natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission considers that the Court’s conclusion that the FP6 instruments audited had promoted effective research collaboration between project participants (see paragraph 58) reflects well on the Commission’s overall management of these instruments. 
Kommissionen anser att revisionsrttens slutsats att de granskade instrumenten i sjtte ramprogrammet har frmjat ett ndamlsenligt samarbete mellan projektdeltagarna (se punkt 58) vl avspeglar kommissionens vergripande ledning av dessa instrument.
The Commission has actively sought to address any problems encountered, within the constraints imposed by the existing legislative framework, and continues to do so under FP7. 35. 
Kommissionen har aktivt arbetat fr lsa problem som har uppsttt inom ramen fr begrnsningarna i den befintliga rttsliga ramen, och fortstter att gra s i sjunde ramprogrammet.
The Commission provided guidance material to the actors involved in order to facilitate their understanding of the new instruments. 
Kommissionen frsg de berrda aktrerna med vgledningsmaterial fr att hjlpa dem att frst hur de nya instrumenten fungerar.
A very high percentage of coordinators and participants in the survey apparently did understand the distinction between the two instruments (see the Court’s Figure 7). 
En mycket hg procentandel av de samordnare och deltagare som tillfrgades i underskningen frstod uppenbarligen inte skillnaden mellan de tv instrumenten (se diagram 7 i revisionsrttens rapport).
It is also to be expected that coordinators would have a better understanding of these than other participants. 
Det var ven frvntat att samordnarna skulle ha en bttre frstelse fr instrumenten n deltagarna.
The European research community by and large understood and used well the new instruments, as evidenced by Figure 7 itself. 
P det hela taget frstod och anvnde det europeiska forskningssamfundet de nya instrumenten vl, vilket ven framgr av diagram 7.
The Commission has acted as quickly as possible given the late adoption of the FP6 legal acts by the legislators. 
Kommissionen har agerat s snabbt som mjligt med tanke p lagstiftarnas sena antagande av rttsakterna fr sjtte ramprogrammet.
Detailed brochures and ‘Provisions for implementing’ for all the instruments were already available in November 2002, well before the production of the model contracts. 
Detaljerade broschyrer och ÓgenomfrandebestmmelserÓ fr alla instrument fanns tillgngliga redan i november 2002, lngt fre det att modellkontrak-ten utarbetades.
A large number of guidance documents have been produced and published on the internet. 
Ett stort antal riktlinjer har tagits fram och publicerats p Internet.
Additionally, targeted events for coordinators, to which all projects have been invited, addressed in particular any questions they might have had on the specificities of the instruments. 
Dessutom anordnades srskilda trffar fr samordnare, som alla projekt bjudits in till, dr man srskilt tog upp de eventuella frgor som de kunde ha om detaljerade aspekter av programmen.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 49. 
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 49.
The Commission is pleased that the Court appreciates its continuous efforts to promote better understanding of the new instruments under FP6, including its quick response to external evaluations. 
Kommissionen glder sig ver att revisionsrtten uppskattar kommissionens kontinuerliga insatser fr att frbttra frstelsen av de nya instrumenten i sjtte ramprogrammet, bland annat kommissionens snabba svar p externa utvrderingar.
The European research community by and large understood and used the new instruments well. 
P det hela taget frstod och anvnde det europeiska forskningssamfundet de nya instrumenten vl.
The introduction of new instruments unavoidably brought the need for proposers to become familiar with new notions in terms of the negotiations to be carried out and the data to be submitted, elements that very often made necessary further contacts and exchanges between participants themselves, an always time-consuming process. 
Infrandet av nya instrument ledde oundvikligen till att de skande mste stta sig in i de nya begreppen med tanke p kontrakts-frhandlingarna och de uppgifter som mste lmnas in, vilket mycket ofta gjorde det ndvndigt med ytterligare kontakter och utbyten mellan deltagarna, ngot som alltid r en tidskrvande process.
Further, the obligation imposed on the Commission by the legislator (the Council, in this case) to receive a (positive) opinion on all IPs and NoEs to be funded (irrespective of the amount of Community contribution) contributed to making the time-to-contract longer. 
Den skyldighet som kommissionen lagts av lagstiftaren (i detta fall rdet) att inhmta ett (positivt) yttrande om alla integrerade projekt och expertntverk som skulle finansieras (oavsett beloppet fr gemenskapens bidrag) innebar dessutom att det tog lngre tid tills kontrakten kunde undertecknas.
Moreover, the time is comparable to that of other major funding agencies in the world. 
Tiden fr kontraktsunder-tecknande r jmfrbar med andra stora finansieringsorgan i vrlden.
The Commission acknowledges the Court’s comments. However, the Commission recalls that one of the most important aspects of these new instruments, repeatedly brought forward in various guidance documents, was the enhanced role of the consortia themselves (and, in particular, of the coordinators) concerning the internal management of the project. 
Kommissionen vill dock pminna om att en av de viktigaste aspekterna i dessa nya instrument, vilket upprepade gnger har lyfts fram i de olika riktlinjerna, r den strkta rollen fr konsortierna (srskilt samordnarnas roll) nr det gller den interna styrningen av projekten.
It recognises however, that there have been some cases, often for individual and specific reasons, where independent review was not carried out. 
Kommissionen tillstr emellertid att det har frekommit vissa fall dr oberoende granskningar inte har genomfrts, ofta av enskilda och specifika skl.
A common template for the reviewers’ report was prepared for all Research DGs. 
En gemensam mall fr projektgranskarnas rapporter utarbetades fr alla generaldirektorat med ansvar fr forskningsrelaterade frgor.
A basic common guidance document was also prepared and given to the different services to adapt to their own needs. 
Grundlggande dokument med riktlinjer utarbetades ven och lmnades till de olika tjnsteavdelningarna fr att de skulle kunna anpassa dem till sina egna behov.
The Commission would like to stress, however, that the EU contribution to the private sector under FP6 increased significantly by more than 1 billion euro in comparison to FP5. 
Kommissionen bekrftar revisionsrttens slutsatser, men vill betona att EU-bidraget till den privata sektorn i sjtte ramprogrammet kade avsevrt Đ med ver 1 miljard euro Đ jmfrt med femte ramprogrammet.
It is also true that the situation differs by sectors. 
Det stmmer ven att situationen skiljer sig mellan sektorerna.
The Commission considers that FP6 had a positive influence on industrial competitiveness. 
Kommissionen anser att sjtte ramprogrammet hade en positiv inverkan p den industriella konkurrenskraften.
Furthermore, it would like to add that when taking into account public and private organisations engaged in commercial activities (the business enterprise sector) participation rates are similar to those of FP5. 
Dessutom vill den tillgga att om man rknar med de offentliga och privata organisationer som bedriver kommersiella verksamheter (affrsfretagssektorn) ligger deltagandegraden p en liknande niv som fr femte forskningsprogrammet.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 57. 
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 57.
The Commission considers that the FPs have always been based on a sound intervention logic. 
Kommissionen anser att ramprogrammen alltid har baserats p en sund interventionslogik.
Under FP6, the legislative acts and the Commission’s work programmes and information material of various types provided a coherent stream and wealth of information on intervention logic, objectives, justification of the efforts and their European added value, actions envisaged, rationale and operational framework of application for all instruments to be used and other helpful information for the proposers and project participants. 
I sjtte ramprogrammet tillhandahlls genom rttsakterna, kommissionens arbetsprogram och kommissionens olika typer av informationsmaterial ett konsekvent flde av en stor mngd information om interventionslogik, ml, motiveringar av insatser och deras mervrde p EU-niv, planerade tgrder, logiska grunder och operativa till-lmpningsramar fr alla instrument som skulle anvndas och annan anvndbar information fr skande och projektdeltagare.
Despite the fact that this approach was not explicit in the Financial Regulation applicable at the moment of the FP6 preparation and adoption, essential elements of the ‘SMART’ approach were nevertheless taken up in the Commission’s work programmes under FP6. 
Trots att detta tillvgagngsstt inte angavs uttryckligen i den budgetfrordning som var tillmplig vid den tidpunkt d sjtte ramprogrammet fr forskning utarbetades och antogs, inlemmades de centrala aspekterna av SMART-strategin i kommissionens arbetsprogram fr sjtte ramprogrammet.
Under FP7, all work programmes contain expected impact statements, which correspond with the objectives, rationale and activities set out in the Specific Programmes. 
I sjunde ramprogrammet innehller alla arbetsprogram beskrivningar av frvntade effekter som motsvarar mlen, den logiska grunden och verksamheterna i de srskilda programmen.
The Commission considers that FP6 was properly monitored and evaluated. Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
Kommissionen anser att sjtte ramprogrammet vervakades och utvrderades p ett lmpligt stt. Srskild rapport nr 8/2009 Đ Expertntverk och integrerade projekt i gemenskapens forskningspolitik Đ uppnddes mlen?
40 Recommendation No 1 The Commission considers that the FPs have always been based on a sound intervention logic which has allowed effective evaluation and monitoring. 
40 Rekommendation nr 1 Kommissionen anser att ramprogrammen alltid har baserats p en sund interventionslogik som har mjliggjort ndamlsenlig utvrdering och vervakning.
Under FP7, which was developed on the basis of a detailed ex ante impact assessment, all work programmes contain expected impact statements, which correspond with the objectives, rationale and activities set out in the Specific Programmes. 
I sjunde ramprogrammet, som togs fram p grundval av en detaljerad frhandskonsekvensbedmning, innehller alla arbetsprogram beskrivningar av frvntade effekter som motsvarar mlen, den logiska grunden och verksamheterna i de srskilda programmen.
This will help further strengthen the evaluation and monitoring system. 
Detta kommer att bidra till att ytterligare strka utvrderings-och vervakningssystemet.
Under FP7, instead of being encapsulated in the ‘instruments’, research goals and research policy objectives, including those aiming at structuring research efforts, are clearly and explicitly set in the work programmes. 
I sjunde ramprogrammet anges forskningsmlen och de forskningspolitiska mlsttningarna tydligt och uttryckligen i arbetsprogrammen i stllet fr att kapslas in i instrumenten, vilket ven gller mlen fr att strukturera forskningsinsatserna.
The Commission welcomes the Court’s conclusion that the FP6 instruments covered by the audit had promoted a good level of research collaboration between project participants. 
Kommissionen vlkomnar revisionsrttens slutsats att de granskade instrumenten inom sjtte ramprogrammet hade frmjat ett ndamlsenligt samarbete mellan projektdeltagarna.
There was a large number of NoEs where lasting integration among partners was achieved and the overall quality of projects was deemed high (the overall assessment in Figure 5 shows the NoEs’ quality to be ‘acceptable’ and ‘good to excellent’ with a total percentage of above 80 %). 
Varaktig integration mellan partner uppnddes i ett stort antal av expertntverken, och den vergripande kvaliteten p projekten ansgs vara hg (den vergripande bedmningen av projektkvaliteten i diagram 5 visade att projekten var ÓgodtagbaraÓ och Óbra till mycket braÓ, med en procentandel p ver 80 procent).
Almost two thirds of NoEs achieved full restructuring of activities and integration between partners. 
En komplett omstrukturering av verksamheter och integration mellan parterna skedde inom nstan tv tredjedelar av expertntverken.
The possibility of continuing the financing of certain promising FP6 NoEs under FP7 is addressed on a case-by-case basis. 
Mjligheten att fortstta att finansiera vissa lovande expertntverk i sjunde forskningsprogrammet bedms frn fall till fall.
In fact, an FP6 NoE’s duration may be prolonged without new funding (cases of these currently exist). 
I sjlva verket kan varaktigheten fr ett expertntverk inom sjtte ramprogrammets frlngas att utan nya medel ansls (sdana fall finns fr nrvarande).
Moreover, new NoEs could be envisaged in duly justified cases. 
Dessutom kan nya expertntverk vervgas i vederbrligen motiverade fall.
A distinction has to be made between the possible dimension of financial integration and the co-financing principle governing any FP6 project. 
Det mste gras en tskillnad mellan den dimension av finansiell integration som ges i de riktlinjer som utfrdas av kommissionen fr de integrerade projekten och principen om samfinansiering som styr alla projekt inom sjtte ramprogrammet.
There has been no requirement on IP participants to attract other sources of funding beyond their own co-financing share. 
Det har inte funnits ngot krav p deltagarna i de integrerade projekten att dra till sig andra finansieringskllor frutom deras egen andel av samfinansieringen.
Recommendation No 2 The Commission has evaluated these FP6 instruments through various means. 
Rekommendation nr 2 Kommissionen har utvrderat de berrda instrumenten i sjtte ramprogrammet genom olika metoder.
With regard to a continued funding of FP6 NoEs, the Commission reached a similar conclusion following the Report of the Expert Group on the future of Networks of Excellence. Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
Nr det gller en fortsatt finansiering av expertntverken i sjtte ramprogrammet kom kommissionen fram till en liknande slutsats som i rapporten frn expertgruppen om framtiden fr expertntverken. Srskild rapport nr 8/2009 Đ Expertntverk och integrerade projekt i gemenskapens forskningspolitik Đ uppnddes mlen?
The Commission acknowledges the Court’s findings. Still, it points out that this did not diminish the FP’s role as a contributor to the promotion of industrial competitiveness. 
Kommissionen bekrftar revisionsrttens slutsatser, men vill dock ppeka att detta inte ledde till att ramprogrammens roll i frmjandet av den industriella konkurrenskraften frsvagades.
Furthermore, it would like to add that when taking into account public and private organisations engaged in commercial activities (the business enterprise sector) participation rates are similar to those of FP5. 
Kommissionen vill emellertid tillgga att om man rknar med de offentliga och privata organisationer som bedriver kommersiella verksamheter (affrsfretagssektorn) ligger deltagandegraden p en liknande niv som fr femte forskningsprogrammet.
Concerning FP7, it is still too early in the course of this seven-year-long FP to suggest any final judgment on the SMEs’ participation. 
I frga om sjunde ramprogrammet r det fortfarande fr tidigt under detta sju r lnga ramprogram att gra en slutlig bedmning av sm och medelstora fretags deltagande.
FP6 makes up a very small part (close to 5 %) of the overall funding provided for research in Europe and, hence, its scope for influence in a domain where Member States have the first role to play is by definition limited. 
Sjtte ramprogrammet utgr en mycket liten del (nra 5 procent) av de sammanlagda medlen som avstts fr forskning i EU, och ramprogrammets inflytandesfr p ett omrde dr medlemsstaterna har det frmsta ansvaret r begrnsad per definition.
Recommendation No 3 The Commission is constantly examining the research landscape, monitors the national R & D policies and is actively engaged in the endeavours to further research investments through, not least, the open method of coordination. 
Rekommendation nr 3 Kommissionen fljer konstant utvecklingen inom forskningsvrlden, vervakar den nationella politiken fr forskning och utveckling (FoU) och arbetar aktivt fr att f fram ytterligare forskningsinvesteringar, inte minst genom den ppna samordningsmetoden.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 65. 
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 65.
The Commission notes that the large number of projects under the new instruments, which points to the involvement of thousands of participants in them, as well as the overall good results that were registered for them, shows that any shortcomings have not been important for the overall use of the IPs and the NoEs. 
Kommissionen konstaterar att det stora antalet projekt i de nya instrumenten, med tusentals deltagare, samt de generellt sett goda resultat som har registrerats fr instrumenten, visar att eventuella brister inte har pverkat den vergripande anvndningen av de integrerade projekten och expertntverken i ngon hgre grad.
Recommendation No 4 The Commission agrees that clear and timely guidance, a speedier contracting process and better project monitoring are very important elements for the implementation of a European FP for research. 
Rekommendation nr 4 Kommissionen instmmer i att det r mycket viktigt fr genomfrandet av EU:s ramprogram fr forskning att se till att det finns tydliga riktlinjer tillgngliga i tid, att den tid det tar innan kontrakten skrivs under frkortas och att projektvervakningen frbttras.
The Commission carries out its obligations while it constantly has to balance between two goals that are difficult to reconcile, namely the speediness of disbursement of funds and the need to ensure their accountable distribution to contractors, all in the context of the current legislative environment. Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
Kommissionen fullgr sina skyldigheter samtidigt som den stndigt mste gra avvgningar mellan tv ml som r svra att frena, nmligen snabba utbetalningar av medel och behovet att garantera korrekt frdelning av medlen till parterna, inom den rttsliga ramen. Srskild rapport nr 8/2009 Đ Expertntverk och integrerade projekt i gemenskapens forskningspolitik Đ uppnddes mlen?
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union 2009 — 41 pp. — 21 􏰋 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-408-1 doi:10.2865/63596 REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 43 Special Report No 8/2009 — ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated Projects’ in Community research policy: did they achieve their objectives? 
Luxemburg: Europeiska unionens publikationsbyr 2009 Đ 41 s. Đ 21 x 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-422-7 doi:10.2865/68858 KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 43 Srskild rapport nr 8/2009 Đ Expertntverk och integrerade projekt i gemenskapens forskningspolitik Đ uppnddes mlen?
THE SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME WAS SET UP BY THE EU TO PROMOTE EUROPEAN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT DURING THE PERIOD FROM 2002 TO 2006. 
SJTTE RAMPROGRAMMET INRTTADES AV EU F R ATT FRMJA EUROPEISK FORSKNING OCH TEKNISK UTVECKLING UNDER PERIODEN 2002Đ2006.
THE COURT ANALYSED THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE TWO MAIN INSTRUMENTS, ‘NETWORKS OF EXCELLENCE’ AND ‘INTEGRATED PROJECTS’, HAD EFFECTIVELY CONTRIBUTED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAMME. 
REVISIONSRTTEN UNDERS KTE I VILKEN UTSTRCKNING DE TV HUVUDINSTRUMENTEN, EXPERTNTVERK OCH INTEGRERADE PROJEKT, P ETT NDAMLSENLIGT STT HADE BIDRAGIT TILL ATT PROGRAMMETS ML UPPNDDES.
THE COURT CONCLUDED THAT THESE INSTRUMENTS CONTRIBUTED TO THE GENERAL OBJECTIVE OF PROMOTING EFFECTIVE RESEARCH COLLABORATION BUT THEIR SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES WERE ONLY PARTIALLY ACHIEVED. 
REVISIONSRTTEN DROG SLUTSATSEN ATT INSTRUMENTEN HADE BIDRAGIT TILL DET ALLMNNA MLET ATT FRMJA NDAMLSENLIGT FORSKNINGSSAMARBETE MEN ATT DERAS SPECIFIKA ML ENDAST DELVIS HADE UPPNTTS.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS QJ-AB-09-010-EN-C 
EUROPEISKA REVISIONSRTTEN QJ-AB-09-010-SV-C
special report no 9 2009 THE EfficiEncy and EffEcTivEnEss of THE pErsonnEl sElEcTion acTiviTiEs carriEd ouT by THE EuropEan pErsonnEl sElEcTion officE (pursuant to article 248(4), second subparagraph, cE) EuropEan courT of audiTors EuropEan courT of audiTors 12, rue alcide de Gasperi 1615 luxembourg luXEMbourG Tel.: +352 4398-45410 fax: +352 4398-46410 Mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu special report no 9 2009 a great deal of additional information on the European union is available on the internet. it can be accessed through the europa server (http://europa.eu.int). cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. luxembourg : office for official publications of the European communities, 2009 isbn 92-000-0000-0 Š European communities, 2009 reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
ЕВРОПЕЙСКА СМЕТНА ПАЛАТА TRIBUNAL DE CUENTAS EUROPEO EVROPSKÝ ÚČETNÍ DVŮR DEN EUROPÆISKE REVISIONSRET EUROPÄISCHER RECHNUNGSHOF EUROOPA KONTROLLIKODA ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΟ ΕΛΕΓΚΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΝΕΔΡΙO EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS COUR DES COMPTES EUROPÉENNE CÚIRT INIÚCHÓIRÍ NA HEORPA CORTE DEI CONTI EUROPEA EIROPAS REVĪZIJAS PALĀTA EUROPOS AUDITO RŪMAI EURÓPAI SZÁMVEVŐSZÉK IL-QORTI EWROPEA TA’ L-AWDITURI EUROPESE REKENKAMER EUROPEJSKI TRYBUNAŁ OBRACHUNKOWY TRIBUNAL DE CONTAS EUROPEU CURTEA DE CONTURI EUROPEANĂ EURÓPSKY DVOR AUDÍTOROV EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE EUROOPAN TILINTARKASTUSTUOMIOISTUIN EUROPEISKA REVISIONSRÄTTEN Särskild rapport nr 9/2009 (i enlighet med artikel 248.4 andra stycket i EG-fördraget) Effektiviteten och ändamålsenligheten i den rekrytering som Europeiska rekryteringsbyrån utför samt Epsos svar 12, RUE ALCIDE DE GASPERI TELEPHONE (+352) 43 98 – 1 E-MAIL: euraud@eca.europa.eu L - 1615 LUXEMBOURG TELEFAX (+352) 43 93 42 INTERNET: http://eca.europa.eu
I. The European communitiesŐ institutions employ staff with a wide variety of professional backgrounds and geographical origins, mostly selected through open competitions which since 2003 have been managed by the European personnel selection office (Epso). 
SAMMANFATTNING I. Europeiska gemenskapernas institutioner anställer personal med mycket varierande yrkesbakgrund och geografiskt ursprung. De flesta rekryteras genom allmänna uttagningsprov som sedan 2003 anordnas av Europeiska rekryteringsbyrån (Epso).
The audit objective was to determine whether the personnel selection activities managed by Epso were efficient and effective. as far as it was relevant to the audit scope, the Epso development programme (Edp), adopted in september 2008, was taken into account. 
SyftetmedrevisionenvaratttaredapåhuruvidaEpsosrekryteringvar effektiv och ändamålsenlig. Epsos utvecklingsprogram (EDP), som antogs i september 2008, har beaktats i den mån som det har varit relevant för revisionens inriktning och omfattning.