natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its judgment delivered today, the Court holds, first, that Sweden had not adopted all the necessary measures to ensure compliance with the initial judgment of 2010 at the end of the two‑month period following receipt of the letter of formal notice sent to it by the Commission (that is, on 28 August 2010).
Sodišče v danes izdani sodbi najprej ugotavlja, da Švedska do izteka dvomesečnega roka (to je do 28. avgusta 2010) od prejema uradnega opomina, ki ji ga je poslala Komisija, ni sprejela vseh potrebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev izvršitve prve sodbe iz leta 2010.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court notes first of all that a national procedural rule cannot call into question the discretion of national courts to submit a request to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling in cases where they have doubts as to the interpretation of EU law.
V svoji sodbi sprejeti danes, Sodišče najprej opozarja, da obstoj nacionalne procesne določbe ne more postaviti pod vprašaj možnosti, ki jo imajo nacionalna sodišča, da Sodišču predložijo predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, kadar imajo dvome glede razlage prava Unije.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court notes, first of all, that the Commission confined itself in its decision to differentiating internet‑based communications for the general public (‘consumer communications’) from communications for businesses (‘enterprise communications’) without adopting a position on whether it was necessary to identify, within the category of consumer communications, the existence of narrower reference markets.
Splošno sodišče je v sodbi, izrečeni na današnji dan, ugotovilo, najprej, da je se je Komisija v odločbi omejila na ločevanje med spletno komunikacijo za širšo javnost („komunikacija širše javnosti“) in komunikacijo za podjetja („poslovna komunikacija“), pri čemer se ni opredelila, ali bi bilo treba v skupini komunikacije širše javnosti ugotoviti obstoj bolj omejenih referenčnih trgov.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court observes, first of all, that the regulation does not expressly define jurisdiction in a case where the domicile of the defendant is unknown.
Sodišče je v sodbi z današnjega dne najprej ugotovilo, da navedena uredba izrecno ne opredeljuje sodne pristojnosti,
In its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice declares that the ‘basic anti-dumping’ regulation does not preclude all types of State interference in producer undertakings, but only significant interference in decisions regarding prices, costs and inputs.
Sodišče je v današnji sodbi ugotovilo, da „osnovna protidampinška“ uredba ne prepoveduje vseh vrst državnega vmešavanja v družbah proizvajalkah, temveč le večje vmešavanje v odločitve teh družb glede cen, stroškov in vložkov.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice declares, firstly, that a regulation adopted by a professional association, such as the OTOC, must be regarded as a decision adopted by an association of undertakings within the meaning of EU competition law Furthermore, the fact that a professional association, such as the OTOC, is required by law to put into place a system of compulsory training for its members cannot remove the rules adopted by that association from the scope of EU competition law, in so far as those rules are attributable to it alone.
Sodišče je v sodbi, izrečeni na današnji dan, odločilo, prvič, da je treba uredbo, ki jo sprejme poklicna zbornica, kot je OTOC, šteti za sklep podjetniškega združenja v smislu konkurenčnega prava Unije.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice finds that, where there are several places at which services are provided in different Member States, it is necessary to identify the place which provides the closest connecting factor between the contract in question and the court having jurisdiction, in particular the place where, pursuant to that contract, the main provision of services is to be carried out.
V današnji sodbi Sodišče ugotavlja, da je treba v primeru opravljanja storitev v več krajih v različnih državah članicah poiskati kraj, ki zagotavlja najtesnejšo navezno okoliščino med obravnavano pogodbo in pristojnim sodiščem, zlasti tistega, v katerem mora biti v skladu s to pogodbo opravljen glavni del storitev.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice notes first of all that legislation on games of chance is one of the areas in which there are significant moral, religious and cultural differences between the Member States.
Sodišče je v današnji sodbi najprej spomnilo, da je ureditev iger na srečo eno od področij, na katerih se pojavljajo znatna moralna, verska in kulturna razhajanja med državami članicami.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice notes, first of all, that under Directive 2004/38 the person concerned must be notified in writing of a decision refusing entry, and in such a way that he is able to comprehend its content and the implications for him.
Sodišče je v današnji sodbi najprej poudarilo, da mora biti v skladu z Direktivo 2004/38 zadevna oseba o odločbi o zavrnitvi vstopa obveščena pisno, in sicer na takšen način, da lahko razume njeno vsebino in učinke, ki jih ima na njo.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice observes, first of all, that the Member States are in principle obliged to act upon a European arrest warrant.
Sodišče v sodbi z današnjega dne opozarja, prvič, da so države članice načeloma zavezane k izvršitvi evropskega naloga za prijetje.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice observes, firstly, that the application of criminal law in the present case presupposes that there has been, on the national territory, a ‘distribution to the public’ for the purposes of EU law.
Sodišče je v današnji sodbi najprej navedlo, da uporaba kazenskega prava v obravnavanem primeru predpostavlja, da je na nacionalnem ozemlju prišlo do „javnega distribuiranja“ v smislu prava Unije.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court of Justice points out first of all that the Charter states that it is addressed to the Member States only when they are implementing EU law.
V tej sodbi Sodišče najprej spominja, da se v skladu z določbami Listine ta uporablja za države članice samo, ko izvajajo pravo Unije.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court points out that although the Member States are in principle obliged to act upon a European arrest warrant, they may allow the competent judicial authorities, in specific situations, to decide that a sentence imposed must be enforced in the territory of the executing Member State.
Sodišče v sodbi s tega dne opozarja, da so države članice načeloma zavezane k izvršitvi evropskega naloga za prijetje, imajo pa možnost, da pristojnim pravosodnim organom v posebnih okoliščinah omogočijo sprejetje odločitve, da je treba naloženo kazen izvršiti na ozemlju izvršitvene države članice.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court points out that if Member States were free to adopt legislation permitting, inter alia, reproductions for private use to be made from an unlawful source, the result of that would clearly be detrimental to the proper functioning of the internal market.
Sodišče v današnji sodbi poudarja, da bi v primeru, da imajo države članice možnost sprejetja predpisov, ki med drugim dovoljujejo, da se reproduciranje za zasebne namene lahko opravi tudi iz nezakonitega vira, zaradi tega vsekakor nastala škoda za dobro delovanje notranjega trga.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court points out that the supervisory authorities established in accordance with Directive 95/46 must be allowed to perform their duties free from external influence.
Sodišče je s svojo današnjo sodbo opozorilo, da biti nadzornim organom, ustanovljenim v skladu z Direktivo, omogočeno, da svoje naloge izvajajo brez zunanjega vpliva.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court points out, first of all, that holders of intellectual-property rights may apply for an injunction against intermediaries, such as internet service providers, whose services are being used by a third party to infringe their rights.
Sodišče je v današnji sodbi najprej spomnilo, da lahko imetniki pravic intelektualne lastnine zahtevajo izdajo sodne odredbe proti posrednikom, kot so ponudniki internetnih storitev, katerih storitve tretje stranke uporabljajo za kršitev njihovih pravic.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court recalls, first, that medical services supplied for consideration fall within the scope of the provisions on the freedom to provide services.
padajo na področje uporabe določb o svobodi opravljanja storitev.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court replies, first, that the directive must be interpreted as precluding a national provision which makes entitlement to paid annual leave conditional on a minimum period of 10 days’ (or one month’s) actual work during the reference period.
Sodišče v današnji sodbi odgovarja, prvič, da je treba Direktivo razlagati tako, da nasprotuje nacionalni določbi, ki pravico do plačanega letnega dopusta pogojuje z najmanj desetimi dnevi dejanskega dela (ali enim mesecem) v referenčnem obdobju.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court states that a passenger may claim compensation from an air carrier for the loss of items belonging to him which were in baggage checked in in the name of another passenger.
Sodišče je v današnji sodbi potrdilo, da lahko potnik pri letalskem prevozniku uveljavlja odškodnino zaradi izgube njegovih predmetov, ki so bili v prtljagi, ki je bila oddana na ime drugega potnika.
In its judgment delivered today, the Court states, first, that a third-country national, who is a family member of a Union citizen who has exercised his right of free movement and residence, may only count the periods which he has spent with that citizen for the purposes of the acquisition of a right of permanent residence.
Sodišče v sodbi, razglašeni na današnji dan, opozarja, prvič, da se lahko v primeru državljana tretje države, ki je družinski član državljana Unije, ki je uveljavljal svojo pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja, za namene pridobitve pravice do stalnega prebivanja upoštevajo le obdobja, ki jih je prestal s tem državljanom.
In its judgment delivered today, the General Court confirms that analysis and dismisses the action brought by Volkswagen against OHIM’s decision.
Splošno sodišče je z današnjo sodbo potrdilo to presojo in zavrnilo tožbo družbe Volkswagen zoper odločbo UUNT.
In its judgment delivered today, the General Court has found, first of all, that the Commission, before adopting the contested decisions, did not submit the amended drafts of those decisions, together with the EFSA’s consolidated opinion of 2009 and the minority opinions, to the competent committees.
Splošno sodišče v današnji sodbi najprej ugotavlja, da Komisija pred sprejetjem spornih sklepov pristojnima odboroma ni predložila spremenjenih osnutkov teh sklepov, skupaj s konsolidiranim mnenjem EFSE iz leta 2009 in manjšinskima mnenjema.
In its judgment given on 8 November 2012, the General Court found that, since the name ‘Vinohradnícka oblasť Tokaj’ was protected by an EU regulation before its entry in the E-Bacchus database, the entry as such was not capable of producing legal effects.
Splošno sodišče je s sodbo z dne 8. novembra 2012 razsodilo, da ker je bilo ime „Vinohradnícka oblasť Tokaj“ pred vpisom v podatkovno zbirko E‑Bacchus že zaščiteno z uredbo Unije, vpis ni imel pravnih učinkov.
In its judgment in Case C-319/02 Manninen [2004] ECR I-7477, the Court decided that the calculation of a tax credit must take account of the tax actually paid by the company in the Member State in which it is established.
I-7477) je Sodišče odločilo, da je treba pri izračunu odbitka davka upoštevati davek, ki ga je dejansko plačala družba v državi članici, kjer ima sedež.
In its judgment in Case C-35/98 Verkooijen [2000] ECR I-4071, the Court held that Community law precludes a legislative provision of a Member State which makes the grant of an exemption from income tax payable on dividends paid to natural persons who are shareholders subject to the condition that those dividends are paid by a company whose seat is in that Member State.
I-4071, je Sodišče razsodilo, da pravo Skupnosti nasprotuje zakonski določbi države članice, ki odpustitev davka na dohodek, kateremu so podvržene dividende, izplačane delničarjem, ki so fizične osebe, pogojuje s tem, da te dividende izplačajo družbe s sedežem v tej državi članici.
In its judgment in Sturgeon and Others, the Court of Justice held moreover that passengers whose flights are delayed may also be compensated, even though the regulation expressly grants a right to compensation only when flights are cancelled, provided that they reach their final destination three hours or more after the scheduled arrival time.
Sodišče je v sodbi v zadevi Sturgeon med drugim že presodilo, da imajo pravico do odškodnine tudi potniki, katerih let je imel zamudo, čeprav jim uredba to pravico izrecno priznava le v primeru odpovedi leta, če v končni namembni kraj prispejo tri ure ali več pozneje, kot je bilo predvideno.
In its judgment in the Altmark case, the European Court of Justice held that compensation of SGEIs constitutes State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty, and is thus subject to control by the Commission, unless four cumulative conditions are met:
Sodišče Evropske unije je v sodbi v zadevi Altmark odločilo, da so nadomestila za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena državne pomoči v smislu člena 107(1) Pogodbe in zato predmet nadzora Komisije, razen če so izpolnjeni štirje kumulativni pogoji:
In its judgment of 17 September 2007, the General Court essentially upheld the 2004 decision.
Splošno sodišče je v sodbi z dne 17. septembra 2007 v glavnem potrdilo odločbo iz leta 2004.
In its judgment of 21 October 2003, the Court of First Instance essentially confirmed the Commission's decision.
Sodišče prve stopnje je v sodbi z dne 21. oktobra 2003 v bistvenem potrdilo odločbo Komisije.
In its judgment of 25 April 2013, the General Court, without examining the admissibility of that action, stated that both the implementing regulation and the basic regulation were valid (see Press Release No.
Splošno sodišče je v sodbi z dne 25. aprila 2013, ne da bi preučilo dopustnost tožbe, poudarilo, da sta tako izvedbena kot temeljna uredba veljavni.
In its judgment of today, the Court essentially upholds the Commission’s decision and rejects all the arguments put forward by Microsoft in support of annulment.
Splošno sodišče s sodbo z dne 17. septembra 2007 v glavnem potrjuje odločbo Komisije in zavrača vse trditve, ki jih družba Microsoft navaja, da bi dosegla razglasitev ničnosti te odločbe.
In its judgment of today, the Court holds that the German tax legislation restricts the free movement of capital.
V današnji sodbi je Sodišče razsodilo, da nemška zakonodaja omejuje prosti pretok kapitala.
In its judgment of today, the Court of Justice starts by finding that ‘pomazánkové máslo’ does not satisfy the criteria laid down in the regulation for it to be marketed under the designation ‘butter’.
Sodišče je v današnji sodbi najprej ugotovilo, da „pomazánkové máslo“ nima ustreznih značilnosti, določenih z navedeno uredbo, da bi se lahko dajalo v promet pod oznako „maslo“.
In its judgment of today, the Court of Justice stresses that, in order to observe the interests of passengers and the general objectives pursued by EU law, the information supplied to passengers must be of use to them.
Sodišče v sodbi, izrečeni danes, poudarja, da morajo biti zaradi spoštovanja interesov potnikov in splošnih ciljev prava Unije informacije, ki se zagotovijo potnikom, zanje koristne.
In its judgment the Court of Justice explains first that, by relying in particular on the content and on the legal context of the entry at issue, the new wine regime, for reasons of legal certainty, made provision for a transitional regime in order to maintain the protection of wine names already protected before 1 August 2009 under national law, and therefore under EU law.
Sodišče se je v sodbi najprej oprlo zlasti na vsebino in pravni kontekst spornega vpisa ter razložilo, da je bila zaradi pravne varnosti z novo ureditvijo za vino predvidena prehodna ureditev, da bi se ohranila zaščita, ki so jo v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo in s tem tudi s pravom Unije zaščitena imena vin uživala pred 1. avgustom 2009.
In its judgment the Court of Justice notes, first of all, that as Community law now stands, a benefit which is intended to compensate civilian victims of war or repression for physical or mental harm which they have suffered falls within the competence of the Member States.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti najprej opozarja, da na trenutni stopnji razvoja prava Skupnosti dajatev, katere namen je povrnitev škode civilnim žrtvam vojne ali represije zaradi psihične ali telesne okvare, ki so jo te utrpele, spada v pristojnost držav članic.
In its judgment the Court of Justice observes that where an agreement has as its object the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition, there is no longer any need to take account of the concrete effects of the agreement in order to establish its unlawful nature.
Sodišče je v sodbi opozorilo, da kadar je cilj sporazuma omejiti, preprečiti ali izkriviti konkurenco, upoštevanje njegovih konkretnih učinkov na konkurenco za določitev njegove nezakonitosti ni več potrebno.
In its judgment today, the Court answers in the affirmative.
Sodišče je v svoji sodbi, izdani danes, odgovorilo pritrdilno.
In its judgment today, the Court considers first that the free movement of capital applies in a situation where, under national tax legislation, the dividends paid by companies established in a Member State to an investment fund established in a non-Member State do not qualify for a tax exemption, while investment funds established in that Member State receive such an exemption.
Sodišče je v sodbi z današnjega dne najprej menilo, da se ureditev prostega pretoka kapitala uporabi v položaju, v katerem na podlagi nacionalne davčne zakonodaje dividende, ki jih družbe s sedežem v državi članici izplačajo investicijskemu skladu s sedežem v tretji državi, niso predmet davčne oprostitve, medtem ko so investicijski skladi s sedežem v navedeni državi članici upravičeni do te oprostitve.
In its judgment today, the Court finds, first, that Article 28 of the regulation does not confer any autonomous power on ESMA that goes beyond the powers granted to that authority when it was created.
Sodišče v sodbi, izrečeni na današnji dan, ugotavlja, prvič, da člen 28 Uredbe ESMI ne podeljuje nobenega samostojnega pooblastila, ki bi prekoračevalo pooblastila, ki so bila temu organu dodeljena ob ustanovitvi.
In its judgment today, the Court finds, first, that the regulation itself does not exempt railway undertakings from the obligation to pay compensation where the delay is attributable to force majeure.
V svoji današnji sodbi je Sodišče ugotovilo, najprej, da Uredba prevoznikov v železniškem prometu v primeru, da je zamuda nastala zaradi višje sile, ne razbremenjuje obveznosti plačila nadomestila cene vozovnice.
In its judgment today, the Court holds that the concept of ‘denied boarding’ relates not only to cases of overbooking but also to those concerning other grounds, such as operational reasons.
Sodišče v današnji sodbi meni, da se pojem „zavrnitev vkrcanja“ nanaša ne le na zavrnitev vkrcanja zaradi prevelikega števila rezervacij, temveč tudi na zavrnitve vkrcanja iz drugih razlogov, na primer zaradi operativnih težav.
In its judgment today, the Court holds that the concept of ‘denied boarding’ relates not only to cases of overbooking but also to those concerning other grounds, such as operational reasons.
Sodišče v sodbi s tega dne meni, da se pojem „zavrnitev vkrcanja“ nanaša na primere prevelikega števila rezervacij, vendar prav tako na položaje, povezane z drugimi razlogi, zlasti operativnimi razlogi.
In its judgment today, the Court notes, first of all, that the purpose of the regulation is to grant minimum rights to air passengers when faced with three different types of situation, namely, when they are denied boarding against their will, when their flights are cancelled and, lastly, when their flights are delayed.
Sodišče v današnji sodbi najprej spominja, da je cilj navedene uredbe odobritev minimalnih pravic potnikom v zračnem prometu, kadar se znajdejo v treh različnih položajih, in sicer v primeru zavrnitve vkrcanja proti njihovi volji, odpovedi njihovega leta in nazadnje zamudi njihovega leta.
In its judgment today, the Court notes, firstly, that national legislation which grants a monopoly to OPAP and prohibits providers established in another Member State from offering the same games of chance on Greek territory constitutes a restriction on the freedom to provide services or on the freedom of establishment.
Sodišče v današnji sodbi najprej navaja, da nacionalna ureditev, ki družbi OPAP daje monopol in konkurentom s sedežem v drugi državi članici prepoveduje ponujanje istih iger na grškem ozemlju, pomeni omejitev svobode opravljanja storitev ali svobode ustanavljanja.
In its judgment today, the Court of Justice considers, first of all, that it is common ground that a person’s sexual orientation is a characteristic so fundamental to his identity that he should not be forced to renounce it.
Sodišče je v sodbi s tega dne najprej ugotovilo, da ni sporno, da je spolna usmeritev osebe tako temeljnega pomena za njeno identiteto, da se oseba ne sme prisiliti, naj se ji odreče.
In its judgment today, the Court replies that EU law (more specifically the prohibition on all discrimination on grounds of nationality and the free movement guaranteed to citizens of the EU) precludes national rules which, in civil cases brought before the courts of a specific territorial entity in the Member State in question, grant the right to use an unofficial language only to Italian nationals who are domiciled in that territorial entity.
Sodišče s sodbo z današnjega dne odgovarja, da pravo Unije (natančneje prepoved vsakršne diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva in prosto gibanje, zagotovljeno državljanom Unije) nasprotuje nacionalni ureditvi, ki pravico do uporabe jezika, ki ni uradni jezik, v civilnih postopkih, ki potekajo pred sodišči v določeni ozemeljski enoti zadevne države članice, priznavajo le njenim državljanom, ki prebivajo v tej ozemeljski enoti.
In its judgment today, the Court states that the Brussels Regulation does not indicate whether a jurisdiction clause may be transmitted, beyond the circle of parties to the initial contract, to a third party, a party to a subsequent contract and successor to the rights and obligations of one of the parties.
Sodišče v sodbi, izrečeni na današnji dan, ugotavlja, da navedena uredba ne pojasnjuje, ali je mogoče dogovor o pristojnosti prenesti iz kroga prvotnih pogodbenih strank na tretjo osebo, ki je pogodbena stranka pozneje sklenjene pogodbe, in naslednica pravic in obveznosti ene od stranke v prvotni pogodbi.
In its judgment today, the Court states that the point at which the temporary incapacity arose is irrelevant.
Sodišče je v svoji sodbi, ki je bila izdana danes, pojasnilo, da ni pomembno, kdaj je nastopila začasna nezmožnost za delo.
In its judgment today, the Court, first, dismisses the Commission’s claim that Poland has failed to take appropriate measures to ensure, in good time, that the accounts of the infrastructure manager, PLK SA (PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe Spółka Akcyjna), balance.
Sodišče je z današnjo sodbo najprej zavrnilo očitek Komisije, da Poljska ni sprejela ukrepov, ki bi v primernem roku zagotovili finančno ravnotežje upravljavca infrastrukture, to je družbe PLK SA (PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe Spółka Akcyjna).
In its judgment today, the General Court dismisses the action and confirms the decision of OHIM.
Splošno sodišče je s sodbo, izdano danes, tožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo odločbo UUNT.