natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Subsidiarity was introduced into Community policy by Article 2 of the Maastricht Treaty, which provides that the principle applies as defined in Article 5 of the EC Treaty (Treaty of (1) Evaluation of agri-environment programmes, DG Agriculture Working Document VI/7655/98. Rome). This latter Article limits application of the principle of subsidiarity to the decision-making process outside areas of exclusive Community competence. 
Subsidiariteten infrdes i gemenskapspolitiken genom artikel 2 i Maastrichtfrdraget dr det anges att principen skall till-lmpas enligt vad som sgs i artikel 5 i frdraget om upprttandet av Europeiska gemenskapen (Romfrdraget). I den sistnmnda (1) En utvrdering av miljprogrammen fr jordbruket, GD Jordbruk arbetsdokument VI/7655/98. artikeln begrnsas tillmpningen av subsidiaritetsprincipen till beslutsfattande p omrden dr gemenskapen inte r ensam beh-rig.
The common agricultural policy, of which the accompanying measures and especially the agri-environment measure are an integral part, is an exclusive Community competence. 
Den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, dr de kompletterande tgrderna och srskilt miljtgrderna ingr som en integrerad del, r ett omrde dr gemenskapen har ensam behrighet.
Nevertheless, the Court is correct in pointing out that the management system introduced by the accompanying measures was innovative. 
Revisionsrtten har dock rtt i sitt ppekande att det frvaltningssystem som infrdes genom de kompletterande tgrderna var nyskapande.
The innovation was in establishing a decentralised approach to the implementation of a Community obligation. 
Nyheten lg i att ett decentraliserat tillvgagngsstt utnyttjades fr att genomfra en gemenskapsskyldighet.
In the case of the Agri-environment Regulation, Member States were required to implement the measures throughout their territory according to their needs. 
Nr det gllde frordningen om miljtgrder fr jordbruket skulle medlemsstaterna genomfra tgrderna inom hela sitt omrde i enlighet med sina behov.
This was a decision of the Council, and no Member State or region had the authority to alter the terms of this basic obligation on the grounds of subsidiarity. 
Detta var rdets beslut och ingen medlemsstat eller region hade behrighet att p basis av subsidiaritet ndra villkoren i denna grundlggande skyldighet.
It should be emphasised that the EAP obligation of 15 % of EU farmland under management agreement, cited by the Court, is the only obligation exclusively attributable to the CAP — and the only one which has been fully achieved. 
Det br betonas att den skyldighet enligt miljprogrammen fr jordbruket att ing frvaltningsavtal fr 15 % av gemenskapens jordbruksmark som revisionsrtten nmner r den enda skyldighet som uteslutande kan tillskrivas den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, och den enda som har uppntts helt och hllet.
The Court mentions that coverage alone is no guarantee of significant impact, which point was highlighted by the Commission in the 1998 working document at Section 18.3. 
Revisionsrtten nmner att enbart tckningen inte r ngon garanti fr betydande effekt vilket ocks kommissionen understryker i avsnitt 18.3 i 1998 rs arbetsdokument.
Planning Commission planning Under the guarantee system, money was only allocated to the budget for programmes which had been approved. 
Planering Kommissionens planering Enligt garantisystemet tilldelades medel endast till budgeten fr program som hade godknts.
Approval of programmes was made exclusively on the basis of the criteria in Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 and these did not include assuring an even geographical spread of expenditure. 
Programmen godkndes uteslutande p basis av kriterierna i frordning (EEG) nr 2078/92 och dessa kriterier inkluderade inte att en jmn geografisk spridning av utgifterna skulle skerstllas.
The Commission can categorically state that no programme was ever refused on the grounds of lack of resources, while programmes were refused on the grounds of incompatibility with Regulation (EEC) No 2078/ 92. 
Kommissionen kan kategoriskt pst att inget program ngonsin avslogs p grund av bristande medel, medan dremot program avslogs fr att de inte uppfyllde kraven i frordning (EEG) nr 2078/92.
The question of budgetary consideration and Member State influence on the extent of programmes was discussed in more length in the 1998 working document at Section 18.1.3. 
Frgan om budgethnsyn och medlemsstaternas inflytande p programmens omfattning analyseras mer i detalj i avsnitt 18.1.3 i 1998 rs arbetsdokument.
The Commission emphasises that these measures are to a large extent the competence of the Member States under the decentralised system of programme management specified in the legal texts. 
Kommissionen vill understryka att dessa tgrder i stor utstrckning r medlemsstaternas behrighet inom ramen fr det decentraliserade system fr programfrvaltning som beskrivs i lagtexterna.
Furthermore, these measures are co-financed by the Community, which inevitably means that the allocation of Community funds will to a great extent depend on Member State and regional priorities and environmental ambitions. 
Dessutom samfinansieras dessa tgrder av gemenskapen vilket oundgngligen innebr att tilldelningen av gemenskapsmedel i stor utstrckning beror p medlemsstatens nationella och regionala prioriteringar samt miljambitioner.
8.12.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 353/47 In the cases cited of Member States with disproportionately low expenditure (Spain and Greece) the Commission made efforts to encourage programme adoption in both. 
8.12.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 353/47 I de omnmnda fallen med medlemsstater med oproportionerligt lga utgifter (Spanien och Grekland) som nmns i rapporten gjorde kommissionen anstrngningar att stimulera antagande av program i bda dessa lnder.
However, there are many valid reasons for developing programmes at a slow rate, in particular administrative and control capacity. 
Det finns dock mnga giltiga skl till att utveckla program i lngsam takt och i synnerhet administrativ och kontrollkapacitet.
In the case of the new Member States, favourable elements for widespread application were in place: existing experience; environmental awareness among farmers and the public; sense of political priority; and trained extension services. 
Nr det gller de nya medlemsstaterna fanns positiva faktorer redan p plats som frmjade en bred till-lmpning, nmligen befintlig erfarenhet, miljmedvetenhet bland jordbrukare och hos allmnheten, knsla av politisk prioritet och tjnstemn utbildade i extensiv odling.
The Commission underlines the limitations of targeting funds to ameliorating ‘environmentally damaging intensive practices’, where this would be in contradiction with the ‘polluter-pays principle’. 
Kommissionen understryker att mlinriktade medel skall begrnsas till att frbttra Óintensiva metoder som r skadliga ur miljsynpunktÓ nr detta strider mot principen frorenaren betalar.
Partly in the light of experience gained in the operation of the agri-environment measure, the Commission has formed the view that farmers should not be paid under the agri-environment programmes to reach the standard of ‘usual good agricultural practice’. 
Det r delvis mot bakgrund av den erfarenhet som vunnits inom ramen fr miljprogrammen fr jordbruket som kommissionen har ntt fram till stndpunkten att jordbrukare inte br betalas inom miljprogrammen fr jordbruket fr att uppn nivn fr normal tillmpning av god jordbrukarsed.
This comprises at least adherence to compulsory law and the standards a ‘reasonable farmer’ would follow in the region concerned. 
Detta omfattar tminstone att tvingande lagar fljs liksom den praxis en normal jordbrukare skulle flja i den berrda regionen.
This standard is not fixed and will change over time, nor are codes of good agricultural practice developed in all regions for all sectors. 
Denna norm r inte fast och kommer att frndras ver tiden, och inte heller utvecklas ngon kodex fr god jordbrukspraxis i alla regioner fr alla sektorer.
The Commission believes that ‘usual good practice’ is the only sound and coherent basis on which to develop agri-environment programmes and has enshrined this ‘baseline stan-dard’ into the agri-environment chapter of the Rural Development Regulation. 
Kommissonen anser att normal tillmpning av god jordbrukarsed r den enda sunda och enhetliga bas p vilken miljprogram fr jordbruket kan byggas och har lagt fast denna utgngsstandard i kapitlet om miljvnligt jordbruk i frordningen om std till utveckling av landsbygden.
The Commission accepts that implementation had been too low in some Member States. 
Kommissionen accepterar att genomfrandet har varit alltfr svagt i vissa medlemsstater.
The main reason no programme has been developed to target greenhouse gas emissions is that the most obvious measure would be to cease inefficient extensive livestock grazing in favour of efficient intensive systems. 
Den frmsta orsaken till att inga program har utarbetats fr att minska utslpp av vxthusgaser r att den mest naturliga tgrden vore att upphra med ineffektivt extensivt bete fr boskap till frmn fr effektiva intensiva system.
The greenhouse gas emissions per unit of output (meat, milk) are up to 50 % higher with an extensive system than with an intensive system. 
Utslppen av vxthusgaser per produktionsenhet (ktt, mjlk) r upp till 50 % hgre i ett extensivt system n i ett intensivt system.
The main thrust of agri-environment programmes has been to preserve extensive systems and prevent the damage of abandonment and at least not encourage the intensification of livestock keeping, notwithstanding the reduced emissions. 
Huvudinriktningen i miljprogrammen fr jordbruket har varit att bevara extensiva system och frhindra den skada som nedlggning av jordbruk fr med sig och tminstone inte stimulera till en intensifiering av boskapsuppfdningen, trots de mindre utslppen inom denna produktionsform.
The Commission disputes that there was no analysis of the EU’s most important environmental needs: the various environmental action programmes, notably the fifth EAP, fill this role. 
Kommissionen invnder mot pstendet att det inte fanns ngon analys av vilka de viktigaste miljbehoven i EU var. De olika tgrdsprogrammen fr miljn och srskilt det femte tgrdsprogrammet fyller denna roll.
The Commission accepts that insufficient needs analysis was carried out to identify the role for agri-environment programmes (see also 1998 working document Chapter 18). 
Kommissionen accepterar att otillrckliga behovsanalyser genomfrdes fr att identifiera miljprogrammens roll (se ocks kapitel 18 i 1998 rs arbetsdokument).
However, in order to ensure compatibility with the ‘polluter-pays principle’ some of Europe’s most pressing environmental concerns, such as the nitrate pollution resulting from farming methods which are not in accordance with good agricultural practice, should be addressed by compulsory environmental restrictions, (for example those foreseen in the Community’s Nitrate Directive), rather than by voluntary agri-environmental programmes. 
Fr att garantera frenlighet med principen frorenaren betalar br vissa av Europas mest akuta problem, som nitratfroreningar som beror p jordbruksmetoder som inte r frenliga med god jordbrukspraxis snarare omfattas av tvingande miljrestriktioner (till exempel de som freskrivs i gemenskapens nitratdirektiv) n av frivilliga jordbruksmiljprogram.
While accepting the Court’s point, the innovative nature of the agri-environment instrument meant that many of the difficulties which were addressed by the implementing regulation (Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/96) could only be identified after a year or two of implementation. 
Samtidigt som kommissionen godtar revisionsrttens synpunkt kan noteras att de nyskapande inslagen i miljinstrumentet fr jordbruket innebar att mnga av de svrigheter som lstes genom kommissionens tillmpningsfrordning (frordning (EG) nr 746/96) inte kunde konstateras frrn efter ett eller tv rs genomfrande.
Running programmes were adapted to its provisions. 
Pgende program anpassades till bestmmelserna i denna frordning.
The Commission can state with some certainty that its provisions were largely successful since most of the problems addressed in Regulation (EC) No 746/96 were wholly resolved by it. 
Kommissionen kan med tmligen stor skerhet konstatera att bestmmelserna till vervgande del var framgngsrika eftersom de flesta av de problem som togs upp i frordning (EG) nr 746/96 till fullo lstes genom den.
48 to 50. in Commission departments which, unfortunately, is not limited to the policy area covered by this report. 
Revisionsrtten belyser problemet med den personalbrist som rder inom kommissionen och som olyckligtvis inte begrnsar sig till det politikomrde som rapporten behandlar.
Due to this general situation, it was not possible to recruit more staff to the EA and AF units. 
P grund av denna generella situation var det inte mjligt att rekrytera mer personal till enheten fr miljprogram fr jordbruket eller enheten fr beskogningsprogrammet.
However, it is the Commission’s view that despite this situation, the work of programme approval was competently carried out and has contributed to a generally successful, although not perfect, implementation of the two Regulations. 
Kommissionen anser nd att arbetet fr godknnande av programmen trots denna situation har genomfrts p ett kompetent stt och har bidragit till ett i allmnhet framgngsrikt, om n inte perfekt, genomfrande av de tv frordningarna.
However, the Commission would like to emphasise the contribution of the detached national experts, many of whom have had environmental and agronomic qualifications. 
Kommissionen vill dock rikta uppmrksamheten p de bidrag som de avdelade nationella experterna givit, av vilka mnga hade miljutbildning och yrkesutbildning i agronomi.
The Commission in 1999 reorganised the directorates in Directorate-General Agriculture dealing with rural development, including the creation of a coordination unit to ensure a coherent programme approval procedure. 
1999 omorganiserade kommissionen de direktorat i Generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk som sysslar med landsbygdsutveckling, inklusive inrttandet av en samordningsenhet fr att skerstlla ett konsekvent frfarande fr godknnande av programmen.
As stated by the Court, the workload on the Commission staff for dealing with the new programmes is very substantial. 
Som revisionsrtten ppekar r kommissionens arbetsbelastning fr att hantera de nya programmen mycket stor.
The problem of delays in filling vacancies will be addressed in the general restructuring of the Commission recently launched by the College. 
Problemen med frseningar nr det gller att fylla lediga tjnster kommer att tas upp inom ramen fr den allmnna omstrukturering av kommissionens avdelningar som kommissionen nyligen har inlett.
Concerning targeting of programmes, the Commission underlines that agri-environment measures are often not suited to addressing the activities which are ‘most damaging to the environment’ — since the farmer should often bear the cost of stopping the damage according to the ‘polluter-pays principle.’ The Court highlights the problem of shortage of staff 
Nr det gller programmens mlinriktning betonar kommissionen att miljtgrder fr jordbruket ofta inte r lmpliga fr att komma till rtta med de verksamheter som Ór mest skadliga fr miljnÓ, eftersom jordbrukaren ofta br betala kostnaderna fr att avhjlpa skadan enligt principen frorenaren betalar.
C 353/48 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.12.2000 Reply to text box 1 GERMANY North Rhine-Westphalia In Germany, the Länder are responsible for environmental policy including agri-environment. 
C 353/48 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.12.2000 Svar till textruta 1 TYSKLAND Nordrhein-Westfalen I Tyskland ansvarar delstaterna fr miljpolitiken inklusive jordbruket.
Apart from Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 there are other means to achieve environmental benefits in rural areas. 
Frnsett bestmmelserna i frordning (EEG) nr 2078/92 finns det andra stt att uppn miljvinster i landsbygdsomrden.
The low uptake of EU funding which the Court of Auditors found in North Rhine-Westphalia in comparison to the region’s total farmland reflects this circumstance and might also be a reflection of the region’s own financial resources. 
Det lga utnyttjande av gemenskapsmedel som revisionsrtten konstaterat i denna delstat jmfrt med regionens totala jordbruksmark speglar detta frhllande och kan ocks vara en fljd av regionens egna finansiella resurser.
The low uptake of EU funding in North Rhine-Westphalia was however at no time connected with higher expenditure by other regions. 
Det lga utnyttjandet av gemenskapsmedel i Nordrhein-Westfalen var dock inte vid ngot tillflle knutet till hgre utnyttjande i andra regioner.
Saxony The AE programme of Saxony included a specific measure addressing nitrogen input involving a 20 % voluntary reduction of N-fertiliser. 
Sachsen Miljprogrammet fr jordbruket i Sachsen innehll en srskild tgrd fr att komma tillrtta med nitrogenfrorening som inbegriper 20 % frivillig minskning av gdningsmnen som innehller nitrogen.
First evaluations of this measure showed a significant reduction of nitrate concentrations in soil. 
De frsta utvrderingarna av denna tgrd visade en betydande minskning av nitratkoncentrationer i marken.
A corresponding significant reduction of nitrate concentrations in the water has not, however, been shown yet. 
En motsvarande (lika stor) minskning av nitratkoncentrationer i vattnet kunde dock nnu inte pvisas.
The area covered by the specific measure was nearly 140 000 hectares in 1996/1997 and was increasing. 
Det omrde som omfattades av den srskilda tgrden inkluderade 1996/1997 nstan 140 000 ha och var kande.
The ecological problems quoted by the Court of Auditors (soil erosion) were addressed by measures within the Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 programme (for example mulch seeding) as well as by measures outside the programme. 
De ekologiska problem som revisionsrtten nmner (markerosion) bemttes genom tgrder inom ramen fr program enligt frordning (EEG) nr 2078/92 (t.ex. marktckning) liksom genom tgrder utanfr programmet.
The Commission would hesitate to impose its own view of the correct interpretation of setting priorities in the application of aid schemes in Saxony or in any other region — in the manner suggested by the Court. 
Kommissionen skulle tveka att p det stt som fresls av revisionsrtten ptvinga sin egen sikt om korrekt tolkning av faststllande av prioriteringar nr det gller tillmpning av stdsystem i Sachsen eller i ngon annan region.
Bavaria Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 allows Member States to set up measures which ‘may include aid for farmers who maintain extensive production methods introduced in the past’. 
Bayern Enligt artikel 2 i frordning (EEG) nr 2078/92 fr medlemsstaterna inrtta tgrder som Ófr omfatta std till jordbrukare som frbinder sig att bibehlla extensiva produktionsmetoder som infrts tidigareÓ.
The question whether in fact farmers would continue with environmentally beneficial farming practices without receiving financial aid has to be answered within the following context: 1. 
Frgan om jordbrukare faktiskt skulle fortstta med jordbruksmetoder som ger positiva effekter p miljn utan att erhlla ekonomiskt std mste besvaras inom fljande sammanhang: 1.
How representative are those statements? 
Hur representativa r dessa pstenden ?
How relevant are these statements considering a long-term period (sustainable farming)? 
Hur relevanta r dessa pstenden i ett lngsiktigt perspektiv (ex.vis hllbart jordbruk)?
The Bavarian programme has recently increased the requirements of environmentally beneficial farming practices for the basic premium. 
I det bayerska programmet har nyligen kraven p jordbruksmetoder som ger positiva effekter p miljn hjts vad avser grundstdet.
As a result, 30 000 farmers quit the measures. 
Som ett resultat av detta lmnade 30 000 jordbrukare tgrderna.
In addition, KULAP A as amended in late 1997 increased the number of more targeted measures and as a result a significant amount was allocated to more targeted measures. 
KULAP A, ndrat i slutet av 1997, kade dessutom antalet mer mlinriktade tgrder, vilket ledde till att ett betydande belopp tilldelades riktade tgrder.
Baden-Württemberg The Regulation expressly permits horizontal programmes containing one or more of the measures available as well as the zonal programmes. 
Baden-Wrttemberg I frordningen tillts uttryckligen vergripande program som innehller en eller flera av de tillgngliga tgrderna liksom de omrdesbaserade programmen.
In fact, the MEKA programme includes in addition to the horizontal measures many targeted measures, focused on one type of biotope or delimited zones. 
MEKA-programmet innehller i sjlva verket i tillgg till de vergripande tgrderna mnga riktade tgrder som avser en viss typ av biotop eller avgrnsade omrden.
FRANCE Even if an allocation of funds between regions according to environmental priorities appears to be desirable, it must be noted that Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 did not foresee any mandatory allocation key. 
FRANKRIKE ven om en frdelning av medel mellan regioner enligt miljprioriteringar kan tyckas vara nskvrd, mste framhllas att frordning (EEG) nr 2078/92 inte innehller ngon obligatorisk frdelningsnyckel.
However, the Commission can agree to the idea that the development of aid allocation methods by Member States can contribute to securing a more efficient use of EU funds. 
Kommissionen kan dock hlla med om att en utformning av metoder fr stdutbetalning i medlemsstaterna kan bidra till att garantera ett mer effektivt utnyttjande av EU-medel.
For instance, it is not possible to compare the environmental consequences of the pig industry in Brittany, which is highly publicised, with the abandonment of thousands of hectares in Auvergne. 
Det r exempelvis inte mjligt att jmfra miljkonsekvenserna av svinindustrin i Bretagne, som r mycket omskriven, med nedlggning av tusentals hektar jordbruksmark i Auvergne.
Lastly, some environmental difficulties partly result from a bad application of mandatory requirements and should not be addressed through additional money under agri-environment schemes. 
8.12.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 353/49 Slutligen kan sgas att vissa miljproblem delvis r ett resultat av dlig tillmpning av obligatoriska krav och drfr inte br lsas genom tilldelning av ytterligare medel frn miljprogrammen.
In the example of the pig industry in Brittany, agri-environment should not compensate for the inadequate application of the Nitrate Directive in this region. 
I det ovannmnda exemplet med svinindustrin i Bretagne, br inte miljprogrammen fr jordbruket kompensera den bristflliga tillmpningen av nitratdirektivet i denna region.
ITALY Agri-environmental programmes have had a different uptake, not least due to their innovative nature and to the complexity of their administration: the classical pattern of innovation (early adopters, advance majority) or learning curve was followed in Italy. 
ITALIEN Miljprogram fr jordbruket har utnyttjats olika i olika lnder vilket inte minst beror p deras innovativa art och den komplicerade administrationen av dessa program. Det klassiska mnstret fr nyskapande (de som brjar tidigt gr snabbare framt n vriga) eller inlrningskurva fljdes i Italien.
The original estimates put forward by the regions, moreover, had not always been accurate. 
De ursprungliga uppskattningar som regionerna lade fram var dessutom inte alltid korrekta.
Finally, in some cases the level of premiums proved not to be adequate, especially in high-profit intensive land. 
I vissa fall, slutligen, visade sig stdnivn inte vara tillrcklig, srskilt nr det gllde hgavkastande intensivt brukad mark.