natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One of the objectives of moving from price support to direct payments was exactly to discourage intensification of arable production. 
Ett av mlen med vergngen frn prisstd till direkta utbetalningar var just att motverka intensifiering av produktionen av jordbruksgrdor.
This was the case for cereals for some years in the mid-1990s where a strong world market kept internal market prices well above institutional prices. 
Under ngra r i mitten av nittiotalet ledde de hga vrldsmarknadspriserna p spannml till att priserna p den inre marknaden med god marginal versteg de institutionella priserna.
It is therefore not surprising that the reduction in the use of fertiliser and agrochemicals slowed down during these years. 
Det r drfr inte verraskande att minskningen av utnyttjandet av gdningsmnen och kemikalier skedde i en lngsammare takt under dessa r.
C 353/44 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.12.2000 13 and 14. 
C 353/44 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.12.2000 13Đ14.
The base areas and the premiums per hectare are based on historic data on yield and land use. 
Basarealer och bidrag per hektar baseras p tidigare uppgifter om avkastning och markutnyttjande.
As the principle in the reform was to compensate the farmer for the income loss due to the price reduction, it was only fair to grant a higher compensation to irrigated land than non-irrigated as the loss suffered was also higher due to the higher yield per hectare. 
Eftersom principen i reformen var att kompensera jordbrukaren fr den inkomstfrlust som berodde p prissnkningen, var det bara rimligt att bevilja hgre kompensation till konstbevattnad mark n till icke-konstbevattnad mark eftersom frlusten ocks var hgre p grund av den hgre avkastningen per hektar.
It should also be mentioned that in some parts of southern Europe agriculture is to a large extent only possible through irrigation. 
Det br ocks nmnas att i vissa delar av sdra Europa r det endast mjligt att bedriva jordbruk med hjlp av konstbevattning.
The premium differentiation was maintained in Agenda 2000. 
Bidragsdifferentieringen behlls i Agenda 2000.
Once the base areas were established, they have remained fixed. 
Nr vl basarealerna hade faststllts, har de frblivit ofrndrade.
Whereas the premium differentiation reflects averages of different yield potentials it does not entail the obligation on the side of the farmers to continue or introduce irrigation. 
I den utstrckning bidragsskillnaderna speglar ett genomsnitt av olika avkastningspotentialer medfr detta inte ngot krav p att jordbrukarna mste fortstta att infra bevattning.
Therefore the introduction of direct payments should not entail any incentive to increase irrigation. 
Infrandet av direkta betalningar br drfr inte medfra ngon stimulans att utka den areal som konstbevattnas.
The fact that compensatory payments have not been the same for all products may have had some influence on farmers’ decisions on land use, although in general there has not been an increase in the production of maize in the south of Europe. 
Det faktum att kompensationbidragen inte har varit lika stora fr alla grdor kan ha pverkat jordbrukarnas beslut om markutnytt-jandet ven om det i allmnhet inte har skett ngon kning av produktionen av majs i sdra Europa.
With Agenda 2000 the payments per tonne will be the same for all cereals and oilseeds and thereby neutralise any effect that the differentiated payments may have had. 
Enligt Agenda 2000 kommer arealstdet per ton att vara desamma fr all spannml och alla oljevxter och kommer drigenom att neutralisera eventuella effekter som de differentierade bidragsbeloppen kan ha haft.
The high premium for durum wheat is inevitably an incentive for this crop. 
Det hga bidraget fr durumvete r ofrnkomligen en stimulans till produktion av denna grda.
Production was however limited in the past to individual eligible areas, and today to maximum guaranteed areas for each member state concerned. 
Produktionen var dock tidigare begrnsad till enskilda stdberttigade omrden och r idag begrnsad till maximalt garanterade omrden fr varje berrd medlemsstat.
The Commission agrees that despite the clear rules concerning the eligibility for arable aid, in practice there have been problems. 
Kommissionen instmmer i att det trots de tydliga reglerna fr odlingsstd i praktiken har frekommit problem.
It cannot be excluded that in the course of establishing the base area, some land slipped into it which had previously been used differently, e.g. grassland so long in rotation that it would not fulfil the reference period criteria. 
Det kan inte uteslutas att under frfarandet fr att faststlla basarealen, viss mark ocks kom att omfattas av denna, trots att den tidigare hade utnyttjats p annat stt, t.ex. vall och bete som har varit s lnge i rotation att den inte kunde uppfylla kriterierna fr referensperiod.
Another example is grassland classified in the public land register as ‘arable land’, which in practise makes it almost impossible to prove that it is not eligible. 
Ett annat exempel r vall och bete som i det offentliga fastighetsregistret klassificeras som kermark vilket i praktiken gr det nstan omjligt att bevisa att denna areal inte r stdberttigad.
However, the criticism that the reform gave incentives for land-use changes is only valid in the set-up phase, while — once the register of parcels is established — direct payments give no incentive for further changes in land use. 
Kritiken att reformen stimulerade till frndring av markutnyttjande ger emellertid bara giltighet fr inledningsfasen eftersom, nr vl registret ver jordbruksskiften r faststllt, direkta utbetalningar inte stimulerar till ytterligare frndringar av markutnyttjande.
According to the information available to the Commission, these problems have not been widespread and have not had a significant influence on the determination of eligible areas. 
Enligt de uppgifter som kommissionen frfogar ver har dessa problem varit begrnsade och har inte ptagligt pverkat faststllandet av stdberttigade omrden.
As indicated in the reply to points 13 and 14, the arable premiums were introduced to compensate farmers for the income loss due to the cut in support prices. 
Som anges i svaren till punkterna 13 och 14 infrdes odlings-stden fr att kompensera jordbrukarna fr den inkomstfrlust som berodde p snkningen av stdpriserna.
The farmer’s decision on the quantity of inputs is normally based on the input-output price relation, i.e. the prices of fertiliser, agro-chemicals, etc. on one side and the final product (cereals) on the other side. 
En jordbrukares beslut om kvantiteten insatsvaror baseras vanligtvis p frhllandet mellan priserna fr insatsvaror och produktion dvs. priser p gdningsmnen, kemikalier etc.  ena sidan och den slutliga produkten (spannml)  den andra.
The compensatory payment is a fixed element and does therefore not influence the farmer’s decision on inputs. 
Kompensationsbidraget r ett fast inslag och pverkar drfr inte jordbrukarens beslut om insatsvaror.
One of the very important reasons for introducing direct payments was exactly to reduce the incentive of high prices to intensify production. 
En av de mycket viktiga orsakerna till att infra direkta utbetalningar var just att minska den stimulans till intensifiering av produktionen som hgre priser utgr.
Apart from this, it is important to note that intensive production is not necessarily harmful to the environment. 
Frnsett detta r det viktigt att notera att intensiv produktion inte ndvndigtvis r skadlig fr miljn.
Intensive production can be sustainable within both arable and livestock production. 
Intensiv produktion kan vara hllbar inom bde produktion av jordbruksgrdor och animalie-produktion.
This is notably the case where an improved eco-efficiency (emission per unit of output) overcompensates the environmental effect of higher input use. 
Detta r srskilt fallet nr frbttrad miljeffektivitet (utslpp per produktionsenhet) verkompenserar miljeffekten av strre utnyttjande av insatsvaror.
See reply to point 10. 
Se svar p punkt 10.
In the new market organisation for beef and veal, Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999, it is laid down that for the extensification premium the calculation of the stocking density must include all grazing animals on a farm. 
I den nya gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr ntktt, frordning (EG) nr 1254/1999 faststlls att alla betande djur i ett jordbruksfretag skall inkluderas nr djurttheten berknas i samband med extensifieringsersttningen.
This is one of the considerable environmental improvements introduced by Agenda 2000. 
Detta r en av de strre miljfrbttringar som infrts genom Agenda 2000.
In other Member States, applying a density ceiling of 2 LU/ha has had a clear effect of discouraging intensive livestock farming. 
I andra medlemsstater har tillmpningen av bestmmelserna om en hgsta tilltna djurtthet p 2 djurenheter per hektar ftt mycket tydliga effekter till nackdel fr intensiv djuruppfdning.
Mainly because of the stocking density rule, the number of premiums in several Member States is well below the regional ceiling for special beef premiums and potential suckler-cow premium rights. 
Det r frmst p grund av frekomsten av djurtthetsfaktorn som antalet bidrag i flera medlemsstater r mycket lgre n det regionala taket fr det srskilda bidraget och fr potentiella rttigheter till am-och dikoersttningen.
This is true especially in Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and Denmark. 
Detta r bland annat fallet fr Italien, Nederlnderna, Belgien och Danmark.
8.12.2000 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 353/45 The impact of these measures on intensive livestock farming was thought sufficiently great by the Council that, in November 1996, it asked the Commission to look into appropriate solutions to the specific situation of regions traditionally dependent on intensive production. 
8.12.2000 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 353/45 Dessa tgrders effekt p systemen fr intensiv djuruppfdning bedmdes vara tillrckligt stor fr att rdet i november 1996 skulle anmoda kommissionen Óatt granska lmpliga lsningar fr den srskilda situationen i regioner som traditionellt varit beroende av intensiv produktionÓ.
In the case of Spain, the abusive practice referred to by the Court was noticed by the Commission, which asked the Spanish authorities to take appropriate measures. 
Nr det gller Spanien har kommissionen noterat de otillbrliga metoder som revisionsrtten nmner och har begrt att de spanska myndigheterna skall vidta lmpliga tgrder.
This is particularly important in the case of big holdings with a high number of cattle. 
Detta r srskilt viktigt nr det gller stora fretag med ett stort antal djur.
The exemption for small farmers was introduced for social and administrative reasons. 
Undantaget fr sm producenter infrdes av sociala och administrativa orsaker.
In some countries, like Portugal, a considerable number of farmers base their livelihood on a small cattle production. 
I vissa lnder som exempelvis i Portugal baserar ett betydande antal jordbrukare sitt uppehlle p en liten djurproduktion.
The stocking density limit would be difficult to fulfil for many of these farmers if they were still to make a living out of the production. 
Fr mnga av dessa jordbrukare vore det svrt att uppfylla reglerna om djurtthet och samtidigt fortfarande kunna frsrja sig p sin produktion.
The exemption was therefore maintained in Agenda 2000. 
Undantaget bibehlls drfr i Agenda 2000.
The Commission acknowledges that overgrazing has become a problem in certain areas. 
Kommissionen erknner att verbetning har blivit ett problem i vissa omrden.
An evaluation study of the common market organisation for sheepmeat is being undertaken, including an examination of the impact of the regime on the environment. 
En utvrdering hller p att genomfras av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr frktt, och denna studie inbegriper en granskning av systemets inverkan p miljn.
The Commission will draw its conclusions once the study has been completed, which is foreseen for spring 2000. 
Kommissionen kommer att dra sina slutsatser nr denna studie har slutfrts vilket frvntas ske vren 2000.
Cross-compliance was an option open to Member States under Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 as amended by Regulation (EC) No3611/93. 
Mjligheten fr medlemsstaterna att stlla miljvillkor terfinns i frordning (EEG) nr 805/68, ndrad genom frordning (EG) nr 3611/93.
A further step forward was taken in Agenda 2000 with the inclusion of a similar but now mandatory provision in Council Regulation (EC) No 1259/1999 on direct support. 
Ett ytterligare steg togs genom Agenda 2000, eftersom en liknande bestmmelse, men obligatorisk, nu finns i rdets frordning (EG) nr 1259/1999 nr det gller system med direktstd.
The improvements made under Agenda 2000 to the extensification scheme involve taking into account not only all the bovine animals on the farm (see point 20) but also the fodder area. 
De frbttringar av systemet med extensifieringsersttning som infrdes genom Agenda 2000 gller inte bara hnsynstagande till alla befintliga ntkreatur (se punkt 20) utan ocks till grovfoderarealerna.
The crops covered in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1251/ 1999 (Aid for producers of certain arable crops) will no longer be counted as ’fodder area’ for extensification payments. 
De grdor som anges i bilaga I till frordning (EG) nr 1251/1999 (std till producenter av vissa jordbruksgr-dor) betraktas inte lngre som grovfoderareal nr det gller extensifieringsersttningen.
In addition, the fodder areas taken into consideration must include at least 50 % grazing land. 
Dessutom mste de grovfoderarealer som beaktas omfatta minst 50 % bete.
Lower price support in the arable sector normally leads to an extensification in this sector as indicated in the reply to point 16. 
Som angivits i svaret till punkt 16, leder lgre prisstd inom sektorn fr jordbruksgrdor vanligen till en extensifiering i denna sektor.
However, lower cereal prices may have the opposite effect in the livestock sector, where cereal is one of the most important inputs. 
Lgre spannmlspriser kan dock f motsatt effekt inom djursektorn dr spannml r en av de viktigaste insatsvarorna.
Lower input prices will improve the relative competitiveness of intensive production systems. 
Lgre priser p insatsvaror kommer att frbttra den relativa konkurrenskraften hos intensiva produktionssystem.
This shows that reducing or withdrawing price support does not in all cases lead to positive environmental effects. 
Detta visar att minskat eller slopat prisstd inte alltid ger positiva miljeffekter.
As indicated in the reply to the Court’s introduction, the environmental problems in pig and poultry production should mainly be addressed through the Nitrate Directive. 
Som ppekats i svaret till inledningen, br miljproblemen inom svin-och fjderfproduktionen frmst lsas genom nitratdirektivet.
COMs unreformed by ‘Mac Sharry’ 27 and 28. 
Gemensamma marknadsorganisationer som inte reformerades under MacSharry 27Đ28.
With the reform of the fruit and vegetable sector, withdrawals are now governed by stricter rules for the disposal of fruit. 
Efter reformen av sektorn fr frukt och grnsaker omfattas nu tertag av striktare regler nr det gller destruktion av fruk-ten.
According to Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 Member States are to draw up national frameworks for the environmental aspects of operational programmes and market withdrawals, and producer organisations are requested to notify to the national authorities the measures taken to ensure environmentally sound practice in connection with withdrawals. 
Enligt frordning (EG) nr 2200/96 skall medlemsstaterna utarbeta nationella ramar fr miljaspekter i frga om operativa program och tertag och producentorganisationer mste till de nationella myndigheterna anmla de tgrder som vidtas fr att skerstlla miljmssigt goda metoder nr det gller tertag.
With the reform of the milk sector, new direct premiums will be introduced from 2005: a premium per tonne of milk within the milk quota and an area premium for permanent pasture. 
Genom reformen av mjlksektorn kommer nya direktstd att infras frn 2005. Ett bidrag per ton mjlk inom mjlkkvoten och ett arealbidrag fr permanent betesmark.
These measures clearly encourage an extensification of production. 
Dessa tgrder stimulerar otvetydigt till en extensifiering av produktionen.
Tobacco production may not be the most environmentally friendly form of farming. 
Tobaksproduktionen r frvisso inte den mest miljvnliga typen av odling.
Nevertheless, in Regulation (EC) No 2848/98 it is foreseen in Article 40 that specific aid can be granted to environmental protection measures. 
I frordning (EG) nr 2848/98 anges dock i artikel 40 en mjlighet att bevilja srskilt std fr miljskyddstgrder.
It must also be taken into consideration that this sector provides an important economic contribution to farmers and local communities, often in remote regions of the European Union. 
I detta sammanhang mste man ocks beakta att denna sektor ger ett viktigt ekonomiskt bidrag till jordbrukare och lokala samhllen ofta i avlgsna omrden i gemenskapen.
The Commission has recently tabled a proposal for a reform of the flax and hemp common market organisation. 
Kommissionen presenterade nyligen ett frslag till reform av den gemensamma organisationen av marknaden fr spnadslin och hampa.
The two crops will be included in the general support scheme for arable crops with the same level of support as for cereals from 2002/ 2003 onwards. 
Dessa tv grdor kommer frn och med 2002/2003 att infrlivas i det allmnna stdsystemet fr jordbruksgrdor med samma stdniv som fr spannml.
A second part of the proposal consists of additional support for the processing of flax and hemp grown for fibre. 
En andra del av frslaget bestr av ett ytterligare std fr bearbetning av spnadslin och hampa som odlas fr fiber.
The considerable overproduction of flax in recent years in relation to market capacity should cease due to the introduction of national guaranteed quantities. 
Genom infrandet av nationella garantikvantiteter br den betydande verproduktion av spnadslin i frhllande till marknadskapacitet som konstaterats under senare r upphra.
It should be noted that flax and hemp can be beneficial to the environment as they do not need a lot of fertilisers and pesticides. 
Det br noteras att odling av spnadslin och hampa kan vara positiv fr miljn eftersom dessa grdor inte krver mycket gdningsmnen och bekmpningsmedel.
The sector was reformed by the Council in 1995. 
Sektorn reformerades av rdet 1995.
In 1999, the aid level per tonne was cut for the first time when the maximum guaranteed quantity at Community level was exceeded. 
Under 1999 snktes stdet per ton fr frsta gngen, till fljd av att den maximala garanterade gemenskapskvantiteten hade verskridits.
C 353/46 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 8.12.2000 As part of the Commission’s constant monitoring of the various aid schemes to evaluate their respective merits in terms of economics, farming practice, social impact and the environment, it would like to follow up on the Court’s comments and ascertain whether a further reform of the sector should be proposed to the Council, not excluding the possibility of abandoning the scheme. 
C 353/46 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 8.12.2000 Kommissionen avser beakta revisionsrttens ppekanden i sin kontinuerliga utvrdering av de olika stdsystemen och deras ekonomiska, jordbruksmssiga, sociala respektive miljmssiga frdelar och avgra om det r lmpligt att fresl rdet en ny reform av sektorn varvid mjligheten att slopa systemet inte skall uteslutas.
The quote makes no difference between the effects of price support and direct payments despite common sense among economists about the significant difference in impact. 
I texten ovan grs ingen skillnad mellan effekterna av prisstd och direkt std, trots att den allmnna uppfattningen bland ekonomer r att skillnaden r betydande.
Whereas price support does indeed stimulate intensification, direct payments are a fixed element in the farmer’s accounts which leaves the decisions on input use unaffected. 
Medan prisstd faktiskt stimulerar intensifiering utgr de direkta betalningarna en fast del i jordbrukarens bokfring vilket gr att besluten om anvndning av insatsvaror inte pverkas.
The European Environment Agency provides in its second Assessment Report of 1999, page 407, evidence of reduced emission from agriculture. 
P sidan 407 i sin andra utvrderingsrapport fr 1999 lgger Europeiska miljbyrn fram bevis p minskade utslpp frn jordbruket.
An even more favourable picture of the significantly improved eco-efficiency of agriculture can be drawn when emissions are related to total production as shown on page 33 of the above report. 
Nr utslppen r relaterade till den totala produktionen, se sidan 33 i ovannmnda rapport, ger detta en nnu frdelaktigare bild av den betydligt frbttrade miljeffekten.
Furthermore, the Commission would like to underline that the significance of the reform is evident from the fact that over eight years guaranteed prices were lowered by a total of 45 % for cereals and 40 % for beef. 
Genom att peka p det faktum att de garanterade priserna inom tta r har minskat med totalt 45 % fr spannml och 40 % fr ntktt vill kommissionen understryka att reformens betydelse r uppenbar.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE ‘ACCOMPANYING MEASURES’ In 1998, the Commission’s Directorate-General for Agriculture produced a working document on the evaluation of the agri-environment programmes (1) (hereinafter the ‘1998 working docu-ment’). 
DE KOMPLETTERANDE TGRDERNAS MILJ INVERKAN Kommissionens generaldirektorat fr jordbruk lade 1998 fram ett arbetsdokument om en utvrdering av miljprogrammen fr jordbruket (1) (nedan kallat 1998 rs arbetsdokument).
This extensive document of over 200 pages was published (including on the Internet) at the request of the European Parliament and presents a full analysis of the Commission’s views of the successes and shortcomings of agri-environment implementation, drawing on over 150 reports from Member States. 
P begran av Europaparlamentet publicerades (inklusive p Internet) detta omfattande dokument som p drygt 200 sidor ger en fullstndig analys av kommissionens syn p framgngar och svagheter nr det gller miljtgrder fr jordbruket. Analysen baseras p ver 150 rapporter frn medlemsstaterna.
The Commission notes that the Court has in places quoted from this document and in this reply further references are made. 
Kommissionen noterar att revisionsrtten p vissa stllen i sin rapport citerar detta dokument och i detta svar grs ytterligare hnvisningar till dokumentet.
At point 8, the Court notes that the focus of its review was on the difficulties in implementation and this reply inevitably also focuses on these aspects. 
I punkt 8 anger revisionsrtten att dess granskning fokuserar p svrigheterna med genomfrandet och detta svar inriktas drmed p dessa aspekter.
A more balanced analysis of the negative and positive effects of agri-environment programmes is given in the 1998 working document. 
En mer balanserad analys av de negativa och positiva effekterna av miljprogrammen fr jordbruket terfinns i 1998 rs arbetsdokument.