natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This point can be illustrated by comparing the relative importance of venture capital investments as a financing tool (expressed as a percentage of GDP) in a highly innovative market, such as the United States (0.14%), with the European average (0.03%).
To trditev je mogoče potrditi s primerjavo relativnega pomena naložb v tvegani kapital kot orodja za financiranje (izraženo v odstotkih BDP) na zelo inovativnem trgu, kot so Združene države (0,14 %), z evropskim povprečjem (0,03 %).
This Point does not apply to appropriations for cohesion adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure and pre-allocated by Member States which contain a financial envelope for the entire duration of the programme and to the large scale projects referred to in Article 14 of the MFF Regulation.
Ta točka se ne uporablja za odobritve za kohezijo, ki se sprejemajo po rednem zakonodajnem postopku in jih države članice vnaprej dodelijo ter zajemajo finančna sredstva za celotno trajanje programa, ter za obsežne projekte iz člena 14 uredbe o finančnem okviru.
This point was clearly made by the European Council in its October 2013 conclusions,44 and strongly supported in the public consultation.
To dejstvo je Evropski svet jasno poudaril v svojih sklepih oktobra 201344, močno pa so ga podprli tudi udeleženci javnega posvetovanja.
This point was made by the EESC in its opinion on the State aid action plan – Less and better targeted state aid: a roadmap for state aid reform 2005-20099.
EESO je izrazil svoje stališče v mnenju Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005–20099.
This point was underlined in the October 2006 Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change which concluded that limiting temperature rises to safe levels would cost approximately 1% of global GDP while the cost to the global economy of a business as usual approach would be up to five times as much.
To je bilo poudarjeno tudi v Sternovem poročilu o ekonomiki podnebnih sprememb oktobra 2006, katerega ugotovitve so bili, da bi ohranjanje dviga temperature na varni ravni zahtevalo približno 1 % svetovnega BDP, medtem ko bi bili stroški za svetovno gospodarstvo, ki temelji na pristopu običajnega scenarija, petkrat višji.
This point was underscored by First Vice-President Timmermans in his remarks to the July 2015 meeting of COSAC Chairpersons held in Luxembourg (see section below).
Ta vidik je v svojih pripombah na srečanju predsednikov COSAC, ki je julija 2015 potekalo v Luxembourgu, poudaril prvi podpredsednik Timmermans (glej oddelek v nadaljevanju).
This policy agenda for young people, notably the principle of active support for sustainable labour market integration and the commitment to upgrade their skills and qualifications, is an important part of the Commission's broader efforts to promote upward convergence, within and between Member States.
Ta politična agenda za mlade, zlasti načelo aktivne podpore za trajnostno vključevanje na trg dela in zaveza k izpopolnjevanju njihovih znanj in spretnosti ter kvalifikacij, je pomemben del obsežnejših prizadevanj Komisije za spodbujanje konvergence k višjim standardom v državah članicah in med njimi.
This policy continued with the MEDIA II programme, followed by MEDIA Plus and MEDIA Training (2001-2006).
Ta politika se je izvajala s programom MEDIA II ter pozneje s programoma MEDIA Plus in MEDIA Usposabljanje (2001–2006).
This policy could finally disregard targets for renewable energy and instead be based on a clear GHG reduction target, in accordance with long term GHG reduction needs, and a carbon price high enough to drive better efficiency measures and contribute to R &amp; D and investments by relevant actors, but not too high for consumers and industrial competitiveness.
Pri tej politiki bi lahko končno odmislili cilje v zvezi z energijo iz obnovljivih virov, namesto tega pa bi temeljila na jasnem cilju zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki je v skladu z dolgoročnimi potrebami po zmanjšanju tovrstnih emisij, ter ceni ogljika, ki bi bila tolikšna, da bi spodbujala ukrepe za večjo energetsko učinkovitost ter raziskave in razvoj in naložbe ustreznih akterjev, hkrati pa ne bi bila previsoka za potrošnike in ne bi ogrožala industrijske konkurenčnosti.
This policy must be in accordance with the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 and the Protocol of 31 January 1967 relating to the status of refugees and other relevant treaties".
Ta politika mora biti v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo z dne 28. julija 1951 in Protokolom z dne 31. januarja 1967 o statusu beguncev ter drugimi ustreznimi Pogodbami.“
This policy option could be effective in reducing the eutrophication risk by setting different limits for laundry, ADW and I &amp; I detergents.
Ta možnost politike bi bila učinkovita pri zmanjšanju tveganja evtrofikacije z določitvijo različnih omejitev za detergente za pranje perila, za pomivalne stroje in za uporabo v industriji in ustanovah.
This policy option would also have a positive economic impact for unrepresented citizens who might be less inclined to seek support on their own from suboptimal alternative sources and save time18 (savings would amount to more than 1,8 million EUR).
Ta možnost politike bi imela pozitivni ekonomski učinek tudi za državljane EU brez predstavništva, ki bi se lahko manj nagibali k iskanju podpore na lastno pest iz ne najboljših alternativnih virov in bi prihranili čas18 (prihranki bi znašali več kot 1,8 milijona EUR).
This Policy Option would keep the administrative burden similar to Policy Option 1.
Upravno breme te možnosti politike bi bilo podobno upravnemu bremenu možnosti politike 1.
This policy package would lead to an increase of 1.9-2% passengers that travel by air, corresponding to 27.3-28.7 million passengers per year.
Ta sveženj bi omogočil povečanje števila uporabnikov letalskega prevoza za 1,9 do 2 %, tj. 27,3 do 28,7 milijonov potnikov letno več.
This policy starts from the premise that society must give itself the means to promote dynamic upland agriculture, which is able to perform the tasks of agricultural production and countryside maintenance that are deemed crucial to the spatial planning and future development of these areas.
Ta politika odraža dejstvo, , da družba namenja potrebna sredstva za spodbujanje dinamičnega gorskega kmetijstva, ki je sposobno zagotoviti kmetijsko proizvodnjo in ohranjati krajino, kar je nujno za prihodnje gospodarjenje in razvoj teh območij.
This policy will require fewer resources that option 4a and concentrate them so as to fulfil most of our objectives.
V primerjavi z možnostjo 4a bo ta politika zahtevala manj sredstev, ki bodo natančneje usmerjena za dosego večine naših ciljev.
This policy would not be based on any could finally disregard targets for renewable energy and instead be based, but on a clear GHG reduction target, in accordance with long term GHG reduction needs, and a carbon price high enough to drive better efficiency measures and contribute to R &amp; D and investments by relevant actors, but not too high for consumers and industrial competitiveness.
Podlaga za to Pri tej politikoi ne bi bili bi lahko končno odmislili ciljie v zvezi z energijo iz obnovljivih virov, pač panamesto tega pa bi temeljila na jasenem cilju zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki je v skladu z dolgoročnimi potrebami po zmanjšanju tovrstnih emisij, ter cenai ogljika, ki bi bila tolikšna, da bi spodbujala ukrepe za večjo energetsko učinkovitost ter raziskave in razvoj in naložbe ustreznih akterjev, hkrati pa ne bi bila previsoka za potrošnike in ne bi ogrožala industrijske konkurenčnosti.
This political agreement was confirmed by the Council on 3 December 2015 and, on 11 March 2016, the Council adopted its first reading position.
Svet je 3. decembra 2015 potrdil ta politični dogovor in 11. marca 2016 sprejel stališče v prvi obravnavi.
This poses a particular dilemma for governments in the cohesion countries and, in particular, in the accession countries.
This poses a particular dilemma for governments in the cohesion countries and, in particular, in the accession countries. &lt; }97{ &gt; To pomeni določeno dilemo za vlade v kohezijskih državah in zlasti v državah pristopnicah.
This position shall thoroughly analyse the conditions for the possible applicability of Article 27(1) to the activity concerned in accordance with its paragraphs 2 and 3.
V tem stališču so temeljito analizirani pogoji za možno uporabo člena 27(1) za zadevno dejavnosti v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3 zadevnega člena.
This position was confirmed by Coreper on 22 February.
To stališče je potrdil še 22. februarja.
This position was supported not only by the petroleum industry but also by the European Network of National Sustainable Development Councils and the NGO Transport &amp; Environment.
Tega stališča ni podprla le naftna industrija, ampak tudi Evropska mreža nacionalnih svetov za trajnostni razvoj in Evropsko združenje za promet in okolje.
This possibility is already foreseen in Article 22 of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive for collection and return and recovery systems.
Ta možnost je že predvidena v členu 22 direktive o embalaži in odpadni embalaži za sisteme zbiranja, vračanja in predelave;
This possibility is already foreseen in Article 4(4) of Council Decision 97/836/EC.
Ta možnost je že predvidena v členu 4(4) Sklepa Sveta 97/836/ES.
This possibility is however excluded for pregnancy and maternity, in light of the specific solidarity mechanism created by Article 5(3).
Vendar pa te možnosti ni za nosečnost in materinstvo zaradi posebnega mehanizma solidarnosti, uvedenega s členom 5(3).
This possibility was already provided by the old EMF directive 2004/40.
To možnost je določala že prejšnja direktiva o elektromagnetnih sevanjih (Direktiva 2004/40).
This potential could be as much as doubled if associated with the use of renewable energies or waste disposal, leading to savings of up to 50.7 Mtoe per year.
Prav tako bi bilo ustrezno okrepiti to možnost, če bi lahko uporabili obnovljivo energijo ali obdelali odpadke, kar bi omogočilo prihranke do 50,7 Mtoe na leto.
This potentially benefits over 400 million EU citizens,12 and implies that Member States trust in each other's ability to guard effectively the external borders on behalf of the EU and to issue visas valid for the whole Schengen area.
To lahko koristi več kot 400 milijonom državljanov EU12 in pomeni, da države članice zaupajo v sposobnost drugih držav članic na področju učinkovitega varovanja zunanjih meja v imenu EU in izdajanja vizumov, veljavnih na celotnem schengenskem območju.
This power may not be granted for a longer period than the power for which provision is made in Article 67(2).
Navedenega pooblastila ni mogoče podeliti za daljše obdobje kakor za pooblastilo iz člena 67 (2).
This practice is already followed in other directives, in particular in the latest Directive 2006/25/EC on physical agents (artificial optical radiation).
Tak je bil postopek pri drugih direktivah, zlasti pri zadnji Direktivi 2006/25/ES o fizikalnih dejavnikih (umetnih optičnih sevanjih).
This preferential treatment will continue to be in place also under Basel III as well as under the draft proposal.
Ta prednostna obravnava bo še naprej veljala tudi v skladu s sporazumom Basel III in osnutkom predloga.
This preliminary list of options was submitted to public and stakeholder consultation and has been further assessed with a view to identifying the preferred package of options.
Ta predhodni seznam možnosti je bil predložen v javno posvetovanje in posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi ter je bil dodatno ocenjen z namenom, da se opredeli sveženj najprimernejših možnosti.
This preliminary representative error rate is close to 5 % (for the Directorate General Research and Innovation).
Ta predhodna reprezentativna stopnja napak (za Generalni direktorat za raziskave in razvoj) je blizu 5 %.
This preliminary representative error rate is close to 5 % (for the Directorate General Research and Innovation).
Ta predhodna reprezentativna stopnja napak je blizu 5 % (za Generalni direktorat za raziskave in inovacije).
This preliminary representative error rate is close to 5 % (for the Directorate General Research and Innovation).
Ta predhodna reprezentativna stopnja napak je blizu 5 % (za Generalni direktorate za raziskave in inovacije).
This preparatory work benefited also greatly from various actions, studies, workshops etc. related to the implementation of the ITS Action Plan (see Commission Staff Working Document on Progress Report and review of the ITS Action Plan).
Pri tem pripravljalnem delu so bili zelo v pomoč različnih ukrepi, študije, delavnice itd., povezani z izvajanjem akcijskega načrta ITS (glej delovni dokument služb Komisije o poročilu o napredku in pregledu akcijskega načrta ITS).
This price adjustment measure only applies to contracts with an estimated value equal to or greater than EUR 5 million, which the Commission believes would reduce the risk of retaliation by third countries.
Ta ukrep prilagoditve cen se uporabi le pri naročilih, katerih ocenjena vrednost je 5 milijonov EUR ali več, s čimer naj bi se po mnenju Komisije zmanjšalo tveganje povračilnih ukrepov tretjih držav.
This principle is already included in the General Food Law (Regulation (EC) No 178/2002) and the amendment has been accepted in the Commission amended proposal.
To načelo je že vključeno v splošno živilsko zakonodajo (Uredba (ES) št. 178/2002), sprememba pa je bila sprejeta v spremenjeni predlog Komisije.
This principle is established by Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2001 on cross-border payments in euro5, which applies to cross-border payments in euro and Swedish Kronor up to EUR 50 000.
To načelo vzpostavlja Uredba (ES) št. 2560/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. decembra 2001 o čezmejnih plačilih v eurih,5 ki se uporablja za čezmejna plačila v eurih in švedskih kronah do zneska 50 000 EUR.
This principle is fully reflected in the Communication Delivering a new deal for consumers of July 2015.18 The Communication acknowledges that consumers are still prevented from playing their full role in the transition of the energy system.
To načelo je v celoti izraženo v sporočilu Zagotovitev novega dogovora za odjemalce iz julija 201518. V sporočilu se priznava, da odjemalci še vedno ne morejo polno sodelovati v prehodu na nov energetski sistem.
This principle is reinforced by the jurisdiction provisions applicable in cases of cross-border child abduction (Article 10).
To načelo je okrepljeno z določbami o pristojnosti, ki se uporabljajo v primerih čezmejne ugrabitve otrok (člen 10).
This priority setting and the definition of S &amp; T Cooperation policies will have direct and measurable impacts on the other activities foreseen for International S &amp; T Cooperation under the Capacities Specific Programme, namely: enhancement and development of S &amp; T Agreements, S &amp; T Cooperation Partnerships and a positive synergistic effect on the coordination of national policies and activities on international S &amp; T cooperation.
Ta določitev prednostnih nalog in opredelitev politik sodelovanja na področju znanosti in tehnologije bosta imeli neposreden in merljiv vpliv na druge dejavnosti, predvidene za sodelovanje na področju znanosti in tehnologije v okviru posebnega programa „Zmogljivosti“, in sicer na: krepitev in oblikovanje sporazumov na področju znanosti in tehnologije, partnerstev za sodelovanje na področju znanosti in tehnologije ter pozitivnega sinergijskega učinka na usklajevanje nacionalnih politik in dejavnosti v zvezi z mednarodnim sodelovanjem na področju znanosti in tehnologije.
This priority-setting appears to be urgently necessary, given the ongoing weak economic situation and the persistently high level of unemployment.
1 Slednje so zaradi trajno šibke konjunkture in visoke brezposelnosti nujno potrebne.
This Prize was awarded for the first time to the 2010 titles and again to the 2011 and the 2012 titles.
Nagrada je bila prvič podeljena prestolnicama za leto 2010 ter ponovno za leti naziva 2011 in 2012.
This problem has, however, already been addressed by the Commission's proposal for revising Regulation Brussels I.
To težavo je že obravnaval predlog Komisije za prenovitev uredbe Bruselj I;
This problem of access to modern energy services is so great that the UN declared 2012 "The International Year of Sustainable Energy for All" (Resolution 65/151), mainly to promote universal access.
Ta problem dostopa do sodobnih energetskih storitev je tako velik, da je OZN leto 2012 razglasila za mednarodno leto trajnostne energije za vse (resolucija 65/151), da bi tako spodbudila univerzalni dostop do trajnostnih virov energije.
This procedure commenced on 10 March 2006, and will culminate, once all the various legal conditions have been met, in an amendment to the Council regulation.
Postopek se je začel 10. marca 2006 in bo dokončno prišel do izraza s spremembo uredbe Sveta potem, ko bodo izpolnjeni različni pravni pogoji.
This procedure is also to apply to the additional resource referred to in Article 2(1)(d) of the said Decision, hereinafter referred to as ‘the additional resource’, created in accordance with Council Directive 89/130/EEC, Euratom of 13 February 1989 on the harmonization of the compilation of the gross national product at market prices14.
Ta postopek se uporablja tudi za sredstva iz dodatnega vira iz člena 2(1)(d) omenjenega sklepa, v nadaljevanju „sredstva iz dodatnega vira“, oblikovana v skladu z Direktivo Sveta št. 89/130/EGS, Euratom z dne 13. februarja 1989 o usklajevanju načinov za obračunavanje bruto nacionalnega proizvoda po tržnih cenah14.
This procedure is without prejudice to the notification procedure provided for in Directive 98/34/EC2015/1535/EU and the Commission's prerogatives under the Treaty in respect of infringements of Community Ö Union Õ law.
Ta postopek ne posega v notifikacijskipriglasitvenipostopek, predviden določen v Direktivi 98/34/ES2015/1535/EU, in posebne pravice Komisije po Pogodbi v zvezi s kršitvami zakonodaje Skupnosti Ö prava Unije Õ.
This process for Stage IIIB, according to standard industrial lead times, is expected to take between 3 and 6 years.
Pričakuje se, da bo ta postopek za stopnjo IIIB v skladu s standardnimi časovnimi roki industrije trajal od 3 do 6 let.
This process had, however, already started before 1 January 2007 with an average net growth around 220 000 per year between 2003 and 2006.
Vendar pa se je ta proces začel že pred 1. januarjem 2007 s povprečno neto rastjo približno 220 000 oseb na leto med letoma 2003 in 2006.
This process has led to focusing the action plan, for the period up to 20133, on the domains that are shaded darker (cf. figure 1): applications for individual handsets and mobile phones; road transport; aviation; maritime transport and fisheries; precision agriculture and environment protection; civil protection and surveillance.
Po tem postopku je bilo odločeno, da se v akcijskem načrtu za obdobje do leta 20133 pozornost usmeri na področja, ki so osenčena temneje (glej sliko 1): aplikacije za osebne terminalske naprave in mobilne telefone; cestni promet; letalstvo; pomorski promet in ribištvo; precizno kmetijstvo in varstvo okolja; civilna zaščita in nadzor.
This process implies a review of these codes at national level by the competent data protection authority, and a review at European level through the "Article 29 Working Party"9.
Ta postopek določa pregled kodeksov na nacionalni ravni, ki ga izvede pristojen organ za varstvo podatkov, in pregled na evropski ravni, ki ga izvede Delovna skupina iz člena 299.
This process involved extensive additional implementing work, with six Council implementing directives adopted from mid-1993 to mid-1997 and a further 60 Commission directives adopted in the following ten years before the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 396/20054 consolidating and simplifying the acquis.
Od sredine leta 1993 do sredine leta 1997 je bilo sprejetih šest izvedbenih direktiv Sveta, v naslednjih desetih letih pa še 60 direktiv Komisije, preden je bila sprejeta Uredba (ES) št. 396/20054, s katero se je utrdil in poenostavil pravni red EU.
This process should be distinguished from structured civil dialogue (Article 11(2) TFEU) and consultations carried out within specific frameworks, such as consultation of the social partners as part of social dialogue (employers' organisations and trade unions) (Article 154 TFEU) or of advisory bodies, such as the European Economic and Social Committee (Article 304 TFEU)2.
Treba je razlikovati med tem procesom in strukturiranim civilnim dialogom (člen 11(2) PDEU) ali posvetovanji, ki potekajo v točno določenih okvirih, kot je posvetovanje s socialnimi partnerji v okviru socialnega dialoga (organizacije delodajalcev in sindikati, člen 154 PDEU) ali posvetovanje s posvetovalnimi organi, kot je EESO (člen 304 PDEU)2.
This process should be supported through R &amp; D efforts.
Ta proces bi bilo treba podpreti s prizadevanji na področju raziskav in razvoja.
This process should continue to be promoted and supported through R &amp; D efforts.
Ta proces bi bilo treba spodbujati in podpreti s prizadevanji na področju raziskav in razvoja.
This process should include, inter alia: strengthening synergies between networks of universities/colleges/engineering schools and companies; image enhancement (establishing a media pool); better information about existing programmes, projects and financing, paying particular attention to SMEs; drawing up common European qualification standards; better forward-looking human resources management, including reinforced social dialogue, especially in the new Member States.
V ta proces je treba med drugim zajeti: krepitev sinergij med mrežami univerz/visokih šol/inženirskih šol in podjetji; povečanje ugleda (ustanovitev medijskega združenja); boljša obveščenost o obstoječih programih, projektih in financiranju, s posebno pozornostjo namenjeno malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, priprava skupnih evropskih standardov usposobljenosti, boljše, v prihodnost usmerjeno upravljanje človeških virov, vključno z okrepljenim socialnim dialogom, zlasti v novih državah članicah.
This process was based on an online questionnaire accompanied by a background paper 'What funding for EU external action after 2013?' prepared by Commission and EEAS services involved.
Posvetovanje je potekalo prek spletnega vprašalnika, ki ga je spremljal razlagalni dokument z naslovom „Kakšno naj bo financiranje zunanjih ukrepov EU po letu 2013?“, ki so ga pripravile zadevne službe Komisije in Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje.
This process was based on an online questionnaire accompanied by a background paper 'What funding for EU external action after 2013?' prepared by Commission and EEAS staff.
Posvetovanje je potekalo prek spletnega vprašalnika, ki ga je spremljal razlagalni dokument z naslovom: „Kakšno naj bo financiranje zunanjih ukrepov EU po letu 2013?“, ki sta ga pripravila Komisija in osebje EEAS.
This process was based on an online questionnaire accompanied by a background paper 'What funding for EU external action after 2013?'.
Posvetovanje je potekalo prek spletnega vprašalnika in priloženega referenčnega dokumenta z naslovom „Kakšno naj bo financiranje zunanjih ukrepov EU po letu 2013?“.
This process was based on an online questionnaire accompanied by a background paper 'What funding for EU external action after 2013?'.
Posvetovanje je potekalo prek spletnega vprašalnika in priloženega referenčnega dokumenta z naslovom: „Kakšno naj bo financiranje zunanjih ukrepov EU po letu 2013?“.
This process was based on an online questionnaire accompanied by a background paper 'What funding for EU external action after 2013’ prepared by Commission and EEAS.
Posvetovanje je potekalo prek spletnega vprašalnika, ki ga je spremljal razlagalni dokument z naslovom: „Kakšno naj bo financiranje zunanjih ukrepov EU po letu 2013?“, ki sta ga pripravili Komisija in ESZD.