natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
According to the statistics provided by the Member States for 2012-2013, the Court concludes that: я the coverage of the installations falling under the latter directive was compliant with the requirements; я for direct discharge by installations not falling under the scope of the industrial emissions directive the situation on the actual frequency of the public inspections is very similar to the one presented in Table 6: the frequency was lowest in Slovakia and for Hungary no data was received allowing an assessment of the frequency of inspections; я for indirect discharge, public inspection bodies carry out few checks at the industrial installations concerned as it is primarily the responsibility of the operator of the urban waste water treatment plant to ensure the respect of the emission limits set by contract. 
P grundval av medlemsstaternas statistik fr perioden 2012Đ2013 konstaterar revisionsrtten att Ń kontrollernas omfattning nr det gller de anlggningar som omfattas av direktivet om industriutslpp uppfyllde kraven, Ń nr det gller direkta utslpp frn anlggningar som inte omfattas av direktivet om industriutslpp r situationen i frga om den offentliga tillsynens frekvens mycket lik den som beskrivs i tabell 6: den var lgst i Slovakien, och frn Ungern fick vi inga uppgifter som gr att vi kan bedma den, Ń nr det gller indirekta utslpp gr offentliga tillsynsorgan f kontroller vid de berrda industrianlggningarna eftersom ansvaret fr att se till att de utslppsgrnsvrden som faststllts i kontrakt respekteras frmst vilar p operatren av anlggningen fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse.
The Court found that for 22 out of 26 urban waste water treatment plants analysed (85 %) the operators carried out on-the-spot checks60. 
Vid 22 av de 26 anlggningar som vi analyserade (85 %) gjorde operatrerna kontroller p plats60.
For three of the remaining four plants, the operators relied on the results of the industrial dischargersу self-checks. 
Vid tre av de fyra terstende anlggningarna frlitade sig operatrerna p resultaten av de egenkontroller som utfrts av de industrier som stod fr utslppen.
59 For self-checks in case of indirect discharge, see Special Report No 2/2015, paragraph 60. 
59 Se punkt 60 i srskild rapport nr 2/2015 nr det gller egenkontroller vid indirekta utslpp.
60 The operators of the sewage networks/urban waste water treatment plants that receive the waste water are obliged by law in the Czech Republic, Romania and Slovakia to carry out on-the-spot checks. 
60 Operatrerna av de avloppsnt eller anlggningar fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse som tar emot avloppsvattnet r skyldiga enligt lag att gra kontroller p plats i Tjeckien, Rumnien och Slovakien.
Observations 37 96 One measure in the 2009 river basin management plan of Slovakia was to tighten the inspection system. 
Iakttagelser 37 96 En tgrd i Slovakiens frvaltningsplan fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009 var att skrpa tillsynssystemet.
However, there was no indication on how and when this measure would be implemented and lack of funding for implementing the system was mentioned as the main problem. 
Men det fanns inga uppgifter om hur och nr tgrden skulle genomfras, och brist p finansiering fr att genomfra systemet uppgavs vara det strsta problemet.
97 When it has been observed that emission limits have been exceeded, fines are due according to the legal provisions in all four Member States: я in the case of direct discharge, the fines are imposed by the public inspection body. 
97 Enligt lagstiftningen i alla fyra medlemsstaterna utgr bter om utslppsgrnsvrden verskrids: Ń Vid direkta utslpp r det offentliga inspektionsorganet som utdmer bter.
The procedure is the same as the one applied for urban waste water treatment plants (see paragraphs 76 and 77); я in the case of indirect discharge, the fines are imposed by the operators of the urban waste water treatment plants. 
Frfarandet r detsamma som tillmpas fr anlggningar fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse (se punkterna 76 och 77).
While for Hungary and Romania the fine relates to the quantity of pollution61 discharged between two measurements (in a year), in the Czech Republic and Slovakia the amount calculated generally refers to the quantity of pollution discharged on the day the measurement took place62. 
I Ungern och Rumnien r btesbeloppet kopplat till den mngd frore-ningar61 som slpps ut mellan tv mtningar (under ett r), medan det i Tjeckien och Slovakien i allmnhet berknas utifrn den mngd froreningar som slpps ut p mtdagen62.
Water pollution charge partially used as an instrument to deter the emission of pollutants 98 The number of pollutants for which a charge is due is particularly limited in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia (see Annex IV). 
Vattenfroreningsavgiften anvndes delvis som ett instrument fr att avskrcka frn utslpp av frorenande mnen 98 Antalet avgiftsbelagda frorenande mnen r srskilt begrnsat i Tjeckien, Ungern och Slovakien (se bilaga IV).
Therefore the charge can rarely serve as an incentive either to comply with or to go beyond the limits set in the permit. Measures and instruments implemented by the Member States in order to tackle diffuse pollution from agriculture 99 An important way to reduce emissions from agriculture is to regulate farming practices (e.g. rules on the use of fertilisers, the storage of manure, the use of pesticides, crop rotation, etc.). 
Avgiften fungerar drfr sllan som ett incitament att respektera eller g lngre n de grnsvrden som faststllts i tillstndet. tgrder och instrument som medlemsstaterna har genomfrt fr att frska komma till rtta med diffusa froreningar frn jordbruket 99 Ett viktigt stt att minska utslppen frn jordbruket r att reglera jordbruksmetoderna (t.ex. regler fr gd-selmedelanvndning, gdsellagring, anvndning av bekmpningsmedel och vxelbruk).
Several instruments are available (see paragraph 15) for imposing or encouraging good farming practices and promoting the compliance of farming activities with environmental legislation. 
Flera instrument finns tillgngliga (se punkt 15) fr att pbju-da eller uppmuntra god lantbrukspraxis och verka fr att jordbruksverksamhet fljer miljlagstiftningen.
61 This corresponds to the quantity discharged in excess of the consented quantity (volume multiplied by a concentration expressed for example in mg/l). 
61 Det handlar om den mngd som slpps ut utver den godknda kvantiteten (volymen multiplicerad med en koncentration uttryckt i t.ex. mg/l).
62 Contracts generally specify a standard time period (usually ranging from 5 to 30 days) if the precise time period during which emission limits were exceeded cannot be specified. 
62 Kontrakten anger i regel en standardperiod (vanligtvis mellan fem och 30 dagar) om den exakta tidsperiod under vilken utslppsgrnsvrdena verskreds inte kan anges.
Observations 38 100 Therefore the Court examined whether: я the nitrates directive is used to best effect as an instrument to address nitrate pollution; я the national pesticides action plans show a clear commitment towards a reduction of the risks and the impacts associated with the use of pesticides; я cross-compliance is effective in requiring good farming practices and ensuring compliance with these practices; я the potential of rural development measures to address water quality issues is being adequately exploited; я the тpolluter paysу principle is being applied in the case of diffuse pollution from agriculture. 
Iakttagelser 38 100 Revisionsrtten granskade drfr huruvida Ń nitratdirektivet anvnds p bsta stt som ett instrument fr att komma till rtta med nitratfrorening, Ń de nationella handlingsplanerna mot bekmpningsmedel innehller ett tydligt tagande att minska de risker och effekter som anvndningen av bekmpningsmedel medfr, Ń tvrvillkoren p ett ndamlsenligt stt krver god lantbrukspraxis och skerstller att denna praxis fljs, Ń landsbygdsutvecklingstgrdernas potential att komma till rtta med vattenkvalitetsproblem utnyttjas p lmpligt stt, Ń principen att frorenaren betalar tillmpas p diffusa froreningar frn jordbruket.
102 Member States had to adopt action programmes specifying the requirements that are to be respected by farmers in nitratecvulnerable zones. These action programmes have to be reviewed and, if necessary, revised every 4 years. 
102 Medlemsstaterna var tvungna att anta tgrdsprogram som specificerade de krav som jordbrukare mste uppfylla i nitratknsliga omrden. tgrdsprogrammen ska ses ver vart fjrde r och om ndvndigt ndras.
If the Commission assesses their quality to be insufficient it is limited to taking legal action (see paragraph 47). 
Om kommissionen bedmer att kvaliteten p dem r otillrcklig r den hnvisad till rttsliga tgrder (se punkt 47).
63 Other criteria: (i) groundwaters containing more than 50 mg/l nitrates or that could contain more than 50 mg/l nitrates if action is not taken and (ii) surface freshwaters in particular those used or intended for the abstraction of drinking water containing or that could contain more than 25 or 50 mg/l nitrates as specified in Council Directive 75/440/EEC of 16 June 1975 concerning the quality required of surface water intended for the abstraction of drinking water in the Member States (OJ L 194, 25.7.1975, p. 
63 Andra kriterier: i) grundvatt-nets nitrathalt verstiger 50 mg/l eller kan komma att gra det om inga tgrder vidtas och ii) stt ytvatten som anvnds eller ska anvndas fr utvinning av dricksvatten har eller kan ha en hgre nitrathalt n 25 eller 50 mg/l, i enlighet med direktiv 75/440/EEG av den 16 juni 1975 om den kvalitet som krvs p det ytvatten som r avsett fr framstllning av dricksvatten i medlemsstaterna (EGT L 194, 25.7.1975, s.
Observations 39 Percentage of agricultural land designated as nitrate vulnerable as of 31.12.2014 Member State Percentage of agricultural land in nitrate-vulnerable zones Change since the first designation Czech Republic 49 % + 15 % Hungary 63 % + 42 % Romania 58 % + 625 % In 2013 the Romanian government decided that the action programme applies to the whole Romanian territory1. 
Iakttagelser 39 Andel jordbruksmark som angavs som nitratknslig per den 31 december 2014 Medlemsstat Andel jordbruksmark i nitratknsliga omrden Frndring sedan de frsta omrdena angavs Tjeckien 49 % + 15 % Ungern 63 % + 42 % Rumnien 58 % + 625 % r 2013 beslutade den rumnska regeringen att tgrdsprogrammet ska glla Rumniens hela territorium1.
Slovakia 57 % -5% 1 According to Article 3(5) of the nitrates directive, Member States are exempt from the obligation to identify specific vulnerable zones if they establish and apply action programmes throughout their national territory. 
Slovakien 57 % -5% 1 Enligt artikel 3.5 i nitratdirektivet behver inte medlemsstaterna ange srskilda, knsliga omrden om de upprttar och tillmpar tgrdsprogram fr hela sitt nationella territorium.
104 Romaniaуs decision to apply the action programme to the whole country is in principle positive from the point of view of water quality, particularly considering that Romania has the lowest number of water bodies subject to nutrient enrichment (see Annex II). 
104 Rumniens beslut att tillmpa tgrdsprogrammet p hela landet r i princip positivt frn vattenkvalitetssynpunkt, srskilt med tanke p att Rumnien har minst antal vattenfrekomster som pverkas av vergdning (se bilaga II).
In the previously designated zone (made up of only 58 % of the agricultural land) little progress was made in achieving appropriate manure storage, one of the requirements of the action programme (see also paragraph 122). 
I det tidigare angivna omrdet (som bestod av endast 58 % av jordbruksmarken) gjordes endast sm framsteg med att f till stnd lmplig lagring av gdsel, som r ett av kraven i tgrdsprogrammet (se ven punkt 122).
105 The Court found that the requirements of each revision of the action programmes of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Romania either increased in number or became stricter, whereas in Slovakia some of the requirements were eased. 
105 Revisionsrtten konstaterade att kraven efter varje versyn av tgrdsprogrammen i Tjeckien, Ungern och Rumnien antingen kade i antal eller skrptes, medan man i Slovakien lttade p vissa krav.
The strengthening of the requirements is partially due to Commission action (see examples in Box 1). 
Skrpningen av kraven beror delvis p kommissionens tgrder (se exempel i ruta 1).
The fact that a number of requirements also became more precise aids their application and enforcement. 
Det faktum att ett antal krav ocks preciserades bidrar till att de tillmpas och uppfylls.
Table 7 
Tabell 7
Observations 40 Examples of the effects of Commission requests made to the Czech Republic and Hungary Member States had to define the capacity of storage vessels for livestock manure. 
Iakttagelser 40 Exempel p effekterna av kommissionens krav p Tjeckien och Ungern Medlemsstaterna var tvungna att ange kapaciteten hos lagringsutrymmen fr stallgdsel.
The capacity should be such that the vessel can store the manure produced for a period at least as long as the period during which no manure is allowed to be applied on the land. 
Kapaciteten ska vara av ett sdant slag att det i utrymmet gr att lagra det gdsel som producerats under en period som r minst lika lng som den period d gdsel inte fr anvndas p marken.
The capacity is thus expressed in months. 
Kapaciteten uttrycks sledes i mnader.
In the Czech Republic the capacity was increased as a result of Commission action. 
I Tjeckien kade kapaciteten till fljd av kommissionens tgrd.
Immediate compliance with the requirement was not requested from those farmers that newly came under the obligation in 2012 with the increase in nitrate-vulnerable zones. 
De jordbrukare som omfattades av skyldigheten sedan 2012, d de nitratknsliga omrdena utkades, behvde inte uppfylla kravet omedelbart.
Instead they benefited from a transitional period (deadline for compliance: end of 2015). 
I stllet kunde de dra nytta av en vergngsperiod (tidsfrist till utgngen av 2015).
This period was abolished as a result of Commission action with effect from mid-2014. 
Denna period avskaffades till fljd av kommissionens tgrd med verkan frn och med mitten av 2014.
In Hungary, the Commission discussed storage obligations and transitional periods with the competent authorities. 
I Ungern diskuterade kommissionen lagringsskyldigheter och vergngsperioder med de behriga myndigheterna.
For certain farmers the initial deadlines were extended until 31 December 2014. 
Fr vissa jordbrukare frlngdes de ursprungliga tidsfristerna till den 31 december 2014.
These farmers thus had 10 years from the countryуs accession to comply with the requirements. 
Dessa jordbrukare hade drfr tio r p sig efter landets anslutning till EU att uppfylla kraven.
For farmers in areas newly designated as nitrate vulnerable in 2013, the deadline was 31 December 2014 for slurry storage and 22 December 2015 for manure storage. 
Fr jordbrukare i omrden som angavs vara nitratknsliga 2013 var tidsfristen den 31 december 2014 nr det gllde flytgdsel och den 22 december 2015 nr det gllde gdsellagring.
However, these transitional deadlines set by the Hungarian authorities were not challenged by the Commission. 
Dessa mellanliggande tidsfrister som de ungerska myndigheterna hade faststllt ifrgasattes dock inte av kommissionen.
Observations 41 Examples of requirements in Hungary and Romania that are less demanding than the recommendations in the study conducted on behalf of the Commission In Hungary the period during which the land application of certain types of fertiliser is prohibited runs from 31 October to 15 February (3 1з2 months). 
Iakttagelser 41 Exempel p krav i Ungern och Rumnien som inte r lika strnga som rekommendationerna i den studie som genomfrdes fr kommissionens rkning I Ungern lper den period d det r frbjudet att sprida vissa typer av gdselmedel p jordbruksmark frn den 31 oktober till den 15 februari (tre och en halv mnad).
The recommendations suggested a period from 1 August to 1 February (6 months) for arable lands with a likely uncertainty of plus/minus 1 month. 
I rekommendationerna freslogs en period frn den 1 augusti till den 1 februari (sex mnader) fr kermark med en marginal p plus minus en mnad.
In Romania the general rule is that fertiliser application is not allowed within 1 metre of a watercourse on a physical block of land with an average slope up to 12 % and within 3 metres on a physical block of land with a slope above 12 %. 
I Rumnien r den generella regeln att spridning av gdselmedel inte r tillten inom en meter frn ett vattendrag p ett skifte med en genomsnittlig lutning p upp till 12 % och inom tre meter p ett skifte med en lutning p mer n 12 %.
There are other specific rules for various types of water protection areas. 
Det finns andra specifika regler fr olika typer av vattenskyddsomrden.
The recommendations suggested buffer strips64 of at least 25 metres in width and in the case of sloping land (above 8 %) the buffer strips should be doubled or even tripled. 
I rekommendationerna freslogs buffertzoner64 med en bredd p minst 25 meter, och p sluttande mark (ver 8 %) skulle de vara dubbelt eller till och med tre gnger s stora.
In its correspondence with Romania the Commission also was of the opinion that the buffer strips were not wide enough but did not pursue this issue. 
I sin brevvxling med Rumnien angav kommissionen ocks att buffertzonerna inte var tillrckligt breda men den drev aldrig frgan vidare.
64 Strip of land along a watercourse for which farming restrictions exist such as limitations with regard to fertilisation. 
64 Landremsa lngs ett vattendrag fr vilken odlingsrestriktioner gller, t.ex. gdslingsbegrnsningar.
106 Even though the requirements have been tightened up they are still less demanding than those set out in a 2011 study65 conducted on behalf of the Commission and used by the Commission in its assessments of the action plans. 
106 ven om kraven har skrpts r de fortfarande inte lika strnga som de som angavs i en studie frn 201165 som gjordes fr kommissionens rkning och som anvndes av kommissionen nr den bedmde handlingsplanerna.
Examples are given in Box 2. 
Exempel finns i ruta 2.
107 Several issues66 for which Member States had or could define requirements under the nitrates directive became issues for which Member States had to define standards under GAEC67. 
107 Medlemsstaterna hade faststllt eller kunde faststlla krav enligt nitratdirektivet nr det gllde flera faktorer66 fr vilka de ocks mste faststlla normer fr god jordbrukshvd och goda miljfrhllanden67.
The Court found that the GAEC standards for тland managementу and тmaintenance of a minimum soil coverу are either identical or even stricter than what is included in the action programmes of the four Member States. 
Revisionsrtten konstaterade att de normer fr god jordbrukshvd och goda miljfrhllanden som avser markanvndning och bibehllande av ett minimikrav fr marktckning antingen r identiska med eller till och med strngare n vad som ingr i de fyra medlemsstaternas tgrdsprogram.
In addition, there is scope for further enhancement of the standards (see paragraph 135). 
Normerna kan dessutom skrpas ytterligare (se punkt 135).
65 See final report presented to the Commission in December 2011 тRecommendations for establishing action programmes under Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sourcesу by a consortium (DLO-Alterra Wageningen UR, DLO-Plant Research International Wageningen UR, NEIKER Tecnalia, Derio, Spain, Institute of Technology and Life Sciences (ITP), Warsaw, Poland, Swedish Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering (JTI), Uppsala). 
65 Se den slutrapport som presenterades fr kommissionen i december 2011 Recommendations for establishing Action Programmes under Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (rekommendationer om upprttande av tgrdsprogram i enlighet med direktiv 91/676/EEG om skydd mot att vatten frorenas av nitrater frn jordbruket) av ett konsortium (DLO-Alterra Wageningen UR, DLO-Plant research International Wageningen UR, NEIKER Tecnalia, Derio, Spanien, Institute of Technology and Life Sciences (ITP), Warszawa, Polen och Institutet fr jordbruks-och miljteknik (JTI), Uppsala).
These recommendations by climatic zone were only made available in 2011, thus 20 years after the approval of the nitrates directive. 
Dessa rekommendationer per klimatzon utfrdades allts frst 2011, dvs. 20 r efter det att nitratdirektivet antogs.
66 These issues are: conditions for land application of fertilisers near water courses, land use management (including crop rotation systems) and maintenance of a minimum quantity of vegetation cover during rainy periods. 
66 Dessa faktorer r fljande: villkor fr spridning av gdselmedel i nrheten av vattendrag, planer fr markutnytt-jandet (inbegripet system fr vxelbruk) och bibehllande under nederbrdsperioder av ett minimum av vxtlighet.
The last two are optional. 
De tv sistnmnda r frivilliga.
67 The general agricultural and environmental conditions concerned are: soil erosion (including minimum land management reflecting Box 2 
67 De generella jordbruks-och miljfrhllanden som berrs r fljande: markerosion Ruta 2
Observations 42 108 With regard to fertilisers, Member States specified limitations as to the amount of nitrogen to be applied (kg/ ha). 
Iakttagelser 42 108 Vad betrffar gdselmedel angav medlemsstaterna grnsvrden fr den mngd kvve som kan spridas (kg/ha).
However, they did not use the opportunity to provide similar limitations for phosphorus68. 
Men de utnyttjade inte tillfllet till att faststlla liknande begrnsningar fr fosfor68.
Shortcomings in the Slovak and Czech action programmes have led to further Commission actions 109 In November 2012 the Commission started an infringement procedure against Slovakia on the second action programme which had been approved in 2011. 
Brister i Slovakiens och Tjeckiens tgrdsprogram har lett till ytterligare tgrder frn kommissionens sida 109 I november 2012 inledde kommissionen ett vertrdelsefrfarande mot Slovakien om det andra tgrdspro-gammet, som hade godknts 2011.
A тpilot procedureу with the Czech Republic was begun in January 2013 on the third action programme approved in 2012. 
Ett pilotfrfarande inleddes med Tjeckien i januari 2013 om det tredje tgrds-programmet, som godkndes 2012.
110 As of November 2015, there was not yet a final position of the Commission as a result of the information provided by the two Member States69 concerned and the actions taken by them. Action programmes have no effect yet on fertiliser consumption and effect on eutrophication is difficult to assess 111 One indicator that can capture the adequacy of the requirements imposed on farmers is the evolution of nitrogen fertiliser consumption. 
110 I november 2015 hade kommissionen nnu inte kommit fram till en slutlig stndpunkt till fljd av den information som de tv berrda medlemssta-terna69 hade lmnat och de tgrder som de vidtagit. tgrdsprogrammen har nnu ingen effekt p frbrukningen av gdselmedel, och effekten p eutrofiering r svr att bedma 111 En bra indikator p om de krav som lagts jordbrukarna r lmpliga r utvecklingen av frbrukningen av kvvegdselmedel.
Mineral70 fertiliser consumption increased in all four Member States over the 2004-2012 pe-riod71 while the arable land surface did not change significantly. At the same time consumption of organic fertilisers (such as manure) does not show a clear trend, either upwards or downwards. 
Frbrukningen av mineralgdselmedel70 kade i alla fyra medlemsstaterna under perioden 2004Đ201271, medan arealen kermark inte kade nmnvrt. Samtidigt finns det inte ngon klar trend vare sig uppt eller nedt nr det gller frbrukningen av organiska gdselmedel (ssom gdsel).