natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its opinion of 11 March 2011, the High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens supported a possible Commission initiative to simplify registration conditions and formalities.
Skupina neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani za upravne obremenitve na visoki ravni je v svojem mnenju z dne 11. marca 2011 podprla možno pobudo Komisije za poenostavitev pogojev in formalnosti pri registraciji.
In its opinion of 16 October 2008 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena na podlagi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, je v svojem mnenju z dne 16. oktobra 2008 izjavila, da se zgoraj omenjeni predlog omejuje na jasno in enostavno kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, ki jih ta kodifikacija zadeva.
In its opinion of 17 October 2001 on the second energy package10, the Committee called on the Commission "after an assessment of its operation, to consider transforming this Council [ERGEG] at some future date into a European Agency or similar body, with responsibility for matters relating to international transport in electricity and natural gas".
V svojem mnenju z dne 17. oktobra 2001 o drugem energetskem paketu10 je Odbor pozval Komisijo, naj " v prihodnosti in na podlagi ustreznih izkušenj delovanja – prouči možnost, da bi ta svet (ERGEG) spremenili v evropsko agencijo ali podobno telo, s pristojnostmi za mednarodni promet elektrike in zemeljskega plina."
In its opinion of 17 October 2001 on the second energy package10, the Committee called on the Commission "after an assessment of its operation, to consider transforming this Council [ERGEG] at some future date into a European Agency or similar body, with responsibility for matters relating to international transport in electricity and natural gas".
V svojem mnenju z dne 17. oktobra 2001 o drugem energetskem paketu10 je Odbor predlagal, da "poziva Komisijo, naj – v prihodnosti in na podlagi ustreznih izkušenj delovanja – prouči možnost, da bi ta svet (ERGEG) spremenili v evropsko agencijo ali podobno telo, s pristojnostmi za mednarodni promet elektrike in zemeljskega plina."
In its opinion of 17 September 2014 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that at the date on which the proposal referred to in point 1 was submitted by the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council it confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
V svojem mnenju z dne 17. Septembra 2014 je posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, potrdila, da se je na dan, ko je Komisija predlog iz točke 1 posredovala Evropskemu parlamentu in Sveta, omejila na zgolj kodifikacijo brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, na katere se nanaša.
In its opinion of 17 September 2014 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
V svojem mnenju z dne 17. Septembra 2014 je posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, potrdila, da se predlog iz točke 1, omejuje na zgolj kodifikacijo brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, na katere se nanaša.
In its opinion of 2 February 2007 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena na podlagi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, je v svojem mnenju z dne 2. februarja 2007 izjavila, da se predlog iz točke 1 omejuje na jasno in enostavno kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, ki jih ta kodifikacija zadeva.
In its opinion of 20 December 2006 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena na podlagi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, je v svojem mnenju z dne 20. decembra 2006 izjavila, da se predlog iz točke 1 omejuje na jasno in enostavno kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, ki jih ta kodifikacija zadeva.
In its opinion of 21 November 2007 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena na podlagi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, je v svojem mnenju z dne 21. novembra 2007 izjavila, da se predlog iz točke 1 omejuje na jasno in enostavno kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, ki jih ta kodifikacija zadeva.
In its opinion of 22 October 2008, the High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens pointed to the large potential for administrative burden reduction in the area of invoicing and endorsed the principle of equal treatment of electronic and paper invoices by tax authorities.
Skupina neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani za upravne obremenitve na visoki ravni je v mnenju z dne 22. oktobra 2008 poudarila veliko možnost za zmanjšanje upravnih obremenitev na področju izdajanja računov in potrdila načelo, da morajo davčne uprave enako obravnavati elektronske in papirne račune.
In its opinion of 23 October 2014 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that at the date on which the proposal referred to in point 1 was submitted by the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council it confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
V svojem mnenju [mnenje je trenutno v postopku podpisa s strani treh pravnih svetovalcev] je posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, potrdila, da se je na dan, ko je Komisija predlog iz točke 1 posredovala Evropskemu parlamentu in Sveta, omejila na zgolj kodifikacijo brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, na katere se nanaša.
In its opinion of 24 September 2003, the EESC noted a wholes series of weaknesses in the draft Treaty, including the following:
EESO je v mnenju z dne 24. septembra 2003 opozoril na vrsto vrzeli v osnutku pogodbe, zlasti na:
In its opinion of 24 September 20034, the EESC noted a wholes series of weaknesses in the Constitutional Treaty, including the following:
EESO je v mnenju z dne 24. septembra 20035 opozoril na vrsto vrzeli v osnutku ustavne pogodbe, zlasti na:
In its opinion of 26 April 2001, the Committee stated that "information regarding the asylum applicant's country of origin and the transit countries he has crossed [should] also be able to be provided by organisations which are recognised as representing civil society and which are active in the Member State examining the asylum application"8.
Odbor je v svojem mnenju z dne 26. aprila 2001 izrazil upanje, da te "podatke o državi izvora prosilca za azil in o tranzitnih državah, ki jih je prečkal, [lahko] zagotovijo tudi organizacije, ki ustrezno zastopajo civilno družbo in so dejavne v državi članici, ki preučuje prošnjo za azil8".
In its opinion of 26 April 2001, the Committee stated that "information regarding the asylum applicant's country of origin and the transit countries he has crossed [should] also be able to be provided by organisations which are recognised as representing civil society and which are active in the Member State examining the asylum application"8.
Odbor je v svojem mnenju z dne 26. aprila 2001 izrazil upanje, da te „podatke o državi izvora prosilca za azil in o tranzitnih državah, ki jih je prečkal, [lahko] zagotovijo tudi organizacije, ki ustrezno zastopajo civilno družbo in so dejavne v državi članici, ki preučuje prošnjo za azil8“.
In its opinion of 26 October 200610, the EESC clearly supported the concern expressed by the Commission in its Green Paper on actions for damages where there was a breach of the EC antitrust rules and confirmed the importance of having effective means of redress for victims of breaches of anti-trust rules in its opinion of 25 March 200911.
V mnenju z dne 26. oktobra 200610 je izrecno podprl pomisleke, ki jih je Komisija izrazila v zeleni knjigi o tožbah za denarne odškodnine zaradi kršenja protimonopolnih pravil ES, ter v mnenju z dne 25. marca 200911 potrdil pomen učinkovitih mehanizmov odškodnin za žrtve kršitev protimonopolnih pravil.
In its opinion of 26 October 200610, the EESC clearly supported the concern expressed by the Commission in its Green Paper on actions for damages where there was a breach of the EC antitrust rules and confirmed the importance of having effective means of redress for victims of breaches of anti-trust rules in its opinion of 25 March 200911.
V mnenju z dne 26. oktobra 200610 je izrecno podprl zaskrbljenost, ki jo je Komisija izrazila v zeleni knjigi o tožbah za denarne odškodnine zaradi kršenja protimonopolnih pravil ES, ter v mnenju z dne 25. marca 200911 potrdil pomen učinkovitih mehanizmov odškodnin za žrtve kršitev protimonopolnih pravil.
In its opinion of 26 October 2006 (INT/306), the EESC states, inter alia, that the aim is to ensure the effective protection of everyone concerned by the European Single Market.
EESO v svojem nedavnem mnenju INT/306 med drugim trdi, da je cilj zaščita vseh udeleženih akterjev na notranjem trgu.
In its opinion of 27 February 2008 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena na podlagi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, je v svojem mnenju z dne 27. februarja 2008 izjavila, da se zgoraj omenjeni predlog omejuje na jasno in enostavno kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, ki jih ta kodifikacija zadeva.
In its opinion of 27.9.2007 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts5 stated that the proposal referred to in point 2 confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena na podlagi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil5, je v svojem mnenju z dne 27. septembra 2007 izjavila, da se predlog, omenjen v točki 2, omejuje na jasno in enostavno kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, ki jih ta kodifikacija zadeva.
In its opinion of 28 November 2001, the Committee stated that the "possibility of access to the labour market is clearly of material and moral benefit to both asylum seeker and host country"17; the EESC reiterates this statement and stresses that asylum seekers must have access to training, language courses and health care in particular.
Odbor v svojem mnenju z dne 28. novembra 2001 ocenjuje, da "ima možnost, ki je dana tem prosilcem, da dostopajo do trga dela, očitne materialne in moralne koristi za državo gostiteljico in prosilce za azil17"; to ugotovitev ponavlja in vztraja, da morajo imeti prosilci za azil pravico dostopa do usposabljanja, jezikovnih tečajev in zlasti do zdravstvene oskrbe.
In its opinion of 28 November 2001, the Committee stated that the "possibility of access to the labour market is clearly of material and moral benefit to both asylum seeker and host country"17; the EESC reiterates this statement and stresses that asylum seekers must have access to training, language courses and health care in particular.
Odbor v svojem mnenju z dne 28. novembra 2001 ocenjuje, da „ima možnost, ki je dana tem prosilcem, da dostopajo do trga dela, očitne materialne in moralne koristi za državo gostiteljico in prosilce za azil17“; to ugotovitev ponavlja in vztraja, da morajo imeti prosilci za azil pravico dostopa do usposabljanja, jezikovnih tečajev in zlasti do zdravstvene oskrbe.
In its opinion of 29 September 2003 the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the above proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina pravnih služb, ustanovljena na podlagi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, je v svojem mnenju z dne 29. septembra 2003 izjavila, da se zgoraj omenjeni predlog omejuje na jasno in enostavno kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, ki jih ta kodifikacija zadeva.
In its opinion of 7 November 2003, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal referred to in point 1 confined itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina, ustanovljena na podlagi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 o pospešenem načinu dela za uradno kodifikacijo zakonodajnih besedil2, je v svojem mnenju z dne 7. novembra 2003 izjavila, da se zgoraj omenjeni predlog omejuje na jasno in enostavno kodifikacijo, brez vsebinskih sprememb aktov, ki jih ta kodifikacija zadeva.
In its opinion of December 20061 the Committee recommended activities at European level to raise awareness of the importance of volunteering.
Odbor je v svojem mnenju iz decembra 20061 priporočil dejavnosti na evropski ravni za krepitev ozaveščenosti o pomembnosti prostovoljstva.
In its opinion on e-Europe: an Information Society for All of 24 January 20016 the Committee concluded that "not a single European citizen, regardless of the level of schooling reached, or company of any size, should be able to deny having had the opportunity or the possibility to acquaint themselves with the information society".
V svojem mnenju o e-Evropi Informacijska družba za vsakogar z dne 24. januarja 20016 je Odbor zaključil, da "se niti en prebivalec Evrope, ne glede na izobrazbo in velikost podjetja ne sme pritožiti, da ni imel možnosti spoznati informacijske družbe ".
In its Opinion on New Trade agreements negotiations (CESE 773/2008) in April 2008, the Committee made it clear that in these as well as other negotiations foreseen in its "Global Europe" Communication, the Commission should make the 27 conventions listed by the GSP Plus system "represent the minimum threshold for discussing the Sustainable development chapter in the negotiations with the Asian countries".
V mnenju o pogajanjih o novih trgovinskih sporazumih (CESE 773/2008) iz aprila 2008 je Odbor jasno izrazil svoje stališče, da bi morala Komisija pri teh in tudi vseh ostalih pogajanjih, ki jih je predvidela v sporočilu z naslovom Globalna Evropa, zagotoviti, da je 27 konvencij, ki jih navaja sistem GSP Plus, "minimalni predpogoj za razpravo o poglavju o trajnostnem razvoju pri pogajanjih z azijskimi državami".
In its Opinion on the 2003 update of the stability programme of France6, the Council reaffirmed and further clarified these conclusions.
Svet je te sklepe nadalje razjasnil in znova potrdil v svojem mnenju glede posodobitve programa stabilnosti Francije6.
In its opinion on the effects of digitalisation upon the service sector and employment in the context of industrial change (CCMI/136), the EESC formulated a series of recommendations to make sure that changes to the digital sector do not affect the efficiency of the existing systems of vocational education, job protection, social security and taxation.
EESO je v mnenju CCMI/136 o vplivu digitalizacije na storitveni sektor in zaposlovanje v okviru industrijskih sprememb podal vrsto priporočil, s katerimi želi preprečiti, da bi digitalizacija spodkopala učinkovitost obstoječih sistemov poklicnega izobraževanja, zaščite delovnih mest in socialnega varstva ter davčnih sistemov.
In its opinion on the Green Paper,1, the Committee proposed that "asylum seekers should be free to choose in which country to submit their asylum applications and that, for this reason, Member States should apply forthwith the humanitarian clause set out in Article 15(1) of the Regulation".
Odbor v mnenju o zeleni knjigi 1 "priporoča, da se prosilcu za azil omogoči, da se prosto odloči, v kateri državi bo vložil svojo prošnjo, in da se s tega vidika države članice že zdaj spodbuja k izvajanju humanitarne določbe iz člena 15(1) Uredbe".
In its opinion on the Green Paper,6, the Committee proposed that "asylum seekers should be free to choose in which country to submit their asylum applications and that, for this reason, Member States should apply forthwith the humanitarian clause set out in Article 15(1) of the Regulation" thus speeding up the examination of claims and relieving bureaucratic congestion in the countries of entry.
Odbor je v mnenju o zeleni knjigi o prihodnjem skupnem evropskem azilnem sistemu6 priporočil, "da se prosilcu za azil omogoči, da se prosto odloči, v kateri državi bo vložil svojo prošnjo, in da se s tega vidika države članice že zdaj spodbuja k izvajanju humanitarne določbe iz člena 15(1) Uredbe".
In its opinion on the Green Paper11, the Committee notes that "asylum seekers should be free to choose in which country to submit their asylum applications and that, for this reason, Member States should apply forthwith the humanitarian clause set out in Article 15(1) of the Regulation".
Odbor v mnenju o zeleni knjigi11 "priporoča, da se prosilcu za azil omogoči, da se prosto odloči, v kateri državi bo vložil svojo prošnjo, in da se s tega vidika države članice že zdaj spodbuja k izvajanju humanitarne določbe iz člena 15(1) Uredbe".
In its Opinion the Article 31 Group of Experts also suggests maintaining the text of Article 54 of Directive 96/29/Euratom, which allows Member States to opt out from the uniform Basic Safety Standards and introduce stricter dose limits to reflect possible new scientific findings after the adoption of the directive.
Skupina izvedencev iz člena 31 prav tako predlaga ohranitev besedila člena 54 Direktive 96/29/Euratom, ki omogoča državam članicam, da izključijo enotne temeljne varnostne standarde in uvedejo strožje meje doz, ki bi izražale morebitne nove znanstvene ugotovitve po sprejetju direktive.
In its opinion, EFSA considered all the specific questions and concerns raised by the Member States in the context of the consultation of the national competent authorities as provided for by Articles 6(4) and 18(4) of that Regulation.
EFSA je v svojem mnenju proučila vsa specifična vprašanja in pomisleke držav članic v okviru posvetovanja z nacionalnimi pristojnimi organi, določenega v členu 6(4) in 18(4) navedene uredbe.
In its opinion30 on the proposal for a Council Decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States31, the Committee of the Regions acknowledged that ‘while these employment guidelines are addressed to Member States, the Europe 2020 Strategy should be implemented in partnership with the local and regional authorities, which, considering their competences and capacities in the fields covered by these guidelines and according to the principle of subsidiarity, are essential for designing and implementing National Reform Programmes and for overall communication on the Strategy.’32
V svojem mnenju30 o predlogu sklepa Sveta o smernicah za politike zaposlovanja držav članic31 je Odbor regij ugotovil, „da so sicer smernice zaposlovanja naslovljene na države članice, vendar je treba strategijo Evropa 2020 izvajati v partnerstvu z lokalnimi in regionalnimi oblastmi, ki so glede na svoje izkušnje in zmogljivosti na področjih, na katera se nanašajo smernice, in v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti nepogrešljive pri pripravi in izvajanju nacionalnih programov reform ter pri splošnem komuniciranju o strategiji“.32
In its opinions REX/390 and REX/44914, the EESC called for the inclusion of a robust trade and sustainable development Chapter, defined as an essential component of the agreement, and therefore welcomes the comprehensive and detailed scope of the Commission proposal.
EESO je v svojih mnenjih REX/390 in REX/44914 pozval k vključitvi obsežnega poglavja o trgovini in trajnostnem razvoju, ki je opredeljeno kot ključen element sporazuma, zato pozdravlja obsežno in natančno določeno področje uporabe predloga Komisije.
In its opinions REX/390 and REX/44915, the EESC called for the inclusion of a robust trade and sustainable development Chapter, defined as an essential component of the agreement, and therefore welcomes the comprehensive and detailed scope of the Commission proposal.
EESO je v svojih mnenjih REX/390 in REX/44915 pozval k vključitvi obsežnega poglavja o trgovini in trajnostnem razvoju, ki je opredeljeno kot ključni element sporazuma, zato pozdravlja obsežno in natančno določeno področje uporabe predloga Komisije.
In its Opinions the EESC has consistently urged the Commission and the Member States to remove the barriers which hold back both the quantity and quality of R &amp; D in Europe while at the same time taking organisational, institutional and financial initiatives to promote a sufficient critical mass of R &amp; D activity in Europe.
EESO je v svojih mnenjih vztrajno pozival Komisijo in države članice, naj odstranijo ovire za obseg in kakovost raziskav in razvoja v Evropi ter naj hkrati prevzamejo organizacijske, institucionalne in finančne pobude za spodbujanje ustvarjanja zadostne kritične mase dejavnosti raziskav in razvoja v Evropi.