natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The obligation on the national standardisation bodies to pro-vide details of the nature of the new draft standard has the ob-jective of ensuring transparency and facilitating the examina-tion of noti«cations.Itarisesdirectlyfromtheprecedingparagraph.
Cilj obveznosti nacionalnih organov za standardizacijo, da za-gotovijo podrobnosti o naravi novega osnutka standarda, je zagotoviti preglednost in olajþati pregledovanje priglasitev. Iz-vira neposredno iz predhodnega odstavka.
The three categories of standards listed are in fact those which do not correspond to the `identical or equivalent transposition of an international standard' and must conse-quently be n o t i « e d u n d e r D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C .
Tri naþtete katego-rije standardov so v resnici tiste, ki ne ustrezajo ¶istovetnemu ali enakovrednemu prenosu mednarodnega standardaƒ in jih je zato treba priglasiti v skladu z Direktivo 98/34/ES.
› to suggest that the standard be prepared on a European rather than a national level.
› da predlagajo pripravo standarda na evropski namesto na nacionalni ravni.
This assumes that the national bodies are consulting industry by distributing the register as widely as possible, particularly through relays allowing easy access to the information.
To temelji na predpostavki, da se nacionalni organi posvetujejo z gospodarstvom tako, da ｲim þirþe razdelijo register, zlasti preko posrednikov, ki omogoｲajo lahek dostop do informacij.
› A new draft national standard could contain technical speci-«cationswhichmayconstituteabarriertothefreemove-ment of goods if the standard is used restrictively.
Pomembno je poudariti, da imajo zainteresirane strani, zlasti gospodarstvo, v praksi relativno malo ｲasa za odziv.
This can only be ascertained by examining these speci«cationsindi-vidually.
V primeru poznejþega spora bo dejstvo, da ni bil vlo™en ugovor, neizogib-no uporabljeno v þkodo tistih, ki niso pregledali registra.
It is important to emphasise that interested parties, particularly industry, in practice have only a relatively short period of time in which to react.
› Nacionalni standard, ki prenaþa mednarodni standard (ISO ali IEC), ni nujno enakovreden izvornemu dokumentu, saj prenos sam po sebi ni obvezen in se nacionalni organi za standardizacijo lahko v svojem imenu odloｲijo za spremem-be, ｲe menijo, da tehniｲne speci«kacijenisoustreznezanji-hov trg. V takem primeru je priporoｲljivo ovrednotiti tehniｲ-no speci«kacijoprenesenegastandardagledenatistidel,kise razlikuje od mednarodnega standarda.
As far as new standardisation subjects in the «eldoftelecom-munications is concerned, ETSI has been involved in the infor-mation procedure since it was included in Annex I to Directive 98/34/EC.
V zvezi z novimi predmeti standardizacije na podroｲju teleko-munikacij je ETSI vkljuｲen v postopek obveþｲanja, odkar je bil vkljuｲen v Prilogo I Direktive 98/34/ES.
› A national standard transposing an international standard (ISO or IEC) may not be equivalent to the original document, since this transposition is not, as such, compulsory and since the national standardisation bodies can decide, on their own account, to make amendments if they consider that the technical speci«cationsarenotrelevanttotheirownmarket.In this case, it is advisable to evaluate the technical speci«ca-tion of the transposed standard with regard to the part which di.ersfromtheinternationalstandard.
› Nacionalni standard se lahko spremeni, da se prilagodi teh-niｲnemu napredku. Priglasitev osnutka potem omogoｲa, da se preuｲi, ali bi sprememba (dopolnitev, prilagoditev ali ｲrtanje nekaterih tehniｲnih speci«kacij)lahkouvedlanovatveganja za trgovinske ovire v Skupnosti.
This paragraph supplements paragraph (1).
Komisija ima vlogo centra za posredovanje informacij, ki te informacije posreduje drugim dr™avam ｲlanicam.
It stipulates that the Commission must not only be informed of new national initiatives but that it must also have access to all the standards programmes drawn up by the national and European stand-ardisation bodies.
ropskega standarda, ｲe menijo, da bi predvidena sprememba upraviｲevala uvedbo raziskave novega predmeta na evropski ravni.
In addition, in the course of this examination, the national stand-ardisation bodies, the European standardisation bodies and the Commission can, if they consider that the envisaged amend-ment would merit setting up a new subject for research on a Eu-ropean level, suggest the preparation of a European standard.
Na podroｲju standardizacije je cilj Direktive 98/34/ES zagotovi-ti preglednost nacionalnih pobud, svojo vlogo pa ima tudi pri spodbujanju razvoja evropske standardizacije.
In order to ful«lthisrequirement,thelatterarenolongerunderthe obligation, as initially provided under Directive 83/189/EEC, of notifying their standards programmes on an annual basis (through the central secretariats of CEN and CENELEC), but they must communicate all or part of these programmes if the Com-mission so requests.
Ta odstavek doloｲa, da je Komisija pooblaþｲena za a™uriranje seznama nacionalnih organov za standardizacijo iz Priloge II k Direktivi.
The Commission acts as a clearing house for forwarding this information to the Member States.
To a™uriranje opravijo dr™ave ｲlanice, ki morajo Komisiji dati potrebne informacije.
In the « e l d o fst a n d a r d i s a t i o n , t h e a i m o f D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C i s t o ensure the transparency of national initiatives, but it also has a role to play in encouraging the development of European standardisation.
Po posvetu z odborom iz ｲlena 5 lahko Komisija sestavi pravila za celotno predstavitev teh informacij ter naｲrt in merila, ki urejajo predstavitev teh informacij, da bi olajþala svoje vrednotenje.
Where appropriate, the Commission shall amend Annex II on the basis of communications from the Member States.
Svet na podlagi predloga Komisije odloｲa o kakrþni koli spre-membi Priloge I.
After consulting the Committee referred to in Article 5, the Com-mission may draw up rules for the consolidated presentation of this information and a plan and criteria governing the presenta-tion of this information in order to facilitate its evaluation.
Ta odstavek doloｲa, da v nasprotju s Prilogo II posodabljanje Pri-loge I, ki vsebuje seznam uradno priznanih evropskih organov za standardizacijo, ni v izrecni pristojnosti Komisije, ampak je zanj potreben sklep Sveta ministrov na podlagi predloga Komisije.
This paragraph stipulates that the Commission has the author-ity to update the list of national standardisation bodies which appears in Annex II to the Directive.
Peprav je izvajanje postopka za zbiranje informacij na podroｲju standardov s pogodbo preneseno na CEN in CENELEC, Komisija sama nadzoruje njegovo pravilnost, zlasti tako da si je pridr™ala pravico predlagati, da ta evropska organa za standardizacijo sprejmeta metodologijo za predstavitev zbranih informacij zaradi zagotovitve la™je obdelave.
This updating is carried out by the Member States, which must provide the Commission with the necessary information.
Priloga I k Direktivi je bila na primer spremenjena leta 1992, da bi bil na seznam evropskih organov za standardizacijo dodan ETSI.
The Council shall decide, on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, on any amendment to Annex I.
Komisija lahko zahteva prenos dela ali vseh programov standardov.
Although the operation of the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandardshasbeendelegatedbycontract to CEN and CENELEC, the Commission itself supervises its proper functioning, in particular by retaining the option of suggesting that the two European standardisation bodies adopt a methodology for the presentation of the collected in-formation, in order to ensure easier processing.
Te informacije da na razpolago dr™avam ｲlanicam v obliki, ki omogoｲa vrednotenje in primerjavo razliｲnih programov.
This paragraph stipulates that, unlike Annex II, the updating of Annex I, containing the list of o / c i a l l y r e c o g n i s e d E u r op e a n s t a n d a r d i s a t i o n bodies, does not come under the exclusive juris-diction of the Commission but requires a decision by the Council of Ministers on the basis of a proposal from the Commission.
Obveþｲanje evropskih in nacionalnih organov za standardi-zacijo ter Komisije o osnutkih standardov
The Commission may ask for all or part of the standards pro-grammes to be communicated to it.
Ta odstavek dopolnjuje odstavek (1). Doloｲa, da ni dovolj, da je Komisija obveþｲena o novih nacionalnih pobudah, ampak mora imeti tudi dostop do vseh standardizacijskih programov, ki jih pripravijo nacionalni in evropski organi za standardizacijo.
It shall make this information available to the Member States in a form which allows the di.erentprogrammestobeassessedandcompared.
Standardizacijskim organom, navedenim v prilogah I in II, in Ko-misiji se na ™eljo poþljejo vsi osnutki standardov; zadevni organ jih bo sproti obveþｲal o ukrepih, sprejetih v zvezi z vsemi njihovimi pripombami o osnutkih.
Annex I to the Directive was, for example, amended in 1992 in order to add ETSI to the list of European standardisation bodies.
Da bi nacionalni in evropski organi za standardizacijo izpolnili to zahtevo, niso veｲ dol™ni priglaþati standardizacijskih progra-mov (prek centralnih sekretariatov CEN in CENELEC) letno, kot je v zaｲetku doloｲala Direktiva 83/189/EGS, ampak morajo po-slati vse ali del teh programov, ｲe Komisija to zahteva.
Decision 92/400/EEC, already cited.
Odloｲba 92/400/EGS, ™e citirana.
Communication of draft standards to the European and na-tional standardisation bodies and the Commission
› objavijo osnutke standardov tako, da lahko poþljejo svoje pripombe tudi stranke s sede™em v drugih dr™avah ｲlanicah, cah pravico od organa za standardizacijo dr™ave ｲlanice zahte-vati, da jim poþlje besedilo katerega koli osnutka standarda, ki ga je priglasil. Organ mora to zahtevo izpolniti.
The standardisation bodies referred to in Annexes I and II, and the Commission, shall be sent all draft standards on request; they shall be kept informed by the body concerned of the action taken on any comments they have made relating to drafts.
V skladu s tem pododstavkom mora vsaka dr™ava ｲlanica zago-toviti, da njen organ za standardizacijo partnerjem po vsej Uniji omogoｲi dajanje pripomb na nacionalne osnutke standardov.
› publish the draft standards in such a way that comments may also be obtained from parties established in other Member States,
To pomeni, da se javna obravnava, ki je na nacionalni ravni bistvena stopnja na koncu procesa priprave standarda pred potrditvijo in objavo konｲnega besedila, razþiri v druge dr™ave ｲlanice.
It is also required to inform all those who have commented on one of these drafts of the action taken: whether amendment to the draft, the withdrawal of the draft or the justi«cationforre-taining it.
To for-malno posvetovanje z vsemi dru™benoekonomskimi subjekti nacionalnim telesom za standardizacijo omogoｲa, da se prepri-ｲajo o popolnem soglasju glede besedila.
According to this subparagraph, each Member State must en-sure that its standardisation body provides parties throughout the Union with the opportunity of commenting on national draft standards.
V ｲlenu 4 (tako kot v ｲlenu 7) je doloｲena obveznost dr™av ｲla-nic v zvezi z organizacijo postopka za zagotavljanje informacij na podroｲju standardov.
Article 4 (like Article 7) sets out Member States' obligations with regard to the organisation of the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandards.Itisanobligationastotheresult, not the means, because whilst a Directive must be trans-posed into internal law by the Member States to which it is ad-dressed, the choice of transposition method is left to the Mem-ber States, as long as the objective pursued is attained.
Obveznost se nanaþa na rezultat in ne sredstva, saj morajo dr™ave ｲlanice, na katere je Direktiva na-slovljena, to direktivo sicer prenesti v svojo notranjo zakonoda-jo, lahko pa izbirajo metodo prenosa, pod pogojem da je ™eleni cilj dose™en.
Basically, each national body sends, on request, a copy of any draft standard to all the standardisation bodies of the other Member States.
To predvsem pomeni, da vsak nacionalni organ na zahtevo po-þlje izvod vsakega osnutka standarda vsem organom za stan-dardizacijo drugih dr™av ｲlanic.
This copy is obviously written in the working language of the issuing body.
Seveda je ta izvod napisan v delovnem jeziku izdajateljskega organa.
The recipients are responsible for having it translated into their own language and organising a consultation on their own territory, in accordance with the pro-cedures in force in the country (the draft standard is, for exam-ple, sent by the national body to the standards engineer re-sponsible for the sector concerned, who in turn passes it on to
Prejemniki so odgo-vorni za njegov prevod v svoj jezik in organizicijo posvetovanja na svojem ozemlju skladno s postopki, ki veljajo v njihovi dr™a-vi (nacionalni organ na primer poþlje osnutek standarda in™e-nirju, ki se ukvarja s standardi in je odgovoren za zadevni sek-tor, ta pa ga nato poþlje ustreznemu odboru za standardizacijo, ki ga sestavljajo vse zainteresirane strani).
Furthermore, the fact that most of the national standardisation bodies have the status of a private institution reduces the na-tional authorities' scope to give them orders.
Dejstvo, da ima veｲina nacionalnih organov za standardizacijo status zasebne institucije, tudi zmanjþuje pristojnost nacional-nih organov, da jim ukazujejo.
Hence the very ‹ e x i b l e w o r d i n g o ft h e D i r e c t i v e i n t h i s c o n t e x t .
Zato je besedilo Direktive na tem mestu zelo prilagodljivo.
the relevant standardisation committee which is composed of all the interested parties).
dardizacijo ne bi poskuþali ovirati dela pri tehniｲni harmoniza-ciji, ki ga opravljajo evropski organi za standardizacijo, s tem da bi prepreｲili, da se standard, ki ga sami nameravajo pripraviti na nacionalni ravni, navsezadnje pripravi na evropski ravni.
standard being prepared in another Member State, without at-tending the working meetings in the Member State con-cerned.
Direktiva zahteva od vseh dr™av ｲlanic, da drugim nacionalnim inþtitutom (AFNOR, DIN, BSI itd.) zagotovijo pravico, da se nji-hovi ustrezni organi vkljuｲijo v delo pri pripravi standarda v ustreznem tehniｲnem odboru.
The possibility of intervention is evaluated by the national standardisation body, which chooses one or other type of in-volvement.
Direktiva 98/34/ES vsebuje takþno doloｲbo zato, ker so vsi na-cionalni organi za standardizacijo ｲlani CEN in CENELEC in bi tako v skladu s povsem nacionalnimi interesi lahko glasovali proti obravnavi osnutka standarda na evropski ravni.
A questionnaire, usually attached to the draft standard by the body which prepared it, calls for comments regarding the ob-jectives of Directive 98/34/EC (for example, `Do you think that such a draft may result in barriers to trade?' `Do you think that it should be used as a basis for European work?' `Would you like to be involved in the work of preparation on the standardisa-tion committee? etc.).
Pri aktivni vkljuｲitvi se predpostavlja, da poþljejo opazovalca (proizvajalca, gospodarski subjekt ali in™enirja za standardizaci-jo). Pe ni na voljo proizvajalca ali gospodarskega subjekta in je odloｲeno, da bodo poslali in™enirja za standardizacijo, mora ta poznati polo™aj panoge v svoji dr™avi, da bo dovolj dobro poznal trg in bo lahko povedal, ali osnutek standarda pomeni tveganje za oviranje prostega pretoka blaga na zadevnem trgu ali ne.
The draft is then returned to the issuing body, with comments from all the economic and social operators of the various Mem-ber States of the Community.
Strokov-njak na primer poda mnenje o osnutku standarda v pripravi v drugi dr™avi ｲlanici, ne da bi se udele™eval delovnih sestankov v tej dr™avi.
› grant the other bodies referred to in Annex II the right to be in-volved passively or actively (by sending an observer) in the planned activities,
Mo™nost za poseganje oceni nacionalni organ za standardizaci-jo, ki se odloｲi za eno ali drugo vrsto sodelovanja.
› do not object to a subject for standardisation in their work pro-gramme being discussed at European level in accordance with the rules laid down by the European standardisation bodies and undertake no action which may prejudice a decision in this re-gard.
Odstavek (2) doloｲa, da se dr™ave ｲlanice ne morejo odreｲi svo-jih odgovornosti, s tem da bi se izgovarjale na odgovornost svojih organov za standardizacijo, ｲe ti sprejmejo standard v nasprotju z doloｲbami Direktive 98/34/ES.
The Directive requires all the Member States to ensure that their respective bodies grant another national institute (AF-NOR, DIN, BSI, etc.) the right to be involved in the work of pre-paring a standard, on the relevant technical committee.
Pe dr™ave ｲlanice niso mogle prepreｲiti sprejetja dokumenta zasebnega izvora in prostovoljne uporabe v nasprotju s pravom Skupnosti, morajo prepreｲiti, da bi se tak standard uporabljal kot referenｲni do-kument, tako da odklonijo, da bi ga priznale ali uradno sprejele.
This right of involvement may be exercised passively or actively.
Z drugimi besedami, ｲe nacionalni organi ravnajo nerazumno, nacionalne vlade polo™aja ne bi smele izkoriþｲati.
In this subparagraph, the Directive calls on the Member States to make every e.orttoensurethattheirrespectivestandardi-sation bodies do not attempt to impede the work of technical harmonisation being carried out by the European standardisa-tion bodies, by preventing a draft standard which they intend to prepare on a national level from ultimately being prepared at the European level.
Direktiva od nacionalnih organov ne more uradno zahtevati, da sprejmejo pripombe drugih nacionalnih organov, vendar pa bi moralo biti sprejetje pripomb naｲeloma zagotovljeno, saj vsi standardizacijski postopki doloｲajo, da si organi za standardi-zacijo prizadevajo upoþtevati te pripombe.
Active involvement assumes that an observer will be sent (a manufacturer, an economic operator or a standards engineer).
Obveznost dr™av ｲlanic, da zagotovijo neovirano tehniｲno usklajevanje na evropski ravni
Directive 98/34/EC contains such a provision because the na-tional standardisation bodies are all members of CEN and CENELEC and could therefore use their votes, in accordance with purely national interests, to oppose a draft standard be-ing considered at a European level.
› ne nasprotujejo, da se o predmetu standardizacije v njihovem delovnem naｲrtu razpravlja na evropski ravni v skladu s pravili, ki jih doloｲijo evropski standardizacijski organi, in ne sprejmejo no-benih ukrepov, ki bi lahko vplivali na odloｲitev v zvezi s tem.
A proposal to prepare a European standard, made by a national standardisation body to CEN or CENELEC, has to receive the support of a minimum of countries for the Central Secretariat of CEN or CENELEC to propose its acceptance to the Technical Board.
V tem pododstavku Direktiva poziva dr™ave ｲlanice, naj si kar v najveｲji meri prizadevajo zagotoviti, da njihovi organi za stan-
do not carry out any work on the mandated subject: wheth-er with regard to the preparation of a new standard or the amendment of an existing one which is not a European standard in extenso.
ne sprejmejo nobenega ukrepa, ki bi lahko vplival na naｲrtovano uskladitev, in zlasti da na zadevnem podroｲju ne objavijo novega ali revidiranega nacionalnega standarda, ki ni popolnoma uskla-jen s sedanjim evropskim standardom.
Paragraph (2) stipulates that the Member States cannot abdi-cate their responsibilities by taking refuge behind those of their respective standardisation bodies, where the latter have adopt-ed a standard in breach of a provision of Directive 98/34/EC.
Ta ｲlen doloｲa, da morajo dr™ave ｲlanice zagotoviti, da njihovi organi za standardizacijo spoþtujejo obdobje mirovanja, ko je te-koｲe delo na evropski ravni povezano s pripravo evropskega stan-darda, ki ga zahteva Komisija.
In other words, if the national bodies act unreasonably, the national governments should not exploit the situation.
Ta mo™nost je omenjena v prvi alinei ｲlena 6(3) Direktive (glej spodaj), ki doloｲa, da lahko Komisija od evropskih organov zahteva, da pripravijo evropski standard.
The Member States' obligation to ensure that European tech-nical harmonisation is not impeded
Dr™ave ｲlanice sporoｲijo Komisiji vse take zahteve, ki so navedene v prejþnjem pododstavku, kot osnutke tehniｲnih predpisov v skla-du s ｲlenom 8(1) in navedejo razloge za njihovo uzakonitev.
The standstill obligation remains after the adoption of the European standard.
Odstavek (2) tega ｲlena se nanaþa na posebne primere, v kate-rih je treba doseｲi obvezno uporabo standardov.
As a result, when an industry requires standards in the fields covered by the requested standard, the work may not be carried out on national level.
To se nanaþa na sposobnost dr™ave, da za proizvode iz teh standardov v ne-katerih razmerah uveljavi spoþtovanje tehniｲnih speci«kacij.
1 Member States shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that, during the preparation of a European standard referred to in the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 6 ( 3 ) o r a ft e r i t s a p p r o v a l , t h e i r s t a n d a r d i s a t i o n bo d i e s do not take any action which could prejudice the harmoni-sation intended and, in particular, that they do not publish in the «eldinquestionaneworrevisednationalstandardwhichisnotcompletely in line with an existing European standard.
Dr™ava lahko za uveljavitev spoþtovanja standardov, ki so sicer neobvezni, uporabi dva postopka:
This Article stipulates that the Member States must ensure that their respective standardisation bodies observe a standstill period when the work in progress at European level relates to the prepa-ration of a European standard requested by the Commission.
To obdobje mirovanja izra™a solidarnost, ki jo je treba uveljav-ljati z minimalnim omejevanjem, potem ko je sprejeta odloｲi-tev o skupnem delu na evropski ravni.
This eventuality is mentioned in the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 6 ( 3 ) o ft h e D i r e c t i v e (see below), which provides that the Commission can re-quest the European bodies to prepare a European standard.
Je sestavni del poslovni-kov evropskih organov za standardizacijo in ga Direktiva 98/34/ES þe poudarja.
Paragraph (2) of this Article concerns speci«ccasesinwhichthe standards are to be made compulsory.
› lahko pa obstojeｲe standarde proglasi za obvezne in jih s tem spremeni v tehniｲne predpise.
In this case, therefore, the Member States must do every-thing possible to ensure that their standardisation bodies
Zato dejavnosti ni mogoｲe opravljati na nacionalni ravni, ko neka gospodarska panoga potrebuje standarde na podroｲju, ki ga zajema zahtevani standard. S tem ｲlenom torej
In order to enforce the observance of standards which are es-sentially voluntary, the State may use two procedures:
V takþnih primerih se uporabi postopek, ki velja za tehniｲne predpise, opisan v naslednjem poglavju.
› it may request its country's standardisation body to prepare standards in view of establishing technical regulations;
Poglavje III: Postopek, ki se uporablja za tehniｲne predpise varnosti kemiｲnih snovi, kakor je navedeno v ｲlenu 10(4) Uredbe (EGS) þt.
› the State can also make existing standards compulsory, and in doing so, transform them into technical regulations.
793/93 za obstojeｲe snovi ali v ｲlenu 3(2) Direktive 67/548/EGS za novo snov.
In such cases, the procedure applicable to technical regula-tions, described in the following Chapter, is used.
Sporoｲanje in razþirjanje informacij o osnutkih tehniｲnih predpisov ter kako se lahko odzovejo Komisija in dr™ave ｲlanice
Chapter III: The procedure applicable to technical regulations
Komisija nemudoma uradno obvesti druge dr™ave ｲlanice o osnut-ku in vseh dokumentih, ki jih je prejela; da bi pridobila mnenje, lahko ta osnutek predlo™i tudi odboru iz ｲlena 5 in, kadar je pri-merno, odboru, pristojnemu za to podroｲje.