natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Proposals will be submitted to the opinion of the Trade Mechanisms Committee regarding mandatory information in documents (control copy T5) stating whether a refund is requested and an estimation of the total amount. (g) The Court informed the Commission of these findings and the Commission requested Member States in the Trade Mechanism Committee on 11 November 2006 to pay more attention to this aspect. 
Frslagen kommer att lmnas till kommittn fr handelsmekanismer, som fr diskutera frgan om obligatoriska uppgifter i handlingar (kontrollexemplaret T5) samt avgra huruvida ett bidrag har begrts och bifoga en berkning av det totala beloppet. g) Revisionsrtten informerade kommissionen om dessa synpunkter, och vid mtet i kommittn fr handelsmekanismer den 11 juli 2006 uppmanade kommissionen medlemsstaterna att rikta strre uppmrksamhet mot denna aspekt.
Recommendation 4 The Commission is preparing a modification of Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002: Ń taking into account the principles of cost-effectiveness of controls (2) In the third copy of the export declaration accompanying the products to the customs office of exit (Article 793 of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93), or in the control copy T5. 
Rekommendation 4 Kommissionen frbereder en ndring av frordning (EG) nr 2090/2002 som innebr att Ń hnsyn skall tas till principen om kostnadseffektivitet vid kontrollerna, (2) I den tredje kopian av den exportdeklaration som medfljar produkterna till utfrseltullkontoret (artikel 793 i frordning (EEG) nr 2454/93) eller i kontrollkopia T5.
C 252/26 EN Official Journal of the European Union 26.10.2007 Ń with a percentage expressing the norm for substitution checks replacing the Ôone per day ruleŐ. 
C 252/26 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 26.10.2007 Ń en procentandel som uttrycker normen fr utbyteskontrollerna skall erstta Óen-om-dagen-principenÓ, Ń obligatoriska frklareringskontroller skall genomfras innan tullen anbringar frseglingar, varigenom det skerstlls att andra sndningar verkligen kan bli freml fr utbyteskontroller.
Ń introducing mandatory pre-clearance checks before customs affixes seals, thus ensuring that other consignments really qualify for selection for substitution checks. so that the legal provisions express what already has been explained in working documents to Member States in this respect. 
Drigenom kommer lagen att uttrycka vad som redan har frklarats i arbetsunderlag till medlemsstaterna i detta avseende.
The Commission will continue carefully checking the Member StatesŐ Annual reports on this issue, as has been provided in point 2.7 of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002. 
Kommissionen kommer att fortstta med ingende kontroller av medlemsstaternas rsrapporter i rendet, vilket freskrivs i punkt 2.7 i bilaga III till frordning (EG) nr 2090/2002.
57. (a) The Commission has acted on the findings of the auditors. 
57. a) Kommissionen har vidtagit tgrder utifrn revisorernas synpunkter.
They were discussed with Member States in the Trade Mechanisms Committee and addressed in different working documents to Member States. 
De har diskuterats med medlemsstaterna i kommittn fr handelsmekanismer och tagits upp i ett flertal arbetsunderlag till medlemsstaterna.
In addition, the Commission is preparing changes to the relevant legislation. Moreover, the relevant findings of the Court have been taken up with the Member States concerned under the clearance of accounts procedure. (c) The physical checks under Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 form part of an overall comprehensive system of controls, which, in addition to the physical checks, consist of 100 % ex-ante administrative checks of refund payment claims, of ex-post controls under Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89 and of the CommissionŐs own audits within the clearance of accounts. 
Dessutom har aktuella synpunkter frn revisionsrtten tagits upp med berrda medlemsstater i arbete med avslutandet av rkenskaperna. c) Fysiska kontroller enligt frordning (EEC) nr 386/90 utgr en del av ett vergripande omfattande kontrollsystem, som, utver de fysiska kontrollerna, till 100 % utgrs av administrativa frhandskontroller av terbetalningskrav, efterhandskontroller enligt frordning (EEG) nr 4045/89 och av kommissionens egna revisioner inom ramen fr avslutandet av rkenskaperna.
It is on the basis of this chain of controls that the Commission obtains reasonable assurance on the expenditure concerned. 
Det r p grundval av denna verifikations-kedja som kommissionen fr en rimlig frskran om de berrda utgifterna.
Recommendation 5 The Commission is preparing a modification of Regulation (EC) No 2090/2002 on the issue of predictability. 
Rekommendation 5 Kommissionen frbereder en ndring av frordning (EG) nr 2090/2002 i frga om frutsgbarhet.
Initiatives will be taken to introduce mandatory application of risk analysis in conformity with Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1875/2006 regarding risk analysis in customs import and export procedures. 
Initiativ kommer att tas till obligatorisk till-lmpning av riskanalys i enlighet med artikel 3 i frordning (EG) nr 1875/2006 om riskanalys vid tullfrfarandeni samband med import och export.
Regarding the selection for substitution checks, see third part of fourth recommendation. 
Vad gller urvalet vid utbyteskontroller, se tredje delen i fjrde rekommendationen.
27.11.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/1 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 5/2007 on the CommissionŐs Management of the CARDS programme together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) (2007/C 285/01) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................... 
27.11.2007 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 285/1 IV (Upplysningar) UPPLYSNINGAR FRN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER OCH ORGAN REVISIONSRTTEN SRSKILD RAPPORT nr 5/2007 om kommissionens frvaltning av Cardsprogrammet samt kommissionens svar (i enlighet med artikel 248.4 andra stycket i EG-frdraget) (2007/C 285/01) INNEHLLSF RTECKNING F RKORTNINGAR ..................................................................... 3 SAMMANFATTNING ........................................................
SUMMARY ................................................................ 
INLEDNING ............................................................... REVISIONENS OMFATTNING OCH INRIKTNING SAMT REVISIONSMETOD . . . . . . . . . . . .
OBSERVATIONS............................................................ 
IAKTTAGELSER ............................................................ Brister i den strategiska vgledningen under programplaneringsprocessen . . . . . . . . . . .
Weaknessesinstrategicguidanceintheprogrammingprocess .................... 
Frvaltningsstrukturernaintealltidlmpliga ..............................
Managementstructuresnotalwaysappropriate ............................ 
Stdet tillhandhlls snabbt men tillrcklig hnsyn togs inte till mottagarlndernas frmgaatttillgodograsigstdet ......................................
Aid delivered rapidly but without taking sufficiently into account recipient countriesŐ absorptioncapacity.................................................. 
Mottagarlndernas ansvar begrnsat under projektidentifieringsfasen och upphandlingsfasen .........................................................
C 285/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.11.2007 CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 
C 285/2 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 27.11.2007 SLUTSATSEROCHREKOMMENDATIONER ......................................
To what extent did the projects financed encourage recipient country ownership? . . . . . 
VarkommissionensfrvaltningavCardsprogrammeteffektiv? ....................
How far was monitoring and evaluation effective in identifying weaknesses and disseminating information, and was timely subsequent action taken by the Commission? . . . . . 
Var den strategiska vgledningen fr programmen relevant och konsekvent? . . . . . . . . .
Paragraph Page 61-70 15 61 15 62-64 15 65-67 15 68-69 16 70 16 TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 
Var de frvaltningsstt som kommissionen hade infrt och anvnt lmpliga och effek-tiva?.................................................................. I vilken utstrckning frmjade de finansierade projekten mottagarlandets egenansvar? . . . .
19 27.11.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/3 ADF BiH CARDS CFCU CSP DG ELARG DG RELEX EAR EC ECPA EU EURALIUS FRY FYROM HQ IPA KFOR MIP OSCE OVI ROM SAI SAp SR UN UNMIK WB ABBREVIATIONS Albanian Development Fund Bosnia and Herzegovina Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation Central Finance and Contracting Unit Country Strategy Paper Directorate-General for Enlargement Directorate-General for External Relations European Agency for Reconstruction European Commission EC Police Assistance mission in Albania European Union European Assistance Mission to the Albanian Justice System Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Headquarter Instrument for Pre-Accession NATO led Kosovo Force Multiannual Indicative Programme Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Objectively Verifiable Indicators Result Oriented Monitoring Supreme Audit Institution Stabilisation and Association process Special Report of the European Court of Auditors United Nations United Nations Mission in Kosovo World Bank 
19 27.11.2007 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 285/3 ADF Cards CFUE EU EURALIUS KFOR OSSE FN UNMIK F RKORTNINGAR Albanska utvecklingsfonden (Albanian Development Fund) Gemenskapens bistndsprogram fr teruppbyggnad, utveckling och stabilisering Centrala finansierings-och upphandlingsenheten Europeiska unionen Europeiskt uppdrag fr std till det albanska rttsvsendet Natoledd Kosovostyrka Organisationen fr skerhet och samarbete i Europa Frenta nationerna Frenta nationernas uppdrag i Kosovo
C 285/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. The main objectives of the ÔCommunity Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and StabilisationŐ (CARDS) programme are to contribute to the recipientsŐ participation in the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAp) and to increase the responsibility of the western Balkan countries and entities in relation to that process. 
C 285/4 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning SAMMANFATTNING I. Det frmsta syftet med Ógemenskapens bistndsprogram fr teruppbyggnad, utveckling och stabilise-ringÓ (Cardsprogrammet) r att stdja mottagarlndernas deltagande i stabiliserings-och associeringsprocessen och frstrka ansvaret hos lnderna p vstra Balkan och de organ som tar emot std genom denna process.
CARDS was designed to encourage sustainable and EU compatible reform, consolidate stability and to bring the region closer to the European Union. 
Cards utformades fr att uppmuntra en hllbar och EU-kompatibel reform, strka stabiliteten och fra regionen nrmare Europeiska unionen.
For the period of 2000 to 2006 the programme has had a budget allocation of more than 5 000 million euro (see paragraphs 1 to 7). 
Fr perioden 2000Đ2006 hade programmet en budgettilldelning p ver 5 000 miljoner euro (se punkterna 1Đ7).
This was done by assessing (see paragraph 8): (a) whether the strategic guidance directing the programme was appropriate and coherent; (b) whether the management approaches established and used by the Commission were appropriate and efficient; (c) whether projects financed by the programme encouraged recipient country ownership; and (d) whether monitoring and evaluation were effective in identifying weaknesses and disseminating their findings, and the subsequent action taken by the Commission was timely. 
Detta gjordes (se punkt 8) genom en bedmning av a) om den strategiska vgledningen fr programmet var lmplig och konsekvent, b) om de frvaltningsstt som kommissionen har infrt och anvnt var lmpliga och effektiva, c) om de projekt som finansierades genom programmet frmjade mottagarlndernas egenansvar, d) om vervakningen och utvrderingen var ndamlsenlig nr det gllde att identifiera brister och sprida resultat, och om kommissionens uppfljning i gjordes i tid.
The CommissionŐs strategic guidance was very general. 
Kommissionens strategiska vgledning var mycket allmnt hllen.
This was adequate for the reconstruction phase but not for the more challenging institution building objectives. 
Den lmpade sig fr teruppbyggnadsfasen, men inte fr de mer krvande institutionsuppbyggnadsmlen.
The country strategy papers did not provide sufficient orientation, particularly as they were not supported by timely sectoral strategies. 
Landstrategidokumenten gav inte tillrcklig vgledning, srskilt som det inte fanns ngra sektorspecifika strategier tillgngliga i tid.
The multi-annual indicative programmes did not prioritise between or within the different areas of intervention. 
I de flerriga vgledande programmen gjordes inga prioriteringar mellan eller inom de olika interventionsomrdena.
The European partnerships introduced in 2004 were not used to improve guidance for selection of actions (see paragraphs 11 to 27). 
De europeiska partnerskapen som infrdes 2004 anvndes inte fr att frbttra vgledningen fr urval av insatser (se punkterna 11Đ27).
The CARDS Regulation unified the legal bases. 
Med Cardsfrordningen samlades de rttsliga grunderna.
The Commission was also successful in ensuring that aid was delivered quickly although this was sometimes at the expense of the capacity of the recipient countries to benefit from the aid. 
Kommissionen sg ocks med framgng till att stdet tillhandahlls snabbt, ven om detta ibland skedde p bekostnad av mottagarlndernas kapacitet att dra nytta av stdet.
The Commission used four different management approaches. 
Kommissionen anvnde fyra olika frvaltningsstt.
The two main approaches Ń devolved Delegations and the European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) Ń were mostly effective and appropriate (see paragraphs 28 to 41). 
De tv huvudsakliga frvaltningsstten Đ delegationer med delegerat ansvar och Europeiska byrn fr teruppbyggnad Đ var vervgande effektiva och lmpade sig fr syftet (se punkterna 28Đ41).
V. While recipient country ownership was considered a priority by the Commission, there was no consistent approach to achieving this aim and the management approaches used did not encourage such ownership (see paragraphs 42 to 54). 
V. Trots att kommissionen sg mottagarlndernas egenansvar som en prioriterad frga hade den ingen konsekvent metod fr att uppn detta ml och de frvaltningsstt som anvndes frmjade inte ett sdant egenansvar (se punkterna 42Đ54).
VI. Monitoring and evaluation was good in parts, but inconsistencies exist between the Delegations and the EAR. 
VI. vervakningen och utvrderingen var delvis god, men det frekom inkonsekvenser mellan delegationerna och Europeiska byrn fr teruppbyggnad.
An absence of adequate project indicators compromised the effectiveness of monitoring (see paragraphs 55 to 60). 
Bristen p adekvata projektindikatorer gjorde vervakningen mindre ndamlsenlig (se punkterna 55Đ60).
The Court concludes that the CommissionŐs management of the CARDS programme was largely successful in contributing to stabilisation and reconstruction in the recipient countries. 
Revisionsrtten drar slutsatsen att kommissionens frvaltning av Cardsprogrammet i det stora hela bidrog positivt till stabiliseringen och teruppbyggnaden i mottagarlnderna.
However, the aid was less effective in improving administrative capacities, due to an initially low concentration on institution building and insufficient recipient country capacity to absorb the assistance provided (see paragraphs 61 to 70). 
Stdet var dock inte lika ndamlsenligt nr det gllde att frbttra den administrativa kapaciteten p grund av man till en brjan endast i liten utstrckning inriktade sig p institutionsuppbyggnad och p grund av otillrcklig kapacitet i mottagarlandet att tillgodogra sig stdet (se punkterna 61Đ70).
The CARDS Regulation came to an end in 2006 and the new Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance came into effect in 2007. 
Cardsfrordningen upphrde att glla 2006 och det nya instrumentet fr std infr anslutningen trdde i kraft 2007.
The Court recommends that the Commission: improves its strategic guidance; ensures that implementation speed takes full account of beneficiariesŐ ability to absorb the assistance; establishes an effective strategy for ensuring recipient country ownership; and extends best practice in monitoring and evaluation (see paragraphs 61 to 70). 27.11.2007 
Revisionsrtten rekommenderar att kommissionen frbttrar sin strategiska vgledning, ser till att genomfrandet grs i en takt som tar hnsyn till mottagarnas frmga att tillgodogra sig stdet, upprttar en ndamlsenlig strategi fr att garantera mottagarlndernas egenansvar och sprider bsta arbetsmetoder fr vervakning och utvrdering (se punkterna 61Đ70). 27.11.2007
27.11.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 285/5 INTRODUCTION 1. 
27.11.2007 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 285/5 INLEDNING 1.
CARDS is the acronym for ÔCommunity Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and StabilisationŐ. 
Cards str fr Ógemenskapens bistndsprogram fr teruppbyggnad, utveckling och stabiliseringÓ.
The CARDS programme (1) covers the following countries of the western Balkans: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 
Cardsprogrammet (1) gller fljande lnder p vstra Balkan: Albanien, Bosnien och Hercegovina, Kroatien, Frbundsrepubliken Jugoslavien och fre detta jugoslaviska republiken Makedonien.
Concerning the assistance to the FRY and its successor the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (2), the CARDS programme was split into three annual programmes: Serbia (3), Kosovo and Montenegro. 
Nr det gller stdet till Frbundsrepubliken Jugoslavien och dess successorstat Stats-frbundet Serbien och Montenegro (2) delades Cardsprogrammet upp i tre rliga program: Serbien (3), Kosovo och Montenegro.
CARDS is part of the European UnionŐs Stabilisation and Association strategy towards the western Balkans, which emerged in response to the wars in former Yugoslavia during the 1990s. 
Cards r ett led i Europeiska unionens stabiliserings-och associeringsstrategi fr vstra Balkan, som tillkom efter krigen i forna Jugoslavien under 1990-talet.
The Stabilisation and Association strategy marked the end of the military conflict, the start of physical reconstruction and economic re-launch of the countries (i.e. stabilisation) and increasingly closer ties with the European Union (i.e. association). 
Stabiliserings-och associe-ringsstrategin markerade slutet p den militra konflikten, brjan p fysisk teruppbyggnad och ett ekonomiskt uppsving i lnderna (dvs. stabilisering) och allt ttare band till Europeiska unionen (dvs. associering).
The European Council meeting in June 2000 was explicit that this integration could ultimately mean membership of the European Union. 
Vid Europeiska rdets sammantrde i juni 2000 sades det uttryckligen att denna integration i slutndan skulle kunna innebra medlemskap i Europeiska unionen.
The preamble of the CARDS Regulation describes the main objective of the assistance: ÔThe existing Community assistance should be expanded and redirected to adjust it to the European UnionŐs political objectives for the region and, particularly, to contribute to the stabilisation and association process and increase the responsibility of the recipient countries and entities in relation to that processŐ. Also, according to the Regulation the regional dimension of Community assistance should be given special attention. 
I ingressen till Cardsfrordningen beskrivs det frmsta syftet med stdet: ÓDet nuvarande gemenskapsbistndet br utvecklas och omorienteras fr att anpassas till Europeiska unionens politiska ml i denna region, srskilt fr att det skall kunna bidra till att utveckla stabiliserings-och associeringsprocessen och frstrka ansvaret hos de lnder och organ som mottar std genom denna process.Ó Enligt frordningen br ven srskild uppmrksamhet gnas gemenskaps-bistndets regionala aspekt.
The Stabilisation and Association process (SAp) is a progressive partnership in which the EU offers a mixture of trade concessions (Autonomous Trade Measures), economic and financial assistance (CARDS Programme) and contractual relationships (Stabilisation and Association Agreements). 
Stabiliserings-och associeringsprocessen r ett progressivt partnerskap genom vilket EU erbjuder en blandning av han-delskoncessioner (autonoma handelstgrder), ekonomisk och finansiell hjlp (Cardsprogrammet) och upphandlingsrelationer (stabiliserings-och associeringsavtal).
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2666/2000 (OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p. 
(1) Rdets frordning (EG) nr 2666/2000 (EGT L 306, 7.12.2000, s.
1). (2) In February 2003 the FRY was restructured into a State Union of two republics ÔSerbia and MontenegroŐ. 
1). (2) I februari 2003 omstrukturerades Frbundsrepubliken Jugoslavien till ett statsfrbund mellan tv republiker, ÓSerbien och MontenegroÓ.
The Constitutional Charter allowed, after three years, either republic to hold a referendum for their independence. 
Den konstitutionella stadgan tillt vardera republik att efter tre r hlla en folkomrstning om sjlvstndighet.
Montenegro held an independence referendum in the spring of 2006 in line with international standards. 
Montenegro hll en folkomrstning om sjlvstndighet vren 2006 i linje med internationella normer.
The vote for severing ties with Serbia exceeded the 55 % threshold, allowing Montenegro to formally declare its independence on 3 June 2006. 
Rsterna fr att klippa banden med Serbien versteg 55 %-trskeln, vilket gjorde att Montenegro formellt kunde utropa sjlvstndighet den 3 juni 2006.
Two days later, Serbia declared that it was the successor state to the union of Serbia and Montenegro. 
Tv dagar senare frklarade Serbien sig vara successorstat till statsfrbundet Serbien och Montenegro.
(3) Throughout the report reference to Serbia therefore excludes the province of Kosovo. 
(3) Nr Serbien nmns i denna rapport avses drfr inte Kosovoprovin-sen.
In the period from 2000 to 2006 the CARDS programme had a total budget of over 5 000 million euro, mainly for investment support and institution building. 
Under perioden 2000Đ2006 hade Cardsprogrammet en total budget p ver 5 000 miljoner euro, huvudsakligen till investeringsstd och institutionsuppbyggnad.
The total population in the western Balkans region is around 24 million. 
Den totala befolkningen i vstra Balkan-regionen r omkring 24 miljoner.
Thus the CARDS allocation represents an annual support of 30 euro per capita demonstrating the political importance that the EU attaches to the region (4). 
Cards-anslagen utgr sledes ett rligt std p 30 euro per capita, vilket visar vilken politisk vikt EU fster vid regionen (4).
7. CARDS programme, until early 2005, was the joint responsibility of the Directorate-General for External Relations (DG RELEX) and the EuropeAid Co-operation Office. 
6. r a) b) c) d) 7. ningen av Cardsprogrammet tills brjan av 2005 mellan generaldirektoratet fr yttre frbindelser (GD Yttre frbindelser) och byrn fr samarbete EuropeAid.
DG RELEX had the responsibility for political relations and strategic development such as preparation of the country strategy papers and multiannual indicative programmes. 
GD Yttre frbindelser hade ansvaret fr politiska relationer och strategisk utveckling ssom utarbetande av landstrategidokument och flerriga vgledande program.
The EuropeAid Co-operation Office was responsible for the management of the annual programmes. 
Byrn fr samarbete EuropeAid hade ansvaret fr frvaltningen av de rliga programmen.