natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Annual Work Programme 2006 has been prepared in a format which meets the needs of Article 40 of the Framework FR, setting the key activities, objectives, tasks, output, performance indicators, and outcome/impact of the work of the Centre. 
Det rliga arbetsprogrammet 2006 har utarbetats i ett format som uppfyller kraven i artikel 40 i rambudgetfrordningen dr huvudverksamhet, ml, arbetsuppgifter, resultat, resultatindikatorer och resultat/konsekvenser av centrumets arbete.
An inventory management application has been procured and is currently configured and installed. 
Ett datorprogram fr inventariefrvaltning har kpts in och konfigureras och installeras fr nrvarande.
An inventory count is planned to be performed in the last quarter of the year, as soon as the application has been installed and the preparatory works have been finalised. 
Centrumet planerar att genomfra en inventering under rets sista kvartal s snart datorprogrammet har installerats och det frberedande arbetet avslutats.
In February 2006, the financial workflows were changed to improve internal controls over transactions and adhere to the requirements of the FR. 
I februari 2006 ndrades de finansiella arbetsfldena fr att frbttra interna kontroller ver transaktioner och flja kraven i budgetfrordningen.
The abovementioned changes have been documented in a series of Instruction Notes signed by the Director, after consultation of the Accounting Officer and the Internal Auditor of the EUMC. 
De ovan nmnda ndringarna har dokumenterats i en rad meddelanden med anvisningar som direktren undertecknat efter samrd med centrumets rkenskapsfrare och internrevisor.
The new workflows were tested in a test SI2 universe and the validation of the test is documented. 
De nya arbetsfldena testades i SI2 och valideringen av testet dokumenterades.
Whilst the EUMCŐs staffing table foresees a total of only 37 posts, it is very difficult and, in some cases impossible, to constitute boards with agents having at least the same grade of the position to be filled. 
Eftersom centrumets tjnstefrteckning endast innehller 37 tjnster s r det mycket svrt, i vissa fall omjligt, att stta samman urvalskommitter med tjnstemn som har minst samma grad som den tjnst som skall tillsttas.
The Centre will consider improving the clarity of information provided in the call for tenders and shall apply the method of Ôprice/qualityŐ ratio where it is deemed to be appropriate. 
Centrumet kommer att tnka p att den information som lmnas i anbudsinfordringarna skall vara tydligare och metoden med att mta kostnadseffektiviteten kommer att anvndas nr s anses lmpligt.
EN 2019 ECA remarks in brief on the Commission's legislative proposals for the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) February 2019 
SV 2019 Sammanfattning av Europeiska revisionsrttens synpunkter p kommissionens lagstiftningsfrslag om nsta flerriga budgetram februari 2019
Contents President’s foreword 4 Our remarks on the Commission’s proposal for the 2021-2027 MFF 6 General issues – what did we say? 6 Were spending priorities based on strategic considerations? 
Innehllsfrteckning Inledning av ordfranden 4 Vra synpunkter p kommissionens frslag till flerrig budgetram fr 2021Đ2027 6 Allmnna frgor Đ vad sa vi? 6 Baserades utgiftsprioriteringar p strategiska vervganden?
6 What changes are proposed to improve budgetary flexibility and the allocation of funding? 
7 Vilka frndringar fresls fr att frbttra budgetens flexibilitet och frdelningen av medel?
7 How convincing is the emphasis on simplification and performance? 
7 Hur vertygande r tonvikten p frenkling och prestation?
8 How would accountability be improved? 
8 Hur skulle ansvarsskyldigheten frbttras?
8 Revenue – what did we say? 
8 Inkomster Đ vad sa vi?
9 Spending – what did we say? 
9 Utgifter Đ vad sa vi?
10 Research and innovation 11 Cohesion 12 Agriculture and natural resources 14 Neighbourhood, development and international cooperation 16 InvestEU 17 Cross-cutting aspects – what did we say? 
10 Forskning och innovation 11 Sammanhllning 12 Jordbruk och naturresurser 14 Grannskapspolitik, utvecklingssamarbete och internationellt samarbete 16 InvestEU 17 vergripande aspekter Đ vad sa vi?
19 Safeguarding the rule of law 19 Fight against fraud and corruption 20 Assessing the impact of legislation: the “better regulation” principle 21 Conditions not yet in place for the attestation engagement approach 23 Reinforcing the independent external audit function of bodies set up by the European Union 24 Background information 25 The 2021-2027 MFF package – 51 legislative proposals 25 The MFF legislative procedure 25 Timing 25 Our role in the MFF legislative procedure 27 Annexes 30 2 
19 Skyddet av rttsstatsprincipen 19 Kampen mot bedrgerier och korruption 20 Bedmning av lagstiftningens effekter: principen om Óbttre lagstiftningÓ 21 Villkoren fr bestyrkandemetoden nnu inte uppfyllda 23 Frstrkning av den oberoende funktionen fr extern revision av organ som upprttas av Europeiska unionen 24 Bakgrundsinformation 25 Paketet om den flerriga budgetramen 2021Đ2027 Đ 51 lagstiftningsfrslag 25 Lagstiftningsfrfarandet fr den flerriga budgetramen 25 Tidsplan 26 Vr roll i lagstiftningsfrfarandet fr den flerriga budgetramen 27 2
Annex I: Overview of the Commission’s legislative proposals in relation to the MFF package 30 Annex II: Commission’s proposal for the 2021-2027 MFF — Proposed changes to the EU 7-year budget 37 Annex III: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) — the legal basis for ECA opinions 38 3 
Bilagor 30 Bilaga I Ń versikt ver kommissionens lagstiftningsfrslag om paketet om den flerriga budgetramen 30 Bilaga II Ń Kommissionens frslag till flerrig budgetram 2021Đ 2027 Ń freslagna ndringar av EU:s sjursbudget 36 Bilaga III Ń Frdraget om Europeiska unionens funktionsstt (EUF-frdraget) Đ den rttsliga grunden fr revisionsrttens yttranden 37 3
President’s foreword The following pages summarise the main remarks that the European Court of Auditors submitted to the EU’s co-legislators — the European Parliament and the Council — for them to consider when discussing and deciding upon the Commission’s legislative proposals for the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF). 
Inledning av ordfranden P de fljande sidorna sammanfattas de viktigaste synpunkter som Europeiska revisionsrtten har lmnat till EU:s medlagstiftare Đ Europaparlamentet och rdet Đ fr vervgande nr de diskuterar och fattar beslut om kommissionens lagstiftningsfrslag om den flerriga budgetramen 2021Đ2027.
This publication provides a succinct overview of those contributions in relation to several areas of the budget. 
Denna publikation innehller en kortfattad versikt ver vra bidrag p flera av budgetens omrden.
It mainly draws on the opinions we issued on the Commission’s proposals during 2018, but also on our recent briefing papers and other reports dealing with EU finances, and on our cumulative experience. 
Den bygger framfr allt p de yttranden som vi avgav ver kommissionens frslag under 2018 men ocks p aktuella briefingdokument och andra rapporter om EU:s finanser liksom p vr samlade erfarenhet.
Our remarks focused in particular on the proposed process of setting spending priorities for the EU, the flexibility of the EU budget, the performance orientation and administrative simplification, as well as accountability and audit arrangements. 
Vra synpunkter gllde srskilt den freslagna processen fr att faststlla EU:s utgiftsprioriteringar, EU-budgetens flexibilitet, prestationsinriktningen och administrativ frenkling samt arrangemangen fr ansvarsskyldighet och revision.
We are bound to emphasise that, to be effective, parliamentary oversight should be based on robust accountability arrangements. 
Vi mste betona att en ndamlsenlig parlamentarisk kontroll krver solida arrangemang fr ansvarsskyldighet.
For this reason, we proposed that the European Court of Auditors, as a general rule, should be appointed as the external auditor for all bodies set up by the European Union. 
Drfr har vi freslagit att Europeiska revisionsrtten som allmn regel ska utses till extern revisor fr alla organ som upprttas av Europeiska unionen.
Our overall position is that we welcome the Commission’s efforts to modernise the EU budget for the post-2020 period. 
Generellt vlkomnar vi kommissionens anstrngningar att modernisera EU-budgeten till perioden efter 2020.
At the same time, in our opinions on the Commission’s legislative proposals and our reports we highlight several potential risks, identify a number of weaknesses and propose specific improvements. 
Samtidigt uppmrksammar vi i vra yttranden ver kommissionens lagstiftningsfrslag och vra rapporter flera potentiella risker. Vi identifierar ocks ett antal brister och freslr srskilda frbttringar.
Some of these improvements would require amendments to the basic legislative acts themselves, but the Commission could address many others when adopting delegated and 4 
En del av frbttringarna krver ndringar av de grundlggande rttsakterna, medan flera andra skulle kunna genomfras av kommissionen nr den antar delegerade akter och 4
implementing acts to put this legislation into practice. The Commission has seldom ever consulted the European Court of Auditors on non-legislative acts — even though they often contain key provisions affecting the regularity and effectiveness of EU spending. 
genomfrandeakter fr att genomfra lagstiftningen. Kommissionen har sllan bett Europeiska revisionsrtten yttra sig ver icke-lagstiftningsakter, trots att de ofta innehller viktiga bestmmelser som pverkar EU-utgifternas korrekthet och ndamlsenlighet.
The Commission now aims to have the MFF legislative package adopted by the end of 2019, already well behind the original schedule. The timeline is therefore tight. 
Kommissionen har nu som ml att lagstiftningspaketet om den flerriga budgetramen ska antas fre utgngen av 2019, vilket innebr att man redan r kraftig frsenad jmfrt med den ursprungliga tidsplanen.
Experience from the 2014-2020 period has shown how difficult it is to catch up if there are delays in adopting the legislative framework. 
Erfarenheterna frn perioden 2014Đ2020 har visat hur svrt det r att hinna ikapp om antagandet av den rttsliga ramen frsenas.
We therefore encourage the European Parliament and the Council to reach a political agreement as early as possible so that implementation can start as soon as the programme period begins in 2021. 
Vi uppmanar drfr Europaparlamentet och rdet att n en politisk verenskommelse snarast s att genomfrandet kan pbrjas s snart programperioden inleds 2021.
Klaus-Heiner Lehne Pres ident 5 
Klaus-Heiner Lehne ordfrande 5
Our remarks on the Commission’s proposal for the 2021-2027 MFF General issues – what did we say? 
Vra synpunkter p kommissionens frslag till flerrig budgetram fr 2021Đ 2027 Allmnna frgor Đ vad sa vi?
It is important at all times to bear in mind that it is not our role to assess the proposed political priorities or allocation of funding in the new MFF. 
Det r viktigt att alltid ha i tanke att det inte r vr uppgift att bedma de freslagna politiska prioriteringarna eller den freslagna frdelningen av medel i den nya flerriga budgetramen.
We welcome the Commission’s proposal to closely align the structure of the budget and the allocation of resources with its political priorities and to focus spending on measures that demonstrably bring EU added value. 
Vi vlkomnar frslaget att budgetens struktur och frdelningen av resurser ska anpassas nrmare till kommissionens politiska prioriteringar och att utgifterna ska riktas in p tgrder som bevisligen ger ett europeiskt mervrde.
However, we note that the Commission started its financial planning negotiations for the 2021-2027 period despite the absence of a political agreement with and among Member States on the EU’s strategic objectives for the years to come. 
Vi konstaterar dock att kommissionen inledde sina frhandlingar om den finansiella planeringen fr perioden 2021Đ2027 utan en politisk verenskommelse med och mellan medlemsstaterna om EU:s strategiska ml fr de kommande ren.
The current strategy — “Europe 2020” — will end before the start of the new period. 
Den nuvarande strategin Ń Europa 2020 Ń upphr innan den nya perioden inleds.
As a result, the Commission’s proposal is a vehicle for shaping the EU’s political objectives after 2020, rather than a response to those objectives. 
Kommissionens frslag r drfr ett medel att forma EU:s politiska ml efter 2020 i stllet fr ett svar p dem.
We consider it important for the EU legislators to ensure throughout the MFF period that the EU’s financial planning takes due account of any changes to the objectives. 
Vi menar att det r viktigt att EU:s lagstiftare under hela budgetramsperioden skerstller att EU:s finansiella planering tar vederbrlig hnsyn till eventuella ndringar av mlen.
We would also observe that the Commission has yet to propose a robust concept of EU value added, which could then form the basis for a comprehensive assessment of the costs and benefits of EU membership. 
Vi vill ocks ppeka att kommissionen nnu inte har freslagit en hllbar definition av europeiskt mervrde som skulle kunna ligga till grund fr en samlad bedmning av kostnaderna fr och nyttan med EU-medlemskap.
What changes are proposed to improve budgetary flexibility and the allocation of funding? 
Vilka frndringar fresls fr att frbttra budgetens flexibilitet och frdelningen av medel?
The Commission makes several proposals that would increase the overall flexibility of the budget (such as raising the own resources ceiling, removing the limits on the margin between the MFF ceiling for annual payment appropriations and the payments executed in a given year, and setting up a reserve for unused commitments and decommitments ). 
Kommissionen lgger fram flera frslag som skulle ka budgetens flexibilitet totalt sett (t.ex. hjs taket fr egna medel, tas grnserna bort fr marginalen mellan taket i den flerriga budgetramen fr rliga betalningsbemyndiganden och de betalningar som verkstlls ett visst r samt inrttas en reserv fr outnyttjade och tillbakadragna tagandebemyndiganden).
From the point of view of sound financial management, we agree that these changes could make it easier to respond quickly and effectively to unforeseen demands. 
Med hnsyn till en sund ekonomisk frvaltning delar vi uppfattningen att dessa frndringar skulle kunna gra det enklare att reagera snabbt och ndamlsenligt p ofrutsedda krav.
We also note that the proposal to count special instruments — such as the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, the European Union Solidarity Fund, the Emergency Aid Reserve and the Flexibility Instrument — on top of the annual ceilings for payment appropriations would clarify the situation. 
Vi konstaterar ocks att frslaget att rkna srskilda instrument, ssom Europeiska fonden fr justering fr globaliseringseffekter, Europeiska unionens solidaritetsfond, reserven fr katastrofbistnd och flexibilitetsmekanism, utver de rliga taken fr betalningsbemyndiganden skulle klargra situationen.
As regards the evolution of spending for the 2021-2027 MFF, a number of factors (such as inflation and the budgetary impact of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU) need to be taken into account when making any comparison with the 2014-2020 MFF (see also Annex II). 
Vad betrffar utvecklingen av utgifterna under den flerriga budgetramen 2021Đ2027 mste ett antal faktorer (ssom inflation och budgeteffekten av Frenade kungarikets uttrde ur EU) beaktas nr eventuella jmfrelser grs med den flerriga budgetramen 2014Đ2020 (se ven bilaga II).
We also note that the Commission does not base its proposals for changes in spending priorities on an assessment of each area’s EU added value. 
Vi noterar ocks att kommissionen inte grundar sina frslag till ndringar av utgiftsprioriteringar p en bedmning av varje omrdes europeiska mervrde.
Lastly, the Commission should clarify the key assumptions behind the MFF proposal in a comprehensive financial plan. 
Till sist br kommissionen i en vergripande finansieringsplan klargra de viktigaste antagandena bakom frslaget till flerrig budgetram.
7 How convincing is the emphasis on simplification and performance? 27 
7 Hur vertygande r tonvikten p frenkling och prestation? 1 2 27
The Commission proposes to reduce the number of spending programmes and apply simplified rules. 
Kommissionen freslr att antalet utgiftsprogram ska minskas och att frenklade regler ska tillmpas.
Doing so would lessen the administrative burden for beneficiaries and national or regional authorities managing EU funds. 
Det skulle minska den administrativa brdan fr stdmottagare och nationella eller regionala myndigheter som frvaltar EU-medel.
We welcome the broad lines of these proposals. 
Vi vlkomnar huvuddragen i dessa frslag.
However, we believe that it is too early to assess whether measures of this kind will increase the efficiency of EU action. 
Vi anser dock att det r fr tidigt att bedma om tgrder av detta slag gr EU:s tgrder effektivare.
In particular, simplification should be used to eliminate unnecessary rules or procedures rather than just consolidating existing rulebooks. 
Frenkling br framfr allt anvndas fr att avskaffa ondiga regler eller frfaranden och inte fr att bara konsolidera befintliga regelverk.
In addition, particularly in shared management, the Commission will need to make sure that Member States’ rules strike the right balance between ease of implementation and ensuring that EU funds are spent correctly. 
Srskilt nr det gller delad frvaltning kommer kommissionen dessutom att behva se till att medlemsstaternas regler uppnr rtt balans mellan enkelt genomfrande och skerstllande av att EU:s medel anvnds korrekt.
The Commission also intends to strengthen the focus on performance in all spending programmes. 
Kommissionen avser ocks att frstrka inriktningen p prestation i alla utgiftsprogram.
In part, this would be done by setting clearer objectives and fewer, but higher-quality, performance indicators. 
Det ska delvis ske genom att tydligare ml och frre prestationsindikatorer, men av hgre kvalitet, faststlls.
However, we agree that it is essential to equip all programmes with a single strong performance framework that can be used consistently to monitor the effectiveness of EU spending. 
Vi instmmer dock i att det r ndvndigt att alla program har en gemensam, robust prestationsram som kan anvndas konsekvent fr att vervaka ndamlsenligheten i EU:s utgifter.
How would accountability be improved? 
Hur skulle ansvarsskyldigheten frbttras?
The Commission proposes a more coherent and transparent framework for its spending programmes. 
Kommissionen freslr en tydligare och mer sammanhllen ram fr sina utgiftsprogram.
It is essential that EU spending programmes conform to the highest standards of public accountability and transparency. 
Det r av vsentlig betydelse att EU:s utgiftsprogram uppfyller de hgsta kraven nr det gller offentlig ansvarsskyldighet och ppenhet.
In this regard, we advocate developing an overarching set of accountability principles, which could be included in the interinstitutional agreement accompanying the MFF proposal. 8 
I detta sammanhang rekommenderar vi att man tar fram en vergripande samling principer fr 8 ansvarsskyldighet som skulle kunna inkluderas i det interinstitutionella avtal som tfljer frslaget till flerrig budgetram.
Revenue – what did we say? 
Inkomster Đ vad sa vi?
This section summarises our remarks on the Commission’s legislative proposals for own resources, which were published, as part of the MFF package, on 2 May 2018. 
I detta avsnitt sammanfattar vi vra synpunkter p kommissionens lagstiftningsfrslag om egna medel, som offentliggjordes som en del av paketet om den flerriga budgetramen den 2 maj 2018.
9 — Briefing paper on the Commission’s proposal for the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework, published on 10 July 2018; — Opinion No 5/2018 on own resources, published on 11 October 2018 More details in our For the next MFF the Commission proposes to retain customs duties as one of the EU’s own resources, but at a lower collection rate for Member States. 
9 Ń briefingdokument om kommissionens frslag till flerrig budgetram fr 2021Đ 2027, som offentliggjordes den 10 juli 2018, Ń yttrande nr 5/2018 ver egna medel, som offentliggjordes den 11 oktober 2018. Fler uppgifter finns i vrt Till nsta flerriga budgetram freslr kommissionen att tullarna ska behllas som ett av EU:s egna medel, men med en lgre uppbrdskostnad fr medlemsstaterna.
It also proposes to retain the GNI-based resource as a significant source of revenue and simplify the calculation for contributions based on the VAT component. 
Den freslr ocks att de BNI-baserade egna medlen ska fortstta att vara en betydande inkomstklla och att berkningen av bidrag baserade p momsdelen ska frenklas.
Together, these three own resources would make up 87 % of EU revenue. 
Dessa tre egna medel skulle tillsammans utgra 87 % av EU:s inkomster.
In addition, three new own resources would be introduced, based on a new tax scheme for EU companies, the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and a tax on unrecycled plastic packaging. 
Tre nya egna medel ska dessutom infras, baserade p ett nytt skattesystem fr EU-fretag, EU:s utslppshandelssystem och icke-materialutnyttjat plastfrpackningsavfall.
Our overall conclusion is that the proposed EU financing system remains complex. 
Vr samlade slutsats r att det system fr finansiering av EU som fresls fortfarande r komplext.
In addition, we note several issues which are likely to undermine the effectiveness of the proposed new own resources. 
Vi konstaterar dessutom flera problem som sannolikt kommer att underminera ndamlsenligheten i de freslagna, nya egna medlen.
For example, the Commission proposes calculating the resource based on the EU ETS as a percentage of receipts from the auctioning of emissions allowances, the overall volume of which is fixed. 
Till exempel freslr kommissionen att de egna medlen baserade p EU:s utslppshandelssystem ska berknas som en andel av inkomsterna frn utauktioneringen av utslppsrtter, vars totala volym r faststlld.
While this would certainly generate revenue, it would not create an additional incentive for Member States to 
Detta skulle frvisso genera inkomster, men det skulle inte skapa ngot ytterligare incitament fr medlemsstaterna att minska utslppen av vxthusgaser.
The common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) would not be phased in until several years after the start of the new MFF. 
Den gemensamma konsoliderade bolagsskattebasen skulle inte fasas in frrn flera r efter det att den nya flerriga budgetramen har inletts.
And finally, Member States would need to harmonise how they collect and calculate plastic recycling data, which would then have to be verified by the Commission. 
Och slutligen skulle medlemsstaterna behva harmonisera hur de samlar in och berknar uppgifter avseende materialtervinningen av plast, som drefter skulle behva kontrolleras av kommissionen.
We also believe that the Commission should reconsider its proposal to simplify the VAT-based resource, as the assumptions it uses to calculate the new contributions do not match the steps in the reasoning behind the simplification. 
Vi anser ocks att kommissionen br omprva sitt frslag att frenkla de momsbaserade egna medlen, eftersom de antaganden som den anvnder fr att berkna de nya bidragen inte stmmer verens med de olika stegen i resonemanget bakom frenklingen.
To offset the impact of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU and the inclusion of the European Development Fund (EDF) in the EU budget, the Commission proposes increasing the ceilings on own resources. 
Fr att kompensera fr effekten av Frenade kungarikets uttrde ur EU och integreringen av Europeiska utvecklingsfonden i EU-budgeten, freslr kommissionen att taken fr egna medel ska hjas.