natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5). Measures linked to sound economic governance issues introduced, but difficult to apply in practice 136. 
Det finns emellertid fortfarande inte ngra verkliga ekonomiska incitament eller sanktioner inom lagstiftningsramen fr 2014Đ2020 knutna till de resultat som uppns med EU-finansiering48. tgrder kopplade till frgor om sund ekonomisk frvaltning har infrts men r svra att tillmpa i praktiken 136.
Moreover, in 2014‐2020 programme period, the Commission can also apply suspensions for issues related to wider sound economic governance issues49. 
Dessutom kan kommissionen under programperioden 2014Đ2020 ocks hlla in betalningar nr det gller frgor som mer allmnt rr sund ekonomisk styrning49.
In particular, the Commission may propose that the Council suspend payments or commitments if the Member State has not taken appropriate action to amend its Partnership Agreement50 or if the Member State has not taken effective action to correct its excessive deficit. 
Kommissionen kan i synnerhet fresl att rdet hller inne betalningar eller taganden om medlemsstaten inte har vidtagit lmpliga tgrder fr att ndra sitt partnerskapsavtal50 eller om medlemsstaten inte har vidtagit ndamlsenliga tgrder fr att korrigera sitt alltfr stora underskott.
However, in situations linked to economic governance, the decision to suspend payments does not lie entirely with the Commission. 
I situationer med anknytning till ekonomisk styrning ligger dock beslutet att hlla inne betalningar inte helt hos kommissionen.
The Commission must keep the European Parliament (EP) informed whenever such a situation arises and must enter into a structured dialogue with the EP if asked to do so. 
Kommissionen mste informera Europaparlamentet nrhelst en sdan situation uppstr och inleda en strukturerad dialog med Europaparlamentet om den uppmanas att gra detta.
Following this, the Commission needs to make a proposal to the Council to suspend the payment, and the Council then takes its decision in an implementing act. 
Drefter mste kommissionen lgga fram ett frslag till rdet om att hlla inne betalningen, och rdet fattar sedan sitt beslut i en genomfrandeakt.
For suspensions linked to economic governance, the maximum levels of suspension as a percentage of payments or commitments is also set in the regulation. 
Fr innehllandet av betalningar kopplade till ekonomisk styrning anger frordningen ocks de hgsta niverna i procent av betalningar eller taganden.
In November 2016, the Commission decided not to propose a suspension in the above cases, in view of the challenging economic and fiscal situation. 
I november 2016 beslutade kommissionen att inte fresl ett betalningsinnehllande i ovanstende renden med tanke p den svra ekonomiska och finanspolitiska situationen.
Instead, the Commission recommended that Portugal put an end to its excessive deficit by 2016 and that Spain did so by 2018. 
Istllet rekommenderade kommissionen att Portugal skulle stta stopp fr sitt alltfr stora underskott senast 2016 och att Spanien gr det senast 2018.
On this basis it may be difficult to apply this provision in practice during the 2014‐2020 programme period. 49 50 51 66 Article 23 of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013. 
P grund av detta kan det bli svrt att tillmpa denna bestmmelse i praktiken under programperioden 2014Đ2020. kad rttsskerhet genom att regler faststlls som frordningar och inte som vgledning 139.
During the 2014‐2020 period, the rules applicable for financial corrections have a different legal form (and, as a result, corresponding stricter legal value). 
Under perioden 2014Đ2020 har de regler som gller fr finansiella korrigeringar en annan juridisk form (och drmed en motsvarande striktare rttsverkan).
For example, (a) the method of determining financial corrections and the indicative rates of corrections to be applied for public procurement errors have, since the 2000‐2006 programme period, been set out in Commission guidelines52. 
Fljande r exempel p detta: a) Metoden fr att faststlla finansiella korrigeringar och de vgledande korrigeringsniver som ska tillmpas vid fel i offentlig upphandling har faststllts i kommissionens riktlinjer sedan programperioden 2000Đ200652.
These guidelines describe the method used by the Commission in the relevant cases and their use was recommended to Member States. 
I dessa riktlinjer beskrivs den metod som kommissionen anvnt i de berrda rendena och medlemsstaterna rekommenderades att anvnda sig av dessa.
The 2013 update of these rules to be used by the Commission was issued as a Commission Decision53; (b) The Commission’s methodology for applying flat rate corrections for the 2007‐2013 programme period was set in a 2011 Commission Decision54. 
68 b) Kommissionens metod fr att tillmpa schablonkorrigeringar fr programperioden 2007Đ2013 faststlldes 2011 i ett kommissionsbeslut54.
Similar rules for the 2014‐ 2020 programme period were included in a Commission Delegated Regulation55. 
Liknande bestmmelser fr programperioden 2014Đ2020 ingick i en delegerad kommissionsfrordning55.
This puts the Commission into a stronger position to enforce those provisions and to ensure a more consistent approach across Member States during the 2014‐2020 period. 
Detta ger kommissionen en starkare stllning fr att genomdriva dessa bestmmelser och skerstlla en mer konsekvent strategi fr alla medlemsstater under perioden 2014Đ 2020.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 141. Overall, until end 2015 (i.e. before the closure of the 2007-2013 programme period) the Commission has made effective use of the measures at its disposal for the 2007-2013 programming period to protect the EU budget from irregular expenditure. 
SLUTSATSER OCH REKOMMENDATIONER 141. verlag fann vi att kommissionen fram till slutet av 2015 (dvs. fre avslutandet av programperioden 2007Đ2013) p ett ndamlsenligt stt anvnde sig av de tgrder som den har till sitt frfogande fr programperioden 2007Đ2013 fr att skydda EU:s budget frn oriktiga utgifter.
Our audit showed that financial corrections for the 2000-2006 period amounted to 8.616 million euro or 3.8 % of the total ERDF, CF and ESF budget. 
Vr granskning visade att de finansiella korrigeringarna fr perioden 2000Đ2006 uppgick till 8 616 miljoner euro eller 3,8 % av den totala budgeten fr Eruf, Sammanhllningsfonden och ESF.
At closure there were net financial corrections for a number of ERDF and ESF programmes and CF projects in 17 Member States for the ERDF, 16 Member States for the ESF and eleven Member States for CF. 
Vid avslutandet fanns det finansiella nettokorrigeringar fr ett antal Eruf-och ESF-program i 17 medlemsstater fr Eruf, i 16 medlemsstater fr ESF och i elva medlemsstater fr Sammanhllningsfonden.
The overall amount of these net corrections was 2 423 million euro (or 1.1 % of the total budget). 
Det totala beloppet fr dessa nettokorrigeringar var 2 423 miljoner euro (eller 1,1 % av den totala budgeten).
We also found that the Commission’s assessment of weaknesses and financial corrections was in substance confirmed by the European Court of Justice. 
Vi fann ocks att kommissionens bedmning av brister och finansiella korrigeringar i sak bekrftades av Europeiska unionens domstol.
While we expect the situation to be similar for the 2007-2013 period, the final impact of financial corrections can be determined only at closure. 
Samtidigt som vi frvntar oss att situationen r snarlik fr perioden 2007Đ2013 kan den slutliga inverkan av de finansiella korrigeringarna endast faststllas vid avslutandet.
Based on our examination of the 2000-2006 closure payments, we also consider that the Commission needs to remain vigilant when checking the closure declaration submitted by the Member States. 
Baserat p vr granskning av de avslutande betalningarna fr 2000Đ2006 anser vi ocks att 54 55 69 Kommissionens beslut C(2011)7321.
For the 2007-2013 period the Commission used payment suspension more extensively than in the past and the newly introduced payment interruptions were a helpful additional tool. 
Fr perioden 2007Đ2013 anvnde kommissionen sig av betalningsinnehllande i strre utstrckning n tidigare och de nyligen infrda betalningsavbrotten var ett anvndbart kompletterande verktyg.
In relative terms, we expect that more financial corrections will be implemented for the 2007-2013 period than in the previous period. 
Vi frvntar vi oss att relativt sett fler finansiella korrigeringar kommer att genomfras under perioden 2007Đ2013 n under den fregende perioden.
We also found that the Commission imposed its preventive measures and financial corrections in a proportionate manner. 
Vi fann ocks att kommissionen genomfrde sina frebyggande tgrder och finansiella korrigeringar p ett proportionerligt stt.
The Commission’s internal procedures for the 2007-2013 period aimed at ensuring harmonised treatment of cases between programmes and Member States. 
Kommissionens interna frfaranden fr perioden 2007Đ2013 syftade till att garantera att renden behandlas p ett harmoniserat stt inom olika program och i medlemsstaterna.
Our analysis also confirmed that the Commission’s measures for 2007-2013 period focussed on those Member States with the riskiest programmes. 
Vr analys bekrftade ocks att kommissionens tgrder fr perioden 2007Đ2013 var inriktade p de medlemsstater som hade de mest riskfyllda programmen.
The Commission’s corrective measures put pressure on Member States to address weaknesses in their management and control systems. 
Kommissionens korrigerande tgrder stter press p medlemsstaterna att tgrda brister i sina frvaltnings-och kontrollsystem.
financial risk for Member States. For the 2007-2013 period the Commission therefore aimed to gradually lift measures to ensure that the reimbursement of expenditure could be resumed as soon as possible for the part of the programme not affected by the shortcomings which initially led to the interruption or suspension. 
Fr perioden 2007Đ2013 hade kommissionen drfr som ml att gradvis hva tgrder fr att se till att utbetalningen av ersttning fr utgifter kunde terupptas s snart som mjligt fr den del av programmet som inte pverkades av de brister som ursprungligen ledde till att betalningarna avbrts eller hlls inne.
We also found, however, that the Commission faces difficulties in monitoring the implementation of financial corrections. 
Vi fann emellertid ven att kommissionen har sttt p svrigheter vid vervakningen av genomfrandet av finansiella korrigeringar.
The Commission’s reporting on preventive measures and financial corrections makes it difficult to get a comprehensive and analytical overview. 
Kommissionens rapportering om frebyggande tgrder och finansiella korrigeringar gr det svrt att f en heltckande och analytisk verblick.
This is mainly due to the fact that the information on preventive measures and financial corrections is presented in several reports and documents, one of which was not even known by stakeholders. 
Det beror frmst p att informationen om frebyggande tgrder och finansiella korrigeringar lggs fram i flera olika rapporter och dokument, varav en av dem var oknd fr intressenterna.
At the same time, none of the Commission reports provides an analytical overview of preventive measures and financial corrections for the 2007-2013 programme period as a whole. 
Samtidigt ger ingen av kommissionens rapporter en analytisk versikt ver frebyggande tgrder och finansiella korrigeringar fr programperioden 2007Đ2013 som helhet.
Recommendation 2 The Commission should issue an ad-hoc report on the financial corrections and status of closure of the ERDF/CF and ESF programmes similar to the report prepared in 2013 for the 2000-2006 period. 
Rekommendation 2 Kommissionen br utfrda en srskild rapport, av samma slag som den rapport som togs fram 2013 fr perioden 2000Đ2006, om de finansiella korrigeringarna och deras status vid avslutandet av Eruf-/SF-och ESF-programmen.
and corrective measures by fund and Member State and display the impact of financial corrections and the residual risk rate. 
I rapporten br all information om frebyggande och korrigerande tgrder per fond och medlemsstat presenteras och jmfras, och fljderna av finansiella korrigeringar och den kvarstende riskprocenten redovisas.
Target implementation date: at the latest mid-2019. 
Mldatum fr genomfrande: senast i mitten av 2019.
We noted shortcomings in information systems used by the Commission to monitor and report on preventive measures and financial corrections for 2007-2013 programmes. 
Vi konstaterade att det fanns brister i de informationssystem som kommissionen anvnder fr att vervaka och rapportera om frebyggande tgrder och finansiella korrigeringar fr programmen 2007Đ2013.
In particular, the information systems are not integrated and they do not provide an overview for individual cases of all preventive measures and financial corrections. 
Framfr allt r informationssystemen inte integrerade, och nr det gller enskilda renden ger de ingen versikt ver alla enskilda renden och alla frebyggande tgrder och finansiella korrigeringar.
70 Recommendation 3 For the 2014-2020 period, the Commission should set up an integrated monitoring system covering both preventive measures and financial corrections. 
72 Rekommendation 3 Fr perioden 2014-2020 br kommissionen inrtta ett integrerat vervakningssystem som omfattar bde frebyggande tgrder och finansiella korrigeringar.
Target implementation date: 2019. 
Mldatum fr genomfrande: 2019.
This is mainly due to the fact that the Member State’s reporting on financial corrections is now integrated into the annual assurance package and examined by the audit authority. 
Detta beror frmst p att medlemsstaternas rapportering om finansiella korrigeringar nu integreras i det rliga garantipaketet och granskas av revisionsmyndigheten.
Moreover the legal provisions introduced for the 2014-2020 period give more power to the Commission to ensure that irregular expenditure is no longer reimbursed from the EU budget. 
De rttsliga bestmmelser som infrdes fr perioden 2014Đ2020 ger kommissionen strre befogenheter att se till att ersttning fr oriktiga utgifter inte lngre betalas ut frn EU:s budget.
Overall, we consider that these arrangements for the 2014-2020 period are a significant improvement in the design of the system Recommendation 4 The Commission should make effective use of the significantly strengthened provisions for the 2014-2020 period and impose net financial corrections wherever necessary on the basis of its own checks and/or the audits carried out by the European Court of Auditors. 
Sammantaget anser vi att dessa tgrder fr perioden 2014Đ2020 har medfrt betydande frbttringar i systemets utformning. Rekommendation 4 Kommissionen br p ett ndamlsenligt stt tillmpa de betydligt striktare bestmmelserna fr perioden 2014Đ2020 och vid behov gra finansiella nettokorrigeringar p grundval av egna kontroller och/eller de revisioner som vi utfr. nskat datum fr genomfrande: omedelbart.
This Report was adopted by Chamber II, headed by Mrs Iliana IVANOVA, Member of the Court of Auditors, in Luxembourg at its meeting of 8 March 2017. 
Denna rapport antogs av revisionsrttens avdelning II, med ledamoten Iliana Ivanova som ordfrande, vid dess sammantrde i Luxemburg den 8 mars 2017.
For the Court of Auditors Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President 71 
Fr revisionsrtten Klaus-Heiner Lehne ordfrande
Annex I An OP can be affected by different preventive measures and/or financial corrections several times during its lifetime and for several reasons. 
Bilaga I Kommissionens processer fr frebyggande tgrder och finansiella korrigeringar Ett operativt program kan pverkas av olika frebyggande tgrder och/eller finansiella korrigeringar flera gnger under sin livstid och av flera olika skl.
The full path of events for an issue which links the preventive measures and financial corrections with the same triggering event(s) is referred to as a ‘case’ in this report. 
Hela hndelsefrloppet fr en frga som kopplar de frebyggande tgrderna och finansiella korrigeringarna till samma utlsande hndelse(r) kallas ett ÓrendeÓ i denna rapport.
One case might therefore involve one or more preventive measure(s) and/or one or more financial correction(s). 
Ett rende kan drfr innebra en eller flera frebyggande tgrder och/eller en eller flera finansiella korrigeringar.
From the triggering event until the lifting of the preventive measure Preventive measures applied by the Commission are triggered by irregularities or serious deficiencies identified by Member State authorities (e.g. managing or audit authority), by the Commission or by the European Court of Auditors (ECA) in the course of carrying out their verifications and audits The Commission can initiate a payment interruption or a warning at any time if evidence suggests a serious deficiency in the OP’s management and control system. 
Frn den utlsande hndelsen till upphvandet av den frebyggande tgrden Frebyggande tgrder som tillmpas av kommissionen utlses av oriktigheter eller allvarliga brister som identifierats av medlemsstaternas myndigheter (exempelvis frvaltningsmyndigheten eller revisionsmyndigheten), av kommissionen eller av Europeiska revisionsrtten nr de utfr sina kontroller och revisioner. Kommissionen kan initiera ett betalningsavbrott eller en varning nr som helst om det finns bevis som tyder p en allvarlig brist i det operativa programmets frvaltnings-och kontrollsystem.
The Member State then has two options: it can (a) dispute the existence of the deficiency identified and give further information to explain its position, or (b) accept the existence of the deficiency and propose remedial actions. The remedy can take the form of an action plan and/or a financial correction (‘confirmed’ financial correction). 
Medlemsstaten har d tv alternativ: Den kan a) bestrida frekomsten av den brist som konstaterats och ge ytterligare information fr att frklara sin stndpunkt, eller b) acceptera att bristen frekommer och fresl korrigerande tgrder. tgrden kan vara en handlingsplan och/eller en finansiell korrigering (en s kallad bekrftad finansiell korrigering).
If the Commission is satisfied with the reply of the Member State, it lifts the interruption or the warning. 
Om kommissionen r njd med svaret frn medlemsstaten upphvs avbrottet eller varningen.
Otherwise, the Commission initiates a suspension procedure after having obtained evidence of a serious deficiency in the management and control system. 
Annars inleder kommissionen ett frfarande om innehllande av betalning efter att ha erhllit bevis p en allvarlig brist i frvaltnings-och kontrollsystemet.
The first step in the suspension procedure is to send a pre‐suspension letter in which the Commission informs the Member State of the deficiency. 
Frsta steget i frfarandet om innehllande av betalning r att skicka en frhandsunderrttelse om innehllen betalning dr kommissionen informerar medlemsstaten om bristen.
Then, the Member State may again choose to dispute the deficiency or accept the deficiency and propose remedial action. Commission processes for preventive measures and financial corrections 1 
Drefter kan medlemsstaten terigen vlja att bestrida eller acceptera bristen och fresl korrigerande tgrder. 1
These steps in the procedure, and the correspondence between the Commission and the Member State, might take place in several rounds. 
Dessa steg i frfarandet, och korrespondensen mellan kommissionen och medlemsstaten, kan ske i flera omgngar.
If the Commission finds the Member State's reply satisfactory, it lifts the pre‐suspension. 
Om kommissionen finner att medlemsstatens svar r tillfredsstllande upphver den frberedelserna fr betalningsinnehllandet.
This can be done at any time in the procedure. 
Detta kan gras nr som helst under frfarandet.
Otherwise, the Commission decides to suspend payments to the OP, which is a legally binding act. 
Annars beslutar kommissionen att hlla inne betalningar till det operativa programmet, vilket r en rttsligt bindande akt.
The, the Member State is required to propose a remedial act in order that the Commission to lift the suspension. 
Medlemsstaten r sedan skyldig att fresl en korrigerande tgrd fr att kommissionen ska hva innehllandet av betalningar.
The lifting of an interruption and pre‐suspension takes the form of a letter informing the Member State about the lifting, while the suspension is lifted by issuing a repealing decision. 
Upphvandet av ett avbrott och av frberedelser fr betalningsinnehllande sker i form av en skrivelse dr medlemsstaten informeras om upphvandet, medan betalningsinnehllandet hvs genom ett beslut om upphvande.
From the triggering event until implementation of the financial correction The triggering events for financial corrections are similar to those for preventive measures. Again, the Commission will first proceed by clearing the facts with the Member State (via exchange of letters and potentially by a hearing of the Member State). 
Frn den utlsande hndelsen till genomfrandet av den finansiella korrigeringen De utlsande hndelserna fr finansiella korrigeringar liknar dem vid frebyggande tgrder. ven hr brjar kommissionen med att reglera fakta med medlemsstaten (via skriftvxling och eventuellt via en utfrgning av medlemsstaten).
Following this, a financial correction can be established in two ways. 
Drefter kan en finansiell korrigering faststllas p tv stt.
The Member State can (a) voluntarily accept the correction, in which case it can replace the erroneous amount with new expenditure, i.e. the EU co‐financing is not lost for the Member State (‘confirmed’ financial correction); or (b) disagree with the proposed correction in which case the Commission issues a Commission decision followed by a recovery order, which imposes a net financial correction on the OP (‘decided’ financial correction), i.e. the EU financing is reduced for the OP. 
Medlemsstaten kan a) frivilligt acceptera korrigeringen, och fr d erstta det felaktiga beloppet med nya utgifter, vilket innebr att medlemsstaten inte gr miste om EU:s medfinansiering (bekrftad finansiell korrigering), eller b) vgra den freslagna korrigeringen, varefter kommissionen utfrdar ett beslut fljt av ett betalningskrav, vilket innebr att en finansiell nettokorrigering grs av det operativa programmet (beslutad finansiell korrigering), vilket innebr att EU:s finansiering av det operativa programmet minskar.
After the amount to be corrected has been established, the Member State needs to implement the financial correction (‘implemented’ financial correction). 
Efter att det belopp som ska korrigeras har faststllts ska medlemsstaten genomfra den finansiella korrigeringen (genomfrd finansiell korrigering).
With regard to the EU budget, the Member State can deduct the amount from the next statement of expenditure and may later replace it by new expenditure. 
Nr det gller EU:s budget kan medlemsstaten dra av beloppet frn nsta utgiftsdeklaration och senare erstta det med nya utgifter.
Depending on the time when the deduction takes place, the Member State immediately withdraw the amount from the next statement of expenditure (withdrawal) releasing the funds to other projects, and recover the amount from the beneficiaries later. 2 
Beroende p nr avdraget grs drar medlemsstaten omedelbart tillbaka beloppet frn nsta utgiftsdeklaration (tillbakadragande), vilket frigr medel fr andra projekt, och terkrver beloppet frn stdmottagarna senare. 2
Otherwise, the Member State can wait until the amount is paid back by the beneficiary (recovery from beneficiary) and deduct it from a later statement of expenditure. 
I annat fall kan medlemsstaten vnta tills stdmottagaren har betalat tillbaka beloppet (terkrav frn stdmottagare) och dra av det frn en senare utgiftsdeklaration.