natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court finds in that regard that, like married persons, persons entering into a PACS arrangement commit, within a specific legal framework, to living a life together and to providing material aid and assistance to each other.
Glede tega je Sodišče ugotovilo, da se slednje osebe, tako kot osebe, ki sklenejo zakonsko zvezo, v okviru natančno določenega pravnega okvira zavežejo za skupno življenje, medsebojno materialno in nematerialno pomoč.
The Court finds in this connection that the Framework Decision does not seek to harmonise the criminal offences in question in respect of their constituent elements or of the penalties which they attract.
Sodišče glede tega ugotavlja, da namen Okvirnega sklepa ni uskladitev zadevnih kaznivih dejanj v zvezi z njihovimi elementi ali kaznimi, ki so predpisane zanje.
The Court finds next that Directive 2004/38 does not confer any derived right of residence on third‑country nationals who are family members of an EU citizen residing in the Member State of which he is a national.
Nato je ugotovilo, da Direktiva 2004/38 ne daje nikakršne izvedene pravice do prebivanja državljanu tretje države, družinskemu članu državljana Unije, ki prebiva v državi članici, katere državljanstvo ima.
The Court finds that a company established in an EEA State which is proprietor of a vessel flying the flag of a third country may rely on the freedom to provide services where it provides maritime transport services from or to an EEA State, provided that it can, due to its operation of that vessel, be classed as the provider of those services and that the persons for whom the services are intended are established in EEA States other than that in which that company is established.
Sodišče ugotavlja, da se družba s sedežem v državi EGP, ki je lastnica plovila, ki pluje pod zastavo tretje države, in opravlja storitve pomorskega prevoza iz države EGP ali vanjo, lahko sklicuje na svobodo opravljanja storitev, če je mogoče šteti, da zato, ker upravlja to plovilo, opravlja te storitve, in če imajo prejemniki teh storitev sedež v drugih državah EGP kot v državi, v kateri ima sedež ta družba.
The Court finds that a situation such as that in issue in which a person whose state of health necessitates hospital treatment goes to another Member State and there receives the treatment in question for consideration falls within the scope of the provisions on freedom to provide services regardless of the way in which the national system with which that person is registered and from which reimbursement of those services is subsequently sought operates.
Sodišče meni, da je v taki situaciji, kot je ta v obravnavani zadevi, kjer oseba, ki zaradi svojega zdravstvenega stanja potrebuje bolnišnično zdravljenje, odide v drugo državo članico in tam prejme zadevno zdravljenje proti plačilu, sodi na področje uporabe določb o svobodi opravljanja storitev, pri čemer ni pomemben način delovanja nacionalnega sistema, kateremu ta oseba pripada in od katerega je naknadno zahtevano kritje teh storitev (90).
The Court finds that EU law did not oblige Slovakia to guarantee access to its territory to the President of Hungary.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da pravo Unije Slovaški ni nalagalo, da predsedniku Madžarske zagotovi vstop na njeno ozemlje.
The Court finds that in this case, there is a regulatory framework of mutual administrative assistance between Poland and the United States of America which permits the exchange of information required for the application of tax legislation.
Vendar je Sodišče ugotovilo, da v obravnavani zadevi obstaja regulativni okvir medsebojne upravne pomoči med Republiko Poljsko in Združenimi državami Amerike, na podlagi katerega je mogoča izmenjava informacij, ki so potrebne za uporabo davčne zakonodaje.
The Court finds that interpretation of provisions of law and assessment of facts and evidence constitute an essential part of judicial activity and may lead, in certain cases, to a manifest infringement of the applicable law.
Sodišče poudari, da sta razlaga pravnih pravil ter presoja dejstev in dokazov bistvena dela sodne dejavnosti in da lahko v določenih primerih pripeljeta do očitne kršitve upoštevnega prava.
The Court finds that rules such as those provided for under Polish law introduce a difference in the treatment of resident taxpayers according to whether health insurance contributions capable of being deducted from the amount of income tax due in Poland have or have not been paid under a national compulsory health insurance scheme.
Sodišče ugotavlja, da se z ureditvijo, kot je ta, določena v poljski zakonodaji, uvaja različno obravnavanje zavezancev rezidentov glede na to, ali so bili prispevki za zdravstveno zavarovanje, ki bi se lahko v tem znesku odbili od dohodnine, ki se dolguje na Poljskem, plačani v okviru nacionalnega sistema obveznega zdravstvenega zavarovanja.
The Court finds that the author of the act lacked powers
Sodišèe prve stopnje ugotavlja nepristojnost izdajatelja akta.
The Court finds that the Commission has not provided any specific examples showing that access charges have been set by the Czech authorities in disregard of the requirements under the directive.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da Komisija ni navedla konkretnih primerov, iz katerih bi bilo razvidno, da so češki organi uporabnine za dostop določili ob neupoštevanju zahtev iz direktive.
The Court finds that the decision is vitiated by an error of assessment in so far as the Commission seeks to establish Coats’ liability in respect of the period after 13 March 1997.
Sodišče prve stopnje ugotavlja, da odločba temelji na napačni presoji, in sicer v delu, v katerem poskuša Komisija dokazati odgovornost Coats za obdobje po 13. marcu 1997.
The Court finds that the freezing of funds provided for by the contested regulation does not infringe the applicants’ fundamental rights as protected by jus cogens.
Sodišče prve stopnje ugotavlja, da zamrznitev sredstev, ki jo določa izpodbijana uredba, ne krši temeljnih pravic tožečih strank, kot jih varuje jus cogens.
The Court finds that the letter is a decision open to an action and that Infront can seek its annulment
Sodišèe prve stopnje meni, da je ta dopis odloèba, zoper katero se lahko vloži tožba in da Infront lahko zahteva njeno razveljavitev.
The Court finds that the patient who was granted authorisation to receive hospital treatment in another Member State (the State of treatment), or received a refusal to authorise which was unfounded, is entitled to reimbursement by the competent institution of the cost of the treatment in accordance with the provisions of the legislation of the State of treatment, as if he were registered in that State.
Sodišče presodi, da ima pacient, čigar zahteva za bolnišnično zdravljenje v drugi državi članici (država zdravljenja) je bila odobrena ali pa neupravičeno zavrnjena, pravico do tega, da pristojni nosilec povrne stroške zdravljenja v skladu z določbami zakonodaje države zdravljenja, kot če bi pacient pripadal le-tej (125).
The Court finds that the periods of plenary part‑sessions as provided for in the contested votes for October 2012 and 2013 do not satisfy the requirements resulting from the Treaties concerning the seats of the institutions.
Ugotoviti je treba, da zasedanji, ki sta v izpodbijanih sklepih tako določeni za oktober 2012 in oktober 2013, ne ustrezata zahtevam o sedežih institucij, določenim v pogodbah.
The Court finds that the provisions at issue are liable to have such a deterrent effect.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da imajo lahko zadevne določbe tak odvračilni učinek.
The Court finds that there are too many errors in spending, but many mistakes are corrected, in particular when it comes to clawing back sums unduly paid.
Sodišče ugotavlja, da je bilo storjenih preveč napak pri porabi, vendar je veliko napak popravljenih, zlasti ko gre za vračanje neupravičeno izplačanih zneskov.
The Court finds that there are too many errors in the payments made to individual beneficiaries of various areas of EU spending.
Sodišče ugotavlja, da so napake pri plačilih posameznim upravičencem na različnih področjih porabe EU prepogoste.
The Court finds that there may be a rebuttable presumption that individuals are using recording media for private purposes, provided that two conditions are fulfilled: - (i) practical difficulties in determining whether the purpose of the use of media is private must warrant the establishment of such a presumption; (ii) that presumption must not result in the imposition of the private copying levy in cases where those media are clearly used for non-private purposes.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je mogoče domnevati – ta domneva se lahko ovrže – da zasebniki nosilce podatkov uporabljajo v zasebne namene, če sta izpolnjena ta pogoja: (i) praktične težave, povezane z ugotavljanjem, ali gre za zasebno uporabo nosilcev, morajo upravičiti določitev take domneve; (ii) ta domneva ne sme povzročiti tega, da se naloži pristojbina za zasebno razmnoževanje v primerih, v katerih se ti nosilci očitno ne uporabljajo v zasebne namene.
The Court finds that, even if the Court of First Instance made certain errors in its reasoning, its final conclusion that the Council was competent to adopt that regulation was not incorrect.
Sodišče je presodilo, da, čeprav je Sodišče prve stopnje pri svojem razlogovanju nekajkrat napačno uporabilo pravo, njegov končni sklep, da je bil Svet pristojen za sprejetje te uredbe, ni bil napačen.
The Court finds that, in the present case, it is not relevant to ascertain whether each of the regular meetings affects inter-State trade, but that the Commission could legitimately take into account the cumulative potential effect of all the meetings.
Sodišče prve stopnje je odločilo, da v tem primeru ni upoštevno ali je vsak izmed rednih sestankov vplival na trgovino med državami, ampak da je Komisija lahko zakonito upoštevala morebitni kumulativni učinek sestankov, ki so potekali v okviru skupine.
The Court finds that, in the present case, the retransmission of the works over the internet is aimed at all persons resident in the United Kingdom who have an internet connection and who claim to hold a television licence in that State.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je v obravnavanem primeru retransmisija del po internetu namenjena vsem osebam s prebivališčem v Združenem kraljestvu, ki se lahko povežejo z internetom in naj bi imeli televizijsko licenco v tej državi.
The Court finds weaknesses concerning the checks in agriculture and cohesion policies corresponding to weaknesses within Member State authorities.
Sodišče je odkrilo slabosti pri pregledih na področju kmetijstva in kohezijskih politik, ki sovpadajo s slabostmi v organih držav članic.
The Court finds, however, that Mr Jóri was not compelled to vacate office pursuant to such provisions.
Vendar Sodišče poudarja, da mandat A. Jórija ni prenehal iz takega razloga.
The Court first of all points out that, as a Romanian national, Mr Jipa enjoys the status of a citizen of the Union and may therefore rely on the rights pertaining to that status, in particular the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, including against his Member State of origin.
Sodišče najprej opozarja, da ima G. Jipa kot romunski državljan status državljana Unije in torej lahko, tudi proti svoji državi članici izvora, uveljavlja pravice, ki se nanašajo na tak status, predvsem pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic.
The Court first of all rejected the claims of Forum 187 for the annulment of the contested decision in so far as it classified the disputed measures as State aid incompatible with the common market.
Sodišče je najprej zavrnilo predloge Foruma 187 za razglasitev ničnosti izpodbijane odločbe, ker sporne ukrepe državnih pomoči opredeljuje za nezdružljive s skupnim trgom.
The Court first points out that the procedure intended to induce a defaulting Member State to comply with a judgment establishing a failure to fulfil obligations must be regarded as a special judicial procedure for the enforcement of the Court’s judgments and, in other words, as a method of enforcement.
Podredno, Sodišče opozarja, da je postopek ugotovitve, da država članica ni izvršila sodbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti države, treba šteti za poseben sodni postopek izvršitve sodb Sodišča in, z drugimi besedami, za način izvršbe.
The Court first recalls the principle that where common rules have been adopted the Member States no longer have the right to undertake obligations with non-member countries which affect those rules.
Sodišče najprej spomni, da države članice v primeru že sprejetih skupnih pravnih pravil niso upravičene sklepati takih obveznosti s tretjimi državami, ki bi lahko vplivale na ta skupna pravila.
The Court found a high frequency of errors due to outdated database information about the size of land parcels as well as weaknesses in the measurement checks of land areas conducted by national inspectors in a number of the Member States visited, namely Bulgaria, Romania, Greece, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands.
Sodišče je ugotovilo veliko pogostost napak, ki so nastale zaradi zastarelih informacij o velikosti zemljiških parcel v podatkovni zbirki ter zaradi slabosti pri pregledih meritev površin, ki so jih opravili nacionalni inšpektorji v več obiskanih državah članicah, namreč v Bolgariji, Romuniji, Grčiji, na Češkem in Nizozemskem.
The Court found an overall material level of error in three quarters of the transactions audited at final beneficiary level.
Sodišče je odkrilo splošno pomembno stopnjo napak pri treh četrtinah transakcij, revidiranih na ravni končnega upravičenca.
The Court found evidence of internal control checks being incompletely or inadequately carried out in many areas of the budget, both within Member States and at the Commission.
Sodišče je našlo dokaze, da pregledi v okviru notranje kontrole na številnih področjih proračuna niso bili ustrezno ali v celoti izvedeni niti v državah članicah niti v Komisiji.
The Court found evidence that:
Sodišče je našlo dokaze, da:
The Court found expenditure at Commission and delegation level to be mostly legal and regular, but detected a material level of error at project implementing organisations, including ineligible expenditure and non-compliance with contractual procedures.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so odhodki na ravni Komisije in delegacij večinoma zakoniti in pravilni, vendar je odkrilo pomembno stopnjo napak na ravni organizacij, ki izvajajo projekte, med katerimi so bili neupravičeni odhodki in neupoštevanje postopkov za oddajanje naročil.
The Court found limitations of scope and depth both at the level of the certifying bodies' work as well as at the level of the Commission's desk reviews of their certificates and reports.
Sodišče je ugotovilo omejen obseg in temeljitost tako na ravni dela certifikacijskih organov kot na ravni Komisijinih dokumentacijskih pregledov njihovih potrdil in poročil.
The Court found shortcomings concerning the design of the operational programmes, as well as the monitoring and evaluation systems.
Sodišče je odkrilo pomanjkljivosti v zasnovi operativnih programov ter sistemih za spremljanje in vrednotenje.
The Court found substantial weaknesses in these areas, which it concluded were sufficient to jeopardise the proper functioning of a fisheries management policy based on catch limitations.
Sodišče je na teh področjih ugotovilo veliko pomanjkljivosti, ki so po njegovem mnenju zadosten razlog za ogrozitev dobrega delovanja politike upravljanja ribištva, ki temelji na omejitvah ulova.
The court found that Antonella had settled into her social environment in Slovenia.
V zvezi s tem je presodilo, da se je Antonella vživela v socialno okolje v Sloveniji.
The Court found that Article 95 EC, read in conjunction with Article 25 of the directive, cannot justify Community competence to conclude the Agreement with the United States that is at issue.
Sodišče ugotavlja, da člen 95 ES, bran v povezavi s členom 25 direktive, ne ustvarja pristojnosti Skupnosti za sklenitev zadevnega sporazuma z Združenimi državami.
The Court found that in seven out of eight cases checked in rural development, the farmers audited had not met their commitments, or the commitments had not been checked effectively by the authorities.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da revidirani kmetje v sedmih od osmih preverjenih primerov na področju razvoja podeželja niso izpolnjevali svojih obveznosti ali pa pristojni organi teh obveznosti niso uspešno preverjali.
The Court found that it was not possible for the Commission or Member States to assess the contribution of the SOLID funds to integration, because audited Member States did not set proper targets or indicators for their annual programmes.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da niti Komisija niti države članice niso mogle oceniti prispevka skladov SOLID k vključevanju, ker revidirane države članice niso določile ustreznih ciljev in kazalnikov za svoje letne programe.
The Court found that long-term planning could be improved.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da bi bilo dolgoročno načrtovanje mogoče izboljšati.
The Court found that Member States approved measures in operational programmes on the basis of the nature of the proposed expenditure (is it eligible?), without also taking account of the likely effectiveness (will it advance the producer organisation towards its objectives?).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so države članice ukrepe v operativnih programih odobrile glede na vrsto predlaganih odhodkov (ali so upravičeni?), ne da bi pri tem upoštevale tudi njihovo verjetnost uspešnosti (ali bodo pomagali organizaciji proizvajalcev pri doseganju njenega cilja?).
The Court found that overall, the LIFE Environment component was not operating effectively because it was not sufficiently well designed and implemented.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da komponenta LIFE okolje na splošno ni uspešno delovala, ker ni bila dovolj dobro zasnovana in izvajana.
The Court found that the Commission did not adopt clear implementing rules and has not adequately supervised Member States when they distributed among their farmers the available support of around € 4.2 billion during the 2010-2012 period.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da Komisija ni sprejela jasnih izvedbenih pravil in ni ustrezno nadzorovala držav članic pri njihovi razdelitvi razpoložljive podpore v višini okoli 4,2 milijarde EUR v obdobju 2010–2012 med kmete.
The Court found that the Commission has a system in place to manage the implementation of the Court’s recommendations and the requests by the Parliament and Council, but this system needs to be strengthened to enable the Commission to respond in a timely, efficient, and effective manner.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da ima Komisija vzpostavljen sistem za spremljanje izvajanja priporočil Sodišča ter zahtev Parlamenta in Sveta, vendar ga je treba izboljšati, da se bo lahko Komisija pravočasno, učinkovito in uspešno odzivala.
The Court found that the Commission has made considerable efforts to address the weaknesses in the management of the risks to EU funds.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da si je Komisija močno prizadevala za odpravo pomanjkljivosti pri obvladovanju tveganj, ki so jim izpostavljena sredstva EU.
The Court found that the Commission has made considerable efforts to address the weaknesses in the management of the risks to the EU funds.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da si je Komisija močno prizadevala za odpravo pomanjkljivosti pri obvladovanju tveganj, ki so jim izpostavljena sredstva EU.
The Court found that the Commission's strategy lacked focus.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je bila strategija Komisije premalo osredotočena.
The Court found that the direct costs associated with managing the Fund by the Commission were low and so the Fund was considered to be working efficiently.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so neposredni stroški Komisijinega upravljanja sklada nizki, zato je prišlo do zaključka, da sklad posluje učinkovito.
The Court found that the financed projects, except the CASE project, were eligible according to the EUSF Regulation.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so bili financirani projekti razen projekta CASE v skladu z uredbo o SSEU upravičeni.
The Court found that the Fund did not provide a rapid response.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da sklad ni zagotavljal hitrega odziva.
The Court found that the projects selected by Member State authorities for financing did not have rational objectives in terms of cost-effectiveness, i.e. cost per unit of energy saved.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da projekti, ki so jih organi držav članic izbrali za financiranje, niso imeli racionalnih ciljev, kar zadeva stroškovno učinkovitost, tj. strošek na enoto prihranjene energije.
The court found that the UK citizen should have been treated the same as a French national in regards to compensation for his injuries, because as a tourist he was entitled to take advantage of the freedom of provision of services.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da bi moral biti državljan Združenega kraljestva obravnavan enako kot francoski državljan v zvezi z odškodnino za njegove poškodbe, saj je imel kot turist pravico izkoristiti prosto opravljanje storitev.
The Court found that the vast majority of the payment budget was again materially affected by errors of legality and regularity in the underlying transactions.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so na veliko večino odobritev za plačila znova pomembno vplivale napake pri zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij.
The Court found that the vast majority of the payments' budget was again materially affected by errors of legality and regularity in the underlying transactions.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da je pri veliki večini proračuna za plačila prišlo do pomembnih napak pri zakonitosti in pravilnosti z izkazi povezanih transakcij.
The Court found that while Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia have closed the reactors in line with their commitment, and important milestones have been achieved in decommissioning, the main process is still ahead and its finalisation faces a significant funding shortfall (around 2,5 billion euro).
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so Bolgarija, Litva in Slovaška v skladu s svojo zavezo sicer zaustavile reaktorje in da so bili pri razgradnji doseženi pomembni mejniki, vendar je glavnina postopka še pred njimi in sredstev za njegovo dokončanje je odločno premalo (okoli 2,5 milijarde EUR).
The Court found that, in particular in cohesion policy and agriculture, the overall estimated level of error for payments has further declined from 4.4% in 2014 to 3.8% in 2015.
Ugotovilo je, da se je zlasti na področju kohezijske politike in kmetijstva skupna ocenjena stopnja napake pri plačilih še zmanjšala s 4,4 % v letu 2014 na 3,8 % v letu 2015.
The Court found that:
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da:
The Court found the exemption to the unisex rule in Article 5(2) incompatible with the purpose of the Directive as laid down in Article 5(1) and, therefore, with the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Po mnenju Sodišča je izjema od pravila o enakih pogojih za oba spola v členu 5(2) nezdružljiva z namenom Direktive, določenim v členu 5(1), in zato tudi z Listino EU o temeljnih pravicah.
The Court found the exemption to the unisex rule in Article 5(2) was incompatible with the purpose of the Directive and, therefore, with the EU's Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Po mnenju Sodišča je izjema od pravila o enakih pogojih za oba spola v členu 5(2) nezdružljiva z namenom Direktive in zato tudi z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
The Court found the two biggest groups of policy areas - Agriculture and natural resources and Cohesion, energy and transport - to be materially affected by error with partially effective systems.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da na največji skupini področij politik - kmetijstvo in naravni viri ter kohezija, energetika in promet – pomembno vpliva napaka, sistemi pa so delno uspešni.
The Court found weaknesses within Member State authorities relating to the checks carried out under shared management in agriculture and cohesion policies.
Sodišče je odkrilo slabosti v organih držav članic, ki so povezane s pregledi, izvedenimi v okviru deljenega upravljanja na področjih kmetijske in kohezijske politike.
The Court frequently carries out on-the-spot checks.
Sodišče pogosto izvaja preglede na kraju samem.
The Court frequently carries out on-the-spot checks.
Svet pogosto izvaja preglede na kraju samem.