natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
An exception has been OLAF, which has notified a significant amount of cases and continues to do so.
Institucije in organi so pripravljeni upoštevati ta priporočila in doslej sklepi o izvršbi niso bili potrebni. Čas za izvedbo teh ukrepov se od primera do primera razlikuje.
Others have increased numbers in early 2007. e priority areas are not yet covered in all institutions and bodies, so efforts have to continue to meet the deadline.
S tem naj bi zadevne institucije oziroma organe spodbudili, da bi ti na lastno pobudo začeli z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem, kar se že dogaja.
During 2006, and regarding the followup which could also concern opinions issued in 2005, 83 cases (among 137 notifications received between 2004 and 2006 and which represents 60.6 % of the cases) have been treated with the following repartition:
Leta 2006 je bilo obravnavanih 83 primerov (izmed 137 uradnih obvestil, prejetih med leti 2004 in 2006, predstavljajo pa 60,6 % primerov) v zvezi z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem, tudi glede mnenj, objavljenih leta 2005; razporediti bi jih bilo mogoče takole:
But not only priority matters have to receive attention. All ex post cases have to be notified, as they are also covered by Article 27 of the regulation and thus present specific risks for the rights and freedoms of data subjects.
Primer „elektronsko glasovanje – volitve v odbor uslužbencev“ Komisije je predstavljal priložnost, da se poudari, da predhodno preverjanje ni nujno za vse občutljive podatke (samo tiste iz člena 27(2)(a)), ter da tudi morebitne okvare sistema niso zadosten razlog za predhodno preverjanje.
Closed cases
Zaključeni primeri
17 cases17 cases
17 primerov
Cases for which the followup has been launched but with no reply of the institution
Nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi z mnenji o predhodnem preverjanju in posvetovanji
34 cases
Primeri, pri katerih se je nadaljnje ukrepanje 34 primerovzačelo in je v teku in/ali dobro napreduje
Cases for which the followup has been launched and is under process and/or well advanced
Posebno nadaljnje ukrepanje v primerih, pri katerih ni potrebe po predhodnem preverjanju
Cases for which the followup has not yet been started as the opinions are quite recent (since October 2006)
Letno poročilo 2006
A special area which deserved attention during 2006 will continue to do so in 2007: the interinstitutional cases subject to prior checking.
Na primere, pri katerih je nadaljnje ukrepanje v teku in/ali dobro napreduje (34 primerov), pa se nanaša 256 njegovih priporočil.
In many cases, several institutions or bodies share processing operations in the fields of medical data, evaluation, promotion, etc. e respective roles differ from one case to another (one institution providing services to others, several bodies taking charge of partial aspects, etc), but all of them share the common feature of being complex. is will be given much attention in 2007.
Na tem prednostnem področju je pri naknadnih primerih prišlo do določenih zamud, saj je bilo treba pred tem dokončno zaključiti študijo, na podlagi katere je bil pripravljen dokument o elektronskem spremljanju (glej odstavek 2.8.). ENVP bi moral v letu 2007 preveriti vse postopke obdelave v institucijah in organih, katerih cilj je spremljanje pravilne uporabe telekomunikacijskih sistemov.
Specific followup of cases not subject to prior checking
V ta namen bo potekala akcija, s katero naj bi še enkrat opozorili na to zakonsko obveznost.
Annual Report 2006
Leto 2006 je bilo – kakor dokazuje navedena analiza obsega in kakovosti – zelo dejavno.
Electronic communications also will receive special attention.
Pričakovanja glede prejetih primerov so bila za drugo polletje leta 2006 večja.
Ex post cases in this priority area have been somewhat delayed due to the need to finalise the study leading to the emonitoring paper (see paragraph 2.8.).
Izjema pri tem je bil OLAF, ki je poslal uradna obvestila o znatnem številu primerov in jih še vedno pošilja.
All the processing operations done by institutions and bodies aiming at the monitoring of the proper use of telecommunication systems should by checked by the EDPS during 2007.
Pri drugih se je število primerov povečalo v začetku leta 2007. Prednostna področja še vedno niso popolnoma krita v vseh institucijah in organih, zato si je treba še naprej prizadevati za spoštovanje roka.
As we will see below, a number of complaints filed to the EDPS were declared inadmissible because they were outside the area of competence of the EDPS.
) Glede na člen 32(2) „lahko vsak posameznik, na katerega se nanašajo
e delays in providing information requested to complete the prior checking notification have also to be improved. ere are too many cases still pending, some many months old.
Veliko institucij oziroma organov postopke obdelave na področju zdravstvenih podatkov, ocenjevanja, napredovanja itd. v mnogih primerih izvaja skupaj.
e year 2007 must also be one in which all agencies and bodies have a DPO.
Temu bo v letu 2007 namenjene veliko pozornosti.
To that effect a campaign will be launched to remind, once again, of this legal obligation.
osebni podatki, vloži pritožbo pri evropskem nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov, če meni, da so bile kršene njegove pravice iz člena 286 Pogodbe kot posledica obdelave njegovih osebnih podatkov v instituciji ali organu Skupnosti“.
Whenever the EDPS receives a complaint, he sends an acknowledgement of receipt to the complainant without prejudice to the admissibility of the case, unless the complaint is clearly inadmissible without need for further examination. e EDPS will also request that the complainant inform him on other possible actions before a national court, the European Court of Justice or before the Ombudsman (whether pending or not).
Letno poročilo 2006 institucija oziroma organ sprejeti ukrepe, ENVP pri nadaljnjem ukrepanju sodeluje z zadevno institucijo oziroma organom.
After spring, a new approach will be started in parallel with the ongoing work on prior checks.
Od teh 52 jih je le 10 sprejel v postopek in nadalje raziskal. Na kratko so opisane spodaj.
Inspections will begin, including on-the-spot inspections if necessary. e aim will be to make sure that the process of notifications has included all cases under Article 27, as well as compliance with the regulation in other cases of personal data processing.
postopek sprejmejo le, če jih predložijo fizične osebe in zadevajo kršitev načela varstva podatkov s strani institucije ali organa EU pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v okviru opravljanja dejavnosti, ki v celoti ali deloma sodijo v področje uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti.
If the case is admissible, the EDPS will proceed to inquire about the case, notably by contacting the institution/body concerned or by requesting further information from the complainant. e EDPS has the power to obtain from the controller or the institution/body access to all personal data and to all information necessary for the inquiry and obtain access to any premises in which a controller or institution/body carries on its activities.
Če je pritožba sprejemljiva, ENVP začne primer preiskovati in pri tem stopi v stik z zadevno institucijo ali organom oziroma od pritožnika zahteva nadaljnje informacije. ENVP je pooblaščen, da od upravljavca ali institucije oziroma organa pridobi dostop do vseh osebnih podatkov in vseh informacij, ki jih potrebuje za preiskavo, ter da pridobi dostop do vseh prostorov, v katerih upravljavec ali institucija oziroma organ izvaja svoje dejavnosti.
As will be seen below, the EDPS has made use of these powers when handling complaints in 2006.
V nadaljevanju bo prikazano, da je ENVP to pooblastilo izkoristil za obravnavo pritožb v letu 2006.
Introduction
Sodišče (24
Part of this monitoring is carried out by the handling of complaints as provided for in Article 46(a) (22).
Zato je bilo priporočeno, naj se obrazec ustrezno popravi, in Evropski parlament je to tudi storil.
Any natural person may lodge a complaint to the EDPS with no conditions of nationality or place
Letno poročilo 2006 domačih naslovov lobistov ogrozila njihovo zasebnost.
22) According to Article 46(a) the EDPS shall ‘hear and investigate com-
25 pri zbiranju podatkov lobisti o tem obveščeni(
( plaints, and inform the data subject of the outcome within a reasonable period’.
Dostop do zdravniških izvidov in prenos zdravstvenih podatkov žnika obvestil o tej odločitvi.
(23) According to Article 32(2) ‘every data subject may lodge a complaint to the EDPS if he or she considers that his or her rights under Article 286 of the Treaty have been infringed as a result of the processing of his or her personal data by a Community institution or body’.
Nekdanji uradnik ES je zoper Urad za vodenje in plačevanje posameznih pravic (PMO – Paymaster Office) podal pritožbo glede dveh vidikov, ki po njegovem mnenju nista bila v skladu z Uredbo (št. 2006-120 in 390). Eden se je nanašal na pravico do dostopa do zdravniškega izvida.
Article 33: ‘Any person employed with a Community institution or body may lodge a complaint with the EDPS regarding an alleged breach of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, without acting through official channels.’(24) See Article 47(1) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Podana je bila tudi zahteva po pregledu te druge odločitve; trenutno je v pripravi. Pojavila so se tudi nekatera druga vprašanja glede dostopa do dokumentov v okviru Uredbe (ES) št.1049/2001.
29 kg703914inside.indd 29
Pritožba glede preiskave
Should the decision involve the adoption of measures by the institution/body, the EDPS follows this up with the institution/body concerned.
Pritožnik je ugovarjal tudi kratkemu prikazu njegovega primera v letnem poročilu, češ da je bil netočen in prenagljen. ENVP je pritožbo zavrnil.
Fifty-two complaints were received by the EDPS in 2006.
Letno poročilo 2006
A complaint was made against the European Parliament (2006-95) concerning the possible publication of the home addresses of accredited lobbyists. e application form for a lobbyist badge implied that it was compulsory to fi ll in the home address.
Trije primeri so zadevali obdelavo osebnih podatkov osebja ES, čeprav bistvo pritožb ni bila obdelava s strani institucije ali organa. Nanašale so se namreč na službe uprave EU, ki se morajo ravnati po Uredbi (ES) št. 45/2001, domnevne zadevne kršitve varstva podatkov pa so bile v zvezi z obdelavo na nacionalni ravni.
Further on in the form, it was mentioned that the information that followed would not be made public, thereby implying that previous information — including the private home address — would be published.
V enem primeru je šlo za pritožbo člana osebja, da je na svoj službeni naslov od politične stranke prejel gradivo političnega značaja v zvezi z volitvami v državi članici, od koder prihaja.
The number of surveillance cameras has increased during recent years.
Pri tem ni bilo mogoče izključiti na vprašanja v zvezi z varstvom podatkov.
e EDPS found that no other information than the name of the lobbyist and the organisation that he/she represents was made public.
možnosti, da je stalnemu predstavništvu države članice službeni naslov posredovala institucija.
A recommendation to amend the application form to reflect the practice was therefore made, and the European Parliament updated their form accordingly. e EDPS also stated that publishing the private home addresses of lobbyists would undermine their privacy.
Toda pritožba je zadevala politično stranko, ki je to informacijo uporabila v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo. Podatki za navezavo stikov z nacionalnimi organi za varstvo podatkov so se zato posredovali, obenem pa tudi pojasnilo, zakaj ENVP za zadevni primer ni pristojen.
However, more information could be made public, as long as the lobbyists would be informed of it when
Evropski varuh in ENVP sta novembra 2006 podpisala memorandum o soglasju, da bi se s tem izognili nepotrebnemu podvajanju in v največji možni meri zagotovili dosledno obravnavo splošnih in posebnih vprašanj o varstvu podatkov v pritožbah.
of professional sickness, early retirement, etc.
Glede na veliko število nesprejemljivih pritožb, zlasti v zvezi z zadevami na nacionalni ravni, je sedaj na novem spletnem mestu obseg pristojnosti ENVP pojasnjen veliko bolj natančno.
In any case, the processing of medical data by the PMO has to be submitted for prior checking. e revision of this second decision has also been asked and is currently pending.
Izkazalo se je, da ta tematika zadeva tudi peticije v zvezi z varstvom podatkov, naslovljene na Evropski parlament, in glede katerih je ENVP občasno zaprošen za pripombe ali mnenje.
A former official of the EC made a complaint against the PMO (Pay Master Office) on two aspects which he felt were not complying with the regulation (2006120 and 390).
ENVP je nadaljeval s pripravo internega priročnika za osebje ENVP na temo obravnave pritožb.
One concerned the right of access to a medical report. e EDPS, after revision of the initial
Na spletnem mestu bodo kmalu na voljo glavni elementi postopka in vzorčni obrazec za vložitev pritožb, skupaj z informacijami o njihovi sprejemljivosti.
A complaint was made against the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (2006-181 and 287) concerning the initial phase of the investigation requested by an official on unauthorised access to his
Pomočnik nadzornika in eden od članov osebja ENVP sta se udeležila delavnice nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov o obravnavi primerov, ki je marca
Access to an investigation report email account (alleged use of his user-id and password) and the subsequent failure of the HR director to provide access to the complainant’s log files in order to prove this unauthorised access.
2006 potekala v Madridu. V okviru tedelavnice je pomočnik nadzornika predstavil predhodno preverjanje s strani ENVP.
Following the request of intervention made by the complainant to the DPO of the EESC, the access to and analysis of the complainant’s own log files provided indicia of unauthorised access to the complainant email boxes.
Podobne delavnice so se trije drugi člani osebja udeležili tudi oktobra 2006 v Atenah, in tam predstavili preiskavo o videonadzoru, ki jo je opravil ENVP.
In his decision on this case, the EDPS concluded that it was regrettable that, until the introduction of a formal complaint by the complainant and the intervention of the Committee’s DPO, the Committee’s administration, due to the misunderstanding referred to above and lack of adequate technical and legal analysis, failed to come to a satisfactory conclusion regarding the request of the complainant.
ENVP je leta 2006 začel s poizvedbo o prenosu bančnih podatkov evropskih državljanov oblastem ZDA prek Združenja za svetovne finančne telekomunikacije med bankami (SWIFT – Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) (2006-357).
A complaint was made against the Court of Auditors concerning a person’s right of access under Article 13 to an investigation report (2006-239). is report concerned an alleged case of harassment and bad management following an Article 90 complaint under the Staff Regulations.
ENVP je leta 2006 opravil vrsto poizvedb na različnih področjih, od katerih si nekatere v tem poročilu zaslužijo posebno omembo.
An EU citizen launched a complaint against the European Parliament (EP) concerning its videosurveillance practices (2006-185). e complainant challenged the proportionality of surveillance outside EP buildings in Brussels.
Glede na pismo, ki ga je poslal organ za varstvo podatkov iz ene od držav članic, je bila opravljena predhodna poizvedba v zvezi z obsežno poizvedbo Evropske komisiji v sektorju za električno energijo (št. 2005-207).
He also claimed that the notice provided to the public was insufficient.
Oktobra je ENVP na srečanju v Frankfurtu predsedniku Evropske centralne banke posredoval nadaljnje informacije o napredku pri poizvedbi ENVP, slednji pa mu je dodatno pojasnil vlogo ECB.
In its decision, the EDPS required the EP to improve the notice provided to the public and to adjust the positioning of the surveillance cameras. e main focus of the EDPS was to ensure that demonstrators are not monitored by the EP, either purposefully, or incidentally, as this could have an inhibiting effect on free speech.
Po prejemu dodatne ustrezne dokumentacije in dejanskih informacij od SWIFT in ECB je ENVP decembra ECB poslal osnutek mnenja, da bi slednja lahko podala pripombe.
During the followup to his opinion, the EDPS continued to work with the EP to improve its videosurveillance practices taking into account the special security needs of the EP, including securing visits of Heads of States or other VIPs requiring increased protection, which were not addressed in the initial EDPS decision.
Omenjeni organ za varstvo podatkov je v pismu menil, da so se v okviru poizvedbe Komisije v sektorju nezakonito zbirali osebni podatki, zato je ENVP opravil predhodno poizvedbo; zahteval je navedene vprašalnike in jih analiziral, opravil obisk na kraju samem in se srečal z osebjem Generalnega direktorata za konkurenco, da bi tako pojasnil nekatere vidike obdelave informacij pri poizvedovanju, ki ga je izvedla Komisija.
A complaint was introduced against the Director-ate-General for Personnel and Administration of the European Commission claiming a right of access under Article 13 to certain documents concerning the complainant and the right to rectify certain data under Article 14 (2006-266). e complaint also invoked Article 18 to object to the processing of the complainant’s data.
ENVP je na podlagi prvih ugotovitev od generalnega direktorata zahteval, naj zagotovi, da se v okviru poizvedbe Komisije osebni podatki ne bodo obdelovali, ter v ta namen priporočil posebne ukrepe. GD za konkurenco je novembra 2006 predstavil poročilo o izvajanju vrste dejavnosti v skladu s priporočili ENVP, vključno s podrobnimi pregledi zbranih podatkov ter zagotavljanjem posebnih informacij za osebje direktorata.
After further requests for clarification of the situation, the EDPS concluded that the administration had provided access to all the documents required to the exception of one email for which the administration did not detain enough information to identify the document.
ENVP se je na podlagi tega poročila prepričal, da se v okviru poizvedbe Komisije v sektorju električne energije osebni podatki niso in se ne bodo obdelovali, in zato v tem primeru sklenil zaključiti s predhodno poizvedbo.
As concerns the exercise of the right of rectification, the EDPS reiterated his position that the right of rectification cannot be applied to subjective data on grounds of inaccuracy.
ENVP bo v letu 2007 pozorno spremljal razvoj tega primera, da se zagotovi popolna skladnost plačilnih postopkov institucij Skupnosti z Uredbo o varstvu podatkov.
Finally, as concerns the possibility of objecting to the processing on the basis of Article 18 of the regulation, the EDPS considered that the complainant failed to invoke ‘compelling legitimate grounds’.
Gledano širše pa bo ENVP v sodelovanju z drugimi nacionalnimi organi, pristojnimi za varstvo podatkov, še naprej opravljal svetovalno vlogo; na ta način naj bi zagotovili, da arhitektura evropskih plačilnih sistemov ne bo posegala v zasebnost strank bank EU.
Right of rectification and blocking rejected the complaint. is aspect is now also before the European Ombudsman.
Druge poizvedbe poseben problem hrambe podatkov o disciplinskih ukrepih; pripravljenih je bilo nekaj osnutkov predlogov za izboljšanje splošne prakse.
One complaint (2006-436) concerned the right to rec-tifi cation without delay of incomplete data (Article 14) of the career history (historique de carrière) in Sysper2 (information system of the European Commission in the area of HR which includes several sub-mod-ules). ough the Commission contested the claim of incomplete data, it was proposed to introduce a field for comments in the complainant’s career history. e EDPS accepted the proposal as a temporary solution, and in addition requested explanations as to the technical difficulties concerning the right to rectification of career history data in Sysper2.
V skladu z lanskoletnim poročilom so bili analizirani tudi prenosi, zlasti s strani OLAF, podatkov v tretje države in mednarodne organizacije; v zvezi s tem je bil pripravljen osnutek predhodnega dokumenta. Pri tem je bila upoštevana potreba po strukturiranem pristopu s pragmatično razlago člena 9(8) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001, uporaba memorandumov o soglasju ter neizogibna uporaba izjem iz člena 9(6), z možnimi zaščitnimi ukrepi.
Both the interim solution and the explanations are pending.
Ta bo vključeval nekatere določbe o poizvedbah in bo v kratkem sprejet.
Complaint against an investigation by a DPO
Na podlagi zbranega gradiva bodo pripravljene smernice v zvezi z uporabo videonadzora.
Some of these complaints asked the EDPS to reconsider a position taken by a national data protection authority; which falls outside of his mandate. e complainants were informed that the European Commission would be competent in the event of a Member State failing to implement Directive 95/46/EC correctly.
Politika ENVP na področju pregledovanja bo najprej osredotočena na zagotovitev skladnosti, ki naj bi bila dosežena do pomladi 2007, na področju imenovanja uradnih oseb za varstvo podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti ter pri uradnem obveščanju o predhodnem preverjanju. Potem bo politika razširjena na nadzor popolne skladnosti z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001.
A complaint was received against an investigation carried out by a data protection officer (2006-451). e investigation by the DPO followed a request for access to a recalled e-mail. e complainant questioned whether this investigation was within the competence of the DPO, whether the procedure followed by the DPO was in conformity with the law and whether the measures adopted by the DPO respected the principles of proportionality, good faith and due diligence.
V zvezi z mnenji glede zahteve je treba povedati, da je ECB leta 2006 ENVP poslala svoj osnutek izvedbenih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe, da bi slednji podal mnenje (2006-541).
After carrying out an investigation into the facts of the case, and requesting further clarifications from the parties concerned, the EDPS concluded that the launching of the investigation was to be considered as lawful not only because the DPO could base his action on powers granted in the annex to the regulation, but also because the investigation was triggered by a request for access under Article 13 of the regulation.
ENVP je priporočil, naj podrobneje opredeli pooblastila in naloge uradnih oseb za varstvo podatkov, uresničevanje pravic posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, uradno obveščanje ipd. in s tem samemu besedilu uredbe da dodano vrednost.
However the EDPS considered the complaint as founded as the measures adopted by the DPO were excessive in the light of the interests at stake and the possibility of using other less intrusive means. e DPO has asked for revision and comments from the complainant are pending.
Izrazil je zadovoljstvo, ker se je ECB pred oceno uradnih oseb za varstvo podatkov posvetovala z ENVP in priporočil vključitev pomočnikov uradnih oseb za varstvo podatkov.
One such example was a staff member complaining about having received political information to his office address from a party in relation to elections in the Member State of his origin.
Glede izvajanja predpisov Uredbe in zlasti predpisov, ki se nanašajo na uradne osebe za varstvo podatkov (člen 24(8)), je to pooblastilo okrepljeno in sicer s členom 46(d).
In that case, it could not be excluded that the office address was provided by the institution to the permanent representation of the Member State.
Zelo pomembno je bilo posvetovanje s predsednikom Kolegija vodij uprav o osnutku opombe v zvezi z roki za hrambo zdravstvenih podatkov (2006-532).