natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Second, the fact that the contested decision resulted in the prohibition of the maintenance in force of the allocation guarantee which could have been claimed by certain operators under Article 8 of the ZuG 2007 is not such as to confer on that decision the character of a bundle of individual decisions.
Drugič, dejstvo, da je imela sporna odločba za posledico prepoved ohraniti v veljavi jamstvo za dodelitev, do katerega bi bili nekateri upravljavci na podlagi člena 8 ZuG 2007 upravičeni, tej odločbi ne podeljuje značaja svežnja posamičnih odločb.
In that regard, in contrast to what is submitted by the appellant in this appeal, the fact that the NAP notified by the Member State to the Commission must contain a list of the installations covered by the emission trading scheme and a statement of the allowances which that State intends to grant to those installations does not make it possible to conclude that, by the contested decision, the Commission ruled on the individual applications, as in the situation which characterised the International Fruit Company case.
S tem da mora NNR, ki ga je država članica predložila Komisiji, vsebovati seznam naprav, ki jih pokriva sistem za trgovanje s pravicami, in navedbo pravic, ki jih ta država namerava dodeliti navedenim napravam, ni mogoče sklepati, v nasprotju s trditvami tožeče stranke v tej pritožbi, da se je Komisija s sporno odločbo izrekla o posamičnih zahtevah, kot je bilo značilno za zadevo International Fruit Company in drugi proti Komisiji, v kateri je bila izdana zgoraj navedena sodba.
That finding is corroborated by the fact that the list provided for in point 10 in Annex III to Directive 2003/87 refers to the installations concerned and not a list by name of the operators to whom allowances are allocated.
Tovrstno ugotovitev potrjuje dejstvo, da se seznam iz Priloge III, točka 10, k Direktivi 2003/87 nana�a na zadevne naprave in ne na seznam, na katerem so poimensko navedeni upravljavci, ki so jim bile pravice dodeljene.
In addition, in accordance with Article 11(2) and (3) of that directive, it is for each Member State, not the Commission, to decide on the total quantity of allowances it will allocate for the period in question, to initiate the process of allocation of those allowances and to rule on allocation of those allowances.
Poleg tega je vsaka država članica in ne Komisija dolžna v skladu s členom 11(2) in (3) te direktive odločiti o skupni količini pravic, ki jih bo dodelila v zadevnem obdobju, o začetku postopka dodelitve teh pravic upravljavcu posamezne naprave in o dodelitvi navedenih pravic.
Such a decision is based on its NAP developed pursuant to Article 9 and in accordance with Article 10 of that directive.
Tovrstna odločba se sprejme na podlagi njenega NNR, pripravljenega na podlagi člena 9, in v skladu s členom 10 navedene direktive.
Finally, as the Court of First Instance pointed out in paragraph 67 of the order under appeal, it is not possible to derive from the objectives of Directive 2003/87, read in the light of recital 5 in the preamble, from criterion 5 in Annex III, or from any other provision of that directive, a guarantee for the operators of installations that a particular allocation method will be applied to them, let alone that they will obtain a particular quantity of greenhouse gas emission allowances.
Nazadnje, kot je poudarilo Sodi�če prve stopnje v točki 67 izpodbijanega sklepa, niti iz ciljev Direktive 2003/87, branih glede na njeno peto uvodno izjavo, niti iz merila 5 iz Priloge III niti iz katere koli druge določbe navedene direktive ne izhaja jamstvo za upravljavce naprav, da se zanje uporabi določena metoda dodelitve ali da celo pridobijo določeno količino pravic do emisije toplogrednih plinov.
Moreover, the amendments to its NAP II introduced subsequently by the Federal Republic of Germany and accepted by the Commission confirm that finding.
Poleg tega spremembe, ki jih je v NNR II Zvezna republika Nemčija uvedla pozneje in jih je Komisija sprejela, potrjujejo to ugotovitev.
In those circumstances, the Court of First Instance did not err in law in the application of Article 230 EC by finding that the contested decision was of general application and therefore not of individual concern to the appellant.
V teh okoli�činah Sodi�če prve stopnje ni napačno uporabilo prava pri uporabi člena 230 ES, ker je �telo, da ima sporna odločba splo�en obseg in zato tožeče stranke ne zadeva posamično.
In view of all the foregoing considerations, this plea in law must be rejected as being clearly unfounded and the appeal, therefore, dismissed in its entirety.
Ob upo�tevanju zgoraj navedenih preudarkov je treba ta pritožbeni razlog zavreči kot očitno neutemeljen in zato zavrniti pritožbo v celoti.
Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, which is, pursuant to Article 118 of those rules, applicable to the procedure on appeal, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings.
Na podlagi člena 69(2) Poslovnika, ki se uporablja za pritožbeni postopek na podlagi člena 118 tega poslovnika, se neuspeli stranki naloži plačilo stro�kov, če so bili ti prigla�eni.
As the Commission has applied for costs against Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland, which has been unsuccessful, it must be ordered to pay the costs.
Komisija je predlagala, naj se družbi Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland naloži plačilo stro�kov, in ker ta s svojimi predlogi ni uspela, se ji naloži plačilo stro�kov.
On those grounds, the Court (Sixth Chamber) hereby:
Iz teh razlogov je Sodi�če (�esti senat) sklenilo:
Orders Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH to pay the costs.
Družbi Saint-Gobain Glass Deutschland GmbH se naloži plačilo stroškov.
Case C-265/06
Zadeva C-265/06
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Free movement of goods — Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — Articles 11 and 13 of the EEA Agreement — Quantitative restrictions on imports — Measures having equivalent effect — Motor vehicles — Affixing of tinted film to windows)
„Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Prosti pretok blaga – Člena 28 ES in 30 ES – Člena 11 in 13 Sporazuma EGP – Količinske omejitve pri uvozu – Ukrepi z enakim učinkom – Motorna vozila – Pritrjevanje barvnih folij na stekla“
I - 2247Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 10 April 2008 . . . . . . . . . . .
Trstenjak, predstavljeni . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Free movement of goods — Quantitative restrictions — Measures having equivalent effect(Arts 28 EC and 30 EC; EEA Agreement, Arts 11 and 13)
Prosti pretok blaga – Količinske omejitve – Ukrepi z enakim učinkom(člena 28 ES in 30 ES; Sporazum EGP, člena 11 in 13)
SUMMARY — CASE C-265/06 simple observation from outside the vehicles, it does not follow that it is necessary to attain those objectives.
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-265/06 omogoča pregled notranjosti motornih vozil že na podlagi opazovanja od zunaj, vendar pa iz tega ne izhaja, da je potrebna za uresničitev teh ciljev.
In that connection, a visual inspection is only one means among others in order to fight crime and prevent offences relating to the obligation to wear seat belts, and at least some films, namely those with a sufficient degree of transparency, permit the desired visual inspection of the interior of motor vehicles.
V tem pogledu je vizualni pregled po eni strani le eden izmed ukrepov, ki so na voljo v okviru boja proti kriminalu in proti kr�itvam obvezne uporabe varnostnega pasu, in po drugi strani vsaj nekatere folije, namreč tiste, ki so dovolj prosojne, omogočajo želen vizualni pregled notranjosti motornih vozil.
A Member State whose legislation prohibits the affixing of tinted film to the windscreens and the windows alongside the passenger seats in motor vehicles fails to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 EC and 30 EC and Articles 11 and 13 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
Država članica, katere zakonodaja prepoveduje pritrjevanje barvnih folij na vetrobransko steklo in na stekla ob sedežih potnikov v motornih vozilih, ne izpolnjuje obveznosti iz členov 28 ES in 30 ES ter iz členov 11 in 13 Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru.
That prohibition affects the marketing of almost all coloured film, lawfully manufactured and marketed in other Member States or in States party to the EEA Agreement intended to be affixed to the windows of motor vehicles and is excessive and disproportionate with respect to the objectives of combating crime and ensuring road safety which it seeks to guarantee.
Ta prepoved namreč vpliva na prodajo skoraj vseh barvnih folij, ki so se v drugih državah članicah ali državah pogodbenicah Sporazuma EGP proizvedle in prodajale v skladu s predpisi z namenom njihove pritrditve na stekla motornih vozil, in je prekomerna in nesorazmerna s ciljem boja proti kriminalu in varnosti cestnega prometa, ki naj bi ga zagotavljala.
(see paras 35, 38, 40-42, 46, 47)
(Glej točke 35, 38, od 40 do 42, 46 in 47.)
Primary Community law
Primarno pravo Skupnosti
Article 28 EC prohibits quantitative restrictions on imports between Member States and all measures having equivalent effect.
S členom 28 ES so med državami članicami prepovedane količinske omejitve pri uvozu in vsi ukrepi z enakim učinkom.
The Commission of the European Communities has brought an action pursuant to Article 226 EC for a declaration that, by adopting national legislation which prohibits the affixing of tinted film to the windows of passenger or goods vehicles, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 EC and 30 EC and under Articles 11 and 13 of the Agreement of 2 May 1992 on the European Economic Area 2 (‘the EEA Agreement’).
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti je na podlagi člena 226 ES vložila tožbo, s katero predlaga, naj se ugotovi, da Portugalska republika, s tem da je sprejela nacionalne predpise, s katerimi je prepovedala pritrditev barvnih folij na stekla osebnih ali tovornih motornih vozil, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz členov 28 ES in 30 ES ter členov 11 in 13 Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru 2 z dne 2. maja 1992 (v nadaljevanju: Sporazum EGP).
Under Article 30 EC, prohibitions or restrictions on imports are permitted if they are justified in particular on grounds of public security and the protection of health and life of humans, provided they do not constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States.
V skladu s členom 30 ES so dovoljene prepovedi ali omejitve pri uvozu, ki so utemeljene zlasti z javno varnostjo ter varovanjem zdravja in življenja ljudi, če niso sredstvo za samovoljno diskriminacijo ali prikrito omejevanje trgovine med državami članicami.
Directive 2001/92/EC 3(‘Directive 2001/92’) adapts to technical progress Council Directive 92/22/EEC on safety glazing and glazing materials on motor vehicles and their trailers and Council Directive 70/156/EEC relating to the typeapproval of motor vehicles and their trailers.
Tudi tretja uvodna izjava in Priloga II B k Direktivi 2001/92 napotujeta na predpise o splo�nih in posebnih zahtevah, preizkusu in tehničnih zahtevah, določenih v zadnji različici pravilnika �t. 43 Gospodarske komisije ZN za Evropo 5(v nadaljevanju: pravilnik �t.
The third recital in the preamble and Annex IIB to Directive 2001/92 refer in turn to the provisions governing the general and individual specifications, tests and technical requirements set out in Regulation No 43 of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, in the most recent version adopted by the European Community 5(‘Regulation No 43’), according to which safety glazing must have a regular transmission of at least 70%, whilst the transmission of windscreens may be no less than 75%. 6
Z Direktivo 2001/92/ES 3(v nadaljevanju: Direktiva 2001/92) sta bili tehničnemu napredku prilagojeni Direktiva Sveta 92/22/EGS o varnostnih steklih in materialih za zasteklitev na motornih vozilih in njihovih priklopnikih ter Direktiva Sveta 70/156/EGS o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o homologaciji motornih in priklopnih vozil.
Directive 92/22, in the form amended by Directive 2001/92, applies to glazing which is intended to offer protection against the effects of the sun (tinted windows), but not
Vendar se Direktiva 92/22, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2001/92, glede stekel, ki so namenjena varovanju pred sončno pripeko (obarvana stekla), ne uporablja za barvne folije, ki so se na stekla osebnih ali tovornih motornih vozil pritrdila po njihovem začetku uporabe.
5 — Since the end of the 1950s the technical regulations for motor vehicles have been harmonised at international level in order to remove barriers to trade in motor vehicles and accessories for the benefit of consumers.
5 – Od konca 50-ih let so bili usklajeni tehnični predpisi na mednarodni ravni za motorna vozila, da bi se v korist potro�nikov odpravile ovire v trgovini z motornimi vozili in opremo.
The basis is an Agreement concluded on 20 March 1958 in the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and amended with effect from 16 October 1995.
Podlaga je sporazum, sklenjen 20. marca 1958 v okviru Gospodarske komisije Združenih narodov za Evropo (ECE), ki spremenjen velja od 16. oktobra 1995.
The Agreement (‘Revision 2 of the Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions’) currently has 47 contracting parties, including the European Community (see Sündermann, B., ‘Internationale Harmonisierung der technischen Vorschriften für Kraftfahrzeuge und Übernahme in deutsches Recht’, Straßenverkehrsrecht — Zeitschrift für die Praxis des Verkehrsjuristen, 2006, pp. 49 and 50).
Sporazum („Revizija 2 Sporazuma o sprejetju enotnih tehničnih predpisov za kolesna vozila, opremo in dele, ki se lahko vgradijo v kolesna vozila in/ali uporabijo na njih, in pogojih za vzajemno priznavanje homologacij, ki so dodeljene na podlagi teh predpisov“) je doslej podpisalo 47 pogodbenic, skupaj z Evropsko skupnostjo (glede tega glej Sündermann, B., „Internationale Harmonisierung der technischen Vorschriften für Kraftfahrzeuge und Übernahme in deutsches Recht“, Straßenverkehrsrecht – Zeitschrift für die Praxis des Verkehrsjuristen, 2006, str. 49 in 50).
On the basis of that Agreement, Regulation No 43 was adopted, laying down uniform provisions concerning the approval of safety glazing materials and their installation on vehicles.
Na podlagi tega sporazuma je bil sprejet pravilnik �t. 43, s katerim so določeni enotni pogoji za odobritev materialov za varnostno zasteklitev in njihovo vgradnjo v vozila.
Under the provisions concerning the scope of the regulation, it applies to safety glazing materials intended for installation as windscreens or other panes, or as partitioning, on powerdriven vehicles and their trailers, and to the fitting thereof, to the exclusion, however, of glazing for lighting and lightsignalling devices and instrument panels, and of special bulletproof glazings.
Glede na določbe o področju uporabe pravilnika leta velja za materiale za varnostno zasteklitev, namenjene vgradnji v motorna vozila ali njihove priklopnike kot vetrobranska stekla, druga stekla ali pregradna stekla, ter za njihovo vgradnjo; za zasteklitev svetlobnih in svetlobno-signalnih naprav in armaturnih plo�č ter posebnih strelno varnih zasteklitev pa se ne uporablja.
The regulation does not concern double-glazed windows.
Ta pravilnik ravno tako ne velja za dvojna stekla.
3 — Commission Directive 2001/92/EC of 30 October 2001 adapting to technical progress Council Directive 92/22/EEC on safety glazing and glazing materials on motor vehicles and their trailers and Council Directive 70/156/EEC relating to the typeapproval of motor vehicles and their trailers (OJ 2001 L 291, p. 24).
3 – Direktiva Komisije 2001/92/ES z dne 30. oktobra 2001 o prilagoditvi Direktive Sveta 92/22/EGS o varnostnih steklih in materialih za zasteklitev na motornih vozilih in njihovih priklopnikih ter Direktive Sveta 70/156/EGS o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o homologaciji motornih in priklopnih vozil tehničnemu napredku (UL L 291, str. 24).
6 — Regulation No 43, U niform provisions concerning the approval of safety glazing materials and their installation on vehicles, Annex 21, paragraph 4: ‘Specific provisions applicable to vehicles of categories M and N’ (see paragraphs 4.1.1, 4.2.1.1 and 4.2.2.1).
4 – Direktiva Sveta 92/22/EGS z dne 31. marca 1992 o varnostnih steklih in materialih za zasteklitev na motornih vozilih in njihovih priklopnikih (UL L 129, str. 11).
4 — Council Directive 92/22/EEC of 31 March 1992 on safety glazing and glazing materials on motor vehicles and their trailers (OJ 1992 L 129, p. 11).
6 – Pravilnik �t. 43, enotni pogoji za odobritev materialov za varnostno zasteklitev in njihovo vgradnjo v vozila, Priloga 21, �t.
COMMISSION v PORTUGAL means that a vehicle may be fitted with tinted glazing or tinted film with very weak light transmission on the rear windows, including the rear screen, provided that the vehicle has two external mirrors.
KOMISIJA PROTI PORTUGALSKI pomeni, da vozilo sme biti opremljeno z obarvano zasteklitvijo ali barvnimi folijami z zelo slabo prepustnostjo svetlobe za zadnja stekla, skupaj z zadnjim, če ima dve zunanji vzvratni ogledali.
Article 5 of Decree-Law No 40/2003 provides that from the entry into force of that rule the Direcção-Geral de Viação (Director-ate-General for Road Traffic) must refuse to grant EC typeapproval and national typeapproval to vehicle models which do not comply with the provisions of Decree-Law No 40/2003 regarding safety glazing.
V členu 5 DL 40/2003 je določeno, da mora Direcção-Geral de Viação (urad za cestni promet) od začetka veljavnosti te določbe zavrniti izdajo ES-homologacije in nacionalne homologacije za tiste modele vozil, pri katerih niso upo�tevane določbe DL 40/2003 o varnostni zasteklitvi.
III — Prelitigation procedure
III – Predhodni postopek
On 1 April 2004, the Commission sent a letter of formal notice to the Portuguese Government, in which it stated that, by prohibiting the affixing of tinted film to the windows of passenger or goods vehicles through the bringing into force of Article 2 of Decree-Law No 40/2003 without communicating a draft of that national provision to it in advance, the Portuguese Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 28 EC and 30 EC and Articles 11 and 13 of the EEA Agreement, together with Article 8 of Directive 98/34/EC (‘Directive 98/34’). 8
Komisija je 1. aprila 2004 na portugalsko vlado naslovila opomin, v katerem je navedla, da je Portugalska republika, s tem da je z uveljavitvijo člena 2 DL 40/2003 prepovedala pritrditev barvnih folij na stekla osebnih ali tovornih motornih vozil, ne da bi ji pred tem posredovala predlog tega nacionalnega predpisa, kr�ila obveznosti iz členov 28 ES in 30 ES, členov 11 in 13 Sporazuma EGP ter člena 8 Direktive 98/34/ES (v nadaljevanju: Direktiva 98/34). 8
Article 2(1) of Decree-Law No 40/2003 provides: ‘The affixing of tinted film to the windows of passenger or goods vehicles shall be prohibited with the exception of lawful stickers and dark, non-reflective film to the goods compartment of goods vehicles’.
V členu 2(1) DL 40/2003 je določeno: „Prepovedano je pritrjevanje barvnih folij na �ipe osebnih ali tovornih motornih vozil, razen lepljenja v skladu s predpisi in lepljenja temnih, neodsevnih folij na nosilno ploskev“.
8 — Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37).
8 – Direktiva 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov (UL L 204, str. 37).
In its letter of 28 June 2004, the Portuguese Government replied that the abovementioned prohibition constituted a measure to protect internal security, in particular public policy and road safety, which was permitted under Article 30 EC.
Portugalska vlada je v sporočilu z dne 28. junija 2004 odgovorila, da navedena prepoved pomeni ukrep za varovanje notranje varnosti, zlasti javnega reda in varnosti cestnega prometa, ki naj bi bil dovoljen na podlagi člena 30 ES.
After the draft decree laying down technical rules concerning the affixing of tinted film to the windows of motor vehicles had been communicated to the Commission on 21 December 2005, 9the Commission decided to withdraw the complaint concerning an infringement of Article 8 of Directive 98/34.
Potem ko je bil Komisiji 21. decembra 2005 posredovan predlog dekreta o določitvi tehničnih predpisov o pritrjevanju barvnih folij na stekla motornih vozil, 9se je ta odločila, da umakne očitke v zvezi s kr�itvijo člena 8 Direktive 98/34.
By letter of 22 December 2004, the Commission sent the Portuguese Government a reasoned opinion.
Z dopisom z dne 22. decembra 2004 je Komisija portugalski vladi posredovala obrazloženo mnenje.
In that reasoned opinion, the Commission stated that it was in no doubt that the Portuguese Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under Art- icles 28 EC and 30 EC and Articles 11 and 13 of the EEA Agreement, because the prohibition contained in Article 2 of Decree-Law No 40/2003 hindered trade in tinted film lawfully manufactured and marketed in another Member State or a Contracting State to the EEA Agreement.
V njem je izpostavila svoje prepričanje, da je portugalska vlada kr�ila obveznosti iz členov 28 ES in 30 ES ter člena 11 in 13 Sporazuma EGP, ker naj bi prepoved iz člena 2 DL 40/2003 ovirala trgovanje z barvnimi folijami, ki so bile proizvedene ali so se prodajale v drugi državi članici ali državi pogodbenici Sporazuma EGP.
Furthermore, the Commission once again alleged a breach of the duty of communication laid down by Article 8 of Directive 98/34.
Poleg tega ji je Komisija ponovno očitala kr�itev obveznosti sporočanja, določene v členu 8 Direktive 98/34.
The Commission also required the Portuguese Government to take the measures necessary to comply with the reasoned opinion within a period of two months of its notification.
Komisija je portugalsko vlado nadalje pozvala, naj v dveh mesecih po vročitvi sprejme ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev z obrazloženim mnenjem.
None the less, in its application the Commission has maintained the complaint concerning the incompatibility with Article 28 EC and Article 11 of the EEA Agreement of the prohibition under Article 2 of Decree-Law No 40/2003 on affixing tinted film to the windows of passenger or goods vehicles, since, to its knowledge, the Portuguese Republic has not yet repealed the contested national provision.
Nasprotno pa je Komisija v tožbi vztrajala pri očitkih, da je prepoved pritrditve barvnih folij na stekla osebnih ali tovornih motornih vozil iz člena 2 DL 40/2003 nezdružljiva s členom 28 ES in členom 11 Sporazuma EGP, ker po njenem vedenju Portugalska republika do takrat ni razveljavila spornega nacionalnega predpisa.
Subsequently, by letter of 22 July 2005, the Portuguese Government gave notice of its intention to repeal Article 2 of Decree-Law No 40/2003.
Nato je portugalska vlada z dopisom z dne 22. julija 2005 sporočila, da namerava razveljaviti člen 2 DL 40/2003.
IV — Proceedings before the Court and forms of order sought by the parties
IV – Postopek pred Sodiščem in predlogi strank
In its application, which was lodged at the Court Registry on 16 June 2006, the Commission claims that the Court should:
Komisija v tožbi, ki je bila v sodnem tajni�tvu Sodi�ča vložena 16. junija 2006, Sodi�ču predlaga, naj členom 2(1) DL 40/2003 z dne 11. marca 2003 prepovedala pritrjevanje barvnih folij na stekla motornih vozil, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz členov 28 ES in 30 ES ter členov 11 in 13 Sporazuma EGP, ker ta prepoved preprečuje, da bi se na Portugalskem prodajale barvne folije, ki so se v drugi državi članici ali državi podpisnici Sporazuma EGP proizvedle in/ali prodajale v skladu s predpisi, in sicer zaradi brezpredmetnosti te ugotovitve, ker je Portugalska republika sklenila na splo�no dopustiti pritrjevanje barvnih folij na stekla motornih vozil;