natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Service of the application on the defendant by the Registry
Sodno tajništvo tožbo vroči toženi stranki
Court of Justice of the European Communities : www.curia.europa.eu Case-law: www.curia.europa.eu/en/content/juris/index.htm Press releases: www.curia.europa.eu/en/actu/communiques/index.htm Portal of the institutions of the European Union: www.europa.eu Community legislation (EUR-Lex) : www.eur-lex.europa.eu
Sodišče Evropskih Skupnosti: www.curia.europa.eu Sodna praksa: www.curia.europa.eu/fr/content/juris/index.htm Sporočila za medije: www.curia.europa.eu/fr/actu/communiques/index.htm Portal institucij Evropske unije: www.europa.eu Zakonodaja Skupnosti (EUR-Lex): www.eur-lex.europa.eu
Notice of the action in the Official Journal of the European Union (Series C)
Obvestilo o tožbi v Uradnem listu EU (serija C)
(Official publication of the subject-matter of the application and the forms of order sought, available approximately six weeks from the day on which the action is brought before the Tribunal)* www.curia.europa.eu
(Uradna objava predmeta in predlogov tožbe, ki so na voljo v vseh jezikih približno šest tednov od dne, ko je bila zadeva predložena v odločanje Sodišču za uslužbence)* www.curia.europa.eu
[Intervention]
(Začasni ukrepi)
At all stages of the procedure
Odgovor na tožbo (Ugovor nedopustnosti)
Defence[objection of inadmissibility] the Tribunal may try to reach an amicable settlement
V vseh fazah postopka lahko Sodišče za uslužbence
European Union Civil Service Tribunal of the dispute between
Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije
Proceedings for interim measures B r ing ing an action before the Tribunal does not cause the operation of the contested act to be suspended.
Sodnik poročevalec pripravi predhodno poročilo spora med strankami.
Allocation of the case to a Chamber and designation of the Judge-Rapporteur
Dodelitev zadeve senatu in določitev sodnika poročevalca
The Judge-Rapporteur prepares the preliminary report the parties.
Sodišče za uslužbence pa vendar lahko odredi začasno odložitev izvršitve ali predpiše druge začasne ukrepe.
Postal address:Registry of the Civil Service Tribunal L-2925 Luxembourg
Poštni naslov:Sodno tajništvo Sodišča za uslužbence L-2925 Luxembourg
Interim measures are granted only if three conditions are met:1) the substance of the main proceedings must appear, at first sight, to be well founded;2) the applicant must establish the urgency of the measures in the absence of which he would suffer serious and irreparable harm;3) the interim measures must take account of the weighing up of the parties’ interests and the public interest.
Začasni ukrepi se odobrijo samo, kadar so izpolnjeni trije pogoji: 1. tožba mora biti videti na prvi pogled utemeljena; 2. vlagatelj mora dokazati nujnost ukrepov, pri čemer bi brez njih lahko utrpel težjo in nepopravljivo škodo; 3. začasni ukrepi morajo upoštevati ravnovesje med interesi strank in splošnim interesom.
Preparatory report for the hearing
Obravnava Poročilo za obravnavo
(Document drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur containing the essential elements of the case and indicating, where appropriate, the points on which the parties are to focus their arguments)**
Sklep je začasen in z njim Sodišče za uslužbence ne vpliva na odločitev Sodišča za uslužbence v postopku v glavni stvari. Poleg tega je lahko tudi predmet pritožbe pri predsedniku Sodišča prve stopnje.
The order is provisional in nature and in no way prejudges the decision of the Tribunal in the main proceedings. In addition, an appeal against it may be brought before the President of the Court of First Instance.
(Dokument, ki ga pripravi sodnik poročevalec, ki vsebuje bistvene podatke o zadevi in, glede na okoliščine primera, v katerem so navedene točke, na katere se morajo stranke osredotočiti pri ustnih navedbah)**
Judgment* or order* (in the case of an order, there is never an oral phase)
Sodba* ali sklep*(v primeru sklepa se ustni del nikoli ne opravi)
Language arrangements The language used for the application, which may be one of the 23 official languages of the European Union, will be the language of the case.
Jezikovna ureditev Jezik, ki se uporabi za tožbo, ki je lahko eden izmed 23 uradnih jezikov Evropske unije, bo jezik postopka zadeve.
January 2007 edition
Izdaja: januar 2007
The optional stages of the procedure are shown in brackets.
Neobvezne stopnje postopka so navedene v oklepajih.
* These documents are available on the internet: the Court’s: website (www.curia.europa.eu), base EUR-Lex (from site www.europa.eu).
* Ti dokumenti so na voljo na internetu: spletna stran Sodišča (www.curia.europa.eu), baza EUR-Lex (na strani www.europa.eu).
The proceedings in the oral phase of the procedure are simultaneously interpreted, as necessary, into various official languages of the European Union.
Razprave, ki potekajo med ustnim delom postopka, se glede na potrebe simultano tolmačijov različne uradne jezike Evropske unije.
The judges deliberate without interpreters in a common language, French.
Sodniki se posvetujejo brez tolmačev v skupnem jeziku, ki je francoščina.
** These documents are to be found in display racks by the courtroom or may be obtained from the Court of Justice’s Press and Information Service, on request.
** Ti dokumenti so na voljo na razstavni polici pri razpravni dvorani in pri službi Mediji in informacije Sodišča na zahtevo.
Other documents are not public.
Drugi dokumenti niso javni.
HISTORY
ZGODOVINA
The written phase An application, drawn up by a lawyer and sent to the Registry, opens the proceedings.
Pisni del Postopek se začne s pisno tožbo, ki jo sestavi odvetnik in ki je naslovljena na sodno tajništvo.
The Registrar sends the application to the opposing party.
Sodni tajnik tožbo posreduje nasprotni stranki.
The latter has a period of two months to file a defence.
Ta lahko v roku dveh mesecev vloži odgovor na tožbo.
The Tribunal may decide that a second exchange of pleadings is necessary.
Sodišče za uslužbence lahko odloči, da je potrebna druga izmenjava pisnih vlog.
The Civil Service Tribunal is composed of seven Judges appointed by the Council for a period of six years which may be renewed, following a call for applications and after taking the opinion of a committee of seven persons chosen from among former members of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance and lawyers of recognised competence.
Sodišče za uslužbence sestavlja sedem sodnikov, ki jih imenuje Svet, za dobo šestih let z možnostjo ponovnega imenovanja, po pozivu k oddaji kandidatur in po mnenju odbora, ki ga sestavlja sedem osebnosti, izbranih med nekdanjimi člani Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje ter priznanimi pravniki.
For the building of Europe the Member States (now 27 in number) have concluded treaties creating first the European Communities and then a European Union, with institutions adopting laws in specified areas which directly form part of the national legal systems.
Na prvi stopnji je pristojno za odločanje v sporih med Skupnostmi in njihovimi zaposlenimi na podlagi člena 236 ES, kar pomeni približno 150 zadev na leto za osebje institucij Skupnosti s približno 35.000 osebami.
These disputes concern not only questions to do with working relations in the strict sense (pay, career progress, recruitment, disciplinary measures etc.), but also the social security system (sickness, old age, invalidity, accidents at work, family allowances etc.).
Za oblikovanje Evrope so države (danes jih je sedemindvajset) med seboj sklenile pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropskih skupnosti, nato Evropsko unijo, z institucijami, ki na določenih področjih sprejemajo pravna pravila, ki so neposredno vključena v nacionalna prava.
When appointing the Judges, the Council ensures a balanced composition of the Tribunal on as broad a geographical basis as possible from among nationals of the Member States and with respect to the national legal systems represented.
Pri imenovanju sodnikov Svet skrbi za ravnovesje pri sestavi Sodišča za uslužbence na najširši mogoči geografski podlagi med državljani držav članic in glede na zastopane nacionalne pravne sisteme.
Any person who can prove an interest in the outcome of a case before the Tribunal, as well as the Member States and the Community institutions, may intervene in the proceedings.
Vse osebe, ki so utemeljeno zainteresirane za rešitev spora, o katerem odloča Sodišče za uslužbence, pa tudi institucije Skupnosti in države članice lahko intervenirajo v postopku.
The intervener files a statement in intervention, supporting or opposing the claims of one of the parties, to which the latter may then respond.
Intervenient vloži vlogo, s katero podpira ali zavrača predloge ene izmed strank, na katero lahko slednje odgovorijo.
The intervener may also submit his observations at the oral phase.
Intervenient lahko tudi predstavi svoja stališča med ustnim postopkom.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities is the Community judicial institution.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je sodna institucija Skupnosti.
It consists of three bodies: the Court of Justice, the Court of First Instance and the Civil Service Tribunal.
Sestavljena je iz treh sodišč: Sodišča, Sodišča prve stopnje in Sodišča za uslužbence.
It also has jurisdiction in cases concerning certain specific employees, in particular, those of Eurojust, Europol, the European Central Bank and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM).
Pristojno je tudi za spore določenega posebnega osebja, zlasti osebja Eurojusta, Europola, Evropske centralne banke in Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (UUNT).
The Judges of the Tribunal elect their President from among their number for a term of three years which may be renewed.
Sodniki med svojimi člani imenujejo predsednika Sodišča za uslužbence za dobo treh let. Lahko je ponovno imenovan.
On the other hand, it may not hear and determine cases between national administrations and their employees.
Vendar pa ne odloča o sporih med nacionalnimi upravami in njihovimi zaposlenimi.
It was on the basis of the Treaty of Nice, which entered into force on 1 February 2003 and provided for the creation of judicial panels in certain specific areas, that the Council of the European Union decided in 2004 to create the Civil Service Tribunal, whose task it is to rule on disputes between the European Communities and their staff.
Na podlagi Pogodbe iz Nice, ki je začela veljati prvega februarja 2003 in ki je predvidela ustanovitev sodnih senatov na določenih področjih, je Svet Evropske unije leta 2004 odločil, da ustanovi Sodišče za uslužbence, katerega naloga je odločanje v sporih med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi zaposlenimi.
The Tribunal sits in Chambers of three Judges.
Sodišče za uslužbence zaseda v senatih treh sodnikov.
However, whenever the difficulty or importance of the questions of law raised justifies it, a case may be referred to the full court.
Kadar to upravičujejo zahtevna ali pomembna pravna vprašanja, se lahko zadevo predloži v odločanje občni seji.
Furthermore, in certain cases to be determined by its Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal may sit in a Chamber of five Judges or as a single Judge.
Poleg tega lahko Sodišče za uslužbence v določenih primerih, ki se določijo z njegovim poslovnikom, odloča v senatu petih sodnikov ali pa odloča sodnik posameznik.
The oral phase During the oral phase a public hearing is usually held.
Ustni del Med ustnim delom poteka običajno javna obravnava.
During the hearing, the Judges can put questions to the parties’ representatives and, where appropriate, to the parties themselves.
Med glavno obravnavo lahko sodniki postavljajo vprašanja predstavnikom strank in, če teh ni, strankam.
The Judge-Rapporteur draws up a preliminary report for the hearing, containing the essential points in the case and indicating the points on which the parties are to focus their arguments.
Sodnik poročevalec pripravi predhodno poročilo o obravnavi, ki vsebuje bistvene podatke o zadevi in v katerem so navedene točke, na katere se morajo stranke osredotočiti pri ustnih navedbah.
This document is available to the public in the language of the case.
Ta dokument je na voljo javnosti v jeziku postopka.
The Judges appoint a Registrar for a term of six years.The Tribunal has its own Registry, but makes use of the services of the Court of Justice for its other administrative and linguistic needs.
Sodniki imenujejo sodnega tajnika, čigar mandat traja šest let.Sodišče za uslužbence ima na voljo svoje sodno tajništvo, vendar se pri drugih upravnih in jezikovnih potrebah opira na službe Sodišča.
The Judges deliberate on the basis of draft grounds prepared by the Judge-Rap-porteur.
Sodniki se posvetujejo na podlagi osnutka razlogov, ki ga pripravi sodnik poročevalec.
The judgment is delivered at a public hearing.
Sodba se razglasi na javni obravnavi.
The procedure before the Tribunal is governed by the provisions of the Statute of the Court of Justice, in particular those contained in Annex I thereto.
Poleg tega Sodišče za uslužbence do začetka veljavnosti njegovega poslovnika smiselno uporablja Poslovnik Sodišča prve stopnje, z izjemo določb o sodniku posamezniku.
Moreover, until its own Rules of Procedure enter into force, the Tribunal will apply mutatis mutandis the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, save for the provisions relating to the single Judge.
Sodišče za uslužbence je, znotraj sodne institucije Skupnosti, specializirano za področje uslužbenskih sporov Evropske unije, to pristojnost je najprej izvajalo Sodišče, od njegove ustanovitve leta 1989 pa Sodišče prve stopnje.
Costs The procedure before the Tribunal is free of court fees.
Stroški postopka Postopek pred Sodiščem za uslužbence je oproščen stroškov.
On the other hand, the costs of the lawyer entitled to appear before a court in a Member State, by whom the parties must be represented, are not paid by the Tribunal.
Vendar pa Sodišče za uslužbence ne prevzame stroškov za odvetnika, ki je pooblaščen za zastopanje strank pred sodiščem države članice, ki mora zastopati stranke.
A party who is not able to meet the costs of the case may, however, apply for legal aid.
Stranka, ki ne more poravnati stroškov postopka, lahko zaprosi za pravno pomoč.
The new buildings of the Court of Justice of the European Communities
Sodišče Evropskih skupnostiv novi sodni palači
ORIGINAL PALAIS
STARA SODNA PALAČA
Preface hile the task entrusted to the Court of Justice, which was to ensure “that in the interpretation and application of [the treaties] the law is observed”, has remained unchanged since 1952, the constant rise in the number of cases brought before it, the expansion of its staff and the creation within it of two other courts have led the oldest of the institutions of the Union to be perceived as an institution
Spremna beseda edtem ko naloga Sodišča, zagotavljati „spoštovanje prava pri uporabi in razlagi ustanovnih pogodb“, ostaja od leta 1952 nespremenje- na, pa se zaradi stalnega povečevanja števila predloženih zadev, vse več njegovega osebja in vzpostavitve dveh drugih sodišč v njegovem okviru zdi, da je ta najstarejša institucija Unije ujeta v nenehen vrtinec sprememb.
That impression is bolstered by the successive building projects undertaken over the last 30 years to meet the ever-growing need for space which have left the institution at the centre of a permanent building site.
Tak vtis je še močnejši zato, ker se je v zadnjih tridesetih letih zaradi vse večjih prostorskih potreb neprestano gradilo, zaradi česar je bila institucija tako rekoč stalno sredi gradbišča.
It is the aim of this book to help the reader to discover or learn more about certain aspects of the work of the Court of Justice by inviting him on a guided tour of its new buildings.
Namen te knjižice je bralca s slikovnim gradivom stavb nove sodne palače in pojasnili seznaniti z nekaterimi vidiki delovanja Sodišča.
At each stage of this visit to the new property complex, consisting of the original courthouse (the “Palais”), the peristyle building (“Anneau”), the Towers and the Gallery, an explanation will be given, illustrated by the excellent photographs of Georges Fessy, of the function of each place and the role of its occupants in the dynamic of the institution.
Ob prikazu novega stavbnega kompleksa, ki je sestavljen iz nekdanje sodne palače, obroča, stolpov in galerije, bosta ob čudovitih fotograjah Georgesa Fessyja pojasnjena namen vsakega prostora in vloga v njem nastanjenih oseb za delovanje institucije.
In the course of the visit, the reader will recognise the iconic and traditional features of a Court, adapted here to the demands of multilingualism, and find answers to his questions about the scale of the buildings and the staff working there.
Bralec bo lahko med tem ogledom prepoznal simbolne in tradicionalne lastnosti prostorov sodne palače, ki so prilagojene delu v več jezikih, in se seznanil z natančnimi podatki v številkah o prostorih in osebju.
For a long time, the Court had no purpose-built courthouse.
Sodišče dolgo ni imelo sodne palače.
The inauguration of its first Palais in 1973, after 20 years of short-term solutions, was an event whose importance came to be reected in the undeniable attachment of the Members of the Court and its staff to the building itself.
Slovesno odprtje njegove prve sodne palače leta 1973, po dvajsetih letih kratkotrajnih rešitev, je bilo pomemben dogodek, katerega pomen se kaže tudi v povezanosti članov Sodišča in njegovega osebja s sodno palačo.
Thus, the Court was delighted to learn in 1994 of the decision of the authorities of the Grand Duchy to renovate this iconic building rather than knock it down, which would allow the architect, Dominique Perrault, to place it at the heart of his project in the role of original Palais, devoted entirely to the public aspect of judicial activity.
Zato je Sodišče leta 1994 z zadovoljstvom pozdravilo odločitev organov Velikega vojvodstva, da se bo ta simbolna stavba obnovila, in ne podrla, kar je arhitektu Dominiquu Perraultu omogočilo, da jo je umestil v središče svojega projekta in je zdaj kot stara sodna palača v celoti posvečena javnemu vidiku sojenja.
This is why, as it takes possession of its new Palais, the Court must thank the authorities of the Grand Duchy on two counts, first for responding to its request for the construction of an infrastructure conducive to the smooth operation of the judicial institution of an enlarged Union with 27 Member States, and second for allowing it to have its own history reected in that of its buildings.
Zato Sodišče ob prevzemu nove sodne palače izreka dvojno zahvalo Velikemu vojvodstvu, in sicer ker je ugodilo njegovi prošnji za gradnjo infrastrukture, primerne dobremu delovanju sodne institucije razširjene Unije sedemindvajsetih držav članic, in ker je omogočilo, da se zgodovina Sodišča prepleta z zgodovino njegovih stavb.
Vassilios SKOURISPresident of the Court of Justice of the European Communities
Vassilios SKOURISPredsednik Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti
1952-1972 hile there had been some discussion as to whether the European
Od 1952 do 1972 eta 1952 so potekali pogovori o tem, ali naj imajo institucije
Coal and Steel Community institutions and, therefore, the Court were to have their seat in Liège or Brussels, the city of Luxembourg was finally chosen on a provisional basis in 1952.
Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo sedež v Liègeu ali Bruslju,
Moreover, in 1958 the Court of the European Coal and Steel Community became the “single” Court of the European Communities, resulting in an increase in jurisdiction and also sta.
Avgusta 1959 je luksemburška vlada privolila, da se lahko Sodišče vseli v stavbo luksemburške škoje na Côte d'Eich, ki je bila dovolj velika, da so imele v njej prostore vse njegove službe.
This provisional arrangement was only conrmed at the Edinburgh European Council of 12 December 1992 when the seats of the institutions, including that of the Court, became denitive.
nazadnje pa so za sedež Sodišča začasno izbrali mesto Luxembourg.
In August 1959 the Luxembourg Government agreed to make available to the Court a building belonging to the Bishopric of Luxembourg, located on the Côte d’Eich, which was large enough to accommodate all its departments.
Sedež Sodišča in drugih institucij je postal dokončen šele na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Edinburghu 12. decembra 1992.
When it was decided, at the end of the 1960s, that all the Community institutions were to be located on the Kirchberg Plateau, a plan was formed to construct a building for the Court of Justice which, both functionally and symbolically, would convey the image of a court.
Konec šestdesetih let je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se vse institucije preselijo v mestno četrt Kirchberg, in porajala se je zamisel, da bi za Sodišče zgradili stavbo, ki bi funkcionalno in simbolno delovala kot sedež sodišča.
However, in 1952, it was not the provisional nature of the seat which hindered the installation of the Court but the diculty of finding suitable premises to house the Court and its departments.
Vendar leta 1952 nastanitve Sodišča ni ovirala začasnost izbire sedeža, ampak težave pri iskanju stavb, primernih za delovanje Sodišča in njegovih služb.
At that time, the city of Luxembourg boasted no buildings large enough for each institution of the European Coal and Steel Community to accommodate its departments under one roof.
Mesto Luxembourg takrat namreč ni imelo dovolj velikih stavb, da bi lahko vsaka institucija Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo nastanila svoje službe pod isto streho.
And so was born the project of the first Palais for the Court of Justice, designed by the Belgian architects Jamagne and Vander Elst along with the Luxembourg architect Conzemius.
Tako je nastal načrt za prvo sodno palačo, katere zasnovo so zaupali belgijskima arhitektoma Jamagnu in Vanderju Elstu ter luksemburškemu arhitektu Conzemiusu.
Three buildings were eventually made available to the Court: the Villa Vauban, for the chambers of the seven Judges and two Advocates General; the Hamilius Building, for the language service – the first in the history of the European Communities – and the Maison Hellinkx, for the administration and the library.
Najprej je bila sprejeta odločitev, da dobi Sodišče v uporabo tri stavbe: vilo Vauban za kabinete sedmih sodnikov in dveh generalnih pravobranilcev, stavbo Hamilius za potrebe jezikovne službe – prve v zgodovini Evropskih skupnosti – in hišo Hellinkx za upravo in knjižnico.
The premises of the Court of Justice on the Côte d’Eich (1959-1972).
Nastanitev Sodišča v stavbo na Côte d’Eich (1959–1972)
THE NEW BUILDINGS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
SODIŠČE EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI V NOVI SODNI PALAČI
“Would it be too daring, or pretentious, to suggest that the genius loci, the calm placidity of the Luxembourg environment, has at least something to do with the success of an institution which, by its very nature, would not function well in an atmosphere of anxiety and harassment.
„Bi bilo predrzno ali domišljavo namigovati na to, da je značilnost izbranega kraja, in sicer mirnost luksemburškega okolja, vsaj malo vplivala na uspeh institucije, ki bi delovala slabo v stresnem in napetem ozračju?
We therefore wanted this building to be designed in such a way as to reect, by its setting and its layout, that need for detachment, for tranquillity, for distance from the merely contingent and for an opportunity to embark on an internal journey of study and meditation.
Zatosmo želeli, da bi bila ta stavba zasnovana tako, da s svojo lego in ureditvijo izraža ta namen porazbremenitvi, spokojnostiin ločevanju zrna odplevela in po notranjem potovanju študija in meditacije.
The rigidity of its special steel skeleton, naturally immune to corrosion, like the body of European legal theory to be derived from your case-law, contrasts with the play of light and the manifold reections from the great expanse of glass.
Strogost njenega ogrodja iz nerjavečega jekla – kar je dobra prispodoba evropske doktrine, ki bo nastala z vašo sodno prakso – je ublažena z igro luči in številnih odsevov, razpršenih skozi velike steklene stene.
With this luminous window on the outside world, the Court cannot be unaware of the simple facts of Community life.
S tem svetlim oknom Sodišče ne bo moglo prezreti dejanskega življenja Skupnosti.