natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Committee believes that the development of labour markets in the regions concerned is a factor for industrial change which should not be underestimated.
Odbor meni, da je razvoj trgov dela v teh regijah pomemben dejavnik za spremembe v industriji, ki ga ne bi smeli podcenjevati.
The Committee believes that the new proposal for a Regulation is unambitious, its scope being limited to a price adjustment for contracts of a value equal to or greater than EUR 5 000 000, and points out that only 7% of public purchasing contracts exceed EUR 5 000 000 in value.
Odbor predvsem meni, da je novi predlog uredbe premalo ambiciozen, saj je področje njegove uporabe zgolj prilagoditev cene pri pogodbah, katerih vrednost je 5 000 000 EUR ali več, pri tem pa poudarja, da je samo pri 7 % vseh javnih naročil vrednost večja od 5 000 000 EUR.
The Committee believes that the powers to adopt delegated and implementing acts, as laid down in the Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 (COM(2011) 663 final), will improve the consistency of the measures for information provision and promotion for agricultural products, and will contribute to their uniform implementation.
Odbor meni, da bodo pooblastila za sprejemanje delegiranih in izvedbenih aktov, določena v predlogu Komisije za uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3/2008 (COM(2011) 663 konč.), pripomogla k večji doslednosti ukrepov za promocijo kmetijskih proizvodov in obveščanje o njih ter k njihovemu enotnemu izvajanju.
The Committee believes that the powers to adopt delegated and implementing acts, as laid down in the Commission's Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 (COM(2011) 663 final), will improve the consistency of the measures for information provision and promotion for agricultural products, and will contribute to their uniform implementation.
Odbor meni, da bodo pooblastila za sprejemanje delegiranih in izvedbenih aktov, določena v predlogu Komisije za uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3/2008 (COM(2011) 663 konč.), pripomogla k večji doslednosti ukrepov za promocijo kmetijskih proizvodov in informiranje o njih ter k njihovemu enotnemu izvajanju.
The Committee believes that the powers to adopt delegated and implementing acts, as laid down in the Commission's Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 (COM(2011) 663 final), will improve the consistency of the measures for information provision and promotion for agricultural products, and will contribute to their uniform implementation.
Odbor meni, da bodo pooblastila za sprejemanje delegiranih in izvedbenih aktov, določena v predlogu Komisije za uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3/2008 (COM(2011) 663 konč.), pripomogla k večji doslednosti ukrepov za promocijo kmetijskih proizvodov in obveščanje o njih ter k njihovemu enotnemu izvajanju.
The Committee believes that the timeframe must remain the one set out in the chart in Article 12.4.1 of UN/ECE R 1312, which provides for a gradual introduction, starting in July 2009 and ending in July 2016, depending on the type of vehicle.
Odbor meni, da se mora ohraniti časovni okvir iz tabele člena 12.4.1, ki je bil dogovorjen za pravilnik UN/ECE R 1312 ter določa postopno uvajanje od začetka julija 2009 do julija 2016, odvisno od tipa vozila.
The Committee believes that the timeframe must remain the one set out in the chart in Article 12.4.1 of UN/ECE R 1313, which provides for a gradual introduction, starting in July 2009 and ending in July 2016, depending on the type of vehicle.
Odbor meni, da se mora ohraniti časovni okvir iz tabele člena 12.4.1, ki je bil dogovorjen za pravilnik UN/ECE R 1313 ter določa postopno uvajanje od začetka julija 2009 do julija 2016, odvisno od tipa vozila.
The Committee believes that this Community framework of producer organisations could be maintained by retaining a number of the provisions of Title II of Regulation (EC) No 404/93, specifically Articles 5, 8 and 9.
Odbor meni, da bi okvir Skupnosti za organizacije proizvajalcev lahko ohranili s pomočjo ohranitve nekaterih določb iz naslova II uredbe (ES) št. 404/93, zlasti členov 5,8 in 9.
The Committee believes that, in Europe, a concerted and common effort has to be made in order to ensure an appropriate control on the flow of war material or, more generally, defence equipment.
EESO meni, da si je v evropskem prostoru treba skupaj prizadevati, da se zagotovi ustrezen nadzor pretoka materiala za uporabo v vojni, oziroma bolj splošno, obrambne opreme.
The Committee believes the estimated time and cost savings to issuers referred to in the impact assessment of the proposal for a Regulation' (about EUR 175 million per year) will further contribute to increasing the EU business competitiveness.
Odbor meni, da bodo prihranki pri času in stroških za vlagatelje, ki bodo po napovedi iz ocene učinka predloga uredbe znašali približno 175 milijonov EUR na leto, še dodatno povečali konkurenčnost podjetij EU.
The Committee calls for an addition to Article 13, stipulating that the choice to extend the scope of the Common European Sales Law may be made only once the following conditions have been fulfilled: a thorough evaluation must be conducted of the impact on SMEs ("SME test") and on consumers; SME and consumer organisations and all stakeholders must be consulted; and the outcome of the evaluations and consultations must be taken into consideration.
Odbor poziva, da se v člen 13 doda določba, da se lahko področje uporabe skupnega evropskega prodajnega prava razširi le, če so izpolnjeni naslednji pogoji: izvesti je treba temeljito oceno učinka za MSP ("test MSP") in potrošnike; opraviti je treba posvetovanje z organizacijami MSP in potrošnikov ter z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi; upoštevati je treba rezultate ocen in posvetovanj.
The Committee calls for the issue as a whole to be reviewed in the near future so that a definitive system can be put in place and one of the greatest remaining barriers to the achievement of a single market based on Community rules can be reduced or even removed.
Na splošno se zavzema za to, da bi bila celotna tematika v ne preveč daljni prihodnosti ponovno pregledana, da bo uveden dokončen sistem in da bodo s tem zmanjšane oz. popolnoma odpravljene največje ovire, ki preprečujejo dovršitev notranjega trga, ki temelji na skupnih predpisih.
The Committee calls on the Commission and the European Council not to dress up old objectives with new data but to draw up a binding plan of action for all Commission departments, with a clear timetable and interim objectives as well as sufficient funding, and also to provide guidelines as to the changes needed at Member State level.
Zato zahteva, da Komisija in Evropski svet namesto da stare cilje le opremita z novimi podatki, pripravita zavezujoč akcijski načrt za vse službe Komisije, z jasnim časovnim razporedom in vmesnimi cilji ter zadostnimi finančnimi sredstvi in zagotovita navodila, kaj se mora spremeniti na ravni držav članic.
The Committee calls on the Council and the Parliament to act on this proposal; in addition, government spending and private investment in research and development (in Europe) should be increased accordingly.
Odbor poziva Svet in Parlament, naj sledita predlogu, vlade in države članice pa, naj povečajo nacionalni proračun za R &amp; R ter industrijo, naj v skladu s cilji okrepi investicije v raziskave in razvoj, in sicer v Evropi.
The Committee calls on the European Parliament, the European Council and, in particular, Member State heads of state or government to make the urgently needed R &amp; D investments proposed by the Commission available in full and to ensure that these do not become a pawn in – or fall victim to – the negotiations on the EU's future overall budget.
Odbor poziva Evropski parlament, Evropski svet ter zlasti predsednike in vlade držav članic, da nujno potrebnih naložb v raziskave in razvoj, ki jih je predlagala Komisija, ne prepuščajo pogajanjem o prihodnjem skupnem proračunu EU.
The Committee confirms and reiterates the points it made previously in its opinion on the Green Paper on online gambling in the internal market and regrets that the Commission has taken only some of its conclusions on board.
EESO potrjuje in ponovno poudarja svoje stališče, ki ga je podal že v mnenju o zeleni knjigi o spletnih igrah na srečo na notranjem trgu, in obžaluje, da je Komisija upoštevala le nekatere od njegovih sklepov.
The Committee considers appropriate the Commission's proposal, since the introduction of the "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" will involve the co-legislators more fully in scrutinising executive acts.
Odbor meni, da je predlog Komisije primeren, ker bo izvajanje "regulativnega postopka s pregledom" sozakonodajalce močneje vključevalo v nadzor podzakonskih aktov.
The Committee considers that a lack of clarity persists on the term "frivolous claims" and that such a loose term has no legal status.
Odbor meni, da je pojem "neresni zahtevki" nejasen in da tako nejasen pojem nima pravne veljave.
The Committee considers that the proposed directive could help to promote employment in the maritime and fishery sectors and improve living and working conditions, social protection and dialogue between management and labour, consistent with the general policy aims envisaged under Article 151 TFEU.
Odbor meni, da predlog direktive lahko prispeva k spodbujanju zaposlovanja v pomorskem sektorju in ribištvu ter izboljšanju življenjskih in delovnih pogojev, socialnega varstva ter dialoga med socialnimi partnerji, kar je v skladu s splošnimi političnimi cilji, določenimi v členu 151 PDEU.
The Committee considers that the reference to "volumes" in Article 18(2)e) should be deleted, and that the wording of Article 18(2)e) in relation to Article 18(4) should be clarified to ensure the programming of the measures and actions is sufficiently flexible.
Odbor meni, da je treba črtati sklicevanje na "količine" v členu 18(2)(e) ter da je treba pojasniti besedilo te določbe v povezavi s členom 18(4), da se omogoči ustrezna prožnosti pri načrtovanju ukrepov in projektov.
The Committee considers that when over 66% of a budget is made up of own resources, the concept of fair return should be abandoned as it runs counter to the values of solidarity and mutual benefit that underpin European integration (see Point 5.2.1).
Odbor namreč meni, da se je treba, kadar je delež lastnih sredstev v proračunu več kot 66 %, oddaljiti od koncepta "pravičnega povračila", ki je v nasprotju z vrednotama solidarnosti in vzajemnih koristi evropske povezave (glej točko 5.2.1).
The Committee considers the Commission's working documents SEC(2008) 2209, SEC(2008) 2208 and SEC(2008) 2207 to be very sensible, apart from the conclusions they draw, as they provide a good insight into the subject.
Odbor meni, da so delovni dokumenti SEC(2008) 2009, SEC(2008) 2208 in SEC(2008) 2207 Komisije, ne glede na podane sklepe, zelo smiselni, ker na dostopen način zagotavljajo dober vpogled v tematiko.
The Committee considers the Commission's working documents SEC(2008) 2209, SEC(2008) 2208 and SEC(2008) 2207 to be very sensible, apart from the conclusions they draw.
Odbor meni, da so delovni dokumenti SEC(2008) 2009, SEC(2008) 2208 in SEC(2008) 2207 Komisije, razen podanih sklepov, zelo smiselni.
The Committee considers the Community R &amp; D Framework Programme and the framework programme of the European Atomic Energy Community to be the main Community instruments for realising the European Research Area.
Po mnenju Odbora sta okvirni program Skupnosti za raziskave in razvoj ter okvirni program Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo temeljna instrumenta Skupnosti za uresničitev Evropskega raziskovalnega prostora.
The Committee considers the European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to be a key instrument in EU climate and energy policy for reducing the EU's industrial emissions, and, therefore, calls for its genuine reform aimed at achieving both the EU's climate objectives for 2020 and 2030 while safeguarding our industrial competitiveness and avoiding investment leakage.
Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor (EESO) meni, da je sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami (EU ETS) ključen instrument podnebne in energetske politike EU za zmanjšanje industrijskih emisij EU, zato se zavzema za dejansko reformo, katere cilj je doseči podnebne cilje EU za 2020 in 2030, zavarovati konkurenčnost industrije EU in se izogniti selitvi naložb.
The Committee considers, however, that the 36 month deadline for modal shift actions is too short and that it should, as for the other actions, be set at 60 months.
Vendar pa Odbor meni, da je rok šestintrideset mesecev prekratek za prenos načina prevoza in da bi ta rok moral biti šestdeset mesecev, enako kot v primeru ostalih ukrepov.
The Committee considers, however, that the 36 month deadline for modal shift actions is too short and that it should, as for the other actions, be set at 60 months.
Vendar pa Odbor meni, da je šestintrideset mesečni rok prekratek za prenos načina prevoza in da bi ta rok moral biti šestdeset mesecev, enako kot v primeru ostalih ukrepov.
The Committee continues to believe firmly that the best way to guarantee the Union's democratic life is to anchor such provisions in a fixed constitutional settlement.
Odbor je še naprej trdno prepričan, da je treba za zagotovitev demokratičnega življenja Unije tovrstne določbe trdno zasidrati v ustavni pogodbi.
The Committee decided, at its 440th plenary session, held on 12 and 13 December 2007 (meeting of 12 December), by 139 votes with 3 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposals.
Odbor je na 440. plenarnem zasedanju 12. in 13. decembra 2007 (seja z dne 12. decembra) s 139 glasovi za, nobenim glasom proti in 3 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil pripraviti pozitivno mnenje o teh predlogih.
The Committee decided, at its 493rd plenary session of 16 and 17 October 2013 (meeting of 16 October), by 149 votes to 3 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor je na 493. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. oktobra 2013 (seja z dne 16. oktobra) s 149 glasovi za, 3 glasovi proti in 6 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
The Committee decided, at its 493rd plenary session of 16 and 17 October 2013 (meeting of 16 October), by … votes to … with … abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor je na 493. plenarnem zasedanju 16. in 17. oktobra 2013 (seja z dne 16. oktobra) s/z ... glasovi za, ... glasovi proti in ... vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
The Committee decided, at its 495th plenary session of 21 and 22 January 2014 (meeting of 21 January), by 150 votes with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.
Odbor je na 495. plenarnem zasedanju 21. in 22. januarja 2014 (seja z dne 21. januarja) s 150 glasovi za in 5 vzdržanimi glasovi sklenil o tem predlogu podati pozitivno mnenje.
The Committee delivered no opinion: thirteen Member States (156 votes) voted in favour, eight Member States (102 votes) voted against, five Member States (84 votes) abstained and one Member State (3 votes) was not represented.
Odbor ni dal mnenja: trinajst držav članic (156 glasov) je glasovalo za, pet držav članic (102 glasova) je glasovalo proti, šest držav članic (84 glasov) se je vzdržalo, ena država članica (3 glasovi) pa ni bila zastopana.
The Committee deplores that commitments set in the National Reform Programmes 2011 are insufficient to meet most of the EU-level targets; in light of the growing concern that Europe 2020 targets will not be met, the Committee calls upon the Commission and Member State governments, in particular, to redouble their efforts and rectify this slippage that has been identified so early in the programme and ensure that governments, stakeholders and citizens in every country take ownership of and implement their reform programme.
32. Odbor izraža nezadovoljstvo nad nezadostnostjo zavez iz nacionalnih reformnih programov za leto 2011, ki ne izpolnjujejo večine ciljev na ravni EU; ker narašča bojazen, da cilji strategije Evropa 2020 ne bodo doseženi, Odbor poziva Komisijo in predvsem vlade držav članic, naj podvojijo prizadevanja in zapolnijo vrzeli v programih, ki so bile ugotovljene zelo zgodaj, ter zagotovijo, da bodo vlade, zainteresirane strani in državljani v vsaki državi prevzeli odgovornost za reformni program in ga uresničili.
The Committee deplores that commitments set in the National Reform Programmes 2011 are insufficient to meet most of the EU-level targets; in light of the growing concern that Europe 2020 targets will not be met, the Committee calls upon the Commission and Member State governments, in particular, to redouble their efforts and rectify this slippage that has been identified so early in the programme and ensure that governments, stakeholders and citizens in every country take ownership of and implement their reform programme.
32. Odbor izraža nezadovoljstvo nad nezadostnostjo zavez iz nacionalnih reformnih programov za leto 2011, ki ne izpolnjujejo večine ciljev na ravni EU; ker narašča bojazen, da cilji strategije Evropa 2020 ne bodo doseženi, Odbor poziva Komisijo in predvsem vlade držav članic, naj podvojijo prizadevanja in zapolnijo vrzeli v programih, ki so bile ugotovljene zelo zgodaj, ter zagotovijo, da bodo vlade, zainteresirane strani in državljani v vsaki državi prevzeli odgovornost za reformni program in ga izvedli.
The Committee does not understand this reasoning at all; it has more than once noted the need to allow for "Lisbonisation of the EU budget" in the context of the financial perspective, since it must at any rate be made clear that adequate financial resources will be made available to achieve the objectives of both the European Employment Strategy and the social policy agenda.9 The EESC therefore strongly recommends that adequate resources be provided for in the projected budget for PROGRESS.
Odbor se nikakor ne more strinjati s to argumentacijo, saj je vendar že večkrat vztrajal pri nujnosti, da je treba v okviru finančnega načrta toliko paziti na ''lizbonizacijo proračuna EU'', ker mora biti vsekakor jasno, da mora biti zagotovljena ustrezna finančna osnova za doseganje ciljev tako evropske strategije zaposlovanja kot tudi socialno-politične agende.9 EESO se v tem smislu odločno zavzema, da se v finančni načrt za program PROGRESS vključijo zadostna proračunska sredstva.
The Committee does not understand this reasoning at all; it has more than once noted the need to allow for "Lisbonisation of the EU budget" in the context of the financial perspective, since it must at any rate be made clear that adequate financial resources will be made available to achieve the objectives of both the European Employment Strategy and the social policy agenda.9 The EESC therefore strongly recommends that adequate resources be provided for in the projected budget for PROGRESS.
Odbor se nikakor ne more strinjati s to argumentacijo, saj je vendar že večkrat vztrajal pri nujnosti, da je treba v okviru finančne perspektive paziti na ''lizbonizacijo proračuna EU'', ker mora biti vsekakor jasno, da mora biti zagotovljena ustrezna finančna osnova za doseganje ciljev tako evropske strategije zaposlovanja kot tudi socialno-politične agende.9 EESO se v tem smislu odločno zavzema, da se v finančni načrt za program PROGRESS vključijo zadostna proračunska sredstva.
The Committee drew up an opinion15 on the subject under the Czech presidency in spring 2009.
Spomladi 2009 je Odbor med češkim predsedovanjem pripravil mnenje15 o tej temi.
The Committee drew up an opinion16 on the subject under the Czech presidency in spring 2009.
Spomladi 2009 je Odbor med češkim predsedovanjem pripravil mnenje16 o tej temi.
The Committee emphasises the fact that a European Community Patent would help to faster and better protect the intellectual property rights emerging from European investment in R &amp; D.
Odbor poudarja dejstvo, da bi evropski patent Skupnosti pripomogel k hitrejši in boljši zaščiti pravic intelektualne lastnine, izhajajočih iz evropskih vlaganj v raziskave in razvoj.
The Committee emphasises the fact that a European Community Patent would help to faster and better protect the intellectual property rights emerging from European investment in R &amp; D.
Odbor poudarja dejstvo, da bi patent Evropske skupnosti pripomogel k hitrejši in boljši zaščiti pravic intelektualne lastnine, izhajajočih iz evropskih vlaganj v raziskave in razvoj.
The Committee emphasises the need, in particular, to stimulate private funding by using EU measures and to be more involved in global R &amp; D cooperation.
Poudarja, da je zlasti treba z ukrepi EU spodbujati zasebno financiranje ter okrepiti sodelovanje na področju raziskav in razvoja na svetovni ravni.
The Committee endorsed this decision at its plenary session on 26 and 27 May 2010 (session of 27 May 2010).
Odbor je takšno odločitev podprl na plenarnem zasedanju 26. in 27. maja 2010 (seja z dne 27. maja).
The Committee endorses the content of the proposal and refers to the position it had taken in its previous opinion CES 330/97 adopted on 20 March 1997.
Odbor podpira vsebino predloga in se sklicuje na stališče iz svojega prejšnjega mnenja CES 330/97, sprejetega 20. marca 1997.
The Committee essentially supports the proposal, but calls on the Commission to take account of the reservations raised in this regard and to amend the text of the recitals accordingly.
Odbor v glavnem podpira predlog, vendar poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva zadržke, navedene v tem dokumentu, in ustrezno spremeni uvodne izjave.
The Committee established by Article 131 may also discuss the application of Article 87 in a given case.
Odbor iz člena 131 lahko razpravlja tudi o uporabi člena 87 v posameznem primeru.
The committee established under Article 11 of the proposed Regulation will assist the Commission with implementation of GMES initial operations, whereas the FP7 programme committee in its space configuration will continue to assist the Commission with management of FP7 funds.
Odbor, ustanovljen v skladu s členom 11 predlagane uredbe, bo Komisiji pomagal pri izvajanju začetnih operativnih dejavnosti GMES, odbor za program FP7 iz tematskega področja za vesolje pa bo Komisiji še naprej pomagal z upravljanjem sredstev FP7.
The Committee examined this technology in its opinion of 11 July 200723.
Odbor je to tehnologijo preučil v svojem mnenju z dne 11. julija 200722.
The Committee examined this technology in its opinion of 11 July 200723.
Odbor je to tehnologijo preučil v svojem mnenju z dne 11. julija 200723.
The Committee feels that one solution might be a joint undertaking (under Article 171 of the Treaty), where the Member States concerned participate directly (cf. the formula used for the Galileo joint undertaking)24.
Odbor meni, da bi bilo treba proučiti možnost ustanovitve skupnega podjetja (v skladu s členom 171 Pogodbe), pri čemer bi zainteresirane države članice sodelovale neposredno (glej rešitev, ki je uporabljena za skupno podjetje Galileo)24.
The Committee feels that one solution might be a joint undertaking (under Article 171 of the Treaty), where the Member States concerned participate directly (cf. the formula used for the Galileo joint undertaking)25.
Odbor meni, da bi bilo treba proučiti možnost ustanovitve skupnega podjetja (v skladu s členom 171 Pogodbe), pri čemer bi zainteresirane države članice sodelovale neposredno (glej rešitev, ki je uporabljena za skupno podjetje Galileo)25.
The Committee feels that the wording used here is vague, and questions whether it is in customers' interests.
EESO meni, da ta formulacija ni dovolj jasna in se sprašuje, ali je v interesu strank.