natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Whatever the approach adopted, the study would help in the setting of concrete objectives to be given priority status in the CI and which give the CI itself added value. 
Oavsett vilken metod som tillmpas skulle en sdan analys kunna anvndas till att faststlla konkreta ml som betraktas som prioriterade fr gemenskapsinitiativet och ger det ett mervrde.
Indicators therefore need to be defined for each strand. Subsequently, setting detailed criteria for the CommissionŐs assessment of CIP proposals would make it possible to adopt a proactive approach towards the Member States. The analyses requested at the level of each CIP should be used to set specific objectives and measure progress at that level. 
Vidare br kommissionen faststlla detaljerade bedmningskriterier fr frslagen till program fr gemenskapsinitiativet vilket skulle gra det mjligt fr kommissionen att arbeta med framfrhllning gentemot medlemsstaterna. De analyser som efterfrgas fr varje program fr gemenskapsinitiativet br anvndas till att faststlla srskilda ml och till att mta de framsteg som gjorts p den nivn.
X. The guidelines and methodology documents should be made available before work starts on preparing CIPs, and the ex ante assessorŐs role and the content of the programme complement need to be clarified. 
X. Riktlinjer och metoddokument br finnas tillgngliga innan programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativet brjar utarbetas, och frhandsbedmarens roll och programkomplementets innehll br klargras.
Finally, in order to encourage cooperation the financial resources allocated to the Initiative should no longer be assigned by Member State, and the work begun on legal cooperation instruments should be completed and the recommendations put into effect. INTRODUCTION Context 1. 
Fr att frmja samarbetet br, slutligen, de finansiella resurser som tilldelas initiativet inte lngre frdelas per medlemsstat, och arbetet som gller samarbetets rttsliga instrument br slutfras och rekommendationerna genomfras. INLEDNING Bakgrund 1.
The CI was renewed for the period 1994 to 1999 (Interreg II) and again for 2000 to 2006 (Interreg III). 
Interreg frnyades fr perioderna 1994Đ1999 (Interreg II) och 2000Đ2006 (Interreg III).
It seeks in particular to promote cooperation between regions in different Member States and is therefore at the heart of European integration. 2. 
Det frmsta syftet med initiativet r att frmja samarbete mellan omrden i olika medlemsstater och drmed str det mitt i den europeiska integrationsprocessen. 2.
There is an explicit reference to Interreg in the basic instrument establishing the Structural Funds (SFs) (2). 
Interreg nmns uttryckligen i strukturfondernas grundfrordning (2).
It is carried out at the initiative of the Commission, which adopts guidelines defining its aims, scope and method of implementation. 
Det genomfrs p initiativ av kommissionen som antar riktlinjer dr ml, tillmpningsomrde och genomfrandebestmmelser beskrivs.
The process linking the basic legislation to the end projects to be implemented by the beneficiaries of aid is shown in Table 1. 
I tabell 1 visas sambandet mellan grundfrordningen och de projekt som till sist genomfrs av stdmottagarna. 3.
(1) For example, environmental decisions (pollution, water resources, etc.) may be taken on one side of a border without allowing for the situation on the other side, infrastructure (roads, buildings, etc.) may be built without considering what needs exist just across the border, and transport networks may stop at border crossings or fail to be coordinated. 
Fr perioden 2000Đ2006 har 4 875 miljoner euro i tagandebemyndiganden avsatts till initiativet inom ramen fr std frn Europeiska utvecklingsfonden (ERUF), en av de fyra strukturfonderna, av ett totalt belopp p 10 432,5 miljoner euro som r (1) Till exempel kan beslut som gller miljn (frorening, vattenresurser) fattas p ena sidan av en grns utan hnsyn till situationen p den andra sidan, infrastrukturer (vgar, byggnader m.m.) kan byggas p ena sidan utan hnsyn till de behov som finns p den andra sidan och offentliga transportmedel kan upphra vid grnsen eller inte vara samordnade osv.
(2) Paragraph 38 of the preamble and Articles 20 and 21 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 
(2) Med beaktande av artikel 38 och artiklarna 20 och 21 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999 av den 21 juni 1999 om allmnna bestmmelser fr strukturfonderna (EGT L 161, 26.6.1999, s.
An overview of the utilisation of the available appropriations since the start of the period is given in Table 2. 4. 
I tabell 2 finns en versikt ver utnyttjandet av de tillgngliga anslagen sedan periodens brjan. 4.
The Court previously examined the Interreg CI at the end of its first implementation period (Interreg I) (4). 
Revisionsrtten granskade gemenskapsinitiativet Interreg redan i slutet av dess frsta genomfrandeperiod (Interreg I) (4).
The main conclusions highlighted: (a) the projectsŐ lack of a cross-border character and the absence of cross-border cooperation, inter alia, in the management of the Community Initiative programmes (CIPs); (b) the absence of indicators and the unsatisfactory nature of the assessment of the CIPsŐ impact; (c) delays in the adoption of the programmes by the Commission. 5. 
De viktigaste slutsatserna gllde fljande: a) Projekten saknar en grnsverskridande karaktr och ett grnsverskridande samarbete, ocks nr det gller frvaltningen av programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativet. b) Det finns inga indikatorer och utvrderingen av programmens effekt r bristfllig. c) Kommissionen antog programmen fr sent. 5.
At the end of the second implementation period (Interreg II), the Commission reported that the projectsŐ cross-border character, the ex ante evaluations and the systems of indicators needed to be improved (5). 
Efter den andra genomfrandeperioden (Interreg II) bedmde kommissionen att projektens grnsverskridande karaktr, frhandsbedmningen och systemen fr indikatorer behvde frbttras (5).
(3) PursuanttoArticle7ofRegulation(EC)No1260/1999,5,35%ofthe commitment appropriations from the Structural Funds for the period 2000 to 2006, or 195 000 million euro at 1999 prices, is allocated to the CIs (Interreg, Urban, Leader and Equal). 
(3) Enligt artikel 7 i frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999 gr 5,35 % av strukturfondernas tagandebemyndiganden fr perioden 2000Đ2006, vilka uppgr till 195 miljarder euro i 1999 rs priser, till finansieringen av gemenskapsinitiativen (Interreg, Urban, Leader och Equal).
Article 20 adds that 2,5 % of this 195 000 million euro is assigned to Interreg. 
Enligt artikel 20 tilldelas Interreg 2,5 % av detta belopp p 195 miljarder.
(4) Annual Report concerning the financial year 1994, paragraphs 4.61 to 4.72 and 4.89 (OJ C 303, 14.11.1995). 
(4) rsrapport fr budgetret 1994, punkterna 4.61Đ4.72 och 4.89 (EGT C 303, 14.11.1995).
(5) See ÔCommunity Initiative Interreg II 1994 to 1999: an initial evaluationŐ, January 2000, and ÔWorking paper 6 (5 May 2000) Đ Ex ante evaluation and indicators for Interreg (Strand A)Ő. 
(5) Se ÓCommunity Initiative Interreg II 1994Đ1999: an initial evaluationÓ, januari 2000 och arbetsdokument nr 6 (5 maj 2000), ÓEx ante evaluation and indicators for InterregÓ (del A).
Working paper 6 was expanded to include Strand B and reissued as working paper 7. 
Detta dokument utstrcktes till att ven glla del B i arbetsdokument nr 7.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/7 Main features of the Initiative for the period 2000 to 2006 6. 
7.12.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 303/7 Initiativets frmsta knnetecken under perioden 2000Đ2006 6.
Interreg III comprises three strands (1): Strand A covers cross-border cooperation between neighbouring regions (53 CIPs); Strand B covers transnational cooperation across large groupings of regions (13 CIPs); and Strand C covers interregional cooperation across the Community as a whole (four CIPs). 
Interreg III bestr av tre delar (1): del A gller grnsverskridande samarbete mellan angrnsande grnsomrden (53 program fr gemenskapsinitiativet), del B gller transnationellt samarbete inom stora grupperingar av europeiska regioner (13 program fr gemenskapsinitiativet) och del C interregionalt samarbete inom hela gemenskapen (fyra program fr gemenskaps-initiativet).
The main features of each Strand are shown in Table 3. 
De frmsta knnetecknen fr varje del beskrivs i tabell 3.
The Initiative is therefore no longer limited to cross-border cooperation, although this was the basis for its establishment in 1990. 
Initiativet r allts inte lngre begrnsat till det grnsverskridande samarbetet, som var grunden till att det inrttades 1990.
It has become a trans-European cooperation initiative (see glossary) (2). 7. 
Det har blivit ett initiativ fr transeuropeiskt samarbete (se ordlistan) (2). 7.
(1) Communication from the Commission to the Member States of 28 April 2000 laying down guidelines for a Community initiative concerning trans-European cooperation intended to encourage harmonious and balanced development of the European territory Đ Interreg III (OJ C 143, 23.5.2000, p. 
(1) Meddelande frn kommissionen till medlemsstaterna av den 28 april 2000 om faststllande av riktlinjer fr ett gemenskapsinitiativ fr transeuropeiskt samarbete som syftar till att stimulera en harmonisk och balanserad utveckling i Europa Đ Interreg III (EGT C 143, 23.5.2000, s.
6) and Communication from the Commission to the Member States of 7 May 2001 Đ ÔInterregional cooperationŐ Đ Strand C of the Interreg III Community Initiative (OJ C 141, 15.5.2001, p. 
6) och meddelande frn kommissionen till medlemsstaterna av den 7 maj 2001 ÓInterregionalt samarbeteÓ Đ Del C av gemenskapsinitiativet Interreg III (EGT C 141, 15.5.2001, s.
(2) Although regions from the accession States and third countries are partners in a number of Interreg CIPs (see the titles of some CIPs on map 1, the hatched regions of map 2 and some regions and countries on map 3), they do not receive funding under the CI. 
(2) ven om vissa regioner i kandidatlnder som skall ansluta sig till EU och tredjeland deltar i genomfrandet av vissa Interreg-program (se benmningen p vissa program p karta 1, de uppstyckade omrdena p karta 2 och vissa omrden eller lnder p karta 3) fr de inget finansiellt std inom ramen fr gemenskapsinitiativet.
The assistance from which they benefit derives from Community instruments other than the SFs. 
Det std som de fr hrrr frn andra gemenskapsinstrument n strukturfonderna.
(3) Previously, each of the Member States involved in a CIP designated a separate implementing body and different final beneficiaries. 
(3) Tidigare utsgs ett separat genomfrandeorgan och olika slutmottagare fr varje medlemsstat som medverkade i ett program.
(4) Previously, each CIP had as many financial plans and bank accounts receiving Community payments as there were Member States involved. 
(4) Tidigare hade varje program lika mnga finansieringsplaner och bankkonton dr gemenskapsbetalningar sattes in som medlemsstater som deltog i programmet.
This ÔpoolingŐ of the implementing bodies and financial elements should in principle encourage the emergence of a common strategy and approach for the area concerned. 
Att genomfrandeorganen och finansieringsdelarna r gemensamma br i princip gynna framvxten av en gemensam strategi och ett gemensamt arbetsstt fr det berrda omrdet.
It could also simplify the CommissionŐs management of CIPs, since hitherto the Commission had to handle as many representatives and payment requests as there were Member States involved in each programme. 
Dessutom kan detta underltta kommissionens frvaltning av programmen d man tidigare tvingades behandla lika mnga partner och anskningar som antalet inblandade medlemsstater i varje program.
The new guidelines also introduce the need for enhanced complementarity with other SF interventions. Moreover, in the interests of simplification, Interreg has now been assigned exclusively to the ERDF. 
I och med de nya riktlinjerna infrs dessutom kravet att initiativet skall komplettera strukturfondernas vriga stdtgrder, och fr enkelhetens skull handlggs Interreg nu enbart av ERUF.
The CourtŐs audit 10. 
Revisionsrttens granskning 10.
In view of the importance of the Initiative (see paragraph 3) , the difficulties that were detected (see paragraphs 4 and 5) and the substantial changes that were made for the period 2000 to 2006 (see paragraph 7), the Court resolved to audit the programming of Interreg III. 
Med hnsyn till initiativets storlek (se punkt 3), de svrigheter som konstaterats (se punkterna 4 och 5) och de vsentliga frndringar som infrts fr perioden 2000Đ2006 (se punkt 7) granskade revisionsrtten programplaneringen fr Interreg III.
Its objective was to answer the following questions and examine what follow-up had been given to the observations made by the Court in the course of its first audit (see paragraph 4): (a) Do the guidelines make it easier to achieve the CI objectives? (b) Did the Commission use a suitable procedure for examining CIP proposals, and were decisions taken within the agreed deadlines? (c) Did the various partners cooperate as required by the guidelines? (d) Was the initial analysis for the region concerned consistent with the priorities and measures of the CIPs, as required by the guidelines? (e) Will it be possible to measure, ex post, the progress achieved? 
Mlet var att besvara fljande frgor och samtidigt underska de uppfljningar som gjorts efter revisionsrttens iakttagelser vid den frsta granskningen (se punkt 4): a) Bidrar riktlinjerna till att gemenskapsinitiativets ml uppns lttare? b) Anvnde kommissionen ett lmpligt frfarande nr den underskte programfrslagen och fattades besluten inom de faststllda tidsfristerna? c) Samarbetar de olika parterna i enlighet med riktlinjerna? d) Finns det ett samband mellan den grundlggande analysen fr det berrda omrdet och prioriteringarna och tgrderna fr motsvarande program fr gemenskapsinitiativet, ssom freskrivs i riktlinjerna? e) Kommer det att bli mjligt att i efterhand mta de framsteg som gjorts?
The first two questions were examined at the level of the Commission, and the remaining three at Member State level. Eight CIPs were selected so as to form a representative sample of the situations encountered, i.e. of each of the strands set out in the Commission guidelines, and of a variety of contexts (see Table 4). 
De tv frsta frgorna granskades p kommissions-niv, medan de tre fljande granskades p medlemsstatsniv. tta program fr gemenskapsinitiativet valdes ut fr att man skulle ha ett urval av olika situationer som uppstod, dvs. de olika delarna som anges i kommissionens riktlinjer och olika sammanhang (se tabell 4).
These CIPs account for 20 % of the budgetary envelope allocated to the Initiative. 
De utgr 20 % av initiativets budgetanslag.
The audit was not concerned with matters connected with cooperation at external borders, which constitute a separate case, especially as regards coordination with other financial instruments (5). 
Granskningen omfattade inte de aspekter som gller samarbetet vid de yttre grnserna eftersom dessa r specifika, srskilt nr det gller samordningen med vriga finansiella instrument (5).
(5) See the Annual Report concerning the financial year 2002, paragraphs 7.46 to 7.59 (Tacis cross-border cooperation programme) and 8.51 to 8.57 (Phare cross-border cooperation programme) (OJ C 286, 28.11.2003). 
(5) Se rsrapporten fr budgetret 2002, punkterna 7.46Đ7.59 (program fr grnsverskridande samarbete, Tacis) och 8.51Đ8.57 (program fr grnsverskridande samarbete, Phare) (EUT C 286, 28.11.2003).
C 303/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 THE COMMISSION GUIDELINES 12. 
C 303/8 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 7.12.2004 KOMMISSIONENS RIKTLINJER 12.
The purpose is to establish conditions aimed at ensuring added value vis--vis the traditional measures applied under Objectives 1 and 2 (see glossary). 
Kommissionen utarbetar riktlinjer fr ett gemenskapsinitiativ som klargr de villkor som skall garantera ett mervrde i frhllande till traditionella stdinsatser inom ml 1 och ml 2 (se ordlistan).
In the CourtŐs view, the guidelines should lay down desiderata concerning the projects to be implemented by beneficiaries, as well as operational rules specific to the CIPs, and define the eligible areas. 
Revisionsrtten anser att riktlinjerna br innehlla srskilda krav fr projekt som skall genomfras av stdmottagarna, srskilda tillmpningsfreskrifter fr programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativet och de stdberttigade omrdena.
If the guidelines are to be sufficiently taken into account, it is crucial that they be made available before the work of preparing CIPs gets under way. 
Om riktlinjerna skall kunna beaktas p ett tillfredsstllande stt r det viktigt att de grs tillgngliga innan programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativet brjar utarbetas.
Do the guidelines contain an adequate definition of trans-European projects? 
Finns det en lmplig definition av begreppet transeuropeiskt projekt i riktlinjerna?
The Commission guidelines define trans-European projects (1) in terms of their implementation and impact: operations must be Ôselected jointly and implemented, either in two or more countries or third countries, or in a single Member State, where it can be shown that the operation has a significant impact on other Member States or third countriesŐ (2). 
I riktlinjerna definierar kommissionen det transeuropeiska projektet (1) i frhllande till genomfrandet och effekten av det: tgrderna Óhar valts ut gemensamt och genomfrs antingen i tv eller flera medlemsstater eller icke-medlemslnder, eller i en enda medlemsstat om det kan visas att verksamheten har en ptaglig effekt p andra medlemsstater eller icke-medlemslnderÓ (2).
The guidelines also stipulate that all measures and projects must demonstrate the added value of a trans-European approach. 
I riktlinjerna klargrs det ocks att man mste pvisa det mervrde som det transeuropeiska sttet att arbeta tillfr nr det gller alla tgrder och projekt.
It is therefore important at the level of each CIP to put the definition of trans-European projects into practice and ensure that projects contribute to the resolution of problems caused by the existence of a border (see paragraphs 66 to 69). Do the guidelines include specific implementing rules? 
Drfr r det viktigt att definitionen av det transeuropeiska projektet r anvndbar i praktiken inom varje program fr gemenskapsinitiativet och man br frskra sig om att projekten bidrar till att lsa de problem som beror p att det finns grnser (se punkterna 66Đ69).
Various recommendations concerning implementation were formulated at the time of the ex post evaluation of Interreg I, which was carried out at the CommissionŐs request. 
Olika rekommendationer i frga om genomfrandet framfrdes redan i utvrderingen i efterhand av Interreg I som genomfrdes p kommissionens begran.
Subsequently, the ÔLinkage Assistance and Cooperation for the European Border RegionsŐ (LACE) project (3) drew up a typology of Interreg II (1) AgenerictermusedforthethreestrandsoftheInitiative:cross-border cooperation (Strand A), transnational cooperation (Strand B) and interregional cooperation (Strand C). 
Efter det utarbetades inom ramen fr projektet Linkage Assistance and Cooperation for the European border regions (LACE, samarbete mellan grnsomrden i Europa) (3) ett typsystem fr Interreg II-programmen som (1) Term som hela tiden terkommer nr det gller initiativets tre delar: grnsverskridande samarbete (del A), transnationellt samarbete (del B) och interregionalt samarbete (del C).
(2) Paragraph 7 of the Communication to the Member States of 28 April 2000. 
(2) Punkt 7 i meddelandet till medlemsstaterna av den 28 april 2000.
(3) Ex post evaluation of the Interreg I cross-border CIPs for 1989 to 1993, which was carried out by FERE Consultants in August 1996. 
(3) Utvrderingen i efterhand av grnsverskridande program 1989Đ1993, utvrdering av initiativet Interreg I, utfrd av konsultby-rn Fre Consultants, augusti 1996.
The ÔÔLinkage Assistance and Cooperation for the European Border RegionsŐ (LACE) project was run by the Association of European Border Regions (AEBR). 
Projektet ÓLinkage Assistance and Cooperation for the European border regionsÓ (LACE, samarbete mellan grnsomrden i Europa) utfrdes av ÓAssociation of European Border RegionsÓ (AEBR, sammanslutningen fr europeiska grnsregio-ner).
This body, which was set up in 1971 with the aim of representing European cross-border regions, has almost 80 members in 160 zones adjacent to the European UnionŐs internal and external borders. 
AEBR bildades 1971 med mlet att fretrda grnsregioner i Europa. Sammanslutningen har nrmare ttio medlemmar som tcker 160 grnsregioner vid Europeiska unionens inre och yttre grnser.
Documents that it has produced address the following subjects: cross-border cooperation on maritime borders (June 1998), institutional aspects of cross-border cooperation (March 1999) and programme management models for Interreg IIIA (November 1999). 
Den har bland annat utarbetat dokument som gller fljande omrden: grnsverskridande samarbete vid sjgrnser (juni 1998), institutionella aspekter av det grnsverskridande arbetet (mars 1999), modeller fr frvaltningsprogram fr Interreg IIIA (november 1999).
Other documents, published after the guidelines were prepared, concern cross-border financial management (January 2000) and operational guidance on the preparation and management of Interreg IIIA programmes (June 2000). CIPs on the basis of the methods used for implementing programmes, emphasis being placed on the most integrated practices. 
Andra dokument, som offentliggjordes efter att riktlinjerna hade utarbetats, gller fljande: grnsverskridande ekonomisk frvaltning (januari 2000) och operativt strategidokument fr utarbetande och frvaltning av Interreg IIIA-program (2000Đ2006) (juni 2000). bygger p metoderna fr att genomfra programmen dr tonvikten ligger p de mest integrerade metoderna.
The recommendations, which are taken up by the guidelines (see paragraph 7), included the following: (a) that all sectors, including the private and non-commercial sectors, participate as much as possible and from as early as the CIP preparation stage; (b) that preparation and management be centralised, preferably at a permanent cross-border organisation. 
Rekommendationerna, som terspeglas i riktlinjerna (se punkt 7), gllde fljande: a) En s stor medverkan som mjligt frn alla sektorer, inklusive de privata och icke-kommersiella sektorerna, redan vid utarbetandet av varje program fr gemenskapsinitiativet. b) Gemensamt utarbetande och gemensam frvaltning, helst vid en permanent grnsverskridande organisation.
The Commission was therefore to encourage the establishment of permanent cross-border bodies and prepare model interregional agreements; (c) that a single bank account be used to receive Community funds. 
Kommissionen mste i det syftet uppmuntra att det bildas permanenta grnsverskridande strukturer och ta fram interregionala modellavtal. c) Ett enda bankkonto skall anvndas till gemenskapsmedlen.
National funds could also be paid into this account; (d) that each aid contract be concluded with a single partner, into whose account payment would be made. 
Nationella medel kan ocks sttas in p detta konto. d) Varje stdkontrakt skall ings med en enda partner och stdet skall sttas in p dennes konto.
This beneficiary should have its own contractual arrangements with partners on both sides of the border. 
Stdmottagaren br teckna egna kontrakt med partner p bda sidor om grnsen.
The guidelines provide for the establishment of European Economic Interest Groupings (EEIGs Đ see glossary) in order to ensure that the bodies implementing cooperation are genuinely shared. 
I riktlinjerna anges att man skall upprtta europeiska ekonomiska intressegrupperingar (EEIG) (se ordlistan) fr att samarbetet skall kunna ske genom verkligt gemensamma strukturer.