natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There is no clear responsibility for assessing the extent to which the financed projects contribute to the achievement of the EU strategy (see paragraphs 19 to 22). 
Det finns ingen tydlig ansvarsfrdelning nr det gller att bedma i vilken utstrckning de finansierade projekten bidrar till att mlen fr EU-strategin uppns (se punkterna 19Đ22).
Since 2000 Member States have been required to base their forestry measures on national or subnational forest programmes. 
Medlemsstaterna har sedan 2000 uppmanats att grunda sina skogsbrukstgrder p nationella och subnationella skogsprogram.
However, these do not always exist and, when they do, they have a widely varying content. 
Sdana finns dock inte alltid, och om de finns r innehllet ofta mycket varierande.
In the absence of forest programmes the Commission accepted rural development plans (RDP) and operational programmes (OP) as equivalent to the national programmes. 
I de fall det saknades skogsprogram godknde kommissionen planer fr landsbygdens utveckling och operativa program som likvrdiga med nationella program.
However their assessment was affected by the CommissionŐs own internal organisation and by the time pressure. 
Deras bedmning pverkades dock av kommissionens egen interna organisation och av tidspressen.
The CommissionŐs information on forestry actions in Member States is still incomplete (see paragraphs 23 to 36). 
Kommissionens information om medlemsstaternas skogsbrukstgrder r fortfarande ofullstndig (se punkterna 23Đ36).
Forestry support is implemented using rural development programming tools but is hampered by the large uptake of funds for forestry CAP accompanying measures which had been entered into previously. Because of the long contract period for forestry there is little freedom to manoeuvre: much of the money available has in practice already been allocated in the form of CAP accompanying measures (see paragraphs 37 to 39). 
Skogsbruksstdet genomfrs med hjlp av samma form av programplaneringsverktyg som anvnds inom landsbygdens utveckling, men hmmas av den stora mngd medel som gr till skogsbruksrelaterade kompletterande GJP-tgrder som man ingtt taganden om tidigare. Skogsbrukets lnga kontraktstider ger fga manverutrymme Đ en stor andel av de tillgngliga medlen har i praktiken redan anslagits till kompletterande tgrder inom GJP (se punkterna 37Đ39).
The system in place for implementing forestry measures is complex. 
Det system som finns fr genomfrandet av skogsbrukstgrder r komplicerat.
This creates difficulties for both managing authorities and beneficiaries (see paragraphs 40 to 42). 
Detta leder till svrigheter fr bde ansvariga myndigheter och stdmottagare (se punkterna 40Đ42).
(1) Council Resolution of 15 December 1998 (OJ C 56, 26.2.1999, p. 
(1) Rdets resolution av den 15 december 1998 (EGT C 56, 26.2.1999, s.
1). The Council Resolution states that the responsibility for forestry policy lies with the Member States and that Community actions are based on the principle of subsidiarity: Ôemphasises the principle of subsidiarity, given the fact that the Treaty establishing the European Community makes no provisions for a specific common forestry policy and that responsibility for forestry policy lies with the Member States, nevertheless taking into account that, pursuant to the principle of subsidiarity and the concept of shared responsibility, the Community can contribute positively to the implementation of sustainable forest management and the multifunctional role of forests.Ő (2) 1993 pan-European Ministerial Conference in Helsinki. 
1). I resolutionen anges att ansvaret fr skogsbrukspolitiken vilar p medlemsstaterna och att gemenskapstgrder baseras p subsidiaritetsprincipen: rdet betonar Ósubsidiaritetsprincipen, med tanke p att Frdraget om upprttandet av Europeiska gemenskapen inte freskriver en srskild gemensam skogsbrukspolitik och att ansvaret fr skogsbrukspolitiken vilar p medlemsstaterna, likvl med beaktande av att gemenskapen i enlighet med subsidiaritetsprincipen och begreppet delat ansvar kan bidra positivt till genomfrandet av ett hllbart skogsbruk och skogens mngsidiga rollÓ.
18.3.2005 18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 67/5 X. The audit found a number of weaknesses in the implementation of forestry measures (see paragraphs 43 to 58 and 62 to 64), such as: Ń varying interpretations were noted in prioritising the land to be afforested, Ń no clear Community guidelines on how to ensure compatibility with the environment, Ń unclear project selection criteria, Ń unsatisfactory arrangements for deciding on eligibility relating to land use, loss of income and whether beneficiaries were farmers, Ń weak on the spot checks to verify the correctness of claims, Ń a need to improve control procedures for public contract tendering. 
18.3.2005 18.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 67/5 X. Vid granskningen upptcktes ett antal brister i genomfrandet av skogsbrukstgrder (se punkterna 43Đ58 och 62Đ64), till exempel fljande: Ń Skiftande tolkningar konstaterades nr det gller hur man prioriterar den mark som skall beskogas.
As some of these local authorities claimed that they might not have sufficient financial resources, there is a risk that projects which have received considerable EU aid will fail in subsequent years (see paragraphs 59 to 61). 
Eftersom en del av dessa lokala myndigheter hvdade att de kanske inte har tillrckliga ekonomiska resurser finns det en risk att projekt som ftt avsevrt EU-std misslyckas under efterfljande r (se punkterna 59Đ61).
Increasing woodland area by grant-aided afforestation of agricultural land is very expensive mainly due to the compensation paid for loss of agricultural income over a period of 20 years. 
Det r mycket kostsamt att ka skogsmarksarealen genom statsunderstdd beskogning av jordbruksmark, framfr allt p grund av den ersttning fr inkomstbortfall frn jordbruket som betalas ut i 20 r.
Moreover, the results have not been very significant and could have been obtained more cheaply (see paragraphs 65 to 78). 
Resultaten har dessutom inte varit srskilt betydande och kunde ha uppntts billigare (se punkterna 65Đ78).
Various aspects of the support scheme should be reviewed. 
Olika aspekter av stdprogrammet br ses ver.
In particular the Commission should reconsider how the afforestation measure can be better targeted, at a lower cost to the EU budget taking into account the changing public needs and the fact that the emphasis of Community legislation is now on sustainable environmental benefits (see paragraphs 79 to 87). 
Framfr allt br kommissionen underska hur tgrderna fr beskogning kan riktas bttre, till en lgre kostnad fr EU-budgeten och med hnsyn till allmnhetens frndrade behov samt till att hllbara miljvinster numera betonas i gemenskapslagstiftningen (se punkterna 79Đ87).
Forests and other wooded areas account for 136 million ha (1), which is about 36 % of the total EU surface area. 
Skog och andra skogsomrden utgr 136 miljoner hektar (1) av EU:s totala landyta, vilket motsvarar runt 36 %.
Forests favour tourism and are considered to be an important component of European nature, being home to a rich variety of mammals, birds and reptiles. 
Skog gynnar turismen och anses vara en viktig del av Europas natur eftersom en stor mngd olika dggdjur, fglar och reptiler bor i den.
Forests are of considerable socio-economic relevance. 
Skogen har stor samhllsekonomisk betydelse.
About 65 % of forests are privately owned by approximately 12 million owners in the EU. However ownership structures vary widely within the EU. 
Omkring 65 % av skogen gs privat av cirka 12 miljoner skogsgare inom EU. garstrukturerna varierar emellertid kraftigt inom unionen.
In Greece and Ireland, the State owns about two thirds of forest land. 
I Grekland och Irland ger staten omkring tv tredjedelar av skogsmarken.
In Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg and Spain, the main forest owners are local communities and in Nordic countries private holdings are predominant. 
I Belgien, Frankrike, Tyskland, Italien, Luxemburg och Spanien gs skogen framfr allt av kommunerna, och i de nordiska lnderna dominerar det privata gandet.
Forest sector is an important employer, particularly in EU rural areas. 
Skogsbrukssektorn r en viktig sysselsttningsfaktor inom EU, srskilt p landsbygden.
According to the Commission (2), the sector is estimated to employ directly 2,6 million people. 
Enligt kommissionen (2) arbetar uppskattningsvis 2,6 miljoner mnniskor i branschen.
EU forestry support and the EU forestry strategy 4. 
EU:s skogsbruksstd och skogsbruksstrategi 4.
The EU has provided support for forestry since 1964. 
EU har gett std till skogsbruk sedan 1964.
For more than 30 years that support consisted of improving forestry structures and, since 1992, afforestation of agricultural land. 
I ver 30 r har stdet besttt i att frbttra skogsbrukets struktur och, frn 1992, i att beskoga jordbruksmark.
A new impetus was given on 15 December 1998, when the Council adopted a Resolution (3) setting out an EU forestry strategy. 
Nya impulser gavs den 15 december 1998 d rdet antog en resolution (3) dr EU:s skogsbruksstrategi faststlls.
(3) Council Resolution of 15 December 1998. 
(3) Rdets resolution av den 15 december 1998.
C 67/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 18.3.2005 5. 
C 67/6 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 18.3.2005 5.
It is based on international undertakings previously given by the Community and the Member States and was to be applied using national or regional forestry plans. (b) forests have a multifunctional (ecological, economic and social) role. 
Strategin utgr frn de internationella taganden som tidigare gjorts av gemenskapen och medlemsstaterna och skall tillmpas med hjlp av nationella eller regionala skogsbruksprogram. b) Skogen har mnga (ekologiska, ekonomiska och sociala) funktioner.
EU financial support to forests 7. 
EU:s ekonomiska std till skogen 7.
Some 1 500 million euro were spent in the period 1992 to 1999 on afforestation of agricultural land. 
Runt 1500 miljoner euro anvndes under ren 1992Đ1999 till beskogning av jordbruksmark.
For the period 2000 to 2006 the EU contribution is planned to be 2 387 million euro for afforestation measures and 2 420 million euro for other forestry measures (3) (see table). 
Under perioden 2000Đ2006 skall EU enligt planerna lmna bidrag p 2 387 miljoner euro till beskogningstgrder och 2 420 miljoner euro till vriga skogsbrukstgrder (3) (se tabell).
6. (a) Two guiding principles govern the Strategy: forest management should be sustainable (2), Table Financial forecast of forestry measures 2000 to 2006: EU contribution under EAGGF Source: Commission (1) Council Resolution of 15 December 1998. The Council Resolution states that the responsibility for forestry policy lies with the Members States and that Community actions are based on the principle of subsidiarity: emphasises the principle of subsidiarity, given the fact that the Treaty establishing the European Community makes no provisions for a specific common forestry policy and that responsibility for forestry policy lies with the Member States, nevertheless taking into account that, pursuant to the principle of subsidiarity and the concept of shared responsibility, the Community can contribute positively to the implementation of sustainable forest management and the multifunctional role of forests. 
Tabell Ekonomisk prognos fr skogsbrukstgrder 2000Đ2006: EU-bidrag genom EUGFJ Klla: Kommissionen. (1) Rdets resolution av den 15 december 1998. I resolutionen anges att ansvaret fr skogsbrukspolitiken vilar p medlemsstaterna och att gemenskapstgrder baseras p subsidiaritetsprincipen: rdet betonar Ósubsidiaritetsprincipen, med tanke p att Frdraget om upprttandet av Europeiska gemenskapen inte freskriver en srskild gemensam skogsbrukspolitik och att ansvaret fr skogsbrukspolitiken vilar p medlemsstaterna, likvl med beaktande av att gemenskapen i enlighet med subsidiaritetsprincipen och begreppet delat ansvar kan bidra positivt till genomfrandet av ett hllbart skogsbruk och skogens mngsidiga rollÓ.
(2) 1993 pan-European Ministerial Conference in Helsinki. 
(2) 1993 rs alleuropeiska ministerkonferens i Helsingfors.
(3) Source: Commission. 
(3) Klla: Kommissionen.
18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 67/7 8. 
18.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 67/7 8.
From the year 2000, forestry expenditure was integrated into the support for rural development by Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 (1). 
Genom frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999 (1) frdes skogs-bruksutgifterna in under stdet till landsbygdens utveckling, med brjan 2000.
Such support is intended to promote, in particular, one or more of the following objectives (Article 29): Ń sustainable forest management and development of forestry, Ń maintenance and improvement of forest resources, Ń extension of woodland areas. 
Detta std syftar srskilt till att frmja ett eller flera av fljande ml (artikel 29): Ń Hllbar skogssktsel och utveckling av skogsbruket. Ń Bevarande och frbttring av skogsresurserna. Ń Utvidgning av skogsarealen.
Two distinct types of actions were set: 12. 
Tv tydliga tgrdstyper faststlldes: 12.
The present audit covered the forestry measures of the rural development Regulation summarised in paragraph 8 above (5). 
Den aktuella granskningen berrde de skogsbrukstgrder som nmns i frordningen om landsbygdens utveckling och som sammanfattas i punkt 8 ovan (5).
The principal objectives of the CourtŐs audit were to determine: Ń whether the forestry measures are based on forestry plans or equivalent instruments, Ń how such measures were programmed and financed, Ń how they were implemented, Ń what was the impact of the measures as regards economy, efficiency and effectiveness. 
Revisionsrttens granskning syftade i frsta hand till att avgra Ń huruvida skogsbrukstgrderna bygger p skogsbruksprogram eller likvrdiga instrument, Ń hur dessa tgrder planlades och finansierades, Ń hur tgrderna genomfrdes, och Ń vilken inverkan tgrderna fick i frga om ekonomi, effektivitet och ndamlsenlighet.
Audit visits were carried out at the Commission (Directorate-General for Agriculture), where information on the implementation of the strategy was examined. Audits were also carried out of the management of forestry measures and projects by the national, regional and local administrations in the main recipient Member States (Spain, Portugal, Italy, Ireland and France). 
Granskningsbesk gjordes hos kommissionen (generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk) dr information om strategins genomfrande undersktes. ven nationella, regionala och lokala myndigheters handlggning av skogsbrukstgrder och projekt i de medlemsstater som ftt mest std (Spanien, Portugal, Italien, Irland och Frankrike) granskades.
Thirty four projects, selected on the basis of their financial importance and representativity of the measures, were visited on the spot. 
Totalt 34 projekt, valda med utgngspunkt frn tgrdernas ekonomiska betydelse och representativitet, studerades p plats.
THE EU STRATEGY AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION Legal framework 14. 
EU-STRATEGIN OCH DESS GENOMF RANDE Rttsliga ramar 14.
The Treaty establishing the European Community makes no provision for a common forestry policy, nor do the articles of the EC Treaty relating to the common agricultural policy set out market provisions for forestry products such as timber. 
I Frdraget om upprttandet av Europeiska gemenskapen finns inga bestmmelser om ngon gemensam skogsbrukspolitik. Inte heller faststlls ngra marknadsbestmmelser fr skogsbruksprodukter, till exempel virke, i EG-frdragets artiklar om den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
Instead, Community forestry actions have been undertaken by applying the EC Treaty provisions of other policies (6). 
I stllet har gemenskapens skogsbrukstgrder vidtagits genom tillmpning av EG-frdragets bestmmelser fr andra politikomrden (6).
Annex I summarises the main forestry actions carried out in the past. 
I bilaga I sammanfattas de viktigaste skogsbrukstgrder som vidtagits tidigare.
(5) The audit scope did not cover other forestry financing by the EU budget like Forestry Research, Forest Natura 2000, Forest Focus. 
(5) Granskningen omfattade inte vrig finansiering i EU-budgeten av skogsbruket, som Forestry Research, Forest Natura 2000 och Forest Focus.
(6) TheCommission(COM(1998)649)indicatestherelevanceofforestry by the following: Ń with their many functions, forests are essential to rural areas and constitute a major component of an integrated rural development policy, particularly because of their contribution to income and employment and their ecological and social value, Ń forests and their diversity are an important part of the European natural environment and their protection and conservation falls within the scope of a number of Community policies and is the subject in particular of specific environmental issues such as the EU Biodiversity Strategy, Natura 2000 and the implementation of the Climate Change Convention, Ń for forest products, and in particular wood (as well as cork and resins), the rules of the Internal Market apply, including the normal EU competition rules on state aids, mergers and cartels. (a) (b) afforestation (2) (Article 31), other forestry measures (2) (Articles 30 and 32). All EU financial support for afforestation of agricultural 9. land is charged to the EAGGF-Guarantee section. 
(6) Kommissionen beskriver skogsbrukets betydelse enligt fljande (KOM(1998) 649): Ń Med sina mnga funktioner utgr skogarna en vsentlig del av landsbygdsomrdena och en hrnsten i den integrerade politiken fr landsbygdens utveckling, srskilt p grund av den roll de spelar fr inkomst och sysselsttning samt deras ekologiska och sociala betydelse. Ń Skogarna och deras mngfald r en viktig del av Europas natur Đ och att skydda och bevara dem ingr i ett antal av gemenskapens politikomrden, i synnerhet i den gemenskapspolitik som rr srskilda miljfrgor som EU:s strategi fr biologisk mngfald, Natura 2000 och genomfrande av konventionen om klimatfrndringar.
Afforestation of ÔotherŐ land is financed by the Guidance section of EAGGF if it takes place in regions which are classified as ÔObjective 1Ő (3) for the purposes of the Structural Funds and by the Guarantee section of the EAGGF if it takes place elsewhere. 
Beskogning av ÓvrigÓ mark finansieras genom EUGFJ-utveckling om det rr sig om strukturfondernas ml 1-omrden (3) och genom EUGFJ-garanti om det handlar om andra omrden.
The figures in the table demonstrate the different approaches to the strategy adopted by the Member States. 
Siffrorna i tabellen visar medlemsstaternas skilda synstt p strategin.
The northern EU countries (Sweden and Finland) have substantial forest cover already and do not have any significant afforestation policy, preferring to concentrate on other rural development priorities. 
EU-lnderna i norr (Sverige och Finland) har redan avsevrda skogsarealer och saknar uttalad politik fr beskogning; de vljer i stllet att inrikta sig p andra prioriteringar inom landsbygdens utveckling.
Expenditure is highest in Spain, Italy and Portugal which face not only serious risk of damage of forests through fires and drought but also promote afforestation measures for economic, social and environmental reasons. 
Utgifterna r hgst i Spanien, Italien och Portugal som inte bara r utsatta fr allvarliga risker nr det gller skador p skogen i form av brnder och torka utan ocks frmjar beskogningstgrder av ekonomiska, sociala och miljmssiga skl.
The audit of the Court 11. 
Revisionsrttens granskning 11.
A previous Court audit of the afforestation of agricultural land (4) concluded that there were insufficient impact analyses and lack of evaluations and monitoring of implementation by the Member States. 
I en tidigare granskning av beskogning av jordbruksmark (4) konstaterade revisionsrtten att konsekvenserna av den inte hade studerats tillrckligt noggrant och att det fanns brister i medlemsstaternas utvrdering och kontroll av genomfrandet.
(1) Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 which sets out the framework regulation for rural development support. 
(1) Frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999, i vilken ramarna fr std till landsbygdens utveckling faststlls.
(2) See glossary. 
(2) Se ordlistan.
(3) Objective 1 of the Structural Funds is aimed at promoting the development and structural adjustments of regions whose development is lagging behind. 
(3) Strukturfondernas ml 1 syftar till att frmja utvecklingen och strukturanpassningen i omrden som slpar efter i utvecklingen.
(4) Special Report No 14/2000 (OJ C 353, 8.12.2000, p. 
(4) Srskild rapport nr 14/2000 (EGT C 353, 8.12.2000, s.
C 67/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 18.3.2005 Sustainability and how to implement it 15. 
C 67/8 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 18.3.2005 Hllbarhet och hur den skall uppns 15.
The concept of sustainability has been developed in international conferences and is mostly linked to political commitments. 
Begreppet hllbarhet har utformats vid internationella konferenser och r framfr allt knutet till politiska taganden.
Conferences in Helsinki and Lisbon, in 1993 and 1998 respectively defined more explicitly the concept of sustainable forest management by drawing up a set of monitoring indicators. 
Vid konferenserna i Helsingfors och Lissabon, 1993 respektive 1998, utarbetades en tydligare definition av begreppet hllbar skogssktsel genom att ett antal kontrollindikatorer togs fram.
However, this concept is vague because it is based on the integration of aims (mainly economic, environmental and social) and intentions (e. g. protection of biodiversity, and productivity), which can be contradictory. 
Begreppet r emellertid vagt, eftersom det bygger p en samordning av ml (huvudsakligen ekonomiska, miljmssiga och sociala ml) och avsikter (till exempel skyddet av den biologiska mngfalden och produktiviteten) som kan vara motstridiga.
It appears to have been particularly difficult to obtain an appropriate balance between the economic, ecological and social aims. 
Det verkar ha varit srskilt svrt att stadkomma en lmplig balans mellan de ekonomiska, miljmssiga och sociala mlen.
Interested parties identify the balance in different ways depending on their own interests and conflicts between these stakeholders exist. 
De berrda parterna gr olika avvgningar utifrn sina egna intressen och det finns motsttninger mellan dessa aktrer.
In one Member State visited the policy was highly criticised by environmental NGOŐs which claimed that it was over-focused on economic aspects without due regard to the need to maintain bio-diversity. 
I en av de medlemsstater som besktes riktade icke-statliga organisationer p miljomrdet skarp kritik mot politiken som sades lgga alltfr stor vikt vid de ekonomiska aspekterna utan vederbrlig hnsyn till behovet av att bevara den biologiska mngfalden.
Other Member States gave limited consideration to the social aspects of forests. 
Andra medlemsstater tog begrnsad hnsyn till skogens sociala perspektiv.
The diagram illustrates the various sustainability components. 
I diagram visas de olika aspekterna av hllbarhet.
Diagram Member States define ÔforestŐ differently 17. 
Diagram Medlemsstaternas varierande definition av ÓskogÓ 17.
Member States do not use a consistent definition of woodland areas. 
Medlemsstaterna har inte ngon fast definition av skogsmark.
A definition, developed internationally does exist (notably by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Đ FAO (1)), but this is not applied in all the Member States in the same way, as is highlighted in a report produced by the European Commission (2). 
Det finns en internationellt utarbetad definition (av FN:s livsmedels-och jordbruksorganisation, FAO (1)), men den tillmpas inte p samma stt i alla medlemsstater, vilket framgr av en rapport av Europeiska kommissionen (2).
Annex II illustrates the differences in the forestry definitions applied by the Member States. 
Medlemsstaternas olika definitioner av skogsbruk framgr av bilaga II.