natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The contracting authority can then reward better performing equipment by stating in the award criteria that, when evaluating the tenders, extra points will be awarded for equipment that uses less kW/h than the minimum amount.
Naročnik lahko nagradi učinkovitejšo čistilno opremo tako, da v merilih za ocenjevanje navede, da bodo pri ocenjevanju ponudb dodatne točke dodeljene za opremo, ki porabi manj kWh od določene minimalne količine.
It follows from the Court ruling in this case, and from Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC, which specifically refer to this ruling in their first recital, that all award criteria should meet four conditions.
Iz odločitve sodišča v tej zadevi ter iz direktiv 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES, ki se posebej sklicujeta na to odločitev v svojem uvodu, sledi, da morajo vsa merila za ocenjevanje izpolnjevati štiri pogoje.
Award criteria must have a link to the subject matter of the contract
Merila za ocenjevanje morajo biti povezana s predmetom naročila
This is essential.
Ta pogoj je najpomembnejši.
It ensures that award criteria relate to the needs of the contracting authority, as defined in the subject of the contract.
Zagotavlja, da se merila za ocenjevanje nanašajo na naročnikove potrebe, kot so opredeljene v predmetu naročila.
The procurement directives (2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC) explicitly allow environmental considerations to be included in award criteria.
Direktivi o javnih naročilih 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES izrecno dovoljujeta vključitev okoljskih vidikov v merila za ocenjevanje.
This legislation builds on Court of Justice case-law.
Ta zakonodaja gradi na sodni praksi Sodišča.
The basic rule on environmental award criteria was laid down in Case C-513/99 (Concordia Bus) (1).
Osnovno pravilo o okoljskih merilih za ocenjevanje je bilo določeno v zadevi C-513/99 (Concordia Bus) (1).
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-513/99.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi C-513/99.
The presence of a link in the Concordia Bus case
V zadevi Concordia Bus je Sodišče menilo, da merila za ocenjevanje, ki se nanašajo na raven emisij dušikovega oksida in na raven hrupa avtobusov, uporabljenih za prevoze, izpolnjujejo zahtevo glede povezanosti s predmetom naročila.
In 1997; the Community of Helsinki, Finland, decided to put their bus services out to tender.
Leta 1997 se je občina Helsinki na Finskem odločila, da objavi razpis za avtobusne storitve.
They used award criteria such as overall price, quality of the bus fleet and operational quality.
Uporabili so merila za ocenjevanje, kot so skupna cena, kakovost avtobusov in operativna kakovost.
In the Concordia Bus case, the Court considered that award criteria relating to the level of nitrogen oxide emissions and the noise level of the buses, to be used to provide the transport service, did meet the requirement of being linked to the subject matter of the contract.
V poznejši sodbi, „zadevi Wienstrom“ (2), je Sodišče dalo dodatne informacije o tem, kako je treba oč ni ko ek rir razlagati povezavo s predmetom naročila.
Under one award criterion, companies could score extra points if they could comply with certain emission and noise levels.
Na podlagi enega od meril za ocenjevanje so podjetja lahko pridobila dodatne točke, če so izpolnjevala določene ravni emisij in hrupa.
On the basis of these extra points, the contract was awarded to HKL, which is the municipal transport company.
Na podlagi teh dodatnih točk je bilo naročilo oddano podjetju HKL, ki je občinsko prevozno podjetje.
Judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-448/01.
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi C-448/01.
Concordia Bus, a competitor who did not get the contract, opposed this decision, arguing that the emission and noise levels could not be used as award criteria as they did not bring any economic advantage to the contracting authority.
Concordia Bus, ponudnik, ki ni dobil naročila, je nasprotoval tej odločitvi s trditvijo, da ravni emisij in hrupa ni mogoče uporabiti kot meril za ocenjevanje, saj naročniku ne prinesejo nobene ekonomske koristi.
The Court of Justice provided further clarification in the Wienstrom case.
Sodišče je v zadevi Wienstrom zagotovilo dodatno pojasnilo.
The absence of a link in the Wienstrom case
Odsotnost povezave v zadevi Wienstrom
The clarity and objectivity of the award criteria in the Wienstrom case
Jasnost in objektivnost meril za ocenjevanje v zadevi Wienstrom
In this case, the Court of Justice ruled that in a tender for the supply of energy a criterion relating solely to the amount of electricity produced from renewable sources in excess of the expected consumption of the contracting authority (which was the subject of the contract) could not be considered as being linked to the subject matter of the contract (1).
V tej zadevi je Sodišče odločilo, da v razpisu za dobavo energije merilo, ki se nanaša izključno na količino električne energije, pridobljene iz obnovljivih virov, ki presega pričakovano porabo naročnika (kar je bil predmet naročila), ni mogoče šteti za povezano s predmetom naročila (1).
In the Wienstrom case, the Court of Justice found that, in order to give tenderers equal opportunities in formulating the terms of their tenders, the contracting authority has to formulate its award criteria in such a way that ‘all reasonably well-informed tenderers of normal diligence interpret them in the same way’ (3).
) Vseeno je treba poudariti, da je Sodišče istočasno priznalo možnost merila za oddajo, povezanega s količino električne energije iz obnovljivih virov energije (kot del električne energije, dejansko dobavljene naročniku).
Another element of the necessary clarity and measurability of the award criteria as formulated by the Court of Justice was that the contracting authority should only set criteria against which the information provided by the tenderers can actually be verified. ed.
Poleg tega je tudi navedlo, da utež 45 %, dodeljena temu merilu, naročniku ne bi preprečila potrebne sintetične ocene meril za oddajo za določitev ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe.
time recognised the possibility of an award criterion related to the amount of electricity stemming from renewable energy sources (as part of the electricity effectively supplied to the contracting authority).
V zadevi Wienstrom je Sodišče ugotovilo, da mora naročnik za to, da bi vsem ponudnikom zagotovil enake možnosti pri oblikovanju pogojev svojih ponudb, oblikovati svoja merila za ocenjevanje tako, da„si jih vsi razmeroma dobro obveščeni in običajno skrbni ponudniki razlagajo enako“ (3).
Further, it has also stated that a weighing of 45 % attributed to this criterion would not prevent the contracting authority from making the necessary synthetic evaluation of the award criteria in order to identify the economically most advantageous offer.
Drug element potrebne jasnosti in merljivosti meril za ocenjevanje, kot ga je navedlo Sodišče, je, da mora naročnik določiti samo merila, v zvezi s katerimi je mogoče informacije, ki jih zagotovijo ponudniki, dejansko preveriti.
Award criteria must be specific and objectively quantifiable able
Merila za ocenjevanje morajo biti specična in objektivno merljiva
In this case, the contracting authority did not determine the specific supply period during which the tenderers should state the amount that could be supplied by them.
V tem primeru naročnik ni določil specifičnega roka dobave, v katerem bi morali ponudniki navesti količino, ki bi jo lahko dobavili.
Award criteria must have been advertised previously
Merila za ocenjevanje morajo biti predhodno objavljena e zeleno!
The Court of Justice ruled that, based on its previous judgments, award criteria must never confer unrestricted freedom of choice on contracting authorities.
Sodišče je na podlagi svojih predhodnih sodb odločilo, da merila za ocenjevanje ne smejo naročniku nikoli dati neomejene svobode izbire.
They must restrict this freedom of choice by setting specific, product-related and measurable criteria, or, as the Court of Justice put it, ‘adequately specific and objectively quantifiable’ criteria.
To svobodo izbire morajo omejiti z določitvijo specifičnih in merljivih meril ter meril, povezanih s proizvodom, ali kot se je izrazilo Sodišče, z „dovolj specifičnimi in objektivno merljivimi“ merili.
According to the public procurement directives, contract notices will have to mention whether the contracting authority will award the contract on the basis of ‘lowest price’ or ‘economically most advantageous tender’.
V skladu z vsemi direktivami o javnih naročilih morajo obvestila o javnem naročilu navesti, ali bo naročnik oddal naročilo na podlagi „najnižje cene“ ali „ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe“.
In the latter case, the criteria used to identify the economically most advantageous tender shall be mentioned in the notice or, at least in any case, in the tender documents.
V zadnjem primeru se merila za določitev ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe navedejo v obvestilu ali vsaj v vsakem primeru v razpisni dokumentaciji.
In the Concordia Bus case, before evaluation of the tenders, the Community of Helsinki had speci-
V zadevi Concordia Bus je občina Helsinki pred oceno ponudb določila in objavila sistem za dodelitev dodatnih točk za
Award criteria must respect Community law f i fied and published a system for awarding extra points for certain levels of noise and emission (2).
Merila za ocenjevanje morajo upoštevati zakonodajo Skupnosti določene ravni hrupa in emisij (2).
This system was considered by the Court of Jus- tice to be adequately specific and measurable.
Sodišče je menilo, da je bil ta sistem dovolj specifičen in merljiv.
) In this case, extra points were awarded among other things, for
Zadnji pogoj, ki izhaja iz Pogodbe ES in navedenih direktiv o javnih naročilih, je, da morajo biti merila za ocenjevanje v skladu z vsemi temeljnimi načeli zakonodaje Skupnosti.
‘the use of buses with nitrogen oxide emissions below 4 g/kWh (+ 2.5 points/bus) or below 2 g/kWh (+ 3.5 points/bus) and with external noise levels below 77 dB (+1 point/bus)’.
Sodišče je izrecno navedlo pomen načela nediskriminacije, ki je osnova za druga načela, kot sta svoboda opravljanja storitev in svoboda ustanavljanja.
The distinction between specificity and discrimination in the Concordia Bus case
Razlika med specičnostjo in diskriminacijo v zadevi Concordia Bus
The issue of discrimination was expressly raised in the Concordia Bus case.
V zadevi Concordia Bus je bilo izrecno odprto vprašanje diskriminacije.
One of the objections of Concordia Bus was that the criteria set by the Community of Helsinki were discriminatory because the Community’s own bus company HKL was the only company with gas-powered vehicles that could comply with these emission levels.
Eden od ugovorov družbe Concordia Bus je bil, da so bila merila, ki jih je določila občina Helsinki, diskriminacijska, saj je bilo občinsko avtobusno podjetje, tj. HKL, edino podjetje z vozili na plinski pogon, ki so lahko izpolnjevala te ravni emisij.
The Court of Justice ruled that the fact that one of the award criteria set by the contracting authority could only be satisfied by a small number of companies did not in itself make this discriminatory.
Sodišče je odločilo, da zaradi dejstva, da je enega od meril za ocenjevanje, ki jih je določil naročnik, lahko izpolnjevalo le majhno število podjetij, naročilo ni bilo diskriminacijsko.
Therefore, when determining whether there has been discrimination, all the facts of the case must be taken into account (1).
Pri odločanju, ali je šlo za diskriminacijo, je torej treba upoštevati vsa dejstva v zadevi (1).
One of these facts in this case was that the complainant, Concordia Bus, was awarded a different lot in which the same requirement of gas-powered vehicles was applied.
Pooblaščeni inštitut Združenega kraljestva za nakupe in oskrbo predlaga, da bi moralo izračunavanje stroškov celotnega življenjskega ciklusa zajemati: č an ju o
The UK Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply suggests that whole life costing should cover:
• nakup in vse povezane stroške (dostava, namestitev, usposobitev za zagon itd.),
At the award stage of a procurement procedure, the price of a tender is always one of the most influential factors.
V fazi oddaje v postopku javnih naročil je cena v ponudbi vedno eden od najvplivnejših dejavnikov.
But how do you define the price?
Vendar kako določiti ceno?
• purchase and all associated costs (delivery, installation, commissioning, etc.),
• obratovalne stroške, vključno z energijo, nadomestnimi deli in vzdrževanjem, o lju prijaznem – ja
• operating costs, including energy, spares, and maintenance,
• stroške konca življenjske dobe, kot so umik iz obratovanja in odstranitev.
– A handbook on environmental public procurement
Več informacij na: http://www.cips.org/ em – o k ol oš k
When you buy a product, service or work, you always pay a price.
Za proizvod, storitev ali gradnjo vedno plačate neko ceno.
But the purchase price is just one of the cost elements in the whole process of procuring, owning and disposing.
Toda nakupna cena je samo eden od stroškovnih elementov v celotnem procesu naročanja, uporabe in odstranjevanja.
To assess the whole cost of a contract, you need to look at all the different stages.
Če želite oceniti celoten strošek ponujenega, morate upoštevati vse različne faze.
This is known as the ‘lifecycle costing’ approach.
To je znano kot pristop „izračunavanja stroškov življenjskega ciklusa“.
It involves including in the purchasing decision all the costs that will be incurred during the lifetime of the product or service.
To pomeni, da pri odločanju o naročilu upoštevate vse stroške, nastale v življenjski dobi proizvoda ali storitve.
How to use total lifecycle costing to promote environmental considerations when you buy can in some cases turn a bargain into an expensive purchase.
Neupoštevanje teh stroškov pri nakupu lahko v nekaterih primerih spremeni dobro kupčijo v drag nakup.
Disposal costs can range from the cost of physical removal to paying for secure disposal.
Stroški odstranjevanja lahko segajo od stroškov zične odstranitve do plačila za varno odstranitev.
Frequently, disposal is governed by very strict regulations.
Odstranjevanje pogosto urejajo zelo stroga pravila.
The policy of saving costs — and the environment at the same time — by using the ‘lifecycle costing’ approach can be put into practice in a number of ways.
Politiko varčevanja – in hkrati ohranjanja okolja – z uporabo pristopa „stroškov življenjskega ciklusa“ je mogoče izvajati na vrsto načinov.
The following list gives some examples.
V nadaljevanju so našteti nekateri primeri.
A. Savings on use of water and energy
Razumno načrtovanje faze odstranjevanja: primer gradbeništva
Planning the disposal phase intelligently: the example of the building sector
— P rir oč ni ko ek ol oš k em – o k o lju prijaznem – ja
The easiest step towards cost-effective and environmentfriendly procurement is in the saving of water, electricity and fossil fuels.
Eno od področij, kjer se ustvarja veliko odpadkov, je gradbeništvo.
The advantage is that these savings clearly benefit both the financial situation of the contracting authority and the environment.
Rušenje starih stavb ne vključuje samo odstranjevanja velike količine ruševin, ampak tudi ravnanje z nevarnimi materiali, kot je azbest.
Being easy to calculate and having a clear economical aspect, the costs of water and energy can easily be used as award criteria in public procurement procedures.
Tako lahko v svojem razpisu vprašate graditelje, koliko nevarnih odpadkov pričakujejo, da bo nastalo med rušitvijo in kakšni bodo stroški njihove odstranitve.
From an environmental point of view, the importance of use of water and energy is also undisputed, particularly for example the effect of fuel use on CO emissions,
V nekaterih primerih, npr. pri gradnji cest, bi moralo biti mogoče izračunati tudi koristi uporabe recikliranih odpadnih materialov, kot je izrabljeni odpadni asfalt.
One of the areas where a lot of waste is produced is the building sector.
Najlažji korak v smeri stroškovno učinkovitega in okolju prijaznega naročila je varčevanje z vodo, električno energijo in fosilnimi gorivi.
The demolition of old buildings means not only removing a large quantity of debris, but also managing hazardous materials, like asbestos.
Prednost je, da tako varčevanje očitno koristi nančnemu stanju naročnika in okolju.
So in your call for tenders you could ask builders how much hazardous waste they expect to produce during demolition and the cost of removing it.
Ker je izračun stroškov vode in energije preprost in ker imajo ti jasen ekonomski vidik, se lahko preprosto uporabijo kot merila za ocenjevanje v postopkih javnih naročil.
In some cases, e.g. road building, it should also be possible to calculate the profits to be made from using recycled waste materials, such as used asphalt.
Pomen uporabe vode in energije je nesporen tudi z okoljskega vidika, zlasti na primer učinek uporabe goriva na emisije CO ali nastajanje odpadkov.
Chapter 6Contract performance clauses
Poglavje 6 Določila o izvajanju naročila
• Contract clauses can be used to include environmental considerations at the performance stage.
• Pogodbena določila morajo biti povezana z izvajanjem naročila.
• Contract clauses should be linked to performance of the contract.
• Pogodbena določila se lahko uporabijo za to, da se v fazi izvedbe vključijo okoljske zahteve.
• The contracting authority can specify the way the goods are to be supplied and even the method of transport.
• Pogodbena določila ne smejo privesti do diskriminacije v prid izvajalcev iz katere koli določene države članice.
• Contract clauses may not result in discrimination in favour of contractors from any particular Member State.
• Naročnik lahko določi način dobave blaga in celo način prevoza.
• The contractor is obliged to respect all the performance clauses in the contract.
• Izvajalec je dolžan upoštevati vsa določila o izvajanju v naročilu.
• A contractor is obliged to respect all the performance clauses set out in the contract documents, when carrying out the work requested or supplying the products covered by the call for tender.
• Pri izvajanju zahtevanega dela ali pri dobavi proizvodov, zajetih v razpisu, mora izvajalec ali dobavitelj upoštevati vsa določila o izvajanju, določena v razpisni dokumentaciji.
Contract performance clauses are used to specify how a contract must be carried out.
Določila o izvajanju naročila se uporabijo za določitev načina izvajanja naročila.
It is recognised that environmental considerations can be included in contract performance clauses, provided they are published in the contract notice or the specifications and comply with Community law (1).
Priznava se, da se lahko okoljski vidiki vključijo v določila o izvajanju naročila, če so objavljeni v javnem razpisu ali v specifikacijah ter so v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti (1).
UK Defra example — In my building, you follow my environmental policy!
Primer Ministrstva za okolje Združenega kraljestva (DEFRA) – V moji stavbi boste upoštevali mojo okoljsko politiko!
The UK Environment Department (Defra) guidelines on green procurement specify that all contractors working on their site must follow the environmental policy of the department.
Smernice o zelenih javnih naročilih, ki jih je izdalo Ministrstvo za okolje ZK (DEFRA), določajo, da morajo vsi izvajalci, ki delajo v njihovih prostorih, slediti okoljski politiki ministrstva.
This includes rules on smoking, putting waste into the appropriate bins, complying with parking restrictions and generally following the rules on environmental protection that apply to staff (2).
To vključuje pravila o kajenju, odlaganju odpadkov v ustrezne smetnjake, upoštevanje omejitev parkiranja in na splošno ravnanje po pravilih o varstvu okolja, ki veljajo za osebje (2).
More information can be found on the Defra (UK Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs) homepage (http://www.defra.gov.uk).
Več informacij na: http://www.defra.gov.uk o lju prijaznem – ja em – o k ol oš k
• Contract clauses should not play a role in determining which tenderer gets the contract, which means that any bidder should, in principle, be able to cope with them.
• Pogodbena določila ne smejo imeti vloge pri odločanju, kateri ponudnik bo dobil naročilo, kar pomeni, da jih mora načelno obvladati vsak ponudnik.
They should not be disguised technical specifications, award or selection criteria.
Ta določila ne smejo biti prikrite tehnične specifikacije ali merila za ocenjevanje ali izbor.
Whereas tenderers must prove that their bids meet the technical specifications, proof of compliance with contract clauses should not be requested during the procurement procedure.
Medtem ko morajo ponudniki dokazati, da njihove ponudbe izpolnjujejo tehnične specifikacije, se med postopkom javnega naročila ne sme zahtevati dokaza o izpolnjevanju pogodbenih določil.
For example, you may not use contract clauses to require a particular production process (for supplies), or staff with particular experience (for services), since these are conditions that relate to the selection of the contractor.
Na primer, pogodbenih določil ne smete uporabiti, da bi zahtevali določen proizvodni proces (za dobavo) ali osebje z določenimi izkušnjami (za storitve), saj sta to pogoja, ki se nanašata na ugotavljanje sposobnosti.
These aspects should be handled within the relevant stage of the procedure laid down in the public procurement directives.
Te pogoje je treba obravnavati v okviru ustrezne faze postopka, določenega v direktivah o javnih naročilih.
Examples of possible contract performance clauses for works or service contracts include:
Nekaj primerov možnih pogodbenih določil o izvajanju gradenj ali storitev
• transport of products and tools to the site:
• Prevoz proizvodov in orodij na gradbišče el en o! e z
• Even though contract clauses are considered to be outside the procedure of the award of contracts they still need to be set out clearly in the call for tenders.
• Čeprav naj bi bila pogodbena določila zunaj postopka oddaje naročil, jih je treba v razpisu vseeno jasno določiti.
Indeed, tenderers should be
Ponudniki se morajo namreč zavedati vseh obveznosti, določenih v pogodbi o izvedbi naročila, da bi jih bili sposobni izraziti v ceni svoje ponudbe.
— use of reusable containers to transport products to the site;
– Uporaba zabojnikov za ponovno uporabo za prevoz proizvodov na gradbišče
) Article 26 of Directive 2004/18/EC and Article 38 of Directive 2004/17/EC.
) Člen 26 Direktive 2004/18/ES in člen 38 Direktive 2004/17/ES.
Chapter 6 — Contract performance clauses
Poglavje 6 – Določila o izvajanju naročila
• how the service is performed: of centralising packaging prior to reuse or recycling and encouraging the supplier to cut down on any unnecessary packaging).
• Kako opraviti storitev
• disposal of used products or packaging from products:
Uporaba dozirnih sredstev, da se zagotovi uporaba ustreznih količin čistilnega proizvoda
You can use contract clauses in some cases to specify the method of transport that should be used to deliver the goods, but make sure that this is not discriminatory.
V nekaterih primerih lahko pogodbena določila uporabite, da določite način prevoza, ki ga je treba uporabiti za dostavo blaga, vendar se prepričajte, da niso diskriminacijska.
products or packaging taken away for reuse, recycling or appropriate disposal by the contractor;
• Odstranjevanje izrabljenih proizvodov in embalaže
• training of contractor staff: staff trained in the environmental impact of their work and the environmental policy of the authority in whose buildings they will be working.
Izrabljene izdelke in embalažo izvajalec prevzame za ponovno uporabo, recikliranje ali odpelje v deponijo
– A handbook on environmental public procurement
6.3 Določila pogodbe o dobavi
For a major works contract it could be appropriate to require that goods be shipped to a dedicated rail or inland waterway facility.
Pri velikih javnih naročilih gradenj je mogoče ustrezno zahtevati, da se blago pošlje po železnici ali z ladjo.