natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
SCOPE AND APPROACH OF THE PERFORMANCE REVIEW Scope and objective 11. 
EFFEKTIVITETSREVISIONENS INRIKTNING OCH OMFATTNING SAMT REVISIONSMETOD Inriktning och omfattning samt ml 11.
Additionally, this responded to an interest shown by the European Parliament. 9 10 11 12 13 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union (OJ L 341, 24.12.2015, p. 
Kvaliteten p de rttsliga avgrandena och den pgende reformen av tribunalen ingick inte i 9 10 11 12 Europaparlamentets och rdets frordning (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422 av den 16 december 2015 om ndring av protokoll nr 3 om stadgan fr Europeiska unionens domstol (EUT L 341, 24.12.2015, s.
The Council observed that on average it took the General Court two years to issue a judgment, twice as long as what was generally considered permissible (Council of the European Union, Press Release No 497/15, 23.6.2015). 
Rdet konstaterade att det i genomsnitt tog tv r fr tribunalen att meddela dom, dubbelt s lng tid jmfrt med vad som allmnt anses godtagbart (Europeiska unionens rd, pressmeddelande nr 497/15, 23.6.2015).
See also the recitals to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422, in particular recital 2: ŇAt present, the duration of proceedings does not appear to be acceptable from the point of view of litigants, particularly in the light of the requirements set out in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental FreedomsÓ. 
Se ven ingressen till frordning (EU, Euratom) 2015/2422, srskilt skl 2: ÓI nulget frefaller handlggningstiderna inte vara godtagbara ur de rttsskandes synvinkel, framfr allt inte mot bakgrund av kraven i artikel 47 i Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundlggande rttigheterna och artikel 6 i Europeiska konventionen om skydd fr de mnskliga rttigheterna och de grundlggande friheternaÓ.
Council of the European Union, document 16576/14, 8.12.2014, paragraph 10, and Press Release No 497/15, 23.6.2015. 
Europeiska unionens rd, dokument 16576/14, 8.12.2014, punkt 10, och pressmeddelande nr 497/15, 23.6.2015.
COM(2016) 81 final of 22.2.2016, paragraph 10. 
COM(2016) 81 final, 22.2.2016, punkt 10.
Council documents No 16576/14, 8.12.2014, paragraph 5 and No 9375/1/15 REV 1 ADD 1, 24.6.2015, paragraph 15. 
Rdets dokument nr 16576/14, 8.12.2014, punkt 5 och nr 9375/1/15 REV 1 ADD 1, 24.6.2015, punkt 15.
We examined a sample of closed cases (see paragraphs 17 to 19), the roles and the activities of the different actors involved throughout the case management lifecycle. 
Vi underskte ett urval av avslutade ml (se punkterna 17Đ19) och de olika aktrernas roller och verksamhet genom hela livscykeln fr mlets handlggning.
We requested access to all case documents, and planned to complement this documentary examination by interviews with staff dealing with case management, including legal secretaries (hereafter referred to as ŇrfrendairesÓ) (see paragraph 23). 
Vi begrde tillgng till alla handlingar i mlen och planerade att komplettera dokumentgranskningen med intervjuer med personal som skter handlggningen av ml, inbegripet rttssekreterare (se punkt 23).
The CJEU considered that due to the Treaty obligation to maintain the secrecy of the deliberative process14, access to certain documents (such as the internal notes and memoranda between the Registry and the Judges/Advocates-General or between the Judges/Advocates-General, and certain parts of the JudgeŐs preliminary reports) should remain restricted to the Judges, Advocates-General and selected CJEU staff and not be available to the European Court of Auditors (ECA). 
EU-domstolen ansg att p grund av frdragsskyldigheten om sekretess i verlggningsprocessen14 mste tillgngen till vissa handlingar (ssom interna meddelanden och pm mellan kansliet och domarna/generaladvokaterna eller mellan domarna/generaladvokaterna samt vissa delar av domarens frberedande rapporter) frbli begrnsad till domarna, generaladvokaterna och utvald personal inom EU-domstolen, och dessa handlingar kunde inte gras tillgngliga fr revisionsrtten.
We could not therefore independently assess the impact of factors, such as complexity of the cases and the resources available, on the parts of the case management process related to these documents. 
Vi kunde drfr inte gra en oberoende bedmning av inverkan av sdana faktorer som komplexiteten i mlen och tillgngliga resurser nr det gllde de delar av handlggningen som dessa handlingar avsg.
In order to mitigate this restriction, this review is based on information gathered through management representations15 of the CJEU rather than from direct evidence. 
Fr att mildra effekterna av denna begrnsning har granskningen baserats p information som inhmtats i form av uttalanden frn ledningen15 vid EU-domstolen snarare n p direkta bevis.
In particular, for the sample of cases the review made use of questionnaires to obtain information on case management from the staff involved. 
Framfr allt anvnde vi fr urvalet av ml frgeformulr fr att f information om handlggningen av mlen frn berrd personal.
These questionnaires addressed the most relevant factors influencing the time taken to process a case. 
Frgeformulren tog upp de mest relevanta faktorer som pverkar tidstgngen fr att behandla ett ml.
These factors have been identified in consultation with the Registries and the Cabinets of the Presidents of the Courts of the CJEU16. 
har identifierats i samrd med kanslierna och ordfrandenas kabinett inom EU-domstolen16.
We also interviewed a number of Judges and Advocates-General. 
Vi intervjuade ven ett antal domare och generaladvokater.
Approach and criteria 15. 
Metod och kriterier 15.
We took into account the guidelines on efficiency and time management developed by the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) working in the area of human rights and rule of law within the Council of Europe17. 
Vi tog i beaktande de riktlinjer om effektivitet och tidsfrvaltning som tagits fram av Europardets kommission fr effektivisering av rttsvsendet (Cepej) som verkar inom omrdet mnskliga rttigheter och rttsskerhet17.
We analysed the duration of the key steps of about 2.800 cases closed by the Court of Justice and the General Court in 2014 and 2015, representing 90 % of all the cases closed in that period. 
Vi analyserade tidstgngen fr viktiga steg i omkring 2 800 ml som avslutats av domstolen och tribunalen 2014 och 2015, vilket motsvarar 90 % av alla avslutade ml under den perioden.
We also analysed the correlation between factors we considered to contribute to case complexity and the length of the judicial procedures. 
Vi analyserade ocks sambandet mellan faktorer som vi ansg bidrog till mlens komplexitet och lngden p de rttsliga frfarandena.
To assess the efficiency of case management in individual cases, we tried to identify factors having a positive or negative impact on the case management processes and on the length of the procedures. 
Fr att bedma effektiviteten i handlggningen av enskilda ml frskte vi identifiera faktorer med positiv eller negativ inverkan p handlggningsprocesserna och lngden p frfarandena.
To do so, we selected a sample of cases (30 cases for each Court) closed in 2014 and 2015. 
Fr att gra det valde vi ut ett urval av ml (30 ml frn vardera domstol) som avslutades 2014 och 2015.
The sample was drawn with the purpose of covering different characteristics of the population18. 
Urvalet gjordes med syftet att tcka in olika egenskaper hos populationen18.
The longest19 and shortest cases were excluded. It mainly comprised cases taking slightly more time than the average duration, together with a number of cases with short processing time with a view to identifying possible best practices (see Annex I). 
De lngsta19 och kortaste mlen uteslts, i huvudsak ml som tagit ngot lngre tid n genomsnittet och ett antal ml med kort handlggningstid, med syftet att identifiera mjlig bsta praxis (se bilaga I).
For these reasons, this is not a random representative sample, but targeted to particular issues. 
Av dessa skl r det inte ett slumpmssigt representativt urval, utan ett riktat urval fr srskilda frgestllningar.
We examined the 60 cases throughout their entire lifecycle (see Figure 3). 
Vi underskte de 60 mlen genom hela deras livscykel (se figur 3).
For the steps from the lodging of the case to the end of the written procedure, we analysed internal procedures, documents of the Registry related to the selected cases and the questionnaires completed by the Registry, and we held interviews with relevant staff in those services. 
Fr stegen frn mlets anhngiggrande till avslutandet av det skriftliga frfarandet analyserade vi interna frfaranden, kansliets handlingar rrande de utvalda mlen samt de frgeformulr som fyllts i av kansliet, och vi gjorde intervjuer med berrd personal inom dessa tjnsteavdelningar.
For the steps after the written procedure, we examined documents made available to us subject to the limitation described in paragraph 13 and the questionnaires completed by the Judges/Advocates-General or their rfrendaires. 
Fr stegen efter det skriftliga frfarandet granskade vi de handlingar som vi fick tillgng till, med den begrnsning som beskrivs i punkt 13, samt de frgeformulr som fyllts i av domarna/generaladvokaterna eller deras rttssekreterare.
In addition, we analysed the information included in the judgments and orders, and held several meetings with staff of the Cabinets of both Presidents to obtain explanations and procedural descriptions on systems21. 
Dessutom analyserade vi informationen i domarna och besluten och hll flera mten med personalen vid de bda ordfrandenas kabinett fr att f frklaringar och handhavandebeskrivningar av system21.
For the support services to the judicial process (translation, IT, research and documentation), we analysed the systems in place and held interviews with the responsible staff. 
Nr det gller stdtjnsterna till rttsprocessen (versttning, it, forskning och dokumentation) analyserade vi de system som anvnds och gjorde intervjuer med ansvarig personal.
For the translation service, we reviewed in particular the procedures for setting deadlines, planning and reporting on performance. 
Fr versttningstjnsten granskade vi framfr allt frfaranden fr att faststlla tidsfrister, planering och resultatrapportering.
We also reviewed progress in applying the Key Inter-institutional Activity and Performance Indicators (KIAPI). 
Vi granskade ven framstegen i tillmpningen av de centrala interinstitutionella verksamhets-och resultatindikatorerna (Kiapi).
For IT, we examined the general architecture of systems for case management and the strategic planning for 2016-2020. 
P it-omrdet granskade vi den allmnna systemarkitekturen fr handlggningen av ml och den strategiska planeringen fr 2016Đ2020.
In addition, we examined whether the CJEU had assessed if there was any efficiency gain potentially resulting from a change of its language practices. 
Dessutom underskte vi huruvida EU-domstolen hade bedmt om det kunde finnas ngra potentiella effektivitetsvinster med en frndring av dess sprkliga praxis.
18 20 21 It should be noted that when a case is formally suspended (six in the sample, all of which at the General Court), the duration of the formal suspension is excluded from the CJEUŐs duration calculation and was similarly excluded from our analysis. 
18 20 21 Det br noteras att nr ett ml frklaras vilande (sex ml i urvalet, varav alla vid tribunalen) undantas den tid d mlet r formellt vilandefrklarat frn EU-domstolens berkning av handlggningstiden. P samma stt undantogs den tiden frn vr analys.
As indicated in paragraph 14, this was complemented by a number of interviews with Judges in each Court and Advocates-General at the Court of Justice. 
Ssom anges i punkt 14 kompletterades detta av ett antal intervjuer med domare vid de bda domstolarna och generaladvokater vid domstolen.
OBSERVATIONS The process of case management and its duration 22. 
IAKTTAGELSER Frfarandet fr handlggning av ml och tidstgngen fr det 22.
As shown by Figure 3, cases are received and are initially handled by the Registries in both the Court of Justice and in the General Court. 
Ssom visas i figur 3 tas mlen emot och hanteras frst av kanslierna i bde domstolen och tribunalen.
The course of the first part of the procedure (the written procedure) is laid down in detail in the Rules of Procedure of each of the two Courts, which specify in particular the documents concerned and the applicable time-frames. 
Gngen fr den frsta delen av frfarandet (det skriftliga frfarandet) faststlls i detalj i de tv domstolarnas respektive rttegngsregler, dr det bland annat finns uppgifter om relevanta handlingar och tillmpliga tidsramar.
The cases are assigned by the Presidents of the two Courts to Chambers and/or to Reporting Judges and, in the case of the Court of Justice, the First Advocate-General assigns the case to an Advocate-General. 
Mlen frdelas av ordfrandena fr de bda domstolarna till avdelningar och/eller till referenter, och i frga om domstolen frdelar frste generaladvokaten mlet till en generaladvokat.
The Judges and Advocates-General work on the cases assigned directly to them but also they analyse other cases at the level of the Chamber to which they belong or of the Court. 
Domarna och generaladvokaterna arbetar med de ml som tilldelats dem direkt men de analyserar ven andra ml som behandlas av den avdelning de tillhr eller av domstolen som helhet.
Judges may have responsibility for cases where they have the role of Reporting Judge, Assessing Judge or, where appropriate, President of a Chamber. 
Domare kan ha ansvar fr ml dr de har rollen som referent, bisittare eller, i frekommande fall, ordfrande fr en avdelning.
They are assisted in the performance of their duties by their Cabinet staff: rfrendaires and assistants. 
De bitrds i utfrandet av sina uppgifter av sin kabinettspersonal: rttssekreterare och assistenter.
Each Cabinet consists of three rfrendaires for Judges and four for Advocates-General. 
Varje kabinett bestr av tre rttssekreterare fr domare och fyra fr generaladvokater.
Rfrendaires have a key role in supporting the Judges and Advocates-General in cases for which they are responsible, as well as in assisting in the preparation of the general meetings or Chamber conferences and providing analysis on other cases which are dealt with in the Chambers to which the Judge is assigned. 
Rttssekreterarna har en nyckelroll som std fr domarna och generaladvokaterna i de ml de ansvarar fr men ocks i arbetet med att frbereda allmnna sammantrden eller avdelningssammantrden och tillhandahlla analyser om andra ml som behandlas av de avdelningar som domarna hr till.
The quality, management and availability of these resources are therefore important factors in ensuring efficient case management. 
Kvaliteten p, frvaltningen av och tillgngen till dessa resurser r drfr viktiga faktorer fr att garantera en effektiv handlggning.
In general, for each case one rfrendaire is designated for the entire case lifecycle, including assisting in the drafting of preliminary reports, opinions and judicial decisions. 
I varje ml utses i allmnhet en rttssekreterare fr mlets hela livscykel, i vars uppdrag det ingr att bist vid utarbetandet av frberedande rapporter, frslag till avgranden och domar och beslut.
As a result, interruptions in the availability of a rfrendaire may impact adversely on the efficient processing of cases. 
Som en fljd drav kan avbrott i en rttsekreterares tillgnglighet inverka negativt p effektiviteten i handlggningen av ml.
After assignment of the case and completion of the written procedure, a preliminary report22 is drafted and subsequently presented by the Reporting Judge (at the General Court 22 19 The preparation of the preliminary report follows in principle the translation of most of the procedural documents into French, the only deliberation language of the CJEU. The last 
Efter att mlet frdelats och det skriftliga frfarandet har avslutats ska en frberedande rapport22 utarbetas och sedan presenteras av referenten (vid tribunalen kompletteras den 22 19 Den frberedande rapporten utarbetas i princip efter att merparten av rttegngshandlingarna versatts till franska som r EU-domstolens enda verlggningssprk. Den sista rttegngshandlingen verstts i allmnhet inom tv mnader efter att det skriftliga frfarandet har avslutats.
this is complemented by a report for the hearing). 
med en frhandlingsrapport).
This is discussed at the general meeting of the Court of Justice or at the conference of the General CourtŐs Chamber. 
Rapporten diskuteras vid domstolens allmnna sammantrde eller vid tribunalens avdelningssammantrde.
The next steps in the lifecycle of the case are the hearing23 (which can be omitted under certain conditions24) and, for many cases in the Court of Justice25, the issuance of the Advocate-GeneralŐs opinion. 
Nsta steg i mlens livscykel r frhandlingen23 (som kan utelmnas under vissa frhllanden24) och, fr mnga av mlen vid domstolen25, utarbetandet av generaladvokatens frslag till avgrande.
The draft judgments and, in some cases, the draft orders are subject to the review of a team of staff acting to ensure quality and consistency of drafting having regard to practice and precedent (hereafter referred to as Ňcellule des lecteurs dŐarrtsÓ). 
Utkasten till domar och, i vissa fall, utkasten till beslut genomgr en granskning som grs av ett personalteam som arbetar med att skra kvaliteten och samstmmigheten i utkasten med hnsyn till praxis (nedan kallad gruppen av lektrer).
23 24 25 26 27 In particular, when the Courts consider that they have sufficient information to give a ruling on the basis of the written procedure (see Article 76, paragraph 2, of the Court of JusticeŐs Rules of Procedureand Article 135a of the former General CourtŐs Rules of Procedure). 
Uppenbarligen har ven referenten och ordfranden fr avdelningen i frga ansvar fr att 23 24 25 26 27 Framfr allt om domstolarna anser att de har tillrckligt underlag fr att avgra mlet mot bakgrund av den skriftliga delen av frfarandet (se artikel 76.2 i domstolens rttegngsregler och artikel 135a i tribunalens tidigare rttegngsregler).
Where the case does not raise new points of law, the Court of Justice may decide without an opinion of the Advocate-General. 
Om inte mlet tar upp nya rttsfrgor kan domstolen avgra utan frslag till avgrande frn generaladvokaten.
It is also possible at the General Court to request such an opinion, but this provision is not used in practice. 
Det r ocks mjligt vid tribunalen att begra ett sdant frslag till avgrande, men den bestmmelsen anvnds inte i praktiken.
The Judges deliberate on the basis of a draft judgment drawn up by the Reporting Judge. 
Domarna verlgger p grundval av ett utkast till dom som upprttats av referenten.
Each Judge of the formation concerned may propose changes. 
Varje domare som ska dma i mlet kan fresl ndringar.
Judgments are signed by all the Judges who took part in the deliberation and their operative part is pronounced in open court. 
Domen undertecknas av de domare som deltagit i den muntliga verlggningen och domslutet avkunnas vid ett offentligt sammantrde.
This rule applies also to the opinions of the Advocates-General. 
Denna regel gller ven fr generaladvokaternas frslag till avgranden.
If a decision is not published in the online Reports of cases, it is translated in the language used by the party referring the case to the Court concerned (the so called Ňprocedural languageÓ) if this language is not that used by the Judges for deliberation. 
Om ett avgrande inte offentliggrs i den elektroniska rttsfallssamlingen verstts det till det sprk som anvndes av den part som anhngiggjorde mlet vid domstolen i frga (det s kallade ÓrttegngssprketÓ) om detta inte r det sprk som anvndes av domarna fr verlggning.
20 Interpretation services are provided taking into account the languages that the parties are entitled to use during the hearing, the CJEUŐs working language as well as possible requests made by Judges and Advocates-General. 
20 Tolktjnster tillhandahlls med hnsyn till de sprk som parterna har rtt att anvnda under frhandlingarna, EU-domstolens arbetssprk och eventuella begranden frn domare och generaladvokater.
21 Figure 3 Đ Main steps of case management 22 ACTION BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE OR THE GENERAL COURT Referral National courts, parties and Registry Written procedure President, First Advocate-General, Registry, parties, Judge, Advocate-General and translation Linguistic services (translation and interpretation) Assignment Court of Justice President (Reporting Judge); First Advocate-General (Advocate-General) General Court President on proposal by Chamber President (Reporting Judge) IT services Preliminary report (complemented by the report for the hearing at the General Court) Judge and Advocate-General General meeting or Chamber conference Judges, Advocates-General, Registrar or his representative Administrative services Hearings Chamber (Judges), Advocate-General, Registry, parties and interpretation Legal support (research and documentation, proof-reading and correction) Opinion Advocate-General, translation, Registry and interpreters Closure (deliberation and pronunciation) Chamber (Judges), "cellule des lecteurs d'arrts" andtranslation Source: ECA. 
21 Figur 3 Đ De viktigaste stegen i handlggningen av ml Vckande av talan vid domstolen eller tribunalen 22 Sprktjnster (versttning och tolkning) Skriftligt frfarande Frdelning av ml Domstolen Ordfranden (referent); frste generaladvokaten (generaladvokat) Tribunalen Ordfranden p frslag av avdelningens ordfrande (referent) Ordfrande, frste generaladvokat, kansli, parter, domare, generaladvokat och versttning It-tjnster Frberedande rapport(kompletteradav frhandlingsrapport vid tribunalen) Domare och generaladvokat Allmnt sammantrde eller a vdel ni ng s s a mma ntr de Domare, generaladvokater, justitiesekreteraren eller dennes fretrdare Administrativa tjnster Frhandlingar Avdelning (domare), generaladvokat, kansli, parter och tolkning Juridiskt std (forskning och dokumentation, kontrollsning och rttelser) Frslag till avgrande Generaladvokat, versttning, kansli och tolkar Avslutande (verlggning och avkunnande av dom) Avdelning (domare), gruppen av lektrer och versttning Klla: Europeiska revisionsrtten.
As described in paragraph 9, the CJEU publishes the total average duration of cases as a key performance indicator. 
Ssom beskrivs i punkt 9 offentliggr EU-domstolen mlens totala genomsnittliga handlggningstid som en central resultatindikator.
We confirmed that the calculation of the average durations of the key steps (by type of decision, and by type of procedure or subject matter) used by the CJEU for internal purposes, relating to proceedings closed in 2014 and 2015 at the Court of Justice and the General Court, had been done correctly. 
Vi kunde bekrfta att de berkningar av den genomsnittliga tidstgngen fr de viktigaste stegen (per typ av avgrande och typ av frfarande eller mnesomrde) som anvndes av EU-domstolen fr interna syften och som avsg frfaranden som avslutats under 2014 och 2015 vid domstolen och tribunalen hade utfrts korrekt.
In addition, we carried out a more detailed calculation of the average durations which we considered relevant for case management (see Figure 4). 
Dessutom gjorde vi en mer detaljerad berkning av de genomsnittstider som vi ansg var relevanta fr handlggningen av ml (se figur 4).
For several key steps, standard indicative deadlines are set by the two Courts (see paragraphs 54 and 57). 
Fr flera viktiga steg har de bda domstolarna faststllt standardiserade vgledande tidsfrister (se punkterna 54 och 57).