natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Paradoxically, although the Commission undertook to present directives containing the arrangements for compensating farmers in the Member States, it considers that it is not legally competent to do so. 
Paradoxalt nog, med tanke p att kommissionen tagit sig att lgga fram direktiv om systemet fr ersttning till uppfdare i medlemsstaterna, anser den sig inte ha juridisk behrighet att gra detta.
The regulations are incomplete as a consequence, in as far as the Commission has not presented the directives. 
Fljden har blivit att regelverket frblivit ofullstndigt genom att kommissionen inte har lagt fram dessa direktiv.
On the basis of the current legal arrangements the Commission confines itself to determining whether Member StatesŐ expenditure is eligible for Community reimbursement, without providing the framework for their calculation of the compensation to be paid to their farmers. 
P grundval av den nuvarande rttsliga ramen begrnsar sig kommissionen till att faststlla om medlemsstaternas utgifter berttigar ersttning frn gemenskapen, utan att ge riktlinjer fr medlemsstaternas berkning av ersttningen som skall betalas till deras uppfdare.
On the other hand, in the context of compulsory slaughter of cattle affected by BSE (70), the Commission set limits on the amount of compensation to be paid to farmers by the Member States (71). 
Vid den obligatoriska slakten av ntkreatur som drabbats av bovin spongiform encefalopati (70) dremot, begrnsade kommissionen beloppen som medlemsstaterna skulle betala till sina uppfdare (71).
The latter are authorised to pay the objective current market value for each animal, established on the basis of a system of objective individual evaluation approved by them. Even if this system does not entirely meet the wish for a harmonised, fair and economic compensation system, it is still preferable to (68) Council Decision 90/424/EEC, Articles 3 and 11(2). 
De har tilltelse att betala ut det rdande objektiva marknadsvrdet fr varje djur, vilket faststlls p grundval av ett system fr enskild och objektiv utvrdering, som de skall ha (68) Beslut 90/424/EEG, artikel 3 och artikel 11.2.
(69) Council Decision 2001/12/EC of 19 December 2000 amending Decision 90/424/EEC on expenditure in the veterinary field (OJ L 3, 6.1.2001, p. 
(69) Rdets beslut 2001/12/EG av den 19 december 2000 om ndring av rdets beslut 90/424/EEG om utgifter inom veterinromrdet (EGT L 3, 6.1.2001, s.
(70) In the case of BSE the compensation payments to farmers for compulsory slaughter of cattle are still managed by the Directorate-General for Agriculture. 
(70) Nr det gller bovin spongiform encefalopati frvaltas den kompensation som skall betalas till uppfdare fr den obligatoriska slakten av deras djur fortfarande av Generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk.
The division of responsibilities for animal disease management between the Directorate General for Health and Consumer Protection and the Directorate General for Agriculture is due to historical reasons. Transferring the compulsory selective slaughter programmes from ÔGuarantee Ń marketsŐ to ÔGuarantee Ń veterinaryŐ has been mentioned, but the associated manpower problems within the Commission have yet to be resolved. 
Uppdelningen av befogenheter mellan Generaldirektoratet fr hlsa och konsumentskydd och Generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk nr det gller frvaltning av djursjukdomar har historiska orsaker. verfring av programmen fr obligatorisk slakt frn ÓmarknadsgarantierÓ till ÓveterinrgarantierÓ har diskuterats men orsakar personalproblem vid kommissionen som nnu inte har lsts.
(71) Commission Regulation (EC) No 164/97 (OJ L 29, 8.1.1997, p. 
(71) Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 164/97 (EGT L 29, 8.1.1997, s.
It was in fact the absence of any framework for compensation that made possible the inconsistencies and inequalities of treatment meted out to farmers according to their geographical location and/or the slaughter method chosen, as described below. 
Att det saknats ram fr ersttningarna har inneburit att uppfdarna behandlats p ett inkonsekvent och ojmlikt stt beroende p deras geografiska placering och/eller vilken slaktmetod som valts, vilket beskrivs nedan.
Variations in compensation systems and lack of uniformity in valuations 62. The compensation for direct losses by farmers, i.e. the gross value of slaughtered livestock, was not set in advance (except in the Netherlands). This meant that Member States had to set it during the crisis, when some price references were unavailable because markets were closed. 
Olika ersttningssystem och oenhetliga utvrderingar 62. Kompensationen fr uppfdarnas direkta frluster, det vill sga bruttovrdet av deras slaktade djur, hade inte faststllts p frhand (utom i Nederlnderna) vilket gjorde att medlemsstaterna mste gra detta under krisen nr vissa prisreferenser inte var tillgngliga p grund av att marknaderna var stngda.
Most Member States drew up price grids for use as a reference by the official valuers responsible for valuing animals, but without instructing that the figures were upper limits. 
De flesta medlemsstater hade faststllt prislistor som skulle anvndas som referens av de auktoriserade utvrderarna som hade till uppgift att vrdera djuren, men det angavs inte att det handlade om takvr-den.
Price references were unavailable for some categories of animals. 
Fr vissa djurkategorier saknades prisreferenser.
As regards indirect losses (72) there was no compensation in three Member States (Ireland, Netherlands, United Kingdom), leaving farmers without resources for at least three weeks after animals had been slaughtered, while the farm was being decontaminated. 
Nr det gller jordbruksfretagens frluster (72) ersatte tre medlemsstater (Irland, Nederlnderna och Frenade kungariket) inte dessa, vilket lmnade jordbrukarna utan tillgngar under minst tre veckor efter det att djuren slaktats och deras anlggning totalsanerats.
In France, on the other hand, the losses were reimbursed to farmers by the French authorities, who considered that the expression Ôadequate compensationŐ for farmers ought to cover all losses (animals and income). 
I Frankrike ersatte de franska myndigheterna dremot uppfdarna fr detta eftersom man ansg att Ósklig kom-pensationÓ till uppfdarna borde tcka hela frlusten (djur och inkomster).
The contracts concluded by Member States with valuers varied and the instructions for valuers were inadequate in some cases. 
Kontrakten som medlemsstaterna ingick med utvrderarna varierade och instruktionerna till utvrderarna var i vissa fall otillrckliga.
In the absence of instructions from the Commission to Member States about cattle valuations, the bovine identification (72) Farmers were not permitted to restock farms for three weeks after animals had been culled and premises decontaminated. During that period they had no income. 
Eftersom det saknades instruktioner frn kommissionen till medlemsstaterna om vrderingen av ntkreatur (72) Nr djuren har slaktats och under tre veckor efter det att anlggningen har totalsanerats har uppfdarna inte rtt att brja teruppbygga djurstocken i sitt jordbruksfretag. Under denna tid saknar de inkomst.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/19 system (73), which contains important data relating to the value of animals (breed, age, sex), was not used by valuers to determine cattle values, leaving them a good deal of latitude. 
3.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 54/19 anvnde inte utvrderarna systemet fr registrering och identifiering av ntkreatur (73), som innehller viktiga uppgifter om djurets vrde (ras, lder och kn), nr de faststllde vrdet av ntkreatur, vilket gav stort utrymme fr uppskattning.
The identity of cattle was not included in the valuation forms and there was no trace of valuations having been reviewed by senior valuers or by the ministry. 
Identifieringen av ntkreaturen redovisades inte i vrderingsblanketterna och ingenting visade att vrderingarna hade granskats av verordnade vrderingsmn eller av ministeriet.
The systems adopted by Member States are described in Box 5. 
De system som infrts av medlemsstaterna redovisas i ruta 5.
Box 5 Compensation systems introduced by Member States The compensation system chosen by the United Kingdom, Ireland and the Netherlands was based on the value of the animals, excluding indirect losses, whereas France included the latter, thus supplementing the animal value by around 30 %. 
Ruta 5 Ersttningssystem som infrts av medlemsstaterna Frenade kungariket, Irland och Nederlnderna valde ett ersttningssystem som utgr frn vrdet p djuren och utesluter jordbruksfretagens frluster, medan Frankrike rknade in dessa vilket motsvarar ett tillgg i storleksordningen 30 % p djurens vrde.
In the United Kingdom the system fluctuated between one where valuers alone assessed the value of the animals and a mixed system where farmers could opt for either a valuation based on a standard rate card or a value set by the valuers. 
I Frenade kungariket varierade systemet mellan en vrdering av djurens vrde som endast gjordes av vrderingsmn, och ett blandat system dr jordbrukarna kunde vlja mellan antingen vrdering enligt en prislista eller av en vrderingsman.
Valuers were not given precise guidelines, and instructions on including outstanding animal premiums in the compensation figure were imprecise, leading to variations in the practices followed. 
Vrderingsmnnen hade inte ftt detaljerade riktlinjer och anvisningarna var oklara betrffande huruvida djurbidrag som nnu inte hade betalats ut skulle inrknas i ersttningen, vilket gav upphov till olika praxis.
In Ireland the responsible authority produced a monthly list of precise prices for all categories of cattle. 
I Irland tog den behriga myndigheten varje mnad fram en lista med exakta priser fr alla kategorier ntboskap.
In the case of sheep, on the other hand, the price grid established by the responsible authority was incomplete and provided no upper limits. In the Netherlands the reference price grid was set in advance by the responsible authority and the valuation procedures to be followed had already been laid down in the contingency plan. 
Nr det gller fr var den behriga myndighetens prislista emellertid ofullstndig och innehll inget tak. I Nederlnderna hade referensprislistan faststllts i frvg av den behriga myndigheten och de utvrderingsfrfaranden som skulle fljas fanns redan angivna i beredskapsplanen, vilket bidrog till att utvrderingarna av djurens vrde blev noggrannare och mer enhetliga.
In France a flat-rate scale had been set for sheep, but for other categories of animal the inadequacy of the national framework allowed prefectures to opt for various systems. 
I Frankrike hade man faststllt en schablontaxa fr fr, men fr vriga djurkategorier gjorde den otillrckliga nationella rttsliga ramen att prefekturerna kunde vlja olika system.
(73) The cattle registration and identification system comprises ear tags and passports identifying cattle individually, individual registers kept on every farm, and computer databases set up by the Member States. 
(73) Systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur omfattar ronmrken och pass fr att identifiera varje enskilt ntkreatur, enskilda register som frs vid varje jordbruksfretag och databaser som upprttats av medlemsstaterna.
Despite the weaknesses detected in the application of the system (see Special Report No 6/2004 on the cattle identification and registration system), it would have been possible for lists of cattle present on farms to be printed and used by vets and valuers to verify animalsŐ history, slaughter them and establish their value. 
Trots de brister som upptckts i tillmpningen av systemet (se srskild rapport nr 6/2004 om systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur) skulle man ha kunnat skriva ut register ver vilka ntkreatur som fanns p jordbruksfretagen s att veterinrer och vrderingsmn kunnat anvnda dem vid kontrollen av antalet djur, vid slakten av dem och fr berkningen av deras vrde.
In the United Kingdom the NAO, like the Commission and the Court, detected animal values that were higher than the values at the beginning of the crisis. 
Hga vrderingar av djurens vrde i frhllande till deras vrde i brjan av krisen har upptckts i Frenade kungariket av det nationella revisionsorganet liksom av kommissionen och revisionsrtten.
Additional payments totalling 4,2 million euro relative to the initial valuation of the animals were granted to some farmers (France, Ireland, United Kingdom). 
Tillgg p sammanlagt 4,2 miljoner euro i frhllande till den ursprungliga vrderingen av deras djur har beviljats vissa uppfdare (Frankrike, Irland, Frenade kungariket).
In other cases the compensation was reduced (Netherlands). 
I andra fall har ersttningarna minskats (Nederlnderna).
The average compensation paid to farmers was noticeably higher in the United Kingdom for cattle and sheep than in the other Member States, while in France it was higher for pigs (see Box 6 and Diagram 3). 
De genomsnittliga ersttningar som utbetalades till uppfdare fr ntkreatur och fr var betydligt hgre i Frenade kungariket n i andra medlemsstater, medan de var hgst fr svin i Frankrike (se ruta 6 och diagram 3).
Box 6 Compensation paid by Member States In the United Kingdom the compensation paid was high: the National Audit Office reported that the standard rate card used to value animals during part of the crisis was based on the highest prices prevailing just before the crisis. 
Ruta 6 Ersttningar som medlemsstaterna betalat ut I Frenade kungariket var de utbetalade ersttningarna hga: Det nationella revisionsorganet (National Audit Office) har konstaterat att standardprislistan som anvndes under en del av krisen fr att utvrdera djur, utgick frn de hgsta priserna som rdde precis fre krisen.
The Commission has calculated that the average compensation paid for cattle was more than twice their value, more than 2,5 times value for sheep and almost twice value for pigs, resulting in an over-valuation (811,7 million euro) of the amount declared by the responsible authority. 
Kommissionen har berknat att i genomsnitt kompenserades ntkreatur med mer n sitt dubbla vrde, fr med mer n tv och en halv gng och svin med nstan dubbla sitt vrde, vilket sammantaget ger en vervrdering p 811,7 miljoner euro i det belopp som deklarerades av den behriga myndigheten.
In the case of France the Commission estimated that 1,1 million euro of the amount declared was attributable to the over-valuation of animals, mainly because the compensation included indirect losses and the valuations for pigs were too high. 
Fr Frankrikes del har kommissionen berknat att vervrderingen av djur, som frmst beror p att jordbruksfretagens frluster rknades in i kompensationen och p det alltfr hga vrde som sattes svin, uppgick till 1,1 miljoner euro av det deklarerade beloppet.
In Ireland and the United Kingdom additional amounts (0,5 million euro and 1,7 million euro respectively) were paid to farmers who disputed valuations, but the amount of compensation paid was not cut in cases where the responsible authority found the valuation too high. 
Tillgg i Irland (0,5 miljoner euro) och Frenade kungariket (1,7 miljoner euro) betalades till uppfdare som hade verklagat, men utan att vrderingarna, som av den behriga myndigheten bedmdes som mycket hga, ledde till att de utbetalade ersttningarna snktes.
In France the flat-rate scale for sheep was revised upwards, adding almost two million euro to the compensation for destroying carcasses. 
I Frankrike hjdes schablontaxan fr fr, vilket, tillsammans med ersttning fr destruering av djurkroppar, innebar ett tillgg p nstan 2 miljoner euro.
In the Netherlands the ministry decided to reduce the compensation for infected animals by 50 % of their value. 
I Nederlnderna beslutade ministeriet att minska ersttningen fr smittade djur med 50 % av deras vrde.
As a consequence farmers received 50 % of the value of infected animals and 100 % of the value of other animals, all on the same farm. 
Fljden blev att en uppfdare fick 50 % av vrdet fr sina smittade djur och 100 % av vrdet fr sina andra djur p samma grd.
C 54/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union Diagram 3 Average compensation paid per head for different categories of animals slaughtered in 2001 3.3.2005 Exchange rate: 1 euro = 0,62380 pound sterling (on 3 December 2001) Source: FR/ Claims for reimbursement (5 October 2001 and 6 December 2002). 
En prislista hade faststllts i frvg och anvndes som vgledning vid vrderingen. C 54/20 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning Diagram 3 Genomsnittlig ersttning per djur fr olika slaktade djurkategorier som betalades ut 2001 3.3.2005 Vxelkurs: 1 euro = 0,62380 pund sterling (den 3 december 2001).
IRL/ Claim for reimbursement (6 February 2002). 
IRL/begran om ersttning (6.2.2002).
NL/ Claim for reimbursement (April 2002). 
NL/begran om ersttning (april 2002).
UK/ Claims for reimbursement (December 2001 and 26 February 2003) plus Northern Ireland claim for reimbursement. 
UK/begran om ersttning (december 2001 och 26.2.2003) och begran om ersttning fr Nordirland.
Established cases of double payments of animal premiums 67. 
Konstaterade fall av dubbla betalningar av djurbidrag 67.
Five months after the start of the FMD crisis, when Member States had already begun to award compensation, the Commission drew up a regulation of derogation (74) concerning Member StatesŐ payment of the Community per capita animal and slaughter premiums under market support measures (75). 
Fem mnader efter det att mul-och klvsjukekrisen startat, och nr medlemsstaterna redan hade brjat bevilja kompensationer, utarbetade kommissionen undantagsbestmmelser (74) fr medlemsstaternas utbetalningar av gemenskapsbidrag fr djur och slaktbidrag per djur (75) som marknadsstdjande tgrder.
The Regulation authorised Member States to pay the premiums to farmers, in addition to the FMD compensation, without their having to comply with the conditions governing retention of animals on the farm which are necessary for control purposes under normal circumstances (identification and counting of the animals). 
Genom denna lagstiftning kunde medlemsstaterna betala dessa bidrag till uppfdarna, utver kompensationerna fr mul-och klvsjuka, utan att uppfdarna behvde iaktta villkoren om att hlla kvar djuren p sitt jordbruksfretag vilket normalt krvs fr kontroll (identifiering och rkning av djuren).
(74) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1458/2001 (OJ L 194,18.7.2001, p. 
(74) Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 1458/2001 (EGT L 194, 18.7.2001, s.
4). This Regulation was drawn up by the Directorate-General for Agriculture. 
4). Denna frordning utarbetades av Generaldirektorat fr jordbruk.
(75) The regulations on animal premiums (Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 
(75) Lagstiftningen om djurbidrag (rdets frordning (EG) nr 1254/1999 (EGT L 160, 26.6.1999, s.
21) and the Commission implementing Regulation (EC) No 2342/1999 (OJ L 281, 4.11.1999, p. 
21) och kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 2342/1999 om tillmpningsfreskrifter fr ntktt (EGT L 281, 4.11.1999, s.
30) for cattle and Council Regulation (EC) No 2467/98 (OJ L 312, 20.11.1998, p. 
30) och rdets frordning (EG) nr 2467/98 om till-lmpningsfreskrifter fr frktt (EGT L 312, 20.11.1998, s.
1) for sheep), which are market support measures, were drafted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture and administered by them. 
1)) gller marknadsstdjande tgrder och utarbetas och frvaltas av Generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk.
However, when it drafted the derogation Regulation the Commission did not take into account the selling practices that normally apply, particularly in Ireland and the United Kingdom, whereby the sale price of animals includes the amount of any animal premiums still outstanding from which the next buyer might benefit. 
Nr dessa undantagsbestmmelser utarbetades tog kommissionen emellertid inte hnsyn till den frsljningspraxis som normalt gllde, srskilt i Irland och Frenade kungariket, och som innebar att man i djurens frsljningspris inkluderar nnu ej utbetalda djurbidrag som kparen vertar rtten till.
In actual fact, valuers in Ireland and the United Kingdom followed the usual practice and, taking the view that adequate compensation for farmers ought to include any premiums still due to the farmers, they included them in the livestock valuations for FMD compensation purposes. 
I enlighet med sin vanliga frsljningspraxis, och eftersom de ansg att Ósklig kom-pensationÓ till uppfdarna skulle inbegripa nnu ej utbetalade bidrag till uppfdarna, inkluderade utvrderarna i Irland och Frenade kungariket dessa vid den vrdering av djuren som utfrdes fr kompensationen fr mul-och klvsjuka.
The Commission, however, omitted to take this practice into consideration and did not instruct Member States to refrain from paying animal premiums subsequently if they had already been included in the FMD compensation. 
Kommissionen underlt emellertid att beakta detta och frbjd inte medlemsstaterna att fortstta betala ut djurbidrag nr dessa redan hade inkluderats i kompensationen fr mul-och klvsjuka.
Given that Ireland and the United Kingdom had already included the amount of some of these premiums in the FMD compensation previously paid to farmers, this meant that some farmers were able to collect the amount of premium twice. 
Eftersom Irland och Frenade kungariket redan hade inkluderat beloppen fr vissa av dessa bidrag i kompensationen fr mul-och klvsjuka som tidigare betalats till uppfdarna, innebar detta att ngra uppfdare fick bidraget tv gnger.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/21 70. 
3.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 54/21 70.
In practice the animal valuation forms only gave an overall amount, without distinguishing between the premiums and the intrinsic value of the animals, so that it was difficult for an auditor to set a precise figure on the extent of double payments. 
Eftersom vrderingsformulren endast angav ett samlat belopp utan att avskilja bidragen frn djurets inneboende vrde, r det i praktiken svrt fr kontrollanter att exakt vrdera omfattningen av dubbla betalningar.
However, given that valuers had been instructed to include the amount of the premiums in the livestock valuations and that some of them had given direct confirmation of the inclusion, the Court was able to estimate that the total for animal premiums (76) paid to the United Kingdom in duplication of those included in the FMD compensation could be of the order of 10 million pounds sterling (more than 16 million euro) (77). 
Men, med utgngspunkt frn det faktum att utvrderarna hade instruerats att inkludera djurbidraget i vrderingen av djuren, och att detta frfarande utan omsvep har bekrftats av ngra av dem, berknar revisionsrtten att de djurbidrag (76) som betalats till Frenade kungariket och som dubblerar de bidrag som ingick i kompensationen fr mul-och klvsjuka, skulle kunna uppg till 10 miljoner pund sterling (ver 16 miljoner euro) (77).
In Ireland as well, the Court identified cattle premiums that had been paid in addition to compensation, but the amounts were smaller (78). 
Revisionsrtten har kunnat konstatera att det ocks i Irland har utbetalats ntboskapsbidrag som komplement till kompensationerna, men med mindre betydande belopp (78).
In France some prefectures included bovine premiums in the compensation, others did not. 
I Frankrike inkluderade vissa prefekturer ntboskapsbidragen i kompensationerna, medan andra inte gjorde det.
The agriculture ministry in the Netherlands, on the other hand, told the Court that it had not included any premiums in the FMD compensation. 
Dremot meddelade jordbruksministeriet i Nederlnderna revisionsrtten att man inte hade inkluderat ngot bidrag i kompensationerna fr mul-och klvsjuka.
Variations in slaughter premium payments 72. 
Oenhetliga utbetalningar av slaktbidrag 72.