natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Next year, the Commission will evaluate the EU's overarching Drugs Strategy 2005-2012 and its two Drugs Action Plans.
Naslednje leto bo Komisija ocenila krovno strategijo EU na področju drog za obdobje 2005–2012 in svoja akcijska načrta za boj proti drogam.
Next year, the price will fall further to 50 cents per MB.
Naslednje leto bodo cene nadalje padle na 50 centov na megabajt.
Next year’s elections to the European Parliament should be about European issues, and not about if the Greek or any other people have problems with their national government.
Osrednja tema volitev v Evropski parlament prihodnje leto bi morala biti evropska vprašanja in ne težave, ki jih imajo Grki ali kateri koli drug narod s svojo vlado.
Next year’s TEN-T conference will take place in Zaragoza (Spain) in June.
Naslednje leto bo konferenca TEN-T potekala junija v Zaragozi v Španiji.
Next, Advocate General Jääskinen proposes that the Court should uphold the Commission’s complaint alleging the absence of measures encouraging managers to reduce the costs for the provision of the infrastructure and the level of access charges.
V nadaljevanju N. Jääskinen Sodišču predlaga, naj sprejme očitek Komisije, da ne obstajajo ukrepi, ki bi spodbujali upravljavca infrastrukture, da znižuje stroške zagotavljanja infrastrukture in višino uporabnin za dostop.
Next, as regards the criteria for assessing whether a contract can indeed continue to exist without the unfair terms, the Court observes that an objective approach must be applied,
Glede meril, ki omogočajo presojo, ali pogodba lahko naprej dejansko obstaja brez nepoštenih pogojev, Sodišče nato poudarja, da je treba uporabiti nepristranski pristop,
Next, as regards the delimitation of the jurisdiction of the national authorities and of the Union in the area of cartels, the Court recalls that, in accordance with Regulation No 1/2003, jurisdiction to apply EU competition rules is shared between the Commission and the competition authorities of the Member States.
Dalje, glede razmejitve pristojnosti nacionalnih organov in Unije na področju omejevalnih sporazumov je Sodišče opozorilo, da je v skladu z Uredbo št.
Next, as regards the export contract stamping mechanism, the Court rejects the Commission’s argument that the fact that the Chinese Chamber of Commerce was able to refuse to stamp export contracts if the reference price was not complied with is prima facie evidence of State interference in setting prices.
Dalje je Sodišče v zvezi z mehanizmom žigosanja izvoznih pogodb zavrnilo trditev Komisije, da okoliščina, da je Kitajska gospodarska zbornica smela zavrniti ožigosanje izvoznih pogodb, če ne bi bile upoštevane referenčne cene, pomeni zadosten prima facie dokaz o vmešavanju v določanje cen.
Next, as regards the question whether a Member State is, under Community law,
Nadalje, Sodišče glede vprašanja, ali lahko država članica na podlagi prava Skupnosti upravičenost do takega nadomestila pogojuje z dejanskim bivališčem v zadevni državi članici,
Next, if the Commission considers that an excessive deficit exists or may occur, it addresses and opinion to the Member State under Article 126(5) and informs the Council.
Če Komisija meni, da čezmerni primanjkljaj obstaja ali bi do njega lahko prišlo, državi članici naslovi mnenje po členu 126(5) in o tem obvesti Svet.
Next, in order to acquire a right of residence for a period of more than three months, it is necessary to satisfy certain conditions.
Nato za pridobitev pravice do prebivanja več kot tri mesece določa nekatere pogoje.
Next, in relation to the concerns expressed by certain Member States in relation to the alleged negative consequences of such an autonomous interpretation of the regulation, the Court responds that the easing of border crossing is intended for bona fide border residents with legitimate and duly substantiated reasons for frequently crossing an external land border.
Dalje, Sodišče glede zaskrbljenosti, ki so jo izrazile nekatere države članice v zvezi z domnevnimi negativnimi posledicami samostojne razlage Uredbe, odgovarja, da je namen lažjega prehoda meje, da se dobrovernim obmejnim prebivalcem, ki imajo ustrezno utemeljene legitimne razloge, omogoči pogosto prehajanje zunanje kopenske meje.
Next, it finds that, as regards the freedom of establishment, such legislation, by restricting the ability to form CAF to certain bodies meeting strict conditions and to some of those bodies with their registered office in Italy, is likely to make more difficult, or even completely prevent, the exercise by economic operators from other Member States of their right to establish themselves in Italy with the aim of providing the services in question.
Nato ugotavlja, da lahko glede na pravila o svobodi ustanavljanja zakonodaja, ki omejuje možnost ustanavljanja CDP na določene organe, ki izpolnjujejo stroga merila, in na določene od teh organov, ki imajo sedež v Italiji, gospodarskim subjektom iz drugih držav članic oteži ali popolnoma onemogoči izvrševanje njihove pravice, da ustanovijo sedež v Italiji zaradi ponujanja zadevnih storitev.
Next, it states that freedom of establishment grants to Community nationals the right for companies formed in accordance with the law of a Member State to exercise their activity in the Member State concerned through, inter alia, a subsidiary.
zajema da imajo družbe, ustanovljene v skladu z zakonodajo države članice, pravico opravljati dejavnost v zadevni državi članici prek odvisne družbe, podružnice ali agencije.
Next, regarding the principle of imposing a lump sum, the Court states that that principle is essentially based on the assessment of the effects on public and private interests of the failure of the Member State concerned to comply with its obligations, in particular where the breach has persisted for a long period after the judgment initially establishing it was delivered.
Dalje, Sodišče v zvezi načelom naložitve plačila pavšalnega zneska opozarja, da to načelo v bistvu temelji na presoji posledic neizpolnitve obveznosti zadevne države članice za zasebne in javne interese, zlasti če se je neizpolnitev obveznosti nadaljevala dlje časa po sodbi, s katero je bila prvotno ugotovljena.
Next, the Advocate General considers whether, and if so on what conditions, the directive allows a Member State, in order to cope with a ‘systemic abuse of rights’ when residence cards are issued, to require the prior issue of an entry visa, when that general, precautionary obligation does not depend on the previous finding of an abuse of rights in a specific case.
Generalni pravobranilec je na drugem mestu proučil, ali in pod kakšnimi pogoji Direktiva državi članici omogoča, da zaradi soočanja s „sistemsko zlorabo pravic“ pri izdajanju dovoljenj za prebivanje zahteva predhodno izdajo vstopnega vizuma, če taka splošna in preventivna obveznost ne temelji na tem, da je bila prej ugotovljena konkretna zloraba pravice.
Next, the Advocate General examines the Commission’s complaint concerning the levying of charges for the access to railway infrastructure.
V nadaljevanju generalni pravobranilec obravnava očitek Komisije glede določitve uporabnin za dostop do železniške infrastrukture.
Next, the Advocate General points out that the length of the plenary sessions is not expressly defined in the Treaties or the Protocols or by the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament.
Generalni pravobranilec nato opozarja, da trajanje plenarnih zasedanj ni izrecno določeno niti v Pogodbah, niti v Protokolih, niti v Poslovniku Parlamenta.
Next, the Commission claims that Slovenia has not made provision for measures encouraging managers to reduce the costs for the provision of infrastructure and the level of access charges, nor has it implemented the performance scheme for railway undertakings and the infrastructure manager which corresponds to the requirements of EU law.
Dalje, Komisija je zatrjevala, da Slovenija ni sprejela ukrepov za spodbujanje upravljavca infrastrukture, da zniža stroške zagotavljanja infrastrukture in višino uporabnin za dostop, niti ni vzpostavila načrta izvedbe za prevoznike v železniškem prometu in upravljavca infrastrukture, ki bi bil v skladu z zahtevami prava Unije.
Next, the Court examines possible justification for that difference in treatment.
Sodišče je preizkusilo, ali je morebiti tako različno obravnavanje upravičeno.
Next, the Court finds that Mr Iida cannot claim a right of residence as a family member of an EU citizen on the basis of Directive 2004/38.
Zatem je Sodišče ugotovilo, da se Y. Iida ne more sklicevati na pravico do prebivanja družinskega člana državljana Unije na podlagi Direktive 2004/38.
Next, the Court finds that that restriction cannot be justified by overriding reasons and, in particular, by the supposed existence of a risk that the financial balance of the social security system would be seriously undermined.
Nato je Sodišče menilo, da te omejitve ni mogoče upravičiti z nujnimi razlogi, in zlasti ne z domnevno nevarnostjo resne škode za finančno ravnovesje sistema socialne varnosti.
Next, the Court finds that the contested measures are appropriate for attaining the aim of protecting against the fraudulent use of passports, by significantly reducing the likelihood that, owing to an error, unauthorised persons will be allowed to enter the EU.
Dalje, Sodišče ugotavlja, da se lahko z izpodbijanimi ukrepi doseže cilj zaščite potnih listov pred zlorabo, in sicer z znatnim znižanjem tveganja, da bi se nepooblaščenim osebam napačno dovolil vstop na ozemlje Unije.
Next, the Court holds in essence that by rejecting the NAP on the basis of reasoning which consists only in the evocation of doubts as to the reliability of the data used by Estonia and Poland, the Commission erred in law.
Dalje, Sodišče prve stopnje v bistvu meni, da je Komisija, s tem da je zavrnila nacionalni načrt na osnovi takšnega sklepanja, ki temelji le na izraženih dvomih o zanesljivosti podatkov, ki sta jih uporabili Estonija in Poljska, napačno uporabila pravo.
Next, the Court holds that that obligation is also compatible with the principle of legal certainty according to which passengers and air carriers must know precisely the respective scope of their rights and obligations.
Dalje je sodišče presodilo, da je navedena obveznost skladna tudi z načelom pravne varnosti, po katerem morajo potniki in letalski prevozniki natančno poznati obseg svojih pravic in obveznosti.
Next, the Court holds that the collective agreement, which provides for paid leave and a bonus for employees who marry whereas marriage is not possible for persons of the same sex, gives rise to direct discrimination based on sexual orientation against homosexual employees in a PACS arrangement.
Nato je Sodišče presodilo, da kolektivna pogodba, ki plačan dopust in dodatek dodeljuje zaposlenim, ki sklenejo zakonsko zvezo, medtem ko med osebami istega spola zakonska zveza ni dovoljena, ustvarja neposredno diskriminacijo zaradi spolne usmerjenosti zoper istospolno usmerjene zaposlene, ki so sklenili PACS.
Next, the Court holds that the concept of public policy within the meaning of the 1964 Directive does not correspond to that in the CISA.
Sodišče tudi ugotavlja, da pojem javni red v smislu Direktive iz leta 1964 ne ustreza temu iz KISS.
Next, the Court holds that, although under the framework agreement it is left to the Member States to define when contracts are ‘successive’, the discretion of the Member States is not unlimited, because it cannot in any event go so far as to compromise the objective or the practical effect of the framework agreement.
Sodišče nato meni, da čeprav naj bi bila opredelitev lastnosti „zaporednih“ pogodb o zaposlitvi v skladu z okvirnim sporazumom prepuščena državam članicam, pa njihova možnost prostego urejanja ni brez omejitev, ker v nobenem primeru ne sme ogroziti cilja ali polnega učinka okvirnega sporazuma.
Next, the Court noted that Article 81 EC produces direct effects in relations between individuals.
Nadalje, Sodišče opozarja, da člen 81 ES ustvarja neposredne učinke v odnosih med posamezniki.
Next, the Court notes that fiscal legislation is an important and effective instrument for discouraging consumption of tobacco products and, therefore, for the protection of public health.
Nato Sodišče poudari, da pomeni davčna zakonodaja pomembno in učinkovito orodje boja zoper porabo teh proizvodov in torej varovanje javnega zdravja.
Next, the Court notes that not all the matches in the final stage of the World Cup and the EURO are of equal importance for the general public, which tends to attach particular importance to decisive matches between the best teams – such as the final and semi‑finals – and those involving the national team.
Dalje je Sodišče navedlo, da vse tekme končnice Svetovnega prvenstva in EURA niso enako pomembne za javnost, saj je posebna pozornost namenjena odločilnim tekmam boljših ekip – kot sta finale ali polfinale – in tistim tekmam, v katerih nastopa državna reprezentanca.
Next, the Court notes that the agreements link two activities which are in principle independent, namely car repair services and car insurance brokerage.
Sodišče v nadaljevanju ugotavlja, da obravnavani sporazumi povezujejo dve načeloma neodvisni dejavnosti, in sicer storitve popravila vozil in storitve zastopstva za avtomobilska zavarovanja.
Next, the Court observes that EU law does not govern the relations between the ECHR and the legal systems of the Member States, nor does it determine the conclusions to be drawn by a national court in the event of conflict between the rights guaranteed by that convention and a rule of national law.
Sodišče dalje poudarja, da pravo Unije ne ureja razmerij med EKČP in pravnimi redi držav članic niti ne določa posledic, ki jih mora iz tega izpeljati nacionalno sodišče, kadar je podano nasprotje med nacionalnim pravnim pravilom in pravicami, ki jih zagotavlja ta konvencija.
Next, the Court observes that the legislation on games of chance is one of the areas in which there are significant moral, religious and cultural differences between the Member States and that, in the absence of Community harmonisation in the field, it is for each Member State to determine in those areas, in accordance with its own scale of values, what is required in order to ensure that the interests in question are protected.
Sodišče nato opozarja, da je ureditev iger na srečo del področij, na katerih obstajajo precejšnje moralne, verske in kulturne razlike med državami članicami, in ker to področje ni usklajeno na ravni Skupnosti, mora vsaka država članica na podlagi lastne lestvice vrednot presojati zahteve za varstvo zadevnih interesov.
Next, the Court observes that the provision of Austrian law constitutes an impediment to the free movement of goods.
Sodišče nadalje ugotavlja, da avstrijska določba ovira prosti pretok blaga.
Next, the Court observes that the rules on conflict of jurisdiction in international agreements concluded by Member States or by the Community with non-member States necessarily establish criteria of jurisdiction not only in non-member States but also in the Member States, and consequently cover matters governed by the regulation.
V nadaljevanju Sodišče ugotavlja, da pravila za izogibanje sporom o pristojnosti, vsebovana v sporazumih, ki jih država članica oziroma Skupnost sklene s tretjimi državami, nujno postavljajo merila o pristojnosti sodišč ne samo tretjim državam, pač pa tudi državam članicam in tako zadevajo z Uredbo urejena področja.
Next, the Court points out that personal injuries, in respect of which cover is compulsory under the Second Directive, includes any type of damage resulting from an injury to physical integrity, including both physical and psychological suffering.
Dalje je Sodišče pojasnilo, da pojem telesnih poškodb, katerih kritje je obvezno na podlagi Druge direktive, zajema kakršno koli škodo, ki izvira iz posega v osebno celovitost, kar vključuje tako telesno kot duševno trpljenje.
Next, the Court points out that the conditions laid down for the registration of vessels must not form an obstacle to freedom of establishment.
V nadaljevanju Sodišče opozarja, da pogoji za registracijo ladij ne smejo ovirati svobode ustanavljanja.
Next, the Court points out that, in the present case, such registration is not in itself sufficient to meet the obligation to comply with the 2002 judgment.
Sodišče nato poudarja, da v obravnavanem primeru zgolj tak vpis ne zadostuje za izpolnitev obveznosti izvršitve sodbe iz leta 2002.
Next, the Court points out that, under EU law as it currently stands, the conditions applicable to the supply of medicinal products to the public are not harmonised and, consequently, the regime applicable to the retail supply of medicinal products varies from one Member State to another.
Sodišče nato opozarja, da pogoji za izdajanje zdravil javnosti na ravni Unije trenutno še niso usklajeni in da se zato sistem prometa z zdravili na drobno med državami članicami razlikuje.
Next, the Court recalls, first, that a finding of discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation requires that the situations in question be comparable in a specific and concrete manner in the light of the benefit concerned.
Potem je opozorilo, prvič, da morata biti za ugotovitev diskriminacije zaradi spolne usmerjenosti obravnavana položaja primerljiva, in sicer konkretno in specifično glede na zadevno dajatev.
Next, the Court refers to its case-law according to which passengers whose flights are subject to long delay – that is delay equal to or in excess of three hours – are entitled to compensation, like those passengers whose original flights have been cancelled and whom an air carrier is not able to offer re-routing in accordance with the conditions laid down in the regulation, given that they suffer an irreversible loss of time and, hence, a comparable inconvenience (Sturgeon and Others, Nelson and Others).
Sodišče nato navaja svojo sodno prakso, v skladu s katero imajo potniki, katerih let je imel veliko zamudo, to je najmanj tri ure, tako kot potniki, katerih začetni let je bil odpovedan in ki jim letalski prevoznik ni bil sposoben zagotoviti spremembe poti, pod pogoji, ki so določeni v navedeni uredbi, pravico do odškodnine, ker so utrpeli nenadomestljivo izgubo časa in torej podobne nevšečnosti (sodbi Sturgeon, Nelson).
Next, the Court rejects the argument of Cisco and Messagenet that, as a result of that concentration, Microsoft would be able to reserve to its product on the enterprise communications market, Lync, preferential interoperability with Skype and with Skype’s large user base, to the detriment of its competitors.
Splošno sodišče je nato zavrnilo argument družb Cisco in Messagenet, da bi lahko družba Microsoft zaradi te koncentracije za svoj proizvod na trgu poslovnih komunikacij, program Lync, zadržala prednostno povezljivost s programom Skype in njegovo veliko bazo uporabnikov, in to v škodo njegovih konkurentov.
Next, the Court states that the admissibility rules relating to actions brought against legislative acts, and in particular the content of the condition of individual concern, were not altered by the Treaty of Lisbon.
Sodišče je nato pojasnilo, da Lizbonska pogodba ni spremenila pravil o dopustnosti tožb, vloženih zoper zakonodajne akte, in sicer zlasti pogoja posamičnega nanašanja.
Next, the Court states that the list of prohibited articles does not fall within any of the categories of measures and information which are treated as secret and which are not published under Regulation 2320/2002.
Dalje, Sodišče ugotavlja, da seznam prepovedanih predmetov ne spada v nobeno od kategorij ukrepov in informacij, ki so opredeljeni kot zaupni in se v skladu z Uredbo 2320/2002 ne objavijo (58).
Next, the Court states that the objective of guaranteeing adequate investment in the electricity and gas distribution systems is designed to ensure, inter alia, security of energy supply, an objective which it has also recognised as being an overriding reason in the public interest.
Sodišče tudi navaja, da je cilj zagotavljanja zadostnega investiranja v omrežja za distribucijo električne energije in plina zlasti zagotoviti zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo, za ta cilj pa je Sodišče prav tako priznalo, da je nujni razlog v splošnem interesu.
Next, the Court states that the purpose of the IPPC Directive, namely to ensure pollution prevention and control, could not be attained if it were impossible to prevent an installation which may have benefited from a permit awarded in infringement of that directive from continuing to function pending a definitive decision as to the lawfulness of that permit.
Sodišče zatem ugotavlja, da cilja preprečevanja in nadzorovanja onesnaževanja okolja ne bi bilo mogoče doseči, če bi bilo nemogoče preprečiti, da obrat, ki mu je bilo soglasje odobreno ob kršitvi te direktive, še naprej deluje do sprejetja dokončne odločitve o zakonitosti tega soglasja.
Next, the Court states that the regulation does not provide for any limitation, either temporal or monetary, of the obligation to provide care to passengers whose flight is cancelled due to extraordinary circumstances.
Dalje je Sodišče pojasnilo, da Uredba ne določa nobene časovne ali denarne omejitve obveznosti oskrbe potnikov, katerih let je bil odpovedan zaradi izrednih razmer.
Next, the discharge of obligations pursuant to the regulation is without prejudice to air carriers’ rights to seek compensation from any person who caused the delay, including third parties (Nelson and Others).
Dalje, izpolnitev obveznosti na podlagi navedene uredbe ne vpliva na pravico letalskega prevoznika, da zahteva odškodnino od katere koli osebe, ki je povzročila zamudo, vključno s tretjimi osebami (sodba Nelson in drugi).
Next, the General Court observes that the concepts of ‘public policy’ and ‘accepted principles of morality’ must be interpreted not only with reference to the circumstances common to all Member States but by taking into account the particular circumstances of individual Member States which are likely to influence the perception of the relevant public within those States.
Splošno sodišče nato poudarja, da je treba pojma „javni red“ in „sprejeta moralna načela“ razlagati tako, da se ne upoštevajo le okoliščine, ki so skupne državam članice Unije, ampak tudi posebne okoliščine posameznih držav članic, ki lahko vplivajo na zaznavo upoštevne javnosti, ki je na tem ozemlju.
Next, the Portuguese court will have to examine the conditions governing access to the market in question for bodies other than the OTOC, in order to establish whether equality of opportunity is guaranteed as between the various economic operators.
Portugalsko sodišče mora nato preizkusiti pogoje za dostop izvajalcev, ki niso OTOC, do zadevnega trga, da bi ugotovilo, ali so različnim gospodarskim subjektom zagotovljene enake možnosti.
Next, we will approve our conclusions, including the external relations aspects.
Zatem bomo potrdili naše tokratne sklepe, vključno z zunanjepolitičnimi zadevami.
Next, with regard to passenger vehicles previously registered in another Member State with the driver’s seat on the right-hand side, the Court considers that the contested legislation constitutes measures having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports, such measures being prohibited by the Treaty.
Nato je Sodišče v zvezi z osebnimi vozili, ki so bila prej registrirana v drugi državi članici in imajo vozniški prostor na desni, štelo, da so sporni predpisi ukrep z enakim učinkom, kot ga imajo količinske omejitve pri uvozu, ki so prepovedane s Pogodbo.
Next, with regard to the right to compensation, provided for by the regulation for passengers whose flight has been cancelled, the Court holds that passengers who are affected by a delay sustain similar damage, consisting in a loss of time, and thus are in a comparable situation.
Nato je Sodišče glede pravice do odškodnine, ki jo navedena uredba določa v korist potnikov, katerih let je odpovedan, ugotovilo, da potnikom, katerih let ima zamudo, nastane podobna škoda, ki jo predstavlja izguba časa, in da so zato v primerljivem položaju.
NGA optical fibre-based networks enable bitrates several times higher than those currently available on traditional copper wire networks.
Omrežja NGA iz optičnih vlaken omogočajo nekajkrat višje bitne hitrosti od tradicionalnih omrežij iz bakrene žice, ki so zdaj na voljo.