natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Located on the frontline, Greece and Italy are disproportionately burdened. 
Grekland och Italien, som befinner sig i frontlinjen, br en oproportionerlig andel av brdan.
03 With a view to addressing the crisis, the EU has devised several measures to supplement the funding provided to Member States under its migration management policy. These include the setting-up of ŇhotspotsÓ and introduction of temporary relocation schemes. 
03 I syfte att hantera krisen har EU utarbetat flera tgrder som kompletterar finansieringen till medlemsstaterna inom ramen fr EU:s migrationshanteringspolitik. tgrderna inbegriper upprttandet av hotspots och infrandet av tillflliga omplaceringsmekanismer.
Furthermore, it has issued legislative proposals to overhaul the Common European Asylum System. 
Vidare har EU utfrdat lagfrslag om att se ver det gemensamma europeiska asylsystemet.
At the heart of this reform lies the revision of the Dublin III mechanism which obliges asylum seekers to file an application in their country of first entry into the Union. 
Krnan i denna reform utgrs av versynen av Dublin III-systemet som lgger asylskande att lmna in en anskan i det frsta inreselandet i EU.
Its proposed revision Đ the Dublin IV Regulation Đ includes a permanent relocation system to replace the temporary quota-based distribution schemes that expired in September 2017. 
I den freslagna nya versionen Đ Dublin IV-frordningen Đ fresls att ett permanent omplaceringssystem ska erstta de tillflliga kvotbaserade frdelningssystem som lpte ut i september 2017.
04 The hotspot approach sees EU agencies (mainly EASO, Frontex and the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation) assisting frontline Member States on the ground with identifying, registering, fingerprinting and debriefing of new arrivals, in order to ascertain those requiring international protection. 
04 Inom ramen fr hotspot-systemet bistr EU-byrer (huvudsakligen Easo, Frontex och Europeiska unionens byr fr samarbete inom brottsbekmpning) medlemsstater i frontlinjen med att p plats identifiera, registrera, ta fingeravtryck p nyanlnda och frga ut dem i syfte att faststlla vilka som behver internationellt skydd.
Between 2015 and 2018, there were five hotspots in each of Greece and Italy (Figure 1). 
Mellan 2015 och 2018 fanns det fem hotspots i Grekland och fem i Italien (figur 1).
Due to low numbers of arrivals, the hotspot in Trapani was reconverted to a detention centre in October 2018. 6 
P grund av det lga antalet nyanlnda omvandlades mottagningscentrumet i Trapani i oktober 2018 till en frvarsenhet. 6
Figure 1 Đ Hotspots in Greece and Italy Š European Agency for Fundamental Rights. 
Figur 1 Đ Hotspots i Grekland och Italien 7 Š Europeiska unionens byr fr grundlggande rttigheter.
05 Greece and Italy apply the hotspot approach differently. 
05 Grekland och Italien tillmpar hotspot-systemet p olika stt.
When registering and identifying irregular migrants, both record whether a new arrival intends to request international protection. 
Vid registrering och identifiering av irreguljra migranter registrerar bda huruvida en nyanlnd har fr avsikt att anska om internationellt skydd.
In Italy, those who do are transferred by bus or boat to reception facilities across Italy. 
I Italien flyttas de som lmnar in en sdan anskan med buss eller bt till mottagningsanlggningar i hela Italien.
By contrast, following the EU-Turkey statement of 18 March 2016, migrants on the Greek islands (except for vulnerable people, family reunification cases and admissible Syrians) are obliged to remain on the hotspot island (under the so-called Ňgeographical restrictionÓ) throughout the entire asylum procedure, including any appeals (Figure 2). 7 
Dremot mste migranter p de grekiska arna (med undantag av srbara personer, fall som rr familjeterfrening och syrier vars anskan r tilltlig) efter uttalandet frn EU och Turkiet den 18 mars 2016, stanna kvar p den  dr mottagningscentrumet ligger (i enlighet med den s.k. geografiska restriktionen) under hela asylfrfarandet, ven eventuella verklaganden (figur 2).
06 The temporary relocation schemes were introduced by two Council decisions in September 20151. 
06 De tillflliga omplaceringsmekanismerna infrdes genom tv rdsbeslut i september 20151.
In operation between 24 March 2015 and 26 September 2017, the schemes aimed to relocate 160 000 migrants, based on quotas, in order to share the burden among Member States, thereby relieving the pressure on the countries of first entry. 
Mekanismerna, som anvndes mellan den 24 mars 2015 och den 26 september 2017, syftade till att omplacera 160 000 migranter, baserat p kvoter, i syfte att frdela brdan mellan medlemsstaterna och drigenom minska trycket p de frsta inreselnderna.
07 An effective return policy is a necessary part of a comprehensive and legitimate migration policy. 
9 07 En effektiv tervndandepolitik r en ndvndig del av en omfattande och legitim migrationspolitik.
At the end of 2010, the EU Return Directive entered into force, setting common rules for the return of migrants staying irregularly. 
I slutet av 2010 trdde EU:s tervndandedirektiv i kraft i vilket gemensamma regler faststlls fr tervndande av migranter som vistas olagligt i medlemsstaterna.
The Commission proposed a revision of this directive in September 20182. 
Kommissionen freslog i september 20182 att direktivet skulle ses ver.
08 The Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) provides the majority of EU funds for migration management. 
08 Asyl-, migrations-och integrationsfonden (Amif) tillhandahller merparten av EU:s medel fr migrationshantering.
AMIF was set up for the 2014-2020 period to promote the efficient management of migration flows, and to implement and strengthen the EUŐs common asylum and immigration policy. 
Amif inrttades fr perioden 2014Đ2020 i syfte att frmja effektiv hantering av migrationsstrmmar samt genomfra och strka EU:s gemensamma asyl-och immigrationspolitik.
09 Most AMIF funding is channelled through shared management to support the Member StatesŐ multiannual national programmes. 
09 Strre delen av Amifs finansiering kanaliseras genom delad frvaltning som std fr medlemsstaternas flerriga nationella program.
These programmes are co-financed by the Member States, who see to their preparation, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. 
Programmen medfinansieras av medlemsstaterna, som ser till att de utarbetas, genomfrs, vervakas och utvrderas.
Managed either directly by the Commission or indirectly by international organisations, this is financed almost entirely by the EU budget. 
Det frvaltas antingen direkt av kommissionen eller indirekt av internationella organisationer och finansieras nstan helt frn EU:s budget.
10 EASO assists the Greek and Italian authorities on the basis of yearly operating plans. 
10 Easo bistr de grekiska och italienska myndigheterna p grundval av rliga verksamhetsplaner.
In 2018, in Greece, EASO helped register and process asylum applications at the border, and provided support to the regular asylum procedure, the appeal authorities and the Dublin Unit. 
I Grekland hjlpte Easo 2018 till med att registrera och handlgga asylanskningar vid grnsen samt tillhandahll std till det reguljra asylfrfarandet, verklagandemyndigheterna och Dublinenheten.
In Italy, EASO informed migrants in hotspots about asylum, helped register asylum applications, and supported the national and territorial asylum commissions and the Dublin Unit. 
I Italien gav Easo information om asyl till migranter som befann sig i hotspots, hjlpte till med att registrera asylanskningar, samt bistod de nationella och territoriella asylkommissionerna och Dublinenheten.
11 In addition, EASO has been involved in strengthening the capacity of national asylum authorities, improving the reception system and protecting vulnerable groups, including unaccompanied minors. 
11 Dessutom har Easo bidragit till att strka kapaciteten vid nationella asylmyndigheter, frbttra deras mottagningssystem och skydda utsatta grupper, dribland ensamkommande barn.
12 When requested by Member States, Frontex coordinates the return of irregular migrants ineligible for international protection on their territory. 
12 Frontex samordnar p medlemsstaternas begran tervndandet av irreguljra migranter som inte har rtt till internationellt skydd till deras territorium.
Its European Centre for Returns provides operational and technical support to the Member States and Schengen Associated Countries during pre-return and return operations. 
Dess europeiska centrum fr tervndande tillhandahller operativt och tekniskt std till medlemsstaterna och Schengenassocierade lnder vid insatser fre tervndande samt vid tervndandeinsatser.
13 From 2006 to 2016, Frontex coordinated joint operations on charter flights. In 2016, its mandate was extended to the organisation/coordination of national return operations. 
13 Mellan 2006 och 2016 samordnade Frontex gemensamma insatser med chartrade flygplan. r 2016 utvidgades dess mandat till att omfatta organisering/samordning av nationella tervndandeinsatser.
In December 2017, it also began supporting returns on scheduled commercial flights. 
I december 2017 brjade det ven stdja tervndanden via reguljrflyg.
14 Detailed information on the financial implementation of AMIF, EASO and Frontex funds can be found in Annex I. 9 15 In 2017, we published a report3 on the hotspots in Greece and Italy. 
14 Utfrlig information om det finansiella genomfrandet av medel inom ramen fr Amif, Easo och Frontex finns i bilaga I. 15 r 2017 offentliggjorde vi en rapport3 om de hotspots som finns i Grekland och Italien.
The European Parliament endorsed its conclusions4 and asked us to Ňconsider a quick follow-up report on the functioning of the hotspots, adopting a broader scope by including also an analysis of the follow-up procedures, i.e. the asylum, relocation and return proceduresÓ. 
Europaparlamentet stllde sig bakom slutsatserna i rapporten4 och bad oss att Óvervg[a] en snabb uppfljningsrapport om mottagningscentrumens funktionsstt med ett bredare tillvgagngsstt som inbegriper en analys av asyl-, omplacerings-och tervndandefrfarandenaÓ.
10 3 4 Special report 06/2017: ŇEU response to the refugee crisis: the ÔhotspotŐ approachÓ. 
10 3 Srskild rapport nr 6/2017 EU:s svar p flyktingkrisen: systemet med mottagningscentrum (hotspots).
EP (CONT) Working Document PE604.614v01-00. 
4 Europaparlamentets (budgetkontrollutskottet) arbetsdokument PE604.614v01-00.
11 Hotspots Relocation AMIF funding EU agencies Asylum in Greece Asylum in Italy Returns Audit scope and approach 16 The objective of this performance audit was to determine whether EU support to migration management (including the hotspot approach) had helped bring about effective and swift asylum and return procedures in Greece and Italy. 
11 Hotspots Omplacering AMIF-finansiering EU-byrer Asyl i Grekland Asyl i Italien tervndanden Revisionens inriktning och omfattning samt revisionsmetod 16 Mlet fr denna effektivitetsrevision var att avgra huruvida EU:s std till migrationshantering (inbegripet hotspot-systemet) har bidragit till att f till stnd effektiva och snabba asyl-och tervndandefrfaranden i Grekland och Italien.
To answer this main audit question, we addressed two sub-questions: (a) Has the EU-funded support action for Greece and Italy achieved its objectives? 
Fr att besvara den vergripande revisionsfrgan formulerade vi tv delfrgor: a) Har den EU-finansierade stdtgrden fr Grekland och Italien uppntt sina ml?
To answer this sub-question, we assessed whether our recommendations in special report 06/2017 had been implemented and whether the temporary emergency relocation schemes had achieved their objectives. 
Fr att besvara denna delfrga bedmde vi huruvida vra rekommendationer i srskild rapport nr 6/2017 genomfrts och om de tillflliga omplaceringsmekanismerna fr ndsituationer hade uppntt sina ml.
We also assessed the relevance and design of a sample of EU-funded support actions, and looked at whether planned outputs had been delivered and objectives met. (b) Have the asylum and return procedures in Italy and Greece been effective and swift? 
Vi bedmde ven relevansen hos och utformningen av ett urval EU-finansierade stdtgrder och underskte om planerade resultat uppntts och ml uppfyllts. b) Har asyl-och tervndandefrfarandena i Italien och Grekland varit effektiva och snabba?
To answer this sub-question, we examined whether the performance of asylum and return procedures in the two Member States had improved since 2015. 
Fr att besvara denna delfrga underskte vi huruvida effektiviteten inom asyl-och tervndandefrfarandena i de tv medlemsstaterna hade frbttrats sedan 2015.
We analysed performance on the basis of data collected by the Commission, EASO, Frontex and the national authorities, and identified the reasons for any underperformance. 
Vi analyserade effektiviteten p grundval av uppgifter som samlats in av kommissionen, Easo, Frontex och de nationella myndigheterna, och faststllde orsakerna till eventuella otillfredsstllande resultat.
17 The audit covered the period from 2015 (when the migration crisis began and the first hotspots were set up in Greece and Italy) until the end of 2018. 
17 Revisionen omfattade perioden frn 2015 (nr migrationskrisen brjade och de frsta mottagningscentrumen upprttades i Grekland och Italien) till slutet av 2018.
18 Our sample of EU-funded support actions contained six AMIF emergency assistance (AMIF EMAS) and ten AMIF national programme (AMIF NP) projects. 
18 Vrt urval av EU-finansierade stdtgrder omfattade sex projekt med Amifs katastrofbistnd och tio projekt inom nationella Amif-program.
We exercised our professional judgement when selecting the projects to ensure balanced coverage of the audited procedures (asylum (excluding reception), relocation and return) and types of implementing partners (UN agencies or national authorities), also considering financial materiality and the period of implementation. 
Vi anvnde vrt professionella omdme nr vi valde ut projekten i syfte att skerstlla en balanserad tckning av de granskade frfarandena (asyl (exklusive mottagning, omplacering och tervndande) och typerna av genomfrandepartner (FN-organ eller nationella myndigheter), och beaktade ven finansiell storlek och genomfrandeperioder.
Further EU support action examined included the 2018 EASO operational support to asylum procedures in Greece and Italy, and the 2018 Frontex return support to Greece and Italy. 
Andra EU-stdtgrder som undersktes var Easos operativa std 2018 till asylfrfaranden i Grekland och Italien samt Frontex tervndandestd 2018 till Grekland och Italien.
The full list of audited projects can be found in Annex II. 
Den fullstndiga frteckningen ver granskade projekt finns i bilaga II.
19 Our main auditees were the European Commission, EASO and Frontex, as the providers of EU support to asylum, relocation and return procedures (see also Figure 3). 
12 Hotspots Omplacering AMIF-finansiering EU-byrer Asyl i Grekland Asyl i Italien tervndanden 19 Vra viktigaste granskningsobjekt var kommissionen, Easo och Frontex i egenskap av de organ som tillhandahller EU-std till asyl-, omplacerings-och tervndandefrfaranden (se ven figur 3).
In addition, we visited the Greek and Italian authorities and hotspots, and the international and non-governmental organisations implementing AMIF projects in Greece and Italy. 
Dessutom beskte vi grekiska och italienska myndigheter och hotspots, och de internationella och icke-statliga organisationer som genomfr Amif-projekt i Grekland och Italien.
The audit work included desk reviews of directives and regulations, strategies, policy documents, guidelines, evaluations, monitoring reports and internal documents, as well as papers published by national authorities, research bodies, academics and non-governmental organisations. 
Revisionsarbetet omfattade skrivbordsgranskningar av direktiv och frordningar, strategier, policydokument, riktlinjer, utvrderingar, vervakningsrapporter och interna handlingar samt dokument som offentliggjorts av nationella myndigheter, forskningsorgan, akademiker och icke-statliga organisationer.
European Border and Coast Guard Agency Temporary emergency relocation schemes Return procedures from Greece and Italy AMIF emergency assistance and national programmes in Greece and Italy 12 Hotspots Relocation AMIF funding EU agencies Asylum in Greece Asylum in Italy Returns 20 We did not assess the validity of individual asylum and return decisions, since this would involve entering into the merits of individual cases, which is the jurisdiction of national administrative/judicial authorities and, in the final stage, the European Court of Human Rights. 
Figur 3 Đ Revisionens inriktning och omfattning Klla: Revisionsrtten. 13 Hotspots Omplacering AMIF-finansiering EU-byrer Asyl i Grekland Asyl i Italien tervndanden 20 Vi bedmde inte giltigheten hos enskilda asyl-och tervndandebeslut eftersom det skulle innebra att vi mste bedma enskilda renden, vilka faller inom de nationella administrativa/rttsliga myndigheternas behrighet och, i sista hand, Europeiska domstolen fr de mnskliga rttigheternas.
13 Hotspots Relocation AMIF funding EU agencies Asylum in Greece Asylum in Italy Returns 21 The purpose of the audit was not to assess the reliability of the statistical data provided by the Commission, EASO, Frontex, the national authorities or the projectsŐ implementing partners. 
21 Revisionen syftade inte till att bedma tillfrlitligheten hos de statistikuppgifter som presenterats av kommissionen, Easo, Frontex, de nationella myndigheterna eller projektens genomfrandepartner.
14 Hotspots Relocation AMIF funding EU agencies Asylum in Greece Asylum in Italy Returns Observations EU migration management action in Greece and Italy was relevant but has not reached its full potential 22 We examined whether: (a) our recommendations in special report 06/2017 were implemented; (b) all new irregular migrants were registered and fingerprinted, both inside and outside the hotspots; (c) the temporary emergency relocation schemes achieved their targets and objective; (d) the 20 examined EU support actions in Greece and Italy were well designed in view of (i) their relevance for addressing the needs identified, (ii) SMART objectives and RACER indicators; (iii) the absence of overlap with other EU-funded activities; (iv) the emergency situation (for AMIF EMAS projects), and (v) the transition strategy from emergency to any longer-term national programmes in place; (e) the 20 examined EU support actions delivered what was planned; (f) a robust performance monitoring and reporting framework was in place. 
14 Hotspots Omplacering AMIF-finansiering EU-byrer Asyl i Grekland Asyl i Italien tervndanden Iakttagelser EU:s migrationshanteringstgrd i Grekland och Italien var relevant men har inte ntt sin fulla potential 22 Vi underskte huruvida a) vra rekommendationer i srskild rapport nr 6/2017 har genomfrts, b) alla nya irreguljra migranter registrerades och lmnade fingeravtryck, bde i och utanfr mottagningscentrumen, c) de tillflliga omplaceringsmekanismerna fr ndsituationer uppndde sina mlvrden och ml, d) de 20 EU-stdtgrder i Grekland och Italien som granskades var vl utformade med avseende p i) deras relevans vad gller att tillgodose de konstaterade behoven, ii) SMART-ml och Racer-indikatorer, iii) avsaknaden av verlappning med andra EU-finansierade verksamheter, iv) ndsituationen (fr Amif-projekt fr katastrofbistnd) och v) vergngsstrategin frn ndprogram till eventuella nationella lngsiktiga program som finns, e) de 20 genomfrda EU-stdtgrderna som granskades hade uppntt det som planerats, f) det fanns en stabil prestationsvervaknings-och rapporteringsram.
Key recommendations are under implementation in the Greek hotspots, full registration and fingerprinting achieved 23 We assessed the implementation of the hotspot approach in Greece and Italy in our special report 6/2017 and made 11 recommendations, which the Commission and the relevant agencies all accepted. 
Viktiga rekommendationer hller p att genomfras vid hotspots i Grekland, och fullstndig registrering och fingeravtryckstagning har genomfrts 23 Vi bedmde genomfrandet av hotspot-systemet i Grekland och Italien i vr srskilda rapport nr 6/2017 och lmnade elva rekommendationer, som alla har godknts av kommissionen och de berrda byrerna.
Of these recommendations, they have fully implemented six. 
Av dessa rekommendationer har de genomfrt sex fullt ut.
24 Two key recommendations are under implementation: 1.1 (support in addressing the lack of hotspot capacity in Greece) and 2.1 (help to ensure that unaccompanied minors are treated in accordance with international standards). 
15 Hotspots Omplacering AMIF-finansiering EU-byrer Asyl i Grekland Asyl i Italien tervndanden 24 Tv viktiga rekommendationer hller p att genomfras: 1.1 (std fr att tgrda de grekiska mottagningscentrumens brist p kapacitet) och 2.1 (hjlp fr att skerstlla att ensamkommande barn behandlas i enlighet med internationella normer).
Two recommendations have been implemented as far as the Commission and the Agencies are concerned: 2.2 (insisting on the appointment of a child protection officer for every hotspot) and 3.1 15 Hotspots Relocation AMIF funding EU agencies Asylum in Greece Asylum in Italy Returns (asking for more Member State experts to better cover hotspot needs). 
Tv rekommendationer har genomfrts i de delar som gller kommissionen och byrerna: 2.2 (en barnskyddsansvarig mste utses vid varje mottagningscentrum) och 3.1 (begran om fler experter frn medlemsstaterna s att behoven vid mottagningscentrumen kan tillgodoses bttre).
One recommendation Đ 3.2 (expert deployments by Member States should be long enough) Đ has not been implemented. 
En rekommendation Đ 3.2 (utstationeringen av experter frn medlemsstaterna br pg tillrckligt lnge) Đ har inte genomfrts.
We present a detailed assessment in Annex III and paragraphs 25 to 30 below. 
Vi presenterar en utfrlig bedmning i bilaga III och punkterna 25Đ30 nedan.
Greek hotspots lack capacity 25 The Italian hotspots are either empty or almost empty, clean and well equipped. 
Kapaciteten vid de grekiska mottagningscentrumen r bristfllig 25 De italienska mottagningscentrumen r antingen tomma eller nstan tomma, rena och vlutrustade.
By stark contrast, the living conditions in Greek hotspots, in particular on Lesbos and Samos, are poor owing to overcrowding, a lack of doctors and inadequate security. 
I bjrt kontrast till detta r levnadsvillkoren i grekiska mottagningscentrum, i synnerhet p Lesvos och Samos, dliga p grund av verbelggning, brist p lkare och otillrcklig skerhet.
The hotspots on Lesbos and Samos, with capacity for 3 100 and 640 migrants, were housing 5 096 and 3 745 people, respectively, at the time of our audit visit in February 2019. 
Mottagningscentrumen p Lesvos och Samos, med kapacitet fr 3 100 och 640 migranter, hyste 5 096 respektive 3 745 personer vid tidpunkten fr vrt granskningsbesk i februari 2019.
Many of them were living in tents outside the hotspot perimeter (Picture 1). 
Mnga av dem bodde i tlt utanfr mottagningscentrumets omrde (bild 1).
Slow procurement procedures, the delayed execution of maintenance and upgrade projects, continuing arrivals of new migrants and lengthy asylum procedures combine to pose an obstacle to any rapid improvement in the situation5. 
Lngsamma upphandlingsfrfaranden, frsenat utfrande av projekt fr underhll och upprustning, nya migranter som fortfarande anlnder och utdragna asylfrfaranden utgr tillsammans ett hinder fr en snabb frbttring av situationen5.