natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When the budget line was renewed for a third time in 1999, with a modest increase in project funding to a maximum of EUR 125 000, it was with a view to continuing action while a legal base was iden-ti«edandprocesseswerecompletedforamultiannualprogrammetobelaunchedin2000.
Ko so proraｲun leta 1999 ob-novili þe tretjiｲ, s skromnim poveｲanjem «nanciranjaprojektovdonajveｲ125000evrov,jebilo to storjeno z namenom, da se nadaljuje z dejavnostmi, medtem ko je bila doloｲena za-konska podlaga in so bili zakljuｲeni postopki za veｲletni program, ki naj bi se zaｲel leta 2000.
She subsequently became Technical Expert to the Daphne initiative and Daphne programme 2000«03.) `European cooperation with NGOs active in the # g h t a g a i n s t t r a L c k i n g a n d s e x u a l e x p l o i t a t i o n of children: Conclusions of hearing of 11 April 1997' (Doc.
Kasneje je postala strokovnjakinja za pobudo Daphne in program Daphne 2000«2003.Evropsko sodelovanje z NVO, ki so dejavni v boju proti trgovini z otroki in spolnemu izkoriù┘anju otrok: Zaklju┘ki z obravnave z dne 11. aprila 1997 (Doc. R013VDAT).
Two other issues were discussed at the meeting: the advantages and risks associated with growing use of the Internet, and missing children databases. 葵eformerwas not prioritised because of parallel Commission initiatives speci#callyinthisarea.葵elatterwasconsidered to need further in-depth analysis and discussion before action could be taken.) 葵erehaveo挨enbeenquestions about the name of the initiative and attempts to decipher it as an acronym.
Na obravnavi se je razpravljalo ùe o dveh vpraùanjih: o prednostih in tveganjih, povezanih z naraù┘ajo┘o uporabo interneta ter zbirkah podatkov o pogreùanih otrocih. Prvo vpraùanje ni bilo prednostno, saj ima Komisija vzporedne pobude posebej na tem podro┘ju.
In fact, in the tradition of many Commission programmes that have names sourced from the classics, Daphne makes reference to the young woman of Greek mythology who was chased by the god Apollo, who wished to ravage her.
Za drugo vpraùanje so ocenili, da ga je treba dodatno podrobneje analizirati in obravnavati, preden se lahko ukrepa.Pogosto so se pojavljala vpraùanja glede imena pobude in nekateri so ga poskuùali razvozlati, kot bi ùlo za kratico.
As Apollo touched her, Daphne was transformed into a laurel tree (Daphne in Greek) and thus her honour was saved. 葵ereference is, of course, to protection from sexual violence.) 葵 e c uijt - o K b e t w e e n ` c h i l d r e n ' and `young people' was not de#ned.In practice, most projects follow the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in de#ningachildasanyone under 18 years of age. `Young people', on the other hand, is
Dejansko pa « tako kot je v navadi pri mnogih programih Komisije, katerih imena izvirajo iz klasikov, je Daphne ime mladenke iz grùke mitologije, ki jo je
The Daphne programme 2000›03 continued the work of the initiative, with funding of EUR 20 million over four years.
Program Daphne 2000›2003 je s proraｲunom 20 milijonov evrov za obdobje þtirih let nada-ljeval delo pobude.
Learning from the lessons drawn each year from the Daphne initia-tive, the programme was extended to EFTA/EEA and central and east European countries, Cyprus, Malta and Turkey; local authorities were able to submit proposals; and associate part-
Na podlagi izkuþenj, pridobljenih v okviru pobude Daphne v preteklih
A brief history of Daphne ners were permitted from the candidate countries (because the funding of project activity in these countries was not yet possible).
A brief history of Daphne letih, se je program razþiril na dr™ave EFTA/EGP, dr™ave srednje in vzhodne Evrope ter na Ciper, Malto in Turｲijo; lokalne oblasti so lahko vlo™ile prijave za projekte; in dovoljeno je bilo vklju-ｲevanje pridru™enih partnerjev iz dr™av kandidatk (ker «nanciranjeprojektnihdejavnostivtehdr™avah þe ni bilo mo™no).
Under the Daphne programme, additionally, funding was available for projects of one, two or three years' duration.
Program Daphne je «nanciralprojekte,kisotrajali12mesecev,dveali tri leta.
Submissions received and projects funded, 1997›2003
Prejete prijave in «nanciraniprojekti,1997›2003
Submissions received4282703544152752662582 266
Prejete prijave4282703544152752662582 266
Projects funded4649544735 (*)3933303
Financirani projekti4649544735 (*)3933303
(*) Note that, since the Daphne programme 2000›03 also funded multiannual projects from 2000, some projects continued in subsequent years and thus reduced the budget available for new projects.
(*) Program Daphne 2000›2003 je «nanciraltudiveｲletne projekte iz leta 2000; nekateri od teh so se nadaljevali v naslednjih letih in tako prejemali sredstva iz proraｲuna, namenjena novim projektom.
This explains why fewer projects «gureintheannualselectionroundfrom2001onwards.
Zato je þtevilo projektov v okviru letnega izbora od leta 2001 dalje manjþe.
In February 2003, the European Commission adopted a proposal establishing a second phase of the Daphne programme for the period 2004›08.
Evropska Komisija je februarja 2003 sprejela predlog o vzpostavitvi druge faze programa Daphne za obdobje od leta 2004 do 2008.
A decision on Daphne II was approved by the Council on 30 March 2004.
Svet je 30. marca 2004 sprejel odloｲbo o programu Daphne II.
The new programme was launched in May 2004.
Novi program je za™ivel maja 2004.
The Commis-sion has not substantially changed the objectives, the mechanisms or the targets of the Daphne programme, but it has proposed a number of improvements with a view to enhanc-ing the impact of the programme.
Komisija ni bistveno spremenila njegovih ciljev, mehanizmov ali ciljnih prizadevanj programa Daphne, temveｲ je predlagala veｲ izboljþav, s katerimi ™eli okrepiti vpliv programa: a) Pomembna izboljþava je veｲji proraｲun: v primerjavi s prvim programom, ki je imel na voljo 20 milijonov evrov, bo za obdobje 2004›2008 na voljo 50 milijonov evrov.
(a) An important improvement is the increase of the budget: EUR 50 million will be available for the period 2004›08, compared with EUR 20 million of the «rstprogramme.Anincreasein the budget is necessary in order to face both the consequences of enlargement to cen-tral and east European countries and the large demand from organisations in order to at least reduce frustration that sometimes appears among the applicants.
Veｲji proraｲun je nujno potreben zaradi posledic þiritve v dr™ave srednje in vzhodne Evrope in povpraþevanja organizacij; z njim naj bi vsaj nekoliko zmanjþali slabo voljo, do katere vｲasih prihaja med prosilci.
Daphne II is pro-posed for a period of « v e y e a r s . T h i s p r o v i d e s a n a n n u a l bu d g e t o f E U R 1 0 m i l l i o n i n s t e a d o f EUR 5 million.
Program Daphne II je predlagan za obdobje petih let.
(b) The second improvement is the list of activities that can be supported.
b) Druga izboljþava je seznam dejavnosti, ki jih je mogoｲe podpirati.
The Daphne II pro-gramme is more exhaustive, compared with Daphne I, about the types of activity, the ar-eas of action, which can be funded. It is foreseen that the programme comprise the fol-lowing types of activities:
Program Daphne II je v primerjavi z Daphne I izｲrpnejþi glede na vrste dejavnosti in podroｲja delovanja, ki jih je mogoｲe «nancirati.Predvidenoje,najprogramtvorijonaslednjevrstedejavnosti:
‡ identi«cationandexchangesofgoodpracticeandworkexperiencewithaviewinparticular to implementing preventive measures and assistance to victims;
‡ prepoznavanje in izmenjava dobre prakse ter delovnih izkuþenj, zlasti pri uvajanju pre-ventivnih ukrepov in pomoｲi ™rtvam;
‡ mapping surveys, studies and research;
‡ naｲrtovanje pregledov, þtudij in raziskav;
«eldworkwiththeinvolvementofthebene«ciaries,particularlychildrenandyouth,in all phases of project design, implementation and evaluation;
‡ terensko delo s sodelovanjem prejemnikov pomoｲi, zlasti otrok in mladostnikov, v vseh fazah naｲrtovanja projektov, njihovega izvajanja in vrednotenja;
‡ creation of sustainable multidisciplinary networks; more broadly de#nedtore$ectprevailingnational attitudes and legislation, and generally ranges from around 16 to 25 years of age.
Po drugi strani pa je izraz ‡mladiƒ nekoliko sploùnejùi in o d r a Š a prevladujo┘e d r Š a v n e pristope in zakonodajo ter ponavadi zajema ljudi, stare od 16 do 25 let. Seveda se ta de#nicijaprekrivatudis pojmom ‡odraslostiƒ, kakor se obi┘ajno ozna┘uje.
‡ training and design of educational packages;
‡ usposabljanje in naｲrtovanje izobra™evalnih paketov;
‡ development and implementation of treatment programmes and support for victims and people at risk, including children and young people who witness domestic violence;
‡ razvijanje in izvajanje programov zdravljenja in podpore ™rtvam in ogro™enim skupinam na eni strani ter storilcem, vkljuｲno z otroki in mladimi, ki so oｲividci nasilja v dru™ini, na drugi;
‡ development and implementation of treatment programmes for perpetrators, whilst ensuring the safety of victims and children;
‡ razvijanje in izvajanje programov zdravljenja in podpore za storilce, ob zagotavljanju varnosti ™rtev in otrok;
‡ development and implementation of awareness-raising activities targeted to speci«caudi-ences, design of materials to supplement those already available, or adaptation and use of existing materials in other geographical areas or for other target groups;
‡ razvijanje in izvajanje dejavnosti za krepitev ozaveþｲenosti, namenjenih posebnim jav-nostim, naｲrtovanje pomo™nih gradiv za ™e obstojeｲa gradiva ali prilagajanje in uporaba obstojeｲih gradiv na drugih zemljepisnih obmoｲjih in za druge ciljne skupine;
‡ dissemination of the results obtained under the Daphne I and II programmes including their adaptation, transfer and use by other bene«ciariesorinothergeographicalareas;
‡ razþirjanje dose™kov, uresniｲenih v okviru programov Daphne I in II, njihovo prilagajanje in prenaþanje drugim uporabnikom ali na druga zemljepisna obmoｲja;
‡ assessment and development of activities contributing to positive treatment for people vulnerable to violence, that is to an approach which encourages respect for them and pro-motes their well-being and self-ful«lment.
‡ ocenjevanje in razvijanje dejavnosti, ki prispevajo k pozitivni obravnavi oseb, ki jim gro-zi nasilje, torej pristop, ki spodbuja spoþtovanje do njih in deluje v prid njihovega do-brega poｲutja in lastnega razvoja.
(c) The Commission has also set aside around 15 % of the budget of the programme in order to enable the Commission to improve the programme's impact and to play a more proac-tive rule with a view to the dissemination of good practices.
c) Komisija je obenem doloｲila pribli™no 15 % proraｲuna programa, da bi omogoｲila izboljþanje vplivov programa in imela dejavnejþo vlogo pri razþirjanju dobre prakse.
Activities to be covered are threefold.
Dejavnosti, ki bodo zajete v program, se delijo po treh oseh.
A «rstaxisistodevelopindicatorsonviolence,sothatthequanti«edimpactofpolicies and projects can be measured.
Prva je razvijanje kazalcev o nasilju, da bo mogoｲe vpliv politik in projektov meriti tudi koliｲinsko.
In complement to these indicators, it will seek to set up a procedure for regular and sustainable data collection, preferably with the assist-ance of Eurostat, in order to be able to quantify violence in the Union more accurately.
Za dopolnjevanje teh kazalcev si bo priza-devala vzpostaviti postopek rednega in trajnega zbiranja podatkov, po mo™nosti ob pomoｲi EUROSTAT-a, kar naj bi omogoｲilo natanｲnejþe ugotavljanje obsega nasilja v EU.
A second axis will be to extract and deduce policy issues, wherever possible, from the work achieved by funded projects, with the aim of suggesting common policies on violence at Community level and reinforcing judicial practice.
Druga os bo oblikovanje in ugotavljanje vpraþanj o politikah, kjer koli je to mogoｲe, na podlagi dela, opravljenega v «nanciranihprojektih,zatodabomogoｲepredlagatiskupnepolitikegledenasilja na ravni Skupnosti in okrepiti pravosodno prakso.
Finally, the third axis would be to dis-seminate, on a Europe-wide scale, good practices stemming from funded projects.
Tretja os naj bi bila þirjenje dobre prakse, ki izhaja iz « n a n c i r a n i h p r oj e k t o v , p o v s e j E v r o p i .
In the « r s tffy e a r o f t h e D a p h n e i n i t i a t i v e ( 1 9 9 7 ) , t h e c a l l f o r p r o po s a l s w a s f a i r l y s p e c i « cffo n priority actions to be taken:
Razpis za zbiranje prijav je bil v prvem letu pobude Daphne (1997) dokaj natanｲen glede pred-nostnih dejavnosti, ki naj bi se izvajale:
‡ setting up networks or reinforcement of networks at European level to promote and coor-dinate information and actions on measures aimed at protecting, and preventing violence towards children, young people and women, including the promotion of cooperation be-tween NGOs and voluntary organisations and authorities involved in these areas;
‡ vzpostavljanje ali krepitev stikov na evropski ravni, zato da se spodbuja in usklajuje þirjenje informacij in dejavnosti glede ukrepov, ki so namenjeni zaþｲiti in prepreｲevanju nasilja nad otroki, mladimi in ™enskami; vkljuｲno s spodbujanjem sodelovanja med NVO, prostovolj-nimi organizacijami in organi, vpletenimi v ta podroｲja;
‡ promotion of the establishment of a `child helpline' on a similar basis in every Member State;
‡ vzpostavljanje ¶telefonov za pomoｲ otrokom v stiskiƒ na podoben naｲin v vseh dr™avah ｲlanicah;
‡ special measures at European level for the protection of children, young people and wom-en, with primary consideration being given to them in all actions concerning them, their rights being enjoyed without discrimination of any kind;
‡ posebni ukrepi na evropski ravni za zaþｲito otrok, mladih in ™ensk, pri ｲemer bo njim na-menjena glavnina pozornosti v vseh dejavnostih, ki jih zadevajo; obenem pa bodo u™ivali pravice brez kakrþne koli diskriminacije;
‡ prevention and protection of children, young people and women from all kinds of violence and commercial sexual exploitation, tra/ckingandotherabuse;
‡ prepreｲevanje vseh vrst nasilja, spolnega izkoriþｲanja v komercialne namene, trgovine in drugih zlorab in zaþｲita otrok, mladih in ™ensk;
‡ actions aimed at tackling international paedophile rings;
‡ dejavnosti, namenjene razkrivanju mednarodnih pedo«lskihmre™;
‡ pilot projects and subsidies to NGOs or voluntary organisations working towards these aims, in particular working for the rights and the protection of children, young people and women, in particular regarding sexual abuse.
‡ pilotni projekti in subvencije za NVO ali prostovoljne organizacije, ki stremijo k tem ciljem, posebej za tiste, ki se borijo za pravice in zaþｲito otrok, mladih in ™ensk, zlasti v zvezi z spol-nim zlorabljanjem.
The 1997 priorities clearly re‹ectedthepoliticalimpetusbehindtheinitiativeinthewakeofthe `Dutroux a . a i r ' i n B e l g i u m a n d t h e W o r l d Cffo n g r e s s a g a i n s t Cffo m mffe r c i a l S e x u a l E x p l o i t a - t i o n of Children.
Prednostne naloge iz leta 1997 so jasno odra™ale politiｲni zagon, ki se je skrival za pobudo, ob izbruhu ¶afere Dutrouxƒ v Belgiji in na svetovnem kongresu proti spolnemu izkoriþｲanju otrok v komercialne namene.
Sexual violence is mentioned in three of the six stated measures and the call for actions `aimed at tackling international paedophile rings' is a clear if unrealistic echo of public and political concerns of the time.
Spolno nasilje je omenjeno v treh od þestih navedenih ukrepov in poziv k ¶razkrivanju mednarodnih pedo«lskihmre™ƒjejasen,ｲepravnerealenodsevpoli-tiｲnih bojazni in strahu javnosti v tistem ｲasu.
In fact, it was unlikely that NGOs would consider themselves as the appropriate instigators of actions targeting international paedophile rings and indeed it is unlikely that the selection panel formed to review the submissions would have looked favourably on any project that demonstrated ignorance of the limits of NGO actions in what is clearly primarily a police investigation and law-enforcement task.
Dejansko je bilo te™ko verjeti, da bi NVO sebe obravnavali kot primerne pobudnike za ukrepanje pri razkrivanju mednarodnih pedo«lskihmre™. Þe manj je verjetno, da bi izbirna komisija, ki naj bi pregledovala prijave, pozitivno ob-ravnavala kakrþen koli projekt, ki ne bi upoþteval omejitev NVO pri ukrepanju v zadevah, ki so oｲitno domena policije in organov pregona.
In practice, however, a number of exploratory e . o r t s bo t h i n D a p h n e - f u n d e d projects, and through a working conference supported by EU-wide research and con-vened by the Commission itself in 1998, showed that varied and deeply established technical, u s e r - p r o « l e a n d l o g i s t i c a l i s s u e s i n t h e Mffe m b e r S t a t e s m a d e a s i n g l e Cffo m mstu n i tffy - w i d e h e l - p l i n e service impossible to achieve (at least given realities then current in telephone technol-ogy, structures and use).
Po þtevilnih predhodnih raziskovanjih tako v okviru projektov, « n a n c i r a n i h s p r o g r a m o m D a p h n e , kot tudi na delovni konferenci, ki jo je leta 1998 na osnovi raziskav, ki so potekale þirom EU, sklicala sama Komisija, se je dejansko izkazalo, da je spriｲo raznolikih in globoko zakoreninjenih tehniｲnih, uporabniþkih in logistiｲnih problemov v dr™avah ｲlanicah nemogo-ｲe vzpostaviti enotno tovrstno telefonsko storitev po vsej Skupnosti (vsaj ne zaradi razmer v takratni telefonski tehnologiji, strukturah in uporabi).
The selection criteria for projects were much more grounded in reality, deriving from a judi-cious coming-together of the modalities outlined in the Stockholm Declaration and Agenda for Action and the Commission's encouragement of European added value.
Merila za izbor projektov so v praksi v veliko veｲji meri upoþtevala dejanske razmere. Nastala so ob smiselnem usklajevanju naｲinov delovanja iz Stockholmske deklaracije in akcijskega programa ter spodbujanjem evropske dodane vrednosti s strani Komisije.
Proposals were to meet the following criteria:
Prijave so morale izpolnjevati naslednja merila:
‡ ability to present added value at European Union level ̌ projects focusing not only on the immediate (local, regional or national) situation but seeking to contribute to development at a European level;
‡ sposobnost, da prinesejo dodano vrednost na ravni Evropske unije › projekti, ki se ne osre-dotoｲajo zgolj na trenutne (lokalne, regionalne, dr™avne) razmere, temveｲ skuþajo prispe-vati k razvoju na evropski ravni;
‡ aims to promote best practice in the area(s) concerned;
‡ spodbujanje najboljþe prakse na zadevnem podroｲju;
‡ ability to permit transnational exchanges;
‡ omogoｲanje mednarodnih izmenjav;
‡ a target of transferable results, containing result indicators related to the objectives, with detailed provisions for monitoring against these indicators.
‡ prenosljivi rezultati; vkljuｲno s kazalci rezultatov, povezanimi s cilji, in vsa podrobna do-loｲila za spremljanje ob upoþtevanju teh kazalcev.
The Commission believed that the thematic and programmatic aims outlined in the call for proposals were most likely to be achieved through projects that included the following ac-tivities:
Komisija je menila, da bi se tematski in programski cilji, podani v pozivu za zbiranje prijav, naj-la™je dosegli s projekti, ki so vkljuｲevali naslednje dejavnosti:
‡ training and exchanges, primarily for personnel of NGOs and private associations;
‡ usposabljanje in izmenjave, v prvi vrsti za osebje NVO in zasebna zdru™enja;
‡ pilot projects demonstrating clear European interest and value added;
‡ pilotni projekti, ki bi jasno odra™ali evropski interes in dodano vrednost;
‡ the setting-up or reinforcement of European networks, particularly for the promotion and coordination of information and focused on protection and prevention;
‡ vzpostavljanje in krepitev stikov po Evropi › predvsem za spodbujanje in þirjenje informa-cij, ki so usmerjene v zaþｲito in prepreｲevanje;
‡ studies and research;
‡ þtudije in raziskovanje;
‡ dissemination of information including through campaigns, brochures, newsletters, media presentations, etc. to raise awareness of the problems and to encourage non-violence;
‡ þirjenje informacij z akcijami, broþurami, okro™nicami, medijskimi predstavitvami itd., za ozaveþｲanje o problemih in spodbujanje nenasilja;
‡ promotion of cooperation between NGOs and public authorities, including law-enforce-ment and judicial bodies.
‡ spodbujanje sodelovanja med NVO in javnimi organi, vkljuｲno z organi pregona in sodnimi organi.
Although these criteria, aims and priorities presented a formidable challenge to the planning capacity of NGOs, many of whom had worked broadly in child protection but not speci«callyon violence and rarely at pan-European level, the 47 projects selected in 1997 were well fo-cused and succeeded in `tuning in' to the Commission's multi-faceted guidelines.
Peprav so ta merila, cilji in prednostne naloge bili enkraten izziv za naｲrtovalne sposobnosti NVO, katerih velik del je bil dejaven na podroｲju zaþｲite otrok, vendar ne posebej na podroｲju nasilja in le redko na vseevropski ravni, se je vseh 47 projektov, ki so bili izbrani leta 1997, jas-no opredelilo in uspeþno uskladilo z raznolikimi smernicami Komisije.
Since the Daphne initiative and programme comprise projects submitted rather than projects commissioned, the eventual focus of the projects depends entirely on what the proposing organisations wish to work on (within the general guidelines provided).
Ker pobuda Daphne (in program Daphne) zajema predlo™ene projekte in ne naroｲenih, je konｲna usmeritev projektov odvisna izkljuｲno od tega, s ｲim se ™elijo ukvarjati organizacije predlagateljice projektov (v okviru doloｲenih sploþnih smernic).
Consequently, by the second call for proposals in March 1998, there were already `gaps' in the range of project ac-tivity being undertaken, so the 1998 call listed these areas and stated that priority would be given to «llingthem.
Zaradi tega so se ob drugem pozivu za zbiranje prijav marca 1998 ™e pojavile ¶vrzeliƒ v izboru projektnih dejavnosti, za katere so se odloｲale organizacije. Tako je poziv iz leta 1998 zajemal ravno podroｲja iz ¶vrzeliƒ in obenem navajal, da bodo imeli prednost projekti, ki bodo pokrivali ta podroｲja.
The lessons of 1997 had been well learned and the call for proposals to set up an EU-wide helpline was not repeated in the general call (9). Instead, the general measures included:
Izkuþnje iz leta 1997 so bile zelo pouｲne in tako poziv za zbiranje prijav za vzpostavitev vse- evropskega telefona za pomoｲ ni bil veｲ vkljuｲen v sploþnem pozivu.9 Namesto tega so sploþ- ni ukrepi zajemali:
) In fact, a separate call for a project in which this issue could be researched thoroughly was issued in 1999 and preceded by a meeting of all European helpline operators, and some from the candidate countries, jointly hosted by the Commission and Unicef. 葵emeetingcon#rmedthedivergence of opinions and structures, and the subsequent round of project submissions proved to be inadequate, focusing more on extending current national experience rather than fully exploring the divergences and potential noted in the conference.
Pravzaprav je leta 1999 izùel poseben poziv za projekt, v katerem bi se to vpraùanje lahko podrobno raziskalo.
No projects were recommended as a result and the issue disappeared altogether from the Daphne radar screen.
Pred tem pa so se na pobudo Komisije in UNICEF-a sestali vsi operaterji evropskih telefonov za pomo┘ in nekateri iz d r Š a v kandidatk.
‡ promoting the introduction of instruments designed to encourage the reporting of vio-lence against children, young people and women, and forms of tra/ckinginwomenforthe purpose of sexual exploitation in accordance with arrangements which are similar in all Member States.
‡ uvedbo pripomoｲkov, ki bi spodbujali prijavljanje primerov nasilja nad otroki, mladimi in ™enskami ter trgovine z ™enskami z namenom spolnega izkoriþｲanja, v skladu z ureditvijo, ki je podobna v vseh dr™avah ｲlanicah.
A brief history of Daphne
Cilji in prednostne naloge
This left the possibilities open for broader exploration of reporting mechanisms beyond telephone helplines (for example drop-in centres, police help-desks, etc.).
To je omogoｲilo preuｲevanje drugih mehanizmov poroｲanja poleg telefonov za pomoｲ (na primer sprejemnih centrov, policijskega telefona za klic v sili itd.)