natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Where, upon receipt of the additional explanations, the remaining time period for notifying the decision referred to in paragraph 4 is less than three days in the case of low-intervention clinical trials, and less than five days for other than low-intervention clinical trials, it shall be extended to three and five days respectively.
Če je po prejemu dodatnih pojasnil preostali rok za obvestilo o sklepu iz odstavka 4 v primeru kliničnih preskušanj z minimalno intervencijo krajši od treh dni ter v primeru kliničnih preskušanj, ki niso preskušanja z minimalno intervencijo, krajši od petih dni, se ta rok podaljša na tri oziroma pet dni.
Where, upon receipt of the additional explanations, the remaining time period for submitting Part I of the assessment report is less than five days, it shall be extended to five days.
Če je po prejemu dodatnih pojasnil preostali rok za predložitev dela I poročila o oceni krajši od petih dni, se podaljša na pet dni.
Where, upon receipt of the additional explanations, the remaining time period for submitting Part I of the assessment report is less than three days in the case of low-intervention clinical trials, and less than five days for other than low-intervention clinical trials, it shall be extended to three and five days respectively.
Če je po prejemu dodatnih pojasnil preostali rok za predložitev dela I poročila o oceni v primeru kliničnih preskušanj z minimalno intervencijo krajši od treh dni ter v primeru kliničnih preskušanj, ki niso preskušanja z minimalno intervencijo, krajši od petih dni, se ta rok podaljša na tri oziroma pet dni.
Where, upon receipt of the additional explanations, the remaining time period for the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 is less than five days, it shall be extended to five days.
Če je po prejemu dodatnih pojasnil preostali rok za pripravo ocene iz odstavka 1 krajši od petih dni, se podaljša na pet dni.
Where, upon receiving the additional explanations, the remaining time period for completing the assessment referred to in paragraph 1 is less than five days, it shall be extended to five days.
Če je po prejemu dodatnih pojasnil preostali rok za pripravo ocene iz odstavka 1 krajši od petih dni, se podaljša na pet dni.
Where, within 6 months of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 4, no objection has been raised by either a Member State or the Commission in respect of a provisional measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified.
Kadar država članica ali Komisija v obdobju 6 mesecev po prejemu informacij iz odstavka 4 ne predloži nobenega ugovora glede začasnega ukrepa, ki ga je sprejela država članica, se šteje, da je navedeni ukrep upravičen.
Where, within 60 days of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 5, no objection has been raised by either a Member State or the Commission in respect of a provisional measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified.
Kadar država članica ali Komisija v obdobju 60 dni po prejemu informacij iz odstavka 5 ne predloži nobenega ugovora glede začasnega ukrepa, ki ga je sprejela država članica, se šteje, da je navedeni ukrep upravičen.
Where, within one month after the notification of the restrictive measures taken by an approval authority or a market surveillance authority in accordance with Article 53(1), an objection has been raised by another Member State in respect of the notified restrictive measure or where the Commission establishes a non-compliance in accordance with Article 9(5), the Commission shall consult without delay the Member States and the relevant economic operator or operators and, in particular, the approval authority that granted the type-approval, and shall evaluate the national measure taken.
Če druga država članica v enem mesecu po priglasitvi omejevalnih ukrepov, ki jih je v skladu s členom 53(1) sprejel homologacijski organ ali organ za nadzor trga, predloži ugovor glede priglašenega omejevalnega ukrepa ali če Komisija ugotovi neskladnost v skladu s členom 9(5), se Komisija nemudoma posvetuje z državami članicami ali ustreznimi gospodarskimi subjekti in zlasti homologacijskim organom, ki je podelil homologacijo, ter oceni sprejet nacionalni ukrep.
Where, within one month after the notification of the restrictive measures taken in accordance with Article 53(1), no objection has been raised by either another Member State or by the Commission in respect of a restrictive measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified.
Če druge države članice ali Komisija v enem mesecu po priglasitvi omejevalnega ukrepa, sprejetega v skladu s členom 53(1), ne predložijo nobenega ugovora glede omejevalnega ukrepa, ki ga sprejme država članica ali Komisija, se šteje, da je ukrep upravičen.
Where, within one month of receipt of the notification regarding the approved remedies referred to in Article 57(3), no objection has been raised against those remedies by either another Member State or the Commission, those remedies shall be deemed justified.
Kadar druge države članice ali Komisija v enem mesecu po prejemu obvestila v zvezi z odobrenimi popravnimi ukrepi iz člena 57(3) ne predložijo nobenega ugovora, se navedeni popravni ukrepi štejejo za upravičene.
Where, within one month of the receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 1, an objection has been raised by either another Member State or the Commission in respect of a restrictive measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be evaluated by the Commission in accordance with Article 51.
Če druge države članice ali Komisija v enem mesecu po prejetju informacij iz odstavka 1 ne pošljejo ugovora glede omejevalnega ukrepa, ki ga je sprejela država članica, ukrep oceni Komisija v skladu s členom 51.
Where, within one month of the receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 1, no objection has been raised by either another Member State or the Commission in respect of a restrictive measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified.
Če druge države članice ali Komisija v enem mesecu po prejemu informacij iz odstavka 1 ne pošljejo nobenega ugovora glede omejevalnega ukrepa, ki ga sprejme država članica, se šteje, da je ukrep upravičen.
where, within the above limit, the materials classified within the same heading as the product are only used up to a value of 25 % of the ex-works price of the product
kot izdelek, uporabljajo samo do vrednosti 25 % cene izdelka franko tovarna
Where, within two months of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 4, no objection has been raised by either a Member State or the Commission in respect of a provisional measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified.
Kadar država članica ali Komisija v obdobju dveh mesecev po prejemu informacij iz odstavka 4 ne predloži nobenega ugovora glede začasnega ukrepa, ki ga je izvedla država članica, se šteje, da je navedeni ukrep upravičen.
Where, within two months of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 4, no objection has been raised by either a Member State or the Commission in respect of a provisional measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified.
Če v obdobju dveh mesecev po prejemu informacij iz odstavka 4 država članica ali Komisija ne vloži nobenega ugovora glede začasnega ukrepa, ki ga je sprejela država članica, se šteje, da je ukrep upravičen.
Where, within two months of receipt of the information referred to in paragraph 4, no objection has been raised by either a Member State or the Commission in respect of a provisional measure taken by a Member State, that measure shall be deemed justified.
Če v obdobju dveh mesecev po prejemu informacij iz odstavka 4 država članica ali Komisija ne vloži nobenega ugovora glede začasnega ukrepa, ki ga je sprejela država članica, se šteje, da je navedeni ukrep upravičen.
where: K1 = 0,2 + 0,02 log10 V
kjer je: K1 = 0,2 + 0,02 log10V
Wherea bridge institution is used for the purpose of transferring assets and liabilities of more than one institution the obligation referred to in paragraph 7 shall refer to the liquidation of the assets and liabilities transferred from each of the institutions and not to the bridge institution itself.
Kadar se premostitvena institucija uporabi za namen prenosa sredstev in obveznosti več kot ene institucije, se obveznost iz odstavka 7 nanaša na likvidacijo sredstev in obveznosti, ki so bile prenesene z vsake posamezne institucije, in ne na premostitveno institucijo samo.
Whereas 20% of the world’s overall demand for construction equipment was coming from Europe in 2005, the latter will only account for 14% of the total worldwide demand in 20141.
Leta 2005 je evropski delež skupnega svetovnega povpraševanja po gradbeni opremi znašal 20 %, leta 2014 pa bo znašal le še 14 %.1
Whereas a structural adjustment of 0.2% of GDP in 2017 would be sufficient to reach the medium-term budgetary objective, a higher structural adjustment would be needed to ensure compliance with the debt reduction benchmark.
Čeprav bi bila strukturna prilagoditev v višini 0,2 % BDP v letu 2017 zadostna za dosego srednjeročnega proračunskega cilja, bi bila za zagotovitev izpolnjevanja merila glede zmanjšanja dolga potrebna višja strukturna prilagoditev.
Whereas all these additions can be supported by the Commission, the Council amendment that Article 10 should be without prejudice to any national rules regarding the validity of the conclusion of credit agreements is more problematic.
Medtem ko Komisija lahko podpre vse te dodatke, pa je težavnejša sprememba Sveta, da člen 10 ne sme posegati v nacionalna pravila glede veljavnosti sklenitve kreditnih pogodb.
Whereas Article 10 of the Agreement in the form prior to its amendment with this Amending Protocol, which currently provides for exchange of information upon request limited to conduct constituting tax fraud and the like should be aligned to the OECD standard on transparency and exchange of information in tax matters,
ob upoštevanju, da je treba člen 10 Sporazuma v obliki, kakršna je pred spremembo s tem protokolom o spremembi, ki trenutno zagotavlja izmenjavo podatkov na zaprosilo, omejenih na dejanja, ki predstavljajo davčno goljufijo ali podobno, uskladiti s standardom OECD o preglednosti in izmenjavi podatkov v davčnih zadevah,
Whereas Article 12 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments2, hereinafter referred to as ‘Agreement’, in the form prior to its amendment by this Amending Protocol, which currently provides for exchange of information upon request limited to conduct constituting tax fraud and the like should be aligned to the OECD standard on transparency and exchange of information in tax matters,
ob upoštevanju, da je treba člen 12 Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Andoro o ukrepih, enakovrednih tistim iz Direktive Sveta 2003/48/ES o obdavčenju dohodka od prihrankov v obliki plačil obresti2 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum), v obliki, kakršna je pred spremembo s tem protokolom o spremembi, ki trenutno zagotavlja izmenjavo podatkov na zaprosilo, omejenih na dejanja, ki predstavljajo davčno goljufijo ali podobno, uskladiti s standardom OECD o preglednosti in izmenjavi podatkov v davčnih zadevah,
Whereas Article 12 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments2, hereinafter referred to as ‘Agreement’, in the form prior to its amendment by this Amending Protocol, which currently provides for exchange of information upon request limited to conduct constituting tax fraud and the like, should be aligned to the OECD standard on transparency and exchange of information in tax matters,
ob upoštevanju, da je treba člen 12 Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Andoro o ukrepih, enakovrednih tistim iz Direktive Sveta 2003/48/ES o obdavčenju dohodka od prihrankov v obliki plačil obresti2 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Sporazum), v obliki, kakršna je pred spremembo s tem protokolom o spremembi, ki trenutno zagotavlja izmenjavo podatkov na zaprosilo, omejenih na dejanja, ki predstavljajo davčno goljufijo ali podobno, uskladiti s standardom OECD o preglednosti in izmenjavi podatkov v davčnih zadevah,
Whereas Article 13 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of San Marino providing for measures equivalent to those laid down in Council Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments2 in the form prior to its amendment by this Amending Protocol, which currently provides for exchange of information upon request limited to conduct constituting tax fraud and the like should be aligned to the OECD standard on transparency and exchange of information in tax matters,
ob upoštevanju, da je treba člen 13 Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Republiko San Marino o ukrepih, enakovrednih tistim iz Direktive Sveta 2003/48/ES o obdavčenju dohodka od prihrankov v obliki plačil obresti2, v obliki, kakršna je pred spremembo s tem protokolom o spremembi, ki trenutno zagotavlja izmenjavo podatkov na zaprosilo, omejenih na dejanja, ki predstavljajo davčno goljufijo ali podobno, uskladiti s standardom OECD o preglednosti in izmenjavi podatkov v davčnih zadevah,
Whereas Article 13(3) of Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 provides that Member States receive a fixed amount of 4000 EUR for each person resettled according to the priorities set out in the Decision, the Common Position foresees an amount of 6000 EUR for each resettled person for those Member States which shall receive the fixed amount from the Fund for the first time and an amount of 5000 EUR for those Member States which have received the fixed amount from the Fund only once before.
Medtem ko je v členu 13(3) Odločbe št. 573/2007/ES o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 določeno, da države članice za vsako ponovno naseljeno osebo v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami, določenimi v Odločbi, prejmejo fiksni znesek v višini 4 000 EUR, pa je v skupnem stališču določeno, da države članice, ki iz sklada prvič prejmejo fiksni znesek, za vsako ponovno naseljeno osebo dobijo 6 000 EUR, tiste, ki so pred tem že enkrat prejele fiksni znesek iz sklada, pa 5 000 EUR.
Whereas both Contracting Parties undertake to implement and uphold the specific data protection safeguards set out in the Agreement resulting from this Amending Protocol, including Annex III thereto, in such a way as to ensure that neither Contracting Party may use any justification to refuse to exchange information with the other,
ob upoštevanju, da sta se pogodbenici zavezali izvajanju in spoštovanju posebnih določb za varstvo podatkov, kakor so vključeni v Sporazum, ki izhaja iz tega protokola o spremembi, vključno z njegovo prilogo III, s čimer se zagotovi, da nobena od njiju ne more upravičeno zavrniti izmenjave informacij z drugo pogodbenico,
Whereas countries such as France earmark some 10% of their rural development budget to help young people set up in agriculture, other countries such as the Netherlands, Malta, Ireland and Slovakia, for various reasons do not have any such measures in place.
Medtem ko države kot je Francija namenijo okoli 10 % proračuna za razvoj podeželja vzpostavitvi kmetijskega gospodarstva mladih, v drugih državah, kot so Nizozemska, Malta, Irska, Slovaška itd., iz različnih razlogov ni ukrepov za spodbujanje takšne vzpostavitve.
Whereas countries such as France earmark some 10% of their rural development budget to help young people set up in agriculture, other countries such as the Netherlands, Malta, Ireland and Slovakia, for various reasons do not have any such measures in place.
Medtem ko države, kot je Francija, okoli 10 % proračuna za razvoj podeželja namenijo vzpostavitvi kmetijske dejavnosti, v drugih državah, kot so Nizozemska, Malta, Irska, Slovaška itd., iz različnih razlogov ni ukrepov na tem področju.
Whereas Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data lays down specific data protection rules which apply also to the exchanges of information covered by this Amending Protocol.
ob upoštevanju, da Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov določa posebna pravila o varstvu podatkov, ki veljajo tudi za izmenjavo informacij iz tega protokola o spremembah,
Whereas Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data3 lays down specific data protection rules in the European Union which also apply to the exchanges of information covered by the Agreement as amended by this Amending Protocol,
ob upoštevanju, da Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov3 določa posebna pravila o varstvu podatkov v Evropski uniji, ki veljajo tudi za izmenjavo informacij iz tega sporazuma, kakor je spremenjen s tem protokolom o spremembi,
Whereas Directive No 64/475/EEC14 and Directive No 72/221/EEC15, which aimed to provide a body of coherent statistics, have not been able to take account of economic and technical changes that have occurred since their adoption and should therefore be repealed;
ker Direktiva št. 64/475/EGS14 in Direktiva št. 72/221/EGS, katerih namen je bil zagotoviti zbirko skladnih statističnih podatkov, nista mogli upoštevati gospodarskih in tehničnih sprememb, ki so nastale od njunega sprejetja in bi ju bilo zato treba razveljaviti;
Whereas general conditions for the use of funding and operation of the RSFF - including eligibility requirements, rules and risk-sharing between institutions - are defined under the Cooperation and Capacity specific programmes of the FP7, detailed measures will be regulated by a bilateral agreement between the European Commission and the EIB, which was signed on 5 June 2007.
Splošni pogoji za uporabo sredstev in delovanje RSFF – vključno s pogoji za upravičenost, pravili in delitvijo tveganja med institucijami – so določeni v okviru programov Sodelovanje in Zmogljivosti iz sedmega okvirnega programa, natančne ukrepe pa določa dvostranski dogovor med Evropsko komisijo in EIB, ki je bil podpisan 5. junija 2007.
Whereas imports comprise 55% of the EU energy mix10, the EU as a whole imports 60% of its gas and over 80% of its oil11, with fast growing competing demand from elsewhere, notably emerging economies.
Čeprav uvoz zajema 55 % energetske mešanice EU10, celotna EU uvaža 60 % plina in več kot 80 % nafte11, hkrati pa se sooča z vedno večjim konkurenčnim povpraševanjem od drugod, zlasti iz hitro rastočih gospodarstev.
Whereas in 2007 employment growth was positive in all EU Member States except Hungary, year-on-year employment growth had weakened markedly in several by mid-2008, and notably in Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Spain, Sweden and the UK.
Medtem ko je bila rast zaposlovanja leta 2007 pozitivna v vseh državah članicah EU, razen na Madžarskem, se je letna rast zaposlovanja v številnih od teh držav, zlasti na Danskem, v Franciji, Nemčiji, Italiji, Litvi, Španiji, na Švedskem in v Združenem kraljestvu sredi leta 2008 občutno zmanjšala.
Whereas in its Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54 (3) (g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies 7 the Council adopted measures to improve the coordination of national provisions concerning the presentation and content of annual accounts and annual reports, the valuation methods used therein and their publication in respect of certain types of company.
ker je Svet v svoji Direktivi 78/660/EGS z dne 25. julija 1978 na podlagi člena 54(3)(g) o letnih računovodskih izkazih nekaterih vrst družb7 sprejel ukrepe za izboljšanje usklajevanja nacionalnih določb o predstavitvi in vsebini letnih računovodskih izkazov in letnih poročil, v njih uporabljenih metod vrednotenja ter njihovo objavo glede na vrsto podjetja;
Whereas in some ports the waste delivery requirement is implemented strictly, in others the competent authorities do not require the delivery of all ship generated waste as foreseen by the Directive, and tend to make an exception for the delivery of sewage, which can be discharged at sea under the operational requirements of MARPOL.
Medtem ko nekatera pristanišča strogo uveljavljajo zahtevo o oddaji odpadkov, pristojni organi v drugih pristaniščih ne zahtevajo oddaje vseh ladijskih odpadkov, kot predvideva Direktiva, in navadno omogočajo izjemo pri oddaji odplak, ki se lahko izpuščajo v morje na podlagi operativnih zahtev konvencije MARPOL.
Whereas it is well-known that Europe needs to invest more in science and innovation, it will also have to coordinate these investments much more smartly than in the past: more than 95 % of national R &amp; D budgets is spent without any coordination across the Union, a formidable potential waste of resources at a time of shrinking funding possibilities.
Sicer je splošno znano, da mora Evropa več vlagati v znanost in inovacije, vendar bo morala te naložbe usklajevati pametneje kot je to počela v preteklosti: več kot 95 % nacionalnih proračunov za raziskave in razvoj v Uniji se porabi brez kakršnega koli usklajevanja, kar je ogromna potencialna potrata sredstev v času vedno manjših možnosti financiranja.
Whereas Law no. 70 of 23 May 19954, devoted to the "Reform of Law no. 27 of 1 March 1983" on Collection, Elaboration and Use of Computerized Personal Data, regulates the protection of personal data in San Marino,
ob upoštevanju, da v San Marinu zaščito osebnih podatkov ureja Zakon št. 70 z dne 23. maja 19954, namenjen „Reformi Zakona št. 27 z dne 1. marca 1983“ o zbiranju, obdelavi in uporabi digitaliziranih osebnih podatkov,
Whereas LGTT targets only transport projects, the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative will be the first EU financial instrument benefiting infrastructure projects across several sectors with similar financing needs and will produce higher benefits in terms of market impact, administrative efficiency and resource utilisation.
Medtem ko je LGTT namenjen zgolj prometnim projektom, bo pobuda za projektne obveznice Evropa 2020 prvi finančni instrument EU, ki se bo uporabljal za infrastrukturne projekte v več sektorjih s podobnimi potrebami po financiranju ter bo ugodneje vplival na trg, upravno učinkovitost in uporabo virov.
Whereas Liechtenstein has implemented Directive 95/46/EC by means of the Data Protection Act of 14 March 2002;
ob upoštevanju, da je Lihtenštajn Direktivo 95/46/ES uvedel z zakonom o varstvu podatkov z dne 14. marca 2002,
Whereas Liechtenstein joined the European Economic Area (EEA) in 1995;
ob upoštevanju, da se je Lihtenštajn pridružil Evropskemu gospodarskemu prostoru (EGP) leta 1995;
Whereas on the date of signing of this Amending Protocol the European Commission has not yet adopted a decision pursuant to Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC finding that the Principality of Monaco offers an adequate level of protection of personal data,
ob upoštevanju, da Evropska komisija na datum podpisa tega protokola o spremembi ni sprejela sklepa v skladu s členom 25(6) Direktive 95/46/ES, s katerim bi ugotovila, da Kneževina Monako zagotavlja ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov,
Whereas option C2 will have no influence on unleaded petrol excise duties, C1 and C2+ will lead to an increase in unleaded petrol excise duty in 9 Member States, from 2016 (C1) and 2014 (C2+).
Medtem ko možnost C2 ne bo vplivala na trošarine za neosvinčeni bencin, bosta možnosti C1 in C2+ od leta 2016 (C1) in 2014 (C2+) povzročili povečanje trošarin za neosvinčeni bencin v 9 državah članicah.