natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
74 In order to show what has been achieved with the EU budget spent on rural infrastructure measures, Member States should collect data on the outputs and results achieved by projects. 
74 Fr att kunna visa vad som har uppntts med den del av EU-budgeten som anvnts till landsbygdsinfrastruk-turtgrder ska medlemsstaterna samla in uppgifter om den output och de resultat som projekten har levererat.
Under the common monitoring and evaluation framework (CMEF), Member States must collect information for at least the following output and result indicators (see Table). 
Enligt den gemensamma vervaknings-och utvrderingsramen (CMEF) mste medlemsstaterna samla in information om tminstone fljande outputoch resultatindikatorer (se tabell).
32 ‘Public procurement guidance for practitioners on the avoidance of common errors in ESI-Funded projects’. 
32 Public Procurement Guidance for Practitioners on the avoidance of common errors in ESI Funded projects (vgledning i offentlig upphandling fr ansvariga om hur man undviker vanliga fel i ESI-finansierade projekt).
33 Ex ante conditionalities have been introduced by Articles 2 and 19 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 as prerequisites for the effective and efficient achievement of specific objectives for Union priorities. 
33 Frhandsvillkor infrdes genom artiklarna 2 och 19 i frordning (EU) nr 1303/2013 som en frutsttning fr ndamlsenlig och effektiv uppfyllelse av unionens prioriteringars srskilda ml.
The ex ante conditionality on public procurement refers to ’the existence of arrangements for the effective application of Union public procurement law in the field of the European Structural Investment Funds’. 
Frhandsvillkoret fr offentlig upphandling r Óatt det finns former fr effektiv tillmpning av unionsrtten om offentlig upphandling p omrdet fr de europeiska struktur-och investeringsfondernaÓ.
34 ECA Special Report No 10/2015 ‘Efforts to address problems with public procurement in EU cohesion expenditure should be intensified’, recommendation No 2 (http://eca.europa. eu). 
34 Rekommendation 2 i revisionsrttens srskilda rapport nr 10/2015 Mer behver gras fr att tgrda problemen vid offentlig upphandling inom EU:s sammanhllningsutgifter (http://eca.europa.eu).
Details about the new system are provided from paragraph 85 onwards. 
Nrmare uppgifter om det nya systemet finns i punkt 85 och framt.
75 Given the co-financing element, and irrespective of the monitoring and evaluation work required by the CMEF, Member States have a vested interest in project monitoring, as this is an important tool with which to keep track of projects’ progress and to be kept informed as to whether they are achieving the expected results and the RDP objectives. Monitoring could be carried out by using the administrative and control information available and by periodically collecting relevant information from the beneficiaries35. 
75 Med hnsyn till medfinansieringsdelen och oberoende av det vervaknings-och utvrderingsarbete som krvs enligt den gemensamma vervaknings- och utvrderingsramen har medlemsstaterna intresse av projektvervakning eftersom det r ett viktigt verktyg fr att hlla reda p projektens framsteg och hlla sig informerad om huruvida de uppnr de frvntade resultaten och mlen i landsbygdsprogrammet. vervakningen kan genomfras med hjlp av den administrativa information och kontrollinformation som finns och genom att relevant information regelbundet samlas in frn stdmottagarna35.
Member States can set additional, programme-specific indicators (within or outside the CMEF system). 
Medlemsstaterna fr faststlla kompletterande programspecifika indikatorer (inom eller utanfr den gemensamma vervaknings- och utvrderingsramen).
76 The Court examined the data collection and monitoring systems in the Member States audited and found, as in previous reports36, that there was an absence of relevant and reliable information to draw a conclusion on the effectiveness of these measures. 
76 Vi granskade uppgiftsinsamlings-och vervakningssystemen i de granskade medlemsstaterna och konstaterade liksom i tidigare rapporter36 att det saknades relevant och tillfrlitlig information fr att man skulle kunna dra ngon slutsats om tgrdernas ndamlsenlighet.
Therefore, the auditors measured project results and, where applicable, the achievement of the specific project objectives, on the basis of evidence obtained from project visits. 
Drfr mtte revisorerna projektresultaten och i frekommande fall uppfyllelsen av specifika projektml utifrn de bevis som inhmtats vid projektbesken.
More information on the audited projects can be found in Annex II. 
I bilaga II finns nrmare information om de granskade projekten.
35 At least until the expiry of the 5-year period for retaining the assets determined by Article 72 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. 
35 tminstone under den femrsperiod d insatsen fr behlla stdet enligt artikel 72 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 1698/2005.
36 See Special Reports Nos 8/2012, 1/2013, 6/2013 and 12/2013 (http://eca.europa.eu). Table 
36 Se de srskilda rapporterna nr 8/2012, nr 1/2013, nr 6/2013 och nr 12/2013 (http://eca. europa.eu). Tabell
Observations 38 The audited projects delivered the expected physical outputs, but reliable information on project results was often unavailable 77 All 32 audited projects delivered the expected physical outputs (e.g. modernisation of a road, construction of a sewerage system) and 20 of them respected the deadlines indicated in the grant agreement and/or in the contract for works. 
Iakttagelser 38 De granskade projekten levererade den fysiska output som frvntades men tillfrlitlig information om projektresultaten fanns ofta inte tillgnglig 77 Alla 32 granskade projekt levererade den fysiska output som frvntades (t.ex. modernisering av en vg, uppfrande av ett avloppssystem), och 20 av dem respekterade tidsfristerna i bidragsverenskommelsen och/eller i kontraktet om bygg-och anlgg-ningsarbetena.
The delays that occurred were in certain cases partially justified by bad weather conditions or other circumstances beyond the beneficiaries’ control. 
De frseningar som frekom motiverades i vissa fall delvis av dliga vderfrhllanden eller andra omstndigheter som lg utanfr stdmottagarnas kontroll.
78 By achieving the expected outputs, some of the projects also automatically achieved their objectives in terms of results, for example by improving the flood protection of a certain area (see Box 13). 
78 Genom att frvntad output levererades uppndde vissa projekt ocks automatiskt sina ml i frga om resultat, t.ex. genom att versvmningsskyddet i ett bestmt omrde frbttrades (se ruta 13).
Example of a project that generated the expected output and result Poland The audited project involving the extension and modernisation of a pumping station, with an estimated cost of 700 000 euro, was completed in line with technical specifications, with approximately 100 000 euro in savings compared to the budget approved (obtained through competitive tendering), and with a delay of 5 months due to the late delivery of an administrative document. 
Exempel p ett projekt som levererade den output och de resultat som frvntades Polen Det granskade projektet, som inbegrep utbyggnad och modernisering av en pumpanlggning till en uppskattad kostnad av 700 000 euro, avslutades i enlighet med de tekniska specifikationerna, med ungefr 100 000 euro i besparingar i frhllande till den godknda budgeten (tack vare ett konkurrensutsatt anbuds-frfarande) och med fem mnaders frsening p grund av att ett administrativt dokument levererades sent.
The new, more powerful pumping station was needed after the extensive flooding of almost 800 ha in the region in 2001 and improved the protection of 320 ha of agricultural land against seasonal flooding. 
Den nya kraftfullare pumpanlggningen behvdes efter en omfattande versvmning p nra 800 ha i regionen 2001 och den frbttrade skyddet av 320 ha jordbruksmark mot rstidsbetingade versvmningar.
Observations 39 79 However, this is not always the case. 
Iakttagelser 39 79 Men detta r inte alltid fallet.
It is possible for projects to fail to achieve the intended results, despite delivering the agreed physical outputs. 
Det kan hnda att projekt inte uppnr frvntade resultat trots att den fysiska output som man har enats om har levererats.
The audit found that the Member States did not collect reliable information regarding the short-to medium-term success of the projects in terms of achieving RDP objectives and the project-specific targets. 
Vid revisionen konstaterade vi att medlemsstaterna inte samlade in tillfrlitlig information om hur framgngsrika projekten hade varit p kort och medellng sikt nr det gllde att uppn mlen i landsbygdsprogrammet och projektspecifika delml.
This was mainly due to the failure to establish relevant indicators and an absence of specific objectives and targets in the application and grant decision. 
Det berodde frmst p att de inte lyckades faststlla relevanta indikatorer och p att det saknades srskilda ml och delml i anskan och i bidragsbeslutet.
For example, although the RDP for Italy (Sicily) set the objective of achieving water savings through investments in water infrastructure, the authorities had not established an indicator that would allow them to assess the achievement of this objective; the projects audited also lacked related quantifiable targets. 
I landsbygdsprogrammet fr Italien (Sicilien) t.ex. ingick mlet att gra vattenbesparingar genom investeringar i vatteninfrastruktur, men myndigheterna hade inte faststllt ngon indikator som gjorde att det gick att bedma om mlet hade uppntts; de granskade projekten saknade ven motsvarande kvantifierbara delml.
80 At the date of the audit, three out of the five Member States audited (Spain (Extremadura), Italy (Sicily) and Poland) had not submitted the mandatory monitoring information required by the CMEF regarding the measure 125 result indicator, ‘increase in gross value added in supported holdings’. 
80 Nr revisionen utfrdes hade tre av de fem granskade medlemsstaterna (Spanien (Extremadura), Italien (Sicilien) och Polen) inte lmnat in den obligatoriska vervakningsinformation som krvs enligt den gemensamma vervaknings-och utvrderingsramen om resultatindikatorn fr tgrd 125, Óka bruttofrdlingsvrdet hos de fretag som fr stdÓ.
The remaining two Member States (Germany (Saxony) and Romania) reported a value for this indicator, which was however based on unreliable information (see Box 14). 
De tv andra medlemsstaterna (Tyskland (Sachsen) och Rumnien) rapporterade ett vrde fr indikatorn, som dock grundades p otillfrlitlig information (se ruta 14).
Unreliable data collection method: financial data from farms not taken into account in measuring their competitiveness Romania The indicator ‘increase in gross value added in supported holdings’ aims to quantify the impact of measure 125 on the competitiveness of agricultural and forestry holdings supported. 
Otillfrlitlig uppgiftsinsamlingsmetod: finansiella uppgifter frn jordbruksfretag beaktades inte nr deras konkurrenskraft mttes Rumnien Syftet med indikatorn Óka bruttofrdlingsvrdet hos de fretag som fr stdÓ r att kvantifiera tgrd 125:s effekt p konkurrenskraften hos de jordbruks-och skogsbruksfretag som fick std.
However, in Romania the indicator was calculated at the level of the whole commune where the project was implemented (based on the commune’s financial accounts) and not for the farms benefiting from the new roads. 
Men i Rumnien berknades indikatorn fr hela den kommun dr projekten genomfrdes (utifrn kommunens finansiella rkenskaper) och inte fr de jordbruksfretag som drog nytta av de nya vgarna.
81 As regards the result indicator for measures 321, 322 and 323, ‘population in rural areas benefiting from improved services’, Member States reported the entire population of the commune where the project was implemented, irrespective of the number of actual users of the financed infrastructure (see Box 15). 
81 Nr det gller resultatindikatorn fr tgrderna 321, 322 och 323, Ólandsbygdsbefolkning som fr ta del av frbttrade tjnsterÓ, rapporterade medlemsstaterna hela befolkningen i den kommun dr projektet genomfrdes, oavsett antalet faktiska anvndare av den finansierade infrastrukturen (se ruta 15).
This reporting method leads to inflated figures, especially since when several projects are implemented in a single commune, the entire population of the commune is reported for each of these projects, and is thus counted several times when the figures are aggregated. 
Den hr rapporteringsmetoden leder till uppdrivna siffror, srskilt i de fall dr flera projekt genomfrs i en enda kommun och hela befolkningen rapporteras fr vart och ett av dessa projekt och drmed rknas flera gnger nr siffrorna sammanstlls.
Observations 40 Example of a project for which the total population of a commune was considered as benefiting from a new investment, although the project concerned only a limited number of inhabitants Germany (Saxony) For a project concerning the refurbishment of a 200-metre stretch of village road, the German authorities reported under the result indicator for measure 322, ‘population in rural areas benefiting from improved services’, that 40 631 people were benefiting from this investment. 
Iakttagelser 40 Exempel p ett projekt dr kommunens hela befolkning ansgs dra nytta av en ny investering, trots att projektet endast gllde ett begrnsat antal invnare Tyskland (Sachsen) Inom ett projekt som gllde upprustning av en 200 meter lng strcka av en byvg rapporterade de tyska myndigheterna fr resultatindikatorn fr tgrd 322, Ólandsbygdsbefolkning som fr ta del av frbttrade tjnsterÓ, att 40 631 mnniskor drog nytta av investeringen.
This is the total number of people living in the commune; however, only a small proportion of them actually use the road, as about 300 people live in the village where the project was implemented. 
Det r det totala antalet invnare i kommunen, men bara en liten andel av dem anvnder vgen i praktiken eftersom endast cirka 300 invnare bor i den by dr projektet genomfrdes.
In its annual progress report for 2014, Saxony reported under the measure 322 result indicator that 2.9 million people were benefiting from improved services in rural areas. 
I den rliga lgesrapporten fr 2014 rapporterade Sachsen fr resultatindikatorn fr tgrd 322 att 2,9 miljoner mnniskor tog del av frbttrade tjnster i landsbygdsomrden.
This is more than the state’s total rural population of about 2 million people. 
Det r mer n regionens hela landsbygds-befolkning p cirka 2 miljoner invnare.
82 Even when the audited Member States did set out additional, programme-specific indicators, these were incapable of measuring the success of the interventions. 
82 Inte heller nr de granskade medlemsstaterna faststllde kompletterande programspecifika indikatorer kunde de mta hur framgngsrika insatserna hade varit.
Firstly, Member States did not set targets. Secondly, the additional indicators measured outputs such as the number of kilometres of road repaired, rather than results related to the RDP objectives, such as achieving water savings, allowing farmers to reduce transport costs and providing certain services to the rural population. 
Fr det frsta faststllde medlemsstaterna inga delml och fr det andra mtte de kompletterande indikatorerna output som antalet kilometer upprustad vg och inte resultatet i frhllande till mlen i landsbygdsprogrammet, som att gra vattenbesparingar, gra det mjligt fr jordbrukare att minska sina transportkostnader och erbjuda landsbygdsbefolkningen vissa tjnster.
83 Twenty of the 32 audited projects lacked measurable targets for results. 
83 Av de 32 granskade projekten saknade 20 mtbara delml avseende resultat.
However, the auditors could obtain some data on the actual results achieved (see examples in Box 16 and detailed information in Annex II). 
Men revisorerna kunde inhmta en del uppgifter om de faktiska resultat som hade uppntts (se exemplen i ruta 16 och nrmare uppgifter i bilaga II).
Whilst certain positive results were observed in 13 cases, in 10 of these the information was not sufficient to allow the auditors to conclude on the projects’ effectiveness in addressing RDP objectives. 
Vissa positiva resultat konstaterades visserligen i 13 fall, men i tio av dem var informationen inte tillrcklig fr att revisorerna skulle kunna dra ngon slutsats om hur ndamlsenliga projekten var nr det gllde att uppn mlen i landsbygdsprogrammet.
In four cases, the relevant indicators showed that targets had not been achieved. 
I fyra fall visade de aktuella indikatorerna att delmlen inte hade uppntts.
In three further cases, the information obtained was not reliable. 
I ytterligare tre fall var den inhmtade informationen inte tillfrlitlig.
Observations 41 Limited evidence of positive results and unreliable data In Italy (Sicily) and Spain (Extremadura), the authorities did not collect data on individual project results. 
Iakttagelser 41 Begrnsade bevis p positiva resultat och otillfrlitliga uppgifter I Italien (Sicilien) och Spanien (Extremadura) samlade myndigheterna inte in uppgifter om enskilda projektresultat.
Upon the auditors’ request, only three of the eight and respectively two of the seven audited beneficiaries in these two regions could provide some quantified result data. 
P revisorernas begran var det bara tre av de tta respektive tv av de sju granskade stdmottagarna i de tv regionerna som kunde f fram en del kvantifierade uppgifter om resultatet.
The data generally showed a positive effect of the investments. 
Uppgifterna visade i regel investeringarnas positiva effekt.
However, one project for relaying asphalt on a rural road in a tourist area of Spain (Extremadura) did not have a positive impact on the number of tourists. 
Men ett projekt som gllde asfaltering av en landsvg i ett turistomrde i Spanien (Extremadura) hade ingen positiv effekt p antalet turister.
The average number of visitors had actually decreased in the years following the project completion, compared to the average number of visitors before the project. 
Det genomsnittliga antalet beskare hade faktiskt minskat ren efter det att projektet hade avslutats om man jmfr med det genomsnittliga antalet beskare fre projektet.
There was no information regarding the effects of the investment on the agricultural holdings. 
Det fanns ingen information om investeringens effekter p jordbruksfretagen.
In Romania, the beneficiaries provided to the auditors quantified target and result data for four of the five audited projects, which received grants ranging between 1 and 2.4 million euro. 
I Rumnien gav stdmottagarna revisorerna kvantifierade uppgifter om delml och resultat fr fyra av de fem granskade projekten, som fick bidrag p mellan en och 2,4 miljoner euro.
Only one project had reached its target of connecting 575 users to the new water and sewerage system. 
Endast ett projekt hade uppntt sitt delml att ansluta 575 anvndare till det nya vatten-oh avloppssystemet.
Three other projects were still far from achieving their targets almost 3 years after project completion: less than half of the target number of users had been connected to the sewerage network for two water projects and no new jobs had been created for the remaining project, although creating employment was one of its objectives. 
Tre andra projekt var fortfarande lngt ifrn att uppn sina delml nstan tre r efter det att projektet hade avslutats: mindre n hlften av det antal anvndare som var mlet hade anslutits till avloppsntet i tv vattenprojekt och inga nya arbetstillfllen hade skapats i det terstende projektet, trots att skapande av sysselsttning var ett av mlen.
In Germany (Saxony), the data reported for the three main result indicators established for the measures were based on the authorities’ assumptions on the likely result deriving from an investment. 
I Tyskland (Sachsen) grundades de uppgifter som rapporterades fr de tre huvudsakliga resultatindikatorerna fr tgrderna p myndigheternas antaganden om det troliga resultatet av en investering.
Targets and actual result data were not available for these indicators. 
Det fanns inga uppgifter om delml och det faktiska resultatet fr dessa indikatorer.
The information that could be obtained by the auditors for the audited projects was therefore limited to basic indicators such as the number of households served by the financed roads. 
Den information som revisorerna kunde f fram om de granskade projekten var drfr begrnsad till grundlggande indikatorer som hur mnga hushll som anvnder de finansierade vgarna.
In Poland, for four of the five audited projects, the beneficiaries reported to the managing authority data on project results, which showed an increase in the number of users and a general achievement of project objectives. 
I Polen rapporterade stdmottagarna uppgifter till frvaltningsmyndigeten om projektresultat nr det gllde fyra av de fem granskade projekten som visade ett kat antal anvndare och allmn uppfyllelse av projektmlen.
However, in three cases, no supporting evidence was provided to allow the Court to verify the reported figures. 
Men i tre fall fanns det inga styrkande handlingar som gjorde att revisorerna kunde kontrollera de rapporterade uppgifterna.
Observations 42 The Commission has encouraged Member States to improve monitoring and evaluation, but some weaknesses are likely to persist in the 2014-2020 programming period 84 Although Member States are primarily responsible37 for collecting the data to feed output and result indicators, the Commission is responsible for monitoring and supervising the implementation of RDPs and publishes the information collected from Member States through the CMEF. 
Iakttagelser 42 Kommissionen har uppmanat medlemsstaterna att frbttra sin vervakning och utvrdering men en del brister kommer troligen att kvarst under programperioden 2014Đ2020 84 Medlemsstaterna har huvudansvaret37 fr att samla in uppgifter till outputoch resultatindikatorer, medan kommissionen ansvarar fr vervakningen och tillsynen av genomfrandet av landsbygdsprogrammen och offentliggr information som samlats in frn medlemsstaterna via den gemensamma vervaknings-och utvrderingsramen.
85 As regards the measure 125 result indicator ‘increase in gross value added in holdings/enterprises supported’, the Commission recognised that, despite the guidance provided in 2010 on the methodology to measure the GVA increase, most of the Member States faced difficulties in reliably assessing this indicator. 
85 Nr det gller resultatindikatorn fr tgrd 125, Óka bruttofrdlingsvrdet hos de fretag som fr stdÓ medgav kommissionen att de flesta medlemsstaterna trots vgledningen 2010 om hur man mter en kning av bruttofrdlingsvrdet hade svrt att bedma indikatorn p ett tillfrlitligt stt.
The Commission indicated that the new indicator will only be assessed by external evaluators, as Member States lack the required expertise within their administrations. 
Kommissionen har sagt att den nya indikatorn endast ska bedmas av externa utvrderare eftersom medlemsstaterna inte har de expertkunskaper som krvs inom sina frvaltningar.
An additional compulsory result indicator has been introduced in the 2014-2020 programming period for the equivalent measure 125, namely ‘percentage of irrigated land switching to more efficient irrigation system’. 
Fr programperioden 2014Đ2020 har ytterligare en obligatorisk resultatindikator infrts fr motsvarande tgrd 125, nmligen Óprocentandel bevattnad mark som stlls om till effektivare bevattningssystemÓ.