natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT 2005 kg606791inside_EN.indd 3
EVROPSKI VARUH ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC LETNO POROČILO 2005 kg606808inside_SL.indd 3
Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permimed provided that the source isacknowledged.
Razmnoževanje v izobraževalne in nekomercialne namene je dovoljeno, Ïe je naveden vir.
All photographs, excluding those on the cover and unless otherwise indicated, are copyright of the European Ombudsman.
Vse fotografije, razen fotografije na naslovnici, in Ïe ni drugaÏe oznaÏeno, so predmet avtorskih pravic Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic.
The full text of the report is published on the internet at:hm p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/report/en/default.htm
PoroÏilo je v celoti objavljeno na spletni strani: hmp://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/report/sl/default.htm p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/report/sl/default.htm
PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER kg606791inside_EN.indd 4
TISKANO NA NEKLORIRANEM PAPIRJU kg606808inside_SL.indd 4
THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT 2005
EVROPSKI VARUH ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC LETNO POROČILO 2005
CELEBRATING 10
PRAZNOVANJE 10.
YEARS 1995 - 2005 kg606791inside_EN.indd 5
OBLETNICE 1995-2005 kg606808inside_SL.indd 5
In accordance with Article 195(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3(8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman’s Duties, I hereby present my Report for the year 2005.
G. predsednik, v skladu s Ïlenom 195(1) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ter Ïlenom 3(8) Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta o predpisih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, vam predstavljam svoje poroÏilo za leto 2005.
Yours sincerely, s
S spoštovanjem!
ANNUAL REPORT 2005
LETNO POROČILO 2005
THE LEGAL BASIS OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK
PRAVNA PODLAGA ZA DELO VARUHA JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
2.2 THE MANDATE OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN 2.2.1 Unauthorised complaints
2.2 PRISTOJNOSTI EVROPSKEGA VARUHA JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC 2.2.1 Nedopustne pritožbe
2.2.2 Community institutions and bodies
2.2.2 Instituc` e in organi Skupnosti
2.2.3 “Maladministration”
2.2.3 „Nepravilnosti“
2.2.4 The European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour
2.2.4 Evropski kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev
ADMISSIBILITY AND GROUNDS FOR INQUIRIES
ANALIZA PRITOŽB, OBRAVNAVANIH V LETU 2005
TRANSFERS AND ADVICE
POSREDOVANJE IN NAPOTITVE
2.6 THE OMBUDSMAN’S PROCEDURES 2.6.1 Starting an inquiry
2.6 POSTOPKI VARUHA JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC 2.6.1 Sprožitev preiskave
2.6.3 Inspection of the files and hearing of witnesses
2.6.3 Pregled spisov in zaslišanje priÏ
2.7 THE OUTCOMES OF INQUIRIES 2.7.1 No maladministration
2.7 IZIDI PREISKAV 2.7.1 Brez nepravilnosti
2.7.2 Cases semled by the institution and friendly solutions
2.7.2 Primeri, ki jih je rešila instituc` a, in sporazumne rešitve
2.7.3 Critical remarks and draW recommendations
2.7.4 Posebna poroÏila Evropskemu parlamentu
2.8 DECISIONS CLOSING CASES IN 2005 2.8.1 Openness, public access and the protection of personal data
2.8 ODLOJBE, S KATERIMI SO BILI ZAKLJUJENI PRIMERI V LETU 2005 2.8.1 Odprtost, javni dostop do podatkov in zašÏita osebnih podatkov
2.8.2 The Commission as guardian of the Treaty
2.8.2 Komis` a kot varuh Pogodbe
2.8.3 Tenders, contracts and grants
2.8.3 Javni razpisi, pogodbe in podpora
DECISIONS FOLLOWING ANINQUIRY
ODLOJBE PO OPRAVLJENIH PREISKAVAH
3.1 CASES WHERE NO MALADMINISTRATION WAS FOUND 3.1.1 The European Commission
3.1 PRIMERI, V KATERIH NISO BILE UGOTOVLJENE NEPRAVILNOSTI 3.1.1 Evropska komis` a
3.1.2 The European Commission and the Council of the European Union 72ALLEGED LACK OF PARKING SPACES FOR DISABLED PEOPLE NEAR COMMISSION AND COUNCIL BUILDINGS ...............................................72
3.1.2 Evropska komis` a in Svet Evropske un`e 68NEZADOSTNO ŠTEVILO PARKIRNIH MEST ZA INVALIDNE OSEBE V BLIŽINI STAVB KOMISL E IN SVETA............................................................68 ............................................................68
3.1.3 The European Personnel Selection OU ce (EPSO)
3.1.3 Evropski urad za izbor osebja (EPSO)
CANDIDATES’ ACCESS TO EVALUATION CRITERIA ..................................................................................................................................................................73ADMISSION TO SELECTION TESTS..................................................................................................................................................................................................74 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................74
DOSTOP KANDIDATOV DO OCENJEVALNIH MERIL ................................................................................................................................................................69SPREJEM NA IZBIRNE TESTE.............................................................................................................................................................................................................70 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................70
3.1.4 The European Central Bank 74INFORMATION CONCERNING A POSSIBLE INTERVENTION BY THE ECB..........................................................................................................................74 ..........................................................................................................................74
3.1.4 Evropska centralna banka (ECB) 70PODATKI O MOREBITNEM POSEGU ECB.......................................................................................................................................................................................70 .......................................................................................................................................................................................70
3.2.1 The European Parliament 75TRANSFER OF PENSION RIGHTS......................................................................................................................................................................................................75 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................75
3.2.1 Evropski parlament 71PRENOS POKOJNINSKIH PRAVIC....................................................................................................................................................................................................71 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................71
3.2.2 The Council of the European Union 76TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT AT EU POLICE MISSION.............................................................................................................................76
3.2.2 Svet Evropske un`e 72PRENEHANJE POGODBE O ZAPOSLITVI PRI POLICLSKI MISLI EU.......................................................................................................................................72 .......................................................................................................................................72
UNJUSTIFIED DELAY AND FAILURE TO REPLY TO PUBLIC ACCESS REQUEST ..................................................................................................................77REFUSAL OF A REQUEST FOR ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS ..........................................................................................................................................................77REIMBURSEMENT OF TRAVEL AND ACCOMMODATION EXPENSES ...................................................................................................................................78REIMBURSEMENT OF TRAVEL EXPENSES .....................................................................................................................................................................................78ALLEGED LATE PAYMENTS TO COMMISSION EVALUATORS.................................................................................................................................................78 .................................................................................................................................................78
NEUPRAVIJENA ZAMUDA PRI ODGOVORU IN ZAHTEVA ZA DOSTOP JAVNOSTI, NA KATERO NI BILO ODGOVORA ....................................72ZAVRNITEV ZAHTEVE ZA DOSTOP DO DOKUMENTOV .........................................................................................................................................................73POVRAJILO POTNIH STROŠKOV IN STROŠKOV NAMESTITVE .............................................................................................................................................73POVRAJILO POTNIH STROŠKOV .....................................................................................................................................................................................................74DOMNEVNA ZAPOZNELA PLAJILA OCENJEVALCEM KOMISL E .........................................................................................................................................74
FRIENDLY SOLUTIONS ACHIEVED BY THE OMBUDSMAN
SPORAZUMNE REŠITVE, KI JIH JE DOSEGEL EVROPSKI VARUH JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
3.3.1 The European Parliament
PRIMERI, ZAKLJUJENI S KRITIJNO OCENO EVROPSKEGA VARUHA JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
ACCESS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT’S PREMISES ..........................................................................................................................................................79REIMBURSEMENT OF LEGAL COSTS ...............................................................................................................................................................................................80PROVISION OF INFORMATION IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES DURING AN ELECTION CAMPAIGN...........................................................................81 ...........................................................................81
3.4.2 Svet Evropske un`e 81DOSTOP DO DOKUMENTOV O SKUPNI ZUNANJI IN VARNOSTNI POLITIKI....................................................................................................................81 ....................................................................................................................81
3.4.4 The European Anti-Fraud OU ce (OLAF) 97LACK OF INDICATION BY OLAF OF LIKELY LENGTH OF INQUIRY......................................................................................................................................97 ......................................................................................................................................97
3.4.4 Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) 90NENAVEDBA PREDVIDENEGA TRAJANJA PREISKAVE URADA OLAF................................................................................................................................90 ................................................................................................................................90
E-MAIL CORRESPONDENCE WITH AN APPLICANT FOR A JOB ..............................................................................................................................................97HANDLING OF A REQUEST FOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION BY THE EIB...........................................................................................................................98 ...........................................................................................................................98
E-POŠTNA KORESPONDENCA S PROSILCEM ZA ZAPOSLITEV ..............................................................................................................................................90ZAVRNITEV ZAHTEVE ZA DOSTOP DO INFORMACL, NASLOVLJENE NA EIB.................................................................................................................91 .................................................................................................................91
3.5.1 The European Commission
3.5 OSNUTKI PRIPOROJIL, KI SO JIH INSTITUCLE SPREJELE 3.5.1 Evropska komis` a
AGE LIMITS IN TRAINEESHIP PROGRAMME ...............................................................................................................................................................................99CANCELLATION OF A FINANCIAL COMMITMENT ...................................................................................................................................................................99SELECTION OF PUPILS FOR THE EUROPEAN SCHOOLS ........................................................................................................................................................100ACCESS TO A DOCUMENT ORIGINATING FROM A MEMBER STATE IN THE EXCESSIVE DEFICIT PROCEDURE...................................................101
STAROSTNA OMEJITEV V PROGRAMIH PRAKSE ........................................................................................................................................................................92PREKLIC FINANJNIH OBVEZNOSTI ...............................................................................................................................................................................................92IZBIRANJE DLAKOV ZA EVROPSKE ŠOLE .....................................................................................................................................................................................93DOSTOP DO DOKUMENTOV DRŽAVE JLANICE V POSTOPKU JEZMERNEGA PRIMANJKLJAJA..............................................................................94 ..............................................................................94
3.5.2 The European Anti-Fraud OU ce (OLAF) 102MISLEADING INFORMATION IN PRESS REVIEW......................................................................................................................................................................102 ......................................................................................................................................................................102
3.5.2 Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) 94ZAVAJAJOJE INFORMACL E V TISKOVNEM POVZETKU ........................................................................................................................................................94
3.6 CASES CLOSED FOR OTHER REASONS 3.6.1 The European Commission
3.6 PRIMERI, ZAKLJUJENI IZ DRUGIH RAZLOGOV 3.6.1 Evropska komis` a
ARTICLE 226 COMPLAINT CONCERNING PENSION TRANSFER ..........................................................................................................................................103ARTICLE 226 COMPLAINT IN A CASE PENDING BEFORE A NATIONAL SUPREME COURT .........................................................................................103FREE LENDING OF BOOKS FROM PUBLIC LIBRARIES.............................................................................................................................................................104 .............................................................................................................................................................104
PRITOŽBE PO JLENU 226 O PRENOSU POKOJNINE ...................................................................................................................................................................95PRITOŽBA PO JLENU 226 V PRIMERU PRED NACIONALNIM VRHOVNIM SODIŠJEM ..................................................................................................96BREZPLAJNA IZPOSOJA KNJIG V JAVNIH KNJIŽNICAH.........................................................................................................................................................96 .........................................................................................................................................................96
CASES CLOSED AFTER A SPECIAL REPORT
PRIMERI, ZAKLJUJENI PO POSEBNEM POROJILU
3.7.1 The Council of the European Union 105FAILURE TO GIVE VALID REASONS FOR CONTINUING TO LEGISLATE BEHIND CLOSED DOORS...........................................................................105 ...........................................................................105
3.7.1 Svet Evropske un`e 97POMANJKANJE UTEMELJENIH RAZLOGOV ZA NADALJNJE ODLOJANJE ZA ZAPRTIMI VRATI..............................................................................97 ..............................................................................97
3.7.2 The European Commission 105EDUCATIONAL COSTS FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS ............................................................................................................105
3.7.2 Evropska komis` a 98STROŠKI ZA IZOBRAŽEVANJE OTROK S POSEBNIMI UJNIMI POTREBAMI.......................................................................................................................98 .......................................................................................................................98
3.7.3 The European Anti-Fraud OU ce (OLAF) 106PROVISION OF INCORRECT AND MISLEADING INFORMATION TO THE OMBUDSMAN DURING A PREVIOUS INQUIRY...............................106 ...............................106
3.7.3 Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) 98POSREDOVANJE NEPRAVILNIH IN ZAVAJAJOJIH INFORMACL VARUHU JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC V PREDHODNI PREISKAVI .....................98
OWN-INITIATIVE INQUIRY BY THE OMBUDSMAN
PREISKAVE NA LASTNO POBUDO VARUHA JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
THE EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR
EVROPSKI NADZORNIK ZA VARSTVO PODATKOV
THE EUROPEAN NETWORK OF OMBUDSMEN
EVROPSKO OMREŽJE VARUHOV JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
OTHER OMBUDSMAN SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES
DRUGI SEMINARJI IN KONFERENCE VARUHA JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
OTHER EVENTS WITH OMBUDSMEN AND THEIR STAFF
DRUGI DOGODKI Z VARUHI JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC IN NJIHOVIMI USLUŽBENCI 117
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR
VRHUNCI LETA
6.2 INFORMATION VISITS
6.2 OBISKI, NAMENJENI OBVEŠJANJU
MEDIA RELATIONS
ELEKTRONSKO KOMUNICIRANJE
PERSONNEL
ZAPOSLENI
INDICES OF DECISIONS
SEZNAM ODLOJB
THE ELECTION OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
IZVOLITEV EVROPSKEGA VARUHA JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
HOW TO CONTACT THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
KAKO STOPITI V STIK Z EVROPSKIM VARUHOM JLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
The institution of the European Ombudsman celebrated its tenth anniversary in 2005.
Instituc` a Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic je leta 2005 praznovala svojo deseto obletnico.
This important milestone gave us an opportunity to reflect on the achievements of the first ten years and to chart the optimal course of action for the future in cooperation with our key interlocutors.
Ta pomembni mejnik je bil priložnost za razmislek o dosežkih prvih desetih let in za doloÏitev optimalnega prihodnjega delovanja v sodelovanju z našimi kljuÏnimi sogovorniki.
The range of events we organised provided us with rich insights into what was working well and what more could be done in terms of our relations with European Union (EU) institutions and bodies, the ombudsman community, and complainants and citizens more generally.
Dogodki, ki smo jih organizirali, so nam pokazali, kaj deluje dobro in kaj je treba izboljšati v smislu naših odnosov z instituc`ami in organi Evropske un`e (EU), s skupnostjo varuha Ïlovekovih pravic ter pritožniki in državljani na splošno.
But before going into depth on the various ideas that surfaced, let me first devote some thoughts to the work of the institution over the past ten years.
Pred poglobljeno analizo razliÏnih idej, ki so se pojavile, pa naj se najprej posvetim delu instituc` e v zadnjih desetih letih.
Since September 1995, the European Ombudsman has handled over 20 000 complaints and helped countless more citizens by answering their requests for information.
Od septembra 1995 je Evropski varuh Ïlovekovih pravic obravnaval veÏ kot 20 000 pritožb, še veliko veÏ državljanom pa pomagal tako, da je odgovoril na njihove zahteve po informac`ah.
Upon leaving oUce, my predecessor, the first European Ombudsman, Mr Jacob SÖDERMAN, could cite, as a major achievement, the degree to which the various EU institutions and bodies were willing to work with him to resolve citizens’ complaints.
Potem ko je moj predhodnik, g. Jacob SÖDERMAN, konÏal mandat prvega evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, je kot najveÏji dosežek lahko navedel stopnjo, do katere so razliÏne instituc` e in organi EU bili pripravljeni sodelovati z njim pri reševanju pritožb državljanov.
From the abolition of age limits in recruitment to improvements in the area of late payment, and from greater access to documents to growing respect for the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the institutions and bodies demonstrated that they were keen to co-operate with the Ombudsman in improving service to citizens.
Instituc` e in organi so z odpravo starostnih omejitev pri zaposlovanju, izboljšavami na podroÏju zapoznelih plaÏil, boljšim dostopom do dokumentov in vedno veÏjim upoštevanjem Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah pokazali, da so pripravljeni na sodelovanje z varuhom Ïlovekovih pravic pri izboljšanju storitev za državljane.
For these accomplishments and, indeed, for many others, we, as citizens of the Union, are forever indebted to Jacob SÖDERMAN.
Zaradi teh in številnih drugih dosežkov bomo kot državljani Un`e za vedno hvaležni Jacobu SÖDERMANU.
Beyond working to improve the Union’s administration, the institution of the European Ombudsman has made great eTorts to develop relations with national, regional and local ombudsmen throughout the Union with a view to ensuring that rights for citizens and residents under EU law, including fundamental rights, become a reality.
Poleg prizadevanj za izboljšanje upravljanja Un`e si je Evropski varuh Ïlovekovih pravic zelo prizadeval za razv`anje odnosov z nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi varuhi Ïlovekovih pravic po vsej Un`i, da bi tako pravice državljanov in prebivalcev v okviru zakonodaje EU, vkljuÏno s temeljnimi pravicami, postale realnost.
This cooperation takes place, for the most part, under the aegis of the European Network of Ombudsmen, which has been built up over the past decade into an invaluable mechanism for dealing promptly and eT ectively with citizens’ complaints.
To sodelovanje v veÏini poteka pod okriljem Evropske mreže varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic, ki je v zadnjih desetih letih postala neprecenljiv mehanizem za hitro in uÏinkovito obravnavo pritožb državljanov.
The year 2005 gave us the opportunity to take stock of the achievements of the Network since it was established in Strasbourg in 1996 and to determine how to move forward together.
Leto 2005 je bilo priložnost za oceno dosežkov mreže od njene vzpostavitve v Strasbourgu leta 1996 in za doloÏitev, kako skupaj nadaljevati.
The success of these initiatives can be seen in the fact that over 300 complaints are now submimed to the Ombudsman every month, with the year 2005 seeing the highest ever number of complaints received.
Uspeh teh pobud je razviden iz dejstva, da se varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic vsak mesec predloži veÏ kot 300 pritožb, pri Ïemer je leta 2005 prispelo najveÏ pritožb doslej.
It would of course be much bemer if citizens never needed to contact the European Ombudsman and if their complaints were resolved at the earliest possible stage by the administration implicated in the complaint.
Seveda bi bilo veliko bolje, Ïe se državljanom ne bi bilo treba obrniti na Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic in Ïe bi njihove pritožbe v najkrajšem možnem Ïasu razrešila uprava, vpletena v pritožbo.
Citizens do not mind who solves their problem.
Državljanom je vseeno, kdo reši njihovo težavo.