natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Table 2 shows the development and utilisation of the budget appropriations for the financial years 1995 to 2002 in respect of the special budget headings managed by the Directorate-General for the Environment(3). 
I tabell 2 visas hur budgetanslagen fr de specifika budgetposter som frvaltas av Generaldirektoratet fr milj har utvecklats under budgetren 1995 till 2002 och hur de har utnyttjats (3).
LIFE-Environment and LIFE-Nature are financed under budget heading B4-3 2 0 (4) and LIFE-Third countries under heading B7-8 1 0. 
Life-Milj och Life-Natur finansieras ur budgetpost B4Đ3 2 0 (4) och Life-Tredje land ur budgetpost B7Đ8 1 0.
Altogether, LIFE represents approximately 70 % of all the appropriations managed by the Directorate-General for the Environment. 
Totalt str Life fr cirka 70 % av det totala budgetanslag som frvaltas av Generaldirektoratet fr milj.
The commitment appropriations available for each financial year were used almost in their entirety, with the exception of those for 2000. 
Med undantag fr budgetret 2000 har de tillgngliga tagandebemyndigandena varje budgetr utnyttjats nstan helt.
Only 32 % of the latter were used, owing, in particular, to the low rate of utilisation of the appropriations available for LIFE (4 %): the Regulation concerning the third stage of LIFE was adopted in July 2000 but did not result in any projects being approved in that year. 
Detta r utnyttjades endast 32 % av tagandena, frmst p grund av det lga utnyttjandet av de anslag som var disponibla fr Life (4 %), vars frordning fr den tredje etappen antogs i juli 2000 och inte ledde till ngra godknda projekt under det ret.
Of the budget of 450 million euro provided for in the Regulation, 435 million euro were, in the end, charged to the budgets for 1996 to 1999. 
Av den budgetram p 450 miljoner euro som avses i frordningen verfrdes slutligen 435 miljoner euro till budgetarna fr 1996Đ1999.
A comparison of the ÔNatureŐ and ÔEnvironmentŐ strands of LIFE II shows a fairly equal distribution of the commitment appropriations (207,9 million euro for ÔNatureŐ compared with 207,8 million euro for ÔEnvironmentŐ) and the payment appropriations (160,7 million euro for ÔNatureŐ compared with 157,6 million euro for ÔEnvironmentŐ) (see Table 3). 
En jmfrelse mellan temaomrdena Natur och Milj i Life II visar att det finns en rimlig frdelning mellan tagandebemyndiganden (det vill sga 207,9 miljoner euro fr Natur mot 207,8 miljoner euro fr Milj) och betalningsbemyndiganden (160,7 miljoner euro fr Natur mot 157,6 miljoner euro fr Milj) (se tabell 3).
Of the new countries applying for accession, Romania was the first to participate in these strands of the LIFE programme. 
Rumnien var det frsta av de nya kandidatlnderna som medverkade i Life-programmets temaomrden.
Table 4 shows the amounts allocated to projects under the ÔThird countriesŐ strand in the context of LIFE II. 
I tabell 4 visas de finansiella medel som har anslagits till projekt p temaomrdet Tredje land inom ramen fr Life II (5).
According to the Regulation the amount of resources to be allocated to accompanying measures such as monitoring and evaluation is 3 % of the total budget. 
Det belopp som frordningen anger kan ansls till kompletterande tgrder, till exempel vervakning och utvrdering, utgr 3 % av den totala budgeten.
This rate was exceeded and 3,17 % of the earmarked commitments were allocated, i.e. a total of 13,81 million euro. 
Denna andel verskreds och uppgick till 3,17 % av de kontrakterade tagandena, vilket motsvarar sammanlagt 13,81 miljoner euro.
For LIFE-Nature, the rate was higher (4 %, i.e. 8,2 million euro) (see Table 5). 
Fr Life-Natur r andelen hgre (4 % eller 8,2 miljoner euro) (se tabell 5).
In December 2002, for LIFE II, these commitments, numbering 380, were 47,2, 50,3 and 3,9 million euro for LIFE-Nature, LIFE-Environment and LIFE-Third countries respectively. 
I december 2002 uppgick de 380 lpande tagandena fr Life II till 47,2, 50,3 och 13,9 miljoner euro fr Life-Natur, Life-Milj respektive Life-Tredje land.
Twenty-six of these commitments (4,8 million euro) overran the final date for implementation. 
Av dessa taganden (4,8 miljoner euro) verskred 26 tidsgrnsen fr genomfrandet.
(3) For the previous years, please refer to Chapter 6 of the CourtŐs Annual Report concerning the financial year 1994 (OJ C 303, 14.11.1995, p. 
(3) Fr fregende r, se kapitel 6 i revisionsrttens rsrapport fr budgetret 1994 (EGT C 303, 14.11.1995 s.
(4) In 1995 LIFE-Environment was financed under budget heading B4-3 5 0. 
(4) 1995 finansierades Life-Milj under budgetavdelningen B4Đ3 5 0.
(5) The ÔThird countryŐ strand is open to Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, Kaliningrad and the region of St Petersburg. 
(5) Temaomrdet Tredje land r ppet fr Albanien, Algeriet, Bosnien-Hercegovina, Cypern, Egypten, Israel, Jordanien, Kroatien, Libanon, Malta, Marocko, Syrien, Tunisien, Turkiet, Vstbanken och Gazaremsan, Kaliningrad och omrdet kring Sankt Petersburg.
Source: Revenue and expenditure accounts (Volume II) for the years mentioned. Total LIFE 12,444 Total LIFE Total LIFE Total LIFE Total LIFE Total LIFE Total LIFE 89,619 Total Title B4-3 151,925 Final appropriations available Utilisation rate (%) Final appropriations available To settle the commitments for previous years (e) 20,883 24,506 To settle the commitments for the year (f) Utilisation rate (%) 48,500 5,750 102,750 146,618 90,000 6,000 96,000 136,329 90,000 4,500 94,500 132,066 100,000 4,825 104,825 141,031 135,252 5,550 140,802 184,098 113,131 6,622 119,753 161,797 170,912 9,184 0,315 180,411 232,776 148,510 6,522 0,381 155,413 213,431 5,447 102,435 143,715 89,923 6,000 95,923 135,850 89,909 4,312 94,221 131,920 99,669 4,824 104,493 140,385 134,451 5,540 139,991 182,907 4,762 0,022 4,784 49,212 152,525 9,067 0,215 161,807 213,355 148,461 5,733 0,381 154,575 212,040 94,73 99,69 98,02 99,91 6,500 103,250 150,039 75,400 6,000 81,400 123,179 90,000 5,400 95,400 138,186 82,200 4,000 86,200 126,272 92,552 4,500 97,052 140,265 94,435 4,432 98,867 150,933 121,445 4,685 0,315 126,445 180,406 106,524 7,092 0,381 113,997 163,138 4,103 49,492 63,952 53,981 7,852 Ń 4,103 61,936 91,153 75,229 Commitment appropriations Payment appropriations Payments against appropriations for the year Total commitments Total payments Table 2 Appropriations in the ÔenvironmentŐ title of the budget and use made of them from 1995 to 2002 (differentiated appropriations) (million euro) 
II) fr ovannmnda r. Disponibla slutliga anslag taganden totalt Utnyttjandegrad (%) Disponibla slutliga anslag Fr att betala tidigare budgetrs taganden Fr att betala budgetrets taganden (f) Betalningar totalt Utnyttjandegrad (%) Tabell 2 Anslag inom avdelningen ÓmiljÓ i budgeten och utnyttjandet av dem 1995 till 2001 (differentierade anslag) (miljoner euro)
2.12.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 292/11 Table 3 LIFE II Nature + Environment Ń B4-3 2 0 0 + B4-3 2 0 1 and part of B4-3 2 0 9 from 2000 onwards Ń Comparison of the amounts of commitments and payments LIFE II-Nature Ń B4-3 2 0 0 and part of B4-3 2 0 9 from 2000 onwards LIFE II-Environment Ń B4-3 2 0 1 and part of B4-3 2 0 9 from 2000 onwards Country Number of commitments 1996 to 2002 Amounts committed to the projects 7 801 990,00 2 501 418,00 18 950 305,37 15 744 650,00 29 924 908,38 17 559 250,04 1 513 475,00 23 816 292,40 1 351 985,00 5 396 924,00 15 318 662,40 10 512 039,00 16 367 319,00 18 326 045,00 14 098 261,00 517 057,24 199 700 581,83 8 227 863,00 207 928 444,83 Amounts paid to the projects 6 115 390,87 1 987 651,05 14 798 168,13 12 900 799,39 21 105 393,46 12 890 783,68 945 390,00 17 050 709,96 618 686,60 5 042 933,69 12 438 466,58 8 330 285,76 14 479 909,89 12 358 309,73 11 780 414,85 392 413,83 153 235 707,47 7 501 967,77 160 737 675,24 Number of commitments 38 16 50 29 63 55 11 62 2 38 22 20 23 21 43 6 499 64 563 1996 to 2002 Amounts committed to the projects 16 017 621,35 8 651 845,98 21 010 803,15 13 189 471,46 21 203 105,20 21 313 000,00 4 935 832,98 23 881 311,90 1 188 073,74 14 674 705,49 9 248 543,82 5 333 628,39 7 700 524,39 11 521 149,24 22 152 757,18 734 120,47 202 756 494,74 5 053 817,89 207 810 312,63 Amounts paid to the projects 9 711 669,27 7 336 368,14 18 976 992,29 9 879 468,74 16 266 421,78 18 133 973,58 3 559 854,27 18 178 319,94 950 459,42 10 425 142,68 6 321 804,85 3 276 844,63 7 069 531,52 9 868 071,79 12 322 611,20 565 182,99 152 842 717,09 4 712 621,83 157 555 338,92 Belgium 14 Denmark 4 Germany 29 Greece 17 Spain 58 France 31 Ireland 1 Italy 72 Luxembourg 2 Netherlands 5 Austria 13 Portugal 17 Finland 20 Sweden 14 United Kingdom 11 Romania 4 Total without administrative expenditure External assistance and administrative expenditure Total (projects, external assistance and administrative expenditure) 312 14 326 Source: Revenue and expenditure accounts Volume II, Sincom1 (1996/1997) and Sincom2 (from 1998). 
2.12.2003 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 292/11 Tabell 3 Life II Natur + Milj Đ B4-3 2 0 0 + B4-3 2 0 1 och en del av B4-3 2 0 9 fr.o.m. 2000 Đ En jmfrelse mellan beloppen fr taganden och betalningar Life II Natur Đ B4-3 2 0 0 och en del av B4-3 2 0 9 fr.o.m. 2000 Life II Milj Đ B4-3 2 0 1 och en del av B4-3 2 0 9 fr.o.m.
Table 4 LIFE II-Third countries Ń B7-8 1 0 0 Ń Comparison of the amounts of commitments and payments LIFE II-Third countries Ń B7-8 1 0 0 1996 to 2002 Code AL BA CY DZ EG IL JO LB MA MT PS RU SY TN TR INT Country Number of commitments Amounts committed to the projects 763 520,00 701 000,00 1 744 975,06 50 000,00 827 850,00 1 234 607,20 402 580,00 719 260,00 1 074 217,46 860 921,09 1 341 636,25 2 734 945,00 638 536,67 380 026,49 3 585 987,51 3 050 130,25 20 110 192,98 533 367,00 20 643 559,98 Amounts paid to the projects 746 867,57 647 080,00 1 398 305,57 30 000,00 745 065,00 933 804,72 336 274,00 639 063,90 449 317,26 779 367,53 1 274 936,25 2 295 813,64 595 201,00 280 244,69 2 789 731,59 2 374 831,43 16 315 904,15 436 603,62 16 752 507,77 Albania Bosnia and Herzegovina Cyprus Algeria Egypt Israel Jordan Lebanon Morocco Malta West Bank and Gaza Russia 11 Syria 2 Tunisia 2 Turkey 11 International (countries not specified) 6 Subtotal 67 External assistance and administrative 9 expenditure Total (projects, external assistance 76 and administrative expenditure) 2 3 7 1 2 5 1 2 5 4 3 Source: Revenue and expenditure accounts Volume II, Sincom1 (1996/1997) and Sincom2 (from 1998). 
Tabell 4 Life II Tredje land Đ B7-8 1 0 0 Đ En jmfrelse mellan beloppen fr taganden och betalningar Life II Tredje land Đ B7-8 1 0 0 1996Đ2002 Landskod Land Antal taganden Belopp fr vilka taganden har gjorts fr projekten 763 520,00 701 000,00 1 744 975,06 50 000,00 827 850,00 1 234 607,20 402 580,00 719 260,00 1 074 217,46 860 921,09 1 341 636,25 2 734 945,00 638 536,67 380 026,49 3 585 987,51 3 050 130,25 20 110 192,98 533 367,00 20 643 559,98 Belopp som har betalats fr projekten 746 867,57 647 080,00 1 398 305,57 30 000,00 745 065,00 933 804,72 336 274,00 639 063,90 449 317,26 779 367,53 1 274 936,25 2 295 813,64 595 201,00 280 244,69 2 789 731,59 2 374 831,43 16 315 904,15 436 603,62 16 752 507,77 AL Albanien BA Bosnien-Hercegovina CY Cypern DZ Algeriet EG Egypten IL Israel JO Jordanien LB Libanon MA Marocko MT Malta PS Vstbanken och Gazaremsan RU Ryssland 11 SY Syrien 2 TN Tunisien 2 TR Turkiet 11 INT Internationellt (lnder ej faststllda) 6 Delsumma 67 Externt std och administrativa utgifter 9 Totalt (projekt, externt bistnd och 76 administrativa utgifter) 2 3 7 1 2 5 1 2 5 4 3 Klla: Inkomst-och utgiftsredovisning vol.
C 292/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union Table 5 LIFE II Ń Implementation Ń Comparison of the maximum amount indicated in Regulation (EC) No 1404/96, Annex 1, Article 8(1), with the amount actually committed 2.12.2003 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) = (3) Ń (2) (6) = (5) / (2) (7) (8) = (3) + (7) (9) = (7) / (8) Allocation to the various strands Percentage rate of the amount of 450 million euro to be allocated to each of the strands according to Regulation (EC) No 1404/96 Share of the amount of 450 million euro to be allocated to each of the strands Amounts committed (million euro) Percentage rate of the total amount actually committed to each strand Difference (million euro) Percentage difference for each of the strands External assistance and administrative expenditure (million euro) Total committed (million euro) Percentage rate of total amount actually committed to ÔExternal assistance and administrative expenditureŐ Total for LIFE II 100 % 450,00 LIFE II-Nature 46 % 207,00 199,70 45,76 % - 7,30 - 3,5 % 8,23 207,93 3,96 % LIFE-II Environment 46 % 207,00 202,76 46,46 % - 4,24 - 2,1 % 5,05 207,81 2,43 % LIFE II-Third countries 5 % 22,50 20,11 4,61 % - 2,39 - 10,6 % 0,53 20,64 2,58 % Accompanying measures 3 % 13,50 13,81 3,17 % 100% 436,38 0,31 2,3 % Ń Ń Ń - 13,62 - 3,0 % 13,81 436,38 3,17 % Source: Revenue and expenditure accounts Volume II, Sincom1 (1996/1997) and Sincom2 (from 1998). 
C 292/12 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning Tabell 5 Life II Đ Genomfrande Đ En jmfrelse mellan det maximala belopp som anges i frordning (EG) nr 1404/96, bilaga I, artikel 8.1, och det belopp fr vilket taganden faktiskt har gjorts 2.12.2003 Anslag till olika temaomrden (1) Procentandel fr beloppet p 450 miljoner euro som skall ansls till varje temaomrde enligt frordning (EG) nr 1404/96 (2) Del av beloppet p 450 miljoner euro som skall ansls till varje temaomrde (3) Belopp fr vilka taganden har gjorts (i miljoner euro) (4) Procentandel fr det belopp som faktiskt har anslagits till varje temaomrde (5)=(3)-(2) Differens (i miljoner euro) (6)=(5)/(2) Procentandel fr differensen fr varje temaomrde (7) Externt std och administrativa utgifter (i miljoner euro) (8)=(3)+(7) Totalt belopp fr vilket taganden har gjorts (i miljoner euro) (9)=(7)/(8) Procentandel fr det belopp fr vilket taganden faktiskt har gjorts under budgetpost ÓExternt std och administrativa Life II Natur 46 % 207,00 199,70 45,76 - 7,30 - 3,5 % 8,23 207,93 3,96 % Life II Milj 46 % 207,00 202,76 46,46 Life II Tredje land Kompletterande tgrder Totalt fr Life II 100 % 450,00 5% 3% 22,50 20,11 4,61 % - 2,39 - 10,6 % 0,53 20,64 2,58 % 13,50 13,81 % % 436,38 3,17 % 100% - 4,24 - 2,1 % 5,05 207,81 2,43 % 0,31 2,3 % Ń Ń Ń - 13,62 - 3,0 % 13,81 436,38 3,17 % utgifterÓ Klla: Utgifts-och inkomstredovisning vol.
SELECTION OF PROJECTS Selection procedures 28. 
URVAL AV PROJEKT Urvalsfrfaranden 28.
In accordance with Article 9 of the LIFE Regulation, the Member States forward to the Commission, before 31 January of each year, proposals for actions to be financed. 
I enlighet med artikel 9 i Life-frordningen lmnar medlemsstaterna varje r fre den 31 januari frslag p vilka tgrder som skall finansieras till kommissionen.
Applications from third countries are submitted to the Commission by the national authorities concerned. 
Anskningarna frn tredje land verlmnas till kommissionen av de berrda nationella myndigheterna.
The proposals received are then evaluated with a view to a possible decision to finance them. 
De inkomna frslagen utvrderas fr att ett eventuellt beslut om finansiering skall kunna fattas.
For the projects that were checked, the curricula vitae of these experts were not usually kept. 
Nr det gller de projekt som granskades hade i allmnhet inte dessa experters meritfrteckningar sparats.
It was therefore not possible to ascertain that they did not in fact come from a national body which was itself directly or indirectly responsible for the management of LIFE projects (1). 
Drfr gick det inte att frskra sig om att de inte kom frn en nationell enhet som direkt eller indirekt ansvarade fr frvaltningen av Life-projekten (1).
In the case of the LIFE II period, since the evaluation reports drawn up by the experts are not systematically archived or registered in the CommissionŐs files, the results of the evaluation cannot be substantiated. 
Eftersom experternas utvrderingar inte sparas och registreras p ett systematiskt stt i kommissionens handlingar nr det gller perioden fr Life II gr det inte att bekrfta resultaten av utvrderingarna.
These documents, which are of fundamental importance for supporting and justifying the choices made, have not been kept. 
Dessa dokument, som r av grundlggande betydelse nr man skall motivera urvalet av projekt, har inte sparats.
In those cases where the marks awarded are available in an electronic database it is seldom possible, in the absence of the original documents, to verify their authenticity and conformity with the underlying evaluation. 
I de fall d de tilldelade pongen fr ett projekt finns tillgngliga i en elektronisk databas gr det sllan att kontrollera om de verkligen stmmer verens med den grundlggande utvrderingen eftersom originaldokumenten saknas.
(1) See also the Court of AuditorsŐ Annual Report concerning the financial year 2001, paragraph 4.22 (OJ C 295, 28.11.2002). 
(1) Se ocks revisionsrttens rsrapport fr budgetret 2001, punkt 4.22 (EGT C 295, 28.11.2002).
2.12.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 292/13 Selection procedures for the three strands of LIFE II 32. 
2.12.2003 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 292/13 Urvalsfrfaranden fr Life II:s tre temaomrden 32.
For the sake of independence, transparency and harmonisation of procedures, the Commission should consider the possibility of entrusting the evaluation to outside experts. 
I sin strvan efter oberoende, mjlighet till insyn och harmonisering br kommissionen vervga mjligheten att verlta utvrderingen till externa experter.
As regards project proposals under LIFE-Third countries, the desk officer preselects an initial list of projects and submits it to a group of external evaluators. 
Nr det gller projektfrslagen inom Life-Tredje land gr samordnaren ett frsta urval och upprttar en frsta projektlista som verlmnas till en grupp externa utvrderare.
The projects selected by the outside experts are then submitted to the LIFE-Environment Regulatory Committee for an opinion. 
De projekt som de externa experterna vljer ut lmnas sedan ver till Life-Miljs regleringskommitt fr yttrande.
It was noted, for all the files examined, that the basic evaluation documents drawn up by the outside experts were not kept, as there were no precise instructions on this subject. 
Nr det gller alla de handlingar som granskades kunde det konstateras att de externa experternas grundlggande utvrderingsdokument inte hade sparats p grund av att det saknades tydliga anvisningar angende detta.
Evaluation criteria 34. 
Utvrderingskriterier 34.
Article 9a of the LIFE Regulation lays down the list of general criteria, specific criteria for actions concerning nature conservation as defined under Article 2(1)(a), actions concerning industrial activity and to support local authorities, preparatory actions and criteria applicable to actions to be implemented in third countries. 
I artikel 9 a i Life-frordningen finns det en lista med allmnna kriterier, srskilda kriterier nr det gller naturskyddst-grder som anges i artikel 2.1 a, tgrder avseende industriell verksamhet och tgrder till frmn fr lokala myndigheter, frberedande tgrder samt kriterier fr tgrder som skall genomfras i tredje land.
C 292/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 2.12.2003 35. 
C 292/14 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 2.12.2003 35.
Projects put forward for financing are classified by awarding them a mark in the case of the ÔEnvironmentŐ and ÔThird countriesŐ strands and on the basis of a qualitative assessment in the case of the ÔNatureŐ strand. 
De projekt som fresls f finansiering rangordnas efter ett sifferbetyg nr det gller temaomrdena Milj och Tredje land och efter en kvalitativ bedmning nr det gller temaomrdet Natur.
In the case of projects under LIFE-Environment, some of the criteria that the evaluators were obliged to apply were amended for LIFE III in comparison with LIFE II in order to simplify them (1). 
Nr det gller projekten inom Life-Milj ndrades vissa av de kriterier som utvrderarna var skyldiga att anvnda sig av fr Life III jmfrt med dem som tidigare gllde fr Life II fr att de skulle bli enklare och tydligare (1).
Nevertheless, it is still difficult for the evaluators to form a precise opinion on the subject because the criteria have been combined and as a consequence have become more vague and difficult to apply. 
Det r dock fortfarande svrt fr utvrderarna att stadkomma ett klart och tydligt yttrande i frgan eftersom kriterierna har slagits ihop och fljaktligen blivit mer vaga och svrare att tillmpa.
Evaluation criteria for all the strands of LIFE III are now published in the application guides available on the LIFE website but with varying degrees of detail: LIFE-Nature and LIFE-Environment define the criteria whereas for LIFE-Third countries they appear, without explanation, in the form of a simple list without any detailed description. 
Utvrderingskriterierna fr samtliga temaomrden inom Life III finns nu sammanstllda i den vgledning fr skande som finns tillgnglig p Lifes hemsida, men de skiljer sig i frga om tydlighet; kriterierna beskrivs utfrligt fr temaomrdena Life-Natur och Life-Milj, medan de utan ngon annan frklaring dyker upp i form av en enkel lista fr temaomrdet Life-Tredje land.
The role of the Member States 38. 
Medlemsstaternas roll 38.
In accordance with the LIFE Regulation, the Member States forward proposals for LIFE-Environment and LIFE-Nature projects to the Commission for selection. 
I enlighet med Life-frordningen meddelar medlemsstaterna frslag p Life-Milj-projekt och Life-Natur-projekt till kommissionen fr att denna skall kunna gra ett urval.
Some Member States apply the CommissionŐs criteria or their own criteria to evaluate the proposals and give them an order of priority. 
Vissa medlemsstater utgr ifrn kommissionens eller sina egna kriterier nr de utvrderar frslagen och ger dem en prioritetsordning.
The results of these practices, which are not provided for in the Regulation, should be comparable so that the prioritisation of proposals is done at European level. 
Resultaten av denna metod, som inte freskrivs i frordningen, br kunna jmfras med varandra s att det gr att gra en prioritetsordning p europeisk niv.
Before adoption by the Commission, draft decisions to grant financial aid must receive a favourable opinion from one of the two Regulatory Committees, one responsible for LIFE-Nature and the other for LIFE-Environment and LIFE-Third countries. 
Innan kommissionen fattar sitt beslut mste de projekt som beviljats finansiellt std f ett positivt yttrande frn en av de tv regleringskommitterna, en som ansvarar fr Life-Natur och en annan fr Life-Milj och Life-Tredje land.
The Commission sends the Committees a list of projects ranked according to the evaluation carried out, divided into two parts: the first represents the budget available, the second is a reserve list. 
Kommissionen ger kommitterna en lista dr projekten r rangordnade enligt utvrderingen och som bestr av tv delar: den frsta motsvarar den disponibla budgeten, den andra r en reservlista.
For LIFE-Environment the Member StatesŐ evaluation is attached to the evaluation sheet for the projects submitted to the Committee, but this is not the case for LIFE-Nature (2). 
Nr det gller Life-Milj bifogas medlemsstaternas bedmning den utvrdering av projekten som ges till kommittn, vilket inte r fallet fr Life-Natur (2).
The representatives of the Member States take part in the selection of the projects in the context of the work of the Committees. 
Inom ramen fr kommitternas arbete deltar medlemsstaternas fretrdare i urvalet av projekt.