natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission supervision is intended to ensure that Member State control systems are established and operating as required and mitigate the risk of control failures in Member States.
Komisija je za proračunsko podporo pripravila posebne smernice, ki določajo, da so plačila odvisna od doseganja zadovoljivega napredka.
The Court's audit findings indicate that this was not fully achieved.
Vendar v vseh preučenih primerih uporabljeni kazalniki uspešnosti niso bili časovno opredeljeni, jasni, nedvoumni in dosegljivi.
The Commission’s system of checks on its own payments and contracts was generally effective.
Komisijine revizije, ki jih je preučilo Sodišče, so bile večinoma ustrezno načrtovane in izvedene, vendar so bili popravni ukrepi v več kot tretjini primerov izvedeni pozno ali pa je bila ocena otežena zaradi revizijske dokumentacije.
However, in the specific case of Bulgaria the national systems contained significant weaknesses.
Komisijin nadzor je namenjen zagotavljanju, da so kontrolni sistemi držav članic vzpostavljeni in da delujejo, kot je zahtevano, ter da blažijo tveganje neuspešnih kontrol v državah članicah.
For budget support the Commission has developed specific guidelines whereby the payments are conditional on satisfactory progress being made.
Revizijske ugotovitve Sodišča kažejo, da to ni bilo v celoti doseženo.
However, the performance indicators used were not time-bound, clear, unambiguous and achievable in all the cases examined.
Do napak na ravni izvajalskih organizacij pogosto prihaja zaradi slabosti v njihovih finančnih postopkih.
The complete and detailed audit findings can be found in Chapter 8 of the report.
Celovite in podrobne revizijske ugotovitve so v poglavju 6 poročila.
Box 6 - SPS entitlements: examples of system weaknesses in the EAGF
Okvir 6 – Pravice SEP: primeri slabosti sistemov v EKJS
Recommendations The Court recommends: o
Sodišče priporoča: o številne ukrepe za uspešnejše preprečevanje napak na začetnih stopnjah projekta v sodelovanju z nosilci projektov, npr. organi upravljanja/posredniška telesa bi morali zgodaj stopiti v stik z nosilci projektov, da jih seznanijo z zahtevami;
The Court found that a number of entitlements audited were erroneously calculated either due to a failure to take account of changes in land parcels or to the non-deduction of ineligible areas.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so bile številne revidirane pravice napačno izračunane bodisi zato, ker niso bile upoštevane spremembe zemljiških parcel, bodisi zato, ker niso bile odštete neupravičene površine.
Furthermore, payments were made to a number of farmers who did not hold entitlements, while various instances were noted of misuse of the national reserve, which should only be used to allocate entitlements to new farmers, those in special situations or those affected by restructuring or development programmes.
Poleg tega so bila plačila izvršena številnim kmetom brez pravic, hkrati pa so bili opaženi različni primeri napačne uporabe nacionalne rezerve, ki se uporablja samo za dodeljevanje pravic novim kmetom, kmetom v posebnih razmerah ali kmetom, ki so jih prizadeli programi prestrukturiranja ali razvojni programi.
a number of steps to reinforce the prevention of errors during the early stages of a project through working with the project promoters, e.g. managing authorities/intermediate bodies should make early contact with the project promoters to familiarise them with requirements; o the Commission where possible to use the simplification provided for in the regulations and rules, without undermining the effectiveness of the spending;
o da Komisija, kjer je to mogoče, uporabi poenostavitev, ki jo predvidevajo uredbe in pravila, ne da bi bila pri tem ogrožena uspešnost porabe; o
The Court recommends that system weaknesses leading to errors are resolved, e.g. further significant efforts are needed to ensure that beneficiaries respect their obligations in the area of rural development.
Sodišče priporoča, da se odpravijo slabosti sistemov, ki povzročajo napake; potrebna so na primer precejšnja dodatna prizadevanja, da se zagotovi, da upravičenci spoštujejo svoje obveznosti na področju razvoja podeželja.
Concerning the SPS, the most urgent issues to address are: the Commission to make maximum use for the 2007-2013 period of the work of the Audit Authorities in the Member States, but at the same time to monitor this work in order to ensure that it is up to standard; o improving the identification, registration and management of the entitlements; o the Commission to make effective use of the correctiveinstruments at its disposal, like payment suspension, financial corrections and recoveries.
Najbolj pereča vprašanja, ki jih je treba rešiti pri SEP, so: da Komisija uspešno uporablja instrumente za popravo stanja, ki so ji na voljo, kot so ustavitev plačil, finančni popravki in izterjave.
The Court takes note that these recommendations may have considerable resource implications.
Sodišče se zaveda, da imajo lahko ta priporočila precejšnje posledice za sredstva.
eliminating from the database ineligible areas and beneficiaries and ensuring up-to-date information on land parcels; and o clarifying and simplifying the rules underpinning the measures.
o brisanje neupravičenih površin in upravičencev iz podatkovne zbirke in zagotavljanje najnovejših informacij o zemljiških parcelah ter o pojasnitev in poenostavitev pravil, na katerih temeljijo ukrepi.
AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES: LEVEL OF ERROR
KMETIJSTVO IN NARAVNI VIRI: STOPNJA NAPAK ŠE VEDNO
1STILL MATERIAL
1 POMEMBNA
Rural development, which represents 20 % of all spending, accounts for a disproportionately large part of the overall error rate.
Razvoj podeželja, ki predstavlja 20 % vse porabe, predstavlja nesorazmerno velik delež skupne stopnje napak.
The Court found errors relating to farmers who did not meet eligibility criteria in agri-environmental schemes.
Sodišče je odkrilo napake pri kmetih, ki niso izpolnjevali meril za upravičenost v kmetijsko-okoljskih shemah.
There were also errors in the area of interest rate subsidies (cheaper loans to encourage rural development) due to inadequate procedures to ensure that the payment of EU subsidies to final beneficiaries could be verified.
Napake so se pojavljale tudi pri subvencijah obrestnih mer (cenejša posojila za spodbujanje razvoja podeželja) zaradi neustreznih postopkov, ki ne zagotavljajo možnosti preverjanja plačil subvencij EU končnim upravičencem.
Funds for supporting farmers, rural development and market intervention - 51 billion euro
Sredstva za podporo kmetom, razvoju podeželja in intervencijam na trgih - 51 milijard EUR
For EAGF expenditure the Court estimates the value of the error rate to be slightly below 2%.
Za odhodke EKJS Sodišče ocenjuje, da je vrednost stopnje napak nekoliko pod 2 %.
Here it found errors such as unreliable data on olive oil cultivation leading to over-payments.
Pri tem je odkrilo napake, kot so nezanesljivi podatki o pridelavi oljčnega olja, ki so povzročale preplačila.
In general, errors in the SPS are often due to farmers over-claiming and/or entitlements being wrongly calculated.
Na splošno so napake v SEP pogosto posledica tega, da kmetje vlagajo previsoke zahtevke in/ali da so pravice napačno izračunane.
Also for direct coupled payments, the Court found errors related to farmers over- claiming or exaggerating land area or the number of animals.
Tudi pri neposrednih vezanih plačilih je Sodišče odkrilo napake, povezane s previsokimi zahtevki, ki so jih vložili kmetje, ali njihovim navajanjem prevelike površine zemljišč ali števila živali.
In other EAGF schemes not covered by IACS, the Court found errors such as failure by the Member States to charge interest on debts, weaknesses in controls concerning export refunds, e.g. refunds to farmers to cover the difference between EU internal and world market prices, and missing quantities of rice from public storage.
V drugih shemah EKJS, ki jih ne pokriva IAKS, je Sodišče odkrilo napake, med katerimi so nezaračunavanje obresti za dolgove s strani držav članic, slabosti v kontrolah pri izvoznih nadomestilih, npr. nadomestila kmetom za pokritje razlike med cenami na notranjem trgu EU in cenami na svetovnem trgu, ter manjkajoče količine riža v javnih skladiščih.
IACS - an effective system given certain conditions
IAKS – uspešen sistem pod določenimi pogoji
Although there is still production support to farmers for certain foodstuffs such as rice (so called direct coupled payments), the lion's share of spending on agriculture and natural resources (56% ) is now devoted to payments based on the number of hectares of eligible land in good agricultural and environmental condition ("decoupling" aid from production).
Čeprav kmetje še vedno dobivajo proizvodno pomoč za nekatera živila, kot je riž (tako imenovana neposredna vezana plačila), je levji delež porabe za kmetijstvo in naravne vire (56 %) namenjen plačilom, ki temeljijo na številu hektarjev upravičenih zemljišč v dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih ("razvezovanje" pomoči in proizvodnje).
The main scheme is called the Single Payment Scheme (SPS).
Glavna shema se imenuje shema enotnega plačila (SEP).
To claim the aid, farmers need to have entitlements (one per hectare). These entitlements are allocated by Member States, based on different models, and are registered in the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS).
Za pridobitev pomoči morajo imeti kmetje pravice (ena pravica na hektar), ki jih dodelijo države članice na podlagi različnih modelov in se evidentirajo v integriranem administrativnem in kontrolnem sistemu (IAKS).
IACS also includes databases of agricultural parcels and animals kept, and provides for controls of the eligibility of the farmers' claims.
IAKS vsebuje tudi podatkovne zbirke o kmetijskih parcelah in živalih ter zagotavlja kontrole upravičenosti zahtevkov, ki so jih vložili kmetje.
IACS continues to be effective in limiting the risk of irregular expenditure where properly implemented and if accurate and reliable data on entitlements are introduced.
IAKS še naprej uspešno omejuje tveganje nepravilnih odhodkov, če se pravilno izvaja in če se vanj vnašajo zanesljivi podatki o pravicah.
The recent introduction in SPS of support schemes, such as those related to olive oil, is a positive development although in the short term might lead to a higher frequency of errors.
Nedavna uvedba shem pomoči, kot so sheme za oljčno olje, v SEP, predstavlja pozitiven razvoj, čeprav se lahko kratkoročno zaradi tega pogostost napak poveča.
The correct calculation and allocation of entitlements is a prerequisite for correct payment in the first and all subsequent years.
Pravilen izračun in dodelitev pravic sta prva pogoja za pravilno plačilo v prvem in vseh naslednjih letih.
However, the Court considers that the systems for calculating the entitlements were only partially effective and that they do not yet provide reasonable assurance that the annual SPS payments are correct.
Vendar Sodišče meni, da so bili sistemi za izračunavanje pravic samo delno uspešni in da še ne nudijo razumnega zagotovila, da so letna plačila iz SEP pravilna.
For production support in the form of direct coupled payments, the Court found a number of systems weaknesses in both administrative and on-the spot controls of aid for crops etc, while IACS proved reliable for aid for animals.
Pri proizvodni pomoči v obliki neposrednih vezanih plačil je Sodišče za pomoč za poljščine itn. ugotovilo številne slabosti sistemov tako pri administrativnih pregledih kot pri pregledih na kraju samem, medtem ko se je pri pomoči za živali IAKS izkazal za zanesljivega.
Virtually all agriculture and natural resources expenditure is paid out by Paying Agencies at national or regional level. They also carry out administrative checks on all claims and a series of on-the-spot checks of a sample of claims.
Praktično vse odhodke za kmetijstvo in naravne vire izplačujejo plačilne agencije na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni, ki izvajajo tudi administrativne preglede vseh zahtevkov, določen vzorec zahtevkov pa pregledajo na kraju samem.
Paying Agencies prepare annual accounts which, after being audited by a certifying body, provide the basis for the Commission's approval of expenditure - in technical terms, the clearance of accounts.
Plačilne agencije pripravijo letne obračune, ki jih revidira certifikacijski organ in so podlaga za Komisijino potrditev odhodkov – tehnično rečeno, za potrditev obračunov.
This includes annual financial clearances as well as wider-ranging multiannual conformity clearances where corrections are made based on detected irregularities in previous expenditure.
Ta zajema letne finančne potrditve obračunov ter odločbe o skladnosti, v katerih se sprejmejo popravki na podlagi nepravilnosti, odkritih v prejšnjih odhodkih, in se nanašajo na več let.
Clearance is carried out in order to establish the amounts definitively charged to the EU budget.
Namen te potrditve je ugotoviti, za katere zneske se dokončno bremeni proračun EU.
The Court furthermore found weaknesses in the national databases (part of IACS) where all agricultural areas are recorded.
Sodišče je ob tem ugotovilo tudi slabosti v nacionalnih podatkovnih zbirkah (ki so del IAKS), kjer se evidentirajo vse kmetijske površine.
In addition, the statistics on the Paying Agencies inspection results addressing legality and regularity were not validated by certifying bodies at the level of final beneficiaries, nor has the Commission verified the reliability of these statistics.
Poleg tega statističnih podatkov o rezultatih inšpekcijskih pregledov o zakonitosti in pravilnosti, ki jih izvajajo plačilne agencije, certifikacijski organi niso potrdili na ravni končnega upravičenca niti ni Komisija preverila zanesljivosti teh statističnih podatkov.
The Court found the controls carried out to verify farmers' compliance with the relevant requirements in rural development to be deficient.
Sodišče je prišlo do zaključka, da na transakcije, povezane z odhodki, prijavljenimi za to skupino politik, kot celoto vpliva pomembna stopnja napak glede zakonitosti in/ali pravilnosti.
Reasons for this included imprecise national definitions of eligibility and complex rules, particularly those related to agri-environmental measures.
Sodišče je ocenilo, da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi delno uspešni.
The Court concluded that the transactions underlying the expenditure declared for the policy group, taken as a whole, are affected by a material level of error of legality and/or regularity.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da so kontrole, s katerimi se preverja, ali kmetje upoštevajo relevantne zahteve na področju razvoja podeželja, pomanjkljive.
The Court’s assessment of the supervisory and control systems is that they are partially effective.
Med razlogi za to so bile nenatančne nacionalne opredelitve upravičenosti in zapletena pravila, zlasti tista, ki se nanašajo na kmetijskookoljske ukrepe.
Rural development most error-prone, but problems also in other areas
Napake najpogostejše na področju razvoja podeželja, težave tudi na drugih področjih
The Court's estimate of the overall level of error in Agriculture and natural resources is not significantly different from the value obtained last year, but does not take account of certain serious errors which could not be quantified.
Po ocenah Sodišča skupna stopnja napak na področju kmetijstva in naravnih virov ni bistveno drugačna o lani ugotovljene vrednosti, vendar pri tem niso upoštevane nekatere resne napake, ki jih ni možno količinsko opredeliti.
For all agricultural expenditure - IACS and non-IACS - the Court notes that the Commission's yearly financial clearance decisions are limited to ensuring that the Paying Agencies' accounts are complete and accurate.
Sodišče za vse kmetijske odhodke, tiste, ki so zajeti v IAKS in tiste, ki niso, opaža, da so letne odločbe Komisije o finančni potrditvi omejene samo na preverjanje, ali so računovodski izkazi plačilnih agencij celoviti in točni.
The legality and regularity of payments are only addressed in multiannual conformity decisions.
Zakonitost in pravilnost plačil sta obravnavni samo v večletnih odločbah o skladnosti.
Therefore, financial clearance decisions do not mean that expenditure "cleared" is free from irregular payments.
Zaradi tega odločbe o finančni potrditvi ne zagotavljajo, da v "potrjenih" odhodkih ni nepravilnih plačil.
The Court's audit of the 2007 conformity decisions found that there was expenditure that should not have been approved by the Commission and some conformity audits were not carried out in time to allow recovery of the full amount of the possible irregularities found.
Revizija odločb o skladnosti za leto 2007, ki jo je opravilo Sodišče, je pokazala, da obstajajo odhodki, ki jih Komisija ne bi smela odobriti, nekatere revizije skladnosti pa niso bile opravljene pravočasno, da bi omogočile izterjavo celotnega zneska ugotovljenih možnih nepravilnosti.
The complete and detailed audit findings can be found in Chapter 5 of the report.
Celovite in podrobne revizijske ugotovitve so v poglavju 5 poročila.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2007
LETNO POROČILO O DEJAVNOSTIH 2007
ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2007
ILO O DEJAVNOSTIH 2007
THE COURT’S ROLE AND WORK
VLOGA IN DELO SODIŠČA
GOVERNANCE AND ORGANISATION
UPRAVLJANJE IN ORGANIZACIJA
OVERVIEW OF AUDIT REPORTS AND OPINIONS
PREGLED REVIZIJSKIH POROČIL IN MNENJ
FOLLOWUP AND IMPACT
NADALJNJE UKREPANJE IN UČINEK
THE COURT’S VIEW
STALIŠČE SODIŠČA
THE COURT’S WORK IN 2007 AND BEYOND
DELO SODIŠČA V LETU 2007 IN V PRIHODNJE
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANČNE INFORMACIJE
Bringing the European Court of Auditors closer to EU citizens is one of our key objectives and part of our mission to promote transparency and accountability.
Eden od naših ključnih ciljev in del našega poslanstva pri spodbujanju preglednosti in odgovornosti je približati Evropsko računsko sodišče državljanom EU.
I, therefore, take great pleasure in welcoming you to the first annual activity report of the European Court of Auditors.
Zato me zelo veseli, da vam lahko predstavim prvo letno poročilo o dejavnostih Evropskega računskega sodišča.
It provides an overview of the Court and an account of its activities in 2007, a year in which it celebrated its 30th anniversary as the external auditor of the EU dedicated to contributing to improving financial management and acting as the independent guardian of the financial interests of its citizens.
Vsebuje pregled Sodišča in poroča o njegovih dejavnostih v letu 2007, ko je praznovalo svojo 30. obletnico v vlogi zunanjega revizorja EU, ki prispeva k izboljševanju finančnega poslovodenja in deluje kot neodvisni varuh finančnih interesov državljanov Unije.
The main contribution the Court makes is through its audits and reports which help the auditee to improve their financial management and which assist the Discharge Authority (the European Parliament and Council) in overseeing the implementation of the EU budget.
Glavni prispevek Sodišča so revizije in poročila, ki revidirancem pomagajo izboljšati njihovo finančno poslovodenje ter organoma za razrešnico (Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu) pomagajo nadzirati izvrševanje proračuna EU.
This report gives an overview of audit reports published in 2007.
V tem poročilu je podan pregled revizijskih poročil, objavljenih leta 2007.
It highlights the main conclusions issued on the implementation of the EU budget 2006 and on the sound financial management of EU funds.
V njem so poudarjeni glavni zaključki o izvrševanju proračuna EU v letu 2006 in o dobrem finančnem poslovodenju sredstev EU.
The Court not only reports on past financial management, it also actively contributes to building the EU’s financial control framework.
Sodišče ne poroča samo o finančnem poslovodenju v preteklosti, temveč tudi dejavno prispeva k izgradnji okvira finančne kontrole EU.
The year 2007 was a significant one for the management of EU funds.
Leto 2007 je bilo za upravljanje sredstev EU zelo pomembno.
The section, ‘The Court’s view’, summarises the Court’s opinion on important developments relating to Member States’ accountability and the Court’s contribution to the public consultation on budgetary reform launched by the European Commission.
V oddelku „Stališče Sodišča“ sta povzeta mnenje Sodišča o pomembnih spremembah, povezanih z odgovornostjo držav članic, in prispevek Sodišča k javnemu posvetovanju o reformi proračuna, ki jo je začela Evropska komisija.
None of the Court’s achievements in 2007 could have happened without the commitment, skills and capacity of its 850 staff.
Nobeden od dosežkov Sodišča v letu 2007 ne bi bil mogoč brez zavzetosti, znanja in sposobnosti njegovih 850 uslužbencev.
They are the key asset of a forward-looking organisation striving for continuous improvement.
Ti so za v prihodnost usmerjeno organizacijo, ki si prizadeva za stalne izboljšave, ključnega pomena.
This first annual activity report gives details of the Court’s reform process which started in 2006 with a self-assessment.
Prvo letno poročilo o dejavnostih navaja podrobnosti o postopku reforme Sodišča, ki se je začela s samooceno leta 2006.
The year 2007 saw progress on implementing the resulting action plan and, at the end of the year, the launch of a ‘peer review’ conducted by a team of auditors from the national audit institutions of Austria, Canada, Norway and Portugal.
Leta 2007 je prišlo do napredka pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta, do katerega je privedla samoocena, na koncu leta pa do začetka „medsebojnega pregleda“, ki ga je izvedla skupina revizorjev iz nacionalnih revizijskih institucij Norveške, Kanade, Avstrije in Portugalske.
An early achievement of this process of reform was the following statement of mission, vision, values and strategic objectives which will guide the activities we look forward to reporting on in future years.
Eden od prvih dosežkov tega procesa reforme je bila opredelitev poslanstva, vizije, vrednot in strateških ciljev, ki je navedena v nadaljevanju in bo usmerjala dejavnosti, o katerih bomo lahko poročali v prihodnjih letih.
I hope you enjoy reading our first annual activity report and fi nd it useful.
Upam, da boste uživali ob branju našega prvega letnega poročila o dejavnostih in boste zadovoljni z njegovo uporabnostjo.
The European Court of Auditors is the EU institution established by the Treaty to carry out the audit of EU finances.
Evropsko računsko sodišče je institucija EU, ki je bila ustanovljena s Pogodbo, da bi izvajala revidiranje financ EU.
As the EU’s external auditor, it contributes to improving EU financial management and acts as the independent guardian of the financial interests of the citizens of the Union.
Kot zunanji revizor EU prispeva k izboljševanju finančnega poslovodenja EU in deluje kot neodvisni varuh finančnih interesov državljanov Unije.
An independent and dynamic Court of Auditors, recognised for its integrity and impartiality, respected for its professionalism and for the quality and impact of its work, and providing crucial support to its stakeholders to improve the management of EU finances. finances.
Neodvisno in dinamično Računsko sodišče, znano po svoji poštenosti in nepristranskosti, spoštovano zaradi svoje strokovnosti ter kakovosti in učinka svojega dela, ki zainteresiranim stranem zagotavlja bistveno podporo pri izboljševanju upravljanja financ EU.
Adding value
Dodajanje vrednosti
Valuing individuals, developing talents, and rewarding performance.
Ceniti posameznike, razvijati nadarjenost in nagrajevati uspešnost.
Keeping high and exemplary standards in all professional aspects.
Ohraniti visoke in zgledne standarde v vseh strokovnih vidikih.
Being involved in EU and worldwide public audit development.
Izdelovati relevantna, pravočasna poročila visoke kakovosti, osnovana na trdnih ugotovitvah in dokazih, ki obravnavajo skrbi zainteresiranih strani in katerih sporočilo je močno in veljavno.
Ensuring effective communication to promote a team spirit.
Zagotoviti uspešno komunikacijo zaradi spodbujanja skupinskega duha.
Providing adequate output to stakeholders without seeking instructions or succumbing to pressure from any outside source.
Zagotoviti ustrezne izložke zainteresiranim stranem brez navodil ali podleganja pritiskom kakršnega koli zunanjega vira.