natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In practice, therefore, respect for rights under EU law depends largely on the quality of their everyday work and on the extent to which supervisory bodies, including ombudsmen, succeed in promoting high quality administration and providing eTective remedies when needed.
Z upoštevanjem tega sem leta 2005 raziskal možnost nadaljnjega zagotavljanja in spodbujanja vloge varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic pri razvoju evropske pravne in politiÏne kulture.
This is becoming even more important in light of the fact that co-operation among the various Member States’ administrations and the EU institutions continues to grow in scope and intensity.
Da bi to omogoÏil, sem zatrjeval, da mora mreža zagotoviti, da bo dodana vrednost, ki jo državljani pridob`o iz sodelovanja, postala opaznejša, tako za same državljane kot za nosilce politiÏnih odloÏitev na vseh ravneh Un`e. Glede zadnjega je treba opraviti še veliko dela. Dokazati moramo še, da je treba kljub raznolikosti,
To do this, I argued that the Network needs to make the added value that citizens derive from co-operation more visible, both to citizens themselves and to policy-makers at all levels in the Union.
UVOD ki jo prinašajo vedno novi politiÏni dogodki, za katere redno skrb`o organi držav Ïlanic in instituc` e EU, varuhe Ïlovekovih pravic polno upoštevati.
As a contribution to establishing a clearer public identity for our co-operation, I announced that my o U ce plans to invest resources to further develop our use of the internet to communicate both with the public and amongst ourselves.
Najavil sem, da namerava moj urad v prizadevanju, da bi bolj poudaril javni znaÏaj našega sodelovanja, vložiti sredstva v še intenzivnejšo uporabo medmrežja za komuniciranje z javnostjo in naše medsebojno komuniciranje.
Such an exercise can thus only strengthen the co-operation that has been developed to date.
S tem lahko tako samo okrepimo dosedanje sodelovanje.
With a view to best serving citizens in the Union, we organised in 2005, as part of our tenth anniversary celebrations, events for the media, NGOs, interest groups, regional and local representation o U ces, and citizens in general.
Za zagotavljanje najboljših storitev državljanom v Un`i smo leta 2005, v okviru praznovanja desete obletnice, organizirali dogodke za med`e, nevladne organizac`e, interesne skupine in lokalne predstavniške urade in državljane na splošno.
Relatively speaking, the Ombudsman o T ers a fast service and one that is free and flexible.
Je posplošimo, varuh Ïlovekovih pravic ponuja hitro, brezplaÏno in prilagodljivo storitev.
For those who fear negative repercussions from the institutions if they complain, I will continue to make clear that any amempt to disadvantage, or threaten to disadvantage, a person for exercising the right to complain to the Ombudsman would itself be maladministration.
Vsem, ki se boj`o negativnega odziva instituc`, bom še naprej pojasnjeval, da je že vsak poskus škodovati oziroma vsak poskus grožnje s škodo osebi, ker je uresniÏila svojo pravico do pritožbe pri varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic, sam po sebi nepravilnost.
EU institutions and bodies should take the necessary steps to ensure that their o U cials are aware of this and act accordingly.
Instituc` e in organi EU morajo sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se bodo njihovi uradniki tega zavedali in ustrezno ravnali.
These are testing times for the European Union.
To je Ïas velikih preizkusov za Evropsko un`o. Državljani Franc`e in Nizozemske so glasovali proti ratifi kac` i Ustave za Evropo, volilna udeležba na evropskih volitvah še naprej pada, Un`a pa se še vedno bori z mnenjem, da je odroÏna birokrac`a, ki jo sestavlja politiÏna elita.
Citizens in France and the Netherlands voted not to ratify the Constitution for Europe, voter turnout at European elections continues to decline, and the
Temeljni vidik instituc` e je, da je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic fi z i Ï na oseba, ki osebno komunicira s posamezniki, ki mu pišejo, pregleduje njihove primere in poskuša reševati njihove pritožbe.
INTRODUCTION
UVOD del strukture za gradnjo zaupanja med državljani in instituc`ami.
He can help promote a constructive dialogue between the two sides.
Pomaga lahko pri spodbujanju konstruktivnega dialoga med obema stranema.
As one complainant wrote, “For me, this case has finally ended and I hope that a new page can now open as far as my activities are concerned as they are intimately linked to Europe.
Kot je napisal eden od pritožnikov, „Zame se je ta primer konÏno zakljuÏil in upam, da lahko v zvezi z mojimi dejavnostmi sedaj obrnem novo stran, saj so tesno povezane z Evropo.
Your institution o T ers a very important recourse enabling citizens to resolve, in a friendly manner, sensitive problems they may face with the European institutions.”
Vaša instituc` a je zelo pomemben vir, ki državljanom omogoÏa, da sporazumno rešujejo obÏutljive težave, na katere nalet`o pri evropskih instituc`ah.“ ah.“
It highlights important new developments and gives an overview of the complaints dealt with during the year, including a thematic analysis of the results of cases closed a W er an inquiry. This analysis covers the most significant findings of law and fact contained in the Ombudsman’s decisions in 2005.
Opisuje pomembnejše spremembe in vsebuje pregled pritožb, ki so bile obravnavane med letom, vkljuÏno s tematsko analizo rezultatov v primerih, ki so se zakljuÏili s preiskavo. Analiza obsega najpomembnejše ugotovitve in dejstva iz sklepov varuha v letu 2004.
Chapter 3 consists of a selection of summaries of those decisions, illustrating the range of subjects and institutions involved in complaints and own-initiative inquiries.
V poglavju 3 so zbrani povzetki sklepov, ki ponazarjajo razpon podroÏ` in instituc`, vpletenih v pritožbe in preiskave na lastno pobudo.
Annex E describes the procedure for electing the European Ombudsman and gives an account of the re-election of Mr DIAMANDOUROS in January 2005.
Priloga E opisuje postopek izvolitve evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic in ponovno izvolitev g. DIAMANDOUROSA januarja 2005.
The o U ce of European Ombudsman was established by the Maastricht Treaty as part of the citizenship of the European Union.
Urad Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic je bil ustanovljen z Maastrichtsko pogodbo v okviru pravic iz državljanstva Evropske un`e.
The Ombudsman also began five inquiries on his own initiative.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je izvedel pet preiskav na lastno pobudo.
As in previous years, most of the inquiries concerned the European Commission (68% of the total).
Kot v preteklih letih se je tudi tokrat veÏina preiskav nanašala na Evropsko komis`o (68 % vseh preiskav).
Given that the Commission is the main Community institution that makes decisions having a direct impact on citizens, it is normal that it should be the principal object of citizens’ complaints.
Glede na dejstvo, da je Komis`a osrednja instituc` a Skupnosti, ki sprejema odloÏitve in neposredno vpliva na državljane, je normalno, da je glavni predmet pritožb državljanov.
There were 73 inquiries concerning the European Communities Personnel Selection OUce (EPSO), 58 concerning the European Parliament and 14 concerning the Council of the European Union.
73 preiskav se je nanašalo na Urad za izbor osebja Evropskih skupnosti (EPSO), 58 na Evropski parlament in 14 na Svet Evropske un`e. e.
The main types of maladministration alleged were lack of transparency, including refusal of information (188 cases), unfairness or abuse of power (132 cases), discrimination (103 cases), unsatisfactory procedures (78 cases), avoidable delay (73 cases), negligence (44 cases), failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is failure by the European Commission to carry out its role as “guardian of the Treaty” vis-à-vis the Member States (37 cases), and legal error (29 cases).
V glavnem so se domnevne nepravilnosti nanašale na pomanjkanje preglednosti, vkljuÏno z zavraÏanjem posredovanja podatkov (188 primerov), nepraviÏnost ali zlorabo pooblastil (132 primerov), diskriminac`o (103 primeri), nezadovoljive postopke (78 primerov), nepotrebne zamude (73 primerov), malomarnost (44 primerov), neizpolnjevanje obveznosti, tj. neuspešnost Komis`e pri izvajanju vloge „varuha Pogodbe“ v odnosu do držav Ïlanic (37 primerov) in pravne napake (29 primerov).
The European Commission explained the reasoning behind its decision not to pursue an inquiry against the Spanish authorities concerning alleged discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Evropska komis`a je pojasnila argumente za svojo odloÏitev, da ne bo sprožila preiskave proti španskim organom glede domnevne diskriminac`e na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti.
It should be noted that 335 of these complaints were on the same subject and were treated in a single joint inquiry (see summary of case 3452/2004/JMA and others in the sub-section entitled ”no maladministration”).
Treba je opozoriti, da se je 335 teh pritožb nanašalo na isto zadevo in so bile obravnavane v eni skupni preiskavi (glej povzetek zadeve 3452/2004/JMA in druge v podpoglavju z naslovom „brez nepravilnosti“).
The Ombudsman's inquiry into the free lending of books from public libraries helped clarify both the reasons for the Commission's decision to start infringement proceedings against Spain and the possibilities to correctly implement the relevant Community Directive without undermining this free lending.
Preiskava varuha Ïlovekovih pravic glede proste izposoje knjig v javnih knjižnicah je pomagala pojasniti razloge za odloÏitev Komis`e, da bo proti Špan`i uvedla postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, in možnosti za pravilno izvajanje ustreznih direktiv Skupnosti brez spodkopavanja te proste izposoje.
The Ombudsman was acting on the basis of 389 complaints which alleged that the Commission's decision to pursue this case against Spain undermined the existence of public libraries as a basic public service and went against the fundamental rights of citizens to have access to culture.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je deloval na podlagi 389 pritožb, ki so navajale, da je odloÏitev Komis`e o uvedbi primera proti Špan`i spodkopala obstoj javnih knjižnic kot osnovne javne storitve in kršila temeljne pravice državljanov do dostopa do kulturnih dobrin. Preiskava je bila zakljuÏena, ko so varuha Ïlovekovih pravic obvestili, da je Komis`a zadevo predala SodišÏu Evropskih skupnosti.
The Ombudsman suggested that the Commission review its internal rules on telephone logs in the framework of calls for tender.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je predlagal, da Komis`a preuÏi svoja interna pravila o telefonskih izpiskih v okviru razpisa.
This followed his inquiry into the propriety of a telephone conversation that had taken place between the Commission services and the complainant's rival bidder.
To je sledilo njegovi preiskavi o primernosti telefonskih pogovorov, ki so potekali med službami Komis`e in konkurentom pritožnika pri razpisu.
The Ombudsman found no evidence of impropriety but noted that it would have been easier for the Commission to deal with the complainant's concerns if it had been able to produce a wrimen record of the telephone conversation in question. (1808/2004/JMA)
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic ni našel nobenega dokaza o neprimernosti, vendar je opozoril, da bi se Komis`a lažje odzvala na pomisleke pritožnika, Ïe bi lahko pripravila pisno evidenco zadevnega telefonskega pogovora. (1808/2004/JMA)
Following an inquiry into complaints that the Commission and the Council failed to ensure a s u U cient number of parking spaces for people with disabilities near their main buildings in Brussels, the Ombudsman welcomed their requests to the Belgian authorities to ensure additional parking places and asked to be kept informed of the results.
Na podlagi preiskave pritožbe, da Komis`a in Svet nista zagotovila dovolj parkirnih mest za invalidne osebe v bližini njunih glavnih zgradb v Bruslju, je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic pozdravil njune zahteve belg`skim organom, da zagotov`o dodatna parkirna mesta, in zahteval, da se ga obvešÏajo o rezultatih.
He invited the Council, in addition, to reconsider its policy of limiting access to its own parking spaces for disabled people on grounds of security and, in this regard, suggested it follow the example of the Commission.
Poleg tega je varuh Svet pozval, naj zaradi varnosti ponovno razmisli o svoji politiki omejevanja dostopa do njegovih parkirnih mest za invalidne osebe, in mu v tej zvezi predlagal, naj sledi primeru Komis`e. (2415/2003/JMA in 237/2004/JMA).
With a view to improving the eUciency and transparency of its relationship with citizens, the Ombudsman stated that the Commission could clarify its procedures for dealing with complaints concerning the use of EU financial assistance.
Z namenom izboljšanja uÏinkovitosti in preglednosti svojih odnosov z državljani je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic izjavil, da bi Komis`a lahko pojasnila svoje postopke za obravnavo pritožb v zvezi z uporabo fi na n Ï ne podpore EU.
This followed his inquiry into the Commission's handling of a complaint concerning the reduction of a grant by the regional authorities of Madrid.
To je sledilo njegovi preiskavi, kako je Komis`a obravnavala pritožbo v zvezi z zmanjšanjem dotac`regionalnih organov v Madridu.
As a result of the Ombudsman's inquiry, the Commission agreed to provide information to the complainant, acknowledging and apologising for its delay in informing him about its handling of his case. (274/2004/JMA)
Zaradi preiskave varuha Ïlovekovih pravic je Komis`a privolila, da bo pritožniku zagotovila informac`e, ter priznala svojo zamudo pri obvešÏanju pritožnika o obravnavi njegovega primera in se opraviÏila zanjo. (274/2004/JMA)
The European Personnel Selection OUce (EPSO) agreed to include in future notices of competition clarification that (i) an invitation to am end the pre-selection tests does not imply that the candidate's eligibility has been fully checked and (ii) the wrimen tests of candidates who are subsequently found to be ineligible will not be marked.
Urad za izbor osebja Evropskih skupnosti (EPSO) se je strinjal, da bo v prihodnja obvestila o razpisih vkljuÏil pojasnilo, da (i) povabilo k sodelovanju na preskusih predhodne izbire ne pomeni, da je bila ustreznost kandidata v celoti preverjena, in da (ii) pisni preskusi kandidatov, za katere je bila naknadno ugotovljena neustreznost, ne bodo ocenjeni.
The Commission semled a late payment case with a German science journalist, explained the reasons for the delay and agreed to pay interest.
Komis`a je z nemškim znanstvenim novinarjem uredila primer glede zamud pri plaÏilu, pojasnila razloge za zamudo in soglašala s plaÏilom obresti.
The Council assisted the Ombudsman in semling a case concerning the termination of the contract of a civilian IT expert in the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Sarajevo with the result that the EUPM agreed to pay the complainant the salary due to the normal end of his contract.
Svet je varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic pomagal pri ureditvi primera v zvezi s prekinitv`o pogodbe civilnega strokovnjaka na podroÏju informac`ske tehnolog`e v Polic`ski mis`i Evropske un`e (EUPM) v Sarajevu z rezultatom, da se je EUPM strinjal z izplaÏilom plaÏe pritožniku zaradi obiÏajnega izteka pogodbe.
The Commission released two lemers it had sent to the United Kingdom authorities in the framework of an infringement procedure, as well as the United Kingdom's response and apologised for the undue delay in handling the application for these documents.
Komis`a je objavila dve pismi, ki jih je v okviru postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev poslala organom Združenega kraljestva, ter odgovor Združenega kraljestva in se opraviÏila za nepotrebno zamudo pri obravnavi vloge za te dokumente.
Following further inquiries, the Commission also agreed to give the complainants access to three CD-ROMs containing the information the United Kingdom authorities had sent to the Commission to support their case.
Po nadaljnjih preiskavah se je Komis`a strinjala, da bo pritožnikom omogoÏila dostop do treh CD-ROM-ov, ki vsebujejo informac`e, ki so jih organi Združenega kraljestva poslali Komis`i za podporo njihovega primera.
In some cases, a friendly solution can be achieved if the institution or body concerned o T ers compensation to the complainant.
V nekaterih primerih to pomeni odškodnino, ki jo je instituc` a ali organ pripravljena ponuditi pritožniku.
Any such o T er is made ex gratia: that is, without admission of legal liability and without creating a precedent.
V tem primeru gre za dejanja ex gratia: to pomeni brez dopustitve pravne odgovornosti in brez oblikovanja precedensa.
At the end of 2005, 18 proposals for friendly solutions were still under consideration, including two cases in which the Ombudsman asked the Commission to re-examine its earlier rejections of proposals that were made in 2004.
Ob koncu leta 2005 je bilo 18 predlogov še v postopku preuÏitve, vkljuÏno z dvema primeroma, v katerih je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic od Komis`e zahteval, da ponovno preuÏi svojo zavrnitev predlogov iz leta 2004.
The Commission agreed to pay compensation of EUR 596 to a complainant whose case was not handled properly and in a timely fashion.
Komis`a se je strinjala s plaÏilom odškodnine pritožniku v višini 596 EUR, katerega primer ni bil ustrezno in pravoÏasno obravnavan.
Following the Ombudsman's inquiry into Parliament's information campaign in Finland for the European elections held in June 2004, the institution promised that its information o U ce in Helsinki would ensure that even greater care was taken in future in the use of languages.
Na podlagi preiskave varuha Ïlovekovih pravic v zvezi z informac`sko kampanjo parlamenta na Finskem za evropske volitve jun`a 2004 je instituc` a obljubila, da bo njen informac`ski urad na Finskem zagotovil, da bo v prihodnje bolj previden pri uporabi jezikov.
The Swedish Assembly of Finland had complained that posters used as part of the information campaign had been published only in the Finnish language.
Komis`a se je strinjala, da bo portugalski državljanki v duhu sprave plaÏala 1000 EUR, potem ko je priznala, da bi lahko sprejela ustrezne ukrepe in jo obvestila, da ne more zaÏeti delati pred datumom, ko bo dejansko nastopilo njeno delovno razmerje.
When a friendly solution is not possible, the Ombudsman may close the case with a critical remark or make a draW recommendation.
Je sporazumna rešitev ni m o g o Ï a , lahko varuh Ïlovekovih pravic zakljuÏi primer s k r i ti Ï n o pripombo ali sestavi osnutek priporoÏila.
A critical remark is normally made if it is no longer possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the instance of maladministration, the maladministration appears to have no general implications and no follow-up action by the Ombudsman seems necessary.
K r i ti Ï n o pripombo obiÏajno sestavi, Ïe je prepozno, da bi instituc` e primer nepravilnosti odpravile,Ïe nepravilnost nima splošnih posledic ali se zdi, da nadaljnji ukrepi varuha niso veÏ potrebni.
The Ombudsman criticised the Council for failing to deal with a request for public access to documents properly and carefully.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je Svet kritiziral, ker ni ustrezno in temeljito obravnaval zahteve po javnem dostopu do dokumentov.
The Ombudsman criticised the Commission in a case of late payment to a small German company which was a sub-contractor in the Galilei project.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je kritiziral Komis`o zaradi zamud pri plaÏilu majhnemu nemškemu podjetju, ki je bilo podizvajalec pri projektu Galileo.
This inquiry revealed a more general problem, namely that the relevant contractual framework neither required nor encouraged the main contractor to claim interest on behalf of sub-contractors if there was late payment by the Commission.
Ta preiskava je pokazala na splošno težavo, in sicer, da ustrezen pogodbeni okvir ni niti zahteval od glavnega izvajalca niti ga ni spodbujal, da zahteva plaÏilo obresti v imenu podizvajalcev, Ïe bo Komis`a zamujala s plaÏilom.
The Commission confirmed that it would strive to take the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises into account in future standard contracts, to the extent that this is compatible with the Community's financial interests and the legislative provisions in force. (530/2004/GG)
Komis`a je potrdila, da si bo toliko prizadevala upoštevati interese majhnih in srednje velikih podjet` v prihodnjih tipskih pogodbah, da bo to v skladu s fi na n Ï ni mi interesi in veljavnimi zakonodajnimi doloÏbami Skupnosti. (530/2004/GG)
The Ombudsman criticised OLAF in respect of its handling of information that a German o U cial had submimed to it about suspected illegalities at a Community body.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je kritiziral OLAF zaradi njegove obravnave informac`, ki mu jih je predložil nemški uradnik v zvezi z domnevnimi nepravilnostmi v organu Skupnosti.
During 2005, the Commission informed the Ombudsman of its follow-up on 18 critical remarks, including:
Leta 2005 je tako Komis`a obvestila varuha o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi z 18 kritiÏnimi pripombami, med drugim:
A case in which the Ombudsman criticised the Commission for failing to provide an adequate explanation for the length of an investigation, which had taken just under three years.
Komis`a, ki se je sklicevala na splošne dejavnike, kot je velika delovna obremenjenost, ki lahko povzroÏajo zamudo, je varuha Ïlovekovih pravic obvestila, da si bo ob morebitnem podobnem primeru v prihodnosti prizadevala za natanÏnejšo razlago. (2229/2003/MHZ)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
POVZETEK prejela osnutek priporoÏila.
During 2005, 20 draW recommendations were made.
Tr`e primeri so privedli do posebnega poroÏila Evropskemu parlamentu.
In addition, eight draW recommendations from 2004 led to decisions in 2005.
Šest primerov je bilo zakljuÏenih iz drugih razlogov.
The Commission agreed to pay compensation of EUR 56 000 to a French journalist.
Komis`a se je strinjala, da bo francoskemu novinarju plaÏala odškodnino v višini 56 000 EUR.
It followed his finding that the Commission had failed to respect the complainant's reasonable expectations.
Sledila je njegovim ugotovitvam, da Komis`a ni upoštevala pritožnikovih upraviÏenih priÏakovanj.
The Commission had cancelled its financial contribution to the complainant's project. (2111/2002/MF)
Komis`a je ukinila svoj fi na n Ï ni prispevek za pritožnikov projekt. (2111/2002/MF)
The Commission abolished the age limit of 30 years as one of the selection criteria in its inservice traineeship programme.
Komis`a je v svojem programu usposabljanja ob delu ukinila starostno mejo 30 let kot enega od izbirnih meril.
The Commission agreed to give public access to a lemer that the Portuguese Minister of Finance had sent it concerning the Portuguese excessive deficit procedure.
Komis`a se je strinjala, da bo omogoÏila javni dostop do pisma, ki ji ga je poslal portugalski minister za finance glede postopka v zvezi s Ïezmernim primanjkljajem na Portugalskem.
The Commission had refused a Member of the European Parliament access to the lemer on the grounds that its disclosure would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards the financial, monetary or economic policy of Portugal.
Komis`a je Ïlanu Evropskega parlamenta zavrnila dostop do pisma, ker je menila, da bi njegovo razkritje spodkopalo zašÏito javnega interesa v zvezi s fi na n Ï n o , monetarno in ekonomsko politiko Portugalske.
The Ombudsman approached the Portuguese authorities who informed him that, in the country's current budgetary situation, the lemer did not contain elements which could aTect Portugal's economic and financial policy. (116/2005/MHZ)
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je navezal stik s portugalskimi organi in ti so ga obvestili, da glede na trenutno proraÏunsko situac`o v državi pismo ne vsebuje elementov, ki bi lahko vplivali na portugalsko ekonomsko in fi na n Ï n o politiko. (116/2005/MHZ)
The Ombudsman submimed a special report to Parliament a W er the Council failed to give valid reasons for refusing to meet in public whenever it is acting in its legislative capacity.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je Parlamentu poslal posebno poroÏilo, potem ko Svet ni podal veljavnih razlogov za zavrnitev javnosti zasedanj v vlogi zakonodajnega organa.