natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‘INVOLVE’ was a participatory research project funded by INTI about how to facilitate volunteering in the two-way process of integration.
Obravnaval je spodbujanje prostovoljstva v dvosmernem procesu integracije.
Sixteen concrete recommendations were formulated for policy-makers at different levels of governance, and practitioners in mainstream and migrant organisations.
Izoblikovanih je bilo šestnajst konkretnih priporočil za oblikovalce politik na različnih upravnih stopnjah in za strokovne delavce iz uveljavljenih organizacij in priseljenskih organizacij.
The 2005 publication by the UK Department for Communities and Local Government, Ethnicity Monitoring Guidance : Involvement, aims to promote the involvement of Black and minority ethnic communities in Neighbourhood Renewal activities by encouraging local partnerships with community associations.
Namen publikacije Ethnicity Monitoring Guidance: Involvement, ki jo je leta 2005 izdalo Ministrstvo za skupnosti in lokalno samoupravo Združenega kraljestva, je spodbujanje vključevanja skupnosti črnske manjšine in etničnih manjšin v okviru aktivnosti prenove soseščin na podlagi krepitve lokalnih partnerstev z združenji v skupnosti.
The Pangea Development Partnership in the Spanish region of Castilla – La Mancha is composed of migrant associations, NGOs and local and regional public authorities.
Razvojno partnerstvo Pangea v španski regiji Kastilja-La Mancha obsega združenja priseljencev, nevladne organizacije ter lokalne in regionalne organe javne uprave.
“Intercultural links”, or mediators, have been able to reach over half of all immigrants living in this rural area.
„Medkulturnim povezavam“ oziroma mediatorjem je uspelo vzpostaviti stik z več kot polovico vseh priseljencev, ki živijo na tem podeželskem območju.
They linked them with integrated and specialised training and advice services and ongoing workplace support programmes.
Na voljo so jim integrirano in specializirano usposabljanje, svetovalne službe in stalni programi podpore na delovnem mestu.
Awarenessraising measures are coupled with “Inter-cultural barometer” research on topics like the socioeconomic and cultural contribution of the immigrant population in a given municipality.
Ukrepi za ozaveščanje so povezani z raziskavami „medkulturnega barometra“ o temah, kot so socialno-ekonomski in kulturni prispevek populacije priseljencev v določeni občini.
Awarenessraising campaigns and events allow all citizens to learn facts on migration and integration and find out how they can participate in the integration process.
Kampanje in dogodki za ozaveščanje vsem državljanom omogočijo, da spoznajo dejstva o migraciji in integraciji ter ugotovijo, kako lahko sodelujejo v integracijskem procesu.
They also create spaces for the frequent interaction of migrants and national citizens, which develop the intercultural competencies of all.
Prav tako ustvarjajo prostor za interakcijo med priseljenci in državljani države, kar prispeva k razvoju medkulturnih kompetenc vseh udeležencev.
An evidence-based approach to awarenessraising starts with a dedicated mapping phase, where surveys and polls provide a solid baseline of migrant and general public perceptions that can be regularly evaluated.
Na dejstvih temelječ pristop k ozaveščanju se začne z ugotavljanjem stanja, medtem ko raziskave in ankete zagotavljajo trdno podlago za redno ovrednotenje dojemanja priseljencev in širše javnosti.
Analysis of survey results bring to light the factors behind perceptions which help in setting the appropriate target group.
Analiza rezultatov raziskav izpostavi dejavnike, ki vplivajo na dojemanje, in tako pomaga opredeliti ustrezno ciljno skupino.
These results can also be used to draw media and public attention to the launch of an awarenessraising campaign.
Ti rezultati se lahko uporabijo tudi za pritegnitev pozornosti medijev in javnosti na začetku kampanje za ozaveščanje.
Because government policies and messages have a significant impact on the credibility and effectiveness of a campaign, policy- and opinion-makers may be some of its key target groups.
Ker vladne politike in sporočila pomembno vplivajo na verodostojnost in učinkovitost posamezne kampanje, so lahko med ključnimi ciljnimi skupinami tudi oblikovalci politik in mnenj.
Setting the appropriate target group (i.e. changing the opinion of the general public, of immigrants, or of selected stakeholders or groups within the population) sets a clear definition of success for the campaign.
Določitev ustrezne ciljne skupine (npr. spreminjanje stališč v širši javnosti, pri priseljencih, izbranih interesnih skupinah ali drugih skupinah prebivalcev) jasno opredeli cilje uspešne kampanje.
‘Myth-busting’ initiatives improve public opinion by providing a true-to-life picture of immigration based on facts and personal accounts.
Pobude za „razbijanje mitov“ izboljšajo javno mnenje s tem, da dajejo realno sliko priseljevanja, ki temelji na dejstvih in osebnih pričevanjih.
It sensitises society to the special attributes and needs of different migrant groups, especially the most vulnerable and stereotyped, such as the undocumented, asylum seekers, and immigrant women.
Tako postane družba bolj dojemljiva za posebne značilnosti in potrebe različnih priseljenskih skupin, zlasti tistih, ki so najranljivejše in najbolj stereotipizirane, na primer osebe brez urejenega statusa, prosilci za azil in priseljenke.
Public celebrations and cultural events make immigrants’ contributions and the benefits of diversity more visible to the general public, while providing a marketplace for organisations working on integration to recruit volunteers.
Javne prireditve in kulturni dogodki pripomorejo k večji prepoznavnosti prispevkov priseljencev in koristi, ki jih širši javnosti prinaša raznolikost, hkrati pa organizacijam, ki se ukvarjajo z integracijo, ponujajo priložnost za pridobivanje prostovoljcev.
A public empowerment approach to awarenessraising means that provision of information is directly linked to spaces for meaningful and sustained interaction between individual immigrants and members of the public.
Pristop k ozaveščanju, ki temelji na krepitvi vloge in položaja javnosti, pomeni, da je zagotavljanje informacij neposredno povezano s prostorom za plodno in trajno interakcijo med posameznimi priseljenci in javnostjo.
The “Nothing about us without us” principle is critical to the success of any empowerment measure.
Načelo „nič o nas brez nas“ je bistveno za uspeh vsakega ukrepa za krepitev vloge in položaja priseljencev.
It requires that the end-users serve as the principal actors in the planning, implementation, and monitoring phases.
To načelo narekuje, da so končni uporabniki glavni akterji v fazah načrtovanja, izvajanja in spremljanja.
A needs assessment and analysis, conducted by the direct beneficiaries, gives the framework to evaluate their personal or community/organisational situation themselves.
Ocena in analiza potreb, ki ju opravijo neposredni upravičenci, ustvarja okvir za oceno njihovega osebnega položaja ali položaja v skupnosti/organizaciji.
Measures that are flexible and tailor-made for beneficiaries’ specific stated needs meet participants’ expectations and empowerment’s ultimate aim of improving their situation.
Ukrepi, ki so prožni in prilagojeni posebnim potrebam, kakor so jih izrazili upravičenci, izpolnjujejo pričakovanja udeležencev in končni cilj krepitve vloge in položaja, ki je izboljšanje njihovih razmer.
What distinguishes an empowerment measure from many educational programmes introduced in the area of immigrant integration is the combination of education and action, giving target group the unique opportunity to act upon their acquired knowledge.
Ukrepi za krepitev vloge in položaja priseljencev se razlikujejo od številnih izobraževalnih programov, ki potekajo na področju integracije priseljencev, po tem, da kombinirajo izobraževanje in ukrepanje, ki ciljni skupini daje enkratno priložnost, da izkoristi svoje pridobljeno znanje.
Mainstream organisations are also empowered by the immigrant empowerment measures that they adopt.
Uveljavljene organizacije se prav tako krepijo na podlagi ukrepov, ki jih sprejmejo za krepitev vloge in položaja priseljencev.
Their enhanced capacities, resources, and intercultural competencies improve the quality and inclusiveness of their decision-making and service-delivery.
Njihove povečane sposobnosti, sredstva in medkulturne kompetence izboljšajo kakovost in odprtost njihovega odločanja in zagotavljanja storitev.
Chapter 4 Dialogue Platforms
Poglavje 4 Platforme za dialog
Dialogue is used across cultural traditions to promote mutual understanding and trust and to prevent and solve conflicts.
Dialog se v vseh kulturnih tradicijah uporablja za spodbujanje medsebojnega razumevanja in zaupanja ter za preprečevanje in reševanje konfliktov.
Ad hoc and ongoing dialogue platforms can be used to negotiate integration by remedying a lack of mutual understanding and trust that may exist among and between migrants, residents, citizens of immigrant and non-immigrant background, and between these diverse groups and the government at all levels.
Namen začasnih in stalnih platform je lahko vodenje pogajanj o integraciji zato, da se izboljša medsebojno razumevanje in zaupanje med priseljenci, prebivalci, državljani s priseljenskim ozadjem in brez njega ter med temi raznolikimi skupinami in vlado na vseh ravneh.
A successful platform generates an open and respectful exchange of views and, when done well, helps participants to find common ground for cooperation.
Uspešna platforma omogoča odprto in spoštljivo izmenjavo stališč in, če je dobro zasnovana, pomaga udeležencem, da opredelijo skupne točke sodelovanja.
It is a place to negotiate on conflicting interests and for finding common solutions.
Je prostor za pogajanja o nasprotujočih si interesih in iskanje skupnih rešitev.
Follow-up activities then pick up where the dialogue platform leaves off, which can have the effect of strengthening social and associational networks in the community and a shared sense of identity in a diverse society.
Nadaljnje aktivnosti, ki se začnejo tam, kjer se je platforma za dialog končala, lahko krepijo socialne mreže in mreže združenj v skupnosti in skupni občutek pripadnosti raznoliki družbi.
This chapter develops on the first Common Basic Principle, which defines integration as a two-way process of mutual accommodation by all immigrants and residents of Member States.
To poglavje temelji na prvem skupnem osnovnem načelu, ki integracijo opredeljuje kot dvosmerni proces vzajemnega prilagajanja priseljencev in državljanov držav članic.
Governments are encouraged to involve both in integration policy and communicate clearly their mutual rights and responsibilities.
Vlade je treba spodbujati, da obe skupini vključijo v integracijsko politiko in jih jasno obvestijo o njihovih vzajemnih pravicah in obveznostih.
One fundamental mechanism, according to the seventh Common Basic Principle, is the frequent and meaningful interaction at local level between local residents, with and without immigrant backgrounds.
Eden od temeljnih mehanizmov po sedmem skupnem osnovnem načelu je redna in plodna interakcija na lokalni ravni med lokalnimi prebivalci s priseljenskim ozadjem in brez njega.
The chapter outlines each step in the process of setting up and running a dialogue platform and the practical obstacles that often need to be overcome.
To poglavje obravnava vsak korak v procesu vzpostavitve in vodenja platforme za dialog ter praktične ovire, ki jih je pogosto treba preseči.
It first addresses what the suitable legal framework is, whose issues and needs are the focus of a platform, who participates, what baseline skills are required, what are the rules of the game.
Najprej opisuje ustrezen pravni okvir, čigava vprašanja in potrebe so v središču platforme, kdo so njeni udeleženci, katere osnovne spretnosti so potrebne in kakšna so pravila igre.
It explores how mutual understanding and trust in dialogue can translate into greater cooperation in a community.
Razišče tudi, kako medsebojno razumevanje in zaupanje v dialog lahko prispevata k boljšemu sodelovanju v skupnosti.
A leading public authority or civil society actor can facilitate a dialogue platform, taking on various roles to give platforms more efficient working methods, more effective follow-up and greater community impact.
Vodilni organ javne uprave ali akter civilne družbe lahko spodbuja platformo za dialog s tem, da prevzame različne naloge za izboljšanje delovnih metod platform, učinkovitejše spremljanje in doseganje večjega vpliva v skupnosti.
This chapter explains what roles a convening public authority or civil society actor can play in each phase of the dialogue platform.
To poglavje pojasnjuje, katere naloge v posameznih fazah platforme za dialog lahko opravlja organ javne uprave ali akter civilne družbe, ki je pobudnik take platforme.
These lessons learned can serve as inspiration for platforms at neighbourhood, municipal, regional, and national level—even at European level, where the European Integration Forum was launched in April 2009.
Ta pridobljena nova spoznanja so lahko navdih za platforme na ravni soseščin, občin, regij in držav, celo na evropski ravni, na kateri je bil aprila 2009 vzpostavljen evropski forum o integraciji.
International migration has enhanced Europe’s existing ethnic, cultural, religious, and linguistic diversity and will continue to do so.
Mednarodne migracije so povečale in bodo še naprej povečevale obstoječo etnično, kulturno, versko in jezikovno raznolikost Evrope.
The majority of EU citizens reported having recent and positive contact with people of different ethnicities, religions and nationalities, according to the 2007 Flash Eurobarometer 217.
Večina državljanov EU je po rezultatih Flash Eurobarometra 217 iz leta 2007 poročala o nedavnih pozitivnih stikih z osebami različne etnične, verske in nacionalne pripadnosti.
Although those surveyed found it hard to define what “intercultural dialogue” was, they associated many positive meanings with it from communication among different communities to transnational mobility, access to culture, and linguistic diversity.
Čeprav so anketiranci le s težavo opredelili pojem medkulturnega dialoga, so z njim povezali veliko pozitivnih pojmov, na primer, komunikacijo med različnimi skupnostmi, transnacionalno mobilnost, dostop do kulture in jezikovno raznolikost.
In the long-term, Europe can see the full benefit of this diversity for its economic growth, competitiveness, creativity, and position in the world.
Dolgoročno bo lahko Evropa celoti izkoristila to raznolikost za svojo gospodarsko rast, konkurenčnost, ustvarjalnost in vlogo v svetu.
The way in which a place—from a nation to a neighbourhood—adapts to this diversity in the short and medium term may cause rises and falls in the overall levels of mutual trust and understanding in society.
prilagajanja določenega kraja tej raznolikosti – od države do soseščine – lahko povzroči dvige in padce v stopnji medsebojnega zaupanja in razumevanja v družbi.
For example, recent research has put forward the suggestion that high levels of diversity (i.e. different kinds of people living together in a community) may trigger “self-isolation” and “social distance” among people.
Nedavna raziskava je na primer izpostavila domnevo, da lahko visoka stopnja raznolikosti (npr. različne osebe, živeče skupaj v določeni skupnosti) sproži „samoosamitev“ in „socialno distanco“ med ljudmi.
Compared to the average person, people living in very heterogeneous neighbourhoods tend to :
V primerjavi s povprečno osebo pa osebe, ki živijo v zelo heterogenih soseščinah, večinoma:
•Know and trust their neighbours less, whether or not their knowledge comes from the same or another background
•slabše poznajo svoje sosede in so do njih bolj nezaupljive, ne glede na to, ali njihovo znanje izhaja iz enakega ali drugačnega ozadja;
•Have less trust (though not necessarily less knowledge) of local politics, leaders and media
•manj zaupajo lokalni politiki, voditeljem in medijem (čeprav ni nujno, da jih slabše poznajo);
•Participate politically in different ways like street protests and social reform groups
•politično sodelujejo na drugačne načine, na primer pri uličnih protestih in v skupinah za socialno reformo;
•Have a worse sense of well-being
•imajo slabši občutek za blaginjo;
•Expect that they have less influence over political decisions and that their communities are less likely to cooperate together to solve a common problem
•menijo, da je njihov vpliv na politične odločitve manjši in da njihove skupnosti verjetno ne bodo vključene v reševanje skupnih težav.
These findings caution that communities in transition, left on their own, may temporarily experience lower levels of mutual understanding and trust within majority and within minority groups, between majorities and minorities, and with their local government.
Te ugotovitve opozarjajo, da lahko skupnosti na prehodu, če jih prepustimo same sebi, začasno izkusijo nižjo stopnjo medsebojnega razumevanja in zaupanja med skupinami večinskega in manjšinskega prebivalstva, med večinskim prebivalstvom in manjšinami, kot tudi v svoji lokalni upravi.
Lower levels of mutual understanding and trust are often attributed to lower levels of social capital (that is, fewer social and organisational networks).
Nižja stopnja medsebojnega razumevanja in zaupanja se pogosto pripisuje nižjim stopnjam socialnega kapitala (torej manjšemu številu socialnih in organizacijskih mrež).
Friendships and civil society provide individuals with local opportunities for meaningful interaction and relationships.
Posamezniki lahko v okviru prijateljstev in civilne družbe izkoristijo lokalne priložnosti za plodne interakcijo in odnose.
The strength of social and associational networks influences the level of trust and solidarity within the community and the personal and economic well-being of its residents.
Moč socialnih mrež in mrež združenj vpliva na stopnjo zaupanja in solidarnosti v skupnosti ter na osebno in gospodarsko blaginjo njenih prebivalcev.
Increasing diversity is only one factor in what is a general decline in social capital in many Western societies, where people are not as socially and civically active as they used to be.
Povečanje raznolikosti je samo eden od dejavnikov, ki vpliva na splošno nazadovanje socialnega kapitala v številnih zahodnih družbah, kjer ljudje niso več tako družbeno in državljansko aktivni, kakor so bili včasih.
Societal integration is negatively affected by weakening social and associational networks which can lead to extreme individualism and indifference to others’ well-being, mutual stereotyping and scapegoating, the voicelessness of vulnerable groups, inaction on real community problems, conflicts over the distribution of resources, and multiple forms of discrimination and extremism on all sides of the spectrum.
Na družbeno vključenost negativno vpliva slabitev socialnih mrež in mrež združenj, kar lahko povzroči skrajni individualizem in brezbrižnost za blaginjo drugih, medsebojno stereotipiziranje in iskanje grešnih kozlov, neslišnost ranljivih skupin, neukrepanje v zvezi z resničnimi težavami skupnosti, konflikte pri razporejanju sredstev in večkratne oblike diskriminacije in ekstremizma vseh vpletenih strani.
This weakening also has an impact on the integration of newcomers, who are hit the hardest.
To slabljenje vpliva tudi na integracijo novih priseljencev, ki so najbolj prizadeti.
During the settlement process, newcomers tend to rely on the existing social and associational networks, more than natives or established groups, in order to make up for their lack of social capital in the country.
Med procesom nastanitve se novi priseljenci prej obrnejo na obstoječe socialne mreže in mreže združenj kot na domačine ali uveljavljene skupine, da tako nadoknadijo pomanjkanje svojega socialnega kapitala v tej državi.
4.1 Setting up and running a platform : overcoming obstacles
4.1 Vzpostavitev in vodenje platforme: preseganje ovir
Policy-makers often turn to dialogue to reassure the population in response to big news items about social conflict.
Oblikovalci politik se pogosto zatečejo k dialogu, da ublažijo odziv prebivalstva na pomembne novice o socialnih konfliktih.
These conflicts may be symptomatic of greater problems of inequality and disadvantage in a diverse society (i.e. labour market exclusion, deprived urban areas, racism).
Ti konflikti so lahko znak večjih težav v zvezi z neenakostjo in slabim položajem v raznoliki družbi (npr. izključenost s trga dela, prikrajšana mestna območja, rasizem).
As such, these tensions will eventually require negotiating a proper integration policy response to address the specific problem.
Te napetosti bodo postopoma zahtevale dogovor o ustreznem odzivu na ravni integracijske politike za obravnavo specifičnih težav.
A dialogue platform can be thought of as a starting point for negotiating this proper policy response.
Platforma za dialog je lahko točka za začetek razprav o ustreznem odzivu politike.
It can be a point of first contact for overcoming misunderstanding and mistrust.
Postane lahko točka prvega stika za preseganje nerazumevanja in nezaupanja.
It initiates conversation on a specific problem by providing a civic space for an open and respectful exchange of views.
Z zagotavljanjem družbenega prostora za odprto in spoštljivo izmenjavo stališč omogoča začetek pogovora o specifični težavi.
Depending on where the lack of understanding and trust lies, this exchange can take place among immigrants, with fellow residents, and with government.
Glede na to, kaj je vzrok pomanjkanja razumevanja in zaupanja, lahko ta izmenjava stališč poteka med priseljenci, s sodržavljani ali z vlado.
Participants engage in a process of mutual learning.
Udeleženci se vključijo v proces medsebojnega učenja.
They integrate their different perspectives into a shared understanding of the problem, develop basic trust, and find common ground for working together to solve it.
Svoje različne poglede sestavijo v enako razumevanje težave, vzpostavijo osnovno zaupanje in z združenimi močmi poiščejo skupno podlago za njeno rešitev.
A dialogue platform is a civic space in which to begin an open and respectful exchange of views among immigrants, with fellow residents, or with government.
Platforma za dialog je družbeni prostor, ki omogoči začetek odprte in spoštljive izmenjave mnenj med priseljenci, s sodržavljani ali z vlado.
The objective is for participants to develop shared understanding and trust on a specific problem and find common ground for working together to solve it.
Njen namen je, da udeleženci razvijejo medsebojno razumevanje in zaupanje v zvezi s specifično težavo ter najdejo skupne točke za njeno rešitev z združenimi močmi.
Successful dialogue platforms lead to the formation of working relationships between the participants developing joint public activities, partnerships, and new ongoing consultation mechanisms.
Uspešne platforme za dialog vodijo k vzpostavitvi delovnih odnosov med udeleženci, ki razvijajo skupne javne dejavnosti, partnerstva in nove stalne posvetovalne mehanizme.
This follow-up provides new spaces for meaningful interaction, this time with a broader public.
Te nadaljnje dejavnosti ponujajo nov prostor za plodno interakcijo, tokrat s širšo javnostjo.
In the medium-term, it nurtures new and stronger social and associational networks and government consultation.
Srednjeročno krepijo nove in močnejše socialne mreže in mreže združenj ter posvetovanje z vlado.
The partners form a new organisation, or mainstream cooperation into their organisation’s core business.
Dolgoročno lahko proces, ki ga spodbudi platforma za dialog, zmanjša socialno distanco in vzajemno utrdi socialni kapital in blaginjo vseh prebivalcev.
In either case, this cooperation should stand on its own without the need for the support of a dialogue platform.
Prispeva lahko k združevanju in spremembi identitet na ravni soseščin, mest, morda celo na regionalni, nacionalni ali evropski ravni.
Immigration can raise questions in domestic and foreign politics as to the values that an increasingly diverse Europe have in common.
solidarnost med svojimi narodi ob upoštevanju njihove zgodovine, kulture in tradicij“.