natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Unlike the Commission, I think that the explanations provided by the Federal Republic of Germany in that regard are convincing.
V nasprotju s Komisijo menim, da so pojasnila, ki jih je v zvezi s tem predložila Zvezna republika Nemčija, prepričljiva.
I base my view on the following three considerations.
Moje stali�če temelji na naslednjih treh ugotovitvah.
It should be noted in that regard that the work of a pharmacist does not consist solely in distributing medicinal products.
Glede tega je treba poudariti, da poklic lekarnarja ne pomeni le distribucije zdravil.
Under the provisions of Article 45 of Dir -ective 2005/36, which repeated Article 2 of Council Directive 85/432/EEC, 30it also includes the provision of information and advice on medicinal products.
V skladu z določbami člena 45 Direktive 2005/36, v kateri je povzet člen 2 Direktive Sveta 85/432/EGS, 30 vključuje ta poklic tudi dajanje informacij in svetovanje o zdravilih.
First, it is for the Member States, within the limits imposed by the Treaty, to decide what degree of protection of public health they wish to ensure. 29
Prvič, v okviru omejitev, ki jih določa Pogodba, morajo države članice same odločiti, na kak�ni ravni želijo zagotoviti varstvo javnega zdravja. 29
Therefore, even though, as the Commission observes, it is the doctor who assumes responsibility in individual cases for the use of the medicinal products he has prescribed, it is still the case that the pharmacist has a competence of his own, namely to give information and advice. On that basis he is required to provide appropriate advice for the proper use of those medicinal products and must, where necessary, point out any error in the prescription.
Zato mora biti, kot navaja Komisija, čeprav zdravnik v vsakem konkretnem primeru prevzame odgovornost za uporabo zdravil, ki jih predpi�e, lekarnar kljub temu pristojen za seznanjanje in svetovanje, ki mu omogoča ustrezno svetovati v zvezi s pravilno uporabo teh zdravil in po potrebi opozoriti na napačen zdravni�ki recept.
That particular competence of pharmacists provides justification for the monopoly in the distribution of medicinal products to the public which they enjoy in several Member States.
Ta pristojnost lekarnarjev upravičuje monopol nad distribucijo zdravil javnosti, ki jo priznavajo �tevilne države članice.
28 — Ibid., paragraph 50.
28 – Ibidem (točka 50).
30 — Directive of 16 September 1985 concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of certain activities in the field of pharmacy (OJ 1985 L 253, p. 34).
30 – Direktiva z dne 16. septembra 1985 o uskladitvi zakonov in drugih predpisov v zvezi z nekaterimi dejavnostmi na področju farmacije (UL L 253, str. 34).
29 — Deutscher Apothekerverband, paragraph 103 and caselaw cited.
29 – Zgoraj navedena sodba Deutscher Apothekerverband (točka 103 in navedena sodna praksa).
A Member State is entitled, in the exercise of its sovereign powers in the field of public health, to decide that such advice and supervision on the part of a pharmacist must also be assured for all hospital patients, irrespective of the type of hospital and its specialisations.
Država članica ima v okviru suverene oblasti na področju javnega zdravja pravico odločiti, da morajo, neodvisno od vrste ustanove gre in tega, za kaj je specializirana, od lekarnarjevih nasvetov in nadzora imeti korist tudi hospitalizirane osebe.
Unlike the Commission, I consider that the situation is not comparable to that of distributing medicinal products to the public.
Nasprotno od Komisije namreč menim, da ta položaj ni primerljiv z distribucijo zdravil javnosti.
In the latter situation, a patient who has been prescribed treatment by his doctor and who then goes to his pharmacist is in a position to understand and put into practice the advice the pharmacist gives him.
V zadnjem primeru bolnik, kateremu je zdravnik predpisal zdravljenje in ki se nato obrne na lekarnarja, lahko razume in uresniči njegove nasvete.
On the other hand, in a hospital, medicinal products are administered by the nursing staff and the patient is most often in a completely passive situation.
Nasprotno v bolni�nici zdravila predpisuje lečeče osebje in bolnik je najpogosteje v popolnoma pasivnem položaju.
The way in which this assurance is provided clearly varies according to the size of each hospital and its specialisations.
Vsekakor je uresničevanje tega jamstva odvisno od velikosti vsake posamezne ustanove in od njene specializacije.
It may be assumed that it is provided to a lesser extent in a hospital specialising in geriatric medicine, caring for elderly people whose needs for medicinal products are stable and well known to the medical staff, than in a hospital specialising in cardiovascular surgery or dealing with medical emergencies.
Lahko se predpostavlja, da je to jamstvo manj�e v bolni�nici, specializirani za geriatrijo, ki sprejema starostnike s stalnimi potrebami po zdravilih, ki so zdravni�kemu osebju dobro poznane, kot v centru, specializiranem za kardiovaskularno kirurgijo, ali takem, ki obravnava vse nujne primere.
Consequently, in order for the pharmacist to carry out this duty to give advice and supervise the proper use of medicinal products in a hospital environment effectively, he must be able to familiarise himself with each patient’s situation.
Zato učinkovito uresničevanje obveznosti svetovanja in nadzora lekarnarja v zvezi s pravilno uporabo zdravil v bolni�nici zahteva, da ta tudi sam spozna stanje vsakega bolnika.
The pharmacist, as the Federal Republic of Germany contends, must form an integral part of the treatment team.
Kot trdi Zvezna republika Nemčija, mora biti lekarnar sestavni del terapevtske ekipe.
Otherwise, if intervention by the pharmacist were to be limited to providing advice over the telephone, his role would be restricted merely to cases in which a hospital doctor or a member of the nursing team had doubts about the use of a medicinal product.
Če bi se moralo posredovanje lekarnarja omejiti na telefonsko svetovanje, bi bila njegova vloga omejena le na primere, ko bi se zdravnik v bolni�nici ali član lečečega osebja zna�el v dvomih glede uporabe zdravila.
If an external pharmacist is to carry out this duty of providing advice and supervision, he must therefore be present at the hospital
Izvajanje te obveznosti zunanjega lekarnarja v zvezi s svetovanjem in nadzorom torej zahteva njegovo redno fizično prisotnost v
However, in all situations I am of the view that the effective way of carrying out this duty of giving advice and supervising the proper use of medicinal products requires the pharmacist to go to the hospital in person on a regular basis and according to a schedule worked out for each hospital.
Vendar menim, da v vsakem primeru učinkovito uresničevanje te naloge svetovanja in nadzora pravilne uporabe zdravil lekarnarja obvezuje, da je v zadevni ustanovi redno in tako pogosto fizično prisoten, kot se to določi glede na funkcijo posamezne ustanove.
The logical assumption therefore is that he carries on his business in the vicinity of the hospital, since, as the Commission points out, he must also be present in his dispensary in order to be able to attend to the public.
Logično iz tega sledi, da izvaja dejavnosti v bližini bolni�nice, ker mora biti, kot navaja Komisija, prisoten tudi v lekarni, kjer je na voljo javnosti.
The Commission does not dispute that in order to select its medicinal products a hospital needs the help of a pharmacist with a detailed knowledge of what that hospital requires.
Komisija ne zanika, da bolni�nica pri izbiri zdravil potrebuje pomoč lekarnarja, ki v celoti pozna potrebe bolni�nice.
It is therefore the pharmacist whose job it is to provide advice on the use of medicinal products within the hospital who would appear to be the best person to be aware of precisely what the hospital’s needs are and to take part in the process of selecting medicinal products.
Torej naj bi le lekarnar, ki je zadolžen za svetovanje o uporabi zdravil v ustanovi, najbolje poznal njene potrebe in sodeloval pri izbiri zdravil.
Second, the Federal Republic of Germany is correct, in my view, in arguing that it is difficult to separate the selection of medicinal products from the provision of advice to hospital staff.
Drugič, po mojem mnenju ima Zvezna republika Nemčija prav, ko trdi, da so dejavnosti izbiranja zdravil in svetovanja bolni� -ničnemu osebju težko razdružljive.
Third, I share the Republic of Ger -many’s opinion that the functions of supply- ing medicinal products and checking a hos -pital’s stocks of medicinal products, on the one hand, and those of advising hospital staff and selecting medicinal products, on the other hand, cannot be separated either.
Tretjič, strinjam se z mnenjem Zvezne republike Nemčije o tem, da so tako dejavnosti oskrbe z zdravili in nadzora zalog zdravil v bolni�nici kot dejavnosti svetovanja bolni�ničnemu osebju in izbire zdravil prav tako nerazdružljive.
I base my view on two complementary reasons, the first functional and the second economic.
To stali�če utemeljujem na dveh dopolnjujočih se razlogih, prvi je funkcionalni, drugi gospodarski.
The list of medicinal products authorised in a Member State is much more extensive than the list of medicinal products that a hospital actually needs.
Pravzaprav je seznam zdravil, ki so odobrena v določeni državi članici, veliko dalj�i kot seznam zdravil, ki jih bolni�nica resnično potrebuje.
A hospital’s needs are limited to the diseases it is called upon to treat.
Potrebe bolni�nice so omejene na patologije, ki jih zdravi.
Moreover, a large number of medicinal products have identical or comparable properties.
Poleg tega imajo �tevilna zdravila podobne ali primerljive lastnosti.
Consequently, any hospital, for the sake of good management, must select the medicinal products needed for its areas of specialisation and avoid unnecessary ordering of a number of medicinal products having the same properties.
Zato mora vsaka bolni� -nica, da bi dobro poslovala, izbirati zdravila, ki so potrebna za njena področja pristojnosti, in se izogibati nepotrebnim naročilom več zdravil, ki imajo iste lastnosti.
At the functional level, I share the view of the Federal Republic of Germany that the pharmacist who would appear to be the best placed to provide advice in order to ensure the proper use of medicinal products and supervise that use is the one who has supplied or dispensed them.
S funkcionalnega vidika enako kot Zvezna republika Nemčija menim, da lahko lekarnar, ki zdravila dobavi ali jih pripravi, najbolje svetuje v zvezi s pravilno uporabo zdravil in jo najbolje nadzira.
COMMISSION v GERMANY best placed to carry out regular checks on the quality and storage of such products.
KOMISIJA PROTI NEMČIJI za izvajanje rednih nadzorov kakovosti in shranjevanja zdravil.
Similarly, the external pharmacist who would appear to be the best placed to supply a hospital with all the necessary medicin- al products and to keep in his dispens- ary adequate stocks to meet the hospital’s needs in all circumstances would appear to be the person who provides advice to the medical staff and takes part in the process of selecting medicinal products, since he is well acquainted with the needs of the hospital to be supplied.
Zunanji lekarnar, ki je najprimernej�i za dobavo vseh potrebnih zdravil bolni�nici in za sestavljanje zalog v svoji lekarni, ki bi pokrile njene potrebe v vseh okoli�činah, je tisti, ki svetuje zdravni�kemu osebju in sodeluje pri izbiri zdravil, saj v celoti pozna potrebe bolni�nice, ki jo oskrbuje.
As the Federal Republic of Germany states, there is a synergy between supplying medicinal products, advising hospital staff and checking stocks.
Kot navaja Zvezna republika Nemčija, obstaja sinergija med dejavnostmi oskrbe, svetovanja in nadzora.
Like the Federal Republic of Germany, I am of the view that those different functions are complementary and that, from the functional point of view, it is more rational to assign them to the same professional.
Enako kot Zvezna republika Nemčija menim, da se te različne dejavnosti medsebojno dopolnjujejo in da je s funkcionalnega vidika bolj razumno, da se zaupajo istemu strokovnjaku.
At the economic level, it is important to take into consideration the fact that the activity of providing advice forms an integral part of the pharmacist’s job when he issues a medicinal product to a patient.
Z gospodarskega vidika je pomembno upo�tevati dejstvo, da je svetovalna dejavnost ob izdaji zdravila bolnikom sestavni del lekarnarjevega poklica.
It does not involve additional payment.
Ne zahteva dodatnega plačila.
This view also applies as regards the function of checking a hospital’s stocks of medicinal products.
Ta analiza velja tudi za nadzorovanje zalog zdravil v bolni�nici.
As the Federal Republic of Germany explains, a hospital which takes the decision to obtain its supplies from an external pharmacy does so primarily in order to free itself of the burden of having to stock large quantities of medicinal products on its own premises.
Kot trdi Zvezna republika Nemčija, se želi bolni�nica, ki se odloči zaupati oskrbo zunanji lekarni, re�iti nuje, da hrani velike zaloge zdravil v svojih prostorih.
It is therefore the external pharmacy which has to have sufficient stocks of medicinal products to be able to meet the needs of that hospital in all circumstances.
Tako mora zunanja lekarna imeti zadostne zaloge zdravil, da lahko v vseh okoli�činah pokrije potrebe bolni�nice.
Consequently, it is that pharmacy which is
Zato je prav ta lekarna v najbolj�em položaju
Where a hospital takes the decision to obtain all its supplies of medicinal products from an external pharmacy, the staff of that pharmacy must undertake the task of providing advice within that hospital, including in emergencies, with the availability constraints which that involves, and the other tasks of selecting medicinal products and checking stocks of medicinal products within the dispensary and at the hos -pital, because those tasks may be regarded as forming an integral part of the service of supplying medicinal products.
Ko se bolni�nica odloči zaupati celotno oskrbo z zdravili zunanji lekarni, mora osebje te lekarne v bolni�nici prevzeti svetovalno vlogo, in to tudi v nujnih primerih, vključno s tem, da mora biti na voljo, pa tudi druge naloge v zvezi z izbiro zdravil in nadzorom zalog zdravil v lekarni in bolni�nici, ker so te del storitev dobave zdravil.
They should not therefore give rise to any special payment.
Torej se zanje ne zahteva posebno plačilo.
However, it is difficult to see how this could be done if the external pharmacist responsible for carrying out those additional tasks were not the one supplying the hospital with all its medicinal products.
Nasprotno težko razumem, kako bi bilo, če zunanji lekarnar, ki je zadolžen za te dodatne naloge, ni tisti, ki zagotavlja celotno oskrbo bolni�nice z zdravili.
It has acknowledged in that regard that a Member State must be able to plan the number of hospitals, their geographical distribution, the way in which they are organised and the facilities with which they are equipped, and also the nature of the medical services which they are able to offer.
Glede tega je priznalo, da mora država članica načrtovati �tevilo bolni�ničnih ustanov, njihovo geografsko razmestitev, ureditev in razpoložljivo opremo, pa tudi vrste zdravni�kih storitev, ki jih ponujajo.
Such planning, as a general rule, ensures that there is sufficient and permanent access to a balanced range of highquality hospital treatment in the Member State concerned.
Tak�no načrtovanje na splo�no omogoča zagotavljanje zadostnega in stalnega dostopa do uravnotežene in kakovostne bolni�nične oskrbe na ozemlju zadevne države članice.
It also assists in controlling costs and preventing, as far as possible, any wastage of financial, technical and human resources. 34
Prav tako pelje do bolj�ega obvladovanja stro�kov in se kar najbolj izogiba vsakr�nemu razsipavanju finančnih, tehničnih in člove�kih virov. 34
In reality the hospital concerned would be forced to employ a pharmacist to carry out these tasks specially, which, because of the additional charges inherent in such recruitment, would offset to a great extent the advantage of using an external pharmacist.
Pravzaprav bi bila zadevna bolni�nica prisiljena zaposliti lekarnarja, ki bi posebej opravljal te naloge, kar bi zaradi dodatnih stro�kov tega delovnega mesta znatno zmanj�alo privlačnost možnosti, da se bolni�nica obrne na zunanjega lekarnarja.
Such wastage, in the view of the Court, would be all the more damaging because it is generally recognised that the hospital care sector generates considerable costs and must satisfy increasing needs, while the financial resources which may be made available for healthcare are not unlimited, whatever the mode of funding applied. 35
Tako zapravljanje naj bi bilo po mnenju Sodi�ča �e toliko bolj �kodljivo, ker sektor bolni�nične oskrbe nesporno povzroča velike stro�ke in mora zadovoljevati vedno večje potrebe, medtem ko finančna sredstva, ki se namenjajo zdravstveni oskrbi, pa naj gre za kateri koli način financiranja, niso neomejena. 35
Of course, in principle, aims of a purely economic nature cannot justify a barrier to the fundamental principle of the free movement of goods.
Seveda izključno gospodarski cilji načeloma ne morejo utemeljiti ovir pri temeljnem načelu prostega pretoka blaga.
31However, in the field of public health the Court has accepted that derogations from that principle may be allowed where interests of an economic nature concern maintaining a balanced medical and hospital service open to all, 32in particular the maintenance of treatment capacity or medical competence on national territory. 33
31Vendar je Sodi�če na področju javnega zdravja dopustilo, da se lahko odstopi od tega načela, ko gre pri gospodarskih interesih za to, da se v bolni�nici obdrži uravnotežena in vsem dostopna zdravni�ka služba, 32posebno če gre za zmogljivosti oskrbe ali zdravni�ko strokovnost na nacionalnem ozemlju. 33
I am of the view that those considerations may be applied to the present case and that the Federal Republic of Germany was right to state that supplying a hospital with medicinal products could not be separated
Menim, da se te ugotovitve lahko prenesejo na ta primer in da je Zvezna republika Nemčija lahko utemeljeno predvidela, da je oskrba bolni�nice z zdravili nerazdružljiva z drugimi nalogami svetovanja bolni�ničnemu
31 — Case C-120/95 Decker [1998] ECR I-1831, paragraph 39.
31 – Sodba z dne 28. aprila 1998 v zadevi Decker (C-120/95, Recueil, str.
32 — Case C-444/05 Stamatelaki [2007] ECR I-3185, paragraph 31 and caselaw cited.
32 – Sodba z dne 19. aprila 2007 v zadevi Stamatelaki (C-444/05, ZOdl., str.
COMMISSION v GERMANY number of Member States medicinal products are supplied to hospitals exclusively by internal pharmacies confirms this view.
KOMISIJA PROTI NEMČIJI da v �tevilnih državah članicah bolni�nico z zdravili oskrbuje izključno interna lekarna, prav tako potrjuje to analizo.
from the other tasks of advising hospital staff, selecting medicinal products and checking the hospital’s stocks of medicinal products in order to ensure a high level of protection for public health while maintaining a rational supply of healthcare.
osebju, izbire zdravil in nadzora nad zalogami zdravil v bolni�nici, da se lahko zagotovi visoka raven varstva javnega zdravja, hkrati pa �e naprej vzdržuje racionalizirana ponudba bolni�nične oskrbe.
Against this, the Commission also argues that it does not object to a hospital being able to make such requirements.
Komisija v nasprotju z omenjeno analizo trdi, da ne nasprotuje temu, da bi bolni�nica lahko predpisala tak�ne pogoje.
It considers, however, that hospitals should be able to decide themselves whether to assign to a single pharmacy provision of normal supplies, provision of emergency supplies, checks on stocks of medicinal products and provision of advice for hospital staff.
Vendar meni, da bi bolni�nice morale imeti možnost same odločiti, ali želijo zaupati osnovno oskrbo, nujno oskrbo, nadziranje zalog zdravil in svetovanje bolni�ničnemu osebju eni sami lekarni.
Moreover, I find nothing in the documents before the Court to suggest that the contested requirements constitute a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between Member States, within the meaning of the second sentence of Article 30 EC, as interpreted in Henn and Darby.
Poleg tega v spisu ne najdem nobenega elementa, na podlagi katerega bi lahko domneval, da so sporni pogoji sredstvo samovoljne diskriminacije ali prikrito omejevanje trgovine med državami članicami v smislu druge povedi člena 30 ES, kot je bila razložena v sodbi z dne 14. decembra 1979 v zadevi Henn in Darby.
36It does not appear that the public health ground relied on to justify the contested requirements has been diverted from its purpose and used in such a way as to discriminate against goods originating in other Member States or indirectly to protect certain national products.
36 Ne zdi se namreč, da bi bil razlog javnega zdravja, naveden z namenom, da utemelji sporne pogoje, zlorabljen in uporabljen tako, da bi diskriminatorno učinkoval na blago iz drugih držav članic ali da bi posredno za�čitil določene domače proizvode.
I do not share that point of view.
S tem stali�čem se ne strinjam.
As I said above, a Member State is entitled to determine the level of health protection it intends to provide in its territory.
Kot sem povedal, ima država članica pravico opredeliti stopnjo varovanja zdravja, ki ga ima namen zagotavljati na svojem ozemlju.
The Federal Republic of Germany is therefore entitled to require that the same level of protection is ensured in all hospitals.
Zvezna republika Nemčija ima torej pravico zahtevati, da je v vseh bolni�nicah zagotov -ljena enaka stopnja varstva.
Hence, the requirement for a single supplier to take on all the aspects of supplying medicinal products to a hospital and the requirement of geographical proximity stemming from this are, in my view, justified on the ground of protection of public health.
Zato je zahteva, da mora vse sestavine oskrbe bolni�nice z zdravili prevzeti en sam dobavitelj in da se posledično zahteva geografska bližina, po mojem mnenju utemeljena z varstvom javnega zdravja.
It also seems to me that the fact that in a
Dejstvo,
I therefore propose that the Court should dismiss the Commission’s action for failure to fulfil obligations as unfounded and order the Commission to pay the costs, under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure.
Zato Sodi�ču predlagam, da tožbo Komisije zavrne kot neutemeljeno in da se v skladu s členom 69(2) Poslovnika Komisiji naloži plačilo stro�kov.
In view of the foregoing considerations, I propose that the Court should dismiss the present action for failure to fulfil obligations as unfounded and order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.
Na podlagi prej�njih ugotovitev Sodi�ču predlagam, da se ta tožba zavrne kot neutemeljena in da se Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti naloži plačilo stro�kov.
11 September 2008 *
SODBA SODIŠČA (četrti senat) z dne 11. septembra 2008 *
In Case C-141/07,
V zadevi C-141/07, zaradi tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti na podlagi člena 226 ES, vložene 9. marca 2007,
ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 9 March 2007,
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti, ki jo zastopa B.
Commission of the European Communities, represented by B. Schima, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg, applicant, v
Schima, zastopnik, z naslovom za vročanje v Luxembourgu, tožeča stranka, proti
2008 — CASE C-141/07
2008 – ZADEVA C-141/07
Advocate General: Y. Bot, Registrar: R. Grass, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 10 April 2008, gives the following
Grass, po predstavitvi sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca na obravnavi 10. aprila 2008 izreka naslednjo