natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
).  
Besedilo navedene pravice v prvih dveh odstavkih izhaja iz sodne prakse (sodba Sodišča z dne 15. oktobra 1987 v zadevi 222/86 Heylens [1987] PSES 4097, odstavek 15 obrazložitve, sodba z dne 18. oktobra 1989 v zadevi 374/87 Orkem [1989] PSES 3283, sodba z dne 21. novembra 1991 v zadevi C-269/90 TU München [1991] PSES I-5469, in sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 6. decembra 1994 v zadevi T-450/93 Lisrestal [1994] PSES II-1177, z dne 18. septembra 1995 v zadevi T-167/94 Nölle [1995] PSES II-258) in besedilo glede obveznosti navedbe razlogov izhaja iz člena 253 Pogodbe ES, ki se sedaj nadomesti z drugim odstavkom I-38. člena Ustave (prim. tudi pravno podlago v III-398. členu za sprejetje zakonodajnih aktov za odprto, učinkovito in neodvisno evropsko upravo).
The right guaranteed in this Article has been taken over from Article 255 of the EC Treaty, on the basis of which Regulation 1049/2001 has subsequently been adopted.  
) je treba navedene pravice uporabljati pod pogoji in v mejah, določenih s III. delom Ustave.
), the right of access to documents is exercised under the conditions and within the limits for which provision is made in Articles I-50(3) and III-399.  
Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, ki je pomemben vidik tega vprašanja, je zagotovljena s členom47 Listine(
Right to petition  
Pravica dostopa do dokumentov
Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to petition the European Parliament.  
Vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic ima pravico dostopa do dokumentov institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije ne glede na nosilec dokumenta.
The right guaranteed in this Article is the right guaranteed by Articles I-10 and III-334 of the Constitution.  
Evropska konvencija je to pravico razširila na dokumente institucij, organov in agencij v splošnem, ne glede na njihovo obliko (glej tretji odstavek I-50. člena Ustave).
In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter(  
V skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 52 Listine(
59  
64
), it applies under the conditions defined in these two Articles.  
) se pravica dostopa do dokumentov uresničuje pod pogoji in omejitvami, iz tretjega odstavka I-50. člena in III-399. člena.
Freedom of movement and of residence  
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic
Freedom of movement and residence may be granted, in accordance with the Constitution, to nationals of third countries legally resident in the territory of a Member State.  
Vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic ima pravico, da se obrne na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij Unije, razen glede Sodišča Evropske unije pri opravljanju njegove sodne funkcije.
The right guaranteed by paragraph 1 is the right guaranteed by Article I-10(2)(a) of the Constitution (cf. also the legal base in Article III-125; and the judgement of the Court of Justice of 17 September 2002, C-413/99 Baumbast, [2002] ECR 709).  
Pravica, zagotovljena s tem členom, je pravica, zagotovljena s I-10. členom in III-335. členom Ustave.
Consequently, the granting of this right depends on the institutions exercising that power.  
) se uporablja pod pogoji iz teh dveh členov.
Diplomatic and consular protection  
Pravica do peticije
Every citizen of the Union shall, in the territory of a third country in which the Member State of which he or she is a national is not represented, be entitled to protection by the diplomatic or consular authorities of any Member State, on the same conditions as the nationals of that Member State.  
Vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic ima pravico nasloviti peticijo na Evropski parlament.
The right guaranteed by this Article is the right guaranteed by Article I-10 of the Constitution; cf. also the legal base in Article III-127.  
Pravica, zagotovljena s tem členom, je pravica, zagotovljena s I-10. in III-334. členom Ustave.
In accordance with Article 52(2) of the Charter(  
64
), it applies under the conditions defined in these Articles.  
Svoboda gibanja in prebivanja
TITLE VI  
Pojasnilo
JUSTICE  
64
Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial  
Pravica, zagotovljena s tem členom, je pravica, zagotovljena z I-10. členom Ustave (prim. tudi pravno podlago v III-127. členu Ustave).
Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.  
Pravica do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva in nepristranskega sodišča
Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law.  
Vsakdo, ki so mu kršene pravice in svoboščine, zagotovljene s pravom Unije, ima pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva pred sodiščem v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v tem členu.
Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented.  
Vsakdo ima pravico, da o njegovi zadevi pravično in javno ter v razumnem roku odloča neodvisno, nepristransko in z zakonom predhodno ustanovljeno sodišče.
The first paragraph is based on Article 13 of the ECHR:  
Prvi odstavek temelji na 13. členu EKČP:
&#x2018; Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity. &#x2019;  
&#x201E; Vsakdo, čigar pravice in svoboščine, zajamčene s to Konvencijo, so kršene, ima pravico do učinkovitih pravnih sredstev pred domačimi oblastmi, in to tudi če je kršitev storila uradna oseba pri opravljanju uradne dolžnosti. &#x201C;
However, in Union law the protection is more extensive since it guarantees the right to an effective remedy before a court.  
Vendar pa je varstvo v okviru prava Unije širše, saj zagotavlja pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva pred sodiščem.
The Court of Justice enshrined that right in its judgment of 15 May 1986 as a general principle of Union law (Case 222/84 Johnston [1986] ECR 1651; see also judgment of 15 October 1987, Case 222/86 Heylens [1987] ECR 4097 and judgment of 3 December 1992, Case C-97/91 Borelli [1992] ECR I-6313).  
Sodišče je v svoji sodbi z dne 15. maja 1986 navedeno pravico utemeljilo kot splošno načelo prava Unije (zadeva 222/84 Johnston [1986] PSES 1651; glej tudi sodbo z dne 15. oktobra 1987, zadeva 222/86 Heylens [1987] PSES 4097in sodbo z dne 3. decembra 1992, zadeva C-97/91 Borelli [1992] PSES I-6313).
According to the Court, that general principle of Union law also applies to the Member States when they are implementing Union law.  
Po mnenju Sodišča se navedeno splošno načelo prava Unije uporablja tudi za države članice pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije.
The inclusion of this precedent in the Charter has not been intended to change the system of judicial review laid down by the Treaties, and particularly the rules relating to admissibility for direct actions before the Court of Justice of the European Union.  
Vključitev te sodne prakse v Listino ni bila namenjena spremembi sistema sodnega nadzora, določenega v pogodbah, zlasti ne pravil o dopustnosti neposrednih tožb pred Sodiščem Evropske unije.
The European Convention has considered the Union's system of judicial review including the rules on admissibility, and confirmed them while amending them as to certain aspects, as reflected in Articles III-353 to III-381 of the Constitution, and in particular in Article III-365(4).  
Evropska konvencija je preučila sistem sodnega nadzora Unije, vključno s pravili o dopustnosti, ter ga potrdila in hkrati spremenila nekatere njegove vidike, kot je prikazano v III-353. do III-381. členu Ustave, in zlasti v četrtem odstavku III-365. člena Ustave.
Article 47(  
Člen 47(
70  
72
) applies to the institutions of the Union and of Member States when they are implementing Union law and does so for all rights guaranteed by Union law.  
) se uporablja za institucije Unije in države članice pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije in velja za vse pravice, zagotovljene s pravom Unije.
The second paragraph corresponds to Article 6(1) of the ECHR which reads as follows:  
Drugi odstavek ustreza prvemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP, ki se glasi:
&#x2018; In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.  
&#x201E; Vsakdo ima pravico, da o njegovih civilnih pravicah in obveznostih ali o kakršnihkoli kazenskih obtožbah zoper njega pravično in javno ter v razumnem roku odloča neodvisno in nepristransko z zakonom ustanovljeno sodišče.
Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. &#x2019;  
Sodba mora biti izrečena javno, toda tisk in javnost sta lahko izločena iz sojenja deloma ali v celoti v interesu morale, javnega reda ali državne varnosti, če to v demokratični družbi zahtevajo koristi mladoletnikov ali varovanje zasebnega življenja strank, pa tudi tedaj, kadar bi po mnenju sodišča zaradi posebnih okoliščin javnost sojenja škodovala interesom pravičnosti. &#x201C;
In Union law, the right to a fair hearing is not confined to disputes relating to civil law rights and obligations.  
V pravu Unije pravica do poštene obravnave ni omejena na spore, ki se nanašajo na pravice in obveznosti civilnega prava.
That is one of the consequences of the fact that the Union is a community based on the rule of law as stated by the Court in Case 294/83, &#x2018; Les Verts &#x2019; v European Parliament (judgment of 23 April 1986, [1988] ECR 1339).  
To je ena od posledic dejstva, da je Unija skupnost, ki temelji na načelih pravne države, kot navaja Sodišče v zadevi 294/83, &#x201E; Les Verts &#x201C; proti Evropskemu parlamentu (sodba z dne 23. aprila 1986, [1988] PSES 1339).
Nevertheless, in all respects other than their scope, the guarantees afforded by the ECHR apply in a similar way to the Union.  
Kljub temu se jamstva, zagotovljena z EKČP, v vseh pogledih, razen glede njihovega področja uporabe, uporabljajo na podoben način za Unijo.
With regard to the third paragraph, it should be noted that in accordance with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, provision should be made for legal aid where the absence of such aid would make it impossible to ensure an effective remedy (ECHR Judgment of 9 October 1979, Airey, Series A, Volume 32, 11).  
V zvezi s tretjim odstavkom je treba opozoriti na dejstvo, da je v skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice potrebno poskrbeti za pravno pomoč, če bi bilo v primeru, da takšne pomoči ni, nemogoče zagotoviti učinkovito pravno sredstvo (sodba EKČP z dne 9.
There is also a system of legal assistance for cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union.  
Obstaja tudi sistem pravne pomoči za zadeve, ki so na Sodišču Evropske unije.
71  
73
Everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.  
Obdolženec velja za nedolžnega, dokler njegova krivda ni dokazana v skladu z zakonom.
Respect for the rights of the defence of anyone who has been charged shall be guaranteed.  
Vsakemu obdolžencu je zagotovljena pravica do obrambe.
Article 48(  
Člen 48(
) is the same as Article 6(2) and (3) of the ECHR, which reads as follows:  
) je enak drugemu in tretjemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP, ki se glasi:
Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.  
Kdor je obdolžen kaznivega dejanja, velja za nedolžnega, dokler ni v skladu z zakonom dokazana njegova krivda.
Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:  
Kdor je obdolžen kaznivega dejanja, ima naslednje minimalne pravice:
to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;  
da ga takoj in nadrobno seznanijo v jeziku, ki ga razume, z bistvom in vzroki obtožbe, ki ga bremeni;
to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;  
da ima primeren čas in možnosti za pripravo svoje obrambe;
to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;  
da se brani sam ali z zagovornikom po lastni izbiri ali če nima dovolj sredstev za plačilo zagovornika, da ga dobi brezplačno, če to zahtevajo interesi pravičnosti;
to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;  
da zaslišuje oziroma zahteva zaslišanje obremenilnih prič in da doseže navzočnost in zaslišanje razbremenilnih prič ob enakih pogojih, kot veljajo za obremenilne priče;
to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court. &#x2019;  
da ima brezplačno pomoč tolmača, če ne razume ali ne govori jezika, ki se uporablja pred sodiščem &#x201C; .
In accordance with Article 52(3)(  
V skladu s tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine(
72  
74
), this right has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR.  
) ima ta pravica enak pomen in področje uporabe kot pravica, zagotovljena z EKČP.
73  
75
No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national law or international law at the time when it was committed.  
Nihče ne sme biti obsojen zaradi storitve ali opustitve za katero v času, ko je bila storjena, nacionalno ali mednarodno pravo ni določalo, da je kazniva.
Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than that which was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.  
Prav tako se mu ne sme izreči težja kazen od tiste, ki je bila zagrožena v času storitve dejanja.
If, subsequent to the commission of a criminal offence, the law provides for a lighter penalty, that penalty shall be applicable.2.  
Če je bilo v času po storitvi dejanja z zakonom predpisana milejša kazen, se uporabi ta.2.
This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles recognised by the community of nations.  
Ta člen ne izključuje sojenja in kaznovanja osebe zaradi storitve ali opustitve, ki je bilo v času, ko je bila storjena, kazniva po splošnih načelih, ki jih priznava skupnost narodov.
The severity of penalties must not be disproportionate to the criminal offence.  
Kazen ne sme bit nesorazmerna s kaznivim dejanjem.
This Article follows the traditional rule of the non-retroactivity of laws and criminal sanctions.  
Ta člen upošteva običajno pravilo o prepovedi retroaktivnosti zakonov in kazni.
There has been added the rule of the retroactivity of a more lenient penal law, which exists in a number of Member States and which features in Article 15 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.  
Dodano je bilo pravilo retroaktivnosti milejše kazenskega zakona, ki obstaja v številnih državah članicah in je podano v členu 15 Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah.
Article 7 of the ECHR is worded as follows:  
V 7. členu EKČP je zapisano:
No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed.  
Nihče ne sme biti obsojen za katero koli dejanje, izvršeno s storitvijo ali opustitvijo, ki ni bilo določeno kot kaznivo dejanje po domačem ali po mednarodnem pravu v času, ko je bilo storjeno.
Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.  
Prav tako se ne sme izreči strožja kazen od tiste, ki jo je bilo mogoče izreči v času, ko je bilo kaznivo dejanje storjeno.
This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations. &#x2019;  
Ta člen ni ovira za sojenje in kaznovanje oseb za kako storitev ali opustitev, ki je bila v času, ko je bila storjena, kazniva po splošnih pravnih načelih, ki jih priznavajo civilizirani narodi. &#x201C;
In paragraph 2, the reference to &#x2018; civilised &#x2019; nations has been deleted; this does not change the meaning of this paragraph, which refers to crimes against humanity in particular.  
V drugem odstavku se je črtala beseda &#x201E; civilizirani &#x201C; ; to ne spreminja pomena tega odstavka, ki se nanaša predvsem na zločine zoper človeštvo.
In accordance with Article 52(3)(  
V skladu z tretjim odstavkom člena 52 Listine(
74  
76
), the right guaranteed here therefore has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR.  
) ima tukaj zagotovljena pravica torej enak pomen in področje uporabe kot pravica, zagotovljena z EKČP.
Paragraph 3 states the general principle of proportionality between penalties and criminal offences which is enshrined in the common constitutional traditions of the Member States and in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the Communities.  
Tretji odstavek podaja splošno načelo sorazmernosti kazni in kaznivih dejanj, ki je utemeljeno z ustavnimi tradicijami, skupnimi vsem državam članicam, in s sodno prakso Sodišča Skupnosti.
75  
77
Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the ECHR reads as follows:  
7 k EKČP se glasi:
No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings under the jurisdiction of the same State for an offence for which he has already been finally acquitted or convicted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of that State.  
Pravosodni organi iste države ne smejo nikogar ne kazensko preganjati ne kaznovati za kaznivo dejanje, za katero je bil na podlagi zakona in v skladu s kazenskim postopkom te države s pravnomočno sodbo že oproščen ali obsojen.
The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall not prevent the reopening of the case in accordance with the law and the penal procedure of the State concerned, if there is evidence of new or newly discovered facts, or if there has been a fundamental defect in the previous proceedings, which could affect the outcome of the case.  
Določbe prejšnjega odstavka ne preprečujejo obnove kazenskega postopka na podlagi zakona in skladno s kazenskim postopkom prizadete države, če obstajajo dokazi o novih ali na novo odkritih dejstvih ali pa če je v prejšnjih postopkih prišlo do bistvene napake, ki bi lahko vplivala na izid sojenja.
No derogation from this Article shall be made under Article 15 of the Convention. &#x2019;  
Določila tega člena se ne smejo derogirati s sklicevanjem na 15. člen Konvencije. &#x201C;
Commission [1999] ECR II-931).  
Pravilo &#x201E; non bis in idem &#x201C; se uporablja v pravu Unije (glej med obsežno sodno prakso sodbo z dne 5. maja 1966, zadevi 18/65 in 35/65, Gutmann proti Komisiji [1966] PSES 103 in za novejšo zadevo sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. aprila 1999, združene zadeve T-305/94 in druge, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV proti Komisiji [1999] PSES II-931).
The rule prohibiting cumulation refers to cumulation of two penalties of the same kind, that is to say criminal law penalties.  
Pravilo o prepovedi kumulacije se nanaša na kumulacijo dveh kazni enake vrste, v tem primeru kazni, izrečene na kazenskem sodišču.
In accordance with Article 50(  
V skladu s členom 50(
acquis  
) se pravilo &#x201E; non bis in idem &#x201C; ne uporablja zgolj v okviru pristojnosti ene države, temveč tudi v okviru pristojnosti več držav članic.
in Union law; see Articles 54 to 58 of the Schengen Convention and the judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 February 2003, C-187/01 Gözütok (not yet published), Article 7 of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests and Article 10 of the Convention on the fight against corruption.  
To ustreza pravnemu redu v pravu Unije; glej člene 54 do 58 Schengenske konvencije in sodbo Sodišča z dne 11. februarja 2003, C-187/01 Gözütok, člen 7 Konvencije o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in člen 10 Konvencije o boju proti korupciji.
The very limited exceptions in those Conventions permitting the Member States to derogate from the &#x2018; non bis in idem &#x2019; rule are covered by the horizontal clause in Article 52(1) of the Charter(  
Zelo omejene izjeme v navedenih konvencijah, ki državam članicam omogočajo izjemo od pravila &#x201E; non bis in idem &#x201C; , so določene s horizontalno klavzulo iz prvega odstavka člena 52 Listine(
76  
78
) concerning limitations.  
) glede omejitev.
As regards the situations referred to by Article 4 of Protocol No 7, namely the application of the principle within the same Member State, the guaranteed right has the same meaning and the same scope as the corresponding right in the ECHR.  
7 EKČP, tj. uporabo načela v isti državi članici, ima zagotovljena pravica enak pomen in področje uporabe kot ustrezna pravica v EKČP.
TITLE VII  
NASLOV VII
77  
79
The provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law.  
Določbe te listine se uporabljajo za institucije, organe, urade in agencije Unije ob spoštovanju načela subsidiarnosti, za države članice pa samo, ko izvajajo pravo Unije.
They shall therefore respect the rights, observe the principles and promote the application thereof in accordance with their respective powers and respecting the limits of the powers of the Union as conferred on it in the other Parts of the Constitution.  
Zato spoštujejo pravice, upoštevajo načela in spodbujajo njihovo uporabo v skladu s svojimi pristojnostmi in ob spoštovanju meja pristojnosti Unije, ki so ji dodeljene v drugih delih Ustave.
This Charter does not extend the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union or establish any new power or task for the Union, or modify powers and tasks defined in the other Parts of the Constitution.  
Ta listina ne razširja področja uporabe prava Unije preko pristojnosti Unije in ne ustvarja nikakršnih novih pristojnosti ali nalog Unije, pa tudi ne spreminja pristojnosti in nalog, opredeljenih v drugih delih Ustave.
The aim of Article 51(  
Namen člena 51 Listine(
) is to determine the scope of the Charter.  
) je opredeliti področje uporabe Listine.
It seeks to establish clearly that the Charter applies primarily to the institutions and bodies of the Union, in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.  
Prizadeva si jasno določiti, da se Listina ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti uporablja zlasti za institucije in organe Unije.
This provision was drafted in keeping with Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, which required the Union to respect fundamental rights, and with the mandate issued by Cologne European Council.  
Ta določba je bila sestavljena v skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki od Unije zahteva, da upošteva temeljne pravice, in v skladu z mandatom, podeljenim v okviru Evropskega sveta v Kölnu.
The term &#x2018; institutions &#x2019; is enshrined in Part I of the Constitution.  
Izraz &#x201E; institucije &#x201C; je utemeljen v I. delu Ustave.