natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Please refer to the related page on the test version of the new Commission web presence: http://beta.ec.europa.eu/ funding‐tenders_en This new web presence is due to go live in 2016, including this page. 
Se relaterad sida i testversionen av kommissionens nya webbnrvaro: http://beta.ec.Europa.EU/Funding-tenders_en Denna nya webbnrvaro, inklusive denna sida, planeras tas i drift under 2016.
Work is on‐going in order to produce the related content, in coordination with the SEDIA initiative (assessment made by Commission services to identify the corporate solution to support the full funding and tenders life cycles) and Participant Portal (IT solution currently supporting call for proposals and grant management for several important EU programs, including Horizon 2020) team. 
Arbete pgr fr nrvarande med att producera relaterat innehll, i samordning med Sedia-initiativet (en bedmning som gjorts av kommissionens avdelningar fr att identifiera en lmplig fretagslsning fr att stdja de fullstndiga finansierings-och anbuds-cyklerna) och en deltagarportal-gruppen (en it-lsning som fr nrvarande stder anbudsinfordran och bidragsfrvaltning fr flera viktiga EU-program, inklusive Horisont 2020).
Replies of the Commission 80 Recommendation 6 The Commission does not accept this recommendation. 
Kommissionens svar 80 Rekommendation 6 Kommissionen godtar inte denna rekommendation.
The Commission does not consider necessary to propose amendments to the FR on the review of complaints The Financial Regulation already provides that the unsuccessful tenderers are notified of the grounds and details reasons for their rejection and they may request additional information in accordance with Articles 113(3) FR and 161(2) RAP. 
Kommissionen anser det inte vara ndvndigt att fresl ndringar av budgetfrordningen nr det gller granskning av klagoml. Det freskrivs redan i budgetfrordningen att anbudsgivare vars anbud frkastats ska informeras om sklen och f detaljerade frklaringar om avvisandet. De kan dessutom begra ytterligare information i enlighet med artikel 113.3 i budgetfrordningen och artikel 161.2 i tillmpningsfreskrifterna.
See also the Commission replies to paragraphs 78 and 79. 
Se ven kommissionens svar p punkterna 78 och 79.
Recommendation 7 As far as the Commission is concerned, it partially accepts this recommendation and will implement it as outlined below. 
Rekommendation 7 Kommissionen godtar denna rekommendation delvis i den mn den berrs, och kommer att genomfra den enligt nedan.
Considering the significant administrative burden that would result from the setting‐up of such monitoring system, the Commission will assess to what extent TED eTendering can provide cost‐efficient access to further procurement data, taking into account budgetary and human resources constraints. 
Med tanke p den stora administrativa brda som inrttandet av ett sdant vervakningssystem skulle ge upphov till kommer kommissionen att bedma i vilken utstrckning TED eTendering kan ge kostnadseffektiv tillgng till ytterligare upphandlingsdata, med hnsyn till budget-och personalbegrnsningar.
Recommendation 8 The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Rekommendation 8 Kommissionen godtar denna rekommendation.
The new OLAF Content Management system (OCM) is expected to be in place by July 2016. 
Olafs nya innehllshanteringssystem (OCM) frvntas tas i drift till juli 2016.
The module foreseen for statistics and reports will be available with a later release in 2017. 
Den planerade statistik-och rapport-modulen kommer att lanseras senare under 2017.
Recommendation 9 Insofar as it is concerned by it, the Commission accepts this recommendation under the condition that the peer review is conducted on a need basis and does not become a permanent process that would require additional budgetary and/or human resources. 
Rekommendation 9 Kommissionen godtar denna rekommendation i den mn den berrs, p villkor att inbrdes granskningar genomfrs vid behov och inte blir en permanent process som krver ytterligare budget-och/eller personalresurser.
Replies of the European 81 Central Bank 50 The ECB is of the view that the procurement procedure was conducted in compliance with the ECB procurement rules. 
Svar frn Europeiska 81 centralbanken 50 ECB anser att upphandlingsfrfarandet utfrdes i enlighet med ECB:s upphandlingsregler.
In this respect, the ECB notes that the urgency argumentation was used in a sound and adequate manner and diligently reasoned. 
I detta avseende noterar ECB att argumentet fr brdska anvndes p ett sunt och adekvat stt och var motiverat.
The underlying event causing the extreme urgency was not attributable to the ECB and there was an evident causal link between the unforeseeable developments and the urgency resulting therefrom. 
Den bakomliggande orsaken till synnerlig brdska kunde inte tillskrivas ECB och det fanns ett bevisat orsakssamband mellan den ofrutsedda utvecklingen och den brdska som uppkom drav.
Due to the extreme urgency of the matter the time limits for an accelerated public tender, which in practice still requires three to four months at the best from dispatch of the contract notice until contract signature, could not be complied with. 
Med anledning av denna brdska kunde inte tidsramarna fr en pskyndad offentlig upphandling uppfyllas. Dessa krver i praktiken fortfarande i bsta fall tre till fyra mnader, frn tidpunkten fr utskickandet av anbudsinfordran till undertecknandet av kontraktet.
In fact, in the chosen competitive five quotes tender procedure the contract was awarded and signed within six weeks as of the date of tender dispatch. 
Det r de facto s att i det anbudsfrfarande med fem deltagare som valdes, tilldelades och undertecknades kontraktet inom sex veckor efter det att upphandlingen inletts.
Moreover, the chosen procedure ensured a sound level of competition and the resulting contract was strictly limited to address the immediate needs. 
Dessutom skerstllde det valda frfarandet en sund niv av konkurrens och det pfljande kontraktet var strikt begrnsat till de omedelbara behoven.
The ECB would also like to recall that once it became evident that the respective type of consultancy services may be required on a more continuous supply basis, it tendered out these services via a public tender procedure. 
ECB skulle ven vilja ppeka att s snart det uppenbarades att det kunde finnas ett mer kontinuerligt behov av respektive typ av konsulttjnster, upphandlades dessa tjnster genom ett offentligt anbudsfrfarande.
Furthermore, please find below the ECB’s comments on some of the recommendations issued by the ECA. 
Nedan finns ECB:s kommentarer till en del av de rekommendationer som utfrdats av ECA.
Recommendation 1 The ECB in principle agrees with the recommendation. 
Rekommendation 1 ECB instmmer i princip med rekommendationen.
The ECB plans to gradually roll out an electronic tendering system in the course of 2016. 
ECB avser att gradvis lansera ett elektroniskt system fr anbud under 2016.
In this context the ECB will investigate how to measure, in a more systematic yet still efficient manner, the level of participation in its public tender procedures with regard to the number of applications and tenders received. 
I detta sammanhang kommer ECB att underska hur man mer systematiskt Đ men fortfarande effektivt Đ mter deltagandenivn i sina offentliga anbudsfrfaranden avseende antal anskningar och anbud.
Recommendation 3 The ECB agrees with the recommendation to follow a more proactive approach with regard to market consultation prior to starting the formal procurement process in order to gain market intelligence, facilitate requirements engi‐ neering and eventually obtain better value for money. 
Rekommendation 3 ECB instmmer med rekommendationen att flja ett proaktivare tillvgagngsstt vad gller marknadssamrd fre pbrjandet av det formella upphandlingsfrfarandet fr att drigenom erhlla marknadsinformation, underltta utformningen av krav och s smningom f mer vrde fr pengarna.
Recommendation 4 The ECB in principle agrees with the recommendation, subject to the understanding that the division of contracts in lots must be effective and efficient from a business perspective in terms of contract execution and management. 
Rekommendation 4 ECB instmmer i princip med rekommendationen, givet insikten att uppdelningen av kontrakt i delar mste ske effektivt ur ett affrsperspektiv vad gller genomfrande av kontrakt och hantering.
If dividing contracts into lots, whilst theoretically possible, could imply the risk that the contract execution would become technically too complex or would not ensure good value for money, or that the coordination of several con‐ tractors would undermine the sound management and execution of the contract, the division in lots is not deemed effective. 
Uppdelning av kontrakt i delar r visserligen teoretiskt mjlig, men anses inte vara effektiv eftersom den kan innebra att genomfrandet av kontrakten blir fr tekniskt komplext, alternativt inte skerstller vrde fr pengarna, eller att samordningen av flertalet uppdragstagare kan underminera sund hantering och sunt genomfrande av kontraktet.
Recommendation 5 The ECB procurement section of the ECB website provides the public with a central, single repository of notices and publications (‘one‐stop‐shop’), published by the ECB in the context of procurement, in an easily accessible manner. 
Rekommendation 5 Genom sektionen fr upphandling p ECB:s webbplats fr allmnheten p ett enkelt tillgng till en central datasam-ling av underrttelser och publikationer (Óone-stop-shopÓ), som publicerats av ECB inom ramen fr upphandling.
In addition, the ECB plans to gradually roll out an electronic tendering system in the course of 2016. 
Dessutom avser ECB att gradvis lansera ett elektroniskt system fr anbud under 2016.
Furthermore the ECB has its own dedicated procurement rules. 
Vidare har ECB sina egna fastslagna upphandlingsregler.
Replies of the European Central Bank 82 Therefore, the ECB partially agrees with the recommendation, provided that the envisaged website would be a sim‐ ple and straight forward information portal, avoiding any additional overhead and complexity layers. 
Svar frn Europeiska centralbanken 82 Drfr instmmer ECB delvis med rekommendationen, frutsatt att den planerade webbplatsen blir en enkel och rttfram informationsportal, undvikandes ytterligare omkostnader och komplexitetsskikt.
Regarding the ECB, such a portal would simply link to the procurement section of the ECB’s website for further information about ECB procurements. 
Fr ECB:s del skulle en sdan portal helt enkelt lnka till sektionen fr upphandling p ECB:s webbplats fr vidare information om ECB:s upphandlingar.
This would avoid duplication and proliferation of information and related inefficiencies. 
Genom detta skulle dubbel insamling och spridning av information, samt ineffektivitet, undvikas.
Eco‐ nomic operators interested in ECB procurements would continue to interact with the ECB via the ECB’s website and the established communication channels. 
Ekonomiska aktrer intresserade av ECB:s upphandlingar skulle fortstta att interagera med ECB via ECB:s webbplats och de etablerade kommunikationskanalerna.
Given that TED (Tenders Electronic Daily) is the official and central online version of the 'Supplement to the Offi‐ cial Journal' of the EU, dedicated to European public procurement, it may also be advisable to investigate how TED could be further improved to provide for an appropriate overview on the procurement opportunities of the institutions. 
D TED (Tenders Electronic Daily) r den officiella onlineversionen av EU:s ÓTillgg till Europeiska unionens officiella tidningÓ, om offentliga upphandlingar i Europa, kan det ven vara tillrdligt att underska hur TED ytterligare kan frbttras fr att ge en lmplig versikt ver institutionernas upphandlingsmjligheter.
Recommendation 7 See the ECB reply to recommendation 5. 
Rekommendation 7 Se ECB:s svar p rekommendation 5.
The ECB partially agrees with the recommendation, provided that the envisaged repository would be a simple tool that would not add additional overhead and complexity layers. 
ECB instmmer delvis med rekommendationen, frutsatt att den planerade datasamlingen blir ett enkelt verktyg som inte medfr ytterligare omkostnader eller komplexitetsskikt.
Regarding the ECB, the public repository would sim‐ ply link to the procurement section of the ECB’s website that entails relevant information regarding its procurement activities. 
Fr ECB:s del skulle den offentliga datasamlingen helt enkelt lnka till sektionen fr upphandling p ECB:s webbplats med relevant information om ECB:s upphandlingar.
Recommendation 9 The ECB agrees with the notion to facilitate and foster mutual learning and exchange best practices. 
Rekommendation 9 ECB instmmer med tanken att underltta och frmja msesidigt lrande och utbyta bsta praxis.
For example, the ECB participates in an active network of procurement experts across the European System of Cen‐ tral Banks that permits for a structured exchange of best practices. 
ECB deltar exempelvis i ett aktivt ntverk av upphandlingsexperter inom Europeiska centralbanksystemet, vilket mjliggr ett strukturerat utbyte av bsta praxis.
Moreover, the ECB’s central procurement unit has undergone an external certification related to best procurement practices in the past, and is currently undergoing a recertification process. 
Dessutom har ECB:s centrala upphandlingsavdelning genomgtt en extern certifiering relaterad till bsta upphandlingspraxis som anvnts tidigare och genomgr fr nrvarande en omcertifieringsprocess.
Replies of the European 83 Ombudsman The European Ombudsman is at present the only external non‐judicial review body accessible to economic opera‐ tors who consider they were unfairly treated in the public procurement procedures organised by EU institutions and bodies. 
Svar frn Europeiska 83 ombudsmannen Europeiska ombudsmannen r fr nrvarande det enda externa versynsorgan utanfr domstolsvsendet som ekonomiska aktrer har tillgng till om de anser att de blivit orttvist behandlade i frfaranden fr offentlig upphandling som arrangeras av EU:s institutioner och organ.
If necessary, the European Ombudsman investigates such complaints and addresses recommendations to the institutions and bodies concerned. 
Vid behov undersker Europeiska ombudsmannen sdana klagoml och lmnar rekommendationer till berrda institutioner och organ.
Neither Article 228 TFEU nor the Ombudsman's Statute1 provides for an appeal or other remedy against the Ombudsman's decisions. 
Varken artikel 228 i frdraget om Europeiska unionens funktionsstt eller ombudsmannens stadga1 innehller ngon mjlighet till verklagande eller annan tgrd mot ombudsmannens beslut.
Paragraph 85 ‐87 The factual findings concerning the European Ombudsman made in paragraphs 85, 86 and 87 are accurate and pro‐ vide a fair picture of the Ombudsman's activity on complaints relating to public procurement. 
Punkterna 85Đ87 De faktiska slutsatserna rrande Europeiska ombudsmannen, som terfinns i punkterna 85, 86 och 87, r korrekta och ger en rttvis bild av ombudsmannens hantering av klagoml som gller offentlig upphandling.
The Ombudsman agrees that the procedural requirement from Article 2.4 of the European Ombudsman's Statute may indeed hamper the Ombudsman's quick reaction to a complaint concerning a public procurement proce‐ dure. 
Ombudsmannen instmmer i att procedurkraven i artikel 2.4 i Europeiska ombudsmannens stadga definitivt kan hindra ombudsmannen frn att snabbt reagera p ett klagoml rrande ett frfarande fr offentlig upphandling.
However, an effective internal complaints mechanism can help to narrow down and clarify the issues to be addressed in the event of a referral to the Ombudsman. 
En effektiv intern klagomlsmekanism kan emellertid bidra till att begrnsa och klargra de frgor som ska hanteras vid en hnvndelse till ombudsmannen.
Recommendation 6 The Ombudsman welcomes the Court's recommendation, that the Commission should propose amendments to the EU Financial Regulation to allow for a rapid review of complaints about public procurement procedures, and that such a review should take place before economic operators may turn to the EU Ombudsman or to the Courts. 
Rekommendation 6 Ombudsmannen vlkomnar domstolens rekommendation att kommissionen br fresl ndringar till EU:s budgetfrordning fr att mjliggra en snabb versyn av klagoml p frfaranden fr offentlig upphandling, och att en sdan versyn br ga rum innan de ekonomiska aktrerna kan vnda sig till EU:s ombudsman eller domstolarna.
The public interest in efficient and speedy administration would be better served by setting up internal review mechanism accessible for tenderers who have concerns about the procurement process. 
Allmnintresset av effektiv och snabb administration skulle tillgodoses bttre om en intern versynsmekanism inrttas fr anbudsgivare som har frgor om upphandlingsfrfarandet.
In the Ombudsman's view, once the institutions, bodies and agencies do have robust internal review mechanisms, the procedural requirement from Article 2.4 of the Statute would have been complied with before any complaint was made to the Ombudsman. 
Nr vl institutioner, organ och byrer har infrt kraftfulla interna system fr versyn anser ombudsmannen att procedurkraven i artikel 2.4 i stadgan br ha uppfyllts innan ett klagoml lmnas till ombudsmannen.
In fact, if the internal mechanism itself were truly effective, the need to complain to the Ombudsman would be avoided. 
Om den interna mekanismen i sig verkligen vore effektiv skulle behovet av klagoml till ombudsmannen inte uppst.
In taking this work forward, the Ombudsman would be willing to offer advice and assistance on the design of an effective complaint mechanism based on our extensive experience. 
I anslutning till det fortsatta arbetet r ombudsmannen beredd att erbjuda rd och std vid utformningen av en effektiv klagomlsmekanism baserad p vr omfattande erfarenhet.
1 European Parliament decision 94/262 of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties, OJ 1994, L 113/15. 
1 Europaparlamentets beslut 94/262/EKSG, EG, Euratom av den 9 mars 1994 om freskrifter och allmnna villkor fr ombudsmannens mbetsutvning, EGT 1994 L 113, s.
Event Date Adoption of the Audit Planning Memorandum/Start of audit 10.2.2015 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 31.3.2016 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 24.5.2016 Commission’s (or other auditee’s) official replies received in all languages EP: 23.5.2016 Council: 3.6.2016 EC: 14.6.2016 ECB: 27.5.2016 Ombudsman: 11.5.2016 
Hndelse Datum Revisionsplanen antas/Revisionen inleds 10.2.2015 Den preliminra rapporten skickas till kommissionen (eller till ett annat revisionsobjekt) 31.3.2016 Den slutliga rapporten antas efter det kontradiktoriska frfarandet 24.5.2016 Svaren frn kommissionen (eller frn ett annat revisionsobjekt) har tagits emot p alla sprk Kommissionen: 14.6.2016 Parlamentet: 23.5.2016 Rdet: 3.6.2016 ECB: 27.5.2016 Ombudsmannen: 11.5.2016
EU institutions procurement rules are broadly in line with the general EU legislation on public procurement which requires putting procurement contracts out to tender on the broadest possible basis to maximise competition. 
EU-institutionernas upphandlingsregler verensstmmer i stora drag med EU:s allmnna lagstiftning om offentlig upphandling som anger att upphandlingskontrakt ska utlysas med s brett deltagande som mjligt fr att mjliggra strsta mjliga konkurrens.
The management and control arrangements of the EU institutions are robust and in general mitigate the risk of errors. 
De frvaltnings-och kontrollarrangemang som EU-institutionerna till-lmpar r robusta och minskar i allmnhet risken fr fel.
We found however that EU institutions can do more to facilitate access of economic operators (especially of small and medium-sized enterprises) for example by simplifying the rules to the fullest possible extent and by removing unnecessary hurdles which make life difficult for potential tenderers who want to identify procurement opportunities offered by the EU institutions. EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Vi konstaterade dock att EUĐinstitutionerna kan gra mer fr att underltta tilltrdet fr ekonomiska operatrer (srskilt sm och medelstora fretag) genom att till exempel frenkla reglerna s mycket som mjligt och ta bort ondiga hinder som gr det svrare fr potentiella anbudsgivare som vill hitta mjligheter att delta i EU institutionernas upphandlingar. EUROPEISKA REVISIONSRTTEN
EN 2016 Special Report NO 18 The EU system for the certification of sustainable biofuels EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
SV 2016 Särskild rapport nr 18 EU:s system för certifiering av hållbara biodrivmedel EUROPEISKA REVISIONSRÄTTEN
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-5249-4 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-5283-8 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-5238-8 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/317613 doi:10.2865/82411 doi:10.2865/165815 QJ-AB-16-017-EN-C QJ-AB-16-017-EN-N QJ-AB-16-017-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxemburg: Europeiska unionens publikationsbyrå, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-5251-7 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-5275-3 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-5231-9 ISSN2 1831-0990 ISSN2 1977-5830 ISSN 1977-5830 doi:10.2865/76903 doi:10.2865/09453 doi:10.2865/87252 QJ-AB-16-017-SV-C QJ-AB-16-017-SV-N QJ-AB-16-017-SV-E © Europeiska unionen, 2016 Kopiering tillåten med angivande av källan. Printed in Luxembourg
EN 2016 Special Report NO 18 The EU system for the certification of sustainable biofuels (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
SV 2016 Särskild rapport nr 18 EU:s system för certifiering av hållbara biodrivmedel (i enlighet med artikel 287.4 andra stycket i EUF-fördraget)
This performance audit was produced by Audit Chamber I — headed by ECA Member Kersti Kaljulaid — which specialises in preservation and management of natural resources spending areas. 
Denna effektivitetsrevision utfördes av revisionsavdelning I – där ledamoten Kersti Kaljulaid är ordförande – som är specialiserad på utgiftsområdena bevarande och förvaltning av naturresurser.
The audit was led by ECA Member Jan Kinšt, then taken over by ECA Member Bettina Jakobsen at the final stage of the report,supported by Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Head of his private office; Bernard Moya, private office Attaché; Davide Lingua, Principal Manager; Krzysztof Zalega, Head of Task; and Paul Toulet-Morlane, Joao Nuno Coelho Dos Santos, Felipe Andres Miguelez, Zoltan Papp and Paivi Piki, Auditors. 
Revisionsarbetet leddes av ledamoten Jan Kinšt, och därefter av ledamoten Bettina Jakobsen i slutskedet av rapporten. De fick stöd av Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, (chef vid Jan Kinšts kansli), Bernard Moya (attaché), Davide Lingua (förstechef), Krzysztof Zalega (uppgiftsansvarig) och Paul Toulet-Morlane, Joao Nuno Coelho Dos Santos, Felipe Andres Miguelez, Zoltan Papp och Paivi Piki (revisorer).
From left to right: J. N. Coelho Dos Santos, B. Jakobsen, P. Toulet-Morlane, D. Lingua and A. Ballester Gallardo. 
Från vänster till höger: J. N. Coelho Dos Santos, B. Jakobsen, P. Toulet-Morlane, D. Lingua och A. Ballester Gallardo.