natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Because of the regional nature of Objectives 2 and 5b and the national nature of Objectives 3 and 4, double counting of expenditure also occurs frequently. 
P grund av att ml 2 och 5b till sin karaktr r regionala och ml 3 och 4 nationella frekommer ven ofta att utgifter rknas dubbelt.
In addition, cases occur where expenditure which should not have been taken into account is included in the analyses. 
Dessutom frekommer fall dr utgifter som inte borde ha beaktats inkluderas i analyserna.
In Germany, for Objective 1, unemployment benefit was treated as structural assistance. 
I Tyskland fr ml 1 rknades arbetslshetsunderstd som strukturstd.
It is almost impossible to identify all of the relevant expenditure (21). 
Det r s gott som omjligt att faststlla alla berrda utgifter (21).
For this reason, all the Member States have introduced simplifications. 
Av denna orsak har alla medlemsstater infrt frenklingar.
However, the rationale for these simplifications is not always economic, but is based on the availability of data, with the result that a consistent approach cannot be guaranteed. 
Grunden till dessa r emellertid inte alltid ekonomisk, utan baseras p uppgifternas tillgnglighet, vilket leder till att ett enhetligt tillvgagngsstt inte kan garanteras.
For example, the French authorities only took into account expenditure recorded in national plan contracts between the State and the regions. 
Till exempel de franska myndigheterna beaktade enbart utgifter som tagits med i utvecklingsplansavtalen mellan staten och regionerna.
In the SPD No 1, they undertook to transmit to the Commission, before 31 December 1994, a new indicative financial table including an estimation of all of the public expenditure eligible for the SFs, based on significant information covering most of the expenditure at stake in the eligible areas. 
Dessa tog sig i det samlade programplaneringsdokumentet fr ml 1 att fre den 31 december 1994 versnda till kommissionen en ny vgledande finansiell versikt som innehller en uppskattning av samtliga offentliga utgifter som berttigar till std frn strukturfonderna, grundad p de viktigaste posterna som omfattar huvuddelen av de berrda utgifterna betrffande de stdberttigade omrdena och med utgngspunkt i vilken efterlevnaden av additionalitetsprincipen skall kontrolleras.
In the case of Objectives 3 and 4, the Commission had already acknowledged the difficulty, or even the impossibility, of establishing all of the expenditure in the ESFŐs sphere of intervention (22). 
Vad gller ml 3 och 4 har kommissionen redan konstaterat (22) svrigheterna, till och med omjligheten att faststlla alla utgifter inom ESF:s verksamhetsomrde.
For this reason, it decided to take a representative sample of bodies as a basis for the period 1994 to 1999. 
Av denna orsak har man fr perioden 1994Đ1999 beslutat anvnda ett representativt urval av organ som grund.
However, since its underlying hypotheses were not confirmed, this approach does not enable the observance of additionality to be verified correctly, because comparisons are made between dissimilar elements. 
Eftersom de underliggande antagandena inte har bekrftats medger ett dylikt tillvgagngsstt emellertid inte en korrekt kontroll av att additionalitetsprincipen efterlevts, eftersom jmfrelserna gjorts mellan element som inte r likvrdiga.
In fact, assistance in the field of Objectives 3 and 4 is especially variable, being dependent in particular on the business cycle, and it was not stable during the two periods under comparison. 
I sjlva verket varierar stdtgrderna inom ml 3 och 4 srskilt mycket, bland annat p grund av rdande konjunktur, och har inte varit de samma under de tv perioder som jmfrts.
In addition, choosing the bodies which are among the largest beneficiaries of the Social Fund produces results more relevant to the verification of co-financing than of additionality. Overlapping of periods 51. 
Dessutom ledde valet av organ bland de strsta mottagarna av std frn Europeiska socialfonden till resultat som lg nrmare kontroll av samfinansiering n kontroll av additionaliteten. verlappning av perioder 51.
Another major difficulty concerns the overlapping of periods. The verification of additionality must in fact enable the expenditure trend during the programming period to be 
Ett annat stort problem r att perioderna verlappar varandra. Kontrollen av additionaliteten skall i sjlva verket gra det
C 68/14 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 9.3.2000 compared with a reference period. 
C 68/14 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 9.3.2000 mjligt att jmfra utgifternas utveckling under programplaneringsperioden med en referensperiod.
But the actual programming period does not necessarily coincide with the calendar years taken into consideration. 
Programplaneringsperioden sammanfaller emellertid inte ndvndigtvis med de kalenderr som berrs.
In fact, in addition to possible extensions to the period in order to fulfil commitments, there is a minimum extension of two years for making the payments, which always results in the simultaneous implementation of at least two periods. 
Till de eventuella frlngningarna av perioden fr fullgrande av taganden tillkommer en frlngning p minst tv r fr genomfrande av betalningarna, vilket alltid leder till att minst tv perioder genomfrs samtidigt.
If the aim is to match up the payments with the programming period to which they belong, it is necessary to wait for at least two more years, and also to make numerous additional adjustments in order to charge expenditure which was completed after the calendar years to which the relevant CSF refers. 
Om syftet r att hnfra betalningarna till den programplaneringsperiod de tillhr mste man vnta minst tv r till och ven gra ett flertal ytterligare justeringar fr att pfra motsvarande ramar fr gemenskapsstd de utgifter som uppsttt under kalenderren i frga.
This method would be possible as far as co-financed expenditure is concerned, but it does not solve the problem of non-co-financed expenditure, which must also be taken into account. 
Denna metod skulle kunna anvndas fr de samfinansierade utgifterna, men den lser inte problemet med utgifter som inte samfinansieras, som ven de mste beaktas.
The other possibility is to deal only with expenditure during the calendar years under consideration, without reference to which CSF each item belongs to. 
Den andra mjligheten bestr i att endast behandla de utgifter som uppsttt under de berrda kalenderren, utan hnsyn till vilken ram fr gemenskapsstd de hnfr sig till.
This approach is a pragmatic one, but it departs from the rationale behind the operation of the SFs. 
Detta tillvgagngsstt r pragmatiskt, men det ligger lngt ifrn logiken bakom strukturfondernas funktion.
This second option was chosen by the Commission in 1996, when some Member States had adopted the first approach. 
Detta andra alternativ valdes av kommissionen r 1996, efter det att vissa medlemsstater redan anvnt sig av det frstnmnda tillvgagngssttet.
However, the ex ante verifications for the 1994 to 1999 period and the tables included in the corresponding CSFs/SPDs assumed that final payments for all the appropriations would be made during these years. 
Frhandskontrollerna fr perioden 1994Đ1999 och motsvarande tabeller i ramarna fr gemenskapsstd/de samlade programplaneringsdokumenten har emellertid genomfrts enligt hypotesen att slutbetalningarna av alla anslag skulle ske under dessa r.
This hypothesis was unrealistic in the light of the implementing provisions of the Funds. 
I ljuset av fondernas genomfrandebestmmelser var denna hypotes inte realistisk.
It should be noted that numerous measures from the 1989 to 1993 period have not yet been closed, that there have been delays with regard to the 1994 to 1996 period for Objective 2 which have resulted in large amounts of the Funds being transferred to the 1997 to 1999 period, and that the majority of measures for the 1994 to 1999 period will not be closed until 2002. 
Det br noteras att flera tgrder fr perioden 1989Đ1993 inte nnu avslutats, att perioden 1994Đ1996 fr ml 2 har frsenats, vilket medfrt betydande verfringar av medel till perioden 1997Đ1999, och att strsta delen av tgrderna under period 1994Đ1999 inte kommer att avslutas frrn frn och med r 2002.
Most Member States analyse national expenditure on the basis of payments. 
Majoriteten av medlemsstaterna utfr sina analyser av de nationella utgifterna med utgngspunkt i betalningar.
Other Member States, such as France and Belgium, use budgetary commitments, at either the forecast or implementation stage. 
Andra medlemsstater ssom Frankrike och Belgien anvnder sig av preliminra eller genomfrda budgettaganden.
Paradoxically, one of the weakest aspects of additionality calculations are the figures established for expenditure under the CSFs/SPDs, both with regard to the SFs and their national counterparts. 
Paradoxalt nog r en av de svagaste aspekterna av additio-nalitetsberkningarna de utgifter som utbetalas inom ramarna fr gemenskapsstd/de samlade programplaneringsdokumenten, bde vad gller strukturfonderna och deras nationella motsvarigheter.
Several Member States merely set out in the various tables the SF financing plans and those of their national counterparts as submitted in the CSFs/SPDs. 
Flera medlemsstater infr i de olika tabellerna endast strukturfondernas och deras nationella motsvarigheters finansieringsplaner, ssom dessa framlggs i ramarna fr gemenskapsstd/de samlade programplaneringsdokumenten.
For the years that have already been closed, payments are still mixed together with forecasts or commitments. 
Fr budgetr som redan har avslutats upptrder betalningarna fortfarande tillsammans med berkningar eller taganden.
Starting point and comparability of data 58. 
Utgngslge och uppgifternas jmfrbarhet 58.
The structural expenditure trend for a period must be compared with the previous situation. 
Strukturutgifternas utveckling under en viss period skall kunna jmfras med det tidigare lget.
For the 1989 to 1993 period, the Member States were left to choose between the 1987 to 1988 period or the average of these two years. 
Fr perioden 1989Đ1993 fick medlemsstaterna sjlva vlja mellan ren 1987 och 1988 eller medeltalet av dessa tv r.
Leaving it up to the Member State to choose the reference period, when the various results are already known, does not seem very well advised. 
Det frefaller inte s frnuftigt att lta medlemsstaterna vlja referensperiod nr de olika resultaten vl r knda.
In certain cases, such as Objective 2 in the Netherlands or Objectives 3 and 4 in France, the choice of reference period may be decisive, in that one may oblige the auditor to conclude that the principle has not been abided by and the other may have the opposite effect. 
I vissa fall, som fr ml 2 i Nederlnderna eller ml 3 och 4 i Frankrike kan valet av referensperiod vara avgrande fr slutsatsen om huruvida principen iakttagits eller inte.
For the 1994 to 1999 generation, the reference period used is the previous one, except for the new Member States, which were able to decide on a period during the ex ante verification. For Objective 6 in the 1995 to 1999 generation, the reference periods chosen by Sweden and Finland were 1991 to 1992 and 1993 respectively. 
Fr generationen 1994Đ1999 anvnds fregende period som referensperiod, utom fr de nya medlemsstaterna, som har kunnat besluta sig fr en viss referensperiod under frhandskon-trollen, Fr ml 6 i generationen 1995Đ1999 har Sverige och Finland valt 1991Đ1992 respektive 1993 som referensperiod.
One difficulty concerns the comparison of data from one period with data from the previous one, for the potentially eligible expenditure in one period is not necessarily the same as that for the previous period, when changes in the provisions of the regulations are taken into account. 
Ett stort problem gller jmfrandet av uppgifterna frn en period med dem frn fregende period. De potentiellt stdberttigande utgifterna under en viss period r ndvndigtvis inte de samma som under fregende period, om man beaktar eventuella ndringar av bestmmelserna i frordningarna.
To make it possible to make reliable comparisons the tables must be adjusted to the new circumstances; for example, the tables for the 1989 to 1993 period must be recalculated, taking into account the newly-eligible areas and categories of expenditure. 
Fr att kunna gra tillfrlitliga jmfrelser r det ndvndigt att tabellerna anpassas till den nya situationen, till exempel br tabellerna ver perioden 1989Đ1993 rknas om fr att beakta de nya stdberttigade omrdena och utgiftskategorierna.
There are cases where, within the context of the new definition of Objective 4, expenditure categories for this Objective were included in the data for the 1994 to 1999 period but were ignored for the previous period. 
Inom ramen fr den nya definitionen av ml 4 frekommer det att utgiftskategorier fr detta ml infrs i uppgifterna fr perioden 1994Đ1999, men att de ignoreras fr fregende period.
The result of this is an artificial increase in expenditure (23). 
Detta leder till en konstlad kning av utgifterna (23).
The same phenomenon occurs frequently in other Objectives for certain expenditure categories. 
Samma fenomen frekommer ofta inom vriga ml i frga om vissa utgiftskategorier.
Privatisations are one of the specific economic circumstances which must be taken into account within the context of additionality. 
Privatiseringarna utgr en av de srskilda ekonomiska omstndigheter som skall beaktas nr det gller additionaliteten.
Several verification procedures provide that the national authorities are to notify the Commission of any partial or total privatisation so that, working in partnership, they may establish, on a case-by-case basis, the procedures for taking account of them. 
I flera kontrollbestmmelser faststlls att de nationella myndigheterna skall underrtta kommissionen om alla partiella eller totala privatiseringar s att dessa i samarbete frn fall till fall kan bestmma hur de skall tas i beaktande.
Little use has been made of these provisions. 
Denna bestmmelse har inte utnyttjats i ngon strre utstrckning.
In most cases, verifications have continued to be carried out as if nothing had changed, in the absence of a precise methodological framework. 
Oftast har kontrollerna, i avsaknad av exakta faststllda frfaranden fortsatt som om ingenting hade hnt.
In other cases, the Commission left it up to the Member States to choose between excluding or including the relevant expenditure in the tables for the two periods. 
I andra fall har kommissionen ltit medlemsstaterna vlja om de vill utesluta de berrda utgifterna ur tabellerna fr de tv perioderna eller om de vill lta dem st kvar.
In cases where this expenditure has decreased, it is entirely in the interest of the Member State, which is already aware of the results, to exclude it. 
I de fall dr utgifterna har minskat har medlemsstaterna som redan knner till resultatet allt intresse av att utgifterna utesluts.
Given the significance of the areas involved (telecommunications, energy, etc.), this step alone may bring 
Med beaktande av de berrda rubrikernas betydelse (telekommunikation, energi osv.) kan denna enkla tgrd
9.3.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 68/15 about a substantial change in the final result. 
9.3.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 68/15 ha betydande fljder fr slutresultatet.
It should also be noted that the private sector is, to an increasing extent, taking over investments which were traditionally the responsibility of the public sector (24). 
Det br ven noteras att den privata sektorn i allt hgre grad tar ver investeringar som traditionellt sett legat p den offentliga sektorn (24).
This phenomenon has not been taken into account for the comparisons either. 
Inte heller detta fenomen har beaktats vid jmfrelserna.
The significant efforts made by several Member States to improve their methodology in recent years have not always been accompanied by adjustments in respect of previous years, in particular the reference period, because of the complexity and cost of doing so. 
Medlemsstaternas betydande anstrngningar fr att frbttra frfarandena har under de senaste ren inte alltid tfljts av justeringar fr tidigare r, i synnerhet inte fr referensperioden, p grund av de svrigheter och hga kostnader som detta skulle medfra.
For this reason, it is difficult to make correct comparisons, and extrapolations and estimates have had to be made. 
Det r drfr svrt att gra lmpliga jmfrelser och man har varit tvungen att anvnda extrapoleringar och uppskattningar.
Geographical breakdown of expenditure 64. 
Uppdelning av utgifterna per omrde 64.
For the geographical breakdown of expenditure, taking into account the difficulty of identifying it by eligible area under Objectives 2 and 5b, the Commission has agreed to a pragmatic approach, which involves allocating regional or even national expenditure to the relevant areas mainly in proportion to their population or their surface area. 
Mot bakgrund av svrigheterna att identifiera utgifterna fr enskilda omrden som r berttigade till std enligt ml 2 och 5b har kommissionen fr den geografiska frdelningen av utgifterna godknt ett pragmatiskt tillvgagngsstt som innebr att regionala och till och med nationella utgifter frdelas p de enskilda omrdena enligt deras befolkningsmngd eller areal.
This method compromises the reliability of the verification of the principle of additionality within the context of Objectives 2 and 5b. 
Detta tillvgagngsstt ventyrar tillfrlitligheten hos kontrollen av att additionalitetsprincipen efterlevts i frga om ml 2 och 5b.
The starting hypothesis is that structural expenditure is divided equally between the eligible and non-eligible areas. 
Utgngshypotesen r att strukturutgifterna frdelas jmnt i de stdberttigade och de icke stdberttigade omrdena.
This is a simplification which, of necessity, gives rise to overestimates or underestimates and thus makes it impossible to determine whether, in the eligible areas, the SFs have replaced any national expenditure or not. 
Detta r en frenkling som oundvikligen ger upphov till ver-eller underskattningar som inte gr det mjligt att faststlla om strukturfonderna inom de stdberttigade omrdena har ersatt nationella utgifter eller inte.
Some confusion concerning the eligible regions and areas has also been detected. 
Det har ven frekommit oklarheter betrffande de stdberttigade regionerna och omrdena.
In Italy, expenditure for two areas which were not eligible under Objective 2 (Trento and Bolzano) was included. 
I Italien har man lagt till utgifterna fr Trento och Bolzano, tv icke stdberttigade omrden.
For Objective 5b for the 1994 to 1999 period, the regions examined initially were those which had been eligible in the previous period. 
Fr ml 5b fr perioden 1994Đ1999 analyserades ursprungligen de regioner som varit stdberttigade under fregende period.
68. The treatment of Community initiatives and other Community measures also poses many problems. 
68. ven hanteringen av gemenskapens initiativ och vriga tgrder orsakar mnga problem.
The ex ante verifications have not dealt with this important issue. 
Vid frhandskontrollerna har denna viktiga frga inte tagits upp.
Few Member States, with the exception of those which are eligible in their entirety under Objective 1, took Community initiatives into account. 
F medlemsstater, utver dem som r fullt berttigade till std enligt ml 1, har tagit gemenskapsinitiativen i beaktande.
While it is true that identifying these initiatives and breaking them down on a geographical basis cannot easily be done, the majority of the Member States simply ignored the issue. 
Visserligen r det inte ltt att identifiera dessa initiativ och gra en geografisk uppdelning av dem men denna problematik har helt enkelt ignorerats av de flesta medlemsstater.
As a result, assistance which comes under this type of programme is classified as being wholly nationally financed, so that the Member StateŐs structural assistance is artificially inflated. 
Till fljd av detta anses std under ett dylikt program vara i sin helhet nationellt finansierat, vilket leder till en artificiell hjning av medlemsstatens strukturstd.
In addition, in two Member States (F and UK), Community initiatives were duly taken into account for the reference period (1989 to 1993), but not for the period subject to verification (1994 to 1999), further distorting the results. 
I tv medlemsstater (F och UK) beaktades dessutom gemenskapsinitiativen p ett korrekt stt fr referensperioden (1989Đ1993), men inte fr den period som var freml fr kontroll (1994Đ1999), vilket frvrngde resultaten ytterligare.
CONCLUSION 69. 
SLUTSATS 69.
Although the principle of additionality (non-replacement of national expenditure by Structural Funds appropriations) is relatively clear, considerable difficulties have been encountered in its application in practice because of the limited development of concepts and methodology relating to its content. 
Trots att additionalitetsprincipen r relativt klar (medel frn strukturfonderna skall inte erstta nationellt std) har man sttt p betydande svrigheter vid omsttningen av principen i praktiken p grund av den begrnsade utvecklingen av begrepp och metodologi i frga om vad principen omfattar.
The partnership between the Commission and the Member States has not succeeded in finding effective procedures for verifying the principle of additionality. 
Kommissionen och medlemsstaterna har inte lyckats finna fungerande bestmmelser vad gller kontrollen av att additionalitetsprincipen efterlevs.
In short, it is necessary for the content of the principle of additionality to be properly established by seeking appropriate, fixed methodology which would make verification of the principle feasible. 
Det r absolut ndvndigt att additionalitetsprincipens innehll hlls under kontroll genom att man tar fram en lmplig och fast metod som mjliggr kontroll.
Furthermore, the Commission ought to provide itself with the tools needed to analyse the consistency and plausibility of the data sent in by the Member States. 
Dessutom br kommissionen anvnda de instrument som behvs fr att analysera samstmmigheten och tillfrlitligheten hos de uppgifter som medlemsstaterna versnder.
The obligations imposed by the regulations on the Member States to maintain structural expenditure and to provide the Commission with the appropriate financial data have not been backed up by sanctions or other legal consequences. 
De skyldigheter att bibehlla strukturstdet och att tillstlla kommissionen lmplig ekonomisk information som lggs medlemsstaterna i frordningarna har inte tfljs av sanktionsmeka-nismer eller andra rttsliga pfljder.
None of the Member States identify and register all the structural assistance interventions in the eligible regions by national, regional and local government, bodies carrying out a public service function and, under certain conditions, public and private undertakings. 
I ingen medlemsstat grs uppskattningar ver alla strukturtgrder som de nationella, regionala eller lokala frvaltningarna, organ som utfr offentliga tjnster samt, under vissa villkor, offentliga och privata fretag genomfrt i de stdberttigade regionerna.
Considerable individual efforts are made in various Member States to attempt to record all cases of assistance, but because of the size of the task the results can never be considered reliable. 
Enskilda medlemsstater har gjort betydande anstrngningar fr att sammanstlla samtliga interventioner, men p grund av uppgiftens omfattning kommer resultaten aldrig att kunna anses som tillfrlitliga.
In addition, it is difficult to verify the whole process because of the large number of estimates and hypotheses included therein. 
I ljuset av det stora antalet uppskattningar och hypoteser r det dessutom svrt att kontrollera processen i sin helhet.