natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the Commission finds out that irregular expenditure was co‐financed or likely to be co‐financed, the Commission can intervene and correct already co‐financed expenditure or can prevent the future co‐financing of irregular expenditure in future statements of expenditure. 
Om kommissionen finner att oriktiga utgifter har medfinansierats eller sannolikt kommer att medfinansieras kan den ingripa och korrigera den redan medfinansierade utgiften eller frhindra en framtida medfinansiering av oriktiga utgifter i framtida utgiftsdeklarationer.
For the 2000‐2006 period, the regulations did not provide for interruptions as part of the Commission’s preventive measures. 
Fr perioden 2000Đ2006 angav frordningarna inte avbrott som en del av kommissionens frebyggande tgrder.
The Directorates‐General for Regional and Urban Policy and for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion are responsible for the application of these corrective measures in cohesion policy. 
Generaldirektoraten fr regional-och stadspolitik och fr sysselsttning, socialpolitik och inkludering ansvarar fr att genomfra sdana korrigeringstgrder inom sammanhllningspolitiken.
The Commission can apply preventive measures and/or financial corrections on the basis of irregularities or serious deficiencies identified by Member State authorities (e.g. the managing or audit authority) or on the basis of its own verifications and audits. 
Kommissionen kan tillmpa frebyggande tgrder och/eller gra finansiella korrigeringar p grundval av oriktigheter eller allvarliga brister som identifierats av medlemsstaternas myndigheter (dvs. frvaltningsmyndigheten eller revisionsmyndigheten) eller utifrn egna kontroller och revisioner.
They can also be the result of audits by the European Court of Auditors (see Annex I). 
De kan ocks vara en fljd av Europeiska revisionsrttens revisioner (se bilaga I).
4 5 6 7 16 Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, Articles 70 and 98 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 and Article 143 of Regulation (EU) 1303/2013. 
4 5 6 7 17 Artikel 30 i frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999, artiklarna 70 och 98 i frordning (EG) nr 1083/2006 och artikel 143 i frordning (EU) nr 1303/2013.
Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999. 
Artikel 39 i frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999.
Articles 91, 92 and 99 to 102 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Artiklarna 91, 92 och 99Đ102 i frordning (EG) nr 1083/2006.
Articles 83, 85, 142 and 144 to 147 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
Artiklarna 83, 85, 142 och 144Đ147 i frordning (EU) nr 1303/2013.
Preventive measures: payment interruptions and suspensions 14. 
Frebyggande tgrder: avbrott och innehllande av betalningar 14.
Preventive measures result in a deferral of payments from the EU budget. 
Frebyggande tgrder leder till att utbetalningar frn EU:s budget skjuts upp.
The main types of preventive measures are interruptions and suspensions (see Box 1). 
De huvudsakliga typerna av frebyggande tgrder r avbrott och innehllande av betalningar (se ruta 1).
Payment interruptions were introduced in the 2007‐2013 regulation (see Annex II). 
Betalningsavbrott infrdes i frordningen fr 2007Đ2013 (se bilaga II).
The main advantage of interruptions is that they can be applied immediately without a long administrative procedure if the Commission has evidence suggesting significant 8 9 10 11 17 Box 1 – Interruptions and suspensions of payments from the EU budget In principle, the Commission must make the payment to the Member State within two months of having received the payment claim. 
Den strsta frdelen med avbrott r att de kan tillmpas omedelbart, utan ett lngt administrativt 8 9 10 11 18 Ruta 1 Đ Avbrott och innehllande av betalningar frn EU:s budget Kommissionen mste i princip genomfra utbetalningen till medlemsstaten inom tv mnader efter det att betalningsanskan mottagits.
The Commission may however interrupt8 the payment deadline for a maximum of six months if there is evidence to suggest a significant deficiency in the functioning of the management and control system of the Member State9; or if the Commission has to carry out additional verifications following the receipt of information that uncorrected irregular expenditure has been certified in a statement of expenditure. 
Kommissionen fr dock avbryta8 betalningsfristen i hgst sex mnader om det finns bevis som tyder p en allvarlig brist i medlemsstatens frvaltnings-och kontrollsystems stt att fungera 9 eller om kommissionen mste genomfra ytterligare kontroller efter det att den har ftt uppgifter om att okorrigerade oriktiga utgifter har attesterats i en utgiftsdeklaration.
The Commission may suspend10 an interim payment or a part of it, if there is evidence of a serious deficiency in the management and control system, which was not corrected by the Member State; or in case irregular uncorrected expenditure linked to a serious irregularity has been declared in a certified statement of expenditure; or in case there has been a serious breach by a Member State of its management and control obligations. 
Kommissionen kan stlla in10 samtliga eller en del av de mellanliggande betalningarna om det finns bevis som tyder p allvarliga brister i frvaltnings-och kontrollsystemet som inte har korrigerats av medlemsstaten, om okorrigerade oriktiga utgifter som r knutna till en allvarlig oriktighet har redovisats i en attesterad utgiftsdeklaration eller om en medlemsstat har sidosatt sina frvaltnings-och kontrollskyldigheter p ett allvarligt stt.
The suspension is preceded by a pre‐suspension11, through which the Commission informs the Member State of deficiencies found. 
Instllandet fregs av en frhandsunderrttelse om instllande11, dr kommissionen meddelar medlemsstaten om de brister som konstaterats.
The aim of the pre‐suspension is to give the Member State the possibility to address the deficiencies and the right to be heard before a suspension is decided upon. 
Syftet med frhandsunderrttelsen r att ge medlemsstaten mjlighet att tgrda bristerna och rtten att bli hrd innan beslutet om instllande fattas.
Article 91 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Artikel 91 i frordning (EG) nr 1083/2006.
This is particularly relevant when the Member State’s audit authority sends its annual control report containing its audit findings to the Commission at year end. 
Detta gller i synnerhet nr medlemsstatens revisionsmyndighet vid rsslutet skickar in sin rliga kontrollrapport med revisionsresultatet till kommissionen.
Article 92 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Artikel 92 i frordning (EG) nr 1083/2006.
deficiencies12. To apply a suspension, however, a serious deficiency needs to be established resulting in prior longer procedure (see Box 1). 
Fr att stlla in utbetalningar mste dock en allvarlig (serious) brist faststllas, vilket innebr ett lngre frfarande innan instllandet kan trda i kraft (se ruta 1).* 16.
If there is no payment claim pending (i.e. there is no payment deadline to be interrupted), the Commission may also issue a warning. 
Om det inte finns ngon pgende betalningsanskan (dvs. ingen betalningsfrist att avbryta) kan kommissionen ocks utfrda en varning.
The Commission warns the Member State that if a payment application has been submitted, its payment deadline will be interrupted. 
Kommissionen varnar medlemsstaten fr att betalningsfristen kommer att avbrytas om en betalningsanskan lmnas in.
This procedure is, however, not set out in the regulations. 
Ngot sdant frfarande faststlls dock inte i frordningarna.
Suspensions are applied by a legally binding Commission decision addressed to the Member State concerned. 
Instllande av utbetalningar verkstlls genom ett rttsligt bindande kommissionsbeslut riktat till den berrda medlemsstaten.
All other preventive measures (warning, interruption, pre‐ suspension) take the form of a letter signed by a director‐general of the Commission (acting in its capacity as Authorising Officer by Delegation) and addressed to Member State authorities. 
Alla andra frebyggande tgrder (varningar, avbrott och frhandsunderrttelser om instllande) vidtas i form av ett brev som ngon av kommissionens generaldirektrer undertecknar (i sin egenskap av delegerad utanordnare) och riktas till medlemsstaternas myndigheter.
Financial corrections by the Commission 18. 
Finansiella korrigeringar som grs av kommissionen 18.
Where serious deficiencies in the Member State management and control systems have led to systemic errors or the Commission has identified an individual irregularity, the Commission can also apply financial corrections (see Annex I)13. 
Om allvarliga brister i medlemsstatens frvaltnings-och kontrollsystem har lett till systembetingade fel eller om kommissionen har funnit en enskild oriktighet kan kommissionen ocks gra finansiella korrigeringar (se bilaga I)13.
The purpose of financial corrections is to restore a situation where all of the expenditure declared for co‐financing from the ERDF, CF or ESF and reimbursed by the Commission is in line with the applicable rules14. 
Syftet med finansiella korrigeringar r att terupprtta en situation dr alla utgifter som redovisats fr medfinansiering frn Eruf, Sammanhllningsfonden eller ESF och betalats av kommissionen fljer de tillmpliga reglerna14.
During the 2000‐2006 and 2007‐2013 programme periods, Member States were able to replace irregular expenditure with new expenditure if they took the necessary corrective actions and applied the related financial correction (confirmed financial correction)15. 
Under programperioderna 2000Đ2006 och 2007Đ2013 kunde medlemsstaterna erstta oriktiga utgifter med nya utgifter om de vidtog de ndvndiga korrigeringstgrderna och genomfrde den tillhrande finansiella korrigeringen (bekrftad finansiell korrigering)15.
Whether this happened in practice depended, however, on the Member State’s ability to declare additional (regular) expenditure. 
Om det intrffade i praktiken berodde dock p medlemsstatens frmga att redovisa ytterligare (riktiga) utgifter.
If the Member State did not have such additional expenditure to declare, the financial correction resulted in a net correction (loss of funding). 
Om medlemsstaten inte hade ngra sdana ytterligare utgifter att redovisa ledde den finansiella korrigeringen till en nettokorrigering (frlust av medel).
In contrast, a Commission financial correction decision had always a direct and net impact on the Member State: it had to pay the amount back and its envelope was reduced (i.e. the Member State could spend less money throughout the programme period). 
Dremot hade en finansiell korrigering som utfrdes av kommissionen alltid en direkt nettoinverkan p medlemsstaten som var tvungen att betala tillbaka beloppet och fick minskade anslag (medlemsstaten kunde allts spendera mindre pengar under hela programperioden).
The Commission does not address financial corrections to beneficiaries directly, but to Member State authorities managing the OPs. 
Kommissionen riktar inte de finansiella korrigeringarna direkt till stdmottagarna utan till de av medlemsstatens myndigheter som frvaltar de operativa programmen.
Should a financial correction relate to individual projects implemented by beneficiaries, it is the Member State authorities who must process the financial correction towards the beneficiary. 
Om en finansiell korrigering avser enskilda projekt som genomfrs av stdmottagare r det medlemsstaternas myndigheter som ska genomfra den finansiella korrigeringen gentemot stdmottagaren.
Annex III provides an overview of the different scenarios concerning the impact of the financial corrections on Member States up to the end of the 2007‐2013 programme period. 
I bilaga III finns en versikt ver de olika scenarierna rrande de finansiella korrigeringarnas inverkan p medlemsstaterna fram till slutet av programperioden 2007Đ 2013.
Determining the amount of financial corrections 22. 
Att faststlla beloppet fr finansiella korrigeringar 22.
The Commission can determine the amount of a financial correction in different ways (see Box 2). 
Kommissionen faststller beloppet fr en finansiell korrigering p olika stt (se ruta 2).
Box 2 ‐ Individual, flat rate and extrapolated financial corrections The Commission has established three different ways to determine the amount of a financial correction17: (a) The amount of a financial correction is assessed based on individual cases and equals the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the EU budget (individual correction). (b) When it is not possible or not cost‐effective to calculate the amount of expenditure wrongly charged to the EU budget precisely, a flat rate correction may be applied based on pre‐set criteria and scales. Flat rate financial corrections impact a whole operational programme or a part of it 16 17 19 Article 139.10 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
20 Ruta 2 Đ Enskilda finansiella korrigeringar, schablonkorrigeringar och extrapolerade finansiella korrigeringar Kommissionen har infrt tre olika stt fr att faststlla beloppet fr en finansiell korrigering17: 15 16 17 Artiklarna 38 och 39 i frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999 och artiklarna 98.2 och 100.4 i frordning (EG) nr 1083/2006. Artikel 139.10 i frordning (EG) nr 1303/2013.
Paragraphs 1.4 to 1.6 of C(2011) 7321. 
Punkterna 1.4Đ1.6 i K(2011) 7321.
20 (e.g. one or several priorities, projects related to specific calls for proposal, measures managed by a specific intermediate body) and usually address horizontal (affecting more projects or priorities), systematic (occurring several times) or systemic (related to systems) problems or specific ineligible expenditure (i.e. weaknesses in checks by the managing authority or intermediate body, problems with public procurement). (c) When irregularities occur in a large number of cases and it is not cost‐effective to examine all cases affected by the irregularity, extrapolation may be used to determine the amount of financial correction. 
Finansiella schablonkorrigeringar pverkar ett helt operativt program eller en del av det (t.ex. en eller flera prioriteringar, projekt som avser srskilda uppmaningar att lmna in frslag eller tgrder som frvaltas av ett frmedlande organ) och avser vanligtvis problem som r horisontella (som pverkar fler projekt eller prioriteringar), systematiska (som frekommer flera gnger) eller systemrelaterade (som avser system) eller srskilda oberttigade utgifter (dvs. brister i den frvaltande myndighetens eller det frmedlande organets kontroller eller problem vid offentlig upphandling). c) Nr oriktigheter frekommer i ett stort antal renden och det inte r kostnadseffektivt att underska alla renden som berrs av oriktigheten kan extrapolering anvndas fr att faststlla beloppet fr den finansiella korrigeringen.
This means that the amount to be corrected for all affected cases is estimated based on a small number of cases examined. 
Det innebr att det belopp som ska korrigeras fr alla de berrda rendena uppskattas p grundval av ett litet antal underskta renden.
If the irregular expenditure leading to the financial correction has already been claimed for reimbursement from the EU budget, the financial correction corrects the past (ex‐post financial correction). 
Om det redan har begrts ersttning frn EU:s budget fr den oriktiga utgiften som leder till den finansiella korrigeringen, rttar den finansiella korrigeringen det som redan har intrffat (finansiell efterhandskorrigering).
However, if the irregular expenditure had not yet been claimed for reimbursement from the EU budget, the financial correction addresses the future (ex‐ante financial correction). 
Men om det nnu inte har begrts ersttning fr den oriktiga utgiften frn EU:s budget avser den finansiella korrigeringen det som ska intrffa (finansiell frhandskorrigering).
This latter means that already when declaring expenditure to the Commission, Member States deduct from eligible expenditure the financial correction. 
Det senare innebr att medlemsstaten drar av den finansiella korrigeringen frn de stdberttigande utgifterna redan nr utgifterna redovisas till kommissionen.
Ex‐ ante and ex‐post financial corrections can occur simultaneously within the same case ensuring the correction of the past and the future. 
Finansiella efterhands-och frhandskorrigeringar kan frekomma samtidigt inom samma rende, vilket skerstller korrigeringar bde av dtid och av framtid.
Annex I describes the process leading to a preventive measure and/or financial correction and its resolution. 
I bilaga I beskrivs den process som leder till en frebyggande tgrd och/eller finansiell korrigering och genomfrandet av den.
No preventive measures or financial corrections for underachievement of results 25. 
Inga frebyggande tgrder eller finansiella korrigeringar om resultaten inte uppns 25.
During the 2000‐2006 and 2007‐2013 programme periods, there was no legal provision which would have permitted the Commission to initiate suspension procedures and impose financial corrections in the case of underachievement of results at the level of a programme or a priority axis. 
Under programperioderna 2000Đ2006 och 2007Đ2013 fanns det ingen rttslig bestmmelse som tillt kommissionen att inleda frfaranden om instllande av utbetalningar och gra finansiella korrigeringar om resultaten p program-eller 22 insatsomrdesniv inte uppnddes.
We have criticised this deficiency in the regulations in several reports18. 
Vi har i flera rapporter kritiserat denna brist i frordningarna18.
Recovery of unduly paid amounts by Member States 26. 
Medlemsstaternas terkrav av felaktigt utbetalda belopp 26.
Under shared management, Member States are responsible for detecting, correcting and preventing errors so that only regular expenditure is reimbursed from the EU budget. 
Vid delad frvaltning r medlemsstaterna ansvariga fr att upptcka, korrigera och frhindra fel s att endast korrekta utgifter betalas frn EU:s budget.
Member States are also required to recover unduly paid (from the EU budget) amounts from beneficiaries19. 
Medlemsstaterna ska ocks terkrva belopp som felaktigt betalats ut (frn EU:s budget) till stdmottagare19.
However, this is not possible if: (a) the error was not committed by the beneficiary, but it concerns issues linked to the functioning of the management and control system (e.g. issues related to the selection of operations to be co‐financed); or (b) the amount is irrecoverable from the beneficiary (e.g. the beneficiary went bankrupt). 
Detta r dock inte mjligt a) om felet inte begicks av stdmottagaren utan rr problem som har med frvaltnings-och kontrollsystemets funktion att gra (till exempel problem som rr valet av insatser som ska medfinansieras), eller b) om beloppet inte kan terkrvas frn stdmottagaren (t.ex. om stdmottagaren gtt i konkurs).
In these cases the Member State budget bears the financial burden of the financial corrections unless it can be shared with the EU budget. 
I sdana fall belastar den finansiella korrigeringen medlemsstatens budget svida den inte kan delas med EU:s budget.
According to the information provided by Member States to the Commission as of the end of 2015, the publicly (EU and national) financed amount irrecoverable from beneficiaries is 57 million euro (corresponding to total (private and public) eligible expenditure amounting to 115 million euro) for all OPs for the entire 2007‐2013 period20. 28. 
Enligt den information som medlemsstaterna lmnade till kommissionen i slutet av 2015 uppgick det belopp som finansierades offentligt (av EU eller p nationell niv) och som inte kunde terkrvas frn stdmottagarna till 57 miljoner euro (vilket motsvarar stdberttigande utgifter (privata och offentliga) om totalt 115 miljoner euro) fr alla operativa program under hela perioden 2007Đ201320.
Moreover, when an unduly paid amount is recovered from a public body acting as beneficiary, the financial correction is de facto still borne by a national, regional or local public budget. rural development programmes”, paragraph 48 (http://eca.europa.eu), Annual Report concerning financial year 2013, paragraph 10.9 (OJ C 398, 12.11.2014). 
18 19 20 Punkt 80 i srskild rapport nr 23/2016 Sjtransporten inom EU: p stormigt hav Đ till stora delar ondamlsenliga och ohllbara investeringar (http://eca.europa.eu), punkt 48 i srskild rapport nr 36/2016 En bedmning av arrangemangen fr avslutande av sammanhllnings-och landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen 2007Đ2013 (http://eca.europa.eu) och punkt 10.9 i rsrapporten fr budgetret 2013 (EUT C 398, 12.11.2014).
19 20 21 Article 70 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006. 
Artikel 70 i frordning (EG) nr 1083/2006.
Information from the Commission database as of 31 May 2016, based on data reported in Article 20 reports. 
Uppgift frn kommissionens databas per den 31 maj 2016, p grundval av uppgifter som rapporterats i artikel 20-rapporterna.
Financial corrections are a key input to establishing the residual risk for payments from the EU budget in Cohesion 29. 
Finansiella korrigeringar r viktiga fr att faststlla den kvarstende risken fr utbetalningar frn EU:s budget p sammanhllningsomrdet 29.
Since 2000, specific regulatory requirements have been added to reinforce the responsibility of Member States to detect, correct and prevent errors and the OPs’ management and control systems have been changed accordingly. Annual error rates per programme for a representative sample of operations validated by the Commission 30. 
Sedan r 2000 har srskilda regleringsmssiga krav lagts till fr att frstrka medlemsstaternas skyldighet att upptcka, korrigera och frhindra fel, och de operativa programmens frvaltnings-och kontrollsystem har ndrats i enlighet med detta. rliga felprocentsatser per program fr ett representativt urval insatser som validerats av kommissionen 30.
For the 2000‐2006 period, dedicated national authorities needed to check 5 % of eligible expenditure before the winding up of OPs, taking into account their own assessment of the risks that irregularities could occur and aiming at a representative coverage of the OPs’ spending21. 
Fr perioden 2000Đ2006 skulle srskilda nationella myndigheter kontrollera 5 % av de stdberttigande utgifterna innan de operativa programmen avslutades och d sjlva bedma risken fr att oriktigheter kunde frekomma och ha som ml att p ett representativt stt tcka in det operativa programmets utgifter21.
The Member States also needed to report on amounts awaiting recovery on a yearly basis22. 
Medlemsstaterna skulle ven varje r rapportera belopp som nnu inte hade terkrvts22.
There was however no requirement to calculate annually an overall error rate or to issue any annual audit opinion. 
Det fanns dock inget krav p att rligen berkna en total felprocent eller att gra ett rligt revisionsuttalande.
For the 2007‐2013 period, the regulation introduced Member State audit authorities who should issue an annual control report (ACR) together with an audit opinion on the legality and regularity of underlying transactions23. 
Nr det gller perioden 2007Đ2013 innebar frordningen att revisionsmyndigheter i medlemsstaterna skulle utfrda en rlig kontrollrapport med ett revisionsuttalande om de underliggande transaktionernas laglighet och korrekthet23.
The ACR contained an error rate based on a representative sample of audits of operations, which was checked, i.e. validated by the Commission. 
I den rliga kontrollrapporten angavs en felprocent som baserades p ett representativt urval med revisioner av insatser som kontrollerades, det vill sga validerades, av kommissionen.