natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In 2017 the Commission set up the Security Union Task Force and its subgroup on radicalisation in order to improve coordination of EU actions addressing radicalisation and to identify synergies between different funds and actions. 
Under 2017 inrttade kommissionen arbetsgruppen fr skerhetsunionen och dess undergrupp om radikalisering, i syfte att frbttra samordningen av EU-tgrder fr att bekmpa radikalisering och identifiera synergieffekter mellan olika medel och tgrder.
The suggested opportunity for greater synergy between removal of content and counter narrative campaigns has never been submitted to the Commission or the EU Internet Forum, which pursues both objectives and would therefore have been the appropriate forum. 
Frslagen om mjligheter till kade synergieffekter mellan avlgsnandet av terroristmaterial och motbudskapskampanjer har aldrig framfrts till kommissionen eller EU:s internetforum, som arbetar fr bda dessa ml och drfr skulle vara det lmpliga forumet.
Therefore the Commission does not consider that there has been a lack of coordination on the part of the Commission. 
Kommissionen anser drfr inte att samordningen har brustit frn dess sida.
In particular through the encounters under the EU Internet Forum or in the context of the ECTC (European Counter Terrorism Centre) Advisory Group of Europol established in October 2016 and in which VoxPol and ESCN participate, the Commission and Europol, respectively have facilitated closer engagement and coordination between EU funded actions. 
Kommissionen och Europol har i synnerhet underlttat nrmare kontakter och samordning mellan EU-finansierade tgrder via mtena inom EU:s internetforum och den rdgivande grupp som Europol inrttade i oktober 2016 inom det europeiska centrumet mot terrorism, dr ven VoxPol och ESCN deltar.
28. (a) RAN has already produced a large number of practical outputs in the form of inter alia handbooks and trainings (e.g. training programmes for Europe's police officers, Manifesto for education, Manual on Foreign Terrorist Fighters returnees to name but a few). 
28. a) RAN genererar redan mycket praktisk output, bland annat i form av handbcker och utbildningar (t.ex. utbildningsprogram fr Europas poliser, manifestet fr utbildning, handboken om tervndande utlndska terroriststridande, fr att bara nmna ngra).
The RAN Collection's primary purpose is to inspire other practitioners and the RAN Collection would not seem to be the place where practitioners would search for funding opportunities. 
Det frmsta syftet med RAN:s sammanstllning r att inspirera andra yrkesverksamma, och det r inte srskilt troligt att dessa gr till sammanstllningen fr att ska efter information om finansieringsmjligheter.
The information about project funding is available in other contexts. (b) The Commission is aware of the reasons that explain the difference in participation of stakeholders from individual Member States. 
Information om projektfinansiering finns tillgnglig i andra sammanhang. b) Kommissionen r medveten om sklen till skillnaderna i deltagande fr intressenter frn de olika medlemsstaterna.
In addition to the reasons mentioned by the ECA, it should be kept in mind that it is normal that practitioners from countries that faced higher terrorist threats or with more advanced prevent approaches and practices as well as expertise in place are more represented than others. 
Frutom de skl som revisionsrtten nmner br det noteras att det r normalt att yrkesverksamma frn lnder som str infr strre terroristhot eller har mer avancerade strategier och tgrder fr frebyggande och mer sakkunskap r mer representerade n andra.
The Commission continues to consider important to discuss with Member States their priorities, needs and challenges. 
Kommissionen anser att det r viktigt att fortstta diskussionen med medlemsstaterna om deras prioriteringar, behov och utmaningar.
Since 2017 this is done in particular through the HLCEG-R. Its interim report issued in November 2017 already provided useful steer for activities to be organised by the RAN and ESCN in the course of 2018. 
Sedan 2017 sker detta srskilt via HLCEG-R, som i sin interimsrapport frn november 2017 redan har lmnat anvndbara riktlinjer fr de verksamheter som RAN och ESCN ska organisera under 2018.
The RAN keeps, monitors and updates the list of participants which provides an overview of practitioners per Member State. 
RAN har en deltagarlista som vervakas och uppdateras, och ger en versikt av antalet yrkesverksamma per medlemsstat.
Based on the list the RAN and the Commission can see how the participation by practitioners from a particular Member States evolves. (d) The RAN includes already a large number of organisations on the ground with no links to governments in addition to a large number of other relevant first line practitioners. 
Baserat p deltagarlistan kan RAN och kommissionen se hur deltagandet fr yrkesverksamma frn en viss medlemsstat utvecklas. d) RAN omfattar redan ett stort antal organisationer p fltet utan kopplingar till regeringarna, frutom mnga andra relevanta yrkesverksamma som arbetar i frmsta ledet.
1 Call 2017-ISFP-AG-RAD 2 
Kommissionen anser 1 Frslagsinfordran 2017-ISFP-AG-RAD. 2
(e) Exchanges between practitioners and policy makers take place in different ways: There were a number of events where findings and recommendations from practitioners were shared with policy makers (e.g. the RAN High Level Conference in November 2016 or the RAN Conference on returnees in June 2017). 
att dessa yrkesverksammas insikter och erfarenheter inbegrips i den politiska diskussionen, vilket srjer fr en bottom-up-strategi. e) Utbytena mellan yrkesverksamma och politiskt ansvariga har olika former: De yrkesverksamma har vid flera tillfllen haft mjlighet att dela med sig av sina slutsatser och rekommendationer till de politiskt ansvariga (t.ex. vid RAN:s hgnivkonferens i november 2016 och RAN:s konferens om tervndande i juni 2017).
The Commission considers that the RAN Conference on returnees, together with the handbook and the follow up workshops on the same matter with Member States representatives are having a significant impact on the development of policies in this area at EU but more importantly at the level of Member States. 
Kommissionen anser att RAN:s konferens om tervndande, tillsammans med handboken och de uppfljande workshopparna om samma frgor med medlemsstaternas fretrdare, har en stark inverkan p utformningen av politiska tgrder p omrdet inom EU, men ven p medlemsstatsniv, vilket r nnu viktigare.
The Commission is also engaged with Member States to determine where Member States see scope for further support through the RAN or otherwise. 
Kommissionen arbetar ocks med medlemsstaterna fr att underska om medlemsstaterna ser att det finns mer utrymme fr ytterligare std via RAN eller andra kanaler.
The HLCEG-R set up in July 2017 is an advisory group which helps the Commission identify such needs and formulate appropriate responses. 
HLCEG-R, som inrttades i juli 2017, r en rdgivande grupp som hjlper kommissionen att identifiera sdana behov och ta fram lmpliga tgrder.
The recommendations of the interim report of the HLCEG-R of November 2017, when relevant to RAN, are reflected in its Annual Activity Plan for 2018. 
De rekommendationer i HLCEG-R:s interimsrapport frn november 2017 som r relevanta fr RAN tas med i RAN:s rliga verksamhetsplan fr 2018.
In this way the Commission ensures that the RAN's added value is maximised in practice offering services that address priorities and challenges identified by Member States. 
P s stt frskrar sig kommissionen om att RAN:s mervrde maximeras i praktiken, genom att erbjuda tjnster fr att hantera de prioriteringar och utmaningar som har faststllts av medlemsstaterna.
The issue of radicalisation in prisons became a political priority in line with increased awareness among the relevant stakeholders in the prison and probation field. 
Frgan om radikalisering i fngelser blev en politisk prioritering i och med den kade medvetenheten om denna frga bland berrda intressenter p fngelse-och skyddstillsynsomrdet.
Organisations such as the Council of Europe, EuroPris and CEP (Confederation of European Probation) started becoming actively involved with this issue only in the course of 2015 when the Commission identified actions to be financed by the Justice Programme. 
Organisationer som Europardet, den europeiska organisationen fr fngelser och kriminalvrdsinrttningar (EuroPris) och den europeiska sammanslutningen fr skyddstillsyn brjade engagera sig aktivt i denna frga frst 2015, nr kommissionen faststllde tgrder som skulle finansieras av programmet Rttsliga frgor.
The Commission considers that it is indeed important to possess sufficient information about progress and effectiveness of its actions overall support. 
Kommissionen anser att det naturligtvis r viktigt att frfoga ver tillrcklig information om framstegen med och ndamlsenligheten hos de tgrder som den stder.
The Commission carries out systematic mid-term and ex-post evaluations for EU funds. 
Kommissionen genomfr systematiska halvtids-och efterhandsutvrderingar av EU-medel.
Ex-post, the outcomes of evaluations feed the policy development. 
I efterhand beaktas utvrderingsresultaten i utvecklingen av politiken.
However, given that the threat picture and Member StatesŐ needs can change quickly swift policy responses are required without in depth evaluations of previous actions necessarily being available at that moment. 
Med tanke p att hotbilden och medlemsstaternas behov kan frndras snabbt krvs dock snabba politiska tgrder, trots att djupgende utvrderingar av tidigare tgrder kanske inte finns tillgngliga vid det tillfllet.
Furthermore, its overall support was reviewed in the comprehensive assessment of security policies published in July 2017 with which the Commission responded to the request by the European Parliament. 
Kommissionens allmnna std utvrderades dessutom i den omfattande bedmning av skerhetspolitiken som offentliggjordes i juli 2017, och som utgjorde kommissionens svar p Europaparlamentets begran.
30. (a) The objectives of the Commission's policy on preventing and countering radicalisation are set out in the relevant policy documents. 
30. a) Mlen fr kommissionens politik fr frebyggande och bekmpande av radikalisering anges i de relevanta policydokumenten.
These are necessarily of a more general nature with more concrete objectives being set out under the relevant initiatives. (b) Even if EU funds used do not have specific indicators and targets relating to radicalisation, the effectiveness and value for money of projects addressing radicalisation are evaluated through programme and specific indicators that reflect the scope and goals of the different funding programmes/funds. 
Dessa dokument r ndvndigtvis av en mer allmn karaktr, och de mer konkreta mlen anges i de relevanta initiativen. b) ven om det inte finns ngra srskilda indikatorer och ml i frga om radikalisering fr de EU-medel som anvnds, genomfrs utvrderingar av huruvida projekt mot radikalisering r ndamlsenliga och kostnadseffektiva genom programspecifika indikatorer som avspeglar omfattningen och mlen fr de olika finansieringsprogrammen/medlen.
Such evaluation is carried out systematically under each fund. For instance programmes such as Erasmus+ supporting quality inclusive education and the promotion of common values, are measured for their effectiveness through programme and sector-specific objectives and indicators. 
Sdana utvrderingar genomfrs systematiskt inom varje fond. ndamlsenligheten hos program som Erasmus+, som stder inkluderande utbildning av god kvalitet och frmjar gemensamma vrden, mts till exempel genom program-och sektorsspecifika ml och indikatorer.
Costing estimates are usually related to such broader, education-related objectives rather than to radicalisation as such given their indirect contribution to preventing radicalisation. (c) A comprehensive overview of all counter-radicalisation actions, with the exception of EU actions managed by the Member States, was provided in the framework of the July 2017 comprehensive assessment of EU security policy providing information about funds and costs (see reply to paragraph 26). (d) It would be extremely challenging to fully set out the costs of addressing radicalisation, in particular for actions pursuing multiple purposes and for actions having different timelines. The 3 
Kostnadsuppskattningarna rr vanligen sdana bredare utbildningsrelaterade ml, och inte radikalisering i sig, med tanke p att dessa ml indirekt hjlper till att frebygga radikalisering. c) En omfattande versikt av alla tgrder mot radikalisering, med undantag fr EU-tgrder som frvaltas av medlemsstaterna, lmnades inom ramen fr den vergripande bedmningen av EU:s 3 skerhetspolitik frn juli 2017, som ger information om medel och kostnader (se svaret p punkt 26). d) Det skulle vara ytterst svrt att ange de exakta kostnaderna fr att bekmpa radikalisering, srskilt fr tgrder som har flera ndaml och tgrder med olika tidsgrnser.
Commission points out that policy documents such as the different Communications on radicalisation shall not include specific and exhaustive references to the financial means made available for certain actions. 
Kommissionen ppekar att policydokument, ssom de olika meddelandena om radikalisering, inte ska innehlla uttryckliga och detaljerade hnvisningar till de ekonomiska medel som grs tillgngliga fr vissa tgrder.
Commission Communications are not the documents in which specific financial engagements are recorded or announced. 
Kommissionens meddelanden r inte de rtta dokumenten fr att redovisa eller informera om specifika ekonomiska arrangemang.
Measuring the effectiveness of preventive actions is intrinsically difficult and requires close cooperation between the Commission, Member States, individual stakeholders and researchers. 
Att mta frebyggande tgrders ndamlsenlighet r svrt i sig, och krver nra samarbete mellan kommissionen, medlemsstaterna, olika intressenter och forskare.
It is a gradual process with evaluation techniques being progressively explored and applied. 
Det r en gradvis process, dr utvrderingstekniker undersks och brjar tillmpas efter hand.
As pointed out in the CommissionŐs comprehensive assessment of security policies, there is a need to better evaluate results and effectiveness and for the Commission to continue to explore ways to better demonstrate effectiveness of its actions. 
Ssom kommissionen ppekar i sin vergripande bedmning av skerhetspolitiken finns det ett behov av att frbttra utvrderingen av resultaten och ndamlsenligheten, s att kommissionen p ett bttre stt kan visa hur ndamlsenliga dess tgrder r.
The Commission considers that the appraisal of the performance of the RAN CoE goes beyond a mere listing of events and activities but contains an evaluation of each task, as the RAN Annual progress report for 2016 (APR 2016) clearly demonstrates. 
Kommissionen anser att uppskattningen av resultaten fr RAN-ntverkets kompetenscentrum omfattar mer n bara en lista ver evenemang och verksamheter, och ocks innehller en utvrdering av varje uppgift, vilket tydligt framgr av den rliga lgesrapporten fr RAN 2016 (april 2016).
The selection process under EU funding instruments includes an assessment of the robustness of the evaluation and monitoring strategy proposed by the applicants and is part of the analysis of the strength and weaknesses of the different projects. 
Urvalsprocessen fr EU:s finansieringsinstrument omfattar en bedmning av om den utvrderings-och vervakningsstrategi som fresls av skanden r robust, och detta ingr i analysen av projektens starka och svaga sidor.
However, the quality of the evaluation and monitoring strategy embedded in a project is not the only element to decide for its selection. 
Kvaliteten p projektets utvrderings-och vervakningsstrategi r dock inte den enda faktor som spelar in i urvalsbeslutet.
Indeed, projects are firstly selected based on their relevance to the policy objective set in the calls for proposals and their EU added value (e.g. whether they involve or impact on several Member States). 
Projekten vljs frst ut p grundval av deras relevans fr det politiska ml som anges i frslagsinfordringarna och deras EU-mervrde (t.ex. om de omfattar eller pverkar flera medlemsstater).
In addition, the absence of effectiveness indicators does not imply that the effectiveness cannot be assessed, since projects are required to provide a detailed narrative report which allows the Commission to assess whether the project made an effective contribution to the achievement of the policy goal. 
Avsaknaden av indikatorer fr att utvrdera ndamlsenligheten innebr inte heller att ndamlsenligheten inte kan bedmas, eftersom projekten ska lmna detaljerade beskrivningar fr att kommissionen ska kunna bedma om projektet faktiskt har bidragit till att uppn det politiska mlet.
As part of this final assessment, the Commission evaluates a number of elements, including quality, usefulness and transferability of the results. 
I sin slutliga bedmning utvrderar kommissionen ett antal faktorer, bland annat resultatens kvalitet, anvndbarhet och verfrbarhet.
Evaluations of individual projects feed then in the general evaluation of the financial programme, which is carried out with the help of external evaluators. 
Utvrderingar av de olika projekten ingr sedan i den allmnna utvrderingen av finansieringsprogrammet, som grs med hjlp av externa granskare.
For example, the ISEC programme overall, the individual calls and the project results are generally very positively perceived by Member States and stakeholders as stated in the ex-post evaluation of "Prevention and fight against crime" 2007-2013 Programme ISEC. 
ISEC-programmet generellt och de olika frslagsinfordringarna och projektresultaten uppfattas till exempel i allmnhet som mycket positiva av medlemsstaterna och intressenterna, vilket anges i efterhandsutvrderingen av ISEC-programmet ÓFrebyggande och bekmpande av brottÓ 2007Đ 2013.
Finally, the evaluations are complemented by other tools through which the Commission strengthens the evidence base for individual interventions. 
Utvrderingarna kompletteras dessutom av andra verktyg som kommissionen anvnder fr att strka evidensbasen fr individuella insatser.
For instance through the tools developed by the EU funded project IMPACT, project managers are helped to carry out better evaluations of the effectiveness of their actions. 
Med hjlp av de verktyg som tagits fram inom det EU-finansierade projektet Impact kan projektledarna till exempel bttre utvrdera ndamlsenligheten hos sina tgrder.
Furthermore, for instance for specific EU funded projects (such as those to be funded under the Civil Society Empowerment Programme) the Commission foresees an ex-post evaluation of the programme given the innovative nature of alternative and counter narratives. 
Nr det gller specifika EU-finansierade projekt (ssom de projekt som finansieras inom programmet fr att strka civilsamhllets stllning) kommer kommissionen dessutom att gra en efterhandsutvrdering med tanke p den innovativa karaktren hos alternativa budskap och motbudskap.
And as part of the follow up on the interim report of the HLCEG-R, the Commission will explore together with Member States how to better evaluate relevant programmes and interventions. 
Som ett led i uppfljningen av interimsrapporten frn HLCEG-R 4 kommer kommissionen tillsammans med medlemsstaterna att underska hur relevanta program och insatser kan utvrderas bttre.
The Commission has, along with Europol, been requesting data on the removal of terrorist content from the internet companies with only limited feedback. 
Kommissionen har tillsammans med Europol begrt uppgifter frn internetfretagen om terroristinnehll som tas bort, men har endast ftt begrnsad feedback.
Furthermore, the Internet Referral Management Application which Europol has developed will help ensure co-ordination with Member States, thereby reducing the likelihood of duplication. 
Den applikation fr hantering av anmlan av innehll p internet som Europol har utvecklat kommer dessutom att bidra till att srja fr samordning mellan medlemsstaterna, vilket minskar risken fr verlappning.
whack-a-mole effect, the Commission hopes that the Database of Hashes, developed by the companies themselves, will help prevent the re-uploading of terrorist content and its dissemination. 
Nr det gller att hantera whack-a-mole-effekten hoppas kommissionen att Ódatabasen ver hasherÓ, som fretagen sjlva har utvecklat, kommer att bidra till att frhindra att terroristinnehll laddas upp p nytt och sprids.
In that respect, under the Forum, Europol has offered its support in ensuring the optimisation of this tool. 
I detta avseende har Europol inom forumet erbjudit sitt std fr att se till att detta verktyg optimeras.
The EU IRU (Internet Referral Unit) has a so-called de-confliction procedure in place to ensure that Member States have a say in what content is referred by the EU IRU to companies, thus avoiding any negative effects of referrals and subsequent removals which could jeopardise investigations. 
EU IRU (EU-enheten fr anmlan av innehll p internet) har infrt ett s kallat frfarande fr att undvika konflikter fr att se till att medlemsstaterna r med och bestmmer om vilket innehll som EU IRU ska anmla till fretagen, s att man kan undvika eventuella negativa effekter av anmlningar och borttagande som kan ventyra utredningar.
Furthermore, the EU IRU is focusing on online propaganda which the terrorists want to use to attract as many followers as possible. 
EU IRU inriktar sig dessutom p ntpropaganda som terroristerna anvnder fr att locka till sig s mnga anhngare som mjligt.
The one-to-one clandestine communication tends to happen later in the process. 
Den personliga hemliga kommunikationen brukar uppst senare i processen.
If these prevention methods are to be fully effective, it could actually decrease the burden on operational partners in the longer term, as there would be fewer investigations. 
Om dessa frebyggande metoder r helt verkningsfulla kan brdan fr de operativa partnerna minskas p lngre sikt, eftersom antalet utredningar minskas.
The above actions are in line with the EU Internet Forum Action Plan agreed in July 2017; the actions also include reporting arrangements based on a number of indicators. 
De ovanstende tgrderna r i linje med handlingsplanen fr EU:s internetforum, som verenskommelse fattades om i juli 2017, och tgrderna omfattar ven rapporteringsrutiner baserat p ett antal indikatorer.
The Commission's recommendation on illegal content online builds on the progress under the EU Internet Forum and establishes reporting arrangements. 
Kommissionens rekommendation om olagligt innehll bygger p framstegen inom EU:s internetforum och infr rapporteringsrutiner.
The Commission has tasked the RAN Center of Excellence (RAN CoE) to report on the effectiveness of its actions. 
Kommissionen har gett RAN-ntverkets kompetenscentrum i uppgift att rapportera om sina tgrders ndamlsenlighet.
Under the framework contract, the RAN CoE is asked to report in its Quarterly Progress Reports and in particular the Annual Progress Reports (APR) on how its actions contribute to achieving policy objectives pursued. 
Enligt ramavtalet ska RAN-ntverkets kompetenscentrum i sina kvartalsvisa lgesrapporter och srskilt i de rliga lgesrapporterna rapportera om hur dess tgrder bidrar till att uppn de faststllda politiska mlen.
In addition, the RAN carries out surveys (even if not in a systematic manner) in particular in relation to some (key) events. 
RAN genomfr dessutom enkter (ven om det inte grs systematiskt), srskilt av vissa (viktiga) hndelser.