natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, because of the variability in the nature of and factors affecting the cases, these deadlines are indicative, and cannot be met in every case. 
Men eftersom det finns stora skillnader mellan mlens karaktr och faktorer som pverkar dem, r dessa tidsfrister vgledande och kan inte respekteras i samtliga fall.
As shown by Figure 4, the average duration for key steps generally exceeds the indicative deadlines, though there are differences between the two Courts. 
Ssom framgr av figur 4 verskrider den genomsnittliga mnader mnader tidstgngen fr viktiga steg i allmnhet de vgledande tidsfristerna, ven om det finns skillnader mellan de tv domstolarna.
For example, the average time for the preparation of the preliminary report for cases closed in 2014 and 2015 in the Court of Justice was about three months (against an indicative target of two months) and, in the General Court, about nine months (against an indicative target of either two or four months, depending on the type of case28). 
Exempelvis var genomsnittstiden fr utarbetandet av den frberedande rapporten i ml som avslutades under 2014 och 2015 vid domstolen omkring tre mnader (att jmfra med ett vgledande ml p tv mnader) och vid tribunalen omkring nio mnader (att jmfra med ett vgledande ml p antingen tv eller fyra mnader, beroende p typ av ml28).
In terms of average length of proceedings, there is a significant difference between cases decided by judgments and those decided by orders29, but irrespective of the type of case and type of decision (judgment or order), the written procedure, the preparation of the preliminary report and the closure are the longest steps in the lifecycle of a case. 
Nr det gller den genomsnittliga handlggningstiden r skillnaden stor mellan ml som avgrs genom dom och ml som avgrs genom beslut29, men oberoende av typen av ml och typen av avgrande (dom eller beslut) r det skriftliga frfarandet, utarbetandet av den frberedande rapporten och mlets avslutande de lngsta stegen i ett mls livscykel.
Our review covered the following key processes of case management: - Lodging and initial processing (including the reception and communication of the procedural documents), known as the written procedure, by the respective Registries (see paragraphs 36 to 40); - Assignment by the Presidents of the two Courts, including by the First Advocate-General where relevant (see paragraphs 41 to 45); - Handling of the cases by Chambers and Reporting Judges following their assignment, subject to the restrictions described in paragraph 13 (see paragraphs 46 to 50); and - The monitoring and management of the advancement of the cases by the two CourtsŐ Presidents (see paragraphs 51 to 60). 
Vr granskning omfattade fljande fyra viktiga processer i handlggningen av ml: - Anhngiggrande och inledande behandling (inbegripet mottagning och versndande av rttegngshandlingar), kallat det skriftliga frfarandet, vid respektive kansli (se punkterna 36Đ40). - Frdelning av mlen, vilket grs av ordfrandena fr de bda domstolarna och av frste generaladvokaten i relevanta fall (se punkterna 41Đ45). - Behandling av mlen av avdelningar och referenter efter att de frdelats, med beaktande av de begrnsningar som beskrivs i punkt 13 (se punkterna 46Đ50). - vervakning och styrning av hur handlggningen fortskrider av de tv domstolarnas ordfrande (se punkterna 51Đ60).
The use of replies to our questionnaires 33. 
Anvndning av svar p vra frgeformulr 33.
The questionnaires related to the 60 cases submitted to the Registries and to the Judges (and where appropriate to the Advocates-General) sought to obtain information as to the factors affecting the duration of the procedure (see paragraph 19), information as to the 28 29 25 Two months for appeals and four months for the other cases. 
Frgeformulren avsg de 60 ml som anhngiggjorts vid kanslierna och frdelats till domarna (och i tillmpliga fall till generaladvokaterna) och syftet med dem var att f fram information om de faktorer som pverkade tidstgngen fr frfarandet (se punkt 19), information om hur mycket tid som kunde tillskrivas varje sdan faktor och ytterligare detaljerade frklaringar i varje enskilt ml (t.ex. bsta praxis).
However, the replies received contained variable levels of information. 
Men de svar vi fick innehll olika mycket information.
On the basis of the replies received, we analysed the frequency of the factors evoked by the CJEU. 
Baserat p de mottagna svaren analyserade vi frekvensen av de faktorer som framhllits av EU-domstolen.
Subsequent interviews with the Judges and Advocates-General provided confirmation that those reasons have an impact on the overall duration of cases. 
Efterfljande intervjuer med domare och generaladvokater bekrftade att dessa faktorer har inverkan p den totala handlggningstiden fr mlen.
In the vast majority of cases, the Registries provided information on the time attributable to each factor affecting the duration. 
I det stora flertalet av mlen tillhandahll kanslierna information om den tid som kunde tillskrivas varje faktor som pverkade handlggningstiden.
The Judges and Advocates-General provided such information for a more limited number of the cases. 
Domarna och generaladvokaterna tillhandahll sdan information fr ett mer begrnsat antal ml.
Therefore, we were unable, for all cases sampled, to assess the impact on duration of the factors evoked. 
Drfr kunde vi inte i samtliga utvalda ml bedma inverkan p tidstgngen av de faktorer som framhllits.
Annex II provides a detailed analysis of the responses to the questionnaires showing the frequency of the factors evoked by the Registries, Judges and Advocates-General affecting the duration of procedures. 
I bilaga II finns en detaljerad analys av svaren p frgeformulren som visar frekvensen av de faktorer som kanslierna, domarna och generaladvokaterna framhllit som faktorer som pverkade handlggningstiden.
Figures 5 to 8 provide a summary of that information. 
Figurerna 5Đ8 ger en sammanfattning av den informationen.
Lodging and initial processing in the Registries (written procedure) 36. 
Anhngiggrande och inledande behandling vid kanslierna (skriftligt frfarande) 36.
The written procedure is managed by the Registries who apply the provisions of their respective Rules of Procedure. 
Det skriftliga frfarandet hanteras av kanslierna som tillmpar bestmmelserna i sina respektive rttegngsregler.
The latter set out inter alia the time-limits applicable to the parties for lodging their observations or written submissions. 
I de senare anges bland annat tillmpliga tidsfrister fr parterna att inkomma med skriftliga yttranden eller inlagor.
Our analysis shows that this step took on average 6.6 months at the Court of Justice and 9.1 months at the General Court in the years 2014 and 2015. 
Vr analys visar att detta steg i genomsnitt tog 6,6 mnader vid domstolen och 9,1 mnad vid tribunalen under ren 2014 och 2015.
In both instances, this represented a significant proportion of the lifespan of the case. 
I bda fallen motsvarade det en betydande andel av mlets livscykel.
It should be noted that the duration of this phase is determined by the Rules of Procedure, which set deadlines for the submission of the various procedural documents, but also depends on the parties involved (requesting for example the extension of deadlines or the confidential treatment of certain information) and on whether third parties request to intervene in the proceedings. 
Det br noteras att tidstgngen fr denna fas bestms av rttegngsreglerna, dr tidsfrister anges fr att inkomma med olikarttegngshandlingar, men den beror ocks p de berrda parterna (som till exempel begr frlngning av 26 tidsfrister eller konfidentiell behandling av viss information) liksom p huruvida tredje parter begr att f intervenera i frfarandet.
An overview of the most frequent factors that, according to the Registries in the replies related to the 60 selected cases, affected the duration of the written procedure is presented in Figure 5 for the Court of Justice and in Figure 6 for the General Court. 
En versikt ver de vanligaste faktorerna som, enligt kanslierna i svaren om de 60 utvalda mlen, pverkade tidstgngen fr det skriftliga frfarandet visas i figur 5 fr domstolen och i figur 6 fr tribunalen.
Figure 6 Đ Most frequent factors affecting the duration of the written procedure of the 30 selected cases at the General Court 27 33% 17% 13% 13% 10% 10% Translations expected from the institutions that are parties to the proceedings Workload of DG Translation Granting one or several applications to intervene Request to produce documents sent to the parties Admission of a second exchange of pleadings (reply/ rejoinder) Extension of a time-limit at the request of a party 87% 67% 53% 63% 40% 20% 20% 20% Reception and processing of procedural documents at the Registry Admission of a second exchange of pleadings (reply/rejoinder) Regularisation request Other procedural question to determine Extension of a time-limit at the request of a party Granting one or several applications to intervene Application for leave to intervene Treatment of a voluminous document Source: ECA analysis of CJEU questionnaires. 
Figur 5 Đ De vanligaste faktorerna som pverkade tidstgngen fr det skriftliga frfarandet i de 30 utvalda mlen vid domstolen 27 33% 17% 13% 13% 10% 10% versttningar frvntas inkomma frn institutioner som r part i mlet Arbetsbelastning p generaldirektoratet fr versttning Godknnande av en eller flera interventionsanskningar Begran om ingivande av handlingar skickas till parterna Medgivande av en andra skriftvxling (replik/duplik) Frlngning av en tidsfrist p begran av en part Klla: Europeiska revisionsrttens analys av frgeformulr till EU-domstolen.
The overview shows that for the Court of Justice the two most frequent factors highlighted are related to the translations made by other EU institutions30 and those due to the workload of the CJEUŐs Directorate-General for Translation (DG TRAD)31. 
Fr domstolens del visar versikten att de tv vanligaste faktorerna rr de versttningar som grs av andra EU-institutioner30 och arbetsbelastningen p EU-domstolens generaldirektorat fr versttning31.
We further analyzed the impact of the work of DG TRAD on case management (see paragraphs 74 to 79) which showed that the impact of this factor on overall case duration to be limited. 
Vi gjorde en ytterligare analys av den inverkan som arbetet inom generaldirektoratet fr versttning hade p handlggningen av mlen (se punkterna 74Đ79) som visade att denna faktors inverkan p den totala handlggningstiden var begrnsad.
For the General Court, the factors indicated concerned mainly regulatory procedures related to the exchange of documents with parties32 and the time needed to deal with voluminous case documentation. 
Fr tribunalens del rrde de faktorer som lyftes fram i huvudsak procedurregler och bestmmelser fr utbytet av handlingar med parterna32 och den tid som gr t till att hantera omfattande dokumentation i varje ml.
Examples of the reasons for prolongation of the written procedure for the Court of Justice and for the General Court are shown in Box 2. 
Exempel p anledningar till att skriftliga frfaranden dragit ut p tiden vid domstolen och vid tribunalen visas i ruta 2.
28 Box 2 Đ Examples of the prolongation of the written procedure at the Court of Justice and at the General Court Court of Justice One case concerned a reference for a preliminary ruling where the request made by the national court was not sufficiently detailed. 
29 Ruta 2 Đ Exempel p anledningar till att skriftliga frfaranden dragit ut p tiden vid domstolen och tribunalen Domstolen Ett ml rrde ett frhandsavgrande dr den begran som lmnats in av den nationella domstolen inte var tillrckligt detaljerad.
The assessment by the Court of Justice of the implications of the case turned out to be complex. 
Domstolens bedmning av mlets fljder visade sig bli komplex.
It took three months to send a written request to the national court to obtain the necessary clarifications. 
Det tog tre mnader att skicka en skriftlig begran till den nationella domstolen och erhlla ndvndiga klarlgganden.
A similar situation happened for another case where the procedure was prolonged by one month and 10 days. 
En liknande situation uppstod i ett annat ml dr frfarandet frlngdes med en mnad och 10 dagar.
General Court In one case relating to an action for annulment, the prolongation of the procedures by 18 months was due to legal arguments from the parties about confidentiality issues. 
Tribunalen I ett ml som rrde en talan om ogiltigfrklaring frlngdes frfarandena med 18 mnader beroende p parternas rttsliga argument i frgor om konfidentialitet.
In another case the problems of confidentiality were resolved only after 17 months. 
I ett annat ml lstes konfidentialitetsproblemen frst efter 17 mnader.
During our review we observed that both Courts had already taken pro-active steps to change and improve certain procedures that affected the duration of the written procedure to avoid excessive delays in this phase. 
Vid vr granskning observerade vi att bda domstolarna redan hade vidtagit frebyggande tgrder fr att frndra och frbttra vissa frfaranden som pverkade tidstgngen fr det skriftliga frfarandet fr att undvika alltfr stora frseningar i denna fas.
The continuous improvement of the Rules of Procedure, simplifications to decision-making procedures and the ongoing promotion of electronic case lodging (E-Curia) since 2011 to minimize the use of paper documents are examples of these actions. 
Kontinuerlig frbttring av rttegngsreglerna, frenklingar av beslutsfrfaranden och frmjandet av elektronisk registrering av mlen (E-Curia) sedan 2011 fr att minimera anvndningen av handlingar i pappersform r exempel p sdana tgrder.
The process of assignment of cases referred to the Courts 41. 
Frfarandet fr att frdela de ml som anhngiggjorts vid domstolarna 41.
The analysis of data relating to the cases closed in 2014 and 2015 shows that the average time taken from receipt of a case to assignment to a Judge is 2.3 months at the Court of Justice and 1.5 months at the General Court. 
Analysen av uppgifter rrande de ml som avslutades 2014 och 2015 visar att den genomsnittliga tiden frn mottagandet av ett ml till dess att det tilldelats en domare r 2,3 mnader vid domstolen och 1,5 mnader vid tribunalen.
However, this does not have a significant impact on the overall time taken to process the cases, because essential preliminary work carried out in the relevant Registry takes place at the same time. 
Detta har dock ingen avgrande inverkan p den totala handlggningstiden eftersom viktigt frberedelsearbete samtidigt utfrs vid respektive kansli.
Court of Justice 42. 
Domstolen 42.
The President of the Court of Justice is responsible for assignment to an individual Reporting Judge, and the First Advocate-General assigns the case to an Advocate-General. 
Domstolens ordfrande ansvarar fr frdelningen av ett ml till en enskild referent, och frste generaladvokaten frdelar mlet till en generaladvokat.
The assignment takes account of several factors, including the current workload of Judges and similarity with other cases. 
Vid frdelningen tas hnsyn till flera faktorer, bland annat domarnas rdande arbetsbelastning och likheten med andra ml.
In addition, rules are applied to avoid allocation to Judges of the same nationality as the case and, for the appeals from the General Court; the case is not allocated to a Judge with the nationality of the original Reporting Judge. 
Dessutom tillmpas regler fr att undvika frdelning till domare av samma nationalitet som mlet, och ml som gller verklaganden av tribunalens avgranden tilldelas inte en domare av samma nationalitet som den ursprungliga referenten.
General Court 44. 
Tribunalen 44.
The President of the General Court assigns cases to the nine Chambers in turn, following internal rules35. 
Tribunalens ordfrande frdelar mlen mellan de nio avdelningarna i enlighet med interna regler35.
These provide for four separate rotas relating respectively to: (i) cases concerning application of the competition rules to undertakings, the rules on State aid and the rules on trade protection measures; (ii) cases concerning intellectual property rights; (iii) civil service cases (only since 2016) and (iv) cases other than those referred to above. 
Dessa innehller fyra separata turordningar som relaterar till fljande respektive omrden: i) ml som rr tillmpningen av konkurrensregler fr fretag, regler om statligt std och regler om handelspolitiska skyddstgrder, ii) ml som rr immateriella rttigheter, iii) personalml (endast sedan 2016) och iv) andra ml n dem som avses ovan.
In conformity with the applicable rules, the President may derogate from those rotas on the ground that cases received are connected with others being processed or previously completed, or with a view to ensuring an even spread of the workload. 
I enlighet med tillmpliga regler fr ordfranden frng dessa turordningar p grund av att mottagna ml r kopplade till andra ml som r under behandling eller har avslutats, eller i syfte att uppn en jmnare frdelning av arbetsbrdan.
As described in paragraphs 33 and 34, the information provided by the Judges and Advocates-General in the questionnaires referred, in the majority of cases, to the frequency 34 35 See Articles 53, paragraph 2 (lack of jurisdiction or manifestly admissible requests), 99 (reply by reasoned order) and 181 (manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded appeal or cross-appeal) of the Rules of Procedure. 
Se artikel 53.2 (domstolen saknar behrighet att prva ett ml eller det r uppenbart att en begran inte kan tas upp till prvning), artikel 99 (svar genom srskilt uppsatt beslut som r motiverat) och artikel 181 (verklagande som uppenbart inte kan tas upp till prvning eller r uppenbart ogrundat) i rttegngsreglerna.
Decisions conforming to Article 25 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court (OJ C 313, 26.10.2013, p. 
Beslut i enlighet med artikel 25 i tribunalens rttegngsregler (EUT C 313, 26.10.2013, s.
4 and OJ C 296, 16.8.2016, p. 
4 och EUT C 296, 16.8.2016, s.
of the various factors affecting the duration, rather than the time attributable to those factors. 
Ssom beskrivs i punkterna 33 och 34 rrde den information som domarna och generaladvokaterna tillhandahll via frgeformulren i flertalet ml frekvensen av de olika faktorer som pverkade tidstgngen, snarare n den tid som kunde tillskrivas dessa faktorer.
Furthermore, whilst we have information in respect of the passage of time in each of the steps, data is not available on how many days of work including Judges, Advocates-General and their Cabinet staff were actually needed to achieve each step. 
Och ven om vi har information om tidsfrloppet fr varje steg, finns det inga tillgngaliga uppgifter om hur mnga dagars arbete som faktiskt krvdes av domare, generaladvokater och deras kabinettspersonal fr att fullflja varje steg.
The replies to the questionnaires are however an initial source of information on which the CJEU could build further analysis. 
Svaren p frgeformulren utgr dock en initial klla till information som EU-domstolen skulle kunna anvnda som underlag fr ytterligare analys.
An overview of the most frequent factors affecting the duration of the handling of cases given by the Judges in respect of the cases concerned (and, where applicable, the Advocates-General) is presented in Figure 7 for the Court of Justice and in Figure 8 for the General Court. 
En versikt ver de vanligaste faktorerna som pverkade tidstgngen fr hantering av mlen enligt svaren frn domarna i de berrda mlen (och, i frekommande fall, generaladvokaterna) visas i figur 7 fr domstolen och i figur 8 fr tribunalen.
The full analysis of the factors affecting the duration of the 60 cases is given in Annex II. 
Den fullstndiga analysen av de faktorer som pverkade handlggningstiden i de 60 mlen finns i bilaga II.
Figure 7 Đ Most frequent factors affecting the duration of the handling of the 30 selected cases at the Court of Justice 31 63% 40% 40% 40% 37% 17% 17% 13% Judicial vacations Workload of the rfrendaire responsible for the file Case raising new and/or particularly complex legal issues Sickness, maternity / parental leave, or departure of a rfrendaire Workload of the Reporting Judge and/or the Advocate General Voluminous case Factually, economical or scientifically complicated case Complex case for other reasons Source: ECA analysis of CJEU questionnaires. Figure 8 Đ Most frequent factors affecting the duration of the handling of the 30 selected cases at the General Court Source: ECA analysis of CJEU questionnaires. 
Figur 8 Đ De vanligaste faktorerna som pverkade tidstgngen fr behandlingen av de 30 utvalda mlen vid tribunalen 32 63% 40% 40% 40% 37% 17% 17% 13% Rttsferier Arbetsbelastning fr den rttssekreterare som ansvarar fr akten i mlet Ml som gller nya och/eller srskilt komplexa rttsfrgor En rttssekreterare blir sjuk, gravid/frldraledig eller slutar Arbetsbelastning fr referenten och/eller generaladvokaten Omfattande ml Sakligt, ekonomiskt eller vetenskapligt komplicerat ml Komplext ml av andra orsaker Gruppen av lektrer granskar utkasten till avgranden Arbetsbelastning fr referenten och/eller generaladvokaten Frndring av avdelningens sammansttning Omfrdelning av ett ml Arbetsbelastning fr den rttssekreterare som ansvarar fr akten i mlet tgrd fr processledning Samordnad behandling av en grupp av ml (exempelvis ml som rr konkurrensbegrnsande avtal) Mandattiden lper ut fr referenten och/eller generaladvokaten 97% 67% 63% 60% 53% 53% 37% 37% Klla: Europeiska revisionsrttens analys av frgeformulr till EU-domstolen.
At the General Court, the most frequent factor affecting the duration of the sampled cases resulted from the time needed by the Ňcellule des lecteurs dŐarrtsÓ. 
Vid tribunalen framgick det att den vanligaste faktorn som pverkade tidstgngen fr de utvalda mlen var den tid som gruppen av lektrer behvde.
This was due to the significant workload experienced by this service as a result of the efforts to reduce the backlog of cases in the years 2014 and 2015. 
Detta berodde p den stora arbetsbelastning som den tjnsten hade till fljd av anstrngningarna fr att minska efterslpningen av ml under ren 2014 och 2015.
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the internal deadlines set for this work were generally respected. The other factors frequently indicated were the workload of the Reporting Judges and of their rfrendaires, the change of composition of the Chamber dealing with the case, the re-assignment of cases and the measures of organisation of procedure. 
Det br dock noteras att de interna tidsfrister som hade faststllts fr detta arbete i allmnhet respekterades. vriga faktorer som angavs i mnga av svaren var arbetsbelastningen fr referenterna och deras rttssekreterare, ndrad sammansttning av den avdelning som hade hand om mlet, omfrdelning av ml och tgrder fr processledning.
Comparisons between the frequency of specific factors in the Court of Justice and the General Court are presented in Box 3. 
Jmfrelser mellan frekvensen av specifika faktorer vid domstolen och tribunalen visas i ruta 3.
33 Box 3 Đ Comparisons between the frequency of specific factors in the Court of Justice and the General Court Complexity and voluminous case documentation The complexity of the issues raised by the cases is indicated by the Judges as one of the most frequent factors affecting the duration after the written procedure. 
33 Ruta 3 Đ Jmfrelser mellan frekvensen av specifika faktorer vid domstolen och tribunalen Komplexitet och omfattande dokumentation i mlen Komplexiteten i de frgor som togs upp i mlen anges av domarna som en av de vanligaste faktorerna som pverkade tidstgngen efter det skriftliga frfarandet.