natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The outcome of the study will serve as a basis for the Commission to reflect on the possibilities to address overflow pollution in a systematic manner at EU level. 
Kommissionen kommer att anvnda underskningen som underlag fr att vervga mjligheterna att p ett systematiskt stt hantera froreningar i samband med versvmningar p EU-niv.
Reply of the Commission 72 41 Second indent The Commission shares the Courtуs view and is of the opinion that the measures to reduce erosion and prevent pollution should be more specifically set out in the RBMPs irrespective of whether they are linked to the Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions (GAEC) standard or not. 
Kommissionens svar 72 41 Andra strecksatsen Kommissionen instmmer i revisionsrttens sikter och anser att tgrderna fr att minska erosion och frebygga froreningar br anges mer specifikt i frvaltningsplanerna, oavsett om de r kopplade till normerna fr god jordbrukshvd och goda miljfrhllanden eller ej.
41 Third indent The Commission agrees that measures to reduce pesticide pollution of water in line with Article 11(3)(h) should be specific and included in the water framework directive (WFD) programmes of measures. 
41 Tredje strecksatsen Kommissionen instmmer i att tgrder som r inriktade p minskad anvndning av bekmpningsmedel enligt artikel 11.3 h br vara specifika och ing i frvaltningsplanernas tgrdsprogram.
It underlines that Directive 2009/128/EC on sustainable use of pesticides provides a wide flexibility to Member States to design the action plans. 
Kommissionen ppekar att medlemsstaterna enligt direktiv 2009/128/EG om hllbar anvndning av bekmpningsmedel ges stor flexibilitet i utformningen av tgrdsplanerna.
44 The Commission is aware of the coordination problems observed by the Court in the Member States. 
44 Kommissionen r medveten om de samordningsproblem som revisionsrtten uppmrksammat i medlemsstaterna.
The coordination between the authorities preparing and implementing operational programmes and rural development programmes and the authorities in charge of establishing river basin management plansу measures remains within the competence of Member States. 
Samordningen mellan de myndigheter som utarbetar och genomfr de operativa programmen och landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen och de myndigheter som ansvarar fr tgrderna inom ramen fr frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt r fortfarande medlemsstaternas behrighet.
It is the obligation of the Member States to set up partnerships with the competent authorities, partners and relevant representatives of civil society throughout the preparation and implementation of operational programmes and rural development programmes. 
Medlemsstaterna r skyldiga att inrtta partnerskap med behriga myndigheter, partner och relevanta fretrdare fr det civila samhllet under utarbetandet och genomfrandet av de operativa programmen och landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen.
In some cases the financial allocation for the 2007-2013 programming period was decided before the approval of the 2009 river basin management plans. 
I vissa fall beslutades det ekonomiska anslaget fr programperioden 2007Đ2013 innan 2009 rs frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt antogs.
These coordination problems have been addressed in the preparation of the operational programmes for the 2014-2020 programming period. 
Dessa samordningsproblem har tgrdats inom ramen fr utarbetandet av de operativa programmen fr programperioden 2014Đ2020.
In addition, the ex ante conditionality aims at aligning the investments with the river basin management plans. 
Syftet med frhandsvillkoren r dessutom att anpassa investeringarna till frvaltningsplanerna.
The Commission would also like to point out that in several audited Member States national funding sources are also used for investments in waste water treatment infrastructure, and that EU funding is not in itself expected or sized to reach compliance. 
Kommissionen vill ocks ppeka att i flera av de granskade medlemsstaterna anvndes nationella finansieringskllor ven fr investeringar i infrastruktur fr rening av avloppsvatten, och EU-finansieringen i sig varken frvntas eller r av lmplig storlek fr att uppn efterlevnad.
The Commission has identified gaps in establishing appropriate cost recovery provisions. 
Kommissionen har identifierat brister i faststllandet av lmpliga kostnadstckningsbestmmelser.
48 As a result of the 2013-2014 bilateral meetings, a list of action points for improvement was drawn up for each Member State in view of the adoption of the second river basin management plan in 2015. 
48 Till fljd av de bilaterala mtena 2013Đ2014 utarbetades en frteckning med tgrdspunkter fr frbttringar fr varje medlemsstat infr antagandet av den andra versionen av frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt 2015.
The recommendations set out for each Member State in the implementation report published in March 2015 reflect these agreed action points. 
Dessa verenskomna tgrdspunkter beaktades i rekommendationerna fr varje medlemsstat i den genomfranderapport som offentliggjordes i maj 2015.
(Commission Services Staff Working Document SWD(2015)50 final, see footnote 26 for full reference). 
(Kommissionens arbetsdokument SWD(2015)50 final, se fotnot 26 fr fullstndig hnvisning.)
49 In the cases where the relevant ex ante conditionality for the European Regional Development Fund and/ or the Cohesion Fund (ERDF/CF) was unfulfilled at the time of adoption of the operational programme, Member States have developed action plans for its fulfilment before the end of 2016. 
49 I de fall dr de relevanta frhandsvillkoren fr Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden (Eruf) och/eller Sammanhllningsfonden inte hade uppfyllts vid tidpunkten fr antagandet av de operativa programmen har medlemsstaterna tagit fram handlingsplaner fr att uppfylla frhandsvillkoren fre rsslutet 2016.
The action plan is an integral part of the operational programme, therefore its contractual enforceability is secured. 
Handlingsplanerna utgr en integrerad del av de operativa programmen, vilket innebr att deras bindande verkan r garanterad.
The Commission monitors the completion of action plans and may suspend the funds when the ex ante conditionality remains unfulfilled after 2016. However, the actions are only related to the criteria of fulfilment of the ex ante conditionality as defined by the regulation and cannot be used as a tool to enforce the compliance with all EU legislation. 
Kommissionen vervakar slutfrandet av handlingsplanerna och kan stlla in utbetalningarna om frhandsvillkoren inte r uppfyllda efter 2016. tgrderna rr dock endast de kriterier fr uppfyllande av frhandsvillkoren som faststlls i frordningen och kan drfr inte anvndas som verktyg fr att genomfra all EU-lagstiftning.
Reply of the Commission 73 The follow-up of actions as a result of the bilateral meetings is a separate process and not all of those actions can be taken into account in the operational programmes. 
Kommissionens svar 73 Uppfljningen av tgrder till fljd av de bilaterala mtena r en separat process, och alla dessa tgrder kan inte beaktas i de operativa programmen.
Common Commission reply to paragraphs 56 and 57 For the purposes of the urban waste water treatment directive, the Commission does not collect data on total population, but only on the тpopula-tion equivalentу (p.e.) in agglomerations of or above 2000 p.e. 
Kommissionens gemensamma svar p punkterna 56 och 57 Kommissionen samlar inte in uppgifter om total befolkning i samband med direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse, utan endast om ÓpersonekvivalenterÓ (pe) i ttorter med minst 2 000 pe.
The Commission notes that the percentages in Figure 3 are based on total population. 
Kommissionen konstaterar att procentandelarna i diagram 3 baseras p total befolkning.
The Commission considers that these do not reflect the legal compliance of agglomerations of or above 2 000 p.e. in a given Member State. 
Kommissionen anser inte att dessa procentandelar avspeglar regelefterlevnaden fr ttorter med minst 2 000 pe i en viss medlemsstat.
58 The Commission notes that the categories analysed by the Court in paragraph 58 do not necessarily relate to compliance obligations under the urban waste water treatment directive. 
58 Kommissionen konstaterar att de kategorier som analyseras av revisionsrtten i punkt 58 inte ndvndigtvis rr uppfyllandet av tvrvillkoren enligt direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse.
58 Second indent From a compliance point of view, the use of individual systems such as septic tanks is in line with the urban waste water treatment directive obligations, provided they achieve the same level of environmental protection. 
58 Andra strecksatsen Ur efterlevnadssynpunkt r anvndningen av individuella system som septiktankar frenlig med kraven i direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse, under frutsttning att samma mil-jskyddsniv uppns.
58 Third indent Agglomerations below 2000 p.e. are only covered by limited obligations under the urban waste water treatment directive я for example, there is no obligation to collect their waste waters. 
58 Tredje strecksatsen Ttorter med under 2 000 pe omfattas endast av begrnsade skyldigheter enligt direktivet. Det finns t.ex. inget krav p insamling av avloppsvatten frn dessa ttorter.
63 The Commission notes that it uses a specific methodology for the assessment of legal compliance of Member States3 that is based on agglomerations rather than on the total percentage of compliant load. 
63 Kommissionen ppekar att den anvnder en srskild metod fr bedmningen av medlemsstaternas regelefterlevnad3 som baseras p ttorter i stllet fr den totala procentandel av froreningsbelastningen som uppfyller kraven.
In order to try and reflect better the improvements and give a more realistic picture of the situation in Member States, the Commission is introducing the concept of тdistance to complianceу in the eighth urban waste water treatment directive implementation report. 
Fr att bttre avspegla frbttringarna och ge en mer realistisk bild av situationen i medlemsstaterna infrde kommissionen begreppet Óavstnd till efterlevnadÓ i den ttonde rapporten om genomfrandet av direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse.
64 According to the Accession Treaty only a small part of Hungary was considered as a sensitive area. 
64 Enligt anslutningsfrdraget frklarades endast en liten del av Ungern som knsligt omrde.
In addition, following Romaniaуs accession, Hungary committed to achieve for its entire territory the target of 75 % nutrient removal (N and P respectively), by 31 December 2018 according to the possibility offered under Article 9 of the urban waste water treatment directive. 
Efter Rumniens anslutning tog sig Ungern dessutom att uppn mlet att 75 % av nringsmnena ska avlgsnas fr hela territoriet (nitrater respektive fosfor) senast den 31 december 2018 enligt den mjlighet som ges i artikel 9 i direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse.
65 For the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary, the Commission has already launched pilot letters investigating cases of alleged non-compliance with the urban waste water treatment directive (for the Czech Republic) and with intermediate deadlines (for Slovakia and Hungary). 
65 Nr det gller Tjeckien, Slovakien och Ungern har kommissionen redan skickat preliminra skrivelser dr den utreder de pstdda fallen av bristande efterlevnad av direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse (fr Tjeckien) och med mellanliggande tidsfrister (fr Slovakien och Ungern).
Concerning the issue of financial sustainability, the Commission draws attention to its relevant replies to the Courtуs Special Report No 2/2015 of 28 January 2015 on the Danube river basin. 
Nr det gller finansiell hllbarhet hnvisar kommissionen till sina relevanta svar p revisionsrttens srskilda rapport 2/2015 av den 28 januari 2015 om avrinningsdistriktet Donau.
Produced by UBA in March 2012, revised in October 2014. 
Framtagen av UBA i mars 2012, reviderad i oktober 2014.
Reply of the Commission 74 69 The Commission believes that end-of-pipe solutions may not be the most cost-effective way of addressing the problem of micropollutants. Measures to reduce pollution at source need to be considered. 
Kommissionens svar 74 69 Kommissionen anser att lsningar i slutet av kedjan kanske inte r det kostnadseffektivaste sttet att hantera problemen med mikrofroreningar. tgrder fr att minska froreningar vid kllan br vervgas.
The implementation focus should be on properly assessing the extent of the problem (through good pressure and impact analysis and good monitoring networks) and then assessing the best (combination of) measures to achieve the objectives. 71 The Commission fully accepts the importance of ensuring compliance and of having appropriate systems to check it. 
Genomfrandet br inriktas p en lmplig bedmning av problemets omfattning (genom bra analyser av pverkan och effekter och bra vervaknings-ntverk) och drefter p en bedmning av de bsta (kombinerade) tgrderna fr att uppn mlen. 71 Kommissionen instmmer fullstndigt i att det r viktigt att garantera efterlevnad och ha lmpliga system fr att kontrollera detta.
This observation extends to all the pollution pressures referred to by the Court in its report. 
Denna iakttagelse rr alla froreningstryck som revisionsrtten hnvisar till i sin rapport.
The Commission also acknowledges the link between checks on compliance and the penalties used to deter detected non-compliance. 
Kommissionen bekrftar ocks kopplingen mellan efterlevnadskontroller och de avskrckande pfljder som tillmpas vid pvisad bristande efterlevnad.
The Commission aims to present during 2016 a general initiative on environmental compliance assurance across the EU. 
Kommissionen siktar p att lgga fram ett allmnt initiativ 2016 om hur efterlevnaden av miljlagstiftningen br skras inom EU.
84 As regards the indirect discharge of waste water by industrial installations, this would be subject to prior regulation and/or specific authorisation by the competent authority. 
84 Industrianlggningar som indirekt slpper ut sitt avloppsvatten omfattas av frhandsreglering och/ eller srskilda tillstnd frn den behriga myndigheten.
Pre-treatment must be applied in order to reach the objectives that are described in Annex IC to the urban waste water treatment directive. 
Frbehandling mste tillmpas fr att uppn mlen i bilaga IC till direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse.
90 See Commission reply to paragraph 84. 
90 Se kommissionens svar p punkt 84.
105 As regards Hungary, the Commission notes that rules concerning manure storage were already in place when the Commission took note of the transitional periods granted to farmers for constructing the required storage under the new action programme and the new nitrate vulnerable zones entered into force in 2012 and 2013, respectively. 
105 I frga om Ungern konstaterar kommissionen att reglerna fr gdsellagring redan var i kraft nr kommissionen noterade de vergngsperioder som jordbrukare beviljats fr att anlgga de lagringsutrymmen som krvs enligt det nya tgrdsprogram-met, och de nya nitratknsliga omrdena trdde i kraft 2012 respektive 2013.
108 While P limitations can help to achieve the objectives of the nitrates directive, it is to be noted that Member States are not required to provide P application standards under the nitrates directive itself. 
108 Begrnsningar av fosforhalten kan bidra till att uppn nitratdirektivets ml, men kommissionen ppekar att medlemsstaterna inte r skyldiga att ange tillmpningsnormer fr fosfor enligt nitratdirektivet.
However, under the WFD Member States are required to put in place measures to control diffuse sources of pollution and where phosphate from agriculture need to be addressed to allow good status to be reached. 
Enligt ramdirektivet fr vatten ska medlemsstaterna dock infra tgrder fr att kontrollera diffusa froreningskllor och ange nr fosfater frn jordbruket mste tgrdas fr att uppn god status.
This can be done either through the nitrates action programme or another mechanism. 
Detta kan antingen gras via tgrdsprogrammet fr nitrater eller via en annan mekanism.
109 The Commission underlines that the adequacy of the Czech action programme is being assessed within the context of the ongoing pilot. 
109 Kommissionen ppekar att lmpligheten av Tjeckiens tgrdsprogram fr nrvarande bedms inom ramen fr det pgende pilotfrfarandet.
Furthermore, the Czech action programme was amended in 2014 and the discussion in the context of the pilot has been involving the amendment and not only the version of the action programme dated 2012. 
Tjeckiens tgrdsprogram ndrades fr vrigt 2014 och diskussionerna i samband med pilotfrfarandet har ven omfattat ndringen, och inte bara 2012 rs version av tgrdsprogrammet.
115 The Commission notes that the figures refer to both eutrophic and hypertrophic waters and not only eutrophic. 
115 Kommissionen ppekar att siffrorna bde avser eutrofa och hypertrofiska vatten, och inte bara eutrofa vatten.
When assessing eutrophication it is also essential to bear in mind the river basin approach. For example, high levels of nitrates may not have an important impact on rivers but will cause eutrophication in the downstream coastal areas, as in the case of the Danube in the Black Sea. 
Det r ven viktigt att beakta de berrda avrin-ningsomrdena i bedmningen av eutrofiering. Hga nitratniver kanske inte pverkar floder i s stor utstrckning, men orsakar dremot eutrofiering i nedstrms kustomrden, vilket r fallet med Donau och Svarta havet.
117 The Commission underlines that cross-compliance is not a mechanism to enforce European environmental legislation. 
Kommissionens svar 75 117 Kommissionen ppekar att systemet med tvrvillkor inte r en mekanism fr att genomfra EU:s miljlagstiftning.
Cross-compliance links common agricultural policy (CAP) payments to the respect of certain rules while infringing such rules leads to reduced CAP payments. 
Genom tvrvillkoren kopplas GFP-utbetalningarna till efterlevnaden av vissa regler. vertrdelser av dessa regler leder till minskade GFP-utbetalningar.
Cross-compliance should in principle use existing control systems. 
Tvrvillkoren br i princip tillmpas med hjlp av befintliga kontrollsystem.
However, it should also ensure a minimum control rate when the control system of the sectoral legislation is not sufficiently effective. 
Det r dock ven viktigt att skerstlla en lgsta kontrollfrekvens om sektorslagstiftningens kontrollsystem inte r tillrckligt effektiva.
Only beneficiaries of such payments can be sanctioned while sectorial legislation and its enforcement mechanisms apply to all farmers, independently of the CAP. 
Bter kan endast utdmas fr mottagarna av sdana utbetalningar, medan sektorslagstiftningen och dess verkstllandemekanismer r tillmpliga p alla jordbrukare, oberoende av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
119 According to Article 96(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 тMember States may make use of their existing administration and control systems to ensure compliance with the rules on cross-complianceу. 
119 Fljande anges i artikel 96.1 i frordning (EU) nr 1306/2013: Medlemsstaterna fr anvnda sina befintliga administrations-och kontrollsystem fr att skerstlla att reglerna om tvrvillkor fljs.
123 The directive provides Member States with wide flexibility to design the national action plans. 
123 Enligt direktivet har medlemsstaterna stor flexibilitet att utforma sina nationella tgrdsplaner.
124 Second indent The Commission notes that the directive does not require this level of detail in the national action plans. 
124 Andra strecksatsen Kommissionen konstaterar att denna detaljniv inte krvs fr de nationella tgrdsplanerna enligt direktivet.
130 The Commission agrees that the general principles of integrated pest management laid down in Annex III to Directive 2009/128/EC do not set a clear legal basis to identify possible infringements. 
130 Kommissionen instmmer i att de allmnna principer fr integrerat vxtskydd som faststlls i bilaga III till direktiv 2009/128/EG inte ger en tydlig rttslig grund fr att identifiera eventuella vertrdelser.
Exceptions are both the obligation of record keeping and the requirement to be able to justify an intervention with pesticides based on monitoring or related technical advice. 
Undantagen gller bde dokumentationskravet och kravet att insatser med bekmpningsmedel ska motiveras baserat p vervakning eller relaterade tekniska rd.
No other elements have been clearly defined in the directive due to the subsidiarity principle and to the variety of agro-climatic conditions that have to be considered. 
P grund av subsidiaritetsprincipen och de mnga olika klimatfrhllanden som mste beaktas har inga andra faktorer definierats tydligt i direktivet.
Reply of the Commission 76 The content of minimum requirements for fertilisers and pesticides should reflect, as minimum, the provision of Annex I, point 8(9), to Regulation (EU) No 808/2014. 
Kommissionens svar 76 Minimikraven fr gdselmedel och bekmpningsmedel ska minst omfatta bestmmelsen i punkt 8.9 i bilaga I till frordning (EU) nr 808/2014.
138 See Commission replies to paragraph 117 and 119. 
138 Se kommissionens svar p punkterna 117 och 119.
Common reply to 139 and 140 While the legislation indeed sets a minimum control rate of 1 %, the probability for certain farmers to be subject to a cross-compliance check may be higher than 1 % since several other factors intervene: я The specific method of sampling applied; я The sectorial legislation determines a different control rate (e.g. 3 % for animal ID); я In case of a significant degree of non-compliance with an act or standard, the number of on-the-spot checks shall be increased; я Instances of non-compliance identified by other sources (e.eg. sectorial controls) are to be cross-re-ported and followed up by the competent authority; я Farmers for whom an infringement was identified have to be given a special weighting in the risk assessment. 
Gemensamt svar p punkterna 139 och 140 Lgsta kontrollfrekvens enligt lagstiftningen r mycket riktigt 1 %, men sannolikheten att vissa jordbrukare omfattas av kontroller av tvrvillkor kan vara hgre n 1 % eftersom flera andra faktorer spelar in: Ń Den urvalsmetod som anvnds. Ń Om en annan kontrollfrekvens faststlls i sektorslagstiftningen (t.ex. 3 % fr djur-identifiering).
141 Second indent See Commission reply to paragraph 134. 
141 Andra strecksatsen Se kommissionens svar p punkt 134.
142 While it is true that the annual cross-compliance campaign cannot be adapted to all types of requirements, findings from other sources are also to be followed up under cross-compliance (e.g. cross-reporting). 
142 Det r sant att de rliga kontrollerna av tvrvillkoren inte kan anpassas till alla typer av krav, men resultat frn andra kllor ska ocks fljas upp inom ramen fr tvrvillkoren (t.ex. dubbelrapportering).
Furthermore, the legislation requires that each beneficiary selected for an on-the-spot check shall be checked at a time when most of the requirements and standards for which he or she was selected may be checked4. 
Enligt lagstiftningen ska varje bidragsmottagare som valts ut fr en kontroll p plats kontrolleras vid ett tillflle nr s mnga av de krav och normer fr vilka urvalet gjorts kan kontrolleras4.
Moreover, the on-the-spot checks shall, as a general rule, be carried out as part of one visit and they shall consist of a verification of the requirements and standards which may be checked at the time of the visit5 depending on the cycle of nature. 
Kontroller p plats ska dessutom generellt utfras inom ramen fr ett enda kontrollbesk dr man granskar efterlevnaden av de krav och normer som kan kontrolleras vid tidpunkten fr besket5, beroende p ssong.