natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
38 paid as sugar ‘disposed of for consumption within the Community’ within the meaning of Article 15(1)(b) of the basic regulation.
38 v predelanih proizvodih in v zvezi s katerim niso bila izplačana izvozna nadomestila, �teje, da je bil „proda[n] za porabo v Skupnosti“ v smislu člena 15(1)(b) osnovne uredbe.
That is clearly not a natural meaning of the phrase.
To pa očitno ni običajen pomen te povedi.
The Commission has referred in Saint Louis Sucre to caselaw holding that the Community legislature enjoys a wide discretionary power in matters concerning the common agricultural policy, corresponding to the political responsibilities given to it by Articles 34 to 37 EC.
Komisija se je v zadevi Saint-Louis Sucre sklicevala na sodno prakso, ki daje zakonodajalcu Skupnosti �iroko polje proste presoje v zadevah skupne kmetijske politike, kar ustreza političnim odgovornostim, ki jih ima po členih od 34 do 37 ES.
Consequently, judicial review must be limited to verifying that the measure in question is not vitiated by any manifest error or misuse of powers and that the authority concerned has not manifestly exceeded the limits of its power of assessment. 39
Zato je treba sodni nadzor omejiti na preveritev, ali je v zvezi z zadevnim ukrepom pri�lo do očitne napake v presoji oziroma zlorabe pooblastil in ali z zadevnim pooblastilom ni bilo očitno preseženo pooblastilo za presojo. 39
However, it must be borne in mind that the notion of ‘sugar … disposed of for consumption within the Community’ has no independent significance.
Vendar pa je treba upo�tevati, da „sladkor […], proda[n] za porabo v Skupnosti“, nima neodvisnega pomena.
It is merely a label attached to an intermediate step in calculating the ‘exportable surplus’. The meaning that might normally be given to that label in other contexts is therefore not particularly important.
Gre le za oznako vmesnega koraka pri izračunu „presežka, ki se izvozi.“ Običajen pomen te oznake v drugih kontekstih torej ni posebej pomemben.
The Court has indeed ruled to that effect.
Sodi�če je res tako razsodilo.
That does not however give the Community legislature carte blanche in the agricultural sector.
Vendar pa to zakonodajalcu Skupnosti ne daje čeka bianko (carte blanche) na področju kmetijstva.
The Court has not excluded judicial review of the institutions’ exercise of their wide discretionary powers.
Sodi�če ni izključilo sodnega nadzora nad tem, kako institucije izvajajo svoja �iroka pooblastila za presojo po prostem preudarku.
If such review is to be of any value, it must be possible for the Court to intervene when, as in the present cases, the method of calculation of a produc-
Če naj ima tak nadzor kakr�en koli pomen, potem mora biti Sodi�če sposobno poseči takrat, ko – kot je to v obravnavanih zadevah – metoda izračuna proizvodne
38 — An alternative would be to regard the original processing of sugar into processed products as amounting to disposal of that sugar within the Community but then to qualify that interpretation so that where export refunds were paid on the sugar used in the processing, that processing was not after all disposal within the Community.
38 – Druga re�itev bi bila, da bi �teli izvirno predelavo sladkorja v predelane proizvode kot prodajo tega sladkorja znotraj Skupnosti, potem pa bi to razlago prilagodili, tako da kadar so bila za sladkor, uporabljen pri predelavi, izplačana izvozna nadomestila, se taka predelava ni zgodila po celotni prodaji znotraj Skupnosti.
That interpretation appears to me to be more artificial, and hence less attractive, than the interpretation I suggest.
Ta razlaga se mi zdi bolj umetna in torej manj privlačna kot razlaga, ki jo predlagam.
If it were none the less regarded as essential to arrive at an interpretation of ‘sugar … disposed of for consumption within the Community’ which is reconcilable with its broader context, I consider that that can be done.
Če pa bi se kljub temu menilo, da je bistveno doseči tako razlago „sladkorja […], proda[nega] za porabo v Skupnosti,“ ki je združljiva z njegovim �ir�im kontekstom, menim da je to mogoče.
The solution, in my view, is to regard sugar exported at no cost to the Community — including sugar exported in processed products in respect of which no export refunds have been paid — as tantamount to sugar disposed of for consumption within the Community.
Mislim, da je re�itev v tem, da se za izvoženi sladkor, ki ne gre v stro�ke Skupnosti – vključno s sladkorjem, izvoženim v predelanih proizvodih, v zvezi s katerim niso bila izplačana izvozna nadomestila –, �teje, da gre za sladkor, ki je bil izvožen za porabo v Skupnosti.
That interpretation, while somewhat contrived, seems to me to be
Ta razlaga – čeprav je nekoliko prisiljena – se mi zdi
essentially whether Article 15 of the basic regulation requires that, when determining the average loss per tonne of sugar, all exports, including those in respect of which no export refunds were paid, are to be taken into account, or whether on the contrary exports in respect of which no export refunds were paid should be left out of the calculation.
dajatve, ki je namenjena temu, da proizvajalci krijejo stro�ke Skupnosti zaradi prodaje presežne proizvodnje, očitno vodi v prevelika plačila in tako proizvajalcem nalaga nesorazmerno breme.
I am accordingly of the view that, when determining the exportable surplus, account should be taken only of those export quantities of sugar in respect of which export refunds have actually been paid.
Zato menim, da je treba pri določanju presežka, ki se izvozi, upo�tevati samo tiste izvozne količine sladkorja, v zvezi s katerimi so bila izvozna nadomestila dejansko izplačana.
It is common ground that Article 6(4) of the implementing regulation does not reflect that interpretation.
Ni sporno, da člen 6(4) izvedbene uredbe ne izraža navedene razlage.
It follows that that provision, together with Regulations Nos 1837/2002, 1762/2003 and 1775/2004, is to that extent invalid.
Zato ta določba, kot tudi Uredbe �t. 1837/2002, 1762/2003 in 1775/2004, v tem obsegu ni veljavna.
Determination of the average loss
Določanje povprečne izgube
It will be recalled that in accordance with Article 15 of the basic regulation the overall loss, which determines the rate of the production levy, is the product of the exportable surplus and the average loss per tonne.
Opozoriti je treba na to, da je skladno s členom 15 osnovne uredbe skupna izguba, ki določa stopnjo proizvodne dajatve, zmnožek presežka, ki se izvozi, in povprečne izgube na tono.
The average loss per tonne is the difference between the total amount of refunds and the total amount of levies divided by the total tonnage of export obligations to be fulfilled that marketing year.
Povprečna izguba je razlika med skupnim zneskom nadomestila in skupnim zneskom dajatev, deljena s skupno tonažo izvoznih obveznosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti v določenem tržnem letu.
Article 6(5) of the implementing regulation defines export obligations to be fulfilled during the current marketing year as, essentially, all sugar to be exported in the natural state with export refunds 40 fixed by tenders opened in respect of that marketing year or on the basis of export licences issued during that marketing year and all foreseeable exports of sugar in the form of processed products with export refunds 41fixed for that purpose during that marketing year, such quantities being spread evenly over the marketing year.
Člen 6(5) izvedbene uredbe v bistvu opredeljuje izvozne obveznosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti v tekočem tržnem letu, kot ves sladkor za izvoz v naravnem stanju z izvoznimi nadomestili, 40določenimi na podlagi razpisov, odprtih za navedeno tržno leto, ali na podlagi izvoznih dovoljenj, izdanih v navedenem tržnem letu, in ves predviden izvoz sladkorja v obliki predelanih proizvodov z izvoznimi nadomestili, 41 določenimi v ta namen v navedenem tržnem letu, pri čemer se te količine enakomerno razporedijo med vsem tržnim letom.
The third question in Jülich and the second question in Saint Louis Sucre asks
S tretjim vpra�anjem v zadevi Zuckerfabrik Jülich in z drugim vpra�anjem v zadevi Saint-Louis Sucre se v bistvu spra�uje, ali člen 15 osnovne uredbe zahteva, da je treba pri določanju povprečne izgube na tono
ZUCKERFABRIK JÜLICH AND OTHERS basis of all exports whereas the average loss is calculated on the basis only of those exports in respect of which export refunds have been paid, that may result in the production levy exceeding the actual losses, which would be contrary to the principle of self-financing.
ZUCKERFABRIK JÜLICH IN DRUGI samo na podlagi tistega izvoza, v zvezi s katerim so bila izplačana izvozna nadomestila, potem to lahko vodi v položaj, v katerem proizvodna dajatev presega dejansko izgubo, kar pa je v nasprotju z načelom samofinanciranja.
The applicants and the French Government repeat that, in calculating the overall loss, sugar which has caused no loss to the Community should be excluded from the exportable surplus, one of the elements in that calculation.
Tožeče stranke in francoska vlada ponavljajo, da bi bilo treba pri izračunu skupne izgube iz presežka, ki se izvozi in je eden od elementov pri tem izračunu, izvzeti sladkor, ki ni povzročil nobene izgube Skupnosti.
If the Commission worked on that basis, it would be logical for it to exclude such sugar also when calculating the average loss, the other element.
Če je Komisija ukrepala na tej podlagi, potem bi bilo logično, da bi ta sladkor izvzela tudi pri izračunu povprečne izgube, ki je drugi element.
The Commission presently does this.
Komisija to trenutno tudi počne.
This question has been raised in the alternative, namely in the event that the Court rules that, in calculating the overall loss, all sugar exported in processed products should be taken into account.
To vpra�anje je bilo postavljeno podredno, če bi Sodi�če razsodilo, da je treba pri izračunu skupne izgube upo�tevati ves sladkor, izvožen v predelanih proizvodih.
In that case, if the Commission does not also take into account, in calculating the average loss, all sugar exported in processed products, whether or not export refunds have been paid, the calculation will be distorted since the figure for exports used to calculate the exportable surplus will be higher than that used to calculate the average loss.
V tem primeru bo, če Komisija pri izračunu povprečne izgube ne upo�teva vsega sladkorja, izvoženega v predelanih proizvodih, ne glede na to, ali so bila izvozna nadomestila izplačana ali ne, izračun izkrivljen, saj bo �tevilka za izvoz, ki se uporabi pri izračunu presežka, ki se izvozi, vi�ja kot tista, ki se uporabi pri izračunu povprečne izgube.
That would be contrary to the principle of proportionality, since the average loss would be artificially inflated and thus not reflect the actual average cost of all the exports taken into account in calculating the overall loss.
To naj bi bilo v nasprotju z načelom sorazmernosti, saj bi bila povprečna izguba umetno povečana in tako ne bi izražala dejanskih povprečnih stro�kov za ves izvoz, ki se ga upo�teva pri izračunu skupne izgube.
The Commission notes that the Council expressly used the term ‘export obligations’ and not ‘quantities exported’ in Article 15(1) (d) of the basic regulation.
Komisija ugotavlja, da je Svet v čle -nu 15(1)(d) osnovne uredbe izrecno uporabil izraz „izvozne obveznosti“, ne pa izraza „i3žene količine“.
The term ‘obligations’ assumes that exports have the support of Community measures, namely in the present case export refunds.
Izraz „obveznosti“ pomeni, da ima izvoz podporo v ukrepih Skupnosti, kar so v obravnavani zadevi izvozna nado -mestila.
Moreover, since the objective of calculating the average loss is to determine the cost per unit of surplus sugar available on the market, in determining that cost only the quantities in respect of which a genuine disposal cost has been borne should be included.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba glede na to, da je cilj izračuna povprečne izgube v tem, da se ugotovi stro�ke na enoto presežnega sladkorja na trgu, pri določanju teh stro�kov vključiti samo količine, v zvezi s katerimi so bili kriti resnični stro�ki prodaje.
The Greek and Italian Governments make no submissions on the interpretation of average loss.
Gr�ka in italijanska vlada nista predložili stali�č v zvezi z razlago povprečne izgube.
The German Government submits that, if the exportable surplus is determined on the
Nem�ka vlada trdi, da če se presežek, ki se izvozi, določa na podlagi vsega izvoza, medtem ko se povprečna izguba izračunava
Article 15(1)(d) defines the average loss or revenue as the difference between the total amount of refunds and the total amount of levies divided by the total tonnage of export obligations to be fulfilled during the current
Člen 15(1)(d) določa, da je povprečna izguba razlika med skupnim zneskom nadomestila in skupnim zneskom nadomestil, deljena s skupno tonažo izvoznih obveznosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti v tekočem tržnem letu.
In practice that difference normally leads to an average loss, since world prices are normally below supported Community prices.
V praksi ta razlika običajno vodi v povprečno izgubo, saj so svetovne cene običajno pod subvencioniranimi cenami Skupnosti.
That average loss is then multiplied by the exportable surplus in order to obtain an estimate of overall loss.
Ta povprečna izguba se nato pomnoži s presežkom, ki se izvozi, tako da se dobi predvideno skupno izgubo.
That loss in turn is divided by estimated sugar production and the resulting amount charged to producers as the basic production levy.
Ta izguba se nato deli z ocenjeno proizvodnjo sladkorja, rezultat pa se zaračuna proizvajalcem kot osnovna proizvodna dajatev.
I have already explained why I consider that, when calculating the exportable surplus, sugar contained in exported processed products should be taken into account only when it has benefited from export refunds.
Pojasnila sem že, zakaj menim, da bi bilo treba pri izračunu presežka, ki se izvozi, sladkor, ki ga vsebujejo predelani proizvodi, upo�tevati samo, kadar je bil upravičen do izvoznih nadomestil.
It is common ground that logic dictates that, if that is so, the other element in determining the estimated overall loss, namely the average loss, should similarly take into account sugar exported in processed products only when it has benefited from export refunds.
Če je tako, ni sporno, da bi se moral tudi drugi element pri določanju predvidene skupne izgube, to je povprečna izguba, podobno sladkor, ki je izvožen v predelanih proizvodih, upo�tevati samo, kadar je bil upravičen do izvoznih nadomestil.
For the reasons given above, I am of the view that the questions referred by the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf in Case C-5/06 should be answered as follows:
Iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov menim, da bi bilo treba na vpra�anja za predhodno odločanje, ki jih je v zadevi C-5/06 predložilo Finanzgericht Düsseldorf, odgovoriti:
‘— Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector requires that, when determining the exportable surplus, account should be taken only of those export quantities of sugar, isoglucose and inulin syrup in respect of which export refunds have actually been paid.
– Člen 15 Uredbe Sveta (ES) �t. 1260/2001 z dne 19. junija 2001 o skupni ureditvi trgov za sladkor zahteva, da je treba pri določanju presežka, ki se izvozi, upo�tevati samo tiste izvozne količine sladkorja, v zvezi s katerimi so bila dejansko izplačana izvozna nadomestila.
— Article 6(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 314/2002 of 20 February 2002 laying down detailed rules for the application of the quota system in the sugar sector, as
– Člen 6(4) Uredbe Komisije (ES) �t. 314/2002 z dne 20. februarja 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje sistema kvot v sektorju sladkorja, kot je bil spre-
Regulation No 1260/2001 (the basic regulation)
Uredba 1260/2001 (osnovna uredba)
Article 15 of the basic regulation provides, in so far as is relevant:
Člen 15 osnovne uredbe določa, kolikor je upo�tevno:
Before the end of each marketing year, the following shall be recorded:
Pred koncem vsakega tržnega leta se ugotovi:
(a) a forecast of the production of A and B sugar, A and B isoglucose and A and B inulin syrup attributable to the marketing year concerned;
(a) predvideno proizvodnjo sladkorja A in B, izoglukoze A in B ter inulinskega sirupa A in B, ki se pripi�e zadevnemu tržnemu letu;
(b) a forecast of the quantities of sugar, isoglucose and inulin syrup disposed of for consumption within the Community during the marketing year concerned;
(b) predvideno količino sladkorja, izoglukoze in inulinskega sirupa, ki se v tekočem tržnem letu proda za porabo v Skupnosti;
(d) an estimate of the average loss or revenue per tonne of sugar for export obligations to be fulfilled during the current marketing year.
(d) predvideno povprečno izgubo ali povprečni dohodek na tono sladkorja glede na izvozne obveznosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti v tekočem tržnem letu.
This average loss or revenue shall be equal to the difference between the total amount of refunds and the total amount of levies on the total tonnage of export obligations in question;
Ta povprečna izguba ali povprečni dohodek ustreza razliki med skupnim zneskom nadomestil in skupnim zneskom dajatev glede na skupno tonažo zadevnih izvoznih obveznosti;
(e) an estimate of overall loss or revenue, obtained by multiplying the surplus referred to in (c) by the average loss or revenue referred to in (d).
(e) predvideno skupno izgubo ali dohodek, ki se izračuna tako, da se presežek iz (c) pomnoži s povprečno izgubo ali dohodkom iz (d).
Before the end of the 2005/06 marketing year and without prejudice to Article 10(3), (4), (5) and (6), the following shall be recorded cumulatively for the 2001/02 to 2005/06 marketing years:
Pred koncem tržnega leta 2005/2006 in brez poseganja v člene 10(3), (4), (5) in (6) se za tržna leta 2001/2002 do 2005/2006 kumulativno ugotovi:
(a) the exportable surplus established on the basis of the definitive production of A and B sugar, A and B isoglucose and A and B inulin syrup and the definitive quantity of sugar, isoglucose and inulin syrup disposed of for consumption within the Community;
(a) presežek za izvoz, ki se izračuna na osnovi končne proizvodnje sladkorja A in B, izoglukoze A in B ter inulinskega sirupa A in B in končne proizvodnje sladkorja, izoglukoze in inulinskega sirupa, ki se proda za porabo v Skupnosti;
(b) the average loss or revenue per tonne of sugar resulting from the total export obligations concerned, calculated using the method described in the second subparagraph of paragraph 1(d) above;
(b) povprečno izgubo ali dohodek na tono sladkorja, ki izhaja iz skupne izvozne obveznosti, in se izračuna z uporabo metode iz drugega pododstavka odstavka 1(d);
(c) the overall loss or revenue, obtained by multiplying the surplus referred to in (a) by the average loss or revenue referred to in (b);
(c) skupno izgubo ali dohodek, ki se izračuna tako, da se presežek iz (a) pomnoži s povprečno izgubo ali dohodkom iz (b);
(d) the sum total of the basic production levies and the B levies charged.
(d) skupni znesek zaračunanih osnovnih proizvodnih dajatev in dajatev B.
The estimate of overall loss or revenue referred to in paragraph 1(e) shall be adjusted by the difference between the amounts referred to in (c) and (d).
Predvidena skupna izguba ali skupni dohodek iz odstavka 1(e) se prilagodi v skladu z razliko med zneskoma iz (c) in (d).
The resulting amount shall be charged to manufacturers as a basic production levy on their production of A and B sugar, A and B isoglucose and A and B inulin syrup.
Pridobljeni znesek se zaračuna proizvajalcem kot osnovna proizvodna dajatev za njihovo proizvodnjo sladkorja A in B, izoglukoze A in B ter inulinskega sirupa A in B.
However, this levy shall not exceed:
Vendar pa ta dajatev ne sme presegati:
— for sugar, 2% of the intervention price for white sugar,
– pri sladkorju 2 % intervencijske cene za beli sladkor,
— for inulin syrup, expressed as sugar/isoglucose equivalent by applying a coefficient of 1.9, the maximum amount payable on white sugar, and
– pri inulinskem sirupu, izraženem kot ekvivalentom sladkorja/izoglukoze z uporabo koeficienta 1,9, najvi�jega zneska, plačljivega za beli sladkor, in
— for isoglucose, the share of the basic production levy borne by sugar manufacturers.
– pri izoglukozi deleža osnovne proizvodne dajatve, ki jo nosijo proizvajalci sladkorja.
Should the maximum permitted basic production levy not fully cover the overall loss referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3, the balance not covered shall be divided by the estimated production of B sugar, B isoglucose and B inulin syrup attributable to the marketing year in question.
Če maksimalna dovoljena osnovna proizvodna dajatev ne pokrije v celoti skupne izgube iz prvega pododstavka odstavka 3, se preostali znesek deli s predvideno proizvodnjo sladkorja B, izoglukoze B in inulinskega sirupa B, ki velja za zadevno tržno leto.
The resulting amount shall be charged to manufacturers as a B levy on their production of B sugar, B isoglucose and B inulin syrup.
Pridobljeni znesek se zaračuna proizvajalcem kot dajatev B za njihovo proizvodnjo sladkorja B, izoglukoze B ter inulinskega sirupa B.
However, subject to paragraph 5, this levy shall not exceed:
Vendar pa skladno z odstavkom 5 ta dajatev ne presega:
— for B sugar, 30% of the intervention price for white sugar,
– pri sladkorju B 30 % intervencijske cene za beli sladkor,
— for B inulin syrup, expressed as sugar/isoglucose equivalent by applying a coefficient of 1.9, the maximum amount payable on B white sugar, and
– pri inulinskem sirupu B, izraženem kot ekvivalentom sladkorja/izoglukoze z uporabo koeficienta 1,9, najvi�jega zneska, plačljivega za beli sladkor B, in
— for B isoglucose, the share of the B levy borne by sugar manufacturers.
– pri izoglukozi B deleža dajatve B, ki jo nosijo proizvajalci sladkorja.
Where the figures recorded under paragraph 1 suggest that the foreseeable overall loss for the current marketing year is unlikely to be covered by the expected proceeds from the levies because of the ceilings on the basic production levy and the B levy fixed in paragraphs 3 and 4, then the maximum percentage referred to in the first indent of paragraph 4 shall be adjusted to the extent necessary to cover the overall loss, without exceeding 37.5%.
Če zneski, ugotovljeni skladno z odstavkom 1, kažejo, da predvidena skupna izguba za tekoče tržno leto verjetno ne bo pokrita iz pričakovanih prihodkov iz dajatev zaradi omejitve pri osnovni proizvodni dajatvi in dajatvi B, določeni v odstavkih 3 in 4, se lahko maksimalni odstotni delež iz prve alinee odstavka 4 prilagodi tako, da pokrije skupno izgubo, pri čemer pa ne sme preseči 37,5 %.
The revised maximum percentage for the B levy shall be fixed for the current marketing year before 15 September.
Popravljeni maksimalni odstotni delež za dajatev B se določi za tekoče tržno leto pred 15. septembrom.
The minimum price for B beet referred to in Article 4(1)(b) shall be adjusted accordingly.
Minimalna cena za sladkorno peso B iz člena 4(1)(b) se ustrezno prilagodi.
All the losses resulting from the grant of production refunds under Article 7(3) shall be taken into account when calculating the overall loss referred to in paragraph 1(e).
Pri izračunu skupne izgube iz odstavka 1(e) se upo�tevajo vse izgube, ki izhajajo iz odobritve proizvodnih nadomestil iz člena 7(3).
The levies referred to in this Article shall be collected by the Member States.
Dajatve iz tega člena zaračunavajo države članice.
Detailed rules for applying this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 42(2), and shall cover in particular:
Izvedbene določbe za uporabo tega člena bodo sprejete v skladu s postopkom iz člena 42(2), �e zlasti pa bodo zajemale:
— the amounts of the levies to be collected,
– zneske dajatev, ki jih je treba zaračunati,
— the revised maximum percentage for the B levy,
– popravljeni maksimalni odstotni delež za dajatev B,
— the adjusted minimum price for B beet corresponding to the revised maximum percentage for the B levy.’
– prilagojeno minimalno ceno za sladkorno peso B, ki ustreza popravljenemu maksimalnemu odstotnemu deležu za dajatev B.“