natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission points out that it does not have the legal authority to harmonise the national indemnification systems in the event of an epidemic. 
Kommissionen erinrar om att den inte har rttslig befogenhet att harmonisera de nationella reglerna fr ersttning vid epidemier.
There were four Commission Regulations governing the United Kingdom, Portugal, France and Ireland on the compensation system laid down under measures for monitoring and eradicating bovine spongiform encephalitis (BSE) for animals slaughtered under the selective reform provided for by a Member State eradication plan and approved by the Commission. 
Det system fr ersttningar som infrdes i samband med bekmpningen och utrotningen av bovin spongiform encefalopati (BSE) avsg djur som slaktats enligt den selektiva revisionen av medlemsstaternas utrotningsplaner. Planerna godkndes av kommissionen och blev freml fr fyra kommissionsfrord-ningar om Frenade kungariket, Portugal, Frankrike respektive Irland.
The same principles regarding the compensation system were enshrined in all four Regulations, including Regulation (EC) No 164/97 on France. 
Samma principer tillmpades i de fyra frordningarna, ven i frordning (EG) nr 164/97 om Frankrike, avseende reglerna fr ersttningssystemet.
As regards animals which have contracted BSE, the Commission emphasises that indemnification of the owners is not covered by the emergency fund (Articles 3, 4, 6 and 11) of Decision 90/424/EEC (1). 
Nr det gller grnserna fr ersttning fr BSE-smittade djur vill kommissionen framhlla att ersttningen till gare av BSE-smittade ntkreatur inte omfattas av ndstdet (artiklarna 3, 4, 6 och 11) i beslut 90/424/EEG (1).
Recent decisions on the Community contribution to costs incurred by Member States stipulated the level of indemnification eligible for Community funding. 
I de senaste besluten om gemenskapsbidrag till medlemsstaternas kostnader har nrmare regler fr vad som berttigar till gemenskapsbidrag slagits fast.
66. 
Endast djurets 66.
The Commission has no legal authority to harmonise the Member StatesŐ systems for indemnification of livestock farmers nor do the Member States want them to be harmonised. 
Kommissionen har inte rttslig befogenhet att organisera system fr ersttning till uppfdare i medlemsstaterna; medlemsstaterna vill heller inte ha ngon sdan harmonisering.
The differences in the Member States noted by the Court were also noted by the Commission during its in situ checks and are the result of the choices made by the Member States. 
De skillnader som revisionsrtten konstaterar mellan medlemsstaterna har ocks konstaterats av kommissionen under kontroller p plats. De beror p medlemsstaternas val.
The Commission made appropriate financial adjustments for any irregularities having an impact on the Community budget, as detailed below. 
Oegentligheter som pverkat gemenskapsbudgeten har rttats till av kommissionen enligt vad som anges nedan.
The Commission takes care to preserve the principle of equal treatment of the Member States in all its co-funding decisions. 
Kommissionen vinnlgger sig fr sin del om principen om likabehandling av alla medlemsstater i alla sina beslut om medfinansiering.
The fact that the decisions are subject to the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health helps to ensure that this is the case. 
Det frhllandet att besluten frelggs Stndiga kommittn fr livsmedelskedjan och djurhlsa fr yttrande bidrar till att denna princip fljs. 67Đ71.
The exemptions granted by Regulation (EC) No 1458/2001 adopted on 17 July 2001 on the application of premium schemes are to be seen in the light of the principle that the direct payment system is designed to compensate for the effects on producersŐ income of the progressive reduction of the level of market support introduced by the Agenda 2000 reform. 
De undantag som infrdes genom frordning (EG) nr 1458/2001 av den 17 juli 2001 i frga om tillmpningen av djurbidrag br betraktas mot bakgrund av att systemet med direktbetalningar r avsett att kompensera fr inverkan p lantbrukarnas inkomster av den successiva snkningen av marknadsstdet i enlighet med reformen Agenda 2000.
The Commission therefore holds that the premiums may be granted to the producer irrespective of any other circumstances linked to the health situation of animals in the Member States. 
Kommissionen menar att bidrag kan utbetalas till producenter oavsett vilket djur-hlsolge som rder i medlemsstaterna.
The Member States affected by the FMD epidemic asked for exemptions to be adopted from the end of April 2001. 
De medlemsstater som drabbades av mul-och klvsjukeepizoo-tin begrde i slutet av april 2001 att undantag skulle infras.
In response to these requests, the Commission found that the producers were unable to meet certain obligations under the regulations establishing the premium schemes because of measures which restricted the movements of animals in certain regions, adopted under the provisions for combating the spread of the FMD epidemic. 
I sin handlggning av begran fann kommissionen att uppfdarna inte kunde uppfylla vissa krav i frordningarna om bidragssystemet p grund av djurens inskrnkta rrelsefrihet i vissa regioner. Inskrnkningarna hade ju som bekant infrts fr att bekmpa mul-och klvsjukan.
A series of proposals was put before the Beef Management Committee in mid-May, on which it finally gave a favourable opinion on 29 June 2001. 
En rad frslag lmnades i mitten av maj till Frvaltningskommittn fr ntktt, vilken slutligen lmnade ett positivt yttrande den 29 juni 2001.
The process of adopting Regulation (EC) No 1458/2001 hence took two months from the time when the Commission was asked to take action. 
Det tog allts tv mnader att anta frordningen (EG) nr 1458/2001 frn det att kommissionen ombads agera.
As direct payments can be granted under these circumstances, the Commission feels that it is up to the Member States to ensure, during accompanying or subsequent checks of amounts set in another context for indemnification of producers in compliance with veterinary provisions, that producers do not receive the premiums twice. 
Eftersom direktbetalningar i enlighet med detta kunde betalas, anser kommissionen att det r medlemsstaternas ansvar att se till att producenterna inte fr betalt tv gnger, lmpligen vid samtidiga kontroller eller kontroller i efterhand av belopp frn andra hll i syfte att faststlla producenternas ersttning enligt gllande veterinrbestmmelser. marknadsvrde omedelbart fre slakt gemenskapsfinansiering. berttigar till 63.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/39 The Commission considers that, under such circumstances it would in future be advisable to include, either in the rules governing direct payments or in the veterinary decisions conferring entitlement to indemnification, a clause to guarantee that no double payments are made and to place the responsibility for this clearly in the hands of the Member States. 
3.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 54/39 Kommissionen anser att det i sdana omstndigheter vore lmpligt att i framtiden antingen infra bestmmelser fr direktbetalningar eller i veterinrbeslut om ersttning ta med en klausul fr att garantera att dubbelbetalning inte sker och klargra att medlemsstaterna har ansvaret.
Nevertheless, as part of its task of disease management, the Commission has taken the necessary measures to limit the impact of over-assessment of the price of animals on the Community budget. 
Kommissionen har dock i sin hantering av epizootin sett till att begrnsa konsekvenserna fr gemenskapens budget av vervrderade djur.
Following in situ checks, the average correction rate for the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands and Ireland was 55 % or EUR 583 million of a total requested of 1 051 million. 
Efter kontroller p plats sattes den genomsnittliga korrektionskoefficienten fr Frenade kungariket, Frankrike, Nederlnderna och Irland till 55 % motsvarande totalt 583 miljoner euro av totala ansprk p 1 051 miljoner euro.
72 and 73. 
72 och 73.
The system of direct payments, including the slaughtering premium, is designed to compensate for the effect on producersŐ income of the gradual reduction of the level of market support introduced by the Agenda 2000 reform. 
Systemet med direktbetalningar, inklusive slaktbidrag, r avsett att kompensera producenterna fr de successivt minskade stdniverna enligt reformpaketet Agenda 2000.
The Commission took the view that there was good reason for granting a premium for animals slaughtered to combat FMD, if the regulatory conditions for granting the premium were met and the animals were slaughtered in a slaughterhouse. 
Kommissionen ansg att det var befogat att bevilja slaktbidrag fr djur som slaktats p grund av mul-och klvsjukan s snart som frutsttningarna fr bidraget frelg och djuren slaktats i ett slakteri.
The scope of these regulations was confirmed on several occasions, particularly by the Beef Management Committee at the time of the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 2777/2000 on exceptional measures to support the beef market (purchase for destruction system). 
Bestmmelsernas rckvidd har bekrftats flera gnger, bl.a. inom Frvaltningskommittn fr ntktt och i och med antagandet av frordning (EG) nr 2777/2000 om undantagstgrder till std fr ntkttsmarknaden (inkp av ktt fr destruktion).
It was communicated in June 2001 to the authorities of the Netherlands in response to their question on the eligibility for the premium of animals slaughtered in the course of a FMD epidemic and was confirmed in February 2004 to the Netherlands Minister of Agriculture, specifying that the premium could be granted for animals slaughtered in a slaughterhouse as long as the sum of the premium was neither included in the evaluation of animals for the purposes of veterinary compensation nor paid on that count, in order to prevent double payment. 
Detta meddelades de nederlndska myndigheterna i juni 2001 som svar p deras frga om djur som slaktats p grund av mul-och klvsjukan berttigade till slaktbidrag, och det bekrftades till det nederlndska jordbruksministeriet i februari 2004. Vid det tillfllet ppekades att slaktbidrag fr beviljas fr djur som slaktas p slakteri, frutsatt att bidragsbeloppet inte rknas in i vrderingen av djuret fr den veterinra ersttningen och inte heller betalas ut, s att dubbla ersttningar undviks.
The procedure followed and the decisions notified were intended not to be detrimental to the interests of the beneficiaries. 
Mlet med dessa rutiner och beslut var att inte skada bidragsmottagarnas intressen.
The information supplied by the Netherlands Agricultural Services show that of 1 278 holdings affected, 791 had the animals slaughtered in a slaughterhouse. 
Enligt uppgift frn de nederlndska jordbruksmyndigheterna fick av 1 278 drabbade anlggningar 791 sina djur slaktade p slakteri.
Council Decision 90/424/EC affords only limited legal scope for establishing the arrangements for the Community to contribute to expenditure incurred by the Member State. 
Rdets beslut 90/424/EEG erbjuder sm mjligheter att ange tillmpningsfreskrifter fr gemenskapens ekonomiska bidrag till medlemsstaternas utgifter.
To this effect, any draft regulation prepared by the Commission laying down rules for eligibility for Community financing must have Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 as its legal basis. 
Drfr br alla frslag till frordningar som lggs fram av kommissionen om berttigande till gemenskapsfinansiering ha rdets frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 som rttslig grund.
The draft decision laying down rules for eligibility to Community financing of emergency action and combating FMD comprises an annex setting out the supporting documents to be provided on request by the competent supervisory authorities. 
Utkastet till beslut om bestmmelser fr berttigande till gemenskapsfinansiering av ndtgrder och bekmpning av mul-och klvsjuka innehller en bilaga dr det anges vilka verifikat som p begran skall lmnas av den myndighet som ansvarar fr kontrollen.
Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 is applicable with respect to supporting documents, as is pointed out specifically in each veterinary co-financing decision. 
Nr det gller verifikat r artikel 9 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 tillmplig, vilket framhlls uttryckligen i alla beslut om veterinr medfinansiering.
The Member States therefore know what information they need to provide and substantiate when checks are carried out. The examples quoted by the Court, which were also noted by the Commission during its in situ audits, do not really indicate a problem in defining supporting documents, but highlight the poor quality of them in certain Member States. 
De exempel som revisionsrtten nmner har ocks konstaterats av kommissionen vid revisioner p plats. De r egentligen inte ett tecken p att det finns problem med att definiera verifikat, utan snarare ett bevis p att verifikaten hller en mindre lmplig kvalitet i vissa medlemsstater.
As the Commission has not yet had any problems of access to administrative information with the Member States and each national administrative system and each epidemic is different, it would appear difficult to draw up a priori an exhaustive list of supporting documents to be provided. 
Kommissionen har hittills i sina kontakter med medlemsstaterna inte sttt p ngra problem med att f tillgng till frvaltningsuppgifter, och d alla nationella frvaltningar och alla epizootier r olika frefaller det opraktiskt att upprtta en uttmmande frteckning ver alla verifikat som skall lmnas.
Having said that, the Commission did have a problem with access to the data held by livestock farmers (operating registers, invoices for the purchase of slaughtered animals, etc.) during its checks. 
Dremot har kommissionen under sina kontroller haft vissa problem med att f tillgng till uppfdarnas uppgifter (driftsregister, inkpsfakturor fr slaktade djur).
This point will be clarified legally with the Member States with a view to future Community reimbursement. 
Detta kommer att frtydligas ur rttslig synpunkt med medlemsstaterna nr det gller gemenskapsersttning i framtiden.
In general, the Member States are familiar with the idea of indemnifying animals Ôat their value prior to being contami-natedŐ, as it had already been used previously for funding purposes. 
I allmnhet fr idn om att erstta djuren Ótill det vrde de hade innan de blev smittadeÓ sgas vara knd i medlemsstaterna, eftersom den tillmpats i tidigare fall.
The Commission would like to emphasise that it did give instructions to Member States on how to apply for reimbursement. 
Kommissionen vill framhlla att den gett instruktioner till medlemsstaterna om deras anskningar om ersttning.
C 54/40 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 Also, Article 55 of Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 obliges Member States to lay down rules on sanctions applicable to infringements of feed and food law and other Community provisions relating to the protection of animal health and welfare, and to take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. 
C 54/40 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 3.3.2005 Vidare skall medlemsstaterna enligt artikel 55 i frordning (EG) nr 882/2004 faststlla bestmmelser om sanktioner vid vertrdelser av foder-och livsmedelslagstiftningen liksom andra gemenskapsbestmmelser om djurskydd och djurhlsa och vidta alla erforderliga tgrder fr att se till att dessa tillmpas.
The sanctions provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 
Sanktionerna skall vara effektiva, proportionerliga och avskrckande.
In its proposal for a Regulation on feed and food controls (COM(2003) 52), failures to comply with the restrictions imposed by the authorities on the movement of animals or products were listed as criminal offences (Annex VI, Point 7 (b)). 
Enligt kommissionens frslag till frordning om livsmedels-och foderkontroller (KOM(2003) 52) skulle underltenhet att flja myndigheternas restriktioner fr djurs eller produkters rrlighet vara ett brott (bilaga VI, punkt 7 b).
These provisions were not maintained by the Council and the European Parliament. 
Rdet och Europaparlamentet strk det.
In the event of an outbreak it is only important to know which animals of susceptible species are on the holding in order to apply the measures correctly and in particular to prevent or detect illegal movement of potentially infected or contaminated animals. 
Om ett utbrott ger rum r det bara viktigt att knna till vilka djur av mottagliga arter som finns p anlggningen fr att tillmpa tgrderna korrekt, i synnerhet fr att frebygga eller upptcka olagliga transporter av potentiellt angripna eller smittade djur.
Therefore, in the case of a suspected or confirmed outbreak Directive 85/511/EEC requires the competent authorities to carry out a census of all animals on the holding, including the animals that died from the disease. 
Om ett utbrott misstnks eller bekrftats krvs drfr enligt direktiv 85/511/EEG att de behriga myndigheterna inventerar alla djur p anlggningen, inklusive djur som dtt av sjukdomen.
These inventories must be kept up-to-date, which cannot be always ensured by other data bases. 
Inventeringen mste hllas  jour, ngot som inte alltid kan sktas genom andra databaser.
The shortcomings identified by the Court are not the result of a lack of guidance by the Commission but by the administrative disorganisation attributable to the Member States, which can be accounted for to some extent by the circumstances of the crisis. 
De brister som revisionsrtten konstaterat beror inte p att kommissionen underltit att ge riktlinjer utan p oordning i vissa medlemsstaters frvaltning, vilket i viss mn kan frklaras av krisen.
The Commission does not share the CourtŐs view that the arrangements for reimbursement were not laid down in good time. (i) The Commission has not changed the eligibility rules appreciably since Decision 90/424/EC was adopted. 
Kommissionen delar inte revisionsrttens uppfattning att reglerna fr ersttning angetts sent. i) Kommissionen har inte vsentligt ndrat bestmmelserna fr vad som berttigar till bidrag sedan beslut 90/424/EEG antogs.
The CommissionŐs specific financing decisions were always adopted as soon as it was technically possible, i.e. when the Commission had received an application for co-funding, the statement of expenditure supplied by the Member State was sufficiently reliable and the budgetary authority had made provision for financial cover for the funding. 
De srskilda finansieringsbesluten har kommissionen alltid antagit s snart detta varit praktiskt mjligt, dvs. nr kommissionen frfogade ver en anskan om medfinansiering och tillrckligt tillfrlitlig utgiftsredovisning frn medlemsstaten samt nr budgetmyndigheten hade anslagit medel till finansieringen.
The Commission has not received any complaints about the late decisions mentioned by the Court. (ii) The Commission has not appreciably changed the eligibility rules, since the costs incurred for preventive slaughter have always been regarded as eligible for Community funding, as they were crucial in combating the epidemic. 
Kommissionen har inte mottagit ngra klagoml eller anklagelser avseende de sent fattade beslut som revisionsrtten nmner. ii) Kommissionen har inte vsentligt ndrat bestmmelserna fr vad som berttigar till bidrag eftersom kostnader fr djur som slaktats i frebyggande syfte alltid betraktats som berttigande till gemenskapsfinansiering, d ju sdan slakt har central betydelse fr epizootibekmpning.
The funding provided for by the four decisions is based on Article 5(3) of Decision 90/424/EEC. (iii) Finally,prioritywasgivenbyboththeMemberStatesandthe Commission to Community financing of indemnification of livestock farmers. 
Finansieringen i de fyra besluten bygger p artikel 5.3 i beslut 90/424/EEG. iii) Slutligen prioriterade bde medlemsstaterna och kommissionen gemenskapsfinansiering av ersttning till djurgarna.
It was not until 27 February 2003 that the United Kingdom was able to present a provisional request for reimbursement of operational costs in addition to indemnification. 
Frenade kungariket kunde inte frrn den 27 februari 2003 lgga fram en preliminr anskan om ersttning av kompletterande driftskostnader vid sidan av ersttningarna.
Detailed information on outbreaks is available in the ADNS data base. 
De nrmare uppgifterna om dessa utbrott finns i ADNS-databasen.
The model was not included in the annex of the specific financing decisions but was communicated directly to the Member States. 
Ordningen har dock nnu inte frts in i bilagan till de srskilda finansieringsbesluten utan meddelats medlemsstaterna direkt.
This problem was noted by the Commission. 
Kommissionen har i sjlva verket uppmrksammat detta problem.
Given the scale and diversity of the expenditure presented, the Commission takes the view that the periods for checks are reasonable. 
Med tanke p anskningarnas omfattning och stora spnnvidd anser kommissionen att tidsutdrkten fr kontrollerna varit rimlig.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/41 Moreover, the CourtŐs statement relates only to payment of the balance. 
3.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 54/41 Dessutom avser revisionsrttens pstende enbart slutbetalningen.
In fact, sizable advances were paid to the Member States after the financing decisions were adopted. 
I sjlva verket betalades omfattande frskott ut till medlemsstaterna sedan finansieringsbesluten fattats.
These were paid in 2002 (EUR 355 million to the United Kingdom on 22 February 2002, EUR 3,3 million to France on 14 March 2002, EUR 2,7 million to Ireland on 1 March 2002 and EUR 39 million to the Netherlands on 26 February 2002). 
Frskotten betalades 2002 (355 miljoner den 22 februari 2002 till Frenade kungariket, 3,3 miljoner till Frankrike den 14 mars 2002, 2,7 miljoner den 1 mars 2002 till Irland och 39 miljoner den 26 februari 2002 till Nederlnderna).
These EUR 400 million represent around 86 % of the total finally paid out. 
Dessa 400 miljoner euro utgjorde ungefr 86 % av det totala slutligen utbetalda beloppet.
The reimbursement rates for veterinary expenditure were established by a Council decision. 
Satserna fr terbetalning av veterinrutgifter har faststllts i rdets beslut.
In the past, there was a discrepancy between the rates applied by DG SANCO and DG AGRI in the pig sector. 
Tidigare fanns det en skillnad mellan de satser som GD Hlsa och konsumentskydd och GD Jordbruk tillmpade p grissektorn.
Since the swine fever epidemic in 1997, the rates have been harmonised and set at a co-funding rate of 50 %. 
Efter svinpestepizootin 1997 standardiserades satserna till 50 % medfinansiering.
Since its first report in 1999 on ÔIncome Insurance in European AgricultureŐ, the Commission has conducted a follow-up study on ÔFinancing risk for livestock epidemicsŐ that includes an analysis of current practices in Member States and outlines possible solutions for the future. 
Sedan sin frsta rapport 1999 om inkomstfrskring i det europeiska jordbruket har kommissionen gjort en uppfljande underskning om finansieringsriskerna fr kreatursepizoo-tier som innefattar en analys av rdande praxis i medlemsstaterna och ngra skisserade lsningar fr framtiden.
It appears from that study that there is no simple solution to this complex issue. 
Underskningen ger vid handen att det inte finns ngra enkla lsningar p detta komplicerade problem.