedma hur mycket som skulle skrivas av av dessa anledningar.
The Commission has limited powers to influence the way in which Member States carry out their responsibilities under the regulation. 
Kommissionen har begrnsade befogenheter att pverka hur medlemsstaterna uppfyller sitt ansvar enligt frordningen.
It cannot intervene in Member States, administrative or judicial procedures in order to speed them up. On the other hand: (a) the Commission can take action to recover the value of old debts from Member States, on the basis of the European Court of Justice ruling referred to in paragraph 37; (b) Community law provides an incentive to Member States to recover monies unduly paid in that they may retain 20 % of amounts recovered. 
Den kan inte ingripa i medlemsstaternas administrativa eller rttsliga frfaranden fr att skynda p dem.  andra sidan a) kan kommissionen vidta tgrder fr att tervinna vrdet av gamla fordringar frn medlemsstaterna, p grundval av det utslag i Europeiska gemenskapernas domstol som nmns i punkt 37; b) uppmuntrar gemenskapslagstiftningen medlemsstaterna att tervinna medel som betalats ut p oriktiga grunder mot att de kan behlla 20 % av de tervunna beloppen.
In view of the cumulative recovery rate of 17 % this incentive cannot be considered to have achieved its objective. 
Med tanke p att den ackumulerade tervinningsgraden r 17 % kan detta incitament inte anses ha ntt sitt ml.
OLAF does not have a reliable record of amounts retained. 
OLAF har inte ngon tillfrlitlig redovisning av de behllna beloppen.
Commission decisions on who should bear the cost of irregular payments which are not recovered: no clear principles 43. 
Kommissionens beslut om vem som skall bra kostnaden fr felaktiga utbetalningar som inte tervunnits: inga tydliga riktlinjer 43.
According to the ECR, since 1971 a total of 110 million euro has been written off against the EU budget and 142 million euro charged to Member States. 
Enligt informationen i ECR har totalt 110 miljoner euro skrivits av mot EU-budgeten sedan 1971 och 142 miljoner euro pfrts medlemsstaterna.
These amounts are small (10 %) in relation to the total amount to be recovered, partly because Member States have proposed few cases to be written off as irrecoverable and partly because the Commission action to clear up the old debts has not been timely. 
Dessa belopp r sm (10 %) i frhllande till det totala belopp som skall tervinnas, delvis p grund av att medlemsstaterna endast har freslagit att f fordringar skall skrivas av fr att de r omjliga att tervinna, och delvis fr att kommissionens tgrd fr hantering av gamla fordringar inte vidtogs i tid.
(1) Special Report No 11/2000, paragraph 101 (OJ C 215, 27.7.2000). 
(1) Srskild rapport nr 11/2000, punkt 101 (EGT C 215, 27.7.2000).
Tests were carried out on a selection of 30 cases recorded in the ECR, where the Commission had decided that the cost should be charged to Member States. 
Det gjordes en granskning av ett urval om 30 fall som registrerats i ECR, dr kommissionen hade beslutat att kostnaden skulle pfras medlemsstaterna.
The selection concentrated on pre-1996 cases as there had been no clearance-of-accounts decision on cases since that year except for the special exercise mentioned below. 
Urvalet var inriktat p fall frn fre 1996 eftersom det inte hade fattats ngot beslut om avslutande av rkenskaperna fr olika fall sedan det ret utver det srskilda arbete som nmns nedan.
Of the 30 cases examined, only three contained satisfactory evidence that the amounts had in fact been recovered from Member States (2). 
Av de 30 granskade fallen innehll endast tre tillfredsstllande bevis p att beloppen verkligen hade tervunnits frn medlemsstaterna (2).
Some 30 cases recorded as charged to the budget were also examined. 
30 fall som hade registrerats som pfrda budgeten granskades ocks.
In eight cases the files could not be found and in 15 cases there was insufficient evidence (3) that the amounts were irrecoverable. 
I tta fall kunde man inte hitta rendena och i 15 fall fanns det inte tillrckliga bevis (3) p att beloppen inte gick att tervinna.
There were reasoned arguments for decisions in few (4) of the files examined. 
Endast i f (4) av de granskade rendena fanns det underbyggda argument fr besluten.
Under the clearance-of-accounts procedure, disallowance of expenditure normally takes the form of a Ôflat-rate correctionŐ: the Commission judges that a Member State has failed to manage certain expenditure properly and disallows from EU financing (i.e. in effect charges to the Member State) a percentage of the expenditure concerned as a sanction for poor management and an incentive for improvement. 
Enligt frfarandet fr avslutandet av rkenskaperna underknns ofta utgifter genom ÓschablonrttelserÓ. Kommissionen bedmer d att en medlemsstat har misslyckats med att frvalta vissa utgifter korrekt och ger avslag p EU-finansiering av (det vill sga lter i praktiken medlemsstaten betala) en andel av den berrda utgiften som en sanktion fr dlig frvaltning och som ett incitament till frbttringar.
Some Member States have taken the opportunity of such flat-rate corrections to write off debts arising from irregularities committed in that same area of expenditure up to the value of the correction, rather than proposing writing off under the condition discussed in paragraphs 33 to 37. 
Vissa medlemsstater har vid sdana schablonrttelser passat p att skriva av fordringar som beror p oriktigheter inom samma utgiftsomrde upp till vrdet av rttelsen, i stllet fr att fresl en avskrivning p de villkor som beskrivs i punkterna 33Đ37.
The Commission considers that this practice is not in conformity with the legal provisions relating to clearance of accounts. 
Kommissionen anser att detta bruk inte fljer de rttsliga bestmmelserna fr avslutandet av rkenskaper.
Neither OLAF nor the Directorate-General for Agriculture has maintained records of such accounts written off, nor reconciled them with the amounts of the related clearance-of-accounts corrections. 
Varken OLAF eller generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk har frt register ver sdana avskrivningar eller stmt av dem mot de korrigeringar som grs vid avslutandet av rkenskaperna.
The total amount written off in this way is therefore not known. 
Det totala beloppet fr sdana avskrivningar r drfr oknt.
(2) Five files could not be found; four cases had been treated as being already covered by flat rate corrections and in one case the amount had been charged to the budget not to the Member State. 
(2) Fem renden hittades inte, fyra fall hade behandlats som om de redan tcktes av schablonrttelser och i ett fall hade beloppet pfrts budgeten och inte medlemsstaten.
(3) For example, bankruptcy or winding up orders. 
(3) Dvs. konkurs eller likvidation.
(4) There were reasoned arguments in eight of the 30 files examined. 
(4) I tta av de trettio granskade rendena fanns det underbyggda argument.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/11 49. 
4.11.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 269/11 49.
OLAF initiated a special exercise in March 1999 to examine pre-1996 amounts to be recovered. 
OLAF inledde i mars 1999 ett srskilt arbete fr att granska fordringar frn fre 1999 som nnu inte tervunnits.
Old cases were defined as cases with administrative delays exceeding four years and/or judicial delays exceeding eight years (1). 
Gamla fall definierades som fall dr det administrativa frfarandet tagit ver fyra r och/eller det rttsliga frfarandet tagit ver tta r (1).
All such cases with amounts outstanding of more than 50 000 euro were to be examined in depth. 
Alla sdana fall dr det utestende beloppet uppgr till ver 50 000 euro skulle granskas ingende.
Those less than 50 000 euro were to be subject to a less rigorous review. 
Belopp under 50 000 euro skulle ses ver mindre rigorst.
The Commission Decision (2) on these cases was published on 28 June 2003. 
Kommissionens beslut (2) om dessa fall offentliggjordes den 28 juni 2003.
The amount of 69,4 million euro was written off against the budget and 5,3 million charged to Member States. 
69,4 miljoner euro skrevs av mot budgeten och 5,3 miljoner euro pfrdes medlemsstaterna.
Italian cases, which account for 66 % (750 million euro) of the amount to be recovered for pre-1995 cases, were excluded from the recommendations and decision. 
Italienska fall, vilka svarar fr 66 % (750 miljoner euro) av det belopp som skall tervinnas fr fall frn fre 1999, undantogs frn rekommendationerna och beslutet.
No reason was given for this. Also excluded from consideration were 95 pre-1995 cases for a total value of 118,8 million euro. 
Det gavs ingen anledning till detta. ven 95 fall frn fre 1996 undantogs, med ett totalt vrde om 118,8 miljoner euro.
As was the case for recommendations made under the normal procedure, there was no systematic analysis in the files of the reasons leading to the recommendations. 
I likhet med de rekommendationer som gjordes under det normala frfarandet, fanns det i dossierna ingen systematisk analys av vilka orsaker som hade lett till att rekommendationerna gjordes.
The Commission has now set up a task force to examine pre-1999 cases for amounts in excess of 500 000 euro. 
Kommissionen har nu tillsatt en arbetsgrupp som skall granska de fall frn fre 1999 som gller belopp ver 500 000 euro.
Division of responsibilities in the Commission 52. 
Ansvarsfrdelningen inom kommissionen 52.
As explained above, OLAF manages the ECR database. 
Ssom frklaras ovan frvaltar OLAF ECR-databasen.
The Directorate-General for Agriculture is responsible for clearance-of-accounts decisions. 
Generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk r ansvarigt fr beslut om avslutande av rkenskaper.
There are instances in which this division of responsibilities causes problems of communication: (a) there was no provision for the Directorate-General for Agriculture to transmit systematically to OLAF copies of all clearance decisions whereby Member States have been charged with the financial consequences of irregularities. 
I vissa fall skapar denna ansvarsfrdelning kommunikationsproblem: a) Det fanns inga bestmmelser om att generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk systematiskt skulle verfra till OLAF kopior av alla beslut om avslutande dr medlemsstater har lagts de ekonomiska konsekvenserna av oriktigheterna.
Consequently there was no systematic evidence in the OLAF files that the amounts recorded as having been charged to Member States had actually been recovered under the clearance-of-accounts procedure; (b) the 1995 decision (3) to write off amounts against the budget was not reflected in the ECR database. 
Fljaktligen fanns det inga systematiska bevis i OLAF:s dossier p att de belopp som registrerats ssom pfrda medlemsstaterna verkligen hade tervunnits enligt frfarandet fr avslutandet av rkenskaperna. b) Beslutet 1995 (3) att skriva av belopp mot budgeten terspeglades inte i ECR-databasen.
As a result cases were examined again in 2003 and in some instances the decision was the opposite of that taken in 1995; (c) some Member States have written off amounts on the basis of OLAFŐs recommendations in advance of a Commission Decision. 
Detta ledde till att fallen granskades nnu en gng 2003 och att det i vissa fall fattades beslut som gick stick i stv med det beslut som fattades 1995. c) Vissa medlemsstater skrev av belopp utifrn OLAF:s rekommendationer innan kommissionen hade fattat beslut.
(1) This definition is derived from the judgment in European Court of Justice Case No C-34/89. 
(1) Denna definition hrrr frn domen i Europeiska gemenskapernas domstol, ml CĐ34/89.
(2) Commission Decision 2003/481/EC of 27 June 2003 (OJ L 160, 28.6.2003, p. 
(2) Kommissionens beslut 2003/481/EG av den 27 juni 2003 (EGT L 160, 28.6.2003, s.
(3) This was the last of the annual decisions dealing with cases recommended for writing off by Member States. 
(3) Detta var det sista av de rliga besluten om fall fr vilka medlemsstaterna har rekommenderat avskrivning.
Current arrangements split nominal and effective responsibility for this procedure in a way which reduces accountability. 
I gllande bestmmelser grs en uppdelning mellan formellt ansvar och verkligt ansvar fr detta frfarande p ett stt som minskar ansvarsskyldigheten.
Recommending writing off is not a function that fits well the role of a fraud investigation and coordination body. 
Att rekommendera avskrivning r inte en uppgift som lmpar sig fr ett bedrgeriutrednings-och samordningsorgan.
The Commission makes little use of its experience of irregularities 54. 
Kommissionen utnyttjar inte sin erfarenhet av oriktigheter tillrckligt 54.
Notifications to OLAF for input to the ECR were intended, amongst other things, to intensify the campaign against fraud and irregularities. 
Anmlningar till OLAF fr registrering i ECR var avsedda att, bland annat, intensifiera kampen mot bedrgeri och oriktigheter.
In this context, the Council (4) requested the Commission to develop an investigation policy based upon strategic and operational analysis of information on fraud, irregularities and recoveries reported by Member States. 
I samband med detta uppmanade rdet (4) kommissionen att utarbeta en utredningsmetod som bygger p en strategisk och operativ analys av de uppgifter om bedrgeri, oriktigheter och terbetalningar som medlemsstaterna har rapporterat.
Parliament (5) has criticised the fact that the debt arising from irregularities and fraud has built up to an unacceptable level and that the recovery procedures do not work. 
Europaparlamentet (5) har riktat kritik mot att de utestende belopp som beror p oriktigheter och bedrgeri har ntt en oacceptabel niv och att tervinningsfrfarandena inte fungerar.
It called upon the Commission to submit a detailed analysis of the causes of this problem and proposals to remedy it. 
Europaparlamentet uppmanade kommissionen att lgga fram en detaljerad analys av orsakerna till detta missfrhllande och frslag om hur det kan avhjlpas.
The Commission (6) submitted a communication on improving the recovery of Community entitlements in December 2002. 
Kommissionen (6) lade i december 2002 fram ett meddelande om frbttrad tervinning av gemenskapens fordringar.
It quotes the example that in 47 % of cases reported, the products involved were not identified, which does not facilitate risk analysis and which makes it harder to draw appropriate lessons. 
Dr nmns till exempel att i 47 % av de inrapporterade fallen hade de berrda produkterna inte identifierats, vilket frsvrar riskanalysen och gr det svrare att dra korrekta slutsatser.
It is attempting to improve the quality and timeliness of notifications by the introduction of direct input to the ECR by Member States, coupled with a programme of training courses and the provision of an ECR user manual. 
OLAF frsker frbttra kvaliteten p anmlningarna och se till att de inkommer i tid genom att ge medlemsstaterna mjlighet att direkt fra in uppgifter i ECR, samt genom att infra ett program med utbildningskurser och utforma en manual fr ECR.
(4) Council conclusions on protection of the financial interests of the Communities and the fight against fraud 13244/1/02 REV 1 of 6 November 2002. 
(4) Rdets slutsatser om skydd av gemenskapernas ekonomiska intressen och kampen mot bedrgerier 13244/1/02 REV 1 av den 6 november 2002.
(5) Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control on the Annual Report on the fight against fraud 2001, PE 315.805 of 3 March 2003. 
(5) Betnkande frn budgetkontrollutskottet om rsrapporten fr 2001 om skydd av gemenskapernas ekonomiska intressen och bedrgeribekmpning, PE 315.805 av den 3 mars 2003.
(6) COM(2002) 671 final of 3 December 2002. 
(6) KOM(2002) 671 slutlig av den 3 december 2002.
In the framework of the clearance of accounts for 1993, the Commission proposed to charge Germany 8,2 million euro for 21 cases where it considered Germany to have been negligent in its recovery action. 
Inom ramen fr avslutandet av rkenskaperna fr 1993 freslog kommissionen att Tyskland skulle pfras 8,2 miljoner euro fr 21 fall dr kommissionen ansg att Tyskland hade agerat fr-sumligt nr det gller tervinningen.
The financial correction was however not implemented because of inadequate bilateral consultation. 
P grund av bristande samrd genomfrdes dock inte den finansiella korrigeringen.
All but two of the cases were reconsidered for the 1995 decision and were charged to the EAGGF. 
Alla utom tv av fallen togs ter i beaktande fr beslutet 1995 och pfrdes EUGFJ.
The Commission has not documented the reasons for reversing its original proposal. 
Kommissionen har inte dokumenterat anledningarna till att den tog tillbaka sitt ursprungliga frslag.
C 269/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 57. 
C 269/12 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 4.11.2004 57.
However there are other weaknesses to be addressed in the design of ECR information. 
Det finns dock andra brister som br tgrdas i utformningen av ECR-informationen.
There are too many descriptions for the type of fraud and irregularities, 79 in all, some of which are ambiguous (see Table 4); the budget headings have not been entered in a consistent format and there are 46 codes for method of detection, some of which are again ambiguous (see Table 5). 
Det finns alltfr mnga beskrivningar av vad fr slags bedrgerier och oriktigheter det gller, 79 totalt sett, av vilka ngra r oklara (se tabell 4).
Type of irregularity Fictitious use or processing False or falsified commercial documents Inexact quantity False or falsified request for aid Fictitious movement Variation in quality or content Other cases of irregular documents Other irregularities Trafficking in withdrawn or stockpiled products Falsified customs documents Change of destination Non arrival at final destination Failure to respect other conditions Situation as at 31 December 2002. Table 4 Types of irregularity Value of irregularities reported (million euro) 984 379 270 208 201 169 148 120 97 91 91 91 71 Percentage of total reported value Cumulative percentage 23 23 9 32 6 38 5 43 5 48 4 52 3 55 3 58 2 60 2 62 2 64 2 66 2 68 Source: OLAF ECR database of irregularities reported under Regulation (EEC) No 595/91. 
Typ av oriktighet Simulerad anvndning Tabell 4 Typer av Vrdet p rapporterade oriktigheter (miljoner euro) 984 Procentandel av totalt rapporterat vrde 23 9 6 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 Ackumulerad procentsats 23 32 38 43 48 52 55 58 60 62 64 66 68 Ackumulerad procentsats 27 49 55 60 64 68 71 74 76 78 80 82 Falska eller frfalskade handelsdokument 379 Felaktig kvantitet 270 Falsk eller frfalskad stdanskan 208 Simulerad rrelse 201 Variationer i kvalitet eller innehll 169 Andra fall av felaktiga dokument 148 Andra oriktigheter 120 Handel med tertagna eller lagrade produkter 97 Frfalskade tullhandlingar 91 ndrad destination 91 Har ej kommit fram till slutdestinationen 74 Andra villkor har ej uppfyllts 71 Situationen per den 31 december 2002.
Table 5 Detection methods Value of irregularities reported (million euro) Detection method Percentage of total reported Cumulative percentage Documentary checks Judicial enquiry National fiscal control Routine control Accounting control EU initiative 1 137 950 253 237 180 153 126 123 92 90 85 27 27 22 49 6 55 6 60 4 64 4 68 3 71 3 74 2 76 2 78 2 80 2 82 Judicial enquiry Interservice collaboration Laboratory analysis of samples National customs control Control on the premises of the beneficiary Other 81 Situation as at 31 December 2002. 
Metod fr att upptcka Kontroll av dokument Rttslig utredning Nationell skattekontroll Rutinkontroll Kontroll av redovisning EU-initiativ Rttslig utredning Samarbete mellan tjnster Laboratorieanalys av urvalsprover Nationell tullkontroll Kontroll i stdmottagarens lokaler Tabell 5 Metoder fr att upptcka fel Vrdet p rapporterade oriktigheter (miljoner euro) Procentandel av totalt rapporterat vrde 27 22 6 6 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 vrigt 81 1 137 950 253 237 180 153 126 123 92 90 85 Situationen per den 31 december 2002.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/13 58. 
4.11.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 269/13 58.
The Court also found that there were significant errors in the data recorded in the ECR and even the absence of financial data of any kind for 91 cases (see paragraph 25). 
Revisionsrtten fann ocks att det frekom vsentliga fel i de uppgifter som registrerats i ECR och ven att det i 91 fall inte fanns ngra som helst ekonomiska uppgifter (se punkt 25).
The ECR records the identities of persons consulting the database and the number of times it has been consulted. 
I ECR registreras identiteten p de personer som gr skningar i databasen och hur mnga gnger det har gjorts skningar.
From October 2001 to September 2002 there were 11 direct consultations by Commission Directorates-General. 
Frn oktober 2001 till september 2002 hade kommissionens generaldirektorat gjort direkta skningar 11 gnger.