natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The abovementioned judgment in Mobistar also tends towards the similar use of an analytical model.
Tudi zgoraj navedena sodba Mobistar se nagiba v smer enake uporabe analitičnega modela.
In that judgment, in relation to prices charged for ensuring the portability of telephone numbers, the Court accepted the advance setting of maximum prices which could be charged by the operator, using a theoretical cost model, provided that the charges were cost-orientated in such a way that consumers were not dissuaded from making use of the portability facility.
Sodi�če v tej sodbi glede zahtevanih cen za zagotavljanje prenosljivosti telefonskih �tevilk dopu�ča vnaprej�njo določitev najvi�jih cen, ki jih lahko zahteva obratovalec, z uporabo teoretičnega modela stro�kov, če se cene določijo glede na stro�ke, tako da uporabniki niso odvrnjeni od uporabe storitve prenosljivosti.
The Court also emphasised that it was entirely possible that these maximum prices
Sodi�če tudi poudarja, da ni popolnoma izključeno, da se te najvi�je cene lahko izkažejo za „previsoke“ v primer-
Such models can be used inter alia to apply an efficiency criterion to limit charges
Ti modeli se lahko uporabljajo predvsem za to, da se na podlagi merila učinkovitosti omejijo cene, ki bi bile glede na dejanske
41 — See the fifth recital of Recommendation 98/322, which specifically mentions bottomup economic/engineering models, which are becoming highly sophisticated, although they are as yet imperfect.
43 – Priporočilo Komisije 2005/698/ES z dne 19. septembra 2005 o ločenem računovodstvu in sistemih stro�kovnega računovodstva na osnovi regulativnega okvira za elektronske komunikacije (UL L 266, str. 64), osma uvodna izjava, točka 3 in opomba 3, je jasno naklonjeno taki uskladitvi.
43 — Commission Recommendation 2005/698/EC of 19 September 2005 on accounting separation and cost accounting systems under the regulatory framework for electronic communications (OJ 2005 L 266, p.
Zdi se, da tudi Skupno stali�če skupine evropskih regulatorjev ERG (05) 29 iz leta 2005 – „Guidelines for implementing the Commission recommendation C(2005) 3480 on Accounting Separation & Cost Accounting Systems under the regulatory framework for electronic communications“ – daje prednost takemu hibridnemu pristopu. 41 – Glej peto uvodno izjavo Priporočila 98/322, ki navaja predvsem ekonomske/tehnične modele od spodaj navzgor, ki postajajo zelo izpopolnjeni, čeprav ostajajo nepopolni.
64) — recital (8), paragraph 3 and footnote (3) — is clearly in favour of such coordination.
V točki 5 istega priporočila je tudi izrecno navedeno, da ti modeli od spodaj navzgor dajejo namig o učinkovitih stro�kih.
ARCOR could prove to be ‘too high’ in relation to the operators’ cost structure.
ARCOR javi s strukturo stro�kov obratovalcev.
44 In such cases, the charges would obviously have to be set, on the basis of the operator’s actual costs, below the figure obtained by applying the theoretical bottomup cost model.
44V tem primeru se bodo cene očitno morale določiti glede na dejanske stro�ke obratovalca, nad vrednostjo, ki izhaja iz uporabe teoretičnega modela stro�kov od spodaj navzgor.
from the notified operator. However, a minimum of evidence for the notified oper -ator’s actual costs will, obviously, be essential to enable the national regulatory authority to ascertain whether the rates satisfy the costorientation requirement.
stro�kih prigla�enega obratovalca očitno nujno potrebno, da bo lahko nacionalni regulativni organ preveril, ali cene upo�tevajo zahtevo po stro�kovni naravnanosti.
The national regulatory authorities therefore have a margin of discretion in determining which statements of the operator’s actual costs are not essential and may be replaced by the use of a bottomup analytical model.
Nacionalni regulativni organi imajo torej diskrecijsko pravico, da določijo, katera dokazila o dejanskih stro�kih obratovalca niso nujno potrebna in se lahko nadomestijo z uporabo analitičnega modela stro�kov od spodaj navzgor.
However, this margin of discretion is subject to limits under the regulation.
Ta diskrecijska pravica ima vseeno omejitve, ki izhajajo iz Uredbe.
Apart from the requirements of transparency, nondiscrimination and objectivity, in exercising this margin of discretion, national regulatory authorities must also respect the limits arising from the interpretation of the concept of cost-orientated charges, with the autonomous significance and objectives already identified.
Pri izvajanju te diskrecijske pravice je treba poleg zahtev po preglednosti, nediskriminaciji in objektivnosti upo�tevati tudi omejitve, ki izhajajo iz razlage pojma stro�kovne naravnanosti cen s samostojnim pomenom in že opredeljenimi cilji.
However, the question posed in the present case is not whether Community law permits the regulatory authorities to use such models.
Vendar pa se v tej zadevi ne postavlja vpra�anje, ali pravo Skupnosti regulativnim organom omogoča uporabo takih modelov.
At issue is whether, where the regulatory authority finds that the statements submitted by the operator concerning the costs allegedly used as a basis for calculating interest imputed and depreciation, are incomplete and do not provide sufficient evidence, it may approve charges based on the alternative of ‘efficient’ costs obtained by applying a bottomup theoretical model based on the cost of investment in building a new local network.
Gre za vpra�anje, ali lahko nacionalni regulativni organ, ko ugotovi – da dokazila, ki jih je predložil obratovalec, o stro�kih, ki naj bi se uporabili kot osnova za izračun računovodskih obresti in odpisov, niso popolna in nimajo potrebne dokazane vrednosti – odobri cene na alternativni podlagi „učinkovitih“ stro�kov, ki izhajajo iz uporabe teoretičnega modela od spodaj navzgor, ki temelji na vrednosti vlaganj v gradnjo novega krajevnega omrežja.
It is, therefore, necessary to determine whether Community law imposes limits on replacing the notified operator’s statements of actual costs by a theoretical model of the costs incurred by an efficient operator and, if so, what those limits are.
Torej je treba ugotoviti, ali pravo Skupnosti nalaga omejitve za nadomestitev dokazil o dejanskih stro�kih prigla�enega obratovalca z uporabo teoretičnega modela stro�kov učinkovitega obratovalca, in če jih, katere so te omejitve.
There is a broad consensus amongst the interveners in this case to the effect that it would not be acceptable for any request for rates approval to be rejected where it is not 100 percent supported by cost statements
Intervenienti v tej zadevi so skoraj soglasni, da zavrnitev vseh zahtevkov za odobritev cen ne bi bila sprejemljiva, če ni stoodstotno utemeljena z dokazili o stro�kih prigla�enega obratovalca. Vendar pa bo minimalno �tevilo dokazil o dejanskih
According to Article 4(2)(b) of the regulation, a national regulatory authority shall have the power to ‘require notified operators to supply information relevant for the implementation of this regulation.’
V skladu s členom 4(2)(b) Uredbe je nacionalni regulativni organ poobla�čen, da lahko „zahteva od prigla�enih obratovalcev, da predložijo informacije, ki so primerne za izvajanje te uredbe“.
This information obviously includes the information needed, within a procedure for the approval of charges for local loop access, to provide evidence that these charges have been set on the basis of costorientation, as provided for in Article 3(3) of the regulation.
Med temi informacijami so predvsem tiste, ki so v postopku odobritve cen dostopa do krajevne zanke potrebne, da se dokaže skladnost cen s stro�kovno naravnanostjo, določeno v členu 3(3) Uredbe.
The regulation does not contain any more precise provisions concerning the cost statements necessary to determine the costs relating to the provision of local loop access in line with which the charges must be orientated.
Uredba ne vsebuje natančnej�ih določb o dokazilih o stro�kih, potrebnih za določitev ustreznih stro�kov zagotavljanja dostopa do krajevne zanke, po katerih se morajo ravnati cene.
44 — Mobistar, cited above, paragraph 35.
44 – Glej zgoraj navedeno sodbo Mobistar, točka 35.
I share Arcor’s view that the Community legislature’s concern to ensure the adoption of cost accounting systems supported by sufficiently detailed documentation would become meaningless if, where the notified operator only provides incomplete statements concerning its cost structure and, in particular, concerning depreciation and interest relating to its local network, the national regulatory authority simply used a theoretical model representing the costs of an efficient virtual operator in order to calculate this depreciation and interest.
46 Glede tega se strinjam z mnenjem družbe Arcor, da bi skrb normodajalca Skupnosti za zagotavljanje sprejetja sistemov stro�kovnega računovodstva, ki temeljijo na dovolj podrobnih dokumentih, postala nepotrebna, če bi nacionalni regulativni organ, ko prigla�eni obratovalec predloži samo nepopolna dokazila o strukturi stro�kov ter zlasti o odpisih in obrestih v zvezi s svojim krajevnim omrežjem, uporabil le teoretični model stro�kov učinkovitega navideznega obratovalca za določitev teh odpisov in obresti.
However, Article 7(2) of Directive 97/33 expressly states that ‘the burden of proof that charges are derived from actual costs, including a reasonable rate of return on investment’ lies with the notified operator.
Vendar je v členu 7(2) Direktive 97/33 izrecno navedeno, da „dokazno breme, da so pristojbine določene glede na stro�ke, vključno s primernim donosom od vlaganj“, nosi prigla�eni obratovalec.
According to Article 7(5), second sentence of that directive, Member States are also required to ensure the adoption of cost accounting systems which are suitable for the implementation inter alia of the costorientation requirements and that they are documented to a sufficient level of detail, as indicated in Annex V. Annex V specifies inter alia the elements which must be included in the published information in order to ensure that the calculation of interconnection charges is transparent.
Države članice morajo v skladu s členom 7(5), drugi stavek, iste direktive zagotavljati sprejetje sistemov stro�kovnega računovodstva, ki so primerni predvsem za izvajanje zahtev po stro�kovni naravnanosti in se opirajo na dovolj podrobne dokumente, kot so navedeni v Prilogi V. V tej prilogi so določeni predvsem elementi, ki morajo biti navedeni v objavljenih informacijah, da se zagotovi preglednost izračuna cen medomrežnega povezovanja.
The principle of costorientation refers first and foremost to the notified operator’s costs, that is to say its actual costs ‘connected with’ the provision of access to the existing local loop owned by that operator.
Načelo stro�kovne naravnanosti se najprej sklicuje na stro�ke priglašenega obratovalca, se pravi na „ustrezne“ dejanske stro�ke zagotavljanja dostopa do obstoječe krajevne zanke, ki je njegova. 47 Da bi preverili združljivost cen s stro�ki prigla�enega
Operators’ cost accounting there- fore plays a central role within the regulatory framework for telecommunications, 45 including, naturally, the legal requirements governing the unbundling of local loop access established by the regulation.
Stro�kovno računovodstvo obratovalcev ima osrednjo vlogo v regulativnem okviru za telekomunikacije 45, seveda vključno z zakonskim sistemom razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke, vzpostavljenim z Uredbo.
The notified operator’s costs for making the local loop available, that is to say those costs which can be identified from its accounting documents, assume a central role when it comes
Ustrezni stro�ki zagotavljanja krajevne zanke s strani prigla�enega obratovalca, se pravi stro�ki, ki se lahko ugotovijo v njegovih računovodskih dokumentih, imajo osrednjo vlogo pri preverjanju stro�kovne naravnanosti cen
46 — Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service’ Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
46 – Direktiva 2002/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah) (UL L 108, str.
51), clearly shows this link between costorientation and the notified operator’s cost accounting system when it states, in Annex VII, paragraph 2, that: ‘[n]ational regulatory authorities are … to ensure … that tariffs for leased lines … follow the basic principles of costorientation.
51) dobro razkriva to povezavo med stro�kovno naravnanostjo in sistemom stro�kovnega računovodstva prigla�enega obratovalca, ko v točki 2 Priloge VII določa: „Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo […] zagotoviti, da so tarife za zakupljene vode […] v skladu z osnovnimi načeli stro�kovne naravnanosti.
To this end, national regulatory authorities are to ensure that undertakings identified as having significant market power … formulate and put in practice a suitable cost accounting system.’
Zato morajo nacionalni regulativni organi zagotoviti, da podjetja, opredeljena kot podjetja z znatno tržno močjo […], izdelajo in v praksi uveljavijo primerni sistem stro�kovnega računovodstva.“
47 — As explained in recital (11) of the regulation.
47 – Kot je pojasnjeno v uvodni izjavi 11 Uredbe.
This obviously also follows from Article 7(2) Directive 97/33 which states that is the undertaking subject to regulation which must bear the burden of proof that charges are derived from actual costs.
Seveda to izhaja tudi iz člena 7(2) Direktive 97/33, v katerem je določeno, da mora podjetje, ki je predmet predpisov, dokazati, da so cene določene glede na dejanske stro�ke.
According to paragraph 2 of Commission Recommendation 98/195/EC of 8 January 1998 on interconnection in a liberalised telecommunications market (Part I — Interconnection pricing) (OJ 1998 L 73, p.
Priporočilo Komisije 98/195/ES z dne 8. januarja 1998 o medomrežnem povezovanju na liberaliziranem telekomunikacijskem trgu (Del 1 – Oblikovanje cen medomrežnega povezovanja, UL L 73, str.
42), adopted on the basis of Article 7(5) of Directive 97/33, ‘[t]he principle of costorientation, when applied to interconnection, means that interconnection charges should reflect the way in which costs of interconnection are actually incurred.’
42), sprejeto na podlagi člena 7(5) Direktive 97/33, v točki 2 določa, da „kadar se načelo stro�kovne naravnanosti uporablja za medomrežno povezovanje, to načelo pomeni, da morajo cene medomrežnega povezovanja odražati, kako so stro�ki medomrežnega povezovanja dejansko nastali“.
45 — See, for example, the Recommendation 98/322 on accounting separation and cost accounting.
45 – Glej na primer Priporočilo 98/322 o ločenem računovodstvu in stro�kovnem računovodstvu. Glej tudi Nihoul, P., in Rodford, P., EU electronic communications law, op. cit., str.
The authors point out that, before the liberalisation of the telecommunications market in Europe, the monopoly operators, being State-owned operators, were not required to use cost accounting systems, precisely because their aim was not to make a profit, but to provide a service.
240 in 241, ki opozarjata, da monopolni obratovalci kot državni obratovalci pred liberalizacijo telekomunikacijskega trga v Evropi niso bili zavezani upo�tevati sistemov stro�kovnega računovodstva, prav zato, ker njihov cilj ni bil ustvariti dobička, ampak ponuditi storitev.
ARCOR taking into account the notified operator’s actual cost structure.
ARCOR stro�kov prigla�enega obratovalca.
Nor would using such a model serve to establish the value of the depreciation and interest currently borne by the notified operator in relation to its existing network, which has already been depreciated (or at least partially) and which is still usable.
Uporaba takega modela se tudi ne bi uporabljala za določitev vrednosti odpisov in obresti, ki jih prigla�eni obratovalec trenutno nosi v zvezi s svojim že (vsaj delno) amortiziranim in �e uporabnim omrežjem.
with the notified operator’s costs, the notified operator’s accounts provide the only possible starting-point for establishing those costs.
obratovalca, lahko kot izhodi�če za njihovo določitev upo�tevamo samo računovodske dokumente prigla�enega obratovalca.
It would be methodologically incorrect to take as the central basis for establishing the notified operator’s costs connected with the provision of access to its network, not its cost statements, but a bottomup analytical model, which provides figures for costs connected with the provision of a modern, efficient local loop to be built from scratch by a virtual efficient operator.
Meto-dolo�ko ne bi bilo pravilno, če kot osrednji temelj za določitev ustreznih stro�kov prigla�enega obratovalca za zagotavljanje dostopa do njegovega omrežja ne bi uporabili dokazil o njegovih stro�kih, ampak bi uporabili predvsem analitični model od spodaj navzgor, ki navaja ustrezne stro�ke zagotavljanja moderne in učinkovite krajevne zanke, ki jo mora znova zgraditi učinkovit navidezni obratovalec.
In fact, the actual costs connected with an existing local loop may be much lower than those calculated using a bottomup theoretical model of that nature.
Dejanski stro�ki obstoječega krajevnega omrežja so lahko namreč precej nižji od stro�kov, izračunanih po takem teoretičnem modelu od spodaj navzgor.
I would also like to emphasise that, where a regulatory authority uses a bottomup theoretical model in place of the statements of depreciation and interest which the notified operator has to bear in relation to its — largely depreciated and still usable — local network, this will encourage that operator to make a strategic selection of the cost statements to be submitted to the regulatory authority, with the result that, the charges will, in the final analysis, be approved either on the basis of actual costs or on the basis of efficient costs, depending on which figure is higher.
Rad bi tudi poudaril, da kadar nacionalni regulativni organ uporabi teoretični model od spodaj navzgor namesto dokazil o odpisih in obrestih, ki jih mora prigla�eni obratovalec nositi v zvezi s svojim že zelo amortiziranim in �e uporabnim krajevnim omrežjem, to spodbuja obratovalca k strate�kemu izbiranju dokazil o stro�kih, ki jih mora predložiti regulativnemu organu, tako da bi bile cene nazadnje odobrene na podlagi dejanskih stro�kov ali na podlagi učinkovitih stro�kov, glede na to, kateri so višji.
The notified operator may decide on its own initiative not to provide certain statements concerning its cost structure, where the application of a ‘bottom up’ analytical cost model is likely to show higher capital costs and, consequently, produce higher access charges.
Prigla�eni obratovalec lahko na svojo pobudo ne predloži nekaterih dokazil o svoji strukturi stro�kov, ko lahko uporaba analitičnega modela stro�kov „bottom-up“ pokaže vi�je stro�ke kapitala in posledično tudi vi�je cene dostopa.
Where the existing local loop is already largely depreciated, even though it still retains a high intrinsic value, to take as the principal basis for calculating imputed interest and depreciation a bottomup theoretical model and not the statements of actual costs, would produce an outcome incompatible with the objectives the principle of costorientation pursues.
Če je obstoječe krajevno omrežje že zelo amortizirano, čeprav �e ohranja visoko notranjo vrednost, bi uporaba teoretičnega modela od spodaj navzgor, ne pa dokazil o dejanskih stro�kih kot bistvene osnove za izračun računovodskih obresti in odpisov, imela posledice, ki bi bile v nasprotju s cilji načela stro�kovne naravnanosti.
The charges approved on the basis of such a model would be higher than those resulting from taking account of the notified operator’s actual cost structure.
Cene, odobrene na podlagi takega modela, bi bile vi�je od cen, ki bi izhajale iz upo�tevanja strukture dejanskih finančnih stro�kov prigla�enega obratovalca.
Consequently, using a bottomup analytical model under those circumstances would not be likely to allow corrections to be made on the basis of efficiency criteria when calculating depreciation and interest based on
Uporaba analitičnega modela od spodaj navzgor v takih okoli�činah torej ne bi prinesla popravkov na podlagi meril učinkovitosti pri izračunu odpisov in obresti, ki izhajajo iz upo�tevanja strukture dejanskih
Admittedly, as I have already mentioned, the national regulatory authority has a margin of discretion with regard to documentation which it does not consider essential.
Nacionalni regulativni organ ima seveda, kot sem že navedel, diskrecijsko pravico glede dokazil, ki se mu ne zdijo nujno potrebna.
However, the exercise of this discretion
Vendar izvajanje te pravice prigla�enim obratovalcem ne sme olaj�ati odločitve, da
the national regulatory authority’s use of a bottomup theoretical cost model in place of the incomplete cost statements supplied by the notified operator in order to calculate that operator’s depreciation and interest, must be regarded as incompatible with the principle of basing charges for local loop access on the notified operator’s costs, where its local network is still operational and is already largely depreciated.
�teti, kot da ni združljivo z načelom stro�kovne naravnanosti cen dostopa do krajevne zanke prigla�enega obratovalca, če je njegovo �e vedno operativno krajevno omrežje že zelo amortizirano. To je na kratko odgovor na četrto postavljeno vpra�anje, ki ga predlagam Sodi�ču.
F — The fifth question
F – Peto vprašanje
Lastly, I consider that the reply to this question is necessarily dependent upon the analyses which the referring court must make in connection with the previous question.
In končno, mislim, da mora biti odgovor na to vpra�anje nujno odvisen od analize, ki jo mora predložitveno sodi�če opraviti v okviru prej�njega vpra�anja.
If, in fact, in the light of the considerations which I have set out above in reply to the previous question, the rates approval decision provides adequate justification for adopting a method for calculating depreciation and interest based on the gross replacement cost of assets, I would, in principle, also consider the regulatory authority’s the use by of a bottomup analytical cost model to be justified. 48
Če namreč odločba o odobritvi cen z vidika ugotovitev, ki sem jih predstavil v odgovoru na prej�nje vpra�anje, ustrezno utemeljuje sprejetje metode izračuna odpisov in obresti, ki temelji na bruto nadomestitvenih stro�kih sredstev, je tudi uporaba analitičnega modela stro�kov od spodaj navzgor s strani istega regulativnega organa praviloma upravičena. 48
This question concerns the boundaries of the margin of discretion which the regulatory authorities are allowed when assessing the costorientation of charges and the parameters of the judicial review to which such decisions must be subjected.
To vpra�anje zadeva omejitev diskrecijske pravice nacionalnih regulativnih organov pri preučevanju stro�kovne naravnanosti cen in omejitev sodnega nadzora teh odločitev.
However, where the adoption of a method of calculating depreciation and interest based on the gross replacement cost of assets proves not to be justified,
Nasprotno pa, kadar se sprejetje metode izračuna odpisov in obresti, ki temelji na bruto nadomestitvenih stro�kih sredstev, ne izkaže za upravičeno, je treba dejstvo, da nacionalni regulativni organ nadomesti nepopolna dokazila o stro�kih prigla�enega obratovalca z uporabo teoretičnega modela stro�kov od spodaj navzgor za izračun odpisov in obresti prigla�enega obratovalca,
Article 4(1) of the regulation states that the national regulatory authorities are to ensure that charging for unbundled access to the local loop fosters fair and sustainable competition.
V členu 4(1) Uredbe je določeno, da nacionalni regulativni organi zagotavljajo, da se z zaračunavanjem razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke pospe�uje po�tena in znosna konkurenca.
Consequently, Article 4(2) provides that they are to have the power to impose changes, inter alia in the prices charged by notified operators for unbundled
Ta člen tako v drugem odstavku določa, da so ti organi poobla�čeni, da zahtevajo spremembe, zlasti za cene, ki jih prigla�eni obratovalci zaračunavajo za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke. 49 Taka sprememba