natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CES-6207-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 16 October 2013*, it decided, at its 497th plenary session of 25 and 26 March 2014 (meeting of 25 March), by 127 votes to 7 with 13 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES6207-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 16. oktobra 2013*, zato je na 497. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. marca 2014 (seja z dne 25. marca) s 127 glasovi za, 7 glasovi proti in 13 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 1573/2012, adopted on 12 July 2012, it decided not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1573/2012, sprejetem 12. julija 2012, zato je sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 493/2008, adopted on 12 March 2008*, it decided, at its 489th plenary session of 17 and 18 April 2013 (meeting of 17 April 2013), by 178 votes to 3 with 10 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 493/2008, sprejetem 12. marca 2008*, zato je na 489. plenarnem zasedanju 17. in 18. aprila 2013 (seja z dne 17. aprila) s 178 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 10 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v navedenem mnenju.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES 4014-2013_00_00_AC, adopted on 16 October 2013* and CES 1334/88 adopted on 14 December 1988**, it decided, at its 497th plenary session of 25 and 26 March 2014 (meeting of 25 March), by 135 votes to 3 with 17 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES4014-2013_00_00_AC, sprejetem 16. oktobra 2013*, in mnenju CES 1334/88, sprejetem 14. decembra 1988**, zato je na 497. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. marca 2014 (seja z dne 25. marca) s 135 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 17 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 22 May 2013*, EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, adopted on 5 June 2014** and EESC-2015-02052-00-00-AC-TRA, adopted on 22 April 2016***, it decided, at its 517th plenary session of 25 and 26 May 2016 (meeting of 25 May), by …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES2942-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 22. maja 2013*, mnenju EESC-2014-02897-00-00-AC, sprejetem 4. junija 2014**, in mnenju EESC-2015-02052-00-00-AC-TRA, sprejetem 22. aprila 2015***, zato je na 517. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. maja 2016 (seja z dne 25. maja) s/z
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES4014-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 16 October 2013* and CES 1331/88, adopted on 14 December 1988**, it decided, at its 497th plenary session of 25 and 26 March 2014 (meeting of 25 March), by 139 votes to 3 with 17 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES4014-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 16. oktobra 2013*, in mnenju CES 1331/88, sprejetem 14. decembra 1988**, zato je na 497. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. marca 2014 (seja z dne 25. marca) s 139 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 17 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the content of the proposal in question in its opinions CES4014-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, adopted on 16 October 2013* and CES 1331/88, adopted on 14 December 1988**, it decided, at its 497th plenary session of 25 and 26 March 2014 (meeting of 25 March), by … votes to … with … abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CES4014-2013_00_00_TRA_AC, sprejetem 16. oktobra 2013*, in mnenju CES 1331/88, sprejetem 14. decembra 1988**, zato je na 497. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. marca 2014 (seja z dne 25. marca) s/z ... glasovi za, ... glasovi proti in ... vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil, da o tem ne bo pripravil novega mnenja, saj zagovarja enako stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee has already set out its views on the subject of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 1022/2009, adopted on 10 June 20091, it decided, at its … plenary session of … and …
Odbor je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju CESE 1022/2009, sprejetem 10. junija 2009*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee has voiced its strong misgivings about the definition of this concept in its opinion on simplification of the R &amp; D Framework Programme (points 1.8 and 4.8)23, it recommends clarifying what is really meant here from a procedural point of view.
Ker je Odbor že izrazil močne pomisleke glede opredelitve tega izraza, in sicer v mnenju o poenostavitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov (glej točki 1.8 in 4.8)23, priporoča, da se pojasni, kaj to proceduralno dejansko pomeni.
Since the Committee has voiced its strong misgivings about the definition of this concept in its opinion on simplification of the R &amp; D Framework Programme (points 1.8 and 4.8)25, it recommends clarifying what is really meant here from a procedural point of view.
Ker je Odbor že izrazil močne pomisleke glede opredelitve tega izraza, in sicer v mnenju o poenostavitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov (glej točki 1.8 in 4.8)25, priporoča, da se pojasni, kaj to proceduralno dejansko pomeni.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorsed the content of the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor je popolnoma soglašal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorsed the content of the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorsed the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3) of the Rules of Procedure).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorsed the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorsed the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Ker se je Odbor popolnoma strinjal s predlogom in ni imel pripomb k njegovi vsebini, je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorsed the proposal and felt that it required no comment on its part, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor je popolnoma soglašal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor je popolnoma soglašal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Ker je Odbor soglašal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 448th plenary session of 22 and 23 October 2008 (meeting of 22 October 2008), by 115 votes in favour with 3 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 448. plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. oktobra 2008 (seja z dne 22. oktobra) s 115 glasovi za, nobenim glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 449th plenary session of 3 and 4 December 2008 (meeting of 3 December 2008), by 169 votes to two and four abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 449. plenarnem zasedanju 3. in 4. decembra 2008 (seja z dne 3. decembra) s 169 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 454th plenary session of 10 and 11 June 2009 (meeting of 10 June), by 112 votes with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 454. plenarnem zasedanju 10. in 11. junija 2009 (seja z dne 10. junija) s 112 glasovi za in 2 vzdržanima glasovoma o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 467th plenary session of 8 and 9 December 2010 (meeting of 8 December), by 97 votes in favour and three abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 467. plenarnem zasedanju 8. in 9. decembra 2010 (seja z dne 8. decembra) s 97 glasovi za in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 469th plenary session of 16 and 17 February 2011 (meeting of 16 February), by 108 votes in favour, with six abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 469. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. februarja 2011 (seja z dne 16. februarja) s 108 glasovi za, brez glasov proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 470th plenary session of 15/16 March 2011 (meeting of 15 March), by 180 votes to two with 21 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 470. plenarnem zasedanju 15. in 16. marca 2011 (seja z dne 15. marca) s 180 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 21 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 480th plenary session of 25 and 26 April 2012 (meeting of 25 April), by 144 votes with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 480. plenarnem zasedanju 25. in 26. aprila 2012 (seja z dne 25. aprila) s 144 glasovi za in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 490th plenary session of 22 and 23 May 2013 (meeting of 22 May), by 161 votes to 2 with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 490. plenarnem zasedanju 22. in 23. maja 2013 (seja z dne 22. maja) s 161 glasovi za, 2 glasovoma proti in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its … plenary session of and …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3) of the Rules of Procedure).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, the Committee decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Odbor se je v celoti strinjal z vsebino predloga in ni imel nobenih pripomb, zato je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and had already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in its earlier opinions, CES 1411/2000 and CESE 1705/2007 adopted on 29 November 2000* and 12 December 2007**, the Committee decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in je to vprašanje že obravnaval v prejšnjih mnenjih CES 1411/2000 in CESE 1705/2007, ki sta bili sprejeti 29. novembra 2000* in 12. decembra 2007**, zato je o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje in zavzel isto stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1411/2000, adopted on 29 November 2000, it decided, at its ... plenary session, held on …
Ker je svoje stališče o tej temi že izrazil v mnenju CESE 1411/2000, ki je bilo sprejeto 29. novembra 2000*, je na … plenarnem zasedanju
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 1411/2000, adopted on 29 November 2000, it decided, at its 440th plenary session, held on 12 and 13 December 2007 (meeting of 12 December), by 131 votes with 4 abstentions to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the abovementioned document.
Ker je svoje stališče o tej temi že izrazil v mnenju CESE 1411/2000, ki je bilo sprejeto 29. novembra 2000, je na 440. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2007 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 131 glasovi za, nobenim glasom proti in 4 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje ter se sklicuje na stališče iz omenjenega mnenja.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 413/1996, adopted on 27 March 1996*, it decided, at its ... plenary session, held on …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v svojem prejšnjem mnenju CESE 413/1996, sprejetem 27. marca 1996*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion, adopted on 24 February 1971*, and in the opinion CESE 196/1995, adopted on 23 February 1995**, it decided, at its ... plenary session, held on …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju, sprejetem 24. februarja 1971*, in v mnenju CESE 196/1995, sprejetem 23. februarja 1995*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion, adopted on 25 May 1977* and the opinion adopted on the 14 September 1994**, it decided, at its ... plenary session, held on …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju, sprejetem 25. maja 1977, in v mnenju, sprejetem 14. septembra 1994**, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion, adopted on 25 May 1977*, the opinion adopted on 14 September 1994** and the opinion adopted on 22 April 2008 *** it decided, at its 454th plenary session, held on 10 and 11 June 2009 (meeting of 10 June 2009), by 110 votes in favour and 5 abstentions to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned documents.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju, sprejetem 25. maja 1977*, mnenju, sprejetem 14. septembra 1994**, in mnenju, sprejetem 22. aprila 2008***, zato je na 454. plenarnem zasedanju 10. in 11. junija 2009 (seja z dne 10. junija 2009) s 110 glasovi za in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje in zavzel isto stališče kot v zgoraj navedenih mnenjih.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion, adopted on the 7 July 1999, and in the opinion EESC 249/2005, adopted on 9 March 2005, it decided, at its ... plenary session, held on …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga, poleg tega je to vprašanje že obravnaval v mnenju, sprejetem 7. julija 1999, in v mnenju CESE 249/2005, sprejetem 9. marca 2005**, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju … in
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinions CES 1411/2000 and CESE 1705/2007 adopted on 29 November 2000* and 12 December 2007**, it decided, at its 456th plenary session, held on 30 September – 1 October 2009 (meeting of 30 September 2009), by 180 votes in favour and 9 abstentions to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in je svoje stališče o tej temi že izrazil v mnenjih CESE 1411/2000 in CESE 1705/2007, ki sta bili sprejeti 29. novembra 2000* in 12. decembra 2007*, zato je na 456. plenarnem zasedanju 30. septembra in 1. oktobra 2009 (seja z dne 30. septembra 2009) s 180 glasovi za in 9 vzdržanimi glasovi o tem predlogu sprejel pozitivno mnenje ter se sklicuje na stališče iz navedenih mnenj.
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinions CES 1411/2000 and CESE 1705/2007 adopted on 29 November 2000* and 12 December 2007**, it decided, at its … plenary session, held on …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in je svoje stališče o tej temi že izrazil v mnenjih CESE 1411/2000 in CESE 1705/2007, ki sta bili sprejeti 29. novembra 2000* in 12. decembra 2007*, zato je na … plenarnem zasedanju
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinions CESE 1235/1988, adopted on 24 November 19881, and CESE 887/1996, adopted on 10 July 19962, it decided, at its ... plenary session , held on …
Ker se odbor v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in je svoje stališče o tej temi že izrazil v mnenjih CESE 1235/1988, ki je bilo sprejeto 24. novembra 1988*, in CESE 887/1996, ki je bilo sprejeto 10. julija 1996**, je na … plenarnem zasedanju
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously not to hold a general discussion and to put the opinion straight to the vote (Rules 50(4) and 56(3)).
Ker se je Odbor popolnoma strinjal s predlogom in ni imel pripomb k njegovi vsebini, je soglasno sklenil, da brez razprave takoj preide na glasovanje (člena 50(4) in 56(3) poslovnika).
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 504th plenary session of 21 and 22 January 2015 (meeting of …), by …
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 504. plenarnem zasedanju 21. in 22. januarja 2015 (seja z dne …)
Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 511th plenary session of ...
Odbor se v celoti strinja z vsebino predloga in nima nobenih pripomb, zato je na 511. plenarnem zasedanju