natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Directive 2000/31 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market (Directive on electronic commerce), Directive 2001/29 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, Directive 2004/48 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights, and Directive 2002/58 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) do not require the Member States to lay down an obligation to communicate personal data in order to ensure effective protection of copyright in the context of civil proceedings, in a situation in which a non-profit-making organisation of producers and publishers of musical and audiovisual recordings has brought proceedings seeking an order that a provider of internet access services disclose to the organisation the identities and physical addresses of certain subscribers, so as to enable civil
Direktiva 2000/31 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju), Direktiva 2001/29 o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi, Direktiva 2004/48 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine in Direktiva 2002/58 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij (Direktiva o zasebnem življenju in elektronskih komunikacijah) državam članicam ne nalagajo, naj določijo obveznost sporočanja osebnih podatkov, da bi se zagotovilo učinkovito varstvo avtorske pravice v okviru civilnega sodnega postopka, kadar nepridobitno združenje, ki povezuje producente in založnike glasbenih in avdiovizualnih posnetkov, zahteva, naj se ponudniku internetnega dostopa naloži razkritje imen in naslovov imetnikov določenih krajevnih
PROMUSICAE directives but also make sure that they do not rely on an interpretation of them which would be in conflict with those fundamental rights or with the other general principles of Community law, such as the principle of proportionality.
PROMUSICAE oprejo na tako razlago besedila teh direktiv, ki bi bila v nasprotju s temeljnimi pravicami ali z drugimi splo�nimi načeli prava Skupnosti, kot je načelo sorazmernosti.
However, Community law requires that, when transposing those directives, the Member States take care to rely on an interpretation of them which allows a fair balance to be struck between the various fundamental rights protected by the Community legal order.
Vendar pa pravo Skupnosti od držav članic zahteva, naj bodo ob prenosu zgoraj navedenih direktiv pazljive, da se oprejo na tako razlago teh direktiv, ki omogoča zagotovitev pravilnega ravnovesja med temeljnimi pravicami, varovanimi s pravnim redom Skupnosti.
Further, when implementing the measures transposing those directives, the authorities and courts of the Member States must not only interpret their national law in a manner consistent with those
Ob uporabi ukrepov za prenos teh direktiv morajo organi in sodi�ča držav članic ne zgolj razlagati nacionalno pravo v skladu s temi direktivami, temveč tudi paziti, da se ne
(see paras 60, 70, operative part)
(Glej točki 60, 70 in izrek.)
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL
KOKOTT – ZADEVA C-275/06
However, I shall show below that the provisions of Community law on data protection in the electronic communications sector allow the communication of personal traffic data only to the competent State authorities, but not direct communication to holders of copyrights wishing to bring civil-law actions against the infringement of their rights.
V nadaljevanju pa bom prikazala, da določbe prava Skupnosti o varstvu podatkov pri elektronski komunikaciji dovoljujejo predložitev osebnih podatkov o prometu le pristojnim državnim organom, ne dovoljujejo pa neposredne predložitve imetnikom avtorskih pravic, ki želijo civilnopravno preganjati kr�itev svojih pravic.
This case illustrates that the storage of data for specified purposes creates the desire to use those data more extensively.
Obravnavani primer ponazarja, da shranjevanje podatkov za določene namene zbuja željo, da bi se ti podatki lahko izčrpneje uporabili.
In Spain, providers of access to the Internet are required to store certain data of individual users so that those data can be used, where appropriate, in criminal investigations or for the protection of public security and for national defence.
V Španiji morajo ponudniki internetnih dostopov hraniti nekatere podatke posameznih uporabnikov, da bi se ti po potrebi lahko uporabili v okviru kazenskopravne preiskave ali za za�čito javne varnosti in za nacionalno obrambo.
Now an association of holders of copyrights is seeking to identify, with the aid of those data, users who have infringed copyrights by the exchange of files.
Zdaj pa želi zveza imetnikov avtorskih pravic s pomočjo teh podatkov identificirati uporabnike, ki so z zamenjavo datotek kr�ili avtorske pravice.
The referring court would therefore like to know whether Community law allows or even requires the communication of personal traffic data on the use of the Internet to the holders of intellectual property. It assumes
Zato želi predložitveno sodi�če izvedeti, ali je na podlagi prava Skupnosti imetnikom pravic intelektualne lastnine dovoljeno oziroma celo morajo zahtevati predložitev osebnih podatkov o prometu glede uporabe
In the present case, provisions on the protection of intellectual property and on
V obravnavanem primeru so zanimive določbe o varstvu intelektualne lastnine in
Article 15(2) of Directive 2000/31 states: electronic commerce as well as, in particular, the provisions on data protection are of interest.
Člen 15(2) Direktive 2000/31 določa: elektronskem poslovanju ter zlasti določbe o varstvu podatkov.
The protection of intellectual property in the information society
Varstvo intelektualne lastnine v informacijski družbi
‘Member States may establish obligations for information society service providers promptly to inform the competent public authorities of alleged illegal activities undertaken or information provided by recipients of their service or obligations to communicate to the competent authorities, at their request, information enabling the identification of recipients of their service with whom they have storage agreements.’
„Države članice lahko določijo, da morajo ponudniki storitev informacijske družbe nemudoma obvestiti pristojne organe o domnevnih nezakonitih dejavnostih ali podatkih prejemnikov njihove storitve ali da morajo pristojnim organom na zahtevo sporočiti podatke, na podlagi katerih je možno identificirati prejemnike njihove storitve, s katerimi so sklenili dogovore o shranjevanju.“
With regard to the protection of intellectual property in the information society, Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market 2 must be mentioned first.
V zvezi z varstvom intelektualne lastnine v informacijski družbi je najprej treba navesti Direktivo 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu. 2
Article 18(1) of Directive 2000/31 is worded as follows:
Člen 18(1) Direktive 2000/31 določa:
Article 1(5) of Directive 2000/31 delimits its scope.
Člen 1(5) Direktive 2000/31 določa njeno področje uporabe.
Under Article 1(5)(b), the Directive does not apply to ‘questions relating to information society services covered by Directives 95/46/EC and 97/66/EC’. 3
V skladu s točko (b) se Direktiva ne uporablja za „vpra�anja v zvezi s storitvami informacijske družbe, ki jih zajemata direktivi 95/46/ES in 97/66/ES“. 3
3 — The directives referred to are Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, p.
3 — Gre za Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 281, str.
31) and Directive 97/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the telecommunications sector (OJ 1998 L 24, p. 1).
31) in za Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/66/ES z dne 15. decembra 1997 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju telekomunikacij (UL 1998, L 24, str. 1).
‘Member States shall ensure that court actions available under national law concerning information society services’ activities allow for the rapid adoption of measures, including interim measures, designed to terminate any alleged infringement and to prevent any further impairment of the interests involved.’
„Države članice zagotovijo, da sodno varstvo, ki ga predvideva nacionalno pravo glede dejavnosti storitev informacijske družbe, omogoča hitro sprejetje ukrepov, vključno z začasnimi ukrepi, namenjenimi ustavitvi domnevne kr�itve in preprečitvi nadaljnjega o�kodovanja zadevnih interesov.“
Article 9 of Directive 2001/29 restricts its application as follows:
Člen 9 Direktive 2001/29 omejuje njeno uporabo tako:
Special provisions on the protection of intellectual property in electronic commerce are contained in Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.
Posebna pravila o varstvu intelektualne lastnine pri elektronskem poslovanju vsebuje Direktiva 2001/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2001 o usklajevanju določenih vidikov avtorske in sorodnih pravic v informacijski družbi.
4Article 8 in particular, headed ‘Sanctions and remedies’, is of interest:
4 V njej je zlasti zanimiv člen 8, ki določa sankcije in pravna sredstva:
‘This Directive shall be without prejudice to provisions concerning in particular patent rights, trade marks, design rights, utility models, topographies of semiconductor products, type faces, conditional access, access to cable of broadcasting services, protection of national treasures, legal deposit requirements, laws on restrictive practices and unfair competition, trade secrets, security, confidentiality, data protection and privacy, access to public documents, the law of contract.’
„Ta direktiva ne vpliva na predpise, ki zadevajo zlasti patentne pravice, blagovne znamke, pravice iz modela, patenta s skraj�anim trajanjem, topografijo polprevodni�kih izdelkov, tipov pisav, pogojni dostop, dostop do kabla, za�čito narodnih bogastev, zahteve po pravnem deponiranju, zakone o omejujočem ravnanju in nelojalni konkurenci, trgov- ske skrivnosti, varnost, zaupnost, varstvo podatkov in zasebnost, dostop do javnih dokumentov, pogodbeno pravo.“
Member States shall provide appropriate sanctions and remedies in respect of infringements of the rights and obligations set out in this Directive and shall take all the measures necessary to ensure that those sanctions and remedies are applied.
Države članice predvidijo ustrezne sankcije in pravna sredstva v zvezi s kr�itvami pravic in obveznosti, ki jih določa ta direktiva, in sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se te sankcije in pravna sredstva uporabljajo.
The sanctions thus provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Tak�ne sankcije so učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne.
Article 8 of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights 5 provides for a special right of information for holders of intellectual property:
Posebno pravico do informacij imetnikov pravic intelektualne lastnine določa člen 8 Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/48/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine. 5
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that rightholders whose interests are affected by an infringing activity carried out on its territory can bring an action for damages and/or apply for an injunction and, where appropriate, for the seizure of infringing material as well as of devices, products or components referred to in Article 6(2).
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da lahko imetniki pravic, katerih interesi so prizadeti s kr�itvijo na njenem območju, vložijo od�kodninsko tožbo in/ali zahtevajo sodno odredbo ter, kjer je to potrebno, zaplembo gradiva, ki je predmet kr�itve, pa tudi naprav, izdelkov ali komponent iz člena 6(2).
Member States shall ensure that, in the context of proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right and in response to a justified and proportionate request of the claimant, the
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko v okviru postopkov v zvezi s kr�itvijo pravice intelektualne lastnine in na podlagi utemeljene in sorazmerne zahteve vlagatelja
45; the corrected version published in OJ 2004 L 195, p.
45; uporabljena je bila popravljena različica, ki je bila objavljena v UL L 195, str. 16.
Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply without prejudice to other statutory provisions which: competent judicial authorities may order that information on the origin and distribution networks of the goods or services which infringe an intellectual property right be provided by the infringer and/or any other person who:
Odstavka 1 in 2 se uporabljata brez poseganja v druge zakonske določbe, ki: pristojni sodni organi odredijo, da informacije o izvoru in distribucijskih omrežjih blaga ali storitev, ki kr�ijo pravico intelektualne lastnine, priskrbi kr�itelj in/ali katera koli druga oseba, za katero se ugotovi, da:
(c) was found to be providing on a commercial scale services used in infringing activities;
(e) urejajo varstvo zaupnosti virov informacij ali obdelavo osebnih podatkov.“
(e) govern the protection of confidentiality of information sources or the processing of personal data.’
(c) zagotavlja v komercialnem obsegu storitve, uporabljene v dejavnostih, ki so predmet kr�itve; ali
At the same time, according to Article 2(3), Directive 2004/48 does not affect:
Hkrati v skladu s členom 2(3) Direk -tiva 2004/48 ne vpliva na:
The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall, as appropriate, comprise:
Informacije iz odstavka 1 vključujejo, kot je ustrezno:
(a) the names and addresses of the producers, manufacturers, distributors, suppliers and other previous holders of the goods or services, as well as the intended wholesalers and retailers;
„(a) določbe Skupnosti, ki urejajo materialno pravo intelektualne lastnine, Direktivo 95/46/ES, Direktivo 1999/93/ES ali Direktivo 2000/31/ES na splo�no in zlasti na člene 12 do 15 Direktive 2000/31/ES;
‘(a) the Community provisions governing the substantive law on intellectual property, Directive 95/46/EC, Directive 1999/93/EC or Directive 2000/31/EC, in general, and Articles 12 to 15 of Directive 2000/31/EC in particular;
(a) imena in naslove proizvajalcev, izdelovalcev, distributerjev, dobaviteljev in drugih prej�njih imetnikov blaga ali sto -ritev, kakor tudi predvidenih trgovcev na debelo in na drobno;
The provisions on data protection
Določbe o varstvu podatkov
Article 2(b) of Directive 2002/58 defines the term ‘traffic data’ as ‘any data processed for the purpose of the conveyance of a communication on an electronic communications network or for the billing thereof.’
Člen 2(b) Direktive 2002/58 določa, da gre pri pojmu podatki o prometu za „katere koli podatke, obdelane za namen prenosa sporočila po elektronskem komunikacijskem omrežju ali zaradi zaračunavanja tega sporočila“.
With regard to data protection, Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector 6 is relevant.
Za varstvo podatkov je pomembna Direktiva 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamen- ta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij. 6
Traffic data relating to subscribers and users processed and stored by the provider of a public communications network or publicly available electronic communications service must be erased or made anonymous when it is no longer needed for the purpose of the transmission of a communication without prejudice to paragraphs 2, 3 and 5 of this Article and Article 15(1).
Podatki o prometu, ki se nana�ajo na naročnike in uporabnike in ki jih je ponudnik javnega komunikacijskega omrežja ali javno razpoložljive elektronske komunikacijske storitve obdelal in shranil, morajo biti izbrisani ali predelani v anonimne, potem ko niso več potrebni za namen prenosa sporočila, kar ne vpliva na odstavke 2, 3 in 5 tega člena in člena 15(1).
Under Article 1(2), the provisions of that directive particularise and complement Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data 7for the purposes mentioned in paragraph 1.
V skladu s členom 1(2) določbe te direktive podrobno opredeljujejo in dopolnjujejo Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov 7za namene, navedene v odstavku 1.
Traffic data necessary for the purposes of subscriber billing and interconnection payments may be processed.
Podatki o prometu, potrebni za namene zaračunavanja naročnikom in plačil za medsebojne povezave, se lahko obdelujejo.
PROMUSICAE is permissible only up to the end of the period during which the bill may lawfully be challenged or payment pursued.
PROMUSICAE obdobja, med katerim se lahko obračun zakonito izpodbija ali sprožijo postopki za pridobitev plačila.
3. — 5. … prosecution of criminal offences or of unauthorised use of the electronic communication system, as referred to in Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46/EC.
in pregon kriminalnih dejanj ali nedovoljene uporabe elektronskega komunikacijskega sistema iz člena 13(1) Direktive 95/46/ES.
To this end, Member States may, inter alia, adopt legislative measures providing for the retention of data for a limited period justified on the grounds laid down in this paragraph.
V ta namen lahko države članice med drugim sprejmejo zakonske ukrepe, ki določajo zadrževanje podatkov za določeno obdobje, upravičeno iz razlogov iz tega odstavka.
All the measures referred to in this paragraph shall be in accordance with the general principles of Community law, including those referred to in Article 6(1) and (2) of the Treaty on European Union.’
Vsi ukrepi iz tega odstavka so v skladu s splo�nimi načeli zakonodaje Skupnosti, vključno s tistimi iz člena 6(1) in (2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.“
Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 5 shall apply without prejudice to the possibility for competent bodies to be informed of traffic data in conformity with applicable legislation with a view to settling disputes, in particular interconnection or billing disputes.’
Uporaba odstavkov 1, 2, 3 in 5 ne sme vplivati na možnost, da so pristojni organi seznanjeni s podatki o prometu v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo, in sicer z namenom re�evanja sporov, zlasti sporov v zvezi z medsebojnim povezovanjem ali zaračunavanjem.“
The reservation in Article 15(1), mentioned in Article 6(1) of Directive 2002/58, reads as follows:
V pridržku iz člena 15(1), ki je omenjen v členu 6(1) Direktive 2002/58, je navedena:
‘Member States may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the rights and obligations provided for in Article 5, Article 6, Article 8(1), (2), (3) and (4), and Article 9 of this Directive when such restriction constitutes a necessary, appropriate and proportionate measure within a democratic society to safeguard national security (i.e. State security), defence, public security, and the prevention, investigation, detection and
„Države članice lahko sprejmejo zakonske ukrepe, s katerimi omejijo obseg pravic in obveznosti, določenih v členu 5, členu 6, členu 8(1), (2), (3) in (4) ter členu 9 te direktive, kadar tak�na omejitev pomeni potreben, primeren in ustrezen ukrep znotraj demokratične družbe za za�čito državne varnosti (to je varnosti države), obrambe, javne varnosti in preprečevanje, preiskovanje, odkrivanje
Therefore it does not alter the existing balance between the individual’s right to privacy and the possibility for Member States to take the measures referred to in Article 15(1) of this Directive, necessary for the protection of public security, defence, State security (including the economic wellbeing of the State when the activities relate to State security matters) and the enforcement of criminal law.
Zato ne spreminja obstoječega ravnotežja med posameznikovo pravico do zasebnosti in možnostjo držav članic, da sprejmejo ukrepe iz člena 15(1) te direktive, potrebne za za�čito javne varnosti, obrambe, državne varnosti (vključno z gospodarsko blaginjo države, kadar se dejavnosti nana�ajo na zadeve državne varnosti) in izvajanje kazenske zakonodaje.
Consequently, this Directive does not affect the ability of Member States
Ta direktiva torej ne
Article 13(1) of Directive 95/46, referred to in Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, is worded as follows:
Člen 13(1) Direktive 95/46, na katerega se sklicuje člen 15(1) Direktive 2002/58, določa: vpliva na zmožnost držav članic, da zakonito prestrezajo elektronska sporočila ali da sprejmejo druge ukrepe, če so potrebni iz katerega koli od teh namenov ter v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svobo�čin, kakor jo razlaga Evropsko sodi�če za človekove pravice v svojih sodbah.
Such measures must be appropriate, strictly proportionate to the intended purpose and necessary within a democratic society and should be subject to adequate safeguards in accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.’
Države članice lahko sprejmejo predpise za omejitev obsega obveznosti in pravic, opredeljenih v členih 6(1), 10, 11(1), 12 in 21, kadar taka omejitev predstavlja potrebni ukrep za za�čito:
(a) national security;
(a) državne varnosti;
Article 19 of Directive 2002/58 regulates that directive’s relationship to its predecessor, Directive 97/66:
Člen 19 Direktive 2002/58 ureja njeno razmerje do predhodne Direktive 97/66:
(c) public security;
(c) javne varnosti;
‘Directive 97/66/EC is hereby repealed with effect from the date referred to in Article 17(1).
„Direktiva 97/66/ES se razveljavi z dnem iz člena 17(1).
(d) the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, or of breaches of ethics for regulated professions;
(d) preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja in pregona kaznivih dejanj ali kr�itve etike za zakonsko urejene poklice;
(e) an important economic or financial interest of a Member State or of the European Union, including monetary, budgetary and taxation matters;
(e) pomembnega gospodarskega ali finančnega interesa države članice ali Evropske unije, vključno z denarnimi, proračunskimi in davčnimi zadevami;
References made to the repealed Directive shall be construed as being made to this Directive.’
Sklici na razveljavljeno direktivo se razumejo kot sklici na to direktivo.“
(f) a monitoring, inspection or regulatory function connected, even occasionally, with the exercise of official authority in cases referred to in (c), (d) and (e); generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC 10 is also of interest for the purposes of this case.
(f) spremljanja, pregledovanja ali urejanja, povezanega, četudi občasno, z izvajanjem javne oblasti v primerih iz (c), (d) in (e); bljenih ali obdelanih v zvezi z zagotavljanjem javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ali javnih komunikacijskih omrežij, in spremembi Direktive 2002/58/ES. 10