natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The latter would be invested with legal personality for the implementation of territorial cooperation programmes based on a convention agreed between the participating national, regional, local or other public authorities.
Ti organi bi izvajali programe ozemeljskega sodelovanja kot pravne osebe in na podlagi konvencije med sodelujočimi nacionalnimi, regionalnimi, lokalnimi ali drugimi javnimi organi.
• The European Territorial Cooperation objective will strengthen cross-border cooperation through joint local
• Cilj evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja je okrepiti
Objectives, eligible regions and instruments
Cilji, upravičene regije in instrumenti
During the 2007-2013 period, the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund will contribute to three objectives: Convergence (ERDF; ESF and Cohesion Fund), Regional Competitiveness and Employment (ERDF; ESF) and European Territorial Cooperation (ERDF).
V obdobju 2007–2013 bodo ESRR, ESS in Kohezijski sklad prispevali k trem ciljem: konvergenca (ESRR; ESS in Kohezijski sklad), regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje (ESRR; ESS) ter evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje (ESRR).
Based on a regional GDP below 75% of the EU average, regions are eligible for the Convergence objective while all and regional initiatives, transnational cooperation aiming at integrated territorial development, and interregional cooperation and exchange of experience.
Regije, katerih BDP je pod 75 % regijskega povprečja EU, so upravičene do cilja konvergence, medtem ko imajo vse druge regije dostop do cilja regionalne konkurenč- čezmejno sodelovanje s skupnimi lokalnimi in regionalnimi pobudami, transnacionalno sodelovanje z namenom povezanega ozemeljskega razvoja ter medregijsko sodelovanje in izmenjavo izkušenj.
The population living in cross-border areas amounts to 181.7 million (37.5% of the total EU population), whereas all EU regions and citizens are covered by one of the existing 13 transnational cooperation areas.
181,7 milijona prebivalcev živi v čezmejnih območjih (37,5 % celotnega prebivalstva EU), medtem ko so vse regije in državljani EU zajeti z enim od 13 območij transnacionalnega sodelovanja.
EUR 7.75 billion (2.5% of the total) available for this objective is split as follows:
Za ta cilj je na voljo 7,75 milijarde EUR (2,5 % celotnih sredstev), znesek pa je razdeljen na naslednji način: 5,57 milijarde
EUR 5.57 billion for cross-border, EUR 1.58 billion for transnational and EUR 392 million for interregional co-operation.
EUR za čezmejno, 1,58 milijarde EUR za transnacionalno in 392 milijonov EUR za medregijsko sodelovanje.
Concentrating cohesion instruments on priority themes
Osredotočanje kohezijskih instrumentov na prednostne teme
The General Regulation provides for a new concentration of cohesion expenditure on common issues. The so-called
Tako imenovana „namenitev sredstev“ zahteva od držav članic, da se osredotočajo na financiranje kategorij iz prenovljene („lizbonske“) strategije za rast in delovna mesta.
“earmarking” exercise asks Member States to focus the funding on categories stemming from the renewed Growth and Jobs (Lisbon) Strategy.
Te kategorije zadevajo prednostne teme, kot so raziskave in tehnološki razvoj, inovacije in podjetništvo, informacijska družba, promet (za konvergenčne regije), energetika, vključno z obnovljivimi energetskimi viri, varstvo okolja in človeški viri ter zadeve, povezane s politiko trga dela.
These categories concern priority themes such as research and technological development, innovation and entrepreneurship, the information society, transport (for Convergence regions), energy, including renewable energy sources, environmental protection and human resources and labour market policy related issues.
Raven izdatkov za ta namen je 60 % za konvergenčne regije in 75 % za regije iz cilja regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja. Določbe se uporabljajo samo za EU-15, za nove države članice ne veljajo.
COHESION POLICY 20072013: INDICATIVE FINANCIAL ALLOCATIONS MILLION EUR, 2004 PRICES
KOHEZIJSKA POLITIKA 20072013: OKVIRNA DODELITEV SREDSTEV MILIJONI EUR, CENE 2004
REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS AND EMPLOYMENT OBJECTIVE
CILJA REGIONALNA KONKURENČNOST IN ZAPOSLOVANJE
EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL COOPERATION OBJECTIVE
CILJ EVROPSKO OZEMELJSKO SODELOVANJE
Cohesion Fund
Postopno uvajanje
Phasing in
Kohezijski sklad
Regional competitiveness and employment
Statistično postopno opuščanje
Statistical Phasing out
Regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje
for Reconstruction and Development in order to pool expertise and to assist Member States and regions in the preparation of major projects;
EU-25: Regije ciljev konvergenca ter regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje 2007-2013
The level of expenditure to be earmarked for these is 60% for Convergence regions and 75% for regions under the Regional Competitiveness and Employment objective.
Regije cilja konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje
The provisions only apply to the EU-15 and not to the new Member States.
Na podlagi podatkov Eurostata za BDP/prebivalca, ki so bili na razpolago aprila 2005, in na sporazumu o finančnih perspektivah decembra 2005
New regional policy instruments and financial engineering together with the EIB and the European Investment Fund, in order to increase access to finance for the development of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises in the regions of the EU;
Novi instrumenti regionalne politike in finančno inženirstvo srednja podjetja) je pobuda Evropske komisije ter EIB in Evropskega investicijskega sklada, namenjena večjemu dostopu do financ za razvoj mikro, malih in srednjih podjetij v regijah EU;
Three new regional policy instruments for 2007-2013 will help Member States and regions to establish sound and efficient management of the funds and to make better use of financial engineering instruments.
Trije novi instrumenti regionalne politike za obdobje 2007–2013 bodo državam članicam in regijam pomagali vzpostaviti dobro in učinkovito upravljanje skladov ter omogočili boljšo uporabo instrumentov finančnega inženirstva.
A closer cooperation between the European Commission, the European Investment Bank (EIB) and other financial institutions will strengthen capacitybuilding at the level of national and regional institutions.
Tesnejše sodelovanje med Evropsko komisijo, Evropsko investicijsko banko (EIB) ter drugimi finančnimi institucijami bo okrepilo zmogljivosti na ravni nacionalnih in regionalnih institucij.
JESSICA (Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas) is an initiative of the European Commission in cooperation with the EIB and the Council of Europe Development Bank to promote sustainable investment in urban areas.
ment in City Areas – Skupna evropska podpora za trajnostne naložbe v mestna območja) je pobuda Evropske komisije v sodelovanju z EIB in Razvojno banko Sveta Evrope za spodbujanje trajnostnih naložb v mestna območja.
JASPERS (Joint Assistance in Supporting Projects in European Regions) seeks to develop cooperation between the European Commission, the EIB and the European Bank
JASPERS (Joint Assistance in Supporting Projects in European Regions – Skupna pomoč pri podpori projektov v evropskih regijah) je namenjen razvoju sodelovanja med Evropsko komisijo, EIB in Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj z združevanjem strokovnega znanja ter pomoči državam članicam in regijam pri pripravi glavnih projektov;
More information: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy n u l l
Več informacij na spletni strani: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy
Bridge on new Bilbao to Santander motorway, near Las Arenas, Basque Country (Spain) on the same basis.
Most na novi avtocesti Bilbao - Santander blizu Las Arenasa, Baskija (Španija)
4) Who benefits?
4) Kdo je deležen koristi?
The new strategic guidelines are important because they focus even more on growth and jobs.
v prihodnosti poudarek na znanju in informacijski družbi, podjetništvu, okolju in zaposlovanju.
3) What makes Cohesion Policy special?
3) Zakaj je kohezijska politika drugačna?
The unique modalities and method of EU’s Cohesion Policy have helped it work better and more efficiently than any other such policy elsewhere in the world.
Edinstveni načini delovanja in metoda kohezijske politike EU so pripomogli, da deluje bolje in učinkoviteje kot katera koli druga takšna politika na svetu.
It has helped the poorer regions of Europe catch up significantly and it has encouraged large-scale job creation in areas of high unemployment.
Z njeno pomočjo so revnejše regije v Evropi bistveno napredovale, prav tako pa je spodbudila obsežno ustvarjanje delovnih mest na območjih visoke brezposelnosti.
That is because it has resources which are uniquely stable (over seven years) and foster long-term planning and development.
To je mogoče zaradi njenih virov, ki so edinstveno stabilni (za obdobje 7 let) in spodbujajo dolgoročno načrtovanje in razvoj.
And it is because we have developed a special method of working which is the envy of many countries.
K uspehu pripomore tudi posebna metoda dela, ki smo jo razvili in nam jo zavidajo številne države.
The Union has given Cohesion Policy a clear focus on the poorest regions and countries.
Unija je oblikovala kohezijsko politiko tako, da se jasno osredotoča na najrevnejše regije in države.
Over 80% of the cash will go to what we call “Convergence” regions, basically those which have less than 75% of Europe’s average income (measured as Gross Domestic Product per head).
Več kot 80 % denarja bo namenjenega t.i. „konvergenčnim“ regijam, predvsem tistim, kjer dohodek znaša manj kot 75 % evropskega povprečja (določeno kot bruto domači proizvod na osebo).
About half the population of Europe will be covered, and most of the new Member States.
Zajetega bo približno polovica evropskega prebivalstva in večina novih držav članic.
15.7% of the money will be set aside for ‘Regional Competitiveness’in the whole of the rest of Europe, that is, anywhere which is not a “Convergence” region.
15,7 % denarja bo prihranjenega za „regionalno konkurenčnost“ po vsej ostali Evropi, se pravi tam, kjer ni „konvergenčnih“ regij.
This money will be used for Growth and Jobs projects to face up modernisation processes in all other regions.
Ta denar bo porabljen za projekte za rast in delovna mesta, ki bodo zagotovili usklajenost s postopki posodabljanja v vseh drugih regijah.
The rest is for “Territorial Co-operation”between border regions in Europe, and for networking activities.
Ostanek je namenjen „ozemeljskemu sodelovanju“ med obmejnimi regijami v Evropi in za dejavnosti mrežnega povezovanja.
This special method gives the regions responsibility for project selection and management.
Zaradi notranjega trga EU imajo ljudje in gospodarske družbe iz vseh regij dostop do poslovnih možnosti, ustvarjenih prek kohezijske politike, in se lahko zanje potegujejo.
It brings together in an efficient partnership national, regional and local authorities, enterprises
Enako pomembno je, da se izbor opravi lokalno in je odvisen od usklajenosti predlaganih projektov s splošnimi merili in programi, ki so bili izbrani za zadevno regijo.
So the money is available to a wide range of people across Europe.
S to posebno metodo so regije odgovorne za izbor projektov in upravljanje.
Thanks to the EU’s internal market, people and companies from all regions can have access to and bid for
Nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne organe oblasti, podjetja ter nevladne organizacije poveže v učinkovito partnerstvo.
5) Is there enough money to make a real difference?
5) Je denarja dovolj za dejanski napredek?
7) How do these activities relate to everyday life?
7) Kako so te dejavnosti povezane z vsakdanjim življenjem?
Cohesion Policy projects relate to the citizen in two very important ways: First, through the participation of all active citizens – the so-called civil society – at the stage of preparation, programming and implementation of a project, and second through the actual benefits an efficiently planned and implemented project brings to the local community.
Projekti kohezijske politike so z državljani povezani na dva zelo pomembna načina. Najprej prek sodelovanja vseh aktivnih državljanov – t.i. civilne družbe – na stopnji priprav, načrtovanja in izvajanja projekta in nato prek dejanskih koristi, ki jih ima lokalna skupnost od dobro načrtovanega in izvedenega projekta.
In many ways, the results of Cohesion Policy are just around the corner for most European citizens.
Pogosto so rezultati kohezijske politike za večino evropskih državljanov takoj za ovinkom.
Year by year, several thousands of projects in all Member States receive funding through the European Cohesion Policy and contribute to the catching-up of poor regions, to increased regional competitiveness and the creation of jobs.
Prek evropske kohezijske politike se vsako leto financira več tisoč projektov v vseh državah članicah, kar omogoča napredek revnih regij, večjo regionalno konkurenčnost in ustvarjanje delovnih mest.
The selection of these projects is based on the analysis of the needs and development perspectives of regional economies, and it is carried out by regional and national authorities in the framework of an EU-wide strategic approach.
Izbor teh projektov temelji na analizi potreb in razvojnih možnosti regionalnih gospodarstev, izvedejo pa ga regionalni in nacionalni organi oblasti v okviru splošnega strateškega pristopa EU.
The outcome of the funds’ interventions is measured by both Member States and the European Commission.
Rezultate pomoči iz skladov ocenjujejo tako države članice kot Evropska komisija.
Evaluations show that between 1988 and 2001 the gap between the poorest regions and the EU average was reduced by one-sixth.
Ocene kažejo, da se je v obdobju od leta 1988 do 2001 razlika med najrevnejšimi regijami in povprečjem EU znižala za eno šestino.
For example, the increase in the level of GDP due to Cohesion Policy was 10% in Greece and 8.5% in Portugal between 1989 and 1999. The projected increase for both countries in the current period 2000-2006 is about 6%.
Na primer raven BDP se je v obdobju med letom 1989 in 1999 zaradi kohezijske politike zvišala za 10 % v Grčiji in za 8,5 % na Portugalskem, načrtovano povečanje za obe državi v trenutnem obdobju od leta 2000 do 2006 pa znaša približno 6 %.
Concerning the 2007-2013 period, recent research suggests that additional GDP growth in the new Member States will be in the order of about 7-12% and that 2.5 million new jobs could be created.
Nedavne raziskave za obdobje od leta 2007 do 2013 kažejo, da bo dodatna rast BDP v novih državah članicah dosegla približno od 7 do 12 % in da bi bilo lahko ustvarjenih 2,5 milijona novih delovnih mest.
The Commission has always taken the view that this policy only works properly if it takes account of local experience, if problems are identified at the regional level, and if solutions are designed and carried out by the communities which will gain the ultimate benefit.
Komisija je bila vedno menja, da ta politika ustrezno deluje le, če se upoštevajo lokalne izkušnje, če se problemi določijo na lokalni ravni ter rešitve oblikujejo in izvedejo skupnosti, ki imajo končno korist.
Making such diverse groups work successfully together is not straightforward and some, especially the new, Member States are nervous of taking the plunge.
Uspešno sodelovanje tako različnih skupin ni samoumevno in nekatere države članice, zlasti nove, se stežka odločijo za odločilen korak.
But the benefits go further than an improvement in local democracy and the involvement of civil society.
Poleg izboljšanja lokalne demokracije in vključenosti civilne družbe obstajajo še druge koristi.
They include a higher level of locally relevant project proposals and a big improvement in local communication and publicity about the projects which are funded.
Le-te vključujejo več predlogov za projekte, ki ustrezajo lokalnim razmeram, in veliko izboljšanje lokalnega obveščanja o fi -nanciranih projektih in reklame zanje.
You do not need to look at the work which has been done for long to realise that a lot of projects have been successfully completed and that they have indeed made a big difference.
Za ugotovitev, da je bilo veliko projektov uspešno zaključenih in da so dejansko pripomogli k napredku, ni potrebno dolgotrajno proučevanje opravljenega dela.
Look at the transport system in Spain which has been utterly transformed over 20 years with motorways opening up the regions, high-speed trains, trams and metros in the cities.
Oglejte si prometni sistem v Španiji, ki se je v 20 letih popolnoma spremenil z novimi avtocestami v regijah, hitrimi vlaki, tramvaji in podzemnimi železnicami v mestih.
Look at Athens where a Community-funded suburban railway has made the brand new airport accessible and where trams, extended metros and a ring road have helped make the city’s sky bluer by reducing pollution.
Poglejte Atene, kjer je popolnoma novo letališče dostopno zaradi podzemne železnice, ki jo je financirala Skupnost, in kjer se je zaradi tramvajev, razširjene podzemne železnice in obvoznice zmanjšalo onesnaževanje in je postalo nebo nad mestom bolj modro.
Look at the new water distribution and treatment systems which are going into Polish, Lithuanian and Estonian cities.
Poglejte nove sisteme za distribucijo in obdelavo vode, ki se gradijo v poljskih, litovskih in estonskih mestih.
Look at the business and high-tech clusters which have been encouraged in Sweden, Finland, Germany, France and Ireland.
Poglejte podjetniške skupine in skupine, usmerjene v visoko tehnologijo, ki se jih je spodbujalo na Švedskem, Finskem, v Nemčiji, Franciji in na Irskem.
6) How is spending controlled?
6) Kako se poraba nadzira?
How great is the danger of mismanagement?
Kakšna je nevarnost slabega upravljanja sredstev?
In fact, the Member States are responsible for most management and control and the Commission requires the very best systems and personnel to carry out this function.
Države članice so odgovorne za večino upravljanja in nadzora, Komisija pa zahteva najboljše sisteme in osebje za izvajanje te naloge.
There have been isolated problems but few given the
Pojavilo se je nekaj posameznih problemov, vendar malo glede na količino denarja, s katero se upravlja.
The Commission is considering ways to encourage new ideas and stimulate innovative actions and more co-operation to help regions tackle their problems.
Pridobljene izkušnje bi se izmenjavale in bi prispevale k napredku nacionalnih reformnih programov, s katerimi dajejo države članice več zagona lizbonskemu procesu.
One way forward would be to build on our existing exchange of experience activities by bringing together groups of like-minded regions at an
Združene skupine regij bi se lahko osredotočile na vprašanja, kot so energetska učinkovitost ali kako naj raziskave koristijo malim in srednjim podjetjem.
early stage in the development of their programmes to focus on particular issues and make progress by pooling all the relevant ideas.
9) Kako globalizacija in selitev proizvodnje vplivata na kohezijsko politiko?
At the same time, we have developed a fund of knowledge which we can use to help regions which are affected by adverse economic changes and which has proved its worth over and over again.
Hkrati smo razvili že večkrat preizkušen sklad znanja, ki ga lahko uporabljamo kot pomoč regijam, prizadetim zaradi neugodnih gospodarskih sprememb.
10) How is transparency ensured?
10) Kako zagotoviti transparentnost?
The experience subsequently gained could be shared and be a contribution to progress on the National Reform Programmes by which the Member States are giving more impetus to the Lisbon process.
Odločitve, ki so bile sprejete zunaj skupnosti ali regij ali zunaj Evrope, lahko uničujoče vplivajo na te skupnosti ali regije. Sama kohezijska politika je nastala kot odgovor na možne stranske učinke, ki bi jih na začetku povzročilo evropsko povezovanje in kasneje globalizacija v povezavi s svetovnim odprtim tržnim gospodarstvom.
The groupings of regions could focus on issues like energy efficiency or bringing the benefits of research to SMEs.
Vendar kohezijska politika sama ne more preprečiti odločitev, ki se sprejmejo na svetovnem prizorišču in temeljijo na čisto ekonomski podlagi.
But there would be no restrictions on what these regional groupings could select as a focal point.
Lahko pa omogoči regijam, da postanejo privlačnejše za zunanje vlagatelje. Dejansko je to prvi element strateških
9) How is Cohesion Policy affected by globalisation and delocalisation?
Na tem področju so najpomembnejši akterji same države članice.
The effects on communities and regions of decisions taken outside them, or outside Europe, can be devastating.
Le-te so prve odgovorne za obveščanje svojih državljanov o dejavnostih, ki so sofinancirane iz strukturnih skladov Skupnosti.
Cohesion Policy itself has been the EU’s response to possible side effects brought about initially by European integration and later by globalisation in terms of a worldwide free market economy.
Kohezijska politika je ena od redkih politik EU, ki državam članicam nalaga obveznost reklame in obveščanja javnosti. Komisija hkrati tudi poveže uradnike, ki imajo v državah članicah nalogo obveščanja javnosti, tako da si lahko izmenjavajo ideje o vrstah obveščanja, ki dejansko delujejo.
As a policy of proven and tangible solidarity among Member States, Cohesion Policy has
Ta delovna skupina, imenovana „Skupina za obveščanje o strukturnih skladih“, je ena od najbolj dinamičnih in produktivnih skupin, s katerimi sodelujemo.
They are the ones which have primary responsibility for informing their citizens about the activities which are co-financed with Community Structural Funds.
Urednik: Thierry DAMAN, Evropska komisija, GD za regionalno politiko, Enota 01, faks (32-2) 29-66003.
Cohesion Policy is one of the few EU policies which impose a publicity and information obligation on Member States.
Besedila te objave za Komisijo niso zavezujoča.
At the same time, the Commission brings together the officials who do the information job in the Member States so they can exchange ideas on the kind of publicity which really works. This working group, the‘Structural Funds Information Team’is one of the most dynamic and productive that we work with.
Elektronski naslov GD za regionalno politiko: http://ec.europa.eu/regional _ poli c y / in de x _ e n . h t m Naročila: regio-info@ec.europa.eu Osnovni podatki so objavljeni v vseh uradnih jezikih Evropske unije.Tiskano na recikliranem papirju
Cohesion Policy and cities
Kohezijska politika in mesta
The urban contribution to growth and jobs in the regions
Prispevek mest in naselij k rasti in zaposlovanju v regijah
Communication from the Commissionto the Council and Parliament
Sporočilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu Parlamentu
SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN EUROPEAN REGIONAL POLICY 2007 2013
TRAJNOSTNI RAZVOJ MEST V REGIONALNI EVROPSKI POLITIKI OD LETA 2007 DO 2013:
URBAN REALITIES: WHY CITIES MATTER
MESTNA STVARNOST: ZAKAJ SO MESTA POMEMBNA
ATTRACTIVE CITIES 3.1.
PRIVLAČNA MESTA 3.1. Dostopnost in mobilnost
Access to service facilities 3.3.
Dostop do infrastrukture storitev 3.3.
Natural and physical environment 3.4.
Naravno in fizično okolje 3.4. Kultura
SUPPORTING INNOVATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY
PODPORA INOVACIJI, PODJETNIŠKI MISELNOSTI IN EKONOMIJI ZNANJA
The Paradox of Cities: many jobs, yet high unemployment 5.2.
Mestni paradoks: veliko delovnih mest in hkrati visoka
Improving employability by raising levels of educational achievement and training
10 brezposelnost 5.2. Izboljšanje zaposljivosti z zvišanjem ravni izobraževanja in usposabljanja
Cohesion Policy and cities The urban contribution to growth and jobs in the regions
Kohezijska politika in mesta Prispevek mest in naselij k rasti in zaposlovanju v regijah
GOVERNANCE 7.1.
UPRAVLJANJE 7.1.
Cities and regions
Mesta in regije
Citizen participation 7.4.
Sodelovanje državljanov 7.4.
Networks and exchange of experience
Povezovanje in izmenjava izkušenj
SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN EUROPEAN REGIONAL POLICY 2007 2013
TRAJNOSTNI RAZVOJ MEST V REGIONALNI EVROPSKI POLITIKI OD LETA 2007 DO 2013