natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To encourage recovery by Member States of irregular payments under the CAP, the Commission should consider: Ń charging to Member States irregular CAP payments which have been outstanding for longer than a specific period and in respect of which no proposal for writing off has been received, Ń ensuring that irregular payments are offset against other EU payments due to the recipient, Ń asking Member States to give at least the same priority to the recovery of CAP debts as to the recovery of national subsidies. 
Fr att uppmuntra medlemsstaterna att tervinna felaktigt utbetalda medel inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, br kommissionen vervga att Ń pfra medlemsstaterna kostnaden fr felaktiga utbetalningar inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken som har varit utestende lngre tid n en specifik period och fr vilka inga frslag om avskrivning har mottagits, Ń se till att felaktiga utbetalningar kvittas mot andra kommande utbetalningar av EU-medel till mottagaren, Ń begra att medlemsstaterna ger tervinningen av fordringar inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken tminstone lika hg prioritet som tervinningen av nationella bidrag.
The Commission should establish clear criteria for deciding whether irregular payments written off should be charged to Member States or borne by the Community. 
Kommissionen br faststlla tydliga kriterier fr hur man skall besluta om huruvida felaktigt utbetalda medel som skrivits av skall pfras medlemsstaterna eller bras av gemenskapen.
The Commission should take action against Member States which have offset amounts to be recovered against flat-rate corrections. 
Kommissionen br vidta tgrder mot medlemsstater som har kvittat belopp som skall tervinnas mot schablonrttelser.
The Commission should consider whether the present sharing of responsibilities for CAP irregularities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture is appropriate. 
Kommissionen br vervga om den nuvarande uppdelningen av ansvaret fr oriktigheter inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken mellan OLAF och generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk r lmplig.
The Commission should report each year on lessons learned from data on irregularites and the conclusions drawn for the management of the CAP. 
Kommissionen br rligen rapportera vad man har lrt av uppgifterna om oriktigheter och vilka slutsatser man har dragit drav nr det gller frvaltningen av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
Such a report might be included in the annual report on the fight against fraud or in the Annual Report on the CAP. 
En sdan rapport skulle kunna ing i rsrapporten om bedrgeribekmpning eller i rsrapporten om den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
In addition, the Commission should consult with Member States on the future of the ÔblacklistŐ. 
Dessutom br kommissionen verlgga med medlemsstaterna om Ósvarta listansÓ framtid.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 10 June 2004. 
Denna rapport har antagits av revisionsrtten vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 10 juni 2004.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union ANNEX B WEAKNESSES IN PROCEDURES FOR RECORDING AND RECOVERING DEBTS C 269/17 Qualification raised by Certifying Bodies OPEKEPE (EL) Vlaamse Gemeenschap (BE) IFADAP (PT) Significant weaknesses noted by Certifying Bodies Bayern StMLU (DE) Brandenburg (DE) DFFE (DK) CATALUA (ES) AGEA (IT) SEERAD (UK) SDE (FR) DAF (ES) INGA (PT) Lack of satisfactory work carried out by Certifying Bodies on debtorsŐ section (1) FAGA (ES) Castilla la Mancha (ES) OFIMER (FR) OFIVAL (FR) BLE (DE) Baden-Wrttemberg (DE) DLG (NL) HPA (NL) PZ (NL) PVVE (NL) Grounds for qualification Accuracy/completeness/provision of doubtful debtsŐ problems. 
4.11.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning BILAGA B BRISTER I F RFARANDENA F R REGISTRERING OCH TERVINNING AV FORDRINGAR C 269/17 De attesterande organens reservationer OPEKEPE (EL) Vlaamse Gemeenschap (BE) IFADAP (PT) Vsentliga brister noterade av attesterande organ Bayern StMLU (DE) Brandenburg (DE) DFFE (DK) CATALUA (ES) AGEA (IT) SEERAD (UK) SDE (FR) DAF (IE) INGA (PT) Brist p tillfredsstllande arbete utfrt av attesterande organ med avseende p fordringar (1) FAGA (ES) Castilla la Mancha (ES) OFIMER (FR) OFIVAL (FR) BLE (DE) Baden-Wurttemberg (DE) DLG (NL) HPA (NL) PZ (NL) PVVE (NL) Grunderna till reservationerna Problem med korrektheten/fullstndigheten/redovisningen av oskra fordringar.
Unable to certify completeness of Table 105. 
Kan inte intyga att tabell 105 r fullstndig.
Problems concerning completeness and accuracy aspects of Table 105. 
Problem med fullstndigheten och korrektheten i tabell 105.
Long delays in the recording and recovery of debts, there was no consistent policy on charging interest. Problems noted in the recovery of debts. 
Stora frseningar i registreringen och tervinningen av skulder, det fanns ingen konsekvent policy fr att pfra rnta. Problem med tervinning av fordringar.
Long delays in the recording and recovery of debts, no reconciliation between the accounting records and debtorsŐ ledger. 
Kraftiga frseningar i registreringen och tervinningen av fordringar, ingen avstmning mellan bokfringsmaterial och fordringsliggare.
Qualification was raised last year, recovery problems continued to be noted this year. 
Reservationer gjordes fregende r, problem med tervinningen iakttogs ven i r.
Lengthy intervals between the notification of irregularities and their recording in the debtorsŐ ledger. 
Lnga intervaller mellan det att oriktigheterna meddelades och att de frdes in i fordringsliggaren.
Debts understated by 3 %. 
Fordringarna underskattade med 3 %.
Reasons for unsatisfactory work Scope of CBs debtorsŐ audit did not meet the requirements mentioned in the Commission guidelines. 
Anledningar till otillfredsstllande arbete Omfattningen av de attesterande organens granskning av fordringar levde inte upp till kraven i kommissionens riktlinjer.
(1) Conclusions are based upon the CourtŐs evaluation of the CB reports. 
(1) Slutsatsen baseras p revisionsrttens utvrdering av de attesterande organens rapporter.
Source: DebtorsŐ section in Certifying Body reports for EAGGF year 2002. 
Klla: Avsnittet om fordringar i de attesterande organens rapporter fr EUGFJ r 2002.
C 269/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 SUMMARY I. For the protection of its financial interests, Community legislation lays down reporting requirements as regards Community fields of activity (1). 
C 269/18 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 4.11.2004 SAMMANFATTNING I. Fr att skydda gemenskapens ekonomiska intressen stadgar EG-lagstiftningen om rapporteringsskyldigheter om sdant som rr gemenskapens verksamhetsomrden.
The Member States must send regular reports of irregularities which have been the subject of primary administrative or judicial findings of fact. 
(1) Medlemsstaterna mste snda regelbundna rapporter om sdana oegentligheter som varit freml fr inledande administrativa eller rttsliga underskningar.
Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 organises the system of communications of irregularities in the field of the expenditure by the EAGGF Ń Guarantee Section (European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund). In order to facilitate exploitation of the information notified to the Commission, Community legislation contains a detailed list of the information to be provided, in particular the provision which has been infringed, the amounts in question, the practices used to commit the irregularity, and the natural or legal persons involved (2). 
Frordning (EEG) nr 595/91 innehller bestmmelser fr hur oegentligheterna skall meddelas nr de berr utgifter inom garantisektionen vid EUGFJ (Europeiska utvecklings-och garantifonden fr jordbruket). Fr att gra det lttare att utnyttja den information som anmlts till kommissionen innehller EG:s lagstiftning en detaljerad frteckning ver vilka uppgifter som skall lmnas, bl.a. vilken bestmmelse som vertrtts, de aktuella beloppen, metoder som anvnts nr oegentligheten begicks samt inblandade fysiska eller juridiska personer.
Member States have the obligation to prevent and deal with irregularities and to recover amounts lost as a result of irregularities or negligence (3). 
(2) Medlemsstaterna r skyldiga att frhindra och ta itu med oegentligheter och att tervinna belopp som frlorats till fljd av oegentligheter eller oaktsamhet (3).
Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 provides for the communication of all irregularities above EUR 4 000 to the Commission, meaning that all behaviour, intentional or not, that results in the infringement of a provision of Community law has to be communicated. 
I frordning (EEG) nr 595/91 finns freskrifter om att alla oegentligheter ver 4 000 euro skall meddelas till kommissionen, vilket innebr att allt agerande, avsiktligt eller ej, som medfr vertrdelse av en bestmmelse i EG:s lagstiftning mste meddelas.
The Commission has taken different initiatives in order to ensure that cases should be identified as a fraud or an irregularity. 
Kommissionen har tagit olika initiativ fr att skerstlla att fall kan identifieras antingen som bedrgeri eller oegentlighet.
The mutual notification and information system thus established is the concrete expression of the mutual duties of sincere cooperation arising from Article 10 of the EC Treaty (4), on which the CommissionŐs antifraud strategy, defined in July 2000 (5), rests. 
Det msesidiga anmlnings-och informationssystem som slunda etablerats r ett konkret uttryck fr de msesidiga frpliktelserna om serist samarbete som anges i artikel 10 i EG-frdraget (4). P denna artikel vilar kommissionens bedrge-ribekmpningsstrategi, som definierades i juli 2000 (5).
This partnership between the Commission and the Member States is also the guiding principle behind the provisions of secondary legislation. 
Partnerskapet mellan kommissionen och medlemsstaterna r ocks den vgledande principen bakom bestmmelserna i sekundrlagstiftningen.
(1) See in particular Article 3(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 (OJ L 67, 7.3.1997), Commission Regulation (EC) No 1681/94 and (EC) No 1831/94 of 26 July 1994 (OJ L 191, 27.7.1994) for expenditure, and Article 6(5) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 for traditional own resources. 
(1) Se srskilt artikel 3.1 i rdets frordning (EEG) nr 595/91 (EGT L 67, 7.3.1997), kommissionens frordningar (EG) nr 1681/94 och (EG) nr 1831/94 (EGT L 191, 27.7.1994) fr utgifter, och artikel 6.5 i rdets frordning (EG, Euratom) nr 1150/2000 fr traditionella egna medel.
(2) Except for Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 implementing Decision 94/728/EC, Euratom on the system of the CommunitiesŐ own resources (OJ L 130, 31.5.2000), where this information is optional only. 
(2) Med undantag fr rdets frordning (EG, Euratom) nr 1150/2000 om genomfrande av beslut 94/728/EG, Euratom om systemet fr gemenskapernas egna medel (EGT L 130, 31.5.2000), dr denna information r frivillig.
(3) See Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 2988/95 (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995) and Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999). 
(3) Se artikel 8 i frordning (EEG) nr 2988/95 (EGT L 312, 23.12.1995) och artikel 8 i frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 (EGT L 160, 26.6.1999).
(4) As confirmed by the Court in the Zwartfeld and Yugoslav maize cases. 
(4) Som bekrftats av EG-domstolen (mlen Zwartfeld och jugoslavisk majs).
Case C-2/88 [1990] ECR I-3365, 13.7.1990; Case C-68/88 Commission v Greece [1989] ECR 2965. 
1990, s. IĐ3365. Ml CĐ68/88 kommissionen mot Grekland, Rec.
(5) COM(2000) 358 final of 28 June 2000 and Action Plan 2001-2003 (COM(2001) 254 final of 15 May 2001). 
(5) KOM(2000) 358 slutlig, av den 28 juni 2000 och handlingsplan 2001Đ2003 (KOM(2001) 254 slutlig, av den 15 maj 2001).
As the Council has stressed on a number of occasions, it is essential that the information supplied be consistent and of high quality if the Commission is to make the best use of it in stepping up the fight against fraud and ensuring that cases are properly followed up (6), at both national and Community level. 
Som rdet betonat vid ett antal tillfllen r det vsentligt att den information som lmnas r konsekvent och av hg kvalitet om kommissionen skall kunna anvnda den p bsta stt nr den intensifierar bedrgeribekmpningen och ser till att rendena fr en ordentlig uppfljning(6) bde p medlemsstats-och gemenskapsniv.
The experience gained and the improvements realised will contribute to increasing the efficiency of the notification system and the reliability of the data. 
Den erfarenhet som vunnits och de frbttringar som gjorts kommer att bidra till att ka anmlningssystemets effektivitet och uppgifternas tillfrlitlighet.
According to the Commission Report on the Protection of the Financial Interests of the Community and Fight Against Fraud Ń Annual Report 2002 hereafter referred to as ÔCommission Report 2002 on the fight against fraudŐ, the highest amounts affected by the irregularities were reported in the fruit and vegetable sector. 
Enligt kommissionsrapporten ÓSkydd av gemenskapernas ekonomiska intressen och bedrgeribekmpning Đ rsrapport 2002Ó (nedan kallad Ókommissionens bedrgeribekmpningsrapport fr 2002Ó) inrapporterades de hgsta beloppen som pverkats av oegentligheter inom frukt-och grnsakssektorn.
Member States were also informed of this trend in several meetings as Article 280 Working Group, Cocolaf and the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ. 
Medlemsstaterna informerades ocks om denna trend vid flera mten i artikel 280-arbetsgruppen, Rdgivande kommittn fr samordning av bedrgeribekmpningen (COCOLAF) samt arbetsgruppen ÓOegentligheter och msesidigt bistnd Đ JordbruksprodukterÓ.
The electronic data base storing the bulk of communications of irregularities transmitted by Member States has been subjected to a thorough quality check in 2003 by the Commission with the participation of Member States, which resulted in an improved internal consistency of the data while at the same time the figures were updated. 
Kommissionen utfrde 2003 med deltagande av medlemsstaterna en noggrann kvalitetskontroll av den elektroniska databas dr strre delen av medlemsstaternas meddelanden om oegentligheter lagras, vilket resulterade i en frbttrad intern verensstmmelse mellan uppgifterna samtidigt som siffrorna aktualiserades.
The updated figures (see paragraph 30) outstanding at 31 December 2002 should read as follows: the total irregular payments reported since 1971 represent EUR 2 983 million. 
De aktualiserade siffrorna (se punkt 30) fr utestende belopp per den 31 december 2002 br lsas p fljande stt: de sammanlagda felaktiga utbetalningar som rapporterats sedan 1971 uppgr till 2 983 miljoner euro.
Of this sum, EUR 603 million (20 %) have been recovered and EUR 297 million have been written off (10 %). 
Av detta belopp har 603 miljoner euro (20 %) tervunnits och 297 miljoner euro har avskrivits (10 %).
The amount still pending represents EUR 2 083 million (70 %). 
Beloppet fr oavslutade renden uppgr till 2 083miljo-ner euro (70 %).
These figures include also the updates which the Commission received in the year 2003 and the financial impact of Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million). 
Dessa siffror inkluderar ven de aktualiseringar som kommissionen mottagit under r 2003 och de ekonomiska effekterna av kommissionens beslut 2003/481/EG (75 miljoner euro).
Some Member States do not fulfil their obligation to report within two months of the end of the quarter in which an irregularity was detected and/or new information concerning an irregularity has become known (Regulation (EEC) No 595/91, Articles 3(1) and 5(1)). 
Vissa medlemsstater uppfyller inte sin skyldighet att lmna rapport inom tv mnader efter utgngen av det kvartal d oegentligheten upptcktes och/eller ny information om en oegentlighet blev knd (frordning (EEG) nr 595/91, artiklarna 3.1 och 5.1).
Among these Member States, Germany and Spain account for more than 50 % of the reported irregularities. 
Bland dessa medlemsstater str Tyskland och Spanien fr mer n 50 % av de rapporterade oegentligheterna.
The Commission has made Member States aware of this problem by reporting this in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2) and discussing the problem in several meetings as Article 280 Working Group, Cocolaf and the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ. 
Kommissionen har ppekat detta problem fr medlemsstaterna i bedrgeribekmpningsrapporten fr 2002 (punkt 10.2.2) och diskuterat det vid flera mten, t.ex. i artikel 280-arbetsgruppen, Rdgivande kommittn fr samordning av bedrgeribekmpningen samt arbetsgruppen ÓOegentligheter och msesidigt bistnd Đ JordbruksprodukterÓ.
(6) Including the accounting and recovery aspects. THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES 
(6) Inklusive redovisnings-och tervinningsaspekterna. KOMMISSIONENS SVAR
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/19 As regards inconsistencies, Member States have been informed of these and were asked to update these cases by sending digital updates. 
4.11.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 269/19 Nr det gller inkonsekvenser har medlemsstaterna informerats om dessa och ombetts att aktualisera dessa renden elektroniskt.
In meetings of Article 280 Working group, Cocolaf and the Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ explanation and ÔtrainingŐ concerning the ECR (Electronic Case Registry) database were given to Member States. 
I mten i artikel 280-arbetsgruppen, Rdgivande kommittn fr samordning av bedrgeribekmpningen samt gruppen ÓOegentligheter och msesidigt bistnd Đ JordbruksprodukterÓ fick medlemsstaterna frklaringar och ÓutbildningÓ gllande ECR-databasen (Electronic Case Registry).
In general it can be said that Member States have improved the reporting of irregularities, but not all obligations of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 are completely complied with. 
Generellt kan det sgas att medlemsstaterna har frbttrat sin rapportering av oegentligheter, men inte helt uppfyllt alla skyldigheter i frordning (EEG) nr 595/91.
As regards discrepancies, the Commission will continue its efforts to oblige Member States to respect all provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 in order to receive within the delays provided for fully reliable data which contain homogeneous information from all Member States. 
Nr det gller bristande verensstmmelse kommer kommissionen att fortstta sina anstrngningar fr att f medlemsstaterna att respektera bestmmelserna i frordning nr 595/91 fr att inom faststllda tidsfrister f in helt tillfrlitliga data med enhetliga uppgifter frn alla medlemsstaterna.
The updated rate of recovery was established at 20,2 % in May 2004 (see paragraph 30). 
Den aktualiserade tervinningsgraden faststlldes till 20,2 % i maj 2004 (se punkt 30).
The Commission is fully aware of the fact that the recovery rate in Member States is not optimal and has undertaken to improve it, in particular with the creation of the Task Force Recovery (see also answer to paragraph V). 
Kommissionen r fullt medveten om att tervinningsgraden i medlemsstaterna inte r optimal och har tagit sig att frbttra den, frmst genom att bilda arbetsgruppen fr tervinning (se ven svaret p avsnitt V).
Paying agencies and administrative bodies in charge of the recovery process in some Member States (Italy and Greece) have always claimed that they had to wait for the outcome of judicial criminal procedures before proceeding with the recovery, whereas the choice of a recovery process through a civil or administrative procedure is in some cases possible and does not preclude the launching of a parallel criminal judicial procedure. 
Utbetalningsstllen och administrativa organ som ansvarar fr tervinningen i vissa medlemsstater (Italien, Grekland) har alltid hvdat att de varit tvungna att invnta utslagen frn brottmls-frfaranden innan de kan fortstta med tervinningen. I vissa renden r det dock mjligt att f till stnd en tervinning genom ett civilrttsligt eller administrativt frfarande, vilket inte utesluter att ett parallellt brottmlsfrfarande kan igngsttas.
For a limited number of Member States, administrative recovery procedures can be launched only after a final decision in the criminal judicial procedure if any, bearing in mind that the latter might take 15 years or more. 
Fr ett begrnsat antal medlemsstater kan administrativa tervinningsfrfaran-den inledas endast efter ett slutgiltigt beslut i brottmlsfrfaran-det, om ett sdant pbrjats, varvid man br komma ihg att det sistnmnda kan ta 15 r eller mer.
In Italy, for the pre-1995 cases, 46 % were subject to a criminal procedure whereas this percentage represented 18 % only for the cases posterior to 1995, which could be explained by the Member States deciding to take the necessary administrative steps as early as possible and as soon as there was a notification of the irregularity. 
I Italien var 46 % av rendena frn fre 1995 freml fr ett brottmlsfrfarande medan denna procentandel endast utgjorde 18 % av rendena efter 1995, vilket skulle kunna frklaras med att landet beslutar att vidta ndvndiga administrativa tgrder s tidigt som mjligt och s snart det frelg en anmlan om oegentligheten.
In shared management, the Member State responsible is in direct contact with the debtors. 
Vid delad frvaltning r den ansvariga medlemsstaten i direktkontakt med gldenrerna.
The Commission is not in a position to write off debts. 
Kommissionen har inte mjlighet att avskriva skulder.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 the Commission is legally obliged to exclude all expenditure from Community financing where that expenditure has not been executed in compliance with Community rules. 
I enlighet med frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 r kommissionen rttsligen frpliktigad att utesluta alla utgifter frn gemenskapsfinansiering som inte verkstllts i verensstmmelse med gemenskapsbestmmelserna.
Accepting compromise settlements and/or partial payments should be assessed on a case-by-case approach on the basis of national law and in conjunction with the criteria as laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999. 
Nr kompromissuppgrelser och/eller delvisa betalningar skall godtas br bedmningen ske frn fall till fall p basis av nationell lagstiftning och de kriterier som anges i artikel 8 i frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999.
V. Following the Communication of the Commission entitled ÔImproving the recovery of Community entitlements arising from direct and shared management of Community expenditureŐ of 3 December 2002 (COM(2002) 671 final), the Commission decided to set up a joint OLAF-Directorate-General for Agriculture Task Force Recovery in order to clear the burden of the past, i.e. all the irregularity cases prior to 1999 and still open in order to prepare a decision on whether the Community or the Member State bears the financial consequences. 
V. Omedelbart efter sitt meddelande ÓAtt frbttra inkasseringen av gemenskapens fordringar i samband med direkt och delad frvaltning av gemenskapens utgifterÓ av den 3 december 2002 (KOM(2002) 671 slutlig) beslt kommissionen att bilda en arbetsgrupp fr tervinning, gemensam fr OLAF och GD Jordbruk, fr att avveckla gamla fordringar, dvs. alla fortfarande oavslutade renden gllande oegentligheter frn tiden fre 1999, i syfte att frbereda ett beslut om huruvida gemenskapen eller medlemsstaten skall st fr de ekonomiska fljderna.