natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court points out in this regard that diacritical marks are frequently omitted in many daily actions for technical reasons (for example, because of the objective constraints inherent in some computer systems).
V zvezi s tem Sodišče navaja, da se diakritični znaki v številnih dejanjih vsakdanjega življenja pogosto opuščajo iz tehničnih razlogov (ki so zlasti v zvezi z objektivnimi omejitvami nekaterih informacijskih sistemov).
The Court points out in this respect that Member States may even extend that right by allowing asylum seekers to remain in their territory until a final decision has been given on their application.
Sodišče v zvezi s tem pojasnjuje, da lahko države članice to pravico še razširijo, tako da prosilcem za azil dovolijo, da na njihovem ozemlju ostanejo do sprejetja dokončne odločbe o njihovi prošnji.
The Court points out in this respect that Mr Iida has always lived in Germany in accordance with national law, without the absence of a right of residence under EU law having discouraged his daughter or his spouse from exercising their right of freedom of movement by moving to Austria.
Sodišče v tem pogledu poudarja, da je Y. Iida v Nemčiji vedno prebival v skladu z nacionalnim pravom, ne da bi neobstoj pravice prebivanja na podlagi prava Unije odvrnil njegovo hčer in njegovo ženo, da bi uresničevali pravico do prostega gibanja s preselitvijo v Avstrijo.
The Court points out next that the effectiveness of the right to freedom of movement for workers may require that a derived right of residence be granted under Article 45 TFEU to a third-country national who is a family member of the worker – an EU citizen – in the Member State of which the latter is a national.
Sodišče nato pojasnjuje, da lahko polni učinek pravice do prostega gibanja delavcev zahteva, da se izvedena pravica do prebivanja na podlagi člena 45 PDEU dodeli državljanu tretje države, ki je družinski član delavca, ki je državljan Unije, v državi članici, katere državljanstvo ima zadnjenavedeni.
The Court points out that a new vehicle, on which registration duty has been paid in Hungary loses, with time, part of its market value and that the amount of registration duty included in the residual value of the vehicle diminishes proportionally.
Sodišče ugotavlja, da novo vozilo, za katerega je bil davek na registracijo plačan na Madžarskem, sčasoma izgubi del tržne vrednosti in da se znesek davka na registracijo, ki je vštet v preostalo vrednost vozila, sorazmerno zmanjša.
The Court points out that although the regulation neither replaces nor harmonises existing domestic mechanisms for the recovery of uncontested claims, it is intended to establish a uniform instrument for the recovery of such claims.
Sodišče je opozorilo, da je namen uredbe, čeprav ne nadomešča in ne usklajuje nacionalnih mehanizmov za izterjavo nespornih zahtevkov, vzpostaviti enoten instrument za izterjavo takih zahtevkov.
The Court points out that Directive 91/440 instigated the liberalisation of rail transport so as to ensure equitable and non-discriminatory access for railway undertakings to the rail network infrastructure.
Sodišče je v zvezi s tem opozorilo, da se je z Direktivo 91/440 začela liberalizacija železniškega prometa, da bi se omogočil pravičen in nediskriminatoren dostop prevoznikov v železniškem prometu do infrastrukture železniškega omrežja.
The Court points out that Fidium Finanz is established in a non-member State.
Sodišče opozarja, da ima Fidium Finanz sedež v tretji državi.
The Court points out that in the event of disruption to the service or danger, the adoption of measures necessary for restoring normal operating conditions, including the withdrawal of train paths, falls within traffic management.
Sodišče pa je opozorilo, da v primeru motenj v prometu ali nevarnosti sprejetje ukrepov, ki so potrebni za obnovitev normalnih razmer v prometu, vključno z odvzemom vlakovnih poti, spada k vodenju prometa.
The Court points out that it follows from Article 254 EC that a Community regulation cannot take effect in law unless it has been published in the Official Journal.
Sodišče opozarja, da iz člena 254 ES izhaja, da uredba Skupnosti ne more imeti pravnih učinkov, če ni bila objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (42).
The Court points out that it is a matter for it, when reviewing the legality of the contested decision, to determine, firstly, whether the Commission exercised its discretion by following the ‘guidelines’ setting out the framework for the exercise of that discretion when setting the amounts of fines and, secondly, where there is a departure from those rules, to determine whether it is justified and properly reasoned.
Sodišče prve stopnje opozarja, da mora v okviru nadzora zakonitosti izpodbijane odločbe preveriti, prvič, ali je Komisija pooblastilo za odločanje po prostem preudarku izvrševala na podlagi „smernic“, ki določajo okvir izvrševanja tega pooblastila pri določitvi zneska glob in drugič, v primeru odstopanja od teh pravil, preveriti ali je to odstopanje v pravno zadostni meri utemeljeno in obrazloženo.
The Court points out that it is possible not to carry out an examination of the content of the documents requested only if it is clear that the exception invoked applies to all the information contained in those documents.
Sodišče opozarja, da je možnost, da se ne opravi preizkusa vsebine zaprošenih dokumentov, dovoljena le, ko je očitno, da se navedena izjema v celoti uporablja za njihovo vsebino.
The Court points out that resident taxpayers paying contributions to the Polish health insurance scheme and those coming under a compulsory health insurance scheme of another Member State are in objectively comparable situations as regards taxation principles since, in Poland, both are subject to an unlimited liability to tax.
Sodišče navaja, da so zavezanci rezidenti, ki vplačujejo prispevke v sistem poljskega zdravstvenega zavarovanja, in tisti, ki so vključeni v sistem obveznega zdravstvenega zavarovanja druge države članice, v primerljivem položaju glede načel obdavčitve, če so na Poljskem oboji obdavčeni glede vseh dohodkov.
The Court points out that the Commission is required to carry out a concrete examination of the content of each document to which access is requested.
Sodišče prve stopnje opozarja, da mora Komisija konkretno preučiti vsebino vsakega dokumenta, za katerega je zaprošen dostop.
The Court points out that the cumulative effect of making the works available to potential recipients should be taken into account and that, in that connection, it is in particular relevant to ascertain the number of persons who have access to the same work at the same time and successively.
Sodišče je pojasnilo, da je treba upoštevati kumulativni učinek dajanja del na voljo potencialnim naslovnikom in da je glede tega zlasti pomembno vprašanje, koliko oseb ima dostop do istega dela sočasno in zaporedno.
The Court points out that the data subject may address such a request directly to the operator of the search engine (the controller) which must then duly examine its merits.
Sodišče je pojasnilo, da lahko zadevna oseba take zahteve naslovi neposredno na upravljavca iskalnika, ki mora nato ustrezno presoditi, ali so utemeljene.
The Court points out that the Directive aims, inter alia, to promote the exercise of the right of European citizens to move and reside freely, subject to the restrictions laid down by EU law.
Sodišče opozarja, da je namen direktive zlasti dati prednost uresničevanju pravice do prostega gibanja in prebivanja evropskih državljanov ob upoštevanju omejitev, predvidenih s pravom Unije.
The Court points out that the EC Treaty prohibits any restriction on movements of capital between Member States.
Sodišče poudarja, da so na podlagi Pogodbe ES prepovedane vse omejitve kapitala med državami članicami.
The Court points out that the free movement of capital may be limited by national measures that are justified by legitimate interests.
Sodišče navaja, da se prosti pretok kapitala lahko omeji z nacionalnimi ukrepi, ki so upravičeni iz legitimnih razlogov.
The Court points out that the Member States are competent to determine the requirements of public policy and public security in accordance with their national needs.
Sodišče poudarja, da so države članice pristojne, da v skladu s svojimi nacionalnimi potrebami določijo zahteve javnega reda in javne varnosti.
The Court points out that the Member States may, in accordance with EU law, apply the directive’s provisions to areas not covered by its scope.
Sodišče poudarja, da lahko države članice v skladu s pravom Unije uporabijo določbe te direktive za področja, ki jih ta ne ureja.
The Court points out that the right of access to the courts is not absolute.
Sodišče prve stopnje navaja, da pravica dostopa do sodišč ni neomejena.
The Court points out that the situation of a worker on short-time working in the context of a social plan is fundamentally different from that of a worker who is unable to work as a result of an illness, the latter being entitled, in accordance with the Court’s case-law, to paid annual leave in the same way as a worker in active employment.
Sodišče ugotavlja, da je položaj delavca, katerega delovni čas je bil skrajšan v okviru socialnega načrta, povsem drugačen od položaja delavca na bolniškem dopustu, saj ima ta v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča pravico do plačanega letnega dopusta na enak način kot aktivni delavec.
The Court points out that the three‑month limit laid down in the local border traffic regulation relates only to ‘uninterrupted stays’, whereas the limitation resulting from the Schengen acquis does not relate to such stays.
Sodišče poudarja, da se omejitev treh mesecev, določena v Uredbi o obmejnem prometu, nanaša na „neprekinjeno bivanje“, medtem ko se omejitev iz schengenskega pravnega reda nikakor ne nanaša na tako bivanje.
The Court points out that, under Directive 91/440, decision making related to path allocation including the definition and assessment of availability is regarded as coming within the essential functions.
Sodišče je opozorilo, da v skladu z Direktivo 91/440 odločanje o dodeljevanju vlakovnih poti, skupaj z opredelitvijo in oceno razpoložljivosti, spada med bistvene funkcije.
The Court points out, first of all, that any person can claim compensation for the harm suffered where there is a causal link between that harm and a prohibited agreement or practice and that the EU may thus also avail itself of that right.
Sodišče je najprej poudarilo, da lahko vsakdo zahteva odškodnino za škodo, ki jo je utrpel, če obstaja vzročna zveza med to škodo in omejevalnim sporazumom ali prepovedanim ravnanjem, in da ima to pravico torej tudi Unija.
The Court points out, first of all, that Directive 96/71 does not allow the host Member State to make the provision of services in its territory conditional on the observance of terms and conditions of employment which go beyond the mandatory rules for minimum protection.
Sodišče najprej ugotovi, da Direktiva 96/71 ne omogoča državi članici gostiteljici, da izvedbo storitev na svojem ozemlju pogojuje z upoštevanjem pogojev za delo in zaposlitev, ki presegajo prisilne predpise glede minimalne zaščite.
The Court points out, first of all, that the directive imposes on Member States a general obligation to make the wholesale distribution of medicinal products subject to possession of a special authorisation, an obligation which also applies to persons authorised or entitled to supply medicinal products to the public if they may also engage in wholesale business.
Sodišče najprej pojasnjuje, da ta direktiva za države članice določa splošno obveznost, da za promet z zdravili na debelo zahtevajo posebno dovoljenje, ki ga morajo imeti tudi osebe, ki so pooblaščene za izdajo zdravil ali so jih upravičene izdajati javnosti, če lahko opravljajo tudi dejavnost trgovca na debelo.
The Court points out, however, that if the licence acquired by the first acquirer relates to a greater number of users than he needs, that acquirer is not authorised by the effect of the exhaustion of the distribution right to divide the licence and resell only part of it.
Vendar Sodišče poudarja, da če se licenca, ki jo je pridobil prvi pridobitelj, nanaša na tako število uporabnikov, ki presega njegove potrebe, ta pridobitelj kljub temu ni upravičen, da na podlagi učinka izčrpanja pravice distribuiranja to licenco razdeli in jo prodaja nadalje po delih.
The Court points out, however, that legitimate social policy objectives, such as those related to employment policy, the labour market or vocational training, may justify a derogation from the principle prohibiting discrimination on grounds of age.
Sodišče je kljub temu opozorilo, da legitimni cilji socialne politike, kot so politika zaposlovanja, politika trga delovne sile in poklicnega usposabljanja, lahko utemeljijo odstopanje od načela prepovedi diskriminacije zaradi starosti.
The Court points out, however, that the communication must be directed at a new public, that is to say, at a public that was not taken into account by the copyright holders at the time the initial communication was authorised.
Vendar Sodišče opozarja, da mora biti priobčitev naslovljena na novo javnost, torej na javnost, ki je imetniki avtorske pravice niso upoštevali, ko so dovolili prvotno priobčitev.
The Court points out, however, that the Council does not have power to authorise a new aid scheme which is indissolubly linked to an existing aid scheme that a Member State has undertaken to modify or abolish by accepting appropriate measures.
Vendar je Sodišče pojasnilo, da Svet ni pristojen za odobritev novega sistema pomoči, ki je tako neločljivo povezan z obstoječim sistemom pomoči, glede katerega se je država članica zavezala, da ga bo spremenila ali odpravila.
The Court points out, however, that, in place of an action for liability in respect of all of the damage, the victim may always bring an action before the courts of each Member State in the territory of which the online content is or has been accessible.
Sodišče je vseeno poudarilo, da namesto tožbe zaradi ugotovitve odgovornosti glede celotne škode žrtev lahko vedno vloži tožbo pri sodiščih vsake države članice, na ozemlju katere je ali je bila na spletu objavljena vsebina dostopna.
The Court points out, however, that, in the context of its policy of combating the use of flags of convenience, ITF is required, when asked by one of its members, to initiate solidarity action against the beneficial owner of a vessel which is registered in a State other than that of which that owner is a national, irrespective of whether or not that owner’s exercise of its right of freedom of establishment is liable to have a harmful effect on the work or conditions of employment of its employees.
Sodišče tudi ugotavlja, da mora ITF v okviru politike boja proti zastavam ugodnosti, če jo njen član to zaprosi, sprožiti solidarnostno akcijo proti dejanskemu lastniku ladje, ki je registrirana v državi, ki ni država državljanstva navedenega lastnika, ne glede na to, ali bi imelo izvrševanje njegove pravice do ustanavljanja škodljive posledica za zaposlitev ali delovne pogoje zaposlenih.
The Court points out, in that regard, that EU law provides for a system of judicial review of Commission competition decisions which affords all the safeguards required by the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Sodišče je glede tega poudarilo, da pravo Unije določa sistem sodnega nadzora odločb Komisije na področju konkurence, ki daje vsa jamstva, zahtevana z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
The Court presents the results of its assessment of the implementation of the EU budget in its annual report in order to assist the European Parliament in the discharge procedure.
Sodišče v svojem letnem poročilu predstavi rezultate svoje ocene izvrševanja proračuna EU, kar Evropskemu parlamentu pomaga v postopku razrešnice.
The Court proceeds to examine the various requirements imposed by Italian legislation.
Sodišče nadalje preučuje različne pogoje, ki jih določa italijanska zakonodaja.
The Court produces its Annual Reports in November each year covering the previous financial year: one annual report covers the general budget of the Union, the other covers the European Development Funds (development aid financed outside the general budget).
Sodišče vsako leto novembra izda letni poročili, ki pokrivata prejšnje proračunsko leto: eno letno poročilo se nanaša na splošni proračun Unije, drugo pa na Evropske razvojne sklade (razvojno pomoč, ki se financira zunaj splošnega proračuna).
The Court produces its Annual Reports in October each year covering the previous financial year: one annual report covers the general budget of the Union, the other covers the European Development Funds (development aid financed outside the general budget).
Sodišče vsako leto oktobra izda svoji letni poročili o poslovanju v preteklem proračunskem letu: eno letno poročilo pokriva splošni proračun Unije, drugo pa evropske razvojne sklade (razvojna pomoč, ki se ne financira iz splošnega proračuna).
The Court recalled in that regard that it is settled case-law that the conditions required of comparative advertising must be interpreted in the sense most favourable to it.
da je treba pogoje, ki se zahtevajo za primerjalno oglaševanje,
The Court recalls that companies or persons cannot improperly or fraudulently take advantage of provisions of Community law.
Sodišče opozarja, da se družbe ali fizične osebe ne smejo nepošteno ali v smislu zlorabe sklicevati na norme Skupnosti.
The Court recalls that it has already answered that question affirmatively with regard to criminal proceedings brought before the courts of the Province of Bolzano.
Sodišče opozarja, da je na to vprašanje že pritrdilno odgovorilo v zvezi s kazenskimi postopki pred sodišči v regiji Bolzano.
The Court recalls that it is for the national court hearing the case to examine whether the parties have in fact agreed to the jurisdiction clause, because the verification as to whether the parties concerned have really consented is one of the objectives pursued by the regulation.
Sodišče pojasnjuje, da ima nacionalno sodišče dolžnost, da preuči, ali sta stranki dejansko soglašali o dogovoru o pristojnosti sodišča, ker je preverjanje resničnosti soglasja zadevnih oseb eden od ciljev te uredbe.
The Court recalls that the Commission, when calculating the amount of the fine, classified ADM as a leader of the cartel.
Sodišče opozarja, da je Komisija pri izračunu zneska globe opredelila podjetje ADM kot vodjo omejevalnega sporazuma.
The Court recalls the central role which the Treaty reserves for the Commission in determining whether aid is incompatible with the internal market.
Opozorilo je na osrednjo vlogo, ki jo Pogodba zaupa Komisiji za ugotavljanje morebitne nezdružljivosti pomoči z notranjim trgom.
The Court recalls the importance of the principle of res judicata.
Sodišče opozarja na pomen načela pravnomočnosti.
The Court recalls,
Farida in g.
The Court recalls, at the outset, that it was to comply with a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights that the United Kingdom adopted the legislation challenged by the Kingdom of Spain.
Sodišče je uvodoma opozorilo, da je Združeno kraljestvo zakonodajo, ki jo izpodbija Kraljevina Španija, sprejelo zaradi uskladitve s sodbo Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
The Court recalls, first of all, that the prohibition on determining the unfairness of terms relating to the main subject-matter of the contract must be interpreted strictly and may be applied only to terms laying down the essential obligations of the contract.
Na prvem mestu, Sodišče poudarja, da je treba prepoved presoje nepoštenosti pogojev, ki se nanašajo na glavni predmet pogodbe, razlagati ozko in jo uporabiti le za pogoje, ki določajo bistvene storitve pogodbe.
The Court recognises that measures which amount to quantitative restrictions on imports can be justified on grounds of protection of the health and life of humans.
dopustni, če so nujni za varstvo zdravja in življenja ljudi.
The Court recognises that, in the context of an agreement seeking to regulate paid work collectively, the provisions on freedom of establishment confer rights on a private undertaking which can be relied on against a trade union or an association of trade unions exercising their autonomous power, pursuant to trade union rights, to negotiate with employers or professional organisations the conditions of employment and pay of workers.
Sodišča priznava, da v okviru konvencije o kolektivni ureditvi dela zaposlenih, določbe o svobodi ustanavljanja podeljujejo pravice zasebnemu podjetju, ki jih je mogoče uveljavljati proti sindikatu ali združenju sindikatov, ki izvršujejo svoja avtonomna pooblastila na podlagi sindikalne svobode, da se z delodajalci ali s poklicnimi organizacijami pogajajo glede delovnih pogojev in plačila delavcev.
The Court recognises the need to continue improving and making the best use of its resources.to the background of the changing Community environment.
Sodišče priznava, da si mora glede na spreminjajoče se okolje Skupnosti še naprej prizadevati za boljše delo in čim bolje izkoristiti svoja sredstva.
The Court recognises the potential effect of national declarations and national audit work on raising awareness within Member States of the importance of internal control of EU funds.
Sodišče priznava potencialni učinek nacionalnih izjav in nacionalnega revizijskega dela pri ozaveščanju v državah članicah o pomembnosti notranje kontrole EU.
The Court recognises, in that respect, that parties have the right to defend their interests free from all external influences and that the guarantee of an exchange of information and opinion free from all external influences may require, in the interests of the proper course of justice, that public access to pleadings of the institutions be refused so long as their content has not been debated before the court.
Sodišče prve stopnje glede tega priznava, da imajo stranke pravico braniti svoje interese neodvisno od vseh zunanjih vplivov in da se lahko zaradi zagotovitve izmenjave informacij in mnenj, prostih vsakršnega zunanjega vpliva, v interesu nemotenega poteka postopka zahteva, da se odreče dostop javnosti do vlog institucij, dokler se tam vsebovane trditve ne obravnavajo pred sodiščem.
The Court recommends a better targeted and results oriented policy whereby support to farmers’ income should be directed to the active farmer who conducts concrete and regular agricultural activities and should exclude public entities.
Sodišče priporoča boljšo usmerjenost politike z jasnimi želenimi rezultati, pri čemer bi morala biti dohodkovna podpora kmetom usmerjena v aktivne kmete, ki dejansko izvajajo redne kmetijske dejavnosti, javni subjekti pa je ne bi smeli prejemati.
The Court recommends a number of possible improvements in the design and implementation of successor programmes to IEE (and other comparable programmes).
Sodišče priporoča številne možne izboljšave v zasnovi in izvajanju programov, ki bodo nasledili IEE (in drugih primerljivih programov):
The Court recommends reducing the risk of error by improving the quality of information in the databases used for establishing entitlements and calculating payments and by clarifying and enforcing rules on land usage and maintenance.
Sodišče priporoča, naj se tveganje napak zmanjša z izboljšanjem kakovosti informacij v podatkovnih zbirkah, ki se uporabljajo za določanje pravic in izračunavanje plačil, ter z jasnejšo opredelitvijo in izvajanjem pravil o rabi in ohranjanju zemljišč.
The Court recommends that (a) Member States should focus on waste management infrastructures treating waste previously segregated at source; (b) Member States should set up reliable and complete waste management databases and the Commission should test the reliability of the statistics received from the Member States.
Sodišče priporoča: (a) naj se države članice osredotočijo na objekte za gospodarjenje z odpadki, ki se ločujejo že pri viru; (b) naj države članice vzpostavijo zanesljive in celovite zbirke podatkov o gospodarjenju z odpadki, Komisija pa naj preverja zanesljivost statističnih podatkov, ki jih prejme od držav članic.