natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission agrees that the recovery rate is low but this assessment can be explained by the fact that, in matters of shared management, recovery procedures are not uniform nor harmonised in Member States and this is an unexpected effect of the assimilation principle posed by Article 280 of the Treaty which jeopardises the uniformity of implementation of Community legislation because recovery of Community monies follows the national rules. 
Kommissionen hller med om att tervinningsgraden r lg, men denna bedmning kan frklaras av att tervinningsfrfarandena vid delad frvaltning inte r enhetliga eller harmoniserade i medlemsstaterna. Detta r en ovntad effekt av assimila-tionsprincipen i artikel 280 i frdraget, och den skadar enhetligheten i genomfrandet av gemenskapens lagstiftning eftersom tervinningen av gemenskapens medel fljer de nationella reglerna.
However, the Commission has undertaken to bring forward proposals to modify Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 in order to improve the weaknesses of the actual situation (see paragraph 39). (a) In the absence of total recovery, the financial consequences of the irregularities shall be borne by the Member State in the event of irregularities or negligence attributable to administrative authorities or other bodies of the Member States. 
Kommissionen har dock tagit sig att lgga fram frslag till en ndring av frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 och frordning (EEG) nr 595/91 i syfte att tgrda de nuvarande svagheterna (se punkt 39). a) Nr beloppen inte kan tervinnas fullstndigt skall de finansiella konsekvenserna av oegentligheterna pfras medlemsstaten d oegentligheterna eller oaktsamheten kan tillskrivas medlemsstaternas administrativa myndigheter eller vriga organ.
In other cases the burden shall be borne by the Community budget. 
I vriga fall skall de belasta gemenskapens budget.
The case which the Court refers to was notified on 29 May 1991 and updated in 1997. 
Det rende som revisionsrtten syftar anmldes den 29 maj 1991 och aktualiserades r 1997.
The Commission wishes to point out that this case was not included in the TFR audit selection on account of the wrong amount reported in ECR. (b) The objective of the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 is, inter alia, to address the shortcomings pointed out by the Court by making Member Sates more responsible and by providing ex post controls in the clearance-of-accounts framework. (c) According to Article 280(2) of the EC Treaty ÔMember States shall take the same measures to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Community as they take to counter fraud affecting their own financial interestsŐ. There is a 32.(b) and (c) closed. A large number of the cases were already 36. 
Kommissionen nskar ppeka att detta rende inte ingick det granskningsurval som togs upp i arbetsgruppen fr tervinning med anledning av det felaktiga belopp som rapporterats i ECR. b) Syftet med ndringen av frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 och frordning (EEG) nr 595/91 r bl.a. att tgrda de tillkortakommanden som ppekats av revisionsrtten genom att gra medlemsstaterna mer ansvariga och genom att freskriva efterhandskontroller inom ramen fr avslutandet av rkenskaperna. c) Artikel 280.2 i EG-frdraget lyder som fljer: ÓMedlemsstaterna skall vidta samma tgrder fr att bekmpa bedrgerier som riktar sig mot gemenskapens ekonomiska intressen, som de vidtar fr att bekmpa bedrgerier som riktar sig mot 32.b) och c) Ett stort antal renden var redan avslutade. 36.
In the absence of total recovery, the financial consequences of the irregularities shall be borne by the Member State in the event of irregularities or negligence attributable to administrative authorities or other bodies of the Member States. 
Nr beloppen inte kan tervinnas fullstndigt skall de finansiella konsekvenserna av oegentligheterna pfras medlemsstaten om oegentligheterna eller oaktsamheten kan tillskrivas medlemsstaternas administrativa myndigheter eller vriga organ.
In other cases the burden shall be borne by the Community budget. 
I vriga fall skall den belasta gemenskapens budget.
The Commission has defined as early as 1996 the following guideline (1) that the recovery procedure should be launched as soon as possible after the irregularity had been detected and should be completed within four years after the date of the first communication of fraud or irregularity. 
Kommissionen slog redan 1996 (1) fast som riktlinje att tervinningsfrfarandet br inledas snarast mjligt sedan oegentligheten har upptckts och br vara slutfrt inom fyra r efter det frsta meddelandet om det.
In the opposite case, the Member State may be required to show that there was no negligence. 
Om s inte r fallet kan medlemsstaten behva visa att ngon oaktsamhet inte freligger.
The four-year period is extended to eight years in case of judicial procedures, on the condition that the Commission is fully informed of the recovery procedure. 
Fyrarsperioden frlngs till tta r i fall av rttsliga frfaranden, p villkor att kommissionen r fullt informerad om tervinningsfrfarandet.
The Commission has identified a certain number of problems in this context. 
Kommissionen har ringat in ett visst antal problem i detta sammanhang.
In its Communication COM(202) 671 final of 3 December 2002, the Commission recommended the initiation of corrective measures, namely: Ń setting up of the Task Force Recovery to speed up the treatment of the backlog, Ń modifying Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and therefore Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 to prevent new backlogs in the future. 
I sitt meddelande KOM(2002) 671 slutlig, av den 3 december 2002, rekommenderade kommissionen fljande korrigerande tgrder: Ń Bildandet av arbetsgruppen fr tervinning fr att pskynda behandlingen av efterslpningen.
Such provisions on writing off irrecoverable Community entitlements should provide the regulatory basis to carry out this (1) Document VI/5330/97. 
Sdana bestmmelser om avskrivning av gemenskapens otervinnbara fordringar br kunna bilda en regelram s att denna insats kan utfras p ett klokt stt med hjlp av specifika, (1) Dokument VI/5330/97.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/23 (d) (f) constant case law of the ECJ which stipulates that the rules applicable in cases where there are violations to Community law cannot be less favourable than the rules prevailing in cases where there are violations to national law. 
4.11.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 269/23 d) f) deras egna ekonomiska intressen.Ó Enligt EG-domstolens fasta rttspraxis kan regler som r tillmpliga p ml som inbegriper vertrdelser av EG-rtten inte vara mindre frmnliga n regler som gller i ml som inbegriper vertrdelser av nationell lagstiftning.
However this does not amount to conferring a preferential status on CAP debts. 
Detta r dock inte liktydigt med att ge GJP-skulderna preferensstatus.
As regards the outcome of the combined UCLAF/German 1992 investigation, this case will be dealt with in the clearance-of-accounts procedure. 
Nr det gller utfallet av den underskning UCLAF och Tyskland gjorde gemensamt 1992 kommer detta rende att behandlas vid avslutandet av rkenskaperna.
According to Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 the Commission is legally obliged to exclude all expenditure from Community financing where that expenditure has not been executed in compliance with Community rules. 
I enlighet med frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 r kommissionen rttsligen frpliktigad att utesluta alla utgifter frn gemenskapsfinansiering som inte har verkstllts i verensstmmelse med gemenskapsbestmmelserna.
Accepting transactions or partial payments are conditions to be assessed on a case-by-case approach on the basis of national law and in conjunction with the criteria as laid down in Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999. 
Ett godtagande av transaktioner eller delvisa betalningar r villkor som skall bedmas frn fall till fall p basis av nationell lagstiftning och de kriterier som anges i artikel 8 i frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999.
Ń the recovery procedure must be started as soon as possible after the irregularity has been detected and should be completed within four years of the fraud or irregularity first being reported. 
Ń tervinningsfrfarandet mste inledas snarast mjligt sedan oegentligheten upptckts och br vara slutfrd inom fyra r efter det att bedrgeriet eller oegentligheten frst inrappor-terades.
If not, the Member State must show there has been no negligence. 
Om inte mste medlemsstaten visa att ngon oaktsamhet inte freligger.
Ń the treatment of individual cases must be discussed in detail with all the Member States concerned. 
Ń Behandlingen av enskilda renden mste diskuteras i detalj med alla berrda medlemsstater.
As regards the procedural criteria, the questions to be answered are: Ń Has the recovery procedure started? Can it be completed within a reasonable period? 
Betrffande de frfarandemssiga kriterierna mste fljande frgor besvaras: Ń Har tervinningsfrfarandet inletts? Kan det slutfras inom rimlig tid?
Ń Has the recovery procedure not been completed for reasons of force majeure or for other compelling reasons? 
Ń Har tervinningsfrfarandet inte slutfrts p.g.a. force majeure eller av andra tvingande skl?
Ń Was recovery not initiated because of the negligence of the Member State or its failure to take action? 
Ń Inleddes tervinningen ej p grund av medlemsstatens oaktsamhet eller dess underltenhet att vidta tgrder?
Since the creation of the Task Force Recovery, the Commission services have refined the criteria and have drawn up a list of criteria upon which all files are audited in order to have a decision on whether the amounts at stake are charged to the Community budget or to the Member State. 
Sedan bildandet av arbetsgruppen fr tervinning har kommissionens enheter frfinat kriterierna och upprttat en frteckning ver kriterier mot vilken alla renden granskas s att beslut kan fattas om huruvida de aktuella beloppen skall belasta gemenskapens budget eller pfras medlemsstaten.
This audit concerns all outstanding files up to 31 December 1998. 
Denna granskning omfattar alla oavslutade renden fram t.o.m. den 31 december 1998.
There is no link between the financial corrections based on a system analysis and the individual cases of fraud for which amounts have not yet been recovered. 
Det finns inte ngon koppling mellan de finansiella rttelser som bygger p en systemanalys och de enskilda bedrgerirenden dr beloppen nnu inte har tervunnits.
Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Article 5(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 provide clear procedural rules to be followed for the treatment of specific cases of fraud and irregularities. 
Artikel 8.2 i frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 och artikel 5.2 i frordning (EEG) nr 595/91 innehller tydliga procedurregler fr behandlingen av specifika renden gllande bedrgerier och oegentligheter.
As the Court mentioned it in an earlier report (1), the Commission undertook in 1999 a review of all the pre-1995 cases still pending in order to take a decision on whether to charge them to the Community or to the Member States. 
Som revisionsrtten nmnt i en tidigare rapport (1) gjorde kommissionen r 1999 en genomgng av alla renden frn fre 1995 som nnu inte tgrdats fr att besluta om beloppen skulle belasta gemenskapen eller medlemsstaterna.
The exercise was limited to six Member States (2), on account of the poor quality of the available data and also taking into consideration the limited human resources available. 
Arbetet inskrnkte sig till sex medlemsstater (2) med anledning av den dliga kvaliteten p de tillgngliga uppgifterna och ven p.g.a. begrnsad tillgng p personal.
This now contains the number of the Commission Decision, the authority who should bear the loss and the amounts involved. 
Den innehller nu numret p kommissionsbeslutet, den myndighet som br st fr frlusten samt berrda belopp.
(1) Special Report No 22/2000 on evaluation of the reformed clearance-of-accounts procedure (OJ C 69, 2.3.2001). 
(1) Srskild rapport nr 22/2000 om utvrderingen av det reformerade frfarandet vid avslutande av rkenskaperna (EGT C 69, 2.3.2001).
(2) Belgium, Greece, Spain, Ireland, the Netherlands, Portugal. 
(2) Belgien, Grekland, Spanien, Irland, Nederlnderna och Portugal.
42. posals to modify Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 and Regulation (EEC) No 595/91, inter alia, to address the shortcomings pointed out by the Court by making Member States more responsible and by providing ex post controls in the clearance-of-accounts framework. 
42. ndringar av frordning (EG) nr 1258/1999 och frordning (EEG) nr 595/91 bl.a. att tgrda de tillkortakommanden som ppekats av revisionsrtten genom att gra medlemsstaterna mer ansvariga och genom att freskriva efterhandskontroller inom ramen fr avslutandet av rkenskaperna.
During 2003, the Commission has updated the figures on amounts written off as at the end of 2002. 
Under 2003 har kommissionen aktualiserat siffrorna p belopp som var avskrivna vid utgngen av 2002.
The updated figures are: Ń charged to Member States: EUR 144 million, Ń charged to EAGGF: EUR 153 million. 
De aktualiserade siffrorna r som fljer: Ń Belopp pfrda medlemsstaterna: 144 miljoner euro. Ń Belopp som belastar EUGFJ: 153 miljoner euro.
The Commission shares the concern of the Court about the management and recovery of EAGGF debt. 
Kommissionen delar revisionsrtten oro om frvaltningen och tervinningen av EUGFJ-skulden.
It points to the efforts made through the reform of the clearance of accounts in 1996 together with the developments discussed in paragraphs 39 and 41 of the replies. 
Den pekar p de anstrngningar som gjorts genom reformen av avslutandet av rkenskaperna r 1996 tillsammans med de frndringar som diskuteras i punkterna 39 och 41 i svaret.
These cases will be dealt with in the clearance-of-accounts procedure. 
Dessa renden kommer att behandlas vid avslutandet av rkenskaperna.
The Commission has applied four guiding principles and a number of procedural criteria documented in July 2002. 
Kommissionen har tillmpat fyra vgledande principer och ett antal frfarandemssiga kriterier som faststlldes i juli 2002.
As regards the guiding principles: Ń if the whole amount cannot be recovered for objective reasons and the Member State has done all it can to recover the amount on time without displaying any negligence, the unrecovered amounts are charged to the Community budget. 
De vgledande principerna r de fljande: Ń Om hela beloppet av objektiva skl inte kan tervinnas och medlemsstaten har gjort allt den kunnat fr att tervinna beloppet i tid och inte dagalagt ngon oaktsamhet, skall de icke tervunna beloppen belasta gemenskapens budget.
Ń in all other cases, where the irregularity is attributed to the Member State or where the recovery procedures have not been conducted with all the diligence required, the amounts in question are charged to defaulting Member States. 
Ń I alla vriga renden dr oegentligheten tillskrivs medlemsstaten eller dr tervinningsfrfarandena inte sktts med all erforderlig uthllighet pfrs de aktuella beloppen den frsumliga medlemsstaten.
The Commission has undertaken to bring forward pro- 
Kommissionen har tagit sig att lgga fram frslag till
C 269/24 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 The distribution of the costs of writes off between the Commu-nitiy budget and Member States budget in the June 2003 decision should not be taken as a precedent for future decisions. 
C 269/24 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 4.11.2004 Frdelningen av avskrivningskostnaderna mellan gemenskapens budget och medlemsstaternas budget i beslutet frn juni 2003 skall inte ses som ngot prejudikat fr framtida beslut.
In respect of Italy, which appeared to be the largest debtor, due to the large number of Italian cases and the poor cooperation of the Member State, it was decided in 1999 to concentrate on the cases of other Member States and to postpone the scrutiny of Italian files. 
Fr Italiens del, som frefll vara den strsta gldenren p.g.a. det stora antalet italienska renden och landets dliga samarbete, beslt man r 1999 att koncentrera sig p andra medlemsstaters renden och att skjuta upp granskningen av de italienska fallen.
The Commission set up a Task Force Recovery in 2003 in order to clear all the pending irregularity cases prior to 1999. 
Kommissionen bildade 2003 en arbetsgrupp fr tervinning i syfte att avveckla alla oavslutade fall av oegentligheter frn fre r 1999.
In the framework of the audits carried out by the Task Force Recovery throughout 2003, the remaining pre-1995 files above a given threshold (EUR 500 000) were examined for nine Member States (1). 
Inom ramen fr denna arbetsgrupps granskningsarbete under 2003 undersktes de terstende rendena frn fre 1995 ver en viss trskel (500 000 euro) fr nio medlemsstater (1).
In total, 443 cases were examined in the course of this audit, among them 343 cases for Italy. 
Totalt 443 renden undersktes under loppet av denna granskning, bland annat 343 renden som avsg Italien.
In the (1) Belgium, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Portugal, United Kingdom. year 2003 the first basic analyses on the basis of the data of ECR database have been presented to Member States in the framework of the Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ. 
Den relaterade avslutningen av rkenskaperna fr huvuddelen av de underskta rendena pgr just nu. underrttelser. r 2003 har de frsta grundlggande analyserna p basis av uppgifter i ECR-databasen lagts fram fr medlemsstaterna inom ramen fr arbetsgruppen ÓOegentligheter och msesidigt bistnd Đ JordbruksprodukterÓ.
The developments discussed in paragraphs 39 and 41 of the replies should facilitate and speed up the recovery process. 
De frndringar som diskuterats i punkterna 39 och 41 i svaret br underltta och pskynda tervinningsprocessen.
The Commission endorses the CourtŐs statement on the weaknesses of the ECR system and has performed some analyses in which the use and the frequency of codes were examined. 
Kommissionen godtar revisionsrttens pstende om svagheterna i ECR-systemet och har gjort en del analyser dr kod-anvndningen och kodfrekvensen underskts.
The Commission has started a discussion with the Member States on the simplification of the reporting system. 
Kommissionen har inlett en diskussion med medlemsstaterna om frenklingen av rapporteringssystemet.
The Commission has asked Member States to update these cases during the Article 280 Working Group meeting of 12 March 2003 and Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ of 11 March 2003 (see paragraph 25). 
Kommissionen har bett medlemsstaterna att aktualisera dessa renden vid mtet i artikel 280-arbetsgruppen den 12 mars 2003 och vid mtet i arbetsgruppen ÓOegentligheter och msesidigt bistnd Đ JordbruksprodukterÓ den 11 mars 2003 (se punkt 25).
This is however done by analysts of OLAF itself, therefore no direct link between the ECR module and (other) users can be found. 
Detta grs dock av OLAF:s egna analytiker varfr ingen direkt koppling terfinns mellan ECR-modulen och (vriga) anvndare.
Most of the time, data is prepared by OLAF staff on request of other users inside the Community services or outside in Member States such as Austria and Germany, which are using the data to prepare Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89 controls. 
Den mesta tiden frbereder OLAF:s personal uppgifter p begran av andra anvndare inom gemenskapens tjnsteenheter eller utanfr dessa, i medlemsstater som t.ex. sterrike och Tyskland, dr uppgifterna anvnds fr att frbereda kontroller enligt frordning (EEG) nr 4045/89.
The Commission services have presented figures and analyses of the ECR modules in several meetings with the Member States. 
Kommissionens enheter har presenterat siffror och analyser av ECR-modulerna vid flera mten med medlemsstaterna.
The competent authorities of Member States are faced with some delicate legal interpretation of questions and this notwithstanding the guidance provided by the Commission for a uniform interpretation of the black list tool. Among the difficulties put forward by Member States are: Ń the concept of Ôserious negligenceŐ is a legal concept unknown in certain Member States in civil law, having in some Member States more affinity with the criminal process, Ń the absence of an explicit clause which regulates liability in the case of a consortium or associated operators, Ń the risk of having to pay for damages for a blacklisting that was ultimately overturned, which could have serious financial consequences for the Member State involved. 
Behriga myndigheter i medlemsstaterna har ibland problem med den rttsliga tolkningen av olika frgor, trots den vgledning som ges av kommissionen fr en enhetlig tolkning av Ósvarta listanÓ. Bland annat fljande svrigheter har tagits upp av medlemsstaterna: Ń Begreppet Ógrov oaktsamhetÓ r ett rttsligt begrepp som r oknt i vissa medlemsstaters civilrtt, medan det i en del medlemsstater hr mer samman med en straffrttslig process. Ń Frnvaron av en uttrycklig klausul som reglerar ansvar i fall av konsortier eller associerade aktrer.
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/25 66. and 67. 
4.11.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 269/25 66 och 67.
Certifying Bodies have been provided with detailed instructions in the framework of an ad hoc expert meeting in 2002 focused on the checks to be made with Table 105. 
De attesterande organen har ftt detaljerade anvisningar vid ett ad hoc-expertmte 2002 som var koncentrerat p planerade kontroller av tabell 105.
Table 105 aims at: Ń overseeing and control of amounts of liabilities held by Member States, Ń reflection on the level of liabilities, Ń a tentative reconciliation of the data of Table 105 and the Paying AgenciesŐ debtorsŐ ledgers, and Table 104 with the ECR data base managed by OLAF. 
Ń Att ge en bild av nivn p skulderna. Ń Att ge en grund fr sammanjmkning av uppgifterna i tabell 105 och utbetalningsstllenas fordringsliggare samt mellan tabell 104 och ECR-databasen som skts av OLAF.
The Commission services are giving increased attention to this question through a scrutiny of the annual reports of the Certification Bodies. 
Kommissionens enheter riktar mer och mer uppmrksamhet mot denna frga genom noggrann granskning av rsrapporterna frn de attesterande organen.
The Commission informs Member States of OLAFŐs recommendations, which are only mere proposals at that stage, the final decision being taken by the College. 
Kommissionen informerar medlemsstaterna om OLAF:s rekommendationer, som i det stadiet endast r frslag, medan det slutgiltiga beslutet fattas av kommissionskollegiet.
It is not excluded that some Member States already ÔanticipateŐ these recommendations and take them for granted. 
Det r inte uteslutet att en del medlemsstater redan ÓfrutserÓ dessa rekommendationer och tar dem fr givna.
During the clearance-of-accounts procedure, the Commission has very substantial powers; firstly, it is responsible for auditing and evaluating the Member StateŐs management of EAGGF Guarantee expenditure, and secondly, it is the institution which unilaterally decides which amounts to refuse for financing. 
Under avslutandet av rkenskaperna har kommissionen mycket betydande befogenheter. Kommissionen har fr det frsta ansvaret fr granskning och utvrdering av medlemsstatens frvaltning av garantisektionens utgifter, och den r fr det andra den institution som ensidigt beslutar vilka belopp som skall vgras finansiering.
The Commission has asked Members States to undertake a tentative reconciliation of the ECR database with the data of Table 105, bearing in mind that both sets of data will never coincide. 
Kommissionen har bett medlemsstaterna att frska sammanjmka ECR-databasen med uppgifterna i tabell 105, samtidigt som man mste vara fullt medveten om att de bda uppgiftsba-serna aldrig helt kommer stmma verens.
CONCLUSIONS 70. 
SLUTSATS 70.