natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The provisions of this Charter which contain principles may be implemented by legislative and executive acts taken by institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, and by acts of Member States when they are implementing Union law, in the exercise of their respective powers.
Določbe te listine, v katerih so določena načela, se lahko izvajajo z zakonodajnimi in izvedbenimi akti institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije ter akti držav članic za izvajanje prava Unije v skladu z njihovimi pristojnostmi.
Nothing in this Charter shall be interpreted as restricting or adversely affecting human rights and fundamental freedoms as recognised, in their respective fields of application, by Union law and international law and by international agreements to which the Union or all the Member States are party, including the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and by the Member States' constitutions.
Nobena določba te listine se ne sme razlagati kot omejevanje ali zoževanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ki jih, na njihovem področju uporabe, priznavajo pravo Unije, mednarodno pravo in mednarodni sporazumi, katerih pogodbenica je Unija ali vse države članice, predvsem Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter ustave držav članic.
Nothing in this Charter shall be interpreted as implying any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognised in this Charter or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for herein.
Nobena določba te listine se ne sme razlagati, kot da podeljuje pravico opravljanja kakršnekoli dejavnosti ali storitve kakršnega koli dejanja, katerega cilj bi bil odpraviti pravice in svoboščine, priznane v tej listini, ali jih omejiti bolj, kakor je predvideno v tej listini.
The above text adapts the wording of the Charter proclaimed on 7 December 2000, and will replace it as from the date of entry in to force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Zgornje besedilo s potrebnimi prilagoditvami povzema besedilo Listine, razglašene dne 7. decembra 2000, in jo bo nadomestilo z dnem začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe.
They have been updated under the responsibility of the Praesidium of the European Convention, in the light of the drafting adjustments made to the text of the Charter by that Convention (notably to Articles 51 and 52) and of further developments of Union law.
Ta pojasnila so bila posodobljena pod vodstvom predsedstva Evropske konvencije zaradi prilagoditve besedila Listine s strani omenjene konvencije (zlasti členov 51 in 52) in nadaljnjega razvoja prava Unije.
Although they do not as such have the status of law, they area valuable tool of interpretation intended to clarify the provisions of the Charter.
Čeprav sama nimajo pravne veljave, so dragocena pomoč pri razlagi in pojasnjevanju določb Listine.
The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights enshrined human dignity in its preamble: ‘Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world.’
V Splošni deklaraciji človekovih pravic iz leta 1948 je človekovo dostojanstvo zapisano v preambuli: „Ker pomeni priznanje prirojenega človeškega dostojanstva vseh članov človeške družbe in njihovih enakih in neodtujljivih pravic temelj svobode, pravičnosti in miru na svetu.“ Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 9. oktobra 2001 v zadevi Nizozemska proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, C-377/98, rec. 2001, str. I-7079, točke od 70 do 77, potrdilo, da je temeljna pravica človekovega dostojanstva del prava Unije.
It results that none of the rights laid down in this Charter may be used to harm the dignity of another person, and that the dignity of the human person is part of the substance of the rights laid down in this Charter.
Iz tega izhaja, da se nobena od pravic iz te listine ne sme uporabiti za škodovanje dostojanstvu druge osebe in da je človekovo dostojanstvo ena od bistvenih pravic, določenih v tej listini.
Explanation on Article 2 — Right to life
Pojasnilo k členu 2 – Pravica do življenja
Paragraph 1 of this Article is based on the first sentence of Article 2(1) of the ECHR, which reads as follows:
Odstavek 1 tega člena temelji na prvem stavku prvega odstavka 2. člena Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP), ki se glasi:
Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law …’.
Pravica vsakogar do življenja je zavarovana z zakonom ...“
The second sentence of the provision, which referred to the death penalty, was superseded by the entry in to force of Article 1 of Protocol No 6 to the ECHR, which reads as follows:
Drugi stavek te določbe, ki se nanaša na smrtno kazen, je izgubil pomen z začetkom veljavnosti Protokola št. 6 k EKČP, katerega 1. člen se glasi:
‘The death penalty shall be abolished.
„Smrtna kazen se odpravi.
No-one shall be condemned to such penalty or executed.’
Nihče ne sme biti obsojen na takšno kazen ali usmrčen.“
Article 2(2) of the Charter is based on that provision.
Odstavek 2 člena 2 Listine temelji na tej določbi.
The provisions of Article 2 of the Charter correspond to those of the above Articles of the ECHR and its Protocol.
Določbi člena 2 Listine ustrezata tistim iz zgornjih členov EKČP in njenega dodatnega protokola.
They have the same meaning and the same scope, in accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter.
V skladu s členom 52(3) Listine imata enak pomen in področje uporabe.
Therefore, the ‘negative’ definitions appearing in the ECHR must be regarded as also forming part of the Charter:
Zato je na „negativne“ opredelitve v EKČP prav tako treba gledati kot na sestavni del Listine:
Article 2(2) of the ECHR:
(a) drugi odstavek 2. člena EKČP:
‘Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:
„Kot kršitev tega člena se ne šteje odvzem življenja, če je posledica uporabe nujno potrebne sile:
(a) in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
(a) pri obrambi katerekoli osebe pred nezakonitim nasiljem,
(b) in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained;
(b) pri zakonitem odvzemu prostosti ali pri preprečitvi bega osebi, ki ji je zakonito odvzeta prostost,
Editor's note: References to article numbers in the Treaties have been updated and some minor technical errors have been corrected.
Opomba redaktorja: sklicevanja na oštevilčenje členov Pogodb so posodobljena in popravljene so bile nekatere materialne napake.
(c) in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.’
(c) pri zakonitem dejanju, ki ima namen zadušiti upor ali vstajo.“
(b) Article 2 of Protocol No 6 to the ECHR:
(b) 2. člen Protokola št. 6 k EKČP:
‘A State may make provision in its law for the death penalty in respect of acts committed in time of war or of imminent threat of war; such penalty shall be applied only in the instances laid down in the law and in accordance with its provisions…’.
„Država lahko določi v svoji zakonodaji smrtno kazen za dejanja, storjena med vojno ali ob neposredni vojni nevarnosti; takšna kazen se sme uporabiti le v primerih, ki so določeni v zakonu in v skladu z določbami zakona ...“
In its judgment of 9 October 2001 in Case C-377/98 Netherlands v European Parliament and Council [2001] ECR-I 7079, at grounds 70, 78 to 80, the Court of Justice confirmed that a fundamental right to human integrity is part of Union law and encompasses, in the context of medicine and biology, the free and informed consent of the donor and recipient.
Sodišče je v sodbi z dne 9. oktobra 2001 v zadevi Nizozemska proti Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, C-377/98, 2001, str. I-7079, točke 70 in 78 do 80, potrdilo, da je temeljna pravica človekovega dostojanstva del prava Unije in vključuje, v okviru medicine in biologije, svobodno privolitev po predhodni seznanitvi darovalca in prejemnika.
The principles of Article 3 of the Charter are already included in the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, adopted by the Council of Europe (ETS 164 and additional protocol ETS 168).
Načela iz člena 3 Listine so že vključena v Konvencijo o človekovih pravicah v zvezi z biomedicino, ki jo je sprejel Svet Evrope (ETS 164 in dodatni protokol ETS 168).
The Charter does not set out to depart from those principles, and therefore prohibits only reproductive cloning.
Listina se ne oddaljuje od teh načel in zato prepoveduje le reproduktivno kloniranje.
Thus it does not in any way prevent the legislature from prohibiting other forms of cloning.
Zato zakonodajalcu na noben način ne preprečuje prepovedi drugih oblik kloniranja.
The reference to eugenic practices, in particular those aiming at the selection of persons, relates to possible situations in which selection programmes are organised and implemented, involving campaigns for sterilisation, forced pregnancy, compulsory ethnic marriage among others, all acts deemed to be international crimes in the Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted in Rome on 17 July 1998 (see its Article 7(1)(g)).
Sklicevanje na evgenične postopke, zlasti tiste, katerih cilj je selekcija ljudi, se nanaša na morebitne razmere, v katerih bi se organizirali in izvajali selekcijski programi, ki bi med drugim vključevali sterilizacijske kampanje, prisilne nosečnosti ter obveznost izbire zakonskega partnerja iz iste etnične skupine, kar so vse dejanja, ki se po statutu Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, sprejetem v Rimu 17. julija 1998, štejejo za mednarodna kazniva dejanja (glej točko (g) prvega odstavka 7. člena statuta).
Explanation on Article 4 — Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
Pojasnilo k členu 4 – Prepoved mučenja in nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja
The right in Article 4 is the right guaranteed by Article 3 of the ECHR, which has the same wording: ‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’. By virtue of Article 52(3) of the Charter, it therefore has the same meaning and the same scope as the ECHR Article.
Pravica v členu 4 je pravica, zagotovljena s 3. členom EKČP, ki ima enako besedilo: „Nikogar se ne sme mučiti ali nečloveško in ponižujoče z njim ravnati ali ga kaznovati.“ Zato ima na podlagi člena 52(3) Listine člen 4 enak pomen in področje uporabe kot 3. člen EKČP.
Explanation on Article 5 — Prohibition of slavery and forced labour
Pojasnilo k členu 5 – Prepoved suženjstva in prisilnega dela
The right in Article 5(1) and (2) corresponds to Article 4(1) and (2) of the ECHR, which has the same wording.
Pravica v členu 5(1) in (2) ustreza prvemu in drugemu odstavku 4. člena EKČP, ki ima enako besedilo.
It therefore has the same meaning and scope as the ECHR Article, by virtue of Article 52(3) of the Charter.
Zato ima v skladu s členom 52(3) Listine enak pomen in obseg kot pravica iz 4. člena EKČP.
— no limitation may legitimately affect the right provided for in paragraph 1,
— legitimna omejitev pravice, zagotovljene v odstavku 1, ni možna;
— in paragraph 2, ‘forced or compulsory labour’ must be understood in the light of the ‘negative’ definitions contained in Article 4(3) of the ECHR:
— v odstavku 2 je treba „prisilno ali obvezno delo“ razumeti v luči „negativnih“ opredelitev iz tretjega odstavka 4. člena EKČP:
‘For the purpose of this article the term “forced or compulsory labour” shall not include:
„Pojem ‚prisilno ali obvezno delo‘ v zvezi s tem členom ne vključuje:
(a) any work required to be done in the ordinary course of detention imposed according to the provisions of Article 5 of this Convention or during conditional release from such detention;
(a) dela, ki se zahteva pri rednem prestajanju zapora v skladu z določbami 5. člena te Konvencije ali med pogojnim odpustom s prestajanja zaporne kazni,
(b) any service of a military character or, in case of conscientious objectors in countries where they are recognised, service exacted instead of compulsory military service;
(b) katerekoli službe vojaške narave, službe, ki jo zahtevajo namesto obveznega služenja vojske v državah, v katerih je ugovor vesti dopusten,
(c) any service exacted in case of an emergency or calamity threatening the life or wellbeing of the community;
(c) službe, ki je komu dodeljena ob nevarnosti ali ob nesreči, ko je ogroženo življenje ljudi ali blaginja skupnosti,
(d) any work or service which forms part of normal civic obligations.’.
(d) del ali služb, ki so sestavni del običajnih državljanskih dolžnosti.“
Paragraph 3 stems directly from human dignity and takes account of recent developments in organised crime, such as the organisation of lucrative illegal immigration or sexual exploitation networks.
Odstavek 3 izvira neposredno iz človekovega dostojanstva in upošteva nedavni razvoj organiziranega kriminala, kot so organiziranje pridobitnških mrež za nezakonito priseljevanje ali spolno izkoriščanje.
The Annex to the Europol Convention contains the following definition which refers to trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation: ‘traffic inhuman beings: means subjection of a person to the real and illegal sway of other persons by using violence or menaces or by abuse of authority or intrigue with a view to the exploitation of prostitution, forms of sexual exploitation and assault of minors or trade in abandoned children’.
Priloga h Konvenciji Europol vsebuje naslednjo opredelitev, ki se nanaša na trgovino z ljudmi z namenom spolnega izkoriščanja: „Trgovina z ljudmi pomeni izpostavljanje osebe dejanskemu in nezakonitemu vplivu drugih oseb z uporabo nasilja ali groženj ali z zlorabo oblasti ali intrigo z namenom izkoriščanja prostitucije, oblik spolnega izkoriščanja in zlorabe mladoletnikov ali trgovine z zapuščenimi otroki“.
Chapter VI of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, which has been integrated in to the Union's acquis, in which the United Kingdom and Ireland participate, contains the following wording in Article 27(1) which refers to illegal immigration networks: ‘The Contracting Parties undertake to impose appropriate penalties on any person who, for financial gain, assists or tries to assist an alien to enter or reside within the territory of one of the Contracting Parties in breach of that Contracting Party's laws on the entry and residence of aliens.’ On 19 July 2002, the Council adopted a framework decision on combating trafficking inhuman beings (OJ L 203, 1.8.2002, p.
Poglavje 6 Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma, ki je bilo vključeno v pravni red Unije in v katerem sodelujeta Združeno kraljestvo in Irska, vsebuje v členu 27(1) naslednje besedilo, ki se nanaša na mreže za nezakonito priseljevanje: „Pogodbenice ustrezno kaznujejo osebo, ki zaradi dobička tujcu pomaga ali poskuša pomagati vstopiti ali prebivati na ozemlju ene od pogodbenic v nasprotju z zakonodajo te pogodbenice o vstopu in prebivanju tujcev.“ Svet je 19. julija 2002 sprejel Okvirni sklep o boju proti trgovanju z ljudmi (UL L 203, 1.8.2002, str.
1) whose Article 1 defines in detail the offences concerning trafficking inhuman beings for the purposes of labour exploitation or sexual exploitation, which the Member States must make punishable by virtue of that framework decision.
1), ki v členu 1 podrobno opredeljuje kazniva dejanja v zvezi s trgovanjem z ljudmi za namene izkoriščanja delovne sile ali spolnega izkoriščanja, za katera morajo države članice na podlagi tega okvirnega sklepa zagotoviti, da so kazniva.
TITLE II — FREEDOMS
NASLOV II – SVOBOŠČINE
Explanation on Article 6 — Right to liberty and security
Pojasnilo k členu 6 – Pravica do svobode in varnosti
The rights in Article 6 are the rights guaranteed by Article 5 of the ECHR, and in accordance with Article 52(3) of the Charter, they have the same meaning and scope.
Pravice v členu 6 so pravice, ki jih zagotavlja 5. člen EKČP in imajo v skladu s členom 52(3) Listine enak pomen in obseg.
Consequently, the limitations which may legitimately be imposed on them may not exceed those permitted by the ECHR, in the wording of Article 5:
Omejitve, ki se lahko zanje legitimno uvedejo, zato ne smejo presegati omejitev iz člena 5 EKČP, ki določa:
(a) the lawful detention of a person after conviction by a competent court;
(a) zakonit pripor, odrejen s sodbo pristojnega sodišča,
(b) the lawful arrest or detention of a person for non-compliance with the lawful order of a court or in order to secure the fulfilment of any obligation prescribed by law;
(b) zakonit odvzem prostosti osebi, ki se ne pokori zakoniti odločbi sodišča, ali zato, da bi zagotovili izpolnitev kakšne z zakonom naložene obveznosti,
(c) the lawful arrest or detention of a person effected for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority on reasonable suspicion of having committed an offence or when it is reasonably considered necessary to prevent his committing an offence or fleeing after having done so;
(c) zakonit odvzem prostosti, ki je potreben zato, da bi osebo privedli pred pristojno sodno oblast ob utemeljenem sumu, da je storila kaznivo dejanje, ali kadar je to utemeljeno nujno zato, da bi preprečili storitev kaznivega dejanja ali beg po storjenem kaznivem dejanju,
(d) the detention of a minor by lawful order for the purpose of educational supervision or his lawful detention for the purpose of bringing him before the competent legal authority;
(d) pridržanje mladoletnika na podlagi zakonite odločbe zaradi vzgojnega nadzorstva ali zakonit odvzem prostosti mladoletniku zato, da bi ga privedli pred pristojno oblast,
(e) the lawful detention of persons for the prevention of the spreading of infectious diseases, of persons of unsound mind, alcoholics or drug addicts or vagrants;
(e) zakonito pridržanje oseb, da bi preprečili širjenje nalezljivih bolezni, ali duševno bolnih oseb, alkoholikov, narkomanov in potepuhov,
(f) the lawful arrest or detention of a person to prevent his effecting an unauthorised entry in to the country or of a person against whom action is being taken with a view to deportation or extradition.
(f) zakonit odvzem prostosti osebi z namenom, da bi ji preprečili nedovoljen vstop v državo, ali pripor osebe, proti kateri teče postopek za izgon ali za izročitev.
Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1.c of this Article shall be brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Vsakogar, ki mu je bila odvzeta prostost v skladu z določbami tč. c 1. odstavka tega člena, je treba takoj privesti pred sodnika ali drugo uradno osebo, ki na podlagi zakona izvršuje sodno oblast; vsakdo ima pravico, da mu sodijo v razumen roku ali ga izpustijo.
Everyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings by which the lawfulness of his detention shall be decided speedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful.
Vsakdo, ki mu je bila odvzeta prostost, ima pravico začeti postopek, v katerem bo sodišče hitro odločilo o zakonitosti odvzema prostosti in odredilo njegovo izpustitev, če je bil odvzem prostosti nezakonit.
Everyone who has been the victim of arrest or detention in contravention of the provisions of this Article shall have an enforceable right to compensation.’
Kdor je bil žrtev odvzema prostosti v nasprotju z določili tega člena, ima iztožljivo pravico do odškodnine.“
The rights enshrined in Article 6 must be respected particularly when the European Parliament and the Council adopt legislative acts in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters, on the basis of Articles 82, 83 and 85 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, notably to define common minimum provisions as regards the categorisation of offences and punishments and certain aspects of procedural law.
Pravice, zapisane v členu 6, je treba zlasti spoštovati, kadar Evropski parlamentin Svet sprejemata zakonodajne akte na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah na podlagi členov 82, 83 in 85 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske Unije, zlasti da se določijo skupne minimalne določbe o kvalifikaciji kršitev in kazni ter nekateri vidiki procesnega prava.
Explanation on Article 7 — Respect for private and family life
Pojasnilo k členu 7 – Spoštovanje zasebnega in družinskega življenja
The rights guaranteed in Article 7 correspond to those guaranteed by Article 8 of the ECHR.
Pravice, zagotovljene s členom 7, ustrezajo pravicam, zagotovljenim z 8. členom EKČP.
To take account of developments in technology the word ‘correspondence’ has been replaced by ‘communications’.
Zaradi upoštevanja tehnološkega razvoja je bila beseda „dopisovanje“ zamenjana s „komunikacijami“.
In accordance with Article 52(3), the meaning and scope of this right are the same as those of the corresponding article of the ECHR.
V skladu s členom 52(3) sta pomen in obseg te pravice enaka kot v ustreznem členu EKČP.
Consequently, the limitations which may legitimately be imposed on this right are the same as those allowed by Article 8 of the ECHR:
Zaradi tega so omejitve, ki se lahko zato pravico legitimno uvedejo, enake tistim, ki jih dovoljuje 8. člen EKČP:
There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic wellbeing of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.’
Javna oblast se ne sme vmešavati v izvrševanje te pravice, razen če je to določeno z zakonom in nujno v demokratični družbi zaradi držav nevarnosti, javne varnosti ali ekonomske blaginje države, zato da se prepreči nered ali zločin, da se zavaruje zdravje ali morala ali da se zavarujejo pravice in svoboščine drugih ljudi.“
Explanation on Article 8 — Protection of personal data
Pojasnilo k členu 8 – Varstvo osebnih podatkov
This Article has been based on Article 286 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
Ta člen temelji na členu 286 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in Direktivi 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str.
31) as well as on Article 8 of the ECHR and on the Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, which has been ratified by all the Member States.
31), kot tudi na 8. členu EKČP in Konvenciji Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o varstvu posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov, ki so jo ratificirale vse države članice.
Article 286 of the EC Treaty is now replaced by Article 16 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 39 of the Treaty on European Union.
Člen 286 Pogodbe ES je sedaj nadomeščen s členom 16 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in členom 39 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Reference is also made to Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).
Prav tako je treba omeniti Uredbo ES št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str. 1).
The above-mentioned Directive and Regulation contain conditions and limitations for the exercise of the right to the protection of personal data.
Zgoraj omenjeni direktiva in uredba vsebujeta pogoje in omejitve pri izvajanju pravice do varovanja osebnih podatkov.