natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the third meeting, the EDPS gave an overview of developments in his advisory role on proposals for new legislation.
Na tretji seji pa je podal pregled sprememb, ki zadevajo njegovo svetovalno vlogo pri zakonodajnih predlogih.
e German presidency has decided to continue on the same basis with discussions on possible Commission initiatives and other relevant subjects in a first pillar context. e EDPS will be following these activities with great interest, and is available to advise and cooperate where appropriate.
Nemško predsedstvo je sklenilo, da na istih temeljih nadaljuje razprave o možnih pobudah Komisije in o drugih pomembnih zadevah v okviru prvega stebra. ENVP bo te dejavnosti spremljal z velikim zanimanjem in izraža pripravljenost za svetovanje in sodelovanje, če bi to bilo potrebno.
of information under the principle of availability, on which the EDPS issued an opinion on 28 February
Peter Hustinx na tiskovni konferenci pripravila Komisija o izmenjavi informacij na podlagi načela dostopnosti; ENVP je mnenje o njem izdal 28.
Both proposals were interrelated, and this implied that the adoption of the f i first proposal was a precondition for the adoption of the second one.
Predloga sta februarja 2006 (glej odstavek 3.3.3)( med seboj povezana, kar pomeni, da je sprejetje prvega predloga predpogoj za sprejetje drugega.
Article 46(f)(ii) of Regulation EC (No) 45/2001 provides that the EDPS cooperates with the supervisory data protection bodies established under Title VI of the EU Treaty (‘third pillar’), with a view to improving ‘consistency in applying the rules and procedures with which they are respectively responsible for ensuring compliance’.
Člen 46(f)(ii) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 določa, da ENVP sodeluje z nadzornim organi za varstvo podatkov, ustanovljenimi na podlagi naslova VI Pogodbe EU („tretji steber“), in sicer z namenom, da se izboljša „doslednost pri uporabi pravil in postopkov, s katerimi so odgovorni za zagotavljanje skladnosti“ („consistency in applying the rules and procedures with which they are respectively responsible for ensuring compliance“). Ti nadzorni organi so skupni nadzorni organi v okviru schengena (JSB – Joint Supervisory Bodies), Europol, Eurojust in carinski informacijski sistem (CIS – Customs Information System).
Most of these bodies are composed of (partly the same) representatives of national supervisory authorities.
Večino teh organov sestavljajo – deloma isti – predstavniki nacionalnih nadzornih organov.
In practice, cooperation takes place with the relevant JSBs, supported by a joint data protection secretariat in the Council, and, more generally, with national DPAs.
V praksi sodelovanje poteka s pristojnimi JSB, ki jim pomaga skupni sekretariat za varstvo podatkov pri Svetu, splošneje pa z nacionalnimi organi za varstvo podatkov.
e need for close cooperation between national DPAs and the EDPS has been made apparent in recent years by the steady increase of initiatives at European level to fight organised crime and terrorism, including different proposals for exchange of personal data.
Potreba po tesnem sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi za varstvo podatkov in ENVP je v zadnjih letih postala očitna, saj je na evropski ravni stalno naraščalo število pobud v zvezi z bojem proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu, vključno z različnimi predlogi za izmenjavo osebnih podatkov.
At the Conference of European Data Protection Authorities held on 24 and 25 April 2006 in Budapest (see paragraph 4.4), a declaration was adopted. It reminds Member States that sharing personal information between their law enforcement authorities is permissible only on the basis of data protection rules ensuring a high and harmonised data protection standard at European level and in all participating States.
Na konferenci evropskih organov za varstvo podatkov, ki je potekala 24. and 25. aprila 2006 v Budimpešti (glej odstavek 4.4) je bila sprejeta izjava z opozorilom državam članicam, da je izmenjava osebnih informacij med njihovimi organi kazenskega pregona dopustna le na podlagi takšnih pravil o varstvu podatkov, ki zagotavljajo visoko in usklajeno raven varstva podatkov v evropskem okviru in v vseh sodelujočih državah članicah.
Otherwise, the different levels of protection and the lack of common rules for access control to information could give rise to situations where minimum data protection standards are not respected.
Sicer bi razhajanja v ravni zaščite in odsotnost skupnih pravil o nadzoru nad dostopom do informacij lahko privedli do situacij, ko minimalni standardi varstva podatkov ne bi bili upoštevani. Konferenca je že
In 2006, most attention centred around two relevant proposals under discussion in the Council. e first one was the Commission proposal for a framework decision on data protection in the third pillar, on which the EDPS issued an opinion on 19 December 2005.
Leta 2006 je bila pozornost večidel namenjena dvema pomembnima predlogoma, o katerih je razpravljal Svet. Pri prvem gre za predlog okvirnega sklepa, ki ga je pripravila Komisija o varstvu podatkov v okviru tretjega stebra; ENVP je mnenje o njem izdal 19. decembra 2005.
On 24 January 2006, the Conference of European Data Protection Authorities also adopted an opinion, which was consistent with the EDPS opinion. e second proposal was the Commission proposal for a framework decision on the exchange
Dne 24. januarja 2006 je ustrezno mnenje – to se je skladalo z mnenjem ENVP – sprejela tudi Konferenca evropskih organov za varstvo podatkov. Pri drugem predlogu pa gre za predlog okvirnega sklepa, ki ga je
137–142 (in Polish).
137–142 (v poljščini).
Also available at the EDPS website (on 12 May): http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/lang/en/pid/23
Dostopno tudi na spletnem mestu ENVP (12. maja): http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/lang/en/pid/23
Schengen and Europol ence had already pointed in 2005, the existing legal instruments applicable in the EU on data protection were too general to provide effective data protection in the field of law enforcement.
Schengen in Europol leta 2005 opozorila na dejstvo, da so obstoječi pravni instrumenti o varstvu podatkov, ki se uporabljajo v EU, presplošni, da bi lahko zagotavljali dejansko zaščito podatkov na področju kazenskega pregona.
e cooperation of the EDPS with the JSA Schengen resulted in January 2006 in a model for ‘coordinated’ supervision of SIS II. is model has now been laid down in Articles 44 to 46 of Regulation (EC) No 1987/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on the establishment, operation and use of the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (61).
Iz sodelovanja ENVP s schengenskim Skupnim nadzornim organom je januarja 2006 izšel vzorec za „usklajeni“ nadzor nad SIS II. Ta vzorec je sedaj opredeljen v členih 44 do 46 Uredbe (ES) 1987/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi, delovanju in uporabi druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II)(61).
erefore, the conference welcomed the proposal of the Commission to harmonise and strengthen data protection for activities of police and judicial authorities through the establishment of data protection safeguards for the third pillar, that are to be applied when exchanging information under the principle of availability.
Zato je Konferenca pozdravila predlog Komisije o uskladitvi in okrepitvi varstva podatkov pri delu policije in pravosodja, in sicer z uvedbo zaščitnih ukrepov pri varstvu podatkov v okviru tretjega stebra, ki bi jih bilo treba uporabljati pri izmenjavi informacij na podlagi načela dostopnosti.
It also stressed that there is no alternative to creating a high and harmonised data protection standard in the EU third pillar. is is a consequence of the Hague programme, according to which the safeguarding of freedom, security and justice are indivisible elements of the European Union as a whole (58).
Prav tako je poudarila, da visokih in usklajenih standardov za varstvo podatkov v okviru tretjega stebra EU ni mogoče nadomestiti z ničemer. To izhaja iz Haaškega programa, po katerem je varovanje svobode, varnosti in pravice neločljivo povezano z Evropsko unijo kot celoto(58).
On 26 June 2006, the JSB Europol issued an opinion with respect to the proposal for a Council decision concerning access for consultation of the Visa Information System (VIS) by authorities of Member States responsible for internal security and by Europol for the purposes of the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist and other serious criminal offences. is opinion highlights a number of points, which were also raised in the EDPS opinion of 20 January 2006 (see paragraph 3.3.3), but focuses more on the position of Europol.
Schengenski Skupni nadzorni organ je 26. junija 2006 izdal mnenje o predlogu sklepa Sveta o dostopu organov držav članic, odgovornih za notranjo varnost, in Europola do Vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS) za iskanje podatkov v namen preprečevanja, odkrivanja in preiskovanja terorističnih dejanj in drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj.
e EDPS also benefited from a close cooperation with the JSB Europol and the Data Protection Secretariat in the analysis of a draft proposal for a Council decision establishing the European Police Office (Europol), adopted by the Commission in December 2006. is proposal aims to provide Europol with a new and more
V tem mnenju je izpostavljenih več točk, na katere je opozoril tudi ENVP v svojem mnenju z dne 20. januarja 2006 (glej 3.3.3), vendar je tu večji poudarek na stališču Europola.
However, it appeared that this approach was not shared by all Member States (59).
Vendar pa ni bilo videti, da bi bilo to stališče vseh držav članic(59).
As a result, the progress in Council on the required data protection framework for the third pillar has been unsatisfactory, in spite of the efforts of consecutive presidencies.
Zaradi tega napredek, ki je bil v okviru Sveta dosežen v zvezi s potrebnim okvirom za varstvo podatkov, kljub prizadevanjem več zaporednih predsedstev ni zadovoljiv.
At the same time, initiatives to promote and facilitate exchange of information have progressed well (60).
Obenem pa so pobude za širšo in lažjo izmenjavo informacij dobro napredovale(60).
On 29 November 2006, the EDPS issued a second opinion on the data protection framework, warning the Council not to lower EU citizens’ rights in third pillar data protection (see paragraph 3.3).
Dne 29. novembra 2006 je ENVP izdal še drugo mnenje o okviru za varstvo podatkov in v njem Svet pozval, naj ne omejuje pravic državljanov EU v zvezi z varstvom podatkov v okviru tretjega stebra (glej odstavek 3.3).
f l flexible legal basis in EU law and to replace the exist- ing Europol Convention.
Namen tega predloga je Europolu priskrbeti novo in prožnejšo pravno podlago v okviru prava EU in nadomestiti obstoječo Konvencijo o Europolu.
On 16 February 2007, the EDPS delivered an opinion on this proposal.
ENVP je 16. februarja 2007 izdal mnenje o tem predlogu.
In Budapest, it was also decided to entrust the Police Working Party, supported by the Data Protection Secretariat, with the task of studying a number of issues and to report to the next spring conference. is involved different issues relating to the scope and implications of the principle of availability, as well as the need for additional safeguards.
Prav tako je bilo v Budimpešti sklenjeno, da se preučitev več vprašanj in ustrezno poročanje za naslednjo spomladansko konferenco poveri delovni skupini za policijo, ki ji bo pomagal sekretariat za varstvo podatkov. Pri teh vprašanjih gre med drugim za obseg in posledice načela dostopnosti, pa tudi za vprašanje, ali so potrebni dodatni zaščitni ukrepi.
It also required the development of proposals to further harmonise the practice in the different Member States concerning the right of access.
Postavljena je bila tudi zahteva, da se pripravijo predlogi za nadaljnjo uskladitev praks posameznih držav članic, kar zadeva pravico do dostopa.
(61) See also paragraph 3.4 of this annual report.(62) See: ‘Adequate protection’ — Opinion 6/99 of the Article 29 Working Party revisited, published in: Tízéves az Adatvédelmi Biztos Irodája / Ten years of the DP and FOI Commissioner’s Office, Budapest 2006, pp. 79–87 (in Hungarian) and pp. 251–259 (in English).
) To sporočilo je bilo vključeno tudi v izjavo evropskih organov za varstvo podatkov, ki je bila sprejeta 2. novembra 2006 v Londonu. Obe izjavi sta dostopni na spletnem mestu ENVP: http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/lang/en/pid/51) Glej tudi: House of Lords, European Union Committee: Behind Closed Doors: the meeting of the G6 Interior Ministers at Heiligendamm, Report with Evidence.
See also initiatives of the German presidency to transpose the Prüm Treaty into the legal framework of the EU, which will be analysed by the EDPS in 2007.
Glej tudi pobude nemškega predsedstva za prenos Prümske pogodbe v pravni okvir EU, ki jih bo ENVP preučil v letu 2007.
Mr András Baka, Hungarian judge at the European Court of Human Rights, made introductory remarks about the Court’s case-law on data protection and freedom of information.
Baka, madžarski sodnik Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, je povedal nekaj uvodnih besed o sodni praksi tega sodišča, ki zadeva varstvo podatkov in prost dostop do informacij.
e ‘surveillance society’ is already with us.
Družba nadzorovanja že obstaja.
Surveillance involves the purposeful, routine and systematic recording by technology of individuals’ movements and activities in public and private spaces. ere are already many examples of this in everyday life.
Nadzorovanje pomeni namensko, rutinsko in sistematično popisovanje premikov ter delovanja posameznikov v javnosti in zasebnosti. V vsakdanjem življenju je takšnih primerov že veliko.
Surveillance activities can be well-intentioned and bring benefits.
Nadzorovanje je lahko dobronamerno in koristno.
So far the expansion of these activities has developed in relatively benign and piecemeal ways in democratic societies — not because governments or businesses necessarily wish to intrude into the lives of individuals in an unwarranted way.
Dosedanji razmah teh dejavnosti je bil v demokratičnih družbah sorazmerno neboleč in nesistematičen – ne nujno zato, ker bi oblasti ali podjetja neupravičeno želela vdirati v življenja posameznikov.
e EDPS specifically contributed to the session focusing on ‘Data protection in the third pillar’. e Assistant Supervisor spoke at the session on ‘Whistleblowing and integrity lines’, drawing from experience in EU institutions and OLAF in particular.
ENVP je prispeval zlasti k seji na temo „Varstvo podatkov v okviru tretjega stebra“. Pomočnik nadzornika je nastopil na seji o „prijavljanju nepravilnosti in mejah integritete“ in pri tem črpal zlasti iz izkušenj iz institucij EU in OLAF.
Other subjects dealt with at the conference were: ‘RFID and geo-localisation’, ‘Historical and scientific research’, ‘National health databases’, ‘Genetic data’, and ‘Effectiveness of Commissioners’. e conference also adopted a number of important documents (see paragraph 4.4).
Na konferenci so bile obravnavane tudi naslednje teme: „RDIF in ugotavljanje geografskega položaja“, „Zgodovinske in znanstvene raziskave“, „Nacionalne zdravstvene zbirke podatkov“, „Genski podatki“ in „Učinkovitost pooblaščencev“. Konferenca je sprejela več pomembnih dokumentov (glej odstavek 4.4).
• e next European conference will be held in Larnaka (Cyprus) on 10 and 11 May 2007, and will take stock of relevant issues requiring attention.
Naslednja evropska konferenca bo potekala 10. in 11. maja 2007 v Larnaki (Ciper); na njej bodo pregledana vprašanja, ki terjajo ustrezno pozornost.
Excessive surveillance also impacts on the very nature of society.
Čezmerno nadzorovanje prav tako vpliva na sam značaj družbe.
Data protection authorities and privacy commissioners from Europe and other parts of the world, including Canada, Latin America, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Japan and other jurisdictions in the Asia-Pacifi c region, have met annually for a conference in the autumn for many years. e 28th International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners took place in London on 2 and 3 November 2006 and was attended by delegates from 58 countries around the world.
Organi za varstvo podatkov in pooblaščenci za področje zasebnosti iz Evrope in drugih delov sveta, med drugim iz Kanade, Latinske Amerike, Avstralije, Nove Zelandije, Hong Konga, Japonske in drugih jurisdikcij z azijsko-pacifiškega območja, se že vrsto let srečujejo na letnih jesenskih konferencah.
Such assessments would include but be wider than privacy impact assessments, identifying social impact and opportunities for minimising undesirable consequences for individuals and society.
V Londonu je 2. in 3. novembra 2006 potekala 28. mednarodna konferenca pooblaščencev za varstvo podatkov in področje zasebnosti, ki so se je udeležili delegati iz 58 držav z vsega sveta.
Engagement should be a common cause for all who are concerned about these developments.
Sistematično uporabo ocene vplivov bi bilo treba prilagoditi.
Commissioners should work alongside civil society organisations and governments, private sector, elected representatives and individuals themselves to guard against unwarranted consequences.
Takšne ocene bi sicer vključevale oceno vplivov na zasebnost, hkrati pa bi bile zastavljene širše; v njih bi bili opisani vplivi na družbo in možnosti za omejitev njihovih neželenih posledic za posameznike in družbo na najmanjšo možno mero.
Public trust and confidence is paramount.
Prizadevanja bi morala biti skupna vsem tistim, ki jim ob takšnem razvoju dogodkov ni vseeno.
Although much of the infrastructure of the surveillance society has been assembled for benign purposes, continued public trust cannot be taken for granted. Individuals must feel confident that any intrusion
Pooblaščenci bi si morali skupaj z organizacijami civilne družbe in vlado, zasebnim sektorjem, izvoljenimi predstavniki in posamezniki samimi, prizadevati zoper neupravičene posledice.
into their lives is for necessary and proportionate purposes.
ENVP je odločen ta proces razvijati dalje.
e EDPS is committed to bringing this process forward. is was the background for his cooperation in the ‘London Initiative’ — ‘Communicating data protection and making it more effective’ — discussed in paragraph 5.1.
Zaupanje javnosti je izjemno velikega pomena. Čeprav se infrastruktura družbe nadzorovanja večidel vzpostavlja z dobrimi nameni, zaupanja javnosti ni mogoče šteti za nekaj samo po sebi umevnega.
e next international conference will be held in Montreal from 26 to 28 September 2007 under the title ‘Privacy horizons: terra incognita’.
Naslednja mednarodna konferenca bo potekala od 26. do 28. septembra 2007 v Montrealu z naslovom „Obzorja zasebnosti: terra incognita“.
In many f i fields of life, at home, at work, when shopping, using
Pri zasebnosti in osebnih podatkih gre za ljudi.
Privacy and personal data protection are about people. e perception of what these rights constitute may differ from one person to another as the notions are intrinsically linked to the type of society we live in — each with its own history and culture — and to everyone’s personal experience in life.
Pogledi na to, kaj zadevne pravice pomenijo, se od osebe do osebe lahko razlikujejo, saj so ti pojmi nujno povezani z vrsto družbe, v kateri nekdo živi – vsaka ima svojo zgodovino in kulturo – in z njegovo osebno življenjsko izkušnjo.
Yet, everyone has the same fundamental rights and these rights impose certain conditions (64) that political representatives and policymakers are obliged to respect when adopting or proposing new measures that have an impact on private life, or on the way in which personal data are collected and used.
Vseeno pa ima vsakdo iste temeljne pravice in te pravice političnim predstavnikom in oblikovalcem politik nalagajo določene pogoje(64), ki jih morajo ti pri sprejemanju ali pri predlogih novih ukrepov, ki vplivajo na zasebno življenje ali na način zbiranja in uporabe osebnih podatkov, spoštovati.
It is thus of vital importance that policymakers are aware of the implications and their margins of manoeuvre.
Zato je bistvenega pomena, da se oblikovalci politik zavedajo posledic in meja njihovega manevrskega prostora.
a mobile phone or surfing on the web, most people collect and share information, and leave a wealth of personal traces behind.
V družbi, ki je vse bolj odvisna od uporabe informacij in komunikacijskih tehnologij, je to zelo pomembno.
Yet, many find it difficult to see how this relates, in practical terms, to the need for continued protection of their privacy and personal information, and most of all, what this means for their own daily life. is is where communication plays a crucial role, as a powerful means of raising awareness and informing individuals on how to deal with this reality in a responsible way and make the best possible use of their rights. is is, in short, often referred to as ‘empowerment’.
Na mnogih življenjskih področjih, doma, na delovnem mestu, pri nakupovanju, ob uporabi mobilnih telefonov ali brskanju po svetovnem spletu ljudje zbirajo in izmenjujejo informacije in pri tem za seboj puščajo veliko število osebnih sledi. Vseeno pa mnogi ne razumejo tako zlahka, kaj ima vse to v praksi opraviti s potrebo po stalnem varstvu njihove zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov, in zlasti, kaj vse to pomeni za njihov vsakdan.
At the 28th International Conference (66) of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners in London, a statement (67) was presented, entitled ‘Communicating data protection and making it more effective’, which received general support from data protection authorities around the world. is was a joint initiative of the president of the French data protection authority, the UK Information Commissioner and the EDPS (now also referred to as ‘London Initiative’).
) pooblaščencev za varstvo podatkov in področje zasebnosti, ki je potekala v Londonu, je bila podana izjava(67) z naslovom „Komuniciranje o varstvu podatkov in vprašanje njegove večje učinkovitosti“ (Communicating Data Protection and Making It More Effective), ki je bila deležna splošne podpore organov za varstvo podatkov z vsega sveta.
As one of the architects of the initiative, the EDPS will actively contribute to the followup together with national data protection authorities, and share available experience and best practice.
Šlo je za skupno pobudo predsednika francoskega organa za varstvo podatkov, pooblaščenca za informacije iz Združenega kraljestva in ENVP (sedaj jo imenujejo tudi „Londonska pobuda“).
Legal rules on privacy and protection of personal data also provide for specific rights and obligations at a more practical level.
Predpisi o zasebnosti in varstvu osebnih podatkov pa predvidevajo posebne pravice in dolžnosti tudi na bolj praktični ravni.
Data subjects’ rights of access and correction of data, or the rights to object or withhold consent to the processing of personal data, are also relevant for EU institutions and bodies.
Pravice posameznikov, na katere se osebni podatki nanašajo, do dostopa in popravkov podatkov, ali pravice do ugovora in umika privolitve v obdelovanje osebnih podatkov so pomembne tudi za institucije in organe EU.
So are obligations to ensure that personal data are only processed for legitimate purposes and on lawful grounds, that adequate transparency is provided to data subjects and that sufficient security measures apply.
Podobno velja tudi za obveznost zagotavljanja, da se osebni podatki obdelujejo le v legitimne namene in na zakoniti podlagi, ter zagotavljanja, da imajo posamezniki, na katere se podatki nanašajo, ustrezen pregled nad postopki in da se uporabljajo zadostni varnostni ukrepi.
It is therefore also of vital importance that all parties involved are aware of their rights and obligations, as well of the practical relevance of these rights and obligations in various situations which are important for them.
Zato je bistvenega pomena, da se vse stranke zavedajo svojih pravic in dolžnosti, prav tako pa tudi praktične teže teh pravic in dolžnosti v različnih zanje pomembnih situacijah.