25 TaBlE 3 Location In place Under construction Study / preparatory Planning not started Priority Project 1 Germany-Austria München-Kufstein  Austria-Italy Brenner Tunnel  Priority Project 2 Germany-Belgium Aachen-Düren-Köln  Netherlands-Belgium Rotterdam-Antwerpen  Priority Project 3 France-Spain (Atlantic) Dax-Vittoria  France-Spain (Mediterranean) Perpignan-Figueras  Priority Project 6 France-Italy Lyon-Turin  France-Germany Kehl bridge  Priority Project 17 Germany-Austria Mühldorf-Freilassing  Austria-Slovakia Vienna-Bratislava  Priority Project 23 Priority Project 24 Poland-Slovakia Bielsko Biala - Zwardon  Netherlands-Germany Zevenaar-Emerich  Germany-France Mulhouse  INfrasTrUCTUrE DEVEloPMENTs aT Cross BorDEr loCaTIoNs oN ThE saMPlED PrIorITy ProjECTs special report no 8/2010 – Improving transport performance on trans-european rail axes: Have eu rail infrastructure investments been effective? 26 ThE Co-orDINaTors haVE haD a PosITIVE INflUENCE IN CoNCENTraTING INVEsTMENTs aND faCIlITaTING DEVEloPMENTs oN ThE PrIorITy ProjECTs 32. the co-ordinators have had a positive influence in the targeting of eu investments, in particular through: ο facilitating contacts between stakeholders in order to progress developments on problematic sections of the priority projects, especially where it has proved necessary to agree a clear shared vision of the target rail transportation market and the specifications of the required infrastructure developments22 (for example, agreement between french and spanish authorities on the mediterranean branch of priority project 323, and the brenner corridor platform (see Box 5)); ο emphasising to member states the importance of proposing particular sections for eu co-financing (for example, regarding the brenner corridor on priority project 1 and bottlenecks and cross-border sections at stuttgart and between münchen and freilassing on priority project 17) whilst emphasising that other sections would not be positively received, such as those including station infrastructure not relating directly to the operation of trains; and ο encouraging co-operation between rail authorities in member states regarding improving transport performance and alleviating operational and other problems on existing corridors (such as the IQc (see Box 14), the technical working group put in place on priority project 6 and the ertms corridors). 
25 taBell 3 Prioriterat projekt 1 Avsnitt Klart Utbyggnad pågår Studie/för-beredelser Planeringen har inte börjat Tyskland–Österrike München–Kufstein  Österrike–Italien Brennertunneln  Prioriterat projekt 2 Prioriterat projekt 3 Tyskland–Belgien Aachen–Düren–Köln  Nederländerna–Belgien Rotterdam–Antwerpen  Frankrike–Spanien (Atlanten) Dax–Vittoria  Frankrike–Spanien (Medelhavet) Perpignan–Figueras  Prioriterat projekt 6 Frankrike–Italien Lyon–Turin  Frankrike–Tyskland Bro vid Kehl  Prioriterat projekt 17 Tyskland–Österrike Mühldorf–Freilassing  Österrike–Slovakien Wien–Bratislava  Prioriterat projekt 23 Prioriterat projekt 24 Polen–Slovakien Bielsko Biała–Zwardón  Nederländerna–Tyskland Zevenaar–Emmerich  Tyskland–Frankrike Mulhouse  infraStrukturutByggnaden i gränSOmråden SOm ingick i urvalet av PriOriterade PrOjekt särskild rapport nr 8/2010 – Att förbättra transportarbetet på transeuropeiska järnvägsleder: Har eu:s investeringar i järnvägsinfrastruktur varit ändamålsenliga?