natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Example of instability in the economic context of a project In Cambodia, the Commission financed a project to promote Waste to Energy technology in the rice milling sector. 
Exempel p instabilitet i ett projekts ekonomiska bakgrund I Kambodja finansierade kommissionen ett projekt fr att frmja teknik fr att generera energi frn avfall inom risbearbetningssektorn.
However, in recent years, Cambodia has seen major investments in larger and more efficient rice mills that have led to a four‐fold capacity increase between 2009 and 201383. 
Under senare r har dock Kambodja ftt betydande investeringar i strre och effektivare risbearbetningsanlggningar som lett till att kapaciteten kat fyrfaldigt mellan 2009 och 201383.
It is now expected that most rice mill‐ ers require more powerful systems than those initially planned for promotion by the project, at much higher costs. 
Man frvntar sig nu att de flesta risbearbetningsanlggningar krver kraftfullare system n de som enligt de ursprungliga planerna skulle frmjas av projektet till mycket hgre kostnader.
For this reason, the project’s initial objectives have lost some of their relevance and are likely not to be achieved as initially planned. 
Drfr har projektets ursprungliga ml frlorat en del av sin relevans och kommer sannolikt inte att uppns s som ursprungligen planerades.
83 World Bank policy note on Trade Development — Turning Cambodia into a leading rice exporter, September 2013. 
83 World Bank policy note on Trade Development Đ Turning Cambodia into a leading rice exporter (Vrldsbankens policykommentar om handels-utveckling Đ att frvandla Kambodja till en ledande risexportr), september 2013.
Example of changes in management and control systems On 1 January 2015, the Commission’s ‘Support Group for Ukraine’ and ‘Neighbourhood’ Directorate were transferred from EuropeAid to the Directorate‐General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations, DG Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations (formerly the Directorate‐General for Enlargement, DG Enlargement)84. 
Exempel p frndringar i frvaltnings-och kontrollsystemen Den 1 januari 2015 verfrdes kommissionens stdgrupp fr Ukraina och direktoratet fr grannskapspolitik frn generaldirektoratet fr samarbete och utveckling EuropeAid till generaldirektoratet fr grannskapspolitik och utvidgningsfrhandlingar (tidigare generaldirektoratet fr utvidgning)84.
This will affect both the geographical coverage of EuropeAid’s results framework and the way in which neighbourhood policy results are monitored and reported. 
Detta kommer att pverka bde den geografiska tckningen fr resultatramverket fr generaldirektoratet fr internationellt samarbete och utveckling och det stt p vilket grannskapspolitikens resultat vervakas och rapporteras.
84 Minutes of the 2104th meeting of the Commission held on Wednesday 5.11.2014 — PV(2014) 2104. 
84 Protokoll frn kommissionens 2104:e mte onsdagen den 5 november 2014 Đ PV(2014) 2104.
Box 21 Box 20 
Ruta 21 Ruta 20
81 Our review showed that these risk areas had been correctly identified by the Commission in a wide range of documents. 
81 Vr genomgng visade att kommissionen har identifierat dessa riskomrden korrekt i en rad dokument.
It also showed the interest for the actions that are being under‐ taken by the Commission to launch an EU development and cooperation results framework. 
Den visade ocks intresset fr de tgrder som kommissionen vidtar fr att lansera ett ramverk fr EU:s utvecklings-och samarbetsresultat.
82 Nevertheless, further actions remain to be taken in order to harness the full potential of the Commission’s initia‐ tives for improved EU development and cooperation results. 5. 
82 Trots detta behver ytterligare tgrder vidtas fr att utnyttja den fulla potentialen i kommissionens initiativ fr att frbttra EU:s utvecklings-och samarbetsresultat. 5.
Conclusions and recommendations 39 5.2. 
Slutsatser och rekommendationer 39 5.2.
Recommendations 83 In order to mitigate the risks identi‐ fied, we formulate the following recommendations. 
Rekommendationer 83 Vi lmnar fljande rekommendationer fr att minska de risker som identifierats.
Recommendation 1 Improve the guidelines for terminology usage and formulation of objectives and indicators The Commission should improve its guidelines to ensure the consistent use of terminology regarding results (outputs, outcomes, impacts) and, where relevant, to formulate SMART objectives and clear indicators for its interventions at all levels. 
Rekommendation 1 Frbttra riktlinjerna fr terminologianvndning och formuleringen av ml och indikatorer Kommissionen br frbttra sina riktlinjer fr att srja fr en konsekvent anvndning av terminologin fr resultat (output, utfall och effekter) och vid behov formulera SMART-ml och tydliga indikatorer fr sina interventioner p alla niver.
Recommendation 2 Establish a clear link between actions and expected results Through its internal guidelines, practi‐ cal tools, project formulation and monitoring processes, the Commission should ensure that a clear link is estab‐ lished between actions and expected results, including cross‐cutting issues. 
Rekommendation 2 Faststlla ett tydligt samband mellan tgrder och frvntade resultat Kommissionen br genom sina interna riktlinjer, praktiska verktyg, projektutformnings- och vervakningsprocesser se till att det finns ett tydligt samband mellan tgrder och frvntade resultat, inklusive vergripande frgor.
Recommendation 3 Improve the information system for reporting results and lessons‐learnt The Commission should improve its information system in order to be able to effectively consolidate and report on the results of its interventions. 
Rekommendation 3 Frbttra informationssystemet fr rapportering av resultat och gjorda lrdomar Kommissionen br frbttra sitt informationssystem fr att effektivt kunna konsolidera och rapportera resultaten av sina interventioner.
This should be complemented by measures enabling the Commission’s evaluation activities to identify useful lessons for subsequent legislation, program‐ ming or action design in the areas concerned. 
Detta br kompletteras av tgrder som gr det mjligt fr kommissionen att i sina utvrderingar identifiera anvndbara lrdomar fr kommande lagstiftning, programplanering eller tgrdsutform-ning p de berrda omrdena.
Recommendation 4 Ensure data availability and quality In all its interventions, the Commis‐ sion should assess data availability and quality, and strive to have sufficient, relevant, reliable and up‐to‐date data on results achieved. 
Rekommendation 4 Skerstlla tillgngen p uppgifter och deras kvalitet Kommissionen br i alla sina interventioner bedma tillgngen till uppgifter och deras kvalitet och efterstrva att ha tillrckliga, relevanta, tillfrlitliga och aktuella uppgifter om de uppndda resultaten.
This should be reflected in its systems and guidelines. 
Detta br terspeglas i kommissionens system och riktlinjer.
Recommendation 5 Assess the risks inherent to the implementation modality before committing financial resources Before committing its financial re‐ sources, and when considering the expected results, the Commission should also assess the risks inherent to its choice of a particular implementa‐ tion modality. 
Rekommendation 5 Bedma riskerna med genomfrandemetoderna innan ekonomiska medel ansls Kommissionen br svl innan den anslr ekonomiska medel som nr den vervger de frvntade resultaten ven bedma riskerna med valet av en viss genomfrandemetod.
Conclusions and recommendations 40 This report was adopted by Chamber III, headed by Mr Karel PINXTEN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 17 November 2015. 
Slutsatser och rekommendationer 40 Denna rapport antogs av revisionsrttens avdelning III, med ledamoten Karel PINXTEN som ordfrande, vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 17 november 2015.
For the Court of Auditors Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA President 
Fr revisionsrtten Vtor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA ordfrande
Induced outputs. Improved public policies, public sector institutions, public spending and public service delivery 4. 
Indirekt output: Frbttring av offentlig politik, offentliga institutioner, offentliga utgifter och tillhandahllande av offentliga tjnster.
Outcomes. Positive responses by beneficiaries – service users and economic actors – to government policy management and service delivery 5. 
Utfall: Positivt gensvar frn mottagare Đ tjnsteanvndare och ekonomiska aktrer Đ p frvaltningen av den offentliga politiken och tillhandahllandet av tjnster.
Other effects by various Government inputs - xxxx - Domestic revenue funding and domestic policy inputs - Other improvements in governance issues (e.g. enhanced decentralisation, application of rule of law, human rights) 1c. 
Đ Bttre makroekonomisk frvaltning och budgetfrvaltning (t.ex. finanspolitik, penningpolitik, handelspolitik och politik fr ekonomisk tillvxt).
Inputs of other external assistance programmes 2c. 
Input frn andra program fr externt bistnd 2c.
Reply of the 42 Commission Executive summary III The nature of the Court’s review is such that it includes examples which sometimes relate to actions undertaken several years ago. 
Bilaga Kommissionens 42 svar Sammanfattning III Revisionsrttens genomgng r utformad p ett sdant stt att den innehller exempel som ibland avser tgrder som genomfrdes fr flera r sedan.
This is in particular true in relation to the examples relating to budget support, for which a number of risks have been addressed through the adoption of revised budget support guidelines in 2012 (see the replies provided to various of the boxes hereafter), as well as for the examples relating to multiannual pro‐ gramming documents (strategy papers or indicative programmes), for which the Commission would like to point out that it has systematically included indicators in the programming documents for the period 2014‐2020. 
Det gller i synnerhet de exempel som avser budgetstd, fr vilket ett antal risker har tgrdats genom antagandet av de reviderade riktlinjerna fr budgetstd under 2012 (se svaren p flera av rutorna nedan), och de exempel som avser flerriga programplaneringsdokument (strategidokument och vgledande program), fr vilka kommissionen skulle vilja ppeka att den systematiskt har angett indikatorer i programplaneringsdokumenten fr perioden 2014Đ2020.
Introduction 07 The Results Framework (RF) is one of the tools for reporting results at output and direct outcome lev‐ els. 
Inledning 07 Resultatramen r ett av verktygen fr resultatrapportering med avseende p niverna fr output och direkt utfall.
Furthermore, several initiatives have been taken to improve the whole Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system to improve the Commis‐ sion's results‐oriented approach. 
Vidare har flera initiativ tagits fr att frbttra hela vervaknings-och utvrderingssystemet fr att frbttra kommissionens resultatinriktade strategi.
10 The Staff Working Document (SWD) on the ‘MORE framework’ describes the various existing frame‐ works for monitoring, evaluation and reporting on the implementation of the multiannual financial framework (MFF). 
10 Arbetsdokumentet frn kommissionens avdelningar (SWD) om ÓMORE-ramenÓ beskriver flera befintliga ramar fr vervakning, utvrdering och rapportering om genomfrandet av den flerriga budgetramen.
In terms of objectives and indica‐ tors, it describes what has been set up in the legal acts establishing 2014‐2020 financing instruments and complemented under the 2014 and 2015 budg‐ etary programme statements as well as the moni‐ toring, evaluation and reporting tools as included in the Annual Management Plans (AMP) and Annual Activity Reports (AAR). 
Nr det gller ml och indikatorer beskriver arbetsdokumentet vad som har faststllts i rttsakterna om finansieringsinstrumenten 2014Đ2020, som kompletterats inom ramen fr de budgetmssiga programfrklaringarna fr 2014 och 2015, liksom verktygen fr vervakning, utvrdering och rapportering som ingr i de rliga frvaltningsplanerna och de rliga verksamhetsrapporterna.
For external assis‐ tance instruments, it also refers to the new Results Framework as one of the tools for monitoring and reporting on the implementation of the MFF. 
Fr externa bistndsinstrument hnvisar dokumentet ven till den nya resultatramen som ett av verktygen fr vervakning och rapportering om genomfrandet av den flerriga budgetramen.
Our review 22 The nature of the Court’s review is such that it includes examples which sometimes relate to actions undertaken several years ago. 
Vr genomgng 22 Revisionsrttens genomgng innehller exempel som ibland avser tgrder som genomfrdes fr flera r sedan.
This is in particular true in relation to the examples relating to multiannual programming documents (strategy papers or indicative programmes), for which the Commission would like to point out that it has sys‐ tematically included indicators in the programming documents for the period 2014‐2020, as well as in relation to the examples relating to budget support, for which a number of risks have been addressed through the adoption of revised budget support guidelines in 2012. 
Det gller i synnerhet de exempel som avser flerriga programplaneringsdokument (strategidokument och vgledande program), fr vilka kommissionen skulle vilja ppeka att den systematiskt har angett indikatorer i programplaneringsdokumenten fr perioden 2014Đ2020, liksom de exempel som avser budgetstd, fr vilket ett antal risker har tgrdats genom antagandet av de reviderade riktlinjerna fr budgetstd under 2012.
The Commission also refers to its replies to the Court’s special reports in question and to the addi‐ tional replies to the Court’s observations in the pre‐ sent report with respect to some of the examples so as to underline one or more aspects it considers more specifically relevant in the context of its reply to those observations. 
Kommissionen hnvisar ocks till sina svar p revisionsrttens srskilda rapporter i frga och till de ytterligare svaren p revisionsrttens iakttagelser i frevarande rapport med avseende p ngra av exemplen fr att understryka en eller flera aspekter som den anser vara srskilt relevanta inom ramen fr sitt svar p dessa iakttagelser.
Key risk areas 26 The Commission is aware and agrees with the Court on the need to ensure consistency in terms of the terminology used. 
Centrala riskomrden 26 Kommissionen r medveten om och verens med revisionsrtten om behovet av att skerstlla att den anvnda terminologin r enhetlig.
In the Staff Working Document (SWD) of 26 March 2015 ‘Launching the EU Inter‐ national Cooperation and Development Results Framework’, the terminology input‐output‐out‐ come‐impact is used, corresponding to the inter‐ nationally practised OECD‐DAC results terminology and being also in line with the one used in the 2014‐2020 financing instruments. 
I arbetsdokumentet (SWD) av den 26 mars 2015, Launching the EU International Cooperation and Development Results Framework (lansering av ramverket fr resultatet av EU:s internationella utvecklings-och samarbetstgrder), anvnds terminologin input/ output/utfall/effekter, vilket verensstmmer med den terminologi som tillmpas internationellt fr OECD-DAC:s resultat.
The same termi‐ nology is used in the new Action Document tem‐ plate (applicable as of 1st January 2015) and in the new Results Oriented Monitoring (ROM) Handbook (‘Handbook on ROM reviews and support to end‐of‐ project results reporting’) (March 2015). 
Den verensstmmer ven med den terminologi som anvnds i finansieringsinstrumenten fr 2014Đ2020. Samma terminologi anvnds i den nya mallen fr tgrdsdokument (tillmplig frn den 1 januari 2015) och i den nya handboken om resultatinriktad vervakning (Handbook on ROM reviews and support to end-of-project results reporting) (mars 2015).
Reply of the Commission 43 Box 1 The terminology used in EuropeAid’s Annual Man‐ agement Plan is following the one foreseen in the Commission’s Secretariat‐General and DG Budget overall instructions for the establishment of the management plans by the Commission’s general directorates and services. 
Kommissionens svar 43 Ruta 1 Den terminologi som anvnds i EuropeAids rliga frvaltningsplan fljer den som faststlls i de allmnna anvisningarna frn kommissionens generalsekretariat och GD Budget fr kommissionens generaldirektorats och avdelningars upprttande av frvaltningsplaner.
The risk as set out in the example given in Box 1 refers to the terminology used in the Results Oriented Monitoring (ROM) Handbook applicable to the previous ROM system which ended in spring 2014. 
Den risk som anges i exemplet i ruta 1 avser den terminologi som anvnds i handboken om resultatinriktad vervakning som var tillmplig p det tidigare systemet fr resultatinriktad vervakning, som slutade att anvndas under vren 2014.
It has been replaced by a new ROM system and a new ROM Handbook introduced in spring 2015, which no longer contains such reference and is fully in line with internationally practiced lan‐ guage applying the reference to SMART objectives and not to indicators. 
Det har ersatts av ett nytt system fr resultatinriktad vervakning och en ny handbok brjade anvndas under vren 2015. Den nya handboken innehller inte lngre denna referens och ligger helt i linje med internationellt tillmpat sprkbruk som anvnder referensen SMART p ml men inte p indikatorer.
Accordingly, the Commission will modify the next budget circular. 
Kommissionen kommer drfr att ndra nsta budgetskrivelse i enlighet med detta.
Moreover, the Commission intends to refine the language and instructions related to the objec‐ tives and indicators to be used in the context of the budgetary circular. 
Kommissionen avser vidare att precisera sprket och de anvisningar som avser ml och indikatorer som ska anvndas inom ramen fr budgetskrivel-sen.
The Commission agrees that objectives and expected results should as much as possible be SMART but also considers that this is in many cases not easy to implement. 
Kommissionen hller med om att SMART ska anvndas p ml och frvntade resultat i den utstrckning det r mjligt, men anser ocks att detta mnga gnger r svrt.
This is particularly true where expected results can only reasonably be measured in qualitative terms and cannot be quan‐ tified which is inter alia the case for results of broad policies or financing instruments. 
Det r srskilt fallet nr de frvntade resultaten endast rimligen kan mtas i kvalitativa termer och inte kan kvantifieras, vilket bland annat gller fr resultaten med avseende p vergripande politik eller finansieringsinstrument.
Corporate results frameworks, by nature, focus on quantitative results, as mentioned in the Staff Working Document ‘Launching the EU International Cooperation and Development Results Framework’ (EU RF). 
Gemensamma resultatramar fokuserar till sin natur p kvantitativa resultat, vilket ptalas i arbetsdokumentet Launching the EU International Cooperation and Development Results Framework (EU:s resultatram).
Indicators in the EU RF have been set as much as possible following RACER criteria (‘Rel‐ evant, Accepted, Credible, Easy, and Robust’) — as set out in Eurostat’s indicator guidance, referred to by the Court. 
Indikatorerna i EU:s resultatram har i den mn det varit mjligt faststllts enligt RACER-kriterierna (ÓRelevant, Accepted, Credible, Easy, and RobustÓ) enligt vad som anges i Eurostats riktlinjer fr indikatorer, som revisionsrtten hnvisar till.
29 The Commission agrees that the broad variety of the documents referred to by the Court increases the risk of inconsistencies. 
29 Kommissionen delar uppfattningen att den stora mngd dokument som revisionsrtten hnvisar till kar risken fr ofrenlighet.
Taking into account that the documents are adopted at different stages of policy formulation and the project and programme management cycle (including the programming phase) it necessarily results in adjustments and more specific types of focus in implementation. 
Dokumenten antas i olika faser av cykeln fr utformning av politiken och projekt-och programfrvaltning (inklusive programplaneringsfasen) och detta leder ovillkorligen till justeringar och mer specifikt fokus i samband med genomfrandet.
The Commission has taken measures to reduce the risks mentioned by the Court. 
Kommissionen har vidtagit tgrder fr att minska de risker som uppmrksammas av revisionsrtten.
Thus, in the 2014‐ 2020 programming exercise, country, regional and thematic programming documents have been systematically reviewed in order to ensure expected results and indicators are of appropriate quality (i.e. measurable) and of a manageable number (see the programming documents at http://eeas.europa.eu/ around/index_en.htm). 
I programplaneringsarbetet fr 2014Đ2020 har sledes landspecifika, regionala och tematiska dokument granskats systematiskt fr att se till att de frvntade resultaten och indikatorerna r av lmplig kvalitet (dvs. mtbara) och i ett hanterbart antal (se programplaneringsdokumenten p http:// eeas.europa.eu/around/index_sv.htm).
The revision of the Action Document template (in force as of 1 January 2015) and the ongoing revision of the related internal Quality Support Group docu‐ ments aim to ensure that expected results and indi‐ cators are properly included in Action documents. 
Omarbetningen av mallen fr tgrdsdokument (i kraft frn den 1 januari 2015) och den pgende omarbetningen av de relaterade dokumenten frn den interna kvalitetsstdsgruppen har som syfte att se till att frvntade resultat och indikatorer anges p rtt stt i tgrdsdokumenten.
Furthermore, the Commission’s services are working on the improvement of the Monitoring and Evalu‐ ation system, including room for adjustment that may be needed over implementation of the actions and the flexibility that is required to implement such adjustments in order to adapt to changing country contexts and policies. 
Kommissionens avdelningar arbetar dessutom med att frbttra vervaknings-och utvrderingssyste-met. Detta inbegriper utrymme fr de justeringar som kan behvas under genomfrandet av tgrderna och den flexibilitet som r ndvndig fr att genomfra dessa justeringar fr att anpassa tgrderna efter skiftande frhllanden i lnder och politikomrden.
32 The Commission has taken and is taking measures to reduce the risks mentioned by the Court. 
32 Kommissionen har vidtagit och hller p att vidta tgrder fr att minska de risker som uppmrksammas av revisionsrtten.
See Commission reply to paragraph 29. 
Se kommissionens svar p punkt 29.
Box 4 In compliance with recommendation 2 on the development of performance indicators made by the Court in the Special Report 14/2013, the Com‐ mission developed a results‐oriented framework that includes indicators to monitor the progresses of the Palestinian Authority in its reforms. 
Ruta 4 I enlighet med rekommendation 2 om utvecklingen av resultatindikatorer som lmnades av revisionsrtten i dess srskilda rapport 14/2013 har kommissionen utvecklat en resultatinriktad ram som innehller indikatorer fr vervakning av den palestinska myndighetens reformframsteg.
Reply of the Commission 44 The results‐oriented framework, which has been developed in coordination with the World Bank and with EU Member States in the framework of the EU Local Development Strategy, was agreed with the Palestinian Authority through a Memorandum of Understanding signed on 25 March 2015. 
Kommissionens svar 44 Den resultatinriktade ramen, som har utvecklats i samordning med Vrldsbanken och EU:s medlemsstater inom ramen fr EU:s lokala utvecklingsstrategi, beslutades med den palestinska myndigheten genom ett samfrstndsavtal som undertecknades den 25 mars 2015.