natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mr Edgardo Maria Iozia (IT- II)
Edgardo Maria IOZIA (IT-II)
Mr ERIKSSON
g. ERIKSSON
Mr Felisati (IT-I)
g. FELISATI (IT-I)
Mr Fornea (II-RO)
g. Fornea (II-RO)
Mr Fornea (RO-II)
g. FORNEA (RO-II)
Mr Fornea spoke in the debate, arguing that it was important to resolve the visa issue, and to negotiate with Canada on the mining sector.
Fornea, ki je opozoril, da je treba rešiti vprašanje vizumov in da se je treba pogajati s Kanado o rudarskem sektorju.
Mr Frerichs also spoke.
Frerichs.
Mr Frerichs presided.
FRERICHS.
Mr Garriga Polledo (ES-Cat.1)
Salvador GARRIGA POLLEDO (ES – 1. kat.)
Mr Gendre (FR-II)
g. GENDRE (FR-II)
Mr Gibellieri (IT-Cat.2)
Enrico GIBELLIERI (IT – 2. kat.)
Mr Gibellieri (IT-Cat.2)
Enrico GIBELLIERI (IT-2. kat.)
Mr Gobiņš and Mr Cedrone participated in the ensuing general debate.
Sledila je splošna razprava, v kateri sta sodelovala g. GOBIŅŠ in g.
Mr Gobiņš asked the rapporteurs for their views on the recently adopted EU budgetary framework.
GOBIŅŠ je poročevalce vprašal, kakšno je njihovo stališče o nedavno sprejetem proračunskem okviru EU.
Mr Guerini congratulated the rapporteur and added that in view of the complexity of the subject, he had done an outstanding job.
GUERINI se je zahvalil poročevalcu in dodal, da je glede na kompleksnost tematike opravil izjemno delo.
Mr Gustav ZÖHRER (Gr.
Gustav ZÖHRER (II. sk.-AT)
Mr Guérin (for the rapporteur)
Serge GUÉRIN (za poročevalca)
Mr Hadjiysky (I-BG)
g. Hadjiysky (I-BG)
Mr Halas
g. HALAS
Mr Hamro-Drotz hoped that there would be a policy discussion on the importance of own-initiative opinions in the area of external relations during a forthcoming Bureau meeting, in order to properly prepare the decisions on own-initiative opinions that would have to be taken in January 2009.
HAMRO-DROTZ je izrazil željo, da se na eni izmed naslednjih sej začne načelna razprava o pomenu mnenj na lastno pobudo na področju zunanjih odnosov, da bi bili sklepi o začetku priprave mnenj na lastno pobudo, ki jih je treba sprejeti januarja 2009, dobro pripravljeni.
Mr Hamro-Drotz noted that it was important not to give the impression that the Committee had unconditionally supported the aim of increasing the level of emissions reduction to 30%.
HAMRO-DROTZ je povedal, da ne bi smeli dajati vtisa, da je Odbor brezpogojno podprl cilj povečati raven zmanjšanja emisij na 30 %.
Mr Hamro‑Drotz answered by stressing that the REX section was fully aware of the need for this kind of synergy.
HAMRO-DROTZ mu je odgovoril, da se v strokovni skupini REX popolnoma zavedajo potrebe po tovrstni sinergiji.
Mr Hansen then spoke, highlighting the problem of youth unemployment.
HANSEN je poudaril problem brezposelnosti med mladimi, g.
Mr HAYDER, Head of the President’s private office
HAYDER, vodja kabineta predsednika
Mr Hernàndez Bataller informed the meeting that the opinion had been adopted by the section on 14 November 2006 by 41 votes in favour, three against and three abstentions.
Predsednik je sporočil, da je 14. novembra 2006 strokovna skupina mnenje sprejela z večino, in sicer z 41 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi.
Mr Hernández Bataller and Ms Sirkeinen took part in the ensuing debate.
Sledila je razprava, v kateri sta sodelovala g.
Mr Hernández Bataller answered that the first two paragraphs of Part D in his document set out the specific aspects of the mandate provided by the Bureau, whereas the aspects relating to the Lisbon Treaty had been taken into account at a later stage at the request of the Bureau, which had not at this stage provided further details.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je odgovoril, da se prvi dve točki dela D njegovega dokumenta nanašata na specifične elemente mandata, ki ga je dodelilo predsedstvo, točka v zvezi z Lizbonsko pogodbo pa je bila upoštevana pozneje na zahtevo predsedstva, ki še ni predložilo podrobnih informacij.
Mr Hernández Bataller pointed out that the EESC had been behind the drafting of the Charter and should not give up the option of referring to it at a time when the treaties had just made it legally binding.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je dejal, da se Odbor, ki je sodeloval pri pripravi Listine, ne sme odpovedati možnosti, da bi jo navajal, saj je s Pogodbama postala pravno zavezujoča.
Mr Hernández Bataller replied that this matter did not fall within the panel's remit and a formal proposal was the way to approach it.
G. HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER mu je odgovoril, da to vprašanje ne sodi v pristojnost komisije za poslovnik in da je za obravnavo potreben uraden predlog.
Mr Hernández Bataller stressed the importance of transparency and involving members in budget management, while highlighting the need to clarify the responsibilities of the budget group.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER je vztrajal na pomenu preglednosti in udeležbe članov pri upravljanju proračuna ter poudaril, da je treba bolj natančno opredeliti pristojnosti skupine za proračun; in g.
Mr Hernández Bataller took note of the opposition of most panel members to the proposed wording, and suggested that the discussion of that point stop there.
HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER se je seznanil z dejstvom, da večina članov komisije nasprotuje predlaganemu besedilu, zato je na koncu predlagal, da bi zaključili razpravo o tem.
Mr Hernández Bataller, rapporteur-general for the opinion, agreed with this proposal, as did the other two group presidents.
G. HERNÁNDEZ BATALLER, glavni poročevalec za to mnenje, je predlog podprl, pridružila sta se mu tudi oba druga predsednika skupin.
Mr Hoffelt (BE-III)
g. HOFFELT (BE-III)
Mr Hrovatič (SL-III)
Igor HROVATIČ (SI-III)
Mr Huvelin spoke in the general discussion.
V splošni razpravi je spregovoril Bernard Huvelin.
Mr Iozia (II-IT)
IOZIA (II-IT)
Mr Iozia (IT-II) (Rule 62 - Ms Polverini)
g. Iozia (IT-II) (člen 62 ga. Polverini)
Mr Iozia (IT-II) (Rule 62 Ms Polverini)
g. IOZIA (IT-II) (člen 62 – ga. POLVERINI)
Mr Iozia stressed the importance of setting up an agency to provide a regulatory framework in 27 countries.
Ustanovitev te agencije bi bila izredno pomembna za zagotovitev pravnega okvira v 27 državah.
Mr Iuliano (IT-II)
g. IULIANO (IT-II)
Mr Ivașcu (RO-III)
Mihai IVAȘCU (RO – III. sk.)
Mr Jahier (IT-III)
g. JAHIER (IT-III)
Mr Jahier agreed, recalling the agreements reached at the time the EESC had acquired the JDE building on the use of European Parliament premises.
JAHIER se je pridružil temu mnenju in opozoril na dogovore, ki jih je EESO sklenil pri nakupu stavbe JDE v zvezi z uporabo prostorov Evropskega parlamenta.
Mr Jahier also felt that, although the document submitted to the Bureau was of high quality, it did not provide an overall vision and that, therefore, no decision could be taken on this basis at this stage.
Luca JAHIER je podobno menil, da je dokument, ki ga je prejelo predsedstvo, sicer dobro pripravljen, vendar pa še vedno ne vsebuje globalne vizije, zato je ocenil, da v tej fazi na tej podlagi ne more biti sprejeta nobena odločitev.
Mr Jahier deplored the growing gap between the EU and its citizens and noted that the work programme presented made no mention of Article 11 on participatory democracy.
JAHIER je izrazil obžalovanje nad vse večjim razkorakom med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državljani ter pripomnil, da v predstavljenem delovnem programu ni omenjen člen 11 o participativni demokraciji.
Mr Jahier explained that Group III had not yet examined the issue given the lack of a document containing a proposal, and also because it did not expect to request additional funds with regard to the 2012 budget.
JAHIER, ki je povedal, da III. skupina še ni preučila tega vprašanja, ker ni imela na voljo dokumenta s predlogom in ker predvideva, da ne bo zahtevala dodatnih sredstev v okviru proračuna za leto 2012, g.
Mr Jahier joined them in congratulating Ms Darmanin, particularly with regard to youth-oriented activities, which should be further developed by new initiatives geared to university students.
JAHIER, ki je prav tako čestital ge. DARMANIN, zlasti za dejavnosti, namenjene mladim, ki bi jih bilo primerno nadgraditi z novimi pobudami, namenjenimi univerzitetnim študentom.
Mr Jahier noted that the proposal had been unanimously approved at Group III's meeting and also stressed that this initiative should be formalised as soon as possible.
Luca JAHIER je spomnil, da je bil ta predlog soglasno sprejet na seji III. skupine, ter izjavil, da se tudi sam zavzema za čimprejšnjo uresničitev te pobude.
Mr Jahier observed that the debate on people with disabilities was no longer on the agenda for the next plenary session and wondered when it would take place.
Luca JAHIER je pripomnil, da razprave o invalidih ni več na dnevnem redu naslednjega plenarnega zasedanja, in vprašal, kdaj na bi ta razprava bila.
Mr Jahier particularly stressed that the EESC's contribution should be preliminary and brief in nature, as the next stage in the work was the responsibility of the parliamentary committee.
Luca JAHIER je še posebej poudaril, da bi moral biti prispevek EESO pripravljen kot predhoden dokument in kot povzetek, nadaljnje delo pa bi moral opraviti odbor EP.
Mr Jahier questioned the follow-up given to the CAF exercise, and wondered whether the breakdown of staff could perhaps also be opened up to civil society organisation representation.
Poleg tega se je Luca JAHIER spraševal o spremljanju izvajanja skupnega ocenjevalnega okvira (CAF) in o tem, ali bi bila lahko struktura osebja odprta tudi za predstavnike organizacij civilne družbe.
Mr Jahier raised his opposition to such a proposal, by asking that any potential reservations over the creation of this new body be made explicit.
G. JAHIER je izrazil nasprotovanje temu predlogu in pozval k izrecni opredelitvi morebitnih zadržkov glede ustanovitve tega novega telesa.
Mr Jahier recommended that the links with the British people should be renewed.
Luca JAHIER je predlagal, da se ohranijo vezi z Britanci.
Mr Jahier responded by referring to his pledge, following the discussion at the last Bureau meeting two weeks ago, to present the method, substance and timetable of the work proposed.
JAHIER in spomnil na svojo obljubo, da bo na podlagi razprave na zadnji seji predsedstva, ki je bila pred štirinajstimi dnevi, predložil načrt z metodo in vsebino predlagane dejavnosti ter njen časovni razpored.
Mr Jahier suggested holding a political debate at the 15 January Bureau meeting to prepare for the debate with European Council President Mr van Rompuy at the 16 and 17 January plenary session.
JAHIER je vprašal, ali bo na seji predsedstva 15. januarja organizirana pripravljalna politična razprava, s katero bi bolje opredelili okvir razprave z g. van ROMPUYEM, predsednikom Evropskega sveta, ki je predvidena za plenarno zasedanje 16. in 17. januarja.
Mr Jahier supported re-activating the discussion opened by the president of the Budget Group and looking more closely at the agency's work, while mentioning the disadvantages that would result from no longer having an agency on the Committee's premises.
JAHIER, ki je podprl vnovično razpravo, ki jo je začel predsednik skupine za proračun, in natančnejšo preučitev dela agencije, hkrati pa izpostavil pomanjkljivosti tega, da se opusti agencija v stavbi Odbora, g.
Mr Jahier then spoke to express regret at the short memory the EESC had of its past achievements in the field of policy evaluation.
Zatem je razpravljal Luca JAHIER, ki obžaluje, da se EESO tako slabo spominja svojih preteklih dosežkov na področju ocenjevanja politik.
Mr Jahier then thanked them for their good work and clarified that the document was designed to evolve as the situation to which it related developed; Mr Krawczyk commented that the document represented the way forward for dealing with such a complex matter; Mr Lobo Xavier said that the proposal demonstrated the Committee's ability to propose concrete solutions; and Ms Bischoff stated that the Committee needed to develop a strategy and continue to be active on the issue, promoting solutions at European level.
Razpravo so nadaljevali Luca JAHIER, ki se je kolegom zahvalil za dobro opravljeno delo in dejal, da naj bi se ta dokument spreminjal glede na spreminjajoče se razmere na obravnavanem področju, Jacek KRAWCZYK, ki je menil, da ta dokument predstavlja korak naprej pri obravnavi tega izredno zapletenega vprašanja, Gonçalo LOBO XAVIER, ki je povedal, da je predlog dokaz, da je Odbor sposoben predlagati konkretne rešitve, ter Gabriele BISCHOFF, ki je poudarila, da bi Odbor moral oblikovati strategijo in biti še naprej aktiven na tem področju, tako da bi spodbujal rešitve na evropski ravni.
Mr Jahier then took the floor, welcoming the fact that, for the first time in many years, it was possible to have an in-depth discussion on the human resources situation.
Nato je Luca JAHIER izrazil zadovoljstvo, da lahko prvič po več letih poteka podrobna razprava o stanju na kadrovskem področju.
Mr Jahier then turned to a memo drafted in collaboration with the two Group presidents that could serve as a starting point for the work, to which would be added important points from the opinions the Committee had adopted in the last year, as well as others soon to be adopted.
JAHIER je nato omenil obvestilo, pripravljeno v sodelovanju z obema predsednikoma skupin, ki bi lahko služilo kot izhodišče za delo, vendar bo dopolnjeno s pomembnejšimi elementi iz mnenj, ki jih je Odbor sprejel v zadnjem letu, in drugih, ki jih bo sprejel v prihodnje.
Mr Jahier took the floor and commented on the Bureau's decisions on the political monitoring of the exercise, stating that there was a need to follow up the CAF's recommendations, based on a list of priorities and under the watchful eye of a group of members appointed by the Bureau.
Luca JAHIER je znova opozoril na sklepe predsedstva o političnem usmerjanju izvajanja skupnega ocenjevalnega okvira in dejal, da je treba upoštevati priporočila za skupni ocenjevalni okvir, in sicer na podlagi seznama prednostnih nalog in pod nadzorom skupine članov, ki jih imenuje predsedstvo.
Mr Jahier welcomed the overall positive tone of the EP decision, while agreeing with the comments made by the previous two speakers.
JAHIER, ki je pozdravil večinoma pohvalne pripombe v sklepu Parlamenta in se strinjal s pripombami predhodnih govornikov, g.
Mr Jasiński (PL-II)
PEGADO LIZ (PT-III)
Mr Jean-François Courbe (for the rapporteur)
Jean-François COURBE (za poročevalca)
Mr Jean-Paul Léglise (for the rapporteur)
Jean-Paul LEGLISE (za poročevalca)
Mr Kallio (FI-III)
g. KALLIO (FI-III)
Mr Kallio described the steps required to balance the books at the end of the financial year and obtain the release by the budgetary authority of the EUR 1 million reserve established at the European Parliament's first reading of the budget: the reform of the members' financial statute needed to be finalised and the financial planning system implemented by Spring 2009 to gain the confidence of the budgetary authority.
KALLIO je opisal potrebne korake za uravnotežen zaključek proračunskega leta in za dosego tega, da bi proračunski organ odobril sprostitev rezerve v višini milijon eurov, ki je bila predvidena v prvem branju: da bi pridobili zaupanje proračunskega organa, je treba do pomladi 2009 dokončati reformo finančnega statuta članov ter izpopolniti sistem za finančno načrtovanje.
Mr Kirschen (Rule 62 - Iozia) (IT-II)
M. Iozia, člen 62) (IT-II)
Mr Kittenis (CY-II)
g. KITTENIS (CY-II)
Mr Kittenis spoke about the accuracy of the data in the schedule of section meetings.
KITTENIS pa je spregovoril o točnosti podatkov v časovnem razporedu sej strokovnih skupin.
Mr Kleeman draw attention to point 6.21, which emphasised the importance of training and schooling.
Prvi je opozoril na točko 6.21, ki poudarja pomen izobraževanja in šolanja.
Mr Kleeman pointed out that Romania's accession might only take place in 2008.
Kleemann je opozoril, da bi morala Romunija pristopiti k EU šele leta 2008. Ga.
Mr Koos Nijgh (for Group III)
Koos NIJGH (za III. skupino)
Mr Krawczyck expressed his appreciation for the work done by Mr Palmieri in order to obtain the discharge.
Jacek KRAWCZYCK se je zahvalil Stefanu PALMIERIJU za prizadevanja, ki jih je vložil v pridobitev razrešnice.
Mr Krawczyk (Gr.
Za podpredsednika sta bila izvoljena g.
Mr Krawczyk also noted that the quality indicators used did not include any criteria based on member satisfaction.
Jacek KRAWCZYK je prav tako opozoril, da med uporabljenimi kazalniki kakovosti ni meril, ki temeljijo na zadovoljstvu članov.
Mr Krawczyk also said he was confident of the outcome of the negotiations ahead.
KRAWCZYK je prav tako izrazil pričakovanje o zaključku prihodnjih upravnih pogajanj.
Mr Krawczyk also spoke to stress the importance of the opinion on the new Commission proposal on the Connecting Europe Facility (COM(2011) 665 final), classed as B+.
KRAWCZYK, ki je poudaril pomen mnenja o novem predlogu Komisije o instrumentu za povezovanje Evrope (COM(2011) 665 konč.), ki je bilo uvrščeno v kategorijo B+.
Mr Krawczyk also spoke, urging that the draft letter be immediately put to the vote.
KRAWCZYK je predlagal, da se osnutek besedila takoj predloži v glasovanje.
Mr Krawczyk gave the gist of a discussion at the Group I meeting that concluded there was a need to re-examine the working methods and running of the Committee by quickly setting up a task force on the matter so that all the members could discuss it.
KRAWCZYK je povzel razpravo na seji I. skupine, ki je pokazala, da je treba ponovno proučiti metode dela in delovanje Odbora in hitro ustanoviti skupina za razmislek, v katerem bi lahko sodelovali vsi člani.
Mr Krawczyk recalled that the purpose of an audit, whether external or internal, was to guarantee optimal budget management.
KRAWCZYK, ki je spomnil, da je cilj revizije, notranje ali zunanje, zagotoviti optimalno vodenje proračuna.
Mr Krawczyk stressed that the AFCO initiative was a challenge.
G. KRAWCZYK je poudaril velik pomen pobude Odbora AFCO za EESO.
Mr Krawczyk then read out the amendments accepted before the start of the meeting comparing them to the initial text of the memo circulated in written format and added that these changes had been adopted after wide-ranging consultation.
Krawczyk je nato prebral spremenjene dele prvotnega besedila obvestila, razdeljenega v pisni obliki, ki so bili sprejeti pred začetkom zasedanja, in dodal, da so bile te spremembe sprejete po obširnem posvetovanju.
Mr Krawczyk then reiterated his proposal that the section secretariats attend discussions in the Budget Group on the approval of requests so that they could provide the necessary information when called upon.
Jacek KRAWCZYK je nato ponovil svoj predlog, da bi se razprav o potrjevanju zahtevkov v skupini za proračun udeležili tudi predstavniki tajništev strokovnih skupin, da bi lahko posredovali potrebna pojasnila, če se jih zahteva.
Mr Krawczyk took the floor to ask whether the European Commissioner for Transport, Ms Bulc, might participate in one of the upcoming plenary sessions.
Jacek KRAWCZYK je izrazil željo, da bi se enega od naslednjih plenarnih zasedanj udeležila evropska komisarka za promet Violeta BULC.
Mr Krawczyk took to the floor to suggest that, given the large number of amendments submitted to opinion REX/463 and the importance of the issue (security and foreign policy), the opinion should be referred back to the section for a more in-depth debate.
Jacek KRAWCZYK je predlagal, da se mnenje REX/463 glede na veliko število sprememb, ki so bile predlagane v zvezi z njim, in glede na pomembnost argumenta (zunanja varnost in politika) ponovno pošlje strokovni skupini za bolj poglobljeno razpravo.
Mr Krawczyk urged that, next year, an estimate should be submitted to the budget group before making the expenditure.
KRAWCZYK je priporočal, da se naslednje leto pred kakršnimi koli izdatki skupini za proračun pošlje ocena stroškov.
Mr Krawczyk, Ms Bischoff and Mr Jahier took the floor to welcome the decision.
Jacek KRAWCZYK, Gabriele BISCHOFF in Luca JAHIER so pozdravili ta sklep.
Mr Krzaklewski (PL-II) (Rule 62 - Mr Szynaka)
g. Krzaklewski (PL-II) (člen 62 – g.
Mr Krzaklewski (PL-II) (Rule 62 – Mr Szynaka)
g. KRZAKLEWSKI (PL-II) (člen 62 – g SZYNAKA)
Mr Krzaklewski pointed out the lack of international consensus on climate change policy and the possibility of the isolation of the EU in its efforts to achieve the low carbon energy system.
KRZAKLEWSKI je opozoril na pomanjkanje mednarodnega soglasja glede politike podnebnih sprememb in možnost, da bo EU ostala sama v svojih prizadevanjih za dosego nizkoogljičnega energetskega sistema.
Mr Krzaklewski suggested removing the reference to Finland, while adopting the rest of the amendment, since the Nord Stream posed a genuine threat to the Polish port of Świnoujście, which was due to be developed into the biggest European terminal for liquefied natural gas from Norway.
G. KRZAKLEWSKI je predlagal, da se črta sklicevanje na Finsko, da pa se sprejme preostali del amandmaja, ker je plinovod Nord Stream resnična grožnja za poljsko pristanišče Świnoujście, ki naj bi postalo največje evropsko prekladališče za utekočinjeni zemeljski plin iz Norveške.
Mr Krīgers (LV-II)
g. KRĪGERS (LV-II)
Mr Ladrille (BE-II)
g. LADRILLE (BE-II)
Mr Lagerholm, for his part, regretted that the opinion failed to address the issue of the expected competition in the raw materials sector.
LAGERHOLM je izrazil obžalovanje, ker se mnenje ne loteva vprašanja konkurence, ki jo je mogoče pričakovati v sektorju surovin.
Mr Leirião (PT-Cat.3)
José CUSTÓDIO LEIRIÃO (PT-3. kat.)
Mr Lennert
Christoph LENNERT
Mr LINDVALD-NIELSEN
g. LINDVALD-NIELSEN
Mr Lobo Xavier responded by pointing out that such measures had already been taken.
Gonçalo LOBO XAVIER mu je odvrnil, da so bili koraki v tej smeri že narejeni.
Mr Lustenhouwer clarified that he agreed to specify in his proposal that the bureau members would have to come from 6 different Member States and added that he would not want any former group membership reflected there, as the association was not a copy of the EESC structure.
Lustenhouwer je pojasnil, da bo v svojem predlogu dodal klavzulo, da morajo biti člani predsedstva iz šestih različnih držav članic, in dodal, da ne želi, da se v predsedstvu odraža nekdanje članstvo v skupinah, saj združenje ni kopija strukture EESO.
Mr Lustenhouwer pointed out that the secretariat had already contacted all former members about this issue, and he encouraged those present to pay their membership fee.
Lustenhouwer je poudaril, da je tajništvo glede tega že stopilo v stik z vsemi nekdanjimi člani, in prisotne spodbudil, naj plačajo članarino.
Mr Malosse and Mr Wilms, who was responsible for financial matters, were open to possible solutions.
Wilms sta izrazila pripravljenost za iskanje morebitnih rešitev.
Mr Malosse asked for the opinion on public procurement (INT/290) to be removed from the agenda so it could be redrafted.
MALOSSE je zahteval, da se mnenje o javnih naročilih (INT/290) umakne z dnevnega reda, ker ga je treba predelati.
Mr Malosse drew attention to Rule 10 of the Rules of Procedure, detailing the Budget Group's role in monitoring compliance with the principles of sound management of financial resources, and thus felt that that comments made in the report were perfectly legitimate.
MALOSSE je opozoril na člen 10 poslovnika, ki podrobno opisuje vlogo skupine za proračun pri nadzoru upoštevanja načela dobrega upravljanja finančnih virov, in menil, da so pripombe v poročilu popolnoma legitimne.
Mr Malosse endorsed the idea of asking an external body or institution such as the European Parliament to audit past budget management, while recalling that the 2010 budget should mark a new turn in budget governance.
MALOSSE je odobraval načrt, da bi za revizijo preteklega upravljanja proračuna zadolžili zunanji organ ali institucijo kot npr. Evropski parlament, pri čemer je opozoril, da bi moral proračun za leto 2010 pomeniti prelom na področju proračunskega upravljanja.
Mr Malosse highlighted the need to clarify the concept of institutional obligations, and even whether it had any merit, in view of the corresponding reallocation of appropriations in line with the needs of Committee bodies.
Henri MALOSSE je poudaril, da je treba pojasniti pojem "institucionalne obveznosti" in celo njegovo upravičenost, in sicer zaradi prerazporeditve tozadevnih odobritev glede na potrebe organov Odbora.