natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the rest of the EU, mammalian MBM continued to be allowed for use in feed for other farm animals (4), as long as minimum processing standards were in place (see paragraph 28). 
I resten av EU var det dock fortfarande tilltet att anvnda ktt-och benmjl frn dggdjur i foder till andra djur inom animalieproduktion (4) s lnge minimikraven p bearbetning fljdes (se punkt 28).
The International Scientific Conference on MBM in 1997 considered whether there was a need for EU legislation to ensure that the raw materials for MBM are safely sourced, (i.e. to exclude animals dying on farm or in transit and all condemned materials from the animal feed chain, so that only material declared fit for human consumption could be used for the production of animal feed). 
Vid den internationella vetenskapliga konferensen om ktt-och benmjl 1997 vervgdes om det fanns behov av EU-lagstiftning fr att skerstlla att rmaterialet fr ktt-och benmjl hrstammade frn skra kllor (dvs. att hindra djur som dtt p grden eller under transport och allt utdmt material frn att komma in i djurfoderkedjan s att endast material som frklarats godtagbart att anvndas som livsmedel kan anvndas i tillverkningen av djurfoder).
Relevant legislation to remove animal tissues which could present a BSE risk from the food and feed chains did not enter into force until October 2000 (5); legislation to remove animals dying on farm or in transit and all cadavers from the animal feed chain entered into force in March 2001 (6). 
Lagstiftning fr att avlgsna djurvvnad som kunde medfra risk fr BSE ur livsmedels-och foderkedjan trdde inte i kraft frrn i oktober 2000 (5), lagstiftning fr att avlgsna djur som dr p grden eller under transporten och alla kadaver frn foderkedjan trdde i kraft i mars 2001 (6).
The 1996 crisis in the United Kingdom showed that the inadequate implementation of the 1988 feed ban resulted in 36 000 (reported) BSE cases in animals born after the United Kingdom ban (by the time of Special Report No 19/98). 
Krisen i Frenade kungariket 1996 visade att den bristflliga tillmpningen av 1988 rs foderfrbud ledde till 36 000 (rappor-terade) BSE-fall hos djur fdda efter det att Frenade kungarikets frbud infrdes (vid tiden fr den srskilda rapporten nr 19/98).
All Member States having reported BSE cases except Luxembourg have now reported cases in animals born after the EU ban of 1994. 
Alla medlemsstater som har rapporterat BSE-fall, utom Luxemburg, har nu rapporterat fall hos djur fdda efter det att EU:s frbud infrdes 1994.
FVO inspections have repeatedly reported on inadequate implementation of the feed ban in all Member States (see Figure 6 and Annex 2). Even in its inspections between 1998 and 2000, up to six years after the ban was first introduced the FVO found that there was a significant risk of contamination of ruminant feed by mammalian MBM in nine Member States (7). 
Vid inspektionerna frn Kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor har man upprepade gnger rapporterat att foderfrbudet inte tillmpas i tillrcklig utstrckning i ngon av medlemsstaterna (se figur 6 och bilaga 2). ven vid inspektionerna mellan 1998 och 2000, upp till sex r efter det att frbudet infrdes fr frsta gngen, upptckte Kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor att det fanns en betydande risk fr att foder till idisslare hade kontaminerats med ktt-och benmjl frn dggdjur i nio medlemsstater (7).
In addition, a certain level of contamination was tolerated by most Member States (except Denmark, Netherlands and Ireland) despite the fact that Community legislation does not allow any such tolerance (8). 
Dessutom tillt de flesta medlemsstater (utom Danmark, Nederlnderna och Irland) en viss grad av kontaminering trots att det inte tillts enligt gemenskapens lagstiftning (8).
The FVO inspections in 1998 to 2000 also found weaknesses in the control of trade in MBM in most Member States (see Figure 6). 
Enligt inspektionerna frn Kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor fanns det ocks brister i kontrollen av handeln med ktt-och benmjl i de flesta medlemsstater (se figur 6).
In December 2000, due to concerns about cross contamination and following the opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee (9), the Council temporarily banned the use of animal proteins in feed for all farmed animals (10). 
I december 2000 frbjd rdet tillflligt anvndningen av animaliskt protein i foder fr djur inom animalieproduktion (9), p grund av oro fr korskontaminering och efter Vetenskapliga styrkommittns yttrande (10).
Following the United Kingdom experience, the Commission was aware of the risk of cross-contamination in feed mills, knowing that SRMs were not being systematically removed in all the Member States, that animal waste used for producing MBM was not safely sourced and that the MBM ban on ruminants only would not be foolproof. Community legislation deals with the minimum standards for feed mills. 
Efter det som intrffade i Frenade kungariket blev kommissionen medveten om risken fr korskontaminering i foderfabriker, eftersom man knde till att specificerat riskmaterial inte systematiskt avlgsnades i alla medlemsstater, att animaliskt avfall som anvndes fr att producera ktt-och benmjl inte kom frn ngon sker klla och att frbudet mot ktt-och benmjl betrffande idisslare inte gick att garantera fullt ut.
However, there is no EU obligation to impose dedicated feed mills, which would have greatly reduced risks of cross-contamination. 
Det fanns emellertid inget EU-krav p att infra srskilda foderfabriker, vilket skulle ha minskat risken fr korskontaminering betydligt.
(1) The United Kingdom banned ruminant derived MBM for cattle in 1988. 
(1) Frenade kungariket infrde 1988 ett frbud mot att utfodra boskap med ktt-och benmjl frn idisslare.
Other Member States introduced their feed bans in: Austria (mammalian protein for ruminants in December 1990); Denmark (ruminant proteins for ruminants in June 1990); Finland (mammalian proteins for ruminants in March 1995); France (mammalian proteins for bovines in July 1990; mammalian proteins for all ruminants in December 1994 and all animal proteins except milk and fish for ruminants in July 1996); Ireland (ruminant protein for ruminants in August 1990); Netherlands (ruminant proteins for ruminants in August 1989); Sweden (ruminant MBM for ruminants in December 1990, and ruminants proteins for all animals in December 1997); Member States that had no feed ban in place until the EU-wide ban on mammalian proteins for ruminants in 1994: Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, Lux-2 embourg and Spain. 
Andra medlemsstater infrde sina foderfrbud vid fljande tidpunkter: sterrike (dggdjurprotein till idisslare i december 1990), Danmark (protein frn idisslare till idisslare i juni 1990), Finland (dggdjursprotein till idisslare i mars 1995), Frankrike (dggdjursprotein till ntkreatur i juli 1990; dggdjursprotein till alla idisslare i december 1994 och allt djurprotein frutom mjlk och fisk till idisslare i juli 1996), Irland (protein frn idisslare till idisslare i augusti 1990), Nederlnderna (protein frn idisslare till idisslare i augusti 1989), Sverige (ktt-och benmjl frn idisslare till idisslare i december 1990 och protein frn idisslare till alla djur i december 1997).
Source: DG VI mission reports in 1996. () Commission Decision 94/381/EC of 27 June 1994 on the ban on use of proteins derived from mammalian tissue for feeding ruminants, as 3 amended, with effect from 4 July 1994 (OJ L 172, 7.7.1994, p. 
Klla: GD VI, granskningsrapporter 1996. 2 ( ) 3 ( ) 4 ( ) 5 ( ) 6 ( ) Kommissionens beslut 94/381/EG av den 27 juni 1994 (EGT L 172, 7.7.1994, s.
23). () The United Kingdom was banned from exporting mammalian MBM produced before 1 January 1995, and was allowed to export MBM produced after that date only if the recommended processing standards had been complied with. 
Frenade kungariket frbjds att exportera ktt-och benmjl frn dggdjur tillverkat fre den 1 januari 1995 och fick endast exportera ktt-och benmjl efter det datumet om de rekommenderade bearbetningsnormerna hade fljts.
7 () Belgium, Germany, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Portu-8 gal (up to July 1999) and Finland. () Source: working document of the Commission services, April 2001, ref. 
7 () Belgien, Tyskland, Spanien, Frankrike, Irland, Italien, Luxemburg, Por-8 tugal (fram till juli 1999) och Finland. () Klla: Arbetsdokument frn kommissionen, april 2001, ref.
SANCO/1531/2001 Rev.1 ÔUse of processed animal proteins in 9 animal feedŐ. () SSC opinion of 27/28 November 2000 on the scientific basis for banning animal protein from the feed for all farmed animals, includ-10 ing pigs, poultry, fish and pet animals. () Council Decision 2000/766/EC of 4 December 2000 concerning certain protection measures with regard to transmissible spongiform encephalopathies and the feeding of animal protein, temporary ban from 1 January to 30 June 2001 (OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p. 32). 
SANCO/ 9 1531/2001 rev.1 ÓUse of Processed Animal Proteins in Animal FeedÓ. () Yttrande frn Vetenskapliga styrkommittn av den 27/28 november 2000 betrffande den vetenskapliga grunden fr att frbjuda animaliskt protein i foder fr alla djur inom animalieproduktion, inklusive grisar, hns, fisk och sllskapsdjur (Opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on the scientific basis for banning animal protein from the feed for all farmed animals, including pig, poultry, fish and pet 10 animals). () Rdets beslut 2000/766/EG av den 4 december 2000 om vissa skyddstgrder vad gller transmissibel spongiform encefalopati och utfodring med animaliskt protein (EGT L 306, 7.12.2000, s. 32), tillflligt frbud frn den 1 januari till den 30 juni 2001.
20.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 324/15 33. 
20.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 324/15 33.
In addition to the failure of Member States to implement the feed ban, there is evidence from the FVO inspections that the agro-feed industry (including renderers and feed mills) did not do enough to avoid contamination of cattle feed by MBM, and that feed containing MBM was not always correctly labelled (in Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Portugal, Finland and Sweden). 
Frutom att medlemsstaterna har misslyckats med att genomfra foderfrbudet, visar inspektionerna frn Kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor att foderindustrin (inbegripet konverteringsanlggningar och foderfabriker) inte gjort tillrckligt fr att undvika att boskapsfoder blandades med ktt-och benmjl och att foder som innehll ktt-och benmjl inte alltid mrkts korrekt (i Tyskland, Grekland, Spanien, Frankrike, Italien, sterrike, Portugal, Finland och Sverige).
These failures contributed to farmers inadvertently using potentially infective feed for their cattle. 
Dessa frsummelser bidrog till att jordbrukare av misstag anvnde foder som eventuellt var smittat till sina djur.
The temporary ban on the use of MBM for all farm animals, the purchase for destruction scheme and prohibition of the use of certain animal tissues (SRMs) will create animal waste that has to be disposed of safely and without a negative impact on the environment. 
Det tillflliga frbudet mot att anvnda ktt-och benmjl fr alla djur inom animalieproduktion, uppkpsordningen fr destruering och frbudet mot anvndning av vissa djurvvnader (speci-ficerat riskmaterial) kommer att ge upphov till animaliskt avfall som mste tas om hand p ett skert stt utan att det fr negativa konsekvenser fr miljn.
Before the current feed ban (1), an estimated 16 million tonnes of animal waste was recycled for animal feed every year in the EU. 
Fre det nuvarande foderfrbudet (1) tervanns inom EU uppskattningsvis 16 miljoner ton animaliskt avfall till djurfoder per r.
In the short to medium term, the Commission considers the most common way of disposing of this waste will be to convert it into MBM for incineration or landfill, with unavoidable environmental consequences (2). 
P kort till medellng sikt anser kommissionen att det vanligaste sttet att bortskaffa detta avfall kommer att vara att omvandla det till ktt-och benmjl fr frbrnning eller deponering, vilket oundvikligen fr konsekvenser fr miljn (2).
However, the incineration capacity required for this is not immediately available in the EU. 
Den frbrnningskapacitet som behvs fr detta finns fr nrvarande inte i EU.
The cost of such disposal is estimated to be 3 000 million euro, and another 1 300 million euro will be lost in revenue (from the waste) to producers and the rendering industry (3). 
Kostnaden fr sdant bortskaffande berknas uppg till 3 000 miljoner euro. Drtill kommer ytterligare 1 300 miljoner euro i form av kompensation (fr avfallet) till producenterna och konverteringsindustrin (3).
The temporary ban on using MBM in feed for farmed animals, creates a need to find plant-based alternatives to processed animal protein for use in animal feed. 
Det tillflliga frbudet mot att anvnda ktt-och benmjl till djur inom animalieproduktion skapar ett behov av att finna vxtbaserade alternativ till bearbetat animaliskt protein i djurfoder.
Animal derived proteins Ń mostly MBM Ń provided only 2,4 % of the protein element in animal feed in the EU (4) (and if there is even minimal contamination by infected MBM, then BSE can be spread (see paragraph 6)) and can be readily substituted by forage crops, cereals, and oilseed products. 
Animaliska protein Đ mestadels ktt-och benmjl Đ utgjorde bara 2,4 % av proteinet i djurfoder inom EU (4) (BSE kan spridas ven om det bara finns en obetydlig kontaminering av infekterat ktt-ochbenmjlĐsepunkt6)ochdekanlttersttasmedfodervx- ter, spannml och produkter frn oljevxter.
The issue of whether it is appropriate to feed animals which are naturally herbivores with feed which includes animal parts has become more topical, and the CommissionŐs recent proposals include measures to encourage more extensive farming. 
Frgan om det r lmpligt att utfodra djur som r naturliga vxttare med foder som innehller djurdelar har blivit mer aktuell och kommissionens nya frslag innehller tgrder fr att uppmuntra extensiva jordbruksmetoder.
Animal movement and identification 36. 
Frflyttning och identifiering av djur 36.
The transport of animals and meat products (including MBM) within and between the Member States is significant. 
Transporten av djur och kttprodukter (dribland ktt-och benmjl) inom och mellan medlemsstaterna r betydande.
One of the side effects, however, is that the risk of spreading BSE and other animal diseases is increased by trade. 
En av sidoeffekterna r emellertid att risken fr att sprida BSE och andra djursjukdomar kar genom handelsutbytet.
According to the SSC, Ôthe export of infected animals and infected feed (from the United Kingdom) provided the means for the spread of the BSE agent to other countries, where it was again recycled and propagated via the feed chainŐ (5). 
Enligt Vetenskapliga styrkommittn utgjorde exporten av smittade djur och smittat foder (frn Frenade kungariket) orsaken till att BSE-smittmnet spred sig till andra lnder, dr det tervanns p nytt och spreds via foderkedjan (5).
The 1996 BSE crisis reinforced the need for an efficient system for bovine identification and registration, and highlighted the deficiencies of the current systems for tracing cattle potentially at risk of BSE. 
Genom 1996 rs BSE-kris frstrktes behovet av ett effektivt system fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur, och bristerna i de nuvarande systemen fr att spra boskap som eventuellt befann sig riskzonen fr BSE uppmrksammades.
In April 1997, the Council replaced the existing 1992 Directive on animal identification and registration with a new Council Regulation (6), which adapted the rules for eartagging (7) and herd registers, and introduced requirements for a computerised database (8) and animal passports. 
I april 1997 ersatte rdet det befintliga direktivet frn 1992 om identifiering och registrering av djur med en ny frordning (6), som anpassade bestmmelserna fr ronmrkning (7) och register ver djurbesttningarna, samt infrde krav p en databas (8) och djurpass.
Detailed rules for inspections to verify compliance with these measures were introduced in December 1997 (9). 
I december 1997 infrdes nrmare freskrifter fr inspektioner i syfte att kontrollera efterlevnaden av dessa tgrder (9).
The total export ban of March 1996 on live animals and bovine meat or meat products from the United Kingdom was lifted gradually to allow exports of beef produced under restricted 1 () Source: Commission proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption COM(2000) 574 2 final of 19 October 2000. () Source: Commission working document SEC(2001) 631 of 10 April 2001. 
Totalfrbudet frn mars 1996 mot export av levande djur samt ktt eller kttprodukter frn ntkreatur frn Frenade kungariket hvdes gradvis fr ntktt som producerats under vissa 1 ( ) 2 ( ) Klla: Arbetsdokument frn kommissionen SEK(2001) 631 av den 10 april 2001. Dessutom vervgde man i rapporten frn den internationella vetenskapskonferensens frsta mte om ktt-och benmjl fljande alternativ fr bortskaffande av avfall om ktt-och benmjl skulle frbjudas som djurfoder: genom anvndning som gdningsmedel, genom frbrnning eller genom deponering.
In addition, the report of the first session of the International Scientific Conference on meat and bonemeal organised under the aegis of the Scientific Steering Committee of the EU, Brussels 1 and 2 July 1997, considered the following options for waste disposal if MBM was banned as animal feed Ń by application to land as fertil-3 ised, by incineration or by landfill. () Source: Commission note on economic impact of a total ban on an-4 imal meal (undated). () Source: document de travail des services de la Commission ÔOffre et demande de plantes riches en proteins dans lŐUE  la suite de la crise de lŐESBŐ SEC(2001) 431 of 16 March 2001. 
Konferensen anordnades av EU:s vetenskapliga styrkommitt i Bryssel den 1 och 3 2 juli 1997. () Klla: En not frn kommissionen om de ekonomiska konsekvenserna 4 av ett totalfrbud mot animaliskt mjl (odaterad). ( ) Klla: Arbetsdokument frn kommissionen ÓOffre et demande de plantes riches en proteins dans lŐUE  la suite de la crise de lŐESBÓ SEK(2001) 431 av den 16 mars 2001.
(5) 6 () 7 ( ) 8 () 9 () Chapter 2.2 final opinion of 6 July 2000 of the Scientific Steering Committee on the geographical risk of BSE. Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 (OJ L 117, 7.5.1997, p. 1). 
(5) Kapitel 2.2, Vetenskapliga styrkommittns slutliga yttrande om geografisk riskbedmning av BSE (Final Opinion of the Scientific Steering Committee on the Geographical Risk of Bovine Spongiform Ence-6 phalopathy (GBR)), av den 6 juli 2000. () Rdets frordning (EG) nr 820/97 (EGT L 117, 7.5.1997, s. 1).
This Regulation deals with the provisions directly applicable to the integrated administration and control system as well as labelling of beef and beef products. Eartags are to be applied to each ear to identify all animals on the holding born after 1 January 1998 or intended for intra-Community trade after that date. 
Denna frordning innehller bestmmelser som r direkt tillmpliga svl fr det integrerade administrations-och kontrollsystemet som fr mrk-7 ning av ntktt och ntkttsprodukter. () Ett ronmrke skall sttas fast p vardera rat fr att kunna identifiera alla djur p anlggningen som r fdda efter den 1 januari 1998 eller 8 som r avsedda fr handel inom gemenskapen efter detta datum. () Databasen skulle vara fullt fungerande senast den 31 december 1999.
Once the database is operational, holdings must report to the competent authority all movements, births and deaths of animals. 
Nr databasen vl fungerar mste alla djurhllare rapportera alla frflyttningar av djur samt alla djur som fds och dr till den behriga myndigheten.
Council Directive 97/12/EC (OJ L 109, 25.4.1997, p. 
Rdets direktiv 97/12/EG (EGT L 109, 25.4.1997, s.
1) concerns veterinary measures for intra-Community trade, but also specifies the requirements for the computerised database as stipulated by Council Regulation (EC) No 820/97 (OJ L 117, 7.5.1997 p. 
1) rr veterinra tgrder fr handel inom gemenskapen, men faststller ocks kraven fr den databas som freskrivs i rdets frordning (EG) nr 820/97 (EGT L 117, 7.5.1997 s.
1). Article 14 of the Directive refers to the information which should be available in the computer system: the identification code, date of birth, sex, breed or colour of coat, ID code of the mother cow (dam), the ID number of the holdings where born, ID numbers of all holdings where the animal has been kept, the dates of each change of holding, date of death or slaughter. 
1). Artikel 14 i direktivet hnvisar till den information som br finnas tillgnglig i datasystemet, nmligen identifikationskod, fdelsedatum, kn, ras eller frg, moderns identifikationskod, fdelseanlggningens identifikationsnummer, identifikationsnummer fr alla anlggningar dr djuret har hllits och datum fr djurets frflyttning, dds-eller slaktdatum.
If these requirements are respected the database could provide complete documentation on each bovine animal. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2630/97 (OJ L 354, 30.12.1997, p. 
Om dessa krav efterlevs kan man genom databasen f en fullstndig dokumentation 9 om varje ntkreatur. () Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 2630/97 (EGT L 354, 30.12.1997, s.
The risk analysis must take into account the number of animals on the holdings; public and animal health considerations and any previous existence or outbreak of disease, the amount of bovine premium claimed/paid in comparison to previous years, other significant changes and the results of checks conducted in earlier years (e.g. the proper keeping of holding register and passports). C 324/16 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 20.11.2001 conditions (1). 
Riskanalysen mste ta hnsyn till antalet djur p anlggningen, djur-och folkhlsovillkor och all tidigare frekomst eller utbrott av sjukdomar, beloppet fr det rliga ntkreatursbidrag som fretaget anskt om/beviljats jmfrt med det belopp som betalats ut tidigare r, andra betydande frndringar och resultatet av kontroller som utfrts tidigare r (t.ex. att registret fr jordbruksfretaget frts p ett korrekt stt och att det finns korrekta pass).
The ban in Northern Ireland was lifted as of 1 June 1998 and for mainland Britain from 1 August 1999. 
Frbudet i Nordirland hvdes frn den 1 juni 1998 och frbudet fr Storbritannien frn den 1 augusti 1999.
The Standing Veterinary Committee decided in March 2001 that the export ban of November 1998 on Portugal (2) could be lifted, but that the date would depend on a positive inspection report by the FVO. 
Stndiga veterinrkommittn beslutade i mars 2001 att export-frbudet frn november 1998 rrande Portugal (2) kunde upphvas, men att datumet var beroende av att inspektionsrapporten frn Kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor var positiv.
The CourtŐs Special Report No 4/2001 (3) on the integrated administration and control system found that although the deadline for implementation of the computerised database was 1 January 2000, eight Member States had databases which had not been approved by the Commission services as fully operational (4); and that there were weaknesses in the approval, monitoring, and content of bovine identification and registration databases. 
Av revisionsrttens srskilda rapport nr 4/2001 (3) om det integrerade administrations-och kontrollsystemet framgick att tta medlemsstater hade databaser som inte blivit godknda av kommissionen som fullt fungerande (4) trots att tidsfristen fr upprttandet av databasen var den 1 januari 2000 samt att det frekom brister i godknnandet, vervakningen och innehllet i databaserna fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur.