natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EU citizens and their family members who have the right of permanent residence enjoy increased protection against expulsion as they can be expelled only on serious grounds of public policy or public security.
Državljani EU in njihovi družinski člani, ki imajo pravico do stalnega prebivališča, uživajo dodatno varstvo pred izgonom, saj so lahko izgnani le iz resnih razlogov, povezanih z javnim redom ali javno varnostjo.
When it comes to those EU citizens who have resided in the host EU country for the previous 10 years or are minors [i.e. under the age of 18], the expulsion can be justified only on imperative grounds of public security (in the case of minors a removal may also be justified when it is necessary for the best interests of the child).
V primeru državljanov EU, ki so prebivali v državi EU gostiteljici preteklih 10 let ali ki so mladoletne osebe (tj. mlajše od 18 let), izgon upravičujejo le nujni razlogi, povezani z javno varnostjo (v primeru mladoletnih oseb je izgon lahko upravičen tudi, kadar je potreben zaradi koristi otroka).
When it comes to public health, only the most serious infectious diseases can justify measures restricting freedom of movement.
V zvezi z javnim zdravjem lahko ukrepe, ki omejujejo pravico do svobode gibanja, upravičijo le najhujše nalezljive bolezni.
Where there are serious indications that it is necessary, you may, within three months of the date of arrival, be required to undergo a medical examination, free of charge.
Če za to obstajajo resni razlogi, se lahko v treh mesecih od datuma prihoda od vas zahteva, da opravite brezplačen zdravniški pregled.
In any case, diseases occurring after a three-month period from the date of arrival do not constitute grounds for expulsion.
V nobenem primeru pa bolezni, ki se pojavijo po treh mesecih od datuma prihoda, niso podlaga za izgon.
EU citizens and their family members are also protected by the following procedural safeguards.
Državljane EU in njihove družinske člane prav tako varujejo nekatera postopkovna jamstva.
Written notification and appeal If expelled or denied entry, the decision must:
Pisno obvestilo in pritožba V primeru izgona ali zavrnitve vstopa je treba pri odločbi upoštevati naslednje:
• be notified in writing and in a way that enables the person concerned to comprehend its content and the implications for them;• include precise and full information of the grounds on which the decision is based; and • specify the court or administrative authority with which the person concerned may lodge an appeal and the time limit for the appeal.
• zadevna oseba mora biti o njej obveščena pisno ter na način, da lahko razume njeno vsebino in posledice;• vključevati mora natančne in popolne informacije o razlogih za njeno sprejetje ter• v njej mora biti navedeno tudi sodišče ali upravni organ, pri katerem lahko zadevna oseba vloži pritožbo, ter rok za pritožbo.
Access to judicial redress
Dostop do sodnega varstva
The persons concerned must have access to judicial and where appropriate administrative redress procedures to appeal or seek review of any decision against them on these grounds.
Prizadete osebe morajo imeti dostop do postopkov sodnega in, če je potrebno, upravnega varstva, da se lahko pritožijo ali zahtevajo ponovno obravnavo katere koli odločitve zoper njih na tej podlagi.
These procedures must allow for an examination of the legality of the decision, as well as of the facts and circumstances on which the proposed measure is based.
Ti postopki morajo dopuščati presojo zakonitosti odločbe, pa tudi dejstev in okoliščin, na katerih temelji predlagani ukrep.
If the application for appeal is accompanied by an application for an interim order to suspend enforcement of that decision, actual removal from the territory cannot take place as a general rule until the decision on the interim order is taken.
Kadar je poleg pritožbenega zahtevka zoper odločbo o izgonu vložena tudi vloga za začasno odredbo, ki bi zaustavila izvršbo takšne odločbe, se dejanska odstranitev z ozemlja na splošno ne sme izvršiti, dokler ni sprejeta odločitev o začasni odredbi.
Expulsion as a legal consequence of a custodial penalty
Izgon kot stranska kazen k zaporni kazni
An expulsion order can be issued as a penalty or legal consequence of a custodial penalty.
Lahko se izda odredba o izgonu kot kazen ali stranska kazen k zaporni kazni.
If an order is issued for this purpose but is enforced more than two years after it was issued, the host EU country is obliged to:
Če se taka odredba izda, vendar se izvrši v več kot dveh letih po njeni izdaji, mora država EU gostiteljica:
• check that the person concerned is currently and genuinely a threat to public policy or public security before expelling them; and • assess whether there has been a material change in the circumstances before expelling them or their family member.
• pred izgonom preveriti, ali zadevna oseba dejansko in resnično predstavlja grožnjo za javni red ali javno varnost, ter • oceniti, ali so se morda zgodile pomembne spremembe okoliščin, preden izžene zadevno osebo ali njene družinske člane.Prepoved prebivanja
Expelled EU citizens and their family members may also be excluded on grounds of public policy or public security but they can apply for lifting of this ban on entry after a reasonable period of time, and in any event after three years from enforcement of the final exclusion order.
Izgnanim državljanom EU in njihovim družinskim članom se prav tako lahko prepove prebivanje iz razlogov, povezanih z javnim redom ali javno varnostjo, vendar lahko zaprosijo za odpravo prepovedi prebivanja po razumnem času, v vsakem primeru pa po treh letih od izvršitve dokončne prepovedi prebivanja.
Abuse and fraud
Zlorabe in goljufije
EU countries may adopt the necessary measures to refuse, terminate or withdraw any right conferred by the Directive in the case of abuse of rights or fraud, such as marriages of convenience or forged documentation.
Države EU lahko sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zavrnitev, prenehanje ali preklic katere koli pravice, podeljene z Direktivo, v primeru zlorabe pravic ali goljufije, kot so navidezne zakonske zveze ali ponarejene listine.
You can find the precise legal wording on the matter covered in this section in Chapter VI (Articles 27 to 33) and Article 35 of the Directive.
Natančno pravno besedilo o temi tega poglavja zajemata Poglavje VI (členi 27–33) in člen 35 Direktive.
C ha p t workers
Prehodne v je ureditve za o g l a P delavce
Transitional arrangements on free movement of workers
Prehodne ureditve na področju prostega pretoka delavcev
EU countries can temporarily restrict access to their labour markets of nationals from countries which joined the EU in 2004 and 2007: as the transitional arrangements allow them to delay the application of EU law on free movement of workers guaranteeing free access to employment, they can instead apply national rules.
Države EU lahko državljanom držav, ki so se EU pridružile v letih 2004 oziroma 2007, začasno omejijo dostop do svojih trgov dela, saj jim prehodne ureditve omogočajo odlog uporabe prava EU o prostem pretoku delavcev, ki zagotavlja prost dostop do zaposlitve, in namesto tega uporabo nacionalnih pravil.
As a consequence, workers from the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (until 30 April 2011 at the latest), Romania and Bulgaria (until 31 December 2013 at the latest) can be required to obtain a work permit in order to take up employment in one of the other EU countries.
Zato se od delavcev iz Češke, Estonije, Latvije, Litve, Madžarske, Poljske, Slovenije in Slovaške (najpozneje do 30. aprila 2011) ter iz Romunije in Bolgarije (najpozneje do 31. decembra 2013), ki se želijo zaposliti v eni od držav EU, lahko zahteva, da za to pridobijo delovno dovoljenje.
As a further consequence, EU countries may also derogate from some specific provisions on the right of residence of EU workers but only where this is necessary.
Poleg tega lahko države EU odstopajo od nekaterih posebnih določb o pravici do prebivanja delavcev EU, vendar samo v nujnih primerih.
For example, an EU country that requires registration with the relevant authorities for periods of residence longer than three months could require workers from the above countries who need to obtain a work permit to produce this work permit, in addition to the confirmation of engagement from the employer or a certificate of employment.
Država EU, ki zahteva prijavo pri pristojnih organih za obdobja prebivanja, ki so daljša od treh mesecev, lahko na primer od delavcev iz navedenih držav, ki potrebujejo delovno dovoljenje, zahteva, da poleg potrdila delodajalca o nameravani zaposlitvi delavca ali potrdila o zaposlitvi predložijo tudi to delovno dovoljenje.
Where to find more information?
Kje poiskati dodatne informacije?
If you need to find more information on whether the EU country you would like to work in restricts access to its labour market or on the working and living conditions, please go to the official website http://ec.europa.eu/eures where you can find comprehensive information on free movement of workers.
Dodatne informacije o tem, ali država EU, v kateri želite delati, omejuje dostop do svojega trga dela ali glede delovnih in življenjskih pogojev v njej, lahko poiščete na uradni spletni strani http://ec.europa.eu/eures, kjer so na voljo obsežne informacije o prostem pretoku delavcev.
You can also consult the Commission’s Guide to working in another EU country produced by the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, which is available to download at http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=25 & langId=en & pubId=215 & type=2 & furtherPubs=yes
Lahko si ogledate tudi vodnik Komisije o delu v drugi državi EU, ki ga je pripravil Generalni direktorat za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in enake možnosti in je na voljo na spletni strani http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=25 & langId=sl & pubId=215 & type=2 & furtherPubs=yes
How to protect your rights
Kako lahko zavarujete o g l a P svoje pravice
Where can you find more information?
Kje lahko najdete več informacij?
What can you do if you think your rights have not been upheld?
Kaj lahko naredite, če menite, da vaše pravice niso bile spoštovane?
Where to get free information?
Kje so na voljo brezplačne informacije?
For further information about your rights to free movement and residence, you can consult the European Commission’s online information portal, Your Europe: http://ec.europa.eu/youreurope
Dodatne informacije o vaših pravicah do prostega gibanja in prebivanja so na voljo na informacijskem portalu Evropske komisije Tvoja Evropa:http://ec.europa.eu/youreurope
You may also wish to consult the website of the European Commission’s Directorate-General Justice at http://ec.europa.eu/about/ds_en.htm
Lahko si ogledate tudi spletno stran Generalnega direktorata za pravosodje Evropske komisije: http://ec.europa.eu/about/ds_sl.htm
If you would like to access EU legislation on free movement, you can visit the European Commission’s online access portal to EU law, EUR-Lex at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm
Do zakonodaje EU o prostem gibanju in prava EU na splošno lahko dostopate na portalu Evropske komisije EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/sl/index.htm
If you think that your right to move and reside freely has been violated, you should appeal before the competent national courts or administrative bodies.
Če menite, da je bila vaša pravica do prostega gibanja in prebivanja kršena, se pritožite pri pristojnih nacionalnih sodiščih ali upravnih organih.
Please note that national courts are the only body that can award you damages or order a body to do or stop doing something.
Nacionalna sodišča so edini organi, ki vam lahko dodelijo odškodnino ali ki lahko drugim organom odredijo, da kaj naredijo ali opustijo.
You should contact a local solicitor for assistance.
Za pomoč se obrnite na lokalnega pravnega svetovalca.
Responses are provided free of charge, within 8 calendar days, and in any of the official languages of the European Union.
vprašanja dobite brezplačno v osmih koledarskih dneh in v katerem koli uradnem jeziku Evropske unije.
For more information, please go to http://ec.europa.eu/citizensrights
Več informacij je na voljo na spletni strani http://ec.europa.eu/citizensrights
If you think that your problem was caused because national public authorities incorrectly applied their own national and also EU law, you can use the SOLVIT system, an online problem solving network in which EU countries work together to solve problems without legal proceedings.
Če menite, da so vaše težave posledica neustrezne uporabe nacionalnega prava vaše države in tudi prava EU s strani državnih organov, lahko uporabite sistem SOLVIT, ki je elektronski sistem za reševanje problemov, v okviru katerega države EU sodelujejo z namenom reševanja težav brez pravnih postopkov.
For more information, please go to http://ec.europa.eu/solvit
Več informacij je na voljo na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/solvit
If you consider that your EU rights have not been upheld and have exhausted the above means of redress, you can also lodge your complaint with the European Commission at http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/your_rights/your_rights_forms_en.htm
Če menite, da pravice, ki jih imate kot državljan EU, niso bile spoštovane, in ste uporabili že vsa navedena pravna sredstva, lahko vložite pritožbo pri Evropski komisiji, in sicer na spletni strani http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/your_rights/your_rights_forms_sl.htm
You are also entitled to lodge a petition with the European Parliament.
Lahko tudi vložite peticijo Evropskemu parlamentu. Za to obiščite spletno stran http://www.europarl.europa.eu/parliament/public/staticDisplay.do?id=49 & language=SL
This brochure is the result of a number of recent initiatives, including the « n a l e v a l u a t i o nffo f t h e D a p h n e p r o g r a m mffe c a r r i e d out between May and October 2003.
Ta broþura je plod razliｲnih del, ki so bila pred kratkim zakljuｲena, med njimi tudi konｲnega ocenjevanja programa Daphne, ki je potekalo med majem in oktobrom 2003.
This brochure is also largely indebted to Dr June Kane for her extensive detailed knowledge gained during monitoring visits to many Daphne projects.
Zahvala za priｲujoｲo broþuro gre v veliki meri tudi dr. June Kane, ki je med spremljanjem programa pridobila obse™no in poglobljeno znanje na tem podroｲju.
Europe Direct is a service to help you «ndanswersto your questions about the European Union
Europe Direct je slu™ba za pomoｲ pri odgovorih na vpraþanja v zvezi z Evropsko unijo
Freephone number:
Brezplaｲna telefonska þtevilka
A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet.
Veliko dodatnih informacij o Evropski uniji je na voljo na internetu. Dostop je mo™en na stre™niku Europa (http://europa.eu.int).
Ç European Communities, 2005 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
Ç Evropske skupnosti, 2005 Ponatis je dovoljen samo skupaj z navedbo vira.
The future: the Daphne II programme 2004›08
Kratka zgodovina programa Daphne
Aims and priorities
Cilji in prednostne naloge
The results of the Daphne experience
Rezultati izkuþenj, pridobljenih v programu Daphne
A brief history of Daphne
Kratka zgodovina programa Daphne
Raison d'ðtre and the April 1997 hearing
Nastanek in obravnava aprila 1997
On 11 April 1997, representatives of 30 non-governmental organisations (NGOs), Members of the European Parliament, European Commission sta.members,law-enforcementrepresent-atives and individuals with expertise in the area of child protection gathered in Brussels for a hearing on the subjects of tra/ckingandsexualexploitationofchildren.
11. aprila 1997 so se v Bruslju zbrali predstavniki 30 nevladnih organizacij (NVO), ｲlani Evrop-skega parlamenta, osebje Evropske komisije, predstavniki organov pregona in strokovnjaki s podroｲja zaþｲite otrok, da bi obravnavali problematiko trgovanja z otroki in spolnega zlorab-ljanja otrok.
The hearing was one element of a broad-ranging response from the Commission to the events of 1996 that had shaken Europe and galvanised public and political opinion.
Obravnava je bila le eden izmed ukrepov v okviru obse™nega odziva Komisije na dogodke iz leta 1996, ki so pretresli Evropo in razdelili javno in politiｲno mnenje.
The discovery of the bodies of a number of missing girls in premises in Belgium in late summer 1996 raised questions about what Europe could do to protect children from those who wished to abuse or exploit them for p r o « t .
Odkritje trupel pogre-þanih deklet na razliｲnih lokacijah v Belgiji pozno poleti 1996 je spro™ilo mnoga vpraþanja glede tega, kaj lahko stori Evropa za zaþｲito otrok pred tistimi, ki jih hoｲejo zlorabljati ali iz-koriþｲati v komercialne namene.
T h e « r s t W o r l d Cffo n g r e s s a g a i n s t Cffo m mffe r c i a l S e x u a l E x p l o i t a t i o nffo f C h i l d r e n , held in Stockholm in August that same year, provided more information on such issues and, in a Declaration and Agenda for Action, suggested some possible actions that could be taken.
Prvi svetovni kongres proti spolnemu zlorabljanju otrok v komercialne namene, ki je potekal v Stockholmu avgusta 1997, je prispeval dodatne informa-cije v zvezi s temi vpraþanji in v deklaraciji in akcijskem programu predlagal nekatere mo™ne ukrepe.
In an aide-memoire to the Commission following the World Congress (
Anita Gradin, komisarka, ki je posebej odgovorna za usklajevanje dejavnosti Komisije pro-ti trgovanju z otroki in spolnemu izkoriþｲanju otrok, je v memorandumu Komisiji, ki je nastal
`the Commission endorses the analysis made in Stockholm concerning the existence of mul-tiple, in many respects interlinked, factors of an economic, social, cultural and political nature which conspire to create an environment leading to the sexual exploitation of chil-dren'.
¶Komisija se strinja z v Stockholmu opravljeno analizo, ki zadeva obstoj raznovrstnih, v veｲ pogledih med seboj povezanih dejavnikov ekonomske, socialne, kulturne in politiｲne na-rave, ki zdru™eni pripomorejo k oblikovanju okolja, v katerem prihaja do spolnega zlorab-ljanja otrokƒ.
`subscribes entirely to the Declaration adopted in Stockholm, calling for ``concerted action at national, regional and international level'', which presupposes the mobilisation of all the part-ners involved (national public authorities, international agencies, NGOs and private associa-tions, civil society and the tourism industry) as well as the provision of the necessary funding. In this connection, the EU, through the European institutions, has a responsibility to bear in com-bating this scourge within its borders„'.
¶v celoti soglaþa z deklaracijo, sprejeto v Stockholmu, in zahteva ,usklajeno delovanje na dr™avni, regionalni in mednarodni ravni`, ki predpostavlja mobilizacijo vseh vpletenih part-nerjev (dr™avnih javnih organov, mednarodnih agencij, NVO, zasebnih zdru™enj, civilne dru™be in turistiｲne industrije) ter zagotavljanje potrebnih «nanｲnihsredstev.Stemvzve-zi nosi tudi EU, prek Evropskih institucij, odgovornost v boju proti tej nadlogi znotraj njenih meja „ƒ
The Commissioner presented a number of new measures in f u l « l mffe n t o f t h e S t o c k h o l m A g e n - d a for Action, including a communication on tra/ckinginwomenandgirlsforthepurpose
Komisarka je predstavila þtevilne nove ukrepe za izpolnjevanje akcijskega programa iz Stock-holma, vkljuｲno s sporoｲilom o trgovanju z ™enskami in dekleti v namene spolnega izkoriþｲa- nj a 2
) Contribution of the of sexual exploitation (2
, sporoｲilom o boju proti spolnemu turizmu, ki izrablja otroke3
) and draft rec- ommendations to Member States; a Green Paper on new audiovisual services such as the
, in osnutki priporoｲil dr™a-
European Union to intensifying the #ghtagainst the sexual abuse and exploitation of children (SG/T/TLM/md D(96)II), aide-memoire presented by Commissioner Gradin (Brussels, 25 September 1996).
1 vam ｲlanicam, zeleno knjigo o novih avdiovizualnih medijih, kot na primer internetu, ter spo- roｲilom o þkodljivih in nezakonitih vsebinah na internetu.4
Commissioner Gradin's presentation emphasised the vital role to be played in combating sexual violence against children by NGOs and public authorities, and the urgent need for centralisation of data, the encouragement of informal forums for exchange of experience at European level, movement towards consensus on legal and programmatic guidelines, and improved targeting and assessment of measures to be taken and « n a n c e d b y t h e E U i t s e l f .
V svoji predstavitvi je komisarka Gradin poudarila kljuｲno vlogo, ki jo imajo nevladne organi-zacije (NVO) in javni organi v boju proti spolnemu nasilju nad otroki, ter nujno potrebo po centralizaciji podatkov, spodbujanju neformalnih forumov za izmenjavo izkuþenj na evropski ravni, pomikanju v smeri soglasja glede zakonskih in programskih smernic ter boljþe izbiranje in vrednotenje ukrepov, ki naj jih sprejme in « n a n c i r a s a m a E U .
The April 1997 hearing was therefore called to seek the views of grassroots organisations on how European-level cooperation and exchange could function and where the focus of e.orts
Obravnava aprila 1997 je bila torej sklicana z namenom, da se poiþｲe staliþｲa lokalnih organi-zacij o tem, kako uspeþno bi lahko bilo sodelovanje oziroma izmenjava na evropski ravni ter
A brief history of Daphne
Kratka zgodovina programa Daphne na katera podroｲja bi se bilo treba osredotoｲiti.
( 5 should be placed. A moderator was provided by the Unicef Regional O / c e f o r E u r op e (5), and the conclusions of the hearing were to feed into a new initiative to be launched by the Com-mission s p e c i « c a l l y t op r o m o t e N G O a c t i o n .
Regionalni urad UNICEF-a za Evropo5 je pri- skrbel moderatorja, zakljuｲki obravnave pa naj bi bili vkljuｲeni v novo pobudo, ki naj bi jo zaｲela Komisija z namenom, da spodbudi dejavnosti NVO.
The participants were clear about what they felt was needed:
Sodelujoｲi so se strinjali, da je treba:
‡ keeping the issues of abuse and sexual exploitation of children high on the political agenda through organised lobbying and awareness-raising;
‡ postaviti problematiko izkoriþｲanja in spolnega zlorabljanja otrok v ospredje politiｲnih agend s pomoｲjo organiziranega lobiranja in ozaveþｲanja;
‡ improved coherent legislative frameworks at national level and legal reforms to move to-wards harmonisation at European level;
‡ izboljþati usklajenost zakonodajnih okvirov na dr™avni ravni in preko zakonskih reform po-stopno preiti k usklajevanju na evropski ravni;
‡ cooperation and coordination among NGOs and improved multidisciplinary cooperation, leading to enhanced information exchange and sharing of good practices;
‡ zagotoviti sodelovanje in usklajenost med NVO ter izboljþano multidisciplinarno sodelo-vanje, kar naj bi vodilo k veｲji izmenjavi informacij in dobre prakse;
‡ mapping of problems and resources to avoid duplication and produce added value;
‡ natanｲno opredeliti probleme in sredstva za prepreｲevanje podvajanja in za ustvarjanje dodane vrednosti;
‡ the involvement of children in all prevention and rehabilitation programmes, acknowledg-ing that they are not passive victims but important resources with needs that they should de«nethemselves (6).
‡ vkljuｲiti otroke v vse preventivne in rehabilitacijske programe, zavedajoｲ se, da otroci niso pasivne ™rtve, temveｲ dragocen vir s potrebami, ki bi jih morali sami doloｲiti.6
These concerns were integrated into the design of the Daphne initiative (7), announced just after the hearing and which was launched in May 1997.
Enoletna pobuda Daphne iz leta 1997 je naletela na odprta uþesa pri NVO.
The one-year Daphne initiative of 1997 struck a chord with NGOs, and response to the two calls for proposals (the « r s t i n M a y a n d t h e s e cffo n d i n S e p t e m b e r ) w a s h i g h .
Odziv na dva raz-pisa za predloge (prvi je bil maja, drugi pa septembra) je bil velik.
A s a r e s u l t , f u n d - i n g for the initiative was renewed in 1998 and increased to ECU 5 million.
Zato je bilo «nanciranjeodobreno tudi za leto 1998 in poviþano na 5 milijonov ekujev.