natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
I do not share that view.
S tem mnenjem se ne strinjam.
Like the Netherlands and French Governments, I think that Article 3(f) of Regulation No 1254/1999
Tako kot nizozemska in francoska vlada menim, da je treba člen 3(f) Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 razla-
That concept of a ‘suckler cow’ was clarified in Article 14 of the implementing regulation.
Pojem „krave dojilje“ je bil natančneje določen v členu 14 izvedbene uredbe.
That provision states which cows cannot be considered as suckler cows.
Ta določa, katere krave ne spadajo med krave dojilje.
must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a Member State from adopting rules imposing conditions relating to the frequency of calving and the length of suckling on producers wishing to qualify for the suckler cow premium.
gati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da država članica sprejme predpis, ki rejcem, ki želijo pridobiti premijo za kravo dojiljo, določa pogoje, ki se nana�ajo na pogostost telitve in trajanje dojenja.
However, none of the provisions of Regulation No 1254/1999 or of the implementing regulation explains what is meant by ‘suckler cow belonging to a herd intended for rearing calves for meat production’.
Kljub temu pa nobena določba Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 in izvedbene uredbe ne določa, kako je treba razumeti „kravo dojiljo, ki pripada čredi, namenjeni vzreji telet za proizvodnjo mesa“.
First of all, the Court has consistently held that, in interpreting a provision of Community law, it is necessary to consider not only its wording, but also the context in which it occurs and the objectives pursued by the rules of which it is part. 9
Uvodoma navajam ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodi�ča, v skladu s katero je treba za razlago določbe prava Skupnosti upo�tevati ne le njeno besedilo, temveč prav tako njen kontekst in namene, ki jim sledi predpis, katerega del je. 9
The concept of ‘rearing’, which may be defined as a set of techniques whereby animals are reared, by allowing them to be born and to develop in favourable circumstances, 10may be understood very differently from one Member State to another.
Pojem vzreje, ki ga je mogoče opredeliti kot celoto tehnik, s katerimi se vzrejajo živali, tako da se spodbuja njihovo rojstvo in razvoj v dobrih razmerah, 10je mogoče v državah članicah zelo različno razumeti.
It is clear from the wording of Article 3(f) of Regulation No 1254/1999 that it does not contain any provision that expressly precludes application of conditions such as those laid down in the Regeling.
Iz presoje besedila člena 3(f) Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 izhaja, da ne vsebuje nobene določbe, ki bi izrecno nasprotovala uporabi pogojev, kakr�ne določa Regeling.
On the contrary, under Article 45 of the implementing regulation Member States are to adopt all suitable measures necessary to ensure that that regulation is applied properly.
Nasprotno, na podlagi člena 45 izvedbene uredbe države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne primerne ukrepe, da zagotovijo pravilno uporabo te uredbe.
The French Government, for example, explains in its observations that in France the minimum period for suckling a calf for meat production is four weeks or even longer if the meat is to be marketed as ‘veal from suckled
Francoska vlada na primer v svojih stali�čih navaja, da je v Franciji minimalno obdobje dojenja teleta, ki je namenjeno proi-
9 — See Case C-34/05 Schouten [2007] ECR I-1687, paragraph 25, and caselaw cited therein.
I-1687, točka 25 in navedena sodna praksa).
The calf may even be weaned quickly and fattened in order to be marketed as young bull, heifer or bullock.
Tele je lahko celo hitro odstavljeno in porejeno, da je trženo kot mladi bik, telica ali govedo.
11 is considered not to be a suckler cow.
11 ni ostalo najmanj �tiri mesece, ni mogoče govoriti o vzreji in krava ne bi mogla imeti narave dojilje.
The Commission acknowledges, moreover, that rearing methods may vary depending on the type of rearing and the breed being reared.
Komisija med drugim priznava, da se metode vzreje lahko razlikujejo glede na tip vzreje in glede na vzrejano pasmo.
12However, it provides no details as to what rearing methods make a herd a suckler herd.
12Kljub temu pa ne navaja natančnej�e opredelitve glede načina vzreje, ki daje čredi dojitveno naravo.
In its observations the Commission contends that ‘suckler nature’, which is necessary for the purposes of granting the premium for maintaining a herd of suckler cows, should be considered not at the level of individual cows but at the level of the herd as a whole.
Vendar Komisija v svojih stali�čih navaja, da dojitvene narave, ki je potrebna za dodelitev premije za vzdrževanje čred krav dojilj, ni mogoče presojati na ravni posamezne krave, temveč na ravni celotne črede.
Thus, if there is evidence to indicate that a suckler cow premium has been applied for in respect of cows that have not suckled their calves, grant of the premium will depend on whether or not the herd has retained its suckler nature.
Če obstajajo sumi / znaki, da je bila premija za kravo dojiljo zahtevana za krave, ki svojih telet niso dojile, je tako dodelitev premije odvisna od tega, ali je čreda obdržala dojitveno naravo ali ne.
The Netherlands Government therefore considers that in order to apply Regulation No 1254/1999 it is necessary to define the concept of suckler cow as regards the condition that it must belong to a herd intended for rearing calves for meat production.
Nizozemska vlada torej ocenjuje, da je treba za izvedbo Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 natančneje opredeliti pojem krave dojilje glede pogoja pripadnosti čredi, namenjeni za vzrejo telet za proizvodnjo mesa.
I do not share that view, for the following reasons.
S tem mnenjem se ne strinjam zaradi teh razlogov.
Conditions such as those laid down in the Regeling, which reflect current stockrearing practice in the Netherlands, thus make it possible to determine whether a cow belongs to such a herd and classify it as a suckler cow.
Pogoji, kakr�ne postavlja Regeling, ki izražajo običajne tehnike vzreje na Nizozem -skem, omogočajo torej preverjanje pripadnosti k taki čredi in opredelitev krave kot krave dojilje.
Thus, if the condition relating to the frequency of calving is not satisfied or if the calf has not remained with the cow for at least four months, it is not possible to bring rearing into the equation and the cow
Posledično, če pogostost telitve ni bila spo�tovana ali če tele pri kravi
11 — See paragraphs 33 and 34 of the French Government’s observations.
11 – Glej točki 33 in 34 stali�č francoske vlade.12 – Glej točko 41 stali�č Komisije.
Article 6(2) of Regulation No 1254/1999 provides that in order to qualify for the suckler cow premium a producer’s herd must comprise at lease 60% suckler cows and at most 40% heifers.
Na podlagi člena 6(2) Uredbe �t.
To my mind, compliance with those percentages is designed to ensure that the herd is a suckler herd intended for rearing calves for beef production.
1254/1999 mora čredo rejca, da bi pridobil premijo za kravo dojiljo, sestavljati najmanj 60 % krav dojilj in največ 40 % telic.
12 — See paragraph 41 of the Commission’s observations.
Po mojem mnenju je namen spo�tovanja teh odstotkov dejansko zagotoviti, da je čreda dojitvene narave ter namenjena za vzrejo telet za proizvodnjo govejega in telečjega mesa.
The Commission stated in that letter that the general rule is that a calf must remain with its mother for an average of four months and that there were shortcomings in the Netherlands inspection system because it failed to take into account that average time.
Komisija pa je v tem pismu navajala, da splo�no pravilo zahteva, da tele v povprečju ostane pri svoji materi �tiri mesece in da ima nizozemski nadzorni sistem pravno praznino, ker tega povprečnega trajanja ne upo�teva.
In the Commission’s view, that shortcoming constituted a risk because some producers might receive the premium in respect of animals that were not suckler cows at all.
Po njenem mnenju ta pravna praznina s seboj prina�a nevarnost, ker bi lahko določeno �tevilo proizvajalcev prejelo premijo za živali, ki nikakor niso krave dojilje.
However, even if the suckler nature is retained at herd level by means of those percentages, it is necessary, in order to record the 60% suckler cows, to give a detailed description of a suckler cow.
Čeprav je treba dojitveno naravo ohraniti na ravni črede zaradi razdelitve odstotkov, je vendarle treba, da bi se izračunalo 60 % krav dojilj, natančno opredeliti, kaj je krava dojilja.
That involves being able to distinguish suckler cows from other cows, such as dairy cows or heifers.
Pri tem je treba krave dojilje razlikovati od drugih krav, kot so krave molznice ali celo telice.
If that were not the case, there would be a risk that a cow would be regarded as a suckler cow even though it was not intended for the rearing of calves.
V nasprotnem primeru bi obstajala nevarnost, da bi bila krava opredeljena kot krava dojilja, čeprav ne bi bila namenjena za vzrejo telet.
The conditions laid down by the Regeling are therefore necessary, in my view, in order to recognise a suckler cow and distinguish it from cows intended for other forms of rearing.
Pogoji, ki jih postavlja Regeling, so po mojem mnenju torej potrebni, da se opredeli kravo dojiljo in se jo loči od krav, ki so namenjene za drugačno vzrejo.
That is why the Netherlands authorities amended the system of suckler cow premiums and thought it necessary to provide a more detailed definition of a suckler cow, 13since there is nothing in either Regulation No 1254/1999 or in the regulation implementing it to indicate what is meant by the concept of suckler cow ‘belonging to a herd intended for rearing calves for meat production’.
Zato so nizozemski organi spremenili program premij za kravo dojiljo in so menili, da je treba natančneje določiti opredelitev krave dojilje, 13 ker nič v Uredbi �t. 1254/1999 niti v izvedbeni uredbi ne kaže na to, kako je treba razumeti pojem krave dojilje, ki pripada čredi, namenjeni vzreji telet za proizvodnjo mesa.
The Commission subsequently stated, in a letter to the Netherlands authorities of 7 November 2002, that although there is no objection to the criterion of four months with the mother, it is nevertheless necessary to examine whether the derogation from that rule may not be attributable to an exceptional and justifiable case that does not deprive the herd of its suckler nature. In its observations it considers that the conditions relating to
Komisija je v nadaljevanju v svojem dopisu, ki ga je 7. novembra 2002 naslovila na nizozemske organe, navedla, da je treba, tudi če kriterij �tirih mesecev ob materi ni vpra�ljiv, kljub temu preveriti, ali ni treba iz tega merila izvzeti izjemne upravičene primere, ki
I note in that regard that the Commission itself, by letter of 11 April 2002, informed the Kingdom of the Netherlands that it was applying the premium scheme in the beef and veal sector incorrectly, and that is why it made a number of financial adjustments to the expenditure that the Kingdom of the Netherlands had declared.
Glede tega bi želel navesti, da je Komisija sama z dopisom z dne 11. aprila 2002 seznanila Kraljevino Nizozemsko, da slabo uporablja program premij v sektorju govejega in telečjega mesa, in je zato sprejela nekatere finančne popravke glede odhodkov, ki jih je slednja prijavila.
According to the Commission, an inspection conducted in respect of the entire territory of the Netherlands revealed that 24.6% of calves that had qualified for the suckler cow premium left the undertaking during the first four months after their birth.
Po navedbah Komisije je nadzor nad celotnim nizozemskim območjem pokazal, da je 24,6 % telet, za katere je bila dodeljena premija za kravo dojiljo, zapustilo podjetja v �tirih mesecih po svojem rojstvu.
That view is confirmed, in my opinion, by the objective and scheme of the Community provisions in question.
čredi ne odvzamejo njene dojitvene narave. V svojih stali�čih je navedla, da sta pogoja, ki se nana�ata na pogostost telitve in trajanje dojenja, preveč stroga in ne omogočata upo�tevanja izjemnih upravičenih primerov, kot je pogin teleta.
The general scheme of premiums for maintaining a herd of suckler cows is a tool designed to stabilise the markets and ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community.
Ponavljam, da je splo�ni program premij za vzdrževanje čred krav dojilj instrument, ki je namenjen stabilizaciji trgov v tem sektorju in zagotavljanju primernega življenjskega standarda kmetom.
That is why a global scheme of direct payments to producers was introduced in 1999.
Zato je bil leta 1999 ustanovljen globalni sistem neposrednih plačil proizvajalcem.
That scheme involves payments direct to the producer, in the form of suckler cow premiums, subject to compliance with the minimum number of suckler cows in the herd, namely at least 60% suckler cows.
Ta sistem deluje tako, da se podjetniku za kravo dojiljo plača neposredno v obliki premij, katerih izplačilo je podrejeno izpolnitvi pogoja minimalnega �tevila krav dojilj v čredi, to je vsaj 60 % krav dojilj.
In my view, there is nothing in the application of those conditions to prevent a producer from relying on such circumstances if he can show that the calf was removed from its mother due to force majeure or if removal is due to exceptional circumstances.
Po mojem mnenju ni ničesar v načinu uporabe teh pogojev, kar bi rejcu preprečevalo, da se sklicuje na take okoli�čine, če je izkazal, da je bilo tele od matere odstavljeno zaradi vi�je sile ali da je do odstavitve pri�lo zaradi izrednih okoli�čin.
In order to ensure that such a system is fully effective, Member States must take the measures necessary to satisfy themselves that transactions financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) are actually carried out and are executed correctly, and prevent and deal with irregularities. 14
Države članice morajo za popolno učinkovitost takega sistema zagotoviti resničnost in pravilnost operacij, ki jih financira Evropski kmetijski usmerjevalni in jamstveni sklad (EKUJS), tako, da za to sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe kot tudi da preprečijo in preganjajo nepravilnosti. 14
In other words, the purpose of the integrated administration and control system is to ensure, in particular, that the suckler cow premium is actually paid in respect of
Z drugimi besedami, namen integriranega upravnega in nadzornega sistema je
14 — See second recital of the implementing regulation, which refers expressly to the first recital of Regulation No 3508/92.
14 – Glej drugo uvodno izjavo izvedbene uredbe, ki izrecno napotuje na prvo uvodno izjavo Uredbe �t. 3508/92.
since a heifer is a female bovine animal belonging to a meat breed which has not yet calved.
predvsem zagotoviti, da se premija za kravo dojiljo dejansko izplača za kravo, ki je namenjena vzreji teleta za proizvodnjo mesa.
Moreover, we have seen that under Articles 36 and 38 of Regulation No 2419/2001, if it is found that the number of suckler cows declared in the application is higher than the number actually found on the producer’s holding because some of the cows do not meet the necessary requirements, premiums may be reduced or excluded.
Med drugim je bilo že predstavljeno, da se na podlagi členov 36 in 38 Uredbe �t.
Accordingly, the conditions laid down by the Regeling appear to me to be in accordance with the objective and scheme of the relevant legislative provisions.
Tako se mi zdijo pogoji, ki jih določa Regeling, v skladu z namenom in sistemom obravnavanih uredbenih določb.
The objectives of Regulation No 1254/1999 would therefore be undermined if a premium were paid, for example, in respect of a cow which is intended only for milk production, which, as we have seen, may be the case if the calf is removed only a few weeks after birth.
Cilji Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 bi bili torej ogroženi, če bi bila premija izplačana na primer za kravo, ki je namenjena zgolj proizvodnji mleka, kar je, kot je bilo predstavljeno, mogoče, če je tele odstavljeno samo nekaj tednov po rojstvu.
The Commission itself accepts this in its working document of 16 December 1999.
Komisija to sama priznava v svojem delovnem dokumentu z dne 16. decembra 1999.
15It acknowledges that the absence of calves on the holding may lead to the conclusion that there are no calves intended for meat production being reared and that all the cows belong to the dairy herd.
15Priznava, da premalo telet na gospodarstvu lahko kaže na to, da ni vzreje telet, ki bi bila namenjena proizvodnji mesa, in da vse krave pripadajo čredi molznic.
In the light of all those factors, I consider that Article 3(f) of Regulation No 1254/1999 does not preclude a Member State from making the grant of the suckler cow premium subject to a condition relating to the frequency of calving and the condition that the cow has suckled its calf for at least four months.
Glede na celoto vseh teh elementov ocenjujem, da člen 3(f) Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 ne nasprotuje temu, da država članica dodelitev premije za kravo dojiljo pogojuje z izpolnitvijo pogoja, ki se nana�a na pogostost telitve, in pogoja, da je krava svoje tele dojila vsaj �tiri mesece.
Moreover, the condition relating to the frequency of calving makes it possible to ensure that the cow is not a heifer.
Med drugim se lahko na podlagi pogoja, ki se nana�a na pogostost telitve, zagotovi, da krava ni telica.
According to Articles 3(g) and 6(6) of Regulation No 1254/1999, the only thing which distinguishes a heifer from a suckler cow is calving,
Na podlagi členov 3(g) in 6(6) Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 je edino, kar loči telico od krave dojilje, telitev, ker je telica žensko
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)28 February 2008 *
SODBA SODIŠČA (tretji senat) z dne 28. februarja 2008 *
2008 — CASE C-446/06
2008 – ZADEVA C-446/06 generalni pravobranilec: Y.
Advocate General: Y. Bot, Registrar: R. Grass, having regard to the written procedure, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
Bot, sodni tajnik: R. Grass, na podlagi pisnega postopka, ob upo�tevanju stali�č, ki so jih predložili:
— the French Government, by G. de Bergues and A.-L. During, acting as Agents,
– za francosko vlado G. de Bergues in A.-L. During, zastopnika,
— the Commission of the European Communities, by F. Erlbacher and M. van Heezik, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 6 December 2007,
– za Komisijo Evropskih skupnosti F. Erlbacher in M. van Heezik, zastopnika, po predstavitvi sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca na obravnavi z dne 6. decembra 2007
WINKEL gives the following
WINKEL izreka naslednjo
This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 3(f) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (OJ 1999 L 160, p.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na razlago člena 3(f) Uredbe Sveta (ES) �t. 1254/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za goveje in telečje meso (UL L 160, str.
1) (‘Regulation No 1254/1999’).
1, v nadaljevanju: Uredba �t. 1254/1999).
Article 3(f) and (g) of Regulation No 1254/1999 defines the terms ‘suckler cow’ and ‘heifer’ as follows:
V členu 3(f) oziroma (g) Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 sta opredeljena izraza „krava dojilja“ in „telica“ tako:
2008 — CASE C-446/06
2008 – ZADEVA C-446/06
‘(f) suckler cow shall mean a cow belonging to a meat breed or born of a cross with a meat breed, and belonging to a herd intended for rearing calves for meat production,
„(f) krava dojilja pomeni kravo, ki pripada mesni pasmi ali je rojena s križanjem z mesno pasmo in ki pripada čredi, namenjeni za vzrejo telet za prirejo mesa;
(g) heifer shall mean a female bovine animal from the age of eight months which has not yet calved.’
(g) telica pomeni žensko govedo od starosti osmih mesecev, ki �e ni telila.“
The first and fifth subparagraphs of Article 6(2) and Article 6(3) and (7) of Regulation No 1254/1999 provide:
V členu 6(2), prvi in peti pododstavek, ter (3) in (7) Uredbe �t. 1254/1999 je določeno:
The suckler cow premium shall be granted to any producer:
Premija za krave dojilje se odobri vsakemu proizvajalcu:
… provided that he keeps, for at least six consecutive months from the day on which the application is lodged a number of suckler cows at least equal to 60% and of heifers at most equal to 40% of the number for which the premium was requested.
[…] pod pogojem, da ima v reji najmanj �est zaporednih mesecev od dneva, ko vloži zahtevek, tolik�no �tevilo krav dojilj, da to zna�a najmanj 60 % �tevila, in tolik�no �tevilo telic, da ne presega 40 % �tevila, za katero se je zahtevala premija.
For the purposes of determining the number of eligible animals … whether cows belong to a suckler herd or to a dairy herd shall be established on the basis of the
Da bi ugotovili, koliko živali izpolnjuje pogoje […], se na podlagi upravičenčeve individualne referenčne količine, kakor je opredeljeno v členu 16(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) �t.
48] and the average milk yield.
48] in povprečne mlečnosti, ugotavlja, ali krave spadajo v čredo dojilj ali v mlečno čredo.
The producers’ entitlement to the premium shall be limited by the application of an individual ceiling as defined in Article 7.
Zahtevek za premijo vsakega proizvajalca je omejen z najvi�jo individualno mejo, opredeljeno v členu 7.
Detailed rules for the application of this Article and, in particular, those relating to the definition of the concept of suckler cow referred to in Article 3 shall be adopted and the average milk yield shall be determined by the Commission in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 43.’
Podrobna pravila za uporabo tega člena in zlasti pravila, ki se nana�ajo na opredelitev pojma krava dojilja iz člena 3 in [določajo] povprečno mlečnost, določi Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 43.“
30) (‘the implementing regulation’) defines ‘cows belonging to a meat breed’ in Article 14:
30, v nadaljevanju: izvedbena uredba) je v členu 14 opredeljen pojem „krave mesnih pasem“:
‘Cows belonging to the bovine breeds set out in Annex I to this Regulation shall not be considered to be cows belonging to a meat breed as referred to in Articles 3(f) … of Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999.’
„Krave govejih pasem, določenih v Prilogi I k tej uredbi, ne spadajo k mesnim pasmam iz členov 3(f) […] Uredbe (ES) �t. 1254/1999.“
Under Article 45 of that regulation, Member States are required to adopt all suitable measures necessary to ensure that that regulation is applied properly.
V členu 45 te uredbe je določeno, da države članice sprejmejo vse ustrezne predpise za zagotovitev pravilne uporabe te uredbe.
11) provides for reductions and even exclusions in respect of the aid applied for where controls reveal irregularities in the aid application.
11), so predvidena znižanja pomoči, celo izključitev te pomoči, če kontrola izkaže nepravilnosti v zahtevku za pomoč.
Article 41 of that regulation, however, allows account to be taken of natural circumstances such as the death of an animal as a consequence of a disease or an accident for which the farmer cannot be held responsible.
Vendar se s členom 41 te uredbe dopu�ča upo�tevanje vpliva naravnih okoli�čin, kot je pogin živali zaradi bolezni ali nesreče, za katero nosilec kmetijskega gospodarstva ne more nositi odgovornosti.
Article 48 of that regulation provides, in addition, for account to be taken of cases of force majeure and exceptional circumstances.
V členu 48 navedene uredbe je poleg tega predvideno upo�tevanje vi�je sile in izrednih okoli�čin.
Article 1(p) of the Rules on EC animal premiums (Regeling dierlijke EG-premies), as amended by decision of 30 July 2002 (Staatscourant 2002, No 143, p.
V uredbi o premijah Skupnosti za živali (Regeling dierlijke EG-premies), kot je bila spremenjena z določbo z dne 30. julija 2002 (Stcrt. 2002, �t. 143, str.