natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
These exceptional circumstances do not exempt the Member State from the obligation to inform the Commission of the planned measures and clearly justify its request for urgency at the time when the text is communicated.
Ta posebna in manj stroga oblika klavzule je predvidena izkljuｲno na podroｲju «nanｲnihstoritevinformacijske dru™be zaradi nekaterih nevarnosti in zahtev, ki so znaｲilne za ta sektor.
› ful«ltheobligationsarisingoutofinternationalagreementswhich result in the adoption of common technical speci«ca-tions or rules on services in the Community;
› usklajujejo z zavezujoｲimi predpisi Skupnosti, kar ima za posle-dico sprejetje tehniｲnih speci«kacijalipredpisovostoritvah;
In practice, the Commission carries out a very thorough analy-sis of the reasons given, on the basis of the two criteria con-tained in this paragraph: the seriousness of the situation and (apart from «nancialservices)itsunforeseeablenature.
› izpolnjujejo obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz mednarodnih sporazu-mov, katerih posledica je sprejetje skupnih tehniｲnih speci«kacijali predpisov o storitvah v Skupnosti;
If the Commission considers that these criteria are not met, it disputes the ju s t i « c a t i o n o fu r g e n c y ; c o n v e r s e l y , t h e C o m m i s - s i o n may accept application of this procedure.
Zaradi teh posebnih okoliþｲin dr™ava ｲlanica ni izvzeta iz ob-veznosti, da obveþｲa Komisijo o naｲrtovanih ukrepih in da jas-no utemelji svojo zahtevo po nujnosti takrat, ko sporoｲi besedi-lo.
This does not prejudice the Commission's assessment on the merits, namely its analysis of whether the measure adopted may form a barrier to trade in any way.
Komisija mora oceniti, ali je uporaba nujnega postopka utemeljena, in ｲimprej dati svoje mnenje o sporoｲilu.
If the Member States adopt the same set of rules as required by a Community Directive, trade barriers and di.erencesbetweennational laws are removed at the same time, and the procedure laid down by Directive 98/34/EC is no longer needed.
Omejitve za to izjemo se lahko najbolje prika™ejo s skliceva-njem na osnovni cilj Direktive, ki je odprava neupraviｲenih trgovinskih ovir.
This reasoning is the same with regard to international agree-ments: when such an agreement contains precise provisions and there is no scope for divergence, the adoption by the t w e n - t y - « v e Mffe mb e r S t a t e s o f a u n i f o r m s e t o f r u l e s i s n o t , i n p r i n c i - p l e , likely to result in trade barriers.
V praksi Komisija zelo temeljito analizira dane razloge na pod-lagi dveh meril, vsebovanih v tem odstavku: resnosti situacije in (razen «nanｲnihstoritev)njenenepredvidljivenarave.
A c c o r d i n g t o t h e C o u r t , t h i s p r o v i s i o n i s d r a ft e d i n g e n e r a l terms which leaves su/cientroomformanoeuvreforitto be concluded that national rules on labelling relating to the origin of olive oil cannot be regarded as national provisions conforming to a binding Community act within the meaning of the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 1 0 ( 1 ) o ft h e N o t i « c a t i o n D i r e c t i v e .
Pe dr™ave ｲlanice sprejmejo enake predpise, kot jih zahteva di-rektiva Skupnosti, se hkrati odpravijo trgovinske ovire in razlike med nacionalnimi zakonodajami, postopek, doloｲen v Direktivi 98/34/ES, pa ni veｲ potreben.
The situation is d i . e r e n t w h e n t h e C o m mstu n i t y a c t o r t h e i n t e r - n a t i o n a l agreement is implemented through measures which may d i . e r f r o m o n e Mffe mb e r S t a t e t o a n o t h e r , o r w h e n u n i f o r m p r o v i s i o n s , which have to be transposed, are supplemented by rules which are of purely national origin.
Pe Komisija meni, da ti dve merili nista izpolnjeni, spodbija upraviｲenost nujnosti; nasprotno lahko Komisija sprejme upo-rabo tega postopka.
Several judgments have clari«edthescopeoftheexceptionlaid down in the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 1 0 ( 1 ) o f D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C , whereby Member States are not obliged to notify texts by means of which they comply with binding Community acts which result in the adoption of technical speci«cationsorruleson Information Society services.
To ne vpliva na oceno Komisije o vsebini, zlasti njeno analizo o tem, ali je sprejeti ukrep lahko na kakrþen koli naｲin trgovinska ovira.
To the extent that the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings transposed Directive 95/47/EC on the use of standards for the transmission of television signals, and to that extent only, there would be no obligation to notify under the N o t i « c a t i o n D i r e c t i v e .
Enako sklepanje velja za mednarodne sporazume: kadar tak sporazum vsebuje natanｲne doloｲbe in ni mo™no odstopanje, sprejetje enakih predpisov v petindvajsetih dr™avah ｲlanicah naｲeloma ne bo povzroｲilo trgovinskih ovir.
Conversely, the Court s p e c i « e d , i n t h e U n i l e v e r ju d g mffe n t that Article 10 of the Directive may not be invoked when a provision of a directive allows the Member State su/cientroomforma-noeuvre. This was the case in point.
Pe se ukrepi, katerih nujnost se spodbija, sprejmejo brez upoþ-tevanja obdobja mirovanja, lahko Komisija proti zadevni dr™avi ｲlanici zaｲne postopek iz ｲlena 226 Pogodbe za ugotavljanje krþitev zaradi krþitve obveznosti, ki jih doloｲa Direktiva.
The same reasoning applies to measures adopted to conform with an international agreement which contains speci«cprovi-sions for the implementation of which no possibility of diver-gence is laid down. Measures adopted to conform with an agreement to which all the Member States are party come
Stanje je drugaｲno, kadar se akt Skupnosti ali mednarodni sporazum izvaja z ukrepi, ki se lahko razlikujejo med dr™avami ｲlanicami, ali kadar enake doloｲbe, ki jih je treba prenesti, nadomestijo predpisi, ki so povsem nacionalnega izvora.
within this exception; if these are measures adopted to con-form with an international agreement to which not all the Member States are party, they must be noti«ed.
Obseg izjeme, doloｲene v prvi alinei ｲlena 10(1) Direktive 98/34/ES, v skladu s katero dr™ave ｲlanice niso obvezane pri-glasiti besedil, s pomoｲjo katerih izpolnjujejo zavezujoｲe akte Skupnosti, ki imajo za posledico sprejetje tehniｲnih speci«kacijali predpisov o storitvah informacijske dru™be, je pojasnilo tudi veｲ sodb.
› make use of safeguard clauses provided for in binding Commu-nity acts; tions to prevent, restrict or impose speci«cconditionsonthepossible marketing or use, within its own territory, of products by reason of a serious risk, it shall immediately notify the Commission thereof through RAPEX.
ukrepe Skupnosti in poslediｲno sprejmejo tehniｲne speci«ka-cije. V obsegu, v katerem je iz Direktive 95/47/ES v zadevno na-cionalno zakonodajo prenesena uporaba standardov za prenos televizijskih signalov v glavnem postopku in samo v tem obse-gu, ni obveznosti priglasitve v skladu z direktivo o priglasitvi.
It shall also inform the Commission without delay of modi«cationorwithdrawalofanysuchmeasureor action („)'.
Ob upoþtevanju vsebine Direktive 95/47/ES pa je Sodiþｲe me-nilo, da se zadevna nacionalna zakonodaja, kolikor je vzposta-vila sistem predhodnih upravnih pooblastil › kar dejansko Di-rektiva 95/47/ES ne doloｲa ›, ne more þteti za zakonodajo, s katero dr™ava ｲlanica izpolnjuje zavezujoｲi ukrep Skupnosti tako, da sprejme tehniｲne speci«kacije.
The Member States do not have to notify the Commission of the draft provisional measures which they are authorised to take under the safeguard clause contained in Community Di-rectives, in accordance with Article 95 of the Treaty.
Ista razlaga se uporablja za ukrepe, sprejete zaradi uskladitve z mednarodnim sporazumom, ki vsebuje posebne doloｲbe, za izvedbo katerih ni doloｲene nobene mo™nosti odstopanja.
This Article lays down in paragraph 10 that `The harmonisation measures (....) shall, in appropriate cases, include a safeguard clause author-ising the Member States to take, for one or more of the non-eco-nomic reasons referred to in Article 30, provisional measures sub-ject to a Community control procedure'.
Ukrepi, sprejeti zaradi uskladitve s sporazumom, katerega po-godbenice so dr™ave ｲlanice, so v okviru te izjeme; ｲe so ti ukre-pi sprejeti zaradi izpolnjevanja mednarodnega sporazuma, ka-terega pogodbenice niso vse dr™ave ｲlanice, jih je treba priglasiti.
The Member States do not have to notify national measures which have the sole objective of implementing a judgment of the Court of Justice relating to an aspect other than the noti«-cation of a technical regulation.
› se sklicujejo na zaþｲitne klavzule, doloｲene v zavezujoｲih aktih Skupnosti;
Judgments by this Court, which is responsible for ensuring compliance with Community law, must be enforced immediately.
Nasprotno pa je Sodiþｲe v sodbi Unilever doloｲilo, da sklice-vanje na 10. ｲlen Direktive ni mogoｲe, kadar doloｲba direktive daje dr™avi ｲlanici dovolj manevrskega prostora. To je bil tak primer. Italija je trdila, da je Direktiva Sveta 79/112/EGS o ozna-ｲevanju ™ivil uvedla obveznost, da se v oznaｲevanje vkljuｲijo podrobnosti o kraju porekla ali izvoru proizvoda, kadar bi opuþ-ｲanje takih podrobnosti lahko zavajalo potroþnika glede prave-ga porekla ali izvora ™ivila.
› restrict themselves to amending a technical regulation within the meaning of point 11 of Article 1, in accordance with a Com-mission request, with a view to removing an obstacle to trade or, in the case of rules on services, to the free movement of services or the freedom of establishment of service operators.
Po mnenju Sodiþｲa je ta doloｲba sploþna in daje dovolj manevrskega prostora za ugotovitev, da se nacionalni predpisi o oznaｲevanju, ki se nanaþajo na poreklo oljｲnega olja, ne morejo þteti za nacionalne predpise, ki ustre-zajo zavezujoｲemu aktu Skupnosti v okviru pomena prve alinee ｲlena 10(1) direktive o priglasitvi.
› apply Article 8 (1) of Council Directive 92/59/EEC;
Dr™avam ｲlanicam ni treba Komisiji priglasiti osnutkov zaｲas-nih ukrepov, ki jih lahko sprejmejo v skladu z zaþｲitno klavzulo, vsebovano v direktivah Skupnosti v skladu s ｲlenom 95 Pogod-be.
The Member States do not have to notify draft national techni-cal regulations relating to the application of Article 12 (1) of the Directive on general product safety.
Ta ｲlen v odstavku 10 doloｲa, da ¶(„) usklajevalni ukrepi v ustreznih primerih vkljuｲujejo zaþｲitno klavzulo, ki dovoljuje dr™a-vam ｲlanicam, da zaradi enega ali veｲ neekonomskih razlogov iz ｲlena 30 sprejmejo zaｲasne ukrepe, ki so predmet nadzornega po-stopka Skupnostiƒ.
This Article provides that `where a Member State adopts or de-cides to adopt, recommend or agree with producers and distribu-tors, whether on a compulsory or voluntary basis, measures or ac-
To restriktivno razlago prve alinee ｲlena 10(1) Direktive je So-diþｲe potrdilo v sodbi ¶Canal Satïlite Digitalƒ.
The Member States are not required to notify national meas-ures aimed solely at amending a technical regulation in order to remove obstacles in response to a request, for instance through a detailed opinion or comments, from the Commis-sion (for example, a request for the inclusion of a mutual recog-nition clause, based on Article 28 of the Treaty), since these measures are precisely in accordance with the objective of Di-rective 98/34/EC.
V tej sodbi je So-diþｲe ponovilo, da je iz 10. ｲlena Direktive 98/34/ES razvidno, da se 8. in 9. ｲlen ne uporabljata za zakone in druge predpise dr™av ｲlanic ali za prostovoljne dogovore, v katere dr™ave ｲlani-ce vstopajo, pri ｲemer dr™ave ｲlanice izpolnjujejo zavezujoｲe
The relevant article is Article 12(1) of Directive 2001/95/EC.
I-2947.Zadeva C-443/98 ¶Unileverƒ [2000] Recueil, str.
RAPEX, whose legal basis is Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety, serves as a single rapid alert system for dangerous consumer products.
I-7535.Zadeva C-390/99 ¶Canal Satïlite Digitalƒ [2002] Recueil, str. I-607.
cerning a subject covered by current or imminent Community work, do not apply to voluntary agreements.
Ti neekonomski razlogi se lahko nanaþajo na javno moralo, javni red ali javno varnost, varovanje zdravja in ™ivljenja ljudi, ™ivali ali rastlin, varovanje nacionalnih zakladov umetniþke ali arheoloþke vrednosti ali varovanje industrijske in poslovne lastnine.
Article 9 (3) to (6) shall not apply to the voluntary agreements referred to in the second indent of the second subparagraph of point 11 of Article 1.
Plen 9 se ne uporablja za tehniｲne speci«kacijealidrugezahte-ve ali predpise o storitvah iz tretje alinee drugega pododstavka toｲke 11 ｲlena 1.
It may be concluded from the reading of Articles 8, 9 and 10 of Directive 98/34/EC that the information procedure applicable to technical regulations is quite complex.
Ta ｲlen doloｲa, da ¶kadar dr™ava ｲlanica na svojem ozemlju sprej-me ukrepe ali preventivne ukrepe za prepreｲitev, omejitev ali uve-ljavitev posebnih pogojev za morebitno tr™enje ali uporabo proiz-vodov zaradi resne nevarnosti ali se odloｲi take ukrepe sprejeti, jih priporoｲiti ali se s proizvajalci in distributerji o njih dogovoriti, bo-disi obvezno ali prostovoljno, to nemudoma sporoｲi Komisiji prek RAPEX.
The handbook pro-duced by the Commission departments explains in detail how the procedure operates in practice.
Komisijo nemudoma obvesti tudi o spremembi ali umiku katerega koli ukrepa ali preventivnega ukrepa („)ƒ.
Under the terms of paragraphs (2) and (4), a standstill period does not apply to measures seeking to prohibit manufacturing, to the extent that these do not obstruct the free movement of goods within the Community, or to technical speci«cationsorother requirements or rules on services linked to «scalor«nan-cial measures.
Pod pogoji iz odstavkov (2) in (4) se obdobje mirovanja ne upo-rablja za ukrepe, katerih namen je prepoved proizvodnje, koli-kor slednji ne ovirajo prostega pretoka blaga med dr™avami ｲlanicami Skupnosti, ali za tehniｲne speci«kacijealidrugeza-hteve ali predpise o storitvah, povezane z davｲnimi ali «nanｲni-mi ukrepi.
Furthermore, the Directive's provisions on technical regulations impose very strict obligations on the Member States (much more restrictive than those applicable to standards), which are balanced by the right to react to draft national regulations be-ing prepared by other Member States and by the saving of time and of much more complex procedures, both at Community and national levels, which would result from ex post procedures purely limited at removing already existing regulatory obsta-cles.
Dr™avam ｲlanicam ni treba priglasiti nacionalnih ukrepov, kate-rih edini cilj je izvajanje sodbe Sodiþｲa, ki se nanaþa na drug vidik in ne na priglasitev tehniｲnega predpisa. Sodbe Sodiþｲa, ki je odgovorno za zagotavljanje skladnosti z zakonodajo Skup-nosti, je treba takoj izvajati.
In the «rstcase,itisobviousthatpostponementoftheadop-tion of measures only makes sense if the manufacturing prohi-bitions present a potential risk of constituting a technical bar-rier to trade in the internal market.
V prvem primeru je oｲitno, da je odlog sprejetja ukrepov smi-seln samo, ｲe prepovedi pri proizvodnji predstavljajo morebit-no tveganje za vzpostavitev tehniｲne ovire v trgovini na notra-njem trgu.
In the second case, it was considered inopportune to require postponement of adoption of measures linked to the « s c a l s y s t e m o ft h e Mffe mb e r S t a t e s .
V drugem primeru se je þtelo za neustrezno, da se zahteva odlog sprejetja ukrepov, povezanih z davｲnim siste-mom dr™av ｲlanic.
Where the Member States fail to meet their obligation to com-municate their draft technical regulations to the Commission, or do not observe the standstill periods laid down in the Direc-tive, the Commission can institute infringement proceedings, under Article 226 of the Treaty, as already mentioned.
› se omejijo na spreminjanje tehniｲnih predpisov v smislu toｲke 11 ｲlena 1 v skladu z zahtevo Komisije, da bi odstranile ovire v trgovi-ni ali pri predpisih o storitvah ovire v prostem pretoku storitev ali svobodi ustanavljanja dobaviteljev storitev.
When the Member State concerned does not comply, the pro-cedure leads to a judgment of failure to fu l « l o b l i g a t i o n s b y t h e C o u r t of Justice.
Direktiva z dne 29. junija 1992 o sploþni varnosti proizvodov, UL L 228, 11.8.1992, str. 24.
As far as draft regulations concerning «scalor«nancialmeas-ures are concerned, the absence of the standstill obligation for the notifying Member State does not exclude the Commission or another Member State from reacting to these drafts by means of comments or detailed opinions (See Article 8 (1)).
Ta direktiva je bila preklicana z Direktivo 2001/95/ES z dne 3. decem-bra 2001 o sploþni varnosti proizvodov. Ustrezni ｲlen je ｲlen 12(1) Direktive 2001/95/ES.
Private individuals can, for their part, rely on the fact that tech-nical regulations with which they are required to comply, but which have not been noti«ed,cannotbeenforcedagainst
RAPEX, katerega pravna podlaga je Direktiva 2001/95/ES o sploþni varnosti proizvodov, slu™i kot samostojen sistem nadziranja za proizvode, nevarne za po-troþnika.
Standing Committee Document 94/94 - « n a l o f 8 Juffn e 1 9 9 5 a n d S t a n d i n g C o m m i t t e e D o c u mffe n t S - 4 2 / 9 8 ( d e f ) . R e f e r e n c e is made to these judgments in Point V of the bibliography.
Vsi ne™ivilski proizvodi, ki so namenjeni potroþnikom ali bi jih ti pod razumnimi predvidljivimi pogoji lahko uporabljali, so vkljuｲeni v obseg RAPEX, razen farmacevtskih in medicinskih proizvodov.
them.Furthermore, the Unilever judgment laid down that even a measure which is noti«edbutwhichissubsequentlyadopted during the standstill period laid down in Article 9 of Directive 98/34/EC, cannot be enforced against individuals.
te™ene s pravico do odziva na osnutke nacionalnih predpisov, ki jih pripravijo druge dr™ave ｲlanice, in s prihrankom ｲasa ter zahtevnejþih postopkov na ravni Skupnosti in na nacionalni ravni, ki bi izhajali iz postopkov ex post, omejenih samo na od-stranjevanje obstojeｲih normativnih ovir.
Case C-194/94 `CIA Security' [1996] ECR I-2201 and Case C-226/97 `Lemmens' [1998] ECR I-3711.Case C-443/98 `Unilever' [2000] ECR I-7535.
V zvezi z osnutki predpisov o davｲnih ali «nanｲnihukrepihod-sotnost obveznosti obdobja mirovanja za dr™avo ｲlanico pri-glasiteljico ne pomeni, da se Komisija ali druga dr™ava ｲlanica ne smeta odzvati na te osnutke s pripombami ali podrobnimi mnenji (glej ｲlen 8(1)).
Chapter IV: The Standing Committee
Priroｲnik, ki so ga pripravile slu™be Komisije, podrobneje razlo™i, kako postopek deluje v praksi.
› identify the areas where harmonisation appears necessary, and, should the case arise, undertake appropriate harmonisa-tion in a given sector.
Sodba Unilever je doloｲila, da se tudi ukrep, ki je priglaþen, a je bil naknadno sprejet med obdo-bjem mirovanja, doloｲenim v ｲlenu 9 Direktive 98/34/ES, ne more izvajati proti posameznikom.
b) when drawing up the rules for the consolidated presentation of information and the plan and criteria for the presentation of standards programmes (Article 2 (2));
Dokument stalnega odbora 94/94 › konｲ. z dne 8. junija 1995 in dokument stalnega odbora S-42/98 (konｲ).Sklic na te sodbe je v V. toｲki bibliogra«je.Zadeva C-194/94 ¶CIA Securityƒ [1996] Recueil, str. I-2201 in zadeva C-226/97 ¶Lemmensƒ [1998] Recueil, str.
The Committee shall meet at least twice a year with the repre-sentatives of the standards institutions referred to in Annexes I and II.
(b) pri sestavljanju pravil za celotno prestavitev informacij ter naｲrtov in meril za predstavitev programov standardov (ｲlen 2(2));
d) when reviewing the operation of the system set up by this Direc-tive;
(c) pri odloｲanju o dejanskem sistemu, po katerem se opravlja izmenjava informacij, doloｲena v tej direktivi, kakor tudi pri njegovih morebitnih spremembah;
e) on the requests to the standards institutions referred to in the «rstindentofparagraph 3.
(d) pri pregledovanju delovanja sistema, doloｲenega v tej direk-tivi;
The Committee may be consulted by the Commission on any preliminary draft technical regulation received by the latter.
(e) ob zahtevah standardizacijskim organom, navedenim v prvi alinei odstavka 3.
The Commission shall submit to the Committee a report on the implementation and application of the procedures set out in this Directive, and shall present proposals aimed at eliminating exist-ing or foreseeable barriers to trade.
Odbor se mora sestati s predstavniki standardizacijskih orga-nov, ki so navedeni v prilogah I in II, najmanj dvakrat na leto.
Any question regarding the implementation of this Directive may be submitted to the Committee at the request of its Chairman or of a Member State.
Komisija se lahko posvetuje z odborom o vsakem predhodnem osnutku tehniｲnega predpisa, ki ga prejme Komisija.
The proceedings of the Committee and the information to be submitted to it shall be con«dential.
Kakrþno koli vpraþanje v zvezi z izvajanjem te direktive se lahko predlo™i odboru na ™eljo njegovega predsednika ali dr™ave ｲlanice.
› request the European standards institutions to draw up a Euro-pean standard within a given time limit,
› od evropskih standardizacijskih organov zahteva, da v danem roku pripravijo evropski standard,
However, the Committee and the national authorities may, provided that the necessary precautions are taken, consult, for an expert opin-ion, natural or legal persons, including persons in the private sector.
Vendar pa se lahko odbor in dr™avni organi, da bi dobili strokovno mnenje, posvetujejo s «ziｲnimialipravnimiosebami,vkljuｲnozosebami v zasebnem sektorju, ｲe so sprejeti potrebni varnostni ukrepi.
› ensure where necessary, in order to avoid the risk of barriers to trade, that initially the Member States concerned decide amongst themselves on appropriate measures,
› doloｲi podroｲja, na katerih se uskladitev zdi potrebna, in se po potrebi loti ustrezne uskladitve na danem podroｲju.
With respect to rules on services, the Commission and the Com-mittee may consult natural or legal persons from industry or
Glede predpisov o storitvah se lahko Komisija in odbor posvetu-jeta s «ziｲnimialipravnimiosebamiizgospodarskihaliakadem-skih krogov, in kadar je mogoｲe, predstavniþkimi organi, ki lahko dajo strokovno mnenje o dru™benih in socialnih ciljih in posledi-cah kakrþnega koli osnutka predpisa o storitvah, ter upoþtevata njihovo mnenje, kadarkoli se to od njiju zahteva.
academia, and where possible representative bodies, capable of delivering an expert opinion on the social and societal aims and consequences of any draft rule on services, and take notice of their advice whenever requested to do so.
Komisija se mora z njim posvetovati tudi glede nekaterih zadev, vkljuｲno z izbiro sistema, ki naj se uporablja v praksi za izmenjavo informacij, doloｲenih v Direktivi.
8 (4), the Member States expressly request that noti«cationswhich they have carried out be treated con«dentiallyasanex-ception.
Odbor sestavljajo predstavniki nacionalnih organov dr™av ｲla-nic in mu predseduje predstavnik Komisije.
In this case, the Committee must take the necessary precautions in order to safeguard the legitimate and duly ju s t i - « e d i n t e r e s t s o ft h e Mffe mb e r S t a t e s .
Pristojen je za stan-darde in tehniｲne predpise in je osrednja toｲka za razprave o te™avah v zvezi z izvajanjem Direktive.
Articles 5 and 6 describe the composition and role of the Stand-ing Committee, which is referred to repeatedly in the provisions of Directive 98/34/EC.
Ima pomembno vlogo pri nadziranju delovanja postopka in pregledu vpraþanj politi-ke, ki nastanejo s priglasitvijo, ter pri razvoju upravnega omre™-ja med nacionalnimi organi.
Because of its varied responsibilities, the Standing Committee has general powers, common to the two aspects of Directive 98/34/EC, and speci«cpowerslimitedtoeachofthem.
Spodbujanje takega dialoga je v skladu z duhom Direktive 98/34/ES, ki ™eli odstraniti ovire pri viru s prepreｲevanjem bolj kot s prisilo.
The Committee is composed of representatives of the Member States' national authorities and chaired by a representative of the Commission.
Dr™ave ｲlanice in Komisija so se dogovorile o pravilih delovanja tega organa, saj Direktiva doloｲa, da odbor pripravi svoj poslovnik.