natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(7) Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the economic accounts for agriculture in the Community, Brussels, 4 February 2003, COM(2003) 50 final. 
(7) Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, frslag till Europaparlamentets och rdets frordning om rkenskaper fr jordbruket i gemenskapen, Bryssel, 4 februari 2003, KOM(2003) 50 slutlig.
108; Manual on the Economic Accounts for Agriculture and Forestry EAA/EAF (Rev. 1.1), No 4.12. 
108; Manual on the Economic Accounts for Agriculture and Forestry EAA/EAF (Rev. 1.1), nr 4.12.
Eurostat publishes a first estimate towards the end of the financial year concerned. 
Eurostat offentliggr en frsta uppskattning i slutet av det aktuella budgetret.
It publishes a second estimate in the spring of the subsequent financial year and then presents final figures in the summer. 
Eurostat offentliggr en andra uppskattning under vren fljande budgetr, och presenterar sedan de definitiva siffrorna under sommaren.
Observations 34. 
Iakttagelser 34.
Two headings in the EAA 2000 were examined in the Member States audited in order to verify the exactness of the data Ń cereal production and Ôintermediate consumptionŐ. 
Fr att kontrollera att uppgifterna r exakta har tv poster i EAA 2000 granskats i de underskta medlemsstaterna, nmligen spannmlsproduktionen och insatsfrbrukningen.
In the case of the first heading, the statistics available are generally of reasonably good quality. 
Vad gller den frsta av dessa poster r den tillgngliga statistiken allmnt av ganska god kvalitet.
The auditors retraced the various stages of the calculation of these two aggregates and checked the source of all the underlying data used. 
Revisorerna har rekonstruerat de olika etapperna i berkningen av dessa bda aggregat och har bekrftat alla anvnda grunduppgifters ursprung.
Nevertheless, they noted that the quality of the statistics varied considerably in the Member States visited. 
De gjorde dock iakttagelsen att kvaliteten p statistiken varierade kraftigt mellan de beskta medlemsstaterna.
Whereas, almost all Member States visited had statistical data on production, either based on statutory provisions or collected voluntarily, in the case of Ôintermediate consumptionŐ there were only estimates based on hypotheses, which varied from Member State to Member State. 
Nstan alla medlemsstater har statistiska uppgifter om produktion, baserade antingen p en rttslig grund eller p frivilligt insamlande, men fr insatsfrbrukningen finns endast uppskattningar grundade p kriterier och hypoteser som skiljer sig t mellan medlemsstaterna.
On the one hand, it has launched an initiative to draw up an inventory of the EAA, in which each Member State specifies the sources of its data and the methods it used to calculate the values forwarded to Eurostat. On the other hand, it has begun drawing up standard reports by country and financial year. Plausibility checks are carried out when these reports are produced and Ń where there are inconsistencies Ń the Member States are asked to provide explanations. 
Vad gller utvecklingen av tillfrlitligheten hos olika siffror frsker Eurostat verbrygga de svrigheter som nmns ovan p tv stt: dels har Eurostat tagit initiativet till att upprtta en inventariefrteckning ver rkenskaperna fr jordbruket dr varje medlemsstat preciserar var uppgifterna kommer ifrn och vilka metoder som medlemsstaten har anvnt fr att berkna de vrden som har meddelats till Eurostat, dels har Eurostat brjat upprtta typrapporter per land och per rkenskapsr. Inom ramen fr dessa rapporter grs tester av samstmmigheten och om fel upptcks krver man klargranden frn medlemsstaterna.
Nevertheless, all the opportunities for cross-checking with data from other sources have not been exhausted and the end-user of the EAA has no indicator which would allow him to assess the statistical accuracy of the data. 
Mjligheterna till dubbelkontroll mellan de olika uppgiftskllorna anvnds dock lngt ifrn fullt ut, och den slutliga anvndaren av EAA har ingen indikator som gr det mjligt att bedma hur statistiskt exakta uppgifterna r.
Income of the Agricultural Households Sector (IAHS) Legal basis and concept 37. In 1985, the Commission published a study of the prospects for the agricultural sector. 
Inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn Rttslig grund och begrepp 37. r 1985 offentliggjorde kommissionen en studie om den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
In this study it estimated the number of farmers who would require direct income support because their income was insufficient, and the relevant costs for the Community budget (1). 
I studien gjordes en uppskattning av antalet jordbrukare vars ln var otillrcklig och som skulle behva direkt inkomststd, samt vilka kostnader detta skulle medfra fr gemenskapsbudgeten (1).
The discussion provoked by the CommissionŐs Green Paper of 1985 showed that it lacked information on the total income of agricultural households. 
Den debatt som vcktes genom denna kommissionens grnbok 1985 visade att kommissionen saknade information om jordbrukshushllens totala inkomster.
This is why Eurostat launched the ÔTotal income of agricultural householdsŐ project. In 1997, the statistics relating to the total income of agricultural households were renamed statistics on the ÔIncome of the (1) Commission of the European Communities, COM(85) 333 final, p. 
Drfr pbrjade Eurostat ett projekt som kallades Ójordbru-karhushllens totalinkomstÓ. r 1997 ndrades namnet p statistiken ver jordbrukshushllens totala inkomster till statistik (1) Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, KOM(85) 333 slutlig, s.
56 ff. C 45/10 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 Agricultural Households SectorŐ (IAHS) in order to give a more precise description of their contents and distinguish them more clearly from other statistics. 
56 f. C 45/10 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 ver Óinkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektornÓ, vilket tydligare speglar vad statistiken gller och gr det lttare att skilja den frn annan statistik.
The aim of the statistics drawn up in accordance with the method based on the Agricultural Households Sector (IAHS) is to provide an instrument for measuring total income in order to: (a) study changes, year-on-year, in the aggregate income of agricultural households in the Member States; (b) track changes in the composition of this income, in particular in the percentage of this income that comes from agricultural holdings, other paid employment, property and social benefits; (c) compare changes in the total income of agricultural households with those in the income of other socioeconomic groups by household, member of the household, and consumption unit; (d) compare total farmersŐ income per unit with that of other socioeconomic groups (1). 
Med den statistik som frts enligt metoden som grundas p jordbrukshushllssektorn vill man f fram ett mtinstrument fr den totala inkomsten fr att kunna: a) studera utvecklingen frn r till r av de totala inkomsterna fr jordbrukshushllen sammantaget i medlemsstaterna, b) flja utvecklingen av inkomsternas sammansttning, i synnerhet den del av inkomsten som genereras av jordbruksfretaget, andra avlnade verksamheter, egendomar och sam-hllsstd, c) jmfra utvecklingen av den totala inkomsten fr jordbrukshushllen per hushll, per medlem av hushllet och per kon-sumtionsenhet med utvecklingen av andra socioekonomiska gruppers inkomst, d) jmfra den totala inkomsten fr jordbrukare per enhet med andra socioekonomiska gruppers inkomster (1).
This includes, in addition to income from paid employment, rents and other transfer payments, the value of agricultural goods produced and consumed by the household and the rental value of owner-occupied dwellings. 
Den disponibla nettoinkomsten omfattar, frutom inkomsten av avlnade verksamheter, ven pensioner och andra kostnader fr verfringar, samt vrdet p jordbruksprodukter som producerats och konsumerats av hushllet, samt hyresvrdet fr hushllets bostad.
Taxes and social benefits, in particular, are deducted from the amount thus calculated. 
Skatter och sociala avgifter dras sedan av frn denna summa.
Figure 3 explains the calculation of net disposable income. 
I figur 3 frklaras hur den disponibla nettoinkomsten berknas.
(1) European Commission, Income of the Agricultural Households Sector, 1999 Report, Luxembourg, 2000, Table 1.1, p. 
(1) Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, Inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn, rapport 1999, Luxemburg, 2000, tabell 1.1, s.
Figure 3 Calculation of net disposable income within the framework of the IAHS Net operating surplus from independent activity (a) from agricultural activity (b) from non-agricultural activity (c) from imputed rental value of owner-occupied dwellings + Compensation to members of agricultural households as employees, from agricultural and non-agricultural activity + property income received + non-life insurance claims (personal and material damage) + social benefits (other than social benefits in kind) + miscellaneous inward current transfers (paid) = Total resources Đ property income paid Đ net non-life insurance premiums Đ current taxes on income and wealth Đ social contributions Đ miscellaneous outgoing transfers (paid) = Net disposable income Source: Farm Incomes, Wealth and Agricultural Policy, Berkeley Hill, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Hants 2000, 3rd edition, p. 
Figur 3 Berkning av disponibel nettoinkomst inom ramen fr projektet om inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn Fretagets nettoverskott frn sjlvstndig verksamhet a) jordbruksverksamhet b) annan verksamhet n jordbruk c) imputerade hyror fr bostder som bebos av garen + Ersttning till medlemmar av jordbrukshushllet ssom anstllda, inom jordbruksverksamhet eller annan verksamhet + Uppburna kapitalinkomster + Skadefrskringsfordringar (vid personskador eller materialskador) + Uppburna sociala frmner (frutom naturafrmner) + Diverse lpande transfereringar (mottagna) = Totalt tillgngar Đ Inkomst frn egendom Đ Skadefrskringspremier, netto Đ Lpande skatter p inkomst och frmgenhet Đ Sociala avgifter Đ Diverse lpande transfereringar (betalda) = Disponibel nettoinkomst Klla: Farm Incomes, Wealth and Agricultural Policy, Berkeley Hill, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Hants 2000, 3:e upplagan, s.
The unit of measurement covers all the persons living under the same roof. 
Mttenheten omfattar alla personer som bor under samma tak.
In order to distinguish agricultural households from other households, Eurostat has developed two definitions: in the narrow sense of the term, an agricultural household is a household where farming is the main source of income of the reference person Ń as a general rule, the head of the household. 
Fr att skilja jordbrukshushll frn andra hushll har Eurostat faststllt tv definitioner: i strikt bemrkelse r ett jordbrukshushll ett hushll dr referenspersonen Đ i allmnhet familjefrsrjaren Đ fr sin huvudsakliga inkomst frn jordbruket.
In the broad sense of the term, on the other hand, all households are considered to be agricultural households in which at least one member draws some income from an independent agricultural activity (2). 
I vid bemrkelse menas dremot med jordbrukshushll alla hushll dr minst en medlem fr en viss inkomst frn en sjlvstndig jordbruksverksamhet (2).
Observations Microeconomic and macroeconomic approaches 42. 
Iakttagelser Mikroekonomiskt eller makroekonomiskt frfarande 42.
As in the case of the EAA, the sources of data used for the IAHS in the various Member States have not been harmonised. 
I likhet med EAA r informationskllorna som anvnds i de olika medlemsstaterna fr projektet om inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn inte harmoniserade.
To enable the Member States to apply the simplest method with regard to the information at their disposal, Eurostat allows them to choose between various approaches to determine the income of the agricultural households sector: (a) the disposable income of the Ôagricultural householdsŐ sector may be obtained by the extrapolation of microeconomic data obtained from surveys of family budgets, tax records or surveys of the accounts of agricultural holdings; (2) European Commission, Income of the agricultural households sector, 1999 Report, Luxembourg, 2000, p. 103 ff. 
Fr att medlemsstaterna skall kunna tillmpa en s enkel metod som mjligt med hnsyn till de uppgifter de har, ger Eurostat dem mjlighet att vlja mellan flera frfaranden fr att berkna jordbrukshushlls-sektorns inkomster: a) (2) Den disponibla inkomsten fr jordbrukshushllssektorn kan berknas genom extrapolering av mikroekonomiska uppgifter, som finns i underskningar om familjebudgetar, i skattere-gistren eller i jordbruksfretagens rkenskaper. Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, Inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn, rapport 1999, Luxemburg, 2000, s. 103 f.
20.2.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 45/11 (b) (c) in the national accounts, the distribution of income account for the ÔhouseholdsŐ sector is subdivided into separate sub-accounts for agricultural households and other socioeconomic groups. 
20.2.2004 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 45/11 b) c) I kontot fr hushllsinkomster i de nationella rkenskaperna skiljer man mellan jordbrukshushll och andra sociala och ekonomiska grupper genom att placera dem i olika underavdelningar.
The distribution key is usually taken from a source of macroeconomic data (macroeconomic approach); a ÔhybridŐ approach, where the income from agricultural activity is calculated on a macroeconomic basis but the other components making up disposable income are taken from microeconomic sources of information (1). 
Frdelningsnyckeln r i allmnhet tagen frn en makroekonomisk uppgiftsklla (makroekonomiskt frfarande). Ett blandat frfarande innebr att inkomsterna frn jordbruksverksamheten berknas p makroekonomisk grund, medan vriga delar av inkomsten berknas p basis av mikroekonomiska informationskllor (1).
Table 1 The Netherlands: difference between incomes calculated by the microeconomic approach and incomes calculated by the macroeconomic approach 43. 
Nederlnderna: Skillnad mellan inkomster berknade enligt ett mikroekonomiskt frfarande och inkomster berknade enligt ett makroekonomiskt frfarande Tabell 1 43.
Of the six Member States visited, four had opted for the microeconomic approach. 
Av de sex medlemsstater som har beskts har fyra valt ett mikroekonomiskt frfarande.
One Member State (Netherlands) compared the income calculated by the microeconomic approach, on the basis of a survey of households, with the income determined by the macroeconomic approach based on the EAA. 
En medlemsstat (Nederlnderna) jmfrde den berknade inkomsten enligt det mikroekonomiska frfarandet, med utgngspunkt i en underskning om hushllen, med den berknade inkomsten enligt ett makroekonomiskt frfarande baserat p jordbruksrkenskaperna.
The difference found between these two values was reduced by adjustments at both the microeconomic and macroeconomic levels (defini-tional difference). 
Den skillnad som upptcktes mellan de bda vrdena minskas frst av justeringar som bde r mikroekonomiska och makroekonomiska (skillnad i definition).
The figures for the 1997 and 1998 financial years are shown in Table 1. 
Vrdena fr budgetren 1997 och 1998 visas i tabell 1.
Income panel survey (microeconomic approach) Definitional difference Statistical difference National accounts (macroeconomic approach) Source: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, The Hague (national statistics office of the Netherlands). 
1997 1998 Relativt vrde 28 % 23 % 48 % 100 % Panelunderskning om frfarande) inkomster (mikroekonomiskt Absolut vrde 4 131 Relativt vrde 36 % Absolut vrde 3 037 2 492 5 135 10 664 Skillnader i definition Statistiska skillnader Nationella rkenskaper (makroekonomiskt frfarande) Klla: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek de La Haye (Nederlndernas nationella statistikkontor).
In view of the differences in disposable income calculated for one Member State using these two approaches, 46 % and 48 % for 1997 and 1998 respectively, there must be doubts about the equivalence of the two methods. 
Eftersom en medlemsstat fann att berkningarna av den disponibla inkomsten enligt de bda olika angreppsstten skilde sig t motsvarande 46 % fr 1997 och 48 % fr 1998, kan man allts tvivla p att de bda metoderna r likvrdiga.
Difficulties in the implementation of the project 45. 
Svrigheter med att genomfra projektet 45.
With regard to the calculation of the IAHS, using (unhar-monised) microeconomic data, the Member States were repeatedly confronted with the problem of obtaining reliable data. 
Nr det gller berkning av inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn med mikroekonomiska uppgifter som inte r harmoniserade, stlls medlemsstaterna regelbundet infr problemet med att erhlla tillfrlitliga uppgifter.
For instance, one of the Member States visited extracted the data required from an annual survey of households, but the proportion of agricultural households was, in this case, so small, that this survey can no longer be considered representative. 
En av de medlemsstater som beskts hmtade sina uppgifter frn en rlig underskning bland hushllen, men jordbrukshushllen var proportionellt sett s f att underskningen inte kunde anses vara representativ.
Faced with the impossibility, for financial reasons, of expanding the sample to include further agricultural households, the Member State concerned did not forward any more data to Eurostat (Germany). 
D det inte var ekonomiskt mjligt att utvidga underskningen till att glla andra jordbrukshushll har denna medlemsstat slutat att lmna in uppgifter till Eurostat (Tyskland).
(1) European Commission, Income of the Agricultural Households Sector, 1999 Report, Luxembourg, 2000, p. 
(1) Europeiska gemenskapernas kommission, Inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn, rapport 1999, Luxemburg, 2000, s.
Some Member States experienced difficulties in collecting the data from very disparate sources which were needed to be able to record all sources of income for the various members of the household. 
Vissa medlemsstater har svrt att samla in de vitt skilda uppgifter som behvs fr att registrera alla inkomstkllor fr de olika personerna i hushllet.
In addition, in some Member States, the rules governing tax secrecy and the protection of personal data hamper the use of the data. 
Skattesekretess och skydd av personuppgifter frhindrar dessutom anvndningen av uppgifter i vissa medlemsstater.
In one Member State, the statistics office can only use income data extracted from tax returns if they remain anony-mous. 
I en medlemsstat kan statistikkontoret endast anvnda inkomstuppgifter frn skattedeklarationer om de r ano-nyma.
These data cannot, therefore, be linked with certainty to agricultural holdings (France). 
Dessa uppgifter kan allts inte med skerhet bindas till jordbruksfretag (Frankrike).
Another Member State may use tax data but, as its tax system does not make any distinction between income from agriculture or from industrial or commercial activities, a significant percentage of the households covered by this survey cannot be linked with certainty to the agricultural sector (Netherlands). 
En annan medlemsstat kan anvnda skatteuppgifter men eftersom skattesystemet inte gr ngon skillnad mellan inkomst av jordbruksverksamhet och inkomst frn industriell eller kommersiell verksamhet, kan en betydande del av de hushll som berrs av underskningen inte med skerhet knytas till jordbruket (Nederlnderna).
Yet another Member State avoids the difficulties by simply using IAHS farm data without making any allowance for methodological differences (Austria). 
En medlemsstat kringgr dessa svrigheter genom att endast anvnda uppgifterna i ISJR, som baseras p fretagen, utan att ta hnsyn till skillnaderna i metod ( sterrike).
Table 2 shows the data forwarded as at 12 October 2001. 
I tabell 2 visas en versikt ver uppgifter som lmnats in senast den 12 oktober 2001.
The length of some delays demonstrates clearly the difficulties of implementing the project. 11 410 
De i vissa fall stora frseningarna visar tydligt vilka svrigheter man har sttt p vid genomfrandet av projektet. Att ge medlemsstaterna mjlighet att vlja mellan ett
C 45/12 EN Official Journal of the European Union 20.2.2004 Table 2 Data provided for the calculation of the Income of the Agricultural Households Sector Belgium Denmark Germany Greece Spain France Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Austria Portugal Finland Sweden United Kingdom ÔNarrowŐ definition 1987-1999 1989-1999 1972-1993 1982-1998 1980-1993 1990-1995 1987 1984-1995 1989 1988-1997 1985-1999 1980-1989 1987-1999 1989-1997 1980-1998 ÔBroadŐ definition N/A 1989-1999 1983 1982, 1988, 1994 1990 N/A 1987 N/A N/A 1988 1991-1994 N/A 1992 1992 N/A Source: European Commission (Eurostat), Meeting of the ÔEconomic Accounts for AgricultureŐ Working Party of the Agricultural Statistics Committee in Luxembourg on 28 and 29 November 2001, Doc. 
C 45/12 SV Europeiska unionens officiella tidning 20.2.2004 Tabell 2 Uppgifter som lmnats fr berkning av inkomsterna fr jordbrukshushllssektorn Belgien Danmark Tyskland Grekland Spanien Frankrike Irland Italien Luxemburg Nederlnderna sterrike Portugal Finland Sverige Frenade kungariket Definition i strikt bemrkelse 1987-1999 1989-1999 1972-1993 1982-1998 1980-1993 1990-1995 1987 1984-1995 1989 1988-1997 1985-1999 1980-1989 1987-1999 1989-1997 1980-1998 Definition i vid bemrkelse inga 1989-1999 1983 1982, 1988, 1994 1990 inga 1987 inga inga 1988 1991-1994 inga 1992 1992 inga Klla: Europeiska kommissionen (Eurostat), mte i Stndiga kommittn fr Luxemburg den 28 och 29 november 2001, dok.
ASA/EEA/513, p. 
ASA/EEA/513, s.
48. difficulties affecting the collection of reliable data. 
48. staterna vilka svrigheter som frhindrar insamlingen av tillfrlitliga uppgifter.
On this occasion, four Member States stated that they were not interested in the project, five others mentioned major technical problems and six reported financial difficulties. 
Vid detta tillflle meddelade fyra medlemsstater att de inte var intresserade av projektet, fem andra anfrde tekniska problem och sex anfrde ekonomiska problem.
The cost of the FADN, the EAA and the IAHS 49. 
Kostnad fr ISJR, EAA och projektet om inkomster fr jordbrukshushllssektorn 49.
The information collected on the cost is shown in Table 3. 
Den insamlade informationen om kostnaderna visas i tabell 3.
The majority of SAIs emphasised certain advantages but the disparate nature of the information received allows no general conclusions. In 2002, Eurostat and the Member States examined the 
De flesta hgre revisionsmyndigheter har betonat vissa frdelar, men den information som mottagits var alltfr olikartad fr att det skulle g att dra ngra allmnna slutsatser av den. r 2002 underskte Eurostat tillsammans med medlems-
(3) The amounts in column 4 are the result of dividing the figures in column 2 by those in column 3. (4) Column 5 includes payments made by the Commission to the Member States in 2001. 
(3) Vrdena i kolumn 4 r resultaten av vrdena i kolumn 2 dividerat med vrdena (4) Kolumn 5 innehller betalningar som gjorts av kommissionen till medlemsstaterna 2001.
(5) The amounts in column 6 are equal to the difference between the amounts in column 2 and those in column 5. 
(5) Vrdena i kolumn 6 r lika med differensen mellan vrdena i kolumn 2 och vrdena i kolumn 5.
(6) Column 7 shows the cost of the EAA as notified to the Court by the SAIs of the Member States of the EU. (7) Column 8 shows the cost of the IAHS as notified to the Court by the SAIs of the Member States of the EU. 
(6) I kolumn 7 visas kostnaden fr EAA ssom den meddelats revisionsrtten av de hgre revisionsmyndigheterna i Europeiska unionens medlemsstater. (7) Ikolumn8visaskostnadenfrprojektetomjordbrukshushllensinkomsterssomdenmeddelatsrevisionsrttenavdehgrerevisionsmyndigheternaiEuropeiskaunionens medlemsstater.