natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The section had adopted its opinion by 60 votes to 3 with 3 abstentions on 25 April 2013.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 25. aprila 2013 s 60 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion by 68 votes to 8 with 4 abstentions on 7 October 2011.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 7. oktobra 2011 z 68 glasovi za, 8 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion by 75 votes to 1 with 10 abstentions on 20 December 2011.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 20. decembra 2011 s 75 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion by a majority of 54 votes to five with three abstentions on 5 April 2011.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 5. aprila 2011 s 54 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion by a majority of 55 votes to two with eight abstentions on 5 April 2011.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 5. aprila 2011 s 55 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion by a majority of 59 votes and one abstention on 19 December 2011.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 19. decembra 2011 z 59 glasovi za, z nobenim glasom proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The section had adopted its opinion by a majority of 74 votes to one with eight abstentions on 30 March 2010.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela z večino glasov 30. marca 2010, in sicer s 74 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 8 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion on 10 May 2012 by 40 votes to 1, with 2 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 10. maja 2012 s 40 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The section had adopted its opinion on 10 November 2011 by 74 votes to 2 with 6 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela z večino glasov 10. novembra 2011, in sicer s 74 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion on 12 October 2009 with 63 votes in favour, 1 against and 1 abstention.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 12. oktobra 2009 s 63 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The section had adopted its opinion on 17 December 2010 by 53 votes to seven.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 17. decembra 2010 s 53 glasovi za in 7 glasovi proti.
The section had adopted its opinion on 17 November 2009, by 49 votes to 2.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 17. novembra 2009 z 49 glasovi za in 2 glasovoma proti.
The section had adopted its opinion on 2 September 2009 by 37 votes for, one against and three abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 2. septembra 2009 s 37 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Section had adopted its opinion on 26 November 2012 by 62 votes to 9 and 7 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 26. novembra 2012 z 62 glasovi za, 9 glasovi proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion on 27 March 2013 by 64 votes to 1, with 0 abstentions; 3 amendments had been tabled by the rapporteur himself.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 27. marca 2013 s 64 glasovi za in 1 glasom proti.
The section had adopted its opinion on 3 April 2013 by 71 votes to 8, with 3 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 3. aprila 2013 z 71 glasovi za, 8 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion on 30 August 2011 by 63 votes to seven with 12 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 30. avgusta 2011 s 63 glasovi za, 7 glasovi proti in 12 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion on 31 January 2006 by 49 votes to 5, with 7 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 31. januarja 2006 z 49 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion on 8 March 2012 by 60 votes to 5 with five abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 8. marca 2012 s 60 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion on 8 March 2012 by 63 votes to 28 with 4 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 8. marca 2012 s 63 glasovi za, 28 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion on 8 September 2009 with 59 votes in favour, 3 against and 2 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 8. septembra 2009 z 59 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The section had adopted its opinion on 9 September 2009, by 54 votes to five, with nine abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 9. septembra 2009 s 54 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion with 35 votes for, 2 votes against and 4 abstentions on 6 May 2010.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 6. maja 2010 s 35 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion with 40 votes in favour, three votes against and three abstentions on 9 December 2009.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 9. decembra 2009 s 40 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion with 54 votes in favour, five against and four abstentions on 31 August 2010.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 31. avgusta 2010 s 54 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted its opinion with 55 votes in favour, 2 votes against and 1 abstention on 28 January 2010.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 28. januarja 2010 s 55 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The section had adopted its opinion with 58 votes in favour, 2 votes against and 2 abstentions on 25 February 2010.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 25. februarja 2010 z 58 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The section had adopted the opinion by 24 votes to 10, with one abstention, on 24 March 2006.
Strokovna skupina je svoje mnenje sprejela 24. marca 2006 s 24 glasovi za, 10 glasovi proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The section had adopted the opinion by 37 votes, with 1 abstention, on 6 January 2009.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 6. januarja 2009 s 37 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The section had adopted the opinion by 62 votes to 4, with 9 abstentions, on 16 November 2010.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 16. novembra 2010 z 62 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion by 69 votes, with 14 abstentions, on 8 March 2012.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 8. marca 2012 z 69 glasovi za in 14 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion by a majority on 2 March 2010, with 57 votes in favour, one against and three abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela z večino glasov 2. marca 2010, in sicer s 57 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion by a majority, with 41 votes in favour and one against with 3 abstentions, on 24 April 2009.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 24. aprila 2009 z večino, tj. 41 glasovi za, enim glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion by a majority, with 64 votes in favour and two against with 11 abstentions, on 15 July 2008.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 15. julija 2008 z večino glasov, s 64 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion on 1 October 2008 by 60 votes in favour to 2, with 1 abstention.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 1. oktobra 2008 s 60 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 1 vzdržanim glasom.
The section had adopted the opinion on 19 December 2012 by 55 votes to 15, with 15 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 19. decembra 2012 s 55 glasovi za, 15 glasovi proti in 15 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion on 3 May 2007 by 71 votes to two, with five abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 3. maja 2007 z 71 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion on 30 April 2012 by 48 votes in favour, 23 against and 13 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 30. aprila 2012 z 48 glasovi za, 23 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion on 6 March 2012 by 69 votes to 4, with 3 abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 6. marca 2012 z 69 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section had adopted the opinion on 6 November 2008 by 55 votes in favour to eight, with two abstentions.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje sprejela 6. novembra 2008 s 55 glasovi za, 8 glasovi proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma.
The Section had adopted the opinion unanimously on 2 September 2009.
Strokovna skupina je mnenje soglasno sprejela 2. septembra 2009.
The Section held its 69th meeting on 27 July 2005 from 9.30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
69. seja strokovne skupine je potekala 27. julija 2005 od 9h30 do 17h.
The section of the operational programme referred to in Article 20(1)(o) covering the part of the multiannual programme referred to in Article 37(5) of the [Regulation on Common Fisheries Policy] for the year 2014 shall be transmitted by 31 October 2013 at the latest.
Oddelek operativnega programa iz člena 20(1)(o) o delu večletnega progama iz člena 37(5) [Uredbe o skupni ribiški politiki] za leto 2014 se predloži najpozneje 31. oktobra 2013.
The section on existing exposure situations addresses indoor exposure to radon, with a somewhat lower maximum reference level for existing dwellings than in Commission Recommendation 90/143/Euratom, in line with ICRP and WHO recommendations.
Razdelek o obstoječih primerih izpostavljenosti obravnava izpostavljenost radonu v bivalnem okolju, pri čemer velja nekoliko nižji maksimalni referenčni nivo za obstoječa bivalna območja od nivoja v Priporočilu Komisije 90/143/Euratom, kot priporočata ICRP in SZO.
The section opinion had been adopted by 23 votes to 3, with 4 abstentions on 22 March 2007.
Mnenje strokovne skupine je bilo sprejeto 22. marca 2007 s 23 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The Section opinion was then put to the vote and adopted by 159 votes in favour, 5 against and 13 abstentions.
Mnenje Odbora je bilo sprejeto s 159 glasovi za, 5 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section opinion, incorporating the compromise amendment on point 5.11, was then put to the vote and adopted by 158 votes in favour, 2 against and 7 abstentions.
Mnenje strokovne skupine s kompromisnim amandmajem k točki 5.11 je bilo sprejeto s 158 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi.
The section president, Mr Malosse, opened the debate by noting, among other things, that the section had adopted the opinion unanimously.
Predsednik strokovne skupine, g. MALOSSE, je začel razpravo, pri čemer je med drugim poudaril, da je strokovna skupina mnenje sprejela soglasno.
The section referred to in point (b) of paragraph 4 shall contain the following information:
Oddelek iz točke (b) odstavka 4 vsebuje naslednje informacije:
The section referred to in point (d) of paragraph 4 shall contain the following information:
Oddelek iz točke (d) odstavka 4 vsebuje naslednje informacije:
The section referred to in point c) of paragraph 4 shall contain the following information:
Oddelek iz točke (c) odstavka 4 vsebuje naslednje informacije:
The sections Antidiscrimination and Diversity and Gender Equality of the PROGRESS programme - € 241,52 million (2007-2013), 35% of the overall PROGRESS budget.
Oddelka „Nediskriminacija in različnost“ in „Enakost spolov“ Programa PROGRESS – 241,52 milijona EUR (2007–2013), kar je 35% celotnega proračuna Programa PROGRESS.
The sector accounts for 3.4 million full time jobs – or 1.7% of total EU employment8.
Sektor zagotavlja 3,4 milijona delovnih mest s polnim delovnim časom, kar je 1,7 % vseh delovnih mest v EU8.
The sector comprises 1 700 businesses, which represent a quarter of the country's total industrial production.
V sektorju je več kot 1 700 podjetij, ki predstavljajo četrtino celotne industrijske proizvodnje v državi.
The sector could also benefit from a procurement policy which stimulates innovation in technical textiles (particularly in sectors like health, defence and transport).
Ta sektor bi lahko imel koristi tudi od politike javnih naročil, ki bi spodbujala inovacije tehničnega tekstila (zlasti na področju zdravja, obrambe in prometa).
The sector directly employs 3.4 million people, around 1.5 % of all Europeans in employment.
Sektor neposredno zaposluje 3,4 milijona ljudi, kar pomeni približno 1,5 % vseh aktivno zaposlenih Evropejcev.
The sector farms 3% of the cultivated area and produces 17% of the value of EU's agricultural production.
Ta sektor obdeluje 3 % obdelovalnih površin in proizvaja 17 % vrednosti kmetijske proizvodnje v EU.
The sector has a high rate of innovation, with annual expenditure of EUR 20 bn on research and development (R &amp; D), or 4% of its turnover.
Za ta sektor je značilna visoka stopnja inovacij z letnimi izdatki za raziskave in razvoj (R &amp; R) v višini 20 milijard EUR ali 4 % njegovega prihodka.
The sector has a turnover of EUR 1 107 billion and employs approximately 4.6 million people in the European Union1.
Prihodek panoge znaša 1.107 milijard EUR, v njej pa je zaposlenih približno 4,6 milijonov ljudi v Evropski uniji1.
The sector has significant untapped potential for cost-effective energy savings which, if realized, would mean that in 2020 the EU will consume 11% less final energy.
Sektor ima znaten neizkoriščen potencial za stroškovno učinkovite energijske prihranke, ki bi pomenili, da bi leta 2020 EU porabila 11 % manj končne energije.
The sector has significant untapped potential for cost-effective energy savings which, if realized, would mean that in 2020 the EU will consume 11% less final energy.
Sektor ima znaten neizkoriščen potencial za stroškovno učinkovite energijske prihranke, ki bi pomenili, da bi leta 2020 EU porabila za 11 % manj končne energije.
The sector is expected to grow by 2-3% by 2020, while cruise tourism alone could create 100 000 new jobs between 2010 and 2020.
Do leta 2020 se pričakuje od 2- do 3-odstotna rast, samo sektor križarjenj pa bi lahko med letoma 2010 in 2020 ustvaril 100 000 dodatnih delovnih mest.
The sector itself is worth EUR 77 billion (2015) and was one of the few sectors untouched by the global financial crisis.
Vrednost industrije znaša 77 milijard EUR (2015); to je ena od redkih panog, ki jih ni prizadela svetovna finančna kriza.
The sector itself is worth EUR 77 billion (2015) and was one of the few sectors untouched by the global financial crisis.
Vrednost te panoge znaša 77 milijard EUR (2015); je ena od redkih, ki jih ni prizadela svetovna finančna kriza.
The sector makes up at least 10% of the EU economy
ta sektor predstavlja najmanj 10 % gospodarstva EU,
The sector provides between 1,2 and 1,5 million jobs contributing to meet the EU 2020 objective of 75% employment rate and representing around 1% of GDP.
Ta sektor zagotavlja od 1,2 do 1,5 milijona delovnih mest, kar prispeva k doseganju cilja EU za leto 2020 – 75-odstotne stopnje zaposlovanja – in pomeni približno 1 % BDP.
The sector represents 11% of GDP and almost 15% of jobs, accounting for almost 36 million employees in over 6 million businesses, which comprise 29% of all businesses and include a very high level of SMEs and micro-enterprises.
Sektor predstavlja 11 % BDP in skoraj 15 % delovnih mest, kar znaša približno 36 milijonov zaposlenih v več kot šestih milijonih podjetij, to je 29 % vseh podjetij, med njimi pa je velik delež malih in srednjih podjetij ter mikropodjetij.
The sector represents 4.5% of European GDP and even more if the value added of ICT in other sectors is also accounted for.
Sektor predstavlja 4,5 % evropskega BDP ali celo več, če štejemo tudi dodano vrednost IKT v ostalih sektorjih.
The sector shall be defined with reference to the characteristic sectorial Product Portfolio18 using NACE codes (i.e. in line with the Nomenclature générale des Activités Economiques dans les Communautés Européennes NACE Rev. 2).
Sektor je treba opredeliti ob upoštevanju značilnega sektorskega portfelja izdelkov18 in na podlagi kod NACE (tj. v skladu s statistično klasifikacijo gospodarskih dejavnosti v Evropski skupnosti NACE Rev. 2).
The sectoral breakdown (Annex 4) shows that it is the construction sector in the broadest sense that dominates the national notifications, with structures, buildings and construction, concrete and metal structures all featuring regularly in the top ten areas for notifications.
Sektorska razčlenitev (Priloga 4) kaže, da se v gradbeništvu v najširšem smislu uporabljajo uradna obvestila, in sicer na področju konstrukcij, stavbarstva in gradnje, betonskih in kovinskih konstrukcij, ki se vsa redno uvrščajo med prvih deset področij, za katera se najpogosteje izdajajo uradna obvestila.
The sectoral breakdown (Annex 4) shows that it is the construction sector which dominates the national notifications.
Sektorska razčlenitev (Priloga 4) kaže, da se nacionalna uradna obvestila najpogosteje uporabljajo v gradbeništvu.
The sectoral breakdown (Annex 4) shows that the construction sector, in its broadest sense, dominates the national notifications, with structures, and fire protection at the top.
Razčlenitev po sektorjih (Priloga 4) kaže, da je največ nacionalnih uradnih obvestil s področja gradbeništva v najširšem smislu, in sicer so najpogosteje povezana s konstrukcijami in protipožarno zaščito.
The Sectoral Dialogue Committee set up under Commission Decision 98/500/EC of 20 May 1998 on the establishment of Sectoral Dialogue Committees promoting the Dialogue between the social partners at European level9 should also be consulted.
Posvetovati se je treba tudi z Odborom za sektorski dialog, ustanovljenim na podlagi Sklepa Komisije 98/500/ES z dne 20. maja 1998 o ustanovitvi Odborov sektorskega dialoga med socialnimi partnerji na evropski ravni9.
The sectorial agendas for VET (the Copenhagen-Bruges process) and the Renewed European Agenda for AL require a more detailed identification – and endorsement via this Joint Report – of the deliverables/ priorities for the period up to 2020.
Za sektorske programe za poklicno izobraževanje in usposabljanje (københavnsko-bruški proces) ter prenovljeni evropski program za izobraževanje odraslih je potrebna podrobnejša opredelitev – in potrditev v tem skupnem poročilu – ciljev/prednostnih nalog za obdobje do leta 2020.
The sectors concerned are first and foremost the automotive sector, with more than 12 000 workers targeted, followed by textiles, with more than 11 000 workers13.
Zadevna sektorja sta predvsem avtomobilski sektor z več kot 12 000 delavci, ki potrebujejo pomoč, in tekstilni sektor z več kot 11 000 delavci13.
The sectors concerned are first and foremost the automotive sector, with more than 18 000 workers targeted, followed by textiles (more than 11 000 targeted workers) and the building construction sector (slightly more than 10 000 targeted workers)12.
Prizadeta sektorja sta predvsem avtomobilski sektor z več kot 18 000 delavci, katerim je namenjena podpora, tekstilni sektor (z več kot 11 000 delavci, katerim je namenjena podpora) ter sektor gradnje stavb (z nekoliko več kot 10 000 delavci, katerim je namenjena podpora)12.
The sectors of ‘wearing apparel’, ‘construction’, ‘furniture’ and ‘retail trade’ have the lowest average amounts (around EUR 1 000 per worker).
Sektorji „oblačila“, „gradbeništvo“, „pohištvo“ in „trgovina na drobno“ so prejeli najnižje povprečne zneske (okrog 1 000 EUR na delavca).
The sectors questioned for input to this information report represent the bulk of manufacturing industry in Europe.
The sectors questioned for input to this information report represent the bulk of manufacturing industry in Europe. &lt; }0{ &gt; Sektorji, ki so pozvani, da za to informativno poročilo prispevajo svoj vložek, predstavljajo večji del proizvodne industrije v Evropi.
The sectors ‘furniture’, ‘retail trade’ and ‘wearing apparel’ have the lowest average amounts (around EUR 1 000 per worker).
Sektorji „pohištvo“, „trgovina na drobno“ in „oblačila“, so prejeli najnižje povprečne zneske (okrog 1 000 EUR na delavca).
The Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group may submit opinions and advice to the Authority on any issue related to the tasks of the Authority specified in Articles 7 and 8.
Interesna skupina za vrednostne papirje in trge lahko izdaja mnenja in nasvete za organ o kakršnem koli vprašanju v zvezi z nalogami organa, določenimi v členih 7 in 8.
The Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group shall be composed of 30 members, representing in balanced proportions Community financial market participants, their employees as well as consumers, investors and users of financial services.
Interesna skupina za vrednostne papirje in trge je sestavljena iz 30 članov, ki sorazmerno zastopajo udeležence na finančnem trgu v Skupnosti, njihovo osebje ter potrošnike, vlagatelje in uporabnike finančnih storitev.
The Security and Safeguarding Liberties programme69 (€745 million for 2007-2013) helps the EU in pursuing its fight against terrorism and crime.
Program „Varnost in varstvo svoboščin“69 (745 milijonov EUR za obdobje 2007–2013) podpira EU v njenem boju proti terorizmu in kriminalu.
The security costs for airports and States in 2002 for the then 15 Member States and Norway, Iceland and Switzerland were estimated at €2 billion.
Stroški varovanja za letališča in države so bili leta 2002 za takratnih 15 držav članic ter Norveško, Islandijo in Švico ocenjeni na 2 milijardi EUR.
The segment of the medical devices market subject to pricing and reimbursement decisions is small (15%) and decreasing.
Segment trga medicinskih pripomočkov, ki so predmet odločitev o določanju cen in povračil, je majhen (15 %) in se še zmanjšuje.
The selected option 3 would ensure full participation in the process of converging practices and developing common tools, and would thus meet the expectations of users.
Izbrana možnost 3 bi zagotovila celovito sodelovanje v postopku usklajevanja praks in razvijanja skupnih orodij ter tako izpolnila pričakovanja uporabnikov.
The selected topics were those (policy mixes for R &amp; D, coordinating Structural Funds and the Framework Programme, R &amp; D in services, internationalisation of R &amp; D) where the interest of a large majority of CREST delegations was shown and where Member States displayed a clear will to take ownership of the process and to provide the leadership necessary to drive the discussions to tangible results.
Izbrane teme so bile tiste (mešanice politik za R &amp; R, usklajevanje strukturnih skladov in okvirnega programa, R &amp; R v storitvah, internacionalizacija R &amp; R), za katere je velika večina predstavnikov OZTR pokazala zanimanje in kjer so države članice pokazale jasno voljo za prevzem postopka in za zagotovitev vodstva, potrebnega za doseganje oprijemljivih rezultatov pri razpravah.
The selection and approval of all local development strategies shall be completed by 31 December 2015 at the latest.
Vse lokalne razvojne strategije se izberejo in odobrijo najpozneje do 31. decembra 2015.
The selection and monitoring of the 2013 European Capitals of Culture
Izbor in spremljanje EPK za leto 2013
The selection criteria specified in Decisions 1419/EC/1999 and 1622/EC/2006 ensured that the cultural programmes of title-holders were relevant to the detail of Article 167, although the criteria allow each ECOC the freedom to interpret the Treaty objectives in their own unique way.
Merila za izbor, določena v sklepih 1419/ES/1999 in 1622/ES/2006, so zagotavljala, da so kulturni programi nosilcev naziva natančno ustrezali členu 167, čeprav merila vsaki EPK dopuščajo svobodo pri razlagi ciljev Pogodbe na njim lasten način.
The selection processes used in 2008 and 2009
5.1.4. Postopki izbire, uporabljeni v letih 2008 in 2009
The selection rate is very low at around 12%.
Stopnja izbora je zelo nizka, približno 12 %.
The selective distributors of brand A always handle a few competing brands.
Selektivni distributerji blagovne znamke A vedno prodajajo še nekaj konkurenčnih blagovnih znamk.
The selectivity characteristics referred to in paragraph 1(a) and the threshold level and species referred to in paragraph 1(b) shall be defined in the relevant multiannual plan.
Selektivnost iz odstavka 1(a) ter mejne vrednosti in vrste iz odstavka 1(b) se določijo v ustreznem večletnem načrtu.