natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The unrealistic call for projects `to tackle international paedophile rings' was removed from the priority areas and r e d e « n e d i n m o r e a p p r op r i a t e N G O t e r m s i n t h e l i s t o f ` a r e a s w h i c h h a v e nffo t yet been adequately covered' as:
Tudi nerealno zastavljen poziv za projekte, ki naj bi ¶razkrili mednarodne pedo«lskemre™eƒ,je bil umaknjen s prednostnega seznama in na novo d e « n i r a n v s k l a d u z N V O v o k v i r u s e z n a - m a ¶podroｲij, ki þe niso bila ustrezno obravnavanaƒ, kot:
In an annex entitled `Summary of the areas of activity covered by the programme in 1997 and of certain areas not yet covered', «rstattemptsweremadetoencourageorganisationstoavoidduplicating actions that had already been taken and to either diversify or develop ways to build on previous experience, ideally by broadening the application of existing experiences, lessons or materials to other Member States. Gaps identi«edwere:
V prilogi z naslovom ¶Povzetek podroｲij dejavnosti, obravnavanih v programu iz leta 1997, in nekaterih þe ne obravnavanih podroｲijƒ se je prviｲ poskuþalo spodbuditi organizacije, da ne bi ponavljale ™e izvedenih projektov in da bi namesto tega zamenjale ali razvile naｲine za nadgradnjo ™e pridobljenih izkuþenj, po mo™nosti s þirþo uporabo obstojeｲih izkuþenj, pouｲe-vanja ali gradiva na drugih dr™avah ｲlanicah.
‡ the identi«cationofvulnerabilityfactorsandgroupsandthedevelopmentofprotectionmechanisms based on these ̌ again an attempt to prompt understanding as a basis for action;
‡ doloｲitev dejavnikov ranljivosti in ranljivih skupin ter razvoj zaþｲitnih mehanizmov na pod-lagi le-teh › zopet poskus za spodbuditev razumevanja kot podlage za delovanje;
‡ abuse within the extended family group, within male groupings (e.g. armed forces, closed male society) and the abuse pro«leofsuchgroupingšade-emphasisonsexualexploi-tation and a broadening to wider issues of abuse and gendered violence, re‹ectingemerg-ing trends in international debate on these issues;
‡ zloraba znotraj þirþega dru™inskega kroga, znotraj moþkih zdru™b (npr. v vojski ali zaprti dru™bi, namenjeni izkljuｲno moþkim) ter lastnosti zlorab v takþnih skupinah › manjþi po-udarek na spolnem izkoriþｲanju in prehod na þirþa vpraþanja zlorabe in spolnega nasilja, kar odra™a trenutna nagnjenja v mednarodnih razpravah o teh vpraþanjih;
‡ the role of teachers, carers, siblings, family, society and other potential protectors and how to maximise their impact to protect women and children from abuse ̌ a concise attempt to «ndwaystomobiliseandempowercivilsocietyprotectionagents;
‡ vloga uｲiteljev, skrbnikov, bratov in sester, dru™ine, dru™be in drugih morebitnih varuhov in naｲin, kako maksimalno poveｲati njihov vpliv pri zaþｲiti ™ensk in otrok pred zlorabo › po-skus, da se najdejo naｲini, kako mobilizirati in pooblaþｲati predstavnike za zaþｲito civilne dru™be;
‡ the signs of abuse and how to recognise and report them with a view to intervening during abuse ̌ an important, targeted version of `awareness-raising' which aimed to provide tools so that those who are in a position to protect from abuse can recognise when they should act to stop the abuse and support the victim;
‡ znaki zlorabe in kako jih prepoznati in prijaviti, z namenom, da se posreduje, ko pride do zlorabe › pomembna razliｲica ¶ozaveþｲanjaƒ, katere namen je bil priskrbeti pripomoｲke, tako da tisti, ki bi lahko þｲitili pred zlorabo, prepoznajo, kdaj je treba ukrepati, in pomagajo ™rtvi;
‡ juvenile justice and protecting the victim from being re-victimised ̌ an emerging issue at international level and in Europe in particular in relation to the criminalisation of tra/ck-ing victims;
‡ sodstvo za mladoletnike in zaþｲita ™rtev pred ponovno zlorabo › vpraþanje, ki se pojavlja na mednarodni ravni in v Evropi þe zlasti v zvezi s kriminalizacijo ™rtev trgovine z ljudmi;
‡ behaviour patterns of abusers and methods of criminal cooperation ̌ an important «rststep in intervening in the area of the perpetrator and an important statement of the need to understand how they work;
‡ vedenjski vzorci storilcev in naｲini sodelovanja med kriminalnimi skupinami › pomemben zaｲetni korak pri poseganju v obmoｲje storilca in pomembna ugotovitev, da je treba razu-meti naｲin njegovega ravnanja;
‡ support mechanisms for women and children being abused and e.ectivereportingandintervention ̌ « r s t mffe n t i o nffo f s p e c i « c d i r e c t s up po r t a c t i o n , w h i c h l e d t o D a p h n e b e i n g cffo n s i d e r e d in NGO circles as a `victim-based' programme;
‡ mehanizmi podpore za ™enske in otroke, ki so zlorabljeni, uｲinkovito poroｲanje in posre-dovanje › prva omemba doloｲenega dejanja neposredne podpore, kar je privedlo do tega, da je postala Daphne v krogih NVO znana kot program, ki se osredotoｲa na ™rtev;
‡ self-help mechanisms for victims of violence ̌ a suggestion to promote full participation of victims and their empowerment, a theme that continued throughout the initiative and programme;
‡ mehanizmi samopomoｲi za ™rtve nasilja › predlog, ki spodbuja vkljuｲevanje ™rtve in ji daje moｲ; tema, ki je bila prisotna v ｲasu pobude in programa;
‡ statistical overviews of patterns of abuse, demographic trends, vulnerable groups, etc. ̌ recognition of the dire paucity of statistical mapping of the problem of violence in Europe, a recurring theme in subsequent years;
‡ statistiｲni pregledi vzorcev zlorab, demografska gibanja, ranljive skupine itd. › ugotovitev, da hudo primanjkuje statistiｲnih prikazov o problemu nasilja v Evropi; ta tema se pojavlja tudi v naslednjih letih;
‡ role of privacy and disclosure ̌ a response to analysis of the «rstyear'sproposals,wheremany projects demonstrated poor understanding of the rights of con«dentialityofbothvictims and perpetrators, and a prerequisite for any work on data collection and storage;
‡ vloga intimnosti in razkritja › odziv na analizo prijav iz prvega leta, ko se je pri veliko pro-jektih pokazala slaba seznanjenost s pravicami tako ™rtev kot storilcev do zaupnosti po-datkov, in obenem predpogoj za kakrþno koli delo v zvezi z zbiranjem in hranjenjem po-datkov;
‡ the image of the child and of women and the role of advertising, broadcast and print media and other mass media in protection and prevention ̌ an attempt to mobilise and inform press players in Europe in the wake of continued broad coverage of such issues demonstrating incomplete understanding;
‡ podoba otroka in ™enske ter vloga oglaþevanja, televizije, tiskanih medijev in drugih mno-™iｲnih medijev pri zaþｲiti in prepreｲevanju › poskus, da bi mobilizirali in obveþｲali delavce v medijih po Evropi, saj ti v svojih poroｲilih dokazujejo, da je njihovo poznavanje tega pro-blema pomanjkljivo;
‡ the impact of pornography, in particular of child pornography ̌ aimed at complementing work done elsewhere in the Commission on the vehicles used to transmit pornography.
‡ vpliv pornogra«je,þezlastiotroþkepornogra«je› namenje,dasedopolnidelo,opravljenodrugje znotraj Komisije, v zvezi z naｲini in sredstvi za posredovanje pornografskega mate-riala.
In the event, the projects subsequently accepted for funding did indeed re‹ectthesesugges-tions, even if they did not in most cases exactly reproduce them.
Projekti, ki jim je bilo potem odobreno «nanciranje,sodejanskoodra™alitepredloge,ｲepravjim v veｲini primerov niso bili povsem enaki.
Many more projects in the second year of the Daphne initiative aimed to undertake research or studies as a basis for then developing actions or tools for action.
Namen veliko veｲ projektov v drugem letu po-bude Daphne je bil, da se izvede raziskave ali þtudije kot podlago za kasnejþe dejavnosti ali orodja za ukrepanje.
Many of the projects aimed to «lltheidenti«edgapsin a modest way by «rstpilotingactionswithindistinctvulnerablegroupssuchasruralwom-en, or young people living in institutions.
Veliko projektov si je zadalo, da bodo na skromen naｲin ¶zapolnili vrzeliƒ, in sicer tako, da so sprva usmerjali dejavnosti znotraj posameznih ranljivih skupin, na primer ™ensk na pode™elju ali mladih ljudi, ki ™ivijo v zavodih.
In this way, the Daphne initiative began to lay the foundations of much more solid and usable knowledge and practical experience.
Na ta naｲin je pobuda Daphne zaｲela postavljati temelje mnogo trdnejþega in bolj uporabnega znanja ter praktiｲnih izkuþenj.
E . o r t s t o l e a r n l e s s o n s f r o m i n i t i a l e x p e r i e n c e s o f t h e D a p h n e i n i t i a t i v e , a n d t o bu i l d t h e s e i n t o an improved programme that would be more likely to have real impact, grow the knowl-edge base in Europe and produce value for the European Commission, were supported by the creation in 1998 of a simple newsletter called Daphne News.
Objava prve okro™nice Daphne news leta 1998 je þe dodatno spodbudila ™eljo, da bi se kaj na-uｲili iz prvih izkuþenj s pobudo Daphne in ta spoznanja vkljuｲili v izboljþan program, ki bi kasneje imel najbr™ veｲji vpliv, ter da bi poveｲali zbirko znanja v Evropi in prispevali k vredno-sti za Evropsko komisijo.
This Commission initiative was designed s p e c i « c a l l y t o ` po s i t i o n ' D a p h n e a s a p r o g r a m mffe t h a t s up po r t e d a n a l y s i s a n d r e ‹ e c t i o n , i nfo r m a t i o n e x c h a n g e a n d n e t w o r k i n g nffo t o n l y b y o t h e r a g e n c i e s bu t w i t h t h e a c t i v e participation of the Commission.
Pobuda Komisije je bila oblikovana posebej zato, da bi Daphne pred-stavila kot program, ki spodbuja analiziranje in razmiþljanje, izmenjavo informacij in vzpostav-ljanje stikov › in to ne le s strani agencij, temveｲ tudi ob aktivnem sodelovanju Komisije.
Daphne News took an informal tone in sharing information on the Daphne initiative itself and on projects that had received monitoring visits.
Daphne news je na nekoliko neuraden naｲin poroｲal o pobudi Daphne in o projektih, ki so jih spremljali opazovalci.
It was used to share with organisations that were implementing projects or that had already completed project activity ideas about inter-esting projects as well as lists, for example, of newly selected projects.
Daphne news je bil namenjen izmenjavi idej in seznamov o npr. na novo izbranih projektih med organizacijami, ki so te projekte izvajale, in tistimi, ki so projekte ™e zakljuｲile.
Through this list, in particular, organisations were able to learn about other organisations working in the same area as them in other Member States.
S pomoｲjo tega seznama so organizacije lahko izvedele za druge organizacije, ki so delovale na enakem podroｲju v drugih dr™avah ｲlanicah.
Over time, many of the organisations contacted each other and proposed partnerships for new Daphne projects ̌ to the extent, in fact, that peo-ple within the organisations and indeed at the Commission began to talk about `the Daphne family'.
Sｲasoma so mnoge organizacije stopile v stik in predlagale sodelovanje na novih projektih Daphne › in to do takþne mere, da so ljudje znotraj organizacij in celo v Komisiji zaｲeli govoriti o ¶dru™ini Daphneƒ.
These partnerships have in many cases continued long beyond the duration of the Daphne project that gave rise to them and in some cases have become structural.
Ta partnerstva so mnogokrat trajala þe dolgo po izteku projekta Daphne, zaradi katerega so pravzaprav na-stala, in v nekaterih primerih so dobila enoten ustroj.
For exam-ple, a 1998 project implemented by Radda Barnen (Save the Children Sweden) that identi«eda small NGO as a partner in Spain resulted in the Spanish organisation in time becoming Save the Children Spain.
Na primer projekt iz leta 1998, ki ga je izvajala Radda Barnen (projekt Reþite otroke Þvedska), si je za partnerja izbral majhno NVO v Þpaniji. Rezultat je bil, da je þpanska organizacija sｲasoma postala ¶Reþite otroke Þpanijaƒ.
Unfortunately, the compilation, writing and distribution of Daphne News was time-consuming for the small team of people working on the Daphne initiative.
çal pa je majhna skupina ljudi, ki je sodelovala pri pobudi Daphne, porabila veliko ｲasa za sestavljanje, pisanje in distribucijo Daphne news.
Daphne News ceased to exist after the third issue in May 1999 and is now replaced by a website, regularly updated.
Zato je Daphne news nehal izhajati po tretji þtevilki maja 1999. Namesto tega obstaja spletna stran, ki se redno posodablja.
Its ad-dress is: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Naslov spletne strani je: h t tp : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / f uffn d i n g / d a p h n e / f uffn d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Again in 1999, the last year of the Daphne initiative, the lessons learned through project visits, reports (including a «rstexternalevaluationreportbyanindependentteamofexpertsonthe1997 initiative) and selection and monitoring processes were built into the call for proposals and guidelines for applicants.
Leta 1999, zadnje leto pobude Daphne, so bila spoznanja v okviru obiskov projektov, poroｲil (vkljuｲno s prvim zunanjim poroｲilom o ocenjevanju s strani neodvisne skupine strokovnjakov glede pobude iz leta 1997), izbirnih in nadzornih postopkov ponovno zajeta v pozivu za zbi-ranje prijav in v smernicah za prosilce.
«rstquarterof2000,gaveorganisationsconsideringapplyingforfundingtheopportunitytoread through the «nalreportsofallprojectscompletedin1997and,throughasimplekey-word search, to pay particular attention to work that had been done in the area in which they were considering submitting a project.
Med branjem prijav projektov za leto 1998 je bilo opaziti veliko prijav, ki so zatrjevale, da se bo njihova dejavnost izvajala ¶prviｲƒ, ｲeprav je taka dejavnost v resnici ™e potekala v Evropi ali je celo prejemala « n a n ｲ n o p o d p o r o v o k v i r u p ob u d e D a p h n e .
It had been noted, when project submissions for 1998 were read, that many of the projects claimed to be suggesting activities that would be attempted `for the «rsttimeever'when,infact, such activities had already been undertaken in Europe or indeed even funded by the Daphne initiative itself.
Z a t oj ep o z i v z a z b i r a nj ep r i j a v v letu 1999 poudaril, da morajo organizacije pri pripravi projekta poizvesti o dejavnostih, ki so se ™e izvajale in jih, kjer je to mogoｲe, nadgraditi ali prilagoditi za þirþo uporabo v sklopu EU ali za drugaｲne okoliþｲine.
The call for proposals in 1999 therefore emphasised the need for or-ganisations preparing projects to inform themselves of actions that had already been imple-mented and, where possible, to build on these or adapt them either for broader EU coverage or for application in di.erentcircumstances.Thisencouragementto`build'ratherthan`rein-vent' was in fact repeated each year from 1999, although a large number of project submis-sions continued to suggest actions that did not take account of previous experience.
Spodbujanje ¶nadgradnjeƒ namesto ¶novih odkritijƒ se zdaj po-javlja vsako leto od 1999 dalje, kljub temu je þe veliko prijav za projekte vsebovalo dejavnosti, ki niso upoþtevale spoznanj iz prejþnjih projektov.
In 1999, a number of new issues also began to emerge, however.
V letu 1999 so se zaｲela pojavljati þtevilna nova vpraþanja.
In particular, the focus on raising awareness of violence against women in Europe in 1999 prompted an increase in awareness-raising projects on gendered violence in general and on domestic violence in par-ticular.
Þe posebno ozaveþｲanje o nasilju nad ™enskami v Evropi v letu 1999 je povzroｲilo porast v þtevilu projektov ozaveþｲanja o sek-sistiｲnem nasilju na sploþno in zlasti o nasilju v domaｲem okolju.
Increasing public and political attention to the issue of migration into Europe, and concern that misunderstanding of this issue was giving rise to increasing discrimination and abuse of migrant people living and working in Europe, prompted a number of projects focus-ing on the rights of migrants and on support to victims of racism and discrimination.
Poveｲano javno in politiｲno zanimanje za problem preseljevanja v Evropo in zaskrbljenost, da je zaradi nerazumevanja tega problema prihajalo do diskriminacije in zlorabljanja preseljencev, ki ™ivijo in delajo v Ev-ropi, sta navdihnila þtevilne projekte, ki so se usmerili v pravice preseljencev in v pomoｲ za ™rtve rasizma in diskriminacije.
Projects on the clandestine migration of unaccompanied minors, on the rights of migrant domestic workers, on support to victims of tra/ckingandtopreventexploitationofmigrantand tra/ckedwomen,wereforerunnersofa growingnumberofprojectsthat,inthefollow-ing years, r e ‹ e c t e d a n i m po r t a n t n e w w o r k l o a d f o r N G O s a n d p u b l i c a uijt h o r i t i e s i n E u r op e .
Projekti o tajnem preseljevanju mladoletnikov brez spremstva, o pravicah domaｲih delavcev migrantov, o pomoｲi ™rtvam trgovine in projekti za prepreｲevanje izkoriþｲanja preseljenk in takih, ki so bile ™rtve trgovine, so bili predniki þtevilnih novih projektov, ki so v naslednjih letih predstavljali nov pomemben ¶zalogajƒ dela za NVO in javne organe v Evropi.
I m po r t a n t issues such as rape, female genital mutilation (FGM) and violence in the aftermath of cffo n ‹ i c t a l s o « g u r e d f o r t h e « r s t t i mffe a m o n g D a p h n e - f u n d e d p r o j e c t s .
Pomembna vpraþanja, kot so posilstvo, pohabljanje ™enskih spolovil (FGM) in nasilje po konｲanih vojnah in spopadih, so se prviｲ pojavila v projektih, ki jih je « n a n c i r a l p r o g r a m D a p h n e .
While Daphne projects continued, therefore, to re‹ectwellthenatureofdebateandneedsrelated to violence in Europe, some problems noted from the very beginning of the initiative persisted.
Peprav so projekti Daphne þe naprej dobro odra™ali naravo razprav in potreb, povezanih z nasiljem v Evropi, so nekateri problemi, ki so bili nakazani na samem zaｲetku pobude, þe ved-no ostajali.
These related mostly to project design and management, and suggested a contin-ued need for improvements in the capacity of organisations, for the Commission to continue to monitor and provide technical advice to projects, and for ongoing work in the Daphne `team' itself to draw lessons, analyse trends and develop the initiative in the light of this re‹ec-tion.
Ti so se nanaþali predvsem na oblikovanje in upravljanje projektov in so nenehno nakazovali potrebo po izboljþanju zmogljivosti organizacij, po tem, da Komisija þe naprej spremlja projekte in nudi strokovne nasvete zanje, da ¶skupinaƒ Daphne nadaljuje z zbiranjem spoznanj, analizo gibanj in v tej luｲi z razvijanjem pobude.
In regard to project preparation and planning, there were still weaknesses in:
Kar se tiｲe priprave in naｲrtovanja projektov, so þe vedno obstajale slabosti na naslednjih po-droｲjih:
‡ preparatory research;
‡ pripravljalne raziskave;
‡ focusing on cause and e.ectandmatchingactionstotheproblemstheyaimedtosolve;
‡ osredotoｲanje na vzroke in posledice ter primerjava ukrepov s problemi, ki naj bi jih ti ukre-pi reþili;
‡ learning lessons and knowing how to share these with appropriate groups, and in particu-lar spreading these in appropriate form and with added value in other Member States;
‡ spoznanja in kako le-ta deliti s primernimi skupinami, þe zlasti njihovo posredovanje v pri-merni obliki in z dodano vrednostjo v drugih dr™avah ｲlanicah;
‡ using partnerships to improve coverage and e/ciency;
‡ izraba partnerstev za veｲji obseg delovanja in veｲjo uｲinkovitost;
‡ using the budget to facilitate implementation and output, rather than as a simple `costing' exercise;
‡ uporaba proraｲuna za boljþe izvajanje in storilnost in ne zgolj kot vaja za ¶obraｲunavanje stroþkovƒ;
‡ evaluating results and performance.
‡ ocenjevanje rezultatov in delovnega uｲinka.
Many submissions remained local, with token partnerships set up purely for the purpose of satisfying the Daphne selection criteria.
Mnoge prijave so ostale na lokalni ravni, partnerstva so se sklenila zgolj simbolno, zato da bi bilo zadoþｲeno izbirnim merilom programa Daphne.
A large number of projects did not seem to realise
‡ lotili so se do tedaj nedotaknjenih tem;
‡ they tackled subjects not hitherto attempted;
Cilji in prednostne naloge
‡ they sometimes piloted new or variant methodologies, often across a number of d i . e r e n t Mffe m b e r States;
‡ vｲasih so uporabljali nove ali nekoliko drugaｲne metodologije, pogosto v þtevilnih dr™avah ｲlanicah;
‡ the output of many projects was of a high standard and usable in several Member States, sometimes all;
‡ rezultati mnogih projektov so bili zelo kvalitetni in uporabni v veｲ dr™avah ｲlanicah, vｲasih v vseh;
‡ new insights were gained through research, studies and data collection, and in particular this often included comparative analysis across the EU;
‡ priþli so do novih spoznanj s pomoｲjo raziskav, þtudij in zbiranja podatkov; pogosto je to vkljuｲevalo tudi primerjalno analizo po vsej EU;
‡ the support of the Commission opened doors for many organisations and enhanced their ability to function within their own environment and at European (and in some cases in-ternational) level.
‡ pomoｲ Komisije je odprla vrata mnogim organizacijam ter poveｲala njihovo sposobnost delovanja znotraj lastnega okolja in na evropski (in vｲasih mednarodni) ravni.
`Project coordinators judge that the label ``European Commission'' was decisive to add credibil-ity to their action „team members noticed an immediate change of attitude in school au-thorities.' [External evaluation of Project 97/066/WC]
¶Koordinatorji projekta ocenjujejo, da je bila oznaka ,Evropska komisija` odloｲilna, zato da se je poveｲala verodostojnost njihovih dejavnosti „ ｲlani skupine so opazili takojþnjo spremembo v odnosu pri þolskih organih.ƒ (Zunanja ocena projekta 97/066/WC)
By the time the Daphne programme 2000›03 was launched in 2000, an enormous amount of new work had emerged from the three-year experience of the Daphne initiative, and the Com-mission's commitment to this work was regularly talked about in international circles.
Do leta 2000, ko je zaｲel delovati program Daphne 2000›2003, so triletne izkuþnje s pobudo Daphne prinesle ogromno novega dela. V mednarodnih krogih se je redno govorilo o zave-zanosti Komisije temu delu.
NGO support was solid and lessons from Daphne projects found their way into conferences and workshops in other regions as lead and partner organisations `spread the word'.
Podpora NVO je bila trdna in spoznanja iz projektov Daphne so priþla vse do konferenｲnih sreｲanj in delavnic v drugih regijah, zahvaljujoｲ se organizacijam in njihovim partnerjem, ki so þirili novice.
The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child received a b r i e « n g o n D a p h n e i n 1 9 9 9 ; t h e f o l l o w - up r e po r t to the World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children listed Daphne as an example of good regional practice. The `spirit' of Daphne, characterised as:
Odbor ZN za otrokove pravice je leta 1999 prejel kratko poroｲilo o Daphne; poroｲilo za svetovni kongres proti izkoriþｲanju otrok v komercialne namene navaja Daphne kot primer dobre prakse na regionalni ravni. ¶Bistvoƒ programa Daphne je bilo opisano z na-slednjimi besedami:
‡ taking calculated risks to break new ground,
‡ pripravljen na tveganje in oranje ledine;
‡ learning and sharing,
‡ se uｲi in deli znanja;
‡ supporting partnerships both in projects and with the Commission,
‡ podpira partnerstva v sklopu projektov in s Komisijo;
‡ promoting added value across the Member States,
‡ poveｲuje dodano vrednost po vseh dr™avah ｲlanicah;
‡ seeking to empower protection structures, groups and individuals,
‡ skuþa krepiti zaþｲitne strukture, skupine in posameznike;
‡ tackling violence comprehensively from the angles of prevention, protection, support, re-habilitation and in the context of grassroots-level information about European and na-tional realities, was cited as a reason for the continued support of NGOs, public authorities and other players.
‡ nasilja se loteva vsestransko in z razliｲnih zornih kotov › prepreｲevanja, zaþｲite, pomoｲi in rehabilitacije ter v okviru lokalnih informacij o razmerah na evropski in dr™avni ravni.