natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Significant corrections may be made over the next two years (2000 and 2001) as a result of the work on long outstanding 2.3.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 69/23 debts by OLAF (see paragraph 16). 
Vsentliga rttelser fr gras under de tv fljande ren (2000Đ2001) till fljd av det arbete som OLAF utfrt med avseende p sedan lnge utestende fordringar (se punkt 16). Andra Budgetr Den rliga attesteringen av utbetalningsstllenas rkenskaper
Other corrections resulting from the clearance unitŐs conformity audits are also likely to increase the total value of corrections in the short term. 
2.3.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 69/23 rttelser som r resultatet av granskningar av verensstmmelse som utfrts av enheten fr avslutande av rkenskaperna kar troligen rttelsernas totala vrde p kort sikt.
Disjunctions 81. 
Avskiljande 81.
There are two reasons for disjoining expenditure from the financial clearance decision that must be taken by 30 April: the Certifying Body has issued a qualified certificate with serious weaknesses and/or the work of the Certifying Body is not satisfactory/sufficient (the Commission needs more information on some points and asks for complementary work to be carried out). 
Det finns tv anledningar till att avskilja utgifter frn det finansiella beslutet om godknnande av rkenskaperna som skall fattas senast den 30 april: Det attesterande organet har utfrdat ett intyg med reservation som har allvarliga svagheter och/eller det attesterande organets arbete r inte tillfredsstllande/tillrckligt (kommissionen behver ytterligare information p vissa punkter och begr att ytterligare arbete skall utfras).
Once satisfied, a second financial clearance decision must be taken. 
Nr arbetet vl utfrts p ett tillfredsstllande stt skall ett andra finansiellt beslut om godknnande av rkenskaperna fattas.
For each of the years 1996 to 1998 there have been significant disjunctions (28 500 million euro in total). 
Fr vart och ett av ren 1996 till 1998 har vsentliga belopp avskiljts (totalt 28 500 euro).
The huge amounts involved are due to the fact that all the expenditure declared by the paying agency is disjoined, even though only part of it is called into question. 
De enorma belopp det handlar om beror p att alla utgifter som utbetalningsstllet deklarerat avskiljs, ven om endast en del av dem r omtvistade.
The time taken to clear the expenditure disjoined under the April financial decision has increased from three to 10 months (see Table 1). 
Den tid det tar att godknna de utgifter som avskilts i det finansiella beslutet i april har kat frn tre till tio mnader (se tabell 1).
Late payments to beneficiaries 82. 
Frsenade betalningar till stdmottagare 82.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 296/96 (1) explains how payments to Member States must be reduced when they have failed to make the payments by the deadlines set by the Commission (a 4 % tolerance is allowed under the Regulation). 
I kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 296/96 (1) frklaras hur betalningar till medlemsstaterna mste minskas nr de inte har verkstllt betalningarna inom de tidsfrister som kommissionen faststllt (enligt frordningen tillts en avvikelse p 4 %).
Adjustments for late payments are shown in Table 6. 
Justeringar fr frsenade betalningar visas i tabell 6.
For the period 1994 to 1998, they represent just 8 % of the total value initially determined by the system. 
Fr 1994 till 1998 motsvarar de endast 8 % av det totala vrde som ursprungligen faststllts av systemet.
Member States have put forward many reasons why they should not be penalised for making late payments and these have been accepted by the Commission. 
Medlemsstaterna har frt fram mnga argument fr att de inte borde pfras sanktioner fr att de verkstllt betalningar sent, och kommissionen har accepterat dessa.
For example, in 1996, of the 271,7 million euro initially calculated, only 25,2 million euro was retained by the Commission in its third conformity decision. 
Under 1996 innehll kommissionen exempelvis endast 25,2 miljoner euro av de 271,7 miljoner euro som ursprungligen berknats i det tredje beslutet om verensstmmelse.
Reductions were decided on an Ôad-hocŐ basis, given the information sent by the Member States which was accepted by the Commission after many discussions and review of the supporting documents. 
Minskningar beslutades frn fall till fall, utifrn den information som medlemsstaterna skickat in och som kommissionen accepterade efter mnga diskussioner och efter granskning av verifierande underlag.
The reductions relate to bookkeeping errors (53 million euro for Greece); an extension granted to Italy to carry out supplementary controls asked for by the Commission (154 million euro); and an increase in delays in (1) Commission Regulation (EC) No 296/96 of 16 February 1996, on data to be forwarded by the Member States and the monthly booking of expenditure financed under the Guarantee Section of EAGGF and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2776/88 (OJ L 39, 17.2.1996, p. 
Minskningarna avser bokfringsfel (53 miljoner euro fr Grekland): Italien beviljades en frlngning fr genomfrande av ytterligare kontroller som kommissionen hade begrt (154 miljo-(1) Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 296/96 av den 16 februari 1996 om de uppgifter som medlemsstaterna skall snda in fr mnatlig bokfring av de utgifter som finansieras genom garantisektionen vid Europeiska utvecklings-och garantifonden fr jordbruket (EUGFJ) och upphvande av frordning (EEG) nr 2776/88 (EGT L 39 17.2.1996, s.
5). respect of problems encountered when changing the payments system for the United Kingdom. 
5). ner euro) och i Frenade kungariket frlngdes tidsfristerna p grund av problem som uppstod nr man bytte betalningssystem.
It is the CommissionŐs task to assess the justifications for late payments put forward by the Member States. 
Det r kommissionens uppgift att bedma medlemsstaternas motiveringar till de frsenade betalningarna.
However, this aspect of the work is considered to be low risk by the Commission and consequently is not given priority. 
Kommissionen anser emellertid att denna del av arbetet medfr liten risk, varfr det inte prioriteras.
Despite the fact that since 1996 the sums initially determined by the system are far greater than the total value of the corrections made, this aspect has received little attention. 
Trots att de summor som ursprungligen faststllts av systemet sedan 1996 r mycket strre n det totala vrdet fr gjorda rttelser har denna aspekt gnats liten uppmrksamhet.
Discharge 85. 
Ansvarsfrihet 85.
One of the major criticisms of the old system was the time it took to clear the accounts and consequently to grant discharge. 
En av de viktigaste punkterna i kritiken mot det gamla systemet rrde den tid det tog att godknna rkenskaperna och drefter bevilja ansvarsfrihet.
Table 1 shows that the introduction of the reformed system has not yet had an impact on the time taken to clear the accounts. 
Tabell 1 visar att infrandet av det reformerade systemet inte nnu har pverkat hur lng tid det tar att avsluta rkenskaperna.
It is too early to say what impact, if any, the reformed clearance procedure will have on the discharge. 
Det r fr tidigt att sga om det reformerade frfarandet vid avslutande av rkenskaperna kommer att pverka beviljandet av ansvarsfrihet och i s fall p vilket stt.
The discharge for the EAGGF 1993 to 1995 was granted by the Parliament in July 2000. 
Parlamentet beslutade i juli 2000 att bevilja ansvarsfrihet fr EUGFJ fr perioden 1993Đ1995.
1996 has yet to be considered by the discharge authority despite the fact that the financial clearance was completed in July 1997. 
Den myndighet som beviljar ansvarsfrihet har nnu inte behandlat r 1996 trots att det finansiella godknnandet av rkenskaperna blev klart i juli 1997.
CONCLUSIONS 87. 
SLUTSATSER 87.
There are still too many paying agencies and the number is likely to increase. 
Det finns fortfarande alltfr mnga utbetalningsstllen och antalet kommer frmodligen att ka.
The Commission should encourage Member States to rationalise their paying agency structure. 
Kommissionen br uppmuntra medlemsstaterna att rationalisera strukturen fr utbetalningsstllen.
Some paying agencies are poorly defined and too many fail to meet all of the accreditation criteria (see paragraphs 9 to 12). 
Vissa utbetalningsstllen r bristflligt definierade och det finns alltfr mnga som inte uppfyller ackrediteringskriterierna (se punkterna 9Đ12).
The latter is of particular concern where these are amongst the largest in expenditure terms (see paragraphs 13 to 25). 
Detta r srskilt oroande d dessa r bland dem som r strst om man ser till utgifterna (se punkterna 13Đ25).
Delegation of tasks and obtaining the necessary assurance that customs controls have been satisfactorily performed continue to cause major problems (see paragraphs 20 to 22). 
Delegeringen av uppgifter och erhllandet av ndvndig skerhet om att tullkontroller utfrts p ett tillfredsstllande stt fortstter att ge stora problem (se punkterna 20Đ22).
The Court considers that the conciliation procedure has been insufficiently effective and that the Conciliation Body should take a clear position on all cases presented to it and come up with concrete suggestions with regard to the level of correction that should be applied. 
Revisionsrtten anser att frlikningsfrfarandet inte har varit tillrckligt verkningsfullt och att frlikningsorganet br inta en tydlig stndpunkt vad gller alla fall som frelggs den och lmna konkreta frslag angende hur stora rttelser som br gras.
The total amount of corrections for a given year has so far been lower under the reformed system than it was under the old (see paragraph 74). 
Det totala beloppet fr rttelserna fr ett visst r har hittills varit lgre med det reformerade systemet n det var med det gamla (se punkt 74).
This is partly due to the fact that not all of the conformity decisions affecting 1996 have yet been taken. 
Detta beror delvis p att alla beslut om verensstmmelse fr 1996 nnu inte har fattats.
Other factors that may also have an impact are: better pre-payment C 69/24 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.3.2001 controls (IACS) (see paragraph 78); the 24-month rule; the fact that errors found by the Certifying Bodies are not used as the basis for corrections if the Member States take appropriate action; the effect of the Conciliation Body. 
Andra faktorer som ocks kan ha betydelse r bttre kontroller fre betalning (IACS) (se punkt 78), 24-mnadersregeln, det faktum att fel som C 69/24 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 2.3.2001 upptcks av attesterande organ inte anvnds som underlag fr rttelser om medlemsstaterna vidtar lmpliga tgrder och frlikningsorganets inverkan.
It is therefore inappropriate to draw a negative conclusion from the lower level of corrections. 
Det r drfr fel att dra negativa slutsatser utifrn den lga nivn p rttelser.
There is no evidence that the reformed clearance procedure has accelerated the timescale for clearing overall expenditure for a given year in terms of financial correctness and conformity decisions. 
Det finns inga bevis fr att det reformerade frfarandet vid avslutande av rkenskaperna har pskyndat det vergripande godknnandet av utgifterna fr ett givet r i form av beslut om ekonomisk korrekthet och om verensstmmelse med bestmmelser.
More than three years have passed since the first year of the reformed system (1996) and the final conformity decision has yet to be taken. 
Det har gtt mer n tre r sedan det reformerade systemets frsta r (1996) och man har fortfarande inte fattat det slutliga beslutet om verensstmmelse.
The accreditation and certification (see paragraph 77) requirements have greatly improved Member State accountability This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in for EAGGF funds although there is scope for improvement on both fronts. 
Kraven fr ackreditering och attestering (se punkt 77) har i stor utstrckning frbttrat medlemsstaternas ansvarsskyldighet fr EUGFJ-medel, ven om det finns utrymme fr frbttringar p bda omrdena.
There has been an improvement in the overall quality of the reports produced by the Certifying Bodies for the years 1996 to 1998. 
Det har skett en frbttring av den vergripande kvaliteten i rapporterna frn de attesterande organen fr ren 1996 till 1998.
This is partly attributable to greater and more precise guidance from the Commission and also to experience gained by the Certifying Bodies during the course of their work. 
Detta beror delvis p fler och tydligare riktlinjer frn kommissionen och ven p den erfarenhet som de attesterande organ ftt under sitt arbete.
However, there is scope for further improvement and harmonisation, in particular with regard to the application of sampling techniques and error identification, classification and evaluation (see paragraphs 33 to 46). 
Det finns emellertid utrymme fr ytterligare frbttring och harmonisering, srskilt vad gller anvndningen av urvalsmetoder och identifiering, klassificering och utvrdering av fel (se punkterna 33Đ47).
Despite these weaknesses, the reform of the clearance of accounts procedure has been a success. 
Trots dessa svagheter har reformen av frfarandet vid avslutande av rkenskaperna varit framgngsrik.
Luxembourg at its meeting of 29 and 30 November 2000. 
Denna rapport har antagits av revisionsrtten vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 29 och 30 november 2000.
2.3.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 69/25 SUMMARY Context The reform of the clearance of accounts process has been a major undertaking for the Commission and for the Member States. 
2.3.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 69/25 SAMMANFATTNING Bakgrund Reformen av avslutandet av rkenskaperna var en stor utmaning fr kommissionen och medlemsstaterna.
In many cases it required considerable changes by the Member States. 
I mnga fall krvdes omfattande frndringar i medlemsstaterna.
The Commission agrees with the Court that there have been major improvements in accountability, transparency and performance. 
Kommissionen instmmer med revisionsrtten om att stora frbttringar gjorts avseende ansvarsskyldighet, ppenhet och resultat.
But further improvements still have to be made. It is, however, extremely difficult to take a photograph of the position at any time as improvements and developments are continually ongoing. 
Det finns dock ytterligare frbttringar att gra. Det r emellertid ytterst svrt att beskriva lget vid en viss tidpunkt eftersom frbttringarna och utvecklingen kontinuerligt pgr.
The Commission services will continue to review the respect of the accreditation criteria, through its own efforts and via the annual examination of the Certifying BodiesŐ reports. 
Kommissionen kommer att fortstta att vervaka att ackrediteringsvillkoren iakttas, bde genom egna strvanden och via den rliga granskningen av rapporterna frn de attesterande organen.
A new reporting standard for 1999 has standardised and improved reporting, particularly on sampling and error evaluation. 
En ny standard fr rapporteringen under 1999 har kat kvaliteten och frbttrat rapporteringen, srskilt vad avser stickprovstagning och utvrdering av fel.
The examination of the Court was in many ways complementary to the ongoing work of the Commission. 
Revisionsrttens granskning kompletterade p flera stt kommissionens pgende arbete.
The Court concentrated on the detailed operation of Certifying Bodies, while the Commission has spent more time on examining the operation of the paying agencies. 
Revisionsrtten inriktade sig p en detaljerad granskning av de attesterande organens transaktioner, medan kommissionen gnade mer tid t att granska utbetalningsstllenas transaktioner.
The CourtŐs observations have been taken into account in the examination of the 1999 reports. 
Revisionsrttens iakttagelser har beaktats vid granskningen av 1999 rs rapporter.
The Commission would like to thank the Court for its assistance in this respect. 
Kommissionen nskar framfra sitt tack till revisionsrtten fr dess hjlp i detta avseende.
Accreditation The legislative authority decided that the number of paying agencies should be decided by the Member States. 
Ackreditering Den lagstiftande myndigheten beslutade att antalet utbetalningsstllen skulle faststllas av medlemsstaterna.
The Commission has, however, encouraged the Member States to reduce this number and some have done so. 
Kommissionen har dock uppmanat medlemsstaterna att minska antalet utbetalningsstllen, vilket ocks skett i vissa fall.
The Certifying Bodies The Court states that four Certifying Bodies failed to comply with the independence requirement. 
De attesterande organen Revisionsrtten uppger att fyra attesterande organ misslyckades med att uppfylla kravet p oberoende.
The Commission does not think that the use by the Certifying Bodies of the internal audits conducted by the paying agencies is inappropriate; however, the certification can be improved in order to comply more closely with international audit standards and to provide appropriate documentary back-up. 
Kommissionen anser det inte olmpligt att de attesterande organen anvnder sig av kontroller som utfrs genom utbetalningsstllenas interna kontroll. Attesteringen kan dock frbttras s att den i hgre grad verensstmmer med internationella redovisningsstandarder och dokumenteras p lmpligt stt.
The Court notes (paragraph 29) that the Commission has now resolved the problem. 
Revisionsrtten konstaterar (se punkt 29) att kommissionen under tiden har lst dessa problem.
The Commission believes that it is far too simplistic to take the amount of expenditure declared by paying agencies with qualified accounts and use this as a performance measure. 
Kommissionen anser att det r alltfr frenklat att ta upp de utgiftsbelopp som de attesterande organen har deklarerat med de rkenskaper som r frsedda med reservation och anvnda dessa som resultatmtt.
It is important to examine each qualification individually before making judgements on this point. 
Det r viktigt att granska varje reservation enskilt innan ngra yttranden avges i denna frga.
The conciliation procedure In the clearance of accounts procedure the Commission has very substantial powers. 
Frlikningsfrfarandet Vid frfarandet fr avslutande av rkenskaper har kommissionen mycket stora befogenheter.
Firstly it is responsible for auditing and evaluating the Member StatesŐ management of EAGGF Guarantee expenditure, and, secondly, it is the institution which unilaterally decides on the amounts to refuse for financing. 
Den r frst och frmst ansvarig fr granskningen av rkenskaperna och utvrderingen av medlemsstaternas frvaltning av utgifterna fr EUGFJ:s garantisektion och i andra hand r det den institution som unilateralt fattar beslut om de belopp som skall vgras finansiering.
In a system of this kind, as in any auditing system, it is important that the auditee has the right to have his views heard and also to question the strength of the arguments of the auditors. 
I ett system av detta slag r det, som inom varje gransknings-system, viktigt att den som granskas har rtt att f sina sikter hrda samt ven ifrgastta kraften bakom revisorernas argument.
This is in part guaranteed through an exchange of views and information in the bilateral procedure between the Member State and the Commission. 
Detta garanteras delvis genom ett utbyte av sikter och information i det bilaterala frfarandet mellan medlemsstaterna och kommissionen.
The examination of the strength of the arguments advanced by the Commission is further ensured by the existence of the Conciliation Body, which also functions as a kind of external quality control on the work performed by the Commission auditors. 
Granskningen av kraften bakom de argument som kommissionen lagt fram skerstlls ytterligare genom frlikningsorganets existens, som ocks fungerar som en sorts extern kvalitetskontroll av det arbete som utfrts av kommissionens revisorer.
The conciliation procedure is thus, in the view of the Commission, an important and necessary part of the clearance of accounts. 
Frlikningsfrfarandet r drfr, enligt kommissionen, en viktig och ndvndig del av avslutandet av rkenskaperna.
The assessment that the Conciliation Body has largely failed to reconcile the opposing views can be considered too negative. 
Bedmningen att frlikningsorganet i stor utstrckning har misslyckats med att frlika de motsatta sikterna mste anses alltfr negativ.
In view of the large financial amounts in question, it is understandable that an agreement between the Commission and the Member State is rarely reached. 
Till fljd av de betydande ekonomiska beloppen i frga r det frsteligt att en verenskommelse mellan kommissionen och medlemsstaten sllan ns.
The Commission is legally obliged to exclude expenditure from Community financing where that expenditure has not been effected in compliance with Community rules and therefore cannot accept compromises on the calculation of corrections that would not be compatible with this obligation. On the other hand, the national authorities will not accept any limits on their right to approach the Court of Justice, which does open an additional possibility to cancel or to reduce the correction. 
Kommissionen r enligt lagen skyldig att utesluta utgifter frn gemenskapsfinansiering nr dessa utgifter inte genomfrts i verensstmmelse med gemenskapens regler och kan drfr inte godta kompromisser vid berkningen av rttelser som inte verensstmmer med denna skyldighet.  andra sidan kommer inte de nationella myndigheterna att godta ngra inskrnkningar av deras rtt att vnda sig till EG-domstolen, vilket ger nnu en mjlighet att annullera eller minska rttelsen.
It should be underlined that the conclusions of the Conciliation Body are always supported by detailed reports, and often conclude that the Commission should take into consideration certain arguments or elements of fact which have an impact on the level of the correction. 
Det br understrykas att frlikningsorganets slutsatser alltid stds av detaljerade rapporter, och ofta dras slutsatsen att kommissionen br vervga vissa argument eller faktainslag som kan pverka nivn p rttelsen.
However, the Conciliation Body is not always in a position to calculate precisely the amount of the modified correction. THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES 
Frlikningsorganet kan dock inte alltid berkna det exakta beloppet fr den ndrade rttelsen. KOMMISSIONENS SVAR
C 69/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 2.3.2001 In cases where the Commission services do not agree with the Conciliation BodyŐs conclusion, this is justified in the Summary Report and the Member States have the possibility to discuss it in the EAGGF Committee. 
C 69/26 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 2.3.2001 Nr kommissionen inte instmmer i frlikningsorganets slutsatser, motiveras detta i den sammanfattande rapporten och medlemsstaterna har mjlighet att diskutera dem i EUGFJ-kommittn.
Clearance decisions The amount of time available to examine the accounts and certificates is limited. 
Beslut om avslutande av rkenskaperna Den tid som finns till frfogande fr att granska rkenskaperna och attesteringarna r begrnsad.
If there are uncertainties or outstanding questions then the Commission considers that it is prudent to disjoin accounts. 
Om oskerheter eller olsta frgor frekommer anser kommissionen det klokt att avskilja rkenskaperna.
Conclusion Concerning the overall timescale for the conformity procedure, the Commission accepts that the last corrections for the 1996 year will not be made any quicker than under the old procedure. 
Slutsatser Betrffande frlikningsfrfarandets vergripande tidsplan medger kommissionen att de sista rttelserna fr r 1996 inte kommer att genomfras snabbare n under det tidigare frfarandet.