natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court suggests that the Commission has allocated too few resources to the general management and administration of theIACS.ThesignificantamendmentstotheIACSlegislationin the form of Regulation (EC) No 1678/98 and Regulation (EC) No 2801/1999, following developments with regard to bovine identification and Agenda 2000 respectively, clearly demonstrate the role of clearance of accounts in both policy-setting and guidance, activities directly benefiting from its detailed and up-to-date knowledge of national implementation. 
Till fljd av utvecklingen inom ntkreatursidentifie-ring och Agenda 2000 infrdes betydande ndringar av ISAK-lagstiftningen genom frordningarna (EG) nr 1678/98 och (EG) nr 2801/1999. Detta visar klart vilken roll som rkenskapsavslut-ningenspelarfrutformningenavbdepolitikochriktlinjer,dr kommissionen direkt utnyttjar sin detaljerade och uppdaterade kunskap om tillmpningen nationellt.
The abovementioned significant amendments to the IACS legislation furthermore necessitated a whole series of interpretations and guidance issued by the Commission to all Member States, whichhasbeengiventotheCourt. 
Nmnda viktiga ndringar av ISAK-lagstiftningen ledde dessutom till att kommissionen utfrdade en rad tolkningar och riktlinjer fr medlemsstaterna som ven tillstllts revisionsrtten.
Moreover, audit observations letters sent to Member States systematically make extensive recommendations both on regulatory compliance and on practical control. 
Revisionsanmrkningarna, som systematiskt tillstlls medlemsstaterna, innehller dessutom omfattande rekommendationer bde betrffande lagstiftningens efterlevnad och konkreta kontroller.
44. (a) The Commission requested all Member States to provide information on the tolerances for each of the methods used in 2000. Analysis of this information has shown that all Member States apply the technical tolerances at agricultural parcel level, and that Member States have adapted their maximum tolerances to those recommended by the Commission. (b) The concept of the Ôobvious errorŐ is covered by a working document already in the CourtŐs possession. 
44. a) Kommissionen anmodade alla medlemsstater att inkomma med uppgifter om toleranserna i de metoder som anvndes r 2000.Dessauppgifterharanalyseratsochslutsatsenrattalla medlemsstatertillmpardetekniskatoleransernapskiftes-niv,ochattdeharanpassatsinamaximitoleransertillvad kommissionen rekommenderat. b) Begreppet Óuppenbart misstagÓ anges nrmare i ett arbetsdokument som revisionsrtten redan har tillgng till.
An even more homogeneous approach is being developed to take account of progress made in modern technology. (c) CommissionRegulation(EEC)No3887/92andCouncilRegu-lation (EC) No 1258/1999 establish very clear obligations on Member States to recover undue payments, including those paid for earlier claim years. 
Ett mer enhetligt synstt hller p att utformas, med hnsyn tagen till modern teknisk utveckling. c) I kommissionens frordning (EEG) nr 3887/92 och rdets frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 anges klart att medlemsstaterna r frpliktigade att driva in felaktiga utbetalningar, inbegripet utbetalningar fr tidigare anskningsr.
The Commission will further see to a more consequent and uniform application by Member States. 
Kommissionen skall verka fr en mer konsekvent och enhetlig tillmpning i medlemsstaterna.
The weaknesses mentioned by the Court under points (a), (b) and (c) have been subject to a clearance-of-accounts procedure and in some cases given rise to financial corrections, whereas the other cases are still under an ongoing procedure. 
Debristersomrevisionsrttennmnerunderpunkternaa,b och c har redan blivit freml fr rkenskapsavslutning och i vissa fall lett till finansiella korrigeringar, medan vriga fall fortfarande granskas.
It is planned that the review of Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 will involve discussing with the Member States the need for a more specific provision on mutual assistance. 
Vid versynen av frordning (EEG) nr 3887/92 planeras en diskussion med medlemsstaterna om behovet av nrmare freskrifter om msesidigt bistnd.
Regulatory issues 48. 
Lagstiftningsfrgor 48.
It is possible to verify compliance with this condition by checking selected satellite images from the period 1986 to 1991, which identify land use on 31 December 1991. 
Man kan kontrollera detta villkors efterlevnad genom att granska valda satellitbilder frn 1986Đ1991, som visar markan-vndningenden31december1991.
With a view to simplifying the rules, the Commission promised, in the framework of the 1998/99 price package, to withdraw the requirement that set-aside land must have been part of the holding for two years. 
I samband med prispaketet 1998/1999 lovade kommissionen, fr att frenkla lagstiftningen, att upphva kravet p att uttagna arealer mste ha ingtt i jordbruksfretaget i tv r.
As the explanatory memorandum states, Regulation (EC) No 2490/98 was merely intended for clarification. 
Av sklen till frordning (EG) nr 2490/98 framgr att den enbart utgr ett frtydligande.
In the circumstances, it is the replacement that must be checked, since multiple application is not in itself irregular. However, the Commission appreciates the CourtŐs remark, and confirms that is has indeed paid attention to this aspect in the Member States, including those mentioned. 
Drmed blir det ersttandet som behver kontrolleras, d fleraanskningarisiginterngotolagligt.Kommissionenvl-komnarndrevisionsrttensiakttagelsehr,ochbekrftaratt denfaktisktharuppmrksammatdennaaspektimedlemssta-terna, ven i de som nmns.
C 214/36 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 52. 
C 214/36 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 31.7.2001 52.
The Commission is aware of this problem of avoiding the full effect of sanctions, and is examining the need for relevant provisions in the forthcoming consolidated Commission Regulation on the IACS. 
Kommissionen r medveten om detta problem med undvi-kandet av att pfljder fr full effekt. Den undersker huruvida freskrifter skall infras i och med att kommissionens ISAK-frordning kodifieras.
Therefore, the second yearŐs sanction is without effect and it is not feasible simply to exclude an area equal to that which was rejected in the first year. 
Drfr r det andra rets pfljd verkningsls, fr det skulle vara meningslst att infra en bestmmelse, dr en lika stor areal avvisas som under det frsta ret.
If the rejected aid application related to land that was leased in the current year, on a contract terminating at the end of the year, the sanction would be imposed on the owner (or person then entitled). 
Ń En ÓsprregelÓ skulle i mnga fall de facto drabba tredje man. rdenistdanskanavseddamarksomavvisasocksutar-renderad under det innevarande ret, och arrendeavtalet lper ut vid rets slut, skulle garen (eller motsvarande) direkt drabbas av denna pfljd.
This raises a number of legal problems. 
Detta reser flera rttsliga problem.
The Commission has already taken regulatory and guidance steps to meet its objectives of better management and control. (b) The Court is correct to say that ceilings on bovine premiums have not yet been definitively checked. 
Kommissionenharredanvidtagitlagstiftnings-ochriktlin-jetgrderfrattuppnsinamlfrbttrefrvaltningochkon- troll. b) Revisionsrtten har rtt i att taket fr ntkreatursbidraget inte har kontrollerats fullt ut.
By their nature (pay-mentscanbemadeuptotwoyearsaftertheclaimperiod) these checks can only be carried out to the required audit standard in claim year + 2. (c) Although not appearing in any formal summary report, ani-malpremiumstatisticsareevaluatedandsubjectedtorigor- ous on-the-spot audit every year, leading to numerous financial corrections under the clearance-of-accounts procedure in most Member States. 
D betalningar kan gras i upp till tvrefteranskningsperioden,kandennskaderedovis-ningsnormens kontroller i praktiken bara genomfras under Anskningsret + 2. c) ven om detta inte redovisas i ngra formella versiktsrap-porter, utvrderas statistiken ver djurbidrag varje r och blir freml fr noggrann granskning p plats, vilket vid avslutningen av rkenskaperna ger flera finansiella korrigeringar i en majoritet av medlemsstaterna.
It is regrettable that some Member States failtosupplystatisticsonrequest,butthisfailinghasbeen corrected via the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 2801/ 1999. (d) The Court observes that national certifying bodies could be usedtoanalysetheIACSimplementation. 
Det r beklagligt att vissa medlemsstaterunderlterattpbegranlmnastatistik,men denna underltenhet har tgrdats genom en ndring av frordning (EG) nr 2801/1999. d) Revisionsrtten noterar att de nationella attesterande organen kundeutnyttjasfrattanalyserahurISAKtillmpas.
However, Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 does not specifically require reporting either of the general implementation of the IACS, or of statistics in particular, because it is not directly concerned with the accounting clearance, for which the certifying bodyŐs work is used. 
De attesterande organen rapporterar om frfarandena fr att skerstllaattlagstiftningenfljs.Ifrordning(EG)nr1663/95 freskrivsdetdockinteuttryckligenomrapportingavhurISAK tillmpasgenerellt,intehelleromstatistik.Denrnmligeninte direkt relaterad till avslutningen av rkenskaperna, dr de attesterande organen anlitas.
Where Member States fail to supply some or all of the required statistics, this failing is systematically taken into account under clearance-of-accounts procedures. 
Om medlemsstaterna helt eller delvis underlter att lmna begrd statistik, beaktas denna underltenhet systematiskt vid avslutningen av rkenskaperna.
56. (b) Some Member States had an error rate of 0 %, as all cases with discrepancies after administrative controls are followed up by field inspections. (c) This reflects correctly the situation in reality and the main reason is differences among Member States and the standard of the map material they have at their disposal. (d) Similarly to point (c), differences between Member States in the detection and reporting of serious errors are often due to the varying control systems put in place. 
56. b) Vissamedlemsstaterhadeenfelfrekvensp0%,eftersomalla fall av avvikelser efter administrativa kontroller fljs upp genominspektionerpplats. c) Detta r en korrekt terspegling av den verkliga situationen ochdenviktigasteorsakenrskillnadermellanmedlemssta-terna och standarden p deras tillgngliga kartmaterial. d) I likhet med punkt c ovan beror skillnader mellan medlemsstaterna betrffande pvisande och rapportering av allvarliga fel ofta p att de fungerande kontrollsystemen r olika. Inom sektorerna fr jordbruksgrdor och djurbidrag undersks sdanaskillnaderisambandmedavslutningenavrkenska-perna. 58Đ59.
Statistics on control results (administrative and on-the-spot checks) were systematically requested from all Member States. 
Statistik ver kontrollresultat (administrativa kontroller och kontroller p plats) begrs systematiskt in frn samtliga medlemsstater.
In order to avoid very wide variations in the statistics reported for area aid, a special pre-printed questionnaire was created with detailed explanations, which the Member States have been asked to complete since 1995. 
Fr att undvika mycket stora variationer i den lmnade statistiken om arealstd, togs ett srskilt frtryckt frgeformulr fram med noggranna frklaringar, som medlemsstaterna sedan 1995 har anmodats att fylla i.
It has therefore been possible to analyse and compare the results of all Member States and to conclude that administrative controls and field inspections are being reported uniformly. 
Detta har gjort det mjligt att analysera och jmfra resultaten frn samtliga medlemsstater och faststlla att administrativa kontroller och inspektioner p plats inrapporteras p ett enhetligt stt.
The need for more attention to be paid to the specific nature of some bovine premium schemes was already addressed in 1999 andisbeingfurtherdevelopedfor2000. 
Behovet av att uppmrksamma vissa srskiljande bidragssystem frntkreaturtgrdadesredan1999,ngotsomfortsattunder 2000.
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/37 60. 
31.7.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 214/37 60.
The report on controls carried out in 1998 has been received from most Member States (Denmark, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Portugal, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom). 
Flertalet medlemsstater har inkommit med rapporten om under 1998 genomfrda kontroller (Danmark, Spanien, Frankrike, Italien, Nederlnderna, sterrike, Portugal, Finland, Sverige och Frenade kungariket).
The report on controls carried out in 1999 has been received from all Member States except Greece. 
Rapporten om kontroller genomfrda under 1999 har erhllits frn alla medlemsstater utom Grekland.
As provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2630/97 the Commission has laid down the model for the annual reports from Member States on the results of controls made in the bovine sector regarding Community provisions for identification and registration in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1898/2000 of 7 September 2000. 
I enlighet med frordning (EG) nr 2630/97 har kommissionen faststllt en frlaga fr medlemsstaternas rsrapporter, baserad p resultaten av ntkreaturssektorns kontroller avseende gemenskapsbestmmelserna om identifiering och registrering i kommissionens frord-ning(EG)nr1898/2000avden7september2000.
Evaluation of the IACS and enforcing implementation 61. 
Utvrdering av IACS och verkstllande av infrande 61.
Furthermore, accounts are not cleared until statistical information has been received and scrutinised for any shortcomings. 
Uppmrksammas br ocks att rkenskaperna inte godknns, frrn statistiska uppgifter om eventuella brister harerhllitsochgranskats.
The Commission has not so far carried out any kind of detailed cost/benefit analyses concerning implementation of the IACS. 
Kommissionen har nnu inte gjort ngon detaljerad kostnads-intktsanalys av infrandet av ISAK.
In view of the extremely high proportion of expenditure to be controlled, the Commission has been more concerned with making the IACS work, rather than with evaluating its cost-effectiveness. 
Av hnsyn till den extremt stora andelen utgifter att kontrollera, har kommissionen varit mer inriktad p att f ISAK att fungera n p att utvrdera dess kostnadseffektivitet.
Furthermore, the IACS plays a very low-key but highly effective role in the detection of aid claims for rejection in the initial stages (i.e. before they enter the system proper). 
Srskilt viktiga r de avskrckande/avhllande effekterna av ISAK:s pfljdsregler, ngot somrsvrtattkvantifiera.ISAKspelardessutomennstan omrklig, om n ytterst effektiv roll genom att p ett tidigt stadium spra och avvisa stdanskningar (dvs. innan de kommer in i sjlva systemet).
Viewing the cost-effectiveness of checks solely in financial terms is too narrow a perspective. 
Vrderar man kontrollernas kostnadseffektivitet i bara ekonomiska termer, snvar man in perspektivet.
Checks have a wider importance, in making sure that expenditure is incurred in conformity with Community legislation, thereby helping to ensure that the economic objectives of the common market organisations are achieved. 
Kontrollerna har en vidare betydelse genom att skerstlla att utgifterna pfrts i enlighet med gemenskapslagstiftningen, varmed de bidrar till att uppn de ekonomiska mlen fr de gemensamma organisationerna av marknaden.
The Court states that the Commission does not routinely report on the IACS implementation. 
Revisionsrtten hvdar att kommissionen inte rutinmssigt rapporterar om infrandet av ISAK.
It must be mentioned that there is no obligation to do so, although a report on the IACS implementation was indeed sent to the European Parliament in 1998, with subsequent updates on discharge procedures. 
Det br ppekas att den inte r frpliktigad att gra detta, ven om en rapport om infrandet av ISAK faktiskt tillstlldes Europaparlamentet 1998, och den uppdaterar denna i samband med beviljandet av ansvarsfrihet.
Of greater significance is the CommissionŐs ongoing monitoring and reporting of the IACS situation. 
Viktigare r kommissionens vervakning av och rapportering om ISAK-situationen.
The Commission takes into account the effectiveness and efficiency of the required controls, and in its observation letters regularly suggests improvements to the audited Member States. 
Kommissionen beaktar de obligatoriska kontrollernas verkan och effektivitet, och freslr i sina revisionsan-mrkningar regelbundet frbttringar fr de granskade medlemsstaterna.
The Commission agrees that, even for those Member States where the IACS has been satisfactorily implemented, weaknesses still exist and are dealt with in the context of the clearance-of-accounts procedure. 
Kommissionen instmmer i att det fortfarande finns brister ven i de medlemsstater dr ISAK har tillmpats p ett tillfredsstllande stt.
This said, it must be recalled that the clearance-of-accounts procedure is a regulatory procedure, designed to protect the interests of both Community budget and Member States. In focusing on 1998 alone, the Court does not give due weight to the ongoing nature of the clearance of accounts. 
Ppekas br ocks att avslutningen av rkenskaperna r ett lagstadgat frfarande, med syfte att vrna om bde gemenskapsbudgeten och medlemsstaterna. Genom att bara uppmrksamma 1998 tar revisionsrtten inte vederbrlig hnsyn till att avslutningen av rkenskaperna r en lpande freteelse.
The Commission welcomes the CourtŐs findings, which confirm its own. 
Kommissionen vlkomnar revisionsrttens slutsatser, som verensstmmer med vad den sjlv konstaterat.
However, the CourtŐs implication that the Commission did not analyse Member StatesŐ implementing systems in their entirety (in 1998) is misleading. 
Missledande r dock revisionsrttens antydan om att kommissionen inte fullt ut analyserat medlemsstaternas tillmpningssystem (under 1998).
Clearly, the ongoing nature of the CommissionŐs audit and supervision of the IACS does not require in-depth examination of all aspects every year. (a) Specifically for 1998, the Commission can demonstrate its preoccupation with matters other than on-the-spot checks and application of sanctions. (b) It is not considered necessary to visit every paying agency every year, hence the employment of an annual risk analysis by the Commission to determine its audit scope. 
Genom kommissionens lpande revision och vervakning av ISAK krvs uppenbart ingen ingende rlig granskning av samtliga aspekter. a) Vad gller 1998 kan kommissionen intyga att den varit mer upptagen av annat n kontroller p plats och tillmpande av pfljder. b) Det anses inte ndvndigt att varje r beska samtliga utbetalningsstllen, utan kommissionen gr i stllet en rlig riskanalys fr att bestmma revisionens omfattning.
Furthermore, these periodical and sometimes regionally-based audits always provide useful information on national implementation. 
Om en region vidavslutningavrkenskapernafaktisktblirfremlfrrevi-sionpplats,omfattardennaalltidflerar.Dessaperiodiska och ibland regionala revisioner ger dessutom alltid nyttig information om den nationella tillmpningen.
Attention was drawn to a potentially serious problem of lack of checks on forage areas in Catalonia at the time of the clearance of accounts audit of bovine premiums in September 1998, which gave rise to serious doubts regarding legitimacy of declared forage areas. 
Ett mjligen allvarligt problem med bristfllig kontroll av foderarealer i Katalonien uppmrksammades vid granskningen av ntkreatursbidragen i september 1998, och gav upphov till allvarliga tvivel om riktigheten i de deklarerade foderarealerna.
C 214/38 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 Other findings 67. 
C 214/38 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 31.7.2001 vriga granskningsresultat 67.
Potential overshooting of the regional ceilings for special beef premium is under consideration by the Commission, which is auditing this aspect in the clearance-of-accounts procedure (see alsopoint54). 
Kommissionen skrskdar om de regionala taken fr srskilda ntkttsbidrag mjligen verskridits och granskar denna aspekt i samband med avslutningen av rkenskaperna (se ven punkt 54).
THE ROLE OF MEMBER STATES Main findings at Member State level 71. (a) The Commission is aware of the differing national legal systems and practices in pursuing suspected fraud cases, but Member States are clearly under an obligation to apply the sanctions as provided in Articles 9(3) and 10 of Regulation (EEC)No3887/92. 
71. a) Kommissionen r medveten om att nationella rttsliga system och praxis skiljer sig vad gller beivrandet av fall av misstnkt bedrgeri, men medlemsstaterna r klart frpliktigade att till-lmpa pfljderna enligt artikel 9.3 och artikel 10 i frordning (EEG)nr3887/92.
The Commission must, however, take account of the principles of Community law, which among other things guarantee means of administrative or legal recourse, as appropriate. 
Kommissionen mste icke desto mindre beakta gemenskapslagstiftningens principer, som bl.a. garanterar att talan kan fras vid aktuell instans, administrativ eller rttslig.
The Commission has been asked by some Member States to create a system of objective figures to define discrepancies to which more serious sanctions should apply. 
Vissa medlemsstater har bett kommissionen att skapa ett system med objektiva avvikelsetal dr mer allvarliga pfljder skulle tillmpas.
The feasibility of this approach is currently being investigated, with a view to including a new system of penalties in the consolidated Commission Regulation on the IACS. (b) See response given at point 47. (c) The relevant veterinary and IACS legislation are interlinked; Member States may carry out combined inspections, and some of them do so. 
Denna mjlighet utreds fr nrvarande, i syfte att infra ett nytt pfljdssystem vid kodifieringen av kommissionens nya ISAK-frordning. b) Se svaret under punkt 47. c) Veterinr-och ISAK-lagstiftningen har en inbrdes koppling och medlemsstaterna kan redan kombinera inspektioner, vilket ngra ocks gr.
It should not be forgotten, however, that not all animals or stockfarmers covered by Regulation (EC) No 820/97 are subject to the IACS; efficient coordination is the responsibility of Member States. 
Man mste dock komma ihg att inte alla ntkreatur eller ÓdjurhllareÓ enligt rdets frordning (EG) nr 820/97 omfattas av ISAK och att det ligger medlemsstaterna att f ett effektivt samarbete.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusion 74. 
SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER Slutsatser 74.
The Commission has established that the basic elements of the IACS have been implemented in all Member States, with the exception of Greece and a few Spanish Autonomous Communities where the financial impact is not appreciable. 
Kommissionen har kunnat konstatera att ISAK:s grund-stomme har infrts i alla medlemsstater utom Grekland, samt vissa mindre ekonomiskt viktiga regioner i Spanien.
Every control system is perfectible, and one responsibility of the CommissionŐs auditors is to recommend improvements. 
Emellertid kan varje kontrollsystem frbttras, och ett av kommissionsrevisorernas ligganden r att fresl frbttringar.
The Commission advises Member States to integrate their controls as already allowed. 
Kommissionen rekommenderar medlemsstaterna att inte-grerasinakontroller,vilketredantilltits.
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/39 76. 
31.7.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 214/39 76.