natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Reasoned orders Where a question referred for a preliminary ruling is identical to a question on which the Court has already been called on to rule, or where the answer to the question admits of no reasonable doubt or may be deduced from existing case-law, the Court of Justice may, after hearing the Advocate General, give its decision by reasoned order, citing in particular a previous judgment relating to that question or the relevant case-law.
Postopek z obrazloženim sklepom Kadar je v predhodno odločanje predloženo vprašanje enako vprašanju, o katerem je Sodišče že razsodilo, ali če odgovor na vprašanje ne dopušča nobenega razumnega dvoma oziroma ga je mogoče izpeljati iz sodne prakse, lahko Sodišče po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca odloči z obrazloženim sklepom, v katerem se sklicuje na že izdano sodbo o tem vprašanju ali na zadevno sodno prakso.
The expedited procedure The expedited procedure enables the Court to give its rulings quickly in very urgent cases by reducing the time-limits and omitting certain steps in the procedure.
Hitri postopek Hitri postopek Sodišču omogoča, da hitro odloči v izjemno nujnih zadevah, tako da se skrajšajo roki in izpustijo nekatere faze postopka.
On application by one of the parties, the President of the Court may decide, after hearing the other parties, whether the particular urgency of the case requires the use of the expedited procedure.
Po vložitvi predloga stranke predsednik Sodišča po opredelitvi drugih strank odloči, ali uporabo hitrega postopka upravičuje posebna nujnost.
Such a procedure can also be used for references for preliminary rulings.
Hitri postopek je predviden tudi pri predlogih za sprejem predhodnih odločb.
In that case, the application is made by the national court seeking the preliminary ruling.
Predlog pri Sodišču vloži v tem primeru nacionalno predložitveno sodišče.
Applications for interim measures Applications for interim measures seek suspension of the operation of measures which an institution has adopted and which form the subject matter of an action, or any other interim order necessary to prevent serious and irreparable damage to a party.
Začasna odredba S predlogom za izdajo začasne odredbe za odlog izvršitve se želi doseči odlog izvršitve akta institucije, ki je tudi predmet tožbe, oziroma vsak drug začasen ukrep, s katerim se odvrne velika in nepopravljiva škoda za stranko.
The costs of proceedings
Stroški postopka
On the other hand, the Court does not meet the fees and expenses of the lawyer entitled to practice before a court of a Member State by whom the parties must be represented.
Vendar Sodišče ne nosi stroškov odvetnikov, ki dejavnost opravljajo v državah članicah in jih morajo stranke pooblastiti za zastopanje.
However, a party unable to meet all or part of the costs of the proceedings may, without having to instruct a lawyer, apply for legal aid.
Če stranka ne more plačati vseh stroškov sodnega postopka ali dela njih, lahko tudi brez posredovanja odvetnika zaprosi za brezplačno pravno pomoč.
The application must be accompanied by all necessary evidence establishing the need.
Prošnja mora vsebovati vsa dokazila, iz katerih je razvidna upravičenost do te pomoči.
The linguistic regime
Jezikovna pravila
In all direct actions, the language used in the application (which may be one of the 21 official languages of the European Union) will be the ‘language of the case’, that is to say the language in which the proceedings will be conducted.
V direktnih tožbah postane jezik, ki se uporablja v tožbi (in je lahko eden od 21 uradnih jezikov Evropske unije), jezik postopka v zadevi, to je jezik, v katerem bo postopek potekal.
With references for preliminary rulings, the language of the case is that of the national court which made the reference to the Court of Justice.
V postopkih predhodnega odločanja je jezik postopka jezik nacionalnega sodišča, ki se je obrnilo na Sodišče.
Oral proceedings at hearings are interpreted simultaneously, as required, into various official languages of the European Union.
Razprave, ki potekajo na obravnavah, se po potrebi simultano prevajajo v različne uradne jezike Evropske unije.
The judges deliberate, without interpreters, in a common language which, traditionally, is French.
Sodniki se brez tolmačev posvetujejo v skupnem jeziku, ki je tradicionalno francoščina.
Procedure before the Court of Justice
Postopek pred sodiščem
[Application for legal aid]
Sodno tajništvo tožbo vroči toženi stranki
Translation into the other official languages of the European Union
(Prošnja za pravno pomoč)
Notice of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling in the Official Journal of the EU (Series C)
Obvestilo o tožbi v Uradnem listu EU (serija C)
Notice of the action in the Official Journal of the EU (Series C)
Obvestilo o vprašanjih za predhodno odločanje v Uradnem listu EU (serija C)
Notification to the parties to the proceedings, the Member States, the Community institutions, the EEA States and to the EFTA Surveillance Authority
Vročitev strankam v postopku, državam članicam in institucijam Skupnosti, državam EGP, nadzornemu organu EFTE
Assignment of the case to a formation
Dodelitev zadeve sestavi
The Court of Justice: composition, jurisdiction and procedures
Sodišče: sestava, pristojnosti in postopki
For the purpose of European construction, the Member States (now 25 in number) concluded treaties creating first the European Communities and then a European Union, with institutions which adopt laws in specified areas.
Da bi zgradile Evropo, so države (danes jih je 25) med seboj sklenile pogodbe, s katerimi so bile ustanovljene Evropske skupnosti, pozneje Evropska unija, skupaj z institucijami, ki sprejemajo pravna pravila na določenih področjih.Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je sodna institucija Skupnosti.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities is the Community judicial institution.
Sestavljajo ga tri sodišča: Sodišče, Sodišče prve stopnje in Sodišče za uslužbence.
It comprises three courts: the Court of Justice, the Court of First Instance and the Civil Service Tribunal, whose essential tasks are to examine the legality of Community acts and to ensure the uniform interpretation and application of Community law.
Njihovi temeljni nalogi sta presoja zakonitosti aktov Skupnosti in zagotavljanje enotne razlage in uporabe prava Skupnosti.
THE COMPOSITION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE p
SESTAVA SODIŠČA p
The Court of Justice is composed of 25 Judges and eight Advocates General.
Sodišče sestavlja petindvajset sodnikov in osem generalnih pravobranilcev.
The Judges and Advocates General are appointed by common accord by the governments of the Member States for a renewable term of six years.
Sodnike in generalne pravobranilce v medsebojnem soglasju imenujejo vlade držav članic za obdobje šestih let z možnostjo ponovnega imenovanja.
They are chosen from among lawyers whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the qualifications required for appointment, in their respective countries, to the highest judicial offices, or who are of recognised competence.
Izbrani so med pravniki, katerih neodvisnost je nedvomna in ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za imenovanje na najvišje sodniške položaje v svojih državah ali so priznani pravniki.
The Judges of the Court elect one of themselves as President of the Court for a renewable term of three years.
Sodniki izvolijo predsednika Sodišča med svojimi člani za obdobje treh let z možnostjo ponovne izvolitve.
The President directs the work and staff of the Court and presides at hearings and deliberations of the full Court or the Grand Chamber.
Predsednik vodi delo in službe Sodišča ter predseduje obravnavam in posvetovanjem večjih sestav.
They are responsible for presenting, with complete impartiality and independence, an ‘opinion’ in the cases assigned to them.
Njihova naloga je nepristransko in neodvisno podati pravno mnenje, imenovano „sklepni predlogi“, v zadevah, ki so jim predložene.
The Registrar is the institution’s secretary general and manages its departments under the authority of the President of the Court.
Sodni tajnik je generalni sekretar institucije, katere službe vodi pod nadzorom predsednika Sodišča.
The Court may sit as a full court, in a Grand Chamber of 13 judges or in Chambers of three or five judges.
Sodišče lahko odloča na občni seji, v velikem senatu (trinajst sodnikov) ali v senatih treh oziroma petih sodnikov.
The Court sits as a full court in the particular cases prescribed by the Statute of the Court (proceedings to dismiss the European Ombudsman or a Member of the European Commission who has failed to fulfil his or her obligations, etc.) and where the Court considers that a case is of exceptional importance. It sits in a Grand Chamber when a Member State or an institution which is a party to the proceedings so requests, and in particularly complex or important cases.
Na občni seji odloča v posebnih primerih, določenih s Statutom Sodišča (če odloča o razrešitvi evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, komisarja, ki ni izpolnil svojih obveznosti, itd.), in kadar meni, da je zadeva izjemno pomembna.
Other cases are heard by Chambers of three or five judges.
Druge zadeve obravnavajo senati petih ali treh sodnikov.
The Presidents of the Chambers of five judges are elected for three years, and those of the Chambers of three judges for one year.
Predsedniki senatov petih sodnikov so izvoljeni za tri leta, predsedniki senatov treh sodnikov pa za eno leto.
To enable it properly to fulfil its task, the Court has been given clearly defined jurisdiction, which it exercises on references for preliminary rulings and in various categories of proceedings.
Da bi Sodišče lahko dobro opravljalo nalogo, so mu bile podeljene natančno opredeljene sodne pristojnosti, ki jih izvaja v okviru postopka predhodnega odločanja in različnih vrst tožb.
The various types of proceedings p
Posamezne vrste postopkov p
References for preliminary rulings The Court of Justice cooperates with all the courts of the Member States, which are the ordinary courts in matters of Community law.
Predlog za sprejem predhodne odločbe Sodišče pri delu sodeluje s sodišči držav članic, ki so splošno pristojna sodišča na področju prava Skupnosti.
To ensure the effective and uniform application of Community legislation and to prevent divergent interpretations, the national courts may, and sometimes must, refer to the Court of Justice and ask it to clarify a point concerning the interpretation of Community law, so that they may ascertain, for example, whether their national legislation complies with that law.
Da bi se zagotovila učinkovita in enotna uporaba zakonodaje Skupnosti in da bi se izognili kakršnim koli odstopanjem, se nacionalni sodniki lahko obrnejo, včasih se morajo, na Sodišče s predlogom za razjasnitev določenega vidika razlage prava Skupnosti, da bi lahko na primer preverili skladnost njihove nacionalne zakonodaje s tem pravom.
A reference for a preliminary ruling may also seek the review of the validity of an act of Community law.
Predlog za sprejem predhodne odločbe je lahko namenjen tudi nadzoru veljavnosti pravnih aktov Skupnosti.
The Court of Justice’s reply is not merely an opinion, but takes the form of a judgment or reasoned order.
Sodišče ne odgovori le s preprostim mnenjem, ampak s sodbo oziroma z obrazloženim sklepom.
The national court to which it is addressed is, in deciding the dispute before it, bound by the interpretation given.
Nacionalno sodišče je kot naslovnik odločbe pri obravnavanju spora vezano na dano razlago.
The Court of Justice’s judgment likewise binds other national courts before which the same problem is raised.
Sodba Sodišča je zavezujoča tudi za druga nacionalna sodišča, ki bi odločala o enakem problemu.
It is thus through references for preliminary rulings that any European citizen can seek clarification of the Community rules which affect him.
V okviru predlogov za sprejem predhodnih odločb lahko tudi vsak evropski državljan pridobi pojasnilo glede določb prava Skupnosti, ki ga zadevajo.
Although such a reference can be made only by a national court, all the parties to the proceedings before that court, the Member States and the European institutions may take part in the proceedings before the Court of Justice.
Čeprav lahko tak postopek sproži samo nacionalno sodišče, lahko vse stranke pred tem sodiščem, države članice in evropske institucije sodelujejo v postopku pred Sodiščem.
In that way, several important principles of Community law have been established by preliminary rulings, sometimes in reply to questions referred by national courts of first instance.
Več pomembnih načel prava Skupnosti je bilo opredeljenih na podlagi vprašanj za predhodno odločanje, ki so jih včasih predložila nacionalna sodišča prve stopnje.
Actions for failure to fulfil obligations These actions enable the Court of Justice to determine whether a Member State has fulfilled its obligations under Community law.
Tožba zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti Ta tožba omogoča Sodišču nadzor nad tem, ali države članice spoštujejo obveznosti, ki jih imajo na podlagi prava Skupnosti.
Before bringing the case before the Court of Justice, the Commission conducts a preliminary procedure in which the Member State is given the opportunity to reply to the complaints against it.
Preden Komisija zadevo predloži Sodišču, opravi predhodni postopek, v katerem da državi članici možnost, da odgovori na očitke.
If that procedure does not result in the Member State terminating the failure, an action for infringement of Community law may be brought before the Court of Justice.
Če država članica v okviru tega postopka svojih obveznosti ne izpolni, je mogoče pri Sodišču vložiti tožbo zaradi kršitve prava Skupnosti.
The action may be brought by the Commission — as, in practice, is usually the case — or by a Member State.
Postopek lahko sproži ali Komisija – kar je najpogosteje – ali druga država članica.
If the Court finds that an obligation has not been fulfilled, the State must bring the failure to an end without delay.
Če Sodišče ugotovi, da obveznost ni bila izpolnjena, jo mora država članica brez odlašanja izpolniti.
If, after a further action is brought by the Commission, the Court of Justice finds that the Member State concerned has not complied with its judgment, it may impose on it a fixed or periodic financial penalty.
Če Sodišče, potem ko je Komisija sprožila nov postopek, ugotovi, da zadevna država članica ni izvršila njegove sodbe, ji lahko na predlog Komisije naloži plačilo pavšalnega zneska in/ali denarne kazni.
Actions for annulment By an action for annulment, the applicant seeks the annulment of a measure (regulation, directive or decision) adopted by an institution.
Ničnostna tožba S to tožbo tožeča stranka zahteva razglasitev ničnosti akta institucije (uredbe, direktive, odločbe).
The Court of Justice has exclusive jurisdiction over actions brought by a Member State against the European Parliament and/or against the Council (apart from Council measures in respect of State aid, dumping and implementing powers) or brought by one Community institution against another.
V pristojnosti Sodišča so tožbe države članice proti Evropskemu parlamentu in/ali Svetu (razen proti aktom zadnjega s področja državnih pomoči, dumpinga in izvršilnih pooblastil) oziroma tožbe ene institucije Skupnosti proti drugi.
The Court of First Instance has jurisdiction, at first instance, in all other actions of this type and particularly in actions brought by individuals.
Sodišče prve stopnje je pristojno za obravnavanje vseh drugih tožb te vrste, predvsem tožb, ki jih vložijo posamezniki, na prvi stopnji.
Actions for failure to act These actions enable the lawfulness of Community institutions’ failures to act to be reviewed.
Tožba zaradi nedelovanja Ta tožba omogoča nadzor zakonitosti nedelovanja institucij Skupnosti.
However, such an action may be brought only after the institution concerned has been called on to act.
Vložiti jo je mogoče le potem, ko je bila neka institucija pozvana k delovanju.
Where the failure to act is held to be unlawful, it is for the institution concerned to put an end to the failure by appropriate measures.
Če se ugotovi nezakonitost opustitve, mora zadevna institucija sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za prenehanje nedelovanja.
Jurisdiction to hear actions for failure to act is shared between the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance according to the same criteria as for actions for annulment.
Pristojnost za tožbo zaradi nedelovanja si delita Sodišče in Sodišče prve stopnje po enakih merilih, kot veljajo za ničnostne tožbe.
Appeals Appeals on points of law only may be brought before the Court of Justice against judgments and orders of the Court of First Instance.
Pritožba Pri Sodišču je mogoče vložiti pritožbe zoper sodbe in sklepe Sodišča prve stopnje, pritožbe so omejene na pravna vprašanja.
If the appeal is admissible and well founded, the Court of Justice sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance.
Če je pritožba dopustna in utemeljena, Sodišče odločitev Sodišča prve stopnje razveljavi.
Where the state of the proceedings so permits, the Court may itself decide the case.
Če je zadeva zrela za odločanje, lahko Sodišče samo odloči o sporu.
Otherwise, the Court must refer the case back to the Court of First Instance, which is bound by the decision given on the appeal.
V nasprotnem primeru mora zadevo vrniti Sodišču prve stopnje, ki je vezano na odločitev v pritožbi.
Reviews Decisions of the Court of First Instance on appeals against decisions of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal may, in exceptional circumstances, be reviewed by the Court of Justice.
Revizija Odločitve Sodišča prve stopnje o pritožbah zoper odločitve Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije so lahko izjemoma predmet revizijskega postopka Sodišča.
Whatever the type of case, there is always a written stage and usually an oral stage, which takes place in open court.
Ne glede na naravo zadeve ta zajema pisni in po navadi ustni postopek, ki je javen.
However, a distinction must be drawn between, first, references for preliminary rulings and, second, other actions, known as ‘direct actions’.
Vendar je treba razlikovati med postopki s predlogi za sprejem predhodnih odločb in drugimi postopki, tako imenovanimi direktnimi tožbami.
Commencement of proceedings before the Court and the written procedure p
Predložitev Sodišču in pisni postopek p
When that request has been translated into all the Community languages by the Court’s translation service, the Registry notifies it to the parties to the national proceedings, and also to all the Member States and the institutions.
V postopkih predhodnega odločanja Nacionalno sodišče vprašanja o razlagi ali veljavnosti določbe prava Skupnosti Sodišču navadno predloži s sodno odločbo v skladu z nacionalnimi postopkovnimi pravili.
The parties, the Member States and the institutions of the European Union have two months within which to submit written observations to the Court of Justice.
Potem ko je predlog v prevajalski službi Sodišča preveden v vse jezike Skupnosti, ga sodni tajnik vroči ne samo strankam postopka v glavni stvari, ampak tudi državam članicam in institucijam.
In direct actions An action before the Court must be brought by application addressed to the Registry.
Sodni tajnik poskrbi za to, da se v Uradnem listu objavi obvestilo z navedbo strank in vsebino vprašanj.
The Registrar publishes a notice of the action in the Official Journal, setting out the applicant’s claims and arguments.
Stranke, države članice in institucije Evropske unije lahko Sodišču v dveh mesecih predložijo pisna stališča.
At the same time, the application is served on the party sued, who has one month within which to lodge a defence.
V direktnih tožbah Zadeva mora biti predložena Sodišču s pisno vlogo, naslovljeno na sodno tajništvo Sodišča.
The applicant may lodge a reply and the defendant a rejoinder, the time allowed being one month in each case.
Sodni tajnik objavi obvestilo o tožbi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, v katerem navede tožbene razloge in predloge tožeče stranke.
The time-limits for lodging these documents must be complied with unless an extension is granted by the President.
Hkrati se tožba vroči nasprotni stranki, ki ima mesec dni časa, da vloži odgovor na tožbo.
In both types of action, a Judge-Rapporteur and an Advocate General, responsible for monitoring the progress of the case, are appointed by the President and the First Advocate General respectively.
V obeh postopkih predsednik oziroma prvi generalni pravobranilec določita sodnika poročevalca oziroma generalnega pravobranilca, ki sta zadolžena, da spremljata potek zadeve.
In all proceedings, once the written procedure is closed, the parties are asked to state, within one month, whether and why they wish a hearing to be held.
Pripravljalne poizvedbe in poročilo za obravnavo Ko je pisni postopek zaključen, se stranke v vseh postopkih pozove, naj v roku enega meseca sporočijo, ali in zakaj predlagajo izvedbo ustne obravnave.
The Court decides, after reading the report of the Judge-Rapporteur and hearing the views of the Advocate General, whether any preparatory inquiries are needed, what type of formation the case should be assigned to, and whether a hearing should be held for oral argument, for which the President will fix the date.
Sodišče po seznanitvi s poročilom sodnika poročevalca in po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca odloči, ali je v zadevi potreben kateri od pripravljalnih ukrepov, v kateri sestavi naj Sodišče zadevo obravnava in ali je treba izvesti ustno obravnavo, narok za katero določi predsednik.
The Judge-Rapporteur summarises, in a report for the hearing, the facts alleged and the arguments of the parties and any interveners.
V poročilu za obravnavo sodnik poročevalec na kratko povzame zatrjevana dejstva in trditve strank ter glede na okoliščine primera tudi intervenientov.
The report is made public in the language of the case at the hearing.
To poročilo je na obravnavi objavljeno v jeziku postopka.
The public hearing and the Advocate General’s opinion
Javna obravnava in sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca
The case is argued at a public hearing, before the bench and the Advocate General.
Zadeva se obravnava na javni obravnavi pred sestavo Sodišča in generalnim pravobranilcem.
The judges and the Advocate General may put to the parties any questions they consider appropriate.
Sodniki in generalni pravobranilec lahko strankam postavljajo vprašanja, za katera menijo, da so primerna.
Some weeks later, the Advocate General delivers his opinion before the Court of Justice, again in open court.
Generalni pravobranilec nekaj tednov pozneje spet na javni obravnavi Sodišču predstavi svoje sklepne predloge.
He or she analyses in detail the legal aspects of the case and suggests completely independently to the Court of Justice the response which he or she considers should be given to the problem raised.
V njih podrobno razčleni predvsem pravne vidike spora in popolnoma neodvisen od Sodišča le-temu predlaga rešitev problema, za katero meni, da bi jo bilo treba sprejeti.
This marks the end of the oral procedure.
Ustni postopek je s tem zaključen.
If it is decided that the case raises no new question of law, the Court may decide, after hearing the Advocate General, to give judgment without an opinion.
Če zadeva po mnenju Sodišča ne odpira novega pravnega vprašanja, lahko to po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca odloči, da bo razsodilo brez sklepnih predlogov.
Judgments
Sodbe
The judges deliberate on the basis of a draft judgment drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur.
Podlaga za posvetovanje sodnikov je osnutek sodbe, ki ga sestavi sodnik poročevalec.
Each judge of the formation concerned may propose changes.
Vsak sodnik v zadevni sestavi lahko predlaga spremembe.
Judgments are signed by all the judges who took part in the deliberation and their operative part is pronounced in open court.
Odločitve Sodišča so sprejete z večino glasov in brez morebitnih ločenih mnenj.
They are, in most cases, subsequently published in the European Court Reports.
Sodbe podpišejo vsi sodniki, ki so sodelovali pri odločanju, njihov izrek pa se
Procedure before the Civil Service Tribunal
Postopek pred Sodiščem za uslužbence
Written phase
Pisni del
European Union Civil Service Tribunal
Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije