natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A total of 74% of complaints leading to inquiries were submitted by individual citizens, whereas 26% were submitted by companies and associations.
Skupno 74 % pritožb, ki so privedle do preiskav, so vložili posamezni državljani, medtem ko so jih 26 % vložila podjetja in združenja.
Table 3.3: Source of complaints leading to inquiries
Preglednica 3.3: Vir pritožb, ki so privedle do preiskav
Most inquiries opened by the Ombudsman in 2008 concerned the European Commission (66%).
Večina preiskav, ki jih je sprožil varuh človekovih pravic v letu 2008, je zadevala Evropsko komisijo (66 %).
Complainants also targeted the administration of the European Parliament (10%), the European Personnel Selection Office (7%), the Council (3%), and the European Anti-Fraud Office, OLAF (2%)8.
Pritožniki so se tudi pritoževali nad upravo Evropskega parlamenta (10 %) , Evropskim uradom za izbor osebja (7 %), Svetom (3 %) in Evropskim uradom za boj proti goljufijam (Olaf) (2 %)8.
Twenty other EU institutions and bodies were the subject of a further 37 inquiries9.
Dvajset drugih institucij in organov EU je bilo predmet nadaljnjih 37 preiskav9.
Figure 3.7: Institutions and bodies subject to inquiry
Slika 3.7: Institucije in organi, ki so bili predmet preiskav
European Personnel Selection Office eb a A
E v r opski ur ad z a izbor osebja
European Anti-Fraud Office a e A
Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam �
Other Ia n IA
Drugi ��
NOTE In one case, the same inquiry concerned two institutions.
V enem primeru se ista preiskava nanaša na dve instituciji.
These percentages therefore total more than 100%.
Ti odstotki zato skupno znašajo več kot 100 %.
The main types of maladministration alleged in inquiries opened in 2008 were lack of transparency, including refusal of information (36% of inquiries), unfairness or abuse of power (20%), unsatisfactory procedures (9%), negligence (8%), avoidable delay (8%), legal error (7%), discrimination (5%), and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is, failure by the Commission to carry out its role as "guardian of the Treaty" vis-à-vis the Member States (5%).
Glavne vrste domnevne nepravilnosti v preiskavah, sproženih v letu 2008, so se nanašale na pomanjkanje preglednosti, vključno z zavračanjem posredovanja podatkov (36 % primerov), nepravičnost ali zlorabo pooblastil (20 %), nezadovoljive postopke (9 %), malomarnost (8 %), nepotrebne zamude (8 %), pravne napake (7 %) diskriminacijo (5 %) in neizpolnjevanje obveznosti, tj. neuspešnost Komisije pri opravljanju vloge „varuhinje Pogodbe“ v odnosu do držav članic (5 %).
8.In terms of potential OLAF investigations concerning the Ombudsman, it should be noted that, on 2 June 2008, the Ombudsman acceded to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 25 May 1999 concerning internal investigations by OLAF.
8.V zvezi z morebitnimi preiskavami varuha človekovih pravic, ki bi jih lahko opravil Olaf, je treba omeniti, da je varuh človekovih pravic 2. junija 2008 pristopil k Medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu z dne 25. maja 1999 o notranjih preiskavah, ki jih opravi Olaf.
On the same day, the Ombudsman adopted a decision on the terms and conditions for internal investigations in relation to the prevention of fraud, corruption and any illegal activity detrimental to the Communities' interests.9.European Central Bank (4 inquiries), European Medicines Agency (4), Court of Justice of the European Communities (3), Committee of the Regions of the European Union (3), Europol (3), Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (3), European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (2), European Agency for the Management of Operational Co-operation at the External Borders of the EU (2), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (2), European Data Protection Supervisor (1), European Investment Bank (1), Economic and Social Committee of the European Communities (1), European Aviation Safety Agency (1), European Chemical Agency (1), European Agency for Reconstruction (1), Translation Centre for Bodies of the European Union (1), European Research Council Executive Agency (1), European Joint Undertaking for ITER and Development of Fusion Energy (1), Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation (1), Euratom Supply Agency (1).
Istega dne je varuh človekovih pravic sprejel sklep o pogojih za izvajanje notranjih preiskav v zvezi s preprečevanjem goljufij, korupcije in kakršnega koli nezakonitega ravnanja, ki škoduje interesom Skupnosti.9.Evropska centralna banka (4 preiskave), Evropska agencija za zdravila (4), Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti (3), Odbor regij Evropske unije (3), Europol (3), Izvajalska agencija za izobraževanje, avdiovizualno področje in kulturo (3), Evropski center za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja (2), Evropska agencija za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije (2), Urad za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti (2), Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov (1), Evropska investicijska banka (1), Ekonomskosocialni odbor Evropskih skupnosti (1), Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu (1), Evropska agencija za kemikalije (1), Evropska agencija za obnovo (1), Prevajalski center za organe Evropske unije (1), Izvajalska agencija Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta (1), Evropsko skupno podjetje za IteR in razvoj fuzijske energije (1), Izvajalska agencija za konkurenčnost in inovativnost (1), Agencija za oskrbo Euratom (1).
Figure 3.8: Types of maladministration alleged
Slika 3.8: Vrste očitanih nepravilnosti
Lack of transparency, including refusal of information ���
Pomanjkanje preglednosti, vključno z zavrnitvijo posredovanja podatkov ���
Unfairness, abuse of power
Nepravičnost, zloraba pooblastil ��
Unsatisfactory procedures ��
Postopkovne napake ��
Failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations – Article 226 ��
Neizpolnitev obveznosti – člen 226 ��
Other maladministration ��
Druge nepravilnosti ��
= 10 cases
= 10 primerov
In some cases, two or more alleged types of maladministration were examined in the same inquiry.
V nekaterih primerih je ista preiskava preučevala dve ali več vrst nepravilnosti.
Findings of the Ombudsman's inquiries
Ugotovitve preiskav varuha človekovih pravic
As Figure 3.6 above shows, the Ombudsman closed a record number of inquiries (355) in 2008.
Kot je razvidno s slike 3.6, je varuh človekovih pravic v letu 2008 zaključil rekordno število preiskav (355).
This figure is almost twice the number of inquiries closed in 2003.
To število je skoraj dvakrat večje od števila zaključenih preiskav v letu 2003.
Of these, 352 were linked to complaints and three were own-initiative inquiries.
Od tega je 352 preiskav temeljilo na pritožbah, tri preiskave pa so temeljile na lastni pobudi.
Most of the inquiries closed by the Ombudsman in 2008 were closed within one year (52%).
Večina preiskav, ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic zaključil v letu 2008, je bila zaključena v manj kot enem letu (52 %).
Over one-third (36%) were closed within three months.
Več kot tretjina (36 %) jih je bilo zaključenih prej kot v treh mesecih. To vklju-
The Ombudsman closed a record number of inquiries (355) in 2008.
Varuh človekovih pravic v letu 2008 zaključilrekordno število preiskav (355).
Most of the inquiries closed by the Ombudsman in 2008 were closed within one year (52%).
Večina preiskav,ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic zaključil v letu 2008, je bila zaključena v manj kot enemletu (52 %).
able to resolve very quickly, for example, by telephoning the institution concerned to propose a solution10 (see section 2.5 above).
čuje primere, ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic lahko rešil zelo hitro, na primer tako, da je telefoniral zadevni instituciji in ji predlagal rešitev10 (glej razdelek 2.5).
Almost 70% of inquiries were closed within 18 months, while the remaining cases took longer, due to their complexity or to delays.
Skoraj 70 % preiskav je bilo zaključenih v manj kot 18 mesecih, druge pa so bile dolgotrajnejše zaradi zapletenosti primera ali zamud.
The Ombudsman aims to further improve the institution's performance in 2009 by taking even less time to close cases.
Varuh človekovih pravic namerava v letu 2009 izboljšati učinkovitost institucije, tako da bo za zaključek primera potrebnega še manj časa.
It is important to note, in this regard, that the additional work which resulted from the significant rise in the number of complaints from 2004 onwards, has now been completed.
V povezavi s tem je treba omeniti, da je dodatno delo zaradi znatnega povečevanja števila pritožb od leta 2004 zdaj dokončano.
Table 3.4: Cases closed in 2008 following inquiries
Preglednica 3.4: Primeri, ki so bili v letu 2008 zaključeni po preiskavah
Average length of inquiry Cases closed within months Cases closed within months Cases closed within months months % % %
Povprečno trajanje preiskave Primeri, zaključeni prej kot v mesecih Primeri, zaključeni prej kot v mesecih Primeri, zaključeni prej kot v mesecih mesecev % % %
These figures are based on a month consisting of 30 days.
Te številke temeljijo na mesecu, ki traja 30 dni.
It should also be noted that the percentages represent cumulative figures.
Opomniti je treba tudi, da deleži pomenijo skupno število.
10.It also includes cases where the Ombudsman would have conducted a full inquiry were it not that the complainant withdrew the complaint, and cases where the Ombudsman could not proceed with his inquiry due to the complainant's decision to go to Court.
10.Vključuje tudi primere, v katerih bi varuh človekovih pravic izvedel popolno preiskavo, če pritožnik ne bi umaknil pritožbe, in primere, v katerih varuh človekovih pravic ni mogel nadaljevati preiskave, ker se je pritožnik odločil za tožbo.
As can be seen from Figure 3.9, a positive outcome was readily achieved for the complainant in 129 cases closed in 2008 (36% of the total).
Kot je razvidno s slike 3.9, je bil pozitiven izid za pritožnika dosežen v 129 primerih, ki so bili zaključeni v letu 2008 (36 % vseh primerov).
These cases were either settled by the institution or a friendly solution was agreed.
Te primere so rešile institucije ali pa je bila najdena sporazumna rešitev.
The comparable figure for 2007 was 134 cases.
V letu 2007 je bilo takih primerov 134.
In a further 101 cases, the matter was clarified so that no further inquiries were needed, while in 110 cases, the Ombudsman found no maladministration.
V 101 primeru je bila zadeva razjasnjena, tako da niso bile potrebne nadaljnje preiskave, v 110 primerih pa varuh človekovih pravic ni odkril nepravilnosti.
The Ombudsman concluded that there was maladministration in 53 cases, but was nevertheless able to obtain a positive outcome for the complainant in eight such cases, through the acceptance of the draft recommendation that he made to the institution concerned (see Figure 3.10).
Varuh človekovih pravic ni ugotovil nepravilnosti v 53 primerih, vendar mu je kljub temu uspelo doseči pozitiven izid za pritožnika v osmih takih primerih, tako da je institucija sprejela osnutek priporočila, ki ga je varuh človekovih pravic naslovil nanjo (glej sliko 3.10).
These findings are further detailed below11.
Ugotovitve so podrobneje opisane v nadaljevanju.11
Settled by the institution or friendly solution agreed ���
Ze�ila institucija ali rezultat sporazumne re�itve ���
No maladministration found ���
Nepravilnosti niso bile odkrite ���
No further inquiries justified ���
Nadaljnje poizvedbe niso bile utemeljene ���
Maladministration found ��
Kdkrite nepravilnosti ��
NOTE In some cases, inquiries were closed on two or more grounds.
V nekaterih primerih so bile preiskave zaključene na podlagi dveh ali več razlogov.
No maladministration
■■Brez nepravilnosti
In 2008, 110 cases were closed with a finding of no maladministration.
Leta 2008 je bilo 110 primerov zaključenih z ugotovitvijo, da nepravilnosti ni bilo.
This is not necessarily a negative outcome for the complainant, who at least benefits from receiving a full explanation from the institution or body concerned of what it has done, as well as obtaining the Ombudsman's independent analysis of the case.
To ni nujno negativen izid za pritožnika, ki od zadevne institucije ali organa vsaj prejme temeljito obrazložitev dejanja, od varuha pa neodvisno analizo primera.
At the same time, such a finding serves as tangible evidence that the institution or body concerned has acted in conformity with the principles of good administration.
Taka ugotovitev je hkrati tudi otipljiv dokaz, da je zadevna institucija ali organ deloval v skladu z načeli dobrega upravljanja.
Irregularities in a design contest for architects in Austria
Nepravilnosti pri projektnem natečaju za arhitekte v Avstriji
An Austrian architect complained to the Ombudsman about the way in which the Commission dealt with his infringement complaint.
Avstrijski arhitekt se je pritožil varuhu človekovih pravic glede načina, na katerega je Komisija obravnavala njegovo pritožbo zaradi kršitve.
In his complaint to the Commission, the architect alleged that Austria infringed Community law on the award of public service contracts in a number of design contests for architects.
Arhitekt je v pritožbi Komisiji trdil, da je Avstrija kršila pravo Skupnosti o postopkih dodelitve javnih naročil za storitve v več projektnih natečajih za arhitekte.
While the Commission confirmed that Community law had been infringed, it decided not to take any further steps, referring to a modification in the Austrian procurement law which, in its view, ensured that cases such as the present one would not arise again.
Čeprav je Komisija potrdila, da je bilo pravo Skupnosti kršeno, se je odločila, da ne bo ukrepala, in se je sklicevala na spremembo avstrijskega zakona o javnih naročilih, ki je po njenem mnenju zagotovil, da takih primerov ne bo več.
The Ombudsman understood the complainant's disappointment over the Commission's decision not to take any further steps, after nearly five years of dealing with the matter.
Varuh človekovih pravic je razumel razočaranje pritožnika zaradi odločitve Komisije, da ne bo sprejela nadaljnjih ukrepov, po tem ko je to zadevo obravnavala skoraj pet let.
However, he recalled that, according to established case-law, it is within the Commission's discretion to decide whether or not to bring the matter before the courts.
Kljub temu pa je opozoril, da v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso Komisija presoja, ali bo zadevo predala sodišču ali ne. Sklenil je, da je utemeljitev Komisije verodostojna, in je primer zaključil z ugotovitvijo, da ni bilo nobene nepravilnosti.3570/2005/WP 
11.The analysis that follows is based on inquiries closed during 2008.
11.Analiza, ki sledi, temelji na preiskavah, ki so bile zaključene leta 2008.
If an inquiry dealt with more than one allegation or claim, these may have given rise to several findings by the Ombudsman.
Če je bila v preiskavi obravnavana več kot ena obtožba ali zahtevek, je lahko varuh človekovih pravic podal več različnih ugotovitev.
Cases settled by the institution and friendly solutions
■■Primeri, ki jih je rešila institucija, in sporazumne rešitve
The co-operation of the Community insti-
Pri doseganju takih rezultatov, ki pripo-
Whenever possible, the Ombudsman tries to achieve a positive-sum outcome that satisfies both the complainant and the institution complained against.
Varuh človekovih pravic si, če je le mogoče,prizadeva doseči rezultat, s katerim stazadovoljna pritožnik in institucija, zoper katero je vložena pritožba.
During 2008, 125 cases were settled by the institution or body itself following a complaint to the Ombudsman12.
morejo h krepitvi odnosov med institucijami in državljani ter k izogibanju dragim in dolgotrajnim sodnim postopkom, je bistveno sodelovanje institucij in organov Skupnosti.Institucije ali organi so leta 2008 so na podlagi pritožbe varuhu človekovih pravic sami rešili 125 primerov.12
Settlement of payment dispute between research institute and Commission
Rešitev spora med raziskovalnim inštitutom in Komisijo zaradi plačila
In 2004, a Dutch research institute signed a grant agreement with the Commission for a research project on human influenza.
Nizozemski raziskovalni inštitut je leta 2004 s Komisijo podpisal sporazum o dotaciji za raziskovalni projekt o človeški gripi.
In December 2006, the institute turned to the Ombudsman, alleging that the Commission had not paid an instalment of Eur 288 000.
Inštitut se je decembra 2006 obrnil na varuha človekovih pravic in trdil, da Komisija ni plačala obroka v višini 288 000 eur.
The Commission argued that it had not paid the instalment because the institute had not yet delivered an adequate budget table for the project.
Komisija je zatrjevala, da obroka še ni plačala zato, ker inštitut še ni predložil primerne preglednice proračuna za projekt.
The Ombudsman inspected the relevant files and noted that the Commission had, in the meantime, sent the necessary explanations to the institute to allow it to submit such a budget table.
Varuh človekovih pravic je preučil ustrezno dokumentacijo in opazil, da je Komisija medtem inštitutu poslala potrebne razlage in mu omogočila predložitev take preglednice proračuna.
The Commission subsequently announced that it would unblock the final payment.
Komisija je pozneje sporočila, da bo sprostila zadnje izplačilo.
The Ombudsman commended the Commission for its efforts to assist the institute, pointing out that he considered this manner of dealing with complainants as an example of good administration.3794/2006/FOR 
Varuh človekovih pravic je Komisijo pohvalil za prizadevanje, da bi pomagala inštitutu, pri čemer je poudaril, da je tak način obravnave pritožnikov primer dobre prakse.3794/2006/FOR 
If an inquiry leads to a preliminary finding of maladministration, the Ombudsman tries to achieve a friendly solution whenever possible.
vilnosti, poskuša, če je to mogoče, doseči sporazumno rešitev.
Four cases were closed during the year after a friendly solu-If an inquiry leads to a preliminary finding of tion had been achieved.
Med letom so bili po doseženi sporazumni rešitvi zaključeni štirje primeri.
At the end of 2008, 25 proposals for maladministration, the Ombudsman tries to friendly solutions were still under consideration.achieve a friendly solution whenever possible.
Ob koncu leta 2008 se je 25 predlogov za sporazumno rešitev še vedno preučevalo.
Ombudsman achieves friendly solution with Commission on Italian state aid case
Varuh človekovih pravic s Komisijo dosegel sporazumno rešitev pri primeru v zvezi s državno pomočjo Italije
In 1993, an Italian shipping company lodged a complaint with the Commission concerning a Sardinian aid scheme for shipping companies.
Italijanska ladjarska družba je Komisiji leta 1993 predložila pritožbo v zvezi s programom državne pomoči za ladjarske družbe na Sardiniji.
According to the complainant, the aid scheme discriminated against companies established in Sardinia but having their head offices elsewhere.
Pritožnik je zatrdil, da program pomoči diskriminira družbe, ki sicer imajo sedež na Sardiniji, vendar imajo glavni sedež drugje. Komisija je leta 1997 sklenila, da je program pomoči nezakonita državna pomoč in je zato nezdružljiv s skupnim trgom.
In 2000, the European Court of Justice annulled the Commission's decision on procedural grounds.
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je leta 2000 iz proceduralnih razlogov razveljavilo odločbo Komisije.
The Commission, however, did not adopt a new decision.
Vendar pa Komisija ni sprejela nove odločbe.
The Italian company lodged a complaint with the Ombudsman.
Italijansko podjetje je vložilo pritožbo pri varuhu človekovih pravic.
The Ombudsman considered the long delay to be maladministration and proposed a friendly solution.
Ta je menil, da je dolga zamuda primer nepravilnosti, in je predlagal sporazumno rešitev.
In December 2007, the complainant informed the Ombudsman that the Commission had adopted a new decision.2713/2006/IP (Confidential) 
Pritožnik je decembra 2007 varuha človekovih pravic obvestil, da je Komisija sprejela novo odločbo.2713/2006/IP (Zaupno) 
12.As outlined in Chapter 2, 101 of these were cases in which the Ombudsman's intervention succeeded in obtaining a rapid reply to unanswered correspondence.
12.Kot je opisano v poglavju 2, je med temi primeri varuhu človekovih pravic v 101 primeru s posredovanjem uspelo dobiti hiter odgovor na neodgovorjene dopise.
In some cases, the complaint can be settled or a friendly solution can be achieved if the institu- tion or body concerned offers compensation to the complainant.
V nekaterih primerih je pritožbo mogoče rešiti ali doseči sporazumno rešitev, če zadevna insti-
Any such offer is made ex gratia, that is, without admission of legal liability and without creating a legal precedent.
V nekaterih primerih je pritožbo mogoče rešiti alidoseči sporazumno rešitev, če zadevna institucija ali organ pritožniku ponudi odškodnino.
In some cases, the complaint can be settled or a friendly solution can be achieved if the institution or body concerned offers compensation to the complainant.
tucija ali organ pritožniku ponudi odškodnino. V teh primerih gre za dejanja ex gratia: to pomeni brez dopustitve pravne odgovornosti in brez oblikovanja pravnega precedensa.
→→→ Council pays compensation in recognition of inconvenience caused
→→→ Svet je izplačal nadomestilo kot odškodnino za povzročene neprijetnosti
The Council agreed to make an ex gratia payment of Eur 1 000 in recognition of the inconvenience and stress that the complainant had suffered.
Svet se je strinjal, da prostovoljno plača 1 000 eur kot odškodnino za neprijetnosti in stres, ki jih je utrpel pritožnik.
The Council initially offered the complainant a one year contract and then changed the terms when it realised that the complainant would turn 65 during that period.
Svet je pritožniku naprej ponudil enoletno pogodbo, nato pa spremenil njene pogoje, ko je ugotovil, da bo pritožnik v tem času dopolnil 65 let.
The Ombudsman did not find maladministration, however, as regards the complainant's allegation of age discrimination.1162/2007/FOR (Confidential) 
Vendar pa varuh človekovih pravic v zvezi s pritožnikovimi trditvami o diskriminaciji na podlagi starosti ni ugotovil nobene nepravilnosti.1162/2007/FOR (Zaupno) 
Maladministration found
■■Ugotovljene nepravilnosti
The Ombudsman concluded that there was maladministration in 15% of cases closed in 2008.
Varuh človekovih pravic je zaključil, da so bile v 15 % primerov, zaključenih v letu 2008, ugotovljene nepravilnosti.
In 44 such cases, the case was closed with critical remarks to the institution or body concerned (55 cases in 2007).
V 44 takih primerih se je preiskava zaključila s kritično pripombo za zadevno institucijo ali organ (55 primerov v letu 2007).
Eight cases were closed when the institution concerned accepted a draft recommendation made by the Ombudsman.
Osem primerov je bilo zaključenih, ko je institucija sprejela osnutek priporočila, ki ga je podal varuh človekovih pravic.
In one case where the Commission failed to do so, the Ombudsman submitted a special report to the European Parliament.
V enem primeru, v katerem Komisija tega ni naredila, je varuh človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu predložil posebno poročilo.
These findings are analysed in more detail below.
Te ugotovitve so podrobneje analizirane v nadaljevanju.
Figure 3.10: Inquiries where maladministration was found ritical remarls addressed to the institution ��
Slika 3.10: Preiskave, pri katerih so bile ugotovljene nepravilnosti
��% r a L recommendations acce�ted by the institution �
Institucija je sprejela osnutek priporočila �
S�ecial Ze�ort �resented to the uro�ean Warliament �
Evropskemu parlamentu je bilo predstavljeno posebno poročilo �
If a friendly solution is not possible or if the search for such a solution is unsuccessful, the Ombudsman either closes the case with a critical remark to the institution or body concerned or
Če sporazumna rešitev ni mogoča ali če iskanje take rešitve ni uspešno, lahko varuh človekovih pravic zaključi primer s kritično pripombo za zadevno institucijo ali organ ali pa sestavi osnutek