natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This involves national authorities and the individual farmer agreeing a farm plan which identifies how much nitrogen can be applied to each field, and when, in order to ensure both pollution prevention for the environment and profitability for the farmer. 
Detta innebr att de nationella myndigheterna och den enskilde jordbrukaren enas om en plan fr jordbruksfretaget i vilken man faststller hur mycket kvve som fr anvndas p varje ker, och nr, i syfte att skerstlla frebyggande av miljfrore-ningar och lnsamhet fr jordbrukaren.
A field-level approach is appropriate, because the ability of farmland to retain nitrogen is dependent on the characteristics of each individual field: for example soil composition, the current crop’s capacity to absorb nitrogen, the cropping history, field gradient, and proximity to water courses. 
Det r lmpligt att arbeta p kerniv eftersom kermarkens frmga att bevara kvve beror p varje enskild kers egenskaper: till exempel jordsammanstt-ning, den aktuella grdans kvveupptagningsfrmga, tidigare grdor, kerns lutningsgrad och avstnd till vattendrag.
Such fertilisation planning is administratively demanding, both of Member State authorities and farmers, but it has been found to constitute a practical and effective method of combating nitrates pollution. of water consumption than specified in the theoretical agronomic tables, in return for extra AE aid: although the programme requires that in such circumstances the farmer must install a flow-meter in order to prove his compliance, in practice this requirement was not universally applied in the first years of programme operation. 
En sdan gdningsplanering r administrativt krvande, fr bde medlemsstatens myndigheter och jordbrukarna, men den har visat sig vara en praktisk och ndamlsenlig metod att bekmpa nitratfrore-ningar. ter till och med jordbrukarna att deklarera en lgre vattenfrbrukning n den som anges i de teoretiska odlingstekniska tabellerna, varvid de fr mer std; enligt programmets regler mste jordbrukarna d stta in vattenmtare s att de kan styrka sin konsumtion, men detta krav tillmpades inte generellt under programmets frsta r.
There is a risk that a farmer could use more water than is specified in these tables if he wished to maximise yields. 
Det finns risk fr att jordbrukarna anvnder mer vatten n vad som anges i tabellerna fr att maximera sina skrdar.
Due to such inadequacies in control, the Commission has requested a financial correction from the Spanish authorities in respect of this programme. 
P grund av dessa brister i kontrollen har kommissionen begrt en finansiell rttelse frn de spanska myndigheterna fr detta program.
Some control problems appear unique to individual programmes, but are symptomatic of the difficulty which national administrations experience in developing control systems adequate to the demands of the AE policy approach. 
Vissa kontrollproblem frefaller vara unika fr de enskilda programmen men r likvl symptomatiska fr de nationella myndigheternas svrigheter att utforma kontrollsystem som tillgodoser de behov som uppkommit i och med valet av tillvgagngsstt fr miljprogrammen.
In Castile-La Mancha, in order to control water use the authorities rely on theoretical agronomic tables of water consumption which set out how much each type of crop should normally consume (see paragraphs 54 and 55). The authorities even allow farmers to declare a lower rate 80. 
I den spanska regionen Castilla-La Mancha litar myndigheterna till teoretiska odlingstekniska tabeller ver olika grdors normala vattenbehov nr de kontrollerar vattenfrbrukningen (se punkterna 54Đ55). Myndigheterna till-80. Liknande specifika kontrollproblem fanns i Finland, dr 80 % av inspektionerna bestr i att man studerar satellitbilder.
The Finnish State Audit Office identified ‘significant deficiencies in administrative control procedures... . 
Statens revisionsverk fann Óavsevrda brister i de administrativa kontrollfrfarandena.
For example, in 1998 environmental management programmes were missing for around 3 000 farms and farming plans for nearly 5 000 farms out of a total of approximately 77 000 farms. 
Exempelvis saknades miljstyrningsprogram r 1998 fr omkring 3 000 jordbruksfretag och odlingsplaner fr nstan 5 000 av totalt omkring 77 000 fretag.
The necessary administrative controls have not been used to ensure that farmers have met the conditions for support before support has been paid’. The State Audit Office also identified wide regional variance in inspection rates, and regional variance in the severity of 
Ndvndiga administrativa kontroller av att jordbrukarna uppfyller stdvillkoren har inte gjorts innan std har utbetalatsÓ. Statens revisionsverk upptckte ocks stora regionala skillnader i
8.12.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 353/31 sanctions applied to farmers in the event of non-compliance with programme requirements (1). 
8.12.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 353/31 inspektionsfrekvensen liksom skillnader i frga om hur strnga straff de jordbrukare fick som inte efterlevde programkraven (1).
For example in Finland, although the programme requires an inspection visit prior to plantation approval, the Court found no evidence of such visits being made for some of the beneficiaries. 
I Finland skall exempelvis enligt programmet ett inspektionsbesk gras innan en plantering godknns, men revisionsrtten fann inga bevis fr att sdana besk hade gjorts hos en del av stdmottagarna.
Furthermore, in one forestry centre none of the beneficiaries had implemented their projects as approved by the authorities. 
Dessutom visade det sig p en skogs-bruksort att ingen av stdmottagarna hade genomfrt sina projekt i enlighet med de frslag som myndigheterna hade godknt.
In one case the Court found that a plantation approved for broad-leaved trees consisted entirely of conifers. 
I ett fall upptckte revisionsrtten att en plantering som hade godknts fr lvtrd i sjlva verket uteslutande bestod av barrtrd.
In Extremadura (Spain), one beneficiary was paid to build 25 km of forest tracks; however, he built only 17 km, and improved a further 3 km. 
I Extremadura (Spanien) fick en mottagare betalt fr att anlgga 25 kmskogsvg,menhananladebara17kmochfrbttradeytter-ligare 3 km.
In the same case, the authorities failed to deduct ineligible surfaces, including a river, from the claimed area. 
I samma rende underlt myndigheterna att rkna bort arealer som inte berttigade till std Đ bl.a. en flod Đ frn stdarealen.
The auditors found no supporting documents were kept showing that claims had been checked prior to payment or how inspectors had in practice verified compliance. 
Revisorerna fann att det saknades dokumentation som visade att anskningar hade kontrollerats fre betalning och hur inspektrerna i praktiken hade kontrollerat efterlevnaden av programkraven.
Commission inspectors identified similar problems in Castile-Leon and Castile-La Mancha in 1997/1998. 
Kommissionens inspektrer fann liknande problem i Castilla-Len och Castilla-La Mancha 1997/ 98.
Control problems were also identified in Italy (Emilia-Romagna) and Austria. 
Kontrollproblem upptcktes ocks i Italien (Emilia-Romagna) och sterrike.
Follow-up 82. 
Uppfljning 82.
The Community’s Financial Regulation Article 2 requires the Commission, acting in collaboration with the Member States, to ensure that Community expenditure takes place within the context of programmes with specific objectives; and that performance against objectives is measured. 
Enligt artikel 2 i gemenskapens budgetfrordning skall kommissionen i samarbete med medlemsstaterna skerstlla att utgifter verkstlls inom program med specifika ml, och att resultatet utvrderas utifrn mlen.
But as already indicated, evaluation work has been undermined from the outset by the failure at both Community and Member State level to support the design of the programmes and the setting of the objectives with a baseline survey of the state of the environment. 
Men som redan nmnts har utvrderingsarbetet redan frn brjan underminerats i och med att man varken p EU-niv eller i medlemsstaterna har ltit gra ngon referensunderskning av miljns tillstnd fr att drigenom understdja arbetet med att utforma programmen och stta upp ml fr dem.
As the EEA has recently reported, ‘Links between agriculture as an important driving force and environmental pressures are diverse and complex. 
Som miljbyrn nyligen skrev r frbindelserna mellan jordbruket som en viktig drivkraft och ptryckningar p miljomrdet mngfacetterade och komplexa.
There is relatively little data available at a European level to provide an objective view of changing pressures on the rural environment. 
Det finns relativt lite information p europeisk niv fr att man skall kunna f en objektiv bild av det frnderliga trycket p landsbygdsmiljn.
Although work is progressing on agri-environment indicators within the European Union and the OECD as well as at national level, they have yet to be applied in a systematic way’ (2). 
Arbetet gr visserligen framt vad gller indikatorer p jordbruksmiljfrgor svl inom EU och OECD som p nationell niv, men dessa indikatorer behver ocks tillmpas systematiskt (2).
The failure to develop environmental indicators on the basis of which the impact of the programmes could be quantified was an additional factor undermining the work of evaluation. This problem has been recognised clearly by the Commission and the 1 (2) Ibid., p. 
En annan faktor som har frsvrat utvrderingsarbetet r att man inte har utvecklat miljindikatorer utifrn vilka programmens inverkan skulle kunna mtas. Detta problem har kommissionen och medlemsstaterna uttryckligen bekrftat.
In its summary report of Member State evaluations the Commission states, ‘There has been comparatively little progress in developing indicators which are applicable to the evaluation of agri-environment policies ... . In conclusion, indicator selection to monitor environmental impacts is essential to the success of any evaluation programme. 
I kommissionens sammanfattning av medlemsstaternas utvrderingar sgs: Relativt f framsteg har gjorts med att utveckla lmpliga indikatorer fr utvrdering av miljprogrammen fr jordbruket. Valet av indikatorer fr vervakning av miljinverkan r i slutndan ytterst viktigt fr att ett utvrderingsprogram skall kunna bli framgngsrikt.
Indicators must be relevant to the programme and its area of application. 
Indikatorerna mste vara relevanta fr programmet och dess tillmpningsomrde.
A pre-condition of selecting useful indicators is that programme objectives must be specific and clear; having vague objectives is likely to present great difficulties in terms of monitoring impacts’ (3). 
En ndvndig frutsttning fr att lmpliga indikatorer skall kunna vljas r att programmets ml r konkreta och tydliga Đ vaga ml gr det sannolikt mycket svrare att flja upp inverkan (3).
The development of appropriate indicators is essential, if future environment-oriented expenditure within the agriculture policy domain is to achieve value for money. 
Det r mycket viktigt att lmpliga indikatorer utvecklas, om framtida miljinriktade utgifter inom jordbrukspolitikomrdet skall kunna ge valuta fr pengarna.
As the report produced for the European Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control by Professor Stefan Tangermann, concludes, ‘To deal with all these matters will require indicators of: resource protection for soil, water and atmosphere; of the extent and health of natural and semi-natural habitats; of bio-diversity presumably on both farmed land and in field boundaries and land surrounding agriculture; landscape features and landscape change; historical and heritage features’ (4). 
Som det konstateras i en rapport som utarbetats av professor Stefan Tangermann fr Europaparlamentets budgetkontrollutskott: Fr att man skall kunna hantera alla dessa frgor krvs indikatorer p skyddet av resurser i marken, vattnet och luften, frekomsten av och hlsotillstndet i naturliga och delvis naturliga biotoper, den biologiska mngfalden p bde jordbruksmark, mark som grnsar till krar och mark som omger jordbruk, landskapskarakteristika och frndringar av landskapet samt historia och kulturarv (4).
There are currently significant gaps in agri-environmental knowledge, for example, ‘For want of adequate analyses it is impossible at present to assess the presence and scope of the residues of numerous pesticides likely to have adverse effects on health’ (5). 
Det finns fr nrvarande betydande luckor i kunskapen om miljfrgor inom jordbruket. Exempelvis r det i syfte att gra tillfredsstllande analyser fr nrvarande omjligt att bedma frekomsten av och mngden restprodukter av mnga bekmpningsmedel som sannolikt r skadliga fr hlsan (5).
At Member State level, in the United Kingdom, the national parliament’s Public Accounts Committee concluded on the basis of NAO evidence, ‘We are dismayed that, 10 years after the start of the scheme, the Ministry have still not developed an adequate set of measurable targets for judging the success of the scheme’ (6). 
P medlemsstatsniv konstaterade det brittiska parlamentets utskott fr offentliga utgifter, p grundval av uppgifter frn NAO, fljande: Vi r bestrta ver att departementet tio r efter det att ordningen infrdes nnu inte har utvecklat ngon adekvat uppsttning mtbara ml fr bedmning av hur framgngsrik ordningen r (6).
In Sweden, the SNAO found ‘our audit shows that only a very limited evaluation can be made of the effects of environmental grants where the conservation of biological diversity is con-cerned... . 
I Sverige noterade Riksrevisionsverket fljande: ÓVr granskning visar att utvrdering av miljstdets effekter r mjlig endast i liten utstrckning nr det gller bevarandet av biologisk mngfald...
This means that the Government lacks, to a great extent, (3) European Commission (DG VI. 
Detta innebr att statsmakterna i hg grad saknar (3) Europeiska kommissionen (GD VI.
F. II.1), ‘State of application of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92; evaluation of agri-environment programmes’, 4 Working Document VI/7655/98, 25.11.1998, pp. 33 and 34. () European Parliament, ‘The purpose and methodology of evaluation in regard to EU agricultural expenditure’, PE 168.019, BUDG 102-EN, 5 p. 
F. II.1), ÓState of application of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92; Evaluation of Agri-environment Pro-4 grammesÓ, Arbetsdokument VI/7655/98, 25.11.1998, s. 33Đ34. () Europaparlamentet, ÓThe purpose and methodology of evaluation in regard to EU agricultural expenditureÓ, PE 168.019, BUDG 102-EN, 5 s.
The UK’s Environmentally Sensitive Areas programme was established within the context of Council Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 (OJ L 93, 30.3.1985, pp. 1 to 18), which provided for limited co-financing by the Community of national agri-environmental measures within the context of EAGGF-Guidance. 
Det brittiska programmet fr miljmssigt knsliga omrden inrttades inom ramen fr rdets frordning 797/85 (EGT L 93, 30.3.1985, s 1Đ18), enligt vilken gemenskapen i begrnsad omfattning skall samfinansiera nationella miljtgrder inom jordbruket inom ramen fr EUGFJ:s utvecklingssektion.
C 353/32 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.12.2000 the basic data it needs to make choices between different environmental measures’ (1). 
58. C 353/32 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.12.2000 underlag fr avvgning mellan olika miljtgrderÓ (1).
The EEA has noted as a weakness of AE policy implementation, that ‘there was no comprehensive evaluation or monitoring of results’ (2). There were, however, some exceptions to this general failure; such as the Bavarian Ministry of Environment’s VNP programme, which was supported by a good baseline survey. 
Miljbyrn har konstaterat en brist i genomfrandet av politiken fr miljprogram inom jordbruket, nmligen att det inte gjorts ngon omfattande utvrdering eller uppfljning av resultaten (2) Vissa undantag frn denna allmnna underltenhet har dock ptrffats; ett exempel r det bayerska miljdepartementets VNP-program, som underbyggs av en god referensunderskning.
Commission follow-up 86. 
Kommissionens uppfljning 86.
The basic regulations for both AE and AF required the Commission to report to the Council and the European Parliament on the application of these measures within three years of their adoption and implementation (3). 
Enligt grundfrordningarna fr bde milj-och beskogningsprogrammen skulle kommissionen avge en rapport till rdet och Europaparlamentet om genomfrandet av tgrderna senast tre r efter det att frordningarna trdde i kraft respektive brjade genomfras (3).
This reporting was duly carried out in late 1997 (4). However, neither of the ‘application reports’ presented constitutes an evaluation. 
Kommissionen avgav i vederbrlig ordning rapporter i slutet av 1997 (4), men ingen av de bda tillmpningsrap-porterna i frga kan sgas utgra ngon utvrdering.
With regard to AE, the Commission has both carried out its own study of policy impact and produced a report summarising the results of Member States’ evaluations. 
Nr det gller miljprogrammen har kommissionen gjort bde en egen studie av tgrdernas inverkan och en sammanfattning av resultaten av medlemsstaternas utvrderingar.
The Commission’s own study examined AE measures at programme level in a wide range of Member States. 
I kommissionens egen studie granskades olika tgrder p programniv i en lng rad medlemsstater.
This evaluation, performed by external expert consultants on behalf of the Commission, identifies many of the same shortcomings as highlighted by the Court in this report. 
I denna utvrdering, som genomfrts av externa sakkunniga konsulter fr kommissionens rkning, pvisas mnga av de brister som revisionsrtten uppmrksammar i denna rapport.
The Court welcomes the development of an ‘evaluation culture’ in the Commission and Member States with regard to AE programmes. 
Revisionsrtten vlkomnar utvecklingen av en utvrderingskultur inom kommissionen och medlemsstaterna vad gller miljprogrammen fr jordbruket.
Although trees planted in the 1990s will not be mature until decades in the future, nevertheless evaluation is necessary now in order to verify that AF is proceeding as foreseen, for example to verify that trees are being planted in the places of greatest environmental need. 
Frvisso kommer de trd som har planterats under 1990-talet inte att bli mogna p flera decennier, men man mste nd utvrdera tgrderna redan nu fr att skerstlla att de fortskrider som planerat, exempelvis genom att kontrollera att trd planteras p de platser dr miljbehoven r strst.
Member State follow-up 89. 
Medlemsstaternas uppfljning 89.
At Member State level, the analysis of AE policy impact has been mixed. 
P medlemsstatsniv har analysen av miljprogrammens inverkan varit av vxlande kvalitet.
For example, in Germany three regions have pro-(1) SNAO, op. cit., pp. 9 to 11. 
I Tyskland har exempelvis tre (1) Riksrevisionsverket, op. cit., s. 9Đ11.
(2) European Environment Agency, ‘Environment in the European Union 3 at the turn of the century’, Copenhagen, 1999, p. 
(2) Europeiska miljbyrn, Miljn i Europeiska unionen vid sekelskiftet, 3 Kpenhamn, 1999, s.
306. () Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 in respect of AE. 
306. () Fr miljprogrammen: artikel 10 i frordning (EEG) nr 2078/92.
4 Article 8 of Regulation 2080/92 in respect of AF. () Regarding AE, see European Commission, COM(97) 620 final, 4.12.1997; regarding AF, see European Commission, COM(97) 630 final, 28.11.1997. duced impressive evaluation studies; but 22 programmes have not yet been evaluated. 
Fr 4 beskogningsprogrammen: artikel 8 i frordning 2080/92. () Fr miljprogrammen: se Europeiska kommissionen, KOM(97) 620 slutlig, 4.12.1997; fr beskogningsprogrammen: se Europeiska kommissionen, KOM(97) 630 slutlig, 28.11.1997. regioner gjort imponerande utvrderingar, men 22 program har fortfarande inte utvrderats.
In Italy, environmental evaluations have yet to be performed by three regions. 
I Italien har man i tre regioner nnu inte gjort ngra miljutvrderingar.
The Member State and Commission’s assertion that this programme is responsible for increasing groundwater levels, is unsupported by empirical evidence. 
Medlemsstaternas och kommissionens pstende att programmet har orsakat en hjning av grundvattennivn r inte underbyggt med empiriska bevis.
In fact, a five-year drought in Spain ended in 1996, and this is the likely cause of increased groundwater levels. 
I sjlva verket tog en fem r lng torka i Spanien slut 1996, och detta r den troliga orsaken till hjda grundvattenniver.
Furthermore, in Luxembourg and in several regions in other Member States the Commission has noted that ‘there appears to have been a considerable lack of commitment to evaluation’ (5). 
Dessutom har kommissionen konstaterat att det i Luxemburg och i andra medlemsstater tycks finnas en betydande brist p engagemang i utvrderingar (5).
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 90. 
SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 90.
The importance of environmental considerations within agricultural policy is set to increase further over time. 
Miljvervgandena vntas f en allt mer framtrdande plats inom jordbrukspolitiken.
The Commission’s major policy direction document, ‘Agenda 2000: For a stronger and wider Union’, notes ‘The integration of environmental goals into the CAP and the development of the roles farmers can and should play in terms of management of natural resources and landscape conservation are another increasingly important objective for the CAP... . 
I sitt viktiga policydokument ÓAgenda 2000: En frstrkt och utvidgad unionÓ sger kommissionen fljande: ÓIntegreringen av miljml i den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken och utvecklingen av den roll som jordbrukarna kan och br spela i frvaltningen av naturtillgngar och i arbetet fr att bevara landskapet r andra allt viktigare ml i den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken...
The measures aimed at maintaining and enhancing the quality of the environment shall be reinforced and extended’ (6). 
Miljvrden kommer att frstrkas och utvidgasÓ(6).
Currently an amount of ECU 2 800 million per annum is mentioned in the budget evaluation of Agenda 2000 for the accompanying measures (7). 
I budgetprognosen i Agenda 2000 nmns fr nrvarande beloppet 2,8 miljarder ecu per r fr de kompletterande tgrderna (7).
However, with the 1992 reform, the Community may have succeeded in ‘greening’ its CAP but not necessarily agriculture. 
Med reformen 1992 kanske gemenskapen lyckades gra den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken grnare men inte ndvndigtvis jordbruket.
The expected environmental benefits of the changes made by the reform of 1992 to the common organisations of the market (COMs), are not yet realised to a significant extent, as the European Environment Agency’s assessment of the current state of the rural environment makes clear (see paragraph 7). 
De miljmssiga frdelar som man vntade sig tack vare de ndringar i de gemensamma organisationerna av marknaden som gjordes genom 1992 rs GJP-reform har hittills inte i ngon avsevrd grad kunnat uppns, vilket tydliggrs i Europeiska miljbyrns bedmning av nulget vad gller miljn p landsbygden (se punkt 7).
In the arable sector, area aid is still providing incentives for production 5 () European Commission (DG VI. F. II.1), ‘State of application of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92; evaluation of agri-environment programmes’, 6 Working Document VI/7655/98, 25.11.1998, p. 
Inom sektorn fr jordbruksgrdor motiverar arealstdet fortfarande jordbrukarna att anvnda (5) Europeiska kommissionen (GD VI. F. II.1), ÓState of application of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92; Evaluation of Agri-environment Pro-6 grammesÓ, Arbetsdokument VI/7655/98, 25.11.1998, s.