natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The EU responds to this with its motto, “unity in diversity,” defined in the preamble of the Treaty of the EU as “desiring to deepen the solidarity between their peoples while respecting their history, their culture and their traditions.”
Bela knjiga Sveta Evrope o medkulturnem dialogu nadaljuje to idejo in izpostavlja njeno pomembnost pri integraciji priseljencev in evropski integraciji: „Pomanjkanje dialoga ne upošteva naukov, ki izhajajo iz kulturne in politične dediščine Evrope.
The Council of Europe’s White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue picks up this idea and makes it as relevant for immigrant integration as it is for European integration ; “An absence of dialogue does not take account of the lessons of Europe’s cultural and political heritage.
Evropska zgodovina je bila miroljubna in ustvarjalna, vsakokrat ko je z resnično odločnostjo izbrala dialog s sosedi in sodelovala pri preseganju medsebojnih razlik.
European history has been peaceful and productive whenever a real determination prevailed to speak to our neighbour and to cooperate across dividing lines… Only dialogue allows people to live in unity in diversity.”
Samo dialog omogoča življenje v enotnosti in raznolikosti.“
More ideas and examples of intercultural dialogue and platform practices can be found in :
Več zamisli in primerov prakse na področju medkulturnega dialoga in platform najdete v naslednjih objavah:
The activities of the 2008 European Year of Intercultural Dialogue : www.interculturaldialogue2008.eu
Dejavnosti v okviru evropskega leta medkulturnega dialoga 2008: http://www.interculturaldialogue2008.eu
The legal framework as facilitator of dialogue
Pravni okvir kot povezovalec dialoga
A dialogue platform can be situated in a particular context : in the workplace, school, cultural realm, public services, religious life, neighbourhood relations, foreign affairs, and so on.
Platforma za dialog je lahko postavljena v določen okvir: delovno mesto, šola, kulturno področje, javne storitve, versko življenje, sosedski odnosi, zunanje zadeve itd.
Each has its own opportunities for exchanging views and making decisions together.
Vsak okvir ponuja priložnosti za izmenjavo stališč in skupno sprejemanje odločitev.
Policy-makers should ensure that citizens and third-country nationals have similar opportunities for participation in these contexts.
Oblikovalci politik morajo državljanom tretjih držav in drugim državljanom zagotoviti podobne možnosti udeležbe v teh okvirih.
Depending on the available
Te politike vodijo k izbiri različnih predstavnikov in drugih akterjev, ki bodo nato sodelovali v platformah.
In 2006, the Czech Ministry of the Interior adopted a more inclusive interpretation of Act 83/1990 so that any physical person—not just citizens—can form an association.
Leta 2006 je češko Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve sprejelo bolj vključujočo razlago zakona 83/1990, tako da vse fizične osebe, ne le državljani, lahko ustanovijo združenja.
Before, non-nationals could only do so if they involved at least three Czech nationals.In Spain, the Constitutional Court stated in its decision Nr. 236/2007 that there are certain fundamental rights which pertain to every person, regardless of administrative status, among which are the rights to association, reunion, demonstration and education.In Austria, the 2006 Act on the Chamber of Labour and the Act of Institutional Settings at the Workplace extended to all third-country national workers the right to stand for elections as shop-stewards (a union member who represents their co-workers in dealings with management) and as delegates to the Chamber of Labour (a platform representing all private employees).
Špansko ustavno sodišče je v svoji Odločbi št. 236/2007 navedlo, da obstajajo določene temeljne pravice, ki pripadajo vsakemu posamezniku, ne glede na njegov upravni status, mednje pa spada pravica do združevanja, ponovne združitve, demonstracije in izobraževanja.
The national programmes of the European Fund for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals can be used to fund the development of national, regional, and local consultative bodies and capacity-building programmes for third-country nationals and their associations to participate in the democratic process.
Nacionalni programi Evropskega sklada za vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav se lahko uporabijo za financiranje razvoja nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih posvetovalnih teles ter programov, namenjenih krepitvi sposobnosti državljanov tretjih držav in njihovih združenj za sodelovanje v demokratičnem procesu.
A national or local authority who has demonstrated openness to structural, ongoing consultation and built up trust and understanding can use these skills to moderate a new dialogue platform and progress on to more sensitive topics.
Nacionalni ali lokalni organ, ki je pokazal odprtost za stalno strukturno posvetovanje ter vzpostavil zaupanje in razumevanje, lahko te spretnosti uporabi za moderiranje nove platforme za dialog in prehod na obravnavo občutljivejših tem.
Removing barriers in the legal framework to immigrant civic participation creates opportunities for the development of civil society and consultative bodies, who will later be key participants in a dialogue platform.
Odstranjevanje ovir v pravnem okviru za civilno udeležbo priseljencev ustvarja priložnosti za razvoj civilne družbe in posvetovalnih teles, ki bodo pozneje ključni udeleženci v platformi za dialog.
The Council for Ethnic Minorities in Denmark is the national consultative body, composed of locally elected integration councils.
Svet za etnične manjšine na Danskem (Rådet for Etniske Minoriteter) je nacionalno posvetovalno telo, sestavljeno iz lokalno izvoljenih svetov za integracijo.
When a TV investigation found that local councils received low satisfaction ratings from its members and little trust from local politicians, the Council used its existing structure to facilitate five regional dialogue platforms on how best to conduct dialogue in the future.
Ko je bilo v okviru raziskovalne televizijske oddaje ugotovljeno, da lokalni sveti dobivajo nizke ocene glede zadovoljstva svojih članov in uživajo nizko stopnjo zaupanja lokalnih politikov, je svet izkoristil svojo obstoječo strukturo in spodbudil pet regionalnih platform k dialogu o tem, kako najbolje voditi dialog v prihodnje.
The local council members acted as key facilitators who could mobilise trans-ethnic networks and bring in municipality and media participants.
Člani lokalnih svetov so delovali kot ključni povezovalci, ki jim je uspelo mobilizirati transetnične mreže in kot udeležence vključiti občino in medije.
The Minderheden Forum is an independent umbrella organisation of 15 federations of over 1,000 local migrant organisations in Flanders and Brussels.
zunanje sodelovanje pri novih dialogih z vlado in oblikovanju agende.
Internally, it hosts working groups and platforms for its members.
Forum interno gosti delovne skupine in platforme za svoje člane.
Government has a “short-cut” to various minority groups without running the risk of selecting one as the “arbitrary spokesmen.”
Vlada ima tako „bližnjico“ do različnih manjšinskih skupin brez tveganja, da eno skupino izbere kot „govornika v imenu vseh“.
Members can speak up through the Forum and use its structures to build their organisation’s capacity.
Člani lahko s forumom izražajo svoja mnenja in uporabijo njegove strukture za krepitev sposobnosti svoje organizacije.
Focus on a specific problem based on a community’s needs
Osredotočenje na posebno težavo na podlagi potreb skupnosti
Platforms should avoid a broad scope covering the entire concept of integration and, instead, opt for a focus on specific needs and issues, for instance on health, employment, education, harassment, and so on.
Za platforme je priporočljivo, da ne obravnavajo širokega področja, ki pokriva celoten koncept integracije, temveč se raje osredotočijo na posebne potrebe in vprašanja, na primer zdravstvo, zaposlovanje, izobraževanje, trpinčenje ipd.
A needs-based platform is based on the problems that are most relevant for a specific area—immigrants and natives alike.
Platforma, ki temelji na potrebah, obravnava najbolj pereče težave na določenem področju, ki tarejo priseljence in domačine.
Refocusing on needs and issues as the common point of reference can steer clear of sometimes unnecessary distinctions made on the basis, for instance, of different communities.
Če se preusmerimo na potrebe in vprašanja kot skupno stično točko, se lahko izognemo včasih nepotrebnim razlikam, ki jih na primer izpostavljajo različne skupnosti.
Critical to the success of a needs-based platform on a specific integration issue is listening to the host and migrant communities. Listening takes place not only in the design phase but throughout its implementation.
Pri posebnem vprašanju integracije je bistvenega pomena za uspeh platforme, ki temelji na potrebah, da prisluhnemo gostiteljski in priseljenskim skupnostim, in sicer ne samo v fazi oblikovanja, temveč tudi v celotni fazi izvajanja.
This requires a significant and dedicated period of time for consultation, response, and feedback.
To zahteva, da se veliko časa nameni posvetovanju, odgovorom in povratnim informacijam.
The need for a platform is assessed by asking the affected community to identify their key problems ; whether they think others know of their problem ; and whether they trust others to cooperate with them to solve it.
Potreba po platformi se ovrednoti tako, da se prizadeta skupnost povabi, naj opredeli svoje ključne težave ter pove, ali meni, da so drugi s to težavo seznanjeni, in ali drugim toliko zaupa, da bi z njimi sodelovala pri njenem reševanju.
The Refugee & Migrant Forum Manchester seeks to empower refugees and asylum seekers to express their specific needs and aspirations to inform local and national decision-making. It builds respect and cooperation among Manchester’s refugee and migrant population and provides a space for sharing skills, information, and resources. The Forum was launched in 2006 on the basis of the Refugee Charter for Manchester, a statement of rights and responsibilities written by refugees and asylum seekers and endorsed by 100 policy and opinion-makers in Manchester, including the City Council. www.mrsn.org.uk/forum
Manchestrski forum za begunce in migrante (Refugee & Migrant Forum Manchester) poskuša krepiti moč beguncev in prosilcev za azil tako, da jim pomaga izraziti njihove specifične potrebe in želje, ki se posredujejo oblikovalcem odločitev na lokalni in nacionalni ravni. Forum krepi spoštovanje in sodelovanje med begunskimi in priseljenskimi prebivalci v Manchestru ter omogoča prostor za izmenjavo spretnosti, informacij in sredstev. Ustanovljen je bil leta 2006 na podlagi Listine o beguncih za Manchester (Refugee Charter for Manchester), izjave o pravicah in obveznostih, ki so jo sestavili begunci in prosilci za azil, potrdilo pa jo je sto oblikovalcev politik in mnenja iz Manchestra, tudi mestni svet. http://www.mrsn.org.uk/forum
A process of consultation prior to the establishment of a platform reveals what key issues are creating the differences of opinion and suspicion which are frustrating community cooperation.
Posvetovalni proces pred vzpostavitvijo platforme lahko razkrije, katere ključne zadeve ustvarjajo razlike v mnenjih in vzbujajo sumničenja, ki preprečujejo sodelovanje v skupnosti.
This involves outreach to trans-ethnic networks, roles for independent facilitators, and linking up with new technologies to support ongoing dialogue outside the platform.
To vključuje obveščanje transetničnih mrež, vloge za neodvisne povezovalce in uporabo novih tehnologij v podporo stalnemu dialogu, ki se vodi zunaj platforme.
The ‘New Neighbours Framework Programme’ is a Barcelona municipal platform of service providers, public authorities, and NGOs working on facilitating family reunion.
„Okvirni program za nove sosede“ (New Neighbours Framework Programme) je občinska platforma v Barceloni, znotraj katere ponudniki storitev, organi javne uprave in nevladne organizacije delajo v smeri olajšanja združitve družin.
The planning phase identified the specific needs and tailored the platform’s focus through a telephone survey with current family reunion applicants, focus groups with past applicants and their families, and meetings with the School Enrolment Office on the difficulties encountered in the educational system.
V načrtovalni fazi so bile opredeljene posebne potrebe, ki so bile prilagojene osrednji temi foruma na podlagi telefonske ankete s trenutnimi prosilci za združitev družine, in organizirane delovne skupine z nekdanjimi prosilci in njihovimi družinami ter srečanja z Uradom za vključitev v šolo na temo težav v izobraževalnem sistemu.
The INTI project ‘Integration Exchange’ led by Quartiers en Crise—European Regeneration Areas Network established eight Local Action Groups of local stakeholders and multilingual online platforms to gather local and regional expertise for transnational peer reviews about local implementation and awareness of the Common Basic Principles.
Projekt v okviru programa INTI, „Integracijska izmenjava“ (Integration Exchange), ki ga je vodila evropska mreža Quartiers en Crise − European Regeneration Areas Network, je vzpostavil osem lokalnih akcijskih skupin z lokalnimi interesnimi skupinami in večjezične spletne platforme zato, da se zbere lokalno in regionalno strokovno znanje za transnacionalne medsebojne preglede lokalnega izvajanja in ozaveščenosti o skupnih osnovnih načelih.
Mutual learning and exchange within the Groups would build capacity and working relationships between the participating public agencies, community-based organisations, local anti-discrimination organisations, employers, trade unions, and researchers.
Medsebojno učenje in izmenjava med skupinami prispevata h krepitvi sposobnosti in delovnih odnosov med sodelujočimi javnimi agencijami, organizacijami v skupnosti, lokalnimi organizacijami za boj proti diskriminaciji, delodajalci, sindikati in raziskovalci.
Needs should be explained in easily understood terms that have the potential to garner broad support from all parties.
Potrebe naj se obrazložijo s preprostimi besedami, ki omogočajo pridobitev široke podpore vseh strani.
Common ground is easier to find when issues are framed in terms of combating social exclusion for various minority groups, or improving working conditions or parent-teacher relationships.
Skupne točke je laže opredeliti, kadar so zadeve postavljene v okvir, na primer, boja proti socialni izključenosti različnih manjšinskih skupin, izboljšanja delovnih razmer ali odnosov med starši in učitelji.
Needs should also be adapted to fit changing circumstances on the ground, which allows for openings in the current political way of thinking.
Prav tako je potrebe treba prilagoditi spreminjajočim se razmeram na terenu, kar prispeva k odprtosti v trenutnem načinu političnega razmišljanja.
Once a platform’s focus is decided, it will be easier for its participants to find common ground if the problem has been framed in inclusive terms that apply to all residents.
Ko je opredeljena osnovna tema platforme, je njenim udeležencem laže najti skupne točke, če je bila težava umeščena v okvir skupnih vprašanj, ki se nanašajo na vse prebivalce.
On the question of who should be the members of a dialogue platform, conveners can either use a democratic approach for electing “representatives” or a more technical approach for selecting “participants.”
Pri vprašanju, kdo naj bo član platforme za dialog, lahko pobudniki platforme bodisi uporabijo demokratični pristop izbire „predstavnikov“ ali bolj tehnični pristop izbire „udeležencev“.
The challenge is choosing the method that is appropriate for the issue at hand, credible in the eyes of the interested parties, and mindful of the asymmetric power dynamics between state authorities, nationals, and non-nationals with limited political opportunities—especially newcomers.
Poseben izziv je izbira metode, ki bi bila primerna za obravnavano temo, verodostojna z vidika zainteresiranih strani in obzirna do asimetrične dinamike moči med državnimi organi in državljani ter nedržavljani z omejenimi političnimi možnostmi, zlasti novimi priseljenci.
The way to make a dialogue platform representative is through a democratic process.
Platforma za dialog lahko postane reprezentativna na podlagi demokratičnega procesa.
This is a procedure that is also followed with the official consultative bodies.
To je postopek, ki mu sledijo tudi uradna posvetovalna telesa.
The local consultative bodies in countries like Austria, Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, Portugal, and Sweden that follow this recommendation can claim that their members are representatives of its third-country national population, in all its diversity.
Lokalna posvetovalna telesa v državah, kot so Avstrija, Danska, Nemčija, Luksemburg, Portugalska in Švedska, ki upoštevajo to priporočilo, lahko potrdijo, da njihovi člani zastopajo populacijo državljanov iz tretjih držav v vsej njeni raznolikosti.
Most dialogue platforms with immigrants in Europe opt for a more technical approach.
Večina platform za dialog s priseljenci v Evropi se odloči za bolj tehničen pristop.
The convenors want the platform to be inclusive of the most relevant and effective participants.
Pobudniki si želijo, da bi platforma vključevala najpomembnejše in najučinkovitejše udeležence.
Relevance is determined by the participant’s expertise on the problem being discussed, their general openness to dialogue and their connectedness.
Pomembnost se opredeli na podlagi strokovnega znanja, ki ga imajo udeleženci o obravnavani težavi, njihove splošne odprtosti za dialog in njihove povezanosti.
Effectiveness is determined by their capacity to act as potential agents of change.
Učinkovitost se opredeli na podlagi njihove sposobnosti delovati kot morebiten sprožitelj sprememb.
With this approach the appropriate question is not whether the resulting platform will be representative, but rather whether it will be inclusive of the most relevant and effective individuals and organisations.
Pri tem pristopu je vprašanje, ki si ga moramo postaviti, ali bo taka platforma vključevala najpomembnejše in najučinkovitejše posameznike in organizacije, ne pa, ali bo ta platforma reprezentativna.
A forum can also have mixed membership.
Članstvo foruma je lahko tudi mešano.
Directly elected representatives bring in the voices of their constituencies and take a lead in dialogue and decision-making, while ad hoc participants bring in their expertise and capacity to promote follow-up actions.
Predstavniki, ki so neposredno izvoljeni, so glasniki svojih volilnih okrožij in pobudniki pri dialogu in sprejemanju odločitev, medtem ko občasni udeleženci prispevajo svoje strokovno znanje in sposobnost za spodbujanje nadaljnjih ukrepov.
Members of a platform are “representatives” when they are freely elected and “participants” when they are selected for their connectedness and effectiveness on the given problem.
Člani določene platforme se imenujejo „predstavniki“, če so svobodno izvoljeni, in „udeleženci“, če so izbrani na podlagi svoje povezanosti in učinkovitosti glede na določeno težavo.
Conveners need to assess whether a democratic or technical approach will be necessary for their platform to be seen as a credible civic space in the eyes of the community.
Pobudniki morajo ovrednotiti, ali bo treba slediti demokratičnemu ali tehničnemu pristopu, da bi bila njihova platforma z vidika skupnosti obravnavana kot verodostojen družbeni prostor.
The participation criteria should be objective, transparent and applied universally to any interested participant.
Merila za udeležbo morajo biti objektivna, pregledna in veljavna za vse zainteresirane udeležence.
The principles of dialogue necessitate that participation is voluntary and non-coercive.
Načela dialoga narekujejo, da je udeležba prostovoljna in neprisilna.
Special appointments or interference by conveners (especially in the case of authorities) are likely to undermine the platforms’ credibility and effectiveness, with its results being seen as biased or rigged to suit certain interests.
Posebna imenovanja ali posegi pobudnikov (zlasti pri organih oblasti) lahko platformi odvzamejo njeno verodostojnost in učinkovitost, posledično pa se njeni rezultati pojmujejo kot pristranski ali prikrojeni določenim interesom.
It may make sense to leave the platform open, dispensing with eligibility criteria and a selection procedure.
Verjetno je smiselno, da se ohrani odprtost platforme in opustijo merila upravičenosti in postopek izbire.
Many platforms are limited to very specific spaces and sectors (i.e. hospital administrators in a certain city) or in time (i.e. one-off, short-term, ad hoc).
Številne platforme so omejene na zelo specifične prostore in sektorje (npr. upravno bolnišnično osebje v določenem mestu) ali časovno opredeljene (npr. enkratne, kratkoročne, začasne).
The most relevant participants will self-select based on the platform’s scope and objectives.
Najpomembnejši udeleženci bodo izbiro opravili sami glede na področje uporabe in cilje platforme.
The NGO Platform on EU Asylum and Migration Policy is open to all Brussels-based NGOs with a European network active in the debate on asylum, refugee, and migration policy development in the EU.
„Platforma nevladnih organizacij o azilni in migrantski politiki EU“ (NGO Platform on EU Asylum and Migration Policy) je odprta vsem nevladnim organizacijam s sedežem v Bruslju, ki v aktivni evropski mreži vodijo razprave o razvoju azilnih, begunskih in priseljenskih politik v Evropski uniji.
It was created at the initiative of UNHCR, Amnesty International and the Churches’ Commission for Migrants in Europe and acts as an open, informal, and politically neutral space for the exchange of information on diverse areas of expertise as well as coordination of advocacy strategies and work with national member organisations focusing on refugees, asylum seekers, or migrant communities or in countries of origin.
Ustanovljena je bila na pobudo UNHCR, Amnesty International in komisije cerkev za priseljence v Evropi (Churches’ Commission for Migrants in Europe), deluje pa kot odprt, neformalen in politično nevtralen prostor za izmenjavo informacij z najrazličnejših
The Diaspora Forum for Development (DFD) in the Netherlands brings together 21 national Diaspora organisations representing migrants and refugees from sixteen countries of origin.
„Forum diaspore za razvoj“ (Diaspora Forum for Development – DFD) na Nizozemskem združuje 21 nacionalnih organizacij diaspore, ki zastopajo migrante in begunce iz šestnajstih držav izvora.
It serves as a coordinating body by broadening these organisations’ constituencies, building their strategic horizontal alliances, and increasing their voice in policy-making on migration and development.
Deluje kot usklajevalni organ, ki širi volilna okrožja teh organizacij, krepi njihove strateške horizontalne povezave in povečuje njihovo vlogo pri oblikovanju priseljenskih in razvojnih politik.
Migrant leaders were judged relevant to participate based on their ability to translate practical experiences into models for policy instruments.
Ocena pomembnosti sodelovanja priseljenskih voditeljev je temeljila na njihovi sposobnosti prenosa praktičnih izkušenj v modele političnih instrumentov.
The format of meetings were organised with the aim of promoting uninhibited discussions among people of diverse backgrounds.
Oblika sestankov je bila uvedena zato, da se spodbudijo nemotene razprave med osebami z različnimi ozadji.
A number of platforms adopt eligibility criteria related to composition.
Mnoge platforme določijo merila upravičenosti v povezavi s svojo sestavo.
Most want to attain a balance between immigrant and host society groups.
Večina jih želi ohraniti ravnotežje med skupinami priseljencev in skupinami iz gostiteljske družbe.
Others go further to include a diversity of perspectives from within immigrant as well as host society groups.
Druge naredijo korak naprej in vključijo še raznolike vidike iz skupin priseljencev in gostiteljske družbe.