natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In view of the scope limitation described in paragraphs 12 to 14, we obtained, through management representations, information on the main reasons why the indicative time-frames were not always respected. 
Mot bakgrund av den begrnsning av tillgngen till handlingar som beskrivs i punkterna 12Đ14 inhmtade vi information om huvudsklen till att de vgledande tidsramarna inte alltid hade respekterats genom uttalanden frn ledningen.
These included the workload of Judges, the availability of rfrendaires, and the complexity of the cases. 
Sklen omfattade domarnas arbetsbelastning, rttssekreterarnas tillgnglighet och mlens komplexitet.
This analysis allowed us to gain insight into the factors that can affect the duration of this phase. 
Denna analys gav oss insikt i faktorer som kan pverka tidstgngen fr denna fas.
However, there was insufficient information on the specific time attributable to the 46 factors identified. 
Men det fanns otillrckligt med information om den specifika tidstgng som kunde tillskrivas de identifierade faktorerna.
In addition, there was little information provided regarding the availability and use of human resources in respect of specific cases. 
Dessutom fanns det endast lite information om tillgnglighet och utnyttjande av mnskliga resurser i specifika ml.
This prevented us from concluding whether, and to what extent, there would have been scope for reduction of the duration of the selected cases (see paragraphs 33 to 35, and 46 to 50). 
Det hindrade oss frn att dra slutsatser om huruvida, och i vilken utstrckning, det skulle ha funnits utrymme fr att minska tidstgngen i de utvalda mlen (se punkterna 33Đ35, och 46Đ50).
We note that the translation service also works toward a series of fixed time-frames combined with tailored deadlines. 
Vi noterar att versttningstjnsten ocks arbetar mot ett antal fasta tidsramar kombinerat med anpassade tidsfrister.
Our analysis of cases did not show that the translation element of the process significantly lengthened the overall case duration, with a significant number of translation tasks finished within the deadlines. 
Vr analys visade inte att versttningsdelen av processen ledde till ngon betydande frlngning av den totala handlggningstiden, d ett betydande antal versttningsuppgifter slutfrdes inom tidsfristerna.
Furthermore, the implementation of key performance indicators, which should allow inter-institutional comparisons to be made, is underway (see paragraphs 74 to 79). 
Dessutom r man p vg att infra centrala resultatindikatorer som ska mjliggra interinstitutionella jmfrelser (se punkterna 74Đ79).
The IT systems in place at the CJEU are complex and rely on an ageing central data-base to which a large number of sub-systems have been added over time. 
De befintliga it-systemen vid EU-domstolen r komplexa och bygger p en ldre central databas till vilken ett stort antal undersystem efter hand har lagts till.
The CJEU has not yet developed a fully integrated IT system to support case management. 
EU-domstolen har nnu inte utvecklat ett fullt integrerat it-system fr att stdja handlggningen av ml.
We conclude that the longer term goal of the development of a more integrated approach should provide for efficiency gains, limit the need for duplication, minimize the need for manual input and reduce the need to support a large number of applications (see paragraphs 80 to 85). 
Vi drar slutsatsen att mlet p lngre sikt att utveckla en mer integrerad lsning br leda till effektivitetsvinster, begrnsa behovet av dubbelarbete, minimera behovet av manuella inmatningar och minska behovet att stdja ett stort antal applikationer (se punkterna 80Đ 85).
There are both advantages and disadvantages to the current regime whereby French is the language of deliberation and the de facto working language of the institution. Consideration has been given within the CJEU to performing a cost-benefit analysis on the possibility to extend the language of deliberation to languages other than French in the General Court and this could help to assess the situation and to provide support to any future decision (see paragraphs 86 to 89). 
Det finns bde fr-och nackdelar med den nuvarande ordningen som innebr att franska r enda verlggningssprk och i praktiken arbetssprk inom institutionen. vervganden har gjorts inom EU-domstolen om att utfra en kostnadsnyttoanalys av mjligheten att utka verlggningssprket till andra sprk n franska vid tribunalen. En sdan analys skulle kunna vara till hjlp fr att bedma situationen och ge underlag fr framtida beslut (se punkterna 86Đ89).
Overall, we conclude that there is potential to further enhance performance by a move toward more active individual case management. 
Vr vergripande slutsats r att det finns potential fr att ytterligare ka effektiviteten genom en vergng till en mer aktiv, individuell handlggning av ml.
The CJEUŐs current performance measurement approach is not based on tailored time-frames for individual cases, taking into account complexity, workload, resources needed and staff availability. 
EU-domstolens nuvarande metod fr att mta effektiviteten r inte baserad p skrddarsydda tidsramar fr enskilda ml, med hnsyn tagen till komplexitet, arbetsbelastning, resursbehov och tillgnglighet p personal.
In order to improve case management, the CJEU should consider: (A) Measuring performance on a case by case basis by reference to a tailored timeframe, taking account of the actual resources employed. 
I syfte att frbttra handlggningen av ml br EU-domstolen vervga fljande: a) Att mta effektiviteten i varje enskilt ml genom jmfrelse mot en skrddarsydd tidsram, med hnsyn tagen till de resurser som faktiskt anvnts.
This would inform management of both problem cases and elements of good practice, and could be used to drive further efficiency gains. (B) Continuing the improvements made in terms of reporting on performance by moving toward the development of a system of reporting on the specific numbers of cases meeting expected time-frames rather than average length of types of cases. 
Det skulle ge information till ledningen om bde problemfall och goda exempel och skulle kunna anvndas fr att uppn ytterligare effektivitetsvinster. b) Att fortstta de frbttringar som gjorts nr det gller resultatrapporteringen genom att g ver till att utveckla ett system fr rapportering av det specifika antalet ml som hllit frvntade tidsramar snarare n genomsnittlig lngd p typer av ml.
It would permit more detailed reporting on results, thereby enhancing the CJEU accountability. This is particular pertinent in view of the new resources made available in the context of the reform. 
Det skulle mjliggra en mer detaljerad resultatrapportering och drigenom strka EU-domstolens redovisningsskyldighet. Detta r srskilt relevant med tanke p de nya resurser som tillgngliggrs i samband med reformen. c) Att genomfra en politik som ger utrymme fr strre flexibilitet i frdelningen av arbetet mellan befintliga rttssekreterare, fr att bidra till att avhjlpa de problem 49
(C) Implementation of a policy allowing for a more flexible allocation of existing rfrendaires to help mitigate problems arising from factors related to the management of resources or organizational issues (unavailability of rfrendaires, workload of Judges, Advocates-General and their rfrendaires, re-assignment of cases due to the end of the JudgesŐ mandate). (D) Further raising the awareness of the Member States and the Council of the importance of the timely nomination and appointment of Judges. (E) Completing the cost-benefit analysis of the impact (organisational, budgetary and in terms of case duration) of a change of the current practice in the General Court to use languages other than French for deliberation. 
som uppstr p grund av faktorer som rr resursfrvaltning eller organisationsfrgor (att rttssekreterare inte r tillgngliga, arbetsbelastning fr domare, generaladvokater och deras rttssekreterare eller omfrdelning av ml p grund av att domares mandattid lper ut). d) Att ytterligare hja medlemsstaternas och rdets medvetenhet om vikten av att domare nomineras och utses i tid. e) Att slutfra kostnadsnyttoanalysen om effekterna (organisatoriskt, budgetmssigt och i frga om mlens handlggningstid) av en frndring av nuvarande praxis i tribunalen till att anvnda andra sprk n franska fr verlggning. f) Mjligheten att infra ett fullt integrerat it-system fr att stdja handlggningen av ml.
This Report was adopted by Chamber V, headed by Mr Lazaros S. LAZAROU, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 5 September 2017. 
Denna rapport antogs av revisionsrttens avdelning V, med ledamoten Lazaros S. Lazarou som ordfrande, vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 5 september 2017.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President 49 
Fr revisionsrtten Klaus-Heiner Lehne ordfrande 50
Check-list for the assessment of CEPEJ time management indicators ANNEX III 1 CEPEJ indicator Main check-list questions (1) Ability to assess the overall length of proceedings Is there a unique identifier (e.g. a case number) or connector for each proceeding, from the instigation to the final and binding decision? 
Checklista fr bedmning av Cepejs tidsfrvaltningsindikatorer BILAGA III 1 Cepej-indikator Huvudfrgor p checklistan 1) Mjlighet att bedma den totala handlggningstiden Finns det en unik identifierare (t.ex. ett mlnummer) eller sammanlnkande faktor fr varje rende, frn anhngiggrandet till det slutliga bindande avgrandet?
Can you determine the overall length of proceedings for all cases pending? 
Kan ni faststlla den totala handlggningstiden fr alla pgende ml?
(2) Established standards for duration of proceedings Have you developed standards for optimum time-frames in relevant types of proceedings? Is the length of proceedings predictable for the users (parties, lawyers, others)? 
2) Faststllda standarder fr handlggningstiden Har ni utvecklat standarder fr optimala tidsramar fr relevanta typer av frfaranden? r handlggningstiden frutsebar fr anvndarna (parter, advokater och vriga)?
(3) Sufficiently elaborated typology of cases Is there a categorization of cases with regard to their complexity and duration? 
3) Tillrckligt utvecklad typindelning av ml Grs det en kategorisering av mlen med avseende p komplexitet och tidstgng?
(4) Ability to monitor course of proceedings Do you monitor and collect data about the timing of the most important stages in most types of cases, with a view to establishing where and why delays occur? 
4) Mjlighet att vervaka frfarandets gng vervakar ni och samlar in uppgifter om tidstgng fr de viktigaste stegen i de flesta typer av ml, i syfte att faststlla var och varfr frseningar uppstr?
(5) Means to promptly diagnose delays and mitigate their consequences Can responsibility for the identification and avoidance of undue delays be clearly determined? 
5) Medel fr att snabbt diagnostisera frseningar och mildra deras konsekvenser Kan ansvaret fr att identifiera och undvika ondiga frseningar tydligt faststllas?
Are there procedures to promptly identify delay and reduce the impact of delays on the parties? 
Finns det frfaranden fr att snabbt identifiera frseningar och minska frseningarnas konsekvenser fr parterna?
Are procedures in place to accelerate the proceedings and prevent delays? 
Finns det frfaranden fr att pskynda handlggningen och frebygga frseningar?
(6) The use of modern technology as a tool for time management in the justice system Is information technology effectively used to monitor length of proceedings? 
6) Anvndning av ny teknik som ett verktyg fr tidsfrvaltning i rttssystemet Anvnds informationsteknik p ett ndamlsenligt stt fr att vervaka handlggningstiden?
Does information technology enable prompt production of statistical reports and planning at the policy level? 
Ger informationstekniken mjligheter till snabbt framtagande av statistiska rapporter och planering p politisk niv?
Source: Time management checklist (Check-list of indicators for the analysis of lengths of proceedings in the justice system) (CEPEJ, 2005). 
Klla: Time management check-list (Check-list of indicators for the analysis of lengths of proceedings in the justice system) (checklista fr tidsfrvaltning [checklista ver indikatorer fr analys av handlggningstider inom rttssystemet]) (Cepej, 2005).
ANNEX IV Correlation analysis between complexity factors and case duration of the cases closed in 2014 and 2015 at the Court of Justice and at the General Court Case complexity analysis at the Court of Justice 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 Complexity score increases Case complexity analysis at the General Court 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Complexity score increases Note: Each point in the graphs represents a case closed in 2014 or 2015. 
BILAGA IV Analys av sambandet mellan komplexitetsfaktorer och handlggningstid i de ml som avslutades 2014 och 2015 vid domstolen och vid tribunalen Analys av mlens komplexitet vid domstolen 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 kande komplexitetspong Analys av mlens komplexitet vid tribunalen 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 kande komplexitetspong Anmrkning: Varje punkt i diagrammen motsvarar ett ml som avslutades 2014 eller 2015.
The black lines represent the trend-lines which show where a case may be expected to fall given its complexity score. 
De svarta linjerna r trendlinjer som visar var ett ml frvntas placera sig givet dess komplexitetspong.
The points further away from the trend-lines represent those cases which may have characteristics meriting further examination. 
Punkterna lngre bort frn trendlinjerna motsvarar de ml som kan ha egenskaper som motiverar ytterligare underskning.
1 Duration (months) increases Duration (months) increases REPLIES OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Paragraphs I and II Efficiency, quality and independence are the main parameters of an effective justice system. 
EUROPEISKA UNIONENS DOMSTOLS BEM TANDE Punkterna I och II Effektivitet, kvalitet och oberoende r de viktigaste parametrarna fr ett effektivt rttssystem.1 Av detta fljer att handlggningstiderna fr ml r en faktor bland andra att ta i beaktande vid utvrderingen av ett domstolssystem.
In their pursuit of efficiency, the Courts comprising the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) are guided by the need to find a balance between rapidity, on the one hand, and the quality of judicial review and of court decisions, on the other, in a context characterised by an overall increase in their workload. 
Det som r vgledande fr de domstolar som tillsammans utgr Europeiska unionens domstol i deras strvan efter kad effektivitet r att, mot bakgrund av en generell kning av arbetsbrdan, finna den ndvndiga balansen mellan skyndsamhet,  ena sidan, och kvaliteten p domstolsprvningen och domstolsavgrandena,  andra sidan.
The Court of Justice and the General Court have taken numerous organisational and procedural measures with a view to enhancing their efficiency in dealing with cases. 
Domstolen och tribunalen har vidtagit en rad tgrder, svl organisatoriska som hnfrliga till rttegngsfrfarandet, i syfte att frbttra effektiviteten i handlggningen av ml.
Thus, the average duration of a case before the Court of Justice was 19.6 months in 2006 and 14.7 months in 2016, while, before the General Court, that duration was 25.8 months in 2006 and 18.7 months in 2016. 
Fr tribunalen uppgick den genomsnittliga handlggningstiden fr ett ml till 25,8 mnader r 2006 och till 18,7 mnader r 2016.
It should be noted that, during the same period, the number of cases brought increased significantly. 
Det mste understrykas att antalet anhngiggjorda ml har kat kraftigt under samma period.
Paragraph III The efficiency gains in case-management noted above are the result of, inter alia, the introduction of various time-frames and monitoring tools by the Court of Justice and the General Court in the management of cases brought before them. 
Punkt III De slunda konstaterade effektivitetsvinsterna i handlggningen av ml r bland annat resultatet av domstolens och tribunalens infrande av olika tidsramar och uppfljningsverktyg fr handlggningen av ml.
Those time-frames include indicative internal deadlines for the completion of each step in the proceedings. 
Tidsramarna innehller indikativa interna frister fr genomfrandet av varje steg i frfarandet.
Although they refer to types of proceedings in general, each case is individually monitored in order to ensure that the deadlines laid down are respected. 
Dessa tidsramar avser frvisso samtliga typer av frfaranden i allmnhet, men det grs individuella uppfljningar av att de angivna fristerna fljs i varje enskilt ml.
In that context, the Court of AuditorsŐ recommendation that the time-frames should be further refined by taking into account the specific nature of each type of proceedings and the complexity of the cases can only be welcomed (see paragraph 98). 
I detta sammanhang vlkomnar Europeiska unionens domstol revisionsrttens rekommendation att ytterligare frfina tidsramarna genom att beakta vad som specifikt knnetecknar varje frfarande och mlens grad av komplexitet (se punkt 98).
With regard to a system of monitoring the actual use of the human resources employed at each stage of each of the cases that the two Courts deal with each year (for example, in 2016, the Court of Justice and the General Court disposed of 1459 cases), also recommended by the Court of Auditors, the CJEU takes the view that the study of its implementation will have to take into account the non-negligible administrative burden and use of resources which this might entail. 
Betrffande revisionsrttens rekommendation angende ett system fr att redovisa de resurser som faktiskt tas i ansprk i varje steg i varje ml som domstolen och tribunalen handlgger varje r (som exempel kan nmnas att domstolen och tribunalen r 2016 avgjorde 1459 ml) anser Europeiska unionens domstol att en genomfrandeanalys infr inrttandet av ett sdant system mste beakta den icke obetydliga administrativa brda och den resursutgng som det skulle kunna medfra.
Those considerations will have to be balanced against the specific utility of the analysis of the data obtained by means of such a system. 
Dessa vervganden mste vgas mot den praktiska nytta som en analys av de uppgifter som erhlls tack vare ett sdant system ger.
Paragraph 4 The number of cases brought before the EU Courts did not remain stable during the period 2006-2016. 
Punkt 4 Antalet ml som anhngiggjordes vid unionsdomstolarna under perioden 2006Đ2016 har inte frblivit stabilt.
The stock increased during that period, despite the significant increase in productivity, because of an even greater increase in the number of cases brought, as a result of, inter alia, the successive enlargements of the European Union, the expansion of the powers of the European Union and the increase in the number and variety of legislative and regulatory acts. 
Anledningarna till att balanserna kade under denna period, trots en betydande kning av produktiviteten, r en n mer betydande kning av antalet anhngiggjorde ml (bland annat till fljd av Europeiska unionens successiva utvidgningar), utkningen av Europeiska unionens befogenheter och en mer omfattande och mngskiftande lagstiftnings-och regleringsverksamhet.
The CJEU wishes to draw attention to the fact that, while the number of cases brought before the three Courts which comprised the institution increased by 43.6% between 2006 and 2016, the number of cases closed each year by those Courts during that same period increased by almost 57.3%. 
Europeiska unionens domstol vill fsta uppmrksamheten p det faktum att, samtidigt som antalet ml som under perioden 2006Đ2016 anhngiggjordes vid de tre domstolar som institutionen d bestod av kade med 43,6 procent, kade under samma period det antal ml som dessa domstolar rligen avgjorde med nstan 57,3 procent.
The CJEU is extremely sensitive to the need, mentioned by the Court of Auditors, to 1 The EU 2016 Justice Scoreboard (COM(2016) 199 final), p. 
1 Resultattavlan fr rttskipningen i EU 2016 (COM (2016) 199 final), s.
It must nevertheless be emphasised that the quality of judicial decisions is of prime importance in a Union based on the rule of law. 
Det mste emellertid understrykas att domstolsavgrandenas kvalitet r av fundamental betydelse i en rttslig union.
The adoption of consistent and reasoned decisions which respect the rights of the parties to the proceedings ensures legal certainty and the right to effective judicial protection. 
Koherenta och motiverade avgranden, vilka beslutas med iakttagande av parternas rttigheter, garanterar nmligen rttsskerheten och rtten till en effektiv domstolsprvning.
Paragraph 9 As the report rightly points out, the various measures adopted by the Court of Justice and the General Court in recent years have produced significant results. 
Punkt 9 Ssom ppekas i rapporten har de tgrder som sedan flera r har vidtagits av domstolen och tribunalen haft mrkbara resultat.
Despite a considerable increase in the number of cases brought before those Courts, the number of cases which they closed has increased substantially and the overall duration of proceedings, across all categories, has decreased very significantly. 
Antalet avgjorda ml har kat vsentligt och handlggningstiderna i allmnhet, utan hnsyn till mltyp, har minskat ytterst signifikant, trots en betydande kning av antalet anhngiggjorda ml.
Figure 2 The average duration of proceedings, both before the Court of Justice and before the General Court, has fallen consistently for several years. 
Figur 2 Den genomsnittliga handlggningstiden fr ml svl i domstolen som i tribunalen har sedan flera r stndigt sjunkit.
Figure 2 illustrates only the assertion in paragraph 9 that that positive trend could not be confirmed for each type of proceedings. 
Figur 2 illustrerar endast pstendet i punkt 9 att denna gynnsamma utveckling inte kan konstateras fr varje mltyp.
A presentation in the form of triennial averages would show that there is a consistent downward trend in the average duration of proceedings, including by subject-matter/type of proceedings. 
En framstllning i form av trersgenomsnitt skulle gra det mjligt att konstatera att det finns en trend mot minskade genomsnittliga handlggningstider, inbegripet efter mne/mltyp.
Lastly, those graphs give an incomplete picture of the results achieved by the two Courts in terms of the reduction in the duration of proceedings as they do not establish a correlation between the duration of the proceedings and the number of cases concerned. 
Dessa tabeller ger en ofullstndig bild av de resultat som domstolen och tribunalen uppntt i form av en minskning av handlggningstiderna, eftersom de inte visar p sambandet mellan handlggningstid och antalet berrda ml.