natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission proposes that the presidency of the Union holds an extraordinary social summit devoted to identifying concrete steps to making progress in all of the actions proposed in this communication and in particular to deal with the impact of globalisation and demographic change on more and better jobs.
• Socialni partnerji so vabljeni, da sprejmejo še pomembnejšo vlogo pri razvoju in izvajanju prenovljene lizbonske strategije, zlasti s pripravo skupnih predlogov o tem, kako lahko neposredno prispevajo k njenemu uspehu.
• Social partners are invited to play an even greater role in the development and implementation of the renewed Lisbon strategy, particularly by making joint proposals on how they can directly contribute to its success. e
Komisija predlaga, da predsedstvo Unije skliče izredni socialni vrh, namenjen ugotavljanju konkretnih korakov za napredek pri vseh predlaganih ukrepih v tem sporočilu in zlasti za obvladovanje vpliva globalizacije in demografskih sprememb na številnejša in boljša delovna mesta.
The report highlights that whereas EU-15 productivity growth slowed from 1.4 % in 2004 to 0.5 % in 2005, the EU’s new Member States increased the labour productivity growth rate from 4.1 % in 2004 to 6.2 % in 2005.
Poročilo poudarja, da so, medtem ko je rast produktivnosti EU-15 padla z 1,4 % leta 2004 na 0,5 % leta 2005, nove države članice EU povečale stopnjo rasti produktivnosti dela s 4,1 % leta 2004 na 6,2 % leta 2005.
(6) National reform programmes highlight a variety of promising initiatives.
) 5,9 % skupnih sredstev Evropskega sklada za
) The present average is 29 calendar days.
) Trenutno povprečje znaša 29 koledarskih dni.
(7) 5.9% of the overall envelope of the European Regional Development Fund and the European Social Fund are at present spent on R & D and innovation support. (12) UNICE and ETUC, in a statement issued on 15 March 2005, welcomed the launch of the new Lisbon strategy, committing themselves actively to work in support of the growth and jobs agenda.
) To vključuje predvsem e-zdravje, farmacevtske izdelke, promet in logistiko, okolje, digitalne vsebine ter energetiko in varnost.
They have just agreed a work programme for 2005–08 in support of the strategy.
Nedavno sta se dogovorila o delovnem programu za podporo strategiji za obdobje 2005–2008.
(4) Economic Policy Committee: Report on the Lisbon national reform programmes 2005, ECFIN/EPC(2005)REP/55392, available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_ nance/epc/documents/2005/nationalreports/nrp_report_en.pdf.
(4) Odbor za ekonomsko politiko: Poročilo o lizbonskih programih za nacionalne reforme 2005, ECFIN/EPC(2005)REP/55392, na voljo na naslednjem naslovu: http://europa.eu.int/comm/economy_ nance/epc/documents/2005/nationalreports/nrp_report_en.pdf.
The Employment Committee’s so-called Cambridge review country examinations of the employment sections of the national reform programmes are available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/employment_strategy/emco_en.htm.
Odbor za zaposlovanje: tako imenovana Cambriška ocena nacionalnih pregledov oddelkov za zaposlovanje pri programih nacionalnih reform je na voljo na naslednjem naslovu: http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/ employment_strategy/emco_en.htm.
(9) See Commission communication,‘Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon strategy’ (SEC(2005) 518, 20.4.2005).
(9) Glej sporočilo Komisije„Spodbujanje intelektualnega potenciala Evrope: omogočanje univerzam, da v celoti prispevajo k lizbonski strategiji“ (SEC(2005) 518, 20.4.2005).
(5) All these aspects are highlighted in the report drawn up by a group of authoritative experts established after the Hampton Court meeting under the chairmanship of former Finnish Prime Minister Esko Aho, which argues, inter alia, for the establishment of a pact for R & D. (
(13) Sredstva, namenjena konvergenčnemu cilju, morajo predstavljati najmanj 60 % celotnega nanciranja, sredstva za cilj regionalne konkurence pa 75 %.
Better Regulation — simply explained
Boljša pravna ureditev – preprosta razlaga
European law is at the heart of what makes the European Union special.
Evropska zakonodaja je v osrčju tistega, zaradi česar je Evropska unija nekaj posebnega.
Without it, we would rely on cooperation and goodwill: essential components to make Europe work, but not enough to guarantee the freedoms and rights enjoyed by today’s Europeans.
Brez nje bi se zanašali na sodelovanje in dobro voljo, bistveni sestavini, zaradi katerih Evropa deluje, ki pa ne zadostujeta za zagotovitev svoboščin in pravic, ki jih danes uživajo državljani Evrope.
So we have to ensure that European laws and regulation are well targeted, correctly implemented at the right level, and proportionate to need.
Zato moramo zagotoviti, da so evropski zakoni in predpisi dobro ciljno usmerjeni, da se na ustreznih stopnjah pravilno izvajajo in da so v sorazmerju s potrebami.
Today’s Europe moves quickly.
Današnja Evropa se hitro premika.
To face up to the challenges we face inside and outside Europe, policies, laws and regulations need to adapt to the fast pace of technological change, to foster innovation, to protect the welfare and safety of Europeans.
Če hočemo biti kos izzivom, s katerimi se spopadamo znotraj in izven Evrope, je treba politike, zakone in predpise prilagoditi hitremu tempu tehnoloških sprememb, spodbujati inovacije ter varovati blaginjo in varnost državljanov Evrope.
Public administrations need to be effective, flexible and focused. is is the standard which the European Commission has set itself, and this is why we have made Better Regulation one of our core priorities.
Javne uprave morajo biti učinkovite, prilagodljive in ciljno usmerjene. To je pravilo, ki si ga je postavila Evropska komisija, in zato smo boljšo pravno ureditev uvrstili med naše glavne prednostne naloge.
J M BPresident of the European Commission
J M BPredsednik Evropske komisije
Better Regulation
Boljša pravna ureditev – preprosta razlaga
Public authorities regulate in the public interest to achieve a variety of goals — to ensure a fair and competitive market place, to protect health, to provide safety, to stimulate innovation, to preserve the natural environment.
Javni organi pripravljajo zakonodajo v interesu javnosti, da bi uresničili več ciljev – zagotavljali pošten in konkurenčen trg, varovali zdravje, nudili varnost, spodbujali inovacije, ohranjali naravno okolje.
Regulation is a tool for delivering policies and meeting citizens’ expectations.
Priprava zakonodaje je sredstvo za izvajanje politik in izpolnjevanje pričakovanj državljanov.
In designing policies, laws and regulations, governments are looking to do better — to make sure that they are using the right tools to get the job done; that benefits are maximised, while negative effects are minimised; that the voices of those affected are being heard.
Pri oblikovanju politik, zakonov in predpisov si vlade prizadevajo za čim boljše rešitve – da bi pri svojem delu zagotovo uporabljale prava sredstva, da bi bilo čim več koristi in čim manj negativnih posledic, da imajo prizadeti možnost pritožbe.
Public authorities throughout Europe want to reduce red tape and get rid of unnecessary bureaucracy. e European level is no exception.
Javni organi po vsej Evropi si prizadevajo za zmanjšanje upravnih formalnosti in odpravo nepotrebne birokracije. Tako je tudi na evropski ravni.
Although ‘Brussels’ may be caricatured as being the source of burdensome regulation and red tape, the reality is different.
Čeprav se govori, da je „Bruselj“ vir nadležnih predpisov in upravnih formalnosti, v resnici temu ni tako.
As the starting point for EU law, the European Commission has a special responsibility to regulate better.
Evropska komisija je kot začetna točka zakonodaje EU še posebej odgovorna za to, da pripravlja boljšo zakonodajo.
It is devoting particular energy to improving the quality of its legal proposals, reducing unnecessary and/or overlapping rules and generally making its proposals for laws more understandable.
Veliko energije posveča predvsem izboljšanju kakovosti svojih zakonskih predlogov, zmanjšanju nepotrebnih in/ali prekrivajočih se pravil, skratka temu, da bi bili njeni predlogi zakonov razumljivejši.
It is committed to doing this in an open way, making its deci-sion-making processes more accessible and involving a broad range of stakeholders in policy development. ese efforts are explained in more detail below.
Kot se je zavezala, to počne na očeh javnosti, tako da so njeni postopki odločanja še bolj dostopni in v razvoj politik vključujejo tudi celo vrsto zainteresiranih strani. Ta prizadevanja so podrobneje razložena spodaj.
Why do we regulate?
Zakaj pripravljamo zakonodajo?
In an era of globalisation, in which barriers to movement of goods, services and people are falling, citizens expect their governments to ensure their safety and welfare.
V času globalizacije, ki odpravlja ovire v gibanju blaga, storitev, oseb in kapitala, državljani pričakujejo, da jim bodo njihove vlade zagotavljale varnost in blaginjo.
Businesses expect public authorities to ensure a level playing field and boost competitiveness.
Poslovni svet pričakuje, da bodo javni organi zagotovili enotne pogoje za delo in spodbujali konkurenčnost.
Regulation is key to meeting these challenges.
Zakonodaja je bistvenega pomena pri reševanju teh vprašanj.
It serves many purposes — to protect health by ensuring food safety, to protect the environment by setting air and water quality standards, to set rules for companies competing in the marketplace to create a level playing field.
Služi več ciljem – z zagotavljanjem varnosti hrane varovati zdravje, z določanjem standardov kakovosti zraka in vode varovati okolje, postavljati pravila za podjetja, ki med seboj tekmujejo na tržišču, ter tako ustvariti enotne pogoje za delo.
Regulation is a necessary and accepted aspect of modern society.
Zakonodaja je nujen vidik sodobne družbe, ki
Better Regulation — simply explained
Zakonodajo pripravljamo na vseh stopnjah – lokalni, državni in mednarodni.
But poorly conceived and ill-considered regulation can prove to be excessive and go beyond what is strictly necessary.
Toda slabo zasnovana in pripravljena zakonodaja je lahko čezmerna in izven meja tistega, kar je nujno potrebno.
Some regulation can be overly prescriptive, unjustifi -ably expensive or counterproductive.
Poleg tega je lahko zakonodaja preveč predpisujoča, neopravičljivo draga, lahko pa ima tudi nasprotni učinek od pričakovanega.
Layers of overlapping regulation can develop over time, affecting businesses, the voluntary sector, public authorities and the general public.
Sčasoma lahko pride do prekrivajočih se predpisov, ki vplivajo na podjetja, prostovoljni sektor, javne organe in splošno javnost.
Regulation can also become quickly outdated.
Zakonodaja lahko tudi hitro zastari.
Rapid technological developments, open and expanding global markets and ever-increasing access to information mean that regulation has to be kept under constant review and adapted to keep pace with the fast moving world.
Hiter tehnološki razvoj, odprti in rastoči svetovni trgi ter vse večji dostop do informacij pomenijo, da je treba zakonodajo nenehno pregledovati in posodabljati, če hočemo ostati v koraku s hitro spreminjajočim se svetom.
Why do we regulate at European level?
Zakaj pripravljamo zakonodajo na evropski ravni?
e European Union has many goals.
Evropska unija ima veliko ciljev.
Its Member States have agreed to work together through common policies to achieve these goals. is means Europewide rules, normally proposed by the Commission and agreed by national ministers in the Council and by members of the European Parliament.
Njene države članice so se dogovorile, da bodo s sodelovanjem v skupnih politikah te cilje tudi uresničevale. To pomeni pravila, ki veljajo za celo Evropo in jih ponavadi predlaga Komisija, ministri posameznih držav v Svetu in člani Evropskega parlamenta pa jih potrdijo.
One of the most important EU goals is free movement of goods, services, persons and capital, and much of European legislation is aimed at making this single market work.
Eden najpomembnejših ciljev EU je prost pretok blaga, storitev, oseb, in kapitala, velik del evropske zakonodaje pa je namenjen prav uresničevanju enotnega trga.
Laws are also made at European level in policy areas where EU Member States have agreed on common policies (agriculture, fisheries, trade, customs) and in other areas where they have decided that there is added value in legislating at European level under specific circumstances (environment, justice and home affairs, health and consumer protection).
Na evropski ravni pripravljamo tudi zakone na področju politik, pri katerih so se države članice dogovorile za skupne politike (kmetijstvo, ribištvo, trgovina, carine), in drugih področjih, za katera so se odločile, da zakonodaja, predpisana na evropski ravni, v določenih okoliščinah (okolje, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov) pomeni dodano vrednost.
All of these policies have brought freedoms to Europeans, created jobs and boosted growth — but to work, they need a set of agreed rules that are applied consistently throughout the EU.
Vse te politike državljanom Evrope prinašajo svoboščine, ustvarjajo nova delovna mesta in spodbujajo rast – a da bodo delovale, je potreben sklop dogovorjenih pravil, ki se dosledno uporabljajo po vsej EU.
In most of these areas, the European Commission is responsible for proposing the policies and laws to achieve agreed goals and with making sure that the laws are properly applied.
Na večini teh področij je Evropska komisija odgovorna za to, da predlaga politike in zakone, s katerimi se bodo dosegli dogovorjeni cilji, ter zagotovi, da se zakoni pravilnouporabljajo.
It pays special attention to the need for its proposals to be proportionate to the problem at hand, and for actions to be taken at the right level: the principles of ‘proportionality’ and ‘subsidiarity’ — two principles cemented in the EU Treaty.
Posebno pozornost posveča dejstvu, da morajo biti njeni predlogi sorazmerni z zadevnimi težavami in da je treba ukrepati na ustrezni ravni: to sta načeli „sorazmernosti“ in „subsidiarnosti“, ki sta zapisani v Pogodbi EU.
European regulation — the source of ‘red tape’?
Evropska zakonodaja – vir odvečne birokracije?
One common rule to apply in all Member States is much simpler and more efficient than a complex web of varying rules on the same subject matter at national and regional level.
Eno, skupno pravilo, ki se uporablja v vseh državah članicah, je veliko preprostejše in učinkovitejše kot zapletena mreža različnih pravil za isto stvar na državni in regionalni ravni.
European legislation has been effective in removing harmful barriers that distort competition and create conflict between different national systems.
Evropska zakonodaja uspešno odpravlja škodljive ovire, ki izkrivljajo konkurenčnost in ustvarjajo konflikte med različnimi državnimi sistemi.
e body of European law has expanded over the past two decades. e objective of creating a single market by 1992 generated a wave of European legislation — Europewide standards that replaced the complex set of national rules.
Obseg evropske zakonodaje se je v preteklih dveh desetletjih povečal. Cilj, da se do leta 1992 vzpostavi enotni trg, je povzročil val evropske zakonodaje – po celi Evropi veljavnih standardov, ki so nadomestili obsežen sklop državnih pravil.
Legislation has also been agreed in other areas with a cross-border dimension, such as the environment, health and consumer protection.
Na evropski ravni se pripravi tudi zakonodaja drugih področij s čezmejnimi razsežnostmi, kot so okolje, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov.
Increasingly, Member States seek a Europewide response, whether through legislation or otherwise, to new and emerging transnational challenges such as health pandemics, drug traffic and illegal migration.
Države članice preko zakonodaje ali drugače vse bolj iščejo vseevropske odzive na nove in porajajoče se mednarodne izzive, kot so pandemije, trgovanje z drogami in nezakonito priseljevanje.
New technologies — telecoms, medicines, biotechnology — are recognised as needing common rules to develop on a European scale.
Znano je, da je za nove tehnologije – telekomunikacije, medicino, biotehnologijo – treba oblikovati pravila na evropski ravni.
With this expansion of EU legislation, some areas of overlap and duplication were inevitable. e means and instruments chosen for certain policies may not always have been strictly proportionate to the aims.
Zaradi širitve obsega zakonodaje EU je bilo neizbežno, da se nekatera področja prekrivajo in podvajajo. Sredstva in instrumenti, izbrani za določene politike, morda niso bili vedno povsem sorazmerni s cilji.
Certain series of European laws and regulations which have developed over time offer scope for simplification to eliminate any unnecessary layers. ere is also a need to look at the cumulative burden of different laws and reduce any redundant, overlapping requirements.
Za nekatere sklope evropskih zakonov in predpisov, ki so se v teh letih razvili, se ponuja možnost poenostavitve, ki bi odpravila kakršne koli nepotrebne plasti. Treba bi bilo tudi pregledati skupne obremenitve različnih zakonov in zmanjšati kakršne koli odvečne, prekrivajoče se zahteve.
However, the perception that EU laws are particularly responsible for red tape is wrong.
Vendar pa je prepričanje, da so za odvečno birokracijo krivi predvsem zakoni EU, napačno.
Some claims of ‘Brussels bureaucracy’ turn out to have national laws as their source. e EU often pursues its objectives by adopting ‘directives’ setting out broad principles and objectives and leaving implementation to be defined by the Member States.
Pri nekaterih pritožbah nad „bruseljsko birokracijo“ se je izkazalo, da težava izvira iz zakonov posameznih držav. EU pogosto skuša uresničiti svoje cilje s sprejemanjem „direktiv“, ki določajo široka načela in cilje, njihovo izvajanje pa prepušča državam članicam.
Member States can then choose how to meet the goals of the directive, adapting to their own institutional and administrative cultures.
Države članice se lahko potem same odločijo, kako bodo uresničile cilje direktive, ki jih prilagodijo svoji institucionalni in upravni kulturi.
Indeed, surveys consistently show that, in the minds of citizens and businessmen, ‘red tape’ is associated with areas of regulation that are not primarily dealt with at European level — such as taxation, labour laws, and planning and construction permits.
Raziskave nenehno kažejo, da ljudje „odvečno birokracijo“ povezujejo s področji zakonodaje, ki se prvotno ne obravnavajo na evropski ravni – kot so obdavčevanje, delovno pravo ter načrtovanje in gradbena dovoljenja.
In 2005, it was claimed that the EU had forced local authorities to remove see-saws from children’s playgrounds.
Leta 2005 se je govorilo, da je EU prisilila lokalne organe, da so z otroških igrišč odstranili gugalnice.
In fact, there were no EU measures in this area.
V resnici EU na tem področju ni predpisala nobenih ukrepov.
There are some standards set by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), a voluntary organisation made of national standards bodies.
Obstajajo standardi, ki jih določa Evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN), prostovoljna organizacija, sestavljena iz nacionalnih teles za standardizacijo.
These sought to limit the height from which children could fall, by specifying the maximum height for seats and stands, and by xing standards for hand supports and footrests.
Cilj je bil omejiti višino, s katere bi lahko otroci padli, in sicer tako, da se določijo največja možna višina sedežev in stojišč ter standardi za podpore za roke in podnožnike.
Manufacturers could choose whether to follow these standards, which carried the advantage of being able to export across Europe, instead of having to apply for certification in each country.
Izdelovalci so se lahko sami odločili, ali bodo te standarde upoštevali in s tem imeli to prednost, da bi lahko svoje izdelke izvažali po celi Evropi, ali pa bodo za potrdilo prosili vsako državo posebej.
Another often cited example is chocolate cigarettes.
Podoben, pogosto omenjen primer, so čokoladne cigarete.
Ending the sale of sweets in the form of cigarettes is an idea championed by the World Health Organisation — with the sensible intention of preventing the spread of a smoking culture in the young.
Odpraviti prodajo sladkarij v obliki cigaret je zamisel, za katero se je zavzemala Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija – s pametnim namenom preprečiti širjenje kajenja med mladimi.
This was taken up in a Council recommendation, a non-legally binding recommendation which simply invites Member States to take action.
To je povzelo priporočilo Sveta, ki je pravno nezavezujoče in države članice samo poziva k ukrepanju.
What is the European Commission doing to reduce ‘red tape’?
Kako si Evropska komisija prizadeva zmanjšati odvečno birokracijo?
e European Commission has embarked on an ambitious ‘Better Regulation’ exercise.
Evropska komisija se je lotila ambiciozne naloge pripravljanja boljše pravne ureditve.
A far-reaching programme was launched in 2002 to simplify and generally improve the regulatory environment.
Daljnosežen program, ki se je začel leta 2002, naj bi poenostavil in na splošno izboljšal zakonodajno okolje.
It is designed to cut red tape, improve the quality of regulation and design better laws for consumers and business alike.
Zasnovan je tako, da bi zmanjšal odvečno birokracijo, izboljšal kakovost pravne ureditve in ustvaril boljše zakone tako za potrošnike kot za podjetja.
is means taking action at different stages in the policy cycle: looking at new initiatives, proposals still under negotiation and legislation already on the books. e Better Regulation programme therefore included a mix of different actions:
To pomeni ukrepanje na različnih stopnjah političnega cikla: pregledovanje novih pobud, predlogov, ki so še predmet pogajanj, in zakonodaje, ki je že napisana. Program boljše pravne ureditve je zato vključeval celo vrsto različnih ukrepov:
• introducing a system for assessing the impact and improving the design of major Commission proposals; • implementing a programme of simplification of existing legislation;
• ki uvajajo sistem za presojo vpliva in izboljšavo glavnih predlogov Komisije; • ki izvajajo program poenostavitve obstoječe zakonodaje;• s katerimi bomo preverili, ali bi bilo treba predloge Komisije, ki jih še pregledujeta Svet ministrov in Evropski parlament, umakniti;
• testing Commission proposals still being looked at by the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament, to see whether they should be withdrawn;• factoring consultation into all Commission initiatives; • looking at alternatives to laws and regulations (such as self-regulation, or co-regula-tion by the legislator and interested parties).
• ki v vse pobude Komisije vključujejo posvetovanje; • ki za zakone in predpise iščejo druge možnosti (kot sta samoregulacija in koregulacija s strani zakonodajalca in zainteresiranih strank).
All of these actions are delivering positive results.
Vsi ti ukrepi dajejo pozitivne rezultate.
An important part of making better laws is having a full picture of their impacts.
Pomemben del pripravljanja boljših zakonov je v celoti poznati njihove vplive.
Proposals can then be tailored to have the best effect, and to minimise negative side-effects. e Commission is committed to examining the economic, social and environment impacts of its proposals.
Tako lahko predloge prilagodimo tako, da bodo imeli čim boljši učinek in čim manj negativnih stranskih učinkov. Naloga Komisije je, da preuči gospodarske, socialne in okoljske vplive svojih predlogov.
It has made impact assessment compulsory for major policy proposals and, since 2003, the Commission has completed over 150 impact assessments. e result has been a marked change in how policy is shaped inside the European Commission.
Presoja vpliva je zato obvezen sestavni del glavnih predlogov politik, od leta 2003 pa je Komisija izvršila že več kot 120 presoj vpliva. Rezultat tega je vidna sprememba pri oblikovanju politike znotraj Evropske komisije.