natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There is a mismatch between what is stated in the assessment and what is found in the accompanying table. 
Det som sgs i bedmningen stmmer inte verens med vad som str i den tfljande tabellen.
For example, the text states that Ôin broad terms unit costs were lower for the unemployed and young unemployed, around 6 000 euro per worker in employment, and considerably higher and wide-ranging for those with disabilities and long-term unemployedŐ (2). Yet the table gives the unit costs for training the unemployed as the highest (at 6 000 euro) and the integration of the disabled as one of the lowest (at 4 000 euro). 
Till exempel str det i texten att enhetskostnaden generellt sett var lgre fr de arbetslsa och unga arbetslsa, omkring 6 000 euro per arbetstagare i sysselsttning, och betydligt hgre och mer varierande fr dem med nedsatt arbetsfrmga och lngtidsarbetslsa (2). nd framgr det av tabellen att enhetskostnaden fr fortbildning av arbetslsa r den hgsta (p 6 000 euro) och att integreringen av personer med nedsatt arbetsfrmga en av de lgsta (p 4 000 euro).
Furthermore, it is common practice to give the range of variation when there is what is claimed to be Ôwide variationŐ between and within programmes. 
Dessutom r det brukligt att ge varia-tionsspannet nr det rder vad som bedms vara en Óstor varia-tionÓ mellan och inom olika program.
The analysis in this section is of limited value because it relies overly on reducing the assessment to a single number rather than defining a relevant range of values and providing a more comprehensive analysis of these ranges found in the various cases examined. 
Analysen i detta avsnitt har begrnsat vrde eftersom den i alltfr hg grad begrnsar bedmningen till en enstaka siffra snarare n att definiera spektrum av olika relevanta vrden och ge en mer uttmmande analys av de spektrum av vrden som ptrffats i de olika granskade exemplen.
This mismatch between the commentary and the figures given occurs in other parts of Chapter 3 (see Text box 3 for some examples). 
Sdan brist p verensstmmelse mellan kommentaren och sifferuppgifterna frekommer p andra stllen i kapitel 3 (se fler exempel i textruta 3).
Text box 3 For instance, it is stated that: ÔThe ESF per capita expenditure was highest in Ireland, Portugal and Greece (fully Objective 1 countries) and in Spain (1)Ő. 
Textruta 3 Till exempel faststlls det att ESF-utgiften per capita var hgst i Irland, Portugal och Grekland (lnder som helt omfattas av ml 1) och i Spanien (1). nd str det i tabell 3.1 att ESF-utgiften per capita per r fr Portugal r 2 086 euro och fr Tyskland 405 euro, medan uppgifterna fr Irland r 12 euro och fr Grekland 17 euro.
Yet in Table 3.1, Greece is classified as having no ESF expenditure in the relevant column giving ESF expenditure on education relative to national expenditure. For example in paragraph 3.2.3 (3) it is stated that: ÔThe national expenditure on labour market training as a proportion of GDP ranged from 0,2 % in Luxembourg to 0,58 % in Sweden (4)Ő. 
Till exempel str det i punkt 3.2.3 (3) att de nationella utgifterna fr arbetsmarknadsutbildning i procent av BNP varierade frn 0,2 % i Luxemburg till 0,58 % i Sverige (4). nd framgr det av tabell 3.3 att utgifterna fr fortbildning i Danmark r 0,94 % av BNP, nstan dubbelt s mycket som fr Sverige.
As another example, consider paragraph 3.2.6 (5), dealing with expenditure on the integration of the disabled. 
Ett annat exempel finns i punkt 3.2.6 (5), som handlar om utgifter fr integrering av personer med nedsatt arbetsfrmga.
In the text, one finds the following statement: ÔThe ESF was particularly important in Portugal, Spain, Greece and Austria.Ő Yet in Table 3.6, Spain and Greece are listed as having no ESF expenditure on the disabled. 
I texten str det att ESF var synnerligen viktigt i Portugal, Spanien, Grekland och sterrike. Enligt tabell 3.6 har dock Spanien och Grekland inga ESF-utgifter fr personer med nedsatt arbetsfrmga.
A further example is found in paragraph 3.2.7 dealing with expenditure on education. 
Ytterligare ett exempel finns i punkt 3.2.7 som handlar om utgifter fr utbildning.
It is stated that: ÔThe ESF contribution was most significant in Greece, Ireland and Portugal (6)Ő. 
Det str att ESF-bidragen var strst i Grekland, Irland och Portugal (6).
But Greece is listed in Table 3.7 as having no ESF expenditure on education and training. 
Men av tabell 3.7 framgr att Grekland inte har ngra ESF-utgifter fr utbildning och fortbildning.
Synthesis Report: (1) p. 
Sammanfattande rapport: (1) s.
12.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 302/19 Assessing the impact of ESF operations 88. 
125. 12.12.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 302/19 Bedmning av ESF-insatsernas effekt 88.
The evaluators who took part in the study were asked to indicate whether the cases assessed provided support for or contradicted a number of hypotheses that had been formulated on the basis of an initial review of the literature and the findings of the inception phase of the evaluation. 
De utvrderare som deltog i utvrderingen ombads ange om de bedmda fallen gav std fr eller motsade ett antal hypoteser som hade uppstllts p grundval av en tidigare granskning av dokument och resultaten av den inledande fasen av utvrderingen.
The study claims Ôstrong Table 3 supporting evidence for four hypothesesŐ (see Table 3 (1)). 
Enligt utvrderingen finns starka belgg fr fyra hypoteser (se tabell 3 (1)).
However, the data presented does not support the claim of strong supporting evidence. 
De uppgifter som lggs fram uppfyller dock inte kravet p starka belgg.
For example, only seven of the 30 evaluators said there was Ôstrong supporting evidenceŐ for the first hypothesis. 
Till exempel sade endast 7 av de 30 utvrderarna att det fanns starka belgg fr den frsta hypo-tesen.
A more objective evaluation of these results would have been warranted. 
En mer objektiv utvrdering av dessa resultat skulle ha behvts.
Observations on the hypotheses addressed in the examination of cases of impact on individuals 1. related to the underlying national and regional market conditions (e.g. results depend upon the economic cycle and level of demand and unemployment). 2. 
Nivn av den uppndda effekten r relaterad till de underliggande nationella och regionala marknadsvillkoren (t.ex. r resultaten beroende av den ekonomiska cykeln och nivn av efterfrgan och arbetslshet). 2.
The level of impact is related to the characteristics of the beneficiary groups targeted. (e.g. training measures are more effective for women re-entering the labour market and educated immigrants than for low-skilled workers and youth). 
Nivn av effekten r relaterad till karakteristiken p de mottagargrupper man riktar sig till (t.ex. r fortbildnings-tgrder mer effektiva fr kvinnor som ter kommer in p arbetsmarknaden och fr utbildade invandrare n fr lg-utbildade arbetstagare och ungdomar).
The level of impact is related to the type of measure. 
Nivn av effekten r relaterad till typen av tgrd.
Some measures show high levels of deadweight and some are effective at a small scale but do not provide general solutions. 
Vissa tgrder visar hga niver av ddviktseffekter och vissa r ndamlsenliga i liten skala men ger inte ngra allmnna lsningar.
The level of impact is closely related to aspects of the structure and management of programmes including the quality of analyses that define the precise scope of interventions. (e.g, small targeted programmes may be more effective than large-scale programmes). 
Nivn av effekten r ttt knuten till struktur och frvaltningen av programmen, inbegripet kvaliteten p analyserna som definierar den exakta omfattningen av stdtgrderna (t.ex. kan sm mlinriktade program vara mer ndamlsenliga n storskaliga program).
Strong Some supporting supporting evidence evidence 7 14 8 18 5 17 No Some Strong evidence to evidence evidence support to to or contradict contradict contradict 8 0 1 3 0 0 6 1 0 No opinion at this stage 0 1 1 The level of impact achieved is 3 17 7 1 0 1 (1) Table 3 reproduces part of Table 4.8 in the Synthesis Report. 
7 14 8 0 1 0 8 18 3 5 17 6 3 17 7 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 (1) I tabell 3 tas delvis samma uppgifter upp som i tabell 4.8 i den sammanfattande rapporten.
C 302/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2006 Evaluation of equal opportunities 89. 
C 302/20 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 12.12.2006 Utvrdering av lika mjligheter 89.
This aspect is tackled in Chapter 7 of the report. 
Denna aspekt behandlas i kapitel 7 i rapporten.
However, it is claimed that: ÔA major finding is that gender disaggregated data were not collected systematically for each of the ESF Objectives and Community Initiatives across the EUŐ (2). 
Det hvdas dock att en viktig iakttagelse var att knsuppdelade uppgifter inte samlades in systematiskt fr alla ESF-ml och gemenskapsinitiativ i hela EU (2).
This has limited significantly the ability of the study to evaluate this topic. 
Detta har kraftigt begrnsat utvrderingens mjlighet att utvrdera denna frga.
It is difficult to accept this result as a major finding of this report since a preliminary analysis would have revealed this shortcoming, necessitating field work and sample surveys to overcome this restriction, rather than simply concluding that disaggregated data is not available. 
Det r svrt att betrakta detta resultat som en viktig iakttagelse i rapporten eftersom denna brist borde ha avsljats genom en frhandsanalys som skulle ha pekat p behovet av fltstudier och stickprovsunderskningar fr att bekmpa denna begrnsning, snarare n att endast dra slutsatsen att knsuppdelade uppgifter inte finns tillgngliga.
Other aspects examined 90. 
Andra granskade aspekter 90.
As regards the impact of ESF operations on individuals, the interventions Ôcombined measuresŐ (3) have not been specifically examined in spite of the substantial percentage of ESF resources having been allocated (18 %) to them. 
Nr det gller ESF-aktiviteternas inverkan fr enskilda personer har stdet i form av Ókombinerade tgrderÓ (3) inte granskats specifikt trots att en betydande procentandel ESF-medel (18 %) anslagits till dessa tgrder.
As a result, the conclusions of the Synthesis Report are rather modest: ÔMost of the evaluation work points to positive outcomes. 
Till fljd av detta r slutsatserna i den sammanfattande rapporten ganska modesta. Enligt rapporten pekar det mesta av utvrderingsarbetet p positiva resultat.
However, the evaluation methods tend to focus on identifying the components of the programmes that are most effective rather than judging the performance of combined measures compared with single measure interventionsŐ (4). 
Utvrderingsmetoderna fokuseras dock mest p att identifiera de programkomponenter som r mest ndamlsenliga snarare n att bedma resultatet av kombinerade tgrder jmfrt med std inom en enda tgrd (4).
As regards the impact of Active Labour Market Policies (ALMP), especially with regard to Objective 1 countries, the Synthesis Report draws some conclusions without adequately explaining how they were reached. 
Nr det gller effekten av den aktiva arbetsmarknadspolitiken (ALMP), srskilt i frga om ml 1-lnder, drar man i den sammanfattande rapporten ngra slutsatser utan att p ett tillfredsstllande stt frklara hur man kom fram till dem.
As regards the relative financial contribution of the ESF, the Synthesis Report (5) concludes: Ôthat the combined allocation of national expenditure and ESF resources does not appear to have led to a convergence of the patterns of expenditure between the countries, nor the adoption of norms linking specific economic and labour market conditions to resource allocationsŐ (6). 
Nr det gller ESF:s finansiella bidrag p detta omrde dras i den sammanfattande rapporten (5) slutsatsen att den kombinerade tilldelningen av nationella anslag och ESF-medel inte verkar ha lett till en konvergens av utgiftsmnstren mellan lnderna, och inte heller till antagandet av normer som knyter srskilda ekonomiska villkor och srskilda arbetsmarknadsvillkor till tilldelning av medel (6).
It is difficult to see how this conclusion can be sustained given the level of errors in the relevant tables and/or mistakes in the discussion. 
Det r svrt att se hur denna slutsats kan frsvaras med tanke p mngden fel i tabellerna och/eller i analysen.
Similarly, another important conclusion in this part of the report is that: ÔThese circumstances suggest that not all of the ESF interventions are likely to have been additional. 
En annan viktig slutsats i denna del av rapporten r att dessa omstndigheter antyder att det r troligt att inte alla ESF-stdtgrder har tillfrt ngot enligt additionalitetsprincipen.
Additional-ity, in the sense of the ESF co-financed interventions being unlikely to otherwise have taken place, is more likely to have occurred where ESF resources were focused and concentrated on particular types of interventions and where the related national (1) Here refers primarily to gender equality. 
Sannolikheten fr additionalitet, i den bemrkelsen att de tgrder som medfinansierades genom ESF annars troligen inte skulle (1) Hr refererar man frmst till jmstlldhet mellan knen.
(2) Synthesis Report, p.173. 
(2) Sammanfattande rapport, s. 173.
(3) Combined measures enclose intensive counselling and training, work experience and training and employment incentives and training. 
(3) Kombinerade tgrder inbegriper rdgivning och fortbildning, arbetslivserfarenhet och fortbildning samt stimulanstgrder fr nyanstll-ning och fortbildning.
(4) Synthesis Report, p. 
(4) Sammanfattande rapport, s.
(5) Paragraph 3.2.8. 
(5) Punkt 3.2.8.
(6) Synthesis Report, p. 
(6) Sammanfattande rapport, s.
86. expenditure and programmes were relatively small and less developed compared with countries with similar labour market con-ditions.Ő Here again, it is difficult to see how this conclusion is reached from the evidence presented in this chapter, especially given the mismatch that there is between the analysis and the data given in the tables. 
86. ha gt rum, var strre d ESF-resurserna var fokuserade och koncentrerade p srskilda slags stdtgrder och d de nationella utgifterna och programmen var relativt sm och mindre utvecklade jmfrt med lnder med liknande arbetsmarknadsvillkor. Hr r det terigen svrt att se hur denna slutsats har kunnat dras utifrn det underlag som lggs fram i kapitlet, srskilt med tanke p att analysen och uppgifterna i tabellerna inte stmmer verens.
With regard to the hypotheses advanced on the impact of ESF on systems, a problem arises similar to that described earlier. 
Med avseende p de hypoteser som stllts upp om effekten av ESF p system uppstr ett problem liknande det som beskrivits ovan.
Strong supporting evidence is claimed this time for seven hypotheses (7). 
Den hr gngen pstr man att det finns starka belgg fr sju hypoteser (7).
However, an analysis of the data presented also indicates that the conclusion is not warranted. 
En analys av de framlagda uppgifterna visar dock att slutsatsen inte r motiverad.
Comments on the overall assessment by the Commission 94. 
Kommentarer om kommissionens vergripande bedmning 94.
The evaluation of the report by DG EMPL is based on eight performance criteria and four possible quality levels, namely: excellent, good, acceptable and unacceptable. 
GD Sysselsttning, socialpolitik och lika mjligheters utvrdering baseras p tta utfrandekriterier och fyra mjliga kvalitetsniver, nmligen: utmrkt, god, godtagbar och ej godtagbar.
None of the applied criteria are rated as excellent or unacceptable. 
Inget av de tillmpade kriterierna bedms som utmrkta eller ej godtagbara.
Four criteria are rated as good, namely; meeting needs, relevant scope, defensible design and clear report. 
Fyra kriterier bedms som goda, nmligen: behovs-uppfyllelse, relevant omfattning, lmplig metod och tydlig rapport.
The four other criteria considered are ranked as acceptable. 
De fyra vriga kriterierna som beaktas bedms som godtagbara.
These relate to reliable data, sound analysis, credible results and impartial conclusions. 
Dessa kriterier gller tillfrlitliga uppgifter, vlgrundad analys, trovrdiga resultat och opartiska slutsatser.
It is significant that DG EMPL assessed the latter four criteria as being less satisfactory than the previous four. 
Det r betecknande att GD Sysselsttning, socialpolitik och lika mjligheter bedmde de fyra sistnmnda kriterierna som mindre tillfredsstllande n de frsta fyra.
However given the problems encountered as regards reliabilty of the data and the inconsistencies of the commentary thereon, as highlighted in this report, the Court considers that the evaluation report was unsatisfactory, especially with regard to reliable data, sound analysis, credible results and impartial conclusions. 
Med tanke p de problem som ptrffades i frga om uppgifternas tillfrlitlighet och motsgelserna i frhllande till kommentaren om dessa uppgifter, vilket belyses i denna rapport, anser dock revisionsrtten att utvrderingsrapporten var otillfredsstllande, srskilt nr det gller tillfrlitliga uppgifter, vlgrundad analys, trovrdiga resultat och opartiska slutsatser.
Other insights from the national reports 97. 
Andra kommentarer till de nationella rapporterna 97.
Some pertinent comments can also be made with reference to the national evaluation reports, with regard to the evaluation objectives and results: (a) The evaluation results in relation to the impact on individuals were often of a qualitative nature; deadweight was not always estimated. 
Vissa relevanta kommentarer kan ocks ges avseende de nationella utvrderingsrapporterna nr det gller utvrderingens ml och resultat: a) Utvrderingsresultaten var, nr det gller effekt fr enskilda personer, ofta av kvalitativ natur och ddviktseffekterna hade inte alltid bedmts.
(7) Synthesis Report, p. 
(7) Sammanfattande rapport, s.
12.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 302/21 (b) Impact aspects of a more qualitative nature (1), the so-called soft outcomes, have not been systematically, examined. (c) Except for integrated or mixed approaches, few general statements concerning the performance of individual measures can be deduced from the evaluations. (d) Important factors such as the contribution to sustainable development and to socio-economic cohesion have not been systematically assessed. (e) Target groups such as the long-term unemployed and young people seeking to enter the labour force have not systematically been the subject of specific conclusions in the evaluation of the co-financed measures. (f) Only in a few cases was it possible to compare expectations with results; the evaluation was generally hampered by the lack of specific initial objectives and indicators and the unavailability of accurate information. (g) The complementarity between ESF and other actions has only rarely been taken into consideration in order to explain certain results. 
12.12.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 302/21 b) Kvalitativa aspekter av effekten (1), de s kallade Ómjuka resul-tatenÓ, har inte granskats systematiskt. c) Frutom fr integrerade eller blandade frfaringsstt kan endast f allmnna uttalanden gras om resultatet av enskilda tgrder. d) Viktiga faktorer, till exempel medverkan till hllbar utveckling och till socio-ekonomisk sammanhllning, har inte systematiskt bedmts. e) I utvrderingen av samfinansierade tgrder har det inte dragits ngra specifika slutsatser nr det gller mlgrupper som lngtidsarbetslsa och unga mnniskor som frsker komma in p arbetsmarknaden. f) Endast i ett ftal fall var det mjligt att jmfra frvntningar med resultat; utvrderingen frsvrades i allmnhet av bristen p specifika ursprungliga ml och indikatorer och av bristen p tillgng till korrekt information. g) Komplementariteten mellan ESF och andra insatser har endast sllan tagits i beaktande fr att frklara vissa resultat.
The significance of the productivity increase of individual ESF beneficiaries, in terms of the benefits to the firms employing them, was almost never examined directly. 
Betydelsen av produktivitetskningen hos enskilda ESF-stdmottagare, i form av frdelar fr det fretag som har anstllt dem, granskades nstan aldrig direkt.
The sampled national reports do not always present a thorough analysis of the impact of ESF interventions on national policies. 
De nationella rapporterna i urvalet lgger inte alltid fram en grundlig analys av ESF-stdtgrdernas effekt p den nationella politiken.
However, they generally do suggest that the ESF had an impact on the development of ALMPs and, in some cases, a concrete, direct effect was stated. 
I allmnhet pstr de dock att ESF hade en effekt p utvecklingen av den aktiva arbetsmarknadspolitiken och i vissa fall kunde en konkret, direkt effekt konstateras.
However, in some other instances, a different assessment was made, namely that it is difficult to show that the ESF has led to changes in the ALMPs. 
I vissa andra fall gjordes en annan bedmning, nmligen att det r svrt att visa att ESF har lett till frndringar i den aktiva arbetsmarknadspolitiken.
Each national evaluation report and the Synthesis Report describe in a more or less extended way the impacts on systems as regards employment services; initial education and training; continuing education and training; accreditation systems and mechanisms for anticipating needs. 
Alla de nationella utvrderingsrapporterna och den sammanfattande rapporten beskriver p ett mer eller mindre uttm-ligt stt effekterna p system nr det gller arbetsfrmedling, grundutbildning och yrkesutbildning, vidareutbildning och fortbildning, auktoriseringssystem och mekanismer fr att frekomma behov.
It was generally difficult to identify the net impacts of ESF operations (2); only in exceptional cases, was the net impact effectively delimited (3). 
Det var i allmnhet svrt att identifiera nettoeffekterna av ESF-insatserna (2), endast i undantagsfall var nettoeffekten ndamlsenligt avgrnsad (3).
(1) For example, the achievement of qualifications and the soft outcomes presented in the UK evaluation report (representing Ôdistance travelled toward the labour marketŐ). 
(1) Till exempel erhllande av meriter och de svrkvantifierade resultat (Ómjuka resultatÓ) som lggs fram i Frenade kungarikets utvrderingsrapport (som visar Óhur mycket nrmare arbetsmarknaden personen i frga har kommitÓ).
(2) This was also stated by some evaluators (Spain and Italy). 
(2) Detta konstaterades ocks av ngra utvrderare (Spanien och Italien).
(3) For example, in Spanish cases. 
(3) Till exempel fr fall i Spanien.
Concerning the European Employment Strategy, the evaluation reports highlighted the positive influence of the ESF in some Member States such as Greece, France, Italy, Portugal and Spain. 
Nr det gller den europeiska sysselsttningsstrategin lyfte utvrderingsrapporterna fram det positiva inflytande som ESF har haft i vissa medlemsstater, till exempel Grekland, Frankrike, Italien, Portugal och Spanien.
However, it was noted in the case of Germany that the top-down approach associated with the European Employment Strategy had the potential to conflict with the ESF bottom-up approach (4). 
Det konstaterades dock i Tysklands fall att den Ótop-downÓ-inriktning som frknippas med den europeiska sysselsttningsstrategin kunde st i konflikt med ESF:s Óbottom-upÓ-inriktning (4).
At the more general level, the Synthesis Report concludes that the EES has provided a stronger strategic framework within which to programme ESF interventions (5). 
P en mer allmn niv drar den sammanfattande rapporten slutsatsen att den europeiska sysselsttningsstrategin har gett en starkare strategisk ram inom vilken ESF-stdtgrderna kan planeras (5).