natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court noted in its benchmarking exercise that some agencies apply a quality assurance mechanism with respect to Logframes, including quantitative and qualitative performanceindicators.
Sodišče je pri svoji primerjavi ugotovilo, da nekatere agencije uporabljajo mehanizem zagotavljanja kakovosti v zvezi z Logframes, vključno s kazalniki kvantitativnein kvalitativne uspešnosti.
INSUFFICIENT PROJECT FIELD VISITS CARRIED OUT BY COMMISSION STAFF
ŠTEVILO OBISKOV PROJEKTOV NA TERENU, KI SO JIH OPRAVILI
Proper monitoring of projects by Delegations includes regular and direct contacts withthe NSA partners, and discussions onimplementation issues affecting project performance.
Pravilno spremljanje projektov, ki ga opravljajo delegacije, zajema redne inneposrednestikes partnerskimi nedržavnimi akterji ter razprave o vprašanjih vzvezizizvajanjem, ki vplivajo na uspešnost projekta.
The audit examined to what extent the Commission carried out physical, on-site inspections of projects including checking the accounts and supporting documents of projectsinthe offices ofthe grant beneficiaries and their implementing partners.
Prirevizijije bilo preučeno, v kolikšnem obseguje Komisijaizvajala fizične preglede projektov na kraju samem, vključno s pregledovanjem računovodskih izkazov in spremne dokumentacije projektov v prostorih upravičencev do donacij in njihovih izvajalskih partnerjev.
The Courtfoundthatthelevel of on-site controls wasinsufficient.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da stopnja pregledov na kraju samem ni bila zadostna.
Moreover, many NSAs interviewed expressed regret about the lack of on-site support from the Delegations.
Poleg tega so številni nedržavni akterji, s katerimi so potekali razgovori, izrazili obžalovanje zaradi premajhne podpore delegacij na kraju samem.
Their responses suggested that many errors related to thefinancial and contractual rules could be avoided by on-site checks at the appropriate point in time, as incorrect practices would become visible and could berectified.
Njihovi odgovori kažejo, da bi se bilo številnim napakam v zvezi s finančnimi in pogodbenimi pravili mogočeizognitispre-gledi na kraju samem v primernem času, saj bi se na ta način pokazale nepravilne praksein bijihlahko odpravili.
Six out of the 16 audited projects had not been visited by Delegation staff at all.
Uslužbenci delegacije sploh niso obiskali šestih od 16 revidiranih projektov.
For the projects visited, there was generally no systematic pattern.
Pri projektih, ki so bili obiskani, ni bilo sistematičnega vzorca.
Sometimes visits were made in connection with events organ-isedbythe NSAs,sometimesthey were madejointly withexternal monitoring missions.
Včasih so bili obiski opravljeni v zvezi z dogodki, ki so jih organizirali nedržavni akterji, včasih pa so bili opravljeni hkrati z zunanjimi obiski z namenom spremljanja.
In some cases specific and concrete plans to carry outfield visits at definedstages ofthe projects’lifetime were indeed laid down.
V nekaterih primerih so bili pripravljeni spe-cifičniin konkretni načrtizaizvedbo obiskov naterenu v določenih fazah trajanja projekta.
However, in all these cases the plans were not fully implemented due to a lack of resources.
V vseh teh primerih pa načrti zaradi pomanjkanja sredstev niso bili izvedeni v celoti.
There wasnostandardfor the monitoring reports established by the Delegations visited by the Court.
Delegacije, ki jih je obiskalo Sodišče, niso določile nobenega standarda za poročila o spremljanju.
Before December 2007, staff had no operational guidelines for project monitoring.
Do decembra 2007 uslužbenci niso imeli nobenih operativnih smernic zaspremljanje projektov.
Projects may also be selected for external monitoring through the resultsoriented monitoring missions of the Commission (ROM).
Projekteje mogočeizbratitudi za zunanje spremljanje prek obiskov Komisije v okviru v rezultate usmerjenega spremljanja (ROM).
This technique, however, does not compensate for an absence of monitoring at operational level: most projects involving NSAs have an EC contribution of less than 1 million euro, and under the ROM system only about 10 % of projects belowthis value areselectedfor monitoring.
Vendar ta tehnika ne nadomesti odsotnosti spremljanja na operativni ravni: ES v večini projektov, pri katerih so vključeni nedržavni akterji, prispeva manj kakor 1 milijon EUR, v okviru sistema ROM paje za spremljanje izbranihle okoli 10 % projektov podto vrednostjo.
EXTERNAL EVALUATIONS HAVE NOT PROVIDED ADEQUATE ASSESSMENTS
ZUNANJE OCENE NISO ZAGOTOVILE USTREZNIH
OF THE IMPACT OF NSA PROJECTS
OCEN UČINKA PROJEKTOV NEDRŽAVNIH AKTERJEV
The last generation of grant contracts signed in Peru already foresees this.
Zadnja generacija pogodb o donaciji, podpisanih v Peruju, to že predvideva.
NSA grant contracts generally provide for external evaluations at the end ofthe project and/or at mid-stage.
V pogodbah o donacijah z nedržavnimi akterji so običajno predvidene zunanje ocene ob koncu in/ali na sredi projekta.
The standardterms ofrefer-encefor evaluations are not compulsoryforthistype of evaluation, and there is a risk of conflict of interest as under current practice the contracting of evaluators is done by the beneficiaries.
Standardna pooblastila za ocene niso obvezna za te vrste ocen, poleg tega pa obstaja tveganje navzkrižja interesov, saj je trenutna praksa, da izvajalce vrednotenja najamejo upravičenci.
The Court noted in benchmarking that certain development agencies operate a quality assurance mechanism withrespectto evaluations commissioned by the beneficiary NSAs.
Sodišče je s primerjavo ugotovilo, da nekatere razvojne agencije uporabljajo mehanizem zagotavljanja kakovosti za vrednotenja, ki jih naročijo upravičeni nedržavni akterji.
The evaluations carried out, together with the other assessment and reporting instruments currently in use (NSAs’ reports, field visits and ROM reports), do not provide adequate assessments of the impact of NSAs’ individual projects.
Opravljena vrednotenja, skupaj z drugimi instrumenti ocenjevanja in poročanja, ki se sedaj uporabljajo (poročila nedržavnih akterjev; obiski na terenu in poročila ROM), ne zagotavljajo ustreznih ocen učinka posameznih projektov nedržavnih akterjev.
This is either because the objectives are expressedinsuch broadtermsthattheycannot beassociated with measurable indicators of impact, or because the means of verification areinadequate ortoo costly.
To je zato, ker so cilji izraženitakoširoko,dajihni mogočepovezatiz merljivimikazal-niki učinka, ali pa zato, ker so sredstva za preverjanje neustrezna ali predraga.
The Commission is moving towards results-based management with more emphasison measuring the impact and results and evaluating the added value ofits development cooperation.
Komisija prehaja na upravljanje na podlagi rezultatov z večjim poudarkom na merjenju učinka in rezultatov ter ocenjevanju dodane vrednosti njenega razvojnega sodelovanja.
This puts greater pressure on NSAs to develop systems to monitor not only outputs but also outcomes and impacts34 , and requires that more practical guidance is provided by Commission services to ensurethat Logframes and performanceindicators are appropriate andremainrelevant.
To na nedržavne akterje ustvarja večji pritisk, da razvijejo sisteme, s katerimi se ne bodo spremljalile izložki, ampak tudi rezultati in učinki34, od služb Komisije pa zahteva, naj zagotovijo več praktičnih smernic za zagotovitev ustreznosti Log-framesin kazalnikov uspešnostiter njihove nadaljnjerelevantnosti.
The project selection process includes the assessment of sustainability, thatis ofthe prospectsforthe projectresultsto be permanent.
Proces izbire projektov vključuje oceno trajnosti, torej oceno možnosti, da bodo rezultati projekta trajni.
The Commission has recently introduced ex post resultsoriented monitor-ingthat coverssustainability andimpact at projectlevel.
Komisija je pred kratkim uvedla naknadno spremljanje, usmerjeno v rezultate, ki zajema trajnost in učinek naravni projektov.
The average period for the projects audited was 37 months, extensions included.
Povprečno trajanje revidiranih projektov je bilo skupaj s podaljšanji 37 mesecev.
While the 16 projects audited have achieved or are likely to achieve good results in the short term, their prospects for sustainability were much less positive.
Medtem ko je 16 revidiranih projektov doseglo ali bo verjetno kratkoročno doseglo dobre rezultate, pa so njihove možnostizatrajnost veliko manj pozitivne.
At the time of the Court’s audit, sustainability was uncertain for 12 of the projects, either because of alack of funds after the end ofthe project or duetoinadequateinstitutional arrangements.
V času revizije Sodišča je bila negotova trajnost 12 projektov, pri nekaterih zaradi pomanjkanja sredstev po koncu projekta, pri drugih pa zaradi neustreznihinstitucionalnih ureditev.
An example ofthelatteris providedin Box 6.
Primerslednjihje naveden v Okviru 6.
The prospects for sustainability for the remaining four projects were good notbecausethey were intrinsically sustainable, but rather because they are run by international NGOs with long-term commitment, which are able to secure funding from other sources than the European Union.
Možnosti za trajnost ostalih štirih projektov so bile dobre, ne zato, ker so bili sami po sebi trajnostni, temveč zato, ker so mednarodne nevladne organizacije sprejele dolgoročno obveznost, da jih bodo vodile, in so lahko zagotovilefinanciranjeiz drugih virov poleg Evropske unije.
Long-term commitment and funding, together with the need to ensure institutional arrangements allowing the relevant stakeholders to take over the activities, are essential elements of sustainability.
Nujni elementi trajnosti so sprejetje dolgoročne obveznosti in finančna sredstva, skupaj s potrebo po zagotovitiviinstitucionalnih ureditev, ki omogočajo relevantnim zainteresiranim stranem, da prevzamejo dejavnosti.
The Court’s audit has shown that project duration is generally insufficient to ensure sustainability even after extensions35 .
Revizija Sodišča je pokazala, da trajanje projektov običajno niti po podaljšanjih ne zadostuje, da bi zagotovilo trajnost 35.
In addition the actual implementation period is in practice often shortened by late start-up (see paragraph 41).
Poleg tega se dejansko obdobje izvajanja projekta v praksi skrajša še zaradi poznega začetka(glej odstavek 41).
The current project approach is also faced with the potential contradiction of using short-term interventions to address structural problems that need long-term commitment.
Sedanji pristop k projektom se sooča tudi z možnimi nasprotji zaradi uporabekratkoročnih posegov za reševanje strukturnih problemov, ki zahtevajo dolgoročno obveznost.
Sustainability is especially a problem for the capacitydevelopment element of projects becausethis typically requires social and attitude changes whichrequire much moretimethanis generally availablefor projectimplementation.
Trajnost je problem zlasti za element razvoja zmogljivosti projektov, ker ta običajno zahteva družbene spremembe in spremembe v odnosu, ki zahtevajo veliko več časa, kot gaje običajno na voljo zaizvajanje projekta.
SUPPORT TO POLICING OF CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THE EASTERN CAPE SOUTH AFRICA VICTIM FRIENDLY CENTRES
PODPORA NADZORU NAD KAZNIVIMI DEJANJI ZOPER ŽENSKE IN OTROKE V PROVINCI VZHODNA KAPLANDIJA JUŽNA AFRIKA ŽRTVAM PRIJAZNI CENTRI
Whereas the South African police authorities were able to continue to cover the running costs of the care centres for victims of violence a er the project ended, there was a risk that volunteers working in the centres would not be available in the future as the Social Welfare Department had not yet assumed the responsibility for their supervision and training as foreseen in the project design.
Južnoafriški policijski organi so sicer lahko po izteku projekta še naprej pokrivali tekoče stroške centrov za pomoč žrtvam nasilja, vendar pa je obstajala nevarnost, da prostovoljci, ki so delali v centru, v prihodnje ne bodo več na razpolago, saj služba socialnega skrbstva še ni prevzela odgovornosti za nadzor in usposabljanje, kot je bilo predvideno v zasnovi projekta.
Several development agencies use framework partnership agreements which typically run for four to eight years.
Več razvojnih agencij uporablja okvirne sporazume o partnerstvu, ki ponavadi trajajo štiri do osem let.
The Court noted in its benchmarking exercise that other development agencies avoid some of the problems of poor design and short project duration by using a range of instruments in addition to specific projects, including long-term framework partnership agreements with competitivelyselected NSAs36.
Sodiščejevsvoji primerjaviopazilo, dase drugerazvojneagencije nekaterim problemom, ki nastopijo zaradi slabe zasnovein kratkega trajanja projektov, izogibajo tako, da poleg specifičnih projektov uporabljajo raznolike instrumente, vključno z dolgoročnimi okvirnimi sporazumi o partnerstvu s konkurenčno izbranimi nedržavnimi akterji36.
DOES THE COMMISSION ADEQUATELY ENSURE THE PROVISION OF CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT TO NSAS?
ALI KOMISIJA NEDRŽAVNIM AKTERJEM USTREZNO ZAGOTAVLJA RAZVOJ ZMOGLJIVOSTI?
support to NSAs is meant to strengthen their role as partners in development cooperation (see paragraph 8 and Box 1) but it also includes training in project management to improve the quality of their projects and to increase their capacity to apply for and raise funds from donors.
37Podpora nedržavnim akterjem za razvoj zmogljivosti je namenjena krepitvi njihove vloge kot partnerjev v razvojnem sodelovanju (glej odstavek 8 in Okvir 1), vključuje pa tudi usposabljanje za vodenje projektov, da se izboljša kakovost projektov in poveča sposobnost uporabe in zbiranja sredstev pri donatorjih.
This section addresses the question whether the Commission has translated boththelegalrequirements andthe policystatements on capacitydevelopment support for NSAsintoastrategyinallthe beneficiary countries andregions, and carriedit outthroughrelevant activities effectivelyimplemented.
Ta del obravnavavprašanje,alije Komisija pravnezahteveinizjave o politiki v zvezi s podporo razvoju zmogljivosti nedržavnih akterjev prenesla v strategijo v vseh državah in regijah upravičenkah ter ali jetoizvedla zrelevantnimi dejavnostmi, kisose uspešnoizvajale.
STRATEGY FOR CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT OF NSAs
STRATEGIJA ZA RAZVOJ ZMOGLJIVOSTI NEDRŽAVNIH AKTERJEV
Capacity development is intended to strengthen NSAs’ role both as partners in the development process and as implementing actors 37.
Razvoj zmogljivosti je namenjen krepitvi vloge nedržavnih akterjev kot partnerjev v razvojnem procesu in kot izvajalcev37.
In order to support it effectively, and to ensure coherence and complementarity with other programmes and donors, the Commission needs to devise a strategy for each country setting out which NSAs, sectors andthemesshould betargeted, and what working methodsto use.
Za uspešnost pod- porein za zagotovitev doslednostiin skladnosti z drugimi programi in donatorji mora Komisija za vsako državo razviti strategijo, v kateri navede, na katere nedržavne akterje, sektorje in teme se je treba osredotočitiin katere metode najse uporabijo.
The Court examined whether such a strategy existed for the ACP coun-tries(wherethe provision of capacity developmentto NSAsis bind-ing),andfor Asian and Latin Americancountries, wheretheformer ALAregulationdidnot mention capacitydevelopment .
Sodišče je preučilo, ali je taka strategija obstajala za države AKP (kjer je zagotavljanje razvoja zmogljivosti nedržavnih akterjev zavezujoče) ter za azijske in latinskoameriške države, za katere prejšnja Uredba o azijskihinlatinskoameriških državah ni omenjala razvoja zmogljivosti.
The Court also examined whether the entryin forcein January 2007 of the DCI, which repealed the ALA regulation and mentionstheprovisionof capacity development to NSAs, has meant any change in the existing strategies.
Sodiščeje preučilo tudi, alije začetek veljavnosti Instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje januarja 2007, s katerim se razveljavi Uredba o azijskih in latinskoameriških državah in v katerem je omenjeno zagotavljanje razvoja zmogljivosti nedržavnim akterjem, povzročil spremembe v obstoječihstrategijah.
EXISTENCE OF TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES
OBSTOJ DVEH RAZLIČNIH PRISTOPOV
In the ACP countries there are around 46 capacitydevelopment programmes in 43 countries, amounting to 226 million euro.
46 programov za razvoj zmogljivosti v 43 državah, kar znaša 226 milijonov EUR.
Following the signature of the Cotonou Agreement (see paragraph 8), in most of the ACP countries strategies have been developed and programmes set up for capacitydevelopment of NSAs,financedby the EU 38.
skoameriške države ni niti posebnih strategij za razvoj zmogljivosti nedržavnih akterjev ob podpori ES nititakih programov39. Tarazlika
There are some exceptions nor such programmes39. This difference does not result from an overall assessment of needs, but mainly reflects the fact that capacitydevelopment support to NSAsin ACP countries is legally required, whereasfor ALA countriesit was not.
Obstajajo nekatere izjeme, ni posledica splošne ocene potreb, temveč je zlasti odsev dejstva, daje podpora nedržavnim akterjem za razvoj zmogljivosti v državah AKP obvezna po zakonu, v azijskih in latinskoameriških državah pa ni bila.
usually resulting from highly specific circumstances such as Bangladesh because it has a very large NGO sector (206 000 organisations) or Colombia because of its internal armed conflict.
ki so ponavadi posledica zelo posebnih okoliščin, kot je Bangladeš, ki ima zelo velik sektor nevladnih organizacij (okoli 206 000 organizacij), ali Kolumbija zaradi svojih notranjih oboroženih spopadov.
The DCI, applicable since 2007for ALA countries,includes capacity-developmentfor NSAs in the areas of cooperation covered by geographic programmes and sets out as an important principle that these programmes should be the normal instrument for providing support, since they are based on assessments of needs and strategic partnerships with governments.Thematic programmes, onthe other hand, are only to be used if the geographic programmes are not appropriate, for example in countries with difficult partnerships40 or having population groups out of reach of mainstream services and resources and excludedfromthe policymaking process.
Instrument za razvojno sodelovanje, ki se za azijske in latinskoameriške države uporablja od leta 2007, vključuje razvoj zmogljivosti nedržavnih akterjev na področjih sodelovanja, ki jih pokrivajo geografski programi,in določa pomembno načelo, da bi morali bititi programi običajen instrument za zagotavljanje podpore, ker temeljijo na ocenah potreb in strateškem partnerstvu z vladami. Tematski programi se po drugi strani uporabljajo samo, če geografski programi niso primerni, na primer v državah s težavnimi partnerstvi40 ali v državah, v katerih so skupine prebivalstva izven dosega osnovnih storitev in virov ter so izključene iz procesa oblikovanja politike.
Despitethis clearly stated principle, there has been no change in the wayin whichcapacity-development support is funded in ALA countries since the entry into force of the DCI, and the existing support continues to be funded by the thematic programme (non-state actors and local authorities in development).
Kljub temu jasno izraženemu načeluse načinfinanciranja podpore za razvoj zmogljivosti v azijskih in latinskoameriških državah od začetka veljavnosti instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje sploh ni spremenil in obstoječa podpora se še naprej financira s tematskim programom (nedržavni akterjiinlokalni organi oblasti vrazvoju).
40Situations of difficult partnership are defined as those where for one of the following reasons the usual cooperation instruments cannot be fully used to support initiatives undertaken by stakeholders other than central governments: (1) countries where cooperation has been suspended; (2) countries where the authorities are not committed to objectives of poverty reduction and to other basic principles of development policy, including good governance and participation of NSAs and decentralised authorities; (3) countries where the dialogue on participatory approaches to development is very limited.
opredeljena kot tista partnerstva, pri katerih ni mogoče v celoti uporabljati običajnih instrumentov sodelovanja z namenom podpiranja pobud zainteresiranih strani, ki niso centralne vlade, zaradi enega od naslednjih razlogov: (1) države, v katerih je sodelovanje prekinjeno, (2) države, v katerih se organi oblasti ne zavzemajo za cilje zmanjševanja revščine in za druga temeljna načela razvojne politike, vključno z odgovornim vodenjem države in udeležbo nedržavnih akterjev ter decentraliziranih organov oblasti, in (3) države, kjer je dialog o participativnih pristopih k razvoju zelo omejen.
The participation of NSAs in
Udeležba nedržavnih akterjev
The lack of a particular strategy is further underlined by the fact that for Asian and Latin American countries, wherefundsfor NSAcap-acity development are morelimited,the possibilitiesto mainstream involvement of and support to NSAs in the main sectoral programmes financed in these countries (e.g. health or education) have nevertheless not been fully explored.
Pomanjkanje posebne strategije je še bolj izrazito zaradi dejstva, da za azijske in latinskoameriške države, kjer so sredstva za razvoj zmogljivosti nedržavnih akterjev bolj omejena, kljub temu niso bile v celoti preučene možnosti za splošno vključitev in podporo nedržavnim akterjem v glavnih sektorskih programih, ki se financirajo v teh državah (npr. zdravstvo ali izobraževanje).
The Commission is preparing a document41 with the aim of producing guidelines for Delegations that will helpto addressthisissue.
Komisija pripravlja dokument41, kateregaciljje pripravitismerniceza delegacije,ki bodo pomagale prireševanjutega vprašanja.
poverty-reduction strategies, sector approaches and monitoring of project implementation (draft paper of EuropeAid E.4, August 2008).
pri strategijah za zmanjševanje revščine, sektorskih pristopih in spremljanju izvajanja projektov (osnutek EuropeAid E.4, avgust 2008).
PROGRAMMES ON CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT OF NSAs
PROGRAMI ZA RAZVOJ ZMOGLJIVOSTI NEDRŽAVNIH AKTERJEV
Due to the late start of the
Zaradi poznega začetka
The Court examined seven programmes amounting to 72,1 million euro (Annex III) to assess their relevance and how efficiently they programmes, it was generally too early to assess their effectiveness.
Sodišče je preučilo sedem programov, ki znašajo 72,1 milijona EUR (Priloga III), da bi ocenilo njihovo relevantnost in učinkovitost njihovega izvajanja programov je bilo na splošno prezgodaj, da bi ocenili njihovo uspešnost.
have been implemented 42.
izvajanja 42.
These programmes combine capacitydevelopment activities with the funding of a series of small
Ti programi združujejo dejavnosti razvoja zmogljivosti sfinanciranjem niza malih projektov.
The Court examined whether the programmes started on time, whether they wereimplemented within reasonable timescales, and whether the management procedures were sufficiently flexible and suited local realities, especially ofsmall and community-based organisations.
Sodišče je preučilo, ali so se programi začeli izvajati pravočasno, ali so bili izvedeni v razumnem časovnem okviru in ali so bili postopki upravljanja dovolj prožni in primerni za lokalne razmere, zlasti v majhnih organizacijahin organizacijah lokalnih skupnosti.
PROGRAMMES ARE RELEVANT ALTHOUGH THERE IS A LACK OF DETAILED SITUATION
PROGRAMI SO RELEVANTNI, ČEPRAV PRIMANJKUJE PODROBNIH
ASSESSMENTS IN ALA COUNTRIES
OCEN STANJA V AZIJSKIH IN LATINSKOAMERIŠKIH DRŽAVAH
The programmes examined were found relevant and addressed clear needs and priorities of the NSAs.
Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so pregledani programi relevantni in obravnavajo jasne potrebein prednostne nalogeza nedržavne akterje.