natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‡ better knowledge: they understand their situation and know other people who are in the same situation;
‡ boljþega znanja: razumejo svoj polo™aj in poznajo druge ljudi, ki so v podobnem polo™a-ju;
‡ increased con«dence:theyhavethecon«dencetoaddresstheirproblem.
‡ veｲje samozavesti: reþevanja problemov se lotevajo z zaupanjem.
Some illustrative cases are given below.
Spodaj je nekaj zgledov:
We put a special search tool on the website to encourage people to get information on a low-key basis, without having to talk to anyone.
Na spletno mesto smo dali posebno iskalno orodje, ki je ljudi spodbudilo k neopa™enemu, zasebnejþemu pridobivanju informacij, tako da jim o tem ni bilo treba govoriti z drugimi.
A s i g n i « c a n t r e po r t e d i m p a c t b y n e t w o r k e d N G O s i s t h a t b e n e « c i a r i e s k nffo w m o r e o f t e n t h a nbef o r e this project who to call for help, the directory providing useful contact points across Europe.
Pomemben vpliv, o katerem so poroｲale nevladne organizacije v mre™ah, je, da prejemniki zdaj pogosteje kot pred projektom vedo, koga poklicati na pomoｲ, saj vsebuje imenik koristne kon-taktne toｲke v vsej Evropi.
There's a joined-up approach to people who have su.eredfromabuse.Theynowgetthesameservice from the national health service and police and each understands what the other is doing.
Zdaj imamo skupen pristop do ljudi, ki so utrpeli zlorabe. Enako storitev dobijo od nacional-nega zdravstvenega varstva in policije in vsaka stran razume, kaj poｲne druga.
There is an increase of services in the region and these are integrated services to families.
Þtevilo storitev v regiji se je poveｲalo; gre za integrirane storitve za pomoｲ dru™inam.
This began in 2000 with one headquarters and now there are several.
Zaｲelo se je leta 2000 z enim uradom, zdaj pa jih je ™e veｲ.
A national organisation has been founded: the Broken Rainbow, where counselling services are available for lesbians.
Ustanovljena je bila nacionalna organizacija Broken Rainbow (razbita mavrica), kjer je na voljo tudi svetovanje lezbijkam.
The impact on end-bene«ciariesismoreindirectthantheimpactontargetgroups,becausethey are less involved in the process.
Vpliv na konｲne prejemnike je bolj neposreden kot vpliv na ciljne skupine, ker so manj vklju-ｲene v ta proces.
End-bene«ciariesarerecipientsofthecareandservicesof the partners and target groups.
Konｲni prejemniki so prejemniki nege in storitev partnerjev in ciljnih skupin.
They bene«tthroughtheirenhancedunderstanding,ca-pacity, performance and cooperation.
Pomagajo jim v programu pridobljeni boljþe razumevanje, zmo™nost, storilnost in sodelovanje.
The more the representatives of target groups are lead-ers, the larger the expected impact.
Bolj ko so predstavniki ciljnih skupin vodje, veｲji je priｲakovani vpliv.
In fact, some projects were successful in reaching com-munity leaders (e.g. FGM stakeholders) or decision-makers (e.g. trade unions) and registered substantial impact on end-bene«ciariesasillustratedbelow.
Nekateri projekti so bili dejansko uspeþni v doseganju vodilnih oseb v skupnosti (npr. soudele™enci skupine za boj proti spolnim zlorabam ™ensk) ali nosilcev odloｲanja (npr. sindikatov) in so zabele™ili znaten vpliv na konｲne prejemnike, kot je prikazano spodaj:
Workers now get a good service and union representatives now have negotiated clauses to support prevention from sexual harassment.
Delavci zdaj dobijo dobre storitve in predstavniki sindikata so izpogajali klavzule o podpori prepreｲevanju spolnega nadlego-vanja na delovnem mestu.
During the project, partners discussed four times with the head of the police of the city of Frank-furt.
Med projektom so partnerji þtirikrat imeli razpravo s þefom policije mesta Frankfurt.
The aim was to change the attitude of police and see hate crimes against lesbian women as a phenomenon they have to deal with.
Namen je bil spremeniti odnos policije, da bi videla prestopke, storjene iz sovra™nosti do lezbijk, kot pojav, proti kateremu je treba ukrepati. Akcija je pripomogla k usposabljanju frankfurtske policije.
Factors of impact on end-bene«ciaries(N = 113 projects having mentioned up to three contributing or limiting factors of impact)
(N = 113 projektov, ki so navedli do 3 pozitivne ali omejevalne dejavnike)
Quality of the outputs: 54 %
Kakovost rezultatov: 54 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 10 %
Pasovna ustreznost razþirjanja: 5 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 44 %
Raven strokovnega znanja partnerjev v projektu in njihovo dopolnjevanje: 44 %
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 5 %
Stopnja sodelovanja uporabnikov/prejemnikov: 4 %
Degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries:39%
Stopnja sodelovanja uporabnikov/prejemnikov: 39 %
Adequacy of the project objectives to the context: 35 %
Ustreznost ciljev glede na okvir projekta: 35 %
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 3 %
Stopnja sodelovanja predstavnikov ciljnih skupin: 3 %
Degree of involvement of representatives of target groups: 33 %
Stopnja sodelovanja predstavnikov ciljnih skupin: 33 %
Synergies with other projects and/or other initiatives: 2 %
Sinergije z drugimi projekti in/ali pobudami: 2 %
Degree of transnationality of the partnership: 19 %
Stopnja nadnacionalnosti partnerstva: 19 %
Other (limited access to schools): 1 %
Drugo (omejen dostop za þole): 1 %
Political interest/visibility: 14 %
Sredstva/viri za projekt: 17 %Politiｲni interes/opaznost: 14 %
Synergies with other projects and/or other initiatives (EU, national, regional, local): 6 %
Sinergije z drugimi projekti in/ali pobudami (EU, nacionalne, regionalne, lokalne): 6 %
Less mentioned
Pasovna ustreznost razþirjanja: 3 %
The main factors contributing to these impacts are the quality of the outputs (54 % of the projects with impact), the level of expertise and complementarities of the project partners (44 %), the degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries(39%),theadequacyoftheprojectobjectives to the context (35 %) and the degree of involvement of representatives of target groups (33 %).
Glavni dejavniki, ki prispevajo k tem vplivom, so kakovost rezultatov (54 % projektov z vplivi), raven strokovnega znanja in dopolnjevanje partnerjev v projektih (44 %), stopnja sodelovanja uporabnikov/prejemnikov (39 %), ustreznost ciljev glede na okvir projekta (35 %) in stopnja sodelovanja predstavnikov ciljnih skupin (33 %).
The importance of the factors `involvement of end-bene«ciaries'and`involvementoftargetgroups' shows again the need to involve them in the project from the start.
Pomembnost dejavnikov, ki spadajo v ¶sodelovanje konｲnih prejemnikovƒ in ¶sodelovanje ciljnih skupinƒ, znova poka™e potrebo po njihovem razvijanju v projektih ™e od samega za-ｲetka.
In fact, the close involvement of target groups and end-bene«ciariesthroughouttheprojectcontributestothe production of credible and valid outputs tailored to their needs and it favours the wide reception/acceptability of these outputs.
Tesno sodelovanje ciljnih skupin in konｲnih prejemnikov v teku celotnega projekta dejansko prispeva k verodostojnim in veljavnim rezultatom, ki se skladajo z njihovimi potre-bami, in daje prednost þiroki sprejemljivosti teh rezultatov.
Such participation is also valuable in raising their awareness and in turn encouraging them to reach broader audiences.
Tako sodelovanje je dragoceno tudi pri dviganju stopnje njihove ozaveþｲenosti in jih spodbuja, da pridobivajo þirþo javnost.
The joint participation of target groups and end-bene«ciariesisalsoimportantinordertofavour exchanges and understanding between them.
Skupno sodelovanje ciljnih skupin in konｲnih prejemnikov je pomembno tudi zato, ker spod-buja medsebojne izmenjave in razumevanje.
Impacts on legislation, policy and institutional behaviours
Vplivi na zakonodajo, politiko in obnaþanje ustanov
It should be « r s t nffo t e d t h a t t h e p r i m a r y a i m o f D a p h n e i s nffo t t op r o po s e l e g i s l a t i v e mffe a s u r e s o r to change policies.
Najprej moramo ugotoviti, da osnovni cilj programa Daphne ni predlaganje zakonodajnih ukrepov ali spreminjanje politik.
However, as a side-e.ectduetothestrongcommitmentanddedicationof some organisations, some legislative or policy changes occurred.
Ne glede na to je bil zaradi neomajne predanosti in zaveza-nosti nekaterih organizacij njegov stranski uｲinek tudi tak, da je priþlo do nekaterih sprememb v zakonodaji in politiki.
This can be seen as a plus.
To lahko vidimo kot prednost.
Emergence of local, regional, national publicly funded initiatives
Pojavljanje lokalno/regionalno/ nacionalno «nanciranihpobud
Legislative/regulatory changes
Vidnost/razprava o nasilju v javnosti
Visibility/debate of violence in the public arena
Veｲja odprtost za prakse iz drugih dr™av/organizacij
The most frequent impacts concern di.erentcategoriesofinstitutionsandconsistof`in-creased awareness of issues of violence', `visibility/debate of violence in the public arena' as well as `more openness to experiences from other countries/settings'.
Najpogostejþi vplivi zadevajo razliｲne kategorije ustanov in so sestavljeni iz ¶veｲje ozaveþｲe-nosti o nasiljuƒ, ¶opaznosti/razprav o nasilju v javnostiƒ in ¶veｲje odprtosti za prakse iz drugih dr™av/organizacijƒ.
Those impacts are main-ly attributable to the distribution of materials to local/regional/national authorities, ministries and/or Members of Parliament as well as to the participation of such organisations in confer-ences, workshops and/or seminars.
Te vplive gre v glavnem pripisati razdeljevanju gradiv lokalnim/regional-nim/nacionalnim oblastem, ministrstvom in/ali ｲlanom parlamenta, kakor tudi sodelovanju teh organizacij na konferencah, delavnicah in/ali seminarjih.
They can be summarised by saying that Daphne contrib-uted to the recognition of some issues of violence and to feeding discussions on how to «ghtagainst violence.
Povzeti jih je mogoｲe z beseda-mi, da je program Daphne prispeval k prepoznavanju nekaterih vpraþanj v zvezi z nasiljem in k vsebinskemu bogatenju razprav o tem, kako se boriti zoper nasilje.
Several project coordinators also reported that their Daphne project gave them more visibility and credibility to convince authorities.
Nekaj projektnih koor-dinatorjev je poroｲalo tudi, da jim je njihov projekt v okviru Daphne dal veｲjo opaznost in verodostojnost, s katero so lahko prepriｲali oblasti.
More tangible impacts are `emergence of publicly funded initiatives' and `legislative/regulatory changes'.
Bolj otipljivi vplivi so ¶pojavljanje lokalno, regionalno, nacionalno «nanciranihpobudƒin¶spre-membe zakonodaje/predpisovƒ.
They obviously are less frequent due to their higher degree of di/cultyinbeingachieved.
Ker jih je te™je doseｲi, so oｲitno manj pogosti.
These impacts can be, for example, the creation of a committee to assess the situation and develop strategies, additional funding or a speci«cactionlaunchedbytheauthorities.Theyare more frequently observed in projects coordinated by an NGO (37 % of the projects with this impact) than in projects coordinated by any other organisation (16 %).
Ti vplivi so na primer lahko nastanek odbora za oceno razmer in razvijanje strategij, dodatno «nanciranjeali posebne akcije, ki jih pripravijo oblasti. Pogosteje so prisotni v projektih, ki jih koordinirajo nevladne organizacije (37 % projektov s tem vplivom), kot v projektih, koordiniranih v drugih organizacijah (16 %).
This poses question be-cause one would have expected that projects led by (local) public authorities would have had greater facilities to approach and reach the competent (national) authority.
To poraja vpraþanje, saj bi priｲakovali, da bodo imeli projekti, ki jih vodi-jo (lokalne) javne oblasti na voljo veｲ mo™nosti za pristop in doseganje pristojnih (nacionalnih) oblasti.
The most illustrative cases of `emergence of local, regional, national publicly funded initiatives' are:
Najbolj nazorni zgledi ¶pojavljanja lokalno, regionalno, nacionalno «nanciranihpobudƒso:
‡ development of Caritas a n t i - t r a / c k i n g p r o j e c t i n I t a l y s po n s o r e d b y t h e E C S T OP I I f u n d i n g l i n e and its expansion in Spain and Romania, change of the Lithuanian national strategy on t r a / c k i n g , a n d r e c e p t i o nffo f U N a n d o t h e r E u r op e a n cffo u n t r y f u n d i n g b y a L a t v i a n N G O t offe x p a n d its work on tra/cking;
‡ Razvoj Caritasovega projekta za boj proti nezakonitemu trgovanju z ljudmi v Italiji, ki ga je sponzoriral STOP II Evropske komisije, in njegovo þirjenje v Þpanijo in Romunijo, sprememba litovske nacionalne strategije glede nezakonitega trgovanja in prejetje «nanｲnihsredstevvlatvijski nevladni organizaciji, ki so jih zagotovili OZN in druga evropska dr™ava za þiritev njenega dela na podroｲju boja proti nezakonitemu trgovanju z ljudmi.
‡ launch of national laboratories of violence against women in Belgium and Ireland;
‡ Vzpostavitev nacionalnih laboratorijev za nasilje nad ™enskami v Belgiji in Irski.
‡ creation of a new information/counselling service for victims of family violence at a police setting in Portugal;
‡ Vzpostavitev nove informacijske/svetovalne slu™be za ™rtve dru™inskega nasilja v policijskem okolju na Portugalskem.
‡ expansion of the training sessions addressing black and migrant groups on domestic violence from local level (in the Netherlands) to Birmingham and Ireland;
‡ Þiritev usposabljanj za reþevanje nasilja v domaｲem okolju temnopoltih in migrantskih sku-pin na lokalnih ravneh (Nizozemska) v Birminghamu in na Irskem.
‡ local authority (Equal Opportunity Commission) sponsorship of a campaign against violence on women; it is still collaborating;
‡ Lokalna oblast (Komisija za enake mo™nosti) je sponzorirala kampanjo proti nasilju nad ™enskami in þe vedno sodeluje v njej.
‡ development of a treatment programme for all Internet sex o . e n d e r s i n t h e U K a s a r e s u l t o f a n Irish-led project;
‡ Razvijanje programa zdravljenja za vse internetne spolne prestopnike v Zdru™enem kraljest-vu kot rezultat projekta, ki je potekal na Irskem.
‡ creation of a Forensic Nursing Committee in Ireland for women victims of rape;
‡ Vzpostavitev sodnomedicinskega odbora za bolniþko nego ™ensk, ki so ™rtve posilstva.
‡ creation of a working group on sexual abuse by the Belgian Flemish authorities, which fund-ed a follow-up project;
‡ Delovno skupino za vpraþanja spolne zlorabe so ustanovile belgijske ‹amskeoblasti,kiso«nanciralenadaljevalniprojekt.
‡ provision of further funding to project activities by the Regional Government of Linz (Ûst), previously uninterested in responses to tra/cking;
‡ Zagotovitev nadaljnjega « n a n c i r a nj a p r oj e k t n i h d e j a v n o s t i v r e g i o n a l n i v l a d i L i n z ( Û s t ) , k i d o t l e j ni pokazala zanimanja za odzive na nezakonito trgovanje z ljudmi.
‡ establishment by the Portuguese government, in May 2000, of the national helpline for vic-tims of domestic violence;
‡ Nacionalna telefonska linija za pomoｲ ™rtvam nasilja v domaｲem okolju, ki jo je vzpostavila portugalska vlada maja 2000.
‡ creation within the partner `Regione Marche' (Italy) of a regional coordination table on pros-titution and tra/ckingwiththeparticipationoftheregionalauthoritiesandthefourprov-inces.
‡ V okviru partnerja ¶Regione Marcheƒ (I) nastanek regionalne preglednice za koordinacijo glede prostitucije in nezakonitega trgovanja z ljudmi ob udele™bi regionalnih oblasti in 4 pokrajin.
The impact `legislative/regulatory change' refers more to the promotion of the circumstances favouring legislative/regulatory change than to the change itself.
Vpliv ¶sprememba zakonodaje/predpisovƒ se bolj kot na same spremembe nanaþa na pospeþe-vanje okoliþｲin v prid spremembam zakonodaje.
This promotion notably consists of feeding debates with the expertise, the data and the results obtained through the projects.
To pospeþevanje prispeva predvsem vsebinsko bogatenje razprav s strokovnim znanjem, podatki in rezultati projektov.
Illustrative cases are:
Nazorni zgledi so:
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e c r e a t i o nffo f a n e w S e x O . e n c e B i l l i n t h e U K ;
‡ Vpliv na oblikovanje novega zakona o spolnih prestopkih v Zdru™enem kraljestvu.
‡ the Defensores del Pueblo in Spain have started to take on the idea of special courts for children with rapid judgments.
‡ V Þpaniji se je organizacija varuha ｲlovekovih pravic Defensores del Pueblo zaｲela zavze-mati za posebna sodiþｲa za otroke s pospeþenimi postopki.
The Council of Europe published a book on sexual abuse with one chapter devoted to the project work;
Svet Evrope je izdal knjigo o spol-ni zlorabi, v kateri je eno poglavje posvetil projektnemu delu.
‡ inclusion of `same-sex partnerships' in the German civil law on protecting victims of domes-tic violence;
‡ Vkljuｲitev ¶istospolnih partnerstevƒ v nemþko civilno pravo v zvezi z zaþｲito ™rtev nasilja v domaｲem okolju.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e a d op t i o n i n 2 0 0 2 o f t h e n e w Cffo m mstu n i tffy A c t i o n 9 7 / 15 4 / J A I i nffo r d e r t o i n c l u d e a l l the forms of contemporary slavery;
‡ Vpliv na sprejetje nove ¶Akcije Skupnosti 97/154/JAIƒ v letu 2002, ki vkljuｲuje vse oblike sodob-nega su™enjstva.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e a d op t i o nffo f t h e n e w G e r m a n l a w G e w a l t s c hffu t z Gesetz on domestic violence according to which women can go to courts and apply for the o.enderstoleavetheabode;
‡ Vpliv na sprejetje novega nemþkega zakona ¶Gewaltschutz Gesetzƒ o nasilju v dru™ini, po katerem gredo lahko ™enske na sodiþｲe in vlo™ijo zahtevek, da mora storilec zapustiti skupno stanovanje.
‡ adoption by the Danish government of violence indicators and implementation in national action plans for violence against women;
‡ Sprejetje kazalcev o nasilju v danski vladi in njihova uvedba v nacionalne akcijske naｲrte za boj zoper nasilje nad ™enskami.
‡ elaboration and approval of the Italian Regulation Act for Article 18 of the Immigration Con-solidation Act which promoted a national integrated system of social assistance and integra-tion projects and a national free hotline for the victims of tra/cking;
‡ Izdelava in potrditev italijanskega podzakonskega akta za 18. ｲlen konsolidiranega zakona o priseljevanju, ki je spodbudil integriran nacionalni sistem socialne pomoｲi in projekte inte-gracije ter nacionalne telefonske linije pomoｲi ™rtvam nedovoljene trgovine z ljudmi.
‡ amendment to the UK Mental Health Act based on evidence from the project coordinator concerning the issue of consent for women with learning disabilities, derived from the expe-rience gained in this project;
‡ Dopolnitev britanskega zakona o duþevnem zdravju na podlagi dokazov projektnega koor-dinatorja glede vpraþanja privolitve ™ensk s prizadeto uｲno zmo™nostjo, pridobljenih z izkuþnjami v tem projektu.
‡ new procedures in Belgium to enable Roma children to continue their schooling despite their legal status in the country.
‡ Novi postopki v Belgiji, ki omogoｲajo romskim otrokom nadaljevati þolanje ne glede na njihov pravni status v dr™avi.
The main factors contributing to these impacts on legislation/policy are the `quality of the outputs' (52 % of the projects with impact), the `level of expertise and complementarities of the project partners' (47 %), the `political interest/visibility' (32 %) and the `adequacy of the project objectives to the context' (25 %).
Glavni dejavniki, ki prispevajo k vplivom na zakonodajo/politiko, so ¶kakovost rezultatovƒ (52 % projektov z vplivi), ¶raven strokovnega znanja in dopolnjevanje partnerjev v projektihƒ (47 %), ¶politiｲni interes/opaznostƒ (32 %) in ¶ustreznost ciljev glede na okvir projektaƒ (25 %).
The factor `political interest/visibility' is also a limiting factor for 13 % of the projects.
Dejavnik ¶politiｲni interes/opaznostƒ je obenem tudi omejujoｲ, kar velja za 13 % projektov.
Some project partners might have an in‹uenceonthede«nitionofpoliticalprioritiesandtheirim-plementation.
Nekateri partnerji bi lahko vplivali na de«nicijopolitiｲnoprednostnihnaloginnjihovoizvaja-nje.
In general, the emergence of political interest can be improved as follows:
Na sploþno je mogoｲe spodbujanje politiｲnega interesa izboljþati takole:
‡ by producing valid and credible outputs with the aim of gaining public support that in turn generates political interest;
‡ Z ustvarjanjem veljavnih in verodostojnih rezultatov, katerih cilj je pridobivanje podpore javnosti, ki privede do politiｲnega interesa;
‡ by having close contacts with key decision-makers and policy-makers during the project or at least by disseminating the outputs to them.
‡ Z vzpostavljanjem tesnih stikov z nosilci odloｲanja in oblikovalci politike med projektom ali vsaj z razþirjanjem njegovih rezultatov nanje.
Following this impact assessment, the Daphne programme can be seen as successful in con-tinuing the mobilisation of the NGO sector at all levels, resulting in many new partnerships and alliances that are working together for more comprehensive European policies on vio-lence.
Glede na to oceno vplivov lahko reｲemo, da je program Daphne uspeþen v nadaljnjem vkljuｲevanju sektorja nevladnih organizacij na vseh ravneh, kar vodi do þtevilnih novih part-nerstev in zvez, ki si skupaj prizadevajo za celovitejþe evropske politike proti nasilju.
Good practices
Dobra praksa
In order to improve project selection and to maximise achievement and impact of the objec-tives, it is interesting to understand the factors of success and therefore the good practices developed by the successful projects.
Da bi izboljþali izbor projektov in ｲim bolj podprli doseganje ciljev in vplivov, je zanimivo ve-deti, kateri so dejavniki uspeþnosti, ki pomenijo dobro prakso, razvito v uspeþnih projektih.
In Annex 2, 15 projects that have developed good prac-tices are presented.
V prilogi 2 so predstavljeni projekti, ki so razvili dobro prakso.
The criteria used for the selection of these good practices are as follows:
Merila, uporabljena za izbor teh dobrih praks, so:
‡ compared with other projects in the same «eld,theprojecthassomethingremarkableconcerning one or several of the following aspects: methodology, outputs, impacts, man-agement, dissemination, partnership, participation of end-bene«ciaries,involvementoftarget groups or European-ness.
‡ Projekt v primerjavi z drugimi projekti na istem podroｲju vsebuje izjemno lastnost z enega ali veｲ vidikov: metodologijo, rezultate, vplive, upravljanje, razþirjanje, partnerstvo, sodelo-vanje konｲnih prejemnikov, sodelovanje ciljnih skupin ali evropskost.
This implies that the project is innovative in this regard or at least does much better than others in this respect;
To pomeni, da je v tem pogledu inovativen ali vsaj uspeþnejþi od drugih.
‡ the good practice was a key element that directly contributed to the achievements and impacts of the project.
‡ Dobra praksa je bila kljuｲna prvina, ki je neposredno prispevala k dose™kom in vplivom projekta.
The evaluator has considered the extent and nature of impact from the project that can be attributed to that speci«cgoodpractice;
Ocenjevalec je upoþteval obseg in naravo vpliva projekta, ki jo je mogoｲe pripi-sati prav tej posebni dobri praksi.
‡ the project was a pioneer in «llingagap.Itisworthbeingfurtherdisseminatedorrepli-cated in response to similar needs elsewhere in Europe.
‡ Projekt je pionirski in zapolnjuje vrzel. Vredno ga je razþirjati naprej ali ga replicirati v odziv na podobne potrebe drugod po Evropi.
The 15 good practices mainly refer to the following cases:
15 dobrih praks v glavnem velja za te primere:
‡ end-bene«ciarieswereprotagonistsintheproject:theprojectinvolvedthemfromthebeginning and empowered them;
‡ Projekt je razvil edinstveno metodologijo, vkljuｲeval je vse udele™ence in upoþteval vse reþitve, ki bi osebam v prostituciji lahko prinesle avtonomnost.
‡ the project developed a unique methodology, involving all players and considering all solutions to bring prostitutes to autonomy;
‡ Projekt je razvil nov pristop k skupnemu problemu, saj je naｲel vpraþanje nasilja nad ™en-skami tako, da je poskuþal spreminjati odnos krþilcev moþkega spola do njih.
‡ the project developed a new approach to a common problem, tackling the issue of violence against women by trying to change the male perpetrators' attitudes;
‡ Projekt je razvil visoko kakovosten vpraþalnik, ki je dal prednost visoki odzivnosti pred raz-iskavo.