natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(3) Freelance interpreters are also known under the French acronym AIC (Auxiliaire Interprte de Confrence). 
(3) FrilanstolkarrockskndaunderdenfranskaakronymenAIC(ÓAuxi-liaire Interprte de ConfrenceÓ).
(4) The Staff Regulations of officials of the European Communities and the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities are laid down in Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 
(4) Tjnstefreskrifterna fr tjnstemnnen i Europeiska gemenskaperna och anstllningsvillkoren fr vriga anstllda i Europeiska gemenskaperna faststlls i rdets frordning (EEG, Euratom, EKSG) nr 259/68 (EGT L 56, 4.3.1968, s.
1), last amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 (OJ L 124, 27.4.2004, p. 
1), senast ndrad genom frordning (EG, Euratom) nr 723/2004 (EUT L 124, 27.4.2004, s.
1). (5) For statistical purposes, the DG Interpretation defines an interpreter day as two half-days during which an interpreter really did at least some interpretation (i.e. excluding travelling and all other activities). 
1). (5) I statistiskt syfte definierar GD Tolkning en tolkdag som tv halvdagar under vilka en tolk utfrde tminstone ngon tolkning (det vill sga resor och all vrig verksamhet undantagna).
Because the DG Interpretation, the Parliament and the Court of Justice use different methods to calculate the number of interpreter days provided, the auditors have adjusted the figures for the other institutions to make them comparable with the DG InterpretationŐs figures in order to calculate the share of each institution in the total consumption and to calculate the cost per interpretation day. 
Eftersom GD Tolkning, parlamentet och domstolen anvnder olika metoder fr att berkna det antal tolkdagar som tillhandahlls, har revisorerna justerat uppgifterna fr de vriga institutionerna i syfte att gra dem jmfrbara med GD Tolknings uppgifter, s att varje institutions andel av den totala frbrukningen och kostnaden per tolkdag kan berknas.
23.11.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 291/5 Table 1 The volume of interpreter/days provided to EU institutions (index 1998 = 100) (1), including the languages of the new Member States Council Commission Other DG Interpretation Total DG Interpretation Parliament 1998 1999 2000 100 96,8 96,3 100 101,5 100,4 100 95,2 102,7 100 98,5 98,5 100 85,0 92,7 100 93,8 96,5 2001 2002 2003 105,6 109,1 103,9 94,7 85,8 85,1 112,3 91,0 88,8 101,8 98,2 95,0 97,8 97,7 97,2 100,4 98,0 95,8 2004 89,9 85,1 95,8 88,9 103,1 93,9 Total (1) To facilitate comparison, 1998 was chosen as the base year because 1998 and 2003 are both years preceding a year of Parliamentary elections and a renewal of the Commission. 
23.11.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 291/5 Tabell 1 Antal tolkdagar som tillhandahllits EU-institutionerna (index 1998 = 100) (1), inbegripet de nya medlemsstaternas sprk 1998 1999 2000 100 96,8 96,3 100 101,5 100,4 100 95,2 102,7 100 98,5 98,5 100 85,0 92,7 100 93,8 96,5 2001 2002 105,6 109,1 94,7 85,8 112,3 91,0 101,8 98,2 97,8 97,7 100,4 98,0 2004 89,9 85,1 85,1 88,8 95,8 95,0 88,9 97,2 103,1 95,8 93,9 Rdet Kommissionen vriga GD Tolkning Totalt GD Tolkning Parlamentet Totalt 2003 103,9 (1) Fr att underltta en jmfrelse valdes 1998 som basr, eftersom 1998 och 2003 bda var r som fregick ett r d val till Europaparlamentet hlls och d en ny kommission utsgs.
Moreover, both years had the same number of official languages (11), as the penultimate EU enlargement took place in 1995. 
Under bda ren var dessutom antalet officiella sprk detsamma (11), eftersom den nst senaste utvidgningen av EU gde rum 1995.
Table 1 shows that in recent years the EU institutions managed to reduce the use of the interpretation services provided to them. 
Tabell 1 visar att EU-institutionerna de senaste ren har lyckats minska utnyttjandet av tolktjnster.
The Council was the only one of the three largest institutions where the number of interpretation days increased between 1998 and 2003, but the new Ôon requestŐ system introduced as from 1 May 2004 appears to have reversed that trend (see paragraph 27). However, 2004 was a transitional year and may therefore not be representative. 
Rdet var den enda av de tre strsta institutionerna dr antalet tolkdagar kade mellan 1998 och 2003, men genom det nya system med tolkning Óp begranÓ som infrdes den 1 maj 2004 frefaller den trenden ha vnt (se punkt 27). r 2004 var dock ett vergngsr och r drfr inte med skerhet representativt.
The evolution in the use of interpretation services at the Council between 1998 and 2003 is explained not only by the increasing number of meetings, but also by the increasing number of active and passive languages (1) used for meetings at that institution. 
Frndringarna i utnyttjandet av tolktjnster vid rdet mellan 1998 och 2003 frklaras inte bara av det kande antalet mten utan ocks av det kande antal aktiva och passiva sprk (1) som anvndes vid mten i rdet.
Article 6 of Regulation No 1 states that Ôthe institutions of the Community may stipulate in their rules of procedure which of the languages are to be used in specific casesŐ. This provision makes it possible to tailor language arrangements to the specific needs of each institution. 
I artikel 6 i frordning nr 1 faststlls fljande: ÓGemenskapens institutioner fr i sina arbetsordningar freskriva nrmare villkor fr hur denna reglering av sprkanvndningen skall tillm-pas.Ó Genom denna bestmmelse kan sprkanvndningen anpassas till varje institutions specifika behov.
The institutions have made use of this possibility to differing degrees, as shown in Annex I. THE AUDIT OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE 13. 
Institutionerna har utnyttjat denna mjlighet i varierande grad, ssom framgr av bilaga I. GRANSKNINGENS SYFTE OCH OMFATTNING 13.
The objective of the CourtŐs audit was to assess the soundness of the financial management of interpretation services at the Parliament, the Commission and the Council. 
Syftet med revisionsrttens granskning var att faststlla om den ekonomiska frvaltningen av tolktjnster vid parlamentet, kommissionen och rdet varit sund.
The audit covered 97 % of the supply of interpretation services (i.e. all supplies, except for the Court of Justice, which has its own (1) Active languages are languages into which interpretation is provided. 
Granskningen omfattade 97 % av de levererade tolktjnsterna (det vill sga alla tolktjnster som tillhandahlls, med undantag av domstolen som har sin egen (1) Aktiva sprk r sprk som det tolkas till.
Passive languages are the languages which can be spoken at the meeting. 
Passiva sprk r de sprk som kan talas vid ett sammantrde.
If the number of active and passive languages is not the same, the meeting has an asymmetric language configuration. 
Om antalet aktiva och passiva sprk inte r detsamma, r sprkregimen vid sammantrdet asymmetrisk.
Example: a 7/6 configuration is a configuration with 7 passive and 6 active languages. interpretation service). 
Ett exempel: sprkregimen 7Đ6 innebr sju passiva och sex aktiva sprk. tolktjnst).
In particular, the audit aimed to establish whether the institutions audited have adequate tools and procedures which ensure that: Ń the interpretation services provided do not exceed the real needs, Ń all the interpretation services needed can be provided, Ń interpretation services are provided at the lowest possible cost, Ń interpretation is of a high quality. 
Granskningen syftade framfr allt till att faststlla om dessa institutioner har lmpliga verktyg och frfaranden fr att se till att Ń de tolktjnster som tillhandahlls inte verstiger de faktiska behoven, Ń alla tolktjnster som behvs kan tillhandahllas, Ń tolktjnster tillhandahlls till lgsta mjliga kostnad, Ń tolkningen hller hg kvalitet.
The audit covered expenditure during the 2003 financial year, but changes occurring in 2004 as a consequence of the most recent enlargement of the European Union have also been taken into consideration. 
Granskningen omfattade utgifter under budgetret 2003, men frndringar som intrffade 2004 efter den senaste utvidgningen av Europeiska unionen har ocks beaktats.
OBSERVATIONS The procedures applied to avoid providing interpretation services which exceed the real needs 15. 
IAKTTAGELSER Frfaranden som tillmpas fr att undvika att det tillhandahlls tolktjnster som verstiger de faktiska behoven 15.
The actual use of languages at meetings shows that on occasions the interpretation services provided exceed the real interpretation needs (certain participants might prefer using, instead of their mother tongue, another more widely known official language; expected participants might be absent, making certain specific interpretation arrangements superfluous). 
Den faktiska anvndningen av sprk vid mten visar att de tolktjnster som tillhandahlls ibland verstiger de faktiska behoven av tolkning (vissa deltagare kanske fredrar att anvnda ett officiellt sprk som har strre utbredning n deras modersml; personer som skulle ha deltagit kanske r frnvarande, vilket gr vissa specifika tolkarrangemang verfldiga).
The Court examined the extent to which the institutions audited have appropriate procedures in place in order to forecast as precisely as possible the expected use of languages and to monitor actual use, so as to dissuade meeting organisers from requesting interpretation services exceeding such forecasts. 
Revisionsrtten underskte i vilken utstrckning de granskade institutionerna har lmpliga frfaranden fr att s exakt som mjligt frutse den frvntade anvndningen av sprk och fr att vervaka den faktiska anvndningen i syfte att frm mtesarrangrerna att inte begra fler tolktjnster n vad som behvs enligt prognoserna.
C 291/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.11.2005 Parliament 16. 
C 291/6 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 23.11.2005 Parlamentet 16.
The rules of procedure (see Annex I), which state that each of its Members has the possibility of speaking in the official language of his/her choice and that interpretation is provided into the other official languages, oblige the Parliament to make large interpretation resources available. 
Enligt arbetsordningen (se bilaga I) skall samtliga ledamter ha rtt att hlla sina anfranden p det officiella sprk de nskar, och tolkning skall tillhandahllas till vriga officiella sprk, vilket tvingar parlamentet att stlla stora tolkresurser till frfogande.
In order to organise and control the provision of interpretation services, the Bureau of the European Parliament adopted in 1999 a ÔCode of Conduct on MultilingualismŐ, updated in 2004. 
Fr att organisera och reglera tillhandahllandet av tolktjnster antog Europaparlamentets presidium 1999 ÓRiktlinjer fr flersprkighetenÓ, som uppdaterades 2004.
The basic principles inspiring this code are that, while respecting the equal rights of the Members, the costs of multilingualism should be kept within acceptable budgetary limits, resources used more effectively and the users of language facilities should be made aware of the necessity for responsible use of language facilities, based on real needs. 
De principer som ligger till grund fr riktlinjerna innebr att samtidigt som ledamternas lika rttigheter respekteras, skall kostnaderna fr flersprkigheten hllas inom rimliga budgetgrnser, resurserna utnyttjas bttre och de som anvnder sprkresurserna bli medvetna om ndvndigheten av att resurserna utnyttjas p ett ansvarsfullt stt, grundat p faktiska behov.
Interpretation may be requested from the ParliamentŐs Directorate for Interpretation only for the categories of meetings listed in the Code of Conduct (ParliamentŐs plenary sessions, ParliamentŐs governing bodies, committees, delegations, etc.). 
Tolkning kan begras vid parlamentets direktorat fr tolkning endast till de kategorier av sammantrden som anges i arbetsordningen (parlamentets plenarsammantrden, sammantrden i parlamentets organ, utskott, delegationer osv.).
Interpretation is not available to Members acting individually or to outside bodies, but exceptions may be authorised by the Bureau. 
Tolkning r inte tillgnglig fr ledamter som agerar enskilt och inte heller fr utomstende organ, men undantag kan beviljas av presidiet.
The Directorate for Interpretation provides the requested interpretation service according to the priorities and within the limits set in the Code of Conduct. 
Direktoratet fr tolkning tillhandahller den begrda tolktjnsten i enlighet med de prioriteringar och inom de grnser som faststlls i riktlinjerna.
The Code of Conduct, as updated in 2004, states that every parliamentary body needing interpretation services (ÔuserŐ in the wording of the Code) should draw up and regularly update an Ôinterpretation language profileŐ based on the languages requested and actually used by its Members. 
I den uppdaterade versionen av riktlinjerna frn 2004 anges att varje parlamentsorgan som behver tolktjnster (ÓanvndareÓ, enligt formuleringen i riktlinjerna) skall upprtta och regelbundet uppdatera en Ósprkprofil fr tolkningÓ i verensstmmelse med de sprk som efterfrgas och faktiskt anvnds av de ledamter som ingr i det berrda organet.
This is a very useful tool for ensuring that requests correspond to real needs. 
Detta r ett mycket anvndbart redskap fr att se till att frfrgningarna motsvarar de faktiska behoven.
However, as no obligation exists for Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to confirm their presence at a meeting in advance, the Ôinterpretation language profileŐ is not sufficient to prevent the provision of unnecessary interpretation, if MEPs for which specific interpretation services had been planned do not actually attend. 
Men eftersom Europaparlamentets ledamter inte r skyldiga att i frvg bekrfta sin nrvaro vid ett sammantrde, r Ósprkprofilen fr tolkningÓ otillrcklig fr att frhindra att det tillhandahlls tolkning som inte behvs, om ledamter som det planerats srskilda tolktjnster fr i praktiken inte deltar i sammantrdet.
According to the Code of Conduct, at the end of each meeting the head of the team of interpreters is required, in agreement with the secretariat of the meeting, to draw up for the Director of Interpretation a list of the interpretation facilities requested but not used. 
Enligt riktlinjerna skall chefen fr tolklaget, i samfrstnd med sammantrdessekretariatet, efter varje sammantrde upprtta en sammanstllning fr direktren fr tolkning ver de tolkresurser som efterfrgats men inte anvnts.
A copy of that list has to be forwarded to the secretariat of the meeting concerned. 
En kopia av sammanstllningen skall versndas till det berrda organets sekretariat.
In practice, this procedure has applied since September 2004 to committee and delegation meetings. 
I praktiken har detta frfarande tillmpats p utskotts-och delegationssammantrden sedan september 2004.
The resources provided in compliance with the Rules of Procedure exceed the real needs if, at a given meeting, not all the supposed official languages are used. 
De resurser som tillhandahlls i verensstmmelse med arbetsordningen verstiger de faktiska behoven, om alla de officiella sprk som man rknat med inte anvnds vid ett givet sammantrde.
The Parliament has never carried out a survey to assess the frequency and the consequences of such cases. 
Parlamentet har aldrig underskt frekomsten och konsekvenserna av sdana fall.
Commission 22. 
Kommissionen 22.
In each Directorate-General (DG) an administrative unit centralises the requests for interpretation support at specific meetings and transfers them electronically to the DG Interpretation, through the DOR (Demande dŐOrganisation de Runion) system. 
Inom varje generaldirektorat samlar en administrativ enhet frfrgningarna om tolkstd vid olika mten och versnder dem elektroniskt till GD Tolkning via DOR-systemet (system fr bestllning av mten, DOR Đ ÓDemande dŐOrganisation de RunionÓ).
Each DG proposes a desired language configuration and ranks the meetings requested for the same day by order of priority. 
Varje generaldirektorat freslr en lmplig sprkregim och rangordnar de mten som begrts samma dag.
At internal weekly ÔarbitrationŐ meetings, the DG Interpretation decides which requests can be met, taking into account the availability of interpreters and meeting rooms. 
P interna ÓskiljedomsmtenÓ varje vecka beslutar GD Tolkning vilka frfrgningar som kan tillmtesgs med hnsyn till tillgngen p tolkar och mteslokaler.
At further coordination meetings, specific language configurations are assigned to each of the meetings scheduled to take place six weeks later. 
Vid ytterligare samordningsmten tilldelas varje mte som enligt planerna skall hllas sex veckor senare en srskild sprkregim.
The number of active and/or passive languages assigned by the DG Interpretation is often lower than the number initially requested and is the result of negotiations between the DG Interpretation and the DG organising the meeting. 
Det antal aktiva och/eller passiva sprk som GD Tolkning tilldelar r ofta lgre n det antal som ursprungligen begrdes och r resultatet av frhandlingar mellan GD Tolkning och det generaldirektorat som anordnar mtet.
In 2004 such reports were drawn up in 82,5 % of the 8 107 meetings with interpretation. 
Under 2004 hlls 8 107 mten med tolkning, av vilka 82,5 % blev freml fr en sdan rapport.
In 17,7 % of the reports the team leaders stated that passive interpretation had been requested and provided in excess of the real needs, for one or more of the following reasons: certain national delegations did not speak their official languages, did not speak at all, or were absent. 
I 17,7 % av rapporterna uppgav cheferna fr tolklagen att passiv tolkning hade begrts och tillhandahllits i en utstrckning som versteg de faktiska behoven av ett eller flera av fljande skl: medlemmarna i vissa nationella delegationer talade inte sitt officiella sprk, talade inte alls eller var inte nrvarande.
Non-use of active interpretation requested and provided was mentioned in 7,2 % of the reports. 
I 7,2 % av rapporterna uppgavs att aktiv tolkning som begrts och tillhandahllits inte hade utnyttjats.
These occurrences result in at least (1) 1 750 interpreter days paid but not used, costing between 1,5 and 2 million euro. 
Dessa frhllanden resulterar i att tminstone (1) 1 750 tolkdagar betalats men inte utnyttjats, vilket kostar mellan 1,5 och 2 miljoner euro.
(1) Based on the prudent hypothesis that the problem affected only one delegation. 
(1) Baserat p den frsiktiga hypotesen att problemet endast drabbade en delegation.
The average cost of an interpreter day is shown in Table 4. 
Den genomsnittliga kostnaden fr en tolkdag visas i tabell 4.
23.11.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 291/7 24. 
23.11.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 291/7 24.
Although the current procedures giving the DG Interpretation the final word in deciding between conflicting requests from different DGs contain the demand, it is difficult for an interpretation service to decide which meetings are more urgent or more important. 
De frfaranden som fr nrvarande tillmpas och som ger GD Tolkning sista ordet i beslut om olika generaldirektorats ofrenliga frfrgningar gr det visserligen mjligt att begrnsa efterfrgan, men det r svrt fr en tolktjnst att avgra vilka mten som r mer brdskande eller viktigare n andra.
Other international institutions have implemented systems that are more resource-management oriented: Ń the Council of Europe has introduced a system of internal billing, Ń Unesco applies a quota system, whereby the interpretation days exceeding the quota are charged back to the meeting requester. 
Andra internationella institutioner har infrt system som r mer inriktade p resursfrvaltning: Ń Europardet har infrt ett system med interndebitering. Ń Unesco tillmpar ett kvotsystem, dr de tolkdagar som verstiger kvoten debiteras den enhet som begrt sammantrdet.
Among the European Union institutions, the Council has adopted the system mentioned in paragraph 27, which increases the cost awareness of national delegations. 
Bland de europeiska institutionerna har rdet infrt det system som tas upp i punkt 27, vilket kar de nationella delegationernas kostnadsmedvetenhet.
Under the new Activity Based Management system similar arrangements could be considered by the DG Interpretation. 
Med det nya systemet fr verksamhetsbaserad frvaltning skulle GD Tolkning kunna vervga liknande arrangemang.
Council Procedures applied before the 2004 enlargement of the European Union 25. 
Rdet Frfaranden som tillmpades fre utvidgningen av Europeiska unionen 2004 25.
The nomenclature used before the enlargement to determine the language configuration provided for each meeting was based on tradition and was not regularly updated. 
Den nomenklatur som anvndes fre utvidgningen fr att faststlla sprkregimen vid varje mte byggde p tradition och uppdaterades inte regelbundet.
There was no procedure to verify whether those attending meetings really needed interpretation into their mother tongue or whether they really expressed themselves in their own language. 
Det fanns inget frfarande fr att kontrollera om mtesdeltagare faktiskt behvde tolkning till sitt modersml eller om de verkligen talade sitt modersml.
An excess of languages on offer was shown by a 2001 survey of 799 Council and Commission delegates (1). 
En underskning 2001 dr 799 delegater (1) frn rdet och kommissionen ingick visade att ett alltfr stort antal sprk erbjds.
Although 73 % of the delegates stated that they had the possibility of expressing themselves in their mother tongue, only 59 % of them said they had actually spoken that language. 
Trots att 73 % av delegaterna hvdade att de hade mjlighet att anvnda sitt modersml, uppgav endast 59 % av dem att de faktiskt hade talat det sprket.
This would often have been the case of delegates who have as their mother tongue a not much diffused language and who are fluent in a more widely known official language. 
Detta skulle ofta ha varit fallet fr delegater som har ett modersml med liten utbredning och som behrskar ett mer utbrett officiellt sprk.
It is improbable that delegates who spoke an official language needed interpretation into their mother tongue from an official language which they used. 
Det r osannolikt att delegater som talade ett officiellt sprk behvde tolkning till sitt modersml frn det officiella sprket i frga.
It is therefore reasonable to consider that the languages for which interpretation is needed are the languages actually spoken at a meeting. 
Drfr r det rimligt att hvda att de sprk som det behvs tolkning till r de sprk som faktiskt talas vid ett mte.
(1) Algo Consultants, Evaluation de la qualit des prestations fournies par le SCIC en matire dŐinterprtation, Lyon-Ecully, 26 June 2001. 
(1) Algo Consultants, Evaluation de la qualit des prestations fournies par le SCIC en matire dŐinterprtation, Lyon-Ecully, 26 juni 2001.
Procedures for the period after the enlargement 27. 
Frfaranden efter utvidgningen 27.
Decision No 56/04 of the Secretary-General of the Council (2) governing the language arrangements for the period after the enlargement has substantially changed the use of interpretation services. 
Beslut nr 56/04 av rdets generalsekreterare (2) om sprkanvndningen efter utvidgningen har vsentligen frndrat anvndningen av tolktjnster.
The new system adapts the language arrangements to the real needs of the delegations, increases their cost awareness and gives Member States an incentive to cut down on unnecessary interpretation requests, with a consequent reduction of interpretation costs. 
Genom det nya systemet anpassas sprkanvndningen till delegationernas faktiska behov, kar delegationernas kostnadsmedvetenhet och fr medlemsstaterna ett incitament att minska antalet ondiga frfrgningar om tolkning, vilket leder till minskade kostnader fr tolkning.