natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Similarly, the project hopes to bridge the gap between locals and newcomers, and develop contact between cross-border communities.Following an introductory and promotional phase in July and August 2005, the project began on 15 September 2005.
Podobno skuša premostiti tudi razkorak med domačini in priseljenci ter razviti stik med čezmejnimi skupnostmi.Projekt se je začel 15. septembra 2005 po uvodni in promocijski fazi julija in avgusta 2005.
The mobile play and games unit will operate during the school year as well as during the holidays.
Potujoča igralnica bo delovala med šolskim letom, pa tudi med počitnicami.
Games, climbing structures, arts and crafts, and circus equipment will be organised and supervised by two graduate teachers from Luxembourg and Belgium.
Igre, plezala, umetnost in obrti ter cirkuško opremo bosta organizirala in nadzorovala dva diplomirana učitelja iz Luksemburga in Belgije.
The Leader+ phase runs exclusively in the Redange–Wiltz and Cuestas regions until September 2007.
Faza Leader+ bo potekala izključno v regijah Redange-Wiltz in Cuestas do septembra 2007.
One of the attractions of Austrian nature parks is the fact that farm products continue to be made in the same traditional way as they have always been.
področja.Trenutno 13 takih parkov iz 13 različnih regij Leader+ in petih provinc sodeluje z„Združenjem avstrijskih naravnih parkov“ pri medozemeljskem projektu Leader+, ki temelji na njihovi kulinarični privlačnosti.
At the same time, these regional specialities have become increasingly a central element of an area’s attraction.Now, 13 such parks in 13 different Leader+ regions, and in ve provinces, are currently working together with the Association of Austrian Nature Parks on an interterritorial Leader+ project based on their culinary appeal.The overall objective is to help farmers sell their products at a better price in order that they may keep to their traditional ways of production.
Skupni cilj je pomagati kmetom pri prodaji njihovih proizvodov po boljših cenah, tako da bi lahko ohranili svoje tradicionalne načine proizvodnje. S tem bi se zavarovali tudi pomembni deli kulturne krajine, na primer hribovski pašniki, sadovnjaki, travniki in tradicionalni vinogradi.
In turn, this protects important parts of the cultural landscape, such as mountain pastures, orchards, meadows and traditional vineyards.
Poleg tega bi lahko naravni parki s kulinaričnimi specialitetami in sentimentalnostjo, ki jih obdaja, spodbudili več zanimanja javnosti.
Furthermore, nature parks can generate more publicity through culinary specialities and the sentimentality which surrounds them.Some nature parks already sell farm products in their shops, providing additional income for farmers.
Nekateri naravni parki že prodajajo kmetijske proizvode v lastnih prodajalnah, kar zagotavlja dodaten dohodek za kmete.
The Association of Austrian Nature Parks has also created special Christmas gift packs using these specialities.These seasonal packs are marketed in newspapers, mailings and on the association’s website.
Združenje avstrijskih narodnih parkov je iz teh specialitet pripravilo tudi božične darilne pakete.Ti sezonski paketi se tržijo v časopisih, preko pošte in na spletni strani združenja.
A partner rm then parcels up and sends the gift packs by mail to the customer.The ‘Austrian nature park culinary specialities’ project supports the nature parks by organising an exchange of experience between the parks, establishing common criteria for a nature park specialities’ origin and quality label, undertaking marketing for ‘nature park specialities’ such as the developing of a corporate design, establishing an Internet shop, attending fairs and carrying out events in Austrian towns, etc.
Partnersko podjetje potem pripravi pošiljko in po pošti odpošlje darilne pakete stranki. Projekt „Kulinarične specialitete avstrijskih narodnih parkov“ podpira naravne parke tako, da organizira izmenjavo izkušenj med parki, vzpostavlja skupna merila za označbe porekla in kakovosti za „specialitete narodnih parkov“ in izvaja trženje za te proizvode, na primer z razvojem celostne podobe, postavitvijo internetne trgovine, udeležbo na sejmih in prirejanjem dogodkov v avstrijskih mestih itd.
Contact person: Marelli Asamer-Handler E-mail: asamer.handler@naturparke.at Website: www.naturparke.at Photo provided by the Austrian National Network Unit
Ime kontaktne osebe: Marelli Asamer-Handler E-pošta: asamer.handler@naturparke.at Spletna stran: www.naturparke.at F o to g ra ja : Avstrijska nacionalna omrežna enota
Process MagentaProcess Yellow
Izkoriščanje regijske dediščine
Where tolerance is nurtured with nature
Kjer se strpnost neguje z naravo
Member State: Germany Region, district: Lower Saxony Name of the LAG: Isenhagener Land
Država članica: Nemčija Regija, okrožje: Spodnja Saška Ime LAS: Isenhagener Land
Member State: Italy Region, district: Tuscany, Maremma Name of the LAG: FAR Maremma
Država članica: Italija Regija, okrožje: Toskana, Maremma Ime LAS: FAR Maremma
Project total cost: EUR 194 281EU: EUR 75 000Other public funding: EUR 119 281Period of project eligibility: 21 February 2001 to 31 July 2005
Skupni stroški projekta: 194 281 EUREU: 75 000 EURDruga javna sredstva: 119 281 EURObdobje upravičenosti projekta: 21. februar 2001–31. julij 2005
Project total cost: EUR 221 000EU: EUR 59 670Other public funding: EUR 139 230Private funding: EUR 22 100Period of project eligibility: 1 July 2002 to 28 February 2005
Skupni stroški projekta: 221 000 EUREU: 59 670 EURDruga javna sredstva: 139 230 EURZasebna sredstva: 22 100 EURObdobje upravičenosti projekta: 1. julij 2002–28. februar 2005
Young immigrants (Spätaussiedler) from Russia make up to 10 % of the Isenhagener Land region’s population, and due to language barriers, communication with them is dificult.
Mladi emigranti (Spätaussiedler) iz Rusije predstavljajo do deset odstotkov prebivalstva regije Isenhagener Land, sporazumevanje z njimi pa je zaradi jezikovnih ovir težko.
Consequently, these immigrants have become isolated from the rest of the community, which has resulted in social conflict.
Posledično so postali ti emigranti izolirani od preostale skupnosti, zaradi česar je prišlo do socialnega konikta.
To overcome this, the LAG is trying to establish common activities to bring the local young people into contact with their immigrant counterparts.One of the project‘s goals is to achieve mutual tolerance and an understanding of nature and the environment.
LAS skuša za rešitev tega problema vzpostaviti skupne dejavnosti, ki bi omogočile stik med domačo mladino in priseljenimi vrstniki.Eden od projektnih ciljev je doseči obojestransko strpnost, razumevanje narave in okolja.
The importance of this became evident in a pilot nature-pro-tection project, where the group’s ability to relate to crafts was more important than their language skills.
Pomembnost tega se je pokazala v pilotnem projektu o varstvu narave, pri katerem so bile pomembnejše ročne spretnosti skupine kakor pa njihove jezikovne sposobnosti.
In this pilot project, both youth groups were brought together for excursions or to paint pictures.
V tem pilotnem projektu sta obe skupini mladih sodelovali pri izletih ali risanju slik.
They also worked with new media, such as digital cameras, computers and the Internet, in order to understand more about nature.
Delali so tudi z novimi mediji, na primer z digitalnimi fotoaparati, računalniki in internetom, da bi se bolje spoznali z naravo.
The highlights of the youth work were the adventure camps.
Vrhunec dela mladih so bili počitniški tabori, v katerih so mladi z igrami in drugimi dejavnostmi spoznavali, kako odgovorno ravnati z naravo.
Here, young people spent time learning to act responsibly with nature and with one another through plays and other activities.
Prvi rezultati so pokazali, da so bile začetne težave pri vzpostavljanju stika med mladimi kmalu premagane, ko so začeli sodelovati v projektnih dejavnostih.
The first results showed that initial problems in developing contact with these young people are soon overcome once they participate in the project activities.The agency responsible for the project is the Aktion Fischotterschutz eV, which works in cooperation with the Kolping Migrationswerk.
Agencija, odgovorna za ta projekt, je„Aktion Fischotterschutz e.V.“, ki deluje v sodelovanju s „Kolping Migrationswerk“.
Contact person: Dr Oskar Kölsch E-mail: o.koelsch@otterzentrum.de Website: www.otterzentrum.de
Ime kontaktne osebe: Dr. Oskar Kölsch E-pošta: o.koelsch@otterzentrum.de Spletna stran: www.otterzentrum.de F o to g ra ja : Nemška nacionalna omrežna enota
Since 2000, ‘Enhancing the value of historic, artistic and museum heritage of the territory’ has been the cornerstone of the development strategy of Tuscany.
Od leta 2000 je bilo „Povečevanje vrednosti zgodovinske,umetniške in muzejske dediščine območja“ temelj razvojne strategije Toskane.
Massa Marittima, in the territory of the FAR Maremma LAG, is a small country town with a rich historical and artistic heritage.
Massa Marittima na območju LAS Far Maremma je majhno podeželsko mesto z bogato zgodovinsko in umetnostno dediščino.
It provided the ideal place to implement a herit-age-orientated project which on completion is expected to create 15 new jobs and attract an extra 10 000 tourists annually.The town, whose economy was based on the region’s mineral wealth (especially marble) has now been granted recognition as a city of art by the Province of Grosseto.
Predstavljalo je idealen kraj za izvajanje projekta, usmerjenega v dediščino, za katerega se pričakuje, da bo na koncu ustvaril 15 novih delovnih mest in pritegnil 10 000 dodatnih turistov letno.Mesto z gospodarstvom, ki temelji na regijskem rudninskem bogastvu (zlasti marmorju), je zdaj dobilo od province Grosseto priznan status mesta umetnosti.
Massa Marittima has the region’s largest number and variety of museums.
Massa Marittima ima največje število različnih muzejev v regiji.
It has therefore been selected as a place of major historic and artistic value within the province.The municipality of Massa Marittima has developed a range of cultural attractions by creating an integrated museum system.
Zato je bilo izbrano kot kraj z posebno zgodovinsko in umetnostno vrednostjo v provinci. Mestna občina Massa Marittima je razvila vrsto kulturnih znamenitosti s tem, ko je ustvarila povezan sistem muzejev.
It has established a centre for modern art, which houses more than 750 masterpieces, and has refurbished several sections of its archeological museum.
Ustanovila je center moderne umetnosti, v katerem je več kot 750 umetniških del, in obnovila več oddelkov arheološkega muzeja.
It has also hosted an event of international importance: an exhibition of works by sculptor Igor Mitoraj, which were created for staging one of Puccini’s operas, Manon Lascaut.All this has been possible thanks to the local development plan, which has also supported: the publication of a regional guide; the construction of an Internet website and the realisation of a CD-ROM dedicated to the Massa Marittima museums.
Bila je tudi gostiteljica dogodka mednarodnega pomena, razstave del kiparja Igorja Mitoraja, ki jih je ustvaril za postavitev ene od Puccinijevih oper, Manon Lascaut. Vse to je bilo mogoče izvesti zaradi načrta lokalnega razvoja, ki je podpiral tudi objavo regionalnega vodnika, oblikovanje internetne spletne strani in izdelavo zgoščenke, posvečene muzejem v Massi Marittimi.
Several developments in the tourist sector have also taken place: the production of an archeological and naturalist map of the Accesa Lake, providing tourists with practical information and advice; the creation of a documentation centre within the new Sacred Art Museum; a number of didactical and illustrative panels installed at an ancient olive oil press; the restoration of a public well; and the creation of an Etrurian archeological park.
Doseženih je bilo tudi nekaj izboljšav v turističnem sektorju: izdelava arheološkega in naravnega zemljevida jezera Accesa s praktičnimi informacijami in nasveti za turiste; ustanovitev dokumentacijskega centra v novem muzeju nabožne umetnosti; številne didaktične in ilustrativne table, nameščene ob starinskih stiskalnicah za oljčno olje; obnova javnega vodnjaka in postavitev etruščanskega arheološkega parka.
Providing insight into the practical importance and value of the evaluation of Leader by John Grieve, of e Rural Development Company, Scotland, Evaluator of the Leader II programme England and Wales (ex post), Leader+ programme in Scotland (ex ante and mid-term update) and Leader+ programme in England (mid-term update and mainstreaming evidence base)
Avtor: John Grieve, Družba za razvoj podeželja, Škotska, ocenjevalec programa Leader II v Angliji in Walesu (naknadno), programa Leader+ na Škotskem (predhodna in srednjeročna posodobitev) in programa Leader+ v Angliji (srednjeročna posodobitev in vzdrževanje zbirke podatkov)
John Grieve, The Rural Development Company, Scotland
John Grieve, Družba za razvoj podeželja, Škotska
One of the commonly identified pluses of Leader is its ability to address risk aversion in development agencies, since risk aversion from match funding partners is in some countries one of the initiative’s major constraints.
Ena od splošno ugotovljenih pozitivnih lastnosti programa Leader je njegova zmožnost, da obravnava strah pred tveganjem v razvojnih agencijah, saj je v nekaterih državah strah pred tveganjem glede financiranja s strani partnerjev ena od glavnih ovir za pobudo.
Evaluation evidence is therefore important in justifying the use of resources and the application of public funds, particularly in a challenging or competitive funding environment where resources are nite.
Dokaz o vrednotenju je torej pomemben pri utemeljevanju uporabe virov in uporabe javnih sredstev, zlasti v zahtevnem ali konkurenčnem finančnem okolju, kjer viri niso neizčrpni.
When it comes to mainstreaming, evaluation allows us to demonstrate that ‘we know what works and what doesn’t’ for the different sectors of the rural communities, since it is based on proven experience.
Ko gre za vprašanje upravičene uporabe sredstev, vrednotenje dokazuje, da„vemo, kaj deluje in kaj ne“ v različnih sektorjih podeželskih skupnosti, ker temelji na dokazanih izkušnjah.
In making the wider case for Leader, with its focus on process as well as results, justification rather than assertion is crucial regardless of how attractive we find the process, method or approach.The remainder of this article outlines and explains some of the principles of evaluation and how they relate to the particular challenges of Leader.
Ko želimo Leader, ki je osredotočen tako na postopek kot na rezultate, postaviti na širše temelje, velja, da je utemeljitev bolj bistvena kot pojasnitev namena, ne glede na to, kako privlačni se nam zdijo postopek, metoda ali pristop.
Although for many people the evaluation process is the least interesting part of Leader+, it is important, however, to ensure that the benefits arising from Leader+ and the involvement of all Leader actors is fully realised.Leader was conceived as a laboratory of rural development, and Leader I and II saw many rural areas develop bottom-up, innovative approaches to local development, some of which have matured to be included in mainstream rural development programmes.
Čeprav je proces vrednotenja za mnoge ljudi najmanj zanimiv del Leader+, je pomemben, ker zagotavlja, da se v celoti pokažejo prednosti, ki izhajajo iz Leader+, in vključitev vseh udeležencev Leader.
The Commission’s stated intention was that‘Leader+ will continue its role as a labo-ratory’ to deepen the experimentation started under Leader I and II.
Leader je bil zasnovan kot laboratorij za razvoj podeželja in v okviru Leader I in II je bilo veliko podeželskih območij, ki so se razvila od spodaj navzgor, in veliko inovativnih pristopov k lokalnemu razvoju, od katerih so nekateri dozoreli in se vključili v osrednje programe razvoja podeželja.
As such, Leader explores innovation through its ‘pilot actions’ and tests new theories, with the analysis of the results forming an integral part of the research process.
Komisija je izrazila namen, da bo„Leader+ nadaljeval svojo vlogo kot laboratorij“ in poglobil izvajanje poskusov, ki so se začeli na podlagi Leader I in II.
Analysis makes it possible to establish what works, and to learn for the future.
Leader kot tak raziskuje inovacije skozi svoje„pilotne dejavnosti“ in preskuša nove teorije z analizo rezultatov, ki tvorijo sestavni del raziskovalnega procesa.
In this respect Leader+ and its evaluation is no different. erent.
Z analizo je mogoče ugotoviti, kaj deluje, in se tako učiti za prihodnost.V tem smislu nista Leader+ in njegovo ovrednotenje nič drugačna.
on a range of practitioner perspectives in discussing issues which emerge from the experience of evaluating Leader and the implications of this in the future.
Pri razpravi o vprašanjih, ki se pojavljajo iz izkušenj pri vrednotenju Leader in njihovih posledic za prihodnost, izhaja iz vrste vidikov strokovnjakov s tega področja.
Making the case for evaluation effectiveness and eficiency of the proposals are also assessed. In the case of Leader+, the ex ante process was iterative, that is to say where evaluators worked alongside those developing the plan, informed about their process, and proposed and responded to changes.
ader+ je bil predhodni proces iterativen, se pravi, da so ocenjevalci delali skupaj s tistimi, ki so razvijali načrt, jih obveščali o poteku, predlagali spremembe ter se odzivali nanje.
• project against what was expected;to ensure that the lessons learned are identified and fed back into the development or decision-making process.
Obe vrednotenji se opravita, ko se strategija, program ali projekt zaključijo ali dosežejo vnaprej določeno stopnjo.
Evaluation is principally a policy and programme development tool.
Ovrednoti se, kaj sta projekt ali program dejansko dosegla glede na pričakovanja.
For example, the UK Treasury now defines evaluation as being ‘not about apportioning blame, but about learning from experience’.
Pri naknadnem vrednotenju se ovrednoti, kaj je projekt dosegel v primerjavi s tem, kaj bi bilo, če ne bi bilo storjeno nič, in ali obstajajo dodatne koristi.
The developmental role of evaluation may be characterised by its role in what is known as the Roamef (1) cycle as demonstrated in the diagram below.There are three principal stages of evaluation normally carried out in relation to the development cycle of programmes or initiatives.
Ta oblika vrednotenja se opravi na stopnji 5 zgoraj opisanega procesa in je odvisna od spremljanja izvajanja programa na stopnji 4. Rezultati se upoštevajo pri upravljanju preostalega dela programa in razvoju nadaljnjih programov.
These can be described in terms of the different elements of the cycle above, which in European programmes are commonly referred to as the ex ante, mid-term, and ex post evaluations.
V primeru Leader+ so bila vmesna vrednotenja podana na sredini programskega obdobja, kar je bilo v številnih primerih prezgodaj, da bi upoštevali dejanske rezultate v procesu.
The different purpose or role of each of these is outlined briefly below.
Zato so bila bolj osredotočena na načine izvedbe in ravni, ki so jih dejavnosti dosegle.
These evaluations are undertaken when a policy, programme or project is completed or has advanced to a predetermined degree.They examine what the project or programme has actually achieved against expectations and, in the case of ex post, what it has achieved by comparison with what would have been the case if nothing had been done, and the additionality.
Primarni razlogi za vrednotenje so dvojni in se lahko opišejo takole:• preučitev rezultatov, ki izhajajo iz programa ali projekta, v primerjavi s tem, kar je bilo pričakovano,• zagotovitev, da bodo nova spoznanja prepoznana in vključena v proces razvoja ali sprejemanja odločitev.Ocenjevanje je načeloma orodje za razvoj strategije in programa.
This form of evaluation takes place at stage 5 in the above process and is dependent on the monitoring of the programme’s implementation at stage 4.
Ministrstvo za finance Združenega kraljestva zdaj na primer opredeljuje vrednotenje kot nekaj „pri čemer ne gre za iskanje krivca, temveč za učenje iz izkušenj“.
The results feed into the management of the remainder of the programme and the development of successor programmes.
Vlogo, ki jo ima vrednotenje pri razvoju, je mogoče opredeliti z njegovo vlogo v tem, kar je znano kot cikel ROA-MEF1, ki je prikazan v spodnjem diagramu.Obstajajo tri glavne stopnje vrednotenja, ki se normalno izvedejo v zvezi z razvojnim ciklom programov ali pobud.
In the case of Leader+, the mid-term evaluations took place at the mid-point of the programming period, which in many instances was too early in the process to consider actual results.
Te se lahko opišejo glede na različne elemente zgornjega cikla, ki se v evropskih programih navadno navajajo kot „predhodno“, „vmesno“ in „naknadno“ vrednotenje.
These were therefore more concerned with the implementation arrangements and levels of activity achieved.Before thinking about the specific relevance to Leader, there are a number of more generic factors relating to small-scale rural development which are of relevance.
Različni nameni ali vloge vsakega od teh so na kratko opisani v nadaljevanju.
e ex ante evaluation
Razvoj podeželja manjšega obsega
Much rural development activity focuses on achieving change.
Veliko dejavnosti razvoja podeželja se osredotoča na doseganje sprememb.
Monitoring and evaluation measure this change and the effects of the activities supported in achieving this.
S spremljanjem in vrednotenjem se merijo spremembe in učinki dejavnosti, ki k temu pripomorejo.
This is carried out prior to the start of a programme as part of its development process, and is in effect a pre-appraisal of the proposed programme; it represents stage 3 of the above cycle.
To se izvede pred začetkom programa, kot del razvojnega procesa, in je dejansko predhodna ocena predlaganega programa ter predstavlja stopnjo 3 v zgornjem ciklu.
The potential
1 Utemeljitev
5 Evaluation
5 Vrednotenje jih je težko količinsko opredeliti.
2 Objectives dificult to quantify.To measure the effects of small-scale rural development it is therefore important to plan the approach well in advance, to think through what is trying to be changed and what else might change as a result of actions taken.
Za merjenje učinkov razvoja podeželja manjšega obsega je zato pomembno, da se pristop načrtuje precej vnaprej, da se premisli, kaj se skuša spremeniti in kaj bi se še utegnilo spremeniti zaradi sprejetih ukrepov.To vključuje kje, kdaj in za koga se bodo pojavile spremembe in katere osnovne informacije so potrebne, da se lahko zajameta obseg in velikost teh sprememb.
This includes where, when and to whom the effect will arise and what
Izhodišče je dejansko začetni položaj za vrsto kazalnikov, po katerih se meri učinkovi-
3 Appraisal
3 Ocena
4 Monitoring
4 Spremljanje
1) The acronym is based on the initial letter of each
Kratica temelji na začetnih črkah angleških nazivov za vsako od šestih stopenj (Rationale, Objectives, Appraisal, Monitoring, Evaluation, Feedback).
Process YellowProcess Black
Zbiranje rezultatov
baseline information is needed to capture the extent and magnitude of this change.
Na proces zbiranja in združevanja podatkov je mogoče gledati kot na piramido, ki ima vrh na ravni EU in temelje na ravni skupnosti.
Conventional indicators and evaluation approaches do not pick up the ‘tentacles’ of the integrated approach which are responsible for much of the more subtle and wider impact.
Pristop od spodaj navzgor vidi učinke iz prve roke in je odvisen od tega, ali so zabeleženi na osnovni ravni, ti pa se potem združujejo, da dajo informacijo za višje ravni.
The two previous generations of Leader have presented considerable di -culties in monitoring and evaluation.
Najobsežnejše informacije so torej na voljo na ravni lokalne skupnosti, vendar ni nujno, da se vse tam zbrane informacije prenašajo na zgornje ravni.