natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The survey included questions on the relevance, added value and challenges of the support given to Member States; visits to national authorities in Belgium and France in order to assess the relevance and added value of the support they receive. 
Enkten innehll frgor om relevansen och mervrdet hos och problemen med det std som getts till medlemsstaterna. Besk hos nationella myndigheter i Belgien och Frankrike fr att bedma relevansen och mervrdet hos det std som de fr.
OBSERVATIONS Support is relevant and well designed 15. 
IAKTTAGELSER Stdet r relevant och vl utformat 15.
We examined the CommissionŐs policy framework in order to assess whether it addressed Member StatesŐ needs, and whether there were any gaps. 
Vi granskade kommissionens politiska ram fr att bedma om den tillgodosg medlemsstaternas behov och om det fanns ngra brister.
The Commission addressed the needs of Member States, with few exceptions 16. 
Kommissionen tillgodosg medlemsstaternas behov, med f undantag 16.
Member StatesŐ policymakers can inform the Commission about the areas where they need support in addressing radicalisation. 
Medlemsstaternas beslutsfattare kan informera kommissionen om p vilka omrden de behver std i kampen mot radikalisering.
This is done through various meetings, networks and documents (e.g. the Council Working Group on Terrorism, the network of prevent policymakers launched in February 2017 and Council Conclusions), or as part of the approval of work programmes for EU funds. 
Detta sker genom olika mten, ntverk och dokument (t.ex. rdets arbetsgrupp mot terrorism, ntverket av nationella beslutsfattare som har som ml att frhindra terrorism, som inledde sin verksamhet i februari 2017, och rdets slutsatser) eller som en del av godknnandet av arbetsprogram fr att komma i frga fr EU-medel.
We found that when the Commission drafted its policy framework to address radicalisation, it took account of the needs expressed by Member StatesŐ policymakers (see Box 4). 
Vi konstaterade att kommissionen tog hnsyn till de behov som beslutsfattarna i medlemsstaterna hade uttryckt nr den utarbetade sin politiska ram fr att bekmpa radikalisering (se ruta 4).
14 Box 4 - Examples where the Commission took account of the needs expressed by Member States In November 2015, the Member StatesŐ Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs used the Conclusions of the Council of the European Union to highlight the need for the Commission to support Member States in addressing radicalisation in prisons. 
15 Ruta 4 Đ Exempel p nr kommissionen tog hnsyn till behov som medlemsstaterna uttryckt I november 2015 anvnde medlemsstaternas ministrar med ansvar fr rttsliga och inrikes frgor rdets slutsatser fr att uppmrksamma behovet av att kommissionen stder medlemsstaterna i kampen mot radikalisering i fngelser.
In response, the 2016 ŇCommunication on supporting the prevention of radicalisation leading to violent extremismÓ included a focus on radicalisation in prisons. 
Som ett svar p det lg fokus i meddelandet Att stdja det frebyggande arbetet mot radikalisering som leder till vldsinriktad extremism frn 2016 bland annat p radikalisering i fngelser.
In modifying its support, the Commission takes account of the work of European bodies such as Europol which provides it with information on the threat situation in Member States (see Box 5). 
Nr kommissionen ndrar sitt std tar den hnsyn till det arbete som utfrs av europeiska organ som Europol, som frser den med information om hotbilden i medlemsstaterna (se ruta 5).
15 Following the terrorist attacks in Paris and Denmark in early 2015, in March 2015 EU Education Ministers issued the Paris Declaration on promoting citizenship and the common values of freedom, tolerance and non-discrimination through education. 
16 Efter terroristattackerna i Paris och Danmark i brjan av 2015 utfrdade EU:s utbildningsministrar i mars 2015 frklaringen om frmjande av medborgarskap och de gemensamma vrdena frihet, tolerans och icke-diskriminering genom utbildning (Parisfrklaringen).
In line with this Declaration, the 2016 ŇCommunication on supporting the prevention of radicalisation leading to violent extremismÓ placed greater emphasis on tackling social exclusion. 
I linje med denna frklaring lades i meddelandet Att stdja det frebyggande arbetet mot radikalisering som leder till vldsinriktad extremism frn 2016 strre tonvikt vid att bekmpa social utestngning.
Box 5 - The CommissionŐs support changes in response to the threat situation In response to recent terrorist attacks in Europe and EuropolŐs analysis, the 2016 ŇCommunication on supporting the prevention of radicalisation leading to violent extremismÓ highlighted the threat posed by returning foreign terrorist fighters (those who leave their home in the EU and travel to other countries, e.g. the conflict zones in Syria and Iraq, to take part in terrorist fighting or training). 
Ruta 5 Đ Kommissionens std ndras beroende p hotbilden Som ett svar p terroristattacker i Europa nyligen och Europols analys uppmrksammades i meddelandet Att stdja det frebyggande arbetet mot radikalisering som leder till vldsinriktad extremism frn 2016 det hot som tervndande utlndska terroriststridande utgr (som lmnar sina hem i EU och reser till andra lnder, t.ex. konfliktomrdena i Syrien och Irak, fr att delta i terrorstrider eller utbildning).
It reinforced support for developing exit strategies to help individuals to disengage from radicalised environments and reintegrate into society. 
Meddelandet frstrkte stdet till utveckling av exitstrategier fr att hjlpa enskilda individer att lmna radikaliserade miljer och terintegreras i samhllet.
As the Commission takes account of the needs expressed by Member States, the policy framework focuses support for Member States on relevant areas. 
Eftersom kommissionen tar hnsyn till de behov som medlemsstaterna uttrycker, riktar den politiska ramen in stdet till medlemsstaterna p relevanta omrden.
Our survey confirmed that most respondents felt the CommissionŐs support for Member States in the various areas was relevant (see Figure 2). 
Vr enkt bekrftade att merparten av de svarande ansg att kommissionens std till medlemsstaterna p de olika omrdena var relevant (se figur 2).
The percentage varied between 64 % and 80 %, depending on the area. 
Procentsatsen varierade mellan 64 och 80 %, beroende p omrde.
The Annex shows how the Commission not only targeted relevant areas in its policy framework, but also applied the various EU funds to carry out actions which actually address those areas in practice. 
Bilagan visar hur kommissionen inte bara riktade in sig p relevanta omrden i sin politiska ram utan ocks anvnde de olika EU-medlen till att faktiskt vidta tgrder p de omrdena i praktiken.
Figure 2 - Relevance of the Commission support Source: Audit survey of Member StatesŐ Permanent Representations to the EU. 
Figur 2 Đ Relevans hos kommissionens std Klla: Revisionsenkt bland medlemsstaternas stndiga representationer vid EU.
However, there were exceptions where needs were not sufficiently addressed: The Belgian authorities informed us that the issue of mainstream media (television, radio and the press) was insufficiently addressed in the policy framework. 
Det fanns dock undantag dr behov inte tillgodosgs tillrckligt: De belgiska myndigheterna informerade oss om att frgan om de traditionella medierna (tv, radio och tidningar) inte behandlades tillrckligt i den politiska ramen.
They considered it important to include this issue in the policy framework in order to facilitate reflection on the mediaŐs role not only in encouraging people to leave Europe to fight in Syria but also in contributing to polarisation in society, which could create tensions leading to radicalisation. 
De ansg att det r viktigt att ta med denna frga i den politiska ramen fr att frmja reflektioner kring mediernas roll inte bara nr det gller att uppmuntra mnniskor att resa frn Europa till Syrien fr att strida utan ocks nr det gller att bidra till polarisering i samhllet, vilket kan skapa spnningar som leder till radikalisering.
The need to develop exit strategies (see Box 5) was not sufficiently addressed in practice. In 2014, the Commission launched a call for proposals for projects to be financed by the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ. 
Behovet av att ta fram exitstrategier (se ruta 5) tillgodosgs inte tillrckligt i praktiken. r 2014 publicerade kommissionen en frslagsinfordran fr projekt som skulle finansieras av Fonden fr inre skerhet Đ polisdelen.
This call aimed to address two priorities: preventing radicalisation and developing exit strategies. 
Frslagsinfordran gllde fljande tv prioriteringar: att frebygga radikalisering och ta fram exitstrategier.
However, only projects addressing the first objective of preventing radicalisation were funded because they received a higher ranking. 
Men endast projekt som avsg det frsta mlet, att frebygga radikalisering, finansierades eftersom de fick hgre pong.
The 2015 and 2016 annual work programmes for the 16 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Not relevant Relevant Developing knowledge of radicalisation and sharing practices Countering terrorist propaganda Promoting inclusive and resilient societies Identifying and dealing with radicalised people Addressing radicalisation in countries outside Europe % respondents 
17 100 % 90 % 80 % 70 % 60 % 50 % 40% 30 % 20 % 10 % 0% Inte relevant Relevant Utveckla kunskap om radikalisering och dela metoder Motverka terroristpropaganda Frmja inkluderande och motstndskraftiga samhllen Identifiera och hantera radikaliserade personer Bekmpa radikalisering i lnder utanfr Europa % svarande
Support is designed to bring benefits to Member States from acting at European level 20. 
Stdet r utformat s att medlemsstaterna ska ha nytta av insatserna p EU-niv 20.
The Commission not only targets relevant areas, but also makes use of EU funds and tools to deliver concrete support for Member States which is designed to bring benefits from acting at European level. 
Kommissionen riktar inte bara in sig p relevanta omrden utan anvnder ocks EU-medel och EU-verktyg fr att tillhandahlla konkret std till medlemsstaterna som gr ut p att insatser p EU-niv ska ge frdelar.
Examples of this support include the RAN (see Box 1), the EU Internet Forum, the European Strategic Communications Network and the EU IRU at Europol (see Box 2). 
Exempel p detta std r RAN (se ruta 1), EU:s internetforum, det europeiska ntverket fr strategisk kommunikation och EU IRU vid Europol (se ruta 2).
These initiatives, which specifically target radicalisation, promote cooperation between Member States and would not be implemented at all - or not as efficiently - by Member States acting individually. 
Dessa initiativ, som r specifikt inriktade p radikalisering, frmjar samarbete mellan medlemsstaterna och skulle inte genomfras alls Đ eller inte lika effektivt Đ om medlemsstaterna agerade enskilt.
The ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ national programmes managed by Member States are also designed to bring benefits from acting at European level by raising national standards to reduce disparities and by stimulating synergies between Member States. 
De nationella program inom Fonden fr inre skerhet Đ polisdelen som frvaltas av medlemsstaterna r ocks utformade s att insatser p EU-niv ska ge frdelar genom att nationella standarder hjs s att skillnaderna minskar och genom att synergieffekter mellan medlemsstater stimuleras.
18 Member States included specific actions to tackle radicalisation in their national programmes. 
I 18 medlemsstaters nationella program fanns srskilda tgrder fr att bekmpa radikalisering med.
Belgium, for example, financed projects to increase radicalisation awareness in prisons, support a network for assisting vulnerable families, and fund mobile multidisciplinary teams to analyse the needs of local authorities and propose local strategies. 
Belgien, till exempel, finansierade projekt fr ka medvetenheten om radikalisering i fngelser, stdja ett ntverk fr att hjlpa utsatta familjer och finansiera mobila grupper med experter p olika omrden som analyserar de lokala myndigheternas behov och freslr lokala strategier.
The Commission fosters synergies, but coordination could be improved 22. 
Kommissionen frmjar synergieffekter men samordningen kan bli bttre 22.
14 out of the 15 respondents to our survey (see paragraph 14) felt that the Commission was more active now than five years ago. 
Av de 15 kontaktpunkter mot terrorsim som besvarade vr enkt (se punkt 14) ansg 14 att kommissionen var aktivare nu n fr fem r sedan.
The variety of the CommissionŐs actions, which involve different funds managed by eight directorates-general, and which are spread across different policy areas (see paragraph 5), requires effective coordination. 
Kommissionens mnga olika tgrder, som involverar olika medel, frvaltas av tta generaldirektorat och r utspridda ver olika politikomrden (se punkt 5), krver ndamlsenlig samordning.
We therefore examined whether the Commission coordinates its actions in such a way as to maximise synergies. 
Drfr granskade vi huruvida kommissionen samordnar sina tgrder s att synergieffekterna maximeras.
We reviewed the procedures for consulting the various directorates-general before EU funding is granted. 
Vi granskade frfarandena fr samrd med de olika generaldirektoraten innan EU-medel beviljas.
We also reviewed the main actions financed by different EU funds in order to identify synergies, and examined whether the Commission has the comprehensive overview of all its counter-radicalisation actions which is needed to make 17 
Vi granskade ocks de viktigaste tgrder som finansierats med olika EU-medel fr att identifiera synergieffekter och underskte om kommissionen har en samlad bild av alla tgrder mot radikalisering, vilket behvs fr att potentiella synergieffekter ska kunna utnyttjas p bsta stt.
In particular, we checked whether the Commission made full use of the RAN, for example to disseminate the results of EU-funded actions. 
Vi kontrollerade srskilt om kommissionen anvnde RAN fullt ut, till exempel genom att sprida resultaten av EU-finansierade tgrder.
The Commission fosters synergies 23. 
Kommissionen frmjar synergieffekter 23.
The Annex shows different Commission actions can address similar issues. 
I bilagan ges exempel p att olika kommissionstgrder kan glla samma frgor.
Since the Commission is increasingly active in this area, there are opportunities for synergies, particularly where actions intersect. 
Eftersom kommissionen r allt aktivare p detta omrde finns det mjligheter till synergieffekter, srskilt i skrningspunkten mellan tgrder.
Examples of this are: ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ funds provided to Member States for training teachers could address similar issues to Erasmus+ projects; projects funded by the Justice Programme to train and raise awareness of prison staff could address similar issues to Erasmus+ or ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ projects. 
Exempel p detta r fljande: Medel frn Fonden fr inre skerhet Đ polisdelen som tillhandahlls medlemsstaterna fr utbildning av lrare kan g till liknande tgrder som i projekt inom Erasmus+. Projekt som finansieras av programmet Rttsliga frgor fr att utbilda och hja medvetenheten hos kriminalvrdspersonal kan behandla samma frgor som projekt inom Erasmus+ eller Fonden fr inre skerhet Đ polisdelen.
The Commission has a number of procedures to facilitate coordination, the aim being to maximise synergies and avoid duplication of support (see Box 6). 
Kommissionen har ett antal frfaranden fr att frmja samordning i syfte att maximera synergieffekterna och undvika dubbelt std (se ruta 6).
18 Box 6 - Examples of Commission procedures to facilitate coordination Through the process referred to as inter-service consultation, various directorates-general work together to approve annual work programmes which set out the actions planned for EU funds. 
19 Ruta 6 Đ Exempel p kommissionens frfaranden fr att frmja samordning Genom den process som kallas samrd mellan kommissionens avdelningar arbetar olika generaldirektorat tillsammans med att godknna rliga arbetsprogram som anger vilka tgrder som enligt planerna ska beviljas EU-medel.
Some annual work programmes require projects to complement other actions. For example: - the 2016 annual work programme for the Justice Programme required actions to ensure consistency, complementarity and synergies with actions supported by other EU funds, including the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ, Erasmus+ and Horizon 2020; - the 2016 annual work programme for ŇInternal Security Fund Đ PoliceÓ actions managed centrally by the Commission required projects to ensure complementarity with Europol activities. 
Ngra exempel p det r fljande: - Det rliga arbetsprogrammet 2016 fr programmet Rttsliga frgor krvde tgrder fr att skerstlla konsekvens, komplementaritet och synergieffekter i frhllande till tgrder som fr annat EU-std, inbegripet Fonden fr inre skerhet Đ polisdelen, Erasmus+ och Horisont 2020. - Fr de tgrder inom polisdelen av Fonden fr inre skerhet som kommissionen frvaltar centralt krvde det rliga arbetsprogrammet 2016 att projekt skulle skerstlla komplementaritet med Europols verksamhet.
Calls for proposals (the procedure for inviting applications for project funding) may require applicants to show that they will not duplicate existing initiatives. 
Frslagsinfordringar (frfarandet fr att lmna in anskningar om projektfinansiering) kan vara utformade s att de skande mste visa att de inte kommer att verlappa befintliga initiativ.
We examined actions in different areas financed by different funds. 
Vi granskade tgrder p olika omrden som finansierats med olika medel.
We found that Commission coordination has resulted in synergies between its actions. 
Vi konstaterade att kommissionens samordning har resulterat i synergieffekter mellan dess tgrder.
The RAN, for example, is used to disseminate the results of other EU-funded projects (see Box 7). 
RAN, till exempel, anvnds till att sprida resultaten av andra EU-finansierade projekt (se ruta 7).
Further examples are given in Figure 3. This shows several actions funded by three EU funds and demonstrates that synergies exist both within and between funds. 
Fler exempel finns i figur 3, som visar hur flera tgrder finansieras med tre olika typer av EU-medel och att synergieffekter finns bde inom och mellan dem.
For example, the Commission used the 7th Framework Programme (the research programme which preceded Horizon 2020) to fund the IMPACT10 research project which developed tools for evaluating radicalisation actions. 
Till exempel anvnde kommissionen sjunde ramprogrammet (det forskningsprogram som fregick Horisont 2020) till att finansiera forskningsprojektet Impact10 som utvecklade verktyg fr utvrdering av tgrder mot radikalisering.
These tools were used by the STRESAVIORA project funded by the ŇInternal Security Fund Đ Police.Ó This project was then scaled up and disseminated by a project financed by Erasmus+. 
Verktygen anvndes av projektet Stresaviora som finansierades av Fonden fr inre skerhet Đ polisdelen. Detta projekt utvidgades och spreds dresfter via ett projekt som finansierades av Erasmus+.
19 Box 7 - The RAN Collection - an example of synergy between EU-funded projects The RAN Collection of Approaches and Practices, which has been regularly updated since 2014, contains details of radicalisation projects based in the EU which are transferable to other contexts. 
20 Ruta 7 Đ RAN:s sammanstllning Đ ett exempel p synergieffekter mellan EU-finansierade projekt RAN:s sammanstllning av tillvgagngstt och metoder, som har uppdaterats regelbundet sedan 2014, innehller detaljerade uppgifter om antiradikaliseringsprojekt i EU som gr att verfra till andra sammanhang.
The projects have been presented in a RAN Working Group meeting for peer review and approved by the RAN Steering Committee. 
Projekten har presenterats vid ett arbetsgruppsmte i RAN fr sakkunnigbedmning (peer review) och godknts av RAN:s styrkommitt.
There are 108 practices in the RAN Collection, including 16 EU-funded projects. 
Det finns 108 metoder i RAN-ntverkets sammanstllning, inklusive 16 EU-finansierade projekt.
10 IMPACT Europe (Innovative Method and Procedure to Assess Counter-violent-radicalisation Techniques in Europe) aimed to develop a toolkit to evaluate initiatives tackling radicalisation. 
10 Impact Europa (Innovative Method and Procedure to Assess Counter-violent-radicalisation Techniques in Europe, innovativ metod och procedur fr bedmning av tekniker fr att motverka vldsinriktad radikalisering i Europa) syftade till att utveckla en verktygslda fr utvrdering av initiativ fr att bekmpa radikalisering.
Figure 3 - Examples of synergies between Commission actions addressing radicalisation 20 Horizon 2020 (previously FP7) actions to develop knowledge and practices Erasmus+ actions to promote inclusive and resilient societies Internal Security Fund - Police (previously ISEC) actions to counter terrorist propaganda Projects (e.g. STRESAVIORA) Projects are in RAN Collection RAN and IMPACT deliver joint training; Research projects are in RAN Collection Radicalisation Awareness Network (RAN) RAN issue paper on counter-narratives feeds into EU Internet Forum Erasmus+ social inclusion call scales up and disseminates good practices To assess its results STRESAVIORA uses the evaluation tool developed by the IMPACT project CSEP trains civil society stakeholders to produce counter-narratives so they are better prepared to apply for a call for proposals Research projects (e.g. VOX-Pol, IMPACT) VOX-Pol presents reports on online terrorism to 2016 EU Internet Forum RAN feeds the CSEP with its experiences Projects EU Internet Forum Support Expertise European Strategic Communications Network (ESCN) Civil Society Empowerment Programme (CSEP) Source: ECA. There are some coordination shortfalls 26. 
Figur 3 Đ Exempel p synergieffekter mellan kommissionens tgrder mot radikalisering 21 Horisont 2020 (tidigare sjunde ramprogrammet): tgrder fr att utveckla kunskap och metoder Erasmus+: tgrder fr att frmja inkluderande och motstndskraftiga samhllen Fonden fr inre skerhet - polisdelen (tidigare ISEC): tgrder fr att motverka terroristpropaganda Projekt (t.ex. Stresaviora) Anskningsomgng inom Erasmus+ avseende social inkludering utkar och sprider god praxis Fr sin resultatbedmning anvnder Stresaviora det utvrderingsverktyg som tagits fram inom Impact-projektet Projekten r i RAN:s sammanstllning CSEP utbildar berrda parter i civilsamhllet i framstllning av motbudskap s att de r bttre rustade att delta i en anskningsomgng RAN och Impact ger gemensam utbildning.
Although the Commission is able to identify and exploit many connections between actions, there are shortfalls in overall coordination: Different directorates-general are responsible for planning for and reporting on different EU funds (see Annex). 
Det finns vissa brister i samordningen 26. ven om kommissionen kan identifiera och utnyttja mnga kopplingar mellan tgrder finns fljande brister i den vergripande samordningen: Olika generaldirektorat ansvarar fr planering och rapportering av olika EU-medel (se bilagan).
For example, DG Education and Culture is responsible for coordinating projects financed by Erasmus+, and DG Justice and Consumers is responsible for coordinating projects financed by the Justice Programme. 
Till exempel ansvarar GD Utbildning och kultur fr samordningen av projekt som finansieras av Erasmus+, och GD Rttsliga frgor och konsumentfrgor fr samordningen av projekt som finansieras av programmet Rttsliga frgor.
DG Migration and Home Affairs is the lead directorate-general for developing the CommissionŐs policy framework and monitoring its implementation11. 
GD Migration och inrikes frgor ansvarar fr utvecklingen av kommissionens politiska ram och vervakningen av dess genomfrande11.