natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For example, if the definition of forest area used by Ireland were to be applied, the total EU forested area would be roughly 5 % less, whereas if the Luxembourg definition were to be applied the forest area would be approximately 3 % (3) more. 
Om till exempel Irlands definition av skogsomrden tillmpas blir den totala EU-arealen skog omkring 5 % mindre. Om dremot Luxemburgs definition tillmpas blir skogsarealen omkring 3 % strre (3).
One of the objectives of EU forest support is (1) The FAO final report on Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) issued in 1995 set a forest definition at 20 per cent crown cover density for industrialised countries and 10 % for developing countries. 
Ett av mlen fr EU:s (1) I FAO:s slutrapport om den globala skogsinventeringen (Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) frn 1995 definieras skogsareal som ett omrde med 20 procents krontckning fr industrilnderna och som ett omrde med 10 procents krontckning fr utvecklingslnderna.
(2) Study on European Forestry Information and Communication System (EFICS) 1997. 
(2) Underskning av det europeiska informations-och kommunikationssystemet fr skogsbruk (EFICS) 1997.
(3) Reference UN/FAO Report ÔForest ResourcesŐ year 2000, p. 
(3) Se FN/FAO-rapporten ÓForest ResourcesÓ, 2000, s.
34. the extension of wooded land, however in the absence of a commonly applied definition, the extent to which the objective is achieved is difficult to monitor. The shared management for implementing the forest strategy is not clear 19. 
34. skogsstd r en utvidgning av skogsarealen. Eftersom det saknas en allmnt vedertagen definition r det dock svrt att kontrollera i vilken omfattning mlet uppns. Oklar ansvarsfrdelning vid strategins genomfrande 19.
The management of the EU Forestry Strategy is shared between the Commission and the Member States. 
Ansvaret fr EU:s skogsbruksstrategi r uppdelat mellan kommissionen och medlemsstaterna.
The different responsibilities for implementation of the strategy under the rural development regulation are: (a) level I: the Strategy was proposed by the Commission (4) (and then adopted by the Council); this took account of the international commitments and the main concepts of sustainability and multi-functionality; (b) level II: in line with the principle of subsidiarity, the Member States are responsible for planning and implementing national forest programmes or equivalent instruments; (4) The Commission Communication was prepared on the basis of a specific request of the European Parliament (A4-0414/96, OJ C 55, 24.2.1997, p. 
De olika ansvarsomrdena fr strategins genomfrande r enligt frordningen om landsbygdens utveckling fljande: a) Niv 1: Kommissionen lade fram frslaget till strategi (4) (som drefter antogs av rdet); i frslaget beaktades internationella taganden och huvudbegreppen hllbarhet och mngfunktionalitet. b) Niv 2: Medlemsstaterna r enligt subsidiaritetsprincipen ansvariga fr planering och genomfrande av nationella skogsprogram eller likvrdiga instrument.
18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 67/9 (c) (d) level III: forestry measures are co-financed by Member States and the Community budget under the terms of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, which defines the structure and requirements of the forestry measures; level IV: individual projects are authorised and managed by the national, regional or local authorities of the Member States. 
18.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 67/9 c) d) Niv 3: Skogsbrukstgrder medfinansieras av medlemsstaterna och gemenskapsbudgeten enligt villkoren i frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999 dr skogsbrukstgrdernas struktur och krav faststlls.
A study (4), co-financed by the Commission, which aimed at providing policy makers with improved means to formulate and implement national forest programmes, examined the existence of such programmes in the Member States. 
I en underskning (4), som medfinansierades av kommissionen och som avsg att ge beslutsfattare bttre mjligheter att utforma och genomfra nationella skogsprogram, undersktes frekomsten av sdana program i medlemsstaterna.
This revealed that the availability and content of such programmes varied widely. 
Det visade sig att tillgngen p och innehllet i sdana program varierade betydligt.
The study observes that, even by 2001, some Member States did not have such programmes, others were developing them and, only a few were already implementing them. 
I underskningen framgick det att s sent som 2001 hade vissa medlemsstater inte ngra sdana program alls, medan andra hll p att ta fram dem och enbart ett ftal hade brjat genomfra dem.
Indeed, it was only in April 2003 that a common approach to defining the principles of national forest programmes was decided (5). 
Inte frrn i april 2003 antogs ett gemensamt synstt p hur principerna fr de nationella skogsprogrammen (5) skall faststllas.
The study identified the existence of many actors and the vagueness of the concept of sustainability as being amongst the causes of this situation. 
I underskningen faststlls det att dessa frhllanden bland annat orsakas av att det finns mnga aktrer och att begreppet hllbarhet r oklart.
In the absence of forestry programmes, the Regulation allows forestry support to be based on equivalent instruments (6). 
Om det inte finns ngra skogsbruksprogram r det enligt frordningen tilltet att basera skogsbruksstden p likvrdiga instrument (6).
The Regulation clearly states that the instrument should be equivalent and thus constitute and justify the link between the EU forestry strategy and the national forestry measures, co-financed by the EU. 
I frordningen anges tydligt att instrumentet mste vara likvrdigt och p s stt utgra och motivera sambandet mellan EU:s skogsbruksstrategi och de nationella skogsbrukstgrder som medfinansieras av EU.
Rural development plans (RDP) and operational programmes (OP) have been accepted by the Commission as being equivalent to forestry programmes. 
Kommissionen har godknt planer fr landsbygdens utveckling och operativa program som likvrdiga med skogsbruksprogrammen.
However, RDP establish the relationship between various rural development measures in order to implement rural development policy. 
I planer fr landsbygdens utveckling faststlls emellertid frhllandet mellan olika landsbygdsutvecklingstgrder s att politiken p omrdet kan genomfras.
They generally do not focus on forestry but on other agricultural priorities, which indeed, absorb most of the financial resources. 
De r i allmnhet inte inriktade p skogsbruk, utan p andra jordbruksprioriteringar som utan tvekan absorberar huvuddelen av de ekonomiska resurserna.
While forestry programmes focus on forest-related priorities including the implementation of the strategy, forestry measures as set out in RDPs tend to be marginal, as compared to the more agriculturally orientated measures in the second pillar of the CAP. 
I skogsbruksprogrammen prioriteras omrden som frmst rr skogen, dribland genomfrandet av strategin, men i planerna fr landsbygdens utveckling fr skogsbrukstgrderna en underordnad betydelse i frhllande till de mer jordbruksinriktade tgrder som ingr i GJP:s andra pelare.
Furthermore the CommissionŐs assessment of the equivalent instruments was affected by both: time constraints and internal organisation as explained hereunder. 
Kommissionens bedmning av de likvrdiga instrumenten pverkades av svl tidspress som av den interna organisationen, vilket frklaras nedan.
(4) Source: ÔNational forest programmes in European countries: an initial overview based on a quick survey in countries participating in the COST E-19 ActionŐ page 11. 
(4) Klla: ÓNational forest programmes in European countries: an initial overview based on a quick survey in countries participating in the COST E-19 ActionÓ, s. 11.
(5) Fourth Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (Vienna, April 2003). 
(5) Fjrde ministerkonferensen om skydd av Europas skogar (Wien, april 2003).
(6) Article 29(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. 
(6) Artikel 29.4 i frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999.
20. ply with the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, for which the Commission has financial responsibility (1), including the assessment of their soundness (efficient, effective, economic) whilst Member States are responsible for drawing-up and implementing the national programmes which apply the measures (2). 
20. uppfylla kraven i frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999; kommissionen r ekonomiskt ansvarig fr tgrderna (1), dribland bedmningen av om de r lmpliga (effektiva, ndamlsenliga, ekono-miska), medan medlemsstaterna ansvarar fr utformningen och genomfrandet av de nationella program inom vilka tgrderna tillmpas (2).
The audit found that neither the Commission nor the Member States assumed responsibility for assessing whether a project contributed to the achievement of the EU forestry strategy. 
Vid granskningen framkom det att varken kommissionen eller medlemsstaterna tog ansvar fr att bedma huruvida ett projekt bidrog till att uppfylla EU:s skogsbruksstrategi.
Furthermore, national administrations did not systematically assess whether a project approved for EU co-financing was coherent with the strategy and its objectives. 
Nationella myndigheter utvrderade inte heller regelbundet huruvida ett projekt som godknts fr medfinansiering av EU verensstmde med strategin och dess ml.
There is a need to clarify the responsibilities and roles of the Commission and the Member States in implementing the strategy not only in order to generally strengthen effective management but also to maximise the impact of EU funding on forestry. 
Kommissionens och medlemsstaternas ansvar och roller vid strategins genomfrande mste klargras, inte bara fr att gra frvaltningen mer ndamlsenlig generellt sett, utan fr att EU-stdet till skogsbruket skall f s stort genomslag som mjligt.
It will also assist the Commission in complying fully with the legal requirements of financial accountability for implementing the budget. 
Klargrandet skulle ocks bidra till att kommissionen fullt ut kan uppfylla de rttsliga kraven p ekonomisk ansvarsskyldighet fr budgetens genomfrande.
NATIONAL FOREST PROGRAMMES (NFP) OR EQUIVALENT INSTRUMENTS 23. 
NATIONELLA INSTRUMENT SKOGSPROGRAM ELLER LIKVRDIGA Medlemsstaternas skogsbrukstgrder mste drmed 23.
As indicated in paragraph 19(a) and as stipulated in the basic Regulation on support for rural development (3), from 1999, Member States were required to base their forestry rural development measures on national or subnational forest programmes or equivalent instruments. 
Ssom anges i punkt 19 a ovan och i grundfrordningen om std till landsbygdens utveckling (3) frn 1999 r medlemsstaterna skyldiga att basera sina skogsbrukstgrder fr landsbygdsutveckling p nationella eller subnationella skogsprogram eller likvrdiga instrument.
(1) Article 274 of the EC Treaty: ÔThe Commission shall implement the budget, in accordance with the provisions of the regulations made pursuant to Article 279, on its own responsibility and within the limits of the appropriations, having regard to the principles of sound financial management. 
(1) Artikel 274 i EG-frdraget: ÓI verensstmmelse med principerna fr en sund ekonomisk frvaltning skall kommissionen genomfra budgeten under eget ansvar och inom ramen fr de beviljade anslagen enligt bestmmelserna i den budgetfrordning som utfrdats enligt artikel 279.
Member States shall cooperate with the Commission to ensure that the appropriations are used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management.Ő (2) According to Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999, support shall be based Ôon national or subnational forest programmes or equivalent instruments which should take into account the commitments made in the Ministerial Conferences on the protection of forests in EuropeŐ. 
Medlemsstaterna skall samarbeta med kommissionen fr att skerstlla att anslagen anvnds i verensstmmelse med principerna fr en sund ekonomisk frvaltning.Ó (2) Enligt artikel 29 i frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999 skall stdet baseras p Ónationella och subnationella skogsprogram eller likvrdiga instrument i vilka de taganden som har gjorts vid ministerkonferenserna om det europeiska skogsskyddet br beaktasÓ.
(3) Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. 
(3) Artikel 29 i frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999.
C 67/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 18.3.2005 30. 
C 67/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 18.3.2005 30.
According to the legislation (1), both the RDP and the OP had to be submitted by the national authorities to the Commission by the end of 1999. 
Enligt lagstiftningen (1) var de nationella myndigheterna lagda att senast vid utgngen av 1999 lmna in sina planer fr landsbygdens utveckling och operativa program till kommissionen.
The programming period started on 1 January 2000. 
Programplaneringsperioden inleddes den 1 januari 2000.
At the end 1999 and the beginning 2000 the Commission had an extremely heavy workload and for several months the CommissionŐs units had to assess large quantities of documents in a very short period (2). 
I slutet av 1999 och brjan av 2000 var kommissionens arbetsbrda extremt stor, och kommissionens enheter tvingades under flera mnader ta stllning till stora mngder dokument p mycket kort tid (2).
Often extensive discussions and negotiations took place between the Commission and the national authorities before the approval of plans. 
Godknnandet av planerna fregicks ofta av omfattande diskussioner och frhandlingar mellan kommissionen och de nationella myndigheterna.
Forestry measures were just one of the topics of the discussion and numerous amendments followed. 
Skogsbrukstgrderna var bara ett av mnga mnen som diskuterades och ett stort antal ndringar fick gras.
The approval process took more than a year for most Member States and programmes and plans were approved as late as 2001. 
Godknnandeprocessen tog ver ett r fr flertalet medlemsstater, och program och planer godkndes s sent som 2001.
One of the reasons for this is that many different DGs and units are involved in the CommissionŐs approval process of the RDP and OP (3) and thus in the approval of forestry measures. 
En anledning till detta r att mnga olika generaldirektorat och enheter r involverade i kommissionens process fr godknnande av planer fr landsbygdens utveckling och operativa program (3) och drmed i godknnandet av skogsbrukstgrder.
In total more than eight units within DG Agriculture and seven other DGŐs (e. g. Environment, Energy and Transport, Health and Consumer Protection) are involved in forest related issues. 
Sammanlagt ver tta enheter inom generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk och sju andra generaldirektorat (exempelvis milj, energi och transport, hlsa och konsumentskydd) r involverade i skogsrelaterade frgor.
128). Commission information on forestry action at Member State level is still incomplete 34. 
Denna splittring av skogsrelaterade frgor p s mnga olika avdelningar Kommissionens information om medlemsstaternas skogsbrukstgrder r fortfarande ofullstndig 34.
In order to assess the coherence with the EU-financed forestry measures, the Commission needs information on those forestry measures in the Member States which are not financed by the EU budget. 
Fr att kunna bedma verensstmmelsen med de EU-finansierade skogsbrukstgrderna behver kommissionen information om de skogsbrukstgrder i medlemsstaterna som inte finansieras via EU:s budget.
However this information was not available to the Commission when Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 was proposed and adopted and is still lacking. 
Kommissionen hade emellertid inte tillgng till denna information nr frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999 lades fram och antogs, och informationen saknas fortfarande.
According to the Commission, Member States themselves do not have an inventory of the different forestry measures. 
Enligt kommissionen inventerar inte heller medlemsstaterna sjlva de olika skogsbrukstgrderna.
The Commission is required to be notified of State Aid in forestry (and other) sectors and the unit responsible for forestry in DG Agriculture receives a copy of the information sent by Member States. 
Kommissionen skall informeras om statligt std inom skogsbruket och vriga sektorer, och den enhet vid generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk som ansvarar fr skogsbruk fr en kopia av den information som medlemsstaterna lmnat.
An EU financed research project (coordinated by the European Forestry Institute) aims to obtain more reliable knowledge of the public funding of the forest sector and first results should become available in the course of the year 2004. 
Ett EU-finansierat forskningsprojekt (samordnat av European Forestry Institute) har inletts i syfte att f mer tillfrlitlig kunskap om den offentliga finansieringen av skogssektorn, och de frsta resultaten br vara tillgngliga under 2004.
Such basic information on the existing financial instruments and their effects should be an essential prerequisite before launching any additional EU funding. 
Sdan grundlggande information om befintliga finansiella instrument och deras inverkan borde vara en ndvndig frutsttning fr att ytterligare EU-finansiering skall pbrjas.
LARGE UPTAKE OF FUNDS FROM PREVIOUS PROGRAMMING PERIOD 37. 
F RRA PROGRAMPLANERINGSPERIODEN TAR EN STOR ANDEL AV MEDLEN I ANSPRK 37.
Because of the long contract period for forestry, there is little freedom to manoeuvre: much of the money available has in practice already been allocated in the form of CAP accompanying measures as detailed below. 
P grund av den lnga kon-traktperioden fr skogsbruket r manverutrymmet litet Đ en stor del av de tillgngliga medlen har i praktiken redan anslagits i form av kompletterande GJP-tgrder, vilket beskrivs mer ingende nedan.
Afforestation contracts established before 2000 (when the measure was funded as an accompanying measure under the CAP reform) and running for a maximum of 20 years, have taken up considerable funds for the afforestation measure as part of rural development. 
Avsevrda anslag fr beskogningstgrder inom landsbygdens utveckling har gtt till beskogningskontrakt som ingicks fre 2000 (d tgrden finansierades som en kompletterande tgrd inom GJP-reformen) och som har en lptid p hgst 20 r.
Indeed, in the period 2000 to 2002, most of the funds allocated to afforestation in the programming period 2000 to 2006 were spent on previous contracts under accompanying measure arrangements. 
Under perioden 2000Đ2002 togs huvuddelen av de medel som anslagits till beskogning under programplaneringsperioden 2000Đ2006 i ansprk av gamla kontrakt som ingtts inom ramen fr kompletterande tgrder.
Thus, although environmental constraints have been considerably reinforced in the new programming period, no additional environmental benefits can be identified as yet, because in general, the less-strict commitments contracted before 2000 apply to most of the funds used. 
Trots att miljkraven har skrpts betydligt i den nya programplaneringsperioden kan drfr inga ytterligare miljfrdelar nnu faststllas, eftersom huvuddelen av de medel som utnyttjas generellt sett omfattas av de mindre strnga krav som gllde fre 2000. inom kommissionen beslutsfattandet. frsvrar samstmdheten och 33.
18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 67/11 39. 
18.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 67/11 39.
The seven years of the current programming period is ill-fitted for afforestation contracts which can and frequently do last 20 years. 
Programplaneringsperiodernas nuvarande lptid p sju r r dligt anpassad till beskogningskontrakt som kan ha, och ofta har, en lptid p 20 r.
The entitlement of the beneficiary, in particular, to an annual premium for each hectare to cover a supposed loss of income for a period of up to 20 years greatly exceeds the financing resources available in the programmes. 
Inte minst medfr stdmottagarens rtt till ett srskilt rligt belopp per hektar fr att under en period p upp till 20 r tcka ett frmodat inkomstbortfall att programmens finansieringsresurser kraftigt verskrids.
A COMPLEX SYSTEM Creating difficulties for managing authorities and beneficiaries 40. 
ETT KOMPLICERAT SYSTEM Svrigheter fr ansvariga myndigheter och stdmottagare 40.
Financing arrangements are complex as indicated in paragraph 5. 
Finansieringsstrukturen r komplicerad, vilket ocks nmnts i punkt 5.
The requirement for managing authorities to use two sets of rules constitutes a significant and unnecessary complication. 
Att ansvariga myndigheter mste anvnda sig av tv regeluppsttningar r en betydande och ondig komplikation.
Checks on operations to be carried out by the Member State differ depending on whether the operations were financed by the Guarantee Section of EAGGF or by the Guidance section (1). 
Medlemsstaternas kontroll av verksamheten varierar beroende p om verksamheten finansieras av EUGFJ-garanti eller EUGFJ-utveckling (1).
At the Salzburg conference on rural development this delivery system was criticised by various stakeholders (2). 
Vid konferensen i Salzburg om landsbygdens utveckling kritiserade olika aktrer detta genomfrandesystem (2).
(1) EAGGF Guarantee: the Commission Regulation (EC) No 817/2004 (OJ L 153, 30.4.2004, p. 
(1) EUGFJ-garanti: I artikel 69 i kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 817/2004 (EUT L 153, 30.4.2004, s.
30) on support for rural development from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) sets out in Article 69 that on-the-spot checks shall cover at least 5 % of beneficiaries each year and all the different types of rural development measures set out in the programming documents. 
30) om std frn Europeiska utvecklings-och garantifonden fr jordbruket (EUGFJ) till utveckling av landsbygden anges att kontroller p plats skall omfatta minst 5 % av stdmottagarna varje r och avse samtliga typer av tgrder fr utveckling av landsbygden som anges i programdokumenten.
On-the-spot checks shall be spread over the year on the basis of an analysis of the risks presented by each rural development measure. 
Kontrollerna p plats skall spridas ver ret i enlighet med en riskanalys fr varje tgrd fr utveckling av landsbygden.
Checks shall cover all the commitments and obligations of a beneficiary which can be checked at the time of the visit. 
Kontrollerna skall avse en stdmottagares alla taganden och skyldigheter som kan kontrolleras vid besket.
They shall be made in accordance with Title III of Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001. 
De skall utfras i enlighet med avdelning III i frordning (EG) nr 2419/2001.
EAGGF Guidance: Commission Regulation (EC) No 438/2001 (OJ L 63, 3.3.2001, p. 
EUGFJ-utveckling: I kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 438/2001 (EGT L 63, 3.3.2001, s.
21) (on Structural Funds Management) sets out (Article 10) that ÔMember States shall organise checks on operations on an appropriate sampling basis, designed in particular to: (a) verify the effectiveness of the management and control systems in place; (b) verify selectively, on the basis of risk analysis, expenditure declarations made at the various levels concerned. 
21) (om frvaltning av strukturfonderna) anges (i artikel 10) fljande: ÓMedlemsstaterna skall genomfra kontroller p ett lmpligt urval av insatser srskilt fr att a) kontrollera att frvaltnings-och kontrollsystemen r effektiva, b) selektivt, p grundval av en riskanalys, kontrollera de utgiftsdeklarationer som upprttats p olika berrda niver.
The checks carried out before the winding-up of each assistance shall cover at least 5 % of the total eligible expenditure and be based on a representative sample of the operations approved, taking account of the requirements of paragraph 3. 
De kontroller som genomfrs innan en stdform avslutas skall omfatta tminstone 5 % av de totala stdberttigande utgifterna och grundas p ett representativt urval av godknda insatser, med beaktande av kraven i punkt 3.