natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Under these systems it was possible for public entities to claim personnel costs for civil servants or public officials, even in cases where the people concerned had not been explicitly seconded to the project, which is what would have been required by national law. 
Med dessa system blev det mjligt fr offentliga organ att begra ersttning fr personalkostnader fr tjnstemn eller andra offentliganstllda ven nr de aktuella personerna inte uttryckligen hade frflyttats till projektet, vilket skulle ha krvts enligt den nationella lagstiftningen.
Those costs were not directly borne by the participant and therefore should not be eligible for Community support. 
Dessa kostnader betalades inte direkt av deltagaren och berttigade drfr inte heller till gemenskapsstd.
In FP6 costs already financed through national budgets may be reimbursed as eligible costs if these resources are at the free disposal of the participating legal entity (2). 
I sjtte ramprogrammet kan kostnader som redan betalas genom nationella budgetar ersttas som stdberttigande kostnader om det deltagande rttssubjektet fritt fogar ver dessa medel (2).
In the long term the risk of reimbursing costs already funded by a Member State is that the Community financial contribution replaces rather than complements national research funding. 
P lng sikt r risken med att erstta kostnader som redan finansierats av en medlemsstat att det ekonomiska bidraget frn gemenskapen erstter snarare n kompletterar den nationella finansieringen av forskning.
Principle of joint and several liability as initially proposed by the Commission limited by Council and Parliament 42. 
Principen om solidariskt ansvar enligt kommissionens ursprungliga frslag har begrnsats av rdet och Europaparlamentet 42.
The Court also recommended that each participant in a consortium should bear joint and several liability for the use made of the Community financial contribution to the indirect RTD (1) Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999); Commission Regulation (EC) No 1685/2000 of 28 July 2000 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 as regards eligibility of expenditure of operations co-financed by the Structural Funds (OJ L 193, 29.7.2000): in particular Eligibility rules No 1 ÔExpenditure actually paid outŐ and No 11 2 ÔCosts incurred in managing and implementing the Structural FundsŐ. () Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002); Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002): Article 165 ÔNo profit ruleŐ (Article 109(2) of the Financial Regulation); Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 concerning the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in, and for the dissemination of research results for, the implementation of the European Community Sixth Framework Programme (2002 to 2006), in particular Articles 8 and 14 (OJ L 355, 30.12.2002); Commission Decision (C(2003) 3834, 23 October 2003) modifying Commission Decision C(2003) 799 of 17 March 2003, establishing a model contract for the implementation of the sixth framework programme of the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community (2002 to 2006), and the Commission Decision C(2003) 2567 of 18 July 2003, establishing a derived model contract for the actions aiming at the promotion and development of human resources and mobility for the implementation of the sixth framework programme of the European Community (2002 to 2006). action (with the exception of participants such as public universities, which cannot for legal reasons be held jointly and severally liable) (3). 
Revisionsrtten rekommenderade ocks att varje deltagare i ett konsortium br ha solidariskt ansvar fr anvndningen av gemenskapens ekonomiska bidrag till den indirekta FoTU-(1) Rdets frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999 av den 21 juni 1999 om allmnna bestmmelser fr strukturfonderna (EGT L 161, 26.6.1999); kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 1685/2000 av den 28 juli 2000 om nrmare bestmmelser fr genomfrandet av rdets frordning (EG) nr 1260/1999 avseende stdberttigande utgifter i samband med insatser som medfinansieras av strukturfonderna (EGT L193, 29.7.2000), srskilt regel 1 om stdberttigande utgifter ÓFaktiskt betalda utgifterÓ och regel 11 ÓKostnader som uppsttt vid frvaltning och genomfrande av strukturfondernaÓ.
The principle of joint and several liability of participants was explicitly contained in Article 13 of the CommissionŐs amended proposal for rules on participation and dissemination of results for FP6. 
Principen om deltagares solidariska ansvar angavs tydligt i artikel 13 i kommissionen ndrade frslag till regler fr deltagande i och spridning av resultat i frga om sjtte ramprogrammet.
The liability was then limited at the request of the Council and Parliament. 
Ansvaret begrnsades sedan p begran av rdet och parlamentet.
As in FP5, the technical implementation of the indirect RTD action remains the collective responsibility of the participants under FP6 and the financial liability is limited to each participantŐs share up to a maximum of the total payments received (4). 
Liksom i femte ramprogrammet har deltagarna i sjtte ramprogrammet fortfarande gemensamt ansvar fr det tekniska genomfrandet av indirekta FoTU-tgrder, och det ekonomiska ansvaret r begrnsat till varje deltagares andel, dock inte med ett hgre belopp n det som betalats ut till vederbrande (4).
CourtŐs recommendation on sanctions retained by Council and Parliament 43. 
Rdet och Europaparlamentet har tagit fasta p revisionsrttens rekommendationer om sanktioner 43.
FP6 fully implements the CourtŐs recommendation for strengthening the protection of the CommunityŐs financial interests by providing for the possibility of imposing sanctions according to Council Regulation No 2988/95 (5). 
I sjtte ramprogrammet infrs fullt ut revisionsrttens rekommendationer om att frstrka skyddet av gemenskapens ekonomiska intressen genom att det ges mjlighet att dma ut sanktioner i enlighet med rdets frordning nr 2988/95 (5).
Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 entitles the Commission to recover the amount unduly paid, and, in addition, to fine a contractor who is found to have overstated costs and who has consequently received an unjustified financial contribution. 
I artikel 20 i frordning (EG) nr 2321/2002 ges kommissionen rtt att terkrva det belopp som felaktigt betalats ut och att dessutom utdma bter till en avtalspart som befinns ha deklarerat fr hga kostnader och som till fljd av detta har erhllit ett oberttigat ekonomiskt bidrag.
Key problems related to audit certificates remain to be solved 44. 
Det terstr att lsa krnproblem i anslutning till revisionsintyg 44.
Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 2321/2002 follows previous Court recommendations by requiring the certification of financial statements for FP6 indirect RTD actions by an external auditor or, in the case of public bodies, by a competent public officer (6). 
Artikel 14 i frordning (EG) nr 2321/2002 fljer revisionsrttens tidigare rekommendationer och krver att en extern revisor, eller nr det gller offentliga organ en behrig tjnsteman, skall attestera rsredovisningarna inom sjtte ramprogrammet (6).
The model contract for FP6 defines the scope of this audit as the certification that Ô[...] the costs incurred during that period meet the conditions required by the contractŐ. 
I standardkontraktet fr sjtte ramprogrammet anges att det genom revisionen skall intygas att de kostnader som uppkommit under perioden uppfyller villkoren i kontraktet.
The auditors are selected and paid for by the contractor, and the resulting audit certificate is subsequently submitted to the Commission. 
Revisorerna vljs ut och betalas av avtalsparten, och det utfrdade revisionsintyget verlmnas till kommissionen.
The cost of these audit certificates is entirely reimbursed by the Community (within the limits established by the contract). 
Kostnaderna fr dessa revisionsintyg erstts helt av gemenskapen (inom de grnser som faststllts i kontraktet).
The Commission carried out two pilot actions on audit certificates during FP5. 
Kommissionen genomfrde tv pilottgrder om revisionsintyg under femte ramprogrammet.
However, the effectiveness and reliability of audit certificates were not assessed in time for the Commission to identify lessons to be learnt in preparation for FP6. 
Det gjordes emellertid inte ngon bedmning av revisionsintygens ndamlsenlighet och tillfrlitlighet i tid fr att kommissionen skulle kunna dra nytta av lrdomarna i utarbetandet av sjtte ramprogrammet.
(3) (4) (5) (6) Annual report concerning the financial year 2001, paragraph 4.50; Special Report ÔFisheries, agricultural and agro-industry researchŐ No 9/99, paragraph 117. 
(3) rsrapport fr budgetret 2001 (punkt 4.50); srskild rapport nr 9/ 99 om forskningsverksamhet inom jordbruk och fiske, punkt 117.
Article 13.2 ÔExecution of indirect actionsŐ of Regulation (EC) No 2321/ 2002 provides only for each participant being Ô[...] liable for the use of the Community financial contribution in proportion to his share of the project up to a maximum of the total payments he has receivedŐ. 
(4) I artikel 13.2 ÓGenomfrande av indirekta tgrderÓ i frordning (EG) nr 2321/2001 anges endast att varje deltagare skall vara Ó(...) ansvarig fr anvndningen av gemenskapens ekonomiska bidrag i frhllande till sin andel av projektet, dock inte med ett hgre belopp n det som betalats ut till vederbrandeÓ.
Annual report concerning the financial year 2001, paragraph 4.51; Annual report concerning the financial year 2000, paragraph 4.40 (OJ C 359, 15.12.2001); Special Report ÔFisheries, Agricultural and Agro-Industry ResearchŐ No 9/99, paragraph 117. 
(5) rsrapport fr budgetret 2001, punkt 4.51; rsrapport fr budgetret 2000 (EGT C 359, 15.12.2002), punkt 4.40; srskild rapport nr 9/99 om forskningsverksamhet inom jordbruk och fiske, punkt 117.
Special Report ÔJoule-ThermieŐ No 17/98; Annual report concerning the financial year 2001, paragraph 4.48. 
(6) Srskild rapport nr 17/98 om std till frnybara energikllor (Joule-Thermie), rsrapport fr budgetret 2001, punkt 4.48.
C 99/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 23.4.2004 45. 
C 99/14 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 23.4.2004 45.
Unlike in FP5, participants in FP6 indirect RTD actions are only required to report total costs incurred by activity, without giving any further details on the nature of the expenditure (for instance on personnel costs and hours spent). 
Till skillnad frn i femte ramprogrammet krvs av deltagare i indirekta FoTU-tgrder enligt sjtte ramprogrammet att de endast rapporterar totalkostnaderna per verksamhet, utan att lmna ytterligare information om typ av utgift (till exempel personalkostnader och timtgng).
However, this reliance is currently compromised as several essential conditions have not yet been met: Ń the FP6 model contract only specifies the basic level of qualification of the auditor (1). 
Detta beroende undergrvs dock fr nrvarande eftersom flera vsentliga villkor nnu inte r uppfyllda: Ń I sjtte ramprogrammets standardkontrakt anges endast vilka grundlggande kvalifikationer revisorn mste ha (1).
However, the Commission has not yet clearly defined the scope and extent of the audit work to be done (2). 
Kommissionen har emellertid nnu inte tydligt angett grnserna fr och omfattningen av det granskningsarbete som skall utfras (2).
Without the definition of those essential aspects by the Commission there remains a considerable risk that the audit certificates will be insufficient to ensure effective control over payments based on financial statements, Ń for audit certificates to become an effective control mechanism, the Commission must also assure itself that external auditors are carrying out their verifications in an independent manner. 
Om kommissionen inte definierar dessa vsentliga aspekter r risken fortsatt stor fr att revisionsintygen inte rcker till fr att skerstlla en effektiv kontroll av utbetalningar som grs p grundval av redovisningar. Ń Fr att revisionsintyg skall bli ett effektivt kontrollverktyg mste kommissionen ocks vertyga sig om att externa revisorer genomfr sina kontroller p ett oberoende stt.
In particular the Commission should define a strategy on how to verify, on a case-by-case basis, that the audit certificates submitted were produced in compliance with these minimum requirements and generally applicable professional standards. 
Kommissionen mste i synnerhet ta fram en strategi fr hur den skall kontrollera, frn fall till fall, att de inlmnade revisionsintygen har tagits fram i enlighet med dessa minimikrav och allmnt tillmpliga yrkesnormer.
Management structure, procedures and methods for the implementation of FP5 Coherence of programme and organisational structure Joint management of the seven FP5 programmes by five Directorates-General 46. 
Frvaltningsstruktur, frvaltningsfrfaranden och frvaltningsmetoder fr genomfrandet av femte ramprogrammet verensstmmelse mellan programmets och organisationens struktur Fem generaldirektorat frvaltar gemensamt de sju programmen inom femte ramprogrammet 46.
Indirect actions of FP5 are administered by five Directorates-General, excluding the CommissionŐs Joint Research Centre (see paragraph 3). 
De indirekta tgrderna inom femte ramprogrammet frvaltas av fem generaldirektorat, med undantag fr Gemensamma forskningscentret vid kommissionen (se punkt 3).
These five Directorates-General report to four Members of the Commission, with the Commissioner in charge of Directorate-General for Information Society also being (1) Under FP6 each contractor is free to choose its auditor provided that the external auditor is independent from the contractor and that the auditor is qualified to carry out statutory audits of accounting documents in accordance with the eighth Council Directive 84/253/EEC of 10 April 1984 or similar national regulations. 
Dessa fem generaldirektorat rapporterar till fyra ledamter av kommissionen, och kommissionren med ansvar fr generaldirektoratet fr informationssamhllet ansvarar ven fr generaldirektoratet fr (1) Inom sjtte ramprogrammet kan varje avtalspart fritt vlja revisor under frutsttning att den externa revisorn r fristende frn avtalsparten, och att revisorn har behrighet att utfra lagstadgad revision av rkenskaper i enlighet med rdets ttonde direktiv 84/253/EEG av den 10 april 1984 eller motsvarande nationella bestmmelser.
(2) For instance minimal requirements on materiality and confidence level, type of audit work, documentation of audit work, format and content of contradictory report between auditor and auditee, right of access by the Commission to auditorŐs working papers. in charge of Directorate-General for Enterprise. 
(2) Till exempel minimikrav p vsentlighetsniv och skerhetsgrad, typ av granskningsarbete, dokumentation av granskningsarbetet, utformning och innehll i den kontradiktoriska rapporten mellan revisor och den som granskas, och kommissionens rtt att ta del av revisorns arbetsdokument. nringsliv.
This compares to seven Directorates-General co-managing indirect RTD actions under FP4 (3). 
Detta kan jmfras med de sju generaldirektorat som gemensamt frvaltade indirekta FoTU-tgrder inom fjrde ramprogrammet (3).
Historically this joint management reflects the aim of supporting the CommissionŐs policy objectives within the different areas and generating input from the research activities for future Community initiatives. 
Bakgrunden till denna gemensamma frvaltning r en nskan att stdja kommissionens strategiska ml p de olika omrdena och att bidra med resultat frn forskningsverksamheten till framtida gemenskapsinitiativ.
Except for the programme ÔUser-friendly information societyŐ and the environment part of the programme ÔEnvironment, energy and sustainable developmentŐ, all thematic programmes are operated by more than one Directorate-General (4). 
Med undantag fr programmen fr ÓEtt anvndarvnligt informationssamhlleÓ och ÓEnergi, milj och hllbar utvecklingÓ verkstlls alla tematiska program av mer n ett generaldirektorat (4).
When preparing FP5, the Commission intended that two Directorates-General, Research and Information Society, should be in charge of FP5 implementation, but with parts of the thematic programmes being co-managed by other Directorates-General. 
Vid utarbetandet av femte ramprogrammet var kommissionens avsikt att tv generaldirektorat, forskning respektive informationssamhllet, skulle ansvara fr genomfrandet av femte ramprogrammet, dr dock frvaltningen skulle delas med andra generaldirektorat nr det gllde delar av de tematiska programmen.
Thematic programmes were thus fragmented across Commission services. 
De tematiska programmen splittrades slunda mellan kommissionens enheter.
While the partition of contract and project administration for a programme between Directorates-General resulted in a multiplication of support functions, no evidence was found that this organisational structure added value to the management of the scientific aspects of these programmes. 
Samtidigt som uppdelningen av frvaltningen av ett programs kontrakt och projekt mellan generaldirektorat resulterade i en dubblering av stdfunktioner, ptrffades inga bevis fr att denna organisatoriska struktur skapade ngot mervrde i frvaltningen av dessa programs vetenskapliga aspekter.
The Commission justified the creation of a second, largely independent ÔpoleŐ at Directorate-General for Information Society by the rapid evolution of information and communication technologies and their linkage to associated norms, standards and regulations which are also dealt with by this department. 
Kommissionen motiverade skapandet av en andra, i stor utstrckning sjlvstndig ÓpolÓ vid generaldirektoratet fr informationssamhllet med den snabba utvecklingen av informations-och kommunikationstekniker och deras koppling till tillhrande normer, standarder och bestmmelser som ocks handlggs av denna avdelning.
However the argument of scientific specificity and link to a specific regulatory framework also applies to other research fields, such as life sciences. 
Argumentet om vetenskaplig specificitet och kopplingar till en specifik rttslig ram gller emellertid ven andra forskningsomrden, ssom biovetenskap.
Furthermore, the management requirements of research programmes are largely independent of the scientific area covered. 
Vidare r frvaltningskraven fr forskningsprogram i hg grad oberoende av vilket vetenskapsomrde det gller.
(3) 4 ( ) This reduction is due to the merger of Directorates-General for Energy and Transport as at 1 January 2000 and the transfer of agricultural research activities (which were managed by Directorate-General for Agriculture under the FP4 programme ÔFisheries, agricultural and agro-industry researchŐ) to Directorate-General for Research. 
(3) Minskningen beror p sammanslagningen av generaldirektoraten fr energi och fr transport den 1 januari 2000, och p verfringen av forskning p jordbruksomrdet (som frvaltades av generaldirektoratet fr jordbruk i programmet fr forskning rrande fiske, jordbruk och agro-industri inom fjrde ramprogrammet) till generaldirektoratet fr forskning.
While the programme ÔQuality of life and management of living resourcesŐ is operated by Directorates-General for Research and Fisheries, the programmes ÔCompetitive and sustainable growthŐ and the non-nuclear energy strand of the programme ÔEnvironment, energy and sustainable developmentŐ are managed by Directorates-General for Research and Energy and Transport. 
(4) Programmet fr ÓFrbttrad livskvalitet och frvaltning av levande resurserÓ verkstlls av generaldirektoraten fr forskning och fiske, medan programmen ÓKonkurrenskraftig och hllbar tillvxtÓ och delen om icke-nukler energi inom programmet fr ÓEnergi, milj och hllbar utvecklingÓ frvaltas av generaldirektoraten fr forskning samt energi och transport.
In addition, as regards the three horizontal programmes, also the programme ÔPromotion of innovation and encouragement of small and medium-sized enterprises participationŐ is operated by Directorates-General for Research and Enterprise. 
Dessutom, nr det gller de tre vergripande programmen, verkstlls programmet fr ÓFrmjande av innovativ verksamhet och uppmuntran till sm och medelstora fretag till att medverka i dennaÓ ocks av generaldirektoraten fr forskning och nringsliv.
The programmes ÔImproving the human research potential and the socioeconomic knowledge baseŐ and ÔConfirming the International role of Community researchŐ are carried out within Directorate-General for Research only. 
Programmen ÓFrstrkning av den mnskliga forskningspotentialen och den socioekonomiska kunskapsbasenÓ och ÓFrstrkning av gemenskapsforskningens internationella rollÓ frvaltas enbart av generaldirektoratet fr forskning.
23.4.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 99/15 Split of programmes goes against the intended design of single research programmes 49. 
23.4.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 99/15 Att dela upp programmen strider mot den avsedda utformningen av enskilda forskningsprogram 49.
Each thematic programme was designed as a single entity around which appropriate management structures were to be constructed. 
Varje tematiskt program utformades som en enskild enhet runt vilken en lmplig frvaltningsstruktur skulle byggas upp.
However, as pointed out above, almost all thematic programmes were co-managed by different Directorates-General, thus effectively creating separate management structures. 
Ssom ppekats ovan frvaltades emellertid nstan samtliga tematiska program gemensamt av olika generaldirektorat, vilket i praktiken innebr att det skapades separata frvaltningsstrukturer.
Moreover, at Directorates-General for Research (1), Information Society (2) and Energy and Transport (3), specific programmes were also split between directorates. 
Vid generaldirektoraten fr forskning (1), informationssamhllet (2) samt energi och transport (3) var dessutom de srskilda programmen uppdelade mellan direktorat.
The split of programmes goes against the intended design of single research programmes. 
Uppdelningen av programmen strider mot den avsedda utformningen av enskilda forskningsprogram.
Its main drawback is inefficiencies caused by duplication of effort. 
Den strsta nackdelen r den ineffektivitet som orsakas av dubbelarbete.
For instance, the reorganisation of Directorate-General for Research in 2001, by creating largely autonomous directorates operating parts of specific programmes increased the number of administrative and financial units from five to nine. 
Exempelvis har omorganisationen 2001 av generaldirektoratet fr forskning, d det skapades direktorat som i stor utstrckning sjlvstndigt verkstller delar av srskilda program, kat antalet administrativa och ekonomiska enheter frn fem till nio.
This meant that available officials at Directorate-General for Research with the necessary capacities in administrative and financial matters were spread between nearly twice the number of units. 
Detta innebar att tillgngliga tjnstemn vid generaldirektoratet fr forskning med ndvndiga kvalifikationer i administration och ekonomi spreds ut mellan nstan dubbla antalet enheter.