natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Part of this was also used to increase the total budget for AMIF, of which over €115 million (i.e. more than 15 %) went to the specific allocation for integration and legal migration. 
Delar av anslagen anvndes ven till att hja Amifs totala budget, varav ver 115 miljoner euro (dvs. mer n 15 %) gick till det srskilda anslaget fr integration och laglig migration.
All AMIF programmes have been modified to reflect this increase in funding. 
Alla Amif-program har ndrats fr att terspegla de hjda anslagen.
For the second half of the programme period (2018-2020), in the context of the mid-term review of the AMIF programmes, the Commission asked Member States to reassess their needs in terms of asylum, migration and integration. 
Fr den andra hlften av programperioden (2018Đ2020), och vid halvtidsversynen av Amif-programmen, bad kommissionen medlemsstater att gra en ny bedmning av sina behov nr det gllde asyl, migration och integration.
Member States declared that they needed an additional amount of around €450 million to address the integration needs of migrants under the scope of AMIF. 
Medlemsstaterna deklarerade att de behvde ett ytterligare belopp p cirka 450 miljoner euro fr att hantera 20 integrationsbehoven hos migranter inom ramen fr Amif.
This is roughly half of the AMIF funding currently available for integration (see Figure 8). 
Det r ungefr hlften av de Amif-medel som fr nrvarande r tillgngliga fr integration (se figur 8).
According to the Commission, funding needs will be assessed regularly in the context of the annual budgetary procedures. 
Enligt kommissionen kommer finansieringsbehoven att bedmas regelbundet i samband med de rliga budgetfrfarandena.
To support Member States in evaluating their new needs and to provide assistance on how EU funds might cope with increased migration inflows, Commission staff visited Member States situated along the Western Balkans route and offered support to all Member States in the redesign of EU programmes. 
Fr att stdja medlemsstaterna nr de utvrderade sina behov och ge rd om hur EU-medel kan anvndas fr att hantera det kade infldet av migranter beskte kommissionspersonal medlemsstater lngs Vstra Balkanrutten och erbjd std till alla medlemsstater fr att ndra utformningen av EU-program.
The Commission also reminded Member States that ESIF could be used for migrant integration. 
Kommissionen pminde ven medlemsstater om att ESI-fonderna kunde anvndas fr integration av migranter.
All Member States (except Denmark which does not use AMIF) modified their national AMIF programmes to reflect the increased funding. 
Alla medlemsstater (utom Danmark som inte anvnder Amif) ndrade sina nationella Amif-program fr att terspegla den kade finansieringen.
Concerning the ESIF, Member States considered that the programmes already provided an adequate response to the new situation; only two ERDF and one EAFRD programme were modified by March 2018. 
Betrffande ESI-fonderna ansg medlemsstaterna att programmen redan tillhandahll en lmplig respons p den nya situationen, och endast tv Eruf-och ett Ejflu-program hade ndrats fram till mars 2018.
In our survey, 22 Member States declared that the allocation of funds for migrant integration changed after 2015. 
P vr enkt svarade 22 medlemsstater att anslagen av medel till integration av migranter ndrades efter 2015.
The Commission adopted an Action Plan for the integration of migrants 35. 
Kommissionen antog en handlingsplan fr integration av migranter 35.
The 2016 Commission 'Action Plan on the integration of third-country nationals' (the 'Action Plan' - see paragraph 16), strengthens the Commission’s coordinating role on integration. 
I kommissionens handlingsplan fr integration av tredjelandsmedborgare frn 2016 (handlingsplanen Đ se punkt 16) fr kommissionen en starkare samordningsroll nr det gller integration.
The Action Plan targets all migrants legally residing in the EU excluding second and third generation migrants. 
Handlingsplanen r inriktad p alla migranter som vistas lagligt i EU med undantag fr andra och tredje generationens migranter.
This initiative takes into account the Commission’s accumulated knowledge and is designed to engage all relevant stakeholders in participating in the integration process. 
Initiativet utgr frn kommissionens ackumulerade kunskap och r utformat fr att f alla relevanta aktrer att delta i integrationsprocessen.
It encompassed measures in the following areas: - Pre-departure and pre-arrival measures aiming to support migrants at the earliest point of the migration process. 
Det innehll tgrder inom fljande omrden: - tgrder fre avresan och fre ankomsten som syftar till att stdja migranter i inledningen av migrationsprocessen.
Examples are language and job-related training. - Education and training as a critical tool for successful integration. 
Exempel r sprk-och arbetsrelaterad utbildning. - Praktisk och teoretisk utbildning som ett avgrande verktyg fr att integrationen ska lyckas.
Language training is considered crucial, as well as the right to childcare and to quality education for children and increasing awareness of the laws, culture and values of the receiving society. - Employment and vocational training to support the timely and full integration of migrants in the labour market. 
Sprkutbildning ses som helt avgrande, liksom rtten till barnomsorg och kvalitetsutbildning fr barn, samt kad medvetenhet om lagar, kultur och vrden i det mottagande samhllet. - Sysselsttning och yrkesutbildning fr att stdja migranternas snabba och fullstndiga integration p arbetsmarknaden.
specific skills in the EU and its aging societies. 
Sdan utbildning kan ven hjlpa till att tillgodose behovet av specifika frdigheter i EU och dess ldrande samhllen.
Examples include facilitating the validation of skills and the recognition of qualifications. - Access to basic services such as housing and healthcare enabling migrants to start a life in a new country and to have a reasonable chance of employment. 
Exempel p tgrder r bland annat kontrollen av frdigheter och erknnandet av kvalifikationer. - Tillgng till grundlggande tjnster ssom bostder och vrd som gr det mjligt fr migranter att brja ett liv i ett nytt land och att ha en rimlig chans att f jobb.
Initiatives include providing affordable social housing, combatting the challenges of urban diversity such as geographical segregation, and mapping the health needs of migrants. - Active participation of migrants in society as a way to promote social inclusion. 
Insatser kan exempelvis vara att erbjuda subventionerade bostder och hantera utmaningarna med den urbana mngfalden i form av geografisk segregation, och att kartlgga migranternas vrdbehov. - Migranternas aktiva deltagande i samhllslivet som ett stt att frmja social delaktighet.
This can be achieved by promoting exchanges with the receiving communities through social, cultural and sports activities, by encouraging migrants to take an active role in the local, regional and national social and political environment and by fighting discrimination. - Tools for coordination, funding and monitoring. 
Detta kan uppns genom att utbyte med mottagarsamhllena frmjas genom sociala, kulturella och sportrelaterade tgrder, genom att migranter uppmanas ta en aktiv roll i den lokala, regionala och nationella sociala och politiska miljn, och genom att diskriminering bekmpas. - Verktyg fr samordning, finansiering och versyn.
The Action Plan identified 52 measures for the Commission to support Member States and other organisations in their efforts to foster migrant integration, for implementation in 2016 and 2017. 
Handlingsplanen innehll 52 tgrder, som kommissionen kunde anvnda fr att stdja medlemsstater och andra organisationer i deras anstrngningar fr att underltta migranternas integration, som skulle genomfras 2016 och 2017.
An example of a measure in the Action Plan is in Box 2. 
Ett exempel p en tgrd i handlingsplanen finns i ruta 2.
As of end December 2017, 23 measures had not been completed by the Commission47. 
I slutet av december 2017 hade kommissionen inte avslutat 23 tgrder47.
The Commission will report on the implementation of the Action Plan to the Parliament and the Council during 2018. 
Kommissionen kommer att rapportera om genomfrandet av handlingsplanen till Europaparlamentet och rdet under 2018.
In addition, the Action Plan, which was acknowledged by the Council48, encouraged Member States to focus their efforts on certain measures that could be undertaken at the national level. 
I handlingsplanen, som bekrftades av rdet48, uppmanades dessutom medlemsstaterna att koncentrera sina anstrngningar p vissa tgrder som kunde vidtas p nationell niv.
According to the Commission, as these measures were formulated as suggestions for the Member States and fall under their competence, it does not monitor them. 
Eftersom tgrderna formulerades som frslag till medlemsstaterna och omfattas av deras behrighet sger kommissionen att den inte vervakar dem. 22
Member States acknowledge the relevance of the Commission’s role, but the majority is of the opinion that it should not be increased 38. 
Medlemsstaterna bekrftar att kommissionens roll r relevant men majoriteten anser att den inte br utkas 38.
Nearly all those who responded to our survey assessed the support provided by the Commission for the development and implementation of their integration policy as partially or fully relevant. 
Nstan alla som besvarade vr enkt bedmde att stdet frn kommissionen var delvis eller helt relevant nr det gllde utvecklingen och genomfrandet av deras integrationspolitik.
In particular, Member States valued the availability of dedicated funding (AMIF) for migrants and the ability to exchange good practices through the EIN. 
Medlemsstaterna vrdesatte srskilt tillgngen till srskild finansiering (Amif) fr migranter och mjligheten att utbyta god praxis genom det europeiska integrationsntverket.
However, 13 members of the EIN reported that they would appreciate more flexibility in the use of EU funds and a reduction in the administrative burden in spending it. 
Tretton medlemmar i det europeiska integrationsntverket rapporterade emellertid att de skulle uppskatta om EU-fonderna kunde utnyttjas mer flexibelt och den administrativa brdan fr att anvnda dem minskade.
The majority of EIN members (20 out of the 29 that provided a reply) consider that the current competences of the Commission in the field of migrant integration should not be increased. 
Majoriteten av medlemmarna i det europeiska integrationsntverket (20 av de 29 som besvarade frgan) anser att kommissionens nuvarande befogenheter nr det gller integration av migranter inte br utkas.
MEMBER STATES ARE PRIMARILY RESPONSIBLE FOR MIGRANT INTEGRATION 39. Although the EU plays an important role, primary responsibility for integration policies lies with the Member States, at national, regional and local level. 
MEDLEMSSTATERNA ANSVARAR I F RSTA HAND F R INTEGRATIONEN AV MIGRANTER 39. ven om EU spelar en viktig roll har medlemsstaterna det primra ansvaret fr integrationspolitiken p nationell, regional och lokal niv.
In this context, we reviewed how integration policies in the Member States shape migrant integration, including the tools used to monitor outcomes, and how coordination arrangements at EU and national level are set up to ensure synergies and complementarity between funds. 
Mot denna bakgrund gick vi igenom hur medlemsstaternas integrationspolitik formar migranternas integration, bland annat vilka verktyg som anvnds fr att vervaka utfall, och hur samordningen p EU-niv och nationell niv har strukturerats fr att skerstlla synergier och komplementaritet mellan fonder.
Most Member States have integration policies in place 22 Challenge 4: Commitment of Member States to implement the Action Plan The effective implementation of Action Plan measures relating to Member States depends on their commitment. 
Utmaning 4: Medlemsstaternas engagemang fr att genomfra handlingsplanen Medlemsstaternas engagemang avgr i vilken grad de ndamlsenligt genomfr de handlingsplanstgrder som gller dem.
40. Actions targeting migrants are developed under different policy frameworks. 
De flesta medlemsstater har en integrationspolitik 40. tgrder riktade till migranter utformas inom olika politiska ramar.
Some Member States have national integration policies, some develop actions at a local or regional level and others incorporate migrant integration in policies not specifically designed for migrants. 
Ngra medlemsstater har en nationell integrationspolitik, ngra tar fram tgrder p lokal eller regional niv och andra infrlivar integration av migranter i politik som inte utformats specifikt fr migranter.
At the end of 2017, 25 Member States had a national/regional or local integration policy in place targeting migrants50. 
I slutet av 2017 hade 25 medlemsstater en nationell/regional eller lokal integrationspolitik som var inriktad p migranter50.
According to our survey, 22 Member States revised their integration policies since 2014. 
Vr enkt visade att 22 medlemsstater hade ndrat sin integrationspolitik sedan 2014.
Although the absence of a specific policy does not mean that no action on migrant integration is taken, it may lead to difficulties in the implementation of a comprehensive approach towards that target group. 
Avsaknaden av en specifik politik betyder inte att det inte vidtas tgrder fr att integrera migranter men kan gra det svrt att genomfra en samlad strategi fr mlgruppen.
Our survey shows that currently refugees are the group of migrants most commonly the subject of government action. 
Vr enkt visar att flyktingar fr nrvarande r den migrantgrupp som oftast r freml fr statliga tgrder.
However, many Member States do not take action in relation to some groups of migrants (such as young migrants51 or stateless people - see Figure 9), or in some areas of integration (see Figure 10). 
Emellertid vidtar mnga medlemsstater inga tgrder fr vissa migrantgrupper (ssom unga migranter51 eller statslsa personer Đ se figur 9), eller inom vissa integrationsomrden (se figur 10).
In addition, 14 Member States stated that since 2014 they had reassessed the needs of migrants and 16 Member States stated that they had shifted the focus of integration measures to other target groups in response to the increase in migratory inflows. 
Vidare uppgav 14 medlemsstater att de sedan 2014 hade omprvat migranternas behov och 16 att de hade riktat om integrationstgrderna mot andra mlgrupper p grund av det kade infldet av migranter.
Figure 9 - Many Member States do not have policies relating to particular groups of migrants 23 Young migrants Migrant women Migrant children Asylum seekers Family members Highly qualified workers Stateless Other workers Migrants in rural areas Researchers Students Newly arrived migrants Humanitarian protection Subsidiary protection Refugees Number of EIN respondents that have policies where the target group is included Number of EIN respondents that have policies specifically addressing the target group 4 25 27 29 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 7 1 1 12 15 16 17 18 1 1 1 17 20 9 9 9 20 21 22 23 2 Source: ECA, based on the survey. 
Figur 9 Đ Mnga medlemsstater har ingen politik som r srskilt inriktad p vissa migrantgrupper 25 Unga migranter Migrerande kvinnor 16 Migrerande barn Asylskande Familjemedlemmar 19 Hgkvalificerade arbetstagare Statslsa Andra arbetstagare Migranter i landsbygdsomrden Forskare Studerande Nyanlnda migranter Humanitrt skydd Subsidirt skydd Flyktingar 4 15 Antalet respondenter i det europeiska integrationsntverket som har en politik dr mlgruppen ingr Antalet respondenter i det europeiska integrationsntverket som har en politik specifikt riktad till mlgruppen 4 4 3 2 3 4 5 6 5 7 1 1 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 17 17 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 20 27 29 Klla: Revisionsrtten, baserat p enkten.
Figure 10 - Member States do not develop integration measures in all areas Note: Four Member States did not reply to this question. 
Figur 10 Đ Medlemsstaterna utarbetar inte integrationstgrder inom alla omrden Anm.: Fyra medlemsstater besvarade inte frgan.
The SAI reports we reviewed highlighted several shortcomings in the design and implementation of Member States’ integration policies: - deficiencies in the design of the integration policies (22 reports related to 11 Member States). 
I de rapporter frn nationella revisionsorgan som vi kontrollerade belystes flera brister i utformningen och genomfrandet av medlemsstaternas integrationspolitik: - Brister i utformningen av integrationspolitiken (22 rapporter om elva medlemsstater).
The reports found problems concerning the existence of legislative gaps or legal restrictions that prevent the smooth implementation of actions (12 reports), weaknesses in the planning of different integration measures (seven reports) and the involvement of all relevant stakeholders in the integration process (three reports), and; - weaknesses related to the implementation of integration measures for migrants. The measures were considered insufficient, inadequate or not used to the maximum extent (19 reports related to 12 Member States). 
Rapporterna handlade om problem med frekomst av lagstiftningsluckor eller rttsliga begrnsningar som gr att tgrder inte kan genomfras smidigt (tolv rapporter), brister i planeringen av olika integrationstgrder (sju rapporter) och alla berrda aktrers engagemang i integrationsprocessen (tre rapporter). - Brister i samband med genomfrandet av integrationstgrder fr migranter. tgrderna ansgs vara otillrckliga, olmpliga eller inte maximalt utnyttjade (19 rapporter om tolv medlemsstater).
24 Education Social inclusion Employment Health Housing Vocational training Number of Member States that have measures (% of total) 23 (82 %) 22 (79 %) 18 (64 %) 18 (64 %) 17 (61 %) 14 (50 %) Box 3 - Examples of inadequate or insufficient integration measures reported by the SAIs In one Member State, the SAI reported that the access to integration measures, for persons under protection for less than one year, was restricted to the capital of the country. 
Till exempel fr alla migrantgrupper inte delta i vissa tgrder, ngra r inte helt inriktade p migranternas behov och andra genomfrs inte Utbildning Social delaktighet Sysselsttning Hlso-och sjukvrd Boende Yrkesutbildning Antal medlemsstater som har tgrder (% av totalen) 23 (82 %) 22 (79 %) 18 (64 %) 18 (64 %) 17 (61 %) 14 (50 %) effektivt.
In another Member State, support for persons under protection was found to be mainly limited to payments of cash. 
I en annan medlemsstat konstaterades att stdet till personer som beviljats skydd frmst bestod i utbetalning av kontanter.
Language training was also reported as not being adequate for migrants to learn the national language in four Member States (e.g., amount of training hours found insufficient, migrants could not participate in training or available funding not sufficient). 
Det rapporterades ocks att sprktrningen i fyra medlemsstater var otillrcklig fr att migranter skulle kunna lra sig det nationella sprket (dvs. antalet utbildningstimmar var otillrckligt, migranter kunde inte delta i undervisningen eller den tillgngliga finansieringen rckte inte).
SAI reports also highlighted that particular target groups were not systematically covered by integration measures. 
I rapporterna frn de nationella revisionsorganen understrks ocks att vissa mlgrupper inte systematiskt omfattades av integrationstgrder.
For instance in a Member State, 33 municipalities did not offer any individual support measures to persons who had been granted protection until they were considered residents of the municipality. 
I en medlemsstat till exempel erbjd 33 kommuner inga individuella stdtgrder till personer som beviljats skydd innan de ansgs ha blivit invnare i kommunen.
In another Member State, no specific integration measures for persons under protection had been envisaged in the first five years after their arrival. 
I en annan medlemsstat hade inga specifika integrationstgrder fr personer som beviljats skydd planerats under de frsta fem ren efter deras ankomst.
Data on integration is currently limited 43. 
Uppgifterna om integration r i nulget begrnsade 43.
At EU level, the Council52 agreed in 2010 on a set of common EU core indicators ('Zaragoza indicators') to measure migrant integration in the areas of employment, education, social inclusion and active citizenship. 
P EU-niv kom rdet52 2010 verens om en uppsttning gemensamma krnindikatorer (Zaragoza-indikatorerna) fr att mta migranternas integration inom omrdena sysselsttning, utbildning, social delaktighet och aktivt medborgarskap.
These indicators represent a step forward in understanding integration in the EU. 
Indikatorerna innebr ett framsteg fr frstelsen av integration i EU.
According to the Commission, however, they have limitations53: data on the migrant population is not always harmonised, indicators are not always reliable, and the different groups of migrants cannot be identified. 
Enligt kommissionen har de dock begrnsningar53: uppgifterna om migrantpopulationen r inte alltid harmoniserade, indikatorerna r inte alltid tillfrlitliga och de olika grupperna av migranter kan inte identifieras.
This is mainly because the Zaragoza indicators use information from EU-wide standardized sample surveys54 that do not cover all migrants and are likely to have a low response rate from migrants. 
Det beror framfr allt p att Zaragoza-indikatorerna anvnder information frn standardiserade urvalsenkter som grs ver hela EU54 men inte omfattar alla migranter och sannolikt har en lg svarsfrekvens frn migranter.
About half of the respondents to our survey stated that they did not use Zaragoza indicators to monitor the outcomes of their integration policies. 
Omkring hlften av dem som svarade p vr enkt uppgav att de inte anvnde Zaragoza-indikatorerna 27 fr att vervaka utfallet av sin integrationspolitik.
In total, 30 % of respondents do not use any indicator to monitor the outcome of their integration policies. 
Sammantaget anvnder 30 % av respondenterna inte ngon indikator fr att vervaka utfallet av sin integrationspolitik.
The Commission is also working to improve the availability of data. 
Kommissionen arbetar ocks fr att frbttra tillgngen p uppgifter.
In 2016, the Commission set up a Knowledge Centre on Migration and Demography under the Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), which aims to better manage the information currently available and to strengthen the Commission’s ability to respond to the challenges posed by migration. 
Kommissionen inrttade 2016 ett kunskapscentrum fr migration och demografi inom kommissionens gemensamma forskningscentrum, fr att frbttra dels frvaltningen av den information som fr nrvarande finns tillgnglig, dels kommissionens frmga att reagera p de utmaningar som migration innebr.
The Commission also developed two new indicators related to the health of migrants and enhanced the coverage of some employment indicators by adding a regional dimension and a level of urbanisation. 
Kommissionen tog ven fram tv nya indikatorer fr migranters hlsa och utvidgade ngra sysselsttningsindikatorer genom att lgga till en regional dimension och en urbaniseringsniv.
In 2018, the Commission, together with OECD, intends to publish a report on integration indicators to compare the situation in EU Member States and non-EU Member States55. In 202156, the Commission is planning to provide further information on the labour situation of migrants and their immediate descendants, similar to what was provided in 201457. 
Kommissionen planerar ocks att tillsammans med OECD under 2018 offentliggra en rapport om indikatorer fr integration fr att jmfra situationen i EU-medlemsstater och lnder som inte med i EU55. r 202156 planerar kommissionen att tillhandahlla ytterligare information om arbetsmarknadssituationen fr migranter och deras barn, p liknande stt som 201457.