natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These were animals that had been reported as live ÔexitsŐ by one keeper but were not registered as ÔentriesŐ by another keeper. The causes of this situation were either absence of notification and notification errors, or recording errors and miscellaneous computer errors. 
Dessa djur hade anmlts som ÓavrestaÓ levande av en djurhllare, men de hade inte anmlts som anlnda hos ngon annan djurhllare. Orsakerna till detta var antingen att anmlningar inte hade gjorts eller var felaktiga eller att det hade begtts fel vid inmatningen av data eller uppsttt andra datatekniska problem.
In Great Britain, the same type of situation had led the authorities to set up a Ôlong dead programmeŐ which made it possible to eliminate anomalies relating to animals which must be considered dead. 
I Storbritannien ledde samma typ av situation till att myndigheterna infrde ett Ólong dead programmeÓ som gjorde det mjligt att eliminera sdana anomalier som gllde djur som kunde anses som dda.
Where an animal was registered with two keepers at the same time, the German and British systems generated an anomaly on the first day of the overlap. 
Nr ett djur var registrerat hos tv olika djurhllare samtidigt genererade de brittiska och tyska systemen en anomali frn och med den frsta verlappningsdagen, det franska systemet genererade en anomali om verlappningen varade 15 dagar och det italienska systemet tog inte alls denna anomali i beaktande.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/19 51. 
4.2.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 29/19 53.
The Member States had developed few quality indicators for the national databases. 
Medlemsstaterna hade utvecklat f kvalitetsindikatorer fr databaserna.
The absence of a defined compatible format for exchanging data between national databases prevents complete traceability in respect of cattle moving from one Member State to another. 
Eftersom det saknas ett kompatibelt format fr informationsutbyte mellan nationella databaser gr det inte att helt spra ntkreatur som frflyttas frn en medlemstat till en annan.
C 29/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 54. 
C 29/20 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 4.2.2005 54.
When the databases were set up, the Commission did not provide assistance and did not give any advice to those Member States that requested it. 
Kommissionen hjlpte inte till nr databaserna infrdes och gav inte rd till de medlemsstater som bad om det.
For example, Great Britain asked the Commission for assistance during the design phase of its system, but it was refused. 
Storbritannien bad kommissionen om hjlp nr deras system utvecklades men fick ingen hjlp.
Absence of criteria for recognition of the fully operational character of databases 55. 
Det saknas kriterier fr godknnande av att databaserna r fullt fungerande 55.
The Commission issues an opinion (1) on the fully operational character of the national databases before a Member State abolishes passports for movements of cattle on its national territory (see paragraph 26). 
Kommissionen gr en bedmning (1) av om den nationella databasen r fullt fungerande innan medlemsstaten kan upphra med pass fr frflyttning av ntkreatur p sitt nationella territorium (se punkt 26).
The Commission bases this recognition that the databases are fully operational on an analysis of Member StatesŐ replies to a questionnaire and a two-day on-the-spot visit to the Member States making the request. 
Kommissionen bygger sitt godknnande av databasen som fullt fungerande p en analys av medlemsstaternas svar p ett frgeformulr och p ett tv dagar lngt besk p plats i de medlemsstater som begr det.
The object of this visit is a presentation of the database in operation. 
Syftet med besket r att man skall presentera hur databasen fungerar.
The Commission then publishes its decision recognising the national database to be fully operational. 
Kommissionen offentliggr sedan beslutet om att den nationella databasen r fullt fungerande.
Box 6 contains some examples of conditions found in Commission decisions recognising the operational character of databases. 
I ruta 6 finns ngra exempel p villkor som finns med i kommissionens beslut om godknnande av att databaserna r fullt fungerande.
Box 6 The Commission has very often laid down conditions with which the Member State must comply, to ensure that its database is entirely reliable. 
Ruta 6 Kommissionen har ofta satt upp villkor som en medlemsstat mste flja fr att dess databas skall vara fullstndigt tillfrlitlig.
When the Luxembourg database was recognised as fully operational, the Commission brought to light, among other things, two weaknesses, namely that the competent authority was unable to correct errors or omissions rapidly and that the time allowed for reporting movements, births and deaths was more than seven days. 
Vid godknnandet av den luxemburgska databasen pekade kommissionen srskilt p tv brister, nmligen att den behriga myndigheten inte snabbt kunde rtta till fel och brister och att tidsfristen fr anmlan av djur som frflyttas, fds eller dr var lngre n sju dagar.
In the case of Denmark, the Commission drew attention to the same two weaknesses. 
Fr Danmarks del ptalade kommissionen samma tv brister.
In addition, passports were not authenticated and there was no reporting of premium status. 
Dessutom fanns ingen garanti fr att passen var kta, och bidragsstatus nmndes inte.
In Belgium, not all types of movement were recorded in the database and the competent authority was unable to correct errors or omissions rapidly. 
Fr Belgiens del registrerades inte alla typer av frflyttningar i databasen, och den behriga myndigheten kunde inte snabbt rtta till fel och brister.
In the Netherlands, the competent authority was unable to correct errors or omissions rapidly, the time allowed for reporting movements, births and deaths was more than seven days and the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2630/97 were not applied correctly. 
Fr Nederlndernas del kunde den behriga myndigheten inte snabbt rtta till fel och brister, tid fr anmlan av djur som frflyttades, fd-des eller dog var lngre n sju dagar, och bestmmelserna i frordning (EG) nr 2630/97 tillmpades inte korrekt.
There were delays in correcting errors and not all provisions concerning new identification of cattle in case of loss of ear tags were complied with. 
Felen rttades till fr sent, och man hade inte fljt alla bestmmelser om ny identifiering av ntkreatur vid bort-tappade ronmrken.
In Northern Ireland, the authorities were advised to take the necessary measures to improve the reliability of data recording, to improve procedures relating to the replacement of ear tags, especially the deadlines for distribution and traceability. 
I Nordirland uppmanades myndigheterna att vidta ndvndiga tgrder fr att frbttra tillfrlitligheten i registreringen av uppgifter fr att frbttra frfarandena fr utbyte av ronmrken, nrmare bestmt tidsfristerna fr distribution och mjligheten att spra djur.
They were also to improve the procedures for authentification and validation of passports. 
De br ven frbttra frfarandena fr godknnande och validering av pass.
In France, the authorities were recommended to reduce the time allowed for reporting movements, births and deaths to seven days, to record all animal movements and to correct rapidly any error or omission discovered during on-the-spot checks. 
I Frankrike uppmanades myndigheterna att begrnsa tidsfristen fr anmlan av djur som frflyttas, fds och dr till sju dagar, att registrera all frflyttning av djur och att snabbt rtta till alla fel och brister som upptckts vid kontrollerna p plats.
The conditions entered in the CommissionŐs decisions recognising the fully operational character of the databases and the findings of the Food and Veterinary Office and the Directorate-General for Agriculture concerning cattle identification and registration did not guarantee that the system in place allowed the conditions required by the legislation to be verified, in respect of reporting deadlines, the absence of reports, or penalties. 
Villkoren i kommissionens beslut om att databaserna r fullt fungerande och de konstateranden som gjorts av kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor och av generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk nr det gller identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur r inte ngon garanti fr att det med det gllande systemet r mjligt att bekrfta villkoren i frordningarna vad gller tidsfrister fr anmlningar, vad som hnder nr det inte grs anmlningar och nr det gller pfljder.
The sole purpose of the decision to recognise the fully operational character of a database was to confirm that the database was fully operational in the technical sense. 
Beslutet om godknnande av att en databas r fungerande tjnade endast till att bekrfta att databasen var fullt fungerande ur teknisk synvinkel.
According to the Commission, this recognition is limited to approving the design of the system set up by a Member State. 
Enligt kommissionen r detta godknnande endast till fr att godknna utformningen av det system som en viss medlemsstat har infrt.
In addition, all decisions recognising databases to be fully operational contain conditions with suspensive effect linked to a formal commitment by the Member States concerned to make a certain number of improvements to the operation of the databases before the date on which formal recognition comes into effect. 
Dessutom innehller alla beslut om godknnande av att databaserna r fungerande suspensiva villkor kopplade till de berrda medlemsstaternas formella frbindelse att, innan det datum d det officella godknnandet trder i kraft, vidta ett visst antal tgrder fr att databaserna skall fungera bttre.
Since 2001, the Commission has undertaken to monitor, systematically, whether the recommendations issued have actually been implemented. 
Sedan 2001 har kommissionen systematiskt fljt upp att rekommendationerna verkligen har genomfrts.
Since 2001, the Food and Veterinary Office has carried out various audit missions concerning traceability, and the findings are taken into account in the evaluation of the design and functioning of the databases. 
Sedan 2001 gr kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor olika granskningsbesk fr att kontrollera mjligheterna att spra djur, och granskningsresultatet tas med i utvrderingen av hur databaserna r utformade och hur de fungerar.
Although this approach has been adopted, it was not applied at the time of the first evaluations of the operational character of the databases. 
Detta r det frfaringsstt som har antagits, men s var det inte vid de frsta utvrderingarna av om databaserna var fungerande.
These in-depth checks are now used as a basis for evaluating whether the databases are operational. 
Dessa ingende kontroller ligger till grund fr utvrderingar av om databaserna r fungerande.
At the beginning of 2004, the databases of nine Member States and that of Northern Ireland had been recognised by the Commission, on the dates shown in table 5. 
I brjan av 2004 hade kommissionen godknt databaserna i nio medlemsstater och i Nordirland vid de datum som nmns i tabell 5.
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/21 Table 5 Dates of Commission decisions recognising the fully operational character of databases Member State (or region) Decision 1999/317/EC 1999/375/EC 1999/376/EC 1999/377/EC 1999/546/EC 1999/571/EC 1999/693/EC 1999/696/EC France Germany 2002/67/EC Date of decision Finland Actual date of recognition 1 May 1999 1 August 1999 1 October 1999 1 July 1999 1 October 1999 1 October 1999 1 November 1999 1 November 1999 2 September 2001 Not specified 62. the draft recognition decision has been suspended by the Commission. These delays in the decision process are prejudicial to the Member States concerned. Moreover, two Member States (Spain and Ireland) granted themselves the benefits of recognition in the absence of any formal decision on the part of the Commission by reducing their rates of checks from 10 to 5 %. 
4.2.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning Tabell 5 Datum fr kommissionens beslut om att godknna databaserna som fullt fungerande C 29/21 Medlemsstat (eller region) Finland Luxemburg Danmark Belgien Nederlnderna sterrike Sverige Frenade kungariket (Nordirland) Frankrike Tyskland 2002/67/EG Datum fr faktiskt godknnande 1 maj 1999 1 augusti 1999 1 oktober 1999 1 juli 1999 1 oktober 1999 1 oktober 1999 1 november 1999 1 november 1999 2 september 2001 Inte angivet Beslut 1999/317/EG 1999/375/EG 1999/376/EG 1999/377/EG 1999/546/EG 1999/571/EG 1999/693/EG 1999/696/EG Datum fr beslutet 28 april 1999 19 maj 1999 19 maj 1999 19 maj 1999 13 juli 1999 28 juli 1999 5 oktober 1999 11 oktober 1999 7 maj 2001 28 januari 2002 61.
The databases of six Member States had still not been recognised at the beginning of 2004. 
Sex medlemsstaters databaser hade nnu inte godknts i brjan av 2004.
These were Greece, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and the United Kingdom (Great Britain). 
Det gller Grekland, Spanien, Irland, Italien, Portugal och Frenade kungariket (Storbritannien).
The situation is set out in detail in box 7. 
Detaljerad information finns i ruta 7.
Box 7 In the case of Portugal, the Commission has suspended the draft recognition decision as from the date of their visit on 19 October 2000, because of the weaknesses found during the visit by DG SANCO inspectors. 
Ruta 7 Fr Portugals del skt kommissionens avdelningar upp beslutet om godknnande efter ett besk den 19 oktober 2000 d kontrollrerna frn generaldirektoratet fr hlsa och konsumentskydd konstaterade att det finns brister.
The Spanish authorities returned the CommissionŐs questionnaire on 24 July 2001. 
De spanska myndigheterna tersnde frgeformulret till kommissionen den 24 juli 2001.
They claimed they were ready for the CommissionŐs visit in connection with the official recognition of their database, but asked that the date on which recognition took effect should be the date on which the questionnaire was sent to the Commission. 
De frklarade sig vara beredda att ta emot besk frn kommissionen fr det officiella godknnandet av databasen, men ville att det faststllda datumet fr det verkliga godknnandet skulle vara det datum d frgeformulret sndes till kommissionen.
Since 2002, the rate of on-the-spot checks has been reduced to 5 %. 
Sedan 2002 har kontrollerna p plats minskat till 5 %.
The Commission visited Great Britain on 20 and 21 November 2001. 
Kommissionen beskte Storbritannien den 20 och 21 november 2001.
A draft decision was drawn up proposing 1 April 2002 as the date on which the decision should come into effect, but here, too, the Commission has suspended the decision because of weaknesses found during an inspection. 
Ett frslag till beslut hade lagts fram dr man freslog den 1 april 2002 som datum fr ikrafttrdande, men ven i detta fall har kommissionens avdelningar skjutit upp beslutet p grund av de brister som konstaterades p plats.
In a letter of 23 January 2002, the Irish authorities simply informed the Commission that their database was fully operational and for this reason they were reducing the rate of on-the-spot checks from 10 to 5 %. 
I ett brev av den 23 januari 2002 informerade de irlndska myndigheterna helt enkelt kommissionen om att deras databas var fullt fungerande och att de drfr minskade kontrollerna p plats frn 10 % till 5 %.
As far as Italy is concerned, the Commission received the completed standard questionnaire on 28 February 2002. 
Nr det gller Italien mottog kommissionen det ifyllda standardfor-mulret den 28 februari 2002.
The Italian authorities said that they were ready to receive the CommissionŐs visit for official recognition of their database. 
De italienska myndigheterna frklarade sig vara beredda att ta emot besk frn kommissionen fr godknnande av databasen.
In a letter of 24 July 2001, the Greek authorities informed the Commission about their plans for setting up the database, which was scheduled to become operational in June 2002. 
I ett brev den 24 juli 2001 meddelade de grekiska myndigheterna kommissionen att de planerade infra en databas som skulle vara redo att tas i bruk i juni 2002.
For some Member States (Portugal and United Kingdom), 
2001/399/EG Fr vissa medlemsstater (Portugal och Frenade kungari-
C 29/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 64. 
C 29/22 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 4.2.2005 64.
The Commission recognised the database for Northern Ireland as fully operational as from 1 November 1999. 
Kommissionen godknde Nordirlands databas som fullt fungerande frn och med den 1 november 1999.
The setting-up of two separate databases in the United Kingdom and the individual recognition of one of them by the Commission is not in conformity with Community legislation. 
Att Frenade kungariket har infrt tv separata databaser och att kommissionen har godknt en av dem r inte i enlighet med gemenskapslagstiftningen.
The incompatibility of the two databases means that they cannot be treated as a single database for operational purposes. 
Eftersom de tv databaserna r inkompatibla gr det inte praktiskt att sl samman dem till en enda databas.
Supervision by the Commission 65. 
Kommissionens vervakning 65.
Until 1999 responsibility for identification and registration lay with DG Agriculture. 
Fram till 1999 var det generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk som hade ansvaret fr identifiering och registrering.
Since then, the responsibility has been transferred to the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection (1). 
Drefter verfrdes ansvaret till generaldirektoratet fr hlsa och konsumentskydd (1).
Nevertheless, it is DG Agriculture (IACS) which is responsible for control and payment of animal premiums. 
Ansvaret fr kontroller och utbetalning av djurbidrag ligger dock p generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk (det integrerade administrations-och kontrollsystemet, IACS).
Since 1999 it has only been possible for animal premiums for cattle to be paid if the cattle in question have been correctly identified and registered in the Community system (2). 
Sedan 1999 kan djurbidrag endast ges fr ntkreatur som har identifierats och registrerats korrekt i systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur (2).
The IACS legislation, like the legislation on the identification system, allows Member States to reduce the minimum rate of on-the-spot checks from 10 to 5 % when the national database is fully operational and has allowed effective cross-checks to be carried out within the IACS framework for more than one year (3). 
Enligt frordningarna om det integrerade administrations-och kontrollsystemet liksom enligt frordningarna om systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur kan medlemsstaterna snka minimikravet fr kontroller p plats frn 10 % till 5 % nr den nationella databasen r fullt fungerande och nr man i ver ett r har kunnat gra effektiva dubbelkontroller i databasen inom ramen fr det integrerade administrations-och kontrollsystemet (3).
Health and Consumer Protection DG is in charge of the procedure for recognising the fully operational character of the national databases (see paragraphs 55 to 62) and is also responsible for monitoring the statistics of on-the-spot identification and registration checks which Member States are required to draw up (see paragraph 46). 
Generaldirektoratet fr hlsa och konsumentskydd har hand om frfarandet fr godknnande av att de nationella databaserna r fullt fungerande (se punkterna 55Đ62) och uppfljningen av den statistik som medlemsstaterna skall ta fram efter de kontroller p plats som grs inom systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur (se punkt 46).
At the beginning of 2002 the Food and Veterinary Office began a series of audit (1) Health and Consumer Protection DG has legislative responsibilities in the food, veterinary, phytosanitary and public health fields. 
I brjan av 2002 gjorde kontoret fr (1) Generaldirektoratet fr hlsa och konsumentskydd har ett rttsligt ansvar inom omrdena livsmedel, veterinra frgor, vxtskydd och folkhlsa.
Health and Consumer Protection DG is the result of the reorganisation of several units from three Directorates-General (DG III - Internal Market, DG VI - Agriculture and DG XXIV - Consumer Protection). 
Generaldirektoratet fr hlsa och konsumentskydd har bildats genom sammanslagning av flera avdelningar inom tre generaldirektorat (generaldirektorat III Đ inre marknaden, generaldirektorat VI Đ jordbruk och generaldirektorat XXIV Đ konsumentskydd).
(2) Article 21 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999. 
(2) Artikel 21 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 1254/1999.
(3) Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 2419/2001. visits to the Member States to evaluate the conduct of the checks on the traceability of beef and beef products. 
(3) Artikel 18 i kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 2419/2001. livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor en rad granskningsbesk i medlemsstaterna fr att utvrdera kontrollerna av mjligheten att spra ntktt och ntkttsprodukter.
In the course of these visits the entire chain is analysed, from fattening to point of sale. 
Vid dessa granskningsbesk analyseras hela kedjan frn uppfdning till detaljhandel.
The reports containing the observations and recommendations are subject to contradictory procedures between the Office and the Member States, and the final report is published on the CommissionŐs Internet site. 
Rapporterna om iakttagelser och rekommendationer gr igenom ett kontradiktoriskt frfarande med medlemsstaterna, och den slutliga rapporten lggs ut p kommissionens hemsida.
The Food and Veterinary Office visits the 15 Member States over a period of 12 months in connection with this work. 
Fr att gra detta besker kontoret fr livsmedels-och veterinrfrgor de femton medlemsstaterna under en tolvmnadersperiod.
In this context, it evaluates the reliability of the information in the cattle database, together with the procedures for exchanging information between national audit units following the on-the-spot checks carried out in the identification and registration context. 
Det utvrderar d tillfrlitligheten i informationen i databasen om ntkreatur och frfarandena fr informationsutbyte mellan nationella kontrollmyndigheter efter det att kontroller p plats har genomfrts inom ramen fr systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur.
The findings of DG Agriculture during its Ôclearance of accountsŐ visits may reveal problems affecting cross-checks of data taken from premium applications and data from the identification and registration database, delays in reporting movements, unsatisfactory keeping of herd books and shortcomings in the system for validating passports. 
De konstateranden som generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk gr vid sina besk vid avslutning av rkenskaperna kan visa p svrigheter att genomfra dubbelkontroller mellan uppgifter frn bidragsanskningar och upgifter i databaserna fr systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur, frseningar i anmlningarna om frflyttning, otillrckliga djurregister eller brister i systemet fr validering av pass.
Negligence in the organisation of identification checks may also be detected, such as an absence of checks on keepers other than those applying for premiums or failure to communicate the results of checks between the departments responsible for managing premiums and those in charge of identification. 
Det kan ocks komma fram att identifieringskontrollerna har organiserats p ett frsum-ligt stt och att det saknas kontroller av andra djurhllare n de som lmnar in bidragsanskningar eller att de enheter som frvaltar bidragen och de som har hand om identifieringen inte meddelar kontrollresultaten till varandra.
However, as there are no quantified quality indicators that are used by all those involved, they have no means of assessing whether the national databases are acceptable or not. 
Eftersom det inte finns ngra kvantifierade kvalitetsindikatorer som anvnds av alla parter har dessa emellertid inget verktyg fr att avgra hur vl de nationella databaserna fungerar.