natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN With regard to processing and marketing, the commission notes that in some cases it is difficult to draw a clear dividing line between what activities related to thinning/fell-ing and activities related to processing/marketing. for example, the purchase and use of wood-chipping equipment can help to provide organic matter for the soil and reduce the risk of fire and pests which would increase the value of the forest. if the equipment is suited for these purposes, it is considered eligible. 
Kommissionens svar När det gäller bearbetning och saluföring konstaterar kommissionen att det ibland är svårt att dra en klar skiljelinje mellan vilka aktiviteter som avser gallring eller avverkning och vilka aktiviteter som avser bearbetning eller saluföring. Exempelvis kan inköp och användning av utrustning för klyvning av virke bidra till att tillföra organiskt material till jorden och minska risken för brand och skadedjur, vilket ökar värdet i skogen. Om utrustningen är lämpad för dessa ändamål anses den berättiga till stöd.
However, the purchase of equipment for the purpose of producing wood chips for fuel should not be supported under measure 122. the commission has proposed to combine the current measures 122 and 123 after 2013. 
Kommissionen har föreslagit att de nuvarande åtgärderna 122 och 123 ska slås ihop efter 2013.
With regard to operating costs and consumables, the commission refers the court to its reply to paragraph 35. 
När det gäller driftskostnader och förbrukningsmaterial hänvisas revisionsrätten till svaret på punkt 35.
52. decisions about which specific categories of private owners to support belongs to the process of formulating/ negotiating a given rdp, on the basis of a sWot analysis related to the programme area in question. common reply to paragraphs 52 and 53. the combination of a number of measures from the current period into one measure — as proposed by the commission — provides a clearer overview. in particular, measures 122 and 123 from the current period will be combined into a single ‘sub-measure’ with one set of maximum aid intensities rather than two. 
52. Besluten om vilka särskilda kategorier av privata ägare som ska stödjas ingår i utformningen och förhandlingarna om ett visst landsbygdsutvecklingsprogram och grundas på en swot-analys av programområdet i fråga. gemensamt svar på punkterna 52 och 53.
49 nevertheless, it is not appropriate to set identical conditions for all of the forestry sub-measures: they are too different in terms of their content and the relevant categories of beneficiary. overall, the commission considers that, where problems exist, they can be addressed essentially through guidance, through the combination of the current measures 122 and 123 and through greater attention to certain issues during the programming process. conclusions and recoMMendations 54. although some aspects of the measure could have been explained more clearly to the management authorities, implementation could be improved and challenges needed to be overcome in monitoring and evaluation, implementation and results were stronger in some cases. 
49 Det är dock inte lämpligt att fastställa samma villkor för alla skogsbruksunderåtgärder: De är för olika till innehåll och i fråga om de berörda kategorierna av stödmottagare. Sammantaget anser kommissionen att om det finns problem kan dessa i huvudsak lösas genom vägledning, genom att slå samman de nuvarande åtgärderna 122 och 123 samt genom att ägna större uppmärksamhet åt vissa frågor under programplaneringen. slutsatser oCh rekommendationer 54.
Moreover, lessons have been learned which will be applied for the coming period — especially through guidance and within the programming process. 
Lärdomar har också dragits som kommer att utnyttjas för nästa period, särskilt genom vägledning och inom programplaneringen.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN 55. the commission considers that, where problems exist, they can be addressed primarily through guidance, through the combination of the current measures 122 and 123 and through greater attention to certain issues during the programming process. 
Kommissionens svar 55. Kommissionen anser att om det finns problem kan dessa huvudsakligen lösas genom vägledning, genom att slå samman de nuvarande åtgärderna 122 och 123 samt genom att ägna större uppmärksamhet åt vissa frågor under programplaneringen.
However, it will investigate with the council and the European parliament to what extent certain issues could be addressed in the relevant legal acts through a definition of ‘forest’ as well as a clearer explanation of the relationship between investments in equipment and improvements to the economic value of forests. 
Kommissionen kommer dock att tillsammans med rådet och Europaparlamentet undersöka i vilken mån vissa frågor kan lösas i de berörda rättsakterna genom en definition av ”skog” samt en tydligare förklaring av kopplingen mellan investeringar i utrustning och högre ekonomiskt värde i skog.
56. the commission analysed the situation of the forest sector in the 2005 commission staff Working document, which formed an annex to the communication on the implementation of the Eu forestry strategy (document reference sEc(2005) 333), which identified needs and strategic objectives. the commission is in the process of reviewing the 1998 Eu forestry strategy. the adoption of the ‘communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European Economic and social committee and the committee of the regions; together with our for-ests: a new Eu forest strategy’ is intended for 2013 and the communication and a staff Working document annexed to the communication will provide an Eu-level analysis of the Eu forestry sector. 
56. Kommissionen analyserade läget inom skogsbrukssektorn 2005 i ett arbetsdokument från kommissionens avdelningar, som utgjorde en bilaga till kommissionens meddelande Rapport om genomförandet av EU:s skogsbruksstrategi (SEK(2005) 333), där behov och strategiska mål identifieras.
50 57. in forest science and practice the concept of ‘economic value of forests’ is well recognised, and a set of operations leading to a likely increase in value in the long term is also well recognised. 
50 57. Inom skogsforskningen och skogsbruket är ”ekonomiskt värde i skog” ett vedertaget begrepp, och en uppsättning insatser som sannolikt kan leda till en värdehöjning på lång sikt är också välkända.
Ms can tailor this set of operations to their own circumstances. some indication as to the types of project that may be financed under the heading of improving the economic value of forests is suggested by the chapeau of article 20(b) of regulation 1698/2005 which refers to ‘restructuring and developing physical potential and promoting innovation’. the ‘potential’ economic value of a forest stand may depend on the possible use of a forest and its socioeconomic and technological environment. this argues against defining ‘economic value’ too narrowly. finally, the common Monitoring and Evaluation framework sets out a result indicator ‘increase in gross value added in supported holdings’. this contributes to a notion of what the measure should achieve. additional guidance on the term ‘forestry holding’ may be needed in future. the commission will also investigate with the council and the European parliament to what extent certain issues could be solved through a definition of ‘forest’ in the relevant legal acts. particular conditions concerning the size, main activity and legal status of beneficiaries are considered an issue to be addressed in individual rdps on the basis of a sWot analysis. 
Medlemsstaterna kan anpassa denna insatsuppsättning efter sina egna omständigheter. En viss vägledning om vilka slags projekt som kan finansieras under rubriken förbättring av det ekonomiska värdet i skog ges av inledningsfrasen i artikel 20 b i förordning (EG) nr 1698/2005 där det hänvisas till ”åtgärder för att omstrukturera och utveckla den fysiska potentialen samt främja innovation”.
58. the commission will pay the necessary attention to this issue in the negotiation of future rdps and will provide guidance as necessary. 
58. Kommissionen kommer att ägna nödvändig uppmärksamhet åt frågan om skogsbruksplaner i förhandlingen om framtida landsbygdsutvecklingsprogram och ge den vägledning som krävs. 59.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN recommendation 1 the commission accepts that it should continue to define and assess the need to improve the economic value of forests in the Eu, in such a way as to justify in general terms the inclusion of relevant support in rural development policy. it considers that studies already available indicate needs in general terms at Eu level. these studies include (among others): — ‘prospects for the market supply of wood and other forest products from areas with fragmented forest-ownership structures’; http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/supply‐ wood/index_en.htm — ‘Good practice guidance on the sustainable mobilisation of wood in Europe’; http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/fore/publi/forest_ brochure_en.pdf — ‘study of the Effects of Globalisation on the Economic Viability of Eu forestry’. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/ viability_forestry/index_en.htm the commission considers that more specific needs should continue to be assessed and defined at national and programme level by the competent national and regional authorities. the commission believes it should continue to define basic eligibility conditions at Eu level, but that more precise eligibility conditions and selection criteria should be set within individual rdps. it believes that its proposals for a rural development policy for after 2013 follow this approach. 
Kommissionens svar rekommendation 1 Kommissionen godtar att den ska fortsätta att definiera och utvärdera behovet av att höja det ekonomiska värdet i skog inom EU på ett sådant sätt att det i allmänna termer rättfärdigar att det berörda stödet tas med i landsbygdsutvecklingspolitiken.
However, additional guidance in this matter should be provided. the commission will also investigate with the council and the European parliament to what extent the desired relationship between investments in equipment and improvements to the economic value of forests could be clarified in the relevant legal acts. 
Kommissionen kommer också att tillsammans med rådet och Europaparlamentet undersöka i vilken utsträckning den önskade kopplingen mellan investeringar i utrustning och det höjda ekonomiska värdet i skog kan klargöras i de berörda rättsakterna.
Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development 
Särskild rapport nr 8/2013 – Stöd till åtgärden högre ekonomiskt värde i skog från europeiska jordbruksfonden för landsbygdsutveckling
51 recommendation 2 the commission notes that the principle of subsidiarity hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions in respect of the points raised — in line, for example, with the European parliament’s ‘report on the implementation of a European union forestry strategy’ (a6-0015/2006). 
51 rekommendation 2 I fråga om de punkter som revisionsrätten anför konstaterar kommissionen att subsidiaritetsprincipen ger medlemsstater och regioner betydande valfrihet. Detta överensstämmer med Europaparlamentets betänkande om genomförandet av en skogsbruksstrategi för Europeiska unionen (A6-0015/2006).
However, the commission agrees that adequate descriptions are needed. the level of detail required with regard to types of area and beneficiary may vary from one rdp territory to another. in the period 2014–20, rdps will be influenced by partnership agreements (pas) at Member state level, which will contain analyses of development needs for the Member state concerned in relation to the thematic objectives of the European structural and investment (Esi) funds. the commission has already provided an analytical position paper to each Member state to help guide the elaboration of the pas, and will provide further input through dialogue once the legislative framework is in place. 
Kommissionen håller dock med om att det behövs tillräckligt ingående beskrivningar. Hur detaljerade beskrivningar som behövs för en viss typ av område och stödmottagare kan variera från ett landsbygdsutvecklingsprograms territorium till ett annat. Under perioden 2014–2020 kommer landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen att påverkas av partnerskapsavtal på medlemsstatsnivå, som kommer att innehålla analyser av utvecklingsbehoven för den berörda medlemsstaten avseende de temarelaterade målen för de europeiska struktur- och investeringsfonderna.
With regard to ‘disproportionately high’ aid, it must be borne in mind that certain types of machinery are very expensive and provide a return on investment only in the long term — a fact accepted in the forest sector. this makes it difficult to set rigid rules about proportionality at Eu level. it should be decided in the programme negotiation process whether a limit on funding in proportion to holding size is appropriate, taking into account the characteristics of the programme area. 
Vad gäller ”oproportionerligt högt” stöd måste man komma ihåg att vissa typer av maskiner är mycket dyra och ger avkastning på investeringen först på lång sikt, vilket är ett välkänt faktum inom skogsbrukssektorn. Därför är det svårt att fastställa strikta regler om proportionalitet på EU-nivå.
With regard to felling, because of the primarily economic nature of the operations refered to by the court, state aid clearance in respect of measure 122 is sought not under the set of state aid guidelines cited by the court but rather under the Guidelines on national regional aid (2006/c 54/08), commission regulation 800/2008 (the so-called ‘Block exemption regulation’) or commission regulation 1998/2006 (the so-called ‘de minimis regulation’). 
När det gäller avverkning sker ansökan om godkännande av statligt stöd för åtgärd 122 på grund av den huvudsakligen ekonomiska karaktären av de insatser som revisionsrätten hänvisar till inte enligt de riktlinjer för statligt stöd som revisionsrätten nämner utan enligt riktlinjerna för nationellt regionalt stöd (2006/C 54/08), kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 800/2008 (allmän gruppundantagsförordning) eller kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 1998/2006 (förordning om stöd av mindre betydelse).
52 62. the commission considers that where measure 122 was the correct measure to use, the economic value of forests was indeed increased — even if the exact nature of the link between the aid and the increase of value of the forest varied according to the type of investment. the commission considers that the economic value of a forest is linked to its multifunctionality: it depends on various potential uses of the forest and not only on the single (though important) component that is wood. in the case of a forest which is used commercially for recreation on the basis of entrance fees, thinning and pruning may increase the potential economic value of the trees as a source of wood, but the main value of the forest stand may come from the accessibility of the land and the forest structure. recommendation 3 the commission notes that the principle of subsidiarity hands considerable discretion to Member states and regions in respect of the points raised — in line, for example, with the European parliament’s ‘report on the implementation of a European union forestry strategy’ (a6-0015/2006). the commission notes that precisely measuring increases in the economic value of a given forest may continue to present challenges in some cases. nevertheless, the possiblity of a certain level of measurement, combined with general expert knowledge about the benefits of certain types of investment for the value of a forest, constitute a valid basis for operating measure 122. for the next programming period, together with the Member states the commission is developing a cMEf which will allow the assessment, for each rdp, of progress in implementation against commonly defined target indicators for the priorities and focus areas selected for the programme. at the basis is an indicator plan which for each focus area sets the target and the planned outputs and expenditure for the measures that will be used to achieve the targets and objectives of the programme. the indicator plan represents more accurately the quantified intervention logic for each individual programme than does the current rigid axis structure. 
52 62. Kommissionen anser att när åtgärd 122 var korrekt åtgärd att använda ökade verkligen det ekonomiska värdet i skog, även om den exakta kopplingen mellan stödet och det ökade värdet i skogen varierade beroende på typen av investering.
Reply of the CoMMISSIoN common reply to paragraphs 63–64. the indicators and the evaluation questions of the current cMEf are related to the rationale and the objectives of measure 122 and the axis in which it is included. the commission considers that appropriate analysis of relevant data within the framework provided can illustrate the economic improvements generated through investments supported under this measure. it is recognised however, that Member states have experienced some difficulties in undertaking this economic analysis, and as a result the commission has 1. issued additional guidance in relation to the current period, and 2. reviewed the situation in order to improve the effectiveness of monitoring and evaluation for the future period. for the next programming period, together with the Member states the commission is developing a cMEf which will allow the assessment, for each rdp, of progress in implementation against commonly defined target indicators for the priorities and focus areas selected for the programme. at the basis is an indicator plan which for each focus area sets the target and the planned outputs and expenditure for the measures that will be used to achieve the targets and objectives of the programme. the indicator plan represents more accurately the quantified intervention logic for each individual programme than does the current rigid axis structure. it should be understood that qualitative assessment of measure 122 can play a valuable role alongside quantitative assessment, as it sometimes takes more time for policy intervention to lead to a clearly measurable effect in the case of forestry than in the case of farming. slovenia and austria established procedures intended to determine the effect of measure 122 on the economic value of forests. 
Kommissionens svar gemensamt svar på punkterna 63–64. Indikatorerna och utvärderingsfrågorna för den nuvarande övervaknings-och utvärderingsramen är relaterade till motiveringen och målen för åtgärd 122 och den axel där den ingår. Kommissionen anser att lämplig analys av berörda uppgifter inom den tillhandahållna ramen kan illustrera de ekonomiska förbättringar som är följden av investeringar som fått stöd inom denna åtgärd.
66. the commission considers that where measure 122 was the correct measure to use, the economic value of forests was indeed increased. 
66. Kommissionen anser att det ekonomiska värdet i skog faktiskt höjdes i de fall då åtgärd 122 var korrekt åtgärd att använda.
53 recommendation 4 the commission accepts that beneficiaries should be required to provide data. 
53 rekommendation 4 Kommissionen godtar att stödmottagarna bör åläggas att tillhandahålla uppgifter.
However, these data may be of a very basic nature and require significant processing to allow conclusions about increases in value. to compile result indicators such as ‘increase of GVa’, Ms have been invited14 to capture relevant information on GVa from the supported holdings when the application is approved and 2 years after the investment completion in order to integrate as much as possible the long-term effect of the investments. in practice, it has been difficult for Mas to compile the necessary data and conduct the analysis required to establish values for these types of result indicators as part of their regular monitoring activities. therefore, for the next programming period, this task the establishment of values for this indicator will rather be undertaken by the programme evaluators. the commission considers this a feasible and adequate approach. 
Dessa uppgifter kan dock vara av mycket elementär beskaffenhet. Det kan därför krävas betydande bearbetning om det ska vara möjligt att dra slutsatser om värdehöjningar. För att sammanställa resultatindikatorer såsom ökning av bruttoförädlingsvärdet (GVA) har medlemsstaterna upp-manats14 att samla in relevant information om GVA från de skogsbruksföretag som får stöd när ansökan har godkänts och två år efter det att investeringen slutförts för att så långt möjligt få med den långsiktiga effekten av investeringarna.
14 WorkingdocumentprovidingguidancetoMsfortheresultindicator ‘increase of GVa’: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload. cfm?id=84053593-c697-ff89-Ed5c-51797d9754fd Reply of the CoMMISSIoN Special report No 8/2013 – Support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the European agricultural fund for rural development 
Kommissionen anser att detta är en genomförbar och lämplig uppläggning. 14 Arbetsdokument som ger medlemsstaterna vägledning om resultatindikatorn ökning av bruttoförädlingsvärdet: http://enrd. ec.europa.eu/app_templates/filedownload.cfm?id=84053593-C697-FF89-ED5C-51797D9754FD.
European Court of auditors special report no 8/2013 support for the improvement of the economic value of forests from the european agricultural fund for rural development luxembourg: publications office of the European union 2013 — 53 pp. — 21 × 29.7 cm ISBN 978-92-9241-248-7 doi:10.2865/83666 
europeiska revisionsrätten särskild rapport nr 8/2013 stöd till åtgärden högre ekonomiskt värde i skog från europeiska jordbruksfonden för landsbygdsutveckling luxemburg: europeiska unionens publikationsbyrå 2013 —53 s. — 21 × 29,7 cm iSbn 978‐92‐9241‐264‐7 doi:10.2865/87340
Free publications: HOw TO ObTAIn EU pUbLICATIOnS • one copy: via Eu Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • more than one copy or posters/maps: from the European union’s representations (http://ec.europa.eu/represent_en.htm); from the delegations in non-Eu countries (http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/index_en.htm); by contacting the Europe direct service (http://europa.eu/europedirect/index_en.htm) or calling 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (freephone number from anywhere in the Eu) (*). (*) the information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). priced publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). priced subscriptions: • via one of the sales agents of the Publications Office of the European Union (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm). 
gratispublikationer hur hittar man eu:s publikatiOner? • Ett enskilt exemplar genom eu bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). • Flera exemplar/affischer/kartor hos europeiska unionens representationer (http://ec.europa.eu/represent_sv.htm), hos delegationer i länder utanför eu (http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/index_sv.htm), genom att kontakta nätverket europe direct (http://europa.eu/europedirect/index_sv.htm) eller ringa 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (gratis inom hela eu) (*). (*) varken informationen eller samtalen kostar i regel något (men vissa operatörer, telefonkiosker och hotell kan ta betalt för samtalen). avgiftsbelagda publikationer • Genom EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). avgiftsbelagda prenumerationer • Genom ett av Europeiska unionens publikationsbyrås försäljningsombud (http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_sv.htm).
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS EN EU SUPPORT FOR GOVERNANCE IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO Special Report No 9 2013 ISSN 1831-0834 
EUROPEISKA REVISIONSRÄTTEN SV EU:s STÖD TILL EN GOD SAMHÄLLSSTYRNING I DEMOKRATISKA REPUBLIKEN KONGO Särskild rapport nr 9 2013 ISSN 1831-0990
Special Report No 9 2013 EU SUPPORT FOR GOVERNANCE IN THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
Särskild rapport nr 9 2013 EU:s STÖD TILL EN GOD SAMHÄLLSSTYRNING I DEMOKRATISKA REPUBLIKEN KONGO (i enlighet med artikel 287.4 andra stycket i EUF-fördraget) EUROPEISKA REVISIONSRÄTTEN