natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Thus, when going on to examine whether the suspension of operation sought should be ordered as a matter of urgency, the President found that it was not for him to prejudice measures which might be taken by the Commission in order
Sodišče prve stopnje je prav tako navedlo, da je sodišče Skupnosti že imelo priložnost uporabiti določena načela povračila neupravičeno plačanih zneskov, zlasti na področju neupravičene obogatitve, katere prepoved predstavlja splošno načelo prava Skupnosti, in sklenilo, da je treba preveriti, ali so v obravnavani zadevi izpolnjeni pogoji za tožbo zaradi neupravičene obogatitve ali pogoji za tožbo, ki temelji na poslovodstvu brez naročila.
Orders of the President of the Court of First Instance of 20 July 2006 in Case T-114/06 R Globe v Commission and of 13 July 2006 in Case T-11/06 R Romana Tabacchi v Commission, not yet published in the ECR.
Sodišče prve stopnje je v zvezi s tem spomnilo na načine izvrševanja teh zahtevkov v skladu s splošnimi načeli, ki so skupna državam članicam, in sicer, prvič, da teh zahtevkov ni mogoče postaviti, če korist obogatenega ali poslovodje izhaja iz pogodbe ali iz zakonske dolžnosti, in drugič, da je take zahtevke mogoče splošno uporabiti le podredno, in sicer, kadar prikrajšana oseba za pridobitev tega, kar se ji dolguje, nima na voljo drugega zahtevka. V tej zadevi je na podlagi tega odločilo, da tožbeni razlogi tožeče stranke niso utemeljeni.
Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 20 September 2005 in Case T-195/05 R Deloitte Business Advisory v Commission [2005] ECR II-3485.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 16. novembra 2006 v zadevi Masdar proti Komisiji, T-333/03, še neobjavljena v ZOdl.
Proceedings to comply with any annulling decision.
Predlogi za izdajo začasne odredbe
It added that nevertheless, the general principle of Community law which gives individuals a right to complete and eective judicial protection required that interim protection be available to individuals, if it was necessary for the full eectiveness of the denitive future decision, in order to ensure that there was no lacuna in the legal protection provided by the Community courts.
Predsedniku Sodišča prve stopnje je bilo v tem letu predloženih 25 vlog za izdajo začasne odredbe, kar pomeni rahel porast v primerjavi s številom vlog (21), predloženih v prejšnjem letu.
It should therefore be examined whether, following an annulling judgment, the possibility of the Commission organising a new tendering procedure would allow such damage to be repaired and, if that is not the case, it should be assessed whether the applicant could be compensated accordingly.
Leta 2006 je sodnik, pristojen za izdajo začasne odredbe, rešil 24 zadev in dvakrat ugodil predlogoma za izdajo začasne odredbe s sklepoma Globe proti Komisiji in Romana Tabacchi proti Komisiji72.
In this case it was very unlikely that, following an annulling judgment, which would probably be delivered after the contract had been performed, a fresh tendering procedure would be organised by the Commission.
Sklep Globe proti Komisiji je nadaljevanje sklepa, izdanega leta 2005 v zadevi Deloitte proti Komisiji73, vendar je bilo v nasprotju z odločitvijo v slednji zadevi predlogu za izdajo začasne odredbe ugodeno.
The President therefore examined whether Globe could be compensated for the loss of a chance of being awarded the contract which was the subject of the Community tendering procedure.
Najprej je glede pogoja obstoja fumus boni juris sodnik, pristojen za izdajo začasne odredbe, odločil, da eden od razlogov, ki jih je navedla tožeča stranka, pomeni resen dvom v zakonitost javnega naročila.
Although that chance was a very serious one, it was very dicult, or even impossible, to quantify it and, therefore, to assess as precisely as required the damage resulting from its loss.
Nato je preizkusil, ali je nujno izdati predlagani sklep o odlogu izvršitve, in ugotovil, da ni pristojen, da bi prejudiciral ukrepe, ki bi jih Komisija sprejela zaradi morebitne izvršitve sodbe o razglasitvi ničnosti.
As the damage could not be quantied suciently precisely, it had to be considered to be very dicult to remedy.
Kljub temu je dodal, da splošno načelo pravice do popolnega in učinkovitega sodnega varstva pomeni, da se lahko upravičencem zagotovi začasno varstvo, če je potrebno za polno učinkovitost bodoče končne odločbe, da bi se izognilo praznini v sodnem varstvu, ki ga zagotavljajo sodišča Skupnosti.
The President of the Court of First Instance also took the view that the damage was serious, having regard to the particular circumstances of the case and the characteristics of the market on which the applicant and the undertaking awarded the contract were operating.
Torej je treba preizkusiti, ali bi po morebitni sodbi o razglasitvi ničnosti možnost Komisije, da organizira nov postopek javnega razpisa, omogočila povrniti škodo, ki jo zatrjuje tožeča stranka, in v primeru nikalnega odgovora presoditi, ali bi bilo slednji mogoče povrniti škodo.
Finally, having weighed up the interests involved, the President recalled that there were serious reasons for thinking that the Commission had acted unlawfully.
V tej zadevi je bilo malo verjetno, da bi Komisija v primeru morebitne sodbe o razglasitvi ničnosti, ki bi bila verjetno razglašena po izvršitvi pogodbe, organizirala nov postopek javnega razpisa.
Further, the Commission could not plead any interest liable to aect that assessment, with the result that the President ordered the suspension of operation of the contract.
Sodnik, pristojen za izdajo začasne odredbe, je torej preizkusil, ali bi se družbi Globe lahko povrnila škoda za izgubljeno možnost skleniti pogodbo, ki bi bila predmet postopka javnega razpisa Skupnosti.
In the order in Romana Tabacchi v Commission, the President of the Court of First Instance ruled on an application made by an undertaking which sought a waiver of the obligation to set up a bank guarantee as a condition for the fine imposed on it not being recovered immediately.
Čeprav je bila ta možnost zelo resna, jo je bilo zelo težko oziroma nemogoče kvantitativno opredeliti, zaradi česar je bilo nemogoče z natančnostjo, ki se zahteva, oceniti škodo, ki je posledica njene izgube.
The President found that there were exceptional circumstances in the case which justied a partial suspension of the obligation on the applicant to set up a bank guarantee.
Ker škode ni bilo mogoče dovolj natančno izraziti v številkah, jo je bilo treba oceniti za zelo težko povračljivo.
The applicant succeeded in establishing not only the existence of a prima facie case but also that its precarious financial situation and that of its shareholders were the reasons for the refusal by certain banks to grant the guarantee required.
Predsednik Sodišča prve stopnje je prav tako menil, da je bila navedena škoda huda glede na posebne okoliščine te zadeve in značilnosti trga, na katerem poslujeta tožeča stranka in podjetje, ki mu je bilo naročilo oddano.
Having weighed up the interests in the matter, the President also took the view that the financial interests of the Commission would not be better safeguarded by immediate enforcement of the decision because it was unlikely that it would be able to obtain the amount of the fine.
Končno je sodnik, pristojen za izdajo začasne odredbe, ob tehtanju prisotnih interesov opomnil, da obstajajo tehtni razlogi za ugotovitev, da je Komisija ravnala nezakonito.
In this case, too, interim measures were ordered.
Poleg tega, upoštevajoč odškodnino, ki jo lahko izbrani ponudnik uveljavlja od Komisije pri
Finally, mention should be made of the fact that, in Endesa v Commission 74, already cited in connection with the control of concentrations, the applicant made an application for
Sklepa predsednika Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. julija 2006 v zadevi Globe proti Komisiji, T-114/06 R, in z dne 13. julija 2006 v zadevi Romana Tabacchi proti Komisiji, T-11/06 R, še neobjavljena v ZOdl.
Judgment of 14 July 2006 in Case T-417/05 Endesa v Commission, not yet published in the ECR.
Sklep predsednika Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 20. septembra 2005 v zadevi Deloitte Business Advisory proti Komisiji, T-195/05 R, Recueil, str. II-3485.
Court of First Instance interim measures, seeking, inter alia, an order suspending the operation of a Commission decision rejecting the complaint by Endesa 75.
Na koncu naj omenimo dejstvo, da je v zadevi, v kateri je bila izdana sodba Endesa proti Komisiji74, že omenjena v zvezi z nadzorom koncentracij, tožeča stranka vložila predlog za izdajo začasne odredbe, katerega namen je bil, da se naloži odložitev izvršitve odločbe Komisije, ki je zavrnila pritožbo družbe Endesa75.
In his order, the President recalled that the urgency of an application for interim measures must be assessed in relation to the need for an interim order in order to avoid serious and irreparable damage being caused to the party who requests the interim measure.
Sodnik, pristojen za izdajo začasne odredbe, je v svojem sklepu spomnil, da je treba nujnost zadevnega predloga presojati glede na potrebo, da se sprejme začasna odločitev z namenom, da stranki, ki predlaga izdajo začasne odredbe, ne bi nastala huda in nepopravljiva škoda.
Such damage must, in particular, be likely to be caused to the interests of the party seeking the interim measure.
Taka škoda bi lahko nastala zlasti stranki, ki predlaga izdajo začasne odredbe.
In that regard, Endesa relied, inter alia, on the risk that, without interim measures, Gas Natural might take control of it and proceed to dismantle it, and such damage would, according to the applicant, also aect its shareholders.
V zvezi s tem se je družba Endesa med drugim sklicevala na tveganje, da bi ob neobstoju začasnega ukrepa družba Gas Natural prevzela nadzor in začela z njenim razbitjem, škodo, ki bi vplivala tudi na njene delničarje.
According to the President, to establish urgency Endesa cannot rely on damage which would be caused to its shareholders, as they have a legal personality separate from Endesa’s.
Vendar se po mnenju sodnika, pristojnega za izdajo začasne odredbe, družba Endesa iz razloga nujnosti ne more učinkovito sklicevati na škodo, ki naj bi bila povzročena njenim delničarjem, saj so ti ločene pravne osebe.
As regards the damage alleged to have been caused to Endesa as such, the President of the Court of First Instance found that it was hypothetical, because it depended on the launching and success of the take-over bid, the success of which was not proven at that stage.
Glede škode, ki naj bi nastala družbi Endesa, predsednik Sodišča prve stopnje ugotavlja, da je hipotetična, saj je odvisna od objave in ugodnega izida ponudbe za prevzem, katere uspeh na tej stopnji ni dokazan.
Finally, the President took the view that, in any event, it had not been established that the remedies provided by Spanish law would not enable Endesa to avoid the serious and irreparable damage which it alleged.
Na koncu je sodnik, pristojen za izdajo začasne odredbe, menil, da v vsakem primeru ni dokazano, da pravna sredstva, ki jih predvideva špansko pravo, družbi Endesa ne omogočajo, da bi se izognila hudi in nepopravljivi škodi, ki jo navaja.
The President of the Court of First Instance therefore dismissed the application for interim relief.
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 14. julija 2006 v zadevi Endesa proti Komisiji, T-417/05, še neobjavljena v ZOdl.
Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 1 February 2006 in Case T-417/05 R Endesa v Commission, not published in the ECR.
Sklep predsednika Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 1. februarja 2006 v zadevi Endesa proti Komisiji, T-417/05 R, ZOdl., str. II-18.
B — Composition of the Court of First Instance
B – Sestava Sodišča prve stopnje
(Order of precedence as at 6 October 2006)
(Protokolarni vrstni red na dan 6. oktobra 2006)
First row, from left to right:
Prva vrsta, z leve proti desni: sodnica V.
I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judge; E. Cremona, Judge; E. Martins Ribeiro, Judge; A. W. H. Meij, Judge; N. J. Forwood, Judge; F. Dehousse, Judge; O. Czúcz, Judge; I. Pelikánová, Judge.
Czúcz; sodnica I. Pelikánová.
Third row, from left to right:
Tretja vrsta, z leve proti desni: sodnika N. Wahl in S.
Members of the Court of First Instance
Člani Sodišča prve stopnje
(in order of their entry into oce)
(po vrstnem redu zasedbe funkcije)
Born 1945; Lawyer-linguist at the Court of Justice; Administrator in the Ministry of Justice; Examining Magistrate; Legal Attaché in the Permanent Representation of Denmark to the European Communities; Temporary Judge at the Østre Landsret (Court of Appeal); Head of the Constitutional and Administrative Law Division in the Ministry of Justice; Director of a department in the Ministry of Justice; University Lecturer; Member of the Steering Committee on Human Rights at the Council of Europe (CDDH), and subsequently Member of the Bureau of the CDDH; in 2004 Member of the ‘Ad-hoc committee on judicial training’at the Academy of European Law, Trier (Germany); Judge at the Court of First Instance since 25 September 1989; President of the Court of First Instance since 4 March 1998.
Rojen leta 1945; pravnik lingvist na Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti; referent v pravosodnem ministrstvu; sodnik prisednik; pravni svetovalec Stalnega predstavništva Danske pri Evropski gospodarski skupnosti; začasni sodnik na Østre Landsret (dansko pritožbeno sodišče); predstojnik „oddelka za ustavno in upravno pravo“ pri pravosodnem ministrstvu; direktor oddelka na pravosodnem ministrstvu; docent; član Pripravljalnega odbora za človekove pravice Sveta Evrope (CDDH), nato član pisarne CDDH; leta 2004 član „Ad-hoc odbora za izobraževanje sodnikov in državnih tožilcev“ na Akademiji za evropsko pravo, Trier, Nemčija; sodnik na Sodišču prve stopnje od 25. septembra 1989; predsednik Sodišča prve stopnje od 4. marca 1998.
Born 1946; Abogado del Estado (at Jaén and Granada); Registrar to the Economic and Administrative Court of Jaén, and subsequently of Cordoba; Member of the Bar (Jaén and Granada); Head of the Spanish State Legal Service for Cases before the Court of Justice of the European Communities; Head of the Spanish delegation in the working group created at the Council of the European Communities with a view to establishing the Court of First Instance of the European Communities; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 25 September 1989.
Rojen leta 1946; državni pravobranilec (v mestih Jaén in Granada); sekretar Upravnega gospodarskega sodišča v mestu Jaén, nato v Córdobi; odvetnik (v mestih Jaén in Granada); predstojnik pravne službe za zastopanje pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti v španskem ministrstvu za zunanje zadeve; vodja španske delegacije v delovni skupini Sveta, ki je pripravljala ustanovitev Sodišča prve stopnje; sodnik na Sodišču prve stopnje od 25. septembra 1989.
Born 1942; Doctor of Laws of the University of Helsinki; assistant lecturer in civil and commercial law at the University of Helsinki; Director of Legal Aairs and Commercial Policy at the Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland; Director-General of the Oce for Consumer Protection, Finland; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 18 January 1995.
Rojena leta 1942; doktorica pravnih znanosti na Univerzi v Helsinkih; asistentka za civilno in gospodarsko pravo na Univerzi v Helsinkih; direktorica za pravne zadeve in gospodarsko politiko Osrednje trgovinske zbornice Finske; generalna direktorica Uprave za varstvo potrošnikov Finske; sodnica na Sodišču prve stopnje od 18. januarja 1995.
Born 1945; Law graduate of the University of Lund; Judge (assessor), Court of Appeal, Stockholm; Legal adviser and Director-General at the Legal Service of the Trade Department at the Ministry of Foreign Aairs; Judge at the Court of First Instance from 18 January 1995 to 6 October 2006; Judge at the Court of Justice from 7 October 2006.
Rojena leta 1945; diploma na Univerzi v Lundu; sodnica (prisednica) na Pritožbenem sodišču v mestu Stockholm; pravnica in generalna direktorica pravne službe na oddelku za trgovino ministrstva za zunanje zadeve; sodnica na Sodišču prve stopnje od 18. januarja 1995 do 6. oktobra 2006.
Born 1948; Doctor of Laws and Bachelor of Sociology and Economics of the University of Vienna; Lecturer and senior lecturer at the Vienna School of Economics and the Faculty of Law of the University of Vienna; Ministerialrat and Head of Department at the Federal Chancellery; Member of the Steering Committee on Legal Cooperation of the Council of Europe (CDCJ); Representative ad litem before the Verfassungsgerichtshof (Constitutional Court) in proceedings for review of the constitutionality of federal laws; Coordinator responsible for the adaptation of Austrian federal law to Community law; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 18 January 1995.
Rojen leta 1948; doktor pravnih znanosti in magister sociologije in ekonomije na Univerzi na Dunaju; predavatelj na Gospodarski univerzi na Dunaju in na Pravni fakulteti Univerze na Dunaju; ministrski svetnik in predstojnik oddelka v Uradu zveznega kanclerja; član pripravljalnega odbora za pravno sodelovanje Sveta Evrope (CDCJ); zastopnik pred Ustavnim sodiščem v postopkih presoje ustavnosti zveznih zakonov; koordinator, pristojen za prilagoditev avstrijskega zveznega prava pravu Skupnosti; sodnik na Sodišču prve stopnje od 18. januarja 1995.
Born 1944; called to the Bar of Ireland 1966; admitted also to the Bars of England and Wales, of Northern Ireland and of New South Wales; Practising barrister 1966–96; admitted to the Inner Bar in Ireland (Senior Counsel) 1980 and New South Wales 1991; President of the Council of the Bars and Law Societies of the European Community (CCBE) 1985–86; Visiting Fellow, Faculty of Law, University College Dublin; Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; President of the Royal Zoological Society of Ireland 1987–90; Bencher of the Honorable Society of Kings Inns, Dublin; Honorary Bencher of Lincoln’s Inn, London; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 10 January 1996.
Rojen leta 1944; leta 1966 postane„barrister“ (odvetnik) na Irskem; prav tako„barrister“ (odvetnik) v Angliji in Walesu, Severni Irski in v Novem Južnem Walesu; odvetnik med letoma 1966 in 1996; leta 1980 postane član Inner Bar na Irskem (Senior Counsel) in leta 1991 v Novem Južnem Walesu; predsednik Posvetovalne komisije odvetniških zbornic Evropske skupnosti (CCBE) med letoma 1985 in 1986; gostujoči profesor na Pravni fakulteti University College v Dublinu; član Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; predsednik Royal Zoological Society Irske med letoma 1987 in 1990; član uprave Honorable Society of Kings Inns, Dublin; častni član uprave Lincoln’s Inn, London; sodnik na Sodišču prve stopnje od 10. januarja 1996.
Born 1954; lawyer; attaché de justice, delegated to the Public Attorney’s Oce; Judge, Vice-President of the Luxembourg District Court; teacher at the Centre universitaire de Luxembourg (Luxembourg University Centre); member of the judiciary on secondment, Legal Secretary at the Court of Justice from 1986; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 11 July 1996.
Rojen leta 1945; odvetnik; attaché de justice, dodeljen državnemu tožilstvu (procureur général); sodnik, podpredsednik Tribunal d’arrondissement Luxembourg; docent na Centre universitaire de Luxembourg; dodeljeni sodnik, strokovni sodelavec na Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti od leta 1986; sodnik na Sodišču prve stopnje od 11. julija 1996.
Born 1940; academic assistant at the University of Marburg; Doctor of Laws (University of Marburg); adviser, subsequently head of the section for private international law and, finally, head of a subdivision for civil law in the German Federal Ministry of Justice; member of the Governing Council of Unidroit (1993–98); chairman of the commission of the Hague Conference on Private International Law to draw up the Convention concerning the protection of children (1996); honorary professor at the University of Trier (private international law, international procedural law, European law); member of the Scientic Advisory Board of the Max Planck Institute for Foreign Private and Private International Law in Hamburg since 2002; Judge at the Court of First Instance since 11 June 1997.
Rojen leta 1940; znanstveni asistent na Univerzi v Marburgu; doktor pravnih znanosti (Univerza v Marburgu); referent, pozneje predstojnik referata za mednarodno zasebno pravo, nazadnje predstojnik pododdelka za civilno pravo v Zveznem pravosodnem ministrstvu; član Upravnega sveta pri Unidroit (1993–1998); predsednik komisije Haaške konference o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu za izdelavo Konvencije o varstvu otrok (1996); honorarni profesor na Univerzi v Trieru (mednarodno zasebno in procesno pravo, evropsko pravo); od leta 2002 član strokovnega sosveta Instituta Max-Planck za tuje in mednarodno zasebno pravo v Hamburgu; sodnik na Sodišču prve stopnje od 11. junija 1997.
Born 1938; Professor of International Law and holder of the Jean Monnet Chair of European Community law at the University of Bologna; Doctor honoris causa of the Carlos III University, Madrid; visiting professor at the Johns Hopkins University (Bologna Center), the Universities of St Johns (New York), Georgetown, Paris-II and Georgia (Athens) and the Institut universitaire international (Luxembourg); coordinator of the European Business Law Pallas Program of the University of Nijmegen; member of the consultative committee of the Commission of the European Communities on public procurement; Under-Secretary of State for Trade and Industry during the Italian tenure of the Presidency of the Council; member of the working group of the European Community on the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and director of the 1997 session of the research centre of The Hague Academy of International Law, devoted to the WTO; Judge at the Court of First Instance from 4 March 1998 to 3 May 2006; Advocate General at the Court of Justice since 4 May 2006.
Rojen leta 1938; profesor za mednarodno pravo in predstojnik katedre Jean Monnet za pravo Evropskih skupnosti Univerze v Bologni; doktor honoris causa Univerze Carlos III v Madridu; gostujoči profesor na univerzah Johns Hopkins (Bologna Center), St. Johns (New York), Georgetown, Paris-II in Georgia (Athens) ter na Institut universitaire international (Luxembourg); koordinator programa European Business Law Pallas Program, ki se izvaja na Univerzi v Nijmegnu; član posvetovalnega odbora Komisije Evropskih skupnosti za javna naročila; državni podsekretar za industrijo in trgovino za čas trajanja polletnega italijanskega predsedovanja Svetu; član delovne skupine Evropske skupnosti o Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji (STO) in direktor zasedanja Centra za raziskave Akademije mednarodnega prava v Haagu leta 1997, ki je bilo posvečeno STO; sodnik na Sodišču prve stopnje od 4. marca 1998 do 3. maja 2006; generalni pravobranilec na Sodišču od 4. maja 2006.
Born 1944; Justice at the Supreme Court of the Netherlands (1996); Judge and Vice-President at the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven (Administrative Court for Trade and Industry) (1986); Judge Substitute at the Court of Appeal for Social Security, and Substitute Member of the Administrative Court for Customs Ta ri Matters; Legal Secretary at the Court of Justice of the European Communities (1980); Lecturer in European Law in the Law Faculty of the University of Groningen and Research Assistant at the University of Michigan Law School; Staff Member of the International Secretariat of the Amsterdam Chamber of Commerce (1970); Judge at the Court of First Instance since 17 September 1998.
Rojen leta 1944; sodnik na Vrhovnem sodišču Nizozemske (1996); sodnik in podpredsednik College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Višje upravno sodišče za trgovino in industrijo) (1986); začasni sodnik na Centrale Raad van Beroep (Pritožbeno sodišče za socialno varnost) in na Tariefcommissie (Komisija za carinsko tarifo); strokovni sodelavec na Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti (1980); strokovni sodelavec za evropsko pravo na Pravni fakulteti Univerze v Groningenu in raziskovalec (research-assistant) na University of Michigan Law School; član mednarodnega sekretariataTrgovinske zbornice v Amsterdamu (1970); sodnik na Sodišču prve stopnje od 17. septembra 1998.