natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With a view to safeguarding public health, the directive establishes common rules regarding the composition, labelling and packaging of cosmetic products.
Za varovanje javnega zdravja ta direktiva vzpostavlja enotna pravila glede sestave, označevanja in pakiranja kozmetičnih izdelkov.
2008 — CASE C-257/06
2008 – ZADEVA C-257/06
Article 7 of Directive 76/768 provides:
V členu 7 Direktive 76/768 je določeno:
Member States may not, for reasons related to the requirements laid down in this Directive and the Annexes thereto, refuse, prohibit or restrict the marketing of any cosmetic products which comply with the requirements of this Directive and the Annexes thereto.
Države članice ne smejo zaradi zahtev te direktive in prilog k direktivi zavrniti, prepovedati ali omejiti trženja katerih koli kozmetičnih izdelkov, ki izpolnjujejo določbe te direktive in prilog k direktivi.
They may, however, require that the particulars provided for in Article 6(1) (b), (c), (d) and (f) be expressed at least in their own national or official language or languages; they may also require that the particulars provided for in Article 6(1) (g) be expressed in a language easily understood by the consumer.
Lahko pa zahtevajo, da so podatki, navedeni v členu 6(1)(b), (c), (d) in (f), napisan[i] vsaj v njihovem nacionalnem ali uradnem jeziku ali jezikih; lahko tudi zahtevajo, da so podatki, navedeni v členu 6(1)(g), napisan[i] v jeziku, ki je potro�niku lahko razumljiv.
Furthermore, a Member State may, for purposes of prompt and appropriate medical treatment in the event of difficulties, require that appropriate and adequate information on substances used in cosmetic products be made available to the competent authority, which shall ensure that that information is used only for the purposes of such treatment.
Nadalje lahko država članica zaradi hitrega in ustreznega zdravljenja v primeru težav zahteva, da so ustrezne in zadostne informacije o snoveh, uporabljenih v kozmetičnih izdelkih, na voljo pristojnemu organu, ki bo zagotovil, da so te informacije uporabljene samo za namene takega zdravljenja.
Each Member State shall designate a competent authority and send details thereof to the Commission, which shall publish that information in the Official Journal of the European Communities.’
Vsaka država članica imenuje pristojni organ in podrobnosti o njem po�lje Komisiji, ki te informacije objavi v Uradnem listu Evropskih Skupnosti.“
The importation of cosmetic products from countries which are not members of the European Union shall take place under the responsibility of an expert fulfilling the conditions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Uvoz kozmetičnih izdelkov iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije, se opravi pod nadzorom strokovnjaka, ki izpolnjuje pogoje iz odstavkov 1 in 2.
He shall be required to assess the manufacturing process used for the products.
Oceniti mora metode izdelave, uporabljene za izdelke.
Good practice in the manufacture of cosmetic products, which is also based on Community rules, shall be determined and updated by decree of the Minister for Health, acting in conjunction with the Ministers for Industry, Trade, Crafts and Employment and the Minister for Social Welfare.
Dobra praksa glede izdelave kozmetičnih izdelkov, ki temelji tudi na pravilih Skupnosti, se določi in posodobi z dekretom ministra za zdravje v soglasju z ministri, pristojnimi za industrijo, trgovino, obrt in delo ter socialno varstvo.
Any person who intends to produce or package the products referred to in Article 1, on his own behalf or for a third party, shall communicate that in writing to the Ministry of Health and to the Region at least 30 days before the start of that activity.
Kdor namerava na svoj ali tuj račun proizvajati ali pakirati izdelke iz člena 1, vsaj 30 dni pred začetkom te dejavnosti na ministrstvo za zdravje in regijo naslovi pisno vlogo.
(a) the name or the corporate name and the registered office of the business and of the manufacturing plant;
(a) ime ali firmo in sedež podjetja in sedež proizvodne enote;
(b) a description of the premises and equipment making possible confirmation that they have the necessary technical and hygienic features for the type of manufacture referred to and the documents confirming the purchase or lease of that equipment;
(b) opis objektov in opreme, na podlagi katerega se lahko ugotovi, da ustrezajo tehničnim in higienskim zahtevam glede na vrsto nameravane izdelave, ter dokumente, ki dokazujejo nakup ali leasing navedene opreme;
(c) the identity and qualifications of the technical director;
(c) ime in kvalifikacije tehničnega direktorja;
(d) a full and detailed list of the substances used and the substances contained in the commercial product.
(d) popoln in podroben seznam uporabljenih snovi in snovi, ki jih vsebujejo tržni izdelki.
Any amendment to the information referred to in paragraphs 6(a), (b) and (c) shall require a fresh preliminary communication.
Vse spremembe podatkov iz točk (a), (b) in (c) odstavka 6 je treba predhodno sporočiti z novo vlogo.
A similar communication dealing with paragraphs 6(a) to (d) only shall be made by importers of pre-packaged, ready-for-sale, products coming from Member States of the European Union, while importers of those products coming from countries which are not members of the European Union shall be required also to communicate the identity and qualifications of the expert referred to in paragraph 3a.
Ustrezno vlogo, ki vsebuje le točki (a) in (d) odstavka 6, vložijo uvozniki pakiranih izdelkov, pripravljenih za prodajo in s poreklom iz držav članic Evropske unije, uvozniki takih izdelkov iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije, pa morajo navesti tudi ime in kvalifikacije strokovnjaka iz člena 3a.
Roby Profumi is a company established under Italian law and operating in the import-export sector for cosmetic products within the Community market.
Roby Profumi je družba italijanskega prava, ki deluje v sektorju uvoza in izvoza kozmetičnih izdelkov na trgu Skupnosti.
On 9 October 2000 Roby Profumi had a fine of ITL 10 000 000 imposed on it by a local administrative health authority on account of noncompliance with its obligation, set down in Article 10(8) of Law No 713/86, to communicate to the Ministry of Health and to the Region specific information relating to imported cosmetic products.
Tej družbi je lokalni upravni organ, pristojen za zdravstvo, 9. oktobra 2000 naložil denarno kazen 10.000.000 ITL zaradi nespo�tovanja obveznosti iz člena 10(8) zakona �t. 713/86, ker ministrstvu za zdravje in regiji ni sporočila nekaterih podatkov v zvezi z uvoženimi kozmetičnimi izdelki.
Following an administrative appeal brought by Roby Profumi against that decision, the mayor of the Comune di Parma issued an order of injunction on 31 July 2001 confirming the penalty imposed and raising the amount of the fine to ITL 15 000 000.
Župan Comune di Parma je glede ugovora družbe Roby Profumi zoper to odločbo 31. julija 2001 izdal sklep-odredbo, s katerim je bila potrjena naložena kazen, znesek pa zvi�an na 15.000.000 ITL.
Roby Profumi appealed against that order of injunction to the Tribunale di Parma (Parma District Court) (Italy).
Družba Roby Profumi je zoper ta sklep-odredbo vložila tožbo pri Tribunale di Parma.
That court, while taking the view that the obligation under Article 10(8) of Law No 713/86 — which it considers compatible with Community law — had not been met by Roby Profumi, nevertheless partially upheld the appeal by reducing the amount of the fine to ITL 5 000 000.
To sodi�če je sicer menilo, da družba Roby Profumi obveznosti iz člena 10(8) zakona �t. 713/86, glede katere je menilo, da je v skladu s pravom Skupnosti, ni spo�tovala, kljub temu pa je delno ugodilo njeni tožbi, tako da je globo znižalo na 5.000.000 ITL.
Roby Profumi lodged an appeal on a point of law against the decision of the Tribunale di Parma.
Družba Roby Profumi je zoper odločitev Tribunale di Parma vložila zahtevo za varstvo zakonitosti.
It contends, inter alia, that that court should not have applied the aforementioned national provision on the ground that it is contrary to Article 28 EC and Article 7 of Directive 76/768.
Med drugim je menila, da to sodi�če ne bi smelo uporabiti zgoraj navedene nacionalne določbe, ker nasprotuje členu 28 ES in členu 7 Direktive 76/768.
The Corte suprema di cassazione (Supreme Court of Cassation) (Italy), having doubts as regards the compatibility of the Italian provision with the aforementioned Community law provisions, decided to stay proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
Ker je Corte suprema di cassazione imelo pomisleke glede skladnosti italijanske določbe z zgoraj navedenimi določbami prava Skupnosti, je prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo to vpra�anje:
Initial observations
Uvodne ugotovitve
First, it must be borne in mind that, in accordance with settled caselaw, although in a reference for a preliminary ruling the Court cannot give a ruling either on questions which fall within the national law of the Member States or on the compatibility of national provisions with Community law, it can, however, supply a ruling on the interpretation of Community law so as to enable the national court to decide the case before it (see, inter alia, Case C-150/88 Eau de Cologne & Parfümerie-Fabrik 4711 [1989] ECR 3891, paragraph 12, and Case C-124/99 Borawitz [2000] ECR I-7293, paragraph 17). 12
Prvič, treba je spomniti, da lahko Sodi�če, čeprav v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso v okviru predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe sicer ne more odločati niti glede vpra�anj, ki se nana�ajo na notranje pravo držav članic, niti glede skladnosti nacionalnih določb s pravom Skupnosti, vseeno ponudi elemente za razlago prava Skupnosti, ki nacionalnemu sodi�ču omogočajo, da razsodi v sporu, ki mu je predložen (glej zlasti sodbi z dne 23. novembra 1989 v zadevi Eau de Cologne & Parfümerie-Fab - rik 4711, C-150/88, Recueil, str. I-3891, točka 12, in z dne 21. septembra 2000 v zadevi Borawitz, C-124/99, Recueil, str. I-7293, točka 17). 12
It must also be remembered that, in the question referred, the national court is asking, in essence, whether Article 28 EC and Article 7 of Directive 76/768 preclude a national provision which requires the importer of cosmetic products to communicate to the Ministry of Health and to the Region, inter alia, the name or corporate
Treba je tudi ugotoviti, da predložitveno sodi�če s postavljenim vpra�anjem v bistvu spra�uje, ali člen 28 ES in člen 7 Direktive 76/768 nasprotujeta nacionalni določbi, ki uvoznika kozmetičnih izdelkov obvezuje, da ministrstvu za zdravje in regiji sporoči
ROBY PROFUMI name of the business, its registered office and that of the manufacturing plant and a full and detailed list of the substances used and contained in those products.
ROBY PROFUMI med drugim ime ali firmo podjetja, njegov sedež in sedež proizvodne enote ter popoln in podroben seznam uporabljenih snovi in snovi, ki jih vsebujejo navedeni izdelki.
As the Court has already held, when the question referred concerns harmonisation at Community level, the national measures relating thereto must be assessed in the light of the provisions of that harmonising measure and not those of the EC Treaty (see, to that effect, Eau de Cologne & Parfümerie-Fabrik 4711, paragraph 28; Case C-37/92 Vanacker and Lesage [1993] ECR I-4947, paragraph 9, and Case C-324/99 Daimler-Chrysler [2001] ECR I-9897, paragraph 32). 15
Kot je Sodi�če že razsodilo, je treba – ko se neko vpra�anje usklajuje na ravni Skupnosti – nacionalne ukrepe, ki se nana�ajo na to uskladitev, presojati glede na določbe tega uskladitvenega ukrepa, ne pa glede na določbe Pogodbe ES (glej v tem smislu zgoraj navedeno sodbo Eau de Cologne & Parfümerie-Fabrik 4711, točka 28, in sodbi z dne 12. oktobra 1993 v zadevi Vanacker in Lesage, C-37/92, Recueil, str. I-4947, točka 9, ter z dne 13. decembra 2001 v zadevi DaimlerChrysler, C-324/99, Recueil, str. I-9897, točka 32). 15
It follows that, in order to reply to the question referred, the Court must restrict itself to the interpretation of Directive 76/768.
Iz tega sledi, da se mora Sodi�če za odgovor na predhodno vpra�anje omejiti na razlago Direktive 76/768.
Reply of the Court
Odgovor Sodišča
It should, first, be stated that, in adopting Directive 76/768, the Community legislature sought to reconcile the objective of achieving the free movement of cosmetic products and that of safeguarding public health (see Case C-169/99 Schwarzkopf [2001] ECR I-5901, paragraph 27).
Najprej je treba ugotoviti, da je normodajalec Skupnosti s sprejetjem Direk -tive 76/768 nameraval uskladiti cilj prostega pretoka kozmetičnih izdelkov s ciljem varovanja javnega zdravja (glej sodbo z dne 13. septembra 2001 v zadevi Schwarzkopf, C-169/99, Recueil, str. I-5901, točka 27).
As is clear from the second and third recitals in the preamble to Directive 76/768, the Community legislature, although finding that the differences between national laws on cosmetic products obliged Community cosmetic producers to vary their production according to the Member State for which the products were intended and that those differences impeded free movement of those products, concluded that those national provisions had the aim of safeguarding public health and that, consequently, Community harmonisation in that area must pursue the same objective.
Kot namreč izhaja iz druge in tretje uvodne izjave Direktive 76/768, je normodajalec Skupnosti sicer menil, da so razlike med nacionalnimi določbami v zvezi s kozmetičnimi izdelki proizvajalce zavezale k razlikovanju njihove proizvodnje glede na namembno državo članico in da so te razlike ovirale prosti pretok navedenih izdelkov, vendar je kljub temu ugotovil, da te nacionalne določbe sledijo cilju varovanja javnega zdravja in da mora zato uskladitev tega področja na ravni Skupnosti slediti istemu cilju.
The amendments subsequently made to Directive 76/768 were guided by those same considerations (see Schwarzkopf, paragraph 28).
Enakemu cilju so sledile tudi spremembe Direktive 76/768 (glej zgoraj navedeno sodbo Schwarzkopf, točka 28).
The rules laid down by Directive 76/768 include the obligation, laid down in Article 7(1), on Member States not to refuse, prohibit or restrict the marketing of any cosmetic products which comply with the requirements of that directive and the annexes thereto.
Med pravili, določenimi z Direktivo 76/768, je tudi obveznost, določena v njenem členu 7(1), da države članice ne smejo zavrniti, prepovedati ali omejiti trženja katerih koli kozmetičnih izdelkov, ki izpolnjujejo določbe te direktive in njenih prilog.
Next, under Article 7(3) of the directive a Member State may require, for purposes of prompt and appropriate medical treatment in the event of difficulties, that adequate and sufficient information regarding substances contained in cosmetic products be made available to the competent authority (see Case C-246/91 Commission v France [1993] ECR I-2289, paragraph 9).
Dalje je treba opozoriti, da iz člena 7(3) te direktive izhaja, da lahko država članica zahteva, da so pristojnemu organu na voljo ustrezni in zadostni podatki o snoveh, ki jih vsebujejo kozmetični izdelki, zaradi hitrega in ustreznega zdravljenja pri zdravstvenih težavah (glej sodbo z dne 5. maja 1993 v zadevi Komisija proti Franciji, C-246/91, Recueil, str. I-2289, točka 9).
That provision, which is incorporated in a directive primarily designed (according to, in particular, the second and third recitals in its preamble) to ensure freedom of trade in cosmetic products, also seeks to protect human health, within the meaning of Article 30 EC (see, to that effect, Estée Lauder, paragraph 25).
Ta določba, ume�čena v Direktivo, katere namen je med drugim – kot zlasti izhaja iz njene druge in tretje uvodne izjave – zagotoviti prosto trgovanje s kozmetičnimi izdelki, sledi tudi cilju varovanja zdravja ljudi v smislu člena 30 ES (glej v tem smislu zgoraj navedeno sodbo Estée Lauder, točka 25).
The measures which the Member States are required to take for the implementation of Article 7(3) of Directive 76/768 must however be consistent with the principle of proportionality (see, to that effect, Unilever, paragraph 27; Estée Lauder, paragraph 26, and Linhart and Biffl, paragraph 26).
Vendar pa morajo ukrepi, ki jih morajo sprejeti države članice za izvajanje člena 7(3) Direktive 76/768, spo�tovati načelo sorazmernosti (glej v tem smislu zgoraj navedene sodbe Unilever, točka 27; Estée Lauder, točka 26, ter Linhart in Biffl, točka 26).
In this instance, in the case in the main proceedings, it is clear from the national legislation that importers of cosmetic products are required to communicate to the authorities responsible for protection of health and life of humans the name or corporate name of the manufacturer, its registered office and that of the manufacturing plant and a full and detailed list of the substances contained in the product being marketed.
V obravnavani zadevi v postopku v glavni stvari iz nacionalne zakonodaje izhaja, da morajo uvozniki kozmetičnih izdelkov organom, zadolženim za varovanje zdravja in življenja ljudi, sporočiti ime ali firmo podjetja izdelovalca, njegov sedež in sedež proizvodne enote ter popoln in podroben seznam snovi, ki jih vsebujejo trženi izdelki.
That obligation to provide information allows the competent authorities, in the event of difficulties, to send to the medical services as quickly as possible the necessary information for prompt and appropriate treatment.
Ta obveznost sporočanja podatkov pristojnim organom omogoča, da v primeru zdravstvenih težav zdravstvenim službam karseda hitro sporočijo informacije, ki so nujno potrebne za hitro in ustrezno zdravljenje.
Such an obligation to provide information is proportionate to the objective of protecting human health, contained in Article 7(3) of Directive 76/768, since it ensures that the competent national authorities have at their disposal detailed information on the relevant product.
Taka obveznost sporočanja je sorazmerna s ciljem varovanja zdravja ljudi, ki je določen s členom 7(3) Direktive 76/768, ker zagotavlja, da imajo pristojni nacionalni organi na voljo podrobne informacije o zadevnem izdelku.
It is only on the basis of that information that appropriate treatment can be prescribed.
Samo na podlagi teh informacij je namreč možno določiti ustrezno zdravljenje.
Having regard to the foregoing, the reply must be that Article 7 of Directive 76/768 does not preclude a national provision which, in the interests of prompt and appropriate medical treatment in the event of difficulties, requires the importer of cosmetic products to communicate to the Ministry of Health and to the Region the name or the corporate name of the business, its registered office and that of the manufacturing plant, and a full and detailed list of the substances used and the substances contained in those products.
Ob upo�tevanju zgoraj navedenega je treba odgovoriti, da člen 7 Direktive 76/768 ne nasprotuje nacionalni določbi, ki zaradi hitrega in ustreznega zdravljenja pri zdravstvenih težavah uvoznika kozmetičnih izdelkov obvezuje, da ministrstvu za zdravje in regiji sporoči ime ali firmo podjetja, njegov sedež in sedež proizvodne enote ter popoln in podroben seznam uporabljenih snovi in snovi, ki jih vsebujejo navedeni izdelki.
Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court.
Ker je ta postopek za stranki v postopku v glavni stvari ena od stopenj v postopku pred predložitvenim sodi�čem, to odloči o stro�kih.
Article 7 of Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products, as amended by Council Directive 93/35/EEC of 14 June 1993, does not preclude a national provision which, in the interests of prompt and appropriate medical treatment in the event of difficulties, requires the importer of cosmetic products to communicate to the Ministry of Health and to the Region the name or the corporate name of the business, its registered office and that of the manufacturing plant, and a full and detailed list of the substances used and the substances contained in those products.
Člen 7 Direktive Sveta z dne 27. julija 1976 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi s kozmetičnimi izdelki 76/768/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 93/35/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993, ne nasprotuje nacionalni določbi, ki zaradi hitrega in ustreznega zdravljenja pri zdravstvenih težavah uvoznika kozmetičnih izdelkov obvezuje, da ministrstvu za zdravje in regiji sporoči ime ali firmo podjetja, njegov sedež in sedež proizvodne enote ter popoln in podroben seznam uporabljenih snovi in snovi, ki jih vsebujejo navedeni izdelki.
Case C-294/06
Zadeva C-294/06
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division))
(Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division)) „Pridružitveni sporazum EGS-Turčija – Prosto gibanje delavcev – Sklep Pridružitvenega sveta �t.
(EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Freedom of movement for workers — Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council — First indent of Article 6(1) — Worker duly registered as belonging to the labour force — Leave to enter as a student or as an au pair — Effect on the right to remain)
1/80 – Člen 6(1), prva alinea – Delavec, vključen v zakoniti trg dela – Dovoljenje za vstop kot �tudent ali oseba ‚au-pair‘ – Vpliv na pravico do prebivanja“
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 24 January 2008 . . . . . . .
Kokott, predstavljeni 18. julija 2007 Sodba Sodi�ča (tretji senat) z dne 24. januarja 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International agreements — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Freedom of movement for persons — Workers — Right of Turkish nationals to an extension of their leave to remain
Mednarodni sporazumi – Pridružitveni sporazum EGS-Turčija – Prosto gibanje oseb – Delavci – Pravica turških državljanov do podaljšanja dovoljenja za prebivanje
(EEC-Turkey Association Council Decision No 1/80, Art. 6(1))
(Sklep št. 1/80 Pridružitvenega sveta EGS-Turčija, člen 6(1))
The fact that a Turkish national was granted leave to enter the territory of a Member State as an au pair or as a student cannot deprive him of the status of ‘worker’ and prevent him from being regarded as ‘duly registered as belonging to the labour force’ of that Member State within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC-Turkey Association Council.
Dejstvo, da je bilo tur�kemu državljanu dovoljeno vstopiti na ozemlje države članice kot osebi „aupair“ ali �tudentu, ne more odvzeti temu državljanu statusa „delavca“ in mu preprečiti vključitve v „zakoniti trg dela“ te države članice v smislu člena 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80 Pridružitvenega sveta EGS-Turčija.
Accordingly, that fact cannot prevent that national from being able to rely on that provision for the purposes of obtaining renewed permission to work and a corollary right of residence.
To torej navedenemu državljanu ne more preprečiti, da bi se za podalj�anje svojega delovnega dovoljenja in za pridobitev z njim povezane pravice do prebivanja skliceval na to določbo.
In order to determine whether Turkish nationals meet the conditions laid down in Article 6(1) of the decision in question, no account is to be taken of the aim pursued in permitting the persons concerned to enter the Member State in question, since that article does not make recognition of the rights which it confers on Turkish workers subject to any condition connected with the reason for which the right to enter, work or reside was initially granted.
V teh okoli�činah ni mogoče sprejeti trditve, da bi lahko �tudent ali oseba „aupair“ ob�la zakonodajo države članice gostiteljice, da bi postopoma pridobila neomejeno pravico dostopa do trga dela v tej državi, ker zadevne osebe samo izvr�ujejo pravico, ki je izrecno predvidena s Sklepom �t. 1/80.