natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As far as the risk of disappearance of assets and consequently the impossibility of recovery is concerned, the burden of proof will generally fall on the injured party, that is to say the Commission (78).
Glede tveganja izginotja sredstev in torej n e z m o Š n o s t i njihove ponovne pridobitve je do-kazno breme praviloma na oùkodovancu, torej Komisiji(78).
In this respect, it will always be in the interest of the Commission to submit an application with as much detail as possible.
V njenem interesu je torej, da vedno p r e d l o Š i kolikor se da podrobno zahtevo.
Finally, it should be noted that an equivalent of precautionary measures may be found in certain Member States who have
Treba je tudi opozoriti, da v nekaterih d r Š a v a h ┘lanicah, ki imajo sistem obi┘ajnega prava, obstajajo enakovredni preventivni
In 2002, the total arrears of recoverable amounts relating to irregularities in the EAGGF Guarantee Section were estimated at EUR 2.2 billion, according to data provided by Member States under Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 (81).
Na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih v skladu s ┘lenoma 3 in 5 Uredbe (EGS) ùt. 595/91(81) spo-ro┘ile d r Š a v e ┘lanice, je bilo leta 2002 ocenjeno, da v zvezi z nepravilnostmi v sektorju
In its communication of December 2002 (82), the main aim of which was to improve recovery, the Commission decided to set up a Recovery Task Force (RTF) made up of officials from OLAF and the Agriculture and Rural Development DG.
Komisija je v svojem sporo┘ilu iz decembra 2002(82), katerega namen je bilo izboljùanje postopka izterjave, sklenila ustanoviti ‡projektno skupino za izterjavoƒ (TFR « Task Force Recouvrement), sestavljeno iz u s l u Š b e n c e v OLAF in GD za kmetijstvo.
The Recovery Task Force was charged with clari-fying the situation of unrecovered debt and drawing up decisions on financial liability under the formal clearance procedure in the EAGGF Guarantee Section.
Naloga TFR je bila pojasniti p o l o Š a j neizterjave in pripraviti odlo┘itve o finan┘ni odgovor-nosti v okviru formalnega postopka potrjevanja obra┘unov na podro┘ju Jamstvenega od-delka EKUJS.
It started its audit work in 2003 for unrecovered amounts dating from before 1999 exceeding EUR 500 000 each.
Revizijo je za┘ela leta 2003 za primere, ki pred letom 1999 niso bili izterjani in ki posamezno presegajo 500 000 EUR.
This exercise, involving nine Member States, revealed that the total amount of unre-covered debt was EUR 765 million (83).
Na podlagi te revizije, v katero je bilo vklju┘enih devet d r Š a v ┘lanic, se je izkazalo, da je skupna vsota neizterjanih zneskov znaùala 765 mili-jonov EUR(83).
At the end of 2004, the clearance procedure was initiated by the Agriculture and Rural Development DG; formal letters under Article 8 of
GD za kmetijstvo je konec leta 2004 lahko za┘el postopek potrjevanja ob-ra┘unov: v skladu s ┘lenom 8 Uredbe (ES) ùt.
Belgium, Czech Republic, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Latvia, Hungary, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia, Finland, Sweden.Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Avstrija, Belgija, ﾚeùka, Gr┘ija, Ùpanija, Finska, Francija, M a d Š a r s k a , Italija, Latvija, Portugalska, Ùvedska, Slovenija.ﾚeùka in Slovaùka.
In the pre-trial proceedings, the prosecutor may secure the claim even without application by the injured if the protection of the latter's interest calls for it and, in particular, if there is a danger of omission.Belgium, Greece, Italy, Austria.Finland is the only reported exception to this rule: application for a precautionary measure such as a transfer prohibi-tion or seizure will not require any evidence of that risk.
V predhodnem postopku lahko t o Š i l s t v op r e d l o Š i zahtevo tudi brez proùnje oùkodovanca, ┘e je v interesu slednjega in zlasti ┘e z njegove strani obstaja tveganje opustitve.Avstrija, Belgija, Gr┘ija, Italija.Samo Finska je opozorila na odstopanje od tega na┘ela: uporaba preventivnega ukrepa, kot sta prepoved odtujitve ali zaseg, ne zahteva dokaza o tveganju.
In principle, it is enough to claim that the risk is rather likely.
Na┘eloma zadostuje, da se v zahtevi navede, da je tveganje zelo verjetno.
However, the application should describe how the risk is manifesting itself in the case in question.England and Wales.Scotland.OJ L 67, 14.3.1991.COM(2002) 671 final.This amount does not include 32 cases communicated before 1999 for an amount exceeding EUR 500 000, which revealed inconsistencies when the communications were compared with the results of the audit.
Vendar pa mora biti v zahtevi opisano, kako se tveganje k a Š e v zadevnem primeru.Anglija in Wales.Ùkotska.UL L 67, 14.3.1991.COM(2002) 671 kon┘.Ta vsota ne vklju┘uje 32 primerov, ki so bili sporo┘eni pred letom 1999 in katerih znesek je presegal 500 000 EUR, glede katerih pa so bile ob primerjanju sporo┘il z rezultati revizije za b e l e Š e n e nedoslednosti.
Priority will be given to dealing with these cases in 2005.
Ti primeri bodo pri ob-ravnavi v letu 2005 imeli prednost.
Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 on financial liability were sent to the nine Member States in question with the financial corrections proposed by the Commission.
2 9 upravlja OLAF, vsebuje vsa sporo┘ila, ki jih d r Š a v e ┘lanice poùljejo v okviru ┘lenov 3 in 5 Uredbe (EGS) ùt.
The Exter-nal Communications Registry database, managed by OLAF, contains all the communi-cations sent by the Member States under Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 on irregularities relating to the EAGGF Guarantee Section.
595/91 o nepravilnostih v zvezi z Jamstvenim oddelkom EKUJS.
The Member States were asked to verify and complete these data, fill in an electronic self-assessment form on the results of the recovery measures, and submit a proposal on dealing with unrecov-ered amounts.
D r Š a v e ┘lanice so bile pozvane, da preverijo in dopolnijo te podatke, izpolnijo elektronski obrazec za samooceno rezultatov ukrepov za izterjavo in oblikujejo predlog za prevzem neizterja-nih zneskov.
The RTF will verify the data sent in 2005; the formal clearance proce-dure will begin after completion of the verifications and any necessary supplementary audits.
TFR bo preverila podatke, poslane v letu 2005, formalni postopek potrjevanja obra┘unov pa se bo lahko pri┘el po zaklju┘ku preverjanj in morebitnih dodatnih revizij.
The RTF's work has resulted in better use of the data communicated by the Member States in line with the Commission's undertaking to `improve the quality of the available data relating to irregular payments under the CAP' in its response to the Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2004 (84).
Ta rezultat je skladen s prizadevanjem ‡za izboljùanje kakovosti r a z p o l o Š l j i v i h podatkov v zvezi z nered-nimi pla┘ili v okviru skupne kmetijske politikeƒ, za kar se je Komisija zavezala v svojih odgovorih na posebno poro┘ilo ùt. 3/2004 Ra┘unskega sodiù┘a(84).
In the area of the Structural Funds, the recovery of unduly paid amounts due to irregular-ity or fraud is carried out by Member States.
Izterjavo nepravilno pla┘anih zneskov zaradi napake ali goljufije na podro┘ju strukturnih skladov zagotavljajo d r Š a v e ┘lanice.
The recovery of those amounts at Commu-nity level can be done by reduction or cancellation of the financial contribution with the possibility of a transfer of funds to other operations when the programme concerned has not yet been closed.
Povra┘ilo teh zneskov Komisiji se lahko izvede z zmanjùanjem ali ukinitvijo finan┘ne u d e l e Š b e z m o Š n o s t j o prerazporeditve sredstev na druge operacije, ┘e se zadevni program ùe ni zaklju┘il.
The programmes co-financed by the Structural Funds are multiannual and based on interim payments.
Programi, ki so sofinancirani iz strukturnih skladov, so ve┘letni in delujejo na podlagi vmesnih pla┘il.
Recovery of amounts unduly paid may take place before or after conclusion of the programme.
Izterjava nepravilno pla┘anih zneskov se lahko izvede pred ali po zaklju┘ku programa.
For the 1994«99 programming period, the deadline for presentation of the request for final payment to the Commission was 31 March 2003.
Za programsko obdobje 1994«1999 je bil rok za p r e d l o Š i t e v zahtevka za kon┘no pla┘ilo Komisiji 31. marec 2003.
In that period, about 1 000 programmes were co-financed by the Community for a total of around EUR 159 billion (85).
V tem obdobju je Skupnost sofinancirala p r i b l i Š n o 1 000 programov v skupnem znesku okoli 159 milijard EUR(85).
The Commission's authorising and managing de-partments (Regional Policy DG, Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG, Agriculture and Rural Development DG, Fisheries and Maritime Affairs DG), assisted by the European Anti-Fraud Office, are responsible for administrative and financial follow-up once these programmes have been concluded.
S l u Š b e Komisije, ki delujejo kot odredbodajalci in organi upravljanja (GD za regionalno politiko, GD za zaposlovanje, so-cialne zadeve in enake m o Š n o s t i , GD za kmetijstvo in razvoj p o d e Š e l j a , GD za ribiùtvo in pomorske zadeve), s pomo┘jo OLAF zagotavljajo upravno in finan┘no spremljanje za za-klju┘itev teh programov.
This follow-up is based in particular on the communications, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1681/94 (86), of irregularities by Member States that have been recorded in the External Communications Registry database.
To spremljanje temelji zlasti na sporo┘ilih o nepravilnostih, ki jih d r Š a v e ┘lanice zagotavljajo na podlagi Uredbe (ES) ùt. 1681/94(86) in se b e l e Š i j o v poda-tkovno bazo ECR (register za zunanja sporo┘ila).
In the period in question, the Member States communicated cases of irregularities involv-ing an amount of approximately EUR 1 370 million (87) affected as Community contribu- t i on .
Za zadevno obdobje so d r Š a v e ┘lanice sporo┘ile primere nepravilnosti v znesku 1 370 mili-jonov EUR(87), ki je bil dodeljen kot prispevek Skupnosti.
This figure does not include projects directly financed under the Structural Funds and projects co-financed under the Cohesion Funds.OJ L 178, 12.7.1994.Situation according to the data contained in the ECR database of 18.4.2005.
Ta podatek ne vklju┘uje neposrednih projektov, financiranih v okviru strukturnih skladov, pa tudi ne projektov, sofinanciranih iz Kohezijskega sklada.UL L 178, 12.7.1994.Stanje na podlagi podatkov iz baze ECR na dan 18.4.2005.
Protection of the financial interests of the C o m m u n i t i e s Fight against fraud
Zaþｲita finanｲnih interesov Skupnosti Boj proti goljufijam
Annual report 2004
Letno poroｲilo 2004
Annual report 2005 from the Commissionon the protection of the European Communities’ nancial interests
Letno poročilo 2005Poročilo Komisije o zaščiti nančnihinteresov Skupnosti
Fight against fraud
Boj proti goljujam
Europe Direct is a service to help you nd answers to your questionsabout the European Union
Europe Direct je služba za pomoč pri iskanju odgovorovna vprašanja v zvezi z Evropsko unijo
Foreword is annual report on the protection of the nancial interests and the ght against fraud, jointly produced by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Community, shows what has been achieved in this area both in 2005 and over the last few years.
To letno poročilo o zaščiti nančnih interesov in boju proti goljufijam, ki ju skupaj izvajajo Komisija in države članice Evropske skupnosti, prikazuje razvoj na tem področju tako v letu 2005 kot v preteklih nekaj letih.
ere has been significant substantial progress. e main message is that we have a reliable system at Community level to control irregularities and fraud and, wherever possible, prevent them from occurring.
Dosežen je bil znaten napredek. Poglavitno je dejstvo, da na ravni Skupnosti obstaja zanesljiv sistem za nadzor nepravilnosti in goljufij ter njihovo preprečevanje, kadar je to mogoče.
When they do take place, however, they will be vigorously dealt with. is is an important nding and it is worth underlining in the wider context of a debate on the successes of the European Community.
Če pa do njih vendarle pride, so predmet resne obravnave. To je pomembna ugotovitev, ki si zasluži omembo v širšem okviru razprave o uspehih Evropske skupnosti.
In its day-to-day business, the Commission and OLAF rely heavily on cooperation provided by the different administrations, including anti-fraud, investigation and judicial services both in Member States and third countries.
V svojih vsakodnevnih opravilih sta Komisija in OLAF v precejšnji meri odvisna od sodelovanja različnih upravnih služb, vključno s službami za boj proti goljufijam, preiskovalnimi in pravosodnimi službami tako v državah članicah kot v tretjih državah.
More and more fraudsters operate at an international level.
Čedalje več goljufov deluje na mednarodni ravni.
Cooperation, mutual assistance and exchanges of information are therefore in our common interest in order to constantly enhance the protection of European taxpayers’ money.
Sodelovanje, vzajemna pomoč in izmenjava informacij so zato v našem skupnem interesu, da lahko nenehno krepimo zaščito denarja evropskih davkoplačevalcev.
For the coming years, I would like to highlight the results of European activities to ght fraud and achieve greater visibility for the concrete support provided by OLAF and the Commission to protect the Community’s nancial interests. is report is a valuable tool in our e orts to secure confidence in European nancial management.
Upam, da bom v prihodnjih letih lahko poudaril rezultate evropskih dejavnosti za boj proti goljufijam ter dosegel večjo preglednost za konkretno podporo, ki jo OLAF in Komisija zagotavljata za zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti. To poročilo je koristno orodje pri naših prizadevanjih za zagotovitev zaupanja v evropsko nančno poslovodenje.
e Commission has set as one of its objectives to secure greater trust in how EU funds are managed.
Komisija je za enega od svojih ciljev določila zagotovitev večjega zaupanja v način upravljanja sredstev EU.
While the Treaty gives the Commission responsibility for implementing the EU budget, the debate essentially concerns the extent to which Member States are playing their part.
Medtem ko Pogodba pooblašča Komisijo za izvrševanje proračuna EU, razprava v bistvu zadeva obseg, v katerem svojo vlogo igrajo države članice.
We want to obtain a positive declaration of assurance from the European Court of Auditors and to this e ect have started a dialogue with Member States and the European Parliament about the integrated control framework and risk management.
Od Evropskega računskega sodišča želimo pridobiti pozitivno izjavo o zanesljivosti, zato smo sprožili dialog z državami članicami in Evropskim parlamentom o integriranem okviru kontrole in obvladovanju tveganj.
We want more transparency on how the EU budget is spent and who the beneficiaries are.
Treba je zagotoviti večjo transparentnost glede porabe proračuna EU in glede tega, kdo so upravičenci.
Moreover, we want to convince citizens that the EU provides real added value and that its projects are well managed.
Prav tako bi radi prepričali državljane, da EU zagotavlja resnično dodano vrednost in da svoje projekte dobro upravlja.
I personally believe that public support for the more visible political projects depends, amongst other things, on whether the EU as a whole is seen to manage taxpayers’ money with care.
Osebno verjamem, da je javna podpora za vidnejše politične projekte med drugim odvisna od tega, ali se EU kot celota zdi skrben upravitelj denarja davkoplačevalcev.
S KVice-President of the European Commission
S KPodpredsednik Evropske komisije Administrativne zadeve, revizija in boj proti goljufijam jam
In this area, our antifraud watchdog OLAF is performing a very important role, namely ghting fraud involving EU money and also illegal/irregular behaviour within the EU institutions themselves. is is not always easy.
Na tem področju opravlja naš čuvaj pred goljufijami OLAF zelo pomembno vlogo, to je boj proti goljufijam, v katere je vpleten denar EU, in tudi boj proti nezakonitemu/nepravilnemu ravnanju znotraj samih institucij EU.
Administratively speaking, OLAF is a Commission service, but it is wholly independent in its investigative function.
To ni vedno lahko. Upravno gledano je OLAF služba Komisije, vendar je v celoti neodvisen pri svoji preiskovalni funkciji. Veseli me, da se je na zaslišanju izvedenca v organizaciji Evropskega parlamenta julija 2005 izkazalo, da neodvisnost
Assessment of the 2001–05 overall strategic approach for the protection of the European Communities’ nancial interests
Ocena splošnega strateškega pristopa za obdobje 2001–2005 za zaščito nančnihinteresov Skupnosti
Results of the ght against fraud: statistics concerning fraud and other irregularitiesreported by the Member States under sectoral regulations
Rezultati boja proti goljujam: statistični podatki o goljujah in drugih nepravilnostih,ki so jih države članice sporočile v skladu s sektorskimi ureditvami
Measures taken by the Member States and the Commission in 2005
Ukrepi, ki so jih v letu 2005 sprejele države članice in Komisija
21 22 on the Protection of the European Communities’ Financial Interests and its protocols e customs information system (CIS) and the ratification of the Convention on the Use of Information Technology for Customs Purposes and of its protocol creatinga customs le identification database (FIDE) e Philip Morris International agreement
19 20 in protokolov s strani držav članic 3.3.2 Carinski informacijski sistem (CIS) ter ratifikacija Konvencije o uporabi informacijske tehnologijeza carinske namene in njenega protokola o vzpostavitvi identifikacijske podatkovne bazecarinskih datotek (FIDE) 3.3.3 Sporazum s Philip Morris International
ANNUAL REPORT 2005 FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS FIGHT AGAINST FRAUD
LETNO POROČILO 2005 POROČILO KOMISIJE O ZAŠČITI FINANČNIH INTERESOV SKUPNOSTI BOJ PROTI GOLJUFIJAM
Introduction e fourth section sets out the measures taken to improve recovery of sums not collected or paid unduly. is is the organised nancial monitoring that is the only way of remedying the damage caused to the European budget by fraud and other irregularities.
Uvod izboljšanje postopka izterjave neprejetih ali nepravilno izplačanih zneskov. Zagotovitev organiziranega nančnega spremljanja je namreč edini način za odpravo škode, ki jo goljufije in druge nepravilnosti povzročajo evropskemu proračunu.
Protection of the Communities’ nancial interests and the ght against fraud is an area in which responsibility is shared between the Community and the Member States.
Zaščita nančnih interesov Skupnosti in boj proti goljufijam sodita na področje deljene odgovornosti med Skupnostjo in državami članicami.
Each year the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, produces a report setting out the new measures taken to satisfy these obligations, in accordance with Article 280 of the EC Treaty. is report is sent to the European Parliament and the Council and is published.
V skladu s členom 280 Pogodbe ES Komisija v sodelovanju z državami članicami vsako leto predloži poročilo o novih ukrepih, ki so bili sprejeti zaradi izpolnjevanja teh obveznosti. To poročilo se pošlje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ter se objavi.
In the rst section of the report, the Commission provides an assessment of its ve-year (2001–05) overall strategic approach for the protection of the Communities’ nancial interests.
Komisija v prvi točki poročila predstavlja oceno splošnega petletnega strateškega pristopa za obdobje 2001–2005 za zaščito nančnih interesov Skupnosti.
Despite the many obstacles, the overall result of the implementation of the objectives and actions programmed is satisfactory.
Splošna ocena izvajanja načrtovanih ciljev in ukrepov je kljub številnim oviram, ki so se pojavile, zadovoljiva.
e report provides only a summary and overview of the measures taken and the results achieved by the 25 Member States. e Commission is also simultaneously publishing two working documents (1), one listing the Member States’ contributions and the other on statistics for the irregularities notified by the Member States.
Druga točka povzema rezultate statističnih podatkov o primerih nepravilnosti, sporočenih v skladu s sektorskimi ureditvami.
e second section contains a statistical summary of the cases of irregularities reported under the sectoral regulations.
Poročilo je samo povzetek in splošen pregled ukrepov, ki jih je sprejelo petindvajset držav članic, in rezultatov, ki so jih te države dosegle.
Past years’ reports and the associated Commission staworking documents are available on the OLAF web-
Komisija sočasno objavlja dva delovna dokumenta(1), od katerih eden vsebuje seznam prispevkov držav članic, drugi pa statistične podatke o nepravilnostih, ki so jih sporočile države članice.
site ( e third section contains an illustrative selection of the measures taken in 2005 by the Member States and, for the Commission, a description of the e orts made to improve the e ectiveness of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).
Poročila za pretekla leta in z njimi povezani delovni dokumenti služb Komisije so na voljo na spletni strani
) ‘List of measures taken by the Member States’ and ‘Statistical analysis of irregularities’.
Tretja točka obravnava na eni strani izbor primerov ukrepov, ki so jih države članice sprejele leta 2005, in na drugi strani prizadevanje Komisije za izboljšanje učinkovitosti Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF).
It was agreed with the Member States to present two spe-ci c themes in the fourth and h sections of the report.
(1) „Seznam ukrepov držav članic“ in „Statistična analiza nepravilnosti“.(2) http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/reports/index_en.html
) http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/reports/index_en.html
V četrti točki so predstavljeni ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti za
Assessment of the 2001–05overall strategic approachfor the protection of the European Communities’ nancial interests
Ocena splošnega strateškegapristopa za obdobje 2001–2005za zaščito nančnih interesov Skupnosti pristopom, ki pokriva vse stebre in vključuje vse sektorje, kjer se lahko pojavijo goljufije in korupcija.
Antifraud legislation must make provision for followup and cooperation, as well as prevention and detection.
Komisija je želela vzpostaviti celovit strateški pristop za to zaščito z vključitvijo vseh ukrepov, ki bi lahko pripomogli k temu skupnemu cilju, da bi zagotovila zbliževanje prizadevanj vseh nacionalnih organov in institucij, ki sodelujejo pri preprečevanju goljufij.
e protection of the European Communities’ nancial interests depends on a culture of strong cooperation between the national and Community levels. e Commission’s aim was to put in place an overall strategic approach in this eld that includes all actions contributing to this common objective, in order to ensure convergence between the e orts of the national authorities and the institutions involved in prevention. is includes operational activity, nancial follow-up, the application of sanctions, prevention and the preparation of legislation providing a framework for these activities, whether for the rst or third pillar.
To vključuje operativne dejavnosti, nančno spremljanje, uporabljene sankcije, preprečevanje in pripravo zakonodaje o teh dejavnostih, naj gre za prvi ali tretji steber.
In 2001, the Commission announced that it was putting in place an internal Commission ‘fraud-proofing’ mechanism (6) to improve the quality of legislation and the management of contracts in order to make them more ‘resistant to fraud’.
Komisija je leta 2001 napovedala vzpostavitev notranjega mehanizma(6) Komisije za preverjanje obstoja goljufij („fraud-proofing“) zaradi izboljšanja kakovosti zakonodaje in upravljanja pogodb, da bi te postale bolj „odporne proti goljufijam“.
Since 2003 an interdepartmental group has been identifying each year legislative initiatives and model contracts in the process of being drawn up that could present a major risk to the Communities’ nancial interests. e European Anti-Fraud Office is consulted ahead of the dra ing of such documents.
Od leta 2003 medresorska skupina vsako leto določi zakonodajne pobude in vzorce pogodb v pripravi, ki bi lahko pomenile večje tveganje za finančne interese Skupnosti. O teh osnutkih se pred njihovo pripravo posvetuje z Evropskim uradom za boj proti goljufijam.