natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Point 4.4.3: Mr Malosse did not accept the text proposed by Mr Ekdahl, but did agree to include in the last sentence a reference to sectoral promotion missions where historically justified.
Ekdahl, vendar je soglašal, da je treba v zadnji stavek vključiti referenco na sektorske misije za spodbujanje, kjer je to upravičeno z zgodovinskega stališča.
Point 5.4 – second bullet point:
Točka 5.4, druga alinea:
Point 5.4 – second bullet point:
Točka 5.4, druga alineja:
Point 5.4 – third bullet point:
Točka 5.4, tretja alinea:
Point 5.4 – third bullet point:
Točka 5.4, tretja alineja:
Point 5.4, first paragraph:
Točka 5.4, prvi odstavek:
Point 5.5.1
2 – točka 5.5.1
Point 5: Recalls that the GATS is a voluntary agreement and that its principles do not impose either privatisation or deregulation, nor do they prescribe a particular degree of liberalisation as such; insists, however, that developing and least developed countries should not be pressured to liberalise services, in particular public services.
Točka 5: opozarja, da je GATS prostovoljni sporazum in da njegova načela ne vsiljujejo niti privatizacije niti deregulacije ter ne določajo posebne stopnje liberalizacije kot take; vztraja pa, da na razvite države in države v razvoju ni treba pritiskati, da liberalizirajo storitve, še posebej javne.
Point 5: Recalls that the GATS is a voluntary agreement and that its principles do not impose either privatisation or deregulation, nor do they prescribe a particular degree of liberalisation as such; insists, however, that developing and least developed countries should not be pressured to liberalise services, in particular public services.
Točka 5: opozarja, da je GATS prostovoljni sporazum in da njegova načela ne vsiljujejo niti privatizacije niti deregulacije ter prav tako ne določajo posebne stopnje liberalizacije kot take; vendar pa vztraja, da na razvite države in države v razvoju ni treba pritiskati, da liberalizirajo storitve, še posebej javne.
Point 69 of Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1)
Točka 69 Priloge III Uredbe (ES) št. 1882/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).
Point 7 is the consequence of the proposal, in Article 4(2) and (3), to centralise all provisions on exemptions from the reporting requirement under the Second Directive in that directive itself.
Točka 7 je nastala v skladu s predlogom iz člena 4(2) in (3), da se vse določbe o izvzetjih iz zahteve za poročanje v okviru Druge direktive zberejo v navedeni direktivi.
Point 8 of the new IIA concerns the margins beneath the ceilings.
Točka 8 novega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma se nanaša na razpoložljive razlike do zgornjih mej.
Point 9 is deleted.
Točka 9 se črta.
Point 9 provides for an update of forecast for payment appropriations after 2020 in the fourth year of the financial framework, according to the current practice and the March 2010 proposal.
V točki 9 je določeno, da se napovedi za odobritve plačil po letu 2020 posodobijo v četrtem letu, ki ga zajema finančni okvir, kar je v skladu z dosedanjo prakso in predlogom iz marca 2010.
Point I. Statistical Outputs is amended as follows:
točka I. Statistični rezultati se spremeni:
Point P means a representation of the position of the wheelchair occupant's hip when seated in the SWC, as defined in section 3 of ISO 10542-1:2012.
Točka P predstavlja položaj boka uporabnika invalidskega vozička, ko sedi v nadomestnem invalidskem vozičku, kot je opredeljeno v oddelku 3 standarda ISO 10542-1:2012.
Point-of-sale terminals switched instantaneously to euro on 1 January 2014.
Terminali prodajnih mest so 1. januarja 2014 takoj prešli na eure.
Points (1), (3), (7), (9) and (10) of Article 1 shall apply from 1 January 2013.
Točke (1), (3), (7), (9) in (10) člena 1 se uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2013.
Points (5) ensure that any refusal to, or failure to act, register the managers or EuVECA and EuSEF funds must be substantiated, notified and subject to a right of appeal before the courts.
Točka (5) določa, da mora biti vsakršna zavrnitev registracije ali odsotnost ukrepanja v zvezi z vlogo za registracijo upraviteljev ali skladov EuVECA in EuSEF utemeljena, sporočena in zanjo velja pravica do pritožbe na sodiščih.
Points (a) and (b) of paragraph 2 shall not prevent resolution authorities, where appropriate, from exercising those powers in relation to any part of a secured liability or a liability for which collateral has been pledged that exceeds the value of the assets, pledge, lien or collateral against which it is secured.
Točki (a) in (b) odstavka 2 organom za reševanje, kadar je to primerno, ne preprečujeta izvajanja pooblastil v povezavi s katerim koli delom zavarovane obveznosti ali obveznosti, zajamčene z zavarovanjem, ki presega vrednost sredstev, jamstva, pravice do zaplembe ali premoženja, s katerimi je zavarovana.
Points (a) and (d) of paragraph 3 shall apply only in respect of linear services.
Točki 3(a) in 3(d) se uporabljata samo v zvezi z linearnimi storitvami.
points (a) to (g) and (j) to (l) of Article 33(1), excluding deferred tax assets that rely on future profitability and arise from temporary differences;
člena 33(1)(a) do (g) in (j) do (l), razen odloženih terjatev za davek, ki se opirajo na prihodnjo donosnost in izhajajo iz začasnih razlik;
points (a) to (g) and (j) to (l) of Article 33(1), excluding the amount to be deducted for deferred tax assets that rely on future profitability and arise from temporary differences;
člena 33(1)(a) do (g) in (j) do (l), razen zneska, ki se odbije, za odložene terjatve za davek, ki se opirajo na prihodnjo donosnost in izhajajo iz začasnih razlik;
points (a) to (h) and (j) to (l) of Article 33(1), excluding deferred tax assets that rely on future profitability and arise from temporary differences.
člena 33(1)(a) do (h) in (j) do (l), razen odloženih terjatev za davek, ki se opirajo na prihodnjo donosnost in izhajajo iz začasnih razlik.
points (a) to (h) and (j) to (l) of Article 33(1), excluding deferred tax assets that rely on future profitability and arise from temporary differences.
člena 33(1)(a) do (h) in (j) do (l), razen odloženih terjatev za davek, ki se opirajo na prihodnjo donosnost in izhajajo iz začasnih razlik;
Points (b) and (c) of the first subparagraph are replaced by the following:
Točki (b) in (c) prvega pododstavka se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Points (b), (c) and (h) of paragraph 1 shall not apply to activities carried out by public authorities in the exercise of their public powers.
Točke (b), (c) in (h) odstavka 1 ne veljajo za dejavnosti, ki jih opravljajo javni organi pri izvajanju svojih javnih pristojnosti.
Points (c) and (d) of the first subparagraph may be waived for contracts signed in accordance with point (m) of point 11.1.
Točk (c) in (d) prvega pododstavka ni treba upoštevati pri naročilih, oddanih v skladu s točko 11.1(m).
Points (f) and (g) are inserted to grant or clarify visa fee waivers in certain situations involving relatives of Union citizens.
Vstavita se točki (f) in (g), da se sorodnikom državljanov Unije v določenih primerih dovolijo ali pojasnijo oprostitve vizumske takse.
points 19, 20 and 21 are replaced by the following:
točke 19, 20 in 21 se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Points 2 and 3 aim at centralising the exemption possibility, for Member States, from the requirement for an expert report on contributions in-kind in the Second Directive.
Namen točk 2 in 3 je, da se možnost držav članic glede izvzetja iz zahteve po strokovnem poročilu o prispevkih v naravi, centralizira v Drugi direktivi.
Points 2, 3 and 8 are deleted.
Točke 2, 3 in 8 se črtajo.
points 2, 6.1, 6.2.1 and 6.3 of UN/ECE Regulation No 5146 and Annexes 3 to 10 thereto;
točkah 2, 6.1, 6.2.1 in 6.3 Pravilnika UN/ECE št. 5146 in prilogah 3 do 10 Pravilnika;
Points 3.1, 4.1, 4.1.1 and 4.2 detail the reasons why the Commission's proposals on pack size and the location of health warnings are unsuitable.
Točke 3.1, 4.1, 4.1.1 in 4.2 podrobno navajajo razloge, zakaj predlogi Komisije o velikosti škatlic in umestitev zdravstvenih opozoril niso ustrezni.
Points I.1(e) and I.17 of Annex I to the 1985 Act of Accession
Točka I.1(e) in I.17 Priloge I k Aktu o Pristopu iz leta 1985
points out the need for systemic measures by the public authorities to save consumers from their gradual weakening and fall in consumption;
poudarja, da bi morali javni organi oblikovati sistemske ukrepe, da bi potrošnike zaščitili pred postopnim zmanjšanjem kupne moči in upadom potrošnje;
Points were then made by: Ms Studničná, who believed that it would be more appropriate for the CCMI to deal with the opinion on shipbreaking; Mr Siecker, who questioned why Group I had presented as many proposals for own-initiative opinions, when it seemed to be opposed to adopting the package; Ms Slavova on the addition of the word "globally" to the title of the REX section's opinion (see Opinion 34 below) in order to highlight that the opinion will cover external matters; Mr Dittmann, who asked about assessing the impact of own-initiative opinions that have already been completed and, finally, three section presidents, Mr van Iersel, Mr Coulon and Mr Trantina spoke about the practices for selecting the most relevant proposals employed within their respective sections.
Nato je Lucie STUDNIČNÁ izrazila mnenje, da bi bilo bolj primerno, da bi pripravo mnenja na lastno pobudo o razstavljanju ladij zaupali komisiji CCMI, Martina SIECKERJA je zanimalo, zakaj je I. skupina predstavila toliko predlogov za mnenja na lastno pobudo, saj se zdi, da nasprotuje sprejetju svežnja, Dilyana SLAVOVA je predlagala, da bi k naslovu mnenja strokovne skupine REX (glej 34. mnenje v nadaljevanju) dodali izraz „na globalni ravni“ in tako izpostavili dejstvo, da ima mnenje zunanjo razsežnost, Bernd DITTMANN je izrazil dvome glede ocenjevanja učinka mnenj na lastno pobudo, ki so bila že pripravljena, Joost van IERSEL, Pierre Jean COULON in Pavel TRANTINA pa so razpravljali o praksah znotraj strokovnih skupin, katerih predsedniki so, da bi izbrali najustreznejše predloge.
Points (16), (17) and (18) are replaced by the following:
Točke (16), (17) in (18) se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Points (3) and (4) are replaced by the following:
Točki (3) in (4) se nadomestita z naslednjim:
Points (8), (9) and (10) are replaced by the following:
Točke (8), (9) in (10) se nadomestijo z naslednjim:
Points (a) to (d) of the first subparagraph shall not apply in the case of purchase of supplies on particularly advantageous terms from a supplier which is definitively winding up its business activities, or from the receivers or liquidators of a bankruptcy, through an arrangement with creditors, or through a similar procedure under national law.
Točke (a) do (d) prvega pododstavka se ne uporabljajo za nakupe blaga pod posebno ugodnimi pogoji bodisi od dobavitelja blaga, ki končuje poslovne dejavnosti, ki gre v dokončno likvidacijo ali od stečajnega upravitelja, če se s tem strinjajo upniki, ali v skladu s po podobneim postopkuom po nacionalni zakonodaji.
Points (c) and (d) are deleted;
točki (c) in (d) se črtata
Points 1.1 to 1.1.10 of Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1008/2010 shall apply.
Uporabljajo se točke 1.1 do 1.1.10 Priloge III k Uredbi (EU) št. 1008/2010.
Points 2, 3 and 4 should be included and point 2 developed by specifying that the COSME programme will, in particular, support those measures that help ensure the participation of SMEs and microenterprises in the European standardisation process of formulating and adapting European standards and requirements as well as the implementation of these standards at enterprises.
Točke 2, 3 in 4 se povzamejo, točka 2 pa se še dopolni tako, da je v njej določeno, da bo program COSME podpiral zlasti ukrepe za sodelovanje MSP in mikro podjetij v postopku priprave in prilagoditve evropskih standardov in zahtev, pa tudi pri njihovem izvajanju v podjetjih.
Points 3.1 and points 6.2 and 6.4 shall apply to such procedures.
Za take postopke se uporabljajo točke 3.1, 6.2 in 6.4.
Point (11) is replaced by the following:
točka (11) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (2) is deleted;
točka 2 se črta;
Point (4) is replaced by the following:
točka (4) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (7) is replaced by the following:
točka (7) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Point (a) gives a non-exhaustive list of unforeseeable and unavoidable circumstances outside the carrier's control.
V točki (a) tega seznama so navedene nekatere nepredvidljive in neizogibne okoliščine, ki jih letalski prevoznik ne more obvladovati.
Point (a) of the third subparagraph of Article 55(7) shall apply.
Uporablja se točka (a) člena 55 (7).
point (b) of part 3 of the Annex .
točka (b) Dela 3 Priloge.
point (c) of the first paragraph of Article 93 must apply.
uporabiti se mora točka (c) prvega odstavka člena 93.
Point (d)
Točka (d)
Point (e)
Točka (e)
Point 1.11 and Point 4.2.1 – Amend as follows:
Točka 1.11 in točka 4.2.1 – Spremeni se tako:
Point 1.15, third indent
Točka 1.15, tretja alinea
Point 1.2 of Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1008/2010 shall apply with the exception of points 1.2.2, 1.2.3 and 1.2.5.
Uporablja se točka 1.2 Priloge III k Uredbi (EU) št. 1008/2010, razen točk 1.2.2, 1.2.3 in 1.2.5.
Point 1.22.2 (formerly point 3.6.2)
Točka 1.22.2 (prejšnja točka 3.6.2)
point 12 and Article 13 only
točka 12 in člen 13
Point 19 of Annex I only
Samo točka 19 Priloge I
Point 2.6 was thus amended as follows:
Točka 2.6 se torej spremeni tako:
Point 3.1 and points 6.1 and 6.4 shall apply to such procedures.
Za take postopke se uporabljajo točke 3.1, 6.1 in 6.4.
Point 3.4 of the Annex only
Samo točka 3.4 Priloge
Point 3.4 – Amend as follows:
Točka 3.4 – Spremeni se tako:
Point 4.1.14
Točka 4.1.14
Point 6.1 is without prejudice to the provisions of Article 40 on national small series type-approval.
Točka 6.1 ne posega v določbe člena 40 o nacionalni homologaciji majhne serije vozil.
Point 6.3 shall apply to such procedures.
Za take postopke se uporablja točka 6.3.
Point 6.5.3
Točka 6.5.3
Poland (47%, +8pp), the Czech Republic (47%, -1pp) and Latvia (46%, no change) had the highest share of respondents who wanted to adopt the euro as late as possible.
Na Poljskem (47 %, +8 odstotnih točk), v Češki republiki (47 %, –1 odstotna točka) in Latviji (46 %, nobene spremembe) je bil najvišji delež anketirancev, ki bi želeli, da se euro uvede čim pozneje.
Poland and Romania were the recipients of 32 % of all requests.
Poljska in Romunija sta bili prejemnici 32 % vseh zahtevkov.
Poland could be an example of such situation, where large part of the cosmetics sector is still independent with more than 400 enterprises, mostly SMEs, operating.
Poljska je primer države, v kateri je kozmetična industrija večinoma neodvisna, saj obsega več kot 400 podjetij, večinoma MSP.
Poland does not use the option provided for in Article 22 of the Directive (individual derogation).
Poljska ne uporablja možnosti iz člena 22 Direktive (individualno odstopanje).
Poland has introduced training measures targeting 500 procurers, 1500 representatives of SMEs and 1000 business intermediary organisations to strengthen its use of public procurement of innovative products and services.
Poljska je uvedla ukrepe usposabljanja, usmerjene na 500 javnih naročnikov, 1 500 predstavnikov malih in srednjih podjetij ter 1 000 panožnih posredniških organizacij, da bi okrepila uporabo javnega naročanja inovativnih proizvodov in storitev.
Poland has made a number of commitments under the Euro Plus Pact.
Poljska je sprejela številne zaveze v okviru pakta „euro plus“.
Poland has the highest unemployment rate (19.8 per cent in 2002) and the lowest employment rate (51.5 per cent) among the acceding countries.
Poljska ima najvišjo stopnjo brezposelnosti (19.8 odstotka v letu 2002) in najnižjo stopnjo zaposlenosti (51.5 odstotka) med državami pristopnicami.
Poland introduced in 2011 reforms to increase the share of public funding allocated to R &amp; I on a competitive basis through calls for proposals evaluated by independent and international experts.
Poljska je leta 2011 uvedla reforme za povečanje deleža javnega financiranja na konkurenčni osnovi, namenjenega raziskavam in inovacijam, in sicer v okviru javnih razpisov za zbiranje predlogov, ki so jih ocenili neodvisni in mednarodni strokovnjaki.
Poland rejected 272 applications in the period July 2009 to March 2010, mainly on the basis of SIS alerts, but also because the person's current permit was still valid.
Poljska je od julija 2009 do marca 2010 zavrnila 272 vlog, v glavnem na podlagi ukrepov SIS, a tudi ker je bilo trenutno dovoljenje oseb še veljavno.
Poland substantially increased employment aid and introduced new block exempted measures representing several € 100 million of expenditure16.
Poljska je znatno povečala pomoč za zaposlovanje in uvedla nove ukrepe na podlagi skupinskih izjem, za katere je namenila več 100 milijonov EUR izdatkov16.
Poland suffered two interconnected waves of flooding in May and June 2010 caused by a period of exceptionally heavy rainfall.
Poljsko sta maja in junija 2010 prizadela dva medsebojno povezana vala poplav, ki ju je povzročilo izjemno močno deževje.
Poland will link the voting campaign to the 10th anniversary of EU membership.
Poljska bo volilno kampanjo povezala z 10. obletnico članstva v EU.
Poland's GDP growth slowed to 5% in 2008, after growing by 6.7% in 2007.
Rast poljskega BDP se je v letu 2008 upočasnila na 5 %, potem ko je v letu 2007 dosegla 6,7 %.
Poland, April 2015, €8 billion EUR, Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego (BGK) and another public institution Polish Investments for Development (PIR),
Poljska, april 2015, 8 milijard EUR, Bank Gospodarstwa Krajowego (BGK) in druga javna institucija Poljske naložbe za razvoj (PIR),
Poland, Hungary and Slovakia shall be authorised to bring into force the provisions necessary to comply with paragraph 2 by 31 December 2014 at the latest; they shall apply those provisions from 1 January 2015.
Poljski, Madžarski in Slovaški se dovoli, da sprejmejo določbe, ki so potrebne za uskladitev z odstavkom 2, najpozneje do 31. decembra 2014; navedene določbe uporabljajo od 1. januarja 2015.
Poland: Articles 84 and 85 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Kodeks postępowania cywilnego) concerning third-partynotices (przypozwanie),—
Poljska: členi 84 do 85 zakonika o pravdnem postopku (Kodeks postępowania cywilnego) o obvestitvi drugega o pravdi (przypozwanie),
Poland’s agricultural sector employs 11.4 % of the workforce, more than double the EU average, while generating only 3.3 % of national gross value added.
Poljski kmetijski sektor zaposluje 11,4 % delovne sile, kar je več kot dvakrat več od povprečja EU, hkrati pa ustvarja samo 3,3 % nacionalne bruto dodane vrednosti.
Polar-coordinate plate, diameter &gt; 8,6 mm.
Plošča s polarnimi koordinatami, premer &gt; 8,6 mm.
Poles and networks of excellence should be strengthened and better use should be made of public support mechanisms including fiscal measures to leverage private R &amp; D.
Okrepiti je treba centre in mreže odličnosti in bolje izrabiti javne mehanizme podpore, tudi davčne ukrepe za spodbuditev zasebnega sektorja raziskav in razvoja.
Poles of excellence could be defined as regional research-driven clusters able to attract researchers, investors and leading players in a given sector in terms of R &amp; D expenditure; they can contribute greatly to European global competitiveness.
Centri odličnosti bi se lahko opredelili kot regionalne, v raziskave usmerjene skupine, ki so sposobne privabiti raziskovalce, vlagatelje in ključne akterje v danem sektorju glede na izdatke za R &amp; R; ti centri lahko v veliki meri prispevajo h globalni konkurenčnosti Evrope.
Polica (IT-II)
g. POLICA (IT-II)
Polica, Antonio (IT-II) (Rule 62 - Palmieri, Stefano)
Antonio POLICA (IT-II) (Stefano PALMIERI, člen 62)
Policies have been aiming to narrow the gap between the United States and the European Union as regards investment in R &amp; D and human capital.
Politike si prizadevajo za zmanjšanje razlike med Združenimi državami in Evropsko unijo na področju naložb v raziskave in razvoj ter človeški kapital.
Policies on Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), content and Research and Development (R &amp; D) play an important role in this context.
Politike informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij (IKT), vsebina ter raziskave in razvoj (R &amp; R) igrajo v tem okviru pomembno vlogo.
Policies should also aim at increasing the EU average level of participation in lifelong learning to at least 12.5 % of the adult working-age population (25 to 64 age group).
Namen politik bi moralo biti tudi povečanje povprečnega deleža odraslih, za delo sposobnih oseb (starostna skupina od 25 do 64 let) v EU, ki se udeležujejo vseživljenjskega učenja, na najmanj 12,5 %.
Policies that have already been implemented, or are now being pursued, are likely to lead to a long-term average temperature increase of between 3.6°C and 5.3°C (compared with pre-industrial age levels), with most of the increase occurring this century (based on climate modelling).
Ukrepi, ki so že bili uvedeni ali se jih sedaj uvaja, bodo najverjetneje vodili v dolgoročno zvišanje povprečne temperature za 3,6 do 5,3 °C (v primerjavi s stopnjami iz predindustrijske dobe), do tega zvišanja pa bo v glavnem prišlo še v tem stoletju (izhajajoč iz podnebnih modelov).
Policy Area 11: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
Področje politike 11: Pomorske zadeve in ribištvo
Policy area B: Regulation
Področje politike B: ureditev
Policy area C: Financing
Področje politike C: financiranje
Policy area concerned in the ABM/ABB structure57
Zadevno področje v strukturi ABM/ABB57
Policy Area(s) concerned and associated Activity/Activities: ABB2 Internal market for goods &amp; Sectoral policies
Zadevno(-a) področje(-a) in povezana(-e) dejavnost(-i): ABB2 Notranji trg blaga in sektorske politike
Policy Area(s) concerned and associated Activity/Activities: Energy &amp; Transport
Zadevno-(a) področje(-a) in povezana(-e) dejavnost(-i): Energetika in promet
Policy Area(s) concerned and associated Activity/Activities: Research and Technological Development: Seventh Framework Programme, Article 169 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
Zadevno(-a) področje(-a) in povezana(-e) dejavnost(-i): Raziskave in tehnološki razvoj: Sedmi okvirni program, člen 169 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
Policy area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure28
Zadevna področja v strukturi ABM/ABB28
Policy area: Area of Home Affairs (title 18)
Področje politike: Področje notranjih zadev (naslov 18)
Policy area: Area of Home Affairs (title 18)
Področje: področje notranjih zadev (naslov 18)
Policy area: Asylum and Migration (Title 18)
Področje: Azil in migracije (naslov 18)
Policy Area: Energy (ABB Code 32 02)
Področje: energetika (koda ABB 32 02)
Policy area: Migration and Home Affairs (title 18)
Področje: migracije in notranje zadeve (naslov 18)
Policy area: Title 6 - Transport
Področje: Naslov 6 – promet
Policy areas concerned in the ABM/ABB structure
Zadevna področja v strukturi ABM/ABB
Policy decisions presented in the White Paper will subsequently be further developed in close cooperation with all relevant stakeholders and will be subject to proportionate impact assessments before adoption.
Odločitve o politiki, predstavljene v Beli knjigi, se bodo naknadno nadalje razvile v tesnem sodelovanju z vsemi ustreznimi zainteresiranimi stranmi in bodo pred sprejetjem predmet sorazmernih presoj vpliva.
Policy design should take account of the long term impact of R &amp; I and operate on the basis of a stable multi-annual strategic framework and forward planning of public investment.
Politiko bi bilo treba voditi na podlagi stabilnega večletnega strateškega okvira in vnaprejšnjega načrtovanja javnih naložb, pri tem pa upoštevati dolgoročni vpliv raziskav in inovacij.