natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The applicant in the main proceedings then appealed against that decision before the Regional Court, Koszalin, requesting that it grant her payment of the disability pension and contending that on account of Poland’s accession to the European Union her present place of residence could not be a ground for suspension of the benefit to which she is entitled.
Tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari je zato pri okrožnem sodi�ču v Koszalinu vložila zahtevo, naj se ji prizna izplačilo invalidske pokojnine, in je zatrjevala, da ob upo�tevanju pristopa Poljske k Evropski uniji njeno sedanje prebivali�če ne more biti razlog za ustavitev izplačila rent, do katerih je upravičena.
its consequences’.
njenih posledic“ 3.
3 The disability benefit at issue must be viewed as a benefit for victims of the consequences of war, having regard to its purpose and the conditions subject to which it is granted: irrespective of status as a worker, it seeks to provide compensation for the suffering endured following deportation. It does not therefore appear to be a quid pro quo for contributions paid, but is by way of compensation. 4
Vendar je treba zadevno dajatev za invalidnost glede na njen cilj in pogoje za njeno dodelitev upo�tevati kot dajatev za žrtve posledic vojne – dajatev je neodvisno od položaja delavca namenjena nadomestilu za trpljenje, povzročeno med prisilnim izgnanstvom; torej ni protidajatev za plačane prispevke, ampak ima značilnosti od�kodnine. 4
She may thus rely where relevant on the rights relating to such a status, 7 and that includes with regard to her Member State of origin.
Zato bi lahko, vključno z upo�tevanjem njene države članice izvora, uveljavljala pravice, ki izhajajo iz tega statusa 7.
They must nevertheless exercise the national competence which they retain in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty, in particular with those concerning the freedom given to every citizen of the Union to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States.
Vendar so med položaji, ki sodijo na področje uporabe ratione materiæ prava Skupnosti, tudi tisti v zvezi z izvajanjem temeljnih svobo�čin, ki jih zagotavlja Pogodba, zlasti tisti v zvezi s prostim gibanjem in prebivanjem na ozemlju držav članic, kot jih priznava člen 18 ES 10.
5That freedom
Poleg tega je
6 — The Court has expressly classified it as such (see Case C-224/98 D’Hoop [2002] ECR I-6191, paragraph 29).
I-6191, točka 29).
7 — See, to that effect, most recently Joined Cases C-11/06 and C-12/06 Morgan and Bucher [2007] ECR I-9161, paragraph 22.
7 – Glej v tem smislu nazadnje sodbo z dne 23. oktobra 2007 v združenih zadevah Morgan in Bucher (C-11/06 in C-12/06, ZOdl., str. I-9161, točka 22).
5 — See, for example, Case C-135/99 Elsen [2000] ECR I-10409, paragraph 33; Case C-148/02 Garcia Avello [2003] ECR I-11613, paragraph 25; Case C-209/03 Bidar [2005] ECR I-2119, paragraph 33; and Case C-192/05 Tas-Hagen and Tas [2006] ECR I-10451, paragraph 22.
9 – Glej zgoraj navedeni sodbi Tas-Hagen in Tas (točka 23) in Garcia Avello (točka 26).
10 Furthermore, by establishing her place of residence in Germany, Ms Nerkowska exercised her right to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State other than that of which she is a national and it is precisely on account of her place of residence that the Polish authorities refused to pay to her the disability pension to which she had been found to be entitled.
Nerkowska, s tem ko je izbrala svoje prebivali�če v Nemčiji, izvr�evala svojo pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju države članice, ki ni država članica, katere državljanka je, in ravno zato so ji poljski organi zavrnili izplačilo invalidske pokojnine, ki ji je bila priznana.
As the exercise of a right accorded by Community law has had an impact on the payment of a benefit under national legislation, such a situation cannot be considered to be a purely internal matter with no link to Community law. 11 host Member State by legislation in his State of origin penalising the mere fact that he has used them.
Ker je izvr�evanje pravice, ki jo priznava pravni red Skupnosti, vplivalo na izplačilo dajatve, določene v nacionalni ureditvi, takega položaja ni mogoče upo�tevati kot čisto notranjega in brez vsakr�ne zveze s pravom Skupnosti 11.
As Article 18(1) EC is applicable to a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, it must now be established whether it precludes national rules which make payment of a benefit granted in respect of harm suffered during a stay in a place of isolation subject to the condition that the victims thereof are resident in national territory.
Če bi bilo mogoče državljana Unije v državi članici, katere državljan je, obravnavati slab�e, kot bi bil obravnavan, če ne bi uporabil navedenih ugodnosti, to ne bi bilo združljivo s pravico do prostega gibanja; v takem primeru državljanu Unije v njegovi državi izvora ne bi bilo priznano enako pravno obravnavanje, kot je priznano državljanom te države, ki so v istem položaju; v manj ugodnem položaju bi bil le zato, ker je izvr�eval svojo svobodo do prostega gibanja in prebivanja v drugi državi članici 13.
It is settled caselaw that the opportunities offered by the Treaty in relation to freedom of movement cannot be fully effective if a national of a Member State can be deterred from availing himself of them by obstacles placed in the way of his stay in the
Ker se za položaj, kot je ta v postopku v glavni stvari, uporablja člen 18(1) ES, je treba ugotoviti, ali nasprotuje nacionalni ureditvi, ki plačilo dajatve, priznane za �kodo, nastalo med bivanjem v koncentracijskem tabori�ču, pogojuje s tem, da morajo žrtve prebivati na nacionalnem ozemlju.
National rules such as those at issue in the main proceedings introduce a difference in treatment between deported Polish nationals who are now resident in Poland and those who, having exercised their freedom of movement, have established their place of residence in another Member State.
Vendar nacionalna ureditev, kot je ta v postopku v glavni stvari, določa različno obravnavanje poljskih državljanov, žrtev izgnanstva, ki prebivajo na poljskem, in tistih, ki so z uporabo svoje pravice do gibanja izbrali prebivali�če v drugi državi članici.
By linking the payment of the disability pension for incapacity for work arising from a stay in a place of isolation to a condition requiring residence in national territory, those national rules place some nationals at a disadvantage by virtue of the mere fact of their exercising their freedom of movement by establishing their place of residence in another Member State and may thus deter them from doing
Navedena ureditev, s tem ko invalidsko pokojnino za nezmožnost za delo, ki izhaja iz bivanja v koncentracijskem tabori�ču, pogojuje s prebivali�čem na nacionalnem ozemlju, postavlja v neugoden položaj nekatere državljane le zato, ker so izvr�evali svojo pravico do gibanja, s tem da so izbrali svoje prebivali�če v drugi državi članici, in
12 — See Schwarz and Gootjes-Schwarz, paragraph 89 and the caselaw cited.
12 – Glej zgoraj navedeno sodbo Schwarz in Gootjes-Schwarz (točka 89) in navedeno sodno prakso.
13 — The status of citizen of the Union would thus be affected (see, for example, D’Hoop, paragraphs 28 and 30).
13 – Status državljana Unije bi bil zato prizadet (glej na primer zgoraj navedeno sodbo D’Hoop, točki 28 in 30).
11 — For similar reasoning see Tas-Hagen and Tas, paragraphs 24 to 28, and Case C-403/03 Schempp [2005] ECR I-6421, paragraphs 20 to 25.
11 – Za podobno razlogovanje glej zgoraj navedeno sodbo Tas-Hagen in Tas (točke od 24 do 28) in sodbo z dne 12. julija 2005 v zadevi Schempp (C-403/03, ZOdl., str. I-6421, točke od 20 do 25).
OPINION OF MR POIARES MADURO — CASE C-499/06 so.
POIARESA MADURA – ZADEVA C-499/06 lahko državljane od tega odvrača.
They therefore constitute a restriction on the freedoms conferred by Article 18(1) EC on every citizen of the Union.
Zato taka ureditev omejuje svobo�čine, ki jih priznava člen 18(1) ES vsem državljanom Unije.
It cannot be disputed that the objective of restricting the solidarity of a society to people who remain sufficiently integrated in that society may constitute, in certain cases, an objective consideration of public interest.
Ni sporno, da cilj omejitve solidarnosti neke družbe do oseb, ki vanjo niso dovolj vključene, lahko v določenih primerih pomeni objektivni preudarek v splo�nem interesu.
15 As Community law now stands, a Member State may make the grant of certain social benefits subject to the existence of a connection linking recipients to that State.
15Država članica lahko glede na sedanje stanje prava Skupnosti dodelitev določenih socialnih dajatev pogojuje z obstojem navezne okoli�čine med upravičenci in navedeno državo.
However, that connection may not always be in the form of a residence condition.
Vendar ta navezna okoli�čina ne more biti vedno pogoj prebivali�ča.
The national measure laid down to that end must be appropriate for the attainment of the legitimate objective pursued and not restrict the freedom of movement of citizens of the Union beyond what is necessary for that purpose.
Nacionalni ukrep, predviden za to, mora biti namreč primeren za dosego legitimnega zasledovanega cilja in ne sme bolj omejevati svobode gibanja državljanov Unije, kot je potrebno.
In that regard, the Polish authorities submit that the residence condition allows the recipient to testify to his desire to retain a connection with the society which shows him its solidarity in this way.
Poljski organi v zvezi s tem navajajo, da naj bi bila s pogojem prebivali�ča dokazana želja upravičenca po ohranitvi zveze z družbo, ki mu izkazuje solidarnost.
It is apparent from settled caselaw that such a restriction ‘can be justified in the light of Community law only if it is based on objective considerations of public interest independent of the nationality of the persons concerned and if it is proportionate to the legitimate objective pursued by the provisions of national law’, on the basis that ‘a measure is proportionate if, while appropriate for securing the attainment of the objective pursued, it does not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain that objective’. 14
Vendar iz ustaljene sodne prakse izhaja, da je taka omejitev z vidika prava Skupnosti „lahko utemeljena le, če temelji na objektivnih preudarkih v splo�nem interesu, ki niso odvisni od državljanstva zadevnih oseb, in če je sorazmerna s ciljem, ki ga legitimno zasleduje nacionalno pravo“, ker je „ukrep sorazmeren, če pri uresničenju zasledovanega cilja ne prekorači okvirov, ki so potrebni za njegovo doseganje“ 14.
I am not convinced by that argument.
Menim, da ta trditev ni prepričljiva.
A residence condition such as that laid down by the Polish legislation, namely one which requires that the recipient of the benefit be resident in national territory throughout the period of payment of the benefit, does not to me seem appropriate for the purpose of establishing the existence of a necessary connection.
Pogoj prebivali�ča, ki ga določa poljska zakonodaja, in sicer da zahteva, da se prebivali�če na nacionalnem ozemlju ohranja med celotnim obdobjem izplačila dajatve, se mi za ugotovitev obstoja potrebne navezne okoli�čine ne zdi ustrezen.
To merit national recognition and solidarity in respect of suffering which
Za pridobitev priznanja in nacionalne solidarnosti za prestano trpljenje,
As regards the existence of objective considerations of public interest, the Polish authorities’ main submission is that the national legislation in question has the aim of granting benefits to compensate for damage and suffering caused by wartime and postwar repression in general and, in particular, as regards the applicant in the main proceedings, by compulsory deportation to Siberia.
Poljske oblasti glede obstoja objektivnih preudarkov v splo�nem interesu v glavnem menijo, da je namen zadevne nacionalne zakonodaje dodelitev dajatev za povračilo �kode in trpljenja, povzročenih na splo�no z represijo med vojno in po njej ter posebej v primeru tožeče stranke v postopku v glavni stvari s prisilnim izgnanstvom v Sibirijo.
In so doing, Polish society seeks to show its solidarity with regard to the victims.
Tako želi poljska družba izkazati solidarnost z žrtvami.
Having regard to that objective, it is, in the Polish authorities’ view, legitimate to restrict that obligation of solidarity only to those people who retain a sufficient degree of connection with Polish society.
Ob upo�tevanju tega cilja bi bilo legitimno navedeno obveznost solidarnosti omejiti na osebe, ki ohranjajo zadostno povezanost s poljsko družbo.
15 — See Tas-Hagen and Tas, paragraph 35.
15 – Glej zgoraj navedeno sodbo Tas-Hagen in Tas (točka 35).
14 — Morgan and Bucher, paragraph 33 and the caselaw cited.
14 – Zgoraj navedena sodba Morgan in Bucher (točka 33) in navedena sodna praksa.
NERKOWSKA also ruled on the compatibility with Community law of a residence condition applied to the grant of a benefit for victims of war or of its consequences, to rebut that finding and justify the condition that the recipient of the benefit must be resident in national territory throughout the period of payment of the benefit.
NERKOWSKA v obdobju izplačila dajatve, ne morejo veljavno sklicevati na sodbo v zadevi Tas-Hagen in Tas, ki prav tako določa skladnost pogoja prebivali�ča za dodelitev dajatve za žrtve vojne ali njenih posledic s pravom Skupnosti.
It is true that in Tas-Hagen and Tas the Court held that a residence criterion is inappropriate for the purpose of attaining the objective of limiting the obligation of solidarity in so far as it is based solely on the date on which the application for the benefit is submitted and is thus liable to lead to different results for persons resident abroad whose degree of integration into the society of the Member State granting the benefit is in all respects comparable.
Sodi�če je v tej sodbi res razsodilo, da na podlagi merila prebivali�ča ni mogoče doseči cilja omejitve obveznosti solidarnosti, ker je bilo takrat, ko se je nana�alo izključno na datum vložitve zahteve za dajatev, sposobno privesti do različnih rezultatov za osebe, ki prebivajo v tujini in katerih stopnja vključenosti v družbo države članice, ki dodeljuje zadevno dajatev, je primerljiva v vseh pogledih 17.
17 That approach cannot, however, be interpreted as permitting a residence condition imposed over a longer period and capable of demonstrating a genuine difference with regard to the level of integration sought by the Member State.
Te re�itve pa ni mogoče razlagati tako, da priznava pogoj prebivali�ča, kadar bi bil naložen za dalj�e obdobje, tako da bi bila dokazana dejanska razlika glede na stopnjo vključenosti, ki jo želi država članica.
In the particular context of benefits for victims of war or its consequences, while a condition requiring a connection with national territory may be permissible, that is only in so far as the condition relates to the date of the harmful events and makes it possible to establish a person’s status as a victim towards whom the national community may be called upon to show its solidarity.
Čeprav je v posebnem kontekstu dajatev za žrtve vojne ali njenih posledic pogoj nacionalne teritorialnosti sprejemljiv le, če se nana�a na čas dogodkov, ki so povzročili �kodo, ta omogoča opredelitev statusa žrtve, za katero je lahko nacionalna skupnost pozvana, naj ji izkaže svojo solidarnost.
has been endured and to which the grant of benefits testifies, it is sufficient that a person has been a victim of repression on account of his nationality and/or place of residence.
za katero se plačujejo dajatve, zadostuje, da je bil posameznik zaradi svojega državljanstva in/ali svojega prebivali�ča žrtev represije.
It is the status of the victim as a member of the society, due to his place of residence and/or his nationality at the time of the repressive events, that establishes the connection which warrants a demonstration of solidarity by that society.
Ker je žrtev članica družbe – na podlagi svojega prebivali�ča in/ali svojega državljanstva med represijo –, je to navezna okoli�čina, s katero je utemeljeno izkazovanje solidarnosti družbe.
With regard to the legitimate objective of solidarity, there is, in my view, nothing to distinguish a Polish national who was a victim of such deportation by the Soviet regime and who is still resident in Polish territory from another Polish national who was a victim of such deportation and who is now resident in another Member State.
Glede na legitimni cilj solidarnosti menim, da se poljski državljan, ki je žrtev izgnanstva s strani sovjetskega režima in ki �e vedno prebiva na poljskem ozemlju, ne razlikuje od drugega poljskega državljana, ki je žrtev navedenega izgnanstva in ki zdaj živi v drugi državi članici.
The difference in treatment seems to me to be even less acceptable given that citizenship of the Union is destined to be the fundamental status of Member State nationals to which the fundamental freedom to move and reside in the whole of the Community area is attached.
Tako različno obravnavanje se mi zdi �e toliko manj sprejemljivo, ker je namen državljanstva Unije ustvariti temeljni status državljanov držav članic, ki je povezan s temeljno svobodo do gibanja in prebivanja v celotnem prostoru Skupnosti.
It follows that, in principle, a Member State can no longer make an obligation of solidarity dependent on integration established by a condition requiring a connection with national territory.
Iz tega izhaja, da država članica načeloma ne sme več pogojevati obveznosti solidarnosti z vključenostjo, ki jo ponazarja pogoj nacionalne teritorialnosti.
Citizenship of the Union must encourage Member States to no longer conceive of the legitimate link of integration only within the narrow bounds of the national community, but also within the wider context of the society of peoples of the Union. 16
Državljanstvo Unije mora države članice spodbujati, da ne pojmujejo legitimne povezave vključenosti le v ozkem okviru nacionalne skupnosti, ampak tudi v �ir�em okviru skupnosti narodov Unije 16.
The Polish authorities also give the need to monitor whether the conditions for
Poljski organi pogoj prebivali�ča prav tako utemeljujejo s potrebami nadzora obstoja in
16 — See, to the same effect, the Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak in Joined Cases C-396/05, C-419/05 and C-450/05 Habelt and Others [2007] ECR I-11895, points 82 to 84.
16 – Glej v tem smislu sklepne predloge generalne pravobranilke Trstenjak v združenih zadevah Habelt in drugi (sodba z dne 18. decembra 2007, C-396/05, C-419/05 in C-450/05, ZOdl., str. I-11895, točke od 82 do 84).
17 — Tas-Hagen and Tas, paragraphs 37 to 39.
17 – Zgoraj navedena sodba (točke od 37 do 39).
They submit that the condition allows the competent medical services to establish the applicant’s state of health, to determine the link between the harm found to exist and the deportation, to assess the incapacity for work and, in the event that they decide that it is temporary in nature, to make the recipient subject to further examinations at the end of the period decided upon.
Pristojnim zdravstvenim službam naj bi omogočil, da ugotovijo zdravstveno stanje vlagatelja zahteve, da ugotovijo zvezo med ugotovljeno �kodo in izgnanstvom, da ocenijo nezmožnost za delo in da v primeru, če bi odločili, da je ta začasna, upravičenca po prenehanju veljavnosti navedene odločbe ponovno pregledajo.
of the benefits according to the needs of recipients in terms of health and living conditions.
skladu s potrebami upravičencev na področju zdravja in življenjskih razmer.
In addition to a disability pension, the amount of which may vary in order to ensure that the recipient has a minimum standard of living, the national legislation at issue also provides for various benefits, such as, inter alia, reductions in respect of transport costs, vocational training, special provision of treatment and an electric wheelchair.
Zadevna nacionalna zakonodaja je namreč poleg invalidske pokojnine, katere znesek se lahko za zagotovitev primerne življenjske ravni upravičencu spreminja, določala tudi različne storitve, kot so zlasti znižanje stro�kov za prevoz, poklicno izobraževanje, posebne storitve nege in motoriziran invalidski voziček.
Therefore, the aim of adapting to the recipient’s situation the benefits intended to compensate for the harm suffered as a result of a stay in a place of isolation may not be properly taken into account if there is no condition requiring residence in Polish territory.
Zato skrb za prilagoditev dajatev, namenjenih za povračilo �kode, ki je nastala zaradi bivanja v koncentracijskem tabori�ču, položaju upravičenca ne more biti ustrezno upo�tevana brez pogoja prebivali�ča na poljskem ozemlju.
However, although the demands of monitoring the conditions under which a social benefit is obtained constitute an objective consideration of public interest, 18the requirement of residence in national territory throughout the period of payment of the benefit clearly appears to exceed what is necessary in order to attain that objective.
Čeprav pomeni potreba po nadzoru pogojev za pridobitev socialne dajatve objektivni preudarek v splo�nem interesu 18, se zdi, da zahteva po prebivali�ču na nacionalnem ozemlju v celotnem obdobju izplačila dajatve jasno presega to, kar je potrebno za dosego tega cilja.
It is possible to envisage different means which are appropriate to attain the objective pursued, but are less of a restriction on the freedom of movement and residence of citizens of the Union.
Za zasledovani cilj so predvideni drugi prilagojeni ukrepi, ki manj omejujejo svobodo gibanja in prebivanja državljanov Unije.
Clearly, it would be sufficient, for example, to require that the applicant appear for the purposes of a medical check before the competent national services when the application is examined.
Očitno bi zadostovalo, če bi na primer od vlagatelja zahteve ob preizkusu le-te zahtevali, da pri pristojnih nacionalnih službah opravi zdravni�ki pregled.
By that line of argument, the Republic of Poland implicitly refers to the Court’s caselaw permitting a residence condition, in derogation from the principle of the exportability of social security benefits, where the benefits are ‘closely linked with the social environment’.
Republika poljska se s to trditvijo posredno sklicuje na sodno prakso Sodi�ča, ki z odstopanjem od načela plačevanja dajatev iz socialne varnosti v tujino dovoljuje pogoj prebivali�ča, kadar so dajatve „tesno povezane s socialnim okoljem“ 19.
19The idea behind those decisions is that, where the amount and the nature of the benefit are based on the standard of living and living conditions in the Member State which grants it, the residence condition laid down in order to obtain the benefit appears to be legitimate, appropriate and necessary. 20
Zamisel, na kateri temeljijo te re�itve, je, da kadar sta znesek in narava dajatve odvisna od življenjske ravni in razmer v državi članici, ki dajatev odobri, se zdi pogoj prebivali�ča, postavljen za njeno pridobitev, legitimen, primeren in potreben 20.
In order to justify the residence condition at issue in the main proceedings, the Polish authorities submit lastly that they have the power to vary the amount and the nature
Poljski organi za utemeljitev pogoja prebivali�ča, ki je predmet postopka v glavni stvari, nazadnje navajajo svojo pristojnost spremembe zneska in narave dajatev v
18 — See to that effect, with regard to an unemployment allowance, Case C-406/04 De Cuyper [2006] ECR I-6947, paragraph 41.
20 – Glej sklepne predloge generalnega pravobranilca Légerja v zgoraj navedeni zadevi Snares (točke od 85 do 88).
20 — See the Opinion of Advocate General Léger in Snares, points 85 to 88.
18 – Glej v tem smislu v zvezi z nadomestilom za brezposelnost sodbo z dne 18. julija 2006 v zadevi De Cuyper (C-406/04, ZOdl., str. I-6947, točka 41).
At most, the amount of that pension can be adapted on the basis of the economic standard of living in Poland.
Dajatve, ki jih je tako določila sodna praksa, označujejo dajatve, katerih bistveno merilo za dodelitev je pomanjkanje posameznika, in mu zato posku�ajo zagotoviti primerno življenjsko raven v gospodarskem in socialnem okviru države članice, ki plačuje navedene dajatve.