natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
OWen they are simply looking for an explanation, a reason, an apology or advice, and the administration itself is best situated to provide this.
Pogosto išÏejo samo razlago, razlog, opraviÏilo ali nasvet, kar jim lahko najbolje zagotovi uprava sama.
If citizens do feel the need to complain, they want the problem resolved as rapidly and eT ectively as possible.
Je državljani ob Ï u t ` o potrebo po pritožbi, žel`o, da se težava reši Ïim hitreje in Ïim bolj uÏinkovito.
To my mind, a semlement proposed by the administration is quicker and ultimately more satisfying all round, since it credits the institution with solving the problem, increases its legitimacy in the eyes of the complainant and ensures a win-win outcome for all concerned.
Po mojem je rešitev, ki jo predlaga uprava, hitrejša in konÏno tudi bolj ugodna za vse, saj instituc` i tako pripadejo zasluge za rešitev težave, poveÏa se njena legitimnost v oÏeh pritožnika in konÏni rezultat je ugoden za vse vpletene strani.
Put otherwise, the way in which the public administration reacts to complaints is a key measure of how citizen-focused it is.
Z drugimi besedami, naÏin, na katerega se javna uprava odzove na pritožbe, je kljuÏno merilo njene osredotoÏenosti na državljane.
This is a key message that I aimed to communicate during the various events we organised with the EU institutions and bodies during our anniversary year.
To je kljuÏno sporoÏilo, ki sem ga poskušal posredovati na razliÏnih dogodkih, ki smo jih z organi in instituc`ami EU organizirali v jubilejnem letu.
Each EU institution and body can play its part in improving relations with citizens. Whether it be tackling contractual problems, providing access to documents, or explaining why a candidate has not been selected, we can all learn about how to deliver bemer services from complaints.
UVOD je, da imajo vsi, ki na doloÏeni stopnji prihajajo v stik z instituc`ami – ne zgolj pritožniki – koristi od dela varuha Ïlovekovih pravic.
Complaints are o W en symptoms of more serious, complex or systemic issues or problems.
Pritožbe so pogosto znamenja resnejših, bolj zapletenih in sistemskih vprašanj oziroma težav.
One of the Ombudsman’s functions is to identify these and to promote ways of tackling them.
Ena od funkc` varuha Ïlovekovih pravic je njihova doloÏitev in spodbujanje naÏinov za njihovo reševanje.
As such, the Ombudsman, in addition to serving as an external mechanism of control, also constitutes a valuable resource to managers, a resource capable of helping the administration to bemer its performance by directing amention to areas for improvement.
Poleg tega, da je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic kot tak zunanji mehanizem nadzora, je tudi dragocen vir za vodstvene kadre, vir, ki lahko upravi pomaga izboljšati delovanje z usmerjanjem pozornosti na podroÏja, na katerih so izboljšave potrebne.
An invaluable instrument in this context is the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour.
Neprecenljiv instrument v tem okviru je Evropski kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev.
It equally serves as a useful guide for civil servants, encouraging the highest standards of administration.
Kodeks, ki ga je Evropski parlament potrdil leta 2001, državljanom razlaga, kaj lahko upraviÏeno priÏakujejo od evropske uprave.
A new edition of the Code was published in 24 languages in 2005.
Nova izdaja kodeksa je bila objavljena v 24 jezikih leta 2005.
Over 100 000 copies were distributed throughout Europe and beyond.
Po vsej Evropi in zunaj nje je bilo razdeljenih veÏ kot 100 000 izvodov.
In response, national administrations and local authorities, schools and universities, training centres and public libraries, along with individual citizens, asked for copies for further distribution.
Kot odgovor so nacionalne uprave in lokalne oblasti, šole in univerze, centri za usposabljanje in javne knjižnice skupaj s posamezniki prosili za izvode za nadaljnjo distribuc`o.
This truly is a European success story.
To je resniÏno evropska zgodba o uspehu.
The Code has been adapted for national, regional and local administrations from Portugal to Italy, from Wallonia to Greece, and from Romania to Croatia.
Kodeks je bil prilagojen nacionalnim, regionalnim in lokalnim upravam od Portugalske do Ital`e, od Valonske reg`e do G r Ï ` e ter od Romun`e do Hrvaške.
In light of the fact that the European Code has been taken on board by such a range of administrations throughout Europe, I continue to hope that it can be adopted by all EU institutions and bodies, perhaps in the form of an interinstitutional agreement.
Ker je evropski kodeks upoštevalo toliko uprav po vsej Evropi, še naprej upam, da ga lahko sprejmejo vse instituc` e in organi EU, mogoÏe v obliki medinstitucionalnega sporazuma.
This would oTer a clear sign of our joint determination to work together for citizens in the years to come.
To bi bil jasen znak naše skupne odloÏenosti za sodelovanje v korist državljanov v prihodnjih letih.
A move that I found greatly encouraging in 2005 was the Communication adopted by the Commission introducing a new internal procedure for responding to the Ombudsman’s inquiries.
V letu 2005 se mi je zdelo zelo spodbudno, da je Komis` a sprejela sporoÏilo, s katerim uvaja nov interni postopek za odzivanje na preiskave varuha Ïlovekovih pravic.
This Communication foresees individual Commissioners taking strong political ownership of each case, while maintaining the valuable role of the Secretariat-General.
To sporoÏilo predvideva, da se posamezni komisarji moÏno politiÏno zavzamejo za vsak primer in pri tem ohran`o dragoceno vlogo generalnega sekretariata.
I very much welcome this new procedure which, I understand, aims to enhance the consistency and quality of the Commission’s replies, as well as to ensure prompt follow-up of the Ombudsman’s recommendations and remarks.
MoÏno pozdravljam ta novi postopek, ki si po mojem mnenju prizadeva poveÏati usklajenost in kakovost odgovorov Komis` e ter zagotoviti hitro spremljanje izvajanja priporoÏil in pripomb varuha Ïlovekovih pravic.
As the institution that gives rise to around 70% of the Ombudsman’s inquiries, it is vital that the Commission take a leading role in dealing with maladministration and in promoting a service culture with respect to citizens.
Komis` a mora imeti kot instituc` a, ki povzroÏa okoli 70 % preiskav varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, vodilno vlogo pri odpravljanju nepravilnosti in spodbujanju kulture storitev v zvezi z državljani.
This Annual Report contains many examples of cases in which the Commission did indeed react promptly and constructively to resolve problems that I brought to its amention. ention.
To letno poroÏilo vsebuje številne primere, pri katerih se je Komis` a dejansko odzvala hitro in konstruktivno, da bi rešila težave, na katere sem jo opozoril.
Cooperation within the European Network of Ombudsmen
Sodelovanje znotraj Evropske mreže varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic
Since the early years, the European Ombudsman has co-operated closely with his colleagues at the national, regional and local levels through the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Evropski varuh Ïlovekovih pravic že od prvih let tesno sodeluje s kolegi na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni prek Evropske mreže varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic.
The central purpose of the Network remains as valid and important today as it was at the outset: that is, to make citizens’ and residents’ rights under EU law a living reality.
Osrednji namen mreže je še vedno tako veljaven in pomemben, kot je bil na zaÏetku: to je, da bi pravice, ki jih državljanom in prebivalcem daje zakonodaja EU, postale realnost.
The implementation of EU law is largely the responsibility of administrations in the Member States.
Za izvajanje zakonodaje EU so veÏinoma zadolžene uprave v državah Ïlanicah.
In practice, therefore, respect for rights under EU law depends largely on the quality of their everyday work and on the extent to which supervisory bodies, including ombudsmen, succeed in promoting high quality administration and providing eTective remedies when needed.
V praksi je torej upoštevanje pravic iz zakonodaje EU precej odvisno od kakovosti njihovega vsakodnevnega dela in tega, kako uspešno nadzorni organi, vkljuÏno z varuhom Ïlovekovih pravic, spodbujajo visoko kakovostno upravo in zagotavljajo uÏinkovita pravna sredstva, kadar so potrebna.
This is becoming even more important in light of the fact that cooperation among the various Member States’ administrations and the EU institutions continues to grow in scope and intensity.
To postaja celo vse pomembnejše, saj je sodelovanje med razliÏnimi upravami držav Ïlanic in instituc`ami EU vedno obsežnejše in intenzivnejše. Za varstvo pravic in zagotavljanje uÏinkovitih pravnih sredstev morajo poleg uprav sodelovati tudi varuhi Ïlovekovih pravic.
In order to protect rights and provide eTective remedies, cooperation among administrations needs to be matched by cooperation among ombudsmen.
Dokazati moramo še, da je treba kljub raznolikosti, ki jo prinašajo vedno novi politiÏni dogodki, za katere redno skrb`o organi držav Ïlanic in instituc` e EU, varuhe Ïlovekovih pravic polno upoštevati.
As a contribution to establishing a clearer public identity for our co-operation, I announced that my oU ce plans to invest resources to further develop our use of the internet to communicate both with the public and amongst ourselves.
Najavil sem, da namerava moj urad v prizadevanju, da bi bolj poudaril javni znaÏaj našega sodelovanja, vložiti sredstva v še intenzivnejšo uporabo medmrežja za komuniciranje z javnostjo in naše medsebojno komuniciranje.
We plan to integrate a “Who can help me?” interactive guide into the European Ombudsman’s website to help direct citizens to the appropriate ombudsman, be it at the European, national, or regional level.
Na spletno stran evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic nameravamo vkljuÏiti interaktivni vodiÏ „Kdo mi lahko pomaga?“, ki bi lahko usmeril državljane na ustreznega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, bodisi na evropski, nacionalni ali regionalni ravni.
We will equally work towards developing, within the Network over the next two years, a statement that explains to citizens what they can expect if they turn to an ombudsman in the Network.
Znotraj mreže si bomo v naslednjih dveh letih prav tako prizadevali za pripravo izjave, ki bo državljanom pojasnila, kaj lahko priÏakujejo, Ïe se obrnejo na varuha Ïlovekovih pravic v mreži.
We could consider adopting the statement at the sixth seminar of national ombudsmen, which will take place in Strasbourg in 2007.
Izjavo bi lahko sprejeli na šestem seminarju nacionalnih varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic, ki bo potekal leta 2007 v Strasbourgu.
While I am fully aware of just how carefully such a statement would need to be draWed, I am persuaded that our shared common understanding of what an ombudsman should be and do is strong enough to make draWing it a realistic objective within the time-frame I have proposed.
Medtem ko se zavedam, kako skrbno je treba oblikovati takšno izjavo, sem prepriÏan, da je naše skupno razumevanje tega, kakšen bi moral biti varuh Ïlovekovih pravic in kaj bi moral delati, dovolj moÏno, da je lahko oblikovanje takšne izjave znotraj Ïasovnega okvira, ki sem ga predlagal, realen cilj.
Such a statement would be valuable not only to citizens who may need the services of an ombudsman outside their own Member State but would also provide a key point of reference in ombudsmen’s relations with policy-makers, both collectively and individually.
Takšna izjava ne bi bila koristna samo za državljane, ki bi lahko potrebovali storitve varuha Ïlovekovih pravic zunaj svoje države Ïlanice, ampak bi bila tudi kljuÏna referenÏna toÏka za odnose med varuhom Ïlovekovih pravic in nosilci politiÏnih odloÏitev, kolektivno in individualno.
The very process of draWing will surely also promote and deepen our possibilities for mutual learning and thus be valuable in itself.
Sam proces oblikovanja bo prav tako spodbujal in poglobil naše možnosti za medsebojno uÏenje in bo tako že sam po sebi dragocen.
Such an exercise can thus only strengthen the cooperation that has been developed to date.
S tem lahko tako samo okrepimo dosedanje sodelovanje.
The Ombudsman’s relations with citizens and potential complainants
Odnosi varuha Ïlovekovih pravic z državljani in možnimi pritožniki
The European Ombudsman’s eTorts to work closely with the EU institutions and bodies and with ombudsmen throughout the Union have one overriding objective, namely ensuring an optimal service to citizens.
Prizadevanja Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic za tesno sodelovanje z instituc`ami in organi EU ter z varuhi Ïlovekovih pravic po vsej Un`i imajo glavni cilj, in sicer zagotavljanje optimalnih storitev za državljane.
With a view to best serving citizens in the Union, we organised in 2005, as part of our tenth anniversary celebrations, events for the media, NGOs, interest groups, regional and local representation oUces, and citizens in general.
Za zagotavljanje najboljših storitev državljanom v Un`i smo leta 2005, v okviru praznovanja desete obletnice, organizirali dogodke za med`e, nevladne organizac`e, interesne skupine in lokalne predstavniške urade in državljane na splošno.
We felt it would be worthwhile to explore a number of themes likely to help us, in the years to come, to raise awareness about the right to complain to the Ombudsman with a view to improving the performance of the EU administration for the benefit of all.
Menili smo, da bi bilo vredno raziskati številne teme, ki bi nam lahko v prihodnjih letih pomagale dvigniti ozavešÏenost o pravici do pritožbe pri varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic in tako izboljšati uÏinkovitost upravljanja EU v korist vseh.
It was acknowledged that there is much room for improvement in terms of geming the right information out to the right people.
Spoznano je bilo, da obstaja še veliko možnosti za izboljšanje glede pošiljanja pravih informac`pravim ljudem.
The European Ombudsman has two immediate challenges in terms of raising awareness: many people do not know what an Ombudsman is and many people do not know what the EU does.
Evropski varuh Ïlovekovih pravic se pri dvigovanju ozavešÏenosti spopr`emlje z dvema izzivoma: mnogo ljudi ne ve, kaj je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic, in veliko jih ne ve, kaj dela EU.
Any information material that we produce must address these two issues in a clear and straightforward way.
Vse informativno gradivo, ki ga pripravimo, mora jasno in enostavno odgovoriti na ti dve vprašanji.
The Ombudsman must improve his internet presence.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic mora poveÏati svojo prisotnost na medmrežju.
We must target potential complainants bemer.
Bolje se je treba usmeriti na potencialne pritožnike.
EU institutions should systematically inform people they are in contact with about their right to complain.
Instituc` e EU morajo ljudi, s katerimi imajo stike, sistematiÏno obvešÏati o njihovi pravici do pritožbe.
The Ombudsman equally needs to get the message across that complaining is very straightforward.
Prav tako mora varuh Ïlovekovih pravic posredovati sporoÏilo, da je vlaganje pritožbe zelo enostavno.
Relatively speaking, the Ombudsman oT ers a fast service and one that is free and flexible.
Je posplošimo, varuh Ïlovekovih pravic ponuja hitro, brezplaÏno in prilagodljivo storitev.
For those who fear negative repercussions from the institutions if they complain, I will continue to make clear that any amempt to disadvantage, or threaten to disadvantage, a person for exercising the right to complain to the Ombudsman would itself be maladministration.
Vsem, ki se boj`o negativnega odziva instituc` , bom še naprej pojasnjeval, da je že vsak poskus škodovati oziroma vsak poskus grožnje s škodo osebi, ker je uresniÏila svojo pravico do pritožbe pri varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic, sam po sebi nepravilnost.
EU institutions and bodies should take the necessary steps to ensure that their oUcials are aware of this and act accordingly.
Instituc` e in organi EU morajo sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se bodo njihovi uradniki tega zavedali in ustrezno ravnali.
These are testing times for the European Union.
To je Ïas velikih preizkusov za Evropsko un`o.
Citizens in France and the Netherlands voted not to ratify the Constitution for Europe, voter turnout at European elections continues to decline, and the Union is still struggling to address the perception that it is a remote bureaucracy built by a political
Državljani Franc`e in Nizozemske so glasovali proti ratifi kac` i Ustave za Evropo, volilna udeležba na evropskih volitvah še naprej pada, Un`a pa se še vedno bori z mnenjem, da je odroÏna birokrac`a, ki jo sestavlja politiÏna elita. Zadnji Eurobarometer je pokazal, da se samo 38 % javnosti strinja s trditv`o „moj glas v EU šteje“.
The European Ombudsman was established to help bring the Union closer to citizens and to give the EU administration a “human face”.
Kot je napisal eden od pritožnikov, „Zame se je ta primer konÏno zakljuÏil in upam, da lahko v zvezi z mojimi dejavnostmi sedaj obrnem novo stran, saj so tesno povezane z Evropo.
I would like to thank you for your helpful mediation.
Rad bi se vam zahvalil za vaše uspešno posredovanje.
Your institution oT ers a very important recourse enabling citizens to resolve, in a friendly manner, sensitive problems they may face with the European institutions.”
Vaša instituc` a je zelo pomemben vir, ki državljanom omogoÏa, da sporazumno rešujejo obÏutljive težave, na katere nalet`o pri evropskih instituc`ah.“ ah.“
Ensuring a top-class administration is a task that must be tackled in tandem with the EU institutions and bodies.
Zagotavljanje vrhunske uprave je naloga, s katero se je treba spopasti skupaj z instituc`ami in organi EU.
Delivering on promises, providing proper redress mechanisms, learning from mistakes, working openly and allowing for public scrutiny — these are the all important means to building trust among citizens.
Izpolnjevanje obljub, zagotavljanje ustreznih mehanizmov za odškodnine, uÏenje iz napak, javno delovanje in omogoÏanje javnega nadzora – vse to so pomembni naÏini za gradnjo zaupanja med državljani.
Equally, the Ombudsman must work concertedly and systematically with his national, regional and local colleagues to ensure that citizens’ rights are fully respected throughout the Union.
Prav tako mora varuh Ïlovekovih pravic delovati skupaj in sistematiÏno s svojimi nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi kolegi, da se tako zagotovi polno spoštovanje državljanskih pravic po vsej Evropi.
Finally, he must continue to reach out to citizens and potential complainants so that they become aware of the service he provides.
Nenazadnje pa mora varuh Ïlovekovih pravic še naprej komunicirati z državljani in potencialnimi pritožniki, tako da bodo vedeli za njegove storitve.
As European Ombudsman, I will endeavour to build on the achievements of the first decade with a view to truly fulfilling my institutional mandate of bringing the Union closer to citizens and giving the EU administration a “human face”.
Kot Evropski varuh Ïlovekovih pravic bom gradil na dosežkih prvih desetih let, da bi tako resniÏno izpolnil svoje institucionalne pristojnosti v zvezi s približevanjem Un`e njenim državljanom in zagotavljanjem „Ïloveškega obraza“ uprave EU.
The eleventh Annual Report of the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament provides an account of the Ombudsman’s activities in 2005.
Enajsto letno poroÏilo Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu prinaša opis dejavnosti varuha Ïlovekovih pravic v letu 2005.
It is the third Annual Report to be presented by Mr P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS, who began work as European Ombudsman on 1 April 2003.
Gre za tretje letno poroÏilo P. Nikiforusa DIAMANDOUROSA, ki je delo evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic zaÏel opravljati 1. aprila 2003.
It starts with a personal introduction by the Ombudsman, in which he reviews the year’s main activities and achievements and outlines ideas for the years ahead.
ZaÏne se z uvodom, v katerem varuh Ïlovekovih pravic povzame osrednje letne dejavnosti in dosežke ter predstavi prednostne naloge v naslednjih letih.
This Executive Summary constitutes chapter 1.
Povzetek predstavlja poglavje 1.
Chapter 2 describes the Ombudsman’s procedures for handling complaints and conducting inquiries.
Poglavje 2 opisuje postopke varuha Ïlovekovih pravic za obravnavanje pritožb in izvajanje preiskav.
It highlights important new developments and gives an overview of the complaints dealt with during the year, including a thematic analysis of the results of cases closed a W er an inquiry.
Opisuje pomembnejše spremembe in vsebuje pregled pritožb, ki so bile obravnavane med letom, vkljuÏno s tematsko analizo rezultatov v primerih, ki so se zakljuÏili s preiskavo.
This analysis covers the most significant findings of law and fact contained in the Ombudsman’s decisions in 2005.
Analiza obsega najpomembnejše ugotovitve in dejstva iz sklepov varuha v letu 2004.
Chapter 3 consists of a selection of summaries of those decisions, illustrating the range of subjects and institutions involved in complaints and own-initiative inquiries.
V poglavju 3 so zbrani povzetki sklepov, ki ponazarjajo razpon podroÏ` in instituc` , vpletenih v pritožbe in preiskave na lastno pobudo.
It includes summaries of all the decisions mentioned in the thematic analysis of chapter 2.
Poglavje prinaša povzetke vseh sklepov, omenjenih v tematski analizi iz poglavja 2.
Summaries of decisions on complaints are organised first by the type of finding or outcome and then by the institution or body concerned.
Povzetki sklepov o pritožbah so najprej razvršÏeni glede na zakljuÏek oziroma rezultat, potem pa še glede na instituc` o ali organ.
Summaries of decisions following own-initiative inquiries are covered at the end of the chapter.
Poglavje se zakljuÏi s povzetki sklepov preiskav na lastno pobudo.
Chapter 5 deals with the European Ombudsman’s relations with the community of national, regional and local ombudsmen in Europe and beyond.
Poglavje 5 povzema odnose Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic z nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi varuhi Ïlovekovih pravic v Evropi in zunaj nje.
The activities of the European Network of Ombudsmen are described in detail, while the Ombudsman’s participation in seminars, conferences and meetings is also covered.
NatanÏno so opisane dejavnosti evropske mreže varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic, poleg tega pa je opisana tudi udeležba varuha na seminarjih, konferencah in sreÏanjih.
Chapter 6 provides an overview of the Ombudsman’s communications activities.
Poglavje 6 ponuja pregled dejavnosti s podroÏja obvešÏanja javnosti.
The chapter is divided into six sections, covering the year’s highlights, the Ombudsman’s information visits, conferences and meetings involving the Ombudsman and his staT, media relations, publications and online communications.
Razdeljeno je na šest delov, ki vkljuÏujejo najpomembnejše letne dogodke, informativne obiske varuha, konference in sreÏanja, na katerih je sodeloval varuh oziroma njegovi zaposleni, odnose z med`i, objave in spletne komunikac`e. e.
Annex A contains statistics on the work of the European Ombudsman in 2005.
Priloga A vsebuje statistiÏne podatke o delu evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic v letu 2005.
Annexes B and C give details of the Ombudsman’s budget and personnel respectively.
Prilogi B in C navajata podrobnosti v zvezi s proraÏunom in zaposlenimi v uradu varuha.
Annex D indexes the decisions contained in chapter 3 by case number, by subject mamer and by the type of maladministration alleged.
Priloga D navaja sklepe iz poglavja 3 glede na številko primera, vsebino in vrsto domnevne nepravilnosti.
Annex E describes the procedure for electing the European Ombudsman and gives an account of the reelection of Mr DIAMANDOUROS in January 2005.
Priloga E opisuje postopek izvolitve evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic in ponovno izvolitev g. DIAMANDOUROSA januarja 2005.
The mission of the European Ombudsman
Poslanstvo Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic
The oU ce of European Ombudsman was established by the Maastricht Treaty as part of the citizenship of the European Union.
Urad Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic je bil ustanovljen z Maastrichtsko pogodbo v okviru pravic iz državljanstva Evropske un`e.