natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Figure 1Percentage of selected European sea basins that have not been surveyed10
Slika 1: Odstotek izbranih evropskih morskih bazenov, ki niso bili raziskani10
Figure 2 - Evolution of intra-EU trade (exports, 2000=100) in selected manufacturing sectors in relation to manufacturing gross value added - Source: Eurostat
Slika 2 – Razvoj trgovine znotraj EU (izvoz, 2000 = 100) v izbranih proizvodnih sektorjih glede na bruto dodano vrednost proizvodnje – Vir: Eurostat
Figure 2 :
Slika 2:
Figure 2 below shows that while expenditure on each of these aspects has varied, overall spending has gone up consistently in the years since the programme’s inception.
Slika 2 prikazuje, da se je kljub različnim izdatkom za posamezne navedene vidike od uvedbe programa skupna poraba z leti enakomerno povečevala.
Figure 2 presents the correlation between the reduction of income inequality and social expenditure.
Razpredelnica 2 predstavlja korelacijo med zmanjšanjem dohodkovne neenakosti in socialnimi odhodki.
Figure 2 shows the geographic coverage for this period.
Na sliki 2 je prikazana geografska pokritost za to obdobje.
Figure 2 – Comparative projections between fishing mortality, spawning stock biomass (SSB), yield in value and operational profits.
Slika 2 – Primerjalne napovedi za ribolovno umrljivost, biomaso drstitvenega staleža (SSB), donos vrednosti in dobiček iz poslovanja.
Figure 20: Electronic submission of claims (0 = available in 0% of courts; 4 = available in 100% of courts) (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 20: Elektronska vložitev zahtevkov (0 = na voljo pri 0 % sodišč, 4 = na voljo pri 100 % sodišč) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 20: Income threshold for legal aid in a specific consumer case* (differences in % between Eurostat poverty threshold and the income threshold) (source: European Commission with the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE)38)
Slika 20: Dohodkovni prag za pravno pomoč v posebni potrošniški zadevi* (razlike med Eurostatovim pragom revščine in dohodkovnim pragom v %) (vir: Evropska komisija in Svet odvetniških združenj Evrope (CCBE)38)
Figure 20: Unadjusted gender pay gap in 2008 and 2014
Slika 20: Neprilagojena plačna vrzel leta 2008 in leta 2014
Figure 21: Availability of alternative dispute resolution methods in 2012* (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 21: Razpoložljivost alternativnih načinov reševanja sporov leta 2012* (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 21: Electronic submission of claims* (0 = available in 0% of courts, 4 = available in 100% of courts43) (source: CEPEJ study)
Slika 21: Elektronska vložitev zahtevkov* (0 = na voljo pri 0 % sodišč, 4 = na voljo pri 100 % sodišč43) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 21: Long-term unemployment rates (% of the active population), 2014 and 2015
Slika 21: Stopnje dolgotrajne brezposelnosti (v % aktivnega prebivalstva), leti 2014 in 2015
Figure 22: Benchmarking of small claims procedures online (source: 13th eGovernment Benchmarking Report, study being prepared for the European Commission, Directorate-General Communications Networks, Content and Technology)44
Slika 22: Primerjalna analiza spletnih postopkov v sporih majhne vrednosti (vir: 13. primerjalno poročilo o e-upravi, študija, ki se pripravlja za Generalni direktorat Evropske komisije za komunikacijska omrežja, vsebine in tehnologijo)44
Figure 22: Compulsory training for judges in 2012* (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 22: Obvezno usposabljanje za sodnike leta 2012* (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 23 - Use of PES in job search and share of unemployed jobseekers, 2014
Slika 23: Uporaba javnih zavodov za zaposlovanje pri iskanju zaposlitve in delež brezposelnih iskalcev zaposlitve, 2014
Figure 23: Electronic communication (0 = available in 0% of courts, 4 = available in 100% of courts47) (source: CEPEJ study)
Slika 23: Elektronsko komuniciranje (0 = na voljo pri 0 % sodišč, 4 = na voljo pri 100 % sodišč47) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 23: Judges participating in continuous training activities in EU Law or in the law of another Member State (as a % of total number or judges )* ( source: European Commission, European Judicial Training, 201238)
Graf 23: Sodniki, ki se udeležujejo nenehnega usposabljanja na področju zakonodaje EU ali zakonodaje druge države članice (v % vseh sodnikov)* (vir: Evropska komisija, Evropsko izobraževanje v pravosodju, 201238)
Figure 24: Activation support (LMP participants per 100 persons wanting to work) and long-term unemployment rates by Member State, 2014
Slika 24: Stopnje aktivacijske podpore (delež udeležencev v politikah trga dela med 100 osebami, ki želijo delati) in dolgotrajne brezposelnosti po državah članicah, 2014
Figure 24: Budget for courts (in EUR per inhabitant)* (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 24: Proračun za sodišča (v EUR na prebivalca)* (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 24: Relations between courts and the press/media* (source: European Commission48)
Slika 24: Odnosi med sodišči in mediji* (vir: Evropska komisija48)
Figure 25 also includes probation systems and legal aid.40
Graf 25 vključuje tudi sisteme za pogojno obsodbo in pravno pomoč.40
Figure 25: Access to published judgments online* (civil and commercial and administrative cases, all instances) (source: European Commission49)
Slika 25: Spletni dostop do objavljenih sodb* (civilne/gospodarske in upravne zadeve, vse stopnje) (vir: Evropska komisija49)
Figure 25: General Government total expenditure on "law courts"* (in EUR per inhabitant) (source: Eurostat)
Graf 25: Splošni skupni državni izdatki za „sodišča“* (v EUR na prebivalca) (vir: Eurostat)
Figure 25: Share of temporary employment (2015) and transition rates from temporary to permanent contracts (2014-15)
Slika 25: Delež zaposlitev za določen čas (2015) in stopnje prehajanja iz začasne v stalno zaposlitev (2014–2015)
Figure 26: Arrangements for online publication of judgments in all instances* – civil/commercial and administrative cases (source: European Commission50)
Slika 26: Načini spletnega objavljanja sodb na vseh stopnjah* – civilne/gospodarske in upravne zadeve (vir: Evropska komisija50)
Figure 26: Change of GDHI in 2015, as reported in the scoreboard of key employment and social indicators
Slika 26: Sprememba bruto razpoložljivega dohodka gospodinjstev leta 2015, kot je razvidna iz pregleda ključnih zaposlitvenih in socialnih kazalnikov
Figure 26: General government expenditure on law courts as a percentage of GDP (source: Eurostat)41
Graf 26: Splošni državni izdatki za sodišča kot odstotek BDP (vir: Eurostat)41
Figure 27 covers any method for resolving disputes other than litigation in courts.
Na sliki 27 so zajeti vsi načini zunajsodnega reševanja sporov.
Figure 27: Income inequality (S80/S20 measure), as reported in the scoreboard of key employment and social indicators
Slika 27: Dohodkovna neenakost (razmerje kvintilnih razredov), kot je razvidna iz pregleda ključnih zaposlitvenih in socialnih kazalnikov
Figure 27: Number of judges* (per 100.000 inhabitants) (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 27: Število sodnikov* (na 100 000 prebivalcev) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 28: At-risk-of-poverty rates in working age (18-64), as reported in the scoreboard of key employment and social indicators
Slika 28: Stopnje tveganja revščine delovno sposobnega prebivalstva (18–64 let), kot so razvidne iz pregleda ključnih zaposlitvenih in socialnih kazalnikov
Figure 28: General government total expenditure on law courts*
Slika 28: Splošni skupni državni izdatki za sodišča
Figure 28: Number of lawyers *(per 100.000 inhabitants) (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 28: Število odvetnikov* (na 100 000 prebivalcev) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 29: General government expenditure on law courts* (as a percentage of gross domestic product) (source: Eurostat)
Slika 29: Splošni državni izdatki za sodišča* (kot delež BDP) (vir: Eurostat)
Figure 29: Perceived judicial independence
Graf 29: Videz neodvisnosti pravosodja
Figure 29: Self-reported unmet needs for medical examination, 2011 and 2014
Slika 29: Neizpolnjene potrebe po zdravstveni oskrbi (po lastnem poročanju), leti 2011 in 2014
Figure 2: amenable mortality, standardised death rates per 100 000 inhabitants — 2010
Graf 2: Preprečljiva umrljivost, standardizirane stopnje umrljivosti na 100 000 prebivalcev – leto 2010
Figure 2: Area of cogeneration unit
Slika 2: Območje naprave za soproizvodnjo
Figure 2: Budget allocation to IT systems, 2008-2013
Slika 2: Dodelitev proračunskih sredstev za sisteme IT, 2008–2013
Figure 2: Compliance results per Member State for Articles 3 of the UWWTD (collection), 4 (secondary treatment), and 5 (more stringent treatment).
Slika 2: Rezultati skladnosti po državah članicah v zvezi s členi 3 (kanalizacija), 4 (sekundarno čiščenje) in 5 (strožje čiščenje) direktive o čiščenju komunalne odpadne vode.
Figure 2: Ease of Doing Business Ranking, 2009
Slika 2 Razvrstitev glede na enostavnost poslovanja, 2009
Figure 2: Employment rate, unemployment ratio, NEET, early leavers from education and training and unemployment rate in the EU, 2008-2015
Slika 2: Stopnja zaposlenosti, delež brezposelnosti, stopnja mladih, ki niso zaposleni, se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo (NEET), stopnja zgodnjega opuščanja izobraževanja in usposabljanja ter stopnja brezposelnosti v EU v obdobju 2008–2015
Figure 2: Employment rates and employment growth across different groups in the EU
Slika 2: Stopnje zaposlenosti in rast zaposlovanja po različnih skupinah v EU
Figure 2: Estimated spending on marine research of selected Member States and the EU (2011) Source: JPI Oceans
Slika 2: Ocena izdatkov za morske raziskave izbranih držav članic in EU (2011).
Figure 2: For L-category vehicles, trend over time in absolute and relative shares of hydrocarbon emissions, assuming no change in policy5.
Slika 2: Gibanje absolutnega in relativnega deleža emisij ogljikovodikov pri vozilih kategorije L (pri nespremenjeni politiki)5.
Figure 2: Geographic coverage of IfS crisis responses, 2007 to 2013 (as per funding allocations)
Slika 2: Geografska pokritost kriznega odzivanja v okviru instrumenta za stabilnost med letoma 2007 in 2013 (glede na dodeljena finančna sredstva)
Figure 2: Global Competitiveness Index (source: World Economic Forum)
Slika 2: Indeks svetovne konkurenčnosti (vir: Svetovni gospodarski forum)
Figure 2: Global Competitiveness Index (source: World Economic Forum)
Slika 4: Indeks svetovne konkurenčnosti (vir: Svetovni gospodarski forum)
Figure 2: GNSS R &amp; D financial needs
Slika 2: Potrebe po sredstvih R &amp; R za GNSS
Figure 2: Music downloads - US level four times bigger than the EU
Slika 2: Prenos glasbe – v ZDA štirikrat višja raven kot v EU
Figure 2: Number of incoming civil, commercial, administrative and other cases* (first instance/per 100 inhabitants) (source: CEPEJ study21)
Slika 2: Število prejetih civilnih, gospodarskih, upravnih in drugih zadev* (prva stopnja/na 100 prebivalcev) (vir: študija CEPEJ21)
Figure 2: Number of Intra-EU Takeover Deals 2003-2010
Slika 2: Število transakcij prevzema znotraj EU v obdobju 2003–2010
Figure 2: Organisational and OEF boundaries.
Slika 2: Organizacijske meje in meje okoljskega odtisa organizacij.
Figure 2: Outline of the principles of the CPA scheme
Slika 2: Pregled načel sheme klasifikacije proizvodov po dejavnosti
Figure 2: Part of Cohesion Policy in public investment
Slika 2: Del kohezijske politike v javnih naložbah
Figure 2: Potential wheat yield losses (%) in 19 EU countries (1990-2006).
Slika 2: Potencialna izguba pridelka pšenice (%) v 19 državah EU (1990–2006)
Figure 2: Primary energy consumption by fuel (Mtoe), PRIMES Reference scenario
Slika 2: Poraba primarne energije, razdeljena po gorivih (Mtoe), referenčni scenarij PRIMES
Figure 2: Reference point
Slika 2: Referenčna točka
Figure 2: Share of people suffering from severe material deprivation11 by country; 2008
Slika 2: Delež ljudi, ki trpijo hudo pomanjkanje11, po državah leta 2008
Figure 2: Time needed to resolve litigious civil and commercial cases* (1st instance/in days) (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 2: Čas, potreben za reševanje civilnih in gospodarskih pravdnih zadev* (prva stopnja/v dneh) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 2: Youth (15-24 years) unemployment rates (October 2011)
Slika 2: Stopnje brezposelnosti mladih (15–24 let) (oktober 2011)
Figure 3 - Evolution of intra-EU trade in selected manufacturing sectors (value of imports; 1999=100) - Source: Eurostat
Slika 3 – Razvoj trgovine znotraj EU v izbranih proizvodnih sektorjih (vrednost uvoza; 1999 = 100) – Vir: Eurostat
Figure 3 Projected skills gap in the offshore wind industry 2013-2030 (source TPWind survey)
Slika 3: Predvidena vrzel v spretnostih v industriji pridobivanja vetrne energije na morju za obdobje 2013–2030 (vir: raziskava TPWind)
Figure 3 shows how the composition of investment has evolved since 1989.
Na sliki 3 je prikazano, kako se je spreminjala sestava naložb od leta 1989.
Figure 3.2: R &amp; D intensity: average annual growth (%) 2000-2005 and average annual growth (%) required to meet the 2010 target
Slika 3.2: Intenzivnost R &amp; R: povprečna letna rast (v %) 2000–2005 in povprečna letna rast (v %), potrebna za doseganje ciljev 2010
Figure 30: Number of judges* (per 100 000 inhabitants) (source: CEPEJ study)
Slika 30: Število sodnikov* (na 100 000 prebivalcev) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 30: Out-of-pocket medical spending as a % of current health expenditure, 2013
Slika 30: Nepovračljivi izdatki kot % tekočih izdatkov za zdravstveno varstvo, 2013
Figure 31: Proportion of female professional judges at first and second instance and Supreme Courts (source: European Commission (Supreme Courts)53 and CEPEJ study (first and second instance))
Slika 31: Delež poklicnih sodnic na sodiščih prve in druge stopnje ter vrhovnih sodiščih (vir: Evropska komisija (vrhovna sodišča)53 in študija CEPEJ (prva in druga stopnja))
Figure 32: Variation in proportion of female professional judges at both first and second instance from 2010 to 2014 as well as at Supreme Courts from 2010 to 2015* (difference in percentage points) (source: European Commission (Supreme Courts)55 and CEPEJ study (first and second instance))
Slika 32: Sprememba deleža poklicnih sodnic na sodiščih prve in druge stopnje v obdobju 2010–2014 ter na vrhovnih sodiščih v obdobju 2010–2015* (razlika v odstotnih točkah) (vir: Evropska komisija (vrhovna sodišča)55 in študija CEPEJ (prva in druga stopnja))
Figure 33: Number of lawyers* (per 100 000 inhabitants) (source: CEPEJ study)
Slika 33: Število odvetnikov* (na 100 000 prebivalcev) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 34: Compulsory training for judges* (source: CEPEJ study56)
Slika 34: Obvezno usposabljanje za sodnike* (vir: študija CEPEJ56)
Figure 35: Judges participating in continuous training activities in EU law or in the law of another Member State* (as a percentage of total number of judges) (source: European Commission, European judicial training 201557)
Slika 35: Sodniki, ki se udeležujejo stalnega usposabljanja na področju prava EU ali prava drugih držav članic* (kot delež vseh sodnikov) (vir: Evropska komisija, Evropsko izobraževanje v pravosodju 201557)
Figure 36: Percentage of continuous judicial training activities on various types of judicial skills* (source: European Commission58)
Slika 36: Delež dejavnosti stalnega usposabljanja v pravosodju za različne vrste pravosodnih veščin* (vir: Evropska komisija58)
Figure 37: Availability of training for judges on communication with parties and the press (source: European Commission59)
Slika 37: Razpoložljivost usposabljanja sodnikov na področju komuniciranja s strankami in mediji (vir: Evropska komisija59)
Figure 38: Availability of monitoring and evaluation of court activities* (source: CEPEJ study60)
Slika 38: Razpoložljivost spremljanja in ocenjevanja dejavnosti sodišč* (vir: študija CEPEJ60)
Figure 39: ICT used for case management and for court activity statistics*
Slika 39: IKT za vodenje zadev in statistične podatke o dejavnosti sodišč
Figure 3: Changes in performance and relative innovation intensity in the Member States (source: European Commission)
Slika 6: Spremembe v uspešnosti in relativna intenzivnost inovacij v državah članicah (vir: Evropska komisija)
Figure 3: Composition of cohesion policy investment in less developed regions (1989-2013)
Slika 3: Sestava naložb na podlagi kohezijske politike v manj razvitih regijah (1989‒2013)
Figure 3: Distribution of positive and timely exits by type of offer, 2015 (%)
Slika 3: Razporeditev pozitivnih in pravočasnih izstopov po vrsti ponudbe, 2015 (v %)
Figure 3: Employment growth (2014-15) across different groups in the EU
Slika 3: Rast zaposlovanja (2014–2015) po različnih skupinah v EU
Figure 3: EU-27 fossil fuel consumption by origin in Mtoe (including bunker fuels),
Slika 3: Poraba fosilnih goriv v EU-27 glede na izvor v Mtoe (vključno z gorivi za oskrbo ladij),
Figure 3: Evolution in compliance rates since reference year 1998 (based on incomplete - data sets available).
Slika 3: Razvoj stopenj skladnosti od referenčnega leta 1998 (na podlagi nepopolnih naborov podatkov, ki so bili na voljo).
Figure 3: Geographic coverage of new IfS Crisis Responses, 2013 (as per funding allocations)
Slika 3: Geografska pokritost kriznega odzivanja v okviru novega instrumenta za stabilnost leta 2013 (glede na dodeljena finančna sredstva)
Figure 3: Impact of takeover regulation (+ relationship and intensity)
Slika 3: Vpliv ureditve prevzema (+ povezanost in intenzivnost)
Figure 3: incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases — confirmed cases per 100 000 inhabitants — 2011
Graf 3: Stopnje incidence bolezni, ki jih je mogoče preprečiti s cepljenjem – potrjeni primeri na 100 000 prebivalcev – leto 2011
Figure 3: NEET rates for the EU-28 and Member States in the second quarter of 2014 and the highest and lowest values since 2008
Slika 3: Delež mladih, ki niso zaposleni in se ne izobražujejo ali usposabljajo, za EU-28 in države članice v drugem četrtletju 2014 ter najvišje in najnižje vrednosti od leta 2008
Figure 3: Net Foreign direct investments as % of GDP, 2005-2007
Slika 3: Neto tuje neposredne naložbe v odstotkih BDP, 2005–2007
Figure 3: Number of incoming civil and commercial litigious cases* (first instance/per 100 inhabitants) (source: CEPEJ study)
Slika 3: Število prejetih civilnih in gospodarskih pravdnih zadev* (prva stopnja/na 100 prebivalcev) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 3: Overall rural development budget (EAFRD) before the HC by axis (billion EUR) and share of the uptake by end 200916
Slika 3: Skupni proračun za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) po posameznih oseh (v milijardah EUR) pred sistematskim pregledom in delež porabe do konca leta 200916
Figure 3: Participation in the joint actions
Slika 3: Udeležba v skupnih ukrepih
Figure 3: Selection of the correct system boundaries in case of auxiliary/stand by boilers (GT: Gas Turbine; G: Generator; FB: Fuel Boiler; HRB: Heat Recovery Boiler)
Slika 3 Izbira pravilnih mej sistema v primeru dodatnih/nadomestnih kotlov (PT: plinska turbina; G: generator; KG: Kotel na gorivo; KRT: kotli z rekuperacijo toplote)
Figure 3: Share of people aged 0-59 living in a jobless household12 by country; 2008
Slika 3: Delež ljudi v starosti 0–59, ki živijo v brezposelnih gospodinjstvih12, po državah leta 2008
Figure 3: Share of young people not in employment, education or training, as a percentage of the age group 15-24 in 2008 and 2010
Slika 3: Delež mladih, ki niso zaposleni in se niti ne izobražujejo niti usposabljajo, kot odstotek v starostni skupini 15–24 let leta 2008 in leta 2010
Figure 3: Soil erosion by water in the EU (t/ha/y).
Slika 3: Erozija tal zaradi vode v EU (t/ha/l)
Figure 3: Time needed to resolve administrative cases* (1st instance/in days) (source: CEPEJ study)
Graf 3: Čas, potreben za reševanje upravnih zadev* (prva stopnja/v dneh) (vir: študija CEPEJ)
Figure 3: Two-step procedure to compile the Resource Use and Emissions Profile
Slika 3: Dvofazni postopek za pripravo profila rabe virov in emisij
Figure 3: Two-step procedure to compile the Resource Use and Emissions Profile (the screening step is highly recommended, but not mandatory).
Slika 3: Dvofazni postopek za pripravo profila rabe virov in emisij (presejalni pregled je zelo priporočljiv, ni pa obvezen)
Figure 3: Unemployment rate and yearly change, as reported in the scoreboard of key employment and social indicators
Slika 3: Stopnja brezposelnosti in letna sprememba, kot sta razvidni iz pregleda ključnih zaposlitvenih in socialnih kazalnikov
Figure 3c
Slika 3c
Figure 3d
Slika 3d
Figure 4, produced by the JRC in preparation for the World Atlas of Desertification34, shows the areas where productive capacity has been constantly decreasing in the past few decades.
Na sliki 4, ki jo je pripravilo JRC za svetovni atlas dezertifikacije34, so prikazana območja, na katerih se je proizvodna zmogljivost v zadnjih nekaj desetletjih stalno zmanjševala.
Figure 40: Topics of surveys conducted among court users or legal professionals* (source: European Commission62)
Slika 40: Teme raziskav, izvedenih med uporabniki sodišč ali pravnimi strokovnjaki* (vir: Evropska komisija62)
Figure 41: Follow-up of surveys conducted among court users or legal professionals (source: European Commission63)
Slika 41: Spremljanje raziskav, izvedenih med uporabniki sodišč ali pravnimi strokovnjaki (vir: Evropska komisija63)
Figure 43 below examines six specific aspects: processing time (time limits67 and timeframes68), management of backlogs, active monitoring of cases, information to parties, judgments and allocation of human resources.
Na spodnji sliki 43 je proučenih šest posebnih vidikov: čas obravnavanja (roki67 in časovni okviri68), upravljanje sodnih zaostankov, dejavno spremljanje zadev, obveščanje strank, sodbe in dodelitev človeških virov.
Figure 44: Perceived independence of courts and judges among the general public (source: Eurobarometer76)
Slika 44: Mnenje širše javnosti o neodvisnosti sodišč in sodnikov (vir: Eurobarometer76)
Figure 45: Main reasons among the general public for the perceived lack of independence (share of all respondents — higher value means more influence) (source: Eurobarometer77)
Slika 45: Glavni razlogi za mnenje širše javnosti o pomanjkanju neodvisnosti (delež vseh anketirancev – višja vrednost pomeni večji vpliv) (vir: Eurobarometer77)
Figure 46: Perceived independence of courts and judges among companies (source: Eurobarometer79)
Slika 46: Mnenje podjetij o neodvisnosti sodišč in sodnikov (vir: Eurobarometer79)
Figure 47: Main reasons among companies for the perceived lack of independence (rate of all respondents — higher value means more influence) (source: Eurobarometer80)
Slika 47: Glavni razlogi za mnenje podjetij o pomanjkanju neodvisnosti (delež vseh anketirancev – višja vrednost pomeni večji vpliv) (vir: Eurobarometer80)
Figure 48: WEF: businesses’ perception of judicial independence* (perception — higher value means better perception) (source: World Economic Forum82)
Slika 48: WEF: mnenje podjetij o neodvisnosti sodstva* (mnenje – višja vrednost pomeni boljše mnenje) (vir: Svetovni gospodarski forum82)
Figure 49 and Figure 50 present an expanded and updated comparison of the composition (according to the nomination process) and the main powers of existing Councils in the EU.
Na slikah 49 in 50 je predstavljena razširjena in posodobljena primerjava sestave (po postopku imenovanja) in glavnih pristojnosti sedanjih sodnih svetov v EU.
Figure 49: Composition of the Councils for the Judiciary according to the nomination process*85
Slika 49: Sestava sodnih svetov po postopku imenovanja*85
Figure 4: 2010-2013 trends — % of spatial datasets with conforming metadata
Slika 4: Trendi v obdobju 2010–2013 – % zbirk prostorskih podatkov s skladnimi metapodatki
Figure 4: Allocation to funding priorities by fund (2014-20), in % of fund total
Slika 4: Dodeljevanje sredstev prednostnim nalogam po skladu (2014‒2020) v % skupne vrednosti sklada
Figure 4: Barriers to takeovers not covered by the Takeover Bids Directive.
Slika 4: Ovire za prevzeme, ki niso zajete v Direktivi o ponudbah za prevzem.
Figure 4: breast cancer screening — % of women 50-69 screened
Graf 4: Presejalni pregled za raka dojke – odstotek pregledanih žensk, starih med 50 in 69 let
Figure 4: Decision tree for handling multi-functional processes
Slika 4: Drevo odločanja za obravnavanje večfunkcionalnih postopkov