natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Differentiation was identified in particular with regards to services provided online, with automatic address-based redirection or the existence of parallel country-based websites. 
Framfr allt konstaterades differentiering nr det gllde onlinetjnster, med en automatisk adressbaserad omdirigering eller frekomst av parallella landbaserade webbplatser.
70 The study suggests that there could be both legal and regulatory as well as business drivers to such differences arising. 
70 Studien tyder p att det skulle kunna finnas svl rttsliga och regleringsmssiga som affrsmssiga skl till att sdana skillnader uppstr.
Examples of legal and regulatory drivers of differentiation could be financial costs, compliance costs or differences in the MSs’ legislation, while business drivers could be transport and delivery costs, marketing costs or corporate structure, including franchising. 
Exempel p rttsliga och regleringsmssiga skl till differentiering skulle kunna vara finansiella kostnader, regelefterlevnadskostnader och skillnader i medlemsstaternas lagstiftning, medan affrsmssiga skl skulle kunna vara transport-och leveranskostnader, marknadsfringskostnader och fretagsstruktur, inbegripet franchising.
71 The second report aimed to identify obstacles to cross-border online shopping. 
71 Den andra rapporten syftade till att identifiera hinder fr grnsverskridande nthandel.
With the help of 17 EU members of the ECC network, a shopping exercise of 305 online cross-border purchases was made for ten relevant product categories40. 
Med hjlp av 17 EU-medlemmar i ntverket av europeiska konsumentcentrum gjordes 305 grnsverskridande kp p ntet i tio produktkategorier40.
Overall, ECCs reported that 173 cases out of the 305 (56 %) had some issues aris-ing41 regarding the contractual terms and customer rights, showing that consumers still face obstacles in cross-border receipt of services. 
Totalt sett rapporterade de europeiska konsumentcentrumen att det i 173 av de 305 (56 %) fallen uppstod ngot problem41 med avtalsvillkoren och konsument-rttigheterna, vilket visar att konsumenterna fortfarande mter hinder i mottagandet av grnsverskridande tjnster.
38 Published on 7 December 2009. 
38 Offentliggjord den 7 december 2009.
39 Published in September 2011. 
39 Offentliggjord i september 2011.
40 Items included clothing, sporting goods, household goods, books, music DVDs, video or computer games, software, electronic equipment and personal care products. 
40 Artiklarna inkluderade klder, sportartiklar, hushllsvaror, bcker, musik-dvd:er, video-eller dataspel, programvara, elektronisk utrustning och kropps-vrdsprodukter.
41 For example, difficulties in finding enough web traders who were willing to sell across borders, rates of correct delivery, free delivery offers being withdrawn and differences in the amount to be charged to credit cards, which were then attributed to ‘VAT rates, customs clearance and currency issues’. 
41 Till exempel svrigheter att hitta tillrckligt mnga nt-handlare som var beredda att slja ver grnserna, andel korrekta leveranser, erbjudanden om fri leverans som drogs tillbaka och skillnader nr det gllde belopp som skulle debiteras kreditkort som sedan tillskrevs problem med momssatser, tullklarering och valutor.
Many traders did not provide sufficient information about the customer rights to return goods. 
Mnga handlare informerade inte tillrckligt om kundens rtt att returnera varor.
Observations 28 Service providers still unfairly discriminate 72 Whilst Article 20(2) of the Directive requires that any discrimination be ‘directly justified by objective criteria’, recital 95 opens a loophole by referring to ‘objective reasons that can vary from country to country, such as additional costs incurred because of the distance involved or the technical characteristics of the provision of the service, or different market conditions, such as higher or lower demand influenced by seasonality, different vacation periods in the MSs and pricing by different competitors, or extra risks linked to rules differing from those of the MS of establishment’. 
Iakttagelser 28 Tjnsteleverantrer diskriminerar fortfarande p ett orttvist stt 72 Artikel 20.2 i direktivet anger att diskriminerande skillnader i villkoren ska vara Ódirekt motiverade av objektiva faktorerÓ, medan skl 95 i ingressen utgr ett kryphl genom hnvisningen till Óobjektiva faktorer som kan variera lnderna emellan, som hgre faktiska kostnader p grund av avstnd, tekniska detaljer i samband med tillhandahllandet, olika marknadsvillkor, exempelvis ssongsp-verkad hgre eller lgre efterfrgan, olika semesterperioder i medlemsstaterna och olika konkurrenters prissttning eller strre risktagande p grund av att bestmmelserna skiljer sig frn dem i etableringsmedlemsstatenÓ.
73 This has led to unjustifiable discrimination as illustrated in the examples shown in Box 2. 
73 Detta har lett till orttvis diskriminering, ssom illustreras av exemplen i ruta 2.
Discriminatory practices towards consumers ‘While booking a vacation package online with a theme park based in France, a Bulgarian consumer selected by mistake the UK as her country of residence. 
Diskriminerande behandling av konsumenter Nr en bulgarisk konsument skulle boka ett semesterpaket p ntet fr en vistelse i en temapark i Frankrike valde hon av misstag Storbritannien som bosttningsland.
She soon spotted her mistake and selected Bulgaria instead. 
Hon upptckte snabbt sitt misstag och valde Bulgarien i stllet.
The consumer learned that there was nearly 40 % price difference and she was asked to pay EUR 500 more than her British counterparts.’ 
D konstaterade hon en prisskillnad p nstan 40 % och ombads betala 500 euro mer n om hon hade varit bosatt i Storbritannien.
‘While on holidays in an Austrian ski resort a German consumer discovered that the purchase price of tickets for lifts was much more expensive for tourists than for Austrian residents.’ 
Under en semester i en sterrikisk skidort upptckte en tysk konsument att priset p liftkort var mycket hgre fr turister n fr personer bosatta i sterrike.
Source: Enhanced consumer protection — the Services Directive 2006/123/EC: analysis of Article 20.2 and Article 21 related consumer complaints reported to ECC‐net between 2010 and 2012, pp. 20-21. 
Klla: Frstrkt konsumentskydd Đ tjnstedirektivet 2006/123/EG. Analys av konsumentklagoml med anknytning till artikel 20.2 och artikel 21 som rapporterades till ECC-Net mellan 2010 och 2012, s.
74 ECC-net report lists a number of similar examples of such discriminatory treatment, which are more often based on residence than nationality and often indirectly applied based on country of credit card issuance or place of delivery. 
74 I rapporten frn ntverket av europeiska konsumentcentrum ges ett antal liknande exempel p diskriminerande behandling, som oftare grundas p bosttningsort n p nationalitet och som ofta sker indirekt p grundval av i vilket land kreditkortet har utfrdats eller utifrn leveransort.
Observations 29 75 Article 20(2) has also proved to be a cause of unease and uncertainty for businesses who do not understand what obligations may fall on them when selling long-distance to customers in other countries. 
Iakttagelser 29 75 Artikel 20.2 har ocks visat sig vara en orsak till oro och oskerhet fr fretag som inte frstr vilka skyldigheter som eventuellt ligger dem nr de bedriver lng-distansfrsljning till kunder i andra lnder.
According to retail representatives in the MSs, the guidance provided so far42 has failed to give reassurances or certainty about when businesses must supply across borders. 
Enligt representanter fr detaljhandeln i medlemsstaterna har den vgledning som getts hittills42 inte lyckats skapa klarhet eller visshet om nr fretag mste leverera ver grnserna.
Resolving the problems 76 The Commission has adopted a thematic approach to resolving the most significant types of problems relating to service providers. 
Lsa problemen 76 Kommissionen har tillmpat en tematisk metod fr att frska lsa de viktigaste typerna av problem nr det gller tjnsteleverantrer.
It uses the CPC network to conduct ‘sweeps’, which consist of EU-wide screening of websites in particular online sectors. 
Den anvnder ntverket fr konsumentskyddssamarbete fr att genomfra gemensamma marknadskontroller som bestr av EU-omfattande kontroll av webbplatser i vissa onlinesek-torer.
Simultaneous, coordinated checks are made to identify breaches of consumer law and to subsequently ensure its enforcement. 
Samtidigt grs samordnade kontroller fr att identifiera vertrdelser av konsumentlagstiftningen och drefter se till att den fljs.
Following such investigations, the relevant national authorities should take proper enforcement action, contacting companies about suspected irregularities and ask them to take corrective action or face legal proceedings. 
Efter sdana underskningar ska de behriga nationella myndigheterna vidta lmpliga efterlevnadstgrder, kontakta fretag om misstnkta oriktigheter och uppmana dem att vidta korrigerande tgrder eller, i annat fall, vara instllda p rttsliga tgrder.
Sweeps have been made in the following fields: airlines, mobile phone content, electronic goods, online ticket sales, consumer credit, digital contents and online travel booking. 
Gemensamma marknadskontroller har gjorts p fljande omrden: flygbolag, mobiltelefoninnehll, elektronikprodukter, biljettfrsljning p ntet, konsu-mentkredit, digitalt innehll och resebokning p ntet.
77 According to an external evaluation43 carried out in 2012, the resulting enforcement rate was high for all sectors, although the impact of sweeps could be increased through more publicity and follow-up actions to ensure continued compliance. 
77 Enligt en extern utvrdering43 som gjordes 2012 blev resultatet en hg efterlev-nadsniv inom alla sektorer, ven om effekterna av gemensamma marknadskontroller skulle kunna bli strre genom mer publicitet och uppfljningstgrder fr att skerstlla fortsatt efterlevnad.
Unfortunately, the Directive’s requirements have not specifically been integrated into the evaluations carried out in these exercises since, according to the Commission, the CPC legislation was enacted prior to the Directive entering into force. 
Tyvrr har inte direktivets krav specifikt integrerats i de utvrderingar som gjorts eftersom, enligt kommissionen, lagstiftningen om konsumentskyddssamarbete antogs innan direktivet trdde i kraft.
The external evaluation made recommendations for extending the scope for the sweeps, but rejected the inclusion of the Directive in this, despite recognising that ‘[the Directive] guarantees certain rights to recipients of services such as non-discrimination, information rights, and professional liability insurance and commercial communication. 
Den externa utvrderingen innehll rekommendationer om att de gemensamma marknadskontrollernas omfattning borde utkas men frkastade en inkludering av direktivet i detta, trots att man medgav att direktivet garanterar tjnstemottagarna vissa rttigheter, till exempel icke-diskriminering, rtt till information och yrkesansvarsfrskring och marknadskommunikation.
The evaluation considered, however, that ‘the Services Directive has a strong focus on MSs’ obligations rather than on the activities of individual service providers, and secondly, the Directive also covers business-to-business aspects (i.e. the concept of “recipients of services” is not limited to consumers) inconsistent with the consumer focus of the CPC objectives.’ 
I utvrderingen sade man dock dels att tjnstedirektivet har en stark inriktning p medlemsstaternas skyldigheter och inte p enskilda tjnsteleverantrers verksamhet, dels att direktivet ocks omfattar aspekter mellan fretag (dvs. begreppet ÓtjnstemottagareÓ r inte begrnsat till konsumenter), vilket inte skulle verensstmma med konsumentinriktningen i mlen fr konsumentskyddssamarbetet.
This view is in contradiction with the evidence presented in the ECC-net report which underlines the important effect on consumers of non-compliance with the Directive. 
Denna stndpunkt strider mot de bevis som presenterades i rapporten frn ntverket av europeiska konsumentcentrum som understryker de betydande effekter som bristande efterlevnad av direktivet fr fr konsumenterna.
42 SWD(2012) 146 final of 8 June 2012, ‘Commission staff working document — With a view to establishing guidance on the application of Article 20(2) of Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market (‘the Services Directive’). 
42 SWD(2012) 146 final, 8.6.2012, Commission Staff Working Document - With a view to establishing guidance on the application of Article 20(2) of Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market (Őthe Services DirectiveŐ) (arbetsdokument frn kommissionens avdelningar fr att faststlla riktlinjer fr tillmpningen av artikel 20.2 i direktiv 2006/123/EG om tjnster p den inre marknaden (tjnstedirektivet).
43 (External) evaluation of the consumer protection cooperation regulation — Final report submitted by the Consumer Policy Evaluation Consortium (CPEC), 17 December 2012. 
43 (Extern) utvrdering av frordningen om konsumentskyddssamarbete, slutrapport frn Consumer Policy Evaluation Consortium (CPEC), 17 december 2012.
Observations 30 Enforcement The Commission employs a number of enforcement tools 78 Compliance with the Directive is important from both the legal and the economic point of view. 
Iakttagelser 30 Efterlevnadstgrder Kommissionen anvnder ett antal efterlevnadsverktyg 78 Efterlevnad av direktivet r viktigt ur bde rttslig och ekonomisk synvinkel.
When EU rights are breached, quick and efficient solutions are needed for both the service providers and the service recipients. 
Nr rttigheter enligt EU:s lagstiftning krnks behvs snabba och effektiva lsningar fr bde tjnsteleverantrerna och tjnstemottagarna.
79 The Commission may initiate an infringement procedure against an MS that has failed to fulfil a treaty obligation. 
79 Kommissionen kan inleda ett vertrdelsefrfarande mot en medlemsstat som har underltit att uppfylla en skyldighet enligt frdraget.
The Commission has also set up the general pre-infringement mechanism EU pilot and the alternative conflict resolution mechanism Solvit, which is specifically designed for internal market issues. 
Kommissionen har ocks infrt en allmn mekanism som fregr ett vertrdelsefrfarande, EU Pilot, och den alternativa konfliktlsningsmekanismen Solvit som har utformats specifikt fr inremarknadsfrgor.
In addition, the Commission can address high-level issues at the political level by making country-specific recommendations (CSRs) under the European semester. 
Dessutom kan kommissionen ta upp hgnivfrgor p politisk niv genom att utfrda landsspecifika rekommendationer inom den europeiska planeringsterminen.
Solvit is rarely used for the Services Directive 80 Solvit is a free, mainly online service between MSs, provided by the national administrations. 
Solvit anvnds sllan i samband med tjnstedirektivet 80 Solvit r en kostnadsfri, till strsta delen ntbaserad tjnst mellan medlemsstaterna som tillhandahlls av de nationella frvaltningarna.
It was set up in 200144 and updated in 201345. 
Den inrttades 200144 och uppdaterades 201345.
Solvit provides solutions to a range of practical situations such as: getting professional qualifications recognised, visa and residence rights, trade and services (businesses), vehicles and driving licences, family benefits, pension rights, working abroad, unemployment benefits, health insurance, access to education, cross-border movement of capital or payments and VAT refunds. In 2013 the Commission issued a brochure with examples of practical solutions to individual problems achieved by using Solvit centres. 
Solvit erbjuder lsningar i en rad olika konkreta situationer, till exempel fljande: erknnande av yrkeskvalifikationer, visum och uppehlls-rtt, handel och tjnster (fretag), fordon och krkort, familjebidrag, pensionsrt-tigheter, arbete utomlands, arbetslshetsersttning, sjukfrskring, tilltrde till utbildning, grnsverskridande kapital-eller betalningsrrelser och momster-betalning. r 2013 gav kommissionen ut en broschyr med exempel p konkreta lsningar p enskilda problem som man hittat med Solvit-centrumens hjlp.
81 In general, the majority of cases are resolved successfully, within an average of 9 weeks46 (against a target of 10 weeks47). 
81 I regel kan merparten av rendena lsas p ett framgngsrikt stt, i genomsnitt inom nio veckor46 (vilket kan jmfras med ett ml p tio veckor47).
Typically, the system has received approximately 1 400 cases per year, increasing to 2 368 in 2014. 
Systemet har normalt sett tagit emot omkring 1 400 renden per r, men 2014 skedde en kning till 2 368 renden.
44 Commission recommendation of 7 December 2001 on principles for using ‘Solvit’— the internal market problem solving network (OJ L 331, 15.12.2001), p. 
44 Kommissionens rekommendation av den 7 december 2001 om principer fr anvndning av ÓSolvitÓ Đ problemlsningsntverket fr den inre marknaden (EGT L 331, 15.12.2001), s.
45 Commission recommendation of 17 September 2013 on the principles governing Solvit (C(2013) 5869 final). 
45 Kommissionens rekommendation av den 17 september 2013 om principerna fr Solvit, Bryssel (C(2013) 5869 final).
46 Commission recommendation on the principles governing Solvit (17 September 2013), p. 
46 Kommissionens rekommendation om principerna fr Solvit (17 september 2013), s.
47 http://ec.europa.eu/solvit/ index_en.htm 
47 http://ec.europa.eu/solvit/ index_en.htm
Observations 31 Solvit solutions Solvit lets tourists charter German yachts in Italy A German enterprise chartered four yachts under a German flag to tourists in Italy. 
Iakttagelser 31 Solvit-lsningar Solvit lter turister chartra tyska yachter i Italien Ett tyskt fretag chartrade fyra yachter under tysk flagg till turister i Italien.
The business owner was fined for not having registered its commercial yachts with local port authorities in accordance with recent Italian regulations. 
Fretagets gare btflldes fr att vederbrande inte hade registrerat sina kommersiella yachter hos de lokala hamnmyndigheterna i enlighet med nya italienska bestmmelser.
Five months later, after repeated efforts to obtain registration, the business owner was told that registration would only be possible if the business was established in Italy. 
Fem mnader senare, efter upprepade frsk att registrera yachterna, fick fretagets gare veta att registrering endast var mjlig om fretaget var etablerat i Italien.
Solvit stepped in to make it clear that this condition was not in line with EU law and that the authorities should accept the registration in the German Chamber of Commerce. 
Solvit ingrep d och frklarade att detta villkor inte var frenligt med EU:s lagstiftning och att myndigheterna skulle acceptera registreringen i den tyska handelskammaren.
All four yachts were registered and charter licences were issued. 
Alla fyra yachter registrerades och charterlicenser utfrdades.
Solved within 9 weeks Solvit ensures fair treatment for rafting companies in Slovenia Rafting companies from Hungary and Slovakia complained that cheaper, year-long access to a particular river in Slovenia was reserved for Slovenian companies. 
Lst inom nio veckor Solvit skerstller rttvis behandling av forsrnningsfretag i Slovenien Forsrnningsfretag frn Ungern och Slovakien klagade p att billigare, rslng tillgng till en viss flod i Slovenien hade reserverats fr slovenska fretag.
Foreign companies not only had to pay more but had the daily inconvenience of buying tickets. 
De utlndska fretagen mste inte bara betala mer utan var ocks tvungna att kpa biljetter varje dag.
Thanks to Solvit, the discriminatory rules were changed and foreign companies can now ply their trade on Slovenia’s rivers on the same basis as local companies. 
Tack vare Solvit ndrades de diskriminerande reglerna, och utlndska fretag kan nu bedriva verksamhet p Sloveniens floder p samma villkor som lokala fretag.
Solved within 10 months Source: European Commission, Solvit — Success stories, 2013. 
Lst inom tio mnader Klla: Europeiska kommissionen, SOLVIT Ń Success stories (Solvit Đ framgngshistorier), 2013.
82 However, Solvit plays a minor role regarding the Directive. In 2014 only 17 cases out of 2 368 related thereto (six in 2013, 16 in both 2012 and 2011). 
82 Solvit spelar dock en mindre roll nr det gller direktivet. r 2014 rrde endast 17 av de 2 368 rendena direktivet (sex renden 2013 och 16 renden svl 2012 som 2011).
83 Solvit has limited personnel and technical capacity to handle complex business cases48. 
83 Solvit har begrnsade personalresurser och tekniska resurser och kan inte behandla komplexa fretagsrenden48.
In large MSs such as Germany, France and the United Kingdom, Solvit centres are understaffed49 and the number of staff with legal qualifications is insufficient50. 
I stora lnder som Tyskland, Frankrike och Storbritannien r Solvit-centrumen underbemannade49, och antalet anstllda med juridisk kompetens r otillrckligt50.
The Commission, however, organises regular training courses for Solvit centre staff on legal issues. 
Kommissionen anordnar dock regelbundna utbildningskurser i juridiska frgor fr personalen vid Solvit-centrumen.
48 Nordic innovation report, Delivering a stronger single market, June 2012, p. 
48 Nordic Innovation Report Delivering a stronger Single Market (en starkare inre marknad), juni 2012, s.
50 M. Kaeding, F. Voskamp, Better implementation of EU legislation is not just a question of taking Member States to Court, working paper (2011/w/01 EIPA), p. 10. 
M. Kaeding, F. Voskamp, Better Implementation of EU Legislation is not just a question of taking Member States to Court (bttre genomfrande av EU:s lagstiftning r inte bara en frga om att dra medlemsstater infr rtta), arbetsdokument (2011/w/01 EIPA), s.10.
Observations 32 84 Most cases have been introduced by private individuals, and only approximately 20 cases have been introduced by companies, as they generally have other means to resolve problems arising when conducting business abroad. 
Iakttagelser 32 84 De flesta renden har lmnats in av enskilda personer, medan endast cirka 20 renden har lmnats in av fretag eftersom de i regel har andra medel att tillg fr att lsa problem som uppstr nr de bedriver affrsverksamhet utomlands.
A study made by the Commission in 2011 stated that businesses would prefer to go to formal instances to find solutions. 
I en studie av kommissionen frn 2011 angavs att fretag hellre skulle vnda sig till formella instanser fr att finna lsningar.
85 The solutions provided by Solvit are not legislative solutions, and information on cases and how they have been resolved is not available to the public, therefore not helping other possibly interested parties. 
85 De lsningar som Solvit tillhandahller r inte lagstiftningslsningar, och information om renden och hur de har lsts finns inte tillgnglig fr allmnheten och hjlper drfr inte andra eventuellt berrda parter.
Moreover, different solutions may be provided to identical problems, for example by different MSs and regional authorities. 
Dessutom kan olika lsningar tillhandahllas p identiska problem av till exempel olika medlemsstater och regionala myndigheter.
EU pilot — a pre‐infringement system appreciated by Member States 86 EU pilot is a confidential mechanism for the exchange of information between the Commission and the MSs. 
EU Pilot Đ ett system fre ett vertrdelsefrfarande som uppskattas av medlemsstaterna 86 EU Pilot r en konfidentiell mekanism fr utbyte av information mellan kommissionen och en medlemsstat.
It was set up by the Commission in 2008 with 15 volunteer MSs51 and by July 2013 included all 28 MSs. 
Den infrdes av kommissionen 2008 tillsammans med 15 frivilliga medlemsstater51 och omfattade i juli 2013 alla 28 medlemsstaterna.