natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
71 The assessment of reasonableness of costs has been largely covered in the guidance on controls and penalties for rural development, which also includes information on the use of reference prices. 
71 Bedmningen av kostnaders rimlighet har i hg grad behandlats i vgledningen om kontroller och pfljder inom landsbygdsutveckling, vilken ven innehller information om anvndning av referenspriser.
Reply of the Commission 62 72 Infrastructure projects must ensure that during the 5 years following the final payment, there is no substantial change of the projects affecting their nature, objectives or implementation conditions which would result in undermining of their original objectives. This is to be verified with ex post checks on a sample basis as provided by Article 52 of Regulation (EU) No 809/2014. 
Kommissionens svar 62 72 Nr det gller infrastrukturprojekt fr det inte ske ngon vsentlig ndring av projekten som pverkar deras karaktr, ml eller genomfrandevillkor och som leder till att deras ursprungliga ml under-grvs. Detta ska kontrolleras genom stickprovskontroller i efterhand i enlighet med artikel 52 i frordning (EU) nr 809/2014.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 79 and 81 In the 2007-2013 programming period, the CMEF was a new feature. 
Kommissionens gemensamma svar avseende punkterna 79 och 81 Under programperioden 2007Đ2013 var den gemensamma vervaknings-och utvrderingsramen (CMEF) ny.
Information available through the monitoring and evaluation system, while incomplete and possibly not always fully reliable, was the best available at this stage, taking into account financial and practical limitations. 
Informationen frn vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemet var, ven om den var ofullstndig och kanske inte alltid helt tillfrlitlig, den bsta som fanns tillgnglig vid denna tidpunkt med tanke p de ekonomiska och praktiska begrnsningarna.
The Commission has proposed solutions for a number of problems related to the monitoring and evaluation system for the programming period 2014-2020 but there will always be the need to find a balance between the benefits of monitoring and evaluation and the costs and administrative burden related to it. 
Kommissionen har freslagit lsningar p en rad problem som rr vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemet fr programperioden 2014Đ2020, men det kommer alltid att vara ndvndigt att vga nyttan av vervaknings-och utvrderingsaktiviteterna mot den kostnad och administrativa brda som de ger upphov till.
80 In its observation letters addressed to the Member States concerning the annual progress reports, the Commission has invited the authorities to speed up the process of quantification of the indicators. 
80 I sina skrivelser till medlemsstaterna med iakttagelser om de rliga lgesrapporterna har kommissionen uppmanat myndigheterna att skynda p kvantifieringen av indikatorerna.
Box 15 The fact that only a few hundred of persons live in a village in which a road is built does not give information on how many actually use it or might use it. 
Ruta 15 Det faktum att bara ngra f hundra personer bor i en by dr en vg byggs sger inget om hur mnga personer som faktiskt anvnder eller kan komma att anvnda den.
Not only the rural population benefits from improved services in rural areas. 
Det r inte bara landsbygdsinvnarna som gynnas av frbttrade tjnster i landsbygdsomrden.
The double counting of the rural population for the aims of measure 322 (village renewal) was intended and is a result of the adopted methodology. 
Att landsbygdsinvnarna rknades flera gnger nr det gller tgrd 322 (frnyelse av byar) var avsiktligt och r en fljd av den metod som har antagits.
83 There is no legal requirement for setting quantified targets for each individual projects. 
83 Det finns inget rttsligt krav om att kvantifierade ml ska faststllas fr varje enskilt projekt.
As shown in Annex II to the report, four out of five Polish projects had quantifiable results, while the only exception related to the cultural/sport infrastructure. 
Enligt det gemensamma vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemet ska ml faststllas i landsbygdsprogrammet av frvaltningsmyndigheten. Som framgr av bilaga II hade fyra av fem polska projekt kvantifierbara resultat.
85 For 2014-2020 CMES, the new result indicator 'Change in agricultural output on supported farms/ annual work unit’ will be assessed by external evaluators in 2017 and 2019 and in the ex post evaluations. 
85 Infr perioden 2014Đ2020 kommer den nya resultatindikatorn Ófrndring i jordbruksproduktionen p fretag som erhller std/AE (rsarbetsenhet)Ó i det gemensamma vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemet att bedmas av externa utvrderare r 2017, 2019 och i efterhandsutvrderingarna.
The Commission considers that this frequency is appropriate taking into account the cost/benefit ratio of such evaluations. 
Kommissionen anser att denna frekvens r lmplig med tanke p kostnads-/nyttoeffekten av sdana utvrderingar.
86 The two 2014-2020 CMES indicators (the output and result indicators 'population benefiting from improved services/infrastructure') will complement each other. 
86 De tv indikatorerna i det gemensamma vervaknings- och utvrderingssystemet 2014Đ2020 (output-och resultatindikatorerna Óprocentandel av landsbygdsbefolkningen som fr ta del av frbttrade tjnster/infrastrukturÓ) kommer att komplettera varandra.
They will measure respectively the gross and the net number of population benefiting for the operations. 
De kommer att mta bruttoantalet respektive nettoantalet invnare som gynnas av insatserna.
The progress of the programmes against these targets is regularly monitored. This approach reflects a result orientation of the policy and enables the combined effects of measures against relevant objectives to be better assessed. 
Programmens framsteg mot dessa delml vervakas regelbundet. Denna metod avspeglar politikens resultatinriktning och gr det lttare att f verblick ver tgrders samlade effekter i frhllande till relevanta ml.
Conclusions and recommendations 93 The Member States were encouraged to include in their RDPs the most important rural areas to be developed. 
Kommissionens svar 63 Slutsatser och rekommendationer 93 Medlemsstaterna uppmuntrades att inkludera de viktigaste landsbygdsomrden som ska utvecklas.
The EAFRD has permitted the funding of investments which otherwise might not have been funded. 
Ejflu har gjort att man kan finansiera investeringar som kanske annars inte skulle ha finansierats.
94 Sharing best practices can best be done ex post, since infrastructure investments are of a longer-term nature and their benefits will be shown at a later stage. 
94 Utbyte av bsta praxis sker bst i efterhand, eftersom infrastrukturinvesteringar r lngsiktiga och de positiva effekterna blir synliga frst efter en tid.
The European Network for Rural Development promotes the sharing of good practices among Member States and regions. 
Det europeiska ntverket fr landsbygdsutveckling verkar fr ett utbyte av god praxis mellan medlemsstater och regioner.
96 Coordination was to be ensured at national and/or regional level. 
96 Samordning skulle skras p nationell och/eller regional niv.
Often integrated approaches at regional and local level have been followed, aiming at optimising the EU co-funding. 
Integrerade metoder har ofta tillmpats p regional och lokal niv som syftat till att optimera EU:s medfinansiering.
97 The interventions under the RDPs are co-financed by the Commission and the Member States. 
97 Insatserna i landsbygdsprogrammen finansieras gemensamt av kommissionen och medlemsstaterna.
In the context of scarcity of national financial resources, the EAFRD has allowed the Member States and regions to fund interventions in rural areas, which otherwise may have not been financed, to the benefit of local populations. 
Nr det har saknats nationella finansiella resurser har Ejflu gjort att medlemsstater och regioner kan finansiera insatser i landsbygdsomrden som kanske annars inte skulle ha finansierats, vilket har gynnat lokalbefolkningen.
Reply of the Commission 64 98 In the 2007-2013 programming period, the Member States were requested to justify their investment priorities based on a SWOT analysis of needs. 
Kommissionens svar 64 98 Under programperioden 2007Đ2013 ombads medlemsstaterna motivera sina investeringsprioriteringar p grundval av en swot-analys av freliggande behov.
Provisions concerning strategic programming and an effective coordination of the use of different funds have been strengthened in the 2014-2020 programming period. 
Bestmmelserna om strategisk programplanering och effektiv samordning av utnyttjandet av olika fonder har skrpts under programperioden 2014Đ2020.
The risk of deadweight has to be considered on a case-by-case basis, depending on the type of investments concerned and local investment conditions. 
Risken fr ddviktseffekt mste bedmas frn fall till fall, beroende p typen av investeringar och lokala investeringsfrhllanden.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 99 and 100 The demarcation and complementarities were detailed in the 2007-2013 programming documents. While the support by different funds to the same type of interventions does not necessarily compromise the added value of the contributions, double funding of the same investment was excluded through the establishment of demarcation lines. 
Kommissionens gemensamma svar avseende punkterna 99 och 100 Avgrnsning och komplementaritet har beskrivits nrmare i programplaneringsdokumenten fr perioden 2007Đ2013. ven om stdet frn olika fonder till samma typ av insatser inte ndvndigtvis minskar mervrdet av bidragen frhindrades dubbelfinansiering av samma investering genom att det faststlldes avgrnsningar.
Synergies have been encouraged by allowing joint interventions by different funds in certain areas, while demarcation was ensured through the use of criteria such as financial ceilings or physical parameters. 
Synergieffekter har uppmuntrats genom att gemensamma insatser av olika fonder inom vissa omrden har tilltits, samtidigt som avgrnsning har skerstllts med hjlp av kriterier som finansieringstak eller fysiska parametrar.
For the 2014-2020 programming period, the issue of complementarity and demarcation was raised in the RDPs. 
Frgan om komplementaritet och avgrnsning togs upp i landsbygdsprogrammen infr programperioden 2014Đ2020.
Also, the so-called ‘Commission services’ position papers’ drawn up for each Member State provided guidance on the coordinated interventions of the ESIF. 
I de s.k. stndpunktsdokument som kommissionen utarbetar fr varje medlemsstat gavs dessutom vgledning om samordnade tgrder fr ESI-fonderna.
The Member States have to ensure the complementarity, consistency and conformity with other EU instruments. 
Medlemsstaterna mste skerstlla komplementaritet, enhetlighet och verensstmmelse med andra EU-instrument.
Recommendation 1 (a) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Rekommendation 1 a) Denna rekommendation riktar sig till medlemsstaterna.
Recommendation 1 (b) The Commission accepts the recommendation and has started to implement it. 
Rekommendation 1 b) Kommissionen godtar rekommendationen och har brjat genomfra den.
Exchange of best practices concerning the mitigation of the risk of deadweight will be promoted through the activities of the European Rural Development Network. 
Utbyte av bsta praxis nr det gller att minska risken fr ddviktseffekt kommer att frmjas via aktiviteter inom det europeiska ntverket fr landsbygdsutveckling.
Mechanisms to ensure better complementarities and coordination between funds have been reinforced in the 2014-2020 programming period through the partnership agreements, where the Member States have to describe the use of ESIF in order to ensure complementarity and synergies of activities. 
Mekanismerna fr att uppn bttre komplementaritet och samordning mellan fonder har frstrkts under programperioden 2014Đ2020 genom partnerskapsavtalen, dr medlemsstaterna mste beskriva utnyttjandet av ESI-fonder fr att skerstlla komplementaritet och synergieffekter mellan olika aktiviteter.
The issue of complementarity and demarcation was also raised in the RDPs. While the principle of additionality of RDP resources to national funds is addressed at programme level by applying the relevant co-financing rates, the Commission will continue to promote efficiency in rural development spending. 
Frgan om komplementaritet och avgrnsning togs ven upp i landsbygdsprogrammen. ven om principen om att resurserna frn landsbygdsprogrammen inte fr erstta nationella medel (additionalitetsprincipen) fljs p programniv genom tillmpning av relevanta medfinansieringssatser kommer kommissionen fortstta att frmja effektivitet i stdet till landsbygdsutveckling.
Reply of the Commission 65 Recommendation 1 (c) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Kommissionens svar 65 Rekommendation 1 c) Denna rekommendation riktar sig till medlemsstaterna.
Recommendation 1 (d) The Commission accepts this recommendation and has started to implement it. 
Rekommendation 1 d) Kommissionen godtar denna rekommendation och har brjat genomfra den.
When establishing the legal framework for the 2014-2020 programming period, the Commission has taken the necessary steps to improve coordination between different funds as regards the support to rural infrastructures. 
Nr kommissionen faststllde regelverket infr programperioden 2014Đ2020 vidtogs ndvndiga tgrder fr att frbttra samordningen mellan olika fonder vad gller stdet till infrastruktur p landsbygden.
Coordination and complementarity of EU funds at the level of national/regional strategies is addressed by the different services of the Commission. 
Samordning och komplementaritet mellan EU:s fonder i nationella/regionala strategier r ngot som kommissionens olika avdelningar arbetar med.
It is however for national/regional authorities to enforce such coordination/complementarity at measure/ project levels when implementing the programmes. 
Det r emellertid de nationella/regionala myndigheterna som mste verkstlla en sdan samordning/komplementaritet nr det gller enskilda tgrder/projekt i samband med programmens genomfrande.
The Commission will regularly monitor and assess implementation in the Member States within the established framework for monitoring and reporting. 
Kommissionen kommer regelbundet att vervaka och bedma genomfrandet i medlemsstaterna inom den faststllda ramen fr vervakning och rapportering.
103 The Commission's audits have also identified weaknesses in the systems put in place in the Member States to assess the reasonableness of costs. 
103 ven kommissionens revisioner har pvisat brister i de system som medlemsstaterna har infrt fr att bedma projektkostnadernas rimlighet.
In some cases, financial corrections have been imposed. 
I vissa fall har finansiella korrigeringar gjorts.
The improvement of checks on the reasonableness of costs and public procurement is a priority for the Commission. 
Bttre kontroller av kostnaders rimlighet och av offentliga upphandlingar r ngot som kommissionen prioriterar.
Training related to these issues has been delivered for the managing authorities and paying agencies and specific guidance has been issued. 
Utbildning i dessa frgor har erbjudits frvaltningsmyndigheter och utbetalande organ, och srskild vgledning har utfrdats.
As regards public procurement, an action plan for all ESI funds and specific guidance for practitioners, training courses and dedicated webpages are being developed. 
Nr det gller offentlig upphandling hller en handlingsplan fr alla ESI-fonder och srskild vgledning fr ansvariga, utbildning och srskilda webbsidor p att utarbetas.
Public procurement is an ex ante conditionality for all ESI funds and where there is not enough assurance that procedures and institutions in place can manage EU funds in an effective and efficient way, respecting the legality of the transactions, payments to the Member States might be suspended. 
Offentlig upphandling r ett frhandsvillkor fr alla ESI-fonder och om tillrckliga frskringar inte kan ges fr att befintliga frfaranden och institutioner kan frvalta EU-medlen p ett effektivt och ndamlsenligt stt som respekterar transaktionernas lagenlighet kan utbetalningarna till medlemsstaterna stllas in.
104 While requiring the submission of a maintenance plan may be considered as a good practice for certain investments, there is no legal obligation to do so. 
104 ven om det kan anses vara god praxis i samband med vissa investeringar att krva in en underhllsplan finns det ingen rttslig skyldighet att gra detta.
105 While setting administrative deadlines may be considered as a good practice, there are no legal provisions that empower the Commission to force Member States to set such deadlines. 
105 ven om administrativa tidsfrister kan betraktas som god praxis finns det inga rttsliga bestmmelser som ger kommissionen rtt att tvinga medlemsstaterna att faststlla sdana tidsfrister.
Recommendation 2 (a) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Rekommendation 2 a) Denna rekommendation riktar sig till medlemsstaterna.
Recommendation 2 (b) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Rekommendation 2 b) Kommissionen godtar denna rekommendation.
The Commission is implementing the recommendations made in Special Report No 22/2014 by delivering specific training for the managing authorities and paying agencies, enhanced assessment of the verifiability and controllability of the measures and promotion of the use of simplified cost options. 
Kommissionen hller p att genomfra rekommendationerna i den srskilda rapporten 22/2014 genom att erbjuda srskild utbildning till frvaltningsmyndigheter och utbetalande organ, frbttrade bedmningar av tgrdernas verifierbarhet och kontrollerbarhet, samt genom att frmja frenklade kostnadsalternativ.
Financial corrections will be applied in cases of non-compliance. 
Finansiella korrigeringar kommer att gras vid bristande verensstmmelse.
Reply of the Commission 66 Recommendation 2 (c) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Kommissionens svar 66 Rekommendation 2 c) Denna rekommendation riktar sig till medlemsstaterna.
Recommendation 2 (d) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Rekommendation 2 d) Denna rekommendation riktar sig till medlemsstaterna.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 107 and 108 Information available through the monitoring and evaluation system was the best available at this stage, taking into account financial and practical limitations. 
Kommissionens gemensamma svar avseende punkterna 107 och 108 Informationen frn vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemet var den bsta som fanns tillgnglig vid denna tidpunkt med tanke p de ekonomiska och praktiska begrnsningarna.
The Commission has proposed a number of improvements to the monitoring and evaluation system for the 2014-2020 programming period, while considering the need to find a balance between the benefits of monitoring and evaluation and the costs and administrative burden related to it. 109 The 2014-2020 monitoring and evaluation system incorporates a number of improvements. 
Kommissionen har freslagit en rad frbttringar av vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemet fr programperioden 2014Đ 2020, men samtidigt beaktat vikten av att vga nyttan av vervaknings-och utvrderingsaktiviteterna mot den kostnad och administrativa brda som de ger upphov till. 109 Flera frbttringar har gjorts i vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemet fr 2014Đ2020.
Enhanced annual implementation reports (AIRs) will be issued in 2017 and 2019, which will incorporate evaluation findings. 
Utkade rliga genomfranderapporter kommer att sammanstllas 2017 och 2019 som innefattar utvrderingsresultat.
The first report will concentrate on the programme steering and the second one on the assessment of the impact of the RDPs. 
Den frsta rapporten kommer att vara inriktad p programstyrning och den andra p bedmning av landsbygdsprogrammens effekter.
The Member States will be required to carry out evaluation activities throughout the programming period in accordance with the evaluation plan included in the RDPs. 
Medlemsstaterna kommer att vara tvungna att utfra utvrderingsaktiviteter under hela programperioden i enlighet med den utvrderingsplan som ingr i landsbygdsprogrammen.
The assessment and reporting on the results and impacts of the policy will be linked more appropriately to the stage of implementation. 
Bedmningen och rapporteringen av politikens resultat och effekter kommer att kopplas ihop p ett bttre stt med skedet i genomfrandet.
To further underpin the result orientation of the policy, its assessment against relevant policy objectives will be strengthened. 
Fr att ytterligare strka politikens resultatinriktning kommer bedmningen mot relevanta politiska ml att frstrkas.
Moreover, the Commission stresses the importance of evaluation to interpret and analyse the data collected in order to draw conclusions on effectiveness or efficiency. 
Kommissionen understryker vidare vikten av att i samband med utvrderingar tolka och analysera de uppgifter som samlas in i syfte att dra slutsatser om ndamlsenlighet och effektivitet.
Recommendation 3 (b) This recommendation is for the Member States. 
Rekommendation 3 b) Denna rekommendation riktar sig till medlemsstaterna.
The EU co-finances investments in rural infrastructure with the aim to improve competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sectors and increase the quality of life in rural areas. 
EU medfinansierar investeringar i infrastruktur p landsbygden fr att ka konkurrensen i jordbruks-och skogsbrukssektorn och frbttra livskvaliteten p landsbygden.
This audit examined whether the Member States and the European Commission have achieved value for money with the funds allocated. 
Vid revisionen underskte vi om medlemsstaterna och Europeiska kommissionen fick valuta fr de tilldelade medlen.
The audit found that the need for EU rural development funding was not always clearly justified, coordination with other funds was weak and selection procedures did not systematically direct funding towards the most cost-effective projects. 
Vi konstaterade att behovet av EU:s landsbygdsutvecklingsfinansiering inte alltid motiverades klart och tydligt, att samordningen med andra medel var bristfllig och att urvalsfrfarandena inte systematiskt riktade in finansieringen p de kostnadseffektivaste projekten.
The Commission and the Member States have not collected adequate information on the effectiveness or efficiency of the measures funded, making it difficult to direct future policy and manage the budget by results. 
Kommissionen och medlemsstaterna har inte samlat in tillrcklig information om hur ndamlsenliga och effektiva de finansierade tgrderna r, vilket gr det svrt att rikta framtida politik och frvalta budgeten utifrn resultat.
EN 2016 Special Report NO 01 Is the Commission’s system for performance measurement in relation to farmers’ incomes well designed and based on sound data? EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 
SV 2016 Särskild rapport nr 01 Är kommissionens resultatmätningssystem för jordbrukarnas inkomster väl utformat och baserat på tillförlitliga uppgifter? EUROPEISKA REVISIONSRÄTTEN
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-4055-2 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-4048-4 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-4022-4 ISSN 1831-0834 ISSN 1977-5679 ISSN 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/72393 doi:10.2865/06260 doi:10.2865/38409 QJ-AB-16-001-EN-C QJ-AB-16-001-EN-N QJ-AB-16-001-EN-E © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 
Luxemburg: Europeiska unionens publikationsbyrå, 2016 Print ISBN 978-92-872-4042-2 ISSN 1831-0990 PDF ISBN 978-92-872-4009-5 ISSN 1977-5830 EPUB ISBN 978-92-872-4017-0 ISSN 1977-5830 doi:10.2865/6640 doi:10.2865/77556 doi:10.2865/63682 QJ-AB-16-001-SV-C QJ-AB-16-001-SV-N QJ-AB-16-001-SV-E © Europeiska unionen, 2016 Kopiering tillåten med angivande av källan.
The diagram on p. 
Diagrammet på s.