natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The results obtained support the intuitive conclusion that the higher the EU funds provided per capita, the higher is the GDP growth per capita in Member States. 
Resultatet stder den intuitiva slutsatsen att ju hgre EU-medel som ges per capita, desto hgre r BNP-tillvxten per capita i medlemsstaterna.
This result shows that with a broader approach, relevant assessments can be made even with the unnecessarily limited data base used in this important area under consideration. 
Resultatet visar att med ett bredare angreppsstt kan relevanta bedmningar gras ven med den ondigt begrnsade databas som anvndes vid underskningen av denna viktiga frga.
A central part of the assessment in this section of the Synthesis Report is based on a comparison of various categories of planned expenditure in 1994 and the estimated actual expenditure in 1999. 
En central del i bedmningen i detta avsnitt av den sammanfattande rapporten bygger p en jmfrelse mellan olika kategorier av planerade utgifter under 1994 och de uppskattade faktiska utgifterna under 1999.
However, the data presented suffers from a number of serious errors or discrepancies which limits the validity of the conclusions which can be drawn. 
De uppgifter som lggs fram innehller dock ett antal allvarliga fel och differenser vilket begrnsar giltigheten i de slutsatser som kan dras.
In particular, in the case of five Member States, the figure for actual expenditure given under the ÔtotalŐ column (in the relevant table published in the Synthesis Report) is different from the sum of the figures which appear under the individual columns that denote EU, public and private (4) Synthesis Report, Table 2.1, p. 
I synnerhet, nr det gller fem medlemsstater, r sifferuppgifterna fr faktiska utgifter som visas i ÓtotalÓ-kolumnen (i motsvarande tabell i den sammanfattande rapporten) inte samma som summan av de siffror som visas i de enskilda kolumnerna fr EU:s respektive den offentliga (4) Sammanfattande rapport, tabell 2.1, s.
75, Tables 2.5 and 2.6, p. 
75, tabell 2.5 och tabell 2.6, s.
88 and 89. (5) Synthesis Report, p. 75. 
(5) Sammanfattande rapport. s. 75. befolkningen i arbetsfr lder.
12.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 302/9 sector expenditure respectively (as they appear in the very same table). 
12.12.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 302/9 och den privata sektorns utgifter (i samma tabell).
These discrepancies are summarised in Table 1. 
Dessa differenser sammanfattas i tabell 1.
The percentage discrepancy, which is shown in the last column of this table, is significant and implies an inadequate quality control in the formulation of the report content and results. 
Differensen i procent, som visas i den sista kolumnen i denna tabell, r signifikant och tyder p en otillrcklig kvalitetskontroll i formuleringen av rapportens innehll och resultat.
Notwithstanding these discrepancies, transforming the data given on a per capita basis (1) provides some useful observations which in some contexts differ from what was concluded in the Synthesis Report. 
Trots dessa differenser kan man genom att omvandla dessa siffror till uppgifter per capita (1) gra anvndbara iakttagelser som i vissa fall skiljer sig frn slutsatserna i den sammanfattande rapporten.
Table 2 gives the actual per capita expenditure ranked from highest to lowest for each category. 
I tabell 2 visas de faktiska utgifterna per capita i fallande ordning fr varje kategori.
Table 1 Summary of discrepancies noted in paragraph 24 Germany Italy United Kingdom France Austria (1) Million euro. 
Tabell 1 Sammanfattning av differenser nmnda under punkt 24 Tyskland Italien Frenade kungariket Frankrike sterrike (1) Miljoner euro.
Total Actual/capita Sum of columns (1) 41 015 34 804 3 961 3 339 1 116 Published total (1) 48 243 30 547 4 803 4 019 1 040 Table 2 Actual expenditure (1) Difference (1) 7 228 Đ4257 842 680 Đ76 Percentage discrepancy Đ15 14 Đ18 Đ17 7 Private Actual/capita Austria 2 458 Germany 1 299 Netherlands 1 039 Belgium 705 Ireland 570 Portugal 448 Greece 396 France 205 UK 174 Spain na Italy na 377 Austria Netherlands Germany Ireland Greece Portugal Spain Belgium France Italy United Kingdom 3 866 3 438 2 933 2 926 2 716 2 472 1 725 1 587 1 579 1 445 1 407 2 104 EU per capita Ireland 1 653 Greece 1 580 Portugal 1 403 Spain 1 143 Germany 884 Austria 657 Italy 652 France 621 UK 605 Netherlands 578 Belgium 427 1 033 Public Actual/capita Netherlands 1 Austria 1 Greece Ireland Portugal Spain France Belgium UK Germany Italy na 419 States listed in Table 1, the sum of the three columns in this table do not add up to the total column. Average/capita 822 033 739 703 621 582 485 456 381 311 (1) The same data as published in the report has been used in the compilation of Table 2. 
Totalt faktiska utgifter per capita Kolumnsumma (1) 41 015 34 804 3 961 3 339 1 116 Offentliggjord totalsumma (1) 48 243 30 547 4 803 4 019 1 040 Tabell 2 Faktiska utgifter (1) Skillnad (1) 7 228 Đ4257 842 680 Đ76 Differens i procent Đ15 14 Đ18 Đ17 7 Faktiska privata utgifter per capita sterrike 2 458 Tyskland 1 299 Nederlnderna 1 039 Belgien 705 Irland 570 Portugal 448 Grekland 396 Frankrike 205 frenade 174 Kungariket Spanien Ń Italien Ń 377 EU:s utgifter per capita Faktiska offentliga utgifter per capita sterrike Nederlnderna Tyskland Irland Grekland Portugal Spanien Belgien Frankrike Italien Frenade kungariket Genomsnitt per capita 3 866 3 438 2 933 2 926 2 716 2 472 1 725 1 587 1 579 1 445 1 407 2 104 Irland Grekland Portugal Spanien Tyskland sterrike Italien Frankrike frenade Kungariket Nederlnderna Belgien 1 653 Nederlnderna 1 580 sterrike 1 403 Grekland 1 143 Irland 884 Portugal 657 Spanien 652 Frankrike 621 Belgien 1 1 822 033 739 703 621 582 485 456 605f frenade 381f Kungariket 578 Tyskland 311 427 Italien 1 033 Ń 419 (1) Sammauppgiftersomuppgavsidensammanfattanderapportenharanvntsfrsammanstllningenitabell2.Tillfljdavdettakanman se att fr de medlemsstater som rknas upp i tabell 1 r summan av de tre kolumnerna i den hr tabellen inte samma som kolumnen med totalsumman.
As a result, it can be seen that, for the Member (1) Per capita figures, in this context, have been calculated with reference to the whole national population. 
(1) Sifferuppgifterna per capita har i det hr sammanhanget berknats med avseende p hela den nationella befolkningen.
C 302/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2006 26. 
C 302/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 12.12.2006 26.
The table shows that the total actual funds average was 2 104 euro per person. 
Av tabellen framgr att genomsnittet fr de totala faktiska medlen var 2 104 euro per person.
The EU Structural Funds contributed approximately half of this, while three of the four cohesion Member States managed around 50 % more than the average of 1 033 euro per person. 
EU:s strukturfonder bidrog till ungefr hlften av detta, medan tre av de fyra medlemsstater som fr medel frn sammanhllningsfonden mottog omkring 50 % mer n det genomsnittliga stdbeloppet p 1 033 euro per person.
It appears that some Objective 1 regions in Member States, such as Austria, Germany and the Netherlands, have been particularly successful in combining private investment with the Structural Funds, even surpassing, significantly in the case of Austria and Germany, the average contribution from the EU Structural Funds. 
Det verkar som om vissa ml 1-regioner i medlemsstaterna, till exempel sterrike, Tyskland och Nederlnderna, har varit srskilt framgngsrika nr det gller att kombinera privata investeringar med strukturfonderna, och ven har legat ver det genomsnittliga bidraget frn strukturfonderna, i sterrikes och Tysklands fall i vsentlig grad.
However, the factors contributing to a higher participation by the private sector remain unexplored in the report. 
De faktorer som bidrar till en kad medverkan frn den privata sektorn utforskas dock inte i rapporten.
For example, was this a result of the nature of the projects chosen, the skills of the human resources available or indeed a different kind of assistance that is given to the private sector from the funds? 
Var det till exempel ett resultat av de utvalda projektens natur, den tillgngliga personalens kvalifikationer eller av att den privata sektorn i sjlva verket fr ett annat sorts std frn fonderna?
In the CourtŐs view, these aspects merited further examination. 
Enligt revisionsrtten borde dessa aspekter ha underskts vidare.
The assessment of appropriateness was seldom based on formalised techniques(1) and the practices followed by the national evaluators were quite different and were generally largely descriptive. 
Bedmningen av lmplighet grundades sllan p ngon formaliserad metod (1) och de metoder som de nationella utvrderarna anvnde var ganska olika och i allmnhet deskriptiva.
Similarly, the changes in strategy during the programming period have not been examined thoroughly in terms of their appropriateness. 
Strategifr-ndringarna under programperioden har inte heller granskats grundligt i frga om lmplighet.
Evaluation of effectiveness 29. 
Utvrdering av ndamlsenligheten 29.
Specific chapters in the national evaluations and in Chapter 3 of the Synthesis Report tackle the effectiveness of Structural Funds, based on the extent to which expected effects have been obtained and objectives have been achieved. 
I vissa kapitel i de nationella utvrderingarna och i kapitel 3 i den sammanfattande rapporten analyseras strukturfondernas ndamlsenlighet, utifrn i vilken utstrckning de frvntade effekterna och mlen hade uppntts.
Five themes are explored, namely Transport, SMEs, R&D, Education and Training, and Rural Development. 
Fem teman utforskas: transport, sm och medelstora fretag, forskning och utveckling, utbildning och landsbygdsutveckling.
Two horizontal themes dealing with the environment and equal opportunities are also examined. 
Tv sektorsvergripande teman granskas ocks: milj och lika mjligheter.
The analysis is based on a sample of 70 % of the value of Objective 1 programmes. 
Analysen grundas p ett stickprov omfattande 70 % av vrdet p ml 1-programmen.
However, a great deal of emphasis was placed on qualitative appraisals, for example rating community (1) This assessment needs identification and examination within a global framework of the causal links between the needs, the strategic objectives, the objectives of programmes/sub-programmes/measures and the allocation of resources. 
Sdana bedmningar och (1) En sdan bedmning frutstter att man inom en vergripande ram faststller och analyserar orsakssambanden mellan behoven, de strategiska mlen, mlen fr program/delprogram/tgrder och tilldelningen av resurser.
It needs also in principle a ranking of the needs and unsatisfactory socio-economic situations which the CSF aim to address and a hierarchy of inherent factors to be considered in order to ensure that resources are optimally targeted towards meeting needs. added value on a ÔyesŐ or ÔnoŐ basis. Such appraisals and opinions are often classified too broadly and are not always objectively verifiable. 
Det behvs ocks i princip en rangordning av de behov och de otillfredsstllande socioekonomiska situationer som man frsker ta itu med genom gemenskapsstdramen samt en rangordning av de inneboende faktorer som skall tas i beaktande fr att garantera att resurser p ett optimalt stt riktas mot att uppfylla behoven. sikter klassificeras ofta fr allmnt och gr inte alltid att verifiera p ett objektivt stt.
There was no attempt to set more concrete objectives by identifying criteria which could have been useful for this purpose and no additional data was gathered for the purpose of micro analysis. 
Det gjordes inget frsk att faststlla konkretare ml genom att identifiera kriterier som kunde ha varit anvndbara fr detta syfte och inga ytterligare uppgifter samlades in fr mikroekonomisk analys.
Important considerations for a fuller assessment of effectiveness, such as deadweight and displacement effects, were often not considered, and when these aspects were raised, they were not analysed in sufficient detail. 
Viktiga aspekter fr en fullstndigare bedmning av ndamlsenlighet, till exempel ddvikts-och undantrngningseffekter, togs ofta inte i beaktande och nr dessa aspekter togs upp analyserades de inte tillrckligt i detalj.
Although there are a number of sections which have valid and useful observations, in general the Court finds this crucial chapter (2) in the Synthesis Report lacking robustness, with missing data and often weak conclusions and an insufficient or missing assessment of the results of other thematic studies commissioned by DG REGIO for the SFs for the 1994 to 1999 programme. 
Trots att det finns giltiga och anvndbara iakttagelser i flera avsnitt anser revisionsrtten att detta mycket viktiga kapitel (2) i den sammanfattande rapporten generellt sett inte r tillrckligt robust, eftersom uppgifter saknas, slutsatserna ofta r bristflliga och det antingen grs en otillrcklig bedmning av resultaten av andra tematiska studier som bestllts av GD Regionalpolitik fr strukturfonderna fr programperioden 1994Đ1999 eller ingen bedmning alls.
For example, in the ex post assessment section on transport, in the tables dealing with actual and target kilometres of roads improved by country, about half the target information is either missing or incomplete, making it difficult to get a robust conclusion on achievements as compared to targets. Yet, the Thematic Evaluation (3) of the Impact of Structural Funds on Transport Infrastructures for the same programme period, which is quoted frequently in the report, provides a more complete and rigorous assessment of the results by Member State. 
I tabellerna ver hur mnga kilometer vgstrckor som lnderna faktiskt har frbttrat eller har som mlsttning att frbttra i avsnittet om transport i efterhandsutvrderingen saknas omkring hlften av informationen om mlsttningen eller s r den ofullstndig, vilket gr det svrt att dra en tillfrlitlig slutsats om vad som uppntts i frhllande till mlen. nd ger den tematiska utvrderingen (3) av strukturfondernas effekt p transportinfrastruktur under samma programperiod, som ofta citeras i rapporten, en komplettare och striktare bedmning av resultaten per medlemsstat.
Of particular relevance to the ex post assessment is the estimated employment impact of transport programmes that is given in the Thematic Evaluation Report on Transport. 
Av srskild vikt fr efterhandsutvrderingen r den effekt som transportprogrammen frvntas ha p sysselsttningen och som presenteras i den tematiska utvrderingsrapporten om transportomrdet.
The total direct and indirect employment impact is estimated at 2,3 million person years (4). 
Den totala direkta och indirekta effekten p sysselsttningen uppskattas till 2,3 miljoner personr (4).
Furthermore the economic benefits of the transport programmes given in the study are judged to be significant. 
Dessutom bedms de ekonomiska frdelar av transportprogrammen som lggs fram i rapporten vara betydande.
In Ireland, the reported economic rate of return for road projects is given as 13 %, while that of Spain is given as 23 % (5). 
I Irland uppges den rapporterade ekonomiska avkastningen vara 13 % medan den fr Spanien uppges vara 23 % (5).
(2) (3) (4) (5) Chapter 3. 
(2) (3) (4) (5) Kapitel 3.
A thematic evaluation is an evaluation which transversally analyses a particular point (a theme) in the context of several interventions within a single programme or of several programmes implemented in different countries or regions. 
En tematisk utvrdering r en utvrdering dr man gr en tvrgende analys av ett srskilt tema i flera stdtgrder inom ett eller flera program som genomfrs i olika lnder eller regioner.
Thematic Evaluation of the Impact of Structural Funds on Transport Infrastructures, Final Report, November 2000, p. 
Tematisk utvrdering av strukturfondernas effekt p transportinfrastrukturer, slutrapport, november 2000, s.
For example, in the case of Ireland, this result means that for every 100 euro invested in terms of construction and operating costs, the value of journey time savings, vehicle operating cost savings and safety benefits, was 13 euro for each year. 
Till exempel nr det gller Irland betyder detta resultat att fr varje 100 euro som investerats i byggnation och underhll var vrdet av minskad restid, minskade kostnader fr fordonsdrift och frbttrad skerhet 13 euro per r.
Thus, the investment effectively paid for itself in eight years. 
Investeringen betalade sig allts i sjlva verket p tta r.
8). 
8.
12.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 302/11 34. 
12.12.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 302/11 34.
These two relevant conclusions of the Thematic Evaluation Report on Transport are not taken into consideration in the Synthesis Report. 
Dessa tv relevanta slutsatser i rapporten om den tematiska utvrderingen p transportomrdet beaktas inte i den sammanfattande rapporten.
Furthermore, the employment impact estimate in the thematic evaluation is inconsistent with that of the ex post study. 
Dessutom stmmer inte den uppskattade effekten p sysselsttningen som lggs fram i den tematiska utvrderingen med den som lggs fram i efterhandsutvrderingen.
Based on calculations made by the Court, the total employment impact of Structural Funds over the period 1994 to 1999, implied by the study (1) (using the HERMIN model and the assessment of the other regions) is 1,62 million jobs, which is inconsistent with the estimate of 2,3 million jobs in the thematic report, especially since transport only accounts for approximately 20 % of all Structural Fund expenditure. 
Enligt de berkningar som revisionsrtten har gjort utifrn uppgifterna i efterhandsutvrderingen r strukturfondernas totala effekt p sysselsttningen under perioden 1994Đ1999 (1) (med anvndning av Hermin-modellen och bedmningen av de andra regionerna) 1,62 miljoner arbetstillfllen, vilket inte stmmer verens med uppskattningen p 2,3 miljoner arbetstillfllen i den tematiska rapporten, srskilt som transport endast str fr omkring 20 % av alla strukturfondsutgifter.
In contrast, the results of the Thematic Evaluation of the Impact of the Structural Funds on SMEs are used in the Synthesis Report which states: ÔThe Thematic Evaluation of the Impact of Structural FundsŐ on SMEs recommends a shift from grant expenditure to financial engineering measures such as seed and venture capital funds, loans, interest rate subsidies in the future, arguing that these methods are more sustainable in the long term (2). 
Dremot anvnds resultaten av den tematiska utvrderingen av strukturfondernas effekt p sm och medelstora fretag i den sammanfattande rapporten dr det str att den tematiska utvrderingen av strukturfondernas effekt p sm och medelstora fretag rekommenderar en vergng frn std i form av bidrag till finansiell ingenjrskonst, till exempel startkapitalfonder eller riskkapitalfonder, ln, rntesubventioner i framtiden, med argumentet att dessa metoder r mer hllbara p lng sikt (2).
This is an important conclusion within the thematic study which the ex post assessment does well to bring out (3). 
Detta r en viktig slutsats i den tematiska studien som man gr rtt i att ta fasta p i efterhandsutvrderingen.
However, the report does not develop this issue further despite the important implications that could be drawn for future programmes. 
I rapporten utvecklas dock inte denna frga ytterligare trots den stora betydelse den kan ha fr framtida program (3).
The Synthesis Report quotes the Thematic Evaluation on the Impact of Structural Funds on SMEs as having estimated that Ôin the absence of Community support, 70 % of investment projects would have either not taken place at all, or been smaller in scale or postponedŐ. 
I den sammanfattande rapporten citeras den tematiska utvrderingen om strukturfondernas effekt p sm och medelstora fretag dr det str att om gemenskapsstd inte hade betalats ut hade 70 % av investeringsprojekten antingen inte gt rum alls eller utfrts i mindre skala eller skjutits upp.
The thematic evaluation Ôfurther estimates that such assistance contributed to creating more than 300 000 additional jobs, even after taking account of Ňdead-weightÓ and substitution effects. 
I den tematiska utvrderingen grs vidare uppskattningen att detta std bidrog till att ver 300 000 nya arbetstillfllen skapades, ven efter det att man har tagit hnsyn till Óddvikts-Ó och substitutionseffekter.
The ex post evaluation of Objective 1 is not able to replicate these figures owing to the lack of comparable and robust data on which to build such estimatesŐ (4). 
Efterhandsutvrderingen av ml 1 kan inte reproducera dessa sifferuppgifter p grund av att det saknas jmfrbara och stabila uppgifter som en sdan uppskattning skulle kunna grundas p (4).
Given the significance of the different results and that the two studies were prepared for the same contractor, treated the same subject, dealt with the same period and were published only two or three years apart, a fuller treatment of their differences was warranted. 
Med tanke p de olika resultatens betydelse och p att de tv studierna utfrdes fr samma uppdragsgivare, behandlade samma mne, beaktade samma period och offentliggjordes endast tv eller tre r efter varandra hade en mer heltckande underskning av skillnaderna mellan dem varit berttigad.
Following the above statement, in a section dealing with an Ôoverall analysisŐ, the Synthesis Report does give an estimate of the number of jobs created in SMEs as a result of the Structural Funds. 
Det finns faktiskt ett avsnitt i den sammanfattande rapporten med en Óvergripande analysÓ som innehller en uppskattning av antalet arbetstillfllen som skapats i sm och medelstora fretag till fljd av strukturfonderna.
This is in terms of gross jobs and does not take into account substitution, (1) See section on impact. (2) Synthesis Report, p. 105. 
Den vergripande ndamlsenligheten i frga om nettoeffekt (1) Se avsnittet om effekt. (2) Sammanfattande rapport, s. 105.
(3) The specific comment made was: ÔWhilst this would seem a logical recommendation, the context in which it is applied emerges as an important considerationŐ. 
(3) Den srskilda kommentar som gavs var att ven om detta kan verka vara en logisk rekommendation r den kontext i vilken den tillmpas ngot som mste beaktas.
(4) Synthesis Report, p. 108. deadweight or multiplier effects. The overall effectiveness in terms of net effects is unknowableŐ (5). 
(4) Sammanfattande rapport. s. 108. kan inte faststllas (5).
This conclusion is not given sufficient attention, especially in the light of the estimate provided in the thematic study on SMEs. 
Denna slutsats ges inte tillrcklig uppmrk-samhet, srskilt med tanke p de uppskattningar som gjordes i den tematiska studien om sm och medelstora fretag.
Furthermore, the table in the ex post study, giving a breakdown of employment created by Member State, provides no details for Spain, so that the estimate given is clearly incomplete (6). 
Dessutom finns det inga uppgifter om Spanien i den tabell i efterhandsutvrderingen som visar antalet skapade arbetstillfllen per medlemsstat, s uppskattningarna som ges r tydligt ofullstndiga (6).
This aspect merited a more in-depth examination in the ex post evaluation. 
Denna aspekt hade frtjnat att granskas mer ingende i efterhandsutvrderingen.
In the Ôother topicsŐ which the Synthesis Report covers under Effectiveness, there is a useful if brief summary of various pertinent issues under a number of headings. 
Bland de Óvriga frgorÓ som den sammanfattande rapporten behandlar i avsnittet om ndamlsenlighet, finns en anvndbar om n kort sammanfattning av olika relevanta frgor under ett antal rubriker.
However, one underlying limitation is Ôweak comparative data which has forced a qualitative assessment rather than a detailed project-based assessmentŐ (7). 
En inneboende begrnsning r bristande jmfrbara uppgifter vilket har tvingat fram en kvalitativ bedmning istllet fr en detaljerad projektbaserad bedmning (7).