natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX), developed by two private organisations with AMIF funding, also allows a comparison between Member States and other countries by providing an evaluation of their integration policies58. 
MIPEX (Migrant Integration Policy Index [index fr politiken fr integration av migranter]) har tagits fram av tv privata organisationer med Amif-medel och gr det ocks mjligt att jmfra medlemsstater och andra lnder genom en utvrdering av deras integrationspolitik58.
At national level, the reports of the SAIs that we reviewed highlight that there is insufficient information on integration measures. 
P nationell niv understrks i de rapporter frn nationella revisionsorgan som vi gick igenom att det inte finns tillrckligt med information om integrationstgrder.
This is because indicators to measure integration are absent or inadequate (six reports in four Member States); and because of the collection of inadequate or incomplete data (15 reports in 12 Member States). 
Det beror dels p att det saknas indikatorer fr att mta integration eller p att indikatorerna r olmpliga (sex rapporter frn fyra medlemsstater), dels p att olmpliga eller ofullstndiga uppgifter samlas in (15 rapporter frn tolv medlemsstater).
In addition, in the context of the Urban Agenda initiative59, weaknesses were reported in setting evidence-based integration policies in the cities60. 
Inom ramen fr initiativet En EU-agenda fr stder59 rapporterades dessutom om brister vid faststllandet av evidensbaserad integrationspolitik i stderna60.
According to our survey, most Member States either partially know (18) or do not know (four) the number of migrants supported by integration measures and the corresponding amount spent. 
Enligt vr enkt hade de flesta medlemsstaterna antingen bara delvis (18) eller ingen (fyra) information om antalet migranter som fick std i form av integrationstgrder och det belopp som gick till detta ndaml.
None of the Member States that replied to our survey were able to provide a breakdown by groups of migrants (e.g. refugees, family reunification, etc.) for all EU and national funds. 
Ingen medlemsstat som svarade p vr enkt kunde tillhandahlla en uppdelning per migrantgrupp (t.ex. flyktingar eller familjeterfrening) fr samtliga EU-medel och nationella medel.
In terms of EU funds, the 2014-2020 EU legislative framework for AMIF, ESIF and FEAD does not require Member States to specifically monitor the outcomes (i.e. results, impact) of integration measures on migrants. 
Nr det gller EU-medel innehller EU:s rttsliga ram fr 2014Đ2020 och Amif, ESI-fonderna och Fead inga krav p att medlemsstaterna specifikt ska vervaka utfallet (dvs. resultat och effekter) av integrationstgrder fr migranter.
In practice, this also means that, with the exceptions of AMIF, the Commission does not have a comprehensive overview of the measures that Member States are implementing to support migrants. 
I praktiken innebr det ocks att kommissionen, med undantag fr Amif, inte har en samlad bild av de tgrder som medlemsstaterna genomfr fr att stdja migranter.
The following monitoring arrangements apply to each fund: - The AMIF specifically requires Member States to collect annual information on the number of migrants supported, but not on the extent of the integration achieved (e.g. if language was learnt, if a job was found, etc.). 
Fljande vervakningsarrangemang gller fr varje fond: - Fr Amif krvs det specifikt att medlemsstaterna samlar in rlig information om det antal migranter som har ftt std, men inte om i vilken mn tgrden ledde till integration (t.ex. om migranten lrde sig sprket eller fick jobb).
The outcomes of the measures supported by AMIF will be evaluated through ex-post evaluation reports by the end of 202361. 
Utfallet av de tgrder som stds genom Amif kommer att utvrderas i efterhandsutvrderingsrapporter i slutet av 202361.
At the end of 2017, expenditure was low (an average of 16 %, with two Member States not spending at all). 
I slutet av 2017 var utgifterna lga (i genomsnitt 16 %, med tv medlemsstater som inte hade ngra utgifter).
However, at the end of 201762, about 30 % of AMIF integration targets in terms of the number of migrants supported had been achieved63, with four Member States already exceeding their targets for 2020. - The ESF/YEI includes migrants within the target group 'migrants, participants with a foreign background, minorities' (for reporting on outputs) and within 'disadvantaged participants' (for reporting on results). 
Men i slutet av 201762 hade omkring 30 % av Amifs integrationsml i form av antalet migranter som fick std uppntts63, och fyra medlemsstater hade redan vertrffat sina ml fr 2020. - ESF/ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet tar med migranter i mlgruppen Ómigranter, deltagare med utlndsk bakgrund och minoriteterÓ (fr rapporteringen om output) och i Ómissgynnade deltagareÓ (fr rapporteringen om resultat).
Therefore, the available indicators cannot provide information on the outcomes of measures specifically for migrants. 
De tillgngliga indikatorerna kan drfr inte ge information om tgrdernas utfall specifikt fr migranterna.
Moreover, Member States may decide not to collect data on a systematic basis for reasons of personal data protection64. 26 
Medlemsstater kan dessutom besluta att inte systematiskt samla in uppgifter beroende p skyddet av personuppgifter64. - Eruf och EHFF har fr nrvarande inga specifika indikatorer som gller migranter.
For ERDF, in 2016 the Commission proposed to add a new specific investment priority for migrants and refugees, as well as new dedicated indicators65, some of which specifically measure the number of migrants supported. 
Nr det gller Eruf freslog kommissionen 2016 att en ny, specifik investeringsprioritering fr migranter och flyktingar skulle lggas till, tillsammans med nya specifika indikatorer65, varav ngra srskilt mter antalet migranter som fr std.
These initiatives should facilitate the development of an evidence-based policy making. - For the EAFRD, since 2016, Member States have been requested to identify and report on the cases where an operation can potentially contribute to the integration of migrants66. - The FEAD may also include migrants (depending on how the Member State defines the target group). 
Dessa initiativ br underltta framvxten av ett evidensbaserat beslutsfattande. - Nr det gller Ejflu anmodas medlemsstaterna sedan 2016 att identifiera och rapportera om de fall dr en insats skulle kunna bidra till integration av migranter66. - Fead fr ocks innefatta migranter (beroende p hur medlemsstaten definierar mlgruppen).
Here, the data is determined based on 'informed estimations of the partner organisations rather than information provided by end-recipients'67. 
Hr faststlls uppgifterna p grundval av Óen vlgrundad uppskattning gjord av partnerorganisationerna och inte p information frn slutmottagareÓ67.
In our 2016 annual report68, we reported weaknesses in the monitoring systems of the two Member States that we examined concerning the AMIF. Monitoring is also the area where the SAIs find most issues. 
I vr rsrapport om 201668 rapporterade vi om brister i vervakningssystemen i de tv medlemsstater dr vi granskade Amif. vervakning r ocks det omrde dr de nationella revisionsorganen hittar flest problem.
These include weaknesses in the following areas: - monitoring provisions (eight reports related to eight Member States); - IT systems (three reports for three Member States); - monitoring visits (four reports for three Member States); - evaluation of measures (eight reports for six Member States); - reporting of results (four reports for four Member States); - reporting in general (10 reports for six Member States). 
Bland annat finns brister inom fljande omrden: - vervakningsbestmmelser (tta rapporter om tta medlemsstater). - It-system (tre rapporter om tre medlemsstater). - vervakningsbesk (fyra rapporter om tre medlemsstater). - Utvrdering av tgrder (tta rapporter om sex medlemsstater). - Resultatrapportering (fyra rapporter om fyra medlemsstater). - Rapportering generellt (tio rapporter om sex medlemsstater).
Synergies and complementarity depend on the effectiveness of EU and national coordination EU funds are not always mutually exclusive 48. 
Synergier och komplementaritet r beroende av att samordningen mellan EU och medlemsstaten r ndamlsenlig EU-fonder r inte alltid msesidigt uteslutande 48.
The same type of action for the same target group may be financed under different EU funds (see Annex VII). 
Samma typ av tgrd fr samma mlgrupp kan finansieras inom olika EU-fonder (se bilaga VII).
To ensure the coordination and complementarity between the EU funds, the AMIF regulation69 and the ESIF regulatory framework70 require Member States to detail, in their programming documents, the mechanisms by which they plan to coordinate the different EU and national instruments. 
Fr att se till att EU-fonderna r samordnade och kompletterar varandra freskrivs i Amif-frordningen69 och lagstiftningsramen fr ESI-fonderna70 att medlemsstaterna i sina programdokument redovisar vilka mekanismer de tnker anvnda fr att samordna de olika EU-instrumenten och nationella instrumenten.
SAI reports in three Member States identified the risk of overlaps and, in one case the SAI reported the existence of double funding. 
I rapporterna frn de nationella revisionsorganen i tre medlemsstater identifierades risken fr verlappningar och i ett fall rapporterade det nationella revisionsorganet att dubbelfinansiering frekom.
Besides legislative arrangements, the Commission also has an internal governance structure for coordination in place. 
Frutom lagstiftning har kommissionen ocks infrt en intern styrstruktur fr samordning.
Commission staff review all EU programmes through an inter-service consultation process before their adoption. 
Kommissionens personal gr igenom alla EU-program innan de antas genom en process fr samrd mellan kommissionens avdelningar.
In response to the increase in inward migration, the Commission also set up, in November 2015, an Inter-Service Group on the integration of migrants, comprising staff from different Commission Directorates-General. 
Som en reaktion p den kade invandringen inrttade kommissionen i november 2015 ocks en avdelningsvergripande grupp om integration av migranter med personal frn olika generaldirektorat.
In a previous audit we found that significant overlaps existed between the European Integration Fund, AMIF’s predecessor, and ESF71. 
Vid en tidigare revision fann vi att det fanns stora verlappningar mellan Europeiska fonden fr integration, fregngaren till Amif, och ESF71.
Apart from an increased risk of double-funding, overlaps cause additional costs (e.g. staff costs) and potential synergies are lost. 
Utver en kad risk fr dubbelfinansiering leder verlappningar till extra kostnader (t.ex. personalkostnader), och potentiella synergieffekter gr frlorade.
According to the Commission, to minimize these risks, the AMIF legal basis for the current 2014-2020 programme period has been adjusted. 
Enligt kommissionen har Amifs rttsliga grund fr den pgende programperioden 2014Đ2020 justerats fr att minimera dessa risker.
In addition, the Commission carried out a policy dialogue with the Member States and reviewed programmes internally before adopting them. 
Kommissionen frde ocks en policydialog med medlemsstaterna och gick igenom programmen internt innan de antogs.
In 2015 the Commission also published two notes72 clarifying the differences between funds and guiding Member States on how best to achieve 28 Volunteering was rewarding, but Leila wanted to do more. 
Kommissionen offentliggjorde 2015 ocks tv meddelanden72 dr skillnaderna mellan fonderna frtydligades och medlemsstaterna fick vgledning om hur man bst uppnr komplementaritet och synergier.
The Commission also held conferences and workshops73 and set up networks74 with national authorities to explain how funds can be used. 
Kommissionen anordnade ocks konferenser och workshoppar73 och upprttade ntverk74 med nationella myndigheter fr att frklara hur fonderna kan anvndas.
In January 2018, the Commission published a toolkit on the use of EU Funds75. 
I januari 2018 offentliggjorde kommissionen en verktygslda om anvndningen av EU-fonder75.
Moreover, as part of the AMIF mid-term review process, the Commission required Member States76 to evaluate the complementarity of AMIF with other relevant EU funds. 
Som en del av halvtidsversynen av Amif begrde kommissionen dessutom att medlemsstaterna76 skulle utvrdera Amifs komplementaritet med andra relevanta EU-fonder.
However, the Council, in its conclusions on cohesion policy post-202077, requested that the Commission 'carry out a careful analysis of complementarities and overlaps between EU instruments in preparation for the period post-2020 in view of enhancing synergies between them', stressing that all EU budget instruments should complement each other. 
I sina slutsatser om sammanhllningspolitiken efter 202077 uppmanade dock rdet kommissionen att Ósom frberedelse infr perioden efter 2020 noggrant analysera komplementaritet och verlappningar mellan EU:s instrument i syfte att ka synergierna mellan instrumentenÓ och understrk att alla EU:s budgetinstrument br komplettera varandra.
Member States are responsible for implementing effective coordination mechanisms 52. 
Medlemsstaterna ansvarar fr att infra ndamlsenliga samordningsmekanismer 52.
Member States are responsible for deciding which funds to use, ensuring they are used in a coherent way - exploiting the scope for synergies and preventing double funding. 
Medlemsstaterna har ansvaret fr att besluta vilka fonder som ska anvndas, se till att de anvnds konsekvent och utnyttja mjligheten till synergier och frhindra 30 dubbelfinansiering.
In our survey, 23 Member States78 said that they had a body coordinating the different organisations responsible for the integration of migrants. 
I vr enkt svarade 23 medlemsstater78 att de hade ett organ som samordnade de olika organisationerna som ansvarade fr integrationen av migranter.
However, the SAI reports that we reviewed identified weaknesses in the coordination mechanisms of eight of those 23 Member States. 
Men i de rapporter frn nationella revisionsorgan som vi gick igenom identifierades brister i samordningsmekanismerna i tta av dessa 23 medlemsstater.
Moreover, only three Member States reported that they had issued guidance on coordination. 
Vidare rapporterade endast tre medlemsstater att de hade gett ut vgledning om samordning.
This indicates that there is a risk of loss of synergies and complementarity even in cases where a coordination body is in place. 
Det tyder p att det finns en risk fr att synergier och komplementaritet gr frlorade ven nr det finns ett samordningsorgan.
The need for a strong national leadership role is particularly important given the multi-level governance structure required by the funds that can be used for integration, involving different bodies and responsibilities. 
Behovet av en stark nationell ledarskapsroll r srskilt viktig med tanke p den styrstruktur med flera niver som krvs fr de fonder som kan anvndas fr integration, och dr olika organ och ansvarsomrden r berrda.
We calculated that there are over 400 different organisations involved in managing measures financed from EU funds for the integration of migrants in the 2014-2020 programme period and an additional 500 bodies in Cohesion policy alone implementing the funds (ESF/ YEI, ERDF and CF)79. 
Vi kom fram till att ver 400 olika organisationer deltar i frvaltningen av tgrder som finansieras av EU-fonder fr integrationen av migranter under programperioden 2014Đ2020, och att ytterligare 500 organ enbart inom sammanhllningspolitiken genomfr fonderna (ESF/ungdomssysselsttningsinitiativet, Eruf och Sammanhllningsfonden)79.
With the aim of streamlining the rules applicable to the ESIF, the Commission proposed a revision to the funds’ regulations as part of the mid-term review of the EU's multiannual financial framework 2014-2020. 
I syfte att rationalisera reglerna fr ESI-fonderna freslog kommissionen att fondernas frordningar ndras i samband med halvtidsversynen av EU:s flerriga budgetram 2014Đ2020.
In November 2017, the Council called the Commission to simplify the cohesion policy and the ESIF for post-202077. 
I november 2017 uppmanade rdet kommissionen att frenkla sammanhllningspolitiken och ESI-fonderna fr tiden efter 202077.
At the national level, there needs to be coordination not only between the organisations dealing with the different funds (including national funds), but also between the different layers of implementation (from national authorities at national/ regional level to intermediary bodies at municipal/ local level). 
P nationell niv mste samordning ske inte bara mellan de organisationer som har kontakt med de olika fonderna (dribland nationella fonder) utan ven mellan de olika genomfrandeniverna (frn nationella myndigheter p nationell/regional niv till frmedlande organ p kommunal/lokal niv).
An analysis performed in the context of the Urban Agenda (see paragraph 45), shows that cities in general cannot access, or only have limited access to, integration funding because, under the ESIF or AMIF, funds are channelled through national or regional authorities82. 
En analys som gjordes i anslutning till agendan fr stder (se punkt 45) visade att stder i allmnhet inte fr tillgng, eller fr endast begrnsad tillgng, till medel fr integration eftersom medel inom ESI-fonderna eller Amif gr via nationella eller regionala myndigheter82.
Difficulties in accessing funds for the integration of migrants were also reported by the SAIs (seven reports in six Member States). 
Svrigheter att f tillgng till medel fr integration av migranter rapporterades ocks av de nationella revisionsorganen (sju rapporter i sex medlemsstater).
The other organisations that we interviewed reported that the distribution of funds from national/ regional authorities to beneficiaries is not always very transparent. 
De andra organisationerna som vi intervjuade rapporterade att det inte alltid ges mycket insyn i de nationella/regionala myndigheternas frdelning av 31
This was also highlighted by six SAIs in seven reports. 
Det betonades ocks av sex nationella revisionsorgan i sju rapporter.
CONCLUDING COMMENTS 55. 
AVSLUTANDE ANMRKNINGAR 55.
Integration is 'a dynamic, long term, and continuous two-way process’ involving both migrants and the receiving society. 
Integration r Óen dynamisk, lngsiktig, kontinuerlig och dubbelriktad processÓ dr bde migranter och det mottagande samhllet deltar.
Integrating migrants in their new societies within the EU is not easy, particularly given the significant increase in migrants in the last decade. 
Integrationen av migranter i deras nya samhllen i EU r inte enkelt, i synnerhet mot bakgrund av den kraftiga kningen av antalet migranter under de senaste tio ren.
However, it is a task that the Union has committed itself to tackling, and effective integration has a number of potential economic, social and fiscal benefits for the countries where migrants settle (see paragraph 6). 
Det r emellertid en uppgift som EU har tagit sig att lsa, och en effektiv integration har ett antal potentiella ekonomiska, sociala och statsfinansiella frdelar fr de lnder dr migranter bostter sig (se punkt 6).
In this document, we have set out the main issues relating to the integration of migrants, and have highlighted seven key challenges: - Reducing delays in the start of integration process - Guaranteeing equal rights and non-discrimination - Sound and comprehensive assessment of needs and funding - Commitment of Member States to implement the Action Plan 30 Challenge 7: Effective coordination of funding at EU and national level Without effective coordination at EU and national level, there is the risk that the complexity of funding arrangements may lead to inefficient policy implementation (less complementarity, fewer synergies, difficulties in accessing funds, risk of double funding). 
I detta dokument har vi pekat p de stora problem som pverkar integrationen av migranter och lyft fram fljande sju centrala utmaningar: Đ Minska frdrjningarna av starten p integrationsprocessen Đ Garantera lika rttigheter och icke-diskriminering Đ Gra en grundlig och heltckande bedmning av behov och finansiering Đ Medlemsstaternas engagemang fr att genomfra handlingsplanen Đ Stdja alla migranter inom alla relevanta politikomrden Đ ndamlsenligt vervaka utfallet av integration fr att mta framsteg och anpassa politiken vid behov Đ ndamlsenligt samordna p EU-niv och nationell niv 57.
Meeting these challenges will require effective, coordinated efforts on the part of all those involved: EU institutions, national, regional and local governments - as well as other agencies and voluntary organisations. 
Fr att mta dessa utmaningar mste alla som r involverade gra ndamlsenliga och samordnade anstrngningar: EU-institutioner, nationella, regionala och lokala myndigheter Đ liksom andra organ och frivilligorganisationer.
This action is needed to give meaning to the words of the Treaty on European Union, Article 2 of which states that ‘The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality ... and respect for human rights’. 
fr mnniskans vrdighet, frihet, demokrati, jmlikhet [...] och respekt fr de mnskliga rttigheternaÓ.
This Briefing Paper was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mrs Iliana IVANOVA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 25 April 2018. 
Detta briefingdokument antogs av avdelning II, med ledamoten Iliana Ivanova som ordfrande, vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 25 april 2018.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President 31 
Fr revisionsrtten Klaus-Heiner Lehne ordfrande 33
Annex I Glossary Migration related terminology: migrants, refugees and asylum seekers are not the same 1 The terms migrant, refugee and asylum seeker are not synonyms. 
Ordfrklaringar Bilaga I 1 Migrationsrelaterad terminologi: migranter, flyktingar och asylskande betyder inte samma sak Termerna migrant, flykting och asylskande r inte synonyma.
Understanding the differences is the first step to understand the EU framework on integration. 
Det frsta steget fr att frst EU:s ram fr integration r att frst skillnaderna mellan termerna.
For more information on terminology related with migration see the glossary of the European Migration Network (EMN)83. • Asylum-seeker (or asylum applicant) is a migrant that requests protection under the Geneva Convention of 195184 (international protection) or the national refugee law (national protection). • Beneficiary of humanitarian protection is a migrant to which protection has been provided under the national legislation. 
Fr mer information om migrationsrelaterad terminologi, se det europeiska migrationsntverkets ordfrklaringar83. Annan anvndbar terminologi, som bygger p Eurostat84, r Ľ Asylskande r en migrant som ansker om skydd enligt Genevekonventionen frn 195185 (internationellt skydd) eller den nationella flyktinglagen (nationellt skydd).
There are, therefore, different categories of migrant beyond refugees. 
Det finns drfr olika kategorier av migranter frutom flyktingar.
A person seeking protection clearly differs from other categories of migrants who migrate for employment, family reunification, study or research purposes. 
En person som sker skydd skiljer sig tydligt frn andra kategorier av migranter som migrerar av anledningar som arbete, familjeterfrening, studier eller forskning.