natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Source: Commission (16) Commission Decisions 2001/646/EC (OJ L 228, 24.8.2001, P. 24), 2001/652/EC (OJ L 230, 28.8.2001, p.8), 2001/653/EC (OJ L 230, 28.8.2001, p. 
Klla: Kommissionen. (16) Kommissionens beslut 2001/646/EG (EGT L 228, 24.8.2001, s.
12) and 2001/654/EC (OJ L 230, 28.8.2001, p. 
12) och 2001/654/EG (EGT L 230, 28.8.2001, s.
16) concerning a financial contribution towards the eradication of foot-and-mouth disease in France, Ireland, Netherlands and United Kingdom. 
16) om ekonomiskt std till utrotning av mul-och klvsjuka i Frankrike, Irland, Nederlnderna och Frenade kungariket.
(17) Payments made as of 31 December 2003. 
(17) Gjorda utbetalningar per den 31 december 2003.
C 54/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union Diagram 2 Use of Emergency Veterinary Fund budget for years 2001, 2002 and 2003 3.3.2005 (1) FMD 2001: foot-and-mouth disease in year 2001. 
C 54/8 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning Diagram 2 Anvndning av budgeten fr Fonden fr ndfallstgrder p veterinromrdet fr budgetren 2001, 2002 och 2003 3.3.2005 (1) MK 2001: Mul-och klvsjuka r 2001.
(2) Commitments for ÔOther animal diseasesŐ: 114,38 million euro. 
(2) taganden fr Óvriga djursjukdomarÓ: 114,38 miljoner euro.
(3) Payments for ÔOther animal diseasesŐ: 36,2 million euro. 
(3) Betalningar fr Óvriga djursjukdomarÓ: 36,2 miljoner euro.
NB: Payment appropriations do not include carryovers of appropriations of around 17 million euro from year 2000. 
Anm.: I betalningstagandena ingr inte verfringen av omkring 17 miljoner euro frn budgetret 2000.
Around 2,5 million euro has been included under the heading ÔOther diseasesŐfor FMD expenditure for year 2000 in Greece. 
Utgifterna fr mul-och klvsjuka r 2000 i Grekland, omkring 2,5 miljoner euro, har lagts till under rubriken Ó vriga djursjukdomarÓ.
The CourtŐs audit 12. 
Revisionsrttens granskning 12.
Following the classical swine fever and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) crises, the Court examined the Community measures to control these animal diseases (18). 
Efter kriserna med svinpest och bovin spongiform encefalopati underskte revisionsrtten gemenskapens tgrder fr att bekmpa dessa djursjukdomar (18).
In view of the scale of the FMD crisis and the cost to the budget the Court decided to carry out a new audit with the objective of establishing whether: (a) the analytical method followed by the Commission in determining the strategy for preventing and controlling FMD was sufficiently up-to-date; (b) the Commission, on the basis of its checks and appraisals, had presented adaptations to the Community strategy to the Council; (18) Annual Report concerning the financial year 1995 (OJ C 340, 12.11.1996, p. 1). 
Infr omfattningen av mul-och klvsjukekrisen och dess belastning p budgeten beslutade revisionsrtten att genomfra en ny granskning fr att faststlla huruvida a) kommissionens analysprocess som ledde till faststllandet av strategin fr att frebygga och bekmpa mul-och klvsjuka var tillrckligt uppdaterad, b) kommissionen, mot bakgrund av sina kontroller och utvrderingar, infr rdet hade lagt fram frslag p anpassningar av gemenskapsstrategin, (18) rsrapport fr budgetret 1995 (EGT C 340, 12.11.1996, s.
Special Report No 19/98 concerning the Community financing of certain measures taken as a result of the BSE crisis (OJ C 383, 9.12.1998, p. 1). 
1). Srskild rapport nr 19/98 om gemenskapsfinansiering av vissa tgrder som vidtagits p grund av BSE-krisen (EGT C 383, 9.12.1998, s.
Special Report No 1/2000 on classical swine fever (OJ C 85, 23.3.2000, p. 
Srskild rapport nr 1/2000 om klassisk svinpest (EGT C 85, 23.3.2000, s.
Special Report No 14/2001. Follow-up to Special Report No 19/98 on BSE (OJ C 324, 20.11.2001, p. 
Srskild rapport nr 14/2001 om uppfljning av srskild rapport nr 19/98 om BSE (EGT C 324, 20.11.2001, s.
1). the system introduced by the Commission for reimbursing Member StatesŐ expenditure was adequate, rapid and non-discriminatory. (c) 14. 
1). c) systemet fr ersttning av medlemsstaternas utgifter, som infrts av kommissionen, var adekvat, snabbt och icke-diskriminerande. 14.
In as far as some of the lessons learned from previous epidemics might be relevant to the strategy for preventing and controlling FMD, the Court first examined the CommissionŐs action before and during the crisis. 
Eftersom vissa erfarenheter frn tidigare epizootiska sjukdomar kunde komma till nytta fr strategin fr att frhindra och bekmpa mul-och klvsjuka, underskte revisionsrtten frst kommissionens insatser fre och under krisen.
It then studied the reimbursement system, especially in the light of its previous recommendations. 
Drefter analyserades ersttningssystemet, srskilt mot bakgrund av revisionsrttens tidigare rekommendationer.
This examination was confined to the expenditure on compensation for the slaughter of animals (19). 
Underskningen begrnsades till utgifter fr ersttning fr djurslakt (19).
Lastly, the Court undertook a review of the lessons learned by the Commission after the 2001 crisis. 
Slutligen har revisionsrtten gtt igenom vilka erfarenheter kommissionen har dragit av krisen 2001.
(19) As long as the Commission has not completed its negotiations with the Member States and adopted a final decision on the reimbursement to be granted, the Court will not be able to give an opinion either on other FMD expenditure in connection with the disposal of carcases and the disinfecting of premises and equipment or on the CommissionŐs financial controls. 
(19) Innan kommissionen har avslutat frhandlingarna med medlemsstaterna och antagit ett slutgiltigt beslut rrande vilken ersttning som skall beviljas, kan revisionsrtten inte yttra sig om andra utgifter fr mul-och klvsjuka som hr samman med destruering av djur, desinficering av anlggningar och materiel eller om kommissionens ekonomiska kontroller.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/9 15. 
3.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 54/9 15.
The audit work was carried out at the Commission and in Member States affected by FMD (France, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) (20). 
Granskningsarbetet genomfrdes vid kommissionen och i de medlemsstater (20) som hade drabbats av mul-och klvsjuka (Frankrike, Irland, Nederlnderna och Frenade kungariket).
The audit visits were mainly to the agriculture ministries responsible for the health and veterinary aspects and their regional offices (21). 
Granskningarna gllde huvudsakligen jordbruksministerier med ansvar fr veterinrfrgor och hygienfrgor, samt deras decentraliserade regionala enheter (21).
Account has been taken in this report of work by the authorities visited and by the European Parliament and the International Conference on Control and Prevention of Foot-and-Mouth Disease and other public inquiries carried out in the Member States (22). 
I denna rapport har det tagits hnsyn (22) till arbete som utfrts vid de beskta instanserna, av Europaparlamentet, av den internationella konferensen om frebyggande och bekmpning av mul-och klvsjuka samt andra offentliga underskningar som gjorts i medlemsstaterna.
COMMISSION ACTION BEFORE THE CRISIS Analytical method not sufficiently up-to-date 16. 
KOMMISSIONENS INSATSER F RE KRISEN Analysprocessen var inte tillrckligt uppdaterad 16.
In the 1989 report (23) mentioned above (see paragraph 2), the Commission carried out a cost-benefit analysis of the various policies followed by the Member States in controlling FMD (policy of preventive vaccination, or policy of systematic slaughter), with a view to defining the strategy to be followed at Community level. 
I sin rapport 1989 (23), som redan nmnts (se punkt 2), gjorde kommissionen en kostnads-intktsanalys av de olika strategier medlemsstaterna valt fr att bekmpa mul-och klvsjuka (frebyggande vaccinering eller systematisk slakt) i syfte att faststlla en strategi p gemenskapsniv.
In particular, it assessed the risk of FMD occurring in the Community if one or other of the two policies were to be applied from 1992 onwards, together with the economic effects (20) Three of the audit visits were carried out jointly with Commission staff. 
Srskilt utvrderades riskerna fr utbrott av mul-och klvsjuka i gemenskapen beroende (20) Tre av granskningsbesken genomfrdes tillsammans med kommissionens avdelningar.
(21) Beneficiaries and valuers who had established the value of the slaughtered animals were also interviewed. 
(21) Samtidigt frdes samtal med stdmottagarare och med vrderingsmn som hade faststllt vrdet p slaktade djur.
The Office international des epizooties (OIE) in Paris, Pirbright Laboratory and the National Audit Office (NAO) in London were also visited. 
Besk gjordes ven vid Internationella byrn fr epizootiska sjukdomar i Paris, Pirbright-laboratoriet och National Audit Office i London, det nationella revisionsorganet i Frenade kungariket.
(22) International Conference on Control and Prevention of Foot-and-mouth disease, Final Report, organised by the Belgian EU Presidency, European Commission, Netherlands and United Kingdom, Brussels, 12-13 December 2001; The 2001 Outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, 21 June 2002, The Stationery Office, London; Rapport dŐinformation nĄ 405 by J-P morine of the French Senate, adopted at the Senate meeting of 21 June 2001; Foot-and-mouth disease 2001: Lessons to be Learned, Inquiry Report by Dr Iain Anderson CBE, July 2002, The Stationery Office, London; Infectious diseases in livestock, The Royal Society, July 2002; Response to the Reports of the Foot-and-mouth disease Inquiries, HM Government with the Welsh Assembly Government, November 2002; European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2002 on measures to control foot-and-mouth disease in the European Union in 2001 and future measures to prevent and control animal diseases in the European Union, and Report of the Temporary Committee on foot-and-mouth disease, European Parliament, document No A5-0405/2002. 
(22) International Conference on Control and Prevention of Foot and Mouth Disease, Final Report, Bryssel, 12 och 13 december 2001, internationell konferens om kontroll och frebyggande av mul-och klvsjuka som anordnades av rdets belgiska ordfrandeskap, Europeiska kommissionen, Nederlnderna och Frenade kungariket; The 2001 Outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, rapport av controllern och riksrevisorn om 2001 rs utbrott av mul-och klvsjuka, 21 juni 2002, The Stationery Office, London; Rapport dŐinformation nĄ 405, informationsrapport av J-P morine, ledamot av franska senaten, antagen vid dess sammantrde den 21 juni 2001; Foot and Mouth Disease 2001: Lessons to be learned Inquiry, rapport om erfarenheterna av mul-och klvsjuka, 22 juli 2002, Dr Iain Anderson CBE, The Stationery Office, London; Infectious diseases in livestock, smittsamma sjukdomar hos djur, The Royal Society, juli 2002; Svar p rapporterna ÓFoot and Mouth Disease InquiriesÓ (underskningar om mul-och klvsjuka), HM Government with the Welsh Assembly Government, brittiska regeringen tillsammans med Wales parlament, november 2002.
(23) Report from the Commission to the Council on a study carried out by the Commission on policies currently applied by Member States in the control of foot-and-mouth disease, Commission of the European Communities, SEC (89) 1731 final, 18 October 1989. of the two possible alternatives. 
(23) Rapport de la Commission au Conseil relatif  une tude effectu par la Commission sur les politiques actuelles des tats membres dans le domaine de la lutte contre la fivre aphteuse (rapport frn kommissionen till rdet om en studie som utfrts av kommissionen om medlemsstaternas nuvarande politik fr att bekmpa mul-och klvsjuka), Europeiska kommissionen, SEK(89) 1731 slutlig av den 18 oktober 1989. p om den ena eller den andra strategin skulle komma att tillmpas efter 1992, liksom de ekonomiska konsekvenserna av de tv olika alternativen.
The Commission projected the costs over a period of 10 years (from 1993 to 2002) according to three different scenarios for the scale of the crises. 
Kommissionens prognos strckte sig ver tio r (frn 1993 till och med 2002) med kostnader vid tre olika scenarier i frga om krisens omfattning.
For the non-vaccination policy it used an intermediate scenario with 13 epidemics of 20 outbreaks. 
Fr politiken med icke-vaccinering tnkte man sig ett mellanscenario med 13 epizootiska sjukdomar och 20 utbrott.
The estimated cost over the same period was 35 million euro. 
Den berknade kostnaden fr samma period var 35 miljoner euro.
The estimate for the cost of the optimistic scenario, on the other hand, was 0,3 million euro, and that for the worst scenario was 955 million euro. 
Fr det optimistiska scenariot berknades dremot kostnaden till 0,3 miljoner euro och fr det pessimistiska scenariot till 955 miljoner euro.
Moreover, the main emphasis of the 1989 report was on commercial considerations and consideration of budgetary and agricultural costs and profits, without taking into account the wider social and environmental costs. 
I rapporten frn 1988 betonades emellertid framfr allt handelsmssiga aspekter, kostnader och vinster fr jordbruket och fr budgeten, utan att det togs hnsyn till mer vidstrckta sociala kostnader och kostnader fr miljn.
Because of the nature of the animal disease epidemics that occurred in the Union before 2001, the Commission was unaware of the need to check whether the Community arrangements were viable. 
Fre 2001 hade de epizootiska sjukdomar som upptrtt inom gemenskapen inte varit av den typen att kommissionen uppmrksammats p behovet av att kontrollera att gemenskapens bestmmelser fungerade.
There had, in fact, been three epidemics that involved more than 20 outbreaks (the maximum possible in the scenario used by the Commission), but on the other hand, there had only been four crises in eight years (compared with thirteen in ten years according to the same scenario). 
Det var i sjlva verket s att  ena sidan hade tre epizootiska sjukdomar givit upphov till ver tjugo utbrott (det hgsta vrdet i kommissionens scenario) men  andra sidan hade det inte frekommit mer n fyra kriser p tta r (jmfrt med tretton p tio r i samma scenario).
On the other hand, a number of risks conducive to the spread of the virus had increased since 1993: the number of livestock movements had increased (24) with the completion of the single market, the number of abattoirs had fallen (25), leading to increased concentrations of animals and an enhanced risk of infection, while stocking densities, particularly of sheep, goats and pigs, had soared (26). 
Sedan 1993 hade dremot vissa riskfaktorer som frmjade virusets spridning kat: antalet djurfrflyttningar hade kat (24) i och med frverkligandet av den inre marknaden; antalet slakterier hade minskat (25) vilket ledde till att djur samlades ihop med tfljande smittorisk; samtidigt hade ttheten i besttningarna kat, srskilt i frga om fr, getter och svin(26).
In February 1998 the FAO (27) drew the attention of the 33 Member States of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease to the fact that, at any time, ÔEurope may face further devastating animal disease epidemics due to long-distance transport of animals and increasingly dense livestock unitsŐ (28). 
I februari 1998 uppmrksammade FAO (27) de 33 medlemsstaterna i Kommissionen fr bekmpning av mul-och klvsjuka p att djurtransporter ver lnga strckor liksom den allt hgre ttheten i djurpopulationerna nr som helst kunde ge upphov till nya frdande utbrott av epizootiska sjukdomar i Europa (28).
(24) In the case of cattle, there are movements involving around three million head per year. 
(24) I frga om ntboskap uppgr rrelserna till tre miljoner djur per r.
(25) The number of abattoirs in the United Kingdom fell from 1 400 in 1990 to 400 in 1999. 
(25) Antalet slakterier i Frenade kungariket hade minskat frn 1 400 stycken 1990 till 400 stycken 1999.
(26) Between 1987 and 1997 the density of pigs per farm had more than tripled in Ireland, and increased by more than 50 % in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and France. The density of sheep per holding had also increased substantially in Spain, Ireland and the United Kingdom in particular, where it reached almost 500 head per holding, four times higher than the average density for the Union (137,9 head per holding). 
(26) Mellan 1987 och 1997 kade ttheten i svinbesttningar per jordbruksfretag mer n tre gnger i Irland, och med ver 50 % i Nederlnderna, Frenade kungariket och Frankrike. ven i frga om fr kade djurttheten per jordbruksfretag betydligt i Spanien, Irland och srskilt i Frenade kungariket dr den ndde upp till nstan 500 djur per jordbruksfretag, vilket r mer n fyra gnger mer n genomsnittet i gemenskapen (137,9 djur per jordbruksfretag).
The stocking density for goats increased likewise over the period, especially in Greece, Spain, France, Italy and the Netherlands. 
Likas kade djurttheten fr getter per jordbruksfretag under perioden, srskilt i Grekland, Spanien, Frankrike, Italien och Nederlnderna.
(Structure of agricultural holdings Historic results Ń Surveys from 1966/1967 to 1997 Ń Final version: October 2000 Eurostat, p. 
(Jordbruksfretagens struktur, historiska resultat-underskningar frn 1966/1967 till 1997. Slutlig version: oktober 2000 Eurostat, s.
88, 89 and 92). 
88, 89 och 92.)
(27) United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation. 
(27) FN:s fackorgan fr livsmedels-och jordbruksfrgor (Food and Agriculture Organization).
(28) FAO press release 98/05. 
(28) Pressmeddelande frn FAO 98/05.
C 54/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 19. 
C 54/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 3.3.2005 19.
Moreover, the swine fever epidemic in 1997/1998 had generated significant costs for the Community (29), Member States and producers. 
Vidare hade svinpestepidemin 1997/1998 lett till stora utgifter fr gemenskapen (29), medlemsstaterna och uppfdarna.
In the light of that experience, the Commission itself judged the anti-FMD measures provided for in Directive 85/511/EEC incomplete (30). 
Mot bakgrund av denna erfarenhet var det kommissionens egen bedmning (30) att de tnkta tgrderna mot mul-och klvsjuka i direktiv 85/511/EEG var ofullstndiga.
Based on expert opinion the Commission then began to revise the Directive, but its work was interrupted when the disease broke out in the United Kingdom on 20 February 2001. 
Kommissionens avdelningar hade ocks pbrjat en versyn av direktivet p grundval av expertutltanden nr utbrottet av den epizootiska sjukdomen i Frenade kungariket den 20 februari 2001 avbrt deras arbete.
The strategy has not been fully evaluated by the Commission since its adoption in 1990. 
Kommissionen har inte gjort ngon fullstndig utvrdering av strategin sedan den antogs 1990.
Furthermore, the Commission has not submitted a report to the Council and the Parliament every three years on the conditions of application of Decision 90/424/EEC concerning Community eradication measures and the financial aid granted for that purpose (31). 
Kommissionen har inte heller vart tredje r rapporterat till rdet och Europaparlamentet om omstndigheterna vid tillmpningen av beslut 90/424/EEG om gemenskapens utrotningstgrder och det ekonomiska stdet till dessa (31).
Neither has it updated the study of Member StatesŐ veterinary services carried out by the Directorate-General for Agriculture in 1992, even though the updated study would have enabled it to check whether they were in an adequate state to ensure that the strategy succeeded (see paragraphs 48 to 49) Commission supervision was insufficient in some respects and deficiencies in the regulations were not remedied in time 21. 
Kommissionen har inte heller uppdaterat den studie som 1992 utfrdes av Generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk om medlemsstaternas veterinrvsenden, fastn en uppdatering av denna studie hade gjort det mjligt att kontrollera om dessa rckte till fr att garantera att strategin var framgngsrik (se punkterna 48 och 49). Kommissionens vervakning var otillrcklig i vissa avseenden och det fanns brister i regelverket som inte tgrdades i tid 21.
In normal times Commission supervision of health and veterinary aspects essentially takes two forms: firstly, its staff in Brussels verify that directives have been incorporated into national law, and secondly, inspectors from the Health and Veterinary Office (HVO) in Dublin (32) carry out on-site inspections. 
Under normala frhllanden sker kommissionens vervakning av veterinr-och hygienomrdena framfr allt p tv stt: dels kontrollerar avdelningarna i Bryssel att direktiv infrlivas i den nationella lagstiftningen, dels utfrs kontroller p plats av inspektrer frn kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor (OAV) i Dublin (32).
In the period preceding the 2001 crisis the inspections required by the regulations should have focused, in the CourtŐs opinion, on the essential measures for preventing and controlling FMD that are defined in Community directives and with the transposition of them into the national law of the Member States. 
Revisionsrtten anser att under perioden som fregick krisen 2001 borde dessa reglementsenliga kontroller ha inriktats p de grundlggande tgrderna fr att frebygga och bekmpa mul-och klvsjuka som faststllts i gemenskapsdirektiven och p infrlivandet av dem i medlemsstaternas nationella lagstiftning.
Those measures include: (a) veterinary and health checks at frontiers in the case of imports of animals and animal products; (b) checks on animal feed in order to avoid contamination of animals or animal products; (29) A total of 650,5 million euro was charged to the Community budget for 1997 and 1998. 
Bland dessa tgrder ingr a) veterinr-och hygienkontroller vid grnserna vid import av djur och animaliska produkter, b) kontroller av djurfoder fr att undvika att djur eller animaliska produkter smittas, (29) Sammanlagt togs 650,5 miljoner euro upp i gemenskapsbudgeten fr 1997 och 1998.
Court Special Report No 1/2000, paragraph 1. 
Revisionsrttens srskilda rapport nr 1/2000, punkt 1.
(30) COM (2002) 736 final of 13 December 2002, p. 
(30) KOM(2002) 736 slutlig av den 13 december 2002, s.
(31) Article 43a of Decision 90/424/EEC requires the Commission to submit a report on the conditions of its application to the Parliament and the Council every three years. 
(31) I artikel 43a i beslut 90/424/EEG anges att kommissionen vart tredje r skall verlmna en rapport om villlkoren fr tillmpning av beslutet till Europaparlamentet och rdet.
(32) Directorate F of the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection. (c) drawing-up of contingency plans by the Member States to ensure that human resources, equipment and adequate organisation can be drawn upon, should a crisis arise; (d) the drawing-up by Member States of systems for identifying and tracking animal movements and a system of messages between Member States (ANIMO), all of which are essential for tracing and slaughtering contaminated animals quickly. 
(32) Direktion F inom Generaldirektoratet fr hlsa och konsumentskydd. c) infrande av beredskapsplaner i medlemsstaterna fr att kunna mobilisera mnskliga resurser, materiel och en lmplig organisation nr en kris bryter ut, d) att medlemsstaterna infr system fr att identifiera och spra djurfrflyttningar, samt ett system fr informationsutbyte mellan medlemsstaterna (Animo) vilket r vsentligt fr att spra upp och snabbt slakta smittade djur.
Transposition of Community directives into national law not systematically verified for compliance 22. 
Ingen systematisk kontroll av att infrlivandet av gemenskapsdirektiv i nationell lagstiftning var korrekt 22.
The Commission verifies quasi systematically the formal transposition of legislation by Member States within the time allowed by Community directives. 
Kommissionen kontrollerar s gott som systematiskt att medlemsstaterna formellt infrlivar gemenskapsdirektiven inom givna tidsfrister.
Compliance tests, on the other hand, are not operated systematically. 
Dremot kontrolleras inte verensstmmelsen systematiskt.