natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1 Setting targets and benchmarks for OP I type of operations is not considered meaningful and proportionate as Member States should have flexibility to address over time different target groups or complement national policies with different instruments. (ii) The Commission partially accepts this recommendation as Article 17(4) of the proposed ESF + regulation specifies that the delivery of food and/or basic material assistance may be complemented with accompanying measures aiming at the social inclusion of the most deprived persons. 
Att faststlla ml och riktmrken fr operativa program av typ I bedms inte vara meningsfullt eller proportionellt, eftersom medlemsstaterna br ha den flexibilitet som krvs fr att rikta in sig p olika mlgrupper eller komplettera nationell politik genom olika instrument ver en lngre tid. ii) Kommissionen godtar delvis denna rekommendation, eftersom det anges i artikel 17.4 i den freslagna frordningen om Europeiska socialfonden+ att utdelningen av livsmedel och/eller grundlggande materiellt bistnd fr backas upp av kompletterande tgrder som syftar till social delaktighet fr dem som har det smst stllt.
Although these accompanying measures are not an obligation for the Member States, the Commission encourages them to fully tap the synergies provided in the ESF+ Regulation proposal to combine different strands of social inclusion support to the most deprived. (iii) The Commision accepts this recommendation. 
De kompletterande tgrderna r inte obligatoriska fr medlemsstaterna, men kommissionen uppmanar medlemsstaterna att fullt utnyttja de synergier som blir mjliga enligt frslaget till frordning om Europeiska socialfonden+ fr att kombinera olika former av std till social delaktighet fr dem som har det smst stllt. iii) Kommissionen godtar denna rekommendation.
The Commission notes that for FEAD, proportionate monitoring and evaluation systems have been put in place in line with the requirement to respect the dignity of the most deprived and will be brought forward in ESF+. 
Kommissionen noterar att proportionella vervaknings-och utvrderingssystem har infrts fr Fead, i linje med kravet att respektera vrdigheten hos dem som har det smst stllt. Dessa system kommer ocks att infras inom ramen fr Europeiska socialfonden+.
The FEAD budgeting inherently included checking against other Structural Funds allocation, and reflects therefore complementarity of funds. 
Fead-budgeteringen innefattade kontroll mot andra strukturfondsanslag och terspeglar drmed fondernas komplementaritet.
It is difficult to establish cross-country comparable data at EU level, as there are a variety of approaches and actors in each Member State on such social policies, not necessarily forming a distinct sector of ecomomic activity. 
Det r svrt att sl fast p EU-niv vad som ska anses vara helt jmfrbara data medlemslnderna emellan, med tanke p att det finns mnga tillvgagngsstt och aktrer i varje medlemsland inom denna del av socialpolitiken, vilken inte heller ndvndigtvis utgr en srskild sektor av ekonomisk verksamhet.
This is also in line with subsidiarity. 
Denna slutsats r ocks i linje med subsidiaritetsprincipen.
The Commission notes that the identification of the most deprived has been based on a needs assessment established according to objective criteria set by national authorities, and in consultation with stakeholders. 
Kommissionen noterar att identifieringen av dem som har det smst stllt baseras p en bedmning av behov som faststllts p grundval av objektiva kriterier som angetts av behriga nationella myndigheter i samrd med relevanta aktrer.
The Commission considers that in the Member States referred to by the ECA the assistance is well targeted taking local needs into account. 
Kommissionen anser att bistndet i de medlemsstater som Europeiska revisionsrtten hnvisar till r vlriktat, med hnsyn till lokala behov.
This approach is effective and adequate in complementing national social policies. 
Detta tillvgagngsstt r effektivt och tillrckligt nr det gller att komplettera nationell socialpolitik.
The Commission considers that the Member States approaches, including those referred to by the ECA, are effective and adequate for adjusting the FEAD support to changing social realities on the ground. 
Kommissionen anser att medlemsstaternas tillvgagngsstt, inklusive dem som Europeiska revisionsrtten hnvisar till, r effektiva och tillrckliga nr det gller att anpassa Fead-std efter skiftande sociala frhllanden i praktiken.
See also above general reply (paragraph 35). 
Se ven det generella svar som anges ovan (punkt 35).
Member States monitor accompanying measures in a qualitative way, and report on them in the Annual Implementation Reports, , including in the Member States referred to by the ECA. 
Medlemsstaterna vervakar de kompletterande tgrderna p ett kvalitativt stt, och rapporterar dessa i de rliga genomfranderapporterna, inklusive i medlemsstaterna som Europeiska revisionsrtten hnvisat till.
Establishing common indicators for accompanying measures would also be contrary to the principle of proportionality that should be applied in FEAD given that accompanying measures are limited to 5% of the support. 
Att sl fast gemensamma indikatorer fr kompletterande tgrder skulle ocks strida mot proportionalitetsprincipen, som br tillmpas i Fead med tanke p att de kompletterande tgrderna r begrnsade till 5 % av stdet.
Further improvement of synergy is ensured by covering FEAD and ESF by one Regulation for the next period through various specific objectives. 
Under nsta period kommer synergin att frbttras ytterligare, eftersom Fead och ESF nu ska omfattas av en och samma frordning, med hjlp av olika srskilda ml.
The Member States considered complementarity at design stage and during implementation when submitting Operational Programmes,. 
Medlemsstaterna tog hnsyn till komplementaritetsaspekten bde p projekteringsstadiet och under genomfrandet nr de operativa programmen lades fram.
The complementarity of FEAD with both national programmes and EU has been positively assessed by the mid-term evaluation. 
Feads komplementaritet i frhllande till bde nationella program och annan EU-finansiering gavs ett positivt betyg vid halvtidsutvrderingen.
In most of the Member States, FEAD is focused on the most deprived and the ESF on people whose basic needs are met and are closer to the labour market. 2 
I de flesta medlemsstater riktas Fead-medlen till dem som har det smst stllt, medan ESF-medlen inriktas p personer vars grundlggande behov har tillgodosetts, och som r i nrmare kontakt med arbetsmarknaden.
Few FEAD end recipients can be considered ready to join ESF measures leading to labour market integration; this is also shown in the annual FEAD Annual Implementation Reports and in the mid-term evaluation. 
F Fead-slutmottagare kan anses vara redo att ansluta sig till ESF-tgrder som leder till integration p arbetsmarknaden. Detta framgr av svl de rliga genomfranderapporterna fr Fead som av halvtidsutvrderingen.
A significant proportion of target groups are children (29%) or persons aged 65 and over (9%) with no link to labour market integration. 
En betydande andel av mlgrupperna r barn (29 %) eller personer i ldrarna 65 eller ver (9 %) som inte har ngra mjligheter att integreras p arbetsmarknaden.
Further, among the homeless, and people with disabilities, no immediate pathway into labour market measures can be expected. 
Nr det gller personer som r hemlsa och personer med funktionsnedsttning kan ingen omedelbar vg in p arbetsmarknaden frvntas.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 55. 
Se ven kommissionens svar p punkt 55.
The Commission has indeed strengthened the reporting of accompanying measures. Whilst being of a qualitative nature, the reporting feeds into a Summary report each year, being sent to the Council and European Parliament. 
Kommissionen har faktiskt frstrkt rapporteringen av kompletterande tgrder. ven om denna rapportering r av kvalitativ karaktr utgr den en del av den rliga sammanfattande rapport som skickas till rdet och Europaparlamentet.
See also Commission replies to paragraphs 50 and 51. 
Se ven kommissionens svar p punkterna 50 och 51.
As the type and coverage of accompanying measures are so diverse, there is no scope for defining common indicators. 
Eftersom typen och omfattningen av de kompletterande tgrderna r s varierande finns det inget utrymme fr att faststlla gemensamma indikatorer.
See also Commission reply to paragraph 42. 
Se ven kommissionens svar p punkt 42.
The impact of FEAD will be assessed through the ex-post evaluation, once the programmes have been completed. 
Feads effekt kommer att bedmas genom efterhandsutvrdering nr programmen har slutfrts.
The reporting of the accompanying measures in the Annual Implementation Reports has indeed been reinforced. 
Rapporteringen av de kompletterande tgrderna i de rliga genomfranderapporterna har redan frstrkts.
There is now a dedicated section for reporting on accompanying measures by the Member States. 
Nu finns det en srskild del fr medlemsstaternas rapportering av kompletterande tgrder.
Thus, the Commission has an overview of type of activities, reach and funding. 
P s stt har kommissionen en versikt av typen av verksamhet, omfattning och finansiering.
The accompanying measures activities remain quite diverse in the type of the actions and also intensity (see also Commission reply to paragraph 42). 
I praktisk mening r de kompletterande tgrderna fortfarande relativt varierande i frga om typ och intensitet (se ven kommissionens svar p punkt 42).
The survey of end recipients carried out twice over the programming period by the Managing Authorities (evaluation) gives important information on the type of accompanying measures in the various Member States and on the usefulness of advice and guidance by Managing Authorities. 
Underskningen av slutmottagarna som de frvaltande myndigheterna utfr tv gnger under programperioden (utvrderingen) innehller viktig information om typen av kompletterande tgrder i olika medlemsstater.
The Commission notes that this monitoring approach is in line with the FEAD Regulation, that envisages programme specific indicators for OP II type of programmes (but not for the OP I type programmes). 
Kommissionen noterar att denna vervakningsmetod verensstmmer med Fead-frordningen, som avser programspecifika indikatorer fr operativa program av typ II (men inte fr operativa program av typ I).
OP II programmes concern by definition very diverse operations targeted to very specific end-recipients. 
Operativa program av typ II omfattar per definition mycket varierande typer av insatser som r riktade till klart avgrnsade grupper av slutmottagare.
OP II type of programmes concern very diverse operations (see Commission reply to paragaph 53) and not all lend themselves toŇbridgingÓ function, for instance when they target children or elderly. 
Operativa program av typ II omfattar mycket varierande typer av insatser, (se kommissionens svar p punkt 53) som inte alla r lmpade fr att fylla en "verbryggande" funktion, exempelvis om mlgruppen r barn eller ldre.
Moreover, the FEAD Regulation does not impose Member States to collect data on FEAD end recipients to transition to ESF measures. 
I Fead-frordningen krvs det heller inte av medlemsstaterna att samla in data om Fead-slutmottagare som ska verg till ESF-tgrder.
Measuring systematically the flow of FEAD recipients may not be proportionate. 
Att gra systematiska mtningar av fldet av Fead-mottagare kan vara oproportionerligt.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57. The monitoring of the Europe 2020 poverty targets is done twice during the FEAD implementation, in a qualitative way. 
SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 57. vervakningen av mlgruppen fr fattigdom i Europa 2020 utfrs tv gnger under genomfrandet av Fead p ett kvalitativt stt.
Quantitative monitoring on poverty reduction is already done in the European Semester. 
Kvantitativ vervakning av fattigdomsminskning utfrs redan under den europeiska planeringsterminen.
The impact of FEAD will be assessed through the ex-post evaluation (in December 2024), once the programmes will have been completed. 
Feads effekt kommer att bedmas genom en efterhandsutvrdering (i december 2024) nr programmen har slutfrts.
The Commission agrees with the principle of targeting the aid to those most in need but considers that the variety of approaches in identifying the most deprived is in line with subsidiarity and the FEAD being complementary to different national social contexts. 
Kommissionen instmmer med principen att rikta bistndet till dem som har det smst stllt, och anser att de olika tillvgagngsstten fr att identifiera dem som har det smst stllt str i linje med subsidiaritetsprincipen: Kommissionen instmmer ocks med att Fead kompletterar olika sociala program p nationellt plan.
Accompanying measures in OP I are being monitored in the Annual Implementation Reports of Member States, in a dedicated section. 
De kompletterande tgrderna i de operativa programmen av typ I fljs upp i medlemsstaternas rliga genomfranderapporter, i en srskild del.
In addition, the survey of end recipients carried out twice over the programming period by the Managing Authorities (evaluation) gives important information on the type of accompanying measures in the various Member States and on the usefulness of advice and guidance by Managing Authorities. 
Underskningen av slutmottagarna som de frvaltande myndigheterna utfr tv gnger under programperioden (utvrderingen) innehller dessutom viktig information om typen av kompletterande tgrder i olika medlemsstater.
The survey requirement is kept in the ESF+ Commission proposal for post-2020. 
Kravet p att genomfra en underskning finns kvar i kommissionens frslag till Europeiska socialfonden+ avseende perioden efter 2020.
In most of the Member States, FEAD is focused on the most deprived and the ESF on people whose basic needs are met and are closer to the labour market. 
I de flesta medlemsstater riktas Fead-medlen till dem som har det allra smst stllt, medan ESF-medlen inriktas p personer vars grundlggande behov har tillgodosetts, och som r i nrmare kontakt med arbetsmarknaden.
Recommendation 1 Better targeting of aid (a) The Commission accepts the recommendation 1(a) and considers that all the conditions for its fulfilment are ensured by the CommissionŐs proposals for the ESF+ and Common Provisions Regulation (CPR). 
Rekommendation 1 Đ rikta stdet bttre a) Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 1 a och anser att alla villkor fr dess uppfyllande har skerstllts genom kommissionens frslag fr Europeiska socialfonden+ och frordningen om gemensamma bestmmelser.
For the 2021-2027 programming period, the Commission proposal for the Common Provision Regulation (which will apply to this type of support currently being funded by the FEAD) requires that each programme shall set out the main challenges, including social challenges. 
Fr programperioden 2021Đ2027 krvs det enligt kommissionens frslag till frordning om gemensamma bestmmelser (som kommer att glla fr denna typ av bistnd som fr nrvarande finansieras av Fead) att de viktigaste utmaningarna ska anges i varje program, inklusive sociala utmaningar.
This means that this information will be more developed in programmes. (b) The Commission accepts recommendation 1(b) and considers that all the conditions for its fulfilment are ensured by the CommissionŐs proposals for the ESF+ and Common Provisions Regulation. 
4 b) Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 1 b och anser att alla villkor fr dess uppfyllande har skerstllts genom kommissionens frslag fr Europeiska socialfonden+ och frordningen om gemensamma bestmmelser.
The definition of the Ômost deprivedŐ in the ESF+, notably Art. 2(13) specifies that the need for assistance is being established according to objective criteria set by national competent authorities in consultation with relevant stakeholders. 
I definitionen av Ňdem som har det smst stlltÓ i Europeiska socialfonden+, srskilt artikel 2.13, anges att behovet av bistnd faststlls p grundval av objektiva kriterier som utarbetas av behriga nationella myndigheter i samrd med berrda aktrer.
This is an important provision, since FEAD complements national social policies and the targeting approach should be in line with subsidiarity. 
Detta r en viktig bestmmelse, eftersom Fead kompletterar nationell socialpolitik, och metoden fr hur stdet ska mlinriktas br vara frenlig med subsidiaritetsprincipen.
Therefore, the national approaches may still vary taking into account local needs, also depending on the type of the assistance. (c) The Commission partially accepts recommendation 1(c). 
P grund av detta kan nationella tillvgagngsstt variera med hnsyn till lokala behov, och ven beroende av typen av bistnd. c) Kommissionen godtar delvis rekommendation 1 c.
The Commission considers that the conditions for its fulfilment are ensured by the CommissionŐs proposals for the ESF+ and Common Provisions Regulation. 4 
Kommissionen anser att alla villkor fr att uppfylla rekommendationen har skerstllts genom kommissionens frslag till ny grundfrordning fr Europeiska socialfonden+ och ny frordning om gemensamma bestmmelser.
The need for the Member States to refer to the intervention logic is implicit in the submission of a programme for financing by the Fund in order to comply with ESF+ on the content of the priority.The need for the Member States to refer to reference values is already covered by ESF+. The Commission objects to set quantified targets in the programmes because: setting targets and benchmarks for OP I type of operations is not considered meaningful. 
Kravet att medlemsstaterna ska hnvisa till referensvrden regleras redan inom ramen fr Europeiska socialfonden+. Kommissionen motstter sig rekommendationen att ange kvantifierade ml i programmen av fljande skl: Det anses inte vara meningsfullt att faststlla ml och riktmrken nr det gller insatser fr operativa program av typ I. Situationen och behoven i enskilda medlemslnder varierar under en spass lng period som sju r.
National situation/needs evolve over the 7 years period; Member States should have flexibility to address over time different target groups or complement national policies with different instruments. 
Medlemsstaterna br ges den flexibilitet som behvs fr att kunna hjlpa mlgrupper som frndras ver tiden och fr att komplettera nationella tgrder med olika instrument.
Recommendation 2 Safeguarding social inclusion measures for recipients of basic material assistance The Commission notes that recommendation 2(a) is addressed to Member States. 
Rekommendation 2 Đ garantera tgrder fr social delaktighet fr mottagare av grundlggande materiellt bistnd Kommissionen noterar att rekommendation 2 a och 2 b riktar sig till medlemsstaterna.
The Commission partially accepts the recommendation 2(b) as Article 17(4) of the proposed ESF+ regulation specifies that the delivery of food and/or basic material assistance may be complemented with accompanying measures aiming at the social inclusion of the most deprived persons. 
Kommissionen godtar delvis rekommendation 2 b, eftersom det anges i artikel 17.4 i den freslagna frordningen om Europeiska socialfonden+ att utdelningen av livsmedel och/eller grundlggande materiellt bistnd fr kompletteras med stdtgrder som syftar till att frmja social delaktighet fr dem som har det smst stllt.
Although these accompanying measures are not an obligation for the Member States, the Commission encourages them to fully tap the synergies provided in the ESF+ Regulation proposal to combine different strands of social inclusion support to the most deprived. 
De kompletterande tgrderna r inte obligatoriska fr medlemsstaterna, men kommissionen uppmanar medlemsstaterna att fullt utnyttja de synergier som blir mjliga enligt frslaget till frordning om Europeiska socialfonden+ fr att kombinera olika former av std till social delaktighet fr dem som har det smst stllt.
Recommendation 3 Improving the assessment of the social inclusion of FEAD end recipients The Commission accepts recommendation 3 insofar as it concerns the Commission. 5 
Rekommendation 3 Đ frbttra vervakningen av den sociala delaktigheten fr slutmottagare av Fead-std Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 3 i den utstrckning som den rr kommissionen. 5
Audit team This ECAŐs special reports set out the results of its audits of EU policies and programmes, or of management-related topics from specific budgetary areas. 
Granskningsteam I vra srskilda rapporter redovisar vi resultatet av vra revisioner av EU:s politik och program eller av frvaltningsteman kopplade till specifika budgetomrden.
The audit was led by ECA Member George Pufan, supported by Patrick Weldon, Head of Private Office and Mircea Radulescu, Private Office Attach; Emmanuel Rauch, Principal Manager; Naiara Zabala Eguiraun, Dana Moraru and Carmen Gruber, Auditors. 
Revisionsarbetet leddes av ledamoten George Pufan, med std av Patrick Weldon (kanslichef), Mircea Radulescu (attach), Emmanuel Rauch (frstechef) och Naiara Zabala Eguiraun, Dana Moraru och Carmen Gruber (revisorer).
From left to right: Mircea Radulescu, George Pufan, Carmen Gruber, Patrick Weldon, Emmanuel Rauch 42 
44 Frn vnster till hger: Mircea Radulescu, George Pufan, Carmen Gruber, Patrick Weldon, Emmanuel Rauch
Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 30.5.2018 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 8.1.2019 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 27.2.2019 CommissionŐs (or other auditeeŐs) official replies received in all languages 15.3.2019 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1804-7 doi:10.2865/680043 QJ-AB-19-003-EN-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1798-9 doi:10.2865/215557 QJ-AB-19-003-EN-Q 
Hndelse Datum Revisionsplanen antas / Revisionen inleds 30.5.2018 Den preliminra rapporten skickas till kommissionen (eller till ett annat revisionsobjekt) 8.1.2019 Den slutliga rapporten antas efter det kontradiktoriska frfarandet 27.2.2019 Svaren frn kommissionen (eller frn ett annat revisionsobjekt) har tagits emot p alla sprk 15.3.2019 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1773-6 doi:10.2865/140693 QJ-AB-19-003-SV-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1782-8 doi:10.2865/267914 QJ-AB-19-003-SV-Q
In spite of the overall wealth of the European Union, almost one in four Europeans is still at risk of poverty or social exclusion. 
Trots det allmnna vlstndet i Europeiska unionen riskerar nstan var fjrde EU-medborgare fortfarande att drabbas av fattigdom eller social utestngning.
The fight against poverty and social exclusion is at the heart of the UnionŐs ŇEurope 2020Ó strategy. 
Kampen mot fattigdom och social utestngning utgr krnan i EU:s strategi Europa 2020.
The Commission devotes Ű3.8 billion through the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) for the period 2014-2020. 
Kommissionen har avsatt 3,8 miljarder euro genom fonden fr europeiskt bistnd till dem som har det smst stllt (Fead) fr perioden 2014Đ2020.
The FEAD aim is to alleviate the forms of extreme poverty, with the greatest social exclusion impact, such as homelessness, child poverty and food deprivation. 
Fead syftar till att lindra de typer av extrem fattigdom som i strst utstrckning leder till social utestngning, ssom hemlshet, barnfattigdom och livsmedelsbrist.
We assessed whether the FEAD was designed to be an effective tool to achieve this goal. 
Vi bedmde om Fead har utformats som ett ndamlsenligt verktyg fr att uppn detta ml.
We found that the FEAD has been well embedded in the social policy framework. 
Vi konstaterade att Fead har integrerats vl i den socialpolitiska ramen.
Moreover, it contributes to Member StatesŐ approaches in alleviating poverty. 
Fonden bidrar ocks till medlemsstaternas strategier fr att minska fattigdomen.