natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The new Portuguese audit manual on the Structural and Cohesion Funds was approved. It outlines the methods to be employed by the IGF as the body responsible for drawing up the statement of validity when assistance that is co-financed from the funds is wound up.
Na Portugalskem je bil sprejet nov revizijski priro┘nik za strukturne sklade in kohezijski sklad; v njem so opredeljene metode, ki jih mora IGF uporabljati v svoji funkciji organa, imenovanega za izdajo izjav o veljavnosti ob zaklju┘ku razli┘nih oblik sofinanciranih inter-vencij.
Measures taken under the 2004«05 action plan
Ocena akcijskega naｲrta
The overall strategic approach 2001«05 (33) was followed by the Commission's action plan 2004«05 on the protection of financial interests and the fight against fraud (34).
Sploùnemu strateùkemu pristopu 2001«2005(33) je sledil akcijski na┘rt Komisije o zaù┘iti finan┘nih interesov in boju proti goljufijam za obdobje 2004«2005(34).
In 2004, the Commission delivered 11 of the 37 measures contained in this action plan for 2004«05.
Od 37 ukrepov, opredeljenih v zgoraj navedenem na┘rtu, jih je Komisija leta 2004 izvedla 11.
The most noteworthy were:
Med temi velja omeniti:
̋ proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the Community against fraud and any other illegal activities, in particular money laundering and VAT fraud (36) (see point 3.2);
« predlog Uredbe o medsebojni upravni pomo┘i za zaù┘ito finan┘nih interesov Skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi oblikami nezakonitega ravnanja, zlasti pranjem denarja in goljufijami, povezanimi z DDV(36) (glej to┘ko 3.2);
Communication from the Commission on protection of the Communities' financial interests, the fight against fraud, for an overall strategic approach, COM(2000) 358 final.Communication from the Commission on protection of the Communities' financial interests, the fight against fraud, action plan 2004«05, COM(2004) 544 final.COM(2004) 103 and 10 final.COM(2004) 509 final.
Sporo┘ilo Komisije o zaù┘iti finan┘nih interesov Skupnosti « Boj proti goljufijam: za sploùen strateùki pristop, COM(2000) 358 kon┘.Sporo┘ilo Komisije o zaù┘iti finan┘nih interesov Skupnosti « Boj proti goljufijam « Akcijski na┘rt 2004«2005, COM(2004) 544 kon┘.COM(2004) 103 in 104 kon┘.COM(2004) 509 kon┘.COM(2004) 709 kon┘.
38) on the protection of good grounds for pursuing the adoption of the draft directive (the Communities' financial interests.
Komisija meni, da je nadaljevanje sprejetja osnutka Direktive(38interesov Skupnosti utemeljeno.
Since it was set up, OLAF has made considerable efforts to reduce the length of prelimi-nary assessments and investigations.
OLAF si je od svoje ustanovitve znatno prizadeval skrajùati trajanje predhodnega ocenjeva-nja in preiskav.
The average length of assessments of information on suspected irregularities, which rose to 18 months in the period July 2000«June 2001 (39), fell to five months in 2003«04.
Po tem, ko se je povpre┘no trajanje ocenjevanja podatkov, povezanih s sumi nepravilnosti, v obdobju med julijem 2000 in junijem 2001(39)podaljùalo na 18 me- secev, se je v obdobju 2003«2004 ponovno skrajùalo na 5 mesecev.
The average length of investigations has been falling stead-ily since 1999 and is now around 22 months compared with 29 months five years ago.
Od leta 1999 se pov-pre┘no trajanje preiskav nenehno skrajùuje; danes trajajo p r i b l i Š n o 22 mesecev v primerja-vi z 29 meseci pred 5 leti.
Chart 2.4.2. ̋ Average length of assessments and investigations
Graf 2.4.2 › Povpreｲno trajanje ocenjevanj in preiskav
Average length of investigations
Povpreｲno trajanje preiskav
Average length of assessments
Povpreｲno trajanje ocenjevanj
The proportion of investigations closed with follow-up has increased to around one in two in the period July 2003«June 2004 compared with one in five in the period 1999«2000, most markedly as concerns judicial follow-up (almost one in three cases in 2003«04 com-pared with one case in 22 in 1999«2000) (40).
Bela knjiga o reformi Komisije(41) vsebuje vrsto ukrepov, namenjenih izboljùanju uporabe r a z p o l o Š l j i v e g a strokovnega znanja in izkuùenj, s ciljem u┘inkovitejùega prepre┘evanja ne-
COM(2004) 709.COM(2002) 577.During the period June 1999«July 2000, the average duration of the assessment phase was six months, but this period cannot be considered representative, because the implementation of new procedures took effect only in late 2000.
COM(2002) 577 kon┘.V obdobju julij 1999«junij 2000 je ocenjevanje v povpre┘ju trajalo 6 mesecev, vendar pa to obdobje ne more predstav-ljati vzorca, saj so novi postopki za┘eli veljati ùele konec leta 2000.
For more details concerning the Office's results, see the complementary evaluation of the activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office, SEC(2004) 1370.
Za ve┘ podrobnosti o rezultatih Urada glej dodatno oceno dejavnosti OLAF, SEC(2004) 1370.Reforma Komisije, Bela knjiga, to┘ka V3 dela I in to┘ka XXX dela II, COM(2000) 200 kon┘.Sporo┘ilo Komisije o onemogo┘anju goljufij prek zakonodaje in upravljanja s pogodbami z dne 7. novembra 2001, SEC(2001) 2029 kon┘.
A Commission communication (42) sets out a mechanism for consulting OLAF as far in advance as possible when submitting legislative proposals, to improve quality of legisla-tion.
1 9 deva mehanizem posvetovanja z OLAF na samem za┘etku postopka priprave zakonodajnih predlogov.
The communication also proposes that the Budget DG, in cooperation with OLAF, should take a series of preventive measures in the area of contract management.
Sporo┘ilo prav tako dolo┘a, da naj bi GD za prora┘un v sodelovanju z Uradom sprejel niz ukrepov prepre┘evanja na podro┘ju upravljanja s pogodbami.
The sys-tem came into operation in 2003.
Sistem je za┘el delovati leta 2003.
For 2004, 29 legislative measures programmed were identified as risk measures in terms of fraud proofing.
Med na┘rtovanimi zakonodajnimi ukrepi za leto 2004 je bilo ugotovljenih 29 ukrepov, ki so z vidika onemogo┘anja goljufij tvegani.
The Office has thus been able to contribute its operational experience in relation to the drafting of Community documents, such as the Green Paper on the future of preferential systems and the modernisation of the customs code, as well as more spe-cific regulations, such as a proposal to regulate mushroom quotas, or certificates of origin for garlic imported from third countries.
Urad je tako lahko prispeval svoje operativne izkuùnje pri pripravi dokumentov Skupnosti, zlasti Zelene knjige o prihodnosti preferenci-alnih r e Š i m o v in posodobitvi carinskega zakonika ter bolj posebnih uredb, kot sta predloga za ureditev kvot za gobe ali potrdil o poreklu za ┘esen, u v o Š e n iz tretjih d r Š a v .
In the area of direct expenditure, the new model memorandum of understanding for par-ticipation by the candidate countries in Community programmes will include clauses ensuring more effective protection of financial interests.
Na podro┘ju neposrednih izdatkov bo novi vzorec memoranduma o soglasju o sodelovanju d r Š a v kandidatk v programih Skupnosti vklju┘eval klavzule, ki bodo zagotavljale u┘in-kovitejùo zaù┘ito finan┘nih interesov.
COOPERATION IN AGRICULTURE AND CUSTOMS MATTERS
SODELOVANJE NA KMETIJSKEM IN CARINSKEM PODROPJU
The instrument for cooperation in agricultural and customs matters (43) lays down the conditions under which the customs and agricultural authorities of the Member States cooperate with one another and also with the Commission at the request of an applicant authority or spontaneously, to ensure, notably, the exercise of a special surveillance on persons, places, movements of goods and means of transportation, administrative inquir-ies, the providing of a document, etc.
Instrument za sodelovanje na kmetijskem in carinskem podro┘ju(43) dolo┘a pogoje, pod katerimi carinski in kmetijski organi d r Š a v ┘lanic na zahtevo organa prosilca ali prosto-voljno sodelujejo med seboj in s Komisijo zato, da zagotovijo izvajanje posebnega nadzora nad osebami, kraji, pretokom blaga in prevoznih sredstev, upravne poizvedbe, izdajo po-trdil itd.
The national authorities communicate to the Commission any relevant information concerning irregularities detected and suspected fraud, the meth-ods and the practices used, etc. (Article 17).
Uredba vzpostavlja sistem o b s e Š n e izmenjave podatkov, v okviru katerega nacionalni orga-ni Komisiji sporo┘ajo vse koristne podatke v zvezi z odkritimi nepravilnostmi in sumi go-ljufij, uporabljenimi na┘ini ter postopki itd. (┘len 17).
The regulation also makes provisions for mutual assistance with the authorities in third countries and the information from the Commission when this presents a particular interest (Articles 19 to 22).
Uredba prav tako predvideva med-sebojno pomo┘ med organi tretjih d r Š a v in obveù┘anje Komisije, ┘e ima to poseben pomen (┘leni 19 do 22).
The regulation established a customs information system (Articles 23 to 41) that enables information to be disseminated rapidly and makes the cooperation procedures more effi-cient (44).
Z Uredbo se vzpostavi carinski informacijski sistem (┘leni 23 do 41), ki omogo┘a hitro ùirjenje informacij in pove┘uje uspeùnost postopkov sodelovanja(44).
This year this subject was chosen by the Commission and the Member States as one of the central questions covered in the questionnaire.
Komisija in d r Š a v e ┘lanice so letos to temo uvrstile med poglavitna vpraùanja, vklju┘ena v vpraùalnik.
The following section gives an overview on the state of play in this area.
Naslednji oddelek vsebuje sploùen pregled p o l o Š a j a na tem podro┘ju.
Results of analysis of the contributions from the Member States (
Rezultati analize prispevkov dr™av ｲlanic(
While in general the implementation of the regulation is satisfactory, analyses shows that the quality of both Member State and Commission statistical data could be improved and that certain practical problems should be resolved.
Na sploùno je izvajanje Uredbe zadovoljivo. Iz analize izhaja, da bi se kakovost r a z p o l o Š l j i - v i h statisti┘nih podatkov na ravni d r Š a v ┘lanic in Komisije lahko izboljùala in da bi bilo treba odpraviti nekatere prakti┘ne t e Š a v e .
Statistics on communications.
Statisti┘ni podatki o sporo┘ilih.
Most Member States have encountered difficulties in sup-plying reliable and coherent statistics concerning the communications or reports request-ed.
Ve┘ina d r Š a v ┘lanic je imela t e Š a v e pri zagotavljanju za-nesljivih in doslednih statisti┘nih podatkov v zvezi s sporo┘ili ali poro┘ili.
The Member States have neither a centralised database for this type of information nor a uniform definition of the concept of `mutual assistance communication'.
Te ne razpolaga-jo s centralizirano podatkovno bazo za tovrstne informacije, pa tudi ne z enotno opredelit-vijo pojma ‡sporo┘anje podatkov o medsebojni pomo┘iƒ.
No analysis was therefore possible and examination of the figures was based merely on a quantitative ap-proach.
Te ùtevilke so bile prou┘ene le na podlagi kvantitativnega pristopa; nobena analiza ni bila m o Š na .
Also, there are no exploitable statistics on the number of communications and reports requested by or communicated to the Commission.
Prav tako niso na voljo statisti┘ni podatki, ki bi se lahko uporabili, v zvezi s ùtevilom sporo┘il in poro┘il, ki jih je Komisija zahtevala ali so ji bila poslana.
Improvement of the databases is desirable for use in risk analysis.
Da bi se podatkovne baze lahko uporabile pri ana-lizi tveganja, je za Š e l e n o njihovo izboljùanje.
Handling of request for mutual assistance.
Obravnava zahtevkov za medsebojno pomo┘.
Member States have reported problems, in particular response time, the quality and relevance of responses (or even the absence of any response, particularly from certain third countries) and translation problems.
D r Š a v e ┘lanice so opozorile na nekatere t e Š a v e , ki se nanaùajo zlasti na roke za odgovor, kakovost in ustreznost odgovorov (neka-tere tretje d r Š a v e celo ne odgovorijo) ter t e Š a v e s prevajanjem.
As a result, the time limit for instituting the proceedings in question sometimes expires.
Za┘eti ukrepi zaradi tega v┘asih zastarajo.
Most of the Member States regularly use reminders to speed up the procedure.
Ve┘ina d r Š a v ┘lanic redno poùilja opomine za pospeùitev postopka.
Regulation (EC) No 515/97, OJ L 82, 22.3.1997, supplemented by Commission Regulation (EC) No 696/98: OJ L 96, 28.3.1998, p.
Uredba (ES) ùt. 515/97, UL L 82, 22.3.1997, dopolnjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) ùt.
22.A third pillar instrument has been introduced to complete the system.
696/98, UL L 96, 28.3.1998.Ta sistem je bil dopolnjen z instrumentom iz tretjega stebra: ‡Konvencija Neapelj IIƒ, ki dolo┘a mehanizme medseboj-ne pomo┘i v okviru kazenskih preiskav glede krùitev nacionalne carinske zakonodaje in carinske zakonodaje Skupnosti.
The Naples II Convention lays down the arrangements for mutual assistance in the context of criminal investigations of infringements of Community and national customs regulations.
Dolo┘eno ùtevilo zadevnih preiskav predstavlja naravno nadaljevanje upravnih poizvedb, ki so se opravljale v skladu z Uredbo (ES) ùt. 515/97.
In 2004, 10 Member States (Belgium, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland,) ratified the Naples II Convention.
Leta 2004 je navedeno konvencijo ratificiralo deset d r Š a v ┘lanic (Avstrija, Belgija, Ciper, Mad-Šarska, Latvija, Litva, Portugalska, Finska, Slovenija, Slovaùka).
A further two (Czech Republic, Estonia) ratified it at the beginning of 2005.
Dve d r Š a v i ┘lanici (ﾚeùka, Estonija) sta jo ratificirali na za┘etku leta 2005.
At the time this report was drafted, only three Member States had not yet deposited their instrument of ratification.All the answers by Member States can be consulted in the working document (SEC(2005) 973) relating to the report, since the report gives only a very summarised overview.
Ob pripravi tega poro┘ila samo tri d r Š a v e ┘lanice ùe niso deponirale svoje listine o ratifikaciji.Vsi odgovori d r Š a v ┘lanic so na voljo v delovnem dokumentu, p r i l o Š e n e m poro┘ilu, (SEC(2005) 973); poro┘ilo vsebuje le kratek povzetek pregleda.Predlagana je bila sklenitev sporazumov z naslednjimi d r Š a v a m i : Albanijo, Armenijo, Belorusijo, Bosno in Hercegovi-no, Kanado, Kitajsko, Hrvaùko, Z d r u Š e n i m i arabskimi emirati, Indonezijo, Japonsko, Laosom, Malezijo, Panamo, Ro-munijo, Rusijo, Srbijo in ﾚrno goro, Singapurom, Tajvanom, Tajsko, Tunizijo, Vietnamom, ‡ d r Š a v a m i B l i Š n je g a vzho-daƒ, ‡ d r Š a v a m i Balkanaƒ, ‡ d r Š a v a m i Severne Afrikeƒ, ‡ d r Š a v a m i jugovzhodne Azijeƒ. Za┘ela sta veljati sporazum o sodelovanju, podpisan 20. oktobra 2004 z Indijo, in sporazum, podpisan 26. marca 2001 z Mehiko.
Although the Commission updates and distributes the contact list during each mutual assistance committee meeting (two or three times a year), it has been reported that sometimes it is difficult to determine the competent authority in a third country in a Member State (when a request is sent by a third country).
┘lanice (┘e zahtevek poùlje tretja d r Š a v a ) , ┘eprav Komisija ob vsakem sestanku odbora za medsebojno pomo┘ (dvakrat ali trikrat na leto) posodobi in razdeli seznam s kontaktnimi podatki.
Handling of fraud risk messages.
Obravnava sporo┘il o tveganju goljufij.
Member States are required (47) to inform the Commission of risks of fraud or other irregularities that are of particular relevance at Community level, and the Commission conveys this information to other Member States.
D r Š a v e ┘lanice sporo┘ijo Komisiji tveganja golju-fij ali drugih nepravilnosti, ┘e imajo slednje poseben pomen na ravni Skupnosti, Komisija pa te informacije sporo┘i drugim zadevnim d r Š a v a m ┘lanicam(47).
In some Member States, there are two or more competent administrations for the application of customs legislation; messages are then handled in the same way as other requests for mu-tual assistance; a central coordinating unit or office generally receives the message and conducts an initial analysis of it in order to determine which competent authority should deal with it (48).
Nekatere d r Š a v e ┘lanice imajo dva ali ve┘ organov, pristojnih za izvajanje carinske zakonodaje, vendar se ta sporo-┘ila obravnavajo na enak na┘in kot drugi zahtevki za medsebojno pomo┘: sporo┘ilo pravi-loma prejme centralna enota ali urad za usklajevanje in ga predhodno analizira, da dolo┘i organ, pristojen za njegovo obravnavo(48).
The results are conveyed to the Commission (OLAF) by the coordinating unit/office.
Enota/urad za usklajevanje poùlje morebitne rezultate Komisiji (OLAF).
Necessity of a judicial authorisation. Where the consent of the judicial authority is re-quired to implement a measure needed to handle a request for mutual assistance, the in-formation thus obtained is conveyed to the requesting Member State (49).
Potreba po dovoljenju sodnega organa. ﾚe se za izvajanje ukrepa, ki je potreben za ob-ravnavo zahtevka za medsebojno pomo┘, zahteva odobritev sodnega organa, se tako prido-bljena informacija poùlje d r Š a v i prosilki(49).
An additional judicial authorisation may be necessary for the transmission of information.
Za posredovanje informacij se lahko zahteva dodatno dovoljenje sodnega organa.
Member States differ widely as to which types of investigative measures require authorisation from the judicial authority; in particular, the customs authorities have more extensive powers of administrative inquiry.
D r Š a v e ┘lanice se med seboj zelo razlikujejo glede vrste preiskovalnih ukrepov, ki zahtevajo dovoljenje sodnega organa; zlasti glede pristojno-sti za upravne poizvedbe carinskih organov.
Generally speaking, however, each time such an authorisation is required to take an investigative measure, it is also required in order to send the report to the requesting Member State (50).
Vendar pa se ob vsaki zahtevi za dovoljenje za opravljanje preiskovalnega ukrepa zahteva dodatno dovoljenje za posredovanje poro┘ila d r Š a v i prosilki(50).
Certain Member States also impose additional require-ments, not laid down in the regulation, for transmitting the data obtained.
Za prenos pridobljenih podatkov nekatere d r Š a v e ┘lanice dolo┘ajo tudi dodatne pogoje, ki niso predvideni v Uredbi.
Treatment of reports submitted following a mission in a third country.
Obravnava poro┘il, ki se p r e d l o Š i j o po misiji v tretji d r Š a v i .
Following a Community mission in a third country, a report, countersigned by those taking part in the mission, and the supporting documentation which could be used as evidence, are sent to the Member States concerned even if they have not taken part in the mission (51).
Po zaklju┘ku misije v tretji d r Š a v i se zadevnim d r Š a v a m ┘lanicam, ┘eprav se misije niso u d e l e Š i l e , poùlje poro┘ilo, ki ga sopodpiùejo u d e l e Š e n c i misije, in dokumenti, ki se lahko uporabijo kot dokazi(51).
The Commission wished to know if the reports and documentation could be used as evidence in a recovery procedure before a national court, whether the Member State took part in the mission or not.
Komisi- ja je hotela vedeti, ali se lahko poslana poro┘ila in dokumenti uporabijo kot dokazi v po-stopku izterjave pred nacionalnim sodiù┘em, ne glede na to, ali se je d r Š a v a ┘lanica udele-Šila misije.
The Member States replied in the affirmative.
D r Š a v e ┘lanice so na to vpraùanje odgovorile pritrdilno.
However, there may be dif-ficulties with the evidence in a recovery procedure in a Member State that has not taken part in the mission in cases where the third country has not signed the report, something which is not required by the Community regulation.
V kolikor pa organi tretje d r Š a v e (katerih podpis po zakonodaji Skupnosti ni obvezen) ne podpiùejo tega poro-┘ila, lahko v postopku, s p r o Š e n e m v d r Š a v i ┘lanici, ki se misije ni u d e l e Š i l a , nastanejo t e Š a - v e glede dokazovanja.
Statistics on follow-up of cases reported.
Statisti┘ni podatki o nadaljnjem spremljanju sporo┘enih primerov.
Communication of the administrative and judi-cial decisions on reported cases is obligatory (52).
Sporo┘anje upra-vnih in sodnih odlo┘b v zvezi s primeri, ki so bili sporo┘eni v skladu z Uredbo, je obvezno(52). ﾚeprav ve┘ d r Š a v ┘lanic na┘rtuje vzpostavitev s l u Š b , pristojnih za nadaljnje spremlja- nje sporo┘enih primerov in pripravo statisti┘nih podatkov, ve┘ina d r Š a v trenutno nima sistema za centralizirano upravljanje teh informacij, pridobljeni statisti┘ni podatki pa so nepopolni in nezanesljivi.
Although several Member States plan to
Odstotek odlo┘b, ki se nanaùajo na organizirani kriminal, je zelo nizek.
It has been suggested that agreements be concluded with the following countries: Albania, Armenia, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, China, Croatia, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Panama, Romania, Russia, Serbia and Montenegro, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, the countries of the Middle East, the Balkan countries, the north African countries and the countries of south-east Asia.
ﾚlen 18 Uredbe (ES) 515/97. Na Poljskem je Urad za mednarodne odnose finan┘nega ministrstva poglavitni sogovornik Komisije, vendar pa je treba v dolo┘enem ùtevilu primerov kontaktirati tudi carinske organe.
The cooperation agreements signed with India (20.10.2004) and Mexico (26.3.2001) came into force.Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 515/97.In Poland, the Bureau for International Treasury Relations is the main correspondent of the Commission, but the customs authorities must also be contacted in a certain number of cases.
Obe s l u Š b i spadata pod Ministrstvo za finance.ﾚlen 3 Uredbe (ES) 515/97.
Both services are departments of the Ministry of Finance.Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 515/95.With the exception of France, Poland and Slovakia concerning customs investigations.Article 20 of the regulation.Article 49 of the regulation, generally made through the OWNRES system.
Z izjemo Poljske, Slovaùke in Francije za carinske poizvedbe.ﾚlen 20 Uredbe.ﾚlen 49; praviloma se izvaja na podlagi sistema OWNRES.
Measures taken by the Commission in 2004
Ukrepi, ki jih je Komisija sprejela leta 2004
Stepping up cooperation in agricultural and customs matters.
Izboljùanje sodelovanja na kmetijskem in carinskem podro┘ju.
Following the thematic report of the Budget DG on the handling of mutual assistance messages (53), the Commis- sion consulted the Member States and confirmed the need to:
Na podlagi tematskega poro┘ila GD za prora┘un o obravnavi sporo┘il o medsebojni pomo┘i(53) se je Komisija po- svetovala z d r Š a v a m i ┘lanicami in potrdila, da je treba:
̋ reinforce the efficiency of working methods by faster and more modern exchange and follow-up of information;
« pove┘ati u┘inkovitost delovnih metod s sodobnejùo in hitrejùo izmenjavo in spremlja-njem informacij;
̋ foster a better cooperative environment between the tools of detection, investigation and prosecution (articulation between mutual assistance sheets, CIS (54) and
« zagotoviti okolje, ki bi bilo bolj naklonjeno medsebojnemu delovanju orodij za odkri-vanje, preiskovanje in pregon (povezave med obrazci za medsebojno pomo┘, SID(54) in
In 2004, a feasibility study was conducted with a view to creating an electronic message: `Mutual assistance/fraud communication'.
Leta 2004 se je za┘ela izdelava ùtudije o izvedljivosti za pripravo elektronskega sporo┘ila ‡Medsebojna pomo┘ (MP)/Sporo┘anje goljufijƒ.
Extension of cooperation to other areas.
Razùiritev sodelovanja na druga podro┘ja.
On 20 July 2004, the Commission submitted a proposal for a Parliament and Council regulation on mutual administrative assist-ance (56).
Komisija je 20. julija 2004 Evropskemu parla-mentu in Svetu p r e d l o Š i l a predlog Uredbe o medsebojni upravni pomo┘i(56).
The proposed regulation could provide a more detailed legislative framework in the fight against fraud and encourages cooperation with and coordination by the Commission, par-ticularly OLAF.
Predlagana uredba naj bi zagotavljala podrobnejùo pravno podlago v boju proti goljufijam ter na ravni Skupnosti spodbujala sodelovanje in usklajevanje s Komisijo, zlasti z OLAF.