natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(a) the estimates of water needs underpinning co-financedin-frastructure projects were based on well-founded assumptions about the evolution of demand and water availability inthe area concerned;
(a) so ocene potreb po vodi, na katerih temeljijo sofinancirani projektiizgradnjeinfrastrukture,izdelane na podlagi dobro utemeljenih predpostavk orazvoju povpraševanjain dostopnosti vode na zadevnih območjih;
(b)various potentialsolutions,including actionto affect demand orto maintain orimprovethe quality ofthe water resources currently used, had been adequately analysedin ordertoselectthe best one;
(b)so bilerazlične mogočerešitve, vključnoz ukrepiza vpli-vanjenapovpraševanjealizaohranjanjealiizboljšanje kakovostiobstoječihvodnihvirov,ustreznoanalizirane, daseizbere najboljša;
(c) theauthoritiesinchargeofassessingapplicationsand approvinggrantshaveaddedvaluetotheprojectspro-posed.
(c) so organi,zadolženiza oceno vlogza donacijein njihovo odobritev, predlaganim projektom dodali vrednost.
IN ALMOST ALL CASES, FORECASTS OF NEEDS DID NOT TAKEINTO ACCOUNT DOWNWARD TRENDSIN PER CAPITA WATER CONSUMPTION, ANDIN SOME CASES, NOT ALL RESOURCES ALREADY AVAILABLE WERE CONSIDERED
V SKORAJ NOBENI NAPOVEDI POTREB NI BIL UPOŠTEVAN TREND ZMANJŠEVANJA PORABE VODE NA PREBIVALCA, V NEKATERIH PRIMERIH PA NITI VSI ŽE DOSTOPNI VIRI
11 Temporary (transient) population refers to tourists, commuting and seasonal workers, i.e. all nonresident persons.
11 Izraz začasna (prehodna) populacija se nanaša na turiste, vozače in sezonske delavce, tj. vse osebe, ki na določenem območju nimajo stalnega prebivališča.
12 For example, in four big cities, the downward trend in per capita
12 V štirih velikih mestih na primer je trend zmanjševanja porabe
consumption is so sharp that, despite population increase, the overall water consumption has decreased between 1 % and 29 % since the end of the 1990s.
V21primerihjebiloprihodnjepovpraševanjeocenjenona podlagiteoretične porabe na prebivalca, priporočene v doku-mentihzanačrtovanjeupravljanjazvodnimiviri,sajni bilo podatkov o pretekli porabiinizgubahiz omrežja.
In a densely populated coastal area, the same trend has been observed since the early 2000s. Eight projects examined are located in these areas.
Tako ocenjeno povpraševanjeje bilovčasih prilagojeno navzgor,insicer z uporaborazličnih dejavnikov, kijihjetežko ovrednotiti, kot sta učinek začasnih populacij11instopnjaindustrializacije.
In 21 cases, demand was estimated on the basis of theoretical percapitaconsumptionrecommended by hydrological planning documents, giventhelack of data onconsumptionand losses from the networksin the past.
vode na prebivalca tako močen, da se je skupna poraba vode kljub povečanju populacije od konca­1990-ih zmanjšala za od 1­% do 29­%.
13 Improvements in the networks result in reduced losses. Losses are
13 Zaradi izboljšav v omrežju so se zmanjšale izgube, ki se štejejo za
considered as being part of the demand as they need to be covered by the total water production.
del povpraševanja, ker jih je treba pokriti pri pridobivanju vode.
14 See also communication from the Commission‘Addressing the
14 Glej tudi Sporočilo Komisije „Obravnavanje izziva pomanjkanja
In the other five cases, water demand forecasts were estimated onthe basis of dataaboutreal pastconsumption, butapply-ing different methods.Inthree ofthesecases,the percapita consumption used tojustify the needfor the projectis higher thantheonerecommendedbyhydrologicalplanningdocu-ments.
V ostalih petih primerihso bile napovedi povpraševanja ocenjene na podlagi podatkov o dejanski pretekli porabi, vendar so se uporabljale različne metode. V treh od teh petih primerov je poraba na prebivalca, s kateroje bila utemeljena potreba po izvedbi projekta,višja od priporočenev dokumentihza načrtovanje upravljanja z vodnimi viri.
Moreover,inalmostalltheprojects,thedemandestimates do notreflectthe downwardtrendin per capita consumption and, sometimes,in waterlosses that has taken place since the end of the 1990s or early 2000sin most of the areas concerned challenge of water scarcity and droughts in the European Union’, COM(2007) 414 final and final report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the ‘Follow-up to the communication on water scarcity and droughts in the European Union’, COM(2008) 875.
vode in suše v Evropski uniji“, COM(2007) 414 konč., in končno poročilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu „Poročilo o spremljanju Sporočila o­pomanjkanju vode in suši v­Evropski uniji“, COM(2008) 875.
This trendis a result ofimprovementsin the networks13, theinstallation of domestic meters and awareness campaigns promoted by waterauthoritiesand operators.
, namestitve gospodinjskih vodomerovin kampanj za ozaveščanje, ki sojih spodbujali organiin upravljavci, pristojni za oskrbo z vodo.
As the implementation of such demand side measures is becoming more widespread, anincreasingtrend of per capita consump-tionis unlikely14.
Ker se vedno boljizvajajo takšni ukrepi v zvezi s povpraševanjem, ni verjetno, dase bo poraba vode na prebivalca večala14.
15 The most recent data available at the time of the audit.
15 Najnovejši podatki, ki so bili na­voljo v času revizije.
As a result, a comparison betweenforecasts offuture demand and actual consumption very often shows that(see Table 2for some examples): actual per capita consumption in 200815
Zatosepriprimerjavinapovediprihodnjegapovpraševanja in dejanske porabe pogosto pokaže, da(glej Tabelo 2,kjerje navedenih nekaj primerov):
(a) issignificantly lower than the estimate for the horizon year, andin several cases,itis evenlessthan half ofthis estimate;
(a) je bila dejanska poraba na prebivalca vletu 200815 bistveno manjša,kotje biloocenjenozakonecnačrtovalnega obdobja,v nekaj primerih pajecelozavečkot polovico manjša od ocenjene;
(b)actualoverallconsumptionin2008is muchlowerthan estimated.
(b)je bila dejanska skupna poraba vletu 2008 veliko manjša, kotje bilo ocenjeno.
WATER CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES AND ACTUAL VALUESIN 2008 FOR SOME PROJECTS EXAMINED
OCENE PORABE VODEIN DEJANSKE VREDNOSTIIZ LETA 2008 ZANEKAJ PREGLEDANIH PROJEKTOV
Overall consumption in hm
Poraba na prebivalca v l/dan
Per capita consumption inl/day
Skupna poraba v hm
Estimated ex-ante
Predhodna ocena
Estimated ex-ante for the
Predhodna ocena za konec načrto-
Horizon year in 2008 1 horizon year 1
Konec načrtovalnega obdobja vletu 20081 valnega obdobja1
For 20082
Za leto 20082
In 2008
V letu 2008
For the horizon year
Za konec načrtovalnega obdobja
8,5 no data
8,5 ni podatka
Per capita consumption includes peaks, losses and industrial coefficient.
V porabo na prebivalca so zajeti obdobja največje porabe, izgube in industrijski koeficient.
The overall consumption estimates for 2008 were indicated in the project studies or calculated by the Court on the basis of population and per capita consumption trends shown in these studies.
Splošne ocene porabe za leto 2008 so bile navedene v projektnih študijah ali pa jih je na osnovi populacije in trenda, ki so ga za porabo na prebivalca pokazale študije, izračunalo Sodišče.
Resources already available were notfullytakeninto account in the design of new infrastructure in six cases (see Box 2).
V šestih primerih se že dostopni viri niso popolnoma upoštevali pri načrtovanju noveinfrastrukture (glej Okvir 2).
Inparticular, where water wasofpoorquality,forexample because of high nitrates orsulphatescontent,it was notex-amined whetherthis water could have been mixed with water of good qualityin orderto meettheregulatorystandardsfor drinking water,instead of beingfullyreplaced by waterfrom anothersource16.
Predvsem na območjih z vodo slabe kakovosti, na primer zaradi visoke vsebnosti nitratov ali sulfatov, ni bilo preverjeno, alije mogočeto vodo mešati z vodo dobre kakovosti, da biizpolnili predpisane standardezapitnovodo,namestodasevcelotinadomesti z­vodoiz drugega vira16.
substances as sulphate and nitrate salts in water intended for human consumption.
16 Direktiva 98/83/ES določa posamezne vrednosti parametrov za snovi, kot so nitratne in sulfatne soli, v vodi, namenjeni za prehrano ljudi.
When the salt concentration exceeds these values, it is common practice to dilute the water with other (available) water from low salinity sources.
Ko koncentracija soli preseže te vrednosti, se vodo običajno razredči z drugo (dostopno) vodo iz virov z­nizko slanostjo.
A better estimation offuture demand and water deficits could have madeit possibleto consider alternativesolutions which were nottakeninto account and buildsmallercapacityinfra-structure.
Boljša ocena prihodnjega povpraševanjain primanjkljaja vode bi omogočila razmislek o alternativnih rešitvah, ki se niso upo-števale,inizgradnjoinfrastrukture z manjšo zmogljivostjo.
EXAMPLES OF PROJECTS WHERE AVAILABLE RESOURCES WERE IGNOREDIN THE PLANNING PHASE
PRIMERA PROJEKTOV, PRI KATERIH SE V NAČRTOVALNI FAZI NISO UPOŠTEVALI ŽE DOSTOPNI VIRI
In Spain, the ERDF cofinanced a project to improve the quality of water supplied to various neighbouring municipalities, as current water supply did not comply with regulatory parameters.
ESRR je v Španiji sofinanciral projekt za izboljšanje kakovosti vode za oskrbo različnih bližnjih občin, ker obstoječa oskrba z vodo ni bila v skladu s predpisanimi parametri.
The estimates of water volume to be provided by the new infrastructures were based upon the estimate of total future demand for the area.
Ocene količine vode, ki bi jo bilo treba zagotoviti s pomočjo nove infrastrukture, so temeljile na oceni skupnega prihodnjega povpraševanja za celotno območje.
Nevertheless, some of the municipalities had water of excellent quality and experienced no shortages.
Vendar so imele nekatere občine zelo kakovostno vodo, ki je ni nikoli zmanjkalo.
Furthermore, the project could have been based on the estimate of the volume of good quality water required to achieve the appropriate mix with the low quality water already available.
Poleg tega bi projekt lahko temeljil na oceni potrebne količine vode dobre kakovosti, da se pridobi primerna mešanica z vodo slabe kakovosti, ki je že na voljo.
Four years after commissioning, the rate of use of the new capacity is around 16 %.
Štiri leta po začetku obratovanja znaša stopnja uporabe novih zmogljivosti okoli 16 %.
13,9 hm3/year, without considering the resources that were already available (8 hm3/year).
V drugem primeru, ki ga je v Španiji sofinanciral Kohezijski sklad, je bil zgrajen jez za zadovoljitev prihodnjega povpraševanja, ki je bilo ocenjeno na 13,9 hm3 na leto, ne da bi pri tem upoštevali že dosto- pne vire (8 hm3 na leto).
At the time of the audit, this dam was not necessary to cover the current demand of the area (8 hm3/year) as available resources were already sufficient.
V času revizije jez za zadovoljevanje trenutnega povpraševanja na zadevnem območju ni bil potreben (8 hm3 na leto), ker so zadostovali že dostopni viri.
The cofinanced infrastructure will be used as a reserve or for other areas and not as initially planned.
Sofinancirana infrastruktura bo uporabljena kot rezerva za druga območja in ne za prvotni namen.
THE FOCUSIS ON BUILDINGINFRASTRUCTURES TO EXPLOIT NEW WATER SOURCES AND ATTENTION IS RARELY PAID TO OTHER SOLUTIONS, SUCH AS REDUCING WATER LOSSES,...
POUDAREKJE NAIZGRADNJIINFRASTRUKTURE ZA IZKORIŠČANJE NOVIH VODNIH VIROV, POZORNOST PA SE REDKO NAMENI DRUGIM REŠITVAM, KOT STA ZMANJŠEVANJEIZGUBE VODE …
17 Moreover, it should be stressed that the transport of water over a
17 Poudariti je treba tudi dejstvo, da je prenos vode na razdaljah,
Inallthecases examined bythe Court,thesolutionselected to tackle the estimated water deficit was to exploit new water sources andtransportthe watertothe areas concerned17
V vseh primerih, kijihje pregledalo Sodišče,je bilaizbrana rešitev za spopadanje z ocenjenim primanjkljajem vode izkorišča- nje novih vodnih virovin prenos vode na zadevna območja17
distance higher than 100 km is very costly.
daljših od 100 km, zelo drag.
Besides the high investment cost, the operating cost represents up to 50 % of the total cost of the water supply (A. Gee, EC Competition Policy Newsletter No 2, summer 2004).
Poleg visokih naložbenih stroškov, obratovalni stroški predstavljajo do 50 % skupnega stroška oskrbe z­vodo (A.­Gee, EC Competition Policy Newsletter, št.­2, poleti 2004).
Where thelevel of noninvoiced water was high, the possibility ofimprovingthe distribution networks wasrarely considered as a means ofreducingfuture water needs,thereby excluding potentialsmaller capacitysolutions(see Box 3).
Kjerje bila količina nezaračunane vode velika, seje za zmanjševanje prihodnjih potreb povodiredko upoštevala možnost izboljšavedistribucijskihomrežij,sčimersobileizključene potencialnerešitve manjše zmogljivosti(glej okvir 3).
Intwo cases, however, municipalities havetaken actiontore-duce demand.Inthese cases,theresults have been so significant that the co-financedinfrastructure has become unneces-saryintheshortterm oris oversized(see Box 4).
V dveh primerih pa sta občini sprejeli ukrepe za zmanjševanje povpraševanja. V obeh so bilirezultatitako dobri, da sofinan-ciranainfrastruktura kratkoročno sploh ni potrebna alije pre-velika(glej okvir 4).
POTENTIALIMPACT OF REDUCING NONINVOICED WATER ON WATER NEEDS
POTENCIALNI UČINEK ZMANJŠEVANJA KOLIČIN NEZARAČUNANE VODE NA POTREBE PO VODI
The increase in the volume of water made available to an Italian city, which was one of the objectives of a cofinanced project, could have been achieved by reducing noninvoiced water in the city water network from 44,5 % to 11,5 %, which is an achievable rate already reached in some sectors of that city.
Povečanje količine vode, dostopne nekemu italijanskemu mestu, kar je bil eden od ciljev sofinanciranega projekta, bi se lahko doseglo z zmanjšanjem količine nezaračunane vode s 44,5 % na 11,5 %, kar je izvedljiva stopnja, ki so jo že izvedli v nekaterih delih tega mesta.
For a bulk water supply infrastructure in Greece, the design of the project was based on future demand estimates, including a high water loss rate (30 %).
Za infrastrukturo za množično oskrbo z vodo v Grčiji je načrt projekta temeljil na ocenjenem prihodnjem povpraševanju, v katerega je bila vključena tudi višja stopnja izgube vode (30 %).
Despite some investment to improve the distribution network, also cofinanced with EU funds, the loss rate remains around 30 %.
Kljub nekaterim naložbam v izboljšanje distribucijskega omrežja, ki so bile sofinancirane s sredstvi EU, ostaja izguba približno 30-odstotna.
Effective action to reduce water losses would have resulted in the need for a smaller new water supply infrastructure.
Če bi uvedli uspešne ukrepe za zmanjševanjeizgub vode, bi bila potrebna manjša nova infrastruktura za oskrbo z vodo.
There can be competing demands on water resources between, for example,the needs of agriculture and domestic consumption.
Povpraševanje povodnihvirihjelahkovčasihkonkurenčno, čejevoda na primer namenjena potrebamkmetijstvain gospodinjski porabi.
The possibility of using water resources reserved for agricultural use for human consumption has not been explored for the projects examined (see Box 5).
Pri pregledanih projektih možnost uporabe vodnihvirov,kisosicerrezerviranizakmetijstvo,za prehra-noljudi ni bilaraziskana(glej okvir 5).
Nonetheless, good practices have been noted in some Spanish regions, whereaflexible exchangesystemregarding water usagerightsisin place,so that waterintendedforirrigation can be used to supply water for domestic consumption when needed.
Sodiščejekljubtemu v­nekaterih španskih regijah opazilo dobre prakse, kjerje vzpostavljen prilagodljivsistemizmenjavevzvezis pravicami do uporabevode,tako daselahkovodo,kije namenjenaza namakanje, po potrebi uporabi za oskrbo gospodinjstev.
EXAMPLES OF BENEFICIARY MUNICIPALITIES HAVING TAKEN ACTION TO REDUCE WATER LOSSES
PRIMERI UPRAVIČENIH OBČIN, KI SO SPREJELE UKREPE ZA ZMANJŠANJEIZGUB VODE
The CF cofinanced the construction of a dam so as to provide 34 hm3/year of water to a Spanish city and its surrounding area. This dam was justified on the basis of an estimated demand of 158 hm3/year by 2012.
Kohezijski skladje sofinanciral gradnjojezu, ki naj bi nekemu španskemu mestuin okolici zagotovil 34­hm3 vode naleto.Izgradnjajezujetemeljila na ocenjenem povpraševanju doleta 2012, ki naj bi znašalo 158 hm3 vode na leto.
At the same time the city drew up an action plan including the installation of individual meters in apartments and the improvement of the transport and distribution network.
Mesto je hkrati pripravilo akcijski načrt, ki je vključeval namestitev vodomerov v stanovanjih ter izboljšanje prenosa vode in distribucijskega omrežja.
This was also a condition imposed by the Commission when it approved the grant in 2000.
Ta pogoj je postavila tudi Komisija pri odobritvi donacije leta 2000.
The action plan achieved better results than those required by the Commission: noninvoiced water is currently around 20 % compared to 36 % beforehand.
Akcijski načrt je dosegel boljše rezultate, kot jih je zahtevala Komisija: delež nezaračunane vode zdaj znaša okoli 20 % v primerjavi s prejšnjimi 36 %.
For another Spanish city,the CF cofinanced a bulk water supply system.
Za drugo špansko mestoje Kohezijski sklad sofinanciral sistem množične oskrbe z vodo.
The project estimatedthe city’sfuture demand at 113 hm3
Pri projektu je bilo prihodnje povpraševanje za to mesto ocenjeno na 113 hm3.
50 % to 30 %. Though the population has increased, overall demand has decreased from 81 hm3 in 1996 to 61 hm3 in 2008.
Čeprav se je število prebivalcev povečalo, se je skupno povpraševanje zmanjšalo z 81 hm3 leta 1996 na 61 hm3 leta 2008.
THE USE OF NEARBY WATER RESOURCES
UPORABA BLIŽNJIH VODNIH VIROV
In the areas corresponding to two cofinanced projects in Spain, several municipalities were distributing water with a nitrate content significantly higher than the maximum set by the drinking water quality directive, due to contamination from agriculture.
Na območjih, ki jih pokrivata dva sofinancirana projekta v Španiji, je več občin distribuiralo vodo z bistveno višjo vsebnostjo nitratov, kot je največja dovoljena vrednost v direktivi o kakovosti pitne vode, kar je bilo posledica kmetijskega onesnaževanja.
The possibility of using nearby good quality surface water for domestic consumption, instead of poor quality water, was not considered by the project promoter because the usage rights of this good quality water had been granted to farmers.
Nosilec projekta ni upošteval možnosti uporabe bližnje kakovostne površinske vode za gospodinjsko uporabo namesto vode slabe kakovosti, ker so imeli pravice za uporabo te kakovostne vode kmetje.
For each project, underground water wells and transport pipes of about 50 kminlength were built.
Za vsak projekt so bili zgrajeni podzemni vodnjaki in približno 50 km dolge cevi za prenos.
However,for one of these projects, the authoritiesin charge of water management had not yet granted an abstraction permit and requested the local authorities to look for a solution to make it possible to use surface water reserved for farmers.
Vendar za enega od teh projektov pristojni organi še niso izdali dovoljenja za črpanje vode, od lokalnih organov pa so zahtevali, naj poiščejo rešitev, ki bi omogočila uporabo površinske vode, rezervirane za kmete.
This would, however, require additional infrastructure to be constructed.
Vendar bi bilo za to treba zgraditi dodatno infrastrukturo.
LIMITED VALUE WAS ADDED BY THE GRANT APPLICATIONS’ APPRAISAL BY THE COMMISSION AND THE MEMBER STATES’ MANAGING AUTHORITIES
OCENJEVANJE VLOG ZA DONACIJE, KI SO GA IZVEDLI KOMISIJAIN ORGANI UPRAVLJANJA DRŽAV ČLANIC,JE PRINESLO OMEJENO DODANO VREDNOST
The audit sample includes nine CF projects and two ERDF major projects which were examinedandapproved bythe Commission.
V revizijski vzorecje bilo zajetih devet projektov Kohezijskega skladain dva velika projekta ESRR, kijihje preučilain odobrila Komisija.
The other 18 projects were cofinanced bythe ERDF and wereapproved bythe Member States’ managingauthorities (see paragraph 8).
Ostalih 18 projektovje sofinanciral ESRR, odobrili pa sojih organi upravljanja držav članic(glej odstavek 8).
18 See in particular paragraph 41 of Special Report No 3/2009 concerning the eectiveness of structural measures spending on waste water treatment for the 1994–99 and 2000–06 programme periods.
ukrepov za čiščenje odpadne vode za programski obdobji 1994–1999 in­2000–2006.
19 Council Directive 91/676/ECC of 12 December 1991 concerning
19 Direktiva Sveta 91/676/EGS z­dne­12. decembra 1991 o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati
As already foundin other Court reports18, the absence of guidance and checklistsfor assessing the grant applicationsin the 2000–06 programme period meantthatit was not possibleto identifythe checks carried out bythe Commission.
Kotje Sodišče ugotovilo že v drugih poročilih18, zaradi pomanjkanja navodilinkontrolnihseznamovza ocenjevanjevlogza donacijev programskem obdobju2000–2006 ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti, katere pregledejeizvedla Komisija.
the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates and Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment.
in Direktiva Sveta 91/271/EGS z dne 21. maja 1991 o čiščenju komunalne odpadne vode.
In no cases did the Commission question the forecasts of future demand or the solutions chosen; nor didit askforinformation about other potentialsolutions,such as accessing ortreating wateravailable nearbyratherthanextractingitfromfurther away.
Komisijav nobenem primeru ni podvomilav napovedi prihodnjega povpraševanjaaliizbranerešitve niti ni prosilazain-formacije o drugih mogočih rešitvah, kotje dostop do bližnjih vodnih virov ali čiščenje vodeizteh virov namesto črpanja na bolj oddaljenihlokacijah.
Followingitsreview,the Commissionimposedconditions on four projects,relatingtothereduction of waterlosses.
Komisijaje po pregledu za štiri projekte postavila pogoje, ki so se nanašali na zmanjšanjeizgub vode.
How-ever,in onecasethe Commission did not quantifythe objec-tivesconcerned;inanothercase,thedeadlinesfor meeting them were setfor afterthe completion date ofthe project, by whichtimethe balance ofthe grant would have been paid.In no case was the effect of the required reductionin waterlosses takeninto accountinthe calculation of water needs.
Vendar v enem primeru ni količinsko opredelila ciljev, v drugem primeru paje kotrok za doseganjetehciljev določila datum pozaključku projekta, ko bi bilaizplačana že celotna donacija. V nobenem primeru pri izračunu potreb po vodi ni bilo upoštevano zahtevano zmanj-šanjeizgub vode.
Intwooftheseprojects,thegrantdecisionalsoincludeda provision to the effect that the authorities had to monitor the application ofthe directives onthe protection ofsurface and underground waters19andinformthe CF Monitoring Committee.
Pridvehodtehprojektovjesklepodonacijivsebovaltudi določbo o tem, da morajo organi nadzorovati uporabo direktiv o­varstvu površinskihvodain podtalnice19ter obveščati nadzorni odbor za Kohezijski sklad.
These provisions hadthe merit ofcreatingaspecificlink betweenthepaymentofthegrantandtherequiredaction.
Stemi določbami seje ustvarila posebna povezava med plačilom donacijein potrebnimi ukrepi.
However,contaminationbynitratesor waste wateralsoaf-fected other projects, which were designed partlytoreplace thecontaminatedsourcesand which wereapprovedbythe Commission withoutanycondition.Further measuresaiming at speeding up environmental recovery were neverimposed as conditionsforthe EU grant.
Vendarjeonesnaževanjeznitratialiodpadnovodo vplivalo tudi na druge projekte, ki so bili deloma načrtovani kot nadomestiloza onesnaženevireinkijihje Komisija odobrila brez pogojev. Dodatni ukrepi za pospeševanje sanacije okolja nikoli niso bili postavljeni kot pogoj za donacijo EU.
Inthe Member States, the Court’s review found that, in no case did managing authorities suggest or make changes to the project proposals. Conditions about waterlosses and savings, as wellas measuresto protectthe quality ofraw water, were neverimposed.
Sodiščeje pri pregledih v državah članicah ugotovilo, da organi upravljanjav nobenem primeru niso predlagalisprememb predlogovprojektov,nitijihnisosamispreminjali.Pogoji vzveziz­izgubamivode,varčevanjemzvodoinzahtevepo uvedbi ukrepov za zaščito kakovosti neobdelane vode niso bili postavljeni.