natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
50 To determine the energy efficiency of appliances, the Ecodesign and energy labelling policy relies on standards developed by standardisation organisations to provide agreed definitions of technical concepts and measurement methods. 
50 Fr att bedma apparaters energieffektivitet frlitar man sig inom politiken fr ekodesign och energimrkning p standarder som tagits fram av standardiseringsorgan fr att tillhandahlla verenskomna definitioner av tekniska koncept och mtmetoder.
Once a standard has been issued by a European standardisation organisation and the Commission has published its title and reference in the Official Journal of the European Union, it becomes a ŇEuropean harmonised standardÓ, and thus part of EU law. 
Nr en standard har utfrdats av ett europeiskt standardiseringsorgan och kommissionen har offentliggjort titel och referens i Europeiska unionens officiella tidning blir det en Óeuropeisk harmoniserad standardÓ och sledes en del av EU:s lagstiftning.
29 STEP project Đ Closing the Ôreality gapŐ Đ ensuring a fair energy label for consumers, CLASP, ECOS, EEB, Topten, June 2017. 
29 Projektet STEP Đ Closing the Óreality gapŐ Đ ensuring a fair energy label for consumers CLASP, ECOS, EEB och Topten, juni 2017.
30 See Definition of Circumvention, ANTICSS, 2018. 
30 Se Definition of Circumvention, ANTICSS, 2018.
51 In the absence of a harmonised standard, older standards, international standards or other relevant methods can be used to measure energy consumption, but this can lead to different results, and the legislation becomes difficult to apply and enforce. 
51 Om det saknas en harmoniserad standard kan ldre standarder, internationella standarder eller andra relevanta metoder anvndas fr att mta energifrbrukning, men det kan leda till olika resultat och det blir svrt att tillmpa och genomfra lagstiftningen.
This is why harmonised standards, which are reliable, accurate, reproducible, and representative of real-life use are important. 
Drfr r det viktigt med harmoniserade standarder som r tillfrlitliga, korrekta, reproducerbara och representativa fr verklig anvndning.
52 Lastly, the EIA is a prospective study, which seeks to evaluate the future impact of a policy rather than the actual results achieved by a certain date. 
52 Avslutningsvis r rapporten om ekodesignens berknade effekter en prospektiv studie som syftar till att utvrdera politikens framtida effekter snarare n de faktiska resultat som uppntts till ett visst datum.
This makes the accounting process sensitive to certain variations in parameters such as future inflation rates or energy prices. In 2019, the Commission revised its assumptions for future energy prices used for impact accounting. 
Det leder till att berkningsprocessen blir knslig fr vissa variationer inom parametrarna, exempelvis framtida inflationstakt och energipriser. r 2019 reviderade kommissionen sina antaganden nr det gller de framtida energipriser som anvnds fr att berkna effekter.
This led to a sharp decrease in the estimated net savings for EU consumers in 2020: the expected annual savings for each household decreased from Ű473 to Ű286. 
Det ledde till en kraftig minskning av de uppskattade nettobesparingarna fr EU:s konsumenter 2020: de frvntade rliga besparingarna fr varje hushll minskade frn 473 euro till 286 euro.
53 An independent study31 pointed out that the EIA is based on scenarios and attempted to reconcile energy savings accounted for by impact accounting and the energy savings observed in Germany for some product groups. 
53 I en oberoende studie31 ppekades att rapporten bygger p scenarier, och man frskte f de energibesparingar som angetts i berkningen av effekter och de energibesparingar som konstaterats i Tyskland fr vissa produktgrupper att stmma verens.
According to the study, the savings observed in reality were significant, but were lower than the projections of the impact accounting, by a significant margin: 2 to 15 times or 1.7 to 11.6 times, depending on the calculation basis and the product group. While the scope and the methodology of the study may not allow a direct comparison with the figures reported by the EIA, the study shows that there is a risk that the savings are overestimated. 
Enligt studien var de besparingar som konstaterats i verkligheten betydande, men med stor marginal lgre n prognoserna fr berkningen av effekter: 2 till 15 gnger eller 1,7 till 11,6 gnger lgre, beroende p berkningsgrund och produktgrupp. ven om studiens metod och omfattning kanske gr att siffrorna inte direkt kan jmfras med rapporten, visar studien att det finns risk fr att besparingarna r verskattade.
54 As the EIA is the only source of information on the contribution of the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling policy to the achievement of the 2020 energy efficiency target, overestimating the results risks providing inaccurate input to policy-makers. 
54 Eftersom rapporten om ekodesignens berknade effekter r den enda informationskllan om bidraget frn politiken fr ekodesign och energimrkning till uppnendet av energieffektivitetsmlet 2020 innebr verskattade resultat att beslutsfattare kan f felaktig input.
In the most recent assessment report of the progress made, by 2018, towards the 2020 energy efficiency targets, the Commission no longer reported on the impact of the policy. 
I den senaste bedmningsrapporten om de framsteg som gjorts till 2018 mot energieffektivitetsmlen 2020, rapporterade kommissionen inte lngre om politikens effekter.
It is not clear whether it will do so in the upcoming reports. 
Det r oklart om den kommer att gra det i kommande rapporter.
31 ko-Institut e.V. and ifeu Đ Institut fr Energie-und Umweltforschung Heidelberg (2017). 
31 ko-Institut e.V. and ifeu Đ Institut fr Energie-und Umweltforschung Heidelberg (2017).
Monitoring the effects of Ecodesign and energy labelling in Germany, ECEEE, 2017. 28 
Monitoring the effects of Ecodesign and energy labelling in Germany, ECEEE, 2017. 30
Market surveillance Manufacturers and retailersŐ non-compliance with the Energy Labelling and Ecodesign legislation reduces the benefits of the policy 55 Market surveillance is an exclusive competence of Member States. 
Marknadskontroll Tillverkares och terfrsljares bristande efterlevnad av lagstiftningen om energimrkning och ekodesign minskar nyttan med politiken 55 Marknadskontroll r en av medlemsstaternas exklusiva befogenheter.
They should comply with the EU Market Surveillance Regulation32. 
De ska flja EU:s frordning om marknadskontroll32.
Market Surveillance Authorities (MSAs) are responsible for ensuring that products sold in their country are compliant. 
Marknadskontrollmyndigheter ansvarar fr att skerstlla att produkter som sljs i deras land fljer lagstiftningen.
Although some consumer protection NGOs have conducted shop inspections and some product tests, they do not have the authority to enforce the regulation, which is the prerogative of MSAs. 
Ngra icke-statliga organisationer fr konsumentskydd har utfrt butiksinspektioner och vissa produkttester, men de har inte befogenhet att genomfra frordningen Đ det tillhr marknadskontrollmyndigheternas behrighet.
56 When shops do not properly display energy labels, consumers find it harder to make an informed decision. 
56 Nr butiker inte visar energimrkningar ordentligt blir det svrare fr konsumenter att fatta vlgrundade beslut.
Incorrect labels may mislead consumers into buying products that consume more energy or have lower performance than claimed. 
Felaktiga mrkningar kan vilseleda konsumenterna till att kpa produkter som frbrukar mer energi eller har lgre prestanda n vad som hvdas.
57 Since 2009, EU-funded market surveillance projects have financed shop inspections and laboratory tests to check whether products comply with Ecodesign and Energy Labelling requirements and that their energy class is correct. 
57 Sedan 2009 har EU-finansierade marknadskontrollprojekt finansierat butiksinspektioner och laboratorietester fr att kontrollera om produkter verensstmmer med kraven p ekodesign och energimrkning och om deras energiklass r korrekt.
The projects showed that non-compliance with the legislation is a significant issue. 
Projekten visade att bristande efterlevnad av lagstiftningen r ett stort problem.
The nature and level of non-compliance varies according to the type of product checked and the inspection method used (projectsŐ findings are shown in Figure 10). 
Typen och graden av bristande efterlevnad varierar beroende p vilken typ av produkt som kontrollerades och vilka inspektionsmetoder som anvndes (projektens slutsatser visas i figur 10).
Because these projects often targeted product models that were more likely to be non-compliant, the non-compliance rates presented below cannot be extrapolated to all product groups, or the EU market as a whole. 
Eftersom projekten ofta inriktades p produktmodeller dr det var mer sannolikt att de inte skulle uppfylla kraven, kan de niver p bristande efterlevnad som presenteras nedan inte extrapoleras till samtliga produktgrupper eller EU:s marknad som helhet.
32 Regulation (EC) 765/2008. 
32 Frordning (EG) nr 765/2008.
33 Joint-industry letter on Ecodesign, 2018. 29 
33 Joint-industry letter on Ecodesign, 2018. 31
Figure 10 Đ Findings of EU-funded projects 30 LEDs washing machines refrigerating appliances 0 % 10 % 20 % Non-compliant due to incorrect energy class Results of laboratory testing 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % Non-compliant for other reason (e.g. errors in documentation) 90 % Compliant 100 % 10 % 30 % 60 % 70 % 30 % 20 % 37 % 43 % 57 % were not labelled properly or at all 18 % 14 % products sold online products in shops Results of shop/online inspections 0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % Products with no labels at all Products with labels not properly displayed Compliant Source: ECA, based on the relevant EU-funded projectsŐ final reports. 
Figur 10 Đ Slutsatser frn EU-finansierade projekt 32 Resultat frn laboratorietester 10 % 30 % 60 % 70 % 30 % 20 % 37 % 43 % LED-lampor tvttmaskiner kylar och frysar 0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % Bristande efterlevnad p grund av felaktig energiklass 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % Bristande efterlevnad av andra skl (t.ex. felaktigheter i dokumentationen) 90 % Kraven uppfylls 100 % 57 % var inte ordentligt mrkta eller saknade mrkning 18 % 14 % produkter som sljs online produkter i butiker 0 % 10 % 20 % Produkter utan mrkningar Resultat av inspektioner i butiker/online 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % Produkter dr mrkningar inte visas ordentligt 80 % 90 % 100 % Kraven uppfylls Klla: Revisionsrtten, p grundval av slutrapporter frn relevanta EU-finansierade projekt.
58 Based on the results of the EU projects and additional data from Member States, the Commission estimated34 in 2019 that, overall, around 10-25 % of products sold on the market were non-compliant, leading to a decrease in energy savings of around 10 %. 
58 P grundval av resultaten frn EU-projekt och ytterligare uppgifter frn medlemsstaterna uppskattade kommissionen 201934 att totalt sett omkring 10Đ25 % av de produkter som sljs p marknaden inte uppfyllde kraven, vilket medfr minskade energibesparingar p omkring 10 %.
The Commission was unable to provide a breakdown of these figures. 
Kommissionen kunde inte tillhandahlla en uppdelning av dessa siffror.
This would be equivalent to the annual electricity consumptions of Sweden and Hungary combined. 
Detta skulle motsvara den rliga energifrbrukningen i Sverige och Ungern (tillsammans).
The estimated loss in energy saving due to non-compliance is 174.8 TWh/year by 2020, which roughly corresponds to the final electricity consumption of Sweden and Hungary combined, which is 170 TWh/year, based on Eurostat data from 2017. 
Den uppskattade frlusten nr det gller energibesparingar p grund av bristande efterlevnad uppgr till 174,8 TWh/r fram till 2020, vilket i grova drag motsvarar den slutliga elfrbrukningen i Sverige och Ungern tillsammans (170 TWh/r), baserat p Eurostats uppgifter frn 2017.
Another study by the Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (Defra) of the UK in 2011 estimated that impact35 of non-compliance by manufacturers and retailers on energy savings was 6.2 %, but cautioned that this was a very prudent estimate. 34 New energy efficiency labels explained, European Commission, 2019. 
I en annan studie frn ministeriet fr milj, livsmedel och landsbygdsfrgor (Defra) i Frenade kungariket 2011 uppskattades att effekten35 p energibesparingar p grund av bristande 34 Mer om de nya energietiketterna, Europeiska kommissionen, 2019.
35 Impact Assessment of the compliance & enforcement regime of the Energy-Using Products (EuP) & Energy Labelling Dir., Defra, 2009. 
35 Impact Assessment of the compliance & enforcement regime of the Energy-Using Products (EuP) & Energy Labelling Directives, Defra, 2009.
59 Effective enforcement of the regulation could help to reduce such losses. 
59 Ett ndamlsenligt genomfrande av frordningen skulle kunna bidra till att minska sdana frluster.
A study by a group of MSAs36 estimated, based on data collected from 2011 to 2013, that one euro invested in market surveillance led to Ű13 saved because of improved energy efficiency. 
I en studie som byggde p uppgifter frn 2011Đ2013 och gjordes av en grupp av marknadskontrollmyndigheter36, uppskattades att en euro som investerades i marknadskontroll ledde till besparingar p 13 euro tack vare frbttrad energieffektivitet.
It concluded that the return on investment was high enough to confirm that market surveillance could be cost-effective. 
Slutsatsen var att avkastningen p investeringarna var tillrckligt hg fr att bekrfta att marknadskontroll kan vara kostnadseffektiv.
For example, if market surveillance was performed optimally by all Nordic countries (Iceland, Finland, Norway, Sweden and Denmark), at an additional cost of Ű2.1 million, it would result in an annual energy saving of 168 GWh, which would save Ű28 million per year to consumers for the 13 product groups assessed. 
Om marknadskontroll utfrdes p ett optimalt stt av exempelvis alla nordiska lnder (Island, Finland, Norge, Sverige och Danmark), till en extra kostnad p 2,1 miljoner euro, skulle det leda till rliga energibesparingar p 168 GWh, vilket skulle spara in 28 miljoner euro per r fr konsumenterna nr det gller de 13 produktgrupper som bedmdes.
Another study37 estimated that the net benefit of a stronger market surveillance system would be around Ł164 million over a decade in the UK alone. 
I en annan studie37 uppskattades att nettofrdelarna med ett starkare marknadskontrollsystem skulle uppg till omkring 164 miljoner pund under ett rtionde enbart i Frenade kungariket.
Further studies have shown that market surveillance and testing can be done in a systematic, effective and cost-efficient way38. 
Ytterligare studier har visat att marknadskontroll och testning kan gras p ett systematiskt, ndamlsenligt och kostnadseffektivt stt38.
The EU has provided tools to support Market Surveillance Authorities that have had limited impact for Ecodesign and Energy Labelling 60 In order to improve the level of compliance with the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling legislation, MSA should conduct effective market surveillance. 
EU har tillhandahllit verktyg fr att stdja marknadskontrollmyndigheter, men verktygens inverkan p ekodesign och energimrkning har varit begrnsad 60 I syfte att frbttra nivn p efterlevnaden av lagstiftningen om ekodesign och energimrkning br marknadskontrollmyndigheter utfra en ndamlsenlig marknadskontroll.
Member States should establish, implement, and periodically update their market surveillance programmes and should communicate these programmes to the Commission. 
Medlemsstaterna br inrtta, genomfra och regelbundet uppdatera sina program fr marknadskontroll och underrtta kommissionen om dem.
37 Impact Assessment of the compliance & enforcement regime of the Energy-Using Products (EuP) & Energy Labelling Dir., Defra, 2009. 
37 Impact Assessment of the compliance & enforcement regime of the Energy-Using Products (EuP) & Energy Labelling Directives, Defra, 2009.
38 See, for example: ATLETE I, Appliance Testing for Energy Label Evaluation Publishable result-oriented report, 2011; ATLETE II, Appliance Testing for Washing Machines Energy Label & Ecodesign Evaluation, publishable result-oriented report, 2014. 31 
38 Se till exempel: ATLETE I, Appliance Testing for Energy Label Evaluation, Publishable result-oriented report, 2011, och ATLETE II, Appliance Testing for Washing Machines Energy Label & Ecodesign Evaluation, publishable result-oriented report, 2014.
61 According to reports submitted to the Commission, the number of products inspected each year ranges from fewer than 20 to more than 100 000 per year per Member State. 
61 Enligt de rapporter som lmnats till kommissionen varierar antalet produkter som inspekteras varje r frn frre n 20 till ver 100 000 per r per medlemsstat.
These figures are difficult to interpret, as the meaning of an ŇinspectionÓ is broad. 
Det r svrt att tolka dessa siffror eftersom innebrden av en ÓinspektionÓ r bred.
Depending on the Member State, an inspection can be either one or a combination of the following checks: Ń a visual inspection in a shop or online (e.g. to see if a label is displayed or to see if the product bears the ÔCEŐ marking); Ń documentary check of a product (e.g. to see if the product information sheet contains the appropriate references to the regulation and the technical information required); Ń a laboratory test of a product to check its compliance with Ecodesign requirements, such as its energy consumption and the accuracy of its label. 
Beroende p vilken medlemsstat det rr sig om kan en inspektion vara antingen en eller en kombination av fljande kontroller: Ń En visuell inspektion i en butik eller online (t.ex. fr att se om en mrkning visas eller om produkten r frsedd med CE-mrkning). Ń Dokumentkontroll av en produkt (t.ex. fr att se om produktinformationsbladet innehller lmpliga hnvisningar till frordningen och den tekniska information som krvs).
62 The different types of inspections serve different purposes. 
62 De olika inspektionstyperna har olika ndaml.
Checking the presence of labels in shops helps to ensure that consumers are properly informed about the performance of the product they wish to purchase. 
Kontroll av att mrkningar frekommer i butiker bidrar till att skerstlla att konsumenterna fr ordentlig information om prestandan hos den produkt de nskar kpa.
The energy-labelling policy cannot be effective if labels are not displayed. 
Energimrkningspolitiken kan inte vara ndamlsenlig om mrkningarna inte visas.
Documentary checks can detect non-compliance with information requirements and identify products that could require laboratory testing. 
Vid dokumentkontroller kan bristande efterlevnad av informationskrav upptckas och produkter som kan krva laboratorietester identifieras.
We found that the type and extent of inspections and documentary checks varied greatly across the Member States and authorities we visited, as shown in Box 3. 
Vi konstaterade att typ och omfattning av inspektioner och dokumentkontroller varierade mycket i de olika medlemsstater och myndigheter vi beskte, vilket visas i ruta 3.
32 Box 3 Shop inspections and documentary checks in four Member States In France, to check whether labels are properly displayed, the authority responsible for energy labelling inspect hundreds of shops across the country and online. 
34 Ruta 3 Butiksinspektioner och dokumentkontroller i fyra medlemsstater I Frankrike inspekterar den myndighet som br ansvaret fr energimrkning hundratals butiker i hela landet och online fr att kontrollera om mrkningarna visas ordentligt.
In contrast, the authority responsible for Ecodesign did not conduct any inspections. 
Dremot utfrde den myndighet som br ansvaret fr ekodesign inte ngra inspektioner.
In Sweden, in recent years, the MSA has focused its checks on the presence of energy labels on products sold online. 
I Sverige har marknadskontrollmyndigheten under de senaste ren inriktat kontrollerna p frekomsten av energimrkning p produkter som sljs online.
On the contrary, the Polish MSAs do not conduct any checks online, but inspect around 200 product models every year. 
De polska marknadskontrollmyndigheterna utfrde dremot inga kontroller online, men inspekterar omkring 200 produktmodeller varje r.
In Luxembourg, the MSA has conducted one inspection campaign in various shops across the country and their online shops, but only for washing machines. 
I Luxemburg har markandskontrollmyndigheten genomfrt en inspektionskampanj i olika butiker ver hela landet och deras onlinebutiker, men enbart fr tvttmaskiner.
63 In the CommissionŐs view, laboratory testing is the only way to verify whether a product meets energy efficiency and performance requirements, and if an energy label is correct39. 
63 Enligt kommissionen r laboratorietester det enda sttet att kontrollera om en produkt uppfyller energieffektivitets-och prestandakraven och om en energimrkning r korrekt39.
Testing can be expensive, depending on the product selected and the laboratory used, ranging from hundreds to thousands of euros per product. 
Tester kan vara dyra, beroende p den produkt som valts ut och det laboratorium som anvnds, och kosta frn hundratals till tusentals euro per produkt.
In many cases, MSAs purchase the product and pay for the laboratory test. 
I mnga fall kper marknadskontrollmyndigheter produkten och betalar fr laboratorietestet.
For expensive products, such as televisions, boilers, or fridges, this can become costly. 
Nr det gller dyra produkter, som tv-apparater, beredare och kylskp, kan det bli kostsamt.
We found that the number of laboratory tests performed also varied across MSAs we visited, as shown in Box 4. 
Vi konstaterade att ven antalet utfrda laboratorietester varierade bland de marknadskontrollmyndigheter vi beskte, vilket visas i ruta 4.
33 Box 4 Laboratory tests in four Member States The Swedish MSA operates its own in-house laboratory, and tests around 70 products of various types each year. 
35 Ruta 4 Laboratorietester i fyra medlemsstater Den svenska marknadskontrollmyndigheten har ett eget internt laboratorium och testar omkring 70 olika produkttyper varje r.
In Poland, the responsible MSA tests in its laboratory annually around 100 TVs, simple set-top boxes, computers, external power supplies, and household and office appliances (only for standby consumption), but no other type of product is routinely tested. 
I Polen testar den ansvariga marknadskontrollmyndigheten i sitt laboratorium rligen omkring 100 tv-apparater, enkla digitalboxar, datorer, externa ntaggregat och hushlls-och kontorsapparater (enbart frbrukning i vilolge), men inga andra produkttyper testas rutinmssigt.
In France, the MSA responsible for energy labels checks the energy class of less than 10 products in a laboratory each year. 
I Frankrike kontrollerar marknadskontrollmyndigheten med ansvar fr energimrkningar energiklassen fr frre n tio produkter i ett laboratorium varje r.
The authority responsible for Ecodesign does not perform any types of laboratory tests. 
Den myndighet som br ansvaret fr ekodesign utfr inga typer av laboratorietester.
In Luxembourg, the authority started to test products in 2018 and had tested 13 fridges by June 2019. 
I Luxemburg brjade myndigheten att testa produkter 2018 och hade i juni 2019 testat 13 kylskp.
64 Figure 11 shows an overview of laboratory tests performed by MSAs reported to the Commission for 2016. 
64 I figur 11 visas en versikt ver laboratorietester som utfrts av marknadskontrollmyndigheter och rapporterats till kommissionen fr 2016.
39 COM(2015) 345 final. 
39 COM(2015) 345 final.