natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters is to be interpreted as meaning that the addressee of a document instituting the proceedings which is to be served does not have the right to refuse to accept that document, provided that it enables the addressee to assert his rights in legal proceedings in the Member State of transmission, where annexes are attached to that document consisting of documentary evidence which is not in the language of the Member State addressed or in a language of the Member State of transmission which the addressee understands, but which has a purely evidential function and is not necessary for understanding the subjectmatter of the claim and the cause of action.
Člen 8(1) Uredbe št. 1348/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o vročanju sodnih in zunajsodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah je treba razlagati tako, da naslovnik tožbe za vročitev, ki lahko uveljavi svoje pravice v okviru sodnega postopka v državi članici prosilki, nima pravice zavrniti sprejema te tožbe, če so tožbi priložene priloge z dokazili, ki sicer niso napisane v jeziku zaprošene države članice ali v jeziku države članice prosilke, ki ga naslovnik razume, vendar opravljajo zgolj dokazno funkcijo in niso nujne za razumevanje predmeta in podlage zahtevka.
It is for the national court to determine whether the content of the document instituting the proceedings is sufficient to enable the defendant to assert his rights or whether it is necessary for the party instituting the proceedings to remedy the fact that a necessary annex has not been translated.
Nacionalno sodišče mora preveriti, ali tožena stranka glede na vsebino tožbe lahko uveljavlja svoje pravice ali pa mora pošiljatelj zagotoviti prevod priloge, ki jo je treba nujno priložiti.
Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 1348/2000 is to be interpreted as meaning that the fact that the addressee of a document served has agreed in a contract concluded with the applicant in the course of his business that correspondence is to be conducted in the language of the Member State of transmission does not give rise to a presumption of knowledge of that language, but is evidence which the court may take into account in determining whether that addressee understands the language of the Member State of transmission.
Člen 8(1)(b) Uredbe št. 1348/2000 je treba razlagati tako, da dejstvo, da se je naslovnik vročenega pisanja pri opravljanju svoje poslovne dejavnosti v pogodbi s tožečo stranko dogovoril, da bo dopisovanje potekalo v jeziku te države članice, ne ustvarja domneve o znanju jezika, je pa znak, na katerega se lahko sodišče opre pri ugotavljanju, ali naslovnik razume jezik države članice prosilke.
Article 8(1) of Regulation No 1348/2000 is to be interpreted as meaning that the addressee of a document served may not in any event rely on that provision in order to refuse acceptance of annexes to the document which are not in the language of the Member State addressed or in a language of the Member State of transmission which the addressee understands where the addressee concluded a contract in the course of his business in which he agreed that correspondence was to be conducted in the language of the Member State of transmission and the annexes concern that correspondence and are written in the agreed language.
Člen 8(1) Uredbe št. 1348/2000 je treba razlagati tako, da naslovnik vročene tožbe ne sme s sklicevanjem na to določbo zavrniti sprejema prilog k pisanju, ki niso napisane v jeziku zaprošene države članice ali jeziku države članice prosilke, ki ga naslovnik razume, kadar pri opravljanju svoje poslovne dejavnosti sklene pogodbo in se v njej dogovori, da bo dopisovanje potekalo v jeziku države članice prosilke, ter se priloge nanašajo na to dopisovanje in so napisane v dogovorjenem jeziku.
Case C-39/07
Zadeva C-39/07
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 89/48/EEC — Recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration — National legislation not providing for the recognition of diplomas allowing access to the profession of hospital pharmacist — Failure to transpose the directive)
„Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Direktiva 89/48/EGS – Priznavanje visoko�olskih diplom, pridobljenih s poklicnim izobraževanjem in usposabljanjem, ki traja najmanj tri leta – Nacionalna zakonodaja, ki ne določa priznanja diplom, ki omogočajo možnost opravljanja poklica bolni�ničnega farmacevta – Neopravljen prenos direktive“
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 8 May 2008
Sodba Sodi�ča (drugi senat) z dne 8. maja 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Freedom of movement for persons — Freedom of establishment — Workers — Recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration — Scope of Directive 89/48
Prosto gibanje oseb – Svoboda ustanavljanja – Delavci – Priznavanje visokošolskih diplom, pridobljenih s poklicnim izobraževanjem in usposabljanjem, ki traja najmanj tri leta – Področje uporabe Direktive 89/48
(Arts 43, second para., and 47(3) EC; Council Directive 89/48)
(člen 43, drugi odstavek, ES in člen 47(3) ES; Direktiva Sveta 89/48)
SUMMARY — CASE C-39/07
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-39/07
Freedom of movement for persons — Freedom of establishment — Recognition of diplomas and formal qualifications
Prosto gibanje oseb – Svoboda ustanavljanja – Priznavanje diplom in nazivov (člen 47(3) ES)
implement such a system from being applied to the health professions. Such an interpretation would result not only in a failure to apply Directive 89/48 but more generally in precluding the right of Community nationals to recognition of diplomas of specialisations in pharmacy, even though that right stems from the second paragraph of Article 43 EC.
Država članica, ki ne sprejme vseh potrebnih ukrepov za prenos Direktive 89/48/EGS o splo�nem sistemu priznavanja visoko�olskih diplom, pridobljenih s poklicnim izobraževanjem in usposabljanjem, ki traja najmanj tri leta, glede poklica bolni�ničnega farmacevta, ne izpolnili obveznosti iz te direktive.
A Member State which fails to adopt all the measures necessary to transpose Directive 89/48 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration as far as the profession of hospital pharmacist is concerned has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.
cilj je vzpostavitev takega sistema, lahko uporabljala za poklice v zdravstvu. Taka razlaga bi namreč povzročila ne le neuporabo Direktive 89/48, ampak �e splo�neje – izključitev pravice državljanov Skupnosti do priznanja diplom iz specializacije v farmaciji, medtem ko ta pravica izhaja iz člena 43, drugi odstavek, ES.
Accordingly, the recognition of diplomas giving access to the profession of hospital pharmacist falls within the scope of Directive 89/48 and the Member States must provide for a system allowing for that recognition, under the conditions laid down in that directive.
Iz tega sledi, da priznavanje diplom, ki dajejo možnost opravljanja poklica bolni�ničnega farmacevta, spada na področje uporabe Direktive 89/48 in da morajo države članice določiti sistem, ki bo omogočal tako priznavanje na podlagi pogojev, določenih s to direktivo.
The right to recognition of diplomas is guaranteed as an expression of the fundamental right to freedom of establishment by the second paragraph of Article 43 EC.
Pravica do priznanja diplom je zagotovljena s členom 43, drugi odstavek, ES kot izraz temeljne pravice do svobode ustanavljanja.
Directive 89/48, which lays down a ‘method of recognition’ of the diplomas which it covers, establishes a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas enabling the holder to gain access to a regulated profession and thus to exercise a right enshrined in the Treaty.
Direktiva 89/48, ki določa „način priznavanja“ diplom, na katere se nana�a, določa splo�ni sistem priznavanja visoko�olskih diplom, ki omogoča možnost opravljanja reguliranega poklica in s tem izvajanje pravice, ki je določena s Pogodbo.
Article 47(3) EC cannot be interpreted as precluding a directive designed to
Člena 47(3) ES ni mogoče razlagati tako, da izključuje, da bi se direktiva, katere
(see paras 37-39, 43, 44, operative part)
(Glej točke od 37 do 39, 43, 44 in izrek.)
therefore concerns a system which must be designed in such a way as to correspond with the progressive harmonisation of the provisions on the exercise of those professions.
vzpostaviti povezano s postopno uskladitvijo določb o opravljanju navedenih poklicev.
The objective of Article 47(3) EC is not to restrict the scope of the right to recognition of diplomas, but to avoid the implementation of a system for the automatic recognition of diplomas giving access to the health professions in the absence of coordination of the provisions governing the exercise of those professions.
Cilj člena 47(3) ES ni omejitev obsega pravice do priznanja diplom, ampak preprečitev izvajanja sistema avtomatičnega priznavanja diplom za možnost opravljanja poklicev v zdravstvu brez uskladitve določb, ki urejajo opravljanje teh poklicev.
That provision of the Treaty
Ta določba Pogodbe se nana�a na tak sistem, ki ga je treba
2008 — CASE C-39/07
2008 – ZADEVA C-39/07
ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 1 February 2007,
V zadevi C-39/07, zaradi tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti na podlagi člena 226 ES, vložene 1. februarja 2007,
Kingdom of Spain, represented by M. Muñoz Pérez, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg, defendant,
Kraljevini Španiji, ki jo zastopa M. Muñoz Pérez, zastopnik, z naslovom za vročanje v Luxembourgu, tožena stranka,
Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro, Registrar: R. Grass, having regard to the written procedure, having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion, gives the following
Poiares Maduro, sodni tajnik: R. Grass, na podlagi pisnega postopka, na podlagi sklepa, sprejetega po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca, da bo v zadevi razsojeno brez sklepnih predlogov, izreka naslednjo
By its application, the Commission of the European Communities asks the Court to declare that, by failing to adopt all the measures necessary to transpose Council Directive 89/48/EEC of 21 December 1988 on a general system for the recognition of higher-education diplomas awarded on completion of professional education and training of at least three years’ duration (OJ 1989 L 19, p.
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti s tožbo Sodi�ču predlaga, naj ugotovi, da Kraljevina Španija s tem, da ni sprejela vseh ustreznih ukrepov za prenos Direktive Sveta 89/48/EGS z dne 21. decembra 1988 o splo�nem sistemu priznavanja visoko�olskih diplom, pridobljenih s poklicnim izobraževanjem in usposabljanjem, ki traja najmanj tri leta (UL 1989, L 19, str.
16), as far as the profession of hospital pharmacist is concerned, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.
16) glede poklica bolni�ničnega farmacevta, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz te direktive.
On 16 September 1985, the Council adopted Directive 85/432/EEC concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of certain activities in the field of pharmacy (OJ 1985 L 253, p. 34).
Svet je 16. septembra 1985 sprejel Direktivo 85/432/EGS, katere cilj je uskladitev zakonov in drugih predpisov v zvezi z nekaterimi dejavnostmi na področju farmacije (UL L 253, str. 34).
Under Article 1(1) of Directive 85/432:
Člen 1(1) Direktive 85/432 določa:
‘Member States shall ensure that holders of a diploma, certificate or other university or equivalent qualification in pharmacy which meets the conditions laid down in Article 2 shall be entitled at least to access to the activities mentioned in paragraph 2 and to pursue such activities subject, where appropriate, to the requirement of additional professional experience.’
„Države članice imetnikom diplome, spričevala ali druge univerzitetne ali enakovredne izobrazbe iz farmacije, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 2, zagotovijo pravico vsaj do dostopa do dejavnosti iz odstavka 2 in opravljanja tak�nih dejavnosti, ob upo�tevanju, kjer je to primerno, zahtev glede dodatnih poklicnih izku�enj.“
Article 3 of Directive 85/432 provides:
Člen 3 Direktive 85/432 določa:
‘Not more than three years after the expiry of the timelimit laid down in Article 5, the Commission shall submit to the Council appropriate proposals on specialisations in pharmacy and in particular hospital pharmacy.
„Najpozneje v treh letih po izteku roka iz člena 5 Komisija predloži Svetu ustrezne predloge o specializacijah v farmaciji in zlasti bolni�nični farmaciji.
The Council shall examine these proposals within one year.’
Svet te predloge preuči v enem letu.“
On 16 September 1985, the Council adopted Directive 85/433/EEC concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in pharmacy, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment relating to certain activities in the field of pharmacy (OJ 1985 L 253, p. 37).
Svet je 16. septembra 1985 sprejel Direktivo 85/433/EGS, katere cilj je vzajemno priznavanje diplom, spričeval in drugih dokazil o formalnih kvalifikacijah iz farmacije, vključno z ukrepi za učinkovito uresničevanje pravice do ustanavljanja za nekatere farmacevtske dejavnosti (UL L 253, str. 37).
Article 2(1) of Directive 85/433, as amended by Directive 2001/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2001 (OJ 2001 L 206, p.
Člen 2(1) Direktive 85/433, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2001/19/ES z dne 14. maja 2001 (UL L 206, str.
1), provides:
1), določa:
‘Each Member State shall recognise the diplomas, certificates and other formal qualifications listed in the Annex awarded to nationals of Member States by other Member States in accordance with Article 2 of Directive 85/432 … by giving such qualifications, as regards the right of access to and pursuit of the activities referred to in Article 1, the same effect in its territory as those diplomas, certificates and other formal qualifications, listed in the Annex, which it itself awards.’
„Vsaka država članica priznava diplome, spričevala in druga dokazila o formalnih kvalifikacijah iz člena 4, ki jih podeljujejo države članice državljanom drugih držav članic v skladu s členom 2 Direktive 85/432 […], tako, da glede pravice dostopa do in opravljanja dejavnosti iz člena 1 na svojem ozemlju priznava tem kvalifikacijam enak učinek[,] kot jih imajo diplome, spričevala in druge formalne kvalifikacije iz člena 4, ki jih sama podeljuje.“
Article 1 of Directive 89/48, as amended by Directive 2001/19, provides:
Člen 1 Direktive 89/48, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2001/19, določa:
(a) diploma: any diploma, certificate or other evidence of formal qualifications or any set of such diplomas, certificates or other evidence:
„Za namene te direktive je: a) diploma vsaka diploma, spričevalo ali drugo dokazilo o formalnih kvalifikacijah ali vsaka celota takih diplom, spričeval ali drugih dokazil:
— which shows that the holder has successfully completed a post-secondary course of at least three years’ duration, or of an equivalent duration part-time, at a university or establishment of higher education or another establishment of equivalent level and, where appropriate, that he has successfully completed the professional training required in addition to the post-secondary course, and
– ki dokazuje, da je imetnik uspe�no končal vsaj triletni posrednje�olski izobraževalni program ali enakovredno dobo izrednega izobraževanja na univerzi, visoko�olski ustanovi ali drugi ustanovi enakovredne ravni ter da je, kadar je to primerno, opravil strokovno usposabljanje, ki se zahteva poleg visoko�olske izobrazbe,
— which shows that the holder has the professional qualifications required for the takingup or pursuit of a regulated profession in that Member State,
– iz katere je razvidno, da ima imetnik poklicne kvalifikacije, zahtevane za dostop in opravljanje določenega poklica v tej državi članici,
COMMISSION v SPAIN provided that the education and training attested by the diploma, certificate or other evidence of formal qualifications were received mainly in the Community, or the holder thereof has three years’ professional experience certified by the Member State which recognised a third-country diploma, certificate or other evidence of formal qualifications.
KOMISIJA PROTI ŠPANIJI če je bilo izobraževanje in usposabljanje, potrjeno s pridobitvijo te diplome, spričevala ali drugega dokazila o formalnih kvalifikacijah, v prevladujoči meri pridobljeno v Skupnosti, ali če ima imetnik tri leta poklicnih izku�enj, potrjenih […] s strani države članice, ki je priznala diplomo, spričevalo ali druga dokazila o formalnih kvalifikacijah, izdana v tretji državi.
(d) regulated professional activity: a professional activity, in so far as the takingup or pursuit of such activity or one of its modes of pursuit in a Member State is subject, directly or indirectly by virtue of laws, regulations or administrative provisions, to the possession of a diploma.
[…] c) reguliran poklic: je regulirana poklicna aktivnost ali niz aktivnosti, ki tvorijo ta poklic v neki državi članici; d) regulirana poklicna aktivnost: je poklicna aktivnost, za katero država članica glede dostopa ali opravljanja ali enega od pogojev za opravljanje neposredno ali posredno na podlagi zakonov in drugih predpisov zahteva določeno diplomo.
The following in particular shall constitute a mode of pursuit of a regulated professional activity:
Zlasti se v nadaljevanju pogoji za opravljanje regulirane poklicne aktivnosti nana�ajo na:
— pursuit of an activity under a professional title, in so far as the use of such a title is reserved to the holders of a diploma governed by laws, regulations or administrative provisions,
– opravljanje aktivnosti pod določenim strokovnim nazivom, ko je uporaba takega naziva rezervirana za imetnike diplome, ki jo določajo zakoni in drugi predpisi,
Article 2 of Directive 89/48 provides:
Člen 2 Direktive 89/48 določa:
‘This Directive shall apply to any national of a Member State wishing to pursue a regulated profession in a host Member State in a selfemployed capacity or as an employed person.
„Ta direktiva velja za vsakega državljana države članice, ki želi opravljati reguliran poklic v državi članici gostiteljici kot samozaposlena ali zaposlena oseba.
This Directive shall not apply to professions which are the subject of a separate directive establishing arrangements for the mutual recognition of diplomas by Member States.’
Ta direktiva ne velja za poklice, ki so predmet posebne direktive, ki med državami članicami ureja vzajemno priznavanje diplom.“
Article 4 of Directive 89/48 provides:
Člen 4 Direktive 89/48 določa:
Notwithstanding Article 3 [on the right of nationals of another Member State to take up a regulated profession], the host Member State may also require the applicant:
Ne glede na člen 3 lahko država članica gostiteljica ?glede pravice dostopa državljana druge države članice do reguliranega poklica? od kandidata tudi zahteva:
(b) to complete an adaptation period not exceeding three years or take an aptitude test:
KOMISIJA PROTI ŠPANIJI b) da zaključi prilagoditveno obdobje v trajanju največ 3 let ali da opravi preizkus usposobljenosti:
Article 1 of that royal decree is worded as follows:
Člen 1 tega kraljevega odloka določa:
‘Subject to the rights granted to those holding a degree in pharmacy, only the holders of the diploma of specialist pharmacist [‘farmacéutico especialista’] issued by the Minister for Education and Science can hold the title of specialist pharmacist, can pursue the profession as a specialist or occupy with that title a post in a public or private body.’
„Ob upo�tevanju pravic, priznanih farmacevtom, lahko le imetniki diplome farmacevta specialista [farmacéutico especialista], ki jo izda ministrstvo za izobraževanje in znanost, nosijo naziv farmacevta specialista, opravljajo poklic kot specialisti oziroma so lahko s tem nazivom zaposleni v javni ali zasebni ustanovi.“
Article 2 of that royal decree provides:
Člen 2 tega kraljevega odloka določa:
(b) have followed in full the corresponding specialised training course in accordance with the established study plans and programmes;
„Za pridobitev diplome farmacevta specialista so določeni ti pogoji: a) imeti mora diplomo farmacevta; b) opraviti mora celotno izobraževanje in usposabljanje ustrezne specializacije, skladno s �tudijskim načrtom in določenim programom; c) uspe�no mora opraviti ocenjevalne preizkuse, določene za to področje.“
Under Article 3 of Royal Decree 2708/1982:
Na podlagi člena 3 kraljevega odloka 2708/1982 velja:
‘The following specialisations shall be recognised as specialisations in pharmacy:
„Kot specializacije v farmaciji so priznane te specializacije:
First group. — Specialisations requiring primarily hospital training:
Prva skupina – Specializacije, za katere se zahteva zlasti bolni�nično izobraževanje in usposabljanje:
— Hospital pharmacy
– Bolni�nična farmacija
Directives 85/432 and 85/433 were transposed into national law by Royal Decree 1667/1989 of 22 December 1989 (BOE No 4 of 4 January 1990, p. 217).
Direktivi 85/432 in 85/433 sta bili v nacionalno pravo preneseni s kraljevim odlokom 1667/1989 z dne 22. decembra 1989 (BOE �t. 4 z dne 4. januarja 1990, str. 217).
Article 1 of that royal decree provides:
Člen 1 tega kraljevega odloka določa:
‘The diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications set out in Annex I to this royal decree and awarded to nationals of a Member State of the European Economic Community fulfilling the criteria set out in Annex II shall be recognised in Spain, for the purposes of access to the profession of pharmacist, as being equivalent to the official university diploma evidencing a degree in pharmacy.’
„Če diplome, spričevala in druga dokazila, na�teti v prilogi I k temu kraljevemu odloku, ki so bili podeljeni državljanom države članice Evropske gospodarske skupnosti, izpolnjujejo merila, določena v prilogi II, se priznajo v Španiji in imajo glede možnosti opravljanja poklica farmacevta enak učinek kakor uradna univerzitetna diploma farmacevta.“
The Spanish diploma referred to in Annex I to that royal decree is the same as that listed in the annex to Directive 85/433.
Španska diploma, povzeta v prilogi I h kraljevemu odloku, je enaka kot diploma iz priloge k Direktivi 85/433.
Article 2(1) of that royal decree provides:
Člen 2(1) tega kraljevega odloka določa:
‘The rules set out in this royal decree apply to nationals of a Member State of the European Union who, as holders of a diploma awarded in a State of that Union, wish to pursue in Spain, in a selfemployed capacity or as an employed person, a regulated profession the pursuit of which requires higher education of at least three years’ duration.’
„Pravila, na�teta v tem kraljevem odloku, se uporabljajo za državljane države članice Evropske unije, ki kot imetniki diplome, pridobljene v državi navedene unije, želijo v Španiji kot samozaposlene ali zaposlene osebe opravljati reguliran poklic, za opravljanje katerega se zahteva visoko�olska izobrazba in usposabljanje, ki traja najmanj tri leta.“
Article 3(a) of that royal decree provides that the ‘regulated professions’ are all the professions listed in Annex I to that decree.
Člen 3(a) tega kraljevega odloka določa, da so „regulirani poklici“ vsi poklici, ki so na�teti v prilogi I k navedenemu odloku.
That annex does not refer to the profession of hospital pharmacist.
V tej prilogi pa ni naveden poklic bolni�ničnega farmacevta.
In its reply of 17 March 2006, the Kingdom of Spain submitted that Directive 89/48 was not applicable to the profession of hospital pharmacist, that being a specialisation
Kraljevina Španija je v svojem odgovoru z dne 17. marca 2006 navedla, da se Direktiva 89/48 ne uporablja za poklic bolni�ničnega farmacevta, ker gre za specializacijo