natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The aim was to verify that the description and quantity of the goods according to the container company, matched that on the refund claim and that the goods were removed from the container at the destination declared on the refund claim. 
Syftet var att verifiera att containerbolagets beskrivning av varorna och deras kvantitet stmde verens med uppgifterna p bidragsanskan, och att varorna lastades ur containern p den bestmmelseort som uppgivits p bidragsanskan.
Some Member States (Germany, Greece, France, Italy, and Sweden) provided the information requested. 
Vissa medlemsstater (Tyskland, Grekland, Frankrike, Italien och Sverige) tillhandahll den begrda informationen.
However, the United Kingdom did not consider that the Court had the right to ask Member States to obtain and supply information which they did not hold for their own purposes, the Netherlands did not obtain all of the information because of the demand on its resources and Denmark took over four months to provide incomplete information. 
Frenade kungariket ansg emellertid inte att revisionsrtten hade rtt att krva av medlemsstaterna att dessa skall skaffa fram och tillhandahlla information som de inte r i besittning av fr egna syften, Nederlnderna kunde inte skaffa fram all information p grund av att landets resurser var anstrngda och Danmark behvde ver fyra mnader fr att skaffa fram information som inte var fullstndig.
Based on the information received at that time, some 5 % of the cases required follow up by Member States (Germany, France, Italy and Austria) because prima facie the container numbers were incorrect or the movement details did not match those on the refund claim. 
P grundval av den information som d hade erhllits erfordrades uppfljning av medlemsstater (Tyskland, Frankrike, Italien och sterrike) i ungefr 5 % av fallen, eftersom containernumren vid frsta anblicken var felaktiga eller uppgifterna om frflyttningar inte stmde verens med dem p bidragsanskan.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 84. 
SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 84.
Some major weaknesses have been found in the approval and control of supervisory companies and in the system of issue of proofs by Member Statesе embassies. 
Ngra betydande svagheter har konstaterats i godknnandet och kontrollen av kontroll-och vervakningsfretag och i det system dr medlemsstaters ambassader utfrdar bevis.
Many irregularities and suspected frauds have been uncovered by OLAF and at the initiative of DG AGRI. 
Mnga oegentligheter och misstnkta bedrgerier har avsljats av OLAF och p initiativ av DG AGRI.
The Courtеs audit has revealed further suspected irregularities. 
Revisionsrttens granskning har avsljat nnu fler misstnkta oegentligheter.
Little reliance can therefore be placed on the system of proofs of arrival (1) (see paragraphs 17 to 80). 
Det finns drfr inte anledning att hysa ngon strre tilltro fr systemet med ankomstbevis(1) (se punkterna 17Đ80).
This conclusion is all the more disturbing given (1) See also Annual Report on the 1987 financial year, where the Court concluded that, дWhile differentiated rates of refund apply, the Court has difficulty in envisaging any system of controls over proof of arrival which would provide sufficient safeguard against a determined attempt at fraudulent declarationе (OJ C 316, 12.12.1988). that the Commission has identified serious weaknesses in Member Statesе physical checks on the description and quantity of exported goods (see paragraph 8). 
Denna slutsats r desto mer oroande mot bak-(1) Se ven rsrapporten fr budgetret 1987 dr revisionsrtten drog slutsatsen att: ÓS lnge som differentierade bidrag tillmpas har revisionsrtten svrt att frestlla sig ngot kontrollsystem fr ankomstbevis som skulle utgra ett tillrckligt gott skydd mot ett beslutsamt frsk till bedrglig deklarationÓ (EGT C 316, 12.12.1988). grund av att kommissionen har identifierat allvarliga svagheter i medlemsstaternas fysiska kontroller av beskrivningar av och kvantiteter fr exporterade varor (se punkt 8).
It is important, however, to distinguish between the validity of the proofs and the genuineness of the transaction. 
Det r emellertid viktigt att skilja p bevisens giltighet och transaktionens kthet.
There is no evidence that the majority of transactions giving rise to refunds are not genuine commercial transactions. 
Det finns inga belgg fr att flertalet av de transaktioner som franleder bidrag inte skulle vara genuina affrs-transaktioner.
This calls into question the requirement for the systematic presentation of proofs of arrival. 
Detta ifrgastter kravet p systematiskt uppvisande av ankomstbevis.
Most of the irregularities and frauds have been detected after the proofs have been accepted by paying agencies. 
De flesta oegentligheterna och bedrgerierna har upptckts efter det att bevisen har accepterats av utbetalningsstllen.
However, the Court recognises that at the present time for various reasons, including existing trade agreements, this is not possible. 
Revisionsrtten r emellertid medveten om att detta fr nrvarande av olika skl, inklusive gllande handelsavtal, inte r mjligt.
If the requirement for the systematic presentation of proofs of arrival is perpetuated: б checks to be carried out for the issue of proofs by Member Statesе embassies should be the same as those for supervisory companies (see paragraphs 35 to 38), 2 () Article 17 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 3 (OJ L 102,17.4.1999, p. 
Om systemet med obligatoriskt framlggande av ankomstbevis vidmakthlls rekommenderar revisionsrtten fljande: Ń Kontrollerna fr utfrdande av bevis som skall utfras av medlemsstaternas ambassader br vara desamma som fr kontroll-och vervakningsfretagen (se punkterna 35Đ38). 2 () Artikel 17 i kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 800/1999 (EGT L 102, 3 17.4.1999, s.
11). () Council Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89 (OJ L 388, 30.12.1989, p. 
11). () Rdets frordning (EEG) nr 4045/89 (EGT L 388, 30.12.1989, s.
C 314/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.11.2001 б the Commission should take over the responsibility for the approval of supervisory companies (see paragraph 26) as is already the case for food aid, б whenanapprovaliswithdrawnfromasupervisorycompany it should apply to all companies within the same group (see paragraph 26), б consideration should be given to introducing penalties for irregular proofs of arrival issued by supervisory companies (see paragraph 17), б the Commission should be responsible for maintaining and updating files of model proofs of arrival which can be accepted and should coordinate verifications in non-member countries (see paragraph 13). 
C 314/16 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.11.2001 Ń Kommissionen br verta ansvaret fr att godknna kontroll-och vervakningsfretag (se punkt 26) vilket redan r fallet nr det gller livsmedelsbistnd.
The Commission and OLAF should ensure that when frauds and irregularities are detected they are followed up assiduously in all of the Member States concerned. 
89. Kommissionen och OLAF br se till att upptckta fall av bedrgeri och oegentligheter noggrant fljs upp i alla berrda medlemsstater.
The suspected irregularities identified in this report involve more than 100 million euro. 
De misstnkta oegentligheter som framkommit i denna rapport gller mer n 100 miljoner euro.
In other cases, such as the dismissal in Italy of the case concerning live animals to Lebanon, the Commission should consider action under the clearance of accounts procedure. 
I andra fall, s som avskrivningen av fallet med levande djur till Libanon i Italien, br kommissionen vervga tgrder inom frfarandet fr avslutande av rkenskaperna.
Finally, refunds should not be paid on products which are subject to reduced rates of import duty in non-member countries and in the EU under trade agreements where this creates the possibility of carousels (see paragraphs 59 to 64). 
Slutligen skall inte bidrag betalas fr produkter fr vilka icke-medlemslnder och stater inom EU tillmpar reducerade import-satser enligt handelsavtal nr detta skapar mjligheter till bedrgerikedjor (se punkterna 59Đ64).
Luxembourg at the Court meeting of 11 and 12 July 2001. 
Denna rapport har antagits av revisionsrtten vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 11 och 12 juli 2001.
8.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 314/17 ANNEX PRINCIPAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ISSUE OF PROOFS BY SUPERVISORY COMPANIES Article 16(5) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 The minimum requirements for the approval of international control and supervisory agencies are the following. (a) Control and supervisory agencies shall be approved at their request by the competent authorities of the Member States for a three-year period. 
8.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 314/17 BILAGA HUVUDSAKLIGA KRAV F R BEVIS UTFRDADE AV KONTROLL-OCH VERVAKNINGSF RETAG Artikel 16.5 i kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 800/1999 Minimivillkoren fr godknnande av fretag som p internationell niv r specialister p kontroll och vervakning skall vara fljande: a) P begran frn kontroll-och vervakningsfretagen skall dessa godknnas av de behriga myndigheterna i medlemsstaterna fr en period av tre r.
Approval shall be valid for all Member States. (b) Where the primary and secondary proofs referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 and point (c) of paragraph 2 are drawn up, the control and supervisory agencies shall carry out all the checks necessary to determine the nature, characteristics and quantity of the products mentioned in the certificate. 
Godknnandet skall glla i alla medlemsstater. b) Nr de bevis som nmns i punkterna 1 b och 2 c lggs fram skall kontroll-och vervakningsfretagen genomfra alla de kontroller som behvs fr att faststlla arten, egenskaperna och kvantiteten fr de produkter som nmns i intyget.
The checks shall be carried out on the spot at the moment of import, except in duly justified exceptional cases. (c) The control and supervisory agencies referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 and point (c) of paragraph 2 shall be independent of the parties involved in the transaction under scrutiny. 
Kontrollerna skall gras p platsen och d importen sker, utom i vederbrligen motiverade fall. c) De kontroll-och vervakningsfretag som avses i punkterna 1 b och 2 c skall vara fristende frn de parter som r involverade i den transaktion som kontrolleras.
In particular, neither the control and supervisory agency carrying out the controls for a particular transaction, nor any subsidiary company belonging to the same financial group, may take part in the operation as exporter, customs agent, carrier, consignee, warehousekeeper or in any other capacity likely to give rise to a conflict of interest. (d) Without prejudice to Article 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 and Article 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4045/ 89 (1), Member States shall inspect the activities of the control and supervisory agencies at regular intervals or when there is reason to doubt whether the conditions for approval have been observed. (e) Member States shall withdraw approval, wholly or partly, if it is found that the control and supervisory agency cannot any longer guarantee compliance with the conditions governing approval. 
Ett kontroll-eller vervakningsfretag som utfr en kontroll av en srskild transaktion, eller en filial som tillhr samma fretagsgrupp som detta, fr inte delta i denna kontroll i egenskap av exportr, tullspeditr, transportr, varumottagare, lagerhavare eller i ngon annan egenskap som kan ge upphov till intressekonf likter. d) Utan att det pverkar bestmmelserna i artikel 8 i frordning (EEG) nr 729/70 och i artikel 3 i rdets frordning (EEG) nr 4045/89 (1) skall medlemsstaterna kontrollera kontroll-och vervakningsfretagens verksamhet.
The Member State concerned shall immediately inform the other Member States and the Commission of the withdrawal of approval. 
Den berrda medlemsstaten skall utan drjsml informera vriga medlemsstater och kommissionen om att ett godknnande har dragits in.
The withdrawal shall be valid for all Member States. 
Om ett godknnande dras in skall detta glla i alla medlemsstater.
(1) OJ L 388, 30.12.1989, p. 
(1) EGT L 388, 30.12.1989, s.
C 314/18 EN Official Journal of the European Communities THE COMMISSIONеS REPLIES SUMMARY I. In order to understand the reasons why export refunds in the beef and the milk sector are differentiated, as well as the consequences of this in terms of the general economy of these sectors, the Commission, before answering the individual observations from the Court, wants to explain clearly the rationale of the system in place, present financial figures and stress that differentiated refund rates are very limited. б The Commission considers the present system fully justified: б differentiated export refunds are fixed at a lower rate than general refunds, reducing the cost to the EAGGF budget, б international commitments oblige the EU to refrain from introducing any measure that would have a consequence on the price level in trade (export refund as well as sale at reduced prices from intervention stocks) for beef to be exported to South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore and Malaysia (these countries are among the major beef importing countries in the world). 
C 314/18 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning KOMMISSIONENS SVAR SAMMANFATTNING I. Fr att man skall frst varfr exportbidraget i sektorn fr ntktt och mjlk r differentierat och konsekvenserna av detta fr sektorernas allmnna ekonomi vill kommissionen, innan den besvarar revisionsrttens enskilda iakttagelser, tydligt frklara den logiska grunden fr det befintliga systemet, presentera ekonomiska data och betona att differentierade bidragssatser har mycket begrnsad tillmpning.
Similarly in the milk sector, international agreements oblige us to pay lower or zero rates of refund to respect our international obligations in quantity and outlay terms (e.g. the EU eliminated the refunds for certain destinations on cheese, to reduce demand for export licences with refund and stay within the GATT limits). 
P liknande stt frpliktar internationella avtal i mjlksektorn till betalning av lgre bidragssatser, eller inga bidrag alls, fr att uppfylla vra internationella taganden rknat i kvantitet och utgifter. (EU avvecklade t.ex. bidragen till vissa destinationer fr ost fr att minska behovet av exportlicenser med bidrag och fr att hlla sig inom GATT:s grnser.)
But international agreements also enable the EU in some cases to pay lower refunds (e.g. milk products for Canada and the USA), б furthermore, the EU allows an annual import quota at preferential duties of 52 100 tonnes of bovine meat (deboned weight) from a number of ACP countries (Council Regulation (EC) No 1706/98, Article 4). 
Internationella avtal gr emellertid ocks att EU i vissa fall kan betala lgre bidrag (t.ex. mjlkprodukter till Kanada och Frenta staterna). Ń Dessutom medger EU enligt artikel 4 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 1706/98 en rlig importkvot till frmnstullar av 52 100 ton ntktt (urbenad vikt) frn ett antal AVS-lnder.
No export refunds are granted for those destinations. 
Inga exportbidrag beviljas fr dessa destinationer.
The consequence of this distinction between countries for which a refund can or cannot be granted is the appearance of a de facto differentiation. б The budgetary cost of the system should also be taken into consideration. б expenditure on export refunds has been substantially reduced over the past decade and this trend is continuing, б it plays an important role in stabilising the internal market of the EU and minimising the need to purchase into intervention. 
Ń Budgetkostnaden fr systemet br ocks tas med i berkningen. Ń Utgifternafrexportbidragharminskatbetydligtunderdetsenastertiondet,ochdentrendenfortst-ter. Ń Den har stor betydelse fr att stabilisera EU:s inre marknad och fr att minimera behovet av interven-tionskp.
In todayеs situation 1 tonne of meat (carcasse weight equivalent) being purchased into intervention generates a cost for the EAGGF of about EUR 1 900. 
I dagslget orsakar ett ton ktt (slaktviktsekvivalent) som kps fr intervention en kostnad fr EUGFJ av omkring 1 900 euro.
A similar example for the milk sector in May 2001 shows that 1 tonne of SMP generates a cost of EUR 500 to intervention whereas the same quantity can be disposed of for EUR 50 through export refunds. б For about 90 % by value of total exports of beef and milk a single refund rate applies. 
Exportbidraget fr samma kvantitet ntktt i form av slaktkropp av handjur r 970 euro. Ett liknande exempel frn mjlksektorn visar att ett ton skummjlkspulver i maj 2001 orsakar en kostnad av 500 euro fr intervention, medan samma kvantitet kan avyttras fr 50 euro genom exportbidrag.
For the remaining exports a substantially lower rate is applied, particularly for exports to the candidate countries. 
Ń Sammabidragssatstillmpaspomkring90%avvrdetavdentotalaexportenavntkttochmjlk.Fr terstoden av exporten tillmpas en vsentligt lgre sats, srskilt fr export till kandidatlnderna.
About 21 % of the total quantity of cheese and 7 % of the beef exported from the Community is exported without any refund. 
Omkring 21 % av all export av ost och 7 % av exporten av ntktt frn gemenskapen sker utan bidrag.
The Commission takes Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 to mean that where a single refund rate applies to all non-member countries, entitlement to a refund is acquired on leaving the customs territory of the Community. 
Kommissionen anser att rtten till exportbidrag enligt artikel 3 i frordning (EG) nr 800/1999 uppstr nr produkterna lmnar gemenskapens tullomrde om en enda bidragssats gller fr samtliga tredje lnder.
Where there are grounds for suspicion (serious doubt), however, the paying agency, before paying out the refund, may require evidence that the goods have been imported into a non-member country or undergone substantial working or processing. 8.11.2001 
I vissa mycket speciella fall (starkt tvivel) kan emellertid utbetalningsstllet innan exportbidraget betalas ut krva bevis p import till tredje land eller vsentlig behandling eller bearbetning. 8.11.2001
8.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 314/19 III. 
8.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 314/19 III.
The Commission has undertaken a specific audit in respect of proofs of arrival issued by supervisory companies. 
Kommissionen har gjort en srskild revision med avseende p ankomstbevis som utfrdats av kontroll-och vervakningsfretag.
For the reasons outlined in points 34 and 35 this audit was carried out in Germany, which was in practice the only Member State accepting such certificates on a large scale. 
Av skl som beskrivs i punkterna 34 och 35 gjordes revisionen i Tyskland, som i sjlva verket var den enda medlemsstat som godtog sdana intyg i stor skala.
The enquiry resulted in a financial correction of about EUR 20 million. 
Underskningen ledde till en finansiell rttelse av omkring 20 miljoner euro.
It is further true that the Commission has always evaluated proofs of arrival for transactions selected for testing under the clearance-of-accounts procedure. 
Det r vidare sant att kommissionen alltid har utvrderat ankomstbevis fr transaktioner som valts ut fr kontroll inom frfarandet fr avslutande av rkenskaper.
This evaluation has given rise to other financial corrections under past clearance exercises. 
Denna utvrdering har gett upphov till andra finansiella rttelser under tidigare avslutanden.
V. The approval conditions for supervisory companies will be evaluated during the ongoing audit (started in May 2001) on differentiated refunds carried out under the clearance of accounts. 
V. Villkoren fr godknnande av kontroll-och vervakningsfretag kommer att utvrderas under den pgende revisionen (pbrjad i maj 2001) av differentierade bidrag som genomfrs under avslutningen av rkenskaper.
When the Commission learned that a Member State had withdrawn approval from a company belonging to a particular group it asked Member States where other members of the group were located to check whether those companies exhibited the same shortcomings. 
Nr kommissionen har informerats om att en medlemsstat har dragit in godknnandet av ett kontroll-och vervakningsfretag som tillhr en grupp, har andra medlemsstater som har godknt dotterbolag till denna grupp inom sina territorier anmodats kontrollera om samma svagheter finns i dessa dotterbolag.
The Commission departments concerned have commenced talks with the Member States about the best way of aligning and improving practice regarding certification by embassies. 
Nr det gller intyg frn ambassader har kommissionen inlett en diskussion med medlemsstaterna om lmpligaste sttet att skapa en harmoniserad och mera tillfredsstllande metod.
According to the information received from the Court, the amount relates largely to suspected irregularities established in one Member State in the period 1994 to 1996 (EUR 60 million) and to irregular exports to Iraq after the embargo was imposed in 1991 (about EUR 40 million). 
Enligt upplysningar frn revisionsrtten hnfr sig beloppet i stort sett till misstnkta oegentligheter som konstaterats i en medlemsstat under perioden 1994Đ1996 (60 miljoner euro) och till olaglig export till Irak sedan embargot infrdes 1991 (cirka 40 miljoner euro).
The cases are being followed up by the Commission, and are being handled in accordance with the rules. 
Fallen har uppmrksammats av kommissionen, och de fljs upp enligt reglerna.
For the other cases appropriate action will be taken by the Commission. 
Nr det gller vriga fall kommer lmpliga tgrder att vidtas av kommissionen.
Relaxing the conditions for presenting proofs of arrival in the way recommended by the Court is not workable, because requiring proof of arrival only in cases of doubt, or for high-risk destinations, could lead to loss of control over exports to countries for which an export refund is not fixed. 
Det gr inte att lindra villkoren fr framlggande av ankomstbevis p det stt revisionsrtten rekommenderar. Om man krver ankomstbevis endast i tveksamma fall eller fr bestmmelseorter med hg riskniv, kan det finnas risk fr att man frlorar kontrollen ver exporten till lnder fr vilka exportbidrag inte faststlls.
It will also expose the Community to fundamental criticism of the way the EU monitors and controls its subsidised trade with non-member countries, particularly taking into consideration its international undertakings to refrain from granting export refunds for specific markets. 
Gemenskapen skulle ocks utsttas fr principiell kritik fr sitt stt att vervaka och kontrollera sin subventionerade handel med tredje lnder, speciellt med hnsyn till de internationella tagandena att avst frn att bevilja exportbidrag fr srskilda marknader.
Therefore, relaxing the requirements for proof of arrival is bound to generate a potential risk for the Community budget. б As a matter of priority, the Commission will discuss with the departments responsible for a posteriori checks how to include consultation of shipping and container movement databases in the audit programmes. 
Ń Kommissionen kommer att med frtur diskutera med de avdelningar som ansvarar fr kontroll i efterhand hur man kan f in konsultation av databaser ver skeppning och containerrrelser i revisionsprogrammen.
INTRODUCTION 2. 
INLEDNING 2.
The Commission takes Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 800/ 1999 to mean that entitlement to a (non-differentiated) refund is acquired on leaving the customs territory of the Community. 
Kommissionen anser att rtten till (icke-differentierat) exportbidrag enligt artikel 3 i frordning (EG) nr 800/1999 uppstr nr produkterna lmnar gemenskapens tullomrde.