natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE INITIAL ANALYSIS AND CHOICE OF MEASURES AND THE ADDED VALUE OF THE FIRST PROJECTS TO BE ADOPTED 52. The Commission would refer to methodology working document No 2 ÔEx ante evaluation of Structural Fund operationsŐ which recommends an independent and objective evaluation, underlines the principle of proportionality, advocates an interactive link between ex ante evaluation and preparation of the strategy and proposes that the work of the evaluators be transmitted to the Commission either as an annex or as a document or series of separate documents. 
I riktlinjerna anges i punkterna 22 och 23 att program som avser grnsregionalt samarbete skall utarbetas av de regionala eller lokala myndigheterna i partnerskap med de nationella myndigheterna medan program som avser transnationellt samarbete skall utarbetas av de nationella myndigheterna i nra samarbete med de regionala eller lokala myndigheterna. VERENSSTMMER GRUNDANALYSEN OCH VAL AV TGRDER OCH MERVRDET I DE F RSTA PROJEKT SOM ANTAGITS? 52. Kommissionen hnvisar till sitt arbetsdokument nr 2, ÓFrhandsbedmning av strukturfondernas tgrderÓ, dr den rekommenderar en oberoende och objektiv utvrdering, framhller proportionalitetsprincipen och fresprkar en interaktiv frbindelse mellan frhandsbedmningen och strategiutvecklingen.
The cooperation projects managed as ERDF innovative actions were completed at the end of 2002, i.e. after strand C was launched. Although there was no external evaluation of these projects, the experience acquired helped the secretariats responsible for implementing the CIPs of this strand. COOPERATION IMPLEMENTATION DURING PREPARATION AND 41. 
De samarbetsprojekt som frvaltades i form av nyskapande tgrder inom ERUF avslutades i slutet av 2002, dvs. efter att del C pbrjats. ven om dessa projekt inte har varit freml fr ngon extern bedmning har de erfarenheter som vunnits varit till nytta fr de sekretariat som har ansvaret fr att genomfra programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativet inom denna del.
The Commission would refer to its replies to paragraphs 59 to 63. 44. An attempt was made in the north-west Region Interreg III B programme to set up a transnational association in the form of a European Economic Interest Grouping to host the managing authority and the joint technical secretariat of the programme. 
Kommissionen punkterna 59Đ63. hnvisar till sina svar p 44. Inom North-West Region Interreg III B-programmet gjordes ett frsk att skapa en transnationell sammanslutning i form av en europeisk ekonomisk intressegruppering som skulle fungera som vrdstruktur fr programmets frvaltningsmyndighet och gemensamma tekniska sekretariat.
However, it was found during the negotiations that not all Member States provide for this type of institution with public responsibilities in their legislative systems. 
Det visade sig emellertid under frhandlingarna att inte alla medlemsstater har bestmmelser om den hr typen av institutioner med offentligt ansvar i sina rttssystem.
Concerning a possible new legal instrument for cooperation in the new period, the Commission refers to its reply to at point 16. 
Avseende ett eventuellt nytt rttsligt instrument fr samarbete under den nya perioden hnvisar kommissionen till sitt svar angende punkt 16.
The guidelines state that the joint technical secretariat should assist the managing authority with the implementation and operational management of the programmes. 
Det gemensamma tekniska sekretariatet skall enligt riktlinjerna bist frvaltningsmyndigheten med genomfrandet och den operationella frvaltningen av programmen.
Emphasis is placed on effectiveness and operational aspects, while the strategic aspects are left to the managing authority and the monitoring committee. 
Tyngdpunkten lggs p effektiviteten och de operationella aspekterna, medan de strategiska aspekterna r frbehllna frvaltningsmyndigheten och vervakningskommittn.
For this reason, a JTS set up in a single location and consisting of representatives of the Member States concerned is, as a rule, better adapted to the guidelines. 
Ur denna synvinkel stmmer ett gemensamt tekniskt sekretariat som inrttas p en plats och samlar personer frn olika berrda medlemsstater i regel bttre verens med riktlinjerna.
In the guidelines the Commission had suggested that the system of financial management should allow a transfer from the ERDF, but preferably also national co-financing (point 25 of the guidelines). 
I sina riktlinjer freslog kommissionen att det finansiella frvaltningssystemet skulle mjliggra verfring frn ERUF men helst ocks frn respektive nationella medfinansieringsorgan (punkt 25 i riktlinjerna).
57. effectiveness of regional development policies and instruments, the Commission believes that it is for the decentralised public authorities to identify areas of cooperation. 
56. a) b) 57. och instrument fr regional utveckling och sammanhllning anser kommissionen att det r de decentraliserade myndigheternas uppgift att identifiera samarbetsomrdena.
It is quite right that descriptions should present development-related problems, because the main problem created by borders is that of the inadequate intensity of economic and social relations between neighbouring actors, which is an obstacle to development. 
I beskrivningarna behandlas med rtta utvecklingsproblem, eftersom det strsta problem som grnserna skapar r alltfr svaga ekonomiska och sociala frbindelser mellan aktrerna p mse sidor, vilket hmmar utvecklingen.
This is a tricky problem which takes time to resolve, as it involves developing cooperation between administrations and organisations of all kinds on both sides of the border. 
Det r ett svrt problem som det kommer att ta lng tid att lsa eftersom det krver en frstrkning av samarbetet mellan frvaltningar och organisationer p bda sidor av grnsen.
On this point see the reply to paragraph 17. (b) The examples show the differences in cooperation needs between different programmes. 
Se vidare svaret p punkt 17. b) Exemplen visar hur samarbetet varierar frn program till program.
They also confirm the CommissionŐs opinion that regions should have considerable scope to choose for themselves the types of cooperation they find most urgent. 
Exemplen bekrftar ocks kommissionens tes att regionerna br ges utrymme att sjlva vlja vilken typ av samarbete de tycker r lmpligast.
It is true that the bottom-up approach, which the Commission considers essential in regional development, is potentially at odds with the principle of concentrating financial resources Ôon a limited number of topics and measuresŐ (point 11 of the guidelines). 
Det r riktigt att den bottom-up-strategi som kommissionen anser s viktig fr regionalutvecklingen riskerar att hamna i konflikt med principen om att de finansiella medlen mste koncentreras Ótill ett begrnsat antal mnen och tgrderÓ (punkt 11 i riktlinjerna).
In particular, for programmes where there is long experience of cooperation and a limited development gap (at old internal bor-ders), the tendency is to cover a large number of topics in order to take cooperation further, rather than concentrate on a limited number of topics. 
I synnerhet inom de program som bygger p lng erfarenhet av samarbete och bara har en mindre efterslpning i utvecklingen (vid de gamla inre grnserna) finns det en tendens till att strka samarbetet p en lng rad omrden i stllet fr att koncentrera det p ett mindre antal omrden.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/33 60. 
7.12.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 303/33 60.
The strand A Interreg programmes differ from traditional operation programmes in that they are directed at cooperation and use rather innovative mechanisms to achieve this goal. 
Interreg-programmen under del A skiljer sig frn de traditionella tgrdsprogrammen eftersom de alltid r inriktade p samarbete och utnyttjar relativt nyskapande ordningar fr att n detta ml.
In view of the problems facing these areas as set out in paragraphs 17, 21, 22 and 58, it is normal that the topics covered should be the same as in traditional programmes. 
I den problematik som r frbunden med de regioner som diskuteras i punkterna 17, 21Đ22 och 58, r det fr vrigt normalt att man hittar samma omrden som i de traditionella programmen.
What distinguishes strand B from strand A is that those who devised these programmes followed the recommendations of the ESDP to structure their cooperation. 
Anledningen till att tgrderna i del B r mer specifika n i del A r att programmen r utformade p grundval av ESDP:s rekommendationer om hur samarbetet br struktureras.
As a result virtually all the strand B CIPs have a structure related to the ESDP priorities, namely polycentric spatial development and a new urban-rural relationship, clarity of access to infrastructure and knowledge and wise management of the natural and cultural heritage. 
Drfr har nstan alla program fr gemenskapsinitiativet under del B en struktur som stmmer verens med ESDP:s omrden, dvs. decentraliserad utveckling, frbindelserna mellan stad och landsbygd, lika tillgng till infrastrukturer fr kommunikation och kunskap samt frsiktig frvaltning av natur och kulturarv.
The Commission does, however, acknowledge that some of these CIPs could have been more targeted, but this is not always possible in trans-national partnership. 
Kommissionen erknner dock att ngra av dessa program fr gemenskapsinitiativet med frdel hade kunnat vara mer mlinriktade, vilket inte alltid r mjligt nr det gller transnationella partnerskap.
The Commission would refer to its reply to paragraph 57. 
Kommissionen hnvisar till svaret p punkt 57.
There are at least four reasons why strategy and priorities do not flow solely from the SWOT analyses: 1. the territories concerned do not come under a single public authority; 2. the statistics do not relate to all the territories concerned; 3. as the major problem is the weakness of cooperation links as explained in paragraph 17, the best way of identifying what steps needs to be taken is by a bottom-up approach; 4. the programmes are the outcome of a negotiation process between partners in different Member States trying to find a consensus. The Commission considers that, for the four reasons given above, for cross-border CIPs a bottom-up approach gives better results. 
Strategin och prioriteringarna kan inte faststllas endast p grundval av SWOT-analyser och det finns minst fyra orsaker till detta: 1) de berrda territorierna lyder inte under en och samma offentliga myndighet, 2) de statistiska uppgifterna avser inte de berrda territoriernas hela territorium, 3) eftersom det strsta problemet, som anges i punkt 17, var de bristande sam-arbetsbanden r den bsta metoden fr att faststlla vad som behver gras en bottom-up-strategi, och 4) programmen r resultatet av frhandlingar mellan partner i olika medlemsstater som frsker n konsensus.
This inevitably means less targeting than with a top-down approach, but it must still take into account programme strategy and priorities. 
En sdan strategi r med ndvndighet mindre mlinriktad n en strategi som genomfrs uppifrn och ner, men ven en sdan bottom-down-strategi mste ta hnsyn till programmets strategi och prioriteringar.
The steps referred to at 3 and 4 should be explained in the CIPs and integrated in the SWOT analysis. 
De faktorer som nmns i punkterna 3 och 4 br utvecklas i de grnsverskridande programmen och ing i SWOT-analysen.
Finally, in the field of cross-border cooperation, even with more targeting the problems connected with borders would not all be resolved, some of them (e.g. differences between taxation and social security systems) are outside the scope of the ERDF or can only be addressed in part (e.g. judicial and administrative cooperation Ń See Annex II, point 7). 
Mer mlinriktade insatser nr det gller det grnsverskridande samarbetet skulle inte lsa alla problemen, d vissa av problem-omrdena (som t.ex. skillnaderna i beskattnings-och socialfrsk-ringssystem) inte ingr i ERUF:s behrighetsomrde och det p vissa omrden endast kan vidtas tgrder avseende vissa delar av ett problem (som t.ex. det juridiska och administrativa samarbetet Đ se punkt 7 i bilaga II).
As regards transnational CIPs, the Commission can go along with the CourtŐs analysis and its criticism of inadequate targeting. 
Nr det gller de grnsverskridande programmen instmmer kommissionen i revisionsrttens analys och kritik mot den bristande mlinriktningen.
The Member States concerned were, in some areas, not sufficiently involved in identifying projects which genuinely created structures for the territories concerned. 
De berrda medlemsstaterna har inte alltid engagerat sig tillrckligt fr att finna projekt som r tillrckligt strukturskapande fr de aktuella territorierna.
In future consideration should be given, for this strand, to developing more top-down working methods involving national administrations. 
I framtiden br man utveckla mer toppstyrda arbetsmetoder som ven inbegriper de nationella myndigheterna.
Complementarity lies principally in the cross-border cooperation aspect which comes on top of the traditional and economic and social development. 
Det r framfr allt det grnsverskridande samarbetet som fungerar som komplement till den klassiska ekonomiska och sociala utvecklingen.
For instance, two border regions will include the financing of business support in their regional programmes and, by way of complement, the exchange of experience in financing such services in Interreg. 
Exempelvis kan tv grnsregioners regionala program inbegripa finansiering av tjnster till fretag och Interreg-programmen kan inbegripa kompletterande tgrder fr utbyte av erfarenheter kring finansiering av sdana tjnster.
For strand B, complementarity is achieved in that the CIPs finance transnational projects which are too complex for mainstream financing. 
Nr det gller del B skras komplementaspekten genom att de grnsverskridande programmen finansierar transnationella projekt som r s komplicerade till sin natur att de inte kan finansieras p gngse vis.
The selection committee must be in a position to base its decisions on its appraisal of the quality of the projects, as it is possible, with the quantified criteria, to quickly identify the strengths and weaknesses of each project and to discuss them in the steering committee. 
Urvalskommittn br kunna motivera sina beslut med hjlp av den bedmning av projektens kvalitet som grs, eftersom de kvantitativa kriterierna gr det mjligt att snabbt identifiera ett projekts starka och svaga punkter och dessa drefter diskuteras i styrkommittn.
The Commission agrees with the Court that defining minimum quality would improve the selection system for certain programmes. 
Kommissionen instmmer i revisionsrttens ppekande om att urvalssystemet skulle frbttras om det faststlls ett minimikvalitetskrav.
The trans-European nature of projects is one of the principal requirements of the guidelines. 
Att projekten har en transeuropeisk karaktr r ett av de viktigaste kraven i riktlinjerna.
The Court is quite right in underlining that some strand A projects financed by Interreg are not carried out jointly by partners on both sides of a border. 
Revisionsrtten ppekar med rtta att vissa av de projekt som ingr i del A och som finansierats av Interreg inte genomfrts gemensamt av partner p bda sidorna av en grns.
This is authorised by the guidelines where significant impact can be demonstrated on the other side of the border. 
Enligt riktlinjerna r detta tilltet i de fall d det kan bevisas att verksamheten har en ptaglig effekt p andra sidan grnsen.
The Commission considers that exchange of experience is a way for the bodies involved in these exchanges to improve their know-how. 
Kommissionen anser att erfarenhetsutbyte r ett stt att ka kunskaperna hos de organ som deltar i utbytet.
In some cases they may then be in a position to carry out more effectively local development actions financed, for instance, under mainstream or Interreg financed cross-border programmes. 
I vissa fall kan organen efter att de deltagit i erfarenhetsutbytet med strre framgng genomfra t.ex. tgrder fr lokal utveckling som finansieras p gngse stt eller grnsverskridande tgrder som finansieras via Interreg.
This applies to improvement in business support and the prevention of coastal erosion. 
Detta gller bland annat frbttring av tjnster till fretag och bekmpningen av kusterosion.
The Commission believes that projects for the exchange of experience are often a prerequisite for the development of innovative action and better use of public funds. 
Kommissionen menar att projekt fr erfarenhetsutbyte ofta fungerar som ett incitament till innovativa tgrder och till ett bttre utnyttjande av offentliga medel.
As regards the observation on the lack of targeting, the Commission would refer to its reply to paragraph 63. 
Angende ppekandet om bristande mlinriktning hnvisar kommissionen till sitt svar angende punkt 63.
As explained in the reply to paragraph 63, the bottom-up approach means taking into account the opinions of partners in determining objectives and not only the SWOT analysis. 
Som anges i svaret angende punkt 63 innebr en bottom-up-strategi att man ven mste ta hnsyn till partnernas sikter och inte bara till SWOT-analysen.
In addition, the general objective of cross-border CIPs of developing cooperation between administrations and organisations of all kinds on both sides of the border (see paragraph 63) and the intangible nature of a good many of the activities chosen make it difficult to quantify exactly the impact of the operation (see paragraphs 21 and 22). 
Samtidigt innebr det faktum att det allmnna mlet fr de grnsverskridande programmen r att skapa samarbete mellan alla former av frvaltningar och organisationer p bda sidorna om en grns (se punkt 63) och det faktum att mnga av verksamheterna r av immateriellt slag att det r svrt att med exakthet kvantifiera en tgrds resultat (se punkterna 21 och 22).
C 303/34 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 73. 
C 303/34 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 7.12.2004 73.
Commission staff are in the process of analysing in detail the mid-term evaluation reports; this exercise will help to remedy the problems and shortcomings detected by the Court concerning the relevance of the indicators. 
Den grundliga genomgng av halvtidsrapporterna som kommissionen hller p med kommer att bidra till att man kan tgrda de problem och brister nr det gller indikatorerna som revisionsrtten identifierat.
What the Commission has seen so far is that one point criticised in a good many reports is that project partners can each determine their own indicators; in its official reaction to the reports the Commission will recommend that project partners be required to use the indicators stipulated in the programming documents (programme and complement). 
I det nuvarande stadiet av genomgngen kan kommissionen konstatera att det i ett stort antal rapporter uttrycks kritik ver att varje projektledare kan faststlla sina egna indikatorer, och kommissionen kommer i sin officiella rapport om genomgngen att rekommendera att projektledarna lggs att flja indikatorer som anges i programplaneringsdokumenten (program och programkomplement).
The lack of accuracy of the measurement of impact is mainly due to the intangible nature of the large number of activities financed. 
Den inexakta bedmningen av effekten beror huvudsakligen p det faktum att en stor del av de finansierade verksamheterna r av immateriell karaktr.
The context indicators proper serve to define the starting situation, giving a snapshot of the region to which reference can be made to see whether the programme has had any impact on this situation. 
Syftet med sammanhangsindikatorerna r att definiera utgngssituationen, dvs. en bild av regionen som man kan anvnda senare fr att se vilka resultat programmet gett.
It is true that these indicators are not necessarily influenced by the operation, and that their value as far as the programme is concerned can be limited. 
Det r sant att indikatorerna inte alltid pverkas av tgrderna och att de drfr kan vara av begrnsat intresse.
Many earlier Interreg evaluations found that impact objectives cannot be quantified if this starting situation is not known. 
I tidigare utvrderingar av Interreg har det konstaterats att resultaten inte kan berknas om inte utgngssituationen r knd.
The Commission notes that a first step has been taken, but that harmonious application to all the CIPs would have been of more use. 
Kommissionen konstaterar att ett frsta steg har tagits, men att en harmoniserad tillmpning fr samtliga grnsverskridande program hade varit nnu bttre.
As regards quantifiable indicators, i.e. of outputs and outcomes, as a rule it is the beneficiaries who state in their reports what has been achieved or, for some indicators, it is the joint secretariat. 
Nr det gller de kvantifierbara indikatorerna, dvs. resultatindikatorerna, r det oftast stdmottagarna som i sina slutrapporter anger vilka resultat som erhllits och nr det gller vissa indikatorer r det det gemensamma sekretariatet som anger resultatet.
The Commission urged Member States to select only a limited number of relevant indicators. 
Kommissionen har uppmanat medlemsstaterna att inte vlja ut mer n ett minimiantal relevanta kriterier.
It reminded Member States of this recommendation in the simplification exercise (Communication of 25 April 2003 (C(2003) 1255)). 
Medlemsstaterna har pmints om rekommendationen inom ramen fr frenklingsarbetet (kommissionens meddelande av den 25 april 2003 [K(2003) 1255]).
The Commission urged Member Stats to put in place computerised project management systems and databases to compile information for use as indicators. 
Kommissionen har uppmanat medlemsstaterna att inrtta datasystem fr frvaltningen av projekten och databaser fr insamling av uppgifter om indikatorerna.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 79. 
SLUTSATS OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 79.
The delays in the publication of guidelines and in the approval of programmes did not have any decisive effect on the quality of programmes (see replies to paragraphs 28, 29 and 36 to 39). 
Frseningarna nr det gller offentliggrandet av riktlinjerna och godknnande av programmen har inte pverkat programkvaliteten i ngon strre utstrckning (se svar angende punkterna 28Đ29 och 36Đ39).
The Commission guidelines have produced significant advances in the CIP management system compared with the previous period. 
Systemet fr frvaltning av de grnsverskridande programmen har avsevrt frbttrats tack vare kommissionens riktlinjer.
Further progress is expected on the basis of current experience and exchanges between management bodies under the Interact programme. 
Ytterligare frbttringar frvntas komma tack vare de erfarenheter som gjorts hittills och erfarenhetsutbytet mellan frvaltningsorgan inom Interact-programmet.
The Commission is also planning to propose that the Council should introduce for the next programming period a new legal instrument to facilitate the creation of joint structures. 
Kommissionen har vidare fr avsikt att infr nsta programperiod fresl rdet ett nytt rttsligt instrument fr att underltta skapandet av nya gemensamma strukturer.
On the matter of the analyses available, the Commission would refer to its replies to the observations in paragraph 18. 
Angende frgan om vilka analyser som stod till kommissionens frfogande hnvisar kommissionen till punkt 18.
As stated in paragraphs 17 and 58, the general objective of cross-border cooperation is the development of a cross-border economy by developing cross-border socio-economic centres out of the two economies separated by the border. 
Som anges i punkterna 17 och 58 r det allmnna mlet med grnsverskridande samarbete att utveckla en grnsverskridande ekonomi genom att det utifrn de ekonomier som finns p bda sidorna om grnsen skapas grnsverskridande socioekonomiska center.