natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C 54/44 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.3.2005 In ÔapplicationŐ of the OIE code a country may regain its previous disease-and infection-free status Ôthree months after the last case where a stamping-out policy and serological surveillance are applied....Ő With the last outbreak in the United Kingdom in September 2001 and the first meeting of the appropriate Commission of the OIE in January 2002, the United Kingdom was recognised as free of the disease by the OIE at the earliest opportunity. 
C 54/44 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 3.3.2005 I enlighet med OIE:s regler kan ett land terf sin tidigare status som sjukdoms-och smittofritt tre mnader efter det sista fallet, frutsatt att en utrotningspolicy och serologisk vervakning till-lmpas. Eftersom det sista utbrottet i Frenade kungariket skedde i september 2001 och det frsta sammantrdet i OIE:s behriga kommitt gde rum i januari 2002, frklarades Frenade kungariket mul-och klvsjukefritt av OIE s snart som det var mjligt.
The other three Member States affected by FMD also regained their free status within three months of the last outbreak or the slaughter of the last vaccinated animals respectively. 
P samma stt fick de andra tre medlemsstaterna som drabbades av sjukdomen tillbaka sin sjukdomsfria status tre mnader efter det sista utbrottet respektive efter slakten av det sista vaccinerade djuret.
Despite some initial problems with certain trade partners the regionalisation of the EU on the basis of Member States was quickly re-installed and trade resumed from Member States not affected by the disease. 
Trots ngra initiala problem med vissa handelspartner terinfrdes regionaliseringen av EU efter medlemsstat snabbt, och handeln terupptogs frn de medlemsstater som inte drabbats av sjukdomen.
The EU as a whole was therefore not blocked for all products for a period of 12 months. 
Drfr var EU som helhet inte avskuret med avseende p alla produkter i tolv mnader.
Council Decision 90/424/EEC clearly relates the compensation for farmers to the animals that had been killed for disease control purposes. 
I rdets beslut 90/424/EEG anges klart och tydligt hur ersttning skall ske till gare vars djur slaktats p grund av sjukdomsbekmpning.
This requirement encourages farmers to report the disease as early as possible for financial reasons. 
Kravet uppmuntrar lantbrukarna att anmla sjukdomen s tidigt som mjligt av ekonomiska skl.
Farmers are also sanctioned if they disobey veterinary restrictions on movement of animals and products, and the basic provisions for Member States imposing such sanctions are laid down for in vertical and horizontal Community legislation. 
Drfr r det viktigt att ersttningen betalas ut i tid och r tillrcklig och rttvis fr att jordbruksnringen skall samarbeta. P motsvarande stt sanktioneras lantbrukare som struntar i veterinra restriktioner p transporter av djur och animaliska produkter.
The Commission shares the CourtŐs view that even more precise directives to the Member States are required for shouldering the burden of indemnification expenditure. 
Kommissionen instmmer i revisionsrttens uppfattning att ansvaret fr ersttningen br regleras nrmare i direktiv fr medlemsstaterna.
A draft regulation formalising the arrangements for granting Community co-funding will be presented to the Member States soon. 
Ett utkast till frordning om exakt under vilka omstndigheter gemenskapen kan trda in som medfinansir kommer snart att lggas fram fr medlemsstaterna.
At present, all the files have been closed except for the one relating to operating costs in the United Kingdom (for which the application for reimbursement was presented only in 2003) and corresponding reimbursements were made as soon as the financial checks, which were intensified owing to the amounts involved and the complexity of the file, had been completed. 
Fr nrvarande har alla renden utom ett avslutats, nmligen det om driftskostnader i Frenade kungariket (vars begran om ersttning inte lmnades in frrn 2003), och motsvarande terbetalningar utfrts efter utvidgade kontroller p grund av beloppens storlek och rendets komplexitet.
The results of these checks were that applications for almost EUR 583 million, or 55 % of the total, were rejected without prompting any dispute with the Member States. 
Kontrollerna ledde till att kommissionen utan invndningar frn medlemsstaterna vgrade att utbetala nra 583 miljoner euro, dvs. 55 % av det totala begrda beloppet.
The discrepancies ascertained by the Court are a result of the Member StatesŐ practices which the Commission has no legal authority to harmonise. 
De olikheter som revisionsrtten nmner beror p olika rutiner i medlemsstaterna, ngot som kommissionen inte r juridiskt kompetent att harmonisera.
Moreover, it is stated under point 70 that any accumulation of premiums and indemnifications should be prohibited explicitly. 
Dessutom sgs under punkt 70 att dubbelbetalningar av bidrag och ersttningar br frbjudas uttryckligt.
The system of direct payments, including the slaughtering premium, is designed to compensate for the effect on producersŐ income of the gradual reduction of the level of market support introduced by the Agenda 2000 reform. 
Systemet med direkta betalningar, bl.a. slaktbidrag, r avsett att kompensera jordbrukarna fr det successivt minskade marknadsstdet enligt reformen Agenda 2000.
The Commission holds that it has learned the financial lessons of each disease, first by establishing an increasingly precise framework for eligible expenditure and now by looking at ways to simplify the rules. 
Kommissionen anser i sjlva verket att den dragit ekonomiska lrdomar av alla epizootier, tidigare genom att utforma noggrannare villkor fr vilka utgifter som berttigar till ersttning och nu genom att satsa p att frenkla reglerna.
Although the Council has decided that the Member States should benefit from Community financial support to eradicate the disease, this does not alter the fact that the specific financing decisions adopted by the Commission after receiving a request for reimbursement (the general framework is mentioned in Council Decision 90/424/EC) point out that this is contingent on the planned action being taken immediately, such as isolation of the holding from the time of suspicion and, following official confirmation of the disease: Ń slaughter of animals of susceptible species, Ń their destruction, Ń destruction of contaminated feed or materials, Ń cleaning, disinfestation and disinfection of the holding and equipment, Ń setting up of protection zones. 
Om rdet har beslutat att medlemsstaterna skall f bidrag frn gemenskapen fr att utrota en sjukdom, anger kommissionen i sina enskilda finansieringsbeslut som fattas nr en anskan om terbetalning lmnats in nrmare vilka tgrder (de allmnna villkoren anges i rdets beslut 90/424/EEG) som skall vidtas, t.ex. isolering av platsen s fort misstanke om sjukdomen uppstr och, efter den officiella bekrftelsen p sjukdomen: Ń slakt av djur av mottagliga arter, Ń destruktion av dem, Ń destruktion av smittat foder och smittade redskap, Ń rengring, insektsbekmpning och desinficering av anlggningarna och redskapen p anlggningarna, Ń upprttande av skyddszoner (...).
Moreover, on the strength of the experience gained in the classical swine fever epidemic in the Netherlands in 1997 (and, a posteriori, the positive judgment delivered by the Court of Justice at the end of 2003 in the case between the Commission and the Netherlands authorities on the financial corrections made to the request for reimbursement) and its desire to protect Community financial interests, the Commission deliberately laid down more stringent criteria for eligibility of expenditure in the financing decisions applicable to FMD. 
Vidare har kommissionen, styrkt av sin erfarenhet av den omfattande epizootin av klassisk svinpest i Nederlnderna 1997 (och sedan dess styrkt av domstolens positiva dom i slutet av 2003 i tvisten mellan kommissionen och de nederlndska myndigheterna om den korrektionskoefficient som kommissionen tillmpade p anskan om ersttning) och av omsorg om gemenskapens ekonomiska intressen, avsiktligt utformat strngare kriterier fr vilka utgifter som r bidragsberttigande i finansieringsbesluten med anknytning till mul-och klvsjuka.
These criteria were approved by the States concerned through the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health. 
Kriterierna har godknts av de berrda medlemsstaterna genom Kommittn fr livsmedelskedjan och djurhlsa.
Nevertheless, the Commission also learned the lessons of monitoring expenditure on FMD. 
Kommissionen har ocks dragit lrdom av kontrollerna av utgifterna fr bekmpning av mul-och klvsjuka.
3.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 54/45 As it is always at pains to protect the CommunityŐs financial interests and also to simplify monitoring for both the Commission and the Member States, the Commission will shortly present a draft regulation laying down the expenditure that is eligible for Community funding. (c) As indicated above, the Commission will shortly present a draft regulation laying down expenditure that is eligible for Community funding. 
3.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 54/45 Kommissionen strvar efter att skydda gemenskapens ekonomiska intressen och ven att frenkla kontrollerna bde fr kommissionen och fr de kontrollerade medlemsstaterna, varfr kommissionen inom kort kommer att lgga fram ett utkast till frordning om vilka utgifter som berttigar till gemenskapsbidrag. c) Som sgs ovan kommer kommissionen inom kort att lgga fram ett utkast till frordning om vilka utgifter som berttigar till gemenskapsbidrag.
The ban on export of live animals and their products was introduced on 21 February 2001. 
Frbudet mot export av levande djur och produkter av dem infrdes den 21 februari 2001.
The United Kingdom had therefore some initial problems to provide all the information to recipient Member States for the exports of sheep before that date in relation to holdings of origin that were subsequently, given an incubation period of about a fortnight, identified as outbreaks. 
Frenade kungariket hade ngra problem i inledningsskedet med att lmna alla uppgifter till de medlemsstater som tagit emot exporterade fr fre det datumet frn grdar som senare, med en inkubationstid p tv veckor, identifierades som utbrott.
By adopting Decision 2001/190/EC on 8 March 2001, the Commission approved the measures already taken by the Member States, including the pre-emptive killing of all sheep imported from the United Kingdom between 1 and 21 February 2001. 
Genom beslut 2001/190/EG av den 8 mars 2001 godknde kommissionen medlemsstaternas tidigare vidtagna tgrder, bl.a. frebyggande slakt av alla fr som importerats frn Frenade kungariket mellan den 1 och 21 februari 2001.
The problems relating to the tracing of these animals were thereby solved. 
P s stt lstes problemen med att spra dessa djur.
The first outbreak was confirmed on 20 February 2001 at the abattoir in Essex. 
Det frsta utbrottet bekrftades den 20 februari 2001 p slakteriet i Essex.
On 21 February 2001 the second outbreak was confirmed on the farm next to the abattoir and on 22 February another outbreak, both related to the movement of animals from the slaughterhouse to the farm and subsequent contacts. 
Den 21 februari 2001 bekrftades det andra utbrottet p en grd nra slakteriet och den 22 februari ytterligare ett utbrott, vilka bgge berodde p transport av djur frn slakteriet till grden och kontakter drefter.
All these outbreaks have per se no epidemiological importance with regard to the 2001 FMD epidemic, as they were marginal and dead-end events. 
Dessa utbrott hade i sig ingen epidemiologisk betydelse fr mul-och klvsjukeepi-zootin 2001, eftersom de var marginella hndelser som inte ledde vidare.
106. (a) As control strategies must be scrutinised on a regular basis, Article 72(10) of Council Directive 2003/85/EC contains specific provisions on contingency planning, real-time exercises and in particular reporting to the Commission about the main findings of these exercises and the necessary adjustments to the contingency plans. 
106. a) Eftersom bekmpningsstrategierna mste ses ver regelbundet sgs i artikel 72.10 i rdets direktiv 2003/85/EG att beredskapsplaner skall uppdateras och beredskapsvningar i realtid genomfras.
In addition, the Commission is following closely the FMD situation in the world and the development of the relevant chapter in the OIE Animal Health Code. 
Sedan skall medlemsstaterna rapportera till kommissionen om vad man kommit fram till under beredskapsv-ningarna och vilka ndringar av beredskapsplanerna som krvs. Dessutom fljer kommissionen noga mul-och klv-sjukelget i vrlden och utvecklingen av det relevanta kapitlet i OIE:s djurhlsoregler.
Commission funding of major research projects on FMD has been agreed in recent months and this will contribute to the development of the legislation where necessary. 
Kommissionens bidrag till omfattande forskningsprojekt om mul-och klvsjuka har godknts helt nyligen, och det kommer i frekommande fall att bidra till lagstiftningen.
The Commission considers that the appropriate legal provisions guaranteeing fair and timely compensation are in place to encourage early notification of suspicions and that Member States are bound and economically motivated to enforce the restrictions necessary to contain and eradicate the disease. (b) 
Kommissionen anser att rdande rttsliga bestmmelser fr rttvis kompensation utan drjsml uppmuntrar till tidig anmlan av misstnkta fall och att medlemsstaterna r skyldiga och ekonomiskt motiverade att genomdriva de restriktioner som krvs fr att bekmpa och utrota sjukdomen. b)
18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 67/1 I (Information) COURT OF AUDITORS SPECIAL REPORT No 9/2004 on Forestry Measures within Rural Development Policy, together with the CommissionŐs replies (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 248(4) of the EC Treaty) (2005/C 67/01) CONTENTS SUMMARY ................................................................ 
18.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 67/1 I (Meddelanden) REVISIONSRTTEN SRSKILD RAPPORT nr 9/2004 om skogsbrukstgrder inom politiken fr landsbygdens utveckling samt kommissionens svar (i enlighet med artikel 248.4 andra stycket i EG-frdraget) (2005/C 67/01) INNEHLLSF RTECKNING SAMMANFATTNING ........................................................
EUfinancialsupporttoforests ............................................. 
INLEDNING ...............................................................
THEEUSTRATEGYANDITSIMPLEMENTATION ................................. 
EU:sekonomiskastdtillskogen ...........................................
Sustainabilityandhowtoimplementit ...................................... 
Rttsligaramar .........................................................
MemberStatesdefineÔforestŐdifferently ...................................... 
Kommissionens information om medlemsstaternas skogsbrukstgrder r fortfarande ofullstndig ............................................................
The shared management for implementing the forest strategy is not clear . . . . . . . . . . . 
Svrigheterfransvarigamyndigheterochstdmottagare ........................
NATIONAL FOREST PROGRAMMES (NFP) OR EQUIVALENT INSTRUMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . 
SKOGSBRUKSTGRDERNASGENOMF RANDE ................................
ACOMPLEXSYSTEM........................................................ Creatingdifficultiesformanagingauthoritiesandbeneficiaries .................... 
Beskogningavjordbruksmark ............................................. Merskogsmarksomuppfyllermiljkraven................................
Administrative implementation (Unclear project selection criteria) ............. Uncertainverificationofpreviouslanduse................... ............. Calculationofcompensationforlossofincome............... ............. 
Berkningaversttningfrinkomstbortfall ............................... Ickeverifierbarakriterierfrklassificeringsomlantbrukare ................... Bristeridenationellamyndigheternaskontrollerpplats .................... vrigaskogsbrukstgrder ................................................
Weakon-the-spotchecksbythenationalauthority ......................... 
18 BILAGA2ĐMedlemsstaternasdefinitionavskog..............................................
Otherforestrymeasures .................................................. 
19 Kommissionenssvar...................................................................
C 67/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 18.3.2005 Paragraph Page 59-61 14 62-63 14 64 14 65-76 14 65-69 14 70-74 15 75 51 76 16 77-78 16 79-87 16 ........... 18 ANNEXIIŃForestdefinitionintheMemberStates ........................................... 
Beskogningen av jordbruksmark r mycket dyr, framfr allt p grund av ersttningen fr inkomstbortfallveren20-rsperiod(ekonomi) ............................... Graden av beskogning r inte srskilt betydande (ndamlsenlighet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Resultatenskullekunnanspbttrestt(effektivitet)...........................
19 TheCommissionŐsreplies .............................................................. 
Mycketvarierandeinverkan ............................................... VRIGASKOGSBRUKSTGRDERSINVERKAN..................................
Degreeofafforestationisnotverysignificant(Effectiveness) ...................... 
SLUTSATSOCHREKOMMENDATIONER ........................................
18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union GLOSSARY OF TERMS Afforestation of agricultural land: where new forests and woodland are created from agricultural land (this afforestation policy was originally dealt with under 1992 common agricultural policy (CAP) reform as part of a set of policies to take farmland out of food production). 
18.3.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning ORDLISTA Beskogning av jordbruksmark: omvandling av jordbruksmark till skog och skogsmark (dessa politiska tgrder fr beskogning togs fr frsta gngen upp i 1992 rs reform av den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken (GJP) som en del i ett politiskt tgrdspaket fr att minska andelen odlad mark avsedd fr livsmedelsproduktion).
Forestry plans: national or subnational forest programmes (or equivalent instruments) are the basis for forestry support in the EU (1). 
Skogsbruksplaner: program (eller likvrdiga instrument) p nationell eller lokal niv som ligger till grund fr EU:s skogsbruksstd (1).
They are tools for planning, implementing and monitoring forestry and forest-related activities and provide an environment for the concerted and coordinated implementation of programmes and activities by all interested parties on the basis of mutually agreed objectives and strategies (2). 
De r ett hjlpmedel vid planering, genomfrande och kontroll av skogsbruk och verksamhet som rr skogen och utgr en plattform fr alla berrda parters gemensamma och samordnade genomfrande av program och verksamhet p grundval av msesidigt avtalade ml och strategier (2).
Forestry structures measures: measures which address the development of forests and forestry, the protection of forests against atmospheric pollution and fires and forestry research. 
Strukturella skogsbrukstgrder: tgrder inriktade p utvecklingen av skog och skogsbruk, skydd av skog mot luftfroreningar och brnder samt forskning kring skogsbruk.
Wooded land/woodland area: the UN/FAO final report on Global Forest Resources Assessment, issued in 1995, defined for developed countries as land which has some forestry characteristics but is not forest. 
Trdbevuxen mark/skogsmark: enligt FN:s livsmedels-och jordbruksorganisations slutrapport om den globala skogsinventeringen (Global Forest Resources Assessment) frn 1995 r definitionen fr industrilnder ett omrde som har vissa skogliknande knnetecken men som inte r en skog.
It includes woody elements more than 50 cm and less than 7 m in height, covering more than about 20 % of the area. 
Det inbegriper trd som r hgre n 50 centimeter och lgre n 7 meter och som tcker mer n cirka 20 % av omrdet.
C 67/3 (1) Article 29 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 (OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 
C 67/3 (1) Artikel 29 i rdets frordning (EG) nr 1257/1999 av den 17 maj 1999 (EGT L 160, 26.6.1999, s.
C 67/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union SUMMARY I. Forests and woodlands cover 136 million ha (36 %) of the land area of the European Union of 15 Member States. 
C 67/4 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning SAMMANFATTNING I. I Europeiska unionens femton medlemsstater finns 136 miljoner hektar skog och skogsmark (36 % av landytan).
Forestry and forest-based industries provide employment for 2,6 million people. 
Skogsbruket och skogsindustrin sysselstter 2,6 miljoner mnniskor.
Forests and woodlands have important environmental benefits such as the preservation of fauna and flora and protection against desertification. II. 
Skog och skogsmark r till stor nytta fr miljn, exempelvis nr det gller att bevara fauna och flora och skydda mot kenspridning.
Although the Treaties have little to say about forestry, EU support for forestry has existed since 1964. In 1998 the Council adopted an EU forestry strategy (1) based on two key principles: (a) forest management should be sustainable (2), (b) forests have a multifunctional (ecological, economic and social) role. 
II. ven om frdragen inte nmner skogsbruk i ngon strre utstrckning har EU gett std till skogsbruket sedan 1964. r 1998 antog rdet en EU-strategi fr skogsbruket (1) som bygger p tv huvudprinciper, nmligen a) skogssktseln mste vara hllbar (2) och b) skogen har mnga (ekologiska, ekonomiska och sociala) funktioner.
Planned EU spending on forestry for the period 2000 to 2006 is 4,7 billion euro, half for afforestation of agricultural land and half for other forestry measures. 
EU:s utgifter p skogsbruksomrdet berknas uppg till 4,7 miljarder euro under ren 2000Đ2006, varav hlften gr till beskogning av jordbruksmark och hlften till vriga skogsbrukstgrder.
The CourtŐs audit determined whether the forestry measures were based on forestry plans or equivalent instruments; how such measures were programmed and financed; how they were implemented and what their impact was. 
I sin granskning faststllde revisionsrtten om skogsbrukstgrderna utgick frn skogsbruksplaner eller likvrdiga instrument, hur dessa tgrder planlades och finansierades samt hur de genomfrdes och vilken inverkan de fick.
Audit visits were carried out at the Commission and in the main recipient Member States (Spain, Portugal, Italy, Ireland and France). 
Granskningsbesk gjordes vid kommissionen och i de viktigaste stdmottagande medlemsstaterna (Spanien, Portugal, Italien, Irland och Frankrike).
A sample of projects, selected on the basis of their financial importance and representativeness, were visited on the spot. 
Ett urval projekt som valts ut p grund av sin ekonomiska betydelse och representativitet besktes p plats.
V. The EU forestry strategy assumes that the objectives of forestry policy (mainly economic, environmental and social) are complementary: in reality they are often contradictory. 
V. I EU:s skogsbruksstrategi frutstts det att mlen fr skogsbrukspolitiken (framfr allt p det ekonomiska, miljmssiga och sociala omrdet) kompletterar varandra: i sjlva verket r de ofta motstridiga.
In the absence of a commonly applied definition of ÔforestŐ, the extent to which the objective is achieved is difficult to monitor (see paragraphs 15 to 18). 
Eftersom det saknas en allmnt vedertagen definition av ÓskogÓ, r det svrt att kontrollera i vilken utstrckning mlen uppfylls (se punkterna 15Đ18).
Management of the EU forestry strategy is shared between the Commission and the Member States. 
Ansvaret fr EU:s skogsbruksstrategi r frdelat mellan kommissionen och medlemsstaterna.