natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This is due to the fact that the system had not yet been developed or foreseen at the time the contracts were signed and the Commission made no such provision in the financing agreements. 
Detta beror p att systemet inte hade utvecklats eller ens planerats nr kontrakten tecknades, och kommissionen tog heller inte med ngon bestmmelse om detta i finansieringsavtalen.
At the time of the audit, the Commission had developed a set of 19 aggregated indicators for this monitoring platform, common to all three windows. 
Vid tidpunkten fr vr revision hade kommissionen tagit fram en uppsttning med 19 aggregerade indikatorer fr denna vervakningsplattform, som var gemensam fr alla tre fnstren.
However, some of these indicators overlap, and the link between these and the higher-level indicators found at the TF’s overall results framework is not always clear (see Box 4). 
Vissa av dessa indikatorer verlappar dock varandra och kopplingen mellan dem och indikatorerna p hgre niv, i frvaltningsfondens vergripande resultatram, r inte alltid tydlig (se ruta 4).
26 Box 4 – Weaknesses related to the 19 aggregate indicators - There is a potential overlap between indicators 2.3 (Number of people receiving nutrition assistance) and 2.4 (Number of people receiving food-security related assistance). 
Ruta 4 Đ Svagheter hos de 19 aggregerade indikatorerna Đ Det finns en potentiell verlappning mellan indikatorerna 2.3 (antalet personer som fr nringsstd) och 2.4 (antalet personer som fr std relaterat till livsmedelsskerhet).
The definition for both indicators includes training on agricultural practices; - the indicators do not cover the full range of projects of the EUTF for Africa (for example, project 6); - linking/mapping these common output indicators to the thousands of indicators at project level and then to the TF’s overall Results Framework, as well as to the Valletta Action Plan priorities, is a very difficult task. 
Đ Indikatorerna omfattar inte samtliga projekt inom ramen fr frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika (t.ex. inte projekt 6). Đ Att koppla/kartlgga dessa gemensamma outputindikatorer till de tusentals indikatorerna p projektniv och sedan till frvaltningsfondens vergripande resultatram samt till prioriteringarna i 27 38 En beskrivning av ett projekt med vergripande ml, delml och indikatorer.
The HoA window has decided, on its own initiative, to outsource this task to technical experts. 
I fnstret Afrikas horn har man dock p eget initiativ beslutat att ge externa tekniska experter detta i uppdrag.
So far, the SLC window has chosen to use the CAD system (Collect, Analyse and Disseminate), while HoA is using the MLS system (Monitoring and Learning System). 
Hittills har man i fnstret Sahel-och Tchadsjregionen valt att anvnda ett system fr insamling, analys och spridning av information, medan fnstret fr Afrikas horn anvnder sig av ett system fr vervakning och lrande.
The plethora of information and monitoring systems means there is no single, comprehensive overview of the results achieved by the EUTF for Africa as a whole. 
De mnga olika informations-och vervakningssystemen medfr att det inte finns ngon gemensam, heltckande versikt av vilka resultat som har uppntts fr frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika som helhet.
Furthermore, there is no clear demarcation between the implementing partners’ monitoring responsibilities and those of the Commission or EUDELs. 
Det finns heller ingen tydlig avgrnsning mellan genomfrandepartnernas respektive kommissionens eller EU-delegationernas vervakningsansvar.
For example, in one project in Niger (project 7), the entire project budget was spent in 12 months, instead of the foreseen 36, and mainly addressed one objective shared with other donors (direct assistance to migrants). 
Till exempel anvndes hela projektbudgeten i ett projekt i Niger (projekt 7) inom tolv mnader, i stllet fr de 36 mnader som planerats, frmst till ett och samma ml som delades med andra givare (direktstd till migranter).
The other two objectives, governance and actions linked to development, was mostly left unaddressed. 
De bda andra mlen, styrning och insatser kopplade till utveckling, sidosattes i stort sett helt och hllet.
We also noted a pattern of delays39 in projects related to security, border management and similar areas. 
Vi noterade ven ett mnster nr det gller frseningar39 av projekt kopplade till skerhet, grnsfrvaltning och liknande omrden.
At the time of the audit, no ROM40 reports had been issued for any of the projects included in the audit. 
Nr vi gjorde vr revision hade inga rapporter om resultatorienterad vervakning40 utarbetats fr ngot av de projekt som ingick i vr revision.
The Commission had visited all projects implemented in Niger at least once, which allowed Commission staff to follow the projects. 
Kommissionen hade minst en gng beskt alla projekt som genomfrdes i Niger, vilket gjorde det mjligt fr kommissionens personal att flja projekten.
In Libya, due to the difficult security situation, the Commission had not been able to visit all ongoing projects. 
I Libyen hade kommissionen inte kunnat beska alla pgende projekt p grund av den svra skerhetssituationen.
However, the Commission was examining the possibility of introducing third-party monitoring (i.e. contracting monitoring to local parties). 
Kommissionen underskte emellertid mjligheterna att infra vervakning genom tredje man (dvs. ge lokala parter i uppdrag att bedriva vervakning).
In agreement with EUDEL, they develop or update the indicators and targets. Project 11, delayed by 3.5 months; project 5, delayed by 7 months, and project 4, a two-year project, which now needs an extension in order to deliver its main results. 
En viktig aspekt av vervakningen r att Projekt 11 (frsenat med tre och en halv mnad), projekt 5 (frsenat med sju mnader) och projekt 4, ett tvrigt projekt som nu behver utkas fr att dess viktigaste resultat ska kunna uppns.
Results-oriented monitoring. The ROM system was established by EuropeAid in 2000 to strengthen the monitoring, evaluation and transparency of development aid. 
Det resultatorienterade vervakningssystemet inrttades r 2000 av EuropeAid fr att strka vervakning och utvrdering av samt insyn i utvecklingsbistnd.
It is based on short, focused, on-site assessments by external experts. It uses a structured and consistent methodology against five criteria: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, potential impact and likely sustainability. 
Det bygger p att externa experter gr korta, riktade bedmningar p plats, enligt en strukturerad och enhetlig metod som utgr frn fem kriterier: relevans, effektivitet, ndamlsenlighet, potentiell effekt och sannolik hllbarhet.
According to the Commission, this approach provides some flexibility in a difficult context and makes it possible to gather data not available at the outset. 
Enligt kommissionen ger detta tillvgagngsstt en viss flexibilitet i ett svrt sammanhang och gr det mjligt att samla in data som inte funnits tillgngliga frn brjan.
However, even after the logical frameworks were updated, the audited projects lacked measurable targets and therefore the specific objectives were still not SMART41 (see Box 5). 
Men ven efter att ramdokumentationen hade uppdaterats saknade de granskade projekten mtbara delml, vilket innebar att de srskilda mlen fortfarande inte motsvarade Smart-konceptet41 (se ruta 5).
28 Box 5 – Examples of unspecific objectives in the SLC window Project 8: ‘support the implementation of structural and short-term measures’ Project 9: ‘support to the delegated project management’ Project 10: ‘the steering of educational actions is improved’ Project 10: ‘the employability of the young is improved’ 50. 
29 Ruta 5 Đ Exempel p ospecifika ml i fnstret Sahel-och Tchadsjregionen Projekt 8: stdja genomfrandet av strukturella och kortsiktiga tgrder Projekt 9: ge std till den delegerade projektledningen Projekt 10: frbttrad styrning av utbildningsinsatser Projekt 10: frbttrad anstllbarhet fr unga 50.
In one project (project 10), an indicator was based on a subsequent political decision by the local authorities. 
I ett projekt (projekt 10) baserades en indikator p ett efterfljande politiskt beslut av de lokala myndigheterna.
This type of indicator is weak, as the implementing partners have no influence on such decisions and cannot be held accountable. 
Detta slags indikatorer r tvivelaktiga eftersom genomfrandepartnerna inte har ngot inflytande ver sdana beslut och drfr inte kan hllas ansvariga.
We also found indicators based on beneficiaries’ opinions (e.g. outcomes of surveys), which are subjective and difficult to verify. 
Vi fann ven indikatorer som baserades p stdmottagarnas sikter (t.ex. enktutfall), som r subjektiva och svra att verifiera.
Other indicators were included in the framework because the implementing partners used them for their internal reporting. 
Andra indikatorer ingick i ramen eftersom genomfrandepartnerna anvnde dem i sin interna rapportering.
Baselines were a weak point in all of the logframes we analysed, even those that had been revised. 
I alla de ramdokumentationer som vi analyserade var utgngsvrdena dock en svag punkt, ven i dem som hade reviderats.
In most cases, the baseline value linked to specific indicators was zero or marked ́N/A ́42, making it impossible to present the Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, timed. 
I de flesta fallen var det utgngsvrde som kopplades till specifika indikatorer noll eller markerat som ej tillmpligt42, vilket gr det omjligt att bedma framstegen i relativa termer.
In one case, the indicators had no baselines but were measured anyway43. 
I ett fall hade indikatorerna inte ngra utgngsvrden alls, men bedmdes nd43.
Outputs of ongoing projects 52. 
Output frn pgende projekt 52.
At the time of the audit, the projects funded by the EUTF for Africa were generally at an early phase of implementation, but the audited projects in Libya and Niger had started to produce their first outputs (see Box 6 for examples). 
Nr vi genomfrde vr revision befann sig de projekt som finansierades av frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika verlag i ett tidigt skede av genomfrandet, men de granskade projekten i Libyen och Niger hade brjat generera viss output (se ruta 6 fr exempel).
In Niger, the audit team visited, among other projects, the migrant transit centre and one of the 15 established migration observatories in Agadez and held interviews with police investigators involved in dismantling trafficking networks. 
I Niger beskte revisionsgruppen bland flera andra projekt transitcentrumet fr migranter och ett av de 15 inrttade migrationsobservatorierna i Agadez samt intervjuade polisutredare som arbetade med att upplsa ntverk fr mnniskohandel.
In Libya it was not possible to visit any of the ongoing projects due to the security situation. 
I Libyen var det inte mjligt att beska ngot av de pgende projekten p grund av skerhetssituationen.
Box 6 – Examples of outputs in ongoing audited projects According to the progress reports delivered by the implementing partners (validated by the Commission) we noted the following examples of project outputs: Niger Project 7: provided acceptable living conditions to migrants in the Migrant Transit Centre in Agadez (one of four in Niger). 
Ruta 6 Đ Exempel p output frn pgende granskade projekt I de framstegsrapporter som lmnats av genomfrandepartnerna (och validerats av kommissionen) noterade vi fljande exempel p projektoutput: Niger Projekt 7: Godtagbara levnadsvillkor fr migranter i transitcentrumet fr migranter i Agadez (ett av fyra centrum i Niger) har uppntts. ver 9 000 migranter passerade genom dessa centrum 2017.
Over 9 000 migrants passed through these centres in 2017; Project 8: created 15 observatories to monitor the local consequences of migration and identify potential mitigating actions; Project 11: dismantled 7 national and 12 international trafficking networks thanks to joint police investigation teams in 2017. 
30 42 43 Projekt 11: Sju nationella och tolv internationella ntverk fr mnniskohandel har upplsts tack vare gemensamma polisutredningsgrupper under 2017.
Libya Project 19, under one of its objectives: - supported 4 709 migrants with voluntary return assistance, - provided humanitarian assistance to 19 605 migrants in the form of non-food items and hygiene kits in different detention centres, - performed rapid needs assessments for migrants and provided medical assistance to over 6 000 migrants, 43 In project 7 indicators provided figures showing the achievement of targets on assistance at the transit centres and assisted voluntary returns (e.g. 380 %, 415 %, 225 %, etc.) but without any baseline estimate for comparison. 
Libyen Projekt 19 har inom ramen fr ett av sina ml Đ gett std till 4 709 migranter vid frivilligt tervndande, Đ tillhandahllit humanitrt bistnd till 19 605 migranter i form av andra frndenheter n livsmedel samt hygienpaket i olika frvarsenheter, Đ snabbt utfrt behovsbedmningar fr migranter och gett ver 6 000 migranter lkarvrd.
30 - The protection unit provided housing support to 929 persons (including pregnant women and unaccompanied children). 
Đ Skyddsenheten tillhandahll boendestd till 929 personer (inklusive gravida kvinnor och ensamkommande barn).
The technical cooperation unit trained 21 government officials on human rights and vulnerability assessments. 
Den tekniska samarbetsenheten utbildade 21 statstjnstemn i mnskliga rttigheter och srbarhetsanalyser.
According to Frontex figures, the global number of illegal border crossings of migrants to the EU shows an overall peak in 2016, followed by a decrease in 2017 (see Figure 5). 
Enligt uppgifter frn Frontex ndde det totala antalet migranter som olagligt korsat EU:s grnser en topp 2016 och minskade sedan under 2017 (se figur 5).
The EUTF for Africa is one of many instruments - EU and non-EU – contributing to the improvement in the figures, which are uneven across the three windows. 
Frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika r ett av flera instrument Đ inom och utanfr EU Đ som bidrar till att frbttra siffrorna, som ser olika ut fr de tre fnstren.
Figure 5 - Illegal border crossings of migrants into the EU, originating from the regions covered by the EUTF for Africa Source: ECA based on Frontex data from 2014 to 2017. 54. 
Figur 5 Đ Olaglig grnspassage till EU av migranter med ursprung i de regioner som omfattas av frvaltningsfonden fr ndtgrder i Afrika 31 Nordafrika 2014 2015 21 603 2016 2017 Sahel-och Tchadsjregionen 42 601 65 297 114 814 76 889 10 773 19 393 27 912 Afrikas horn 46 536 70 875 42 850 17 984 Totalt fr frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika 99 910 157 775 177 057 122 785 Klla: Revisionsrtten, baserat p uppgifter frn Frontex 2014Đ2017.
The EUTF for Africa 2017 annual report does not report comprehensively on the results achieved so far, but instead reports on the number of projects approved, funds spent and examples of outputs delivered. 
54. rsrapporten 2017 fr frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika innehller ingen vergripande redogrelse fr de resultat som uppntts hittills, utan i stllet uppgifter om antalet godknda projekt, anvnda medel och exempel p levererad output.
Although the annual report is a single, consolidated document, reporting is not consistent between the three windows. 
Trots att rsrapporten bestr av ett enda, konsoliderat dokument r uppgifterna fr de tre fnstren inte konsekventa.
For example, under Chapter 3 (‘Strategic orientations, implementations and results’) the annual report presents tables for each window allocating the funds between the priorities supported under the relevant window. 
Till exempel finns det i rsrapportens tredje avsnitt om strategiska inriktningar, genomfrande och resultat tabeller fr varje fnster ver tilldelade medel, frdelade mellan de olika prioriteringar som stds inom ramen fr det berrda fnstret.
This means that funds allocated between priorities and windows cannot be easily compared. 
Detta innebr att de medel som tilldelas de olika prioriteringarna och fnstren inte kan jmfras p ett enkelt stt.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 55. 
SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 55.
Facing significant challenges, the EUTF for Africa was created as an emergency trust fund to contribute to address the crises in three regions in Africa. 
Mot bakgrund av stora utmaningar inrttades EU:s frvaltningsfond fr Afrika fr ndtgrder, fr att bidra till att motverka kriserna i tre regioner i Afrika.
It has not defined which particular crises (e.g. per regions, per countries, the causes and impact on stability) the TF is meant to address. 
Det har inte faststllts vilka srskilda kriser (t.ex. per region eller land, orsaker och pverkan p stabiliteten) som frvaltningsfonden r avsedd att tgrda.
While the broad objectives of the TF allow flexibility, this has come at the expense of having a strategy that is focused enough to steer action across the three windows and supports the measuring and reporting on results. 
Fondens brett definierade ml tillter flexibilitet, men priset fr detta r att det saknas en tillrckligt tydligt inriktad strategi fr att styra insatserna inom de tre fnstren och frmja mtning och rapportering av resultat.
Furthermore, the strategic guidance provided to TF managers has so far not been very specific (see paragraphs 15 to 19). 
Den strategiska vgledningen till de frvaltningsansvariga har hittills inte varit srskilt specifik (punkterna 15Đ19).
When needs were identified, we found that they were not quantified, just as a critical mass of funding had not been defined. 
Vi fann att de behov som nd identifierades inte kvantifierades, och det definierades inte heller ngon s kallad kritisk massa fr finansiering.
Furthermore, we found that the pooling of resources and capacities was not carried out in an optimal and systematic way. 
Vi konstaterade ven att man inte hade sammanfrt resurser och kapacitet p ett optimalt och systematiskt stt.
In addition, an appropriate lessons-learned mechanism had not yet been developed (see paragraphs 20 to 24). 
Dessutom fanns det nnu inte ngon utvecklad mekanism fr att tillvarata lrdomar (se punkterna 20Đ24).
31 Recommendation 1 –Improve the quality of the objectives of the EUTF for Africa The Commission should propose to the Trust Fund Board a review of the existing objectives and priorities of the EUTF for Africa to make them more specific and achievable. 
Rekommendation 1 Đ Frbttra kvaliteten p mlen fr frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika Kommissionen br fresl fr frvaltningsfondens styrelse att en versyn grs av befintliga ml och prioriteringar fr frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika s att de blir mer specifika och uppnbara.
It should take into account the particular challenges of the three windows, and to the extent possible, include targets and baselines. 
Vid versynen br hnsyn tas till de specifika utmaningarna i de tre fnstren och, 32
In this exercise, the Commission should, in particular, use: (a) the outputs of the Research and Evidence Facilities; (b) the capabilities of all donors; and (c) a lessons-learned mechanism for the TF as a whole. 
I detta arbete br kommissionen framfr allt anvnda sig av a) output frn forsknings-och underlagsavdelningen, b) kapaciteten hos alla givare, c) en mekanism fr att tillvarata lrdomar inom frvaltningsfonden som helhet.
Timeframe: end of 2019. 
Tidsram: slutet av 2019.
The procedures for selecting projects vary between windows. 
Vilka frfaranden som anvnds fr att vlja ut projekt varierar fr de olika fnstren.
We found no documented assessment of project proposals against predefined criteria. 
Vi fann inte ngon dokumenterad bedmning av projektfrslag som prvats mot p frhand faststllda kriterier.
The comparative advantage of funding projects through the EUTF for Africa was not always well explained and we found examples of projects addressing similar needs as other EU instruments (see paragraphs 33 to 38). 
Den komparativa frdelen med att finansiera projekt genom frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika framgick inte alltid tydligt, och vi kunde konstatera att det fanns exempel p projekt som var inriktade p i stort sett samma behov som andra EU-instrument (se punkterna 33Đ 38).
Recommendation 2 – Revise the selection procedure for projects The Commission should: (a) establish clear common criteria applied across windows and document the assessment of project proposals against these criteria; (b) provide the OpComs with a list of received proposals that have not been developed into an Action Fiche, including the reasons for their rejection, by the TF Manager; (c) inform the OpComs of any substantial changes to already approved projects (i.e. changes in objectives, budget and duration); (d) create a dedicated section in the Action Fiche demonstrating the comparative advantage of supporting the project through the EUTF for Africa rather than through other forms of EU support. 
Rekommendation 2 Đ Se ver frfarandet fr urval av projekt Kommissionen br vidta fljande tgrder: a) Faststlla tydliga gemensamma kriterier som tillmpas inom alla fnster och dokumentera bedmningen av projektfrslag i frhllande till dessa kriterier. b) Genom de frvaltningsansvariga lmna en frteckning till de operativa kommitterna ver de inkomna projektfrslag som inte har vidareutvecklats till tgrdsunderlag, inbegripet en motivering till varfr de ftt avslag. c) Underrtta de operativa kommitterna om vsentliga ndringar av redan godknda projekt (dvs. ndringar av ml, budget och lptid).
Timeframe: mid 2019. 
Tidsram: mitten av 2019.
While the EUTF for Africa operates in an exceptional situation, the Commission has not made full use of accelerated measures. 
Trots att insatserna inom ramen fr frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika ger rum under mycket speciella omstndigheter har kommissionen inte fullt ut anvnt sig av pskyndade tgrder.
Such measures could facilitate the work of the implementing partners and allow project activities to start quicker (see paragraphs 39 to 44). 
Sdana tgrder kan underltta genomfrandepartnernas arbete och gra det mjligt att inleda projektinsatser snabbare (se punkterna 39Đ44).
The EUTF for Africa adopted a common monitoring system. 
Frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika har antagit ett gemensamt vervakningssystem.
However, it is not yet operational and the three windows have so far used different systems for gathering budgetary information, monitoring and evaluation. 
Detta r emellertid nnu inte fullt funktionellt och de tre fnstren har hittills anvnt olika system fr att samla in budgetinformation, bedriva vervakning och gra utvrderingar.
The audited projects were at an early phase of implementation but had started to produce outputs (see paragraphs 45 to 53). 
De granskade projekten befann sig i ett tidigt skede av genomfrandet men hade brjat generera output (se punkterna 45Đ53).
Timeframe: end 2019. Recommendation 4 – Improve the monitoring of the EUTF for Africa The Commission should: (a) make the common monitoring system fully operational; (b) include SMART objectives in the project logframes, and improve the quality of indicators by establishing quantified baselines and targets. 
35 Rekommendation 4 Đ Frbttra vervakningen av frvaltningsfonden fr Afrika Kommissionen br vidta fljande tgrder: a) Gra det gemensamma vervakningssystemet fullt funktionellt. b) Inbegripa ml som motsvarar Smart-konceptet i projektets ramdokumentation och frbttra indikatorernas kvalitet genom att faststlla kvantifierade utgngsvrden och delml.
This Report was adopted by Chamber III, headed by Mrs Bettina JAKOBSEN, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 16 October 2018. 
Denna rapport antogs av revisionsrttens avdelning III, med ledamoten Bettina Jakobsen som ordfrande, vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 16 oktober 2018.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President 34 
Fr revisionsrtten Klaus-Heiner Lehne ordfrande