natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Regardless of the absence of legal obligation, ten Member States have on a voluntary basis adopted a national anti-fraud strategy and one Member State is updating its existing one. 12 
Trots att det inte r ett rttsligt krav har tio medlemsstater frivilligt antagit en nationell strategi mot bedrgerier och en medlemsstat hller p att uppdatera sin befintliga strategi.
The Commission’s 2014 guidance note on fraud risk assessment and effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures includes a voluntary template for an anti-fraud policy statement at programme level, the purpose of which is to indicate to beneficiaries and the public that programme authorities have zero tolerance for fraud and how they intend to fight fraud. 
Kommissionens vgledning Bedmning av risken fr bedrgerier samt effektiva och proportionella bestmmelser om bedrgeribekmpning frn 2014 innehller en mall fr en frivillig frklaring om bedrgeribekmpningspolicy p programniv, vars syfte r att klargra fr stdmottagarna och allmnheten att det r nolltolerans mot bedrgerier som gller och hur de frvaltande myndigheterna har fr avsikt att bekmpa bedrgerier.
The Commission also further refers to its guidance on how to assess management and control systems’ key requirements (KR), and in particular assessment criterion 7.3 in relation to KR7 on "proportionate and effective antifraud measures". Even though this KR does not refer to an anti-fraud policy per se but to the need to conduct a self-assessment leading to targeted controls on fraud risks identified, it makes clear what the position of the programme authorities against fraud should be. 
Kommissionen hnvisar ocks till sin vgledning om bedmningen av centrala krav i frvaltnings-och kontrollsystemen, srskilt bedmningskriterium 7.3 i samband med centralt krav 7 om Óproportionella och effektiva bedrgeribekmpningstgrderÓ. ven om detta centrala krav inte avser bedrgeribekmpningspolicyer i sig, utan behovet av att genomfra sjlvbedmningar som leder till mlinriktade kontroller, klargr det dock hur programmyndigheterna br frhlla sig till bedrgerier.
Non-compliance may lead under certain further conditions (i.e. in combination with other weaknesses) to interruption of payments or financial corrections by the Commission. 
Bristande efterlevnad kan under vissa omstndigheter (dvs. i kombination med andra brister) leda till avbrott i betalningen eller till finansiella korrigeringar frn kommissionens sida.
Recommendation 1 – Develop formal strategies and policies to combat fraud against EU funds (a) The Commission notes that the recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Rekommendation 1 Đ Utarbeta formella strategier och policyer fr att bekmpa bedrgerier mot EU-medel a) Kommissionen noterar att denna rekommendation vnder sig till medlemsstaterna.
The Commission fully supports the adoption of national anti-fraud strategies by Member States. 
Kommissionen ger sitt fulla std till att medlemsstaterna antar nationella strategier mot bedrgerier.
For this purpose, the Commission has developed under the auspices of the Advisory Committee for Coordination for Fraud Prevention (COCOLAF) guidelines for national anti-fraud strategies. (b) The Commission accepts the recommendation. 
I detta syfte har kommissionen under ledning av rdgivande samordningskommittn fr frebyggande av bedrgerier (Cocolaf) utformat riktlinjer fr nationella strategier mot bedrgerier. b) Kommissionen godtar rekommendationen.
The Commission will continue to encourage the adoption of national anti-fraud strategies by Member States and will continue to assist the Member States accordingly. 
Kommissionen kommer att fortstta att uppmuntra medlemsstaterna att infra nationella strategier mot bedrgerier och kommer att fortstta att hjlpa dem med detta.
However, it has no legal basis to require each managing authority to adopt a formal, stand-alone anti-fraud policy at OP level, but has recommended them to do so through its guidance. 
Kommissionen har dock ingen rttslig grund fr att begra att varje frvaltande myndighet antar en formell, fristende bedrgeribekmpningspolicy p operativ programniv, men har rekommenderat dem att gra detta i sin vgledning.
A clear policy statement per programme authority as provided in the Commission guidance is indeed an appropriate instrument to indicate to beneficiaries and the public how managing authorities intend to address the fight against fraud. 
En tydlig policyfrklaring per programmyndighet enligt kommissionens vgledning r absolut ett lmpligt instrument fr att klargra fr stdmottagarna och allmnheten hur de frvaltande myndigheterna har fr avsikt att bekmpa bedrgerier.
Those managing authorities who wish to go beyond the immediate regulatory requirements can use the template for an anti-fraud policy statement at the programme level provided in the guidance. 81. The Commission will carefully assess any amendment of this kind put forward by the co-legislators. 
De frvaltande myndigheter som vill g lngre n de direkta rttsliga kraven kan anvnda vgledningens mall fr en frivillig frklaring om bedrgeribekmpningspolicy p programniv. 81 Kommissionen kommer noggrant att bedma eventuella ndringar av detta slag som lggs fram av medlagstiftarna.
82. The conclusion of the external study on anti-fraud measures outsourced by the Commission shows that where the Commission’s fraud risk assessment tool is used for the OPs, the Member State’s approach is more formalised and structured and that in a majority of OPs a ‘self-assessment’ of the fraud risks is done. 
82 Slutsatserna frn den externa studie om medlemsstaternas bedrgeribekmpningstgrder som kommissionen bestllt visar att de medlemsstater som anvnder kommissionens verktyg fr bedmning av bedrgeririsk i sina operativa program har ett mer formaliserat och strukturerat tillvgagngsstt, och att sjlvbedmningar av bedrgeririsker grs i de flesta operativa program.
Managing authorities have not only mechanically used the Commission proposed mitigating measures, but have added some controls which were not in the suggested options, suggesting that some reflection was conducted on the best way to tackle the risks identified. 83. 
De frvaltande myndigheterna har inte bara konsekvent anvnt kommissionens freslagna begrnsningstgrder, utan har ven lagt till kontroller som inte fanns med bland de freslagna alternativen, vilket tyder p att de har vervgt hur de identifierade riskerna ska hanteras p bsta stt.
The anti-fraud measures expected to be put in place by Member States must comply with the principle of proportionality. 
83 De bedrgeribekmpningstgrder som medlemsstaterna frvntas infra mste vara frenliga med proportionalitetsprincipen. tgrderna kan alltid frbttras baserat p upptckta bedrgerier och nya identifierade risker.
The study outsourced by the Commission concluded that anti-fraud measures put in place are generally proportionate to the risks identified. 
Den studie kommissionen bestllt visade att de 14 bedrgeribekmpningstgrder som infrts generellt sett r proportionella till de identifierade riskerna.
Recommendation 2 – Make fraud risk assessment more robust by involving relevant external actors in the process The Commission notes that this recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Rekommendation2Đ Gra bedrgeririskbedmningen mer robust genom att involvera relevanta externa aktrer i processen Kommissionen noterar att denna rekommendation vnder sig till medlemsstaterna.
The Commission supports and promotes cooperation between Cohesion funds authorities and other key national anti-fraud players in general, and will continue to do so, in particular for programmes presenting particularly high risks, or with high financial volumes, in accordance with the principle of proportionality. 
Kommissionen stder och frmjar samarbete mellan de myndigheter som frvaltar sammanhllningspolitiska medel och andra viktiga nationella aktrer p bedrgeribekmpningsomrdet i allmnhet och kommer att fortstta att gra detta enligt proportionalitetsprincipen, srskilt fr program med srskilt hga risker eller stora finansiella volymer.
13 14 
84 Enligt den rttsliga ramen fr 2014Đ2020 r Óbestmmelser om bedrgeribekmpning med beaktande av konstaterade riskerÓ ett ytterligare obligatoriskt krav fr frvaltande myndigheter jmfrt med tidigare perioder (se artikel 125.4 c i frordning (EU) nr 1303/2013).
The Member States use not only the mitigating actions proposed by the Commission in its guidance, but have additionally developed their own measures. 
Medlemsstaterna anvnder inte bara de begrnsningstgrder som kommissionen freslr i sin vgledning, utan har dessutom tagit fram egna tgrder.
These additional controls per risk area operate at system and at project level and further include investigations by competent national investigative authorities. 
Dessa ytterligare kontroller per riskomrde tillmpas p system-och projektniv och omfattar dessutom utredningar som genomfrs av behriga nationella utredningsorgan.
Fraud detection is indeed part of the normal controls in place, both at managing authority level and at audit authority level. 
85 Upptckt av bedrgerier ingr i de normala kontroller som finns, hos bde de frvaltande myndigheterna och revisionsmyndigheterna.
The fact that system audits now cover the procedures in place for effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures (system key requirement KR 7) provides an additional tool to assess the adequacy of such measures, as shown by the audit assessments reported by audit authorities. 
Systemrevisionerna omfattar nu befintliga frfaranden fr effektiva och proportionella bedrgeribekmpningstgrder (centralt systemkrav 7). Detta utgr ett ytterligare verktyg fr att bedma tgrdernas lmplighet, vilket framgr av de revisionsbedmningar som rapporterats av revisionsmyndigheterna.
The opportunities of existing and available data-mining tools such as the one designed by the Commission, Arachne, are already used by some programme authorities in a more comprehensive way. 
En del programmyndigheter anvnder redan befintliga och tillgngliga datautvinningsverktyg, ssom Arachne som tagits fram av kommissionen, p ett mer vergripande stt.
For example, as a risk scoring and detection tool to check in the award and grant processes potential beneficiary companies, their beneficial owners and business partners, to assess potential conflicts of interest and risks of double funding, to identify red flags, and to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of management verifications.” 
Exempel p det r verktyg fr bedmning och upptckt av risker fr att kontrollera fretag som eventuellt ska f std, deras verkliga huvudmn och affrspartner i tilldelnings-och bidragsprocesser, i syfte att bedma eventuella intressekonflikter och risker fr dubbelfinansiering, identifiera rda flaggor och ka frvaltningskontrollernas ndamlsenlighet och effektivitet.
Arachne was modernized in accordance with users’ requirements in 2016 and the update covered the improvement of existing functionalities. 
Arachne moderniserades 2016 enligt anvndarnas behov, och uppdateringen omfattade frbttringar av de befintliga funktionerna.
It should be stressed again, that in the absence of a legal basis requiring its compulsory use, Arachne is offered to the Member States on a voluntary basis and free of charge by the Commission. 
Kommissionen betonar terigen att eftersom det saknas en rttslig grund fr obligatorisk anvndning av Arachne erbjuder den verktyget p frivillig basis och utan kostnad till medlemsstaterna.
It is up to the Member States whether to use the Arachne or any other tool and to what extent. 86. 
Det r upp till medlemsstaterna att bestmma om de vill anvnda Arachne eller ngot annat verktyg och i vilken utstrckning.
Managing authorities put increasing emphasis on the detection measures, e.g. of collusive bidding through verification measures, including development of checklists and red-flags, collaboration with public procurement and competition authorities and ad-hoc comparison of costs. Increased use of hotlines and other whistleblowing mechanisms is part of the recommendation from the Commission to the Member States included in the PIF Report 2017. 
86 De frvaltande myndigheterna lgger allt strre vikt vid tgrder fr att upptcka bedrgerier ssom uppgjorda anbud via kontrolltgrder, bland annat genom utformning av checklistor och rda flaggor, samarbete med myndigheter fr offentlig upphandling och konkurrensmyndigheter och fristende jmfrelser av kostnader. kad anvndning av hjlplinjer och andra visselblsarmekanismer r en av kommissionens rekommendationer till medlemsstaterna i PIF-rapporten 2017.
OLAF also provides ‘The Fraud Notification System, which is a web-based tool available to any person who seeks to pass on information concerning potential corruption and fraud. http://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/olaf-and-you/report-fraud_en The current proposal of the Whistleblower Directive includes the internal and external reporting channels ensuring confidentiality in all entities in the private and public sector, across the EU. 
Olaf tillhandahller ven ett anmlningssystem fr bedrgerier, ett webbaserat verktyg som finns tillgngligt fr alla som vill informera om eventuella fall av korruption och bedrgeri. http://ec.europa.eu/anti-fraud/olaf-and-you/report-fraud_en Det nuvarande frslaget till direktiv om skydd av visselblsare omfattar interna och externa rapporteringskanaler som skerstller konfidentialitet i alla enheter i den privata och den offentliga sektorn i hela EU.
87. It should be noted, that effectiveness of fraud prevention is by nature hard to measure and depends on exogenous factors. 
87 Kommissionen ppekar att effektiviteten hos tgrder fr frebyggande av bedrgerier r svr att mta och beror p externa faktorer.
Fraud detection can be tracked, but measuring its effectiveness would necessitate a comparison with the unknown total extent of fraud, including fraud. 
Omfattningen av upptckta bedrgerier kan spras, men fr att mta effektiviteten krvs en jmfrelse med den oknda sammanlagda omfattningen av bedrgeri, inklusive oupptckt bedrgeri.
However, as already indicated in the Commission's reply to Special Report 1/2019, there is no cost-effective method to estimate undetected fraud reliably and defendably enough for evidence-based policy. 
Ssom kommissionen redan anger i sitt svar p srskild rapport 1/2019 finns det ingen kostnadseffektiv metod fr att uppskatta oupptckt bedrgeri p ett stt som r tillrckligt tillfrlitligt och kan motiveras fr en evidensbaserad policy.
Member States must monitor and report fraud and regularly reassess and update the risks identified and proceed with additional proportionate mitigating controls, if necessary. 
Medlemsstaterna ska vervaka och rapportera bedrgeri och regelbundet omvrdera och uppdatera identifierade risker och vid behov infra ytterligare proportionella begrnsande kontroller.
Recommendation 3 – Improve fraud detection measures by generalising the use of data analytics tools and promoting the use of other ‘proactive’ fraud detection methods (a) The Commission notes that this recommendation is addressed to the Member States. 
Rekommendation 3 Đ Frbttra tgrderna fr att upptcka bedrgerier genom att sprida anvndningen av dataanalysverktyg och frmja andra ÓproaktivaÓ metoder fr upptckt av bedrgerier a) Kommissionen noterar att denna rekommendation vnder sig till medlemsstaterna.
The Commission supports and will continue to actively promote the use of any data-mining tool, including in particular Arachne, by programme authorities. 
Kommissionen stder och kommer att fortstta att aktivt frmja programmyndigheternas anvndning av datautvinningsverktyg, srskilt Arachne.
The Commission has designed Arachne specifically for the needs of programme authorities under Cohesion policy and provides it to Member States free of charge. 14 
Kommissionen har utformat Arachne, srskilt med tanke p programmyndigheternas behov inom ramen fr sammanhllningspolitiken, och tillhandahller verktyget till medlemsstaterna utan kostnad. b) Kommissionen godtar rekommendationen.
In line with its upcoming revised Anti-Fraud Strategy, the Commission will continue to issue documents to disseminate the best practices among national authorities in charge of the implementation of Cohesion Policy. 
I linje med sin kommande reviderade strategi mot bedrgerier kommer kommissionen att fortstta att utfrda dokument fr att sprida bsta praxis bland nationella myndigheter med ansvar fr genomfrandet av sammanhllningspolitiken.
Examples of such documents issued over the past years under the auspices of the Advisory Committee for Coordination of Fraud Prevention (COCOLAF) include: o Fraud in Public Procurement, A collection of Red Flags and Best Practices (2017) o Handbook: The role of Member States' auditors in fraud prevention and detection for EU Structural and Investment Funds, Experience and practice in the Member States (2014) o Detection of forged documents in the field of structural actions, A practical guide for managing authorities (2013) o Identifying conflicts of interests in public procurement procedures for structural actions, A practical guide for managers (2013) o Compendium of anonymised cases – Structural Actions (2012) Finally, some of the practices identified in the Member States by the external study on effective and proportionate anti-fraud measures outsourced by the Commission are made publicly available in a Compendium of anti-fraud practices for preventing and detecting fraud and corruption in ESIF on the Europa site. (c) The Commission partially accepts this recommendation. 
Exempel p sdana dokument som har utfrdats under de senaste ren under ledning av rdgivande samordningskommittn fr frebyggande av bedrgerier (Cocolaf) r o Fraud in Public Procurement, A collection of Red Flags and Best Practices (2017), o Handbook: The role of Member States' auditors in fraud prevention and detection for EU Structural and Investment Funds, Experience and practice in the Member States (2014), o Detection of forged documents in the field of structural actions, A practical guide for managing authorities (2013), o Identifying conflicts of interests in public procurement procedures for structural actions, A practical guide for managers (2013), o Compendium of anonymised cases Đ Structural Actions (2012).
Measuring the effectiveness of fraud prevention and detection methods is a highly complex and challenging task, as fraud is influenced by a great variety of exogenous factors, of which not all are policy domain specific. 
En del av de metoder som anvnds i medlemsstaterna som identifierats i den externa studie om effektiva och proportionella bedrgeribekmpningstgrder som bestllts av kommissionen grs allmnt tillgngliga p webbplatsen Europa i form av ett Ókompendium av bedrgeribekmpningsmetoder fr frebyggande och upptckt av bedrgeri och korruption i ESI-fondernaÓ. c) Kommissionen godtar delvis rekommendationen Att mta metodernas ndamlsenlighet fr att frebygga och upptcka bedrgerier r en ytterst komplex och utmanande uppgift, eftersom bedrgeri pverkas av ett stort antal yttre faktorer som inte alla r specifika fr politikomrdet i frga.
However, the Commission, in the framework of the revised Commission Anti-Fraud Strategy, is developing country profiles on the anti-fraud capabilities of Member States in relation to, inter alia, prevention and detection. 
Inom ramen fr sin reviderade strategi mot bedrgerier arbetar kommissionen emellertid med att ta fram landsprofiler om medlemsstaternas kapacitet p bedrgeribekmpningsomrdet, bland annat nr det gller frebyggande och upptckt.
These country profiles will help to better assess the implementation of fraud prevention and detection measures in the Member States. 
Landsprofiler kommer att bidra till att frbttra bedmningen av frebyggande och upptckt av bedrgerier i medlemsstaterna. 16
88. The Commission will carefully assess any amendment of this kind put forward by the co-legislators. 
88 Kommissionen kommer noggrant att bedma eventuella ndringar av detta slag som lggs fram av medlagstiftarna.
The Commission is actively encouraging the Member States to use data-mining tools, in particular Arachne. 
Kommissionen uppmuntrar aktivt medlemsstaterna att anvnda datautvinningsverktyg, srskilt Arachne.
89. The Commission pointed out several times in the PIF Reports the concrete possibility of under-reporting by some Member States. 
89 Kommissionen har i PIF-rapporterna flera gnger ppekat att det finns en konkret mjlighet att underrapportering frekommer frn vissa medlemsstaters sida.
The Commission is aiming, in the framework of its revised Anti-Fraud Strategy, at enhancing its analysis based on additional elements, in particular by developing country profiles to better understand differences in detection and reporting among Member States. 
Inom ramen fr sin reviderade strategi mot bedrgerier siktar kommissionen p att frbttra sin analys med hjlp av kompletterande inslag, srskilt genom att utforma landsprofiler fr att f kade kunskaper om skillnaderna nr det gller upptckt och rapportering mellan medlemsstaterna.
Furthermore, the analysis of the reasons for rejection of a potential fraudulent case by the competent authority is a shared responsibility between the managing authorities and the investigative bodies. 
Analysen av sklen till varfr en behrig myndighet avvisar misstnkta bedrgerifall r dessutom ett gemensamt ansvar fr de frvaltande myndigheterna och utredningsorganen.
In this context, AFCOS could play a larger role in ensuring a better coordination between the managing authorities and the judicial authority. 
I detta sammanhang kan sambandscentralerna spela en strre roll genom att skerstlla bttre samordning mellan de frvaltande myndigheterna och den rttsliga myndigheten.
In shared management, the Commission applies suspension of payments, interruption and financial corrections to Member States to ensure that the EU budget is effectively protected. 
I delad frvaltning tillmpar kommissionen betalningsinstllelse, avbrott och finansiella korrigeringar p medlemsstaterna fr att garantera ett effektivt skydd av EU-budgeten.
also protect the EU budget by withdrawing irregular or fraudulent expenditure from co-funded programmes. 
Medlemsstaterna skyddar ven EU-budgeten genom att dra tillbaka oriktiga eller bedrgliga utgifter frn medfinansierade program.
It is the Member States' responsibility to recover public funds from fraudsters, in line with national legislation or once national judicial proceedings confirmed fraud. 
Det r medlemsstaternas ansvar att tervinna offentliga medel frn personer som gjort sig skyldiga till bedrgeri, enligt nationell lagstiftning eller nr nationella rttsliga frfaranden har bekrftat frekomsten av bedrgeri.
The Commission regularly recalls the Member States' obligations regarding the possible horizontal implications of a single fraud case identified at programme level, based on the guidance note on fraud risk assessment, section 4.4. 
Kommissionen pminner regelbundet medlemsstaterna om deras skyldigheter i samband med eventuella vergripande konsekvenser av identifierade bedrgerifall p programniv, baserat p avsnitt 4.4 i vgledningen om bedmning av risken fr bedrgerier.
There are examples of Member States who have assessed the horizontal implications of potential fraud cases on their systems or for a specific beneficiary and applied corrective measures. 
Det finns exempel p medlemsstater som har bedmt hur de vergripande konsekvenserna av misstnkta bedrgerifall pverkar deras system eller en viss bidragsmottagare och vidtagit korrigerande tgrder.
Recommendation 4 – Monitor fraud response mechanisms to ensure they are consistently applied (a) The Commission accepts this recommendation. 
Rekommendation 4 Đ vervaka mekanismerna fr responstgrder fr att skerstlla att de tillmpas konsekvent a) Kommissionen godtar rekommendationen.