natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In case of negative decision, the asylum seekers is entitled to appeal. • A First time asylum applicant is a person who lodged an application for international protection for the first time in a given Member State during the reference period, irrespective of the fact that he is found to have applied in another Member State. • Residence Permit is any authorisation valid for at least three months issued by the authorities of an EU Member State allowing a migrant to stay legally on its territory. • The Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) promotes the efficient management of migration flows and the implementation, strengthening and development of a common Union approach to asylum and immigration. • Cohesion Policy: Cohesion policy is one of the biggest policy areas on which the EU budget is spent. 
Ľ En statsls person r ngon som inte betraktas som medborgare i ngon stat enligt dess lagstiftning. I detta briefingdokument omfattas de av termen tredjelandsmedborgare. Ľ En skande som fr frsta gngen ansker om asyl r en person som fr frsta gngen anskte om internationellt skydd i en viss medlemsstat under referensperioden ven om det konstateras att personen har anskt i en annan medlemsstat.
3 • European Integration Network (EIN) promotes the cooperation with national, local and regional entities and other EU level networks in areas related to the integration of migrants. 
Ľ Det europeiska integrationsntverket frmjar samarbete mellan nationella, lokala och regionala enheter och andra ntverk p EU-niv inom omrden relaterade till integrationen av migranter.
It is one of the measures of the 'Action Plan on integration' implemented by the Commission and replaces the former Network of National Contact Points on Integration. • The European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) aims at helping fishermen in the transition to sustainable fishing and at supporting coastal communities in diversifying their economies. • European Regional Development Fund (ERDF): The European Regional Development Fund aims to reinforce economic and social cohesion within the European Union by redressing the main regional imbalances through financial support for the creation of infrastructure and productive job-creating investment, mainly for businesses. • European Social Fund (ESF): The European Social Fund aims at promoting high levels of employment and job quality, encouraging a high level of education and training for all, combating poverty and enhancing social inclusion, thereby contributing to strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion within the European Union. • European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF): Over half of EU funding is channelled through the five European structural and investment funds. 
Ľ Europeiska jordbruksfonden fr landsbygdsutveckling (Ejflu): Ejflu r EU:s finansiella std till landsbygdsutvecklingsprogram, som syftar till att frmja jordbrukets konkurrenskraft, skerstlla hllbar frvaltning av naturresurser och klimattgrder samt uppn en territoriellt balanserad utveckling av ekonomier och samhllen p landsbygden, inbegripet skapande och upprtthllande av sysselsttning. 3 Ľ Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden (Eruf): Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfondens ml r att strka den ekonomiska och sociala sammanhllningen inom Europeiska unionen genom att avhjlpa de strsta regionala obalanserna via ekonomiskt std till infrastruktursatsningar och produktiva jobbskapande investeringar, frmst fr fretag.
They are jointly managed by the European Commission and EU Member States. 
De frvaltas gemensamt av Europeiska kommissionen och EU:s medlemsstater.
The funds include: European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); European Social Fund (ESF); Cohesion Fund (CF); European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD); and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF). • The Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived (FEAD) contributes to alleviate the worst forms of poverty, by providing non-financial assistance to the most deprived persons by food and/or basic material assistance, and social inclusion activities aiming at the social integration of the most deprived persons. • Integration/Inclusion: Integration, according to the ‘Common Basic Principles for immigrant integration policy’, is a ‘dynamic, two-way process of mutual accommodation by immigrants and residents of Member State’. 
Fonderna r: Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden (Eruf), Europeiska socialfonden (ESF), Sammanhllningsfonden, Europeiska jordbruksfonden fr landsbygdsutveckling (Ejflu) och Europeiska havs-och fiskerifonden (EHFF). Ľ Fonden fr europeiskt bistnd till dem som har det smst stllt (Fead) bidrar till att lindra de vrsta formerna av fattigdom genom att genom att tillhandahlla icke-finansiellt std till dem som har det smst stllt i form av livsmedelsbistnd och/eller grundlggande materiellt bistnd och genom tgrder fr social delaktighet i syfte att se till att de personer som har det smst stllt integreras i samhllet.
Integration and inclusion are often used as synonyms: integration is generally used in the context of the action aiming at an actual application of the fundamental rights or values (as such described in the Article 2 of the TFEU) whereas inclusion is more often referred to in the context of socio-economic measures. • Supreme audit institutions (SAI): national bodies responsible for examining government revenue and expenditure. 
Ľ Integration/inkludering: Integration r enligt de gemensamma grundprinciperna fr en integrationspolitik fr invandrare en Ódynamisk dubbelriktad process med msesidigt tillmtesgende mellan alla invandrare och invnare i medlemsstaternaÓ. Integration och inkludering anvnds ofta synonymt: integration anvnds i allmnhet i samband med tgrder fr att grundlggande rttigheter och vrden (vilka beskrivs i artikel 2 i EUF-frdraget) ska tillmpas i praktiken, medan inkludering oftare anvnds i samband med socioekonomiska tgrder.
There is one SAI in each of the EU Member States, the European Court of Auditors is the SAI of the EU. • TFEU: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. • The Youth Employment Initiative (YEI): The YEI aims to provide financial support to regions with youth unemployment rates above 25 %. 
Den finansieras frn Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden (Eruf), Europeiska socialfonden (ESF) och Sammanhllningsfonden. Ľ Sysselsttningsinitiativet fr ungdomar (YEI): Sysselsttningsinitiativet fr ungdomar ska ge ekonomiskt std till regioner med ungdomsarbetslshetsniver p ver 25 %.
Annex II Number of migrants in the Member States and its percentage in the population (2017) 1 Number of migrants (in million) 012345 3.7% 5.3% 6.3% of the population in the Member State are migrants 4.6% 5.8% 7.7% 5.6% 5.3% 4.0% 5% 2.9% 4.9% 2.7% 2. 0.5% 2.6% 2.9% 4.6% 0.7% 0.9% 0.3% 0.7% Germany Italy France Spain United Kingdom Austria Greece Sweden Belgium Netherlands Czech Republic Denmark Portugal Latvia Poland Estonia Finland Ireland Slovenia Hungary Bulgaria Romania Luxembourg Croatia Cyprus Malta Slovakia Lithuania 14.0% 13.7% 6.9% 3.5% 5.2% 0.3% 0.5% Number of migrants (million persons) Percentage of migrant in the total population Source: ECA, based on Eurostat as of March 2018. 
BILAGA II Antalet migranter i medlemsstaterna och deras procentuella andel av befolkningen (2017) 1 Antal migranter (i miljoner) 012345 6,3% av befolkningen i medlemsstaten r migranter 4,6% 5,8% 3,7% 5,3% 0,5% 0,7% 0,9% 0,3% 2,6% 2,9% 4,6% 0,7% Tyskland Italien Frankrike Spanien Frenade kungariket sterrike Grekland Sverige Belgien Nederlnderna Tjeckien Danmark Portugal Lettland Polen Estland Finland Irland Slovenien Ungern Bulgarien Rumnien Luxemburg Kroatien Cypern Malta Slovakien Litauen 7,7% 5,6% 5,3% 4,0% 2,5% 2,9% 4,9% 2,7% 14,0% 13,7% 6,9% 3,5% 5,2% 0,3% 0,5% Antal migranter (miljoner personer) Andel migranter i procent av den totala befolkningen Klla: Revisionsrtten, p grundval av uppgifter frn Eurostat frn mars 2018.
Survey on migrant integration We received the replies to our survey between 18 October and 20 December 2017. 
Enkt om integration av migranter Svaren p vr enkt kom in mellan den 18 oktober och den 20 december 2017.
All Members of the European Integration Network replied and we received 32 replies: four from Belgium (Brussels region, German-speaking community, Flemish region and Walloon region), one from each of the other 27 Member States and one from Norway. 
Alla medlemmar av det europeiska integrationsntverket svarade, och vi fick 32 svar: fyra frn Belgien (Brysselregionen, den tysksprkiga gemenskapen, regionen Flandern och regionen Vallonien), ett frn var och en av de vriga 27 medlemsstaterna och ett frn Norge.
Below we present the number of replies to each of the questions. 
Nedan presenterar vi antalet svar p varje frga.
The numbers represent the number of EIN members that replied to the specific question of the survey; it does not correspond to the number of Member States. 
Siffrorna anger antalet medlemmar av det europeiska integrationsntverket som besvarade den specifika enktfrgan, det motsvarar inte antalet medlemsstater.
Question 1 - Name and contact details of the person filling this survey Annex III 1 Question 2 - What are the target groups of your integration policy? 
Frga 1 Đ Namn och kontaktuppgifter fr den person som fyller i frgeformulret Bilaga III 1 Frga 2 Đ Vilka r mlgrupperna fr ert lands integrationspolitik?
Mark if applicable Mark if there is a particular focus4 Person seeking or granted protection Refugees 29 20 Beneficiaries of subsidiary protection 27 17 Beneficiaries of humanitarian protection 21 12 Asylum seekers 20 6 Other migrants Family members 26 5 Highly qualified workers 16 4 Researchers 15 4 Students 18 5 Other workers 20 3 Stateless persons 19 4 Migrant children1 25 11 Migrant women 23 7 Young Migrants 26 6 Migrants established in rural areas 20 3 Newly arrived2 migrants with residence permit 23 8 Foreign born nationals3 14 5 EU citizens3 14 4 Notes: 1 I.e. minor migrants, accompanied or not. 2 Less than one year of legal residence in the host country. 
Ange om tillmpligt Ange om det finns ett srskilt fokus4 Person som sker eller beviljats skydd Flyktingar 29 20 Personer som har status som subsidirt skyddsbehvande 27 17 Personer som har beviljats humanitrt skydd 21 12 Asylskande 20 6 Andra migranter Familjemedlemmar 26 5 Hgkvalificerade arbetstagare 16 4 Forskare 15 4 Studerande 18 5 Andra arbetstagare 20 3 Statslsa personer 19 4 Migrerande barn1 25 11 Migrerande kvinnor 23 7 Unga migranter 26 6 Migranter frn landsbygdsomrden 20 3 Nyanlnda migranter2 med uppehllstillstnd 23 8 Utlandsfdda medborgare3 14 5 EU-medborgare3 14 4 Anm.: 1 Dvs. ensamkommande eller tfljt barn frn tredjeland.
3 Not to be considered as migrants from outside the EU. 
3 Ska inte ses som migranter frn lnder utanfr EU.
4 Mark if there are specific actions or important part of funding targeting the group. 
4 Ange om specifika tgrder vidtas eller om en betydande del av finansieringen r riktad till gruppen.
Question 3 - How do the following factors contribute to the effectiveness of migrant integration?1 Negative Positive No impact Economic and political environment Economic environment (Employment rate, demographic changes, etc.) 
Frga 3 Đ Hur bidrar fljande faktorer till en ndamlsenlig integration av tredjelandsmedborgare?1 Negativt Positivt Ingen inverkan Ekonomiska och politiska frutsttningar Ekonomiska frutsttningar (sysselsttningsgrad, demografiska frndringar etc.)
11 22 3 Political environment 8 23 3 Funding for integration Availability and accessibility to EU funds 1 28 0 Availability and accessibility to national/ regional and/ or local funds 2 26 3 Policy for integration Existence of an integration policy at national/ regional or local level 0 30 1 Quality of the policy design at national/ regional or local level 0 27 2 Mainstreaming of the integration policy into other relevant policies 0 27 3 Role of NGOs and other stakeholders 0 31 0 Coordination amongst different governance levels 0 28 2 Institutional entities dedicated to the integration of migrants 0 24 3 Policy monitoring 0 24 5 
11 22 3 Politiska frutsttningar 8 23 3 Finansiering till integration Tillgng och tillgnglighet till EU-medel 1 28 0 Tillgng och tillgnglighet till nationella/regionala och/eller lokala medel 2 26 3 Integrationspolitik Frekomst av en integrationspolitik p nationell/regional eller lokal niv 0 30 1 Kvalitet p utformningen av politiken p nationell/regional eller lokal niv 0 27 2
2 EU laws and policy instruments 2 26 4 Attitude toward integration Anti-discrimination measures in the country 2 28 1 Attitude of hosting population 62 19 3 Attitude of migrants 1 21 5 Promoting awareness about the benefits of integration 0 24 4 Legal rights of TCNs Access to labour market 1 29 0 Access to family reunification 1 27 1 Access to citizenship/ long-term residence 0 26 3 Access to social and health services 2 29 0 Access to housing 3 24 2 Access to education 0 28 1 Skills-education TCNs knowledge of the host society's language 4 26 2 Procedures to recognise qualifications 4 26 1 Educational level of migrants 4 18 8 Note: 1 In some cases, the respondents identified more than one type of impact on a determined factor. 
2 Integrering av integrationspolitiken i andra relevanta politikomrden 0 27 3 Icke-statliga organisationers och andra berrda parters roll 0 31 0 Samordning mellan olika frvaltningsniver 0 28 2 Institutionella enheter som arbetar med integration av migranter 0 24 3 vervakning av politiken 0 24 5 EU:s lagstiftning och politiska instrument 2 26 4 Instllning till integration Antidiskrimineringstgrder i landet 2 28 1 Vrdbefolkningens attityd 62 19 3 Migranternas attityd 1 21 5 Medvetandegrande om frdelarna med integration 0 24 4 Tredjelandsmedborgares lagstadgade rttigheter Tilltrde till arbetsmarknaden 1 29 0 Mjlighet till familjeterfrening 1 27 1 Mjlighet att beviljas medborgarskap/varaktig bosttning 0 26 3 Tillgng till sociala tjnster och hlso-och sjukvrdstjnster 2 29 0 Tillgng till bostad 3 24 2 Tillgng till utbildning 0 28 1 Frdigheter Đ utbildning Tredjelandsmedborgarnas kunskaper i vrdlandets sprk 4 26 2 Frfaranden fr erknnande av kvalifikationer 4 26 1 Migranternas utbildningsniv 4 18 8 Anm.: 1 I ngra fall identifierade respondenterna mer n en typ av effekt av en viss faktor.
Therefore, the total number of replies for each factor can be more than the total number of respondents. 
Det totala antalet svar fr varje faktor kan drfr vara hgre n det totala antalet respondenter.
2 Two respondents identified the attitude of hosting population as having both a positive and a negative impact. 
2 Tv respondenter angav att vrdbefolkningens attityd hade bde en positiv och en negativ effekt.
Question 4 - Did the recent EU migratory challenge (since 2014) led your country to change any aspect of the integration policy followed? 
Frga 4 Đ Har EU:s senaste migrationsutmaning (sedan 2014) lett till att er land ndrat sin integrationspolitik i ngot avseende?
Mark if applicable National and/or regional and/or local strategies / action plans were created 22 Change in the allocation of funds to the integration of migrants 22 A new entity was created to deal with a particular aspect of the policy or an existing entity was granted more functions 17 The needs of the migrants were reassessed 14 The focus was shifted to another target group (e.g. refugees, young migrants, etc.) 16 Additional measures were developed 15 More indicators were developed 7 Other (please specify) 3 Question 5 - Are there studies/ evidence on the effects of the integration policy of your country for the integration of migrants? 
Ange om tillmpligt Nationella och/eller regionala och/eller lokala strategier/handlingsplaner utarbetades 22 Medel omfrdelades till integration av migranter 22 En ny enhet inrttades fr att hantera en specifik aspekt av politiken eller en befintlig enhet tilldelades fler uppgifter 17 Migranternas behov omprvades 14 Fokus flyttades till en annan mlgrupp (t.ex. flyktingar eller unga migranter) 16 Fler tgrder togs fram 15 Fler indikatorer utarbetades 7 Annat (ange vad) 3 Frga 5 Đ Finns det studier om/bevis fr effekterna av ert lands integrationspolitik p integrationen av tredjelandsmedborgare?
Yes – 22 No – 9 Question 6 - Which funds does your country use to implement measures for the integration of migrants? 
Ja Đ 22 Nej Đ 9 Frga 6 Đ Vilka medel anvnder ert land fr att genomfra tgrder fr integration av tredjelandsmedborgare?
EU Funds AMIF Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund 30 SOLID funds General programme on Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows consisting of four funds (EIF, ERF, EBF, RF) 23 EAFRD European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development 3 EMFF European Maritime and Fisheries Fund 0 ESF European Social Fund 23 ERDF European Regional Development Fund 5 FEAD Fund for European Aid to the most Deprived 4 EaSI EU programme for Employment and Social innovation 1 Horizon 2020 EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 1 YEI Youth Employment Initiative 1 ERASMUS+ European Programme for education, training, youth and sport 6 COSME Competitiveness of Enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises 0 Europe for Citizens programme 0 Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme 0 Justice Programme 0 National funds 24 
EU-fonder Amif Asyl-, migrations-och integrationsfonden 30 Solidfonderna Allmnt program fr solidaritet och hantering av migrationsstrmmar som bestr av fyra fonder (EIF, Europeiska flyktingfonden, fonden fr yttre grnser och Europeiska tervndandefonden) 23 Ejflu Europeiska jordbruksfonden fr landsbygdsutveckling 3 EHFF Europeiska havs-och fiskerifonden 0 ESF Europeiska socialfonden 23 Eruf Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden 5 Fead Fonden fr europeiskt bistnd till dem som har det smst stllt 4 EaSI EU-program fr sysselsttning och social innovation 1 Horisont 2020 EU:s ramprogram fr forskning och innovation 1 YEI Sysselsttningsinitiativet fr unga 1
Yes – 6 Partially – 20 No – 5 Question 8 - Are the numbers of migrants supported and the corresponding funding from EU and national funds detailed by groups of migrants (e.g. workers, refugees, family members, etc.)? 
Ja Đ 6 Delvis Đ 20 Nej Đ 5 Frga 8 Đ r antalet tredjelandsmedborgare som fr std och motsvarande finansiering genom EU-medel och nationella medel uppdelade per grupp av migranter (t.ex. arbetstagare, flyktingar eller familjemedlemmar)?
EU funds Yes, for all funds Yes, for some funds No 1 10 18 National funds Yes, for all funds Yes, for some funds No 2 5 16 Question 9 - Is there a coordination body between the different entities responsible for the implementation of measures related to the integration of migrants? 
EU-medel Ja, nr det gller alla medel Ja, nr det gller vissa medel Nej 1 10 18 Nationella medel Ja, nr det gller alla medel Ja, nr det gller vissa medel Nej 2 5 16 Frga 9 Đ Finns det ett organ som samordnar arbetet vid de olika enheter som ansvarar fr genomfrandet av tgrder fr integration av migranter?
Yes – 26 No – 5 Question 10 - Are the different EU funds supporting the same type of interventions for the same target group when implementing actions in your country? 
Ja Đ 26 Nej Đ 5 Frga 10 Đ Stder de olika EU-medlen samma typ av insatser fr samma mlgrupp nr tgrder genomfrs i ert land?
Yes – 2 Partially – 8 No – 19 Question 11 - Please provide the total number and corresponding breakdown of the entities responsible for the implementation and monitoring of measures related to the integration of migrants. 
Ja Đ 2 Delvis Đ 8 Nej Đ 19 Frga 11 Đ Ange alla enheter som ansvarar fr genomfrandet och vervakningen av tgrder relaterade till integrationen av migranter och vem som gr vad.
The results are therefore not meaningful and thus not presented. 
Resultaten r drfr inte meningsfulla och redovisas slunda inte.
Total Implementing national funds (departments of) Ministries Other (please specify) Other (please specify) Implementing EU funds Managing authorities Intermediary bodies Responsible Authorities Delegated Authorities Other (please specify) Other (please specify) TOTAL Question 12 - Does your country use the Zaragoza indicators? 
Totalt Genomfrande av nationella medel (avdelningar vid) Ministerier Annat (ange vad) Annat (ange vad) Genomfrande av EU-medel Frvaltningsmyndigheter Frmedlande organ Ansvariga myndigheter Delegerade myndigheter Annat (ange vad) Annat (ange vad) TOTALT Frga 12 Đ Anvnder ert land Zaragoza-indikatorerna?
All indicators are used Indicators are partially used Indicators are not used Employment 1 13 16 Education 1 14 15 Social Inclusion 3 11 16 Active citizenship 2 11 17 Question 13 - Does your country use other indicators to monitor the development of its integration policy? 
Alla indikatorer anvnds Indikatorerna anvnds delvis Indikatorerna anvnds inte Sysselsttning 1 13 16 Utbildning 1 14 15 Social delaktighet 3 11 16 Aktivt medborgarskap 2 11 17 Frga 13 Đ Anvnder ert land andra indikatorer fr att vervaka integrationspolitikens utveckling?
Yes – 16 No – 15 Question 14 - Does your Member State have any rules that limit the collection of data per group of migrants? 
Ja Đ 16 Nej Đ 15 4 Frga 14 Đ Har ert land regler som begrnsar insamlingen av uppgifter per grupp av migranter?
Yes – 10 No – 20 Question 15 - Please provide two examples of EU funded projects implemented in your country with a significant relevance for the integration of migrants (for 2 different areas of integration and for the programming period 2014-2020). 
Ja Đ 10 Nej Đ 20 Frga 15 Đ Ge tv exempel p EU-finansierade projekt som har genomfrts i ert land och som har haft stor betydelse fr integrationen av migranter (inom tv olika integrationsomrden och fr programperioden 2014Đ 2020).
4 Question 17 - Which aspect is considered to be the most valued from the support from the Commission? 
Frga 17 Đ Vilken aspekt av stdet frn kommissionen anses vara mest vrdefull?
Question 18 - How could the Commission’ support be improved? 
Frga 18 Đ Hur kan kommissionens std frbttras?
Annex to the survey - Please mark areas of integration where actions are being implemented for the integration of migrants regarding the programme period 2014-2020. Question 19 - Does your country consider that the competence of the EU in the field of the integration of migrants should be increased? 
Delvis Đ 19 Delvis eller inte helt relevant Đ 8 Inte relevant Đ 0 Det gavs inget std Đ 2 Frga 19 Đ Anser ert land att EU:s behrighet br ka nr det gller integrationen av tredjelandsmedborgare?
Note: the numbers represent the numbers of replies to each category Yes – 9 No – 20 EU fund Integration Measures Mark if applicable EU fund Integration Measures Mark if applicable AMIF Employment 12 FEAD Employment 0 Education 24 Education 0 Vocational training 11 Vocational training 0 Housing 16 Housing 0 Health 16 Health 0 Social inclusion 26 Social inclusion 4 ESF/ YEI Employment 15 ERDF Employment 0 Education 8 Education 0 Vocational training 13 Vocational training 2 Housing 2 Housing 2 Health 2 Health 3 Social inclusion 14 Social inclusion 3 EAFRD Employment 0 EMFF Employment 0 Education 0 Education 0 Vocational training 0 Vocational training 0 Housing 0 Housing 0 Health 0 Health 0 Social inclusion 2 Social inclusion 0 
Anm.: Siffrorna visar antalet svar i varje kategori. Ja Đ 9 Nej Đ 20 EU-fond Integrationstgrder Ange om tillmpligt EU-fond Integrationstgrder Ange om tillmpligt Amif Sysselsttning 12 Fead Sysselsttning 0 Utbildning 24 Utbildning 0 Yrkesutbildning 11 Yrkesutbildning 0 Boende 16 Boende 0 Hlso-och sjukvrd 16 Hlso-och sjukvrd 0 Social delaktighet 26 Social delaktighet 4 ESF/ ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet Sysselsttning 15 Eruf Sysselsttning 0 Utbildning 8 Utbildning 0 Yrkesutbildning 13 Yrkesutbildning 2 Boende 2 Boende 2 Hlso-och sjukvrd 2 Hlso-och sjukvrd 3 Social delaktighet 14 Social delaktighet 3 Ejflu Sysselsttning 0 EHFF Sysselsttning 0 Utbildning 0 Utbildning 0 Yrkesutbildning 0 Yrkesutbildning 0 Boende 0 Boende 0 Hlso-och sjukvrd 0 Hlso-och sjukvrd 0 Social delaktighet 2 Social delaktighet 0