natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In July 2006, a new case was brought before the Court of Justice that could shed an additional light on the consequences of the PNR judgment, and in particular on the issue of the legal loophole.
V skupni pobudi, v kateri je novembra lani v okviru Mednarodne konference neodvisnih državnih organov s področja varstva podatkov in zasebnosti v Lon-donu(47) sodeloval tudi ENVP, je bila predlagana vzporedna obravnava ohranjanja osebnih svoboščin in ohranjanja okolja.
In the case C-301/06, Ireland v. European Parliament and Council, the validity of the data retention Directive 2006/24/EC (42) is at stake for reasons that there would be no legal basis under the third pillar to oblige private companies to collect and store communications data for the purpose of law enforcement.
„Zasebnost in varstvo podatkov sta lahko dragocena kot zrak, ki ga dihamo: oboje je nevidno, a ko ju ni več, ima to lahko enako pogubne učinke.“ Na temelju te vzporednice je mogoče primerjati nadzor in onesnaženje; strokovno znanje, ki ga je razvila EU na področju preprečevanja in nadzora one-snaževanja(48), lahko, ob uporabi zamisli o najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologijah, zagotovi dragocene izkušnje, ki bodo omogočile ublažitev tveganja za družbo nadzorovanja.
e European institutions invest continuously in research, implementation and use of new technologies in order to build a competitive European information society according to the Lisbon agenda.
Evropske institucije stalno vlagajo v raziskave, izvajanje in uporabo novih tehnologij, da bi zgradile konkurenčno evropsko informacijsko družbo, v skladu z Lizbonsko agendo.
In October 2006, the EDPS requested to the Court to intervene, in support of the conclusions of the defendants mainly because this case offers the possibility to clarify the Court judgment in the PNR cases. is position does not mean that the EDPS abandons his critical evaluation on the substance of the directive (43).
Evropska informacijska družba pa bo trajnostna samo v primeru, če bodo te tehnologije ustrezno zasnovane in izvajane tako, da bodo učinkovite prispevale k evropskemu okviru za varstvo podatkov in varnejšemu okolju.
A public hearing in the third case was held in September 2006, at which oral comments were made on behalf of the EDPS.
Javna obravnava v tretji zadevi je potekala septembra 2006, na njej so bile podane ustne pripombe v imenu ENVP.
In February 2007, the case had not yet been decided.
Februarja 2007 zadeva še ni bila zaključena.
See also paragraph 2.7 of this annual report.
Glej tudi odstavek 2.7 tega letnega poročila.)
(45) Available on the website: http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/ site/mySite/lang/en/pid/21 (46) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European
Na voljo na spletni strani: http://www.edps. europa.eu/EDPSWEB/edps/site/mySite/lang/en/pid/21
Annual Report 2006 valuable lessons in order to mitigate the risks of a surveillance society.
Letno poročilo 2006
In order to follow the FP7 closely, the EDPS decided f i first to take an active part to its launching
Raziskave in razvoj za varstvo zasebnosti in podatkov
Based on this first experience, the EDPS will develop several models of contribution to targeted research projects of the FP7.
V življenjskem ciklu razvoja novih tehnologij je treba takoj, ko bo mogoče, uporabljati zahteve na področju varstva zasebnosti in podatkov.
Research projects of the FP7 usually have the obligation to involve partners coming from several Members States. e EDPS could also, in this case, contribute to the cooperation between the corresponding data protection authorities which would be involved.
ENVP meni, da bi načelo „privacy by design“ (že ob zasnovi z vgrajenim spoštovanjem zasebnosti) moralo biti sestavni del prizadevanj EU za raziskave in razvoj.
e joint initiative in which the EDPS took part last November during the International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners in London (47), suggested drawing a parallel between the preservation of individual liberties and the preservation of the environment.
Konec leta 2006 je Komisija objavila in uvedla Sedmi raziskovalni program (49) (7OP), katerega najpomembnejši del se nanaša na tehnologije informacijske družbe.
‘Privacy and data protection may be as precious as the air we breathe: both are invisible, but when they are no longer available, the effects may be equally disastrous.’ Based on this parallel, surveillance can be compared with pollution and the expertise developed by the EU on the prevention and control of pollution (48) using the concept of BATs could offer er
Da bi zagotovil podrobno spremljanje 7OP, se je ENVP odločil, da bo najprej dejavno sodeloval pri njegovi uvodni predstavitvi, tj. konferenci o TID, ki je potekala leta 2006 v Helsinkih; s tem je želel doseči naslednje: n ul l
Annual Report 2006 on the Council framework decision will continue to require attention of the EDPS.
Letno poročilo 2006
Other areas of specific attention e inventory 2007 gives an overview of the most important trends and risks related to data protection that are expected to affect the EDPS’ consultative work and lists his priorities.
Podatke si izmenjuje z organi držav članic, pristojnimi za kazenski pregon, organi na ravni EU, denimo z Europolom, ter s tretjimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami.
It builds on the annual report 2005.
Takšna izmenjava terja zaščitne ukrepe, med drugim tudi v zvezi z učinkovitim nadzorom.
Area of freedom, security and justice
dostop in uporabo osebnih podatkov, ki so bili prvotno zbrani za druge namene, za potrebe kazenskega pregona.
•Electronic communications and information society (Information Society and Media DG)In the short term, the review of the EU regulatory framework (including Directive 2002/58/EC) will be an essential benchmark.
Najavljen je bil predlog, po katerem naj bi organom kazenskega pregona omogočili dostop do vseh zbirk podatkov v okviru Eurodac, vzpostavljenih v okviru prvega stebra.
In the long term, the trend seems to be a perspective of an information society where every person can be traced, for instance because of the growing importance of RFID.
Zaprosila za takšen dostop povzročajo posebne težave tudi zaradi stebrnega ustroja Pogodbe EU in prevlade zaščite, predvidene v okviru prvega stebra(50).
•Public health (Health and Consumer Protection DG)ere is a general trend for increased collection and exchange of information related to health, which by nature (health data are sensitive data) presents risks for data subjects. is trend is even more important in the light of the growing digitisation of health data and in the light of the notion of traceability.
ENVP meni, da ti trendi kličejo po oblikovanju primernega okvira za varstvo podatkov v okviru tretjega stebra, vključno s pravili o učinkoviti delitvi pristojnosti in o nadzoru nad pristojnimi telesi. Glede na to, da napredek pri pogajanjih o okvirnem sklepu Sveta ni zadovoljiv, bo ENVP temu moral še naprej posvečati ustrezno pozornost.
ere have been rapid developments in the area of freedom, security and justice (in its wider sense, including Title VI of the EU Treaty).
•Vprašanja preglednosti (SG COM).Pobude v smeri spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov, ki mora razjasniti razmerje med dostopom javnosti in varstvom podatkov: ENVP namerava v zvezi s tem izdati mnenje in institucijam pred in po sprejetju ustreznih predlogov Komisije po potrebi svetovati.
At the very end of 2006, the objectives of the German presidency of the Council were revealed and became even clearer in January 2007. e increased need for storage and exchange of personal data for law enforcement purposes, mentioned in the inventory 2007, plays an even more central role.
V tej zvezi bi utegnil biti pomemben tudi izid zadev, ki so v teku pred Sodiščem prve stopnje (glej odstavek 3.4).
For this reason, the presidency envisages tabling a formal proposal to transpose the Prüm Treaty into instruments of EU legislation.
Druga vprašanja, ki terjajo posebno pozornost
•Anti-fraud (European Anti-Fraud Office, OLAF)OLAF is of special importance to the EDPS, since it is a Community body under supervision of the EDPS with executive powers in the Member States.
•Elektronske komunikacije in informacijska družba (DG INFSO).Kratkoročno bo ključna preizkušnja pregled regulativnega okvira EU (vključno z Direktivo 2002/58/ES).
It exchanges data with law enforcement authorities of the Member States, authorities at EU level such as Europol and third countries and international organisations. is exchange requires safeguards, including on effective supervision.
Dolgoročno pa je videti, da se trend nagiba k takšni bodoči informacijski družbi, v kateri bo mogoče slede-nje vsaki osebi, med drugim zahvaljujoč naraščajočemu pomenu identificiranja na osnovi radijskih frekvenc (RFID – radio-frequency based identification).
is move would allow authorities of EU Member States to give one another automatic access to genetic records, fingerprints and traffic offences.
Poskrbljeno bo za utrditev in večjo učinkovitost delovnih metod ENVP na vseh področjih politik EU.
It also implies obligations to store (and share) personal information such as DNA which fits within a second trend, the use of biometrics becoming more and more prevalent.
Generalni direktorat za energetiko in promet bo naslednja izmed služb Komisije, s katerimi bo ENVP vzpostavil delovne stike, in sicer zaradi zakonodajnih dejavnosti v zvezi z računalniško podprtim rezervacijskim sistemom za zračni prevoz.
Furthermore, a third continuing trend is the establishment and improvement of databases at a European level, supporting exchange between Member States, such as SIS II, VIS and the Europol information system. e fourth trend to mention is the increased pressure on the access and use of personal data for law enforcement purposes that had originally been collected for other purposes.
ENVP si želi, da bi do konca leta 2007 vzpostavil dobre delovne odnose z vsemi službami Komisije, kolikor utegnejo biti pomembne za njegovo poslanstvo.
A proposal has been announced to also open up for law enforcement the databases of Eurodac, established under the first pillar.
Opiral se bo na notranja sporočila, ki jih v okviru Komisije pripravljata generalni sekretar Komisije in njena uradna oseba za varstvo podatkov, ter poudarjajo pristojnosti ENVP.
Requests for this type of access also raise particular difficulties as a result of the pillar structure of the EU Treaty and the primacy of the protection provided for under the first pillar (50).
Pozornosti bodo deležni specifični vidiki odločitev Komisije (glej tudi odstavek 3.2.1).
For the EDPS, these trends require the establishment of an adequate framework for data protection in the third pillar, including the rules on effective division of responsibilities and on supervision of responsible entities. e unsatisfactory progress of the negotiations
•Javno zdravje (DG SANCO).Obstaja splošen trend vse obsežnejšega zbiranja in izmenjave podatkov v zvezi z zdravstvenim stanjem, kar že samo po sebi (podatki v zvezi z zdravstvenim stanjem so občutljivi podatki) predstavlja tveganje za posameznike, na katere se ti podatki nanašajo.
50) Article 47 of the EU Treaty.
ENVP namerava nadgrajevati obstoječe dobro potekajoče stike in pozitivne izkušnje.
e EDPS’ working method will be consolidated and made effective in all EU policy areas.
)Člen 47 Pogodbe EU.
In April 2006, when adopting its work programme for 2006–07, the working party took an important decision (52), with firm support of the EDPS.
Aprila 2006 je Delovna skupina ob sprejemanju delovnega programa za obdobje 2006–2007 s trdno podporo ENVP sprejela(52) zelo pomembno odločitev.
It decided to concentrate on a limited number of strategic issues aiming at contributing to a common understanding of key provisions of Directives 95/46/EC and 2002/28/EC and ensuring a better implementation of them.
Sklenila se je namreč osredotočiti na omejeno število strateških vprašanj, da bi tako prispevala k skupnemu razumevanju ključnih določb direktiv 95/46/ES in 2002/28/ES ter k skrbi za njihovo boljše izvajanje.
In accordance with this programme, the working party has been addressing subjects which merit separate atten-tion, such as the impact of radio frequency identification (RFID) and identity management, especially in e-government, and e-health patient records.
Skladno s tem programom se Delovna skupina loteva tem, ki se jim velja posvečati ločeno, denimo vpliva RFID in upravljanja identitete, zlasti pri e-vladi in ezdravstvenih kartotekah.
At the same time, the working party developed a better common understanding of key concepts, such as ‘personal data’ and ‘consent’, and special rules for processing of medical data in Articles 2 and 8 of Directive 95/46/EC. e EDPS participated closely in these activities and looks forward to their results in the course of 2007.
Obenem je Delovna skupina dosegla boljše skupno razumevanje ključnih pojmov, denimo „osebnih podatkov“ in „soglasja“, ter opredelila posebna pravila za obdelovanje zdravstvenih podatkov iz členov 2 in 8 Direktive 95/46/ES. ENVP je tesno sodeloval pri vseh teh dejavnostih in z zadovoljstvom pričakuje njihove rezultate v letu 2007.
e Article 29 Working Party was established by Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC.
Delovna skupina iz člena 29 je bila ustanovljena s členom 29 Direktive 95/46/ES.
It is an independent advisory body on the protection of personal data within the scope of this directive (51).
Je neodvisno posvetovalno telo, pristojno za področje varstva osebnih podatkov v okviru področja uporabe navedene direktive(51).
Its tasks have been laid down in Article 30 of the directive and can be summarised as follows:•providing expert opinion from Member State level to the European Commission on matters relating to data protection;•promoting the uniform application of the general principles of the directive in all Member States through cooperation between data protection supervisory authorities;•advising the Commission on any Community measures affecting the rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data;•making recommendations to the public at large, and in particular to Community institutions, on matters relating to the protection of persons with regard to the processing of personal data in the European Community.
Njegove naloge so opredeljene v členu 30 navedene direktive in jih je mogoče povzeti takole:•zagotavljanje strokovnih mnenj, pripravljenih na ravni držav članic za Evropsko komisijo, o zadevah v zvezi z varstvom podatkov;•spodbujanje enotne uporabe splošnih načel iz direktive v vseh državah članicah, in sicer prek sodelovanja med nadzornimi organi za varstvo podatkov;•svetovanje Komisiji o vseh ukrepih Skupnosti, ki zadevajo pravice in svoboščine fizičnih oseb v zvezi z obdelavo osebnih podatkov;•naslavljanje priporočil na širšo javnost, zlasti pa na institucije Skupnosti, o zadevah v zvezi z varstvom oseb pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v Evropski skupnosti.
In 2006, the EDPS also contributed to the working party’s activities in the field of international transfers to third countries. is concerned particularly the issue of airline passenger data, in the light of the European Court of Justice’s judgment in the PNR cases, and the subsequent need for negotiations with the United States (see paragraph 3.4).
V letu 2006 je ENVP prav tako prispeval k dejavnostim Delovne skupine na področju mednarodnih prenosov v tretje države. Tu je šlo zlasti za vprašanje podatkov o letalskih potnikih v luči sodbe Evropskega sodišča o zadevah v zvezi z identifikacijskimi podatki o potnikih, in za potrebo, ki se je s tem pojavila, po pogajanjih z ZDA (glej odstavek 3.4).
On this basis, the working party developed the outline of a longterm strategy and adopted various opinions (53) on related issues: e EDPS has been a member of the Article 29 Working Party since early 2004.
Na tej podlagi je Delovna skupina pripravila očrt dolgoročne strategije in sprejela različna mnenja (53) o tozadevnih vprašanjih:
Article 46(g) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 provides that the EDPS participates in the activities of the working party. e EDPS considers this to be a very important platform for cooperation with national supervisory authorities.
ENVP je član Delovne skupine iz člena 29 od začetka leta 2004. Člen 46(g) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 določa, da ENVP sodeluje pri dejavnostih zadevne delovne skupine.
It is also evident that the working party should play a central
ENVP meni, da je to zelo pomembna platforma za sodelovanje z nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi.
(52) Work programme 2006–07, adopted on 5 April 2006 (WP 120).
) Delovni program 2006–2007, sprejet 5. aprila 2006 (WP 120). Dosto- pen na: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2006_en.htm
accessible from the same link as the work programme.
) Ta in druga mnenja Delovne skupine, omenjena v tem poglavju, so
53 kg703914inside.indd 53
ENVP) ter predstavnik Komisije.
Opinion 5/2006 on the ruling by the European Court of Justice of 30 May 2006 in Joined Cases C-317/04 and C-318/04 on the transmission of passenger name records to the United States, adopted on 14 June 2006 (WP 122);Opinion 7/2006 on the ruling by the European Court of Justice of 30 May 2006 in Joined Cases C-317/04 and C-318/04 on the transmission of passenger name records to the United States and the urgent need for a new agreement, adopted on 27 September 2006 (WP 124);Opinion 9/2006 on the implementation of Directive 2004/82/EC of the Council on the obligation of carriers to communicate advance passenger data, adopted on 27 September 2006 (WP 127).
Mnenje 7/2006 o odločitvi Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 30. maja 2006 v združenih zadevah C-317/04 in C-318/04 o prenosu evidence imen letalskih potnikov Združenim državam in o nujni potrebi po novem sporazumu, sprejeto 27. septembra 2006 (WP 124);Mnenje 9/2006 o izvajanju Direktive Sveta 2004/82/ES o dolžnosti prevoznikov, da posredujejo podatke o potnikih, sprejeto 27. septembra 2006 (WP 127).
The EDPS also actively contributed to opinions highlighting the meaning of relevant provisions in the European data protection framework in different areas, such as:•Opinion 1/2006 on the application of EU data protection rules to internal whistle-blowing schemes in the fields of accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing matters, fight against bribery, banking and financial crime, adopted on 1 February 2006 (WP 117);•Opinion 2/2006 on privacy issues related to the provision of email screening services, adopted on 21 February 2006 (WP 118).
ENVP je prav tako dejavno prispeval k mnenjem, ki so opozarjala na pomen ustreznih določb iz evropskega okvira za varstvo podatkov na različnih področjih, denimo:•Mnenje 1/2006 o uporabi pravil EU o varstvu podatkov v notranjih shemah za prijavo nepravilnosti na področju računovodstva, internih računovodskih kontrol, revizijskih zadev, boja proti podkupovanju, bančnemu in finančnemu kriminalu, sprejeto 1. februarja 2006 (WP 117), in•Mnenje 2/2006 o vprašanjih zasebnosti pri zagotavljanu storitev pregledovanja elektronske pošte, sprejeto 21. februarja 2006 (WP 118).
e working party issued a number of opinions on proposals for legislation.
Delovna skupina je izdala vrsto mnenj o zakonodajnih predlogih.
In some cases these proposals had been the subject of an opinion of the EDPS on the basis of Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001. e EDPS opinion is a compulsory feature of the EU legislative process, but the opinions of the working party are of course also extremely useful, particularly since they may contain additional points of attention from a national perspective.
V nekaterih primerih je na podlagi člena 28(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 o teh predlogih podal mnenje tudi ENVP. Mnenje ENVP je obvezen del zakonodajnega procesa v EU, vendar pa so tudi mnenja Delovne skupine seveda izjemno koristna, zlasti ker so v njih z nacionalne perspektive lahko obravnavana tudi dodatna vprašanja.
According to Article 46(f)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, the EDPS must also cooperate with national supervisory authorities to the extent necessary for the performance of their duties, in particular by exchanging all useful information and requesting or delivering other assistance in the execution of their tasks. is cooperation takes place on a case-by-case basis. e SWIFT case was an example of multilateral cooperation in which the Article 29 Working Party (56) played a very useful role (see also paragraph 2.5).
Skladno s členom 46(f)(i) Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 mora ENVP sodelovati tudi z nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi, in sicer do mere, do katere je to potrebno za opravljanje njihovih nalog, zlasti z izmenjavo koristnih informacij in z zaprosili za drugačne oblike pomoči pri njihovem delu ali z njihovim zagotavljanjem. Potek takšnega sodelovanja je odvisen od posameznega primera.
e direct cooperation with national authorities is growing even more relevant in the context of international systems such as Eurodac and the proposed Visa Information System (VIS), which require effective joint supervision (see paragraph 2.9).
Zadeva SWIFT je primer večstranskega sodelovanja, pri katerem je Delovna skupina iz člena 29 (56)odigrala zelo koristno vlogo (glej tudi odstavek 2.5).
In another case, the EDPS preferred to collaborate even more closely in one single opinion, without issuing his own comments.
Spet drugič pa je ENVP dal prednost še tesnejšemu sodelovanju pri oblikovanju enega samega mnenja, brez objave svojih lastnih pripomb.
Examples of good synergy between the working party and the EDPS in this field have been:•Opinion 3/2006 on the Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC, adopted on 25 March 2006 (WP 119) (54);•Opinion 6/2006 on the proposal for a Council regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations, adopted on 9 August 2006 (WP 123) (55); e Austrian Presidency decided to convene two meetings of the Council Working Party on Data Protection.
Mnenje 3/2006 o Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2006/24/ES o hrambi podatkov, pridobljenih ali obdelanih v zvezi z zagotavljanjem javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ali javnih komunikacijskih omrežij, in spremembi Direktive 2002/58/ES, sprejeto 25. marca 2006 (WP 119) (54);Mnenje 6/2006 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb ter sodelovanju v preživninskih zadevah, sprejeto 9. augusta 2006 (WP 123)(55);Mnenje 8/2006 o pregledu regulativnega okvira za elektronske komunikacije in storitve s poudarkom na Direktivi o zasebnosti in elektronskih komunikacijah, sprejeto 26. septembra 2006 (WP 126).
(56) See Opinion 10/2006 on the processing of personal data by the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), adopted on 22 November 2006 (WP 128).
) Glej Mnenje 10/2006 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov Družbe za svetovne
after adoption of Directive 2006/24/EC, for consideration at national level implementing the directive.
) V tem mnenju so bili ponovno navedeni bistveni zaščitni ukrepi pri hrambi podatkov o prometu, ki bi jih bilo po sprejetju Direktive 2006/24/ES treba upoštevati na nacionalni ravni ob uveljavitvi zadevne direktive.
See also EDPS opinion of 26 September 2005 on the Commission proposal. (55) See also EDPS opinion issued on 15 May 2006.
Glej tudi mnenje ENVP z dne 26. septembra 2005 o ustreznem predlogu Komisije.)Glej tudi mnenje ENVP z dne 15. maja 2006.
Annual Report 2006 initiative and convened a third meeting during the autumn of 2006.
Letno poročilo 2006
e EDPS welcomed the initiative as a useful opportunity to ensure a more horizontal approach in first pillar matters.
ENVP je to pobudo pozdravil kot koristno priložnost za prehod k bolj horizontalnemu pristopu, ko gre za zadeve iz prvega stebra.
During the second meeting, he presented his annual report 2005.
Med drugo sejo je predstavil letno poročilo za leto 2005.