natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Source: Information forwarded by the SAIs of the Member States; Commission documents on reimbursements made under the FADN; investigations carried out by the European Court of Auditors; Annex I to the consolidated version of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1859/82 of 12 July 1982 concerning the selection of returning holdings for the purposes of determining the income of agricultural holdings (OJ L 205, 13.7.1982, p. 
Klla: Information frn de hgre revisionsmyndigheterna i medlemsstaterna; dokument frn kommissionen om terbetalningar fr ISJR; underskningar genomfrda av revi-sionsrtten; bilaga I till den konsoliderade versionen av kommissionens frordning (EEG) nr 1859/82 av den 12 juli 1982 om val av rapporterande fretag fr faststllande av inkomstfrhllanden i jordbruksfretag (EGT L 205, 13.7.1982, s.
With regard to the costs, sufficiently accurate and comparable information is only available for the FADN and gives rise to the following conclusions: (a) for most of the Member States, the CommissionŐs reimbursements only represent a fraction of the total cost of the FADN (between 10 % and 20 %). 
Tillrckligt exakt och jmfrbar information om kostnaderna finns endast fr projektet om inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn och fljande kan konstateras: a) Fr de flesta medlemsstater utgr kommissionens terbetalningar endast en relativt liten del (mellan 10 och 20 %) av den totala kostnaden fr ISJR.
However, one Member State receives a rather high rate of cover for its expenditure, amounting to approximately 50 % (Spain) and another a very low rate of approximately 2 % (Netherlands); (b) the average cost, per agricultural holding, of acquiring the FADN data varies considerably from Member State to Member State, ranging from approximately 230 euro (Spain) to more than 2 700 euro (Netherlands). 
Tv medlemsstater skiljer sig dock frn detta d den ena medlemsstatens kostnader tcks i relativt hg grad, cirka 50 % (Spanien), och den andra medlemsstatens kostnader endast tcks i mycket lg grad, nmligen 2 % (Nederlnderna). b) Den genomsnittliga kostnaden per jordbruksfretag fr att f in uppgifter till ISJR varierar kraftigt mellan medlemsstaterna inom ett spann frn omkring 230 euro (Spanien) till ver 2 700 euro (Nederlnderna).
Some Member States in fact commission accounting firms to draw up the annual accounts of the holdings in the FADN sample or, within the FADN framework, collect many more data than are required for the FADN itself, such as, for example, information concerning the use of fertilisers and pesticides. 
Vissa medlemsstater betalar i sjlva verket revisionsbyrer fr att upprtta rsredovisningar fr de jordbruk som tillhr stickprovet fr ISJR, eller samlar inom ramen fr ISJR in mnga fler uppgifter fr nationellt bruk n vad som formellt krvs, till exempel information om anvndning av gdselmedel eller bekmpningsmedel.
C 45/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 THE PERTINENCE OF THE STATISTICAL TOOLS USED BY THE COMMISSION 51. 
C 45/14 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 RELEVANSEN HOS DE STATISTISKA VERKTYG SOM ANVNDS AV KOMMISSIONEN 51.
They are also applied to examine whether the agricultural community is achieving a fair standard of living in accordance with the objective laid down in Article 33 of the EC Treaty. 
De har ven infrts fr att se till att jordbruksbefolkningen har en sklig levnadsstandard, i enlighet med det ml som formuleras i artikel 33 i EG-frdraget.
If these instruments actually do provide suitable data for this purpose, thay may be considered Ôper-tinentŐ, i.e. as satisfying the audit criteria applicable to statistics (see paragraph 6). 
Om man genom dessa verktyg verkligen fr fram lmpliga uppgifter fr detta syfte kan de anses vara ÓrelevantaÓ, det vill sga att de uppfyller de tillmpliga granskningskriterierna fr statistik (se punkt 6).
The concepts Ôagricultural communityŐ and Ôfair standard of livingŐ contained in Article 33 of the EC Treaty nevertheless require precise definition before any evaluation of the ÔpertinenceŐ of the statistical indicators relating to them can be carried out. 
Begreppen ÓjordbruksbefolkningÓ och Ósklig levnadsstandardÓ i artikel 33 i EG-frdraget behver dock frtydligas innan man bedmer relevansen hos de statistiska indikatorerna fr dessa bda begrepp.
For this purpose, the Court examined what had been said at the major points in the development of the CAP to clarify the content of Article 33 of the EC Treaty. 
Fr detta ndaml har revisionsrtten underskt vad som, vid de viktigaste stegen i den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, har skrivits fr att frtydliga ordalydelsen i artikel 33 i EG-frdraget.
In addition, the Court asked an agricultural expert to help develop a working interpretation of the concepts Ôagricultural communityŐ and Ôfair standard of livingŐ. 
Fr vrigt har revisionsrtten bett en sakkunnig p jordbruksomrdet att medverka till att ta fram en fungerande tolkning av begreppen ÓjordbruksbefolkningÓ och Ósklig levnads-standardÓ.
The field to be covered by the statistics on agricultural income Changes in the socioeconomic context of the CAP The early days of the common agricultural policy 53. 
Omrden som skall omfattas av statistiken ver jordbruksinkomsterna Utvecklingen av de socioekonomiska frhllandena inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken Den gemensamma jordbrukspolitikens brjan 53.
The early days of the CAP were characterised by the effort to emerge from the difficult situation of the post-war period and achieve self-sufficiency. 
I brjan av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken satsade man p att ta sig ur den svra perioden efter kriget och bli sjlvfrsr-jande.
These two objectives were to be achieved by increasing the productivity of farms (1). 
Dessa bda ml skulle ns genom att jordbruksfretagen hjde produktiviteten (1).
At the Stresa conference in 1958, the Agriculture Ministers and the Commission decided to encourage productivity by supporting the prices of agricultural products (2). 
Vid konferensen i Stresa 1958 beslutade jordbruksministrarna och kommissionen att man skulle gynna produktiviteten genom prisstd till jordbruksprodukter (2).
The European Community gave this policy a legal framework by creating market organisations for the most important agricultural products. 
Europeiska gemenskapen gav denna politik en rttslig ram genom att bilda marknadsorganisationer fr de viktigaste jordbruksproduk-terna.
Price support was meant not only to stimulate productivity, but also to result in an increase in the earnings of the agricultural community. 
Prisstdet skulle inte bara stimulera jordbruket, utan ven medfra kade inkomster fr jordbruksbefolkningen.
By supporting prices, the Commission intended to ensure a fair income for people who had worked full-time over the years in well-managed and economically viable agricultural (1) This also explains the reference in Article 33(1)(b) of the EC Treaty (ÔthusŐ) to the increase in productivity (Article 33(1)(a) of the EC Treaty). 
Genom prisstd ville kommissionen garantera en sklig inkomst fr personer som hade arbetat heltid under mnga r p ett vlsktt och (1) Det frklarar ocks referensen i artikel 33.1 b i EG-frdraget (Óp s sttÓ) till en hjning av produktiviteten (artikel 33.1 a i EG-frdraget).
(2) Collection of documents from the agricultural conference of the Member States of the European Economic Community held at Stresa from 3 to 12 July 1958, pp. 215 and 222. holdings Ń in other words by no means in all agricultural holdings, nor even in average holdings (3). 
(2) Dokumentsamling frn jordbrukskonferensen fr medlemsstaterna i Europeiska ekonomiska gemenskapen i Stresa den 3 till 12 juli 1958, s.
Already at the Stresa Conference, the Agriculture Ministers of the Member States had drawn attention to the relatively unfavourable situation of farm incomes (4). 
Efter konferensen i Stresa riktade jordbruksministrarna uppmrksamheten p de jmfrelsevis mindre frmnliga jordbruksinkomsterna (4).
However, it was not specified what was to be understood by a Ôfair incomeŐ or by an Ôincome level comparable with that of industrial workersŐ. 
Dock preciserades inte vad som menades med Ósklig inkomstÓ eller med en Óinkomstniv jmfrbar med industriarbetarnasÓ.
The question of knowing which income should be measured and what comparison should be carried out remained open. 
Det finns fortfarande inget svar p frgan om vilken inkomst som skall mtas och vilken jmfrelse som skall gras.
In 1956, the Spaak report, which heralded the Treaty of Rome (5), still regarded the family holding as the fundamental form of agricultural activity in the European Community, both past and future (6). In 1960, however, the Commission was already describing an agricultural holding more broadly as Ôan agricultural structure in which farms of various types and sizes complement each other, and in which the farm operating with paid labour Ń a farm that is sound from the socioeconomic point of view Ń will have its placeŐ (7). 
Innebrden av ÓjordbruksfretagÓ frtydligades inte d. I Spaak-rapporten som fregick Rom-frdraget (5) ansg man nnu 1956 att familjejordbruket var den grundlggande formen dittills och i den framtida jordbruksverksamheten inom Europeiska gemenskapen (6). r 1960 beskrev dock kommissionen redan i strre drag jordbruksfretaget som en jordbruksstruktur i vilken jordbruk av olika slag och storlek kompletterar varandra, och dr jordbruk som drivs med avlnad personal Đ ett sunt jordbruk ur socioekonomisk synvinkel Đ har sin givna plats (7).
Neither the Council nor the Commission have given these concepts any meaning that is binding for them (8). 
Varken rdet eller kommissionen har gett dessa begrepp en betydelse som r bindande fr dem (8).
Nevertheless, it is clear from the work at the Stresa Conference that ÔfairnessŐ is to be defined in comparison with other sectors. 
Det framgr dock tydligt av dokumenten frn konferensen i Stresa att vad som r Ósk-ligtÓ avgrs genom jmfrelser med andra sektorer.
(3) Hans-Broder Krohn and Jacques van Lierde, Proposed Criteria for Fixing the Prices of Agricultural Products in the European Economic Community, International Journal of Agrarian Affairs, Vol. 
(3) Hans-Broder Krohn, och Jacques van Lierde, Proposed Criteria for Fixing the Prices of Agricultural Products in the European Economic Community, International Journal of Agrarian Affairs, Vol.
111 (1963), p. 
111 (1963), s.
(4) Agriculture conference of the Member States of the European Economic Community from 3 to 11 July 1959, quoted from: Gottsmann, Der Gemeinsame Agrarmarkt, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Baden-Baden, 5 Loseblattsammlung, Stand 1.8.1998, I A 1, p. 
(4) Jordbrukskonferens fr medlemsstaterna i Europeiska ekonomiska gemenskapen den 3Đ11 juli 1959, citerad i: Gottsmann, Der Gemeinsame Agrarmarkt, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft Baden-Baden, Loseblatt-sammlung, Stand 1.8.1998, I A 1, s. 2 f.
2 ff. () At the Messina conference in 1955, the Foreign Ministers of the Member States of the ECSC set up a working party, chaired by Paul-Henri Spaak, to study the possibilities for increasing economic integration. 
(5) Vid konferensen i Messina 1955 inrttade utrikesministrarna i EKSG:s medlemsstater en arbetsgrupp ledd av Paul-Henri Spaak, med uppgift att underska mjligheterna att frdjupa den ekonomiska integrationen.
The Spaak Report (April 1956) contained the first drafts of the Community Treaties providing for the creation of the EEC and Euratom. 
Spaak-rapporten (april 1956) innehll de frsta utkasten till ett gemenskapsfrdrag som fregick upprttandet av EEG och Euratom.
(6) ÔComit intergouvernemental cr par la Confrence de Messine, Rapports des chefs de dlgation aux Ministres des Affaires trangresŐ, 21 April 1956, p. 
(6) Mellanstatlig kommitt skapad av Messinakonferensen, Rapporter frn delegationscheferna till utrikesministrarna, 21 april 1956, s.
(7) European Economic Community Commission, Proposals for the Working-Out and Putting Into Effect of the Common Agricultural Policy in Application of Article 43 of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Brussels, 30 June 1960, VI/COM(60) 105, II/13 and 14. 
(7) European Economic Community Commission, Proposals for the Working-Out and Putting into Effect of the Common Agricultural Policy in Application of Article 43 of the Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community, Bryssel, 30 juni 1960, VI/COM(60) 105, II/13 och 14.
(8) Berkeley Hill, Farm incomes, wealth and agricultural policy, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 3rd edition, Hants 2000, p. 
(8) Berkeley Hill, Farm Incomes, Wealth and Agricultural Policy, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 3:e upplagan, Hants 2000, s.
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/15 The move towards a broader and more complex concept 58. 
20.2.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 45/15 Utveckling mot ett bredare och mer komplext synstt 58.
In the 1985 Perspectives Green Paper, the Commission examined the need for income support for farmers with low or falling incomes. 
I grnboken om perspektiv fr den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken (1985) underskte kommissionen behovet av inkomststd till jordbrukare med lga eller sjunkande inkomster.
The basic idea underlying the social approach was that structural change in agriculture should be gradually implemented in a way that would cushion farmers from the shock of structural adjustment, while still maintaining pressure on farmers to adapt their holdings to market needs. 
Tanken som lg till grund fr det sociala synsttet var att strukturfrndring-arna inom jordbruket borde ske stegvis fr att skydda jordbruksfretagarna frn en hastig strukturell frndring, samtidigt som pressen p dem att anpassa sina jordbruksfretag till marknadens behov skulle kvarst.
Thus, as long as no alternative income and employment solutions are available to farmers, any income aid scheme for farmers should help avoid social hardship (1). 
S lnge det inte finns ngon alternativ lsning p inkomstproblemen och sysselsttningsproblemen, br man infra stdordningar fr jordbrukarnas inkomster fr att undvika svra sociala situationer (1).
This new approach was received by farmers with little enthusiasm. They distrusted direct income aid as ÔwelfareŐ and were afraid such income support would preclude them from having multiple activities (2). 
Detta nya synstt vckte ingen strre entusiasm hos jordbruksfretagarna som var skeptiska till direkta inkomststd, som vant sig vid std frn samhllet, och som fruktade att en sdan ordning skulle hindra dem frn att utva mnga olika verksamheter (2).
This is why, in 1992, the Mac Sharry reform limited itself to replacing price maintenance only partially by revenue support for agricultural producers (3). 
Det var drfr prisstdet endast delvis ersattes med inkomststd till jordbruksfretagarna genom Mac Sharry-reformen 1992 (3).
This essentially involved three measures: a fall in production prices, compensation for this fall in income by direct payments to producers and measures to limit output, such as the set-aside of arable land (4). 
Det rrde sig i huvudsak om tre tgrder: prissnkningar p produktionen, kompensation fr denna inkomstsnkning genom direkta betalningar till producenterna och begrnsning av produktionen, till exempel genom arealuttag (4).
Agenda 2000 shifts further away from price support to income support by lowering intervention prices for cereals, beef and dairy products, and by increasing the level and scope of ÔareaŐ aid and animal premiums in order to compensate for potential income losses. 
I Agenda 2000 betonades terigen vergngen frn prisstd till inkomststd genom att interventionspriset fr spannml, ntktt och mjlkprodukter snktes samtidigt som nivn fr arealstd och djurstd hjdes och tillmpningsomrdet fr dessa omrden utvidgades fr att kompensera fr eventuella inkomstbortfall.
Two of the five major objectives of the Agenda 2000 CAP reform refer to farmersŐ incomes: to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community and the stability of farm incomes; and to promote supplementary or alternative sources of employment and income in rural areas and thus contribute to economic cohesion within the EU (5). 
Tv av de fem viktigaste mlen fr den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken (Agenda 2000) avser jordbrukarnas inkomster: garantera jordbruksbefolkningen en sklig levnadsstandard och stabila inkomster av jordbruk, samt frmja andra eller kompletterande sysselsttningsmjligheter och inkomstkllor i landsbygdsomrden och p s stt bidra till den ekonomiska sammanhllningen inom EU (5).
(1) Commission of the European Communities, COM(85) 333 final, p. 
(1) Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, KOM(85) 333 slutlig, s.56f.
(2) Nigel Robson, The Changing Role of Part-Time Farming in the Structure of Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 
(2) Nigel Robson, The Changing Role of Part Time Farming in the Structure of Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol.
XXXVIII No 2, May 1987, p. 
XXXVIII nr. 2, maj 1987, s.
(3) Communication of the Commission to the Council Ń the development and future of the CAP Ń reflections paper of the Commission, COM(91) 100 final, p. 
(3) Meddelande frn kommissionen till rdet Đ reflektionsdokument om den gemensamma jordbrukspolitikens utveckling och framtid, KOM(91)100 slutlig, s.
(4) Commission of the European Communities, Communication of the Commission to the Council Ń the development and future of the CAP Ń reflections paper of the Commission, COM(91) 100 final, p.13andp.14. 
(4) Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, meddelande frn kommissionen till rdet, Den gemensamma jordbrukspolitikens utveckling och framtid, KOM(91) 100 slutlig, s. 13 och 14.
(5) Commission of the European Communities, Proposals for Council Regulations (EC) concerning the reform of the common agricultural policy, Brussels, 18 March 1998, COM(1998) 158 final, p. 
(5) Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, Frslag till rdets frordningar (EG) om reformen av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, Bryssel, 18 mars 1998, KOM(1998) 158 slutlig, s.
5 (No 2.1). 
5 (nr 2.1).
In the mid-term review, the Commission emphasised that ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community and contributing to the stability of farm incomes remained key objectives for the CAP. 
Vid kommissionens halvtidsversyn framhlls att garantier fr en sklig levnadsstandard fr jordbrukare och en kad stabilitet i jordbruksinkomsterna fortfarande r centrala ml fr den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
It also stated that many of these farms would need more targeted support to adapt to the opportunities offered by more open markets and consumer demand for quality products. 
Det ppekas dessutom att mnga av dessa jordbruksfretag kommer att behva mer riktat std fr att anpassa sig till de mjligheter som erbjuds av ppnare marknader och konsumenternas efterfrgan p produkter av hg kvalitet.
Moreover, the Commission observed that a minority of farmers benefit from most of the direct payments and questioned whether the distribution of direct support was optimal (6). 
Dessutom gr kommissionen iakttagelsen att en minoritet av jordbrukarna erhller huvuddelen av direktstdet och stller sig frgan om frdelningen av direktstdet r den bsta tnkbara (6).
A comparison of the programmes clearly shows that the requirements as regards information on the financial situation of the agricultural community have changed: whereas, at the outset, it was a matter of compensating for the loss of income via direct payments, since Agenda 2000, the Commission has also been interested in non-agricultural sources of income. 
Vid en jmfrelse av programmen framgr det tydligt att kraven p information om jordbruksbefolkningens ekonomiska situation har frndrats. Tidigare handlade det frmst om direktstd som kompensation fr inkomstbortfall, men efter Agenda 2000 ser kommissionen ven till andra inkomstkllor n jordbruket.
However, these questions (concerning other sources of income and the distribution of incomes) can only be answered if the overall disposable income of the various holdings is known. 
Man kan dock endast besvara dessa frgor Đ om andra inkomstkllor och inkomstfrdelningen Đ om man knner till den totala disponibla inkomsten fr olika jordbruksfretag.
The Commission is also aware of the changed demands as regards information on the farmersŐ financial situation, in particular for the structural policies: ÔThe integrated development of rural areas is becoming an ever greater concern of sectoral policy, including agricultural policy (...). 
Kommissionen r ven medveten om att kraven p information om jordbrukarnas ekonomiska situation har frndrats, i synnerhet fr strukturpolitiken: ÓDen integrerade utvecklingen av landsbygden fr stndigt strre betydelse fr sektorspolitiken, och dribland jordbrukspolitiken.(...)
This generates new needs in terms of statistical data, and particularly the availability of information (...). 
Detta medfr nya behov i frga om kunskaper, srskilt i form av tillgngliga statistiska uppgif-ter(...).
Moreover, these requirements also extend to information on the non-farming component of the income of holdings and families, particularly activities that supplement farming activity and the community services provided by farmersŐ (7). 
Det finns dessutom ett behov av uppgifter om jordbruksfretagens och deras hushlls inkomster frn annan verksamhet n jordbruket, och srskilt frn bisysslor inom jordbruksverksamheten och tjnster som jordbrukarna utfr fr samhlletÓ (7).
(6) Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Mid-Term Review of the Common Agricultural Policy, Brussels, 10 July 2002, COM(2002) 394, pp. 2, 7 ff. 
(6) Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, Meddelande frn kommissionen till rdet och Europaparlamentet Đ Halvtidsversyn av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken, Bryssel, 10 juni 2002, KOM(2002) 394, s. 2 och 7 f.
(7) Second Commission report to the European Parliament and the Council on the state of progress of the implementation of Council Decision 96/411/EC relating to the improvement of Community agricultural statistics, paragraph 5.9, p. 
(7) Kommissionens andra rapport till Europaparlamentet och rdet om genomfrandet av rdets beslut nr 96/411/EG om frbttring av gemenskapens jordbruksstatistik, punkt 5.9, s.
C 45/16 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 Proposed interpretation of the concepts contained in Article 33 of the EC Treaty 64. 
C 45/16 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 Frslag till tolkning av begreppen i artikel 33 i EG-frdraget 64.
In short, the European Community has hitherto failed to interpret the very generic objective of a Ôfair standard of livingŐ and subdivide it into specific, precise and measurable objectives. 
Sammanfattningsvis har Europeiska gemenskapen hittills undvikit att tolka det mycket generella mlet Ósklig levnadsstandardÓ och dela upp det i avgrnsade, exakta och mtbara ml.
Moreover, there is also no definition of the Ôagricultural communityŐ concept either (1). 
Dessutom finns det inte heller ngon definition av begreppet ÓjordbruksbefolkningÓ(1).
However, the Ômajor stagesŐ in the development of the CAP can provide us with information regarding the aspects of the standard of living of the agricultural community that interest the European Community, i.e., in particular, the existence and scale of non-agricultural earnings and the distribution of incomes. 
I de viktigaste stegen i den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken kan man dock urskilja vilka olika aspekter av jordbruksbefolkningens levnadsstandard som Europeiska gemenskapen intresserar sig fr, nmligen om det frekommer inkomster frn andra verksamheter och i s fall hur stora de r, samt hur jordbrukshushllens inkomster r frdelade.