natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
During these visits, it is possible to assess the implementation of the previous recommendations. 
Under dessa besk kan man ven bedma genomfrandet av tidigare rekommendationer.
There has been one unannounced visit and four re-visits concerning SIS II. 
Betrffande SIS II har ett oannonserat besk och fyra terbesk gjorts.
41 The Commission organises a revisit with the specific aim to assess the implementation of the previous recommendations. 
41. Kommissionen anordnar terbesk med det specifika syftet att bedma genomfrandet av tidigare rekommendationer.
Box 2 – Hitting the right target It should be noted that a match in SIS occurs when a search reveals the existence of an alert issued by another Member State (the result of an automated search). 
Ruta 2Đ Trffa rtt ml Det br noteras att en matchning i SIS uppstr nr en skning visar att det finns en registrering i databasen som skapats av en annan medlemsstat (resultat av automatisk skning).
There is always a manual verification, as is required by EU data protection law. 
I enlighet med EU:s dataskyddslagstiftning grs alltid en manuell kontroll.
Only following the manual verification, the match is confirmed and becomes a so-called hit. 
Det r frst efter den manuella kontrollen som matchningen bekrftas och blir en s kallad trff.
58 This issue has been addressed in the new European Border and Coast Guard Regulation which will enter into force later this year and which will repeal the current Eurosur Regulation. 
58. Detta problem har tgrdats i den nya frordningen om den europeiska grns-och kustbevakningen som kommer att trda i kraft senare i r och upphva den nuvarande Eurosurfrordningen.
In particular the EBCG Agency will monitor the data exchanged and will inform all Member States in real time on the status of reporting. 
I synnerhet kommer Europeiska grns-och kustbevakningsbyrn att vervaka de uppgifter som utbyts och informera medlemsstaterna i realtid om status fr rapporteringen.
The reporting on Border Crossing Points will become compulsory. 
Rapporteringen om grnsvergngsstllen kommer att bli obligatorisk.
61 Using VIS to check visa holders at the border is an obligation stemming from Schengen borders code. 
61. Att anvnda VIS fr att kontrollera viseringsinnehavare r ett krav som hrrr frn kodexen om Schengengrnserna.
The Schengen evaluation mechanism could be used to analyse this possible discrepancy to ensure that visas are systematically checked against VIS. 
Utvrderingsmekanismen fr Schengen skulle kunna anvndas fr att analysera denna mjliga diskrepans fr att se till att viseringskontroller systematiskt grs mot VIS.
In addition, it should be noted that the number also includes all alerts that have already been verified by the Member States and for which it is confirmed that they do not represent a data quality issue. 
Dessutom br det framhllas att detta antal ocks inbegriper alla registreringar som redan kontrollerats av medlemsstaterna och fr vilka det bekrftats att de inte utgr ett problem med uppgiftskvaliteten.
These verified alerts are not removed from the detailed report but stay in the report as long as the alert exists. 
De kontrollerade registreringarna tas inte bort frn den detaljerade rapporten utan ligger kvar i rapporten s lnge registreringen finns kvar.
71 The SIS legislation defines the set of data that may be entered in the alert (common Article 20 of the SIS II Decision and SIS II Regulation). 
71. SIS-lagstiftningen definierar vilka uppgifter som fr lggas in i registreringen (gemensam artikel 20 i SIS II-beslutet och SIS II-frordningen).
Data minimisation is an important principle of data protection. 
Uppgiftsminimering r en viktig princip i uppgiftsskyddet.
In addition, the legislation also lays down the minimum set of data, without which no alert can be created. 
Dessutom faststlls i lagstiftningen ocks en minsta uppsttning av uppgifter som krvs fr att en registrering ska kunna gras.
Therefore, any alert containing those minimum data elements is a complete alert. 
Alla registreringar som innehller dessa minimiuppgifter r drfr fullstndiga.
In case such optional data is not entered, the Commission can only assume that the data is not available to the issuing authority. 
Om sdana frivilliga uppgifter inte har lagts till kan kommissionen bara anta att den utfrdande myndigheten inte har tillgng till dem.
72 The obligation to carry out a manual verification is a requirement of EU data protection legislation (General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) and Police Directive on data protection (Directive (EU) 2016/680)). 
72. Kravet p att utfra en manuell kontroll r inskrivet i EU:s dataskyddslagstiftning, nmligen frordning (EU) 2016/679 (den allmnna dataskyddsfrordningen) och direktiv 4
In addition, it is a requirement under the PNR Directive. 
Det r dessutom ett krav enligt PNR-direktivet.
Moreover, the fact that PNR data are based on self-declaration raises issues of reliability. 
Redan det faktum att PNR-uppgifterna grundas p egna deklarationer innebr ocks ett tillfrlitlighetsproblem.
74 The ECA rightly points out that the Commission’s proposal to revise the VIS legal framework (COM (2018) 302), currently being discussed by the co-legislators, provides for the inclusion of national visas and residence permits in VIS. 
Revisionsrtten ppekar med rtta att kommissionens frslag om versyn av den rttsliga ramen fr VIS (COM(2018) 302), som fr nrvarande behandlas av medlagstiftarna, kommer att gra det mjligt att inkludera nationella viseringar och uppehllstillstnd i VIS.
The information gap referred to by the ECA would thus be closed. While it is true that only newly issued long-stay documents would be included, this is an issue that would disappear over time as long-stay documents have a limited validity period and have to be renewed/ replaced. 
Den informationslucka som revisionsrtten nmner kommer drmed att tgrdas. ven om det stmmer att bara nyligen utfrdade handlingar fr lngre vistelser kommer att inkluderas r det ett problem som kommer att frsvinna med tiden, eftersom handlingarna har en begrnsad giltighetstid och mste frnyas eller ersttas.
75 The issue of different formats of the reports submitted by Member States has been addressed in the new European Border and Coast Guard Regulation which is expected to enter into force by the end of 2019 and which will repeal the current Eurosur Regulation. 
Problemet med att medlemsstaterna lmnar in sina rapporter i olika format har tgrdats i den nya frordningen om den europeiska grns-och kustbevakningen som frvntas trda i kraft i slutet av 2019 och som kommer att upphva den nuvarande Eurosurfrordningen.
The reporting in Eurosur will be standardised via an implementing act. 
Rapporteringen i Eurosur kommer att standardiseras genom en genomfrandeakt.
76 See the Commission reply to paragraph 75. 
Se kommissionens svar p punkt 75.
In addition, the Commission will support the development of automated information exchange gateways to limit double data inputs. 
Dessutom kommer kommissionen ge std t utvecklingen av anslutningstjnster fr automatiskt informationsutbyte, fr att begrnsa dubblering av data.
79 The issue of timing for reporting of Member States in the framework of Eurosur has been addressed in the new European Border and Coast Guard Regulation, which is expected to enter into force by the end of 2019 and which will repeal the current Eurosur Regulation. 
79. Problemet med att medlemsstaterna rapporterar med olika tidsintervall har tgrdats i den nya frordningen om den europeiska grns-och kustbevakningen som frvntas trda i kraft i slutet av 2019 och som kommer att upphva den nuvarande Eurosurfrordningen.
The implementing act on Eurosur will address the timing for reporting information in Eurosur as well as the level of responsibility for reporting. 
Genomfrandeakten om Eurosur kommer att ta upp tidsfrister fr rapportering i Eurosur liksom p vilken niv ansvaret fr rapportering ska ligga.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 84 The national components of SIS II and VIS are under Member States responsibility. 
SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 84. De nationella delarna av SIS II och VIS r medlemsstaternas ansvar.
85 Commission, Member States, CEPOL and eu-LISA have ensured regular common training for SIRENE officers in the field of SIS II/SIRENE. 
Kommissionen, medlemsstaterna, Cepol och eu-Lisa har skerstllt regelbunden gemensam utbildning fr Sirene-tjnstemn p omrdet SIS II/Sirene.
A training needs analysis has also been carried out. Member States are increasingly considering investing in integrated/online hands-on training environments. 
Utbildningsbehovet har ocks analyserats. Medlemsstaterna vervger i allt hgre grad att investera i integrerade och webbaserade utbildningsmiljer med praktiska vningar.
The amended legislation establishing the relevant IT systems (e.g. SIS II) will provide for the possibility of the EBCG Agency (Frontex) developing specific interfaces suitable for use by the guest officers deployed in any Member States. 
Den ndrade lagstiftningen som inrttar de relevanta it-systemen (t.ex. SIS II) kommer att skapa mjligheter fr Europeiska grns-och kustbevakningsbyrn att utveckla srskilda grnssnitt som kan anvndas av gstande tjnstemn som r utstationerade i medlemsstaterna.
Recommendation 1 – Promote the use of SIS II and VIS training environments The Commission accepts recommendation 1. 
Rekommendation 1 Đ Frmja anvndningen av utbildningsmiljer fr SIS II och VIS Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 1.
86 Concerning Eurosur, it should be noted that only part of the information being exchanged is compulsory. 
86. Betrffande Eurosur br det noteras att endast en del av den information som utbyts r obligatorisk.
For instance, there is the possibility but no obligation for Member States without external land and sea borders to exchange information concerning air borders. 
Det finns till exempel mjlighet fr medlemsstater utan yttre lands-och havsgrnser att utbyta information om luftgrnser, men de r inte skyldiga att gra det.
However, with the new European Border and Coast Guard Regulation, border checks and air border surveillance have also been included in Eurosur (as an obligation), meaning that in the future almost all Member States will actively provide information in Eurosur. 
I och med den nya frordningen om den europeiska grns-och kustbevakningen har nu ven grnskontroller och kontroller av luftgrnser inkluderats i Eurosur (som ett krav), vilket innebr att nstan alla medlemsstater i framtiden aktivt kommer att bidra med information till Eurosur.
See Commission replies to paragraphs 24-32. 
Se kommissionens svar p punkterna 24Đ32.
Recommendation 2 – Speed up the correction of weaknesses detected during Schengen evaluations The Commission accepts recommendation 2. 
Rekommendation 2 Đ Pskynda korrigeringen av brister som upptcks under Schengenutvrderingarna Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 2.
Recommendation 3 – Analyse discrepancies in visa checks The Commission accepts recommendation 3. 
Rekommendation 3 Đ Analysera skillnaderna i viseringskontroller Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 3.
Recommendation 4 – Improve data quality control procedures The Commission accepts recommendation 4. 
Rekommendation 4 Đ Frbttra frfarandena fr att kontrollera uppgifters kvalitet Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 4.
The Commission and eu-LISA are currently already in the process of improving the mechanism. 
Kommissionen och eu-Lisa har redan inlett processen att frbttra mekanismen.
95 The issue of timing for reporting information has been addressed in the new European Border and Coast Guard Regulation which is expected to enter into force by the end of 2019 and which will repeal the current Eurosur Regulation. 
95. Problemet med tidsintervallen fr rapportering har tgrdats i den nya frordningen om den europeiska grns-och kustbevakningen som frvntas trda i kraft i slutet av 2019 och som kommer att upphva den nuvarande Eurosurfrordningen.
Recommendation 5 – Reduce delays in data entry The Commission accepts recommendation 5 (a). 
Rekommendation 5 Đ Minska frseningarna i uppgiftsinmatningen Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 5 a.
The Commission accepts recommendation 5 (b). 
Kommissionen godtar rekommendation 5 b.
The Commission agrees with the part concerning Eurosur. 
Kommissionen instmmer i den del som gller Eurosur.
This performance audit was carried out by Audit Chamber III External action/Security and justice, headed and led by ECA Member Bettina Jakobsen, supported by Katja Mattfolk, Head of Private Office and Kim Storup, Private Office Attaché; Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Principal Manager; Piotr Senator, Alexandre Tan and Mirko Iaconisi, Auditors. 
Denna effektivitetsrevision utfrdes av revisionsrttens avdelning III yttre tgrder, skerhet och rttvisa, dr ledamoten Bettina Jakobsen r ordfrande. Hon ledde revisionsarbetet med std av Katja Mattfolk (kanslichef), Kim Storup (attach), Alejandro Ballester Gallardo (frstechef) samt Piotr Senator, Alexandre Tan och Mirko Iaconisi (revisorer).
Michael Pyper provided linguistic support. 
Michael Pyper gav sprkligt std.
From left to right: Mirko Iaconisi, Piotr Senator, Michael Pyper, Bettina Jakobsen, Alejandro Ballester Gallardo, Katja Mattfolk. 
Frn vnster till hger: Mirko Iaconisi, Piotr Senator, Michael Pyper, Bettina Jakobsen, Alejandro Ballester Gallardo och Katja Mattfolk.
Timeline Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 17.4.2018 Official sending of draft report to Commission (or other auditee) 11.7.2019 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 8.10.2019 Commission’s (or other auditee’s) official replies received in all languages 31.10.2019 
Tidslinje Hndelse Datum Revisionsplanen antogs/Revisionen inleddes 17.4.2018 Den preliminra rapporten skickades till kommissionen (eller andra revisionsobjekt) 11.7.2019 Den slutliga rapporten antogs efter det kontradiktoriska frfarandet 8.10.2019 Kommissionens (eller andra revisionsobjekts) officiella svar hade tagits emot p alla sprk 31.10.2019
EN PDF ISBN 978-92-847-3858-8 doi:10.2865/83092 QJ-AB-19-020-EN-N EN HTML ISBN 978-92-847-3824-3 doi:10.2865/695262 QJ-AB-19-020-EN-Q 
SV PDF ISBN 978-92-847-3853-3 doi:10.2865/386566 QJ-AB-19-020-SV-N SV HTML ISBN 978-92-847-3809-0 doi:10.2865/118948 QJ-AB-19-020-SV-Q
The abolishment of border checks at the internal Schengen borders reinforced the importance of effective control and surveillance of the Schengen area external borders. 
Avskaffandet av grnskontroller vid Schengenomrdets inre grnser kade betydelsen av ndamlsenlig kontroll och vervakning av Schengenomrdets yttre grnser.
To help border guards control these, the EU has set up a number of information systems. 
Fr att hjlpa grnskontrolltjnstemn att kontrollera dem har EU upprttat ett antal informationssystem.
Our audit examined whether the main EU information systems for internal security support border controls efficiently. 
Vi underskte om EU:s viktigaste informationssystem fr inre skerhet stder grnskontroller p ett effektivt stt.
However, some data is currently not included in the systems, while other data is either not complete or not entered in a timely manner. 
Vissa uppgifter ingr dock fr nrvarande inte i systemen, och andra uppgifter r antingen inte fullstndiga eller frs inte in i tid.
We make a number of recommendations, e.g. that data quality procedures are improved and that delays in data entries and the time taken to correct identified weaknesses are reduced. 
Vi lmnar en rad rekommendationer, till exempel att frfarandena fr uppgifters kvalitet frbttras och att frseningarna i inmatningen av uppgifter och den tid det tar att korrigera identifierade brister minskas.
ECA special report pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU. 
Revisionsrttens srskilda rapport i enlighet med artikel 287.4 andra stycket i EUF-frdraget.
EN 2019 Special Report 21 Addressing antimicrobial resistance: progress in the animal sector, but this health threat remains a challenge for the EU NO 
SV 2019 Srskild rapport 21 Bekmpa antimikrobiell resistens: framsteg inom djursektorn, men detta hlsohot r fortfarande en utmaning fr EU nr
Contents Executive summary Introduction What is Antimicrobial Resistance Why fighting AMR is complicated Global actions to fight antimicrobial resistance EU actions to fight antimicrobial resistance Audit scope and approach Observations Commission and ECDC support for Member StatesŐ One Health approach has not yet delivered demonstrable results in reducing AMR Commission funded actions supported the fight against AMR but faced challenges ECDC actions provided valuable support to the Commission and Member States in fighting AMR There were gaps in information on outcomes and surveillance of AMR The prudent use of veterinary antimicrobials in the Member States has improved Some Member States have deployed successful strategies to reduce the use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine The new EU legal framework addressed some known weaknesses Monitoring of certain resistant bacteria in food and animals has improved, but gaps remain The EU budget provides significant support for AMR research but this has not yet resulted in major breakthroughs The Commission coordinates AMR research efforts but has not comprehensively evaluated its approach EU funded research produced some positive results, while struggling to address some significant challenges Paragraph I-IX 01-17 01-05 06-08 09-11 12-17 18-19 20-61 20-36 21-27 28-30 31-36 37-45 38-39 40-43 44-45 46-61 47-49 50-57 2 Commission initiatives have not yet resolved the market failures in antimicrobial research and development Conclusions and recommendations Annexes Annex I Đ Annual sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents for food-producing species, in mg/PCU, for selected European countries, from 2011 to 2016 Annex II Đ ND4BB projects mapped against the drug development process Acronyms and abbreviations Glossary Replies of the Commission Audit team Timeline 58-61 62-75 3 
EU:s budget ger betydande std till forskning om antimikrobiell resistens, men det har hittills inte lett till ngra strre genombrott Kommissionen samordnar forskningsinsatser som rr antimikrobiell resistens, men har inte utvrderat strategin p ett grundligt stt EU-finansierad forskning frde med sig vissa positiva resultat, men hade svrt att hantera en rad viktiga utmaningar Kommissionens initiativ har nnu inte lst marknadsmisslyckandena inom antimikrobiell forskning och utveckling Slutsatser och rekommendationer Bilagor Bilaga I Đ rlig frsljning av antimikrobiella veterinrmedicinska lkemedel fr livsmedelsproducerande arter, i milligram/korrigerad djurenhet, i utvalda europeiska lnder 2011Đ2016 Bilaga II Đ ND4BB-projekt i frhllande till utvecklingsprocessen fr lkemedel Akronymer, frkortningar och frklaringar Ordlista Kommissionens svar Granskningsteam Tidslinje 46Đ61 47Đ49 50Đ57 58Đ61 62Đ75 3
Executive summary I Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) - when microbes develop resistance against medicines that were previously able to fight them - is a growing threat to global health. 
Sammanfattning I Antimikrobiell resistens Đ nr mikrober utvecklar resistens mot lkemedel som tidigare kunde bekmpa dem Đ r ett vxande hot mot den globala hlsan.
The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control reported that it already leads to 33 000 deaths each year in the EU/EEA, mostly due to infections in hospitals and other healthcare settings. 
Europeiska centrumet fr frebyggande och kontroll av sjukdomar har rapporterat att antimikrobiell resistens redan leder till 33 000 ddsfall varje r i EU/EES, frmst p grund av infektioner p sjukhus och i andra hlso-och sjukvrdsmiljer.
The World Health OrganisationŐs ŇOne HealthÓ principle, which considers human health, animal health and the environment, recognises that an integrated approach to antimicrobials is needed. II Fighting against antimicrobial resistance is complicated. 
Enligt Vrldshlsoorganisationens ÓOne HealthÓ-princip, som tar hnsyn till mnniskors hlsa, djurhlsa och miljn, krvs en integrerad strategi fr antimikrobiella medel. II Det r komplicerat att bekmpa antimikrobiell resistens.
It is challenging to apply good infection prevention and control measures in practice (including practices as basic as hand washing). 
Det r svrt att tillmpa bra tgrder fr att frebygga och bekmpa infektioner i praktiken (till och med en s grundlggande praxis som att tvtta hnderna).
It is also challenging to use existing antimicrobials prudently (both to treat humans and animals), meaning using the right drug correctly and only when needed. Finally, no new classes of antibiotics have been discovered for many years. 
Det r ven en utmaning att anvnda befintliga antimikrobiella medel p ett ansvarsfullt stt (fr att behandla svl mnniskor som djur), det vill sga att anvnda rtt lkemedel p korrekt stt och enbart nr s krvs. Vidare var det mnga r sedan nya antibiotikaklasser upptcktes.
III In the EU, human health is a Member State competence. 
III I EU hr mnniskors hlsa till medlemsstaternas befogenheter.
Article 6 and 168 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union give the Union a mandate to support, coordinate, supplement and encourage cooperation between Member States for the protection and improvement of human health. 
Artiklarna 6 och 168 i frdraget om Europeiska unionens funktionsstt ger unionen befogenhet att stdja, samordna, komplettera och frmja samarbetet mellan medlemsstaterna fr att skydda och frbttra mnniskors hlsa.
Antimicrobial resistance is recognised by EU law as a serious cross-border threat to health, where EU action is required. 
Antimikrobiell resistens betraktas enligt EU:s lagstiftning som ett allvarligt grnsverskridande hot mot mnniskors hlsa som krver EU-tgrder.
Furthermore, there is clear Commission competence to act in veterinary issues, food safety, and research: all of which are relevant for antimicrobial resistance. 
Kommissionen har en tydlig befogenhet att agera nr det gller veterinra frgor, livsmedelsskerhet och forskning, vilka alla r relevanta nr det gller antimikrobiell resistens.
We examined how the Commission and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) managed resources aimed at supporting Member States One Health approach to antimicrobial resistance, and whether the framework to improve the prudent use of veterinary antimicrobials and monitor antimicrobial resistance in food was being well applied. 
Vi underskte hur kommissionen och Europeiska centrumet fr frebyggande och kontroll av sjukdomar (EDCD) frvaltade de resurser som syftar till att stdja medlemsstaternas One Health-modell fr antimikrobiell resistens, och om ramen fr att se till att anvndningen av antimikrobiella veterinrmedicinska lkemedel blir mer terhllsam och fr att vervaka antimikrobiell resistens i livsmedel tillmpades p ett bra stt.
V We conclude that the activities of the Commission and agencies have led to some progress, for example, in veterinary and food related issues. 
V Vi drar slutsatsen att kommissionens och byrernas tgrder har lett till vissa framsteg, till exempel nr det gller veterinra och livsmedelsrelaterade frgor.
However, there is little evidence to date that the health burden of AMR has been reduced in the European Union. 4 
Det finns dock i dagslget f bevis p att hlsobrdan till fljd av antimikrobiell resistens har minskats inom Europeiska unionen. 4
VI The Commission and ECDC support to strengthen Member States One Health approach to AMR was valuable, but had resulted in little demonstrable progress in reducing AMR. 
VI Kommissionens och ECDC:s std som syftade till att strka medlemsstaternas One Health-modell fr antimikrobiell resistens var vrdefullt, men ledde inte till srskilt mnga pvisbara framsteg mot minskad antimikrobiell resistens.