natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The lack of codification brings a twofold risk: that procedural conflicts will arise in the course of an investigation with the subjects of the investigation, and that court proceedings brought after an investigation will collapse owing to non-compliance with the formalities introduced to guarantee the application of the principles of transparency and the adversarial procedure (4). 
Avsaknaden av kodifiering innebr en dubbel risk: dels att det under utredningen kan uppst konflikter om frfaranden med de personer som utreds, dels att de rttsliga tgrder som vidtas till fljd av en utredning misslyckas eftersom man sidosatt formaliteter som skall garantera tillmpning av principen om insyn och den kontradiktoriska principen (4).
More generally, as with the assessments, the sample of investigations examined showed that OLAFŐs actual investigative activity was often rather limited. 
Mer allmnt, och som fr utvrderingarna, visade stickprovet av underskta utredningar att det egentliga utredningsarbete som utfrdes av OLAF ofta var ganska begrnsat.
The use by the Office of its powers to carry out on-the-spot investigations, examine witnesses and question suspects is the exception rather than the rule. 
Byrn anvnder endast undantagsvis sina befogenheter att underska p platsen, hra vittnen och frhra misstnkta.
These specific investigative acts were most common in the customs sector. 
Det r inom tullsektorn som man oftast har anvnt sig av dessa specifika utred-ningstgrder.
On the other hand, the Office often requests information from the investigative agencies of certain Member States, notably Italy. 
Dremot begr byrn ganska ofta upplysningar frn nationella utredningsmyndigheter, srskilt i Italien.
For example, when investigating shared-management expenditure the Office usually asks for the documentation it needs (2) Annual Report concerning the financial year 2000, paragraph 7.49 (OJ C 359, 15.12.2001). 
Nr det gller utredningar p omrdet fr utgifter med delad frvaltning begr byrn i allmnhet in de upplysningar den anser sig behva. (2) rsrapport fr budgetret 2000, punkt 7.49 (EGT C 359, 15.12.2001).
(3) The provisions governing investigative procedure are scattered among a number of texts and could usefully be consolidated (Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999, Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95, interinstitutional agreements, the IDOC Memorandum and the Staff Regulations). 
(3) Bestmmelserna fr utredningsfrfaranden r spridda p olika texter och det vore lmpligt att dessa konsoliderades (frordning (EG) nr 1073/1999, frordning (Euratom, EG) nr 2185/96, frordning (EG, Euratom) nr 2988/95, interinstitutionella verenskommelser, samfrstndsavtal med IDOC och tjnstefreskrifterna fr tjnstemn i Europeiska gemenskaperna).
(4) The second recommendation in the CommissionŐs October 2003 evaluation report concerns the establishment of a corpus of administrative rules for the implementation of investigative measures. 
(4) Idenandrarekommendationenikommissionensutvrderingsrapport frn oktober 2003 frordas att det utarbetas en korpus med frvaltningsbestmmelser dr reglerna fr utredningstgrder faststlls.
18.8.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/9 to be submitted for it to study and analyse before, if appropriate, carrying out an on-the-spot visit (1). 
18.8.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 202/9 Dessa gs igenom och analyseras, vid behov p platsen (1). ven fr utredningar som gller utgifter med direkt frvaltning, dr byrn r huvudutredare, inskrnker man sig ofta till att analysera dokumentation som hmtats frn kommissionens frvaltningsavdelningar.
In such cases the Office assembles and comments on the evidence to be submitted to the judicial authorities in the Member States, but it does not provide any evidence beyond that which was already available to the managing departments. 
I dessa renden sammanstller och kommenterar byrn de dokument i rendet som skall verfras till de rttsliga myndigheterna i medlemsstaterna men lgger inte till kompletterande bevisning utver vad frvaltningsavdelningarna redan hade tillgng till.
29. While the Office must be able to produce its final reports on investigations in the context of judicial proceedings, in the case of shared-management operations these are addressed to the managing authorities in the Member States (customs services, paying agencies, etc.). 
29. ven om byrn skall ha kapacitet att utarbeta avslutande utredningsrapporter inom ramen fr rttsliga frfaranden r rapporterna vid delad frvaltning riktade till frvaltningsmyndigheter i medlemsstaterna (tullmyndigheter, utbetalningsstllen etc.).
For that reason they need to be clearly argued and must contain relevant, precise and balanced conclusions. 
Innehllet i rapporterna skall drfr vara tydligt och slutsatserna relevanta, exakta och balanserade.
The most common inadequacy was failure to quantify the fraud, even though investigations usually related to the misappropriation of funds. 
Den vanligaste bristen gllde kvantifiering av bedrgeriet trots att utredningarna oftast handlar om frskingring av medel.
The follow-up stage 30. 
Uppfljningsfasen 30.
OLAF distinguishes between five kinds of follow-up: (a) financial follow-up, which is intended to ensure the recovery of funds misappropriated from the Community budget; (b) administrative follow-up, which aims to improve the procedures for the management of budgetary revenue and expenditure; (c) judicial follow-up, which aims to provide information on the progress of criminal proceedings and the presentation, where appropriate, of claims for damages by the institutions concerned; (1) Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 explicitly provides for the communication of the information necessary for OLAF investigations. (d) disciplinary follow-up, which takes the form of determining what action the institutions intend to take in response to the OfficeŐs recommendations (2); (e) legislative follow-up, the purpose of which is to amend Community legislation in order to render it less susceptible to fraud. 
OLAF skiljer mellan fem typer av uppfljning: a) Ekonomisk uppfljning fr att se till att belopp som fr-skingrats frn gemenskapsbudgeten terbetalas. b) Administrativ uppfljning fr att frbttra frfarandena fr frvaltning av budgetinkomster och budgetutgifter. c) Rttslig uppfljning vars syfte r att hlla sig informerad om hur de straffrttsliga frfarandena utvecklas och de fall nr institutionerna vcker enskild talan som mlsgande. (1) I bestmmelserna i artikel 7 i frordning (EG) nr 1073/1999 faststlls uttryckligen att upplysningar som r ndvndiga fr OLAF:s utredningar skall verlmnas. d) Disciplinr uppfljning som innebr att man informerar sig om vilka tgrder de berrda institutionerna tnker vidta till fljd av byrns rekommendationer (2). e) Uppfljning i lagstiftningshnseende som syftar till att anpassa gemenskapslagstiftningen fr att minska exponeringen nr det gller riskerna fr bedrgeri.
31. 
31. tiskt gnas t uppfljning.
However, the information obtained shows that it is not the main activity of the units concerned. 
De insamlade indikationerna visar dock att det inte r den viktigaste verksamheten vid de berrda enheterna.
In general, the OfficeŐs follow-up activity has provided little added value, especially where coordination and assistance were concerned (see Annex II). 
Mervrdet i byrns uppfljning visar sig i allmnhet ha varit svagt, srskilt nr det gllde samordning eller std (se bilaga II).
The OfficeŐs role in financial follow-up should be limited to calculating the amounts of the sums to be recovered. 
I frga om den ekonomiska uppfljningen br byrns roll begrnsas till att berkna de belopp som skall terkrvas.
Once they are known, it is for the authorising officers in the operational Directorates-General and the authorities in the Member States to issue recovery orders and to ensure that payment is received on the due date. 
Nr dessa vl r knda r det utanordnarna vid de operativa generaldirektoraten och myndigheter i medlemsstaterna som skall utfrda betalningskrav och se till att dessa blir betalda p frfallodagen.
For its part, DG Budget must ensure that recovery orders are registered as soon as they are issued and that the authorising officers observe the timetable for recoveries. 
Det r GD Budgets uppgift att se till att betalningskraven registreras s snart de har utfrdats och att vervaka att utbetalarna fljer betalningsplanen fr inbetalningar.
Cases of negligence on the part of the authorising officers are to be referred to IDOC by DG Budget. 
Vid fall av frsummelse frn deras sida skall GD Budget kontakta byrn fr utredningar och disciplinrenden (IDOC).
Mobilising OLAF staff after the stage of calculating the amounts of the sums to be recovered is thus a duplication of effort already undertaken by the authorising officers. 
OLAF:s medverkan utver berkningen av belopp som skall terbetalas verlappar allts det arbete som utfrs av utanordnarna.
In the special case of the mutual assistance procedure in the customs and agriculture sectors there is no systematic follow-up by the Office (3). 
Byrns uppfljning i det speciella fall som gller frfarandet fr msesidigt bistnd (3) p tull-och jordbruksomrdet har inte varit systematisk.
The Office has established no rules for the continuous and consistent monitoring of progress within the framework of the procedures for requesting mutual assistance from the Member States, and the results of such requests are not clearly recorded. 
Byrn har inte faststllt normer fr en kontinuerlig och konsekvent vervakning av sdana framsteg som konstateras inom ramen fr frfarandena fr msesidigt bistnd som begrs frn medlemsstaterna, och resultaten av de vidtagna tgrderna r svrverskdliga.
Quality control procedures 33. 
Frfaranden fr kvalitetskontroll 33.
The weaknesses identified in the preceding paragraphs raise the question of the effectiveness of the OfficeŐs quality control systems. 
De svagheter som redovisas i ovanstende punkter vcker frgan om hur effektiva byrns system fr kvalitetskontroll r.
The OLAF manual 34. 
OLAF:s handbok 34.
The OLAF manual describes the work of every OLAF department and most of the current administrative procedures. 
I OLAF:s handbok beskrivs verksamheten vid var och en av dess avdelningar och de flesta gllande administrativa frfaranden.
Investigative activities are only dealt with in a small section giving details of existing practices, by reference in particular to the stages of the CMS. 
Endast ett litet avsnitt i handboken handlar om utredningsverksamheten med redovisningar av vilka arbetsmetoder som anvnds, bland annat genom att hnvisa till faserna i rendehanteringssystemet (CMS).
There is a disproportionate emphasis on the purely legal aspects of operations, to the detriment of the practical aspects of organising and conducting investigations and the (2) Article 9(4) of Regulation No (EC) 1073/1999 on the OfficeŐs investigations requires the Community institutions and bodies to inform the Office of disciplinary action taken in response to the OfficeŐs recommendations. 
Det har lagts oproportionerligt stor vikt vid operationernas rent juridiska aspekter p bekostnad av de praktiska aspekterna av utredningarnas organisation och (2) I bestmmelserna i artikel 9.4 i frordning (EG) nr 1073/1999 om byrns utredningar krvs att gemenskapens institutioner eller organ skall informera byrn om vilka disciplinra tgrder som vidtas till fljd av byrns rekommendationer.
(3) Council Regulation (EC) No 515/97 of 13 March 1997 (OJ L 82, 22.3.1997, p. 
(3) Rdets frordning (EG) nr 515/97 av den 13 mars 1997 (EGT L 82, 22.3.1997, s.
1). C 202/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 18.8.2005 contribution expected from the different parties concerned, in particular the authorities in the Member States and especially the OfficeŐs management. 
C 202/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 18.8.2005 genomfrande samt p vad som frvntas av olika berrda parter, srskilt myndigheter i medlemsstaterna och framfr allt byrns ledning.
The role of the Executive Board, which is a crucial element in the management of investigations, should be explained in greater detail. Supervision of the management of investigations 35. 
Srskilt styrelsens roll, som r en nyckelfaktor i handlggningen av utredningar, br frklaras tydligare. vervakning av handlggningen av utredningar 35.
OLAF inherited the organisational culture of UCLAF, under which the investigators conducted most of their investigations in isolation and without real supervision. While it is true that investigative confidentiality is necessary to avoid pressures that may impede the process of investigation, it is nonetheless essential that the management of an investigation office should check not only that the investigators do not stray from their objectives, but also that they carry out their duties with due diligence. 
OLAF har rvt UCLAF:s organisationskultur dr utredarna genomfrde de flesta av sina utredningar p egen hand, utan egentlig vervakning. ven om det krvs sekretess fr att undvika ptryckningar som kan skada utredningsarbetet r det icke desto mindre vsentligt att ledningen fr ett utredningskon-tor vervakar arbetet fr att kontrollera inte endast att utredaren inte avviker frn sina ml utan att han ocks utfr sina uppgifter skyndsamt.
This was not always the case. 
S har inte alltid varit fallet.
Management supervision of this sort is also indispensable for guaranteeing the sound use of resources. 
Sdan vervakning r dessutom oumbrlig fr att garantera en god resursanvndning.
36. While the CMS and the establishment of a registry have now brought the necessary order to the record-keeping, physical location and structure of investigation files, this system has yet to be transformed into a real management tool to enable the responsible officers in the Investigations Directorate to be better informed of the progress of the operations for which they are responsible, to prepare the necessary actions and to ensure that they are carried out within the stipulated deadlines. 
36. ven om rendehanteringssystemet (CMS) och upprttandet av ett register nu har bringat den ordning som saknades i utredningsrendenas registrering, fysiska lokalisering och struktur, terstr det att omvandla detta system till ett verkligt frvaltningsverktyg som gr det mjligt fr de ansvariga fr utrednings-direktoratet att ha bttre knnedom om lget i de utredningar som de ansvarar fr, frbereda de tgrder som skall vidtas och se till att dessa utfrs inom de angivna tidsfristerna.
Just because follow-up is initiated, it does not follow that there will be a concrete result (1) (recovery or criminal/disciplinary penalty). 
Bara fr att en uppfljning har inletts r det inte skert att denna kommer att leda till konkreta resultat (1) (betalningskrav eller straffpfljd eller disciplinr tgrd).
In other words, initiating follow-up is not a relevant indicator of success. 
Med andra ord: inledande av en uppfljning r inte en relevant resultatindikator.
Nor is the fact that files have been forwarded to the judicial authorities significant. 
Att renden verlmnats till rttsliga myndigheter r inte heller signifikativt.
This is because the evidence presented by the Office may not be deemed sufficient by the national authorities, while the acts constituting an offence may be time-barred. 
Detta beror p att de nationella myndigheterna kan bedma den bevisning som byrn lgger fram som otillrcklig, samtidigt som de hndelser som utgr lagvertrdel-sen kan ha preskriberats.
As regards internal investigations, when the Office has managed to assemble evidence concerning offences committed by staff of the Community institutions, it has often been very difficult to get cases taken up by the judicial authorities in the countries where the institutions concerned by the offences are located (2), either because those authorities lack clear procedures for transferring (1) See the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 10 July 2003, Commission v EIB, paragraph 164. 
Nr det gller interna utredningar, nr byrn har lyckats samla in bevisning fr att vertrdelser har begtts av anstllda vid gemenskapsinstitutionerna, har det ofta varit mycket svrt att f de rttsliga myndigheterna i de lnder dr institutionerna r placerade eller dr vertrdelserna har begtts (2) att ta upp rendena, antingen fr att myndigheterna saknar tydliga frfaranden fr att fra ver dessa fall till (1) Se domen frn Europeiska gemenskapernas domstol av den 10 juli 2003, ml kommissionen mot EIB, punkt 164.
(2) Specifically, Belgium and Luxembourg. these cases to their own courts or because they do not assign to them the priority desired by the Office (3). 
(2) Srskilt Belgien och Luxemburg. sin egen lagstiftning eller fr att de inte ger rendet den prioritet som byrn skulle nska (3).
In Brussels and Luxembourg, the principal workplaces of the institutions, the Office should clarify once again with the judicial authorities concerned the practical steps to be taken so that cases transferred to them no longer disappear from view. 
I Bryssel och Luxemburg, som r institutionernas huvudsakliga arbetsorter, r det lmpligt att byrn tillsammans med berrda rttsliga myndigheter nyo klargr hur man praktiskt skall g till vga fr att verlmnade renden inte lngre skall frsvinna ur sikte.
Moreover, the OfficeŐs recommendations regarding disciplinary action are not always taken up by the institutions or bodies concerned. 
Vidare fljer inte alltid de berrda institutionerna och organen byrns rekommendationer i disciplinrenden.
Internal audit 38. 
Internrevision 38.
Its main task is to keep the Director informed of the effectiveness of the internal control procedures. 
Dess viktigaste uppgift r att hlla direktren informerad om effektiviteten i frfarandena fr intern kontroll.
Since it was set up in 2001, its work has essentially concerned the OfficeŐs administrative management and non-investigative activities. 
Sedan den inrttades 2001 har den frmst gnat sig t byrns administrativa frvaltning och den icke utred-ningsrelaterade verksamheten.
It has also been required to perform a variety of tasks in support of the management and to back up the task force that was created in July 2003 to handle the Eurostat case files. 
Dess hjlp har ocks efterfrgats fr att utfra olika uppgifter till std fr ledningen och fr att frstrka den arbetsgrupp som bildades i juli 2003 fr att behandla rendena i Eurostat-affren.
The Internal Audit Unit has submitted no reports on the work of investigation. 
Internrevisionsenheten har inte lagt fram ngon rapport om utredningsverksamheten.
In particular, it has not assessed the correct functioning of the CMS or the reliability and relevance of the results indicators. 
Man har framfr allt inte bedmt hur rendehanteringssystemet fungerar eller resultatindikatorernas tillfrlitlighet och relevans.
As at the end of 2004, despite its own risk analyses, the Internal Audit Unit had still not contributed in any significant way to improving the systems for managing investigations. 
I slutet av 2004 hade internrevisionsenheten, trots sina egna riskanalyser, nnu inte lmnat ngot riktigt bidrag till frbttringen av systemen fr handlggning av utredningsarbetet.
The OLAF Executive Board 40. 
OLAF:s styrelse 40.
An Executive Board comprising most of the heads of units directly or indirectly responsible for investigations was set up in 2002 under the chairmanship of the Director of Investigations. 
En styrelse med direktren fr utredningar som ordfrande och bestende av de flesta enhetschefer som direkt eller indirekt ansvarar fr utredningar tillsattes 2002.
It meets once a week to examine the reports that are filed at each stage of an investigation (evaluation, closure, and post-follow-up). 
Styrelsen samlas en gng i veckan fr att g igenom de rapporter som lmnas in efter varje utredningsfas (utvrdering, avslutning, avslutning av uppfljning).
It was established to meet two major objectives: (a) to improve the quality of reports by drawing on the experience of the various services; (b) to ensure the consistency of the decisions proposed to the Director of the Office by the various investigation teams. 
Den inrttades fr att uppfylla tv stora mlsttningar: a) Frbttra rapporternas kvalitet genom att utnyttja de samlade erfarenheterna frn olika avdelningar. b) Se till att de beslut som de olika utredningsteamen lgger fram fr byrns direktr r enhetliga.
(3) In this connection, see the OfficeŐs analysis in Section 1.3.2 of its Complementary Evaluation Report, SEC(2004) 1370 of 26 October 2004. 
(3) Se i detta sammanhang byrns analys i punkt 1.3.2 i sin kompletterande utvrderingsrapport (SEK(2004) 1370, 26.10.2004).
18.8.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 202/11 41. 
18.8.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 202/11 41.
While this new feature undeniably constitutes an advance in the way cases are handled, its success as a means of controlling the management of investigations is still limited, in particular because of the limited time the Board Members have to examine all the files. 
Medan denna frndring tveklst frbttrat hanteringen av renden r dess framgngar som medel fr att f kontroll ver handlggningen av utredningar blandade, srskilt p grund av den begrnsade tid styrelsens ledamter har till sitt frfogande fr att g igenom alla renden.
Thus, despite the intervention of the Board, investigations have been started on the basis of inadequate assessment, delays in carrying them out have not been monitored beyond the stage of informing the Supervisory Committee, and investigations may be passed on to follow-up units before the work of finding evidence has been completed. 
Trots styrelsens ingripande har det drfr inletts utredningar som baserats p otillrckliga utvrderingar, frseningar i genomfrandet har inte fljts upp utver en anmlan till vervakningskommittn och utredningar har verlmnats till uppfljningsenheterna innan vissa skningar efter bevis nnu inte avslutats.
Activity reports 42. 
Verksamhetsrapporter 42.
Anti-fraud operations are the subject of various reports, all of which are part of OLAFŐs external supervision since they are addressed to the Council and the European Parliament. 
Bedrgeribekmpning r freml fr olika rapporter som alla bidrar till OLAF:s externa vervakning eftersom de r stllda till rdet och Europaparlamentet.
The Office submits an annual activity report, the Commission presents an annual report on the implementation of its policy for the protection of its financial interests, OLAFŐs Supervisory Committee draws up an annual report and Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 requires an evaluation of the OfficeŐs activities after three years of existence. 
Byrn lgger varje r fram en verksamhetsrapport, kommissionen lgger fram en rlig rapport om genomfrandet av sin politik fr skydd av gemenskapernas ekonomiska intressen, OLAF:s vervakningskommitt upprttar en rsrapport och i artikel 15 i frordning (EG) nr 1073/1999 krvs att byrns verksamhet skall utvrderas efter tre r.
The presentation of the OfficeŐs activity reports has improved over the years. 
Presentationen av byrns verksamhetsrapporter har frbttrats med ren.
Reporting has gained in clarity now that it is supported by CMS statistical data and the analyses are less focused on questions of law and investigation policy and more on case studies. 
Rapporteringen har blivit tydligare sedan den baseras p statistik frn rendehanteringssystemet och det i strre utstrckning r fallstudier n juridiska frgor eller utredningspolicy som analyseras.
The reliability of the statistical data must be enhanced still further by recording operations in greater detail and updating files more quickly. 
Statistikens tillfrlitlighet br frbttras ytterligare genom att registreringen av operationer blir noggrannare och rendena uppdateras snabbare.