natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition to the distribution of materials and the organisation of events, 60 projects had close contacts with target groups and/or end-bene«ciaries.Suchcontactshavemainlybeenvisits and discussions with the members of target groups working with the end-bene«ciaries,with the e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h e m s e l v e s a n d a l s o w i t h t a r g e t g r o up s nffo t w o r k i n g d i r e c t l y w i t h e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s s u c h a s n a t i o n a l a uijt h o r i t i e s , ju d i c i a l s t a . a n d Mffe m b e r s o f t h e E u r op e a n P a r l i a mffe n t .
Poleg razdeljevanja gradiv in organizacije prireditev je imelo 60 projektov tesne stike s ciljni-mi skupinami in/ali konｲnimi prejemniki. Ti stiki so bili v glavnem obiski in pogovori s pripad-niki ciljnih skupin, delujoｲih s konｲnimi prejemniki, samimi konｲnimi prejemniki in ciljnimi skupinami, ki niso delovale neposredno s konｲnimi prejemniki, kot npr. nacionalne oblasti, z osebjem v pravosodju in s ｲlani Evropskega parlamenta.
For 49 projects, those contacts took place during the project.
V 49 projektih so ti stiki potekali med projektom.
For nine projects, they took place during and after the project and for two projects, they took place after completion of the project.
V devetih projektih so potekali med projek-tom in po njem, v dveh projektih pa so potekali po dokonｲanem projektu.
Close contacts occurred within the following categories.
Tesni stiki so bili prisotni v teh kategorijah:
E n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s A . e c t e d w o mffe n : 9 p r o j e c t s Y o u n g people: 8 p r o j e c t s C h i l d r e n : 8 projects
‡ Prizadete ™enske: 9 projektov
Target groups‡ Teachers: 17 projects‡ Police and social workers: 13 projects each‡ Educational sta.(educators,parents):12projects
Ciljne skupine‡ Uｲitelji: 17 projektov‡ Policija in socialni delavci: 13 projektov vsaka
‡ Local/national authorities, Members of Parliaments, deputies: 12 projects
‡ Vzgojno-izobra™evalni delavci (vzgojno-izobra™evalno osebje, starþi): 12 projektov
End-bene«ciariesingeneral:5 projects.
‡ Lokalne/nacionalne oblasti, ｲlani parlamentov, namestniki: 12 projektov
‡ Medical sta.,psychologists:8projects‡ NGOs: 8 projects‡ EU authorities, MEPs, politicians: 12 projects‡ Judicial sta.:4projects
‡ Zdravstveni delavci, psihologi: 8 projektov‡ Nevladne organizacije: 8 projektov‡ Oblasti EU, parlamentarci, politiki: 12 projektov‡ Pravosodni delavci: 4 projekti
‡ Other: 14 projects (associations, charities, journalists, practitioners, volunteers, rapporteur for United Nations, experts, trade unions, employers' organisations, representatives of religious communities).
‡ Drugi: 14 projektov (zdru™enja, dobrodelne ustanove, novinarji, praktiki, prostovoljci, poroｲevalci za OZN, izvedenci, sindikati, organizacije delodajalcev, predstavniki verskih skupnosti)
The European label helped some partners to get in close contact with political authorities, as illustrated below.
Evropska oznaka projekta je nekaterim partnerjem pomagala vzpostaviti tesne stike s poli-tiｲnimi oblastmi, kot je prikazano spodaj:
Having the EU as a political backbone opened doors that had been closed for a long time.
Z Evropsko unijo za seboj kot pomembno politiｲno oporo je bilo mogoｲe odpreti vrata, ki so bila dolgo zaprta.
Net-works working in those «eldstookthephenomenonofhatecrimesagainstlesbianwomenandof domestic violence more seriously.
Mre™e, delujoｲe na teh podroｲjih, so zaｲele resneje obravnavati pojav kriminalnih dejanj, naperjenih zoper lezbiｲno usmerjene ™enske, in nasilje v dru™ini.
Still it was di/culttoovercomethe`friendly'listeningandgetting them into action.
Kljub temu je bilo te™avno premagati zgolj ¶naklonjenoƒ posluþanje in jih pripraviti k ukrepanju.
However, «nallytheydidlisten.
Nazadnje so vendarle prisluhnili.
Dissemination activities were mainly carried out during the project.
Dejavnosti razþirjanja so bile v glavnem izvajane med potekom projektov.
Some 88 % of the project coordinators were keen to continue the project after its end but only 11 % received addi-tional funds for dissemination, as illustrated below.
Pribli™no 88 % ko-ordinatorjev projektov si je zelo ™elelo nadaljevati projekt po njegovem izteku, a jih je samo 11 % prejelo dodatna sredstva za razþirjanje, kot je prikazano spodaj:
Grant from Leeds Health Action Zone Community for free dissemination of the video pack to all Leeds primary and secondary schools after the contractual period.
Podpora Health Action Zone Community iz Leedsa za brezplaｲno razdeljevanje videa v vseh osnovnih in srednjih þolah po izteku pogodbenega obdobja.
The Catholic Church funded the production of 2 000 copies of our report in book form.
Katoliþka cerkev je «nanciralaizdelavo2000izvodovnaþegaporoｲilavknji™nivezavi.
Getting funds to continue the Daphne projects after closure is critical.
Pridobivanje sredstev za nadaljevanje projektov Daphne po njihovem izteku je kljuｲnega po-mena.
Daphne funding al-lowed great things to start but there is a general lack of possibilities for follow-up to ensure continuity of project activities as both the EC and local governments refuse to take them in charge.
Financiranje projektov Daphne je omogoｲilo zaｲetek velikih stvari, vendar smo priｲa sploþnemu pomanjkanju mo™nosti za zagotovitev nadaljevalnih dejavnosti projektov, saj pre-vzemanje odgovornosti zanje odklanjajo tako lokalne vlade kot Evropska komisija.
For example, updating a website with information at European level or maintaining a European network of local crisis centres takes time and money.
Posodab-ljanje spletnega mesta z informacijami na evropski ravni ali na primer vzdr™evanje evropske mre™e lokalnih kriznih centrov zahteva ｲas in denar.
Often, local governments refuse to fund such follow-up activity because it is not a local project.
Lokalne vlade pogosto odklonijo «nan-ciranje takih poprojektnih dejavnosti, ker ne gre za lokalne projekte.
On the EC side, Daphne is the only EC programme for such actions but it does not consider continuing to fund ex-penses linked to the updating of a website or the maintaining of a network.
S staliþｲa Evropske ko-misije je Daphne edini program za tovrstne akcije, vendar Komisija ni naklonjena nadaljnjemu kritju stroþkov, ki so povezani s posodabljanjem spletnih mest ali vzdr™evanjem mre™.
One of the most exciting developments among these projects is the innovative ways in which they dealt with some of the critical issues.
Ena najbolj zanimivih razvojnih potez teh projektov so inovativni naｲini, s katerimi se lote-vajo premagovanja nekaterih odloｲilnih vpraþanj.
The results of the Daphne experience ing training modules for trainers on the prevention of violence in children's behaviour, elaborat-ing a research agenda for academics on female genital mutilation, and many others.
Rezultati izkuþenj, pridobljenih v programu Daphne ske listine za telefonsko pomoｲ otrokom (European Charter for Children's Helpline), kartiranja razmer v Evropi v zvezi s posilstvi, do veｲagencijskega programa usposabljanja za delo s povzroｲitelji nasilja v dru™ini ter razvijanja modulov usposabljanja za vodje usposabljanja pri prepreｲevanju nasilja v vedenju otrok, razvijanja naｲrta raziskav o pohabljanju ™enskih spolnih organov za akademike in þe marsikaj.
Some project methods were innovative, such as a pilot training module based on a drama workshop for the self-empowerment of girls and preventing sexual abuse, and a training resource pack to be used within the workplace to increase awareness of domestic violence.
Nekatere metode za izvedbo projektov so bile inovativne, tako npr. pilotski modul za usposabljanje, ki temelji na dramski delavnici za vzpodbujanje oseb-nega samozavedanja pri deklicah in prepreｲevanje spolne zlorabe, ter komplet gradiv za uspo-sabljanje, namenjen uporabi na delovnem mestu in vzpodbujanju ozaveþｲenosti o nasilju v dru™ini.
The multiplier ef-fects of new methodologies, multi-agency cooperation, training programmes, audiovisual and information technology materials and other outcomes/products of some of the projects are far-reaching and impressive.
Veri™ni uｲinki novih metodologij, sodelovanje agencij, programi usposabljanja, avdio-vizualna in informacijsko-tehnoloþka gradiva ter drugi rezultati/izdelki nekaterih projektov so daljnose™ni in vredni obｲudovanja.
The «nalevaluationalsostudiedtheimpactsoftheprogramme.Theyarede«nedashumanand social changes brought about by Daphne or one of its projects.
Ti so de«niranikotobｲeｲloveþkeindru™bene spremembe, do katerih je priþlo s pomoｲjo programa Daphne ali enega njegovih projektov.
These impacts were measured along three axes: impacts on the partners, on the target groups and on the end-bene«ciaries.Furthermore,thefactorsa.ecting,positivelyornegatively,theseimpactswere identi«edinordertoimprovetheunderstandingofthemechanismsleadingtoimpact.
Vplivi so bili merjeni s treh vidikov: vpliv na partnerje, ciljne skupine in na konｲne prejemnike. Nadalje so bili identi«ciranifaktorji,kisopozitivnoalinegativnodelovalinatevplive,dabiizboljþali tudi razumevanje mehanizmov, ki vodijo do teh vplivov.
Impacts on partners
Vplivi na partnerje
The graph below presents the six categories of impact on partners as experienced by them.
Spodnji graf predstavlja þest kategorij vplivov na partnerje, kakor so jih do™ivljali sami
Improved expertise
Veｲja strokovnost
Adoption of good practices
Verodostojnost, doseganje ljudi
Improved credibility and outreach
Zmo™nosti mre™nega povezovanja
Improved networking capacities
Dostop do dodatnih sredstev
Access to additional funding
Sprememba narave dela
Nearly all the projects (97 %) have impacts on the partners.
Na partnerje so vplivali skoraj vsi projekti (97 %).
`Improved expertise' is linked to gains in understanding or new understanding of the issue of vio-lence, learning from the experience of other partners and target groups, improved skills/perform-ance and increased knowledge of how an issue is addressed across Europe.
¶Izboljþana strokovnostƒ je povezana z veｲjim razumevanjem ali novim razumevanjem pro-blematike nasilja, uｲenjem iz izkuþenj drugih partnerjev in ciljnih skupin, izboljþanjem znanj/storilnosti in veｲjega znanja o tem, kako je katero vpraþanje obravnavano po Evropi.
Improved expertise must be linked to the transnational character of the partnerships, allowing partners to work and exchange knowledge with complementary partners with a high level of expertise.
Izboljþa-no strokovno znanje mora biti povezano z nadnacionalnim znaｲajem partnerstev in omogo-ｲati partnerjem, da delajo in izmenjujejo znanje s partnerji, ki jih dopolnjujejo, na visoki stro-kovni ravni.
For 76 % of the partners, it was the « r s t t i mffe t h e y p a r t i c i p a t e d i n a D a p h n e p r o j e c t : t h i s i s a h i g hp e r c e n t a g e o f ` n e w cffo mffe r s ' , illustrating the pioneering role of Daphne for the partners concerned.
76 % partnerjev je v projektu Daphne sodelovalo prviｲ: odstotek ¶novincevƒ je visok in nazorno ka™e pionirski pomen programa Daphne za zadevne partnerje.
`Adoption of good practices' refers to cases where, due to the project, partners acted di.er-ently in their work, became more professional and adapted good practices to their own use.
¶Sprejetje dobrih praksƒ se nanaþa na primere, kjer partnerji zaradi projekta v svojem delu ravnajo drugaｲe, postali so bolj profesionalni in so dobro prakso prilagodili svoji rabi.
`Change of the nature of work' refers typically to projects with a research component, where the results of the project overturn the previous conception of work.
¶Sprememba narave delaƒ se najbolj nanaþa na projekte z raziskovalno komponento, pri ka-terih dose™ki projekta povsem spremenijo dotedanji koncept dela.
After the project, partners operate di.erentlyduetonewinformationandunderstandingcomingfromtheproject.
Partnerji po projektu de-lujejo drugaｲe zaradi novih informacij in razumevanja, ki izhaja iz projekta.
Factors of impact on the partners(N = 137 projects having mentioned up to three contributing or limiting factors of impact)
(N = 137 projektov, ki so navedli do 3 pozitivne ali omejevalne dejavnike)
Most mentioned
Najveｲkrat navedeno
Contributing factors
Pozitivni dejavniki
Limiting factors
Omejevalni dejavniki
Resources/means allocated to the project: 10 %
Sredstva/viri dodeljeni projektu: 10 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 69 %
Raven strokovnega znanja partnerjev v projektu in njihovo dopolnjevanje: 69 %
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 49 %
Stopnja nadnacionalnosti partnerstva: 49 %
Quality of the outputs: 42 %
Kakovost rezultatov: 42 %
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 3 %
Pasovna ustreznost dejavnosti razþirjanja: 3 %
Adequacy of the project objectives to the context: 31 %
Ustreznost ciljev glede na okvir projekta: 31 %
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 1 %
Stopnja nadnacionalnosti partnerstva: 1 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 24 %
Sredstva/viri dodeljeni projektu: 24 %
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:1%
Stopnja sodelovanja uporabnikov/prejemnikov: 1 %
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 18 %
Stopnja sodelovanja predstavnikov ciljnih skupin: 18 %
Political interest/visibility: 1 %
Sinergije z drugimi projekti in/ali pobudami: 1 %
Other (project duration; for small NGOs, constraints linked to a European project): 1 %
Drugo (trajanje projekta; za male nevladne organizacije, omejitve vezane na evropski projekt): 1 %
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 7 %
Pasovna ustreznost dejavnosti razþirjanja: 7 %
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 7 %
Sinergije z drugimi projekti in/ali pobudami: 7 %
Less mentioned
Manjkrat
The «rsttwocontributingfactorsclearlyemphasisetheneedforacarefullydesignedpartner-ship.
Prva dva pozitivna dejavnika jasno poudarjata potrebo po skrbno naｲrtovanem partnerstvu.
This is con«rmedbytheimportancegiventothelevelofexpertiseofthesepartnersalsoin the limiting factors.
To potrjuje pomembnost, ki jo dajejo ravni znanja teh partnerjev tudi v navajanju omejevalnih dejavnikov.
Therefore this point seems crucial and will be regularly recalled by the Commission in its guidelines: good partnership with appropriate expertise favours the project's achievements but an ill-designed partnership penalises it.
Zato je ta toｲka bistvenega pomena in Komisija bo v svojih smernicah nanjo red-no opozarjala: dobro partnerstvo z ustreznim strokovnim znanjem daje prednost dose™kom projekta, slabo naｲrtovano partnerstvo projekt oþkoduje.
In addition, 10 % of the quotations for limiting factors mention quite logically that the resources allocated to the project are important.
Razen tega 10 % navedb o omeje-valnih dejavnikih povsem razumljivo omenja, da so pomembni viri, ki so dodeljeni projektu.
Impacts on target groups
Vplivi na ciljne skupine
A total of 93 % of the projects present an impact on the target groups.
93 % projektov predstavlja vplive na ciljne skupine.
Increased awareness of issues of violence
Veｲja ozaveþｲenost o nasilju
Increased expertise
Veｲja strokovnost
Changed behaviour regarding protection from violence
Spremenjeno obnaþanje, povezano z prepreｲevanjem nasilja
More willingness/capacity to cooperate
Veｲja pripravljenost/zmo™nost sodelovanja
Increased knowledge of legislative framework
Veｲje poznavanje zakonodajnega okvira
`Increased awareness of issues of violence' results from proper dissemination activities (ma-terials distributed and events organised) towards members of the target groups.
¶Veｲja ozaveþｲenost o nasiljuƒ je rezultat dejavnosti naｲrtovanega razþirjanja (razdeljevanje gradiv in organiziranje dogodkov) pripadnikom ciljnih skupin.
The impact `more willingness/capacity to cooperate' refers to a better implementation of the outputs of the project because the target groups:
Vpliv ¶veｲja pripravljenost/zmo™nost sodelovanjaƒ je povezan z boljþo uporabo rezultatov projekta, ker so ciljne skupine:
‡ are more interested in working together;
‡ bolj zainteresirane za skupno delo;
‡ are more able to work together;
‡ bolj sposobne delati skupaj;
‡ understand each other better.
‡ ena drugo bolje razumejo.
The impact `increased expertise' refers to a better understanding or a new understanding of the issue of violence, exchange of experience and practices with partners and other target groups leading to a more integrated approach on the issue of violence and to an increased knowledge of activities in the sector across Europe.
Vpliv ¶veｲja strokovnostƒ se nanaþa na boljþe razumevanje ali novo razumevanje problemati-ke nasilja, izmenjavo izkuþenj in praks s partnerji in drugimi ciljnimi skupinami, kar vodi k bolj integriranemu pristopu k problematiki nasilja in k veｲjemu poznavanju dejavnosti v tem sek-torju po vsej Evropi.
`Changed behaviour regarding prevention from violence' mostly corresponds to an intention to better focus on actions of prevention, in two ways:
¶Spremenjeno obnaþanje v zvezi s prepreｲevanjem nasiljaƒ se v veliki meri sklada z namenom boljþega osredotoｲanja na dejavnosti prepreｲevanja na dva naｲina:
‡ target groups do more preventing actions than before;
‡ ciljne skupine opravijo veｲ prepreｲevalnih akcij kot pred projektom;
‡ target groups have changed their way of working because they know the problem better and are consequently more able to address it.
‡ ciljne skupine so spremenile svoj naｲin delovanja, ker problem bolje poznajo in so zato bolj usposobljene za njegovo reþevanje. Gonilo je veｲje osredotoｲenje na prepreｲevanje.
They use preventing instead of reporting, counselling or use of social circles.
Pre-preｲevanje uporabljajo namesto prijavljanja, svetovalne pomoｲi ali uporabe dru™benih krogov.
This is typi-cally the case of projects with a research component that has allowed a deeper understand-ing of prevention.
To je najbolj znaｲilno za projekte z raziskovalno komponento, ki je omogoｲila glob-lje razumevanje prepreｲevanja.
Factors of impact on target groups(N = 133 projects having mentioned up to three contributing or limiting factors of impact)
(N = 133 projektov, ki so navedli do 3 pozitivne ali omejevalne dejavnike)
Resources/means allocated to the project: 13 %
Sredstva/viri dodeljeni projektu: 13 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 50 %
Raven strokovnega znanja partnerjev v projektu in njihovo dopolnjevanje: 50 %
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 8 %
Pasovna ustreznost razþirjanja: 8 %
Quality of the outputs: 47 %
Kakovost rezultatov: 47 %
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 34 %
Stopnja sodelovanja predstavnikov ciljnih skupin: 34 %
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 4 %
Stopnja sodelovanja predstavnikov ciljnih skupin: 4 %
Adequacy of the project objectives to the context: 32 %
Ustreznost ciljev glede na okvir projekta: 32 %
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:2%
Stopnja sodelovanja uporabnikov/prejemnikov: 2 %
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 26 %
Stopnja nadnacionalnosti partnerstva: 26 %
Quality of the outputs: 1 %
Kakovost rezultatov: 1 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 25 %
Sredstva/viri dodeljeni projektu: 25 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 1 %
Raven strokovnega znanja partnerjev v projektu in njihovo dopolnjevanje: 1 %
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:21%
Stopnja sodelovanja uporabnikov/prejemnikov: 21 %
Adequacy of the project objectives to the context: 1 %
Ustreznost ciljev glede na okvir projekta: 1 %
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 6 %
Pasovna ustreznost razþirjanja: 6 %
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 4 %
Sinergije z drugimi projekti in/ali pobudami: 4 %
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 1 %
Sinergije z drugimi projekti in/ali pobudami: 1 %
Other (new topic of great interest): 1 %
Drugo (nova tema, ki vas zanima): 1 %
Here again, there is an important factor that can both favour or penalise the project: this is the degree of involvement of representatives of the target groups.
Tudi tu je pomemben dejavnik, ki lahko koristi ali þkoduje projektu, stopnja sodelovanja pred-stavnikov ciljnih skupin.
There is room for another piece of advice to future projects: an adequate involvement of the target groups, be it during design, implementation or dissemination phases. `Quality of the output' is another important factor contributing to a good impact.
Nasvet za izboljþanje prihodnjih projektov v tem pogledu: ustrezno sodelovanje ciljnih skupin med naｲrtovanjem, izvajanjem ali v fazi razþirjanja projekta. ¶Kako-vost razultatovƒ je dodaten pomemben dejavnik, ki prispeva k dobremu vplivu.
Impacts on end-bene«ciaries
Vplivi na konｲne prejemnike
Four projects out of «ve(79%)haveimpactsonend-bene«ciaries.Thefollowinggraphillus-trates the frequencies of the ways these bene«ciariesarea.ected.
Na konｲne prejemnike vplivajo þtirje projekti od petih (79 %). Naslednji graf nazorno ka™e po-gostnost naｲinov vplivanja na prejemnike.
Increased awareness of their situation
Veｲja ozaveþｲenost za osebni polo™aj
Improved means of tackling their situations
Izboljþano reþevanje polo™aja oseb
Improved access to assistance
Izboljþan dostop do pomoｲi
Improving their skills
Izboljþevanje znanja
Promoting their inclusion in society
Spodbujanje vkljuｲevanja v dru™bo
`Increased awareness' is the result of dissemination activities, contacts with representatives of target groups and/or direct involvement in partnerships.
¶Veｲja ozaveþｲenostƒ je rezultat dejavnosti razþirjanja, stikov s predstavniki ciljnih skupin in/ali neposrednega sodelovanja v partnerstvih.
In some projects, end-bene«ciar-ies did not even know before the project about their rights and existing services, as illustrated below.
Kot je prikazano spodaj, konｲni prejemniki v ne-katerih projektih dotlej sploh niso vedeli za svoje pravice in obstojeｲe storitve:
The information campaign broadly touched public opinion.
Kampanja za informiranje se je þirþe dotaknila javnega mnenja.
For many it was the «rsttimetheyhad information on the issue of violence against children.
Za mnoge je bilo to prviｲ, da so bili seznanjeni s problematiko nasilja nad otroki.
There has been a broad dissemination of the SOS helpline.
Vzpostavljena je bila þiroka mre™a telefonskih linij za hitro pomoｲ.
In the pilot phase, there were six cases of abuse revealed in « v e a r e a s o f T h e s - s a l o n i k i .
V pilotni fazi je bilo na 5 obmoｲjih Soluna razkritih 6 primerov zlorab.
The impact `Improved access to assistance' covers cases in which end-bene«ciariesreachmembers of the target groups better (also linked to the fact that target groups are more ac-cessible and more able to identify cases of violence) or are more able to access assistance (they know better who to call).
Vpliv ¶izboljþanega dostopa do pomoｲiƒ zajema primere, v katerih konｲni prejemniki la™je dose™ejo ｲlane ciljnih skupin (kar je povezano tudi z dejstvom, da so ciljne skupine bolj do-segljive in bolj usposobljene za prepoznavanje primerov nasilja) oziroma la™je pridejo do po-moｲi (ker vedo, kam se morajo obrniti).
Such an impact is more frequent in projects coordinated by an NGO than in projects coordinated by any other type of organisation: 67 % compared with 39 % respectively.
Tak vpliv je pogostejþi v projektih, ki jih koordinirajo nevladne organizacije, kot v projektih, ki jih koordinirajo drugaｲne organizacije: NVO 67 % v primerjavi z 39 % drugih organizacij.
In fact, NGOs play an important role in guiding end-bene«ciariestowardsade-quate assistance services and in interfacing with providers of services and end-bene«ciar-ies.
NVO so dejansko imele pomembno vlogo v vodenju konｲnih prejemnikov k primernim storitvam pomoｲi in v povezovanju s ponudniki storitev in konｲnimi prejemniki.
The impact `Improved means of tackling their situations' refers to the case when a potential victim is better positioned to address his/her own situation.
Vpliv ¶izboljþana sredstva za reþevanje njihovega polo™ajaƒ se nanaþa na primere, ko ima po-tencialna ™rtev boljþe mo™nosti za reþevanje svojih razmer. Tak boljþi polo™aj je rezultat:
‡ better tools, e.g. a contact telephone number;
‡ boljþih pripomoｲkov, npr. kontaktne telefonske þtevilke;