natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For Romania the plan indicated that more stringent limits are required in a limited number of agglomerations but it is not clear whether this is sufficient in terms of covering all water bodies subject to important organic and nutrient pollution; я the issue of rainwater management was only partially addressed by the Member States. 
I Ungerns fall angavs inte tgrdens omfattning. I Rumniens fall angav planen att strngare grnsvrden krvs i ett begrnsat antal ttorter, men det r inte klart huruvida detta r tillrckligt fr att tcka alla vattenfrekomster som pverkas av betydande organisk frorening och frorening orsakad av nringsmnen.
Both overflows я occurring during heavy rainfall when the capacity of a sewage network and/or a treatment plant is not sufficient я and urban run-off20 can lead to water pollution. 
Bde brddningar Đ som intrffar vid kraftigt regn nr kapaciteten hos ett avloppsnt och/eller en reningsanlggning inte rcker till Đ och urban avrin-ning20 kan leda till vattenfrore-ning.
Hungary included a specific measure consisting mainly in the establishment of a national rainwater management plan and Romania identified agglomerations which need rainwater collection systems. 
Ungern hade med en specifik tgrd som frmst bestod av upprttandet av en nationell plan fr hantering av regnvatten, och Rumnien identifierade ttorter som behvde ledningsnt fr regnvatten.
None of the plans included specific measures to deal with overflows21; 20 Due to the fact that in urban areas there are a lot of impervious surfaces, the water from rain falls or snow melts cannot soak into the ground and thus the water runs off, carrying all kind of pollutants. 
Ingen av planerna innehll specifika tgrder fr att hantera versvmningar21. 20 P grund av att det i stadsomrden finns mnga ogenomtrngliga ytor kan dagvatten inte trnga ner i jorden, och det vatten som rinner av innehller drfr alla mjliga frorenande mnen.
21 In Special Report No 2/2015 (paragraphs 53 to 55) the Court noted that for overflows there is a general lack of information on their quantity and pollution parameters. 
21 I srskild rapport nr 2/2015 (punkterna 53Đ55) konstaterade revisionsrtten att det i frga om brddningar rder allmn brist p information om deras volym och frorenings-parametrar.
Moreover, in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Romania there are no legal requirements for either an admissible number and volume of overflows or for a dilution ratio. 
I Tjeckien, Ungern och Rumnien finns det dessutom inga lagstadgade krav p vare sig ett godtagbart antal eller en godtagbar volym nr det gller brddningar eller p en utspdningsgrad.
In Slovakia such requirements exist and determine the required size of the overflow chambers. 
Sdana krav finns i Slovakien och avgr vilken storlek brddningstankarna ska ha.
Observations 22 22 In Special Report No 23/2012 тHave EU structural measures successfully supported the regeneration of industrial and military brownfield sites?у the Court indicated a number of obstacles that hinder the setting of priorities with regard to the regeneration of sites (such as a lack of complete and appropriate registers on contaminated sites) (see paragraphs 37 to 44) (http://eca.europa.eu). 
Iakttagelser 22 22 I srskild rapport nr 23/2012 Har EU:s strukturtgrder till std fr terstllande av frfallna industri-och militr-omrden varit framgngsrika? pekade revisionsrtten p ett antal hinder fr att faststlla prioriteringar nr det gller terstllande av omrden (t.ex. att det saknas fullstndiga och lmpliga register ver frorenade omrden) (se punkterna 37Đ44) (http://eca. europa.eu).
23 In this context an OECD paper on тWater quality and agriculture: meeting the policy challengeу, published in 2012, mentions that meeting the challenges of sustainable management of water quality in agriculture requires a high level of political commitment. я since the late 1990s the presence of micropollutants has increasingly been recognised as an issue in the context of water quality. 
23 I detta sammanhang sgs i OECD-dokumentet Water Quality and Agriculture: Meeting the Policy Challenge (vattenkvalitet och jordbruk: hur den politiska utmaningen ska mtas) som publicerades 2012 att det krvs starkt politiskt engagemang fr att mta de utmaningar som fljer av hllbar frvaltning av vattenkvaliteten inom jordbruket.
Micro-pollutants are typically found in pharmaceutical products, personal care products and food additives. 
Mikrofroreningar ptrffas vanligtvis i lkemedel, kropps-vrdsprodukter och livsmedelstillsatser.
Pollution from industrial installations: lack of targeted measures 37 A тbasic measureу for tackling pollution from industrial installations is the implementation of the industrial emissions directive (see Table 1). 
Frorening frn industrianlggningar: brist p riktade tgrder 37 En Ógrundlggande tgrdÓ fr att komma till rtta med frorening frn industrianlggningar r att genomfra direktivet om industriutslpp (se tabell 1).
38 With regard to тother basicу and уsup-plementary measuresу, the Court identified the following shortcomings in the 2009 river basin management plans of the four Member States: я in order to reduce pollution from hazardous substances, measures are required that target those substances which prevent water bodies from achieving good ecological and chemical status. 
38 Vad betrffar Óandra grundlggandeÓ och Ókompletterande tgrderÓ konstaterade revisionsrtten fljande brister i de fyra medlemsstaternas frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009: Ń Fr att minska froreningarna frn farliga mnen krvs tgrder som r inriktade p de mnen som gr att vattenfrekomster inte uppnr god ekologisk och kemisk status.
However, none of the four Member States had measures targeting specific substances; я while all four Member States included measures regarding the rehabilitation of contaminated and/or waste disposal sites, only the plans of the Czech Republic and Slovakia identified sites that were considered as posing a risk to water quality. 
Men ingen av de fyra medlemsstaterna hade med tgrder som r inriktade p specifika mnen. Ń Alla fyra medlemsstater hade med tgrder fr terstllande av frorenade omrden och/eller avfalls-deponier, men endast i Tjeckiens och Slovakiens planer identifierades omrden som ansgs utgra en risk fr vattenkvaliteten.
Nevertheless, the Court found that the selected sites did not necessarily correspond to those sites prioritised for decontamination by the national bodies responsible for decontamination strategy22. 
Trots det konstaterade revisionsrtten att de utvalda omrdena inte ndvndigtvis motsvarade de omrden som de nationella organen med ansvar fr saneringsstrategin hade prioriterat fr sanering22.
Pollution from agriculture: measures in addition to the nitrates directive are mainly of a voluntary nature 39 The тbasic measureу for tackling pollution from agriculture is the implementation of the nitrates directive (see Table 1). 
Frorening frn jordbruket: tgrder utver nitratdirektivet r frivilliga 39 Den Ógrundlggande tgrdenÓ fr att komma till rtta med frorening frn jordbruket r att genomfra nitratdirektivet (se tabell 1).
40 With regard to тother basicу and тsupplementary measuresу, the river basin management plans of the four Member States mainly referred to the measures under the rural development programmes where farmers can engage in actions going beyond compulsory legislation (such as fertilisation rules stricter than those of the nitrates directive). 
40 Vad betrffar Óandra grundlggandeÓ och Ókompletterande tgrderÓ hnvisade de fyra medlemsstaternas frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt frmst till tgrderna inom landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen dr jordbrukarna kan g utver den bindande lagstiftningen (t.ex. tillmpa strngare regler fr anvndningen av gdselmedel n de som anges i nitratdirektivet).
These measures are however of a voluntary nature only and thus may not cover the areas where water pollution is most significant (see also paragraphs 145 to 157)23. 
De tgrderna r dock frivilliga och tcker eventuellt inte de omrden dr vattenfro-reningen r som strst (se ven punkterna 145Đ157)23.
Observations 23 41 The Court also identified the following shortcomings in the 2009 river basin management plans of the four Member States: я although phosphorus from diffuse pollution plays a significant role in the nutrient pollution of water bodies, there was no indication я in any of the programmes я of measures directly targeted at limiting the amount of phosphorus to be applied on land (kg/ha)24; я measures targeted at reducing erosion я which contributes significantly to phosphorus pollution я were indicated in the programmes of measures of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Romania. 
Iakttagelser 23 41 Revisionsrtten konstaterade ocks fljande brister i de fyra medlemsstaternas frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009: Ń Trots att fosfor frn diffus frorening spelar en betydande roll i den frorening av vattenfrekomster som orsakas av nringsmnen, innehll inte ngot program uppgifter om tgrder som var direkt inriktade p att begrnsa den mngd fosfor som sprids p jordbruksmark (kg/ha)24. Ń tgrder fr att minska erosionen Đ som p ett betydande stt bidrar till fosforfroreningar Đ angavs i Tjeckiens, Ungerns och Rumniens tgrdsprogram.
Nevertheless, in Hungary the measure refers to the application of the relevant GAEC standard (see Box 3), whereas, in the programmes of the Czech Republic and Romania, there is a lack of detail as to how the measures are to be carried out; я measures targeted at reducing the use of pesticides were mentioned in the programmes of measures of all four Member States. 
Men i Ungern avser tgrden tillmpningen av den berrda normen fr god jordbrukshvd och goda miljfrhllanden (se ruta 3), medan det i Tjeckiens och Rumniens program saknas nrmare uppgifter om hur tgrderna ska genomfras.
However, the measures were vague or they referred to the pesticide action plans that were to be adopted and communicated to the Commission by 26 November 2012 as requested by the pesticides directive (see Table 2). 
Ń tgrder fr minskad anvndning av bekmpningsmedel nmndes i alla fyra medlemsstaters tgrdsprogram. tgrderna var dock vaga eller hnvisade till de handlingsplaner fr bekmpningsmedel som skulle antas och verlmnas till kommissionen senast den 26 november 2012 enligt direktivet om bekmpningsmedel (se tabell 2).
Meaningful information regarding the funding of the measures is missing 42 The Court found that an estimation of the costs was not provided for all measures set out in the 2009 river basin management plans. 
Viktig information om finansieringen av tgrderna saknas 42 Revisionsrtten konstaterade att det saknades uppskattning av kostnaderna fr alla de tgrder som angavs i frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009.
Information on the sources and availability of funds was only partial for the four Member States. 
Informationen om kllorna till och tillgngen p medel var ofullstndig nr det gllde alla fyra medlemsstaterna.
43 The absence of information on costs and on the expected results of the measures (see paragraph 34) hinders the identification of the most cost-effective measures. 
43 Eftersom information om kostnader och om de frvntade resultaten av tgrderna saknas (se punkt 34) gr det inte att identifiera de kostnadseffektivaste tgrderna.
44 Funding provided outside of EU programmes is rare. 
44 Finansiering tillhandahlls sllan utanfr EU:s program.
The major funding sources are the programmes co-financed by the EU via the European Regional Development Fund/Cohesion Fund as well as the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development. 
De viktigaste finansieringskllorna r de program som medfinansieras av EU via Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden/Sam-manhllningsfonden och Europeiska jordbruksfonden fr landsbygdsutveckling.
The priorities and financial allocation decided in these programmes thus have an impact on progress in the field of water quality. 
De prioriteringar och den anslagsfrdelning som faststlls i dessa program pverkar drfr de framsteg som grs nr det gller vattenkvaliteten.
However, coordination between the bodies approving priorities and projects and the bodies approving the programme of measures of the river basin management plans has not always been achieved (see also paragraph 38). 
Man har dock inte alltid lyckats samordna de organ som godknner prioriteringar och projekt med de organ som godknner tgrdsprogrammet i frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt (se ven punkt 38).
24 Fertilisers include as active substances in particular one or more of the following: nitrogen, phosphate and potash. 
24 Som verksamma mnen i gdselmedel ingr srskilt ett eller flera av fljande mnen: kvve, fosfat och kaliumklorid.
Observations 24 Significant number of water bodies exempted from the 2015 and 2021 deadlines 45 According to the 2009 river basin management plans, the four Member States exempted a significant number of water bodies from the 2015 deadline (see Table 5) but without providing clear justifications for the time extensions granted. 
Iakttagelser 24 Mnga vattenfrekomster var undantagna frn tidsfristerna 2015 och 2021 45 Enligt frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009 undantog de fyra medlemsstaterna ett betydande antal vattenfrekomster frn tidsfristen 2015 (se tabell 5) utan att ge ngon tydlig motivering till det.
46 The number of exemptions within the 2015 draft river basin management plans remains high, with the exception of Romania and, for chemical status, Slovakia. 
46 Antalet undantag i utkasten till 2015 rs frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt r fortsatt hgt, med undantag av Rumnien och, nr det gller kemisk status, Slovakien.
This means that for the exempted water bodies good water quality can only be expected to be achieved in the 2021-2027 period. 
Det innebr att man inte kan rkna med att uppn god vattenkvalitet i de undantagna vatten-frekomsterna frrn under perioden 2021Đ2027.
Surface water bodies exempted (as % of the total number of surface water bodies) Member State 2009 river basin management plans 2015 draft river basin management plans 2009 river basin management plans 2015 draft river basin management plans Ecological status Chemical status Czech Republic 90 % 63 % 31 % 36 % Hungary 88 % 84 % 44 %2 75 % Romania 36 % 14 % 6% 2% Slovakia 1 47 % 1 1% 1 Slovakia provided a figure (37 %) which relates to both ecological and chemical status taken together. 
Undantagna ytvattenfrekomster (i % av det totala antalet ytvattenfrekomster) Medlemsstat Frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009 Utkast till 2015 rs frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt Frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009 Utkast till 2015 rs frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt Ekologisk status Kemisk status Tjeckien 90 % 63 % 31 % 36 % Ungern 88 % 84 % 44 %2 75 % Rumnien 36 % 14 % 6% 2% Slovakien 1 47 % 1 1% 1 Slovakien lmnade en uppgift (37 %) som gller svl ekologisk som kemisk status.
2 The percentage was calculated on the number of bodies with known status. 
2 Procentsatsen berknades utifrn antalet frekomster med knd status.
Source: Information provided by the Member States via WISE or in the river basin management plans. 
Klla: Information frn medlemsstaterna via WISE eller frn frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt.
Close follow-up by the Commission but improvements depend on Member Statesу willingness to act 47 The Commission is not responsible for approving the river basin management plans adopted by the Member States. Nevertheless, if a Member State fails to comply with EU law, the Commission has the power to initiate an infringement procedure and ultimately to refer the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union. 
Om en medlemsstat inte fljer EU-lagstiftningen har kommissionen trots det befogenhet att inleda ett vertrdelsefrfarande och i sista hand hnskjuta rendet till Europeiska unionens domstol. r 2008 infrde kommissionen det s kallade pilotfrfarandet som anvnds som ett frsta steg fr att frska lsa problem, s att formella vertrdelsefrfaranden om mjligt kan undvikas.
Observations 25 48 The Commission reviewed the 2009 river basin management plans of all Member States and presented specific observations and recommendations by Member State in two reports25 accompanying two Commission communications. 
Iakttagelser 25 48 Kommissionen granskade alla medlemsstaters frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009 och presenterade specifika iakttagelser och rekommendationer fr varje medlemsstat i tv rapporter25 som tfljde tv kommissionsmeddelanden.
The Commission also organised bilateral meetings in 2013 and 2014 with all four Member States where it addressed its main concerns. 
Kommissionen hll ocks bilatera mten 2013 och 2014 med alla fyra medlemsstaterna dr den tog upp sina viktigaste frgor.
49 In the context of the approval of the partnership agreements26 and the operational programmes on environment for the 2014-2020 programme period, the Commission assessed the тadoption of a river basin management planу as a criterion for fulfilment of an ex ante conditionality27. 
49 I samband med godknnandet av partnerskapsavtalen26 och de operativa programmen om miljn fr programperioden 2014Đ2020 bedmde kommissionen antagandet av frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt som ett kriterium fr att ett frhandsvillkor skulle vara uppfyllt27.
In the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia this criterion was not considered as having been fulfilled. 
I Tjeckien, Ungern och Slovakien ansgs inte detta kriterium ha uppfyllts.
The operational programmes include actions to be taken as a consequence, but they do not cover all weaknesses identified during the bilateral meetings for Hungary and Slovakia (see paragraph 48). 
De operativa programmen innehller tgrder som ska vidtas som en konsekvens av det, men de omfattar inte alla de brister som identifierades under de bilaterala mtena med Ungern och Slovakien (se punkt 48).
Instead the Commission considers the actions detailed in the minutes of these bilateral meetings as actions to be taken by Member States. 
I stllet betraktar kommissionen de tgrder som anges i protokollen frn dessa bilaterala mten som tgrder som medlemsstaterna ska vidta.
However, these minutes do not have the same contractual force as the operational programmes. Only for the Czech Republic was specific reference made in the operational programme28 to Commission requests made during the bilateral meeting. 
Men protokollen har inte samma bindande verkan som operativa program. Endast nr det gllde Tjeckien hnvisade man srskilt i det operativa programmet28 till de krav som kommissionen framfrde under det bilaterala mtet.
50 The draft 2015 river basin management plans still present a number of the shortcomings found by the Court and the Commission in the 2009 plans regarding the identification of suitable measures. Measures and instruments implemented by the Member States in order to reduce pollution caused by waste waters 51 The Court examined whether the measures and instruments as implemented in the four Member States are appropriate in addressing pollution from waste waters emitted by agglomerations and industrial installations. 
50 Utkasten till 2015 rs frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt innehller fortfarande flera av de brister som revisionsrtten och kommissionen konstaterade i planerna frn 2009 nr det gller identifiering av lmpliga tgrder. tgrder och instrument som medlemsstaterna har genomfrt fr att minska de froreningar som orsakas av avloppsvatten 51 Revisionsrtten granskade huruvida de tgrder och instrument som har genomfrts i de fyra medlemsstaterna r lmpliga fr att komma till rtta med froreningar frn avloppsvatten som ttorter och industrianlggningar slpper ut.
Pollution from agglomerations: progress in the treatment of waste water but available instruments could be used to better effect 52 An important way to reduce pollution from agglomerations for the four Member States was to increase the percentage of properly treated waste water. 
Frorening frn ttorter: framsteg i reningen av avloppsvatten, men tillgngliga instrument skulle kunna anvndas bttre 52 Ett viktigt stt att minska froreningen frn ttorter i de fyra medlemsstaterna var att ka andelen avloppsvatten som renas ordentligt.
Therefore the Court examined whether the four Member States: я had made progress with regard to the quantity of waste water that is properly treated; 25 SWD(2012) 379 final of 14 November 2012 тReports by Member States accompanying the report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the water framework directive (2000/60/EC) river basin management plansу and SWD(2015) 50 final of 9 March 2015 тReport on the progress in implementation of the water framework directive programmes of measures, accompanying the document рCommunication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the water framework directive and the floods directive: actions towards the тgood statusу of EU water and to reduce flood risksсу. 
Revisionsrtten granskade drfr huruvida de fyra medlemsstaterna Ń hade gjort framsteg i frga om den kvantitet avfallsvatten som renas ordentligt, 25 SWD(2012) 379 final, 14.11.2012, rapporter per medlemsstat som tfljer rapporten frn kommissionen till Europaparlamentet och rdet om genomfrandet av ramdirektivet fr vatten (2000/60/EG) Frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikten och SWD(2015) 50 final, 9.3.2015: rapport om framstegen i genomfrandet av ramdirektivet fr vatten och tgrdsprogrammen, som tfljer kommissionens meddelande till Europaparlamentet och rdet Ramdirektivet fr vatten och versvmningsdirektivet: tgrder fr att n Ógod statusÓ fr EU:s vatten och minska versvmningsriskerna.
26 A partnership agreement is a strategic plan negotiated between the Commission and the national authorities with investment priorities covering the European Structural and Investment Funds. 
26 Ett partnerskapsavtal r en strategisk plan som frhandlas fram av kommissionen och de nationella myndigheterna med investeringsprioriteringar som omfattar de europeiska struktur-och investeringsfonderna.
27 If ex ante conditionalities defined by EU regulations are not fulfilled, action plans need to be prepared to ensure fulfilment by 31.12.2016. 
27 Om de frhandsvillkor som faststlls i EU:s bestmmelser inte uppfylls mste handlingsplaner utarbetas fr att se till att de r uppfyllda senast den 31 december 2016.
28 The operational programme was approved in April 2015. 
28 Det operativa programmet godkndes i april 2015.
Observations 26 29 Final deadlines for implementation of the urban waste water treatment directive: the Czech Republic 31.12.2010, Hungary 31.12.2015, Romania 31.12.2018 and Slovakia 31.12.2015. я had an inspection system ensuring the enforcement of the emission limits set in the waste water discharge permits; я used the water pollution charge to be paid by urban waste water treatment plants as an instrument to deter the emission of pollutants. 
Iakttagelser 26 29 Slutgiltiga tidsfrister fr att genomfra direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse: Tjeckien 31.12.2010, Ungern 31.12.2015, Rumnien 31.12.2018 och Slovakien 31.12.2015. Ń hade ett inspektionssystem som sg till att de utslppsgrnsvrden som faststllts i utslppstillstnden fljs, Ń anvnde den vattenfroreningsavgift som anlggningar fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse ska betala som ett instrument fr att avskrcka frn frorenande utslpp.