natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If the baseline could not be supported by evidence or historical data was missing, an action plan was required in the framework of general ex-ante conditionality 7. 
Om det saknades belgg fr utgngslget eller historiska uppgifter skulle medlemsstaten utarbeta en handlingsplan inom ramen fr det allmnna frhandsvillkoret 7. 178.
Reply of the Commission 98 178 The Commission considers that the indicators count different steps in a path towards inclusion/the labour market. 
Kommissionen anser att indikatorerna mter olika steg p vgen mot inkludering eller arbetsmarknaden.
In case the participant is supported by two consecutive interventions, that are the same, the completion of the YEI intervention and the reception of the offer are counted only once, upon leaving. 
Om deltagaren fr std genom tv p varandra fljande likadana insatser rknas 13 bara slutfrandet av insatsen under ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet och mottagandet av erbjudandet en gng, vid uttrdet.
In case the participant is supported under two different operations, and both are completed, then the participation would be counted twice as completing the YEI supported intervention and at least once as receiving an offer upon leaving the first intervention. 
Om deltagaren fr std genom tv olika insatser som bda slutfrs skulle deltagandet rknas tv gnger som slutfrande av en insats som stds genom ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet och minst en gng som mottagande av ett erbjudande vid uttrdet frn den frsta insatsen.
Recommendation 7 The Commission does not accept this recommendation. 
Rekommendation 7 Kommissionen godtar inte denna rekommendation.
179 The Commission notes that, in many cases, Member States had sufficient expenditure but were unable to claim it because they did not meet the necessary condition for submission of payment applications to the Commission (i.e. they had not yet designated the managing and certifying authorities). 
Kommissionen konstaterar att medlemsstaterna i mnga fall hade tillrckliga utgifter, men inte kunde gra ansprk p frskottet eftersom de inte uppfyllde kravet p att anskningar om utbetalning ska lmnas till kommissionen (drfr att de nnu inte hade utsett ngra frvaltningsmyndigheter eller attesterande myndigheter).
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 180 and 181 At this stage results should be read with caution and be regarded as preliminary. 
Kommissionens gemensamma svar avseende punkterna 180 och 181: P detta stadium br resultaten hanteras med frsiktighet och betraktas som preliminra.
Firstly, because operations may take longer than one or two years. 
Fr det frsta eftersom insatserna kan ta lngre tid n ett eller tv r.
Secondly, because many Member States prefer to report only on completed operations (as this options is allowed in accordance with the legal framework applicable to the YEI). 
Fr det andra eftersom mnga medlemsstater fredrar att vnta med rapporteringen tills insatserna r slutfrda (vilket den rttsliga ram som r tillmplig p ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet tillter).
It is also not possible to draw conclusions on the basis of the expenditure claimed to the Commission as financial implementation does not reflect implementation on the ground. 
Det gr inte heller att dra slutsatser utifrn de utgifter som redovisas till kommissionen, eftersom det finansiella genomfrandet inte terspeglar genomfrandet ute p fltet.
Reply of the Commission 99 181 Carrying out the first YEI evaluation by December 2015 was explicitly required by the Regulation, in light of eligibility of expenditure since September 2013. 
Att den frsta utvrderingen av ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet skulle gras senast i december 2015 var ett uttryckligt krav i frordningen, mot bakgrund av att utgifter sedan september 2013 var stdberttigande.
The Commission considers that the evaluation findings were useful to steer the programmes for the remaining period. 
Kommissionen anser att utvrderingsresultaten var anvndbara nr det gller att styra programmen fr den terstende perioden.
182 The Commission agrees that the measures should be tailored to the needs of the young persons and that the profiling of participants is very important. 
Kommissionen hller med om att tgrderna borde anpassas till ungdomarnas behov och att det r mycket viktigt att gra en profilering av deltagarna.
In this context, the Commission has provided guidance to Member States on the design of measures. 
Kommissionen har med tanke p detta gett medlemsstaterna vgledning om utformningen av tgrder.
Article 16 of the ESF Regulation determines that the YEI should target young people below 25 or below 30 that are not in employment, education or training. It does not impose any requirements on the specific groups that should be supported. 
Enligt artikel 16 i ESF-frordningen ska ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet inriktas p ungdomar som r yngre n 25 eller 30 r som varken arbetar eller studerar. Det finns inga krav p att specifika grupper ska stdjas.
Therefore, it is up to Member States to identify the target group of the YEI, within the limits set out in Article 16 of the ESF Regulation and in accordance with the reality in the Member State. 
Sledes r det medlemsstaterna som ska faststlla mlgrupperna fr 14 ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet inom de grnser som faststlls i artikel 16 i ESF-frordningen och med utgngspunkt frn situationen i respektive land.
As the YEI provides for a limited amount of resources, Member States decided to concentrate YEI resources on specific target groups and use the ESF for other measures targeting most difficult and hard to reach groups of young people. 
Eftersom det finns begrnsade resurser fr ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet har medlemsstaterna beslutat att koncentrera resurserna fr ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet till vissa mlgrupper och anvnda ESF fr andra tgrder som riktar sig till de ungdomsgrupper som det r svrast att n ut till och hjlpa.
Many of the measures targeting these vulnerable groups are programmed under investment priority 9i. 
Mnga av de tgrder som riktar sig till dessa utsatta grupper planeras under investeringsprioritet 9i.
EN 2017 Special Report NO 06 (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU) EU response to the refugee crisis: the ÔhotspotŐ approach 1977 - 2017 
SV 2017 Srskild rapport nr 06 EU:s svar p flyktingkrisen: systemet med mottagningscentrum (hotspots) (i enlighet med artikel 287.4 andra stycket i EUF-frdraget) 1977 - 2017
Audit team The ECAŐs special reports set out the results of its performance and compliance audits of specific budgetary areas or management topics. 
Granskningsteam I vra srskilda rapporter redovisar vi resultatet av vra effektivitets-och regelefterlevnadsrevisioner av srskilda budgetomrden eller frvaltningsteman.
The ECA selects and designs these audit tasks to be of maximum impact by considering the risks to performance or compliance, the level of income or spending involved, forthcoming developments and political and public interest. This performance audit was produced by Chamber III Đ headed by ECA Member Karel Pinxten - which specialises in external action, security and justice spending areas. 
Fr att uppn s stor effekt som mjligt vljer vi ut och utformar granskningsuppgifterna med hnsyn till riskerna nr det gller resultat eller regelefterlevnad, storleken p de aktuella inkomsterna eller utgifterna, framtida utveckling och politiskt intresse och allmnintresse. Denna effektivitetsrevision utfrdes av revisionsavdelning III Đ dr ledamoten Karel Pinxten r ordfrande Đ som r specialiserad p utgiftsomrdena yttre tgrder, skerhet och rttvisa.
The audit was led by ECA Members Hans Gustaf Wessberg and Istvan Szabolcs Fazakas, supported by Peter Eklund, Head of the Swedish private office and Emmanuel-Douglas Hellinakis, Attach; Mrton Baranyi, Attach of the Hungarian private office; Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch, Principal manager; Ruurd de Jong, Head of task; Wayne Codd, Jiri Lang, Karel Meixner and Cyril Messein, Auditors. 
Revisionsarbetet leddes av revisionsrttens ledamter Hans Gustaf Wessberg och Istvan Szabolcs Fazakas med std av Peter Eklund (chef fr det svenska kansliet) och Emmanuel-Douglas Hellinakis (attach), Mrton Baranyi (attach vid det ungerska kansliet), Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch (frstechef), Ruurd de Jong (uppgiftsansvarig), Wayne Codd, Jiri Lang, Karel Meixner och Cyril Messein (revisorer).
From left to right: Emmanuel-Douglas Hellinakis, Cyril Messein, Jiri Lang, Istvan Szabolcs Fazakas, Mrton Baranyi, Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch, Hans Gustaf Wessberg, Peter Eklund, Ruurd de Jong, Wayne Codd, Karel Meixner. 
Frn vnster till hger: Emmanuel-Douglas Hellinakis, Cyril Messein, Jiri Lang, Istvan Szabolcs Fazakas, Mrton Baranyi, Sabine Hiernaux-Fritsch, Hans Gustaf Wessberg, Peter Eklund, Ruurd de Jong, Wayne Codd och Karel Meixner.
The functioning of hotspots is affected by bottlenecks in the follow-up procedures Conclusions and recommendations Annex I - Timeline EU responses to the migration crisis Annex II - The 'Hotspot approach' CommissionŐs replies 75 - 83 84 - 89 3 
Flaskhalsar i uppfljningsfrfarandena pverkar p hur mottagningscentrumen fungerar 75Đ83 Slutsatser och rekommendationer 84Đ89 Bilaga I Đ Tidslinje ver EU:s svar p migrationskrisen Bilaga II Đ Systemet med mottagningscentrum (hotspots) Kommissionens svar 3
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVATIONS AMIF Asylum Migration and Integration Fund CEAS Common European Asylum System EASO European Asylum Support Office Europol European Police Office EURTF European Union Regional Task Force Frontex European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (as from October 2016: European Border and Coast Guard Agency) IOM International Organization for Migration ISF Internal Security Fund NGO Non-Governmental Organisation SOPs Standard Operating Procedures RIS Reception and Identification Service SRSS Structural Reform Support Service TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 4 
AKRONYMER OCH F RKORTNINGAR Amif Asyl-, migrations-och integrationsfonden Ceas det gemensamma europeiska asylsystemet Easo Europeiska stdkontoret fr asylfrgor EUF-frdraget Frdraget om Europeiska unionens funktionsstt Europol Europeiska polisbyrn EURTF Europeiska unionens regionala insatsstyrka Frontex Europeiska byrn fr frvaltningen av det operativa samarbetet vid Europeiska unionens yttre grnser (frn oktober 2016: Europeiska grns-och kustbevakningsbyrn) IOM Internationella organisationen fr migration RIS mottagnings-och identifieringsmyndigheten SRSS Stdtjnsten fr strukturreformer UNHCR Frenta nationernas hge flyktingkommissarie 4
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. Migration to Europe saw a sudden increase in the total number of arrivals, first in 2014 and even more so in 2015, when over 1 million people made the perilous journey across the Mediterranean to Europe as irregular migrants. 
SAMMANFATTNING I. Migrationen till Europa kade pltsligt Đ frst 2014 och nnu mer 2015 Đ nr ver en miljon mnniskor gjorde den farliga resan ver Medelhavet till Europa som irreguljra migranter.
In this report we look at a critical part of the management of the migration chain included in the May 2015 European Agenda on Migration: the ÔhotspotŐ approach. III. 
Vr rapport handlar om en kritisk del i hanteringen av migrationskedjan, som r en del av den europeiska migrationsagendan frn maj 2015: systemet med mottagningscentrum (hotspots) III.
The EU Member States are primarily responsible for all aspects of border control and asylum processing. 
Det r EU:s medlemsstater som i frsta hand ansvarar fr alla aspekter av grnskontroll och asylhantering.
The Commission therefore introduced this new ÔhotspotŐ approach in order to assist Greece and Italy, the frontline Member States, in coping with the sudden dramatic increase in irregular migrants arriving at their external borders in 2015/16. 
Kommissionen infrde drfr det nya systemet med mottagningscentrum fr att hjlpa Grekland och Italien Đ de medlemsstater som ligger i frontlinjen Đ att hantera den pltsliga och dramatiska kningen av antalet irreguljra migranter som anlnde till deras yttre grnser 2015 och 2016.
The aim of this approach was to provide operational support to Member States to ensure arriving migrants were identified, registered and fingerprinted, and channelled into the relevant follow-up procedures. 
Syftet med systemet var att ge medlemsstaterna operativt std fr att se till att de migranter som anlnde identifierades, registrerades och lmnade fingeravtryck, och drefter slussades vidare till rtt uppfljningsfrfarande.
Overall, we found that the hotspot approach has helped improve migration management in the two frontline Member States, under very challenging and constantly changing circumstances, by increasing their reception capacities, improving registration procedures, and by strengthening the coordination of support efforts. 
Generellt konstaterade vi att systemet med mottagningscentrum, under mycket svra och konstant vxlande frhllanden, har underlttat migrationshanteringen i de tv medlemsstater som ligger i frontlinjen genom att ka deras mottagningskapacitet, frbttra registreringsfrfarandena och strka samordningen av stdinsatser.
In both countries, the selection of the hotspot locations rightly took into account the main entry points and the availability of existing structures. 
I bda lnderna tog man p ett korrekt stt hnsyn till de vanligaste inresestllena och tillgngen till befintliga strukturer nr man bestmde var mottagningscentrumen skulle ligga.
However, setting them up took longer than planned. 
Det tog dock lngre tid n planerat att f igng dem.
In Greece, four of the five planned hotspots were operational in March 2016, with the last one coming into operation by June 2016. 
I Grekland var fyra av de fem planerade mottagningscentrumen operativa i mars 2016, och det sista kom igng i juni 2016.
In Italy, four out of six planned hotspots were operational in March 2016, and two additional hotpots were still in the process of being set up but not yet operational at the end of February 2017. 
I Italien var fyra av sex planerade mottagningscentrum operativa i mars 2016, och ytterligare tv mottagningscentrum hll fortfarande p att sttas upp men hade inte brjat anvndas i slutet av februari 2017.
Despite considerable support from the EU, at the end of 2016 the reception facilities in both countries were not yet adequate to properly receive (Italy) or accommodate (Greece) the number of migrants arriving. 
Trots ansenligt std frn EU hade mottagningsanlggningarna i de bda lnderna i slutet av 2016 nnu inte kapacitet att p ett lmpligt stt ta emot (Italien) eller inkvartera (Grekland) alla de migranter som anlnde.
There was still a shortage of adequate facilities to accommodate and process unaccompanied minors in line with international standards, both in the hotspots and at the next level of reception. 
Det rdde fortfarande brist p lmpliga anlggningar fr att inkvartera och hantera ensamkommande barn i enlighet med internationella normer, bde vid mottagningscentrumen och i nsta led i mottagandet.
V. The Commission and the relevant EU Agencies supported the efforts of the Member States by providing experts, financial and technical resources, advice and coordination. 
6 V. Kommissionen och de berrda EU-byrerna stdde medlemsstaternas anstrngningar genom att tillhandahlla experter, ekonomiska och tekniska resurser, rd och samordning.
AgenciesŐ capacity to provide such support was and remains very dependent on the resources offered by Member States. 
Byrernas kapacitet att tillhandahlla sdant std var och r i hg grad beroende av de resurser som medlemsstaterna stller till frfogande.
Additionally, the duration of expert deployments was often very short, thereby reducing the efficiency of the deployed experts. 
Vidare var experterna ofta utplacerade mycket kort tid, vilket minskade deras effektivitet.
These shortcomings are currently being addressed through the new (or envisaged) mandates for the relevant Agencies. 
Bristerna hller fr nrvarande p att tgrdas med hjlp av de berrda byrernas nya (eller planerade) mandat.
Italy has established hotspot standard operating procedures and applies them both in the hotspots and in other disembarkation ports functioning as hotspots. 
Italien har faststllt standardrutiner fr mottagningscentrum och tillmpar dem bde vid mottagningscentrumen och i andra landstigningshamnar som fungerar som mottagningscentrum.
Coordination at the individual hotspot level is still fragmented and although it has been established that the central authorities in the Member States are responsible for the overall management of the hotspots, at least in Greece, they have yet to take on this responsibility in full. 
Samordningen vid varje mottagningscentrum r fortfarande splittrad, och ven om det har faststllts att medlemsstatens centrala myndigheter ansvarar fr den vergripande frvaltningen av mottagningscentrumen har de nnu inte, tminstone inte i Grekland, tagit p sig ansvaret fullt ut.
Monitoring and reporting by the Commission on the progress and problems at the hotspots has been regular and extensive, but some information is not shared between different stakeholders, and reporting on some key performance indicators is lacking. 
Kommissionens uppfljning och rapportering om framsteg och problem vid mottagningscentrumen har varit regelbunden och omfattande, men en del av informationen delas inte mellan olika aktrer, och det saknas rapportering om ngra nyckelresultatindikatorer.
In both Greece and Italy, the hotspot approach ensured that, in 2016, most of the arriving migrants were properly identified, registered and fingerprinted and that their data were checked against relevant security databases. 
Tack vare systemet med mottagningscentrum blev de flesta migranter som anlnde till Grekland och Italien 2016 korrekt identifierade, registrerade och fick lmna fingeravtryck, och deras uppgifter kontrollerades mot relevanta skerhetsdatabaser.
In this respect the hotspot approach contributed towards an improved management of the migration flows. 
Mottagningscentrumen bidrog i detta avseende till att frvaltningen av migrationsfldena frbttrades.
The hotspot approach further requires that migrants be channelled into appropriate follow-up procedures, i.e. a national asylum application, relocation to another Member State (where appropriate) or return to the country of origin (or transit). 
I systemet med mottagningscentrum ska migranter ocks slussas vidare till lmpliga uppfljningsfrfaranden, det vill sga till det nationella asylfrfarandet, omplacering till en annan medlemsstat (i frekommande fall) eller tervndande till ursprungslandet (eller transiteringslandet).
We make a number of recommendations for the Commission to assist the Member States in improving the hotspot approach as regards hotspot capacity, the treatment of 6 7 unaccompanied minors, the deployment of experts and roles and responsibilities in the hotspot approach. 
Vi lmnar ett antal rekommendationer till kommissionen om hur den kan hjlpa medlemsstaterna att frbttra systemet med mottagningscentrum i frga om mottagningscentrumens kapacitet, behandlingen av ensamkommande barn, utplaceringen av experter samt roller och ansvarsomrden inom systemet.
We also recommend the Commission to evaluate and further develop the hotspot approach, in view of optimising EU assistance towards migration management. 
Vi rekommenderar ven att kommissionen utvrderar och utvecklingar systemet med mottagningscentrum ytterligare fr att optimera EU-stdet till migrationshantering.
Migration to Europe saw a sudden increase in the total number of arrivals, first in 2014 and even more so in 2015, when over 1 million people crossed the Mediterranean to Europe as irregular migrants1. 
Migrationen till Europa kade pltsligt Đ frst 2014 och nnu mer 2015 Đ nr ver en miljon mnniskor korsade Medelhavet fr att komma till Europa som irreguljra migranter1.
These migratory flows at the EUŐs external borders generally consisted of a mixture of asylum seekers and economic migrants. 
Migrationsfldena till EU:s yttre grnser bestod i allmnhet av en blandning av asylskande och ekonomiska migranter.
In addition, many were children and unaccompanied minors in need of particular attention and care. 
Dessutom var mnga barn eller ensamkommande barn som behvde srskild uppmrksamhet och omsorg.
Whereas in 2014, most migrants arrived through the ÔCentral Mediterranean routeŐ (i.e. leaving northern Africa and arriving in Italy), this pattern changed during 2015, with a total of around 850 000 people coming through the ÔEastern Mediterranean routeŐ (i.e. departing from Turkey and arriving in Greece; see Figure 1).The prolonged crisis in Syria has been a major factor behind the increase in the arrivals from Turkey, as can be seen from the nationality chart in Figure 2. 
Under 2014 fljde de flesta migranter den centrala Medelhavsrutten (dvs. frn Nordafrika till Italien), men under 2015 ndrades mnstret och totalt 850 000 personer kom lngs den stra Medelhavsrutten (dvs. frn Turkiet till Grekland, se figur 1). Den utdragna krisen i Syrien har p ett avgrande stt bidragit till att antalet migranter frn Turkiet har kat, vilket framgr av nationalitetsdiagrammet i figur 2.
The large inflow into Greece fell significantly from April 2016 onwards, while arrivals to Italy remained around the previous yearsŐ level, with total sea arrivals in Italy and Greece reaching some 350 000 people for the year 2016. 
Det stora infldet till Grekland minskade betydligt frn och med april 2016, medan ungefr lika mnga migranter kom till Italien som ret innan. Totalt kom ungefr 350 000 personer sjvgen till Italien och Grekland under 2016.
A timeline for the EUŐs response to the migration crisis can be found in Annex I. 8 1 According to the IOM, there is no universally accepted definition of what constitutes irregular migrations. 
En tidslinje ver EU:s svar p migrationskrisen finns i bilaga 1. 8 1 Enligt IOM finns det ingen allmnt accepterad definition av irreguljr migration.
From the perspective of destination countries, it is entry, stay or work in a country without the necessary authorization or documents required under the immigration regulations. 
Fr mottagarlnderna innebr det inresa, uppehll eller arbete i ett land utan de ndvndiga tillstnd eller handlingar som krvs enligt immigrationsreglerna.
Figure 1 Đ Irregular arrivals by sea in Greece and Italy, 2009-2016 9 1 200 000 1 000 000 800 000 600 000 400 000 200 000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: Frontex. 
Figur 1 Đ Irreguljra inresor sjvgen till Grekland och Italien, 2009Đ2016 9 1 200 000 1 000 000 800 000 600 000 400 000 200 000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Klla: Frontex.
Number of persons 
Antal personer
Figure 2 - Main nationalities of arriving migrants Đ 2016 Greece Italy 10 Algeria 1% Palestine 1% Others 4% Iran 3% Pakistan 5% Iraq 15% Afghanistan 24% Syria 47% Others 22% Somalia 4% Bangladesh 4% Sudan 5% Mali 6% Senegal 6% Nigeria 21% Eritrea 11% Guinea 7% Cte d'Ivoire 7% Gambia 7% Source: Frontex. 
Figur 2 Đ De vanligaste nationaliteterna bland de migranter som anlnde 2016 Grekland Italien 10 Algeriet 1% Palestina 1% Iran 3% Pakistan 5% Irak 15% Afghanistan 24% vriga 4% Syrien 47% vriga 22% Somalia 4% Bangladesh4% Sudan 5% Mali 6% Nigeria 21% Eritrea 11% Guinea 7% Elfenbenskusten 7% Gambia 7% Senegal 6% Klla: Frontex.
Policy framework Common European Asylum System 4. 
Politisk ram Det gemensamma europeiska asylsystemet 4.
Asylum is granted to people who are fleeing persecution or serious harm in their own country and are therefore in need of international protection. 
Asyl beviljas personer som flyr frn frfljelse eller allvarlig skada i hemlandet och drfr r i behov av internationellt skydd.