natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its judgment of 13 December 2007 in Case F-95/05 N v Commission, the Tribunal made clear that candidates for recruitment in a non-member country cannot be deprived of the proper procedure for a medical examination as laid down in Article 33 of the St a Regulations.
Ugodeno je bilo le trem predlogom, drugi so bili zavrženi zaradi očitne nedopustnosti ali zavrnjeni zaradi očitne neutemeljenosti nameravane ali vložene tožbe bodisi zato, ker predlagatelj ni bil oziroma ni dokazal, da je zaradi svojega ekonomskega položaja popolnoma ali delno nesposoben nositi stroške, ki se nanašajo na pomoč in zastopanje pred sodiščem.
Status under the Staff Regulations
Prva bilanca prakse mirnega reševanja sporov
In its judgment of 13 December 2007 in Joined Cases F-51/05 and F-18/06 Duyster v Commission, concerning the establishment of the conditions for parental leave, the Tribunal referred to Council Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 on the framework agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC (OJ 1996 L 145, p.
Sodišče za uslužbence si je v svoji sodni praksi prizadevalo izpolniti željo zakonodajalca, in sicer olajšati mirno reševanje sporov v vseh stopnjah postopka.
4) in order to interpret Article 42a of the Staff Regulations. On the basis of the caselaw of the Court, the Tribunal made clear that, where the appointing authority makes a decision on a request for annulment or interruption of parental leave, its discretion is reduced where the person granted parental leave establishes that events occurring after the grant of leave incontestably make it impossible for him to care for the child under the conditions originally foreseen.
Tako je Sodišče za uslužbence na podlagi člena 7(4) priloge I k Statutu Sodišča in člena 64(2)(d) Poslovnika Sodišča prve stopnje, ki se mutatis mutandis uporabi za Sodišče za uslužbence do začetka veljavnosti Poslovnika Sodišča za uslužbence, večkrat poskusilo mirno rešiti spor.
This may be the case, in particular, where the ocial suers from a disease the gravity or characteristics of which prevent such care.
Štirinajst zadev je bilo mogoče končati z mirno rešitvijo spora, med njimi sedem s posredovanjem Sodišča za uslužbence, največkrat na neuradnem sestanku, ki ga je organiziral sodnik poročevalec, ali na obravnavi.
In this case, as those conditions were not established, the action was dismissed.
Ti podatki se očitno v prihodnje lahko spremenijo zaradi spodbud Sodišča za uslužbence v prid iskanju mirne rešitve sporov in na podlagi odprtosti, ki jo bodo v zvezi s tem izkazali zastopniki strank.
This year again the litigation concerning the reporting procedure and promotion was fairly plentiful.
Čeprav sestavljanje taksativnega seznama okoliščin, v katerih se priporoča mirna rešitev spora, ni niti mogoče niti zaželeno, je Sodišče za uslužbence določilo nekaj kategorij sporov, primernih za iskanje mirne rešitve spora.
In its judgments of 22 November 2007 in Case F-109/06 Dittert v Commission and in Case F-110/06 Carpi Badia v Commission, the Tribunal annulled the refusal to promote the applicants as the promotion procedure was vitiated by a procedural defect.
Dejavnost tudi v zadevah, do katerih javnost ne bi imela v celoti dostopa in pri katerih pravni prispevek sodbe ne bi bil očiten (na primer v primeru psihičnega ali spolnega nadlegovanja, premestitve uradnika zaradi kon¥ikta med njim in njegovim nadrejenim).
Because of a computer problem, the applicants’ names had been omitted from the list which the directorgeneral used for the award of priority points in the directorate-general, with the result that no points were awarded to them.
Navedemo lahko tudi ponavljajoče se zadeve, ki sledijo„poskusni“ zadevi in ki bi lahko imele enako rešitev kot v sodbi, izrečeni v tej zadevi.
The Tribunal stated that that provision has as its aim not to establish a condition of a prior period of sick leave which ocials and other servants who request the appointment of an Invalidity Committee must observe, but to determine the conditions for the exercise of the discretion available to the appointing authority or the authority empowered to conclude contracts where the latter, in the absence of a request by the ocial or member of the temporary sta, examine of their own motion whether it is appropriate to open such a procedure.
Dodati je treba, da ima uprava pogosto široko pooblastilo za odločanje po prostem preudarku, da lahko uspešno opravi naloge, ki so ji dodeljene, in da je sodni nadzor notranje zakonitosti pogosto zelo omejen.
In its judgment of 22 May 2007 in Case F-99/06 López Teruel v OHIM, the Tribunal set out in detail the new medical arbitration procedure described in the fifth to eighth subparagraphs of Article 59(1) of the Staff Regulations, under which an ocial on sick leave may dispute the results of the medical examination arranged by the institution where the finding of that examination is that his absence is unjustied.
Čeprav sodišče v določenem sporu ne more šteti, da je akt, ki ga je sprejel OPI na podlagi svojega širokega pooblastila za odločanje po prostem preudarku, nezakonit zaradi prekoračitve pooblastil, ni izključeno, da bi OPI lahko dosegel iskani cilj s sprejetjem drugega akta, ki bi bil prav tako zakonit, kot je izpodbijani akt, in ki ne bi povzročil zadevnega spora.
Remuneration and repayment of expenses
V tem primeru so še zlasti ugodne možnosti za iskanje mirne rešitve spora.
Civil Service Tribunal dened in settled case-law.
Sodišče za uslužbence
Rate of contribution
Boruta; predsednik senata H.
The Tribunal first dismissed the plea that the Annex was adopted in breach of the tripartite consultation procedure for staff relations set up by the Council Decision of 23 June 1981.
Kreppel; predsednik Sodišča za uslužbence P. Mahoney; predsednik senata S. Van Raepenbusch; sodnik H. Kanninen; sodnik S.
Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities
Člani Sodišča za uslužbence
The Tribunal has repeatedly applied Article 87(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, applicable mutatis mutandis, to rule either, under the first subparagraph of that provision, that costs should be shared between the parties where the circumstances are exceptional (judgment of 7 November 2007 in Case F-57/06 Hinderyckx v Council and order of 14 December 2007 in Case F-131/06 Steinmetzv Commission) or, under the second subparagraph, to order a successful party to pay part of the costs incurred by the opposite party which it considers to have been unreasonably or vexatiously caused (judgments of 9 October 2007 in Case F-85/06 Bellantone v Court of Auditors, and in Duyster v Commission), and even where an action was held to be manifestly inadmissible (order of 27 March 2007 in Case F-87/06 Manté v Council).
Rojen leta 1946; študij prava (Master of Arts, univerza Oxford, 1967; Master of Laws, University College London, 1969); predavatelj, University College London (1967–1973); barrister (London, 1972–1974); administrator, glavni administrator na Evropskem sodišču za človekove pravice (1974–1990); profesor prava, povabljen na univerzo v Saskatchewanu, Saskatoon, Kanada (1988); vodja osebja pri Svetu Evrope (1990–1993); vodja oddelka (1993–1995), namestnik sodnega tajnika (1995–2001), sodni tajnik Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice (2001–september 2005); predsednik Sodišča za uslužbence od 6. oktobra 2005.
Four applications for interim measures were brought in 2007, which were rejected because of the lack of urgency of the measures sought, which are required by settled caselaw to be taken and produce their eects before a decision is reached in the main action, in order to avoid serious and irreparable harm to the applicant’s interests (orders of the President of the Tribunal of 1 February 2007 in Case F-142/06 R Bligny v Commission, of 13 March 2007 in Case F-1/07 R Chassagne v Commission, of 10 September 2007 in Case F-83/07 R Zangerl-Posselt v Commission and of 21 November 2007 in Case F-98/07 R Petrilli v Commission).
Rojen leta 1945; univerzitetni študij v Berlinu, Münchnu, Frankfurtu na Majni (1966–1972); prvi državni izpit (1972); sodnik pripravnik v Frankfurtu na Majni (1972–1973 in 1974–1975); Collège d’Europe v Brugesu (1973–1974); drugi državni izpit (Frankfurt na Majni, 1976); uslužbenec Zveznega urada za delo in odvetnik (1976); sodnik delovnega sodišča (Zvezna dežela Hessen, 1977–1993); nosilec predmeta na Fachhochschule für Sozialarbeit v Frankfurtu na Majni in na Verwaltungsfachhochschule v Wiesbadnu (1979–1990); nacionalni strokovnjak v pravni službi Komisije Evropskih skupnosti (1993–1996 in 2001–2005); ataše za socialne zadeve na veleposlaništvu Zvezne republike Nemčije v Madridu (1996–2001); sodnik delovnega sodišča v Frankfurtu na Majni (februar–september 2005); sodnik Sodišča za uslužbence od 6. oktobra 2005.
Applications for legal aid
Irena Boruta
Seventeen orders ruling on applications for legal aid were made in 2007. Only three applications could be granted, the remainder being rejected either because the proposed action was manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded or because the applicant was not or did not prove that he was, because of his financial situation, wholly or partly unable to meet the costs involved in legal assistance and representation by a lawyer in proceedings.
Rojena leta 1950; diploma iz prava univerze v Wrocławu (1972), doktorica prava (Łodz 1982); odvetnica v odvetniški zbornici Republike Poljske (od leta 1977); povabljena raziskovalka (univerza Paris X, 1987–1988; univerza v Nantesu, 1993–1994); strokovnjakinja „Solidarnosc“ (1995–2000); profesorica delovnega in evropskega socialnega prava na univerzi v Łodzu (1997–1998 in 2001–2005), redna profesorica na Szkoła Główna Handlowa v Varšavi (2002), profesorica delovnega in socialnega prava na univerzi Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski v Varšavi (2002–2005); namestnica ministra za delo in socialne zadeve (1998–2001); članica pogajalskega odbora za pristop Republike Poljske k Evropski uniji (1998–2001); predstavnica poljske vlade pri Mednarodni organizaciji dela (1998–2001); avtorica več del o delovnem pravu in evropskem socialnem pravu; sodnica Sodišča za uslužbence od 6. oktobra 2005.
Although, in a given dispute, the lawfulness of a measure adopted by the appointing authority in the exercise of its wide discretion cannot be called into question in a review of misuse of powers by the court, it is possible that the appointing authority could have achieved the objective pursued by adopting a dierent, but equally lawful, measure from that challenged before the court, which could have prevented the dispute in question. This situation represents particularly fertile ground for amicable settlement.
Rojen leta 1956; diploma iz prava (université libre de Bruxelles, 1979); specializacija iz mednarodnega prava (Bruselj, 1980); doktor prava (1989); odgovorni pravne službe Société anonyme du canal et des installations maritimes de Bruxelles (1979–1984); uslužbenec Komisije Evropskih skupnosti (generalni direktorat za socialne zadeve 1984–1988); član pravne službe Komisije Evropskih skupnosti (1988–1994); strokovni sodelavec na Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti (1994–2005); predavatelj na centre universitaire de Charleroi (mednarodno in evropsko socialno pravo, 1989–1991), na univerzi Mons-Hainaut (evropsko pravo, 1991–1997), na univerzi v Liègu (pravo evropskih uslužbencev, 1989–1991; pravo institucij Evropske unije, 1995–2005; evropsko socialno pravo, 2004–2005); številne objave na področju evropskega socialnega prava in ustavnega prava Evropske unije; sodnik Sodišča za uslužbence od 6. oktobra 2005.
Composition
Protokolarni vrstni red
(Order of precedence as at 1 January 2007)
BORUTA, sodnica H. KANNINEN, sodnik H. TAGARAS, sodnik S.
H. Tagaras, Judge; I. Boruta, Judge; H. Kreppel, President of Chamber; P. Mahoney, President of the Tribunal; S. Van Raepenbusch, President of Chamber; H. Kanninen, Judge; S. Gervasoni, Judge; W. Hakenberg, Registrar.
GERVASONI, sodnik W. HAKENBERG, sodna tajnica
C — Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the Civil Service Tribunal
C – Sodne statistike Sodišča za uslužbence
General activity of the Civil Service Tribunal
Glavne dejavnosti Sodišča za uslužbence
New cases
Predložene zadeve
Percentage of the number of cases per principal defendant institution (2006–07)Language of the case (2006–07)
Odstotek števila zadev, v katerih so institucije glavne tožene stranke (2006–2007) Jezik postopka (2006–2007)
Judgments and orders — Bench hearing action (2007)Outcome (2007)Proceedings for interim measures: outcome (2007)Duration of proceedings (2007)
Sodbe in sklepi/Sestava (2007)Pomen odločitve (2007) Izdane začasne odredbe: pomen odločitve (2007)Trajanje postopkov (2007)
Bench hearing action (2007)Number of applicants (2007)
Sestava (2007)Število tožečih strank (2007)
Decisions of the Tribunal on appeal to the Court of First Instance (2006–07)Results of appeals to the Court of First Instance (2006–07)
Odločitve Sodišča za uslužbence, ki so bile predmet pritožbe pred Sodiščem prve stopnje (2006–2007)Izidi pritožb pred Sodiščem prve stopnje (2006–2007)
General activity of the Civil Service Tribunal — New cases, completed cases, cases pending (2005–07) (1)
Vložene zadeve, končane zadeve, nerešene zadeve (2005–2007)1
Completed cases (
Zaključene zadeve3
Completed cases (3
Končane zadeve3
1) The figures given (gross gures) represent the total number of cases, without account being taken of the joinder of cases on the ground of similarity (one case number = one case).
Navedene številke (bruto številke) označujejo celotno število zadev, neodvisno od združitev zaradi povezanosti (številkazadeve = ena zadeva).
) 2005: the Court of First Instance referred 117 cases to the newly created Civil Service Tribunal.
2005: Sodišče prve stopnje je na novoustanovljeno Sodišče za uslužbence preneslo 117 zadev.
(3) Unless otherwise indicated, this table and the following tables take account, for 2007, of all forms of procedure except applications for interim measures. If applications for interim measures are included: 52 cases in 2006
Če ni označeno drugače, ta tabela in naslednje upoštevajo za leto 2007 vse postopke, razen postopkov za izdajo začasne odredbe.
(plus one interim judgment), 154 cases in 2007 and 206 cases in total.
Skupaj s postopki za izdajo začasne odrede: 52 zadev v 2006 (poleg 1 vmesne sodbe), 154 zadev v 2007, torej skupaj 206 zadev.
) Including 77 suspended cases.
Od tega jih je bilo 77 prekinjenih.
New cases — Percentage of the number of cases per principal defendant institution (2006–07)
Vložene zadeve – Odstotek števila zadev institucij kot glavnih toženih strank (2006–2007)
Percentage of number of new cases (2007)
Odstotek števila vloženih zadev (2007)
Council of the European Union3.82 %
Svet Evropske unije3,82 %
European Parliament13.38 %
Evropski parlament13,38 %
Commission of the European Communities50.96 %
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti50,96 %
Court of Justice of the European Communities3.82 %
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti3,82 %
Court of Auditors of the European Communities1.91 %
Evropsko računsko sodišče1,91 %
European Parliament Council of the European Union
Evropski parlament Svet Evropske unije Komisija Evropskih skupnosti Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti Evropsko računsko sodišče Evropska centralna banka
New cases — Language of the case (2006–07)
Vložene zadeve – Jezik postopka (2006–2007)
Lithuanian1.27 %
Litovščina1,27 %
Spanish1.27 %
Španščina1,27 %
German10.83 %
Nemščina10,83 %
English5.10 %
Angleščina5,10 %
Bulgarian Spanish German Greek English French Italian Lithuanian Hungarian Dutch Romanian Slovenian Finnish
Bolgarščina Španščina Nemščina Grščina Angleščina Francoščina Italijanščina Litovščina Madžarščina Nizozemščina Romunščina Slovenščina Finščina
NB: The language of the case is determined by the language in which the proceedings were brought and not the applicant’s mother tongue or nationality.
Jezik postopka je jezik, v katerem je bila zadeva vložena, in ne materni jezik ali jezik državljanstva tožeče stranke.
Completed cases — Judgments and orders — Bench hearing action (2007)
Končane zadeve – Sodbe in sklepi – Sestava sodišča (2007)
Chambers sitting with three Judges89.33 %
Senati 3 sodnikov89,33 %
President9.33 %
Predsednik9,33 %
Other orders terminating proceedings (1)
Sklepi, s katerimi se postopek konča1
(1) Orders terminating proceedings by judicial determination, including those removing a case from the register following an amicable settlement reached between the parties as a result of action by the Civil Service Tribunal
Sodni sklepi, s katerimi se konča postopek, vključno s sklepi o izbrisu po sporazumni rešitvi med strankama na podlagi posredovanja Sodišča za uslužbence (razen sklepov, s katerimi se postopek konča z izbrisom iz drugih razlogov).
Completed cases — Outcome (2007)
Končane zadeve – Vrsta odločitve (2007)
Annulment of the decision
Zavrnitev tožbe
Recruitment/appointment/classication in grade
Socialna varnost / Poklicna bolezen / Nesreče
Completed cases — Proceedings for interim measures: outcome (2007)
Razglašene zadeve: vrsta odločitve (2007)
Number of applications for interim measures
Število začasnih odredb
Granted/contested decision set aside
Razglasitev ničnosti izpodbijane odločbe
Dismissed/ contested decision upheld
Zavrnitev / Potrditev izpodbijane odločbe
Completed cases — Duration of proceedings (2007)
Končane zadeve – Trajanje postopkov (2007)1
Average duration
Sodbe
Overall average
Splošno povprečje
New cases before the Civil Service Tribunal New cases before the Court of First Instance ()1
Zadeve, predložene Sodišču za uslužbence Zadeve, predložene Sodišču prve stopnje1
New cases before the Civil Service Tribunal New cases before the Court of First Instance (1)
Zadeve, predložene Sodišču za uslužbence Zadeve, predložene Sodišču prve stopnje1
Total Overall total
Skupaj SKUPAJ SPLOŠNO
2006: the Court of First Instance referred one more case to the Civil Service Tribunal.
2006: Sodišče prve stopnje je na Sodišče za uslužbence preneslo še eno zadevo.
Chambers sitting with three Judges97.62 %
Senati 3 sodnikov97,62 %
President0.95 %
Predsednik0,95 %
1) To this gure must be added 25 unassigned cases.
Temu številu je treba dodati 25 nedodeljenih zadev.
Cases pending as at 31 December — Number of applicants (2007)
Nerešene zadeve na dan 31. decembra – Število tožečih strank – (2007)
Number of applicants per case (1)
Število tožečih strank na zadevo1
Staff Regulations — Pension — Application of the weighting calculated on the basis of the average cost of living in the country of residence
Kadrovski predpisi – Pokojnina – Uporaba korekcijskega koecienta, izračunanega glede na povprečne življenjske stroške v državi bivanja
Staff Regulations — Contract staff — Duration of contracts, renewal and/or extension for a denite or indenite period
Kadrovski predpisi – Zaposlovanje – Pogodbeni uslužbenci – Trajanje pogodb, obnova in/ali podaljšanje za določen ali nedoločen čas
Staff Regulations — Appointments — Candidates placed on a reserve list before the new Staff Regulations entered into force
Kadrovski predpisi – Imenovanja – Kandidati, ki so bili pred začetkom veljavnosti novih kadrovskih predpisov vpisani na čakalni seznam
Staff Regulations — Appointments — Reclassication of contracts for a denite period as a single contract for an indenite period
Kadrovski predpisi – Imenovanja – Sprememba pogodb za določen čas v eno pogodbo za nedoločen čas
Staff Regulations — Contract staff — Review of classication and remuneration
Kadrovski predpisi – Pogodbeni uslužbenci – Revizija razvrstitve in osebnega prejemka
Staff Regulations — Pension — Pension statements — Weighting now calculated on the basis of the average cost of living in the country of residence rather than in relation to the capital of that country
Kadrovski predpisi – Pokojnina – Pokojninski listi – Koecient, izračunan glede na povprečne življenjske stroške v državi bivanja in ne več glede na glavno mesto te države
Staff Regulations — Appointments — Classication in grade — Multiplier and cancellation of promotion points
Kadrovski predpisi – Imenovanja – Razvrstitev v naziv – Množilni koecient in izbris točk za napredovanje
Total number of applicants for all pending cases
Skupno število tožečih strank za vse vložene zadeve
Total applicants1 267
Skupno število nerešenih zadev
(1) Those applicants who have brought more than one action have been counted in respect of each action brought.
Tožeče stranke, ki so vložile več tožb, so bile upoštevane pri vsaki vloženi tožbi.
(2) The term ‘Sta Regulations’ below means the Staff Regulations of Ocials of the European Communities and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities.
Izraz„Kadrovski predpisi“ zajema Kadrovske predpise za uradnike Evropskih skupnosti in Pogoje za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev Evropskih skupnosti.
Miscellaneous — Decisions of the Tribunal on appeal to the Court of First Instance (2006–07)
Razno – Odločbe Sodišča za uslužbence, zoper katere je bila vložena pritožba na Sodišče prve stopnje (2006-2007)
Number of decisions against which appeals were brought (1
Število odločb, zoper katere je bila vložena pritožba1
Total number of decisions open to challenge (
Skupno število izpodbojnih odločb2
Total number of decisions open to challenge (2)
Skupno število izpodbojnih odločb2
Number of decisions against which appeals were brought (1)
Število odločb, zoper katere je bila vložena pritožba1
Percentage of decisions against which appeals were brought (3)
Odstotek odločb, zoper katere je bila vložena pritožba3
1) The decisions in Cases F-92/05 and F-17/05 were each the subject of two appeals.
Zoper vsako od odločb v zadevah F-92/05 in F-17/05 sta bili vloženi dve pritožbi.
(2) Total number of decisions open to challenge — judgments and orders relating to inadmissibility, concerning interim measures, declaring that there was no need to adjudicate or refusing leave to intervene — in respect of which the period for bringing an appeal expired or against which an appeal was brought.
Skupno število izpodbojnih odločb – sodbe in sklepi o nedopustnosti, začasnih odredbah, ustavitvi postopka in zavrnitvi intervencije – za katere se je rok za vložitev pritožbe iztekel ali zoper katere je bila vložena pritožba.
(3) In 2007, the percentage of decisions against which appeals were brought was 19 % of the total number of cases completed, not including cases which were discontinued unilaterally by one of the parties.
Odstotek odločb, zoper katere je bila vložena pritožba, v letu 2007 znaša 19 % skupnega števila končanih zadev, brez primerov enostranskega odstopa ene od strank.
In 2006 that percentage was 21 %.
V letu 2006 je znašal 21 %.
Miscellaneous — Results of appeals to the Court of First Instance (2006–07)
Razno – Izidi pritožbenih postopkov na Sodišču prve stopnje (2006–2007)
Appeal dismissed85.71 %
Zavrnjena pritožba85,71 %
Granted/contested decision set aside14.29 %
Razglasitev ničnosti izpodbijane odločbe14,29 %
Appeal dismissed
Zavrnjena pritožba
Removal from the register/no need to adjudicate
Izbris zadeve / Ustavitev postopka
Annual Report 2007
Srečanja in obiski
23 February
23. februar parlamentarna skupina
Delegation from the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia
Delegacija Ustavnega sodišča Republike Slovenije
Symposium on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the signature of the Treaties of Rome
Simpozij ob 50-letnici podpisa Rimskih pogodb
Delegation of senior judges from the Kingdom of Denmark
Delegacija visokih sodnikov in državnih tožilcev iz Kraljevine Danske
Information day for the new Members of the Court of First Instance
Informativni dan za nove člane Sodišča prve stopnje
Mr V. Itälä, Rapporteur for the 2008 budget at the European Parliament
Itälä, poročevalec Evropskega parlamenta za proračun za leto 2008
Delegation from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE)
Delegacija Sveta odvetniških združenj Evropske skupnosti (CCBE)
Delegation of German judges, professors and lawyers specialising in Community law
Delegacija nemških sodnikov, tožilcev, profesorjev in odvetnikov, strokovnjakov na področju prava Skupnosti
European Union Forum of Judges for the Environment
Forum sodnikov iz Evropske unije o okolju
11–12 December
Svetovne trgovinske