natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The initial idea to include street workers from Jennersdorf in the project was suggested in 2001 to the Leader group and to regional funding authorities.
Prvotna zamisel, da se v projekt vključijo cestni delavci iz Jennersdorfa, je bila leta 2001 predlagana skupini Leader in regionalnim organom, ki zagotavljajo finančna sredstva.
A year later a youth survey was conducted which was also supported by the youth department of the Land Burgenland.
Leto pozneje je bila opravljena raziskava med mladimi, ki jo je prav tako podprl oddelek za mlade v zvezni deželi Gradiščanska.
In 2003 so-called ‘youth idea circles’ were held.
Leta 2003 so potekali tako imenovani „idejni krožki za mlade“.
These comprised various workshops and discussions between adolescents, parents and municipal representatives, where the situation of young people in the district was discussed.
Zajemali so različne delavnice in razprave med mladostniki, starši in predstavniki mesta o položaju mladih v okrožju.
The driving force behind these initiatives was Willi Brunner, pastoral associate of the Jennersdorf parish.
Gonilna sila za temi pobudami je bil Willi Brunner, duhovni pomočnik župnije Jennersdorf.
The youth idea circles were already financed by Leader+.
Idejni krožki za mlade so se že financirali iz programa Leader+.
The results of these surveys and discussions showed that young people wanted
Rezultati teh raziskav in razprav so pokazali, da si mladi želijo imeti svoboden prostor in možnost,
Other information also provided an important basis for future measures which could benefit young people, especially in terms of leisure activities, where young people look for a balance between the tensions and problems they face at home, school or work.
Druge informacije so tudi zagotovile pomembno podlago za prihodnje ukrepe, ki bi lahko koristili mladim, zlasti pri prostočasnih dejavnostih, pri katerih iščejo ravnovesje med pritiski in težavami, s katerimi se srečujejo doma, v službi ali na delovnem mestu.
If they don’t have the means to come to terms with such issues, then this could lead to aggressive behaviour, psychological illnesses or even drug abuse.
Če nimajo sredstev, s katerimi bi rešili taka vprašanja, to lahko vodi v agresivno vedenje, psiholo-ške bolezni ali celo zlorabo drog.
The people responsible in the region therefore came to the following conclusion: that preventative measures must gear any proposals concerning leisure and supervision towards the needs of young people.
Odgovorne osebe v regiji so zato sklenile, da morajo preventivni ukrepi vse predlo-ge o prostem času in nadzoru voditi v skladu s potrebami mladih.
The range of tasks for these two supervisors can be summarised as follows:
Naloge obeh nadzornikov lahko povzamemo na naslednji način:
As a prerequisite and basis for regional youth supervision, a central youth centre was created in Jennersdorf, the district capital.
Osnovni pogoj in podlaga za regionalni nadzor za mlade je bila ustanovitev osrednjega mladinskega centra v Jenner-sdorfu, glavnem mestu okrožja.
This youth centre co-supervises the youth rooms in the municipalities (which already partly existed).
Ta mladinski center sonad-zira mladinske prostore po mestnih občinah (ki so delno že obstajali).
All the district organisations concerned with young people took part in establishing the youth facilities and their supervision, for example: the district government’s youth welfare of-ce; municipalities; clubs (voluntary rest brigade, sports clubs, music societies, etc.); religious communities; and the police.
Vse okrožne organizacije, ki se ukvarjajo z mladimi, so sodelovale pri vzpostavljanju objektov za mlade in njihovem nadzoru, na primer socialni urad za mlade okrožne vlade, mestne občine, klubi (prostovoljno gasilsko društvo, športni klubi, glasbena društva itd.), verske skupnosti in policija.
In creating the central and decentralised structures, the poor mobility of young people as well as the district’s particular geographic, social and cultural conditions were taken into account.
Pri vzpostavljanju osrednjih in decentraliziranih struktur so upoštevali slabo mobilnost mladih ter posebne geografske, socialne in kulturne razmere v okrožju.
Based on the survey results, the project’s priority goal and guiding principle was to provide young people with a place where they could meet and with no pressure to consume.
Na podlagi rezultatov raziskave sta bila prednostni cilj projekta in njegovo vodilno načelo mladim zagotoviti prostor, v katerem se lahko sestajajo in jih nihče ne sili, naj zapra-vljajo denar.
These meeting places were not just furnished for young people but mainly by the young people themselves according to their own vision.
Ta shajališča so bila ne le opremljena za mlade, ampak so jih tudi opremili predvsem mladi sami v skladu s svojo predstavo.
®act as a contact person for young people and municipalities in developing projects, and in the event of con-icts and problems;®perceive and act upon the requirements and individual interests of young people;®support and instruct young people in the self-adminis-tration of the youth rooms;®take over the administration of youth rooms when there is no person of the right age available in the municipality;®motivate and develop relationships with the young people;®develop services related to leisure activities/events;®organise and carry out events suitable for young people;®networking of all people and facilities within the district concerned with young people;®gender-specic work with boys and girls;®organise and carry out outdoor activities and take part in pedagogical projects;®stimulate a feeling of well-being and substance abuse prevention;®refer adolescents with psychosocial or psychiatric problems to experts for treatment and supervision;®preventative work with young people prone to violence so as to prevent criminalisation.
®nastopati kot kontaktna oseba za mlade in mestne občine pri projektih v razvoju ter sporih in težavah,®zaznati in ukrepati na podlagi zahtev in posameznih in-teresov mladih,®podpirati in poučevati mlade pri samostojnem upravljanju mladinskih prostorov,®prevzeti upravljanje mladinskih prostorov, kadar v mestni občini ni na voljo polnoletnih oseb,®motivirati in razvijati odnose z mladimi,®razvijati storitve, povezane s prostočasnimi dejavnostmi/dogodki,®organizirati in izvajati dogodke, primerne za mlade,®znotraj okrožja povezovati v omrežja vse ljudi in objekte, ki so povezani z mladimi,®razdeliti posebno delo po spolu med deklice in dečke,®organizirati in izvajati dejavnosti na prostem ter sodelovati pri pedagoških projektih,®spodbujati občutek ugodja in preprečevati zlorabe pre-povedanih snovi,®napotiti mladoletnike s psihološkimi ali psihiatričnimi težavami k strokovnjakom na zdravljenje in v nadzor,®preventivno delati z mladimi, nagnjenimi k nasilju, da bi preprečili kazniva dejanja.
Activities of the youth centres
… in dejavnosti mladinskih centrov
Both the youth centre and the youth rooms are self-run both in terms of their organisation and administration.
Mladinski center in mladinski prostori sami vodjo svojo organizacijo in upravo.
The grassroots democratic approach to self-administration makes young people learn to take responsibility and to develop a willingness to compromise and work together as a team.
Z demokratičnim ljudskim pristopom k samoupravljanju se mladi naučijo prevzemati odgovornost in razvijati pripravljenost za sklepanje kompromisov ter delovati kot skupina.
When conflicting/problematic situations arise, a professional youth leader (supervisor) is at hand.
Ko se pojavi koniktna/težavna situacija, se lahko obrnejo na strokovnega vodjo za mlade (nadzornika).
Activities of the youth leaders
Dejavnosti vodij za mlade …
The activities carried out and organised by the young people themselves, or with the help of the youth leaders, range from joint leisure activities (visiting a spa, cooking, sport, etc.) to information events on topics like ‘fair trade’ or ‘protection of children and young persons’.
Dejavnosti, ki jih izvajajo in organizirajo mladi sami ali s pomočjo vodij za mlade, segajo od skupnih prostočasnih dejavnosti (obiska toplic, kuhanja, športa itd.) do informacijskih dogodkov o temah, kot so „poštena trgovina“ ali „varstvo otrok in mladih“.
Furthermore, there are events organised jointly by the youth centres of all seven municipalities: summer camps, football tournaments, snowboarding and skiing weekends.
Poleg tega so tu tudi dogodki, ki jih skupaj organizirajo mladinski centri vseh sedmih mestnih občin, in sicer poletni tabori, nogometni turnirji, deskanje na snegu in smučarski vikendi.
With the support of Leader, two professional youth leaders (a man and a woman) were employed in the region.
S podporo programa Leader sta se v regiji zaposlili dve strokovni vodji za mlade (moški in ženska).
They supported the municipalities and young people even during the setting-up of the youth centres.
Mlade in mestne občine sta podpirala celo med ustanavljanjem mladinskih centrov.
Their main job, however, is to regularly serve as a contact point in the youth rooms at fixed times several times a week, and to develop leisure activities together with the young people.
Njuna glavna naloga je biti stalna kontaktna točka v mladinskih prostorih ob določenih urah večkrat na teden in skupaj z mladimi razvijati prostočasne dejavnosti.
As experts in youth work, the two youth leaders are naturally also available to the region’s municipal representatives for matters concerning young people.
Kot strokovnjaka za zaposlovanje mladih sta bila seveda na voljo tudi predstavnikom mestnih občin v regiji za zadeve, povezane z mladimi.
Youth supervision in Jennersdorf
Nadzor za mlade v Jennersdorfu
Important goals to be achieved by the self-administered youth centres and the professionalisation of the youth work were, for example:
Pomembni cilji, ki naj bi jih dosegli z mladinskimi centri, ki jih mladi samostojno upravljajo, in profesionalizacijo mladinskega dela, so na primer:
Member State: Austria Region, district: Burgenland, southern Burgenland Name of the LAG: Südburgenland plus Population: 103 736Surface area: 1 456 km²
Država članica: Avstrija Regija, okrožje: Gradiščanska, Južna Gradiščanska Ime lokalne akcijske skupine: Südburgenland plus Prebivalstvo: 103 736Površina: 1 456 km²
Project total cost: EUR 283 182EU: EUR 141 591Other public funds: EUR 2 825Private funds: EUR 138 766 Project eligibility: May 2004–December 2006
Skupni strošek projekta: 283 182 EUREU: 141 591 EURDruga javna sredstva: 2 825 EURZasebna sredstva: 138 766 EUR Obdobje upravičenosti projekta: maj 2004–december 2006
®that young people develop group spirit and a sense of solidarity;®that the feeling among young people of belonging to their municipality should be strengthened;®that young people’s own initiatives should be promot-ed;®to develop a democratic awareness;®to awaken young people’s voluntary commitment within the community;®to learn to take responsibility and become active in a self-determined way;
®razvijanje skupinskega duha in občutka solidarnosti med mladimi,®krepitev občutka med mladimi, da pripadajo svoji mestni občini,®spodbujanje lastnih pobud mladih,®razvijanje demokratične zavesti,®prebujanje prostovoljnega prevzemanja obveznosti mladih znotraj skupnosti,®učenje prevzemanja odgovornosti in dejavne vloge, za katero se sami odločijo,
®to be able to bring one’s own ideas and interests in the design of one’s own lifeworld(1).
®sposobnost prinesti lastne zamisli in zanimanja v model lastnega življenjskega sveta (1).
Leader+ funding: Innovation and sustainability
Financiranje programa Leader+: inovativnost in trajnost
Contact person: Thomas Novoszel Address: Europastraße 1, A-7540 Güssing Tel. (43-3322) 901 08 80 20Fax (43-3322) 901 08 80 24E-mail: offi c e . s u ed @ leader plus . at Website: www.leaderplus.at
Ime kontaktne osebe: Thomas Novoszel Naslov: Europastraße 1, A-7540 Güssing Tel. +43 3322901088020Faks +43 3322901088024E-naslov: office.sued@leaderplus.at Spletna stran: www.leaderplus.at
Leader+ funds sponsored the employment of both youth leaders (personnel costs), the holding of youth workshops (youth circles) in the municipalities of the region, further education measures and public relations, as well as minor investments in information technology.
S sredstvi programa Leader+ so se sponzorirali zaposlitev obeh vodij za mlade (stroški dela), delavnice za mlade (mla-dinski krožki) v mestnih občinah v regiji, ukrepi nadaljnjega izobraževanja, odnosi z javnostmi in manjše naložbe v in-formacijsko tehnologijo.
Setting up professional (mobile) youth supervision including decentralised youth centres in the municipalities has been a pilot project for the whole Land of Burgenland.
Vzpostavljanje strokovnega (premičnega) nadzora za mlade, vključno z decentraliziranimi mladinskimi centri v mestnih občinah, je bil pilotni projekt za vso deželo Gradiščanska.
With the support of Leader+ something new has been created which has never existed in this form in the Burgenland before.
S podporo programa Leader+ so bile ustvarjene novosti, ki niso na Gradiščanskem nikoli prej obstajale v taki obliki.
The comprehensive offer of help and support services for young people is a special innovation, the extent of which is also unusual in rural regions.
Vse-stranska ponudba pomoči in podpornih storitev za mlade je posebna inovacija, katere obseg je prav tako nenavaden za podeželske regije. Inovativen je tudi organizacijski model mladinskih prostorov, to je samoupravljanje mladih.
The sustainability of the project is reflected by the fact that the youth centres and the professional youth supervision are being carried on even after Leader funding has expired.
Trajnost projekta se kaže v tem, da mladinski centri in strokovni nadzor za mlade živijo naprej tudi po tem, ko se je končalo nanciranje programa Leader.
Photos provided by the Austrian National Network Unit
Fotografije: avstrijska nacionalna omrežna enota
(1) Lifeworld is a concept used in philosophy and in some social sciences, meaning the world “as lived” prior to reflective representation.
(1) Življenjski svet je pojem v lozoji in nekaterih družbenih vedah, ki pomeni svet, „kot ga živiš“, pred reektivno predstavo.
New member states
Nove države članice
Perspectives on rural development in Bulgaria and Romania
Možnosti za razvoj podeželja v Bolgariji in Romuniji
By Roland Hamel, Resident Twinning Adviser, Twinning for Rural Development and Fisheries Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development Office, Bucharest, Romania
Avtor: Roland Hamel, nacionalni svetovalec za tesno sodelovanje na področju razvoja podeželja in ribištva, Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo in razvoj podeželja, Bukarešta, Romunija.
Introduction to take charge of Community programme management, monitoring and payment services.
Uvod upravljanje, spremljanje in plačilne storitve v okviru programa Skupnosti.
Bulgaria and Romania, as with the other Member States of the European Union, are preparing talks with the European Commission, in order to launch their ambitious rural development programmes for the period 2007–13 as soon as possible.
Bolgarija in Romunija pripravljata pogovore z Evropsko ko-misijo ter drugimi državami članicami Evropske unije, da bi čim prej začeli svoje ambiciozne programe za razvoj podeželja za obdobje 2007–2013.
The strategies developed by these two countries are closely linked to those issues which confront their particular rural regions.
Strategije, ki sta jih razvili ti državi, so tesno povezane z vpra-šanji, s katerimi se srečujejo njune posamezne podeželske regije.
They will allow rural policies to be implemented whose impact will encourage the socioeconomic transformations necessary to achieve convergence of these economies in transition.
Omogočile bodo izvajanje politik podeželja, katerih vpliv bo spodbudil socialno-ekonomsko preoblikovanje, potrebno za doseganje konvergenčnosti teh gospodarstev v tranziciji.
As prescribed by Council regulations(1), these negotiations are based on an analysis of national strategic plans and rural development programmes which specify the conditions governing the intervention of policies derived from clearly defined European policy goals.
Kot je določeno v uredbah Sveta (1), ta pogajanja temeljijo na analizi nacionalnih strateških načrtov in programov za razvoj podeželja, v katerih so določeni pogoji, ki urejajo poseg politik, izvirajočih iz jasno opredeljenih ciljev evropske politike.
These programmes will replace Sapard, which in the pre-accession stage helped normalise farming and agri-food structures and train personnel
Ti programi bodo zamenjali Posebni pristopni program za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja (SAPARD), ki je v predpristopnem obdobju pomagal urejati kmetijske in agroživilske strukture ter usposabljati osebje, da prevzame
One of the chief characteristics of these economies is in fact the socioeconomic weight of their rural areas, which is much greater than for the EU-25 and even in the case of the 10 New Member States that joined in 2004, as summarised in the table below.
Ena od glavnih značilnosti teh gospodarstev je dejansko socialno-ekonomska teža njihovih podeželskih območij, ki je mnogo večja kot pri EU-25 in celo pri desetih novih državah članicah (NDČ), ki so se pridružile leta 2004, kot je prikazano v spodnji preglednici:
Rural areas(
Podeželje (
% of territory
Odstotek ozemlja
% of population
Odstotek prebivalstva
% of employment
Odstotek zaposlitev
% GDP generated by the primary sector
Odstotek BDP, ustvarjen v primarnem sektorju
% of GDP
Odstotek BDP
(2) OECD criterion: Area with a population density of less than 150 /km2.
Septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP).(2) Merilo OECD: območje z gostoto prebivalstva do 150/km2.
primary sector marked by the fragmentation of agricultural land and minimal mechanisation.
z razdrobljenostjo kmetijskega zemljišča in minimalno kmetijsko mehanizacijo.
These two countries want to use their strategies to encourage the creation of a network of economically viable medi-um-sized farms, similar to those that predominate in most European countries, chiefly through a restructuring of their semi-subsistence farms.
Ti dve državi želita uporabiti svoje strategije, da bi spod-budili ustvarjanje omrežja ekonomsko upravičenih srednje velikih kmetij, podobnih tistim, ki prevladujejo v večini evropskih držav, predvsem s prestrukturiranjem svojih delno samooskrbnih kmetij.
…with an ageing and relatively uneducated population…
… s starajočim se in razmeroma neizobraženim prebivalstvom …
In these two countries, rural areas are not only where much of the population lives and works, but also where a signi -cant share of these nations’ wealth is created.
Na podeželju teh dveh držav živi in dela veliko prebivalcev, poleg tega pa se ustvari tudi velik delež nacionalnega premoženja.
The gap between these economies and those of the countries of the EU-25 is striking, particularly with regard to rural employment, which in Bulgaria and Romania accounts for nearly 57 % of total jobs compared with 16 % in the rest of Europe.
Vrzel med temi gospodarstvi in gospodarstvi držav EU-25 je zelo izrazita, zlasti glede zaposlovanja na podeželju, ki v Bolgariji in Romuniji predstavlja skoraj 57 % vseh zaposlitev, medtem ko je ta delež za preostanek Evrope 16-odstotni.
With regard to the rural contribution to GDP, 48.4 % of added value in Bulgaria is being generated in rural areas, compared with 13.1 % in the EU-25.
Glede prispevka podeželja k BDP se v Bolgariji na podeželju ustvari 48,4 % dodane vrednosti, v EU-25 pa 13,1 %.
There is also a notable gap in comparison with the countries that joined the EU in 2004, where the restructuring of the primary sector is generally well under way: on average, the primary sector accounts for only 4.1 % of GDP in those 10 countries, compared with 12 % in the two newest Member States.
Velika vrzel je tudi v primerjavi z državami, ki so se EU pridružile leta 2004 in v katerih prestrukturiranje primarnega sektorja večinoma dobro poteka: primarni sektor v teh desetih državah povprečno predstavlja samo 4,1 % BDP, v dveh najnovejših državah članicah pa 12 %.
In Romania, farmers constitute a large proportion of the active population in rural areas, representing nearly 69 % of the rural population.
V Romuniji kmetje sestavljajo velik delež aktivnega prebivalstva na podeželju, ki predstavlja skoraj 69 % podeželskega prebivalstva.
Virtually the whole of this agricultural population currently lives in semi-subsistence conditions: nearly 93 % in Bulgaria and 98 % in Romania.
Dejansko celotno kmečko prebivalstvo trenutno živi v delno samooskrbnih razmerah, in sicer skoraj 93 % v Bolgariji in 98 % v Romuniji.
This situation masks a high level of underemployment that is not reflected in the unemployment rates, which are comparable to those in other European Union countries (8 % in Romania, 12 % in Bulgaria).
To stanje prikriva visoko raven brezposelnosti, ki se ne kaže v stopnjah brezposelnosti, primerljivih s stopnjami v drugih državah Evropske unije (8 % v Romuniji in 12 % v Bolgariji).
This population is, typically: ageing (nearly 65 % of Romanian and Bulgarian farmers are more than 55 years old); and little educated (4.4 % of Bulgarian farmers and only 1.8 % of the rural population of Romania have a university education).
Za to prebivalstvo je značilno, da se stara, saj je skoraj 65 % romunskih in bolgarskih kmetov starejših od 55 let in ima nizko izobrazbo, univerzitetno izobrazbo ima namreč 4,4 % podeželskega prebivalstva v Bolgariji in samo 1,8 % v Romuniji.
With a view to creating a network of family farms, older farmers will be encouraged to retire in order to facilitate the consolidation of fragmented landholdings and the setting-up of younger farmers, while the implementation of training and advisory actions will also be promoted.
Da bi vzpostavili omrežje družinskih kmetij, se bo spodbujalo upokojevanje starejših kmetov za lažje združevanje raz-drobljenih zemljiških posesti in prevzem kmetij mlajših kmetov, ob tem pa se bo spodbujalo izvajanje ukrepov za usposabljanje in svetovanje.
The restructuring of the primary sector in these two economies is the chief concern of rural development policy for the period 2007–13.
Kmetijski in agroživilski sektor je zrel za prestrukturiranje …
… and an uncompetitive agri-food sector acting as a brake on restructuring the primary sector
… ter nekonkurenčnim agroživilskim sektorjem, ki zavira prestrukturiranje primarnega sektorja
Bulgaria and Romania account for nearly 35 % of all farms in the European Union.
Bolgarija in Romunija imata 35 % vseh kmetij v Evropski uniji.
In these countries the sector is characterised by a duality, in which a minority of large farms account for the greater part of the useful agricultural land (UAL), and exist side by side with a majority of tiny holdings (less than 5 hectares) and working a relatively small fraction of the UAL.
V teh državah je za sektor značilna dvojnost, pri kateri manjšina velikih kmetij predstavlja večji del kmetijsko uporabnih zemljišč (UAL) in obstaja vzporedno z večino majhnih gospodarstev (manj kot 5 hektarov), ki obdeluje-jo sorazmerno majhen del kmetijsko uporabnih zemljišč.
In Romania, 45 % of the UAL is owned by a minority of large farms (5 % of the total), while the remaining 55 % supports the 4.5 million smallholdings that constitute the vast majority of farm properties (95 %).
V Romuniji je 45 % UAL v lasti manjšine velikih kmetij (5 % vseh kmetij), medtem ko preostalih 55 % podpira 4,5 milijona majhnih gospodarstev, ki sestavljajo veliko večino kmetij (95 %).
The phenomenon is even more pronounced in Bulgaria, where 0.8 % of farms occupy 70 % of UAL, leaving just 30 % for the remaining 99.2 % (675 000 farms).
Ta pojav je še očitnejši v Bolgariji, kjer 0,8 % kmetij upravlja 70 % UAL, preostalih 30 % pa 99,2 % (675 000 kmetij).