natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
40 In the Czech Republic the load complying with the limits for Ptot is even higher: 97 %. 
40 I Tjeckien r den belastning som fljer grnsvrdena fr Ptot nnu hgre, nmligen 97%.
41 Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/ EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy (OJ L 226, 24.8.2013, p. 
41 Europaparlamentets och rdets direktiv 2013/39/EU av den 12 augusti 2013 om ndring av direktiven 2000/60/EG och 2008/105/EG vad gller prioriterade mnen p vattenpolitikens omrde (EUT L 226, 24.8.2013, s.
Observations 32 Deterrent effect of the inspection system is limited 71 Properly set emission limits will only have an impact on water quality if they are complied with. 
Iakttagelser 32 Tillsynssystemets avskrckande effekt r begrnsad 71 Korrekt faststllda utslppsgrnsvrden fr effekt p vattenkvaliteten bara om de fljs.
Hence the importance of an effective inspection system42 to ensure that the limits specified in the waste water discharge permits for urban waste water treatment plants are being adhered to. 
Drfr r det viktigt med ett ndamlsenligt tillsynssystem42 s att man kan se till att de grnsvrden som anges i utslppstillstnden fr anlggningar fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse fljs.
72 Compliance is ensured by two types of checks: я those carried out by the operators of the treatment plants on the basis of water samples drawn by themselves (hereafter referred to as self-checks); я those carried out by public inspection bodies43. 
72 Efterlevnaden ska garanteras genom fljande tv typer av kontroller: Ń De som utfrs av anlggningsope-ratrerna utifrn de vattenprover som de sjlva tar (nedan kallade egenkontroller). Ń De som utfrs av offentliga tillsynsorgan43.
74 With regard to the checks carried out by public inspection bodies, their frequency is not prescribed in any of the four Member States45. 
74 Inte i ngon av de fyra medlemsstaterna freskrivs det antal kontroller som de offentliga tillsynsmyndigheterna ska utfra45.
The actual frequency achieved varies by Member State (see Table 6). 
Det faktiska antalet kontroller som genomfrts varierar mellan medlemsstaterna (se tabell 6).
For the Member States that submitted data to the Court, Slovakia carried out checks least often. 
Bland de lnder som lmnade uppgifter till revisionsrtten genomfrde Slovakien kontroller mest sllan.
No data on frequency was received from Hungary. In Slovakia, the inspection body rarely takes its own samples of the effluent, relying instead on operatorsу self-checks carried out by accredited laboratories. 
Frn Ungern fick vi inga uppgifter om kontrollfrekvensen. I Slovakien tar tillsynsorganet sllan egna prover p spillvattnet utan frlitar sig i stllet p operatrernas egenkontroller som utfrs av ackrediterade laboratorier.
75 When emission limits are exceeded and this is observed by the public inspection bodies, fines46 are due according to the national legal provisions in all four Member States. 
75 Nr utslppsgrnsvrden verskrids och det konstateras av de offentliga tillsynsorganen utgr bter46 enligt den nationella lagstiftningen i alla fyra medlemsstaterna.
76 In Hungary and Romania the fines are applied per pollutant for which the limit was exceeded. 
76 I Ungern och Rumnien tillmpas bterna per frorenande mne fr vilket grnsvrdet verskridits.
The amount per kg of pollution in excess of the limit varies by pollutant47 concerned. In Romania, the seriousness of the offence is also assessed so that the inspection body can opt for issuing a warning rather than a fine. 
Beloppen per kilo frorening som verskrider grnsvrdet varierar mellan de frorenande mnena47. I Rumnien bedms ocks hur allvarlig vertrdelsen r s att tillsynsorganet kan vlja att utfrda en varning i stllet fr bter.
The Romanian statistics on the results of the 2012 inspections show that five times more warnings than fines were issued. 
Rumniens statistik ver resultaten av 2012 rs kontroller visar att fem gnger s mnga varningar som bter utfrdades.
42 At EU level there is Recommendation 2001/331/ EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections in the Member States (OJ L 118, 27.4.2001, p. 
42 P EU-niv finns Europaparlamentets och rdets rekommendation 2001/331/EG av den 4 april 2001 om infrande av minimikriterier fr miljtillsyn i medlemsstaterna (EGT L 118, 27.4.2001, s.
It provides guidelines for the organisation (establishment of inspection plans) and the carrying out of checks (site visits and reporting). 
Den innehller riktlinjer fr att organisera (upprttande av miljtillsynsplaner) och utfra kontroller (inspektion p plats och rapportering).
43 These bodies are the following: in the Czech Republic: the Czech Environmental Inspectorate (CZIP), in Hungary: the National Directorate General for Disaster Management of the Ministry of the Interior (since April 2014), in Romania: the National Administration тRomanian Watersу (ANAR), in Slovakia: the Slovak Environmental Inspectorate (SZIP). 
43 Dessa organ r fljande: i Tjeckien: Tjeckiens milj-inspektion (CZIP); i Ungern: det nationella generaldirektoratet fr katastrofhantering vid inrikesministeriet (sedan april 2014); i Rumnien: Rumniens nationella vattenfrvaltning (ANAR); i Slovakien: Slovakiens miljtillsynsmyndighet (SZIP).
Other bodies may also carry out checks at the level of the waste water treatment plants such as the authorities which establish the permit. 
Andra organ kan ocks utfra kontroller p anlggningarna fr rening av avloppsvatten, t.ex. de myndigheter som utfrdar tillstndet.
These checks were not included in the Courtуs assessment. 
Dessa kontroller ingick inte i revisionsrttens bedmning.
44 See Special Report No 2/2015, paragraphs 48 and 50. 
44 Se punkterna 48 och 50 i srskild rapport nr 2/2015.
45 Council conclusions of 11 June 2012 called for an improvement of inspections and an opinion of the Committee of the Regions stressed that an EU-wide framework for national inspections can ensure a level playing field and consistency in legal action. 
45 I rdets slutsatser av den 11 juni 2012 pekade man p behovet av bttre tillsyn, och i ett yttrande frn Regionkommittn betonades att en EU-ram fr nationell tillsyn kan skra lika villkor vid rttsliga tgrder.
46 Sanctions under criminal law (such as prison sentences) are not addressed in this report. 
46 Straffrttsliga pfljder (t.ex. fngelsestraff) behandlas inte i denna rapport.
47 For example in Hungary the amount per kg of pollution (converted from HUF at the exchange rate of 31.12.2014: 315.54) is 1.11 euro for Ntot and 7.29 euro for Ptot. 
47 Till exempel i Ungern r beloppet per kilo frorening (omvandlat frn forint till vxelkursen den 31 december 2014: 315,54) 1,11 euro fr Ntot och 7,29 euro fr Ptot.
In Romania, the amount per kg of pollution (converted from RON at the exchange rate of 31.12.2014: 4.4828) is 1.71 euro for Ntot and Ptot. 
I Rumnien r beloppet per kilo frorening (omvandlat frn rumnska leu till vxelkursen den 31 december 2014: 4,4828) 1,71 euro fr Ntot och Ptot.
Observations 33 Checks by public inspection bodies Member State Actual frequency of the checks on urban waste water treatment plants Czech Republic Plants with capacity above 10 000 p.e.: once per year. 
Iakttagelser 33 Kontroller som utfrs av offentliga tillsynsorgan Medlemsstat Faktiskt antal kontroller av anlggningar fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse Tjeckien Anlggningar med en kapacitet ver 10 000 pe: en gng om ret.
Plants with capacity between 2 000 and 10 000 p.e.: once every 3 years. 
Anlggningar med en kapacitet mellan 2 000 och 10 000 pe: vart tredje r. vriga anlggningar: vart femte r.
Hungary No information received. 
Ungern Inga uppgifter.
On the basis of the frequency observed at a sample of seven waste water treatment plants, the Court concludes that plants are not necessarily inspected every year. 
Utifrn den frekvens som vi observerade fr ett urval av sju anlggningar fr rening av avloppsvatten drar vi slutsatsen att anlggningarna inte ndvndigtvis kontrolleras varje r.
Romania In 2013 all plants with a capacity Ё 2 000 p.e. were checked. 
Rumnien r 2013 kontrollerades alla anlggningar med en kapacitet ł 2 000 pe.
Slovakia Plants with capacity above 10 000 p.e.: coverage less than 10 % in 2013. 
Slovakien Anlggningar med en kapacitet ver 10 000 pe: mindre n 10 % av dem kontrollerades 2013.
All plants taken together: coverage less than 12 % in 2013. 
Alla anlggningar sammantagna: mindre n 12 % av dem kontrollerades 2013.
Source: ECA analysis of national legislation and data received by inspection bodies. 
Klla: Revisionsrttens analys av nationell lagstiftning och uppgifter frn tillsynsorgan.
77 In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, the fine does not depend on the pollutant concerned or the amount of pollution in excess of the limit. 
77 I Tjeckien och Slovakien r btesbeloppet inte avhngigt av det aktuella frorenande mnet eller den mngd froreningar som verskrider grnsvr-det.
78 None of the 2009 river basin management plans included a measure aimed at assessing the effectiveness and deterrent effect of the inspection system. 
78 Ingen av frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 2009 innehll en tgrd fr att bedma tillsynssystemets ndamlsenlighet och avskrckande effekt.
Water pollution charge partially used as an instrument to deter the emission of pollutants 79 The legal framework of all four Member States provides for the application of a water pollution charge, to be paid by those discharging polluted water. 
Vattenfroreningsavgiften anvndes delvis som ett instrument fr att avskrcka frn utslpp av frorenande mnen 79 Lagstiftningen i alla fyra medlemsstaterna freskriver att vattenfroreningsavgift kan tas ut av dem som slpper ut frorenat vatten.
It is based on the quantity and/or concentration (mg/l) of the discharged pollutants. 
Den grundas p de utslppta froreningarnas mngd och/ eller koncentration (mg/l).
Such a charge is in line with the тpolluter paysу principle49 according to which polluters have to bear the cost of reducing the pollution caused. 
En sdan avgift verensstmmer med principen att frorenaren betalar49, enligt vilken frorenare mste st fr kostnaderna fr att minska de froreningar som de har orsakat.
A water pollution charge can serve three purposes: (i) to raise money, (ii) to be an incentive to comply with the emission limits set in the dischargersу permits and/or (iii) to act as an incentive to further reduce pollution by going beyond the set limits. 
En vattenfroreningsavgift kan tjna tre syften: i) samla in pengar, ii) vara ett incitament att flja de utslppsgrnsvrden som faststllts i de tillstnd som utfrdas till utslppare av avloppsvatten och/eller iii) fungera som incitament att minska froreningarna ytterligare genom att g lngre n de grnsvrden som faststllts.
48 In the Czech Republic the fine for non-compliance with permit conditions can be up to 180 278 euro (converted from CZK at the exchange rate of 31.12.2014: 27.735). 
48 I Tjeckien kan btesbeloppet fr bristande efterlevnad av tillstndsvillkoren uppg till 180 278 euro (omvandlat frn tjeckiska kronor till vxelkursen den 31 december 2014: 27,735).
In Slovakia the fine for non-compliance with permit conditions can range from 1 000 euro to three times the annual water pollution charge or 1 euro per m3 discharged over a maximum period of 1 year. 
I Slovakien kan bterna fr bristande efterlevnad av tillstndsvillkoren uppg till mellan 1 000 euro och tre gnger den rliga vattenfroreningsavgiften eller en euro per m3 som slppts ut under en period p hgst ett r.
49 Article 191(2) of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version). 
49 Artikel 191.2 i frdraget om Europeiska unionens funktionsstt (konsoliderad version).
Observations 34 80 The charge to be paid for the discharge of waste water into surface water is limited to a number of pollutants (see Annex IV). 
Iakttagelser 34 80 Den avgift som ska betalas fr utslpp av avloppsvatten i ytvatten r begrnsad till ett antal frorenande mnen (se bilaga IV).
With regard to organic pollution, no charge is due for BOD5 in three of the four Member States. 
Nr det gller organisk frorening tar tre av de fyra medlemsstaterna inte ut ngon avgift fr BOD .
84 Industrial installations can discharge their waste water either directly into water courses or indirectly via a public sewage network for treatment by an urban waste water treatment plant. 
84 Industrianlggningar kan slppa ut sitt avloppsvatten direkt i vattendrag eller indirekt via ett offentligt avloppsnt s att det renas vid en anlggning fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse.
85 According to the industrial emissions directive (see Table 1), industrial installations carrying out defined activities57 must have a permit to operate their installation. 
85 Enligt direktivet om industriutslpp (se tabell 1) mste industrianlggningar som bedriver angivna aktiviteter57 ha tillstnd att driva anlggningen.
These limits should not exceed the emission levels associated with the тbest available techniquesу as adopted by the Commission, assisted by an expert committee. 
Tillstnden ska inte verskrida de utslppsgrnser som motsvarar bsta tillgngliga teknik, i enlighet med vad kommissionen, bitrdd av en expertkommitt, antagit.
As of November 2015, seven such тconclusions on best available techniquesу were adopted. 
I november 2015 hade sju sdana Óslut-satser om bsta tillgngliga teknikÓ antagits.
Urban waste water treatment plants, in principle, do not fall under the scope of this directive. 
Anlggningar fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse omfattas i princip inte av detta direktiv.
50 In practice this means that only around 30 % of dischargers in Slovakia are under charge obligation. 
50 I praktiken innebr det att endast omkring 30 % av utslpparna i Slovakien r skyldiga att betala en avgift.
51 In the Czech Republic a charge is also due for the volume of waste water discharged where such volume exceeds 100 000m3/year and this charge is independent of the degree of pollution in the waste water. 
51 I Tjeckien tas ocks en avgift ut fr den volym avloppsvatten som slpps ut om den verstiger 100 000 m3/r. Avgiften r oberoende av avloppsvattnets froreningsgrad.
52 The thresholds relate to (i) the volume of the pollution (in kg/ year) and (ii) the concentration of the pollutant in the discharged water (in mg/l). 
52 Trskelvrdena gller i) frore-ningsvolymen (i kg/r) och ii) froreningshalten i det utslppta vattnet (i mg/l).
The thresholds are such that in the Czech Republic plants with a capacity above 10 000 p.e. are unlikely to pay a charge for Ptot and for Ninorg and in Slovakia plants equal to or above 2 000 p.e. are unlikely to pay a charge for total suspended solids (TSSs) and plants above 10 000 p.e. are unlikely to pay a charge for Ntot and Ptot. 
Trskelvrdena r sdana att det i Tjeckien r osannolikt att anlggningar med en kapacitet ver 10 000 pe betalar en avgift fr Ptot och Ninorg, medan det i Slovakien r osannolikt att anlggningar med minst 2 000 pe betalar en avgift fr den totala mngden suspenderade mnen (TSS) och att anlggningar ver 10 000 pe betalar en avgift fr Ntot och Ptot.
53 A charge is always due in the case of discharge into groundwater. 
53 En avgift ska alltid betalas vid utslpp i grundvattnet.
54 For the Czech Republic the river basin management plans state that it would be advisable to evaluate the effectiveness of the charging system. 
54 I Tjeckiens frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt anges att det vore tillrdligt att utvrdera avgiftssystemets ndamlsenlighet.
Document PE 536.369 published in May 2015. 
Dokument PE 536.369 som offentliggjordes i maj 2015.
56 A study of the European Parliamentary Research Service on тWater legislation, cost of non-Europe reportу notes that тemission controls foreseen by the water framework directive would need to be introduced to improve the control of industrial chemicals [...] in waterу. 
56 I studien Water Legislation: Cost of Non-Europe Report (rapport om kostnaderna om EU inte fortstter att vidta tgrder p vattenlagstiftningsomrdet) frn Europaparlamentets utredningstjnst sgs bland annat att den utslppsreglering som freskrivs i ramdirektivet fr vatten skulle behva tillmpas fr att frbttra regleringen av industrikemikalier i vatten.
57 The directive covers inter alia the energy industries, the production and processing of metals and the mineral, chemical and waste management industries. 
57 Direktivet omfattar bland annat industrier inom energisektorn, produktion och omvandling av metaller och mineralindustrin, den kemiska industrin och avfallshanteringsindustrin.
81 Generally all urban waste water treatment plants are liable to pay a water pollution charge with the exception of smaller dischargers50 in Slovakia (discharging less than 10 000m3/year or 1 000m3/month). 
81 I regel r alla anlggningar fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse skyldiga att betala vattenfroreningsavgift med undantag av mindre ut-slppare50 i Slovakien (som slpper ut mindre n 10 000 m3/r eller 1 000 m3/ mnad).
Nevertheless, я in the Czech Republic51 and Slovakia no charge by pollutant is due below certain thresholds52 set by law; я in Romania, no charge by pollutant is due when the effluent is less polluted than the receiving surface water body53. 
Trots det Ń tar man i Tjeckien51 och Slovakien inte ut ngon avgift per frorenande mne under vissa trskelvrden52 som faststllts i lagstiftningen, Ń tar man i Rumnien inte ut ngon avgift per frorenande mne nr avloppsvattnet r mindre frorenat n den ytvattenfrekomst som r recipient53.
This will for example favour those that discharge into water bodies with a high degree of pollution. 82 The 2009 river basin management plans54 did not include measures to assess the appropriateness of the charge amounts55. 
Det gynnar t.ex. dem som slpper ut avloppsvatten i vattenfrekomster med hga halter av froreningar. 82 Frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt frn 200954 innehll inga tgrder fr att bedma avgiftsbeloppens ndamlsenlighet55.
Observations 35 86 The Court examined whether in the four Member States visited: я there was a procedure for setting emission limits; я an inspection system was in place to ensure the enforcement of the limits; я the water pollution charge to be paid by industrial installations was used as an instrument to deter the emission of pollutants. 
Iakttagelser 35 86 Revisionsrtten granskade huruvida de fyra medlemsstaterna Ń hade en process fr att faststlla utslppsgrnsvrden, Ń hade infrt ett tillsynssystem fr att se till att grnsvrdena inte verskreds, Ń anvnde den vattenfroreningsavgift som industrianlggningar ska betala som ett instrument fr att avskrcka frn utslpp av frorenande mnen.
It was mainly in the permits of the 12 Romanian urban waste water treatment plants examined that the Court found more substances than are required by the urban waste water treatment directive (see Annex III). 
Det var huvudsakligen i tillstnden fr de tolv granskade rumnska anlggningarna fr rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse som revisionsrtten fann fler mnen n vad som faststlls i direktivet om rening av avloppsvatten frn ttbebyggelse (se bilaga III).
For those substances where the national legislation either sets limits only for guidance (the Czech Republic and Slovakia) or does not set any limits (see examples in Annex V), the agreed emission limits depend on the negotiation power of the parties involved. 
Fr de mnen dr den nationella lagstiftningen antingen endast anger vgledande grnsvrden (Tjeckien och Slovakien) eller inte faststller ngra grnsvrden alls (se exempel i bilaga V) avgrs de utslppsgrnsvrden som man kommer verens om av de berrda parternas frhandlingsstyrka.
58 If an industrial installation falling under the industrial emissions directive discharges into a public sewage system the limits should be set according to the permit given as a result of the application of this directive. 
58 Om en industrianlggning som omfattas av direktivet om industriutslpp gr sina utslpp direkt till ett offentligt avloppsnt ska grnsvrdena faststllas i enlighet med det tillstnd som getts som resultat av att detta direktiv tillmpas.
Observations 36 92 Hungary and Slovakia included the review of existing permits or of the permit issuance procedure as measures in their river basin management plans. 
Iakttagelser 36 92 Ungern och Slovakien tog med versyn av gllande tillstnd eller av frfarandet fr utfrdande av tillstnd som tgrder i sina frvaltningsplaner fr avrinningsdistrikt.
The Czech Republic had a measure which referred merely to the use of best available techniques. 
Tjeckien hade en tgrd som endast hnvisade till anvndningen av bsta tillgngliga teknik.
In the case of Hungary, the scope of the measure was not indicated. 
I Ungerns fall angavs inte tgrdens omfattning.
In addition, there is no database in Hungary for water discharge permits issued for industrial companies not falling under the industrial emissions directive, thereby restricting any comprehensive review exercise. 
I Ungern finns det dessutom ingen databas ver utslppstillstnd som utfrdats till industrifretag som inte omfattas av direktivet om industriutslpp, vilket frsvrar en omfattande versyn.
In Slovakia the Court identified shortcomings regarding the review of the permits of two installations examined. 
I Slovakien konstaterade revisionsrtten brister i versynen av tillstnden fr tv granskade anlggningar.
Weaknesses in the inspection system 93 Compliance with emission limits is ensured in two ways: self-checks carried out by the dischargers of waste water and checks carried out by public inspection bodies. 
Brister i tillsynssystemet 93 Efterlevnad av utslppsgrnsvrden skerstlls p tv stt: genom egenkontroller som utslpparna av avloppsvatten gr och genom kontroller som offentliga tillsynsorgan gr.
94 In the four Member States visited, industrial installations discharging directly into surface water are obliged by law to carry out self-checks on their effluent59. 
94 I de fyra medlemsstater som vi beskte r industrianlggningar som slpper ut avloppsvatten direkt i ytvatten skyldiga enligt lag att gra egenkontroller av sina utslpp59.
The frequency of these self-checks is generally indicated in the waste water discharge permit. 
Hur ofta dessa egenkontroller ska utfras anges i regel i utslppstillstndet.
In Hungary, Romania and Slovakia national legislation provides the yearly minimum number of checks. 
I Ungern, Rumnien och Slovakien faststlls i lagstiftningen hur mnga kontroller som minst ska gras varje r.
95 For checks carried out by public inspection bodies, their frequency is not provided for in any of the four Member States, the only exception being checks on industrial installations falling under the industrial emissions directive. 
95 Inte i ngon av de fyra medlemsstaterna freskrivs antalet kontroller som de offentliga tillsynsmyndigheterna ska utfra; enda undantag r kontroller av industrianlggningar som omfattas av direktivet om industriutslpp.
For such checks, the directive specifies the minimum frequency required. 
I direktivet anges hur ofta sdana kontroller minst ska genomfras.