natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Whereas the selection plan determines the number of holdings to be represented in the sample for each individual cell, the implementation report states the number of agricultural holdings actually selected. 
I urvalsplanen framgr fr varje enskild grupp hur mnga jordbruksfretag som skall vara representerade i stickprovet, medan det i rapporten om genomfrandet redogrs fr hur mnga jordbruksfretag som faktiskt valts ut.
An examination of the selection plans and implementation reports led to the following observations: (a) in one Member State, the sampling rate is the only criterion applied to determine sample size; there are no statistical data on the stratification of the holdings according to the Community typology (Greece). 
Vid granskningen av urvalsplanerna och rapporterna om genomfrande har fljande konstaterats: a) I en medlemsstat bestms stickprovets storlek endast utifrn stickprovsfrekvens, det fattas statistiska uppgifter om strati-fieringen av jordbruken enligt gemenskapstypologin (Grekland).
It is therefore not possible to evaluate the representativeness of the sample in the various regions; (b) in the same Member State, the selection plan was incomplete and had not been updated between 1983 and 1997, i.e. over a period of more than 14 years (Greece). 
Det gr allts inte att utvrdera stickprovets representativitet i de olika omrdena. b) I samma medlemsstat var urvalsplanen ofullstndig och hade inte frnyats mellan 1983 och 1997, det vill sga under mer n 14 r (Grekland).
Furthermore, this Member State did not draw up an implementation report for certain years and supplied incomplete reports for other years. 
Dessutom har denna medlemsstat vissa r inte upprttat ngon rapport om genomfrande och har andra r lmnat in ofullstndiga rapporter.
The selection plan of another Member State did not follow the Community typology concerning economic size and farming type (Netherlands); (6) Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC. 
En annan medlemsstats urvalsplan fljde inte gemenskapstypologin vad gller jordbrukens ekonomiska storlek och teknisk-ekonomiska inriktning (Nederlnderna), (6) Artikel 6.1 b i frordning (EEG) nr 79/65.
2. 20. 
20.2.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 45/7 c) Det r ibland stora skillnader mellan urvalsplanen och rapporten om genomfrande (Nederlnderna).
These differences show that the selection initially envisaged was not properly implemented, or that the implementation reports do not accurately reflect reality; (d) the Commission does not systematically make use of the selection and implementation reports. 
Dessa skillnader tyder p att det ursprungligen planerade urvalet hade genomfrts p ett bristflligt stt, eller p att rapporterna om genomfrande inte ger en korrekt bild av den faktiska situationen. d) Kommissionen anvnder inte urvalsplanerna och rapporterna om genomfrande p ett systematiskt stt.
It does not regularly examine the representativity of the samples and there is no systematic reconciliation between the selection and implementation reports. 
Kommissionen gr ingen regelbunden underskning av stickprovens representativitet och det grs ingen systematisk jmfrelse mellan urvalsplanerna och rapporterna om genomfrande.
According to the Commission, this comparison will be carried out automatically for the data concerning the financial year 2001, which will be available to the Commission at the end of 2003; (e) the Commission has never clarified the concept of the representativity of the sample. 
Enligt kommissionen kommer det att ske en automatisk jmfrelse fr uppgifterna om budgetret 2001 som kommer att vara tillgngliga fr kommissionen i slutet av 2003. e) Kommissionen har aldrig klargjort vad som menas med stickprovens representativitet.
The Member States rely on different indicators to assess representativity. 
Medlemsstaterna anvnder olika indikatorer fr att bedma representativiteten.
The application of the indicator mentioned in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 (1) (the relationship between the number of holdings in the sample and the number of holdings in the corresponding population cell) led to substantial differences in several Member States. 
Tillmpningen av den indikator som avses i bilaga II till frordning (EEG) nr 1859/82 (1) (frhllandet mellan antalet rapporterande fretag i stickprovet och antalet rapporterande fretag i motsvarande befolkningsgrupp) har lett till stora skillnader i flera medlemsstater.
The Commission took no steps to harmonise the approach. 
Kommissionen har inte vidtagit ngra tgrder fr att harmonisera arbetssttet.
Deadline for the transmission of farm returns 18. 
Tidsfrist fr verlmnande av fretagsredovisningar 18.
The liaison agencies forward the farm returns to the Commission no later than nine months after the end of the accounting year to which they relate (2). 
Samordningsorganen skall verlmna fretagsredovisningarna till kommissionen senast nio mnader efter utgngen av det rkenskapsr till vilket de hr (2).
A standard fee is paid by the Commission for each duly completed farm return that is forwarded to it within the period prescribed (132 euro in 2001 (3)). 
Ett standardarvode betalas av kommissionen fr varje vederbrligen genomfrd fretagsredovisning som verlmnas inom den faststllda tidsramen (132 euro r 2001 (3)).
In practice, there are considerable delays in the forwarding of data. In 1997, an average delay of 133 days was noted; this was 238 days in 1998 and 139 days in 1999. 
I praktiken lmnas fretagsredovisningarna in med stora frseningar. r 1997 verlmnades de i genomsnitt 133 dagar fr sent. r 1998 var genomsnittet 238 dagar och 1999 var det 139 dagar.
In one of the countries visited, the data was regularly transmitted with a delay of approximately a year (Greece). 
I ett av de lnder som beskts verlmnades uppgifterna som regel omkring ett r fr sent (Grekland).
It was therefore only possible to publish the results of the FADN for the financial year 1997-1998 in 2001, in the 1999 report on the situation of agriculture in the European Union, i.e. with a delay of approximately two years. 
Resultaten av ISJR fr rkenskapsret 1997Đ1998 kunde inte offentliggras frrn 2001, i rapporten fr 1999 om jordbrukslget i Europeiska unionen, det vill sga med omkring tv rs frdrjning.
The Commission has not penalised these delays by reducing the standard fee paid to the Member States concerned. 
Kommissionen har inte infrt ngon pfljd fr dessa frseningar i form av en snkning av standardarvodet till de berrda lnderna.
In July 2002, the Commission decided, in agreement with the Community Committee of the FADN, to have the period for the transmission of the data extended exceptionally from nine to (1) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 of 12 July 1982 concerning the selection of returning holdings for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings (OJ L 205, 13.7.1982, p. 5). 
I juli 2002 beslutade kommissionen i samfrstnd med ISJR:s gemenskapskommitt att tillflligt frlnga tidsfristen fr verlmning av uppgifterna frn 9 till 22 mnader fr 2000 och (1) Kommissionens frordning (EEG) nr 1859/82 av den 12 juli 1982 om val av rapporterande fretag fr faststllande av inkomstfrhllanden i jordbruksfretag (EGT L 205, 13.7.1982, s. 5).
(2) Article 3 paragraph 1 of Commission Regulation No 1915/83/EEC. 
(2) Artikel 3.1 i frordning (EEG) nr 1915/83.
(3) Commission Regulation (EC) No 368/2001 of 23 February 2001 fixing the standard fee per farm return for the 2001 accounting year of the Farm Accountancy Data Network (OJ L 55, 24.2.2001, p. 
(3) Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 368/2001 om faststllande av standardarvodet per fretagsredovisning fr rkenskapsret 2001 i samband med informationssystemet fr jordbruksfretagens redovisningsuppgifter (EGT L 55, 24.2.2001, s.
22 months for 2000 and 2001 (4). 
2001 (4).
However, this extension might have led to Member States transmitting the data for 2002 before those for 2001, which would have caused administrative problems. 
Denna ytterligare frsening hade dock kunnat leda till att medlemsstaterna lmnade in uppgifterna fr 2002 fre uppgifterna fr 2001, vilket skulle ha orsakat problem i frvaltningen.
The transmission period for the data concerning the 2002 accounting year was therefore extended, in turn, from nine to 15 months (5). 
Perioden fr verlmnande av uppgifter fr budgetret 2002 frlngdes allts i sin tur frn nio till femton mnader (5).
Verification of the data contained in the farm returns 21. 
Granskning av uppgifterna i fretagsredovisningarna 21.
The liaison agencies are required to collect the farm returns sent in by the accountancy offices and verify that they have been duly completed (6). 
Samordningsorganen skall bland annat sammanstlla de fretagsredovisningar som de fr av bokfringsbyrerna och kontrollera att de r vederbrligen ifyllda (6).
A farm return is duly completed where its contents are factually accurate and the accountancy data given comply with the relevant Community provisions (7). 
En fretagsredovisning r vederbrligen ifylld nr dess innehll r sakligt riktigt och de redovisningsuppgifter som den innehller verensstmmer med gemenskapens bestmmelser p omrdet (7).
Until 2001 (data concerning the 1999 accounting year), the Commission itself checked the consistency of the data forwarded by the Member States. 
Fram till 2001 (uppgifter fr budgetret 1999) kontrollerade kommissionen sjlv att de uppgifter som verlmnades av medlemsstaterna var samstmmiga.
Amongst other things, the CommissionŐs software checked whether the data contained in the farm returns were consistent and whether certain maximum and minimum thresholds had been complied with. 
Genom kommissionens dataprogram kontrollerades bland annat om uppgifterna i fretagsredovisningarna var samstmmiga och om vissa maximi-och mini-mitrsklar hade respekterats.
The Commission reported any errors to the liaison agencies. 
Kommissionen meddelade eventuella fel till samordningsorganen.
It was the responsibility of these agencies to analyse the errors found, rectify them and forward the corrected data to the Commission. 
Samordningsorganen var lagda att analysera de fel som konstaterats, tgrda dem och lmna de rttade uppgifterna till kommissionen.
As the Commission only pays for farm returns which are completely free of errors, it was in the liaison agenciesŐ interest to carry out the necessary corrections and send the corrected farm returns to the Commission. 
Eftersom kommissionen endast betalar ut ersttningar fr felfria fretagsredovisningar lg det i samordningsorganens intresse att se till att ndvndiga ndringar gjordes och att de rttade fretagsredovisningarna lmnades till kommissionen.
Under the new system for collecting and checking the data (FADN-1), the Member States carry out checks themselves with the help of programmes provided by the Commission. 
I det nya systemet fr insamling och kontroll av uppgifterna (ISJRĐ1) utfr medlemsstaterna sjlva kontrollerna genom de dataprogram som kommissionen stller till frfogande.
The aim of the audit carried out in the Member States visited was to examine a sample of the errors reported by the Commission in order to establish the cause of the errors and ascertain that they had been corrected. 
Mlet med den granskning som genomfrts i medlemsstaterna var att p grundval av ett antal fel som konstaterats av kommissionen avgra hur felen har kunnat uppst och se till att de rttas till.
As none of the Member States visited kept records of the reasons for the corrections made, it was not always possible to achieve this objective. 
Eftersom ingen av de granskade medlemsstaterna har dokumenterat de orsaker som motiverar en rttelse, har det inte alltid varit mjligt att n detta ml.
In one Member State, where the national sample is much larger than required by the Community provisions, farm returns with errors are simply replaced with correct returns, but the errors are not rectified (Germany). 
I en medlemsstat dr de nationella stickproven r viktigare n de som freskrivs i gemenskapens bestmmelser har de felaktiga fretagsredovisningarna helt enkelt ersatts med andra korrekta redovisningar, men felen har inte rttats till (Tyskland).
Not all the Member States visited made use of the opportunities for cross-checking against other databases, for (4) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1251/2002 of 11 July 2002 (OJ L 183, 12.7.2002, p. 
Alla de granskade medlemsstaterna utnyttjar inte mjligheterna att dubbelkontrollera mot andra (4) Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 1251/2002 av den 11 juli 2002 (EGT L 183, 12.7.2002, s.
(5) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1409/2003 of 7 August 2003 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83 on certain detailed implementing rules concerning the keeping of accounts for the purpose of determining the incomes of agricultural holdings (OJ L 201, 8.8.2003, p. 
(5) Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 1409/2003 av den 7 augusti 2003 om undantag frn frordning (EEG) nr 1915/83 om vissa tillmpningsfreskrifter som rr redovisning fr faststllande av inkomster i jordbruksfretag (EUT L 201, 8.8.2003, s.
(6) Article 6(1)(d) of Regulation No 79/65/EEC. 
(6) Artikel 6.1 d i frordning (EEG) nr 79/65.
(7) Article 4 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1915/83. 
(7) Artikel 4 i frordning (EEG) nr 1915/83.
C 45/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 example the IACS (1) (Germany). 
C 45/8 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 databaser, framfr allt IACS (1) (Tyskland).
A number of Member States do carry out such cross-checks with the aim of limiting, as far as possible, the risk of error but the Commission does not organise any opportunities for an exchange of information concerning the experience gained in this area. 
Vissa medlemsstater gr verkligen sdana kontroller fr att minimera riskerna fr fel, men kommissionen organiserar inte ngot erfarenhetsutbyte p omrdet.
Agricultural holdings organised as corporations 24. 
Nr jordbruksfretagen r lagenligt bildade bolag 24.
This indicator shows profit after deduction of interest, farm rent and labour costs. 
Denna indikator motsvarar vinsten efter rnteavdrag och betalning av arrende och arbetskostnad.
For the farmer and his family, this represents their return on land use, capital and labour. 
Fr jordbrukaren och jordbrukarens familj utgrs den av inkomster av kapital, arbete och jordbruk.
However, this indicator cannot be applied to legal entities, as it does not take into account the incomes of investors and those employed in agriculture (2). 
Denna indikator gller dock inte fr juridiska personer eftersom kapitalgares liksom jordbruksanstlldas inkomster inte beaktas (2).
Holdings organised as companies would not represent a major problem if there were only a few of them. 
Jordbruksfretag i bolagsform skulle inte utgra ngot strre problem om det endast fanns ett ftal.
But, actually, in two of the six Member States their role is by no means insignificant. 
Men i sjlva verket spelar de en icke frsumbar roll i tv av de sex medlemsstater som har beskts.
In France, since the 1970s, the Government has created three types of company specially designed for the agricultural sector: the Ôgroupement agricole dŐexploitation en communŐ (GAEC), the Ôentreprise agricole  responsabilit limiteŐ (EARL) and the Ôsocit civile dŐexploitation agricoleŐ. 
I Frankrike har staten sedan sjuttiotalet skapat tre slags bolag som r srskilt utformade fr jordbrukssektorn: jord-brukssammanslutning fr gemensam drift (groupement agricole dŐexploitation en commun Đ GAEC), jordbruksfretag med begrnsat ansvar (entreprise agricole  responsabilit limite Đ EARL) och ekonomisk frening fr jordbruksfretag (socit civile dŐexploitation agricole).
The number of these companies increased from 3 % of agricultural holdings in 1979 to 17 % in 2000 (3) and they accounted for 40 % of French agricultural production for 2000 (4). 
Dessa bolag har kat i antal frn 3 % 1979 till 17 % 2000 (3) och de stod fr omkring 40 % av den franska jordbruksproduktionen 2000 (4).
A similar situation exists in the new Lnder in Germany. 
Samma sak gller i de nya delstaterna i Tyskland.
Many of the former agricultural cooperatives (Landwirtschaftliche Produktionsgenossenschaften) have been transformed into legal entities. 
De tidigare jordbrukskooperativen (Landwirtschaftliche Produktionsge-nossenschaft) har ofta ombildats till juridiska personer.
The structure of these holdings (which are legal entities under private law and, in 2001, had an average agricultural area of 931,7 ha (5)) is fundamentally different from that of the traditional private holdings, whose average agricultural area is 27,9 ha. 
Strukturen i dessa jordbruk i form av privatrttsliga juridiska personer, som 2001 omfattade i genomsnitt 931,7 ha (5) av den utnyttjade jordbruksarealen (UJA), r helt olik den i de traditionella enskilda fretagen som i genomsnitt omfattar 27,9 ha utnyttjad jordbruksareal.
It is not very meaningful to compare the profit of a limited company, after deduction of staff expenditure, with the income (1) Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 of 27 November 1992 establishing an integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes (OJ L 355, 5.12.1992, p. 
Att jmfra ett bolags vinst efter avdrag fr personalkostnader med en enskild jordbrukares inkomst r av ringa intresse. (1) Rdets frordning (EEG) nr 3508/92 av den 27 november 1992 om ett integrerat system fr administration och kontroll av vissa stdsystem inom gemenskapen (EGT, L 355, 5.12.1992, s.
(2) In the case of holdings organised as corporations, the only two meaningful indicators are Ôfarm net added valueŐ or Ôfarm gross added valueŐ, which are less meaningful in this context as far as the level of income is concerned. 
(2) Fr jordbruksfretag i bolagsform r allts de enda tv betydelsefulla indikatorerna fr ISJR jordbrukets bruttofrdlingsvrde och jordbrukets nettofrdlingsvrde, som i detta fall r mindre intressant fr inkomstnivn.
(3) If we take into account the FADN field of observation (professional holdings), the ÔStructuresŐ survey in France gave for 1997 25,4 % of holdings as being registered as companies. 
(3) Sett endast till ISJR:s underskningsomrde (professionella jordbruk) visade underskningen ÓStructuresÓ i Frankrike att jordbruksfretagen i bolagsform 1997 stod fr en andel p 25,4 %.
(4) European Commission, Directorate-General Agriculture, Summary Report on the 141st FADN committee meeting in Midi-Pyrnes, VI. 
(4) Europeiska kommissionen, generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk, sammanfattande rapport om det 141:e mtet i ISJR:s kommitt i Midi-Pyrnes, VI.
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Agreste Primeur No 93-June 2001. 
2, Jordbruks-och fiskeministeriet, Agreste Pri-meur, nummer 93Đjuni 2001.
(5) German Federal Ministry of Consumer Protection, Food and Agriculture, summary of the report by the Federal Government on food and agricultural policy 2002, Berlin, 2002, Table 8, p. 
(5) Tyska frbundsministeriet fr konsumentskydd, livsmedel och jordbruk, rapport frn frbundsregeringen om livsmedels-och jordbrukspolitiken 2002, Berlin, 2002, tabell 8, s.12.
Nevertheless, the FADN remains wholly designed for traditional family holdings and does not provide any separate indicator for farms organised as companies. 
ISJR r dock fortfarande helt anpassat efter de traditionella famil-jejordbruken och ger ingen srskild indikator fr jordbruksfretag i bolagsform.
Provision has been made for differentiation between farm holdings on the basis of their legal status in the data for the 2002 financial year, which will be available in 2004. 
Med uppgifterna fr budgetret 2002, som kommer att vara tillgngliga 2004, skall det bli mjligt att skilja mellan jordbruksfretag med olika rttslig stllning.
The Economic Accounts for Agriculture (EAA) Legal basis and concept 28. 
Rkenskaper fr jordbruket (Economic Accounts for agriculture, EAA) Rttslig grund och begrepp 28.
The EAA are drawn up within the framework of the European System of Integrated Economic Accounts (ESA) with the aim of providing comparable, up-to-date and reliable information on the economic situation of the agricultural sector and, more particularly, on the development of agricultural incomes (6). 
Rkenskaperna fr jordbruket (EAA) upprttades inom ramen fr Europasystemet fr integrerad ekonomisk redovisning (ENS) fr att ta fram jmfrbara, aktuella och tillfrlitliga uppgifter om den ekonomiska situationen fr jordbruket, och i synnerhet om utvecklingen av jordbruksinkomsterna (6).
They have been published by Eurostat since 1964. 
De offentliggrs av Eurostat sedan 1964.
The aim of the EAA is to evaluate agricultural production and related costs. 
Mlet med rkenskaperna fr jordbruket r att utvrdera jordbruksproduktionen och kostnaderna fr den.
The point of departure is the farm holding and the entire agricultural production resulting from a full-time or part-time agricultural activity, which is defined on the basis of a list of activities. 
Utgngspunkten r jordbruksfretaget och den totala jordbruksproduktionen vid jordbruk som drivs som huvudsaklig verksamhet eller sekundr verksamhet, bedmt utifrn en frteckning ver verksamheter.
These activities are nevertheless included in the value of production if it is impossible to distinguish them from the main agricultural activity. 30. 
Dessa verksamheter ingr dock i produktionsvrdet om det r omjligt att skilja dem frn den huvudsakliga jordbruksverksamheten 30.
The EAA are still based at present on a gentlemenŐs agreement, according to which the Member States have undertaken to comply with the concepts and rules of a common methodology for drawing up the EAA and a timetable for forwarding the data. 
Rkenskaperna fr jordbruket bygger n i dag p en uppgrelse i godo dr medlemsstaterna har frbundit sig att respektera de begrepp och bestmmelser som faststlls inom ramen fr en gemensam metod gllande upprttandet av rkenskaperna fr jordbruket, samt en tidsram fr verlmnande av uppgifterna.
In February 2003, the Commission submitted a proposal for a Regulation concerning the economic accounts for agriculture to the European Parliament and the Council (7). 
I februari 2003 lade kommissionen fram ett frslag till frordning om rkenskaper fr jordbruket fr Europaparlamentet och rdet (7).
This proposal, which is currently passing through the parliamentary legislative procedure, is mostly based on the methodology which has been applied so far. 
Detta frslag, som i dagslget gr igenom det parlamentariska lagstiftningsfrfarandet, grundas i huvudsak p den metod som har anvnts hittills.
The production value is calculated by multiplying the quantities by the relevant prices. 
Genom att multiplicera kvantiteterna med motsvarande priser kan man berkna produktionens vrde.
The values are provided by the statistics offices or ministries of the Member States on the basis of national statistics for each branch. 
Vrdena meddelas av medlemsstaternas statistikkontor eller ministerier baserat p nationell statistik per bransch.
Where statistics for the sectors are not available, other sources are used; for example, FADN statistics for previous years may be extrapolated. 
Om det saknas statistik uppdelat p branscher anvnds andra kllor, till exempel kan man extrapolera resultaten av ISJR frn tidigare r.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the EAA and the indicators derived from them. 
I figur 2 ges en versikt ver EAA och de indikatorer som baseras p dem.
(6) Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the economic accounts for agriculture in the Community, Brussels, 4 February 2003, COM(2003) 50 final, first preamble. 
(6) Frslag till Europaparlamentets och rdets frordning om rkenskaper fr jordbruket i gemenskapen, Bryssel, 4 februari 2003, KOM(2003) 50 slutlig, skl 1.