natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The importance and the positive impact of this policy can be easily illustrated using passages from the above evaluations, for example:
Pomen in pozitivni učinek te politike je mogoče zlahka ponazoriti z nekaj odlomki iz samih poglavij navedenih ocen, na primer:
Generalreplyto Box 5Most ofthe programmestaken as examples by the Court of Auditors are programmes selected before 2005.
Odgovor na celoten okvir 5Večina programov, ki jih je Računsko sodišče v zvezi s tem navedlo kot primer, so programi, izbrani pred letom 2005.
These programmes have not therefore been subject to the vari-ousimprovements which were madetothe currentrules.7
Za te programe torej niso bile uporabljene različne izboljšave, uvedene v podrobnih pravilih za uporabo.7
The Commission detected these problems following analysis ofthereports submitted bythe Member States and acted immediately to resolve them, while at the same time respecting the principle of subsidiarity applicabletothis policy.8
Komisija je po analizi poročil, ki so jih poslale države članice, ugotovilaterazličnetežave in se takoj lotila njihovega reševanja, pri čemer je upoštevala načelo subsidiarnosti, kise uporablja zato politiko8.
’EU co-funding enables proposing organisations to conduct ambitious, large-scale programmes addressing a wide audience with expected high impact [...].
„Sofinanciranje EU omogoča organizacijam predlagateljicam, da obsežno izvajajo velikopotezne programe, namenjene široki javnosti, in hkrati predvidijo obsežne posledice teh programov […].
Without EUco-funding,somecampaigns wouldnot have been implemented’, and ‘EU co-funding produces multiplier effects, mainly by facilitating implementation of other campaigns and [...] by promoting cooperation between Member States at EUlevel’.9
Brez sofinanciranja EU se nekatere kampanje ne bi izvajale,“ in „Sofinanciranje EU ima pomnoževalne učinke predvsem tako, da olajšujeizvajanje ali druge kampanje in […] tako, da spodbuja sodelovanje meddržavamičlanicami na evropskiravni.“9
Moreover, the new provisions in the manual of procedures stipulate that greater attention must be paid from now on to the analysis of information received from the Member States.
Poleg tega bo v novih določbah priročnika o postopkih posebna pozornost namenjena analiziinformacij, prejetih od držav članic.
Example of anindicator not directly correspondingtothe aims set bythe programme The new provisions in the Commission’s manual of procedures stipulate that greater attention must be paidfrom now ontothe analysis of information received from the Member States.
Primer kazalnika, ki ne ustreza povsem ciljem, določenim v programu V novih določbah priročnika o postopkih Komisije bo odslej posebna pozornost namenjena analizi informacij, prejetih od držav članic.
Another passage states that: ‘As a consequence of these campaigns, the image (of the promoted products) has improved among opinionleadersandthe general public has been madefamiliar witha widerrangeof productsthan before’ and‘EU co-financing has been a clear incentive for professionals to join forces and for improving sector integration [...]. In particular, small producers felt encouraged to organise their own promotion campaigns outside their region of production.’10
V drugem odlomku piše: „Posledica teh kampanj je bilo izboljšanje podobe (promoviranih proizvodov) medoblikovalcijavnega mnenja in seznanjanje široke javnosti z večjo ponudbo proizvodov kot prej,“ in „[…] Sofinanciranje EU je bilo jasna spodbuda za združevanje strokovnjakov in izboljšanje povezovanjasektorja[…].Predvsem mali proizvajalci so se čutili opogumljene, da organizirajo promocijske kampanje zunaj svojeregije proizvodnje.“10
They also state that, without co-financing, the programmes either would nothavetakenplaceor wouldhavebeen muchsmaller.’11
biliše bolj okrnjeni“11
Fruit and vegetables sector, November 2007.
Sektor sadja in zelenjave, november 2007.
Organic products sector, November 2006.
Proizvodi ekološkega sektorja, november 2006.
Products Committee met on 2 October 2007, document AGRI/63454/2007 was distributed to all the Member States to help them to select programmes more efficiently and evaluate the effectiveness of the programmes they manage, check and co-finance.
proizvodov“, ki se je sestal 2. oktobra 2007, dokument AGRI/63454/2007 razdeljen vsem državam članicam kot pomoč za boljše izbiranje in ocenjevanje učinkovitosti programov, ki so jih države članice vodile, nadzirale in sofinancirale. V zvezi s tem se je treba sklicevati na točko 17 tega dokumenta.
The Commission proposed remedies to the criticism issued by the external evaluation firms as and when it received theirreports.
Službe Komisije so ob prejemu teh poročil predlagale rešitve za kritike, ki sojih izrazile družbe za zunanje ocenjevanje.
The Commission focused in particular on the methods usedto evaluatethe cost–impactratio based onthe evaluation of theinternal market programmes13.
Še več, pred samim začetkom revizije Računskega sodišča (4. april 2008) in pred koncem cikla zunanjih ocenjevalnih študij, ki jih je naročila Komisija (december 2008), so službe Komisije na podlagi zaključkov in priporočil v razpoložljivih ocenjevalnih študijah pripravile dokument AGRI/63454/2007vzvezi z vprašanji ocenjevanja.
Moreover,evenbeforethestartofthe Court of Auditors’ audit (on 4 April 2008) andbeforetheendofthecycleofthe external evaluation studies requested by the Commission (in December 2008), the Commission had already drawn up document AGRI/63454/2007 on mattersrelating to evaluation on the basis of the conclusions andrecommendations contained in the evalu ationstudies available.
Službe Komisije so posebno pozornost namenilevprašanju metodzaocenitev razmerjamedstroškiinopravljenim delomnapodlagioceneprogramovza notranjitrg13.
The monitoring system has been considerably improved and when it receives the annual reports for each programme, the Commission pays special attention to the Member States’ evaluation of the measuresintroduced.
Odgovor na okvir 6 – Podrobnosti smernic iz Uredbe (ES) št. 501/200812 glede sadja in zelenjave
Replyto Box 6—With regard to fruit and vegetables, the detailed guidelines in Regulation (EC) No 501/200812 show that the aims of the Communityinformationand promotion policy are much broader and more complex, and certainly go beyond simply quantifying consumption.
kažejo, da so cilji informacijske in promocijske politike Skupnosti dosti obse-žnejšiin bolj zapleteni ter da zanesljivo presegajo zgolj količinsko opredelitev porabe.
The ‘Food Dudes’ programme, which was awardedthe World Health Organisation prizein2006foritseffortstocombat childobesity,shouldbe mentionedas anobviousexampleofthemultiple, complexdimensionoftheco-financed programmes.
Kotočitenprimerteraznovrstnein zapletene razsežnosti sofinanciranih programovjetrebanavestiprogram „Food Dudes“, ki je leta 2006 prejel nagrado Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije za prizadevanje v boju proti otroški debelosti.
The guidelines in Regulation (EC) No 501/2008 state that
Smernice iz Uredbe (ES) št. 501/2008 določajo, da
Nevertheless, the Commission’s rigorous application of the regulation14 considerably limits the risk of this type of programme being selected bythe Commission.
Vendar strogost, s katero službe Komisije uporabljajo Uredbo 14, močno zmanjšuje tveganje, da bi Komisija lahko izbrala take programe.
the main aims of the information programmes cofinanced in the fruit and vegetable sector are ‘to improve the image of the products as being “fresh” and “natural”, encourage their regular consumption and bring down the average age of consumers.
so glavni cilji sofinanciranih informacijskih programov v sektorju svežega sadja in zelenjave „izboljšati podobo proizvodov kot ,svežih‘ in ,naravnih‘ ter spodbuditi njihovo redno uživanje in znižati povprečno starost potrošnikov.
The latter may be attained by encouraging young people, and in particular children and adolescents in educational establishments, to consume the products concerned’.
Slednji cilj je mogoče doseči s spodbujanjem mladih, zlasti otrok in mladostnikov v šolah, k uživanju teh proizvodov“.
Dated 15 February 2009.
Z dne 15. februarja 2009.
As for processed fruit and vegetables, the guidelines in Regulation (EC) No 501/2008 state that the main objectives of the cofinanced information programmes are to modernise ‘the image of the product’ and make it more youthful, ‘giving the information needed to encourage consumption’.
Za predelano sadje in zelenjavo pa smernice iz Uredbe (ES) št. 501/2008 določajo, da so glavni cilji sofinanciranih informacijskih programov „posodobiti in pomladiti [podobo proizvoda] ob zagotavljanju informacij, ki so potrebne za spodbujanje porabe“.
The Commission is makinganefforttoget Member States to raise their standards in terms of evaluation and selection of programme proposals.
Komisija si prizadeva, da bi države članice povišale raven zahtev pri ocenjevanju in izboru predlogov programov.
Replyto Box 8 as a whole Some of the programmes not carried through to the end complied perfectly with the selection criteria defined by the various Member States when they communicated the programmes to the Commission.
Odgovor na celoten okvir 8 Nekateri programi, ki niso bili zaključeni, so ob predložitvi Komisiji v celoti izpolnjevali izbirna merila,kisojih določile države članice.
Based on the documents sent by the Member States —in particulartheidentificationsheet —the Commission did notfindsufficientreasons forrejectingthese programmes, bearingin mindtherules applicable.
Komisija v dokumentaciji, ki so jo poslale države članice – in zlasti v obrazcu s podatki –, ni našla zadostnih razlogov za zavrnitev navedenih programov ob upoštevanju veljavnih predpisov.
The Court refers to document AGRI/63454/2007of2 October2007.Since then, programmes have been evaluated on the basis of the criteria set out in this document, among otherthings.
Računsko sodišče se sklicuje na dokument AGRI/63454/2007 z dne 2. oktobra 2007. Od takrat so bili programi med drugim ocenjeni na podlagi meril, navedenih v tem dokumentu.
Some of the problems raised by the Court concernunforeseenproblems whichcould not have been anticipated when the Member States selected the programmes or when the Commission approvedthem.
Nekatere težave, ki jih je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče, se nanašajo natežave, kijih ni bilo mogoče predvideti ob izboru programov v državah članicah ali v času, ko jih je Komisija odobrila.
However,it mustbestressedthat mostof the Court’s commentsreferto programmes that have already ended.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da se večina ugotovitev Računskega sodišča nanaša na že končane programe.
The current average rate of completion of programmes since thestart ofthe measureis 85 %.
Zdaj je povprečna stopnja izvajanja programov 85 %odzačetka izvajanja ukrepa.
As already stated in point 18, document AGRI/63454/2007, drawn upby the Commission on the basis of the findings in the external evaluation reports, covers coherence between the implemented measures and the objectives of the regulation, actions and information channels used and their cost-effectiveness, coverage and content of the programmes, impact and effectiveness of the measures,andcomplementari-ties between programmes submitted by the Member States and programmessubmitted by professional organisations.
Kot je bilo navedeno že v točki 18, dokument AGRI/63454/2007, ki ga je Komisija pripravila na podlagi rezultatov zunanjih ocenjevalnih študij,pokrivausklajenost medizvedenimi ukrepi in cilji Uredbe, ukrepe in uporabljene informacijske kanale ter njihovo donosnost, obseg in vsebino programov, posledice in učinkovitost ukrepov ter dopolnjevanje med programi držav članic in programi, ki jih pre-dložijotrgovinske organizacije.
This process entered into force in 2009 when the Commission selected the internal market programmes; the programmes preselected by Member States were sent to the Commission on 15 February 2009.
Ta proces se je začel uporabljati za leto 2009, od takrat, koje Komisija opravilaizbor programov za notranji trg, za katerega so države članice predizbrane programe poslale Komisiji 15.februarja 2009.
Thisincreaseintherate ofimplementation is due mainly to the new provisions and tools introduced by the Commission to monitor programmes from June 2006 on, in particular the IT monitoring programme MPP (management promotion programme) and the standard forms given to Member States to ensure regu larcommunicationofthe measuresto beimplemented andtherelated payments.
To zvišanje odstotka izvajanja je predvsem posledica novih določb in orodij, ki jih je Komisija uvedla za spremljanje programov od junija 2006, zlasti računalniškega programa za spremljanje MPP (Management Promotion Programme) ter vzorcev, poslanih državam članicam za redno obveščanje o ukrepih, ki jih je treba izvesti, in z njimi povezanih plačil.
Since 7 November 2008, the Commission has developed a uniform evaluation grid15, form- ing part of the manual of procedures.
34.Službe Komisije so 5. septembra 2006 temeljito preverile vse programe, ki so se izvajali nata dan.
Using this grid, the Commission is able to evaluate allthe programmes objectively.
Komisijajetakolahko ugotovila, da veliko programov ni bilo zaključenih.
(b)As acknowledged by the Court, new instructions concerning the follow-up to problems identified and any replies received by the Member States became the formal procedure followingthe audit of 2 October 2008.
(b)Kot priznava Računsko sodišče, so bila nova navodila v zvezi s spremljanjem ugotovljenih težav in odgovorov, ki bi jih lahko prejele državečlanice, dokončana porevizijiz dne 2. oktobra 2008.
The Commission considersthatitsrigorous selection procedures for the programmes limittheriskthata weaknessinchecking the selection of implementing bodies is likelytohaveaneffecton whether the cofinanced programme is regular, effective and economic.
Komisija meni,dastrogost,skateronjene službeizbirajo programe, zmanjšuje tveganje, da bi kakršna koli pomanjkljivost nadzora nadizboromizvajalskih organovlahko ogrozila pravilnost in/ali učinkovitost ter gospodarnostsofinanciranih programov.
There is still some room for improvement as regards defining and implementing the promotion programmes16.
Izboljšanje opredelitve in izvajanja promocijskih programov ostaja mogoče16.
In the specific case of implementing bodies chosen after the adoption of the Commission’s decision, points 1.4 and 2 of the manual of procedures nowapplicable have reinforced the monitoring of the implementing body selection procedure since Member States must forward to the Commission all documents concerningthis procedure.
Za posebni primer izvajalskih organov, izbranih posprejetju odločitve Komisije,je vtočkah 1.4in 2 zdaj veljavnega priročnika o postopkih določena okrepitev nadzora nad izborom izvajalskih organov, saj bodo morale države članice Komisiji poslati v so dokumentacijo v zvezi s postopkom izbora izbranihizvajalskih organov.
The effectiveness of the information and promotion programmes has been evaluated on the basis of the new evaluation grid since 15 February 2009.
Informacijskiin promocijski programi se od 15. februarja 2009 ocenjujejo na podlagi njihove učinkovitosti, ki se preverja na podlagi novelestvice ocenjevanja.
43.–44.Whenthe Commissionisselectingthe programmes, it checks that the implementing bodies were subjected to competitive tendering procedures.
43.in 44.Natečajni postopek za izbor izvajalskih organov se preveri, ko službe Komisije izberejo programe.
Thisis one of the points onthe checklistfor officials entrusted with checkingthe eligibility of proposals.
To je točka na kontrolnem listu uradnikov, zadolženih za preverjanje, da poslani predlogiizpolnjujejo pogoje.
The Commission is aware of the shortcomings mentionedintheevaluationreports.
Službe Komisije vedo za pomanjkljivosti, navedene v ocenjevalnih študijah.
Internaldiscussionsareunderwayto improve the implementation of programmes in terms of the synergies and complementarity of promotion measures,andalsoin relation to other problems raised by the external auditors.
Potekajo notranjerazprave, da biseizboljšala opredelitev in izvajanje programov, kar zadeva sinergije in dopolnjevanje promocijskih ukrepov, pa tudi odpravile druge težave, na katereso opozorili zunanji ocenjevalci.
41.Member States are responsible for approving and monitoring the selection of the implementing body17.
Komisija je naložila finančni popravek državam članicam, v katerih je bilo ugotovljeno neupoštevanjeteh določb.
Document AGRI/63454/2007 has come into force.
Dokument AGRI/63454/2007 je začel veljati.
Recital 8 and Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 501/2008.
Uvodna izjava 8 in člen 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 501/2008.
47.–52.The Commission initiated investigations in 2007 and 2008 following the significant corrections imposed on Spain and Italy after the 2005 investigations.
47.–52.Komisija je leta 2007 in leta 2008 začela preiskave za spremljanje zaradi velikih popravkov, ki so bili naloženi Španiji in Italiji po preiskavah leta 2005.
Italy has again been subjectedto arisk analysis bythe Commission, and athirdinvestigation(on-the-spot inspection)is scheduledfor 200919 to cover expenditure in 2008 and 2009, and subsequent yearsif necessary.
Italija je znova predmet analize tveganja, ki jo opravlja Komisija, tretja preiskava(misija nakrajusamem) pa je predvidena za leto 200919 in bo pokrila odhodke, izvedene v letih 2008 in 2009 ter tudi pozneje, če bo potrebno.
Forthesetwo Member States, allthefinan-cial years covered by the measure since 2003 and their decentralised management to date are audited bythe Commission.
Komisija za ti državi članici revidira vsa proračunska leta od leta 2003, v katerih se je ukrep izvajal, in kako ti državi zdaj decentralizirano voditata ukrep.
46. and boxes Without prejudice to the correct application of the principle of subsidiarity, the Commission attaches particular attention to the messagesusedinordertostrikeafair balance between the information and commercial aspects ofthe promotion campaigns.
46.in okviri Ne da bi to vplivalo na pravilno uporabo načela subsidiarnosti, službe Komisije namenjajo posebno pozornostizbirisporočil, da bisezagotoviloprimernoravnovesje med informacijskimi in komercialnimi konotacijami promocijskih kampanj.
Duringthese ongoing audits for Italy20 and
Komisija je na podlagi teh revizij za spremljanje, ki jih opravlja v zvezi z Italijo20 in
The selection procedure applied18 by the Commission ensures uniform, impartial treatment of allthe programmes.
Izbirni postopek,ki ga uporabljajo18službe Komisije, zagotavlja enotno in nepristransko obravnavanje vseh programov.
Spain21,the Commissionaskedthese Member States to communicate the corrective measures adopted, the inspection structures and the instructions given to the relevant inspection bodies.
Španijo21,odtehdržavčlanic meddrugim zahtevala, naj ji sporočita sprejete popravne ukrepe, strukturo nadzorov in navodila, ki sta jih poslali udeleženim nadzornim organom.
The existence and impact of the changes announced by these Member States are currently being analysed as part of the current investigations for the clearance of accounts.
Resničnost in učinek sprememb, ki sta jih napovedaliti državi članici,sezdaj analizirata na podlagi preiskav za spremljanje, ki se opravljajo zaradi potrditve obračuna.
During its investigations, the Commission identifiedfailurestocomply withthepro-visions on product promotion andinforma-tion in relation to the intrinsic quality of the products concerned or their characteristics.
Komisija je med preiskavami ugotovila neupoštevanje določb o promociji proizvodov in informiranju o teh proizvodih glede na resničnelastnosti ali značilnosti zadevnega proizvoda.
In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Member States mustensurethatthe criteria approved by the Commission regarding promotional messages are satisfied.
Države članice morajo na podlagi načela subsidiarnosti zagotavljati upoštevanje določb o skladnosti promocijskega sporočila, kot ga odobri Komisija.
The Commission has imposed a financial correction on Member States which have been found notto comply withthese provisions.
Komisija je naložila finančni popravek državam članicam, v katerihje bilo ugotovljeno neupo-števanjeteh določb.
In addition to the corrections, the Commission has made recommendations to these Member States to step up their key inspectionsandtoremedy weaknessesin subcontracting.
Komisija je poleg naloženih popravkov tema državama članicama priporočila, naj okrepita ključne nadzore in odpravita pomanjkljivosti podizvajanja.
Appointment of a first and second reader for each programme, examination of all programmes by an evaluation committee and participation of external experts in the selection process.
Za vsak program se imenuje prvi in drugi bralec, vse programe prouči ocenjevalni odbor, v izbirnem postopku pa sodelujejo od Komisije neodvisni strokovnjaki.
Even though the Commission agrees with the Court that France’s practices were much moreinkeeping withexpectedpractice,it nevertheless points out thatit sent a series of recommendations to France to have them improved.
Čeprav se Komisija strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da so bile prakse Francije dosti bolj skladne, vseeno poudarja, da ji je poslala vrsto priporočil za njihovoizboljšanje.
The Court’s comments will also be taken into accountforthe clearance of accounts.
Opažanja Računskega sodišča se bodo upo-števalatudi pri potrditvi obračuna.
Moreover, Annex I to the Commission Regulation 22 sets specific objectives for each of
Polegtega so v Prilogi I k Uredbi Komisije22
The information and promotioncampaigns whichitco-finances may take place either in the EU internal market orin non-EU countries.
Sofinancirane promocijske in informacijske kampanje se lahko izvajajo na notranjemtrgu EU ali vtretjih državah.
the various products concerned.
razviti posebni cilji za vsakega od različnih zadevnih proizvodov.
These goals are accompanied by an overview of the situation whichledtothe organisation of pro-motionandinformation measuresforthe productin question,thetarget groups,the main messages,the mainchannelsandthe duration and scope of the programmes. The discussions whicharenowtakingplaceat the Commission will enable further improve-mentsto be madeinthisrespect.
Te cilje spremlja splošna analiza stanja, ki je bila razlog za vzpostavitev promocijskih in informacijskih ukrepov za zadevni proizvod, ciljne skupine, glavna sporočila, glavne instrumente ter trajanje in obseg programov.
Conclusions and operational recommendations have already beenidentified.
Razprava, ki poteka v Komisiji, bo omogočila naknadne izboljšave vtejsmeri.
(b)The four objectives set out in Council Regu-lation(EC) No3/2008andthosesetoutin Commission Regulation (EC) No 501/2008 are considered by the Commission as ‘SMART’ objectives whichshouldbepursuedinall ofthe programmes.
(b)Štirje ciljiiz Uredbe Sveta(ES) št. 3/2008in ciljiiz Uredbe Komisije(ES)št. 501/2008so cilji, ki jih Komisija šteje za „SMART“ in jih je treba upoštevati v vseh programih.
The eight studies to evaluate the information and promotion programmes and the two accompanying summariesrequested bythe Commission highlighted the positive impact of the promotion programmes for the four specific strategy objectives set out in the regulations.
Komisija je v prid urejenemu finančnemu poslovodenju in v prizadevanju za nadaljnje izboljšanje izvajanja te politike v letih 2006–2008 naročila skupno osem zunanjih ocenjevalnih študij, s katerimi je bilo mogoče dokazati pomen in pozitivne učinke mehanizma (glej točko 28).
As regards the modest budget, it should be remembered that it is intended only to supplement and reinforce schemes run bythe Member States.
Iz teh študij je že dobila operativne zaključkein priporočila.
Document AGRI/63454/2007, drawn upby the Commission on the basis of the findings in the external evaluation reports, covers five main themes.
Dokument AGRI/63454/2007, ki gaje Komisija pripravila na podlagi rezultatov zunanjih ocenjevalnih študij, pokriva pet glavnih tem.