natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In certain exceptional circumstances, however, described in Article 20(1)(a), (b) and (c), the paying agency, before paying the (non-differentiated) refund, will require proof that the products have been imported into a non-member country or undergone substantial working or processing within 12 months of the date of export. 
I vissa mycket speciella undantagsfall (beskrivna i artikel 20.1 a, 20.1 b och 20.1 c) kan emellertid utbetalningsstllet innan (det icke-differentierade) exportbidraget betalas ut krva bevis p att produkterna importerats till tredje land eller undergtt vsentlig behandling eller bearbetning inom 12 mnader efter exportdatum.
Different rules apply after a refund has been paid (Article 20(4)). 
Sedan exportbidraget betalats ut gller andra regler (fall som avses i artikel 20.4).
C 314/20 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.11.2001 CLEARANCE-OF-ACCOUNTS AUDITS 7. 
C 314/20 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.11.2001 GRANSKNING AV RKENSKAPSAVSLUT 7.
As a result of the findings in Germany it was decided to carry out an enquiry in all other Member States to evaluate the proofs of arrival they accept (customs import documents, embassy proofs, etc.). 
Med anledning av vad som konstaterats i Tyskland har man beslutat genomfra en underskning i alla vriga medlemsstater fr att utvrdera de ankomstbevis de godtagit (tullens importdeklarationer, bevis frn ambassader etc.).
QUALITY OF CHECKS ON PROOFS OF ARRIVAL 10. 
KVALITETEN P KONTROLLEN AV ANKOMSTBEVIS 10.
If an exporter is unable to obtain the primary proof of his choice (a customs import document or certificate of unloading and importation issued by a supervisory company), he may substitute a secondary proof; the forms this may take are listed exhaustively in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999. 
Om exportren inte kan skaffa ett primrbevis (efter eget val, tullens importdeklarationer eller intyg om lossning och import utfrdat av ett kontroll-och vervakningsfre-tag), kan det ersttas med andra handlingar (sekundrbevis) som frtecknas i detalj i artikel 16.2 i frordning (EG) nr 800/1999.
These documents are just as reliable and have the same effects in law. 
Alla dessa handlingar r lika tillfrlitliga och har samma rttsliga verkan.
At a Member Stateеs request the Commission will contact the authorities in non-member countries to find out whether they recognise the document queried by that Member State as valid. 
D en medlemsstat begr det tar kommissionen kontakt med myndigheterna i tredje land fr att f veta om den handling medlemsstaten skickat gller i detta tredje land.
The Commission agrees that it is within the competence of the individual Member States to check the particulars of proofs of arrival. 
Kommissionen instmmer i att det r de enskilda medlemsstaternas sak att vervaka detaljerna i ankomstbevisen.
However, it would emphasise that the requirements for these proofs are the same throughout the EU. 
Det r emellertid viktigt att nmna att dessa bevis skall uppfylla samma krav i hela EU.
The forthcoming enquiry on differentiated refunds to be carried out under the clearance-of-accounts procedure intends to focus on evaluation of the management and control systems for proof of arrival applied in the different Member States. 
Huvudsyftet med den underskning av differentierade bidrag som skall genomfras inom frfarandet fr avslutande av rkenskaper r att utvrdera de system fr frvaltning och kontroll av ankomstbevis som tillmpas i de olika medlemsstaterna.
The Commission will discuss with the Member States the possibility of keeping a register of model proofs of arrival which they are prepared to accept and ways of improving coordination. 
Kommissionen skall tillsammans med medlemsstaterna underska frgan om att hlla ett register med mallar fr ankomstbevis som medlemsstaterna kan godta, samt nrmare freskrifter fr en bttre samordning.
THE EFFECT OF THE PROOF-OF-ARRIVAL SYSTEM ON RELEASE OF GUARANTEES 16. 
EFFEKTEN AV SYSTEMET MED ANKOMSTBEVIS P TERLMNANDET AV SKERHETER 16.
The Commission believes that the stringent rules of the present system are necessary in order to ensure proper control. 
Kommissionen anser att de strikta reglerna i nuvarande system r ndvndiga fr att skerstlla en riktig kontroll.
APPROVAL AND CONTROL OF SUPERVISORY COMPANIES 17. 
GODKNNANDE OCH KONTROLL AV KONTROLL-OCH VERVAKNINGSF RETAG 17.
When a Member State decides to withdraw its approval from a control and supervisory company the Commission duly notifies the other Member States, explaining the reasons for the decision whenever it can. 
Nr en medlemsstat beslutar dra in ett godknnande av ett kontroll-och vervakningsfretag underrttar kommissionen de vriga medlemsstaterna om detta.
The reasons may have to do either with the way the company is organised within the Member State or the checks it carries out in non-member importing countries. 
De kan vara knutna till kontroll-och vervakningsfretagets organisation i medlemsstaten eller till den kontroll detta fretag genomfr i det importerande tredje landet.
The Commission has considered the danger of conflicts of interest in connection with supervisory companies and has drafted a working paper setting out guidelines on this matter. One of its recommendations is that no supervisory company (or other member of the same financial group) involved in an export transaction under Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 may act in the same transaction as customs agent, haulier, forwarding agent or warehousekeeper etc., or in any other capacity that might occasion a conflict of interests. 
Ett arbetsdokument utarbetat av kommissionen ger riktlinjer i mnet som bl.a. gr ut p att det kontroll-och vervakningsfretag (eller dotterbolag tillhrande samma fretagsgrupp som detta) som utfr en kontroll av en exporttransaktion enligt artikel 16 i frordning (EG) nr 800/1999 inte fr delta i denna transaktion i egenskap av tullspeditr, transportr, speditr, lagerhavare eller i ngon annan egenskap som kan ge upphov till intressekonf likt.
19 to 23. As stated, inter alia, in the comments on points V and 34, according to the information available to the clearance-of-accounts unit only Germany in practice accepted certificates from supervisory companies on a large scale. 
Enligt uppgifter som enheten fr avslutande av rkenskaper har tillgng till, och som konstateras bl.a. i kommentarerna till punkterna V och 34, godknde endast Tyskland intyg frn kontroll-och vervakningsfretag i stor skala.
Traders in other Member States only presented such proofs in exceptional cases; they usually present customs import documents to the paying agencies. 
Handelsidkare i andra medlemsstater lade endast i undantagsfall fram sdana bevis; de lmnar i regel tullens importdeklarationer till utbetalningsstllena.
However, the Commission will carry out an audit of differentiated refunds and will consider financial corrections should it find systems errors concerning checks on such certificates. 
Kommissionen avser emellertid att genomfra en revision av differentierade bidrag och kommer att vervga finansiella rttelser om det finns systematiska fel i kontrollen av sdana intyg.
The Commission will try to devise a system that would place greater responsibility on supervisory companies. 
Kommissionen kommer att vervga ett system som innebr att strre ansvar lggs p kontroll-och vervakningsfretagen.
The approval and monitoring of the activities of supervisory companies in connection with the system of proofs of arrival has always been the Member Statesе responsibility. At one time the Commission had plans for a Community-wide approval procedure (Regulation (EEC) No 887/92) but it remained a dead letter and was repealed by Regulation (EC) No 2955/94, experience having shown that the Member States were best placed to judge whether a company merited approval. 
Godknnande av kontroll-och vervakningsfretag i systemet med ankomstbevis till bestmmelseorten och tillsyn av deras verksamhet har alltid varit medlemsstaternas ansvar. Kommissionen planerade en gng att infra godknnande p gemenskapsniv (frordning (EEG) nr 887/92). Denna bestmmelse tillmpades aldrig och upphvdes genom frordning (EG) nr 2955/94.
Following extensive discussions with the Member States, therefore, the Commission drew up a paper which was circulated in 1995 setting out guidelines for them to follow in approving and monitoring supervisory companies. 
Erfarenheten har visat att medlemsstaterna i detta fall r bst lmpade att bedma om ett kontroll-och vervakningsfretag kan godknnas. Kommissionen diskuterade ingende med medlemsstaterna fr att utarbeta ett dokument som publicerades 1995.
In the interests of legal certainty some of the guidelines, particularly for approval, were then incorporated into the general 
Vissa av riktlinjerna i dokumentet, srskilt de som rr villkoren fr godknnande av
8.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 314/21 legislation governing refunds (Article 16(5) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999). 27 and 28. 
8.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 314/21 fretagen, togs dessutom av rttsskerhetsskl in i de vergripande reglerna fr exportbidrag (artikel 16.5 i frordning (EG) nr 800/1999).
The Commission has drawn the problems mentioned by the Court to the attention of OLAF, which is currently carrying out the enquiry. 
De problem som nmns av revisionsrtten meddelades till OLAF, som fr nrvarande hller p med en underskning.
29 and 30. After becoming aware of the problems in Germany, the Commission wrote to all the Member States asking them how many supervisory company certificates their paying agencies had accepted during the period concerned. 
Sedan kommissionen hade uppmrksammat problemen i Tyskland, skickade den ett brev till alla medlemsstater med en frfrgan om hur mnga intyg frn kontroll-och vervakningsfretag som hade godknts av utbetalningsstllena under den aktuella tiden.
It appeared that 7 546 certificates had been accepted, 7 280 of them in Germany (97 %) and only 266 (3 %) in all the other Member States combined. 
Det visade sig att 7 546 intyg hade godknts, av vilka 7 280 i Tyskland (97 %) och 266 (3 %) i alla andra medlemsstater tillsammans.
The decision was therefore taken to focus the checks on Germany, which until the end of 1995 allowed a supervisory company to issue primary proof of arrival even when it had not received timely instructions from the exporter to be present at the moment of unloading in order to carry out checks. 
Det har drfr beslutats att kontrollerna skall koncentreras till Tyskland, eftersom detta land fram till slutet av 1995 tillt att primra ankomstbevis utfrdades av kontroll-och vervakningsfretag, ven d dessa inte i tid hade ftt instruktioner frn exportren att vara nrvarande vid lossningstillfllet fr att genomfra kontroll.
No indication was found in other Member States that the same systems error existed there. 
Det finns inget som tyder p att samma systemfel existerade i ngon annan medlemsstat.
The rate of correction applied to these cases (i.e. those accounting for 97 % of the total) was equivalent to 25 % of the expenditure at risk, representing EUR 20 million. 
Den tillmpade korrektionssatsen (i 97 % av alla fall) var 25 % av de riskerade utgifterna, eller 20 miljoner euro.
This is a very high rate, to be applied only in exceptional cases. 
Det r en mycket hg sats som tillmpas endast i undantagsfall.
The Commission therefore considers that controls were effectively targeted on the expenditure at risk. 
Kommissionen anser drfr att kontrollerna i sjlva verket var inriktade p de riskerade utgifterna.
In addition, as noted above, it has decided to carry out an audit of differentiated refunds in order to examine what proofs of arrival other Member States accept (given that they rarely use supervisory companies) and what checks they carry out in respect of these proofs. 
Dessutom har det beslutats att genomfra ovannmnda revision av differentierade bidrag fr att underska vilka ankomstbevis andra medlemsstater godknner (eftersom kontroll-och vervakningsfretag sllan anlitas av dessa andra lnder) och vilka kontroller som genomfrs med avseende p dessa bevis.
OLAF is following up these cases. 
OLAF fljer dessa fall.
Over the years the Commission has done its best to address the problem of how best to provide proof of arrival at destination. 
Kommissionen har under rens lopp anstrngt sig fr att finna lmpliga lsningar p frgan vilka typer av bevis p ankomst till bestmmelseorten som kan godknnas.
To make it easier for Community exporters to obtain proof of importation it provided, in Regulation (EEC) No 887/92, that certificates issued by supervisory companies, already listed as secondary proof, could be used as primary proof in the same way as customs import documents. 
Fr att underltta fr gemenskapens exportrer att skaffa importbevis har kommissionen genom frordning (EEG) nr 887/92 infrt som primrbevis (det existerade tidigare som sekundrbevis) intyg som lmnas av kontroll-och vervakningsfretag, vilket jmstlls med tullens importdeklarationer.
The Commissionеs view is that supervisory company certificates should continue to be categorised as primary proof, as this gives exporters greater scope and prevents them from being wholly reliant on importers in non-member countries for primary proof of import (since in normal commercial practice it is usually the importer who has access to the customs import document). 
Kommissionen anser det vrdefullt att behlla denna typ av primrbevis frn kontroll-och vervakningsfretag fr att ge exportrer strre mjligheter att verka och inte lmna dem helt i hn-derna p importrer i tredje lnder nr det gller att skaffa primra importbevis, eftersom det normalt r denne importr som har tillgng till tullens importdeklarationer i handelskedjan.
RELIABILITY OF PROOFS OF ARRIVAL ISSUED BY MEMBER STATESе EMBASSIES 35. 
TILLF RLITLIGHETEN F R ANKOMSTBEVIS SOM HAR UTFRDATS AV MEDLEMSSTATERNAS AMBASSADER 35.
Embassies and consulates have a different legal status to supervisory companies. 
Ambassader och konsulat har en annan rttslig stllning n kontroll-och vervakningsfretag.
Specific provision is made in the Community rules for the latter (Article 16(5) of Regulation (EC) No 800/ 1999). 
Fr dessa fretag finns srskilda bestmmelser i gemenskapens lagstiftning (artikel 16.5 i frordning (EG) nr 800/1999).
These matters will be followed up in the course of the specific audit of differentiated refunds referred to in point 12. 
Dessa frgor kommer ocks att fljas upp under ovannmnda srskilda revision av de differentierade bidragen (se punkt 12).
The Commission would also point out that it is the clear responsibility of the Member States to guarantee the soundness of these proofs. 
Kommissionen vill ocks framhlla att medlemsstaterna har ett tydligt ansvar fr att bevisen r korrekta.
TYPES OF PROBLEMS AND/OR IRREGULARITIES WHICH HAVE BEEN DETECTED IN EXPORTS TO SPECIFIC DESTINATIONS Jordan б circumvention of UN embargo on supplies to Iraq 40 to 42. 
PROBLEM OCH/ELLER OEGENTLIGHETER SOM HAR UPPTCKTS VID EXPORT TILL VISSA BESTMMELSEORTER Jordanien Đ kringgende av FN:s embargo p leveranser till Irak 40Đ42.
At the Sixth Conference of Directors of EU paying agencies (6May1999),OLAF(UCLAF,asitthenwas)invitedtheagencies concerned to contact it with a view to getting the available codes for Russian customs offices. 
Vid den sjtte konferensen fr cheferna fr EU:s utbetalningsstllen som hlls den 6 maj 1999 hade varje berrt utbetalningsstlle ombetts ta kontakt med OLAF (som d hette UCLAF) fr att f de regler fr ryska tullkontor som fanns tillgngliga.
The Commission notes with satisfaction that the Court acknowledges the measures it has taken with regard to the acceptability and control of proofs of arrival for exports to Russia. 
Kommissionen r tacksam fr att revisionsrtten har noterat kommissionens tgrder mot problemet med godtagbarhet och kontroll av ankomstbevis fr export till Ryssland.
Egypt б treatment of shortages and rejected products 48. 
Egypten Đ behandling av underskott och avvisade produkter 48.
There is no difference of opinion between the Commission and the Court on how to deal with differences between weight at departure and weight at destination. 
Det finns ingen meningsmotsttning mellan kommissionen och revisionsrtten om hur skillnaderna mellan vikten vid avsndandet och vikten p bestmmelseorten skall hanteras.
In so far as the discrepancies observed relate to samples taken by the authorities in the non-member country (if demonstrated to be the case), Article 15(4) of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 allows for the refund to be granted on the weight of the samples. 
I den mn de noterade skillnaderna hnfr sig till prover som tagits av myndigheterna i det tredje landet (om detta visas vara fallet), medger artikel 15.4 i frordning (EG) nr 800/1999 att exportbidrag beviljas fr provernas vikt.
C 314/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.11.2001 These cases will be examined during the clearance-of-accounts unitеs audits of differentiated refunds in the course of their missions to Ireland, Germany and France. 
C 314/22 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.11.2001 Dessa fall kommer att underskas nr enheten fr avslutande av rkenskaper granskar de differentierade bidragen under sina uppdrag i Irland, Tyskland och Frankrike.
The danger identified by the Court, that cattle for slaughter may attract the refund for breeding cattle, materialised in a real case detected by the Commission in Germany at the time of unification. 
Marocko Đ berttigande fr bidragssatser och underskott 54Đ56. Den risk som beskrivs av revisionsrtten att slaktdjur ur bidragssynpunkt kan behandlas som avelsdjur noterades av kommissionen i ett verkligt fall i Tyskland vid tidpunkten fr enandet.
The Commission investigated a massive cattle export to Poland, declared as being breeding cattle. 
Kommissionen utredde en omfattande export till Polen av ntkreatur som deklarerats som avelsboskap.
On investigation, the animals were found to be slaughter cattle. (See clearance-of-accounts summary report of 1991, point 6.1.2). 
Underskningen visade att det i sjlva verket rrde sig om slaktboskap (se 1991 rs sammanfattande rapport om avslutningen av rkenskaperna, punkt 6.1.2).
The Commissionеs findings related to: б the absence of pedigree certificates issued by official herd books showing the results of performance tests and the results of the assessment of the genetic value of the animals, their parents and their grandparents, б the health certificates for breeding animals satisfying the requirements of the importing countries, б the lack of age criteria and a general failure to check the commercial evidence (price, delivery conditions, etc.). 
Kommissionens underskning ledde till slutsatser betrffande Ń avsaknad av stamboksbevis utfrdade frn officiella stam-bcker med uppgift om resultat av prestationstest och resultat av bedmning av djurens, deras frldrars och mor-och far-frldrars genetiska vrde, Ń hlsocertifikatfravelsdjurensomuppfylldeimportlndernas krav, och Ń avsaknad av lderskriterier och allmnt bristande kontroll av kommersiell bevisning (pris, leveransvillkor etc.).
In the light of these findings certain conditions were laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2342/92 that have to be met in order to qualify for the refund for breeding cattle. 
Underskningsresultatet utgjorde skl fr att faststlla villkor som skall uppfyllas fr bidrag till avelsboskap. I artikel 3 i frordning (EEG) nr 2342/92 faststlls dessa villkor.
This shows that the Commission has taken the necessary steps to have reasonable assurance that only genuine breeding cattle obtain the higher refunds. 
Detta fall belyser att kommissionen har tagit ndvndiga initiativ fr att skaffa rimliga garantier fr att det hgre bidraget betalas endast fr kta avelsboskap.
In addition, in doubtful cases, Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 should be applied (doubts regarding real destination). 
Dessutom br i tveksamma fall artikel 20 i frordning (EG) nr 800/1999 tillmpas (tvivel om faktisk destination).
France notified irregularities involving three companies for the year 2000, to a total value of FRF 1 061 506,85. 
Frankrike har under r 2000 anmlt oegentligheter i tre fretag till ett belopp av 1 061 506,85 franska franc.
The Commission does not agree with the Court that no export refund should be paid on butter going to Estonia because there is a zero duty rate on the entry of Estonian butter into the Community. 
Kommissionen instmmer inte i revisionsrttens uppfattning att exportbidrag inte borde betalas fr smr avsett fr Estland, eftersom import av estniskt smr till gemenskapen inte r tullbelagd.
Nevertheless it is prepared to examine the situation in light of the Courtеs comments. 
Kommissionen r emellertid beredd att underska situationen mot bakgrund av revisionsrttens kommentarer.
The Commissionеs present position is that milk prices in Estonia are among the lowest in the candidate countries (e.g. Estonia: EUR 13/100 kg, Poland: EUR 24/100 kg), and consequently Estonian butter prices are close to the world market price. 
Kommissionens nuvarande stndpunkt r den att Estlands mjlkpriser hr till de lgsta i kandidatlnderna: 13 euro/100 kg, mot 24 euro/100 kg i Polen, och fljaktligen ligger de estniska smrpriserna nra vrldsmarknadspriset.
In the Estonian case it is worth noting that the rules established are fulfilling their function and the competent authorities within and outside the EU are cooperating to combat cases of irregularity. 
I fallet Estland r det vrt att notera att de uppstllda reglerna fyller sin funktion och att de behriga myndigheterna inom och utanfr EU samarbetar fr att bekmpa fall av oegentligheter.
While the Estonian authorities claim they cannot identify the origin of butter in free circulation such a claim has to be judged in the light of the veterinary certification which must be issued by the country of origin and which must accompany products at all times for health reasons. 
Medan de estniska myndigheterna hvdar att de inte kan faststlla ursprunget fr smr i fri omsttning skall ett sdant pstende bedmas mot bakgrund av att veterinrintyg alltid mste utfrdas av ursprungslandet och alltid flja produkterna av hlsoskl.
Research on the potential use of isotopes, which is at an advanced stage, but which will require the cooperation of non-member countries, will in future make it possible for the origin of butter to be identified and checked. 
Dessutom kommer forskningen om eventuell anvndning av isotoper, som r i ett framskridet stadium men som kommer att krva medverkan frn tredje lnder, att gra det mjligt att i framtiden kontrollera/spra smrets ursprung.
The Commission does not agree with the Court that in the context of the free-trade arrangements with Estonia for milk products the export refund for butter should have been set at zero, as was done for cheese. 
Kommissionen delar inte revisionsrttens uppfattning att exportbidraget fr smr inom frihandelsavtalet fr mjlkprodukter med Estland borde ha satts till noll som var fallet med ost.
If the Commission were to fix zero refunds for butter to Estonia it would have to do the same for the other milk products covered by the agreement. 
Om kommissionen skulle faststlla nollbidrag fr smr till Estland, skulle den vara ndsakad att gra p samma stt med vriga mjlkprodukter som omfattas av avtalet.
It would thereby shut EU milk products out of the market of a candidate country and allow other countries to absorb the EUеs share of that market. 
Den skulle drmed utestnga EU:s mjlkprodukter frn marknaden i ett kandidatland och lta andra lnder ta ver EU:s andel av den marknaden.