natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The audit identified delays in the implementation of the Regulation (paragraph 33) and widespread incorrect application on the part of national and regional administrations in fundamental details of its implementation (paragraph 78, for example), due, in part, to insufficient guidance from the Commission (paragraphs 22 to 36). 
Vid granskningen konstaterades frseningar i genomfrandet av frordningen (punkt 33) och vanligt frekommande felaktig tillmpning frn nationella och regionala frvaltningars sida vad gller grundlggande detaljer i genomfrandet (till exempel punkt 78), vilka delvis berodde p otillrcklig vgledning frn kommissionen (punkterna 22Đ36).
The audit revealed that none of the Member States visited fully complied with the Regulations. 
Granskningen visade att ingen av de beskta medlemsstaterna efterlevde frordningarna fullt ut.
In general the Member States visited during this audit have indicated to the Court that they will review procedures and undertake improvements. 
I allmnhet har de medlemsstater som besktes under denna granskning meddelat revisionsrtten att de kommer att se ver frfarandena och genomfra frbttringar.
GiventhediversenatureoftheStructuralFundorganisationsin Member States, all Member States should review their implementation of the Regulation, and the Commission urgently needs to carry out an extensive assessment of the systems used, and give guidance where necessary. 130. 
Mot bakgrund av den varierande karaktren p medlemsstaternas strukturfondsorgani-sationer br alla medlemsstater se ver genomfrandet av frordningen, och kommissionen mste snarast genomfra en omfattande utvrdering av de system som anvnds, och ge vgledning dr s behvs. 130.
The audit of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1681/94 has shown that irregularities detected are not being communicated and progress not reported, resulting in differences in the volume and type of cases being communicated by Member States (paragraphs 98 to 106 and 111 to 114). 
Granskningen av genomfrandet av frordning (EG) nr 1681/94 har visat att upptckta oegentligheter inte anmls och att framsteg inte rapporteras, vilket ger upphov till skillnader i den mngd och de typer av fall som medlemsstaterna rapporterar (punkterna 98Đ106 och 111Đ114).
The failure of OLAF tomaintainanadequatedatabaseforasubstantialperiod(para-graphs 91 and 125) and the lack of systematic follow-up by the CommissionŐs Structural Fund DGs (paragraphs 92 and 121) have weakened the usefulness of the Regulation. 
Det faktum att OLAF inte lyckats hlla en tillfredsstllande databas under ngon lngre period (punkterna 91 och 125) och att de generaldirektorat inom kommissionen som ansvarar fr strukturfonderna inte gjorde ngon systematisk uppfljning (punkterna 92 och 121) har minskat nyttan med frordningen.
Given that OLAFŐs role to date with regard to this Regulation has been that of an intermediary in the communication system, OLAF and the other Commission services should review the current procedures with a view to having communications immediately examined and followed-up by the managing Structural Fund DGs (paragraph 94). 
Med hnsyn till att OLAF vad gller denna frordning hittills har haft rollen som frmedlare i kommunika-tionssystemet, br OLAF och vriga enheter vid kommissionen se ver nuvarande frfaranden s att meddelanden kan underskas omedelbart och fljas upp av de frvaltande strukturfondsgene-raldirektoraten (punkt 94).
The Court notes the continuing increase in reported irregularities in the year 2000. 
Revisionsrtten konstaterar att rapporterade oegentligheter kat under 2000.
Nevertheless, the Commission should carry out a series of comprehensive on-the-spot checks in Member States. 
Kommissionen br nd utfra en rad omfattande kontroller p platsen i medlemsstaterna.
This would identify shortcomings in the national systems for the detection, reporting and follow-up of irregular expenditure. 
Detta skulle leda till att brister identifieras i de nationella systemen fr upptckt, rapportering och uppfljning av oriktiga utgifter.
The Commission should give Member States clear written instructions on the nature of the required control and communication systems and on the timing and format of reports on irregularities. 
Kommissionen br ge medlemsstaterna tydliga skriftliga instruktioner angende karaktren p de obligatoriska kontroll-och kommunikationssystemen samt angende tidpunkt och format fr rapporterna om oegentligheter.
It should also make recommendations and requests for corrective measures, as provided for in the new Structural FundsŐ Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (1) (paragraphs 107 to 108). 127. 
Kommissionen br ven utfrda rekommendationer om och uppmaningar till korrigerande tgrder i enlighet med den nya rdsfrordningen om strukturfonderna (EG) nr 1260/ 99 (1) (punkterna 107Đ108).
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 laying down general provi- 
(1) Rdets frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999 om allmnna bestmmelser fr strukturfonderna (EGT L 161, 26.6.1999).
C 314/44 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.11.2001 132. 
C 314/44 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.11.2001 132.
Both Regulations should provide a means for OLAF, the aspects of both Regulations to provide effective and cohesive con-other Commission services and Member States to identify and trol and reporting systems on a clear and consistent basis through-correctweaknessesinmanagementandcontrol.Inaddition,the outtheEU. 
Bda frordningarna br ge OLAF, vriga enheter vid kommissionen och medlemsstaterna instrument fr att identifiera och korrigera brister i frvaltning och kontroll. Kommissionen br dessutom formulera frslag som kombinerar olika aspekter i de tv frordningarna fr att det utifrn en tydlig och konsekvent grund skall skapas effektiva och sammanhngande kontroll-och rapporteringssystem i hela EU.
Commission should formulate proposals to combine the various This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at the Court meeting of 19 July 2001. 
Denna rapport har antagits av revisionsrtten vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 19 juli 2001.
Source: OLAF. 
Klla: OLAF.
Amount declared by Member State Funds Member States Austria Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain Finland France Ireland Italy Luxembourg 0 Netherlands 0 Portugal Sweden United Kingdom 10 111 667 68 959 791 778 54 821 033 EAGGF Guidance (EUR) 1 363 000 273 725 225 213 13 113 144 4 742 229 4 543 382 51 424 122 681 202 160 19 211 671 Total 0: no irregularity cases to report. 
Belopp deklarerat av medlemsstaterna Anslag Medlemsstater sterrike Belgien Danmark Tyskland Grekland Spanien Finland Frankrike Irland Italien Luxemburg 0 Nederlnderna 0 Portugal Sverige Frenade kungariket Summa 10 111 667 68 959 791 778 54 821 033 EUGFJ Utveckling (euro) 1 363 000 273 725 225 213 13 113 144 4 742 229 4 543 382 51 424 122 681 202 160 19 211 671 0: Inga fall av oriktigheter att rapportera.
In particular details of recoveries made are not always conveyed to the Commission Evidence of non-compliance Ń different definition for the three Structural Funds (ERDF, EAGGF and FIFG Ń irregularity restricted to grants paid only Ń irregularities corrected without communicating Reporting and control systems Ń National coordinating authorities did not have records providing a summary over-viewofallreportedcasesandtheircur- rent situation, nor did they carry out any completeness checks or reasonableness tests by analysing which of the reporting bodies or regions submitted what volume of irregularities. 
Framfr allt vidarebefordras inte alltid detaljuppgifter till kommissionen om terbetalningar Exempel p att man inte fljer frordningarna: Ń Olika definitioner fr de tre strukturfonderna (ERUF, EUGFJ och FFU) Ń Oegentligheter begrnsade till utbetalda bidrag Ń Oegentligheter korrigeras utan meddelande Rapporterings-och kontrollsystem Ń De nationella samordnande myndigheterna hade inga register med en sammanfattning av alla rapporterade fall och den aktuella situationen fr dessa, och utfrde inga fullstndighetskontroller eller rimlighetstest genom att analysera vilka av de rapporterande organen eller regionerna som lmnade en viss mngd oegentligheter.
The federal authority for EAGGF, however, collated and registered irregularity reports received from all Lnder Ń Absence of important details on the irregularity forms submitted to OLAF, such as name of beneficiary Ń No records were actually maintained by Interior Ministry of the irregularity communications received Ń Poor quality of the records maintained by the managing authorities (cases in the period 1997 to 1998 were rejected by OLAF) Ń One national coordinating authority did not have records providing a summary overview of all reported cases and their current situation, nor did they carry out any completeness checks or reasonableness tests by analysing which of the reporting bodies or regions submitted what volume of irregularities Ń Absence of important details on the irregularity forms submitted to OLAF, such as project name, irregularity amounts or a unique reference number and the use of non-standard forms, made any meaning-fulanalysisoftheinformationdifficult Ń No material non-compliance noted at the preliminary audit stage Ń The authority responsible for ERDF in England was unable to provide a full listing of all irregularity cases in the period 1994to1999duetothefactthatitdeleted closed cases from its database once they were resolved Ń Absence of important details on the irregularity forms submitted to OLAF, such as project name, irregularity amounts or a unique reference number and the use of non-standard forms, made any meaning-fulanalysisoftheinformationdifficult Central coordination review, audit trail Ń No coordination between the three federal ministries responsible for the implementa-tionoftheStructuralFundsandthefederal coordinating ministry Ń Many of the notified irregularity cases remained unsolved for long periods. 
Den federala EUGFJ-myndigheten kol-lationerade och registrerade rapporter om oegentligheter frn alla delstater Ń Avsaknad av viktiga detaljuppgifter i de formulr fr oegentligheter som inlmnats till OLAF, ssom mottagarens namn Ń Inrikesministeriet hade inga register ver de meddelanden om oegentligheter som tagits emot.
For example, in one case, following a 16 month delay in taking initial action, a further five years passed in which multiple requests to the beneficiary for repayment of the grant aid went ignored. 
I ett fall tog det exempelvis frst 16 mnader innan inledande tgrder vidtogs, och sedan frflt ytterligare fem r under vilka mnga uppmaningar till mottagaren om terbetalning av stdet nonchalerades.
8.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES SUMMARY Both Regulations are part of a process aiming to improve the financial control by Member States of Structural Funds expenditure. 
8.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning KOMMISSIONENS SVAR SAMMANFATTNING Bda frordningarna ingr i en process som syftar till att frbttra medlemsstaternas finansiella kontroll av strukturfondernas utgifter.
This process has entailed many changes in the Member StatesŐ administrative arrangements as well as a need for resources, in order to meet the new requirements. 
Denna process har inneburit dels mnga frndringar av medlemsstaternas administrativa rutiner, dels ett behov av resurser fr att uppfylla kraven.
Many of these changes have taken place gradually over the past three years and some specific issues are becoming more visible as programmes are being wound down and closed. 
Mnga av dessa frndringar har skett gradvis under de senaste tre ren och vissa srskilda frgor klargrs i takt med att programmen trappas ned och avslutas.
The experience gained will contribute to increasing the efficiency of control systems for the 2000 to 2006 programming period. 
De erfarenheter som gjorts kommer att bidra till att ka kontrollsystemens effektivitet under programperioden 2000Đ2006.
The adoption of Regulation (EC) No 2064/97 at the end of 1997 was the culmination of a lengthy procedure which involved detailed discussions with Member States in the Structural Funds committees which had tobeconsultedontheCommissionŐsproposal.Theimplicationsoftheprincipalobligationslaiddownhad therefore been the subject of scrutiny and explanation prior even to the adoption of the Regulation. 
D frordning (EG) nr 2064/97 antogs i slutet av 1997 avslutades ett utdraget frfarande som omfattade detaljerade diskussioner med medlemsstaterna i strukturfondskommitterna som mste konsulteras avseende kommissionens frslag. Fljderna av de principiella taganden som gjorts hade sledes varit freml fr granskningar och klargranden redan innan frordningen antogs.
Since the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 2064/97, the Commission has made great efforts to give detailed guidance to Member States on the implementation of its provisions, notably through the Structural Funds audit manual, first presented in June 1998 and through the systematic treatment of questions relating to the Regulation in the framework of the bilateral coordination meetings with Member States, at the annual meeting of EU Financial Controllers in 1998,1999 and 2000 and on other occasions. 
Sedan frordning nr 2064/97 trdde i kraft har kommissionen gjort stora anstrngningar fr att lmna detaljerade vgledningar till medlemsstaterna om genomfrande av frordningens bestmmelser, srskilt genom revisionshandboken fr strukturfonderna, som frst lades fram i juni 1998 och genom den systematiska behandlingen av frgor som rr frordningen inom ramen fr bilaterala samordningsmten med medlemsstaterna, vid rsmtena fr EU:s styrekonomer samt vid andra tillfllen.
As regards assessment of the application of the Regulation, since 1999, a number of audit missions have been carried out by Structural Funds services covering compliance with certain aspects of the Regulation. 
Nr det gller bedmning av hur frordningen tillmpats sedan 1999 har strukturfondsenheterna genomfrt ett antal revisionsbesk, dr det kontrolleras att vissa aspekter av frordningens bestmmelser fljs.
In preparation for the closure of programmes from the 1994 to 1999 period, at the beginning of 2001 a full enquiry started into the implementation by all Member States of the Regulation. 
Som en frberedelse fr avslutandet av programmen frn perioden 1994Đ1999 inleddes i brjan av 2001 en fullstndig underskning av samtliga medlemsstaters genomfrande av frordningen.
Where problems are identified in the courseofthisenquiry,thenationalauthoritiesareinformedsothattheyareabletotakeremedialaction. 
Om problem upptcks vid underskningen underrttas de nationella myndigheterna, s att de kan tgrda detta.
The continued action to improve the quantity and the quality of the information received under Regulation (EC) No 1681/94, has been successful as is reflected in the increased number of communications received from Member States. 
Den fortsatta tgrden fr att ka svl informationsmngd som kvaliteten p den information som erhlls i enlighet med frordning (EG) nr 1681/94, har varit lyckad, vilket framgr av det kade antalet meddelanden som erhllits frn medlemsstaterna.
OLAF works closely with other Commission departments and Member States in order to improve persistent weaknesses. 
Europeiska byrn fr bedrgeribekmpning (OLAF) samarbetar nra med kommissionens vriga avdelningar och med medlemsstaterna, i syfte att tgrda terkommande brister.
Since December 2000, OLAF has been using the new software that was developed for communication under Regulation (EC) No 1681/94. 
OLAF anvnder sedan i december 2000 programvara som utvecklats fr meddelanden i enlighet med frordning (EG) nr 1681/94.
The new software has been tested by some Member States and is ready for deployment in all Member States. 
Den nya programvaran har testats av vissa medlemsstater och r klar att infras i samtliga medlemsstater.
The CommissionŐs White Paper on reforming the Commission details a series of measures regarding protecting the CommunityŐs financial interests and aimed at improving the systems of detection and cooperation. 
I kommissionens vitbok om reform av kommissionen anges en uppsttning tgrder fr ÓSkydd av gemenskapens ekonomiska intressenÓ som syftar till att frbttra systemen fr kartlggning och samarbete.
Furthermore, cooperation among Commission departments and between the Commission and Member States, particularly in the area of the Structural Funds, will need to be better defined to ensure that more effective action is taken to improve the prevention and detection of irregularities, fraud and corruption. 
Dessutom mste samarbetet mellan kommissionens avdelningar samt mellan kommissionen och medlemsstaterna klargras p ett bttre stt, srskilt nr det gller strukturfonderna, s att det vidtas mer verkningsfulla tgrder fr att frebygga och upptcka oegentligheter, bedrgerier och korruption.
This objective for the Structural Funds is then translated into Action 97 ÔImproving monitoring of Structural FundsŐ of the action plan of the White Paper. A Commission communication on this subject is in its final stages of adoption. 
Denna mlsttning fr strukturfonderna omvandlas sedan till tgrd 97 ÓFrbttrad vervakning av strukturfondernaÓ i vitbokens tgrdsplan. Ett meddelande frn kommissionen i detta mne hller p att slutfras.
C 314/48 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.11.2001 As regards the cooperation between OLAF and the Structural Funds DGs, the CommissionŐs newly adopted ÔAction plan for 2001 to 2003Ő for ÔProtecting the Communities financial interests Ń Fight against fraudŐ clearly recognises the need for clarification of the different departmentsŐ responsibility as regards follow-up of reported irregularities and fraud cases and recovery of amounts unduly paid. 
C 314/48 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.11.2001 Nr det gller samarbete mellan OLAF och de generaldirektorat som ansvarar fr strukturfonderna anges det tydligt i den Ótgrdsplan fr 2001Đ2003Ó som kommissionen nyligen antog fr ÓSkydd av gemenskapens ekonomiska intressen Đ bedrgeribekmpningÓ att det finns behov av att klarlgga de olika avdelningarnas ansvar betrffande uppfljning av rapporterade oegentligheter och bedrgerier samt tervinning av felaktigt utbetalda belopp.
The action plan provides that protocols will be drawn up between OLAF and the DGs responsible for the Structural Funds with regard to the follow-up of irregularities notified by the Member States under Regulation (EC) No 1681/94. 
I tgrdsplanen freskrivs att det skall upprttas protokoll mellan OLAF och de generaldirektorat som ansvarar fr strukturfonderna nr det gller uppfljning av de oegentligheter som medlemsstaterna har anmlt i enlighet med frordning (EG) nr 1681/94.
It is foreseen that these protocols will be concluded before the end of 2001. 
Enligt planerna kommer dessa protokoll att godknnas fre utgngen av r 2001.
Coordination between OLAF, Member States and the Structural Funds DGs has also been ensured in the annual control coordination meetings held previously under the responsibility of DG Audit, and from July 2000 under the responsibility of DG REGIO. 
Samordningen mellan OLAF, medlemsstaterna och de generaldirektorat som ansvarar fr strukturfonderna har ven skerstllts vid de rliga mten fr kontrollsamordning som tidigare hlls med GD Ekonomistyrning som ansvarig och som frn och med juli 2000 hlls med GD Regionalpolitik som ansvarig.
These meetings always include a discussion of irregularity cases reported by the individual Member States. 
Dessa mten omfattar alltid en diskussion om fall av oegentligheter som rapporterats av enskilda medlemsstater.
A systems audit on the application of the control provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2064/97 is currently being undertaken in all Member States, which includes an assessment of compliance with Article 7 of that Regulation concerning the treatment of irregularities. 
Det sker fr nrvarande en systemkontroll av tillmpningen av kontrollbestmmelserna i frordning (EG) nr 2064/97 i samtliga medlemsstater, vilket ven omfattar en bedmning av efterlevnaden av artikel 7 i den frordningen betrffande behandling av oegentligheter.
Article 2(5)(b) of Commission Decision 1999/352/EC lays down that OLAF is responsible for ensuring the collection and the storage of the Member StatesŐ reports on irregularities. 
Enligt artikel 2.5 b i kommissionens beslut 1999/352/EG, EKSG, EURATOM skall OLAF ansvara fr insamling och frvaring av medlemsstaternas rapporter om oegentligheter.
It is important that any database holding information on irregularities allows for a global view. 
Det r viktigt att de databaser som innehller information om oegentligheter innebr mjligheter till en helhetssyn.
Decentralised databases kept by the spending departments could not meet that objective. 
De decentraliserade databaserna vid de myndigheter som skter utbetalningar uppfyller inte dessa krav.
However, since March 2001 it has again been possible for the operational departments to have on-line access to the Member StatesŐ communications in the electronic communications registry (ECR). 
Sedan mars 2001 r det ter mjligt fr de operativa avdelningarna att on-line ta del av medlemsstaternas meddelanden i det elektroniska registret ver meddelanden (Electronic Communications Registry, ECR).
The procedures for reporting by the Member States have been harmonised at Commission level for all sectors. 
Frfarandena fr medlemsstaternas rapportering har samordnats p kommissionsniv fr samtliga sektorer.
A uniform presentation is imposed to facilitate computer processing. 
Det infrs en enhetlig presentation fr att underltta datoriserad behandling.
OLAF will be in a position to derive maximum benefit from the deployment of the new software across the Member States. 
Denna byr kommer att kunna dra stor nytta av att den nya programvaran sprids i medlemsstaterna.
The new Regulation (EC) No 448/2001 links the application of financial correction to the reports made available within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1681/94. 
I den nya frordningen (EG) nr 448/2001 knyts tillmpningen av finansiella korrigeringar till de rapporter som gjorts tillgngliga inom ramen fr frordning (EG) nr 1681/94.
It is therefore not considered necessary to combine the two Regulations. 
Det r drfr inte ndvndigt att kombinera de bda frordningarna.
The closure of a programme on the basis of the final declaration of expenditure by the national authorities is a formal process. 
Avslutningen av ett program p grundval av de nationella myndigheternas slutliga utgiftsdeklaration utgr ett formellt frfarande.
If it is established that the declaration of expenditure is incorrect, the ineligible amount will be excluded. 
Om det konstateras att utgiftsdeklarationen inte r korrekt kommer det ej stdberttigande beloppet att uteslutas.
The legislation applicable to the 2000 to 2006 programming period, notably Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, and Commission Regulations (EC) No 438/2001 and (EC) No 448/2001, significantly reinforce the financial control measures. 
Lagstiftningen fr programperioden 2000Đ2006, srskilt rdets frordning nr 1260/1999 och kommissionens frordningar (EG) nr 438/2001 och (EG) nr 448/2001, innebr en avsevrd frstrkning av de ekonomiska kontrolltgrderna.
THE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT Regulation (EC) No 2064/97 9. 
REGELVERK Frordning (EG) nr 2064/97 9.
Checks of co-financed operations are a requirement by virtue of Article 23 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88. 
I artikel 23 i rdets frordning (EEG) nr 4253/88 freskrivs kontroller av samfinansierade insatser.
The Member States have been the subject of audits by the Commission during the course of the multiannual implementation periods. 
Kommissionen har genomfrt revision avseende medlemsstaterna under de flerriga genom-frandeperioderna.
The Commission has not concentrated its audit activity at the moment of programme closure. 
Kommissionen har inte koncentrerat sin revisionsverksamhet till sjlva programavslutandet.