natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission encouraged Member States to put in place IT project management systems and databases to compile information for use with indicators. 
Kommissionen har uppmanat medlemsstaterna att datorisera frvaltningen av projekten och skapa databaser fr att samla information om indikatorerna.
As part of the simplification drive, the Commission called on Member States to simplify and reduce the number of their impact indicators. 
Som ett led i frenklingsarbetet har kommissionen uppmanat medlemsstaterna att frenkla och begrnsa antalet resultatindikatorer.
The Commission considers that added value is greater if CIPs contribute to creating cross-border economic centres rather than simply resolving problems still existing at borders. 
Kommissionen anser att man kan uppn en kad mervr-deseffekt om programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativet medverkar till att bygga upp grnsverskridande ekonomiska center, i stllet fr att enbart lsa grnsrelaterade problem.
The choice of this approach affects the possibility of laying down standard indicators, even if improvements are possible in this field. 
Valet av denna strategi gr det lttare att faststlla standardindikatorer, ven om det fortfarande finns utrymme fr frbttringar p detta omrde.
X. The Commission will present the guidelines and methodology documents well before the next programming period gets under way. 
X. Kommissionen kommer att presentera riktlinjer och metodbeskrivningar i god tid innan nsta programperiod startar.
It is working on the legal cooperation instruments. 
Den arbetar fr nrvarande p samarbetets rttsliga instrument.
INTRODUCTION 4. (a) The Commission would point out that the recommendation made in 4(a) has been taken into account in the guidelines for Interreg III. It would refer to the CourtŐs observations at 7(b). 
INLEDNING 4. a) Kommissionen understryker att det i riktlinjerna fr Interreg III har tagits hnsyn till rekommendationen i punkt 4 a och hnvisar till revisionsrttens konstaterande i punkt 7 b.
THE COMMISSION GUIDELINES 12. 
KOMMISSIONENS RIKTLINJER 12.
The Commission shares the CourtŐs view that it is important that guidelines are adopted before the preparation of programmes starts. 
Kommissionen r enig med revisionsrtten om att det r viktigt att riktlinjerna antas innan programfrberedelserna brjar.
On the question of making available the guidelines for Interreg III, the Commission would refer to its reply to paragraph 28. 
Vad angr tidpunkten nr riktlinjerna fr Interreg III var tillgngliga hnvisar kommissionen till sitt svar p punkt 28.
On the question of specific operational and measurable objectives and targeted measures, it would refer to its replies in paragraphs 17 to 25. 
Betrffande frgan om srskilda, operationella och mtbara ml samt riktade tgrder hnvisar kommissionen till sina svar p punkterna 17Đ25.
15. (b) Cross-border institutions had been involved in Interreg programmes in some regions. However, the different national legal situations meant that the Commission could not prescribe cooperation structures and the guidelines therefore limited themselves to requiring joint governing bodies. 
15. b) Grnsverskridande institutioner deltog i Interreg-program i vissa regioner, men p grund av att det rder olika rttsliga frhllanden i medlemsstaterna kunde kommissionen inte faststlla samarbetsstrukturer. Riktlinjerna freskriver drfr endast gemensamma frvaltningssystem.
C 303/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 16. 
C 303/30 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 7.12.2004 16.
In its guidelines the Commission gives European economic interest groupings (EEIGs) as one of the avenues to be explored; this was done in a number of programmes but the results were rather disappointing, as is stated in paragraph 44. 
I sina riktlinjer nmner kommissionen Europeiska ekonomiska intressegrupperingar (EEIG) som en av de mjligheter som br utforskas, vilket man ocks har gjort i en rad program, men med tmligen nedslende resultat (se punkt 44).
The Final Report on the ex post evaluation of Interreg II published in December 2003 has since confirmed that the EEIG instrument is not geared towards cooperation between public law based authorities and that it is very time and resource consuming to set up and created practical difficulties in operation. 
I slutrapporten om efterhandsutvrderingen av Interreg II som offentliggjordes i december 2003 bekrftas att EEIG inte r ett lmpligt instrument fr samarbetet mellan offentligrttsliga myndigheter och att skapandet av ett sdant samarbete skulle vara mycket tids-och resurskrvande och svrt att frvalta i praktiken.
On completion of the work carried out in the wake of the study on legal cooperation instruments, the Commission envisaged, in the proposals contained in the third report on economic and social cohesion, creating a legal instrument to facilitate the management of cooperation programmes. (a) Some of the most important benefits of Interreg are not quantifiable. 
Som avslutning p arbetet om samarbetets rttsliga instrument vervger kommissionen som ett av frslagen i den tredje rapporten om ekonomisk och social samhrighet att skapa ett rttsligt instrument, som kan gra det lttare att frvalta samarbetsprogrammen. a) Vissa av de strsta vinsterna med Interreg r inte kvantifierbara.
One of the main ones is to create, often for the first time, a context where cooperation between individuals, public and private institutions and enterprises across borders can take place. 
En av de allra strsta vinsterna r att det, ofta fr frsta gngen ngonsin, skapas en ram fr samarbete mellan medborgare och offentliga och privata institutioner och fretag ver grnserna.
The greater the intangible content of projects, the greater the difficulty of developing indicators. 
Ju abstraktare projektens innehll r desto svrare r det att faststlla indikatorer.
The Commission has concentrated on developing indicators to measure the concrete results of cross-border and transnational cooperation in particular programmes. 
Kommissionen har inriktat sig p att ta fram indikatorer som mter de konkreta resultaten av grnsverskridande och transnationellt samarbete inom vissa program.
The current sets of indicators in individual Interreg III programmes represent a start in this direction. (b) Despite the inherent difficulty of quantifying effects that are largely intangible, the Commission aimed in its documents to give examples of indicators that could be used in practice. 
De indikatorer som faststllts fr enskilda Interreg III-program r emellertid en lovande inledning p arbetet. b) Trots svrigheterna med att kvantifiera resultat som till strsta delen r abstrakta frskte kommissionen i sitt dokument att ge exempel p i praktiken anvndbara indikatorer.
In the light of the experience gained in using the indicators, the Commission recognises that there is room for improvement in the guidance on indicators. (c) The Commission was aware of the needs in terms of interregional cooperation (strand C). 
Mot bakgrund av de erfarenheter som gjorts instmmer kommissionen i att det finns behov av att frbttra riktlinjerna fr indikatorerna. c) Kommissionen knde till behoven vad angr interregionalt samarbete (del C).
Over the period 1994 to 1999, it had organised five calls for proposals which had attracted over 1 500 applications each representing a number of partners. 
Under perioden 1994Đ1999 organiserade kommissionen sledes fem inbjudningar att lmna frslag och fick svar frn 1 500 anbudsgivare, som representerade en rad olika partner.
In response to these calls it financed and monitored some 150 cooperation projects. 
Resultatet av dessa inbjudningar blev cirka 150 samarbetsprojekt som finansierades och fljdes upp av kommissionen.
The Commission would emphasise the usefulness of this type of cooperation in an enlarged, 25-member Union with many bodies and authorities conducting policies or managing regional development measures. 
Kommissionen vill understryka hur anvndbar denna form av samarbete r i en union med 25 medlemsstater, dr politik och tgrder fr regionalutveckling frvaltas av ett stort antal olika organisationer och myndigheter.
The Commission adopted the approach of a basket of options from which the Member States could choose because of the diversity of situations in the regions. 
Kommissionen valde att ge medlemsstaterna ett antal valmjligheter med tanke p att frhllandena r s mngskiftande i de olika regionerna.
Both in the guidelines and during the negotiations the Member States were recommended, inter alia, because of the limited funds available, to focus the actions in each programme on certain prioritised measures deriving from the socio-economic analysis of the situation in the regions concerned. 
Bde i riktlinjerna och i frhandlingarna rekommenderades medlemsstaterna, delvis p grund av att de disponibla medlen r begrnsade, att inrikta insatserna inom varje program p vissa prioriterade tgrder som faststllts p grundval av en socioekonomisk analys av situationen i de aktuella regionerna.
Only NUTS III areas along the border could be included. Such regions may be disadvantaged in comparison with the average of the NUTS II regions to which they belong. 
Endast NUTS III-omrden lngs grnser kunde ing, d sdana regioner kan vara missgynnade i frhllande till genomsnittet av de NUTS II-regioner som de tillhr.
For example the NUTS III areas on the Bavarian-Czech border face a different socio-economic situation than the average of the NUTS II areas of Niederbayern or Oberpfalz, which are close to the 2001 EU15 average. 
Exempelvis skiljer sig den socioekonomiska situationen i grnsregionen BayernĐTjeckien frn genomsnittet fr NUTS II-omrdena Niederbayern och Oberpfalz, som ligger nra EU-15-genomsnittet frn 2001.
The Commission wanted to leave the decentralised public authorities the choice of areas in which they wished to cooperate to improve their development policies and instruments. 
Kommissionens syfte var att lta de decentraliserade myndigheterna bestmma vilka omrden de nskar samarbeta p fr att frbttra sin politik och sina instrument fr utveckling.
This allows steering committees to select the projects best suited to the regional development and cohesion objectives. 
P s stt kan styrkommitterna vlja ut de projekt som bst uppfyller mlen regional utveckling och sammanhllning.
17. (a) Cross-border programmes have similar objectives to those of traditional Structural Fund programmes, but with the specific feature set out in point 9 of the guidelines, namely the development of cross-border economic and social centres. 
17. a) De grnsverskridande programmen har i stort sett samma ml som de traditionella strukturfondsprogrammen, bortsett frn det srskilda ml som omnmns i riktlinjernas punkt 9, nmligen Óatt upprtta grnsverskridande ekonomiska och sociala centerÓ.
This can only be achieved by developing as many links as possible between neighbouring socio-economic fabrics which, because of borders, have no links. 
Detta ml kan bara uppns genom att man skapar s mnga frbindelser som mjligt mellan socioekonomiska grann-strukturer som p grund av nationella grnser inte r sammanfltade.
The fundamental problem for border areas is the limited exchanges between actors on the two sides of the border. 
Det grundlggande problemet fr grnsregionerna r nmligen att det frekommer ett s litet utbyte mellan de aktrer som befinner sig p olika sidor av samma grns.
The intangible nature of a great many Interreg operations make it difficult to quantify the impact. 
Mnga av Interreg-tgrderna r av immateriell karaktr och det r drfr svrt att kvantifiera deras effekt.
The Commission would refer to its remarks in paragraph 21(a). (b) The Commission believes that the analyses at its disposal 18. were adequate for defining the general objectives in the guidelines. 
Kommissionen hnvisar till sina kommentarer till punkt 21 a. b) Kommissionen anser att den hade tillgng till de analy-18. ser som behvdes fr att faststlla de allmnna mlen i riktlinjerna.
It is, however, the situation in a particular border region that should determine the specific types of action that need to be covered by a programme. 
Valet av insatser br emellertid gras p grundval av den specifika situationen i en grnsregion.
The definition of the concrete objectives and priorities for the programmes by the Member StatesŐ authorities on the bases of the Interreg guidelines is in line with the principle of subsidiarity. 
Medlemsstaterna har faststllt konkreta ml och prioriteringar fr programmen i enlighet med riktlinjerna fr Interreg och men hnsyn tagen till subsidiaritetsprincipen.
Given the diverse situations the Commission preferred not to set common indicators ex ante; instead it suggested examples of indicators to Member States. 
Eftersom det handlar om mycket olikartade situationer har kommissionen inte velat faststlla gemensamma indikatorer i frhand utan har i stllet gett medlemsstaterna exempel p olika indikatorer.
Defining indicators is a process which must be carried out on an ongoing basis and in partnership between the Commission, the management authorities and the monitoring and steering committees. 
Fr att vara relevanta mste indikatorerna faststllas steg fr steg och i samarbete mellan kommissionen, frvaltningsmyndigheter och vervaknings-och styrkommitter.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/31 25. 
7.12.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 303/31 25.
In concentrating operations, preference is given to projects with a heavy cooperation content, whatever the area, for the reasons explained in paragraphs 17 and 22 for cross-border projects and 24 for interregional projects. 
Nr insatserna koncentreras lggs vikten p projekt med hg samarbetsniv, oavsett omrde, av de skl som anges i punkterna 17 och 22 fr grnsverskridande projekt, och i punkt 25 fr interregionala.
Sectoral concentration is appropriate in regions which have marked sectoral problems but not for a territory confronted with the general problem of weak socio-economic links because of the border. 
En sektorspecifik koncentration r lmplig i regioner med uttalade sektorspecifika problem, men inte i ett omrde som mter de allmnna problemen med ett svagt socioekonomiskt ntverk p grund av grnsen.
The Commission was concerned not to complicate programme management, as any definition of areas not based on NUTS III would make analyses and the organisation of partnership more difficult and would also lead to disputes about the geographical eligibility of projects. 
Kommissionen strvade efter att inte gra programfrvaltningen alltfr komplicerad, eftersom andra definitioner n de som gller fr NUTS III-omrdena skulle ha gjort det svrare att genomfra analyser och organisera partnerskapet.
The Commission discussed drafts of the guidelines with the Committee for the Development and Conversion of Regions on 30 November and 13 and 20 December 1999. 
Kommissionen diskuterade utkastet till riktlinjer med Kommittn fr utveckling och omstllning av regioner den 30 november 1999 och den 13 och 20 december 1999.
Before the formal approval of the guidelines the Commission services were also in regular contact with the regions and gave advice on the drafting of programmes. 
Innan riktlinjerna godkndes formellt hade kommissionen regelbundna kontakter med regionerna och gav rd fr programutarbetandet.
Drafts of the specific guidance on ex ante evaluation and indicators for Interreg III were available to Member States in the Technical Group on Evaluation as early as November 1999. 
Utkast till de specifika riktlinjerna fr frhandsutvrdering och indikatorer fr Interreg III fanns tillgngliga fr medlemsstaterna i den tekniska utvrderingsgruppen redan i november 1999.
As stated in paragraph 28 the content of the guidelines was known well before they were finally published. 
Som anges i punkt 28 var riktlinjerna knda lngt innan de slutligen offentliggjordes.
The Commission does not therefore believe that the date of publication affected the quality of the proposals. 
Drfr tror kommissionen inte att datum fr offentliggrandet kan ha pverkat programfrslagens kvalitet.
THE COMMISSIONŐS PROCEDURE FOR EXAMINING CIP PROPOSALS 32. 
KOMMISSIONENS F RFARANDE F R ATT GRANSKA F RSLAG TILL PROGRAM F R GEMENSKAPSINITIATIVET 32.
The second phase of the examination of proposals involved inter-service consultations and culminated in a position paper. 
I den andra fasen av genomgngen av frslagen hlls samrd inom kommissionen och ett stndpunktsdokument utarbetades.
This was drawn up in accordance with internal instructions intended to ensure that the programmes were of good quality. 
Stndpunktsdokumentet utarbetades i enlighet med interna instruktioner vars syfte r att skra att programmen r av god kvalitet.
It served as a basis for negotiations with the Member StatesŐ authorities. 
Dokumentet lg till grund fr frhandlingarna med medlemsstaternas myndigheter.
All the comments made during the inter-service consultation and all correspondence with the Member States were filed in the computer system and in hard copy. 
De kommentarer som gjordes under samrdet inom kommissionen och all korrespondens med medlemsstaterna lagrades i datasystemet och i pappersform.
The Commission had to find a balanced solution in partnership with the Member States. (a) The first version of the Spain-Portugal CIP provided only for the creation of secretariats working separately just for the subprogrammes. 
Kommissionen var tvungen att finna en vlavvgd lsning i samarbete med medlemsstaterna. a) I den frsta versionen av gemenskapsinitiativet SpanienĐPortugal var det meningen att det bara skulle skapas separata sekretariat p delprogramsniv.
The corrected version of the programme, which was judged admissible, added the creation of a genuine JTS for support for the overall management of the programme (in the managing authority) and of the subprogrammes as regards operations coming under the responsibility of the central authorities of the two countries. 
Enligt den ndrade versionen av programmet, som ansgs mjlig att anta, skulle det ocks skapas ett egentligt gemensamt tekniskt sekretariat till std fr den samlade frvaltningen av programmet (vid frvalt-ningsmyndigheten) och delprogrammen fr de interventioner, som de centrala myndigheterna har ansvar fr i de tv lnderna.
In order not to delay programme start-up, the Commission accepted this proposal which it felt was not ideal but was an improvement. 
Fr att inte frsena programstarten accepterade kommissionen detta frslag, som den inte ansg vara idealiskt, men nd ett framsteg.
Subsequently the Commission took a number of steps to ask for the position of the JTS to be improved. (b) The Spain-Portugal programme proposal was found inadmissible after the check of the first proposal of 18 December 2000. 
Kommissionen har drefter flera gnger tagit initiativ till att begra en frbttring av det gemensamma sekretariatets situation. b) Programfrslaget SpanienĐPortugal ansgs omjligt att godknna efter genomgng av det frsta frslaget den 18 december 2000.
The proposal was found admissible on 14 February 2001 after additional documentation had been supplied. 
Efter det att kompletterande dokumentation hade lmnats ansgs frslaget mjligt att godknna den 14 februari 2001.
The comments of the coordination unit on the admissibility of the MEDOC programme were of a qualitative nature and could not be used to justify declaring the programme proposal inadmissible. 
Samordningsenhetens kommentarer angende mjligheterna att godknna Mdoc-programmet avsg kvalitetsaspekter och kunde inte anvndas fr att frklara programfrslaget omjligt att godknna.
The comments were of a type to be considered in the context of the position paper. 
Kommentarer var av ett sdant slag att de skulle kunna tas upp i stndpunktsdokumentet.
The Commission considers that the internal instructions were adequate to ensure a consistent and transparent treatment of the programmes, while allowing the necessary flexibility to deal with the wide variety of programme areas and of quality in the programme proposals. 
Kommissionen anser att de interna instruktionerna var tillrckliga fr att skra enhetlighet och ppenhet i bedmningen av programmen och ven den flexibilitet som krvs fr hanteringen av de mnga olika programomrdena och kvalitetsaspekter i programfrslagen.
It also considers that the Member States received adequate instructions for drafting proposals (see reply to paragraph 28). 
Kommissionen anser ocks att medlemsstaterna ftt tillrckliga instruktioner fr utarbetandet av frslag (se svaret angende punkt 28).
Further instructions would have run counter to the principle of subsidiarity and to the need to keep rules as simple as possible. 
Mer detaljerade instruktioner strider mot subsidiaritetsprincipen och behovet av s enkla regler som mjligt.
The exceeding of the time limit for the approval of programmes was largely due to delays in programme authoritiesŐ revision of their proposals, which first had to be agreed with their partners (see the CourtŐs observation in paragraph 37(c)). Within the Commission, too, it was a considerable challenge to process a large volume of dossiers at the same time, with nearly half of the programme proposals arriving within the space of a few weeks around the deadline for submission. 
Tidsfristerna verskreds huvudsakligen p grund av frseningar i programmyndigheternas versyn av frslagen, d verenskommelser med partnerna mste ns frst (se revisionsrttens anmrkningar i punkt 37 c). ven inom kommissionen visade sig handlggningen av ett s stort antal renden vara en stor utmaning, srskilt med tanke p att nstan hlften av alla frslag inkom under ett par veckor fre tidsfristens utgng.
As stated in its reply to paragraph 19 of Special Report No 7/2003 (see FN 19), the Commission believes that the regulation time limits were not very realistic, particularly for Interreg. 
Som sades i svaret p punkt 19 i den srskilda rapporten nr 7/2003 (se FN 19), anser kommissionen inte att de faststllda tidsfristerna var srskilt realistiska, srskilt inte fr Interreg.
37 (c) The Commission would refer to its reply to paragraph 36. 
37. c) Kommissionen hnvisar till svaret p punkt 36.
The Commission has announced that programme complements will be dropped for the next programming period. 
Kommissionen har meddelat att programkomplementen kommer att slopas i och med nsta programperiod.
C 303/32 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 39. 
C 303/32 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 7.12.2004 39.
Many actors were still occupied with projects under the old Interreg II programmes, which could be implemented until the end of 2001. 
Mnga aktrer var fortfarande engagerade i de gamla Interreg II-programmen, som pgick fram till slutet av 2001.
This reduced in practice the potential for new projects under the new programmes and therefore also reduced the effect of the delay in the publication of the guidelines and in the approval of programmes. 
Detta innebar i praktiken frsmrade frutsttningar fr nya projekt inom ramen fr de nya programmen, samt att det frsenade offentliggrandet av riktlinjerna och frseningarna i programgod-knnandet inte fick s omfattande effekter.
The Commission would also refer to its communication of 20 September 2002 (COM(2002) 528) on the evolution of budget execution of the Structural Funds, in particular outstanding commitments (RAL). 
Kommissionen hnvisar ocks till sitt meddelande av den 20 september 2002 (KOM(2002) 528) om budgetgenomfrandet under strukturfonderna, srskilt de utestende tagandena (R. A. L.).