natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The non‐adoption of the 2016 AAP caused considerable delays in implementing the planned actions, as the implementation of 163 million euro under the MIP for 2016 was postponed. 
Att tgrdsprogrammet fr 2016 inte antogs ledde till att de planerade tgrderna frsenades betydligt eftersom genomfrandet av 163 miljoner euro inom det flerriga vgledande 16
Of the total allocation of almost one billion euro for the 2012‐2020 period (see Table 1), the amounts committed up to April 2017 accounted for 380.7 million euro. 
Av de totala anslagen p nstan en miljard euro fr perioden 2012Đ2020 (se tabell 1) hade taganden p 380,7 miljoner euro gjorts fram till april 2017.
The operational criteria considered when the aid modalities were selected and the Implementation Plan was developed were the “future workload of the Delegation” and assuring “a mix of aid modalities”. 
De operativa kriterier som vervgdes nr stdformerna valdes och genomfrandeplanen utvecklades var Ódelegationens framtida arbetsbelastningÓ och en garanterad Ómix av stdformerÓ.
None of the AAPs reviewed included the criterion of cost‐ effectiveness of the activities funded. 
Inget av de granskade rliga tgrdsprogrammen innehll ett kostnadseffektivitetskriterium fr de finansierade tgrderna.
Nevertheless, given the options at hand, the Commission’s choice of aid modalities was reasonable. 
Men mot bakgrund av de tillgngliga alternativen var kommissionens val av stdformer rimligt.
More than half of the amounts committed were allocated under the indirect management mode, and channelled mostly through UN‐managed Trust Funds (see paragraph 13). 
Mer n hlften av de belopp fr vilka taganden gjorts frvaltades genom indirekt frvaltning och kanaliserades oftast genom FN:s frvaltningsfonder (se punkt 13).
This allowed the Commission to work in close cooperation with other donors and be involved in large‐scale development actions. 
Det gjorde att kommissionen kunde ha ett nra samarbete med andra givare och delta i storskaliga utvecklingsinsatser.
This aid modality alleviated the burden on Commission staff, as the UN was primarily responsible for managing the Funds. 
Den hr stdformen minskade arbetsbrdan fr kommissionens personal eftersom FN hade huvudansvaret fr frvaltningen av fonderna.
Implementation by the Trust Funds was affected by delays in committing and disbursing funds 34. 
Frvaltningsfondernas genomfrande drabbades av frseningar nr det gllde taganden och betalningar av medel 34.
The Commission committed and disbursed funds to the Trust Funds quickly, but implementation of the UN‐managed Trust Fund programmes was affected by delays and slow budget absorption for programme activities. 
Kommissionen gjorde taganden och betalade medel till frvaltningsfonderna utan drjsml, men genomfrandet av de FN-frvaltade fondprogrammen drabbades av frseningar och budgetmedlen fr programverksamheten utnyttjades lngsamt.
The amounts disbursed for programme activities from LIFT accounted for just 53 % of the contributions to the Fund (with duration 2012‐2018), and in the case of 3MDG just 68 % (with duration 2012‐2017). 
De utbetalda beloppen fr LIFT:s programverksamhet motsvarade bara 53 % av bidragen till fonden (under perioden 2012Đ2018) och nr det gller 3MDG endast 68 % (under perioden 2012Đ2017).
Even though the JPF was set up in December 2015, only 3 % of the funding contributed had been paid out in programme activities11. 
Trots att den gemensamma fredsfonden JPF inrttades i december 2015 hade bara 3 % av fondens medel betalats ut till programverksamhet11.
Due to the slow implementation of programme activities the cash balances of the UN‐ managed Trust Funds were sizeable. 
P grund av det lngsamma genomfrandet av programverksamheterna hade stora kontantsaldon byggts upp i FN:s frvaltningsfonder.
In the case of LIFT, 3MDG and the JPF, they amounted to 74 million USD, 54 million USD and 18 million USD12, respectively13. 
I frga om LIFT, 3MDG och JPF, uppgick de till 74 miljoner US-dollar, 54 miljoner US-dollar respektive 18 miljoner US-dollar1213.
11 12 13 16 As at 31 January 2017 for LIFT, 1 November 2016 for 3MDG and 28 February 2017 for the JPF. 
11 12 Se ovan. Uppgifter frn den 31 januari 2017 fr LIFT, 1 november 2016 fr 3MDG och 28 februari 2017 fr JPF.
Dates vary due to different reporting cycles. 
Datumen varierar p grund av olika rapporteringscykler.
The contractual provisions signed between the EU and UNOPS, the UN agency that manages three of the four Trust Funds in Myanmar/Burma, allow the latter to retain the interest earned on funds advanced by the Commission. 
Enligt de avtalsbestmmelser som undertecknats av EU och Unops, det FN-organ som frvaltar tre av de fyra frvaltningsfonderna i Myanmar/Burma, fr FN-organet behlla intjnad rnta p de medel som kommissionen betalat in i frskott.
The Commission does not require UNOPS to allocate the interest earned to programme activities. 
Kommissionen krver inte att Unops ska frdela den intjnade rntan till programverksamhet.
Cost‐control provisions in EU‐UN contracts had little impact 37. 
Bestmmelserna om kostnadskontroll i avtalen mellan EU och FN hade liten inverkan 37.
The contractual provisions governing EU funding paid into UN Multi Donor Trust Funds are set out in contribution agreements. These outline the financial commitments of both parties. 
De avtalsbestmmelser som styr hanteringen av EU-medel som betalas till FN:s frvaltningsfonder med flera givare anges i bidragsverenskommelser dr bda parters finansiella taganden specificeras.
A specific clause in these contribution agreements states that indirect costs should be limited to 7 % of direct eligible costs incurred by the Funds. 
Enligt en srskild klausul i bidragsverenskommelserna fr de indirekta kostnaderna inte verstiga 7 % av fondernas direkta stdberttigande kostnader.
As the UN manages the Funds, cost‐control is primarily its responsibility. 
Eftersom det r FN som frvaltar fonderna r kostnadskontrollen i frsta hand FN:s ansvar.
However, the Commission also has an obligation to ensure cost‐effectiveness as regards EU contributions. 
Kommissionen har dock ocks en skyldighet att se till att EU:s bidrag r kostnadseffektiva.
One of the ways it tries to ensure this is by means of verification checks it carries out on the Funds. 
Ett stt som den frsker gra detta p r att utfra verensstmmelsekontroller av fonderna.
During these checks the verifiers examine the eligibility of the costs submitted by the Trust Funds. 
Vid dessa kontroller undersks stdberttigandet i de kostnader som frvaltningsfonderna redovisar.
In accordance with the agreement reached between the parties, if expenditure is found to be ineligible for EU funding, it will not be disallowed but will be borne by other donors, when sufficient funds are available. 
I enlighet med den verenskommelse som ntts mellan parterna ska utgifter som visar sig inte vara berttigande till EU-std inte avsls utan bras av andra givare om tillrckliga medel finns. Detta kallas den Óhypotetiska strateginÓ.
We encountered instances where verifications on behalf of the Commission had detected ineligible costs and the notional approach was applied (see Box 1). 
Vi fann exempel dr kommissionens kontroller hade upptckt icke stdberttigande kostnader och den hypotetiska strategin hade tillmpats (se ruta 1).
The examples above illustrate the limited extent to which the Commission can exercise control over the cost‐effectiveness of the Funds. 
Exemplen ovan illustrerar i vilken begrnsad omfattning kommissionen kan utva kontroll ver fondernas kostnadseffektivitet.
In most cases costs which are found to be ineligible by the Commission will be met by other donors. 
I de flesta fall nr kommissionen upptcker kostnader som inte r stdberttigande s tcks de i stllet av andra givare.
Thus, the findings of the verification checks will have little or no impact on the cost‐effectiveness of the Funds. 
Drmed har resultaten av verensstmmelsekontrollerna liten eller ingen inverkan p fondernas kostnadseffektivitet.
This is also the situation for indirect costs, in the absence of agreement among the donors on the application of an appropriate percentage rate. 
Detta gller ven fr indirekta kostnader, eftersom det inte finns ngon verenskommelse mellan de olika givarna om en tillmplig procentsats.
In cases where a donor is also an implementing partner in a multi‐donor action, such as in the QBEP (see Annex II and Box 2), there is a significant risk that indirect costs exceeding the 7 % agreed with the EU will be allocated to the implementing partner itself or to other donors. 
I fall dr en givare ocks r en genomfrandepartner i en tgrd med flera givare, ssom i QBEP (se bilaga II och ruta 2), finns det en betydande risk att indirekta kostnader som verstiger de 7 % som verenskommits med EU kommer att lggas p genomfrandepartnern sjlv eller andra givare.
Box 2 ‐ Example of high indirect costs In the case of the QBEP, indirect costs were twice as high as provided in EU‐UN contracts: in addition to the 7 % indirect costs included in the QBEP general budget, a further 7 % was included in the sub‐ grant budget for projects implemented via International Non‐Governmental Organisations (NGOs). 
20 Ruta 2 Đ Exempel p hga indirekta kostnader I fallet QBEP var de indirekta kostnaderna dubbelt s hga som de kostnader som angavs i avtalen mellan EU och FN: utver de indirekta kostnaderna p 7 % som ingick i QBEP:s allmnna budget ingick ytterligare 7 % i delbudgeten fr projekt som genomfrdes via internationella icke-statliga organisationer.
The costs paid under these sub‐grants are allocated to non‐EU funding sources. 
De kostnader som betalas av dessa delbidrag lggs p andra finansieringskllor n EU.
Nevertheless, the overall cost‐effectiveness of an action is diminished by the double charging of indirect costs, irrespective of the funding source to which the costs are assigned. 
En tgrds vergripande kostnadseffektivitet minskar dock genom att indirekta kostnader lggs p tv gnger, oberoende av vilken finansieringsklla som kostnaderna lggs p.
Crisis contract procedures were applied too broadly 41. 
Alltfr utbredd tillmpning av krisfrfaranden vid tilldelning av kontrakt 41.
The Commission decided on all directly managed projects, including their scope and budget, and was able to monitor progress closely throughout the lifespan of a project. 
Kommissionen beslutade om alla direkt frvaltade projekt, inbegripet deras omfattning och budget, och kunde noga vervaka framstegen under projektens hela livstid.
Tools such as the ROM exercise were used to assist the Commission in its management. 
Kommissionen anvnde sig av verktyg som resultatorienterad vervakning som std fr frvaltningen.
The Commission was also in a position to take action during the course of a project. 
Kommissionen hade ocks mjlighet att vidta tgrder under ett projekts gng.
The Commission therefore aimed to fund large projects. 
Kommissionen avsg drfr att finansiera stora projekt.
Over the 2012‐2016 period the Commission used the crisis‐declaration14 provisions to contract directly with implementing partners without any need for calls for proposals. 
Under perioden 2012Đ2016 tillmpade kommissionen de bestmmelser som gller i en frklarad krissituation14 fr att ing direkta kontrakt med genomfrandepartner utan meddelande om anskningsomgng.
Use of the crisis declaration meant that there was “imminent or immediate danger threatening to escalate into armed conflict”, and grants and procurement contracts could be negotiated without engaging in a call for proposals or tenders15. 
Tillmpningen av en frklaring om rdande krissituation innebar att det ansgs freligga en situation med Óverhngande eller omedelbar risk att trappas upp till vpnad[...] konflikt[...]Ó, och bidrag och upphandlingskontrakt kunde frhandlas utan fregende inbjudan att lmna frslag eller anbud15.
14 15 19 Article 190(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ L 362, 31.12.2012, p. 1). 
Till en brjan tillmpades frklaringen om rdande krissituation endast p de 14 15 Artikel 190.2 i kommissionens delegerade frordning (EU) nr 1268/2012 av den 29 oktober 2012 om tillmpningsfreskrifter fr Europaparlamentets och rdets frordning (EU, Euratom) nr 966/2012 om finansiella regler fr unionens allmnna budget (EUT L 362, 31.12.2012, s.
As defined in Article 128 of the Financial Regulation No 966/2012, Article 190(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on grants, Article 190 of the Financial Regulation No 966/2012, Article 266(1)(a) of Commission Regulation No 1268/2012 on services, Article 190 of the Financial Regulation No 966/2012, Article 268(1)(a) of Commission Regulation No 1268/2012 on supplies, Article 190 of the Financial Regulation No 966/2012 , Article 270(1)(a) of Commission Regulation No 1268/2012 on works. 
Ssom anges i artikel 128 i budgetfrordningen nr 966/2012, artikel 190.2 i kommissionens delegerade frordning nr 1268/2012 av den 29 oktober 2012 avseende bidrag, artikel 190 i budgetfrordningen nr 966/2012, artikel 266.1 a i kommissionens frordning nr 1268/2012 avseende tjnster, artikel 190 i budgetfrordningen nr 966/2012, artikel 268.1 a i kommissionens frordning nr 1268/2012 avseende varor, artikel 190 i budgetfrordningen nr 966/2012, artikel 270.1 a i kommissionens frordning nr 1268/2012 avseende byggentreprenader.
When assessing the Commission’s management of development assistance we found that the risk of double funding was in some cases significant but not mitigated (see Box 3). 45. 
Risken fr dubbelfinansiering motverkades inte tillrckligt 44 Nr vi bedmde kommissionens frvaltning av utvecklingsbistndet konstaterade vi att risken fr dubbelfinansiering i vissa fall var betydande och inte motverkades (se ruta 3).
20 Box 3 ‐ Examples of risks of double funding The 3MDG Fund covers three components: (1) Maternal, New‐born and Child Health; (2) Tuberculosis, Malaria and HIV/AIDS; (3) Systems Support. 
Ruta 3 Đ Exempel p risker fr dubbelfinansiering Fonden 3MDG omfattar tre delar: 1) hlso-och sjukvrdsinsatser fr mdrar, nyfdda och barn, 2) tuberkulos, malaria och hiv/aids, 3) systemstd.
Component 2 is also covered by the Global Fund, which is based in Geneva, Switzerland, operates worldwide, including in Myanmar/Burma, is co‐funded by the EU, and managed by UNOPS. 
Del 2 omfattas ocks av den globala fonden fr bekmpning av aids, tuberkulos och malaria med ste i Genve i Schweiz som r verksam ver hela vrlden inklusive i Myanmar/Burma och som medfinansieras av EU och frvaltas av Unops.
The 3MDG funding for Component 2 is specifically intended to complement that provided by the Global Fund in Myanmar/Burma, and to fill any gaps. 
Finansieringen frn 3MDG till del 2 r specifikt avsedd att komplettera finansieringen frn den globala fonden i Myanmar/Burma, och att fylla eventuella luckor.
However, there was no comprehensive assessment of the gaps and overlaps between the two Funds16. 
Det gjordes dock ingen vergripande bedmning av luckor och verlappningar mellan de tv fonderna16.
In another case one local NGO received EU support for capacity building from four different EU‐ funded sources in the absence of any assessment of possible funding overlaps. 
I ett annat fall fick en lokal icke-statlig organisation EU-std fr kapacitetsbyggande frn fyra olika EU-finansierade kllor utan att ngon bedmning gjordes av eventuella verlappningar i finansieringen.
Box 4 ‐ Examples of missed opportunities in terms of coordination In 2012 the World Bank committed more than 80 million USD to a “National Community Driven Development (CDD) Program”. 
22 Ruta 4 Đ Exempel p missade tillfllen till samordning r 2012 anslog Vrldsbanken mer n 80 miljoner US-dollar till ett program fr nationell samhllsdriven utveckling (National Community Driven Development (CDD) Program).
This programme was implemented through various government development structures, including township authorities. 
Programmet genomfrdes genom olika statliga utvecklingsstrukturer, inbegripet lokalsamhllens myndigheter.
21 In one region, the EU funded a project for five million euro that included a CDD component. 
I en region finansierade EU ett projekt fr fem miljoner euro som till en del rrde samhllsdriven utveckling.
A monitoring report noted that the initiatives had been implemented through the same stakeholders at township level. 
I en vervakningsrapport noterades att initiativen hade genomfrts genom samma berrda aktrer p lokalsamhllesniv.
This created parallel structures and serious overlaps, albeit that the communities benefited from additional investment in their infrastructure. 
Det skapade parallella strukturer och allvarliga verlappningar, ven om samhllena drog nytta av de ytterligare investeringarna i infrastrukturen.
In another region, the EU funded a project for seven million euro that also included a CDD component. 
I en annan region finansierade EU ett projekt fr sju miljoner euro som ven det till en del rrde samhllsdriven utveckling.
The monitoring report pointed to a lack of sector coordination and the risk of overlaps in this case as well. 
I vervakningsrapporten pekade man p bristande samordning inom sektorn och en risk fr verlappningar ven i detta fall.
Monitoring improved in the years after the EU Delegation had been set up, but there were still weaknesses. 47. It was impossible to assess whether the outputs and outcomes set at the level of an AAP had been attained, for two reasons: some of the AAPs examined did not have output or outcome indicators to allow the actions to be assessed; even where indicators were available, there were no aggregated data on the outputs and outcomes of the various actions carried out in each intervention sector under the AAPs. 
Det fanns brister i vervakningen av EU-finansierade tgrder och synligheten var lg 46 Kommissionens tgrder vervakades, rapporterades och utvrderades via projektrapporter, besk p plats, rapporter frn resultatorienterad vervakning, utvrderingar och revisioner. vervakningen frbttrades under ren efter det att EU-delegationen hade inrttats, men det fanns fortfarande svagheter. 47 Det var omjligt att bedma huruvida den output och det utfall som hade faststllts i ett rligt tgrdsprogram hade uppntts, av tv skl: vissa av de rliga tgrdsprogram som undersktes hade inga output-eller utfallsindikatorer som gjorde att tgrderna kunde bedmas, och ven dr det fanns indikatorer saknades sammanstllda data om output och
Some of the AAPs call for a performance‐monitoring committee to be set up for the actions funded. 
48 Fr vissa av de rliga tgrdsprogrammen krvs att en resultatvervakningskommitt inrttas fr de finansierade tgrderna.
In the cases audited this committee had either not been set up or had been set up late. 
I de granskade fallen hade en sdan kommitt antingen inte inrttats eller inrttats fr sent.
In addition, we noted weaknesses in monitoring in 50 % of the projects audited (see Annex IV), half of which comprised Trust Fund projects. 
Dessutom noterade vi brister i vervakningen i 50 % av de granskade projekten (se bilaga IV) varav hlften avsg frvaltningsfondsprojekt.
The Commission reacted slowly to verification mission reports 49. The Commission is a member of the boards of the LIFT, 3MDG and JPF Funds and of the QBEP’s steering committee. 
Kommissionen var sen med att reagera p rapporter frn kontrollbesk 49 Kommissionen r medlem i styrelserna fr fonderna LIFT, 3MDG och JPF samt i QBEP:s styrkommitt.
It also carries out verification missions at UN‐agencies. 
Den genomfr ocks kontrollbesk vid FN-organ.
The Commission initiated and reacted to verification mission reports slowly (see Box 5). 
Kommissionen var sen med att inleda kontrollbesk och reagera p rapporter frn dem (se ruta 5).
The level could be assessed in 10 of the projects audited, and in eight cases did not fully comply with the contractual provisions (see Annex IV). 
Synligheten kunde bedmas i tio av de granskade projekten, och i tta fall uppfylldes inte avtalsbestmmelserna fullt ut (se bilaga IV).
As an initiator of the Joint Peace Fund, the Commission played a major role in designing and setting it up. 
Som en av initiativtagarna till den gemensamma fredsfonden spelade kommissionen en viktig roll vid utformningen och inrttandet av fonden.
It had initially considered the option of an EU Trust Fund, but subsequently formally excluded it from the Fund design study because it had been unable to convince the other potential contributors of the merits of this option. 
kommissionen alternativet med en unionsfrvaltningsfond, men sedan strks det alternativet frn studien om fondens utformning eftersom man inte lyckats vertyga vriga potentiella bidragsgivare om frdelarna med detta alternativ.
The achievement of objectives was affected by implementation delays 52. In order to answer the third audit question (see paragraph 15) we assessed whether the actions delivered the planned outputs and achieved the expected outcomes. 
Uppnendet av mlen pverkades av frseningar i genomfrandet 52 Fr att f svar p den tredje revisionsfrgan (se punkt 15) bedmde vi huruvida tgrderna levererade planerad output och uppndde frvntat utfall.
The details of the projects audited are provided in Annex III and an overview of the assessment of the individual projects is presented in Annex IV. 
Detaljerade uppgifter om de granskade projekten finns i bilaga III och en versikt ver bedmningen av de enskilda projekten visas i bilaga IV.
The objectives of projects funded by the EU were to respond rapidly and flexibly across a range of areas relevant to Myanmar's political transition, and to support the development 22 Box 5 ‐ Verification missions LIFT The Commission carried out a verification mission in 2012 which detected ineligible costs amounting to 7.35 million euro. 
Vissa goda resultat trots den svra kontexten 53 Mlen med de projekt som finansierades av EU var att reagera snabbt och flexibelt inom en rad omrden som berrs av Myanmars politiska omstllning och att stdja den politiska utvecklingen p det ekonomiska och sociala omrdet.
Both external and internal factors had a negative impact on the delivery of results, and undermined the effectiveness of the projects funded. 
Bde externa och interna faktorer hade en negativ inverkan p de uppndda resultaten och undergrvde de finansierade projektens ndamlsenlighet.
Despite the difficult context, some of the projects we audited achieved good results (see Box 6). 
Trots den svra kontexten uppndde vissa av de projekt vi granskade goda resultat (se ruta 6).
23 Box 6 ‐ Examples of projects that achieved good results LIFT – Microfinance project The purpose of the project was to increase the access to loans and other financial services of over 100 000 low‐income clients in the country, at least half of whom are either women or reside in rural areas. 
24 Ruta 6 Đ Exempel p projekt som uppndde goda resultat LIFT Đ Mikrofinansieringsprojekt Projektets syfte var att ka tillgngen till ln och andra finansiella tjnster fr ver 100 000 lginkomstklienter i landet, varav minst hlften var antingen kvinnor eller bosatta i landsbygdsomrden.
LIFT provided microfinance institutions with support that allowed them to operate and continue providing services. 
LIFT gav std till mikrofinansinstitutioner som gjorde att de kunde bedriva sin verksamhet och fortstta att tillhandahlla tjnster.
The project was successful as many availed of the financing to start up or expand their activities. 
Projektet var framgngsrikt eftersom mnga drog nytta av finansieringen fr att starta eller utka sina verksamheter.