natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thus these funds had no revolving effect and the management fees incurred thereupon, even though in accordance with the financial agreements, did not provide any added value to the EU budget (paragraph 70 to 73). 
Dessa medel hade drfr inte ngon revolverande effekt, och de uppkomna frvaltningsavgifterna fljde visserligen de finansiella verenskommelserna men gav inget mervrde fr EU-budgeten (punkterna 70Đ73).
Ľ Contractual advances also helped improve absorption. 
Ľ Kontraktsenliga frskott hjlpte ocks till att frbttra utnyttjandet.
However for projects approved towards the end of the eligibility period the need to finalize the projects by the closure deadline may result in allocation of funds to projects based on their capacity to spend quickly rather than on their ability to provide results. 
Nr det gller projekt som godknts mot slutet av stdperioden kan behovet av att slutfra projekten fre tidsfristen fr avslutandet dock leda till att projekt tilldelas medel utifrn kapaciteten att utnyttja dem snabbt och inte frmgan att leverera resultat.
Moreover the closer the actual expenditure is to the eligibility deadline the less the time available for Audit Authorities to verify its eligibility (see paragraphs 74 to 78). 
Ju nrmare de faktiska utgifterna r tidsfristen fr stdberttigande, desto mindre tid har revisionsmyndigheterna till sitt frfogande att kontrollera att de r stdberttigande (se punkterna 74Đ78).
The TFBI had monitored the Member StatesŐ progress on the agreed measures to improve absorption. 
Arbetsgruppen fr bttre genomfrande hade vervakat medlemsstaternas framsteg med de beslutade tgrderna fr att frbttra utnyttjandet.
However, the manner in which the Member States reported on the results made it difficult to have an overview of all the measures that were used and the impact of each measure. 
Men det stt som medlemsstaterna rapporterade resultaten p gjorde att det var svrt att f en verblick ver alla tgrder som hade vidtagits och varje tgrds effekt.
For some of the measures (e.g. retrospective co-financed projects, use of contractual advances) the legislative framework does not require Member States to report to the Commission. 
Enligt den rttsliga ramen mste inte medlemsstaterna rapportera till kommissionen om vissa tgrder (t.ex. retroaktiva projekt och anvndning av kontraktsenliga frskott).
These two factors hampered its ability to get a comprehensive overview of the measures used and their individual financial impact (see paragraph 37, 67 and 78). 
Dessa tv faktorer gjorde att den inte fick en fullstndig verblick ver de vidtagna tgrderna och deras enskilda finansiella effekt (se punkterna 37, 67 och 78).
89. Although the pressure to spend money towards the end of the 2007-2013 period resulted in some errors, the estimated error rate for Cohesion was consistently lower from 2011 to 2016, compared to 2007 and 2008. 
89. ven om pressen att anvnda medel mot slutet av perioden 2007Đ2013 resulterade i vissa fel, var den uppskattade felprocenten fr sammanhllning konstant lgre frn 2011 till 2016 n 2007 och 2008.
This may be due to the net effect of multiple factors (see paragraphs 80 to 81). 
Det kan bero p nettoeffekten av mnga olika faktorer (se punkterna 80Đ81).
For the 2014-2020 programme period implementation of the OPs started more slowly compared to the previous programme period. This, together with the fact that implementation difficulties were also encountered in the 2007-2013 period it is likely that 
Detta tillsammans med det faktum att det ocks frekom problem med genomfrandet under perioden 2007Đ 2013 gr att medlemsstaterna sannolikt kommer att stta p utnyttjandeproblem ocks under den innevarande perioden (se punkterna 23Đ26).
47 Recommendation 1 Đ a timetable for legislative framework and programme documents The Commission should prepare a timetable which includes key milestone dates (e.g. the proposal and adoption of the legislative framework) with a view to ensure that OP implementation starts on time, at the beginning of the programme period. 
48 Rekommendation 1 Đ En tidtabell fr den rttsliga ramen och programdokumenten Kommissionen br faststlla en tidtabell med vissa milstolpsdatum (t.ex. frslaget till och antagandet av den rttsliga ramen) fr att skerstlla att genomfrandet av de operativa programmen startar i tid, i brjan av programperioden.
The Commission should propose such a timetable to the Council and the European Parliament with a view to reaching an agreement on it. 
Kommissionen br fresl en sdan tidtabell fr rdet och Europaparlamentet s att en verenskommelse kan ns om den.
Target implementation date: Immediately (for the post-2020 legislative framework). 
Mldatum fr genomfrande: Omedelbart (fr den rttsliga ramen efter 2020).
Recommendation 2 Đ well supported requests for revision of programmes (including impacts on results) The Commission should ensure, prior to the adoption of its decisions revising operational programmes where key elements of performance are affected, that: (a) the request is based on a sound and comprehensive underlying assessment of the implementation of the OP and partnership agreement and the related needs at the time of revision; and (b) the revision is primarily undertaken to provide better results and that changes in the level of funding for priorities are reflected in performance indicators. Target implementation date: Applicable to future OP revision requests by Member States. 
Rekommendation 2 Đ En begran om versyn av program ska vara vl underbyggd (och inbegripa effekter p resultat) Kommissionen br innan den fattar beslut om versyn av operativa program och i de fall d viktiga resultatfaktorer pverkas skerstlla att a) begran bygger p en tillfrlitlig och grundlig bedmning av genomfrandet av det operativa programmet och partnerskapsverenskommelsen och de tillhrande behoven vid tidpunkten fr versynen, b) versynen i frsta hand grs fr att leverera bttre resultat och att ndringar av storleken p finansieringen till prioriteringar terspeglas i resultatindikatorerna.
48 Recommendation 3 Đ means to obtain information allowing better monitoring of absorption The Commission should ensure that it has the means to: (a) obtain the information necessary to undertake a thorough and comprehensive monitoring of absorption by OP; (b) identify the causes for both slow and rapid absorption, bearing in mind that expenditure should be legal and regular and the importance of funds being spent effectively; and (c) assess ex ante the need and the impact of measures to increase absorption in order to decide whether or not to use them. 
49 Rekommendation 3 Đ Metoder att inhmta information som gr att utnyttjandet kan vervakas bttre Kommissionen br skerstlla att den kan a) inhmta den information som krvs fr en noggrann och omfattande vervakning av utnyttjandet inom varje operativt program, b) identifiera orsakerna till bde lngsamt och snabbt genomfrande, med beaktande av att utgifterna ska vara lagliga och korrekta samt vikten av att medlen anvnds ndamlsenligt, c) p frhand mta behovet och effekten av tgrder fr att ka utnyttjandet i syfte att besluta om de ska vidtas eller inte.
Target implementation date: By end 2018 for (a) and (b). 
Mldatum fr genomfrande: Fre utgngen av 2018 nr det gller a) och b).
By end of 2020 for (c). 
Fre utgngen av 2020 nr det gller c).
Recommendation 4 Đ focus on performance and delivery of good results The Commission should ensure that, when it provides Member States and OPs with targeted support to accelerate implementation of the 2014-2020 programme period (such as when revising OPs), actions are undertaken with a focus on delivering good results. 
Rekommendation 4 Đ Fokus p effektivitet och leverans av goda resultat Kommissionen br skerstlla att tgrder med fokus p goda resultat vidtas nr den ger medlemsstaterna och operativa program riktat std fr att pskynda genomfrandet av programperioden 2014Đ2020 (t.ex. nr operativa program ses ver).
Target implementation date: Immediately. 
Mldatum fr genomfrande: Omedelbart.
This Report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Ms Iliana IVANOVA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 30 May 2018. 
Denna rapport antogs av revisionsrttens avdelning II, med ledamoten Iliana Ivanova som ordfrande, vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 30 maj 2018.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President List of Operational Programmes selected for review Annex 1 Member State Operational Programme Fund Covered by the TFBI Bulgaria Environment (2007BG161PO005) CF&ERDF x Czech Republic1 Environment (2007CZ161PO006)2 CF&ERDF x Central Bohemia (2007CZ161PO009) ERDF Enterprises and Innovations (2007CZ161PO004) ERDF Human Resource and Employment (2007CZ05UPO001)2 ESF Hungary1 Environment and Energy (2007HU161PO002)2 CF&ERDF x North Hungary (2007HU161PO006) ERDF Transport (2007HU161PO007)2 CF&ERDF x Italy1 Calabria (2007IT161PO008) ERDF x Security for development (2007IT161PO007)2 ERDF Sicily (2007IT161PO011)2 ERDF x Calabria FSE (2007IT051PO002) ESF Romania1 Sectorial Development of Human Resources (2007RO051PO001)2 ESF x Increase in Economic Competitiveness (2007RO161PO002)2 ERDF x Environment (2007RO161PO004)2 CF&ERDF x Slovakia Competitiveness and Economic growth (2007SK161PO006) ERDF x Transport (2007SK161PO004) CF&ERDF Education (2007SK05UPO001) ESF x Spain Research, Development and Innovation (R&D&I) for and by Enterprises Đ Technology Fund (2007ES16UPO001) ERDF Knowledge-based economy (2007ES16UPO003) ERDF 1 Member States visited on-the-spot. 
Frteckning ver operativa program som valdes ut fr granskning Bilaga 1 Behandlades av arbetsgruppen fr bttre genomfrande Medlemsstat Operativt program Fond Bulgarien Tjeckien1 Milj (2007BG161PO005) SF & Eruf x Milj (2007CZ161PO006)2 SF & Eruf x Mellersta Bhmen (2007CZ161PO009) Fretag och innovationer (2007CZ161PO004) Eruf Eruf Mnskliga resurser och sysselsttning (2007CZ05UPO001)2 Milj och energi (2007HU161PO002)2 ESF Ungern1 SF & Eruf x Norra Ungern (2007HU161PO006) Eruf Italien1 Transport (2007HU161PO007)2 Kalabrien (2007IT161PO008) SF & Eruf x Sicilien (2007IT161PO011)2 Eruf x Skerhet fr utveckling (2007IT161PO007) Eruf Eruf x Kalabrien ESF (2007IT051PO002) Rumnien1 kad ekonomisk konkurrenskraft (2007RO161PO002)2 ESF Sektorsspecifik utveckling av mnskliga resurser (2007RO051PO001)2 ESF x Eruf x Milj (2007RO161PO004)2 Konkurrenskraft och ekonomisk tillvxt (2007SK161PO006) SF & Eruf x Slovakien Eruf x Transport (2007SK161PO004)2 SF & Eruf Utbildning (2007SK05UPO001) Spanien Forskning, utveckling och innovation (FoU och innovation) fr och av fretag Đ teknikfonden (2007ES16UPO001) ESF Eruf x Kunskapsbaserad ekonomi (2007ES16UPO003) Eruf 1 Medlemsstater som besktes p plats.
2 OPs reviewed in-depth. REPLIES OF THE COMMISSION TO THE SPECIAL REPORT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS ŇCOMMISSION'S AND MEMBER STATES' ACTIONS FOR THE 2007-2013 PROGRAMMES TACKLED LOW ABSORPTION BUT HAD INSUFFICIENT FOCUS ON RESULTS" EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The Commission monitors implementation at Member State and programme and where necessary at project level as well. 
2 Operativa program som djupgranskats. KOMMISSIONENS SVAR P EUROPEISKA REVISIONSRTTENS SRSKILDA RAPPORT ÓKOMMISSIONENS OCH MEDLEMSSTATERNAS TGRDER UNDER PROGRAMPERIODEN 2007Đ2013 RDDE BOT P DET LGA ANSLAGSUTNYTTJANDET MEN VAR INTE INRIKTADE P RESULTATÓ SAMMANFATTNING I. Kommissionen vervakar genomfrandet p medlemsstatsniv och programniv, och vid behov ven p projektniv.
As part of implementation, the Commission also follows closely the financial implementation, paying particular attention to EU payments to programmes. 
Som ett led i genomfrandet fljer kommissionen ocks nra det finansiella genomfrandet, med srskild uppmrksamhet p EU:s betalningar till programmen.
The data transmission arrangements for 2014-2020 enable the Commission to have a reliable and up-to-date picture on the overall implementation including the outputs and results the programmes deliver. 
Uppgiftsverfringen fr 2014Đ2020 gr att kommissionen har en tillfrlitlig och aktuell bild av det allmnna genomfrandet, inbegripet de utfall och resultat som programmen ger.
The adoption date of the legislative framework strongly depends on the co-legislators; for the 2021-2027 period, the Commission presented its proposal 30 months before the planned start of the eligibility period. 
Antagandedatumet fr den rttsliga ramen r starkt beroende av medlagstiftarna: fr perioden 2021Đ2027 har kommissionen lagt fram sitt frslag 30 mnader fre den planerade starten fr stdberttigandeperioden.
The Commission underlines that while early adoption is important in relation to starting programme implementation, there are also other factors in terms of performance and absorption over the period Đ the n+2/3 regime, the level of pre-financing or requirements in terms of designation have a higher effect. 
Kommissionen understryker att det visserligen r viktigt med ett tidigt antagande s att programmen kan brja genomfras, men det finns ven andra faktorer i frga om resultat och anslagsutnyttjande under perioden: n+2/3-regeln, graden av frfinansiering eller kraven fr att utse myndigheter har en strre effekt.
Programmes approved relatively late compared to the average can still easily catch up depending on the circumstances and achieve better than average absorption levels by the end of the period. 
Program som godknns frhllandevis sent jmfrt med genomsnittet kan nd komma ikapp beroende p omstndigheterna och prestera bttre n de genomsnittliga utnyttjandegraderna i slutet av perioden.
The n+2 rule enforces a stronger budgetary discipline and incentivises faster budgetary implementation. 
N+2-regeln skapar en starkare budgetdisciplin och stimulerar ett snabbare budgetgenomfrande.
A list of ready-to-implement projects is also an important success for programme performance and absorption. 
En frteckning ver projekt som r klara att genomfras r ocks en stor framgng fr programmens resultat och anslagsutnyttjandet.
V. The Commission is satisfied with the results of the initiative "Task Force for Better Implementation". 
V. Kommissionen r njd med resultaten av initiativet Óarbetsgruppen fr bttre genomfrandeÓ.
The funds at risk at the end of 2014 stood in the range of EUR 10-13 billion and the decommitment amount was brought below EUR 5 billion by closure. 
De belopp som riskerade att tertas i slutet av 2014 uppgick till omkring 10Đ13 miljarder euro, och det belopp som slutligen tertogs hade minskat till under 5 miljarder euro vid avslut.
The Commission assists Member States in spending the available funds which led to an absorption level of 97% for the 2007-2013 Đ which is 2 pp above the levels for 2000-2006. 
Kommissionen hjlper medlemsstaterna med att utnyttja tillgngliga medel, vilket ledde till en utnyttjandegrad p 97 % fr 2007Đ2013 Đ det r tv procentenheter hgre n 2000Đ2006.
The Commission proposed measures to Member States being at risk of absorption which were in line with the 2007-2013 legal framework and were adapted to the circumstances of the Member States and the particular programmes. 
Kommissionen freslog tgrder fr medlemsstater som riskerade att inte utnyttja sina medel. tgrderna var frenliga med den rttsliga ramen fr 2007Đ2013 och anpassades till medlemsstaternas och de specifika programmens omstndigheter.
They were also in line with the programme objectives, including its indicators, intervention logic and the selection procedures applied by the programme, etc. Therefore there appeared to be no need for any exceptional consideration for results only for safeguards that the proposed results are indeed delivered. 
De var ocks frenliga med programmlen, inklusive indikatorer, interventionslogik och de urvalsfrfaranden som programmet anvnt osv. Det frefll drfr inte finnas ngot behov av srskilda vervganden i frga om resultat, utan endast fr garantier fr att de freslagna resultaten ocks uppnddes.
It is standard programme management practice that when a programme shows indication of a lower absorption rate, the actions taken to address these issues focus on absorption within the existing targets. 
Det r standardpraxis fr programfrvaltning att nr ett program visar en lgre utnyttjandegrad inriktas de tgrder som vidtas fr att lsa dessa problem p anslagsutnyttjandet inom ramen fr de befintliga mlen.
The Commission also considers flexibility being an important feature of cohesion policy. 
Kommissionen anser ven att flexibilitet r ett viktigt inslag i sammanhllningspolitiken.
Programme amendments are crucial to reflect the changing circumstances, emerging challenges, new or adjusted priorities for programmes covering a decade-long period. 
Programndringar r avgrande fr att avspegla frnderliga frhllanden, framvxande utmaningar och nya eller anpassade prioriteringar fr program som lper ver ett helt rtionde.
The Commission has a detailed overview of the programmes and measures applied in those as part of regular programme management throughout the period. 
Som ett led i den regelbundna programfrvaltningen under perioden har kommissionen en detaljerad verblick av programmen och de tgrder som vidtas inom dessa.
When necessary, the Commission gathers information related to issues important for programme management where these are not part of the regular reporting. 
Vid behov samlar kommissionen in information om frgor som r viktiga fr programfrvaltningen och inte ingr i den regelbundna rapporteringen.
Second indent: The Commission accepts this recommendation. 1 
Andra strecksatsen: Kommissionen godtar rekommendationen. 1
Third indent: The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Tredje strecksatsen: Kommissionen godtar rekommendationen.
Fourth indent: The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Fjrde strecksatsen: Kommissionen godtar rekommendationen.
AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH Box 1 - Absorption is a means to achieve results and not an end in itself The Commission has already replied to this finding in the ECA Annual report in 2013 and stated that: "the Commission notes that the performance criteria are built into the process of selecting each project to be funded. 
REVISIONENS INRIKTNING OCH OMFATTNING SAMT REVISIONSMETOD Ruta 1 Đ Utnyttjande r ett verktyg fr att uppn resultat och inte ett sjlvndaml Kommissionen har redan besvarat denna slutsats i samband med revisionsrttens rsrapport 2013, och frklarade d fljande: ÓKommissionen noterar att resultatkriterierna ingr i frfarandet fr val av varje projekt som ska finansieras.
Through the application of weighted selection criteria Member States should be able to identify the projects that could best contribute to the achievement of results." For the 2014-2020 period the legal framework increased focus on performance with the introduction of thematic concentration requirements, the performance framework and reserve and ex-ante conditionalities. 
Genom tillmpningen av viktade urvalskriterier br medlemsstaterna kunna faststlla vilka projekt som p bsta stt skulle kunna bidra till att uppn resultaten.Ó Fr perioden 2014Đ2020 strktes den rttsliga ramens resultatinriktning i och med infrandet av de tematiska koncentrationskraven, resultatramen och reserven samt frhandsvillkoren.
The political agreement on the Commission's Omnibus proposal further enhanced the possibilities to pay based on predefined results, conditions being met or results being delivered1. 
Den politiska verenskommelsen om kommissionens paketfrslag innebar att mjligheterna att betala baserat p frhandsfaststllda krav kades, om villkoren uppfylldes eller resultaten levererades1.
The Commission points out also that in parallel to the negotiation of the legal framework, it starts informal programme negotiations in order to make progress by the time the legal framework is adopted. 
Kommissionen ppekar ocks att den parallellt med frhandlingarna om den rttsliga ramen inleder informella programfrhandlingar, s att framsteg har gjorts vid den tidpunkt d den rttsliga ramen antas.
In 2014-2020, this process was based on Position Papers established per Member State. 
Under programperioden 2014Đ2020 baseras denna process p principfrklaringar som faststlls av varje medlemsstat.
The Commission underlines that the adoption date of the legislative framework is mostly determined by the co-legislators. 
Kommissionen understryker att antagandedatumet fr den rttsliga ramen frmst avgrs av medlagstiftarna.
For the 2021-2027 period the Commission presented its proposal 30 months before the planned start of the eligibility period. 
Fr perioden 2021Đ2027 har kommissionen lagt fram sitt frslag 30 mnader fre den planerade starten fr stdberttigandeperioden.
Nevertheless, the Commission is not in a position to control the pace of adoption of the legislative proposals by the co-legislators. 
Kommissionen kan dock inte kontrollera hur snabbt medlagstiftarna antar lagstiftningsfrslagen.
The Commission underlines that while early adoption is important in relation to programme implementation, there are other important factors in terms of absorption over the period. 
Kommissionen understryker att ett tidigt antagande visserligen r viktigt fr programgenomfrandet, men det finns andra viktiga utnyttjanderelaterade frgor under perioden.
Programmes adopted relatively late compared to the average can achieve better than average absorption levels by the end of the period. 
Program som antagits frhllandevis sent jmfrt med genomsnittet kan ge bttre resultat n de genomsnittliga utnyttjandegraderna i slutet av perioden.
Whether programmes are subject to a n+2 or a n+3 rule is a more decisive factor in terms of the absorption level achieved by the end of the programming period. 
Huruvida programmen omfattas av n+2-regeln eller n+3-regeln r en mer avgrande faktor nr det gller den utnyttjandegrad som ntts i slutet av programperioden.
Box 2 Đ 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 OPs adopted after the programme periods had started The Commission notes that its performance on the negotiations and adoption of programmes in comparison with the previous programming period can also be assessed by comparing the first 12 months following the adoption of the legal framework. 
Ruta 2 Đ Operativa program 2007Đ2013 och 2014Đ2020 som godkndes efter det att programperioderna hade brjat Kommissionen konstaterar att dess resultat i frhandlingarna och antagandet av programmen jmfrt med fregende programperiod ven kan bedmas genom att man jmfr de frsta tolv mnaderna efter antagandet av den rttsliga ramen.
Using the period of 12 months from the adoption of the relevant legislative packages in both periods would offer a more accurate picture. 
Tolvmnadersperioden frn antagandet av de relevanta lagstiftningspaketen fr bda perioderna skulle ge en mer korrekt bild.
This would mean that in 2014-2020, in the first 12 months after the adoption of the regulation 40 % of OPs were adopted, in comparison to 6% of OPs in the same timeframe of the 2007-13 programming period. 
Fr programperioden 2014Đ2020 skulle detta innebra att 40 % av de operativa programmen antogs under de frsta tolv mnaderna efter antagandet av frordningen, jmfrt med 6 % av de operativa programmen inom samma tidsram under programperioden 2007Đ2013.
1 COM (2016) 605 of 14.9.2016, Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union. 2 
1 Frslag till Europaparlamentets och rdets frordning om finansiella regler fr unionens allmnna budget (COM(2016) 605, 14.9.2016). 2
The Commission considers that absorption (defined in terms of EU payments) is slower given that the overall pre-financing amounts in 2014-2020 are significantly higher than in 2007-2013. 
Kommissionen anser att anslagsutnyttjandet (rknat som EU-betalningar) r lgre p grund av att de totala frfinansieringsbeloppen under 2014Đ2020 r betydligt hgre n under 2007Đ2013.