natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Following a public tendering procedure, a principal consultant was selected for each specified set of objectives and Community initiatives. 
Efter ett offentligt upphandlingsfrfarande valdes en huvudkonsult ut fr varje specificerad uppsttning ml och gemenskapsinitiativ.
In most cases, the consultant was supported by a team of evaluators in the individual Member States (3) whose role was to undertake the necessary evaluations of the respective programmes on the basis of a common methodological framework. 
I de flesta fall bistods konsulten av ett team av utvrderare i de enskilda medlemsstaterna (3) vilkas roll var att utfra de ndvndiga utvrderingarna av respektive program p grundval av en gemensam metodram.
Moreover, the evaluation process was monitored by a steering group. 
Dessutom vervakades utvrderingsprocessen av en styrgrupp.
The evaluations resulted in national reports prepared by the national evaluators and a Synthesis Report prepared by the contracted consultants for each specified set of objectives. 
Utvrderingarna resulterade i nationella rapporter som utarbetades av de nationella utvrderarna och en sammanfattande rapport som utarbetades av de inhyrda konsulterna fr varje specificerad uppsttning ml.
These reports were completed between early 2003 and mid 2004. 
Dessa rapporter frdigstlldes mellan brjan av 2003 och mitten av 2004.
The basic objectives established for each evaluation 7. 
Grundlggande ml fr varje utvrdering 7.
The DGs involved opted for a wide-ranging approach covering a broad list of issues. 
De generaldirektorat som var inblandade valde ett vittomspnnande frfaringsstt som tckte en rad olika frgor.
The overall objectives of the evaluations were to: (a) assess the results and impacts of the operations in the Member States vis--vis their objectives and impacts on persons and systems; (1) Comprising the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), the European Agriculture Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG). (2) Synthesis Report, p. 
De vergripande mlen fr utvrderingarna var att a) bedma resultaten och effekterna av insatserna i medlemsstaterna i frhllande till mlen och effekterna fr personer och system, (1) Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden (ERUF), Europeiska socialfonden (ESF), Europeiska utvecklings-och garantifonden fr jordbruket (EUGFJ) och fonden fr fiskets utveckling (FFU). (2) Sammanfattande rapport, s.
(3) Hereafter referred to as Ônational evaluatorsŐ. (b) analyse the impact and effectiveness of the Community actions on specific structural problems and, as far as possible, to ascertain the Community value added of assistance. 8. 
(3) Nedan kallade Ónationella utvrderareÓ. b) analysera gemenskapsinsatsernas effekt och ndamlsenlighet nr det gller specifika strukturella problem och i mjligaste mn bedma det mervrde gemenskapsstdet har tillfrt. 8.
To structure the work, the terms also established a number of specified tasks and identified a certain number of techniques and sources of information. 
Fr att strukturera arbetet faststlldes ocks i uppdragsbeskrivningen ett antal specificerade uppgifter, och ett visst antal tekniker och informationskllor identifierades.
The ToR for each objective, as compiled by the Commission, thus provided the basis for the work of the evaluators. 
Uppdragsbeskrivningen fr varje ml, ssom kommissionen utarbetat den, lg allts till grund fr utvrderarnas arbete.
These were complemented by the inception report and the methodology guide for Objective 1, in January 2002. 
Den kompletterades av den inledande rapporten och metodguiden fr ml 1 i januari 2002.
For ESF operations, they were complemented by the methodological progress report, in December 2002, and the evaluation questions, included in each national evaluation report. 
Fr ESF-insatser kompletterades den av rapporten om metodens framskridande i december 2002 och av de utvrderingsfrgor som fanns med i varje nationell utvrderingsrapport.
For this purpose, the evaluators relied on literature reviews, questionnaires, stakeholder interviews, the analysis of case studies and other field research as deemed necessary. 
Fr detta syfte frlitade sig utvrderarna p dokumentgranskningar, enkter, intervjuer med berrda aktrer, analyser av fallstudier och andra underskningar p fltet som bedmdes vara ndvndiga.
AUDIT SCOPE 10. 
GRANSKNINGENS OMFATTNING 10.
The general audit objectives were to examine if the evaluations provided the Commission with adequate information to estimate the effects of the interventions relative to the objectives and if the results and recommendations have been helpful for the revision of the programmes for subsequent programming periods. 
Granskningens vergripande ml var att underska om efterhandsutvrderingarna gav kommissionen tillrcklig information fr att bedma effekterna av stdtgrderna i relation till mlen och om resultaten och rekommendationerna var till hjlp fr versynen av programmen fr efterfljande programperioder.
The audit focused on the ex post evaluations concerning ERDF interventions under Objective 1 and ESF interventions under Objectives 1 and 3, undertaken respectively by the Directorate-General for Regional Policy (DG REGIO) and the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities (DG EMPL). 
Granskningen inriktades p de efterhandsutvrderingar av ERUF-stdtgrder inom ml 1 och ESF-stdtgrder inom ml 1 och ml 3 som gjorts av Generaldirektoratet fr regionalpolitik (GD Regionalpolitik) respektive av Generaldirektoratet fr sysselsttning, socialpolitik och lika mjligheter (GD Sysselsttning, socialpolitik och lika mjligheter).
The relevant Synthesis Reports and a sample of national evaluations were examined corresponding to these selected objectives and instruments (4) which, together, accounted for 124 billion euro, that is 82 % of the total scheduled aid under the SFs for the 1994 to 1999 programming period (5). 
Revisionsrtten granskade sammanfattande rapporter och ett urval nationella utvrderingar som avsg dessa utvalda ml och instrument (4) vilka tillsammans stod fr 124 miljarder euro, det vill sga 82 % av det totala planerade stdet frn strukturfonderna under programperioden 1994Đ1999 (5).
(4) National evaluations examined relate to: Objective 1 Belgium, Greece, Spain, Germany, Italy, Ireland, Portugal, and Objectives 1 and 3 (ESF): Spain, France, Italy, Germany, United Kingdom. 
(4) De granskade nationella utvrderingarna gller fljande lnder: Ml 1 Belgien, Grekland, Spanien, Tyskland, Italien, Irland och Portugal. Ml 1 och 3 (ESF): Spanien, Frankrike, Italien, Tyskland och Frenade kungariket.
(5) See paragraph 5 for the overall figures. 
(5) Se punkt 5 fr uppgifter om de totala beloppen.
12.12.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 302/7 12. 
12.12.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 302/7 12.
For each evaluation, the audit sought to answer three questions: (a) Was the evaluation of good quality? (b) To what extent were identified weaknesses due to deficiencies in the framework and supervision of the evaluation exercise? (c) Were the resulting recommendations well-based, useful and well-suited to be taken into account in the following programming periods? 
Vid granskningen stlldes tre frgor fr var och en av utvrderingarna: a) Hll utvrderingen god kvalitet? b) I vilken utstrckning berodde identifierade svagheter p brister i ramen och i vervakningen av utvrderingsarbetet? c) Var de slutliga rekommendationerna vlgrundade, anvndbara och vl lmpade att tas tillvara i de fljande programperioderna?
In particular, the audit assessed the quality and completeness of the reports in terms of their evaluation of the appropriateness of the policies, and the effectiveness, efficiency and impact of the measures, as well as how the measures impacted on the management systems. 
I synnerhet gjordes vid granskningen en bedmning av rapporternas kvalitet och fullstndighet nr det gller utvrderingen av politikens lmplighet, av tgrdernas ndamlsenlighet, effektivitet och effekt samt tgrdernas inverkan p frvaltnings-systemen.
It also assessed the adequacy of the CommissionŐs role in the prepartion, monitoring and supervision of the evaluations. 
Revisionsrtten bedmde ocks om kommissionens roll i frberedelserna, vervakningen och uppfljningen av utvrderingarna var adekvat.
The first part of this report is dedicated to the ex post evaluation of ERDF interventions in Objective 1 regions (paragraphs 15 to 80) while the second part covers the ex post evaluation of ESF operations under Objectives 1 and 3 (paragraphs 81 to 113). 
Den frsta delen av denna rapport gnas t efterhandsutvrderingen av ERUF-stdtgrder i ml 1-regioner (punkterna 15Đ80) och den andra delen gnas t efterhandsutvrderingen av ESF-insatser inom ml 1 och ml 3 (punkterna 81Đ113).
These are summarised hereunder (see Text box 1). 
Dessa slutsatser sammanfattas i textruta 1 nedan.
Text box 1 The overall conclusions of the evaluation by DG REGIO The Synthesis report recognised that the Structural Funds have had a positive impact on the GDP of the Objective 1 regions and that their overall performance, relative to the EU as a whole, has improved. 
Textruta 1 GD Regionalpolitiks allmnna slutsatser av utvrderingen I den sammanfattande rapporten konstateras att strukturfonderna har haft en positiv effekt p BNP i ml 1-regioner och att deras allmnna resultat fr hela EU har frbttrats.
It considered that the extent of the beneficial impact has been heavily dependent on both institutional capacities and factors such as the structure and openness of the economy and that Ôthese aspects are clearly crucial in particular to the capacity of the economy to respond to the challenges and opportunities of the process of economic inte-grationŐ. 
Enligt rapporten har omfattningen av de frdelaktiga effekterna i hg grad berott bde p institutionell kapacitet och faktorer som strukturen och ppenheten i ekonomin, och dessa aspekter r uppenbart viktiga i synnerhet fr ekonomins frmga att mta utmaningar och tillvarata mjligheter i den ekonomiska integrationsprocessen.
As an overall assessment of the appropriateness of the strategies adopted, the report concludes that the strategic approach to Objective 1 taken in 1994 must be Ôviewed as broadly appropriate in each of the Member StatesŐ. 
Som vergripande bedmning av de antagna strategiernas lmplighet dras i rapporten slutsatsen att det strategiska frfaringsstt fr ml 1 som antogs 1994 skall ses som p det hela taget lmpligt fr var och en av medlemsstaterna.
In its view: ÔThe most significant criticism of the strategies was that they did not constitute much more than the sum of their parts. 
Enligt rapporten var den viktigaste kritiken av strategierna att de inte utgjorde mycket mer n summan av sina delar.
Whilst each was an adequate response to the identified needs in particular fields, there was less indication as to how these different elements contributed towards an overarching development strategy.Ő In terms of effectiveness, the report indicated that the analysis relied to a substantial extent on Ôqualitative judgements rather than quantified comparisons of results with targetsŐ due to shortcomings in the available data. 
Var och en var ett tillrckligt svar p de identifierade behoven p olika omrden, men det fanns endast f indikationer p hur dessa olika element bidrog till en vergripande utvecklingsstrategi. Nr det gller ndamlsenlighet anges i rapporten att analysen p grund av brister i de tillgngliga uppgifterna i stor utstrckning byggde p kvalitativa bedmningar snarare n p kvantifierade jmfrelser mellan resultat och ml.
As a general comment, the report states that: ÔMany of the apparently most effective actions have been those of a largely Ňmainstream character.Ó Funding has largely tended to reinforce existing patterns of economic development related activity, rather than providing a basis for developing new activities to meet identified objectives or stimulating more innovative approaches.Ő In terms of impact, the report relied, for most regions, on a macro-modelling approach to assess the impact of the SFs on economic and social cohesion. 
Som en allmn kommentar sls det fast i rapporten att mnga av de uppenbarligen mest ndamlsenliga insatserna har varit av ÓkonventionellÓ karaktr. Finansieringen har i hg grad medverkat till att strka befintliga mnster i verksamheter relaterade till ekonomisk utveckling snarare n att utgra en grund fr utveckling av nya verksamheter fr att uppfylla uppstllda ml eller att stimulera mer innovativa frfaringsstt.
It recognised the fact that: ÔThe emerging results inevitably flow to some extent from assumptions made within the modelling process.Ő The report noted that the scale of their impact, in different cases, reflected the relative importance and allocation of the CSF resources and factors such as initial factor endowments, economic structures, levels of competitiveness and the degree of Ôopen-nessŐ of the economy concerned. 
I rapporten r man medveten om att de resultat som uppkommit oundvikligen i viss grad hrrr frn antaganden som gjorts inom modellut-formningsprocessen. I rapporten ppekas att omfattningen av deras effekt, i olika fall, speglade omfattningen och tilldelningen av resurserna inom gemenskapsstdramen och faktorer ssom ursprungliga faktortillgngar, ekonomiska strukturer, konkurrenskraft och graden av ÓppenhetÓ i den ekonomi det gller.
It drew general conclusions concerning the impact of the structural funds relative to other external factors and indicated that, while job creation has been substantial, deadweight and displacement was also likely to be substantial. 
I rapporten drogs allmnna slutsatser om strukturfondernas effekt p andra externa faktorer och det ppekades att ven om det i betydande utstrckning har skapats sysselsttning s var ocks ddviktseffekterna och undantrngningseffekterna sannolikt betydande.
Its overall conclusion concerning these aspects was that: ÔManagement and implementation arrangements, though often characterised by weaknesses, were generally fit for the purpose, and significant benefits were achieved through the partnership approach. 
Den vergripande slutsatsen nr det gller dessa aspekter var att frvaltnings-och genomfrandearrangemangen visserligen ofta karakteriserades av brister men att de i allmnhet var vl lmpade fr syftet, och att partnerskapet medfrde stora frdelar.
However, important benefits in terms of wider Ňadded valueÓ were achieved through the programming approach and the development of public sector management capacity and practices.Ő The CourtŐs assessment of the quality of the evaluation Preliminary remarks 16. 
Man vann dock viktiga frdelar i form av ÓmervrdeÓ i vid mening genom programpla-neringsmetoden och utvecklingen av kapacitet och praxis inom offentlig frvaltning. Revisionsrttens bedmning av utvrderingens kvalitet Preliminra anmrkningar 16.
It is important to acknowledge that the broad approach adopted faced some intrinsic constraints, the principal ones being: time limitations, a limited range of quantified objectives and a lack of detailed result/impact indicators. 
Det r viktigt att komma ihg att det allmnna angreppsstt som valts hade vissa inneboende begrnsningar, av vilka de viktigaste var tidsbegrnsningar, begrnsat antal kvantifierade ml och brist p detaljerade indikatorer p resultat och effekt.
Furthermore, the impact that can be attributed directly to the programmes and related measures was often difficult to isolate since the target regions frequently benefitted from other operations that are instrumental in achieving similar objectives. 
Dessutom var den effekt som direkt kan tillskrivas programmen och de olika tgrderna ofta svr att isolera eftersom mlregionerna ofta mottog annat std som kraftigt bidrog till liknande resultat.
It was also difficult to identify and measure the indirect effects of the Structural Funds expenditure. 
Det var ocks svrt att identifiera och mta de indirekta effekterna av strukturfondsutgifter.
C 302/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 12.12.2006 However, the Court considers that certain weaknesses in the evaluation process cannot be attributed merely to inherent constraints but were due to deficiencies in the evaluation process which need to be addressed, particularly so before the ex post assessment of the 2000 to 2006 programming period. 
Revisionsrtten anserdock att vissa C 302/8 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 12.12.2006 brister i utvrderingsprocessen inte kan tillskrivas endast inneboende begrnsningar utan beror p brister i utvrderingsprocessen som behver tgrdas, i synnerhet fre efterhandsutvrderingen av programperioden 2000Đ2006.
Evolution of issues confronting the regions since 1994 17. 
Utveckling av problem som regionerna stllts infr sedan 1994 17.
The Synthesis Report starts with a brief analysis of developments in GDP per capita, unemployment and employment rates in the various regions concerned (1). 
Den sammanfattande rapporten inleds med en kort analys av utvecklingen av BNP per capita, arbetslshet och sysselsttningsgrad i de olika berrda regionerna (1).
The report concludes that: ÔIncreased levels of GDP per head have generally not been the result of increased employment rates resulting from job creationŐ (2). 
I rapporten dras slutsatsen att kade niver av BNP per capita i allmnhet inte har varit resultatet av kad sysselsttningsgrad till fljd av skapande av arbetstillfllen (2).
Such a conclusion would be a potentially important one for policy makers, suggesting that the main goal of cohesion policy of closing the GDP gap has not been significantly helped by improving labour participation rates (3), a conclusion of major relevance to the SFs. 
En sdan slutsats skulle vara potentiellt viktig fr beslutsfattare eftersom den antyder att frbttringen av arbetskraftstalet (3) inte i ngon vsentlig utstrckning har bidragit till det huvudsakliga mlet fr sammanhllningspolitiken som r att verbrygga BNP-gapet, en slutsats som har stor relevans fr strukturfonderna.
From the information presented in the Synthesis Report, it is difficult to judge the validity of the statement quoted above. 
Av den information som lades fram i den sammanfattande rapporten r det svrt att bedma giltigheten i det ovan nmnda uttalandet.
There are many regions where GDP per capita went up, as did the participation rates. 
I mnga regioner kade BNP per capita, liksom arbetskraftstalet.
However, there are some regions where either GDP per capita or the participation rate declined or increased only marginally. 
Det finns dock ngra regioner dr antingen BNP per capita eller arbetskraftstalet minskade eller kade endast marginellt.
The Court has sought to assess the claim quoted in paragraph 17 by applying statistical techniques to the data published in the Synthesis Report. 
Revisionsrtten har frskt bedma det pstende som nmns i punkt 17 ovan genom att tillmpa statistiska metoder p de uppgifter som presenterades i den sammanfattande rapporten.
The technical details of this analysis are given in Annex II and the essential points are briefly summarised hereunder. 
De tekniska detaljerna i denna analys redovisas i bilaga II och de viktigaste punkterna sammanfattas kortfattat nedan.
The results obtained indicate that changes in employment had a statistically significant impact on real GDP per capita. 
De uppndda resultaten indikerar att frndringar i sysselsttningen hade en statistiskt sett stor effekt p den reala BNP:n per capita.
In particular, a one percentage point increase in the employment rate was associated with a 0,24 percentage point increase in GDP per capita over the period under assessment. 
I synnerhet associerades en kning i sysselsttningsgrad p en procentenhet med en kning i BNP per capita p 0,24 procentenheter under bedmningsperioden.
This result is inconsistent with the conclusion of the Synthesis Report quoted above. 
Detta resultat strider mot slutsatsen i den sammanfattande rapporten som nmndes ovan.
It also suggests that there could indeed be some potential to close the GDP gap by improving labour participation rates Ń a relevant result from the policy perspective. 
Det antyder ocks att det verkligen skulle kunna vara mjligt att verbrygga BNP-gapet genom att frbttra arbetskraftstalet Đ ett resultat som r relevant ur ett politiskt perspektiv.
To explore further the robustness of the above result, the Court carried out an identical analysis of 145 regions for which data was consistently available (i.e. not just Objective 1 regions). 
Fr att vidare underska robustheten i det ovannmnda resultatet utfrde revisionsrtten en identisk analys i 145 regioner dr uppgifter fanns tillgngliga p ett konsekvent stt (dvs. inte bara ml 1-regioner).
The results, also reported in Annex II, show very similar results across the Union. 
Resultaten som ocks beskrivs i bilaga II visar mycket likartade resultat ver hela unionen.
These results show that information from basic (1) Synthesis Report, p. 
Dessa resultat visar att information (1) Sammanfattande rapport, s.
(2) Synthesis Report, p. 62. (3) Here referring to the active labour force as a percentage of the working age population. data was not sufficiently analysed and indicate an important relationship between increases in GDP and increases in the employment rate which the Synthesis Report did not highlight. 
(2) Sammanfattande rapport. s. 62. (3) Hr med betydelsen den aktiva arbetskraften som procentandel av frn grunduppgifter inte analyserades tillrckligt och visar p ett viktigt samband mellan kad BNP och kad sysselsttningsgrad vilket den sammanfattande rapporten inte lyfte fram.
Appropriateness of strategies adopted 21. 
De antagna strategiernas lmplighet 21.
The second chapter of the Synthesis Report examines the appropriateness of strategies adopted in terms of geographical and programme balance, as well as the balance between the funds. 
I det andra kapitlet i den sammanfattande rapporten undersks hur lmpliga de antagna strategierna r i frga om jmvikt mellan regioner, jmvikt mellan program och jmvikt mellan fonderna.
The planned and actual programme expenditures (4) of the Structural Funds are analysed by Member State and by type of fund but not by the relevant regions Ń in contrast to what is done in the report on GDP per capita and employment and unemployment rates in the various Objective 1 regions. 
Strukturfondernas planerade och faktiska programutgifter (4) analyseras per medlemsstat och per typ av fond men inte per relevant region Đ till skillnad frn vad som grs i rapporten nr det gller BNP per capita, sysselsttningsgrad och arbetslshetsgrad i de olika ml 1-regionerna.
This limits the analysis that can be performed, as is noted by the report itself in giving the results of a regression analysis which attempts to relate EU funds per capita by Member State to the GDP per head of population (5). 
Detta innebr att endast en begrnsad analys kan genomfras, vilket ocks ppekas i sjlva rapporten dr man ger resultaten av en regressionsanalys genom vilken man frsker relatera EU-medel per capita per medlemsstat till BNP per capita (5).
Accordingly, the results given in the report are not statistically significant and, consequently, are of limited value. 
Drfr r de resultat som ges i rapporten inte statistiskt signifikanta, och fljaktligen av begrnsat vrde.
However, the Court applied slightly different statistical techniques, using the same data as in the report. 
Revisionsrtten tillmpade dock ngot annorlunda statistiska metoder och anvnde samma uppgifter som i rapporten.
The technical details of this analysis are given in Annex III and the essential points are briefly summarised hereunder. 
De tekniska detaljerna i den analysen visas i bilaga III och de viktigaste punkterna sammanfattas kortfattat nedan.