natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Firstly, in some Member States some fishing activities were completely outside the catch declaration data collection system: (c) in Spain, France, Italy and the United Kingdom there were no systems for checking the serial numbers of declaration documents in order to ensure that the series was complete; (d) in Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom there were no systematic cross-checks on the consistency of VMS data (3) with the data in declaration documents; in four out of these five countries where it tested this aspect, the Court identified apparent anomalies for which the responsible authorities were unable to account satisfactorily. 
Fr det frsta undgick en del fiskeverksamheter helt insamlingen av deklarationsuppgifter om fngster i vissa medlemsstater: c) I Spanien, Frankrike, Italien och Frenade kungariket finns det inget system fr att kontrollera serienumren p deklarationshandlingarna och p s stt se till att de r kompletta. d) I Danmark, Frankrike, Italien, Nederlnderna och Frenade kungariket frekom inga systematiska dubbelkontroller av att VMS-uppgifterna (3) och uppgifterna i deklarationshandlingarna stmde verens med varandra.
Lastly, delays in the collection and validation of data may also adversely affect its completeness. 
Slutligen kan frseningar i insamlingen och valideringen av uppgifter ha en negativ effekt p uppgifternas fullstndighet.
This applies where catches are not validated before the final date for forwarding final figures for the previous year to the Commission. 
Det r fallet nr fngster inte valideras fre tidsfristen fr att lmna ver de slutliga uppgifterna fr det fregende ret till kommissionen.
Several anomalies of this type were discovered: (a) in the United Kingdom, the effect of corrections made after the final date of 15 February 2006 (4) was to reveal that 2005 quotas had been exceeded in the case of three stocks and to increase the overruns already recorded for three others; (b) in Italy, the department responsible for quota monitoring received eight additional declarations for bluefin tuna after the cut-off date for final figures; the declarations were submitted to it by a fisherman who was surprised when the authorities reduced his individual quota for the new year because the catch volume declared in 2005 had been low: when the additional quantities were taken into account, an overrun of the national quota appeared. 
Flera anomalier av den typen konstaterades: a) I Frenade kungariket visade det sig att korrigeringar som hade gjorts efter tidsfristen den 15 februari 2006 (4) ledde till att kvoten fr 2005 verskreds fr tre bestnd och till att de verskridningar som redan hade konstaterats fr tre andra bestnd kade. b) I Italien fick den avdelning som ansvarar fr vervakningen av kvoter tta kompletterande deklarationer fr tonfisk efter tidsfristen fr de slutliga siffrorna.
Validation checks limited in scope and not always effective None of the Member States visited were able to identify all the anomalies in declarations. 31. 
Giltighetskontrollerna har en begrnsad omfattning och r inte alltid effektiva Ingen beskt medlemsstat kunde identifiera samtliga anomalier i deklarationerna 31.
The Community Regulations (5) require Member States to establish a validation system that includes cross-checks and validation of the data obtained from the various obligatory declarations and VMS data. 
Enligt gemenskapsbestmmelserna (5) har medlemsstaterna en frpliktelse att infra ett system fr giltighetskontroll som ska omfatta dubbelkontroller och granskning av de uppgifter som kommit in till fljd av dessa olika frpliktelser att deklarera och ven granskning av VMS-uppgifter.
The Regulations also provide that each Member State is to create a database in order to facilitate these checks, but they specify neither the nature nor the scope of the validation checks to be carried out. 
Varje medlemsstat ska ocks upprtta en elektronisk databas fr att underltta denna granskning, men i bestmmelserna str det ingenting om arten eller omfattningen av de giltighetskontroller som ska utfras.
(3) System by which vessels transmit their positions to the inspecting authorities at regular intervals. 
(3) System genom vilket fartygen med jmna mellanrum anger sin position till kontrollmyndigheterna.
(4) Partly due to delays in recording and partly due to national inspectors finding undeclared landings. 
(4) Delvis p grund av frsenad registrering och delvis p grund av att nationella inspektrer upptckte odeklarerade landningar.
(5) Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93, Article 19. (a) (b) in Spain none of the catches by vessels under 10 metres in length were taken into account by quota monitoring, even though such vessels account for a substantial part of the national fleet (1); in France activities in the Mediterranean and the overseas departments (DOM) were not monitored in any way by the national statistics processing system. 
(5) Artikel 19 i frordning (EEG) nr 2847/93. a) b) I Spanien beaktades inte ngon av fngsterna p fartyg som r mindre n tio meter vid vervakningen av kvoter, trots att dessa fartyg str fr en betydande del av den nationella flottan (1).
28. collection of one or another of the three key declaration documents into their information systems, even though this has sometimes been obligatory for more than 20 years: (a) in France landing declarations have been required by the national authorities only since 2005 and were not always taken into account by the national catch data monitoring system in 2006; (b) in Italy and in Spain monitoring of quota uptake was based on one type of document only; (c) in Spain and in France the sales notes for frozen produce were not recorded, even though the quantities they represented were very substantial (2); (d) in the United Kingdom the recording of sales notes was only made obligatory in 2006. 
28. rat insamlingen av ngot av de tre viktigaste deklarationsdoku-menten i sitt IT-system, trots att detta ibland har varit obligatoriskt i mer n tjugo r: a) I Frankrike har de nationella myndigheterna inte krvt landningsdeklarationer frrn sedan 2005, och de beaktades inte alltid i det nationella systemet fr vervakning av fngstuppgifter 2006. b) I Italien och Spanien grs vervakningen av kvotutnyttjandet endast p grundval av en enda dokumenttyp. c) I Spanien och Frankrike registreras inte avrkningsnotor fr frysta varor trots att de motsvarar mycket stora kvantiteter (2). d) I Frenade kungariket blev registrering av avrkningsnotor inte obligatorisk frrn 2006.
Furthermore, the collection systems in place in the Member States did not always allow missing documents to be identified and requested: (a) in France, according to the department responsible for centralising catch data, no catch data were recorded for the year 2005 for 5 % of vessels over 10 metres in length; (b) in the United Kingdom there was no mechanism for verifying the completeness of sales notes submitted in respect of vessels under 10 metres, even though these documents are the only source of information for monitoring catches by this part of the fleet; (1) Vessels less than 10 metres in length account for 67 % of the fleet in terms of the number of ships and 11 % and 3 % respectively in terms of capacity expressed in kW and GT. 
Vidare r det inte alltid mjligt att identifiera och krva in de handlingar som saknas med hjlp av medlemsstaternas system: a) I Frankrike registrerades inte en enda uppgift om fngst fr r 2005 nr det gllde 5 % av fartyg som r lngre n 10 meter enligt den avdelning som ansvarar fr centraliseringen av fngstuppgifter. b) I Frenade kungariket finns det ingen mekanism som gr det mjligt att kontrollera om de avrkningsnotor som lmnas fr fartyg som r kortare n tio meter r fullstndiga trots att dessa notor r den enda kllan till information fr vervakningen av fngster av denna del av flottan.
(2) In Spain, according to the subdirectorate-general for marketing at the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 298 000 t in 2005; in France according to INSEE data they accounted for 40 % of the quantities landed in 2005. 
(2) 298 000 ton 2005 enligt ministeriet fr jordbruk, fiske och livsmedels undergeneraldirektorat fr salufring i Spanien; enligt uppgifter frn det nationella statistikkontoret (INSEE) i Frankrike motsvarar de 40 % av de landade kvantiteterna 2005.
Secondly, some Member States had not yet integrated 
Fr det andra har vissa medlemsstater nnu inte integre-
C 317/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 28.12.2007 32. 
C 317/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 28.12.2007 32.
No Member State had a fully integrated validation system, i.e. that allowed all declaration data of a similar type to be checked automatically and systematically: (a) in none of the Member States visited were there any automatic and systematic cross-checks between the data in the three main declaration documents and the corresponding VMS data; (b) in France landing declarations were not taken into account and the validation system consisted of supplementing incomplete (1) and sometimes irrelevant (2) sales data with estimated logbook figures; (c) in Italy the use of a single declaration document to monitor the only quota species made cross-checks of data impossible; moreover, the model in use in 2005, and still partly in use in 2006, did not comply with the Community Regulations; (d) in Denmark and Spain the landing declaration and sales note data were cross-checked only if there was a physical inspection. 
Ingen medlemsstat frfogade ver ett fullstndigt integrerat system fr giltighetskontroll, det vill sga som mjliggjorde en automatisk och systematisk kontroll av samtliga deklarationsuppgifter av samma typ: a) Inte i ngon av de medlemsstater som besktes gjordes ngra automatiska och systematiska dubbelkontroller av uppgifterna i de tre viktigaste deklarationshandlingarna eller av motsvarande VMS-uppgifter. b) I Frankrike beaktades inte landningsdeklarationerna och giltighetskontrollsystemet bestod i att komplettera ofullstndiga (1) och ibland irrelevanta (2) frsljningsuppgifter med uppskattade uppgifter i loggbckerna. c) I Italien gjorde anvndningen av en enda deklarationshand-ling fr vervakningen av den enda art fr vilken en kvot har faststllts att det inte gick att dubbelkontrollera uppgifterna. r 2005 och fortfarande delvis 2006 stmde inte den modell som anvndes verens med gemenskapsbestmmelserna. d) I Danmark och Spanien dubbelkontrollerades uppgifterna i landningsdeklarationerna och avrkningsnotorna endast vid en fysisk inspektion.
Moreover, in all the Member States visited, with the exception of the Netherlands, any figures obtained from counts carried out during physical inspections were not included in the system for validating catch declarations, even though they are, a priori, more reliable than those in the declarations. 
Dessutom frdes inte ngra av de siffror som samlats in vid fysiska inspektioner i giltighetskontrollsystemet fr fngstde-klarationer i ngon av de medlemsstater som besktes frutom Nederlnderna, trots att de i princip r mer tillfrlitliga n uppgifterna i deklarationerna.
Not all the anomalies identified by the Member States are the subject of appropriate follow-up 34. 
Alla anomalier som konstaterats av medlemsstaterna fljs inte upp p lmpligt stt 34.
In all the countries visited, cross-checks were insufficiently documented for it to be possible to verify whether they were actually carried out and whether anomalies identified had been the subject of appropriate follow-up. 
Dubbelkontrollerna dokumenterades inte p ett tillfredsstllande stt, vilket gr att det inte gr att kontrollera om de faktiskt har utfrts och om de anomalier som ptrffats har fljts upp p lmpligt stt, ngot som gller samtliga lnder som beskts.
In France the validation system is weakened by legal considerations. 
I Frankrike frsvagas giltighetskontrollsystemet av juridiska vervganden.
There is an ongoing debate within the national administration about the statistical nature (or otherwise) of declaration data. 
Det frekommer nmligen en diskussion inom den nationella administrationen om huruvida deklarationsuppgifterna r av statistisk karaktr eller inte.
Also, in the absence of legal certainty, inspectors are not systematically notified when deviations in excess of the tolerance margin are detected by the departments responsible for processing catch data. 
Eftersom det saknas juridisk skerhet meddelas inte inspektrerna systematiskt nr avvikelser som ligger ver toleransnivn upptcks av de avdelningar som ansvarar fr hanteringen av fngstuppgifter.
(1) Only auction sale figures taken into account, although a very substantial proportion of sales (more than 20 % of quantities landed) were not auction sales. 
(1) Endast uppgifterna frn frsljningen vid auktionerna togs med i berkningen trots att en mycket stor del av frsljningen (mer n 20 % av de landade kvantiteterna) genomfrdes utanfr auktionerna.
(2) The auction data include sales of produce landed in another Member State which must therefore be reported to the Commission by that Member State, and not by France. 
(2) Auktionsuppgifterna inbegriper frsljningar av produkter som landats i ngon annan medlemsstat och som drfr mste rapporteras till kommissionen av denna medlemsstat och inte av Frankrike.
Finally, in all the Member States visited, shortcomings in the validation systems made it possible for the Court to discover declaration anomalies (3) that had not been detected or dealt with. 
Slutligen har bristerna i giltighetskontrollsystemet gjort att revisionsrtten i samtliga medlemsstater som besktes identifierade anomalier i deklarationerna (3) som inte hade upptckts eller behandlats.
Lack of integration and harmonisation at Community level Very limited inter-operability between the systems of the different Member States adversely affects the completeness of controls. 37. 
Bristfllig integrering och harmonisering p gemenskapsniv Mycket begrnsad samverkan mellan systemen i de olika medlemsstaterna pverkar kontrollernas fullstndighet negativt 37.
The lack of inter-operability and inter-connection between the different national systems for collecting catch data reduces the opportunities for checking, and thus limits the extent of the validation systemsŐ effectiveness. 
Avsaknaden av samverkan och koppling mellan de olika nationella systemen fr insamling av fngstuppgifter minskar mjligheterna till kontroll och begrnsar sledes rckvidden fr giltighetskontrollsystemens effektivitet.
For example, in the case of first sale in a country other than the flag state or country of landing, it is not possible to perform an automatic control by cross-checking the sales note data, on the one hand, against the data in the logbook and the landing declaration on the other hand (4). 
Nr det till exempel gller en frsta frsljning i ett land som r ett annat n flaggstaten eller landningslandet gr det inte att utfra en automatisk dubbelkontroll av uppgifterna i avrkningsnotan  ena sidan och uppgifterna i loggboken och landningsdeklarationen  andra sidan (4).
National conversion factors imprecise and inconsistent 38. 
De nationella korrigeringskoefficienterna r oprecisa och inkonsekventa 38.
TAC and quotas are set in tonnes expressed as live-weight equivalent (LWE), i.e. whole fish at the time of catch. 
Totala tilltna fngstmngder (TAC) och kvoter faststlls i ton som uttrycks i motsvarande levande vikt, det vill sga hela fiskar vid fngsttillfllet.
On the other hand, in the declaration documents used as reference material for monitoring catches (5), it is the net weight that is used. 
Nr det dremot gller de deklarations-handlingar som tjnar som underlag fr vervakningen av fng-ster(5) anvnds nettovikten.
The difference between the two units is mainly due to the fish being cut up on board ship. 
Skillnaden mellan de tv viktenheterna beror huvudsakligen p att fisken styckas ombord p fartygen.
They are based on long established data (6) which were never rigorously validated, and often differed from one Member State to another. 
Dessa bygger p uppgifter som kommer frn tidigare praxis (6) och som aldrig validerats ordentligt och ofta skiljer sig frn en medlemsstat till en annan.
The result is lack of precision in validated catch figures and unjustified, and sometimes significant, differences between the tonnages used to monitor quotas, depending on whether landing took place in one country rather than another (7). 
Detta leder till oprecisa validerade fngstuppgifter och omotiverade och ibland betydande skillnader i de tonnage som anvnds vid vervakningen av kvoter beroende p i vilket land landningen gde rum (7).
(3) In particular, the existence of differences in excess of the tolerance laid down in the regulations between the quantities mentioned in the landing declarations and/or sales notes and those shown in the logbooks. 
(3) Framfr allt finns det avvikelser mellan de kvantiteter som uppges i landningsdeklarationer och/eller avrkningsnotor och uppgifterna i loggbckerna som ligger ver den toleransniv som faststllts i lagstiftningen.
(4) Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 provides that copies of the logbook and landing declaration are to be sent both to the authorities of the State where landing takes place and to the flag state, but the sales note is to be sent only to the competent authorities of the Member State in whose territory the first marketing takes place. 
(4) Enligt frordning (EEG) nr 2847/93 ska en kopia p loggboken och landningsdeklarationen verlmnas bde till myndigheterna i den stat dr landningen ger rum och till myndigheterna i flaggstaten medan avrkningsnotan endast ska lmnas in till de behriga myndigheterna i den medlemsstat p vars territorium den frsta salufringen sker.
(5) Landing declarations and sales notes. 
(5) Landningsdeklarationer och avrkningsnotor.
(6) Before the Community TAC and quota system was put in place. 
(6) Innan gemenskapssystemet med TAC och kvoter infrdes.
(7) 100 kg of gutted fresh cod will correspond to quota uptake of 124 kg if landed in France, and 111 kg in Lithuania; 100 kg of gutted/headed fresh anglerfish will correspond to a quota uptake of 250 kg if landed in Sweden and 325 kg in Germany. 28.12.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 317/11 Serious traceability problems 39. 
(7) 100 kg urtagen frsk torsk motsvarar ett kvotutnyttjande p 124 kg om landningen ger rum i Frankrike och p 111 kg om den sker i Litauen; 100 kg urtagen/huvudls frsk marulk motsvarar en kvotutnyttjande p 250 kg om landningen ger rum i Sverige och p 325 kg i Tyskland. 28.12.2007 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 317/11 Allvarliga problem med sprbarhet i tv av de beskta lnderna 39.
The traceability of data was not assured in two of the countries visited, that is to say, it was not possible to verify whether the consolidated data forwarded to the Commission actually corresponded to the sum of the individual validated data. 
Uppgifternas sprbarhet kunde inte garanteras i tv av de lnder som besktes, det vill sga det gick inte att verifiera huruvida de aggregerade uppgifter som lmnats till kommissionen verkligen motsvarade summan av de individuella uppgifter som hade validerats.
This is a major anomaly, since it is not possible to make the link Total on detailed statement provided to auditors Data forwarded to DG FISH Difference (in tonnes) Difference % between the data used for quota monitoring and the data appearing in individual declarations: Table 1 (a) in France, for the six species analysed, the totals in the detailed statement drawn up by the national authorities showed significant differences from the final figures forwarded to the Commission (see Table 1); the French authorities provided explanations for the possible origin of these differences, but were not able to provide a reconciliation; ANF BFT COD (cod) 5 537,7 6 528,9 Đ 991,2 Đ 15,2 % HKE (hake) 13 167,4 7 425,1 5 742,3 77,3 % SRX (skate) 56,9 48,5 8,4 17,3 % WHG (whiting) 13 391,4 12 914,4 477,0 3,7 % (anglerfish) (bluefin tuna) Species (tonnes) 19 910,5 1 683,1 15 981,9 1 864,4 3 928,6 Đ 181,3 (b) in Spain, for 2005, the data declared to the Directorate-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs (DG Fish) for landings by Spanish ships in Spain are approximately 40 % (1) less than the data recorded in the national databases; the Spanish authorities have acknowledged the omissions in declarations to DG Fish as around 148,5 thousand tonnes relating to species not subject to quota, and were unable to provide explanations for the other 20,5 thousand tonnesto make up the difference; (c) in Italy, a document drawn up by central departments recorded landings of 97,5 tonnes of bluefin tuna in 2005 in the Salerno district. 
Detta r en betydande anomali eftersom det inte gr att gra en koppling mellan de uppgifter som anvnds vid vervakningen av kvoter och uppgifterna i de enskilda deklarationerna: Tabell 1 BFT (tonfisk) 1 683,1 1 864,4 Đ 181,3 Đ 9,7 % Arter (ton) a) Fr de sex arter som analyserades i Frankrike uppvisade totalsummorna i den detaljerade redovisning som de nationella myndigheterna hade upprttat stora skillnader jmfrt med de slutliga siffror som lmnades till kommissionen (se tabell 1).
Of the seven catch declarations that provided evidence of the quantities landed, two showed a port in another region. 
Av de sju fngstdeklaratio-ner som intygade de landade kvantiteterna var det tv som angav hamnen i en annan region.
Analysis of VMS signals did not provide any information about the exact location of the vessels in question on the landing date shown (2). 
Trots att analyser gjordes av VMS-signalerna kunde man inte exakt lokalisera de aktuella fartygen den dag d landningen skulle ha skett (2).
(1) 262,9 thousand tonnes against 431,9 thousand tonnes, a difference of 169,0 thousand tonnes. 
(1) 262,9 mot 431,9 tusen ton eller en skillnad p 169,0 tusen ton.
(2) In fact, two of the vessels were not equipped with this system, and in the case of the five others no signal was received on the day of the landing (in one case the vessel had not emitted any signals for more than three years before the landing date shown, and in another case for more than two years). 
(2) Tv av fartygen var inte utrustade med detta system, och fr de fem andra hade ingen signal tagits emot p landningsdagen (i ett fall hade ett fartyg inte lngre snt ngon signal sedan mer n tre r fre det datum som angetts fr landningen och i ett annat fall sedan mer n tv r).
40. None of the Member States visited had carried out a comprehensive audit of the catch data collection and validation systems to evaluate the quality of the IT applications. 
Inte ngon av de medlemsstater som besktes har underkastat sitt system fr insamling och validering av fngstuppgifter en vergripande revision fr att utvrdera kvaliteten p dataapp-likationerna.
Similarly, the data produced by the systems and forwarded to the Commission had never been subject to a procedure involving certification by an independent body. 
Inte heller hade de uppgifter som vidarebefordras frn dessa system och verlmnas till kommissionen ngonsin blivit freml fr ett certifieringsfrfarande av ett oberoende organ.
In the original version of the Regulation on control (3), however, it was stipulated that in the year following the entry into force of the Regulation, each Member State was to submit to the Commission a report describing the way in which data are collected and verified, and specifying the reliability of such data. 
I den ursprungliga versionen av frordningen om kontrollsystem (3) freskrivs dock att varje medlemsstat skulle lmna in en rapport till kommissionen, inom tolv mnader efter det att frordningen hade trtt i kraft, i vilken det beskrivs hur uppgifterna samlas in och kontrolleras och hur tillfrlitliga de r.
This obligation was not retained in later versions of the text (4). 
Denna skyldighet finns inte kvar i senare textversioner (4).
(3) Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93, Article 19(5). 
(3) Artikel 19.5 i frordning (EEG) nr 2847/93.
(4) Regulation (EC) No 2846/98, Article 1(13)(c). 
(4) Artikel 1.13 c i frordning (EG) nr 2846/98.