natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The fact that the UN Agency reached only 5 % of the beneficiaries does not mean that the remaining 95 % were left without assistance but rather that they were assisted by other aid agencies thus rendering UN AgenciesŐ aid unnecessary. 
Det faktum att FN-organet endast ndde 5 % av bistndsmottagarna innebr inte att resterande 95 % inte har ftt ngon hjlp utan snarare att de fick hjlp av andra organ. Drmed behvdes inte FN:s bistnd.
RECOMMENDATIONS 50. 
REKOMMENDATIONER 50.
The Commission fully recognises the importance of the national ownership on a disaster response. 
Kommissionen erknner vikten av det nationella egenansvaret nr det gller att hantera katastrofer.
In a crisis context, the Commission works through the UN system and has been supporting OCHA (financially and operationally) in their coordination role which includes liaising with the national authorities. 
I krissammanhang arbetar kommissionen via FN-systemet och har sttt Unocha (ekonomiskt och operativt) i dess samordningsroll som inbegriper att ansvara fr samordningen med de nationella myndigheterna.
Further, at field level, the Commission coordinates and exchanges information with the national authorities through its Delegations and, on more technical matters, through CommissionŐs humanitarian and technical support personnel present in the field. 
P fltet samordnar och utbyter kommissionen information med nationella myndigheter via delegationerna och, nr det gller mer tekniska frgor, via kommissionens personal fr humanitrt och tekniskt std p fltet.
In addition, partners funded by the Commission are required to coordinate with national and local authorities. 
Dessutom r partner som fr finansiering av kommissionen skyldiga att samordna sin verksamhet med nationella och lokala myndigheter.
The Commission also recognises that the capacity of governments to handle donor coordination in emergencies is best supported beforehand through structural development programmes (for instance in the context of improving the countryŐs preparedness to cope with natural disasters). 
Kommissionen konstaterar ven att regeringarnas kapacitet att hantera samordningen av givarna vid katastrofer bst kan stdjas p frhand genom strukturella utvecklingsprogram (till exempel i samband med att man frbttrar ett lands beredskap att hantera naturkatastrofer).
The Commission fully endorses the CourtŐs recommendation to clarify the roles of DG ECHO and DG Environment (Civil Protection Mechanism). 
Kommissionen instmmer helt i revisionsrttens rekommendation att rollerna fr GD ECHO och GD Milj (rddningstjnstmekanismen) br klargras.
The roles of the two services were discussed in May 2002, and lead to a Memorandum of Understanding between DG ECHO and DG Environment in March 2003. 
Rollerna fr de tv avdelningarna diskuterades i maj 2002, vilket resulterade i ett samfrstndsavtal mellan GD ECHO och GD Milj i mars 2003.
In view of the experiences since that date and of the CourtŐs recommendation, the following steps will be taken: firstly, the Commission will better inform the institutions and organisations involved in international emergency assistance about the respective roles and functions of the CommunityŐs humanitarian assistance, managed by DG ECHO, and the Community Civil Protection Mechanism, managed by DG Environment, and the additional and specific assets the mechanism can provide to the victims affected by major natural disasters. 
Mot bakgrund av erfarenheterna sedan dess och revisionsrttens rekommendationer kommer fljande tgrder att vidtas: Fr det frsta kommer kommissionen att tydligare informera de institutioner och organisationer som arbetar med internationell katastrofhjlp om de olika rollerna och uppgifterna fr gemenskapens humanitra bistnd som frvaltas av GD ECHO respektive fr gemenskapens rddningstjnstmekanism som frvaltas av GD Milj och om de andra och specifika resurser som mekanismen kan tillhandahlla de som drabbas av allvarliga naturkatastrofer.
In addition, a joint note from the relevant Commission services to EC Delegations in third countries in that respect is being prepared; secondly, the Commission is committed to take on board key recommendations made by both the HAC and Civil Protection Committee, notably as regards the need to further refine the terms of reference for the MIC operations. 
Dessutom r en gemensam not om detta mne frn de berrda avdelningarna i kommissionen till delegationerna i tredjelnder under utarbetande. Fr det andra r kommissionen fast besluten att tillmtesg de viktigaste rekommendationerna frn svl kommittn fr humanitrt bistnd som rddningstjnstkommittn, i synnerhet nr det gller behovet att ytterligare finslipa direktiven fr vervaknings-och informationscentrums insatser.
The Commission had already identified the delays in some project components mentioned by the Court and taken the required action (see paragraph 35). 
Kommissionen har redan kartlagt frseningarna i vissa delar av de projekt som revisionsrtten nmner och vidtagit ndvndiga tgrder (se punkt 35).
The Commission considers that it is not appropriate to change the regulatory base in order to extend the timeframe for primary emergency and emergency humanitarian actions. 
Kommissionen menar att det inte r lmpligt att ndra den rttsliga grunden fr att frlnga tidsperioden fr de frsta akuta ndinsatserna och det pfljande humanitra katastrofbistndet.
The Commission will reinforce the monitoring system to accommodate the CourtŐs recommendations in the most appropriate manner. (d) The Commission believes that while it is true that emphasis for DG ECHO (and the rest of the humanitarian actors) has moved towards the evaluation of results, achievements and impact, this does not mean that DG ECHO does not adequately monitor project activities. 
Kommissionen kommer att bygga ut sitt vervakningssystem fr att p det mest lmpliga sttet tillmtesg revisionsrttens rekommendationer. d) Kommissionen anser att det visserligen stmmer att GD ECHO (och alla andra humanitra aktrer) har ndrat inriktning mot utvrdering av resultat och effekter, men att detta inte innebr att GD ECHO inte vervakar projektverksamheten i tillrckligt hg grad.
Information on what has been done where is furthermore provided in partnersŐ interim, pre-final and final reports instead of in the monitoring reports. 
Information om vad som har gjorts var finns dessutom i partnernas halvtidsrapporter, preliminra slutrapporter och slutrapporter, i stllet fr i vervakningsrapporterna.
The matter has been reported to the UN and was discussed at the April 2006 meeting of the FAFA Working Group. 
Saken har rapporterats till FN och diskuterades p mtet fr arbetsgruppen fr det ekonomiska och administrativa ramavtalet i april 2006.
26.7.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 174/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 4/2006 concerning Phare investment projects in Bulgaria and Romania, together with the replies of the Commission (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, of the EC Treaty) (2006/C 174/01) CONTENTS LISTOFABBREVIATIONS ............................................................... 
26.7.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 174/1 I (Meddelanden) REVISIONSRTTEN SRSKILD RAPPORT nr 4/2006 om investeringsprojekt inom Phareprogrammet i Bulgarien och Rumnien samt kommissionens svar (i enlighet med artikel 248.4 andra stycket i EG-frdraget) (2006/C 174/01) INNEHLLSF RTECKNING F RKORTNINGAR .....................................................................
OverallPhareobjective ................................................... 
INLEDNING ...............................................................
Phareprogrammingandimplementation ..................................... Financial significance of investment support in national programmes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
DetvergripandemletfrPhareprogrammet ................................. PhareĐprogramplaneringochgenomfrande .................................
ProjectswereinlinewithoverallPhareobjectives .............................. 
IAKTTAGELSER ............................................................
Investmentstookplace ................................................... 
Detgjordesinvesteringar ................................................. ver hlften av projekten fungerade inte som det var tnkt d granskningen gjordes FrstrkningavallmnnaklagarmyndigheteniBulgarien....................
Overhalfofprojectsnotoperatingasintendedatthetimeofaudit ................ 
EfterprivatiseringsfondeniBulgarien ....................................
StrengtheningthePublicProsecutorŐsOfficeinBulgaria ..................... 
AvregleringavenergisektorniRumnien .................................
BulgarianPost-PrivatisationFund(BPPF).................................. EnergysectorliberalisationinRomania .................................. 
JordbruksstatistikiBulgarien .......................................... AsyliRumnien ....................................................
Riskstotechnicalviability ............................................ Riskstoeconomicviability ............................................ 
Riskerfrdentekniskahllbarheten..................................... Riskerfrdenekonomiskahllbarheten.................................. SLUTSATSEROCHREKOMMENDATIONER ......................................
CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS ..................................... 
Kommissionenssvar........................................................
Paragraph Page 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 15 
Punkt Sida 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 10 15
It was set up in 1989 and originally aimed only at two countries: Poland and Hungary ProsecutorŐs Office Small and medium-sized enterprises Unified information filing system 
Det inrttades 1989 och var ursprungligen endast inriktat p tv lnder Đ Polen och Ungern.
26.7.2006 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. The Phare programme provides financial assistance to countries in central and eastern Europe which are candidates to join the European Union. 
26.7.2006 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning SAMMANFATTNING I. Genom Phareprogrammet ges ekonomiskt std till de lnder i Central-och steuropa som kandiderar till medlemskap i Europeiska unionen.
The Commission and the national authorities share the management of the Phare programme. 
Kommissionen och de nationella myndigheterna delar p frvaltningen av Phareprogrammet.
The Commission has overall responsibility for managing the programme. 
Kommissionen har det vergripande ansvaret fr frvaltningen av programmet.
Recipient countries have primary responsibility for undertaking and operating the projects (see paragraphs 8 to 10). 
De mottagande lnderna har huvudansvaret fr att genomfra och driva projekten (se punkterna 8Đ10).
The purpose of the CourtŐs audit was to assess the performance of Phare supported investment projects in Bulgaria and Romania. 
Syftet med revisionsrttens granskning var att bedma hur Pharestdda investeringsprojekt i Bulgarien och Rumnien hade fungerat.
The conclusions are based on the examination of a sample of projects financed under the Phare National Programmes 2000. 
Slutsatserna baseras p underskningar av ett urval av projekt som finansierades genom de nationella Phareprogrammen 2000.
The final payments for these programmes were made in 2005 (see paragraphs 12 to 14). 
Slutbetalningarna fr dessa program gjordes 2005 (se punkterna 12Đ14).
The audited projects were generally in line with the overall investment objectives of Phare, namely to facilitate the alignment with EU norms and standards or to assist in the context of economic and social cohesion (ESC) programmes (see paragraphs 15 and 16). 
De granskade projekten verensstmde i allmnhet med de vergripande mlen fr Phareinvesteringar, nmligen att underltta anpassningen till EU:s normer och standarder eller ge std inom ramen fr programmen fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning (se punkterna 15Đ16).
The Court also got assurance that, in general, the projects were put into place in accordance with the conditions of the supply and works contracts (see paragraphs 17 and 18). 
Revisionsrtten uppndde ocks skerhet om att projekten i allmnhet hade genomfrts i enlighet med villkoren i varu-och bygg-och anlggningskontrakten (se punkterna 17Đ18).
For over half of the investment projects audited, assets were not, or only partially, being used for the intended purpose. 
Fr ver hlften av de granskade investeringsprojekten anvndes tillgngarna inte alls, eller bara delvis, fr det avsedda syftet.
Output and results lagged considerably behind schedule, sometimes by up to two years. 
Aktiviteter och resultat lg betydligt efter tidsplanen; ibland med upp till tv r.
These shortcomings were due to the continuing lack of both administrative capacity and national resources. 
Dessa brister berodde p att det fortfarande saknades bde administrativ kapacitet och nationella resurser.
This illustrates the need for the national authorities to make further substantial efforts to finalise the projects and to achieve the underlying project objectives (see paragraphs 19 to 42). 
Detta visar att de nationella myndigheterna mste fortstta att gra stora anstrngningar fr att slutfra projekten och uppn de underliggande projektmlen (se punkterna 19Đ42).
V. Phare support for the two projects led by international financial institutions was problematic. 
V. Det fanns problem med Pharestdet till de tv projekt som leddes av internationella finansiella institutioner.
In Bulgaria, the Post-Privatisation Fund lacked efficiency and effectiveness (low level of equity investments opposed to high management costs), whereas in Romania the Phare contribution did not provide clear added value for a better regulatory infrastructure in the electricity market (see paragraphs 32 to 36 and paragraphs 37 and 38). 
I Bulgarien var inte efterprivatiseringsfonden effektiv och ndamlsenlig (lga kapitalinvesteringar och hga frvaltningskostnader), medan Pharebidraget i Rumnien inte tydligt bidrog med mervrde till en frbttring av regelverket fr elmarknaden (se punkterna 32Đ36 och 37Đ38).
With regard to the supported business parks and incubators many management problems are still to be solved to achieve the desired economic viability (see paragraphs 43 to 56). 
Nr det gller de fretagsparker och inkubatorer som har ftt std terstr det fortfarande att lsa mnga frvaltningsproblem fr att den nskade ekonomiska hllbarheten skall uppns (se punkterna 43Đ56).
While its checking of projects prior to financing (ex ante control) proved to be effective, the Court criticises the CommissionŐs overall management of investment projects in three particular areas: Ń it overestimated the management capacity of the public authorities in Bulgaria and Romania and often agreed with their overambitious targets and deadlines, Ń it neglected the principles of sustainability and co-financing, Ń it did not consider enough the expected added value and catalytic effect of Phare money in activities led by international financial institutions. 
Kommissionen har srskilt ansvar fr att utforma policyn fr Phare, programplanera Pharestd och vervaka det. ven om dess kontroll av projekt fre finansiering (frhandskontrollen) befanns vara ndamlsenlig kritiserar revisionsrtten kommissionens vergripande frvaltning av investeringsprojekt p dessa tre specifika omrden: Ń Kommissionen verskattade den administrativa kapaciteten hos de offentliga myndigheterna i Bulgarien och Rumnien och kom ofta verens med dem om verambitisa ml och tidsfrister. Ń Kommissionen frsummade principerna om lngsiktighet och medfinansiering.
Accordingly the Commission should take steps to improve its management regarding these three aspects (see paragraphs 57 to 61). 
Fljaktligen br kommissionen vidta tgrder fr att frbttra sin frvaltning i dessa tre avseenden (se punkterna 57Đ61).
C 174/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 26.7.2006 INTRODUCTION Overall Phare objective 1. 
C 174/4 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 26.7.2006 INLEDNING Det vergripande mlet fr Phareprogrammet 1.
Since 1997 the overall objective of the Phare programme has been to help the central and eastern European countries (CEEC) to prepare to join the European Union. 
Sedan 1997 har det vergripande mlet fr Phareprogrammet varit att hjlpa lnderna i Central-och steuropa att frbereda sig infr en anslutning till Europeiska unionen.
In order to support the reforms required for EU membership, the Phare programme provides financial assistance as part of the UnionŐs pre-accession strategy. 
Fr att stdja de reformer som krvs fr EU-medlemskap lmnas genom Phareprogrammet ekonomiska bidrag som en del av unionens franslutningsstrategi.
In October 1999 the Commission adopted specific guidelines for the implementation of the Phare programme for the period 2000 to 2006 (1). 
I oktober 1999 antog kommissionen srskilda riktlinjer fr genomfrandet av Phareprogrammet under perioden 2000Đ2006 (1).
According to these guidelines Phare support had to focus on two main priorities, investment and institution building (2). 
Enligt riktlinjerna skulle Pharestdet inriktas p tv prioriterade omrden nmligen investeringar och institutionsuppbyggnad (2).
After the accession of 10 countries in May 2004 a major focus of the enlargement policy became the implementation of the accession roadmaps for Bulgaria and Romania. 
Nr tio nya lnder hade anslutit sig i maj 2004 inriktades utrikespolitiken i hg grad p att genomfra frdplanerna fr anslutning fr Bulgarien och Rumnien.
After the closure of the accession negotiations in December 2004 the Commission adopted in February 2005 a favourable opinion on the accession of these two countries to the EU. 
Nr anslutningsfrhandlingarna hade avslutats i december 2004 antog kommissionen i februari 2005 ett positivt yttrande om dessa tv lnders anslutning till EU.
Following the green light given by the European Parliament, the Treaty of Accession with Bulgaria and Romania was signed in April 2005 in Luxembourg. 
Nr Europaparlamentet hade lmnat sitt godknnande undertecknades anslutningsfrdraget med Bulgarien och Rumnien i april 2005 i Luxemburg.
This signature paves the way for the ratification procedures that will formalise BulgariaŐs and RomaniaŐs membership on 1 January 2007. 
Genom undertecknandet ppnas vgen fr de ratificeringsfrfa-randen som kommer att leda till att Bulgariens och Rumniens medlemskap formaliseras den 1 januari 2007.
However the Council may decide to postpone the date of accession by one year to 1 January 2008 if either State does not fulfil the commitments undertaken during the negotiations. 
Rdet kan dock besluta att skjuta upp tidpunkten fr anslutning med ett r till den 1 januari 2008 om ngon av staterna inte uppfyller de taganden som gjordes i samband med frhandlingarna.
Phare programming and implementation 5. 
Phare Đ programplanering och genomfrande 5.
The EUŐs ongoing pre-accession strategy for Bulgaria and Romania is based on the Accession Partnerships (AP), which provide a framework for the programming of priorities and financial resources. 
EU:s gllande franslutningsstrategi fr Bulgarien och Rumnien baseras p de partnerskap fr anslutning som anger ramen fr programplaneringen av prioriteringar och finansiella resurser.
On the basis of the priorities identified in the APs, financial assistance is made available through annual financing decisions taken by the Commission. 
P grundval av de prioriteringar som angetts i partnerskapen fr anslutning stlls ekonomiska bidrag till frfogande genom rliga finansieringsbeslut som fattas av kommissionen.
These financing decisions are followed by financing memoranda agreed between the Commission and the Bulgarian and Romanian authorities. 
Dessa finansieringsbeslut fljs av finansieringsverenskommelser som ings av kommissionen och myndigheterna i Bulgarien och Rumnien.
Financing memoranda are concluded (1) SEC(1999) 1596 final: Guidelines for Phare programme implementation in candidate countries for the period 2000 to 2006 in application of Article 8 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89, Brussels, 13.10.1999. 
Finansieringsverenskommelserna (1) SEK(1999) 1596 slutlig: Riktlinjer fr genomfrandet av Phareprogrammet i kandidatlnderna under 2000Đ2006 i enlighet med artikel 8 i frordning (EEG) nr 3906/89, Bryssel 13.10.1999.
The guidelines were revised in September 2002 and in December 2003. 
Riktlinjerna ndrades i september 2002 och december 2003.
(2) Investment normally means buildings and equipment, for which the National Authorities conclude works and supply contracts. 
(2) Med investeringar menas normalt byggnader och utrustning fr vilka nationella myndigheter ingr varu-och bygg-och anlggningskontrakt.
Institution building is defined as the process of helping the candidate countries to develop the structures, strategies, human resources and management skills needed to strengthen their economic, social, regulatory and administrative capacity. 
Institutionsuppbyggnad definieras som processen att hjlpa kandidatlnderna bygga upp de strukturer, strategier, mnskliga resurser och den frvaltningsfrmga som krvs fr att de skall kunna strka sin ekonomiska, sociala och administrativa kapacitet liksom sin lag-stiftningskapacitet.
The main instrument is Twinning (see the CourtŐs Special Report No 6/2003 concerning Twinning as the main instrument to support institution building in candidate countries). regarding national programmes and specific subjects such as cross-border cooperation programmes, multicountry programmes or nuclear safety programmes. 
Det viktigaste instrumentet r partnersamverkan (se revisionsrttens srskilda rapport nr 6/2003 om partnersamverkan ÓtwinningÓ som huvudinstrument till std fr institutionsuppbyggnad i kandidatlnderna). ings fr nationella program och specifika omrden ssom program fr grnsverskridande samarbete, program fr flera lnder eller krnskerhetsprogram.
The annual national programmes finance priority needs related to accession. 
Genom de rliga nationella programmen finansieras prioriterade behov som hr samman med anslutningen.
Financing memoranda are accompanied by the so-called Project Fiches which set out the details of all projects to be implemented. 
Till finansieringsverenskommelserna hr s kallade projektunderlag med detaljuppgifter om alla projekt som skall genomfras.
Project Fiches are key planning documents, giving the objectives of each project including indicators of achievement and the timetable for implementation. 
Projektunderlagen r centrala i planeringen och dr anges mlen fr varje projekt inklusive resultatindikatorer och en tidtabell fr genomfrandet.
As a rule, projects have to be implemented within three years of the signature of the financing memorandum. 
Som regel skall projekten genomfras inom tre r frn undertecknandet av finansieringsverenskommelsen.
The management of the Phare programme is shared between the Commission and the national authorities. 
Frvaltningen av Phareprogrammet delas mellan kommissionen och de nationella myndigheterna.
The Commission (Headquarters and Delegations in Sofia and Bucharest) is responsible for the overall management of the Phare programme and in particular for the development of Phare policy, the programming of Phare aid and for its supervision. 
Kommissionen (centrala avdelningar och delegationerna i Sofia och Bukarest) ansvarar fr den vergripande frvaltningen av Phareprogrammet och srskilt fr att utforma policyn fr Phare, programplanera Pharestdet och vervaka det.
Primary responsibility for undertaking and operating the projects lies with Bulgaria and Romania. 
Huvudansvaret fr att genomfra och driva projekten ligger hos Bulgarien och Rumnien.
The Phare programme is currently operating in Bulgaria and Romania under the so-called Ôdecentralised implementation systemŐ (DIS). 
Phareprogrammet administreras fr nrvarande i Bulgarien och Rumnien enligt det s kallade systemet fr decentraliserat genomfrande (ÓDecentralised Implementation System, DISÓ).