natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Although the Ombudsman did not find all of the complainant’s allegations to be justified, he concluded that the Commission’s decision to recover certain amounts constituted maladministration.
Čeprav po mnenju varuha človekovih pravic vse obtožbe pritožnika niso bile utemeljene, je ugotovil, da je odločitev Komis' e o izterjavi nekaterih zneskov pomenila nepravilnost.
In the interest of taking steps to se4 le the ma4 er, the Commission agreed to reassess the file. (2577/2004/OV)
Komis' a je pokazala zanimanje za rešitev te zadeve in soglašala, da bo ponovno ocenila ta spis. (2577/2004/OV)
!The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) repealed a contested decision a er the Ombudsman made a proposal for a friendly solution.
Po predlogu varuha človekovih pravic za sporazumno rešitev je Evropska agenc' a za varnost v letalstvu (EASA) razveljavila izpodb' ano odločitev.
The case concerned an EASA decision relating to the type-certification basis of certain aircra.
Primer je zadeval odločitev agenc' e EASA glede osnove za certifi kac' o tipa nekega zrakoplova.
A er analysing the relevant legal provisions, the Ombudsman was not convinced that the decision had a su cient legal basis.
Po preučitvi ustreznih predpisov varuh č lovekovih pravic ni bil prepričan, da je imela ta odločitev zadostno pravno podlago.
EASA replied by saying that it had now been able to obtain the information needed to issue a type certificate and had therefore repealed the contested decision. (1103/2006/BU)
EASA je odgovorila, da ji je zdaj uspelo pridobiti potrebne informac' e za izdajo certifikata tipa, in je zato razveljavila izpodb' ano odločitev. (1103/2006/BU)
!The former European Monitoring Centre for Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) accepted a friendly solution proposal by providing be4 er information to an unsuccessful tenderer about how his bid compared with that of the winning organisation.
Nekdanji Evropski center za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofob' e (EUMC) je sprejel predlog za sporazumno rešitev in je neuspešnemu ponudniku zagotovil boljše informac' e o primerjavi njegove ponudbe s ponudbo zmagovalne organizac' e.
The complainant had turned to the Ombudsman alleging that the EUMC had failed to give him satisfactory responses to his questions and had failed to apply transparent criteria.
Pritožnik se je obrnil na varuha č lovekovih pravic s trditv' o, da mu EUMC ni zagotovil zadovoljivih odgovorov na njegovo vprašanje in ni uporabil preglednih meril.
If a friendly solution is not possible or if the search for such a solution is unsuccessful, the Ombudsman either closes the case with a critical remark to the institution or body concerned or makes a dra recommendation.
Če sporazumna rešitev ni mogoča ali če je iskanje takšne rešitve neuspešno, lahko varuh človekovih pravic zaključi primer s kritično pripombo zadevni instituc' i ali organu ali pa sestavi osnutek priporočila.
A critical remark is normally made if (i) it is no longer possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the instance of maladministration, (ii) the maladministration appears to have no general implications, and (iii) no follow-up action by the Ombudsman seems necessary.
Kritično pripombo običajno sestavi, če (i) je prepozno, da bi zadevna instituc' a nepravilnost odpravila, (ii) se zdi, da nepravilnost nima splošnih posledic, ali (iii) se zdi, da nadaljnji ukrepi varuha človekovih pravic niso potrebni.
A critical remark is also made if the Ombudsman considers that a drarecommendation would serve no useful purpose or that it does not seem appropriate to submit a special report to Parliament in a case where the institution or body concerned fails to accept a dra recommendation.
Varuh človekovih pravic sestavi kritično pripombo tudi, če meni, da osnutek priporočila ne bi bil uporaben za ta namen, ali če se mu ne zdi primerno, da bi Parlamentu predložil posebno poročilo, kadar zadevna instituc' a ali organ ne sprejme osnutka priporočila.
!The Ombudsman criticised the Commission for failing to o� er valid reasons for not giving access to the annual accounting reports it receives from the Member States in relation to agricultural subsidies.
Varuh človekovih pravic je kritiziral Komis' o, ker ni utemeljeno obrazložila, zakaj ni omogočila dostopa do letnih računovodskih poročil, ki jih prejme od držav članic v zvezi s kmet' skimi subvenc' ami.
The Commission argued that the reports containing the information had been loaded onto a database and no longer existed as such.
Komis' a je trdila, da so bila poročila z informac' ami naložena v zbirko podatkov in kot taka ne obstajajo več.
The information requested by the complainant would require complex new programming of the database, it said.
Navedla je, da bi bilo za informac' e, ki jih je zahteval pritožnik, potrebno zapleteno ponovno programiranje zbirke podatkov.
Although considering the Commission’s approach to be unsatisfactory, the Ombudsman did not pursue the ma4 er further since the legal issues could be examined by the Community legislator, from a general perspective, in the context of the announced reform of Regulation 1049/2001 on access to documents. (1693/2005/PB)
Čeprav je varuh človekovih pravic menil, da pristop Komis' e ni zadovoljiv, je opustil nadaljnjo obravnavo te zadeve, ker bi zakonodajalec Skupnosti lahko preučil pravna vprašanja s splošnega vidika v okviru napovedane spremembe Uredbe 1049/2001 o dostopu do dokumentov. (1693/2005/PB)
It is important for the institutions and bodies to follow up critical remarks from the Ombudsman, taking action to resolve outstanding problems and thus to avoid maladministration in the future.
Za instituc' e in organe je pomembno, da spremljajo kritične pripombe varuha človekovih pravic, si prizadevajo odpraviti nastale težave ter se tako izognejo nepravilnostim v prihodnje.
During 2007, the Ombudsman carried out a study of the follow-up undertaken by the institutions involved to all critical remarks and further remarks made in 2006.
Leta 2007 je varuh človekovih pravic opravil štud' o nadaljnjih ukrepov instituc' , ki so leta 2006 prejele kritične pripombe in dodatne pripombe.
The study is available on the Ombudsman’s website (h4 p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu).
Štud' a je na voljo na spletni strani evropskega varuha človekovih pravic (h4 p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu).
The Ombudsman envisages carrying out a similar exercise and informing the public of his findings on an annual basis.
Varuh človekovih pravic načrtuje letno opravljanje podobne štud' e in obveščanje javnosti o svojih ugotovitvah.
In cases where follow-up action by the Ombudsman does appear necessary, that is, where it is possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the instance of maladministration, or in cases where the maladministration is particularly serious, or has general implications, the Ombudsman normally makes a dra recommendation to the institution or body concerned.
V primerih, v katerih se zd' o nadaljnji ukrepi varuha človekovih pravic potrebni, torej kadar je še vedno mogoče, da zadevna instituc' a nepravilnost odpravi, ali v primerih, v katerih so nepravilnosti še posebej resne oziroma imajo splošne posledice, varuh človekovih pravic običajno sestavi osnutek priporočila za to instituc' o ali organ.
Three cases were closed during the year when a drarecommendation was accepted by the institution.
Tr' e primeri so bili zaključeni med letom, ko je instituc' a sprejela osnutek priporočila.
The la4 er’s detailed opinion on the Ombudsman’s dra recommendation in this case (3643/2005/(GK)WP) is due to be delivered by the end of February 2008.
Parlament naj bi podrobno mnenje o osnutku priporočila varuha č lovekovih pravic v tem primeru (3643/2005/(GK)WP) predložil do konca februarja 2008.
In another drarecommendation made in 2007, the Ombudsman urged the Commission to avoid in the future any unjustified restrictions with regard to the o cial languages in which proposals under a call for tender may be submi4 ed (259/2005/(PB)GG).
Varuh č lovekovih pravic je v drugem osnutku priporočila iz leta 2007 Komis' o pozval, naj se v prihodnje izogiba neutemeljenim omejitvam v zvezi z uradnimi jeziki, v katerih se lahko predlož' o predlogi na podlagi javnih razpisov (259/2005/(PB)GG).
ANNUAL REPORT 2007
LETNO PORO Č ILO 2007 priporočila je temeljil na pritožbi pokojnikovega sina.
More than four years a er the death of his father, the Commission had asked him to pay back EUR 1 747.
Komis' a je od njega zahtevala, naj ji 1 747 EUR vrne več kot štiri leta po očetovi smrti.
If a Community institution or body fails to respond satisfactorily to a drarecommendation, the Ombudsman may send a special report to the European Parliament.
Če instituc' a ali organ Skupnosti na osnutek priporočila ne da zadovoljivega odgovora, lahko varuh č lovekovih pravic pošlje posebno poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu.
This constitutes the Ombudsman’s ultimate weapon and is the last substantive step he takes in dealing with a case, since the adoption of a resolution and the exercise of Parliament’s powers are ma4 ers for the la4 er’s political judgment.
To je zadnje orožje varuha č lovekovih pravic in njegov zadnji možni ukrep pri obravnavi primera, saj sta sprejetje resoluc' e in izvajanje pooblastil Parlamenta stvar politične sodbe slednjega.
!The Ombudsman submi4 ed a special report to the European Parliament, criticising the Commission for not dealing with a complaint concerning the European Working Time Directive.
Varuh človekovih pravic je Evropskemu parlamentu predložil posebno poročilo, v katerem je kritiziral Komis' o, ker ni obravnavala pritožbe glede evropske direktive o delovnem času.
More than six years ago, a German doctor asked the Commission to open proceedings against Germany, alleging that it was infringing the Directive.
Nemški zdravnik je pred več kot šestimi leti zaprosil Komis' o, naj sproži postopek proti Nemč' i zaradi domnevne kršitev te direktive.
Despite pressure from the Ombudsman, the Commission refrained from taking action on the complaint, arguing that its proposals for amending the Directive are before the Community legislator.
Komis' a se je kljub pritiskom varuha človekovih pravic vzdržala ukrepanja v zvezi s pritožbo, pri čemer je trdila, da so njeni predlogi za spremembo te direktive predloženi zakonodajalcu Skupnosti.
The Ombudsman insisted that this case raised an important issue of principle concerning the way the Commission deals with infringement complaints from citizens.
Varuh človekovih pravic je vztrajal, da je ta primer sprožil pomembno načelno vprašanje o načinu, na katerega Komis' a obravnava pritožbe državljanov zaradi kršitev.
The Commission should either reject the complaint, or open infringement proceedings, he said.
Izjavil je, da bi morala Komis' a zavrniti pritožbo ali pa sprožiti postopek zaradi kršitve. To, da se preprosto ne stori nič, ni v skladu z načeli dobrega upravljanja. (3453/2005/GG)
The Ombudsman makes use of his power to launch own-initiative inquiries in two main instances.
Varuh človekovih pravic uporabi svoje pooblastilo za sprožitev preiskave na lastno pobudo zlasti v dveh primerih.
Firstly, he may use it to investigate a possible case of maladministration when a complaint has been submi4 ed by a non-authorised person (i.e., when the complainant is not a citizen or resident of the Union or a legal person with a registered o ce in a Member State).
Prvič, uporabi ga lahko za preiskavo morebitnega primera nepravilnosti, če je pritožbo vložila nepooblaščena oseba (tj. pritožnik, ki ni državljan ali prebivalec Un' e niti pravna oseba z registriranim sedežem v državi članici).
Two such own-initiative inquiries were opened in 2007.
Leta 2007 sta bili sproženi dve taki preiskavi na lastno pobudo.
The Ombudsman may also use his own-initiative power to tackle what appears to be a systemic problem in the institutions.
Varuh človekovih pravic pa lahko sprožitev na lastno pobudo uporabi tudi za reševanje domnevnih sistemskih težav v instituc' ah. Na primer:
!In December 2007, the Ombudsman launched an own-initiative inquiry into the subject of the timeliness of payments made by the Commission.
Decembra 2007 je varuh človekovih pravic na lastno pobudo sprožil preiskavo o pravočasnosti plačil Komis' e.
He asked the Commission to provide information on what has been done to avoid late payment, statistical data on late payment cases, as well as information about the Commission’s policy on paying interest.
Komis' o je zaprosil za informac' e o sprejetih ukrepih za preprečevanje zamud pri izplačilih, statistične podatke o primerih zamujenih izplačil in informac' e o njeni politiki plačevanja obresti.
This follows complaints from individuals, companies and organisations involved in EU-funded projects and contracts. (OI/5/2007/GG)
Za to se je odločil na podlagi pritožb posameznikov, družb in organizac' , sodelujočih pri projektih in pogodbah, ki jih je financirala EU. (OI/5/2007/GG)
Among the other own-initiative inquiries opened in 2007 were one into EPSO’s computer-based testing (OI/4/2007/ID) and one concerning the management of human resources at the Commission’s Joint Research Centre (OI/6/2007/MHZ).
Med preiskavami, sproženimi na lastno pobudo v letu 2007, sta bili tudi preiskava o preverjanju znanja z uporabo računalnika, ki ga je opravljal EPSO (OI/4/2007/ID), in preiskava o upravljanju kadrov pri Skupnem raziskovalnem središču Komis' e. (OI/6/2007/MHZ)
The following own-initiative inquiry was closed during the year:
Med letom je bila končana naslednja preiskava na lastno pobudo.
!The Ombudsman concluded an own-initiative inquiry into the measures adopted by the Commission to ensure that people with disabilities are not discriminated against in their relations with the institution.
Varuh človekovih pravic je končal preiskavo na lastno pobudo o ukrepih, ki jih je Komis' a sprejela, da bi zagotovila preprečevanje diskriminac' e invalidov pri odnosih z instituc' o.
Among the positive measures he identified were those to provide easier access to information via the Commission’s website and to improve recruitment and
Podobno je ravnala v primeru 2577/2004/OV, ko je sprejela predlog za sporazumno rešitev in znižala znesek, ki naj bi ga izterjala od pogodbenika, sodelujočega pri projektu v Libanonu.
They serve as a model for the other EU institutions and bodies, in terms of how best to react to issues that the Ombudsman raises. The Commission, in particular, acted quickly and constructively to se4 le a range of grievances.
V drugem sporu zaradi plačila je sprejela osnutek priporočila, v katerem jo je varuh človekovih pravic pozval, naj ne izterja pokojnine, ki je bila napačno izplačana po smrti nekdanjega uslužbenca (1617/2005/(BB)JF).
In case 3495/2006/GG, it se4 led, within two weeks, a payment dispute with a German university a er the Ombudsman brought the problem to its a4 ention. Similarly, in case 2577/2004/OV, it accepted a proposal for a friendly solution and reduced the amount to be recovered from a contractor involved in a project in Lebanon.
Komis' a je dodatno potrdila, da je pripravljena konstruktivno sodelovati z varuhom človekovih pravic, ko je sprejela osnutek priporočila, v katerem jo je pozval, naj popravi netočne in zavajajoče informac' e na letakih in plakatih ter v videopredstavitvi o pravicah letalskih potnikov. (1476/2005/(BB)GG)
A final example of a positive response from the institutions and bodies in 2007 came in case 1103/2006/BU, where the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) repealed a contested decision a er the Ombudsman made a proposal for a friendly solution.
Zadnji primer pozitivnega odziva instituc' in organov v letu 2007 je primer 1103/2006/BU, pri katerem je Evropska agenc' a za varnost v letalstvu (EASA) po predlogu varuha človekovih pravic za sporazumno rešitev razveljavila izpodb' ano odločitev.
This is the second year running that one of EASA’s cases features among the star cases listed in this Report, which is testimony to its willingness to co-operate constructively with the Ombudsman.
Že drugo leto zapored se je eden od primerov agenc' e EASA uvrstil med nadvse uspešne primere, navedene v tem poročilu, kar dokazuje njeno pripravljenost za konstruktivno sodelovanje z varuhom človekovih pravic.
The final section of Chapter 2 of the Annual Report contains reviews of a selection of these and other cases from the perspective of the following thematic categories: (i) openness, including access to documents and information, as well as data protection; (ii) the Commission as guardian of the Treaty; (iii) tenders, contracts and grants; and (iv) personnel ma4 ers, including recruitment.
V sklepnem razdelku poglavja 2 letnega poročila so ti in drugi izbrani primeri še dodatno preučeni z vidika naslednjih tematskih vprašanj: (i) odprtosti, vključno z dostopom do dokumentov in informac' , ter varstva podatkov; (ii) Komis' e kot „varuha Pogodbe“; (iii) razpisov, pogodb in dotac' ter (iv) kadrovskih vprašanj, vključno z zaposlovanjem.
The summaries reflect the range of subjects and institutions covered by the Ombudsman’s inquiries and the di� erent types of finding. finding.
Povzetki prikazujejo različna področja in instituc' e, ki so bili zajeti v preiskave varuha č lovekovih pravic, ter različne vrste ugotovitev.
Decisions closing cases are normally published on the Ombudsman’s website (h4 p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu) in English and, if di� erent, the language of the complainant.
Vsi sklepi, ki jih varuh sprejme po končani preiskavi, so običajno objavljeni na spletni strani varuha č lovekovih pravic (h4 p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu) v angleščini in jeziku pritožnika, če ta ni angleš č ina.
The European Ombudsman devotes considerable time to meeting with Members and o cials of the EU institutions and bodies with a view to promoting a culture of service within the EU administration.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic posveti precej časa srečanjem s člani in uslužbenci organov in instituc' EU, da bi spodbujal storitveno kulturo v upravi EU.
Among the most important meetings to take place in 2007 were three events with civil servants from all levels within the European Commission.
Med najpomembnejšimi srečanji v letu 2007 so bila tri srečanja z javnimi uslužbenci Evropske komis' e z vseh ravni.
Since the Commission is the institution accounting for the highest proportion of inquiries carried out by the Ombudsman, it is particularly important that it take a leading role in developing a culture of service to citizens and of respect for their rights.
Ker je Komis' a instituc' a, v zvezi s katero varuh človekovih pravic opravi največpreiskav, je še posebej pomembno, da prevzame vodilno vlogo pri razv' anju storitvene kulture v odnosu do državljanov in spoštovanja njihovih pravic.
The feedback that the Ombudsman received during these meetings was very encouraging.
Varuh človekovih pravic je na teh srečanjih prejel zelo spodbuden odziv. Ključni osebi, ki sta mu omogočili ta tri srečanja, sta bili podpredsednica Komis' e Margot WALLSTRÖM, ki je med drugim pristojna za odnose z varuhom č lovekovih pravic, in generalna sekretarka Komis' e Catherine DAY.
ANNUAL REPORT 2007 responsible, inter alia, for relations with the Ombudsman, and Commission Secretary-General Catherine DAY.
LETNO PORO Č ILO 2007
The Ombudsman continued to reach out to the other institutions and bodies in 2007, holding meetings with key representatives of the European Court of Justice, the European Economic and Social Commi4 ee, the European Investment Bank, and the European Central Bank.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v letu 2007 ohranjal stike tudi z drugimi instituc' ami in organi ter se sestal s ključnimi predstavniki Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora, Evropske investic' ske banke in Evropske centralne banke.
To help keep his own sta� informed about developments in the other EU institutions and bodies, the Ombudsman uses the regular sta� meetings that he convenes in Strasbourg to invite external speakers.
Svoje uslužbence varuh obvešča o novicah v drugih instituc' ah in organih EU na rednih srečanjih zaposlenih, ki jih organizira v Strasbourgu in na katera povabi zunanje govornike.
The European Ombudsman co-operates closely with his counterparts in the Member States to make sure that citizens’ complaints about EU law are dealt with promptly and e� ectively.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic tesno sodeluje s kolegi v državah članicah, da bi zagotovili hitro in učinkovito obravnavo pritožb državljanov zaradi zakonodaje EU.
This co-operation takes place for the most part under the aegis of the European Network of Ombudsmen.
To sodelovanje poteka večinoma znotraj Evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic.
The Network now comprises almost 90 o ces in 31 countries, covering the national and regional levels within the Union, as well as the national level in the candidate countries for EU membership plus Norway and Iceland.
Ta mreža zdaj vključuje skoraj 90 podružnic v 31 državah ter obsega nacionalno in regionalno raven v Un' i ter nacionalno raven v državah kandidatkah za članstvo v EU, v Norveški in Island' i.
All 27 EU Member States were represented at the meeting, as were two of the three candidate countries, plus Norway and Iceland.
Na sestanku so bili predstavniki vseh 27 držav članic EU, dveh od treh držav kandidatk ter Norveške in Island' e.
In line with the announcement made by the European Ombudsman at the Fi h Seminar, regional ombudsman representatives from the EU countries where they exist, namely Belgium, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria, and the United Kingdom1, were also invited to take part for the first time.
V skladu z napovedjo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic na petem seminarju so bili k sodelovanju na tem sestanku prvičpovabljeni regionalni predstavniki varuhov človekovih pravic iz držav članic EU, v katerih te predstavnike imajo, in sicer iz Belg' e, Nemč' e, Špan' e, Ital' e, Avstr' e in Združenega kraljestva1.
The theme of the 2007 Seminar was “Rethinking good administration in the European Union”.
Tema seminarja v letu 2007 je bila „Ponovno presojanje dobrega upravljanja v Evropski un' i“.
The European Ombudsmen — Newsle4 er served as an extremely
Med letom se je nadaljeval razvoj forumov za razprave na internetu in izmenjavo dokumentov, kar je uradom omogočilo izmenjavo informac' z objavo vprašanj in odgovorov.
In addition to the regular informal exchanges of information through the Network, a special procedure exists through which national or regional ombudsmen may ask for wri4 en answers to queries about EU law and its interpretation, including queries that arise in their handling of specific cases.
Poleg redne neformalne izmenjave informac' prek mreže je na voljo tudi poseben postopek, s katerim lahko nacionalni ali regionalni varuhi človekovih pravic zapros' o za pisne odgovore na vprašanja o zakonodaji EU in njeni razlagi, vključno z vprašanji, ki se pojav' o pri njihovi obravnavi posebnih primerov.
The European Ombudsman either provides the answer directly or, if more appropriate, channels the query to another EU institution or body for response.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic odgovori na vprašanja neposredno, če je ustrezneje, pa za odgovor zaprosi drugo instituc' o ali organ EU.
Information visits to ombudsmen in the Member States and candidate countries have proved highly e� ective in terms of developing the Network and constitute an excellent means of raising awareness of the range of communications tools it makes available.
K razvoju mreže so pripomogli tudi informativni obiski varuhov človekovih pravic v državah č lanicah in državah kandidatkah, saj so odličen način za boljšo obveščenost o vrsti komunikac' skih orod' , ki jih mreža daje na voljo.
In the course of 2007, the European Ombudsman visited his ombudsman colleagues in Germany (March), Sweden (May), and Belgium (November).
V letu 2007 je evropski varuh človekovih pravic obiskal svoje kolege v Nemč' i (marca), na Švedskem (maja) in v Belg' i (novembra).
The Ombudsman’s e� orts to collaborate with his counterparts stretch beyond the activities of the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Varuh človekovih pravic pa s kolegi ni sodeloval zgolj pri dejavnostih Evropske mreže varuhov č lovekovih pravic. Ker je P.