natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The ECB will evaluate its NWoW pilot project (launched in January 2018 and expected to be completed in 2020) from an economic cost and benefit perspective and will consider integrating the results into strategic reflections on the development of its relevant policies. 
ECB kommer att utvärdera NWoW-projektet (inlett i januari 2018 – beräknad slutpunkt 2020) utifrån ett kostnads-/nyttoperspektiv och överväga integrering i strategiska överläggningar om utveckling av relevant policy.
Recommendation 3 It is the ECB’s understanding that it is not addressed by recommendation 3. 
Rekommendation 3 ECB anser sig inte omfattas av rekommendation 3.
Please see the comment on Paragraph VIII of the executive summary. 
Se kommentaren om punkt VIII i sammanfattningen.
Recommendation 4 It is the ECB’s understanding that it is not addressed by recommendation 4. 
Rekommendation 4 ECB anser sig inte omfattas av rekommendation 4.
Recommendation 5 It is the ECB’s understanding that it is not addressed by recommendation 5. 
Rekommendation 1 ECB anser sig inte omfattas av rekommendation 5.
Event Date Adoption of Audit Planning Memorandum (APM) / Start of audit 6.6.2017 Official sending of draft report to auditees 19.7.2018 Adoption of the final report after the adversarial procedure 5.12.2018 Official replies received in all languages Parliament: 23.11.2018 Council: 15.11.2018 Commission: 30.11.2018 Court of Justice: 18.12.2018 Central Bank: 27.11.2018 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1587-9 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/896619 QJ-AB-18-033-EN-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1614-2 1977-5679 doi:10.2865/11532 QJ-AB-18-033-EN-Q 
Händelse Datum Revisionsplanen antogs/Revisionen inleddes den 6 juni 2017 Den preliminära rapporten skickades till revisionsobjekten den 19 juli 2018 Den slutliga rapporten antogs efter det kontradiktoriska förfarandet den 5 december 2018 Officiella svar hade tagits emot på alla språk Europaparlamentet: den 23 november 2018 Rådet: den 15 november 2018 Kommissionen: den 30 november 2018 Domstolen: 18 december 2018 ECB: den 27 november 2018 PDF ISBN 978-92-847-1598-5 1977-5830 doi:10.2865/09024 QJ-AB-18-033-SV-N HTML ISBN 978-92-847-1589-3 1977-5830 doi:10.2865/591409 QJ-AB-18-033-SV-Q
The institutions spend around 11 % of their budget on administrative expenditure for buildings. 
Cirka 11 % av institutionernas budget går till administrativa utgifter för lokaler.
The composition of the buildings portfolios differs and depends on each institution’s mandate and organisational structure, nevertheless a significant share of the space used is devoted to office accommodation. 
Sammansättningen av institutionernas fastighetsbestånd skiljer sig åt och är beroende av varje institutions mandat och organisationsstruktur. En stor del av utrymmet används dock som kontorslokaler.
The Commission has the largest buildings portfolio of which more than 80 % is office space. 
Kommissionen har det största fastighetsbeståndet, varav mer än 80 % är kontorsutrymme.
We examined the management of expenditure on office accommodation of the five institutions with the most office accommodation (Parliament, Council, Commission, Court of Justice and ECB). 
Vi granskade hur de fem institutioner som har flest kontorslokaler (Europaparlamentet, rådet, kommissionen, domstolen och ECB) förvaltar utgifter för kontorslokaler.
We covered their buildings in Brussels, Luxembourg and Frankfurt and compared their data and management procedures with other EU institutions and bodies. 
Vi tittade på deras byggnader i Bryssel, Luxemburg och Frankfurt, och jämförde deras uppgifter och förvaltningsförfaranden med dem som andra EU-institutioner och EU-organ har.
Overall, we found that the institutions manage their spending on office accommodation efficiently and decisions on office accommodation were well founded. 
Vår allmänna slutsats var att institutionerna förvaltar sina utgifter för kontorslokaler ändamålsenligt och att besluten om kontorslokaler var välgrundade.
They cooperate with each other and apply similar decision-making principles. 
Institutionerna samarbetar med varandra och tillämpar liknande principer i beslutsprocessen.
However, their building strategies are not always formalised and were sometimes outdated. 
Deras fastighetsstrategier är dock inte alltid formaliserade och var ibland föråldrade.
The financing mechanisms of the large construction projects we analysed were often complex and, in some cases, affected budgetary transparency. Most of these projects were delayed, which in some cases, led to additional costs. 
Finansieringsmekanismerna för de stora byggprojekt som vi analyserade var ofta komplexa, vilket i några fall påverkade insynen i budgeten. De flesta projekten var försenade, vilket i vissa fall ledde till merkostnader.
Most institutions do not adequately monitor their buildings’ portfolio. 
De flesta institutionerna övervakar inte sitt fastighetsbestånd på ett tillfredsställande sätt.
The institutions need to develop common indicators and improve the consistency of data presented to the budgetary authorities. 
Institutionerna behöver utarbeta gemensamma indikatorer och göra de uppgifter som rapporteras till budgetmyndigheterna mer enhetliga.
EN 2018 Special Report NO 35 Transparency of EU funds implemented by NGOs: more effort needed (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) 
SV 2018 Srskild rapport nr 35 Insyn i EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer: mer mste gras (i enlighet med artikel 287.4 andra stycket i EUF-frdraget)
This performance audit was carried out by Audit Chamber V Financing and administration of the EU, headed by ECA Member Lazaros S. Lazarou. 
Denna effektivitetsrevision utfrdes av revisionsrttens avdelning V EU:s finansiering och frvaltning, dr ledamoten Lazaros S. Lazarou r ordfrande.
The audit was led by ECA Member Annemie Turtelboom, supported by Dennis Wernerus, Head of Private Office; Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch, Principal Manager; Roberto Ruiz Ruiz, Head of Task; Eva Maria Coria Paramas, Erika Katalin Söveges, Maria-Luisa Gomez Valcarcel and Francesco Zoia Bolzonello, Auditors. 
Revisionsarbetet leddes av ledamoten Annemie Turtelboom med std av Dennis Wernerus (kanslichef), Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch (frstechef), Roberto Ruiz (uppgiftsansvarig) och Eva Maria Coria Paramas, Erika Katalin Sveges, Maria-Luisa Gomez Valcarcel och Francesco Zoia Bolzonello (revisorer).
Linguistic support was provided by Hannah Critoph. 
Sprkligt std gavs av Hannah Critoph.
From left to right: Hannah Critoph, Roberto Ruiz Ruiz, Annemie Turtelboom, Erika Katalin Söveges, Dennis Wernerus. 
Frn vnster till hger: Hannah Critoph, Roberto Ruiz, Annemie Turtelboom, Erika Katalin Sveges och Dennis Wernerus.
Acronyms and abbreviations Executive summary Introduction The concept of NGO EU funding and NGOs The concept of transparency Audit scope and approach Observations Paragraph I - IX 1 - 7 1 2 3 - 5 6 - 7 8 - 17 18-62 18-27 19-20 21-27 28-39 28-33 34-39 40-49 41-42 43-47 CONTENTS The Commission’s identification of entities as NGOs in its systems is not reliable In most cases, the eligibility of EU funding does not depend on the NGO status The Commission performs limited checks on the entities’ self-declarations as NGOs when registering them in the accounting system In external action, the selection of NGO-led projects was overall transparent, but with shortcomings when done by third parties Commission's selection of NGO-led projects was generally transparent Sub-granting of funds to third-party NGOs sometimes lacked transparency The Commission does not collect and check the information on EU funds provided to NGOs effectively Commission systems do not always record information on funds received by all the beneficiaries of a contract In external action, the Commission does not have comprehensive information on all NGOs supported 2 
Akronymer och frkortningar Sammanfattning Inledning Punkt IĐIX 1Đ7 1Đ2 3Đ5 6Đ7 8Đ17 18Đ62 18Đ27 19Đ20 21Đ27 28Đ39 28Đ33 34Đ39 40Đ49 41Đ42 INNEHLL Begreppet icke-statlig organisation EU:s finansiering och icke-statliga organisationer Begreppet ppenhet Revisionens inriktning och omfattning samt revisionsmetod Iakttagelser Kommissionens identifiering av enheter som icke-statliga organisationer i sina system r inte tillfrlitlig I de flesta fall avgrs inte berttigandet till EU-finansiering av statusen som icke-statlig organisation Kommissionen gr begrnsade kontroller av enheternas egen frskran om att de r icke-statliga organisationer nr de registreras i redovisningssystemet Inom yttre tgrder var valet av projekt som leddes av icke-statliga organisationer transparent, men det hade brister nr det gjordes av tredje part Kommissionens val av projekt som leddes av icke-statliga organisationer var i allmnhet transparent Ibland saknades insyn nr icke-statliga organisationer som tredje part tilldelades bidrag i flera led Kommissionen samlar inte alltid in och kontrollerar informationen om EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer p lmpligt stt Kommissionens system registrerar inte alltid information om de anslag som varje stdmottagare i ett kontrakt erhller 2
In indirect management, the lack of information available hindered the Commission's checks on the costs declared Information on EU funds implemented by NGOs is published in several systems but the information disclosed is limited Information on contracts with NGOs is published in the Financial Transparency System but is incomplete Information on humanitarian and development aid is generally disclosed in accordance with international transparency standards The UN bodies published inadequate information on the contracts awarded to NGOs Conclusions and recommendations Annex I - Audited projects under direct management Annex II - Audited projects under indirect management Annex III - Assessment of the individual projects – Overview Reply of the Commission 48-49 50-62 51-56 57-60 61-62 63-74 3 
P omrdet yttre tgrder har kommissionen inte heltckande information om alla icke-statliga organisationer som fr std Vid indirekt frvaltning utgjorde bristen p tillgnglig information ett hinder fr kommissionens kontroll av de deklarerade kostnaderna Information om EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer offentliggrs i flera system, men den redovisade informationen r begrnsad Information om kontrakt med icke-statliga organisationer offentliggrs i systemet fr finansiell transparens, men den r ofullstndig Information om humanitrt bistnd och utvecklingsbistnd offentliggrs i allmnhet i enlighet med internationella ppenhetsnormer FN-organen offentliggjorde otillrcklig information om de kontrakt som tilldelats icke-statliga organisationer Slutsatser och rekommendationer Bilaga I Đ Granskade projekt med direkt frvaltning Bilaga II Đ Granskade projekt med indirekt frvaltning Bilaga III Đ Bedmning av de enskilda projekten Đ versikt Kommissionens svar 43Đ47 48Đ49 50Đ62 51Đ56 57Đ60 61Đ62 63Đ74 3
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 4 ABAC CORDIS CRIS CSO DG BUDG DG DEVCO DG EAC DG ECHO DG ENV DG NEAR DG RTD EACEA EASME EDF EDRIS ERCEA FTS IATI MFF NGO OECD PADOR REA UNICEF Accrual-based accounting system of the Commission Community Research and Development Information Service Common External Relations Information System Civil society organisation Directorate-General for Budget Directorate General for International Cooperation and Development Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations Directorate-General for Environment Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency Executive Agency for Small and Medium Enterprises European Development Fund European Disaster Response Information System European Research Council Executive Agency Financial Transparency System International Aid Transparency Initiative Multiannual financial framework Non-governmental organisation Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Potential Applicant Data Online Registration System Research Executive Agency United Nations Children's Fund 
AKRONYMER OCH F RKORTNINGAR 4 ABAC: CORDIS: Cris: Eacea: Easme: Edris: Ercea: EUF: GD BUDG: GD DEVCO: GD EAC: GD Echo: GD ENV: GD NEAR: GD RTD: Iati: NGO: OECD: REA: Unicef: kommissionens system fr periodiserad redovisning. gemenskapens informationstjnst fr forskning och utveckling. det gemensamma informationssystemet fr yttre frbindelser. genomfrandeorganet fr utbildning, audiovisuella medier och kultur. genomfrandeorganet fr sm och medelstora fretag. det europeiska informationssystemet fr nd-och katastrofinsatser. genomfrandeorganet fr Europeiska forskningsrdet.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The Commission implements an estimated 1.7 % of the EU budget and 6.8 % of the European Development Funds (EDFs) through NGOs. 
SAMMANFATTNING I. Kommissionen genomfr uppskattningsvis 1,7 % av EU:s budget och 6,8 % av Europeiska utvecklingsfonden (EUF) via icke-statliga organisationer.
In many policy areas, such as humanitarian and development aid, the environment, and research and innovation, NGOs assist the Commission to design, implement and monitor EU programmes. 
P mnga politikomrden, ssom humanitrt bistnd och utvecklingsbistnd, miljn samt forskning och innovation, assisterar icke-statliga organisationer kommissionen med utformningen, genomfrandet och vervakningen av EU-program.
During 2014-2017, the Commission committed an estimated €11.3 billion for implementation by NGOs. 
Mellan 2014 och 2017 anslog kommissionen cirka 11,3 miljarder euro som skulle frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer.
The European Parliament has frequently expressed interest in NGOs and their funding. 
Europaparlamentet har ofta intresserat sig fr icke-statliga organisationer och anslagen till dem.
The objective of our audit was to assess the transparency of EU funds contracted with NGOs. 
Syftet med vr revision var att bedma insynen i EU-medel som varit freml fr kontrakt med icke-statliga organisationer.
We assessed the Commission’s identification of entities as NGOs, where the EU funds implemented by NGOs go and whether the Commission disclosed this information in a transparent manner. 
Vi bedmde kommissionens identifiering av enheter som icke-statliga organisationer, vart de EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer gr och om kommissionen offentliggjorde denna information p ett transparent stt.
We covered the main policy areas in which NGOs implement EU funds, focusing in particular on the largest area, external action. 
Vi granskade de viktigaste politikomrdena dr icke-statliga organisationer frvaltar EU-medel och inriktade oss srskilt p det strsta omrdet, yttre tgrder.
We concluded that the Commission was not sufficiently transparent regarding the implementation of EU funds by NGOs. 
Vr slutsats r att kommissionen inte var tillrckligt transparent i frga om EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer.
The assignment of the NGO status in the Commission’s accounting system, which is based on self-declaration, and the limited checks the Commission applied, made the classification of an entity as an NGO unreliable. 
Tilldelningen av status som icke-statlig organisation i kommissionens redovisningssystem, som bygger p en egen frskran, och kommissionens begrnsade kontroller gjorde att klassificeringen av en enhet som icke-statlig organisation var otillfrlitlig.
V. In external action, we found the Commission’s selection of NGO-led projects to be generally transparent. 
V. P omrdet yttre tgrder fann vi att kommissionens val av projekt som leddes av icke-statliga organisationer i allmnhet var transparenta.
However, the different Commission departments did not apply the sub-granting procedures in the same way and the audited UN bodies’ selection procedures of NGOs were not always transparent. 
Kommissionens olika avdelningar tillmpade dock inte frfarandena fr bidrag i flera led p samma stt, och de granskade FN-organens frfaranden fr urval av icke-statliga organisationer var inte alltid transparenta.
The information collected on the EU funds implemented by NGOs is not uniform. 
Den information som samlas in om EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer r inte enhetlig.
This occurred particularly with networks of international NGOs and projects under indirect management. 
Detta var srskilt fallet med ntverk av internationella icke-statliga organisationer och projekt med indirekt frvaltning.
Furthermore, in indirect management, the lack of information available hindered the Commission’s checks on the costs declared. 
bristen p tillgnglig information dessutom ett hinder fr kommissionens kontroll av de deklarerade kostnaderna.
Information on EU funds implemented by NGOs is published in several systems but the information disclosed is limited. 
Information om EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer offentliggrs i flera system, men den redovisade informationen r begrnsad.
reported data on humanitarian and development aid in accordance with international transparency standards. 
P omrdet yttre tgrder rapporterade kommissionen i allmnhet uppgifter om humanitrt bistnd och utvecklingsbistnd i enlighet med internationella ppenhetsnormer.
UN bodies either did not publish, or only partially published, the contracts awarded to NGOs in five of the six projects audited, and the Commission did not check whether the UN bodies had fulfilled this requirement. 
I fem av de sex granskade projekten offentliggjorde FN-organ inte alls eller endast delvis de kontrakt som hade tilldelats icke-statliga organisationer, och kommissionen kontrollerade inte om FN-organen hade uppfyllt detta krav.
On the basis of the observations in this report, we have formulated a number of recommendations for improving the transparency of EU funds implemented by NGOs. 
Baserat p iakttagelserna i denna rapport har vi formulerat ett antal rekommendationer om hur insynen i EU-medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer kan frbttras.
We recommend that the Commission: (a) improve the reliability of the information on NGOs in its accounting system; (b) check the application of rules and procedures regarding sub-granting to NGOs; (c) improve the information collected on funds implemented by NGOs; and (d) adopt a uniform approach to publishing details on funds provided to NGOs and verify the publication by UN bodies of complete and accurate data on contracts awarded to NGOs using EU funding. 6 
Vi rekommenderar att kommissionen a) frbttrar tillfrlitligheten hos informationen om icke-statliga organisationer i sitt redovisningssystem, b) kontrollerar tillmpningen av reglerna och frfarandena fr bidrag i flera led till icke-statliga organisationer, c) frbttrar den information som samlas in om medel som frvaltas av icke-statliga organisationer, d) tillmpar ett enhetligt tillvgagngsstt nr det gller offentliggrande av nrmare uppgifter om medel till icke-statliga organisationer och kontrollerar att FN-organ offentliggr fullstndiga och korrekta uppgifter om kontrakt som tilldelas icke-statliga organisationer med hjlp av EU-medel. 6
INTRODUCTION The concept of NGO 1. 
INLEDNING Begreppet icke-statlig organisation 1.
There is a growing interest in the transparency of NGOs and their funding. 
Det finns ett vxande intresse fr insynen i icke-statliga organisationer och anslagen till dem.
For example, the European Parliament has already issued several studies on the topic1 and a “draft report on the budgetary control of financing NGOs from the EU budget”2. 
Europaparlamentet har till exempel redan offentliggjort flera studier i mnet1 och ett frslag till betnkande om budgetkontroll av finansieringen av icke-statliga organisationer frn EU:s budget2.
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are important actors in the implementation of the EU budget. 
Icke-statliga organisationer r viktiga aktrer i genomfrandet av EU:s budget.
The Commission works with NGOs, among other partners, to design, implement and monitor programmes in many EU policy areas. 
Kommissionen arbetar tillsammans med icke-statliga organisationer, och andra partner, fr att utforma, genomfra och vervaka program p mnga av EU:s politikomrden.
This is especially the case in the areas of development and humanitarian aid, but also in other areas such as the environment, research, education and culture. 
Detta gller i synnerhet omrdena utvecklingssamarbete och humanitrt bistnd men ven andra omrden som miljn, forskning, utbildning och kultur.
However, there is currently no common EU definition for NGOs (see Box 1). 
Fr nrvarande finns det dock ingen gemensam EU-definition av icke-statliga organisationer (se ruta 1).
7 Box 1 – What is an NGO? While the term “NGO” is widely used, it has no generally accepted definition at the international level3. 
7 Ruta 1 Đ Vad r en icke-statlig organisation? ven om anvndningen av termen Óicke-statlig organisationÓ r utbredd har den ingen allmnt accepterad definition p internationell niv3.
Within the EU, NGO status is determined in some Members States by an organisation’s legal form, while in others it depends on the nature of the activities carried out. 1 2 3 European Parliament Directorate General for Internal Policies, EU financing for NGOs in the area of home affairs, security and migration; European Parliament Research Service, Financial accountability of civil society organisations, May 2015; European Parliament Policy Department Budgetary Affairs, Democratic Accountability and Budgetary Control of non-Governmental Organisations Funded by the EU Budget, January 2017. 
Inom EU bestms statusen som icke-statlig organisation 1 2 3 Europaparlamentet, generaldirektoratet fr EU-intern politik, EU financing for NGOs in the area of home affairs, security and migration (EU-finansiering till icke-statliga organisationer p omrdet inrikes frgor, skerhet och migration), Europaparlamentets utredningstjnst, Financial accountability of civil society organisations (ekonomisk ansvarsskyldighet fr organisationer i det civila samhllet), maj 2015, och Europaparlamentet, utredningsavdelningen fr budgetfrgor Democratic Accountability and Budgetary Control of non-Governmental Organisations Funded by the EU Budget (demokratisk ansvarsskyldighet och budgetkontroll nr det gller icke-statliga organisationer som finansieras frn EU:s budget), januari 2017.
The “Draft Report on budgetary control of financing NGOs from the EU budget” (2015/2345(INI) called on the European Court of Auditors to draw up a special report on the transparency of EU funding to NGOs. 
I frslaget till betnkande om budgetkontroll av finansieringen av icke-statliga organisationer frn EU:s budget (2015/2345(INI)) uppmanades revisionsrtten att utarbeta en srskild rapport om transparensen i samband med EU:s finansiering av icke-statliga organisationer.
International organisations use different definitions. 
Internationella organisationer anvnder olika definitioner.
For instance, the United Nations (UN) describes an NGO as any “not-for-profit, voluntary citizens’ group that is organized at a local, national or international level” (https://outreach.un.org/ngorelations/content/about-us-0). 
Exempelvis beskriver Frenta nationerna (FN) en icke-statlig organisation som en ideell, frivillig medborgargrupp som r organiserad p lokal, nationell eller nationell niv (https://outreach.un.org/ngorelations/content/about-us-0).
EU funding and NGOs 3. 
EU:s finansiering och icke-statliga organisationer 3.
NGOs receive most EU funds in their capacity as implementing actors when they carry out programmes and projects on behalf of the Commission5. 
Icke-statliga organisationer fr strre delen av EU-medlen i sin egenskap av genomfrare av program och projekt fr kommissionens rkning5.
NGOs might also be the final beneficiaries of EU action, for example in programmes strengthening civil society. 
De kan ocks vara den slutliga mottagaren av EU-tgrder, till exempel i program fr frstrkning av det civila samhllet.