natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Despite request, at the time of writing, the Italian authorities had not provided information on amounts recovered but not credited to the EAGGF relating to other measures managed by AIMA (3) (the responsible paying agency). 
Trots en begran om detta har de italienska myndigheterna nr denna rapport utarbetas inte tillhandahllit information om belopp som terbetalats men inte krediterats EUGFJ nr det gller andra tgrder som frvaltas av AIMA (3) (det ansvariga utbetalande organet).
A comparison with information received from the District Attorney for Bari, one of many district attorneys dealing with, inter alia, consumption aid cases, revealed a further two cases relating to the Bari region that could not be traced in AIMAŐs database of irregularities. 
En jmfrelse med information frn distriktsklagaren i Bari, som r en av mnga distriktsklagare som bland annat sysslar med fall rrande konsumtionsstd, avsljade ytterligare 2 fall som rrde Bari-regionen och som inte kunde spras i AIMA:s databas fr oriktigheter.
The AIMA database has now been updated to include the cases mentioned in the preceding paragraphs that were incorrectly omitted. 
AIMA:sdatabasharnuuppdateratssattdeninnehllerde fall som nmns i punkten ovan, som felaktigt hade utelmnats.
Given these discrepancies, however, the Court asked the Italian authorities to check the completeness of the final version of their account of amounts to be recovered against all irregularities recorded in the Guardia di Finanza database. 
Mot bakgrund av dessa fel bad dock revisionsrtten de italienska myndigheterna att kontrollera att den slutliga versionen av deras redovisning av belopp att terkrva angende alla oriktigheter somregistreratsiGuardiadiFinanzasdatabasvarfullstndig.
This check has not yet been completed. 
Denna kontroll har nnu inte avslutats.
The figure of ECU 403,6 million for amounts to be recovered arising from irregularities must still be regarded as incomplete. 
Beloppet 403,6 miljoner ecu fr belopp att terkrva som avser oriktigheter mste fortfarande anses vara ofullstndigt.
Delays in recovery General 101. 
Frseningar i terkraven Allmnt 101.
Recovery procedures in all Member States were characterised by long administrative and judicial delays. 
Frfarandena fr terkrav karakteriserades i alla medlemsstater av lnga administrativa och rttsliga handlggningstider.
National regulations quite rightly allowed individuals or undertakings to appeal against administrative decisions or court judgments affecting them but none of the Member States concerned had any procedures for deterring appeals which may subsequently prove to be either a delaying tactic or otherwise without serious justification (such as requiring the appellant to deposit the amount under appeal or provide an appropriate guarantee before the appeal could be heard). Appeals were lodged in the vast majority of cases examined by the Court. 
Nationella bestmmelser tillter helt riktigt att enskilda personer eller fretag verklagar administrativa beslut och domstolsdomar som berr dem men ingen av medlemsstaterna hade ngra frfaranden fr att avskrcka frn verklaganden som senare kan visa sig vara antingen frseningstaktik eller p annat stt sakna seris motivering (ssom krav p den klagande att deponera det belopp som verklagandet avser eller lmna en lmplig garanti innan verklagandet kan prvas). verklaganden inlmnades i de flesta av de fall som revisionsrtten underskte.
27.7.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 215/27 Italy 102. 
27.7.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 215/27 Italien 102.
Although concurrent civil recovery action was provided for by law (1), because most irregularities were treated as criminal cases, the civil claim was almost always inserted in the criminal proceedings and therefore recovery action was suspended until the final judgment had been passed in the relevant criminal case. 
Lpande civila terkravstgrder freskrevs i lag (1) men p grund av att de flesta oegentligheter behandlades som brottml inkluderades nstan alltid de civilrttsliga ansprken i talet, och drfr skts terkravstgrderna upp tills den slutliga domen hade utfrdats i det aktuella brottmlet.
As recognised by the Italian authorities, it could take more than 10 years before a definitive judgment was reached. 
Som de italienska myndigheterna medger kunde det ta mer n tio r innan en slutlig dom utfrdades (2).
(2) A contributory factor was the shortage of staff in the District AttorneysŐ officesasacknowledgedinareportoftheCortedeiConti(3). 
En bidragande orsak var personalbristen p distrikts-klagarkontoret vilket medgivits i en rapport frn Corte dei conti (3).
Table 11 shows the delays in open cases. 
Tabell 11 visar handlggningstiden fr oavslutade fall.
All reports of irregularities detected in Greece had to be submitted to a committee of the Ministry of Agriculture for a final decision as to whether or not recovery action was justified. 
Alla rapporter om oegentligheter som upptckts i Grekland mste hnvisas till en kommitt inom jordbruksministeriet fr ett slutligt beslut om huruvida det var befogat med terkravstgrder.
At the time of writing, this committee had given decisions in 129 cases. 
Nr denna rapport utarbetades hade denna kommitt beslutat om 129 fall.
In a further 80 cases decisions are still pending, 79 of which for more than four years. 
I ytterligare 80 fall har beslut nnu inte fattats, och av dessa har 79 varit anhngiga i mer n fyra r.
No information has been provided on the amounts involved. 
Inga uppgifter har lmnats om vilka belopp det handlar om.
The sums unduly paid had still not been recovered more than one year after the date of the decision in 93 of the 129 cases (4). 
Felaktigt utbetalda belopp hade fortfarande inte inkasserats mer n ett r efter datumet fr beslutet i 93 av de 129 fallen (4).
Spain 105. 
Spanien 105.
The Spanish paying agency, FEGA (5), provided information on1721casesinvolvingECU2,9millionoutofatotalofECU 10,1 million where recovery was pending as notified to the Com-missionasat31December1997.Thecasesdatedbackasfaras 1991. 
Det spanska utbetalande organet FEGA (5) lmnade information om 1 721 fall som omfattade 2,9 miljoner ecu av totalt 10,1 miljoner ecu dr belopp skulle terkrvas, enligt meddelande till kommissionen den 31 december 1997.
An analysis of the higher value cases (429 cases with a valueofECU2,7million)revealedthatmostdelayswereadmin-istrative and were attributable to the time taken to arrive at the definitive recovery decision, which, in over 60 % of the cases, was over five years. 
En analys av de fall som avser strre vrden (429 fall med ett vrde p 2,7 miljoner ecu) avsljade att de flesta frseningar var administrativa och berodde p den tid det tog att komma fram till det slutliga beslutet om terkrav, vilket i mer n 60 % av fallen var ver fem r.
Table 12 below details the delays. 
Tabell 12 nedan visar detaljerade uppgifter om frseningarna.
According to the CommissionŐs data as at 31 December 1998, Spain had recovered 84 % (ECU 9,1 million) of the amounts notified, compared with 6%(ECU668000)asat31December1997. 
Enligt kommissionens uppgifter per den 31 december 1998 hade Spanien inkasserat 84 % (9,1 miljoner ecu) av de anmlda beloppen, att jmfra med 6 % (668 000 ecu) per den 31 december 1997.
Table 11 Italy: Open cases Ń Delays from date of report of irregularity to 25.2.1999 Delay Less than 1 year 1 to 2 years 2 to 5 years 5 to 8 years 8 to 10 years Over 10 years Total No of cases 26 62 227 277 69 54 715 % 4 9 32 39 10 8 Amount to be recovered in % ecus 16 011 184 4 134 226 337 35 67 639 673 18 108 237 901 28 34 850 635 9 23 014 982 6 383 946 309 Table 12 Spain: Delays in recovery Source: AIMA. 
Tabell 12 Spanien: Handlggningstid fr terkrav Handlggningstid Mindre n 1 r 1till2r 62 Belopp att terkrva i ecu Antal fall % 4 9 32 39 10 8 % 16 011 184 4 26 134 226 337 67 639 673 18 108 237 901 28 34 850 635 9 23 014 982 6 383 946 309 35 2 till 5 r 5 till 8 r 8 till 10 r Mer n 10 r Totalt 227 277 69 54 715 Klla: AIMA.
AIMA, the paying agency responsible for recovery, normally only issued a ÔrequestŐ for the recovery of sums unduly paid to the beneficiary concerned. This request was not enforceable. 
AIMA, som r det utbetalande organ som ansvarar fr ter-kraven, utfrdade normalt bara en ÓbegranÓ om terbetalning av felaktigt utbetalda belopp till den berrda mottagaren. Denna begran kunde inte verkstllas.
Thebasisfortheenforcementofrecoveryactioninrespectofa debtwasaninjunctionoracourtjudgment.AIMAconsidered that, once a case had been referred to a district attorney, it was not required to take further action since it was the district attorneyŐs duty to initiate civil recovery action before the relevant court. 
Grunden fr tvngstgrder fr att terkrva en skuld var ett domstolsfrelggande eller ett domslut. AIMA ansg att det, nr ett ml vl hade verfrts till distrikts-klagaren, inte var ndvndigt att vidta ytterligare tgrder eftersom det var distriktsklagarens plikt att inleda civilt terkravsfr-farande i behrig domstol.
Fur-ther,itwasnotAIMAŐsnormalpracticetoissueinjunctions, because,itargued,injunctionscouldonlybeissuedonthebasis that Ôthe debt should be certain, quantified and enforceable, based upon written evidence that is to say based on a definitive court judgmentŐ. 
Vidare var det inte AIMA:s normala frfaringsstt att utfrda frelgganden eftersom man menade att frelgganden endast kunde utfrdas under frutsttning att skulden var sker, och kvantifierad och fick tvngsindrivas, samt baserades p skriftligt bevis, vilket den tolkar som ett slutligt dom-stolsavgrande.
(1) Nuovo Codice Di Procedura Penale Article 75. 
(1) Nuovo Codice Di Procedura Penale, artikel 75.
(2) See also Reports on the Administration of Justice (in Italy) during 1997 and 1998 by the Supreme Court of Cassation and the regional 3 Appeal Courts of Venice, Florence, Turin, Naples and Salerno. () See Report 71/98 of 27 March 1998 of the Italian Corte dei Conti on ÔSanctions in respect of Community aidŐ which reads that Ôthe task [of recovery of fines] is made all the more difficult by the fact that the District Attorneys now refuse to defend the Inspectorate [for the fight againstfraud]claimingthattheydonothaveenoughstaffŐ. 
(2) Se ven rapporter om rttskipning (i Italien) under 1997 och 1998 frn hgsta kassationsdomstolen och de regionala appellationsdom-3 stolarna i Venedig, Florens, Turin, Neapel och Salerno. () Se ven rapport 71/98 av den 27 mars 1998 frn den italienska Corte dei Conti om ÓPfljder nr det gller gemenskapsstdÓ, i vilken det str att uppgiften att driva in bter frsvras alltmer p grund av att distriktsklagarna nu vgrar att frsvara myndigheten fr bedrgeribekmpning med hnvisning till att de inte har tillrckligt mycket personal.
Delay less than 4 years 4 to 5 years 5 to 6 years More than 6 years Total No of cases % 52 12 103 24 237 55 37 9 429 100 Amount unduly % paid in ecus 357 676 13 506 360 18 1 496 562 55 377 100 14 2 737 699 100 Source: FEGA cases >ESP 100 000. 
Mindre n 4 r 4 till 5 r 5 till 6 r Mern6r 37 9 Handlggningstid Antal fall % Felaktigt utbetalt belopp % i ecu 357 676 13 506 360 18 1 496 562 55 377 100 14 2 737 699 100 52 12 103 24 237 55 Totalt 429 100 Klla: FEGA fall > ESP 100 000.
Portugal 106. 
Portugal 106.
In Portugal delays were noted both in the notification of control reports by the control agency to the paying agency and in taking the final decision on recovery action. 
I Portugal konstaterades frseningar bde nr det gllde kontrollorganens meddelande till det utbetalande organet om kontrollrapporter och nr det gllde det slutliga beslutet om terkravstgrder.
According to the CommissionŐs database, as at 31 December 1998, Portugal had recovered 89 % (ECU 1,2 million) of the amounts notified, compared with 20 % (ECU 260 000) at 31 December 1997. 
Enligt kommissionens databas hade Portugal per den 31 december 1998 inkasserat 89 % (1,2 miljoner ecu) av de belopp som meddelats, jmfrt med 20 % (260 000) per den 31 december 1997.
4 ( ) 5 ( ) The analysis in these paragraphs is based upon incomplete data supplied by the Greek authorities. 
4 ( ) 5 ( ) Analysen i dessa punkter baseras p ofullstndiga uppgifter frn de grekiska myndigheterna.
Fondo Espagnol de Garantia Agraria. 
Fondo Espaol de Garanta Agraria.
C 215/28 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27.7.2000 Monitoring the progress of criminal proceedings Italy 107. 
C 215/28 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 27.7.2000 vervakning av utvecklingen av rttsliga tgrder Italien 107.
AIMA did not systematically follow the progress of criminal cases and its own civil claim within them. 
AIMA har inte systematiskt fljt utvecklingen i brottmlen, eller sina egna civilrttsliga ansprk inom dessa.
The Avvocatura dello Stato, which was responsible for defending AIMAŐs (and therefore the CommunityŐs) interests, did not systematically report back to AIMA on the progress of the court cases and AIMA did not have a system for periodically obtaining updated information from the relevant district attorneys or Procura della Repubblica. 
Avvocatura dello Stato, som ansvarade fr att frsvara AIMA:s (och drmed gemen-skapens) intressen, rapporterade inte systematiskt tillbaka till AIMA om utvecklingen i brottmlen och AIMA hade inget system fr att regelbundet f aktuell information frn behrig distriktsklagare eller Procura della Repubblica.
Further, there was no system in force to ensure the timely communication of court decisions to AIMA. 
Dessutom fanns det inget system som skerstllde att domstolsbeslut meddelades AIMA i tid.
At the CourtŐs suggestion, AIMA wrote to the competent district attorneys (or, if not known, to the responsible reporting bodies) to establish the current situation of cases under their responsibility(1).Therepliesshowedthatitwasdifficulttoascer-tain from the judgments on the criminal cases whether or not it had been accepted that undue aid payments had been made and sometimes even to which civil case these payments related, since the names of the beneficiary companies were not always mentioned. 
P revisionsrttens uppmaning skrev AIMA till den behriga distriktsklagaren (eller om denna var oknd, till ansvariga rapporterande organ) fr att konstatera nulget fr de fall som AIMA hade ansvar fr (1). Svaren visade att det var svrt att utifrn domarna i brottmlen bedma huruvida man hade accepterat att felaktiga utbetalningar hade gjorts och ibland ven med vilket civilrttsligt ml betalningarna hrde samman, eftersom mottagarfretagens namn inte alltid nmndes.
The replies from the district attorneys further revealed 46 cases involving ECU 29 million where judgments had been made butAIMAhadnotpursuedrecoveryaction.Theoldestofthese judgments dated back to 1989. 
Svaren frn distriktsklagarna avsljade ocks 46 fall som omfattade 29 miljoner ecu dr domarna hade utfrdats men dr AIMA inte hade inlett terkravstgrder. Den ldsta av dessa domar var frn 1989.
AIMA is currently making further enquiries as to the exact status of these cases. 
AIMA genomfr fr nrvarande ytterligare underskningar av vad som skett i dessa fall.
Spain 110. 
Spanien 110.
Eleven cases involving some ECU 697 000 reported in 1996 and 1997 were still awaiting decisions on criminal proceedings and recovery action at the time of the last audit visit in November 1998 because of a dispute over competence between FEGA, the former paying agency, and the autonomous authorities who have latterly assumed this function. 
Fr 11 fall som omfattade ungefr 697 000 ecu och som rapporterats under 1996 och 1997 vntade man fortfarande p beslut om tal och terkravstgrder nr det senaste revisionsbesket gjordes i november 1998, p grund av en tvist rrande befogenheter mellan FEGA, det tidigare utbetalande organet, och de autonoma myndigheter som p senare tid har tagit ver denna uppgift.
(1) The replies showed, firstly that the defendants in any given criminal case may have been involved in more than one civil case liable to lead to recovery action and, secondly, that a given criminal case relating to only one civil case may have many defendants. 
(1) Svaren visade fr det frsta att svaranden i ett givet brottml kan ha varit inblandad i mer n ett civilml som kan leda till terkravstgr-der, och fr det andra att ett givet brottml rrande ett enda civilml kan ha mnga svarande.
The situation was further complicated by the fact that, often, in one single case of undue payments, some defendants were found guilty, some plea bargained, some were granted amnesties and some were acquitted. 
Situationen frsvrades ytterligare av att nr det gllde ett enda fall av felaktiga utbetalningar frklarades ofta ngra svarande skyldiga, ngra frhandlade om lindrigare straff vid erkn-nande,ngrabendadesochngrafrikndes.
Greece 111. 
Grekland 111.
Of 27 cases reported between 1991 and 1994 which should be the subject of court proceedings, there has been a definitive judgment in only one case. 
Av 27 fall som rapporterats mellan 1991 och 1994 och som borde behandlas i rttegngsfrhandlingar har slutlig dom utfrdats i endast ett fall.
In 12 of the remaining cases, proceedings have been commenced, five are under appeal and nine cases have yet to have legal proceedings initiated. 
I 12 av de vriga fallen har frhandlingar inletts, 5 har verklagats och fr 9 fall har frhandlingar nnu inte inletts.
Case where recovery action was taken against the supplier rather than the aid recipient 112. 
Fall dr terkravstgrd vidtagits mot leverantren i stllet fr mot stdmottagaren 112.
This case, detected in Italy, involved the falsification of customs documents to disguise the non-Community origin of a large quantity of oil, some of which was actually a blend of olive and hazelnutoil.Irregularconsumptionaidclaimswerenotmadeby the importer but by his customers. 
Detta fall, som upptcktes i Italien, omfattade frfalskning av tulldokument avseende en stor kvantitet olja fr att dlja att den inte hade sitt ursprung i gemenskapen; en del av denna olja var i sjlva verket en blandning av olivolja och hasselntsolja.
Recovery action, on the other hand, was initiated in the framework of the criminal case against theimporterbutnotagainstthecustomers(whohadactually made the irregular claims). 
Oriktiga anskningar om konsumtionsstd inlmnades inte av importren utan av hans kunder. terkravstgrden dremot inleddes inom ramen fr ett brottml mot importren och inte mot kunderna som faktiskt hade inlmnat de oriktiga anskning-arna).
The total value of payments to the aid applicants to which they are not entitled, and which they still have, was ECU 8,7 million. 
Det totala vrdet p utbetalningarna till dem som anskte om std, som de inte har rtt till och som de fortfarande har kvar, var 8,7 miljoner ecu.
At the time of writing, the criminal case was before the Court of Cassation, the importer was in liquidation but assets of ECU 22 million had been blocked. 
I skrivande stund befann sig brottmlet i kassationsdomstolen, importren hade trtt i likvidation men tillgngar till ett vrde av 22 miljoner ecu hade blockerats.
In order to protect the CommunityŐs financial interests in such cases, recovery action should be taken against the recipients of the aid. 
Fr att skydda gemenskapens ekonomiska intressen i sdana fall br terkravstgrden vidtas mot stdmottagaren.
Such action may be initiated independently of the criminalactionagainsttheimporter.Fraudulentbehaviourbya third party with whom the aid recipient has entered into a contract constitutes an ordinary commercial risk (2) that should not exclude repayment by the beneficiary. 
Dessa tgrder kan inledas oberoende av de straffrttsliga tgrder som vidtagits mot importren. Bedrgeri av tredje man som stdmottagaren str i ett avtalsfrhllande till utgr en sedvanlig handelsrisk (2) som inte br innebra att terbetalning frn mottagaren r utesluten.
Guarantees 114. 
Garantier 114.
Payments of consumption aid were made in advance of the on-the-spot checks carried out by the olive oil control agencies but were subject to the lodging of guarantees which were released once entitlement to aid had been recognised on the basis of the checks. 
Konsumtionsstd betalades ut fre de kontroller p platsen som kontrollorganen fr olivolja gjorde men dessa betalningar gjordes mot att skerheter lmnades vilka frigjordes s fort rtten till std hade erknts p grundval av kontrollerna.
In both Spain and Greece the guarantees were actually released on the basis of the results of a desk check which was necessarily limited in scope. 
I bde Spanien och Grekland frigjordes skerheterna i sjlva verket utifrn resultatet av ett skrivbordstest vilket med ndvndighet var av begrnsad omfattning.
This is contrary to the legislation, in force since 27 March 1993, which requires the recognition of entitlement to aid (and therefore the release of the guarantee) to be based on the results of the on-the-spot checks (3). 
Detta strider mot den lagstiftning som gller sedan den 27 mars 1993, enligt vilken faststllandet av rtten till std (och drmed frigrandet av skerheter) skall baseras p resultatet av kontrollerna p platsen (3).
2 () Case C-366/95, Steff-Houlberg Export e.a. [1998] ECR I-2661, para-3 graph 28. () Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2677/85, Article 11(2) (OJ L 254, 25.9.1985, as amended by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 643/ 93, OJ L 69, 20.3.1993, p. 
2 () Ml C-366/95, Steff-Houlberg Export m fl [1998] REG I-2661, 3 punkt 28. () Artikel 11.2 i kommissionens frordning (EEG) nr 2677/85, EGT L 254, 25.9.1985, ssom ndrad genom kommissionens frordning (EEG)nr643/93,EGTL69,20.3.1993,s.19Đ21.
27.7.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 215/29 Clearance of accounts 116. 
27.7.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 215/29 Avslutning av rkenskaperna 116.
Table 13 summarises these corrections by Member State. 
Tabell 13 r en sammanfattning av dessa justeringar per medlemsstat.
The corrections were mainly for shortcomings in the control system but there were also instances of corrections for failure to withdraw approval from certain undertakings that had made irregular claims. Withdrawal of approval results in loss of entitlement to consumption aid payments. 
Justeringarna avsg frmst brister i kontrollsystemet men det frekom ocks justeringar av fall dr man underltit att terta godknnande frn vissa fretag som hade lmnat in oriktiga anskningar. tertagande av godknnande innebr att rtten till konsumtionsstd gr frlorad.
Table 13 Clearance of accounts corrections for olive oil consumption aid However, a correction was still judged appropriate by the ECJ becauseitfoundthatÔInasmuchasittooktenyearstoresolve the jurisdictional dispute between the Italian authorities, and no effective monitoring was possible during that time, it is reasonable to presume that there were deficiencies entailing a risk of loss to the EAGGFŐ. 
Tabell 13 Justeringar vid avslutningen av rkenskaperna fr konsumtionsstd fr olivolja Domstolen ansg nd att en justering var berttigad eftersom den ansg att ÓEftersom det tog tio r att bilgga kompetenstvisten mellan de italienska myndigheterna och det under tiden inte var mjligt att freta ngra kontroller, r det rimligt att anta att det har frekommit luckor innebrande en risk fr frluster fr EUGFJÓ.