natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The directive also strengthens the rights of service recipients, particularly consumers, by prohibiting discrimination on the basis of nationality or residency. 
Direktivet strker ocks tjnstemot-tagarnas, srskilt konsumenternas, rttigheter genom att frbjuda diskriminering p grundval av nationalitet eller bosttningsort.
07 The obstacles which the Directive is intended to eliminate include10: (a) discriminatory requirements based directly or indirectly on nationality or, in the case of companies, the location of their registered offices; (b) prohibition for a provider to have establishment in more than one MS or on being entered in the registers or enrolled with professional bodies or associations in more than one MS; 7 Corazza Bildt report on the internal market for services: state of play and next steps (2012/2144(INI) (http://www. europarl.europa.eu/sides/ getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP// TEXT+REPORT+A7-2013-0273+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN). 
07 Direktivet syftar till att undanrja bland annat fljande hinder10: a) Diskriminerande krav som direkt eller indirekt grundar sig p nationalitet eller, i frga om fretag, platsen fr dess ste. b) Frbud fr en tjnsteleverantr mot att vara etablerad i flera medlemsstater eller vara registrerad vid eller vara medlem av en yrkesorganisation eller en branschorganisation i mer n en medlemsstat.
8 Cofferati report on single market governance within the European semester 2014 (2013/2194(INI)) (http://www. europarl.europa.eu/sides/ getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP// TEXT+REPORT+A7-2014-0066+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN). 
8 Cofferatis betnkande om styrning av den inre marknaden inom den europeiska planeringsterminen 2014 (2013/2194(INI)) (http://www.europarl.europa. eu/sides/getDoc. do?pubRef=-//EP// TEXT+REPORT+A7-2014Đ 0066+0+DOC+XML+V0//SV).
9 Note on the Commission’s 2014 work plan for reporting on national reforms in services markets, 5431/14, Compet 29, MI 51, Council of the European Union, Brussels, 22 January 2014. 
9 Not om kommissionens arbetsplan fr 2014 fr rapportering om nationella reformer p tjnste-marknaderna, 5431/14, COMPET 29, MI 51, Europeiska unionens rd, Bryssel, 22.1.2014.
10 As described in Article 14 of the Directive. 
10 Ssom beskrivs i artikel 14 i direktivet.
Introduction 10 (c) an obligation on the provider to have its principal establishment in the recipient territory; (d) conditions of reciprocity with the MS in which the provider already has an establishment; (e) conditions of passing an economic-needs or market-demand test for obtaining authorisation, or mandatory assessment of potential or current economic effects of the activity, or assessment of the appropriateness of the activity in relation to the economic planning objectives set by the competent authority; (f) involvement of competing operators, including within consultative bodies, in the process of granting authorisations or in the adoption of other relevant decisions of competent authorities; (g) financial guarantees, including any obligation to obtain insurance policies from a provider or body established in the recipient territory; (h) obligation to have been pre-registered for a given period in the registers in the MS or to have previously exercised the activity for a given period in their territory. 
Inledning 10 c) En skyldighet fr tjnsteleverantren att frlgga sin huvudsakliga verksamhet till mottagarterritoriumet. d) Krav p msesidighet med den medlemsstat dr tjnsteleverantren redan r etablerad. e) En ekonomisk prvning dr tillstndsgivningen r beroende av att man kan pvisa att det finns ett ekonomiskt behov eller en efterfrgan p marknaden, eller av att man utvrderar verksamhetens potentiella eller aktuella ekonomiska effekter eller bedmer om verksamheten stmmer verens med mlen i den behriga myndighetens ekonomiska planering. f) Inblandning av konkurrerande aktrer, ven inom rdgivande organ, vid beviljandet av tillstnd eller d de behriga myndigheterna antar andra beslut. g) Skyldighet att stlla eller bidra till en ekonomisk skerhet eller att ta en frskring hos tjnsteleverantrer eller organ som r etablerade p mottagarterritoriet. h) Skyldighet att under en viss tid ha varit frhandsregistrerad i registren i medlemsstaten eller att tidigare under en viss tid ha bedrivit verksamheten dr.
Roles and responsibilities 08 The directive sets out the roles and responsibilities of the Commission and the MSs. 
Uppgifter och ansvarsomrden 08 I direktivet faststlls kommissionens och medlemsstaternas uppgifter och ansvarsomrden.
09 MSs are responsible for transposing the Directive into their legislation and a number of tasks regarding the following-up of the transposition through mutual evaluation (see paragraphs 21 to 29) and for facilitating assistance to businesses by setting up PSCs. 
09 Medlemsstaterna r ansvariga fr att infrliva direktivet i sin lagstiftning, fullgra ett antal uppgifter avseende uppfljningen av infrlivandet genom msesidig utvrdering (se punkterna 21Đ29) och underltta stdet till fretag genom att inrtta gemensamma kontaktpunkter.
This is the first time that MSs have been legally obliged to put in place such e-government services and make them available for cross-border users. 
Detta r frsta gngen som medlemsstaterna har varit rttsligt skyldiga att infra sdana e-frvaltningstjnster och gra dem tillgngliga fr anvndare i andra lnder.
Introduction 11 10 Solvit is a dispute resolution mechanism that has been set up to help EU citizens and businesses who have been denied the possibility to exercise internal market rights because a public administration in another MS has misapplied internal market legislation. 
Inledning 11 10 Solvit r en mekanism fr tvistlsning som upprttats fr att hjlpa EU:s medborgare och fretag som inte har haft mjlighet att gra sina rttigheter p den inre marknaden gllande p grund av att en myndighet i en annan medlemsstat har tillmpat lagstiftningen om den inre marknaden p ett felaktigt stt.
The system operates through a network of Solvit centres based in the national administration of each MS. Solvit is a practical alternative to formal problem-solving mechanisms such as national court procedures or complaints to the European Commission. 
Systemet fungerar genom ett ntverk av Solvit-centrum som r baserade i varje medlemsstats nationella frvaltning. Solvit r ett praktiskt alternativ till formella problemlsningsmekanismer, ssom nationella domstolsfrfaranden eller klagoml till Europeiska kommissionen.
11 DG Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (previously DG Internal Market and Services) coordinates the Commission’s policy on the EU single market and seeks the removal of unjustified obstacles to trade, in particular in the field of services and financial markets. 
11 Generaldirektoratet fr inre marknaden, industri, entreprenrskap samt sm och medelstora fretag (tidigare generaldirektoratet fr inre marknaden och tjnster) samordnar kommissionens politik fr den inre marknaden och frsker undanrja omotiverade handelshinder, srskilt i frga om tjnster och finansiella marknader.
It should monitor how EU law is being implemented in practice, assist MSs and initiate infringement procedures when necessary. 
Det ska vervaka hur EU:s lagstiftning genomfrs i praktiken, bist medlemsstaterna och inleda vertrdelsefrfaranden nr s krvs.
This was broken down into two sub-questions, as follows. (a) Has the Commission adequately monitored and evaluated the implementation of the Directive? (b) Has the Commission sufficiently facilitated and enforced the implementation of the Directive? 
Denna frga delades upp i tv delfrgor: a) Har kommissionen p ett tillfredsstllande stt vervakat och utvrderat genomfrandet av direktivet? b) Har kommissionen p ett tillrckligt stt underlttat genomfrandet av direktivet och sett till att det tillmpas?
13 Interviews and examination of files were carried out at the Commission. 
13 Intervjuer och granskning av akter genomfrdes vid kommissionen.
Moreover, the audit included fact-finding visits to a range of responsible ministries, business organisations, chambers of commerce and consumer bodies in seven MSs to collect information on remaining obstacles to trade and the effectiveness of existing mechanisms for their elimination. 
Vi gjorde ocks faktainsamlingsbesk vid en rad ansvariga ministerier, fretagsorganisa-tioner, handelskammare och konsumentorgan i sju medlemsstater fr att samla information om terstende hinder fr handel och om ndamlsenligheten i befintliga mekanismer fr att undanrja dem.
The Court selected MSs with significant cross-border trade: Germany, the United Kingdom, Austria, Slovakia, France, the Netherlands and Portugal. 
Vi valde ut medlemsstater med en betydande grnsverskridande handel: Tyskland, Storbritannien, sterrike, Slovakien, Frankrike, Nederlnderna och Portugal.
In addition, a number of European organisations were also consulted. 
Dessutom konsulterade vi ett antal europeiska organisationer.
Observations 13 14 Following the end of the transposition process in 2009, the Commission tried to identify areas in which the Directive had not been implemented while also setting up several mechanisms to reduce the remaining barriers. 
Iakttagelser 13 14 Nr infrlivandeprocessen var ver 2009 frskte kommissionen identifiera omrden dr direktivet inte hade genomfrts och inrttade samtidigt flera mekanismer fr att minska de terstende hindren.
However, barriers persist, some of which are due to vague drafting in the Directive. 
Hinder kvarstr dock och en del av dem beror p vaga formuleringar i direktivet.
The Commission has been reluctant to take infringement measures partly due to a lack of solidity in the legal base and partly due to the length of time necessary for such a legal procedure to enforce compliance (several years even if exchanges are made on time). 
Kommissionen har varit ovillig att vidta vertrdelsetgrder dels p grund av att den rttsliga grunden inte r tillrckligt solid, dels p grund av den tid det tar innan ett rttsligt frfarande leder till att efterlevnad tvingas fram (flera r ven om utbyten sker i tid).
15 It is not yet possible to evaluate the extent to which the expected economic benefits of the Directive have been realised. 
15 Det gr nnu inte att bedma i vilken utstrckning de frvntade ekonomiska frdelarna med direktivet har frverkligats.
While the Commission has published estimates on potential GDP gains from the Directive, this was estimated on the basis of approximated data. 
Kommissionen har offentliggjort berkningar av potentiella BNP-kningar till fljd av direktivet, men de byggde p ungefrliga uppgifter.
Transposition and monitoring of implementation The Commission assisted and monitored the transposition 16 The Directive entered into force on 28 December 2006 and set the deadline for transposition at 28 December 2009. 
Infrlivande och vervakning av genomfrandet Kommissionen hjlpte till vid och vervakade infrlivandet 16 Direktivet trdde i kraft den 28 december 2006 och faststllde tidsfristen fr infrlivande till den 28 december 2009.
The transposition was an onerous exercise for MSs, covering legislation on a large number of economic activities and therefore the Directive allowed 3 years instead of the usual 2. 
Infrlivandet var betungande fr medlemsstaterna eftersom det omfattade lagstiftning om ett stort antal ekonomiska verksamheter, och drfr freskrev direktivet en infrlivandeperiod p tre r i stllet fr p de sedvanliga tv ren.
17 The Commission published the Handbook on the implementation of the Services Directive, which aimed to provide MSs with technical assistance by describing appropriate approaches to implementation. 
17 Kommissionen offentliggjorde Handbok om genomfrandet av tjnstedirektivet, som syftade till att ge medlemsstaterna tekniskt std genom att beskriva lmpliga genomfrandemetoder.
However, it only became available in all languages almost a year after the approval of the Directive11. 
Den blev dock inte tillgnglig p alla sprk frrn nstan ett r efter det att direktivet hade antagits11.
Representatives of MSs visited reported that the handbook was a useful aid, though they considered that its impact would have been greater had it been available soon after the Directive had entered into force. 
Fretrdare fr de medlemsstater som vi beskte rapporterade att handboken var till vrdefull hjlp men ansg att den skulle ha ftt strre genomslag om den hade varit tillgnglig kort tid efter direktivets ikrafttrdande.
In addition to the handbook, the Commission provided advice to MSs through monitoring visits and responding to their queries. 
Jmte handboken gav kommissionen medlemsstaterna rd genom att gra vervakningsbesk och svara p deras frfrgningar.
11 All language versions were published on the internet in November 2007, with only the English language version being available as of 30 July 2007. 
11 Alla sprkversioner offentliggjordes p internet i november 2007 utom den engelska som fanns tillgnglig frn den 30 juli 2007.
Observations 14 18 Through bilateral work and support given to MSs, the Commission took the necessary steps to monitor progress in transposition and reported on it to the Competitiveness Council. 
Iakttagelser 14 18 Genom bilateralt arbete och std till medlemsstaterna vidtog kommissionen de ndvndiga tgrderna fr att vervaka framstegen med infrlivandet och rapporterade om det till rdet (konkurrenskraft).
In June 2012 it issued a more comprehensive report in the form of the services package12. 
I juni 2012 offentliggjorde den en mer omfattande rapport i form av ÓtjnstepaketetÓ12.
Twenty Member States were late with transposition 19 The deadline for transposition was only met by eight MSs13. 
20 medlemsstater var sena med infrlivandet 19 Endast tta medlemsstater hll tidsfristen fr infrlivandet13.
Letters of formal notice were sent to the MSs that had not notified transposition, signalling the start of infringement procedures. 
Formella underrttelser skickades till de medlemsstater som inte hade gjort anmlan om infrlivande med information om att vertrdelsefrfaranden skulle inledas.
On 27 October 2011, the three cases14 which had not in the meantime been resolved were referred to the Court of Justice. 
Den 27 oktober 2011 hnskts de tre renden14 som nnu inte hade lsts till domstolen.
These cases were, however, resolved before being considered by the Court. 
De lstes dock innan domstolen hade brjat behandla dem.
The last MS to complete the transposition was Greece on 31 May 2012. 
Den medlemsstat som genomfrde infrlivandet sist var Grekland den 31 maj 2012.
20 The Commission envisaged that the PSCs (see paragraphs 44 to 55) would play a significant role in the implementation of the Directive. 
20 Kommissionen rknade med att de gemensamma kontaktpunkterna (se punkterna 44Đ55) skulle spela en viktig roll i genomfrandet av direktivet.
The Commission therefore gave them prominence in its reporting on MSs’ progress on implementation, relying on its own analysis as well as on studies made by business organisations. 
Den gav dem drfr en framskjuten stllning i sin rapportering om medlemsstaternas framsteg med genomfrandet och frlitade sig p sin egen analys och p studier som gjorts av fretagsorganisationer.
By the 2009 deadline, 21 out of 27 MSs had established ‘first-generation’ PSCs15, though the degree to which administrative procedures could be completed online, and used cross-border, varied. Mutual evaluations were an innovative practice, managed well by the Commission and subsequently also used for other directives 21 The mutual evaluation exercise foreseen in the Directive required each MS to assess the justifications for national requirements on service providers and then to share their findings with other MSs. 
Nr tidsfristen lpte ut 2009 hade 21 av de 27 medlemsstaterna inrttat Ófrsta generationensÓ gemensamma kontaktpunkter15, men i vilken omfattning administrativa frfaranden kunde fullgras online och anvndas ver grnserna varierade. msesidiga utvrderingar var ett innovativt tillvgagngsstt som kommissionen sktte vl och senare ocks anvnde i samband med andra direktiv 21 Enligt det frfarande fr msesidig utvrdering som freskrivs i direktivet skulle varje medlemsstat bedma motiveringarna till nationella krav p tjnsteleverantrer och sedan dela med sig av sina synpunkter till andra medlemsstater.
Its purpose was to increase understanding of the reasons underlying the requirements in place and to encourage MSs to compare their regulatory approaches and share best practices, removing requirements which are agreed to be unjustified. 
Syftet var att ka frstelsen fr sklen till de krav som hade infrts och att uppmuntra medlemsstaterna att jmfra sina regleringsstrategier och utbyta bsta praxis, s att krav som ansgs omotiverade kunde avskaffas.
12 COM (2012) 261 final of 8 June 2012, ‘A partnership for new growth in services 2012-2015’ and supporting documents. 
12 COM(2012) 261 final, 8.6.2012 Ett partnerskap fr ny tillvxt i tjnstesektorn 2012Đ2015 och tfljande handlingar.
13 Czech Republic, Estonia. Croatia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Netherlands, Sweden. 
13 Tjeckien, Estland, Kroatien, Litauen, Ungern, Malta, Nederlnderna och Sverige.
14 Germany (closed 26.1.2012), Austria (closed 26.4.2012), Greece (closed 31.5.2012). 
14 Tyskland (rendet avskrevs 26.1.2012), sterrike (rendet avskrevs 26.4.2012) och Grekland (rendet avskrevs 31.5.2012).
15 First generation PSCs comply with the limited requirements set out in the Directive. 
15 Frsta generationens gemensamma kontaktpunkter uppfyller de begrnsade krav som anges i direktivet.
Second generation PSCs ‘should not only meet the obligations of the Services Directive but go beyond them, both in scope and functionality’, according to the PSC charter. 
Andra generationens gemensamma kontaktpunkter skulle, enligt stadgan fr gemensamma kontaktpunkter, inte bara fullgra skyldigheterna i tjnstedirektivet utan g nnu lngre, bde i frga om rckvidd och funktionalitet.
Observations 15 22 The directive set out the process and requirements for the mutual evaluations of the regulatory framework applicable to services activities in the MSs. 
Iakttagelser 15 22 I direktivet faststlls processen och kraven fr de msesidiga utvrderingarna av den lagstiftning som gller tjnsteverksamheter i medlemsstaterna.
By 28 December 2009 the MSs had to present a report to the Commission containing information on: (i) authorisation schemes, (ii) specific national requirements the MSs intend to maintain and (iii) multidisciplinary activities. 
Senast den 28 december 2009 skulle medlemsstaterna verlmna en rapport till kommissionen med information om i) tillstndsfrfaranden, ii) specifika nationella krav som medlemsstaterna avsg att behlla och iii) verksamheter p flera olika omrden.
The MSs had to provide explanations showing the compatibility of the remaining authorisation schemes or requirements with the substance of the Directive, justify why those requirements complied with the conditions of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality, as well as indicate which providers remained subject to such requirements. 
Medlemsstaterna mste lmna frklaringar som visade att de terstende tillstndsfrfarandena eller kraven var frenliga med direktivet, motivera varfr kraven uppfyllde villkoren fr icke-diskriminering, ndvndighet och proportionalitet samt ange vilka tjnsteleverantrer som omfattades av kraven.
23 The Commission shared the explanations on requirements with the other MSs, giving them 6 months to respond. 
23 Kommissionen gjorde frklaringarna om villkor tillgngliga fr de vriga medlemsstaterna och gav dem en tidsfrist p sex mnader fr att lmna synpunkter.
The Commission then completed a report on the mutual evaluation process on 28 December 2010, having coordinated MSs’ responses, accompanied where appropriate by proposals for additional initiatives. 
Drefter sammanstllde kommissionen en rapport om frfarandet fr msesidig utvrdering den 28 december 2010, efter att ha samordnat medlemsstaternas svar, med i frekommande fall frslag till ytterligare initiativ.
This was first done in the form of the services package, published in June 2012 and then through initiatives such as peer review on legal form, shareholding and tariff requirements, evaluation of national regulations on access to professions and access to insurance stakeholders workshops. 
Det skedde frsta gngen i form av tjnstepaketet, som offentliggjordes i juni 2012, och drefter genom initiativ som inbrdes utvrdering av krav rrande juridisk form, kapitalinnehav och prisstruktur, utvrdering av nationella bestmmelser om tilltrde till yrken och tillgng till workshoppar fr berrda frskringsaktrer.
24 The success of the mutual evaluation exercise in screening multiple MSs’ legislation was such that this practice has later been emulated in other fields such as the revised professional qualifications directive. 
24 Frfarandet fr msesidig utvrdering gick s pass bra nr det gllde att underska mnga medlemsstaters lagstiftning att man sedermera tog efter detta tillvgagngsstt p andra omrden, till exempel i frga om det ndrade direktivet om yrkeskvalifikationer.
25 The mutual evaluation methodology consisted of the following steps16: individual MSs’ self-assessments, discussions in clusters of five MSs and plenary meetings with all MSs. 
25 Den metod som anvndes vid den msesidiga utvrderingen bestod av fljande steg16: sjlvbedmningar av de enskilda medlemsstaterna, diskussioner i grupper om fem medlemsstater och plenarmten med alla medlemsstater.
The Commission noted the improvements achieved, such as the replacement of cross-cutting authorisation schemes with less burdensome methods such as declarations and the abolition of sector-specific schemes, minimum capital requirements, bans on having more than one establishment, compulsory tariffs and quantitative and territorial restrictions17. 
Kommissionen noterade de framsteg som gjordes, till exempel att tillstndsfrfaranden som berrde mnga olika tjnsteverksamheter ersattes med mindre betungande metoder som deklarationer och avskaffande av sektorspecifika system, minimi-kapitalkrav, frbud mot att ha mer n en etablering, obligatoriska avgifter och kvantitativa och geografiska begrnsningar17.
16 COM(2011) 20 final of 27 January 2011, ’Towards a better functioning single market for services building on the results of the mutual evaluations process of the Services Directive’, p. 
16 KOM(2011) 20 slutlig, 27.1.2011, Mot en bttre fungerande inre marknad fr tjnster Đ bygga vidare p resultaten av den msesidiga utvrderingen av tjnstedirektivet, s.
17 SEC(2011) 102 final of 27 January 2011, ‘Commission staff working paper on the process of the mutual evaluation of the Services Directive — Accompanying document to COM(2011) 20 final’, p. 
17 SEK(2011) 102 slutlig, 27.1.2011, arbetsdokument frn kommissionens avdelningar om frfarandet fr msesidig utvrdering i tjnstedirektivet, fljedokument till KOM(2011) 20 slutlig, s.
Observations 16 26 Significant steps were made towards the removal of barriers. 
Iakttagelser 16 26 Viktiga steg mot att undanrja hinder togs.
Officials in the MSs visited considered the mutual evaluation process to be one of the highlights of the implementation of the Directive due to the fact that the MSs had to cooperate intensively in screening very large amounts of national and regional legislation, to assess its compatibility with the Directive and the existing case-law of the Court of Justice. 
Tjnstemn i de medlemsstater som vi beskte ansg att frfarandet fr msesidig utvrdering var en av hjdpunk-terna i genomfrandet av direktivet eftersom medlemsstaterna mste samarbeta nra med varandra nr de skulle underska mycket stora mngder nationell och regional lagstiftning och bedma dess frenlighet med direktivet och domstolens befintliga rttspraxis.