natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the case of projects that the Commission manages indirectly, the contracts generally include in their global budget a percentage to cover overheads, set at a maximum of 7 %. 
Vad betrffar projekt som kommissionen frvaltar indirekt brukar kontrakten i den globala budgeten innehlla en procentandel fr omkostnader p hgst 7 %.
We found five cases29 out of six examined where overheads were declared for the different implementation layers; first for the entrusted entity and second for the sub-grantee NGOs30. Projects 11, 12 and 15. 
Vi fann att omkostnader hade deklarerats fr de olika genomfrandeniverna i fem29 av de sex fall som 25 26 27 28 29 Projekt 11, 12 och 15.
Projects 8, 9, 10, 18 and 19. 
Projekt 8, 9, 10, 18 och 19.
The UN body provided satisfactory replies to the third request from DG ECHO after the auditors’ on-the-spot visit. 
FN-organet lmnade tillfredsstllande svar p den tredje begran frn GD Echo efter revisorernas besk p plats.
Projects 8, 9, 18, 19 and 20. 
Projekt 8, 9, 18, 19 och 20.
24 Box 6 – Example of overcharging indirect costs In project 20, the UN body sub-granted some activities to two NGOs. 
Ruta 6 Đ Exempel p fr hgt redovisade indirekta kostnader I projekt 20 delegerade FN-organet ngra verksamheter till tv icke-statliga organisationer som fick bidrag i flera led.
The budget in the agreements signed included in both cases a flat-rate of 7 % overheads. 
Budgeten fr de undertecknade verenskommelserna innehll i bda fallen en schablonsats p 7 % fr omkostnader.
These overheads were further included in the total amount of direct costs declared by the UN body to the Commission and used as a basis for the calculation of the 7 % overheads it requested. 
Omkostnaderna ingick dessutom i det totala beloppet fr direkta kostnader som FN-organet deklarerade till kommissionen och lg till grund fr berkningen av de omkostnader p 7 % som organet begrde.
Because of the lack of adequate information on costs declared by sub-grantee NGOs, the Commission was not always in position to check the costs declared by all NGOs funded. 
Eftersom det saknades lmplig information om de kostnader som deklarerats av icke-statliga organisationer som ftt bidrag i flera led kunde kommissionen inte alltid kontrollera de kostnader som deklarerats av alla icke-statliga organisationer som ftt finansiering.
This hindered the Commission in detecting potential cases of overcharging. 
Detta hindrade kommissionen frn att upptcka potentiella fall av fr hgt redovisade kostnader.
Information on EU funds implemented by NGOs is published in several systems but the information disclosed is limited 50. 
Information om EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer offentliggrs i flera system, men den redovisade informationen r begrnsad 50.
We assessed whether the Commission had disclosed comprehensive and timely information on funds contracted with NGOs for the policy areas we audited. 
Vi bedmde om kommissionen i lmplig tid hade offentliggjort heltckande information om medel som varit freml fr kontrakt med icke-statliga organisationer fr de politikomrden som vi granskade.
In the area of external action, we examined whether the Commission complied with international aid transparency standards when publishing information on EU funds implemented by NGOs. 
P omrdet yttre tgrder underskte vi om kommissionen fljde internationella normer fr ppenhet i bistndet nr den offentliggjorde information om EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer.
In addition, for the projects we audited we checked the consistency of the data published in different transparency-portals. 
30 projekten kontrollerade vi dessutom om de uppgifter som offentliggjorts p olika ppenhetsportaler var konsekventa.
Information on contracts with NGOs is published in the Financial Transparency System but is incomplete 51. 
Information om kontrakt med icke-statliga organisationer offentliggrs i systemet fr finansiell transparens, men den r ofullstndig 51.
Every year the Commission publishes data about the beneficiaries of EU funding under direct management in all policy areas in its Financial Transparency System (FTS)31 (see Box 7). 
Varje r offentliggr kommissionen uppgifter om mottagarna av EU-finansiering med direkt frvaltning inom alla politikomrden i sitt system fr finansiell transparens31 (se ruta 7).
In publishing ex post information on recipients of EU funds in the FTS, the Commission complies with the requirements of the Financial Regulation32. 
Genom att i efterhand offentliggra information om mottagare av EU-medel i systemet fr finansiell transparens uppfyller kommissionen budgetfrordningens krav32.
25 Box 7 – Information available in the Commission’ Financial Transparency System The Commission published the following data in the FTS: • Beneficiary/-ies receiving the funds; • Purpose of the expenditure; • Location of the beneficiary; • Amount and type of expenditure (commitments only); • Responsible service awarding the funding; • Part of the EU budget providing the funding; • Year in which the amount was booked in the Commission accounts. Source: https://ec.europa.eu/info/about-european-commission/service-standards-and-principles/transparency/funding-recipients_en 52. However, the FTS does not provide comprehensive information on NGO funding because: - 31 32 no information is disclosed on actual payments; Financial Transparency System: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/fts/index_en.htm. 
27 Ruta 7 Đ Information i kommissionens system fr finansiell transparens Kommissionen offentliggjorde fljande uppgifter i systemet fr finansiell transparens: Ľ Namn p den/de stdmottagare som fr medlen Ľ Syftet med utgiften Ľ Var stdmottagaren r lokaliserad Ľ Belopp och typ av utgift (endast taganden) Ľ Ansvarig avdelning som tilldelar finansieringen Ľ Del av EU-budgeten som tillhandahller finansieringen Ľ r d beloppet bokfrdes i kommissionens rkenskaper Klla: https://ec.europa.eu/info/about-european-commission/service-standards-and-principles/transparency/funding-recipients_sv 31 32 Systemet fr finansiell transparens: http://ec.europa.eu/budget/fts/index_en.htm.
Article 35 of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union and Article 21 on its rules of application: “Publication of information on recipients and other information”. 
Artikel 35 i budgetfrordningen fr unionens allmnna budget och artikel 21 i dess tillmpningsfreskrifter: ÓOffentliggrande av information om mottagare samt annan informationÓ 52.
- the beneficiary category “NGO” was only introduced in 2016 and is not used consistently due to the absence of criteria to identify NGOs; and - entities receiving funding through sub-granting are not disclosed. 
Systemet fr finansiell transparens innehller dock inte heltckande information om finansiering till icke-statliga organisationer eftersom - ingen information om gjorda betalningar offentliggrs, - mottagarkategorin Óicke-statlig organisationÓ infrdes inte frrn 2016 och anvnds inte konsekvent eftersom det saknas kriterier fr identifiering av icke-statliga organisationer, - enheter som fr finansiering genom bidrag i flera led redovisas inte.
Commission departments apply different approaches when disclosing funding in the FTS. 
Kommissionens avdelningar tillmpar olika metoder nr de redovisar finansiering i systemet fr finansiell transparens.
When entering into contracts with multiple beneficiaries, DG RTD, DG ENV and DG EAC (via EACEA) publish the names of all beneficiaries and include a breakdown of funds. 
Nr GD Forskning och innovation, GD Milj och GD Utbildning, ungdom, idrott och kultur (via Eacea) ingr kontrakt med flera stdmottagare offentliggr de namnen p samtliga stdmottagare och bifogar en frdelning av medlen.
DG ECHO publishes the financial amount and the name of the NGO with which the Commission has signed the grant agreement; it does not disclose information on any other implementing partners carrying out part or all of the action (see Figure 3). 
GD Echo offentliggr bidragsbeloppet och namnet p den icke-statliga organisation som kommissionen har ingtt bidragsverenskommelsen med men ingen information om eventuella andra genomfrandepartner som utfr delar av eller hela tgrden (se figur 3).
DG NEAR and DG DEVCO state the names of the NGOs with which the Commission has signed a grant agreement and the co-applicants. 
GD Grannskapspolitik och utvidgningsfrhandlingar och GD Internationellt samarbete och utveckling uppger namnen p de icke-statliga organisationer som kommissionen har ingtt en bidragsverenskommelse med och namnen p de medskande.
However, the amount of the grant is entirely linked to the leading partner with no breakdown per beneficiary. 
Bidragsbeloppet r dock helt kopplat till den ledande partnern och delas inte upp per stdmottagare.
We found that for all of the 14 projects reviewed under direct management, the amounts published in the FTS were consistent with those committed in the grant agreements. 
Vi konstaterade fr samtliga 14 granskade projekt med direkt frvaltning att de belopp som hade offentliggjorts i systemet fr finansiell transparens verensstmde med tagandena i bidragsverenskommelserna.
However, in five cases33, some data published concerning the action type or the geographical location or the service responsible was missing or incorrect. 
Men i fem fall33 saknades ngra uppgifter om typ av tgrd, geografisk lokalisering eller ansvarig avdelning, eller s var uppgifterna felaktiga.
Additional information, including on results, is disclosed on different transparency portals 55. 
29 Ytterligare information, bland annat om resultat, offentliggrs p olika ppenhetsportaler 55.
In addition to the FTS, the Commission publishes information on actions funded on various platforms for the different policy areas. 
Frutom i systemet fr finansiell transparens offentliggr kommissionen information om finansierade tgrder p flera plattformar fr de olika politikomrdena.
For instance, in the area of research the Commission discloses information on its funding via CORDIS, a public repository and portal on EU-funded research projects and their results34. 
P forskningsomrdet till exempel offentliggr kommissionen information om sin finansiering via CORDIS, ett arkiv och en portal som r offentliga och handlar om EU-finansierade forskningsprojekt och deras resultat34.
In the external action area, the Commission discloses information on NGO funding via several aid transparency web portals: EU Aid Explorer35, the European Emergency Disaster Projects 1, 2, 5, 14 and 15. 
P omrdet yttre tgrder offentliggr kommissionen information om finansiering till icke-statliga organisationer via flera webbportaler fr ppenhet i bistndet: EU Aid Explorer35, det europeiska informationssystemet fr nd-och katastrofinsatser (Edris)36 och den ekonomiska sprningstjnsten37.
Overall, the information published on the projects audited was consistent with the funding actually provided. 
Allmnt sett verensstmde den offentliggjorda informationen om de granskade projekten med den finansiering som betalats ut.
Information on humanitarian and development aid is generally disclosed in accordance with international transparency standards 57. 
Information om humanitrt bistnd och utvecklingsbistnd offentliggrs i allmnhet i enlighet med internationella ppenhetsnormer 57.
The Commission reports data on humanitarian and development aid in order to fulfil international aid transparency commitments. 
Kommissionen rapporterar uppgifter om humanitrt bistnd och utvecklingsbistnd fr att uppfylla taganden om ppenhet vid internationellt bistnd.
It reports to the OECD Creditor Reporting System38, the OECD Forward Spending Survey39 and the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) Registry40 in accordance with international common standards. 
Den rapporterar till OECD:s rapporteringssystem fr kreditgivare38, OECD:s underskning av framtida utgiftsplaner39 och det internationella initiativet fr ppenhets (Iati) register40 i enlighet med internationella, gemensamma normer.
The Commission published data on humanitarian and development aid according to the IATI common standard, but some of the data showed weaknesses 58. 
Kommissionen offentliggjorde uppgifter om humanitrt bistnd och utvecklingsbistnd i enlighet med Iatis gemensamma norm, men ngra av uppgifterna hade brister 58.
The Commission discloses data on humanitarian and development aid following a common standard reporting framework developed under IATI41, which is a global initiative seeking to increase the transparency and effectiveness of development cooperation. 
Kommissionen offentliggr uppgifter om humanitrt bistnd och utvecklingsbistnd i enlighet med en gemensam ram fr standardrapportering som utarbetats inom Iati41, som r ett globalt initiativ fr att frska frbttra ppenheten och ndamlsenligheten vid utvecklingssamarbete.
Overall, the Commission publishes data according to the IATI standard. 
Generellt offentliggr kommissionen uppgifter i enlighet med Iati-normen.
For the projects sampled, we compared the information published on the IATI user-friendly web portal with the actual data. 
Vi jmfrde den information om projekten i urvalet som offentliggjorts p Iatis anvndarvnliga webbportal med de faktiska uppgifterna.
Information was published for all audited projects, but we found several errors in the contracted amounts43, the disbursements44 and the project end dates45 (see Box 8). 
Information offentliggjordes om alla granskade projekt, men vi hittade flera fel i de kontrakterade beloppen43, utbetalningarna44 och projektens slutdatum45 (se ruta 8).
The UN bodies published inadequate information on the contracts awarded to NGOs 61. 
FN-organen offentliggjorde otillrcklig information om de kontrakt som tilldelats icke-statliga organisationer 61.
The Commission entrusts the implementation of projects under indirect management to a third party. 
Kommissionen anfrtror genomfrandet av projekt med indirekt frvaltning till en tredje part.
In these cases, it is the responsibility of the entrusted entity to disclose the grants awarded with EU funding46. 
I de hr fallen ansvarar den enhet som anfrtrotts frvaltningsuppgifter fr att offentliggra de bidrag som tilldelats med EU-medel46.
We verified the data that the entrusted UN bodies had published on the six indirect management projects of the sample (see Annex II). 
Vi kontrollerade de uppgifter som de FN-organ som anfrtrotts frvaltningsuppgifter hade offentliggjort om de sex projekten med indirekt frvaltning i urvalet (se bilaga II).
We found that in five cases, the UN Projects 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 16 and 17. 
I fem fall konstaterade vi att FN-organen antingen inte offentliggjorde47, eller endast delvis offentliggjorde48, information om de bidrag som hade tilldelats icke-statliga organisationer med EU-medel (se ruta 9).
Projects 7, 14 and 15. According to the general conditions governing agreements signed between the Commission and entrusted entities, the latter are obliged to publish, on their website or in their systems, detailed information on the grants financed by the EU. 
P sin webbplats offentliggjorde FN-organet endast begrnsad information 46 47 48 Enligt de allmnna villkoren fr verenskommelser som ings mellan kommissionen och de enheter som anfrtros frvaltningsuppgifter r de senare skyldiga att offentliggra detaljerad information om de bidrag som finansieras av EU p sin webbplats eller i sina system.
They are required to disclose the title of the contract/project, its nature and purpose, the name and locality of the grant beneficiary and the contracted amount. 
De ska offentliggra namnet p kontraktet/projektet, dess typ och syfte, namn och lokalisering p stdmottagaren och kontraktsbeloppet.
This included whether the Commission’s identification of entities as NGOs was reliable and whether the selection of NGOs implementing EU-funded actions was transparent. 
Vi tittade drfr p om kommissionens identifiering av enheter som icke-statliga organisationer var tillfrlitlig och om valet av icke-statliga organisationer som genomfr EU-finansierade tgrder var transparent.
We also examined the process of collecting, checking and disclosing information on NGOs appropriately. 
Vi underskte ocks om processen fr insamling, kontroll och redovisning av information om icke-statliga organisationer var lmplig.
We covered the main policy areas in which NGOs implement EU funds, focusing in particular on the largest funding area, external action. 
Granskningen omfattade de viktigaste politikomrdena dr icke-statliga organisationer frvaltar EU-medel, och vi inriktade oss i frsta hand p det strsta finansieringsomrdet, yttre tgrder.
In most cases, the eligibility of EU funding does not depend on the NGO status. 
I de flesta fall avgrs inte berttigandet till EU-finansiering av statusen som icke-statlig organisation.
The assignment of the NGO status in the Commission’s accounting system, which is based on self-declaration, and the limited checks the Commission applied , made the classification of an entity as an NGO unreliable (see paragraphs 18 to 27). 
Tilldelningen av status som icke-statlig organisation i kommissionens redovisningssystem, som bygger p en egen frskran, och kommissionens begrnsade kontroller gjorde att klassificeringen av en enhet som icke-statlig organisation var otillfrlitlig (se punkterna 18Đ27).
There was no Commission-wide system for registering applicants for funding. 
Det fanns inget system fr hela kommissionen dr skande som ansker om finansiering registreras.
In addition, the different systems used to register applicants for funding, including NGOs, were not interconnected (see paragraph 22). 
Dessutom var de olika systemen som anvnds fr att registrera skande som ansker om finansiering, dribland icke-statliga organisationer, inte sammankopplade (se punkt 22).
In the area of external action, we found the Commission’s selection of NGO-led projects to be generally transparent. 
P omrdet yttre tgrder fann vi att kommissionens val av projekt som leddes av icke-statliga organisationer i allmnhet var transparenta.
However, there were shortcomings in certain cases. (see paragraphs 28 to 33). 
I ngra fall fanns det dock brister (se punkterna 28Đ33).
DG ECHO ́s interpretation of the rules for financial support to third parties was broader than other DGs and allows for several implementation layers with no limitation on the sub-granted amounts (see paragraphs 35 and 37). 
GD Echo gr en bredare tolkning av reglerna fr ekonomiskt std till tredje part n vriga generaldirektorat och tillter flera genomfrandeniver utan ngon grns fr bidragsbeloppen i flera led (se punkterna 35 och 37).
The audited UN bodies’ selection procedures of NGOs were not always transparent (see paragraphs 38 and 39). 
De granskade FN-organens frfaranden fr urval av icke-statliga organisationer var inte alltid transparenta (se punkterna 38Đ39).
The Commission did not always collect and check the information on NGOs appropriately. 
Kommissionen samlade inte alltid in och kontrollerade informationen om icke-statliga organisationer p lmpligt stt.
In particular, these systems did not always allow the recording of funds received by all contract beneficiaries (see paragraphs 41 to 42). 
Framfr allt var systemen inte alltid upplagda s att det gick att redovisa vilka anslag varje stdmottagare inom ett kontrakt hade erhllit (se punkterna 41Đ42).
In external action, the Commission did not have comprehensive information on the funding received and activities carried out by all the implementing actors. 
P omrdet yttre tgrder hade kommissionen inte heltckande information om de anslag som erhllits och de tgrder som utfrts av varje genomfrare.
This occurred particularly with networks of international NGOs and projects under indirect management. 
Detta intrffade framfr allt nr det handlade om ntverk av internationella icke-statliga organisationer och projekt med indirekt frvaltning.
Furthermore, in indirect management, the lack of information available hindered the Commission’s checks on the costs declared (see paragraphs 43 to 49). 
Vid indirekt frvaltning utgjorde bristen p tillgnglig information dessutom ett hinder fr kommissionens kontroll av de deklarerade kostnaderna (se punkterna 43Đ49).
31 Recommendation 2 – Check the application of rules for sub-granting Where the implementation of an action under direct management requires sub-granting, the Commission should: (a) apply a consistent interpretation of the applicable rules of the Financial Regulation among the different services, taking into account sectorial specificities; in particular, where the implementation of an action requires financial support to a third party, the conditions for such support should be defined in the grant agreement in line with the provisions of the Financial Regulation of 2018. 
34 Rekommendation 2 Đ Kontrollera tillmpningen av regler fr bidrag i flera led Nr genomfrandet av en tgrd med direkt frvaltning krver att bidragen tilldelas i flera led br kommissionen a) tillmpa en konsekvent tolkning av budgetfrordningens regler inom sina olika avdelningar och ta hnsyn till sektorsspecifika frhllanden; srskilt nr genomfrandet av en tgrd krver att ekonomiskt std ges till tredje part br villkoren fr stdet anges i bidragsverenskommelsen i enlighet med budgetfrordningen frn 2018.
When UN bodies select beneficiaries under indirect management, the Commission should: (b) verify that the UN bodies correctly apply their rules and procedures for the selection of implementing partners. 
Nr FN-organ vljer ut stdmottagare vid indirekt frvaltning br kommissionen b) kontrollera att FN-organen korrekt tillmpar sina regler och frfaranden fr valet av genomfrandepartner.
Timeframe: from mid-2019 onwards. 
Tidsram: frn och med mitten av 2019.
Information on EU funds implemented by NGOs is published in several systems but the information disclosed is limited, except in the area of external action (see paragraphs 51 to 56). 
Information om EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer offentliggrs i flera system men den redovisade informationen r begrnsad, utom p omrdet yttre tgrder (se punkterna 51Đ56).
The Commission generally disclosed data on humanitarian and development aid in accordance with international transparency standards, but some of the data showed weaknesses (see paragraphs 58 to 60). 
Kommissionen offentliggjorde i allmnhet uppgifter om humanitrt bistnd och utvecklingsbistnd i enlighet med internationella ppenhetsnormer, men ngra av uppgifterna hade brister (se punkterna 58Đ60).
In five cases, the entrusted UN bodies either did not publish, or only partially published, the contracts awarded to NGOs, and the Commission did not check whether the UN bodies had fulfilled this requirement (see paragraph 62). 
I fem fall offentliggjorde inte de FN-organ som anfrtrotts frvaltningsuppgifter, eller offentliggjorde endast delvis, de kontrakt som tilldelats icke-statliga organisationer, och kommissionen kontrollerade inte om FN-organen hade uppfyllt detta krav (se punkt 62).
33 Recommendation 4 – Standardise and improve accuracy of information published The Commission should: (a) adopt a uniform approach among all the services to publishing in the Financial Transparency System, making sure that all beneficiaries contracted by the EU are disclosed, together with the amount of funding awarded. 
36 Rekommendation 4 Đ Standardisera information som offentliggrs och gr den korrektare Kommissionen br a) infra en enhetlig metod som alla avdelningar ska anvnda nr de offentliggr information i systemet fr finansiell transparens fr att skerstlla att alla stdmottagare som EU har kontrakt med offentliggrs, tillsammans med det tilldelade stdbeloppet.
Timeframe: mid 2021. 
Tidsram: mitten av 2021.