natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This means that any opportunity for developing cooperation between administrations and socio-economic actors located on either side of the border should be promoted. 
Detta innebr att man mste frmja varje mjlighet att skapa samarbete mellan frvaltningar och socioekonomiska aktrer p bda sidorna om en grns.
These two approaches are not therefore mutually exclusive, as is shown by the examples of targeting on specific problems that the Court quotes in paragraph 58. 
Det ena tillvgagngssttet utesluter inte det andra, vilket framgr av de exempel p probleminriktning som revisionsrtten ger i punkt 58.
The Commission would refer to its replies to paragraphs 26 and 55. 
Kommissionen hnvisar till sina svar angende punkterna 26 och 55.
As the Member States were aware of the essential aspects of the guidelines before they were published and as the Commission was in regular contact with the regions while the proposals were being prepared, the Commission does not think that programmes suffered in quality because of the delay in publishing the guidelines. 
D medlemsstaterna knde till riktlinjernas huvudsakliga innehll redan innan de offentliggjordes och d kommissionen hll regelbunden kontakt med regionerna under tiden som frslagen togs fram anser kommissionen inte att programkvaliteten frsmrades av det faktum att offentliggrandet av riktlinjerna frsenades.
It would refer to its reply to paragraph 28. 
Kommissionen hnvisar till sitt svar angende punkt 28.
They were also the result of the time taken by Member States, who had to talk to each other and reach agreement on the improvements requested by the Commission. 
I vissa fall berodde frseningarna p frsenade svar frn medlemsstaterna som var tvungna att frhandla sinsemellan om de frbttringar som kommissionen freslagit.
As explained in paragraphs 37 and 38, as a rule they took longer in doing this than the Commission did in examining the proposals. 
Som anges i punkterna 37 och 38 tog dessa frhandlingar i regel lngre tid n kommissionens genomgng.
As regards the low take-up of payment appropriations, the Commission would refer to its reply to paragraph 39. 
Nr det gller det lga utnyttjandet av betalningsbemyndigandena hnvisar kommissionen till sitt svar angende punkt 39.
Because of the search for the essential consensus in programmes involving a number of Member States and the very purpose of the programmes, CIPs are targeted at enhanced cooperation and not at predetermined sectors of activity. 
Med tanke p att det inom de program som omfattar flera medlemsstater krvs att konsensus ns och med tanke p sjlva mlet med programmen inriktas de grnsverskridande programmen p ett kat samarbete och inte p i frvg faststllda verksamhetssektorer.
The Commission would also refer to its replies to paragraphs 58 and 59. 
Kommissionen hnvisar till sina svar angende punkterna 58 och 59.
The Commission believes that improvements are still necessary in terms of shared structures, and it is reassuring to note that in most cases there is a single financial plan, despite the fact that the resources allocated to the structural funds are distributed by Member States. 
Kommissionen anser att det fortfarande krvs frbttringar av de gemensamma strukturerna och att det r gldjande att principen om en enda gemensam finansieringsplan iakttagits i de flesta fall trots att de medel som avsatts fr strukturfonderna frdelats per medlemsstat.
7.12.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 303/35 88. 
7.12.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 303/35 88.
The Commission would refer to its reply to paragraph 52. 
Kommissionen hnvisar till sitt svar angende punkt 52.
As the Commission explained in paragraph 63, the bottom-up approach brings out concerns not identified by expert analysis. 
Som anges i punkt 63 innebr en bottom-up-strategi att man ven mste ta hnsyn till faktorer som inte ingick i expert-analysen.
These concerns of regional and local authorities are used in cross-border areas in addition to expert studies to determine strategy and priorities. 
De regionala och lokala myndigheternas intressen mste jmkas samman med expertanalysen vid faststllandet av en strategi och prioriteringar.
It is difficult to measure the impact of CIPs because of the intangible nature of cooperation objectives (see the reply to paragraph 73). 
Resultaten av de grnsverskridande programmen r svra att mta p grund av att mlen fr samarbetet r av immateriell karaktr (se svaret angende punkt 73).
The Commission pays attention to the analysis of the starting situation. 
Kommissionen tar hnsyn till analysen av ursprungssituationen.
The principal objective of cross-border CIPs is to develop cross-border economic and social centres through joint strategies for sustainable territorial development and not only to resolve problems directly linked to borders. 
Det vergripande mlet med de grnsverskridande programmen r att skapa grnsverskridande ekonomiska och sociala center genom gemensamma strategier fr varaktig territoriell utveckling, och inte enbart att lsa grnsrelaterade problem.
The main concern is to overcome the major handicap of these areas which lies in the weak links between actors who are located close to each other but in different Member States. 
Den strsta utmaningen r att bemstra de svrigheter som drabbar grnsregionerna p grund av att banden mellan olika aktrer r svaga p grund av att de befinner sig i olika medlemsstater.
The objective set by the Commission in its guidelines for strand C, namely Ôimproving regional development policies and instrumentsŐ, responds to a need which can be identified only by the public authorities concerned by comparing their own policies with those of their counterparts in other Member States. 
Mlet att gra politik och instrument fr regional utveckling och sammanhllning mer effektiva som faststlls fr del C i kommissionens riktlinjer syftar till att tgrda behov som endast kan faststllas av de berrda myndigheterna genom att de jmfr sin politik med den politik som bedrivs av motsvarande myndigheter i andra medlemsstater.
The Commission and the Member States therefore agreed to define indicators pragmatically after examining the first series of selected projects. 
Kommissionen och medlemsstaterna har drfr enats om ett pragmatiskt tillvgagngsstt dr indikatorerna kommer att faststllas efter det att den frsta serien av godknda projekt gtts igenom.
Complementarity is to be found principally in the cross-border cooperation element which is additional to traditional economic development. 
Det r framfr allt det grnsverskridande samarbetet som fungerar som komplement till den klassiska ekonomiska utvecklingen.
In this connection the Commission believes that exchange of experience is a way of improving the know-how of the bodies involved and, in some cases, a prerequisite for the development of innovative actions and better use of public funds. 
Kommissionen menar att erfarenhetsutbytet ofta kar graden av know-how hos de deltagande organen och att utbytet i vissa fall fungerar som ett incitament till innovativa tgrder och till ett bttre utnyttjande av offentliga medel.
As explained in the reply to paragraph 63, the bottom-up approach involves taking account of the partnersŐ opinions in determining objectives and not just the SWOT analysis. In addition, the general objective of cross-border CIPs is to develop cooperation between administrations and organisations of all kinds located on the two sides of the border (see paragraph 58). 
Som anges i svaret angende punkt 63 innebr en bottom-up-strategi att man ven mste ta hnsyn till partnernas sikter och inte bara till SWOT-analysen.  andra sidan r det allmnna mlet fr de grnsverskridande programmen att skapa samarbete mellan alla former av frvaltningar och organisationer p bda sidorna om en grns (se punkt 58).
The Interact programme is an indication of the importance the Commission and the Member States attach to improving the design and implementation of these programmes by exchanging methods and experience between managers, Member States and the Commission. (a) The Commission is looking into the problems with indicators in the mid-term reviews (see reply to paragraph 73). (b) The Court itself observes (paragraph 67) that most of the projects selected so far satisfy the trans-European criterion. The Commission does not believe that projects should be concerned solely with resolving specific border-related problems (see paragraphs 58 and 63). 
Interact-programmet visar vilken vikt kommissionen och medlemsstaterna lgger vid att frbttra utarbetandet och genomfrandet av programmen genom erfarenhetsutbyte mellan projektledarna, medlemsstaterna och kommissionen. a) Kommissionen undersker problem med indikatorerna i samband med halvtidsrapporterna (se svar angende punkt 73). b) Revisionsrtten konstaterar sjlv (punkt 67) att huvudparten av de projekt som hittills godknts uppfyller kravet p transeuropeisk karaktr.  andra sidan anser kommissionen att projekten inte enbart skall fungera som lsningar p grnsrelaterade problem (se punkterna 58 och 63).
98. (a) The Interact programme also helps to prepare the future. 
98. a) Interact-programmet innebr ocks att man frbereder sig fr framtida behov.
However, the Commission believes that in view of the different situations which exist, the analyses must be conducted border by border within a wide-ranging partnership on the responsibility of the authorities in charge of the cross-border programmes and not on the CommissionŐs responsibility. (b) For all the objectives of the forthcoming programming period 2007 to 2013, the Commission will propose that the Council adopt strategic EU guidelines for cohesion policy. 
Med tanke p att det r frga om en sdan mngfald av olika situationer anser kommissionen emellertid att analyserna br gras frn grnsomrde till grnsomrde inom ramen fr ett omfattande partnerskap som skall lyda under de myndigheter som ansvarar fr de grnsverskridande programmen och inte under kommissionen. b) Infr nsta programperiod kommer kommissionen, avseende samtliga ml, att fresl att rdet antar strategiska riktlinjer fr unionens sammanhllningspolitik.
These guidelines will serve as a framework for preparing and implementing fund programming, including the European territorial cooperation objective. (e) The Commission will present the guidelines and methodology documents before the next programming period gets under way. (g) The Commission has announced that programme complements will be dropped in the next programming period. (h) The Commission will consider the CourtŐs recommendation when preparing the new period. (i) The Commission will propose a specific Council regulation on this subject. 
Sdana riktlinjer kan ligga till grund fr frberedelserna och genomfrandet av programplaneringen fr strukturfonderna, inbegripet mlet territoriellt samarbete inom EU. e) Kommissionen kommer att ta fram riktlinjer och metodbeskrivningar i god tid fre nsta programperiod. g) Kommissionen har meddelat att programkomplementen kommer att utg i nsta programperiod. h) Kommissionen kommer att ta hnsyn till revisionsrttens rekommendationer i samband med frberedelserna av nsta programperiod. i) Kommissionen kommer att frelgga rdet ett frslag till frordning p omrdet.
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 5/2004 concerning Phare support to prepare Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, of the EC Treaty) (2005/C 15/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ 
20.1.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 15/1 I (Meddelanden) REVISIONSRTTEN SRSKILD RAPPORT nr 5/2004 om Phare-std fr att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna (i enlighet med artikel 248.4 andra stycket i EG-frdraget) (2005/C 15/01) INNEHLLSF RTECKNING SAMMANFATTNING ........................................................
PHAREPROCEDURES ....................................................... 
INLEDNING ...............................................................
Multiannualprogrammingnotintroduced .................................... 
F RFARANDENF RPHARE .................................................
FUNDING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PHARE PROGRAMMES TO PREPARE CANDIDATE COUNTRIESFORMANAGINGTHESTRUCTURALFUNDS .......................... 
Frseningar i upprttandet av systemet fr utvidgat decentraliserat genomfrande Flerrigprogramplaneringharinteinfrts ....................................
Allocationoffundingtomostcountrieswaslessthanforeseen.................... 
Tilldelningen av anslag till de flesta lnder var lgre n vad som frutsetts . . . . . . . . . . .
RESULTS OF INSTITUTION-BUILDING PROJECTS TO PREPARE CANDIDATE COUNTRIES FORMANAGINGTHESTRUCTURALFUNDS .................................... 
Svrigheter med att frbereda program som liknar strukturfondernas ml 1-program Frseningariprogramgenomfrandet .......................................
CONCLUSIONS ............................................................ 
SLUTSATSER ..............................................................
Difficulties in the overall approach of using the Phare programme to prepare Candidate CountriesformanagingtheStructuralFunds .................................. Paragraph I-VII 1-14 1-10 11-14 15-28 15-17 18-26 27-28 29-36 30-33 34-36 37-55 37-41 42-45 46-55 56-62 63-67 63 Page 4 5 5 7 8 8 9 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 14 17 18 18 
Svrigheter med den vergripande strategin att anvnda Phare-programmet fr att frbe-redakandidatlndernafrfrvaltningenavstrukturfonderna...................... Punkt IĐVII 1Đ14 1Đ10 11Đ14 15Đ28 15Đ17 18Đ26 27Đ28 29Đ36 30Đ33 34Đ36 37Đ55 37Đ41 42Đ45 46Đ55 56Đ62 63Đ67 63 Sida 4 5 5 7 8 8 9 11 11 11 12 12 12 13 14 17 18 18
C 15/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.1.2005 Paragraph Page 64 18 65 18 66 18 Overallconclusion ...................................................... 
66 18 Allmnslutsats .........................................................
RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... 
67 18 REKOMMENDATIONER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 
68Đ71 18 Kommissionens svar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... 20
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/3 CBC CSF EAGGF EDIS ERDF ESC ESF ISPA NDP Phare PNDP PPF Sapard SPD SPP LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Cross Border Cooperation Community Support Framework European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund Extended Decentralised Implementation System European Regional Development Fund Economic and Social Cohesion European Social Fund Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession National Development Plan The main pre-accession instrument Preliminary National Development Plan Project Preparation Facility The pre-accession instrument for measures for agriculture and rural development Single Programming Document Special Preparatory Programme 
20.1.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 15/3 ERUF ESF EUGFJ Ispa Phare Sapard F RTECKNING VER F RKORTNINGAR Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden Europeiska socialfonden Europeiska utvecklings-och garantifonden fr jordbruket Strukturpolitiskt franslutningsinstrument Det frmsta franslutningsinstrumentet Franslutningsinstrument fr tgrder fr jordbruks-och landsbygdsutveckling
C 15/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. The audit examined the effectiveness of the Phare programme, the first of the three pre-accession instruments to be established by the Commission, in helping to prepare Candidate Countries for managing the two main Structural Funds, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Social Fund (ESF). 
C 15/4 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning SAMMANFATTNING I. Vid granskningen undersktes om Phare-programmet (det frsta av de tre franslutningsinstrument som kommissionen inrttade) r ndamlsenligt nr det gller att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av de tv frmsta strukturfonderna, Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden (ERUF) och Europeiska socialfonden (ESF).
The audit covered the period from 1998, the year from which Phare was reoriented to focus on accession, to 2002 and focused on the 1998 Special Preparatory Programme (SPP) and the Economic and Social Cohesion (ESC) programmes, which were first launched in 2000. 
Granskningen omfattade perioden frn 1998, det r d Phare brjade inriktas p anslutningen, till 2002, och inriktades p 1998 rs srskilda frberedande program och program fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning som infrdes frst 2000.
The objective of helping to prepare Candidate Countries for the Structural Funds was given an increasingly high priority by the Commission because it wished to ensure that the countries concerned would be able to benefit fully from the very large allocations available to them following accession. 
Mlet att hjlpa kandidatlnderna att frbereda sig fr strukturfonderna gavs kad prioritet av kommissionen eftersom den ville se till att de berrda lnderna till fullo skulle kunna dra nytta av de mycket hga anslag som blir tillgngliga fr dem efter anslutningen.
The overall approach of using the Phare programme to prepare Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds II. 
Den vergripande strategin att anvnda Phare-programmet fr att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna II.
The fact that a new instrument was not established to help prepare Candidate Countries for the ERDF and ESF made it more difficult to familiarise the Candidate Countries with Structural Funds procedures (see paragraphs 16 and 17). 
Genom att det inte inrttades ngot nytt instrument fr att hjlpa kandidatlnderna med frberedelserna fr ERUF och ESF blev det svrare att gra dessa lnder frtrogna med strukturfondsfrfaranden (se punkterna 16 och 17).
Moreover, the initial approach which the Commission required Candidate Countries to follow in setting up ESC programmes differed from the approach of the Structural Funds (see paragraphs 18 to 24). Not all of the regions eligible for the Structural Funds gained experience in managing ESC programmes prior to accession while the Phare implementation structures did not reflect those of the Structural Funds. The effectiveness of the ESC programmes further suffered from the fact that they also aimed to achieve a cohesion impact and this was not always compatible with the objective of preparing for the Structural Funds (see paragraph 27). 
Det ursprungliga frfarande som kommissionen krvde att kandidatlnderna skulle anvnda nr de inrttade program fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning skilde sig dessutom frn struk-turfondsfrfarandena (se punkterna 18Đ24). Inte alla de regioner som r berttigade till strukturfondsstd har ftt erfarenhet av frvaltning av program fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning fre anslutningen eftersom genomfrandestrukturerna fr Phare inte motsvarade genomfrandestrukturerna fr strukturfonderna. ndamlsenligheten i programmen fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning frsmrades ytterligare av att programmen ven syftade till att n en sammanhllningseffekt, vilket inte alltid var frenligt med mlet att frbereda fr strukturfonderna (se punkt 27).
Phare procedures III. 
Frfaranden fr Phare III.
While the Commission had intended that Candidate Countries should learn to manage these programmes on the basis of the Commission only exercising ex-post controls, as would be the case for the management of the Structural Funds, in the end the Extended Decentralised Implementation System (EDIS), which was to make this possible, was not introduced before the accession (see paragraphs 30 to 32). 
Kommissionens avsikt var att kandidatlnderna skulle lra sig att frvalta dessa program och att kommissionen endast skulle gra efterhandskontroller, ssom vid frvaltningen av strukturfonderna, men systemet fr utvidgat decentraliserat genomfrande, som skulle gra detta mjligt, infrdes inte fre anslutningen (se punkterna 30Đ32).
The delays encountered in introducing a system of ex post control also made it more difficult to use grant schemes, the main mechanism for implementing the Structural Funds (see paragraph 33). 
De frseningar som uppstod vid infrandet av ett system med efterhandskontroller gjorde det ocks svrare att anvnda bidragssystem, den viktigaste mekanismen fr genomfrandet av strukturfonderna (se punkt 33).
Very little progress was made in introducing a further procedure employed under the Structural Funds, multiannual programming (see paragraphs 34 and 35). 
Mycket liten framgng nddes med infrandet av ytterligare ett frfarande som till-lmpas inom strukturfonderna, nmligen flerrig programplanering (se punkterna 34 och 35).
Allocations for and implementation of programmes to prepare for the Structural Funds IV. Although overall approximately 35 % of the Phare programme was allocated to ESC programmes, most countries allocated somewhat less than this target figure, mainly due to insufficient absorption capacity and competing priorities (see paragraphs 39 to 41). 
Tilldelning fr och genomfrande av program som skall frbereda fr strukturfonderna IV. ven om totalt sett omkring 35 % av Phare-programmet avsattes till program fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning avsatte de flesta lnder ngot mindre n detta riktmrke, frmst p grund av de inte hade tillrcklig frmga att utnyttja stdet och p grund av konkurrerande prioriteringar (se punkterna 39Đ41).
Thus countries struggled to design programmes and did not devote sufficient funding to preparing future ESC and Structural Fund projects (see paragraphs 43 to 45). 
Lnderna kmpade allts med att utforma program och gnade inte tillrckliga medel till att frbereda framtida projekt fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning och strukturfondsprojekt (se punkterna 43Đ45).
They also experienced considerable difficulties in contracting funds before the deadlines (see paragraphs 46 to 52). 
De hade ocks stora svrigheter med att ing taganden inom tidsramarna (se punkterna 46Đ52).
These problems in absorption capacity largely reflected the inexperience and insufficient institutional development of the ministries responsible for managing the ESC programmes (see paragraphs 54 and 55). 20.1.2005 
Dessa svrigheter att utnyttja stdet var framfr allt en fljd av att de ministerier som skulle ha ansvar fr frvaltningen av programmen fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning var oerfarna och inte tillrckligt utvecklade som institutioner (se punkterna 54 och 55). 20.1.2005
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union Results of institution-building projects to prepare Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds V. This insufficient institutional development, as well as uncertainty over which bodies would be designated to be future managing and paying authorities, reduced the impact of institution-building projects (see paragraphs 58 and 59). 
20.1.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning Resultat av institutionsuppbyggnadsprojekt fr att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna V. Eftersom institutionerna inte var tillrckligt utvecklade och det var oskert vilka organ som skulle utses till framtida frvaltningsmyndigheter och utbetalande myndigheter minskade effekten av institutionsuppbyggnadsprojekten (se punkterna 58 och 59).