natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To lessen this fear and encourage informing, various kinds of protection are offered: protec- tion against dismissal (97), non-liability for financial damage caused by informing (98), non-disclosure of the proposal takes account of the recommendations of the Court of Auditors and aims at improving the governance and the eectiveness of OLAF, and procedural laws. e proposal was transmitted to the Parliament and the Council for examination under the co-decision procedure.
pred odpustom (97), neodgovornost za finančno škodo, povzročeno s prijavo (98), nerazkritje identitete informa- torja (99), na prošnjo zaščita s strani varuha človekovih pravic (100). Tudi običajno delovno pravo lahko zagotavlja določeno zaščito: obvezna obrazložitev odločitev, ki so
A proposal for a regulation amending the regulation on
Predlog spremembe uredbe o medsebojni pomoči na kmetij- jo svoje zaposlene pred vsako obliko nepravičnosti ali na-
(99) Ireland and Finland.(100) Belgium, Flemish Community.
(87 (88 decembra 2006, predlaga razširitev carinskega informacijskega sistema (109), da bi omogočili uporabo tega sistema v nacionalnih sistemih analize za usmerjanje kontrole blaga in uskladitvenih ukrepov na ravni Skupnosti.
(101) Denmark and Latvia.(102) France and Austria.
Gre za področje, na katerem je treba stalno izboljševati instrumente ali uvajati novosti, ker v nasprotnem primeru narašča kriminal.
) Czech Republic, Luxembourg, Portugal, Slovenia and Slovakia.
Namen predloga je okrepiti operativno sodelovanje na carinskem področju in zagotavljati vmesnik med carinskimi organi, regionalnimi in mednarodnimi organizacijami (Interpol, WCO (110), Europol itd.) ter organi in
Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Oce (OLAF), COM(2006) 244 nal.
(105) Latvija in Avstrija.(106) Predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1073/1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljujam (OLAF), COM(2006) 244 konč.
the internal audit unit.)
Belgija (Flamska regija), Irska (na področju kmetijstva) in Malta.
Denmark, Lithuania (‘irregularities inspector’), Hungary (‘person responsible for irregularities within the organisation’) and Austria (an ocial responsible for combating corruption).) Denmark, Italy.)
Danska, Litva („nadzornik nepravilnosti“), Madžarska („oseba, pristojna za nepravilnosti znotraj organizacije“), Avstrija (uradnik, pristojen za boj proti korupciji).) Danska, Italija.)
France, Italy and Slovakia.
Francija, Italija, Slovaška.
In Greece, civil servants must report oences to the public prosecutor’s oce.)
V Grčiji mora uradnik, ki ugotovi nepravilnost, s tem takoj seznaniti državno tožilstvo.)
Latvia, Malta and Poland.) e Netherlands and Portugal (disciplinary authority).) Belgium.) Germany and Slovenia.)
Latvija, Malta, Poljska.) Nizozemska, Portugalska (disciplinski organ).) Belgija.)
In Germany, Lower Saxony and Hanover already have such a system and a
Češka republika, Latvija, Avstrija, Portugalska in Združeno kraljestvo.)
(95 (96 mutual assistance between the administrative authorities of the Member States and cooperation between the latter and the Commission to ensure the correct application of the law on customs and agricultural matters, OJ L 82, 22.3.1997.
pomoči med upravnimi organi držav članic in o sodelovanju med njimi in Komisijo zaradi zagotavljanja pravilnega izvajanja carinske in kmetijske zakonodaje, UL L 82, 22.3.1997.
ANNUAL REPORT 2006 FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS FIGHT AGAINST FRAUD e United Kingdom is now the only Member State which has not signed up to the agreement. e agreement provides for an eective system to combat cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting.
LETNO POROČILO 2006 POROČILO KOMISIJE O ZAŠČITI FINANČNIH INTERESOV SKUPNOSTI BOJ PROTI GOLJUFIJAM agencijami Evropske unije.
It provides for the creation of a customs le identication database (111) and a European central directory of data from the principal service providers worldwide for the international carriage of goods and containers (112).
Predvideva oblikovanje identi- kacijske podatkovne baze carinskih datotek (111) in centralne evropske podatkovne baze za podatke najpomembnejših ponudnikov storitev v sektorju mednarodnega prevoza blaga in zlasti prevoza z zabojniki (112).
It establishes a legal basis for the management of a permanent infrastructure for coordinating joint customs surveillance operations, making it possible for representatives or liaison ocers of the Member States to be hosted at OLAF during the operational phase.
Ustvarja tudi pravno podlago za upravljanje stalne infrastrukture usklajevanja skupnih carinskih nadzornih dejavnosti, ki omogoča, da OLAF med operativno fazo gosti predstavnike ali uradnike za zvezo iz držav članic.
Under the agreement, approximately USD 1 billion will be paid over a period of 12 years to the European Communities and the 10 Member States that signed the agreement in July 2004.
V okviru tega sporazuma bodo Evropska skupnost in deset držav članic, ki so bile podpisnice sporazuma julija 2004, prejele približno eno milijardo dolarjev v obdobju dvanajstih let.
Between the signing of the agreement and the end of 2006 PMI paid out approximately USD 425 million.
Med podpisom sporazuma in koncem leta 2006 je PMI nakazal skoraj 425 milijonov dolarjev.
In October 2006, the original 10 signatory Member States and the Commission, acting for the EC, conrmed their agreement on the distribution of these payments. e amount paid into the Community budget is 9.7 % of the amount received, the rest being transferred to the Member States’ budgets.
Oktobra 2006 so deset prvotnih držav članic podpisnic in Komisija v imenu ES potrdile dogovor o razdelitvi teh plačil. Znesek, ki je bil plačan v proračun Skupnosti, znaša 9,70 % prejetega zneska, preostanek je bil nakazan v proračune držav članic.
Protecting the euro e Commission continued to coordinate the eorts of the Member States to protect the euro against counterfeiting in close cooperation with Europol and the European Central Bank.
Komisija je nadaljevala usklajevanje prizadevanj držav članic za zaščito eura pred ponarejanjem v tesnem sodelovanju z Europolom in Evropsko centralno banko.
An amended proposal adopted in September 2006 (113) aims to establish a new, more complete and multidisciplinary mutual administrative assistance framework for the protection of the nancial interests of the European Communities against fraud and any other illegal activities.
Namen spremenjenega predloga, sprejetega septembra 2006 (113), je vzpostaviti nov popolnejši in interdisciplinarni okvir medsebojne pomoči za zaščito nančnih interesov Skupnosti pred goljujami in drugimi oblikami nezakonitega ravnanja.
In 2006, six more Member States (114
V ta namen države članice in Komisija sodelujejo, usklajujejo in si pomagajo ter izmenjujejo informacije, da se omogočijo hitre preiskave in ustrezno ravnanje.
) signed up to the agreement concluded in 2004 between the Commission,
Namen tega predloga ni podeliti Komisiji lastna preiskovalna pooblastila, ampak dati državam članicam na razpolago njeno pomoč (storitvena platforma) za primere čezmejnih goljuj, kot so goljuje v obliki davčnega vrtiljaka v zvezi z DDV.
OLAF also manages the Pericles action programme for exchanges, assistance and training intended to protect the euro against counterfeiting (117). is programme co-nances transnational and multidisciplinary projects.
OLAF upravlja tudi akcijski program Pericles na področju izmenjave, pomoči in usposabljanja za zaščito eura proti ponarejanju (117).
It is intended to raise awareness among the staff concerned with the Community dimension of the euro, to bring the structures and staff concerned closer together and to develop a climate of mutual trust, to achieve similar high standards of training for trainers and to expand general knowledge, particularly with regard to relevant Community and international law and instruments.
Ta program sonancira nadnacionalne in interdisciplinarne projekte za ozaveščanje zadevnega osebja o pomenu eura na ravni Skupnosti, spodbujanje tesnejšega sodelovanja med strukturami in zadevnim osebjem ter razvijanja ozračja medsebojnega zaupanja, pospeševanje zbliževanja dejavnosti usposabljanja na visoki ravni za inštruktorje in širitev splošnega znanja, zlasti o ustrezni zakonodaji Skupnosti in mednarodni zakonodaji ter instrumentih.
In 2006, 12 projects were launched, including nine proposed by the competent authorities of the Member States and three by the Commission/OLAF.
Leta 2006 se je začelo izvajati dvanajst projektov, od katerih so jih devet predlagali pristojni organi držav članic, tri pa Komisija/OLAF.
In view of its success, the programme was extended to the
Zaradi uspešnosti je bil program podaljšan do konca leta
Netherlands, Portugal and Finland.
(118) Sklep Sveta 849/2006 z dne 20. novembra 2006 o spremembah in podaljšanju
) With Bulgaria and Romania, which joined the agreement in March extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an action programme for exchanges, assistance and training, is intended to protect the euro against counterfeiting (Pericles programme).
Sklepa 2001/923/ES o vzpostavitvi programa izmenjave, pomoči in usposabljanja za zaščito eura proti ponarejanju (program „Perciles“).
2007, the number is 26.
Z Romunijo in Bolgarijo, ki sta k sporazumu pristopili marca 2007, je pogodbenic šestindvajset.
ANNUAL REPORT 2006 FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS FIGHT AGAINST FRAUD e Czech Government adopted a resolution on the anticorruption strategy for 2006–11.
LETNO POROČILO 2006 POROČILO KOMISIJE O ZAŠČITI FINANČNIH INTERESOV SKUPNOSTI BOJ PROTI GOLJUFIJAM da so sprejele ukrepe za okrepitev solidarne odgovornosti v primeru neplačila DDV (119
Some Member States adopted bilateral agreements on mutual assistance in customs matters with other Member
Češka vlada je sprejela resolucijo o strategiji boja proti korupciji za obdobje 2006–2011.
Several Member States stated that they had adopted new laws to combat VAT fraud in 2006. In Denmark, stricter rules are now applied for the activation of guarantees and liquidation of companies involved in carousel-type fraud.
Nekatere države članice so sporočile, da so leta 2006 sklenile dvostranske sporazume o medsebojni pomoči na carinskem področju z drugimi državami članicami ali tretjimi državami (120).
) Belgium and Denmark with regard to the liability of company directors, and Spain regarding the joint liability of consortia.
) Belgija in Danska za odgovornost direktorjev podjetij, Španija o solidarni odgovornosti skupin podjetij.)
Spain, and Slovakia with Slovenia, Albania and Israel.
Belgija je podpisala sporazuma z Belorusijo in Kongom, Portugalska s Španijo, Slovaška s Slovenijo in Albanija z Izraelom.
Recovery
Za preostalih 114 primerov je treba še potrditi obračune.
– 55 cases totalling EUR 128.6 million in which the clearance of accounts procedure is still ongoing but should be completed in 2007.
– V 55 primerih v skupni vrednosti 128,6 milijona EUR postopek potrditve obračunov še poteka in bi se moral končati v letu 2007.
In 2002, the Commission announced the setting-up of a Task Force Recovery (TFR) to examine the considerable backlog of recovery cases concerning the EAGGF Guarantee Section.
Komisija je leta 2002 napovedala vzpostavitev „projektne skupine za izterjavo“ (Task Force Recouvrement – TFR), da bi analizirali velike zaostanke pri obravnavi primerov izterjav na področju Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS.
In addition, on 13 October 2006, the Commission adopted a decision (122) concerning EUR 6 653 487 for 50 cases concerning Belgium, Germany, Ireland, France, the Netherlands, Portugal and the United Kingdom. is sum was charged to the Community budget as the Member States had shown due diligence in their recovery eorts.
Poleg tega je Komisija 13. oktobra 2006 sprejela odloč- bo (122) glede 6 653 487 EUR za 50 primerov v zvezi z Belgijo, Nemčijo, Irsko, Francijo, Nizozemsko, Portugalsko in Združenim kraljestvom. Ta znesek je bil vpisan v breme proračuna Skupnosti, ker so si države članice skrbno prizadevale za izterjavo.
(b) Cases involving less than EUR 500 000 each.
Stanje dela TFR na dan 31. decembra 2006 je mogoče povzeti, kot sledi.
e Agriculture and Rural Development Directorate- General and OLAF’s joint TFR was responsible for 463 cases involving more than EUR 500 000 each and 3 227 cases involving less than EUR 500 000 each, following an irregularity reported to the Commission prior to 1999. e situation with regard to TFR’s work at 31 December 2006 can be summarised as follows.
b) Primeri, ki posamezno ne presegajo 500 000 EUR a) Primeri, ki posamezno znašajo 500 000 EUR ali več
(a) Cases involving more than EUR 500 000 each.
S to odločbo so se zaključili naslednji primeri na seznamu dolžnikov:
Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 introduced an automatic clearance mechanism for irregular payments not recovered within four years of the primary administrative or judicial nding or within eight years where recovery action is taken in the national courts.
Uredba (ES) št. 1290/2005 je uvedla avtomatični mehanizem potrditve obračunov za nepravilna plačila, če do izterjave ni prišlo v štirih letih od datuma prve upravne ali sodne ugotovitve ali v osmih letih, če je izterjava v postopku pred nacionalnimi sodnimi organi.
In that case, 50 % of the nancial consequences of nonrecovery are borne by the Member State in question and 50 % by the Community budget.
Zadev- na država članica krije 50 % finančnih posledic zara- di neizterjave, ostalih 50 % pa je kritih iz proračuna Skupnosti.
– 41 cases involving EUR 176 million, charged to the Community budget because the Member States had taken all necessary measures, which meant that the nonrecovery could not be attributed to them;
– 41 primerov v skupni vrednosti 176 milijonov EUR, ki bremenijo proračun Skupnosti, ker so države članice sprejele vse potrebne ukrepe in se zato neizterjava ne more pripisati njim;
– 164 cases involving EUR 317 million, charged to the relevant Member States as a result of negligence on their part in the recovery procedure; e new mechanism has been in operation since 16 October 2006 and covers all cases of nonrecovery open at that date, including the 114 cases referred to above and cases reported by the Member States before 31 December 1998 involving less than EUR 500 000 each.
– 164 primerov v skupni vrednosti 317 milijonov EUR, ki bremenijo zadevne države članice zaradi njihove malomarnosti v postopku izterjave;
– 144 cases involving approximately EUR 402 million, removed from the debtors’ list as non-cases or double entries.
– 144 primerov v skupni vrednosti 402 milijonov EUR se je črtalo s seznama dolžnikov, ker so bili primeri zaključeni ali vpisani dvakrat.
Clearance has yet to take place for the 114 cases remaining:
Ta novi mehanizem se uporablja od 16. oktobra 2006 in pokriva vse do tega datuma še nerešene primere neizterjave, vključno s 114 zgoraj navedenimi primeri in primeri, ki so jih države članice sporočile pred 31. decembrom 1998 in posamezno ne presegajo 500 000 EUR.
– 59 cases, involving EUR 111.9 million, in which the Commission found that the Member States concerned
Zato se za vse nepravilnosti, storjene pred letom 2003 (ali 1999, če je bila izterjava v postopku pred nacionalnimi sodnimi organi), za katere do 16. oktobra 2006 ni prišlo do izterjave, obračuni lahko potrdijo v letu 2007 ob uporabi pravila izterjave 50 %-50 %.
(122) C(2006) 4801.(123) Commission Decision 2007/327/EC of 27 April 2007 (OJ L 122,
Komisija je to pravilo prvič uporabila v odločbi o potrditvi obračunov, sprejeti aprila 2007 (123).
) Commission Decision 2006/678/EC of 3 October 2006 (OJ L 278, 10.10.2006, p. 24).
) Odločba Komisije 2006/678/ES z dne 3. oktobra 2006, UL L 278, 10.10.2006, str. 24.
ANNUAL REPORT 2006 FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS FIGHT AGAINST FRAUD cial impact of approximately EUR 1.452 billion (128) for the
LETNO POROČILO 2006 POROČILO KOMISIJE O ZAŠČITI FINANČNIH INTERESOV SKUPNOSTI BOJ PROTI GOLJUFIJAM
Community contribution.
Službe Komisije so začele usklajevanje, da bi zaključile te primere.
Of these cases, 5 488 have been closed denitively at Commission level and the amount of EUR 600 million was taken into account during nal payment.
Države članice so za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 do sedaj sporočile 8 733 primerov nepravilnosti s nančnim učinkom približno 1,156 milijarde EUR na prispevek Skupnosti.
In addition to the recovery activity described above, the Commission also excluded certain expenditure incurred by Member States’ approved paying agencies from nanc-ing under the EAGGF Guarantee Section, because they were not in conformity with Community rules.
Poleg zgoraj opisane dejavnosti izterjave je Komisija iz -nanciranja Jamstvenega sklada EKUJS izključila tudi nekatere izdatke plačilnih organov, odobrenih s strani držav članic, zaradi njihove neskladnosti s pravili Skupnosti.
Following checks and bilateral meetings between the Commission and the competent authorities of 13 Member States, the Commission excluded expenditure of some EUR 575.5 million from European nancing in three 2006 decisions (124).
Komisija je po preverjanjih in dvostranskih srečanjih s pristojnimi organi trinajstih držav članic s tremi odločbami iz leta 2006 (124) iz evropskega nanciranja izključila približno 575,5 milijona EUR izdatkov.
e Commission also excluded expenditure of more than EUR 500 000 from Community nancing with regard to
Komisija je iz nanciranja Skupnosti izključila tudi več kot pol milijona EUR izdatkov agencij Sapard iz dveh
Concerning the 2000–06 programming period, the Member States have so far communicated 8 733 cases of irregularities with a financial impact of approximately EUR 1.156 billion for the Community contribution.
Na področju strukturnih skladov izterjavo zneskov, ki so bili nepravilno plačani zaradi nepravilnosti ali goljuje, zagotavljajo države članice.
Member States have informed the Commission that administrative and/or judicial procedures have been concluded at national level for 3 686 of these and that some EUR 345 million has been recovered.
Leta 2006 so nančni popravki za programski obdobji 1994–1999 in 2000–2006 znašali 502 milijonov EUR oziroma 521 milijonov EUR. Ti nančni popravki so posledica revizij, ki sta jih opravila Komisija in Računsko sodišče, in postopka zaključevanja programov iz obdobja 1994–1999.
In the area of the Structural Funds, the recovery of unduly paid amounts due to irregularity or fraud is carried out by Member States. e recovery of those amounts at Commission level can be done by reduction or cancellation of the nancial contribution with the possibility of a transfer of funds to other operations.
Vključujejo uradne odločitve o finančnem popravku zaradi odkritja nepravilnosti, prenehanja obveznosti ob zaključku programa, ki se konča z zmanjšanjem nanciranja Skupnosti, ker država članica ni prijavila zadostnih upravičenih izdatkov, in povračila zneskov, izterjanih po koncu sodnih postopkov, ki so tekli v času zaključevanja programov.
In 2006, the nancial correction gure was EUR 502 million for the 1994–99 programming period and EUR 521 million for the 2000–06 period. e nancial corrections are the result of audits by the Commission and the Court of Auditors and the closure procedure for programmes from the 1994–99 period. ey consist of ocial nancial correction decisions following the detection of an irregularity, decommitments on programme closure resulting in a reduction in Community nancing because the Member State did not declare sucient eligible expenditure, and reimbursement of amounts recovered following the completion of court cases still pending when the programmes in question were closed. e gures do not include nancial corrections that did not result in recovery, such as corrections made when a Member State detected an irregularity or accepted the nancial correction proposed by the Commission and the irregular amount was reallocated to another project.
Ti zneski ne vključujejo nančnih popravkov, ki se ne končajo z izterjavo, na primer nančnih popravkov, ki se izvedejo, če je država članica odkrila nepravilnost ali sprejela nančni popravek, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, in je bil nepravilni znesek prerazporejen v drug projekt.
Own resources e programmes co-nanced by the Structural Funds are multiannual and based on interim payments.
Programi, ki jih sonancirajo strukturni skladi, so večletni in delujejo na podlagi vmesnih plačil.
Recovery of amounts unduly paid may take place before or aer conclusion of the programme.
Nepravilno plačani zneski se lahko izterjajo pred zaključkom programa ali po njem.
For the 1994–99 programming period, the deadline for presentation of the request for nal payment to the Commission was 31 March 2003.
Za programsko obdobje 1994–1999 je bil rok za vložitev zahtevka za končno plačilo Komisiji 31. marec 2003.
e Member States must recover established amounts relating to irregularity cases registered in the Ownres system.
Države članice morajo izterjati ugotovljene zneske za primer nepravilnosti, registriran v sistemu Ownres.
On 30 March 2007, the recovery rate for cases communicated in 2006 was 32 % (approximately EUR 113 million).
Na dan 30. marca 2007 je bila stopnja izterjave za primere, sporočene leta 2006, 32 % (približno 113 milijonov EUR).
In the 1994–99 programming period, the Member States communicated 11 573 cases of irregularities with a nan-
Države članice so za programsko obdobje 1994–1999 poročale o 11 573 primerih nepravilnosti s nančnim učin-
) Decisions 2006/334/EC, 2006/554/EC and 2006/932/EC, OJ L 124, 11.5.2006, OJ L 218, 9.8.2006 and OJ L 355, 15.12.2006.)
) Odločbe 2006/334/ES, 2006/554/ES in 2006/932/ES, UL L 124, 11.5.2006, UL L 218, 9.8.2006 in UL L 355, 15.12.2006.)
Commission Decisions C(2005)3702 and C(2006)2405, not published in the Ocial Journal.
Odločbi Komisije C(2005)3702 in C(2006)2405, še neobjavljeni v UL.) Gre za večletne programe.
) Situation according to the data contained in the ECR database at 18 projects directly nanced under the Structural Funds and projects co-nanced under the Cohesion Fund.) OJ L 178, 12.7.1994.
Ta številka ne zajema neposrednih projektov, ki se nancirajo v okviru strukturnih skladov, niti projektov, ki jih sonancira Kohezijski sklad.) UL L 178, 12.7.1994.)
the claim fall under dierent Community funds; in this case osetting is only possible in half of the Member
13 1 mogoč v skoraj vseh pravnih sistemih (
Within the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF, osetting a debt and a claim relating to dierent agricultural sectors is possible under nearly all the national legal systems (131).
Kar zadeva struk- turne sklade in Kohezijski sklad, je pobot na splošno ome-
It is possible between dierent programming periods in just 10
V samo desetih državah članicah ( mogoč pobot med različnimi programi.
Moreover, certain Member States were held nancially responsible for a total of some EUR 33.4 million because they did not establish customs debts where they should have.
Prav tako deset držav članic dovoljuje pobot med različnimi programskimi
In four Member States, osetting is possible even where the recovery and the payment do not
V štirih državah članicah je pobot mogoč, če- obdobji ( prav izterjava in plačilo nista v pristojnosti iste plačilne
In most Member States a Community debt and a national
V večini držav članic je mogoče izvesti pobot med dolgom
In 2006, almost EUR 114 million was recovered following OLAF investigations.
Preglednica 4: Izterjava po preiskavi, ki jo je izvedel OLAF
Recovery 2006 (million EUR)
Izterjava v letu 2006
) However, in some Member States (Czech Republic, Greece,
Tako je na primer v zadnjih treh letih izterjava s pobotom znašala 75 do 90 % vseh javnih sredstev, izterjanih na področju kmetijstva na Irskem, 73 do 94 % v sektorju premij za živali v Franciji, približno 90 % na področju kmetijstva v Avstriji, več kot 50 % na področju kmetijstva in 21 do 93 % za Evropski socialni sklad na Švedskem (136).
Luxembourg, Hungary and Malta) osetting is limited to the agricultural sector.
Te številke zajemajo nacionalna sredstva, vendar znaten del predstavljajo evropska sredstva, ki so bila izterjana na ta način.