natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the case-law of the ECtHR has clarified that persons being questioned in relation to offences, whether or not formally charged, should be covered by Article 6 ECHR, persons arrested or detained in connection with a criminal charge also come within the ambit of this provision.
Ker je sodna praksa ESČP razjasnila, da osebe, ki se jih zasliši v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji, ne glede na to, ali so uradno obtožene, varuje člen 6 EKČP, ta določba prav tako zajema osebe, ki se jim odvzame prostost ali se jih pridrži v zvezi z obtožbo kaznivega dejanja.
Since the collapse in demand at that time was still regarded as a purely cyclical phenomenon, capacity was maintained despite crisis measures.
Since the collapse in demand at that time was still regarded as a purely cyclical phenomenon, capacity was maintained despite crisis measures. &lt; }0{ &gt; Ker se je na tedanji nenadni upad povpraševanja še vedno gledalo zgolj kot na cikličen pojav, so se kljub kriznim ukrepom zmogljivosti ohranjale.
Since the Committee already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CES 1031/2013 – 2012/0364 (COD), adopted on 20 March 2013, it has decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it took in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES 1031/2013 – 2012/0364 (COD), sprejetem 20. marca 2013, zato je sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee endorsed the content of the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Ker se je Odbor strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorsed the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 465th plenary session of 15 and 16 September 2010 (meeting of 15 September 2010), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 465. plenarnem zasedanju 15. in 16. septembra 2010 (seja z dne 15. septembra) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 465th plenary session of 15 and 16 September 2010 (meeting of 15 September), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 465. plenarnem zasedanju 15. in 16. septembra 2010 (seja z dne 15. septembra) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 465th plenary session of 15 and 16 September 2010 (meeting of 15 September), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 465. plenarnem zasedanju 15. in 16. septembra 2010 (seja z dne 15. septembra) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 464th plenary session of 14 and 15 July 2010 (meeting of 14 July 2010), by 163 votes to 1 with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 464. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. julija 2010 (seja z dne 14. julija) s 163 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 476th plenary session of 7 and 8 December 2011 (meeting of 7 December), by 177 votes with 11 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 476. plenarnem zasedanju 7. in 8. decembra 2011 (seja z dne 7. decembra) s 177 glasovi za in 11 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1022/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1022/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1025/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1025/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1294/2012, adopted on 23 May 2012*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 1294/2012, sprejetem 23. maja 2012*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 582/2003, adopted on 14 May 2003*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 582/2003, sprejetem 14. maja 2003*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 794/2011 – 2010/0373 (COD), adopted on 5 May 2011*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 794/2011 – 2010/0373 (COD), sprejetem 5. maja 2011*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 794/2011 – 2010/0373 (COD), adopted on 5 May 2011, it has decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 794/2011 – 2010/0373 (COD), sprejetem 5. maja 2011, zato je sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje in zavzeti enako stališče kot v zgoraj navedenem dokumentu.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 966/2010, adopted on 14 July 2010*, it decided, at its 496th plenary session (meeting of 26 February 2014), by 224 votes to 4 with 13 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 966/2010, sprejetem 14. julija 2010*, zato je na 496. plenarnem zasedanju 26. in 27. februarja 2014 (seja z dne 26. februarja) z 224 glasovi za, 4 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 966/2010, adopted on 14 July 2010*, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 966/2010, sprejetem 14. julija 2010*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 469th plenary session of 16 and 17 February 2011 (meeting of 16 February 2011), by 128 votes and one abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 469. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. februarja 2011 (seja z dne 16. februarja) s 128 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 477th plenary session of 18 and 19 January 2012 (meeting of 18 January 2012), by 171 votes with 14 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 477. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. januarja 2012 (seja z dne 18. januarja) s 171 glasovi za in 14 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 478th plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2012 (meeting of 22 February 2012), by 130 votes with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Ker se je Odbor strinjal z vsebino predloga, je na 478. plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. februarja 2012 (seja z dne 22. februarja) s 130 glasovi za in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 478th plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2012 (meeting of 22 February 2012), by 130 votes with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 478. plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. februarja 2012 (seja z dne 22. februarja) s 130 glasovi za in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September), by … votes to … with … abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 483. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. septembra 2012 (seja z dne 18. septembra) s/z … glasovi za, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 143 votes to 3 with 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 143 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 150 votes to 1 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 150 glasovi za, 1 glasom proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by … votes to … with … abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s/z … glasovi za, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), with 151 votes in favour and 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 151 glasovi za, in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its … plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2012 (meeting of 22 February 2012), by … votes to … with … abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na ... plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. februarja 2012 (seja z dne 22. februarja) s/z … glasovi za, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposals and feels that it requires no comments on its part, it decided, at its 492nd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2013 (meeting of 18 September 2013), by 170 votes to 6 with 12 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 492. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. septembra 2013 (seja z dne 18. septembra) s 170 glasovi za, 6 glasovi proti in 12 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposals and feels that it requires no comments on its part, it decided, at its 493rd plenary session of 16 and 17 October 2013 (meeting of 16 October 2013), by 149 votes to 3 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 493. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. oktobra 2013 (seja z dne 16. oktobra) s 149 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposals and feels that it requires no comments on its part, it decided, at its 493rd plenary session of 16 and 17 October 2013 (meeting of 16 October 2013), by 149 votes to 3 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 493. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. oktobra 2013 (seja z dne 16. oktobra) s 149 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposals and feels that it requires no comments on its part, it decided, at its 493rd plenary session of 16 and 17 October 2013 (meeting of 16 October 2013), by … votes to … with … abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 493. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. oktobra 2013 (seja z dne 16. oktobra) s/z … glasovi za, … glasovi proti in … vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 458th plenary session, held on 16 and 17 December 2009 (meeting of 16 December 2009), by 178 votes in favour and 4 abstentions to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 458. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. decembra 2009 (seja z dne 16. decembra) s 178 glasovi za in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 461st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 March 2010 (meeting of 17 March 2010), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nikakršnih pripomb, zato je na 461. plenarnem zasedanju 17. in 18. marca 2010 (seja z dne 17. marca) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 461st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 March 2010 (meeting of 17 March 2010), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 461. plenarnem zasedanju 17. in 18. marca 2010 (seja z dne 17. marca) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 461st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 March 2010 (meeting of 17 March 2010), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 461. plenarnem zasedanju 17. in 18. marca 2010 (seja z dne 17. marca) soglasno o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 461st plenary session, held on 17 and 18 March 2010 (meeting of 17 March 2010), unanimously to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 461. plenarnem zasedanju 17. in 18. marca 2010 (seja z dne 17. marca 2010) soglasno o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinions CES 807/2000 and CESE 1360/2002, adopted on 13 July 2000* and on 11 December 2002**, it decided unanimously, at its 465th plenary session of 15 and 16 September 2010 (meeting of 15 September), to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojih prejšnjih mnenjih CES 807/2000 in CESE 1360/2002, sprejetih 13. julija 2000* in 11. decembra 2002**, zato je na 465. plenarnem zasedanju 15. in 16. septembra 2010 (seja z dne 15. septembra) o tem predlogu soglasno sprejel pozitivno mnenje in zavzel isto stališče kot v zgoraj navedenem dokumentu.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 157 votes to 2 with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 157 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December 2012) by 129 votes, with 1 abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 485. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2012 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 129 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 479th plenary session of 28 and 29 March 2012 (meeting of 28 March 2012), by 158 votes to 2 with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 479. plenarnem zasedanju 28. in 29. marca 2012 (seja z dne 28. marca) s 158 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 481st plenary session of 23 and 24 May 2012 (meeting of 23 May 2012), by 159 votes with 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 481. plenarnem zasedanju 23. in 24. maja 2012 (seja z dne 23. maja) s 159 glasovi za in 7 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September), by 145 votes to 3 with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 483. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. septembra 2012 (seja z dne 18. septembra) s 145 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September 2012), by 148 votes to 5 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 483. plenarnem zasedanju 18. in 19. septembra 2012 (seja z dne 18. septembra) s 148 glasovi za, petimi glasovi proti in šestimi vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 156 votes to 3 with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 484. plenarnem zasedanju 14. in 15. novembra 2012 (seja z dne 14. novembra) s 156 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December), by 127 votes to 2 with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 485. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2012 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 127 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December), by 129 votes with 1 abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se strinja z vsebino predloga, zato je na 485. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2012 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 129 glasovi za in 1 vzdržanim glasom sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in opinion CESE 1022/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009*, it decided at its … plenary session, held on …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1022/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee had already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in opinion CESE 1025/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009*, it decided at its … plenary session, held on …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1025/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in its opinion CESE 493/2008, adopted on 12 March 2008*, it decided, at its 489th plenary session of 17 and 18 April 2013 (meeting of 17 April 2013), by 178 votes to 3 with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion referring to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 493/2008, sprejetem 12. marca 2008*, zato je na 489. plenarnem zasedanju 17. in 18. aprila 2013 (seja z dne 17. aprila) s 178 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil pripraviti mnenje, v katerem bo zgolj opozoril na stališče, izraženo v navedenem mnenju.