natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court considers that adaptations that may be required may not relate to the repositioning of the driver’s seat, but solely to procedures having a minimal impact.
Sodišče meni, da prilagoditve, ki jih je dopustno zahtevati, ne morejo vključevati premestitve vozniškega prostora, ampak le manjše posege.
The Court considers that all the circumstances of this case indicate that, if the future repetition of similar infringements of EU law is to be effectively prevented, such a dissuasive measure must be adopted.
Menilo je, da v tej zadevi celota elementov kaže na to, da je za učinkovito preprečitev poznejših podobnih kršitev prava Unije treba sprejeti odvračalen ukrep.
The Court considers that in order to take account of the proven duration of the infringement, which is equivalent to approximately half of the period initially determined by the Commission, the rate of increase on account of the duration of the infringement should be reduced from 50% to 25%, that is, from EUR 10 million to EUR 5 million.
ki ga je prvotno ugotovila Komisija – stopnjo povečanja zaradi trajanja kršitve zmanjšati s 50% na 25%, to je z 10 milijonov na 5 milijonov eurov.
The Court considers that requiring members of a social group sharing the same sexual orientation to conceal it is incompatible with the recognition of a characteristic so fundamental to a person’s identity that the persons concerned cannot be required to renounce it.
Ugotavlja, da je to, da se od članov družbene skupine, ki jim je skupna enaka spolna usmerjenost, zahteva, da to usmerjenost prikrivajo, v nasprotju s samim priznanjem lastnosti, ki je tako temeljnega pomena za identiteto, da od zadevnih oseb ni mogoče zahtevati, da se ji odrečejo.
The Court considers that since the proceedings were commenced before the entry into force of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), representation of the EU is governed by the Treaty Establishing the European Community (EC).
Sodišče v zvezi s tem meni, da je glede na to, da je bil postopek uveden pred začetkom veljave Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), zastopanje Unije urejeno v Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (ES).
The Court considers that sufficient safeguards should be provided to address these barriers.
Po mnenju Sodišča bi bilo treba zagotoviti zadostna varovala za premoščanje teh ovir.
The Court considers that the Commission's approach compares favourably to other impact assessment systems and is on several aspects good practice within the EU.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je pristop Komisije uspešen v primerjavi z drugimi sistemi za oceno učinka ter da iz več vidikov pomeni dobro prakso v EU.
The Court considers that the draft provisions dealing with “withdrawals”, “reductions” and “exclusion” of payments in the Member States are confusing both in their wording and their scope.
Sodišče meni, da ubeseditev in področje uporabe osnutkov določb o „ukinitvah“,
The Court considers that the shortcomings highlighted by its audit need to be remedied in order to provide sufficient assurance that the system is operating effectively and ensure that consumer confidence is not undermined.
Sodišče meni, da je treba odpraviti pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je pokazala ta revizija, da se pridobi zadostno zagotovilo o uspešnem delovanju sistema in da se zaupanje potrošnikov ne bo zmanjšalo.
The Court considers that the systems for calculating entitlements were only partially effective and that they do not yet provide reasonable assurance that the annual SPS payments are correct.
Vendar Sodišče meni, da so bili sistemi za izračunavanje pravic samo delno uspešni in da še ne zagotavljajo razumnega zagotovila, da so letna plačila iz SEP pravilna.
the Court considers that the United Kingdom provisions pursue legitimate objectives which are compatible with the EC Treaty and constitute overriding reasons in the public interest.
Sodišče ugotavlja, da britanska zakonodaja zasleduje legitimne cilje, ki so združljivi s Pogodbo ter pomenijo nujne razloge v splošnem interesu.
The Court considers that there is no need to limit the temporal effects of this judgment.
Sodišče meni, da ni treba omejiti časovnih učinkov te sodbe.
The Court considers that there is not a sufficiently direct causal link between the forwarding of the information by OLAF to the Belgian judicial authorities and the damage claimed in order for liability to be established on that basis.
Sodišče prve stopnje meni, da ne obstaja dovolj neposredna vzročna zveza med prenosom podatkov, ki jih je OLAF poslal belgijskim sodnim organom, in zatrjevano škodo, da bi bila na tej podlagi podana nepogodbena odgovornost.
The Court considers that WIN cannot therefore rely on an absolute right to align its prices on those of its competitors in order to justify its conduct.
Sodišče prve stopnje ugotavlja, da se družba WIN za utemeljitev svojega ravnanja ne more sklicevati na brezpogojno pravico do prilagoditve cenam njenih konkurentov.
The Court considers that, between 1988 and 1995, the United Kingdom legislation did not satisfy those conditions where a DTC was not applicable.
Sodišče meni, da med letoma 1988 in 1995 britanska zakonodaja v tistih primerih, ko se ni uporabljal SDO, teh pogojev ni izpolnjevala.
The Court considers that, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, the content of the form must be adapted to the particular circumstances of the individual case, so as to enable the court to take such a decision.
V zvezi s tem je menilo, da je treba v okoliščinah, kot so te v postopku v glavni stvari, vsebino tega obrazca prilagoditi posebnim okoliščinam zadeve, tako da bo sodišče lahko sprejelo tako odločitev.
The Court considers that, in doing so, the Commission formed a view on the issue of the conformity of the new Portuguese law with EU law, even though that Portuguese law introduced a system of liability which was distinct from that of the repealed legislation and which the Court of Justice could not have examined beforehand.
Sodišče meni, da se je Komisija izrekla glede vprašanja skladnosti novega portugalskega zakona s pravom Unije, medtem ko je zadevni zakon vzpostavil nov sistem odgovornosti, ki se je razlikoval od sistema, vzpostavljenega z razveljavljenim predpisom in ki ga Sodišče prej ni moglo preučiti.
The Court considers that, with regard to tax legislation which adopts as the main distinguishing criterion the place of residence of investment funds, according to which criterion tax is or is not deducted at source on dividends paid to them by Polish companies, non‑resident investment funds are in a situation which is objectively comparable to that of investment funds whose registered office is situated in Poland.
Sodišče je menilo, da so glede davčne zakonodaje, v kateri se kot glavno razlikovalno merilo uporablja kraj sedeža investicijskih skladov, zaradi česar se od dividend, ki jih tem skladom izplačajo poljske družbe, odtegne davčni odtegljaj ali pa ne, investicijski skladi nerezidenti v objektivno primerljivem položaju kot investicijski skladi s sedežem na poljskem ozemlju.
The Court considers therefore that those measures are not compatible with the principle of proportionality.
Sodišče tako šteje, da ta ukrep ni skladen z načelom sorazmernosti.
The Court considers, first, that, taking account of the pricing principles drawn up by Microsoft and the Commission, Microsoft was in a position to assess whether the remuneration rates it was seeking up to 21 October 2007 for granting access to the interoperability information were reasonable for the purposes of the 2004 decision.
Prvič, Splošno sodišče meni, da je družba Microsoft ob upoštevanju načel ocenjevanja, ki sta jih razvili družba Microsoft in Komisija, lahko ocenila, ali so bili zneski plačil, ki jih je zahtevala do 21. oktobra 2007 za dostop do informacij o interoperabilnosti, razumni v smislu odločbe iz leta 2004.
The Court declares that Mrs Edith Cresson acted in breach of her obligations as a European commissioner
Sodišče ugotavlja, da je Édith Cresson kršila svoje obveznosti evropske komisarke
The Court declares that persons who possess the nationality of a Member State and who live or reside in a territory which is one of the OCTs may rely on the rights conferred on citizens of the Union.
Sodišče je potrdilo, da se osebe, ki imajo državljanstvo države članice in prebivajo oziroma imajo stalno prebivališče na ozemlju, ki je del ČDO, lahko sklicujejo na pravice, priznane državljanom Unije.
The Court declares the action inadmissible insofar as it concerns the Commission’s claim that it should annul the Council’s failure to adopt decisions to give notice to France and Germany.
Sodišče zavrže kot nedopustno tožbo Komisije, s katero ta predlaga, da se za nično razglasi odločitev Sveta, da naproti Nemčiji in Franciji ne bo sprejel sklepov o pozivu.
The Court defines the extent of consumer protection granted in the context of credit agreements
Sodišče pojasnjuje obseg varstva potrošnikov, zagotovljenega v okviru kreditnih pogodb
The Court devotes a number of paragraphs in the 2012 annual report to this topic.
Temu vprašanju je Sodišče v letnem poročilu za leto 2012 namenilo več odstavkov.
The Court did not give an unqualified assurance for the remaining areas of EU spending.
Sodišče za ostala področja porabe EU ni dalo izjave o zanesljivosti brez pridržkov.
The Court dismisses the action brought by Poland contesting extension of the phasing-in system for direct payments to farmers of the new member states
Sodišče je zavrnilo tožbo, ki jo je vlozila republika poljska zoper razširitev sistema postopnega uvajanja neposrednih plačil za kmete v novih državah članicah
The Court dismisses the action challenging the directive on the right to family reunification of nationals of non-member States
Sodišče je zavrnilo tožbo proti direktivi o pravici državljanov tretjih držav do združitve družine
The Court dismisses the application for annulment of the decision as regards Prym.
Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo zahtevo za razglasitev ničnosti odločbe, ki se nanaša na Prym.
The Court dismisses the Commission actions contesting the Council decisions on the grant of State aid by Lithuania, Poland, Latvia and Hungary for the purchase of agricultural land between 2010 and 2013
Sodišče je zavrnilo tožbe Komisije zoper sklepe Sveta o dodelitvi državnih pomoči s strani Litve, Poljske, Latvije in Madžarske za nakup kmetijskih zemljišč med letoma 2010 in 2013
The Court dismisses the Council’s appeal in an anti-dumping case concerning the Chinese company Xinanchem which specialises in the production of glyphosate
Sodišče je zavrnilo pritožbo Sveta v protidampinški zadevi kitajske družbe Xinanchem, ki je specializirana za proizvodnjo glifosata
The Court does not accept that argument and holds that the freedoms of movement may validly be relied on by such a proprietor in those circumstances.
Sodišče se s to trditvijo ne strinja in ugotavlja, da se tak imetnik v zvezi s tem lahko sklicuje na svoboščine v zvezi s prostim pretokom.
The Court does not exclude the possibility that those two provisions, taken individually, may operate both to the benefit and to the detriment of any shareholder in the company.
Sodišče ne izključuje, da lahko ti določbi, obravnavani posamezno, tako koristita kot škodita vsem delničarjem družbe.
The Court does not have sufficient facts before it, however, to be able to assess whether the limitation of the total number of licences is compatible with Community law.
Nasprotno pa Sodišče nima na voljo zadostnih dejstev, na podlagi katerih bi lahko preučilo omejitev celotnega števila koncesij glede na zahteve, ki izhajajo iz prava Skupnosti.
The Court does not limit the temporal effects of its judgment
Sodišče ni omejilo časovnih učinkov te sodbe
The Court draws attention to the fact that the non-contractual liability of the Community depends on the fulfilment of three conditions: the unlawfulness of the conduct alleged against the institutions, the fact of damage and the existence of a causal link between that conduct and the damaged complained of.
Sodišče ponavlja, da je nepogodbena odgovornost Skupnosti odvisna od izpolnitve treh pogojev: nezakonitosti ravnanja, ki se očita institucijam, dejanskega obstoja škode in obstoja vzročne zveze med očitanim ravnanjem in zatrjevano škodo.
The Court emphasises however that the restriction in question is justified, since that system is appropriate and necessary for attaining the objective of the effective management of intellectual property rights.
Vendar je Sodišče poudarilo, da je ta omejitev utemeljena, ker je ta sistem primeren in nujen za dosego cilja učinkovitega upravljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine.
The Court emphasises that the lack of information on the point before the contract is concluded cannot, in principle, be compensated for by the mere fact that consumers will, during the performance of the contract, be informed in good time of a variation of the charges and of their right to terminate the contract if they do not wish to accept the variation.
Sodišče v zvezi s tem opozarja, da neseznanitve s temi informacijami pred sklenitvijo pogodbe načeloma ni mogoče nadoknaditi s tem, da so potrošniki med izvrševanjem pogodbe v ustreznem roku vnaprej obveščeni o spremembi cen in pravici, da pogodbo odpovejo, če te spremembe ne želijo sprejeti.
The Court emphasises this point because the annual report is also addressed to national parliaments and national authorities.
Sodišče to poudarja zato, ker je letno poročilo namenjeno tudi nacionalnim parlamentom in nacionalnim organom.
The Court emphasises, however, that restrictive measures imposed by Member States must satisfy the conditions of proportionality and non-discrimination, whilst actually ensuring attainment of the objectives pursued in a consistent and systematic manner.
Vendar Sodišče poudarja, da morajo omejitve, ki jih določijo države članice, izpolnjevati pogoja sorazmernosti in nediskriminatornosti, pri čemer morajo resnično zagotavljati dosledno in sistematično dosego tega cilja.
The Court emphasises, however, that the fact that a sign is generally capable of constituting a trade mark does not imply that the sign necessarily possesses a distinctive character within the meaning of the directive.
Vendar Sodišče poudarja, da splošna sposobnost znaka, da lahko sestavlja znamko, ne pomeni, da ima ta znak nujno razlikovalni učinek v smislu Direktive.
The Court encourages the Commission to conclude its analysis on the cost of controls, and on the different levels of risk inherent in the spending areas.
Sodišče Komisijo spodbuja, da dokonča svojo analizo stroškov kontrol in različnih ravni tveganja pri delovanju na področjih porabe.
the Court establishes that the EU is not bound by the Chicago Convention because it is not a party to that convention and also has not hitherto assumed all the powers falling within the field of the convention.
Konkretno v zvezi s Čikaško konvencijo Sodišče ugotavlja, da Unija ni vezana s to konvencijo, ker ni njena pogodbenica in ker do danes ni v celoti prevzela vseh pristojnosti, ki izhajajo iz te konvencije.
The Court estimates that almost a third of the errors found on the interim and final payments tested could have been detected and corrected by Member States before certifying expenditure to the Commission, as the audit shows they had the information to do so.
Po oceni Sodišča bi lahko države članice pred potrditvijo odhodkov Komisiji odkrile in popravile skoraj tretjino napak, odkritih pri preizkušenih vmesnih in končnih plačilih, saj je revizija pokazala, da so imele za to potrebne informacije.
The Court estimates that around € 860 million has been spent on auditing EU regional policy by Member States during the period 2007 to 2013.
Po oceni Sodišča so države članice v obdobju 2007–2013 za revidiranje regionalne politike EU porabile približno 860 milijonov EUR.
The Court estimates that at least 11 % of the total amount reimbursed should not have been paid out.
Sodišče ocenjuje, da vsaj 11 % skupnega povrnjenega zneska ne bi smelo biti izplačanih.
The Court estimates that at least 11% of the total of 24.8 bn euro reimbursed during 2008 in respect of the 2000-2006 programming period should not have been reimbursed.
Po oceni Sodišča leta 2008 ne bi smelo biti izplačanih vsaj 11 % od skupno 24,8 milijarde EUR, ki je bila povrnjena za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 .
The Court estimates the Commission error rate at between 2% to 5% in our payments, depending on the policy area, whereas the threshold set by the Court is a 2% error rate.
Sodišče ocenjuje, da znaša Komisijina stopnja napak pri plačilih med 2 % in 5 %, odvisno od področja, pri čemer je kot prag določilo 2-odstotno stopnjo napak.
The Court examined a sample of 23 projects in six countries, which represent a significant part of the aid delivered to that region, to see whether project results had been delivered and were likely to be sustained over time.
Sodišče je preučilo vzorec 23 projektov v šestih državah, ki predstavljajo precejšen delež pomoči tej regiji, da bi ugotovilo, ali so projekti prinesli rezultate in ali je verjetno, da bodo ti rezultati trajni.
The Court examined in this respect whether the Court of First Instance had erred in law by confirming the Commission's statement that Opel Nederland had implemented a bonus system designed to restrict exports, contrary to the EC Treaty.
Sodišče je glede tega preizkusilo, ali je Sodišče prve stopnje zmotno uporabilo pravo, ko je potrdilo navedbo Komisije, da naj bi družba Opel Nederland izvajala sistem premij, katerega namen je omejevanje izvozov, v nasprotju s členom 81 ES.
The Court examined the extent to which the Commission had set a strategy to lead to the most effective use of the aid relating to economic cooperation activities in Asia, and whether the Commission managed the implementation of this aid effectively.
Sodišče je preučilo, v kolikšni meri je Komisija določila strategijo, ki vodi do najuspešnejše porabe pomoči v zvezi z dejavnostmi gospodarskega sodelovanja z Azijo, in ali je Komisija učinkovito upravljala izvajanje te pomoči.
The Court examined two main questions: Is the framework for the reduction of fleet capacity clear; and are specific measures well defined and implemented?
Preučilo je dve glavni vprašanji: ali je okvir za zmanjšanje zmogljivosti flot jasen ter ali so posebni ukrepi dobro opredeljeni in izvajani?
The Court examines the argument of Poland and Lithuania that the legislation of those States is justified by the need to ensure road safety, the latter constituting an imperative requirement relating to the public interest capable of justifying a hindrance to the free movement of goods.
Sodišče je preučilo argument Poljske in Litve, da so predpisi teh držav utemeljeni s potrebo po zagotovitvi varnosti v cestnem prometu, ki je nujni razlog v splošnem interesu, ki bi lahko upravičil oviro za prosti pretok blaga.
The Court examines the Czech Republic’s argument that products whose exact nature is clear from traditional usage and/or whose designation is clearly used to describe a characteristic quality of the product automatically benefit from that derogation without their inclusion in that list, and hence prior authorisation by the Commission, being necessary.
Sodišče je preučilo argument Češke republike, da se za izdelke, katerih prava narava je jasno razvidna iz ustaljene uporabe in/ali kadar se oznake jasno uporabljajo za opis značilne kakovosti izdelka, to odstopanje uporabi samodejno, ne da bi bila za to potrebna vpis tega izdelka na seznam in predhodna odobritev Komisije.
The Court examines, first, the plea relied on by the Commission alleging that the Council lacked competence to authorise the aid which the Member States had undertaken to eliminate by accepting the appropriate measures proposed by the Commission.
Sodišče je najprej preučilo tožbeni razlog Komisije v zvezi z nepristojnostjo Sveta za odobritev pomoči, glede katerih so se države članice zavezale, da jih bodo s sprejetjem ustreznih ukrepov odpravile.
The Court explained that this provision cannot be interpreted as prohibiting the Member States from taking account of an application relating to a child over 15 years of age or as authorising them not to do so.
Sodišče podrobneje določa, da se ta določba ne bi smela razlagati tako, da naj bi državam članicam prepovedala, da upoštevajo prošnjo glede otroka, starejšega od 15 let, ali jim dovolila, da je ne upoštevajo.
The Court explained, first of all, the relationship between the CISA and Community law on freedom of movement for persons.
Sodišče najprej natančno določa odnose med KISS in pravom Skupnosti o prostem gibanju oseb.
The Court explains that rules of a Member State do not constitute a restriction within the meaning of the Treaty solely because other Member States apply less strict, or economically more favourable, rules to providers of similar services established in their territory.
Sodišče v zvezi s tem pojasnjuje, da predpisi države članice ne pomenijo omejitve v smislu Pogodbe zgolj zaradi dejstva, da druge države članice uporabljajo pravila, ki so manj stroga ali ekonomsko zanimivejša za ponudnike podobnih storitev, ki imajo sedež na njihovem ozemlju.
The Court explains that tax penalties and criminal proceedings for tax evasion which are based on falseness of the information concerning VAT that has been provided constitute implementation of a number of provisions of EU law which relate to VAT and to protection of the financial interests of the EU.
Sodišče pojasnjuje, da davčne globe in kazenski pregon zaradi davčne zatajitve, zaradi neresničnosti informacij, predloženih v zvezi z DDV, pomenijo izvajanje več določb prava Unije na področju DDV in varstva finančnih interesov Unije.
The Court explains the field of application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and interprets the principle preventing a person from being punished twice
Sodišče pojasni področje uporabe Listine o temeljnih pravicah in razloži načelo prepovedi dvakratnega kaznovanja
The Court explains, for the first time, the relationship between the convention implementing the Schengen agreement and freedom of movement for persons
Sodišče prvič natančno določa vezi med konvencijo za izvedbo Schengenskega sporazuma in prostim gibanjem oseb
The court fees should be fixed at such a level as to ensure a right balance between the principle of fair access to justice, in particular for SMEs and micro-entities, and an adequate contribution of the parties for the costs incurred by the EEUPC, recognising the economic benefits to the parties involved, and the objective of a self-financing court with balanced finances .
Sodne takse bi bilo treba določiti tako, da se zagotovi primerno ravnotežje med načelom poštenega dostopa do sodišča, predvsem za MSP in mikropodjetja, in ustreznim prispevkom strani k stroškom SEPPEU, ob upoštevanju gospodarske koristi, ki jo imajo zadevne strani, ter cilja, da se sodišče financira iz lastnih sredstev, ki so uravnotežena.
The court fees should be fixed by the Mixed Committee on a proposal by the Commission which should include an assessment by the Commission of the expected costs of the EEUPC.
Znesek sodnih taks bi moral določiti mešani odbor na predlog Komisije, ki bi moral vsebovati tudi njeno oceno pričakovanih stroškov SEPPEU.
The Court finds furthermore, that the Community institutions were not required to hear the persons concerned, given that they had no discretion in the implementation of the sanctions decided by the Security Council.
Sodišče prve stopnje sodi, da institucije Skupnosti niso bile dolžne zaslišati zainteresirane osebe, ker pri izvrševanju sankcij, o katerih je odločil Varnostni svet, niso imele nobenega pooblastila za odločanje po prostem preudarku.
The Court finds in that regard that even if the non-alcoholic drinks concerned do not actually have the same benefits as a drug to treat erectile dysfunction, the consumer will be inclined to buy them thinking that he will find similar qualities, such as an increase in libido, owing to the transfer of positive associations projected by the image of the earlier mark.
Splošno sodišče je v zvezi s tem ugotovilo, da čeprav zadevne brezalkoholne pijače dejansko ne bi mogle prinesti enake koristi kot zdravilo,