natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission did not carry out any tests that could provide global quality assurance, for example examining Member StatesŐ statistical organisation, the conditions under which the basic data were produced, the compatibility of the various data sources used, the balancing procedures and the methods used to establish the level of assurance. 
Kommissionen har inte gjort ngon analys som kan ge en vergripande kvalitetsgaranti genom att underska exempelvis medlemsstaternas statistikorganisation, omstndigheterna vid framstllningen av grundlggande uppgifter, samstmmighet mellan de olika kllor som anvnts, frfaranden fr sammanstllning och metoder fr att faststlla tillfrlitlighetstrsklar.
Moreover, the Commission judges the accuracy of the data, not on the basis of a strict application of the concepts or exhaustive practical measurement, but on whether a procedure is unaffected by substantial errors. 
Med uppgifternas riktighet menar kommissionen dessutom inte en strikt tillmpning av begreppen eller ett heltckande praktiskt mtt, utan ett frfarande som inte innehller vsentliga fel.
The Court is aware that in the very nature of GNP the quality of the estimates is also subject to cost-benefit considerations. 
Revisionsrtten r medveten om att berkningarnas kvalitet, med tanke p sjlva karaktren av BNI, dessutom pverkar kostnads-nyttofrhllandet.
However, the reply that was given in several cases merely described the problems raised as negligible, without providing any information that could be used to assess the reasons underlying this opinion. 
I flera fall anges emellertid i det svar som ges endast att de problem som tas upp r frsumbara, utan ytterligare information som skulle gra det mjligt att bedma orsakerna bakom denna bedmning.
There are also grounds for wondering how the Commission, in certain cases, arrived at the view that the effects of several types of non-compliant treatment cancel each other out and therefore have no impact on the GNP calculation, or, even, that the use of different definitions by the statistical offices produces congruent and comparable results. 
Man kan ocks frga sig hur kommissionen i vissa fall kommer fram till att effekterna av flera felaktiga bearbetningar tar ut varandra och drmed inte fr ngra konsekvenser fr berkningen av BNI, eller till och med att statistikkontorens anvndning av olika definitioner leder till resultat som r jmfrbara och i verensstmmelse med ENS.
THE ROLE OF THE GNP COMMITTEE 60. 
BNI-KOMMITTNS ROLL 60.
The GNP Committee delivers an annual opinion on the basis of information supplied by the Member States and the Commission. 
BNI-kommittn avger ett rligt yttrande p grundval av de uppgifter som medlemsstaterna och kommissionen lmnat in.
Every year since 1990 the GNP Committee has asserted in this document that Ôconsiderable improvements have been madeŐ and Ônotes with satisfaction the progress made and being made in the Member States in harmonising GNP dataŐ. 
Varje r sedan 1990 har BNI-kommittn i detta dokument konstaterat att betydande frbttringar har genomfrts, och med till-fredsstllelsekonstateratdeframstegsomgjortsochsompgri medlemsstaterna vad gller harmonisering av BNI-uppgifterna.
As regards compliance with quality concepts such as those mentioned in paragraph 18, the CommitteeŐs opinion offers no benchmark against which the levels achieved in each Member State and the progress yet to be made may be registered. 
Betrffande tillmpningen av de kvalitetsbegrepp, som de som nmns i punkt 18, innehller inte kommittns yttrande ngon referenspunkt utifrn vilken man kan bedma den niv som upp-nttsivarjemedlemsstatsamtdeframstegsomterstrattgras.
61. In 1992, in its report on the application of Directive 89/130/ EEC, Euratom, the Commission asserted that as far as examination of the data was concerned, the Committee had confined itself to establishing their availability. 
61. r 1992 konstaterade kommissionen i sin rapport om tilllmpningen av direktiv 89/130/EEG, Euratom att nr det gller granskning av uppgifter hade kommittn begrnsat sig till att konstatera att de fanns tillgngliga.
The results of the analysis of the detailed inventories and the findings that might result were unavailable. 
Resultatet frn analysen av de detaljerade frteckningarna och de iakttagelser som den skulle kunna ge upphov till fanns inte tillgngliga.
This argument is no longer valid today. 
Detta argument r inte lngre aktuellt.
The Committee, comprising experts in this field, is supplied with information by its members, on the one hand, and obtains data from the CommissionŐs analyses, on the other. 
Kommittn, som r sammansatt av experter p omrdet, erhller information dels frn sina medlemmar, dels frn kommissionens analyser.
In principle, it has all the information it needs to form an overall opinion concerning the comparability and reliability of the data. 
Den frfogar i princip ver all information den behver fr att kunna lmna ett vergripande omdme om uppgifternas jmfrbarhet och tillfrlitlighet.
3 ( ) See, for example, the figure illustrating paragraph 18. 
3 ( ) Se t.ex. den bild som terfinns under punkt 18.
C 336/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27.11.2000 The possibility of measuring the quality of the data 63. 
C 336/10 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 27.11.2000 Mjligheten att mta uppgifternas kvalitet 63.
The production of the national accounts may be divided into three main stages. 
Upprttandet av nationalrkenskaper kan delas in i tre stora etapper.
The first uses a complex information system, made up of sources which are purely statistical, fiscal, administrative, exhaustive or the result of sampling and which make it possible to approach GDP, and then GNP, from three angles (demand, output and income) (1) as well. 
Under den frsta etappen behvs ett komplext informationssystem, som bestr av kllor som r rent statistiska, skat-terelaterade, administrativa, fullstndiga eller resultatet av stick-provsunderskningar, som innebr att man kan nrma sig BNP Đ och drmed BNI Đ frn hgst tre mtperspektiv (efterfrgan, produktion, inkomster) (1).
During this phase every source, and its processing, gives rise to errors. 
Under denna etapp ger varje klla och bearbetning av kllan upphov till fel.
Quality measurement involves modelling the error of each of the basic components and then deriving from it an indicator of the quality of the overall aggregate. 
Kvalitetsmtningen innebr att man skapar en modell av felet i var och en av de grundlg-gandekomponenternavarigenommanfrenindikationpdet totala aggregatets kvalitet.
At the second stage information obtained on the basis of different approaches or independent sources is compared and balanced. 
Under den andra etappen jmfrs och sammanstlls den information som erhllits genom olika mtperspektiv eller frn oberoende kllor.
Comparative differences are another indicator of quality, in addition to those mentioned above (comparisons based on the various approaches). 
Skillnader vid jmfrelsen utgr en annan kva-litetsindikator, som skall lggas till de ovannmnda (jmfrelse mellan olika mtperspektiv).
Lastly, as information gradually becomes available, the economic aggregates produced undergo some revision. 
Slutligen revideras framstllningen av ekonomiska aggregat, eftersom information fortlpande blir tillgnglig.
The final stage of the quality measurement approach is to study the profiles of the revisions, more specifically to measure any bias in the early version by reference to the final version (analysis of changes in the revisions). 
Det sista tillvgagngssttet fr kvalitetsmtning bestr i en underskning av revideringsprofiler, nrmare bestmt i en mtning av den systematiska avvikelsen i den frsta versionen i frhllande till den slutliga versionen (analys av frndringar i samband med revide-ringarna).
Given the heterogeneous nature of the systems for producing GNP figures, it is essential that the level reached by each Member State is evaluated and compared with a quality concept such as that described in paragraph 18. 
Medhnsyntillskillnadernaisystemenfrframstllningav BNI-uppgifterna r det srskilt viktigt att utvrdera och jmfra vilken niv varje medlemsstat har uppntt i frhllande till ett kvalitetsbegrepp, som det som beskrivs i punkt 18.
In the past (2) the Court has recommended the introduction of a means of measuring the comparability (on the basis of indicators) and the reliability (by means of confidence intervals) of GNP data. 
Revisionsrtten har tidigare (2) fresprkat infrandet av ett mtt p BNI-uppgifternas jmfrbarhet (med hjlp av indikatorer) och tillfrlitlighet (genom konfidensintervall).
The Commission entrusted the examination of this matter to two national statistical institutes, which have just completed their work. 
Kommissionen har verltit p tv nationella statistikkontor att underska denna frga, och dessa har just avslutat sitt arbete.
It showed that progress in this area cannot be achieved unless a satisfactory solution to the problems described below is found. 
Resultatet visar att man inte kan gra ngra framsteg om man inte finner en tillfredsstllande lsning p de problem som beskrivs nedan.
Comparison on the basis of the approaches to GNP 69. 
Jmfrelse mellan olika mtperspektiv 69.
In order to improve the quality of the GNP calculated from the various approaches, use is occasionally made of Ôaccount bal-ancingŐ. 
Fr att frbttra kvaliteten p berkningen av BNI utifrn olika mtperspektiv gr man ibland ÓkontobalanseringarÓ.
In some cases quality cannot be measured unless there is a trail through the intermediate stages of construction, especially (1) See footnote 1, page 3. 
I sdana fall kan kvaliteten endast mtas om spr av de mellanliggande etapperna av framstllningen, framfr allt aggregat i olika skeden av jmfrelserna, finns bevarade.
However, this is not the case in all the Member States. 
Detta r dock inte fallet i alla medlemsstater.
The Commission and the Member States should, therefore, make specific provision to this effect. 
Kommissionen och medlemsstaterna skulle behva infra tydliga bestmmelser om detta.
A country which compares two approaches in order to estimate variations in inventories will, in fact, automatically record fewer balancing errors than a country which estimates inventories more directly and, paradoxically, collects more information. 
Ett land som anvnder en jmfrelse mellan tv mtperspektiv fr att uppskatta lagerfrndringar registrerar automatiskt frre balanserings-fel n ett land som uppskattar lagren mer direkt och paradoxalt noganvndermerinformation.
Similarly, a country which uses only one approach for its calculation cannot, therefore, take advantage of the possibility of comparisons between approaches and will not be troubled by comparative differences. 
P samma stt kan ett land som anvnder endast ett mtperspektiv vid berkningen inte dra nytta av att jmfra olika mtperspektiv och fr inga jmfrelsedifferenser.
It will inevitably record less variation, but the quality of the data will not necessarily be any better. 
Det landet fr oundvikligen frre variationer, men uppgifternas kvalitet r inte ndvndigtvis bttre.
Furthermore, as the approaches used in the GNP calculation are never totally independent, balancing two approaches with the same shortcomings would not show up those shortcomings and might have an adverse effect on the quality of the derived aggregate. 
Samtidigt r mtperspektiven fr berkning av BNI aldrig helt oberoende. Detta innebr att en kombination av tv mtperspektiv med samma brister inte skulle pvisa dessa brister, vilket skulle frsmra det berknande aggregatets kvalitet.
In the case of sampling errors, there is some consensus on the statistical techniques. 
Nr det gller urvalsfel finns det ett visst samfrstnd i frga om statistiska metoder.
For other types of error (3), on the other hand, information is either unavailable or subjective. 
Fr andra typer av fel (3) dremot finns det antingen ingen information eller ocks r den subjektiv.
Analysing changes in revisions 75. 
Analys av frndringar i samband med revideringarna 75.
The bias in the early versions of GNP is measured against the final version. 
Systematiska avvikelser i de frsta versionerna av BNI-uppgifterna mts i frhllande till den slutliga versionen.
In order to draw conclusions from such an exercise, the quality of the final version must therefore be evaluated before the revision changes are analysed. 
Fr att dra slutsatser av en sdan jmfrelse mste drfr kvaliteten i den slutliga versionen med ndvndighet utvrderas innan man analyserar frndringar i samband med revideringarna.
In effect, a rudimentary final account that does not use much supplementary information relative to the early versions would indicate a lack of bias in the early versions. 
En elementr slutlig berkning, som inte krver mycket ytterligare information i frhllande till de frsta versionerna, skulle i sjlva verket indikera att det inte finns ngra systematiska avvikelser i de frsta ver-sionerna.
Excessive automatic use of indicators based on changes in revisions would lead to underevaluation of the quality of the GNP of a Member State with an information system which is complex and therefore slow to mobilise. 
Om indikatorer som baseras p frndringar i samband med revideringar anvnds alltfr automatiskt skulle det leda till att man underskattar kvaliteten i BNI-uppgifterna fr ett land med ett komplext och drmed lngsamt informationssystem.
(3) For example errors concerning the parent population or the base, measuring errors, errors in methods, errors in the treatment of failures to reply, errors due to the modelling of economic phenomena. 
(3) Exempelvis fel i huvudpopulationen eller basen, mtfel, metodfel, fel i bearbetning av uteblivna svar, fel p grund av modeller fr ekonomiska fenomen.
27.11.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 336/11 Comparability between Member States 76. 
27.11.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 336/11 Jmfrbarhet mellan medlemsstaterna 76.
National experiments on measuring the quality of economic aggregates are currently pursuing the Member StatesŐ own objectives. 
Vid de nationella frsken att mta de ekonomiska aggregatens kvalitet efterstrvas fr nrvarande medlemsstaternas egna ml.
The primary aim of the latter is to ensure that the aggregates are good indicators of economic trends (growth or recession) and that these indicators provide relevant information on any divergence between growth and a long-term trend or an indication of the economyŐs position within a cycle. 
Det handlar i frsta hand om att frskra sig om att aggregaten r bra indikatorer p den ekonomiska tendensen (tillvxt eller recession), och att dessa indikatorer ger relevant information om avvikelser i tillvxten i frhllande till en lngsiktig tendens eller en indikation p var i konjunkturcykeln ekonomin befinner sig.
It is a question of reaching a consensus on how various types of error are to be evaluated and aggregated in order to give the overall error. 
Det handlar i sjlva verket om att n enighet om det stt p vilket olika typer av fel skall utvrderas och sammanstllas till ett totalt fel.
The CommissionŐs work on defining the quality of the macroeconomic aggregates and the classification of errors is helping to establish a common basis on which all the Member States can begin to measure quality. 
Kommissionens arbete i syfte att faststlla de makroekonomiska aggregatens kvalitet och typer av fel bidrar till upprttandet av en gemensam grund fr alla medlemsstater fr infrandet av kvalitetsmtning.
However, the work done so far has not succeeded in making it possible for quality measurement to be considered from the viewpoint of its comparability between Member States, even though that is a prerequisite for using GNP as a reference aggregate in the Community context. 
Det arbete som hittills utfrts har emellertid inte gjort det mjligt att underska kvalitetsmtning med avseende p mjligheten till jmfrelser mellan medlemsstaterna, vilket nd r en frutsttningfrattBNIsomaggregatskallkunnaanvndassom referens i gemenskapssammanhang.
A certain amount of work therefore needs to be devoted to both this aspect and the problems mentioned in paragraphs 69 to 75, for example in the context of the quality-measurement task-force which the Commission has decided to create. 
Relevant arbete mste drfr gras p detta omrde och vad gller de problem som nmns i punkterna 69Đ75, exempelvis inom den srskilda arbetsgrupp fr kvalitetsmtning som kommissionen har beslutat inrtta.
CONCLUSION An aggregate that is widely used in the Community context 80. 
SLUTSATS Ett aggregat som ofta anvnds inom gemenskapen 80.
GNP is considered to be the best indicator of a Member StateŐs ability to contribute (see paragraph 2). 
BNI anses vara den bsta indikatorn p bidragsfrmgan (punkt 2).
To a large extent it determines the Member StatesŐ contributions to the financing of the Community budget and directly affects certain items of expenditure (paragraphs 6 to 10). 
Den avgr i stor utstrckning medlemsstaternas bidrag till finansieringen av gemenskapsbudgeten och pverkar vissa utgifter direkt (punkterna 6Đ10).
At the same time GNP is the basis for important decisions, such as those taken in the context of economic and monetary union (see paragraph 11). 
BNI ligger samtidigt till grund fr mnga viktiga beslut, ssom de beslut som fattas inom ramen fr Ekonomiska och monetra unionen (punkt 11).
Guaranteeing legitimacy 81. 
Att skerstlla legitimiteten 81.
Essentially GNP measures by estimation a value of production that is, and remains, unknown (see paragraph 1). 
Det karakteristiska med BNI r att den genom en uppskattning mter en produktion vars vrde r och frblir oknt (punkt 1).
Added to the uncertainty associated with the statistical nature of this aggregate is the fact that each Member State applies its own procedures for producing statistics. 
Till de oskerhetsfaktorer som hnger samman med detta aggregats statistiska karaktr skall lggas det faktum att varje medlemsstat tillmpar sina egna metoder fr att ta fram statistik.
In order to guarantee the legitimacy of GNP as a reference aggregate, it is important in the first instance for it to be established transparently on the basis of explicit, well-documented methods. 
Fr att skerstlla BNI:s legitimitet som referensaggregat r det i frsta hand viktigt att berkningen sker under stor ppenhet och genom klart definierade och dokumenterade metoder.
The CommissionŐs role in this context is not just important, it is also unique: at the national level, the only existing controls on the procedures for producing statistics are those set up within the statistical offices. 
Kommissionens roll r inte bara viktig utan till och med exklusiv, eftersom de nationella statistikkontorens kontroller r de enda kontroller av tillvgagngsstten fr framstllning av statistik som grs p nationell niv.
The Commission is thus the only authority thathasbothanoverviewofthesituationandthenecessaryana-lytical and legislative resources (see paragraphs 13 to 17). 
Kommissionen r fljaktligen den enda instans som kan bde ha verblick ver situationen och besitta ndvndiga analys-och lagstiftningsmedel (punkterna 13Đ17).
Any advance in measuring the quality of GNP must, inevitably, enhance its legitimacy (see paragraphs 63 to 79). 
Framsteg i mtningen av BNI-mttets kvalitet kan endast ka dess legitimitet (punkterna 63Đ79).
Completing harmonisation 85. 
Fullfljande av harmoniseringen 85.
Harmonisation of GNP has been a main objective since the adoption of Directive 89/130/EEC, Euratom in 1989. In 1996 the Commission acknowledged, however, that complete harmonisation of GNP had not been achieved and that much work remained to be done. 
Harmoniseringen av BNI r sedan direktiv 89/130/EEG, Euratom antogs 1989 den viktigaste mlsttningen. r 1996 med-gavdockkommissionenattenfullstndigharmoniseringavBNI inte hade uppntts och att mycket arbete fortfarande terstod.
For example, at the beginning of 1999 several members of the GNP Committee still considered that the work of improving GNP data was unfinished. 
I brjan av 1999 ansg exempelvis flera medlemmar i BNI-kommittn att arbetet med att frbttra BNI-uppgifterna inte var avslutat.
Most of the reservations have nevertheless been lifted since then (paragraph 30). 
De flesta frbehll har dock upphvts sedan dess (punkt 30).
The scope and volume of the work that is still necessary should be examined in relation to the present and future role of GNP. Effective controls at Community level 87. 
Omfattningen och vidden av det arbete som terstr skulle frtjna att underskas ytterligare i frhllande till nu aktuella och framtida problem rrande BNI. ndamlsenlig kontroll p gemenskapsniv 87.
The existence of a European system of economic accounts and of several other legislative provisions cannot, in itself, guarantee that data are reliable and comparable (see paragraph 50). 
Ett gemensamt europeiskt nationalrkenskapssystem samt flera andra lagstadgade bestmmelser rcker inte fr att garantera att uppgifterna r tillfrlitliga och jmfrbara (punkt 50).
Tests on the chosen data must cover the intrinsic reliability of each statistical system, the conceptual comparability (compliance with the ESA) and the practical comparability (sources and methods used). This entails examining the statistical organisation 
En granskning av faststllda uppgifter br med ndvndighet omfatta varje statistiksystems tillfrlitlighet, begreppsmssig jmfrbarhet (efterlevnad av ENS) samt praktisk jmfrbarhet (anvnda kllor och metoder). Detta innefattar en underskning
C 336/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 27.11.2000 of the Member States, the conditions under which the basic data are produced, the compatibility and independence of the various sources, balancing procedures and confidence limits. 
C 336/12 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 27.11.2000 av medlemsstaternas statistikorganisation, omstndigheterna vid framstllningen av grundlggande uppgifter, olika kllors samstmmighet och oberoende, sammanstllningsfrfaranden och tillfrlitlighetstrsklar.
The CourtŐs checks revealed the existence of several problems that affect the procedures for checking and validating GNP. 
Revisionsrttens kontroller har visat att det finns flera problem rrande frfarandena fr granskning och godknnande av BNI.
The shortcomings noted in terms of compliance with the ESA, transparency of the adjustments, bias of comparability and outdated sources could affect the quality of the data relative to the applicable provisions (see paragraphs 32 to 52). 
De konstaterade bristerna vad gller efterlevnad av ENS, ppenhet betrffande justeringar, systematiska avvikelser vad gller jmfrbarhet samt inaktuella kllor skulle kunna pverka uppgifternas kvalitet i frhllande till tillmpliga bestmmelser (punkterna 32Đ52).
Despite certain improvements that have been made in recent years, the Commission has not yet adopted sufficiently transparent analytical procedures for validating the data used in calculating GNP. 
Trots vissa frbttringar under de senaste ren har kommissionen fortfarande inte infrt tillrckligt ppna analysfrfaranden fr godknnande av de uppgifter som anvnts vid berkningen av BNI.
The objectives and content of its inspection activities This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in should be better defined and documented (see paragraphs 53 to 59). 
Granskningsverksamhetens syfte och omfattning br specificeras och dokumenteras bttre (punkterna 53Đ59).
It appears essential for the Commission to quantify the impact of its reservations on GNP. 
Det tycks vara ndvndigt att kommissionen kvantifierar konsekvenserna av de frbehll den gjort avseende berkningen av BNI.