natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This provision implies that the project-based approach is to be supplemented by a more general analysis of the impact of CF-financed projects on certain variables, such as growth, employment and trade, in the economies concerned. This analysis should take into account the short-term incidence of the measures in question on demand, which is felt mainly during the execution phase, and the medium and long-termeffectsonsupply,whichfirstbecomeapparentduring the operational phase. 
Denna bestmmelse innebr att den projektbaserade metoden skall kompletteras av en mer vergripande analys av effekterna av de projekt som finansieras av Sammanhllningsfonden p variabler ssom tillvxt, sysselsttning och handel i de berrda ekonomierna och som tar hnsyn till dessa tgrders kortsiktiga effekter p efterfrgan, vilka huvudsakligen mrks under genomfrandefasen, och medellngsiktiga och lngsiktiga effekter p utbudet som kommer till uttryck frn och med brjan av den operativa fasen.
In order to be able to satisfy these requirements of the Regulation, the Commission signed two contracts with a consultant. 
Fr att kunna uppfylla dessa krav i frordningen har kommissionen ingtt tv avtal med en konsult.
The first, dated 3 July 1995, for an amount of EUR 675 965, was for the development of methods of evaluating the macroeconomic impact of CF projects. 
Det frsta som hrrr frn den 3 juli 1995 och omfattar ett belopp p 675 965 euro bestod i utveckling av metoder fr utvrdering av den makroekonomiska effekten av Sammanhllningsfondens projekt.
The second, dated 1 April 1997, for an amount of EUR 283 500, essentially concerned the collection of new data to allow new project evaluations. 
Det andra, som ingicks den 1 april 1997 och omfattade ett belopp p 283 500 euro, avsg frmst insamling av nya data fr att kunna genomfra nya utvrderingar av projekten.
The specifications for the first contract were based on a feasibility study carried out in 1994 by the same consultant on the same subject and took over the same proposed structure and the same evaluation criteria. 
Specifikationerna fr det frsta avtalet, vilka grundades p en genomfrbarhetsstudie som gjordes 1994 av samma konsult och avsg samma mne, utformades enligt samma frordade struktur och samma urvalskriterier.
The Commission did not consider that this unusual situation posed any problems. 
Kommissionen ansg inte att denna speciella situation medfrde ngra problem.
Most of the modelling approaches proposed by the various applicants in connection with the call for tenders were already familiar and were all considered by the Commission to be suitable for evaluating project impact, as the Commission had not adopted any special criteria for appraising these approaches. 
De till strsta delen redan knda modellmetoder som presenterats av de olika skande inom ramen fr anbudsinfordran betraktades alla av kommissionen som lmpliga fr utvrderingen av projektens effekter, eftersom kommissionen inte hade antagit ngra srskilda kriterier fr bedmning av dessa metoder.
In the end the Commission took the consultant who submitted one of the highest bids and whose approach excelled by virtue of its originality, but had still not been tested in practice as far as its applicability was concerned. 
Kommissionen bestmde sig slutligen fr den konsult som lagt fram ett av de dyraste erbjudandena och vars metod utmrkte sig genom sin originalitet, men vars anvndbarhet nnu inte belagts genom konkreta erfarenheter.
A sub-sequentmodificationofthefirstcontractissigned,butnotdated, and extends by three months the time allowed for performance, so extending the total duration to 15 months. 
Genom ett undertecknat men inte daterat tillgg till det frsta avtalet frlngdes tidsramen fr utfrandet av tjnsterna med tre mnader, vilket innebar en total tidsram p 15 mnader.
This extension devalues de facto the initial criteria for the awarding of the contract, given that the tender selection procedure had included consideration of tenderersŐ ability to complete the study within the time allowed and, in addition, there was no provision for penalties in case of overruns. 
Denna frlngning minskar i praktiken vrdet hos de ursprungliga kriterierna fr tilldelning eftersom det vid valet av anbud tagits srskild hnsyn till anbudsgivarens frmga att avsluta analysen inom angiven tid (ngra straffavgifter fr frsening var fr vrigt inte freskrivna).
This should have led to an amendment of the contract. 
Detta borde ha lett till en ndring av avtalet.
The second contract signed by the Commission was in response to a proposal from the same consultant, suggesting that the use of the models created under the first contract should be extended to all the CF measures, so that the consultant would be able to estimate the short, medium and long-term impact of projects on key economic variables such as income, regional growth, private investment and employment. 
Det andra avtalet som undertecknades av kommissionen var en fljd av ett frslag frn samme konsult som freslog en utvidgning av tilllmpningen av de modeller som skapats inom ramen fr det frsta avtalet till att omfatta samtliga Sammanhllningsfondens tgrder fr att p kort, medellng och lng sikt kunna utvrdera projektens effekter p ekonomiska nyckelvariabler ssom inkomster, regional tillvxt, privata investeringar och sysselsttning.
This extension to the contract ought not to have been necessary, since the first contract had already provided that the Commission was to be supplied with an adequate, operational tool (models and database), so that it could ascertain the impact of the CF for itself. 
Denna utvidgning av avtalet hade egentligen inte varit ndvndig eftersom det frsta avtalet redan freskrev att kommissionen skulle frses med ett lmpligt och anvndbart instrument (modeller och en databas) fr att sjlv kunna bedma effekterna av Sammanhllningsfonden.
In fact, the contracts specify on each occasion that all the results obtained by the contractor, as well as the software needed for the application and the database created for that purpose, are the property of the Commission. 
I sjlva verket fastsls det i de olika avtalen att samtliga resultat som uppdragstagaren kommit fram till liksom de erforderliga dataprogrammen och den databas som inrttats fr detta ndaml r kommissionens egendom.
The expenditure associated with the first contract amounted to EUR 674 403,98. 
Utgifterna inom ramen fr det frsta avtalet uppgick till 674 403,98 euro.
Examination of the service providersŐ travel expenses showed that in many cases the Commission refunded the cost of travel by air in business class, whereas Annex IV to the contract stipulated in Article 1(a) that travel expenses would be refunded up to the price of economy-class tickets. 
Granskningen av uppdragstagarens resekostnader har visat att kommissionen i flera fall betalat ut ersttning fr flygresor i businessclass, trots att det i artikel 1a, bilaga IV i avtalet fastsls att ersttning betalas ut fr resor till ekonomiklasspris.
In the case of thesecondcontract,whichwassignedon1April1997andseta time limit of 31 March 2000 for performance, there were no payments until 31 January 2000. 
Fr det andra avtalet som undertecknades den 1 april 1997 och vars slutdatum fr genomfrande bestmts till den 31 mars 2000 har inga betalningar skett per den 31 januari 2000.
Conformity with the evaluation objectives 77. 
Uppfyllande av mlen fr utvrdering 77.
In order to establish a coherent framework for analysing the impact of CF expenditure in the four countries concerned the consultant referred to in paragraph 72 adopted an innovative 
I syfte att upprtta en sammanhngande ram fr analysen av effekterna av Sammanhllningsfondens utgifter i de fyra berrda lnderna tillmpade den konsult som nmns i punkt 72 en innovativ metod, vilken bestod i anvndningen av tre metoder som kompletterade varandra: autoregressiva vektorsmodeller (ARV),
C 279/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.10.2000 approach, using three complementary methods vector autore-gression models (VAR), regional computable general equilibrium models (CGE) and models of explicit distribution dynamics (MEDD). 
C 279/20 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 2.10.2000 modeller fr allmn jmvikt som kan berknas p regional niv (AJB) och dynamiska modeller fr formell frdelning (DMFF).
The models are described in more detail in the Annex. 
Dessa modeller presenteras nrmare i bilagan.
The analysis required by the models was, amongst other things, to provide answers to the following three questions. How do the measures assisted under the Fund, together or individually, influence the economies of the four cohesion countries? 
Den analys som dessa modeller krvde skulle srskilt gra det mjligt att svara p fljande frgor: Hur pverkar tgrderna inom ramen fr fonden tillsammans eller var och en fr sig de fyra sammanhllningslndernas ekonomier?
What effectdoesthishaveonadjacenteconomiesandontheCommu-nity in general? 
Hur pverkar dessa effekter de angrnsande ekonomierna och gemenskapen i allmn-het?
What is the impact of the measures on the economic and social cohesion of the Union? 
Vilka effekter fr dessa tgrder p den ekonomiska och sociala sammanhllningen i unionen?
The MDRF models were not, in fact, used to evaluate the impact of CF projects directly. 
DMFF-modellerna har inte anvnts fr att direkt utvrdera effekterna av Sammanhllningsfondens projekt.
They are concerned with the dynamics of growth and convergence of all the regions of the four cohesion countries, as well as of other countries like France, the United Kingdom and Italy, and are used to examine questions such as the tendency of regional incomes to converge or diverge over time and the dynamic in the regional distribution of income. 
De r inriktade p dynamiken i tillvxten och konvergensen i samtliga av de fyra sammanhllningslndernas regioner, samt i andra lnder ssom Frankrike, Frenade kungariket och Italien, och anvnds fr att utreda frgor ssom tendenser till konvergens och divergens i den regionala inkomsten under en bestmd tidsperiod och dynamiken i den regionala frdelningen av inkomsterna.
They show that the increasing inequality can be explained by the fact that the growth achieved by groups of neighbouring regions is different from that of other adjacent groups and that the performance of one region can be explained by neighbouring regions. 
De visar att de kande skillnaderna frklaras av att grupper av grannregioner noterar en tillvxt som skiljer sig frn tillvxten bland andra angrnsande grupper och att resultatet i en region beror p angrnsande regioner.
Furthermore, the results concerning spillover from public and private investmentcouldbetakenintoaccountforanappraisaloftheCF projects carried out in the period 1993 to 1999. 
Vidare skulle man vid en utvrdering av projekt inom ramen fr Sammanhllningsfonden som genomfrts under perioden 1993Đ1999 kunna ta hnsyn till resultaten av analysen av de offentliga och privata investeringarnas terverkningar.
The aim of the VAR and CGE models was to evaluate the impacts of individual projects from a number of viewpoints, including the effects on the region directly concerned, the spill-over onto other regions and the whole economy and the impact on cohesion and convergence. 
Modellerna ARV och AJB har som ml att utvrdera effekterna av enskilda projekt ur olika perspektiv, i synnerhet effekterna p den region som direkt berrs, terverkningarna p andra regioner och ekonomin som helhet samt effekterna p sammanhllningen och konvergensen.
These models can provide additional answers and the results which they give, when they are comparable, are usually consistent. 
Dessa modeller gr det mjligt att f fram kompletterande svar och deras respektive resultat r i allmnhet samstmmiga nr de kan jmfras med varandra.
A more complete application of these models might have been useful. 
En mer fullstndig tillmpning av dessa modeller hade varit p sin plats.
For example, VAR2, which is more complete than VAR1 from the modelling viewpoint, was applied only to the Spanish regions, because they were able to provide more, detailed information in terms of historical series. 
Modellen ARV2, som i modellutformningshnseende r mer fullstndig n ARV1, har endast anvnts i de spanska regionerna eftersom dessa kunnat ge mer uttmmande och utfrliga uppgifter betrffande historiska tendenser.
Likewise, the CGE model, which takes a large regional breakdown into account, could be used to analyse the implications of the CF for regional inequality in the cohesion countries. 
Likas skulle modellen AJB, som bygger p en tydlig regional uppdelning, kunna anvndas fr att analysera Sammanhllningsfondens konsekvenser fr de regionala skillnaderna i sammanhllningslnderna.
These models have their limitations as regards evaluating the impact of environmental projects and are more suitable for transport infrastructure projects. 
Dessa modeller har sina begrnsningar nr det gller att utvrdera effekterna av miljprojekt och lmpar sig bttre fr projekt p omrdet fr transportinfrastruktur.
Furthermore, the selection of projects analysed by means of these models gave preference to transport infrastructure projects. 82. 
Urvalet av projekt som analyserats med hjlp av dessa modeller gynnade fr vrigt projekt p omrdet fr transportinfrastruktur.
Even though these models (VAR, CGE and MEDD) provide useful and interesting results about the potential impact of CF intervention and thus help towards a better understanding of the related effects, there is no real coordination between the models used. 
82. ven om dessa modeller (ARV, AJB, DMFF) leder till intressanta och anvndbara analysresultat avseende sammanhllnings-fondstgrdernas inverkan och drmed bidrar till en bttre frstelse av de drav fljande effekterna, sker ingen verklig samordning mellan de modeller som anvnds.
Furthermore, none of the models specifies, for the results obtained, the level of imprecision that is due to the poor quality or availability of the data collected or to the limits of the extrapolation methods used. 
Ingen av modellerna visar heller graden av inexakthet hos resultaten beroende p lg kvalitet eller bristande tillgnglighet hos de insamlade uppgifterna eller p begrnsningarna i de metoder fr extrapolering som anvnts.
The Commission did not carry out any reconciliation of the results obtained from these models and did not carry out the necessary harmonisation of them in order to establish overall conclusions in terms of the CFŐs impact on the economies of the four cohesion countries. 
Kommissionen har inte genomfrt ngon avstmning av de resultat som erhllits med hjlp av dessa modeller eller den ndvndiga harmoniseringen av desamma i syfte att n fram till allmnna slutsatser rrande Sammanhllningsfondens effekter p de fyra sammanhllningslndernas ekonomier.
The results produced by each model separately are generally positive. 
De resultat som erhllits separat med hjlp av varje enskild modell r i allmnhet positiva.
Models developed on Member StatesŐ initiative 83. 
Modeller som utvecklats p medlemsstaternas initiativ 83.
Only Spain has used CF financial support to carry out a study of the overall macroeconomic impact of the CF on the national economy. 
Endast Spanien har med finansiellt bidrag frn Sammanhllningsfonden genomfrt en studie av fondens totala makroekonomiska effekter p den nationella ekonomin.
The approach that was adopted for this study, which was presented in November 1995, was to use three models (Input/output, Moisees and Hermin) (see the Annex). 
Den metod som anvndsidennastudie,vilkenladesframinovember1995, byggde p anvndningen av tre modeller (Input/Output, Moisees och Hermin) (se bilaga). 84.
The other cohesion countries have not produced any special studies at national or regional level on the macroeconomic impact of projects, or of the CF itself. 
De vriga sammanhllningslnderna har inte gjort ngra srskilda studier p nationell eller regional niv av de makroekonomiska effekterna av projekten eller av sjlva Sammanhllningsfonden.
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) 85. 
Kostnads-/intktsanalys 85.
When the projects submitted by the Member States concerned are being examined, cost-benefit analysis is one of the main criteria for the decision on whether to grant Community assistance. 
Vid granskningen av de projekt som lagts fram av de berrda medlemsstaterna hr kostnads-/intktsanalysen till de huvudsakliga kriterierna fr beslut om beviljande av gemenskapsstd.
The Commission can, if necessary, call on the European Investment Bank to assist in the project evaluation (see paragraph 15). 
Kommissionen kan vid behov ta hjlp av Europeiska investeringsbanken vid bedmningen av projekt (se punkt 15).
In the field of transport infrastructure the CBAs are usually based on long experience and a well-established methodology which allows, amongst other things, quantification of all the necessary parameters. 
P omrdet fr transportinfrastruktur grundas kostnads-/intktsanalyserna i allmnhet p lng erfarenhet och vl utvecklade metoder som framfr allt gr det mjligt att kvantifiera samtliga erforderliga parametrar.
In the environment field, on the other hand, the difficulty of quantifying the expected benefits has often led Member States to use methods of a more qualitative and less quantitative nature. 
P miljomrdet har dremot svrigheten att kvantifiera de frvntade vinsterna ofta lett till att medlemsstaterna anvnt sig av metoder av kvalitativ snarare n kvantitativ karaktr.
2.10.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 279/21 87. 
2.10.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 279/21 87.
If the Commission finds the CBA insufficient or unconvinc-ing it may ask the Member States to provide additional information or to extend the analysis, and this may lead to a redefinition of the projects in question or, even, ultimately to a refusal of Community funding for certain projects. 
Om kostnads-/intktsanalysen bedms som otillrcklig eller fga vertygande av kommissionen kan denna begra kompletterande uppgifter eller utvidgade analyser av medlemsstaterna, vilka kan leda till att de berrda projekten omdefinieras eller till och med att vissa projekt nekas gemenskapsfinansiering.
Examination of the CBAs showed that despite the CommissionŐs efforts in the matter (notably the publication in June 1997 of a guide to the analysis of the costs and benefits of large-scale projects within the Community regional framework), the treatment and calculation of socioeconomic variables can differ widely between promoters within the same sectoral field and the same Member State. 
Granskningen av kostnads-/intktsanalyserna har visat att bearbetningen och berkningen av de socioekonomiska variablerna trots de anstrngningar som gjorts av kommissionen p omrdet, srskilt genom offentliggrandet av en kostnads-/ intktsanalys fr de strre projekten inom ramen fr gemenskapens regionalpolitik i juni 1997, kan variera kraftigt mellan enskilda projektledare inom samma sektor och i samma medlemsstat.
Basic CBA concepts (net present value, internal rate of return, discountrate,constantorcurrentprices,taxaspects,sensitivity analysis (1), etc.) are not always understood in the same way by the parties concerned. 
De grundlggande begreppen p omrdet fr kostnads-/ intktsanalys (diskonterat nettovrde, intern rntabilitet, diskonto, fasta och lpande priser, skatteaspekter, knslighetsanalys (1), osv.) uppfattas inte alltid p samma stt av de olika aktrerna.
External factors are often insufficiently evaluated and quantified. 
De yttre faktorerna utvrderas och kvantifieras ofta inte i tillrcklig grad.
The socioeconomic costs or benefits are sometimes incomplete and sometimes only the financial aspects are taken into account. 
Dokumenteringen av de socioekonomiska kostnaderna och frdelarna r ofta ofullstndig och i vissa fall beaktas endast de finansiella aspekterna.
Moreover the CBAs do not always include precise and detailed information that would make it possible to verify, amongst other things, their reliability. 
Vidare tfljs kostnads-/ intktsanalyserna inte alltid av exakta och utfrliga uppgifter som framfr allt skulle gra det mjligt att kontrollera deras tillfrlitlighet.
Thus in the case of the Lisbon water-distribution network project it was not possible to establish any link between the revenue received by the final beneficiary over all the networks and the investment financed by the CF. 
Betrffande projektet ÓVattenledningsnt i LissabonÓ var det sledes inte mjligt att faststlla ngot samband mellan den slutlige stdmottagarens intkter frn samtliga nt och den investering som finansierats av Sammanhllningsfonden.
For the drinking-water treatment plants, the Ibiza-desalination plant project, the price of water was calculated in 1994 as 95 ESP/m3 (approximately 0,48 EUR/m3) in the CBA, whereas the real price was, for 1997, 213,84 ESP/m3 (approximately 1,07 EUR/m3). 
Fr projektet Óreningsverk fr framstllning av dricksvatten och saltborttag-ningsanlggning p IbizaÓ berknades vattenpriset 1994 till 95 ESP/m3 (cirka 0,48 euro/m3) i kostnads-/intktsanalysen, medan det verkliga priset uppgick till 213,84 ESP/m3 fr 1997 (cirka 1,07 euro/m3).
The CBA for the Limerick City Water Supply Project did not take into account private-sector revenue, which amounted to around IEP 1,2 million (approximately EUR 1,6 million) in 1997. 
I kostnads-/intktsanalysen fr projektet fr vattenfrsrjning i Limerick tas ingen hnsyn till inkomsterna frn den privata sektorn, vilka 1997 uppgick till 1,2 miljoner irlndska pund (cirka 1,6 miljoner euro).
For the same project the IRT was calculated on the basis of a 25-year period, whereas the lifetime of the associated buildings was assumed to be 50 years. 
Fr samma projekt berknas internrntan p grundval av en 25-rsperiod, trots att livslngden fr anlggningar som uppfrts inom projektets faststllts till 50 r.
Only the financial aspects were considered in the CBA of the Tralee landfill site project, which ignored the socioeconomic aspects. 
Betrffande projektet ÓTralee landfill siteÓ har endast de finansiella aspekterna beaktats i kostnads-/intktsanalysen, medan de socioekonomiska aspekterna frbisetts.
The Belview rail crossing project does not contain an IRT calculation and states only that economic benefits are expected in terms of time saving, without quantifying them. 
Fr projektet ÓBelview Rail CrossingÓ har internrntan inte berknats. Det anges endast att projektet frvntas innebra ekonomiska frdelar i form av tids-vinster, utan att dessa frdelar kvantifieras.
(1) Sensitivity analysis: study of the possible effect of a change in crucial estimates relating to costs and benefits on the profitability or actual value of a project. 
(1) Knslighetsanalys Đ studie av de effekter p ett projekts rntabilitet eller realvrde som kan orsakas av ndringar i de viktigaste kostnadsberkningarna.
The CBA for the Autoroute Pathe-F-Pont project estimated an investment cost of around EUR 4 million, whereas the construction contract signed was for an amount of some EUR 2,3 million. 
I kostnads-/intktsanalysen fr projektet Ómotorvg Pathe-bro FÓ uppskattades investeringskostnaden till cirka 4 miljoner euro, medan det byggnadsavtal som undertecknats uppgick till cirka 2,3 miljoner euro.
This disparity between design and interpretation in relation to the application of CBAs tends to produce results which differ according to the hypotheses adopted and may distort the appraisal of the benefits or drawbacks of a given project relative to others. 
Dessa olika uppfattningar och tolkningar rrande utfrandet av kostnads-/intktsanalyserna leder till resultat som skiljer sig t beroende p vilka hypoteser som tillmpas och kan resultera i en felaktig bedmning av frdelarna och nackdelarna med ett projekt i frhllande till andra projekt.
Indicators 93. 
Indikatorer 93.