natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Table 4 summarises these weaknesses identified by the Commission in the Member States. 
I tabell 4 sammanfattas dessa brister som kommissionen identifierat i medlemsstaterna.
Some reports may nevertheless include a general assessment of the state of implementation of IACS, and in this context the CommissionŐs services have concluded that IACS has not been implemented in Greece, while it has been implemented in Austria, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. 
Ngra rapporter kan nd innehlla en allmn bedmning av hur lngt infrandet av IACSharkommitochidettasammanhangharkommissionens enheterdragitslutsatsenattIACSinteharinfrtsiGrekland,men attdetharinfrtsi sterrike,Frankrike,Tyskland,Irland,Italien, Spanien och Frenade kungariket.
Nevertheless, weaknesses still exist in all Member States as can be seen from Table 4. 
Det finns emellertid fortfarande brister i alla medlemsstater, vilket framgr av tabell 4.
The CourtŐs findings confirm, in part, those obtained by the Commission during its audits in the Member States (see Table 5 and paragraphs 69 to 70). 
Revisionsrttens granskningsresultat bekrftar delvis de resultat kommissionen kommit fram till under sina granskningar i medlemsstaterna (se tabell 5 och punkterna 69Đ70).
However, this is not always the case for various reasons, of which the main ones are: (a) the objectives of the checks in the Member States or regions visited were not the same. In 1998, the Commission concentrated mainly on the on-the-spot checks and the application of penalties, while the Court analysed the system in its entirety; (b) in Member States with decentralised databases, (in particular, Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom) some regions are only visited, every three or four years. 
Detta r dock inte alltid fallet, vilket har olika frklaringar, framfr allt fljande: a) Mlen med kontrollerna i de beskta medlemsstaterna och regionernavarintedesamma.Under1998inriktadesigkom-missionen frmst p kontroller p platsen och tillmpning av pfljder, medan revisionsrtten analyserade systemet i dess helhet. b) I medlemsstater med decentraliserade databaser (srskilt Tyskland, Spanien och Frenade kungariket) sker besk endast vart tredje eller vart fjrde r i vissa regioner.
With regard to the latter point, the Commission decided not to undertake a detailed inspection of area aid in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia in 1998 and 1999. 
Nr det gller den sistnmnda situationen beslutade kommissionen att den inte skulle genomfra en detaljerad kontroll av arealstdet i den sjlvstyrande enheten Katalonien 1998 och 1999.
At least 1 million euro isestimatedtoberecoverablefor1997. 3 ( ) Report on the status of implementation of the integrated administration and control system in the Member States, Doc. VI/6467/98 of 6 July 1998. 
Minst 1 miljon euro berknas kunna terkrvas fr 1997. 3 ( ) Report on the status of implementation of the Integrated Administration and Control System in the Member States (lgesrapport om infrandet av det integrerade administrations-och kontrollsystemet i medlemsstaterna), DOC VI/6467/98 av den 6 juli 1998.
C 214/26 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 Belgium Denmark Germany: national level Bavaria North Rhine-Westphalia Schleswig-Holstein Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania Greece Spain: national level Andalucia Aragon Cantabria Castile-Leon Castile-La Mancha Cataluna Rioja France Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Austria Portugal Finland Sweden Galicia UK: England and Northern Ireland Scotland Identifica-Respect Compute-tion Aid Identification and registra-Aid Adminis-On-the- Table 4 Summary of weaknesses identified by the Commission in the Member States regarding the year 1998 (mission reports from 1998 to June 2000) Area aid Animal premiums Respect of rised system applica-trative spot Penalties of rised tion applica-trative spot Penalties Other deadlines databases for parcels tions Adminis-controls On-the-controls deadlines Compute-databases system for animals tions controls controls NB: ÔKeyŐ and ÔancillaryŐ control weaknesses are defined according to the CommissionŐs guidelines for imposing penalties under the clearance-of-accounts procedure, except that controls over duplicate payments, and the correct application of penalties, are treated in this table as ÔkeyŐ controls. 
C 214/26 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 31.7.2001 Belgien Danmark Tyskland: Nationell niv Rioja Frankrike Bayern Nordrhein-Westfalen Schleswig-Holstein Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Grekland Spanien: Nationell niv Andalusien Aragonien Kantabrien Kastilien-Len Kastilien-La Mancha Katalonien Galicien Irland Italien Luxemburg Nederlnderna sterrike Portugal Finland Sverige Frenadekungariket: EnglandochNordirland Iakt-Identifie- tagande Datori-rings- Ansk-Adminis- Iakt-Identifie- rings-och Adminis-Ansk- trativa Kontrol-Arealstd Djurbidrag Tabell 4 Sammanstllning av de brister kommissionen funnit i medlemsstaterna 1998 (rapporter ver revisionsbesk frn 1998 till juni 2000) Kontrol-avseradesystemningarkontrol-lerpPfljderavseraderegistre-ningarkontrol-lerpPfljder vrigt tidsfrister databaser fr skiften trativa om std ler plats tagande tidsfrister Datori-databaser rings-om std ler system plats Skottland Anmrkning:BristeravseendeÓgrundlggandekontrollerÓochÓstdkontrollerÓdefinierasienlighetmedkommissionensriktlinjerfrtillmpningavpfljderinomfrfarandetfravslutandeavrkenskaperna,medundantagfrattkontrollerav dubblabetalningarochkorrekttillmpningavpfljderidennatabellbehandlassomÓgrundlggandekontrollerÓ.
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/27 Germany: central level region of Bavaria region of Lower Saxony Spain: central level region of Catalonia region of Navarre Member States and regions and integrated Penalties controls Other France Ireland Portugal United Kingdom: central level Source: Court of Auditors. region of Scotland region of Wales Not applicable at this level Good Ń functioning without problems Average Ń functioning with some problems Poor Ń not functioning at an acceptable level Computerised databases Identification system for parcels Aid applications Adminis-On-the- trative spot controls controls Computerised databases and integrated control system Identification and registration system for animals Aid applications Administrative controls On-the-spot Penalties control system Table 5 Summary of weaknesses identified by the Court of Auditors in the Member States visited (for 1998 applications Ń mainly budget 1999) Area aid Animal premiums 
Pvisad brist avseende grundl. kontroll Pvisad brist avseende stdkontroll Inga pvisade brister i kontrollerna Icke underskt omrde Klla: Revisionsrttens granskning av kommissionens rapporter frn besk i medlemsstaterna. frdjur 31.7.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 214/27 Tyskland: Centralt Bayern Niedersachsen Spanien: Centralt Navarra Frankrike Katalonien Irland Portugal Frenade kungariket:Centralt Klla: Revisionsrtten.
C 214/28 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 Other findings 67. 
C 214/28 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 31.7.2001 vriga granskningsresultat 67.
With regard to area aid, Member StatesŐ calculations of overshoots of base areas are checked at Commission level by the Market and the Clearance-of-Accounts Directorates. 
Nr det gller arealstd kontrolleras medlemsstaternas berk-ningaravverskridnabasarealerinomkommissionenavmark- nadsenheten och direktoratet fr avslutning av rkenskaperna.
These checks were criticised by the Court in its 1996 Annual Report (1) and the Commission took action to strengthen the information provided by the Member States, allowing better controls. 
Dessa kontroller kritiserades av revisionsrtten i rsrapporten fr 1996(1),ochkommissionenvidtogtgrderfrattfrbttraden information som medlemsstaterna lmnade, vilket mjliggjorde bttre kontroller.
From 2000 (2), the Commission again improved the procedures to be used by the Member States to calculate the overshoots. 
Frn och med 2000 (2) frbttrade kommissionen terigen frfarandena fr medlemsstaternas berkningar av verskridanden.
This procedure, even though not yet guaranteeing 100 % accuracy, can be contrasted withspecialbeefpremiumceilings,wherethereisnosimilar framework to declare and control the overshoot (see paragraph 54(b)). 
Detta frfarande kan, ven om det inte garanterar 100 % korrekthet, jmfras med taken fr de srskilda bidragen fr ntktt, dr det inte finns ngon liknande ram fr deklaration och kontroll av verskridanden (se punkt 54 b).
There is therefore a risk that incorrect calculation of an overshoot by a Member State would go unnoticed by the Commission, leading to overpayments. 
Det finns drfr en risk fr att en felaktig berkning av ett verskridande i en medlemsstat inte uppmrksammas av kommissionen vilket kan leda till alltfr stora utbetalningar.
The Court has identified risk of such errors in Spain, France and Portugal. 
Revisionsrtten har konstaterat att det freligger en risk fr sdana fel i Spanien, Frankrike och Portugal.
THE ROLE OF THE MEMBER STATES 68. 
MEDLEMSSTATERNAS ROLL 68.
Member States are responsible for setting up IACS (3). 
Medlemsstaterna ansvarar fr infrandet av IACS (3).
During the transitional stage, the Commission could request changes to the Member StatesŐ measures for implementing IACS (4). Since 1997, the CommissionŐs interventions have been more limited (see paragraph 34). Main findings at Member State level 69. 
All fr-valtningavstdanskningarĐinklusivedatorsystemochdataba- serĐliggerpmedlemsstatsniv.Undervergngsperiodenkunde kommissionen begra att medlemsstaterna ndrade sina tgrder frinfrandeavIACS(4).Sedan1997harkommissionensingri-panden varit mer begrnsade (se punkt 34). Huvudsakligt granskningsresultat p medlemsstatsniv 69.
During the audit of 1998 aid applications in the six Member States the Court found that, two years after the deadline for its introduction, not all features of IACS were fully in place in all Member States: numerous weaknesses were found and considerable delays had occurred. 
Under granskningen av 1998 rs stdanskningar i de sex medlemsstaterna fann revisionsrtten att alla delar av IACS fortfarande tv r efter sista datum fr infrandet inte var helt infrda i alla medlemsstater.
Table 5 offers a concise overview of the situation encountered, with an evaluation according to three categories: good, average and poor. 
Mnga brister ptrffades och avsevrda fr-seningarhadeskett.Tabell5gerenkortfattadversiktversitua- tionen, med en utvrdering enligt tre kategorier: bra, genomsnittligt och dligt.
(1) Paragraph 3.73 of Annual Report 1996 (OJ C 348, 18.11.1997). 
(1) Punkt 3.73 i rsrapporten fr budgetret 1996 (EGT C 348, 2 18.11.1997).
(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2316/1999 (OJ L 280, 30.10.1999, 3 p. 
5 () Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 2316/1999 av den 22 oktober 3 1999 (EGT L 280, 30.10.1999, s.
(4) Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92, Article 1. () Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92, Article 17, final paragraph. 
(4) Rdets frordning (EEG) nr 3508/92, artikel 1. () Kommissionens frordning (EEG) nr 3887/92, artikel 17 sista stycket. () Utan sdana dubbelkontroller mellan betalning av bidrag fr ntkreatur av hankn och am-och dikor finns det en risk fr att std utbetalas tv gnger fr samma djur, trots det faktum att bidrag betalas fr djur av olika kn.
Such duplicate payments occurred in Portugal. (5) 
Sdana dubbla utbetalningar intrffade i Portugal.
31.7.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 214/29 (b) in 1998, trade in live bovine animals between the Member States amounted to the equivalent of 1,6 million tonnes (around 20 % of EU production (1)). 
31.7.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 214/29 b) Under1998uppgickhandelnmedlevandentkreaturmellan medlemsstaterna till motsvarande 1,6 miljoner ton (ungefr 20 % av EU:s produktion (1). ven om frordningarna freskriver att medlemsstaterna skall samarbeta med varandra fr attinfraIACS(2)saknadesoftasdantsamarbetenrdetgl-lerutbyteavinformationomfrflyttningaravntkreatur mellan medlemsstaterna.
This resulted in insufficient checks on the identification and eligibility of animals for aid in the importing Member State; (c) there are similarities between IACS and veterinary legislation which result from interservice cooperation at the time of drafting. 
Detta ledde till otillrckliga kontroller av djurens identifikation och berttigande till bidrag i den importerande medlemsstaten. c) Det finns likheter mellan IACS-lagstiftningen och lagstiftningen p veterinromrdet, vilket beror p samarbete mellan olika enheter nr lagstiftningen utarbetades.
Regarding the controls required by the new bovine identification and registration Regulation, as described in paragraph 18, there was a general lack of coordination between the veterinary (i.e. bovine identification and registration) and IACS inspections, with a risk of unnecessary duplication of effort. 
Nr det gller de kontroller som krvs enligt den nya frordningen om identifiering och registrering, ssom beskrivet i punkt 18, fanns en generell brist p samordning mellan de veterinra kontrollerna (det vill sga identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur) och IACS-kontrollerna, vilket medfr en risk fr ondigt dubbelarbete.
Both Regulations stipulate checks on 10 % (of herds for veterinary inspections and of aid applications for IACS inspections) but it is quite possible to carry out these checks using similarsamples,astherisk-analysiscriteriaarealsoverysimi-lar. 
Bda frordningarna freskriver att 10 % skall kontrolleras (10 % av besttningarna fr veterinrkontroller och 10 % av anskningarna fr IACS-kontrollerna), men det r fullt mjligt att genomfra dessa kontroller med liknande urval, eftersom kriterierna fr riskanalysen ocks r vldigt lika.
Furthermore, where there is an absence of coordination, there is a risk that errors found on one type of inspection will not automatically be communicated to the authority responsible for the other (see paragraph 42(a)). 
Vid bristande samordning finns det ven en risk fr att fel som ptrffas vid en typ av kontroll inte automatiskt meddelas till den myndighet som ansvarar fr den andra typen av kontroll (se punkt 42 a).
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusion 72. 
SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER Slutsatser 72.
In 1999, 63,6 % of EAGGF-Guarantee Section expenditure was processed by IACS, either directly or indirectly. In 2004, this percentage should exceed 80 % (see paragraph 6). 
Under 1999 behandlades 63,6 % av utgifterna inom EUGFJ:s garantisektion direkt eller indirekt genom IACS. r 2004 kommer denna procentsats frmodligen att verstiga 80% (se punkt 6).
It is therefore important that this system has been well designed, and for the most part is effectively implemented in order to control the European UnionŐs agricultural expenditure and avoid undue payments. 
Det r drfr viktigt att detta system har utformats vl och till strsta delen infrs p ett effektivt stt s att EU:s jordbruksutgifter kan kontrolleras och felaktiga utbetalningar undvikas.
The system rests on two pillars, namely the identification of parcels of agricultural land and the identification of animals. 
Systemet vilar p tv grundstenar, nmligen identifiering av jordbruksskiften och identifiering av djur.
Both pillars have to be sound (all parcels of agricultural land and all animals have to be correctly identified) and all computer databases and procedures have to be well designed and implemented. 
Bda grundstenarna mste vara sunda (alla jordbruksskiften och alla djur mste identifieras korrekt) och alla datoriserade databaser och frfaranden mste utformas och tillmpas p ett bra stt.
IACS provides a sound basis for controlling most of the EAGGF-Guarantee Section expenditure. 
IACS ger en bra grund fr kontroll av strre delen av utgifterna inom EUGFJ:s garantisektion.
(1) CommissionŐs Comext database and Eurostat monthly statistics of meat (11-2000). 
(1) Kommissionens databas Comext och Eurostats mnatliga statistik verktt(11Đ2000).
(2) Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92, Article 15. 
(2) Kommissionens frordning (EEG) nr 3887/92, artikel 15.
74. In 1998, the sixth year after its creation and the second after the end of the transitional period, there were weaknesses in the implementation of IACS in all the Member States visited. 
74. r 1998, sjtte ret efter inrttandet och andra ret efter slutet p vergngsperioden, fanns brister i infrandet av IACS i alla de beskta medlemsstaterna.
A lack of coordination between the veterinary and IACS inspections could also be observed. 
En bristande samordning mellan de veterinra kontrollerna och IACS-kontrollerna kunde ocks iakttas.
This deficiency has resulted in a multiplication of the checks on farmers and financial burdens for the Member States. 
Denna brist har lett till att kontrollerna av jordbrukare och medlemsstaternas ekonomiska brda mngdubblats.
The implementation of integrated controls at this level would seem appropriate (see paragraph 71). 
Det tycks lmpligt att infra integrerade kontroller p denna niv (se punkt 71).
The CommissionŐs Clearance-of-Accounts Directorate is responsible for the control and audit of expenditure, and for imposing financial penalties on Member States. It is also responsible for the management and administration of IACS, for the organisation of changes to the Regulations and for the issuing of guidance to Member States. 
Kommissionens direktorat fr avslutning av rkenskaperna ansvarar fr kontroll och granskning av utgifterna, och fr att beslutaomekonomiskasanktionermotmedlemsstaterna.Enhe-tenharventilluppgiftattfrvaltaochadministreraIACS,att organisera ndringar av frordningar och att ge ut riktlinjer till medlemsstaterna.
While the Directorate has been concentrating on assessing the performance of Member States in the context of the clearance-of-accounts procedure, more attention should be given to the role of setting policy and guiding Member States. 
Direktoratet har koncentrerat sig p att bedma medlemsstaternas prestation inom ramen fr frfarandet fr avslutande av rkenskaperna, men strre uppmrksamhet borde gnas uppgiften att faststlla en policy och ge riktlinjer t medlemsstaterna.
Furthermore IACS Regulations are complex and subject to frequent amendments. 
Vidare r IACS-frordningarna komplicerade och ndras ofta.
Despite interpretations given by the Commission, there are still different interpretations in the Member States or between the regions of the same Member State and, as a consequence, unequal treatment of the farmers of the European Union. The Commission needs to do more to guide Member States so as to ensure that the Regulations are properly understood and correctly and consistently applied throughout the Union (see paragraphs43to45). 
Trots de tolkningar som kommissionen gett ut frekommer olikatolkningarimedlemsstaternaelleriolikaregionerisamma medlemsstat, och fljaktligen till olika behandling av jordbrukare iEuropeiskaunionen.Kommissionenmstegramerfrattvg-leda medlemsstaterna fr att kunna skerstlla att frordningarna tolkas rtt och tillmpas korrekt och konsekvent i hela EU (se punkterna 43Đ45).
As regards the new bovine identification and registration Regulations, and particularly the approval of the databases, there was a general lack of coordination between the Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General and the Agriculture Directorate-General in 1999. 
Nr det gller de nya frordningarna om identifiering och registrering av ntkreatur, och srskilt godknnandet av databaserna, fanns en generell brist p samordning mellan generaldirektoratet fr hlsa och konsumentskydd och generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk under 1999.
Furthermore, the procedure for approving databases was not adequate and there was no monitoring programme to check whether approved databases remain fully operational and comply with the terms of approval (see paragraph 42). 
Frfarandet fr godknnande av databaserna var inte tillfredsstllande och det fanns inget uppfljnings-program fr kontroll av huruvida godknda databaser fortfarande r fullt fungerande och uppfyller villkoren fr godknnande (se punkt 42).
The Community Regulations contain several anomalies. 
Gemenskapens frordningar innehller f lera anomalier.
The use of land at 31 December 1991, one of the main eligibility criteria for area aid, is very costly to control (paragraph 48). 
Markanvndningen den 31 december 1991 Đ ett av huvudkriterierna fr berttigande till arealstd Đ r mycket dyr att kontrollera (se punkt 48).
Inconsistencies between the various Regulations have also been noted (paragraphs49to51). 
Inkonsekvenser mellan de olika frordningarna har ocks konstaterats (se punkterna 49Đ51).
The Community provisions relating to sanctions were not sufficiently precise in 1998, in particular, with regard to area aid (paragraph 52), and to detection and monitoring of cases of deliberate false declarations (paragraph 53). 
Gemenskapensbestmmelseromsanktionervar1998inte tillrckligt tydliga, srskilt avseende arealstd (punkt 52) och upp-tcktochuppfljningavfallavavsiktligtoriktigauppgifter (punkt 53).
C 214/30 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 31.7.2001 80. 
C 214/30 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 31.7.2001 80.
The extent and quality of the information provided by the Member States needs to be improved. The Commission should continue its efforts to improve and evaluate this information, in order to better manage the Member StatesŐ implementation of IACS, particularly for the animal aid schemes. 
Omfattningen och kvaliteten p den information som med-lemsstaternalmnarbehverfrbttras.Kommissionenbrfort- stta sina anstrngningar fr att frbttra och utvrdera denna information fr att bttre kunna frvalta medlemsstaternas infrande av IACS, framfr allt vad gller systemen fr djurbidrag.
Member States are often slow in providing necessary information to the Commission (see paragraphs 54 to 60). 
Medlemsstaterna r ofta lngsamma med att lmna ndvndig information till kommissionen (se punkterna 54Đ60).
The Commission must identify which information it really needs and issue clear guidance to Member States in this regard and, if necessary, put it on a regulatory basis. 
Kommissionen mste sl fast vilken information den verkligen behver och ge tydliga riktlinjer till medlemsstaterna i detta avseende och om ndvndigt infrliva dem i lagstiftningen.
In particular, more effort should be made to ensure that information supplied by Member States on the results of administrative and on-the-spot checks is consistent and complete. 
Strre anstrng-ningarbrgrasfrattskerstllaattmedlemsstaternasinforma- tion om resultatet av administrativa kontroller och kontroller p platsen r konsekvent och fullstndig.
The current limitations inhibit the CommissionŐs ability to effectively manage the implementation of IACS by the Member States. Recommendations 81. 
De nuvarande begrnsningarna frsmrar kommissionens mjligheter att p ett effektivt stt hantera medlemsstaternas infrande av IACS.