natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Third, the compensation cannot exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of public service obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging those obligations (Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, paragraph 92, and Servizi Ausiliari Dottori Commercialisti, paragraph 66).
Tretjič, nadomestilo ne sme preseči tega, kar je potrebno za kritje vseh ali dela stro�kov, povzročenih z izvajanjem obveznosti javnih služb, ob upo�tevanju s tem povezanih prihodkov in primernega dobička za izvajanje teh obveznosti (zgoraj navedeni sodbi Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, točka 92, in Servizi Ausiliari Dottori Commercialisti, točka 66).
Fourth, the compensation must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well run and adequately provided with the requisite means so as to be able to meet the necessary public service requirements, would have incurred in discharging those obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging the obligations (Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, paragraph 93, and Servizi Ausiliari Dottori Commercialisti, point 67).
Četrtič, nadomestilo bi moralo biti določeno na podlagi analize stro�kov, ki bi jih povprečno podjetje, dobro upravljano in ustrezno opremljeno s potrebnimi sredstvi, da lahko zadosti zahtevam javnih služb, imelo za izvajanje teh obveznosti, ob upo�tevanju s tem povezanih prihodkov in primernega dobička za izvajanje teh obveznosti (zgoraj navedeni sodbi Altmark Trans in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg, točka 93, in Servizi Ausiliari Dottori Commercialisti, točka 67).
With the aid of those criteria, which may be used, mutatis mutandis, to assess whether the compensation in respect of non-market-compatible costs for which the State is responsible constitutes aid, it is for the national court to ascertain whether, or to what extent, the amount of NLG 400 million may be regarded as compensation for the services provided by the designated company in order to discharge public service obligations or whether that amount was to be used for the purpose of paying non-market-compatible costs of another kind, in which case it would be an economic advantage corresponding to the definition of ‘aid’ within the meaning of Article 87 EC.
Poleg teh meril, ki jih je mogoče mutatis mutandis uporabiti pri presoji tega, ali so nadomestila za s trgom nezdružljive stro�ke, ki jih je povzročila država, pomoč, mora nacionalno sodi�če preveriti, ali oziroma koliko je mogoče znesek 400 milijonov NLG �teti za nadomestilo v zameno za storitve, ki jih je opravila z zakonom določena družba za izvedbo obveznosti javnih služb, oziroma ali bi moral biti ta znesek uporabljen za plačilo s trgom nezdružljivih stro�kov druge vrste, v takem primeru pa bi �lo za gospodarsko korist, ki ustreza pojmu „pomoč“ v smislu člena 87 ES.
In so far as the measure in question gives an advantage to SEP and/or the electricity generating undertakings, such an advantage favours the electricity generating sector and is, therefore, selective in nature.
Ker obravnavani ukrep koristi družbi SEP in/ali podjetjem za proizvodnjo električne energije, daje taka korist prednost sektorju proizvodnje električne energije in je zato selektivna.
It follows from all of those factors that, in so far as they represent an economic advantage, the amounts paid to SEP up to a maximum of NLG 400 million constitute ‘State aid’ for the purposes of Article 87(1) EC.
Iz navedenega izhaja, da so zneski, plačani družbi SEP, do vi�ine 400 milijonov NLG „državna pomoč“ v smislu člena 87(1) ES, ker ti zneski pomenijo gospodarsko korist.
For a tax to be regarded as forming an integral part of an aid measure, it must be hypothecated to the aid measure under the relevant national rules, in the sense that the revenue from the tax is necessarily allocated for the financing of the aid and has a direct impact on the amount of that aid (Streekgewest, paragraph 26, and Distribution Casino France and Others, paragraph 40).
Šteje se, da je dajatev sestavni del ukrepa pomoči, če je v upo�tevni nacionalni zakonodaji med dajatvijo in pomočjo določena obvezna namembnostna vez, tako da so prihodki od dajatve nujno namenjeni financiranju pomoči in neposredno vplivajo na njeno vi�ino (zgoraj navedeni sodbi Streekgewest, točka 26, in Distribution Casino France in drugi, točka 40).
That appears to be true of the case in the main proceedings, subject to the verification referred to in paragraph 86 of this judgment, as concerns the amount of NLG 400 million paid to SEP.
Kaže, da je v postopku v glavni stvari, ob upo�tevanju preverjanja iz točke 86 te sodbe, tako, in sicer v obsegu zneska 400 milijonov NLG, plačanega družbi SEP.
Under Article 88(3) EC, the Commission must be informed, in sufficient time to enable it to submit its comments, of any plans to grant or alter aid.
V skladu s členom 88(3) ES mora biti Komisija obve�čena o načrtih za dodelitev ali spremembo pomoči dovolj zgodaj, da lahko predloži pripombe.
The Member State concerned may not put its proposed measures into effect until any possible review procedure has resulted in a final decision.
Zadevna država članica ne sme izvajati predlaganih ukrepov, dokler v tem postopku ni sprejeta dokončna odločitev.
Where a tax is hypothecated to an aid measure, the notification of the aid must also cover the method of financing (Joined Cases C-261/01 and C-262/01 van Calster and Others [2003] ECR I-12249, paragraph 51, and Streekgewest, paragraph 26).
Kadar je med dajatvijo in pomočjo določena obvezna namembnostna vez, mora biti v obvestilu o ukrepu pomoči naveden tudi način financiranja tega ukrepa (sodba z dne 21. oktobra 2003 v združenih zadevah Van Calster in drugi, C-261/01 in C-262/01, Recueil, str.
The Netherlands Government and the Commission are at variance as regards whether there was a notification for the purposes of Article 88(3) EC.
Nizozemska vlada in Komisija se ne strinjata glede obstoja obvestila v smislu člena 88(3) ES.
It is common ground that, by letter of 30 August 2000, the Netherlands Government made the draft OEPS and the Explanatory Memorandum in respect of it known to the Commission.
Komisija ne izpodbija, da ji je nizozemska vlada z dopisom z dne 30. avgusta 2000 posredovala predlog zakona OEPS in njegovo obrazložitev.
The Commission states, however, that that letter asked it to review the drafts of Ar ticles 6 to 8 of the OEPS under Articles 87 EC and 88 EC, but not the draft of Article 9.
Vendar Komisija poudarja, da je bila s tem dopisom pozvana, da preuči predlog členov od 6 do 8 OEPS glede na člena 87 ES in 88 ES, ne pa predlog člena 9.
In that regard, and without its being necessary to consider whether the letter of 30 August 2000 was sufficiently specific as regards Article 9 of the OEPS to constitute a notification for the purposes of Article 88(3) EC, it need only be stated, as did the Advocate General at points 121 to 123 of his Opinion, that Article 9 of the OEPS entered into force on 29 December 2000, namely before the decision of 25 July 2001 relating to the measures notified on 30 August 2000.
Glede tega zado�ča ugotovitev, in sicer ne da bi bilo treba preučiti, ali je bil dopis z dne 30. avgusta 2000 glede člena 9 OEPS dovolj natančen, da bi pomenil obvestilo v smislu člena 88(3) ES, da je ta člen 9, kot je ugotovil generalni pravobranilec v točkah od 121 do 123 sklepnih predlogov, začel veljati 29. decembra 2000, kar je pred odločbo z dne 25. julija 2001, ki se nana�a na ukrepe, prigla�ene 30. avgusta 2000.
It follows that the obligation not to implement a notified project until a decision has been taken by the Commission was not complied with.
Iz tega izhaja, da obveznost, da se prigla�enega predloga ne sme izvr�iti pred odločitvijo Komisije, ni bila spo�tovana.
It is apparent from those considerations that Article 87 EC must be construed as meaning that the amounts paid to the designated company under Article 9 of the OEPS constitute ‘State aid’ for the purposes of that provision of the Treaty to the
Iz navedenega izhaja, da je treba člen 87 ES razlagati tako, da so zneski, ki so bili plačani z zakonom določeni družbi na podlagi člena 9 OEPS, „državna pomoč“ v smislu te
ESSENT NETWERK NOORD AND OTHERS extent that they represent an economic advantage and not compensation for the services provided by the designated company in order to discharge public service obligations.
ESSENT NETWERK NOORD IN DRUGI določbe Pogodbe, ker pomenijo gospodarsko korist in ne nadomestilo v zameno za storitve, ki jih je opravila z zakonom določena družba za izvedbo obveznosti javnih služb.
The same applies where the national electricity generating undertakings are required to bear those costs and where, by reason of existing agreements, by the payment of a purchase price for electricity produced in the Member
Enako velja takrat, kadar morajo te stroške kriti nacionalna podjetja za proizvodnjo električne energije in kadar je zaradi obstoječih pogodb lahko z zakonom določena družba – s plačilom nabavne cene električne energije,
State, by the payment of dividends to the various domestic electricity generating undertakings of which the designated company is the subsidiary or by any other means, the advantage which that price surcharge constitutes could be passed on in its entirety by the designated company to the domestic electricity generating undertakings.
2008 – ZADEVA C-206/06 proizvedene v državi članici, s plačilom dividend več nacionalnim podjetjem za proizvodnjo električne energije, katerih hčerinska družba je z zakonom določena družba, ali kakor koli drugače – korist, ki jo pomeni doplačilo, v celoti prenesla na nacionalna podjetja za proizvodnjo električne energije.
Article 90 EC is to be construed as meaning that it precludes such a statutory rule where the revenue from the charge levied on the electricity transmitted is used only in part to pay non-market-compatible costs, that is to say where the amount levied by the designated company only partly offsets the burden borne by the national electricity transmitted.
Člen 90 ES je treba razlagati tako, da nasprotuje istemu zakonskemu ukrepu v okoliščinah, v katerih je prihodek od dajatve, obračunane na preneseno električno energijo, le delno namenjen plačilu s trgom nezdružljivih stroškov, to je takrat, kadar se z zneskom, ki ga obračuna z zakonom določena družba, pobota samo del bremena, ki ga nosi prenesena domača električna energija.
Article 87 EC must be construed as meaning that the amounts paid to the designated company under Article 9 of the Transitional Law on the electricity generating sector (Overgangswet Elektriciteitsproductiesector) of 21 December 2000 constitute ‘State aid’ for the purposes of that provision of the EC Treaty in so far as they represent an economic advantage and not compensation for the services provided by the designated company in order to discharge public service obligations.
Člen 87 ES je treba razlagati tako, da so zneski, ki so bili plačani z zakonom določeni družbi na podlagi člena 9 prehodnega zakona o sektorju proizvodnje električne energije z dne 21. decembra 2000 (Overgangswet Elektriciteitsproductiesector), državna pomoč v smislu te določbe Pogodbe, ker pomenijo gospodarsko korist in ne nadomestilo v zameno za storitve, ki jih je opravila z zakonom določena družba za izvedbo obveznosti javnih služb.
Part I — Court of Justice
Del I – Sodišče
Report 2008-7 (A)
Zvezek 2008 – 7 (A)
Catalogue number: QD-AB-08-07A-EN-C
Katalo�ka �tevilka: QD-AB-08-07A-SL-C
Catalogue number (A + B): QD-AB-08-007-EN-C
Katalo�ka �tevilka (A + B): QD-AB-08-007-SL-C
COURTOFJUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
SKUPNOSTI
ISSN 1022-842X Catalogue number: QD-AB-08-07B-EN-CCatalogue number (A + B): QD-AB-08-007-EN-C
ISSN 1830-1851Katalo�ka �tevilka: QD-AB-08-07B-SL-CKatalo�ka �tevilka (A + B): QD-AB-08-007-SL-C
Case C-207/06
Zadeva C-207/06
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat Salzburg-Aigen)
(Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Unabhängiger Finanzsenat Salzburg-Aigen)
(Regulation (EC) No 615/98 — Export refunds — Welfare of live bovine animals during transport — Directive 91/628/EEC — Applicability of the rules relating to the protection of animals during transport — Rules relating to journey times and rest periods and to the transportation of bovine animals by sea to a destination outside of the Community — Feeding and watering of the animals during the journey)
„Uredba (ES) �t. 615/98 – Izvozna nadomestila – Dobro počutje živega goveda med prevozom – Direktiva 91/628/EGS – Uporabljivost pravil o za�čiti živali med prevozom – Pravila o trajanju potovanja in počitkov ter o prevozu goveda po morju do točke namembnega kraja zunaj Skupnosti – Krmljenje in napajanje živali med potovanjem“
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 17 July 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mengozzija, predstavljeni 28. februarja 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Summary of the Judgment
Sodba Sodi�ča (tretji senat) z dne 17. julija 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Commission Regulation No 615/98, Art. 1; Council Directive 91/628, as amended by Directive 95/29, Annex, point 48(7)(b))
(Uredba Komisije št. 615/98, člen 1; Direktiva Sveta 91/628, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29, priloga, točka 48, točka 7(b))
SUMMARY — CASE C-207/06
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-207/06
(Council Directive 91/628, as amended by Directive 95/29, Annex, point 48(7)(a))
(Direktiva Sveta 91/628, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29, priloga, točka 48, točka 7(a))
(Council Directive 91/628, as amended by Directive 95/29, Art. 5A, point 2(d)(ii), first indent)
(Direktiva Sveta 91/628, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29, člen 5(A)(2)(d)(ii), prva alinea)
Article 1 of Regulation No 615/98 laying down specific detailed rules of application for the export refund arrangements as regards the welfare of live bovine animals during transport cannot be interpreted as meaning that point 48(7)(b) of the annex to Directive 91/628 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Direct i- ves 90/425 and 91/496, as amended by Directive 95/29, must be applied to the case of transport by sea on a link between a geographical point of the European Community and a geographical point in a third country by means of vehicles loaded onto vessels without unloading of the animals.
Člena 1 Uredbe �t. 615/98 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema izvoznih nadomestil za dobro počutje živega goveda med prevozom se ne sme razlagati tako, da je treba točko 48, točka 7(b), priloge k Direktivi 91/628 o za�čiti živali med prevozom in o spremembi direktiv 90/425 in 91/496, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29, uporabiti pri prevozu po morju med geografsko točko v Evropski skupnosti in geografsko točko v tretji državi z vozili, ki so bila vkrcana na plovila, ne da bi bile živali iztovorjene.
Point 48(7)(a) of the annex to Dir -ective 91/628 on the protection of ani -mals during transport and amending Directives 90/425 and 91/496, as amended by Directive 95/29, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of transport by sea between a geographi- cal point of the European Community and a geographical point situated in a third country by means of vehicles loaded onto vessels without unloading the animals, the duration of the transport does not have to be taken into account if the animals are transported in accordance with the conditions laid down in point 48(3) and (4) of the annex to Directive 91/628, apart from journey times and rest periods.
Točko 48, točka 7(a), priloge k Direktivi 91/628 o za�čiti živali med prevozom in o spremembi direktiv 90/425 in 91/496, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29, je treba razlagati tako, da se pri prevozu po morju med geografsko točko v Evropski skupnosti in geografsko točko v tretji državi z vozili, ki so bila vkrcana na plovila, ne da bi bile živali iztovorjene, trajanje prevoza ne upo�teva, če se živali prevažajo v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v točkah 3 in 4 te točke 48, razen pogojev glede časa potovanja in časa počitkov.
If that is the case, a further period of transport by road may begin immediately after unloading the lorry at the port of destination in the third country, in accordance with point 48(4)(d).
Če je tako, lahko v skladu s točko 4(d) navedene točke 48 novo obdobje prevoza po cesti začne teči takoj po izkrcanju vozila v pristani�ču tretje države namembnega kraja.
(see para. 35, operative part 2)
(Glej točko 35 in točko 2 izreka.)
Point 48(7)(b) of the annex to Directi -ve 91/628 applies to transport by roll-on/roll-off ferry on a regular and direct link between two geographical points of the Community which must, by definition, be in a position to comply with the conditions set out in that point.
Omenjeno točko 48, točka 7(b), je treba namreč razlagati tako, da se točka 7(b) uporablja za prevoze s trajektom ro-ro na redni in direktni liniji med dvema geografskima točkama v Skupnosti, ki morajo biti po definiciji sposobni izpolnjevati pogoje, določene s to točko.
A route plan containing a pretyped statement indicating that during the
Načrt poti, ki vsebuje navedbo, ki je bila vnaprej vpisana s pisalnim strojem in
(see paras 24, 26, operative part 1)
(Glej točki 24 in 26 ter točko 1 izreka.)
SCHWANINGER of that directive have not been complied with, it is for that authority to assess whether that noncompliance had an effect on the welfare of the animals, whether such noncompliance may, where appropriate, be remedied and whether it must result in the export refund being forfeited, reduced or retained.
SCHWANINGER navedene direktive, mora presoditi, ali je ta kr�itev vplivala na dobro počutje živali, ali se taka kr�itev lahko popravi in ali ta kr�itev povzroči izgubo, zmanj�anje ali ohranitev izvoznega nadomestila.
ferry journey animals are fed and watered ‘in the evenings and mornings, at midday, and in the evenings and mornings’ may satisfy the requirements of Directive 91/628 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425 and 91/496, as amended by Directive 95/29, provided that it is established that the animals were in fact fed and watered as stated.
v skladu s katero so živali nakrmljene in napojene „zvečer, zjutraj, opoldne, zvečer, zjutraj“ med prevozom po morju, lahko izpolnjuje zahteve Direktive 91/628 o za�čiti živali med prevozom in o spremembi direktiv 90/425 in 91/496, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29, če se dokaže, da je bilo to dejansko opravljeno.
If the competent authority considers, in the light of all the documents submitted by the exporter, that the requirements
Če pristojni organ presodi, glede na vse dokumente, ki jih je predložil izvoznik, da niso bile spo�tovane zahteve
(see para. 47, operative part 3)
(Glej točko 47 in točko 3 izreka.)
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERALMENGOZZI delivered on 28 February 2008 1
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI GENERALNEGA PRAVOBRANILCAPAOLA MENGOZZIJA, predstavljeni 28. februarja 2008 1
5A point 2(d)(ii) of the directive and in particular whether a pretyped statement indicating the care to be given to the animals on the ferry is sufficient for that purpose.
Predložitveno sodi�če s tem predlogom za sprejetje predhodne odločbe v bistvu prosi tveno sodi�če se spra�uje, kako je treba izpolniti načrt poti iz člena 5(A)(2)(d) Direktive in zlasti ali v ta namen zadostuje predhodno natipkan vpis, v katerem je navedena oskrba, ki jo je treba nuditi živalim na trajektu.
No 805/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal, 4as amended by Regulation No 2634/97, 5 virtue of the reference made by Regulation No 615/98 2 to Directive 91/628, 3 the specific provision in Chapter VII 48 point 7(b) of the annex to that directive which applies to the transport of animals by ferry on a link between two points of the Community applies analogously in the case of transport of animals by ‘roll-on/roll-off’ ferry to a third State and how that provision is to be interpreted with particular reference to whether or not provision must be made for an interval of rest after 14 hours of transport by sea.
615/98 2na Direktivo 91/628 3pri prevozu živali na trajektih ro-ro v tretjo državo uporabljajo po analogiji posebne določbe iz točke 48(7)(b) Poglavja VII Priloge k omenjeni direktivi za prevoz živali na trajektih, ki povezujejo dve točki Skupnosti, in kako je treba razlagati to določbo, zlasti glede na potrebo po zagotovitvi postanka po �tirinajstih urah prevoza po morju.
If the answer to the first question is in the negative, the Court is also asked to determine whether, under Chapter VII 48 point 7(a) of the annex to the directive, a further 29 hours of transport by road may begin after the transport by sea without providing for the animals to be unloaded and rested for at least 24 hours first.
Če je odgovor na prvo vpra�anje nikalen, poleg tega prosi Sodi�če, naj pojasni, ali je v skladu s točko 48(7)(a) Poglavja VII Priloge k Direktivi po prevozu po morju mogoče začeti nadaljnji 29-urni cestni prevoz, ne da bi bilo treba predhodno poskrbeti za izkrcanje in najmanj 24-urni počitek živali. Nazadnje, predloži-
Lastly, the national court wonders about the detailed rules for drawing up the route plan referred to in Article
805/68 z dne 27. junija 1968 o skupni ureditvi trga za goveje in telečje meso 4, kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo �t. 2634/97 5, je izplačilo
the payment of the refund for exports of live animals is to be subject to compliance with the provisions established in Community legislation concerning animal welfare and, in particular, the protection of animals during transport.
nadomestil za izvoz živih živali pogojeno s spo�tovanjem skupnostne zakonodaje v zvezi z dobrim počutjem živali, zlasti določb o za�čiti živali med prevozom.
2 — Commission Regulation (EC) No 615/98 of 18 March 1998 laying down specific detailed rules of application for the export refund arrangements as regards the welfare of live bovine animals during transport (OJ 1998 L 82, p. 19).
2 – Uredba Komisije (ES) �t. 615/98 z dne 18. marca 1998 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo sistema izvoznih nadomestil za dobro počutje živega goveda med prevozom (UL L 82, str. 19).
5 — Council Regulation (EC) No 2634/97 of 18 December 1997 amending Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (OJ 1997 L 356, p. 13).
5 – Uredba Sveta (ES) z dne 18. decembra 1997 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) �t. 805/68 o skupni ureditvi trga za goveje in telečje meso (UL L 356, str. 13).
3 — Council Directive 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Dir -ectives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC (OJ 1991 L 340, p.
3 – Direktiva Sveta 91/628/EGS z dne 19. novembra 1991 o za�čiti živali med prevozom in o spremembi direktiv 90/425/EGS in 91/496/EGS (UL L 340, str.
17), as amended by Council Directive 95/29/EC of 29 June 1995 (OJ 1995 L 148, p. 52).
17), kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 95/29/ES z dne 29. junija 1995 (UL L 148, str. 52,). To direktivo je razveljavila Uredba Sveta (ES) �t.
However, Article 33 of that regulation provides that the directive is to be repealed only from 5 January 2007.
Vendar je v členu 33 te uredbe predvidena njena razveljavitev s 5. januarjem 2007.
SCHWANINGER contained in the second subparagraph of the aforesaid Article 13(9) word for word.
SCHWANINGER so dobesedno navedene določbe člena 13(9), drugi pododstavek.
It should be noted that for the purposes of the directive ‘transport’ means any move -ment of animals, effected by a means of transport, which involves loading and unloading the animals, and ‘rest period’ means a continuous period in the course of a journey during which animals are not being moved by a means of transport.
Spomniti je treba, da je „prevoz“ v Direktivi opredeljen kot vsako gibanje živali, ki se izvr�i s prevoznim sredstvom ter vključuje natovarjanje in raztovarjanje živali, in da je „čas počitka“ neprekinjen čas med potjo, ko se živali ne prevažajo s prevoznim sredstvom.