natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where appropriate the Commission has established a list of minimum standards for each type of inspection to be used by Member States and suggested guidelines to follow. 
Nr detta r lmpligt har kommissionen upprttat en frteckning ver minimistandarder fr varje typ av inspektion som ska anvndas av medlemsstaterna samt frslag till riktlinjer.
Nevertheless, the Commission considers it appropriate to define certain general rules for inspection procedures (format for inspection reports, inspection procedure, vademecum for follow up of infringe-ments), which will effectively contribute to a level playing field. 
Kommissionen anser dock att det r lmpligt att ange vissa allmnna bestmmelser fr inspektionsfrfaranden (inspektionsrapporters format, inspektionsfrfarande, liten handbok fr uppfljning av vertr-delser) som kommer att bidra effektivt till enhetliga spelregler.
The Community Fisheries Control Agency could contribute to this task in line with its mandate. 
Gemenskapens kontrollorgan fr fiske skulle kunna medverka i denna uppgift i linje med sitt mandat.
At the initiative of the Commission, similar provision have already been put in place at the level of certain Regional Fisheries Management Organisations. 
P initiativ av kommissionen har liknande tgrder redan vidtagits inom regionala organisationer fr fiskerifrvaltning.
The current system has been established on the basis of an obligation for Member States to achieve an effective control system. 
Det nuvarande systemet har inrttats p grundval av medlemsstaternas skyldighet att f till stnd ett effektivt kontrollsystem.
The Commission considers that the scope for developing common rules is limited given the absence of common factors. 
Kommissionen anser att utrymmet fr utarbetande av gemensamma bestmmelser r begrnsat genom avsaknaden av gemensamma faktorer.
Moreover, as pointed out in reply to point 53, the absence of detailed rules does not diminish Member StatesŐ obligation to achieve an effective control system. 
Vidare Đ vilket anges i svaret p punkt 53 Đ minskas inte medlemsstaternas skyldighet att f till stnd ett effektivt kontrollsystem genom avsaknaden av utfrliga bestmmelser.
The inspections undertaken have provided the Commission with a good knowledge on the application of specific provisions and the functioning of the inspection and monitoring systems of Member States and have, in fact, allowed the Commission to detect key weaknesses in Member States. 
De inspektioner som genomfrts har gett kommissionen god kunskap om hur specifika bestmmelser tillmpas och om hur medlemsstaternas inspektions-och vervakningssystem fungerar och har gett kommissionen mjlighet att upptcka vsentliga svagheter i medlemsstaterna.
28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 317/29 While the Commission has focussed its resources on high risk cases, general evaluations have also been undertaken through horizontal inspection programmes on catch reporting systems (2005-2006), market regulations (2004), third country vessels landings (2005), VMS implementation (2004-2006) and deep-sea fisheries in European waters (2005-2006). 
28.12.2007 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 317/29 Kommissionen har inriktat sina resurser p hgriskfall, men allmnna utvrderingar har ocks genomfrts genom vergripande inspektionsprogram om system fr rapportering av fngster (2005Đ2006), marknadsregleringar (2004), landningar frn fartyg frn tredjeland (2005), infrande av VMS (2004Đ2006) och djuphavsfiske i europeiska vatten (2005Đ2006).
Moreover, since 2004, the Commission has regularly used a series of questionnaires and evaluation sheets to evaluate the systems of control in Member States, notably in terms of compliance with recently adopted rules and with the quality of individual inspections. 
Dessutom har kommissionen sedan 2004 regelbundet anvnt en rad frgeformulr och utvrderingsformulr fr att utvrdera kontrollsystemen i medlemsstaterna i synnerhet i frga om efterlevnaden av nyligen antagna bestmmelser och kvaliteten p enskilda inspektioner.
Furthermore, indicators of compliance (intensity and quality of inspections) have been defined and used to evaluate Member States compliance with the CFP in the context of infringement proceedings. 
Vidare har indikatorer p efterlevnad (inspektionernas intensitet och kvalitet) faststllts och anvnds fr utvrdering av medlemsstaternas efterlevnad av GFP inom ramen fr vertrdelsefrfaranden.
The Commission has worked on establishing benchmarks and priorities in certain fisheries, which have proved effective. 
Kommissionen har arbetat med att faststlla riktmrken och prioriteringar inom vissa fisken, vilket har visat sig vara effektivt.
Further steps in this direction are foreseen in the review and revision of the Control Regulation. 
Ytterligare tgrder i denna riktning r planerade vid versynen och omarbetningen av kontrollfrordningen.
It is against this background that the Commission has recently (1) made efforts to establish benchmarks as pointed out in the reply to point 59. 
Mot denna bakgrund har kommissionen nyligen (1) gjort insatser fr att faststlla riktmrken ssom anges i svaret p punkt 59.
Moreover, it has established guidelines for the Member States for defining, per type of inspection, the minimum standards to be ensured. 
Vidare har kommissionen faststllt riktlinjer fr medlemsstaterna fr att fr varje typ av inspektion ange de minimistandarder som ska skerstllas.
These efforts have been welcomed by the Member States. The review and revision of the Control Regulation will be an opportunity to incorporate these standards into the CFP legislation. 
Dessa insatser har vlkomnats av medlemsstaterna. versynen och omarbetningen av kontrollfrordningen kommer att ge mjlighet att infrliva dessa standarder i GFP-lagstiftningen.
In addition, it will remain necessary to continue the cooperation between Member States. 
Dessutom kommer fortsatt samarbete mellan medlemsstaterna att frbli ndvndigt.
In particular, the Community Fisheries Control Agency is expected play an important roles in this regard. 
Srskilt Gemenskapens kontrollorgan fr fiske frvntas spela en betydande roll i detta avseende.
As regards the desirability of checking fish holds at the end of a landing, the Commission believes that this should be part of a full inspection. 
Betrffande det nskvrda i att kontrollera lastrummen i slutet av en landning anser kommissionen att detta br ing i en fullstndig inspektion.
This approach is also reflected in legislation covering the pelagic fisheries from 2005 and the Baltic fisheries from 2008. 
Detta synstt terspeglas ven i lagstiftning som omfattar det pelagiska fisket frn 2005 och stersjfisket frn 2008.
See also the replies to point 60 and 62. 
Se ven svaren p punkterna 60 och 62.
The Commission has been systematically attentive to this issue for many years, finally allowing it in 2007 to establish general criteria for effective inspections. 
Kommissionen har systematiskt uppmrksammat denna frga i mnga r, vilket slutligen gjorde det mjligt fr den att 2007 faststlla allmnna kriterier fr effektiva inspektioner.
The Commission notes that there are differences between Member States and that some of them have in fact established procedural guides for their inspectors. 
Kommissionen noterar att det freligger skillnader mellan medlemsstaterna och att en del av dem faktiskt har faststllt handledningar fr sina inspektrer.
In the framework of recovery and multiannual management plans, benchmarks of inspection have been established, inter alia cod recovery programme North Sea, Baltic, Bluefin Tuna and Greenland Halibut. 
Inom ramen fr terhmtnings-och flerriga frvaltningsplaner har riktmrken fr inspektion faststllts, bland annat terhmtningsprogram fr Nordsj-och stersjtorsk, tonfisk och liten hlleflundra.
(1) Meeting with Member States on 7 March 2007. 
(1) Mte med medlemsstaterna den 7 mars 2007.
The Commission began discusions on the documentation of individual inspections already in 2005 and continued them in 2006 in the context of case C-304/02 against France. 
Kommissionen inledde diskussioner om dokumentationen av enskilda inspektioner redan 2005 och fortsatte diskussionerna 2006 i samband med ml C-304/02 mot Frankrike.
In view of the establishment of a database integrating all inspection reports, in line with the opinions expressed by the Commission in some of its communications (e.g. the communication on serious infringements (2)), the Commission launched, in spring 2007, a debate with Member States. 
P vren 2007 inledde kommissionen en debatt med medlemsstaterna med tanke p att inrtta en databas dr samtliga inspektionsrapporter integreras i linje med de sikter som kommissionen uttryckt i vissa av sina meddelanden (t.ex. meddelandet om allvarliga vertrdelser (2)).
The Commission expects the Community Fisheries Control Agency to play an important role in improving transparency and harmonisation and to coordinate the establishment of comment practices under the scope of the joint deployment plans. 
Kommissionen frvntar sig att Gemenskapens kontrollorgan fr fiske ska spela en betydande roll fr frbttrad insyn och harmonisering och att det ska samordna infrandet av praxis i frga om synpunkter inom ramen fr planerna fr gemensamt utnyttjande.
The Commission considers that standardized inspection skills and reports would enhance the quality control of the fisheries inspection and intends to address this issue with priority in the review and revision of the Control Regulation. 
Kommissionen anser att standardiserad inspektionstek-nik och standardiserade rapporter skulle frbttra kvalitetskontrollen av fiskeriinspektionen och avser att behandla denna frga med prioritet vid versynen och omarbetningen av kontrollfrordningen.
66. and 67. 
66 och 67.
The Commission considers this to be a good example of best practice and intends to address the issue in the review and revision of the Control Regulation. 
Kommissionen anser att detta r ett gott exempel p bsta praxis och avser att behandla frgan vid versynen och omarbetningen av kontrollfrordningen.
Progress has been made since the CourtŐs visit to the Member States concerned. two of the four Member States mentioned (United Kingdom and France) have already implemented such a system. 
Det har gjorts framsteg efter revisionsrttens besk i de berrda medlemsstaterna. Tv av de fyra medlemsstater som nmns (Storbritannien och Frankrike) har redan infrt ett sdant system.
Only inspections fulfilling the minimum quality standards should be taken into account when assessing the volume and scope of inspection activities. 
Endast inspektioner som uppfyller minimikvalitetsstan-darder br beaktas vid bedmning av inspektionsverksamheter-nas volym och rckvidd.
See the reply to point 63. 
Se svaret p punkt 63.
An increasing number of Member States now provide for their inspectors to have real-time access to such data at their work place. 
Ett kande antal medlemsstater srjer nu fr att deras inspektrer har direkt tillgng till sdana uppgifter p sin arbetsplats.
However, the current situation still remains unsatisfactory and the issue of access to VMS data therefore remains a priority for the Commission. 
Den nuvarande situationen r emellertid fortfarande otillfredsstllande och frgan om tillgng till VMS-uppgifter r drfr fortfarande en prioritering fr kommissionen.
79-81. An increasing number of Member States have started using risk analysis techniques in order to deploy limited resources in the most effective manner. 
79Đ81. Ett kande antal medlemsstater har brjat anvnda riskanalystekniker fr att anvnda begrnsade resurser p det effektivaste sttet.
Cross-checking by Member States of catch data with data collected for other purposes (fiscal, customs and/or other) is indeed important and the Commission is certainly favourable to steps in that direction. Yet, this will have to be done carefully with due regard to the fact that the data in question have been collected for completely different purposes (problem of the comparability of data and data protection requirements). 
Medlemsstaternas dubbelkontroll av fngstuppgifter mot uppgifter som samlats in fr andra ndaml (skatte-, tull-och/eller annat ndaml) r viktig och kommissionen r frvisso positiv till tgrder i den riktningen. nd mste detta gras frsiktigt, med vederbrlig hnsyn till att uppgifterna i frga har samlats in fr helt skilda ndaml (problem med att jmfra uppgifterna och dataskyddskrav).
The variety of inspection services can indeed create risks and the Commission has already underlined this problem on several occasions (3). 
Mngfalden inspektionsorgan kan medfra risker och kommissionen har redan understrukit detta problem vid flera tillfllen (3).
(2) COM(2007) 448 final. 
(2) KOM(2007) 448 slutlig.
C 317/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 28.12.2007 84. and 85. 
C 317/30 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 28.12.2007 84 och 85.
Early in 2007, the Commission introduced a standard template to be used in reporting statistics of inspection activity. 
I brjan av 2007 infrde kommissionen en standardmall som ska anvndas vid rapportering av statistik om inspektionsverksamhet.
Moreover, indicators could be applied: for assessing the activity, the number of inspectors could be used; the assessment of results could for example be based on the number of gaps in VMS transmissions, the number of reported delays in the data collection system, the coherence between the logbooks, landing declarations and VMS, etc. 86. and 87. 
Bedmningen av resultaten skulle till exempel kunna grundas p antalet luckor i VMS-sndningarna, antalet rapporterade frseningar i systemet fr insamling av uppgifter, samstmmigheten mellan loggbckerna, landningsdeklarationer och VMS osv. 86 och 87.
The Commission considers the establishment of the Community Fisheries Control Agency (CFCA) will improve the situation. 
Kommissionen anser att inrttandet av Gemenskapens kontrollorgan fr fiske kommer att frbttra situationen.
The CFCA is mandated to organise operational cooperation between Member States by the adoption of Joint Deployment Plans giving effect to specific control and inspection plans. 
Gemenskapens kontrollorgan fr fiske har mandat att organisera operativt samarbete mellan medlemsstaterna genom antagande av planer fr gemensamt utnyttjande vilka gr specifika kontroll-och inspektionsplaner verkningsfulla.
It has to assess amongst other things whether sufficient national means of inspection and surveillance are available. 
Kontrollorganet ska bland annat bedma huruvida det finns tillrckliga nationella inspektions-och vervakningsresurser.
Moreover the CFCA has to ensure coordination so as to ensure that these means are used in a rational manner. 
Dessutom ska kontrollorganet skerstlla samordningen fr att garantera att dessa resurser anvnds rationellt.
Finally, it will assist Member States in order to harmonise inspection methodologies and procedures. 
Slutligen ska det bist medlemsstaterna fr att harmonisera metoder och frfaranden fr inspektioner.
In this way control and inspection activities should be improved both quantitatively and qualitatively. An enhanced mandate could further improve the situation. 
P s stt br kontroll-och inspektionsverksamheterna frbttras svl kvantitativt som kvalitativt. Ett utkat mandat skulle kunna frbttra situationen ytterligare.
In the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on reports from Member States on behaviour which seriously infringed the rules of the CFP (1) the Commission called on Member States to ensure a system of sanctions that has a deterrent effect and to amend as appropriate their legislation so that sanctions have a dissuasive effect. 
I meddelandet frn kommissionen till rdet och Europaparlamentet om rapporter frn medlemsstaterna om beteenden som utgjorde allvarliga vertrdelser av den gemensamma fiskeripolitikens bestmmelser (1) uppmanade kommissionen medlemsstaterna att se till att de hade ett sanktionssystem med avskrckande verkan och att vid behov ndra sin lagstiftning fr att uppn detta.
Further integration and harmonisation could be of added value for improving the implementation by Member States of an effective sanction system. 
Ytterligare integrering och harmonisering skulle kunna ge ett mervrde nr det gller att frbttra medlemsstaternas genomfrande av ett effektivt sanktionssystem.
In that regard, the Commission is currently exploring the possibility to include in the foreseen new initiatives regarding illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing harmonised sanctions to be applied for certain specific ÔIUU-offencesŐ In addition, the forthcoming review and revision of the Control Regulation will be an opportunity to address this issue. 
I det avseendet undersker kommissionen fr nrvarande mjligheten att infra harmoniserade sanktioner som ska tillmpas p vissa specifika vertrdelser som avser illegalt, oreglerat och oanmlt fiske i de planerade nya initiativen om illegalt, oreglerat och oanmlt fiske. Dessutom kommer den frestende versynen och omarbetningen av kontrollfrordningen att ge mjlighet att behandla denna frga.
Further improvement of the homogeneity of information provided by Members States in their reports on serious infringements pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1447/1999 as well further study of the relevant serious infringements is needed in order to prepare a proposal concerning the catalogue of sanctions. 
Ytterligare frbttrad homogenitet avseende den information som medlemsstaterna lmnar i sina rapporter om allvarliga vertrdelser enligt frordning (EG) nr 1447/1999 samt ytterligare studium av relevanta allvarliga vertrdelser behvs fr att utarbeta ett frslag om katalogen med sanktioner.
As pointed out in reply to point 92, the Commission intends to address this issue in the near future. 
Ssom anges i svaret p punkt 92 mnar kommissionen behandla denna frga inom en snar framtid.
95. The infringement proceedings have not been without effect. 
95. vertrdelsefrfarandena har inte varit utan verkan.
The Commission has opened infringement proceedings against several Member States. 
Kommissionen har inlett vertrdelsefrfaranden mot flera medlemsstater.
After the judgement of the ECJ in case C-304/02, Member States subject to such proceedings have been induced to make serious efforts to improve the compliance with the respective obligations. 
Efter EG-domstolens dom i ml C-304/02 har medlemsstater som omfattas av sdana frfaranden frmtts att gra betydande insatser fr att frbttra efterlevnaden av respektive skyldigheter.
Apart from infringement proceedings, Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 empowers the Commission to take preventive measures, to close the fishery when it deems a Member State has exhausted its quota and to suspend Community financial assistance. 96. and 97. 
Utver vertrdelsefrfaranden tilldelas genom frordning (EG) nr 2371/2002 kommissionen befogenhet att vidta preventiva tgrder, stoppa fisket nr den anser att en medlemsstat har uttmt sin kvot och tillflligt avstnga en medlemsstat frn gemenskapens finansiella std.
Infringement proceedings against Member States are circumscribed by the provisions of Article 226 of the EC Treaty. Modification of both their substantive objectives as well as the procedural steps would require an amendment of the Treaty. 
96 och 97. vertrdelsefrfaranden mot medlemsstater begrnsas genom bestmmelserna i artikel 226 i EG-frdraget. ndring av svl deras innehllsmssiga ml som tgrderna i frfarandet skulle krva en ndring av frdraget.
The handling by the Commission of infringement proceedings is shaped by the case law of the ECJ. The Commission has the burden of proof in infringement proceedings, which becomes particularly relevant in cases where the alleged non-compliance by a Member State consists in a particular administrative practice. 
Kommissionens handlggning av vertrdelsefrfaranden formas av EG-domstolens rttspraxis. Kommissionen har bevisbrdan i vertrdelsefrfaranden, och detta blir srskilt relevant i ml dr en medlemsstats pstdda vertrdelse bestr i en srskild administrativ praxis.
In such a case, it is actually decisive to demonstrate that the shortcomings are both general and ongoing. 
I ett sdant ml r det faktiskt avgrande att visa att bristerna r bde allmnna och pgende.
This requires a continuous effort on the side of the Commission to assemble the appropriate means of proof. 
Detta ndvndiggr en kontinuerlig anstrngning frn kommissionens sida fr att sammanstlla de lmpliga bevismedlen.
The case C-304/02 underscored the difficulties of assembling proper means of proof in a situation where an administrative practice of a Member State was at issue and the efforts made have in fact contributed to the imposition of a significantly higher fine than those imposed for any of the other five cases ever decided upon by the ECJ on the basis of Article 228 of the EC Treaty. 
Ml C-304/02 visade tydligt svrigheterna att sammanstlla korrekta bevismedel i en situation dr en medlemsstats administrativa praxis var omstridd. De insatser som gjordes bidrog i sjlva verket till att ett vsentligt hgre btesbelopp utdmdes n i ngot av de vriga fem ml som EG-domstolen avgjort p grundval av artikel 228 i EG-frdraget.
Preventive measures pursuant to the Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 can only be provisional in nature and limited in time (up to a maximum of six months, as indicated). 
Frebyggande tgrder enligt artikel 26 i frordning (EG) nr 2371/2002 kan endast vara av tillfllig art och tidsbegrnsade (hgst 6 mnader, ssom anges).
Since 1996, the obligation to deduct amounts from future fishing opportunities, has been implemented yearly by way of applying Regulation (EC) No 847/96, which establishes the conditions for the year-to-year management of total allowable catches (TACs) and quotas. 
Sedan 1996 har skyldigheten att dra av mngder frn framtida fiskemjligheter genomfrts rligen i enlighet med frordning (EG) nr 847/96. Enligt denna frordning faststlls villkoren fr frvaltningen av totala tilltna fngstmngder (TAC:er) och kvoter frn ett r till ett annat.
In normal circumstances over-fishing will have been detected in the year of or the one following the over fishing and thus there was never a need for additional action. In 2007 however, for the first time, following a national investigation, two Member States reported to the Commission significant amounts of catches which had been landed in the period from 2001 to 2004 without having been recorded. 
Under normala frhllanden upptcks verfiskning det r eller ret efter det r d verfisk-ningen gt rum, och det behvdes drfr ingen ytterligare tgrd. r 2007 anmlde emellertid fr frsta gngen tv medlemsstater efter en nationell utredning fr kommissionen att betydande fngstmngder hade landats mellan 2001 och 2004 utan att ha registrerats.
Given that Regulation (EC) No 847/96 does not envisage deductions for such Ôhistoric overfishingŐ, the Commission had to adopt an ad hoc Regulation. 
Eftersom det i frordning (EG) nr 847/96 inte freskrivs avdrag fr Óverfiske i det frflutnaÓ mste kommissionen anta en srskild frordning fr detta fall (ad hoc-frordning).
This ad hoc Regulation (2) provided a solution based on an analysis of the biological and socio-economic consequences of this Regulation. 
I denna ad hoc-frordning (2) freskrevs en lsning som grundade sig p en analys av de biologiska och socioekonomiska konsekvenserna av frordningen.
Finally, in response to this situation, the Council, during its meeting on 11 and 12 June 2007, has invited the Commission to develop principles in the forthcoming review of the EU control regulations to be applied in respect of any such over-fishing which comes to light in any EU fishery. 
Slutligen uppmanade rdet vid sitt mte den 11 och 12 juni 2007 som en reaktion p denna situation kommissionen att vid den frestende versynen av EU:s kontrollfrordningar utarbeta principer som ska tillmpas vid verfiske som upptcks i ngot av EU:s fisken.