natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission should therefore produce a new precise definition of Community requirements in this field and restructure the existing statistical instruments accordingly. 
Kommissionen br snarast faststlla en ny, exakt definition av gemenskapens behov p omrdet och omforma de befintliga statistiska verktygen i enlighet drmed.
C 45/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 INTRODUCTION 1. 
C 45/4 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 INLEDNING 1.
According to Article 33(1)(b) of the EC Treaty, one of the objectives of the common agricultural policy (CAP) is to guarantee Ôthe agricultural community a fair standard of living, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of people engaged in agricultureŐ (1). Although this is only one of the five objectives of agricultural policy expressly stated in the EC Treaty, the income of the agricultural community runs like a leitmotif through the CAP. 
Enligt artikel 33.1 b i EG-frdraget r ett av mlen fr den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken att Ótillfrskra jordbruksbefolkningen en sklig levnadsstandard, srskilt genom en hjning av den individuella inkomsten fr dem som arbetar i jordbruketÓ (1). ven om jordbruksbefolkningens inkomster bara r ett av de fem ml fr den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken som uttryckligen rknas upp i EG-frdraget, lper jordbruksbefolkningens inkomster som en rd trd genom hela den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
This stands out, in particular, in the preamble of the Mac Sharry reform, Agenda 2000 and the mid-term review (2). 2. 
Detta framgr bland annat av motiveringen till Mac Sharry-reformen, Agenda 2000 och halvtidsversynen (2). 2.
This is why the Court of Auditors devoted an audit to the methods used by the Member States for gathering data relating to agricultural incomes and the processing of these data by the Commission. The Court did not itself collect any data on incomes. 
Drfr har revisionsrtten granskat hur medlemsstaterna har samlat in uppgifter om jordbruksinkomster och hur kommissionen har behandlat uppgifterna. Revisionsrtten har sjlv inte samlat in uppgifter om inkomster, utan frmst granskat frfaringsstten och utvrderat de verktyg som kommissionen anvnder fr att mta eller uppskatta jordbruksbefolkningens inkomster.
THE COURTŐS AUDIT Audit approach 3. 
REVISIONSRTTENS GRANSKNING Granskningsmetod 3.
The standard of living of the agricultural community plays a major role in the discussions of the reform of the CAP. 
Jordbruksbefolkningens levnadsstandard spelar en viktig roll i diskussionerna om reformen av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
In order to be able to determine the consequences of a number of CAP reform measures on agricultural incomes, it is necessary to have reliable information on the composition of, and changes in, these incomes. 
Fr att kunna avgra vilka konsekvenser vissa tgrder i reformen av jordbrukspolitiken fr fr jordbruksinkomsterna r det ndvndigt att ha tillgng till tillfrlitliga uppgifter om inkomsternas sammansttning och utveckling ver tiden.
With regard to agricultural incomes, the Commission uses three statistical instruments: the Farming Accountancy Data Network (FADN), the Economic Accounts for Agriculture (EAA) and data from a special project devoted to the Incomes of the Agricultural Household Sector (IAHS). 
Vad gller jordbruksinkomster anvnder kommissionen tre statistiska verktyg: informationssystemet fr jordbruksfretagens redovisningsuppgifter (ISJR), rkenskaper fr jordbruket (Economic Accounts for agriculture, EAA) och uppgifter frn ett srskilt projekt om inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn.
As the Member States form the basis of the statistical system and the Commission has a conceptual, coordinating and supervisory role in this system, the audit concentrated on the following points: Ń the collection by the Member States of data for the three instruments mentioned above and, Ń the pertinence of these instruments, i.e. their appropriateness to the needs arising in the context of management and development by the Commission of the CAP. 
Eftersom grunden fr det statistiska systemet ligger hos medlemsstaterna och kommissionens roll r att utforma, samordna och vervaka systemet, har granskningen inriktats p fljande punkter: Ń Framtagandet av uppgifter i medlemsstaterna fr de ovan nmnda statistiska verktygen. Ń Relevansen hos dessa verktyg, det vill sga om de r vad kommissionen behver fr att kunna frvalta och utveckla den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
Implementation of the audit and audit criteria 5. 
Genomfrandet av granskningen och granskningskriterier 5.
The audit was carried out in six Member States (Germany, Greece, France, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden) and at the Commission; the most recent available data examined concerned the financial years 1999 and 2000. 
Granskningen genomfrdes i sex medlemsstater (Tyskland, Grekland, Frankrike, Nederlnderna, sterrike och Sverige) och vid kommissionen. De senaste uppgifterna som fanns tillgngliga och som granskades gllde budgetren 1999 och 2000.
As the information concerning incomes constitutes statistical data, the quality requirements for statistical data developed by the European statistical system (Eurostat and the statistical offices of the community Member States) were used as audit criteria. 
Eftersom uppgifterna om inkomster r av statistiskt slag, har man valt att som granskningskriterier ta fasta p de kvalitetskrav p statistiska uppgifter som faststllts i det europeiska statistiska systemet, det vill sga av Eurostat och av statistikkontoren i Europeiska gemenskapens medlemsstater.
ISO standard 8402 Ń 1986 defines quality as Ôthe totality of characteristics of an entity that bear on its ability to satisfy stated and implied needsŐ (3). 
Kvalitet definieras i ISO 8402Đ1986 som summan av en produkts eller tjnsts egenskaper och knnetecken vilka har betydelse fr dess frmga att tillfredsstlla uttalade eller underfrstdda behov (3).
On this basis, the European statistical system has worked out a concept of quality applicable to statistics which takes the following aspects into account (4): (a) completeness (complete coverage of the field); (b) exactness (close estimate to the real (but unknown) value); (3) Eurostat, Assessment of the Quality in Statistics, Luxembourg, 4 to 5 April 2000, p. 2. 
P basis av detta har man inom det europeiska statistiska systemet utarbetat ett begrepp fr statistikkvalitet som tar hnsyn till fljande kriterier (4): a) Fullstndighet (en fullstndig tckning av hela omrdet). b) Exakthet (det uppskattade vrdet ligger nra det oknda verkliga vrdet). (3) Eurostat, Assessment of the Quality in Statistics, Luxemburg, 4Đ5 april 2000, s. 2.
(4) Eurostat, Assessment of the Quality in Statistics, Luxembourg, 4 to 5 April 2000, p. 
(4) Eurostat, Assessment of the Quality in Statistics, Luxemburg, 4Đ5 april 2000, s.
(1) The wording of Article 33 of the EC Treaty is as follows: Ô1. 
(1) Artikel 33 i EG-frdraget lyder: Ó1.
The objectives of the common agricultural policy shall be: (a) to increase agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour; (b) thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture; (c) to stabilise markets; (d) to assure the availability of supplies; (e) to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices. 
Den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken skall ha som ml att a) hja produktiviteten inom jordbruket genom att frmja tekniska framsteg och genom att trygga en rationell utveckling av jordbruksproduktionen och ett optimalt utnyttjande av produktionsfaktorerna, srskilt arbetskraften, b) p s stt tillfrskra jordbruksbefolkningen en sklig levnadsstandard, srskilt genom en hjning av den individuella inkomsten fr dem som arbetar i jordbruket, c) stabilisera marknaderna, d) trygga frsrjningen, e) tillfrskra konsumenterna tillgng till varor till skliga priser.
In working out the common agricultural policy and the special methods for its application, account shall be taken of: (a) the particular nature of agricultural activity, which results from the social structure of agriculture and from structural and natural disparities between the various agricultural regions; (b) the need to effect the appropriate adjustments by degrees; (c) the fact that in the Member States agriculture constitutes a sector closely linked with the economy as a whole.Ő Communication from the Commission to the Council and Parliament, Perspectives for the common agricultural policy, Luxembourg, 15 July 1985, COM(85) 333 final, p. 
Vid utformningen av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken och de srskilda tgrder som krvs fr att tillmpa den skall hnsyn tas till a) jordbruksnringens srskilda karaktr som r en fljd av jordbrukets sociala struktur och av strukturella och naturbetingade olikheter mellan olika jordbruksregioner, b) ndvndigheten av att gradvis genomfra lmpliga anpass-ningstgrder, c) det faktum att jordbruket i medlemsstaterna utgr en sektor som r nra frbunden med ekonomin i dess helhet.Ó Meddelande frn kommissionen till rdet och Europaparlamentet, Perspektiv fr den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, Luxemburg, 15 juli 1985, KOM(85) 333 slutlig, s.
20 f; Commission of the European Communities, Proposals for Council Regulations (EC) concerning the reform of the common agricultural policy, Brussels, 18 March 1998, COM(1998) 158 final, p. 
20 f.; Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, frslag till rdets frordningar (EG) om reformen av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, Bryssel, 18 mars 1998, KOM(1998) 158 slutlig, s.
5 (paragraph 2.1); Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, mid-term review of the common agricultural policy, Brussels, 10 July 2002, COM(2002) 394, pp.1, 7 ff. (explanatory memorandum). 
5 (punkt 2.1); Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, meddelande frn kommissionen till rdet och Europaparlamentet, halvtidsversyn av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, Bryssel, 10 juli 2002, KOM(2002) 394, s. 1 och 7 f (motivering).
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/5 (c) consistency (use of uniform definitions, classifications and methods); (d) comparability over time among the Member States and the various years; (e) accessibility and clarity of information (for example user-friendly presentation, help for users); (f) production in good time and punctuality (publication of the results at the appropriate time and within predetermined deadlines); (g) relevance (usefulness of information for users); (h) economy (relationship between costs and benefits of producing data). 
20.2.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 45/5 c) Enhetlighet (anvndning av enhetliga definitioner, klassificeringar och metoder). d) Jmfrbarhet i tid och mellan medlemsstater. e) Tillgnglighet och klarhet vad gller informationen (till exempel lttillgnglighet och hjlp till anvndarna). f) Aktualitet och punktlighet (resultat som offentliggrs ofta och i tid p i frvg faststllda datum). g) Relevans (informationen skall motsvara anvndarnas krav). h) Ekonomi (verensstmmelse mellan kostnader och nytta med framtagandet av uppgifter).
This criterion was added by the Court because it must always be asked whether the usefulness of a particular set of statistics justifies their actual cost. 
Detta kriterium har revisionsrtten lagt till eftersom det alltid br ifrgasttas om kostnaden fr en statistikuppgift berttigas av dess reella anvndbarhet.
STATISTICAL TOOLS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF INCOMES 7. 
STATISTISKA VERKTYG F R BERKNING AV INKOMSTER 7.
This chapter gives the main characteristics of the statistical instruments used by the Commission and the findings of the audits carried out in the six Member States visited. 
I detta kapitel beskrivs huvuddragen hos de statistiska verktyg som kommissionen anvnder och de resultat som framkom efter granskningar i de sex medlemsstater som besktes.
The Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) Legal basis and concept 8. 
Informationssystemet fr jordbruksfretagens redovisningsuppgifter (ISJR) Rttslig grund och begrepp 8.
Council Regulation No 79/65/EEC of 15 June 1965 (1) constitutes the legal basis of the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN). The purpose of the FADN is to collect accounting data to permit Ôan annual determination of incomes on agricultural holdingsŐ and Ôa business analysis of agricultural holdingsŐ (2). This information comes from a sample of approximately 60 000 farms, representing more than 90 % of agricultural production in the European Community. 
Rdets frordning (EEG) nr 79/65 av den 15 juni 1965 (1) r den rttsliga grunden fr informationssystemet fr jordbruksfretagens redovisningsuppgifter (ISJR). ndamlet med ISJR r att samla in de redovisningsuppgifter som behvs fr Óett rligt faststllande av inkomster (...) i jordbruksfretagÓ och Óen analys av vriga ekonomiska frhllandenÓ i dem (2). Dessa uppgifter kommer frn ett stickprov av omkring 60 000 jordbruksfretag som r representativa fr ver 90 % av Europeiska gemenskapens jordbruksproduktion.
The FADN is managed by the Commission. 
ISJR frvaltas av kommissionen.
However, it does not collect the data directly, but relies on the Member States, which are represented within the Community FADN Committee by their liaison agencies. 
Kommissionen samlar dock inte sjlv in uppgifter utan frlitar sig p medlemsstaterna som representeras i ISJR:s gemenskapskommitt av sina samordningsorgan.
These liaison agencies are essentially responsible for the selection of the farms, the accuracy of the recorded data and the transmission of these data to the (1) OJ 109, 23.6.1965, pp. 1859-1865. 
Samordningsorganen r huvudsakligen ansvariga fr att vlja ut jordbruksfretag, se till att registrerade uppgifter r exakta och verlmna uppgifterna inom faststlld tid till (1) EGT P 109, 23.6.1965 s.1859Đ1865.
(2) Article 1(2) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC. Commission within the established time (3). 
(2) Artikel 1.2 i frordning (EEG) nr 79/65. kommissionen (3).
The indicators calculated in the context of the FADN, based on the financial statements of the farms, concern gross and net value added and family farm income. 
De indikatorer som har berknats inom ramen fr ISJR med utgngspunkt i jordbruksfretagens rsredovisningar avser brutto-och nettomervrde, samt familjejordbruksfretagens inkomster.
Figure 1 explains how these three indicators are calculated. 
I figur 1 frklaras berkningsmodellen fr dessa tre indikatorer.
Figure 1 Calculation of income indicators in the framework of the FADN Final stock agricultural products + Sales + Correction livestock inventory values + Farmhouse consumption + Farm use Đ Starter stock agricultural products Đ Purchases of livestock = Output (crop output plus livestock output) + Farm subsidies Đ Intermediate consumption (5) Đ Balance of VAT and farm taxes = Farm gross value added (Gross farm income) Đ Depreciation = Farm net value added + Subsidies on investments Đ Wages (6), rents and interest paid = Family farm income Source: Farm Incomes, Wealth and Agricultural Policy, Berkeley Hill, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Hants 2000, third edition, p. 
Figur 1 Berkning av inkomstindikatorer inom ramen fr ISJR Slutligt lager jordbruksprodukter + Frsljning + Justering av vrdena i inventariefrteckningen ver boskap + Egen konsumtion + Egen anvndning Đ Ursprungligt lager jordbruksprodukter Đ Inkp av djur = Produktion (djur och grdor) + Fretagsstd Đ Ingende delar i insatsfrbrukningen (5) Đ Saldo moms och fretagsskatter = Fretagets bruttomervrde (fretagets bruttoinkomst) Đ Avskrivningar = Fretagets nettomervrde + Investeringsstd Đ Lner (6), arrendeavgifter och betalda rntor = Familjejordbruksfretagets inkomst Klla: Farm Incomes, Wealth and Agricultural Policy, Berkeley Hill, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Hants 2000, tredje upplagan, s.
Observations Population coverage 11. 
Iakttagelser Andel av befolkningen som omfattas 11.
Pursuant to Article 4(1) and (2) of Regulation No 79/65/ EEC, the FADN field of survey covers agricultural holdings in excess of a given minimum size. 
I enlighet med artikel 4.1Đ4.2 i frordning (EEG) nr79/65 omfattar ISJR:s underskningsomrde de jordbruksfretag som uppfyller vissa bestmda minimikrav.
A different minimum size is defined for each Member State in such a way that each field of (3) Article 6(1) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC. 
Tydliga minimikrav har faststllts fr varje medlemsstat s att varje (3) Artikel 6.1 i frordning (EEG) nr 79/65.
(4) Article 20 of Regulation No 79/65/EEC. 
(4) Artikel 20 i frordning (EEG) nr 79/65.
(5) Intermediate consumption consists of the costs of certain supplies (including inputs produced on the holding) and miscellaneous costs associated with production during the accounting year. Examples: seed, manure, cattle feed, etc. 
(5) Insatsfrbrukningen utgrs av srskilda lagerkostnader (inklusive insatsvaror producerade inom fretaget) och allmnna produktionskostnader under budgetret, till exempel utsde, gdningsmedel, foder, etc.
(6) Including wages paid to members of the family under a contract of employment. 
(6) Inklusive lner som betalats ut till familjemedlemmar inom ramen fr ett anstllningskontrakt.
C 45/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 survey covers at least 90 % of the standard gross margin (SGM) (1) of the farms of the Member State (2). 
C 45/6 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 underskningsomrde tcker minst 90 % av standardtckningsbidraget (1) till medlemsstatens jordbruksfretag (2).
The audit nevertheless showed that the FADN field of survey is not defined in a uniform manner in all Member States; the following features, which are liable to affect the comparability of the results, were found: (a) the economic size threshold of the holdings was set so high in one Member State, that, for 1995 and 1997, the field of survey covered less than 90 % of the SGM (Austria); (b) farms in the form of corporations are proportionally under-represented (Netherlands); (c) the overseas regions of one Member State are excluded (France) (3). 
Granskningen visade dock att ISJR:s underskningsomrde inte har avgrnsats p samma stt i alla medlemsstater. Man fann fljande srdrag som kan pverka resultatens jmfrbarhet: a) Den ekonomiska trskeln fr fretagen r s hg i en medlemsstat att underskningsomrdet fr ren 1995 och 1997 tckte mindre n 90 % av standardtckningsbidraget ( sterrike). b) Jordbruksfretag som r rttsenligt bildade bolag r proportionellt sett underrepresenterade (Nederlnderna). c) En medlemsstats utomeuropeiska departement r inte med-rknade (Frankrike) (3).
Selection of the holdings to be included in the sample 13. 
Urval av jordbruksfretag som skall ing i stickprovet 13.
In order to optimise the quality of the results obtained, the individual components of the sample must be selected at random (4). 
Fr att f en s bra kvalitet som mjligt p resultaten som framkommit genom stickprovet, br de enskilda fretagen i stickprovet vljas ut slumpmssigt(4).
Nevertheless, in practice, two conditions stand in the way of genuine random sampling, the availability of suitable accounts documents and the fact that farmer participation in the FADN is voluntary (they cannot be forced to provide data). 
I praktiken finns dock tv omstndigheter som frhindrar ett helt slumpmssigt urval, nmligen tillgngen p relevanta rkenskapsdokument, samt att jordbrukarnas deltagande i ISJR bygger p frivillighet (ingen kan tvingas att lmna uppgifter).
Disregarding these two factors, selection must be carried out as rigorously as possible in accordance with the principle of random sampling Ń the sample must be drawn at random from the subset of farms within the field of survey which fulfil the two conditions mentioned (5). 
Bortsett frn dessa tv faktorer br urvalet gras med strsta respekt fr principen om det slumpmssiga urvalet: stickprovet skall gras slumpmssigt i den delmngd av underskningsomrdet som utgrs av jordbrukare som uppfyller de bda ovan nmnda villkoren (5).
As far as methodology is concerned, this is an essential condition for a valid extrapolation of the results of the sample. 
Nr det gller metod r detta ett vsentligt villkor fr en giltig extrapolering av resultaten av stickprovet.
The checks carried out in the Member States showed that the principle of the random selection of the holdings was not always complied with. 
Vid granskningarna i medlemsstaterna visade det sig att principen om det slumpmssiga urvalet inte alltid hade respekterats.
In one of the Member States, the population of the holdings is divided up among several subsets, whose components do not all have the same probability of being taken up in the sample (France). 
I en medlemsstat r populationen av jordbruksfretag uppdelad p flera delmngder, vars bestndsdelar inte var och en lika sjlvklart ingick i stickprovet (Frankrike).
In a third Member State, an official selects the holdings to be included in the sample at his own discretion (Greece). 
I en tredje medlemsstat vljer en tjnsteman efter eget tycke ut vilka jordbruk som skall ing i stickprovet (Grekland).
Moreover, the period that the holdings remain in the sample varies significantly considerably from one Member State to another. 
Dessutom varierar den tid som jordbruken ingr i stickprovet kraftigt mellan de olika medlemsstaterna.
An analysis of the CommissionŐs data showed that the proportion of holdings that were selected in 1995 and still included in the 1999 sample ranged between 28 % and 88 %. 
Vid en analys av kommissionens uppgifter visade det sig att andelen jordbruk som valts ut under 1995 och ter tagits med i stickprovet 1999 varierar frn 28 % till 88 %.
This means that, in one case, only about 4 % of the holdings were replaced each year, while in the other, almost 24 % of the sample was renewed. 
Detta innebr att i ett fall erstts endast cirka 4 % av jordbruken varje r, medan nstan 24 % av stickprovet frnyades i ett annat fall.
These figures reflect two different concerns: whereas the ÔconservativeŐ approach to the sample stresses the long-term development of the holdings contained in the sample, its rapid renewal aims at preserving its representativeness by monitoring the development of agricultural structures as closely as possible. 
Dessa siffror speglar tv olika synstt: dels ett ÓkonservativtÓ synstt som betonar den lngsiktiga utvecklingen av fretagen i stickprovet, dels ett synstt dr man ofta byter ut stickprovet med syfte att bevara dess representativitet genom att nra flja utvecklingen i jordbruksstrukturen.
Representativeness of the sample 16. 
Stickprovets representativitet 16.
Pursuant to Article 4(2)(c) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC, the selected agricultural holdings must be representative of the FADN field of survey. 
Enligt artikel 4.2 c i frordning (EEG) nr 79/65 mste de utvalda jordbruksfretagen vara representativa fr ISJR:s under-skningsomrde.
The holdings are therefore divided up into cells, by type of farming, size and region in accordance with the Community typology. A sample is taken from these cells. 
Jordbruksfretagen r allts i enlighet med gemenskapstypologin uppdelade p flera grupper, dr varje grupp motsvarar en srskild teknisk-ekonomisk inriktning, en srskild ekonomisk storlek och ett srskilt geografiskt omrde. Ett stickprov grs i dessa grupper.
From a technical point of view, the selection plan and the implementation report are the tools used for controlling the representativeness of the sample (6). 
Tekniskt sett anvnds planer fr urval av rapporterande fretag (urvalsplaner) och rapporter om genomfrande fr att kontrollera stickprovets representativitet (6).