natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some participants said that thefour pillars of the European Strategy for Employment and the European Social Fund shouldbe better coordinated, and the mobilising of all whoare in favour of social inclusion through partnershipshould be encouraged by the Structural Funds.
Potrdili so potrebo po nadaljevanju in razširitvi ukrepov Skupnosti, ki so v prid mestom – gonilni sili regionalnega razvoo socialne kohezije znotraj mest in izboljšanje urbanega okolja.
Onthe question of equal opportunities, the integrationof gender issues across the board should be givenpriority.
Udeleženci so Komisijo pozvali, naj pržno-sti dodelitvenih skladov za nastanitev, da naj ustvari partnerje v mestih glede vprašanj, ki se jih neposredno dotikajo, ter zagotovi boljšo koordinacijo z drugimi programi in spodbujanje izmenjave izkušenj ter mreženje.
The outermost regions
• Pomoč izven regij, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, pre podpore.
•Europe’s outermost regions (Canary Islands, Azores,Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Réunion, Martinique,Madeira) have a population of 3.8 million andqualify under Objective 1 and for the exceptions onpublic aid provided for in the Treaty.
Nazadnje se je 500 udeležencev iz drža, držav kandidatk in držav, ki, srvi o Skupnosti in politiki do gora ob priložnosti mednarodnega leta gora. Na seminarju, ki se je izkazal kot prava priložnost za resen dialog, so poudarili potrebo ojektih, boljši koordinaciji med politiko
•Their GDP is 66% of the EU average.
Skupnosti in dodano vrna tem podr.
The listing of areas eligible for these aids is nolonger considered appropriate.
• Izmenjava izkušenj in sodelovanje imata pozitiven učinek, ki ga vsi pozdravljajo, še posebej pa se kaže pri .
•Exchanges of experience and cooperationhave a positive impactwhich is widely recognised, especially at cross-border level.
Veliko tem je bilo v srzijske politike v letu 2002.
•The greater contribution of Community poli-cies(fisheries, competition, agriculture, transport,environment, research and development) to economic and social cohesionwas widely commented on in 2002.
• Večji prispevek politik Skupnosti (ribiške, konku-r, kmetijske, transportne, okoljske, razvojne) k ekonomski in socialni koheziji je bila zelo pogosta tema komentarjev v letu 2002.
•The likely repercussions on regional State aid ofabolishing the Objective 2designation was discussed on many occasions.
• Prednostna obravnava najmanj razvitih regij je bila deležna soglasne podpore in kriterij 75 % povpr
7.The nomenclature of statistical territorial units (NUTS) was set up by Eurostat as a single, coherent system for dividing up the European Union territory.
7 lasifikacijo teritoropskih skupnosti (Eurostat) oblikoval kot enoten, koherenten sistem za razdelitopske unije.
Thepresent nomenclature subdivides the EU countries into 78 NUTS level 1 territories (Länder in Germany, régions/regionenin Belgium, etc.), 210 NUTS level 2territories (Comunidades autonomasin Spain, régionsand départements outre merin France, regioniin Italy, Länderin Austria, etc.) and 1 093 smaller NUTSlevel 3 territories.
Sedanja klasifikacija deli državevni NUTS 1 (Länderrégions/regionen v Belgiji itd.), 210 enot na ravni NUTS 2 (Comunidades autonomas v Španiji, régions in départements outre mer v Franciji, regioni v Italiji, Länder v Avstriji itd.) in 1093 manjših enot na ravni NUTS 3.
III.Preparing for enlargement and theperiod 2004-06
Posebno poročilou obvez o regionalni politiki, ki so jih države kandidatke sprejele med pogajanji, bo predstavljeno v juliju 2003.
Following the completion of the accession negotiations at the Copenhagen European Council, the mainpart of the preparations for enlargement consist infinalising the future Member States’ structuralprogrammes and seeing to it that they are actually being implemented on the date of accession.
Po zaku pristopnih pogajanj na vrhu EU v Københavnu je kiprav za širitev sestavljen iz dokončnega izoblikovanja strukturnih programov bodočih držav članic in iz potrebe, da se poskrbi za resnično izvajanje naštetih programov od datuma pristopa dalje.
administrative structures and monitoring and inspection procedures.
Nekateri problemi, ki jih je še treba rešiti, so bili izpostavljeni v rednih poredku držav kandidatk pri sprejemanju pravnega reda EU (acquis communautaire).
In addition, the Commission willpresent a new overall evaluation of their state ofpreparedness six months before the date of accession.
Težave so v glavnem v neustrezni koordinaciji ministrstev, slabih administrativnih postopkih in neenotnosti inšpekcijskih storitev.
In view of the limited experience of the candidatecountries in using Community funds and in order toensure that the funds are properly managed, the Commission and the Member States have demandedfirmcommitments from those countries regarding
Z vidika skromnih izkušenj držav kandidatk s skladi Skupnosti in za zagotovitev primernega upravljanja skladov so Komisija in državeod teh držav zahtevale
The Copenhagen Council adopted an allocation of EUR 21.7 billion for the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund for 2004-06, i.e. average per capita aidin 2006 of EUR117.
Na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Københavnu so predsedniki držade evrov namenili strukturnim skladom in kohezijskemu skladu za obdobje od leta 2004 do leta 2006, to znese v povpre-oebivalca v letu 2006.
This is below what had been originally envisaged in the Berlin financial framework(EUR191 per head in 2006).
Vsota je nižja, kot je bila predvidena v berlinskvi-ru (191 evroebivalca v letu 2006). Tretjino naj bi porabil kohezijski sklad, ki gre strukturnim skladom, pa je prvenstveno namenjena za Cilj 1.
The Community Initiatives will be restricted to Interreg and Equal.
Pobude Skupnosti so se omejile na Interreg in Equal.
I. Introduction impact on future cohesion policy need to be considered, including:
To drugo poro napredku predstavlja dopolnjeno analizo stanja in trendov v regijah ter glavne teme debate o prihodnosti kohezijske politike, ki je potekala v letu 2002.
•An unprecedented widening of economic disparities within the Union:the gap in per capita GDP between the 10% of the population living inthe most prosperous regions and the same percentage living in the least prosperous ones willmore than double compared with the situation in EU15.
• Geografski premik v razporeditvi razlik: v EU s 25 i predstavljajo okoli 25 % vsega prebivalstva, živelo v regijah z BDP-jem na prebivalca pod 75 % povprimerjavi z 68 milijoni ljudi, oziroma 18 % vseh prebivalcev, v EU s d teh bodo štirje državljani od desetih živeli v regijah, ki pripadajo sedanjim držaostalih šest pa bo državljanov držav kandidatk.
The debate launched by the Commission followingthe adoption of the Second Report on Economic and Social Cohesion, on the options for future cohesionpolicy, has continued to engage the principal partiesinvolved in the regions, in the present and future Member States and in the EU Institutions.
Širitev Evropske unije na 25 držaonku-rohezijo Unije, kot ga še ni bilo.
This secondprogress report presents an update of the analysis ofthe situation and trends emerging in the regions,along with the main topics of the debate during 2002on the future of cohesion policy.
Pri tem je treba upoštvnike, ki bodo nedvomno vplivali na prihodnjo kohezijsko politiko, in sicer:
II.Analysis of the situation and trends:the challenge of enlargement
V razširjeni Evropski uniji bodo razlike glede na starost, spol, raven kvalificiranosti in znanje ostale.
The enlargement of Europe to include 25 Member States will present an unprecedented challenge forthe competitiveness and internal cohesion of the Union. Several factors that will have an undoubted
• Povečanje gospodarskih razlik znotraj Unije: razkorak v stopnjah BDP-ja na prebivalca med 10 % prebivalcev, ki živijo v najrazvitejših regijah, in enakim odstot-
Of these, four out of ten citizenswill be living in regions belonging to the existing Member States while the other six will be nationalsof the candidate countries.
Po drugi strani pa drugi dejavniki kažejo na gospodarski potencial razširjene Evropske unije: v splošnem so imele
•A less advantageous employment situation:three million jobs will have to be created if theaverage level of employment in the new Member States is to be aligned with that of the rest of the EU on account of the trend of decline in the rate ofemployment and a higher long-term youth unemployment rate.
Ko je tekla razprava o tem, kako opredeliti manj razvite regije, prispevki niso postavljali pod vprašaj uporabe sedanjih meril o izpolnjevanju pogojev, ki temeljijo na statistični kvalifikaciji teritorialnih enot na ravni NUTS II in višini BDP-ja na prebivalca, in se odlikujejo s tem, da so enostavna in transparentna.
Within the enlarged EU, appreciable employment gaps will persist according to age,gender and the level of qualifications and skills.
Kljub temu pa nekateri prispevki izražajo zahtevo po dodatnih kriterijih.
Action in the less developed regions
Potekala je obširna razprava o prostoru, potrebnem za ategorije regij v okviru prihodnje kohezijske politike.
This progress report confirms both the unprecedented increase in the disparities within the enlarged Union and the long-term nature of the efforts thatwill be needed to reduce them.
Rispevki tega poražejo, da je bila debata o prihodnosti kohezijske politike intenzivna v celotnem obdobju od izdaje prvega poredku pred letom dni. Ti prispevki so skupaj z rliz in študij Kditev štirih klpoudarkov te politike:
There is a broad consensus around the need to continue to concentrateresources on the less developed regions, and especially on those in the new Member States.
• vlogo prerazporeditve v prid revnejšim držanicam in regijam (s pomembnim makroekonomskim vplivom, ki spodbuja pravo konvergenco);
III.The main topics of the debate onfuture cohesion policy
• krepitev ekonomskegracije (razvoj infrastrukturne mreže, izboljšan dostop za oddaljene regije, projekti sodelovanja);
On how to define the less developed regions, thecontributions to the debate have not seriously putinto question continued use of the present eligibility criteria based on the NUTS II geographicallevel and per capita GDP– which has the merit ofbeing simple and transparent - even if some contributions have called for other criteria to be added.
• prispevek k izvajanju prioritet Skupnosti, ki jih postavlja lizbonska strategija, kar je bilo podrobneje pojasnjeno na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Göteborgu, vkz gospodarskim in socialnim prestrukturiranjem, ki je posledica globalizacije;
There has been a wide-ranging discussion on theplace to be reserved for certain specific categories ofregion under future policy.
• prispevek k boljšemu upravljanju (partnerstvo, kultura vrednotenja itd.).
The different contributions examined in this reportreveal that the debate on the future of cohesion policy has remained intense throughout the period sincethe publication of the first progress report a year ago.These contributions, together with the results of thevarious analyses and studies by the Commission, havemade it possible to confirm four major contribu-tionsof this policy:
In k, pojaeditve, ki bi ustrategorijam regij. To še posebej zadeva najbolj oddaljene regije, katerih socialne in gospodarske težaveogodbe o EU.
•a redistribution function in favour of the less welloff Member States and regions (with a significantmacroeconomic impact, promoting genuine convergence);
Dovanje seznama kvprašanj, na katera bo moralo odgovoriti tretje porekonomski in socialni koheziji. Ta vprašanja lahko razdelimo v dve skupini: prednostne naloge prihodnje kohezijske politike in metode njenega izvajanja.
•a contribution to achieving the Community priorities set by the Lisbon strategy, as amplified by theopean Council, including the economic and social restructuring resulting from globalisation;
Ostale regije, ki v tem kontekstu niso bile omenjene, so najmanj razviti otokregije z zelo majhno gostoto prebivalstva, še posebej tisti deli skandinavskih držav, ki so sedaj izviru Cilja 1 v skladu s 6. protokolom Akta o pristopu Avstrije, Finske in Švedske.
Secondly, there was the question of the regions thatwould no longer have met the eligibility criteria to beconsidered less developed even in the absence ofenlargement, because they have achieved an incomeper head above 75% of the average for the EUR15.Several contributions have expressed support forassistance in the form of a gradual phasing out of Community aid for such regions.
Tretje poroheziji bo moralo izpostaviti nujnost obravnave teh posebnih primerov na podlagi njihovih individualnih potreb, a tudi upoštevati možnosti, ki jih
•a contribution to better governance (partnership,an evaluation culture, etc.).
To poredku potrjuje tako povlik znotraj razširjene Unije kot tudi dejstvo, da bodo za zmanjšanje teh razlik potrebni dolgori.
SECOND PROGRESS REPORT ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COHESION • JANUARY 2003
O O NAPREDKU EKONOMSKE IN SOCIALNE KOHEZIJE • JANUAR 2003 meznih regij in zaostalost najmanj razvitih regij in otokov, vkelskimi podr”.
A sustainable development strategy for the European Union was decided by the European Council in Göteborg.
Dejavnosti izven manj razvitih regij
Other regions that have been mentioned in this context are the least favoured islands mentioned in Article 158 and regions with an extremely lowpopulation density,notably those parts of the Nordic countries currently assimilated to Objective 1pursuant to Protocol 6 of the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden.
Teh glavnih prednostnih nalog Evropske unije so se v i lotili že med sedanjim programskim obdobjem v okviru Cilja 2 (regije v fazi prestrukturiranja), Cilja 3 eški viri), pobud Skupnosti, inovativne dejavnosti in ukrepov izven Cilja 1 o kmetijski in ribiški politiki.
The third cohesion report will have to address theneeds of these special cases on the basis of their individual merits, but also taking into account the possibilities offered under arrangements for the regionsoutside the less developed areas.
V obdobju od leta 2000 do leta 2006 bo približno ena tretjina sredstev iz strukturnih skladov namenjena regijam, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev v okviru Cilja 1.
Action outside the less developed regions
eprav so problemi ekonomske in socialne kohezije izven manj razvitih regij manj perajo Unijo kot celoto na tem podr
A large number of contributions stress that the Member States and regions do not possess the samestrengths for achieving these goals.
Sedanje politike in instrumenti niso bili imuni na kritike na podlagi argumentov, da je dodana vrednost premajhna in glede na dobljene rezultate veva vvložek administracije, in da na državeenese zadostne odgovornosti, ki je v skdiarnosti.
In addition, a policy intended to meet the various challenges facing the Union, that recognises and involves the regional level,is consistent with the spirit of the Commission White Paper on Governance, and especially with the obligations arising under the Treaty on cohesion, which areto “promote its overall harmonious development”and “reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardnessof the least favoured regions or islands, includingrural areas”.
Mnogi trdijo, da medtem ko regije ostajajo primerna raven za snovanje in upravljanje pomoči iz zgoraj navedenih razlogov, ustvarjanje podr, ki so upraegionalni ravni, lahko umetno omeji podrupnosti in jih je težko uskladiti s pristopom, ki poudarja nove dejavnike konkur
In the period 2000-06, approximately one third of the Structural Funds allocation will go to regions whichare not eligible under Objective 1.
Vprašanja konkurvoja, gospodarskega in socialnega prestrukturiranja se pojavljajo v vseh drža Ti izzivi odsevajo velikmožnih potreb, kienzivnejših in bolj izoblikovanih potreb manj razvitih regij, posebej v novih drža Ta širok spekter izzivov poudarja potre-edotvalitativne in sistemske elemente za povednosti v Skupnosti.
Although, by definition, the problems of economicand social cohesion outside regions lagging behindare of a lesser scale, there are several important challenges facing the Union as a whole.
Ostali prispevki so poudarjali teritorialno dimenzijo in naurbana področja, problematična industrijska in podeželska področja, področja, odvisna od ribolova, in področja z naravnimi ovirami.
These major European priorities have, to a certainextent, been tackled already during the present programming period under Objective2 (regions undergoing restructuring), Objective 3 (human resources),Community Initiatives and Innovative Actions andactions outside Objective 1 on rural policy and fisheries.
Skratka, politične prednostne naloge in instrumente izven regij, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, bo treba preoblikovati, da bi tako odpravili sedanje slabosti in izoblikovali novo politiko, ki bo prispevala k ekonomski in socialni koheziji.
In particular, the issues of competitiveness, sustainable development, and economic and social restructuring are relevant in all Member States.
Sodelovanje žarazprave, da bi Unija morala ukrepe te narave izven regij v okviru Cilja 1 povsem opustiti in vrniti odgovornost držajih “renacionalizirati”), se niso razvila in pokazalo se je, da bo treba oblikovati načine, s katerimi bi izpolnili ključne prednostne naloge EU.
These challenges reflect a great diversity of potential needs andsituations, in contrast with the more intense butclear-cut needs of regions lagging behind, especiallyin new Member States.
Z ozirom na to si je Unija, zlasti na zasedanjih Evropskega sveta v Lizboni, zadala desetletni strateški cilj, da bi postala najbolj konkuremelje-vo na svetu, ki bi bilo sposobno dosegati trajno gospodarsko rast z vvnimi mesti ter vohezijo.
This wide range of challengesalso highlights the need to concentrate assistance,and to focus on qualitative, systemic elements inorder to increase Community added value.
Ta strategtako ponovno doseganje pogojev za polno zaposlenost, rast in socialno kohezijo kot tudi okrepitev regionalne kohezije. Strategija trajnega razvoja Evropske unije je bila sprejeta na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Göteborgu.
Initial positions in certain Member States within thedebate that actions of this nature outside the Objective 1 regions should be abandoned entirely bythe Union and responsibilities returned to the Member States (“renationalised”) do not appear tohave gained ground, and the need to have themeans to achieve major European priorities hasbeen recognised.
Sedanje obdobje nazorno prikazuje težave, kio povezane z oblikovanjem koherentnih programov, ki vkdržavnih upravnih in zakonodajnih tradicij.
In this respect, the Union, particularly at the European Councils in Lisbon, has set itselfa strategic goal for the decade: to become the most
Komisiji so dali nalogo, da pržnosti za oblikovanje pravnega instrumenta za čezmejno sodelovanje, kar bi olajšalo pripravo in izvajanje programov EU.
Other contributions have emphasised the territorial dimension, citing variously urban areas, industrial and rural areas in difficulties, areas
Poleg tega je politika, ki se žate-rimi se sri zavestno vkegionalno raven, v skladu z duhom Bele knjige o upravljanju, ki jo je sprejela Unija, in še posebej z obvezami o koheziji, ki nastajajo v okviru Pogodbe o EU in ki naj “spodbujajo uravnotežen razvoj”,“zmanjšujejo razlike v razvitosti posa-
once the broad strategic aspects have been agreedwith the Commission.
(ii) Izvajanje: poenostavitev vodenja
In this context, there is a general agreement that management systems subjectto very detailed rules and based on “one-size-fits-all”are inappropriate, given the vast differences in needs, types of assistance and resourcesmade available, and that the principle of proportionality should apply.
V tretjem poroheziji moramo vložiti vse napore v to, da bi našli tak pogodbeni pristop med Komisijo in nacionalnimi oblastmi (in regionalnimi oblastmi v okviru katerega koli tristranskega sporazuma), ki bo upošteval rezultate, dosežene z uporabo virov Sknim upoštevanjem ustavnega položaja države.
In sum, policy priorities and instruments outsideregions lagging behind would need to be reformulated, in order both to address the presentshortcomings and to construct a new policycapable of making a greater contribution to economic and social cohesion.
Razprave o poenostavitvi vodenja med sedanjim obdobjem in v sedanjem normativnem okviru, ki se uporablja do konca leta 2006, so poudarile glavne težave, ki jih je treba rešiti z upoštevanjem naslednjega programskega obdobja.
Cooperation
Finančni viri
Based on past experience, it is widely recognised thata successful strategic framework for setting the policy priorities depends on the efficiency of the systemsto deliver it.
Delo v tem obdobju se je kstrov 7. oktobra 2002. V, ki so se udeležile zasedanja, je dejala, da se bo v obdobju od leta 2000 do leta 2006 trako spremeniti metode vodenja kohezijske politike v prihodnosti.
With enlargement, changes to the currentdelivery system are needed, taking into considerationthe need to reinforce the administrative capacity ofthe new Member States.
Tako je udeležence spodbudila k razpravi o tem, da razmislijo, kaj naj na tem podržaveupaj s podporo politike Skupnosti posk V veliki meri je do tega tudi prišlov predloge, ki zadevajo renacionalizacijo politike, spodbujajo predvsem prorai pomisleki.
There is also a broad acknowledgement concerningthe need to continue actions to promote cooperationacross frontiers and within regions.
Po tem, ko bo Komisija sprejela širše strateške vidike, bodo državeelele poenostaviti in decentralizirati odgovornosti, ki se nanašajo na vse vidikupravljanja in nadzora evropskih programov.
This is in recognition that the successful implementation of suchactions, which are particularly important for European territorial integration, requires organisationat supranational level.
S tem v zvezi obstaja tudi splošno soglasje, da so sistemi upravljanja, ki so opredeljeni z zelo podrobnimi pravili in temeljijo na načelu “ena velikost za vse”, neprimerni zaradi velikih razlik v potrop-nih virih, in da je treba upoštoporcionalno-sti.
The current period has demonstrated the difficulties inherent in organising coherentprogrammes involving authorities from differentnational administrative and legal traditions.
ih sredstev za ekonomsko in socialno kohezijo bo Unija morala upoštevati ekonomske in socialne razlike v razširjeni Uniji, ki jih poudarja to poredku, in intenzivne ter dolgorne napore, potrebne za njihovo zmanjšanje.
The Commission has been asked to look into the possibility of drawing up a legal instrument for cooperation across frontierswhich could facilitate thedesign and implementation of the European programmes.
Komisija bo še praveljavila svoje prvidikih. Kot je bilo rvem poredku, ima veliko prispevkov v razpravi, še zlasti na regionalni ravni, znesek 0,45 % povprečnega evropskega BDP-ja za minimum, kaov, ki jih je treba nameniti kohezijski politiki za obdobje po letu 2006.
There is also wide recognition that enlargement willaggravate the tension between the need for amore decentralised delivery system, on the onehand, and the need for effective control by the Commission over funding on the other.
Glede na pretekle izkušnje se zaveda, da je uspešni strateški okvir za oblikednostnih nalog ovitosti sistemov, ki ga zagotavljajo. Kot rezultat sedanjih postopkov izvajanja so napori držav omisije v nekaterih primerih imeli vadministrativno vodenje programov in manjši na njihovo vsebino in strateške prioritete.
(ii)Implementation: simplifying management
Prispevek drugih politik
Discussions on how to simplify management duringthe current period and within the current regulatoryframework applicable until the end of 2006 haveunderlined the main difficulties that have to beresolved with a view to the next programming period.
Vsi priznavajo, da bo širitev zaostrila razmerja med potrebo po bolj decentraliziranem delitvenem sistemu na eni strani in potrebo po učinkovitem nadzoru financiranja Komisije na drugi strani.