natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It follows from the above findings that the principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation, laid down in Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2887/2000, is to be understood as the obligation on notified operators, in the course of the gradual opening of the telecommunications market to competition, to set those rates in accordance with the costs incurred in putting in place the local loop, while deriving a reasonable return from the setting of those rates in order to ensure the longterm development and upgrade of existing telecommunications infrastructures.
Iz zgoraj navedenega izhaja, da je načelo stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke iz člena 3(3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000 treba razumeti kot obveznost prigla�enih obratovalcev v okviru postopnega odpiranja telekomunikacijskega trga za konkurenco, da te cene oblikujejo glede na stro�ke, ki jih imajo za vzpostavitev krajevne zanke, pri čemer jim morajo navedene cene omogočati primeren donos, s katerim zagotavljajo dolgoročni razvoj in nadgradnjo obstoječe telekomunikacijske infrastrukture.
However, as has been pointed out in paragraph 67 above, it is apparent from reading recital 11 in the preamble to Regulation No 2887/2000, in conjunction with Article 3(3) of that regulation, that the notified operator is to offer tariffs for unbundled access to the local loop in accordance with the costs it has already incurred in putting the local network in place and, with the remuneration it receives, ensures the economic viability of that network.
Vendar pa, kot je navedeno zlasti v točki 67 te sodbe, iz razlage uvodne izjave 11 Uredbe �t. 2887/2000 v zvezi s členom 3(3) te uredbe izhaja, da prigla�eni obratovalec predloge cen za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke oblikuje na podlagi stro�kov, ki jih je imel za vzpostavitev krajevne zanke, z donosom pa zagotavlja ekonomsko preživetje navedenega omrežja.
It follows from those provisions that, in providing unbundled access to its local loop to other telecommunications operators, the notified operator reflects in particular in the proposed tariffs the costs relating to the investments made.
Iz teh določb izhaja, da so v cene, ki jih prigla�eni obratovalec predlaga za omogočanje razvezanega dostopa do svoje krajevne zanke drugim obratovalcem na področju telekomunikacij, vključeni zlasti stro�ki, povezani z izvedenimi naložbami.
Therefore, in fixing the tariffs for unbundled access to the local loop, account must be taken of the costs which the notified operator had to incur for the investments made in putting its local infrastructures in place.
Zato je treba pri določanju cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke upo�tevati stro�ke, ki jih je imel prigla�eni obratovalec v okviru naložb, izvedenih za vzpostavitev krajevne infrastrukture.
That conclusion is confirmed, first, by Annex IV to Directive 97/33 which refers, by way of example, to elements for interconnection charges, namely actual charges payable by interconnected parties.
Ta sklep, prvič, potrjuje Priloga IV k Direktivi 97/33, v kateri so primeroma na�teti elementi pristojbin za medomrežno povezovanje, in sicer dejanskih pristojbin, ki jih plačujejo stranke medomrežnih povezav.
That annex mentions, inter alia, charges to cover initial implementation of the physical interconnection, rental charges to cover on-going use of equipment and resources, variable charges for ancillary and supplementary services, and traffic related charges.
V tej prilogi so navedeni zlasti stro�ki, s katerimi se krije vzpostavitev fizične medomrežne povezave, stro�ki najema, s katerimi se krije redna uporaba opreme in naprav, spremenljivi stro�ki pomožnih in dodatnih storitev ter stro�ki prometa.
In that context, Annex V to that directive contains, second, and by way of example, a list of costs which must be taken into account when setting interconnection charges and which relate to the investments made, such as costs based on actual expenditure incurred for equipment and systems.
V tem okviru vsebuje, drugič, Priloga V k tej direktivi seznam primerov stro�kov, ki jih je treba upo�tevati pri določanju pristojbin za medomrežno povezovanje in ki se nana�ajo na izvedene naložbe, kot so zlasti stro�ki, ki izhajajo iz izdatkov za opremo in sistem medomrežne povezave.
It is in those circumstances that the national court asks the Court of Justice whether interest and depreciation are encompassed by the costs which have to be taken into consideration when setting tariffs for unbundled access to the local loop in accordance with the principle laid down in Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2887/2000.
Glede na to predložitveno sodi�če Sodi�če spra�uje, ali je treba med stro�ke, ki jih je treba upo�tevati pri določanju cen za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke v skladu z načelom iz člena 3(3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000, pri�teti tudi pripisane obresti in amortizacijo.
Even if in its question the national court makes a general reference to interest and depreciation, it is apparent from the decision to refer, from the context of the dispute
Čeprav se predložitveno sodi�če v svojem vpra�anju na splo�no sklicuje na pripisane obresti in amortizacijo, iz predložitvene odločbe, celote okoli�čin spora o glavni
2008 — CASE C-55/06 in the main proceedings and the observations submitted to the Court of Justice that it is essentially necessary to examine whether the interest on the capital invested and the depreciation of the fixed assets deployed for the initial implementation of the local telecommunications infrastructures are encompassed by such costs.
2008 – ZADEVA C-55/06 stvari in stali�č, predstavljenih Sodi�ču, izhaja, da je treba v bistvu preučiti, ali je treba med te stro�ke pri�teti obresti na vloženi kapital in amortizacijo osnovnih sredstev, uporabljenih za vzpostavitev krajevne telekomunikacijske infrastrukture.
The interest on the capital invested are costs to be taken into account to set rates for unbundled access to the local loop in accordance with the principle laid down in Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2887/2000.
Pri obrestih na vloženi kapital gre za stro�ke, ki jih je treba upo�tevati pri določanju cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke v skladu z načelom iz člena 3(3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000.
Those costs represent the revenue which would have been earned on that capital had it not been invested in the local loop.
Ti stro�ki so namreč prihodek, ki bi ga ta kapital prinesel, če ne bi bil vložen v krajevno zanko.
The same is true of interest on loans, which represents, in reality, the cost of the debt incurred in connection with investments made in the initial implementation of the local loop.
Enako velja za obresti na posojila, ki dejansko pomenijo stro�ke dolga v okviru naložb, izvedenih za vzpostavitev krajevne zanke.
As regards the depreciation of the fixed assets deployed for the construction of the local network, it should be noted that the taking into account of that depreciation makes it possible to catch the loss in real value of those assets and constitutes a cost for the notified operator.
V zvezi z amortizacijo osnovnih sredstev, uporabljenih za vzpostavitev krajevnega omrežja, je treba ugotoviti, da se z upo�tevanjem te amortizacije nadome�ča zmanj�evanje dejanske vrednosti teh sredstev, kar za prigla�enega obratovalca pomeni stro�ek.
In that regard, that depreciation relates to the investments made by the notified operator in the initial implementation of the local loop and, consequently, it falls within the operating costs which need to be taken into account in accordance with the pricing principle laid down in Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2887/2000.
V zvezi s tem je treba podrobneje pojasniti, da se navedena amortizacija nana�a na naložbe, ki jih mora prigla�eni obratovalec izvesti za vzpostavitev krajevne zanke, in zato sodi med stro�ke uporabe, ki jih je treba upo�tevati v skladu z načelom oblikovanja cen iz člena 3(3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000.
That finding is confirmed, in addition, by Annex V to Directive 97/33 which provides that among the elements which may be included in the cost accounting system are the accounting conventions used for the treatment of costs covering the timescale for depreciation of major categories of fixed assets.
To ugotovitev med drugim potrjuje Priloga V k Direktivi 97/33, v kateri so med elementi, ki jih je mogoče vključiti v sistem stro�kovnega računovodstva, navedeni računovodski dogovori, ki se uporabljajo za obravnavanje stro�kov, ki pomenijo amortizacijsko dobo glavnih kategorij osnovnih sredstev.
Also to that effect, Recommendation 98/322, whose annex concerning the guidelines on implementing accounting separation refers, in point 4 thereof, to operating costs of operators and includes among the costs — thus the costs incurred — depreciation.
V tem smislu je enako navedeno v Priporočilu 98/322, katerega Priloga o smernicah za vzpostavitev ločenega računovodstva se v točki 4 sklicuje na stro�ke uporabe, ki jih nosijo obratovalci, med katere je vključena amortizacija.
That same point of the annex to Recommendation 98/322 also refers to the cost allocation process, described in point 3 of that annex, and states that that process is valid for operating costs and investment costs and, in that regard, it expressly refers to depreciation as a category of operating costs.
V isti točki Priloge k Priporočilu 98/322 je omenjen tudi postopek pripisa stro�kov, opisan v točki 3 te priloge, pri čemer je podrobneje navedeno, da se ta postopek uporablja za stro�ke uporabe in za naložbene izdatke, v zvezi s tem pa je amortizacija izrecno navedena kot ena izmed kategorij stro�kov uporabe.
It follows from all of the above considerations that the answer to Question 2 must be that the interest on the capital invested and the depreciation of the fixed assets deployed for the initial implementation of the local loop are among the costs to be taken into account in accordance with the principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation, laid down in Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2887/2000.
Iz celote navedenih ugotovitev izhaja, da je treba na drugo vpra�anje odgovoriti tako, da se obresti na vloženi kapital in amortizacija osnovnih sredstev, uporabljenih za vzpostavitev krajevne zanke, pri�tevajo med stro�ke, ki jih je treba upo�tevati v skladu z načelom stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke iz člena 3(3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000.
The national court requests the Court to answer the question whether the calculation basis of costs which must be taken into account when setting rates for unbundled
Predložitveno sodi�če predlaga Sodi�ču, naj se opredeli do vpra�anja, ali je osnova za izračun stro�kov, ki jih je treba upo�tevati pri določanju cen za razvezani dostop do
2008 — CASE C-55/06 access to the local loop is the replacement value of the assets after the deduction for depreciation made prior to the time of valuation, or exclusively the current replacement value, expressed in terms of current prices at the time of valuation.
2008 – ZADEVA C-55/06 krajevne zanke, nadomestna vrednost sredstev, zmanj�ana za amortizacijo, izkazano do trenutka vrednotenja, ali pa izključno trenutna nadomestna vrednost, izražena v dnevnih cenah v trenutku vrednotenja.
By that question the national court asks whether the calculation basis of costs must be based on the costs which represent the construction ex nihilo by an operator, other than the notified operator, of a new local access infrastructure for the provision of equivalent telecommunications services (‘the current cost’) or on the costs actually incurred by the notified operator and taking account of depreciation already made (‘the historic cost’).
Predložitveno sodi�če s tem vpra�anjem spra�uje, ali mora osnova za izračun stro�kov temeljiti na stro�kih, ki bi jih imel z izgradnjo ex nihilo nove infrastrukture krajevnega dostopa za zagotavljanje enakovrednih telekomunikacijskih storitev (v nadaljevanju: tekoči stro�ki) vsak obratovalec razen prigla�enega obratovalca, ali pa na stro�kih, ki jih prigla�eni obratovalec dejansko nosi ob upo�tevanju izvedene amortizacije (v nadaljevanju: pretekli stro�ki).
In those circumstances, it needs to be examined whether Directives 97/33 and 98/10, which Regulation No 2887/2000 seeks to supplement, contain any guidance on that issue.
Glede na to je treba preučiti, ali so tovrstne navedbe vključene v direktivi 97/33 in 98/10, ki ju Uredba �t. 2887/2000 dopolnjuje.
In the first place, Deutsche Telekom, the German Government and the Bundesrepublik Deutschland, as party to the main proceedings, submit that, in spite of the lack of guidance in Regulation No 2887/2000 and the directives of the FRF applicable in the case in the main proceedings, significant indications do exist that the Community legislature opted in favour of a calculation method based on current costs.
Prvič, v zvezi s tem družba Deutsche Telekom, nem�ka vlada in Bundesrepublik Deutschland kot stranka v postopku v glavni stvari zatrjujejo, da ne glede na to, da v Uredbi �t. 2887/2000 in direktivah NekdRO, ki jih je treba uporabiti v postopku v glavni stvari, ni določena metoda za izračun stro�kov, obstajajo pomenljive določbe, s katerimi se je zakonodajalec Skupnosti opredelil za metodo, ki temelji na tekočih stro�kih.
Indications to that effect are said to be apparent, first, from point 6 of Recommendation 98/195, which provides that activity-based allocations are to use current costs rather than historic costs, and that same point of the recommendation shows that the NRAs set deadlines for their notified operators to implement new costs accounting systems based on current costs where such systems are not already in place.
Prvič, določbe v tem smislu naj bi izhajale iz točke 6 Priporočila 98/195, v kateri je določeno, da se pri pripisovanju stro�kov na osnovi posameznih dejavnosti upo�teva tekoče stro�ke, ne pa preteklih. Iz iste točke tega priporočila naj bi izhajalo, da NRO določijo roke, v katerih morajo prigla�eni obratovalci vzpostaviti nove sisteme stro�kovnega računovodstva, ki temeljijo na tekočih stro�kih, če ti sistemi �e ne obstajajo.
The same goes, second, for point 4 of Recommendation 98/322 which provides that the evaluation of network assets at forwardlooking or current value of an efficient operator is a key element of the current cost accounting methodology.
Drugič, enako naj bi izhajalo iz točke 4 Priporočila 98/322, ki določa, da je vrednotenje sredstev omrežja po predvideni ali trenutni vrednosti učinkovitega obratovalca temeljni element metode računovodstva tekočih stro�kov.
Third, Article 1(6) of Recommendation 2000/417 confirms the abovementioned indications in providing that, in the application of the principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation, as a general rule current costs have to be taken into account, namely the costs of building an efficient modern equivalent infrastructure and providing such a service at the time of valuation of the network.
Tretjič, v zvezi s tem naj bi Priporočilo 2000/417 potrjevalo zgornje navedbe, s tem da v členu 1(6) določa, da je treba v okviru uporabe načela stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke načeloma upo�tevati tekoče stro�ke oziroma stro�ke, v katerih sta v trenutku vrednotenja omrežja zajeta izgradnja enakovredne učinkovite moderne infrastrukture in opravljanje te vrste storitev.
Fourth, point 6 of Communication 2000/C 272/10, entitled ‘Duties of national regulatory and competition authorities’, also refers to the pricing system based on current costs.
Četrtič, v tem smislu naj bi se tudi Sporočilo 2000/C 272/10 v točki 6 z naslovom „Obveznosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov in organov za varstvo konkurence“ nana�alo na sistem oblikovanja cen, ki temelji na tekočih stro�kih.
In response to that line of argument, the Court finds that it is necessary to rely on Recommendation 2000/417 which, as opposed to the other recommendations cited above, concerns specifically unbundled access to the local loop and also refers to Directives 97/33 and 98/10.
V odgovor na to utemeljevanje se je treba opreti na Priporočilo 2000/417, ki se glede na druga zgoraj navedena priporočila nana�a prav na razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke, hkrati pa se sklicuje na direktivi 97/33 in 98/10.
Even if recommendations are not intended to produce
Čeprav priporočila nimajo zavezujočega učinka, jih morajo nacionalna sodi�ča upo�tevati pri re�evanju sporov,
Article 1(6) of Recommendation 2000/417 lays down the principle of a forwardlooking approach based on current costs.
Člen 1(6) Priporočila 2000/417 določa načelo v prihodnost usmerjenega pristopa, ki temelji na tekočih stro�kih.
As is apparent from that provision, that approach will foster fair and sustainable competition and provide alternative investment incentives.
Kot izhaja iz te določbe, tak pristop omogoča spodbujanje pravične in trajnostne konkurence in spodbuja k novim investicijam.
However, it is clear from that provision that a different approach, in particular one based on historic costs to avoid distortions of competition, cannot be ruled out.
Vendar pa iz iste določbe jasno izhaja, da drugačen pristop, zlasti tak, ki bi zaradi preprečevanja izkrivljanja konkurence temeljil na preteklih stro�kih, ni izključen.
Thus, the NRA is in a position to take account of each individual competitive situation.
Tako lahko NRO upo�teva vsak posamezen konkurenčni položaj.
In the second place, Deutsche Telekom, the German Government and the Bundesrepublik Deutschland, as party to the main proceedings, submit that, even supposing that it is not apparent from the regulatory framework applicable in the case in the main proceedings that the calculation of costs must be based on current costs, economic considerations specific to the telecommunications sector require in any case, as shown by the practice followed in certain Member States, a method of calculation based exclusively on those costs.
Drugič, družba Deutsche Telekom, nem�ka vlada in Bundesrepublik Deutschland kot stranka v postopku v glavni stvari zatrjujejo, da bi, tudi če iz regulativnega okvira, ki ga je treba uporabiti v postopku v glavni stvari, ne bi izhajalo, da mora osnova za izračun stro�kov temeljiti na tekočih stro�kih, metodo izračunavanja, ki temelji izključno na teh stro�kih, vsekakor narekovali specifični gospodarski razlogi v telekomunikacijskem sektorju, kar kaže tudi praksa v nekaterih državah članicah.
In that regard, it must be held that, in view of the technological evolution in the telecommunications sector, it is possible that the current cost of certain investments, related in particular to the material used for the network put in place, may, in certain cases, be lower than the historic cost.
V zvezi s tem je treba upo�tevati, da glede na tehnolo�ki razvoj na področju telekomunikacij ni izključeno, da so lahko tekoči stro�ki nekaterih naložb, zlasti tistih, ki se nana�ajo na opremo vzpostavljenega omrežja, v določenih primerih nižji od preteklih stro�kov.
It follows that the possibility for the notified operator to base the calculation basis of costs exclusively on the current costs of its investments enables it, in reality, to choose those which could enable it to set rates for unbundled access to the local loop as high as possible and to not take account of pricing elements which would favour beneficiaries.
Iz tega izhaja, da prigla�enemu obratovalcu možnost, da za osnovo za izračun stro�kov uporabi izključno tekoče stro�ke svojih naložb, pravzaprav omogoča, da izbere tiste, na podlagi katerih ima možnost določiti najvi�je mogoče cene za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke, in da prezre elemente oblikovanja cen, ki bi koristili upravičencem.
In that respect, the notified operator could effectively circumvent the rules concerning the setting of rates for unbundled access to the local loop on the basis of costorientation.
V tem smislu bi lahko prigla�eni obratovalec dejansko ob�el pravila o določanju cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke na podlagi stro�kov.
It must thus be held that a method of calculation based exclusively on current costs is also not the most appropriate method of applying the principle that rates for unbundled access to the local loop are to be set on the basis of costorientation.
Zato je treba ugotoviti, da metoda izračuna, ki temelji izključno na tekočih stro�kih, prav tako ni najustreznej�a metoda v okviru uporabe načela stro�kovne naravnanosti cen razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke.
In that regard, it should be pointed out, first, that unbundled access to the local loop enables new telecommunications operators, which do not own their own infrastructures, to enter into competition with notified operators by using the latters’ infrastructures.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti, prvič, da razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke novim obratovalcem na področju telekomunikacij, ki nimajo lastne infrastrukture, omogoča, da konkurirajo prigla�enim obratovalcem in pri tem uporabljajo njihovo infrastrukturo.
As indicated in recital 6 in the preamble to Regulation No 2887/2000, it would be impossible to rapidly open the telecommunications sector to competition if it were necessary to wait for every operator concerned to be able to construct its own local infrastructure.
Kot je navedeno v uvodni izjavi 6 Uredbe �t. 2887/2000, telekomunikacijskega sektorja namreč ne bi bilo mogoče hitro odpreti za konkurenco, če bi bilo treba čakati, da vsak zadeven obratovalec zgradi lastno krajevno infrastrukturo.
It is precisely with the aim of avoiding a new distortion of competition related to the lack of new networks for operators other than notified operators that Regulation No 2887/2000 provided for unbundled access to the local loop.
Razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke je v Uredbi �t. 2887/2000 predviden prav zato, da bi se izognili novim izkrivljanjem konkurence, ki bi nastajala, ker obratovalci, razen prigla�enih obratovalcev, nimajo novih omrežij.
In those circumstances, it should be pointed out, second, that the pricing rule laid down in Article 3(3) of that regulation ensures that the local loop provider is able to cover its related costs in this regard plus a reasonable return in order to ensure the longterm development and upgrade of local access infrastructure.
Glede na to je treba opozoriti, drugič, da pravilo o oblikovanju cen iz člena 3(3) navedene uredbe ponudniku krajevne zanke omogoča, da krije s tem povezane stro�ke, pri čemer ima primeren donos, s čimer se zagotavlja dolgoročni razvoj in nadgrajuje infrastruktura krajevnega dostopa.
Consequently, if, as claimed by Arcor, for the application of the pricing rule laid down in Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2887/2000, the cost calculation basis were based exclusively on historic costs, which, depending of the age of the network, could potentially lead to account being taken of an almost entirely depreciated network and thus result in a very low tariff, the notified operator would be faced with unjustified disadvantages.
Če bi torej, kot to predlaga družba Arcor, uporaba pravila o oblikovanju cen iz člena 3(3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000 pomenila, da se za osnovo za izračun stro�kov uporabijo izključno pretekli stro�ki – kar bi glede na starost omrežja morebiti narekovalo upo�tevanje že skorajda amortiziranega omrežja, to pa bi pomenilo zelo nizke cene – bi se prigla�eni obratovalec zna�el v položaju, ko bi bil neupravičeno o�kodovan.
First, it would be required to open its network to competitors and, consequently, to accept the potential loss of part of its clientele.
Na eni strani bi moral svoje omrežje odpreti konkurentom in torej sprejeti morebitno izgubo dela strank.