natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Table 1 Đ EU funding allocated to road projects, 2007-2020, (in million Ű) Source: ECA, based on Commission and INEA. 
Tabell 1 Đ EU-medel som anslagits till vgprojekt, 2007Đ2020, (i miljoner euro) Klla: Revisionsrtten, p grundval av uppgifter frn kommissionen och Inea.
9 Instrument 2007-2013 2014-2020 Total ERDF and Cohesion Fund 46 544 29 282 75 826 TEN-T 524 NA 524 CEF NA 2 060 2 060 Total 47 068 31 342 78 410 4 COM(2019) 640 final of 11 December 2019. 
9 Instrument 2007Đ2013 2014Đ2020 Summa Eruf och Sammanhllningsfonden 46 544 29 282 75 826 TEN-T 524 Ej tillmpligt 524 FSE Ej tillmpligt 2 060 2 060 Summa 47 068 31 342 78 410 4 COM(2019) 640 final av den 11 december 2019.
07 EU funding instruments are subject to different management procedures: (a) The ERDF and Cohesion Fund, are implemented under shared management. 
07 EU:s finansieringsinstrument r freml fr olika frvaltningsfrfaranden: a) Eruf och Sammanhllningsfonden genomfrs genom delad frvaltning.
The Commission (Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy) negotiates, approves and monitors implementation of the partnership agreements and operational programmes (OPs) proposed by Member States, including the assessment of conditions that Member States have to fulfil to receive EU funding (ex-ante conditionality). 
Kommissionen (generaldirektoratet fr regional-och stadspolitik) frhandlar fram, godknner och vervakar genomfrandet av de partnerskapsverenskommelser och operativa program som medlemsstaterna freslr, och bedmer de villkor som medlemsstaterna mste uppfylla fr att f EU-finansiering (frhandsvillkor).
At national or regional level, a managing authority is responsible for managing OPs, which includes project selection, monitoring and reporting on project implementation. 
P nationell eller regional niv r en frvaltande myndighet ansvarig fr frvaltningen av operativa program, vilket inbegriper val av projekt samt vervakning och rapportering om genomfrande av projekt.
In the case of major projects (those whose total eligible cost exceeds Ű75 million), the Commission approves individually the EUŐs contribution. (b) The CEF (also, formerly, the TEN-T Programme) is implemented by the Commission under direct management. 
Nr det gller strre projekt (de vars totala stdberttigande kostnad verstiger 75 miljoner euro) godknner kommissionen EU:s bidrag individuellt. b) FSE (tidigare kallat TEN-T-programmet) genomfrs av kommissionen genom direkt frvaltning.
The Commission issues calls for proposals to receive EU co-funding and evaluates them with the support of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA), under the supervision of the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport. 
Kommissionen utlyser anskningsomgngar om medfinansiering frn EU och utvrderar anskningarna med std frn genomfrandeorganet fr innovation och ntverk (Inea), som lyder under generaldirektoratet fr transport och rrlighet.
08 Besides grants, the EU supports development of the road network through financial instruments such as loans and guarantees to attract private investment in transport infrastructure, for example, the CEF Debt Instrument and the European Fund for Strategic Investments. 
08 Utver bidrag stder EU utvecklingen av vgntet genom finansieringsinstrument ssom ln och garantier fr att uppmuntra privata investeringar i transportinfrastruktur, till exempel FSE:s skuldinstrument och Europeiska fonden fr strategiska investeringar.
In addition, the European Investment Bank provides loans for road transport projects. 10 
Dessutom ger Europeiska investeringsbanken ln till vgtransportprojekt. 10
Audit scope and approach 09 In this audit we assessed progress towards achieving the EU objective of completing a fully functioning TEN-T core road network and the CommissionŐs role in this. 
Revisionens omfattning och inriktning samt revisionsmetod 09 Vid denna revision bedmde vi framstegen mot att uppn EU:s ml att slutfra ett fullt fungerande TEN-T-stomvgnt och kommissionens roll i detta.
10 We analysed the Commission's role and responsibilities in supporting the completion of the core road network by 2030. 
10 Vi analyserade kommissionens roll och ansvar nr det gller att stdja slutfrandet av stomvgntet senast 2030.
We assessed what the Commission has been doing at strategic level, how EU funding has been distributed and how the Commission has been monitoring implementation of the core network. 
Vi bedmde vad kommissionen har gjort p strategisk niv, hur EU-medel har frdelats och hur kommissionen har vervakat genomfrandet av stomntet.
We also held interviews with the European Commission: the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, INEA, European Coordinators and Eurostat. 
Vi gjorde ven intervjuer med kommissionen: generaldirektoratet fr transport och rrlighet, generaldirektoratet fr regional-och stadspolitik, Inea, europeiska samordnare och Eurostat.
We analysed the aggregated use of the ERDF and Cohesion Fund for the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 programming periods, as well as CEF allocations, i.e. we did not audit individual projects. 
Vi analyserade den samlade anvndningen av Eruf och Sammanhllningsfonden fr programperioderna 2007Đ2013 och 2014Đ2020 samt anslag frn FSE, vi granskade allts inte enskilda projekt.
11 To corroborate our findings at the Commission, we also visited four Member States: Bulgaria, The Czech Republic, Spain and Poland. 
11 Fr att bekrfta vra resultat hos kommissionen beskte vi ven fyra medlemsstater: Bulgarien, Tjeckien, Spanien och Polen.
Together, these Member States represent around 62 % of the total ERDF, Cohesion Fund and CEF funding allocated to road projects for the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 periods and are crossed by six of the nine core network corridors (Baltic-Adriatic, North Sea-Baltic, Mediterranean, Orient-East Mediterranean, Atlantic and Rhine-Danube) that are to be completed by 2030. 
Tillsammans str dessa medlemsstater fr omkring 62 % av de totala anslagen fr vgprojekt frn Eruf, Sammanhllningsfonden och FSE under 2007Đ2013 och 2014Đ2020, och de korsas av sex av de nio stomntskorridorerna ( stersjnĐAdriatiska havet, NordsjnĐ stersjn, Medelhavet, OrientenĐ stra Medelhavet, Atlanten och RhenĐDonau) som ska vara klara senast 2030.
We also held interviews with Member State authorities (ministries in charge of transport and infrastructure investments, managing authorities, road infrastructure managers) and other stakeholders (various national and European associations). 
Vi genomfrde ven intervjuer med medlemsstaternas myndigheter (ministerier med ansvar fr transport-och infrastrukturinvesteringar, frvaltande myndigheter, vginfrastrukturfrvaltare) och andra intressenter (olika nationella och europeiska sammanslutningar).
12 We decided to carry out this audit as it is relevant for a number of reasons. 
12 Vi beslutade att utfra denna revision eftersom den r relevant av flera skl.
The TEN-T core network should be completed by 2030 and the Commission has started the review of the TEN-T Regulation planned for 2021 at the latest. 
TEN-T-stomntet ska vara klart senast 2030 och kommissionen har inlett en versyn av TEN-T-frordningen som ska vara klar senast 2021.
Moreover, the EU has invested a lot of funding in roads: Ű78 billion since 2007 and negotiations concerning 2021-2027 11 
Dessutom har EU investerat stora belopp i vgar: 78 miljarder euro sedan 2007 och frhandlingar om programperioden 2021Đ2027 pgr.
In the recent years the ECA has examined numerous aspects of the TEN-T with particular focus on other modes of transport5. 
Under de senaste ren har revisionsrtten underskt ett flertal aspekter av TEN-T med srskild inriktning p andra transportstt5.
5 Special report 19/2018 ŇA European high-speed rail network: not a reality but an ineffective patchworkÓ; Special report 13/2017 ŇA single European rail traffic management system: will the political choice ever become reality?Ó; Special report 23/2016 ŇMaritime transport in the EU: in troubled waters Ńmuch ineffective and unsustainable investmentÓ; Special report 8/2016 ŇRail freight transport in the EU: still not on the right track. 
12 5 Srskild rapport 19/2018 Ett europeiskt jrnvgsnt fr hghastighetstrafik: nnu inte verklighet utan fortfarande ett ondamlsenligt lapptcke, srskild rapport 13/2017 Ett gemensamt europeiskt trafikstyrningssystem fr jrnvg: kommer det politiska beslutet ngonsin att bli verklighet?, srskild rapport 23/2016 Sjtransporten inom EU: p stormigt hav Đ till stora delar ondamlsenliga och ohllbara investeringar och srskild rapport 08/2016 Godstransporter p jrnvg i EU: nnu inte p rtt spr
Observations The development of the TEN-T core road network supported by EU funding and Commission action is making progress thereby achieving results for those traveling on the network 13 We reviewed progress in developing the TEN-T core network in the Member States. 
Iakttagelser Utvecklingen av TEN-T-stomvgntet med std av EU-finansiering och kommissionens tgrder gr framt och frbttrar drmed villkoren fr dem som anvnder ntet 13 Vi granskade framstegen med att utveckla TEN-T-stomntet i medlemsstaterna.
We examined whether EU funding and the Commission's involvement at strategy level contributed to this progress. 
Vi underskte om EU-finansiering och kommissionens deltagande p strategisk niv bidrog till dessa framsteg.
Finally, we collected information on the results achieved so far in terms of kilometres driven on a motorway and reduced travel times on different sections of the core network. 
Slutligen samlade vi in information om de resultat som hittills uppntts nr det gller krstrcka p motorvg och kortare restider p olika strckor i stomntet.
The TEN-T road network is progressing, with central and eastern European Member States still lagging behind 14 According to Eurostat, the overall number of kilometres of motorways (including TEN-T) in the EU between 2007 and 2017 increased by around 3 100 km. 
TEN-T-vgntet gr framsteg, men de central-och steuropeiska medlemsstaterna slpar fortfarande efter 14 Enligt Eurostat kade det totala antalet kilometer motorvg (inbegripet TEN-T) i EU mellan 2007 och 2017 med omkring 3 100 km.
The development of the road network is quite advanced in the nine core network corridors with the completion rate ranging from 70 % to almost 100 % (see Table 2). 
Utvecklingen av vgntet har kommit ganska lngt i de nio stomntskorridorerna med en slutfrandegrad p mellan 70 % och nstan 100 % (se tabell 2).
Table 2 Đ Status of completion of the nine core network corridors 13 Corridor Total length (in km) Completion status BalticĐAdriatic 3 600 84.0 % North SeaĐBaltic 4 092 70.0 % Mediterranean 5 500 98.0 % OrientĐEast Mediterranean 5 400 88.2 % Atlantic 4 535 99.8 % RhineĐDanube 4 488 78.0 % RhineĐAlpine 1 721 Largely fulfils standards ScandinavianĐ Mediterranean 6 300 99.0 % North SeaĐMediterranean 4 538 Compliant except for some last mile connections Source: ECA, based on latest corridor work plans. 
Tabell 2 Đ Status fr slutfrande av de nio stomntskorridorerna 13 Korridor Total lngd (i km) Slutfrandestatus stersjnĐAdriatiska havet 3 600 84,0 % NordsjnĐ stersjn 4 092 70,0 % Medelhavet 5 500 98,0 % OrientenĐ stra Medelhavet 5 400 88,2 % Atlanten 4 535 99,8 % RhenĐDonau 4 488 78,0 % RhenĐAlperna 1 721 Uppfyller standarderna i hg grad SkandinavienĐMedelhavet 6 300 99,0 % NordsjnĐMedelhavet 4 538 Uppfyller standarderna frutom nr det gller ngra anslutningslnkar Klla: Revisionsrtten, baserat p de senaste arbetsplanerna fr korridorerna.
15 The data aggregated by the Commission concerning the core network as a whole are subject to some limitations (see paragraph 48). 
15 De uppgifter som kommissionen sammanstller om stomntet som helhet har vissa begrnsningar (se punkt 48).
Notwithstanding, the data shows significant differences in the Member States, in particular between western and central/eastern European Member States. 
Trots detta pekar uppgifterna p betydande skillnader i medlemsstaterna, srskilt mellan vst-och central-/steuropeiska medlemsstater.
The completion rates for individual Member States as of 2016 (latest aggregated data), vary from 7 % (Lithuania) and 34 % (Estonia) to around 100 % (e.g. Spain, UK), whereas the completion rate of the core network at EU level is 77 % (see Picture 2). 
Slutfrandegraden fr enskilda medlemsstater r 2016 (senast sammanstllda uppgifter) varierar frn 7 % (Litauen) och 34 % (Estland) till omkring 100 % (t.ex. Spanien och Frenade kungariket), medan slutfrandegraden fr stomntet p EU-niv r 77 % (se bild 2).
We obtained more recent figures for the Member States visited: at the time of the audit the completion rate for Bulgaria it was 46 %, in The Czech Republic it was around 78 % and in Poland it was around 75 %. 
Vi erhll nyare siffror fr de beskta medlemsstaterna: nr revisionen gjordes var slutfrandegraden fr Bulgarien 46 %, i Tjeckien var den omkring 78 % och i Polen var den omkring 75 %.
Picture 2 Đ Completion of the TEN-T core road network by Member State as of 2016 14 Source: ECA, based on Commission data (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/849, OJ L 128I, 19.5.2017, p. 1). 16 This gap between the level of core network development in western and central/eastern Member States was confirmed in 2017 by the CommissionŐs seventh 
Bild 2 Đ Slutfrande av TEN-T-stomvgntet per medlemsstat r 2016 ES LV PT SI UK BE FR AT NL IE DK IT HU EU-genomsnitt SE EL CY FI PL HR DE CZ LU MT BG RO SK EE LT Klla: Revisionsrtten, p grundval av uppgifter frn kommissionen (kommissionens delegerade frordning (EU) 2017/849, EUT L 128/1, 19.5.2017, s. 1).
report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, which indicated that many regions in central and eastern European Member States are not yet connected by an efficient road network and will only have better access to markets after the completion of the TEN-T network6. 
16 Denna klyfta mellan stomntets utvecklingsniv i de vst-och central-/steuropeiska medlemsstaterna bekrftades 2017 i kommissionens sjunde rapport om ekonomisk, social och territoriell sammanhllning, som visade att mnga regioner i de central-och steuropeiska medlemsstaterna nnu inte r sammankopplade med ett effektivt vgnt och kommer att ha bttre tillgng till marknader frst efter att TEN-T-ntet har slutfrts6.
17 This difference was also highlighted in a 2016 study by the European Parliament7 comparing TEN-T roads connecting 13 pairs of cities in the EU-158 and central/eastern EU regions. 
17 Denna skillnad framhlls ocks i en studie frn 2016 gjord av Europaparlamentet7, dr man jmfrde TEN-T-vgar som frenar 13 par av stder i EU-158 och i centrala/stra EU-regioner.
The four pairs in the EU-15 were: Barcelona Đ Seville; Paris Đ Frankfurt; Cologne Đ Paris; and Munich Đ Verona, and the nine pairs in the central and eastern European Member States were: Zagreb Đ Bratislava; Warsaw Đ Prague; Zagreb Đ Lublin; Bratislava Đ Sofia; Budapest Đ Sofia; Budapest Đ Bucharest; Sofia Đ Constanta; Warsaw Đ Riga; and Vilnius Đ Lublin. 
De fyra paren i EU-15 var BarcelonaĐSevilla, ParisĐFrankfurt, KlnĐParis och MnchenĐVerona och de nio paren i de central-och steuropeiska medlemsstaterna var ZagrebĐBratislava, WarszawaĐPrag, ZagrebĐ Lublin, BratislavaĐSofia, BudapestĐSofia, BudapestĐBukarest, SofiaĐConstanta, WarszawaĐRiga och VilniusĐLublin.
The study concluded that there was a substantial difference in road speeds between them, with The Czech Republic, Slovakia and parts of Poland being far closer to the EU-15 averages than were the Baltic states, Romania and Bulgaria. 
I studien drogs slutsatsen att det fanns en avsevrd skillnad i vghastighet mellan dem: Tjeckien, Slovakien och delar av Polen lg lngt nrmare genomsnittet fr EU-15 n de baltiska staterna, Rumnien och Bulgarien.
The average speed for the four pairs in the EU-15 was 100 km/h, but for the nine pairs from the central/eastern EU it was 80 km/h. 
Medelhastigheten fr de fyra paren i EU-15 var 100 km/h, men fr de nio paren i centrala/stra EU var den 80 km/h.
This could be attributable to the fact that the roads connecting each city pair in the EU-15 were almost always (98 %) motorways, while in the newer Member States the percentage was significantly lower (53 %). 
Detta kan bero p att vgarna som sammanfr respektive stadspar i EU-15 nstan alltid var motorvgar (98 %), medan andelen motorvgar i de nyare medlemsstaterna var betydligt lgre (53 %).
18 Another factor came out of a 2018 survey by the World Economic Forum on the perceived quality of road infrastructure, using a scale from 1 (extremely poor) to 7 (extremely good). 
18 En annan faktor framgick av en underskning av den upplevda kvaliteten p vginfrastrukturen som Vrldsekonomiskt forum genomfrde 2018, dr en skala frn 1 (extremt dlig) till 7 (extremt bra) anvndes.
While the EU top ten included nine Member States from the EU-15, ranging from 5.34 in Luxembourg to 6.80 in the Netherlands, the eight lowest-ranking countries were in the central/eastern EU, ranging from 2.96 in Romania to 4.14 in Poland9. 
Bland de hgst rankade EU-lnderna fanns nio medlemsstater frn EU-15, dr pongen strckte sig frn 5,34 i Luxemburg till 6,80 i Nederlnderna, medan de tta lnder som var lgst rankade lg i centrala/stra EU, dr pongen varierade mellan 2,96 i Rumnien och 4,14 i Polen9.
European Commission, My region, My Europe, Our Future. Seventh report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, 2017, p. 
Europeiska kommissionen, Min region, mitt Europa, vr framtid: Sjunde rapporten om ekonomisk, social och territoriell sammanhllning, 2017, s.
European Parliament, Research for TRAN committee: Connectivity and Accessibility of Transport Infrastructure in Central and Eastern European EU Member States, In-depth Analysis, 2016. 
Europaparlamentet, Research for TRAN committee: Connectivity and Accessibility of Transport Infrastructure in Central and Eastern European EU Member States djupanalys, 2016.
EU Member States before the 2004 accession. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/scoreboard/compare/investments-infrastructure/quality-roads_en 15 6 7 8 9 
EU:s medlemsstater fre anslutningen 2004. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/scoreboard/compare/investments-infrastructure/quality-roads_en 15 6 7 8 9
EU funding has contributed large amounts to the development of the TEN-T since 2007 19 As stated in paragraph 14, the overall number of kilometres of motorways (including TEN-T) in the EU increased between 2007 and 2017 by around 3 100 km to which EU funding contributed with large amounts. 
EU-finansieringen har bidragit med stora belopp till utvecklingen av TEN-T sedan 2007 19 Ssom anges i punkt 14 kade motorvgarnas totala lngd (inbegripet TEN-T) i EU med omkring 3 100 km mellan 2007 och 2017, till vilket EU-finansieringen bidrog med stora belopp.
During the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 programming periods, the total value of EU grants for road projects, both within and outside the TEN-T, has been around Ű78 billion. 
Under programperioderna 2007Đ2013 och 2014Đ2020 har det totala vrdet p EU:s bidrag till vgprojekt, bde inom och utanfr TEN-T, uppgtt till omkring 78 miljarder euro.
The bulk of this support has come from the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund for projects concerning either newly built roads or reconstructed/upgraded roads (see Table 1). 
Merparten av detta std har kommit frn Eruf och Sammanhllningsfonden fr projekt som rr antingen nybyggda vgar eller ombyggda/uppgraderade vgar (se tabell 1).
Annexes I and II summarise the ESIF allocations for road investment by Member State and type of project for the 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 programming periods. 
I bilagorna I och II sammanfattas anslagen frn ESI-fonderna till vginvesteringar per medlemsstat och projekttyp fr programperioderna 2007Đ2013 och 2014Đ2020.
During the current period, 21 Member States have allocated ERDF and/or Cohesion Fund support to road projects. 
Under den innevarande perioden har 21 medlemsstater tilldelat std frn Eruf och/eller Sammanhllningsfonden till vgprojekt.
Poland alone accounts for almost 50 % of those allocations. 
Bara Polen str fr nstan 50 % av dessa anslag.
20 Out of the Ű78 billion dedicated to roads, Ű39.1 billion in ESIF support has been allocated specifically to TEN-T roads since 2007: (a) during the 2007-2013 period, Ű21.3 billion was used to support the construction of 2 400 km of new TEN-T roads, mostly motorways, mainly in EU-12, where over the period almost all the new motorways were built with EU support. 
20 Av de 78 miljarder euro som avsatts fr vgar har 39,1 miljarder euro i form av std frn ESI-fonderna anslagits specifikt till TEN-T-vgar sedan 2007: a) Under perioden 2007Đ2013 anvndes 21,3 miljarder euro fr att stdja byggandet av 2 400 km nya TEN-T-vgar, frmst motorvgar och huvudsakligen i EU-12, dr nstan alla nya motorvgar under perioden byggdes med EU-std.
It was particularly noted in Poland and Romania which built 1 056 km (124 % increase in the total length of motorways) and 314 km (129 % increase) respectively with 85 % EU co-financing10. 
Det var srskilt tydligt i Polen och Rumnien som byggde 1 056 km (kning av motorvgarnas totala lngd med 124 %) respektive 314 km (kning med 129 %) med EU-medfinansiering p 85 %10.
In addition to newly built TEN-T roads, the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund also supported the reconstruction of 28 600 km of roads, but no distinction was made at that time between the TEN-T and outside it; (b) during the 2014-2020 period, Ű17.8 billion have been allocated to around 2 000 km of newly built TEN-T roads and to 770 km of reconstructed TEN-T roads (including motorways). 
Utver nybyggda TEN-T-vgar stdde Eruf och Sammanhllningsfonden ven ombyggnad av 28 600 km vgar, men det gjordes ingen tskillnad mellan TEN-T-vgar och andra vgar. Under perioden 2014Đ2020 har 17,8 miljarder euro avsatts till omkring 2 000 km nybyggda TEN-T-vgar och till 770 km ombyggda TEN-T-vgar (inbegripet motorvgar).
16 Table 3 Đ New and reconstructed TEN-T roads to be supported by ESIF funding, 2014-2020 (in km) Source: ECA, based on CommissionŐs data11. 
Tabell 3 Đ Nya och ombyggda TEN-T-vgar som ska stdjas av finansiering frn ESI-fonderna, 2014Đ2020 (i km) Klla: Revisionsrtten, p grundval av uppgifter frn kommissionen11.
21 However, at the time of the audit the completion rate of TEN-T road projects co-financed with ESIF in 2014-2020 programming period was still low. 
21 Nr revisionen gjordes var dock slutfrandegraden fr TEN-T-vgprojekt som medfinansierades med ESI-fonderna under programperioden 2014Đ2020 fortfarande lg.
For newly built TEN-T roads, out of 2 007 km planned, 390 km have been completed so far. 
Fr nybyggda TEN-T-vgar har hittills 390 km slutfrts av de 2 007 km som planerats.
In case of reconstructed roads, it has been 387 km out of 770 km12. 
Nr det gller ombyggda vgar rr det sig om 387 km av 770 km12.
22 In the three Member States we visited in which the core network was not complete yet (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Poland), the ESIF funding has been contributing to progress in the 2014-2020 programming period (see Box 1). 
22 I de tre medlemsstater som vi beskte dr stomntet nnu inte var klart (Bulgarien, Tjeckien och Polen) har finansieringen frn ESI-fonderna bidragit till framstegen under programperioden 2014Đ2020 (se ruta 1).
17 ERDF Cohesion Fund Total Newly built 327 1 681 2 007 Reconstructed 127 643 770 Box 1 Contribution by ESIF funding to the development of the core road network in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Poland In Poland, 30 projects, each receiving the 85 % of EU co-financing, in the TEN-T core road network have been approved for ERDF or Cohesion Fund support. 
17 Eruf Sammanhllningsfonden Summa Nybyggda 327 1 681 2 007 Ombyggda 127 643 770 Ruta 1 Bidrag frn ESI-fonderna till utvecklingen av stomvgntet i Bulgarien, Tjeckien och Polen I Polen har 30 projekt i TEN-T-stomvgntet, som vart och ett medfinansieras av EU till 85 %, godknts fr std frn Eruf eller Sammanhllningsfonden.