natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, considerable delays were noted in the processing of the reports. 
Dessutom hade det uppsttt stora frseningar i behandlingen av anmlningarna.
In 2000 and 2001, for more than 95 % of reports of all types, the time taken to record them in the database was in excess of the time allowed by the legislation. 
Under 2000 och 2001 verskred ver 95 % av alla typer av anmlningar som registrerades i databasen den lagstiftade tidsramen.
The mechanisms for detecting anomalies in movements and the administration of the anomalies differed quite significantly in the Member States visited (see box 11). 
Hur frflyttningsanomalier upptcktes och hur dessa anomalier frvaltades skilde sig mycket t mellan de medlemsstater som besktes (se ruta 11).
Box 11 In Germany a series of 600 a priori tests of control was implemented to ensure optimum quality of the data entered in the base. Further a posteriori tests were also carried out. 
Ruta 11 I Tyskland hade man genomfrt 600 frhandsgranskningar fr att frskra sig om att de uppgifter som frdes in i databasen var av bsta mjliga kvalitet. ven andra efterhandsgranskningar hade gjorts.
In addition, the German authorities developed a quality indicator for the data in the base. 
Dessutom hade de tyska myndigheterna infrt en kvalitetsindikator fr uppgifterna i databasen.
This indicator gave the percentage of animals with anomalies in relation to total movements. 
Denna indikator angav procenttalet fr djur med anomalier i frhllande till de totala frflyttningarna.
In Italy, of the entry reports made in 2001, 515 967 reports did not state the origin of the movement (21 % of the total). 
I 515 967 fall av de anmlningar om infrsel som gjordes 2001 i Italien nmndes inte varifrn djuret kom (21 % av det totala antalet).
On 1 January 2002, 2 305 076 exits of animals had been reported with no indication of their destination. 
Den 1 januari 2002 hade 2 305 076 djur anmlts som utfrda utan att destinationen hade uppgivits.
In March 2002 the national database contained 743 079 duplicate ear tag marks. 
I mars 2002 innehll den nationella databasen 743 079 dubbletter av ronmrken.
Delays in reporting movements were noted in Great Britain. 
Frsenade anmlningar av frflyttningar hade registrerats i Storbritannien.
Some exit reports were not followed by entry reports, which meant that the animals concerned were ÔlostŐ. 
Ett antal utfrslar hade inte fljts av ngon infrsel, vilket betydde att djuren i frga hade Ótappats bortÓ.
In addition, some anomalies had been corrected by means of an automatic procedure which generated the missing movement (1 915 000 ÔcorrectiveŐ movements counted in April 2002). 
Dessutom hade vissa anomalier rttats till automatiskt s att man skapat den frflyttning som saknades (1 915 000 ÓrttadeÓ frflyttningar i april 2002).
In France assembly centres and traders were not obliged to report movements unless the animals remained with them for more than 30 days. 
I Frankrike behvde uppsamlingsstllena och handlarna bara anmla frflyttningar om ntkreaturen hlls dr i mer n 30 dagar. Slakterierna behvde inte meddela frflyttningar.
In France and Italy the local bases were not synchronised with the national databases. 
I Frankrike och Italien var de lokala databaserna inte synkroniserade med den nationella databasen.
In France, the national base was supplied with data from 43 local bases. 
I Frankrike hmtades uppgifterna i den nationella databasen frn 43 lokala databaser.
For 75 % of the farms visited, quantitative and qualitative differences were found between the data available in the national base and the data in the local base. 
Skillnader i kvantitet och kvalitet konstaterades mellan uppgifterna i den nationella databasen och i den lokala databasen fr 75 % av de anlggningar som besktes.
In Italy some of the 198 local databases had no direct access to the national database. 
I Italien hade inte alla de 198 lokala databaserna direkt tillgng till den nationella databasen.
In addition, the slaughterhouses were not connected to the national database. 
Dessutom var slakterierna inte knutna till den nationella databasen.
Differences between the data from the various databases were found for all the farms visited. 
Skillnader mellan uppgifter som kommer frn de olika databaserna noterades i alla de anlggningar som besktes.
The quality of the information contained in the databases was considered adequate in Germany but inadequate in the three other Member States. 
Kvaliteten p informationen i databaserna bedmdes vara tillrcklig i Tyskland, men otillrcklig i de tre andra medlemsstaterna.
Few quality indicators had been developed for the data contained in the base and external sources were not used to validate the quality of the data. 
F kvalitetsindikatorer gllande uppgifterna i databasen hade utvecklats, och externa kllor hade inte anvnts fr att bekrfta uppgifternas kvalitet.
Reports by the various keepers 87. 
De olika djurhllarnas anmlningar 87.
With regard to reports, the level of participation by the various keepers was considered to be satisfactory in the case of the farmers. 
Betrffande anmlningarna bedmdes de olika djurhllarna delta i tillrckligt stor utstrckning fr uppfdarna.
Nevertheless, traceability is not complete if all keepers, even temporary ones such as traders, wholesalers and managers of assembly centres, do not report entries and exits. 
Det r dock inte mjligt att fullstndigt spra djur om inte alla djurhllare, ven tillflliga ssom handlare, grossister och frvaltare av uppsamlingsstllen, anmler infrsel och utfrsel av djur.
In France, slaughterhouses were not an integral part of the system. 
I Frankrike ingick inte slakterierna i systemet.
Information on cattle flows 89. 
Information om frflyttningar av ntkreatur 89.
The database of France, which is responsible for more than 50 % of intra-Community exports, provided no information on movements involving the other Member States. 
I databasen i Frankrike, som stod fr ver 50 % av exporten inom gemenskaperna, fanns det ingen information om frflyttningar till och frn andra medlemsstater.
In the case of the latter, the information from the computerised databases relating to intra-Community movements shows substantial divergence between the exits declared by the Member State of consignment and the entries declared by the Member State of destination (see table 7). 
Informationen om frflyttningar inom gemenskapen i de andra medlemsstaternas databaser skiljer sig t betydligt nr det gller de utfrslar som uppgivits av den medlemsstat som djuret kom frn och de infrs-lar som uppgivits av den medlemsstat som djuret frdes till (se tabell 7).
Box 12 gives some examples of the anomalies and inconsistencies found between national databases. 
I ruta 12 beskrivs exempel p anomalier och inkonsekvenser som konstaterats i jmfrelsen mellan de nationella databaserna.
82 C 29/28 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 Box 12 The Italian database only reported 22 687 animals from Germany for 2001, whereas the German database recorded 114 820 exited to Italy. 
C 29/28 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 4.2.2005 Ruta 12 I den italienska databasen uppgavs fr 2001 att endast 22 687 djur hade kommit frn Tyskland, medan det i den tyska databasen uppgavs att 114 820 djur hade frts ut med destination Italien.
For 2000, the data are 18 255 and 79 691 respectively. 
Fr r 2000 r uppgifterna 18 255 respektive 79 691.
In addition, the Italian database did not report a single exit towards Germany, whereas entries from Italy were recorded in the German database (1 126 animals in 2000 and 73 animals in 2001). 
Dessutom finns det i den italienska databasen inga uppgifter om att djur har frts ut med destination Tyskland, medan det i den tyska databasen har registrerats att djur har frts in frn Italien (1 126 ntkreatur r 2000 och 73 ntkreatur r 2001).
The German database recorded exits of only 23 animals to the United Kingdom in 2000, whereas the United Kingdom databases showed 52. In 2001, the German database recorded 163 animals exiting for the United Kingdom, while the United Kingdom databases recorded 1 122. 
I den tyska databasen uppgavs att endast 23 djur hade frts ut till Frenade kungariket r 2000, medan databaserna i Frenade kungariket uppgav 52. r 2001 fanns det i den tyska databasen uppgifter om att 163 djur hade frts ut till Frenade kungariket, medan databaserna i Frenade kungariket uppgav 1 122.
While the United Kingdom databases reported no exits in 2000 or 2001, the Italian database included 160 entries of cattle in 2000 and 82 cattle in 2001, although these movements were actually forbidden. 
Ingen utfrsel hade registrerats i databaserna i Frenade kungariket, medan den italienska databasen innehll uppgifter om att 160 ntkreatur hade frts in 2000 och 82 ntkreatur 2001, ven om sdana frflyttningar normalt sett var frbjudna.
There were other inconsistencies in respect of exits from Italy for the United Kingdom. 160 animals were declared as exiting Italy for the United Kingdom in 2000, whereas the United Kingdom databases only mention 5. For 2001 the situation is reversed, as the Italian database contained no exit to the United Kingdom, whereas 37 entries were recorded there. 
Andra inkonsekvenser kan ppekas nr det gller antal djur som frts ut frn Italien till Frenade kungariket. Det hade anmlts att 160 djur hade frts ut frn Italien till Frenade kungariket 2000, medan det i databaserna i Frenade kungariket endast fanns uppgifter om 5 djur. r 2001 var situationen den motsatta eftersom de italienska databaserna inte innehll ngon uppgift om att djur frts ut till Frenade kungariket, medan det hade registrerats att 37 djur hade frts in.
90. Trade with third countries in 2000 and 2001 also showed substantial differences (see table 8) between Eurostat data and the data in the national databases. 
90. ven nr det gller handeln med tredjelnder 2000 och 2001 finns det stora skillnader (se tabell 8) mellan Eurostats uppgifter och uppgifterna i de nationella databaserna.
According to the inquiries carried out by the Court, there is no consistency between the data from the two data sources. 
Enligt de underskningar som revisionsrtten har gjort finns det ingen samstmmighet mellan uppgifterna frn de tv uppgiftskllorna.
It was not possible to obtain a true view of the movements of animals between the Member States and third countries. 
Det har inte varit mjligt att f en trogen bild av frflyttningar av djur mellan medlemsstaterna och tredjelnder.
IMPORTS FOR 2000 According to Eurostat According to the national databases Difference Germany 118 780 33 583 85 197 France Italy 25 330 632 n.a. 170 184 n.a. 160 448 n.a. 
IMPORT R 2000 Enligt Eurostat Enligt de nationella databaserna Skillnad Tyskland 118 780 33 583 85 197 Frankrike 25 ej tillgnglig ej tillgnglig ej tillgnglig Italien 330 632 170 184 160 448 94 % Frenade kungariket 432 1 127 - 695 - 62 % Tabell 8 Jmfrelse av uppgifter om import frn tredjelnder % 254% ej tillgnglig: uppgifterna ej tillgngliga.
IMPORTS FOR 2001 According to Eurostat According to the national databases Difference % 245 n.a.: data not available Source: Eurostat and national databases. 
Klla: Eurostat och nationella databaser. IMPORT R 2001 Enligt Eurostat Enligt de nationella databaserna Skillnad % 245% ej tillgnglig: uppgifterna ej tillgngliga.
France Germany 74 730 21 637 53 093 n.a. 142 
Frankrike 8 ej tillgnglig ej tillgnglig ej tillgnglig Italien 310 739 128 515 182 224 142 % Frenade kungariket 65 - 16 - 25 % Tyskland 74 730 49 21 637 53 093
4.2.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 29/29 On-the-spot checks 91. 
4.2.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 29/29 Kontroller p plats 91.
The on-the-spot checks carried out by the Member States (see table 6) were evaluated as follows. 
De kontroller p plats som genomfrts av medlemsstaterna (se tabell 6) har utvrderats enligt vad som beskrivs nedan.
In Germany, the on-the-spot checks were organised at Lnder level. 
I Tyskland hade kontrollerna p plats organiserats p delstatsniv.
In Bavaria, the minimum checking rate of 10 % was not respected, the method of selecting the beneficiaries to be audited was not based on an annual risk analysis, the legal penalties were not applied and the results of on-the-spot checks were not systematically forwarded to the premium administrators. 
I Bayern hade man inte respekterat miniminivn p 10 % fr kontrollerna, det gjordes ingen rlig riskanalys av metoden man anvnde fr att vlja ut de bidragsmottagare som skulle kontrolleras, de lagstiftade pfljderna utdmdes inte och resultaten av kontrollerna p plats verlmnades inte systematiskt till bidragsfrvaltarna.
France and Great Britain did not comply with the minimum rate of 10 % for on-the-spot checks. 
I Frankrike och Storbritannien respekterades inte miniminivn 10 % fr kontroller p plats.
In Italy, the quality of the checks, the recording of the results of those checks, the application of penalties and the forwarding of the results to the premium managers all raised doubts about the reliability of the on-the-spot checks. 
I Italien ifrgasattes tillfrlitligheten hos kontrollerna p plats av kvaliteten p kontrollerna, utformningen av kontrollresultaten, utdmandet av pfljder och verlmnandet av resultaten till bidragsfrvaltarna.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 92. 
SLUTSATS OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 92.
Considering that the objective of the legislation on cattle identification and registration is to ensure the traceability of all cattle movements on the territory of the European Union, the regulatory framework put in place has some conceptual shortcomings (paragraphs 33 to 46). 
Om man anser att mlet med lagstiftningen om identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur r att gra det mjligt att spra all frflyttning av ntkreatur inom gemenskapens territorium r de frordningar som infrts bristflligt utformade(se punkterna 33Đ46).
For example, Community legislation makes no provision for procedures to monitor movements of cattle between Member States, although between 3 and 4 % of cattle change Member State every year. 
Det finns allts inte i gemenskapslagstiftningen ngot faststllt frfarande fr att det skall g att flja frflyttningar av ntkreatur mellan medlemsstater trots att mellan 3 % och 4 % av ntkreaturen flyttas mellan medlemsstaterna varje r.
The databases developed in the Member States are very heterogeneous, which is a barrier to interconnection of the databases (paragraphs 40 and 41). 
De databaser som utvecklats i medlemsstaterna r mycket olika, vilket frsvrar samkrning av dem (punkterna 40 och 41).
Ń If the objective is to facilitate reliable interoperability between national databases, the Commission should be authorised to adopt common rules allowing interconnection of the Member StatesŐ databases (paragraphs 40 and 41). 
Ń Om mlet r att man skall kunna lita p att de nationella databaserna r kompatibla br kommissionen ha befogenhet att faststlla gemensamma bestmmelser s att medlemsstaternas databaser blir kompatibla (se punkterna 40 och 41).
Every Member State has adopted its own administrative rules for the cattle identification and registration system. 
Varje medlemsstat har faststllt sina egna bestmmelser fr hur systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur skall frvaltas.
Few quality indicators have been developed (paragraphs 86 to 90). 
Det har utvecklats f kvalitetsindikatorer (punkterna 86Đ90).
Ń The Commission should be empowered to draw up, within the framework of existing or amended procedures, precise criteria for operation of the national databases (common administrative rules, quality indicators, definition of a format for the exchange of data between national databases, etc.) (paragraphs 86 to 90). 
Ń Kommissionen br ha befogenhet att, med befintliga eller ndrade frfaranden, faststlla tydliga kriterier fr hur de nationella databaserna skall fungera (gemensamma frvaltningsbestmmelser, kvalitetsindikatorer, faststllande av ett format fr informationsutbyte mellan nationella databaser osv.) (punkterna 86Đ90).
The legislation stipulates, without laying down rules on the procedures, that the Commission is to assess whether the databases are fully operational. 
I lagstiftningen faststlls att, men inte hur, kommissionen skall bedma om databaserna r fullt fungerande.
The aim of this recognition is to authorise Member States to abolish passports for movements of cattle on the national territory of a Member State and to reduce the rate of checks for animal premiums from 10 to 5 %. 
I och med detta godknnande av databaserna ges medlemsstaterna tillstnd att slopa pass fr djur som frflyttas inom en medlemsstats nationella territorium och att minska andelen djurbidragskontroller frn 10 % till 5 %.
This justification reduces the impact of recognition that databases are operational (paragraphs 55 to 64). 
Detta begrnsar betydelsen av godknnandet av databaserna som fullt fungerande (punkterna 55Đ64).
Ń If the aim is to have databases which are operational, the procedure for recognising databases should be strengthened by redefining the objective and detailing the criteria that must be met, in respect of both design and operation, in order for the Commission to award recognition and renew it periodically (paragraphs 55 to 65). 
Ń Om mlet r att ha fungerande databaser br man frstrka frfarandet fr godknnande av databaserna genom att omdefiniera syftet med det och frtydliga de kriterier som mste fljas svl nr det gller hur det skall vara utformat som hur det skall fungera s att kommissionen kan bemyndigas att gra detta godknnande och att regelbundet frnya det (punkterna 55Đ65).
The Commission should therefore take on a guiding role in the system of cattle identification and registration (paragraphs 38 to 40 and 47) and carry out regular checks to ensure that the databases are fully operational (paragraphs 55 to 59, 65 to 69 and paragraph 71) by setting up a coherent procedure for verifying the operation of the system in the Member States, including annual certification of the quality of information in the national databases (paragraphs 37 and 69). 
Kommissionen br allts styra systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur (punkterna 38Đ40 och 47) och regelbundet kontrollera att databaserna r fullt fungerande (punkterna 55Đ59, 65Đ69 och 71) genom att infra ett enhetligt frfarande fr kontroll av hur systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur fungerar i medlemsstaterna med en rlig kvalitetsskring av informationen i de nationella databaserna (punkterna 37 och 69).
Ń The legislative framework should make provision for systematic exchanges of information between databases in the Member States so that intra-Community movements of cattle can be traced in accordance with the requirements of the Community legislation (paragraphs 35 to 37). 
Ń Regelverket br innehlla bestmmelser om hur ett systematiskt informationsutbyte mellan databaserna i medlemsstaterna skall organiseras s att det blir mjligt att spra frflyttningar av ntkreatur inom gemenskapen i enlighet med behoven i gemenskapslagstiftningen (punkterna 35Đ37).
The current legislation has inconsistencies and impreci-93. sions, which give rise to differences in treatment among Member States (paragraph 38). 
De gllande bestmmelserna r i viss mn oklara eller 93. inkonsekventa och innebr att medlemsstaterna kan handla olika (punkt 38).
In addition, the existence of options in the application of the legislation complicates the system (paragraph 39). 
Dessutom kompliceras systemet genom att det finns valmjligheter nr det gller tillmpningen av frordningarna (punkt 39).
Ń All keepers of cattle should be included in the identification and registration system (see paragraph 32). 
Ń Alla djurhllare br integreras i systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur (se punkt 32).
The reports should be subject to precise rules which are identical in all Member States. 
Det br finnas tydliga och identiska bestmmelser fr anmlningar i alla medlemsstater.
The keeping of registers should be adapted to the activities of the various keepers and take into account technological developments (machine-readable bar codes, Internet, etc.). 
Registren br anpassas till de olika djurhllarnas verksamheter och flja med i den tekniska utvecklingen (optisk lsning av streckkoder, Internet osv.).
Procedures for checking and returning passports to the issuing body should be implemented. 
Det br infras frfaranden fr kontroll och tersndande av pass till den utfrdande myndigheten.
In addition, identification numbers should be rendered more compatible (paragraphs 38 and 39). 
Dessutom br identifieringsnumren vara mer kompatibla (punkterna 38 och 39).
C 29/30 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.2.2005 97. 
C 29/30 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 4.2.2005 97.
The on-the-spot checks to be carried out by Member States are not appropriate for all types of keepers of cattle. 
De kontroller p plats som medlemsstaterna skall gra r inte anpassade till alla slags djurhllare.
In the case of farmers, the ÔidentificationŐ checks and the IACS checks have not been systematically integrated. 
Fr uppfdarna r inte kontrollerna av identifiering och IACS-kontrollerna systematiskt integrerade.
In the absence of precise harmonised rules for all the Member States (paragraphs 72 to 74), anomalies in identification have different financial consequences in terms of the premiums paid in the various Member States. 
Eftersom det inte finns ngra tydliga och harmoniserade bestmmelser fr alla medlemsstater (punkterna 72Đ74) har identifieringsanomalierna olika ekonomiska konsekvenser fr bidragen som betalas ut i de olika medlemsstaterna.
Ń A comparative analysis of the administrative checks in force in the different Member States should result in controls being defined which cover all the conditions governing eligibility for premiums, as well as the cross-checks to be made between the IACS databases and the identification and registration databases before premiums are paid (paragraphs 72 to 74). 
Ń En jmfrande analys av de befintliga administrativa kontrollerna i de olika medlemsstaterna br leda till att man faststller kontroller som tcker samtliga villkor fr bidragsberttigande och dubbelkontroller mellan databasen fr systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur och databasen fr IACS innan bidragen betalas ut (punkterna 72Đ74).
In addition, the system of on-the-spot checks should be reviewed (including the penalty mechanisms), approaches which are specific to the type of keeper should be laid down and, especially in the case of farmers, an approach which is fully integrated with IACS should be imposed, while purely welfare matters should be covered by veterinary legislation (paragraphs 43 to 46 and paragraph 71). 
Dessutom br man se ver de gllande bestmmelserna fr kontroll p plats (inbegripet tillmpandet av pfljder), definiera srskilda frfaranden fr de olika typerna av djurhllare och, fr uppfdarna, infra ett frfarande som r fullstndigt integrerat i IACS, medan de frgor som endast r av hlsokaraktr br tckas av den veterinra lagstiftningen (punkterna 43Đ46 och 71).
The legislative arrangements in force in the United Kingdom do not require animals to be identified and registered in accordance with the identification and registration regulation in order to be eligible for payments granted in the case of slaughter and destruction of cattle which are over 30 months old. 
I de bestmmelser som gller i Frenade kungariket freskrivs inte att djuren skall identifieras och registreras i enlighet med frordningen om systemet fr identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur fr att vara berttigade till de utbetalningar som grs vid slakt och destruering av ntkreatur som r ldre n 30 mnader.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 7 and 8 July 2004. 
Denna rapport har antagits av revisionsrtten vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 7 och 8 juli 2004.