natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 gives the possibility to Member States to use such a database in this context on the conditions that the database offers, to the satisfaction of the Member State, adequate assurances as to the accuracy of the data it contains for the purpose of the extensification payment scheme. 
Genom frordning (EG) nr 1254/1999 ges medlemsstaterna mjligheten att anvnda sdana databaser i detta sammanhang, under frutsttning att databasen ger medlemsstaten tillfredsstllande garanti fr att de uppgifter den innehller r korrekta fr anvndning i ordningen fr extensifieringsersttning.
Firstly, it is for the Member State to evaluate to what extent the available database allows it to respect this requirement. 
Det r i frsta hand medlemsstatens uppgift att bedma i vilken utstrckning den tillgngliga databasen mjliggr detta.
Member States are not obliged to use this database as a control tool. 
Medlemsstaterna r inte tvungna att anvnda denna databas som ett kontrollinstrument.
The computerised database is indeed one of the methods to be used, at the choice of the Member State, to count the animals according to Article 32(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2342/ 1999. 
De datoriserade uppgifterna r en av de metoder som medlemsstaterna kan vlja att anvnda fr att rkna djur enligt artikel 32.3 i frordning (EG) nr 2342/1999.
As regards accuracy of the data relating to calculation of livestock units in France, the Commission services have already noted the problem and action is being evaluated as a part of the ongoing clearance of accounts procedure. 
Nr det gller uppgifternas korrekthet i samband med berkning av djurenheter i Frankrike har kommissionens enheter redan noterat problemet, och tgrder hller p att utvrderas i samband med den pgende rkenskapsavslutningen.
The CommissionŐs services have decided not to apply the penalties provided for in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 296/96 in view of the difficulties referred to by the French authorities. 
Kommissionens enheter har beslutat att inte tillmpa de pfljder somfreskrivsiartikel4ifrordning(EG)nr296/96medhn-syn till de problem den franska administrationen tar upp.
These difficulties are due partly to the changes in the conditions for granting premiums under Agenda 2000 and partly to the fact that a new computer system took longer to develop than originally expected. 
Dessa problem bestr dels i ndringen av villkoren fr beviljande av bidrag inom ramen fr Agenda 2000, dels i utvecklingen av ett nytt datorsystem, vilket tagit lngre tid n planerat.
The CommissionŐs services conducted on-the-spot audit missions on extensification payments in France. 
Kommissionens enheter utfrde revisionsbesk p plats avseende extensifieringsersttning i Frankrike.
The CommissionŐs services have regularly urged Member States to better integrate their controls. 
Kommissionens enheter har regelbundet uppmanat medlemsstaterna att integrera sina kontroller p ett bttre stt.
Indeed, although provided by the previous IACS Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92, the new Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 even further facilitates this arrangement. 
Detta freskrivs i den tidigare IAKS-frordningen (EEG) nr 3887/92, men underlttas ytterligare genom den nya frordningen (EG) nr 2419/2001.
It is, of course, for Member States themselves to rearrange their organisational procedures as appropriate. In the event that this absence could create a risk to the Fund, appropriate action should be taken under the clearance of accounts procedure. 
Det r naturligtvis medlemsstaternas sak att ndra sina organisationsrutiner p lmpligt stt. Om denna frnvaro skulle innebra en risk fr fondens medel, vidtas lmpliga tgrder vid rkenskapsavslutningen.
27, 50 and 53(f). 
27, 50 och 53 f.
As a consequence of the CommissionŐs servicesŐ audit findings, the new IACS Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001 explicitly requires the risk analysis suggested by the Court. 
Till fljd av resultaten frn den revision som utfrts av kommissionens enheter krvs den riskanalys som revisionsrtten freslr uttryckligen i den nya IAKS-frordningen (EG) nr 2419/2001.
In respect of Ireland and France, the Commission services made written recommendations for such a risk analysis factor already in 1999. 
Nr det gller Irland och Frankrike lmnade kommissionens enheter redan 1999 skriftliga rekommendationer fr en sdan riska-nalysfaktor.
IACS Regulations lay down the control requirements. 
I IAKS-frordningarna faststlls kontrollkraven.
It is one of the prime roles of the Commission services to establish and encourage best practice. 
En de viktigaste uppgifterna fr kommissionens enheter r att faststlla och frmja bsta praxis.
In the cases of France, Spain and the United Kingdom, as well as several other Member States, the clearance of accounts procedure begun with on-the-spot audits in 2000 and 2001, is continuing. 
Nr det gller Frankrike, Spanien och Frenade kungariket, och flera andra medlemsstater, fortstter det arbete med rkenskapsavslutning som inleddes med revisionsbesk p plats under 2000 och 2001.
The specific problem raised by the Court in respect of the United Kingdom will be followed up in the clearance of accounts procedure. 
Det specifika problem revisionsrtten nmner betrffande Frenade kungariket kommer att fljas upp vid rkenskapsavslutningen.
33. The fact that certain French eligible producers were paid EPS without requesting it expressly is in contradiction with Article 32(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2342/1999. 
Revisionsrttens slutsatser om extensifierings-33. Det faktum att vissa franska stdberttigade producenter fick extensifieringsbidrag utan att uttryckligen begra det strider mot artikel 32.1 i kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 2342/1999.
25.11.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 290/21 COMMISSIONŐS INFORMATION ON IMPACT OF EPS IS INSUFFICIENT 34 and 35. 
25.11.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 290/21 KOMMISSIONENS INFORMATION OM EFFEKTERNA AV ST DORDNINGEN F R EXTENSIFIERINGSERSTTNING R OTILLRCKLIG 34 och 35.
The information provided by Member States according to Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 2342/1999 cumulated over a number of years will be used by the Commission to measure its impact. 
Den information medlemsstaterna har lmnat i enlighet med artikel 46 i frordning (EG) nr 2342/1999, ackumulerad ver ett antal r, kommer att anvndas av kommissionen fr att mta effekter.
The experience acquired up to now is too short to carry out this exercise (only payments for year 2000 are known at this moment). 
De erfarenheter som gjorts hittills r fr f fr att detta skall kunna gras nu (i dagslget r endast betalningar fr r 2000 knda).
IMPACT OF EPS 35. The Commission has planned and will carry out an evaluation of the market in beef and veal in 2004/2005 and will study the impact of the various instruments planned in this sector, particularly the new extensification premium scheme introduced by Agenda 2000. 39 to 43. 
EFFEKTER AV ST DORDNINGEN F R EXTENSIFIERINGSERSTTNING 35. Kommissionen har planerat och kommer att genomfra en utvrdering av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr ntktt 2004/2005. Man kommer att analysera de olika effekterna av de olika instrument som freskrivs fr denna sektor, srskilt den nya ordning fr extensifieringsbidrag som infrdes genom Agenda 2000.
The Commission considers it as a positive impact of the extensification payment, that producers, even already engaged in extensive production, may continue to produce a different quality of bovine meat corresponding to consumer expectations by receiving an additional support allowing them to compensate higher production costs. 
39Đ43. Kommissionen ser det som en positiv effekt av extensifieringsbidraget att producenter, ven om de redan bedriver extensiv produktion, kan fortstta producera ntktt av en annan kvalitet, som motsvarar konsumenternas krav, genom att de fr ytterligare std som kan kompensera hgre produktionskostnader.
Given the negative evolution on the bovine meat market due to successive sanitary crises, the Commission considers that without such specific support, extensive producers would have been driven to abandon this way of producing beef. 
Mot bakgrund av ntkttsmarknadens negativa utveckling till fljd av flera p varandra fljande hlsokriser anser kommissionen att de extensiva producenterna inte skulle ha kunnat fortstta med denna typ av ntkttsproduktion om det inte hade funnits ett srskilt std.
The Commission points out that the scheme is in its start-up stage and an evaluation will be carried out in 2004. 
Kommissionen betonar att ordningen fortfarande r ny, och att en utvrdering kommer att gras under 2004.
The Council agreed on the principle to grant the extensification payment for dairy cows to producers where the holding is located in Member States and Ômore than 50 % of milk production takes place in mountain areas within the meaning of Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999Ő. 
Rdet instmde i principen om beviljande av extensifieringsersttning fr mjlkkor till producenter vars jordbruksfretag terfinns i medlemsstater dr Ómer n 50 % av mjlkproduktionen sker i bergsomrden i enlighet med frordning (EG) nr 1257/ 1999Ó.
On this basis, the Commission had to decide in 1999 which Member States in fact met these conditions. 
Utifrn denna utgngspunkt var kommissionen tvungen att besluta 1999 vilka medlemsstater som uppfyllde detta villkor.
Following the examination by the Commission of the situation in each Member State, considering the criteria set out by the Council, only Austria and Finland were found as meeting these requirements. 
Efter kommissionens granskning av situationen i varje medlemsstat betrffande de kriterier som faststllts av rdet kom man fram till att endast sterrike och Finland motsvarade kraven.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 46. 
SLUTSATS OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 46.
By defining new and stricter conditions for granting the extensification payment, the Agenda 2000 reform introduced a larger differentiation between the common stocking density and the stocking density for the purpose of the extensification payment. 
I Agenda 2000 faststlldes nya och strngare villkor fr beviljande av extensifieringsersttning, vilket innebar strre skillnad mellan vanlig djurtthet och djurtthet med avseende p extensifieringsersttning.
The question raised by the Court is examined in the study carried out for the purposes of the proposal for a mid-term review of Agenda 2000 which is intended partly to limit the obligation to produce in order to benefit from premiums and partly to reinforce cross-compliance. 
Den frga revisionsrtten tar upp granskades i den analys som gjordes fr att utarbeta frslaget till granskning efter halva tiden av Agenda 2000, i syfte dels att begrnsa skyldigheten att producera fr att f bidrag, dels att skrpa miljkraven.
As already stated under point 21, the motivations and justifications for agri-environmental schemes and compensatory allowances are fundamentally different from the EPS direct premiums. 
Som redan angivits i punkt 21 skiljer sig motiveringar och motiv fr systemen fr miljtgrder i jordbruket och kompensationsbidrag p ett grundlggande stt frn de direkta bidragen enligt stdordningen fr extensifieringsersttning.
Clear legal provisions ensure consistency between these schemes and the exclusion of double funding. 
Det finns tydliga rttsliga bestmmelser som skerstller verensstmmelse mellan dessa ordningar och att det inte utgr dubbel ersttning.
The direct-payments scheme established by the Agenda 2000 is based on the normal functioning of a computerised database laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1760/2000 on identification and registration of bovine animals. 
Den ordning fr direkta betalningar som upprttades genom Agenda 2000 baseras p att den databas som faststlls genom frordning (EG) nr 1760/2000 om identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur fungerar normalt.
Some Member States have not been able to set up such a computerised database in time. 
Vissa medlemsstater har inte kunnat upprtta sdana databaser i tid.
It is for the Member State to evaluate which limit in the available database allows it to respect the regulatory requirements. 
Det r i frsta hand medlemsstaternas uppgift att utvrdera i vilken mn den tillgngliga databasen gr det mjligt att flja freskrifterna.
As a consequence of the CommissionŐs servicesŐ audit findings, the new IACS regulation explicitly requires the risk analysis suggested by the Court. 
Till fljd av resultaten frn den revision som utfrts av kommissionens enheter krvs den riskanalys som revisionsrtten freslr uttryckligen i den nya IAKS-frordningen.
The Commission services will take into account the CourtŐs comments on individual Member StatesŐ implementing systems in its clearance of accounts procedure. 
Kommissionens enheter kommer att beakta revisionsrttens kommentarer om enskilda medlemsstaters system fr genomfrande vid rkenskapsavslutningen.
With respect to the problems related to the United Kingdom, the Commission has refused the interpretation of the Member State concerned. 
Nr det gller problemen rrande Frenade kungariket har kommissionen inte godtagit den berrda medlemsstatens tolkning.
Extensive production methods generally imply higher costs for producers. 
Extensiva produktionsmetoder innebr i allmnhet strre kostnader fr producenterna.
This higher cost derives mainly from the need to have at oneŐs disposal, by buying or renting it, a larger area available for feeding animals. 
Dessa strre kostnader hrrr vanligen frn behovet av att ha tillgng till ett strre omrde fr utfodring av djur (genom att kpa eller hyra omrdet).
The crop of this area is not sold directly but is used as an intermediary means of production. 
Grdorna p detta omrde sljs inte direkt, utan anvnds som produktionsmedel.
This cost does not exist in the same proportion for a more intensive producer, as the purchase of cereal-based feedingstuffs is less expensive. 
Denna kostnad r inte lika stor fr en mer intensiv producent, eftersom det r billigare att kpa spannmlsbaserat foder.
By compensating the extensive producer for this additional cost and specific effort to produce bovine meat of a specific quality, the extensification scheme works as an incentive as defined by the Council. 
Genom att kompensera de extensiva producenterna fr denna extra kostnad och fr deras anstrngning fr att producera ntktt av srskild kvalitet, fungerar ordningen fr extensifiering som ett incitament p det stt som angivits av rdet.
C 290/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 25.11.2002 From a market point of view, as it is based on a longer process of rearing animals than a more intensive production, extensive production is an element in favour of maintaining regularity and equilibrium on the market. 
C 290/22 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 25.11.2002 Ur marknadssynpunkt frmjar extensiv produktion, eftersom den baseras p en lngre process fr djuruppfdning n mer intensiv produktion, bibehllandet av regelbundenhet och jmvikt p marknaden.
This is particularly the case in Member States where extensive beef production is traditionally employed and availability of land coexist. 
Detta gller i synnerhet i medlemsstater dr man traditionellt anvnder extensiv ntkttsproduktion och det finns tillgng till mark.
The scheme is in its start-up stage and the Commission has planned and will carry out the assessment of the common organisation of the market in beef and veal in 2004/2005 and will analyse the impact of the various instruments planned in this sector, particularly the new extensification premium introduced by Agenda 2000. 
Ordningen r i sitt inledningsskede och kommissionen har planerat och kommer att genomfra en utvrdering av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr ntktt under 2004/ 2005 samt analysera effekterna av de olika instrument som freskrivs fr denna sektor, srskilt den nya ordning fr extensifieringsbidrag som infrdes genom Agenda 2000.
Although provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92, amended by Regulation (EC) No 1678/ 98, as from 1 January 1999, integrated on-the-spot checks became a regulatory requirement, where appropriate, with the introduction of the new IACS regulation as from 1 January 2002. (f) The Commission has already recommended to several of the Member States, visited by the Court, that their risk analysis should incorporate specific risk factors to select producers close to their stocking density threshold. 
Integrerade kontroller p plats blev, ven om de freskrivs i frordning (EEG) nr 3887/92, ndrad genom frordning (EG) nr 1678/98, fr.o.m. den 1 januari 1999, obligatoriska i tillmpliga fall fr.o.m. den 1 januari 2002 genom infrandet av den nya IAKS-frordningen. f) Kommissionen har redan rekommenderat flera av de medlemsstater som beskts av revisionsrtten att i sin riskanalys ta med specifika riskfaktorer fr att vlja ut producenter som befinner sig nra grnsvrdet fr djurtthet.
These recommendations were further reinforced as from 1 January 2002 by Art 19(1)(f) of the new IACS regulation, which introduced the new factor Ôthose farmers who are either just above or below ceilings or limits relevant for the granting of aidsŐ. 
Dessa rekommendationer frstrktes fr.o.m. den 1 januari 2002 genom artikel 19.1 f i den nya IAKS-frordningen, dr den nya faktorn Óde jordbrukare som ligger strax ver eller under tak eller grnser som r av betydelse fr att std skall beviljasÓ infrdes.
22.10.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 6/2002 on the audit of the CommissionŐs management of the Community oilseeds support scheme, together with the CommissionŐs replies C 254/1 (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) (2002/C 254/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................. 
22.10.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning I (Meddelanden) REVISIONSRTTEN SRSKILD RAPPORT nr 6/2002 om granskningen av kommissionens frvaltning av EU:s stdsystem fr oljevxtfrn samt kommissionens svar C 254/1 (i enlighet med artikel 248.4 andra stycket i EG-frdraget) (2002/C 254/01) INNEHLLSF RTECKNING SAMMANFATTNING .........................................................
The1991reform .......................................................... TheBlairHouseAgreement.................................................. 
VRLDS-OCH GEMENSKAPSMARKNADEN F R OLJEVXTFR N OCH PRODUKTER AV OLJEVXTFR N............................................................ . HISTORISK UTVECKLING AV DEN GEMENSAMMA ORGANISATIONEN AV MARKNADEN F ROLJEVXTFR N........................................................ .
OBSERVATIONS REGARDING THE CMO FOR OILSEEDS FROM 1992/93 UNTIL 1999/2000 Absence of clear and quantified objectives and late evaluation of the support scheme . . . . . 
Den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr oljevxtfrn och GATT . . . . . . . . . . .
Theobligationtosetasidearableland.......................................... 
1991 rs reform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adifficultsystemtocontrol ................................................. 
Blair House-avtalet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shortcomingsinthemanagementbythecommission ............................. 
Ettsystemmedomfattandesanktioner .........................................
ShortcomingsinthemanagementbytheMemberStates ........................... 
Bristerimedlemsstaternasfrvaltning .........................................
Paragraph I-VII 1-2 3-6 7-16 7-8 9-10 11-12 13-16 17-33 18-20 21-24 25 26-28 29-33 34-47 34-35 36-38 39-40 41-42 43-47 Page 3 4 5 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 12 
Punkt IĐVII 1Đ2 3Đ6 7Đ16 7Đ8 9Đ10 11Đ12 13Đ16 17Đ33 18Đ20 21Đ24 25 26Đ28 29Đ33 34Đ47 34Đ35 36Đ38 39Đ40 41Đ42 43Đ47 Sida 3 4 5 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 9 10 10 10 11 11 11 12
C 254/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22.10.2002 Paragraph Page CONCLUSIONANDRECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 
C 254/2 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 22.10.2002 SLUTSATSEROCHREKOMMENDATIONER .......................................
48-60 12 Conclusionconcerningthedesignofthemeasure ................................ 
Avsaknadavkvantifierademl.............................................
48 12 UnequaltreatmentoffarmersindifferentMemberStates ........................ 
Olikabehandlingavjordbrukareiolikamedlemsstater..........................
51-52 13 Commission annual calculations led to additional budgetary expenditure . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Slutsatseromtgrdensgenomfrande .........................................
53 13 Regionalisationplanscontainingoverstatedyields.............................. 
Utgiftersomintekanterkrvas ...........................................
54-55 13 Irrecoverableexpenditure ................................................. 56 13 High potential penalties and shortcomings in the implementation of the industrial set-asideschemeintheMemberStates ......................................... 
Rekommendationer ........................................................ Tabell 1 Đ Arealer inom gemenskapen som anvnds fr produktion av oljevxtfrn . . . . . . . . . Tabell2ĐEU:ssjlvfrsrjningsgrad..............................................
57-59 13 Recommendations......................................................... 
Kommissionenssvar ........................................................
17 22.10.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 254/3 SUMMARY I. The Court examined the management of the common market organisation (CMO) applicable to the main oilseeds, i.e. colza, sunflower and soya, and the implementation of the system for oilseeds produced on set-aside land. 
17 22.10.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 254/3 SAMMANFATTNING I. Revisionsrtten har granskat frvaltningen av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr de viktigaste slagen av oljevxtfr, framfr allt raps, solros och soja, samt genomfrandet av stdsystemet fr oljevxter som producerats p mark i trda.
During the period 1993 to 1999, annual budgetary expenditure on oilseeds was around 2 400 million euro, or approximately 15 % of Community expenditure on arable crops. 
Under perioden 1993Đ1999 uppgick de rliga budgetutgifterna fr oljevxter till ungefr 2,4 miljarder euro eller ungefr 15 % av gemenskapens utgifter fr jordbruksgrdor.
Community output (13,5 million tonnes in 2000) represents only 5 % of world production, the United States being the worldŐs main producer. 
Produktionen inom gemenskapen (13,5 miljoner ton r 2000) utgr 5 % av vrldsproduktionen, och Frenta staterna r vrldens strsta producent.
Until 1991 the CMO provided for production aid which was paid to the industry for crushing Community seed, with a view to ensuring that Community oilseed prices remained higher than the world market prices. 
Fram till 1991 fanns det inom den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden ett produktionsstd som betalades till industrin fr pressning av oljefrn inom gemenskapen fr att priset p gemenskapens oljevxtfrn skulle ligga ver vrldsmarknadspriset.
In 1991, the Community carried out a radical reform of the CMO and replaced production aid by area-based aid paid directly to the oilseed producers. 
Under 1991 genomfrde gemenskapen en grundlig reform av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden och ersatte produktionsstdet med ett arealstd som betalades direkt till frproducenterna.
V. The Agenda 2000 reform has once again substantially amended the oilseed CMO. 
V. Genom Agenda 2000-reformen ndrades terigen den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr oljevxter betydligt.
After a transitional period oilseeds will receive the same level of aid as cereals and set-aside areas, with effect from the financial year 2002/03. 
Efter en vergngsperiod skall oljevxtfrn frn och med budgetret 2002Đ2003 f samma stdniv som spannml och areal som tagits ur produktion.