natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Public Health Programme (PHP) for 2003–07 aimed at complementing the measures taken by Member States to protect and improvepublichealth.Itwasstructured aroundthreeprogrammestrands:‘health information’,rapidreactionto‘health threats’andhealthpromotionthrough addressing‘health determinants’.
Cilj programa javnega zdravja (PJZ) za obdobje 2003–2007 je bil dopolnjevati ukrepe, ki jih sprejmejo države članice za varovanje in izboljšanje javnega zdravja. Oblikovan je bil okolitrehsklopovprograma:„zdravstvene informacije“,hiterodzivna„nevarnostiza zdravje“ in spodbujanje zdravja prek obrav-navanja„determinant zdravja“.
During this period the programme awarded grantsto consortia of organisationsforthe implementationofsome352projects,the total Community contribution being approxi -mately 232 million euro.
Vtemobdobjusobilekonzorcijemorga-nizacijizprogramadodeljenedonacijeza izvedbo približno 352 projektov, pri čemer je skupni prispevek Skupnosti znašal približno 232 milijonov EUR.
The Court’s audit asked whethertheright conditions were set for the projects financed from the EU budget to contribute effectively to improving the health of European citizens, as a complement to measurestaken by Member States.
Sodiščeje pri svoji reviziji zastavilo vprašanje, ali so bile vzpostavljene prave razmere, da bi projekti, ki se financirajoiz proračuna EUkotdopolnilokukrepomdržavčlanic, uspešnoprispevalikizboljšanjuzdravja evropskih državljanov.
In particular, the Court examined whether:
Sodišče je zlasti preučilo, ali:
(a)the design of the PHP provided a suitable frameworkfortheeffectiveimplemen-tationand monitoring of Communityfunded health promotion actions;
(a)je zasnova PJZ zagotovila ustrezen okvir za uspešno izvajanje in spremljanje ukrepov za spodbujanje zdravja, ki jih financira Skupnost;
(b) the Commission ensured, at the programme implementation and project selectionstage,thatprojectsfunded underthe‘healthdeterminants’strand of the PHP were likely to achieve sustain-ableresults, werecomplementaryand provided EU added value; and
(b)je Komisija na stopnji izvajanja programa inizboraprojektovzagotovila,dajeza projekte,financiranevokvirusklopa „determinantzdravja“PJZ,verjetno, dadosežejotrajnostnerezultate,dase dopolnjujejoterzagotavljajododano vrednost EU,in
(c) the Commission and project coordinators ensured that projects were managed effectively.
(c) so Komisija in koordinatorji projektov zagotovili uspešno upravljanje projektov.
The Court’s findings and conclusions were asfollows:
Ugotovitve in zaključki Sodišča so bili naslednji:
In view of its findings, the Court recommends thattheprogrammelogicshouldbe made explicitinanysimilarfuturelegislation.
Sodišče glede na svoje ugotovitve priporoča, dasevvsaki podobni prihodnjizakonodaji izrecnoizrazilogika programa.
Where the current programme is concerned, the Commission should undertake a mapping exercise to gain an overview of actions alreadyimplementedandthustoidentify anyremaining gaps.The number ofannual prioritiesshouldbesignificantlyreduced, and they should be focused on strategic topics and activities with an obvious European added value.
Glede sedanjega programa bi Komisija moralazbrati podatke o projektih ter s tem dobiti pregled nadžeizvedenimiukrepiintakougotoviti preostalevrzeli.Številoletnih prednostnih nalog bi bilo treba bistveno zmanjšati ter jih osredotočiti na strateške teme in dejavnosti z očitno evropsko dodano vrednostjo.
The Commission should also address the weaknesses identified in project design andimplementation.
Komisija bi morala tudi obravnavati slabosti, ugotovljene pri zasnoviinizvajanju projektov.
(a) The PHP wassetverybroadandambi-tious objectives that contrasted sharply with the limited means at its disposal.
(a) Cilji PJZ so bili široko in am bi ci o z no zastavljeni, karje bilo v ostrem nasprotju z omejenimi sredstvi, ki so mu bila na voljo.
In such a situation it is essential to focus on what can actually be achieved.
V takšnihrazmerah seje bistveno osredotočitinato,karjedejansko mogoče doseči.
However, theinterventionlogic wasatnopoint made explicit, which was not conducive tosettingclear, meaningfulandlogi-callylinkedobjectivesandspecifying appropriate performanceindicators.
Vendarlogikainterven-cije nikoli ni bila izrecno izražena, kar ni spodbujalo zastavljanja jasnih, smiselnih in logično povezanih ciljev ter določanja primernih kazalnikov uspešnosti.
As aresult,the PHPlacked strategicfocus.
Posle-dičnoje PJZ manjkalastrateška usmeri-tev.„Področijukrepanja“izprograma, določenihvletnihdelovnihnačrtih,je bilovečkotprojektov,kisobilifinan-cirani za obravnavanje teh področij.
Theprogramme’s‘actionareas’estab-lished in the annual work plans outnum-beredtheprojectsfundedtoaddress them.Sinceprojectproposerswere invited to apply for funding under often verygeneralheadings,the multiplicity and diversity of project topics and target groupscausedinputtobedilutedand ledtofragmentedresults.
Ker sobilipredlagateljiprojektovkpro-šnjizafinanciranjepogostopovabljeni podzelosplošniminaslovi,staštevilč-nostinraznolikost projektnihvsebinin ciljnihskupinpovzročilirazvodenitev vložkovterprivedlidorazdrobljenih rezultatov.
Morefundamentally,fortheperiodafter 2013 the Commission and the Member States are invited to reconsider the EU’s funding approach in the field of public health.
(b)Uspešnost projektovso oviraleslabosti v zasnovi in težave pri izvajanju.
Other cooperation mechanisms whichexist,such as the‘open method of coordination’, could befurther developed.
Z nekaj izjemamipriprojektihnibilooprede-ljeno,kakšnerezultatenajbidosegli, zato ni bilo mogoče pokazati, da so imeli kakršenkoliučinek.
(b)Projecteffectiveness washinderedby designweaknessesandimplementa-tionproblems.Withfewexceptions, projectsdidnotdefinewhatresults theyintendedtoachieve,andthere-forewereunabletodemonstratethat theyhadhadanyeffect.Sustainability wasoftenunderstoodbyparticipants asthecontinuationofprojectactivi-tiesand was therefore heavily dependent on continued Community funding.
Udeležencisotraj-nost pogostorazumeli kot nadaljevanje projektnih dejavnosti, zato je bila močno odvisnaodnadaljnjegafinanciranja s strani Skupnosti.
There wasnosystematic monitoringof actions already undertaken in the different priority areas, whichsometimesled to duplication of work.
Ni bilo sistematičnega spremljanja ukrepov, kisose žeizvajali narazličnihprednostnihpodročjih,kar je včasih privedlo do podvajanja dela.
These were the programmes
To so bili programi ukrepov
Article 152 of the EC Treaty sets out the Communities’ role in the field of public health, stating that Community activities are directed towards ‘improvingpublichealth,preventinghumanillnessanddiseases,and obviating sources of danger to human health’.
Vlogo Skupnosti na področju javnega zdravja določa člen 152 pogodbe ES, ki navaja, da so dejavnosti Skupnosti usmerjene k „izboljševanju javnega zdravja, preprečevanju človekovih obolenj in bolezni ter odpravljanju vzrokov, ki ogrožajo zdravje ljudi“.
These Community actions aretocomplement measurestakenatnationallevelandneedto respect the Member States’ responsibilities for the organisation and delivery of healthservices and medical care.
Ti ukrepi Skupnosti dopolnjujejo ukrepe na nacionalni ravni, pri njih pa je treba spoštovati odgovornosti držav članic za organiziranje in zagotavljanje zdravstvenihstoritevin zdravstvenega varstva.
of Community action on cancer, rare diseases, pollutionrelated diseases, AIDS and other communicable diseases, injury prevention, prevention of drug dependence, health monitoring, and health promotion, information, education and training.
Skupnosti o raku, redkih boleznih, boleznih, povezanih z onesnaževanjem, aidsu in drugih nalezljivih boleznih, preprečevanju poškodb, preprečevanju odvisnosti od drog, spremljanju zdravja ter spodbujanju, informiranju, izobraževanju in usposabljanju na področju zdravja.
The Programme Committee acts
Programski odbor deluje kot
The European Commission’s mainroleinthe area of public healthis tofacilitatecooperation between Member State authorities, and to implementincentive measures.
Glavna naloga Evropske komisije na področju javnega zdravja je lajšanje sodelovanja med organi držav članicinizvajanje spodbujevalnih ukrepov.
Apartfromspecificcompetencefor the safety standards of organs, substances of human origin and blood, the EU’s legislative power in this area is limited to incentive measures thatexcludeanyharmonisationofthelawsandregulationsofthe Member States.
Razen posebne pristojnosti za standarde varnosti organov, snovi človeškega izvora in krvi so zakonodajna pooblastila EU na tem področju omejena naspodbujevalne ukrepe,kiizključujejokakršno koli usklajevanje zakonovin predpisov držav članic.
The first Public Health Programme (PHP) was adopted for the 2003–08 period by Decision No 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1 and replaced eight action programmes on specific healthtopics2. The PHP addressedthree general objectives:
Prvi program javnega zdravja (PJZ) je bil sprejet za obdobje 2003–2008 s Sklepom št. 1786/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta1 ter je
(b)to enhancethe capability ofrespondingrapidly andin a coordi-natedfashiontothreatsto health(‘healththreats’strand);
nadomestil osem akcijskih programov za posebne zdravstvene teme PJZ se je posvečaltrem glavnim ciljem:
(c)to promote health and prevent disease through addressing health determinantsacrossallpoliciesandactivities(‘healthdetermi-nants’strand).
(a)izboljšatiinformacijeinznanjezarazvojjavnegazdravja(sklop „zdravstvenihinformacij“);
as the management committee referred to in Articles 4 and 7 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC(OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
(b)okrepiti sposobnost hitrega in usklajenega odzivanja na nevarnosti za zdravje(sklop„nevarnosti za zdravje“); upravljalni odbor iz členov 4 in 7 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES (UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
23) for the annual plan of work for implementing the programme.
23) za letni načrt dela za izvajanje programa.
It oversees the arrangements, criteria and procedures for selecting and financing programme actions, arrangements for implementing joint strategies and actions and evaluating the programme, and certain measures in connection with the coordination of health monitoring and rapid reaction to health threats.
Nadzira ureditve, merila in postopke za izbiranje in financiranje ukrepov programa, ureditve za izvajanje skupnih strategij in ukrepov in za ocenjevanje programa ter določene ukrepe, povezane z usklajevanjem spremljanja zdravja in hitrim odzivom na nevarnosti za zdravje.
Other measures linked to the implementation of the PHP are adopted through the advisory procedure referred to in Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC.
Drugi ukrepi, povezani z izvajanjem PJZ, se sprejmejo prek svetovalnega postopka iz členov 3 in 7 Sklepa 1999/468/ES.
To achieve these objectives, the Commission awarded grants to consortia of organisations (governmental, non-governmental, academia) imple-mentingprojects whichaddressedtheprioritypublichealthissues definedin annual work plans(AWPs) established by the Commission and a committee of Member States’representatives3.
Za doseganje teh ciljev je Komisija dodelila donacije konzorcijem orga-nizacij(vladnih,nevladnihinakademskih),kisoizvajaleprojekte, pri katerih so se obravnavala prednostna vprašanjajavnega zdravja, opredeljena v letnih delovnih načrtih, ki sta jih pripravila Komisija in odbor predstavnikov držav članic3.
Figures for the 2007 call for
Številčni podatki za razpis za
Some 352 projects were funded during this period, with the EC contribution totalling 231,7 mil- proposals are based on the list of accepted proposals.
V tem obdobju je bilo financiranih približno 352 projektov, prispevek ES pa je skupaj znašal 231,7 milijona zbiranje predlogov leta 2007 temeljijo na seznamu sprejetih predlogov.
Negotiations for several contracts were still ongoing as of October 2008.
Pri večjem številu pogodb so pogajanja oktobra 2008 še vedno potekala.
lion euroin commitments4(see Figure 1).
EUR v obveznostih4(glej diagram 1).
The‘health determinants’ strand wasthelargest ofthethreein budgetaryterms, with a Com-munitycontributionof90,8 millioneurocorrespondingto40 %of thetotal amount committedfor projects.
Sklop„determinant zdravja“je bil največja od treh proračunskih postavk, prispevek Skupnosti, kije znašal 90,8 milijona EUR, paje ustrezal 40 % skupnega zneska obve-znosti,sprejetih za projekte.
TOTAL COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTION COMMITMENTS IN MILLION EURO AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL BUDGET AND NUMBER OF PROJECTS PER PROGRAMME STRAND
SKUPNI PRISPEVEK SKUPNOSTI OBVEZNOSTI V MILIJONIH EUR KOT ODSTOTEK SKUPNEGA PRORAČUNA IN ŠTEVILO PROJEKTOV PO SKLOPIH PROGRAMA
Health threats58,8 million euro (25 %)68 projects
Nevarnosti za zdravje58,8 milijona EUR (25 %)68 projektov
Health information82,1 million euro (35 %)135 projects
Zdravstvene informacije82,1 milijona EUR (35 %)135 projektov
Health determinants90,8 million euro (40 %)149 projects
Determinante zdravja90,8 milijona EUR (40 %)149 projektov
Under the PHP, grant agreements were concluded with project coordinators, whoreceivedco-financing of upto60 %(inexceptionalcases up to 80 %) of the costs incurred for carrying out project activities.
V okviru PJZ so bili sklenjeni sporazumi o donacijah s koordinatorji projektov, ki so prejeli sofinanciranje v višini do 60 % (v izjemnih primerih do 80 %) stroškov, nastalih pri izvajanju projektnih dejavnosti.
In addition to grants for projects, a minor part (about 3 %) of the PHP’s operational budget was used for service contracts through tendering procedures.
Poleg donacij za projekte je bil manjši del (približno 3 %) operativnega proračuna PJZ porabljen za naročilastoritev prekrazpisnih postopkov.
Decision No 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 301, 20.11.2007, p. 3).
Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 301, 20.11.2007, str. 3).
Projects funded from the PHP were very diverse in terms of size, approach and target group (see Box 1).
Projekti, financirani iz PJZ, so se močno razlikovali po velikosti, pristopu in ciljni skupini(glej okvir 1).
Consortia varied in size from three to60partners,the Communitycontributionrangedfrom45000to 2,5 million euro, andtypes of project activities differed widely.
V konzorcijih so sodelovali odtrije do 60 partnerjev, prispevek Skupnostije bil med 45 000in 2,5 milijona EUR, vrste projektnih dejavnosti pasose močnorazlikovale.
It had also proposed increasing the budget byaround270 %(804 millioneurofor healthfor2008–13),arguing that the PHP budget for health actions wasinsufficienttorespond tothe Treaty obligation of counteringthreatsto health7
270 % (804 milijone EUR za zdravje za obdobje 2008–2013), z utemeljitvijo, da proračun PJZzazdravstvene ukrepe nezadoščaza odziv na obveznostiz Pogodbe o preprečevanju nevarnosti za zdravje7
However, following the interinstitutional agreement of 17 May 2006 on the2007–13financialframework,neitherthe mergerofthehealth and consumer protection programmes nor the increased budget was accepted bythe European Parliament andthe Council.
Vendar po medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006 o finanč-nemokviruzaobdobje2007–2013Evropski parlament in Svet nista sprejela niti združitve programa javnega zdravja in programa varstva potrošnikov niti povečanja proračuna.
The outcome of the legislative process was a second health programme with similar objectives and activities to the PHP, but a reduced budget of 322 mil-lioneuro,about9 %perannumlessthanthatofthepredecessor programme(see Box 2).
Rezultatzakonodajnega procesa je bil drugi program zdravja s podobnimi cilji in dejavnostmi kot PJZ, vendar z zmanjšanim proračunom v višini 322 milijonov EUR, kar je približno 9 % manj kot pri predhodnem programu(glej okvir 2).
PHP ‘HEALTH DETERMINANTS’ STRAND EXAMPLES OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES
PJZ SKLOP „DETERMINANT ZDRAVJA“ PRIMERI PROJEKTNIH DEJAVNOSTI
• Collecting data on falsified prescriptions as an indicator of drug abuse.
• Zbiranje podatkov o ponarejenih receptih kot kazalniku zlorabe drog.
• Organising a scientific symposium on the medical side-effects of doping.
• Organizacija znanstvenega simpozija o zdravstvenih stranskih učinkih uporabe nedovoljenih poživil.
• Preparing a report on compliance with alcohol marketing regulations.
• Priprava poročila o skladnosti s predpisi o trženju alkohola.
• Producing and disseminating information material for migrant sex workers.
• Priprava in razširjanje informacijskega gradiva za spolne delavce migrante.
• Organising a competition to promote smoke-free school classes.
• Organizacija tekmovanja za spodbujanje šolskega pouka brez cigaretnega dima.
• Developing national and regional breastfeeding policy and plans.
• Razvoj nacionalnih in regionalnih načrtov in politike v zvezi z dojenjem.
Decision No 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 establishing a second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008–13)
Sklep št. 1350/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o uvedbi drugega programa ukrepov Skupnosti na področju zdravja (2008–2013)
Decision No 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 adopting a programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003–08)
Sklep št. 1786/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. septembra 2002 o sprejetju programa ukrepov Skupnosti na področju javnega zdravja (2003–2008)
• to generate and disseminate health information and knowledge• to improve citizens’ health security• to promote health, including the reduction of health inequalities
• zbirati in širiti zdravstvene informacije in znanje• izboljšati zdravstveno varnost državljanov• spodbujati zdravje, vključno z zmanjšanjem zdravstvenih neenakosti
• to improve information and knowledge for the development of public health• to enhance the capability of responding rapidly and in a coordinated fashion to threats to health• to promote health and prevent disease through addressing health determinants across all policies and activities
• izboljšati informacije in znanje za razvoj javnega zdravja• okrepiti sposobnost hitrega in usklajenega odzivanja na nevarnosti za zdravje• spodbujati zdravje in preprečevati bolezni z obravnavanjem determinant zdravja v vseh politikah in dejavnostih
354 million euro (for 2003–08)8
354 milijonov EUR (za obdobje 2003–2008)8
322 million euro (for 2008–13)i.e. 53,7 million euro p.a. over 6 years i.e. 59 million euro p.a. over 6 years
322 milijonov EUR (za obdobje 2008–2013)tj.
Budget according to programme decision
53,7 milijona EUR letno v 6 letih tj.
Grants for actions
Proračun iz sklepa o programu donacije za ukrepe
Tenders (service contracts)9
Mehanizmi financiranja razpisni postopki (naročila storitev)9 donacije za ukrepeoperativne donacijekonferenceskupni ukrepirazpisni postopki (naročila storitev)
Extended impact assessment (2005)12
Izvajanje programa razširjena ocena učinka (2005)12
There are two main reasons for the difference between the indicative PHP budget given in the programme decision and the figure of 231,7 million euro mentioned in paragraph 5 as committed for projects in 2003–07: the indicative budget included about 58 million euro for 2008 (which was then covered by PHP2), and it also covered expenditure for the Executive Agency.
Glavna razloga za razliko med okvirnim proračunom PJZ iz sklepa o programu in številčnim podatkom 231,7 milijona EUR, ki je naveden v odstavku 5 kot prevzete obveznosti za projekte v obdobju 2003–2007, sta: okvirni proračun je vseboval približno 58 milijonov EUR za leto 2008 (ki je bilo takrat zajeto v PJZ2), pokrival pa je tudi odhodke za izvajalsko agencijo.
A ceiling of 10 % of the operational budget was set in the AWPs for calls for tenders.
Za javne razpise je bila v letnih delovnih načrtih določena zgornja meja v višini 10 % operativnega proračuna. Ta meja se je v PJZ2 zvišala na 20 %.
Agency (PHEA) (fully operational since 1 January 2007).
10 Od leta 2005 sta bila upravljanje donacij in organiziranje javnih razpisov za izbor projektov postopoma prenesena na Izvajalsko agencijo za program javnega zdravja (PHEA) (ta v celoti deluje od 1. januarja 2007).
In 2008 the PHEA was renamed the Executive Agency for Health and
Leta 2008 je bila PHEA preimenovana v Izvajalsko agencijo za zdravje in potrošnike (EAHC).
12 SEC(2005) 0425, annex to the health and consumer protection strategy and programme proposal (COM(2005) 115 final).
12 SEC(2005) 0425, Priloga k strategiji zdravja in varstva potrošnikov in predlogu programa (COM(2005) 115 konč.).
Health promotion actions can be defined as ‘actions which support people to adopt and maintain healthylifestyles, and whichcreatesupportive living conditions (environments) for health’13.
Ukrepezaspodbujanjezdravjaje mogočeopredelitikotukrepe,ki podpirajoljudi priizbiriin vzdrževanjuzdravega načinaživljenjain ustvarjajo ugodne življenjske razmere (okolja) za zdravje13.
Actions of this type were largelycovered bythe‘health determinants’strand ofthe PHP. The auditanalysed whethertherightconditions were set by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission whendesigning the programme, and by the Commission and the project coordinators whenimplementingit,forprojectstocontributeeffectivelytothe capacity of European citizenstoimprovetheir health.
Ukrepi te vrstesobilivečinomazajetivsklop„determinantzdravja“PJZ.Pri reviziji je bilo analizirano, ali so Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija pri snovanju programa ter Komisija in koordinatorji projektov pri njegovemizvajanju vzpostavili prave pogoje, da bi projekti uspešno prispevali ksposobnosti evropskih državljanovzaizboljšanje njihovega zdravja.
In all these areas projects were selected for funding in each of the years 2003
Izbrana področja politike so
The Court examined whether: to 2007 (see Annex I).
Na vseh teh področjih so bili projekti izbrani za financiranje v vsakem od let od 2003 do 2007 (glej Prilogo I).
The sample included all projects
Vzorec je vseboval vse projekte,
(a)the design of the PHP provided a suitable framework for the effective implementation and monitoring of Communityfunded health promotionactionscomplementing measurestakenby Member States;
(b) je Komisija na stopnji izvajanja programa in izbiranja projektov zagotovila, da je za projekte v okviru sklopa „determinant zdravja“ PJZ verjetno, da dosežejo trajnostne rezultate, se dopolnjujejo ter zagotavljajo dodano vrednost EU,in
(b)the Commission ensured, at the programmeimplementation and project selection stage, that projects under the ‘healthdeterminants’strand of the PHP were likely to achieve sustainable results, were complementary and provided EU added value; and which were either completed or had submitted at least a first interim technical report in the six ‘lifestyle health determinants’ policy areas: alcohol, tobacco, drugs, nutrition and physical activity, sexual and reproductive health and mental health.
ki so bili končani ali pa je bilo zanje predloženo vsaj prvo vmesno tehnično poročilo, s šestih področij politike, ki zadevajo determinante zdravja, povezane z načinom življenja: alkohol, tobak, droge, prehrana in telesna dejavnost, spolno in reproduktivno zdravje, duševno zdravje.
(a)ananalysisoftheprogramme’slegalbaseandareviewofpro-gramme evaluations and otherrelevant documentation;
(c)oceno vzorca 36 (od skupno 149) projektov, financiranih iz sklopa „determinant zdravja“, torej iz enega od sklopov PJZ (2003–2007).