natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The CourtŐs report highlights on a number of occasions that the incidence of BSE in Member States was likely to be under-reported and that the ÔBSE-freeŐ status of some Member States was questionable. 
Revisionsrttens rapport visar vid ett antal tillfllen att den rapporterade frekomsten av BSE i medlemsstaterna sannolikt var lgre n den verkliga, och att vissa medlemsstaters Ófrihet frn BSEÓ kunde ifrgasttas.
It is important to highlight that the Commission in its policy decisions always acted on the basis that both of these assumptions were correct. This is evidenced in the approach 
Det r viktigt att framhlla att kommissionen i sina strategiska beslut alltid agerade utifrn frutsttningen att bda dessa antaganden var korrekta. Detta visas i sttet
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/33 towards SRMs where the Commission insisted on a harmonised EU measure requiring their removal and destruction in all Member States with BSE. 
20.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 324/33 att behandla specificerat riskmaterial, dr kommissionen yrkade p att detta genom en harmoniserad tgrd frn EU:s sida skulle avlgsnas och destrueras i alla medlemsstater med BSE.
In order to establish accurately the true incidence of BSE and its geographical spread, the Commission proposed strengthened surveillance measures, including the use of rapid tests. 
Fr att p ett korrekt stt faststlla den verkliga frekomsten av BSE och dess geografiska spridning freslog kommissionen frstrkta vervak-ningstgrder, bl.a. anvndning av snabbtest.
The Commission also asked the SSC for its assessment on the geographical risk of BSE and provided extensive background information in this respect. 
Kommissionen bad ocks Vetenskapliga styrkommittn bedma den geografiska risken fr BSE och lmnade omfattande bakgrundsinformation.
The opinions of the SSC, which the Commission fully supported, concluded that BSE was likely to exist in a number of Member States which considered themselves to be BSE-free. 
I Vetenskapliga styrkommittns yttranden, som kommissionen helt stdde, drogs slutsatsen att BSE sannolikt fanns i ett antal medlemsstater som betraktade sig som BSE-fria.
Unfortunately, several Member States disputed this opinion until confronted with confirmation of the presence of BSE. 
Olyckligtvis ifrgasatte flera medlemsstater denna uppfattning tills BSE-frekomsten bekrftats.
In the absence of reliable rapid tests, which only became available in late 1999, it is inevitable that a certain number of BSE cases, in the late stages of clinical infectiveness, escape detection. 
I brist p tillfrlitliga snabbtest, som fanns tillgngliga frst i slutet av 1999, r det oundvikligt att ett antal BSE-fall p sent stadium av klinisk infektionsfrmga undgr upptckt.
The incidence of BSE should also be looked at in perspective. 
BSE-frekomsten br ocks ses i rtt perspektiv.
Notwithstanding the increased surveillance measures in place, including the testing of all bovines aged over 30 months, the number of cases falls dramatically short of the incidence in the UK. 
Trots den frstrkta vervakning som infrts, bl.a. testning av alla ntkreatur ver 30 mnaders lder, sjunker antalet fall dramatiskt med undantag fr frekomsten i Frenade kungariket.
At the peak of the epidemic in the UK, in 1992, the annual incidence was of the order of 37 000 in a herd population of less than 11 million. 
Nr epidemin kulminerade i Frenade kungariket var den rliga frekomsten 1992 av storleksordningen 37 000 fall i en kreatursstam p knappt 11 miljoner djur.
This compares to the expected incidence of less than 1 000 elsewhere in the EU in 2000 in a herd population of over 70 million. 
Detta skall jmfras med den frvntade frekomsten av mindre n 1 000 fall p andra hll i EU r 2000 i en kreatursstam p drygt 70 miljoner djur.
The Commission view is that the fall in consumer confidence in the course of the most recent crisis is attributable to a combination of factors but especially the discovery of BSE for the first time in a number of Member States and the higher than expected incidence in a number of others. 
Kommissionen anser att konsumenternas minskande frtroende under den senaste krisen kan tillskrivas en kombination av faktorer, men srskilt upptckten av BSE fr frsta gngen i ett antal medlemsstater och att frekomsten var strre n vntat i flera andra.
These discoveries were contrary to public expectations in the countries concerned where consumers had been led to believe that BSE was not a national problem. 
Dessa upptckter stred i de berrda lnderna mot allmnhetens frvntningar dr konsumenterna hade frletts till att tro att BSE inte var ngot nationellt problem.
Consumers reacted adversely to these discoveries. 
Konsumenterna reagerade negativt p dessa upptckter.
There has been a comprehensive body of legislation in place to combat BSE for several years. 
Under flera r har det funnits en omfattande lagstiftning fr att bekmpa BSE.
The scientific evidence strongly supports the view that this legislation, if rigorously implemented, is sufficient to protect against the risks of transmission of BSE. 
Vetenskapliga bevis ger starkt std t uppfattningen att denna lagstiftning, om den tillmpas strikt, r tillrcklig fr att skydda mot riskerna fr spridning av BSE.
The Commission has repeatedly reminded Member States of their obligations in this respect and has given a high priority to inspections in the Member States of the implementation of control measures. 
Kommissionen har upprepade gnger pmint medlemsstaterna om deras skyldigheter i detta avseende och har gett hg prioritet t inspektioner i medlemsstaterna av hur kontrolltgrderna genomfrs.
These inspections have confirmed that the degree of implementation often left much to be desired. 
Dessa inspektioner har bekrftat att genomfrandegraden ofta lmnar mycket vrigt att nska.
The reports of these inspections are published on the Internet and discussed with the Member States with a view to encouraging better compliance. 
Rapporterna frn inspektionerna publiceras p Internet och diskuteras med medlemsstaterna fr att stimulera till en bttre efterlevnad.
Moreover, the Commission initiated legal infringements against most of the Member States in the period 1997 to 1999. 
Drutver inledde kommissionen tgrder mot vertrdelser i flertalet medlemsstater under perioden 1997Đ1999.
The lengthy delay in processing infringement proceedings has been highlighted by the Court as an obstacle to the CommissionŐs ability to ensure better implementation. 
Revisionsrtten har framhllit den betydande frseningen i handlggningen av vertrdelsefrfaranden som ett hinder fr kommissionens mjligheter att frbttra genomfrandet.
The Commission acknowledges this failing, but there are few alternatives. 
Kommissionen erknner denna brist, men det finns f alternativ.
Member States insist on a full and lengthy process to allow their point of view to be taken fully into account in any potential legal infringements and there is also a very high burden of proof on the Commission. 
Medlemsstaterna krver ett fullstndigt och lngdraget frfarande fr att deras synpunkter skall kunna beaktas fullt ut vid alla potentiella lagvertrdelser, och bevisbrdan p kommissionen r mycket stor.
In addition, the resources available to the Commission for inspections are also limited, as is acknowledged by the Court. 
Dessutom har kommissionen begrnsade resurser fr inspektioner, vilket revisionsrtten bekrftar.
The Commission is actively reflecting on what more could be done to improve compliance and the CourtŐs report is very welcome in this respect. 
Kommissionen vervger aktivt vad som kan gras ytterligare fr att frbttra efterlevnaden, och revisionsrttens rapport r mycket vlkommen i detta avseende.
The reflections of the Court on reorienting subsidies and encouraging extensification constitute the major part of the decision proposed by the Commission and adopted by the Agriculture Council of 20 June 2001. 
Revisionsrttens vervganden om omstllningsstd och frmjande av extensifiering utgr huvuddelen av det beslut som freslogs av kommissionen och antogs av rdet (jordbruk) den 20 juni 2001.
The decisions taken (covering the period 2001 to 2003) include, for both premium schemes, a progressive reduction of the stocking density from 2 LU/ha to 1,8 LU/ha, for the special beef premium a substantial reduction of the national ceilings and, with regard to the suckler cow scheme, the introduction of a compulsory minimum number of heifers to be kept under this scheme and a suspension of reallocating premiumsŐ rights from the national reserves. 
I de beslut som fattats (fr ren 2001Đ2003) ingr i bda bidragsordningarna en progressiv minskning av djurttheten frn 2 ntenheter (ne)/ha till 1,8 ne/ha, fr det srskilda bidraget till ntktt en vsentlig snkning av de nationella taken, och nr det gller am-och dikoprogrammet, infrande av ett obligatoriskt minimiantal kvigor som skall hllas inom programmet och upphrande med verfringar av bidragsrtter frn de nationella reserverna.
The Commission considers the report in general a fair objective analysis of the BSE measures introduced and implemented since 1998. 
Kommissionen anser att rapporten i allmnhet r en riktig och objektiv analys av de tgrder som infrts och tillmpats mot BSE sedan 1998.
The Commission services endorse in general the reportŐs conclusions and recommendations notably that the Commissions strategy is basically sound, but that the implementation is problematic (point 47). 
Kommissionens avdelningar delar i allmnhet rapportens slutsatser och rekommendationer, srskilt att kommissionens strategi i huvudsak r bra, men att genomfrandet r problematiskt (punkt 47).
THE COMMISSIONŐS BSE STRATEGY 14. 
KOMMISSIONENS STRATEGI BETRFFANDE BSE 14.
As the Court points out correctly the knock-on effect of the BSE cases detected in several Member States resulted in a never-before-experienced drop in consumption in the Community. 
Som revisionsrtten mycket riktigt framhller ledde den ked-jereaktion av BSE-fall som upptcktes i flera medlemsstater till att konsumtionen i gemenskapen minskade.
Numerous importing countries imposed bans on EU imports of live cattle and bovine products. 
Mnga importlnder frbjud import av levande ntboskap och produkter frn ntboskap.
The situation worsened dramatically in February 2001 as the sector was hit by foot-and-mouth disease. 
Lget frvrrades dramatiskt i februari 2001 d sektorn drabbades av mul-och klvsjuka.
C 324/34 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 The major objective of the purchase-for-destruction scheme was to contribute immediately to a restoration of the consumerŐs confidence in beef, by bringing into force the compulsory BSE testing on cattle slaughtered during the intermediate period before the entry into force of Decision 2000/764/EC, as well as to take pressure away, as much as possible, from the market, due to the very significant imbalance between the cattle kept on farm and the demand for meat. 
C 324/34 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 20.11.2001 Huvudmlet fr uppkpsordningen fr destruering var att omedelbart medverka till att terstlla konsumenternas frtroende fr ntktt genom att genomdriva obligatorisk BSE-testning av ntkreatur som slaktades under mellanperioden innan beslut 2000/ 764/EG trdde i kraft, och att s lngt mjligt avlasta marknaden frn det tryck som orsakades av den stora obalansen mellan djur som hlls p fretagen och efterfrgan p ktt.
The result of this policy, combined with an active purchase into intervention of beef, yielded significant positive results to such an extent that by the end of May 2001 the market loss could already be assessed as some 10 %. 
Resultatet av denna politik i kombination med aktiva interventionskp av ntktt gav tydliga positiva resultat i sdan grad att marknadsbortfallet redan i slutet av maj 2001 kunde uppskattas till cirka 10 %.
It is true to say that the financial cost of this scheme is lower than the purchase of beef into intervention. 
Det r sant att den finansiella kostnaden fr detta program r lgre n fr interventionskp av ntktt.
It is however also important to underline that intervention is limited to beef originating from male animals and, therefore, for beef originating from female animals there is no optional approach possible. 
Det r emellertid ocks viktigt att understryka att interventionen r begrnsad till ktt frn handjur, och drfr finns det inget alternativ fr hondjur.
The number of male and female animals that effectively entered the purchase-for-destruction scheme ending in June 2001 is 769 632 (situation as at 30 June 2001). 
Antalet han-och hondjur som faktiskt ingick i den uppkpsordning fr destruering som avslutades i juni 2001 r 769 632 (lget den 30 juni 2001).
It is worthwhile to remember that premiums aim to compensate farmers partially for price reductions decided in the context of the market support mechanisms. 
Det r vrt att pminna om att bidragen syftar till att delvis kompensera jordbrukarna fr de prissnkningar som beslutas enligt marknadsstdsmekanismerna.
In addition, the reflections of the Court on reorienting subsidies and encouraging extensification constitute the major part of the decision proposed by the Commission and adopted by the Agriculture Council of 20 June 2001. 
Revisionsrttens vervganden om omstllningsstd och frmjande av extensifiering utgr dessutom huvuddelen av det beslut som freslogs av kommissionen och antogs av rdet (jordbruk) den 20 juni 2001.
The decisions taken (covering the period 2001 to 2003) include, for both premium schemes, a progressive reduction of the stocking density from 2 LU/ha to 1,8 LU/ha, for the special beef premium a substantial reduction of the national ceilings and, with regard to the suckler cow scheme, the introduction of a compulsory minimum number of heifers to be kept under this scheme and a suspension of reallocating premiumsŐ rights from the national reserves. 
I de beslut som fattats (fr ren 2001Đ2003) ingr i bda bidragsordningarna en progressiv minskning av djurttheten frn 2 ne/ha till 1,8 ne/ha, fr det srskilda bidraget till ntktt en vsentlig snkning av de nationella taken, och nr det gller am-och dikoprogrammet, infrande av ett obligatoriskt minimiantal kvigor som skall hllas inom programmet och upphrande med verfringar av bidragsrtter frn de nationella reserverna.
All EU rendering plants are now equipped to operate appropriate processing standards (133 Ą, 3 bars, 20 minutes). 
Alla konverteringsanlggningar i EU r nu utrustade fr att tillmpa betryggande bearbetningsnormer (133 Ą, 3 bar, 20 minuter).
The Scientific Steering Committee has not pointed at a general danger in using animal-based protein in animal feed in the context of BSE: provided certain conditions are fulfilled, the Scientific Steering Committee has not advised against using animal protein in feed for non-ruminant species. 
Vetenskapliga styrkommittn har inte antytt ngon allmn fara med att anvnda animaliebaserat protein i foder i samband med BSE. Frutsatt att vissa villkor uppfylls har Vetenskapliga styrkommittn inte avrtt frn anvndning av animaliskt protein i foder fr icke-idisslare.
Likewise, certain animal-based proteins, such as fish meal or milk-based protein, are not considered to present a BSE risk in feed for any species, including ruminants. 
Likas anses vissa animaliebaserade proteiner, t.ex. fiskmjl eller mjlkbaserat protein, inte medfra ngon BSE-risk i foder fr ngon art, inklusive idisslare.
The current total ban on feeding animal protein to farm animals was adopted as a control measure in the absence of a test capable of differentiating between protein of different species and pending the adoption and enforcement of the draft regulation on animal by-producs. 
Det nuvarande totalfrbudet mot utfodring av husdjur med animaliskt protein antogs som en bekmpningstgrd i avsaknad av ett test som kunde skilja mellan protein frn olika arter och i avvaktan p antagandet och genomfrandet av frslaget till frordning om animaliska biprodukter.
After the International Scientific Conference on MBM, the Commission decided to seek a scientific opinion on the safety of MBM. 
Efter den internationella vetenskapliga konferensen om ktt-och benmjl beslutade kommissionen begra ett vetenskapligt yttrande om skerheten i ktt-och benmjl.
This opinion was delivered in June 1999 and re-edited in July 1999. 
Yttrandet lmnades i juni 1999 och omarbetades i juli 1999.
The recommendations of that opinion have been included in the proposed regulation on animal by-products and Commission Decision 2001/25/EC. 
Rekommendationerna i detta yttrande har tagits med i frslaget till frordning om animaliska biprodukter och kommissionens beslut 2001/25/EG.
It should be noted that the mentioned replacement of the existing 1992 Directive on animal identification and registration with a new Council regulation only concerns the provisions for bovine animals. 
Det br noteras att nmnda ersttning av det befintliga direktivet frn 1992 om identifiering och registrering av djur med en ny frordning frn rdet endast berr bestmmelserna fr ntkreatur.
Furthermore, the Commission is considering a proposal for a regulation with the aim of reinforcement of the existing provisions for identification and registration of sheep. 
Dessutom vervger kommissionen ett frslag till frordning som syftar till att frstrka nuvarande bestmmelser fr identifiering och registrering av fr.
Council legislation does not allow Ôcross complianceŐ as is the case for hormone legislation, for example. 
Rdets lagstiftning medger inte Ómsesidig verensstm-melseÓ, till skillnad frn t.ex. hormonlagstiftningen.
RECOMMENDATIONS 55. (a) The Commission considers that these proposals merit consideration (see general overview). 
REKOMMENDATIONER 55. a) Kommissionen anser att dessa frslag r vrda att vervgas (se den allmnna versikten).
The question of whether the Commission should have specific additional emergency powers is a very delicate issue as Member States are reluctant to cede such powers without the safeguard of clearance though a regulatory committee. 
Frgan om huruvida kommissionen br ha srskilda ytterligare undantagsbefogenheter r mycket mtlig, d medlemsstaterna endast motvilligt avstr frn sdana befogenheter utan skerhet i form av godknnande frn en freskrivande kommitt.
The situation will improve with the introduction of implementing powers conferred on the Commission and a number of sectoral pieces of legislation also increase the powers of the Commission in relation to emergency decisions. 
Situationen kommer att frbttras nr kommissionen fr genomfrandebefogenhe-ter, och srlagstiftningen inom ett antal sektorer strker ocks kommissionens befogenheter att fatta beslut i ndsituationer.
In the interim, there is a heightened political awareness of the need to take no short cuts in relation to public health protection. 
Under tiden finns en frhjd politisk medvetenhet om behovet av att inte g ngra genvgar nr det gller skyddet av folkhlsan.
The Commission is actively reflecting on what more could be done to improve compliance and the CourtŐs report is very welcome in this respect. (b) The link made by the Court to the possibility of withholding financial support is likely to be controversial with the Member States. 
Kommissionen vervger aktivt ytterligare tgrder fr att frbttra efterlevnaden, och revisionsrttens rapport r mycket vlkommen i detta avseende. b) Den knytning revisionsrtten gr till mjligheten att innehlla finansiellt std kommer sannolikt att bli kontroversiell hos medlemsstaterna.
Such action would only be a last resort in the context of persistent poor application of Community legislation or failure to implement scientifically justified safeguard measures as envisaged in the report. 
En sdan tgrd skulle endast vara en sista utvg vid en konstant bristfllig tillmpning av gemenskapens lagstiftning eller underltenhet att genomfra vetenskapligt motiverade skyddstgrder ssom anges i rapporten.
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/35 (d) and (e) The reflections of the Court on reorienting subsidies and encouraging extensification constitute the major part of the Decision proposed by the Commission and adopted by the Agriculture Council of 20 June 2001. 
20.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 324/35 d) och e) Revisionsrttens vervganden om omstllningsstd och frmjande av extensifiering utgr huvuddelen av det beslut som freslagits av kommissionen och antogs av rdet (jordbruk) den 20 juni 2001.
The decisions taken (covering the period 2001 to 2003) include, for both premium schemes, a progressive reduction of the stocking density from 2 LU/ha to 1,8 LU/ha, for the special beef premium a substantial reduction of the national ceilings and, with regard to the suckler cow scheme, the introduction of a compulsory minimum number of heifers to be kept under this scheme and a suspension of reallocating premiumsŐ rights from the national reserves. 
I de beslut som fattats (fr ren 2001Đ2003) ingr i bda bidragsordningarna en progressiv minskning av djurttheten frn 2 ne/ha till 1,8 ne/ha, fr det srskilda bidraget till ntktt en vsentlig snkning av de nationella taken och, nr det gller am-och dikoprogrammet, infrande av ett obligatoriskt minimiantal kvigor som skall hllas inom programmet och upphrande med verfringar av bidragsrtter frn de nationella reserverna.
23.5.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 121/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 1/2002 concerningmacrofinancialassistance(MFA)tothirdcountriesandstructuraladjustmentfacilities (SAF)intheMediterraneancountries,togetherwiththeCommissionŐsreplies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC) (2002/C 121/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................. 
23.5.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 121/1 I (Meddelanden) REVISIONSRTTEN SRSKILD RAPPORT nr 1/2002 om makroekonomiskt std till tredje land och strukturanpassningsstd till Medelhavslnderna samt kommissionens svar (i enlighet med artikel 248.4 andra stycket i EG-frdraget) (2002/C 121/01) INNEHLLSF RTECKNING SAMMANFATTNING .........................................................
MFAtothirdcountries ..................................................... THECOURTŐSAUDIT......................................................... 
Programversikt........................................................... Ramarochrttsliggrund....................................................
DESIGNOFPROGRAMMES.................................................... SAF in the Mediterranean countries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Utformningavstrukturanpassningsstd ........................................ Utformningavmakroekonomisktstd ......................................... Bedmning av partnerregeringarnas budget-och redovisningsfrfaranden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vervakning .............................................................
Background ........................................................... 
Bakgrund .............................................................
MFAtothirdcountries ..................................................... 
Villkoratstd ..........................................................
Complementarity ....................................................... Paragraph Page I-VIII 3 I 3 II 3 III 3 IV 3 V 4 VI 4 VII 4 VIII 4 1-7 5 8-10 6 8 6 9-10 6 11-14 6 15-46 6 15-27 6 15-16 6 17-19 7 20-21 7 22-27 7 28-46 8 28-29 8 30-33 9 34-35 9 36-41 9 
Ndvndigapolitiskafrutsttningar ........................................ Komplement till annan finansiering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Punkt Sida IĐVIII 3 I 3 II 3 III 3 IV 3 V 4 VI 4 VII 4 VIII 4 1Đ7 5 8Đ10 6 8 6 9Đ10 6 11Đ14 6 15Đ46 6 15Đ27 6 15Đ16 6 17Đ19 7 20Đ21 7 22Đ27 7 28Đ46 8 28Đ29 8 30Đ33 9 34Đ35 9 36Đ41 9