natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In actual fact, for as long as the Court of Justice remained in a renting situation, the advances paid by it were calculated by reference to the rents charged for comparable buildings occupied by the other institutions in the Kirchberg area (2). It was only when the Court of Justice envisaged the purchase of accommodation that the advance payments exceeded the rents charged for comparable premises in the Kirchberg area, in such a way as to correspond to the appropriations granted by the Budgetary Authority. 
I sjlva verket frhll det sig s, att s lnge domstolen hade fr avsikt att hyra, betalade den frskott med hnvisning till de andra institutionernas hyror fr jmfrbara byggnader p Kirchbergplatn (2). Det var frst nr domstolen rknade med att kpa fastigheterna som frskotten versteg hyrorna fr jmfrbara byggnader p Kirchbergplatn och verensstmde med budgetmyndighetens anslag.
The Court of Auditors also states in paragraph 11 that the advances were not fixed on the basis of a prior, bilaterally negotiated assessment of the true costs of each of the buildings. 
I samma punkt anger revisionsrtten att frskotten inte faststlldes utifrn en frhandsvrdering av de faktiska kostnaderna fr varje byggnad och efter ett samrd mellan de berrda parterna.
However, for as long as the parties were in a lessor/lessee situation, the Court of Justice, as a mere lessee, was not in a position to require information as to the total construction cost and the financial arrangements adopted by the Luxembourg authorities, particularly as (2) See, in particular, the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors concerning the financial year 1987, point 10.50 (OJ C 316, 12.12.1988, p. 1). 
S lnge parterna var instllda p uthyrning kunde domstolen, i egenskap av hyresgst, emellertid inte krva att den skulle underrttas om de totala byggkostnaderna och de ekonomiska villkor som de luxemburgska myndigheterna hade faststllt, srskilt vad (2) Se srskilt revisionsrttens rsrapport fr budgetret 1987, punkt 10.50 (EGT C 316, 12.12.1988, s. 1).
14.4.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 109/11 regards the period of amortisation of the capital sums invested (1). 
14.4.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 109/11 gller amorteringstiden fr investerat kapital (1).
As a lessee, it sought to negotiate an acceptable rent. 
I egenskap av hyresgst vinnlade domstolen sig om att frhandla fram en acceptabel hyra.
It was legitimately entitled to assume that the host country would choose an adequate amortisation period and that the amount of the rent would remain reasonable and at a level commensurate with that which a Community institution may expect from a host country which is seeking to develop a policy of providing seats for international organisations. 
Det var berttigat av domstolen att frutstta att vrdlandet skulle faststlla en tillrcklig amorteringstid och att hyran skulle frbli sklig och verensstmma med vad en gemenskapsinstitution kan frvnta sig av ett vrdland som r mnt om att utveckla en policy ifrga om institutionernas sten.
In those circumstances, the Financial Controller felt obliged to approve the proposals for expenditure commitments and the corresponding payment orders in respect of those advances. 
Det var under dessa omstndigheter som styrekonomen godknde frslagen till taganden och motsvarande betalningsorder avseende dessa frskott.
The relations between the Court of Justice and the Budgetary Authority At paragraph 4 of its report, the Court of Auditors expresses the criticism that the Budgetary Authority was not provided with prior information and that no prior authorisation was given for the conclusion of contracts in respect of premises, of whatever kind (renting, purchase or lease-option). 
Kontakterna mellan domstolen och budgetmyndigheten I punkt 4 i rapporten kritiserar revisionsrtten att budgetmyndigheten inte informerades p frhand och att avtalen angende fastigheterna inte hade godknts p frhand, oavsett syftet med avtalen (hyra, kp eller hyrkp).
The question of the involvement of the Budgetary Authority in decisions of the Court of Justice in regard to premises arose in different ways, depending on whether those decisions related to renting or purchasing. Consequently, a distinction must be drawn between straightforward lettings (see point 3.1) and the lease-option agreement concluded in 1994 (see point 3.2). 
Eftersom budgetmyndighetens roll i frhllande till domstolens fastighetsbeslut inte var detsamma nr det gllde hyra som nr det gllde kp br det gras tskillnad mellan de rena hyresavtalen (3.1) och den verenskommelse om hyrkp som slts 1994 (3.2).
3.1. 
3.1 De rena hyresavtalen Budgetmyndigheten informerades om domstolens avsikt att utnyttja de nya lokalerna ssom hyresgst (3.1.1) och den beviljade ven de ndvndiga anslagen fr att tcka hyreskostnaderna (3.1.2).
Information regarding the intention of the Court of Justice to occupy the new premises as a lessee, and the consequences arising from this At the beginning of 1979 the Court of Justice made the Budgetary Authority aware of its accommodation requirements; the Council then entered additional appropriations in the budget of the Court of Justice for the financial year 1980, with a view to the renting of additional offices. 
3.1.1 Information om domstolens avsikt att utnyttja de nya lokalerna ssom hyresgst och konsekvenserna av detta Redan i brjan av 1979 gjorde domstolen budgetmyndigheten uppmrksam p behovet av byggnader. I domstolens budget fr budgetret 1980 avsatte rdet drfr ytterligare anslag till hyra av fler kontor.
(1) There was, moreover, nothing extraordinary about the fact that the Court of Justice was ignorant of the financial arrangements of the owners of the rented premises, particularly as regards amortisation of the capital invested, as is apparent from the answer given by Mr Burke on behalf of the Commission to a question from Mr Tyrell, a Member of the European Parliament (Written question No 2039/83 (OJ C 194 23.7.1984, p. 
(1) Att domstolen inte knde till de finansiella villkor som faststllts av garna till de uthyrda fastigheterna vad gller bland annat amorteringen av det investerade kapitalet var fr vrigt inte ngot mrkligt, vilket framgr av det svar Richard Burke gav  kommissionens vgnar p en frga av Alan Tyrell, ledamot i Europaparlamentet (skriftlig frga nr 2039/83, EGT C 194, 23.07.1984, s.
With respect to the same financial year, the Council also granted appropriations for the financing of studies concerning the possibility of accommodating certain departments of the Court of Justice in a building to be constructed in the immediate vicinity of the Palais. 
Under samma budgetr beviljade rdet ven anslag fr underskningar av mjligheten att inhysa vissa av domstolens avdelningar i en byggnad som skulle uppfras i Palais-byggnadens omedelbara nrhet.
Subsequently, in May 1984 (see letters from the President of the Court of Justice to the President of the Council and from the Registrar to the Chairman of the Permanent Representatives Committee and to the Chairwoman of the CouncilŐs Budgetary Policy Committee), the Council was informed of the Court of JusticeŐs intention to rent an annexe to be constructed. 
Senare, i maj 1984 (skrivelser frn domstolens ordfrande till rdets ordfrande och frn justitiesekreteraren till ordfranden fr stndiga representanternas kommitt och ordfranden fr rdets budgetkommitt), informerades rdet om domstolens avsikt att hyra ett annex som skulle uppfras.
The Council indicated its agreement to this. Although that letting was special in that the context was that of a building to be constructed in order to meet the specific requirements of the Court of Justice, the Budgetary Authority could not have been under any misapprehension as to the intention of the Court of Justice to rent that building. 
Rdet gav sitt samtycke. ven om uthyrningen av annexet var speciell p det sttet att den var avsedd att ske inom ramen fr en byggnad som skulle uppfras med hnsyn till domstolens specifika behov, kunde budgetmyndigheten inte ta miste p att domstolens avsikt var att hyra denna byggnad.
That intention was clearly indicated in the letters sent by the Court of Justice and, later on, in the Luxembourg Financing Law of 1985 authorising the construction of the first annexe, in which those offices were to be located. 
Denna avsikt framgick tydligt av domstolens skrivelser och senare av den luxemburgska lagen om finansiering frn 1985, genom vilken uppfrandet av det frsta annexet fr dessa kontor godkndes.
That law stated that Ôthe best way of achieving the proposed extension within a short space of time was for the Luxembourg Government to construct an annexe to the Palais of the Court of Justice, to be let to the Court, like the Palais itself, once it was completedŐ. 
I denna lag angavs att Ódet bsta sttet att p kort tid mjliggra den planerade utbyggnaden r att den luxemburgska regeringen uppfr ett annex till domstolens Palais-byggnad, vilket Đ i likhet med den nuvarande Palais-byggnaden Đ kommer att uthyras till domstolen efter uppfrandetÓ.
The Council was also informed of the Court of JusticeŐs view that the renting option was not to result in any increase in its budget within the immediate future and of the Court of JusticeŐs intention of approaching the Budgetary Authority as soon as any increase in the budget proved to be necessary on account of changes in its requirements. 
Rdet informerades ven om domstolens bedmning att hyresavtal inte skulle leda till en omedelbar kning av domstolens budget och att domstolen hade fr avsikt att vnda sig till budgetmyndigheten nr en budgetkning skulle visa sig ndvndig p grund av vxande behov.
The view expressed by the Court of Justice was based on the consideration that the costs of renting the first annexe would be covered in the immediate future by the appropriations granted for the renting of offices outside the Palais. 
Domstolens bedmning var grundad p att de omedelbara hyreskostnaderna fr det frsta annexet tcktes av de anslag som beviljats fr hyra av kontor utanfr Palais-byggnaden.
At no time did the Court of Justice conceal the fact that its budget resources would have to be adjusted to meet its accommodation requirements, which were constantly and rapidly evolving. 
Domstolen har aldrig dolt det faktum att dess budgetmedel mste anpassas efter dess konstant och snabbt vxande behov av byggnader.
3.1.2. 
3.1.2 Budgetmyndigheten beviljade de anslag som krvdes fr att tcka hyreskostnaderna Vid utarbetandet av den rliga budgeten beviljade budgetmyndigheten de anslag som krvdes fr att tcka utgifterna fr hyra av byggnaderna (3.1.2.1).
3.1.2. 
Budgetmyndigheten informerades ven om domstolens flerrsprognoser s det fanns ett lmpligt forum fr detta (3.1.2.2).
3.1.2. The involvement of the Budgetary Authority in the drawing up of the annual budget Where increased appropriations proved necessary in order to meet the costs arising from existing or planned lettings, the Budgetary Authority was invariably given due notice to that effect, within the context of the drawing up of the annual budget. 
3.1.2.1 Budgetmyndighetens roll i utarbetandet av den rliga budgeten Nr en kning av anslagen har framsttt som ndvndig fr att bestrida aktuella eller planerade hyreskostnader har budgetmyndigheten alltid informerats i vederbrlig ordning vid utarbetandet av den rliga budgeten.
C 109/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 14.4.2000 Budgetary Authority with a view to covering rental costs were the subject, throughout the period under consideration, of systematic and thorough discussion within the Budgetary Committee of the Council and the Committee on Budgets of the European Parliament, on the occasion of the examination of each draft budget submitted by the institution. 
Domstolens dokumenterade anskningar till budgetmyndigheten om budgetanslag fr att tcka hyreskostnaderna blev under hela C 109/12 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 14.4.2000 den aktuella perioden regelmssigt freml fr grundliga diskussioner inom rdets budgetkommitt och Europaparlamentets budgetutskott vid behandlingen av institutionens frslag till budget.
Up until 1997, the Budgetary Committee of the Council carried out an examination of each heading of the draft budget, and the heading entitled ÔRentŐ generally gave rise to detailed debate, particularly between the representative of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the representatives of the other Member States. As regards, more particularly, the first financial year during which the cost of renting the first annexe was incurred (1988), the estimates showed, under heading 200 (ÔRentŐ), the amount needed for Ôrent of the new annexe to the Court building for four months, less the rent of the Jean Monnet building for the same periodŐ. 
Fram till 1997 gjorde rdets budgetkommitt en prvning av varje enskild post i frslaget till budget. Posten ÓHyrorÓ gav i allmnhet upphov till grundliga diskussioner, i synnerhet mellan fretrdaren fr Storhertigdmet Luxemburg och fretrdarna fr vriga medlemsstater. Vad srskilt betrffar det frsta budgetr under vilket hyresutgifter fr det frsta annexet togs upp, nmligen budgetret 1988, innehll domstolens utgiftsberkning under posten 200, ÓHyrorÓ, det belopp som krvdes fr hyra Óunder fyra mnader av det nya annexet till Palais, efter avdrag fr motsvarande hyra fr byggnaden ŐJean MonnetŐ under denna periodÓ.
The fact that the appropriations in question were granted can be taken to signify the agreement of the Budgetary Authority to the renting of that first annexe. 
Att dessa anslag beviljades kan ses som att budgetmyndigheten samtyckte till att domstolen hyrde det frsta annexet.
The Budgetary Authority had received a request for appropriations in the spring of 1987, and had had the opportunity to express its comments throughout the course of the procedure for approval of the 1988 budget. 
Under vren 1987 ingavs en anskan om anslag till budgetmyndigheten som fick tillflle att kommentera denna under hela budgetprocessen fr budgetret 1988.
Thus, the resolution of the European Parliament on the draft budget for 1988 notes that Ôthe occupation by the Court of its new annexe, the floor area of which is the same as that of its current premises, will inevitably lead to a significant increase in its financial require-mentsŐ and the Rapporteur proposes that Ôthe expenditure connected with the occupation of its new building by the Court of Justice should be covered by the allocation of adequate fundsŐ. 
Det r av den anledningen som det i Europaparlamentets resolution om frslaget till budget fr budgetret 1988 anges att Ódomstolens utnyttjande av det nya annexet, vars yta r densamma som fr domstolens nuvarande lokaler, kommer oundvikligen att medfra en avsevrd kning av domstolens ekonomiska behovÓ och referenten freslog Óett anslag som r tillrckligt fr att tcka utgifterna fr att utnyttja domstolens nya byggnadÓ.
3.1.2.2. The information provided to the Budgetary Authority within the framework of multiannual estimates Despite the absence of any appropriate framework for the submission of multiannual budget estimates, the Court of Justice kept the Council constantly informed of the foreseeable course of its development and of its accommodation requirements, having regard, in particular, to the increase in its workload, the successive enlargements of the Community, the extension of its jurisdiction, the creation of the Court of First Instance and the growth in the number of staff. 
3.1.2.2 Information till budgetmyndigheten genom flerrsprognoser Trots att det inte fanns ngot lmpligt forum fr att redovisa budgetprognoserna fr flera r framt informerade domstolen kontinuerligt rdet om domstolens frutsebara utveckling och dess behov av lokaler i synnerhet med tanke p den kande arbetsbrdan, gemenskapens successiva utvidgning, domstolens utvidgade behrighet, inrttandet av frstainstansrtten och kningen av antalet anstllda.
When, following a decision of the Group of the Heads of Administration, the appropriate framework for the submission of multiannual budget estimates of administrative expenditure was set up in 1988, the Court of Justice, like the other institutions, submitted such estimates, including those relating to expenditure on rent over the period from 1989 to 1992, to the Budgetary Authority. 
Nr det 1988, efter beslut av frvaltningschefskollegiet, infrdes ett lmpligt forum fr att redovisa flerriga budgetprognoser fr administrativa utgifter, ingav domstolen, i likhet med andra institutioner, sdana prognoser till budgetmyndigheten. Bland annat lmnades prognoserna fr hyresutgifter under perioden 1989Đ1992.
Those estimates were accepted by the Budgetary Authority on the basis of a communication from the Commission. They did not, however, prompt the Budgetary Authority to establish a multiannual investment budget endowed with differentiated appropriations. 
Budgetmyndigheten godknde dessa prognoser p grundval av ett meddelande frn kommissionen, men detta ledde inte till upprttandet av en flerrig investeringsbudget med separata anslag.
3.2. The lease-option agreement of 1994 In 1979 the Court of Auditors published a report recommending that premises occupied by the Community institutions should be purchased rather than leased. 
3.2 verenskommelsen om hyrkp frn 1994 1979 offentliggjorde revisionsrtten en rapport dr man frordade kp framfr hyra av de byggnader som gemenskapsinstitutioner utnyttjar.
In 1981 the Council stated that it was not opposed in principle to the purchase of premises by the institutions. 
1981 tillknnagav rdet att det i princip inte har ngot emot att institutionerna kper byggnader.
However, as noted by the Court of Auditors, the Council refused, as budgetary authority, Ôto provide the necessary financial resourcesŐ for the purchase of premises (Council Decision of 14 December 1981, cited in points 10.62 to 10.66 of the Court of AuditorsŐ Annual Report concerning the financial year 1987 (OJ C 316, 12.12.1988, p. 
Som revisionsrtten har ppekat vgrade dock rdet i egenskap av budgetmyndighet att Ótillhandahlla ndvndigt kapitalÓ fr kp av byggnaderna (rdets beslut av den 14 december 1981, vilket nmns i punkterna 10.62Đ10.66 i revisionsrttens rsrapport fr budgetret 1987, EGT C 316, 12.12.1988, s.
In July 1990 the Rapporteur of the Committee on Budgets of the European Parliament contemplated, in the context of that committeeŐs examination of the 1991 budget of the Court of Justice, the entry in that budget of the appropriations needed for the purchase of the Palais and Erasmus buildings. 
Fredraganden i Europaparlamentets budgetutskott fr domstolens budget fr 1991 ansg i juli 1990 att i domstolens budget fr 1991 budgetera de ndvndiga anslagen fr kp av Palais-och Erasmus-byggnaderna. Dessa frsk var dock fruktlsa.
However, that idea never bore fruit, since, despite the wording of Resolution A3-360/90 of the European Parliament, the appropriations entered in the 1991 budget were only those intended to cover the rent for the two buildings in question. 
Trots Europaparlamentets resolution A3Đ360/90 upptogs i budgeten fr 1991 endast budgeterade anslag fr att tcka hyrorna fr de tv byggnaderna.
Although the construction of Annexes A, B and C had taken place with a view to the conclusion of a lease, and while the Court of Justice was persevering with its attempts to obtain the host countryŐs agreement to a reasonable rent, the new circumstances described above prompted the Court of Justice to contemplate the inclusion of a purchase option in the lease under discussion. 
Vid uppfrandet av annexen A, B och C var avsikten att upprtta ett hyreskontrakt och domstolen fortsatte sina frsk att n en verenskommelse med vrdlandet om en sklig hyra, men den nya situationen medfrde att domstolen vervgde att infra en kpoption i det hyresavtal som diskuterades.
In 1992, as indicated above, the Budgetary Authority established a policy in the matter of premises which unequivocally advocated the purchase by the institutions of the buildings occupied or to be occupied by them. 
Ssom har angetts ovan faststllde budgetmyndigheten 1992 en fastighetspolitik som klart fresprkar att institutionerna skall kpa de byggnader som de utnyttjar eller skulle komma att utnyttja.
The consolidation of that new policy of the Community institutions with respect to premises and the increasingly favourable reception given by the Budgetary Authority to the idea of purchasing Annexes A, B and C, coupled with the Luxembourg authoritiesŐ wish to calculate the rent on the basis of amortisation of the capital sums invested over a 20-year period, speeded up the negotiation of an agreement by which the payment of rent was to be combined with the deferred purchase of the buildings. 
Bekrftandet av gemenskapsinstitutionernas nya fastighetspolitik, budgetmyndighetens alltmer positiva instllning till frslaget att kpa annexen A, B och C, frenat med de luxemburgska myndigheternas lften om att hyran skulle berknas p grundval av en tjugorig amorteringstid fr det investerade kapitalet, pskyndade frhandlingarna om en verenskommelse som kombinerade hyra av byggnaderna med ett framtida kp.
That change in approach led to increased contact between the Court of Justice and the two branches of the Budgetary Authority. 
Den ndrade instllningen medfrde ett kat meningsutbyte mellan domstolen och budgetmyndighetens tv grenar.
The Budgetary Authority was of course duly informed that an agreement was being negotiated with the Luxembourg authorities; indeed, it decided in 1994, by way of a supplementary and amending budget, to allocate the sum of ECU 9,476 million to the Court of Justice before the end of the current financial year, with a view to Ôpartially covering the difference between the rent demanded by the Luxembourg State for the CourtŐs new complex of buildings, on the basis of a lease incorporating a purchase option, and the amount which can be paid under the budget of the institutionŐ. 
Budgetmyndigheten informerades naturligtvis i vederbrlig ordning om att frhandlingar pgick med de luxemburgska myndigheterna om en verenskommelse och 1994 beslutade den att genom en tillggs-och ndringsbudget ansl 9,476 miljoner ecu till domstolen fre utgngen av det innevarande budgetret fr att Ódelvis tcka skillnaden mellan de hyror som den luxemburgska staten begrt fr domstolens nya fastighetskomplex, grundade p ett hyresavtal med kpoption, och det belopp som institutionens budget mjliggjort att betalaÓ.
Since the use of those appropriations presupposed the conclusion of a lease containing a purchase option, the European Communities, represented by the Court of Justice, and the Luxembourg State signed a lease-option agreement on 15 November 1994, following several years of negotiations. The text of the lease-option agreement was communicated to the Budgetary Authority. 
Eftersom anvndningen av dessa anslag frutsatte att man ingick ett hyresavtal med kpoption undertecknade Europeiska gemenskaperna, fretrdda av domstolen, och den luxemburgska staten den 15 november 1994 en verenskommelse om hyrkp efter flera rs frhandlingar. verenskommelsen om hyrkp versndes till budgetmyndigheten.
14.4.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 109/13 In 1996 the Budgetary Authority requested and obtained from the Court of Auditors a technical opinion concerning the financial commitments governing the premises of the Court of Justice. 
14.4.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 109/13 1996 fick budgetmyndigheten p begran ett tekniskt utltande frn revisionsrtten rrande de ekonomiska tagandena fr domstolens byggnader.