natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although preparation originally began in 1998, at the end of 2005 it was still not completed (see Box 3 for details). work on how to better take into account environment questions in development projects and contribute to disseminating best practice. 
Arbetet med att utarbeta handboken inleddes 1998, men i slutet av 2005 hade det fortfarande inte slutfrts (se ruta 3 fr mer detaljerade uppgifter). med frgan om hur man bttre kan ta hnsyn till miljfrgor i utvecklingsprojekt och bidra till att sprida bsta arbetsmetoder.
However, while the network met four times up to May 2004, no meetings have been held since. 
Kontaktpersonerna i ntverket trffades fyra gnger fram till maj 2004, men sedan dess har inga mten hllits.
The network was also largely centred on officials in Europeaid and did not sufficiently incorporate other Commission services, in particular the Delegations. 
Ntverket bestod till stor del av tjnstemn vid EuropeAid och omfattade inte i tillrckligt hg grad vriga kommissionsavdelningar, srskilt delegationerna.
The network has therefore thus far made little contribution to building up in-house capacity. 
Ntverket har drfr knappast bidragit till att bygga upp den interna kapaciteten.
Systems for assessing the environmental performance of the CommissionŐs development aid 24. 
System fr bedmningen av utvecklingsbistndets inverkan p miljn 24.
The Commission also conducts evaluations, both at the level of regulations and sectors, which are organised by the Europeaid Evaluation Unit, and of individual projects, which are organised by its Delegations. 
Kommissionen genomfr ocks utvrderingar, dels av frordningar och sektorer, vilka anordnas av EuropeAids utvr-deringsenhet, dels av enskilda projekt, vilka anordnas av kommissionens delegationer.
The CommissionŐs operational framework (see paragraph 16) required the independent evaluation of the environmental performance of EC aid over the period 1996 to 2000, as part of a regular evaluation process for environmental performance. 
I kommissionens operativa ram fr ytterligare integrering av miljaspekterna (se punkt 16) stlldes krav p att det som en del av en regelbunden miljutvrdering skulle genomfras en oberoende utvrdering av vilken inverkan EG:s bistnd hade p miljn under perioden 1996Đ2000.
This could have been used to establish baseline data and test out performance indicators (see paragraph 17). 
Vid denna utvrdering skulle man ha kunnat faststlla grundlggande uppgifter och testa resultatindikatorer (se punkt 17).
In addition, it could have identified the lessons to be learned from previous interventions and these could have been used as inputs to developing a comprehensive strategy for the environment (see paragraph 11). 
Den kunde ven ha visat vilka lrdomar man skulle kunna dra av tidigare insatser och dessa lrdomar skulle ha kunnat vara utgngspunkten fr utvecklingen av en vergripande miljstrategi (se punkt 11).
However, the evaluation, which was planned to be completed by mid-2002, has still not been carried out (1). 
Utvrderingen, som skulle ha slutfrts i mitten av 2002, har fortfarande inte genomfrts (1).
At the level of individual environment projects the CommissionŐs headquarters have no system for obtaining and assessing the results of evaluations organised by Commission delegations. 
Nr det gller enskilda miljprojekt har inte kommissionens centrala avdelningar ngot system som innebr att de kan erhlla och bedma resultatet av de utvrderingar som kommissionens delegationer genomfr.
Consequently there are no procedures for disseminating lessons learned and best practices from completed evaluation projects. 
Fljaktligen finns det inget frfarande fr att sprida lrdomar och bsta arbetsmetoder frn avslutade utvrderingsprojekt.
There is similarly no system in place for obtaining and assessing information on the environmental impact of non-environmental projects. 
Det finns inte heller ngot system som gr det mjligt att erhlla och bedma uppgifter om icke miljrelaterade projekts inverkan p miljn.
The Commission has had a system in place since 2001 to monitor ongoing development projects called the Ôresults oriented monitoring systemŐ. 
Kommissionen har sedan 2001 ett system fr vervakning av pgende utvecklingsprojekt som kallas Ósystemet med resultatorienterad uppfljningÓ.
The system requires all development projects over one million euro to be visited approximately every twelve months by monitors from consultancy companies contracted by the Commission for this purpose. 
Enligt systemet skall alla utvecklingsprojekt p ver en miljon euro beskas ungefr en gng om ret av kontrollanter frn konsultfretag som kommissionen anlitat fr denna uppgift.
The monitors assess each project and give it a ÔscoreŐ based on a set of five criteria: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability and related sub-criteria including environmental sustainability. 
Kontrollanterna bedmer varje projekt och pongstter det utifrn fem kriterier: relevans, effektivitet, verkningsgrad, genomslag och hllbarhet samt utifrn tillhrande delkriterier dribland miljmssig hllbarhet.
However, the quantitative and qualitative findings of these reports are not systematically analysed by Commission headquarters to assess the overall performance of environment projects and the degree to which the environment has been integrated into other development projects. 
Kommissionens centrala avdelningar analyserar emellertid inte systematiskt de kvantitativa och kvalitativa uppgifterna i dessa rapporter fr att bedma det vergripande resultatet av miljprojekt och i hur hg grad miljaspekter integrerats i andra utvecklingsprojekt.
(1) The Commission did organise a more specific evaluation of the Environment and Tropical Forest budget line, as laid down in the related Regulations in 2004. 
(1) Kommissionen gjorde dremot en mer specifik utvrdering av budgetposten fr milj och tropiska skogar 2004, i enlighet med frordningarna p detta omrde.
Box 3 A Manual for mainstreaming the environment The Commission contracted a consultancy firm in 1998 for 12 months but the manual finally produced in 2001 was considered to be inadequate and was not formally approved. 
Ruta 3 Handbok om integrering av miljaspekter Kommissionen anlitade en konsultfirma 1998 fr 12 mnader, men den handbok som utarbetades under 2001 ansgs otillrcklig och godkndes inte formellt.
The manual has been little used firstly because of its draft status, secondly because it was extremely lengthy, and thirdly because its existence was not even known by some staff. 
Handboken har inte anvnts srskilt mycket, fr det frsta fr att den endast var ett frslag, fr det andra fr att den var extremt lng och fr det tredje fr att mnga anstllda inte ens knde till att den fanns.
Significant work on a revised manual only began in mid-2004 with the contracting of a new consultancy firm. 
Ett omfattande arbete med att omarbeta handboken pbrjades frst i mitten av 2004 genom att en ny konsultfirma anlitades.
Because of the complexity of the task, the higher priority assigned by the Commission to setting up a training programme and frequent changes in the Commission staff managing the contract, the revised manual had still not been completed at the end of 2005. 
Den omarbetade handboken var fortfarande i slutet av 2005 inte frdig, vilket beror p att uppgiften r komplicerad, att kommissionen prioriterat inrttandet av ett fortbildningsprogram hgre och att den personal som handhar kontraktet ofta har bytts ut.
In fact the training courses only began in November 2004 and have not been compulsory. 
Fortbildning-kurserna inleddes i sjlva verket inte frrn i november 2004 och har inte varit obligatoriska.
It was also planned that the training would use the new manual but this has not proved possible (see paragraph 21). 
Enligt planeringen skulle man ven anvnda den nya handboken vid kurserna men det visade sig omjligt (se punkt 21).
While overall attendance levels have been better for training at the Delegations, the number of Commission staff attending is still limited (see Box 4). 
Nivn p deltagarantalet har visserligen varit bttre vid delegationerna, men antalet kommissionsanstllda deltagare r fortfarande litet (se ruta 4).
Box 4 Environmental mainstreaming training For courses at Commission headquarters, the average number of participants per training module was eight, compared with the fifteen planned. 
Ruta 4 Utbildning i integrering av miljaspekter Kurserna vid kommissionens centrala avdelningar hade i genomsnitt tta deltagare vid varje kurstillflle, att jmfra med det planerade antalet som var femton.
Several sessions had to be cancelled because of insufficient participants. 
Flera kurstillfllen mste stllas in p grund av att deltagarantalet var fr lgt.
37 staff from DG Relex attended a half day training course on environmental mainstreaming at the programming stage, however only 9 staff attended the full 2 day training module on this subject, although 2005 was the key year for DG Relex to prepare the CSPs for 2007 to 2013. 
37 personer frn generaldirektoratet fr yttre frbindelser deltog i en halvdagskurs om integrering av miljaspekter under programplaneringsstadiet, men endast nio personer deltog i hela tvdagarskursen i detta mne, trots att 2005 var just det r d generaldirektoratet fr yttre frbindelser skulle utarbeta landstrategidokument fr 2007Đ2013.
For the Delegations, the training budget allocated was only sufficient for courses to be held in 20 Delegations (attended by Delegation staff and staff from organisations in the beneficiary countries). 
Fr delegationerna rckte den budget de tilldelats fr fortbildningen endast till att anordna kurser vid 20 delegationer (dr personal frn delegationerna och personal frn organisationer i mottagarlnderna deltog).
The training took place too late for most Delegations in Asia, Latin America and the Mediterranean to be able to benefit from it when preparing the new CSPs. 
Kurserna anordnades fr sent fr de flesta av delegationerna i Asien, Latinamerika och Medelhavsomrdet fr att de skulle kunna dra nytta av den nr de utarbetade de nya landstrategidokumenten.
One initiative which had the potential to build up the CommissionŐs in-house capacity to manage the environmental aspects of development cooperation was the setting-up in 2003 of an Ôenvironmental focal point networkŐ. 
Ett initiativ som skulle ha kunnat bygga upp kommissionens interna kapacitet att hantera miljaspekter p utvecklingssamarbetet var inrttandet 2003 av ett ntverk av kontaktpunkter p miljomrdet.
The network was intended to identify and link up one official from each unit to 
Avsikten med ntverket var att utse en tjnsteman vid varje enhet till att vara kontaktperson och arbeta
C 235/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.9.2006 27. 
C 235/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 29.9.2006 27.
The Commission uses the OECD DAC financial monitoring and reporting system which is not adequate since it allows projects to be identified where environment-related expenditure has been made but not the amount of that expenditure. 
Kommissionen anvnder OECD:s kommitt fr utveck-lingsbistnds system fr ekonomisk uppfljning och rapportering, vilket inte r lmpligt eftersom det endast gr det mjligt att faststlla inom vilka projekt det har frekommit miljrelaterade utgifter men inte utgiftsbeloppet.
The coding system used by the World Bank tackles this issue (1). 
Med hjlp av det kodsystem som Vrldsbanken anvnder kan detta problem tgrdas (1).
In addition, inconsistent use by the Commission of the marker system established for identifying expenditure made in the context of the MEAs has meant that it has not been able to accurately meet its reporting obligations under the MEAs. 
Dessutom har kommissionen varit inkonsekvent vid anvndningen av det mrkningssystem som skall visa vilka utgifter som frekommit i samband med de internationella miljkonventionerna, vilket innebr att kommissionen inte helt har kunnat fullgra sina skyldigheter nr det gller rapportering inom ramen fr dessa konventioner.
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE COMMISSIONŐS ENVIRONMENTAL MAINSTREAMING Introduction 28. 
EN BED MNING AV NDAMLSENLIGHETEN I KOMMISSIONENS INTEGRERING AV MILJ ASPEKTER Inledning 28.
This part of the report assesses how effectively the Commission has mainstreamed the environment into its development cooperation. 
Denna del av rapporten innehller en bedmning av hur ndamlsenligt kommissionen har integrerat miljaspekterna i sitt utvecklingssamarbete.
The assessment was carried out on three different types of Commission intervention: (a) Country Strategy Papers; (b) budgetary support programmes; (c) non-environment projects. 
Bedmningen avser tre olika typer av insatser frn kommissionen: a) Landstrategidokument. b) Program fr budgetstd. c) Icke miljrelaterade projekt.
Progress was made in 2005 in developing country environmental analysis for new Country Strategy Papers although its impact cannot yet be assessed 29. 
Framsteg gjordes under 2005 i och med att landspecifika miljanalyser togs fram fr nya landstrategidokument, men effekten av dessa kan nnu inte bedmas 29.
The Commission drew up Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) for the first time in 2001 and 2002 for each of the countries and regions to which it gives development assistance in order to set out what form the CommissionŐs assistance should take over the period 2006 to 2007. 
Kommissionen utarbetade landstrategidokument fr frsta gngen 2001 och 2002 fr varje land och region som fr utvecklingsbistnd i syfte att faststlla formen fr kommissionens bistnd under perioden fram till 2006Đ2007.
In principle, CSPs were to take into account each countryŐs development priorities, so as to ensure country ownership, as well as the CommissionŐs own policies. 
I princip skulle man i landstrategidokumenten ta hnsyn till varje lands utvecklingsprioriteringar, fr att ge lnderna egenansvar, samt till kommissionens egen politik.
The CommissionŐs strategy concerning the environmental aspects of its development aid, as set out in both its 2000 Development Policy and the Commission Staff Working Paper on the subject, focused on mainstreaming the environment into all areas of development cooperation. 
Kommissionens strategi fr miljaspekterna p utvecklingsbistndet, enligt utvecklingspolitiken frn r 2000 och arbetsdokumentet frn kommissionens avdelningar om denna frga, r inriktad p integrering av miljaspekterna p alla omrden inom utvecklingssamarbetet.
Therefore it was essential that the environment was mainstreamed into its Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) if the overall strategy was to be effective. 
Det var drfr av avgrande betydelse att miljaspekterna integrerades i landstrategidokumenten fr att den vergripande strategin skulle bli ndamlsenlig.
In fact, reviews of this first generation of CSPs (2001 to 2007) by the Court during the audit and also by the CommissionŐs own services showed that the environment had not been satisfactorily mainstreamed into them. 
Vid revisionsrttens genomgng av frsta generationen landstrategidokument (2001Đ2007) under granskningen och ven vid den genomgng som kommissionens egna avdelningar gjorde framkom att miljaspekterna inte p ett tillfredsstllande stt hade integrerats i dem.
The analysis of environmental issues in the CSPs was generally weak and the CommissionŐs response strategies did not adequately address environmental considerations in priority fields to be funded. In a sample of (1) In 2002 the World Bank introduced a new two-dimensional coding system. 
Analysen av miljfrgor i landstrategidokumenten var i allmnhet bristfllig och kommissionens (1) Under 2002 infrde Vrldsbanken ett tvdimensionellt kodsystem. Varje ln frses med bde temakoder och sektorkoder.
The 11 theme codes correspond to the goals and objectives of Bank activities and the 12 sector codes indicate the parts of the economy that directly benefit from Bank support. 
De elva tema-koderna motsvarar mlen fr bankens verksamhet och de tolv sektor-koderna visar vilken ekonomisk sektor som direkt tar emot std frn banken.
60 CSPs, none of them mentioned the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) on environmental sustainability and only approximately a quarter made reference to Multilateral Environment Agreements (MEAs). 
I ett urval av 60 landstrategidokument nmndes inte millennieutvecklingsmlen om hllbar utveckling i ngot av dem och endast i ungefr en fjrdedel av dokumenten fanns det en hnvisning till internationella miljkonventioner.
To some degree the lack of environmental mainstreaming into CSPs reflected the limited priority attached to this issue by many beneficiary countries. 
Det faktum att miljaspekterna knappast integrerats i landstrategidokumenten speglar i viss grad att mnga mottagarlnder inte prioriterar denna frga.
For countries with a Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) (2), it has been the CommissionŐs policy to align its CSP to the PRSP. 
Fr de lnder som har ett strategidokument fr fattigdomsminskning (2) har kommissionens policy varit att anpassa landstrategidokumentet till strategidokumentet fr fattigdomsminskning.
As a World Bank study has shown (3), the environment has generally not been mainstreamed into PRSPs, partly because of a lack of recognition by many beneficiary countries of the important linkages between poverty and the environment. 
Som en underskning frn Vrldsbanken har visat (3) har miljaspekterna i allmnhet inte integrerats i strategidokumenten fr fattigdomsminskning, delvis fr att mnga mottagarlnder inte medger att det finns viktiga samband mellan fattigdom och milj.
Ministries of Environment should in the first place be the advocate of environmental issues in national policies but in practice these ministries, even in more developed countries with major environmental concerns such as Brazil and China, do not have the resources and influence of other, longer established ministries. 
Det viktigaste mlet fr miljministerier br vara att skydda miljn i den nationella politiken, men i praktiken har dessa ministerier ven i mer utvecklade lnder med stora miljproblem som Brasilien och Kina inte lika stora resurser och lika stort inflytande som andra ministerier som har funnits lngre.
Although the Commission Staff Working Paper on Mainstreaming the Environment stated that such Country Environment Profiles (CEPs) were an important tool for mainstreaming at the programming stage, a Commission review in 2002 covering a sample of 60 CSPs found that only six such CEPs had been drawn up. 
Trots att det i arbetsdokumentet frn kommissionens avdelningar om integrering av miljaspekterna str att miljprofiler fr varje land r ett viktigt verktyg fr integrering av miljn p programplaneringsstadiet, visade en granskning som kommissionen gjorde 2002, och som omfattade ett urval av 60 landstrategidokument, att endast sex sdana miljprofiler hade utarbetats.
This is despite the fact that such country environmental analysis has been best practice since 1992 when the OECD Development Assistance Committee issued guidelines on the subject (4). 
Detta trots att sdana landspecifika miljanalyser har varit bsta arbetsmetoder sedan 1992 nr OECD:s kommitt fr utvecklingsbistnd gav ut riktlinjer p detta omrde (4).
The Commission took an important step in 2005 to address this issue by establishing CEPs for Asian, Latin American and Mediterranean aid beneficiary countries as part of the process of preparing the next generation of Country Strategy Papers for the period 2007 to 2013. 
Kommissionen tog ett viktigt steg 2005 fr att hantera denna frga genom att den upprttade miljprofiler fr lnder i Asien, Latinamerika och Medelhavsomrdet som tar emot bistnd som ett led i arbetet med att utarbeta nsta generation strategidokument fr varje land fr perioden 2007Đ2013.
A similar approach is being followed for the ACP States. As the CSPs were still under preparation at the time the audit was completed, it was still too early to assess how far the CEPs had improved mainstreaming in the CSPs. 
Ett liknande tillvgagngsstt anvnds nu fr AVS-lnderna. Eftersom landstrategidokumenten fortfarande var under utarbetande nr granskningen avslutades var det fr tidigt att bedma i hur hg grad miljprofilerna hade medfrt en bttre integrering av miljaspekter i landstrategidokumenten.
This ultimately depends on how high a priority both the beneficiary countries and Commission services attach to addressing in the CSP the environmental issues raised by the CEPs. 
Detta beror i sista hand p hur hgt bde mottagarlnderna och kommissionen prioriterar de miljfrgor i landstrategidokumenten som tas upp i miljprofilerna fr varje land.
(2) Sincetheendofthe1990sdevelopingcountrieshaveestablishedPov-erty Reduction Strategy Papers to provide a framework for domestic policies and programmes, as well as for foreign assistance, with the overall aim of reducing poverty. 
(2) Sedan slutet av 1990-talet har utvecklingslnderna utarbetat strategidokument fr fattigdomsminskning som en ram dels fr den nationella politiken och nationella program, dels fr bistnd, med det vergripande syftet att minska fattigdomen.
(3) Status and evolution of environmental priorities in the poverty reduction strategies: an assessment of fifty poverty reduction papers. 
(3) Statusandevolutionofenvironmentalprioritiesinthepovertyreductionstra-tegies: an assessment of fifty poverty reduction papers (Lgesbeskrivning av miljprioriteringar i strategierna fr att bekmpa fattigdom).
Environment department papers, World Bank, November 2003. 
Dokument frn Vrldsbankens miljenhet, november 2003.
(4) OECD Development Assistance Committee. Guidelines on Aid and Environment. 
(4) Riktlinjer frn OECD:s kommitt fr utvecklingsbistnd om bistnd och milj.
29.9.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 235/11 34. 
29.9.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 235/11 34.
In this respect the Commission has made only limited progress in building up environmental awareness and mainstreaming capacity in beneficiary countries since the adoption of its own mainstreaming strategy. 
I detta avseende har kommissionen sedan den antog sin strategi fr integrering av miljaspekter endast gjort sm framsteg nr det gller att ka mottagarlndernas medvetenhet om miljn och kapacitet att integrera miljaspekter.
A specific instrument available to the Commission for promoting the integration of the environment into its development cooperation is Regulation (EC) No 2493/2000, which has a budget of 93 million euro over the period 2000 to 2006 (1). 
Ett srskilt instrument som kommissionen kan anvnda fr att frmja integrering av miljaspekterna i sitt utvecklingssamarbete r frordning (EG) nr 2493/2000, med en budget p 93 miljoner euro under perioden 2000Đ2006 (1).
This instrument could significantly help environmental capacity building in developing countries. 
Detta instrument hade dock endast ett begrnsat genomslag.
But the Commission has not established an overall approach to capacity building, and has only developed individual projects on an ad hoc basis. 
Det skulle ha kunnat bidra betydligt till att strka utvecklingslndernas miljkapacitet, men kommissionen har inte faststllt ngot vergripande arbetsstt fr kapacitetsuppbyggnad och har endast utvecklat enskilda projekt fr srskilda ndaml.
On the Commission side, it is of concern that only limited use was made in 2005 by officials responsible for CSP preparation of the opportunities for training in environmental mainstreaming (see Box 4). 
Nr det gller kommissionen r det oroande att de tjnstemn som ansvarade fr att utarbeta landstrategidokumenten endast i begrnsad utstrckning deltog i de fortbildningstillfllen som erbjds under 2005 avseende integrering av miljaspekter (se ruta 4).