GENERAL COURT (2014) GENERAL COURT (2015) 2 Procedure (type of closure) Subject matter Duration of the case Appeal (judgment) Staff regulations 24.3 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 41.5 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 38.5 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 37.1 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 35.3 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 33.4 months Direct action (judgment) State aid 46.3 months Direct action (judgment) Competition 45.8 months Direct action (judgment) State aid 43.0 months Appeal (order) Staff regulations 24.1 months Intellectual property (order) Intellectual property and trademark 31.9 months Direct action (order) State aid 45.6 months Direct action (order) State aid 44.8 months Direct action (order) Environment 33.8 months Direct action (judgment) State aid 24.5 months Procedure (type of closure) Subject matter Duration of the case Appeal (judgment) Staff regulations 31.2 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 39.6 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 38.0 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 35.8 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 33.1 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 31.2 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 30.1 months Direct action (judgment) Restrictive measures 41.1 months Direct action (judgment) Commercial policy and dumping 41.0 months Direct action (judgment) Research and development 40.6 months Appeal (order) Staff regulations 15.6 months Intellectual property (order) Intellectual property and trademark 33.3 months Direct action (order) REACH regulation 30.9 months Direct action (order) Environment 24.8 months Intellectual property (judgment) Intellectual property and trademark 17.8 months Source: ECA. ANNEX II Analysis of factors affecting the duration of the 60 sampled cases at the CJEU Factors influencing the duration of the written procedure at the Court of Justice (indicated by the Registry) 1 Factors influencing the duration of the procedure during the written procedure Number of cases concerned (out of 30 ca se s) Total (%) Translations expected from the institutions that are parties to the proceedings 10 33% Workload of DG Translation 5 17% Granting one or several applications to intervene 4 13% Request to produce documents sent to the parties 4 13% Extension of a time-limit at the request of a party 3 10% Admission of a second exchange of pleadings (reply/rejoinder) 3 10% Consultation of the parties on the subject of a stage of the procedure (for example the joining of cases) 2 7% Introduction of a cross-appeal /cross claim 1 3% Translations of very long procedural documents 1 3% 
BILAGA II Analys av faktorer som pverkade handlggningstiden fr de 60 utvalda mlen vid EU-domstolen Faktorer som pverkade tidstgngen fr det skriftliga frfarandet vid domstolen (angivna av kansliet) 1 Faktorer som pverkade handlggningstiden under det skriftliga frfarandet Antal berrda ml (av 30 ml) Totalt (%) versttningar frvntas inkomma frn institutioner som r part i mlet 10 33% Arbetsbelastning p generaldirektoratet fr versttning 5 17% Godknnande av en eller flera interventionsanskningar 4 13% Begran om ingivande av handlingar skickas till parterna 4 13% Frlngning av en tidsfrist p begran av en part 3 10% Medgivande av en andra skriftvxling (replik/duplik) 3 10% Samrd med parterna om innebrden av ett steg i frfarandet (till exempel frening av ml) 2 7% Ingivande av ett anslutningsverklagande/anslutningsyrkande 1 3% versttning av mycket lnga rttegngshandlingar 1 3%