natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For the first time, a call for proposals ongender researchwill lead to funding of research in this area (up to 5 Mio EURO). Furthermore, Ambassadors will be nominated to raise awarenesson the women and science issue.As for the activities developed by the Enwise countries themselves, itshould be underlined that two Enwise workshops, one on Young Scien- tists12that took place in Prague on 25 April 2003 and one on Starting adebate with women scientists from the Balkan region13that took place in
Prvič v zgodovini bodo k predložitviprošenj po finančnih sredstvih vabljeni projekti, ki bodo raziskovali odnosemed spoloma(zagotovljenih je do 5 milijonov eurov finančnih sredstev).Imenovani pa bodo tudi ambasadorji, ki bodo ljudi ozaveščali o vprašanjužensk in znanosti.Glede dejavnosti, pripravljenih v državah Enwise, lahko povemo, da sta bilidelavnici Enwise, in sicer delavnica na temo Mladih znanstvenikov12, ki jepotekala v Pragi 25. aprila 2003, in delavnica z naslovom Začetek razprave
Brussels on 11-12 November 2003 were funded under the 2003 Scienceand Society FP6 budget.
13, ki je potekala v Bruslju 11. in 12. novembra zbalkanskimi znanstvenicami
Two other important Enwise activities were introduced as proposals in response to the 2003 Science and Society open calland were successfully evaluated: the workshop Debating bioethical issues with women scientists from the Enwise countries14that took place in Budapest on 23 October 2003 and an ambitious project15co-ordinated by
2003, financirani iz proračuna za Znanost in družbo 2003 znotraj 6. okvirnegaprograma. Med dejavnostmi, s katerimi so se države Enwise odzvale na razpis2003 programa Znanost in družba, sta naslednja uspešno ocenjena projekta:
Lists of respective delegates to befound in Annexes 10 & 11.12. See report on this workshop at theend of the present Chapter. 13. See report on this workshop at theend of the present Chapter.14. See report on this workshop at theend of this Chapter.15. Still under negotiation, whenfinalising this report. the Czech National Contact Centre - Women and science to expand theiractivities to the neighbouring countries with partners in Hungary, the Slovak Republic and Slovenia.
kontaktnem centru, s partnerji na Madžarskem, v Slovaški republiki in Sloveniji,znotraj katerega se bodo dejavnosti širile na sosednje države.
An original initiative for women in science in the Czech Republic biases in science, research institutions andscientific theories, contributing to develop feministepistemologies.
Izvirna pobuda s področja žensk in znanosti v Češki republiki spolov, obstoječih spolnih predsodkov v znanosti,pri raziskovalnih ustanovah in znotraj znanstvenihteorij ter tako prispevati k feminističniepistemologiji.
The Centre strives to developnetworking among women scientists in the Czech Republic and abroad.
Center se trudi razviti mrežoznanstvenic v Češki republiki in v tujini.Vtanamen tudi vzdržuje podatkovno bazostrokovnjakinj.
It runs a database of expertsfor this purpose.
Doslej je razvil večje številoprojektov, s katerimi želi povečati zastopanostinopaznost žensk v znanosti.
It has developed a number ofprojects to increase the participation and visibilityof women in science, and in 2003 launched aproject addressed to young scientists.
Leta 2003 je začels projektom o mladih znanstvenikih.
The Centrehas also the aim at developing contacts and cooperative projects with similar institutions abroad,and provides information services on genderissues in FP6.
Center si jekot cilj zastavil tudi razvijanje stikov in skupnihprojektov s podobnimi institucijami v tujini, znotraj6. okvirnega programa pa deluje kot informacijskicenter za vprašanja, vezana na politiko dpspolov.
In the coming years, with the end of FP6 and more importantly with thenext FP, a crucial momentum could be achieved, by reaching a criticalmass of activities to support stronger women and science dynamics in allthe Enwise countries and in the Balkans.
V naslednjih letih, ko se bo zaključil 6. okvirni program, še posebej pa, ko sebo začel naslednji okvirni program, bo nastopil odločilen trenutek. Oblikovalase bo kritična masa dejavnosti, ki bodo podpirale močne ženske in znanstvenodinamiko v državah Enwise in na Balkanu.
Obviously, only additional funding can make this momentum decisive and sustainable.
Seveda bi dodatna finančna sredstvaomogočila, da bi bil doseženi vpliv večji in bolj trajnostni.
Concluding remarks – Limiting factors Although everything seems to be formally in place to allow women scientists to participate in greater numbers and more fully in FP6, the membersof the Enwise Expert Group underlined some obstacles that could hindertheir full participation.
Sklepna opažanja – Dejavniki omejevanja Čeprav vse kaže, da je formalno vse zagotovljeno, da bi lahko znanstvenicev večjem številu in aktivneje sodelovale v 6. okvirnem programu, članicestrokovne skupine Enwise poudarjajo, da obstajajo ovire, ki bi lahko preprečilenjihovo polno zastopanost.
Indeed, the dissemination and sharing of FP6information and a broader diffusion of FP6 funding, which would be thepre-requisite for structuring the scientific research in all the Enwise countries and enable them to become full partners of ERA, are still problematic.
Širjenje in izmenjava informacij o 6. okvirnemprogramu ter obveščanje o financiranju znotraj 6. okvirnega programa, ki sopredpogoji za strukturiranje znanstvenih raziskav v državah Enwise in ki biomogočile, da države Enwise postanejo polnopravne partnerke v Evropskemraziskovalnem prostoru, ostajajo še nadalje problematične.
From the facts and findings presented in this Chapter, some limitingfactorsto this full participation, in particular to that of women scientistsfrom the Enwise countries, are listed below:
Na podlagi dejstevin ugotovitev, opisanih v pričujočem poglavju, lahko predstavimo nekajdejavnikov, ki omejujejopolno zastopanost znanstvenic iz držav Enwise.
See also Chapter 3, where the genderpay gap is further addressed.
Glej tretje poglavje, v katerem sestrokovnjakinje bolj poglobijo v obstoječerazlike v osebnih dohodkih.
pi Acting as a FP expert in Brussels: an expensive activity…While the scientific interest of acting as an expert in any of the FP panelscannot be denied, actual participation of Enwise experts, in particular forwomen16, in the different FP6 evaluation and monitoring activities can bedramatically restricted because they lack the necessary financial resources.Since the Commission’s rules are that travel and accommodation/subsistence expenses will, in principle, be paid after the meeting has taken place,each of the invited experts to any of the FP6 activities in Brussels needsabout 800 to 900 Euro in order to be able to afford to take part in panelmeeting and to carry out the assigned duties.
vodborih znotraj okvirnega programa, veliko, vendar pa lahko ostane dejanskosodelovanje strokovnjakov, in še posebej strokovnjakinj16, iz držav Enwiseznotraj raznih dejavnosti vrednotenja in ocenjevanja ter spremljanja znotraj6. okvirnega programa še nadalje močno okrnjeno zaradi pomanjkanja potrebnihfinančnih sredstev. Ker se v skladu s pravili Evropske komisije potni stroški,stroški namestitve in dnevnice načeloma plačujejo po končanem srečanju,potrebujejo vabljeni strokovnjaki za udeležbo na dejavnostih, vezanih na6.okvirni program, ki potekajo v Bruslju, med 800 in 900 euri, da se lahkoudeležijo sestanka odbora ali da lahko opravijo naložene dolžnosti.
Costs of a typical 2-day scientific meeting in Brussels
Stroški tipičnega dvodnevnega znanstvenega srečanja v Bruslju dvodnevno znanstveno srečanje v Bruslju
Travel within Brussels(since low cost hotels are not in the EC area):
20 euro 860 euro približna vrednost standardne povratnevozovnice*, ki vključuje sobotni postanek:standardni strošek hotelske nastanitvevcenejšem hotelu, 4 nočitve po 80 euro :obroki x 4 dni po 30 euro na dangibanje po Bruslju (cenejši hoteli niso v evropskih četrteh)skupaj:
Glover, 2003.*Calculated on basis of costing the cheapest flightsfrom 5 Enwise capital cities to Brussels, using prices from www.expedia.com, August 21 2003, as follows:Warsaw (K291), Riga (K630), Vilnius (K344),Bucharest (K331) and Bratislava (K299).
Tipično dvodnevno srečanje strokovnjakov v Bruslju ponavadi poteka ob četrtkih in petkih.Znanstveniki ponavadi odpotujejo v Bruseljvsredo, ker se četrtkovo srečanje začne v dokajzgodnjih dopoldanskih urah.
To set the scene, let us first set out one componentof a typical two-day expert meeting in Brussels,often on a Thursday and Friday.
Da so upravičeni docenejše letalske vozovnice, ki v njihovo odsotnostprištejejo nočitev na soboto, se vračajo domovvnedeljo.
Scientists will travelto Brussels on Wednesday, since the meeting willstart quite early on the Thursday morning and, inorder to take advantage of lower airfares if theyinclude a Saturday night in their trip, will travel backto their countries on Sunday.
To pomeni, da so odsotni štiri dni, karprinese dodatne stroške za prehrano in spanje.Evropska komisija plačuje nastale stroškenaknadno, ne vnaprej.
This means that 4days’ worth of subsistence – the cost of meals andhotel rooms – will be payable retrospectively by the European Commission.
Za udeležbo na takšnevrste srečanjih – ponavadi so letno organizirana3ali 4 tovrstna srečanja – bo znanstvenik – aliustanova, pri kateri dela – verjetno moralporavnati naslednje stroške: vir: Glover, 2003Opomba: * Obračunano na podlagi cen najcenejših letov iz5prestolnic držav Enwise v Bruselj. Uporabljen je bilcenik www.expedia.comz dne 21. 8. 2003, kot sledi:Varšava (291 euro), Riga (630 euro), Vilnius (344euro),Bukarešta (331 euro in Bratislava (299euro).
FP5 good practice forexperts- evaluators fromthe Enwise countries
Praviloma v državah Enwise ni finančnih sredstev17, namenjenih kritju potnihin hotelskih stroškov vabljenih nacionalnih strokovnjakov.
As a rule, the Enwise countries do not have special funds17to cover thetravel and accommodation expenses of their national invited experts.
To pomeni, damorajo strokovnjaki sami kriti stroške, vezane na strokovno delovanje znotraj6. okvirnega programa.
Itmeans that s/he has to cover all expenses related to her/his FP6 expertactivity her/himself. If one compares the price of an Apex airplane ticketto and back from Brussels with the average monthly salary in the respec-
Če primerjamo cene najugodnejših letalskih vozovnicmed posameznimi državami Enwise in Brusljem s povprečnim mesečnim osebnim dohodkom v teh državah18
, it becomes obvious why several invited Enwise experts have not been able to accept invitations to actually act as FPexperts.
, postane očitno, zakaj si več vabljenih strokovnjakov iz držav Enwise ne more privoščiti, da bi sprejeli vabilo indejansko sodelovali kot strokovnjaki znotraj 6. okvirnega programa.
pi FP6 on Internet: a discriminating factor?De facto, all FP6 information is accessible only via the Internet.
Vsi podatki o 6. okvirnem programu so objavljeni na medmrežju.
If themembers of the Enwise Expert Group have not reported on any specificgender discrimination in their countries, regarding access to the Internetor the availability of PC, many of them underlined the need for moremod-
Članicestrokovne skupine Enwise sicer niso poročale o takšni obliki spolnediskriminacije v državah Enwise, ki bi vplivala na dostop do medmrežja alimožnost uporabe osebnega računalnika, poudarile pa so potrebo po večjem številu visokozmogljivih računalnikov.
ern and high quality computers. These IT difficulties were also met by themembers of the Enwise Group themselves, since some of them have access to a PC in their institution only on a part-time basis, some have PCs,which cannot accept Word documents, but only Rich Text Format, othersworking with a home PC use an Internet web service that does not allowthe receipt of large documents.
S težavami na področju informacijsketehnologije so se srečevale tudi članice strokovne skupine Enwise, od katerih imajo nekatere dostop do računalnika na domači ustanovi le nekaj ur na dan,druge imajo osebne računalnike, ki sicer sprejmejo dokumente, pripravljenev urejevalniku besedil Word, a le, če so v formatu Rich Text Format, spetdruge delajo na domačem osebnem računalniku in uporabljajo medmrežnestoritve, ki ne omogočajo prejemanja obsežnih datotek.
Additionally recurrent interruptions of Internet accesses with these countries were recorded.
Poleg vsega navedenegapa so v teh državah povezave s strežnikom večkrat prekinjene.
pi Scissors diagram To some extent, the existing gender distribution of male and femaleexperts from the Enwise countries between the CREST, Programme Committees and/or the AGs, on the one hand, and the NCPs on the other,reflects the famous scissors diagram used in the Helsinki Group report(European Commission, 2002) to highlight the vertical segregation facingwomen in scientific careers across Europe.
Obstoječa razporeditev strokovnjakov in strokovnjakinj iz držav Enwise medodborom CREST, programskimi odbori in svetovalnimi skupinami na enistrani ter nacionalnimi kontaktnimi osebami ali nacionalnimi kontaktnimitočkami na drugi strani do neke mere odraža znani škarjasti diagram, ki ga jev svojem poročilu uporabila helsinška skupina (Evropska komisija, 2000), dabi poudarila vertikalno segregacijo, s katero se soočajo ženske v znanosti povsej Evropi.
As shown in Figures 4.1and4.2(for FP5) and 4.3and4.4(for FP6), the numbers of women expertsdeclines at the decision-making level (i.e. CREST, Programme Committeeor AG), whereas at the more technical level (i.e. NCP), involving advice,support activities and dissemination of information, the involvement ofwomen reaches the same level as that of men and may even be greater.
Kot je razvidno iz diagramov 4.1in 4.2(za 5. okvirni program)ter 4.3in 4.4(za 6. okvirni program), je število strokovnjakinj manjše na ravni,kjer se sprejemajo odločitve (v odboru CREST, programskih odborih insvetovalnih skupinah), medtem ko so raziskovalke bolje soudeležene na boljtehnični ravni (v nacionalnih kontaktnih točkah ali kot nacionalne kontaktneosebe), kjer svetujejo, podpirajo dejavnosti in širijo informacije.
Additionally, one should stress that the under-representation of womenfrom Enwise countries in advisory roles is not consistent with the aims andobjectives of FP6, where a stronger gender dimension has been includedat all stages.
Na tej ravnije žensk približno toliko kot moških ali celo več. Poudariti je treba, da premajhna zastopanost žensk iz držav Enwise v svetovalnihvlogah ni v skladu s cilji 6. okvirnega programa, znotraj katerega naj bi sezastopanost obeh spolov povečala na vseh ravneh.
If this under-representation was to continue as a rule, it couldcreate a real problem for achieving the aim of promoting women scientists’ role and place in the European Research Area.
Če bi se v prihodnostiizkazalo, da je premajhna zastopanost postala pravilo, bomo le stežkauresničevali cilj, ki smo si ga zadali, in sicer da spodbujamo vlogo in mestoznanstvenic v Evropskem raziskovalnem prostoru.
In 2000, the Latvian Ministry of Education and Science established aspecial funding to cover the travel andaccommodation expenses met by theobservers and experts in FP Programme Committees.
Leta 2000 je latvijsko Ministrstvo zašolstvo in znanost uvedlo posebna finančnasredstva, s katerimi krije potne innastanitvene stroške opazovalcev instrokovnjakov v programskih odborihznotraj okvirnih programov.
See also Chapter 3, for furtherinput on average salaries.
Glej tretje poglavje, v katerem sopovprečni osebni dohodki podrobnejeopredeljeni.
pi Multiple appointments and adequate human resources In some Enwise countries, only a restricted group of experts was in chargeof representing their countries in the various FP5 bodies.
Nekatere države Enwise je v različnih telesih znotraj 5. okvirnega programazastopala le številčno omejena skupina strokovnjakov.
They usuallyheld more than one position and thus played several roles in this context.It was also the case, and still is, that several observers were/are nominatedfor two or more of the FP sub-programme committees.
Ti so bili ponavadi naveč položajih, tako da so odigrali več vlog. Dogajalo se je (in dogaja se), daje bilo več opazovalcev imenovanih v dva podprogramska odbora ali več.
Besides the factthat it is questionable whether one person can perform all these variousduties efficiently, conflicts of interests could also arise, notably where the
Nele da je vprašljivo, ali lahko ena sama oseba zares učinkovito opravlja toliko
kg407785_096 5/07/04 10:12 Page 113 same person acts as Programme Committee member and/or NCP and/or AG member.
ph605336_096 8/09/06 11:13 Page 113 različnih nalog, nastane lahko tudi konflikt interesov, še posebej, če ena in istaoseba sočasno deluje kot član programskega odbora oziroma nacionalnakontaktna oseba oziroma član svetovalne skupine.
Indeed, whereas Programme Committee members arebound by confidentiality and cannot disclose the information communicated to them by the Commission, NCPs are not subject to any confidentiality clauses and their task is quite the opposite – to disseminate information about FP activities as widely as possible.
Tako se morajo na primerčlani programskih odborov držati načela zaupnosti in ne smejo razkritiinformacij, ki jim jih posreduje Evropska komisija, medtem ko načelo zaupnostine velja za nacionalne kontaktne osebe.
The most critical situation in this context can be found in those countries, where the doubleappointment (NCP acting as FP6 Programme Committee observer) is stillthe rule.
Nasprotno, naloga le-teh je, da, kolikorle morejo, širijo informacije o dejavnostih, ki potekajo znotraj 6. okvirnegaprograma v državah, kjer dvojno imenovanje (nacionalna kontaktna oseba, kiistočasno deluje kot opazovalec v programskem odboru znotraj 6. okvirnegaprograma) še naprej ostaja pravilo.
pi Enlarging the circles of those who are in the know…Generally speaking, the experience of serving as a FP expert evaluatorgives any researcher an opportunity to increase his/her knowledge onwhat is assessed at EU level as being a good European research projectand thus on how to participate in the FP activities.
Na splošno lahko trdimo, da raziskovalci, ki si pridobijo izkušnje kot strokovniocenjevalci znotraj okvirnih programov, veliko izvedo, kaj na evropski ravnivelja za dober evropski raziskovalni projekt.
There is no systematicmonitoring at national level of whom, among the experts from the Enwisecountries registered in DG Research databases (Exsis or EMM), served orwill serve as an expert evaluator.
Tako si pridobijo znanje o tem,kako lahko v prihodnosti sodelujejo pri dejavnostih znotraj okvirnih programov.Na nacionalni ravni ni vzpostavljenega načina, s katerim bi sistematičnospremljali, kateri strokovnjaki iz držav Enwise, ki so vključeni v podatkovnebaze Generalnega direktorata za raziskave (Exsis ali EMM), so že sodelovaliali bodo sodelovali kot strokovni ocenjevalci.
This means that the scientific communities of these countries cannot fully benefit from the feedback of thosenationals who have actually participated in FP evaluations.It was mentioned that, in none of the Enwise countries, was there – or isthere – any information available at national level on the experts fromthese countries who were – and are – invited to participate in both the FP5Monitoring Panels and EAGs, as well as in the FP6 AGs.
To pomeni, da se znanstvenikiv posameznih državah ne morejo naučiti na podlagi povratne informacije, kibi jim jo podali tisti strokovnjaki, ki so že dejavno sodelovali v postopkihvrednotenja in ocenjevanja znotraj okvirnih programov.
This can becounterproductive for the scientific communities of the Enwise countries,where better synergies and efficient co-ordination of all FP actors stillneed to be reached, if a structuring effect is the ultimate aim to bereached.
Omenile smo tudi, da v državah Enwise na nacionalni ravni ne zbirajo podatkovo strokovnjakih, ki so bili ali so vabljeni k sodelovanju v nadzornih in ocenjevalnihsvetih znotraj 5. okvirnega programa, v zunanjih svetovalnih skupinah znotraj5. okvirnega programa in v svetovalnih skupinah znotraj 6.okvirnega programa.Takšno ravnanje lahko privede do neželenih učinkov, saj moramo v državah Enwise oblikovati boljše sinergije in zagotoviti učinkovito usklajevanje delovanjavseh akterjev znotraj okvirnih programov, če želimo doseči končni cilj invzpostaviti učinkovito znanstveno in raziskovalsko strukturo.
Among the indicative list of recommendedcapacities that FP6 NCPs should fulfil to carry outtheir recommended tasks are specifically mentionedthe following: “Have adequate human resourcesand equipment (e.g. informatics); be able to act asindependent organisation(s), being committed toimpartiality in delivering their services.”
Nacionalne kontaktne točke znotraj 6. okvirnegaprograma bi morale biti poleg drugih priporočenihzmogljivosti zmožne opravljati naslednje naloge:"imeti ustrezne človeške vire in opremo (npr.informatiko); biti zmožne delovati kot neodvisnaorganizacija, biti zavezane k nepristranskosti priopravljanju storitev." vir: Smernice za vzpostavljanje sistemov nacionalnih kontaktnihtočk znotraj 6. okvirnega programa – Evropska komisija –Generalni direktorat za raziskave
It is in the interest of the Commission, as well as ofthe wider research community, that members of Advisory Groups are not in a position to take undueadvantage of or exercise undue influence on theimplementation of FP6.
V interesu Evropske komisije in širšeraziskovalne skupnosti je, da se člani svetovalnihskupin ne znajdejo v položaju, ko bi se lahkookoristili s svojim delom oziroma bi lahko vplivalina izvajanje 6. okvirnega programa.
To this end, it is agreed thatmembers of Advisory Groups may not be involved inany way in the evaluation or selection of proposalsfor Community funding under FP6.
Zato smosklenili, da člani svetovalskih skupin nikakor nesmejo sodelovati pri ocenjevanju in vrednotenjuoziroma pri izbiri projektov, pri katerih se znotraj6. okvirnega programa zaproša za sredstva Evropske unije.
Therefore,members of the Advisory Groups:- may not be members of the Programme Committees or called as experts before the Programme Committees; - may not act as evaluators of proposals submittedunder FP6;- may participate in consortia under FP6, either intheir personal capacity or as representative of theorganisations to which they belong.
Člani svetovalnih skupin zatorej:– ne smejo biti člani programskih odborovoziroma ne smejo biti pozvani pred programskiodbor kot strokovnjaki; – ne smejo delovati kot ocenjevalci predlaganihprojektov, predloženih znotraj 6. okvirnegaprograma;– smejo sodelovati v konzorcijih znotraj6.okvirnega programa bodisi kot posameznikibodisi kot predstavniki organizacij, ki jimpripadajo.
Source: European Commission- DG Research, 2003.
vir: Evropska komisija – Generalni direktorat za raziskave, 2003
Enwise workshop
Delavnica Enwise
Young Scientists
Mladi znanstveniki
25 April, 2003 - Prague, the Czech Republic pi“In many fields women arenot taken seriously, particularly ata younger age.”
25. april 2003 – Praga, Češka republika
Female, age: 25, economicand management sciences, Hungary.
"Na številnih področjih žensk,še posebej mlajših žensk, nejemljejo resno." znanstvenica, starost: 25, ekonomskevede in menedžment, Madžarska
pi“The responsibility for thehousehold and the childcare isstill considered to be a women’saffair – women have manyproblems with conciliating theirscientific carriers and family.”
"Še vedno prevladuje mnenje,da je skrb za gospodinjstvo inotroke ženska stvar – ženskese soočajo s številnimitežavami, ko poskušajouskladiti znanstveno kariero indružino." znanstvenica, starost: 26, družbene vede,Češka republika ved začeli imenovati kar beg iz znanosti (eksodus), pa vse tjado ugleda, ki ga prinese kariera znanstvenika, in privlačnostiznanstvene poklicne poti v očeh mladih, o kateri se v Evropskiuniji veliko razpravlja prav v kontekstu cilja barcelonskih
Female, age: 26, social sciences,the Czech Republic.
3odstotkov1, ter vprašanja enakosti spolov v razvojni inraziskovalni dejavnosti.