natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4.1 Poverty is unacceptable in 21st century Europe and represents a violation of human rights.
4.1 V Evropi 21. stoletja je revščina nesprejemljiva, saj gre za obliko kršitve človekovih pravic.
4.1 Poverty is unacceptable in 21st century Europe and represents a violation of human rights.
4.1 V Evropi 21. stoletja je revščina nesprejemljiva, saj pomeni kršitev človekovih pravic.
4.1 R &amp; I, ICT and SME development
4.1 Raziskave in inovacije, IKT in razvoj malih in srednjih podjetij
4.1 Regarding the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), it actually creates additional risk-bearing capacity in the market to support viable investment projects developed by EU steel companies.
4.1 Evropski sklad za strateške naložbe (EFSI) dejansko ustvarja dodatno sposobnost prevzemanja tveganja na trgu, da se podprejo izvedljivi naložbeni projekti, ki jih razvijajo jeklarska podjetja v EU.
4.1 Regarding the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), it actually creates additional risk-bearing capacity in the market; it is regrettable that not many companies can currently access this Fund, as steel market conditions cannot guarantee an adequate return on investment with prices at such a low level.
4.1 Evropski sklad za strateške naložbe (EFSI) dejansko ustvarja dodatno sposobnost prevzemanja tveganja na trgu; obžalovanja vredno je, da ima trenutno dostop do tega sklada le malo podjetij, saj v trenutnih razmerah na trgu jekla pri tako nizkih cenah ni mogoče zagotoviti ustrezne donosnosti naložb.
4.1 Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 has proven to be an instrument of key importance in procedural and commercial practice.
4.1 Izkazalo se je, da je Uredba (ES) št. 44/2001 ključnega pomena v postopkovni in gospodarski praksi.
4.1 Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 has proven to be an instrument of key importance in procedural and commercial practice.
4.1 Izkazalo se je, da je uredba (ES) št. 44/2001 listina, ki je ključnega pomena v postopkovni in gospodarski praksi.
4.1 Relevance and impact of the 2011-2014 work plan
4.1 Ustreznost in učinek delovnega načrta za obdobje 2011–2014
4.1 Research and development (R &amp; D)
4.1 Raziskave in razvoj (R+R)
4.1 Some 13.2 million tonnes of aquatic products are consumed annually on the EU market, of which 65% are imported, 25% come from EU commercial fishing, and only 10% from European aquaculture.
4.1 Na trgu EU se na leto poje 13,2 milijona ton proizvodov akvakulture, od tega 65 % iz uvoza, 25 % iz komercialnega ribolova EU in samo 10 % iz akvakulture EU.
4.1 The amendment of Regulation 1370/2007/EC involves mandatory tendering for rail transport, the organisation of such tendering procedures, the preparation of public transport plans and the provision of rolling stock to new entrants.
4.1 V spremenjeni Uredbi (ES) št. 1370/2007 so določeni obveznost uporabe razpisov za železniški promet, organizacija zadevnih razpisov, izdelava načrtov javnega prevoza in zagotavljanje železniškega voznega parka novim izvajalcem.
4.1 The Committee generally supports the Commission's intention to boost the R &amp; D budget available for energy research – in this case, available for ITER via Euratom.
4.1 Odbor načeloma podpira namero Komisije, da poveča proračun za raziskave in razvoj, ki je na voljo za energetske raziskave – v tem primeru za projekt ITER prek programa Euratom.
4.1 The Committee is firmly convinced that the various forms of R &amp; I partnerships are a formula for excellence with regard to development and a powerful tool to address the main issues affecting the EU's competitiveness.
4.1 EESO je trdno prepričan, da so partnerstva na področju raziskav in inovacij v vseh oblikah odličen način za razvoj in učinkovit instrument za reševanje glavnih vprašanj, ki vplivajo na konkurenčnost EU.
4.1 The Committee recalls its previous recommendations to the Commission (in the context of communication): those set out in the annex to its October 2005 opinion on "The Reflection Period: structure, themes and framework for an evaluation of the debate on the European Union" (CESE 1249/2005); its December 2005 opinion on the Commission's contribution to the reflection and beyond: Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate (CESE 1499/2005); and its July 2006 opinion on the White Paper on a European communication policy (CESE 972/2006).
4.1 Odbor opozarja na svoja prejšnja priporočila Komisiji na področju komuniciranja, zlasti na priporočila: iz priloge k mnenju iz oktobra 2005 o obdobju za razmislek – potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji (CESE 1249/2005), iz mnenja iz decembra 2005 o prispevku Komisije k obdobju razmisleka in za vnaprej – Načrt D za demokracijo, dialog in debato (CESE 1499/2005) ter iz mnenja iz julija 2006 o Beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki (CESE 972/2006).
4.1 The Committee recalls its previous recommendations to the Commission in the context of communications: those set out in the appendix to its October 2005 opinion on The Reflection Period: structure, themes and framework for an evaluation of the debate on the European Union (CESE 1249/20054), its December 2005 opinion on The Commission’s contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate (CESE 1499/20055), its July 2006 opinion on The White Paper on a European communication policy (CESE 972/20066) and the opinion adopted in April 2008 on Communicating Europe in Partnership (CESE 774/2008).
4.1 Odbor opozarja na svoja prejšnja priporočila Komisiji na področju komuniciranja, zlasti na priporočila v prilogi k mnenju iz oktobra 2005 o obdobju za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji (CESE 1249/20054), v mnenju iz decembra 2005 o prispevku Komisije k obdobju razmisleka in za vnaprej: Načrt D za demokracijo, dialog in debato (CESE 1499/20055), v mnenju iz julija 2006 o beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki (CESE 972/20066) ter v mnenju, ki ga je Odbor sprejel aprila 2008 o partnerstvu za komuniciranje o Evropi (CESE 774/2008 fin).
4.1 The Committee welcomes the clarification provided by Article 1(5) of the proposal for a Regulation that Member States may not apply restrictive measures in respect of third country economic operators, goods and services beyond those provided for in the Regulation.
4.1 Odbor podpira pojasnilo iz člena 1(5) predloga uredbe, da države članice ne smejo uporabljati nobenih omejevalnih ukrepov v zvezi z gospodarskimi subjekti, blagom in storitvami tretjih držav, ki niso določeni v tej uredbi.
4.1 The Committee would make the following specific comments about the proposal for a directive:
4.1 V predlogu direktive je treba opozoriti na:
4.1 The decision on the establishment of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking set out in COM(2007) 243 final is based on Decision 1982/2006/EEC on the 7th Framework Programme, which provides for a Community contribution towards the establishment of long-term public-private partnerships at European level in the area of scientific research.
4.1 Odločitev o ustanovitvi skupnega podjetja ARTEMIS, ki jo obravnava dokument COM(2007) 243 konč, temelji na sklepu št. 1982/2006 ES o sedmem okvirnem programu, v katerem je na področju znanstvenih raziskav predviden prispevek Skupnosti za dolgoročno ustanavljanje javno-zasebnih partnerstev na evropski ravni.
4.1 The EESC agrees that plant bio-stimulants should be included in the framework of CE marked fertilising products instead of plant protection products, amending Article 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
4.1 EESO se strinja, da bi morali rastlinski biostimulanti spadati med gnojilne proizvode z oznako CE, in ne med fitofarmacevtska sredstva (člen 46, Spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009).
4.1 The EESC fully agrees that there is a need to review the Community strategy to reduce CO2 emissions generated by road traffic, which account for some 20% of overall emissions.
4.1 EESO se povsem strinja, da je treba pregledati strategijo Skupnosti s ciljem zmanjšanja emisij CO2, ki jih povzroča promet in ki predstavljajo približno 20 % vseh emisij.
4.1 The EESC gave its opinion on COM(2002) 494 final on 26 February 20031, fully endorsing the proposals from the Commission in respect of the proposed controls on drug precursors.
4.1 EESO je 26. februarja 2003 podal mnenje o dokumentu COM(2002) 494 final1, v katerem je v celoti podprl predloge Komisije v zvezi s predlaganim nadzorom predhodnih sestavin pri prepovedanih drogah.
4.1 The EESC has already addressed the issue of agreements in the energy sector in connection with preparations for Decision No 994/2012/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council in 20121.
4.1 EESO je vprašanje sporazumov na področju energije že obravnaval leta 2012 v okviru priprave sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 994/2012/EU1.
4.1 The EESC has serious doubts about including methane (CH4) as a CO2 equivalent (see point 2.3.1) since this would involve reviewing the current rules on CO2 (Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 510/2011).
4.1 EESO ima močne dvome o vključitvi metana (CH4) kot ekvivalenta CO2 (glej točko 2.3.1), saj bi takšna izbira pomenila revizijo sedanjih predpisov o CO2 (uredb 443/2009 in 510/2011).
4.1 The EESC has serious doubts about including methane (CH4) as a CO2 equivalent (see point 2.3.1) since this would involve reviewing the current rules on CO2 (Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 and Regulation (EU) No 510/2011).
4.1 EESO ima močne dvome o vključitvi metana (CH4) kot ekvivalenta CO2 (glej točko 2.3.1), saj bi takšna izbira pomenila revizijo sedanjih predpisov o CO2 (uredb št. 443/2009 in 510/2011).
4.1 The EESC recalls and reaffirms some of the strategic considerations set out in its opinion of 24 September 200316 because it believes that the Commission’s proposal for a decision still fails to give adequate coverage to some aspects relating to the need for the new programme to:
4.1 EESO ponovno opozarja na in potrjuje strateške razmisleke iz svojega mnenja z dne 24. septembra 200316, saj je prepričan, da v predlogu za sklep Komisije še vedno niso dovolj zajeti nekateri vidiki, ki se nanašajo na potrebo, da novi program:
4.1 The EESC regrets that a significant number of Member States to whom the targets were addressed have failed to comply with the performance targets without any effective legal consequences.
4.1 EESO obžaluje, da velika večina držav članic, ki naj bi izpolnile cilje glede uspešnosti, tega niso storile, in sicer brez kakršnih koli dejanskih pravnih posledic.
4.1 The EESC regrets that a significant number of Member States to whom the targets were addressed have failed to comply with the performance targets without any effective legal consequences.
4.1 EESO obžaluje, da velika večina držav članic, ki naj bi izpolnile cilje glede uspešnosti, tega niso storile, kar zanje ni imelo nikakršnih dejanskih pravnih posledic.
4.1 The EESC welcomed the European Disability Strategy 2010-2020 in its resolution of 21 September 2011, as a key political tool for implementing the UN CRPD in the European Union, while calling on the European Commission to ensure that existing and future secondary legislation respects the UN CRPD and provides for the participation and involvement of persons with disabilities9.
4.1 EESO je v resoluciji z dne 21. septembra 2011 pozdravil evropsko strategijo o invalidnosti za obdobje 2010–2020 kot eno od glavnih političnih orodij za izvajanje Konvencije o pravicah invalidov v EU, ter pozval Evropsko komisijo, naj zagotovi skladnost obstoječe in prihodnje sekundarne zakonodaje s konvencijo ter predvidi udeležbo in sodelovanje invalidov9.
4.1 The EESC welcomes the Communication, which not only confirms many of the CARS 21 recommendations in its action plan, but also undertakes to continue dialogue with CARS 21 participants to ensure that the implementation of the plan's recommendations is monitored and evaluated at regular intervals, and updated if necessary.
4.1 EESO pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije, ki v svojem akcijskem načrtu ne le pritrjuje številnim priporočilom skupine CARS 21, temveč si prizadeva tudi za nadaljevanje dialoga z udeleženci skupine CARS 21, da bi redno spremljala in ocenjevala izvajanje priporočil iz načrta ter jih po potrebi posodabljala.
4.1 The EESC welcomes the fact that capacity released on the 700 MHz band is being allocated for the provision of wireless broadband electronic communications services, whilst maintaining sufficient capacity for digital terrestrial television.
4.1 EESO veseli, da se proste zmogljivosti v 700-megaherčnem pasu dodeljujejo brezžičnim širokopasovnim komunikacijskim storitvam, pri čemer se ohranja dovolj zmogljivosti za digitalno prizemno televizijo.
4.1 The EESC welcomes the proposal to amend Council Directive 98/41/EC as a significant contribution towards the implementation of the Commission's Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT) and the programme to improve the EU's regulatory environment.
4.1 EESO predlog za spremembo Direktive Sveta 98/41/ES pozdravlja kot bistven prispevek k izvajanju programa ustreznosti in uspešnosti predpisov (REFIT), ki ga je sprejela Komisija, ter programa za izboljšanje regulativnega okolja EU.
4.1 The EU animal welfare budget (EUR 70 million per year) is in clear contrast to the investment required for its implementation, and all the more so if we add the livestock sector's legislative costs (EUR 2 800 million, according to the EUPAW evaluation).
4.1 Očitno je, da proračunska sredstva, ki jih EU nameni podpori dobremu počutju živali (70 milijonov EUR na leto), niso v skladu s podatki o naložbah, ki so potrebne za izvedbo te politike, in zlasti s stroški zakonskih predpisov za sektor živinoreje (po podatkih ocene politike EU za dobro počutje živali 2800 milijonov EUR).
4.1 The EU faces a double challenge: on the one hand, it must as soon as possible find a way out of the crisis that has caused such disruption to its economic and social system; on the other, it needs to strengthen the model of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth proposed by the Europe 2020 strategy in order to tackle the structural causes of the European system's lack of competitiveness.
4.1 EU se sooča z dvojnim izzivom: čim prej mora najti rešitev iz krize, ki je povzročila tolikšen pretres gospodarskega in družbenega sistema, hkrati pa mora okrepiti model pametne, trajnostne in vključujoče rasti, ki je predlagan v strategiji Evropa 2020, da bi odpravila strukturne probleme, ki so krivi za pomanjkanje konkurenčnosti evropskega sistema.
4.1 The EU faces a double challenge: on the one hand, it must as soon as possible find a way out of the crisis that has caused such disruption to its economic and social system; on the other, it needs to strengthen the model of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth proposed by the Europe 2020 strategy in order to tackle the structural causes of the European system's lack of competitiveness.
4.1 EU se sooča z dvojnim izzivom: čim prej mora najti rešitev iz krize, ki je povzročila tolikšen pretres gospodarskega in družbenega sistema, hkrati pa mora okrepiti model pametne, trajnostne in vključujoče rasti, ki je predlagan v strategiji Evropa 2020, da bi odpravila strukturne probleme, ki so krivi za premajhno konkurenčnost evropskega sistema.
4.1 The Europe 2020 strategy was agreed with the aim of stimulating smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
4.1 Namen strategije Evropa 2020 je spodbuditi pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast.
4.1 The European Union can contribute to the development of quality education and training by encouraging cooperation between Member States and, if necessary, by supporting and supplementing their activities (Articles 149 and 150 of the Treaty).
4.1 Evropska unija lahko pripomore k razvoju kakovosti izobraževanja in usposabljanja tako, da spodbuja sodelovanje med državami članicami ter po potrebi podpira in povezuje njihove dejavnosti (člena 149 in 150 Pogodbe).
4.1 The first meeting of the new European Migration Forum took place in Brussels on 26‑27 January 2015, under the heading “Safe routes, safe futures: How to manage the mixed flows of migrants across the Mediterranean?”.
4.1 Prvo srečanje novega Evropskega foruma za migracije je potekalo 26. in 27. januarja 2015 v Bruslju z naslovom "Varne poti, varna prihodnost: kako obvladovati različne tokove priseljencev v Sredozemlju?".
4.1 The following comments are based on the content of chapters 4-6 of the above-mentioned opinion on the 7th R &amp; D framework programme, and are difficult to understand without reference to that document.
4.1 Naslednje ugotovitve temeljijo na vsebini poglavij 4–6 prej omenjenega mnenja o sedmem okvirnem programu za raziskave in razvoj in so brez sklicevanja na ta dokument težko razumljive.
4.1 The guidelines provide a wide of options for the promotion of R &amp; D via tax incentives.
4.1 Smernice omogočajo številne možnosti za spodbujanje raziskav in razvoja s pomočjo davčnih olajšav.
4.1 The guidelines provide a wide range of options for the promotion of R &amp; D via tax incentives.
4.1 Smernice omogočajo številne možnosti za spodbujanje raziskav in razvoja s pomočjo davčnih olajšav.
4.1 The horizontal social clause (Article 9 TFEU) is one of the Lisbon treaty's main social policy innovations, whose potential needs to be used to the full.
4.1 Horizontalna socialna klavzula (člen 9 PDEU) je ena od osrednjih novosti Lizbonske pogodbe na področju socialne politike, katere možnosti je treba v celoti izkoristiti.
4.1 The main challenge facing the EU tuna fleet and industry is unfair competition from other operators who have focused their growth targets on the European market, which consumes 50% of world (EU + third countries) canned tropical tuna production.
4.1 Glavni izziv evropske flote in industrije tunov je nelojalna konkurenca drugih akterjev, ki so svoj cilj rasti usmerili v evropski trg, na katerem se zaužije 50 % svetovne proizvodnje (EU in tretje države) konzerviranega tropskega tuna.
4.1 The proposed Regulation sets out the "tasks of the European Regional Development Fund".
4.1 Predlagana uredba opredeli "naloge Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj".
4.1 The provision made in Article 112b (3), according to which a product shall be considered as conforming to the general marketing standard where the product intended to be marketed is in conformity with an applicable standard adopted by any of the international organisations listed in Annex XIIb, appears inconsistent.
4.1 V zvezi z uresničevanjem cilja politike kakovosti se zdi, da ni dosledna določba člena 112b (3), po kateri je proizvod, namenjen trženju, a priori v skladu s splošnim tržnim standardom, če je v skladu z ustreznim veljavnim standardom, ki ga je sprejela ena od mednarodnih organizacij iz priloge XIIb.
4.1 The results of the recent public consultation on the Europe 2020 strategy18 show that, as regards employment, R &amp; D and poverty, the EU is a long way from achieving the objectives set.
4.1 Rezultati nedavnega javnega posvetovanja o strategiji Evropa 202018 kažejo, da je, kar zadeva zaposlovanje, raziskave in razvoj ter revščino, EU še daleč od zastavljenih ciljev.
4.1 The rules on suspending the assessment period and their link with the provision of additional information should be more precise; information considered to be incomplete may be a reason for rejecting a bid; such requests should not be able to be used as a pretext for an unjustified rejection: additional information should not therefore exceed the list drawn up beforehand or impose additional conditions.
4.1 Določbe o prekinitvi ocenjevalnega obdobja in njihovo povezanost z zagotavljanjem dodatnih informacij bi bilo treba bolj natančno pojasniti; nepopolne informacije so dejansko lahko razlog za zavrnitev zahtevka; te zahteve ne bi smeli služiti kot podlaga za neupravičeno zavrnitev: informacije se ne bi smela nanašati na elemente, ki jih ni na vnaprej pripravljenem seznamu, niti bi se smeli postavljati dodatni pogoji.
4.1 The strategy is based on the fact that the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU makes no reference to a common EU forest policy and that, thus, the control over forestry policies remains with the Member States.
4.1 Strategija izhaja iz tega, da v Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije skupna politika EU na področju gozdov ni omenjena, zato nadzor nad gozdarskimi politikami ostaja v pristojnosti držav članic.
4.1 The title of and introduction to the Green Paper give the impression of a global approach designed to make the energy networks more secure and sustainable.
4.1 Naslov in uvod v zeleni knjigi dajeta vtis, da gre za globalni pristop, katerega cilj so bolj varna in trajnostna energetska omrežja.
4.1 The treatment of tax relief on cross-border losses for firms and groups is mainly based on the ECJ decision in the Marks and Spencer case.
4.1 Obravnava izgub podjetij ali koncernov v čezmejnih primerih temelji predvsem na sodbi Sodišča ES v zadevi Marks &amp; Spencer.
4.1 The “masterfile” should follow the economic reality of the business and provide a “blueprint” of the MNE group and its transfer pricing system that would be relevant and available to all EU Member States concerned.
4.1 „Masterfile“ mora odsevati gospodarsko stanje podjetja in prikazati „program dela“ skupine mednarodnih podjetij in njen sistem transfernih cen, ki je pomemben in razpoložljiv za vse udeležene države članice EU.
4.1 With regard to scope (Article 3), the proposal not only refers to the social legislation within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, but also, in Article 3(4), gives Member States the option of requiring the installation of recording equipment in all vehicles, including those under 3.5 tonnes.
4.1 Kar zadeva področje uporabe (člen 3), se predlog sklicuje na področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006, ki se nanaša na socialno zakonodajo, poleg tega pa državam članicam v odstavku 4 omogoča, da za vsa vozila, torej tudi vozila, lažja od 3,5 tone, predpišejo tahograf.
4.1 With the internet clearly set to be a growth area for Europe, our 2020 targets include ensuring that all Europeans have access to broadband by 2020 and that 50% of the public are making online purchases by 2015.
4.1 Internet bo očitno področje rasti v Evropi, zato je eden od naših ciljev za leto 2020, da se vsem Evropejcem do leta 2020 zagotovi dostop do širokopasovnih omrežij in da do leta 2015 50 % državljanov opravlja nakupe po spletu.
4.1.1 Delays in launching the FEAD support mechanisms and insufficient information for the general public and target groups about the fund’s objectives and opportunities for using the programme.
4.1.1 zamude pri uvajanju podpornih mehanizmov FEAD in nezadostna obveščenost javnosti ter ciljnih skupin o ciljih sklada in možnostih za izkoristek sredstev;
4.1.1 Emissions from international (and national) aviation as well as from maritime transport are an increasing source of global emissions – GHG emissions from international aviation have grown 4.5% per annum between 1990 and 2004, while emissions from international maritime transport has increased by 2.75% per annum over the same period.
4.1.1 Emisije mednarodnega (in nacionalnega) letalskega ter pomorskega prometa se v vsem svetu povečujejo: količina emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki jih povzroča mednarodno letalstvo, se je v obdobju 1990–2004 povečevala za 4,5 % letno, količina emisij mednarodnega pomorskega prometa pa v istem obdobju za 2,75 % letno.
4.1.1 Emissions from international (and national) aviation as well as from maritime transportare an increasing source of global emissions – GHG emissions from international aviation have grown 4.5% per annum between 1990 and 2004, while emissions from international maritime transport has increased by 2.75% per annum over the same period4.
4.1.1 Emisije mednarodnega (in nacionalnega) letalskega ter pomorskega prometa se v vsem svetu povečujejo: količina emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki jih povzroča mednarodno letalstvo, se je v obdobju 1990–2004 povečala za 4,5 % letno, količina emisij mednarodnega pomorskega prometa pa v istem obdobju za 2,75 % letno4.