natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The deal, estimated to be worth up to EUR 19 billion in new trade for EU exporters, will remove virtually all tariffs between the two economies, as well as many non-tariff barriers.
Sporazum, za katerega se ocenjuje, da bo z novo trgovino ustvaril do 19 milijard EUR, bo med obema gospodarstvoma odstranil tako rekoč vse tarifne in mnoge netarifne ovire.
The death of Muammar Gaddafi marks the end of an era of despotism and repression from which the Libyan people have suffered for too long.
Smrt Muamerja Gadafija pomeni konec despotizma in zatiranja, ki sta vse predolgo pestila Libijce.
The death penalty concerns everyone’s right to life.
Smrtna kazen zadeva pravico vsakogar do življenja.
The death penalty is cruel and inhuman, it violates human dignity and the fundamental human rights on which the two organisations are founded.
Smrtna kazen je kruta in nečloveška ter znak skrajnega nespoštovanja človeškega dostojanstva in temeljnih človekovih pravic, na katerih temeljita obe organizaciji.
The death penalty offends human dignity.
Smrtna kazen žali človeško dostojanstvo.
The debate about cloning for food purposes started a few years ago when cloned embryos were imported into the EU.
Razprava o kloniranju za živila se je začela pred nekaj leti, ko so se v EU začeli uvažati klonirani zarodki.
The debate about the policy's future after 2013 is in full swing, and the Commission is expected to adopt an important Green Paper on territorial cohesion just before OPEN DAYS.
Razprava o prihodnosti politike po letu 2013 je v polnem teku, Komisija pa bo po pričakovanjih neposredno pred DNEVI ODPRTIH VRAT sprejela pomembno zeleno knjigo o ozemeljski koheziji.
The debate addressed the future perspectives and most possible suitable models of governance and long-term funding of the GMES programme.
Obravnavani so bili obeti za prihodnost ter najbolj izvedljivi in ustrezni modeli za upravljanje in dolgoročno financiranje programa GMES.
The debate also comes at a crucial stage of the negotiations for the future programmes 2014-2020.
Razprava poteka v odločilni fazi pogajanj o prihodnjem programu 2014–2020.
The debate also needs to address the potential negative effects of such systems - such as the risk that rights are concentrated in the hands of a few large companies to the detriment of small coastal fishing communities - and the way they could be addressed.
Razprava se mora dotakniti tudi možnih negativnih učinkov takih sistemov – kot je na primer nevarnost, da bi bila večina pravic v rokah majhnega števila velikih družb na škodo majhnih obalnih ribiških skupnosti – ter načinov za preprečevanje teh negativnih učinkov.
The debate among CoR members focused in particular on the progress made by Turkey and the relations between Turkey and Greece.
Razprava med člani OR se je osredotočila zlasti na napredek, ki ga je dosegla Turčija, in na odnose med Turčijo in Grčijo.
The debate and the adoption of a specific CoR resolution will provide the opportunity to clarify these questions and to better understand the implications of the new rules for national and regional investments.
Razprava o posebni resoluciji OR in njeno sprejetje bo priložnost za pojasnitev teh vprašanj in zagotovitev boljšega razumevanja posledic novih pravil za nacionalne in regionalne naložbe.
The debate can be followed live on via web stream.
Razpravo bo mogoče spremljati v živo preko prenosa na spletu.
The debate can be followed live on via web stream.
Razpravo bo mogoče spremljati v živo preko prenosa po spletu.
The debate can be followed live via web stream.
Razpravo bo mogoče spremljati v živo prek prenosa po spletu.
The debate comes at a crucial time, as the proposals for the new Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 are at a final phase.
Razprava poteka v ključnem trenutku, saj so predlogi za novo kohezijsko politiko za obdobje 2014–2020 v sklepni fazi.
The debate concentrated on a possible compromise presented in the Danish discussion paper, and a large majority of member states supported the text.
Razprava je bila namenjena predvsem možnosti sprejetja kompromisnega predloga, ki ga je dansko predsedstvo predstavilo v dokumentu za razpravo; besedilo je podprla velika večina držav članic.
The debate concentrated on the actions envisaged to address new challenges within the second pillar as well as the instruments proposed under rural development and their definition.
Razpravljali so predvsem o ukrepih za reševanje novih izzivov v okviru drugega stebra ter o predlaganih instrumentih za razvoj podeželja in njihovi opredelitvi.
The debate concentrated on the following elements contained in the agreement:
Razprava je bila usmerjena v naslednje elemente dogovora:
The debate concentrated on the principal measures proposed to increase the effectiveness of the 2005 reform:
Razprava je bila osredotočena na najpomembnejše predlagane ukrepe za dosego večje učinkovitosti reforme iz leta 2005, s katerimi naj bi zagotovili:
The debate concentrated on the proposed structure for direct payments for 2014-2020, as well as on the distribution of direct payments between Member States and within Member States.
Razprava se je osredotočila na predlagano strukturo neposrednih plačil za obdobje 2014–2020 ter na razdelitev neposrednih plačil med državami članicami in znotraj držav članic.
The debate concentrated on three main subjects dealing with targets in the post-2010 strategy, the need to ensure a better interaction between research, research-based innovation and education, as well as a substantial simplification of administrative processes and rules for research funding.
Razprava se je osredotočila na tri glavne teme, in sicer na cilje strategije po letu 2010, potrebo po zagotavljanju boljše interakcije med raziskavami, inovacijami, ki temeljijo na raziskavah, in izobraževanjem ter na znatno poenostavitev upravnih postopkov in pravil za financiranje raziskav.
The debate constitutes a preliminary step to the December 2009 Competitiveness Council, where the current EU Presidency intends to submit a set of conclusions in order to provide an input for the future European Innovation Act, for which the next European Commission is expected to table proposals by early 2010.
Razprava je del priprav na zasedanje Sveta za konkurenčnost decembra 2009, na katerem namerava sedanje predsedstvo EU predložiti niz sklepov, in sicer kot prispevek za prihodnji evropski akt o inovativnosti, za katerega bo naslednja Evropska komisija dala predloge predvidoma do začetka leta 2010.
The debate covered provisions contained in three of the main proposals of the CAP reform package:
Razpravljali so o določbah treh glavnih predlogov uredb iz reformnega svežnja SKP:
The debate covered the following elements:
Teme razprave so bile:
The debate culminated in the adoption of the Territorial Agenda and its Action Plan by Member States last year ().
Države članice so lani sprejele teritorialno agendo in njen akcijski načrt ().
The debate enabled a clearer picture to be obtained of the member states' positions on the main issues and of the state of negotiations.
Razprava je omogočila podrobno seznanitev s stališči držav članic o ključnih vprašanjih in stanjem pogajanj.
The debate established that the EMFF should be used to foster innovation and selectivity, environmental protection, data collection, scientific research and advice, and control of fishing operations.
V razpravi je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi morali ESPR uporabljati za spodbujanje inovacij in selektivnosti, varstva okolja, zbiranja podatkov, znanstvenih raziskav in svetovanja ter nadzora nad ribolovnimi dejavnostmi.
The debate focused first of all on the consumer side and on how consumers can be stimulated to change their driving behaviour in a more environmentally friendly way.
Razprava se je najprej osredotočila na potrošnika in vprašanje, kako bi potrošnike lahko spodbudili k spremembi njihovega vedenja v prometu, da bi postalo okolju prijaznejše.
The debate focused in particular on questions concerning:
Razprava je bila osredotočena predvsem na vprašanja o:
The debate focused in particular on the planned Afghan elections in August, the EU's policy and its cooperation with other partners, in particular the US, as well as EU activities such as the EU's police mission to Afghanistan (EUPOL Afghanistan).
Razprava je bila osredotočena zlasti na avgustovske volitve v Afganistanu, politiko EU in njeno sodelovanje z drugimi partnerji, zlasti z ZDA, ter na dejavnosti EU, kot je policijska misija EU v Afganistanu (EUPOL Afghanistan).
The debate focused on four issues: the air traffic management performance scheme; the functional airspace blocks; the SESAR (SES air traffic management research) programme, which is the technological pillar of the SES; and an update of the SES regulatory framework to be presented by the Commission.
Razprava je bila posvečena štirim vprašanjem: izvedbenemu načrtu za upravljanje zračnega prometa; funkcionalnim blokom zračnega prostora; programu SESAR (raziskavam o upravljanju zračnega prometa v okviru EEN), ki je tehnološki steber EEN, in posodobitvi regulatornega okvira EEN, ki jo bo pripravila Komisija.
The debate focused on four pillars which need urgent attention as a result of the economic crisis:
Med razpravo so se usmerili na štiri stebre, ki jim je zaradi gospodarske krize treba nujno nameniti pozornost:
The debate focused on key aspects of the proposal and provided guidance in order to continue examination under the Council-Parliament codecision procedure.
Razprava se je osredotočila na ključne vidike predloga in podala smernice za nadaljnjo obravnavo v okviru postopka soodločanja med Svetom in Parlamentom.
The debate focused on key elements of the draft directive (10642/11), including :
Razprava je bila osredotočena na ključne elemente osnutka direktive (10642/11), vključno z:
The debate focused on the following aspects:
Razprava je bila usmerjena v naslednje vidike:
The debate focused on the following points:
Razprava je bila usmerjena predvsem na naslednje teme:
The debate focused on the main aspects of the draft regulation contained in the Presidency progress report, including the utility parameter, the slope of the curve, the system of penalties, the starting date and the long-term objectives.
Osredotočena je bila na glavne vidike osnutka uredbe iz poročila predsedstva o napredku, tudi na kazalec uporabnosti, strmino krivulje, sistem kaznovanja, začetni datum in dolgoročne cilje.
The debate focused on the main aspects of the Green Paper presented by the Commission in April 2007 (8322/07 +ADD1).
Razprava se je osredotočila na glavne vidike zelene knjige, ki jo je Komisija predstavila aprila 2007 (8322/07 +ADD1).
The debate focused on the main principles of a future agreement for creating a common patent court that would ensure compliance with the EU treaties, as requested by the Court of Justice of the EU in its Opinion 1/09 on the compatibility of the envisaged system with EU law .
V razpravi so bila obravnavana predvsem najpomembnejša načela prihodnjega sporazuma o ustanovitvi enotnega sodišča za reševanje sporov v zvezi s patenti, ki naj bi v skladu z zahtevo Sodišča EU, navedeno v mnenju 1/09 o združljivosti predvidenega sistema s pravom EU, zagotovila skladnost s pogodbami EU.
The debate focused on the new general legal framework.
Ministri so v razpravi največ pozornosti posvetili novemu splošnemu pravnemu okviru.
The debate focused on the overall target, the benchmark goals and the implementing strategy set out in the White Paper.
Razprava je bila usmerjena v splošni cilj, ciljne stopnje in izvedbeno strategijo iz bele knjige.
The debate focused on the priority measures to be implemented, notably for the benefit of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and on how to articulate the EU's industrial, commercial and competition policies effectively.
Razprava je bila osredotočena na prednostne ukrepe, ki jih bo treba izvesti predvsem v korist malih in srednjih podjetij (MSP), in na vprašanje, kako naj EU učinkovito oblikuje industrijsko in gospodarsko politiko ter politiko konkurence.
The debate focused on the proposed pilot project for Malta on internal reallocation of beneficiaries of international protection as well as on the role and development of Frontex operations , especially in the Mediterranean region.
Med razpravo so se osredotočili na predlagani pilotni projekt za Malto o notranji premestitvi oseb, ki uživajo mednarodno zaščito, ter o vlogi in razvoju operacij Frontex , zlasti v Sredozemlju.
The debate focused on the situation following the presidential elections held on 20 August.
Razprava je bila usmerjena na razmere po predsedniških volitvah, ki so potekale 20. avgusta.
The debate focused on three questions:
Razprava se je osredotočila na tri vprašanja:
The debate focused on two broad issues:
Razprava se je osredotočila na dve širši vprašanji:
The debate focused on two key aspects of the proposal: the processes and practices to close the research and innovation gap between European regions in order to better address the objectives of the European Research Area, and finding the most suitable governance structure while maintaining the objectives of simplification.
Razprava se je osredotočila na dva ključna vidika predloga: postopke in prakse za odpravljanje vrzeli na raziskovalnem in inovacijskem področju med evropskimi regijami, da bi bolje izpolnjevali cilje evropskega raziskovalnega prostora, ter iskanje najprimernejše ureditve upravljanja ob ohranitvi ciljev poenostavitve.
The debate focused on two key issues with a view to the Council providing guidance for further discussions.
Udeleženci so razpravljali o dveh ključnih vprašanjih, na podlagi katerih naj bi usmerili prihodnje razprave v Svetu.
The debate focused on two key issues:
Razpravljalo se je predvsem o dveh ključnih vprašanjih:
The debate focused on two key subjects:
Ključni temi razprave sta bili:
The debate focused on two main subjects:
Glavni temi razprave sta bili:
The debate focused on two main subjects:
Razprava je bila usmerjena v dve glavni zadevi:
The debate focused on two of those priorities mostly affecting environmental issues: pursuing differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation and promoting growth and competitiveness for today and tomorrow.
V razpravi so se osredotočili na dve od teh prednostnih nalog, ki najbolj vplivata na okoljska vprašanja: prizadevanje za fiskalno konsolidacijo, ki je prilagojena posameznim državam in spodbuja rast, ter spodbujanje rasti in konkurenčnosti zdaj in v prihodnje.
The debate focused on whether implementing powers under the directive should be conferred on the Commission or on the Council.
Osrednja tema razprave je bilo vprašanje, ali bi bilo treba izvedbena pooblastila v skladu z direktivo prenesti na Komisijo ali na Svet.
The debate focused, in particular, on the following topic:
Razprava je bila osredotočena predvsem na naslednjo temo:
The debate focused, in particular, on the objectives and scope of the future instrument, the nature of the competent authorities which would be able to act under the Framework Decision, and the communication procedures.
Razprava se je zlasti osredotočila na cilje in področje uporabe prihodnjega instrumenta, naravo pristojnih organov, ki bi lahko delovali na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa, in postopke komunikacije.
The debate focussed on two questions from the Presidency (12996/07),
Razprava se je osredotočila na vprašanji, ki ju je predlagalo predsedstvo (),
The debate followed a Commission presentation on this proposal issued on 25 March 2009.
Pred razpravo je Komisija predstavila predlog, ki je bil objavljen 25. marca 2009.
The debate followed a presentation by the Commission of its communication "A reinforced European Research Area partnership for excellence and growth” (12848/12), published on 17 July 2012, together with the communication “Towards better access to scientific information: Boosting the benefits of public investments in research” (12847/12) and a recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information (13983/12).
Pred razpravo je Komisija predstavila svoje sporočilo z naslovom "Okrepljeno partnerstvo za odličnost in rast v Evropskem raziskovalnem prostoru" (12848/12), ki je bilo objavljeno 17. julija 2012, skupaj s sporočilom "Boljšemu dostopu do znanstvenih informacij naproti: izboljšanje učinkovitosti javnih naložb v raziskave" (12847/12) ter priporočilom o dostopu do znanstvenih informacij in njihovem arhiviranju (13983/12).
The debate followed a presentation by the Commission of the proposal issued on 30 November 2011 (17932/11).
Pred razpravo je Komisija predstavila svoj predlog z dne 30. novembra 2011 (17932/11).
The debate followed the statement issued by the Heads of State or Government of the EU Member States participating in enhanced cooperation on the creation of unitary patent protection in which they made a commitment to reach a final agreement on the last outstanding issue in the patent package in June 2012 at the latest (5/12).
Razprava je potekala po objavi izjave voditeljev držav ali vlad držav članic EU, udeleženih v okrepljenem sodelovanju za uvedbo enotnega patentnega varstva, v kateri so se zavezali, da bodo najpozneje junija 2012 dosegli dokončni dogovor o še zadnjem nerešenem vprašanju v zvezi s patentnim svežnjem (5/12).
The debate follows discussions at the ministerial meeting of 29 September 2011 (see press release 14691/11, page 9), on the basis of the draft agreement for creating a common patent court that would ensure compliance with the EU treaties.
Ta razprava je nadaljevanje razprav na ministrskem srečanju 29. septembra 2011 (glej sporočilo za javnost 14691/11, stran 9), temelji pa na osnutku sporazuma o ustanovitvi enotnega sodišča za patente, s katero bi zagotovili skladnost s pogodbami EU.
The debate identified a clear need for further work on initiatives targeting the three cross-cutting priorities identified by the Commission in order to improve the food supply chain:
V razpravi se je pokazalo, da je za izboljšanje verige preskrbe s hrano vsekakor treba nadaljevati delo v zvezi s pobudami za tri medsektorske prednostne naloge, opredeljene s strani Komisije, in sicer:
The debate in Coimbra will take place in the historic Universidade de Coimbra, which is one of Europe's oldest and most prestigious universities.
Razpravo v Coimbri bo gostila Universidade de Coimbra, ki je ena najstarejših in najprestižnejših univerz v Evropi.
The debate in Sofia which will take place on 23 July will be opened by the President of the Bulgarian Republic Mr. Rosen Plevneliev.
Razpravo v Sofiji 23. julija bo otvoril predsednik Republike Bolgarije Rosen Plevneliev.
The debate in Thessaloniki will take place in the central Conference Centre of Thessaloniki ("Velidio").
Razprava v Solunu bo potekala v osrednjem konferenčnem centru v Solunu („Velidio“).
The debate initiated by the Presidency was based on the outcome of a conference which had taken place in Sopot, Poland, in July 2011.
Razprava, ki jo je predlagalo predsedstvo, je temeljila na rezultatih konference, ki je bila julija 2011 v Sopotu na Poljskem.
The debate is moderated by three Editors in chief, namely Matthieu Croissandeau (L'Obs), Béatrice Delvaux (Le Soir), and Karel Verhoeven (De Standaard).
Pogovor bodo vodili glavni uredniki Matthieu Croissandeau (L'Obs), Béatrice Delvaux (Le Soir) in Karel Verhoeven (De Standaard).
The debate made possible a useful contribution to pursuing discussions in the Council preparatory bodies with a view to drawing up draft conclusions on this subject, which could be adopted by the Competitiveness Council in December (12855/08).
Razprava je bila koristen prispevek za nadaljnjo obravnavo v pripravljalnih telesih Sveta, da se v zvezi s tem oblikuje osnutek sklepov, ki bi ga lahko decembra sprejel Svet za konkurenčnost (12855/08).
The debate on achieving these aims will continue till the end of 2007 and the first proposed measures could be tabled in 2008.
Razprave o doseganju teh ciljev se bodo nadaljevale do konca leta 2007, prvi predlagani ukrepi pa naj bi bili dani v razpravo leta 2008.
The debate on direct payments focused on two elements of the proposal:
Osrednja tema razprave o neposrednih plačilih sta bila dva elementa predloga:
The debate on Europe's future continues…
Razprava o prihodnosti Evrope se nadaljuje ...
The debate on how to further strengthen economic governance has been gathering speed since May 2010, when the Commission proposed a strategy for strengthening economic governance in Europe (MEMO/10/204).
Razprava o možnostih za dodatno okrepitev gospodarskega upravljanja poteka že od maja 2010, ko je Komisija predlagala strategijo za okrepitev gospodarskega upravljanja v Evropi (MEMO/10/204).
The debate on how to improve the communication to consumers regarding animal welfare in livestock production has been running in the EU for several years.
Razprava o tem, kako izboljšati obveščanje potrošnikov o dobrem počutju živali v živinoreji, v EU poteka že več let.
The debate on preparation of the Doha Conference further enabled Ministers to broach the question of the possible repercussions of the international financial crisis for development aid.
Razprava o pripravi konference v Dohi je ministrom omogočila tudi, da obravnavajo vprašanje o možnih posledicah mednarodne finančne krize za razvojno pomoč.
The debate on the Commission communication provided an input for the Commission's preparation of the proposal for a revision of Council directive 2004/67/EC on measures to safeguard the security of natural gas supply.
Razprava o sporočilu Komisije pa je prispevala k delu Komisije pri pripravi predloga za revizijo Direktive Sveta 2004/67/ES o ukrepih za zagotavljanje zanesljivosti oskrbe z zemeljskim plinom.
the debate on the Commission proposals for the common agricultural policy (CAP) after 2013 which will be presented in October 2011.
razpravo o predlogih Komisije glede skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) po letu 2013, ki bodo predstavljeni oktobra 2011.
The debate on the EU Roma integration Strategy is another key social point on the agenda.
Razprava o strategiji EU za vključevanje Romov bo še ena od ključnih socialnih točk dnevnega reda.
The debate on the proposal for a regulation on the CFP focussed on the issue of a discard ban.
Glavna tema razprave o predlogu uredbe o SRP je bila prepoved zavržkov.
The debate on the proposal for a regulation on the CFP was focused on the issue of a discard ban as suggested by the Presidency.
Razprava o predlogu uredbe o SRP je bila usmerjena na vprašanje prepovedi zavržkov, kot je predlagalo predsedstvo.
The debate on the single CMO was the last one of this round.
Razprava o enotni SUT je bila zadnja razprava v tem krogu.
The debate on these issues will now start with the other EU institutions and with stakeholders.
Sedaj se bo začela razprava o teh vprašanjih z drugimi institucijami EU in interesnimi skupinami.
The debate on this issue will continue in 2009 after the Commission has published the results of a public consultation launched by the present communication.
Razprava glede tega vprašanja se bo nadaljevala leta 2009 po objavi rezultatov Komisije o javnih posvetovanjih, ki jih je začelo to sporočilo.
The debate pointed to where further efforts should be directed, especially if the EU wanted to meet the 2014 deadline for the completion of the internal energy market.
Na razpravi je bilo obravnavano vprašanje, kam je treba usmeriti dodatna prizadevanja, še zlasti če želi EU uresničiti cilj dokončanja notranjega energetskega trga do leta 2014.
The debate provided also the opportunity to present the establishment of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group at the Committee of the Regions promoted by Gordon Keymer, Member of Tandridge District Council (UK).
Zasedanje je bilo tudi priložnost za predstavitev ustanavljanja skupine evropskih konzervativcev in reformistov v OR, za katero se zavzema Gordon Keymer (UK), član okrajnega sveta Tandridge.
The debate provided guidance for the further work of the Council and its preparatory bodies on the draft directive in order to reach an early agreement.
Razprava je bila vodilo za nadaljnje delo v Svetu in njegovih pripravljalnih telesih v zvezi z osnutkom direktive, da bi bil dogovor mogoč čim prej.