natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the Commission, by the end of 2017 the Agency had introduced e-invoicing and e-tendering for certain procedures, but not e-submission. 
Enligt kommissionen hade byrn i slutet av 2017 infrt e-fakturering och e-upphandling fr vissa frfaranden, men inte e-inlmning.
(235) Pursuant to Article 75(13) of its Founding Regulation (236) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1271/2013, Article79 e-Government. 
(235) I enlighet med artikel 75.13 i byrns inrttandefrordning. (236) Artikel 79, e-frvaltning, i kommissionens delegerade frordning (EU) nr 1271/2013.
(237) Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012, Article 95(2) e-Government. 
(237) Artikel 95.2, e-Frvaltning, i frordning (EU, Euratom) nr 966/2012.
EN C 434/176 Official Journal of the European Union 30.11.2018 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS YEARSŐ OBSERVATIONS 3.30.21. 
SV C 434/176 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 30.11.2018 UPPF LJNING AV TIDIGARE RS IAKTTAGELSER 3.30.21.
An overview of the corrective actions taken in response to the Court's observations from previous years is provided in the Annex. 30.11.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 434/177 EN Year 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2015 Status of corrective action (Completed / Ongoing / Outstanding / N/A) Ongoing Completed Ongoing for ex ante and ex post Completed for audit certificates Ongoing (2) Completed Ongoing ANNEX Follow-up of previous yearsŐ observations Court's observations SuppliersŐ statements at year-end were reconciled with considerable difficulty. 
En versikt ver de korrigerande tgrder som har vidtagits som en reaktion p revisionsrttens iakttagelser frn tidigare r finns i bilagan. 30.11.2018 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 434/177 SV r 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2015 Genomfrande av korrigerande tgrder (Har genomfrts/Pgr/Har inte genomfrts/Ej tillmpligt) Pgr Har genomfrts Pgr nr det gller frhands-och efterhandskontrollerna Har genomfrts nr det gller revisionsintyg Pgr (2) Har genomfrts Pgr BILAGA Uppfljning av tidigare rs iakttagelser Revisionsrttens iakttagelser Det var mycket svrt att stmma av leverantrernas uppgifter vid bokslutet.
There is a need to monitor supplier balances more regularly and to analyse differences in a more timely manner. 
Leverantrernas saldon behver vervakas mer regelbundet och eventuella differenser analyseras snabbare.
Frontex became operational in 2005 and has, to date, worked on the basis of correspondence and exchanges with the host Member State. 
Byrn inledde sin verksamhet 2005 och har hittills arbetat p grundval av korrespondens och utbyten med vrdmedlemsstaten.
However a comprehensive headquarters agreement between the Agency and the Member State has not been signed. Such an agreement would further promote transparency in respect of the conditions under which the Agency and its staff operate. 
Men det finns ingen vergripande verenskommelse mellan byrn och medlemsstaten om ett huvudkontor. En sdan verenskommelse skulle ge kad insyn i de villkor som gller fr byrn och dess personal.
However, documentation from cooperating countries supporting the expenditure claimed is not always sufficient. 
Den dokumentation frn samarbetslnderna som styrker de kostnader som de begr ersttning fr r dock inte alltid tillrcklig.
Moreover, no audit certificates were requested, although the rules of application of the EUŐs Financial Regulation recommend this for grants above specific thresholds (1). 
Vidare begrde man inga revisionsintyg trots att det rekommenderas i tillmpningsfreskrifterna fr EU:s budgetfrordning fr bidrag ver srskilda trskelvrden (1).
The high and constantly increasing number of grant agreements and the magnitude of related expenditure to be verified and reimbursed by Frontex raise the question whether more efficient and cost-effective alternative funding mechanisms could be used. 
Det stora och stndigt kande antalet bidragsverenskommelser och omfattningen av motsvarande kostnader som ska kontrolleras och ersttas av Frontex vcker frgan om man inte skulle kunna anvnda mer effektiva och kostnadseffektiva alternativa finansieringsmekanismer.
There is a need to refine the calculation of contributions from Schengen associated countries (Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Iceland and Norway) to better reflect the related legal provisions(3). 
Berkningen av bidrag frn Schengenassocierade lnder (Schweiz, Liechtenstein, Island och Norge) behver finjusteras s att den bttre speglar motsvarande rttsliga bestmmelser(3).
For example, the calculation should be based on the final instead of the budgeted annual subsidy received from the Commission. 
Till exempel br berkningen bygga p det slutliga och inte det budgeterade rliga bidraget frn kommissionen.
The ex post audit to Iceland carried out by the Agency in October 2015 detected irregular payments totalling 1,4 million euros related to the depreciation of a vessel participating in seven joint operations from 2011 to 2015. 
Vid den efterhandsrevision som byrn genomfrde p Island i oktober 2015 upptckte den oriktiga betalningar p totalt 1,4 miljoner euro som gllde avskrivningen av ett fartyg som hade deltagit i sju gemensamma insatser mellan 2011 och 2015.
Whilst the Agency has the right to recover irregular payments made in the last five years, it announced to recover only the payments made since January 2015, amounting to 0,6 million euros. 
Trots att byrn har rtt att terkrva felaktiga betalningar som gjorts under de senaste fem ren meddelade den att den endast kommer att terkrva de betalningar som har gjorts sedan januari 2015, som uppgr till 0,6 miljoner euro.
C 434/178 Official Journal of the European Union 30.11.2018 EN Court's observations The Internal Security Fund (ISF) is set up for the period 2014-20. 
C 434/178 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 30.11.2018 SV Revisionsrttens iakttagelser Fonden fr inre skerhet (ISF) har inrttats fr perioden 2014Đ2020.
It is composed of two instruments, ISF Borders and Visa as well as ISF Police, under which 2,8 billion euros and 1 billion euros are available for funding actions respectively. 
Den bestr av tv instrument, ISF Đ grnser och viseringar och ISF Đ Polis, inom vilka 2,8 miljarder respektive en miljard euro finns tillgngliga fr finansiering av tgrder.
The Commission under ISF Borders and Visa reimburses Member StatesŐ purchases of means, such as vehicles or vessels as well as running costs such as fuel consumption or maintenance. 
Inom ISF Đ grnser och viseringar erstter kommissionen medlemsstaternas inkp av transportmedel, som fordon eller fartyg, och ven lpande kostnader som brnslefrbrukning eller underhll.
The Agency also reimburses such costs to participants in joint operations. 
Byrn erstter ocks sdana kostnader fr dem som deltar i gemensamma insatser.
There is therefore an unaddressed risk of double funding (4). 
Det finns drmed en risk fr dubbelfinansiering som inte har tgrdats (4).
States participating in border operations declare the costs incurred on the basis of cost claim sheets which comprise Ôfixed expensesŐ (depreciation and maintenance), Ôvariable expensesŐ (mostly fuel) and Ômission expensesŐ (mostly allowances and other crew expenses). 
Stater som deltar i grnsinsatser redovisar de kostnader som de har haft p srskilda blad fr ersttningsansprk som har rubrikerna Ófasta kostnaderÓ (avskrivningar och underhll), Órrliga kostnaderÓ (frmst brnsle) och Ókostnader fr tjnsteresorÓ (frmst traktamenten och andra kostnader fr besttningen).
The costs declared are based on real values and follow national standards leading to divergent approaches among participating states which creates a particularly burdensome system for all parties involved. 
De redovisade kostnaderna grundar sig p verkliga vrden och fljer nationella standarder, vilket leder till att de deltagande staterna har olika tillvgagngsstt, vilket i sin tur skapar ett krngligt system fr alla berrda parter.
The Court in its Special Report 12/2016 recommended that agencies should use simplified cost options whenever appropriate to avoid such inefficiencies (5). 
I srskild rapport nr 12/2016 rekommenderade revisionsrtten att byrerna br utnyttja de frenklade kostnadsalternativen nr det r lmpligt fr att undvika sdan ineffektivitet (5).
The AgencyŐs previous founding Regulation which was in force until 5 October 2016 provided for the funding of joint return operations carried out with participating countries. 
Byrns tidigare inrttandefrordning, som var i kraft till den 5 oktober 2016, innehll bestmmelser om finansiering av gemensamma tervndandeinsatser som genomfrdes av deltagande lnder.
National return operations only became eligible under the new founding Regulation. 
Nationella tervndandeinsatser blev stdberttigande frst i och med den nya inrttandefrordningen.
However, in the period January to October 2016 the Agency funded national return operations for an amount of 3,6 million euros. 
Under perioden januari till oktober 2016 finansierade emellertid byrn nationella tervndandeinsatser till ett belopp av 3,6 miljoner euro.
These payments are irregular. 
Dessa betalningar r oriktiga.
The Staff Regulations provide that in the case of an external selection procedure, temporary staff can only be recruited at grades SC 1 to SC 2, AST 1 to AST 4 or AD 5 to AD 8(6). 
Vid ett externt urvalsfrfarande ska enligt tjnstefreskrifterna tillflligt anstllda anstllas enbart i lnegraderna SC 1ĐSC 2, AST 1ĐAST 4 eller AD 5ĐAD 8(6).
In 2016 the Agency recruited 14 staff at higher AST grades. 
Under 2016 anstllde byrn 14 anstllda i hgre AST-lnegrader.
The level of carry-overs for committed appropriations increased for Title II (administrative expenditure) to 6,4 million euros, i.e. 43 % (2015: 3,2 million euros, i.e. 38%) and Title III (operational expenditure) to 67,3 million euros, i.e. 37% (2015: 40,2 million euros, i.e. 35 %). 
Rekryteringarna till dessa lnegrader r oriktiga. Andelen verfringar av gjorda taganden kade inom avdelning II (administrativa utgifter) till 6,4 miljoner euro eller 43% (2015: 3,2 miljoner euro eller 38 %) och inom avdelning III (driftsutgifter) till 67,3 miljoner euro eller 37 % (2015: 40,2 miljoner euro eller 35 %).
The main reason is contracts and operations extending beyond the year-end. 
Huvudsklet till det r kontrakt och insatser som strckte sig lngre n till rets slut.
30.11.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 434/179 EN Court's observations The level of cancelled carry-overs from 2015 was high for Title III (operational expenditure) at 6,4 million euros, i.e. 16 %, due to an overestimation of 2015 costs that still had to be reimbursed to participating countries in 2016. 
30.11.2018 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 434/179 SV Revisionsrttens iakttagelser Andelen verfrda anslag frn 2015 som frfallit var stor fr avdelning III (driftsutgifter), 6,4 miljoner euro eller 16 %, p grund av att man hade verskattat kostnader fr 2015 som alltjmt mste betalas tillbaka till deltagande lnder 2016.
Under the AgencyŐs extended mandate, high importance is attached to return operations and 63 million euros had been assigned to that in its 2016 budget. 
Byrns utvidgade uppdrag innebr att tervndandeinsatser tillmts stor betydelse. I byrns budget fr 2016 hade 63 miljoner euro anslagits till sdana insatser.
However, 23 million euros, i.e. 37,5 % were repaid to the EU budget since fewer return operations were carried out than envisaged. 
Men 23 miljoner euro eller 37,5% betalades tillbaka till EU-budgeten eftersom frre tervndandeinsatser n planerat genomfrdes.
The significant delay of the procurement procedure for a 50 million euros framework contract to charter aircraft and related services for Frontex return operations contributed to this situation and continues to affect the number of return operations arranged by the Agency. 
Den kraftiga frseningen av upphandlingsfrfarandet fr ett ramavtal p 50 miljoner euro fr att chartra flygplan med tillhrande tjnster fr Frontex tervndandeinsatser bidrog till denna situation och fortstter att pverka det antal tervndandeinsatser som byrn organiserar.
While the launch of this procurement procedure was planned for March 2016, it had not been started by the year end. 
Upphandlingsfrfarandet skulle enligt planerna ha inletts i mars 2016, men det hade inte kommit igng vid rets slut.
On 22 December 2015 the Commission and the Agency, co-beneficiary and coordinator of three other co-beneficiaries (EASO, IOM and UNHCR)(7), signed a grant agreement amounting to 5,5 million euros on regional support to protection-sensitive migration management in the Western Balkans and Turkey for a three year period starting on 1 January 2016. 
Den 22 december 2015 undertecknade kommissionen och byrn, medstdmottagare och samordnare fr tre andra medstdmottagare (Easo, IOM och UNHCR)(7), en bidragsverenskommelse p 5,5 miljoner euro om regionalt std till skyddsinriktad migrationsfrvaltning p vstra Balkan och i Turkiet under en trersperiod med start den 1 januari 2016.
However, cooperation agreements with the three partners (legal commitments) which amounted to 3,4 million euros were only signed between August and November 2016. 
Men samarbetsavtal med de tre partnerna (rttsliga taganden) p 3,4 miljoner euro ingicks inte frrn mellan augusti och november 2016.
For two of the agreements the budgetary commitments, which should have released the funds before entering in the legal commitments, were only signed in October and in December 2016. 
Nr det gller tv av avtalen ingicks budgettagandena, som skulle ha frigjort medlen innan de rttsliga tagandena ingicks, frst i oktober respektive december 2016.
Moreover, budget commitments amounted to 1,2 million euros, covering only the pre-financing payments. 
Dessutom uppgick budgettagandena till 1,2 miljoner euro, vilket endast tckte betalningarna av frfinansieringen.
Such a procedure is in breach of the Financial RegulationŐs rules on budgetary management and the late signature of the agreements caused uncertainty for the operational cooperation between partners. 
Ett sdant frfarande strider mot budgetfrordningens regler fr budgetfrvaltning, och det faktum att avtalen undertecknades sent skapade oskerhet i det operativa samarbetet mellan olika partner.
The AgencyŐs establishment plan for 2016 provides for 275 posts for officials and temporary agents (8) By the end of 2016 only 197 of these posts, i.e. 71 % were filled, mainly due to the fact that 50 new posts were only established in October 2016 and recruitment still has to be completed. 
Byrns tjnstefrteckning fr 2016 innehller 275 tjnster fr tjnstemn och tillflligt anstllda (8). Vid utgngen av 2016 hade endast 197 av dessa tjnster eller 71 % tillsatts, framfr allt p grund av att 50 nya tjnster inrttades s sent som i oktober 2016.
The Agency traditionally experiences difficulties in finding staff with the required profile, partly because of the salary correction coefficient (66,7 %). Year 2016 Status of corrective action (Completed / Ongoing / Outstanding / N/A) Ongoing 2016 N/A 2016 N/A 2016 Ongoing 
Byrn har vanligtvis svrt att hitta personal med rtt profil, delvis p grund av lnekorrigeringskoefficienten (66,7 %). r 2016 Genomfrande av korrigerande tgrder (Har genomfrts/Pgr/Har inte genomfrts/Ej tillmpligt) Pgr 2016 Ej tillmpligt 2016 Ej tillmpligt 2016 Pgr
C 434/180 Official Journal of the European Union 30.11.2018 EN Court's observations Following the extension of its mandate, the AgencyŐs staff will more than double from 365 in 2016 to 1 000 in 2020 (9). 
C 434/180 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 30.11.2018 SV Revisionsrttens iakttagelser Till fljd av utvidgningen av byrns uppdrag kommer personalen mer n att frdubblas, frn 365 r 2016 till 1000 r 2020(9).
This increase was not based on a thorough estimation of needs. 
Denna kning baserades inte p en grundlig behovsbedmning.
The planned increase in staff will require additional office space. 
Den planerade personalkningen kommer att krva ytterligare kontorsutrymme.
The Agency is analysing options to address the needs, together with the Commission and the host country. Year 2016 2016 Status of corrective action (Completed / Ongoing / Outstanding / N/A) N/A Completed (1) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 (OJ L 362, 31.12.2012, p. 
Byrn analyserar fr nrvarande alternativ fr att tillgodose behoven tillsammans med kommissionen och vrdlandet. r 2016 2016 Genomfrande av korrigerande tgrder (Har genomfrts/Pgr/Har inte genomfrts/Ej tillmpligt) Ej tillmpligt Har genomfrts (1) Kommissionens delegerade frordning (EU) nr 1268/2012 (EUT L 362, 31.12.2012, s.
1). (2) Article 3(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 limits the AgencyŐs co-financing of joint operations to grants. 
(2) Artikel 3.4 i frordning (EG) nr 2007/2004 begrnsar byrns medfinansiering av gemensamma insatser till anslag ur dess egen budget.
(3) Arrangement between the European Community of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein, of the other part, on the modalities of the participation by those States in the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (OJ L 243, 16.9.2010, p. 
(3) Avtal mellan Europeiska gemenskapen,  ena sidan, och Schweiziska edsfrbundet och Furstendmet Liechtenstein,  andra sidan, om villkoren fr dessa staters deltagande i Europeiska byrn fr frvaltningen av det operativa samarbetet vid Europeiska unionens medlemsstaters yttre grnser (EUT L 243, 16.9.2010, s.
4); Arrangement between the European Community and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the modalities of the participation by those States in the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (OJ L 188, 20.7.2007, p. 
4) och avtal mellan Europeiska gemenskapen och Republiken Island och Konungariket Norge om villkoren fr dessa staters deltagande i Europeiska byrn fr frvaltningen av det operativa samarbetet vid Europeiska unionens medlemsstaters yttre grnser (EUT L 188, 20.7.2007, s.
(4) The Court had referred to this risk in paragraph 39 and recommendation 4 of its Special Report 15/2014 ÔThe External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added valueŐ. 
(4) Revisionsrtten tog upp denna risk i punkt 39 och rekommendation 4 i sin srskilda rapport nr 15/2014 Fonden fr yttre grnser har frmjat ekonomisk solidaritet, men resultaten behver mtas bttre och fonden behver ge ett strre europeiskt mervrde.
(5) Recommendation 1 in the CourtŐs Special Report 12/2016 ÔAgenciesŐ use of grants: not always appropriate or demonstrably effectiveÓ. 
(5) Rekommendation 1 i revisionsrttens srskilda rapport nr 12/2016 Byrernas finansiering med hjlp av bidrag r inte alltid det bsta valet och man har inte kunnat visa att den finansierade verksamheten r ndamlsenlig.
(6) Article 53.2 of the Staff Regulation. 
(6) Artikel 53.2 i tjnstefreskrifterna.
(7) European Asylum Support Office (Malta), International Organisation for Migration (Belgrade) and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (Geneva). 
(7) Europeiska stdkontoret fr asylfrgor (Malta), Internationella organisationen fr migration (Belgrad) och FN:s flyktingkommissariat (Genve).
(8) Additional 192 posts were authorised for contract staff and seconded national experts. 
(8) Ytterligare 192 tjnster beviljades fr kontraktsanstllda och utstationerade nationella experter.
(9) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, Regulation (EC) No 863/2007 and Council Decision 2005/267/EC (COM/2015/0671 final Ń 2015/ 0310 (COD)). 
(9) Frslag till Europaparlamentets och rdets frordning om en europeisk grns-och kustbevakning och om upphvande av frordning (EG) nr 2007/2004, frordning (EG) nr 863/2007 och rdets beslut 2005/267/EG (COM(2015) 671 final Đ 2015/0310 (COD)).
EN 30.11.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 434/181 THE AGENCYŐS REPLY COMMENTS ON THE LEGALITY AND REGULARITY OF TRANSACTIONS 3.30.10. 
SV 30.11.2018 Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 434/181 BYRNS SVAR KOMMENTARER OM TRANSAKTIONERNAS LAGLIGHET OCH KORREKTHET 3.30.10.
Taking into account the market limitations for the required services in the region (very few economic operators), the most appropriate option identified was to use a Ôbridging contractŐ with the company which was second best in the initial tender procedure for the selection of ferry operators. 
Regionens marknadsmssiga begrnsningar nr det gller de efterfrgade tjnsterna (mycket f ekonomiska aktrer) medfrde att det lmpligaste alternativet var att anvnda ett Óverbryggande kontraktÓ med det fretag som var nst bst i det inledande anbudsfrfarandet fr val av frjeoperatr.
Hence this was not a continuation of already closed tendering procedure. 
Detta var med andra ord inte en fortsttning p det redan avslutade anbudsfrfarandet.
Frontex took into consideration that the company had previous experience in providing ferry services for Frontex with very positive feedback; the ferry proposed met all minimal technical requirements. 
Frontex tog hnsyn till att fretaget hade tidigare erfarenhet av att tillhandahlla frjetjnster till Frontex med mycket positiv feedback, och den freslagna frjan uppfyllde alla tekniska minimikrav.
The contractor was willing to provide the services under the same conditions which were required and offered during the initial tender procedure. 
Entreprenren var villig att tillhandahlla tjnsterna p samma villkor som krvdes och erbjds under det inledande anbudsfrfarandet.
An exception was signed in November 2017 explaining the rationale behind this decision. 
Ett undantag undertecknades i november 2017, dr det frklarades varfr detta beslut fattades.
The bridging contract was signed by both parties in December 2017 and entered into force in January 2018. 
Det verbryggande kontraktet signerades av bda parter i december 2017 och trdde i kraft i januari 2018.
The use of the price criterion as the only criterion was carefully analysed and based on Frontex experience from the last two years of ordering ferries for readmission operations between Greek islands and Turkey. 
Anvndningen av priskriteriet som enda kriterium var ett resultat av noggranna analyser och baserades p Frontex erfarenheter av att bestlla frjor fr verksamheten mellan grekiska ar och Turkiet under de senaste tv ren.
Market limitations in the geographical area Ń only a very limited number of operators available with a narrow offer of ferries Ń rendered the use of qualitative award criteria unsuitable. 
Marknadsmssiga begrnsningar i det geografiska omrdet Đ ett mycket begrnsat antal aktrer med ett litet utbud av frjor Đ gjorde anvndningen av kvalitativa tilldelningskriterier olmplig.
The services which Frontex required were short trips between Greek islands and Turkey to readmit returnees under the readmission agreement between the EU and Turkey, ensuring that those operations were carried out in a safe environment and in full respect of fundamental rights. 
De tjnster som Frontex efterfrgade utgjordes av korta resor mellan grekiska ar och Turkiet fr att terta tervndande enligt tertagandeavtalet mellan EU och Turkiet, och se till att dessa tgrder utfrdes i en sker milj och med full respekt fr de grundlggande rttigheterna.