natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
555 350 239 7 1 151 177 1 328 Financial implementation by type of FAIR programme projects Types of projects Value (in million ECU) Number of contracts Implementation as at 31.12.1998 Shared-cost projects 438,5 38,6 5,1 0,9 450 114 6 2 256 323 177 1 328 - of which specific TSE calls - of which joint TSE calls Concerted actions - of which TSE Demonstration projects Thematic networks 8,8 2,1 0,6 8 1 1 177 28 SMEs 34,5 - feasibility awards 6,7 - cooperative research 27,9 Grants 26,4 Supporting measures 21,0 Total 565,0 Source: Commission data as at 11.6.1999. 
Typ av projekt Projekt med kostnadsdelning - varav srskild TSE-anbudsinfordran - varav gemensamma TSE-anbudsinfordringar Samordnade tgrder - varav TSE Demonstrationsprojekt Temainriktade nt Sm och medelstora fretag - std till genomfrbarhetsunderskningar - forskningssamarbete Belopp (miljoner ecu) Antal avtal Budgetgenomfrande per typ av projekt inom FAIR-programmet Genomfrande per 31.12.1998 8,8 2,1 0,6 6,7 27,9 438,5 38,6 5,1 0,9 34,5 8 1 1 177 28 450 114 6 2 256 323 177 Stipendier 26,4 Kompletterande tgrder 21,0 Totalt 565,0 Klla: Uppgifter frn kommissionen per 11.6.1999. 1 328
30.3.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 92/7 Implementation framework 21. 
30.3.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 92/7 Frutsttningarna vid genomfrandet 21.
The weaknesses described in the paragraphs below are the result of certain features specific to the FAIR programme, as well as of lack of precision in the regulatory framework and management structure. 
De svagheter som beskrivs i punkterna nedan r resultatet av vissa egenskaper som r specifika fr FAIR-programmet samt av bristande precision i lagstiftningsramen och frvaltningsstruktu-ren.
Definitions and rules Strategy and objectives 22. 
Definitioner och bestmmelser Strategi och ml 22.
The FAIR programme fits in with the research strategy laid down for the fourth FP: it reflects its guidelines and specifies its scientific and technological objectives in the field of agriculture and fisheries. 
FAIR-programmet ingr i den forskningsstrategi som faststllts fr fjrde ramprogrammet. Det terspeglar ramprogrammets riktlinjer och definierar dess vetenskapliga och tekniska ml inom jordbruk och fiske.
The economic sectors involved, the strategic and general objectives targeted, and the methods proposed for meeting them are thus set out in its first Annex. 
I den frsta bilagan framlggs ven vilka ekonomiska sektorer som berrs. Man presenterar de strategiska och allmnna mlen samt medlen att uppn dem.
The description of the objectives would have benefited from being accompanied by quantitative indicators. 
Beskrivningen av mlen kunde med frdel ha tfljts av kvantitativa indikatorer.
It would similarly have been useful to place greater emphasis on the link with the outcome of previous Community research. Types of activities 23. 
Det skulle ven ha varit skl att fsta strre tonvikt vid resultaten frn tidigare gemenskapsforskning. tgrdstyper 23.
In accordance with the specific rules laid down in Annex III to the FAIR programme, the latter is based on a broad range of measures. 
I enlighet med de bestmmelser som faststlls i bilaga III till FAIR-programmet baserar det sig p ett stort antal tgrder.
Although 84 % of the appropriations continue to be devoted to shared-cost research projects, 16 % are set aside for less traditional measures. 
Trots att 84 % av anslagen fortfarande r avsatta fr forskningsprojekt med kostnadsdelning avstts 16 % fr mindre traditionella tgrder.
The latter include, more particularly, researchersŐ training and mobility grants and measures to promote SMEs. 
Bland de senare terfinns stipendier fr fortbildning och rrlighet fr forskare och tgrder fr frmjande av sm och medelstora fretag.
These thematic measures, which had already been tested under other specific programmes or the previous programme, but on a small scale, were not new. 
Dessa temainriktade tgrder som i mindre skala redan testats i andra srskilda program eller i det fregende programmet, r inte nya.
For the Commission, integrating the thematic measures into the existing decision-making and implementation procedure has, nevertheless, created considerable extra work because of their particular rules and the fact that the management of these measures is shared by several departments. 
Fr kommissionen har integrationen av dem i det befintliga frfarandet fr beslutsfattande och genomfrande icke desto mindre inneburit stor arbetsbelastning till fljd av de srskilda regler som gller fr dessa tgrder och det faktum att frvaltningen av dem delas mellan flera avdelningar.
The sum of the training and mobility grants awarded under the FAIR programme accounted for a total Community contribution of ECU 26,4 million in respect of 323 contracts at the end of December 1998. 
De stipendier som inom FAIR-programmet beviljats fr fortbildning och rrlighet stod i december 1998 fr ett gemenskapsbidrag p 26,4 miljoner ecu fr 323 avtal.
They are all processed in a standard manner, as laid down in the specific ÔResearchersŐ training and mobilityŐ programme. 
De behandlas alla p ett likvrdigt stt s som faststlls i det srskilda programmet ÓUtbildning och fri rrlighet fr forskareÓ.
Beneficiaries also have to cope with a selection, evaluation and decision-making mechanism that is incompatible with the rapid processing of applications. 
Stdmottagarna stlls ven infr ett frfarande fr urval, utvrdering och beslut som inte r lmpat fr en snabb behandling av anskningar.
The value of this measure within the programme is moreover difficult to measure when beneficiaries are not followed up on a regular basis, once the training contract has ended, given that the most recent details concerning their situation are already historic. 
Nyttan av denna tgrd inom programmet r dessutom svr att mta i avsaknad av en regelbunden vervakning av stdmottagarna efter att avtalet om fortbildning utgtt, eftersom de senaste knda uppgifterna om dessa redan r gamla.
A specific provision should be laid down in the contract so that the risk of repeat financing of study subjects previously financed by Community funds is avoided. 
Fr att undvika risken fr dubbel finansiering av forskningsomrden som tidigare finansierats med gemenskapsmedel br en srskild bestmmelse om detta inskrivas i avtalet.
The scientific, administrative and financial management of the measures to promote SMEs is itself complex, owing to the specific nature of the related rules of application and the particular attention that needs to be paid to beneficiaries. 
Den vetenskapliga, administrativa och ekonomiska frvaltningen av tgrder fr frmjande av sm och medelstora fretag r fr sin del komplex p grund av de specifika genomfrandebestmmelserna  ena sidan och den srskilda uppmrksamhet som stdmottagarna krver  andra sidan.
During the course of the programme, the DG for Science, Research and DevelopmentŐs Unit for the Coordination of SMEs had to make belated adjustments (in April 1998). 
Detta har under programmets gng lett till frseningar vid uppdateringarna (i april 1998) vid enheten ÓSamordning av frgor rrande sm och medelstora fretagÓ inom generaldirektoratet ÓVetenskap, forskning och utvecklingÓ.
Despite the efforts made and the support activities undertaken under the FAIR programme, notably by establishing special information networks, only 5,5 % of the appropriations were used, instead of the 10 % maximum laid down by the Council Decision adopting the FAIR programme. 
Trots de anstrngningar som gjorts och de stdtgrder som vidtagits inom FAIR-programmet, bland annat genom inrttande av srskilda informationsnt, utnyttjades endast 5,5 % av anslagen i stllet fr den maximiandel p 10 % som rdet faststllt i sitt beslut om godknnande av FAIR-programmet.
In order to promote dissemination, the Commission took the initiative of financing the FAIR network activities or focal points, which were aimed more particularly at providing information to SMEs in the agro-industrial sector. 
Fr att frmja spridningen av denna tgrd tog kommissionen initiativet att finansiera verksamheten inom nten eller FAIR-kontaktpunkterna, som nrmare bestmt var mnade att informera sm och medelstora fretag inom den agroindustriella sektorn.
At the end of the programme, 34 projects had received a total subsidy of ECU 1,2 million. 
Vid utgngen av programmet hade 34 projekt erhllit std till ett sammanlagt belopp p 1,2 miljoner ecu.
The subsidies were also granted on the basis of a contract that did not formally incorporate the content and terms governing the implementation of the work financed. 
Dessutom beviljades stdet p basis av ett avtal som inte formellt tog upp innehllet i och genomfrandevillkoren fr det arbete som finansierades.
Selection criteria and financial contribution 27. 
Urvalskriterier och finansiellt deltagande 27.
The selection criteria and financial-contribution rules selected under the FAIR programme are based on rules common to RTD activities, which are laid down in the fourth FP and the related Council Decisions (1). 
Urvalskriterierna och bestmmelserna om finansiellt deltagande i FAIR-programmet stder sig p de gemensamma reglerna om FoTU-verksamhet som definieras i fjrde ramprogrammet och rdets beslut i anslutning till detta (1).
As the Council Decision adopting the programme did not lay down distinctive criteria, the FAIR research projects had to be selected on the basis of their scientific and technical qualities. 
Eftersom rdets beslut om programmet inte faststllde ngra exakta kriterier var man tvungen att vlja forskningsprojekt inom FAIR p basis av deras vetenskapliga och tekniska vrde.
In some areas, however, particularly in area 4 for ÔAgriculture, forestry and rural developmentŐ, which links research with CAP and rural-development requirements, additional selection criteria were applied. 
Inom vissa omrden, srskilt inom omrde 4, ÓJordbruk, skogsbruk och landsbygdsutvecklingÓ, som sammanlnkar forskning med GJP:s och landsbygdsutvecklingens behov, anvndes dock ytterligare urvalskriterier.
As far as the abovementioned area is concerned, these criteria, such as the priority given to agricultural-policy aspects in the selection procedure, were not clarified beforehand. 
Vad gller detta omrde klargjordes dessa kriterier, t.ex. prioritering av jordbrukspolitiska aspekter vid urvalsfrfarandet, inte p frhand.
When the first call was issued, they were poorly understood by the potential beneficiaries of the research measures. 
Vid den frsta anbudsinfordran frstods dessa dligt av de potentiella mottagarna av std fr forskningsverksamhet.
The global control of the proposals submitted in response to the first call revealed that, after the proposals had been evaluated, 13 projects that had been rated scientifically excellent by independent experts and 47 very good proposals awarded marks of A+ (1) Council Decision 94/762/EC of 21 November 1994 concerning the rules for the dissemination of the research results from the specific programmes of research, technological development and demonstration of the European Community, OJ L 306, 30.11.1994, and Council Decision 94/763/EC of 21 November 1994 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in research, technological development and demonstration activities of the European Community, OJ L 306, 30.11.1994. 
Den motivering som gavs var att projekten inte motsvarade bedmningskriterierna fr omrde 4 betrffande, (1) Rdets beslut 94/762/EG av den 21 november 1994 om regler fr spridning av forskningsresultat frn Europeiska gemenskapens srskilda program fr forskning, teknisk utveckling och demonstration, EGT L 306, 30.11.1994 och rdets beslut 94/763/EG av den 21 november 1994 om regler fr fretags, forskningscentrers och universitets deltagande i Europeiska gemenskapens verksamhet inom forskning, teknisk utveckling och demonstration, EGT L 306, 30.11.1994.
C 92/8 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30.3.2000 and A respectively were not selected for inclusion in the list of activities to be financed. 
C 92/8 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 30.3.2000 bland annat, projektens verensstmmelse med GJP:s ml.
The Commission was, however, prevailed upon to review its list of projects in order to comply more strictly with the selection rules agreed for the programme. 
Kommissionen frmddes emellertid omprva sin frteckning ver projekt fr att mera strikt iaktta de verenskomna urvalsreglerna fr programmet.
For example, 10 proposals that had been awarded a B by the experts and were selected because of the benefits they offered in respect of CAP objectives were replaced by projects of a higher scientific quality. 
P s stt ersattes tio projekt som experterna hade givit bedmningen B och som hade valts p grund av att de var av intresse betrffande GJP:s ml av projekt vars vetenskapliga kvalitet var hgre.
This readjustment of the selection criteria in favour of the projectsŐ higher scientific and technical quality was only partial, however: an examination of the CommissionŐs review revealed that the 10 B proposals rejected had all been transferred to a reserve list, and five of them were financed in the end. 
Denna justering av urvalskriterierna till frmn fr projekt av hgre vetenskaplig och teknisk kvalitet genomfrdes endast delvis: en underskning av kommissionens omprvning visar att alla tio ÓB-frslagÓ flyttades till reservlistan och att fem av dem slutligen finansierades.
Where appropriate provisions authorise the use of selection criteria other than the traditional ones of scientific and technical excellence, prior explanations concerning their nature, import and combination are essential. 
Nr bestmmelserna ger mjlighet till utnyttjande av andra urvalskriterier n de traditionella kriterierna fr vetenskapligt och tekniskt vrde, r det ndvndigt med frhandsredogrelser om deras karaktr, betydelse och sammansttning.
Other general provisions of the fourth FP or of the abovementioned Council Decisions were unclear. 
Andra allmnna bestmmelser i fjrde ramprogrammet eller ovannmnda rdets beslut r inte tillrckligt tydliga.
For example, Community financing of RTD projects has rarely been decreased in proportion to the proximity to the market. 
Till exempel har gemenskapsfinansieringen av FoTU-projekt sllan snkts i frhllande till nrheten till marknaden.
The Commission failed to define either the rules for application or the terms for fixing the corresponding sliding-scale rates. 
Kommissionen hade inte definierat genomfrandebestmmelser eller villkor fr faststllande av motsvarande stegvis sjunkande procentsatser.
Procedures Programme evaluation 31. 
Frfaranden Bedmning av programmen 31.
In order to meet the obligations arising from the fourth FP and specific programmes, in 1995 the Commission introduced a new approach to following up and evaluating Community research activities which involved two separate procedures: annual follow-up and five-year evaluation of research programmes. 
Fr att uppfylla de skyldigheter som hrrr frn fjrde ramprogrammet och de srskilda programmen infrde kommissionen r 1995 ett nytt tillvgagngsstt fr vervakning och utvrdering av gemenskapens forskningsverksamhet. Detta omfattade tv separata frfaranden, en rlig uppfljning och en utvrdering av forskningsprogrammen vart femte r.
The five-year evaluation is a three-fold exercise which involves incorporating the final evaluation of the previous FP, evaluating all specific programmes under way and carrying out an ex ante evaluation in preparation for the next FP. 
Utvrderingen vart femte r r ett frfarande i tre delar som bestr av en slutlig utvrdering av det gllande ramprogrammet, en utvrdering av alla pgende srskilda program och en preliminr frhandsbedmning av fljande ramprogram.
Within this approach, however, the scope and content of the final evaluations, as described in the specific programmesŐ legal provisions, are not specified. 
Inom detta frfarande preciseras emellertid inte de slutliga utvrderingarnas rckvidd och innehll p det stt som anges i de rttsliga bestmmelserna om de srskilda programmen.
The final evaluation exercise has not been actually been carried in the case of some specific programmes. 
I praktiken har den slutliga utvrderingen inte utfrts fr vissa srskilda program.
33. Although the specific agricultural research programmes under the second FP have come to an end, the Commission has not yet adopted the provisions needed to carry out the final evaluation of three of them (1). 
33. ven om de srskilda programmen fr jordbruksforskning inom andra ramprogrammet avslutats, har kommissionen nnu inte utfrdat de bestmmelser som krvs fr att genomfra den slutliga utvrderingen betrffande tre av dessa (1).
To date it has merely referred back to the reports concerning the most recent five-year evaluation of the research programmes, for which the objective of the evaluation exercise is different. 
Till dags dato har kommissionen endast hnvisat till de rapporter som gller den senaste femrsutvrderingen av forskningsprogrammen, vars syfte emellertid inte r det samma.
The report on the evaluation of the specific programmes of agricultural research measures has produced few developments as regards the real nature of the final evaluation of completed programmes, even though it proposed to incorporate this aspect. 
Rapporten om utvrdering av de srskilda programmen fr tgrder inom jordbruksforskning som framlades under samma tidsperiod har inte betytt mycket fr utformningen av den slutliga utvrderingen av avslutade program, trots att den skulle omfatta ven denna aspekt.
The report on framework programmes, drawn up in February 1997 by the group of experts appointed by the Commission, states that Ôgiven the time available, the group decided to concentrate essentially on the future, rather than linger over the pastŐ. 
I denna rapport om ramprogrammen som den av kommissionen utnmnda expertgruppen inlmnade i februari 1997 konstateras emellertid att gruppen med tanke p tidsramen beslutat koncentrera sig p framtiden snarare n att uppehlla sig vid det frflutna.
Up until July 1997, when the Commission published a call for applications (2) in order to draw up a list of experts, the criteria for selecting expert programme assessors had not been specified clearly. 
Fram till juli 1997, d kommissionen offentliggjorde en ansk-ningsinfordran (2) fr att uppfra en frteckning ver experter, var kriterierna fr urval av experter fr bedmning av program inte klart specificerade.
In the absence of provision to the contrary, the selection of an expert who had sat or was sitting on the FAIR Programme Committee (see paragraph 69) was not precluded. 
Eftersom det inte fanns ngra bestmmelser om motsatsen var det inte uteslutet att vlja en expert som deltog eller hade deltagit i FAIR:s programkommitt (se punkt 69).
Thus, a Member State representative, whose term of office had ended in July 1995, was selected to draw up the 1995 annual follow-up report by the DGs managing the programme. 
De generaldirektorat som frvaltade programmet valde sledes en representant fr en medlemsstat vars mandattid hade gtt ut i juli 1995 fr den rliga vervakningsrapporten fr 1995.
The possibility of selecting candidates with previous experience in following up programmes was confirmed, but without enabling one and the same group of experts to be used, as was the case with the 1995 and 1996 follow-up exercises. 
Mjligheten att vlja kandidater med tidigare erfarenhet av att flja upp program bekrftades, utan att man emellertid tillt att en och samma grupp av experter kunde anvndas, vilket var fallet fr uppfljningarna r 1995 och 1996.
Proposal evaluation 35. 
Bedmning av frslagen 35.
The procedure provides for two successive stages: scientific evaluation of the proposals and preparation of the list of activities proposed for Community financing that is submitted to the FAIR Programme Committee and for a Commission Decision. 
Frfarandet omfattar tv successiva etapper; en vetenskaplig bedmning av frslagen och utarbetande av en frteckning ver freslagna tgrder fr gemenskapsfinansiering som framlggs fr FAIR:s programkommitt och kommissionen fr beslut.
The task of scientific evaluation is entrusted to groups of independent experts who are asked to grade the scientific and technical value of the proposals submitted on the basis of questionnaires drawn up beforehand, and to decide on a summary analysis. 
Fr den vetenskapliga utvrderingen ansvarar de oberoende expertgrupperna, som p basis av p frhand utarbetade frgeformulr skall bedma de inlmnade frslagens vetenskapliga och tekniska vrde och besluta sig fr en vergripande bedmning.
However, this system for marking proposals does not in itself enable the final mark awarded to be justified completely. 
Det r emellertid inte mjligt att endast med hjlp av detta system fr bedmning av frslagen p ett fullstndigt stt motivera den slutbedmning som ges.
For example, in the case of some of the proposals examined, the marking scheme did not establish an acceptable degree of consistency between, on the one hand, the expertsŐ individual evaluations and the global evaluation submitted by their group and, on (1) CAMAR, FOREST and FAR. 
I vissa av de fall som granskats faststllde bedmningssystemet inte ngot godtagbart samband mellan  ena sidan experternas enskilda bedmningar och gruppens vergripande bedmning och  andra sidan mellan de vergripande (1) CAMAR, FOREST och FAR.
(2) OJ C 232, 31.7.1997. 
(2) EGT C 232, 31.7.1997.
30.3.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 92/9 the other, the global evaluations in relation to each other. 
30.3.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 92/9 bedmningarna.
With regard to the FAIR programme demonstration projects, there was greater assurance of such consistency, as the evaluation tied a point-based marking system in with the expertsŐ comments, based on a combination already used for many programmes managed by the DG for Science, Research and Development. 
Vad gller FAIR:s demonstrationsprojekt skerstlldes detta samband p ett bttre stt, eftersom bedmningen sammankopplade ett pongbaserat bedmningssystem med experternas kommentarer enligt en kombination som redan gller fr ett flertal program vid generaldirektoratet ÓVetenskap, forskning och utvecklingÓ.
It emphasised, inter alia, the private, independent and confidential nature of the service to be provided. 
Bland annat betonades den privata, oberoende och konfidentiella naturen hos den tjnst som skulle tillhandahllas.
It also precluded the selection of any expert whose organisation would be a partner to the proposal submitted for evaluation by the person concerned. 
Man uteslt ven mjligheten att vlja en expert vars organisation skulle vara part i det frslag som bedmdes.
Nevertheless, the lack of a specific procedure and legal framework did not give these provisions the force they deserved. 
Avsaknaden av ett srskilt frfarande och en lagstiftningsram medfrde emellertid att dessa bestmmelser inte fick den vikt som hade varit ndvndig.
In some cases, the links that were found between the expert assessors and the organisations presented in the research proposals examined confirmed this. 
I vissa fall bekrftades detta genom de kopplingar som kunde konstateras mellan bedmningsexperterna och de organisationer som presenterades i de granskade forskningsfrslagen.
Decision-making procedures 39. 
Beslutsfrfaranden 39.
After RTD proposals have been evaluated and a favourable opinion has been received from the Programme Committee, the Commission decides on the finance to be granted using the written procedure. 
Efter det att bedmningen av frslagen till FoTU avslutats och programkommittn avgivit ett positivt yttrande beslutar kommissionen genom skriftligt frfarande om beviljande av medel.