natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional Policy Unit B1 – Communication, Information, Relations with third countries Ana-Paula Laissy Avenue de Tervuren 41, B-1040 Brussels Fax: (32-2) 29-66003E-mail: regio-info@ec.europa.eu Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index_en.htm
Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za regionalno politiko Enota B1 – Komunikacije, informacije, odnosi s tretjimi državami Ana-Paula Laissy Avenue de Tervuren 41, B-1040 Bruselj Faks: (32-2) 29-66003E-pošta: regio-info@ec.europa.eu Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index_en.htm
_BAR_ No 26 _BAR_ June 2008 _BAR_ panorama
_BAR_ Št. 26 _BAR_ junij 2008 _BAR_ panorama
Looking back to 1988 A debate between ocials of the European Commission
Kohezijska politika EU 1988–2008: vlaganje v prihodnost Evrope
Structural Funds 1994 - 1999 : Eligible Areas
Strukturni skladi 1994–1999: upravičena območja
Structural Funds 2000 - 2006 : Eligible Areas
Cilj 1*: v celoti upravičena območja
Objective 6: Partly eligible
Cilj 6: delno upravičena območja
Objective 1
Cilja 5b in 6: delno upravičena območja
Objective 2: Wholly eligible
Cilj 2: v celoti upravičena območja
Sweden, Finland and Austria eligible for aid from 1995.Abruzzo eligible for aid under Objective 1 for the period 1 January 1994 to 31 December 1996.Situation of Non EU countries in 1999.
Švedska, Finska in Avstrija upravičene do pomoči od leta 1995.Regija Abruzzo upravičena do pomoči na podlagi cilja 1 za obdobje od 1. januarja 1994 do 31. decembra 1996.Položaj držav, ki niso članice EU, leta 1999.
Phasing-out Regions
Cilja 2 in 6: delno upravičena območja
Objective 2: Partly eligible
Cilj 2: delno upravičena območja
* with a GDP/head below 75% of the EU average
* regije z BDP na prebivalca pod 75 % povprečja EU
Objective 2 & 5b Objective 5b: Wholly eligible
Cilja 2 in 5b: delno upravičena območja
Objective 2 & 5b: Partly eligible Phasing-out (till 31/12/2006)
Cilj 5b: v celoti upravičena območja
Competitiveness and Employment Regions
Cilja 2, 5b in 6: delno upravičena območja
Objective 5b: Partly eligible
Cilj 5b: delno upravičena območja
Objective 6: Wholly eligible
Cilj 6: v celoti upravičena območja
Objective 1: 1994 - 1996
Cilj 1: 1994–1996
Director-General Dirk Ahner
Generalni direktor Dirk Ahner
DIRK AHNER, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DIRECTOR-GENERAL FOR REGIONAL POLICY
DIRK AHNER,EVROPSKAKOMISIJA, GENERALNI DIREKTORZAREGIONALNOPOLITIKO
Since then, Cohesion Policy has framed the Community’s interventions by using a strategic approach at European, national and regional level.
Dragi bralci in bralke, in regionalni ravni.
It has adapted over time without losing sight of its core orientation, namely to work towards the balanced and sustainable development of Europe’s regions.
Sčasoma se je prilagodila, vendar je še vedno usmerjena k istemu cilju, tj. delovanju za uravnotežen in trajnostni razvoj regij v Evropi.
It has made and continues to make it possible for national, regional and local governments to engage in overarching strategies and networks across policies and country borders.
Nacionalnim, regionalnim in lokalnim vladam je omogočila in jim še vedno omogoča sodelovanje v obsežnih strategijah in omrežjih, ki povezujejo različne politike in presegajo nacionalne meje.
This issue of Panorama Magazine is exclusively dedicated to the first 20 years of EU Cohesion Policy.
ta številka revije Panorama je posvečena izključno prvim 20 letom kohezijske politike EU.
On 24 June 1988, the Council agreed on a regulation which put existing EU funds into the context of 'econ- omic and social cohesion’, a term which the Single European Act had introduced two years earlier.
Svet je 24. junija 1988 sprejel uredbo, s katero je tedanje sklade EU vključil na področje „ekonomske in socialne kohezije“, ki je izraz, ki je bil dve leti pred tem uveden v Enotnem evropskem aktu.
Since then, Cohesion Policy has become one of the most important and most debated EU policies.
Od takrat je kohezijska politika postala ena od najpomembnejših in najpogosteje obravnavanih politik EU.
We therefore thought it worthwhile to check how robust its rationale, implementation and impact has proven over the years.
Zato smo sklenili, da bi bilo ustrezno preveriti, kako verodostojni so bili v tem času njeni temelji, izvajanje in učinek.
“Cohesion Policy has adapted over time without losing sight of its core orientation, namely to work towards the balanced and sustainable development of Europe’s regions.”
„(Kohezijska politika) se je sčasoma prilagodila, vendar je še vedno usmerjena k svojemu ključnemu cilju, tj. delovanju za uravnotežen in trajnostni razvoj regij v Evropi.“
There is no one-size-ts-all recipe for regional development.
Za regionalni razvoj ni enotnega pristopa za vse.
However, principles such as partnership, transparency, subsidiarity and civil society participation combine to form an essential asset of development policies.
Vendar pa načela, kot so partnerstvo, preglednost, subsidiarnost in sodelovanje civilne družbe, skupaj sestavljajo bistveni del razvojnih politik.
They reinforce cooperation between the public and private sectors and have the potential to link eciency with decentralisation and active involvement.
Ta načela krepijo sodelovanje med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem ter omogočajo povezovanje učinkovitosti z decentralizacijo in dejavno udeležbo.
In this sense, Cohesion Policy is still as modern as it was in 1988.
V tem smislu je kohezijska politika še vedno tako napredna, kot je bila leta 1988.
I trust you will enjoy reading this publication.
Leta 1988 ni zaznamovalo le uvajanje te nove politike, ampak tudi konec razprave, ki se je začela nekaj let prej.
During 1988, we saw not only the beginning of this new policy, but also the end of a debate which had begun some years earlier.
Prepričan sem, da vam bo prebiranje te publikacije v veselje.
Since the end of the 1970s, integration of EU funds within targeted, multi-annual programmes had been tested in ‘Integrated Development Programmes’ and later in ‘Integrated Mediterranean Programmes’.
Od takrat kohezijska politika zagotavlja okvir za ukrepe Skupnosti z uporabo strateškega pristopa na evropski, nacionalni
DANUTAHÜBNER, MEMBEROFTHEEUROPEANCOMMISSION RESPONSIBLEFORREGIONALPOLICY
DANUTAHÜBNER, ČLANICAEVROPSKEKOMISIJE, ODGOVORNAZAREGIONALNOPOLITIKO
The objective of economic and social cohesion was expressed in the Single European Act and became reality in 1988 with the adoption of the first regulation which gave birth to Cohesion Policy.
Cilj ekonomske in socialne kohezije je bil določen v Enotnem evropskem aktu in se je uresničil leta 1988 s sprejetjem prve uredbe, ki je pomenila začetek kohezijske politike.
The Treaties of Maastricht, Amsterdam and Nice reaffirmed the policy’s importance and its scope was even broadened by the draft Lisbon Treaty by a new, territorial dimension.
Pogodbe iz Maastrichta, Amsterdama in Nice so znova potrdile pomen te politike, z osnutkom lizbonske pogodbe pa se je njeno področje uporabe še razširilo z novim ozemeljskim vidikom.
European Councils in 1988, 1992, 1999 and 2005 confirmed the importance of Cohesion Policy by allocating increasing shares of the European budget to it.
Evropski sveti iz leta 1988, 1992, 1999 in 2005 so z dodelitvijo večjega deleža evropskega proračuna kohezijski politiki potrdili njen pomen.
However, when we look back today on the first 20 years of EU Cohesion Policy, 1988 remains a crucial year.
Kljub temu leto 1988 ostaja ključno leto prvih dvajsetih let izvajanja kohezijske politike EU.
Discovering Europe’s economic geographyhassincethenmarked a radical turn for EU, national and regional policies alike.
Od takrat je spoznavanje ekonomske geografije Evrope povzročilo velike spremembe za evropsko, nacionalno in regionalno politiko.
Identifying the regions in most need, defining priorities, involving local institutions and imposing common management, control and evaluation standards – all these elements have not only created tangible results but also a unique system of multi-level governance.
Določanje regij z največjimi potrebami, opredeljevanje prednostnih nalog, vključevanje lokalnih institucij ter uvajanje skupnih standardov za upravljanje, nadzor in ocenjevanje so elementi, ki so poleg konkretnih rezultatov ustvarili tudi edinstven sistem upravljanja na več ravneh.
Cohesion Policy makes clear that every- body, wherever they are in the Union, has the opportunity to participate in and benefit from the common market.
Kohezijska politika je „vidna roka“ trga, katere cilja sta uravnotežen in trajnostni razvoj ter spodbujanje gospodarskega povezovanja po vsej EU.
Cohesion Policy is the market’s 'visible
Poleg tega pa je tudi politika, ki temelji na
“Cohesion Policy is the market’s 'visible hand' which aims at balanced and sustainable development while fostering economic integration throughout the EU as a whole.”
„Kohezijska politika je ,vidna roka‘ trga, katere cilja sta uravnotežen in trajnostni razvoj ter spodbujanje gospodarskega povezovanja po vsej EU.“
At the level of the regions, relatively strong economic growth of those with a low GDP per head has meant that EU regions have been converging.
prostoru in vsakemu evropskemu območju zagotavlja vlogo, saj ne ovira najboljše mogoče razporeditve gospodarskih dejavnosti, ampak lahko postane sama po sebi vir rasti.
Between 1995 and 2004, the number of regions with a GDP per head below 75 % of the EU average fell from 78 to 70 and the number of those below 50 % of the EU average declined from 39 to 32.
Nedavne ekonomske teorije ta pristop potrjujejo s številnimi študijami primerov, ki dokazujejo, da „je geograja pomembna“ in da je učinek regionalne politike lahko pozitiven.
hand' which aims at balanced and sustainable development while fostering economic integration throughout the EU as a whole.
Kohezijska politika izboljšuje konkurenčni položaj regionalnih gospodarstev z zagotavljanjem „evropskih“ javnih dobrin, ki jih trg ne more zagotoviti.
And it is a place-based policy which gives a role to each European territory in the sense that it is not an obstacle to the optimal allocation of econ- omic activity but can become a source of growth on its own.
Primeri tega so velika prometna in energetska omrežja, prava evropska okoljska politika, vlaganje v izobraževanje, raziskave in razvoj.
In its first 20 years of existence, has EU Cohesion Policy been able to deliver?
Ali je bila kohezijska politika EU v prvih 20 letih uspešna?
In fact, the EU has achieved impressive economic and social convergence since 1988.
EU je od leta 1988 dejansko dosegla izrazito gospodarsko in socialno zbliževanje.
At national level, Greece, Spain, Ireland and Portugal – the largest beneficiaries of Cohesion Policy in recent years – have experienced significant growth.
Na nacionalni ravni so Grčija, Španija, Irska in Portugalska, ki so bile v zadnjih letih največje upravičenke do pomoči kohezijske politike, dosegle precejšnjo rast.
Between 1995 and 2005, Greece reduced the gap with the rest of the EU-27, moving from 74 % to reach 88 % of the EU’s average gross domestic product per head.
Grčija se je med letoma 1995 in 2005 približala drugim državam EU-27 in v primerjavi s prejšnjimi 74 % dosegla 88 % povprečnega bruto domačega proizvoda na prebivalca v EU.
By the same year, Spain had moved from 91 % to 102 %, and Ireland reached 145 % of the Union's average starting from 102 %.
Do tega leta je tudi Španija od 91 % prešla na 102 %, Irska pa od 102 % na 145 % povprečja Unije.
We can expect similar results in the new Member States, where Cohesion Policy has just begun to take effect, underpinning the high growth rates.
Podobne rezultate lahko pričakujemo v novih državah članicah, v katerih se je kohezijska politika šele začela izvajati in bo povzročila visoke stopnje rasti.
Today Cohesion Policy is a fully fledged development policy, based on assets and people which are on the spot. This is a key advantage in addressing new challenges which face European territories.
STRAN4 bodo nujne spremembe politike trga delovne sile, nova socialna tveganja zaradi gospodarskih sprememb pa bodo zahtevala nove pristope.
It is worth mentioning that during the current period, Cohesion Policy has made a radical shift in investment priorities.
obdobju temeljito spremenile prednostne naloge kohezijske politike na področju vla-ganja.
A quarter of resources are now earmarked for research and innovation and about 30 % for environmental infrastructure and measures combating climate change.
Četrtina sredstev se zdaj namenja za raziskave in inovacije, približno 30 % pa za okoljsko infrastrukturo in ukrepe za boj proti podnebnim spremembam.
Economists tell us that regional and local development – combining economic growth and reduced geographical disparities – will be increasingly important in meeting these challenges.
Ekonomisti pravijo, da bosta pri obvladovanju teh izzivov vse pomembnejša regionalni in lokalni razvoj, ki bosta združila gospodarsko rast in zmanjševanje geografskih razlik.
The debate on the future of Cohesion Policy must be seen in this context.
V tem okviru je treba obravnavati razpravo o prihodnosti kohezijske politike.
The achievements of our policy have been also noted by other countries.
Vendar dodana vrednost kohezijske politike presega vlaganje v rast in ustvarjanje delovnih mest.
But Cohesion Policy's added value goes beyond investment in growth and jobs.
Dosežke naše politike so opazile tudi druge države.
Through its unique model of multi-level governance it involves local and regional actors in the policy design and delivery, bringing in more eciency and local knowledge.
Zaradi njihovega zanimanja je Komisija sklenila memorandume o soglasju o sodelovanju na področju regionalne politike s Kitajsko, Rusijo in Brazilijo, ki se srečujejo z vse večjimi regionalnimi neskladji in veliki izzivi, povezanimi z boljšim vodenjem, ter morajo pri procesih oblikovanja politike in sprejemanja odločitev več pozornosti nameniti toku informacij od spodaj navzgor.
It ‘levers-in’ and safeguards compliance with other Community policies – be it in the field of state aids, environment, transport, support for innovation or the information society.
Številne druge države in organizacije (Južna Afrika, Ukrajina, Mercosur, Zahodnoafriška gospodarska in monetarna unija) je izrazilo veliko zanimanje za model kohezijske politike EU, ker se glede na njegov omejeni obseg proračuna obravnava kot zelo učinkovit mehanizem.
It works as a ‘Trojan horse’ to improve and modernise public administrations, to enhance transparency, and to foster good governance.
Kohezijska politika je danes celovita razvojna politika, ki temelji na sredstvih in ljudeh na kraju samem.
Last not least, it makes people work together through numerous crossborder and transnational programmes and networks.
To je ključna prednost pri obvladovanju novih izzivov, s katerimi se srečujejo evropska ozemlja.
“Through international cooperation Cohesion Policy is projecting European values beyond the territories of the Union.”
„Kohezijska politika prek mednarodnega sodelovanja evropske vrednote razširja na območja zunaj Unije.“
VLADIMÍRŠPIDLA,MEMBEROFTHEEUROPEAN COMMISSIONRESPONSIBLEFOREMPLOYMENT, SOCIALAFFAIRSANDEQUALOPPORTUNITIES
VLADIMÍRŠPIDLA,ČLANEVROPSKEKOMISIJE, ODGOVORENZAZAPOSLOVANJE, SOCIALNEZADEVEINENAKEMOŽNOSTI osemdesetih let 20. stoletja so povzročili nove izzive in zahtevali nove pristope.
The Commission took an important de- cision to support further training for new technologies through the ESF.
Komisija je sprejela pomembno odločitev, da bo prek ESS podpirala nadaljnje usposabljanje za nove tehnologije.
The European Social Fund has been investing in people for more than 50 years.
> oblikovala se je nova in širša vizija evropske solidarnosti: pomoč ESS se je razširila, da je zajela socialno kohezijo, da bi pomagali revnejšim regijam z visoko brezposelnostjo; > poleg tega je načrtovanje večletnih programov omogočilo osredotočenje na dolgoročne cilje in Evropski socialni sklad že več kot 50 let vlaga v ljudi.
The Union’s founding fathers proved both their visionary foresight and pragmatism when they enshrined the fund in the Treaties of Rome.
Ustanovni očetje Unije so z vključitvijo sklada v Rimsko pogodbo dokazali svoje vizionarske sposobnosti in pragmatizem.
Today, the ESF finances activatingmeasures,qualityjobsby means of better qualications, is crucial for equal opportunities and it supports disadvantaged people.
Danes ESS financira spodbujevalne ukrepe, zagotavlja kakovostna delovna mesta z boljšimi kvalifikacijami, poleg tega pa je ključen za zagotavljanje enakih možnosti in pomoč prikrajšanim ljudem.
Of the approximately 10 million people who participate in ESF actions every year, half are women and some 1.2 million are older workers.
Med približno desetimi milijoni ljudi, ki vsako leto sodelujejo pri ukrepih ESS, je polovica žensk, približno 1,2 milijona pa starejših delavcev.
The 1988 reform marked an important change for the ESF in several respects: > A new, more extensive vision of European solidarity was established; ESF support was extended to embrace the dimension of social cohesion in order to support poorer regions with high unemployment; > Furthermore, multiannual programmes planning made it possible to concentrate on long-term objectives; and > Finally, the principle of partnership was born and has been developed steadily since. Instead of administering thousands of projects itself, the Commission now shares the programming and administration of ESF resources with the Member States and the regions. Whilst the ESF was initially designed to o-set the loss of jobs in the traditional industries by retraining workers, a new era began in the 1970s.
> nazadnje, oblikovalo se je načelo partnerstva, ki se od takrat postopno razvija. Namesto da bi Komisija sama upravljala več tisoč projektov, si odgovornost za načrtovanje in upravljanje sredstev ESS deli z državami članicami in regijami. Čeprav je bil ESS prvotno ustanovljen, da bi s ponovnim usposabljanjem delavcev nadomestil izgubljanje delovnih mest v tradicionalnih industrijah, se je v sedemdesetih letih 20. stoletja začelo novo obdobje.
For the first time, youth unemployment became a problem.
Prvič je težava postala brezposelnost mladih.
The European Commission therefore made support programmes for people under 25 a priority.
Zato je Evropska komisija podporne programe za osebe, mlajše od 25 let, določila kot prednostno nalogo.
This was also the era when support was extended to women, especially those with few skills and those returning to work.
V tem obdobju se je pomoč razširila tudi na ženske, zlasti tiste, ki imajo slabe kvali ka-cije ali se vračajo na delovna mesta.
The energy crisis, economic decline and record unemployment in the early 1980s brought new challenges but also new approaches.
Energetska kriza, gospodarsko nazadovanje in rekordno visoka brezposelnost v začetku
A new era of European integration began with the end of the Cold War including the perspective of accession for the countries of central and eastern Europe.
Novo obdobje evropskega povezovanja se je začelo s koncem hladne vojne, ki je omogočil pristop držav iz srednje in vzhodne Evrope.
In parallel, a new phase of globalisation began, with more rigorous demands on our citizens' occupational and geographical mobility.
Hkrati se je začela nova stopnja globalizacije, ki je okrepila zahteve po večji poklicni in geografski mobilnosti naših državljanov.
With the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997, the European Employment Strategy was launched and, since then, has played a central role in coordinating EU policies in order to create more and better jobs. The ESF became the European financial
Z začetkom veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe v letu 1997 se je začela evropska strategija zaposlovanja, ki ima od takrat ključno vlogo pri usklajevanju politik EU za ustvarjanje več in bolj-
“Together with the other Structural and Cohesion Funds, the ESF transforms the meaning of Europe’s values and solidarity into reality.”
„ESS skupaj z drugimi strukturnimi skladi in Kohezijskim skladom uresničuje pomen evropskih vrednot in solidarnosti.“
PAGE7 instrument for implementing the European Employment Strategy and is also one of the keystones of the Lisbon strategy.
STRAN7 ših delovnih mest. ESS je postal evropski finančni instrument za izvajanje evropske strategije zaposlovanja in je tudi eden od temeljnih kamnov lizbonske strategije.
more than ever. Such added value is not expensive but worth the eort, since the European Union must become more innovative and dynamic if it wants to compete in the global economy.
Takšna dodana vrednost ni draga, je pa vredna truda, saj mora Evropska unija postati bolj inovativna in dinamična, če želi biti konkurenčna v svetovnem gospodarstvu.
ESF programmes meet both national and local needs and they are built on a wide partnership.
Programi ESS izpolnjujejo nacionalne in lokalne potrebe ter temeljijo na širokem partnerstvu.
Negotiated and decided between the Member States and the European Commission, programmes are implemented through a wide range of organisations, both in the public and private sector.
Programi, o katerih se pogajajo in jih sprejmejo države članice in Evropska komisija, se izvajajo v različnih organizacijah v javnem in zasebnem sektorju.
These organisations include national, regional and local authorities, educational and training institutions, non-governmental organisations and the voluntary sector, as well as social partners, industry and professional associations, and individual companies.
Te organizacije vključujejo nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne organe, ustanove za izobraževanje in usposabljanje, nevladne organizacije in prostovoljni sektor, socialne partnerje, industrijo in poklicna združenja ter posamezna podjetja.
In the Union of 27 Member States, the two hundred million members of the European labour force are highly skilled but we need to raise our standards even higher, as there are global challenges ahead.
V Uniji s 27 državami članicami je visoko kvaliciranih dvesto milijonov članov evropske delovne sile, vendar moramo standarde še povišati, saj nas v prihodnosti čakajo svetovni izzivi.
Demographic ageing means that we cannot aord to waste anyone’s potential, be they young or old, nationals or migrants, university graduates or people without academic qualications.
Zaradi staranja prebivalstva ne smemo dopustiti izgubljanja potenciala posameznikov ne glede na to, ali so mladi ali stari, državljani ali priseljenci, univerzitetni diplomanti ali osebe brez akademske izobrazbe.
In addition, rapid technological and economic change calls for a high degree of flexibility on the part of companies and people in Europe.
Poleg tega hitre tehnološke in gospodarske spremembe zahtevajo visoko stopnjo prilagodljivosti podjetij in ljudi v Evropi.
The ESF can help to reconcile individuals' needs with labour market requirements.
ESS lahko prispeva k usklajevanju potreb posameznikov z zahtevami na trgu delovne sile.
It can help the Member States to realise their own flexibility and security – exicu-rity – agendas.
Državam članicam lahko pomaga pri uresničevanju njihovih programov za prilagodljivost in varnost, tj. prožno varnost.
Our asset is our human resources and our human potential and the ESF helps us to play this card strategically and successfully.
Naše premoženje so človeški viri in človeški potencial, ESS pa nam lahko pomaga, da to strateško in uspešno izkoristimo.
One hundred and seventeen ESF programmes worth over €75 billion were recently put on track for the period 2007-2013.
Pred kratkim se je začelo 117 programov ESS za obdobje 2007–2013 v skupni vrednosti več kot 75 milijard EUR.
For the years to come, these have to be converted into tangible results and progress on the ground.
V naslednjih letih jih je treba preoblikovati v konkretne rezultate in napredek v praksi.
More than ever, we must use the ESF where it has the greatest impact and concentrate our budget on corresponding priorities.
Bolj kot kdaj koli prej moramo ESS uporabljati tam, kjer ima največji vpliv, in naš proračun usmeriti v ustrezne prednostne naloge.