natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the absence of a clear definition of the concepts of Ôagricultural communityŐ and Ôfair standard of livingŐ, the Court commissioned an expert (2) with a view to clarifying the meaning of these concepts, which are important for an evaluation of the CommissionŐs statistical tools. 
I brist p en tydlig definition av begreppen ÓjordbruksbefolkningÓ och Ósklig levnadsstandardÓ har revisionsrtten uppdragit t en sakkunnig (2) att utreda innebrden av dessa begrepp som r viktiga fr utvrderingen av kommissionens statistiska verktyg.
The results of the expertŐs appraisal are summarised in the Annex. 
Resultaten av sakkunnigutltandet sammanfattas i en bilaga.
Impact of the interpretation of Article 33 on the CommissionŐs statistical tools 66. 
Konsekvenser av tolkningen av artikel 33 fr kommissionens statistiska verktyg 66.
The interpretation of Article 33(1)(b) of the EC Treaty establishes the following criteria for the development of the CommissionŐs statistical tools: the standard of living in the agricultural sector is not fair when all the disposable incomes of all the members of the farming household together fall below a certain threshold, which must be established, at the political level, in relation to other entrepreneurial households. 
Tolkningen av artikel 33.1b i EG-frdraget pbjuder fljande kriterier fr utarbetandet av kommissionens statistiska verktyg: inom jordbrukssektorn r levnadsstandarden inte sklig nr samtliga disponibla inkomster fr samtliga medlemmar av jordbrukshushllet understiger en srskild niv som skall faststllas genom politiska beslut och i frhllande till andra fretagarhushll.
In order to give an opinion on the question of the fairness of agricultural incomes, the Commission must therefore have relevant information on the overall disposable income of individual agricultural households and the households of comparable entrepreneurs. 
Fr att ta stllning i frgan om i jordbruksinkomsternas sk-lighet mste kommissionen frfoga ver relevant information om de enskilda jordbrukshushllens totala inkomster och andra jmfrbara fretagares hushll.
It also needs this information to be able to study the other sources of farmersŐ incomes or the distribution of incomes within the farming sector. 
Kommissionen behver ven denna information fr att kunna studera jordbrukarnas vriga inkomstkllor och frdelningen av inkomsterna inom jordbrukssektorn.
(1) Hill, loc.cit. p. 
(1) Hill, a.a, s.
(2) Professor Stephan von Cramon of the University of Gttingen. 
(2) Professor Stephan von Cramon, Gttingens universitet.
Evaluation of the pertinence of the CommunityŐs statistical tools 67. 
Utvrdering av relevansen hos Europeiska gemenskapens statistiska verktyg 67.
The Court examined the statistical tools applied by the Commission and in the Member States in order to verify, in particular, whether these tools allow conclusions to be drawn in respect of the fairness of the standard of living of the agricultural community. 
Revisionsrtten har granskat de statistiska verktyg som anvnts av kommissionen och i medlemsstaterna fr att se om dessa verktyg gr det mjligt att dra ngra slutsatser om huruvida jordbruksbefolkningens levnadsstandard r sklig.
The Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) 68. 
Informationssystemet fr jordbruksfretagens redovisningsuppgifter (ISJR) 68.
As agricultural holdings are classified, under the European typology, according to their size, region and activity, a differentiated analysis is also possible. 
Eftersom jordbruksfretagen i enlighet med den europeiska typologin klassificeras utifrn storlek, region och verksamhet, r det ocks mjligt att gra en differentierad analys.
The extensive farm returns control programme, which has been accessible on the Internet since 2002 (data for the financial year 2000) and guarantees a precise control over the data, is another positive aspect. 
Det omfattande programmet fr kontroll av fretagsredovis-ningar, som r tillgngligt p Internet sedan 2002 (uppgifter frn budgetret 2000) och som garanterar en exakt kontroll av uppgifterna, r ocks positivt.
The FADN is based, however, on holdings and not on households. 
ISJR hnfr sig dock till fretagen och inte till hushl-len.
Moreover, only income from agricultural activities is entered in the FADN accounts. Other sources of income are ignored completely. Figure 4 shows that, in 12 Member States out of 15, income generated by agricultural activity as such accounts for at least half the total income of agricultural households in the narrow sense of the term. 
Dessutom bokfrs i ISJR endast de inkomster som hrrr frn jordbruket. vriga inkomstkllor frbigs helt. I figur 4 visas att i tolv av femton medlemsstater utgrs minst hlften av den totala inkomsten fr jordbrukshushll i strikt bemrkelse av inkomst frn den egentliga jordbruksverksamheten.
However, in nine Member States agricultural households only draw between 25 % and 60 % of their income from agricultural activity. 
I nio medlemsstater fr jord-brukshllen dock endast mellan 25 och 60 % av sin inkomst frn jordbruksverksamheten.
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union Figure 4 Farm income as a percentage of total income of farm households C 45/17 Source of narrow definition: Eurostat, Income of the agricultural households sector - 2001 Report, Luxembourg 2002. 
20.2.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning Figur 4 Jordbruksinkomsternas procentandel av jordbrukshushllens totala inkomster C 45/17 Klla fr strikt bemrkelse: Eurostat, Inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn Đ Rapport 2001, Luxemburg 2002.
The figures for Sweden, Spain and Portugal include income from independent agricultural and non-agricultural activities. 
Sifferuppgifterna fr Sverige, Spanien och Portugal inbegriper inkomster frn sjlvstndig jordbruksverksamhet och sjlvstndig icke-jordbruksverksamhet.
Source of broad definition: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Working Party on Agricultural Policies and Markets: Synthesis report on farm household income issues in OECD countries (AGR/CA/API(2002)11/Final), 29.10.2002, p. 
Klla fr vid bemrkelse: Organisationen fr ekonomiskt samarbete och utveckling, arbetsgrupp om jordbrukspolitik och jordbruksmark-nad: sammanfattande rapport om jordbrukshushllens inkomster i OECD-lnderna (AGR/CA/API (2002)11 slutlig), av den 29 oktober 2002, s.
In order to distinguish between agricultural households and other households, the OECD uses the definitions adopted by Eurostat: in the narrow sense of the term, an agricultural household is a household where agriculture is the main source of income of the reference person Ń as a general rule, the head of the household. 
Fr att skilja mellan jordbrukshushll och andra hushll anvnder OECD de definitioner som har faststllts av Eurostat: i strikt bemrkelse r ett jordbrukshushll ett hushll dr referenspersonen Đ vanligtvis familjefrsrjaren Đ har jordbruket som sin frmsta inkomstklla.
In the broad sense of the term, on the other hand, all households are considered to be agricultural households where at least one member draws some income from an independent agricultural activity (European Commission, ÔIncome of the Agricultural Households SectorŐ, 1999 report, Luxembourg, p. 8). 
I vid bemrkelse dremot r jordbrukshushll alla hushll dr minst en medlem fr viss inkomst frn sjlvstndig jordbruksverksamhet (Europeiska kommissionen, Inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn, rapport 1999, Luxemburg, s. 8).
In practice, this means that the FADN only covers 65 % of all farmers in the Community. 
I praktiken innebr detta att ISJR endast tcker 65 % av samtliga jordbrukare i Europeiska gemenskapen.
As the economic size threshold for the holdings is not always the same, this rate varies considerably from one Member State to another: while the FADN only covers 41,9 % of Austrian farmers, the rate covered in Ireland comes to 87,9 % (1). 
Grnsen fr jordbruksfretagens ekonomiska storlek r inte alltid densamma, vilket innebr stora variationer mellan medlemsstaterna: i sterrike tcker ISJR endast 41,9 % av jordbrukarna medan 87,9 % tcks i Irland (1).
(1) http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rica/methodology2_en.cfm. 71. 
(1) http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rica/methodology2_en.cfm 71.
As the audit, which was carried out in a number of Member States, revealed, in contrast to the high degree of standardisation displayed by the farm returns, discrepancies still exist between the Member States with regard to population size, the procedures for selecting representative samples and the selection of new holdings for inclusion. 
Som framgr av granskningen som gjorts i vissa medlemsstater, kvarstr skillnader mellan medlemsstaterna som pverkar mjligheterna att gra jmfrelser vad gller avgrnsning av befolkningen, tillvgagngssttet fr att gra ett representativt stickprov och vlja ut nya jordbruksfretag, vilket str i kontrast mot den hga nivn av harmonisering av fretagsredovisning-arna.
C 45/18 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 agriculture. If the holdings are organised on a different legal basis, if the household is made up of several professionally active persons or the farmer has sources of income other than agriculture, the FADNŐs Ôfamily farm incomeŐ does not give an accurate indication of disposable income. 
C 45/18 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 jordbruksfretaget r av annan juridisk form, om jordbrukshushllet bestr av flera personer som r yrkesverksamma eller om fretagaren har andra inkomstkllor n jordbruket, ger inkomsten fr familjejordbruket i ISJR inte ngon exakt indikation om jordbrukshushllens disponibla inkomst.
The Economic Accounts for Agriculture (EAA) 73. 
Rkenskaper fr jordbruket (EAA) 73.
As the first estimate for the EAA is published before the end of the reporting year, one of its great advantages is that it provides results that are available quickly. 
Den frsta uppskattningen av EAA offentliggjordes fre slutet p det budgetr som rapporten avsg. En av de stora frdelarna med EAA r allts att resultaten snabbt blir tillgngliga.
However, the income aggregates and indicators used are not indicators of farmersŐ total incomes or their disposable incomes, as they may have sources of income other than agricultural production. 
Dock r de aggregat och indikatorer som anvnds inom ramen fr EAA inte ngra indikatorer fr vare sig jordbrukarnas totala inkomst eller deras disponibla inkomst, eftersom jordbrukarna kan ha andra inkomstkllor n jordbruksproduktionen.
The agricultural incomes calculated in the context of the EAA must therefore, under no circumstances, be taken as the equivalent of the total earnings of the farmers or the farm households. 
Den jordbruksinkomst som berknas inom ramen fr EAA kan drfr inte vara samma sak som jordbrukarnas eller jordbrukshushllens totala inkomst.
In addition, it should be borne in mind that the figures forwarded are average values, which give no indication of the distribution of incomes. 
Dessutom r det lmpligt att ta i beaktande att de siffror som meddelas r medelvrden som inte ger ngon indikation om frdelningen av inkomsterna.
If, in addition, one bears in mind that the denominator used to calculate indicators A and B (see Figure 2), i.e. the annual work unit (1), has not been completely standardised, it is impossible to compare incomes in absolute terms between the Member States. 
Om man fr vrigt beaktar att den nmnare som anvnds i berkningen av indikatorerna A och B (se figur 2), det vill sga rsverket (1), inte r helt enhetlig, blir det omjligt att gra en jmfrelse mellan inkomsterna i medlemsstaterna i absoluta tal.
Only changes within each Member State can be compared. 
Endast utvecklingen inom varje enskild medlemsstat kan jmfras.
No conclusions should thus be drawn concerning the absolute value of the incomes. 
Det r drfr lmpligt att inte dra ngon slutsats om inkomsternas absoluta vrde.
For this reason Eurostat has refused for some years to draw such conclusions and has confined itself to a comparison of changes in incomes observed within the various Member States (2). 
Av denna anledning avstr Eurostat sedan flera r frn att gra det och jmfr endast utvecklingen av de inkomster som iakttagits i de olika medlemsstaterna (2).
The Income of the Agricultural Households Sector (IAHS) 76. 
Inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn 76.
Net disposable income calculated using the IAHS offers the advantage that it is not based on agricultural products or the holding but on the household. In addition, it allows various other sources of income to be taken into consideration, in addition to income from capital. 
Den disponibla nettoinkomsten berknad enligt inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn har den frdelen att den inte grundar sig p jordbruksprodukter eller p fretaget, utan p hushllet. Dessutom r det med detta projekt mjligt att Đ frutom inkomster av kapital Đ beakta olika inkomstkllor.
(2) See previous situation: European Commission, Income from agricultural activity in 1998, Luxembourg, 1999, Chapter 6, p. 
(2) Se tidigare statistik: Europeiska kommissionen, Inkomst frn jordbruksverksamhet 1998, Luxemburg, 1999, rubrik 6, s.
The IAHS has never achieved reliable and comparable results, however, because of technical and financial obstacles and because the Commission and a number of Member States do not give it high priority. CONCLUSION 78. 
Projektet om inkomsterna fr jordbrukshushllssektorn har dock aldrig lett till tillfrlitliga och jmfrbara resultat p grund av tekniska och ekonomiska hinder och det faktum att kommissionen och flera medlemsstater inte anser projektet vara prioriterat.
When subjected to closer scrutiny, it is apparent that these three instruments have not been designed for the same purposes. 
Vid en nrmare granskning blir det tydligt att dessa tre verktyg inte har skapats fr samma ndaml.
The EAA is used for calculating surplus income in relation to the costs of all agricultural products. 
EAA tjnar till att berkna verskottet av inkomster i frhllande till kostnaderna fr samtliga jordbruksprodukter.
The aim of the FADN is to calculate the income earned by agricultural holdings managed on a professional basis. 
Syftet med ISJR r att berkna vilken inkomst som tas ut av professionellt drivna jordbruksfretag.
The FADN and the EAA do not provide any direct information on the standard of living of the agricultural community (Article 33(1)(b) of the EU Treaty). 
ISJR och EAA ger inte ngon direkt information om jordbruksbefolkningens levnadsstandard (artikel 33.1b i EG-frdraget).
However, this project has never produced reliable and comparable results. 
Detta projekt har dock aldrig gett tillfrlitliga och jmfrbara resultat.
The Commission should evaluate the statistics available at present concerning the situation of holdings and agricultural households and then define precisely the statistical framework it requires to monitor achievement of the objectives of the CAP, in particular those set out in Article 33 of the EC Treaty. 
Kommissionen br utvrdera den nu aktuella statistiken om jordbruksfretagens och jordbrukshushllens situation, och sedan exakt faststlla det statistiska ramverk som behvs fr att kontrollera genomfrandet av mlen fr den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, i synnerhet i artikel 33 i EG-frdraget.
The FADN measures the incomes of agricultural holdings. For the results to allow comparison between the various Member States, the Commission has devised numerous rules governing the content of the data, the controls on them and the calculation of indicators. 
Fr att det skall g att jmfra resultaten mellan de olika medlemsstaterna har kommissionen skapat mnga regler fr vad uppgifterna skall innehlla, hur de skall kontrolleras och hur indikatorer skall berknas.
However, the room for manoeuvre is so large that the differences between the Member States may impair the comparability of the results. 
Manverutrymmet r dock sdant att skillnaderna mellan medlemsstaterna kan pverka resultatens jmfrbarhet.
The Court recommends that a multi-disciplinary group should be set up to review these differences, evaluate them and propose the necessary improvements. 
Revisionsrtten rekommenderar att det upprttas en tvrvetenskaplig grupp som gr en berkning av dessa skillnader, utvrderar dem och freslr ndvndiga frbttringar.
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/19 82. 
20.2.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 45/19 82.
The EEA are based on various types of sources depending on the Member States. As the origin and quality vary from one Member State to the other, the Court recommends that the transparency of the data should be improved by drawing up an inventory and introducing standardised controls. 
EAA baseras p olika sorters kllor beroende p medlemsstat. Eftersom ursprung och kvalitet varierar mellan medlemsstaterna, rekommenderar revisionsrtten att uppgifternas genomskinlighet frbttras genom att en inventariefrteckning upprttas och standardiserade granskningar infrs.
In addition, it would be very useful if the user of the EAA could form an opinion of the quality of the data with the help of precise statistical indicators. 
Dessutom skulle det vara mycket bra om de som anvnder EAA kunde bilda sig en uppfattning om uppgifternas kvalitet med hjlp av indikatorer fr statistisk exakthet.
With regard to the IAHS, the Commission should evaluate the project and decide under what conditions it can be pursued. 
Vad gller inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn br kommissionen gra en utvrdering av projektet och besluta om frutsttningarna fr dess fortsttning.
The Court recommends that the Commission should opt for a uniform approach, either macroeconomic or microeco-nomic, on the basis of prior definition by the Commission of the statistical information which it absolutely must have if it is to monitor achievement of a fair standard of living for the agricultural community. 
Revisionsrtten rekommenderar att man fresprkar ett enhetligt arbetsstt, antingen makroekonomiskt eller mikroekonomiskt utifrn en preliminr bedmning frn kommissionen om vilken statistisk information kommissionen behver fr att kontrollera att man uppnr mlet som r en sklig levnadsstandard fr jordbruksbefolkningen.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at the Court meeting of 4 December 2003. 
Denna rapport har antagits av revisionsrtten vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 4 december 2003.
C 45/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 ANNEX MAIN CONCLUSIONS OF THE EXPERT APPRAISAL CONCERNING THE INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 33 OF THE EC TREATY 1. 
C 45/20 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 BILAGA HUVUDSAKLIGA SLUTSATSER I SAKKUNNIGUTLTANDE OM TOLKNINGEN AV INNEHLLET I ARTIKEL 33 I EG-F RDRAGET 1.
First of all, it appeared necessary to look at the question of the fairness of the standard of living in terms of a comparison with a given level (1). 
Det har framfr allt visat sig vara ndvndigt att jmfra sklig-heten i levnadsstandarden med en given niv (1).
This approach presupposes that we: (a) define the subject of the comparison - the standard of living; (b) identify the target group; specify whose standard of living is to be measured; (c) identify a reference group whose standard of living will serve as a benchmark; (d) establish a threshold below which the standard of living can no longer be considered ÔfairŐ. 
Genom detta frfarande skall man a) definiera fremlet fr jmfrelsen Đ levnadsstandard, b) avgrnsa mlgruppen, precisera vems levnadsstandard som skall mtas, c) utse en referensgrupp vars levnadsstandard skall tjna som jmfrelse-kriterium, och d) faststlla en trskel under vilken levnadsstandarden inte lngre kan anses vara ÓskligÓ.
The considerations summarised below are based on published literature as well as the expert appraisal carried out for the Court. 
De vervganden som sammanfattas nedan stder sig p publicerad litteratur samt p sakkunnigutltandet som gjorts fr revisionsrtten.
The subject of the comparison: Ôthe standard of livingŐ 3. 
Fremlet fr jmfrelsen: ÓlevnadsstandardÓ 3.
ÔStandard of livingŐ is a concept of social well-being. 
Levnadsstandard r ett begrepp fr socialt vlstnd.
The quality of life is derived from consumption, or in this case, from potential consumption. 
Livskvalitet hrleds frn konsumtion, i detta fall den potentiella konsumtionen.
The latter comes from the aggregation of two variables Ń income and wealth. 
Den potentiella konsumtionen fr man fram genom att lgga samman tv storheter Đ inkomst och frmgenhet.
Potential consumption, associated with the environment and personal factors such as health, gives the individual standard of living (see Figure below) (2). 
Den potentiella konsumtionen, som r knuten till milj och personliga faktorer, till exempel hlsa, visar den individuella levnadsstandarden (se figur nedan) (2).
Figure Factors which affect the standard of living Source: Prof. Stephan von Cramon, Department of Agricultural Economics, Gttingen University. 
Figur Faktorer som pverkar levnadsstandarden Klla: Prof. Stephan von Cramon, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Gttingen.
(1) Professor Stephan von Cramon, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Gttingen, Aspects of the CommissionŐs Management of the ÔFair Standards of LivingŐ Treaty Objective, p. 
(1) Professor Stephan von Cramon, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Gttingen, Aspects of the CommissionŐs Management of the ÓFair Standards of LivingÓ Treaty Objective, s.
(2) von Cramon, loc. cit. p. 6 ff. 
(2) von Cramon, a.a, s. 6 f.
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/21 4. 
20.2.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 45/21 4.
Defined in this way, a personŐs Ôstandard of livingŐ is very difficult to measure in practice. 
Levnadsstandard definierad p detta stt r mycket svr att mta i praktiken.
This is why the Court followed an approach involving the measurement of disposable income only (1). 
Det r drfr revisionsrtten har valt ett frfarande som bestr av att endast den disponibla inkomsten mts (1).
The target group: Ôthe agricultural communityŐ 5. 
Mlgruppen: ÓjordbruksbefolkningenÓ 5.
Given that Ôstandard of livingŐ and Ôdisposable incomeŐ can only concern natural persons or groups of persons, the holding cannot be used as a reference unit in the comparison. 
Med tanke p att levnadsstandarden och den disponibla inkomsten endast kan berra en fysisk person eller en grupp personer, kan fretaget inte tjna som referens i jmfrelsen.
The choice of the household as the unit is justified by the fact that, in agricultural households, incomes are generally pooled and that the members of the household take decisions on consumption together. 
Valet av hushll berttigas av det faktum att man i jordbrukshushllen i allmnhet delar p inkomsterna och att medlemmarna av hushllet tillsammans fattar beslut om konsumtion.
The reference unit for the comparison must therefore be the household and not the individual farmer (2). 
Referensenheten fr jmfrelsen br allts vara hushllet och inte den enskilde jordbrukaren (2).
In accordance with the two criteria most often used for this purpose (income and working time), an occupation is held to be agricultural where agriculture constitutes the main source of income or the main activity. 
Genom att anvnda de tv kriterier som anvnds mest (inkomst och arbetstid), anses en verksamhet vara jordbruksverksamhet om jordbruket utgr den frmsta inkomstkl-lan eller den strsta delen av verksamheten.
This distinction implies the exclusion of certain agricultural populations, such as persons who carry out a farming activity as a secondary occupation or the owners of land that is leased and used for farming (3). 
Denna distinktion innebr att vissa jordbruksbefolkningar utesluts, till exempel personer som har jordbruksverksamhet som sekundr verksamhet, eller gare till utarrenderad mark som anvnds fr jordbruk (3).
The reference group 7. 
Referensgruppen 7.