natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
27 It was acknowledged by the visited MSs that the Commission has done much on a practical level to help implement the Directive, by organising cluster discussions for the mutual evaluation as well as providing guidance during regular thematic expert group meetings. 
27 De medlemsstater som vi beskte uppskattade att kommissionen har gjort mycket rent praktiskt fr att hjlpa till med genomfrandet av direktivet genom att den har organiserat gruppdiskussioner fr den msesidiga utvrderingen och gett vgledning p regelbundna tematiska expertgruppmten.
According to Commission estimates, of all the barriers that the Directive seeks to remove for the selected professional groups studied, 10 % had been fully removed, 60 % partly removed, and 30 % remained18. 
Av alla de hinder som direktivet syftar till att undanrja nr det gller de utvalda yrkesgrupper som studeras har, enligt kommissionens uppskattningar, 10 % avskaffats helt och 60 % avskaffats delvis medan 30 % kvarstr18.
This indicated that there was still a long way to go to complete implementation. 
Det tydde p att det fortfarande var lngt kvar till ett fullstndigt genomfrande.
29 Whilst the mutual evaluations involved cooperation to screen large amounts of national and regional legislation, officials in a number of MSs visited criticised the eventual effectiveness of this exercise. 
29 De msesidiga utvrderingarna innebar att medlemsstaterna mste samarbeta fr att underska stora mngder nationell och regional lagstiftning, men tjnstemn i ett antal beskta medlemsstater var kritiska nr det gllde frfarandets faktiska ndamlsenlighet.
They considered that the Commission had done little to eliminate the potentially unjustified barriers that were identified during the mutual evaluation process. 
De ansg att kommissionen inte hade gjort mycket fr att undanrja de potentiellt omotiverade hinder som hade identifierats under den msesidiga utvrderingen.
In addition, a group of six MSss were of the opinion that the Commission did not sufficiently challenge the ‘proportionality’ justification. 
En grupp p sex medlemsstater ansg dessutom att kommissionen inte tillrckligt ifrgasatte den motivering som baserades p ÓproportionalitetÓ.
They advocated publishing specific guidance with examples of what is and is not proportionate. 
De rekommenderade att specifik vgledning skulle utfrdas med exempel p vad som r proportionellt och vad som inte r det.
This would provide a common understanding of proportionality and allow the Commission to have a yardstick when assessing existing and new requirements. 
Det skulle skapa en samsyn p proportionalitet och ge kommissionen en mttstock nr den ska bedma befintliga och nya krav.
18 J. Monteagudo, A. Rutkowski, D. Lorenzani, ‘The economic impact of the Services Directive: a first assessment following implementation’, Economic Papers No 456, June 2012, European Commission, Brussels, 2012, p. 
18 J. Monteagudo, Al. Rutkowski, D. Lorenzani, The economic impact of the Services Directive: A first assessment following implementation (tjnste-direktivets ekonomiska effekter: en frsta bedmning efter genomfrandet), Economic Papers nr 456, juni 2012, Europeiska kommissionen, Bryssel, 2012, s.
Observations 17 Performance checks were made on how EU legislation works in practical business scenarios 30 In 2011 and 2012 the Commission undertook ‘performance checks’ to assess ‘how different pieces of EU legislation are applied and how they work on the ground’19 from the perspective of different users of the single market. 
Iakttagelser 17 Koherenstester gjordes av hur EU:s lagstiftning fungerar i konkreta affrscenarier 30 r 2011 och 2012 gjorde kommissionen ÓkoherenstesterÓ fr att Óf en bild av hur olika EU-regler tillmpas och hur de fungerar i praktikenÓ19 utifrn det perspektiv som de olika anvndarna av den inre marknaden har.
This involved taking account of EU instruments besides the Directive. 
I detta ingick ven att beakta EU-instrument vid sidan av direktivet.
The Commission decided to carry out the checks based on case studies in selected business sectors and for selected activities. 
Kommissionen beslutade att genomfra testerna utifrn fallstudier i utvalda affrssektorer och fr utvalda verksamheter.
31 MSs were invited to provide information on how their national legislation would be applied in practice to potential service providers, who wanted to either set up a business or provide cross-border services on their territory. 
31 Medlemsstaterna uppmanades att lmna information om hur deras nationella lagstiftning skulle tillmpas i praktiken p potentiella tjnsteleverantrer som antingen ville etablera ett fretag eller tillhandahlla grnsverskridande tjnster p deras territorium.
32 A staff working document20 of the Commission summarised the results of the performance checks for three sectors considered important for cross-border trade in the EU: construction (contributing 6.3 % to GDP); business services (11.7 %); and tourism (4.4 %). 
32 I ett arbetsdokument20 frn kommissionen sammanfattades resultaten av koherenstesterna fr tre sektorer som ansgs viktiga fr den grnsverskridande handeln inom EU: byggnadssektorn (som bidrar med 6,3 % till BNP), affrstjnster (11,7 %) och turism (4,4 %).
The outcomes led to further legislative proposals by the Commission 33 The checks showed that there is a very close link between the Directive and the professional qualifications directive. 
Resultaten ledde till att kommissionen lade fram ytterligare lagstiftningsfrslag 33 Testerna visade att det finns en mycket nra koppling mellan direktivet och direktivet om yrkeskvalifikationer.
Recognition of qualifications is often needed before an individual is allowed to provide services or set up a cross-border business. 
Erknnande av kvalifikationer krvs ofta innan en person tillts tillhandahlla tjnster eller etablera ett grnsverskridande fretag.
The results of the performance checks prompted the Commission to submit amendments to the professional qualifications directive and on cooperation via the internal market information system (IMI)21. 
Resultaten av koherenstesterna franledde kommissionen att lgga fram ndringsfrslag till direktivet om yrkeskvalifikationer och om samarbete via informationssystemet fr den inre marknaden (IMI)21.
19 COM(2011) 20 final, p. 
19 KOM(2011) 20 slutlig, s.
20 SWD(2012) 147 final of 8 June 2012, ‘Commission staff working document on the results of the performance checks of the internal market for services (construction, business services and tourism)’. 
20 SWD(2012) 147 final, 8.6.2012, arbetsdokument frn kommissionens avdelningar om resultaten av koherenstesterna av den inre marknaden fr tjnster (byggnadssektorn, affrstjnster och turism).
21 Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the internal market information system (‘the IMI regulation’) (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 
21 Europaparlamentets och rdets direktiv 2013/55/EU av den 20 november 2013 om ndring av direktiv 2005/36/EG om erknnande av yrkeskvalifikationer och frordning (EU) nr 1024/2012 om administrativt samarbete genom informationssystemet fr den inre marknaden (IMI-frordningen) (EUT L 354, 28.12.2013, s.
Observations 18 34 Performance checks identified barriers in national legislation imposing requirements for special shareholding structures and insurance. 
Iakttagelser 18 34 Vid koherenstesterna identifierades hinder i nationell lagstiftning som innebar att krav stlldes p srskilda strukturer fr kapitalinnehav och frskringar.
Businesses often needed to adapt their legal form or shareholder structure to be able to operate in another MS via secondary establishment, which might lead to supplementary costs. 
Fretag var ofta tvungna att anpassa sin juridiska form eller garstruktur fr att kunna bedriva verksamhet i en annan medlemsstat via sekundr etablering, vilket kan leda till extrakostnader.
Another common difficulty identified was insurance coverage. 
En annan vanlig svrighet som identifierades gllde frskringsskydd.
In a significant number of MSs, the insurance coverage in the MS of establishment is not recognised by the MS in which the company intends to provide the service, again resulting in additional costs to the provider. 
I ett betydande antal medlemsstater erknns inte frskrings-skyddet i etableringsmedlemsstaten av den medlemsstat dr fretaget avser att tillhandahlla en tjnst, vilket terigen resulterar i merkostnader fr tjnsteleve-rantren.
Staff working documents on these two questions were published in October 201322 and March 201423. 
Arbetsdokument frn kommissionens avdelningar om dessa tv frgor offentliggjordes i oktober 201322 och mars 201423.
Commission could have used results better to systematically enforce the Services Directive 35 The performance checks revealed that significant barriers and obstacles still exist in the MSs, some of them common to all three sectors (cross-cutting barriers) and some industry specific. 
Kommissionen kunde ha anvnt resultaten bttre fr att systematiskt se till att tjnstedirektivet fljs 35 Koherenstesterna visade att betydande hinder fortfarande finns i medlemsstaterna och att en del av dem r gemensamma fr alla tre sektorerna (vergripande hinder) medan andra r branschspecifika.
36 Even though this was not the main purpose of the exercise, the conclusions of the performance checks reiterated those of the mutual evaluation, i.e. that a significant number of obstacles remained. 
36 ven om det inte var huvudsyftet med frfarandet bekrftade slutsatserna frn koherenstesterna slutsatserna frn den msesidiga utvrderingen, det vill sga att ett betydande antal hinder kvarstod.
Lack of economic impact assessment 37 The Commission made only a predictive assessment of the economic benefits of the Directive, carried out at the time of its introduction, and did not have sufficiently detailed economic data to cover only those activities concerned by the Directive. 
Ekonomiska konsekvensanalyser saknades 37 Kommissionen gjorde endast en frutsgande bedmning av direktivets ekonomiska frdelar, nr det infrdes, och hade inte tillrckligt detaljerade ekonomiska uppgifter fr att enbart behandla de verksamheter som berrs av direktivet.
22 SWD(2013) 402 final of 2 October 2013, ‘Commission staff working document on the outcome of the peer review on legal form, shareholding and tariff requirements under the Services Directive’. 
22 SWD(2013) 402 final, 2.10.2013, arbetsdokument frn kommissionens avdelningar om resultatet av den inbrdes granskningen av krav rrande juridisk form, kapitalinnehav och prisstruktur enligt tjnstedirektivet.
23 SWD(2014) 130 final of 31 March 2014, ‘Commission staff working document — Access to insurance for services provided in another Member State’. 
23 SWD(2014) 130 final, 31.3.2014, arbetsdokument frn kommissionens avdelningar om tillgng till frskringar nr det gller tjnster som tillhandahlls i en annan medlemsstat.
Observations 19 38 In 2012 the Commission estimated that GDP could be increased by an extra 1.6 %, on top of the 0.8 % claimed to be already achieved, through better implementation of the Directive24. 
Iakttagelser 19 38 r 2012 uppskattade kommissionen att BNP skulle kunna kas med ytterligare 1,6 %, utver de 0,8 % som man hvdade redan hade uppntts, om direktivet genomfrdes bttre24.
This study used an econometric model and data on barriers existing prior to the 2009 deadline for implementation, collected during the mutual evaluation process, in combination with economic data on the sectors concerned to predict the effects of removing the barriers. 
I denna studie anvndes en ekonometrisk modell och uppgifter om hinder som fanns fre 2009 rs tidsfrist fr genomfrande och som hade samlats in under frfarandet fr msesidig utvrdering, i kombination med ekonomiska uppgifter om de berrda sektorerna, fr att frutsga effekterna av att hinder hade undanrjts.
It was not, therefore, an ex post exercise in quantifying the effects of the Directive’s implementation. 
Det var drfr inte en efterhandsanalys fr att kvantifiera effekterna av direktivets genomfrande.
39 The Commission was obliged to make assumptions about the size of economic sectors affected by the Directive since detailed breakdowns are not available from existing national accounts or balance-of-payments sources. 
39 Kommissionen var tvungen att gra antaganden om storleken p ekonomiska sektorer som berrdes av direktivet eftersom detaljerade indelningar inte finns tillgngliga i befintliga kllor som nationella rkenskaper eller betalningsbalanser.
40 The Commission made commitments to the European Council as late as 201425 that it would ‘reinforce its monitoring tools through more in-depth quantitative and qualitative reporting on sectoral and national reforms concerning services’. 
40 Kommissionen lovade Europeiska rdet s sent som 201425 att den skulle frstrka sina vervakningsverktyg genom mer ingende kvantitativ och kvalitativ rapportering om sektorsreformer och nationella reformer nr det gller tjnster.
In particular, it agreed to collect services-related data for 2012, 2013 and 2014 which distinguishes between those relevant for sectors covered by the Directive and those relevant for sectors outside its scope. 
Framfr allt gick den med p att samla in tjnsterelaterade uppgifter fr 2012, 2013 och 2014 som skiljer mellan uppgifter om sektorer som omfattas av direktivet och uppgifter om sektorer som inte omfattas av det.
As the data will not encompass the period before the implementation of the Directive, they will not enable an assessment of its overall effect. 
Med hjlp av uppgifterna gr det inte att bedma direktivets samlade effekt eftersom de inte omfattar perioden fre genomfrandet av det.
41 The Commission presented a paper in May 2014 to the National Accounts Working Group which described the economic analysis undertaken with regard to the Directive and presented the data needs arising from the future analytical commitments it had made. 
41 Kommissionen lade fram ett dokument i maj 2014 fr arbetsgruppen fr nationalrkenskaper dr den redogjorde fr den ekonomiska analysen av direktivet och presenterade de uppgiftsbehov som hade uppsttt till fljd av de taganden om framtida analyser som kommissionen hade gjort.
In particular, it emphasised the need for data which distinguishes between economic activity which is covered by the Directive and that which is not. 
Framfr allt understrk kommissionen behovet av uppgifter som skiljer mellan ekonomisk verksamhet som omfattas av direktivet och ekonomisk verksamhet som inte gr det.
The Commission noted that ‘data availability currently seriously restrains the scope of in-depth analysis and progress reporting’ and sought a solution for the problems of outdated or missing data26, sometimes for a period of up to 10 years. 
Kommissionen noterade att den rdande tillgngen till uppgifter allvarligt begrnsade djup-analysens och lgesrapporteringens omfattning och frskte hitta en lsning p problemen med att uppgifter var inaktuella eller saknades26, ibland fr en period p upp till tio r.
Nevertheless, no commitment was given to provide the data necessary for proper evaluation of the Directive. 
Men de gav inget lfte om att tillhandahlla de uppgifter som var ndvndiga fr en ordentlig utvrdering av direktivet.
24 J. Monteagudo, A. Rutkowski, D. Lorenzani, ‘The economic impact of the Services Directive: a first assessment following implementation’, Economic Papers No 456, June 2012, European Commission, Brussels, 2012. 
24 J. Monteagudo, Al. Rutkowski, D. Lorenzani, The economic impact of the Services Directive: A first assessment following implementation (tjnste-direktivets ekonomiska effekter: en frsta bedmning efter genomfrandet), Economic Papers nr 456, juni 2012, Europeiska kommissionen, Bryssel, 2012.
25 Services: tapping the potential for growth and jobs, Commission contribution to the European Council of 20-21 March 2014. 
25 Services: tapping the potential for growth and jobs, Commission contribution to the European Council of 2021 March 2014 (tjnster: utnyttja potentialen fr tillvxt och jobb, kommissionens bidrag till Europeiska rdets mte den 20Đ21 mars 2014).
26 With regard to the 64-branch NACE rev. 2 breakdown in national accounts. 
26 Nr det gller den statistiska nringsgrensindelningen i Europeiska gemenskapen (Nace rev. 2) i 64 branscher i nationalrkenskaperna.
According to the recently finalised ESA 2010 transmission programme, this breakdown will now be submitted by MSs. 
Enligt det nyligen avslutade ENS 2010-programmet fr rapportering kommer denna indelning nu att inrapporteras av medlemsstaterna.
See Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union (OJ L 174, 26.6.2013, p. 1). 
Se Europaparlamentets och rdets frordning (EU) nr 549/2013 av den 21 maj 2013 om det europeiska national-och regionalrkenskapssystemet i Europeiska unionen (EUT L 174, 26.6.2013, s. 1).
Observations 20 Implementation Tools and support provided by the Commission for the implementation of the Services Directive have been underused and are thus only partially effective 43 A number of tools, information services and cooperation mechanisms have either been provided for in the directive or have been otherwise set up by the Commission to facilitate full implementation of the Directive. 
Iakttagelser 20 Genomfrande De verktyg och det std som kommissionen har tillhandahllit fr genomfrandet av tjnstedirektivet har inte anvnts tillrckligt och drfr har de varit endast delvis ndamlsenliga 43 Ett antal verktyg, informationstjnster och samarbetsmekanismer har antingen faststllts i direktivet eller p annat stt infrts av kommissionen fr att gra det lttare att genomfra direktivet fullt ut.
The PSCs have been the most prominent of those which derive directly from the Directive. 
De gemensamma kontaktpunkterna har varit det mest framtrdande verktyget av dem som direkt fljer av direktivet.
Others, including the IMI and the European consumer centres network (ECC-net) have also been developed with the intention of improving trade in services within the EU. 
Andra, bland annat informationssystemet fr den inre marknaden och ntverket av europeiska konsumentcentrum, har ocks utvecklats fr att frbttra handeln med tjnster inom EU.
However, the level of effectiveness of these instruments for the directive has not been as high as intended. 
Verktygen har dock inte varit s ndamlsenliga som man hade tnkt.
44 The directive obliges MSs to ensure that PSCs enable service providers to complete all the procedures and formalities required for authorisation by the competent authorities electronically at a single point. 
44 Enligt direktivet ska medlemsstaterna se till att de gemensamma kontaktpunkterna gr det mjligt fr tjnsteleverantrer att fullgra alla frfaranden och formaliteter som krvs fr godknnande av de behriga myndigheterna p elektronisk vg vid en enda instans.
They should also provide information to potential suppliers and users. 
De ska ven lmna information till potentiella leverantrer och anvndare av tjnster.
The MSs should make the information and services ‘accessible at a distance and by electronic means’27 and are encouraged to provide it in other official EU languages. 
Medlemsstaterna ska gra informationen och tjnsterna tillgngliga Óp distans och p elektronisk vgÓ27 och uppmuntras att gra dem tillgngliga p andra gemenskapssprk.
45 Setting up PSCs has proven to be a challenging task, and MSs have considerable freedom in choosing an approach, resulting in different ways of PSC being embedded in MSs’ administrative structures. 
45 Inrttandet av gemensamma kontaktpunkter har visat sig vara en krvande uppgift, och medlemsstaterna har stor frihet att vlja tillvgagngsstt, vilket har lett till att de gemensamma kontaktpunkterna har infrlivats i medlemsstaternas administrativa strukturer p olika stt.
Delays in setting up points of single contact and varying quality across Member States 46 By the time the transposition deadline passed (28 December 2009), many MSs still did not have a fully functioning PSC. 
Frseningar i inrttandet av gemensamma kontaktpunkter och varierande kvalitet p dem i medlemsstaterna 46 Nr tidsfristen fr infrlivande lpte ut (28 december 2009) hade mnga medlemsstater nnu inte en fullt fungerande gemensam kontaktpunkt.
In order to assist MSs, the Commission established two expert groups in addition to the general expert group in charge of the implementation of the Services Directive. 
Fr att hjlpa medlemsstaterna tillsatte kommissionen tv expertgrupper utver den allmnna expertgrupp som ansvarade fr genomfrandet av direktivet.
The EUGO expert group deals with the PSCs in general and bears the name of the network of PSCs that is also used to create a common brand across the EU (see Figure 1). 
Expertgruppen Eugo behandlar de gemensamma kontaktpunkterna i allmnhet och har samma namn som ntverket av gemensamma kontaktpunkter som ocks anvnds fr att skapa ett gemensamt varumrke i hela Europa (se figur 1).
The e-procedures expert group focuses on more technical matters involved in enabling service providers to complete administrative procedures online. 
Expertgruppen fr e-frfaranden r inriktad p mer tekniska frgor nr det handlar om att ge tjnsteleverantrer mjlighet att fullgra administrativa frfaranden online.
27 Article 7 of the Directive. 
27 Artikel 7 i direktivet.
Observations 21 The EU‐wide logo intended for identification of PSC websites 28 —Services directive implementation survey — The Chambers’ perspective on the points of single contact, Eurochambres, Policy survey, 7th edition, January 2011. —Are the points of single contact truly making things easier for European companies? — Services Directive implementation report, BusinessEurope, November 2011. —The functioning and usability of the points of single contact under the Services Directive — State of play and way forward, Final report, Deloitte and tech4i2 for European Commission, Directorate General for Internal Market and Services, DG MARKT/2010/22/E (SMART 2007/035, LOT 4), 21-01-2012. —J. Montesgudo, A. Rutkowski, D Lorenzani, ‘Part 2: Assessing the economic impact of setting up points of single contact: an approximation based on the doing business’, in ‘The economic impact of the Services Directive: a first assessment following implementation’, Economic Papers No 456, June 2012. 
Iakttagelser 21 EU-logotypen fr identifiering av de gemensamma kontaktpunkternas webbplatser 28 - Underskning om genomfrandet av tjnstedirektivet Đ Kamrarnas perspektiv p de gemensamma kontaktpunkterna, Eurochambres, politisk underskning, 7:e upplagan, januari 2011 - Are the points of Single Contact truly making things easier for European companies? (gr de gemensamma kontaktpunkterna det verkligen enklare fr europeiska fretag att bedriva verkamhet?)
12 47 PSCs are included in the Commission’s single market scoreboard and have been the subject of a number of studies by the Commission and several external or-ganisations28. 
12 47 De gemensamma kontaktpunkterna ingr i kommissionens resultattavla fr den inre marknaden och har varit freml fr ett antal studier av kommissionen och flera externa organisationer28.
These analyses have shown that the level of ambition varies widely in terms of what MSs’ administrations have tried to achieve, and consequently the quality of PSCs is varied. 
Analyserna har visat att ambitionsnivn varierar kraftigt nr det gller vad medlemsstaternas frvaltningar har frskt stadkomma, vilket innebr att ven de gemensamma kontaktpunkternas kvalitet varierar.