natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Likewise, a memorandum of 3 February 2011 from the two General Managers of Nuclearelectrica and CE Hunedoara, which, like Hidroelectrica, are State-owned, requested the approval of the Ministry of Economy and Trade for the conclusion of a wholesale sale of electricity contract between Nuclearelectrica as a seller and CE Hunedoara as a purchaser.
Avtalen som omfattas av detta beslut utgör inte statligt stöd i den mening som avses i artikel 107.1 i EUF-fördraget.
This transaction needed a derogation from the provisions of Order 445/2009 requiring that any wholesale electricity transaction involving a State-owned enterprise should take place only on OPCOM.
HÄRIGENOM FÖRESKRIVS FÖLJANDE:
This derogation was requested in view of the fact that the electricity acquired would serve ‘the electricity needs of a number of industrial consumers of national importance in 2011’.
Artikel 1
This memorandum was fully endorsed by the Minister of Economy and Trade.
De avtal som ingicks mellan Hidroelectrica och ArcelorMittal, Alpiq RomEnergie, Alpiq RomIndustries, EFT, Electrica, Electromagnetica, Energy Holding, EURO-PEC, Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon och Elsid, samt avtalet med Alro, utgör inte statligt stöd i den mening som avses i artikel 107.1 i fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt.
It follows that there is some indirect evidence that does not allow it to be completely ruled out that the Romanian State would have been involved in concluding, or making major amendments to, Hidroelectrica's contracts with big energy-intensive industrial buyers.
Artikel 2
Moreover, the Commission has concluded that other purchase contracts into which Hidroelectrica entered with two other State-owned companies, Electrocentrale Deva and Termoelectrica, in 2008 and 2009, were imputable to the Romanian State.
Detta beslut riktar sig till Rumänien.
That conclusion was based mainly on direct evidence of the other two State-owned companies having sought approval of the contracts from the Minister responsible also for the State-owned Hidroelectrica as a means of (cross) financing their current operations and that of the State-owned mines which supplied them with coal, for social and other non-commercial reasons [61].
Utfärdat i Bryssel den 12 juni 2015.
However, the considerations that may render plausible (or not exclude the possibility of) the Romanian State's being involved in a number of Hidroelectrica's contracts with big industrial buyers of national importance for the Romanian economy and with other State-owned sellers cannot be extrapolated from in such a way that all Hidroelectrica's commercial contracts and, in particular, those with Elsid, Electrocarbon and electricity traders are considered to be imputable to the Romanian State.
På kommissionens vägnar
Unlike Electrocentrale Deva and Termoelectrica, Elsid, Electrocarbon and the electricity traders were privately-owned and none of them can be held to be a big industrial buyer of national importance for the Romanian economy.
Ledamot av kommissionen
In particular, the evidence available in the investigation does not point at any specific interest or involvement on the part of the Romanian State in prompting Hidroelectrica to conclude or, after Romania's accession, to maintain the contracts with Elsid, Electrocarbon and the electricity traders.
Kommissionens beslut C(2012) 2516 final av den 25 april 2012 rörande fallet SA.33623 (EUT C 189, 29.6.2012, s. 3).
Moreover, as regards Elsid, Electrocarbon and Luxten-Lighting, which were specifically singled out in the previous Section 7.1, several facts make it implausible that the decision to maintain the contracts and amend the prices of the contracts with Luxten-Lighting for 2008-2009 and with Electrocarbon and Elsid for 2007-2010 could be attributed to the Romanian authorities.
Kommissionens beslut C(2012) 2517 final av den 25 april 2012 rörande fallet SA.33624 (EUT C 268, 5.9.2012, s. 21).
In particular, the actual prices under the three contracts were constantly increased each year.
Kommissionens beslut C(2012) 2542 final av den 25 april 2012 rörande fallet SA.33451 (EUT C 395, 20.12.2012, s. 5).
Between 2007 and 2010, the prices charged to Elsid, Electrocarbon and Luxten-Lighting increased by 44,5 %, 44,5 % and 41,4 %, respectively.
Kommissionens beslut C(2012) 2556 final av den 25 april 2012 rörande fallet SA.33581 (EUT C 395, 20.12.2012, s. 34).
Price increases reduce the absolute value of the aid granted.
EUT L 115, 9.5.2008, s. 92.
These contract changes which reduce the putative amount of the alleged State aid, were always triggered by, and for the benefit of, Hidroelectrica.
Ärende SA.33623 (EUT C 189, 29.6.2012, s. 3), ärende SA.33624 (EUT C 268, 5.9.2012, s. 21), ärende SA.33451 (EUT C 395, 20.12.2012, s. 5) och ärende SA.33581 (EUT C 395, 20.12.2012, s. 34).
A strategy aimed at reducing the amount of aid granted to the beneficiaries seems to contradict the purpose of granting aid or, at least, to be too sophisticated to be plausible.
Inbegripet de preliminära synpunkter som Luxten-Lighting och Euro-Pec inkom med innan offentliggörandet av uppmaningen att inkomma med synpunkter på beslutet att inleda förfarandet: Luxten-Lighting den 14 augusti 2012 samt Euro-Pec den 13 augusti 2012.
Moreover, contrary to Alro and ArcelorMittal, Elsid, Electrocarbon and Luxten-Lighting cannot be deemed to be industrial consumers of national importance: by way of illustration, their annual consumption purchases from Hidroelectrica amounted to less than one tenth of those of Alro (Annex I).
Alla ledamöter av Hidroelectricas styrelse, med undantag för Hidroelectricas VD och företrädaren för Fondul Proprietatea (2010), innehade samtidigt andra funktioner vid olika ministerier och utsågs genom förordnanden från ministeriet för ekonomi och handel, enligt följande: i) under perioden 2005–2006: den personliga rådgivaren i sekretariatet för ministern för ekonomi och handel, direktören med ansvar för sekretariatet vid ministeriet för små och medelstora företag, den personliga rådgivaren i budgetministerns sekretariat och den personliga rådgivaren i regeringens generalsekretariat var ledamöter av Hidroelectricas styrelse, ii) under perioden 2007–2008 – situationen okänd, iii) under 2009: statssekreteraren i ministeriet för ekonomi och handel var också ordförande för Hidroelectricas styrelse (2009), medan en annan statssekreterare i budgetministeriet och två generaldirektörer i ministeriet för ekonomi och handel även var ledamöter av Hidroelectricas styrelse, iv) under 2010: tre personliga rådgivare vid ministeriet för ekonomi och handel, en statssekreterare vid finansministeriet och en generaldirektör vid ministeriet för ekonomi och handel var ledamöter av Hidroelectricas styrelse.
It is therefore unlikely that decisions reducing the amount of aid by considerably increasing the contract prices can be imputed not to a commercial decision of Hidroelectrica but to a decision of the Romanian State aimed at providing aid to the alleged beneficiaries.
Se Internationella energiorganet (International Energy Agency): ”Projected costs of generating electricity”, 2010, avsnitt 4.2 ”Country by country data on electricity generating costs” s. 89.
The fact that it is unlikely that the State would be involved in subtly reducing the amount of aid is also apparent with respect to the contracts with Electrocarbon and Elsid.
Beslut nr 22456/3/2012 av den 26 juni 2012 från tribunalen i Bukarest.
In particular, it is implausible that Hidroelectrica was acting under instructions from the State when requesting price increases above the contract prices in 2010, threatening to discontinue the electricity supply and arguing the matter in court (recital 22), for the requested price increases had the effect of reducing the putative amount of aid, and discontinued supplies could have jeopardised the productive activities of the buyers.
Beslut nr 6482 av den 26 juni 2013 från tribunalen i Bukarest.
This behaviour of not adhering to a contract price that purportedly provides aid, threatening to interrupt supplies and defending price increases in court is not behaviour typical of a grantor of aid, but is, rather, that of a revenue-maximising company defending its commercial interests and not concerned with following non-commercial goals, possibly under instructions received from the State.
Finns endast på rumänska på http://www.euroinsol.eu/uploads/Raport%2059%20Hidro%20v11.pdf
As regards Luxten-Lighting, there is no obvious reason of public policy, such as low end-user prices, behind sales to a trader which can only sell retail at higher prices than if Hidroelectrica had sold the same electricity retail on its own.
Electrica ingick två kortfristiga avtal med Hidroelectrica.
For instance, before being supplied retail by Hidroelectrica as from 2005, Alro purchased electricity from a trader, Energy Holding, that bought electricity wholesale from Hidroelectrica.
Avtal med AlpiqRomEnergie, två avtal med Electrica samt två avtal med ArcelorMittal.
It was rational behaviour for Alro to be supplied directly by Hidroelectrica, thus saving a trading margin, if its supplier was not adding value to Hidroelectrica's wholesale supply.
Fem avtal med elåterförsäljare (Alpiq RomIndustries, Electromagnetica, Energy Holding, Euro-Pec samt Luxten-Lighting).
In the same vein, it is rather implausible that the Romanian State should have prompted Hidroelectrica to maintain the contract with Luxten-Lighting in 2008 and 2009, for, if Luxten-Lighting did not add value to its retail sales to industrial users or other buyers, the latter would have obtained lower prices by contracting directly with Hidroelectrica.
Avtal med EFT (elåterförsäljare) och Alro.
Furthermore, Luxten-Lighting unilaterally terminated its contract with Hidroelectrica in November 2011, before the Commission opened proceedings; this behaviour is not consistent with that of a beneficiary of State aid.
Avtal med Electrocarbon, Elsid och Alpiq RomEnergie (elåterförsäljare).
On the basis of all the above considerations, it is not established that the contracts with Luxten-Lighting for 2008-2009 and for Electrocarbon and Elsid for 2007-2010 are imputable to Romania.
Avtal med Electrocarbon och Elsid.
As the essential element of imputability to Romania for the existence of State aid is not present in the three contracts with Luxten-Lighting for 2008-2009 and with Electrocarbon and Elsid for 2007-2010, it is not necessary to analyse whether the other cumulative conditions for the application of this provision, such as the potential effect on competition and trade between Member States, are met.
Två avtal med ArcelorMittal.
In the light of the above, the three contracts under scrutiny, with Luxten-Lighting for 2008-2009 and with Electrocarbon and Elsid for 2007-2010, do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.
Två avtal med Electrica.
CONCLUSION
Avtalet med Luxten-Lighting (elåterförsäljare) sades upp av Luxten-Lighting genom ett meddelande av den 15 november 2011, med verkan från och med den 1 januari 2012.
The contracts covered by the present Decision do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU,
Avtalen med Electrocarbon och Elsid löpte ut den 13 mars 2013 och avtalet med Electromagnetica (elåterförsäljare) löpte ut den 30 april 2014.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
I tillägg 1 till avtalet med Electrocarbon angavs ett på förhand fastställt pris (till en fast summa – samma pris) fram till den 28 februari 2008, och i tillägg 2 till avtalet med Elsid angavs ett på förhand fastställt pris fram till den 31 december 2007.
Article 1
Den 1 juli 2004 enades parterna om en tabell utifrån vilken ett årligt fast pris fastställdes i förväg under perioden 2006–2013 (t.ex.: tillägg 4 till avtalet med Electrocarbon och tillägg 5 till avtalet med Elsid).
The contracts concluded between Hidroelectrica and ArcelorMittal, Alpiq RomEnergie, Alpiq RomIndustries, EFT, Electrica, Electromagnetica, Energy Holding, Euro-Pec, Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon and Elsid, and the contract with Alro, do not constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Priserna ändrades sedan den 1 januari 2005 då de i förväg fastställdes till en fast summa fram till den 31 december 2007 för Elsid och fram till den 28 februari 2008 för Electrocarbon.
Article 2
Från och med 2006 justerades avtalspriserna årligen för Electrocarbon och Elsid.
This Decision is addressed to Romania.
Förstainstansrätt: Tribunalen i Olt – ärende 2800/104/2010 (Electrocarbon) samt tribunalen i Dambovita – ärende 4102/120/2010 (Elsid).
Done at Brussels, 12 June 2015.
Artikel 10.2 i alla tre avtalen.
For the Commission
Artikel 10.1 i alla tre avtalen.
Member of the Commission
Artikel 55 punkt 1 i lag nr 123/2012 om el och gas, åter ändrad genom lag nr 127/2014.
Commission Decision C(2012) 2516 final of 25 April 2012 concerning case SA.33623 (OJ C 189, 29.6.2012, p. 3).
Rapporten från KPMG, bilaga 3 till Energy Holdings memorandum av den 27 februari 2012, s. 8.
Commission Decision C(2012) 2517 final of 25 April 2012 concerning case SA.33624 (OJ C 268, 5.9.2012, p. 21).
Källa: Hidroelectricas årsrapport, förvaltarens rapport från 2010, KPMG:s analys.
Commission Decision C(2012) 2542 final of 25 April 2012 concerning case SA.33451 (OJ C 395, 20.12.2012, p. 5).
Rapporten från KPMG, bilaga 3 till Energy Holdings memorandum av den 27 februari 2012, s. 21.
Commission Decision C(2012) 2556 final of 25 April 2012 concerning case SA.33581 (OJ C 395, 20.12.2012, p. 34).
Källa: ANRE.
OJ L 115, 9.5.2008, p. 92.
Affärshemlighet.
Case SA.33623 (OJ C 189, 29.6.2012, p. 3); case SA.33624 (OJ C 268, 5.9.2012, p. 21); case SA.33451 (OJ C 395, 20.12.2012, p. 5) and case SA.33581 (OJ C 395, 20.12.2012, p. 34).
Kommissionens beslut av den 5 mars 2014, om ett förfarande enligt artikel 102 i EUF-fördraget för att utkräva böter enligt artikel 7 i förordning (EG) nr 1/2003 i fallet AT.39984 – OPCOM/rumänska elbörsen.
Including the preliminary observations submitted by Luxten-Lighting and Euro-Pec before publication of the invitation to provide comments on the opening decision: Luxten-Lighting on 14 August 2012 and Euro-Pec on 13 August 2012.
Förteckningen över kunder står att finna i bilaga II, tabell 1.
All members of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors except the General Director of Hidroelectrica and the representative of Fondul Proprietatea (2010), cumulated other functions in various Ministries and were appointed through Orders issued by the Ministry of Economy and Trade, as follows: (i) in 2005-2006: the personal adviser in the cabinet of the Minister of Economy and Trade; the director of cabinet of the Minister for Small and Medium Enterprises; the personal adviser in the cabinet of the Minister in the Ministry of Public Finance and the personal adviser in the General Secretariat of the Government were members of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors; (ii) in 2007-2008 — situation unknown; (iii) in 2009: the State Secretary in the Ministry of Economy and Trade was also the President of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors (2009), while another State Secretary in the Ministry of Public Finance and two general directors in the Ministry of Economy and Trade were also members of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors; (iv) in 2010: three personal advisers in the Ministry of Economy and Trade, a State Secretary in the Ministry of Finance and a General Director in the Ministry of Economy and Trade were members of Hidroelectrica's Board of Directors.
Vissa elåterförsäljare (dvs. Alpiq RomIndustries, EFT, Alro Electrocarbon och Elsid).
See International Energy Agency: ‘Projected costs of generating electricity’ 2010 edition, Section 4.2 ‘Country by country data on electricity generating costs’, p. 89.
En elåterförsäljare (EFT) och Alro.
Decision of Tribunal of Bucharest No 22456/3/2012 dated 26 June 2012.
Gäller enbart i fallet Alro.
Decision of Tribunal of Bucharest No 6482 dated 26 June 2013.
Rådets förordning (EG) nr 659/1999 av den 22 mars 1999 om tillämpningsföreskrifter för artikel 108 i fördraget om Europeiska unionens funktionssätt (EGT L 83, 27.3.1999, s. 1).
Available in Romanian only at http://www.euroinsol.eu/uploads/Raport%2059%20Hidro%20v11.pdf
Till skillnad från i fallen om ungerska fördelaktiga eltariffer – dom av den 13 februari 2012 i målen T-80/06 och T-182/09, Budapesti Erőmű/kommissionen (ECLI:EU:T:2012:65).
Electrica concluded two short-term contracts with Hidroelectrica.
För ytterligare information, se ANRE:s årliga övervakningsrapport för 2007 och efterföljande år.
Contract with Alpiq RomEnergie; two contracts with Electrica; and two contracts with ArcelorMittal.
Alpiq RomIndustries och Alpiq RomEnergie.
Five contracts with electricity traders (Alpiq RomIndustries; Electromagnetica; Energy Holding; Euro-Pec; Luxten-Lighting).
Dom av den 16 maj 2002, Republiken Frankrike/kommissionen (Stardust Marine), mål C-482/99, ECLI: EU:C:2002:294.
Contracts with EFT (electricity trader) and Alro.
Alpiq RomEnergie, Alpiq RomIndustrie, Electromagnetica, Energy Holding, Electrocarbon och Elsid, ArcelorMittal samt Alro.
Contracts with Electrocarbon and Elsid.
EFT, Electromagnetica, Luxten-Lighting och Energy Holding.
Two contracts with Arcelor Mittal.
EFT, Electromagnetica, Luxten-Lighting och Alro.
Two contracts with Electrica.
EFT, Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon och Elsid.
The contract with Luxten-Lighting (electricity trader) was terminated by Luxten-Lighting by notice dated 15 November 2011, with effect from 1 January 2012.
Alpiq RomEnergy och Alpiq RomIndustries.
Contracts with Electrocarbon and Elsid expired on 13 March 2013 and the contract with Electromagnetica (electricity trader) expired on 30 April 2014.
Tribunalens dom av den 13 februari 2012, Budapesti Erömü/kommissionen, förenade målen T-80/06 och T-182/09, ECLI:EU:T:2012:65, punkterna 50 till 62.
Addendum 1 to the contract with Electrocarbon provided for a pre-set price (at a fixed amount — the same price) until 28 February 2008; Addendum 2 to the contract with Elsid provided for a pre-set price until 31 December 2007.
EUT L 157, 21.6.2005, s. 96.
On 1 July 2004 the parties agreed on a table pre-setting a per year fixed price for the period 2006-2013 (i.e.: Addendum 4 to the contract with Electrocarbon and Addendum 5 to the contract with Elsid).
Se rättspraxisen i fotnot 39, punkterna 69–89.
The prices were subsequently modified on 1 January 2005 with prices pre-set at a fixed amount until 31 December 2007 for Elsid and until 28 February 2008, for Electrocarbon.
Kommissionens beslut 2014/456/EU av den 4 februari 2014 om statligt stöd nr SA.21817 (C 3/07) (f.d.
As of 2006 the contract prices were readjusted yearly for Electrocarbon and Elsid.
NN 66/06) som Spanien har genomfört Eltariffer i Spanien: konsumenter (EUT L 205, 12.7.2014, s. 25), skäl 113–120.
Court of first instance: Olt Tribunal — File 2800/104/2010 (Electrocarbon) and Dambovita Tribunal — File 4102/120/2010 (Elsid).
Tribunalens dom av den 13 februari 2012, Budapesti Erömü/kommissionen, förenade målen T-80/06 och T-182/09, ECLI:EU:T:2012:65, punkterna 104–114.
Article 10(2) of each of the three contracts.
Hidroelectrica auktionerade ut ArcelorMittals anbud den 23 december 2009, medan Energy Holding drog tillbaka sitt anbud den 22 december 2009.
Article 10(1) of each of the three contracts.
Arelcos och Petropeds parallella anbud drogs tillbaka den 20 respektive den 30 december 2010.
Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Electricity and Gas Law No 123/2012 as further amended by Law No 127/2014.
Se bilaga I till detta beslut.
KPMG Report, Annex 3 to Memorandum of Energy Holdings dated 27 February 2012, p. 8, source: Hidroelectrica's Annual Reports, 2010 Administrator's Report, KPMG Analysis.
Dom av den 16 maj 2002, Frankrike/kommissionen (Stardust Marine), C-482/99, ECLI:EU:C:2002:294, punkterna 51–58.
KPMG report, Annex 3 to the Memorandum of Energy Holdings dated 27 February 2012, p. 21, source: ANRE.
Se fotnot 59.
Business secret.
Kommissionens beslut (EU) 2015/1877 av den 20 april 2015 om de tariffer som tillämpas av S.C.
Commission Decision of 5 March 2014, in application of Article 102 TFEU imposing fines pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in case AT.39 984 ‘Romanian Power Exchange/OPCOM’.
Hidroelectrica SA of Romania i avtal med S.C.
The dataset used for benchmarking included 114 observations, covering the period 2007-2010.
Termoelectrica SA och S.C.
The dataset included the following information: the identity of the seller and the buyer, the type of contract, the date of entry into force and the expiry date, as well as the quantity, profile of supply and the weighted average price for each year from 2007 to 2013.
Electrocentrale Deva SA – SA.33475 (12/C) (EUT L 275, 20.10.2015, s.
The list of buyers is provided in Annex II, Table 1.
46), skälen 96–100.
Certain electricity traders (i.e.: Alpiq RomIndustries, EFT, Alro Electrocarbon and Elsid).
BILAGA I
One electricity trader (EFT) and Alro.
ÖVERBLICK AV AVTALEN
Only in the case of Alro.
ELÅTERFÖRSÄLJARNA
Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1).
Datum för undertecknande och avtalsperiod (inledande period/efter förlängning av period)
Contrary to the Hungarian preferential electricity tariffs cases — T-80/06 and T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü v Commission (ECLI:EU:T:2012:65).
Datum för uppsägningen
For further reference please see the ANRE Annual Monitoring Report for 2007 and for the following years.
Kvantitet
Alpiq RomIndustries and Alpiq RomEnergie.
Pris (RON/MWh)
Case C-482/99 French Republic v Commission (Stardust Marine) [2002] ECR I-4397.
Inledande period: 5 år
Alpiq RomEnergie, Alpiq RomIndustrie, Electromagnetica, Energy Holding, Electrocarbon and Elsid, ArcelorMittal and Alro.
Förlängning (2009): med ytterligare 5 år (fram till 2018)
Energy Holding, an electricity trader.
20 juli 2012
EFT, Electromagnetica, Luxten-Lighting and Energy Holding.
Inledande period: 10 år
EFT, Electromagnetica, Luxten-Lighting and Alro.
Förlängning (2009): med ytterligare 5 år (fram till slutet av 2019)
EFT, Luxten-Lighting, Electrocarbon and Elsid.
Inledande kvantitet: 1 GWh
Alpiq RomEnergy and Alpiq RomIndustries.
25 mars 2004
Joined Cases T-80/06 and T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü v European Commission, paragraphs 50 to 62.
Inledande period: 7 år
OJ L 157, 21.6.2005, p. 96.
Förlängning (2010): med ytterligare 5 år (fram till slutet av 2015)
Commission Decision 2014/456/EU of 4 February 2014 on State aid No SA.21817 (C 3/07) (ex NN 66/06 implemented by Spain, Spanish Electricity Tariffs: consumers (OJ L 205, 12.7.2014, p. 25), recitals 113 to 120.
Inledande kvantitet (2006): […] GWh
Joined Cases T-80/06 and T-182/09 Budapesti Erömü v European Commission, paragraphs 104-114.
Avtal 111: 17 augusti 2010
The ArcelorMittal offer was auctioned by Hidroelectrica on 23 December 2009, while Energy Holding withdrew its offer on 22 December 2009.
Avtal 112: 14 september 2010
Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1877 of 20 April 2015 on tariffs charged by S.C.
[…] GWh fr.o.m. oktober t.o.m. december 2010
Hidroelectrica SA of Romania to S.C.
Inledande kvantitet: […] GWh
Termoelectrica SA and S.C.
14 januari 2004
Electrocentrale Deva SA — SA.33475 (12/C) (OJ L 275, 20.10.2015, p. 46), recitals 96-100.
24 juli 2012
ANNEX I
Inledande kvantitet: 3692 GWh
OVERVIEW OF THE CONTRACTS
1:a halvåret 2008: […] GWh
ELECTRICITY TRADERS
2:a halvåret 2008: […] GWh
Date of signature and contract period (initial period/after extension of period)
3 mars 2004
Quantity
2 mars 2004
Price (RON/MWh)
ELEKTRODPRODUCENTERNA
3 April 2008
28 mars 2003
Initial period: 5 years
Förlängning (2004): med ytterligare 5 år (fram till den 31 mars 2013)
Prolongation (2009): by 5 additional years (until 2018)
31 mars 2013
2008: […] GWh
Inledande kvantitet: 280 GWh
2009: […] GWh
Datum för undertecknande och avtalsperiod (inledande period/efter förlängning av period [om tillämpligt])
Initial period: 10 years
Period: 1 år
Prolongation (2009): by 5 additional years (until end of 2019)
6 januari 2012
Initial quantity: 1 GWh
BILAGA II
25 March 2004
BEDÖMNING AV PÅSTÅDDA EKONOMISKA FÖRDELAR – EKONOMETRISK ANALYS