natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission’s response is appropriate Main priorities were well established 18 In the AGL region, the Commission’s overall objective is ‘to address urgent needs arising from population movements in conflict zone and life-threatening situations in non-conflict areas using the most appropriate response mechanisms’17. 
Kommissionens tgrder r lmpliga Huvudprioriteringarna var vl frankrade 18 I omrdet kring de afrikanska stora sjarna r kommissionens vergripande ml att tillgodose akuta behov som uppstr vid folkfrflyttningar i konfliktomrden och livshotande situationer i icke konfliktdrabbade omrden med hjlp av de lmpligaste tgrdsmekanismernaÓ17.
There are five ‘strategic objectives’ which lead to six envisaged actions/priorities (see Box 2). 
Det finns fem Óstrategiska mlÓ som leder till sex planerade insatser/prioriteringar (se ruta 2).
They are all in line with the Union’s principal objectives for humanitarian aid (see Box 1 in paragraph 4) and they allow the needs identified to be addressed. 
De stmmer alla verens med de viktigaste mlen fr EU:s humanitra bistnd (se punkt 4 i ruta 1) och gr att kartlagda ml kan tillgodoses.
All the interventions have to target the most vulnerable populations. 
Alla insatser mste rikta sig till de mest utsatta befolkningarna.
17 HIP AGL 2015 version 4, point 4) envisaged ECHO response, p. 
17 Punkt 4 i fjrde versionen av HIP fr omrdet kring de afrikanska stora sjarna, planerad Echo-tgrd, s.
Observations 15 Main priorities: (a) reducing protection risks and addressing protection needs, (b) providing minimum basic services, health, food and NFI as fast as possible in emergency situations, (c) providing support to the management of refugee camps in the region, (d) providing water, hygiene and sanitation activities in areas at risk, outside conflict zones, (e) giving priority to multi-sector approaches, and (f) supporting coordination, security and logistics. 
Iakttagelser 15 Huvudprioriteringar: a) Minska skyddsrisker och tillgodose skyddsbehov. b) Tillhandahlla ett minimum av grundlggande tjnster, hlso-och sjukvrd, livsmedel och andra artiklar n livsmedel s snabbt som mjligt i ndsituationer. c) Ge std till frvaltningen av flyktinglger i omrdet. d) Tillhandahlla vattentjnster, hygienrelaterade och sanitra tjnster i riskomrden utanfr konfliktdrabbade omrden. e) Prioritera sektorsvergripande strategier. f) Ge std till samordning, skerhet och logistik.
19 The main constraints faced by the Commission, and donors in general, are in the DRC. 
19 Kommissionen och givare i allmnhet stter p de strsta svrigheterna i Demokratiska republiken Kongo.
They are related to the challenging logistics in such a large country, the poor state of infrastructure and the lack of government’s capacity and willingness to contribute. 
De gller den svra logistiken i ett s stort land, infrastrukturens dliga skick och regeringens bristande kapacitet och vilja att bidra.
The lack of partners in some parts of the country may also limit the capacity to make interventions. 
Att det saknas partner i vissa delar av landet kan ocks gra det svrt att ingripa.
Finally, the security constraints, due to the constant shifting of military operations and subsequent movements of armed groups, curtail the activities of the donors, especially in the most remote areas. 
Slutligen inskrnks givarnas verksamheter av skerhetsbegrnsningarna, som beror p de konstanta frndringarna i militra operationer och de vpnade gruppernas frflyttningar som fljer av dem, framfr allt i de mest avlgsna omrdena.
20 The Commission’s response is consistent with the analysis of the situation and needs assessment. 
20 Kommissionens tgrder ligger i linje med lgesanalysen och behovsbedmningen.
Both are consistent with the response described in the DRC’s Annual Humanitarian Action Plan (HAP) prepared by a team of humanitarian organisations representatives. 
Bda stmmer verens med de tgrder som beskrivs i Demokratiska republiken Kongos rliga handlingsplan fr humanitra insatser, som tas fram av ett team bestende av fretrdare fr humanitra organisationer.
The Commission’s funding is driven by the most acute needs of the most vulnerable populations on the basis of the partners experience in the field, corroborated by the information shared by the humanitarian coordinator and the knowledge of the staff. 
Kommissionens finansiering styrs av de mest utsatta befolkningarnas mest akuta behov utifrn partnernas erfarenhet p fltet, som bekrftas genom de uppgifter som den humanitra samordnaren delar med sig av och personalens kunskaper.
Further prioritisation, mainly geographical, is done at the selection stage (see paragraph 25). 
Ytterligare prioriteringarar, frmst geografiska, grs p urvalsstadiet (se punkt 25).
22 The Commission carries out a mid-term review of the HIPs on the basis of the subsequent year’s needs assessment. 
22 Kommissionen gr en halvtidsversyn av planerna fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd utifrn det pfljande rets behovsbedmning.
Moreover, the HIP is revised any time the evolution of the situation triggers a modification of the allocated amount. 
Dessutom revideras planen varje gng det anslagna beloppet ndras p grund av att situationen har frndrats.
When an increase of the initial allocation is approved, the additional funding can be obtained from the operational reserve, an amount of approximately 20 % of the annual budget set aside for unexpected emergencies. 
Nr en kning av det ursprungliga anslaget godknns kan den ytterligare finansieringen hmtas frn den operativa reserven, ett belopp som motsvarar ungefr 20 % av den rliga budgeten och som lagts undan fr ofrutsedda ndsituationer.
It may also be obtained from the EU EAR or from the EDF budget. 
Det kan ocks hmtas frn budgeten fr EU:s reserv fr katastrofbistnd eller EUF-budgeten.
23 For the AGL region, this flexibility has been used several times during the period under review to address the consequences of unexpected events or deteriorating situation (see Graph 2). 
23 I omrdet kring de afrikanska stora sjarna har man flera gnger under den granskade perioden utnyttjat denna flexibilitet fr att hantera fljderna av ofrutsedda hndelser eller en frsmring av situationen (se diagram 2).
In 2015 alone, due mainly to the Burundian refugee crisis18, the HIP for the AGL region was modified three times. 
Bara under 2015 ndrades planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd tre gnger, frmst p grund av flyktingkrisen i Burundi18.
24 In addition, the AGL region operational team set aside a small share of the HIP’s allocation (approximately 1.5 million euros in 2015) for sudden increases in needs in the course of the year. 
24 Dessutom lgger det operativa teamet i omrdet kring de afrikanska stora sjarna undan en liten andel av anslaget i planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd (cirka 1,5 miljoner euro 2015) till pltsligt kade behov under ret.
This was used as a top-up for ongoing projects dealing with refugee camps in Rwanda and Tanzania as soon as it became known that high numbers of Burundians were fleeing the country at the end of April 2015. 
Denna andel anvndes till att skjuta till medel till pgende projekt som frvaltade flyktinglger i Rwanda och Tanzania s fort det blev knt att mnga burundier var p flykt frn sitt land i slutet av april 2015.
This allowed a prompt reaction while waiting for the approval of the first increase of the HIP which took place at the end of May. 
Det mjliggjorde en snabb reaktion i vntan p att den frsta kningen frn planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd skulle godknnas, vilket skedde i slutet av maj.
18 2 million euros were also added to the initial 2015 allocation for the AGL region because of the inflow of ± 80 000 of Central Africans to the DRC. 
18 Tv miljoner euro lades ocks till det ursprungliga anslaget 2015 fr omrdet kring de afrikanska stora sjarna p grund av infldet av ungefr 80 000 centralafrikaner till Demokratiska republiken Kongo.
Observations 17 Budget of the AGL region for the period 2011‐2015 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EU budget ad-hoc decisions EDF ad-hoc decisions HIP updates HIP initial amount 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Burundian crisis M23 rebellion in North Kivu Deterioration of the situation in Katanga due to conflicts Deterioration of nutritional situation in DRC and Burundi 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: European Court of Auditors. millioneuro Graph 2 
Iakttagelser 17 Budget fr omrdet kring de afrikanska stora sjarna fr perioden 2011Đ2015 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 EU:s budget srskilda beslut EUF srskilda beslut HIP: uppdateringar HIP: ursprungligt belopp M23-uppror i Nordkivu Frsmring av lget i Katanga p grund av konflikter Frsmring av nringstillstndet i Demokratiska republiken Kongo och Burundi Kris i Burundi 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Klla: Europeiska revisionsrtten. miljoner euro Diagram 2
Observations 18 Mahama refugee camp in Rwanda, newly built area hosting Burundian refugees Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Iakttagelser 18 Flyktinglgret Mahama i Rwanda, nybyggt omrde som tar emot flyktingar frn Burundi Klla: Europeiska revisionsrtten.
Insufficient transparency at the project selection stage Geographical priorities in areas of conflict are not documented 25 In the HIP, the geographical area of intervention corresponding to the conflict zones is Eastern Congo, which includes North Kivu, South Kivu and the different regions of the former province Katanga. 
Otillrcklig insyn i frfarandet fr att vlja ut projekt Geografiska prioriteringar i konfliktomrden dokumenteras inte 25 Det geografiska insatsomrde som motsvarar konfliktomrdena i planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd r stra Kongo, som inbegriper Nordkivu, Sydkivu och de olika regionerna i den fre detta provinsen Katanga.
In a volatile environment such as that in the DRC, more precise areas, where the most acute needs and most vulnerable populations are to be found, cannot be determined in advance. 
I en s ombytlig milj som den i Demokratiska republiken Kongo r det omjligt att p frhand faststlla mer exakt vilka omrden som har de mest akuta behoven och de mest utsatta befolkningarna.
Picture 2 
Bild 2
Observations 19 26 According to the Commission, just before the assessment of the funding requests, the operational team defines top priority areas for allocating its support on the basis of information gathered on movements of the armed groups, including the FARDC, movements of population and the presence of partners. 
Iakttagelser 19 26 Enligt kommissionen faststller det operativa teamet, precis innan de bedmer finansieringsanskningarna, de prioriterade omrden som frmst ska f std utifrn information som samlats in om vpnade gruppers frflyttningar, dribland FARDC, folkfrflyttningar och partnernas nrvaro.
However, as this was not documented it was not possible to ascertain whether these geographical priorities were soundly based and whether the selected projects took place in top priority areas. 
Men eftersom detta inte dokumenterades gick det inte att frskra sig om huruvida de geografiska prioriteringarna hade en tillfrlitlig grund och om de utvalda projekten genomfrdes i de prioriterade omrdena.
The selection process is not well documented 27 Over the period under review, 2011-2015, the Commission received on average 71 funding requests per year, following the first publication of the HIP, and selected around half of them. 
Urvalsfrfarandet dokumenteras inte ordentligt 27 Under den granskade perioden, 2011Đ2015, fick kommissionen i genomsnitt 71 finansieringsanskningar om ret, efter det frsta offentliggrandet av planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd, och valde ut ungefr hlften av dem.
Depending on the evolution of the situation and the advent of new/increased needs in the course of the year, the Commission finally supported an average of 40 projects. 
Beroende p hur situationen utvecklades och tillkomsten av nya/ka-de behov under ret gav kommissionen till slut std till i genomsnitt 40 projekt.
The repartition of the HIP allocation is shown in Graph 1. 
Frdelningen av anslaget i planerna genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd visas i diagram 1.
28 Partners receive comprehensive guidance regarding their funding requests which are submitted in an electronic exchange system in a predetermined format. 
28 Partnerna fr omfattande vgledning nr det gller finansieringsanskningarna som lmnas in via ett elektroniskt utbytessystem i ett fast format.
All of these are assessed by the operational teams in Brussels and in the field and are discussed among these teams19. 
De operativa teamen i Bryssel och p fltet bedmer och diskuterar dem19.
They present the final outcome of the selection in an internal document for decision. 
De presenterar slutresultatet av urvalet i ett internt dokument fr beslut.
For the selected funding requests, the appraisal part of a document used for managing the project is then completed. 
Sedan fyller de i bedmningsdelen avseende de utvalda finansieringsanskningarna i det dokument som anvnds till frvaltningen av projektet.
This document provides information for each significant stage of the project cycle: funding request, interim report, field visits, modification requests and final report. 
Dokumentet innehller information om varje viktigt steg i projektcykeln: finansieringsanskan, delrapport, fltbesk, begran om ndringar och slutrapport.
29 However, this appraisal part is not structured in such a way to demonstrate clearly that the criteria and general principles, detailed in the annex of the HIP, were assessed for each proposal. 
29 Men bedmningsdelen r inte strukturerad p ett stt som tydligt visar att man har bedmt kriterierna och de allmnna principerna, som beskrivs nrmare i bilagan till planen, fr varje frslag.
Some key aspects such as the partner’s implementation capacity, the partner’s knowledge of the country/region, protection and resilience aspects are not mentioned at all. 
Vissa centrala aspekter som partnernas genom-frandekapacitet, partnernas kunskaper om landet/omrdet, aspekter avseende skydd och motstndskraft nmns inte alls.
For the projects examined, which were all in line with the main priorities and objectives set in the HIP, some general principles were not systematically assessed20 or some of the assessments were weak21. 
Vissa allmnna principer bedmdes inte systematiskt eller endast bristflligt20 i de granskade projekten, som alla var i linje med huvudprioriteringarna och mlen i planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd21.
From the information available it was not possible to determine the comparative merits of the funding requests submitted and therefore to conclude that the most relevant projects were selected. 
Utifrn den tillgngliga informationen gick det inte att bedma de komparativa frdelarna med de inlmnade finansieringsanskningarna och drmed inte heller att dra slutsatsen att de mest relevanta projekten valdes ut.
19 The bulk of the funding requests are submitted around the indicative date mentioned in the first version of the HIP, usually towards year end or at the beginning of the subsequent year. 
19 De flesta finansieringsanskningar lmnas in runt det vgledande datum som anges i den frsta versionen av planen fr genomfrande av tgrder fr humanitrt bistnd, vanligtvis mot rets slut eller i brjan av det pfljande ret.
20 (1) Adaptation to the specific needs related to gender and age. 
21 1) Anpassning till de srskilda behov som gller kn och lder.
(2) Integration of resilience activities by identifying the possibilities to reduce potential risks for vulnerable people and to reinforce their livelihood, this also includes the recommendation from the Commission to its partners to explore from the beginning possible synergies and complementarities with development and national actors. 
2) Integrering av insatser som ska ka motstndskraften genom att hitta stt att minska potentiella risker fr utsatta mnniskor och strka deras frsrjningsmjligheter; i detta ingr ven kommissionens rekommendation till partnerna att frn brjan utforska mjliga synergieffekter och komplementaritet med utvecklingsaktrer och nationella aktrer.
(3) Integration of protection activities which objective is to reduce physical and psychological insecurity for persons and groups under threat. 
3) Integrering av skydds-aktiviteter med mlet att minska fysisk och psykologisk otrygghet fr hotade personer och grupper.
Observations 20 Cost efficiency is not analysed 30 The budgets provided with the funding requests for the projects examined were not detailed and were not analysed prior to selection. 
Iakttagelser 20 Kostnadseffektiviteten analyseras inte 30 De budgetar som tfljde finansieringsanskningarna fr de granskade projekten specificerades och analyserades inte fre urvalet.
Thus no assessments of these were made to determine if the proposed costs were reasonable. 
Sledes gjorde man ingen bedmning av om de freslagna kostnaderna fr dem var rimliga.
In the case of partners, usually UN agencies sub-contracting activities to implementing bodies, there was no information on the level of funding that went to these bodies. 
Nr det gller partnerna, som vanligtvis var FN-organ som lade ut verksamhet p entreprenad till genomfrandeorgan, fanns det ingen information om hur stor finansiering dessa organ fick.
Moreover, in the absence of adequate checks to ascertain that the budget is reasonable at the selection stage, subsequent analyses on the execution of this budget have limited use. Overall, the Commission’s monitoring is appropriate although the information obtained could be better used 32 We examined whether the Commission obtained adequate information from project reporting to monitor progress and took appropriate and timely measures when needed. 
Nr det dessutom saknas ordentliga kontroller fr att garantera att budgeten r rimlig p urvalsstadiet r de efterfljande analyserna av budgetgenomfrandet av begrnsad nytta. verlag r kommissionens vervakning lmplig men den inhmtade informationen skulle kunna utnyttjas bttre 32 Vi underskte om kommissionen fick tillrcklig information i projektrapporterna fr att kunna vervaka framsteg och om den i tid vidtog de tgrder som krvdes.
In most cases, the Commission obtains adequate information on project implementation The monitoring framework in place is appropriate 33 This framework is based on: (a) an interim report, due 3 months before the end of actions whose duration exceeds 10 months, and a final report, to be submitted within 3 months following the end of the project and triggering the final payment (see Annex V); (b) a minimum of one field visit per project by Commission staff, provided that security or logistical constraints allow for that22. 
I de flesta fall fr kommissionen tillrcklig information om projektgenomfrandet Det finns en lmplig vervakningsram 33 Ramen grundas p fljande: a) En delrapport, som ska lmnas in tre mnader innan insatser som varar lngre n tio mnader avslutas, och en slutrapport, som ska lmnas in senast tre mnader efter det att projektet har avslutats och som leder till slutbetalningen (se bilaga V). b) Kommissionens personal ska gra minst ett fltbesk per projekt om de skerhetsmssiga eller logistiska begrnsningarna tillter det22.
22 Any exception should be justified as it was the case for two projects in our sample. 
22 Eventuella undantag ska motiveras, vilket var fallet med tv projekt i vrt urval.
Observations 21 34 In addition, the Commission carries out periodic, usually annual, assessments of the partners, focused on their financial soundness. 
Iakttagelser 21 34 Kommissionen gr dessutom regelbundna bedmningar av partnerna som handlar om deras ekonomiska soliditet, i regel en gng om ret.
The Commission also supervises audits, sub-contracted to external audit firms, at partners’ headquarters and in the field. 
Kommissionen vervakar ven de revisioner som lggs ut p entreprenad till externa revisionsbyrer vid partnernas huvudkontor och p fltet.
Considering the nature of the actions and their duration, the monitoring framework in place is satisfactory. 
Med hnsyn till insatsernas karaktr och varaktighet r den vervakningsram som finns tillfredsstllande.
The timeliness and quality of some reporting was unsatisfactory 35 Interim and final reports are submitted through an electronic exchange system in a predetermined format. 
Flera rapporter var frsenade och inte av tillrckligt hg kvalitet 35 Del-och slutrapporterna lmnas in i ett fast format via ett elektroniskt utbytes-system.
They should include updated operational information, on the values reached per indicator and financial information, namely the budget consumption, to allow the Commission to conclude on the progress of an action as a whole. 
De br innehlla aktuell information om verksamheten, om de vrden som uppntts per indikator och finansiell information, srskilt om budgetutnyttjandet, s att kommissionen kan dra en slutsats om hur lngt man har kommit med en insats som helhet.
The analysis of these reports and the reporting on the field visits is entered in its supervision document. 
Analysen av rapporterna och rapporteringen om fltbesken registreras i vervakningsdokumentet.
36 Many interim and final reports were considerably delayed and no explanations for these delays were demanded by the Commission. 
36 Mnga del-och slutrapporter var kraftigt frsenade och kommissionen begrde ingen frklaring till dessa frseningar.
In particular, a high proportion of interim and final reports for projects implemented by UN agencies and IOs was not submitted on time (see Table 1). 
Framfr allt var det en stor andel av de del-och slutrapporter om projekt som genomfrdes av FN-organ och internationella organisationer som inte lmnades in i tid (se tabell 1).
The late submission of interim reports curtails the Commission’s ability to address any problems that may be identified. 
Att delrapporterna lmnas in s sent gr det svrare fr kommissionen att tgrda problem som eventuellt konstateras.
37 While, overall, the quality of the interim reports was satisfactory, we considered that only three out of the 18 final reports23 were satisfactory. 
37 Vi bedmde att kvaliteten p delrapporterna verlag var tillfredsstllande, men endast tre av de 18 slutrapporterna23.
In the 15 other cases, the initial information reported was not sufficient to explain the level of performance achieved, the impossibility of using some indicators or why some activities had not been carried out. 
I de 15 andra fallen var den ursprungliga information som rapporterades inte tillrcklig fr att frklara vilka resultat som hade uppntts, varfr vissa indikatorer inte kunde anvndas eller varfr en del verksamheter inte hade genomfrts.
In some reports supporting documentation for the provided data was missing and financial information was not detailed enough. 
I en del rapporter saknades styrkande underlag fr uppgifterna och den finansiella informationen var inte tillrckligt detaljerad.
In all cases but one24, the Commission requested supplementary explanation from the partners. 
I alla fall utom ett24 begrde kommissionen kompletterande frklaringar frn partnerna.
They provided additional information which in all cases but two25, was deemed satisfactory. 
De lmnade kompletterande information som i alla fall utom tv25 bedmdes vara tillfredsstllande.
23 One final report was not received at the end of the audit. 
23 En slutrapport lmnades inte in frrn nr revisionen hade avslutats.
24 In one case, DG ECHO did not respect the deadlines for reviewing final reports and was not able to send a request for information. 
24 I ett fall respekterade GD Humanitrt bistnd och civilskydd (Echo) inte tidsfristerna fr granskning av slutrapporterna och kunde drfr inte skicka en begran om information.