natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is not clear from the files which of the other factors referred to in paragraph 11 are taken into account when setting the refund rate, or how this is done. 
Det framgr inte av dokumentationen vilka av faktorerna i punkt 11 som skall tas i beaktande nr bidragssatserna bestms eller hur detta grs.
There are no explanations for differences between the calculated theoretical rate and the rate actually proposed. 
Det finns inga frklaringar fr skillnader mellan den berknade teoretiska nivn och den niv som faktiskt fresls.
According to the CommissionŐs analyses of indicative price data for the period covered by this audit, for the most part, the refund rates set were within the limit of the CommissionŐs estimates of the difference between EU and world prices. 
Enligt kommissionens analys av vgledande prisdata fr den period som tcks av denna granskning lg mestadels de bidragssatser som faststllts inom grnserna fr kommissionens uppskattningar av skillnaden mellan EU-priserna och vrldsmarknadspriserna.
However, there were a significant number of occasions when, for certain products, these estimates indicated that the EU price, after deducting refunds, was lower than the world price. 
Vid mnga tillfllen visade dessa uppskattningar emellertid att EU-priset sedan bidragen dragits bort var lgre n vrldsmarknadspriset fr vissa produkter.
The Commission justifies this by reference to conditions in the third-country markets concerned. 
Kommissionen berttigar detta genom att referera till villkoren p de marknader i tredje land som berrs.
For example: (a) during the period 14 February to 21 May 2001, the theoretical EU price net of refunds for SMP varied between 17 and 143 euro per tonne below the world price; Illustration 2 Comparison of theoretical EU and world prices for SMP (b) the theoretical EU price net of refunds for WMP remained below the world price from 28 March to 12 July 2001 by between 22 and 240 euro per tonne. 
Till exempel: a) Under perioden den 14 februari till 21 maj 2001 varierade det teoretiska EU-priset exklusive bidrag fr skummjlkspulver mellan 17 och 143 euro per ton under vrldsmarknadspriset. Illustration 2 Jmfrelse mellan det teoretiska EU-priset och vrldsmarknadspriserna fr skummjlkspulver b) Det teoretiska EU-priset exklusive bidrag fr helmjlkspulver lg under vrldsmarknadspriset frn den 28 mars till den 12 juli 2001 med mellan 22 och 240 euro per ton.
(1) USA Dairy News. 
(1) USA Dairy News.
5.9.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 211/9 Illustration 3 Comparison of theoretical EU and world prices for WMP 28. 
5.9.2003 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 211/9 Illustration 3 Jmfrelse mellan det teoretiska EU-priset och vrldsmarknadspriserna fr helmjlkspulver 28.
The practical usefulness of many of the detailed calculations is thus questionable. 
Den praktiska nyttan av mnga av de detaljerade berkningarna kan sledes ifrgasttas.
None of the original and fewer than half of the corrected theoretical rates were used and subsequent changes in butter and SMP rates have not been reflected in the cheese rates. 
Ingen av de ursprungliga bidragssatserna och mindre n hlften av de korrigerade teoretiska bidragssatserna anvndes och senare ndringar av bidragssatserna fr smr och skummjlkspulver har inte pverkat bidragssatsen fr export av ost.
REFUND RATES SET BY TENDER Cereals Characteristics of the market 29. 
EXPORTBIDRAG SOM FASTSTLLS GENOM ANBUDSF RFARANDE Spannml Beskrivning av marknaden 29.
The largest grain exchange for common wheat is in Chi-cago, USA. 
Den strsta rvarubrsen fr vete finns i Chicago, USA.
Prices quoted on this exchange are considered to be the most representative (world) prices. 
De priser som noteras p denna anses vara de mest representativa (vrldsmarknads)priserna.
Prices are quoted in general for futures (contracts to be fulfilled at a certain time in future). 
Priserna anges i allmnhet som termins-priser (kontrakt som skall fullgras vid en viss framtida tidpunkt).
Common wheat exists in a variety of qualities (and thus prices), from high-quality breadmaking wheat to low-quality feed wheat. 
Det finns mnga olika kvaliteter av vete (och drmed priser), frn matbrdsvete av hg kvalitet till fodervete av lg kvalitet.
There is no worldwide or even European classification system for wheat; each country has its own system, so wheat from different origins is not directly comparable. 
Det finns inget gemensamt vrldsomspnnande klassificeringssystem fr vete, inte ens ngot som r gemensamt fr Europa. Varje land har sitt eget system och drfr kan vete med olika ursprung inte jmfras direkt.
Setting of the refund rate 30. 
Faststllande av exportbidraget 30.
For wheat a maximum refund rate is set on the basis of a tender. The arrangements for setting the rate are obscure in a number of respects: The method for setting refund rates for cheese is complicated, inconsistently applied and has not been updated 27. 
Fr vete faststlls en maximal exportbidragssats med utgngspunkt i ett anbudsfrfarande. Frfarandena vid faststllandet av bidragssatsen r oklara p flera punkter. Metoden fr att faststlla exportbidraget fr ost r komplicerad, tillmpas inkonsekvent och r inaktuell 27.
There is no coherent link between the rates set and market prices. In 1997 the Commission calculated the theoretical export refund rates for most cheeses on the basis of the equivalent quantities of milkfat and SMP used in their manufacture and the rates in force for those products at the time. 
Det finns ingen logisk koppling mellan de faststllda bidragssatserna och marknadspriserna. r 1997 berknade kommissionen de teoretiska exportbidragssatserna fr de flesta ostar p grundval av motsvarande kvantitet mjlkfett och skummjlkspulver som anvnts vid tillverkningen av dem och de bidragssatser som d gllde fr dessa produkter.
The most important pilot cheese used for this calculation was Edam and the theoretical rates for most other cheeses were derived from the Edam calculation. 
Den viktigaste osten som p frsk anvndes fr denna berkning var Edamer och de teoretiska bidragssatserna fr de flesta andra ostar utgick frn Edamer-berkningen.
However, as the resulting theoretical rate for Edam was considered too high in comparison with the existing rate, the existing rate was maintained but the proportions of that rate derived from the fat (butter) and dry-matter (SMP) contents were calculated. 
Eftersom berkningen emellertid gav en teoretisk bidragssats fr Edamer som ansgs vara fr hg i jmfrelse med den gllande bidragssatsen behll man den sistnmnda, och berknade fettets (smr) och torrsubstansens (skummjlkspulver) andelar av bidraget.
Theoretical rates for all other cheeses were then derived from this corrected calculation for Edam. 
Sedan berknades teoretiska bidragssatser fr alla andra ostar utifrn denna korrigerade berkning fr Edamer.
However these theoretical rates were not consistently adopted. 
Dessa teoretiska bidragssatser anvndes emellertid inte generellt.
In some instances the calculated rate was adopted, in others the existing rate, and for some cheeses the rate was increased by bonuses of 10 %, 15 % or 20 %. 
I vissa fall anvndes den berknade bidragssatsen, i andra den gllande bidragssatsen och fr vissa ostar kades bidragssatsen med en bonus p 10 %, 15 % eller 20 %.
These bonuses were eliminated in 1998. 
Dessa bonuspslag togs bort 1998.
C 211/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.9.2003 Illustration 4 Difference between normal and ACP refund (euro per tonne) (a) common wheat exists in a range of qualities, whose relative prices can be expected to reflect differences in quality and demand. 
C 211/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 5.9.2003 Illustration 4 Skillnad mellan vanligt exportbidrag och exportbidrag fr AVS-lnderna (euro per ton) a) Det finns mnga olika vetekvaliteter, vilkas relativa priser kan frvntas terspegla skillnader i kvalitet och efterfrgan.
The refund is in principle calculated on the difference between EU internal prices for the French Ôtout venantŐ category and the nearest equivalent non-EU wheat, American Soft Red Winter 2 (SRW2). 
Exportbidraget berknas i princip p skillnaden mellan priset p EU:s inre marknad fr den franska kategorin Ótout venantÓ och den nrmaste motsvarigheten utanfr EU, American Soft Red Winter 2 (SRW2).
On five of six occasions audited, however, the Commission maintains that higher qualities of wheat than Ôtout venantŐ were used because on these occasions they were closer in quality to SRW2; (b) the Commission asserts that exports to African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries normally involve high-quality wheat. 
I fem av sex granskade fall hvdar emellertid kommissionen att bttre kvaliteter n Ótout venantÓ anvndes, eftersom de vid dessa tillfllen kvalitetsmssigt var mer jmfrbara med SRW2. b) Kommissionen uppger att exporten till lnder i Afrika, Vstindien och Stilla Havet (AVS-lnderna) vanligtvis utgrs av vete av hg kvalitet.
To calculate the refund rates the Commission compares the price of high-quality (breadmaking) EU wheat to compare with US SRW2, instead of using an equivalent breadmaking quality on the world market. 
Fr att berkna exportbidragssatserna jmfr kommissionen priset p vete av hg kvalitet frn EU (matbrdsvete) med priset p amerikanska SRW2, istllet fr med matbrdsvete av motsvarande kvalitet p vrldsmarknaden.
The result is a higher refund rate. Over 80 % of wheat to ACP countries is exported from France. 
Detta leder till hgre exportbidragssats. ver 80 % av vetet till AVS-lnderna exporteras frn Frankrike.
In two of the five ACP rates examined, for which tenders of 19 000 tonnes were accepted, the rate fixed exceeded even the calculated difference between the world prices for US SRW2 wheat and EU prices for French breadmaking wheat. 
I frga om tv av de fem granskade bidragssatserna fr export till AVS-lnderna, varvid anbud p 19 000 ton godkndes, versteg bidraget ven den berknade skillnaden mellan vrldsmarknadspriserna p det amerikanska vetet SRW2 och EU-priserna p franskt matbrdsvete.
Given the origin of these exports, there must be some doubts as to whether they are in fact of the quality assumed by the Commission; (c) until the 2001 harvest, refunds on common wheat to ACP countries benefited from a flat rate supplement varying between 0,02 and 7,63 euro per tonne in the different market years covered by this examination; (d) the CommissionŐs calculations are based on the ÔspotŐ free on board (fob) price (the price of a contract to be fulfilled on the day of the setting of the refund), not on the future price. 
Med tanke p det exporterade vetets ursprung, freligger visst tvivel om huruvida det verkligen r av den kvalitet kommissionen antagit. c) Till och med skrden r 2001 utgick fr export av vete till AVS-lnderna ett schablontillgg p mellan 0,02 och 7,63 euro per ton under de olika regleringsr som omfattades av underskningen. d) Kommissionens berkningar utgr frn spotpriset fritt ombord (fob) (priset fr ett kontrakt som skall fullgras samma dag som exportbidraget faststlls) och inte frn ngot terminspris.
The world and the EU prices used in the calculation of the theoretical refund are the averages, for the day in question, of prices communicated by the trade, producer organisations, etc. However, the relationship between the calculations performed and the final rate set is not clear. 
De vrldsmarknads-och EU-priser som anvnds vid berkningen av det teoretiska bidraget r genomsnittliga priser som meddelats fr dagen ifrga av handeln, producentorganisationer etc. Sambandet mellan berkningarna och den bidragssats som slutligen faststlls r emellertid inte klart.
Illustration 5 Comparison of the difference in price between EU wheats and US SRW 31. of the year by increments designed to compensate for storage costs and to encourage the traders to export grain left at the end of the harvest year. 
Illustration 5 Skillnad mellan EU-vete och amerikanskt SRW-vete 31. vissa mnader fr att kompensera lagringskostnader och fr att uppmuntra handlarna att exportera verbliven spannml i slutet av skrderet.
Since the Commission has already determined the fob prices both for the world market and the internal market, and the export refund is defined as the difference between these two prices, the addition of the monthly increment appears to be unjustified. 
Eftersom kommissionen redan har faststllt fob-priserna bde p vrldsmarknaden och den inre marknaden, och exportbidraget definieras som skillnaden mellan dessa tv priser, frefaller det mnadsvisa tillgget omotiverat.
Sugar Characteristics of the market 32. 
Socker Beskrivning av marknaden 32.
The sugar market is managed, among other instruments, by the use of a production quota, which, combined with a preferential import quota for sugar from the ACP countries, is responsible for a substantial oversupply of the internal market (1). This surplus (created by the production of white sugar within the quota and from ACP imports) is exported with the aid of export refunds. 
Sockermarknaden styrs bland annat genom produktionskvoter som, tillsammans med kvoter fr frmnsimport av socker frn AVS-lnderna, r anledningen till att det finns ett betydande verskott p den inre marknaden (1). verskottet (som uppsttt genom produktion av vitsocker inom ramen fr kvoten och import frn AVS-lnderna) exporteras med hjlp av exportbidrag.
(1) See also Special Report No 20/2000 concerning the management of the common organisation of the market in sugar (OJ C 50, 15.2.2001). 
All (1) Se ven Srskild rapport nr 20/2000 om frvaltningen av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr socker (EGT C50, 15.2.2001).
5.9.2003 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 211/11 Any Community production over and above the production quota (so called ÔCŐ sugar) has to be exported without the benefit of export refunds. 
5.9.2003 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 211/11 produktion inom gemenskapen som verstiger produktionskvo-ten (s kallat C-socker) mste exporteras utan exportbidrag.
The major product, in this group, exported from the EU is white (refined) sugar. 
Den viktigaste produkten i denna grupp som exporteras frn EU r vitsocker (raffinerat socker).
Setting of the refund rate 33. 
Faststllande av exportbidraget 33.
The sugar market differs from the other three product markets in that it is heavily controlled by the CMO. 
Sockermarknaden skiljer sig frn de tre andra produkt-marknaderna p s stt att den i hg grad kontrolleras av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden.
The figures used for these elements have not changed in the past years, so the internal price factor in the calculation is more or less fixed and is public knowledge. 
Siffrorna som anvnds fr berkningen av schablonbeloppet har inte ndrats de senaste ren, s den inre prisfaktorn i berkningen r mer eller mindre konstant och den r ocks allmnt knd.
For the world market price the quotation on the LIFFE is taken. Contrary to the cereals sector, which is based on the spot price (price of the day), the price retained for sugar is that for future quotations. 
Som vrldsmarknadspris anvnds noteringen p termins-och optionsmarknaden i London (London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange, LIFFE). I motsats till spannmlssektorn dr spotpriset (dagspriset) anvnds, anvnder man terminspriset fr socker.
In the past a fixed amount of 0,02 euro was deducted from the difference between these two prices to arrive at the maximum refund to be accepted under the tendering procedures in order to avoid overshooting the price differential. 
Tidigare gjordes avdrag med ett fast belopp p 0,02 euro frn skillnaden mellan dessa tv priser fr att f fram det maximala exportbidrag som godkndes i anbudsfrfarandena.
Nowadays the amount of the reduction varies, but only within a small band-width. 
Numera varierar avdragsbeloppet, men bara inom ett litet intervall.
Given that the method and elements of the procedure to set the maximum refund are public knowledge and that the sugar market is dominated by a very small number of large companies, the tendering system, designed to set export refunds in the most economical way for the Community budget, does not function as a real tendering system in the sense that traders are in meaningful competition with each other. 
Anbudsfrfarandet har utformats fr att faststlla exportbidragen s att de r mest ekonomiska fr gemenskapens budget, men eftersom bde metoden och de faktorer som ingr i berkningen fr att faststlla det maximala exportbidraget r allmnt knda och sockermarknaden domineras av ett ftal stora fretag, fungerar det inte som ett verkligt anbudsfrfarande dr handlarna agerar i meningsfull konkurrens med varandra.
A rate set directly by the Commission would not differ significantly from that set by the tendering system, which is more cumbersome. 
En exportbidragssats som faststlldes direkt av kommissionen skulle inte i ngon betydande utstrckning skilja sig frn den som faststlls genom anbudsfrfarandet, som r mer omstndligt.
Another factor preventing the tendering system from functioning properly is the intervention price which provides a floor for tenders. 
En annan faktor som hindrar anbudsfrfarandet frn att fungera korrekt r att interventionspriset utgr ett golv fr anbuden.
The Commission should consider carrying out a cost/benefit analysis of the option of fixing the rate directly or by tendering. 
Kommissionen borde vervga att utfra en kostnad/nytto-analys av alternativen att faststlla nivn direkt eller genom anbudsfrfarande.
For the samples audited the accepted refunds were in the range of 40 to 50 euro per 100 kg, which is about double the level of the world price. 
I de stickprov som granskades lg de godknda bidragen p mellan 40Đ50 euro per 100 kg, vilket r ungefr dubbelt s hgt som vrldsmarknadspriset.
ÔCŐ sugar has to be exported without the benefit of export refunds, so it would be expected that the production of this type of (over quota) sugar would be small. 
C-socker mste exporteras utan bidrag, s drfr kunde man vnta sig en liten produktion av detta slag av socker (utver kvoten).
Over the past years, however, the production of ÔCŐ sugar has varied between 11 % and 21 % of quota production, which equals in some years the quantity of sugar that is exported with the aid of export refund. 
Under de senaste ren har emellertid produktionen av C-socker varierat mellan 11 % och 21 % av produktionen inom kvoterna, vilket under vissa r motsvarat den kvantitet socker som exporterats med hjlp av exportbidrag.
This calls into question the substantial level of the aid granted to the export of quota sugar, bearing in mind that export refunds should only be granted to the extent necessary to enable the product to be exported(1). 
Drmed kan de omfattande bidrag som ges till export av socker som producerats inom kvoterna ifrgasttas, eftersom exportbidrag ju endast skall ges i den utstrckning detta r ndvndigt fr att produkten skall kunna exporteras (1).
In the 2000 EAGGF year refunds on sugar amounted to some 1 400 million euro. 
Under EUGFJ-ret 2000 uppgick exportbidragen fr socker till cirka 1 400 miljoner euro.
(1) Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2038/1999 of 13 September 1999 (OJ L 252, 25.9.1999, p. 1). 
(1) Rdets frordning (EG) nr 2038/1999 av den 13 september 1999 (EGT L 252, 25.9.1999, s. 1), artikel 18.
C 211/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.9.2003 CONCLUSIONS 39. 
C 211/12 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 5.9.2003 SLUTSATSER 39.
The market organisation regulations for the various product groups (1) stipulate that different products may benefit from an export refund aid based upon the difference in price of the product on the internal EU market and the world market, to the extent necessary to enable them to be exported. 
Frordningarna om organisationen av marknaden fr olika produktgrupper (1) anger att olika produkter kan f exportbidrag som grundas p skillnaden i pris p produkten mellan den inre EU-marknaden och vrldsmarknadspriset i den utstrckning detta r ndvndigt fr att de skall kunna exporteras.
Factors to be taken into account when setting the refund within this limit are the price difference, stability on the internal market, WTO constraints, future market trends and the economic aspect of the exports. 
Faktorer som skall tas hnsyn till nr bidraget bestms inom denna grns r prisskillnaden, stabiliteten p den inre marknaden, WTO:s begrnsningar, tendenserna p terminsmarknaderna och exportens ekonomiska aspekter.
The Commission estimates the difference between EU and world prices for milk products, cereals and sugar on the basis of indicative prices or quotations. 
Kommissionen uppskattar skillnaden mellan EU-priserna och vrldsmarknadspriserna fr mjlkprodukter, spannml och socker p grundval av vgledande priser eller noteringar.
It does not do so for beef products because it maintains that there are no world prices. 
Detta sker inte fr ntkttsprodukter eftersom den hvdar att det inte finns ngra vrldsmarknadspriser fr dessa.
For the most part, the CommissionŐs calculations indicate that the gap is not exceeded by the refund. 
I de flesta fallen visar kommissionens berkningar att bidraget inte verstiger denna skillnad.
However, for significant periods covered by the audit, the CommissionŐs estimates show that the minimum EU price net of refund is below the world price for certain milk products. While the Commission disposes of most of the information necessary, some of it is incomplete and/or not up to date (see paragraphs 14 to 18) and the use of that information cannot be systematically linked to calculations of proposed rates (see paragraphs 1, 18 and 25). 
Emellertid visar kommissionens uppskattningar att minimi-EU-priset exklusive bidrag ligger under vrldsmarknadspriset fr vissa mjlkprodukter under betydande perioder som omfattas av granskningen. ven om kommissionen i stort sett har tillgng till ndvndig information, r den till viss del ofullstndig eller inaktuell (se punkterna 14Đ18) och det gr inte att hitta ngot systematiskt samband mellan anvndningen av informationen och berkningarna av de freslagna bidragssatserna (se punkterna 1, 18 och 25).
There are no guidelines on rate-setting procedures (see paragraphs 20 and 23). 
Det finns inte heller ngra riktlinjer fr hur bidragssatserna skall faststllas (se punkterna 20 och 23).
There is no coordination between the responsible market divisions and no evidence of recent management analysis of the reasons for variations in practice between market divisions (see paragraph 13). 
Det finns ingen samordning mellan de ansvariga marknadsavdelningarna och inget belgg fr att ledningen nyligen gjort ngon analys av orsakerna till att marknadsavdelningarnas praxis r s olika (se punkt 13).
The Commission states that it carries out management checks. There is, however, no systematic written evidence of such. 
Kommissionen sger att den utfr ledningskontroller men det finns inga systematiska skriftliga bevis fr detta.
The overall conclusion therefore remains the same as in the CourtŐs last report on this subject, that there is still a lack of demonstrable coherence in the rate-setting procedures for milk products, beef and to a lesser extent cereals. 
Den vergripande slutsatsen frblir drfr densamma som i revisionsrttens senaste rapport i mnet, nmligen att frfarandena fr faststllande av exportbidragssatser fr mjlkprodukter, ntktt och i viss mn fr spannml fortfarande prglas av bristande konsekvens.
However, subsequent to this audit, in its Annual Activity Report for DG AGRI of 1 May 2002, the Commission accepted that there was a need to This Report was adopted by the Court of Auditors strengthen internal controls over the quality of parameters for setting refund rates. 
Till fljd av denna granskning godtog kommissionen emellertid i sin rliga verksamhetsrapport fr GD Jordbruk av den 1 maj 2002 att man behver frstrka den interna kontrollen av kvaliteten p de parametrar som anvnds vid faststllandet av exportbidragssatser.