natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
PROCEDURES FOR VERIFYING ADDITIONALITY 7. 
F RFARANDEN F R ATT KONTROLLERA ADDITIONALITETEN 7.
The aim has been to avoid disproportionate administrative burdens by striking a balance between the need for equal treatment and the need for flexibility to take account of the specific circumstances of the different Objectives, Member States and regions. 
Mlet fr dessa kontakter har varit att undvika orimliga administrationskostnader genom att finna en jmvikt mellan behovet av likabehandling och den flexibilitet som krvs fr att anpassa kontrollerna till srdragen hos varje ml, medlemsstat och region.
General information explaining the common procedures and methodology for the verification of additionality for all Objectives was submitted to the Member States by letter of 6 August 1990 from the Secretariat-General and for Objective 1 by letter of 30 March 1993 from DG XVI. 
Vad gller frfaranden och metoder fr kontroll av additionaliteten som r gemensamma fr samtliga ml versnde kommissionens generalsekretariat information till medlemsstaterna i en skrivelse av den 6 augusti 1990. Motsvarande uppgifter fr ml 1 sndes till medlemsstaterna av GD XVI den 30 mars 1993.
Information on the verification of additionality for Objective 1 in the period 2000 to 2006 was sent to Member States in August 1999. 
Fr kontroll av additionaliteten under perioden 2000Đ2006 skickades information ut till medlemsstaterna i augusti 1999.
The preparation of financial information necessary for the verification of additionality and its submission to the Commission is the responsibility of the Member States. 
Det r medlemsstaterna som ansvarar fr att ta fram och meddela kommissionen de finansiella data som behvs fr att kontrollera additionaliteten.
The Commission recognises that certain Member States have difficulties in applying the system and has sought to take account of such difficulties, notably on the basis of experience during the previous programming period. 
Kommissionen medger att vissa av medlemsstaterna har svrigheter att tillmpa detta system, och har frskt ta hnsyn till dessa svrigheter, srskilt med hjlp av erfarenheterna frn fregende programperiod.
In the case of Objectives 2 and 5b, where the available information was considered inadequate to establish an ex ante verification, Ôsuspensive clausesŐ were introduced in the programming documents. 
Nr det gller ml 2 och ml 5b, dr den tillgngliga informationen inte bedmdes vara tillrcklig fr att gra frhandskontroller, infrdes en Óklausul om tillfllig indragningÓ i programdokumenten.
C 68/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 9.3.2000 9. 
C 68/20 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 9.3.2000 9.
With regard to ongoing monitoring of the verification of additionality, this takes place on the basis of financial information prepared by the Member States and submitted to the Commission following the same presentation as used for the ex ante evaluation. 
Det pgende arbetet med att vervaka hur kontrollen av additionaliteten fungerar bygger p finansiella uppgifter som sammanstlls av medlemsstaterna och snds in till kommissionen i samma form som vid frhandsutvrderingarna.
With regard to the procedure to be adopted when compliance with additionality is in doubt, it is necessary to recognise that the statutory provisions provide the Commission with very few powers to deal with the matter. 
I frgan om vad som skall ske nr det finns tvivel om huruvida additionalitetsprincipen uppfylls br det ppekas att gllande regler ger kommissionen mycket begrnsade befogenheter.
IMPLEMENTATION AT THE COMMISSION Allocation of responsibility for verification 12. 
TILLMPNING INOM KOMMISSIONEN Frdelning av kontrollansvar 12.
Similar to DG XVI, DG VI asked DG II for its assistance in the analysis of information submitted by Member States. 
GD VI har, liksom GD XVI, bett GD II om hjlp med analysen av de uppgifter som lagts fram av medlemsstaterna.
This does not imply that DG VI considered DG II to have full responsibility for the verification of additionality. 15. 
Detta innebr dock inte att GD VI ansg att GD II skulle bra det fulla ansvaret fr att kontrollera additionaliteten.
While it is true that responsibility for additionality in DG XVI is divided between a horizontal unit and the geographical units, with the involvement also of DG II, the system in general operates satisfactorily. 
15. ven om det r riktigt att kontrollansvaret inom GD XVI r delat mellan en vergripande ÓhorisontellÓ enhet och de enheter som ansvarar fr olika geografiska omrden, ven hr med medverkan frn GD II, fungerar ansvarsfrdelningen i regel tillfredsstllande.
In this regard, it is necessary in particular to take account of frequent day-to-day contacts between the officials concerned. 
De dagliga kontakterna mellan de tjnstemn som arbetar med frgorna r naturligtvis ett viktigt skl till detta.
The audit performed by DG V was useful and resulted in improvements in the reporting of additionality data from the Member States. 
Den granskning som genomfrdes av GD V var till stor nytta och ledde till frbttringar av de uppgifter som snds in av medlemsstaterna som underlag fr att bedma additionaliteten.
In those Member States where no firm conclusions could be drawn due to lack of information, an effort was made by the operational units concerned to collect the necessary data and to complete the exercise as far as possible. 
I de medlemsstater dr inga klara slutsatser kunde dras p grund av bristande underlag gjorde de enheter som ansvarar fr det operativa arbetet en extra insats fr att f fram de aktuella uppgifterna och genomfra arbetet s snart som mjligt.
The Commission agrees that the information received from the Member States on additionality should be examined in depth. 
Kommissionen hller med om att de uppgifter som kommer in frn medlemsstaterna br underskas noggrant.
Suspensive clauses 18 to 19. In order not to delay the adoption of programmes for Objectives 2 and 5b due to the absence of technical information on additionality which is often difficult to prepare, the services had recourse to the use of Ôsuspensive clausesŐ. 
Fr att inte behva frsena antagandet av programmen inom ml 2 och 5b som helhet p grund av bristen p tekniska uppgifter till grund fr kontrollen av additionaliteten Đ uppgifter som ofta kan vara komplicerade att sammanstlla Đ gavs de berrda avdelningarna rtt att anvnda sig av Óklausuler om tillfllig indragningÓ.
The intention was to provide the Member States with some extra flexibility in regard to the provision of information rather than proceed with a formal suspension of payments under the relevant provision of the Regulation. 
Tanken med detta var att ge medlemsstaterna en viss flexibilitet i frga om tillhandahllandet av dessa uppgifter i stllet fr att inleda en procedur fr att formellt dra in betalningarna enligt den relevanta artikeln i frordningen.
The Commission agrees that, once a Ôsuspensive clauseŐ is included in a programming document, it covers all the Funds concerned. Therefore, it is acknowledged that no further payments should be made in such cases prior to the removal of the clauses. 
Kommissionen delar uppfattningen att om en klausul om tillfllig indragning har frts in i ett programdokument s skall denna tillmpas fr alla de berrda fonderna, och att sledes inga utbetalningar skall ske frrn en eventuell tillfllig indragning hvts.
As is pointed out by the Court, a number of payments were undertaken while Ôsuspensive clausesŐ were still in force, although in some cases only shortly before their formal removal. 
Som revisionsrtten ppekar har trots allt ett antal utbetalningar verkstllts medan de aktuella stden i sjlva verket var tillflligt indragna, ven om det i ngra av dessa fall skedde alldeles innan indragningen hvdes.
Methodological issues are often discussed in informal technical meetings of the persons in charge before or after the Monitoring Committee meetings. 
Metodfrgorna diskuteras ofta vid informella ÓtekniskaÓ mten som hlls av dem som ansvarar fr dessa aspekter, i regel kort fre eller efter sjlva kom-mittmtena.
There is no particular requirement for the Commission to publish regular information on additionality. 
Det finns idag inget specifikt krav p att kommissionen regelbundet skall offentliggra uppgifter om hur additionalitetsprincipen fljs.
In addition, part of the information submitted by the Member States is of a confidential nature and inappropriate for publication. 
Dessutom r en del av de uppgifter som snds in av medlemsstaterna konfidentiella, och sledes inte lmpade fr publicering.
9.3.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 68/21 The 1989 to 1993 period 24. 
9.3.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 68/21 Perioden 1989Đ1993 24.
The audit referred to by the Court was indeed concluded but, due to lack of information from the Member States, no follow-up was carried out (see response to paragraph 16). 
Den granskning som revisionsrtten hnvisar till fullbordades i sjlva verket, men ledde inte till ngon uppfljning eftersom uppgifter frn medlemsstaterna saknades (se kommissionens kommentar under punkt 16).
The Commission wishes to underline that there was in fact an intensive process of information, discussion and negotiation between Commission and Member States regarding the ex ante evaluation of additionality for the programming period 1994 to 1999. 
Kommissionen vill understryka att frgan om frhandsutvrdering av additionaliteten under perioden 1994Đ1999 faktiskt varit freml fr omfattande informationsutbyte, diskussioner och frhandlingar mellan kommissionen och medlemsstaterna.
Firstly, they ignore the significant differences between Member StatesŐ expenditure in Objective 1 regions regarding political priorities, organisation and the relative importance of the Structural Funds. 
Dels speglar tabellerna inte de betydande skillnader som finns mellan de olika medlemsstaternas utgifter i ml 1-regioner, vad gller svl politiska prioriteringar som organisation och strukturfondsmedlens relativa betydelse.
Secondly, they do not take into account the fact that the Commission has never encouraged Member States to include 100 % of their development-related expenditure in the additionality table, which would have meant an excessive administrative burden. 
Dels framgr det inte av tabellerna att kommissionen aldrig har uppmuntrat medlemsstaterna att ta upp 100 % av sina utgifter fr regional utveckling i additionalitetstabellerna Đ en praxis som skulle ha medfrt orimliga administrativa kostnader.
The CommissionŐs priority has been to have as many identical expenditure categories as possible in the current and reference additionality tables, which may require the exclusion of some expenditure. 32 to 35. 
Kommissionens frmsta prioritet har varit att ta med s mnga identiska utgiftskategorier som mjligt i additionalitetstabellerna (svl aktuella tabeller som referenstabeller), vilket kan innebra att vissa utgifter mste utelmnas.
This situation is clearly linked to the relatively heavy administrative burden of the present system of verification and will undoubtedly be improved by the considerable simplification of the system introduced for the next programming period. 
Detta beror till stor del p den betydande belastning p administrationen som det nuvarande kontrollsystemet utgr, och kommer definitivt att frbttras i och med det frenklade system som skall tillmpas under den nya programperioden.
The indicator of gross-fixed capital formation (GFCF) of the general government as calculated by the system of economic accounts differs from the indicator of eligible expenditure as used for additionality which limits the value of comparisons between the two indicators. 
Indikatorn fr den offentliga sektorns bruttoinvesteringar ssom den berknas enligt rkenskapssystemet avviker frn den indikator fr stdberttigande utgifter som ligger till grund fr berkningarna om additionalitet, och det r drfr svrt att dra klara slutsatser av jmfrelser mellan de bda indikatorerna.
In the next programming period the verification of additionality for Objectives 2 and 3 taken together will be based on expenditure on active labour market policy and, where justified, other actions in accordance with the new Regulation on the Structural Funds (Article 11). 
Under nsta programperiod kommer kontrollen av additionalitet inom ml 2 och 3 (sammantagna) att grundas p utgifterna fr aktiv arbetsmarknadspolitik och, om s r befogat, andra tgrder som omfattas av artikel 11 i den nya strukturfondsfrordningen.
However, the verification will continue to be based on information submitted by Member States. 
Kontrollen kommer emellertid ven fortsttningsvis att bygga p de uppgifter som lggs fram av medlemsstaterna.
The Commission agrees that the verification of additionality should be as clear, operational and simple as possible. 
Kommissionen delar uppfattningen att kontrollen av additionaliteten br fungera p ett s tydligt, enkelt och praktiskt stt som mjligt.
In its relations with the Member States the Commission has therefore sought to be pragmatic to arrive at acceptable yet workable solutions adapted to their specific situations, within a well-defined framework of minimum methodological requirements. 
I kontakterna med medlemsstaterna har kommissionen sledes strvat efter lsningar som bde r godtagbara och praktiskt genomfrbara och som kan anpassas till specifika situationer, utifrn vl definierade minimikrav i frga om metodik.
For the future, the verification of additionality will be facilitated by the considerable simplification of the system introduced in the new Regulations. Overlapping of periods 51 to 57. 
I framtiden br kontrollerna underlttas vsentligt med hjlp av det frenklade system som infrs genom de nya frordningarna. verlappning av perioder 51Đ57.
The Commission would like to recall that additionality relates only to the spending of the Member State, and entirely excludes the contribution of the Structural Funds. 
Kommissionen vill i detta sammanhang understryka att principen om additionalitet endast tillmpas p de nationella offentliga utgifterna och inte p strukturfondsutgifterna som sdana.
In practice the overlap of spending between programming periods does not significantly affect the assessment of additionality and only does so to the extent that the time profile of Structural FundsŐ spending has an impact on the time profile of a Member StateŐs own expenditure. 
I praktiken pverkar denna verlappning av utgifter mellan olika programperioder inte bedmningen av additionaliteten p ngot betydande stt. Den enda pverkan freligger i de fall frdelningen ver tiden av struk-turfondsutbetalningarna i ngon mn styr medlemsstatens egen utgiftsprofil.
For most Member States, the time profile of Structural Funds spending can be expected to only have a marginal effect. 
I de flesta medlemsstater har strukturfondsutbetal-ningarnas frdelning ver tiden endast en marginell effekt.
C 68/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 9.3.2000 Starting point and comparability of data ticular, between Objective 1, which accounts for 70 % of Structural FundsŐ spending, and the remaining Objectives. 
C 68/22 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 9.3.2000 Utgngslge och uppgifternas jmfrbarhet 58Đ59.
In application of the principle of proportionality, the Commission has been much more rigid in assessing additionality for Objective 1 and somewhat more flexible for the other Objectives, in order to avoid imposing a disproportionate administrative burden on national and regional authorities which have to overcome major problems of data availability. 
I linje med principen om proportionalitet har kommissionen bedmt additionaliteten betydligt mer strikt inom ml 1 och mer flexibelt inom de andra mlen, det sistnmnda fr att undvika att lgga en orimlig administrativ brda p de nationella och regionala myndigheter som mste tampas med problemen med att f fram svrtillgngliga data.
In this regard, the Commission notes that the greater number of difficulties identified in the present report concerns non-Objective 1 regions. 
I detta sammanhang noterar kommissionen att de flesta av de svrigheter som belyses i revisionsrttens rapport gller andra regioner n ml 1-regioner.
The Commission agrees that the instruments available to sanction non-compliance with the principle of additionality, i.e. information to the public and the suspension of payments, are insufficient. The Commission regrets that its initial proposal in the new general Structural Funds Regulation to introduce a workable sanctioning mechanism by linking the verification of additionality to the allocation of the performance reserve has been rejected by Member States, which are at the same time both legislator and party to the verification of additionality. 
Kommissionen delar ocks uppfattningen att de sanktioner som idag kan tillmpas i fall dr additionalitetsprincipen inte efterlevs Đ information till allmnheten samt tillfllig indragning av utbetalningar Đ r otillrckliga, och beklagar att dess frslag om att infra ett anvndbart sanktionssystem i den nya allmnna strukturfondsfrordningen avvisades av medlemsstaterna, som ju i det hr fallet samtidigt r lagstiftare och parter i fall som rr kontroll av additionaliteten.
In view of the impossibility of taking into account all public eligible expenditure, the Commission and Member States have to be pragmatic in order to arrive at acceptable yet workable solutions adapted to specific situations within a well-defined framework of minimum methodological requirements. 
Eftersom det r omjligt att ta med alla offentliga utgifter i berkningen mste kommissionen och medlemsstaterna anta en pragmatisk hllning och strva efter godtagbara och praktiskt genomfrbara lsningar som r anpassade till varje situation, inom ramen fr vl definierade minimiregler.
The Commission has never urged Member States to include 100 % of their development-related expenditure in the additionality table, which would have meant an excessive administrative burden, but to have as many identical expenditure categories as possible in the current additionality table and the reference table. 
Kommissionen har aldrig frskt tvinga medlemsstaterna att redovisa 100 % av sina utvecklingsutgifter i additionalitetstabellerna, eftersom detta skulle ha lett till orimliga administrativa kostnader. I stllet har medlemsstaterna uppmanats att ta med s mnga identiska utgiftskategorier som mjligt i de aktuella additionalitetstabellerna och referenstabellerna.
The Commission agrees that the verification of additionality is much easier in Member States totally eligible for Objective 1 assistance, which receive the major part of Structural Funds. 
Kommissionen hller med revisionsrtten i bedmningen att det r lttare att kontrollera additionaliteten i medlemsstater som r i sin helhet stdberttigade enligt ml 1, som ju r det ml som omfattar den strre delen av strukturfondsanslagen.
In the forthcoming programming period, these problems will be reduced considerably by the new concept for the verification of additionality for Objectives 2 and 3 together. 
Under den kommande programperioden kommer dessa problem att minska betydligt p grund av det nya systemet fr gemensam kontroll av additionaliteten fr ml 2 och 3.
Regarding the integration of additionality with the monitoring and evaluation systems, the Commission would underline the frequent contacts between the officials of the different Commission services and between officials of the Commission services and the national authorities in the context of Monitoring Committee meetings. 
I frgan om att infoga additionalitetsaspekten i vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemen betonar kommissionen att tta kontakter hllits mellan kommissionens olika avdelningar och mellan kommissionen och de nationella myndigheterna i samband med vervakningskommitternas mten.
The Commission agrees that there is room for improvement in the coordination of the actions of the different services of the Commission dealing with additionality and steps have already been taken to that end. 
Kommissionen hller med om att samordningen mellan kommissionens olika avdelningar kan frbttras nr det gller bedmning av additionaliteten, och vissa steg har redan vidtagits fr att uppn detta ml.
At the same time, it must be acknowledged that there will always be some difficulties in circumstances where the organisational structure of the Commission obliges several services to deal with different aspects of the same matter, a situation that is certainly not unique to additionality. 
Man mste samtidigt inse att det aldrig helt gr att undvika problem i situationer dr kommissionens organisatoriska uppbyggnad gr att olika aspekter av samma rende med ndvndighet handlggs av flera olika avdelningar Đ situationer som frvisso kan uppkomma ven p mnga andra omrden.
9.3.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 68/23 74. 
9.3.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 68/23 74.
There is certainly a general need for better regional information and statistics. 
Generellt sett finns det ett behov av bttre information och statistik p regional niv.
The situation will improve in the coming years through the new European system of integrated accounts (ESA 95) which obliges Member States to provide improved and extended regional economic statistics. 
Under de kommande ren frvntas situationen frbttras en hel del p grund av det nya Europeiska nationalrkenskapssystemet (ENS 95), enligt vilket medlemsstaterna lggs att lgga fram utvidgad och frbttrad regional ekonomisk statistik.
Regarding additionality, the need for regional data will be reduced considerably in the next programming period by the change of concept for the verification of additionality for Objectives 2 and 3 together. 
I frga om bedmning av additionaliteten kommer behoven av statistik p regional niv att minska vsentligt under den kommande programperioden p grund av det nya systemet fr bedmning av ml 2 och 3 tillsammans.
In the CommissionŐs view, the modalities for the verification of additionality in the forthcoming programming period as introduced in the new Regulation will be more simple, concrete and operational. 
Enligt kommissionens bedmning kommer metoderna fr att kontrollera additionaliteten under den kommande programperioden att bli svl enklare som mer praktiska och konkreta.
Article 11 of the new general Regulation and the information provided to Member States in August 1999 respond to many of the points raised by the Court. 
Mnga av de problem som revisionsrtten tar upp br kunna lsas med hjlp av artikel 11 i den nya allmnna strukturfondsfrordningen och genom den information som sndes ut till medlemsstaterna i augusti 1999.
The frequency of verifications is reduced to a total number of three (ex ante, mid-term and at the end of the period), the verification of additionality for Objectives 2 and 3 will take place at the national level on the basis of expenditure on active labour market policies, the derogations apply only to the determination of the reference level ex ante, failure to submit satisfactory information on additionality ex ante will lead to a delay in the approval of programming decisions. 
Kontrollfrekvensen kommer att minska och det totala antalet kontroller blir nu tre (frhandskon-troll, kontroll efter halva tiden och i slutet av perioden), kontrollen av additionaliteten inom ml 2 och 3 kommer att ske p nationell niv p grundval av utgifterna fr aktiv arbetsmarknadspolitik, undantagen kommer bara att tillmpas vid frhandsbedmningen av referensnivn, och underltenhet att redovisa uppgifter fr frhandsbedmningen av additionaliteten kommer att leda till frsenat godknnande av programbesluten.