natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
•The EU budget is limited in size. Compared with national budgets, which take up anaverage of around 45 % of national income, the EU budget is only a little over 1 %.
•Proračun EU je po viini omejen.V primerjavi z nacionalnimi proračuni, ki v povprečju zajemajo 45 % nacionalnega prihodka, proračun EU zajema le nekaj več kot 1 %.
The Commission did not propose any change in the ceiling on resources to be determined at EUlevel, which remains at 1.24 % of gross national income, but only an increase in the resourcesused within that ceiling.
Komisija nipredlagala nobenih sprememb v omejitvi virov, ki se določajo na ravni EU in ostaja na 1,24%bruto nacionalnega dohodka, ampak samo povečanje uporabljenih virov znotraj navedeneomejitve.
Mobilising this margin became necessary because of the increasingresponsibilities of the Union and of the cost of successive enlargements: against this background, it should be noted that the increase rate of the EU budget over the last seven yearswas half of the increase of the Member States’ budgets.
Aktiviranje te stopnje je postalo potrebno zaradi vse večjih odgovornosti Unije instrokov zaporednih iritev: poleg tega je treba omeniti, da je stopnja povečanja proračuna EU zadnjih 7 let bila le polovica stopnje povečanja proračunov držav članic.
•Many of the political decisions which will determine the next financial perspectives have already been taken.
•Mnogo političnih odločitev, ki bodo odločale o naslednjem finančnem načrtu, je že bilosprejetih.
These already set clear spending requirements, asdescribed below.
Te postavljajo jasne proračunske zahteve:
—The current phase of enlargement will add 5 % to the Union’s GDP — and to its revenues— but with 30 % extra population.
—Sedanja faza iritve bo k BDP Unije in njenemu proračunu dodala 5 % – toda tudi 30 %več prebivalcev.
It follows that expenditure will increase more than revenue.
Iz tega sledi, da se bodo odhodki povečali bolj kot prihodki.
For example, enlargement means 4 million additional farmers, an increase of 50%,and a doubling of income disparities between rich and poor.
Na primer,iritev pomeni 4 milijone dodatnih kmetovalcev, to je 50-odstotno povečanje, in povečanje dohodkovnih neskladij med bogatimi in revnimi.
The budget is expected tosupport the Lisbon strategy and the transformation of the EU economy towards competitiveness and innovation.
Od proračuna se pričakuje, da bo podpiral lizbonsko strategijo in preobrazbo gospodarstva EU v konkurenčno in inovativno.
—The agreement reached on agricultural financing to 2013 already determines a large shareof the EU budget.
—Dosežen sporazum o financiranju kmetijstva do 2013 že določa velik del proračuna EU.
—The European Union is to take on new tasks at EU level, in particular in the area of freedom, security and justice to deal with new security threats and crises.
—Evropska unija mora sprejeti nove naloge na ravni EU, zlasti na področju svobode, varnosti in pravosodja, da se bo spoprijela z novimi krizami in grožnjami glede varnosti.
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVES• 2007–13
FINANČNA PERSPEKTIVA• 2007–2013
The political consensus for action
Politični konsenz za ukrepanje
The proposals made build on the work of the Council and the European Parliament to developa clear vision of Europe’s future.
Predlogi gradijo na delu Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta, ki želita razviti jasno vizijo o prihodnosti Evrope.
There is a broad political consensus about where the Union mustact; this is reflected in the Treaty and the Constitution, in European Parliament resolutions, andin European Council conclusions.
Obstaja irok politični konsenz o tem, kje mora Unija ukrepati; to je zapisano v Pogodbi in Ustavi, v resolucijah Evropskega parlamenta in sklepih Evropskega sveta.
Core goals like employment, sustainable development, security and an effective world role are firmly established.
Ključni cilji,kot so zaposlovanje, trajnostni razvoj, varnost in učinkovita vloga v svetu, so trdno zastavljeni:
•The single market has given European economies a real opportunity to add an extra dimension to growth and prosperity.
•Enotni trg je dal evropskim gospodarstvom pravo možnost, da dodajo posebno dimenzijorasti in blaginji.
With Europe’s growth potential slipping from 3 to 2 % in thespace of a few years, economic performance must be improved.
Ker je potencial v nekaj letih res zdrsel s 3 % na 2 %, je treba popraviti gospodarsko uspenost.
Unemployment remains atunacceptable levels, and the risks of social exclusion are increasing.
Brezposlenost ostaja na nesprejemljivi ravni, tveganja družbene izključenosti se večajo.
Where EU liberalisationbrings change, the EU must help to smooth transition. Enlargement has brought a wideninggap between the richer and poorer Member States which saps the vitality of the Europeaneconomy.
Kjer liberalizacija EU prinaa spremembe, mora EU pomagati ublažiti tranzicijo. iritev je povzročila irok prepad med bogatimi in revnimi državami članicami, karspodkopava vitalnost evropskega gospodarstva.
To achieve growth and reduce disparities, action is needed at every level.
Za doseganje rasti in zmanjanje neskladij je treba ukrepati na vseh ravneh.
This imperativeunderpins the Lisbon strategy, but so far the results have fallen well short of expectations.
Ta obveza podpira lizbonsko strategijo, toda do sedaj rezultati niso izpolnili pričakovanj.
Anew impetus and a new direction must be found to make Europe a dynamic knowledgebased economy, and in parallel to reinforce the Union’s cohesion in the wake of enlargement.
Treba je najti novogonilno silo in novo smer, da bo evropsko gospodarstvo dinamično in temeljilo na znanju;vzporedno s tem je treba okrepiti kohezijo Unije po iritvi.
European society has been shaped by its landscapes, its waters, itscountryside, and the resources they bring.
Evropsko družbo oblikujejo njene krajine, vode, podeželje in viri, ki jihti prinaajo.
The challenge is to manage and protect theseresources for current and future generations.
Način, kako upravljati s temi viri in jih varovati za sedanje in prihodnje rodove,ostaja izziv.
The role of the European Union in this field isclear.
Vloga Evropske unije je na tem področju jasna.
The food Europe produces circulates in a single market, and needs to be maintained ata high level of quality.
Hrana, ki se prideluje v Evropi,kroži po enotnem trgu in treba je ohranjati visoko raven njene kakovosti.
Environmental imperatives must be tackled on a continental and global scale.
Na globalni in kontinentalni ravni se je treba lotiti okoljskih obveznosti.
It is no coincidence that these have long been amongst the core common policies ofthe Union.
Ni naključje, da so te že dolgo med ključnimi skupnimi politikami Unije.
•The EU is now called upon to address concerns which go to the heart of citizens’ interests.
•EU je sedaj na vrsti, da se spoprime s težavami, ki so že dolgo v srcu interesa državljanov.Državljanstvo EU je do sedaj bilo vpraanje vrednot: te je treba preusmeriti v delovanje.
EUcitizenship has so far been a question of values: these need to be translated into action.Organised crime and terrorism are crossborder threats.
Organizirani kriminal in terorizem sta čezmejni grožnji.
Illegal immigration can only be tackled by working together.
Nelegalno priseljevanje je mogoče reitiskupaj.
The single market automatically requires EU action on public health,food safety and consumer interests.
Enotni trg samodejno zahteva ukrepanje EU na področjih javnega zdravja, varne hrane in interesov potronikov.
Increased diversity provides opportunities which demanda collective response.
Večja raznolikost omogoča priložnosti, ki zahtevajo kolektivni odziv.
In all these areas, action is indispensable at the European level.
Na vseh teh področjih je neizogibno delovanje na evropski ravni.
•The weight of the EU is impressive: more than 450 million inhabitants, a quarter of world output, a leading trade power, the biggest aid donor.
•Teža EU je presunljiva: več kot 450 milijonov prebivalcev, četrtina svetovne proizvodnje, vodilna trgovska moč, največji donator pomoči.
Against this background, the outside worldis constantly testing the EU’s ability to act or react as a political entity.
Ob upotevanju tega zunanji svet neprenehoma preizkua sposobnost EU, da deluje ali se odziva kot politični subjekt.
The EU faces the crucial choice of whether to accept a responsibility to lead: if it does so, its financial and political obligations vis-à-vis its partners and neighbours will be immense.
EU se sooča s pomembno izbiro glede tega, ali naj sprejme vodstveno odgovornost: če jo, potem bodo njenefinančne in politične obveznosti nasproti njenim partnerjem in sosedam ogromne.
But can it isolate itselfand refuse to take up the challenge?
Toda ali selahko osami in zavrne izziv?
Working together and speaking with one voice, the Union can bring to bear a unique mix of policy levers: aid, trade, economic cooperation andpolitical dialogue.
Če delamo skupaj in govorimo skupni jezik, potem lahko Unijadopuča edinstveno meanico političnih gibal: pomoči, trgovine, gospodarskega sodelovanja in političnega dialoga.
The cost of inaction is high.A failure to address problems and inject solutions into the European economy now would risk a downward economic spiral.
Cena nedelovanja je visoka.Nezmožnost reevanja problemov in podajanja reitev za evropskogospodarstvo bi sedaj pomenila tveganje spiralnega gospodarskega padca.
A failure to conserve and manage natural resources would mean bequeathing extra costs to future generations.
Nezmožnost ohranitve in upravljanja naravnih virov bi pomenila dodatne stroke za prihodnje generacije.
A failure toaddress citizens’ concerns for security and quality of life would bring both disillusionment anddanger.
Nezmožnost narediti zunanjo politiko učinkovitejo bi zapravilo možnost, da se projicirajo in zavarujejo evropske vrednote in da se spodbuja mir in razvoj po vsemsvetu.
A failure to make external policy more effective would squander the opportunity to project and protect European values and to promote peace and development worldwide.
Vpreči je treba vse sile, da bodo cilji uresničeni: nacionalno ukrepanje, zakonodaja Skupnosti,koordinacija in javna poraba iz proračuna EU. Naloga politikov Unije je zagotoviti pravo kombinacijo ob pravem času.
The return on investmentdepends on targeting the right objectives at the right level.
Donos iz naložb je odvisen od prizadevanja za prave cilje na ustrezni ravni.
National action should be chosenwhen this will bring the best results: EU-level action when most effective.
Nacionalno ukrepanje je treba izbrati, ko bo prineslo najbolje rezultate: ukrepanje na ravni Unije, ko bo najučinkoviteje.
Where a euro spentthrough the EU budget will bring more return than a euro spent at national level, this is the bestway to offer value for money to the taxpayer.
Kadar bo porabljen evro v proračunu EU prinesel večji donos kot porabljen evro nanacionalni ravni, bo to pomenilo večjo vrednost denarja davkoplačevalca.
Pooling national resources at EU level can bringmajor savings for national budgets.
Koarica nacionalnihvirov na ravni EU lahko prinese velike prihranke nacionalnim proračunom.
There are many Union instruments where little or no funding is required.
Obstaja več instrumentov Unije, pri katerih financiranje ni potrebno ali pa je minimalno.
In some areas, the Union’s task is to ensure a fair and effective regulatory framework for action, as in competitionpolicy, the internal market or the environment.
Na nekaterih področjih je naloga Unije zagotoviti pravičen in učinkovit ureditveni okvir za ukrepanje napodročju konkurenčne politike, notranjega trga ali okolja.
This work is essential to the Union’s politicalgoals, but little funding is involved.
Za politične cilje Unije je to delo bistvenega pomena, čeprav je vanje vpleteno malo finančnih sredstev.
However, many EU policies must be accompanied by financial resources if they are to be effective.
Toda mnoge politike EU morajo spremljati finančna sredstva, če želijo biti učinkovite.
To expect more Europe for less money is simply unrealistic.
Pričakovati več Evrope za manj denarja je preprosto nerealno.
New policy areas at the EU levelimply new financial requirements.
Nova politična področja na ravni EU pomenijo nove finančne zahteve.
The Commission has examined where spending is a necessary part of the policy mix. It hasensured in its proposals that the size and nature of the expenditure is proportionate; and thatthe policy is managed to bring the best return on the investment.
Komisija je preučila, kje je poraba iz proračuna bistvena za zmes politik.V svojih predlogih je zagotovila, da sta velikost in narava porabe sorazmerna in da je politika naravnana tako, da prinaa najbolji donos iz naložb.
Where these tests are met,policy must not be deprived of the resources needed to deliver effectively.
Kjer je to preizkueno, politika ne sme biti prikrajana za sredstva,ki jih potrebuje za učinkovito izvajanje.
The EU budget is limited in size, but its expected impact is major. Compared withnational budgets, which take up an average of around 45 % of national income, the EU budget is just a little over 1 %.
Proračun EU je po viini omejen, vendar je njegov pričakovani vpliv poglaviten.V primerjavi z nacionalnimi proračuni, ki v povprečju zajemajo 45 % nacionalnega prihodka, proračun EU zajema le nekaj več kot 1 %.
National budgets have been rising, with a rate of increase in nationalbudgets more than double that of the EU budget over the past seven years.
Nacionalni proračuni se večajo s stopnjo, ki je dvakrat večjaod stopnje večanja proračuna EU v zadnjih sedmih letih.
The Commissionproposes a moderate increase in the resources available to the Union to meet the above challenges and commitments.
Komisija za doseganje zgoraj navedenih ciljev in obveznosti predlaga zmerni porast razpoložljivih virov za Unijo.
The Commission will assess regularly, and in any case by 2010, therequired payment appropriations for the period beyond 2013 in order to ensure an adequateevolution of payment with respect to commitment appropriations.
Komisija bo rednoocenjevala, v vsakem primeru pa do leta 2010, zahtevane odobritve plačil za obdobje po 2013,da bo zagotovila primeren razvoj plačil glede na odobritve za prevzem obveznosti.
This assessment will takeaccount of the actual use of commitment and payment appropriations, as well as of the forecastof the EU’s gross national income (GNI) and of the use of appropriations.
Ta ocena boupotevala dejansko uporabo odobritev za plačila in prevzem obveznosti, kot tudi napoved za BND EU in uporabo odobrenih sredstev.
THE VALUE ADDED OF THE COMMISSION’S PROPOSALS
DODANA VREDNOST PREDLOGOV KOMISIJE
Effectiveness: Results can only be achieved throughaction at EU level
Treba je uporabiti vse potenciale Evropske unije, znotraj in zunaj njenih meja.
The Union’s common objectives can only be met through a partnership between national and European levels.
•Nepovezanost:namen enotnega trga so čezmejna trgovina, vseevropska podjetja, svobodapotovanja po Uniji.
National public spending can be directed to bring huge benefits to citizens,increasing the vitality and durability of national economies through public services, educationand infrastructure; offering internal and external security; and responding to society’s choicesacross the full range of policy.
Vendar na mnogih področjih (izobraževanje in raziskave; transport, energija, informacijska tehnologija, infrastruktura in storitveni sistemi; finančne storitve; carine, civilna začita, pregon) nacionalni sistemi ostajajo precej razdrobljeni, brez povezav, mobilnostje oslabljena.
But there are limits to the effectiveness of national action.
Zaradi tega ni izkoričen potencial glede koristi od svobode mobilnosti.
Gapsare left which only the EU can fill.
To ovira uspenost delovanja.
In order to reach its objectives, from the very outset the Treaty assigned a central role to fullyfledged common policies such as competition, trade, transport, agriculture and fisheries, andmore recently economic and monetary union (EMU). There cannot be a true internal market anda customs union without precise rules to establish a level playing field.
•Pomanjkanje evropske perspektive:vse prepogosto se nacionalne vlade ne znajo pravilnosoočiti s horizontalnimi vpraanji in zunanjimi zadevami, ker se politični in finančni donosi odnaložb (npr. v raziskovanje čezmejnih izobraževalnih programov, kombinirani način prevoza,upravljanje zunanjih meja, okolje ter programe in sisteme za nujno medicinsko pomoč) delijo čez mejo, pogosto po vsej Evropi, medtem ko stroke nosi samo država, ki financira dejavnost; in ker čezmejni ukrepi pomenijo dodatne težave in stroke v zvezi s koordinacijo. Tose odraža v nezadostnosti bistvenih služb in istočasno v zapravljanju virov in nekoordiniranihprizadevanjih, kar preprečuje uspenost delovanja.
•The European Union offers a unique opportunity to inject knowledge into the skills base.Different strengths and different traditions give Europe an opportunity to harvest real gainsfrom pooled experience in education and training.
•Pomanjkanje sinergije med cilji in ukrepi:cilji se sprejmejo na ravni EU in njihovo sprejetjezavezuje EU in njene države članice, da ukrepajo.
But this potential is best unlockedthrough mobility: and mobility can only be effectively handled at EU level.
Vendar na različnih ravneh ukrepanja ni organizirane, sistematične komplementarnosti.
One additional year of schooling canincrease aggregate productivity by 6.2 % for a typical European country.
Komisija zato predlaga, da se v finančni perspektivi namenijo odhodki za naslednje:
Yet over the period1995–2000, public investment in education and training as a proportion of public spending fell inmost Member States.
•Potrebne naložbe za uvedbo manjkajočih povezav, za povezovanje Evrope in omogočanjemobilnosti.
Everything must be done to lever the best effect from public spending.
•Zmanjanje pritiska na nacionalne proračune s koarico virov in boljim strokovnim znanjemna ravni EU.
Actionto support mobility will generate exchanges on a sufficiently large scale to have a real economicimpact, adding an extra dimension to the skill set of the workforce.
•Za dopolnitev, spodbuditev in katalizo doseganja ciljev.
Such a scale would be providedby action to cover some 10 % of university students through placements.
To zahteva učinkovito sinergijo medopravljenimi nalogami na različnih ravneh EU.
•The fact that complex crossborder action can only be properly handled at EU level —because of the mismatch between the distribution of (national) costs and (widespread) benefits, and because of the additional hurdles of developing crossborder infrastructure projects— was confirmed in the recent decision of the Council and the European Parliament to identify 30 priority transport projects under the ‘Trans-European network’ (TEN) programme.
V luči povedanega je Komisija preizkusila dodano vrednost s predlaganimi odhodki na vseh zadevnih političnih področjih s pomočjo političnega projekta za obdobje 2007–2013.
Thedevelopment of effective transport networksis central to a successful economy.Competitiveness gains in other sectors can be squandered if infrastructure is dogged by problems like congestion.
Za izvedbo tega preizkusa je Komisija uporabila naslednja merila, da je lahko opredelila omenjene težave:
The Gothenburg European Council in 2001 put particular emphasis on encouraging a shift from roadto more environmentally sustainable transport modes.
•Uspenost: primeri, kjer je ukrepanje EU edini način za uspeno oblikovanje manjkajočih povezav, za izognitev razdrobljenosti in za uresničitev potencialne Evrope brez meja.
Action to promote intermodality would focuson tackling road congestion in cross-frontier bottlenecks across Europe.
•Učinkovitost: primeri, kjer EU ponuja večjo strokovno učinkovitost, ker je možno identificirati stvarnost, združiti vire ali strokovno znanje in bolje uskladiti delovanje.
Actions building on the existing Marco Polo programme are estimated to take some 36 million long-distance truck journeys off theroads: this means that every euro spent would mean 6 euro of savings in terms of reduced pollutionand accidents.
•Sinergija: primeri, kjer je ukrepanje EU potrebno za dopolnitev, spodbudo in vplivanje naukrepe za zmanjanje neskladij, za povečanje standardov in za ustvarjanje sinergij.
•The very fact of European integration means that the advantages accruing to one Member State from its external operations also benefit the others and clearly justifies intervention at EU level, the EU alone also having the full range of available instruments in dealing with thirdcountries at its disposal.
Uspenost: rezultate je mogoče doseči le z ukrepanjem na ravni EU
Enlargement is a clear example: helping candidates to bring their regulatory framework in line with EU standards requires a significant effort at EU level, even if it means calling upon Member States’experience in the process (e.g. twinning).
Skupne cilje Unije je mogoče doseči le s partnerstvom med nacionalno in evropsko ravnijo.
In the western Balkans, the EU tackled both the crisis and the need for stabilisation with a degree ofefficiency unlikely to be reached by the combined action of individual Member States.
Da bi dosegla cilje, je Pogodba že od samega začetka dodelila osrednjo vlogo polno kvalificiranim skupnim politikam, kot so konkurenca, trgovina, transport, kmetijstvo in ribitvo ter nedavna EMU.
It has used amix of political dialogue, a tailor-made favourable trade regime, extensive financial programmes,cooperation in the field of justice, and democratic stabilisation measures.
Brez natančnih določil za uvedbo istih pravil igre za vse ne more biti pravega notranjega trga in carinske unije. Brez usklajevanja velike različnosti politik držav članic bi bili moraliobdržati nadzor notranjih meja, EU ne bi mogla najti skupnega jezika v mednarodni trgovini intrajnost bi utrpela spiralni padec navzdol zaradi negativne konkurence.
An example of where the potential falls short is in international financial institutions.
•Evropska unija ponuja edinstveno priložnost za vpeljevanje znanja v temelje spretnosti.
Although Member States are a majority in the Executive Board of the IMF and the World Bank in terms of numbers, they exercise much less influence than the United States.
Različne prednosti in tradicije dajejo Evropi priložnost, da požanje korist iz skupnih izkuenj napodročju izobraževanja in usposabljanja.Vendar je ta potencial najbolj učinkovito na razpolago z zagotavljanjem mobilnosti: mobilnost pa se lahko uspeno obravnava le na ravni EU.
Speaking with one voice and actingtogether is essential to increase visibility and influence.
Če ni mreže, razirjene na področju EU, sposobne izpolniti veliko tevilo zahtev za mobilnost tudentov, potem mobilnost ni možna.
Efficiency: EU action offers better value for money
Človeki kapital je ena poglavitnih determinant rasti.
EU action can also be justified on value for money grounds.
Dodatno leto izobraževanja lahko poveča skupno produktivnost tipične evropske države za 6,2 %.
One euro spent at EU level can offermore than one euro at national level.
Toda v obdobju 1995–2000 so se javne naložbev izobraževanje in usposabljanje glede na razmerje z ostalo javno porabo zmanjale v večini državčlanic.
In addition, uncoordinated spending at national level toreach common objectives is a waste of money.
Narediti je treba vse, da se pridobi najbolji učinek iz javne porabe.
In many cases, pooling resources and expertiseis an efficient way to make savings, and reach at the same time the critical mass required to deliver certain key objectives.
Ukrepi za podporo mobilnosti bodo povzročili izmenjave v zadostni meri, da bodo te imele pravi gospodarski vpliv in bodo dodale e eno dimenzijo k usposobljenosti delovne sile.