natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
25 Food assistance for refugees in the Northwest of Tanzania and Spontaneous Site Management and Coordination in the DRC. 
25 Livsmedelsbistnd till flyktingar i nordvstra Tanzania och spontan frvaltning och samordning av omrden i Demokratiska republiken Kongo.
Observations 22 Timeliness of submitted reports UN Agencies International Organisations NGOs Total Interim reports Total number of Interim Reports submitted Number of Interim Reports delayed 5 2 3 2 7 2 15 6 Percentage of late Interim Reports 40 % 67 % 29 % 40 % Average delay (days) 32 17 9 19 Final reports Total number of Final Reports submitted Number of Final Reports delayed 8 8 3 2 8 3 19 13 Percentage of late Final Reports 100 % 67 % 38 % 68 % Average delay (days) 34 102 17 41 38 A key feature of the Commission’s intervention in the AGL region, in comparison to most other humanitarian donors, is its field presence (see paragraphs 9 and 10). 
Iakttagelser 22 Inlmning av rapporter FN-organ Internationella organisationer Frivillig-organisationer Totalt Delrapporter Totalt antal inlmnade delrapporter Antal frsenade delrapporter 5 2 3 2 7 2 15 6 Procentandel av sena delrapporter 40 % 67 % 29 % 40 % Genomsnittlig frsening (dagar) 32 17 9 19 Slutrapporter Totalt antal inlmnade slutrapporter Antal frsenade slutrapporter 8 8 3 2 8 3 19 13 Procentandel av sena slutrapporter 100 % 67 % 38 % 68 % Genomsnittlig frsening (dagar) 34 102 17 41 38 En central del av kommissionens insats i omrdet kring de afrikanska stora sjarna r att den till skillnad frn merparten av de vriga humanitra givarna finns nrvarande p fltet (se punkterna 9 och 10).
This allows for collaboration and exchange of information with partners and enables the Commission to have solid knowledge of the projects. 
Det gr att den kan samarbeta och utbyta information med partner och f gedigen kunskap om projekten.
This on-the-spot presence was much appreciated by the partners met during the audit who valued the support and expertise provided by the Commission staff. 39 However, one quarter26 of the field visit reports were not comprehensive as they commented on certain aspects only and other matters such as financial implementation were not reported. 
Kommissionens nrvaro p fltet var ngot som de partner vi trffade under revisionen verkligen uppskattade, och de vrderade kommissionspersonalens std och expertkunskaper hgt. 39 Men en fjrdedel26 av rapporterna frn fltbesken var inte heltckande eftersom den endast innehll kommentarer om vissa aspekter men inte behandlade andra frgor som det ekonomiska genomfrandet.
In a few cases, the potential effect of detected issues on the results or the budget implementation was not analysed (see examples in Box 3) and no potential mitigating measures were proposed. 
I ngra fall analyserades inte den potentiella effekten av problem som upptckts p resultaten eller budgetgenomfrandet (se exemplen i ruta 3) och det fanns inga frslag till potentiella korrigerande tgrder.
26 For the 20 projects examined, a total of 33 field visits were performed. 
26 Totalt gjordes 33 fltbesk vid de 20 granskade projekten.
For nine of them, the monitoring report contained limited comments. 
Nr det gller nio av dem innehll vervakningsrapporten endast begrnsade kommentarer.
Observations 23 Examples of lack of analysis of the implications of detected issues in field visit reports In two cases, a project to improve the food security situation of conflict-affected populations in Katanga (n°11) and another to provide free healthcare for vulnerable populations in South Kivu (n°19), the projects’ durations were extended because there were delays in the implementation resulting in an underutilisation of the budget. 
Iakttagelser 23 Exempel p nr rapporterna frn fltbesken inte innehll ngon analys av vilka fljder upptckta problem fr I tv fall frlngdes projekten Đ ett som skulle frbttra livsmedelssituationen fr den konfliktdrabbade befolkningen i Katanga (nrĄ11) och ett annat som skulle ge fri hlso-och sjukvrd till den utsatta befolkningen i Sydkivu (nrĄ19) Đ p grund av frseningar i genomfrandet vilket till ledde att budgeten underutnyttjades.
The extensions were granted shortly before the end of the projects. 
Frlngningarna beviljades kort innan projekten skulle avslutas.
The reports of the field visits that took place shortly before the extensions were granted did not analyse the effect on the budget and did not outline the necessity for an extension. 
Rapporterna frn de fltbesk som gde rum kort innan frlngningarna beviljades innehll inte ngon analys av vilken effekt detta skulle f p budgeten och inte heller ngon beskrivning av varfr en frlngning var ndvndig.
Furthermore, the last field visit report for the food security project in Katanga, failed to highlight the impact on the project’s targets (number of beneficiaries, indicators of food distribution and consumption reached, etc.) as a result of funding not received from other donors (final budget less than 50 % of the initial budget). 
I den sista rapporten frn fltbesket hos livsmedelsprojektet i Katanga nmndes dessutom ingenting om hur projektets mlvrden (antal stdmottagare, indikatorer fr utdelning och konsumtion av livsmedel osv.) pverkades av det faktum att finansiering frn andra givare inte togs emot (den slutliga budgeten motsvarade mindre n 50 % av den ursprungliga budgeten).
40 The Commission could not explain how the methodology used was applied to select the partners/projects audited in any specific year in the 2011-2015 period. 
40 Kommissionen kunde inte frklara hur den anvnda metoden tillmpades vid valet av de granskade partnerna/projekten fr ngot specifikt r under perioden 2011Đ2015.
The lack of a clear methodology for programming of audits at both partners’ headquarters and field level may lead to inappropriate audit strategy and coverage and does not facilitate synergies with the monitoring framework in place. 
Att det saknas en tydlig metod fr planeringen av revisioner bde vid partnernas huvudkontor och p fltet kan leda till att revisionens strategi och tckning blir otillrcklig och underlttar inte synergieffekter med den befintliga vervakningsramen.
Follow‐up is insufficient There is no consolidated reporting giving an overview of the HIP’s implementation 41 The Commission only assesses results at project level, but there is no overview for a given country or HIP. 
Uppfljningen r otillrcklig Det finns ingen konsoliderad rapportering som ger en verblick ver genomfrandet av planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd 41 Kommissionen bedmer endast resultat p projektniv. Det finns ingen verblick ver ett bestmt land eller en bestmd plan fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd.
Similarly, the main lessons learned, best practices and the Commission’s added-value identified in the course of the implementation are not reported. 
Inte heller rapporterar man om de viktigaste lrdomar som dragits, bsta praxis och kommissionens mervrde som konstaterats under genomfrandet.
Observations 24 42 Every year the Commission selects and evaluates a number of thematic and geographical areas of intervention in line with its planned multi-annual coverage. 
Iakttagelser 24 42 Varje r vljer kommissionen ut och utvrderar ett antal tematiska och geografiska insatsomrden i linje med sin planerade flerriga tckning.
The last evaluations dealing with the AGL region were country evaluations and took place in 2009 for Burundi, in 2010 for the DRC and in 2011 for Uganda. 
De senaste utvrderingarna avseende omrdet kring de afrikanska stora sjarna var landutvr-deringar och gjordes 2009 fr Burundi, 2010 fr Demokratiska republiken Kongo och 2011 fr Uganda.
The follow‐up of issues identified at project level is not systematic and lacks documentation 43 The individual management document has a specific box for ‘issues for fol-low-up’. 
Uppfljningen av konstaterade problem p projektniv r inte systematisk och dokumenteras inte 43 I frvaltningsdokumentet finns det en srskild ruta fr Óproblem som ska fljas uppÓ.
Some issues raised during the field visits and in partners’ reports were not mentioned in the box even when they obviously necessitated remedial action. 
Vissa problem som togs upp under fltbesken och i partnernas rapporter nmndes inte i rutan fast det var uppenbart att de behvde tgrdas.
In addition, when issues were raised for follow-up, there was nothing to indicate that these had been raised with the project partner. 
Nr man angav att det fanns problem som skulle fljas upp fanns det dessutom ingenting som visade att de hade tagits upp med projektpartnern.
Finally, there was no indication that the problems in question had been addressed. 
Slutligen fanns det ingenting som visade att problemen hade tgrdats.
44 ‘Issues for follow-up’ were specifically identified for 14 projects under review in our audit but only two partners reported directly on the actions taken. 
44 ÓProblem att flja uppÓ konstaterades srskilt fr 14 projekt som vi granskade men endast tv partner rapporterade direkt om vilka tgrder de hade vidtagit.
While in some cases there were indications that measures had been taken by the partners, there is no assurance that this is done systematically. 
I vissa fall fanns det tecken p att partnerna hade vidtagit tgrder, men det finns ingenting som garanterar att det sker systematiskt.
Most of the projects examined delivered satisfactory results 45 We examined whether the intended project results were delivered as planned and whether the Commission was responsive to changes in the field. 
De flesta av de granskade projekten gav tillfredsstllande resultat 45 Vi underskte om de frvntade projektresultaten uppnddes enligt planerna och om kommissionen var lyhrd fr frndringar p fltet.
Observations 25 Overall outcomes achieved are positive but in some cases, the Commission’s assessment is not clearly justified 46 All the projects we examined were in line with the Commission’s objectives and with the envisaged actions for the region. 
Iakttagelser 25 verlag r utfallen positiva men i vissa fall r kommissionens bedmning inte tydligt motiverad 46 Alla de projekt som vi granskade var i linje med kommissionens ml och de tgrder som planerades fr omrdet.
Out of the 20 projects examined, 1927 were found to have delivered satisfactory results despite partial achievements of targets (see example of successful project in Box 4). 
Av de 20 granskade projekten visade sig 1927 ha gett tillfredsstllande resultat trots att mlvrdena endast uppnddes delvis (se exemplet p ett framgngsrikt projekt i ruta 4).
The assessment of project results is based on the comparison between set and achieved targets taking into account the particular difficulties arising in this area of operations. 
Bedmningen av projektresultat bygger p en jmfrelse mellan faststllda och uppndda ml med hnsyn till de srskilda svrigheterna p detta insatsomrde.
27 One was not satisfactory. 
27 Ett projekt var inte tillfredsstllande.
Example of a successful project: Rapid response to movement of populations (RRMP, n°15): This project is one of the Commission’s main vehicles for emergency response related to movements of populations in the DRC. 
Exempel p ett framgngsrikt projekt: Snabb reaktion p folkfrflyttningar (projekt nr 15): Projektet r en av kommissionens frmsta mekanismer fr ndtgrder i samband med folkfrflyttningar i Demokratiska republiken Kongo.
It is a recurring project and the Commission’s funding over the period 2011-2015 amounted to 31.5 million euros. 
Det r ett terkommande projekt och kommissionens finansiering under perioden 2011Đ2015 uppgick till 31,5 miljoner euro.
It provides multi-sectoral assistance, shelter, NFI (pots and pans, clothes, soap, etc.), water, sanitation, and health care in areas where no other humanitarian organisations are present. 
Det tillhandahller std till flera sektorer, ndbostder, andra artiklar n livsmedel (grytor och pannor, klder, tvl osv.), vatten, sanitra tjnster och hlso-och sjukvrd i omrden dr det inte finns ngra andra humanitra organisationer.
Interventions consist of the distribution of NFI and shelters, provision of water, sanitation and health care to the most vulnerable populations who have fled from armed groups or returnees that are just back in their villages but have nothing left. 
Insatserna bestr av utdelning av andra artiklar n livsmedel och ndbostder, vattenfrsrjning, sanitra tjnster och hlso-och sjukvrd till de mest utsatta befolkningsgrupperna som har flytt frn vpnade grupper eller tervndande personer som just har kommit tillbaka till sina byar men har frlorat alla sina godelar.
From May to December 2014, the project allowed assistance to be provided to approximately 1.3 million beneficiaries, mainly in North and South Kivu, Maniema and Province Orientale. 
Frn maj till december 2014 gjorde projektet att std kunde ges till nra 1,3 miljoner stdmottagare, frmst i Nordkivu och Sydkivu, Maniema och Province Orientale.
On average, 35 % of the interventions took place within 30 days of the movement of population alert compared to a target of 40 %. 
I genomsnitt gjordes 35 % av insatserna inom 30 dagar frn det att beskedet om folkfrflyttningen kom jmfrt med mlet p 40 %.
Despite partial achievement of some initial targets, this project was judged successful considering the context in which it is implemented and the number of beneficiaries reached. 
Trots att en del ursprungliga mlvrden endast uppnddes delvis bedmde kommissionen att projektet var framgngsrikt med tanke p de frhllanden det genomfrdes under och antalet mottagare som nddes.
Observations 26 Rapid Response to Movements of Population: distribution of NFI in Lulingu, Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Iakttagelser 26 Snabba insatser vid folkfrflyttningar: utdelning av andra artiklar n livsmedel Klla: Europeiska revisionsrtten.
47 In some of the cases where the Commission’s assessment was positive despite partial achievement of the targets, it did not provide enough explanation to substantiate its position. 
47 I vissa fall dr bedmningen var positiv trots att mlvrdena endast hade uppntts delvis frklarade inte kommissionen tillrckligt vad som lg till grund till denna stndpunkt.
In four cases we found that the assessment of the overall project achievement and of the partner’s performance was inadequate and did not provide a clear conclusion on the project. 
I fyra fall konstaterade vi att bedmningen av projektens vergripande resultat och av partnerns resultat var otillrcklig och saknade en tydlig slutsats om projektet.
Consequently, a clear logical link between the Commission’s overall conclusion on the project and the results achieved could not be established. 
Det innebar att det inte gick att gra en tydlig logisk koppling mellan kommissionens vergripande slutsats om projektet och de uppndda resultaten.
48 For the projects examined, one was found to have unsatisfactory results (see Box 5). 
48 Av de granskade projekten var det ett som hade otillfredsstllande resultat (se ruta 5).
Contractually, the Commission can reduce its contribution in the cases of poor, partial or late implementation of a project, without acceptable justifications provided by the partner. 
Enligt kontraktet fr kommissionen minska sitt bidrag om ett projekt genomfrs dligt, endast delvis eller frsenat om partnerna inte lmnar en godtagbar motivering till det.
This option was used for one case with unsatisfactory results but is seldom used as it is cumbersome to implement and could result in the loss of budgeted funds. 
Kommissionen anvnde det alternativet i ett fall d resultatet var otillfredsstllande, men gr det sllan eftersom det r krngligt att tillmpa och kan leda till att budgetmedel gr frlorade.
Thus, in case of unsatisfactory results and/ or partner’s performance, the Commission’s preferred option was to reduce the subsequent year’s contribution28 or to stop the collaboration with the partners29. Shabunda territory, South Kivu, people retrieving their goods 28 This was the case for at least two partners in 2015. 
Om resultaten och/eller partnerns arbetsinsats var otillfredsstllande valde kommissionen i frsta hand att minska det pfljande rets bidrag28 eller avbryta samarbetet med partnern29. i Lulingu, Shabundaterritoriet, Sydkivu, mnniskor som hmtar varor 28 Det var fallet med tminstone tv partner 2015.
29 For instance, in the selection process for 2015, three requests for funding were rejected by ECHO partly because of implementation problems identified during ECHO’s monitoring of previously funded projects. Picture 3 
29 T.ex. vid urvalsfrfarandet 2015 avslogs tre finansieringsanskningar av GD Humanitrt bistnd och civilskydd (Echo), delvis p grund av problem med genomfrandet som hade konstaterats vid Echos vervakning av tidigare finansierade projekt. Bilda 3
Observations 27 Spontaneous Site Management and Coordination in the DRC (n°18) This project was initiated in 2013 and funded by the Commission with an amount of 2 million euros. 
Iakttagelser 27 Spontan frvaltning och samordning av omrden i Demokratiska republiken Kongo (projekt nr 18) Projektet inleddes 2013 och fick tv miljoner euro i finansiering av kommissionen.
The funding for this partner reached 3 million euros by the end of 2015. 
I slutet av 2015 uppgick finansieringen till denna partner till tre miljoner euro.
The project’s objectives were: (1) to gather and disseminate information on the managed sites; (2) to manage and coordinate the provision of assistance such as water, sanitation, shelter and non-food items; (3) to digitally register the IDPs in the managed sites. 
Projektet hade fljande ml: 1) Samla in och sprida information om de frvaltade omrdena. 2) Frvalta och samordna std som vatten, sanitra tjnster, ndbostder och andra artiklar n livsmedel. 3) Digitalt registrera internflyktingarna inom de frvaltade omrdena.
The target values for (1) and (2) were eventually reached but due to a delay in procuring equipment the supply of non-food items was delayed by 14 months. 
Mlvrdena fr ml nr 1 och 2 uppnddes till slut, men p grund av frseningar i upphandlingen av utrustning frsenades leveransen av andra artiklar n livsmedel med 14 mnader.
For (3) the digital registration was delayed by 10 months and reached only 25 % of the targeted number. 
Nr det gller ml nr 3 frsenades den digitala registreringen med tio mnader och ndde endast 25 % av mlvrdet.
Only 24 % of the beneficiaries expected to be covered by the whole project were reached. 
Projektet ndde endast 24 % av det antal stdmottagare som det frvntades omfatta som helhet.
ECHO considered that the performance of the partner was not satisfactory: its project management skills were limited, the administrative procedures were cumbersome and its monitoring of the implementing partner was insufficient. 
GD Humanitrt bistnd och civilskydd (Echo) ansg att partnerns arbetsinsats var otillfredsstllande: kunskaperna i projektledning var begrnsade, de administrativa frfarandena var krngliga och vervakningen av genomfrandepartnern var otillrcklig.
All this negatively impacted the outcome of the action. 
Allt detta hade en negativ effekt p tgrdens utfall.
Despite the unsatisfactory implementation, the Commission reduced its contribution by 57 000 euros only. 
Trots det otillfredsstllande genomfrandet minskade kommissionen sitt bidrag med endast 57 000 euro.
Furthermore, the partner was contracted again the subsequent year but for a lower amount of contribution. 
Partnern anlitades dessutom igen det pfljande ret men fick d ett lgre bidragsbelopp.
The Commission also identified ineligible expenditure but given that the total amount of eligible expenditure was still higher than the Commission’s maximum contribution, this did not impact the amount of the contribution paid. 
Kommissionen upptckte ocks icke stdberttigande utgifter, men det inverkade inte p det bidragsbelopp som betalades ut eftersom det totala beloppet p de stdberttigande utgifterna fortfarande var hgre n kommissionens maxbidrag.
49 For the only contract in the selection awarded following a tendering procedure, ECHO Flight (n°16), more than 10 500 people and 250 tons of merchandise in the DRC30 were transported from May 2014 to March 2015 (11 months). 
49 Inom det enda kontrakt i urvalet som tilldelades efter ett anbudsfrfarande, nmligen projektet Echo Flight (projekt nrĄ16), transporterades mer n 10 500 mnniskor och 250 ton varor i Demokratiska republiken Kongo30 frn maj 2014 till mars 2015 (11 mnader).
Through this contract, the Commission ensured its partners, and their cargo, secure and rapid access to remote locations which would otherwise be virtually impossible to access. 
Via kontraktet garanterade kommissionen sina partner och deras varor ett skert och snabbt tilltrde till avlgsna platser som det skulle vara praktiskt taget omjligt att n fram till p annat stt.
It thus provided humanitarian assistance to vulnerable population and fulfilled one of the main priorities in the HIP. 
P s stt tillhandahll kommissionen humanitrt bistnd till utsatta befolkningar och uppfyllde en av huvudprioriteringarna i planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd.
30 The contract provides with air transport services for cargo and humanitarian actors also in Kenya and other locations when needed (Mali, Chad, etc.). 
30 Kontraktet innebr att luft-transporttjnster tillhandahlls aktrer inom flygfrakt och humanitra aktrer ven i Kenya och andra platser vid behov (Mali, Tchad m.fl.).
Observations 28 The Commission was responsive to changes but could better justify time extensions granted 50 About half31 of the projects in the audit sample were implemented over a longer period than initially planned, from 2 to 6 months, or with more budget (see details in Annex VI). 
Iakttagelser 28 Kommissionen var lyhrd fr frndringar men skulle ha kunnat motivera de frlngningar av projektens varaktighet som beviljats bttre 50 Ungefr hlften31 av projekten i granskningsurvalet varade mellan tv och sex mnader lngre n vad som var planerat frn brjan eller fick en strre budget (nrmare uppgifter finns i bilaga VI).
Five out of seven time extensions, without budget increase, were granted in cases of budget under-consumption, related to delays in implementation mainly justified by external factors. 
Fem av sju frlngningar av varaktigheten utan en kad budget beviljades om budgeten var underutnyttjad p grund av frseningar i genomfrandet som frmst frklarades av externa faktorer.
Most of the increases in budget, five out of seven, were related to additional needs resulting from the deterioration of the situation or the lack of stabilisation. 
De flesta av budgetkningarna, nmligen fem av sju, gllde ytterligare behov p grund av att situationen hade frsmrats eller bristande stabilitet.
51 In one case, the main reason for the extension was to give the partner additional time to ‘organise the transition from the Commission funding to another mechanism’. 
51 I ett fall var det frmsta sklet till frlngningen att partnern skulle f mer tid till att hantera vergngen frn kommissionens finansiering till en annan mekanism.
The Commission itself acknowledged in the assessment of the modification request submitted by the partner that it had ‘not prioritised this project for 2014’32. 
Kommissionen medgav sjlv i bedmningen av partnerns ndringsanskan att den Óinte hade prioriterat projektet 2014Ó32.
52 In two cases, the extensions were granted when the implementation delays were mainly the partners’ responsibility. 
52 I tv fall beviljades frlngningarna nr frseningarna i genomfrandet frmst var partnernas ansvar.
In those cases, the Commission decided not to recover part of the funding and not to reallocate this to other projects (see paragraph 48). 
I de fallen beslutade kommissionen att inte tervinna en del av finansieringen och inte omfrdela den till andra projekt (se punkt 48).