natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, Article 152 of the EC Treaty gives the EU only limited competence for public health policy. 
Enligt artikel 152 i EG-frdraget har dock EU endast begrnsad behrighet nr det gller folkhlsopolitik.
Accordingly, the added value of EU activities in the field of health promotion, including those carried out under the PHP, lies above all in facilitating cooperation between the stakeholders in different Member States. 
Drmed ligger mervrdet i EU-verksamheten p omrdet fr hlsofrmjande, inbegripet den som genomfrs inom folkhlsoprogrammet, framfr allt i att den underlttar samarbetet mellan berrda parter i olika medlemsstater.
Of the types of projects carried out under the PHP, networks provide the highest likelihood of EAV and most clearly address the need of actors in the field to share ‘good practice’, develop common standards and guidelines and exchange knowledge. 
Av de olika typer av projekt som genomfrdes inom folkhlsoprogrammet r det ntverk som mest sannolikt tillfr ett europeiskt mervrde och tydligast tillgodoser aktrernas behov av att utbyta Ógod praxisÓ, utarbeta gemensamma standarder och riktlinjer och utbyta kunskaper.
However, the main implementation mechanism of the PHP (i.e. grants for actions awarded through calls for proposals) is not the most appropriate mechanism for funding such networks. 
Folkhlsoprogrammets viktigaste mekanism fr genomfrande (dvs. bidrag till tgrder som tilldelas genom inbjudningar att lmna frslag) r dock inte den lmpligaste mekanismen fr att finansiera dessa ntverk.
This is also the case for activities that are supposed to contribute to the Commission’s policy development. 
Detta gller ven verksamheter som ska bidra till kommissionens utveckling av politiken.
41 Special Report No 2/2009 — The European Union’s Public Health Programme (2003–07): an effective way to improve health? 
41 Srskild rapport nr 2/2009 Đ Europeiska unionens folkhlsoprogram (2003Đ2007): Ett ndamlsenligt stt att frbttra hlsan?
With regard to project management, the Court found that partnerships generally worked well. 
Nr det gller projektfrvaltning konstaterade revisionsrtten att partnerskapen i regel fungerade vl.
The Commission’s monitoring of ongoing projects was however ad hoc rather than systematic and did not provide formal feedback to participants. 
Kommissionens vervakning av pgende projekt var dock snarare ÓtillflligÓ n systematisk och gav ingen uttrycklig feedback till deltagarna.
Projects did produce the deliverables set out in the grant agreement, but promoters rarely disseminated results actively.The ex post evaluation of projects has not yet become common practice among participants. 
Projekten levererade visserligen de delar som angavs i bidragsverenskommelsen, men resultaten spreds sllan aktivt av projektledarna. Utvrderingen i efterhand av projekt har nnu inte blivit allmn praxis bland deltagarna.
42 RECOMMENDATION 2 Where the current PHP (2008–13) is concerned, the Commission should undertake a mapping exercise in order to gain an overview of projects undertaken and their results to identify the existing overlaps and any remaining gaps in its project portfolio. 
42 REKOMMENDATION 2 Nr det gller det nuvarande folkhlsoprogrammet (2008Đ2013) br kommissionen gra en kartlggning av pgende projekt fr att f en verblick ver dem och ver deras resultat i syfte att identifiera befintliga verlappningar och eventuella kvarstende luckor i projektportfljen.
The number of annual ‘action areas’ should be significantly reduced, and they should be focused on strategic priorities. 
Antalet rliga ÓtgrdsomrdenÓ br minskas markant och inriktas p strategiska prioriteringar.
The Commission should also address weaknesses in project design and implementation by: • bringing project objectives into line with programme objectives and the refocused ‘annual priorities’ recommended above. 
Kommissionen br ven tgrda brister i utformningen och genomfrandet av projekt genom att gra fljande: Ľ Anpassa projektmlen till programmlen och till de ndrade Órliga prioriteringarÓ som rekommenderas ovan.
In addition, grant agreements should establish not only which activities are to be undertaken, but also the desired results of those activities, the target groups and how the results will be used in a sustainable manner after project completion; • setting quantified targets and performance indicators wherever possible in order to facilitate the monitoring of progress towards objectives; • evaluating projects ex post in order to improve the design of forthcoming projects (and putative successor programmes) by applying ‘lessons learnt’. 
Dessutom br man i bidragsverenskommelserna inte enbart faststlla vilka verksamheter som ska genomfras utan ven de nskade resultaten av dessa verksamheter, mlgrupperna och hur resultaten ska anvndas p ett hllbart stt efter det att projektet har avslutats. Ľ Faststlla kvantifierade ml och resultatindikatorer i den mn det r mjligt fr att underltta vervakningen av de framsteg som gjorts fr att uppn mlen. Ľ Utvrdera projekten i efterhand fr att frbttra utformningen av kommande projekt (och eventuella efterfljande program) genom att dra lrdom av tidigare erfarenheter.
Finally, the Commission should fully exploit the existing PHP (2008–13) funding mechanisms for networks (ie. operating grants) in the current programming period, since they are more suitable for such activities than grants for actions. 
Slutligen br kommissionen till fullo utnyttja det nuvarande folkhlsoprogrammets (2008Đ2013) finansieringsmekanismer fr ntverk (dvs. bidrag till driftskostnader) under den nuvarande programperioden, eftersom de passar bttre fr sdana verksamheter n bidrag till tgrder.
For service contracts, the Commission should make use of the increased ceiling (20 % rather than 10 % of the available budget) to carry out activities contributing to policy development. 
Nr det gller tjnstekontrakt br kommissionen anvnda det kade taket (20 % i stllet fr 10 % av den disponibla budgeten) fr att bedriva verksamhet som bidrar till att utveckla politiken.
However, this will require a more rigorous definition of terms of reference than in calls for proposals. Special Report No 2/2009 — The European Union’s Public Health Programme (2003–07): an effective way to improve health? 
Detta kommer dock att krva att direktiven fr en striktare definition n i inbjudningarna till att lmna frslag. Srskild rapport nr 2/2009 Đ Europeiska unionens folkhlsoprogram (2003Đ2007): Ett ndamlsenligt stt att frbttra hlsan?
OVERALL CONCLUSION 91. 
ALLMN SLUTSATS 91.
The PHP was set very broad and ambitious objectives that contrasted sharply with the limited means at its disposal. 
Inom folkhlsoprogrammet sattes mycket omfattande och ambitisa ml upp som stod i skarp kontrast till de begrnsade medel som det hade till sitt frfogande.
This imbalance has widened further since the current PHP (2008–13) was launched. 
Denna obalans har blivit n strre sedan det nuvarande folkhlsoprogrammet (2008Đ2013) startade.
The audit suggests that it is difficult for such programmes to have a demonstrable impact on citizens’ health. 
Resultaten av revisionen tyder p att det r svrt fr sdana program att ha ngon mrkbar inverkan p medborgarnas hlsa.
Where there is ‘European added value’, it lies primarily in enabling intermediaries to network and to exchange ‘good practice’ with a view to complementing national programmes and activities. 
I de fall d det frekommer ett Óeuropeiskt mervrdeÓ handlar det frmst om att gra det mjligt fr mellanhnder att anvnda ntverk och utbyta Óbsta praxisÓ fr att komplettera nationella program och verksamheter.
Moreover, the Court notes the existence of cooperation mechanisms such as the ‘open method of coordination’ which permits such networking and exchanges. 
Revisionsrtten noterar vidare att det finns samarbetsmekanismer som den Óppna samordningsmetodenÓ som mjliggr sdant ntverksarbete och utbyte.
41 This is a method of cooperation based on the principle of voluntary intergovernmental cooperation. 
41 Detta r en samarbetsmetod som bygger p principen om frivilligt mellanstatligt samarbete.
It relies in particular on mutual learning, benchmarking and the sharing of best practice. o t e C o u t o u d t o s F Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira President or th e C o ur t of A u di t or s 43 RECOMMENDATION 3 For the period after 2013, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should reconsider the scope for EU public health activities and the approach to EU funding in this area. 
Det bygger srskilt p msesidigt lrande, riktmrkning och utbyte av bsta praxis. F  r r e v i s i o n s r  t t e n F  r r e v i s i o n s r  t t e n 43 REKOMMENDATION 3 Europaparlamentet, rdet och kommissionen br omprva omfattningen av EU:s folkhlsoverksamhet och EU:s finansieringsmetod p detta omrde fr perioden efter 2013.
This should be done bearing in mind the budgetary means available and the existence of other cooperation mechanisms (such as the ‘open method of coordina-tion’41) as a means of facilitating collaboration and the exchange of information among stakeholders throughout Europe. 
Nr man gr detta br man beakta de disponibla budgetmedlen och frekomsten av andra samarbetsmodeller (till exempel den Óppna samordningsmetodenÓ41) som kan underltta samarbetet och utbytet av information mellan berrda parter i hela Europa. Den pgende budgetversynen erbjuder ett frsta tillflle att vervga detta.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 5 March 2009. 
Denna rapport har antagits av revisionsrtten vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 5 mars 2009.
Special Report No 2/2009 — The European Union’s Public Health Programme (2003–07): an effective way to improve health? 
44 BILAGA I Srskild rapport nr 2/2009 Đ Europeiska unionens folkhlsoprogram (2003Đ2007): Ett ndamlsenligt stt att frbttra hlsan?
ANNEX II PHP (‘HEALTH DETERMINANTS’ STRAND) — ANALYSIS OF SIX POLICY AREAS DRUGS 1. 
BILAGA II FOLKHLSOPROGRAMMET (KOMPONENTEN ÓBESTMNINGSFAKTORER F R HLSANÓ) Đ ANALYS AV SEX POLITIKOMRDEN NARKOTIKA 1.
In December 2004 the European Council endorsed the EU drugs strategy (2005–12), a framework for two consecutive four-year action plans on drugs. 
I december 2004 godknde Europeiska rdet EU:s strategi fr bekmpning av narkotika (2005Đ2012), en ram fr tv p varandra fljande fyrariga handlingsplaner mot narkotika.
The strategy’s two general aims cover public health (prevention of drug use, harm reduction and treatment) and security (enforcement of laws prohibiting drug production and trafficking). 
Strategins tv vergripande syften gller folkhlsa (frebyggande av narkotikamissbruk, minskning av skadeverkningar samt behandling) och skerhet (tillmpning av lagstiftning som frbjuder narkotikaproduktion och narkotikahan-del).
Policy development is led by DG JLS, and the bulk of project funding goes to research projects managed by DG RTD and DG TREN. 
Politikutvecklingen leds av generaldirektoratet fr rttvisa, frihet och skerhet, och huvudparten av projektfinansieringen gr till forskningsprojekt som frvaltas av generaldirektoratet fr forskning och generaldirektoratet fr energi och transport.
A Drugs Prevention and Information Programme has been set up for 2007–13 and is managed by DG JLS (budget 21 million euro). 
Ett program fr frebyggande av och information om narkotikamissbruk inrttades fr 2007Đ2013 och frvaltas av generaldirektoratet fr rttvisa, frihet och skerhet (budget 21 miljoner euro).
This has similar objectives and target participants to the PHP. 
Detta program har liknande ml och mlgrupper som folkhlsoprogrammet.
The European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drugs Addiction (EMCDDA) provides the EU and its Member States with a common information framework on drugs. 
Europeiska centrumet fr kontroll av narkotika och narkotikamissbruk (ECNN) frser EU och dess medlemsstater med en gemensam ram fr information om narkotika.
The EMCDDA collects information on all aspects of drug use based on a network of national monitoring centres. 
ECNN samlar in uppgifter om alla aspekter av narkotikamissbruk som bygger p ett ntverk av nationella vervakningscentrum.
It has also set up a database of best practices in drug prevention. 
Det har ocks upprttat en databas med bsta praxis nr det gller att frebygga narkotikamissbruk.
The drugs projects funded from the PHP were few in number and covered a wide range of aspects and contexts of the drugs problem. 
De narkotikaprojekt som finansierades genom folkhlsoprogrammet var f till antalet och omfattade ett brett urval av aspekter och sammanhang nr det gller narkotikaproblem.
However, they shared a common focus on research/collection of information and the exchange of best practices. 
De hade dock en gemensam inriktning p efterforskning/insamling av uppgifter och utbyte av bsta praxis.
The Court noted that some of their objectives and activities, for example data collection and setting up a database of best practices, overlapped with the EMCDDA’s field of activity. 
Revisionsrtten noterade att en del av deras ml och verksamheter, till exempel insamling av uppgifter och upprttande av en databas med bsta praxis, verlappade ECNN:s verksamhetsomrde.
They could be carried out more cost/time-efficiently by the EMCDDA. 
De skulle ha kunnat genomfras p ett mer kostnads-och tidseffektivt stt av ECNN.
In view of the existence of the EMCDDA and the dedicated Drugs Prevention and Information Programme, the value of including drugs projects in the EU’s health programmes should be reconsidered. 
Med tanke p att ECNN och det specialiserade programmet fr frebyggande av och information om narkotikamissbruk finns br man vervga om narkotikaprojekt verkligen ska ing i EU:s folkhlsoprogram.
45 Special Report No 2/2009 — The European Union’s Public Health Programme (2003–07): an effective way to improve health? 
45 Srskild rapport nr 2/2009 Đ Europeiska unionens folkhlsoprogram (2003Đ2007): Ett ndamlsenligt stt att frbttra hlsan?
ANNEX II ALCOHOL 4. 
BILAGA II ALKOHOL 4.
However, harmful alcohol consumption is estimated to be responsible for about 10 % of the total disease burden, as well as creating or aggravating other social or economic problems such as accidents and violence. 
Skadlig alkoholkonsumtion uppskattas dock svara fr cirka 10 % av den totala sjukdomsbrdan och uppskattas ven skapa eller frvrra andra sociala eller ekonomiska problem som olyckor och vld.
The most (cost-)effective alcohol control policies are legal restrictions, which come under the remit of Member States (higher purchase tax, reduced availability and measures to combat drink-driving and underage drinking). 
Den mest (kostnads)effektiva alkoholkontrollpolitiken r rttsliga begrnsningar som faller under medlemsstaternas behrighet (hgre omsttningsskatt, minskad tillgnglighet och tgrder fr att bekmpa rattfylleri och alkoholkonsumtion bland minderriga).
In response to conclusions published in 2001 by the Council, in October 2006 the Commission produced a strategy for reducing alcohol-related harm. 
Som svar p de slutsatser som rdet offentliggjorde 2001 utarbetade kommissionen i oktober 2006 en strategi fr att minska alkoholrelaterade skador.
The strategy offers support for harm-reduction projects, data collection and the development of information and education measures in cooperation with Member States. 
Strategin erbjuder std till projekt som arbetar med minskning av skadeverkningar, uppgiftsinsamling och informationsutveckling och utbildningstgrder i samarbete med medlemsstaterna.
Where industry is concerned, the EC alcohol strategy relies on voluntary codes and self-regulation rather than legal restrictions. 
Nr det gller industrin bygger EG:s alkoholstrategi snarare p frivilliga regler och sjlvreglering n p rttsliga begrnsningar.
In June 2007 the EC set up a European Alcohol and Health Forum with representatives from the business sector (alcohol producers, the advertising industry, the media, retailers and caterers) and public health and civil society organisations. 
I juni 2007 inrttade EG ett europeiskt forum fr alkohol och hlsa med fretrdare frn nringslivet (alkoholproducenter, reklamindustrin, medierna, detaljhandlare och restauratrer) och folkhlsoorganisationer och det civila samhllets organisationer.
Forum members are invited to commit to stepping up actions to reduce alcohol-related harm, for example by promoting responsible commercial communications. 
Medlemmarna i forumet uppmanas att ta sig att pskynda tgrderna fr att minska alkoholrelaterade skadeverkningar, till exempel genom att frmja ansvarsfulla kommersiella meddelanden.
The PHP projects addressing alcohol were characterised by a great deal of overlap in the partners involved and the information produced. 
Folkhlsoprogrammets alkoholprojekt knnetecknades av en stor verlappning av arbetet hos inblandade partner och i framtagen information.
Three of the five projects in the sample collected data and produced reports on the alcohol policy situation in each EU Member State. 
Tre av de fem projekten i urvalet samlade in uppgifter och skrev rapporter om den alkoholpolitiska situationen i varje EU-medlemsstat.
Meanwhile, a major comprehensive report on ‘Alcohol in Europe’ was produced for the Commission, as well as a report entitled ‘Alcohol policies in EU Member States and Norway’, which was produced using funding from the former Community Action Programme on Health Promotion. 
Samtidigt utarbetades en omfattande rapport om ÓAlkohol i EuropaÓ fr kommissionens rkning och ven en rapport med titeln ÓAlkohol-politiken i EU:s medlemsstater och NorgeÓ, som skrevs med hjlp av finansiering frn gemenskapens tidigare hlsofrmjande handlingsprogram.
This overlap can be explained by the absence of an EU alcohol strategy to orientate priorities in the years before 2006 and the lack of a mapping exercise of previous activities in this field. 
Denna verlappning kan frklaras av att det saknades en alkoholstrategi p EU-niv fr att rikta prioriteringarna under ren fre 2006 och ven en kartlggning av tidigare verksamheter p detta omrde.
46 Special Report No 2/2009 — The European Union’s Public Health Programme (2003–07): an effective way to improve health? 
46 Srskild rapport nr 2/2009 Đ Europeiska unionens folkhlsoprogram (2003Đ2007): Ett ndamlsenligt stt att frbttra hlsan?
ANNEX II TOBACCO 7. 
BILAGA II TOBAK 7.
According to WHO, tobacco use is a leading cause of preventable premature death in the world today. 
Enligt WHO r tobaksbruk den frmsta orsaken till frtida ddsfall som kan frebyggas i vrlden i dag.
The most (cost-)effective health promotion measure in connection with tobacco is legislation (higher purchase tax, restrictions on smoking in the workplace, advertising bans), which should be combined with consumer education through health warnings and campaigns. 
Den mest (kostnads)effektiva hlsofrmjande tgrden nr det gller tobak r lagstiftning (hgre omsttningsskatt, restriktioner mot rkning p arbetsplatsen, reklamfrbud) som skulle kunna kombineras med konsumentutbildning genom var-ningstexter och hlsokampanjer.
Community support for anti-tobacco organisations began as early as 1987 with the Europe Against Cancer programme. 
Gemenskapsstd till antirkorganisationer brjade s tidigt som 1987 med programmet Europa mot cancer.
The EU has also adopted legislative measures on tobacco control. 
EU har ocks vidtagit lagstiftningstgrder om tobakskontroll.
They are based on the EU’s competence in the internal market as laid down in Article 95 of the EC Treaty. 
De grundar sig p EU:s behrighet p den inre marknaden ssom den faststlls i artikel 95 i EG-frdraget.
In particular, two major directives were adopted in 2001 and 2003 on tobacco products and advertising respectively. 
Srskilt tv viktiga direktiv antogs 2001 respektive 2003 om tobaksvaror och tobaksreklam.
More recently, the Green Paper ‘Towards a Europe free from tobacco smoke: policy options at EU level’ was published at the beginning of 2007. 
P senare tid har grnboken ÓMot ett rkfritt Europa: policyalternativ p EU-nivÓ offentliggjorts i brjan av 2007.
More important programmes are public anti-smoking campaigns financed by the Community Tobacco Fund, which derives its resources from a levy on subsidies awarded to the EU’s tobacco producers. 
Viktigare program r offentliga antirkkampanjer som finansieras genom gemenskapens tobaksfond, som fr sina resurser genom att ta ut en avgift p de std som tilldelas EU:s tobaksproducenter.
To date the Tobacco Fund has financed two large awareness-raising campaigns. 
Hittills har tobaksfonden finansierat tv stora upplysningskampanjer.
The latest campaign, ‘HELP — For a life without tobacco’, was launched in 2005 with a budget of 72 million euro over four years. 
Den senaste kampanjen ÓHELP Đ Fr ett liv utan tobakÓ, startade 2005 med en budget p 72 miljoner euro under fyra r.
It was devised for the Commission by a consortium of health experts and PR professionals, and includes a roadshow and TV spots broadcast in all EU Member States. 
Den utformades till kommissionen av ett konsortium av hlso-och sjukvrdsexperter och pr-experter, och innefattar en turn och tv-inslag i EU:s alla medlemsstater.
The tobacco projects financed from the PHP consisted mainly of two large networks which had already been receiving funding since 1996 under the predecessor action programmes. 
De tobaksprojekt som finansierades av folkhlsoprogrammet bestod frmst av tv stora ntverk som redan hade ftt finansiering sedan 1996 inom ramen fr de tidigare handlingsprogrammen.
One dealt with smoking prevention in general, but with a strong focus on tobacco-control advocacy and lobbying, and the other focused on young people. 
Det ena handlade om att frebygga rkning i allmnhet, men var starkt inriktat p antirkkampanjer och lobbyverksamhet, medan det andra var inriktat p ungdomar.
As these networks were not officially eligible for financing, they were turned into ‘framework projects’ coordinating several sub-projects. In 2005 this structure was abandoned, and some sub-projects continued as stand-alones. 
Eftersom dessa ntverk inte officiellt hade rtt till finansiering omvandlades de till ÓramprojektÓ som samordnade ett antal delprojekt. r 2005 vergavs denna struktur och ngra delprojekt fortsatte som fristende projekt.
While the effect of the PHP projects is not measurable, the Community funding indirectly enabled the general network and its member organisations to conduct successful tobacco-control advocacy and lobbying activities at both EU and national level. 
Effekten av folkhlsoprogramprojekten gr visserligen inte att mta, men indirekt bidrog gemenskapsfinansieringen till att det allmnna ntverket och dess medlemssorganisationer kunde genomfra framgngsrika antirkkampanjer och bedriva lobbying bde p EU-niv och nationell niv.
One example is recent legislation in several Member States banning smoking in public places. 
Ett exempel r den nya lagstiftningen i flera medlemsstater som frbjuder rkning p offentliga platser.
47 Special Report No 2/2009 — The European Union’s Public Health Programme (2003–07): an effective way to improve health? 
47 Srskild rapport nr 2/2009 Đ Europeiska unionens folkhlsoprogram (2003Đ2007): Ett ndamlsenligt stt att frbttra hlsan?
ANNEX II NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY 12. 
BILAGA II KOST OCH MOTION 12.
Rising public concern about the increasing obesity rate, especially among children, has been reflected in several Commission actions in recent years. In 2006 the Commission published the White Paper ‘A strategy for Europe on nutrition, overweight and obesity-related health issues’. 
Den vxande oron ver det kade antalet verviktiga, srskilt bland barn, r ngot som har speglats i flera kommissionsinsatser p senare r. r 2006 offentliggjorde kommissionen vitboken om en EU-strategi fr hlsofrgor som rr kost, vervikt och fetma.