natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Lastly, as regards the protection of human health in terms of food safety, that Member State claims that the issue of a licence helps fulfil the requirement of product traceability.
Končno, ta država članica v zvezi z varovanjem zdravja oseb z vidika varnosti živil trdi, da izdaja licence prispeva k izpolnjevanju zahteve po sledljivosti proizvodov.
It maintains that, in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation No 178/2002, the traceability of food must be established at all stages of production, processing and distribution.
Zatrjuje, da se v skladu s členom 18 Uredbe (ES) �t. 178/2002 za vsa živila zagotovi sledljivost v vseh fazah pridelave, predelave in distribucije.
It thus submits that the principle of traceability also applies to semen which, being a living biological product, underpins the process of livestock production and it adds that the insemination centres ensure the security of the trade in semen and carry out the documentary and physical checks and checks on the identity of that product.
Navaja torej, da se načelo sledljivosti proizvodov uporablja tudi za seme, živ biolo�ki proizvod, ki vstopa v postopek proizvodnje živine, in dodaja, da osemenjevalna sredi�ča zagotavljajo varnost prometa s semenom in nadzor tega proizvoda s pregledom dokumentacije, fizičnim pregledom in preverjanjem identifikacije semena.
The Commission submits that the act of insemination, even if it requires certain competences and precautions, does not involve any particular difficulty which might warrant such a serious obstacle to freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services.
Komisija meni, da postopek osemenjevanja, čeprav so zanj nujne določene sposobnosti in previdnostni ukrepi, ne pomeni posebne težavnosti, ki bi lahko upravičila tako hudo oviro svobodi ustanavljanja in svobodi opravljanja storitev.
The Commission submits that the health objectives relied upon can be satisfied adequately as long as the ability of the inseminator is proved, whether by a certificate of aptitude, evidence of veterinary training or indeed, for Community nationals, by a system of recognition.
Komisija zatrjuje, da bi bili navajani zdravstveni cilji lahko zadostno doseženi, če bi bila usposobljenost osemenjevalca dokazana ali z imetni�tvom potrdila o usposobljenosti, ali z dokazilom o veterinarski izobrazbi, ali za državljane Skupnosti z mehanizmom priznavanja.
In any event, according to the Commission, the French provisions at issue must be held to be unjustified and disproportionate.
Vsekakor pa je treba po mnenju Komisije sporne francoske določbe �teti za neupravičene in nesorazmerne.
As regards the traceability of the semen, the Commission observes, referring to Directives 87/328 and 88/407, that Community harmonisation in the health and zootechnical fields is intended, inter alia, to ensure that concerns about health are met at all stages of the collection and transportation of sperm and its identification.
Komisija v zvezi s sledljivostjo semena ob sklicevanju na direktivi 87/328 in 88/407 opozarja, da je uskladitev Skupnosti na zdravstvenem in zootehničnem področju namenjena zlasti zagotavljanju spo�tovanja zdravstvenih ciljev na vseh ravneh zbiranja in prevoza semena ter njegovi identifikaciji.
It thus takes the view that giving responsibility to artificial insemination centres with exclusive territorial rights is not the appropriate means for the purpose of ensuring a high level of protection and that the legislation at issue cannot be founded on a systematic distrust of independent operators, in particular those from other Member States.
Meni torej, da odgovornost osemenjevalnih sredi�č, ki imajo izključno pravico na določenem območju, ni primerno sredstvo za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varovanja in da zadevna ureditev ne more temeljiti na tem, da neodvisni gospodarski subjekti sistematično ne zaupajo zlasti tistim, ki izhajajo iz drugih držav članic.
As regards the objectives of the protection of animal health and the health of the operator practising the semen insemination, it is necessary to observe, as the Commission has, that those objectives invoked by the French Republic might be attained by less restrictive measures, inter alia by the requirement of appropriate evidence of aptitude.
Kar zadeva cilja varovanja zdravja živali in zdravja osebe, ki opravlja postopek osemenjevanja, je treba opozoriti, kot je navedla Komisija, da je ta cilja, ki ju navaja Francoska republika, mogoče doseči z manj omejevalnimi ukrepi, zlasti z zahtevo po dokazu o ustrezni usposobljenosti.
A mechanism for the checking and recognition of veterinary qualifications or the requirement of a certificate of aptitude is capable of demonstrating whether the persons concerned possess the necessary knowledge and qualifications to safeguard those interests.
Z mehanizmom nadzora in priznavanja veterinarskih diplom ali zahtevo po potrdilu o usposobljenosti bi bilo mogoče dokazati, da imajo zadevne osebe znanje in poklicne kvalifikacije, potrebne za za�čito navedenih interesov.
However, the system at issue is based on much more restrictive measures, namely the granting of exclusive rights over defined geographical areas to authorised insemination centres and making the issue of an inseminator’s licence subject to the in -seminator concluding an agreement with such a centre.
Zadevni sistem tako temelji na veliko bolj omejevalnih ukrepih, in sicer na podelitvi izključne pravice na določenem geografskem območju odobrenim osemenjevalnim sredi�čem in na pogojevanju izdaje licence za osemenjevalca s sklenitvijo pogodbe s takim sredi�čem.
Admittedly, it is legitimate for a Member State, in order to verify an applicant’s ability to carry out the tasks of an inseminator, to require a licence for the exercise of that
Nedvomno je legitimno, da države članice, zato da se prepričajo o usposobljenosti kandidata za naloge osemenjevalca, za izvajanje dejavnosti osemenjevanja
2008 — CASE C-389/05 activity.
2008 – ZADEVA C-389/05 predpi�ejo zahtevo po licenci.
However, in the present case, that licence is granted only if an agreement has been concluded between the applicant and an authorised artificial insemination centre.
Vendar se v obravnavanem primeru ta licenca podeli, le če kandidat in odobreno osemenjevalno sredi�če skleneta pogodbo.
As the Commission observes, in the case of an authorisation procedure for carrying out an activity, in its application of the national provisions the Member State concerned must take into account the knowledge and qualifications already acquired by the party concerned in another Member State (see, to that effect, Vlassopoulou, paragraph 15).
Tako je treba v zvezi s postopkom dovoljenj za izvajanje dejavnosti navesti, kot trdi Komisija, da mora zadevna država članica pri uporabi nacionalnih določb upo�tevati znanja in poklicne kvalifikacije, ki jih je zadevna oseba pridobila že v drugi državi članici (glej v tem smislu zgoraj navedeno sodbo Vlassopoulou, točka 15).
In the context of this authorisation procedure, the examination of abilities and qualifications must be carried out by the national authorities in accordance with a procedure in conformity with the requirements of Community law concerning the effective protection of the fundamental rights conferred by the Treaty on Community subjects.
V okviru tega postopka dovoljenj morajo nacionalni organi opraviti preizkus usposobljenosti in poklicnih kvalifikacij na podlagi postopka, ki je v skladu z zahtevami prava Skupnosti v zvezi z učinkovitim varstvom temeljnih pravic, ki jih Pogodba podeljuje državljanom Skupnosti.
Consequently, reasons must be given for a decision taken following that examination and it must be capable of being made the subject of judicial proceedings (see, to that effect, Case 222/86 Heylens and Others [1987] ECR 4097, paragraph 17, and Vlassopoulou, paragraph 22).
Zato mora biti odločba, sprejeta ob koncu tega preizkusa, obrazložena in taka, da jo je mogoče izpodbijati s pravnim sredstvom pred sodi�čem (glej v tem smislu sodbo z dne 15. oktobra 1987 v zadevi Heylens in drugi, 222/86, Recueil, str. 4097, točka 17, in zgoraj navedeno sodbo Vlassopoulou, točka 22).
Moreover, a prior administrative authorisation scheme must be based on objective nondiscriminatory criteria known in advance, in such a way as to circumscribe the exercise of the national authorities’discretion, so that it is not used arbitrarily (see Analir, paragraph 38).
Poleg tega mora sistem predhodne odobritve temeljiti na objektivnih, nediskriminatornih in vnaprej poznanih merilih, ki določajo meje pooblastila nacionalnih organov za odločanje po prostemu preudarku, zato da to odločanje ni samovoljno (glej zgoraj navedeno sodbo Analir in drugi, točka 38).
However, that agreement must be signed with an artificial insemination centre which is in potential competition on the insemination market with the same operator whose competence as an inseminator it is supposed to check.
Navedeno pogodbo je tako treba podpisati z osemenjevalnim sredi�čem, ki je na trgu osemenjevanja potencialni konkurent istega gospodarskega subjekta, katerega sposobnosti za osemenjevalca bi moral preveriti.
In addition, the conclusion of that agreement is left to the discretion of the managing directors of those centres, who are not required to sign it even if the candidate fulfils the objective nondiscriminatory selection criteria known in advance.
Poleg tega je sklenitev te pogodbe pridržana prostemu preudarku predsednikov teh sredi�č, ki je niso zavezani podpisati, tudi če kandidat izpolnjuje objektivna, nediskriminatorna in vnaprej poznana merila usposobljenosti.
Accordingly, the conclusion of the agreement is not an appropriate examination procedure, allowing the authorities of the host Member State to check solely and
V teh okoli�činah sklenitev pogodbe ne pomeni primernega postopka preizkusa, ki bi organom države članice gostiteljice omogočal, da se objektivno prepričajo le
COMMISSION v FRANCE objectively the abilities of inseminators from another Member State, and does not meet the criteria referred to in paragraphs 93 and 94 of this judgment.
KOMISIJA PROTI FRANCIJI o usposobljenosti osemenjevalcev, ki izhajajo iz druge države članice, in ne izpolnjuje meril, navedenih v točkah 93 in 94 te sodbe.
As regards food safety and the traceability of semen, in contrast to what the French Republic submits, Article 18 of Regulation No 178/2002 cannot be interpreted to justify the restrictions stemming from the system at issue.
V zvezi z varnostjo hrane in sledljivostjo semena je treba ugotoviti, da se v nasprotju s trditvami Francoske republike člena 18 Uredbe �t. 178/2002 ne sme razlagati tako, da bi lahko upravičil omejitve, ki so posledica zadevnega sistema.
That article concerns the field of food safety, the requirements of which relating to traceability can be met by a system providing that the semen insemination service is carried out by qualified and properly identified persons, without the application of restrictions such as those resulting from the system at issue.
Ta člen se namreč nana�a na področje varnosti hrane, katerega zahtevam po sledljivosti je mogoče zadostiti s sistemom, ki predvideva, da storitev osemenjevanja opravljajo strokovno kvalificirane in pravilno identificirane osebe, ne da bi bilo treba uporabiti omejitve, kot so tiste, ki so posledica zadevnega sistema.
Furthermore, that Member State has not in any way proved that granting exclusive rights over defined geographical areas to authorised centres and making the issue of an inseminator’s licence subject to concluding an agreement with the managing director of such a centre are proportionate and necessary measures for the purposes of guaranteeing food safety and traceability.
Poleg tega je treba navesti, da ta država članica z ničimer ni dokazala, da geografsko določena izključna pravica, odobrena osemenjevalnim sredi�čem, in pogojevanje izdajanja licence za osemenjevalca s sklenitvijo pogodbe s predsednikom takega sredi�ča pomenita ukrepa, ki sta nujna in sorazmerna za zagotavljanje varnosti hrane in sledljivosti.
No evidence has been submitted to prove that the obligations imposed on inseminators as regards the quality and use of the semen and the checking of whether those obligations have been observed require the granting of those exclusive rights or the condition imposed for the issue of the licence.
Predložen ni bil noben dokaz, ki bi izkazoval, da je za obveznosti, naložene osemenjevalcem v zvezi s kakovostjo in uporabo semena, ter za nadzor nad spo�tovanjem teh obveznosti nujna geografsko določena izključna pravica ali pogojevanje izdaje navedene licence.
In those circumstances, the justification relied on by the French Republic alleging the protection of public health cannot be accepted.
V teh okoli�činah ni mogoče sprejeti utemeljitve Francoske republike v zvezi z varovanjem javnega zdravja.
Town and country planning requirements
Zahteve po prostorskem načrtovanju
The French Republic submits that the rules at issue pursue a town and country planning objective and that the Court has already acknowledged that that constitutes an overriding requirement in the public interest (Case C-254/98 TK Heimdienst [2000] ECR I-151, paragraph 34).
Francoska republika trdi, da zadevna nacionalna ureditev zasleduje cilj v zvezi s prostorskim načrtovanjem, ki ga je Sodi�če priznalo kot nujni razlog splo�nega interesa (sodba z dne 13. januarja 2000 v zadevi TK-Heimdienst, C-254/98, Recueil, str. I-151, točka 34).
That Member State claims that that system has enabled it to conserve agricultural activity in the greater part of the French territory, most of which consists of areas sparsely populated with livestock or mountainous areas.
Ta država članica trdi, da je ta ureditev dovoljevala ohranitev kmetijske dejavnosti na veliko večjem delu francoskega ozemlja, na katerem prevladujejo območja s slabo razvito živinorejo in gorata območja.
It submits that preserving cattle breeds adapted to the climactic constraints and terrain has allowed livestock rearing to be maintained in regions threatened with depopulation on account of their climatic or geographical characteristics.
Navaja, da je ohranitev vrst goveda, prilagojenega na neugodne podnebne in reliefne razmere, omogočila ohranitev živinoreje v regijah, ki jim grozi opusto�enje zaradi njihovih podnebnih ali geografskih značilnosti.
According to the Commission, the exclusive rights over a determined geographical area granted to authorised insemination centres cannot be justified, in the absence of statistical data, by the contention that, without those exclusive rights, a large part of the French territory might be deprived of insemination services.
Komisija meni, da geografsko določene izključne pravice, podeljene odobrenim osemenjevalnim sredi�čem, ni mogoče – brez statističnih podatkov – upravičiti s trditvijo, da brez te izključne pravice velikemu delu francoskega ozemlja ne bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti storitev osemenjevanja.
In any event, the Commission submits that the preservation of breeds adapted to the climatic constraints or constraints imposed by the terrain would not be affected by the removal of the obstacles at issue.
Komisija trdi, da odprava spornih ovir nikakor ne more vplivati na ohranitev vrst, prilagojenih na neugodne podnebne in reliefne razmere.
As the Commission states, the French Republic’s contentions are not substantiated by any statistical information or data.
Navesti je treba, kot trdi Komisija, da trditve Francoske republike niso podprte z nobeno informacijo ali statističnim podatkom.
That Member State has not fully established that the exclusive rights over defined geographical areas granted to those authorised centres were necessary to ensure that the insemination service was offered throughout French territory.
Ta država članica ni izčrpno dokazala, da je bila geografsko določena izključna pravica, podeljena odobrenim osemenjevalnih sredi�čem, nujna, da bi se storitev osemenjevanja zagotovila na celotnem francoskem ozemlju.
In addition, that justification could not be relied upon so far as the areas of French territory which do not have the unfavourable characteristics described by that Member State are concerned.
Poleg tega te utemeljitve ni mogoče uveljavljati za tista območja francoskega ozemlja, ki nimajo neugodnih značilnosti, ki jih navaja navedena država članica.
Consequently, as the Advocate General observed in point 83 of his Opinion, without it being necessary to consider whether planning requirements are in theory capable of justifying restrictions on freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, it has not been established that such requirements exist in this case and that they are such as to render those exclusive rights over determined geographical areas necessary.
Zato, kot je navedel generalni pravobranilec v točki 83 sklepnih predlogov, ni treba preučiti, ali je z zahtevami v zvezi s prostorskim načrtovanjem teoretično mogoče upravičiti ukrepe, ki omejujejo svobodo ustanavljanja in svobodo opravljanja storitev, saj ni dokazano, ali te zahteve v obravnavanem primeru dejansko obstajajo in ali bi bila zaradi njih omenjena geografsko določena izključna pravica nujna.
In those circumstances, the justification relied upon by the French Republic concerning planning requirements must also be rejected.
V teh okoli�činah je treba utemeljevanje Francoske republike v zvezi z zahtevami po prostorskem načrtovanju prav tako zavrniti.
It follows that, in the absence of any proper justification for the restrictions at issue, the Commission’s action must be held to be well founded.
Iz tega sledi, da je treba tožbo Komisije zaradi neobstoja upravičenega razloga za zadevne omejitve �teti za utemeljeno.
Therefore, in the light of the foregoing considerations it must be held that, by allowing only authorised artificial insemination centres, with exclusive rights over determined geographical areas, and persons holding an inseminator’s licence, the issue of which is subject to the conclusion of an agreement with one of those centres, to provide the service of artificial insemination of bovine animals, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 EC and 49 EC.
Glede na navedene preudarke je treba ugotoviti, da je Francoska republika s tem, da je geografsko določeno izključno pravico zagotavljanja storitev osemenjevanja goveda pridržala odobrenim osemenjevalnim sredi�čem in imetnikom licence za osemenjevalca, katere izdaja je pogojena s sklenitvijo pogodbe z enim od teh sredi�č, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz členov 43 ES in 49 ES.
Since the Commission has asked that the French Republic be ordered to pay the costs and the latter has been unsuccessful, the French Republic must be ordered to pay the costs.
Ker je Komisija predlagala, naj se Francoski republiki naloži plačilo stro�kov, in ker ta s predlogi ni uspela, se ji naloži plačilo stro�kov.
Declares that, by allowing only authorised artificial insemination centres, with exclusive rights over determined geographical areas, and persons holding an inseminator’s licence, the issue of which is subject to the conclusion of an agreement with one of those centres, to provide the service of artificial insemination of bovine animals, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 EC and 49 EC.
Francoska republika s tem, da je geografsko določeno izključno pravico zagotavljanja storitev osemenjevanja goveda pridržala odobrenim osemenjevalnim središčem in imetnikom licence za osemenjevalca, katere izdaja je pogojena s sklenitvijo pogodbe z enim od teh središč, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz členov 43 ES in 49 ES.
Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.
Francoski republiki se naloži plačilo stroškov.
Case C-132/06
Zadeva C-132/06
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 10 EC — Sixth VAT Directive — Obligations under domestic rules — Control of taxable transactions — Amnesty)
„Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Člen 10 ES – Šesta direktiva o DDV – Obveznosti po nacionalni ureditvi – Nadzor obdavčljivih transakcij – Amnestija“
Tax provisions — Harmonisation of laws — Turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax — Obligations of taxpayers
Davčne določbe – Usklajevanje zakonodaj – Prometni davek – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost – Obveznosti davkoplačevalcev
SUMMARY — CASE C-132/06
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-132/06
A Member State whose legislation provides for a general and indiscriminate waiver of verification of taxable transactions effected in a series of tax years fails to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 and 22 of Sixth Dir -ective 77/388 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes and under Article 10 EC, where it provides:
Država članica, katere pravo določa splo�no in nerazlikovalno opustitev preverjanja obdavčljivih transakcij, ki so bile opravljene v več davčnih letih, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz členov 2 in 22 Šeste direktive 77/388 o usklajevanju zakonodaje držav članic o prometnih davkih in člena 10 ES, ker se:
By replacing, shortly after the expiry of the deadlines fixed for the payment of the tax amounts normally payable, the obligations under Articles 2 and 22 of the Sixth Directive for the parties concerned with other obligations which do not require the payment of those amounts, a law such as that at issue renders those articles — which form nevertheless the basis for the common system of value added tax and are thus an intrinsic part of the very structure of that tax — meaningless.
Zakonodaja, kot je zadevna, s tem, da kmalu po izteku rokov, ki so jih imeli davčni zavezanci za plačilo običajno dolgovanih zneskov davka, obveznosti zadevnih oseb iz členov 2 in 22 Šeste direktive nadomesti z drugimi obveznostmi, v skladu s katerimi se ne zahteva plačilo navedenih zneskov, tema členoma, ki sta temelj skupnega sistema davka na dodano vrednost, odvzame učinek in tako posega v samo strukturo tega davka.
The effect of the considerable imbalance between the amounts actually due and the amounts paid by taxable persons wishing to take advantage of the tax amnesty in question is tantamount to a tax exemption.
Veliko neravnovesje med zneski, ki so jih davčni zavezanci, ki so želeli biti zajeti z zadevno davčno amnestijo, dejansko dolgovali, in zneski, ki so jih plačali, praktično vodi do davčne oprostitve.
— that taxable persons who have not complied with their obligations in respect of the tax periods falling between the first and the fourth years preceding the adoption of that law — in certain cases, only one year before the adoption of that law — may completely escape verification, up to double the amount of the tax as it appears from a supplementary return filed in order to rectify previously-filed returns, and
– davčni zavezanec, ki ni spo�toval svojih obveznosti v davčnih letih od enega do �tirih let pred sprejetjem tega zakona – kar je v določenih primerih zgolj eno leto pred sprejetjem tega zakona – lahko izogne vsakemu nadzoru do zneska, ki je enak dvojnemu znesku davka iz dodatnega obračuna, ki je bil predložen, da bi popravil obračune, ki so bili že predloženi, in
It follows that such a law seriously disrupts the proper functioning of the common system of value added tax.
Iz tega izhaja, da taka zakonodaja povzroča resne motnje pravilnega delovanja skupnega sistema DDV.
Its provisions distort the principle of fiscal neutrality by introducing significant variations in the treatment of taxable persons in the Member State in question.
Njene določbe, s tem da uvajajo pomembna odstopanja pri obravnavanju davčnih zavezancev na zadevnem ozemlju, izkrivljajo načelo davčne nevtralnosti.
For the same reason, those provisions infringe the obligation to ensure that the tax is collected in a uniform manner in all the Member States.
Te določbe iz istih razlogov pomenijo kr�itev obveznosti zagotoviti pobiranje davkov enotno v vseh državah članicah.