natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Institution-building at regional level was hindered by the delays in some countries in setting up the regional bodies concerned and changes in the role foreseen for regional bodies in managing the Structural Funds (see paragraphs 60 to 62). 
Institutionsuppbyggnaden p regional niv frsvrades av frseningar i vissa lnder nr det gllde inrttandet av de avsedda regionala organen och frndringar i de roller som regionala organ frvntades ha i frvaltandet av strukturfonderna (se punkterna 60Đ62).
Overall conclusion VI. While the Commission should be commended for starting as early as 1998 to use the Phare programme to help prepare Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds, at the time of the accession the Phare programme had had a more limited impact on preparing the Candidate Countries for the ERDF and ESF than planned in the CommissionŐs policy documents, notably its Phare Review 2000 (see paragraph 67). 
Allmn slutsats VI. ven om kommissionen br f berm fr att man startade s tidigt som 1998 med att anvnda Phare-programmet fr att hjlpa till att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna, hade Phare-programmet vid tiden fr anslutningen haft en mer begrnsad inverkan nr det gller att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr ERUF och ESF n vad kommissionen hade planerat i policydokumenten, srskilt i Phare-versynen 2000 (se punkt 67).
This was in part due to the inexperience and the insufficient institutional development of the relevant authorities in the Candidate Countries. 
Detta berodde delvis p att de behriga myndigheterna i kandidatlnderna var oerfarna och inte tillrckligt utvecklade som institutioner.
It was not possible to remedy these shortcomings in the time available. 
Det gick inte att tgrda dessa brister under den tid man hade till sitt frfogande.
Recommendations VII. 
Rekommendationer VII.
There is a significant need for more institution-building support in the areas of managing the Structural Funds after the accession (see paragraph 68). 
Det finns ett stort behov av ytterligare std till institutionsuppbyggnad nr det gller frvaltningen av strukturfonderna efter anslutningen (se punkt 68).
Considerable resources should be devoted to the ex-post control of Structural Fund operations in the new Member States (see paragraph 69). 
Betydande resurser br ansls till efterhandskontroller av strukturfondsverksamhet i de nya medlemsstaterna (se punkt 69).
A clear strategy should be put in place identifying the different steps that still need to be taken for preparing the current and future Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds (see paragraph 70). 
En tydlig strategi br infras dr man identifierar de olika tgrder som nnu behver vidtas fr att frbereda de nuvarande och framtida kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna (se punkt 70).
The Commission should increase its efforts to bring Phare closer to the Structural Funds by giving future managing authorities the status of Phare implementing agencies, providing the assistance necessary to implementing agencies to enable them to implement Phare in the framework of an ex-post control system and introducing multiannual planning based on National Development Plans (see paragraph 71). 
Kommissionen br ka sina anstrngningar att gra Phare mer likt strukturfonderna genom att ge framtida frvaltningsmyndigheter status som genomfrandeorgan fr Phare, ge ndvndigt std till genomfrandeorganen fr att de skall kunna genomfra Phare i ett system med efterhandskontroller, samt infra flerrig planering grundad p nationella utvecklingsplaner (se punkt 71).
Approximately two thirds of Structural Funds are allocated to this objective. Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF) and the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF Ń Guidance Section) (3). 
C 15/5 INLEDNING Phare-std frvaltningen av strukturfonderna kandidatlnderna fr till std frn de tre viktigaste strukturfonderna: Europeiska regionala utvecklingsfonden (ERUF), Europeiska socialfonden (ESF) och Europeiska utvecklings-och garantifonden fr jordbruket (EUGFJ Đ utvecklingssektionen) (3).
In addition, all the countries concerned will be eligible for the Cohesion Fund (4). 
Dessutom kommer alla de berrda lnderna att vara berttigade till std frn sammanhllningsfonden (4).
For the period 2004 to 2006 approximately 13 178 million euro has been allocated to Objective 1 support under the Structural Funds to these countries as well as a further 7 523 million euro for the Cohesion Fund. 
Under perioden 2004Đ2006 tilldelades omkring 13 178 miljoner euro som ml 1-std inom strukturfonderna till dessa lnder, samt ytterligare 7 523 miljoner euro fr sammanhllningsfonden.
However, in order to properly (3) The principal objective of the ERDF is to promote economic and social cohesion within the European Union through the reduction of imbalances between regions or social groups. 
Fr att de nya medlemsstaterna skall dra nytta av (3) Det frmsta mlet fr ERUF r att verka fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning inom Europeiska unionen genom att minska obalanser mellan regioner och samhllsgrupper.
The ESF is the main financial instrument allowing the Union to realise the strategic objectives of its employment policy. 
ESF r unionens viktigaste finansiella instrument nr det gller att frverkliga de strategiska mlen fr unionens sysselsttningspolitik.
The EAGGF is designed to contribute to the structural reform of the agriculture sector and to the development of rural areas. 
EUGFJ har utformats fr att bidra till den strukturella reformen av jordbrukssektorn och fr utveckling av landsbygdsomrden.
For the Structural Fund programming period 1994 to 1999, 52 % of funds were implemented through the ERDF, 30 % through the ESF and 16 % through the EAGGF. The remaining 2 % were implemented through the fourth Structural Fund, the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG). 
Fr strukturfondernas programplaneringsperiod 1994Đ1999 genomfrdes 52 % av medlen genom ERUF, 30 % genom ESF och 16 % genom EUGFJ. terstende 2 % genomfrdes genom den fjrde strukturfonden, Fonden fr fiskets utveckling (FFU).
(4) The Cohesion Fund finances environment and transport infrastructure projects in countries whose GNP per capita is below 90 % of the EU average (current recipients are Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal). 
(4) Sammanhllningsfonden finansierar projekt inom milj och transportinfrastruktur i lnder vars BNP per capita r lgre n 90 % av genomsnittet i EU (fr nrvarande r Grekland, Spanien, Irland och Portugal mottagare). fr att frbereda 1.
C 15/6 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.1.2005 benefit from this funding, new Member States must be able to identify, prepare and implement priority programmes and projects within the timeframes laid down. 
C 15/6 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.1.2005 dessa bidrag p rtt stt mste de dock kunna identifiera, frbereda och genomfra prioriterade program och projekt inom de faststllda tidsramarna.
In March 1997 the Commission proposed a reorientation of the Phare programme in order to fully focus it on preparing Candidate Countries for joining the European Union(5)(6). 
I mars 1997 freslog kommissionen att Phare-programmet skulle omorienteras s att det helt skulle kunna inriktas p att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr intrdet i europeiska unionen (5) (6).
Henceforth the Phare budget (approximately 1 500 million per annum) was to be allocated in principle to institution-building (30 %) and investment support (70 %). 
Drefter skulle Phare-budgeten (omkring 1 500 miljoner euro per r) anvndas i princip till institutionsuppbyggnad (30 %) och investeringsstd (70 %).
As far as institution-building was concerned, among the specific areas which the Commission called for funding to be focused on was regional development. 
Ett av de srskilda omrden som kommissionen begrde att medlen till institutionsuppbyggnad skulle inriktas p var regional utveckling.
Thus it stated that Ôthere is a need for the introduction, as soon as possible, to the objectives and procedures of the Structural Funds. 
Kommissionen faststllde allts att kandidatlnderna s snart som mjligt behvde bli frtrogna med ml och frfaranden fr strukturfonderna.
This is the best way to ensure these countries will be capable, in due course, of applying the rules of the Structural Funds and handling the first payments from themŐ (7). 
Det skulle vara det bsta sttet att garantera att dessa lnder har frmga att, nr den tiden kommer, tillmpa reglerna fr strukturfonden och hantera de frsta utbetalningarna frn dem (7).
Accordingly a ÔSpecial Preparatory Programme for the preparation of the Candidate Countries for EU Structural PolicyŐ (SPP) covering each Candidate Country was financed from the 1998 Phare programme for a total of 60 million. 
Ett Ósrskilt frberedande program fr att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr EU:s strukturpolitikÓ omfattande samtliga kandidatlnder finansierades frn 1998 rs Phare-program med totalt 60 miljoner euro.
The programme funded institution-building and small pilot investment projects of the type financed from the Structural Funds to begin to give Candidate Countries operational experience in Objective 1 procedures. 
Genom programmet finansierades institutionsuppbyggnad och sm investeringar i pilotprojekt av det slag som finansieras av strukturfonderna fr att ge kandidatlnder inledande praktisk erfarenhet av ml 1-frfaranden.
The urgency of preparing Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds was highlighted by the Berlin Financial Framework of March 1999 which provided for the possibility of six new countries (Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia together with Cyprus) joining the European Union as early as 2002 (8). 
Att man skyndsamt mste frbereda kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna var ngot som lyftes fram i de ekonomiska ramar som beslutades i Berlin i mars 1999 och som gav sex av de nya lnderna (Tjeckien, Estland, Cypern, Ungern, Polen samt Slovenien) mjlighet att g med i Europeiska unionen redan 2002 (8).
(5) The new orientation agreed was set out in a Communication to the Commission from Commissioner van den Broek: New Orientations for the Phare Programme in the Context of Pre-Accession Assistance (COM(97) 112/8, Brussels, 18 March 1997). 
(5) Den nya inriktning som beslutades lades fram i ett meddelande till kommissionen frn kommissionr van den Broek: New Orientations for the PHARE Programme in the Context of Pre-Accession Assistance (KOM(97) 112/8, Bryssel, 18 mars 1997).
(6) As well as the countries referred to in footnote 1, which will join the European Union in May 2004, the Phare programme also provides assistance to Bulgaria and Romania which are foreseen to join the European Union at a later date. 
(6) Frutom de lnder som nmns i fotnot 1 och som kommer att bli medlemmar i EU i maj 2004 ger Phare-programmet ocks std till Bulgarien och Rumnien som planeras ansluta sig till Europeiska unionen vid ett senare datum.
(7) COM(97) 112/8, Brussels, 18 March 1997. 
(7) KOM(97) 112/8, Bryssel, 18 mars 1997.
(8) The Helsinki Summit of the European Council in December 1999 opened the possibility of accession to a further six countries (Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Romania and Slovakia). 
(8) Europeiska rdets toppmte i Helsingfors i december 1999 ppnade mjligheter fr ytterligare sex lnder att ansluta sig (Bulgarien, Lettland, Litauen, Malta, Rumnien och Slovakien).
Subsequently the Nice European Council in December 2000 established 2004 as the target date for accession. 
Drefter beslutade Europeiska rdet i Nice i december 2000 att stta 2004 som mldatum fr anslutningen.
The Laeken European Council of December 2001 declared that accession was irreversible and that these 10 countries should be ready in 2004. 
Europeiska rdet i Laeken i december 2001 frklarade att anslutningen var oterkallelig och att dessa tio stater skulle vara klara fr anslutning 2004.
In 2000 two new pre-accession instruments were created. 
Under 2000 skapades tv nya franslutningsinstrument.
ISPA (9) (annual budget: 1 000 million) had similar objectives and procedures to the Cohesion FundŐ. 
Ispa (9) (rlig budget: 1 000 miljoner euro) hade liknande mlsttningar och frfaranden som sammanhllningsfonden.
Sapard (10) (annual budget: 500 million) aimed at contributing to the implementation of the acquis communautaire in the common agricultural policy and at solving priority and specific problems for the sustainable adaptation of the agricultural sector and rural areas, and, in line with the Sapard Regulation, was implemented with some similarities to the Structural Funds and the EAGGF (see paragraph 17). Although the ERDF and ESF were respectively around three times and two times bigger than the EAGGF Structural Fund (11), no new instruments were established in relation to these two Structural Funds. 
Sapard (10) (rlig budget: 500 miljoner euro) skulle bidra till att gemenskapens regelverk tillmpas inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken och lsa prioritetsproblem och srskilda problem med en hllbar anpassning av jordbrukssektorn och landsbygdsomrden, och genomfrandet hade, i enlighet med frordningen om Sapard, vissa likheter med strukturfonderna och EUGFJ (se punkt 17). ven om ERUF och ESF var omkring tre respektive tv gnger strre n strukturfonden EUGFJ (11), inrttades inga nya instrument fr dessa tv strukturfonder.
Instead, the new Phare Guidelines for 2000 to 2006 provided for the setting up in each country of Economic and Social Cohesion (ESC) investment programmes to be funded from Phare (12). 
I stllet freskrev de nya riktlinjerna fr Phare 2000Đ2006 att det i varje land skall upprttas investeringsprogram fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning som skall finansieras genom Phare (12).
The ESC programmes would be implemented through measures similar to those financed by these two Structural Funds, in the areas of productive sector investment, human resource development and business related infrastructure. 
Programmen fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning skall genomfras genom tgrder liknande dem som finansieras av dessa tv strukturfonder, inom omrdena investering i produktionssektorn, utveckling av mnskliga resurser och affrs-relaterad infrastruktur.
These programmes would be one of the two areas to be funded from the 70 % of Phare funds allocated to investment (13). 
Dessa program skall vara ett av de tv omrden som skall finansieras genom de 70 % av Phare-medlen som tilldelas investeringar (13).
The guidelines also stated that Phare institution-building activities (the remaining 30 % of Phare funds) would particularly reflect the importance of these ESC programmes by addressing weaknesses of the administrations at central, regional and local level which had responsibilities in this area (14). 8. 
I riktlinjerna faststlldes ocks att institutionsuppbyggnadsaktiviteter inom Phare (resterande 30 % av Phare-medlen) i synnerhet skall spegla betydelsen av dessa program fr ekonomisk och social sammanhllning genom att vara inriktade p svagheter i de centrala, regionala och lokala administrationer som var ansvariga fr detta omrde (14).
Further to these guidelines, a Commission review of the Phare programme was issued in October 2000 entitled ÔPhare 2000 Review: Strengthening preparations for membershipŐ (15). 
8. beropande dessa riktlinjer gjorde kommissionen en versyn av Phare-programmet i oktober 2000 med titeln ÓPhare 2000 Review: Strengthening Preparations for MembershipÓ (15).
The Review concluded that what it termed ÔMoving to Structural (9) Council Regulation (EC) No 1267/1999 of 21 June 1999 establishing an Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 
I versynen drogs slutsatsen att vad man kallade Óvergngen till strukturfondernaÓ var en av de tv utmaningarna fr Phare som (9) Rdets frordning (EG) nr 1267/1999 av den 21 juni 1999 om upprttande av ett strukturpolitiskt franslutningsinstrument (EGT L 161, 26.6.1999, s.
(10) Council Regulation (EC) No 1268/1999 of 21 June 1999 on Community support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development in the applicant countries of central and eastern Europe in the pre-accession period (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p. 
(10) Rdets frordning (EG) nr 1268/1999 av den 21 juni 1999 om gemenskapsstd fr franslutningstgrder fr jordbruket och landsbygdens utveckling i kandidatlnderna i Central-och steuropa under franslutningsperioden (EGT L 161, 26.6.1999, s.
(11) Based on Structural Fund assistance 1994 to 1999: ERDF 75,0 billion; ESF 43,4 billion; EAGGF 23,5 billion. 
(11) Baserat p strukturfondsstd 1994Đ1999: ERUF 75,0 miljarder euro; ESF 43,4 miljarder euro; EUGFJ 23,5 miljarder euro.
(12) ÔGuidelines for Phare Programme Implementation in Candidate Countries for the Period 2000 to 2006 in Application of Article 8 of Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89Ő. 
(12) ÓRiktlinjer fr genomfrandet av Phare-programmet i kandidatlnderna under 2000Đ2006 i enlighet med artikel 8 i frordning (EEG) nr 3906/89Ó.
Commission Decision: SEC(1999) 1596 final, Brussels, 13 October 1999. 
Kommissionens beslut SEK(1999) 1596 slutlig, Bryssel, 13 oktober 1999.
(13) The second area to be funded under investment was ÔAlignment with EU norms and standardsŐ which primarily involved the provision of equipment to key institutions for the monitoring and enforcing of the acquis. 
(13) Det andra omrdet som skall finansieras under investeringar r Óanpassning till EU-normer och standarderÓ vilket frmst gller att ge utrustning till viktiga institutioner fr att de skall kunna vervaka och strka regelverket.
(14) See Section 3 ÔInstitution-buildingŐ of the 2000 to 2006 guidelines. 
(14) Se avsnitt 3 ÓInstitutionsuppbyggnadÓ i riktlinjerna fr 2000Đ2006.
(15) Directorate-General Enlargement, C(2000) 3103/2, 27 October 2000. 
(15) Generaldirektoratet fr utvidgning, C(2000) 3103/2, 27 oktober 2000.
20.1.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 15/7 FundsŐ was one of two challenges for Phare that the Commission must tackle over the period 2000 to 2006. 
20.1.2005 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 15/7 kommissionen mste hantera under perioden 2000Đ2006.
The objective of the CourtŐs audit was to assess how effective the Phare programme was in preparing Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds. 
Mlet fr revisionsrttens granskning var att bedma hur ndamlsenligt Phare-programmet var nr det gller att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna.
To do this the Court: (a) examined the extent to which the overall approach followed by the Commission provided an effective basis for preparing the Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds (see paragraphs 15 to 28); (b) examined how far Phare provided adequate preparation for Structural Fund structures and procedures (see paragraphs 29 to 36); (c) examined whether Phare funding was allocated as foreseen to this purpose and to what extent this funding was being efficiently implemented (see paragraphs 37 to 55); (d) examined the effectiveness of institution-building projects in meeting their objective of preparing beneficiary countries for managing the Structural Funds (see paragraphs 56 to 62). 
Fr att gra detta har revisionsrtten a) underskt i vilken omfattning kommissionens vergripande strategi var en ndamlsenlig grund fr att frbereda kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna (se punkterna 15Đ28), b) underskt hur vl Phare-programmet lmpade sig fr frberedelse fr strukturfondernas struktur och frfaranden (se punkterna 29Đ36), c) underskt om Phare-medel tilldelades s som avsetts fr detta ndaml och hur effektivt dessa medel utnyttjades (se punkterna 37Đ55), d) underskt hur ndamlsenliga institutionsuppbyggnadsprojekten var nr det gller att n mlet att frbereda mottagarlnder fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna (se punkterna 56Đ62).
The Court selected this audit in view of the increasing importance attached by the Commission since 1997 to preparing Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds, and the significant resources expected to be allocated from the Phare programme to meeting this objective from 2000 onwards in relation to the ERDF and ESF (16). 
Revisionsrtten valde denna granskning med anledning av att kommissionen sedan 1997 har gett frberedandet av kandidatlnderna fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna allt strre betydelse, och med anledning av de omfattande resurser som frvntas delas ut genom Phare-programmet frn 2000 och framver fr att n detta ml nr det gller ERUF och ESF (16).
It also did not undertake an assessment of the capacity of the Candidate Countries to manage the Structural Funds because this is the responsibility of the Commission itself which it carries out through its annual reports on the overall preparedness of Candidate Countries for the accession (17). 
Det gjordes heller ingen bedmning av kandidatlndernas frmga att frvalta strukturfonderna eftersom detta r kommissionens eget ansvar som den fullgr genom sina rliga rapporter om kandidatlndernas allmnna frberedelse fr anslutningen (17).
The CourtŐs audit rather examines the Phare programme to assess how well the funding available under it was used to assist Candidate Countries to prepare for managing the Structural Funds. 
Revisionsrtten granskade snarare Phare-programmet fr att bedma hur vl de tillgngliga medlen i programmet anvndes fr att hjlpa kandidatlnderna att frbereda sig fr frvaltningen av strukturfonderna.
(16) The Court is carrying out a separate audit on the management of the Sapard pre-accession instrument which is linked to the third main Structural Fund, the EAGGF. 
(16) Revisionsrtten genomfr en srskild granskning av frvaltningen av franslutningsinstrumentet Sapard som r kopplat till den tredje viktigaste strukturfonden, EUGFJ.
In addition, the Court examined aspects of the management of ISPA in its Special Report No 5/2003 ÔPhare and ISPA funding of environmental projects in Candidate CountriesŐ, OJ C 167, 17.7.2003 (17) From 1998 to 2003 the Commission issued annually ÔRegular ReportsŐ on Candidate CountriesŐ level of preparedness for EU membership. 
Dessutom granskade revisionsrtten aspekter av frvaltningen av Ispa i sin srskilda rapport nr 5/2003 om finansiering av miljprojekt i kandidatlnderna genom Phare och Ispa (EUT C 167, 17.7.2003). (17) Frn 1998 till 2003 gav kommissionen rligen ut terkommande rapporter (Regular Reports) om hur frberedda kandidatlnderna var fr EU-medlemskapet.
Following completion of the accession negotiations at the end of 2002 with eight of the ten Candidate Countries from central and eastern Europe, the Commission published in November 2003 a ÔComprehensive Monitoring ReportŐ on the extent to which they had taken further steps in preparation for membership. 
Efter att anslutningsfrhandlingarna med tta av de tio kandidatlnderna frn Centraleuropa och steuropa hade avslutats i slutet av 2002, offentliggjorde kommissionen i november 2003 en Óheltckande vervakningsrapportÓ om hur lngt de hade kommit i frberedelserna fr medlemskapet. a) b) Att frbereda fr genomfrandet av strukturfonderna i kandidatlnderna genom inrttandet av ndvndiga administrativa strukturer och budgetstrukturer.
C 15/8 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.1.2005 programmes are set out in Table 1 (18). 
C 15/8 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.1.2005 13.
On-the-spot missions to seven Candidate Countries (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania and Slovakia) were carried out in 2002. 
2002 genomfrdes besk p plats i sju kandidatlnder (Bulgarien, Lettland, Polen, Rumnien, Slovakien, Tjeckien, Ungern).
In addition, the Supreme Audit Institutions of Lithuania and Slovenia audited this subject in their countries in cooperation with the Court and using its methodology. 
Dessutom gjordes granskningar av detta omrde i Litauen och Slovenien av de hgre nationella revisionsorganen i samarbete med revisionsrtten och med revisionsrttens metodik.