natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The cross-compliance mechanism has impact but is not being fully exploited 133 Cross-compliance which links direct payments under the common agricultural policy to the respect of a number of requirements was introduced in 2005 (see paragraph 15). 
Systemet med tvrvillkor har effekt men utnyttjas inte fullt ut 133 Tvrvillkor som kopplar direktstd inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken till uppfyllelse av ett antal krav infrdes 2005 (se punkt 15).
The extent to which environmental objectives, in this case improvement of water quality, will be achieved by such a mechanism depends mainly on how demanding the Member Statesу requirements are and on the effectiveness of the enforcement mechanism in place. 
I vilken utstrckning miljml, i det hr fallet bttre vattenkvalitet, uppns med en sdan mekanism beror i frsta hand p hur strnga medlemsstaternas krav r och p hur ndamlsenlig den efter-levnadsmekanism som finns r.
For GAECs this includes enacting the relevant standards in national or regional legislation and defining the practical obligations which farmers are expected to observe. 
Nr det gller normer fr god jordbrukshvd och goda miljfrhllanden innebr det att de ska infra tillmpliga normer i nationell eller regional lagstiftning och faststlla de praktiska krav och normer som jordbrukarna frvntas uppfylla.
Member States also had to define minimum requirements for fertiliser84 and plant protection products85 use that are applicable for certain measures under the rural development programmes (such as the agri-environment measure). 
Medlemsstaterna var ocks tvungna att faststlla minimikrav fr anvndningen av gdselmedel84 och vxtskyddsmedel85 som gller fr vissa tgrder inom landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen (t.ex. miljtgrden i jordbruket).
Requirements to be respected by farmers could be enhanced for better water quality 135 There are two GAEC standards which are of particular importance for the improvement of water quality: (i) the standard on the establishment of buffer strips along water courses and (ii) the standard on soil erosion. 
De krav som jordbrukarna ska uppfylla skulle kunna skrpas i syfte att frbttra vattenkvaliteten 135 Det finns tv normer fr god jordbrukshvd och goda miljfrhllanden som r srskilt viktiga fr bttre vattenkvalitet: i) normen om infrande av buffertzoner lngs vattendrag och ii) normen om markerosion.
However none of the four Member States have established buffer strips of the size recommended by a study conducted for the Commission (see paragraph 106 and Box 2). 
Ingen av de fyra medlemsstaterna har emellertid infrt buffertzoner av den storlek som rekommenderas i en studie som gjorts fr kommissionens rkning (se punkt 106 och ruta 2).
Over and above the requirements of the nitrates directive, Romania has also prohibited the use of pesticides on these buffer strips. 
Utver kraven i nitratdirektivet har Rumnien ocks frbjudit anvndning av bekmpningsmedel i dessa buffertzoner.
The requirements imposed by the Member States as a result of the standard on soil erosion could have been more demanding, as can be seen from the examples given in Box 3. 
De krav som medlemsstaterna har infrt med anledning av normen om markerosion hade kunnat vara strngare, ssom framgr av exemplen i ruta 3.
83 The audit covered the following water quality-related SMRs: SMR-3 regarding the application of sewage sludge on agricultural land, SMR-4 regarding the application of the nitrates directive, SMR-9 regarding the placing of plant protection products on the market. 
83 Revisionen omfattade fljande vattenkvalitetsrelaterade freskrivna verksamhetskrav: verksamhetskrav 3 om spridning av avloppsslam p jordbruksmark, verksamhetskrav 4 om tillmpning av nitratdirektivet och verksamhetskrav 9 om utslppande av vxtskyddsmedel p marknaden.
84 Minimum requirements for fertilisers must include, inter alia, the codes of good agricultural practice introduced under the nitrates directive (see paragraph 102) for farms outside nitrate-vulnerable zones and requirements concerning phosphorus pollution. 
84 Minimikraven fr gdningsmedel mste bland annat omfatta de riktlinjer fr god jordbrukssed som infrdes genom nitratdirektivet (se punkt 102) fr jordbruksfretag utanfr nitratknsliga omrden och krav avseende fosforfroreningar.
85 Minimum requirements for plant protection products must include, inter alia, requirements to have a licence to use the products and meet training obligations, requirements on safe storage, the checking of application machinery and rules on pesticide use close to water and other sensitive sites as established by national legislation. 
85 Minimikraven fr vxtskyddsmedel mste bland annat omfatta krav p tillstnd att anvnda produkterna och uppfyllande av utbildnings-skyldigheten, krav p sker frvaring, kontroll av tillmp-ningsstt samt bestmmelser om anvndning av bekmpningsmedel i nrheten av vatten och andra knsliga omrden i enlighet med nationell lagstiftning.
Observations 48 Examples of erosion-related requirements that could be enhanced in all four Member States The type of crop86 planted is one factor that influences the extent of erosion. 
Iakttagelser 48 Exempel p erosionsrelaterade krav som skulle kunna skrpas i alla fyra medlemsstaterna Typen av grda86 som odlas r en faktor som pverkar erosionens omfattning.
In Romania and Slovakia no crops are forbidden on erosion-vulnerable land. 
I Rumnien och Slovakien r inga grdor frbjudna p erosionsknslig mark.
In the Czech Republic and Hungary certain crops are forbidden on specified land parcels. 
I Tjeckien och Ungern r vissa grdor frbjudna p specifika jordbruksskiften.
However, the surface of land concerned by these rules is lower than the actual surface of land prone to erosion. 
Men den markareal som omfattas av dessa regler r mindre n den faktiska markareal som ltt eroderas.
86 For example row crops such as maize, sunflower and sugar beet are noted for being erosion-inducing crops. 
86 Radodling av t.ex. majs, solrosor och sockerbetor r knd fr att orsaka erosion.
136 With regard to the minimum requirements for rural development payments for the 2007-2013 programme period (see paragraph 134): я concerning phosphorus pollution from fertilisers, none of the four Member States defined requirements although this was required by the relevant EU regulation; я Hungary did not define meaningful minimum fertiliser requirements for farmers outside vulnerable zones and those defined for farmers in vulnerable zones were incomplete; я concerning rules on pesticide use close to water, the four Member States mainly established rules for special protection areas such as those designated for the abstraction of water intended for human consumption. 
136 Vad betrffar minimikraven fr landsbygdsutvecklingsstd under programperioden 2007Đ2013 (se punkt 134) Ń faststllde ingen av de fyra medlemsstaterna ngra krav nr det gllde fosforfrorening frn gdselmedel, trots att de var skyldiga att gra det enligt den tillmpliga EU-frordningen, Ń faststllde inte Ungern ngra meningsfulla minimikrav fr gdselmedel fr jordbrukare utanfr knsliga omrden, och de minimikrav som hade faststllts fr jordbrukare i knsliga omrden var ofullstndiga, Ń faststllde de fyra medlemsstaterna nr det gllde regler om anvndning av bekmpningsmedel nra vatten huvudsakligen regler fr srskilda skyddsomrden, t.ex. dem som faststllts fr uttag av vatten som r avsett att anvndas som dricksvatten.
See also paragraph 135 on buffer strips. 
Se ven punkt 135 om buffertzoner.
137 In the context of the approval of the rural development programmes for the 2014-2020 programme period, the Commission assessed the following ex ante conditionalities: (i) whether GAEC standards were defined and (ii) whether minimum requirements for fertiliser and plant protection products applicable to certain measures under the rural development programmes were fulfilled. 
137 I samband med godknnandet av landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen fr programperioden 2014Đ2020 bedmde kommissionen fljande frhandsvillkor: i) huruvida normer fr god jordbrukshvd och goda miljfrhllanden hade faststllts och ii) huruvida minimikrav fr gdselmedel och vxtskyddsmedel avseende vissa tgrder inom landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen hade uppfyllts.
The Commission did not put into question the adequacy of the requirements in terms of effectiveness to meet the EU water policy objectives despite the weaknesses set out above (see paragraphs 135 and 136)87. 
Kommissionen ifrgasatte inte om kraven som infrts var lmpliga och ndamlsenliga fr att uppfylla EU:s vattenpolitikml trots de brister som anges ovan (se punkterna 135 och 136)87.
Cross-compliance enforcement mechanism, an insufficient deterrent 138 Farmers that do not get aid under the common agricultural policy and/or the rural development programmes are not subject to cross-compliance checks. 
Efterlevnadsmekanismen avseende tvrvillkoren r inte tillrckligt avskrckande 138 Jordbrukare som inte fr std inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken och/eller landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen omfattas inte av kontroller av tvrvillkoren.
In fact, farms with an area of less than one hectare are not eligible for direct payments under the common agricultural policy. 
I sjlva verket r jordbruksfretag med en areal p mindre n en hektar inte berttigade till direktstd inom den gemensamma jordbrukspolitiken.
With the exception of Romania88, the farms having an area of less than 1 hectare represent a negligible share of the agricultural land. 
Med undantag av Rumnien88 str jordbruksfretag med en areal p mindre n en hektar fr en frsumbar del av jordbruksmarken.
87 A similar observation was made by the Court in Special Report No 4/2014, paragraph 46. 
87 Revisionsrtten gjorde en liknande iakttagelse i srskild rapport nr 4/2014 (punkt 46).
88 According to data published by the Romanian Statistical Office 54 % of farm holdings have an area of less than 1 hectare and represent close to 10 % of the agricultural land. 
88 Enligt uppgifter som Rumniens statistikkontor har offentliggjort har 54 % av jordbruksfretagen en areal p mindre n en hektar och str fr nstan 10 % av jordbruksmarken.
Observations 49 139 The Court concludes that in terms of sample size the EU requirement89 to cover 1 % of the farmers that have to apply the cross-compliance standards was slightly exceeded by all four Member States in 2011-2013. 
Iakttagelser 49 139 Revisionsrtten konstaterar att nr det gller urvalsstorlek vertrffades EU-kravet89 att kontrollera 1 % av de jordbrukare som mste uppfylla tvrvillkoren ngot av alla fyra medlemsstaterna mellan 2011 och 2013.
A rate of 1 % implies that, on average, there is a probability that a farmer will be checked once every 100 years. 
En andel p 1 % innebr att sannolikheten fr att en jordbrukare blir kontrollerad i genomsnitt r en gng vart hundrade r.
However, the risk analysis partially loses its meaning as the actual sample checked does not necessarily consist only of those farmers considered highest in the risk ranking. 
Men riskanalysen frlorar delvis sin betydelse eftersom det faktiska urval som kontrolleras inte ndvndigtvis enbart bestr av de jordbrukare som anses ligga hgst i riskrankningen.
This is due to the fact that the final selection also takes into account the human resources available at the national/regional authority carrying out the checks. 
Detta beror p att man i det slutgiltiga urvalet ocks tar hnsyn till de personalresurser som finns tillgngliga vid den nationella eller regionala myndighet som genomfr kontrollerna.
141 With regard to the content of the checks, the Court found that: я concerning SMR-4 on the application of the nitrates directive, the checks in Hungary, Romania and Slovakia cover the majority of the requirements defined in the nitrate action programmes. 
141 Vad betrffar innehllet i kontrollerna konstaterade revisionsrtten fljande: Ń Nr det gller det freskrivna verksamhetskravet 4 om tillmpning av nitratdirektivet omfattar kontrollerna i Ungern, Rumnien och Slovakien merparten av de krav som faststllts i nitrattgrds-programmen.
In the Czech Republic, some requirements of the nitrate action programme are covered by the cross-compliance checks while others are covered by the тnational checksу (see paragraph 119); я concerning the minimum requirements applicable for certain measures under the rural development programmes, the checks in Hungary were insufficient (see paragraph 136). 
I Tjeckien tcks vissa krav i nitrattgrdsprogrammen av tvrvillkorskontrollerna, medan andra tcks av de nationella kontrollerna (se punkt 119). Ń I frga om de minimikrav som gller vissa tgrder inom landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen var kontrollerna i Ungern otillrckliga (se punkt 136).
In the Czech Republic and Romania the checks did not cover the requirement on manure storage capacity. 
I Tjeckien och Rumnien omfattade inte kontrollerna kravet p kapacitet fr gdsellagring.
In Romania not all aspects of the minimum requirements for plant protection productsу use were defined and thus checks were limited to verifying that only authorised products were used. 
I Rumnien hade inte alla aspekter av minimikraven fr anvndning av vxtskyddsmedel faststllts, och kontrollerna begrnsades drfr till verifiering av att endast godknda produkter anvndes.
89 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 of 30 November 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation 73/2009 as regards cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system, under the direct support schemes for farmers provided for that Regulation, as well as for the implementation of Council Regulation 1234/2007 as regards cross-compliance under the support scheme provided for the wine sector (OJ L 316, 2.12.2009, p. 
89 Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 1122/2009 av den 30 november 2009 om tillmpningsfreskrifter fr rdets frordning (EG) nr 73/2009 vad gller tvrvillkor, modulering och det integrerade administrations-och kontrollsystem inom de system fr direktstd till jordbrukare som infrs genom den frordningen och om tillmpningsfreskrifter fr rdets frordning (EG) nr 1234/2007 nr det gller tvrvillkoren fr std inom vinsektorn (EUT L 316, 2.12.2009, s.
90 In all four Member States the risk factors used for the sample selection changed over the years, reflecting a certain difficulty in establishing appropriate factors. 
90 I alla fyra medlemsstaterna ndrades de riskfaktorer som anvndes vid urvalet under rens lopp, vilket visar att man hade vissa svrigheter att faststlla lmpliga faktorer.
Observations 50 143 The effectiveness of the checks is also affected by the fact that important evidence takes the form of declarations made by the farmers themselves, in particular in the form of the fertilisation register (which includes data on the period of fertilisation and the quantities applied). 
Iakttagelser 50 143 Kontrollernas ndamlsenlighet pverkas ocks av det faktum att viktiga bevis utgrs av deklarationer som jordbrukarna sjlva gr, srskilt i form av gdselregister (som innehller uppgifter om gdslingsperiod och de kvantiteter som sprids).
The more frequent the updates of the register, the more accurate the information will be. 
Ju oftare registret uppdateras, desto exaktare r informationen.
The register is either to be kept continuously (Hungary, Romania and Slovakia) or has to be updated at the end of every month (the Czech Republic). 
Registret ska antingen fras fortlpande (Ungern, Rumnien och Slovakien) eller uppdateras i slutet av varje mnad (Tjeckien).
144 Finally, for many requirements the farmerуs cost of compliance (for example in terms of foregone production and income) is higher than the fine liable to be imposed, i.e. the maximum reduction of the aid amount is at most only 5 %91 and therefore such reductions do not have any real deterrent effect92. 
144 Nr det gller mnga krav, slutligen, r jordbrukarens kostnader fr efterlevnad (t.ex. i form av produktions-och inkomstbortfall) hgre n de bter som kan utdmas, dvs. minskningen p hgst 5 %91 av det stdbelopp som jordbrukaren har erhllit. Sdana minskningar har drfr ingen avskrckande effekt92.
The most important measures used in the four Member States having a direct positive impact on water quality are the following: я measure 121 тmodernisation of agricultural holdingsу: the four Member States97 used this measure to finance manure storage vessels. The annual implementation reports describing the progress of the measures do not provide information on the number of storage facilities and the co-financed investment cost; 146 These programmes contain sets of measures to which the target populations (e.g. farmers) can voluntarily commit. 
Landsbygdsutvecklingstgrdernas potential att komma till rtta med vattenkvalitetsproblem utnyttjas inte fullt ut 145 De tgrder som kompletterade den befintliga lagstiftningen (ssom nitratdirektivet) och som angavs i frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt var huvudsakligen kopplade till landsbygdsutvecklingprogrammen93. 146 Programmen innehller uppsttningar av tgrder som mlpopulationerna (t.ex. jordbrukare) frivilligt kan ta sig att vidta.
Beneficiaries of rural development measures undertake to comply with specific conditions set by their Member State. 
Mottagare av landsbygdsutvecklingsstd frbinder sig att uppfylla srskilda villkor som faststlls av medlemsstaten.
Less than 30 % of the agricultural land is covered by agri-environment schemes that can lead to an improvement in water quality 147 The Court found that the pollution pressure on water from agriculture was described in very general terms in the 2007-2013 rural development programmes of the four Member States and was not necessarily consistent94 with the information in the river basin management plans95. 
Mindre n 30 % av jordbruksmarken omfattas av program fr miljvnligt jordbruk som kan leda till bttre vattenkvalitet 147 Revisionsrtten konstaterade att jordbrukets froreningstryck p vatten beskrevs i mycket allmnna ordalag i de fyra medlemsstaternas landsbygdsutvecklingsprogram fr 2007Đ2013 och att det inte ndvndigtvis verens-stmde94 med informationen i frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt95.
91 The Commission regulation sets the reduction, as a general rule, at 3 % of the amount granted. 
91 I kommissionens frordning anges att minskningen i allmnhet ska vara 3 % av det beviljade beloppet.
Member States may decide not to impose any reduction or to reducetherateto1%orto increase it to a maximum of 5 %. 
Medlemsstaterna kan besluta att inte tillmpa ngon minskning eller att minska procentsatsen till 1 % eller ka den till hgst 5 %.
Higher rates apply to repeated cases of non-compliance and to cases of non-compliance considered by the Member States as being intentional. 
De hgre procentsatserna gller upprepade fall av bristande efterlevnad och fall av bristande efterlevnad som medlemsstaterna bedmer som avsiktliga.
92 See Special Report No 8/2008, paragraph 69. 
92 Se punkt 69 i srskild rapport nr 8/2008.
93 There is one rural development programme for each of the four Member States visited. 
93 Var och en av de fyra beskta medlemsstaterna har ett landsbygdsutvecklingsprogram.
94 A similar observation was made by the Court in Special Report No 4/2014, paragraph 52. 
94 Revisionsrtten gjorde en liknande iakttagelse i srskild rapport nr 4/2014 (punkt 52).
95 Whereas the environmental assessments for rural development programmes were drafted in 2006, the environmental analyses carried out in the context of the river basin management plans were to be completed not later than 2 December 2004 (Article 5 of the water framework directive). 
95 Medan miljbedmningarna till landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammen utarbetades 2006 skulle de miljanalyser som gjordes inom ramen fr frvaltningsplanerna fr avrinningsdistrikt vara avslutade senast den 22 december 2004 (artikel 5 i ramdirektivet fr vatten).
96 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 of 15 December 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p. 
96 Kommissionens frordning (EG) nr 1974/2006 av den 15 december 2006 om tillmpningsfreskrifter fr rdets frordning (EG) nr 1698/2005 om std fr landsbygdsutveckling frn Europeiska jordbruksfonden fr landsbygdsutveckling (EJFLU) (EUT L 368, 23.12.2006, s.
97 In Romania the storage vessels are generally made available by local authorities. 
97 I Rumnien tillhandahlls lagringsbehllarna i regel av de lokala myndigheterna.
These authorities were not eligible for a grant from the rural development programme. 
Dessa myndigheter var inte berttigade till bidrag frn landsbygdsutvecklingsprogrammet.
Observations 51 98 Less funds are allocated by the four Member States to the equivalent measure under the 2014-2020 programme period. 
Iakttagelser 51 98 De fyra medlemsstaterna har anslagit mindre ekonomiska resurser till motsvarande tgrd under programperioden 2014Đ2020.
This is particularly the case for Slovakia (63 % less) and Hungary (43 % less). 
Detta gller srskilt Slovakien (63 % mindre) och Ungern (43 % mindre).
99 According to a paper on тWater quality improvements from afforestation in an agricultural catchment in Denmark illustrated by the INCA modelу by A. Bastrup-Birk and P. Gundersen published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 
99 Enligt en uppsats om vatten-kvalitetsfrbttringar genom beskogning i ett avrinningsomrde i ett jordbruksomrde i Danmark illustrerat av INCA-modellen av A. Bastrup-Birk och P. Gundersen, som publicerats i Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (volym 8, nr 4, s.
8, No 4), pp. 764-777, тa change of land use from intensive agriculture to forest substantially reduces the leaching fluxes of nitrate to ground and surface water, largely through the cessation of fertiliser and manure N input.у 100 Reporting to the Commission for predefined indicator тR6 я area under successful management contributing to water qualityу: Czech Republic: 844717ha(or20%oftotal agricultural land) and Hungary 59959ha(or1%oftotal agricultural land). 
764Đ777), minskar ndrad markanvndning frn intensivt jordbruk till skog betydligt lckaget av kvve till grund-och ytvatten, vilket till stor del beror p att tillfrseln av kvve-haltigt gdselmedel och stallgdsel upphr. 100 Rapportering till kommissionen om den p frhand faststllda indikatorn R6 Đ omrde med god frvaltning som bidrar till vattenkvaliteten: Tjeckien: 844 717 hektar (eller 20 % av den totala jordbruksmarken) och Ungern 59 959 hektar (eller 1 % av den totala jordbruksmarken).
101 Slovakia also reported 348 860 ha under measure 226 тrestoring forestry potential and introducing preventive actionу. 
101 Slovakien rapporterade ocks 348 860 hektar inom tgrd 226 Órestaurering av skogstill-stndet och infrande av frebyggande tgrderÓ.
As the main aim is to restore forests damaged by natural disasters and fires, the impact on water quality is not of a direct nature as it does not increase forest land. 
Eftersom huvudsyftet r att terstlla skogar som skadats av naturkatastrofer och brnder r effekten p vattenkvaliteten inte alltid direkt d tgrden inte kar skogsmarken.
102 Grasslands can reduce soil erosion. 
102 Grsmarker kan minska mark-erosionen.