natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
— charges to cover initial implementation of the physical interconnection, based on the costs of providing the specific interconnection requested (e.g. specific equipment and resources; compatibility testing),
– stro�ki, s katerimi se krije vzpostavitev fizične medomrežne povezave in ki temeljijo na stro�kih namestitve posamezne zahtevane medomrežne povezave (npr. posebna oprema in naprave, preverjanje združljivosti),
— rental charges to cover the on-going use of equipment and resources (connection maintenance, etc.),
– stro�ki najema, s katerimi se krije redna uporaba opreme in naprav (vzdrževanje povezave itd.),
— variable charges for ancillary and supplementary services (e.g. access to directory services; operator assistance; data collection; charging; billing; switch-based and advanced services etc.),
– spremenljivi stro�ki pomožnih in dodatnih storitev (npr. dostop do imenika, pomoč telefonista, zbiranje podatkov, obračunavanje, izstavljanje računov, storitve komutiranja in napredne storitve itd.),
— traffic related charges, for the conveyance of traffic to and from the interconnected network (e.g. the costs of switching and transmission), which may be on a per minute basis, and/or on the basis of additional network capacity required.
– stro�ki prometa, ki nastanejo s prometom do in od povezanega omrežja (npr. stro�ki komutiranja in prenosa) in se lahko izračunavajo na minuto in/ali na osnovi dodatne zmogljivosti omrežja, ki se zahteva.
Tariff elements refer to the individual prices set for each network component or facility provided to the interconnected party.
‚Elementi cene‘ so posamezno določene cene za vsak omrežni element ali napravo, ki se zagotavlja povezani stranki.
Tariffs and charges for interconnection must follow the principles of costorientation and transparency, in accordance with Article 7(2).
Cene in pristojbine za medomrežno povezovanje morajo upo�tevati načeli stro�kovne naravnanosti in preglednosti v skladu s členom 7(2).
Annex V to Directive 97/33, entitled ‘Cost accounting systems for interconnection’, indicates, by way of example, some elements which may be included in such accounting systems.
Priloga V k Direktivi 97/33 z naslovom „Sistemi stro�kovnega računovodstva za medomrežno povezovanje“ primeroma navaja nekaj elementov, ki jih je mogoče vključiti v zgoraj navedene sisteme. V tej prilogi je navedeno:
‘Article 7(5) calls for details of the cost accounting system; the list below indicates, by way of example, some elements which may be included in such accounting systems.
„V členu 7(5) je predvidena podrobna predstavitev sistema stro�kovnega računovodstva; v spodnjem seznamu je primeroma navedenih nekaj elementov, ki jih je mogoče vključiti v ta računovodski sistem.
The purpose of publishing this information is to provide transparency in the calculation of interconnection charges, so that other market players are in a position to ascertain that the charges have been fairly and properly calculated.
Z objavo teh podatkov se zagotavlja preglednost izračunavanja pristojbin za medomrežno povezovanje, s čimer se lahko drugi udeleženci na trgu prepričajo, da so bile pristojbine izračunane pravično in pravilno.
This objective should be taken into account by the [NRA] and the organisations affected when determining the level of detail in the information published.
[NRO] in zadevni subjekti morajo pri določanju tega, kako podrobni bodo objavljeni podatki, upo�tevati ta cilj.
The list below indicates the elements to be included in the information published.
V spodnjem seznamu so navedeni elementi, ki jih morajo vključevati objavljeni podatki.
including the cost base(s) used, i.e. historic costs (based on actual expenditure incurred for equipment and systems) or forwardlooking costs (based on estimated replacement costs of equipment or systems).
Na primer popolnoma porazdeljeni stro�ki, povprečni dolgoročni mejni stro�ki, mejni stro�ki, neodvisni stro�ki, neposredni vloženi stro�ki itd., vključno z uporabljano stro�kovno osnovo oziroma uporabljenimi stro�kovnimi osnovami, torej plačanimi stro�ki (ki temeljijo na dejansko nastalih stro�kih za opremo in sisteme) ali predvidenimi stro�ki (ki temeljijo na oceni stro�kov za zamenjavo opreme in sistemov).
The cost elements included in the interconnection tariff
Stro�kovni elementi, vključeni v ceno medomrežnega povezovanja
Identification of all the individual cost components which together make up the interconnection charge, including the profit element.
Navedba vseh posameznih stro�kovnih elementov, ki skupaj sestavljajo pristojbino za medomrežno povezovanje, vključno z donosom.
The degrees and methods of cost allocation, in particular the treatment of joint and common costs
Stopnje in načini porazdelitve stro�kov, zlasti obravnavanje povezanih in skupnih stro�kov
Details of the degree to which direct costs are analysed, and the degree and method by which joint and common costs are included in interconnection charges.
Podrobnosti v zvezi s stopnjo analiziranja neposrednih stro�kov in stopnja ter način vključitve povezanih in skupnih stro�kov v pristojbine za medomrežno povezovanje.
Accounting conventions i.e. the accounting conventions used for the treatment of costs covering:
To so računovodski dogovori, ki se uporabljajo za obravnavanje stro�kov, ki zajemajo:
— the timescale for depreciation of major categories of fixed asset (e.g. land, buildings, equipment, etc.),
– amortizcijsko dobo glavnih kategorij osnovnih sredstev (na primer zemlji�ča, zgradbe, oprema itd.),
— the treatment, in terms of revenue versus capital cost, of other major expenditure items (e.g. computer software and systems, research and development, new business development, direct and indirect construction, repairs and maintenance, finance charges, etc.)
– obravnavanje drugih večjih stro�kov, ki se pri�tevajo med kapitalske prihodke ali stro�ke (na primer programska oprema in informacijski sistemi, raziskave in razvoj, poslovni razvoj, neposredni in posredni gradbeni stro�ki, popravila in vzdrževanje, finančni stro�ki itd.).
Directive 98/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 1998 on the application of open network provision (ONP) to voice telephony and on universal service for telecommunications in a competitive environment (OJ 1998 L 101, p.
Direktiva 98/10/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. februarja 1998 o uporabi sistema zagotavljanja odprtosti omrežij (ONP) pri govorni telefoniji in o univerzalnih storitvah za telekomunikacije v konkurenčnem okolju (UL L 101, str.
24), applicable at the material time in the main proceedings, is intended, according to Article 1 thereof, to ensure the harmonisation of conditions for open and efficient access to and use of fixed public telephone networks and fixed public telephone services in an environment of open and competitive markets, in accordance with the principles of open network provision.
24), ki je veljala v času nastanka dejstev v postopku v glavni stvari, v skladu s členom 1 ureja usklajevanje pogojev za odprt in učinkovit dostop do javnih fiksnih telefonskih omrežij in javnih fiksnih telefonskih storitev ter za njihovo uporabo v okolju odprtih in konkurenčnih trgov v skladu z načeli zagotavljanja odprtosti omrežij.
Article 17 of that directive, entitled ‘Tariff principles’, provides:
Člen 17 te direktive z naslovom „Načela oblikovanja cen“ določa:
Tariffs for use of the fixed public telephone network and fixed public telephone services shall follow the basic principles of costorientation set out in [the] annex … to Directive 90/387/EEC.
Cene za uporabo javnega fiksnega telefonskega omrežja in javnih fiksnih telefon -skih storitev upo�tevajo temeljna načela stro�kovne naravnanosti iz Priloge […] k Direktivi 90/387/EGS.
Without prejudice to Article 7(3) of Directive 97/33/EC on Interconnection, tariffs for access to and use of the fixed public telephone network shall be independent of the type of application which the users implement, except to the extent that they require different services or facilities.
Ne glede na člen 7(3) Direktive 97/33/ES o medomrežnem povezovanju so cene dostopa do javnega fiksnega omrežja in njegova uporaba neodvisne od vrste uporabe, ki jo izvajajo uporabniki, razen če potrebujejo drugačne storitve ali drugačne dodatne storitve.
Article 18(1) and (2) of that directive, entitled ‘Cost accounting principles’, provides:
Člen 18(1) in (2) navedene direktive z naslovom „Načela stro�kovnega računovodstva“ določa:
Member States shall ensure that, where an organisation has an obligation for its tariffs to follow the principle of costorientation in accordance with Article 17, the cost accounting systems operated by such organisations are suitable for the implementation of Article 17 and that compliance with such systems [is] verified by a competent body which is independent of those organisations.
Če morajo subjekti upo�tevati načela stro�kovne naravnanosti v skladu s členom 17, morajo države članice zagotoviti, da so sistemi stro�kovnega računovodstva, ki jih uporabljajo ti subjekti, primerni za izvajanje člena 17 in da skladnost s temi sistemi nadzoruje usposobljen organ, ki deluje neodvisno od teh subjektov.
[NRAs] shall ensure that a statement concerning compliance is published annually.
[NRO] zagotovijo, da se izjava o skladnosti objavi vsako leto.
[NRAs] shall ensure that a description of the cost accounting systems referred to in paragraph 1, showing the main categories under which costs are compiled and the rules used for the allocation of costs to voice telephony services, is made available to them on request.
[NRO] morajo zagotoviti, da je na zahtevo na voljo opis sistema stro�kovnega računovodstva iz odstavka 1, ki vključuje glavne kategorije, po katerih so stro�ki razvr�čeni v skupine, in pravila, ki se uporabljajo za razporeditev stro�kov za storitve govorne telefonije.
National regulatory authorities shall submit to the Commission, on request, information on the cost accounting systems applied by the organisations concerned.’
Na zahtevo sporočijo Komisiji podatke o sistemu stro�kovnega računovodstva, ki ga uporabljajo zadevni subjekti.“
— Recommendation 98/195/EC
– Priporočilo 98/195/ES
On 8 April 1998 the Commission adopted Recommendation 98/195/EC on interconnection in a liberalised telecommunications market (Part 1 — Interconnection pricing) (OJ 1998 L 73, p. 42).
Komisija je 8. januarja 1998 sprejela Priporočilo 98/195/ES o medomrežnem povezovanju na liberaliziranem telekomunikacijskem trgu (Del 1 – Oblikovanje cen za medomrežno povezovanje) (UL L 73, str. 42).
— Recommendation 98/322/EC
– Priporočilo 98/322/ES
On 8 April 1998 the Commission adopted, pursuant to Article 7(5) of Direct- ive 97/33, Recommendation 98/322/EC on interconnection in a liberalised telecommunications market (Part 2 — Accounting separation and cost accounting) (OJ 1998 L 141, p. 6).
Komisija je 8. aprila 1998 na podlagi člena 7(5) Direktive 97/33 sprejela Priporočilo 98/322/ES o medomrežnem povezovanju na liberaliziranem telekomunikacijskem trgu (Del 2 – Ločeno računovodstvo in stro�kovno računovodstvo) (UL L 141, str. 6).
— Recommendation 2000/417/EC
– Priporočilo 2000/417/ES
On 25 May 2000 the Commission adopted Recommendation 2000/417/EC on unbundled access to the local loop to enable the competitive provision of a full range of electronic communications services including broadband multimedia and highspeed Internet (OJ 2000 L 156, p. 44).
Komisija je 25. maja 2000 sprejela Priporočilo 2000/417/ES o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke, ki omogoča konkurenčno ponudbo polnega obsega storitev elektronskega komuniciranja, vključno s �irokopasovnimi multimediji in internetom visoke hitrosti (UL L 156, str. 44).
— The Communication on unbundled access to the local loop
– Sporočilo o razvezanem dostopu do krajevne zanke
On 23 September 2000 the Commission published Communication 2000/C 272/10 ‘Unbundled access to the local loop: enabling the competitive provision of a full range of electronic communication services, including broadband multimedia and highspeed Internet’.
Komisija je 23. septembra 2000 objavila Sporočilo 2000/C 272/10 „Razvezan dostop do krajevne zanke: omogoča konkurenčne ponudbe celotnega obsega elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, vključno s �irokopasovnimi multimediji in visokohitrostnim internetom“.
The new regulatory framework
Nov regulativni okvir
On 7 March 2002 the European Council and the Parliament adopted four directives concerning the new regulatory framework applicable to electronic communications
Evropski parlament in Svet sta 7. marca 2002 sprejela �tiri direktive za oblikovanje novega regulativnega okvira za elektronske komunikacije (v nadaljevanju: NovRO), in sicer Direktivo 2002/19/ES o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju (direktiva o dostopu) (UL L 108, str. 7), Direktivo 2002/20/ES o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih
7), Directive 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
ARCOR omrežij in storitev (direktiva o odobritvi) (UL L 108, str.
21), Directive 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
21), Direktivo 2002/21/ES o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (okvirna direktiva) (UL L 108, str.
33), and Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 51).
33) in Direktivo 2002/22/ES o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami (direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah) (UL L 108, str. 51).
Article 26 and the second subparagraph of Article 28(1) of Directive 2002/21 repeal, inter alia, Directives 90/387, 97/33 and 98/10 with effect from 25 July 2003.
Člena 26 in 28(1), drugi pododstavek, Direktive 2002/21 med drugim razveljavljata direktive 90/387, 97/33 in 98/10, z veljavnostjo od 25. julija 2003.
Pursuant to Article 19 of Directives 2002/19 and 2002/20, Article 29 of Direct- ive 2002/21 and Article 39 of Directive 2002/22, those directives entered into force on the day of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities, in this case, on 24 April 2002.
Člen 19 direktiv 2002/19 in 2002/20, člen 29 Direktive 2002/21 in člen 39 Direktive 2002/22 določajo, da začnejo navedene direktive veljati na dan objave v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti, v tem primeru 24. aprila 2002.
The Law on telecommunications
Zakon o telekomunikacijah
Paragraph 24 of the Law on telecommunications (Telekommunikationsgesetz) of 25 July 1996 (BGBl 1996 I, p.
Člen 24 zakona o telekomunikacijah (Telekommunikationsgesetz) z dne 25. julija 1996 (BGBl. 1996 I, str.
1120; ‘the TKG 1996’), in the version applicable in the case in the main proceedings, states:
1120, v nadaljevanju: TKG 1996) v različici, ki jo je treba uporabiti v postopku v glavni stvari, določa:
Rates shall be based on the costs of efficient service provision and shall accommodate the requirements under Paragraph 24(2) below. …
Cene morajo biti naravnane na stro�ke učinkovitega opravljanja storitev in v skladu z zahtevami odstavka 2. […]
Rates must not:
Cene ne smejo
(1) contain surcharges which can be imposed solely as a result of the provider’s dominant position, within the meaning of Paragraph 19 of the Law against restraints of competition, in the relevant telecommunications market;
1. vsebovati dodatkov, ki se lahko naložijo samo zaradi prevladujočega položaja ponudnika na zadevnem telekomunikacijskem trgu na podlagi člena 19 zakona proti omejevanju konkurence;
(2) contain discounts which prejudice the competitive opportunities of other undertakings on the telecommunications market or
2. vsebovati znižanj, ki omejujejo konkurenčne možnosti drugih podjetij na telekomunikacijskem trgu, ali
(3) confer advantages on certain operators compared with other operators using equivalent or similar telecommunications services on the telecommunications market in question, unless there is evidence of an objectively justifiable reason therefor.’
3. dajati enim obratovalcem prednost pred drugimi obratovalci, ki na zadevnem telekomunikacijskem trgu ponujajo enakovredne ali podobne telekomunikacijske storitve, razen če je v zvezi s tem izkazan objektiven razlog.“
Paragraph 27(1) of the TKG 1996 provides that the NRA is to approve rates either on the basis of the cost of providing an efficient service for each type of service or on the basis of the average price, set by that authority, for a basket of services.
Člen 27(1) TKG 1996 določa, da NRO odobri cene na podlagi stro�kov učinkovitega opravljanja storitev za vsako storitev ali na podlagi ravni povprečnih stopenj gibanja cen, ki jo določi in se plača za kategorijo storitev.
Paragraph 27(4) empowers the Federal Government to issue regulations setting out the rules applying to different types of approvals and defining the terms and conditions under which the NRA is required to decide which of the procedures listed in Paragraph 27(1) is to apply.
Odstavek 4 tega člena zvezno vlado poobla�ča, da z uredbami opredeli pravila za vrste dovoljenj in določi pogoje, v skladu s katerimi mora NRO odločiti, kateri od postopkov iz odstavka 1 navedenega člena se uporablja.
Telecommunications Rates Regulation
Uredba o uravnavanju cen na področju telekomunikacij
‘Paragraph 2
„Člen 2
The company which filed the application referred to in Paragraph 27(1) of the TKG [1996] must produce the following documents relating to the service in question in each case:
Podjetje, ki je vložilo zahtevek za odobritev cen iz člena 27(1) TKG [1996], mora v vsakem primeru predložiti naslednje dokumente v zvezi z zadevno storitvijo:
(1) a detailed description of the service, including information on the quality of the service and a copy of the terms and conditions applying to it,
1. podroben opis storitve, vključno s podatki o njeni kakovosti in z osnutkom splo�nih pogojev,
(2) turnover figures for the last five years and also forecast turnover for the year of filing and for the next four years,
2. podatke o prometu, ustvarjenem v zadnjih petih letih, ter o predvidenem prometu za leto vložitve zahtevka in �tiri naslednja leta,
(3) information on sales volumes and, if possible, on price elasticity of demand for the period referred to in point (2),
3. podatke o obsegu prodaje, in če je mogoče, o cenovni elastičnosti povpra�evanja za obdobje iz točke 2,
(4) figures for the trend in the various costs referred to in Paragraph 2 (cost statements) and the trend in variable cost margins for the period referred to in point (2);
4. podatke o razvoju različnih stro�kov iz odstavka 2 (dokazila o stro�kih) in razvoju spremenljivih stro�kov za obdobje iz točke 2,
(5) information on the financial impact on customers, as regards in particular the structure of demand from private and business customers, and on competitors who receive the service as a preliminary service, and
5. podatke o finančnem vplivu na uporabnike, zlasti glede strukture povpra�evanja zasebnih in poslovnih uporabnikov, ter na konkurente, ki prejemajo storitev kot predhodno storitev, in
(6) in the case of differential rates, information on the effects on the user groups affected by the differential rates, as well as objective justification for the proposed differential rates.
6. pri diferenciaciji cen podatke o učinkih na skupine uporabnikov, ki jih zadeva diferenciacija, in objektivno utemeljitev načrtovane diferenciacije.
Cost statements according to the fourth point of subparagraph 1 above shall comprise costs that can be directly allocated to the given service (direct costs) and costs that cannot be directly allocated to the given service (common costs).
Dokazila o stro�kih iz odstavka 1, točka 4, obsegajo stro�ke, ki se lahko neposredno pripi�ejo storitvi (neposredni stro�ki), in stro�ke, ki se ji ne morejo pripisati neposredno (posredni stro�ki).
In such allocation, the filing company shall take account of the criteria of the Council directives adopted under Article 6 of Council Directive 90/387/EEC of 28 June 1990 on the establishment of the internal market for telecommunications services through the implementation of open network provision … Also to be included in the cost statements according to sentence 1 above is an account of:
Podjetje, ki je vložilo zahtevek, mora za ta pripis upo�tevati merila, določena z direktivami Sveta, sprejetimi na podlagi člena 6 Direktive Sveta 90/387/EGS z dne 28. junija 1990 o vzpostavitvi notranjega trga za telekomunikacijske storitve z uvedbo zagotavljanja odprtosti omrežij […]. V dokazilih o stro�kih iz prvega stavka morajo biti natančneje navedeni tudi:
(2) the level of payroll costs, depreciation, cost of capital, costs in relation to materials;
2. znesek stro�kov za zaposlene, amortizacije, finančnih stro�kov vloženega kapitala, materialnih stro�kov,
(3) target and actual capacity utilisation in the reference period; and
3. uporaba predvidene in uresničene zmogljivosti v referenčnem obdobju, in
(4) the quantities used as a basis for calculating the costs of providing the service, including the relevant prices, and in particular the elements of the public telecommunications network and the cost of using those elements.
4. količine, uporabljene kot osnova za izračun uporabljenih stro�kov za storitev, vključno z ustreznimi cenami, predvsem deli javnega telekomunikacijskega omrežja in stro�ki uporabe teh delov.
The [NRA] may reject an application for rates approval where the company fails to produce the documents referred to in Paragraphs 1 and 2 in full.
[NRO] lahko zavrne zahtevek za odobritev cen, če podjetje ne predloži vseh dokumentov iz odstavkov 1 in 2.
Paragraph 3
Člen 3
The [NRA] is to examine the documentation submitted by the filing company with a view to establishing whether and to what extent the rates proposed are based on the cost of efficient service provision within the meaning of subparagraph 2 below.
[NRO] mora preučiti dokazila, ki jih predloži podjetje, ki je vložilo zahtevek, da bi ugotovil, ali in koliko so zahtevane cene naravnane na stro�ke učinkovitega opravljanja storitev v smislu odstavka 2.
The costs of efficient service provision are derived from the longterm additional costs of providing the service plus an appropriate amount for volume-neutral common costs, both inclusive of an appropriate return on capital employed, to the extent that these costs are required to provide the offering.
Stro�ki učinkovitega opravljanja storitev izhajajo iz dolgoročnih dodatnih stro�kov storitve in primernega dodatka iz naslova skupnih stro�kov, neodvisnih od obsega storitve, kar vedno vključuje tudi primeren donos od vloženega kapitala, če so ti stro�ki nujni za to storitev.
In the context of the examination provided for in subparagraph 1 above, the [NRA] shall, for the purposes of comparison, refer additionally to, in particular, the prices and costs of companies offering corresponding services on comparable markets in a competitive situation.
[NRO] bo moral pri preučevanju iz odstavka 1 poleg tega za primerjavo uporabiti cene in stro�ke podjetij, ki v konkurenčnem položaju ponujajo enake storitve na podobnih trgih.
Where cost statements under Paragraph 2(2) exceed the cost of efficient service under that provision, they are to be deemed expenditure surplus to efficient provision.
Če stro�ki, utemeljeni na podlagi člena 2(2), presegajo stro�ke učinkovitega opravljanja storitev v skladu z odstavkom 2, se �tejejo kot izdatki, ki niso potrebni za učinkovito opravljanje storitev.
That expenditure and other neutral expenditure shall only be taken into account in the rates approval procedure if, and for such duration as, there is a legal requirement to that effect or the filing company provides other objective justification therefor.’
Ti izdatki in drugi nevtralni izdatki se v postopku odobritve cen upo�tevajo le, če – in dokler – obstaja zakonska obveznost v tem smislu ali če podjetje, ki je vložilo zahtevek, ponudi drugo objektivno utemeljitev.“
The case in the main proceedings and the questions referred
Spor o glavni stvari in vprašanja za predhodno odločanje