natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The current EU framework on migrant integration is built upon three main documents: - The 'Common Basic Principles for Integration Policy' (paragraph 7), developed by the Council in 2004, recalled by the European Parliament in 201315 and reaffirmed by the Council in 201416, are the foundations for EU policy cooperation on the integration of migrants and comprise 11 non-binding principles against which Member States can assess their own efforts (see Figure 5). - The Commission’s 'European agenda for the integration of third-country nationals'17 from 2011 highlights the challenges of migrant integration and suggests areas for action by both the Commission and Member States to foster integration policies. - The Commission’s 'Action plan on the integration of third-country nationals' from June 2016 provides a comprehensive framework to support Member States' efforts in developing and strengthening their integration policies18. 
EU:s nuvarande ram fr integrationen av migranter bygger p tre huvuddokument: - De gemensamma grundprinciperna fr integrationspolitiken (punkt 7) som utarbetades av rdet 2004, som Europaparlamentet pminde om 201315 och rdet bekrftade 201416, utgr underlaget till EU:s politiska samarbete om integrationen av migranter och bestr av elva icke-bindande principer mot vilka medlemsstaterna kan bedma sina egna anstrngningar (se figur 5). - I kommissionens meddelande Europeisk agenda fr integration av tredjelandsmedborgare17 frn 2011 uppmrksammas utmaningarna vid integration av migranter och ges frslag p tgrdsomrden dr bde kommissionen och medlemsstaterna kan agera fr att frmja integrationspolitiken. - Kommissionens handlingsplan fr integration av tredjelandsmedborgare frn juni 2016 bildar en samlad ram fr std till medlemsstaternas anstrngningar att vidareutveckla och strka sin integrationspolitik18.
In addition, the EU has made efforts to promote the exchange of information and the sharing of best practices by creating European networks such as the EIN, by cultivating EU cooperation and by making information on the topic available in a standardised way (e.g. integration handbooks19, a European website on integration20, and a common set of indicators: the 'Zaragoza indicators' – see paragraph 43). 
EU har dessutom frskt underltta informationsutbyte och spridning av bsta praxis genom att inrtta europeiska ntverk ssom det europeiska integrationsntverket, uppmuntra EU-samarbete och tillhandahlla information om mnet p ett standardiserat stt (t.ex. handbcker om integration19, en europeisk webbplats om integration20 och en uppsttning gemensamma indikatorer Đ Zaragoza-indikatorerna Đ se punkt 43).
Annex IV provides a timeline of the initiatives and tools developed. 
I bilaga IV finns en tidslinje med de initiativ och verktyg som har tagits fram.
These tools help Member States to assess, develop, monitor and evaluate their national frameworks on integration. 
Verktygen hjlper medlemsstaterna att bedma, utveckla, vervaka och utvrdera sina nationella ramar fr integration.
EU migration policy has an impact on national integration policies 18. 
EU:s migrationspolitik pverkar medlemsstaternas nationella migrationspolitik 18.
In the light of the common EU migration policy, as set out in the Treaty (paragraph 15), the EU has been developing common migration and visa rules for migrants (see Annex V for the legislation in question). 
Mot bakgrund av EU:s gemensamma migrationspolitik, som anges i frdraget (punkt 15), har EU utarbetat gemensamma migrations-och viseringsregler fr migranter (se bilaga V fr den aktuella lagstiftningen).
In March 2018, two sets of EU directives distinguish between migrants that move through recognised, authorised channels (legal migration); and migrants that apply for protection either at EU borders (asylum) or from countries outside the EU 13 
I tv uppsttningar EU-direktiv frn mars 2018 grs skillnad mellan migranter som kommer genom erknda och godknda kanaler (laglig migration) och migranter som ansker om skydd antingen vid EU:s grnser (asyl) eller frn lnder utanfr EU (vidarebosttning).
The result is that there are different channels by which migrants might come to settle in the EU (see Figure 7). 
Resultatet blir att migranter kan komma fr att bostta sig i EU genom olika kanaler (se figur 7). 14
The migration directives set minimum entry and residence conditions for migrants in the EU a number of which are essential for their successful integration, such as entitlement to family reunification and access to the labour market, education or social welfare. 
Migrationsdirektiven innehller minimivillkor fr inresa och vistelse fr migranter i EU, varav ett antal r grundlggande fr att deras integration ska lyckas, ssom rtt till familjeterfrening och tilltrde till arbetsmarknaden, utbildning eller sociala frmner.
Depending on the migration channel used and on the purpose of their residence (e.g. refugee, highly skilled worker, family member, student, etc.), migrants are governed by different sets of conditions. 
Beroende p vilken migrationskanal som anvnts och syftet med deras vistelse (t.ex. flykting, hgkompetent arbetstagare, familjemedlem, student etc.) omfattas migranterna av olika uppsttningar villkor.
See Annex VI for the conditions in force in March 2018 for the 25 Member States that apply EU rules21. 
Se bilaga VI fr de villkor som gllde i mars 2018 fr de 25 medlemsstater som tillmpar EU:s regler21.
In March 2018 the legislation was under review (see Annex V). 
I mars 2018 hll lagstiftningen p att ndras (se bilaga V).
Specifically on integration related issues, the main change proposed by the Commission concerns a reduction from nine to six months in the maximum waiting period before asylum seekers can access employment. 
Den strsta frndringen som kommissionen freslr specifikt fr integrationsfrgor innebr att den maximala vntetiden innan asylskande kan f tilltrde till arbetsmarknaden frkortas frn nio till sex mnader. 15
Responsibility for the implementation of the EU migration law lies with Member States, who are required to transpose EU directives into national legislation. 
Ansvaret fr genomfrandet av EU:s migrationslagar ligger hos medlemsstaterna, som r skyldiga att infrliva EU-direktiv i den nationella lagstiftningen.
Since Member States have some discretion as to how they do this, the rules applied to migrants are not identical in all EU Member States. 
Eftersom medlemsstaterna i viss utstrckning sjlva avgr hur de gr detta r de regler som tillmpas fr migranter inte identiska i alla EU:s medlemsstater.
Several publications22 provide examples of those differences. 
Flera publikationer22 innehller exempel p dessa skillnader.
This divergence in the national rules applied to migrants is one of the factors that might motivate migrants, including refugees and asylum seekers, to move from the country they first arrive in to another country23. In 2016, 30 % of asylum applicants had previously lodged an application in another Member State24. 
Skillnaderna i de nationella regler som gller fr migranter r en av de faktorer som kan motivera migranter, och ven flyktingar och asylskande, att flytta frn det land dit de frst anlnde till ett annat land23. r 2016 hade 30 % av de asylskande tidigare lmnat in en anskan i en annan medlemsstat24.
This delays the start of the integration process and may lead to a less effective integration of those migrants as the earlier integration starts, the more likely it is to be successful25. 
Detta gr att starten p integrationsprocessen frdrjs och kan leda till att integrationen av dessa migranter blir mindre effektiv eftersom ju tidigare integrationen startar, desto mer sannolikt r det att den lyckas25.
Another delaying factor is the waiting period for applications to be processed. 
En annan frdrjande faktor r den vnteperiod som behvs fr att behandla anskningar.
Seven reports from the SAIs (regarding five Member States) described it as 'long'. 
I sju rapporter frn nationella revisionsorgan (i fem medlemsstater) beskrevs den som ÓlngÓ.
In our report on the Commission’s 'hotspot' approach26, we also concluded that the procedures that followed the arrival and registration of the migrant (asylum, relocation and return), in place at the time of the audit, were often slow and subject to several bottlenecks. 
I vr rapport om kommissionens system med mottagningscentrum (hotspots)26 var slutsatsen ocks att frfarandena efter det att migranten anlnt och registrerats (asyl, omplacering och tervndande), som tillmpades nr revisionen gjordes, ofta gick lngsamt och hade flera flaskhalsar.
15 Challenge 1: Reducing delays in the start of integration The earlier integration starts, the more likely it is to be successful. 
I vr enkt svarade fyra medlemsstater att 16 Utmaning 1: Minska frdrjningarna av starten p integration Ju tidigare integrationen startar, desto mer sannolikt r det att den lyckas.
Factors that delay the start to the integration process (such as when migrants move on to another EU Member State because of, for example, divergences in national rules regarding entry and residence conditions, or long waiting periods to process applications) may affect the effective integration of migrants into society. 
Om integrationsprocessens start blir frdrjd (som nr migranter flyttar till en annan EU-medlemsstat p grund av exempelvis olikheter mellan nationella regler om villkoren fr inresa och vistelse, eller lng vntan p att anskningar ska behandlas) kan det leda till en mindre effektiv integration av migranter i samhllet.
EU legislation provides a framework for anti-discrimination in the Treaty28, in the EU Charter of Cheng has been studying in the EU for the last four years and he finally got his degree. 
Cheng har studerat i EU under de senaste fyra ren och har till sist ftt sin examen.
He now has a girlfriend and wants to settle. 
Nu har han en flickvn och vill stta bo.
He already knows the language quite well but he cannot find a job; either he is not called for interviews or he is just called for jobs for which he is clearly overqualified. Cheng starts to feel that he is being discriminated against. 
Sprket talar han redan ganska bra, men han kan inte hitta ett jobb, antingen kallas han inte till intervju eller ocks kallas han bara till intervju fr arbeten som han r klart verkvalificerad fr. Cheng brjar knna sig utsatt fr diskriminering.
EU migration law also sets provisions for the equal treatment of migrants, but they are applied differently in the Member States30. 
EU:s migrationslagstiftning innehller ocks regler om lika behandling av migranter, men de tillmpas olika i medlemsstaterna30.
At national level, most Member States are making efforts to ensure that migrants are not discriminated against: six recently adopted legislation and another four adopted a national action plan and/ or strategy. 
P nationell niv frsker de flesta medlemsstaterna se till att migranter inte diskrimineras: sex antog nyligen lagar och fyra andra antog en nationell tgrdsplan och/eller strategi.
In addition, nine Member States initiated campaigns and awareness raising activities to tackle discrimination31. 
Drutver inledde nio medlemsstater kampanjer och medvetandehjande insatser fr att komma till rtta med diskriminering31.
The EU Fundamental Rights Agency has been providing assistance on fundamental rights to Member States on, for example, combating hate against migrants. 
EU:s byr fr grundlggande rttigheter har gett medlemsstater hjlp i frgor om grundlggande rttigheter som exempelvis kan glla hur hat riktat mot migranter kan bekmpas.
The 2015 Eurobarometer on discrimination in the EU32 showed that 'discrimination on the grounds of ethnic origin is regarded as the most widespread form of discrimination in the EU' and the spring 2017 Standard Eurobarometer33 adds that immigration of people from outside the EU evokes a negative feeling for the majority of Europeans (54 %). 
Eurobarometerunderskningen frn 2015 om diskriminering i EU32 visade att diskriminering p grund av etniskt ursprung anses vara den mest utbredda formen av diskriminering i EU, och Ordinarie Eurobarometer, vren 201733, visade dessutom att invandring av mnniskor frn lnder utanfr EU vcker negativa knslor hos de flesta europer (54 %).
According to the Commission, there is a challenge 'to increase awareness of the already existing protection [on equal rights] and to ensure better practical implementation and application of the [equality] Directives'34. 
Enligt kommissionen r utmaningen att ka medvetenheten om det befintliga skyddet [av lika rttigheter] och att skerstlla ett bttre genomfrande och en bttre tillmpning av [jmstlldhets]direktiven i praktiken34.
EU funds are used to integrate migrants 24. 
EU-fonder anvnds fr att integrera migranter 24.
Actual expenditure on integration is unknown because only AMIF records data on this. 
De faktiska utgifterna fr integration r inte knda eftersom endast Amif registrerar uppgifter om detta.
In the EU budget, action designed to integrate migrants can be financed through several EU funds. 
I EU:s budget kan tgrder som utformas fr att integrera migranter finansieras frn flera EU-fonder.
Figure 8 lists the most relevant sources of finance for the 2014-2020 programme period to support migrant integration, along with other objectives. 
I figur 8 visas de mest relevanta finansieringskllorna fr programperioden 2014Đ2020 nr det gller std till integration av migranter, tillsammans med andra ml.
The total of these funds is €128 billion, but this is a theoretical figure only, if all funds were used exclusively for the integration of migrants. 16 Challenge 2: Guaranteeing equal rights and non-discrimination Equal rights and non-discrimination are important factors in helping migrants integrate successfully. 
Fonderna frfogar totalt ver 128 miljarder euro, men den siffran visar 17 Utmaning 2: Garantera lika rttigheter och icke-diskriminering Lika rttigheter och icke-diskriminering r viktiga faktorer som hjlper migranter att integreras vl.
Ineffective anti-discrimination policies towards migrants might hinder their successful integration into society. 
En ineffektiv politik mot diskriminering av migranter kan utgra ett hinder fr att deras integration i samhllet ska lyckas.
Figure 8 - Overview of the most relevant EU funds to support migrant integration As of March 2018. 
Figur 8 Đ versikt ver de mest relevanta EU-fonderna fr std till integration av migranter I mars 2018.
The amounts include the recent increase of funds in the AMIF (see paragraph 32). 
I beloppen ingr de nyligen hjda beloppen i Amif (se punkt 32).
We assumed that actions related to migrants are confined to specific thematic objectives (ESIF) or to specific objectives (AMIF). 
Vi utgick frn att tgrder riktade till migranter r begrnsade till srskilda tematiska ml (ESI-fonderna) eller srskilda ml (Amif).
Specific objective 2 (Integration/ Legal migration). 
Srskilt ml 2 (Integration/Laglig invandring).
Specific objective 1 (Asylum) could also contain integration related actions, but the amount is not known and has not been included. 
Srskilt ml 1 (Asyl) kunde ocks innehlla integrationsrelaterade tgrder, men beloppet r inte knt och har inte tagits med.
Total available ESIF allocations for all target groups to thematic objectives 8 (Promoting sustainable and quality employment and supporting labour mobility), 9 (Promoting social inclusion, combating poverty and any discrimination) and 10 (Investing in education, training and vocational training for skills and lifelong learning). 
Totalt tillgngliga Esif-anslag fr alla mlgrupper till de tematiska mlen 8 (Frmja hllbar och kvalitativ sysselsttning och arbetskraftens rrlighet), 9 (Frmja social delaktighet och bekmpa fattigdom och diskriminering) och 10 (Investera i utbildning och i vidareutbildning, inklusive yrkesutbildning fr frdigheter och livslngt lrande).
4 5 Source: ECA, based on adopted amounts in the EU programmes as of January 2018, Commission’s website https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu; our survey and Commission’s notes on synergies (see endnote 72). 
Klla: Europeiska revisionsrtten p grundval av: antagna belopp i EU-programmen i januari 2018, kommissionens webbplats https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu, vr enkt och kommissionens skrivelser om synergier (se slutnot 72).
The Commission is also directly managing a part of AMIF. 
En del av Amif frvaltas ocks direkt av kommissionen.
Each of the funds has different objectives regarding migrant integration. For example, while the ESF consistently aims for the integration of migrants into the labour market and addresses social exclusion by providing support for employment, education and social inclusion, the AMIF tackles integration more broadly, focusing in particular on the first stages following the arrival of the migrant in the EU. 
Varje fond har olika ml fr integrationen av migranter Till exempel har ESF konsekvent som ml att integrera migranter p arbetsmarknaden och motarbetar social utestngning genom att stdja utbildning, sysselsttning och social integration, medan Amif behandlar integration p ett bredare stt och inriktar sig i frsta hand p de frsta etapperna efter det att migranten har anlnt till EU.
The FEAD and the EAFRD are designed specifically to alleviate poverty and promote social inclusion, with EAFRD focusing on the rural areas and FEAD more directed towards immediate support regarding food and other basic material assistance. 
Fead och Ejflu r specifikt utformade fr att lindra fattigdom och frmja social delaktighet, dr Ejflu r inriktad p landsbygdsomrden och Fead ger omedelbart std i form av mat och andra basfrndenheter.
The ERDF complements the ESF through more medium and long-term measures regarding social, health, education, housing and childcare infrastructure. 
Eruf kompletterar ESF med tgrder p medellng och lng sikt som gller infrastruktur fr social omsorg, vrd, utbildning, bostder och barnomsorg.
In practice, based on the results of our survey, most Member States are using the AMIF and the ESF to finance support for migrant integration but very few are making use of the other funds listed in Figure 8. 
Enligt svaren p vr enkt anvnder i praktiken de flesta medlemsstaterna Amif och ESF fr att finansiera std till integration av migranter men endast ett ftal utnyttjar de andra fonderna som rknas upp i figur 8.
Our survey also showed that all but six Member States use national funds to integrate migrants. 
Vr enkt visade ocks att alla medlemsstater utom sex anvnde nationella medel fr att integrera migranter.
The EU has increased its action to foster migrant integration since 2015 28. 
EU har kat sina insatser fr att frmja integrationen av migranter sedan 2015 28.
The recent increase in the number of asylum seekers entering the EU (paragraph 3) triggered a number of measures led by the EU, designed to support Member States in the task of integrating migrants. 
Den senaste tidens kning av antalet asylskande som anlnde till EU (punkt 3) utlste ett antal EU-ledda tgrder som utformades fr att ge medlemsstaterna std i uppgiften att integrera migranter.
Managing migration has become one of the top 10 political priorities of the Commission36 and the need for effective migrant integration policies was emphasised in the 2015 'European Agenda on Migration'37. 
Migrationshantering har blivit en av kommissionens tio viktigaste politiska prioriteringar36 och ndvndigheten av en effektiv politik fr integration av migranter understrks 2015 i den europeiska migrationsagendan37.
The EU has responded by treating refugee related costs flexibly, increasing the focus of the European Semester on migration related issues, mobilising additional funding and by adopting an Action Plan for migrant integration. 
EU har reagerat genom att hantera flyktingrelaterade kostnader flexibelt, ka den europeiska planeringsterminens fokus p migrationsfrgor, mobilisera ytterligare medel och anta en handlingsplan fr integration av migranter.
The Stability and Growth Pact provides flexibility in the treatment of refugee related costs 29. 
Stabilitet-och tillvxtpakten ger flexibilitet i behandlingen av flyktingkostnader 29.
The Stability and Growth Pact (the 'Pact')38 aims to ensure the sustainability of Member States’ public finances39. 
Syftet med stabilitet-och tillvxtpakten (pakten)38 r att skerstlla hllbarhet i medlemsstaternas offentliga finanser39.
The Pact’s provisions allow for some flexibility in the treatment of a Member State’s fiscal position40: this applies, for instance, in the case of unusual events, outside the government’s control, which have a significant impact on public finances41. 
Paktens bestmmelser ger mjlighet till viss 19 flexibilitet i behandlingen av en medlemsstats finanspolitiska lge40 som till exempel kan tillmpas om det intrffar ovanliga hndelser som ligger utanfr statens kontroll och har stor inverkan p de offentliga finanserna41.
Since 2015, the Commission has treated the additional spending from the increase in inward migration of asylum seekers as an unusual event; this can reduce the adjustments required by the Pact42. 
Sedan 2015 behandlar kommissionen de ytterligare utgifterna p grund den kade invandringen av asylskande som en ovanlig hndelse, vilket kan minska de justeringar som krvs enligt pakten42.
Five Member States (Belgium, Italy, Hungary, Austria and Finland) benefited from the flexibility clauses for 2015 and five for 2016 (Belgium, Italy, Austria, Slovenia and Finland)43. 
Fem medlemsstater (Belgien, Italien, Ungern, sterrike och Finland) utnyttjade flexibilitetsklausulerna fr 2015 och fem fr 2016 (Belgien, Italien, sterrike, Slovenien och Finland)43.
In 2016, for example, this flexibility helped these Member States to fund around 2.6 billion euro of costs of hosting refugees. 
Under 2016 till exempel hjlpte denna flexibilitet medlemsstaterna att finansiera omkring 2,6 miljarder euro i kostnader fr flyktingmottagande.
The topic of migration was also subject to a more detailed economic analysis during the European Semester cycles after 201444. 
Migrationsfrgan var ven freml fr en mer detaljerad ekonomisk analys under de europeiska planeringsterminerna efter 201444.
Based on the analyses carried-out in 2016 and 2017, the Council issued country specific recommendations directly targeting migrant-related policies to: Austria, Belgium and Finland in 2016 and Austria, Belgium and France in 2017. 
P grundval av de analyser som gjordes 2016 och 2017 utfrdade rdet landspecifika rekommendationer direkt inriktade p migrationsrelaterad politik till: sterrike, Belgien och Finland under 2016 och sterrike, Belgien och Frankrike under 2017.
The recommendations mainly refer to the need to improve policies in the field of education, vocational training and labour market for people with a migrant background. 
Rekommendationerna handlar i frsta hand om behovet av att frbttra politiken fr utbildning, yrkesutbildning och arbetsmarknad fr personer med migrantbakgrund.
The EU increased its support to Member States in the use of EU funds for migrant integration 32. 
EU kade sitt std till medlemsstater om anvndningen av EU-medel till integration av migranter 32.
In response to the increase in the migration inflows, starting from 2015, the EU budget mobilized over €5 000 million of additional funding for migration up to 2021. 
Som en reaktion p det kade infldet av migranter mobiliserade EU:s budget, med brjan 2015, ver 5 000 miljoner euro i ytterligare anslag till migration fram till 2021.
About €3 200 million of this came from its flexibility instrument45 and more than €2 000 million through its contingency margin46. 
Omkring 3 200 miljoner euro av beloppet kom frn dess flexibilitetsinstrument45 och ver 2 000 miljoner euro via dess marginal fr ofrutsedda utgifter46.