natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As for the substance of the case, the Ombudsman considered that the ECDC provided a reasonable explanation, which was both sufficient and coherent, for its decision to reject the complainant's application. →→→ One complainant turned to the Ombudsman regarding a selection procedure that was organised by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
Glede vsebine primera pa je varuh človekovih pravic menil, da je EcDc za zavrnitev pritožnikove prošnje navedel razumno razlago, ki je bila zadostna in skladna. →→→ Pritožnik se je obrnil na varuha človekovih pravic v zvezi z izbirnim postopkom, ki ga je opravila Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu (Easa).
EASA reacted very positively to the Ombudsman's inquiry.
Easa se je na preiskavo varuha človekovih pravic odzvala zelo pozitivno.
In case 893/2006/BU, which constitutes a further star case for the year 2008, the agency not only acknowledged the mistake and apologised for it, but also agreed, during the inquiry, to give the complainant the information he required and committed itself to doing so in future procedures. ←←←Two parallel cases, one against Parliament (186/2005/ELB) and another against the Commission (185/2005/ELB), led to different outcomes.
V primeru 893/2006/BU, ki je še eden od nadvse uspešnih primerov v letu 2008, agencija ni samo priznala napake in se zanjo opravičila, temveč je med preiskavo tudi soglašala, da pritožniku zagotovi podatke, ki jih je zahteval, in se je zavezala, da bo tako naredila tudi v prihodnjih postopkih. ←←←Dva vzporedna primera, eden zoper Parlament (186/2005/ELB) in eden zoper Komisijo (185/2005/ELB), sta privedla do različnih izidov.
Whereas Parliament accepted the Ombudsman's draft recommendation, the Commission refused to do so.
Medtem, ko je Parlament sprejel osnutek priporočila varuha človekovih pravic, Komisija tega ni želela storiti.
These cases relate to discrimination on the grounds of age, and more specifically, the decision to stop hiring Auxiliary Conference Interpreters (ACIs), that is, freelance interpreters hired for specific conferences and meetings, who are older than 65 years of age.
Ta primera se nanašata na starostno diskriminacijo, natančneje na odločitev, da se preneha zaposlovati pomožne konferenčne tolmače na zasedanjih (AcI), tj. samostojne tolmače, ki se jih najame za določene konference in srečanja, ki so starejši od 65 let.
The complainant had worked for these institutions for more than 35 years as an ACI, but stopped receiving job offers once he turned 65.
Pritožnik je kot pomožni konferenčni tolmač delal za te institucije več kot 35 let, vendar je prenehal prejemati ponudbe za delo, ko je dopolnil 65 let.
The Ombudsman took the view that the Commission had not adequately justified why it treated ACIs over 65 differently.
Varuh človekovih pravic je zavzel stališče, da Komisija ni zadostno utemeljila, zakaj je drugače obravnavala pomožne konferenčne tolmače, starejše od 65 let.
Since the case raised an important issue of principle, the Ombudsman submitted a special report to Parliament.
Ker je primer izpostavil pomembno vprašanje načela, je varuh človekovih pravic Parlamentu predložil posebno poročilo.
This was the only special report issued by the Ombudsman in 2008.
To je bilo edino posebno poročilo, ki ga je varuh človekovih pravic izdal v letu 2008.
Institutional, policy matters and other
■■Institucionalne in politične zadeve ter drugo
This residual heading covers a range of complaints made against the institutions regarding their policy making activities or their general functioning.
Ta zadnja kategorija zajema različne pritožbe proti institucijam v zvezi z njihovimi dejavnostmi oblikovanja politike ali splošnim delovanjem.
In case 284/2006/PB, a Danish complainant complained about the implementation of Community legislation on the introduction of digital tachographs in vehicles.
V primeru 284/2006/PB se je danski pritožnik pritožil zaradi izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti o uvedbi digitalnih tahografov v vozilih.
Specifically, he alleged that the Commission had no legal authority to establish a moratorium on the compulsory installation of the said tachographs in all vehicles.
Trdil je, da Komisija ni imela zakonskega pooblastila, da uvede moratorij na obvezno namestitev omenjenih tahografov v vsa vozila. Varuh človekovih pravic je ugotovil, da je trditev upravičena, in je dal kritično pripombo.
Case 2487/2006/DK concerned a complainant who considered that he had been wrongly refused access to Commission buildings.
Primer 2487/2006/DK je obravnaval pritožnika, ki je menil, da mu je bil neupravičeno prepovedan vstop v prostore Komisije.
The Ombudsman found that the complainant's access had not been refused, but had rather been made subject to certain conditions.
Varuh človekovih pravic je ugotovil, da pritožniku vstop ni bil prepovedan, ampak mu je bil dovoljen pod določenimi pogoji.
He concluded that the Commission's decision reflected a reasonable exercise of its authority to regulate access to Community premises.
Sklenil je, da odločitev Komisije kaže razumno izvajanje nadzora nad vstopom v prostore Komisije.
In case 2819/2005/BU, the Ombudsman criticised the European Parliament for the rough treatment given by its security services to the complainant, a former assistant of an MeP, after the latter decided to terminate her contract. The Ombudsman concluded that the treatment violated the principle of proportionality and made a draft recommendation.
V primeru 2819/2005/BU je varuh človekovih pravic kritiziral Evropski parlament zaradi grobega ravnanja njegove varnostne službe s pritožnico, nekdanjo asistentko poslanca Evropskega parlamenta, potem ko se je ta odločil, da prekine njeno pogodbo. Varuh človekovih pravic je sklenil, da je ravnanje kršilo načelo sorazmer-
The European Ombudsman — Annual Report 2008
Pritožbe in preiskave nosti, in je dal osnutek priporočila.
Although the European Schools are not a Community body, the Ombudsman has conducted some inquiries which relate to the general framework under which the European Schools operate.
Varuh človekovih pravic je sklenil, da Komisija ni presegla svojih pooblastil na tem področju niti ni delovala na očitno nerazumen način.Čeprav Evropske šole niso organ Skupnosti, je varuh človekovih pravic izvedel nekatere preiskave, ki so povezane s splošnim okvirom, v katerem Evropske šole delujejo.
Such inquiries are directed against the Commission which has a representative in the Schools' Management Board and which is also responsible for a very substantial part of the Schools' operating budget.
Take preiskave so usmerjene zoper Komisijo, ki ima predstavnika v upravnem odboru te šole in ki je tudi odgovorna za zelo velik del njenega operativnega proračuna.
In 2008, the Ombudsman closed a number of inquiries into the role played by the Commission in the functioning of the European Schools.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v letu 2008 zaključil več preiskav o vlogi, ki jo ima Komisija pri delovanju Evropskih šol.
Case 262/2006/OV concerned alleged discrimination arising from the rule setting out a maximum nine-year period for the secondment of teachers to the Schools.
V primeru 262/2006/OV je bila obravnavana domnevna diskriminacija, izhajajoča iz pravila, ki določa največ devetletno obdobje za dodelitev učiteljev tem šolam.
Case 2153/2004/MF concerned two decisions of the Schools' Board of Governors to increase school fees.
V primeru 2153/2004/MF sta bili obravnavani dve odločitvi svetov guvernerjev Šol o povišanju šolnin.
The complainant alleged a denial of justice because the Parents' Associations were denied the right to appeal to the Complaints Board against those decisions.
Pritožnik je trdil, da je to odrekanje pravic, ker združenje staršev ni imelo pravice do pritožbe odboru za pritožbe zoper ti odločitvi.
In response to calls from the Ombudsman, the Commission stated that it intended to ask the Secretary-General, in one of the next meetings of the Board of Governors, to introduce an amendment to the General Rules of the European Schools to allow appeals against such decisions.
Komisija je v odgovor na pozive varuha človekovih pravic navedla, da namerava na enem od naslednjih sestankov sveta guvernerjev generalnega sekretarja zaprositi za uvedbo spremembe splošnih pravil Evropskih šol, tako da bodo omogočene pritožbe zoper take odločitve.
The Ombudsman criticised the Commission in case 101/2004/GG which concerned a request by a former scientific assistant of the Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU) in Karlsruhe for the Commission to investigate several breaches of security rules at the ITU, which is part of the Commission.
Varuh človekovih pravic je kritiziral Komisijo v primeru 101/2004/GG, v katerem je bila obravnavana zahteva nekdanjega znanstvenega pomočnika na Inštitutu za transurane elemente (ItU) v mestu Karlsruhe v Nemčiji Komisiji, naj preuči več kršitev varnostnih predpisov na ItU, ki je del Komisije.
One particularly serious incident concerned an allegedly deliberate illegal export of radioactive material to a laboratory in the United States in 1997.
Eden od posebno resnih incidentov je bil povezan z domnevno namernim nezakonitim izvozom radioaktivnega materiala v laboratorij v Združenih državah v letu 1997.
The German authorities examined the complainant's allegations, and the Commission took action to remedy certain shortcomings and to prevent similar problems from arising in the future.
Nemški organi so preučili trditve pritožnika, Komisija pa je sprejela ukrepe za odpravo nekaterih pomanjkljivosti in preprečitev podobnih težav v prihodnosti.
However, the Ombudsman concluded that the Commission had not shown that it had properly examined all of the complainant's allegations, in particular the aforementioned incident.
Varuh človekovih pravic je kljub temu sklenil, da Komisija ni dokazala, da je ustrezno preučila vse trditve pritožnika, še posebno prej omenjeni incident.
While he accepted that, since the recipient institution in the United States had refrained from providing information on this issue, it was not possible to establish whether radioactive material had indeed been shipped to the United States illegally, he criticised the fact that the Commission failed properly to consider and examine all the remaining elements that were relevant in this context.
Čeprav je varuh človekovih pravic sprejel dejstvo, da ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali je bil radioaktivni material v Združene države res poslan nezakonito, ker institucija, ki naj bi material prejela, ni želela dajati podatkov v zvezi s tem vprašanjem, je kritiziral dejstvo, da Komisija ni ustrezno preverila in preučila vseh preostalih elementov, ki so bili pomembni v tem smislu.
If a complaint is outside the European Ombudsman's mandate, he tries to advise the complainant of another body that could be competent to deal with the complaint, especially if the case involves
Če je pritožba izven pristojnosti Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, poskuša pritožniku priporočiti drug organ, ki bi lahko bil pristojen za njeno obravnavo. Če je to mogoče in če se zdijo razlogi
If a complaint is outside the European Ombudsman's mandate, he tries to advise the complainant of another body that could be competent to deal with the complaint.
Če je pritožba izven pristojnosti Evropskegavaruha človekovih pravic, poskuša pritožniku priporočiti drug organ, ki bi lahko bil pristojen za njeno obravnavo.
EU law. If possible, and provided there appear to be grounds for the complaint, the Ombudsman, with the prior consent of the complainant, transfers it directly to another competent body.Complaints that are outside the Ombudsman's mandate often concern alleged infringements of Community law by Member
za pritožbo utemeljeni, varuh človekovih pravic s predhodnim soglasjem pritožnika pritožbo neposredno preda drugemu pristojnemu organu.Pritožbe, ki so zunaj pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic, se večkrat nanašajo na domnevne kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki naj bi jih zagrešile države članice.
States. Many such cases can best be handled by another member of the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Številne take primere najlažje obravnava kak drug član Evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic.
The European Ombudsman co-operates closely with his national and regional coun-
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic prek Evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic tesno sodeluje
The European Ombudsman co-operates closely with his national and regional counterparts in the Member States through the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic prek Evropskemreže varuhov človekovih pravic tesno sodeluje z nacionalnimi in regionalnimi kolegi v državah članicah.
terparts in the Member States through the European Network of Ombudsmen (see section 4.2 below).
z nacionalnimi in regionalnimi kolegi v državah članicah (glej razdelek 4.2).
One of the purposes of the Network is to facilitate the rapid transfer of complaints to the competent national or regional ombudsman or similar body. The
Eden od namenov te mreže je omogočiti hitro posredovanje pritožb pristojnemu nacionalnemu ali regionalnemu varuhu človekovih pravic ali podobnemu organu.
Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament also participates in the Network as a full member.In some cases, the Ombudsman considers it appropriate to transfer the complaint to the Commission or to SOLVIT, a network set up by the Commission to help people who face obstacles when trying to exercise their rights in the Union's internal market.
V mreži kot polnopravni član sodeluje tudi Odbor za peticije Evropskega parlamenta.Varuh človekovih pravic v nekaterih primerih meni, da je pritožbo primerno posredovati Komisiji ali mreži SolvIt, mreži, ki jo je Komisija vzpostavila za pomoč ljudem, ki se srečujejo s težavami pri uveljavljanju svojih pravic na notranjem trgu Unije.
In 70% of all cases examined in 2008, advice was given or the case was transferred.
Službe varuha človekovih pravic pred posre-
Network of Ombudsmen or the complainant was advised to contact a member of the Network (888 were referred to a national or regional ombudsman, while 191 were referred to the European Parliament's Committee on Petitions).
Kot je razvidno s slike 3.12, je bila pritožba v 1 079 primerih posredovana članu Evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic ali pa je varuh pritožniku svetoval, naj se obrne na člana mreže (888 pritožb je bilo posredovanih nacionalnemu ali regionalnemu varuhu človekovih pravic, 191 pa jih je bilo posredovanih Odboru za peticije Evropskega parlamenta).
An additional 325 complainants were referred to the European Commission55, while 708 cases were referred to other institutions and bodies, such as SOLVIT or specialised ombudsmen or complaint-handling bodies in the Member States.
Dodatnih 325 pritožb je bilo posredovanih Evropski komisiji55, 708 primerov pa drugim institucijam ali organom, kot so mreža SolvIt, ali specializirani varuhi človekovih pravic, ali organi za obravnavanje pritožb v državah članicah.
The rest of this Chapter contains examples of cases transferred or where advice was given.
Preostanek tega poglavja vsebuje primere posredovanih primerov ali primere, v katerih je bil dan nasvet.
Figure3.12:Complaintstransferredtootherinstitutionsandbodies Complainantsadvisedtocontactotherinstitutionsandbodies
Slika3.12:Pritožbe,posredovanedrugiminstitucijaminorganom Pritožnikomsvetovano,najseobrnejonadrugeinstitucijeinorgane lan Evropske mre�e varuhov človekovih pravic
A national or regional ombudsman or similar body
Nacionalni ali r egionalni v aruh človerkovih pravic ali podoben organ
The European Parliament Committee on Petitions
Evropski parlament Odbor za peticije ruge institucije in organi
This includes 158 complaints registered towards the end of 2007, which were processed in 2008 and excludes 220 complaints registered towards the end of 2008, which were still being processed at the end of the year to determine what action to take.In some cases, more than one type of advice was given to a complainant.
V nekaterih primerih je bila pritožniku dana več kot ena vrsta nasveta.
These percentages therefore total more than 100%.
Zato je seštevek vseh odstotkov višji od 100 %.
Complaints involving the European Network of Ombudsmen
Pritožbe, ki so vključevale Evropsko mrežo varuhov človekovih pravic
A French citizen lodged a complaint against a French Regional Health Insurance Office relating to difficulties he had experienced with regard to his claims for pension payments.
Francoski državljan je vložil pritožbo zoper francoski regionalni urad za zdravstveno zavarovanje zaradi težav, ki jih je imel z zahtevki za izplačilo pokojnine.
The European Ombudsman contacted his French counterpart to ensure that he could deal with the matter.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic se je obrnil na svojega francoskega kolega, da se prepriča, ali bo lahko zadevo obravnaval.
He then contacted the complainant, who agreed for his complaint to be transferred to the French Ombudsman.
Potem je vzpostavil stik s pritožnikom, in ta se je strinjal, da se njegova pritožba posreduje francoskemu varuhu človekovih pravic.
The latter investigated the complaint and confirmed that the complainant's pension payments would be paid to him with retrospective effect.1617/2008/CHM 
Francoski varuh je izvedel preiskavo v zvezi s pritožbo in potrdil, da bodo pokojnine pritožniku izplačane z učinkom za nazaj.1617/2008/CHM 
The European Ombudsman received complaints from Bulgarian citizens about energy companies (suppliers of central heating and warm water) in Bulgaria.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic je prejel pritožbe bolgarskih državljanov zoper energetska podjetja (dobavitelje centralnega ogrevanja in tople vode) iz Bolgarije.
Since the complainants alleged that Community law on energy end-use efficiency and energy services had not been properly transposed, the Ombudsman advised them to consider filing an infringement complaint with the Commission and informed the Commission about the matter.The Bulgarian Ombudsman had received hundreds of similar complaints, covering issues from violations of consumer rights to the methodology used for the calculation of individual bills.
Ker so pritožniki trdili, da pravo Skupnosti o učinkovitosti rabe končne energije in o energetskih storitvah ni bilo pravilno preneseno, jim je varuh človekovih pravic svetoval, naj razmislijo o vložitvi pritožbe zoper kršitev pri Komisiji in je Komisijo obvestil o zadevi.Bolgarski varuh človekovih pravic je prejel na stotine podobnih pritožb, ki so vsebovale vprašanja od kršitve pravic potrošnika do metodologije, ki se uporablja za izračun zneska posameznih računov.
He subsequently informed the European Ombudsman about developments in this area, most notably concerning changes to the Bulgarian law on energy efficiency.2349/2008/VIK and similar cases 
Ker zadevna energetska podjetja spadajo v pristojnost bolgarskega varuha človekovih pravic, je ta izvedel preiskavo v zvezi s pritožbami in izdal poročilo
55.This figure includes some cases in which a complaint against the Commission was declared inadmissible because appropriate administrative approaches to the institution had not been made before the complaint was lodged with the Ombudsman.
55.V to število so vključeni nekateri primeri, v katerih je bila pritožba proti Komisiji razglašena za nedopustno, ker pred predložitvijo pritožbe varuhu človekovih pravic niso bila izčrpana ustrezna upravna sredstva pri tej instituciji.
The European Ombudsman — Annual Report 2008
Naknadno je Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic obvestil o razvoju na tem področju, predvsem v zvezi s spremembami bolgarskega zakona o energetski učinkovitosti.2349/2008/VIK in podobni primeri 
A Spanish national complained to the European Ombudsman, on behalf of a political party, about an alleged violation of fundamental rights by both Spanish national and regional authorities.
Španski državljan se je v imenu politične stranke pritožil Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic zaradi domnevne kršitve temeljnih pravic, ki naj bi jo zagrešili španski nacionalni in regionalni organi.
He argued that the Spanish authorities had failed to take all necessary measures to ensure that citizens who live in certain Spanish regions which have their own regional languages are able to exercise their rights, in particular as regards the use of Spanish in schools and universities, and to ensure that citizens do not feel threatened by the terrorist organisation ETA.
Trdil je, da španske oblasti niso sprejele vseh potrebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev, da bi lahko državljani, ki živijo v nekaterih španskih regijah z lastnimi regionalnimi jeziki, uveljavljali svoje pravice, predvsem v zvezi z uporabo španskega jezika v šolah in na univerzah ter da bi zagotovile, da se državljani ne počutijo ogrožene zaradi teroristične organizacije Eta.
The Ombudsman transferred the case to the Spanish Ombudsman who could launch the necessary initiatives regarding these allegations.The complainant also argued that the European Commission had failed to take action against the Spanish authorities to ensure compliance with these rights and freedoms.
Varuh človekovih pravic je primer posredoval španskemu varuhu, in ta je lahko sprožil ustrezne pobude v zvezi s temi trditvami.Pritožnik je trdil tudi, da Evropska komisija ni ukrepala proti španskim organom, da bi zagotovila spoštovanje teh pravic in svoboščin.
Since he had not yet contacted the institution to inform it about his concerns, the European Ombudsman advised the complainant to lodge a complaint with the Commission. 3009/2007/SMG 
Ker se pritožnik še ni obrnil na Komisijo, da bi jo obvestil o svoji zaskrbljenosti, mu je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic svetoval, naj vloži pritožbo pri Komisiji. 3009/2007/SMG 
A complainant, who lives in Hungary, lodged a complaint with the European Ombudsman.
Pritožnik, ki živi na Madžarskem, je vložil pritožbo pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic.
The complainant pays alimony to his ex-wife who lives in France.
Pritožnik nekdanji ženi, ki živi v Franciji, plačuje preživnino.
He complained about the fact that, in Hungary, the alimony is not deductible from his taxable income.
Pritožil se je zaradi dejstva, da se na Madžarskem preživnina ne more odbiti od njegovega obdavčljivega dohodka.
According to the complainant, if he lived in France, the alimony would be deductible.
Po pritožnikovih besedah bi se preživnina od njega lahko odbila, če bi živel v Franciji.
He considered that the EU should act concerning this matter.The Ombudsman transferred this complaint to the European Parliament to be dealt with as a petition.
Menil je, da mora EU ukrepati v zvezi s tem.Varuh človekovih pravic je to pritožbo posredoval Evropskemu parlamentu, da bi jo obravnaval kot peticijo.
The Committee on Petitions began to examine the petition, asking the European Commission to carry out a preliminary study into the different aspects of the problem.2592/2007/LR 
Odbor za peticije je začel preučevati peticijo in je Evropsko komisijo pozval, naj izvede predhodno študijo o različnih vidikih težave.2592/2007/LR 
Complaints transferred to the European Commission
Pritožbe, posredovane Evropski komisiji
The European Ombudsman received a complaint from the Regional Ombudsman of Andalusia, Spain, concerning an oil spill caused by the collision of two ships near the coast of Cadiz and the Gibraltar area.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic je prejel pritožbo regionalnega varuha človekovih pravic Andaluzije iz Španije v zvezi z izlitjem nafte, ki je bilo posledica trka dveh ladij v bližini obale okrog mesta Cadiz in območja Gibraltarja.
According to the complainant, the oil spill was seriously affecting the nearby area and the responsible authorities had failed to take appropriate action.
Po trditvah pritožnika je izlitje nafte resno prizadelo bližnje območje, odgovorni organi pa niso ustrezno ukrepali.
Specifically, he considered that the situation violated Community law on environmental liability.Since the case involved a potential infringement of Community law by a Member State, the Ombudsman transferred the case to the Commission.
Menil je zlasti, da je položaj pomenil kršitev prava Skupnosti o okoljski odgovornosti.Ker je primer vključeval morebitno kršitev prava Skupnosti s strani države članice, je varuh človekovih pravic primer posredoval Komisiji.