natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These sectors were indeed involved from the earliest reflections on the Strand A CIPs, albeit belatedly in one case (Spain-Portugal). 
Dessa sektorer involverades faktiskt redan vid de frsta diskussionerna om programmen inom del A, men sent i ett fall (SpanienĐPortugal).
Consultation on the Strand B CIPs involving a large number of Member States was entered into only partially or not at all because of the already very complex nature of the preparation process. 
Nr det gller programmen inom del B, dr ett stort antal medlemsstater medverkar, frekom samrd endast delvis eller inte alls p grund av att frberedelsearbetet redan var s komplext.
In the case of Strand C, the CIPs were jointly prepared by the Commission and the competent secretariats. 
Fr del C utarbetades programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativ gemensamt av kommissionen och de sekretariat som ansvarar fr dessa program.
Meanwhile, since the Ôbottom-upŐ design process is not followed by choices aimed at identifying priorities for action, it delivers very broad intervention programmes that are characterised by heterogeneous measures and result in the dilution of the available resources (see paragraphs 59 to 63). 
Eftersom tillvgagngssttet att utarbeta program nerifrn och upp inte tfljs av val som klargr vilka de prioriterade omrdena r utmynnar det i ett mycket omfattande stdprogram med olikartade tgrder och detta leder till att tillgngliga resurser urvattnas (se punkterna 59Đ63).
C 303/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 Do the Member States cooperate on the implementation of CIPs? 
C 303/12 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 7.12.2004 Samarbetar medlemsstaterna vid genomfrandet av programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativet?
The main changes affecting the third generation of Interreg programmes (see paragraph 7) include the establishment of shared managing authorities, paying authorities, monitoring committees, financial plans and bank accounts into which ERDF aid is to be paid, as well as the constitution of JTSs and steering committees. 
Ngra av de viktigaste frndringarna i den tredje generationens Interreg-program (se punkt 7) r att det inrttas en enda frvaltningsmyndighet, utbetalande myndighet och vervak-ningskommitt, ett enda bankkonto p vilket ERUF-stdet skall sttas in och en enda finansieringsplan samt att det inrttas ett gemensamt tekniskt sekretariat och en styrkommitt.
A single managing authority and a single paying authority were designated for each programme. 
Inom varje program utsgs en enda frvaltningsmyndighet och en enda utbetalande myndighet.
Attempts to establish EEIGs as agents for the implementation of Interreg programmes were unsuccessful (Alps and north-west Europe), despite Commission encouragement (see paragraph 16). 
Frsken att bilda europeiska ekonomiska grupperingar (EEIG) som aktrer fr genomfrandet av Interreg-programmen lyckades inte (Alperna och Nordvstra Europa) trots att kommissionen uppmuntrade dem (se punkt 16).
The different models used for the constitution of JTSs were sometimes far removed from the spirit of the guidelines, which is also to promote cooperation between the bodies implementing CIPs. However, the Commission accepted the different models because it was concerned above all that the programmes be adopted without further exacerbating the delays: (a) the most successful model is that of a JTS set up in a single location and consisting of representatives of each of the Member States concerned, usually with offices in some or all of the Member States. 
De gemensamma tekniska sekretariaten bildades utifrn olika modeller som ibland lg lngt frn andan i riktlinjerna som ocks syftar till att uppmuntra samarbetet mellan de organ som genomfr programmen. nd godknde kommissionen dem, frmst fr att kunna anta programmen utan ytterligare frseningar: a) Den mest lyckade modellen r det tekniska sekretariat som upprttats p en enda plats och som bestr av personer frn de olika berrda medlemsstaterna, vanligtvis med lokalkontor i vissa eller alla medlemsstater.
In the best case examined (Ems-Dollart Region), the JTS is part of an organisation for trans-European cooperation that was set up by the Member States. 
Det mest framgngsrika sekretariatet r en del av ett organ fr transeuropeiskt samarbete som medlemsstaterna har inrttat (region Ems-Dollart).
In another case (north-west Europe), it is part of an undertaking unconnected with the implementation of the CIP but nonetheless retains a trans-European character. 
I ett annat fall r det en del av ett fretag som inte medverkar i genomfrandet av programmet, men som nd har en transeuropeisk karaktr (Nordvstra Europa).
In one final case (Alps), while legally a part of the managing authority, it is located separately and has representatives from the different regions of the Member States; (b) a model that reflects the spirit of the guidelines less well is that of a JTS that is physically part of the managing authority but has no representatives from the other Member States, although these are approached for consultation (Ireland-Wales and Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein); (c) a final model (Spain-Portugal) is even further removed from the spirit of the guidelines. This model consists of no more than offices under the aegis of the regional authorities on both sides of the border. 
I ett sista fall r det tekniska sekretariatet juridiskt en del av frvaltningsmyndigheten, ven om det fysiskt ligger utanfr den, och fretrds av olika regioner i medlemsstaterna (Alperna). b) En modell som i mindre grad speglar andan i riktlinjerna r det gemensamma tekniska sekretariat som rent fysiskt r en del av frvaltningsmyndigheten, men som inte har ngra fretrdare frn de vriga medlemsstaterna, ven om dessa nd har konsulteras (IrlandĐWales och AlpenrheinĐ BodenseeĐHochrhein). c) I ett sista fall ligger modellen nnu lngre frn andan i riktlinjerna (SpanienĐPortugal): det bestr endast av lokalkontor som ingr i de regionala frvaltningarna p bda sidor om grnsen.
They are often situated outside the eligible area, which itself extends a good distance from the border. 
De ligger ofta utanfr det stdberttigade omrdet som dessutom strcker sig lngt frn grnsen.
Each of the programmes examined operates a single bank account for the receipt of Community funds. 
Inom samtliga program som granskats anvnds ett enda bankkonto till gemenskapsmedel.
Each of the CIPs examined also has a single financial plan, i.e. a plan that does not indicate the share of each Member State. 
Samtliga program som granskats har ocks en enda finansieringsplan, det vill sga en plan dr frdelningen per medlemsstat inte anges.
On occasion, however, a breakdown of the plan by Member State is attached to the programme complement, the content of which has been verified by the Commission (Alps), or the CIP indicates each Member StateŐs share in ERDF aid (Spain-Portugal and Western Mediterranean). 
Men det hnder att denna plan presenteras per medlemsstat som bilaga till programkomplementet vars innehll har granskats av kommissionen (Alperna) eller att det i varje program anges varje medlemsstats del i frga om ERUF-std (Spa-nienĐPortugal, Vstra Medelhavsomrdet).
In one instance, moreover (Spain-Portugal), promotional material on the CIP refers exclusively to the share of one of the two Member States. 
I ett fall hnvisar man dessutom i reklammaterialet fr programmet endast till en av de tv medlemsstaternas del (SpanienĐPortugal).
None the less, an attentive eye is generally kept on the utilisation of the appropriations that each Member State brings to the CIP financial plan. 
Man tittar dock i allmnhet p hur de anslag som varje medlemsstat har bidragit med till programmets finansieringsplan har utnyttjats.
Indeed, the single financial plan for each CIP is drawn up on the basis of, on the one hand, the distribution of ERDF resources by Member State and type of intervention (1) and, on the other hand, the way each Member State distributes these resources among the Interreg programmes, according to its own priorities. 
Den samlade finansieringsplanen fr varje program utarbetas  ena sidan p grundval av hur de medel som har tilldelats ERUF frdelas per medlemsstat och per tgrdstyp (1) och  andra sidan p grundval av hur varje medlemsstat frdelar dessa medel bland Interreg-programmen utifrn sina prioriteringar.
Finally, the guidelines recommend that aid contracts be concluded with a single beneficiary having the status of project leader, which must then agree its rights and obligations vis--vis its trans-European partners in the project in question. 
Slutligen frordas det i riktlinjerna att stdkontrakten skall tecknas med en enda stdmottagare som har projektledar-status och som sedan mste komma verens om sina rttigheter och skyldigheter med sina transeuropeiska partner i det aktuella projektet.
This principle was observed in each of the programmes examined, the one exception being where each aid proposal was signed by all the project partners (Ireland-Wales). 
Denna princip fljdes i alla program som granskats med undantag av ett fall dr varje frslag till std undertecknades av samtliga samarbetspartner i projekten (IrlandĐWales).
There remain some obstacles to cooperation between all the partners involved in the CIPs that were examined. 
Det finns fortfarande hinder fr samarbetet mellan alla parter som berrs av de program som granskats.
These obstacles relate to legal questions and the allocation to the CI of ERDF funding. None the less, the Interreg III guidelines made it possible to strengthen cooperation between all partners, although the level of commitment to cooperation varies from one CIP to another. 
Riktlinjerna fr Interreg III har dock gjort det mjligt att strka samarbetet mellan alla parter ven om deras medverkan i samarbetet vxlar beroende p program. VERENSSTMMER GRUNDANALYSEN OCH VAL AV TGRDER OCH MERVRDET I DE F RSTA PROJEKT SOM ANTAGITS?
This process seeks to base the choice of measures for which beneficiariesŐ projects are eligible on an analysis of the regional situation. 
Denna process skall motivera val av tgrder fr vilka stdmottagarnas projekt r stdberttigade och bygga p en analys av situationen i omrdet.
Both analysis and planning must take account of the opinion of an assessor appointed by the Member States. 
Bde i analysen och i utarbetandet av programmet fr gemenskapsinitiativet skall man beakta yttrandet frn en bedmare som medlemsstaterna har valt ut.
The success of the CI is largely dependent on the consistency of this process, namely, on the appropriateness of the measures to the problems diagnosed. 
Hur framgngsrikt gemenskapsinitiativet blir beror till stor del p hur samstmd denna process r och i detta fall p hur vl tgrderna stmmer verens med de diagnostiserade problemen.
It is not enough to qualify as trans-European: projects must also contribute to the resolution of border-related problems. 
Projekten br ven bidra till att lsa de problem som beror p grnserna och inte enbart ha en transeuropeisk karaktr.
(1) This distribution was agreed at the meeting of Heads of State and Government in Berlin on 24 and 25 March 1999. 
(1) Denna frdelning blev freml fr ett beslut under stats-och regeringschefernas sammantrde i Berlin den 24 och 25 mars 1999.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/13 Is the ex ante evaluation used in the drafting of programmes? 
7.12.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 303/13 r frhandsbedmningen till hjlp nr programmen utarbetas?
The ex ante assessors often made a significant contribution to the preparation and drafting of CIPs. 
Frhandsbedmarna lmnade ofta ett vsentligt bidrag nr programmen fr gemenskapsinitiativet utarbetades och utformades.
The documents produced under the heading Ôex ante evaluationŐ are composed, as a rule, of texts which have already been incorporated in their entirety into the CIPs, and of notes explaining the content of those texts. 
De dokument som framstlldes, den s kallade frhandsbedmningen, utgjordes ofta av texter som redan i sin helhet ingick i programmen och av avsnitt som skulle motivera innehllet i dem.
Consequently, the ex ante assessors usually did not comment critically on the programme proposals that were submitted to the Commission, and to which they had contributed. 
Fljden blev att frhandsbedmarna i allmnhet inte uttalade sig kritiskt om de programfrslag som lades fram fr kommissionen och dr de hade medverkat i utarbetandet.
However, in one case (Europe), a number of fundamental criticisms were formulated, observing, for example, that the CIPŐs objective was too broad and that it would be beneficial to define a single, clear and unambiguous objective. 
I ett fall (Nordvstra Europa) framfrdes dock grundlggande kritik, till exempel att mlet fr programmet var alltfr omfattande och att det vore bttre om man formulerade ett enda klart och tydligt ml.
Yet it was where the assessor was not involved in preparation of the CIP (Ireland-Wales) that he raised the most important questions: the usefulness of multiple analyses, the weakness of the link between the analysis and the definition of priorities and measures, and the poor identification of border-related problems and potential. 
Men det var dock frst i det fall d bedmaren inte hade ngonting att gra med utarbetandet av programmet (IrlandĐWales) som de viktigaste frgorna lyftes fram: nyttan av flera olika analyser, den svaga kopplingen mellan analys och prioriteringar och tgrder samt ocks brister nr grnsrelaterade problem och mjligheter skall identifieras.
The lack of objective criticism during the drafting stage of CIP proposals, the general nature of the CI objectives, the lack of specific information on each eligible area (see paragraphs 17 to 25) and the failure to establish detailed qualitative criteria in advance (see paragraph 34) all combined to form an obstacle to the preparation of quality CIPs. 
Bristen p objektiv kritik under utarbetandet av programfrslagen kombinerat med den allmnna karaktren i gemenskapsinitiativets ml och bristen p information om varje stdberttigat omrde (se punkterna 17Đ25) samt avsaknaden av detaljerade kvalitetskriterier som faststllts p frhand (se punkt 34) utgjorde hinder fr att program av hg kvalitet skulle kunna utarbetas.
When the Interreg III programmes were being prepared, only the mid-term evaluations for the previous period were available. 
Nr Interreg III-programmen utarbetades fanns bara utvrderingarna efter halva tiden tillgngliga frn den fregende perioden.
The content of these evaluations, in terms of recommendations for the new period, varies greatly. 
Innehllet i dem vad gller rekommendationer infr den nya perioden varierar kraftigt.
There are numerous difficulties in obtaining harmonised and up-to-date statistics: the absence of statistics in one or other of the Member States, statistics submitted on different dates or according to different criteria, and poor data reliability owing to the small geographical divisions encountered at Strand A level. (a) (b) the lack of clarity of the strategy and priorities laid down for the programmes (see paragraphs 58 to 63); the need to define indicators which would enable a programmeŐs impact to be measured; in spite of efforts in this respect (see paragraph 21), the resulting proposals remain inadequate (see paragraphs 73 to 77). 
De mest markanta aspekterna som bedmarna konstaterade och som inte tycks ha beaktats i tillrcklig utstrckning r fljande: svrt att f fram harmoniserad och aktuell statistik: det saknades statistik i en eller annan medlemsstat, statistiken lmnades in vid olika datum eller sammanstlldes utifrn olika definitioner, och indelningen i mindre geografiska omrden fr del A var inte tillfrlitlig. 56.
Interregional 56. two (a) (b) 57. lines to provide a clear identification of needs (see paragraph 24) is echoed in the CIPs under this strand, which refer to no analysis in any form. 
57. Nr det gller del C visar sig avsaknaden av klart och tydligt identifierade behov i kommissionens riktlinjer (se punkt 24) ocks i programmen inom denna del som inte innehller ngon som helst analys.
It is therefore difficult to specify the objectives of these programmes and determine a method for measuring the progress to be achieved. 
Drfr r det svrt att faststlla ml fr dessa program och hitta ett stt att mta de framsteg som grs.
Can the problems addressed be attributed to the existence of a border? 
Beror de problem som konstaterats p det faktum att det finns grnser?
The descriptions present development-related problems, in the same way as traditional ERDF intervention programmes, but do not usually focus on the problems created by the existence of borders, such as missing links (1). 
I beskrivningarna tar man upp problem som har att gra med utvecklingen, p samma stt som i ett traditionellt ERUF-stdprogram, och de r inte inriktade p de problem som grnserna medfr i sin egenskap av Ófelande lnkarÓ (1).
However: (a) in some areas, borders appear to impede efforts to attain development objectives. 
Men: a) p vissa omrden kan grnserna utgra ett hinder nr det gller att n vissa utvecklingsml.
This is true in particular of environmental problems on one side of a border that also impact on the opposite side (water quality, fire prevention, reafforestation, joint action in protected zones, natural hazards, etc.); (b) some programmes include an assessment of cross-border cooperation and of the advantages which this can bring in specific sectors, such as the labour market, transport and communications, science and health (Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein and Ems-Dollart Region). 
Det gller frmst miljproblem som nr de uppstr p ena sidan av grnsen ocks pverkar den andra sidan (vattenkvalitet, brandbekmpning, terbeskogning, gemensamma tgrder i skyddsomrden, naturrisker m.m.), b) vissa program innehller en bedmning av det grnsverskridande samarbetet och av de frdelar detta kan medfra inom vissa srskilda sektorer som arbetsmarknaden, transporter och kommunikationer, vetenskap och hlsa (AlpenrheinĐBo-denseeĐHochrhein och region Ems-Dollart).
Another programme (Spain-Portugal) highlights the advantage of cooperation in certain fields, in the cross-border area, such as railway connections, spatial management, rivers and water resources; (1) This expression is used on page 7 of the CommissionŐs ÔWorking paper 6 (5 May 2000) Ń ex ante evaluation and indicators for Interreg (Strand A)Ő. 
I ett annat program (SpanienĐPortugal) frklaras frdelarna med ett samarbete p vissa omrden som jrnvgskommunikationer och markfrvaltning, floder och vattenresurser i det grnsverskridande omrdet, (1) Uttrycket anvnds i kommissionens arbetsdokument nr 6 (5 maj 2000), ÓEx ante evaluation and indicators for Interreg (del A)Ó, s. 7.
The missing link refers to the barrier effect of a border. As examples, the Commission quotes the lack of border crossings, river pollution and lack of mutual recognition of qualifications. 
Kommissionen ger som exempel avsaknad av grnsverskridande frbindelser, grnsverskridande flodfrorening och avsaknad av msesidigt erknnande av kvalifikationer. a) b) Strategin och de prioriteringar som faststllts fr programmen (se punkterna 58Đ63) r otydliga.
C 303/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 7.12.2004 (c) one Strand B programme in particular (Europe) demonstrates the transnational significance of a series of new themes linked to spatial development (ESDP). These include the development and complementarity of alternative modes of transport, coordination in the management of regional rivers, reafforestation, measures to increase complementarity between urban areas, the development of transport from the regionŐs peripheral areas and the coordination of measures to prevent pollution of the English Channel. 
C 303/14 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 7.12.2004 c) ett program inom del B (Nordvstra Europa) visar den transnationella betydelsen hos en rad nya teman som har att gra med den regionala utvecklingen (ESDP, Regional utvecklingsplanering i europeiskt perspektiv), till exempel utveckling av alternativa transportmedel och komplettering av dem, samordning av frvaltningen av stora floder i omrdet, terplan-tering av skog, utveckling av kompletterande insatser mellan stderna, utveckling av transportmedel frn perifera platser i omrdet, samordning av tgrder mot froreningen av Engelska kanalen m.m.
Most of the Strand A programmes were drawn up using the Ôbottom-upŐ approach advocated in the Commission guidelines: potential partners in a CI were invited to propose areas in which projects could be implemented. 
De flesta programmen inom del A utarbetades p grundval av det tillvgagngsstt nerifrn och upp som kommissionen fresprkar i sina riktlinjer: olika partner som eventuellt var intresserade av gemenskapsinitiativet inbjds att inkomma med frslag nr det gllde omrden dr projekt kunde genomfras.
These proposals were used to determine CIP measures and, subsequently, priorities, without any choices being made. 
Frslagen anvndes fr att faststlla tgrder och sedan prioriteringar fr programmen utan att det gjordes ngra val.
There was rather a tendency to establish very broad programmes so that as many partners as possible could then be involved in implementation. 
Man ville snarare skapa mycket omfattande program fr att s mnga som mjligt skulle kunna delta i genomfrandet av dem.
Sometimes the Member States concerned agreed on measures before analysing the regional situation (Ems-Dollart Region and Spain-Portugal). 
Ibland kom de berrda medlemsstaterna verens om tgrder innan det hade gjorts en analys av situationen i omrdet (region Ems-Dollart och SpanienĐPortugal).
Similar criticisms were voiced of the evaluations of previous periods and, here, by certain ex ante assessors (see paragraphs 52 and 53). 
Liknande konstateranden framfrdes i utvrderingarna frn fregende perioder och av vissa frhandsbedmare (se punkterna 52 och 53).
For example all the Strand A programmes examined included measures in the economic, social, rural development, human resources, environment, cultural heritage and tourism sectors. 
I alla program som granskats inom del A finns det drfr tgrder p det ekonomiska och sociala omrdet, omrdet fr landsbygdsutveckling, personalfrgor, milj, kulturarv och turism.
This explains why these CIPs are no different from traditional intervention programmes, save as regards the specific implementing rules attached to the Initiative (see paragraphs 43 to 49). 
Detta frklarar varfr dessa program fr gemenskapsinitiativet inte skiljer sig frn de traditionella stdprogrammen frutom nr det gller initiativets srskilda genomfrandebestmmelser (se punkterna 43Đ49).
In one case where the Commission found the measures to be too broad in scope (Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein), one priority was cancelled, only for the measures under this priority to be transferred to the remaining priorities. 
I ett fall dr kommissionen ansg att tgrderna hade fr stor spridning (AlpenrheinĐBodenseeĐHochrhein) strks en prioritering, men tgrderna enligt denna frdes ver till de terstende prioriteringarna.