natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
French judicial authorities requested a coordination meeting, in the context of a Europol AWF, in a VAT carousel fraud case involving France, Spain, Belgium and Germany.
Francoski pravosodni organi so v okviru Europolovega analitičnega delovnega akta zaprosili za koordinacijsko srečanje v primeru goljufije vrste davčni vrtiljak v zvezi z utajo DDV-ja, v katerega so bile vpletene Francija, Španija, belgija in Nemčija.
A French company was selling second-hand cars bought in Belgium, Germany and Spain since 2007.
Francoska družba je prodajala rabljene avtomobile, kupljene v belgiji, Nemčiji in Španiji od leta 2007 naprej.
Due to the creation of fictitious Spanish companies and the use of forged documents, the VAT was only paid on the profit, with a VAT loss estimated at more than €1.5 million.
Ker so bile ustanovljene navidezne španske družbe in uporabljeni ponarejeni dokumenti, je bil DDV plačan le na dobiček, ocenjena davčna izguba pa je presegala 1,5 milijona evrov.
The coordination meeting allowed the exchange of information and the preparation of five letters rogatory, leading to simultaneous arrests and searches in three of the Member States in September 2009.
Koordinacijsko srečanje je omogočilo izmenjavo informacij in pripravo petih zaprosil za medsebojno pravno pomoč, kar je septembra 2009 privedlo do sočasnih aretacij in preiskav v treh državah članicah.
In a case of child abuse images, a suspect, using an IP address in Spain, allegedly enticed Estonian teenagers to submit pornographic pictures of themselves.
V primeru zlorabe fotografij otrok je osumljenec z naslova IP v Španiji domnevno privabljal estonske najstnike, da pošljejo svoje pornografske fotografije. Med prvimi stiki z žrtvami se je španski osumljenec pretvarjal, da je najstnik.
The victims were later forced to submit more pictures, under threat of publication of the victims’ photographs on Facebook by the suspect.
Pozneje je silil žrtve, naj pošljejo še več fotografij, ker je grozil, da bo objavil njihove fotografije na Fa-cebooku.
The Prosecution Service of Estonia sent an MlA request to Spain, asking for a house search.
Služba kazenskega pregona v Estoniji je poslala Španiji zaprosilo za medsebojno pravno pomoč zaradi izvedbe hišne preiskave.
Eurojust’s assistance was requested to accelerate its execution.
Eurojust je bil zaprošen za pomoč pri hitrejši izvršitvi.
At a coordination meeting, Eurojust also solved a conflict of jurisdiction with the use of formal article 6 powers in determining that Spain was in a better position to prosecute, because the suspect was Spanish, and the crime was committed in/from Spain; and, in the interest of protecting the young victims from media attention, Spain was considered a safer venue for the trial.
Na koordinacijskem srečanju je Eurojust prav tako rešil spor o pristojnosti z uporabo formalnih pooblastil iz člena 6 in odločil, da ima Španija boljše izhodišče za kazenski pregon, ker je bil osumljenec Španec in ker je bilo kaznivo dejanje storjeno v/iz Španije; poleg tega se je štelo, da je v interesu varovanja mladih žrtev pred medijsko izpostavljenostjo Španija varnejši kraj za sodno obravnavo.
24 authorities of the EU Member States competent for investigating and prosecuting VAT fraud; and assisted to co-ordinate multilateral searches, and to clarify MlA requirements in the different states so as to ensure proper and timely execution, particularly in respect of the seizure of computer data, where evidential requirements differed. Seven persons were arrested in the operation.
24 informacij tožilskim in pravosodnim organom na nacionalni ravni;
Boiler room frauds where investors in one Member State are targeted by criminals based in another Member State cause particular problems to investigators and prosecutors.
Investicijske goljufije (boiler room frauds) oziroma primeri, ko so investitorji iz ene države članice tarča storilcev iz druge države članice, povzročajo posebne težave preiskovalcem in tožilcem.
In a case that involved Spain, Malta, Slovakia, Austria, Cyprus, Switzerland, Ireland, and the UK, investors had been defrauded of some £28 million sterling. Eurojust
V primeru, v katerega so bile vpletene Španija, Malta, Slovaška, Avstrija, Ciper, Švica, Irska in Združeno kraljestvo, so bili investitorji ogoljufani za približno 28 milijo- nov angleških funtov.
• to clarify the roles and competences of the European units and bodies competent in the fight against VAT fraud.
• pojasniti vloge in pristojnosti evropskih enot in organov, pristojnih za boj proti utaji DDV-ja.
• to launch a questionnaire with a view to seeking solutions to the main obstacles and difficulties already identified;
• analizirati glavne ovire in težave pri koordinaciji čezmejnih preiskav utaje DDV-ja na podlagi obstoječih poročil, praktičnih izkušenj in razpoložljivih informacij;
Against this background, Eurojust has taken the lead in facilitating cooperation between judicial authorities in cases of transnational VAT fraud.
Zato je Eurojust prevzel glavno vlogo pri omogočanju sodelovanja med pravosodnimi organi v primerih čezmejnih utaj DDV-ja.
This year, for the first time, corruption, being one of the priority crime areas, is included as a separate topic in the Annual Report.
Letos je bila korupcija, kot eno izmed prednostnih področij kaznivih dejanj, vključena v letno poročilo kot posebna tema.
There were 20 cases referred to Eurojust in 2009 (25 in 2008), but due to their sensitivity and the fact that these cases are still ongoing, no detailed information can be included here.
Leta 2009 je bilo Eurojustu predloženih 20 primerov (25 primerov v letu 2008), vendar v tem poročilu ne moremo omenjati podrobnosti zaradi občutljivosti podatkov in dejstva, da ti primeri še niso zaključeni.
• to promote the early warning of suspicious transaction reports and the computerised VAT Information Exchange System (VIES) by the competent administrative authorities for the exchange of information at national level to the prosecutorial and judicial authorities;
• zgodnje opozarjanje na poročila o sumljivih transakcijah in podatke iz računalniškega sistema izmenjave informacij o DDV-ju (VIES) s strani pristojnih upravnih organov zaradi posredovanja
As the result of actions taken at two coordination meetings held at Eurojust in 2009, two Member States have commenced and co-ordinated corruption investigations.
Na podlagi ukrepov, sprejetih na dveh koordinacijskih srečanjih v Eurojustu leta
Cybercrime perpetrators located in different countries, servers located in yet other countries and predicate offences (criminal activities from which the proceeds of the crime are derived) committed throughout the world.
Koordinacijska srečanja so bistvena v primerih spletnega kriminala, ker so v te primere praviloma vpleteni storilci iz različnih držav, strežniki so nameščeni v drugih državah, predhodna kazniva dejanja (kazniva dejanja, katerih posledica je ustvarjena premoženjska korist) pa so bila storjena po vsem svetu.
The 2008 Council Conclusions on a Concerted Work Strategy and Practical Measures against Cybercrime recognised a recent increase in transnational offences committed via the internet.
Leta 2008 je bilo s Sklepi Sveta o usklajeni strategiji dela in praktičnih ukrepih zoper spletni kriminal ugotovljeno, da se je v zadnjih letih zvišalo število čezmejnih kaznivih dejanj, storjenih s pomočjo svetovnega spleta.
Eurojust registered 31 cybercrime cases in 2009, of which 17 also involved computer fraud.
Leta 2009 je Eurojust obravnaval 31 primerov spletnega kriminala, od katerih je pri 17 primerih šlo tudi za računalniško goljufijo.
process the huge amount of information for evidential purposes.
Eurojust je organiziral pet koordinacijskih srečanj o spletnem kriminalu ter nekaj pripravljalnih sestankov za koordinacijska srečanja, ki bodo potekala v letu 2010.
Although letters rogatory are still necessary, complex financial investigations and prosecutions cannot be efficiently conducted on the basis of such letters alone.
V večini čezmejnih primerov v zvezi z gospodarskimi kaznivimi dejanji, storjenimi s pomočjo spleta, kot so goljufije s plačilnimi karticami ali transakcije s kurirji, je koordinacija preiskav in kazenskih pregonov bistvenega pomena.
In that sense, the involvement of Eurojust has already proven to be highly successful.
Ob upoštevanju ogromnega in naraščajočega števila teh
In a corruption case involving the UK and Denmark and involving various jurisdictions, Eurojust provided assistance in the formation of a JIT for more efficient evidence gathering, facilitating the initiation of court proceedings in 2009.
2009, sta dve državi članici začeli in koordinirali preiskave korupcije.
Eurojust held five coordination meetings on cybercrime, and several preparatory meetings for coordination meetings to be held in 2010.
Srečanji sta organom držav članic omogočili koordinacijo preiskav in obdelavo obsežnih informacij zaradi pridobivanja dokazov.
For the majority of the transnational cases involving economic crimes via the internet, such as payment card fraud and transactions through mules, coordination of the investigations and prosecutions is essential.
Čeprav so še vedno potrebna zaprosila za pravno pomoč, ni možno zagotoviti uspešne izvedbe zahtevnih finančnih preiskav in kazenskih pregonov le na podlagi takšnih zaprosil.
It is clear that in corruption cases, complicated letters rogatory can be a serious drain on limited investigation time and resources.
V tem smislu se je potrdilo, da je vključitev Eurojusta izredno učinkovita poteza.
By advising on drafting, legal requirements and subsequent execution, Eurojust can significantly assist in ensuring that complex cross-border investigations are facilitated.
V primeru korupcije, v katerega sta bila vpletena Združeno kraljestvo in Danska oziroma državi z različnimi sodnimi pristojnostmi, je Eurojust sodeloval pri ustanovitvi skupne preiskovalne skupine za učinkovitejše zbiranje dokazov in omogočil začetek sodnih postopkov v letu 2009.
and the total loss resulting from the criminal activity investigated is estimated to be over €950,000.
181 prijav, celotna ocenjena izguba, ki je nastala zaradi kaznivih dejanj, pa presega 950 000 evrov.
At the coordination meeting, judicial aspects and mechanisms for the collection and exchange of evidence between the involved Member States were explained, and a conflict of jurisdiction matter was dealt with.
Na koordinacijskem srečanju so bili pojasnjeni pravosodni vidiki in mehanizmi za zbiranje in izmenjavo dokaznega gradiva med vpletenimi državami članicami, obravnavan pa je bil tudi spor o pristojnosti.
In total, 17 people were arrested in Romania alone, 6 EAWs were executed and 29 people were sent to trial.
Samo v Romuniji je bilo aretiranih 17 oseb, izvršenih 6 ENPP-jev, 29 oseb pa je bilo obravnavanih pred sodiščem.
In a case of internet auction fraud, two criminal groups were active in Romania and abroad.
V primeru goljufije, storjene preko spletne dražbe, sta delovali dve kriminalni združbi v Romuniji in v tujini.
After payment was received, the money was picked up by so-called “mules” (people who transfer money and may be involved in reshipping goods that have been fraudulently obtained in one country, usually via the internet, to another country where the perpetrator of the fraud lives) using fake IDs and in complicity with Western Union and telegram operators.
Po prejemu plačila so denar vzeli tako imenovani kurirji (osebe, ki so lahko vpletene v preprodajo blaga, ki je bilo pridobljeno z goljufijo, običajno preko spleta, v eni državi in ki prenašajo denar v drugo državo, kjer živi storilec goljufije), pri čemer so uporabili ponarejene osebne dokumente in sodelovali z operaterji družbe Western Union in telegramskih služb.
In total, 181 complaints were received
Skupaj je bilo prejetih
Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK.
Nizozemskem, v Španiji, na Švedskem, v Švici in Združenem kraljestvu.
Two coordination meetings were held at Eurojust to identify targets and organise a joint operation.
Eurojust je organiziral dve koordinacijski srečanji zaradi določanja ciljev in organizacije skupnega delovanja.
Eurojust facilitated the execution of EAWs with Belgian, Irish, Italian, Dutch, and Romanian magistrates and co-ordinated requests for interception.
Eurojust je omogočil izvršitev ENPP-jev v belgiji, na Irskem, v Italiji, na Nizozemskem in v Romuniji ter koordiniral zaprosila za prisluškovanje.
24 people were arrested: 8 in Italy, 12 in Romania, 2 in the netherlands and 2 in Belgium.
Aretiranih je bilo 24 oseb: 8 v Italiji, 12 v Romuniji, 2 na Nizozemskem in 2 v belgiji.
In several house searches, illegal equipment, counterfeit payment cards, drugs, weapons, and large sums of cash were seized.
V hišnih preiskavah so zasegli nedovoljeno opremo, ponarejene plačilne kartice, mamila, orožje in velike vsote gotovine.
In another case, Italian authorities led an investigation into a group suspected of carrying out skimming of at least 15,000 payment cards in the European Union, with a total of over 35,000 fraudulent transactions and losses amounting to approximately €6.5 million.
V drugem primeru so italijanski organi izvedli preiskavo skupine, ki je bila osumljena nedovoljenega prepisa zapisa najmanj 15 000 plačilnih kartic v EU oziroma skupaj več kot 35 000 goljufivih transakcij in izgub v višini približno 6,5 milijonov evrov.
The case, targeting a Romanian organised crime group operating in Italy and Spain, was submitted to Eurojust in 2009 to plan a co-ordinated action for simultaneous arrests.
Primer, v katerega je bila vpletena romunska organizirana kriminalna združba, ki je delovala v Italiji in Španiji, je bil predložen Eurojustu v letu 2009 zaradi načrtovanja usklajene akcije za sočasne aretacije.
Eurojust and Europol co-operated in this case, and Europol’s analysis identified links to criminal offences in Italy, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Moldova, the netherlands, Spain, to lawful and voluntary consent of the competent person, to access stored computer data in other Member States where directly accessible, without the authorisation of these Member States.
V tem primeru sta sodelovala Eurojust in Europol. Na podlagi Europolove analize so ugotovili povezave s kaznivimi dejanji v Italiji, belgiji, Franciji, Nemčiji, na Irskem, v Moldaviji, na transakcij bi bilo potrebno na evropski ravni doseči skupni pristop in dogovor o obravnavi teh primerov, zlasti glede pristojnosti za izvajanje preiskav in kazenskih pregonov kurirjev in posameznikov, ki uporabljajo ponarejene plačilne kartice.
such cases would be beneficial on a European level, particularly concerning the jurisdiction for investigations and prosecutions of mules and of individuals using false payment cards.
članici ob pridobitvi zakonitega in prostovoljnega soglasja pristojne osebe tudi možnost dostopa do shranjenih računalniških podatkov v drugih državah članicah, če je omogočen neposreden dostop do teh podatkov, brez pooblastila teh držav članic.
Money laundering, the process by which criminals attempt to conceal the true origin and ownership of the proceeds of criminal activities, is often perpetrated by OCGs, and is closely connected to most organised crime offences with a transnational dimension.
Pranje denarja je proces, v katerem skušajo storilci prikriti resnično poreklo in lastništvo prihodkov iz kaznivih dejanj, ki ga pogosto zagrešijo organizirane kriminalne združbe in je tesno povezan z najbolj organiziranimi oblikami kaznivih dejanj čezmejnih razsežnosti.
The horizontal nature of money laundering has been stressed by the OCTA 2009 and the ROCTA 2008, and subsequently identified by the Council as one of the EU priorities in the fight against organised crime.
Horizon-talna narava pranja denarja je bila poudarjena v oceni OCTA za leto 2009 in oceni ROCTA za leto 2008, nato pa jo je Svet opredelil kot eno izmed prednostnih nalog EU v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu.
The EU priorities have highlighted the danger of an increasing criminal influence in the political, economic and judicial spheres, especially in connection with Russian-speaking OCGs.
Prednostne naloge EU poudarjajo nevarnost naraščajočega vpliva kaznivih dejanj na politiko, gospodarstvo in pravosodje, zlasti v zvezi z organiziranimi kriminalnimi združbami iz rusko govore-
laundering and investments by external OCGs in the European Union and more generally to financial aspects, including asset recovery.
Finska je organizirala dve koordinacijski srečanji v zvezi s posebej zahtevnim primerom pranja denarja, v katerega so bile vpletene Ruska federacija, Finska, Nemčija in druge države.
The legal framework in relation to money laundering is complex, due to the number of relevant legal instruments issued by the European Union, the Council of Europe and the United nations.
Pravni okvir v zvezi s pranjem denarja je zahteven zaradi številnih pomembnih pravnih instrumentov EU, Sveta Evrope in Združenih narodov.
In the European Union, instruments focus on prevention, confiscation and recovery of criminal assets.
V EU so instrumenti osredotočeni na preprečevanje, odvzem in vračanje premoženja.
Given the complexity of this legal framework, Eurojust has devoted efforts to facilitating the practical application of the European legal instruments and international conventions against money laundering.
Zaradi zahtevnosti tega pravnega okvira si je Eurojust prizadeval za praktično uporabo evropskih pravnih instrumentov in mednarodnih konvencij zoper pranje denarja.
Finland held two coordination meetings on a particularly complex money laundering case involving the Russian Federation, Finland, Germany, and other EU countries. large amounts of money of suspicious origin were being moved from all over the world to Finland (where a company coordinating the money transfers had its seat) and to other EU Member States, including Germany.
Leta 2009 je Eurojust organiziral 19 koordinacijskih srečanj v zvezi s primeri pranja denarja. Na večini teh koordinacijskih srečanj je Eurojust pospešil izmenjavo informacij med organi odkrivanja (tako administrativnimi kot policijskimi organi) in pravosodnimi organi držav članic EU in tretjih držav, spodbujal izvrševanje zaprosil za pravno pomoč ter reševal praktične težave v zvezi s temi zaprosili, koordiniral izvršitev sočasnih aretacij in preiskav ter pospešil zaseg premoženja ali dokazov.
The success of the coordination meetings has led to consideration of extending their scope to involve the Russian authorities, since this cooperation is vital to investigating the purpose of money transfers to offshore banks.
Posebna pozornost je posvečena potrebni izmenjavi informacij med vpletenimi pristojnimi organi zaradi uspešnejšega odkrivanja sumljivih gotovinskih transakcij.
Money laundering is one of the most common crime types dealt with at Eurojust.
Pranje denarja je ena najpogostejših vrst kaznivih dejanj, ki jih obravnava Eurojust.
Spain, the netherlands, and the UK are the Member States with most requests in money laundering cases registered since 2004.
Španija, Nizozemska in Združeno kraljestvo so države članice z najštevilnejšimi zaprosili v primerih pranja denarja od leta 2004 naprej.
In 2009, 125 cases
Leta 2009 je Eurojust obravnaval 125 primerov, kar je za skoraj
When letters rogatory are executed prior to the coordination meeting, evaluation of the information and evidence collected is very useful.
“Lastno pranje denarja” (denarne transakcije v zvezi s prihodki iz kaznivih dejanj, ki jih pralec denarja stori sam) je kaznivo dejanje v nekaterih državah članicah, ne pa tudi v vseh.
Some of the main legal issues identifiable in Eurojust’s casework with regard to money laundering can be summarised as follows.
Sledi povzetek glavnih pravnih vprašanj, ki so prisotna med primeri pranja denarja, obravnavanih v Eurojustu.
28 result was a “double” coordination meeting in which Portugal invited France, and France invited luxembourg and Belgium. letters rogatory were executed before the meeting took place, so that the participants could evaluate data and evidence requested under those letters rogatory during the meeting.
28 prihodkov, predmetov in premoženja iz kaznivih dejanj, in so jo sprejeli.
The Portuguese authorities had started investigations of money laundering-related offences, which were partially committed in France.
Portugalski organi so začeli preiskave kaznivih dejanj v zvezi s pranjem denarja, ki so deloma potekala tudi v Franciji.
When a letter rogatory was sent to France, it became clear that France was already investigating related criminal activity.
Ko je bilo zaprosilo za pravno pomoč poslano v Francijo, je postalo jasno, da Francija že preiskuje povezana kazniva dejanja.
A coordination meeting was called.
Eurojust je sklical koordinacijsko srečanje.
The predicate offence was not clearly identified in the letter rogatory.
Medtem je Francija odkrila povezave z Luksemburgom in belgijo.
After Eurojust’s involvement, it was agreed that it would be sufficient to establish the probability that the source of the laundered proceeds was not legal.
Zaradi tega je prišlo do “dvojnega” koordinacijskega srečanja, na katero je Portugalska povabila Francijo, Francija pa je povabila Luksemburg in belgijo.
This solution was considered to be in line with the Framework Decision of 24 February 2005 on confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property, and was accepted by the parties.
Zaprosila za medsebojno pravno pomoč so bila izvršena še pred srečanjem, tako da so lahko udeleženci že med srečanjem ocenili podatke in dokaze, zahtevane v teh zaprosilih.
In such cases, flexibility and pragmatic solutions may be required to ensure that the proceeds of the predicate offences can be seized and confiscated, irrespective of different definitions of money laundering.
To povzroča dejanske težave na področju boja proti pranju denarja, saj je hitra izvršitev zaprosil vedno bistvena za preprečevanje bančnih nakazil nedovoljenih sredstev.
Traditional MlA instruments do not always ensure the speedy execution of requests.
Prav tako so bila ugotovljena vprašanja dvojne kaznivosti in dokaznega bremena.
Some of the problems detected are related to delays in the execution of letters rogatory and requests for supplementary information.
Izvršitev zaprosil za medsebojno pravno pomoč v primerih pranja denarja privede do težav, če ni razvidna povezava med predhodnim kaznivim dejanjem in kaznivim dejanjem pranja denarja.
These are real issues in the field of anti-money laundering as the prompt execution of letters rogatory is always essential to prevent the transfer of illegal funds between bank accounts.
V enem primeru je država članica zavrnila pravosodno pomoč, ker v zaprosilu ni bilo jasno opredeljeno predhodno kaznivo dejanje. Po vključitvi Eurojusta je bil dosežen dogovor, da bi zadostovalo, če bi ugotovili verjetnost nezakonitosti vira opranega prihodka.
The limited use of mutual recognition instruments, in part because they have not been implemented under national
Udeleženci srečanja so ocenili, da je ta rešitev v skladu z Okvirnim sklepom z dne 24. februarja 2005 o zasegu
“Self-laundering” (money transactions related to proceeds of crimes committed by the launderer himself) is a criminal offence in some, but not all, Member States.
Potrebno je upoštevati tudi omejeno uporabo instrumentov medsebojnega priznavanja, kar je delno posledica dejstva, da jih niso implementirale vse države članice v svojih nacionalnih zakonodajah.
A consequence of this situation is that difficulties in judicial cooperation may arise where Member States with different approaches are involved.
Kot primer navajamo Okvirni sklep z dne 22. julija 2003 o izvršitvi odredb o zasegu premoženja ali dokazov ter Okvirni sklep z dne 6. oktobra 2006 o uporabi načela medsebojnega priznavanja pri odredbah o zasegu.
In a number of Eurojust cases, the person committing the predicate offence (criminal activity from which the proceeds of the crime are derived) does an act that is considered as “self-laundering” in the Member State where the action takes place, but the prosecution takes place in a Member State where “self-laundering”
Uveljavljanje teh sklepov bi v praksi omogočilo hitro izvajanje zaprosil, je, da lahko nastopijo težave v pravosodnem sodelovanju, če so vpletene države članice z različnimi pristopi.