natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
NB: Arrangements for the EP’s first reading1
Pro memoria: Mehanizmi prve obravnave v EP1
After receiving the Commission proposal, the President of the EP refers it to the relevant parliamentary committee for examination of its substance and, if appropriate, to other committees which may issue an opinion on the matter (Rule 49 of the Rules of Procedure of the EP).
Ko predsednik EP prejme predlog Komisije, ga pošlje pristojnemu parlamentarnemu odboru vvsebinski pregled in po potrebi drugim odborom, ki lahko izrazijo svoje mnenje ozadevi (člen 49 Poslovnika EP).
After deciding on the procedure to be followed for the examination of the proposal, the committee appoints a rapporteur on the Commission proposal from among its members or permanent substitutes, if it has not yet done so on the basis of the Commission’s annual legislative programme (Rule 45 of the Rules of Procedure of the EP).
Imenovani odbor najprej odloči, po katerem postopku bo obravnaval predlog, nato pa izmed svojih članov ali stalnih namestnikov imenuje poročevalca, pristojnega za predlog Komisije, če tega še ni storil na podlagi letnega zakonodajnega programa Komisije (člen 45 Poslovnika EP).
The numbering of the Rules is that of the Rules of Procedure of the EP for the seventh parliamentary term (December 2009).
Številčenje členov je vskladu s Poslovnikom EP za sedmo parlamentarno obdobje (december 2009).
The plenary session discusses the legislative proposal on the basis of the report drawn up by the relevant committee (Rule 55), which will include any proposed amendments to the proposal, a draft legislative resolution and, if appropriate, an explanatory statement.
Na plenarnem zasedanju se zakonodajni predlog obravnava na podlagi poročila pristojnega odbora (člen 55), ki vključuje morebitne predloge sprememb predloga, osnutek zakonodajnega predloga in po potrebi obrazložitev.
The plenary may also examine the legislative proposal without report or in accordance with a simplified procedure (Rule 46).
Zakonodajni predlog se lahko na plenarnem zasedanju obravnava tudi brez poročila ali po poenostavljenem postopku (člen 46).
In the draft resolution, the committee proposes to the plenary either the approval or rejection of the Commission proposal, or the tabling of amendments (Rule 55(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the EP).
V osnutku zakonodajne resolucije odbor predlaga, ali naj Parlament na plenarnem zasedanju predlog zakonodajnega akta odobri ali zavrne oziroma predlaga spremembe (člen 55(2) Poslovnika EP).
After the report has been adopted by the committee, it is still possible for an MEP or a group of MEPs, or for the rapporteur, often acting on behalf of a political group, to table amendments during the plenary debates.
Spremembe je mogoče predlagati tudi po sprejetju poročila – to lahko storijo poslanec, skupina poslancev ali sam poročevalec, pogosto vimenu politične skupine, med razpravo na plenarnem zasedanju.
In principle, political groups coordinate their respective positions during the debates and during the voting in committee and in plenary sessions.
Politične skupine načeloma usklajujejo stališča, ki jih bodo zavzele vrazpravah in med glasovanjem na sejah odbora in na plenarnem zasedanju.
Ordinary legislative procedure — First phase
Redni zakonodajni postopek –prva faza
Without time-limit
Rok ni določen
3 (+1) months
3 mesece (+ 1)
EP — First reading
EP – prva obravnava
EP — Second reading
EP – druga obravnava
Amendments
Predlogi sprememb
Outcome of the EP’s first reading accepted
Izid razprave v prvi obravnavi EP je sprejet
Outcome rejected —Council’s position at first reading
Izid razprave v prvi obravnavi EP je zavrnjen – stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi
Council — First reading
Svet – prva obravnava
European Parliament’s second reading (time-limit: 3 (+1) months)
Druga obravnava v Evropskem parlamentu [rok: 3 mesece (+ 1)]
The date of receipt of the Council’s position at first reading (in principle, the Monday of the week of the EP plenary) marks the beginning of the three-month time-limit for the EP’s second reading2
Na dan, ko EP prejme stališče Sveta vprviobravnavi (načeloma ponedeljek vtednu plenarnega zasedanja EP), se začne trimesečni rok, določen za drugo obravnavo EP2
At the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council this period may be extended by one month.
Ta rok je lahko na pobudo Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta podaljšan za en mesec.
The vote in plenary must take place within this time-limit and no later than the end of the fourth month.
Plenarno glasovanje mora biti izvedeno vtem roku, najpozneje pa ob koncu četrtega meseca.
Compliance with that time-limit concerns the vote in plenary and not the forwarding of the outcome of that vote to the Council.
Spoštovanje roka se nanaša na plenarno glasovanje in ne na posredovanje izida tega glasovanja Svetu.
The parliamentary committee examines the Council’s position at first reading and makes its recommendation.
Parlamentarni odbor preuči stališče Sveta vprviobravnavi in pripravi priporočilo.
The plenary considers the matter on the basis of that recommendation and holds the vote.
Na plenarnem zasedanju poslanci razpravljajo na podlagi tega priporočila, nato pa glasujejo.
The outcome of the vote may lead to three different situations:
Glede na izid glasovanja obstajajo tri možnosti:
Approval of the Council’s position at first reading:
Odobritev stališča Sveta vprvi obravnavi:
In this case, the act is deemed to have been adopted in accordance with the Council’s position at first reading.
V tem primeru se šteje, da je akt sprejet vobliki, ki ustreza stališču Sveta vprvi obravnavi.
Consequently, the legislative act (= Council’s position at first reading, in the form of a LEX PE-CONS document) is submitted directly for the signature of the Presidents and Secretaries-General of the EP and of the Council, and is published in the OJ.
Zato se zakonodajni akt (tj. stališče Sveta vprvi obravnavi, ki je navedeno vdokumentu LEX PE-CONS) takoj pošlje vpodpis predsednikoma in generalnima sekretarjema EP in Sveta ter objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
If the EP does not vote on the Council’s position at first reading within the time-limit of 3+1 months, the same procedure applies.
Če EP vroku 3 mesecev (+1) ne izreče mnenja ostališču Sveta vprvi obravnavi, se uporabi isti postopek.
Rejection of the Council’s position at first reading:
Zavrnitev stališča Sveta vprvi obravnavi:
Rejection of the Council’s position at first reading, on the basis of an absolute majority of MEPs (minimum of 369 votes), terminates the procedure, and the proposed act is then deemed not to have
Zavrnitev stališča Sveta vprvi obravnavi, ki jo izglasuje večina članov EP (vsaj 369 glasov) pomeni, da je postopek zaključen, in se šteje, da akt ni sprejet. Zadeva je lahko ponovno obravnavana samo, če Komisija predloži nov predlog.
The EP takes a different view from the Council, holding that this time-limit only starts to run when the President announces in plenary the forwarding of the Council position at first reading (Rule 61 of the Rules of Procedure of the EP).
EP vtem ne soglaša s Svetom, saj meni, da bi se moral navedeni rok začeti, ko predsednik na plenarnem zasedanju sporoči, da je bilo posredovano stališče Sveta vprviobravnavi (člen 61 Poslovnika EP).
Proposal of amendments to the Council’s position at first reading:
Predlog za spremembo stališča Sveta vprvi obravnavi:
Amendments to the Council’s position at first reading are passed on the basis of a majority of the EP’s component members.
Predlog za spremembo stališča Sveta se izglasuje zvečino glasov poslancev EP.
The outcome of the vote is noti ed to the Council and the Commission, and the latter must issue an opinion on the amendments.
Izid glasovanja se posreduje Svetu in Komisiji, ki morata dati mnenje opredlogih sprememb.
Council’s second reading (time-limit: 3 (+1) months)
Druga obravnava v Svetu [rok: 3 mesece (+ 1)]
The time-limit for the Council’s second reading starts to run from the official receipt of the amendments resulting from the EP’s second reading.
Rok za drugo obravnavo v Svetu se začne na dan, ko Svet prejme predloge sprememb, ki jih je EP izglasoval vdrugi obravnavi.
The Council may accept or reject these amendments
Svet lahko sprejme ali zavrne te predloge
Amendments approved (the Council acts by a qualified majority, but unanimously on amendments on which the Commission has delivered a negative opinion) — act deemed to have been adopted
Če so predlogi sprejeti (Svet odloča skvali cirano večino, razen če je Komisija dala negativno mnenje opredlogih – takrat odloča soglasno), se šteje, da je akt sprejet.
If the Council agrees to accept all the amendments, the act is deemed to have been adopted in the form of the Council’s position at first reading thus amended.
Če Svet sprejme vse predloge, se šteje, da je akt sprejet vobliki tako spremenjenega stališča Sveta vprvi obravnavi.
The legislative text (LEX PE-CONS document) is then submitted directly for the signature of the Presidents and Secretaries-General of the EP and of the Council and published in the OJ.
Nato se zakonodajno besedilo (dokument LEX PE-CONS) pošlje neposredno vpodpis predsednikoma in generalnima sekretarjema EP in Sveta ter objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Not all amendments are approved — convening of the Conciliation Committee
Zavrnitev vseh predlogov – sklic spravnega odbora
Within a time-limit of 6 (+2) weeks after the Council has rejected the amendments, its President, in agreement with the President of the EP, convenes the Conciliation Committee.
Če je Svet zavrnil vse predloge sprememb, predsednik Sveta ssoglasjem predsednika EP vroku 6 tednov (+ 2) skliče spravni odbor.
Before deciding whether or not to accept the EP amendments, the Commission’s opinion on them must have been referred to the Council.
Pred odločanjem osprejetju ali zavrnitvi predlogov sprememb EP mora Svet pridobiti mnenje Komisije oteh predlogih.
Ordinary legislative procedure — Second phase
Redni zakonodajni postopek – druga faza
EP — Second reading d te p o d
Stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi je zavrnjeno t ni sp Ak jet jet re p re
Council’s position at first reading ta o n t c
Stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi je sprejeto s p s je t je t
Amendments approved
Predlogi sprememb so sprejeti
Amendments rejected
Predlogi sprememb so zavrnjeni
Council — Second reading
Svet – druga obravnava
Conciliation (6 (+2) weeks)
Sprava [6 tednov (+ 2)]
The six-week time-limit for the work of the Conciliation Committee, which may be extended by a maximum of two weeks on the initiative of the EP or the Council and by common accord between them, begins to run from the first meeting of the Committee.
Obdobje šestih tednov, predvideno za delo spravnega odbora, ki se lahko na pobudo EP ali Sveta in ssoglasjem obeh institucij podaljša za največ dva tedna, se začne na dan, ko se odbor prvič sestane.
Before that date, it is essential to carry out preparatory work.
Pred tem so potrebne priprave.
The whole period of 6 (+2) weeks laid down as the time-limit for convening the Conciliation Committee, as well as the period between the moment when it is established that, politically, it is impossible to accept the EP’s second reading amendments and the formal adoption of that decision by the Council, may be put to good use for technical/negotiating contacts aimed at bringing positions closer before the first meeting of the Conciliation Committee.
Celotno obdobje 6 tednov (+ 2), ki je predvideno za sklic odbora, in čas od takrat, ko Svet sprejme politični dogovor ozavrnitvi predlogov sprememb EP, sprejetih vdrugi obravnavi, do takrat, ko Svet uradno sprejme ta sklep, je mogoče izkoristiti za stike na tehnični ravni in za pogajanja, da bi zbližali stališča še pred prvo sejo spravnega odbora.
The negotiation meetings prior to the Conciliation Committee4are conducted, on the Council side, by the Chairman of Coreper, either on the basis of a mandate from Coreper or on behalf of the Presidency, submitting proposals which are amply supported within the Council.
Na pogajanjih pred prvo sejo spravnega odbora4, Svet zastopa predsednik Coreperja, bodisi spooblastilom Coreperja ali vimenu predsedstva, in predstavi predloge, ki imajo široko podporo v Svetu.
The results of these three-party meetings (‘trialogues’) are then submitted to Coreper for examination.
Rezultate teh tristranskih sej („trialogov“) nato preuči Coreper.
For certain matters, the trialogues may be preceded or followed by technical meetings between the secretariats of the three institutions, and the Chairman of the working party may also sometimes take part.
Vnekaterih zadevah se lahko pred trialogom ali po njem organizirajo tehnični sestanki sekretariatov vseh treh institucij, na katerih včasih sodeluje tudi predsednik delovne skupine.
The trialogues and technical meetings prior to the first meeting of the Conciliation Committee will often make it possible to bring the conciliation to a conclusion during that first meeting, sometimes even in the form of a simple declaration of the pre-arranged agreement (a kind of ‘A’ item, to use the terminology of Council meetings).
S trialogom in tehničnimi sestanki pred prvo sejo spravnega odbora je spravni postopek pogosto mogoče zaključiti že na prvi seji spravnega odbora, včasih celo kar vobliki enostavne potrditve doseženega dogovora (kot točko pod „A“, vbesedišču sej Sveta).
In other cases, several meetings of the Conciliation Committee will be necessary before an agreement on a joint text can be reached.
Vdrugih primerih je potrebnih več sej spravnega odbora, da se doseže soglasje oskupnem besedilu.
Each of these meetings may themselves be preceded by informal trialogues and technical meetings.
Institucije lahko neuradne trialoge in tehnične sestanke organizirajo tudi pred vsemi temi sejami.
Informal trialogues with the participation of delegations from the Parliament and the Council as well as the Commission, which takes the necessary initiatives with a view to reconciling the positions of the two delegations.
Neuradni tristranski pogovori, vkaterih sodelujejo delegacije Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije; slednja pripravi potrebne pobude za zbližanje stališč obeh delegacij.
Proceedings of the Conciliation Committee
V delegaciji Sveta sodelujejo člani Sveta ali njihovi predstavniki.
As a general rule, it is made up of the representatives of the Member States within Coreper.
Praviloma jo sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic, ki so člani Coreperja.
The European Parliament delegation consists of 27 members and 27substitutes (the latter without a right to vote except in the absence of a member of their political group).
Delegacijo Evropskega parlamenta sestavlja 27 članov in 27 nadomestnih članov (slednji nimajo glasovalne pravice, razen vprimeru odsotnosti člana iz njihove politične skupine).
Three Vice-Presidents of the EP are permanent members of the Conciliation Committee and take turns to co-chair it.
Trije podpredsedniki EP so stalni člani spravnega odbora in izmenično opravljajo funkcijo sopredsednika.
The other 24 MEPs in the delegation are appointed by the political groups.
Ostalih 24 poslancev članov delegacije imenujejo politične skupine.
The great majority belong to the parliamentary committee responsible for the dossier.
Ponavadi so to člani parlamentarnega odbora, ki je pristojen za posamezno zadevo.
In most cases, the EP delegation tries to work by consensus.
Vvečini primerov delegacija EP svoje stališče sprejme skonsenzom.
In the case of a vote, which may take place at any stage of the conciliation, including for questions of procedure, decisions are taken by a minimum of 14 votes in favour.
Pri glasovanju, ki je lahko izvedeno vspravnem postopku, med drugim tudi glede postopkovnih vprašanj, je odločitev sprejeta, če zanjo glasuje vsaj 14 članov.
The Commission, represented in principle by the Commissioner responsible for the dossier, takes part in the Conciliation Committee’s proceedings and takes all the necessary initiatives with a view to reconciling the positions of the EP and the Council.
Komisija, ki jo načeloma zastopa pristojni komisar, sodeluje vspravnem postopku/pri delu spravnega odbora in daje vse potrebne pobude za zbližanje stališč EP in Sveta.
Such initiatives may include, inter alia, draft compromise texts reflecting the positions of the Council and the EP, with due regard to the role conferred upon the Commission by the Treaty.
Te pobude lahko vključujejo osnutke kompromisnih besedil, ki upoštevajo stališča EP in Sveta, ob upoštevanju vloge, ki jo Komisiji podeljuje Pogodba.
The Commission’s position has no influence, however, on the majority rules for the adoption of the joint text by the Conciliation Committee: qualified majority within the Council delegation5and simple majority within the EP delegation.
Vendar pa stališče Komisije ne vpliva na pravilo otem, katera večina je potrebna za sprejetje skupnega stališča spravnega odbora: kvalificirana večina vdelegaciji Sveta5in navadna večina vdelegaciji Komisije.
The Commission’s right of initiative therefore plays no role in the conciliation phase (see Article293 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union).
Pravice Komisije do pobude vspravnem postopku torej ni mogoče uveljaviti (glej člen 293 Pogodbe odelovanju Evropske unije).
See Annex III on the question of unanimity in the ordinary legislative procedure.
V zvezi zvprašanjem soglasja vrednem zakonodajnem postopku glej Prilogo III.
This trialogue is preceded, as a general rule, by a preparatory meeting of each delegation.
Jezikovna ureditev na teh sejah je enaka kot na sejah Sveta (23 jezikov).
The Committee has available to it the Commission proposal, the Council’s position at first reading, the amendments proposed by the European Parliament, the Commission’s opinion on those amendments (meeting file) and a joint working document by the European Parliament and Council delegations.
Institucija, ki organizira prvo sejo spravnega odbora, je pristojna za oblikovanje skupnega predloga in spremnega pisma.
This working document normally consists of two parts: Part A contains the elements of the compromise already agreed during the preparatory work and Part B the unresolved points with the respective negotiating positions (synoptic table in four columns).
Poleg tega je pristojna za to, da se zadevni zakonodajni akt predloži vpodpis predsednikoma Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta in objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, potem ko ga Evropski parlament in Svet dokončno sprejmeta.
The Conciliation Committee meets alternately at the premises of the Council and those of the EP.
Nato se po reviziji pravnikov lingvistov dokument objavi vvseh jezikih Unije.
This alternation rule applies both from one dossier to the next and within each dossier, although there are many exceptions to this rule for logistical reasons (availability of meeting rooms and/or teams of interpreters).
Skupni predlog se nato skupaj sspremnim pismom, ki ga podpišeta sopredsednika spravnega odbora, pošlje predsednikoma EP in Sveta (predsednik Coreperja praviloma podpiše pismo vimenu sopredsednika, ki zastopa Svet).
The institution which hosts the first meeting of the Conciliation Committee is responsible for editing the joint text and the forwarding letter, and, after definitive adoption of the legislative act in question by the European Parliament and the Council, for the signing of the act by the Presidents of the European Parliament and of the Council and for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
To spremno pismo kskupnemu predlogu, ki je vbistvu zapisnik spravnega odbora in vključuje morebitne izjave, prejme vvednost tudi član Komisije, ki sodeluje pri delu spravnega odbora6.
This document subsequently becomes available, after legal/linguistic revision, in the languages of the Union.
Če odbor skupnega predloga ne potrdi vroku, ki je določen v Pogodbi, se šteje, da predlagani akt ni sprejet.
This joint text is forwarded to the Presidents of the EP and of the Council by means of a letter signed by both co-Chairmen of the Conciliation Committee (as a general rule, the Chairman of Coreper signs on behalf of the Council
V zvezi z nalogami in pristojnostmi spravnega odbora glej sodbo v zadevi C-344/04 z dne 10. januarja 2006, International Air Transport Association proti Department for Transport, ZOdl., str. I-403 (točke 49–63).
Third reading by the EP and Council (time-limit: 6 (+2) weeks)
Tretja obravnava v EP in Svetu [rok: 6 tednov (+ 2)]
If the Conciliation Committee approves the joint text, the aim of the third reading is the adoption of the act by the two institutions in line with the joint text, with the European Parliament acting by a majority of the votes cast, and the Council by a qualified majority.
Če spravni odbor potrdi skupni predlog, obe instituciji vskladu stem predlogom sprejmeta akt vtretji obravnavi, pri čemer je v Evropskem parlamentu potrebna večina glasov, v Svetu pa kvalificirana večina.
If either of the two institutions fails to approve the proposed act within that period, it is deemed not to have been adopted.
Če katera od obeh institucij ne odobri predlaganega akta vtem roku, se šteje, da ni sprejet.
The third reading is conducted over a period of six weeks, which runs from the date on which the joint text is approved, which does not necessarily correspond to the date of the last meeting of the Conciliation Committee, but rather to the date of the signature by the two co-Chairmen of the Conciliation Committee of the letter forwarding the joint text, addressed to the Presidents of the EP and of the Council.
Rok za izvedbo tretje obravnave je šest tednov, začne pa se na dan odobritve skupnega predloga, kar ni nujno datum zadnje seje spravnega odbora, temveč je lahko tudi dan, ko sopredsednika spravnega odbora podpišeta spremno pismo kskupnemu predlogu, naslovljeno na predsednika EP in Sveta.
The six-week time-limit may be extended by a maximum of two weeks on the initiative of the EP or the Council and by common accord between them.
To obdobje se lahko podaljša za največ dva tedna, in sicer na pobudo EP ali Sveta in ssoglasjem obeh institucij.
Ordinary legislative procedure —Third phase
Redni zakonodajni postopek –tretja faza
EP — Third reading d te p d o te d p ta o o d
EP – tretja obravnava te r ej te r ej
Joint text accepted d
Ugotovitev, da ni bilo mogoče doseči soglasja p s je t
Joint text
Skupni predlog
Joint text accepted d te p o d
Skupni predlog je sprejet te r ej
Council — Third reading
Svet – tretja obravnava
Planning of proceedings
Priprava posvetovanj
When establishing its work schedule, each Presidency reserves a certain number of dates for Conciliation Committee meetings1.
Predsedstvo pri pripravi delovnega načrta predvidi določeno število datumov za seje spravnega odbora1.
This exercise is carried out, in principle a year in advance, between the EP and Council Secretariats, in agreement with the respective authorities.
Načeloma datume leto prej določita sekretariata EP in Sveta ssoglasjem obeh institucij. Pri določitvi datumov je treba upoštevati, da morajo biti takrat člani delegacij Parlamenta in Sveta ter zlasti član vlade, ki predseduje Svetu in bo sopredsedoval spravnemu odboru, prosti.
In principle, at the beginning of each six-month period or even slightly earlier, the Chairman of Coreper makes preliminary contact with the three Vice-Presidents responsible for conciliation as well as the various Chairmen of the parliamentary committees and rapporteurs involved in ordinary legislative procedure dossiers; they discuss the state of those dossiers, and jointly establish a timetable and working methods for the priorities to be worked on during that Presidency.
Pred začetkom vsakega polletja ali celo malo prej predsednik Coreperja praviloma vzpostavi prvi stik stremi podpredsedniki, pristojnimi za izvedbo spravnega postopka, ter predsedniki parlamentarnih odborov in poročevalci, pristojnimi za obravnavo zadev po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, da bi preučili trenutno stanje zadev ter skupaj določili časovni načrt in metodologijo za izvajanje posvetovanj včasu predsedovanja.
This discussion might cover:
Razprave se lahko nanašajo na: