natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It also plays an active part in the work of the various monitoring groups.1 The current discussion within the Commission on the promotion of agricultural products will doubtlessly provide a further contribution. 
Dessutom deltar kommissionen aktivt i olika vervaknings-grupper1. Det rder inga tvivel om att den diskussion som frs inom kommissionen om sljfrmjande tgrder fr jordbruksprodukter i slutnden kommer att bidra i detta avseende.
1 These groups are provided for by Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 3/2008. 
1 Dessa vervakningsgrupper freskrivs i artikel 12.1 i frordning (EG) nr 3/2008.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION VII. 
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR VII.
The promotion programmes have had and continue to have a tangible impact on the promotion of European agricultural products, as shown by the eight evaluation studies requested by the Commission. 
Programmen fr sljfrmjande tgrder har effektivt pverkat marknadsfringen av EU:s jordbruksprodukter, vilket framgr av de tta utvrderingar som kommissionen har bestllt.
A lack of selectivity and control by the Member States at the preselection stage results in ineffective programmes being presented to the Commission. 
Bristande selektivitet och kontroll vid medlemsstaternas frhandsurval leder till att program som inte r srskilt effektiva lggs fram infr kommissionen.
However, the Commission departments’ rigorous approach in applying the regulation2 makes it very unlikely that this type of programme would be selected. 
Men i och med att kommissionens tjnsteavdelningar tillmpar frordningen2 strikt, begrnsas risken fr att denna typ av program ska vljas av kommissionen kraftigt.
The Commission would ask the Member States to increase the standards of evaluation and selection for programme proposals. 
Kommissionen uppmuntrar medlemsstaterna att bli mer noggranna nr de utvrderar och vljer ut programfrslag.
To ensure that improvements continue, particularly as regards requirements concerning information on the expected impact of the programme and the way in which it will be measured, the Commission has produced the following three documents: — guidelines to be considered when assessing and managing part-financing programmes for promoting Community agricultural products (AGRI/60787/2007); — the document on evaluation matters (AGRI/63454/2007); — a standard evaluation grid, allowing the Commission to objectively assess and quantify the evaluation of the programmes (AGRI/64046/2008). 
Fr att f till stnd frbttringar, srskilt i frga om kraven p information om programmets frvntade effekt och hur detta ska mtas har kommissionens tjnsteavdelningar utarbetat fljande tre dokument: Đ Riktlinjer som ska beaktas vid bedmning av samfinansierade program fr sljfrmjande tgrder fr gemenskapens jordbruksprodukter (dok. AGRI/60787/2007). Đ Ett dokument om utvrderingsfrgor (dok.
2 Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 501/2008. 
2 Artikel 11.2 i frordning (EG) nr 501/2008.
With regard to the recurring weaknesses in Spain and Italy, following the investigations by the Commission in 2004 and 2005 which led to substantial financial corrections, the Commission launched follow-up investigations in 2007 and 2008. 
Nr det gller de terkommande bristerna i Spanien och Italien ledde kommissionens underskningar 2004 och 2005 till stora ekonomiska korrigeringar och drefter har kommissionen gjort uppfljningsunderskningar 2007 och 2008.
A third on-the-spot investigation is planned in Italy in 2009. 
En tredje underskning p plats planeras fr Italien 2009.
The Commission has carried out audits in Spain and Italy for all in respect of the financial years covered by the measure since 2003 and in respect of these countries’ decentralised management up to now. The corrective measures adopted by these Member States have also been examined in the framework of clearance of accounts investigations. 
Kommissionen har granskat samtliga rkenskapsr fr tgrden sedan 2003 tillsammans med den decentraliserade frvaltningen fram till i dag fr dessa bda medlemsstater. De korrigerande tgrder som de har vidtagit analyseras ocks inom ramen fr underskningarna i samband med att rkenskaperna avslutas.
The Court’s observations will also be taken into account during the clearance of accounts. 
Revisionsrttens synpunkter kommer att beaktas nr rkenskaperna avslutas.
X. Checks on the selection of implementing bodies have been particularly stepped up for those selected after adoption of the Commission’s decision on the programmes accepted. 
X. Kontrollen av urvalet av verkstllande organ har frstrkts, srskilt fr dem som har valts efter det att kommissionens beslut om godknda program antagits.
The manual of procedures for monitoring programmes now provides for tighter checks on the documentation submitted by Member States concerning national selection procedures (points 1.4 and 2). 
I handboken fr vervakning av programmen freskrivs i punkterna 1.4 och 2 en utkad kontroll av den dokumentation som medlemsstaterna ska versnda i frga om de nationella urvalsfrfarandena.
Once the internal discussion on the strategy for the EU co-financed promotion policy has been completed, the Commission will apply the operational guidelines based on its conclusions. 
S snart den interna diskussionen om strategin fr den del av politiken fr sljfrmjande tgrder som samfinansieras av EU r avslutad kommer kommissionens tjnsteavdelningar att brja tillmpa de riktlinjer som denna diskussion utmynnar i.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION OBSERVATIONS 16. 
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR IAKTTAGELSER 16.
Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 lays down the objective of developing an overall, coherent information and promotion policy. 
Genom rdets frordning (EG) nr 3/2008 utvecklas en vergripande och sammanhllen politik fr information om och frmjande av jordbruksprodukter.
Similarly, Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 501/2008 also lays down appropriate specific objectives for the internal market for each of the various products concerned. 
P samma stt utvecklas i bilaga I till kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 501/2009 specifika och ndamlsenliga ml fr var och en av de berrda produkterna p den inre marknaden.
Document AGRI/63454/2007 was adopted and distributed on 2 October 2007 to the Member States to evaluate the results which all future programmes should achieve. 
Dokumentet AGRI/63454/2007 antogs och skickades ut till medlemsstaterna den 2 oktober 2007 fr att utvrdera de resultat som br uppns inom samtliga program i framtiden.
The promotion and information programmes are co-financed by the proposing organisations, the Member States and the EU. 
Programmen fr sljfrmjande tgrder och information samfinansieras av de frslagsstllande organisationerna, medlemsstaterna och EU.
This system of co-financing is an effective method of making the stakeholders accountable and of beneficially applying the principle of subsidiarity to this policy. 
Detta samfinansieringssystem innebr att man p ett effektivt stt kan frdela ansvaret p de olika berrda aktrerna och anvnda subsidiaritetsprincipen p ett fruktbart stt fr denna politik.
General reply to Box 2 The proposed comparison should take account of the fact that the objectives and mechanisms of the above promotion programmes are not comparable to those of Community promotion policy. 
Svar p textruta 2 i sin helhet. Den freslagna jmfrelsen mste ta hnsyn till att mlen och mekanismerna fr programmen fr sljfrmjande tgrder inte gr att jmfra med mlen och mekanismerna fr gemenskapens politik fr sljfrmjande tgrder.
3 Coherence between the implemented measures and the objectives of the regulation; actions and information channels used and their cost-effectiveness; coverage and content of the programmes; impact and effectiveness of the measures; and complementarities between programmes submitted by the Member States and programmes submitted by the professional organisations. 
3 Samstmmighet mellan de tgrder som vidtagits och frordningens ml, insatser och informationskanaler som utnyttjas samt deras lnsamhet, programmens omfattning och innehll, insatsernas inverkan och effektivitet samt hur medlemsstaternas program och de program som lggs fram av branschorganisationer kompletterar varandra.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 20. 
KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 20.
Since the beginning of this promotion and information policy (1999), several professional organisations representing products and sectors have noted a definite impact of their action on achieving objectives. 
Sedan denna politik fr sljfrmjande tgrder och information inrttades (1999) har en mngd branschorganisationer som fretrder produkter och sektorer mrkt att vissa av deras tgrder har haft effekt i frga om mlen.
This can be verified in the eight evaluation studies requested by the Commission. 
Detta bekrftas i de tta utvrderingar som kommissionen bestllt.
The Commission is aware of the deficiencies pointed out by the Court and mentioned in the evaluation studies. 
Kommissionens tjnsteavdelningar r medvetna om de brister som revisionsrtten ppekar och som tagits upp i utvrderingarna.
Discussions are ongoing within the Commission to improve the definition and implementation of the programmes with regard to the synergy and complementarity of promotion campaigns and to address other problems raised by the external evaluators. 
Det pgr interna diskussioner inom kommissionen fr att frbttra utformningen och genomfrandet av programmen i frga om synergieffekter och komplementaritet mellan sljfrmjande tgrder, och ven i frga om andra problem som tagits upp i de externa utvrderingarna.
The promotion and information programmes are co-financed by the proposing organisations, the Member States and the European Union. 
Programmen fr sljfrmjande tgrder och information samfinansieras av de frslagsstllande organisationerna, medlemsstaterna och EU.
Under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 501/2008, it is the responsibility of Member States to ensure consistency with other programmes and initiatives as part of their duty to see that the selected programmes are satisfactorily implemented. 
I enlighet med artikel 9 i frordning (EG) nr 501/2008 r det medlemsstaterna som ska se till att tgrderna r frenliga med andra program och initiativ inom ramen fr deras ansvar fr att utfra de godknda programmen korrekt.
Reply to Box 4 First and second indents Article 8 of Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 provides that the Commission must give priority to programmes proposed by several Member States and that the Commission will continue to encourage representative professional organisations to submit ‘multi-country’ programmes and synergy generators. 
Svar p textruta 4 Frsta och andra strecksatsen I artikel 8 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 3/2008 anges att program som fresls av flera medlemsstater ska prioriteras. Kommissionen kommer att fortstta att uppmuntra de representativa branschorganisationerna att lgga fram program som omfattar flera lnder och som skapar synergieffekter.
Special Report No 10/2009 — Information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products 37 Third indent A working party was specifically set up at the meeting of the advisory group on promotion on 12 January 2009 to achieve more synergy between programmes. 
Srskild rapport nr 10/2009 Đ Informationskampanjer och sljfrmjande tgrder fr jordbruksprodukter 37 Tredje strecksatsen Det var fr att skapa strre synergieffekter mellan programmen som frgan om en arbetsgrupp vcktes vid ett mte med den rdgivande gruppen fr sljfrmjande tgrder den 12 januari 2009.
This working party could consist of representative professional organisations at European level and of representatives of the Member States. 
Denna arbetsgrupp skulle kunna best av de representativa organisationerna p EU-niv och av fretrdare fr medlemsstaterna.
The vast majority of the programmes taken as examples by the Court of Auditors are programmes selected by Member States before 2005. 
Den stora majoriteten av de program som revisionsrtten tar upp som exempel r sdana som valdes ut av medlemsstaterna fre 2005.
The new provisions set out in this manual pay particular attention to analysing the responses received from Member States concerning promotion material for products, quarterly and annual reports, annual and final evaluations, contracts, ‘template actions’, intermediate and final payments and webpages. 
De nya bestmmelserna i handboken lgger srskilt stor vikt vid analysen av de svar som medlemsstaterna tar emot i frga om sljfrmjande material om produkter, kvartals- och rsrapporter, rliga och slutliga utvrderingar, avtal, ÓtgrdsmallenÓ, del-och slutbetalningar samt webbplatser.
4 After documents AGRI/60787/2007 and AGRI/63454/2007 were drawn up. 
4 Efter utarbetandet av dokument AGRI/60787/2007 och AGRI/63454/2007.
These problems were detected after analysis of the first external evaluations studies requested by the Commission. 
Dessa problem upptcktes vid analysen av de frsta externa utvrderingar som kommissionen bestllt.
To resolve them, the Commission issued all the Member States with a series of indicators on 2 October 2007 to assess all future promotion programmes5. (a) The impact of the action taken can be gauged from the programmes approved from December 2008. 
Fr att lsa dem skickade kommissionen den 2 oktober 2007 ut en rad indikatorer till medlemsstaterna fr att i framtiden utvrdera alla program fr sljfrmjande tgrder5. a) tgrdernas effekter kommer att kunna analyseras fr program som godknts frn och med december 2008.
Most of the programmes taken as examples by the Court of Auditors are programmes selected before 2005. 
Majoriteten av de program som revisionsrtten tar upp som exempel r sdana som valdes ut av medlemsstaterna fre 2005.
These programmes have not therefore been subject to the various improvements which were made to the current rules.6 (b) See reply to point 26. (c) The comments made by the Court of Auditors were already taken into account by the Commission on 2 October 2007. 
Dessa program omfattades allts inte av de olika frbttringar som infrts genom tillmpningsbestmmelserna6. b) Se svaret i punkt 26. c) De anmrkningar som revisionsrtten tar upp hade redan beaktats av kommissionens tjnsteavdelningar den 2 oktober 2007.
The new provisions in the manual of procedures cover this aspect and greater attention will be paid from now on to the analysis of information received from the Member States. 
De nya bestmmelserna i handboken innebr att analysen av den information som medlemsstaterna tar emot ska uppmrksammas srskilt.
6 Documents AGRI/60787/2007 and AGRI/63454/2007. 
6 Dokument AGRI/60787/2007 och AGRI/63454/2007.
Special Report No 10/2009 — Information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products 38 General reply to Box 5 Most of the programmes taken as examples by the Court of Auditors are programmes selected before 2005. 
Srskild rapport nr 10/2009 Đ Informationskampanjer och sljfrmjande tgrder fr jordbruksprodukter 38 Svar p textruta 5 i sin helhet Majoriteten av de program som revisionsrtten tar upp som exempel r sdana som valdes ut av medlemsstaterna fre 2005.
Example of an indicator not directly corresponding to the aims set by the programme The new provisions in the Commission’s manual of procedures stipulate that greater attention must be paid from now on to the analysis of information received from the Member States. 
Exempel p en indikator som inte direkt motsvarar programmets ml De nya bestmmelserna i kommissionens handbok innebr att analysen av den information som tas emot frn medlemsstaterna ska uppmrksammas srskilt.
Example of indicators announced by the programmes but not followed up The new provisions in the manual of procedures stipulate that greater attention must be paid from now on to the analysis of information received from the Member States. 
Exempel p indikator som angavs i programmen men som inte alls fljdes upp De nya bestmmelserna i kommissionens handbok innebr att analysen av den information som tas emot frn medlemsstaterna ska uppmrksammas srskilt.
7 Documents AGRI/60787/2007 and AGRI/63454/2007. 
7 Dokument AGRI/60787/2007 och AGRI/63454/2007.
8 This is why, when the Promotion of Agricultural Products Committee met on 2 October 2007, document AGRI/63454/2007 was distributed to all the Member States to help them to select programmes more efficiently and evaluate the effectiveness of the programmes they manage, check and co-finance. 
8 Detta var anledningen till att dokument AGRI/63454/2007 delades ut till alla medlemsstater vid mtet med frvaltningskommittn fr frmjande av jordbruksprodukter den 2 oktober 2007, fr att hjlpa dem att frbttra urvalet och utvrderingen av de program som de har frvaltat, kontrollerat och medfinansierat.
In this regard, please see also point 17 above. REPLY OF THE COMMISSION 28.–29. 
Se punkt 17 i det dokumentet. KOMMISSIONENS SVAR 28Đ29.
The importance and the positive impact of this policy can be easily illustrated using passages from the above evaluations, for example: ’EU co-funding enables proposing organisations to conduct ambitious, large-scale programmes addressing a wide audience with expected high impact [...]. 
Denna politiks betydelse och positiva inverkan kan enkelt illustreras med andra delar i samma kapitel i ovannmnda utvrderingar, t.ex.: ÓGenom EU:s samfinansiering kan de frslagsstllande organisationerna genomfra ambitisa program i stor skala som riktar sig till en stor publik, samtidigt som det freskrivs att programmen ska f stora effekter (...).
Without EU co-funding, some campaigns would not have been implemented’, and ‘EU co-funding produces multiplier effects, mainly by facilitating implementation of other campaigns and [...] by promoting cooperation between Member States at EU level’.9 Another passage states that: ‘As a consequence of these campaigns, the image (of the promoted products) has improved among opinion leaders and the general public has been made familiar with a wider range of products than before’ and ‘EU co-financing has been a clear incentive for professionals to join forces and for improving sector integration [...]. In particular, small producers felt encouraged to organise their own promotion campaigns outside their region of production.’10 Moreover, ‘[...] They also state that, without co-financing, the programmes either would not have taken place or would have been much smaller.’11 9 Fruit and vegetables sector, November 2007. 
Utan samfinansieringen frn EU skulle vissa kampanjer inte ha genomfrtsÓ och ÓEU:s samfinansiering ger spridningseffekter, framfr allt genom att underltta genomfrandet eller andra kampanjer samt (...) genom att frmja samarbetet mellan medlemsstaterna p EU-nivÓ.9 P ett annat stlle anges fljande: ÓDessa kampanjer har lett till en frbttrad bild av (de marknadsfrda produkterna) hos opinionsbildare och till att den stora allmnheten har en bttre knnedom om ett strre produktutbud n tidigare.Ó ÓSamfinansieringen frn EU har tydligt stimulerat branschen att gruppera sig och har kat integrationen inom sektorn (...).Framfr allt har sm producenter knt sig manade att sjlva anordna sljfrmjande kampanjer utanfr sitt produktionsomrde.Ó10 De frklarar ocks Ó(...) att utan samfinansiering hade programmen inte genomfrts, eller hade tminstone varit betydligt mindreÓ.11 9 Frukt-och grnsakssektorn, november 2007.
10 Wine sector, April 2007. 
10 Vinsektorn, april 2007.
11 Organic products sector, November 2006. 
11 Sektorn fr ekologiska produkter, november 2006.
39 Moreover, even before the start of the Court of Auditors’ audit (on 4 April 2008) and before the end of the cycle of the external evaluation studies requested by the Commission (in December 2008), the Commission had already drawn up document AGRI/63454/2007 on matters relating to evaluation on the basis of the conclusions and recommendations contained in the evaluation studies available. 
39 Kommissionens tjnsteavdelningar hade dessutom utarbetat dokument AGRI/63454/2007 om utvrderingsfrgor redan innan revisionsrtten inledde sin granskning (4 april 2008) och fre slutfrandet av de externa utvrderingar som kommissionen bestllt (december 2008), p grundval av slutsatserna och rekommendationerna i de utvrderingar som fanns att tillg.
Reply to Box 6 — With regard to fruit and vegetables, the detailed guidelines in Regulation (EC) No 501/200812 show that the aims of the Community information and promotion policy are much broader and more complex, and certainly go beyond simply quantifying consumption. 
Svar p textruta 6 Đ Nr det gller frukt och grnsaker framgr det av riktlinjerna i frordning (EG) nr 501/200812 att mlen fr gemenskapens politik fr information och sljfrmjande tgrder r mycket mer omfattande och komplexa och handlar om mycket mer n att kvantifiera konsumtionen.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION — The Commission proposed remedies to the criticism issued by the external evaluation firms as and when it received their reports. The Commission focused in particular on the methods used to evaluate the cost– impact ratio based on the evaluation of the internal market programmes13. 
Kommissionens tjnsteavdelningar har srskilt uppmrksammat frgan om de metoder som anvnds fr att utvrdera rapporten om frhllandet mellan kostnader och resultat med utgngspunkt i utvrderingen av programmen fr den inre marknaden13. vervakningssystemet har frstrkts betydligt och nr kommissionen tar emot rsrapporterna frn varje program uppmrksammar den srskilt medlemsstaternas utvrdering av tgrderna.
30. It will be possible to gauge the impact of the measures on the programmes approved as of December 2008. 
30. tgrdernas effekter kommer att kunna mtas fr program som godknts frn och med december 2008.
See reply to point 26(a). 
Se svaret i punkt 26 a.
Because of the Member States’ lack of selectivity and control during the preselection process, a number of ineffective programmes are presented to the Commission. 
Bristande selektivitet och kontroll vid medlemsstaternas frhandsurval leder till att program som inte r srskilt effektiva lggs fram infr kommissionen.
Nevertheless, the Commission’s rigorous application of the regulation14 considerably limits the risk of this type of programme being selected by the Commission. 
Men i och med att kommissionens tjnsteavdelningar tillmpar frordningen14 strikt, begrnsas risken fr att denna typ av program ska vljas av kommissionen kraftigt.
13 Dated 15 February 2009. 
13 Av den 15 februari 2009.
14 Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 501/2008. 
14 Artikel 11.2 i frordning (EG) nr 501/2008.
Special Report No 10/2009 — Information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products 40 The Commission is making an effort to get Member States to raise their standards in terms of evaluation and selection of programme proposals. 
Srskild rapport nr 10/2009 Đ Informationskampanjer och sljfrmjande tgrder fr jordbruksprodukter 40 Kommissionen arbetar fr att medlemsstaterna ska bli mer noggranna nr de utvrderar och vljer ut programfrslag.
The Court refers to document AGRI/63454/2007 of 2 October 2007. 
Revisionsrtten hnvisar till dokument AGRI/63454/2007 av den 2 oktober 2007.
Since then, programmes have been evaluated on the basis of the criteria set out in this document, among other things. 
Utvrderingen av programmen har sedan dess bl.a. byggts p kriterierna i det dokumentet.