natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Judgments Orders European Commission 41 40 European Parliament 5 4 Council 3 3 European Maritime Safety Agency 3 Court of Justice of the European Union 2 European Food Safety Authority 2 European Medicine Agency European Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction 2 European Central Bank 1 2 European Investment Bank 1 1 European Institute for Gender Equality Frontex 1 1 European Environmental Agency 1 Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking 1 3 Europol 1 European Court of Auditors 1 European External Action Service 1 Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market 1 European Chemicals Agency 1 European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control 1 Source: European Court of Auditors. 
Europeiska lkemedelsmyndigheten Domar Beslut Europeiska kommissionen 41 40 Europaparlamentet 5 4 Rdet 3 3 Europeiska sjskerhetsbyrn 3 Europeiska unionens domstol 2 Europeiska myndigheten fr livsmedelsskerhet 2 2 Europeiska centralbanken Europeiska centrumet fr kontroll av narkotika och narkotikamissbruk 1 2 Europeiska investeringsbanken 1 1 Europeiska jmstlldhetsinstitutet 1 Frontex 1 Europeiska miljbyrn 1 Europeiska gemensamma fretaget fr Iter och utveckling av fusionsenergi 1 3 Europol 1 Europeiska revisionsrtten 1 Europeiska utrikestjnsten 1 Kontoret fr harmonisering i den inre marknaden 1 Europeiska kemikaliemyndigheten 1 Europeiskt centrum fr frebyggande och kontroll av sjukdomar 1 Klla: Europeiska revisionsrtten.
Observations 45 82 During the period examined, actions for annulment were successful in 13 cases, based on the finding that the contracting authority decided unlawfully38. 
Iakttagelser 45 82 Under den period som vi granskade godkndes ogiltighetstalan i 13 fall p grund av att den upphandlande myndigheten hade fattat ett olagligt beslut38.
The av‐ erage duration of proceedings of the General Court in the area of public procure‐ ment (judgments) was around 35 months. 
I genomsnitt pgick tribunalens handlggning av renden rrande offentlig upphandling (domar) i omkring 35 mnader.
83 The most important damage suffered by participants in a tendering procedure is the loss of profit which they would have gained had they been awarded the con‐ tract. 
83 Den strsta skadan fr anbudsgivare vars anbud frkastas r frlusten av de intkter som de skulle ha ftt om de hade tilldelats kontraktet.
During the period examined (2009‐2014) there were no successful actions for damages. 
Under den underskta perioden (2009Đ2014) frekom ingen framgngsrik skadestndstalan.
However, in two more recent cases39 the General Court ordered the contracting authority to pay compensation for the damages suffered by the economic operator for the loss of an opportunity to be awarded a contract. 
I tv senare renden39 har tribunalen emellertid beordrat den upphandlande myndigheten att betala skadestnd till en ekonomisk aktr som gtt miste om mjligheten att tilldelas ett kontrakt.
This may suggest that the General Court is now more inclined to award damages in such cases. 
Det kan tyda p att tribunalen nu r bengnare att utdma skadestnd i sdana fall.
84 During the period examined there were no successful applications for interim measures40 and all 16 appeals brought by economic operators to the Court of Jus‐ tice against decisions of the General Court were unsuccessful. 
84 Under den underskta perioden godkndes ingen anskan om interimistiska tgrder40 och samtliga 16 verklaganden frn ekonomiska aktrer mot tribunalens beslut frkastades av domstolen.
However, in one of the most significant decisions of 2015 concerning EU institutions’ public procure‐ ment procedures41, the Vice‐President of the Court of Justice ruled that, even if the harm invoked is not irreparable, the sufficiently manifest and serious nature of the illegalities identified prima facie may justify the imposition of interim measures. 
I ett av 2015 rs viktigaste beslut om EU-institutionernas offentliga upphandlingsfrfaranden41 fastslog domstolens vice ordfrande att den tillrckligt uppenbara och allvarliga karaktren hos de lagbrott som identifierats vid frsta anblick kan motivera interimistiska tgrder, trots att en irreparabel skada inte freligger.
The Vice‐President of the Court of Justice thus favourably received the General Court’s new and more flexible approach as regards the conditions to grant interim measures referring to the right to effective judicial protection42. 
Domstolens vice ordfrande stllde sig drigenom positiv till tribunalens nya och flexiblare synstt nr det gllde villkoren fr att godknna interimistiska tgrder genom att hnvisa till rtten till effektivt rttsligt skydd42.
The Ombudsman sometimes found friendly solutions but rapid reaction in procurement cases is hampered by procedural rules 85 The European Ombudsman investigates complaints of maladministration in the EU institutions and bodies, including complaints concerning public procure‐ ment activities. 
Ombudsmannen kunde ibland n uppgrelser i godo, men snabba beslut i upphandlingsrenden hindras av procedurreglerna 85 Europeiska ombudsmannen utreder klagoml om administrativa missfrhllanden inom EU:s institutioner och organ, bland annat klagoml som rr offentlig upphandling.
Through a search on the Ombudsman’s website, we identified 60 decisions related to public procurement over the period from 18 February 200843 to 17 February 201544. 
Vid en skning p ombudsmannens webbplats fann vi 60 beslut med koppling till offentlig upphandling under perioden 18 februari 200843 till 17 februari 201544.
The majority of these 60 decisions (34 cases) related to procurement activities outside the EU, frequently involving EU Delegations. 
Strsta delen av dessa 60 beslut (34 stycken) gllde upphandlingar utanfr EU, i mnga fall med koppling till EU-delegationer.
The analysis of the 60 decisions is summarised in Table 4. 
Tabell 4 innehller en sammanfattning av analysen av de 60 besluten.
38 It is settled case‐law that the EU institutions have broad discretion with regard to the factors to be taken into account for the purpose of awarding a contract. 
38 Det har faststllts i rttspraxis att EU-institutionerna har stort handlingsutrymme nr det gller vilka faktorer som ska beaktas vid tilldelning av kontrakt.
Review by the General Court must be limited to checking that the rules governing the procedure and statement of reasons are complied with, the facts are correct and there is no manifest error of assessment or misuse of powers. 
Tribunalens prvning mste begrnsas till att kontrollera om bestmmelserna from frfarandet och motiveringen har efterlevts, om fakta i rendet r korrekta och om det frekommit uppenbara bedmningsfel eller uppenbart maktmissbruk.
In 10 out of the 13 cases the reason for annulment of the decision was non‐compliance of the contracting authority with its duty to state reasons. 
I tio av de tretton rendena ogiltigfrklarades tilldelningsbeslutet p grund av att den upphandlande myndigheten inte hade uppfyllt kravet p att tillhandahlla en motivering.
39 Case T‐299/11 of 7 October 2015 (European Dynamics v OHIM) (subject to appeal in pending case C‐677/15 P) and Case T‐199/14 of 29 October 2015 (Vanbreda Risk & Benefits v Commission). 
39 Dom av den 7 oktober 2015 i ml T-299/11, (European Dynamics Luxembourg m.fl. mot harmoniseringskontoret) (har verklagats i pgende ml C-677/15/ P) och dom av den 29 oktober 2015 i ml T-199/14, (Vanbreda Risk & Benefits mot kommissionen).
Furthermore, in two cases the contracting authority annulled the tender procedure prior to the decision of the General Court. 
I tv renden avslutade den upphandlande myndigheten upphandlingsfrfarandet innan tribunalen hade fattat beslut.
41 C‐35/15 P(R), European Commission v Vanbreda Risk & Benefits. 
41 Ml C-35/15 P(R), Europeiska kommissionen mot Vanbreda Risk & Benefits.
42 However, in the case at hand the Vice‐President rejected the application for interim measures as the Commission had complied with the standstill period before the signature of the contract and the contract in question was concluded long before the application for interim measures was made. 
42 I det aktuella mlet avslog dock vice ordfranden anskan om interimistiska tgrder eftersom kommissionen hade respekterat frysningsperioden innan kontraktet undertecknades och det aktuella kontraktet hade ingtts lngt innan anskan om interimistiska tgrder lmnades in.
43 First occurrence of a decision related to public procurement under the subject matter ‘Award of tenders or grants’. 
43 Det frsta beslutet som gllde offentlig upphandling p omrdet ÓTilldelning av kontrakt och bidragÓ.
44 During this 7‐year period the Ombudsman received 86 admissible complaints concerning tenders. 
44 Under denna sjursperiod mottog ombudsmannen 86 prvningsbara klagoml om upphandlingar.
These included the 60 decisions available from the internet database, 22 cases where the Ombudsman did not find grounds to launch an inquiry and 4 cases which were dropped by the complainants. 
Dr ingr de 60 beslut som finns tillgngliga via databasen p internet, 22 renden dr ombudsmannen inte ansg att det fanns skl fr att inleda en utredning och fyra renden som lades ner p initiativ av klaganden.
Observations 46 Ombudsman’s decisions concerning public procurement — overview of results Category Number of occurrences Explanation Total number of decisions 60 Total number of decisions related to public procurement published on the Ombudsman’s website under subject matter ‘Award of tender or grants’. 
Iakttagelser 46 Ombudsmannens beslut om offentlig upphandling Đ sammanfattning av resultaten Kategori Antal renden Frklaring Totalt antal beslut 60 Det totala antalet beslut med koppling till offentlig upphandling som offentliggjorts p ombudsmannens webbplats under mnesomrdet ÓTilldelning av kontrakt och bidragÓ.
This category includes the following subcategories: Information provided 6 The friendly solution consisted of making available satisfactory infor‐ mation or explanation of reasons. 
I denna kategori ingr fljande underkategorier: Tillhandahllande av information 6 Uppgrelsen i godo bestod av att tillrcklig information eller en motivering tillhandahlls.
Payment of costs 1 The friendly solution consisted of reimbursement of justified costs borne by the complainant. 
Betalning av kostnader 1 Uppgrelsen i godo innebar att klaganden fick ersttning fr sina motiverade kostnader.
Solution not specified (under negotiation) 1 Negotiations on a friendly solution took place but the result is not known. 
Information om lsning saknas (frhandling pgr) 1 Frhandlingar om en uppgrelse i godo pgick men resultatet r inte knt.
This category includes the following subcategories: Friendly solution rejected 5 The proposed friendly solution was rejected by the institution con‐ cerned in four out of the five cases. 
I denna kategori ingr fljande underkategorier: Frkastande av en uppgrelse i godo 5 Den freslagna uppgrelsen i godo frkastades av den berrda institutionen i fyra av fem fall.
Friendly solution not necessary 2 A friendly solution was not necessary because the claim was not exam‐ ined as the procedure had been cancelled or it was not needed because it had no consequence on the outcome of the procedure. 
Inget behov av en uppgrelse i godo 2 En uppgrelse i godo var inte ndvndig eftersom upphandlingen avbrts innan klagomlet kunde utredas eller s pverkade det inte resultatet av frfarandet.
Case withdrawn by complainant 1 Case was withdrawn by the complainant without further explanation. 
Klagomlet drogs tillbaka av klaganden 1 Klagomlet drogs tillbaka av klaganden utan ytterligare frklaring.
However, complaints ‘must be preceded by the appropriate administrative approaches to the institutions and bodies concerned’45 before the Ombudsman may launch an enquiry. 
Emellertid mste klagoml Ófregs av lmpliga hnvndelser till de berrda institutionerna och organenÓ45 innan ombudsmannen har rtt att inleda en utredning.
This means that the economic operator has first to address his complaint to the institution concerned and wait for a reply. 
Det innebr att den ekonomiska aktren frst mste vnda sig med sitt klagoml till den berrda institutionen och invnta svar.
This lengthens the process and virtually rules out a swift intervention of the Ombudsman before a contract is signed. 
Detta frlnger processen och gr det nrmast omjligt fr ombudsmannen att snabbt utreda rendet innan ett kontrakt skrivs under.
87 When a friendly solution was agreed on the basis of a proposal by the Ombuds‐ man, it usually consisted of granting the complainant access to information or giving a satisfactory explanation of the reasons for rejecting his tender. 
87 I de fall d parterna ndde en uppgrelse i godo baserat p ombudsmannens frslag bestod den vanligtvis av att klaganden fick tillgng till information eller en tillfredsstllande frklaring av sklen till att hans eller hennes anbud hade frkastats.
No Ombudsman’s inquiries have ever resulted in the cancellation of an award deci‐ sion and the reopening of a procurement procedure by an EU institution. 
Ombudsmannens utredningar har aldrig lett till att ett upphandlingsbeslut har upphvts och en EU-institutions upphandlingsfrfarande terupptagits.
Reme‐ dial action has never consisted of compensation to the complainant for loss of a procurement opportunity or loss of profit. 
De korrigerande tgrder som tillmpats har aldrig besttt av ersttning till den klagande parten fr frlust av en upphandlingsmjlighet eller intkter.
Reimbursement of costs incurred by the complainant because of his participation in a procurement procedure was granted once. 
I ett enda fall har en klagandes kostnader fr att delta i upphandlingsfrfarandet ersatts.
The Ombudsman is proactive and includes in her decisions ‘further remarks’ which are recommendations that are intended to encourage the EU institutions to change their practices in the future. 
Ombudsmannen agerar proaktivt och inkluderar i sina beslut Óytterligare anmrkningarÓ, vilket r rekommendationer som syftar till att uppmana EU-institutionerna att ndra sitt framtida handlande.
Examples of ‘further remarks’ are in Box 12. 
Exempel p sdana ytterligare anmrkningar finns i ruta 12.
Any citizen and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to petition the European Parliament. 
Varje medborgare och varje fysisk eller juridisk person som r bosatt eller har sitt stadgeenliga ste i en medlemsstat har rtt att gra framstllningar till Europaparlamentet.
However, the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament stated on its Petitions Portal that petitions concerning cases of maladministration by the EU institutions would be inadmissible: ‘Inadmissibility of a petition (...) Please note that questions concerning maladministration within the Institutions or bodies of the EU should be addressed to the European Ombudsman.’ 
Europaparlamentets utskott fr framstllningar angav emellertid p sin webbportal fr framstllningar att framstllningar som rr administrativa missfrhllanden inom EU:s institutioner eller organ inte skulle tas emot och att sdana klagoml i stllet ska riktas till Europeiska ombudsmannen.
45 See Article 2(4) of the Decision of the European Parliament of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p. 
Det innebr att utskottet uteslt framstllningar om administrativa missfrhllanden i samband med EU-institutionernas offentliga upphandlingar. mars 1994 om freskrifter och allmnna villkor fr ombudsmannens mbetsutvning (EGT L 113, 4.5.1994, s.
46 See Article 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 
46 Se artikel 44 i EU-stadgan om de grundlggande rttigheterna.
Observations 48 Examples of Ombudsman’s further remarks ‘Subject to the terms of the contract, in future cases in which contractors ask whether or not their contract will be renewed, the Publications Office could at least indicate the approximate timeframe within which it intends to take a decision.’ 
Iakttagelser 48 Exempel p ombudsmannens ytterligare anmrkningar I framtida renden dr en kontraktspart begr att f veta om dennes kontrakt kommer att frlngas eller inte skulle Publikationsbyrn, i enlighet med kontraktets villkor, tminstone kunna ange en ungefrlig tidsfrist fr utfrdande av sitt beslut.
(Decision of the European Ombudsman closing the inquiry into complaint 1922/2010/(VIK)ER against the Publications Office of the European Union (19/12/2013)) ‘In cases, such as the present one, where, after having cancelled a tender procedure, an EU Delegation choos‐ es to proceed to a negotiated procedure with some of the initial tenderers, the Delegation would be well advised to consider informing the unsuccessful tenderers openly and proactively about that development. 
(Ombudsmannens beslut i rende 1922/2010/(VIK)ER mot Europeiska unionens publikationsbyr, den 19 december 2013.) I renden ssom detta dr en EU-delegation, efter att ha avbrutit en anbudsinfordran, vljer att i stllet inleda ett frhandlat frfarande med ngra av de ursprungliga anbudsgivarna, br delegationen ppet och proaktivt informera de anbudsgivare vars anbud frkastats om denna utveckling.
(Decision of the European Ombudsman closing his inquiry into complaint 1325/2011/ VL against the European Commission (17/05/2013)) ‘In view of the terminological confusion that the present case revealed and in order to avoid any possible misunderstandings in the future, the Ombudsman considers it useful to invite the Commission to review the documentation it provides in the context of its procurement procedures, so as to eliminate any lack of preci‐ sion and terminological inconsistency and to ensure that tenderers are clearly and unambiguously informed of the eligibility conditions relating to their establishment/incorporation/registration/nationality. 
(Ombudsmannens beslut i rende 1325/2011/VL mot Europeiska kommissionen, den 17 maj 2013.) ÓNr det slutligen gllde den terminologiska frvirringen i detta rende, och fr att undvika eventuella missfrstnd i framtiden, ansg ombudsmannen att kommissionen br se ver den dokumentation den tillhandahller i samband med upphandlingar fr att eliminera vagheter och terminologiska inkonsekvenser och se till att anbudsgivarna fr klar och entydig information om vilka krav som ska vara uppfyllda avseende etablering/ ste/registrering/nationalitet.
It would also be useful if, in the context of this review, the Commission could ensure that such key terms in the procure‐ ment process are clearly defined either in the procurement notice itself or in a document to which it makes clear reference and which is easily accessible.’ (Decision of the European Ombudsman closing his inquiry into complaint 920/2010/VIK against the European Commission (18/07/2011)) Box 12 
Ombudsmannen konstaterade att kommissionen i samband med den versynen ocks br se till att sdana nyckelbegrepp i upphandlingsfrfaranden definieras tydligt, antingen i sjlva upphandlingsmeddelandet eller i ett dokument som meddelandet tydligt hnvisar till och som r ltt tillgng-ligt.Ó (Ombudsmannens beslut i rende 920/2010/VIK mot Europeiska kommissionen, den 18 juli 2011.) Ruta 12
Observations 49 Section IV — Transparency of results and mutual learning are not systematically enforced Information on the outcome of the EU institutions’ procurement activities is not accessible in a way which would allow effective monitoring by the discharge authority and the wider public 89 One of the most effective ways of fighting corruption and malpractice in public procurement and of preventing unjustified restrictions on competition is by in‐ creasing the transparency of processes and procedures. Transparency is not only important for economic operators but also for the discharge authority and the wider public who can contribute to improving the performance of the EU institu‐ tions by monitoring procurement activities. 
Iakttagelser 49 Avdelning IV Đ ppenhet om resultat och msesidigt lrande tillmpas inte systematiskt Information om resultaten av EU-institutionernas upphandlingsverksamhet r inte tillgnglig p ett stt som gr att myndigheten som beviljar ansvarsfrihet och allmnheten kan utva effektiv vervakning 89 Ett av de effektivaste stten att bekmpa korruption och missfrhllanden i samband med offentlig upphandling och att frebygga omotiverade begrnsningar av konkurrensen r att ka ppenheten nr det gller processer och frfaranden. ppenhet r inte bara viktigt fr ekonomiska aktrer utan ven fr myndigheten som beviljar ansvarsfrihet och fr allmnheten som kan hjlpa till att frbttra EU-institutionernas verksamhet genom att vervaka upphandlingsverksamheten.
Effective monitoring requires harmonised information to be found in a single place on the internet 90 To allow effective monitoring by stakeholders the following minimum infor‐ mation needs to be available in a single place on the internet and continually updated for every contract above 15 000 euros once it has been signed by an EU institution, indicating: (a) the subject of the contract; (b) the type of contract; (c) the value of the contract; (d) the duration of the contract; (e) the type of award procedure (with a justification in the case of the negotiated procedure without prior publication); (f) the award criteria and their weighting; (g) the number of tenders received and the number of tenders taken into con‐ sideration for the final award decision (with a breakdown by Member States/ third countries and indicating the number of tenders from SMEs); 
Effektiv vervakning krver att man kan hitta harmoniserad information p en enda webbplats 90 Fr att intresserade parter ska kunna utva effektiv vervakning mste tminstone fljande information finnas tillgnglig p en och samma webbplats och uppdateras kontinuerligt fr varje kontrakt med ett vrde ver 15 000 euro s snart det har undertecknats av en EU-institution: a) Upphandlingens syfte. b) Typ av upphandling. c) Kontraktets vrde. d) Kontraktets lptid. e) Typ av tilldelningsfrfarande (med en motivering i de fall det rr sig om ett frhandlat frfarande utan fregende offentliggrande av ett upphandlingsmeddelande). f) Tilldelningskriterier och viktningen av dessa. g) Antal anbud som mottagits och antal anbud som beaktats infr det slutliga tilldelningsbeslutet (uppdelat per medlemsstat/tredjeland och med uppgift om antalet anbud frn sm och medelstora fretag).
Observations 50 (h) the name and address of the successful tenderer including information whether the successful tenderer is an SME; (i) the proportion of the contract likely to be subcontracted to third parties. 
Iakttagelser 50 h) Den valda anbudsgivarens namn och adress samt information om huruvida denne r ett litet eller medelstort fretag. i) Den andel av kontraktet som troligen kommer att lggas ut p entreprenad.
91 Such a repository of information related to EU contracts should also provide relevant links to other documents (e.g. procurement documents, notices in TED, copies of the contracts signed). 
91 Ett sdant informationsarkiv br ocks innehlla relevanta lnkar till andra dokument (till exempel upphandlingsdokument, meddelanden i TED och kopior av undertecknade kontrakt).
Information is provided piecemeal 92 Currently there are no tools which allow an overall view of the outcome of the EU institutions’ procurement activities. 
Informationen presenteras inte som en helhet 92 Fr nrvarande finns det inga verktyg med vars hjlp man kan f en verblick ver resultaten av alla EU-institutioners upphandlingsverksamhet.
Not all closed procurement procedures can be found in TED as the publication of contract award notices is not manda‐ tory in all cases. 
TED innehller inte alla avslutade upphandlingsfrfaranden eftersom det inte alltid r obligatoriskt att offentliggra tilldelningsbeslut.