natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In 2006 the Transparency Department examined a total of 949 classified documents (against 593 classified documents in 2005) including 45 classified as "CONFIDENTIEL UE" and 904 classified as "RESTREINT UE"8
Leta 2006 je Urad za preglednost preu_13il skupno 949 tajnih dokumentov (za razliko od 593 tajnih dokumentov leta 2005), od katerih je bilo 45 dokumentov opredeljenih kot "CONFIDENTIEL UE", 904 dokumenti pa kot "RESTREINT UE"8
In order to conduct their examination, Transparency Department officials systematically consult the authors/departments concerned.
Kljub pogosto zelo zapleteni naravi dokumentacije, ki jo je treba preu_13iti, generalni sekretariat Sveta uspeva obvladovati s tem povezano nara_9_13ajo_13e upravno breme ter izpolnjevati pogoje in roke iz Uredbe _9t. 1049/2001.
It should be noted in this connection that the time-limit for replying is 15 working days, with a possible extension of a further 15 working days in duly justified cases, e.g. where the application concerns a very large number of documents.
V zvezi s tem je treba omeniti, da je _13asovni rok za odgovor 15 delovnih dni, z mo_11nostjo podalj_9anja za nadaljnjih 15 delovnih dni v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih, na primer kadar se pro_9nja nana_9a na veliko _9tevilo dokumentov.
In 2006 the average time for processing initial applications was 14 working days.
Leta 2006 je obravnava za_13etnih pro_9enj v povpre_13ju trajala 14 delovnih dni.
The Council Secretariat extended the time-limit in 18,6% of initial applications but it is forced to use this option more frequently for confirmatory applications, which have to be examined by the Working Party on Information before being submitted to Coreper and the Council for adoption, each of these steps requiring some time.
Sekretariat Sveta je _13asovni rok podalj_9al pri 18,6% za_13etnih pro_9enj, to mo_11nost pa je prisiljen pogosteje izrabiti za potrdilne pro_9nje, ki jih mora pregledati Delovna skupina za informiranje, preden se te predlo_11ijo Coreperju in Svetu v sprejetje, saj vsak izmed teh korakov vzame nekaj _13asa.
Where a document is still subject to discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies, and this document reflects the positions of delegations, the situation may arise that full release of the document can interfere with the proper conduct of the negotiations.
V primerih, ko se o dokumentu v okviru Sveta ali njegovih pripravljalnih teles _9e razpravlja in ta dokument odra_11a stali_9_13a delegacij, bi lahko popolno razkritje tega dokumenta oviralo pravilno izvedbo pogajanj.
The documents in question concerned notably the areas of Justice and Home Affairs (40,6%), CFSP (21,2%) and enlargement (34,9%).
Zadevni dokumenti so se nana_9ali predvsem na podro_13je pravosodja in notranjih zadev (40,6 %), SZVP (21,2 %) ter na _9iritev (34,9 %).
As in previous years, in 2006 the Council Secretariat ran a series of training sessions 9for Council staff responsible for document production in order to familiarise them with the procedures and practice to be followed as regards public access to documents.
Sekretariat Sveta je tako kot v preteklih letih tudi v letu 2006 izvedel vrsto usposabljanj9za osebje Sveta, odgovorno za pripravo dokumentov, da bi se seznanilo s postopki in prakso, ki naj se uporabljajo v zvezi z dostopom javnosti do dokumentov.
In 2006, the "Transparency, access to documents and information to the public" Unit of the General Secretariat of the Council (DG F) had a staff of 16, allocated as follows:
Leta 2006 je bilo v enoti generalnega sekretariata Sveta "Preglednost, dostop javnosti do dokumentov in informacij" (DG F) 16 zaposlenih, ki so bili razporejeni na slede_13i na_13in:
The staff of the "Information to the public" section handles the requests for information from members of the public under the Code of good administrative behaviour for the General Secretariat of the Council 10. In
Osebje slu_11be "Informacije za javnost" pro_9nje za informacije, ki jih dobi od posameznikov, obravnava v skladu s kodeksom dobrega upravnega obna_9anja generalnega sekretariata Sveta10.
2006, the service received a total of 17 712 communications from the public (including 11 070 petitions) and dealt with 4 811 requests for information, of which 3913 were forwarded by e-mail and 898 were sent
Leta 2006 je slu_11ba od javnosti prejela skupno 17.712 sporo_13il (vklju_13no z 11.070 peticijami) in obravnavala 4.811 pro_9enj za informacije, od katerih jih je bilo 3.913 poslanih po elektronski po_9ti, 898 pa v pismu11.
In all, four training sessions (one per quarter) were organised during the reference period; in addition specific briefing meetings were held between Transparency Department staff, members of the GSC's various departments concerned and members of the Council's preparatory bodies.
V referen_13nem obdobju so bila organizirana skupno _9tiri usposabljanja (eno usposabljanje na _13etrtletje); poleg tega so med osebjem Urada za preglednost, _13lani razli_13nih zadevnih slu_11b generalnega sekretariata Sveta in _13lani pripravljalnih teles Sveta potekali posebni informativni sestanki.
In 2005, the figure was 13 147 communications (11 785 sent by e-mail and 1 362 by letter).
Leta 2005 je bilo poslanih 13.147 sporo_13il (11.785 po elektronski po_9ti in 1.362 v pismu).
In the initial stage, applications from members of the public for access to Council documents are handled by the General Secretariat of the Council.
V za_13etni fazi pro_9nje posameznikov za dostop do dokumentov Sveta obravnava generalni sekretariat Sveta.
If the confirmatory application is totally or partially refused, the applicant may lodge a complaint with the European Ombudsman or institute proceedings before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities.
Priloga k temu poro_13ilu navaja statisti_13ne podatke glede dostopa javnosti do dokumentov Sveta za prvih pet let po za_13etku veljavnosti Uredbe _9t. 1049/2001.
During the reference period the Council received 2 224 requests from the public for access to a total of 11 353 documents.
V referen_13nem obdobju je Svet s strani javnosti prejel 2.224 pro_9enj za dostop do skupno 11.353 dokumentov.
The number of documents disclosed in full or in part (following initial or confirmatory applications) totalled 9 606 in 2006.
Skupno _9tevilo dokumentov, v celoti ali delno razkritih (po vlo_11itvi za_13etnih ali potrdilnih pro_9enj), je leta 2006 zna_9alo 9.606.
As the statistics for Internet consultation of the public register of Council documents demonstrate, the Internet register continues to be an important research tool for citizens wishing to keep close track of the activities of the European Union.
Kot ka_11e statistika internetnih poizvedb po dokumentih Sveta v javnem registru, internetni register _9e naprej ostaja pomembno raziskovalno orodje za dr_11avljane, ki _11elijo podrobno spremljati dejavnosti Evropske unije.
This is borne out by the almost 61,8% increase in the number of visits (a number which has risen for four years in succession).
To dejstvo podpira skoraj 61,8 % pove_13anje _9tevila obiskov (_9tevilo se je pove_13alo _11e _13etrto zaporedno leto).
Initial applications came mainly from students and researchers (34,5 %).
Za_13etne pro_9nje so po_9iljali predvsem _9tudenti in raziskovalci (34,5 %).
Lawyers (9,1 %), industry and commerce and pressure groups (17,6 %) were also high on the list of social and professional categories represented.
Visoko na seznamu zastopanih dru_11benih in poklicnih kategorij so bili tudi pravniki (9,1 %), predstavniki industrije in trgovine ter interesne skupine (17,6 %).
Since applicants are not required to give their identity or provide reasons for their applications, which are usually sent by e-mail, the occupations of a significant proportion (13,6 %) of them is unknown.
Glede na to, da prosilcem ni treba razkriti svoje identitete niti navesti vzrokov, zakaj po_9iljajo pro_9nje – te navadno prispejo prek elektronske po_9te – poklic znatnega dele_11a (13,6 %) prosilcev ni znan.
Most confirmatory applications also originated from students and researchers (54,3 %).
Tudi ve_13ino potrdilnih pro_9enj so poslali _9tudenti in raziskovalci (54,3 %).
Journalists accounted for only 5,7 % of applicants at the confirmatory stage, mainly because for journalists the institutions' public document registers represent only one of several possible sources of information.
Novinarji so predstavljali zgolj 5,7 % prosilcev v potrdilni fazi, predvsem zaradi tega, ker so za novinarje javni registri institucij le eden izmed ve_13 mo_11nih virov informacij.
It is therefore not surprising that the few applications for access from journalists came in the main from the field of investigative journalism and were hence similar to applications from academics.
Zato ne presene_13a dejstvo, da je tistih nekaj pro_9enj za dostop, ki so jih poslali novinarji, prispelo predvsem s podro_13ja raziskovalnega novinarstva, torej so bile podobne pro_9njam iz akademskih krogov.
As regards the geographical distribution of applicants, the majority of initial applications came from Belgium (26,1 %), Germany (15,4 %), France (8,1%) and the United Kingdom (7,8 %).
Kar zadeva geografsko zastopanost prosilcev, je ve_13ina za_13etnih pro_9enj prispela iz Belgije (26,1 %), Nem_13ije (15,4 %), Francija (8,1 %) in Zdru_11enega kraljestva (7,8 %).
Applications originating from non-EU countries represented 8,5 % of the total.
Pro_9nje iz dr_11av, ki niso _13lanice EU, so predstavljale 8,5 % vseh pro_9enj.
Confirmatory applications came mainly from the following five countries: the United Kingdom (22,9 %), Germany (22,8 %), Belgium (17,1 %), Italy (8,6 %) and the Netherlands (8,6 %) 12.
Potrdilne pro_9nje so prispele predvsem iz naslednjih petih dr_11av: Zdru_11enega kraljestva (22,9 %), Nem_13ije (22,8 %), Belgije (17,1 %), Italije (8,6 %) in Nizozemske (8,6 %)12.
The relatively high number of initial and confirmatory applications originating from Belgium is explained by the fact that several multinational companies and international law firms, as well as numerous associations representing various economic and industrial sectors at European level have their headquarters in Brussels.
Sorazmerno visoko _9tevilo za_13etnih in potrdilnih pro_9enj iz Belgije pojasnjuje dejstvo, da ima veliko multinacionalnih dru_11b in mednarodnih odvetni_9kih dru_11b kot tudi veliko zdru_11enj, ki zastopajo razne gospodarske in industrijske sektorje na evropski ravni, svoj sede_11 v Bruslju.
As regards the fields covered by the applications, the interest in Justice and Home Affairs remained high (24,5 %) 13.
Kar zadeva podro_13ja, na katera se nana_9ajo pro_9nje, je bilo _9e vedno veliko zanimanja na podro_13ju pravosodja in notranjih zadev (24,5 %)13.
This was followed, in descending order, by applications for documents on external relations and
Temu so v padajo_13em vrstnem redu sledile pro_9nje za dokumente s podro_13ij zunanjih odnosov in SZVP (14,3 %), okolja (6,6 %), kmetijstva in ribi_9tva (5,9 %) ter konkuren_13nosti (5,8 %).
Applicants' interest in Justice and Home Affairs (24,5% of applications in 2006 as against 22,5% in 2005) the CFSP (14,3% in 2006, 12,8% in 2005) and competitiveness (5,8% in 2006, 5,3% in 2005) remained fairly steady, whereas internal-market-related applications went further down to 4,6% (as against 6,2 % in
Zanimanje prosilcev za podro_13ja pravosodja in notranjih zadev (24,5 % pro_9enj v letu 2006 za razliko od 22,5 % v letu 2005), SZVP (14,3 % v letu 2006, 12,8 % v letu 2005) in konkuren_13nosti (5,8 % v letu 2006, 5,3 % v letu 2005) je ostalo precej stabilno, medtem ko se je na podro_13ju notranjega trga _9tevilo
During the reference period, the General Secretariat examined 11 353 documents, 9 606 of which were made available in the initial stage (reply supplied by the General Secretariat on behalf of the Council).
V referen_13nem obdobju je generalni sekretariat preu_13il 11.353 dokumentov, od katerih je bilo 9.606 dostopnih v za_13etni fazi (odgovor je v imenu Sveta poslal generalni sekretariat).
40 confirmatory applications were made in respect of 142 documents, as a result of which the Council decided to disclose an additional 99 documents (46 in full and 53 in part).
Za 142 dokumentov je bilo vlo_11enih 40 potrdilnih pro_9enj, zaradi _13esar se je Svet odlo_13il razkriti dodatnih 99 dokumentov (46 v celoti in 53 delno).
In 2005, most confirmatory applications came from Belgium (28,1 %), the United Kingdom (18,8 %) and Germany (12,5 %).
Leta 2005 je ve_13ina potrdilnih pro_9enj prispela iz Belgije (28,1 %), Zdru_11enega kraljestva (18,8 %) in Nem_13ije (12,5 %).
This figure is slightly up on the previous year (22,5%) In 1999 justice and home affairs accounted for 37 % of applications for access, a percentage which fell to 29 % in 2000, 29,5 % in 2001, 24,4 % in 2002, 22 % in 2003, and 20,4% in 2004.
Glede na preteklo leto se je _9tevilo nekoliko pove_13alo (22,5 %). Leta 1999 so pro_9nje za dostop na podro_13ju pravosodja in notranjih zadev predstavljale 37 % vseh pro_9enj, ta odstotek pa je nato padel na 29 % leta 2000, 29,5 % leta 2001, 24,4 % leta 2002, 22 % leta 2003 in 20,4 % leta 2004.
Of the documents disclosed in full following application for access, 24,3 % related to justice and home affairs, 11,5 % to the CFSP, 7,4 % to the internal market and 6,8 % to social policy.
Od dokumentov, razkritih v celoti po prejemu pro_9nje za dostop, se jih je 24,3 % nana_9alo na pravosodje in notranje zadeve, 11,5 % na SZVP, 7,4 % na notranji trg ter 6,8 % na socialno politiko.
Of the total number of documents disclosed (in full or in part), 28,2 % concerned justice and home affairs 12,7 % CFSP, 6,9 % the internal market and 6,4 % social policy.
Od skupnega _9tevila dokumentov (razkritih v celoti ali deloma) je 28,2 % dokumentov zadevalo pravosodje in notranje zadeve, 12,7 % SZVP, 6,9 % notranji trg ter 6,4 % socialno politiko.
Thus, of the 11 353 documents requested during the reference period, access to 1 648 was refused (initial and confirmatory phases taken together), giving an access percentage of 76,8 % (documents requested and disclosed in full) or 87,7 % if documents approved for partial access are taken into account.
Tako je bil izmed 11.353 zahtevanih dokumentov v referen_13nem obdobju za 1.648 dokumentov dostop zavrnjen (v za_13etni in potrdilni fazi skupaj), kar pomeni odstotek odobrenih dostopov v vi_9ini 76,8 % (zahtevanih dokumentov, razkritih v celoti) oziroma 87,7 %, _13e se upo_9tevajo dokumenti, za katere se je odobril delni dostop.
While the rate of access to Council documents thus increased from 81,2% in 2005 to 87,7% in 2006, these figures must not only be viewed in conjunction with the rise in the number of documents requested (up 20% on the previous year), but also in the light of the significant numbers of documents (102 087 in 2006 compared with 77 832 in 2005) which were made directly available via the register as soon as they had been circulated.
Medtem ko se je stopnja dostopa do dokumentov Sveta tako pove_13ala z 81,2 % leta 2005 na 87,7 % leta 2006, je treba to dejstvo razumeti v povezavi s pove_13anjem _9tevila zahtevanih dokumentov (20 % ve_13 kot leto poprej) ter tudi v lu_13i znatnega _9tevila dokumentov, ki prek registra postanejo neposredno dostopni takoj po objavi (102.087 v letu 2006 v primerjavi s 77.832 v letu 2005).
With initial applications, the grounds for refusal most frequently invoked were the protection of the decisionmaking process, which accounted for nearly half of all refusals (43,2 %), followed by the protection of the public interest as regards public security (17,1 %), international relations (12,3 %) and defence and military matters (4,5 %).
Pri za_13etnih pro_9njah je bil najpogosteje navedeni razlog za zavrnitev varstvo postopka odlo_13anja, in sicer pri skoraj polovici vseh zavrnitev (43,2 %), sledijo mu varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva javno varnost (17,1 %), mednarodne odnose (12,3 %), ter obrambne in voja_9ke zadeve (4,5 %).
In 20,2 % of cases several grounds for refusal were invoked: thus protection of the decisionmaking process was often given in conjunction with protection of the public interest as regards international relations (8,7%) or public security (2,8 %).
Pri 20,2 % primerov je bilo navedenih ve_13 razlogov za zavrnitev: tako je bilo varstvo postopka odlo_13anja pogosto navedeno v povezavi z varstvom javnega interesa, kar zadeva mednarodne odnose (8,7 %) ali javno varnost (2,8 %).
Similarly, in a number of cases, the protection of the public interest as regards public security was associated with the protection of the public interest as regards international relations (3,6 %)
Podobno je bilo v vrsti primerov varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva javno varnost, navedeno v povezavi z varstvom javnega interesa, kar zadeva mednarodne odnose (3,6 %).
With regard to confirmatory applications, protection of the public interest as regards public security was invoked as grounds for 37,2% of refusals in 2006 (49,6 % in 2005).
V zvezi s potrdilnimi pro_9njami je bilo varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva javno varnost, navedeno kot razlog za 37,2 % zavrnitev leta 2006 (49,6 % leta 2005).
In 2006 protection of the public interest as regards international relations was invoked in 14 % of cases (20,3 % in 2005), and protection of the public interest as regards defence and military matters in 16,3 % of cases (5,7 % in 2005).
V letu 2006 je bilo varstvo javnega interesa v zvezi z mednarodnimi odnosi navedeno kot razlog pri 14 % primerov (20,3 % v letu 2005) ter v zvezi z obrambnimi in voja_9kimi zadevami pri 16,3 % primerov (5,7 % v letu 2005).
As regards the protection of the decisionmaking process, this reason for refusal was used in 7% of cases (11,4% in 2005).
Varstvo postopka odlo_13anja je bilo navedeno kot razlog za zavrnitev pri 7 % primerov (11,4 % v letu 2005).
Finally, in 20,9 % of cases, several different reasons for refusals were given: in a number of cases, the protection of the public interest as regards international relations was associated with other grounds for refusal, such as protection of public security (7,5 %) or protection of the decisionmaking process (5%).
V 20,9 % primerov pa je bilo navedenih ve_13 razli_13nih razlogov za zavrnitev: v ve_13 primerih je bilo varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva mednarodne odnose, povezano z drugimi razlogi za zavrnitev, kot je varstvo javne varnosti (7,5 % primerov) ali varstvo postopka odlo_13anja (5 % primerov).
The protection of court proceedings and legal advice (exception provided for in the second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001) was invoked as grounds in the initial phase in a mere 2 % of refusals in 2006 (1,8 % in 2005) and in 4,6% of refusals at the confirmatory stage.
Varstvo sodnih postopkov in pravnih nasvetov (izjema, predvidena v drugi alinei _13lena 4(2) Uredbe _9t. 1049/2001) je bilo v letu 2006 navedeno kot razlog pri zgolj 2 % zavrnitev v za_13etni fazi (1,8 % v 2005) in pri 4,6 % zavrnitev v potrdilni fazi.
While this exception is not the Council's most frequently invoked grounds for refusal, its importance for the proper functioning and effectiveness of the institution's work should nevertheless be stressed15.
_12eprav ta izjema ni najpogosteje navedeni razlog Sveta za zavrnitev, je vendarle treba poudariti njen pomen za pravilno in u_13inkovito delovanje institucije15.
The practice is as far as possible to grant partial access, in accordance with Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, to documents containing Council Legal Service opinions and contributions by the Legal Service to the proceedings of the Council and its preparatory bodies.
V praksi se, kolikor je mogo_13e pogosto, v skladu s _13lenom 4(6) Uredbe (ES) _9t. 1049/2001 odobri delni dostop do dokumentov, ki vsebujejo mnenja pravne slu_11be Sveta in prispevke pravne slu_11be k postopkom Sveta in njegovih pripravljalnih teles.
On the basis of case-law established over several years 16, and confirmed in 2004 by the Court of First Instance in its judgment in the Turco case 17, the Council considers that the independent advice provided for the Council by the Legal Service allows the Council to ensure that its acts comply with Community law and to pursue the discussion on the legal aspects of a dossier.
Na podlagi ve_13letne sodne prakse16, in kakor jo je leta 2004 potrdilo Sodi_9_13e prve stopnje v svoji sodbi v zadevi Turco17, Svet meni, da lahko zaradi neodvisnega svetovanja, ki mu ga nudi pravna slu_11ba, zagotavlja, da so njegova dejanja v skladu s pravom Skupnosti, in pospe_9uje razprave o pravnih vidikih posameznih primerov. _12e bi Svet izgubil ta instrument, bi bila uspe_9nost njegovega delovanja ogro_11ena.
In this connection, see the order of the Court of First Instance of 3 March 1998 in Case T-610/97 R, Carlsen and others v. Council, ECR 1998, p.
V zvezi s tem glej odredbo Sodi_9_13a prve stopnje z dne 3. marca 1998 v zadevi T-610/97 R, Carlsen in drugi proti Svetu, PSES 1998, str.
II-485, paragraphs 45 to 47, and its ruling of 8 November 2000 in case T-44/97, Ghignone and others v. Council, ECR 2000, p.
II-485, odstavki 45 do 47, in njegovo odlo_13itev z dne 8. novembra 2000 v zadevi T-44/97, Ghignone in drugi proti Svetu, PSES 2000, str.
This case-law was cited by the Court in its order of 23 October 2002 in case C-445/00, Austria v. Council, paragraph 12.
To sodno prakso je Sodi_9_13e navedlo v svoji odredbi z dne 23. oktobra 2002 v primeru C-445/00, Avstrija proti Svetu, odstavek 12.
See judgment by the Court of First Instance of 23 November 2004 in Case T-84/03 Maurizio Turco v. Council (not yet published in the ECR), paragraphs 62 et seq.
Glej sodbo Sodi_9_13a prve stopnje z dne 23. novembra 2004 v zadevi T-84/03 Maurizio Turco proti Svetu (_9e ni objavljena v PSES), odstavek 62 in nadaljnji odstavki.
This judgement is currently under appeal (Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P).
Na to sodbo je trenutno vlo_11ena prito_11ba (zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P).
Following the adoption of an overall policy on transparency by the European Council in June 2006, a number of measures have been taken with a view to further improve public access to the decisionmaking process of the Council18.
Potem ko je Evropski svet junija 2006 sprejel splo_9no politiko preglednosti, je bilo sprejetih ve_13 ukrepov z namenom dodatnega izbolj_9anja dostopa javnosti do postopka odlo_13anja Sveta18.
Thus, the relevant provisions of the Council's Rules of Procedure have been modified with a view to further open up the work of the institution, by making public:
Ustrezne dolo_13be poslovnika Sveta so bile spremenjene, da bi se tako _9e pove_13ala odprtost delovanja te institucije, in v skladu s tem se sedaj objavijo:
• all Council deliberations on legislative acts to be adopted by co-decision;
• vse razprave Sveta o zakonodajnih aktih, ki jih je treba sprejeti v postopku soodlo_13anja;
• the Council's first deliberations on legislative acts other than those adopted by co-decision and the subsequent deliberations on a particular act, unless the Council or the Permanent Representatives Committee decide otherwise;
• prve razprave Sveta o zakonodajnih aktih, razen tistih, ki jih je treba sprejeti v postopku soodlo_13anja, in naslednje razprave o posameznem aktu, razen _13e Svet ali Odbor stalnih predstavnikov ne odlo_13i druga_13e;
• the General Affairs and External Relations Council's deliberations on the 18 month programme, as well as other Council configurations' deliberations on their priorities;
• razprave Sveta za splo_9ne zadeve in zunanje odnose o 18-mese_13nem programu, kakor tudi razprave, ki jih v zvezi s svojimi prednostnimi nalogami pripravijo druge sestave Sveta;
• the Commission's presentation of its five year programme, of its annual work programme and of its annual policy strategy, as well as the ensuing debate;
• predstavitev petletnega programa Komisije, njenega letnega delovnega programa in letne strategije politike ter razprave, ki sledijo;
• other debates on important issues affecting the interests of the Union and its citizens
• druge razprave o pomembnih vpra_9anjih, ki zadevajo interese Unije in njenih dr_11avljanov