natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The second action was tore-establishaviablepoliceforceinAlbania,alsoimplemented (1) In 1999, budget headings B7-6 6 1 тCommunity participation in action concerning anti-personnel minesу, B7-7 0 0 тSupport for democracy in the countries of central and eastern Europe, including the Republics formerly part of Yugoslaviaу, B7-7 0 9 тSupport for, and supervision of, electoral processesу. In 1998, budget headings B7-6 6 1 тCommunity participation in action concerning anti-personnel minesу, B7-7 0 0 тSupport for democracy in the countries of central and eastern Europe, including the Republics formerly part of Yugoslaviaу, B7-7 0 9 тSupport for, and supervision of, electoral processesу. In 1997, budget headings B7-6 6 1 тCommunity participation in action concerning anti-personnel minesу, B7-7 0 0 1 тCommunity measures to help democracy and support the peace process for the Republics formerly part of Yugoslavia, B7-7 0 9у тSupport for, and supervision 2 of, electoral processesу. () Council Regulations (EC) No 975/1999 and (EC) No 976/1999 3 (OJ L 120, 8.5.1999). () Council Regulations (EC) No 1257/96 of 20 June 1996 concerning humanitarian aid (OJ L 163, 2.7.1996) and (EC) No 2258/96 of 22 November 1996 on rehabilitation and reconstruction operations in developing countries (OJ L 306, 28.11.1996). by the WEU (see also paragraph 32). 
Den andra tgrden gllde att terupprtta en funktionsduglig poliskr i Albanien, vilket ven detta (1) r 1999, budgetposterna B7Đ6 6 1 ÓGemenskapens deltagande i tgrder rrande truppminorÓ, B7Đ7 0 0 ÓStd till demokratin i lnderna i Central-och steuropa, inklusive de republiker som uppsttt ur fre detta JugoslavienÓ, B7Đ7 0 9 ÓStd till demokratiseringsproces-ser och till understd och vervakning av valfrfarandenÓ. r 1998, budgetposterna B7Đ6 6 1 ÓGemenskapens deltagande i tgrder rrande truppminorÓ, B7Đ7 0 0 ÓStd till demokratin i lnderna i Central-och steuropa, inklusive de republiker som uppsttt ur fre detta JugoslavienÓ, B7Đ7 0 9 ÓStd till demokratiseringsproces-ser och till understd och vervakning av valfrfarandenÓ. r 1997, budgetposterna B7Đ6 6 1 ÓGemenskapens deltagande i tgrderrrandetruppminorÓ,B7Đ7001ÓGemenskapstgrdertill std fr demokratin och std fr fredsprocessen i de republiker som uppsttturfredettaJugoslavienÓ,B7Đ709ÓStdtilldemokratise-2 ringsprocesser och till understd och vervakning av valfrfarandenÓ. () Rdets frordningar (EG) nr 975/1999 och (EG) nr 976/1999 (EGT 3 L 120, 8.5.1999). () Rdets frordningar (EG) nr 1257/96 av den 20 juni 1996 om humanitrt bistnd (EGT L 163, 2.7.1996) och (EG) nr 2258/96 av den 22 november 1996 om teranpassnings-och teruppbyggnadsarbete till frmn fr utvecklingslnder (EGT L 306, 28.11.1996). genomfrdes av VEU (se ven punkt 32).
It is difficult to see how this capacity-building operation falls under the terms of Article 17. 
Det r svrt att se hur denna tgrd fr att bygga upp kapacitet kan ing i villkoren i artikel 17.
At the time of the Courtуs Opinion No 1/97, some of the appropriations were placed initially under Title B0-4 тReserves and provisionsу, and transferred to the budget headings in subsection B8 тCommon foreign and security policyу. 
Vid tidpunkten fr revisionsrttens yttrande nr 1/97 placerades vissa av anslagen ursprungligen under avdelning B0Đ4 ÓReserver och avsttningarÓ och verfrdes till budgetrubrikerna i underavsnitt B8 ÓGemensam utrikes-och skerhetspolitikÓ.
The Court criticised the delays in releasing funds as a result of cumbersome procedures for transferring appropriations from the reserve to the operational budget. 
Revisionsrtten kritiserade frseningen i frga om att frigra medel till fljd av det invecklade frfarandet fr verfring av anslag frn reserven till driftbudgeten.
The reserve has not existed since 1998, which has simplified procedures. 
Reserven har sedan 1998 inte existerat, vilket har frenklat frfarandet.
Contributions in kind and co-financing 35. 
Bidrag in natura och samfinansiering 35.
The budget subsections B7 and B8 do not show all costs of the operations. 
Budgetens underavsnitt B7 och B8 visar inte samtliga kostnader fr tgrderna.
The Council and the Commission second staff to the EUSR and furthermore the Council has provided office space in Brussels (4) for three EUSRs. 
Rdet och kommissionen lnade ut personal till Europeiska unionens srskilda representanter och rdet har dessutom stllt kontorslokaler i Bryssel till frfogande (4) fr tre av Europeiska unionens srskilda representanter.
As administrative expenditure, the costs of these secondments and offices are financed from part A of the budget. 
Kostnaderna fr utlning av denna personal och dessa kontor finansieras som administrativa utgifter genom del A i budgeten.
Consequently some salaries and logistical support were regarded as administrative and some other, similar, costs as operating expenditure (5). 
Fljaktligen betraktades vissa lner och logistikstd som administrativa utgifter medan andra liknande kostnader betraktades som driftsutgifter (5).
Nevertheless, some improvement has occurred. 
Vissa frbttringar har dock skett.
Since 1999 the financial statements (6) accompanying draft Council decisions mention usually as a тp.m.у and/or as a description of the contributions in kind from the Commission and from the Council, whereas previously no information about Community contributions in kind was given. 
Sedan 1999 innehller de finansieringsversikter (6) som tfljer utkast till rdsbeslut vanligen ett Óp.m.Ó och/eller en beskrivning av bidragen in natura frn kommissionen och frn rdet, medan tidigare ingen information om gemenskapens bidrag in natura lmnades.
Secondments of personnel by Member States were usually included in the financial statements as тp.m.у items, but since 1999 more specific information has been given for a number of actions. 
Medlemsstaternas utlning av personal inkluderades vanligen i finansieringsversikterna som Óp.m.Ó-poster, men sedan 1999 har mer utfrlig information lmnats fr ett antal tgrder.
The nature and financial importance of contributions in kind has not been presented in the financial reports produced on the CFSP actions. 
Arten och den ekonomiska betydelsen av bidragen in natura har inte redovisats i de ekonomiska rapporter som upprttas avseende GUSP-tgrderna.
Apart from the contributions in kind, the operational expenditure was shared with a number of non-member States in the case of the High Representativeуs mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina. 
Frutom bidragen in natura delades driftsutgifterna i frga om den hge representantens resor till Bosnien och Hercegovina med ett antal icke-medlemsstater.
This action started at the beginning of the year 1996 and is still continuing. 
Denna tgrd inleddes i brjan av r 1996 och pgr fortfarande.
The costs were allocated to the different donors on the basis of a key introduced in 1996. 
Kostnaderna frdelades p olika givare enligt en frdelningsnyckel som infrdes r 1996.
However, no formal agreement exists between the different donors on the respective 4 () On the basis of Article 3(4) of JA 96/676/CFSP (EU special envoy for the Middle East peace process) and of Article 4(4) of JA 96/250/CFSP (Special envoy for the African Great Lakes region), logistic support could have been given only тin the regionу. 
Inga formella avtal finns dock mellan de olika givarna om de respektive andelarna. Vid den aktuella tidpunkten uppgick EG:s andel till 4 () Enligt artikel 3.4 i gemensam tgrd 96/676/GUSP (ett srskilt EU-sndebud fr fredsprocessen i Mellanstern) och artikel 4.4 i gemensam tgrd 96/250/GUSP (ett srskilt sndebud fr omrdet kringdeafrikanskastorasjarna)kundelogistikstdendasthagivits Ói omrdetÓ.
The new decisions (JA 2000/794/CFSP, Article 4(6) and Council Decision 1999/423/CFSP, 5 Article 2(3)) have the respective formulations. () In 2001, all costs are paid from part A of the general budget of the European Union, because the appropriations for EUSRs have been 6 transferred from B8 to A-1 1 1 3. () A financial statement mentions, inter alia, the budget line concerned, the legal basis of the action, objectives and duration of the action, donors of the action and budget of the action. 
De nya besluten (gemensam tgrd 2000/794/GUSP, arti-kel4.6,ochrdetsbeslut99/423/GUSP,artikel2.3)innehllermot- 5 svarande formuleringar. () r 2001 betalades samtliga kostnader genom del A i Europeiska unionens budget, eftersom anslagen fr Europeiska unionens srskilda 6 representanter hade frts ver frn B8 till A-1 1 1 3. () En finansieringsversikt anger bland annat den berrda budgetposten, den rttsliga grunden fr tgrden, tgrdens syfte och varaktighet, givare avseende tgrden och dess budget.
30.11.2001 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 338/11 shares.Atthetime,theCommunityуssharewas50,6%.However, 2,4 % of the budgets was not allocated to any donor. 
30.11.2001 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 338/11 50,6 %.
In May 1999, Coreper accepted the increase of the EUуs share to 53 % on request of the High Representative, but only from 1999 onwards. 
I maj 1999 godtog Coreper p begran av den hge representanten en kning av EU:s andel till 53 %, men frst frn och med r 1999.
The Community did not accept that this higher share should also be adopted for expenditure in the years 1996 to 1998. 
Gemenskapen godtog inte att denna hgre andel ven skulle tillmpas avseende utgifterna under ren 1996Đ1998.
The OHR financing shortfall is further increased by the fact that from the beginning a number of countries paid their share only partly or not at all. 
Underskottet i finansieringen av den hge representantens kansli kade ytterligare p grund av att en rad lnder frn brjan endast delvis eller inte alls betalade sin andel.
The financial report of the OHR as at 31 December 1999 shows that the outstanding amounts are in the order of 4,7 million euro (1) of which 2,6 million euro stems from тbad payersу. 
Den ekonomiska rapporten frn den hge representantens kansli per den 31 december 1999 visar att de utestende beloppen uppgr till omkring 4,7 miljoner euro (1) varav 2,6 miljoner euro kan tillskrivas Ódliga betalareÓ.
When deciding on the European Unionуs 10 Mio ECU participation in the implementing structures of the Bosnia and Herzegovina peace agreement on 20 December 1995, the Commission also decided to provide additional funds of 2 130 000 ECU for infrastructure and running expenses (2) directly paid by the Commission. 
Nr kommissionen den 20 december 1995 beslutade om EU:s deltagande med 10 miljoner ecu i strukturerna fr genomfrande av fredsavtalet fr Bosnien och Hercegovina, beslutade den ocks att tillhandahlla ytterligare medel uppgende till 2 130 000 ecu fr infrastruktur och administrativa utgifter (2) som betalades direkt av kommissionen.
For that reason it was not shared with the other donors. 
Av det sklet delades det inte med vriga givare.
So far, the Commission has not checked whether its contributions exceed its authorised share of eligible expenditure (50,6 % for 1996 to 1998 and 53 % from 1999 onwards) (see paragraph 37). 
Hittills har kommissionen inte kontrollerat om dess bidrag verskrider dess andel av de stdberttigande utgifterna (50,6 % avseende ren 1996Đ1998 och 53 % frn och med r 1999) (se punkt 37).
The Commission financed the OHR on the basis of expenditure forecasts. 
Kommissionen finansierade den hge representantens kansli p grundval av utgiftsprognoser.
The OHR reports annually on its expenditure to the Commission. 
Den hge representantens kansli rapporterar varje r om sina utgifter till kommissionen.
In 2000 the Commission recovered 1,2 million euro of the contribution made in 1999. 
Under 2000 terkrvde kommissionen 1,2 miljoner euro av de bidrag som lmnades 1999.
However, the OHRуs reporting of its expenditure includes items which are not real cash expenditure and therefore not eligible. 
I utgiftsrapporten frn den hge representantens kansli ingr emellertid poster som inte r verkliga kontantutgifter och drfr inte stdberttigande.
Notably it includes тprovisions for unpaid donationsу, тdepreciationу and тlosses on disposal of property, plants and equipmentу. 
Srskilt innehller den reserver fr obetalda donationer, nedskrivningar och frluster avseende fastigheter, anlggningar och utrustning.
In 1996 to 1999 the total amount of provisions for unpaid donations was around 4,7 million euro and the depreciation (on assets already financed by the EU) was around 5,5 million euro. 
Under 1996Đ1999 uppgick det totala beloppet fr reserver fr obetalda donationer till 4,7 miljoner euro och nedskrivningarna (p tillgngar som redan finansierats av EU) till omkring 5,5 miljoner euro.
As a result for the years 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 the Commission paid nearly 4 million euro more than its share. 
Som en fljd hrav betalade kommissionen fr ren 1996, 1997, 1998 och 1999 nstan 4 miljoner euro mer n sin andel.
Another case was the Royaumont Process which included the financing of 11 projects. 
Ett annat fall var Royaumontprocessen, som omfattade finansieringen av elva projekt.
According to the financial statement, the share financed by the Community varied between 30,5 % and 100 % and averaged 79 %. 
Enligt finansieringsversikten varierade den andel som finansierades av gemenskapen frn 30,5 % till 100 % och var i genomsnitt 79 %.
The other donors were not mentioned in preparatory documents, nor were reasons given for the different levels of Community financing. 
De vriga givarna nmndes inte i de frberedande dokumenten, och inte heller angavs skl fr de olika niverna av gemenskapsfinansiering.
1 () From this amount about 1 900 000 euro is allocated to the EU. 
(1) Av detta belopp har omkring 1 900 000 euro frdelats till EU.
This audit shows, however, that the EU had paid even more than its due 2 share. () The share of the Commission of the budgeted costs of the OHR was either 55,4 % or 61,4 % depending on whether the OHR budget included the 2,13 Mio ECU. 
Denna granskning visar dock att EU hade betalat till och med mer n sin 2 vederbrliga andel. () Kommissionens andel av de budgeterade kostnaderna fr den hge representantens kansli var antingen 55,4 % eller 61,4 % beroende p om budgeten fr den hge representantens kansli omfattade de 2,13 miljonerna ecu.
During the audit, the real costs to the Commission from this contribution have not been clarified. 
Under granskningen har kommissionens verkliga kostnader fr detta bidrag inte klarlagts.
Availabilityofresources 41. 
Disponibla medel 41.
The Financial Regulation requires financial resources to be available when a decision to finance an action is taken. 
I budgetfrordningen freskrivs att medel skall finnas disponibla nr ett beslut om att finansiera en tgrd fattas.
The Commission submitted a declaration to Coreper on 20 October 1998 in which тThe Commission notes that two joint actions on the observation of the Nigerian elections and on the forensic experts mission to Kosovo will be adopted on the basis of the commitment appropriations of the 1999 budget. 
Kommissionen avgav den 20 oktober 1998 en frklaring till Coreper, dr den bland annat sade fljande: Kommissionen noterar att tv gemensamma tgrder avseende vervakning av valet i Nigeria och ett kriminaltekniskt expertuppdrag i Kosovo kommer att antas p grundval av tagandebemyndiganden i 1999 rs budget.
Whilst recognising the urgency and importance of both actions and the fact that they will only enter into force in 1999, the Commission recalls the previous agreement that this improper method would no longer be used and points out that it will lead to a situation in which a significant percentage of subsection B8 of the Community budget will be unavailable as of the beginning of that year on account of past decisionsу. 
Samtidigt som kommissionen medger att bda tgrderna r brdskandeochviktigaochattdeintekommeratttrdaikraft frrn r 1999, erinrar den om den tidigare verenskommelsen om att denna olmpliga metod inte lngre skulle anvndas och ppekar att metoden kommer att leda till en situation dr en vsentlig procentandel av kapitel B8 i gemenskapens budget p grund av tidigare beslut inte kommer att vara tillgnglig i brjan av det ret.
Several commitments, before or after the Commissionуs declaration, were made in a different budget year from the one in which the Council decision was adopted. 
Flera taganden gjordes, fre eller efter kommissionens frklaring, avseende ett annat budgetr n det d rdets beslut fattades.
In 2000, about 40 % of the commitment appropriations used reflected decisions taken by the Council before 31 December 1999 (3). 
Under r 2000 speglade omkring 40 % av tagandebemyndigandena beslut som rdet fattat fre den 31 december 1999 (3).
In 1999, the equivalent percentage was 19 % (4). 
Under r 1999 var motsvarande andel 19 % (4).
Also at the Coreper meeting on 20 October 1998, the Commission repeated its opposition to the incorrect budget technique again used in another joint action (5), which consisted in charging some of the commitments required to a future budget. 
Vid Corepers mte den 20 oktober 1998 upprepade kommissionen ocks sin invndning mot den felaktiga budgetteknik som anvndes vid en annan gemensam tgrd (5) och som innebar att en framtida budget belastades med vissa av de ndvndiga tagandena.
It noted with satisfaction, however, the Member Statesу unanimous agreement that the technique was used on an exceptional basis and therefore all the commitments required for CFSP actions would be charged in their entirety to the budget for the year of the decision. 
Kommissionen noterade dock med tillfredsstllelse medlemsstaternas enhlliga verenskommelse om att tekniken tillmpades undantagsvis och att drfr samtliga taganden som krvs fr GUSP-tgrderna i sin helhet skulle belasta budgeten fr det r d beslutet fattades.
Since that statement, so-called тsplit commitmentsу have not been used again. 
Efter detta uttalande har s kallade delade taganden inte anvnts fler gnger.
In the years 1997 to 1999, the total amount of Council decisions in respect of the CFSP operations came to 117 million euro (6), which exceeded the appropriations available by 20,6 million euro. 
Under ren 1997Đ1999 uppgick det totala beloppet fr rdsbeslut avseende GUSP-tgrder till 117 miljoner euro (6) vilket verskred de tillgngliga anslagen med 20,6 miljoner euro.
The Commission decisions exceeded the appropriations available by 7,7 million euro. 
Kommissionens beslut verskred tillgngliga anslag med 7,7 miljoner euro.
The Council decisions and the Commission decisions should be made within the limits of commitment appropriations of the relevant year in the general budget of the European Union. 
Rdets och kommissionens beslut br fattas inom grnserna fr tagandendebemyndigandena fr det aktuella ret i Europeiska unionens allmnna budget.
Delays in launching the actions 44. 
Frseningar i frga om inledandet av tgrderna 44.
The time lapse between Council decision and first payment by the Commission provides an indicator of the speed at which (3) Cover note of the Council, 8290/2000 CFSP 214. 
Den tid som faktiskt frflyter mellan rdets beslut och den frsta betalningen frn kommissionen ger en indikation p hur 3 () Rdets fljenot nr 8290/00 PESC 214.
According to Sincom, 18 600 166 euro was committed due to the Council decision made in 1999. 
Enligt Sincom hade 18 600 166 euro tagits i ansprk p grund av beslut som rdet fattade r 1999.
The commitment appropriation was 47 million euro 4 for the year 2000. () Forwarding note of the Council, 10814/1999 CFSP 269. 
4 tagandebemyndigandena uppgick fr r 2000 till 47 miljoner euro. () Rdets fljenot nr 10814/99 PESC 269.
Decision 98/623/CFSP (75 000 euro) is missing from the list in the abovemen-5 tioned note. 
98/623/GUSP (75 000 euro) 5 saknas p listan i ovan nmnda not.
(6) Decision 98/608/CFSP, Special envoy for Middle East peace process. () See Annex 4. 
(6) 98/608/GUSP, srskilt sndebud fr fredsprocessen i Mellanstern. () Se bilaga 4.
C 338/12 EN Official Journal of the European Communities 30.11.2001 actions are implemented. 
C 338/12 SV Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning 30.11.2001 snabbt tgrderna genomfrdes.
This time lapse is often considerable, despite the apparent urgent nature of many interventions. 
Ofta frflyter en avsevrd tid, trots att mnga interventioner r av synbart brdskande art.
During the period 1997 to 1999, the average time from the Council decision to the first payment was 173 days(1) (see Annex 4). 
Under perioden 1997Đ1999 var den genomsnittliga tiden frn rdets beslut till den frsta betalningen 173 dagar (1) (se bilaga 4).
By not using the reserve since 1997 (see paragraph 34), this time span was reduced in 1998. 
Genom att reserven inte anvndes efter r 1997 (se punkt 34) minskade tidsrymden under r 1998.
However, in 1999 it was higher than in 1997. 
Under r 1999 var den dock lngre n under r 1997.
The delay between the Council decision and first payment varies considerably from action to action: in one case, the time from the Council decision to the first payment was only four days; in one other case 18 days and in two other cases less than 50 days; in three cases the delays were between one and two years; for half of the cases, the delay was between 104 and 232 days in 1997, between 61 and 192 days in 1998 and between 128 and 183 days in 1999. 
Den tid som frflt mellan rdets beslut och den frsta betalningen varierar kraftigt frn tgrd till tgrd. I ett fall var tiden frn rdets beslut till den frsta betalningen bara fyra dagar, i ett annat fall 18 dagar och i tv andra fall mindre n 50 dagar.
The time span between the Council decision and the Commission decision was more than 120 days in seven cases out of 40 in the period 1997 to 1999 of which six were related to 1999 Council decisions (see Annex 4). 
Den tid som frflt mellan rdets beslut och kommissionens beslut var mer n 120 dagar i sju fall av 40 under perioden 1997Đ1999, varav sex avsg rdsbeslut frn 1999 (se bilaga 4).
The joint actions and the implementing decisions related to Common Positions are usually taken when the Council considers that there is urgent need for a Community action. 
De gemensamma tgrderna och besluten om genomfrande av gemensamma stndpunkter antas vanligen nr rdet anser att det freligger ett brdskande behov av en gemenskapstgrd.
As the Court pointed out in its Opinion No 1/97, one factor causing delays is an insufficient involvement of the Commission in the preparatory phases of the common measures. 
Som revisionsrtten ppekade i sitt yttrande nr 1/97 r en orsak till drjsmlen kommissionens otillrckliga engagemang i det frberedande stadiet av de gemensamma tgrderna.
A smooth fulfilment of the Council decision is hardly possible if the Commission does not participate in the preparatory work from the beginning. 
Ett smidigt genomfrande av rdets beslut r knappast mjligt om kommissionen inte frn brjan deltar i det frberedande arbetet.
Another cause of delays has been coordination problems or other difficulties within the Commissionуs departments. 
En annan orsak till frseningar har varit samordningsproblem eller andra svrigheter inom kommissionens enheter.
The Commission has stated that the reorganisation of the CFSP tasks within the Commission should avoid repetition of suchcases. 
Kommissionen har frklarat att omorganisationen av GUSP-tgrderna inom kommissionen skallfrhindraattliknandefallupprepas.
Due to the delays, actions often start much later than originally intended. 
P grund av drjsmlen inleds tgrderna ofta mycket senare n vad som ursprungligen avsgs.
Such delays are a threat to the effectiveness of the measures. 
Dessa drjsml utgr ett hot mot tgrdernas effektivitet.
The Commission should pay special attention to cases where there is a high risk of a long delay before any action is likely to take place. 
Kommissionen br srskilt uppmrksamma de fall dr det freligger stor risk fr lnga drjsml innan det r troligt att tgrder kan inledas.