natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
› They can consult the reports on the operation of the Direc-tive, both as regards the `standards' and the `technical regu-lations' aspect, which are regularly published by the Commission.
› Preverijo lahko poroｲila o delovanju Direktive z vidika ¶standardovƒ in ¶tehniｲnih predpisovƒ, ki jih Komisija redno objavlja.
› In order to facilitate industry's access to national technical regulations, the Commission has developed a comprehen-sive database of all n o t i « e d d r a ft t e x t s c a l l e d T R I S ( T e c h n i c a l R effg u l a t i o n s Information System) which is accessible to the public on the Europa website.
› Da bi Komisija olajþala dostop industrije do nacionalnih teh-niｲnih predpisov, je razvila izｲrpno podatkovno bazo vseh priglaþenih osnutkov besedil, ki se imenuje TRIS (Informacij-ski sistem za tehniｲne predpise) in je dostopna javnosti na spletni strani Europa.
› The Commission issues press releases to inform private indi-viduals and companies of infringement proceedings against texts of technical regulations adopted in breach of the Direc-tive.
› Komisija objavlja poroｲila za javnost zaradi obveþｲanja po-sameznikov in gospodarskih dru™b o postopkih za ugotav-ljanje krþitev, ki so uvedeni za besedila tehniｲnih predpisov, sprejeta v nasprotju z Direktivo.
This information can be used by a private individual or a company before a national authority, in support of the prin-ciple of non-applicability of a technical regulation adopted in breach of Directive 98/34/EC.
Te informacije lahko pred nacionalnim organom uporablja posameznik ali gospodar-ska dru™ba v podporo naｲelu neuporabnosti tehniｲnega predpisa, sprejetega v nasprotju z Direktivo 98/34/ES.
In addition to the search system, the general public can use the automatic Alert System via this Website.
Poleg sistema iskanja lahko þirþa javnost uporablja samodej-ni sistem opozarjanja prek te spletne strani.
The above cited sources of information enable private individ-uals and other interested parties to be informed of the noti«ca-tions and to ensure that technical regulations with which they are obliged to comply have indeed been noti«ed.Ifthisisnotso, they can assert their rights through reference to the case-law of the Court of Justice.
Zgoraj navedeni viri informacij omogoｲajo posameznikom in drugim zainteresiranim strankam, da so obveþｲene o priglasit-vah, in zagotovijo, da so bili tehniｲni predpisi, ki jih morajo iz-polnjevati, zares priglaþeni. Pe ni tako, lahko uresniｲujejo svoje pravice s sklicevanjem na sodno prakso Sodiþｲa.
› Interested parties may also obtain the text of draft technical regulations from the central units of the Member States (list-ed in Annex 1 to this booklet) which are responsible for noti-fying the Commission of national draft technical regula-tions.
› Zainteresirane stranke lahko tudi pridobijo besedilo osnutka tehniｲnih predpisov iz centralnih enot dr™av ｲlanic (navede-nih v Prilogi 1 k tej knji™ici), ki so odgovorne, da Komisiji priglasijo osnutke nacionalnih tehniｲnih predpisov.
› They can ask to consult the monthly register at the Central Secretariat of CEN/CENELEC, which is distributed to all the
› Zahtevajo lahko vpogled v meseｲni register centralnega se-kretariata CEN/CENELEC, ki se razdeli vsem nacionalnim organom za standardizacijo (navedenim v Prilogi 2 k tej knji-
is monitored before its adoption by the Commission and the other Member States (with the exceptions mentioned in the Directive).
Pe ni tako, se lahko gospodarska dru™ba na primer sklicuje na neuporabnost zadevnega predpisa, ｲe bi jo organ obto™il krþitve.
In the event of any national court proceedings resulting from the matter, the court must then set aside the application of the regulation and cannot, as a result, regard it as having been breached.
Pe bi zaradi tega priþlo do postopka pred nacionalnim sodiþｲem, mora sodiþｲe razveljaviti uporabo predpisa in ga ne sme poslediｲno obravnavati, kot da je bil krþen.
These judgments specify the consequences of the adoption of a technical regulation in breach of the obligations laid down by Directive 98/34/EC: private individuals can invoke Articles 8 and 9 of the Directive before the national court, which must refuse to apply a national technical regulation that has not been n o t i « e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e D i r e c t i v e o r w h i c h has been noti«edbuthasbeenadoptedduringandnot after the expiration of the standstill period laid down by the Directive.
Ti sodbi doloｲata posledice sprejetja tehniｲnega predpisa, ｲe se krþijo obveznosti, doloｲene v Direktivi 98/34/ES: posamezni-ki se lahko sklicujejo na ｲlena 8 in 9 Direktive pred nacionalnim sodiþｲem, ki ne sme dovoliti uporabe tehniｲnega predpisa, ki ni bil priglaþen v skladu z Direktivo ali pa je bil priglaþen, vendar sprejet med obdobjem mirovanja, ki ga doloｲa Direktiva, in ne po njegovem poteku.
Private individuals and enterprises have the possibility to en-sure that any technical regulation adopted by a Member State
Posamezniki in podjetja imajo mo™nost zagotoviti, da vsak teh-niｲni predpis, ki ga sprejme dr™ava ｲlanica, pred njegovim spre-jetjem pregleda Komisija in druge dr™ave ｲlanice (razen izjem,
This sanctioning of the principle of the non-applicability to third parties of national technical regulations which have not been noti«ed,supportsthepositionwhichhadbeenalreadyadopted by the Commission in 1986 and enhances the pro-tection of the interests of private individuals and enterprises in this respect.
Tako kaznovanje v zvezi z naｲelom neuporabnosti nepriglaþe-nih nacionalnih tehniｲnih predpisov za tretje stranke je v pod-poro staliþｲu, ki ga je Komisija ™e sprejela leta 1986, in krepi ustrezno zaþｲito interesov posameznikov in podjetij.
Communication from the Commission concerning the non-respect of certain provisions of Directive 83/189/EEC, No 86/C 245/05, published in OJ C 245, 1.10.1986, p. 4.
Sporoｲilo Komisije v zvezi z neupoþtevanjem nekaterih doloｲb Direktive 83/189/EGS, þt. 86/C 245/05, objavljeno v UL C 245, 1.10.1986, str. 4.
C o n c l uffs i o n role in the case of national authorities, notably as regards the need to make a clear legal distinction between operators act-ing under the freedom of establishment and those only wish-ing to provide crossborder services.
Z a k lj u ｲ e k svobodo ustanavljanja, in tistimi, ki ™elijo samo zagotoviti ｲezmejne storitve.
In the context of the 2005 renewed Lisbon strategy and as part of its Better Regulation programme, the Commission an-nounced its intention to launch a comprehensive initiative to ensure that the regulatory framework in the EU meets the re-quirements of the twenty-«rstcentury.Closercooperationwiththe Member States to ensure that better regulation principles are applied consistently throughout the EU and the reinforce-ment of the constructive dialogue between all regulators at the EU and national level and with stakeholders were identi«edaskey action lines in this respect.
To je med drugim razvidno iz vkljuｲitve klavzule vzajemnega priznavanja v nekatere osnutke nacionalnih zakonodajnih be-sedil na stopnji priglaþanja; dobre volje, ki jo dr™ave ｲlanice ka-™ejo pri popravljanju napak, ki jih odkrije Komisija ali druge dr-™ave ｲlanice v priglaþenih osnutkih; skladnosti v veｲini primerov z obveznostjo priglaþanja naｲrtovanih novih standardizacijskih dejavnosti in osnutkov tehniｲnih predpisov ter iz hitrega razvoja evropske standardizacije.
This is evident, among other things, from the inclusion of the mutual recognition clause in certain draft national legislative texts at the n o t i « c a t i o n s t a g e ; t h effg o o d w i l l s h o w n b y t h e Mffe mb e r States in correcting errors discovered by the Commission or by the other Member States in noti«eddrafts;thecompli-ance in the vast majority of cases with the obligation to notify planned new standardisation activities and draft technical reg-ulations; and from the rapid development of European stand-ardisation.
Komisija je v okviru prenovljene lizbonske strategije iz leta 2005 in kot del programa za pripravo boljþih predpisov naznanila svojo namero o pobudi za zagotovitev, da ureditveni okvir Ev-ropske unije izpolnjuje zahteve 21. stoletja. Podroｲja, kot sta tesnejþe sodelovanje z dr™avami ｲlanicami, da bi se naｲela o boljþih predpisih uporabljala dosledno po vsej EU, in krepitev konstruktivnega dialoga med regulativnimi organi na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni ter interesnimi skupinami, so bila opre-deljena kot kljuｲna podroｲja delovanja.
In more or less 95% of the cases where the Commission reacted in order to bring the national draft regulations into conformity with Community law, Member States agreed to carry out the necessary changes and to align their legislation with EC law, thus avoiding the launching of the more cumbersome infringe-ment procedures by the Commission.
Dr™ave ｲlanice so v 95 odstotkih vseh primerov, kjer se je Komi-sija odzvala, da bi se osnutki nacionalnih predpisov uskladili z zakonodajo Skupnosti, bolj ali manj soglaþale, da bodo izvedle potrebne spremembe in uskladile svojo zakonodajo s pravom ES ter se tako izognile nadle™nejþim postopkom ugotavljanja krþitev, ki jih uvede Komisija.
The cooperation and dis-cussion fostered between Member States through the 98/34 procedure is evidenced by the fact that between 2002 and 2004, for instance, Member States exchanged 230 detailed opinions
Sodelovanje in razprava med dr™avami ｲlanicami v skladu s postopkom iz 98/34 je raz-vidno iz dejstva, da so dr™ave ｲlanice med letoma 2002 in 2004 izmenjale 230 podrobnih mnenj.
It is clear from a review of more than twenty years' experience with the implementation of the N o t i « c a t i o n P r o c e d u r e d u r i n g w h i c h time the Commission has screened more than 10.000 draft national measures that signi«cantprogresshasbeenmade in preventing the emergence of new barriers to trade, simultaneously saving onerous legal, administrative and eco-nomic costs.
Pregled veｲ kot dvajsetletnih izkuþenj z izvajanjem postopka priglaþanja, med katerim je Komisija pregledala veｲ kot 10 000 osnutkov nacionalnih ukrepov, je pokazal, da je bil narejen ve-lik napredek pri prepreｲevanju pojava novih ovir v trgovini in s tem tudi prihranek veｲjih pravnih, upravnih in ekonomskih stroþkov.
In this respect the 98/34 Noti«cationproceduremay be considered a precursor for better regulation as it has proved to be an e.ectiveinstrumentofindustrialpolicyandcompetitiveness which has created various channels of com-munication between all the main stakeholders.
Postopek priglaþanja v skladu z Direktivo 98/34 se tako lahko þteje za predhodnika boljþih predpisov, ker se je iz-kazal za uｲinkovito sredstvo industrijske politike in konkurenｲ-nosti pri vzpostavitvi razliｲnih poti komuniciranja med vsemi glavnimi interesnimi skupinami.
Consequently, it represents a model of regulatory transparency and adminis-trative cooperation whose scope of application might be fur-ther extended and provide similar bene«tsinothersectors.
Zato predstavlja vzorec nor-mativne preglednosti in upravnega sodelovanja, katerega obseg uporabe se lahko nadalje razþiri in zagotovi podobne ugodnosti na drugih podroｲjih.
This progress in European integration, which facilitates the maintenance and growth of trade, is the fruit of the joint e.ortsof the Commission and the Member States.
Ta napredek pri evropskem povezovanju, ki lajþa vzdr™evanje in rast trgovine, je plod skupnih naporov Komisije in dr™av ｲlanic.
By acting together to prevent the emergence of new technical barriers to trade, they reduce the need for legislation on a Community level, and at the same time enhance the quality of the technical stand-ards and regulations adopted at national level.
Zaradi skupnega delovanja pri prepreｲevanju novih tehniｲnih ovir v trgovini se zmanjþa potreba po zakonodaji na ravni Skup-nosti in hkrati poveｲa kakovost tehniｲnih standardov in pred-pisov, sprejetih na nacionalni ravni.
Directive 98/34/EC is the key instrument of Community policy to combat barri-ers to trade which has made this possible.
Kljuｲni instrument politike Skupnosti v boju proti oviram v trgovini, ki to omogoｲa, je Direktiva 98/34/ES.
Although the completion of the internal market in 1993 does not appear to have diminished Member States' need to enact detailed legislation on products, they have become gradually familiar with the rules of the internal market, the principle of mutual recognition arising from the `Cassis de Dijon' precedent and the principles of transparency and co-operation, which now govern their activities in the «eldoftechnicalstandardsand regulations.
Peprav se zdi, da oblikovanje notranjega trga leta 1993 ni zmanjþalo potreb dr™av ｲlanic, da sprejmejo podrobno zakono-dajo o proizvodih, so se dr™ave ｲlanice postopno seznanile s predpisi notranjega trga, naｲelom vzajemnega priznavanja, ki izhaja iz precedenｲnega primera ¶Cassis de Dijonƒ, in naｲeloma preglednosti in sodelovanja, ki zdaj urejajo njihove dejavnosti na podroｲju tehniｲnih standardov in predpisov.
Similarly, even if more recently, in the area of services this mechanism has played an important educational
Ta mehanizem je pred kratkim odigral pomembno vlogo na podroｲju storitev v primeru nacionalnih organov, zlasti glede potrebe po jasnem pravnem razlikovanju med subjekti, ki delujejo v skladu s
Despite its success, the procedure laid down by Directive 98/34/EC could still be improved.
Kar zadeva standarde, evropski organi za standardizacijo kot pomanjkljivosti pri pregledovanju priglasitev najpogosteje omenjajo pozne priglasitve in vｲasih nedoloｲne opise novih predmetov.
This requires clear identi«cationof the points in need of improvement.
Tudi þtevilo pripomb, ki jih predlo™ijo nacionalni
in defending their legitimate interests by informing the Commis-sion or the national authorities about certain drafts which, if adopted, would create technical barriers.
organi za standardizacijo, ostaja zelo nizko v primerjavi s þtevi-lom prejetih priglasitev.
The involvement of in-dividual enterprises and particularly small and medium-sized businesses, which are often more reserved, could be improved.
To je znak, da gospodarski subjekti v Uniji þe vedno ne izkoristijo vseh svojih mo™nosti, da dajo pripombe k besedilom, ki morebiti ogro™ajo zadovoljivo delovanje notranjega trga.
They should not hesitate to seek information and speak up, even in a con«dentialway,whentheyconsiderthatthetechnicalprod-uct speci«cationsbeingpreparedincountriestowhichtheyex-port could harm their interests, if adopted as they stand.
Kadar menijo, da bi lahko speci«kacijeteh-niｲnega izdelka, ki se pripravljajo v dr™avah, v katere izva™ajo, þkodovale njihovim interesom, ｲe bi bile sprejete take, kot so, morajo takoj poiskati informacije in o tem spregovoriti tudi zaupno.
As far as standards are concerned, late noti«cationsandsome-times rather vague descriptions of new work are the shortcom-ings most frequently mentioned by the European standardisa-tion bodies when examining the noti«cations.Inaddition,thenumber of comments submitted by the national standardisa-tion bodies remains very low in comparison with the number of noti«cationsreceived.Thisisasignthateconomicoperatorsin the Union are still not making full use of their opportunities to express objections to texts which constitute a potential threat to the satisfactory operation of the internal market.
Zdi se, da je to zato, ker se evropski organi za standardizacijo þe vedno ne morejo v celoti zanesti na pomoｲ nacionalnih orga-nov pri tem, da na nacionalni ravni organizirajo najþirþe mo™no razþirjanje informacij o osnutkih standardov v pripravi v drugih dr™avah ｲlanicah, da bi spodbudili pripombe ali sodelovanje proizvajalcev na njihovem podroｲju dejavnosti. Pe je industrija pozorna in zahteva potrebne informacije iz ustreznih podroｲij, lahko sama prispeva k uｲinkovitejþemu kro™enju informacij, kajti izra™anje njenih potreb bi lahko po potrebi spodbudilo uvedbo ustreznih informacijskih povezav.
The Commission has taken some important steps to facilitate the participation of industry.
Komisija je sprejela nekaj pomembnih ukrepov, da bi olajþala sodelovanje industrije.
In principle, noti«eddraftsaretranslated into all Community languages and are then available free of charge to the public on the Europa site, via the TRIS (Technical Regulations Information System) database.
Naｲeloma so priglaþeni osnutki preve-deni v vse jezike Skupnosti in so prosto na voljo javnosti na spletni strani Europa prek podatkovne zbirke TRIS (Informacij-ski sistem za tehniｲne predpise).
Further-more, the Commission has set up an automatic alert system to which the public may subscribe.
Komisija je tudi vzpostavila samodejni sistem opozarjanja, v katerega se javnost lahko vｲla-ni.
This permits economic opera-tors to be automatically n o t i « e d b y T R I S v i a e - m a i l a s s o o n a s a n e w n o t i « e d t e x t i s r e c e i v e d i n t h e p r o d u c t o r I n f o r m a t i o n S o - c i e t y services category or categories selected.
To omogoｲa gospodarskim subjektom, da jih TRIS prek elek-tronske poþte samodejno opozori, takoj ko je prejeto novo pri-glaþeno besedilo v kategoriji proizvoda ali storitev informacijske dru™be ali izbranih kategorijah.
Directive 98/34/EC is at a turning point: the adoption of Direc-tive 98/48/EC on Information Society services and the acces-sion of ten new Member States to the Union on 1 May 2004 have radically changed the application of the legislation, the geographical scope of which will continue to expand.
Direktiva 98/34/ES je na toｲki preobrata: sprejetje Direktive 98/48/ES o storitvah informacijske dru™be in pristop desetih novih dr™av ｲlanic k Uniji 1. maja 2004 sta korenito spremenila uporabo zakonodaje, katere geografski obseg se bo þe naprej þiril.
With regard to the procedure for the provision of information applicable to technical regulations and rules on Information Society services, experience has shown that in some cases Member States are failing to notify their drafts, in breach of the provisions of the Directive, or applying some of these provi-sions erroneously as a result of insu/cientknowledgeoftheprocedure on the part of the bodies responsible for preparing the texts of these regulations.
V zvezi s postopkom zagotavljanja informacij, ki se uporablja za tehniｲne predpise in predpise o storitvah informacijske dru™be, so izkuþnje pokazale, da v nekaterih primerih dr™ave ｲlanice ne priglasijo svojih osnutkov, pri ｲemer krþijo doloｲbe Direktive ali napaｲno uporabijo te doloｲbe, ker organi, odgovorni za pripra-vo besedil teh predpisov, niso dovolj seznanjeni s postopkom.
The Commission intends to pur-sue its information activities in this area, in particular through enhanced dialogue with the national authorities.
Komisija namerava nadaljevati s svojimi dejavnostmi obveþｲa-nja na tem podroｲju, zlasti prek okrepljenega dialoga z nacio-nalnimi organi.
The Commission appreciates industry's increased participation in the examination of draft measures.
Komisija ceni veｲje sodelovanje industrije pri pregledovanju osnutkov ukrepov.
Some European federations exercise a high degree of `legislative vigilance' and are very active
Nekatera evropska zdru™enja imajo visoko stopnjo ¶zakonodajnega nadzoraƒ in zelo dejavno branijo svoje legitimne interese tako, da obveþｲajo Komisijo ali nacionalne organe o nekaterih osnutkih, ki bi povzroｲili tehniｲne ovire, ｲe bi bili sprejeti. Lahko bi se izboljþalo sodelovanje posameznih
The next big challenge concerns the probable extension of the 98/34 N o t i « c a t i o n P r o c e d u r e .
Naslednja velika sprememba zadeva verjetno þiritev postopka priglaþanja iz Direktive 98/34.
F o l l o w i n g a C o m m i s s i o n R e po r t w h i c h analysed barriers to the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establishment in the Internal Market, the Commission is currently working on a proposal concerning the possible extension of Directive 98/34/EC to cover services oth-er than Information Society services in order to ensure that this increasingly important and largely predominant area of the EC economy will no longer fall outside the preventive control set up by this procedure.
V skladu s poroｲilom Komisije, ki je analiziralo ovire za svobodo zagotavljanja storitev in svobo-do ustanavljanja na notranjem trgu, Komisija zdaj dela na predlogu morebitne þiritve Direktive 98/34/ES, ki naj bi zajela druge storitve, razen storitev informacijske dru™be, da bi zago-tovila, da to vedno pomembnejþe in prevladujoｲe podroｲje gospodarstva ES ne bo veｲ zunaj preventivnega nadzora, vzpostavljenega s tem postopkom.
Case C-390/99, Canal Satïlite Digital, Case C-159/00, Sapod Audic v. Eco-Emballages, with annotation by M. Dougan, by Michael DOUGAN, Vol.
Zadeva C-390/99, Canal Satïlite Digital, Zadeva C-159/00, Sapod Audic proti Eco-Emballages, z opombo M. Dougana, Michael DOUGAN, zvezek 40, þt. 1, februar 2003, str. 193›218.
Le mïcanisme de transparence rïglementaire en matiòre de services de la sociïtï de l'information instaurï par la directive 98/48/CE, by Salvatore D'ACUNTO, No 4-1998, Editions Clïment Juglar, Paris.
Resolucija Sveta z dne 21. decembra 1989 o globalnem pristopu k oceni skladnosti (UL C 10, 16.1.1990, str.1).
(in chronological order)
(v kronoloþkem zaporedju)
Council Directive 90/387/EEC of 28 June 1990 on the establish-ment of the internal market for telecommunications services through the implementation of open network provision, (OJ L 192, 24.7.1990, p. 1).
Direktiva Sveta 92/59/EGS z dne 29. junija 1992 o sploþni varnosti proizvodov (UL L 228, 11.8.1992, str.
Council Directive 65/65/EEC of 26 January 1965 on the approxi-mation of provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administra-tive Action relating to proprietary medicinal products (OJ 22, 9.2.1965, p.
Direktiva Sveta 65/65/EGS z dne 26. januarja 1965 o pribli™evanju doloｲb zakonov in drugih predpisov v zvezi z lastniþkimi zdravili (UL 22, 9.2.1965, str.
369/65), repealed by Directive 2001/83/EC of 6 No-vember 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67).
369/65), ki jo razveljavlja Direktiva 2001/83/ES z dne 6. novembra 2001 o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v humani medicini (UL L 311, 28.11.2001, str. 67).
Council Regulation EC 315/93 of 8 February 1993 relating to the establishment of Community procedures regarding contaminat-ing substances in foodstu.s (OJ L 37, 13.2.1993, p. 1).
Uredba Sveta ES 315/93 z dne 8. februarja 1993 o doloｲitvi postop-kov Skupnosti za kontaminate v hrani (UL L 37, 13.2.1993, str. 1).
Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approxima-tion of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classi«cation,packagingandlabellingofdangeroussub-stances (OJ 196, 16.8.1967, p.
Direktiva Sveta 67/548/EGS z dne 27. junija 1967 o pribli™eva-nju zakonov in drugih predpisov v zvezi z razvrþｲanjem, pakira-njem in oznaｲevanjem nevarnih snovi (UL 196, 16.8.1967, str.
1) and subsequent amend-ments.
1) in poznejþe spremembe.
Council Regulation 793/93/EEC of 23 March 1993 on the evalua-tion and control of the risks of existing substances (OJ L 84, 5.4.1993, p.
Uredba Sveta 793/93/EGS z dne 23. marca 1993 o oceni in nadzoru tveganja, ki ga predstavljajo obstojeｲe snovi (UL L 84, 5.4.1993, str.
1) as amended by Council Regulation 1882/2003 of 29 September 2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).
1), kot jo spreminja Uredba Sveta 1882/2003 z dne 29. sep-tembra 2003 (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).
Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approxima-tion of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic prod-ucts (OJ L 262, 27.9.1976, p. 169).
Direktiva Sveta 76/768/EGS z dne 27. julija 1976 o pribli™evanju zakonodaje dr™av ｲlanic v zvezi s kozmetiｲnimi izdelki (UL L 262, 27.9.1976, str. 169).
Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonisation and standards (OJ C 136, 4.6.1985, p. 1).
27), razveljavljena z Direktivo 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih «nanｲnih instrumentov (UL L 145, 30.4.2004, str. 1).
Council Directive 93/43/EEC of 14 June 1993 on the hygiene of food-stu.s (OJ L 175, 19.7.1993, p. 1).
Direktiva Sveta 93/43/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993 o higieni ™ivil (UL L 175, 19.7.1993, str. 1).