natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Asregardstheevaluation of the achievement of objectives, the Court found that monitoringinformationdidnotallow such an evaluation becausetheindicators establishedweretoonarrowlyfocused, targets wereoftennotprovidedandthe information itself was unreliable or incomplete.
Glede vrednotenja doseganjaciljevje Sodišče ugotovilo, dainformacije o spremljanju takšnega vrednotenja niso omogočale, kerso bili vzpostavljeni kazalniki preozko usmerjeni,ciljipogostonisobilipodani, informacijesamepasobilenezanesljive in necelovite.
As a result the Court is of the opinionthatneithertheimplementing authoritiesinthe Member States nor the Commission werein a position to assess to what extentthe objectives were attained.
Zato Sodišče meni,daniti izvajalskiorganivdržavahčlanicahniti Komisija niso mogli oceniti, vkakšni meri so bili cilji doseženi.
Furthermore, projectselectioncriteriain the Member States audited did not take sufficient account of these analyses of the labour market nor ensure that projects se-lectedhadobjectives which wereinline with overall programme objectives.
Polegtegateanalizetrgadelanisobile dovoljupoštevaneprimerilihzaizbor projektovvrevidiranih državahčlanicah, ki pravtako nisozagotavljala, dasoimeli izbrani projekticilje,skladnessplošnimi cilji programa.
The Courtnotedthatthereisaneedfor the Commission to continue to monitor theestablishment bythe Member States ofappropriateandfeasibleindicators and that reliable data be collected, thereby allowing meaningful conclusions to be drawn on the efficiency and effectiveness ofthe cofinanced actions.
Sodiščejepriporočilo,daseprihodnji operativni programi vzpostavijo glede na analizotrgadela,vrstausposabljanjain ciljev pa naj seizbere kot neposredni od-govornatoanalizo.Priporočilojetudi, dasevzpostaviuspešenpostopekzaiz-bor projektov,s katerimse odobrijo projekti, ki so najboljši odziv na težave, ugotovljene z analizo.
No 2081/93 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 (OJ L 193, 31.7.1993, p. 5).
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2081/93 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 2052/88 (UL L 193, 31.7.93, str. 5).
The latest report (COM(2008) 10
Zadnje poročilo (COM(2008)
Article 2 of the Treaty establishing the European Community lays downthe promotion ofequality between menand women as one of its fundamental principles.
Člen 2 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropskeskupnostikot eno odte-meljnih načel Pogodbe določa spodbujanje enakosti med moškimi in ženskami.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/931declared the principle of equal opportunities for men and women onthe employment marketto bea Community goal to which structural measures should contribute.
Z Uredbo Sveta(EGS) št. 2081/931je bilo načelo enakih možnosti za moškein ženske natrgu delovnesilerazglašeno za cilj Skupnosti, k doseganju katerega bi morali prispevati strukturni ukrepi.
Equality between gendersis the possibilityfor women and men alike to participate and berepresented equallyinthe economy,in decision-making, and in social, cultural and civil life2.
Enakost spolovje enakovredna možnost za ženskein moške, dasodelujejoinsozastopaniv gospodarstvu, odločanju ter družbenem,kulturnemincivilnemživljenju2.
The Commission reports annually on the situation of equality between women and men, disclosing observedtrendsinareas wherethe main gender gaps exist, e.g. rates of employment and pay, sectoral and occupational segregation and the ratio offemale representationin management3.
Komisijaletno poročaostanjuenakosti medženskamiin moškimiinrazkriva opaženetrende na področjihz glavnimirazlikami medspoloma, npr.stopnjazaposlenostiin plače,razlikovanje pospoluvsek-torjihin poklicih ter delež zastopanosti žensk v upravi3.
Figure 1illustrates the change over time of the gap between male andfemaleemploymentrates.
V diagramu 1je ponazorjeno postopnospreminjanjerazlikevstopnjah zaposlenosti moškihinžensk.
Whilstthereisa gapinall Member States, it narrowed for the majority of the EU-27 countries between 2001 and 2007.
Medtemkorazlika obstajavvseh državahčlanicah,sejevvečini držav EU-27 medletoma 2001in 2007 zmanjšala.
ABSOLUTE GENDER GAPIN EMPLOYMENT RATES(WOMEN AND MEN AGED 15–64)IN EU MEMBER STATES 2001 AND 2007(DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE EMPLOYMENT RATES)
ABSOLUTNA RAZLIKA MED SPOLOMA PRI STOPNJI ZAPOSLENOSTI (ŽENSKEIN MOŠKI V STAROSTI 15–64 LET) V DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH EU V LETIH 2001IN 2007(RAZLIKA V STOPNJI ZAPOSLENOSTI MOŠKIH IN ŽENSK)
Percentagepoints
Odstotki
Source: Eurostat, EU Labour Force Survey (LFS), annual averages, EU-27.NB:In all countries the employment rate for men was higher than the one for women.
Vir: Eurostat, Raziskava o delovni sili v EU (EU Labour Force Survey), letna povprečja, EU-27.Opomba: Stopnja zaposlenosti moških je bila v vseh državah višja od stopnje zaposlenosti žensk.
For the 2000–06 programme period, a dual approach to the use of ESFfundsfor the attainment of equality objectives was adopted.
Za programsko obdobje 2000–2006je bil sprejet dvojni pristop za uporabo sredstev ESS pri doseganjuciljevenakosti.
It combined specific actions with what is known as ’gender mainstreaming’.
Pri njemso bile posebne dejavnostizdruženestakoimenovano „integracijo načelaenakostispolov“.
This is ’the process of assessing the implications for women or men of any planned action,includinglegislation, policies or programmes,in all areas and at alllevels5’.
Toje postopek ocenjevanja posledic,ki jihima za ženske ali moške vsaka načrtovana dejavnost, vključno z zakonodajo, politikami ali programi na vseh področjihin na vseh ravneh5.
Reported under code 25 of the classification of interventions laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 438/2001 regarding the management and control systems for assistance granted under the Structural Funds (OJ L 63, 3.3.2001, p. 21).
kategorizacije po področjih pomoči, kot je določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES) št. 438/2001 glede sistemov upravljanja in nadzora pomoči, dodeljene v okviru Strukturnih skladov (UL L 63, 3.3.2001, str. 21).
Forthe 2007–13 programme period,the budgetforspecificactions has decreasedsignificantlyrelative tothe previous periodas moreemphasis has been placed upon mainstreaming.
Proračun za posebne dejavnosti seje za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 v primerjavi s prejšnjim obdobjem močno zmanjšal, ker je bil večji poudarek namenjenintegraciji načela enakosti.
code for expenditure on vocational training actions for women.
V okviru pozitivnih dejavnostizaženske natrgu delasejetreba odločati,kako bise najboljeizboljšaloenakost medspoloma na trgu dela.Poenistranise usposabljanještejeza uspešnole,če običajno privede dostvarne možnostiza pridobitevzaposlitve, zato pa mora biti usposabljanje, ki so galjudje deležni, povezano z obstoječimi razmerami na trgu dela, kotje opazno pomanjkanje določenega znanja.
Therefore the total amount dedicated can only be estimated on the basis of the information provided by the Member States audited.
Po drugi strani pa pri ženskah kot potecialnih uslužbenkah obstajajo posebnezahteve,kotso ustreznovarstvo otrokin prožne oblike dela.
In the context of positivelabour market actions for women, choices haveto be madeabout how besttoimprove genderequality inthelabour market.
Takšna vprašanja so pomembna, če naj pozitivne dejavnosti dosežejo ciljeizboljšanein povečane udeležbe žensk v delovnisili.
RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THEIMPLEMENTATION OF CO-FINANCED ACTIONS
ODGOVORNOSTI ZAIZVAJANJE SOFINANCIRANIH DEJAVNOSTI
The basic process as described is
Opisani osnovni proces
Figure 2 sets outin simplified terms the programming and certain aspects of theimplementation process of ESF-co-financed actions applicable for any ESF-co-financed measure.
V diagramu 2so poenostavljeno predstavljeni programsko načr-tovanjein določenividikiizvajalskega procesa dejavnosti,sofi- se uporablja pri vseh ukrepih, sofinanciranih iz ESS.
inthe area of vocationaltrainingfor women8
nanciranihiz ESS, na področju poklicnega usposabljanja žensk8
Projects cofinanced bythe ESF areimplementedthrough multiannual programmes(which can take theform of operational pro-grammes(OPs) or single programming documents(SPDs)).
Projekti, sofinanciraniiz ESS, seizvajajo prek večletnih programov (ki solahko v obliki operativnih programov ali enotnih programskih dokumentov).
These programmescontainestablished priorities,foreach of whicha number of measures are defined.
Ti programi vsebujejo ugotovljene prednostne naloge,zavsako odkaterihje opredeljenihveč ukrepov.
Measures may include vocational training actionsfor women.
Ukrepi lahko vsebujejo dejavnosti za poklicno usposabljanje žensk.
The programmes are drawn up bythe Member Statesfollowing a consultation process with the Commission(Employment DG) and regional,localand othercompetent publicauthorities,andthe economic and social partners.
Programe sestavijo države članice po posvetovanju s Komisijo (GD zazaposlovanje),regionalnimi,lokalnimiin drugimi pristojnimi javnimi organi ter gospodarskimiin socialnimi partnerji. Komisija oceniin odobri programe.
A key elementin this preparation, andin particularin the setting out of objectives andthe allocation offinancialresourcestothe priorities and measures,is an ex-ante evaluation of the strengths, weaknessesand potential ofthe Member State,region orsector concerned.
Ključni del teh priprav, zlasti pri določanju ciljevin dodeljevanju finančnih sredstev za prednostne nalogein ukrepe,je predhodno vrednotenje prednosti, slabostiin potenciala zadevne države članice, regije ali sektorja.
Thisis the responsibility of authorities designated by the Member States and one of its aims is to asses the appropriateness of the strategy and targets selected given the specific situation oftheregions or areasinvolved.
Za to so odgovorni organi, kijih določijo države članice, eden od namenov pa je oceniti primernost izbranih strategijein ciljev glede na konkretne razmere v zadevnih regijah ali na zadevnih področjih.
Member States are responsible forimplementing the programmes and,in cooperation withthe Commission,they must ensurethat Community funds are used in keeping with the principles of sound financial management.
Državečlanicesoodgovornezaizvajanjeprogramovin mora-jovsodelovanjus Komisijozagotoviti, dasesredstva Skupnosti uporabljajovskladuz načeli dobregafinančnega poslovodenja.
The Commissionretains overallresponsi-bilityforimplementation ofthe budget.
Komisija ohrani končno odgovornost zaizvrševanje proračuna.
WHO DOES WHAT?
KAJ KDO DELA?
9 For more information, see Special Report No 1/2007 concerning the implementation of the mid-term processes on the Structural Funds 2000–06
Za več informacij glej Posebno poročilo št. 1/2007 o izvajanju vmesnih postopkov za strukturne sklade v obdobju 2000–2006 (UL C 124, 5.6.2007).
Individual projectsare proposed by project promoters — who areconsideredas beingthe beneficiariesinthecontext ofre-ceiving ESFsupportfor organisingtraining —andapproved by designated national, regional orlocal authorities.
Posamezne projekte predlagajo nosilci projekta, ki v okviru prejemanja podpore ESS za organiziranje usposabljanjaštejejokot upravičenci, odobrijo pajih za to določeni nacionalni, regionalni alilokalni organi.
The promoters aretasked with providingthecompetent managingauthorities with monitoring information on project progress and the achievement of objectives.
Nosilci morajo pristojnim organom upravljavljanja zagotovitiinformacije o spremljanju napredka projektain doseganjuciljev.
The Commissionis provided with aggregated monitoring data on an annual basis.
Komisijiseletnozagotovijozdruženi podatki ospremljanju.
Fortheprogrammeperiod2000–06,a mid-termevaluationof each programme had to be carried out by anindependent assessor, undertheresponsibility ofthe managing authorities andin cooperation with the Commission.
Za programsko obdobje2000–2006je moral neodvisni ocenjevalec pod odgovornostjo organov upravljanjain v sodelovanju s Komisijoizvesti vmesno vrednotenje vsakega programa.
Someimportantitems forming part ofthe evaluation were:
Nekateri pomembni deli vrednotenjaso bili:
(b)an assessment ofthe continuingrelevance ofthestrategy;
(b)ocena, alijestrategijaše vednorelevantna;
(c) an assessment ofthe quantification of objectives;
(c) ocena količinske opredelitve ciljev;
(d)an evaluation of effectiveness, efficiencyandlikelyimpact; and
(d)vrednotenje uspešnosti, učinkovitostiinverjetnega učinka ter
(e) an appraisal of the quality ofimplementation and monitoring arrangements.
(e) ocena kakovostiizvajanjain ureditev zaspremljanje.
The mid-termevaluationfoundthattheanalysisofefficiency, effectivenessandlikelyimpact had been hampered bythelate orslowstart-up of many programmes,asfew outputs orresults wereavailable by mid-2003.
Pri vmesnem vrednotenjuje bilo ugotovljeno, daje analizo učinkovitosti, uspešnostiin verjetnega učinka oviral pozen ali poča-senzačetek mnogih programov,sajje bilo dosredineleta 2003 na voljo maloizložkov alirezultatov.
Problems with monitoringsystems which failed to provide complete or reliable data were also high-lighted9.
Opozorjenoje bilotudi na težave s sistemi spremljanja, ki niso zagotavljali celovitih ali zanesljivih podatkov9.
Inaddition,Communitystructuralassistanceissubjecttoan ex-post evaluation ofthe utilisation oftheresources andthe effectiveness and efficiency ofthe assistance granted.
Poleg tega se za strukturno pomoč Skupnosti izvaja naknadno vrednotenje porabe sredstev ter uspešnostiin učinkovitosti odobrene pomoči.
This evalu-ation,to becarried out byindependentexperts, underthere-sponsibility of the Commission,in collaboration with the Member Statesand managementauthorities, hasamongst otherthings toconsiderthesuccessorfailureofimplementationandthe achievements andresults.
Pritem vrednotenju, ki ga pod odgovornostjo Komisije ter v sodelovanju z državami članicamiin organi upravljanja izvedejoneodvisnistrokovnjaki,jetreba meddrugimpreučiti uspeh ali neuspehizvajanja, dosežkeinrezultate.
For the 2000–06 programme period, 75 % of ’positive labour market actions for women’ implemented were specific actions in the area of vocational training.
Za obdobje 2000–2006 so 75 %izvedenih pozitivnih dejavnosti za ženske na trgu dela predstavljale posebne dejavnosti na področju poklicnega usposabljanja.
The objective of the Court’s audit was to establishthe extentto which ESF-co-financed vocational trainingactionsfor women were welltargetedandadequately monitored.It addressedthefollowing questions:
Cilj revizije, kijojeizvedlo Sodišče,je bilugotoviti,vkakšnemobseguso bile dejavnostiza poklicno usposabljanje žensk, sofinanciraneiz ESS, dobro ciljno usmerjene inustreznospremljane.Prirevizijistaseobravnavali naslednji vprašanji:
(a) were vocationaltraining actionsfor women selected accord-ingto a clear analysis oflabour market priorities?
(a) ali so bile dejavnosti za poklicno usposabljanje ženskizbrane glede najasno analizo prednostnih nalog natrgu delain
(b)was monitoringinformation sufficient to allow an assessment of whethersuch actions had achievedtheir objectives?
(b)alisoinformacijeospremljanjuzadoščalezaoceno,aliso takšne dejavnosti doseglesvoje cilje.
The audit was carried out atthe Commission andinfive Member States(Germany,Spain,France,Italyandthe United Kingdom) who were amongst thelargest recipients of ESF money disbursed under the heading ’positive labour market actions for women’, in total accountingfor 76 % of the expenditure of the EU-25.
Revizija je bila izvedena v Komisiji in v petih državah članicah (Nemčija,Španija,Francija, Združeno kraljestvo in Italija), ki so bile med največjimi prejemnicami sredstev ESS, razdeljenih v okviru postavke pozitivne dejavnostizaženskenatrgu dela,karje skupaj predstavljalo 76 % odhodkov EU-25.
Within each Member State, one programme wasselectedaccordingto the relative importance of vocational training activities in the measure,infourcases75 %orgreater.Fiveprogrammes were audited:Sachsen-Anhalt(Germany), Andalusia(Spain),Scotland (United Kingdom) and Lombardy (Italy), with the Ile-de-France regionselectedfor France10.
V vsaki državi članici je bilizbran en program,in sicer glede na relativno pomembnost aktivnosti poklicnega usposabljanjav ukrepu,kije bilavštirih primerih 75 %aliveč. Revidiranihje bilo pet programov:Saška-Anhalt(Nemčija), Andaluzija(Španija), Škotska(Združeno kraljestvo) in Lombardija (Italija), v Franciji pa je bila izbrana regija Ile-de-France10.
Itisestimatedthatthefive programmescontained490 million euroofearmarkedfinancing,thatis12 %oftotalspendingon ’positive labour market actions for women’.
Po oceni je 5 programov vsebovalo 490 milijonov EUR namenskega financiranja, karje 12 % skupne porabe za pozitivne dejavnosti za ženske na trgu dela.
Within this amount approximately 380 million euro was allocated to vocational training actions.
V okviru tega zneskaje bilo približno 380 milijonov EUR dodeljenih dejavnostim za poklicno usposabljanje.
Eight projects percountry wereselectedfor on-the-spotaudit, based upon a combination offinancial significance and coverage of project types financed by the measure.
Za revizijo na kraju samem je bilo na podlagi kombinacije finančne pomembnostiin pokritosti različnih vrst projektov, ki se financira-joiz ukrepa,izbranih 8 projektov na državo.
The projects audited can beconsideredas being bothtypical oftheir programmeand of other programmesfalling underthe heading of vocationaltrain-ing actionsfor women.
Revidirane projekteje mogoče šteti kot značilne za svoj programin za druge programe, kispadajo med dejavnosti za poklicno usposabljanje žensk.
Thereview oftheselection process andthe analysis of monitor-inginformation wascarriedoutattheauthoritiesresponsible forimplementing the programmes and by way of the on-the-spot audits of projects.
Pregledizbirnega procesain analizainformacij o spremljanju sta bila izvedena pri organih, odgovornih za izvajanje programov, in prekrevizij projektov na krajusamem.
WERE VOCATIONAL TRAINING ACTIONS FOR WOMEN APPROPRIATELY SELECTED?
JE BILAIZBIRA DEJAVNOSTI ZA POKLICNO USPOSABLJANJE ŽENSK PRIMERNA?
Article 41(2)(c) of Council
Člen 41(2)(c) Uredbe Sveta (ES)
In order to establish priorities for the 2000–06 programme period, the Member States hadtocarry outex-anteevaluations,aimed at demonstratingtheappropriateness oftheirselectedstrategy andjustifying the proposed allocation of financial resources.
Zaradi določanja prednostnih nalog za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 so morale države članiceizvesti predhodna vrednotenja, da bi dokazale primernoststrategije,kisojoizbrale,in upravičile predlagano dodelitev finančnih sredstev.
This means that theidentification of training as a priority and the ob-jectivesto beachievedthroughtrainingshould be based upon theskill needsandtrainingand other demands emanatingfrom thelabour market.
To pomeni, da bi morala opredelitev usposabljanjakot prednostne nalogeinciljev,ki bi jih moralo usposabljanje doseči,temeljiti na potrebah po znanju in usposobljenostiter drugih zahtevah natrgu dela.
Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p.
št. 1260/1999 z dne 21. junija 1999 o splošnih določbah o Strukturnih skladih (UL L 161, 26.6.1999, str.
1), which specifically requires for an evaluation of the situation in terms of equality between men and women with regard to labour market opportunities and treatment at work, including the specific constraints on each group; an estimate of the expected impact of the strategy and assistance, particularly, on the integration of women and men into the labour market, on education and vocational training, on the establishment of women in business and on the reconciliation of family and working life.
1), ki izrecno zahteva vrednotenje stanja glede enakosti med moškimi in ženskami, kar zadeva možnosti na trgu dela in obravnavanje na delu, vključno s specifičnimi omejitvami za vsako skupino, oceno pričakovanega vpliva strategije in pomoči, zlasti na vključevanje žensk in moških na trg dela, na izobraževanje in poklicno usposabljanje, na uveljavljanje žensk v poslu ter na usklajevanje poklicnega in družinskega življenja.
‘The ex-ante evaluation of the
Strategija, kije bila nazadnjeizbra-na,iniz njeizhajajoče programske prednostne naloge so morale biti skladne z analizo, kije bila del predhodnega vrednotenja.
Document aimed at national, regional or local authorities in charge of programming the 2000–06 Community structural interventions.
Dokument je namenjen nacionalnim, regionalnim ali lokalnim organom, zadolženim za programsko načrtovanje strukturnih posegov Skupnosti v obdobju 2000–2006.
Appropriateprojectselectionproceduresneededtobeputin place and applied consistently to ensure that the projects selected had training objectives which were consistent with overall programme objectives13.
Vzpostavi ti je bilo treba ustrezne postopke za izbor projektov injih doslednoizvajati, da bisezagotovilo, dasoimeliizbrani projekti cilje usposabljanja, ki so bili skladni s splošnimi cilji pro-grama13.
Consideringthe above,the Court examined whether:
Glede na navedenoje Sodišče preučilo:
No 1260/1999, which specifies that the ex-ante evaluation shall verify the relevance of the selection criteria once it has demonstrated consistency of the measures in the programme with the aims of the corresponding priorities.
13Člen 41(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999, ki določa, da se s predhodnim vrednotenjem preveri ustreznost izbirnih meril, zatem ko se je prikazalo usklajenost ukrepov v programu z nameni ustreznih
duringthe establishment ofthe programmes,ananalysis of thevariouslabour markets had beencarried out bythere-gionalor Member State authorities concerned and the objectives underlyingthespecificvocationaltrainingactions audited were establishedinlight ofsuch an appraisal; and
ali so zadevni regionalni organi ali organi države članice med vzpostavljanjemprogramovizvedlianalizorazličnihtrgov delainaliso bilicilji, povezanisspecifičnimirevidiranimi dejavnostmi za poklicno usposabljanje, opredeljeni glede na takšno ocenoter
(b)theselection of both projectsand participants were based upon criteria establishedin accordance with prioritiesidenti-fiedin the relevantlabour market and the programme objec-tivesset.
(b)alijeizbor tako projektov kot udeležencev temeljil na merilih, določenih v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami, opredeljenimi na zadevnemtrgu dela,in z opredeljenimi programskimi cilji.
OBJECTIVES NOT BASED UPON THE ANALYSES
CILJI NISO TEMELJILI NA ANALIZAH
The analyseslistedthe main barriersfor women entering the labour market and presented ’gender gaps’ in several important areas such as numbers working,rates ofself-employment, occupancy of decision-makingroles andlabour marketsegregation.
V analizah so bile navedene glavne ovire za ženske, ki vstopajo na trg dela,in predstavljene „razlike med spoloma“ na več pomembnih področjih, kot so število zaposlenih, stopnje samozaposlitve, zastopanostna položajih nosilcevodločanjainrazlikovanje po spolu natrgu dela.
The main weakness found during the audit, however, was that there was no clearlink between the results of the analyses and the proposed training objectives.
Toda z revizijoje bilo kot glavna slabost ugotovljeno, da nijasne povezave medrezultatianalizin predlaganimiciljiusposablja-nja.
There was no clear rationale developed forthetype of vocationaltraining decided upon norforthe skills orsectors of activitytargeted(see examplesintextbox 1).
Ni bilo nobenejasnoizoblikovane utemeljitve,zakajje bila izbrana določena vrsta poklicnega usposabljanja ali zakajje bilo usposabljanje usmerjeno na določenaznanjaalisektorje dejav-nosti(glej primere v okviru 1).
The measuresdevelopedfollowingtheanalysisprocess mostly comprised broadactions witha general biastowardsthe participation of womenratherthanfocused actionstakinginto account the wayin which genderequalitycould best beadvancedinthe specific labour markets concerned.
Ukrepi, ki so bilirazviti po procesu analiziranja, so večinoma vsebovali širše dejavnosti, ki so se na splošno nagibale k udeležbi žensk, ne pa osredotočenih dejavnosti, pri katerih bi se upoštevalo, kako bi bilo nakonkretnihzadevnihtrgih dela mogoče najbolje spodbuditi enakost med spoloma.