natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We reviewed the expert’s work and visited some of the sampled schools and identified the following issues: (a) The sampling of schools was not random, but was based on recommendations from an external consultant team with UNESCO and approved by the Ministry of Education. 
Vi granskade expertens arbete och beskte ngra av de utvalda skolorna, och identifierade fljande problem: a) Urvalet av skolor var inte slumpmssigt utan baserades p rekommendationer frn ett externt konsultteam frn Unesco och godkndes av utbildningsministeriet.
There was a risk that the sample was biased. (b) Even though the expert actually visited the 30 sampled schools, the data was only compared for 17 of them. 
Det fanns risk fr att urvalet var vinklat. b) Trots att experten faktiskt beskte de 30 utvalda skolorna jmfrdes enbart uppgifterna mellan 17 av dem.
This was because the Ministry did not have the information for the remaining schools. 
Det berodde p att ministeriet inte hade ngon information om de terstende skolorna.
Therefore, the conclusions drawn by the external expert on the reliability of the ministry’s IT system were based on insufficient evidence. (c) The field checks on staff working in the schools referred only to teachers, but the target for indicator 1 referred also to non-teaching staff, so the conclusions obtained on this indicator were incomplete. (d) The expert concluded that the field data confirmed the ministry’s data. 
Den externa expertens slutsatser om hur tillfrlitligt ministeriets it-system var grundades sledes p otillrckliga bevis. c) Kontrollerna p plats som rrde personal i skolorna omfattade enbart lrare, men mlet fr indikator 1 hnvisade ven till vrig personal. Slutsatserna fr denna indikator var sledes ofullstndiga. d) Experten drog slutsatsen att fltuppgifterna bekrftade ministeriets uppgifter.
For indicators 1 (number of staff) and 2 (number of students), this conclusion was achieved by comparing the total results for the sample. 
Fr indikatorerna 1 (personalantal) och 2 (antal studenter) nddes denna slutsats genom att jmfra de totala resultaten fr urvalet.
However, the individual results per school exhibit significant differences (positive and negative) which are offset when calculating the totals. 
De enskilda resultaten per skola visar dock p betydande skillnader (positiva och negativa) som jmnas ut nr totalsummorna berknas.
For some variable tranches, the performance data provided by the partner countries did not justify the payments made 47 Out of a total of €234 million variable tranche payments reviewed, for five out of eight countries, our assessment of the evidence supporting the fulfilment of variable tranche indicators shows different results from those accepted by the Commission, amounting to €13.3 million, in which one country (Pakistan) represented a 19 % difference to the variable tranche payments. 
Fr ngra rrliga delbetalningar styrkte inte de prestationsuppgifter som lmnades av partnerlnderna de gjorda utbetalningarna 47 Vi granskade sammanlagt 234 miljoner euro i utbetalningar av rrliga delbetalningar och vr bedmning, fr fem av tta lnder, av bevisen fr att indikatorerna hade uppfyllts utmynnar i andra resultat n dem som godtogs av kommissionen nr det gller 13,3 miljoner euro. Fr ett land (Pakistan) motsvarade
Furthermore, we also found that the Commission disbursed €3.4 million to two countries based on indicators linked to incorrectly set baselines. Although there was a contractual obligation to pay, as the target value had been met, no actual progress in the area measured with the indicator had been achieved. 
Vidare konstaterade vi ven att kommissionen betalade ut 3,4 miljoner euro till tv lnder p grundval av indikatorer som var kopplade till felaktiga utgngsvrden. ven om det fanns en kontraktsenlig skyldighet att betala, eftersom mlvrdet hade uppntts, hade inga faktiska framsteg skett p det omrde som mttes med indikatorn.
Table 1 summarises these amounts for each country visited. 
I tabell 1 sammanfattas dessa belopp fr varje beskt land.
48 The main issues we found related to: (i) targets achieved with delay after the deadlines set; (ii) measurement of results based on incorrectly set baselines; (iii) incorrect or insufficient evidence provided to justify the fulfilment of the indicators; and (iv) targets not achieved at all. 
48 De frmsta problemen vi konstaterade var kopplade till i) ml som uppnddes med frseningar efter de faststllda tidsfristerna, ii) mtning av resultat p grundval av felaktiga utgngsvrden, iii) felaktiga eller otillrckliga bevis som styrkte att indikatorerna hade uppfyllts och iv) ml som inte nddes alls.
Figure 6 shows the types and proportion of discrepancies found from the Commission’s assessments. 
I figur 6 visas de olika typer av avvikelser som hittades i kommissionens bedmningar och hur betydande de r.
Figure 6 – Types of discrepancies Types of discrepancies (€16.74 million) Target achieved with delay Incorrect baseline/target applied €3.45 M €3.08 M €2.38 M €7.83 M 30 Incorrect evidence Target not achieved Source: ECA. 
Figur 6 Đ Typer av avvikelser Typ av avvikelser (16,74 miljoner euro) Mlet uppntt med frsening Felaktigt utgngsvrde/ml 7,83 miljoner euro 29 Felaktiga bevis Ml ej uppntt 3,45 miljoner euro 3,08 miljoner euro Klla: Revisionsrtten. 2,38 miljoner euro
49 One of the cases where we considered that incorrect evidence was provided by the partner countries is described in Box 11. 
30 49 Ett av de fall dr vi bedmde att partnerlandet hade lmnat felaktiga bevis beskrivs i ruta 11.
31 Box 11 Evidence based on biased sample The target for indicator 6.3 of the Education contract in Pakistan (contract 24) was that students receiving vouchers should achieve a school attendance rate of at least 80 %. 
Ruta 11 Bevis byggde p ett vinklat urval Mlet fr indikator 6.3 i utbildningskontraktet fr Pakistan (kontrakt 24) var att studenter som fick kuponger skulle ha en skolnrvaro p minst 80 %.
The evidence provided by the partner country showed an attendance rate, which was higher than the target value (87 %), so the Commission considered this target to have been met. 
Det bevis som lmnades av partnerlandet visade en nrvaroandel som var hgre n mlvrdet (87 %), s kommissionen ansg att mlet hade uppntts.
The evidence provided was supposed to cover, according to Technical Assistance Compliance report, all students throughout the year. 
Det bevis som lmnades skulle, enligt efterlevnadsrapporten vid tekniskt bistnd, omfatta alla studenter under hela ret.
However, our analysis showed that the national authorities had taken only a quarter of the students receiving vouchers into account when calculating the attendance rate for all of them. 
Vr analys visade dock att de nationella myndigheterna enbart hade tagit en fjrdedel av de studenter som fick kuponger i beaktande nr de berknade nrvaron fr alla sdana studenter.
We concluded therefore that the supporting evidence was not robust, as the sample was biased. 
Vi konstaterade drfr att det styrkande underlaget inte var tillfrlitligt eftersom urvalet var vinklat.
50 In four contracts we found five cases of indicators11 whose targets had been achieved after the deadline set in the financial agreements. 
50 I fyra kontrakt fann vi fem fall dr indikatorernas11 ml hade uppntts efter den tidsfrist som faststllts i finansieringsverenskommelsen.
Furthermore, for five additional indicators12, we consider that partner countries did not meet the targets; however, the Commission deemed them to have been fulfilled. 
Vidare, nr det gller ytterligare fem indikatorer12, anser vi att partnerlnderna inte uppfyllde mlen. Kommissionen ansg dock att de hade uppfyllts.
32 Box 12 Targets met after deadlines, or partly or not met The target was achieved after the deadline for indicator 5 of the Education contract in Jordan (contract 1). 
Ruta 12 Ml uppnddes efter tidsfristerna, delvis eller inte alls Mlet uppnddes efter tidsfristen fr indikator 5 i utbildningskontraktet i Jordanien (kontrakt 1).
The target for this indicator was the construction of six new schools by 2015. 
Mlet fr denna indikator var att sex nya skolor skulle anlggas senast 2015.
The schools were only finished in 2017 and the variable tranche was paid in December 2017. 
Skolorna var frdiga frst 2017 och den rrliga delbetalningen betalades ut i december 2017.
The reason for this considerable delay was the lengthy procurement procedures which resulted in the late implementation of the construction works by national authorities. 
31 frseningen var de utdragna upphandlingsfrfarandena som ledde till att de nationella myndigheterna genomfrde byggnadsarbetena sent.
To take into account these delays, the Commission extended the implementation period of the contract up to December 2017 but did not modify the deadline for the construction of the schools (2015). 
Fr att ta hnsyn till frseningarna frlngde kommissionen kontraktets genomfrandeperiod till och med december 2017 men ndrade inte tidsfristen fr byggandet av skolorna (2015).
The target of indicator 6 of the Education contract in Pakistan (contract 23) included two activities: the design of the English language curriculum and the approval of textbooks for certain grades. 
Mlet fr indikator 6 i utbildningskontraktet i Pakistan (kontrakt 23) inbegrep fljande tv verksamheter: utformning av lroplanen fr engelska och godknnande av lrobcker fr vissa rskurser.
We found out that only half of the textbooks had been approved at the time when the disbursement was requested and therefore consider that the second part of the target should have not been considered as achieved. 
Vi konstaterade att enbart hlften av lrobckerna hade godknts vid den tidpunkt d man anskte om utbetalning och anser drfr att den andra delen av mlet inte borde ha betraktats som uppndd.
The target for indicator 1.7 of the Agriculture contract in Georgia (contract 6) was the adoption of a state programme on bio-organic production certification schemes. 
Mlet fr indikator 1.7 i jordbrukskontraktet i Georgien (kontrakt 6) var att ett statligt program fr certifieringsordningar fr ekologisk produktion skulle antas.
The government considered this indicator as fulfilled due to the adoption of its State Programme for Tea Plantation Rehabilitation. 
Regeringen ansg att indikatorn var uppfylld i och med antagandet av det statliga programmet fr terstllande av teplantager.
However, the stated aim of the programme is to support effective utilization of tea plantations in Georgia, increase tea production, including bio tea production, and to enhance self-sufficiency and export potential and not bio-organic certification schemes as such. 
Det angivna mlet med programmet r dock att stdja ndamlsenlig anvndning av teplantager i Georgien, ka teproduktionen, dribland ekologisk teproduktion, och att strka sjlvfrsrjningen och exportpotentialen Đ inte ekologiska certifieringsordningar som sdana.
We consider this target as not fulfilled, as the programme does not specifically target certification of bio products. 
Vi anser att mlet inte har uppntts, eftersom programmet inte specifikt r inriktat p certifiering av ekologiska produkter.
This was also the position of the external reviewer. 
Detta var ven den externa granskarens stndpunkt.
51 We found three cases where the Commission had made disbursements in accordance with the provisions of the financial agreements, since the partner countries had achieved the agreed targets. 
51 Vi fann tre fall dr kommissionen hade gjort utbetalningar i enlighet med bestmmelserna i finansieringsverenskommelserna, eftersom partnerlnderna hade ntt de ml man enats om.
However, due to the use of incorrectly set baseline or target values, there was no actual progress in the targeted sectors. 
Faktum var dock att oriktiga utgngsvrden eller mlvrden anvndes och att det inte hade skett ngra faktiska framsteg i de berrda sektorerna.
Box 13 provides further details on some of these cases. 
I ruta 13 finns nrmare uppgifter om vissa av fallen:
33 Box 13 Targets set using incorrect baselines – no actual progress achieved Indicator 7 of the Transport contract in Ethiopia (contract 14) relates to the percentage of trucks overloaded. 
32 Ruta 13 Ml som faststllts med hjlp av felaktiga utgngsvrden Đ inga faktiska framsteg Indikator 7 i transportkontraktet i Etiopien (kontrakt 14) rr procentandelen verlastade lastbilar.
The target set was to reduce this percentage to 9 % from a baseline value of 11 %. 
Mlet var att minska procentandelen till 9 % frn ett utgngsvrde p 11 %.
The result achieved at the end of the period examined was 6 % and therefore the target was attained and the corresponding amount paid in accordance with the provisions of the financing agreement. 
Det resultat som hade uppntts i slutet av den period som granskades var 6 % Đ allts hade mlet uppntts och motsvarande belopp betalades ut i enlighet med bestmmelserna i finansieringsverenskommelsen.
However, based on the information provided by the partner country in the disbursement request, the actual baseline value was 6 %. 
Utifrn den information som lmnades av partnerlandet i utbetalningsanskan var dock det faktiska utgngsvrdet 6 %.
In reality, there was no progress on decreasing the actual number of trucks overloaded. 
I realiteten hade det inte skett ngra framsteg i frga om att minska det faktiska antalet verlastade lastbilar.
A second instance of an incorrect baseline leading to payment without enough actual progress is indicator 5 of the Energy contract in Rwanda (contract 19). 
Ett andra exempel p ett felaktigt utgngsvrde som leder till utbetalning utan att det skett tillrckliga faktiska framsteg r indikator 5 i energikontraktet i Rwanda (kontrakt 19).
This indicator measures the share of electricity generated from renewable sources in the energy mix. 
Denna indikator mter andelen el frn frnybara kllor i energimixen.
The baseline value used in the contract was 292 GWh generated in 2015. 
Utgngsvrdet som anvndes i kontraktet var de 292 GWh som genererades 2015.
The actual value for the baseline year was wrong. 
Det faktiska vrdet fr referensret var felaktigt.
According to data reported by the national authorities, it should have been 368 GWh. 
Enligt uppgifter som rapporterades av de nationella myndigheterna borde det ha varit 368 GWh.
The target set for the audited variable tranche was an additional 14.5 GWh generated from renewable energy sources compared with the baseline. 
Det ml som faststlldes fr den granskade rrliga delbetalningen var ytterligare 14,5 GWh frn frnybara energikllor jmfrt med utgngsvrdet.
The result achieved for this indicator in the audited period was 361.5 GWh leading to the payment of the corresponding amount even though there had been a decrease in the proportion of electricity generated from renewable sources. 
Det resultat som uppnddes fr denna indikator under den granskade perioden var 361,5 GWh, vilket ledde till att motsvarande belopp betalades ut trots att det skett en minskning av andelen el frn frnybara kllor.
52 In addition to the discrepancies quantified in Table 1, we could not confirm the correctness of two variable tranche payments due to the lack of sufficient evidence to support the values reported for five indicators13 (see examples Box 14). 
52 Utver de avvikelser som kvantifierats i tabell 1 kunde vi inte bekrfta om tv utbetalningar av rrliga delbetalningar var korrekta p grund av att det saknades tillrckliga bevis till std fr de vrden som rapporterades fr fem indikatorer13 (se exempel i ruta 14).
These indicators represent a disbursed amount of €3.77 million. 
Dessa indikatorer motsvarar ett utbetalat belopp p 3,77 miljoner euro.
34 Box 14 Lack of sufficient evidence In contract 5, supporting public finance management in Jordan, indicator 1.2 related to gaps in the training of the Internal Control Units (ICU) staff in different national ministries and agencies. 
33 Ruta 14 Brist p tillrckliga bevis I kontrakt 5, till std fr frvaltning av de offentliga finanserna i Jordanien, rrde indikator 1.2 luckor i utbildningen av personal vid enheter fr internkontroll inom olika nationella ministerier och byrer.
The target was to train the ICU staff who had not participated in the training during the previous year (there was no numerical target). 
Mlet var att utbilda personal vid enheterna som inte hade deltagit i utbildningen under fregende r (det fanns inget sifferml).
An external expert hired by the Commission concluded that over 85 % of the staff from all ICUs had attended an additional training course offered. 
En extern expert som anlitades av kommissionen konstaterade att ver 85 % av personalen frn alla enheter fr internkontroll hade deltagit i en extra utbildningskurs.
As the expert report did not specify how the 85 % was calculated, we could not re-perform the calculation or confirm that all gaps were covered by the training. 
Eftersom expertens rapport inte klargjorde p vilket stt 85 % berknades kunde vi inte gra om berkningen eller bekrfta att samtliga luckor hade tgrdats av utbildningen.
There was no information or data available on what was included in the 85 %. 
Det fanns ingen tillgnglig information eller tillgngliga uppgifter om vad som inbegreps i de 85 %.
Indicator 3 in the community development programme contract in Pakistan, (contract 22) measured the share of budgetary allocations for community-driven local development (DCLD) projects in the cost estimates of the district development strategies (DDS). 
Indikator 3 i kontraktet fr samhllsutvecklingsprogrammet i Pakistan (kontrakt 22) mtte andelen budgetanslag till projekt fr lokalt ledd utveckling vid berkningen av kostnader fr distriktsutvecklingsstrategierna.
However, the district cost estimates reported could not be traced to the DDS provided as a supporting document. 
De rapporterade kostnadsberkningarna fr distrikten kunde dock inte spras till distriktsutvecklingsstrategierna, som lmnades som styrkande handling.
Similarly, the report produced by the expert hired by the Commission to assess this indicator does not present a reconciliation between the district cost estimates and the DDS. 
Rapporten som utarbetades av den expert som kommissionen anlitade fr att bedma indikatorn innehller inte heller en avstmning mellan kostnadsberkningarna fr distrikten och distriktsutvecklingsstrategierna.
Therefore, we could not confirm the reported result. 
Drfr kunde vi inte bekrfta de rapporterade resultaten.
13 Indicators 3 and 6 of Contract 22 and indicators 1.2, and 3 and of Contract 5. 
13 Indikatorerna 3 och 6 i kontrakt 22 och indikatorerna 1.2 och 3 i kontrakt 5.
Insufficiently documented payments to Moldova 53 Although not linked directly to the verification of performance indicators we found that the Commission had paid three variable tranches to Moldova, a total amount of €26.3 million, without sufficiently documenting the reasons supporting these payments (see Box 15). 
Otillrckligt dokumenterade utbetalningar till Moldavien 53 ven om det inte r direkt kopplat till kontrollen av resultatindikatorer konstaterade vi att kommissionen hade betalat ut tre rrliga delbetalningar till Moldavien, totalt 26,3 miljoner euro, utan att ha dokumenterat sklen till utbetalningarna tillrckligt (se ruta 15).
35 Box 15 Documentation of payments to Moldova The budget support financing agreements contain a right for the Commission to suspend the financing agreement if the partner country breaches an obligation relating to respect for human rights, democratic principles and the rule of law and in serious cases of corruption (Art 236(4) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the Union, July 2018). 
34 Ruta 15 Dokumentation av utbetalningar till Moldavien Enligt finansieringsverenskommelserna fr budgetstd har kommissionen rtt att upphva finansieringsverenskommelsen om partnerlandet sidostter en skyldighet som gller respekten fr mnskliga rttigheter, demokratiska principer och rttsstatsprincipen och i allvarliga fall av korruption (artikel 236.4 i frordningen om finansiella regler fr unionens allmnna budget, juli 2018).
Due to concerns about the state of democracy in the country, in July and October 2017, the Commission decided to postpone the payment of several variable tranches and stated that “the timing of the payment would be clarified taking into account the respect of effective democratic mechanisms, the rule of law and human rights in Moldova.” 
P grund av oro ver det demokratiska lget i landet beslutade kommissionen i juli och oktober 2017 att skjuta upp utbetalningen av flera rrliga delbetalningar och angav att tidpunkten fr betalningen skulle klargras med beaktande av respekt fr effektiva demokratiska mekanismer, rttsstatsprincipen och mnskliga rttigheter i Moldavien.
The main reason for this decision was the impending adoption of the new electoral law in Moldova, which was not consistent with the recommendations of the Venice Commission, an advisory body of the Council of Europe in matters of constitutional law. 
Den huvudsakliga anledningen till beslutet var det nra frestende antagandet av en ny vallag i Moldavien, vilken inte var frenlig med rekommendationerna frn Venedigkommissionen (ett rdgivande organ vid Europardet i frgor som rr statsrtt).
Nevertheless, a payment authorisation was issued on 11 December 2017. 
Trots detta utfrdades ett betalningsbemyndigande den 11 december 2017.
It was not supported by an assessment demonstrating the improvement of the democratic mechanisms and human rights in Moldova, which was the main reason for withholding the payment in the first place. 
Det underbyggdes dock inte av en bedmning som visade att demokratiska mekanismer och mnskliga rttigheter i Moldavien hade frbttrats, vilket var den frmsta anledningen till att utbetalningen hade hllits inne.
Conclusions and recommendations 54 We examined whether the Commission used relevant and reliable performance data for disbursing budget support variable tranches. 
Slutsatser och rekommendationer 54 Vi granskade om kommissionen anvnde relevanta och tillfrlitliga prestationsuppgifter fr utbetalningar av budgetstd i rrliga delbetalningar.
Furthermore, the Commission’s assessments of whether variable tranche indicators had been met was not always reliable, leading to some insufficiently justified payments. 
Vidare var kommissionens bedmningar av om indikatorerna fr rrliga delbetalningar hade uppfyllts inte alltid tillfrlitliga, vilket ledde till att vissa utbetalningar inte var tillrckligt styrkta.
55 We found that the variable tranche performance indicators were well aligned to the partner countries’ sector development strategies. 
55 Vi konstaterade att prestationsindikatorerna fr de rrliga delbetalningarna var vl anpassade till partnerlndernas strategier fr sektorutveckling.
However, most of them were focused on short-term actions rather than longer-term results, including progress towards the sustainable development goals. 
Merparten av dem var dock inriktade p kortsiktiga tgrder snarare n lngsiktigare resultat, exempelvis framsteg mot mlen fr hllbar utveckling.
Only 13 % of the 248 indicators we reviewed measured outcomes or impacts in the supported sectors (see paragraphs 22 to 25). 
Endast 13 % av de 248 indikatorer som vi granskade mtte utfall eller effekter inom de sektorer som fick std (se punkterna 22Đ 25).
The use of outcome indicators would enable the Commission to better measure longer-term results in the supported sectors, including progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. 
Anvndningen av utfallsindikatorer skulle gra det mjligt fr kommissionen att bttre mta lngsiktiga resultat inom de sektorer som fr std, inbegripet framsteg mot att n mlen fr hllbar utveckling.