natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The audit covered a sample of 26 projects co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund or the Cohesion Fund during the 2000-2006 and 2007-2013 programming periods.
Revizija je zajela vzorec 26 projektov, ki so bili v programskih obdobjih 2000–2006 in 2007–2013 sofinancirani iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj ali Kohezijskega sklada.
The audit covered both the Commission and selected Member States (Spain (Galicia), Italy (Tuscany), Hungary, Austria and Slovenia) accounting for more than 50 % of the total expenditure declared.
Revizija je zajela Komisijo in izbrane države članice (Španija (Galicija), Italija (Toskana), Madžarska, Avstrija in Slovenija), v katerih je bilo prijavljenih več kot 50 % vseh odhodkov.
The audit covered EU support for the electoral process, security sector reform (justice and police), PFM reform and decentralisation over the period 2003 to 2011.
Revizija je zajemala podporo EU volilnemu procesu, reformi varnostnega sektorja (pravosodja in policije), reformi upravljanja javnih financ in decentralizaciji v obdobju 2003–2011.
The audit covered motorways (10 projects), express roads (10 projects) and ordinary two-lane trunk roads (4 projects).
V revizijo so bile vključene avtoceste (10 projektov), hitre ceste (10 projektov) in običajne dvopasovne magistralne ceste (4 projekti).
The audit covered six national and regional rural development programmes, selected mainly for their size: Spain (Castilla y León), France, Italy (Lazio), Lithuania, Poland and Romania.
Revizija je zajela šest nacionalnih in regionalnih programov razvoja podeželja, ki so bili izbrani zlasti zaradi velikosti: Španija (Kastilja in Leon), Francija, Italija (Lacij), Litva, Poljska in Romunija.
The audit covered the areas of State aid control for which Commission’s DG Competition is responsible, i.e. all economic sectors except agriculture and fisheries.
Revizija je zajela področja nadzora državne pomoči, za katera je odgovoren GD za konkurenco, to so vsi gospodarski sektorji razen kmetijstva in ribištva.
The audit covered the Commission responsibilities and six Member States (the Czech Republic, France − Aquitaine, Italy − Campania, Poland, Sweden (Västra Gotland) and the United Kingdom − England (Yorkshire and Humber).
Revizija je zajemala odgovornosti Komisije in šest držav članic (Češka, Francija – Akvitanija, Italija – Kampanja, Poljska, Švedska (Västra Götaland) in Združeno kraljestvo – Anglija (Jorkšir in Humber).
The audit criteria used for assessing the Commission’s performance are based on a set of good verification practices drawn up by the ECA taking into account the EU rules and relevant internal control principles.
Revizijska merila, uporabljena za ocenjevanje dela Komisije, temeljijo na sklopu dobrih praks preverjanja, ki jih je pripravilo Sodišče ter pri tem upoštevalo pravila EU in ustrezna načela notranje kontrole.
The audit did not seek to assess whether the programme is contributing to the political objective of reunification.
Cilj revizije ni bil oceniti, ali program prispeva k doseganju političnega cilja ponovne združitve.
The audit evaluated policies and procedures for the management of conflict of interest situations for four selected Agencies making vital decisions affecting the safety and health of consumers, namely the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).
Sodišče je ocenilo politike in postopke za obvladovanje situacij, v katerih obstaja navzkrižje interesov, v štirih izbranih agencijah EU, ki sprejemajo ključne odločitve, ki vplivajo na varnost in zdravje potrošnikov, in sicer v Evropski agenciji za varnost v letalstvu (EASA), Evropski agenciji za kemikalije (ECHA), Evropski agenciji za varnost hrane (EFSA) in Evropski agenciji za zdravila (EMA).
The audit examined if the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) had managed this programme well for that period.
Pri reviziji je bilo preučeno, ali sta Komisija in ESZD v tem obdobju dobro upravljali neposredno finančno podporo PEGASE.
The audit examined the effectiveness of EU support for the electoral process, the justice and police and public finance management reforms, as well as the decentralisation process.
Pri reviziji je bila preučena uspešnost podpore EU volilnemu procesu, reformam pravosodja, policije in upravljanja javnih financ ter procesu decentralizacije.
The audit examined the effectiveness of the Commission’s verification of GNI data in relation to the years 2002 to 2007 used for own resources, which became definitive in 2012.
Pri reviziji Sodišča je bila pregledana uspešnost preverjanja podatkov o BND za leta od 2002 do 2007, ki se uporabljajo za namene lastnih sredstev, ki ga je opravila Komisija.
The audit examined the nature of actions co-financed by the European Social Fund (ESF), aimed at combating early school leaving (ESL), in six Member States (Spain, France, Ireland, Netherlands, Portugal and the United Kingdom).
Z revizijo se je v šestih državah članicah (v Španiji, Franciji, na Irskem, Nizozemskem, Portugalskem in v Združenem kraljestvu) preverila narava trenutno izvajanih ukrepov, ki jih z namenom preprečevanja zgodnjega opuščanja izobraževanja (ZOI) sofinancira Evropski socialni sklad (ESS).
The audit examined the use made of these and other funds and whether there were adequate systems to implement the hygiene standards.
Pri reviziji je bilo preučeno, kako so bila porabljena ta in druga sredstva ter ali obstajajo ustrezni sistemi za izvajanje higienskih standardov.
The audit examined to what extent ‘Networks of Excellence’ and ‘Integrated projects’ had contributed to achieve the research policy objectives set by the Treaty as well as their own specific objectives, the Commission had effectively managed the new instruments and FP6 had stimulated RTD investment.
V okviru revizije je bilo preučeno, v kolikšnem obsegu so "mreže odličnosti" in "integrirani projekti" prispevali k doseganju ciljev raziskovalne politike, določenih s Pogodbo, in doseganju lastnih posebnih ciljev, kako uspešno je Komisija upravljala nove instrumente in v kolikšni meri je 6.OP spodbujal naložbe v RTR.
The audit examined whether EU funded actions have been designed in accord with identified needs and carried out as planned, and whether the governance arrangements have been adequate.
Med revizijo je bilo preučeno, ali so bile dejavnosti, ki jih je financirala EU, zasnovane v skladu z ugotovljenimi potrebami in so se izvajale po načrtu, ter ali so bile ureditve na področju upravljanja ustrezne.
The audit examined whether the financial and human resources allocated to the health sector reflected the EC’s policy commitments and whether the Commission had speeded up the implementation of this aid.
Z revizijo je bilo preučeno, ali so finančni in človeški viri, dodeljeni zdravstvenemu sektorju, odražali zaveze politike ES in ali je Komisija pospešila izvajanje te pomoči.
The audit examined whether:
Z revizijo se je pregledalo:
The audit examined which factors accounted for the failure of the concession process and for the reported delays and cost overruns of technological development.
Med revizijo je bilo preučeno, kateri dejavniki so bili odgovorni za neuspešnost koncesijskega postopka ter za zamude in prekoračitve stroškov tehnološkega razvoja.
The audit examined:
Z revizijo je bilo preučeno:
The audit findings are based on an analysis of the documents relating to the programming and implementation of the pre-accession assistance, audits of a sample of 16 projects, interviews with Commission staff, and interviews with the Croatian ministries, agencies and regional and local authorities involved in the management of EU funds.
Revizijske ugotovitve temeljijo na analizi dokumentov o programskem načrtovanju in izvajanju predpristopne pomoči, reviziji vzorca s 16 projekti, pogovorih z uslužbenci Komisije ter pogovorih s hrvaškimi ministrstvi, agencijami ter regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, ki sodelujejo pri upravljanju sredstev EU.
The audit focused on EU direct development support for the three dimensions of food security, i.e. food availability, access to food and food utilisation (nutrition).
Sodišče se je pri reviziji osredotočilo na neposredno razvojno podporo EU za tri razsežnosti zanesljive preskrbe s hrano, tj. razpoložljivost hrane, dostop do hrane in izkoristek hrane (prehrano).
The audit focused on Public Finance Management (PFM) and the fight against corruption on the one hand and human rights and democracy on the other hand.
Revizija je bila osredotočena na upravljanje javnih financ in boj proti korupciji ter hkrati na človekove pravice in demokracijo.
The audit focused on the design and implementation arrangements for PEGASE DFS as well as the results of PEGASE DFS and their sustainability.
Revizija je bila osredotočena na zasnovo in ureditve za izvajanje neposredne finančne podpore PEGASE ter na njene rezultate in njihovo trajnost.
The audit focused on the organization, decision-making and monitoring processes of the Commission during the period between 2008 - 2010, but did not assess the validity of the decisions taken by the Commission.
Revizija je bila usmerjena v organizacijo ter postopke za odločanje in spremljanje na Komisiji v obdobju 2008–2010, ni pa se preverjala umestnost odločitev Komisije.
The audit focused on the technical, financial and institutional sustainability of road transport infrastructure and looked at 48 programmes financed since 1995 under the 8th, 9th and 10th EDFs in six partner countries: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Tanzania and Zambia where EU auditors inspected about 2400 km of EDF funded roads.
Revizija je bila osredotočena na tehnično trajnost, finančno vzdržnost in institucionalno trajnost infrastrukture za cestni promet, pregledanih pa je bilo 48 programov, financiranih od leta 1995 v okviru osmega, devetega in desetega ERS v šestih državah partnericah: Benin, Burkina Faso, Kamerun, Čad, Tanzanija in Zambija, kjer so revizorji EU pregledali približno 2400 km cest, financiranih iz ERS.
The audit focused on the technical, financial and institutional sustainability of road transport infrastructure and looked at 48 programmes financed since 1995 under the 8th, 9th and 10th EDFs in six partner countries: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Tanzania and Zambia.
Revizija je bila osredotočena na tehnično trajnost, finančno vzdržnost in institucionalno trajnost infrastrukture za cestni promet, pregledanih pa je bilo 48 programov, financiranih od leta 1995 v okviru osmega, devetega in desetega ERS v šestih državah partnericah: Benin, Burkina Faso, Kamerun, Čad, Tanzanija in Zambija.
The audit focussed on the “grubbing-up” and “restructuring and conversion of vineyards” measures, the two largest areas of spending.
Revizija je bila osredotočena na ukrepa „izkrčitve“ ter „prestrukturiranja in preusmeritve vinogradov“, ki sta največji področji porabe.
The audit found cases where Member States did not verify whether other BTI applications or different BTI existed for the same good, were slow in issuing a BTI, or did not update the EU-wide BTI database on time.
Pri reviziji so bili ugotovljeni primeri, ko države članice niso preverile, ali za isto blago obstajajo tudi drugi zahtevki za izdajo ZTI ali druge ZTI, ko so potrebovale veliko časa za izdajo ZTI in ko niso pravočasno posodabljale podatkovne zbirke za ZTI, ki se uporablja po vsej Evropi.
The audit found that all the projects audited added capacity and quality to the road networks and resulted in travelling time savings and improved road safety.
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta se zaradi vseh revidiranih projektov zmogljivost in kakovost cestnih omrežij povečali ter da se je skrajšal potovalni čas in izboljšala varnost v cestnem prometu.
The audit found that over the course of FP7 the Commission has introduced a number of changes which have simplified the rules for participation.
OP uvedla številne spremembe, s katerimi je poenostavila pravila za udeležbo.
The audit found that several aspects of the programming of funding need strengthening, there is scope for savings by making more use of competitive tendering and the complex management system currently in place needs simplification.
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da je treba okrepiti več vidikov programiranja financiranja ter da bi bilo s pogostejšo uporabo konkurenčnih razpisnih postopkov mogoče doseči prihranke, sedanji kompleksen upravljavski sistem pa je treba poenostaviti.
The audit found that that overall the Commission and the Member States have, only to a limited extent, achieved value for money through the measures for diversifying the rural economy, as the aid was not systematically directed to the projects that were most likely to achieve the purpose of the measures.
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da so Komisija in države članice z ukrepi za diverzifikacijo podeželskega gospodarstva na splošno le v omejenem obsegu dosegle stroškovno učinkovitost, saj pomoči niso sistematično usmerjale v projekte, za katere je bilo najverjetneje, da bodo dosegli namen ukrepov.
The audit found that the Commission successfully coordinated implementation of NCTS.
Z revizijo je bilo ugotovljeno, da je Komisija uspešno usklajevala izvajanje NCTS.
The audit found that the execution of the 14 TEN-T priority projects is currently behind schedule.
Revizija je pokazala, da izvajanje 14 prednostnih projektov TEN-T trenutno poteka počasneje kot je bilo načrtovano.
The audit found that the flexibility of the Rural Development Regulation (broad objectives, lack of priorities) and the lack of a clear strategy in the Member State programmes has led to a situation where it is unclear to which objective the funds have contributed.
Med revizijo je bilo ugotovljeno, da sta prožnost uredbe o razvoju podeželja (široko zastavljeni cilji, pomanjkanje prednostnih nalog) in pomanjkanje jasne strategije v programih držav članic privedla do razmer, kjer ni jasno, h kateremu cilju so prispevala sredstva.
The audit found that the framework put in place to ensure that this support would only be provided in clearly defined cases is insufficient.
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da okvir za zagotovitev, da se ta podpora dodeli le v jasno opredeljenih primerih, ni zadosten.
The audit found that the lack of a mechanism to target scarce resources on pre-selected objectives resulted in a lack of critical mass of good projects to promote meaningful developments in EU environmental policy.
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da je to, da ni bilo mehanizma za ciljno usmerjanje omejenih sredstev na vnaprej izbrane cilje, povzročilo, da ni bilo kritične mase dobrih projektov, ki bi spodbujali pomemben razvoj okoljske politike EU.
The audit found that the programmes were not effective: the outputs achieved did not meet the targets set by EU policymakers and little impact was achieved in shifting freight off the roads.
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da programa nista bila uspešna: doseženi izidi niso ustrezali ciljem, ki so jih določili načrtovalci politike EU, učinek preusmeritve tovornega prometa s cest pa je bil majhen.
The audit found weaknesses in the design of the measure which significantly hinders its successful implementation: at the Commission level, the situation in the forestry sector in the EU was not specifically analysed so as to justify the proposal of specific financial support for improving the economic value of forests of private owners or municipalities.
Pri reviziji so bile ugotovljene pomembne slabosti pri zasnovi ukrepa, ki močno ovirajo njegovo uspešno izvajanje: na ravni Komisije razmere v gozdarskem sektorju EU niso bile analizirane posebej za to, da bi se utemeljil predlog za posebno finančno podporo za povečanje gospodarske vrednosti gozdov v zasebni lasti ali v lasti občin.
The audit has shown that the institutions have adopted different approaches when responding to rising translation demand.
Revizija je pokazala, da so institucije sprejele različne pristope pri odzivu na naraščajoče potrebe po prevodih.
The audit has shown that the quality of interpretation mostly meets needs and expectations, but that a number of measures need to be taken to reduce cost and to avoid the provision of interpretation that was requested but not used.
Revizija je pokazala, da kakovost tolmačenja večinoma ustreza potrebam in pričakovanjem, da pa je treba sprejeti precej ukrepov za zmanjšanje stroškov in da se prepreči zagotavljanje tolmačenja, ki je zahtevano, nato pa ni izkoriščeno.
The audit highlighted good practices on how to further shorten time to grant.
Pri reviziji so bile poudarjene dobre prakse za dodatno skrajšanje časa do dodelitve nepovratnih sredstev.
The audit highlighted weaknesses in the two instruments currently used by the Commission to integrate water concerns into the CAP (namely cross-compliance and rural development) and pointed out delays and weaknesses in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive.
Revizija je ugotovila slabosti pri obeh instrumentih, ki ju Komisija trenutno uporablja za vključevanje vprašanj v zvezi z vodo v SKP (tj. navzkrižna skladnost in razvoj podeželja), ter zamude in slabosti pri izvajanju okvirne direktive o vodah.
The audit highlighted weaknesses in the two instruments currently used to integrate water concerns into the CAP (namely cross-compliance and rural development) and pointed out delays and weaknesses in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive.
Revizija je ugotovila slabosti pri obeh instrumentih, ki se trenutno uporabljata za vključevanje vprašanj v zvezi z vodo v SKP (tj. navzkrižna skladnost in razvoj podeželja), ter zamude in slabosti pri izvajanju okvirne direktive o vodah.
The audit identified the need for the Commission to make better use of the management information it receives to ensure that economic, efficient and effective use is made of ESF funding.
Pri reviziji je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi morala Komisija bolje izkoristiti prejete upravljavske informacije in tako zagotoviti gospodarno, učinkovito in uspešno porabo sredstev iz ESS.
The audit included a sample of seventeen EU interventions in Kosovo.
Revizija je zajela vzorec sedemnajstih posredovanj EU na Kosovu.
The audit included an examination of four operational programmes and a sample of 24 energy efficiency investment projects in public buildings.
Revizija je vključevala preučitev štirih operativnih programov in vzorec 24 projektov naložb v energetsko učinkovitost javnih stavb.
The audit involved co-financed road projects in Germany (DE), Greece (EL), Poland (PL) and Spain (ES).
Revizija je zajela sofinancirane cestne projekte v Nemčiji, Grčiji, na Poljskem in v Španiji.
The audit makes a valuable contribution to the debate about Smart Regulation and should help the EU Institutions and Member States to progress on this shared agenda.
Revizija je veliko prispevala k razpravi o oblikovanju pametnih predpisov ter bi morala pomagati institucijam EU in državam članicam, da dosežejo napredek glede tega skupnega programa.
The audit of the Court aimed to assess whether information exchanges between Member States take place in a timely and effective manner and are supported by sound procedures and adequate administrative structures.
Sodišče je z revizijo želelo oceniti, ali so izmenjave informacij med državami članicami pravočasne in uspešne ter ali jih podpirajo trdni postopki in ustrezne upravne strukture.
The audit of the Court focussed on the process of producing European statistics.
Revizija, ki jo je izvedlo Sodišče, je bila osredotočena na proces priprave evropske statistike.
The audit of the management of the BTI procedure in the Commission and in a sample of Member States led the Court to conclude that the Commission’s management was adequate and that the six Member States audited have largely applied the legal provisions.
Sodišče je na podlagi revizije upravljanja postopka ZTI na Komisiji in v vzorcu držav članic zaključilo, da je bilo Komisijino upravljanje ustrezno in da je šest revidiranih držav članic v veliki meri uporabljajo pravne določbe.
The audit process began in June 2008, and the Court has examined more than 100 Commission Impact Assessments produced from 2003-2008, and interviewed around 190 people.
Postopek revizije se je začel junija 2008, Sodišče pa je pregledalo več kot 100 ocen učinkov, ki jih je Komisija pripravila v obdobju 2003–2008, ter opravilo pogovore s približno 190 osebami.
The audit revealed weaknesses in the application of the rules and procedures in the Member States visited which are summarised below.
Revizija je v obiskanih državah članicah pokazala slabosti pri uporabi pravil in postopkov, ki so povzete v nadaljevanju.
The audit showed that given the political and budgetary constraints they face the EU Institutions have managed to house their staff in appropriate conditions and have in the last few years improved the management of building expenditure.
Revizija je pokazala, da so institucije EU glede na politične in proračunske omejitve, s katerimi se soočajo, svojim uslužbencem uspele zagotoviti primerne pogoje nastanitve in da so v zadnjih nekaj letih izboljšale upravljanje odhodkov za zgradbe.
The audit showed that information exchanges can help Member States to assess taxation correctly and to prevent and detect fraud.
Revizija je pokazala, da lahko izmenjave informacij državam članicam pomagajo pri pravilni odmeri obdavčitve ter pri preprečevanju in odkrivanju goljufij.
The audit shows that the Commission has the right structures in place to deliver on its smart regulation agenda.
Revizija kaže, da je Komisija vzpostavila prave strukture za uspešno izvajanje programa za oblikovanje pametnih predpisov.
The audit suggests that it is difficult for such programmes to have a demonstrable impact on citizens’ health.
Revizija kaže, da takšni programi težko opazno učinkujejo na zdravje državljanov.
The audit took place in the period November 2011 to February 2012 and covered a sample of five procurement procedures and 12 contracts for the construction of buildings and supply of furniture, concrete, pillars and seismic isolators.
Potekala je od novembra 2011 do februarja 2012 in je zajela vzorec petih postopkov za oddajo javnega naročila in 12 pogodb o oddaji javnega naročila za gradnjo stavb in dobavo pohištva, betona, stebrov in potresnih izolatorjev.
The audit was carried out at the Commission and in seven Member States (Denmark, Spain, France, Italy, Poland, Portugal and the UK) selected on the basis of the size of their fishing fleets and the resources available for adapting their fishing fleets under the EFF.
Revizija je bila opravljena na Komisiji in v sedmih državah članicah (Danska, Španija, Francija, Italija, Poljska, Portugalska in Združeno kraljestvo), izbranih na podlagi velikosti njihovih ribolovnih flot in sredstev ESR, ki so bila na voljo za prilagoditev teh flot.
The audit was carried out at the Commission and in three Member States that were amongst the main beneficiaries of these measures.
Revizija je bila izvedena v službah Komisije in v treh državah članicah, ki so bile med glavnimi državami upravičenkami teh ukrepov.
The audit was carried out from March to December 2011 at the Commission and in the five Member States which accounted for most of the expenditure in relation to projects financed during the 2000‑2006 and 2007‑2013 programming periods: Germany, the United Kingdom, Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic.
Revizija je bila izvedena med marcem in decembrom 2011 na Komisiji in v petih državah članicah z največjimi odhodki za projekte, ki so se financirali v programskih obdobjih 2000–2006 in 2007–2013: v Nemčiji, Združenem kraljestvu, na Madžarskem, Poljskem in Češkem.