natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The system criticised by the Court of Auditors was replaced by Agenda 2000. 
Det system som kritiseras av revisionsrtten ersattes i och med Agenda 2000.
C 254/22 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 22.10.2002 54 and 55. 
C 254/22 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 22.10.2002 54Đ55.
The Commission does not intend to ask the Member States concerned to change their regionalisation plans, because after discussions at Council level these plans formed a key element in the conclusion of Agenda 2000. 
Kommissionen har inte fr avsikt att uppmana de berrda medlemsstaterna att ndra sina regionaliseringsplaner eftersom dessa efter verlggningar p rdsniv har varit en av grunderna fr genomfrandet av Agenda 2000.
The Commission acted in conformity with the rules laid down by the Council and therefore sees no ground for financial recoveries. 
Kommissionen har handlat enligt de regler som faststlls av rdet och ser drfr ingen anledning till tervinning av beloppen.
The supply of seeds with a very high level of impurities and moisture content does not in itself constitute a failing of the non-food scheme with an impact on the budget. 
Leveranser av frn med mycket hga vatten-och orenhetshalter utgr inte i sig ngon felaktighet inom non-food-ordningen som pverkar budgeten.
All of the crop harvested has to be delivered. 
I sjlva verket skall hela skrden levereras.
There would be a failing if the quantity delivered were fraudulently altered by artificially increasing the moisture content or level of impurities with a view to using part of the crop for other purposes. 
En felaktighet kan t.ex. vara att den levererade kvantiteten ndras genom en phittad kning av vatten-och orenhetshalten fr att lta en del av produktionen g till andra anvndningsomrden.
The Commission believes that in the current situation, where the prices of oilseeds intended for the food and non-food markets are more or the same, the imposition of additional control measures relating to minimum levels of impurity and moisture content would be hard to justify in terms of cost-effectiveness (see reply to paragraph 42). 
Kommissionen anser att det aktuella lget d det sker en anpassning av priserna fr oljevxter avsedda fr livsmedelsmarknaden till priserna fr oljevxter som inte r avsedda att anvndas som livsmedel eller foder, innebr att det ur kostnadseffektiv synvinkel vore svrt att motivera ytterligare kontrolltgrder rrande maximala vatten-och renhetshalter (se svar punkt 42).
This point will be investigated in accordance with the clearance-of-accounts procedure. 
Denna punkt kommer att underskas enligt frfarandet fr avslutningen av rkenskaperna.
60. (a) The objective of market equilibrium is a familiar concept, the exact nature of which changes according to the state of the market (equilibrium between demand and supply). (b) The question of reassessing the support given to products that could be cultivated instead of oilseeds will be examined in the mid-term review of Agenda 2000. (c) From 2002 onwards oilseeds payments are aligned with cereals payment and there is a fixed aid based on cereals yields only in all Member States. This will simplify the regionalisation plans. (d) The Commission does not intend to ask the Member States concerned to change their regionalisation plans, because after discussions at Council level these plans were included in Agenda 2000. (e) Asindicatedatparagraphs46and47,theCommissionbelievesthattheamountswronglypaidhavelargely been recovered under the clearance-of-accounts procedure or by the Member States concerned themselves. 
60. a) Mlsttningen att uppn marknadsbalans r ett knt begrepp vars exakta innebrd utvecklas beroende situationen p marknaden (balans mellan utbud och efterfrgan). b) Frgan om en ny utvrdering av stdet till produkter som kan odlas i stllet fr oljevxter kommer att tas upp vid granskningen efter halva tiden av Agenda 2000. c) Frn och med 2002 r stdet fr oljevxter anpassat till stdet fr spannml och med ett fast std som i samtliga medlemsstater r baserat enbart p avkastningen av spannml vilket underlttar regionaliserings-planerna. d) Kommissionen har inte fr avsikt att uppmana medlemsstaterna att ndra sina regionaliseringsplaner eftersom dessa efter verlggningar p rdsniv ingr i Agenda 2000. e) Som redan angetts i punkterna 46Đ47 anser kommissionen att de belopp som betalats ut felaktigt till strsta delen tervunnits vid rkenskapsavslutningen eller av de berrda medlemsstaterna sjlva.
It should be noted also that the amounts involved are relatively small. 
Dessutom mste det tillggas att de belopp det gller r relativt lga.
Official Journal of the European Communities ISSN 0378-6986 C 294 Volume 45 28 December 2002 Page 1 English edition Notice No 2002/C 294/01 EN Information and Notices Contents I Information Court of Auditors Special Report No 7/2002 on the sound financial management of the common organisation of markets in the banana sector, together with the Commission's replies [ top ] - [ home ] - [ register ] - [ site map ] - [ search ] - [ help ] - [ feedback ] - [ Š ] 
Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning ISSN 1024-3046 C 294 45. rgngen 28 december 2002 Sida 1 Svensk utgva Informationsnummer 2002/C 294/01 SV Meddelanden och upplysningar Innehllsfrteckning I Meddelanden revisionsrtten Srskild rapport nr 7/2002 om frvaltningen av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr bananer samt kommissionens svar [ topp ] - [ hem ] - [ registrering ] - [ karta ] - [ sk ] - [ hjlp ] - [ synpunkter ] - [ Š ]
28.11.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 294/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 7/2002 on the sound financial management of the common organisation of markets in the banana sector, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, of the EC Treaty) (2002/ 294/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................. 
28.11.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning I (Meddelanden) REVISIONSRTTEN SRSKILD RAPPORT nr 7/2002 om frvaltningen av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr bananer samt kommissionens svar C 294/1 (I enlighet med artikel 248.4 andra stycket i EG-frdraget) (2002/C 294/01) INNEHLLSF RTECKNING SAMMANFATTNING .........................................................
INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 
ALLMNRAM..............................................................
Non-compliance with the rules applicable to producersŐ organisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
Frutsttningarnapbananmarknaden .......................................
Limitedeffectivenessofthestructuralprogrammes .............................. 
Alltfrallmntdefinierademl..........................................
Conflictinginterests ...................................................... 
SkyddfrproducenternafrnAVS-lnderna ................................... TGRDERF RREGLERINGAVMARKNADEN ...................................
Europeanpricesandquotarents......................................... 
Motstridigaintressen......................................................
Acomplexandcontroversialsituation ........................................ 
Ettkomplextochomtvistatsystem...........................................
C 294/2 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 28.11.2002 Weaknessesinthemanagementofquotas ..................................... 
C 294/2 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 28.11.2002 Bristerifrvaltningenavkvoter .............................................
Theemergenceofasecondarymarket .................................... 
UTVECKLINGOCHUTVRDERING .............................................
DEVELOPMENTSANDEVALUATION ............................................ 
Kostnadseffektivitet .......................................................
CONCLUSIONSANDRECOMMENDATIONS ...................................... 
Bristerigranskningen.....................................................
Inadequatecontrols....................................................... Paragraph Page 73-85 12 73-74 12 75-78 12 79-85 13 86-99 13 86-92 13 93-99 14 94-95 14 96-97 15 98-99 15 100-107 15 100 15 101-102 15 103-104 15 105-106 16 107 16 ............ 
Punkt Sida 73Đ85 12 73Đ74 12 75Đ78 12 79Đ85 13 86Đ99 13 86Đ92 13 93Đ99 14 94Đ95 14 96Đ97 15 98Đ99 15 100Đ107 15 100 15 101Đ102 15 103Đ104 15 105Đ106 16 107 16 BILAGOR ..............................................................................
17 TheCommissionŐsreplies ................................................................ 
17 Kommissionenssvar .................................................................... 26
28.11.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities SUMMARY Introduction I. The banana market is the worldŐs second largest fruit market after citrus fruits. 
28.11.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning SAMMANFATTNING Inledning I. Bananer r den nst viktigaste frukten p vrldsmarknaden efter citrusfrukter.
A common market organisation (CMO) for bananas was introduced in that sector in 1993. 
En gemensam organisation av marknaden (GOM) fr bananer infrdes 1993.
Its main objective was to harmonise and stabilise the market by means of various aid measures and to limit imports by introducing a tariff quota system. 
Den har frmst till syfte att harmonisera och stabilisera marknaden med hjlp av diverse stdtgrder och att begrnsa importen genom infrandet av tullkvoter.
Some producers received additional national financial support which was not notified to the Commission in advance. 
Vissa producenter har ftt ytterligare nationellt std som kommissionen inte ftt information om tidigare.
In addition, shortcomings were revealed in the documents provided in support of aid payments. V. The premium for final cessation of banana production had only limited impact. 
Dessutom har brister avsljats vad gller den dokumentation som skall styrka stdbetalningarna. V. Bidraget fr att slutligt upphra med bananproduktion har haft begrnsad betydelse.
Measures to regulate the market VI. 
Marknadsregleringstgrder VI.
The difference between world prices and Community prices results in what are known as Ôquota rentsŐ. 
Skillnaden mellan vrldsmarknadspriserna och gemenskapspriserna leder till en situation med Óquota rentÓ-frdelar.
At Member State level efficient quota management has been jeopardised by unsatisfactory customs practice and fraudulent imports. 
Bristande tullrutiner och bedrgerier vad gller import i medlemsstaterna har skapat risker fr att frvaltningen av kvoterna inte skall bli effektiv.
Developments and evaluation IX. 
Utveckling och utvrdering IX.
In doing this, its intention was to maintain adequate protection for producers in the EU and ACP (African, Caribbean and Pacific) States without affecting the volume of imports and with minimal impact on prices. 
Kommissionen nskade i detta fall bibehlla ett lmpligt skydd fr producenter inom EU och i AVS-lnderna (Afrika, Vstindien och Stillahavsomrdet) utan att ndra de importerade volymerna och utan alltfr stor pverkan p priserna.
X. The Commission is expected to produce a general evaluation of the CMO at the end of 2004. 
X. Kommissionen vntas utfra en vergripande utvrdering av GOM i slutet av 2004.
This should allow an overall assessment to be made of the consequences of the introduction of the CMO and the degree to which its initial objectives have been achieved. 
Den borde gra det mjligt att gra en sammanstllning av konsekvenserna av infrandet av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden och en uppskattning av i vilken grad de ursprungliga mlen har uppntts.
Conclusions and recommendations XI. 
Slutsatser och rekommendationer XI.
Shortcomings in the methods used to calculate reference prices and production prices have led to undue payment of compensatory aid and to financial corrections. 
Brister vad gller metoder i samband med berkningen av referenspriser och producentpriser har lett till utbetalning av kompensationsstd p felaktiga grunder och till finansiella korrigeringar.
The quota rent advantage derived from the tariff quota system by the multinationals operating in the market is approximately two to three times as great as the support given to EU and ACP growers (1). 
De Óquota rentÓ-frdelar som multinationella fretag p marknaden erhller genom tullkvotssystemet r tv till tre gnger strre n det std som ges till odlare i EU och i AVS-lnderna (1).
(1) The figures quoted by the Commission in their reply relate to the rate of quota rent of 200 euro per tonne estimated by them compared to the rate of income compensation aid of 383 euro per tonne for the year 2000 (see Annex 6). 
(1) De siffror som anges av kommissionen i deras svar gller en av dem uppskattad Óquota rentÓ p 200 euro per ton jmfrt med ett inkomstkompensationsstd p 383 euro per ton fr r 2000 (se bilaga 6).
The CourtŐs calculations are based on the total value of the quota rent in relation to the quota of 2 553 000 tonnes which is some 511 million euro. 
Revisionsrttens berkning baseras p det totala vrdet av Óquota rentÓ i frhllande till kvoten p 2 553 000 ton, vilket utgr ungefr 511 miljoner euro.
This is around two to three times the expenditure for income compensation aid in 1999 and 2000. 
Detta r 2Đ3 gnger mer n utgifterna fr inkomstkompensationsstdet 1999 och 2000.
C 294/3 
C 294/3
Furthermore, the import arrangements provided for under the CMO have proved susceptible to irregularities and significant weaknesses were found in import controls. 
Dessutom har det visat sig att GOM:s ordning fr import kan utsttas fr oegentligheter och betydande svagheter har konstaterats vad gller importkontroller.
As the Commission has committed itself to conducting its first major evaluation around 2004, it should ensure that it keeps to this timetable and that its analysis includes an evaluation of the synergy of the various types of support for the banana sector. 
Eftersom kommissionen har utlovat att den skall gra den frsta utvrderingen av betydelse omkring 2004, r det viktigt att tillse att denna tidsplan respekteras och att vaka ver att det ocks grs en utvrdering av synergier mellan olika stdformer fr bananer.
INTRODUCTION The issues at stake in the banana market 1. 
ALLMN RAM Frutsttningarna p bananmarknaden 1.
The Community consumes approximately four million tonnes of bananas every year but only produces 20 % of its requirements. 
Inom gemenskapen konsumeras omkring fyra miljoner ton bananer varje r, men endast 20 % av behovet produceras inom gemenskapen.
Approximately 60 % of the CommunityŐs supplies comes from Latin America (see Annex 1). 
Omkring 60 % av de bananer som konsumeras inom gemenskapen kommer frn Latinamerika (se bilaga 1).
These bananas, known as Ôdollar bananasŐ, are sold at prices below the price of those produced in the Community. The remaining 20 % comes from the ACP States. 
Dessa bananer som kallas dollarbananer sljs till lgre pris n de bananer som produceras inom gemenskapen. terstoden (20 %) kommer frn AVS-lnderna.
There are two large producer countries in the EU: Spain, where the autonomous region of the Canary Islands produces 400 000 tonnes per year, and France, where the overseas departments of Guadeloupe and Martinique produce 300 000 tonnes per year. 
Inom EU finns det tv viktiga producenter: Spanien, tack vare den autonoma regionen Kanariearna, 400 000 ton per r, och Frankrike, tack vare de utomeuropeiska departementen Guadeloupe och Martinique, 300 000 ton per r.
Over the period 1989 to 2000 Community production and imports of dollar bananas increased by approximately 6 %. 
Under perioden 1989Đ2000 har gemenskapens produktion och importen av dollarbananer kat med ungefr 6 %.
Prior to 1993 various import regimes existed in the Community, hampering the free circulation of bananas within the Community and constituting an obstacle to the establishment of a common system for trade with third countries. 
Fre 1993 fanns det olika ordningar fr bananimport inom gemenskapen, vilket hindrade den fria rrligheten inom gemenskapen och innebar ett hinder fr inrttandet av en gemensam ordning fr handel med tredje land.
Among the Member States that are producers of bananas, national market organisations applied quantitative import restrictions which created an obstacle to the single market. 
Slunda infrde nationella marknadsorganisationer i de bananproducerande lnderna kvantitativa restriktioner fr importen och hindrade drigenom frverkligandet av den gemensamma marknaden.
Among the Member States that are not producers, some gave priority to the marketing of bananas from ACP States while others had liberal importation rules. 
Bland icke bananproducerande medlemsstater gynnade vissa salufringen av bananer frn AVS-lnderna medan andra hade ett liberalt importsystem.
To achieve a single market, it was necessary to put in place a common market organisation (CMO) to replace the various national systems. In 1993 the common organisation of the market in bananas was therefore introduced by Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/1993 (1). 
Fr att kunna genomfra den gemensamma marknaden var det ndvndigt att infra en gemensam organisation av marknaden som ersatte de olika nationella organisationerna. r 1993 infrdes den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr bananer genom rdets frordning (EEG) nr 404/1993 (1).
The aims and implementation of the CMO (b) free movement of bananas within the Community and implementation of a common regime for trade with third countries; (c) ensuring adequate incomes for EU producers and for traditional suppliers in the ACP (African, Caribbean and Pacific) States and fair prices for consumers; (d) through the creation of producer organisations, improving the efficiency of production and maximisation of earnings from bananas produced in the Community. 
Mlen fr och genomfrandet av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden b) fri rrlighet inom gemenskapen och infrandet av en gemensam ordning fr utbyte med tredje land, c) att tillfrskra producenterna inom EU och traditionella leverantrer frn AVS-lnderna (Afrika, Vstindien och Stillahavsomrdet) tillrckliga inkomster till priser som r rimliga fr konsumenterna, d) att frbttra produktionseffektiviteten och att i s hg grad som mjligt ka inkomsterna frn bananer som produceras inom gemenskapen tack vare skapandet av producentorganisationer.
The legislator thus sought to establish a balance between the separate, and contradictory, interests that existed prior to 1993. 
Lagstiftaren har allts skt att uppn en jmvikt mellan de motstridiga och klart avgrnsade intressen som fanns fre 1993.
To achieve these objectives, the Regulation introduced a number of measures: (a) compensatory aid (i.e. a premium per tonne of bananas marketed) to balance out any subsequent loss of income; this aid is granted to EU producers with the aim of placing them in an equivalent position to that which existed prior to the introduction of the CMO; (b) a single premium (per hectare) granted to Community producers who cease to produce bananas where other crops prove more appropriate; (c) the introduction of a Community tariff quota system for the marketing of bananas produced in third countries and ACP States; (d) temporary aid to encourage the setting up of producer organisations and to facilitate the administration of them during the start-up phase; (e) aid granted in the context of operational programmes for regions eligible for assistance from the Structural Funds, with the aim of increasing competitiveness and improving the use of resources in the banana sector. 
Detta std ges till EU:s producenter och syftar till att likstlla deras situation med situationen innan GOM infrdes. b) Ett engngsbidrag (per hektar) som ges till producenter inom gemenskapen som upphr med bananodling d andra grdor visar sig vara lmpligare. c) Infrandet av ett gemenskapssystem med tullkvoter fr salufrandet av bananer som produceras av producenter i tredje land och i AVS-lnderna. d) Ett tillflligt std fr att uppmuntra bildandet av producentorganisationer och fr att inledningsvis underltta deras administration. e) Ett std som ges inom ramen fr operativa program fr regioner som r berttigade till att erhlla strukturfondsmedel och som skall ka konkurrenskraften och frbttra resursanvndningen inom banansektorn.
The first two measures are wholly financed through the European Agricultural Guarantee and Guidance Fund (EAGGF), Guarantee Section, and comprise interventions designed to regulate the market. 
De tv frsta tgrderna finansieras helt och hllet av Europeiska utvecklings-och garantifonden fr jordbruket, garantisektionen (EUGFJ-garanti) och bestr av interventioner som skall reglera marknaden.
Since 1 January 2002 the start-up aid for producer groups has been co-financed by the EAGGF Guarantee Section. 
Frn och med den 1 januari 2002 har start-bidraget fr producentsammanslutningarna samfinansierats av garantisektionen vid EUGFJ.
28.11.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 294/5 Commission) through one of the four Structural Funds, i.e. the EAGGF Guidance Section. 
28.11.2002 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 294/5 samfinansierade (medlemsstaterna och kommissionen) av en av de fyra strukturfonderna, EUGFJ-utveckling.
In addition to the basic Council Regulation creating a common organisation of the market in the banana sector (see paragraph 3), the Commission adopted implementing rules including those for (3): (a) the arrangements for importing bananas into the Community (4); (b) how these measures were managed by the Member States and monitored and evaluated by the Commission; (c) to what extent the objectives of the CMO were attained. 
Frutom den grundfrordning som antogs av rdet om den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr bananer (se punkt 3) har tillmpningsfreskrifter antagits av kommissionen srskiltfr(3) a) ordningen fr import av bananer till gemenskapen (4), b) kompensationsstdet fr bananer (5), och c) systemet med tullkvoter fr jordbruksprodukter (6). 8.
A secondary objective was to analyse the reasons why the banana import arrangements, from the viewpoint of the tariff quota system, had led to appeals to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and tariff retaliation by the United States of America. 
Ett sekundrt ml var att analysera sklen till att ord-ningenfrimportavbananer,vadgllersystemetmedtullkvoter, hade lett till verklagande infr Vrldshandelsorganisationen (WTO) och till tullrepressalier frn Frenta staternas sida.
The audit therefore examined: (a) the effectiveness of the import arrangements as a means of regulating the market and their compliance with international trade rules; (b) the use made of import licences in connection with these arrangements and their impact on the market; (c) the effectiveness of physical checks on imports and the reality of the corresponding collection of related own resources. 
Under granskningenundersktes a) hur effektiv ordningen fr import r fr regleringen av marknaden och i vilken mn den verensstmmer med reglerna fr internationell handel, b) hur man anvnder de importlicenser som hr ihop med ordningen och deras effekt p marknaden, c) hur effektiva de fysiska kontrollerna av importen r och om motsvarande egna medel uppbrs.
The audit focused on the management, in 1999, of the system of compensatory aid in Spain and France. 
Revisionen koncentreras p frvaltningen 1999 av systemet med kompensationsstd i Spanien och Frankrike.