natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Also affecting the producer organisationsŐ achievement of the objectives are the strategy followed by the producer organisation, the competition it faces, changing customer requirements and preferences, other EU policies such as for quality and the environment, and even, in the shorter term, weather conditions. 
Producentorganisationernas frverkligande av mlen pverkas ocks av vilken strategi de tillmpar, hur konkurrensen ser ut, konsumenternas ndrade krav och preferenser, annan EU-politik fr till exempel kvalitet och milj och, till och med, p kort sikt, vderfrhllanden.
Have producer organisations made progress towards achieving the objectives set for the aid scheme? 
Har producentorganisationerna gjort framsteg nr det gller att frverkliga de ml som har satts upp fr stdsystemet?
Part I showed that operational programmes have, on the whole, resulted in progress being made towards the Council regulationŐs objectives. 
Av del I framgick att verksamhetsprogram, p det hela taget, har lett till framsteg mot mlen i rdets frordning.
This part of the report examines whether this progress has been reflected in the overall performance of producer organisations. 
I denna del av rapporten undersks om dessa framsteg har terspeglats i producentorganisationernas vergripande resultat.
The report first assesses the sample of producer organisations visited during the audit (Text box 17), then considers the CommissionŐs aggregated data at EU level. 
I rapporten bedms frst det urval av producentorganisationer som besktes i samband med granskningen (se textruta 17), och drefter diskuteras kommissionens aggregerade uppgifter p EU-niv.
Text box 17 Sample characteristics: Producer organisations in the random sample represented 2 % of the total number and 5 % of the turnover of EU producer organisations in 2004. 
Textruta 17 Srdrag fr urvalet: Producentorganisationerna i det slumpmssiga urvalet stod fr 2 % av det totala antalet av och 5 % av omsttningen fr producentorganisationer i EU 2004.
Sample of producer organisations 66. 
Urvalet av producentorganisationer 66.
The 30 producer organisations visited were asked to demonstrate the progress they had made towards each of the 11 objectives, regardless of whether they had included actions related to those objectives in their operational programmes. 
De 30 producentorganisationer som besktes ombads visa vilka framsteg de hade gjort mot vart och ett av de elva mlen, oavsett om de hade tagit med tgrder med koppling till dessa ml i sina verksamhetsprogram eller inte.
This gave a total of 330 cases examined. 
Detta gav sammanlagt 330 underskta fall.
In 54 % of these, the producer organisation was able to provide evidence to show that it had made progress. 
I 54 % av fallen kunde producentorganisationen bevisa att den hade gjort framsteg.
In a further 12 % of cases, the conclusion was reached that the producer organisation had probably made progress. 
I ytterligare 12 % av fallen drogs slutsatsen att producentorganisationen sannolikt hade gjort framsteg.
A lack of information, particularly on production costs and the stability of prices, explained most of the 16 % of cases where a conclusion could not be made (Diagram 9). 
Bristande information, srskilt nr det gllde produktionskostnader och stabila produktionspriser, frklarade flertalet av de 16 % av rendena dr ingen slutsats kunde dras (se diagram 9).
Many producer organisations had not followed the objectives Ôorganic productionŐ and Ôpromoting products to consum-ersŐ, which accounts for most of the 18 % of cases where Ôno progressŐ was observed. 
Mnga producentorganisationer hade inte fljt mlen ÓEkologisk produktionÓ och Ó ka konsumenternas intresse fr produkternaÓ som stod fr merparten av de 18 % av fallen dr Óinga framstegÓ kunde iakttas.
Relatively little progress had also been made against the objectives of Ôreducing production costsŐ and Ôstabilising pricesŐ. 
Det hade ven gjorts relativt sm framsteg mot mlen ÓMinska produktionskostnadernaÓ och ÓSta-bilisera prisernaÓ.
Producer organisations explained that they aimed for increasing prices rather than stable prices, although most considered themselves price-takers and could do little to influence the prices they obtained. 
Producentorganisationerna frklarade att de strvade efter hjda priser snarare n stabila produktionspriser, ven om flertalet av dem ansg att de mste anpassa sig efter andras priser och inte kunde gra mycket fr att pverka de priser de erhll.
More important than simply reducing costs was maximising profit, which often involved increasing costs to obtain better quality and added value. 
Viktigare n att bara minska kostnaderna var att maximera vinsten, viket ofta innebar hjda kostnader fr att f bttre kvalitet och mervrde.
Producer organisations also noted that improving environmental practices usually increased costs, without necessarily leading to increased product prices. 
Producentorganisationerna konstaterade ocks att frbttrade miljmetoder vanligen kade kostnaderna utan att ndvndigtvis leda till hjda produktpriser.
68. Although the sample results show that most producer organisations made at least some progress towards most of the 11 objectives, this is not sufficient on its own to confirm that the operational programme aid scheme has been effective, because of the influence of the other factors described in paragraph 64. 
68. ven om resultat frn urvalet visar att flertalet producentorganisationer hade gjort tminstone vissa framsteg mot de flesta av de elva mlen, rcker inte enbart detta fr att bekrfta att stdsystemet fr verksamhetsprogram har varit ndamlsenligt, eftersom andra faktorer har inverkat, vilket beskrivs i punkt 64.
Diagram 9 Sample of producer organisations: progress towards EU objectives 
Diagram 9 Urval av producentorganisationer: Framsteg mot EU-mlen
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/47 Commission data on producer organisations 69. 
20.11.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 282/47 Kommissionens uppgifter om producentorganisationer 69.
As shown in Part I, the Commission has not taken the opportunity of exploiting the evaluations made by producer organisations in their final reports to monitor achievement of the operational programme objectives. 
Ssom visas i del I har kommissionen inte anvnt mjligheten att utnyttja de utvrderingar som producentorganisationerna gr i sina slutrapporter till att vervaka frverkligandet av verksamhetsprogrammens ml.
Furthermore, the Commission has not so far complied with its obligation under the EU Financial Regulation to evaluate the policy. 
Vidare har kommissionen nnu inte uppfyllt sin skyldighet enligt EU:s budgetfrordning att utvrdera politiken.
An evaluation study is scheduled to start in 2008, with the results expected in 2009. 
En utvrderingsstudie planeras starta 2008, och resultaten frvntas vara klara 2009.
Nevertheless, the Commission does have some information on producer organisations. 
Kommissionen har dock en del information om producentorganisationerna.
It obtains data on the quantities of surplus produce withdrawn from the market for which aid is claimed. 
Den fr uppgifter om den mngd verskottsproduktion som tertas frn marknaden och fr vilken std begrs.
Since 2000, it has also required information on operational programmes and extended the information collected on producer organisations in an annual statistical report from the Member States. 
Sedan 2000 begr kommissionen ocks in uppgifter om verksamhetsprogram och har ven breddat den information om producentorganisationer som samlas in fr en rlig statistisk rapport frn medlemsstaterna.
The data on operational programmes is limited to breakdowns of the aid paid by categories of expenditure. 
Uppgifterna om verksamhetsprogram begrnsas till en uppdelning i utgiftskategorier av det std som betalas ut.
This indicates what the operational programme aid is being spent on, but not what is being achieved with that aid. 
Denna visar vad stdet i verksamhetsprogrammet anvnds till men inte vad som frverkligas genom stdet.
The Commission requires a more extensive set of data on producer organisations, in particular on their membership, their production and their sales. 
Kommissionen behver mer omfattande uppgifter om producentorganisationer, srskilt om medlemmarna, produktionen och frsljningen.
The CourtŐs checks on the reliability of this information were made difficult, as the Commission does not have a proper management information system for recording the data. 
Revisionsrttens kontroller av dessa uppgifters tillfrlitlighet frsvrades av att kommissionen inte har ngot ordentligt frvaltningsinformationssystem dr uppgifterna registeras.
The Commission addressed numerous queries to the Member States in 2004 and 2005 on inconsistencies in the data, but did not follow these up. 
Kommissionen snde ett flertal frgor till medlemsstaterna under 2004 och 2005 om bristande verensstmmelse mellan uppgifterna, men fljde inte upp dem.
Important data is lacking, particularly for the three largest fruit and vegetable producing Member States: Italy, Spain and France. 
Viktiga uppgifter saknas, srskilt fr de tre strsta frukt-och grnsaksproducerande medlemsstaterna: Italien, Spanien och Frankrike.
Analysis of the data is hampered by its incompleteness and the large number of inconsistencies, making it insufficiently reliable for indicating anything other than broad trends. 
Analysen av uppgifterna frsvras av att de inte r fullstndiga och av de mnga inkonsekvenserna, vilket gr att de inte r tillrckligt tillfrlitliga fr att kunna visa annat n allmnna trender.
The main indicator that can be derived from this data is the share of producer organisationsŐ output in the EU total. 
Den viktigaste indikator som kan hrledas frn uppgifterna gller producentorganisationernas andel av den totala EU-produktionen.
It also indicates the broader success of the policy by showing what proportion of fruit and vegetable growers choose to participate in the EU aid scheme. 
Den r ocks en indikation p politikens framgng i vidare bemrkelse genom att den visar den andel av frukt-och grnsaksod-larna som har valt att delta i EU:s stdsystem.
In the 2005 budget documents the Commission set a target of 60 % for this indicator by 2013, with an annual increase. 
I budgetdokumenten fr 2005 faststllde kommissionen ett ml p 60 % fr denna indikator till 2013, med en rlig kning.
Consequently, while it has data on withdrawals and the concentration of supply, the Commission has no indicators to show the progress made by producer organisations towards achieving the other policy objectives such as reducing costs, stabilising prices, improving quality and the environment. 
Kommissionen har fljaktligen uppgifter om tertagen och om koncentration av utbudet men den har inga indikatorer som visar producentorganisationernas framsteg mot att frverkliga de vriga politiska mlen, ssom att minska kostnaderna, stabilisera priserna och frbttra kvaliteten och miljn.
Analysis of data on withdrawals of surplus produce 75. 
Analys av uppgifter om tertag av verskottsproduktion 75.
The reform of the fruit and vegetable policy in 1996 limited the quantities of surplus produce that could be disposed of under the withdrawals aid scheme, and cut the compensation paid to growers for those withdrawals. 
Genom reformen av politiken fr frukt-och grnsaker 1996 begrnsades den kvantitet verskottsproduktion som man kunde gra sig av med genom systemet fr finansiering av ter-tag, och den kompensation som betalades till odlare fr tertag minskades.
The Commission data shows that this has resulted in a substantial reduction in the quantities of withdrawals within the EU aid scheme (Diagram 10). 
Kommissionens uppgifter visar att detta har lett till en vsentlig minskning av de tertagna kvantiteterna i EU:s stdsystem (se diagram 10).
This is in line with the result of the CourtŐs sample that 90 % of producer organisations had reduced withdrawals, or maintained them at zero. 
Detta verensstmmer med revisionsrttens urval, dr 90 % av producentorganisationerna hade minskat tertagen, eller hllit dem p noll.
Diagram 10 Withdrawals of fruit and vegetables for which aid was paid 1994-2004 (EU 15) 76. One of the objectives set for the operational programme aid scheme was to support measures taken by producer organisations to reduce withdrawals. 
Diagram 10 tertag av frukt och grnsaker fr vilka std betalades 1994Đ2004 (EU-15) 76. samhetsprogram var att stdja tgrder som vidtas av producentorganisationer fr att minska tertagen.
However, this reduction in withdrawals does not necessarily prove that the operational programme aid has resulted in producer organisations planning and adjusting their production to the demand: producer organisations explained that the reduced aid rates for withdrawals phased in since 1996, together with increased controls, make it no longer worthwhile to claim the aid on their surplus production. 
Denna minskning av tertagen bevisar dock inte ndvndigtvis att verksamhetsprogrammens std har lett till att producentorganisationerna planerar och anpassar sin produktion till efterfrgan; producentorganisationerna frklarade att de snkta stdsatserna fr tertag som infrts stegvis sedan 1996, i kombination med kade kontroller, gr att det inte lngre lnar sig att begra bidrag fr sin verskottsproduktion.
Analysis of data on the concentration of supply 77. 
Analys av uppgifterna om koncentrationen av utbudet 77.
The policy introduced in 1996 should result in a situation where the aid helps producer organisations to adapt and succeed and other growers are encouraged to join. 
Den politik som infrdes 1996 br leda till en situation dr stdet hjlper producentorganisationerna att anpassa sig och lyckas, s att andra odlare uppmuntras att ansluta sig.
Both of these factors should increase the turnover of producer organisations, Ôconcentrating supplyŐ in their hands. 
Bda dessa faktorer br ka producentorganisationernas omsttning och Ókoncentrera utbudetÓ till dem. Ett av de ml som sattes upp fr stdsystemet fr verk-
C 282/48 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.11.2006 Diagram 11 Share of producer organisations in total value of marketed production (EU 15) 78. 
C 282/48 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.11.2006 Diagram 11 Producentorganisationernas andel av det totala vrdet av den salufrda produktionen (EU-15) 78.
However, the CommissionŐs data shows that the concentration of supply indicator has decreased: producer organisationsŐ share of the total output fell from 40 % in 1999 to 31 % in 2003 (Diagram 11). 
Kommissionens uppgifter visar dock en minskning nr det gller indikatorn fr koncentration av utbudet: producentorganisationernas andel av den totala produktionen fll frn 40 % 1999 till 31 % 2003 (se diagram 11).
(The figure shown for 2004 is provisional, as two of the largest Member States, France and Italy, have not reported complete data). 
(Siffrorna fr 2004 r preliminra eftersom tv av de strsta medlemsstaterna, Frankrike och Italien, inte har lmnat fullstndiga uppgifter).
While the value of marketed production of the total fruit and vegetable sector increased by 45 % from 1999 to 2003, that of producer organisations increased by only 12 %. 
Samtidigt som vrdet av den salufrda produktionen inom hela frukt-och grnsakssektorn kade med 45 % frn 1999 till 2003 kade vrdet av producentorganisationernas salufrda produktion endast med 12 %.
As described in paragraph 72, it is not possible to place too much reliance on this data, other than to indicate the broad trend. 
Som beskrevs i punkt 72 kan man inte fsta alltfr stor vikt vid dessa uppgifter, de r en indikation p den allmnna trenden.
The 2003 percentage was incorrectly reported by the Commission, for example, because of an error concerning missing data for Greece. While the Court was able to easily find and correct this, the Commission could not demonstrate to the Court that the other data is sufficiently reliable. 
Procentandelen fr 2003 till exempel, rapporterades felaktigt av kommissionen till fljd av ett fel som gllde uppgifter fr Grekland som saknades. ven om revisionsrtten snabbt kunde finna och korrigera detta, kunde kommissionen inte bevisa fr revisionsrtten att vriga uppgifter r tillrckligt tillfrlitliga.
The data also shows the continuing geographical disparity in participation in the aid scheme (Diagram 12). 
Uppgifterna visar ocks de fortsatta geografiska skillnaderna i deltagande i stdsystemet (se diagram 12).
Portugal and Greece, the Member States in which fruit and vegetables represents the largest share of agricultural output, have the lowest participation rates, and have not shown any significant increase. 
Portugal och Grekland, som r de medlemsstater som har den hgsta andelen frukt och grnsaker i sin jordbruksproduktion, har det lgsta deltagandet, och det har inte funnits tecken p kning.
Because of this low participation in producer organisations, only 6 % of PortugalŐs fruit and vegetable sector receives aid for operational programmes, and 13 % in Greece compared to 80 % in the Netherlands. 
P grund av detta lga deltagande i producentorganisationer fr endast 6 % av Portugals frukt-och grnsakssektor std fr verksamhetsprogram, och 13 % i Grekland, jmfrt med 80 % i Nederlnderna.
The design of the aid scheme, which rewards success by paying aid as a percentage of producer organisationsŐ turnover, should create an incentive for smaller producers with lower value production, and with the most need for adapting to the marketŐs increasing quality and environmental standards and concentrated demand, to join producer organisations. 
Stdsystemets utformning som belnar framgng genom att stdet betalas som en procentandel av producentorganisationernas omsttning borde skapa incitament fr mindre producenter med produktion av lgre vrde, som har strst behov av att anpassa sig till marknadens allt hgre kvalitets-och miljnormer samt koncentrerade utbud, att g med i producentorganisationer.
The data shows that in some Member States, this has not happened. 
Uppgifterna visar att i ngra medlemsstater har detta inte skett.
Instead the scheme has had the result of directing the aid to large producer organisations with high value production. 
I stllet har stdsystemet lett till att stdet riktas till stora producentorganisationer som har produktion av hgt vrde.
The Commission lacks information on the differences in performance of producer organisations and other growers and so cannot explain why the sector outside producer organisations appears to be growing at a faster rate than producer organisations. 
Kommissionen saknar information om skillnaderna i resultat mellan producentorganisationer och andra odlare och kan drfr inte frklara varfr sektorn utanfr producentorganisationer frefaller vxa i snabbare takt n producentorganisationerna.
To explain the lack of progress in the concentration of supply, it is also necessary to find out why growers do not join producer organisations. 
Fr att frklara de bristande framstegen nr det gller att koncentrera utbudet r det ocks ndvndigt att ta reda p varfr odlare inte gr med i producentorganisationer.
The Commission has not questioned producers in any systematic way to find the real reasons for this. 
Kommissionen har inte p ett systematiskt stt frgat producenterna om detta fr att ta reda p de verkliga orsakerna.
In its reply to the CourtŐs Annual Report 2000, the Commission stated Ôif the majority of producers ... prefer not to join an effective producer organisation, they must also take the consequences of their decision. 
I sitt svar p revisionsrttens rsrapport fr 2000 sade kommissionen att Óom merparten av producenterna (...) fredrar att inte ansluta sig till en effektivt fungerande producentorganisation, mste de ocks ta konsekvenserna av detta beslut.
20.11.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 282/49 Diagram 12 Producer organisationsŐ share of the total value of marketed production 2000-2004 Rural development 84. 
20.11.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 282/49 Diagram 12 Producentorganisationernas andel av det totala vrdet av den salufrda produktionen 2000Đ2004 Landsbygdsutveckling 84.
One particular risk, identified by the Commission at an early stage, is that the availability of rural development funding may have undermined the incentive to join or form producer organisations by offering aid similar to operational programmes without requiring the growers to be members of producer organisations (see Text box 18). 
En srskild risk, som kommissionen tidigt identifierade, r att tillgngen till medel fr landsbygdsutveckling kan ha frsvagat incitamentet att g med i eller bilda producentorganisationer genom att det erbjuds std som pminner om verksamhetsprogram men som inte krver att odlarna skall vara medlemmar i producentorganisationer (se textruta 18).
Although the rural development regulation addressed this issue (by providing that fruit and vegetable producers are not eligible for rural development aid to the extent that similar aid is available under operational programmes), exceptions were allowed. 
Trots att detta togs upp i frordningen om landsbygdsutveckling (genom att det faststlldes att frukt-och grnsksproducenter inte r berttigade till std fr landsbygdsutveckling i den mn liknande std finns tillgngligt inom verksamhetsprogram) var undantag tilltna.
As a result of these exceptions, Rural Development funding is available for a similar range of activities, from irrigation projects to packaging machinery, for producer organisations and other growers alike. 
Till fljd av dessa undantag r medel fr landsbygdsutveckling tillgngliga fr liknande typer av verksamhet, frn bevattningsprojekt till frpackningsmaskiner, fr bde producentorganisationer och andra odlare.
A significant proportion of Rural Development projects under the measures Ôinvestments in agricultural holdingsŐ and Ôimproving the processing and marketing of agricultural productsŐ concern fruit and vegetables. 
En vsentlig andel av projekten fr landsbygdsutveckling inom tgrderna ÓInvesteringar i jordbruksfretagÓ och ÓFrbttring av bearbetningen och marknadsfringen av jordbruksprodukterÓ handlar om frukt och grnsaker.
Despite the potential importance of the risk of the Rural Development programmes undermining producer organisations, which are the cornerstone of the EUŐs policy for fruit and vegetable producers, the Commission has not checked the operation of Member StatesŐ procedures for ensuring consistency, or collected information or undertaken any assessment of the extent to which this may have occurred. 
Trots den potentiella betydelsen av risken fr att program fr landsbygdsutveckling frsvagar producentorganisationerna, som r hrnstenen i EU:s politik fr frukt-och grnsaksodlare, har kommissionen inte kontrollerat hur medlemsstaternas frfaranden fr att garantera konsekvens fungerar, eller samlat in uppgifter om eller gjort ngon utvrdering av i vilken utstrckning detta kan ha intrffat.
Member States have focused on the eligibility of operational programme actions by the nature of the expenditure, without also considering whether they represent a step forward for the producer organisation towards achieving the operational programme objectives. 
Medlemsstaterna har inriktat sig p stdberttigandet fr tgrder i verksamhetsprogram enligt typ av utgift utan att ocks vervga om tgrderna innebr ett steg framt fr producentorganisationen mot att frverkliga verksamhetsprogrammets ml.
As a result, Member StatesŐ procedures do not Text box 18 Key features of the two aid schemes Aid only available to producer organisations? 
Fljaktligen garanterar inte medlemsstaternas frfaranden att Textruta 18 Vsentliga delar i de tv stdsystemen Std endast tillgngligt fr produ-centorganisationer?
Multiannual programme? 
Flerriga program?