natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This finding shows the necessity of differentiating clearly, in the statistics, between forecasts, jobs actually created and jobs safeguarded (5). 
Denna iakttagelse visar ndvndigheten av att man i statistiken tydligt skiljer mellan prognoser och faktiskt skapade eller bevarade arbetstillfllen (5).
Furthermore, setting up a more regular system for gathering information from aid beneficiaries would allow managers to be informed periodically about the state of progress of the projects and the jobs actually created and/or safeguarded. 
Dessutom skulle inrttandet av ett mera fast system fr insamling av uppgifter frn stdmottagarna gra det mjligt fr handlggarna att regelbundet informera sig om lget fr projekten och om antalet faktiskt skapade och/eller bevarade arbetstillfllen.
Reference tables developed in France and Italy estimate the number of jobs created or safeguarded, among other things on thebasisofthenatureandamountoftheinvestmentsmade,but they are no substitute for a project-by-project approach, because the wide variations among the co-financed operations limit the valueofthefiguresobtained. 
I referenstabeller som utarbetats i Frankrike och Italien uppskattas antalet skapade eller bevarade arbetstillfllen bland annat p grundval av de gjorda investeringarnas art och belopp. Denna metod kan inte erstta ett projektbaserat tillvgagngsstt, eftersom de medfinansierade tgrderna r s olika att de uppgifter som erhlls p detta stt r av begrnsat vrde.
Problems concerning safeguarded jobs 66. 
Problem med anknytning till bevarade arbetstillfllen 66.
Statistics on jobs do not differentiate between the jobs created and the jobs safeguarded. 
Statistiken ver arbetstillfllen skiljer inte mellan skapade och bevarade arbetstillfllen.
Therefore, in the majority of these cases, only the initial labour force, the end labour force and the jobs created were indicated. 
I de flesta av dessa fall anges bara antalet arbetstillfllen fre och efter samt antalet skapade arbetstillfllen.
On the other hand, jobs that were at risk of being lost but which were safeguarded due to the granting of aid were not recorded and any jobs already existing at the time of the aid application were often considered to be safeguarded 4 () Noconclusioncouldbedrawninninecasesbecausethesupporting documents were not available (four cases) or because the projects 5 were not yet far enough advanced (five cases). () The joint employment report (COM(2000) 551 final of 6 September 2000, p. 
Dremot saknas uppgifter om arbetstillfllen som riskerade att frsvinna men som bevarats tack vare stdet och ofta betraktades alla arbetstillfllen som redan existerade d 4 () I nio fall gick det inte att dra ngon slutsats eftersom det saknades verifikationer (fyra fall) eller eftersom projekten nnu inte hade fort-5 skridit tillrckligt lngt (fem fall). () I den gemensamma rapporten om sysselsttningen (KOM(2000) 551 slutlig, s.
109) indicates that the Objective 1(a) funding provided (notably by the ERDF) in Germany will have contributed to safeguarding and creating 480 000 jobs. 
109, 6 september 2000) sgs att finansieringen (bl.a. genom ERUF) av ml 1Đtgrder i Tyskland har bidragit till att bevara och skapa 480 000 arbetstillfllen.
However, this is only a provisional estimate. 
Detta antal r emellertid bara en preliminr uppskattning.
C 334/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 28.11.2001 jobs (1). However, during the on-the-spot checks, several cases were detected where there was no risk of jobs being lost unless aid was granted. 
C 334/20 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 28.11.2001 stdanskan gjordes som bevarade arbetstillfllen (1). Vid kontrollerna p plats kunde det emellertid i flera fall konstateras att de redovisade arbetstillfllena inte riskerade att frsvinna om inte std beviljades.
Moreover, it also became apparent on this occasion that the statistics contained data concerning safeguarded jobs at companies that were in a state of bankruptcy or had suspended payment. 
Dessutom befanns statistiken ver bevarade arbetstillfllen innefatta uppgifter avseende fretag som gtt i konkurs eller stllt in sina betalningar.
Consequences of programme flexibility 67. 
Konsekvenserna av programmens flexibilitet 67.
The evaluation of the impact of ERDF aid on employment is influenced by the fact that the co-financing of a national aid scheme allows the national authorities either to apply for co-financing for an eligible project, or to finance the project entirely from national resources. 
Utvrderingen av sysselsttningseffekterna av stdet frn ERUF pverkas av att metoden med medfinansiering av nationella stdsystem ger de nationella myndigheterna mjlighet att fr ett visst stdberttigat projekt vlja att antingen begra medfinansiering eller lta finansieringen ske enbart med nationella medel.
It is clear that such choices or substitutions may have a beneficial or adverse influence on the evaluation of the effectiveness of a co-financed programme if the projects in question are typified by differences in terms of the aid made available and/or the recorded effects on employment, and may result in a distorted assessment of the effectiveness of an aid scheme. 
Det r uppenbart att dessa val-och utbytesmj-ligheter kan ge utslag Đ i bde positiv och negativ riktning Đ vid utvrderingen av effektiviteten fr medfinansierade program om de berrda projekten skiljer sig frn varandra i frga om stdbelopp och/eller konstaterade sysselsttningseffekter, och att detta fljaktligen kan medfra att bedmningen av ett stdsystems effektivitet blir felaktig.
Moreover, reprogramming decisions are often taken with a view to ensuring the take-up of the Community funds made avail-ableandtakefarlessaccountoftheimpactofmeasures,includ- ing the impact on employment (see paragraph 39). 
Dessutom fattas beslut om ndrad planering ofta med syftet att se till att alla EU-medel som stllts till frfogande kan utnyttjas, medan tgrdernas effekter p bland annat sysselsttningen beaktas i betydligt lgre grad (se punkt 39).
Cases of reprogramming decisions such as these were identified at project level (2) in several Member States, as was the withdrawal from the (1) In Spain, for example, it was found that the authorities responsible operate on the principle that if an enterprise implements two projects co-financed by the ERDF, each project enables all the jobs at that enterprise to be maintained. 
Sdana beslut om ndring av tgrdsplanering (2) observerades i flera medlemsstater, och 1 () I Spanien kunde det exempelvis konstateras att de ansvariga myndigheterna utgr frn principen att om tv projekt som medfinansieras av ERUF bedrivs i ett och samma fretag, anses vart och ett av projekten leda till att samtliga arbetstillfllen i det fretaget bevaras.
In the same way, when an enterprise receives two consecutive grants of aid, the jobs created by the first project are presented as maintained jobs in the second project. 
Om ett fretag fr std inom tv p varandra fljande projekt rknas de arbetstillfllen som skapades i det frsta projektet som bevarade i det andra.
In one instance, the number of jobs deemed to have been created and maintained was even in excess of the total number 2 of staff at the enterprise. () In Spain, a project to open a new open-cast mine and expand copper, lead and zinc mining activities was approved in October 1993, with a view to ensuring a continuation of production up until 2007 and creating and maintaining a specified number of jobs in an area of high unemployment. 
Detta innebr att arbetstillfllen kan komma att rknas (minst) tv gnger. I ett fall visade det sig att det uppgivna totalantalet skapade och bevarade arbetstillfllen var avsevrt strre n det berrda fre-2 tagets sammanlagda personalstyrka. () I Spanien godkndes i oktober 1993 ett projekt som avsg ppnande av ett nytt dagbrott och utkning av koppar-, bly-och zinkbrytningen.
Subsequently, in the requests and decisions to amend the project, the conditions concerning the creation and safeguarding of jobs were watered down and manipulated. 
Lngre fram gjordes sedan anskningar om ndring av projektet, och beslut fattades som medfrde att villkoren i frga om skapande och bevarande av arbetstillfllen snktes och ndrades.
The same was true in the case of another mining company which also received aid from the Spanish authorities for the creation and maintenance of a specified number of jobs, even though the Commission (Industry DG) had strongly recommended that this aid should not be granted,duetothecriticalfinancialsituation. 
Ett likartat fall gllde ett annat gruvbolag som fick std frn de spanska myndigheterna p villkor att ett visst antal arbetstillfllen skulle skapas och bevaras, trots att kommissionen (GD Industri)  det kraftigaste hade avstyrkt beviljandet av std p grund av det kritiska finansiella lget.
In Germany, the Court found various eligibility problems concerning a large project that provided for the purchase of a company threatened with closure, with the intention of safeguarding and creating a number of jobs. 
I Tyskland kunde revisionsrtten konstatera olika problem med anknytning till stdberttigande fr ett stort projekt som innebar att ett fretag som riskerade att tvingas lgga ned verksamheten skulle kpas s att ett visst antal arbetstillfllen skulle kunna bevaras och skapas.
Based on a decision taken by the authority responsible, this project was withdrawn from the programme and replaced by 51 other projects for which the overall implemented expenditure was comparable, with little consideration for the effects of the respective projects, including those in the field of employment. Community programming of large-scale measures in Portugal (3) and in Ireland (4), without the impact of these measures on employment really being taken into account. 
Efter beslut av den ansvariga myndigheten slopades detta projekt ur programmet och ersattes med 51 andra projekt som tillsammans motsvarade kostnader i samma storleksordning, dock utan att de berrda projektens effekter p bland annat sysselsttningen beaktades i ngon strre utstrckning. dessutom visade det sig att man i Portugal (3) och Irland (4) hade slopat omfattande tgrder frn gemenskapsplanerna utan att i egentlig mening beakta dessa tgrders sysselsttningseffekter.
Aid per job 69. 
Std per arbetstillflle 69.
While several Member States have introduced rules on maximum aid per job, others have not set any ceilings limiting the amountsthatcanbegranted.Thisisanadvantageinthecaseof projects with a large capital component and a relatively limited impact on employment. 
Flera medlemsstater har infrt regler om maximalt stdbelopp per arbetstillflle, men i andra finns det inga faststllda grnser fr de belopp som kan beviljas. Detta r frdelaktigt fr kapitalintensiva projekt med relativt begrnsad sysselsttningseffekt.
However, the ceilings set per job created range from 4 882 euro, the amount granted as a loan by the MSIF (United Kingdom), to 511 292 euro, which was the amount granted in the form of a subsidy in connection with the Common Task in Germany. 
De vre grnser som bestmts fr stdbeloppet per skapat arbetstillflle varierar emellertid avsevrt: frn 4 882 euro, det belopp som kan beviljas i form av ln av MSIF (Frenade kungariket), till 511 292 euro, det belopp som kan beviljas i form av bidrag inom ramen fr den Ógemensamma uppgiftenÓ i Tyskland.
Only one Member State (Germany) provided for maximum aid of 255 646 euro per job safeguarded. 
En enda medlemsstat (Tyskland) har bestmt en vre grns per bevarat arbetstillflle (255 646 euro).
Depending on the project, assistance per job ranged from 1 000 euro, granted in the form of a loan, to 600 000 euro, granted in the form of aid, 3 () In Portugal, management of the microenterprise assistance scheme (RIME), which provides start-up assistance for economic activities liable to create jobs by encouraging small-scale investments, was the subject of an infringement procedure initiated by the Commission because the national authorities failed to comply with Article 21(3) of Regulation (EEC) No 2082/93, which stipulates that the beneficiaries of projects should receive all the aid without any deduction. 
Beroende p projekt uppgick stdet till allt frn 1 000 euro i form av ln till 600 000 euro i form av bidrag, utan (3) Administrationen av det portugisiska systemet fr std till mycket sm fretag (RIME), som ger std till startande av ekonomiska aktiviteter med god frmga att skapa arbetstillfllen med hjlp av sm investeringar, blev freml fr ett vertrdelsefrfarande frn kommissionens sida. Kommissionen hvdade att de nationella myndigheterna inte hade efterlevt artikel 21.3 i frordning (EEG) nr 2082/93, som sger att stdmottagarna skall erhlla hela stdbeloppet utan avdrag.
In the wake of this procedure, Portugal submitted, in December 1999, a proposal for reprogramming under which the scheme in question was to be excluded from co-financing (at the end of 1999, the ERDF contribution amounted to around 302 million euro), despite the fact that this scheme was considered to be the main instrument for the creation of jobs supported by the Structural Funds. 
Drefter freslog Portugal i december 1999 att programplaneringen skulle ndras s att RIME inte lngre skulle medfinansieras av EU (i slutet av 1999 uppgick bidraget frn ERUF till omkring 302 miljoner euro), trots att RIME ansgs vara det viktigaste av de verktyg fr skapande av sysselsttning som stddes av strukturfonderna.
Furthermore, the CourtŐs audit showed a clear discrepancy between the figures presented by the Portuguese authorities in June 1999 in a RIME brochure (creation of 12 924 jobs since 1994) and the figures used by the Commission in July 1999 (creation of 35 000 jobs since 1996). 
I vrigt fann revisionsrtten vid sin kontroll att det frelg en betydande skillnad mellan de uppgifter som de portugisiska myndigheterna redovisade i en broschyr om RIME i juni 1999 (12 924 arbetstillfllen sades ha skapats sedan 1994) och de uppgifter som kommissionen anvnde i juli 1999 (35 000 arbetstillfllen skapade sedan 1996).
However, these statistics relate to all the projects covered by the aid scheme and 4 not solely to co-financed actions, the data for which do not exist. () As a result of IrelandŐs great success in attracting foreign enterprises and of the political discussions concerning the issue of relocation, the ERDFstoppedco-financingtheÔInwardinvestmentŐaidschemeasof 1 January 1998. 
Denna statistik gller emellertid samtliga projekt inom ramen fr stdsystemet, inte bara de tgrder som medfinansierats Đ 4 uppgifter enbart om dessa saknas. () I Irland har tgrderna fr att locka utlndska fretag till landet varit mycket framgngsrika, och en politisk debatt har uppsttt om problemen med omlokaliseringseffekter Đ dvs. att fretag med hjlp av std lockas att flytta sin verksamhet frn en plats till en annan utan att ngon nettoeffekt uppstr p sysselsttningen. Detta har medfrt att ERUF frn och med den 1 januari 1998 inte lngre medfinansierar stdsystemet ÓInvesteringar med utlndskt ursprungÓ.
However, the 1998 annual report on the Objective 1 OP ÔIndustrial development 1994 to 1999Ő still describes the Inward investment subprogramme without mentioning that the ERDF no longer contributes to the co-financing. 
I rsrapporten fr 1998 om tgrdsprogrammet fr ml 1 ÓIndustriell utveckling 1994Đ1999Ó nmndes emellertid fortfarande delprogrammet ÓInvesteringar med utlndskt ursprungÓ utan att det sades ngot om att ERUF:s medfinansiering hade upphrt.
Furthermore, the annual report states that 16 027 jobs were created with the aid of the OP (a figure which excludes the data from the government department responsible for the Inward investment aid scheme), whereas the Annex gives a figure of 32 023 jobs (which includes these data). 
I sjlva rsrapporten sades fr vrigt att 16 027 arbetstillfllen hade skapats med hjlp av stdet frn tgrdsprogrammet (vilket inte innefattade uppgifterna frn den irlndska myndigheten med ansvar fr stdsystemet ÓInvesteringar med utlndskt ursprungÓ), medan det i bilagan angavs att 32 023 arbetstillfllen hade skapats (vilket dremot innefattade de uppgifterna).
28.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 334/21 in a manner not apparently connected with the sector concerned or the objectives of the projects (1). 
28.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 334/21 att det fanns ngot uppenbart samband mellan stdbeloppens niv och de berrda projektens sektor eller ml (1).
Moreover, there is often a lack of transparency or a great variationinthedefinitionsusedtocalculatethecostofajobor the aid paid per job (total cost of the investment, total eligible cost,sumtotalofthepublicaiddisbursed,sumtotaloftheCom-munity aid disbursed, etc.). 
De definitioner som anvnds vid berkningen av kostnaden eller stdbeloppet per arbetstillflle r fr vrigt ofta ngot oklara eller ocks olika frn fall till fall (exempelvis totalkostnaden fr investeringen, den totala stdberttigade kostnaden, summan av de offentliga bidragen eller summan av EU-bidragen).
Sustainabilityofjobs 72. 
Arbetstillfllenas varaktighet 72.
In order to achieve durable positive impact on the job market, it is essential for the jobs created or safeguarded to be of medium or long-term duration (see also paragraph 124 concerning the ESF). 
Fr att de positiva effekterna p arbetsmarknaden skall bli varaktiga r det oundgngligt att de skapade eller bevarade arbetstillfllenas varaktighet r medellng eller lng (se ven punkt 124 om ESF).
Moreover, the CourtŐs audit demon-(1) The highest amount was granted in connection with FSI for a railway test centre in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region which was to create only seven new jobs in return for substantial amounts of investment (eligible expenditure of 18,4 million euro). 
I vrigt visar emel-(1) Det hgsta beloppet beviljades inom ramen fr FSI i Frankrike avseende ett provningscentrum fr jrnvgsmateriel i regionen Nord-Pas-de-Calais, som med en betydande investering (stdberttigade utgifter p 18,4 miljoner euro) inte skulle skapa mer n sju nya arbetstillfllen.
According to the rules on the developmentpremium(primedŐamnagementduterritoire),whichalso apply in the case of FSI, the considerable indirect effects that the project had on railway construction in the region could not be taken into account in the context of the aid approval. 
Enligt reglerna fr bidraget till fysisk planering, som ven FSI mste flja, var det inte mjligt att beakta de avsevrda indirekta effekterna p jrnvgsbyggandet i regionen vid beslutet om att godknna stdet.
In consequence the specified ceiling (10 517 euro per job created) was exceeded by a substantial amount. 
Drigenom kom den faststllda vre grnsen per skapat arbetstillflle (10 517 euro) att verskridas med stor marginal.
This is also the case for 17 other FSI projects 2 co-financed by the ERDF. ()InSpain,atthetimetheÔRegionalincentivesŐaidschemewaslaunched, the beneficiary only had to guarantee the creation, at the project implementation stage, of the number of jobs stipulated in the decision to grant aid. No period was set with regard to sustainability. 
Detta 2 gller ven 17 andra FSI-projekt som medfinansierats av ERUF. () Nr mjligheten till medfinansiering genom ERUF infrdes fr det spanska stdsystemet ÓRegionala incitamentÓ, krvdes av stdmottagarna enbart att de skulle tillse att det i stdbeslutet angivna antalet arbetstillfllen skapades under projektets genomfrande.
However, since this system was abused (the enterprises concerned took on staff for a minimum period simply to qualify for aid), a clause was introduced to the effect that the posts created had to be maintained up to the end of the investment period. In 1999, the obligation to maintain the jobs created for longer than two years after the end of the project was added. The question nevertheless arises of whether this additional period of two years provides a guarantee of thedurabilityofthejobs.DuringtheauditinSpain,forexample,it was found that a company had created (at the end of the project) the jobs stipulated in the conditions governing assistance. 
Eftersom detta tillvgagngsstt resulterade i missbruk (fretag anstllde folk under mycket kort tid fr att f bidrag) infrdes sedermera en regel som innebar att de skapade tjnsterna mste finnas kvar till investeringsperiodens slut. r 1999 skrptes kravet s att de skapade arbetstillfllena i stllet mste finnas kvar i tv r efter projektets slut. Trots detta kan man frga sig om denna tvrsperiod r tillrcklig fr att man skall kunna skerstlla att arbetstillfllena blir varaktiga. Vid kontrollerna i Spanien kunde revisionsrtten exempelvis konstatera att ett visst fretag (mot slutet av projektperioden) hade skapat det antal arbetstillfllen som krvdes enligt stdvillkoren.
In the case of the other co-financed aid schemes, the maximum monitoring period ranged from two years (FSI in France) to eight years (Common Task in Germany) from completion of the investment (4). 
Fr de vriga medfinansierade stdsystemen varierar den maximala kontrollperioden mellan tv (FSI i Frankrike) och tta r (den Ógemensamma uppgiftenÓ i Tyskland) efter det att investeringarna slutfrts (4).
In view of this kind of diversity, Article 30(4) of the new general Regulation on the Structural Funds (Regulation (EC) No 1260/ 1999) requires the Member States to ensure that an operation retains the contribution from the Funds only if that operation doesnot,withinfiveyearsofthedateofthedecisionofthecom-petent national authorities, undergo a substantial modification that affects its implementation conditions or gives an enterprise an undue advantage, as a result either of a cessation or change of location in a productive activity. 
Med tanke p denna mngfald har man i artikel 30.4 i den nya frordningen om allmnna bestmmelser fr strukturfonderna (frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999) tagit med ett krav p att medlemsstaterna skall skerstlla att en insats eller ett projekt fr behlla sitt std frn fonderna endast om insatsen eller projektet inom fem r frn dagen fr den behriga nationella myndighetens beslut inte har varit freml fr ngon betydande frndring som pverkar villkoren fr dess genomfrande eller innebr att ett fretag fr en otillbrlig frmn och som fljer av upphrande eller frndring av lokaliseringen fr en produktionsverksamhet.
One of the reasons for introducing this rule was to prevent enterprises from being able to take advantageofanaidschemewithouthavinganyintentionof establishing themselves long term in the eligible area (although the rule does not apply to cases of relocation from a site not in receiptofaidtoanothersiteinaneligiblezoneforthesolepur-pose of receiving aid, nor to cases of job cuts following a reduction in output or a rise in productivity). 
Denna regel infrdes bland annat med syftet att frhindra att ett fretag kan dra frdelar av ett stdsystem utan att behva etablera sig lngsiktigt i det stdberttigade omrdet (men regeln tcker inte fall dr ett fretag flyttar verksamhet frn en plats dr det inte fr std till en annan plats i ett stdberttigat omrde enbart i syfte att erhlla std, och inte heller fall dr ett fretags personalstyrka minskar p grund av att produktionen minskar eller produktiviteten kar).
Thus, some aid schemes stipulated that the objectives concerning employment only had to be achieved some years after the end of the investment programme (5). 
Det finns exempel p stdsystem dr sysselsttningsmlen inte behver vara uppfyllda frrn ngra r efter investeringsprogrammets slut (5).