natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When adopting the 1992 reform the Council fixed two objectives: ensure better market balances and compensate the loss of income caused by the reduction of the institutional prices. 
Nr rdet antog 1992 rs reform stllde det upp tv ml: att skapa bttre balans p marknaden och att kompensera fr inkomstbortfall som orsakas av snkta institutionella priser.
As regards compensation for the loss of income (see paragraph 9), the Commission did not evaluate the support scheme as it existed between 1992 and 1999 until November 2001, despite the significant amounts involved (approximately 2 400 million euro per year), when the Agenda 2000 changes were already being implemented. 
Nr det gller kompensationen fr inkomstbortfall (se punkt 9) gjorde kommissionen frst i november 2001 en utvrdering av stdsystemet som det sg ut mellan 1992 och 1999, trots att det handlar om s stora belopp (ungefr 2,4 miljarder euro per r), samtidigt som Agenda 2000-frndringarna hll p att genomfras.
The Council regulation adopting the Agenda 2000 reform requires the Commission to submit to the Council within two years a report on changes in the oilseeds market and, where appropriate, to propose amendments to the regulation (2). 
Enligt rdets frordning om antagande av Agenda 2000 skall kommissionen inom tv r lgga fram en rapport till rdet om hur marknaden fr oljefrn har utvecklats, och vid behov lgga fram frslag till ndringar av denna frordning (2).
Diversity of regionalisation plans due to the options available to the Member States 21. 
Skillnader mellan regionaliseringsplanerna p grund av medlemsstaternas valmjligheter 21.
The regional reference amount could be calculated, as the Member State chose, on the basis of historical average yields for either oilseeds or cereals. 
Medlemsstaten kunde vlja att berkna det regionala referensbeloppet p grundval av historisk avkastning fr antingen oljevxtfrn eller spannml.
For each region mentioned in its regionalisation plan the Member State stated, on the basis of appropriate objective criteria, which formula was to be used. 
Fr varje region som stod med i regionaliseringsplanen skulle medlemsstaten utifrn objektiva kriterier ange vilken berkningsgrund som skulle anvndas.
(1) Article 2 of the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 356, 2 31.12.1977, p. 
(1) Artikel 2 i budgetfrordningen av den 21 december 1977 fr Europeiska gemenskapernas allmnna budget (EGT L 356, 31.12.1977, 2 s.
1). () See Article 10(10) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1251/1999 of 17 May 1999 establishing a support scheme for producers of certain arable crops (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 1). 
1). () Se artikel 10.10 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 1251/1999 av den 17 maj 1999 om upprttande av ett stdsystem fr producenter av vissa jordbruksgrdor (EGT L 160, 26.6.1999, s.
In order to set the historical average yields for calculating the regional reference amounts each Member State drew up a regionalisation plan. 
I syfte att faststlla den historiska genomsnittsavkastningen fr berkning av regionala referensbelopp utarbetade varje medlemsstat en regionaliseringsplan.
For each production region the Member State provided detailed data relating to the areas and yields of cereals and oilseeds produced in the region over the five-year period 1986/87 to 1990/91 (3). 
Fr varje produktionsregion lmnade medlemsstaten detaljerade uppgifter om arealer och avkastning fr spannml och oljevxter som producerats i denna region under femrsperioden 1986/1987Đ1990/1991 (3).
A historical average yield for cereals, and for oilseeds where possible, had to be calculated separately for each region. 
En genomsnittsavkastning fr spannml och, om mjligt, fr oljevxter skulle berknas separat fr varje region.
The Commission was to examine the regionalisation plans presented by the Member States and ensure that each plan was based on appropriate objective criteria and was consistent with available historical data (4). 
Kommissionen skulle g igenom de regionaliseringsplaner medlemsstaterna lagt fram och se till att varje plan baserades p lmpliga objektiva kriterier och verensstmde med tillgngliga historiska uppgifter (4).
The Commission could object to plans which were not consistent with the aforementioned criteria, especially as regards the average yield in the Member State in question. 
Kommissionen kunde frkasta de planer som inte var frenliga med ovannmnda kriterier, framfr allt med genomsnittsavkastningen i den aktuella medlemsstaten.
There are three types of regionalisation plan: eight Member States (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom) elected to use the historical yields for oilseeds; four Member States (France, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain) opted to take the historical yields for cereals as their base; three Member States (Belgium, Italy and Sweden) presented regionalisation plans which contained a mixture of historical yields for oilseeds and for cereals. 
Det finns tre typer av regionaliseringsplaner: tta medlemsstater (Danmark, Tyskland, Grekland, Irland, Luxemburg, sterrike, Finland och Frenade kungariket) valde att bibehlla den historiska avkastningen fr oljevxtfrn; fyra medlemsstater (Spanien, Frankrike, Nederlnderna och Portugal) valde att utg frn den historiska avkastningen fr spannml; tre medlemsstater (Belgien, Italien och Sverige) lade fram en regionaliseringsplan med en blandning av historisk avkastning fr oljevxtfrn och spannml.
The number of production areas in a single Member State varies from one to 255. 
Antalet produktionszoner i en medlemsstat varierar frn en enda till 255.
Aware of the risks intrinsic to the considerable room for manoeuvre created by regionalisation, the Council has limited the payments per Member State (5). 
Rdet var medvetet om det stora manverutrymme som regionaliseringen skapat och begrnsade utbetalningarna per medlemsstat (5).
Unequal treatment of farmers in different Member States 25. 
Olika behandling av jordbrukare i olika medlemsstater 25.
The possibility given by the Council Regulation to Member States of choosing between historical cereal or historical oilseed yields (see paragraph 21) has created unequal treatment of farmers in different Member States. 
Den mjlighet som rdets frordning gett medlemsstaterna att vlja mellan historisk avkastning fr spannml och historisk avkastning fr oljevxter (se punkt 21) har medfrt att jordbrukare behandlas olika i olika medlemsstater.
In France and Spain, where historical cereal yields were used, the hectare aid was respectively 21,8 % and 25,1 % higher compared to the hectare aid based on historical oilseed yields. 
I Frankrike och Spanien, dr man anvnde historisk avkastning fr spannml, var arealstdet 21,8 % respektive 25,1 % hgre n det arealstd som baseras p historisk avkastning fr oljevxter.
The impact on the EU budget for the period 1992/93 to 1999/2000 is estimated by the Court at 1 245 million euro for France and 729 million euro for Spain (6). 
Revisionsrtten berknar att EU:s budget fr perioden 1992/1993 till 1999/2000 pverkades med 1 245 miljoner euro fr Frankrike och 729 miljoner euro fr Spanien (6).
(3) Article 3(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92. 
(3) Artikel 3.2 i rdets frordning (EEG) nr 1765/92.
(4) Article 3(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92. 
(4) Artikel 3.4 i rdets frordning (EEG) nr 1765/92.
(5) Article 1(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 231/94 of 24 January 1994 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 (OJ L 30, 3.2.1994, 6 p. 
(5) Artikel 1.4 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 231/94 av den 24 januari 1994 om ndring av frordning (EEG) nr 1765/92 (EGT L 30, 3.2.1994, 6 s.
2). () The impact is estimated by comparing the actual expenditure with the theoretical expenditure if the hectare aid in France and Spain were based on historical oilseed yields. 
2). () Pverkan berknas genom att man jmfr de faktiska utgifterna med de teoretiska utgifter som skulle bli fljden om arealstdet i Frankrike och Spanien baserades p historisk avkastning fr oljevxter.
22.10.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 254/9 Regional reference amounts leading to additional budgetary expenditure 26. 
22.10.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 254/9 Regionala referensbelopp som medfrt ytterligare budgetutgifter 26.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 (1) provides for the Commission to calculate the regional reference amounts on the basis of the Community reference amount as follows: (a) the observed reference price is substituted for the projected reference price; no account shall be taken of price variations within 8 % of the projected reference price; (b) for each production region the aid is adjusted according to the historical yields for oilseeds or cereals indicated in the regionalisation plan; (c) where appropriate, the calculation takes into account any reductions applied as a result of the maximum guaranteed area being exceeded during the current or the previous year. 
Enligt rdets frordning (EEG) nr 1765/92 (1) skall kommissionen berkna de regionala referensbeloppen p grundval av referensbeloppet fr gemenskapen p fljande stt: a) Det prognostiserade referenspriset erstts med det konstaterade referenspriset. Prisvariationer inom 8 % av det prognostiserade referenspriset skall inte beaktas. b) Fr varje produktionsregion skall stdet justeras utifrn den historiska genomsnittsavkastning fr oljevxter eller spannml i regionen som str i regionaliseringsplanen. c) Berkningen skall vid behov innefatta minskningar som gjorts fr att den garanterade maximiarealen verskridits under det innevarande eller fregende budgetret.
EU regulations stipulate that the Commission shall calculate the observed reference price. 
Enligt EU:s frordningar skall kommissionen berkna det konstaterade referenspriset.
This price has to be based on prices and offers on representative Community markets. 
Detta pris skall baseras p priser och erbjudanden p representativa gemenskapsmarknader.
Seven Member States periodically report to the Commission the prices on their markets for colza and rape seed, sunflower seed and bulk soya beans. 
Sju medlemsstater rapporterar regelbundet till gemenskapen priserna frn marknaderna fr raps och rybs, solrosfr och sojabnor i bulk.
The CourtŐs audit of the calculation of the observed reference prices and the regional reference amounts leads to the following observations, of which the Commission was aware, though it did not take any steps to change things. (a) The final regional reference amount was to be determined by the Commission before 30 January in each marketing year. 
Vid sin granskning av berkningen av de konstaterade referenspriserna och de regionala referensbeloppen har revisionsrtten kommit fram till fljande iakttagelser om problem som kommissionen r medveten om men inte har vidtagit ngra tgrder fr att avhjlpa: a) Det slutliga regionala referensbeloppet skulle faststllas av kommissionen fre den 30 januari varje regleringsr.
Consequently, the calculation of the observed reference price and the weighting coefficients did not take into account the prices of February to June although 30 % to 40 % of the harvest is contracted in that period. 
Fljaktligen ingick inte priserna i februariĐjuni i berkningen av det konstaterade referenspriset och viktkoefficienter trots att 30Đ40 % av skrden sljs under den perioden.
The prices of these months were not even taken into account for the calculation of the observed reference price of the following marketing year (2). 
Priserna fr dessa mnader ingick inte ens i berkningen av det konstaterade referenspriset fr pfljande regleringsr (2).
For France for example, the average market price for the marketing years 1993/94 until 1998/99 in those months was 1,91 % higher than in the other months due to storage costs. 
Fr Frankrike var exempelvis det genomsnittliga marknadspriset fr regleringsren 1993/1994 till 1998/1999 under de mnaderna 1,91 % hgre n under vriga mnader p grund av lagringskostnader.
Omitting the higher prices leads to fixing higher aids. 
Om de hgre priserna inte tas med leder det till att hgre bidrag faststlls.
The Court estimates the resulting additional costs to the EU bud-1 (2) Article 5(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92. () A ruling by the Court of Justice of 7 March 2002 (C-328/00) confirms the CommissionŐs discretionary powers in applying the calculation method to a reference period of seven months. 
Revisionsrtten uppskattar att detta lett till ytterligare kostnader fr EU:s budget med 1 (2) Artikel 5.1 i rdets frordning (EEG) nr 1765/92. () I en dom frn domstolen av den 7 mars 2002 (CĐ328/00) bekrftas kommissionens befogenhet att gra sknsmssiga bedmningar nr berkningsmetoden tillmpas p en referensperiod p sju mnader.
This ruling concerns only the legality of the CommissionŐs decision; it does not cover the sound financial management aspect. get at a total of 130 million euro for the marketing years 1993/94 to 1999/2000 (3). (b) In its annual aid adjustment calculation, the Commission rounded the difference between the observed reference price and the projected reference price to the lower percentage point, although this was not provided for by the regulation (1). 
Domen behandlar enbart lagligheten i kommissionens beslut. Den berr inte frgan om sund ekonomisk frvaltning. b) c) d) totalt 130 miljoner euro fr regleringsren 1993/1994 till 1999/2000 (3).
This rounding increased Community expenditure by 95 million euro between 1992/93 and 1999/2000 (4). (c) Additionally, in its annual aid calculation, the Commission systematically used a formula that was different from the formula in the Council regulation adopting the new regime in 1992. 
Vid sin rliga justeringsberkning avrundade kommissionen skillnaden mellan det konstaterade referenspriset och det prognostiserade referenspriset till den lgre procentsatsen trots att detta inte freskrivs i frordningen (1). P grund av denna avrundning kade gemenskapens utgifter med 95 miljoner euro mellan 1992/1993 och 1999/2000 (4).
The use of a different formula increased the aid. 
Anvndningen av en annan formel ledde till en kning av stdet.
The additional cost to the EU budget between 1992/93 and 1999/ 2000 amounts to 90 million euro (5). (d) The Commission could not produce evidence to show that, during missions to Member States, either itself or the Member States, at any time, checked price quotations to verify if they represented real prices for delivery to a centre of demand, e.g. a crusher. 
Den ytterligare kostnaden fr EU:s budget mellan 1992/1993 och 1999/2000 uppgr till 90 miljoner euro (5). Kommissionen kunde inte tillhandahlla ngra bevis fr att kommissionen sjlv Đ vid sina besk i medlemsstaterna Đ eller medlemsstaterna vid ngon tidpunkt kontrollerade prisuppgifterna fr att skerstlla att de utgjorde faktiska priser fr leverans till ett efterfrgecentrum, till exempel en krossnings-anlggning.
In Italy for instance, the prices sent to the Commission were prices quoted on the four major commodity exchanges. 
I Italien var exempelvis de priser som skickats till kommissionen prisnoteringar p de fyra strsta rvarubr-serna.
The prices quoted on the Italian commodity exchanges are prices paid to farmers. 
Prisnoteringar p den italienska rvarubrsen avser de priser som betalas till jordbrukarna.
Following a mission to Italy the Commission decided to make a correction for the transport costs. 
Efter ett besk i Italien beslutade kommissionen att en korrigering skulle gras fr transportkostnaderna.
No correction was made for the collection costs, which vary between 10 euro and 13 euro per tonne. 
Ingen korrigering gjordes fr uppsamlingskostnaderna vilka varierar mellan 10 och 13 euro per ton.
This amount explains the differences observed between prices communicated by Italy and the other Member States. 
Detta belopp frklarar de skillnader som konstaterats mellan de priser som rapporterats av Italien och vriga medlemsstater.
The Italian prices have a weighting of 19 % for determining the observed reference price as calculated by the Commission. 
Fr de italienska priserna anvnds en viktning p 19 % fr faststllande av det konstaterade referenspriset ssom det berknas av kommissionen.
Consequently, the observed reference price as calculated by the Commission was too low. 
Fljaktligen var det konstaterade referenspriset ssom det berknades av kommissionen alltfr lgt.
The additional charge to the EU budget for 1997/98 and 1998/99 can be estimated at 51,8 million euro (6). 
Den ytterligare belastningen fr EU:s budget fr 1997/1998 och 1998/1999 kan uppskattas till 51,8 miljoner euro (6). verkompensationen berknas genom att man jmfr faktiska utgifter med de teoretiska utgifter som skulle bli fljden om det konstaterade referenspriset skulle berknas p 12 mnader, dvs. frn juli till juni.
(3) The overcompensation is estimated by comparing the actual expenditure with the theoretical expenditure if the observed reference price was calculated on the basis of 12 months, i.e. from July to June. 
Utgiftskningen berknas genom att man jmfr de faktiska utgifterna med de teoretiska utgifter som skulle bli fljden om skillnaden i procent mellan det konstaterade och det prognostiserade referenspriset inte avrundades.
The calculation made by the Commission corrected the hectare aid for the difference expressed as a percentage between the 6 observed and the historical reference price. () The additional charge is estimated by comparing the actual expenditure with the theoretical expenditure if the collection costs were added to the market prices communicated by Italy. 
I kommissionens berkning korrigerades arealstdet fr skillnaden mellan det konstaterade och det historiska referenspriset uttryckt i procent. Den ytterligare kostnaden berknas genom att man jmfr faktiska utgifter med de teoretiska utgifter som skulle bli fljden om man skulle lgga till uppsamlingskostnaderna till de marknadspriser som Italien meddelat.
C 254/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22.10.2002 28. 
C 254/10 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 22.10.2002 28.
As the additional expenditure mentioned in paragraph 27 is the result of decisions by the Commission, recovering funds from the Member States or from beneficiaries is no longer possible, given the legal principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty. 
Mot bakgrund av att de ytterligare utgifter som syftas i punkt 27 beror p kommissionsbeslut kan de inte lngre krvas in frn medlemsstaterna eller stdmottagarna, med hnsyn till rttsprinciper som skydd av berttigade frvntningar och rttsskerhet.
Regionalisation plans containing overstated historical yields 29. 
Regionaliseringsplaner med verskattad historisk avkastning 29.
Initsannualreportconcerningthefinancialyear1996(1), the Court examined the yields mentioned in some of the regionalisation plans. 
I samband med sin rsrapport fr budgetret 1996 (1) granskade revisionsrtten den avkastning som angavs i vissa regiona-liseringsplaner.
It had observed overstated average yields in the German regionalisation plan for oilseeds (2) and in the French and Spanish regionalisation plans for cereals (3). 
Revisionsrtten fann fall dr genomsnittsavkastningen versteg den som fastslagits i gemenskapslagstiftningen, i framfr allt den tyska regionaliseringsplanen fr oljevxtfrn (2) och i de franska och spanska regionaliseringsplanerna fr spannml (3).
Historical average yields were overstated in two other regionalisation plans: (a) for the establishment of the Portuguese regionalisation plan, Council Regulation (EEC) No 1765/92 refers to the data provided by Portugal under Regulation (EEC) No 3653/90 (4). 
Den historiska avkastningen r verskattad i tv andra regionaliseringsplaner: a) Fr upprttandet av den portugisiska regionaliseringsplanen hnvisar man i rdets frordning (EEG) nr 1765/92 till de uppgifter som Portugal lmnat i enlighet med frordning (EEG) nr 3653/90 (4).
Analysis of these data gives a weighted average yield of 2,5 t/ha. 
En analys av dessa uppgifter ger en vgd genomsnittsavkastning p 2,5 t/ha.
The Commission authorised Portugal to use a weighted average yield of 2,9 t/ha, which is equivalent to an increase of 16%overtheyielddefinedbytheregulations; (b) the Italian regionalisation plan also contains overstated yields. 
Kommissionen gav Portugal tillstnd att anvnda en vgd genomsnittsavkastning p 2,9 t/ha vilket motsvarar en kning med 16 % i frhllande till avkastningen som den definieras i frordningen. b) Den italienska regionaliseringsplanen innehller ocks alltfr hg avkastning.
Over the reference period 1986 to 1990 approximately 20 % of the oilseed produced in Italy was, in fact, from areas of land that produced two crops per year, first cereals and then soya beans. 
Under referensperioden 1986 till 1990 kom ungefr 20 % av de oljevxtfrn som producerats i Italien frn arealer med tv skrdar om ret: frst spannml och sedan sojabnor.
For the purpose of calculating historical average oilseed yields, the Italian authorities took account of total oilseed production, including production from areas yielding two crops a year. 
Nr de italienska myndigheterna berknade sin historiska genomsnittsavkastning fr oljevxter rknade de med den totala produktionen av oljevxter inklusive den som kom frn arealer som gav tv skrdar om ret.
On that basis, the Italian authorities reported to the Commission a weighted average yield of 3,74 tonnes per hectare for oilseed. 
P s stt meddelade de italienska myndigheterna kommissionen att den vgda genomsnittsavkastningen var 3,74 ton per hektar fr oljevxtfrn.
However, the real average yieldforoilseedsintheperiod1986to1990wasonly3,07t/ ha (5). 
Den verkliga genomsnittsavkastningen fr oljevxtfrn under perioden 1986Đ1990 var dock endast 3,07 t/ha (5).
When informed of this method of calculation, the Commission told the Italian authorities that it would challenge neither the method itself nor the results produced by it. 
Efter att ha informerats om berkningsmetoden lovade kommissionen de italienska myndigheterna att varken ifrgastta sjlva metoden eller resultaten av den.
1 (2) OJ C 348,18.11.1997, p. 
1 (2) EGT C 348, 18.11.1997, s.
70. () Paragraph 3.23 of the annual report concerning the financial year 3 1996. () Paragraph 3.22 of the annual report concerning the financial year 4 1996. () Council Regulation (EEC) No 3650/90 of 11 December 1990 on measures to strengthen the application of the common quality standards 5 for fruit and vegetables in Portugal (OJ L 362, 27.12.1990, p. 
70. (3) Punkt 3.23 i rsrapporten fr budgetret 1996. (4) Punkt 3.22 i rsrapporten fr budgetret 1996. () Rdets frordning (EEG) nr 3653/90 av den 11 december 1990 om vergngsbestmmelser betrffande den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr spannml och ris i Portugal (EGT L 362, 5 27.12.1990, s.
22). () Source: Eurostat Ń ÔNew CronosŐ statistics. 
22). () Klla: Eurostat Đ New Cronos.
The Court estimates that the total financial impact of the observations set out in paragraphs 29 and 30 was a charge to the Community budget of 729,3 million euro of expenditure over the period 1993 to 1999, i.e. 474,7 million euro for oilseeds and 254,6 million euro for cereals (6). 
Revisionsrtten uppskattar de ekonomiska konsekvenserna av iakttagelserna i punkt 29 och 30 till 729,3 miljoner euro i utgifter som belastar gemenskapens budget under perioden 1993Đ1999, nmligen 474,7 miljoner euro fr oljevxtfrn och 254,6 fr spannml (6).
As this expenditure is the result of regionalisation plans accepted by the Commission, it can no longer be recovered from the Member States or from beneficiaries in view of the legal principles cited in paragraph 28. 
Mot bakgrund av att dessa utgifter r resultatet av regionaliseringsplaner som kommissionen godtagit, kan de inte lngre krvas in frn medlemsstaterna eller stdmottagarna, med hnsyn till de rttsprinciper som nmns i punkt 28.