natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
SAPS is currently applied in ten of the new Member States ( 6 ) and in 2009 accounted for 3 723 million euro of expenditure.
SEPP se trenutno uporablja v desetih novih državah članicah ( 6 ) in je v letu 2009 pomenila odhodke v višini 3 723 milijonov EUR.
— Other direct aid schemes (coupled payments) designed to maintain production in areas which would otherwise be at risk of abandonment of production.
— Druge sheme neposrednih pomoči (vezana plačila) so zasnovane za ohranjanje proizvodnje na površini, za katero bi sicer obstajalo tveganje opustitve proizvodnje.
The amounts involved, which in general are declining due to further decoupling and integration of other support schemes in the SPS, accounted for 6 585 million euro of expenditure.
S tem povezani zneski se zaradi nadaljnjega ločevanja in vključe­vanja drugih podpornih shem na splošno zmanjšujejo, in so predstavljali odhodke v višini 6 585 milijonov EUR.
— Payments made from the Sugar Restructuring Fund were financed by contributions from producers holding quota which are revenue assigned to the EAGF.
— Plačila iz Sklada za prestrukturiranje industrije sladkorja so bila financirana s prispevki proizvajalcev, ki imajo kvote, tj. prihodki, ki so namenjeni EKJS.
— Interventions in agricultural markets: the principal measures are intervention, storage and export refunds and other measures such as specific support for the wine, fruit and vegetable and food programmes (in total amounting to 3 988 million euro) and Sugar Restructuring Fund (3 018 million euro).
— Intervencije na kmetijskih trgih: glavni ukrepi so intervencije, skladiščenje, izvozna nadomestila in drugi ukrepi, kot so posebna podpora za programe za vino, sadje in zelenjavo ter pomoč v hrani (v skupnem znesku 3 988 milijonov EUR) in sklad za prestrukturiranje sladkorne industrije (3 018 milijonov EUR).
( 4 ) The number and value of each farmer's entitlement was calculated by the national authorities according to one of the models provided for under EU legislation.
( 4 ) Število in vrednost pravic za vsakega kmeta so izračunali nacionalni organi v skladu z enim od modelov, ki jih določa zakonodaja EU.
Under the historical model each farmer is granted entitlements based on the average amount of aid received and area farmed during the reference period 2000 to 2002.
V okviru zgodovinskega modela se vsakemu kmetu odobrijo pravice na osnovi povprečnega zneska prejete pomoči in območja, na katerem je kmetoval med letoma 2000 in 2002.
Under the regional model all entitlements of a region have the same flat-rate value and the farmer is allocated an entitlement for every eligible hectare declared in the first year of application.
V okviru regionalnega modela pa imajo vse pravice v neki regiji enako pavšalno vrednost in posameznemu kmetu se dodeli pravica za vsak upravičen prija­vljen hektar v prvem letu zahtevka.
The hybrid model combines the historical element with a flat rate amount and, if it is dynamic, the historical component decreases each year until it becomes a predominantly flat rate-system.
Hibridni model združuje zgodo­vinski element s pavšalnim zneskom in zgodovinska komponenta se, če je model dinamičen, vsako leto zmanjša, dokler ne preide v pretežno pavšalni sistem.
( 5 ) Based on Article 137 of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p.
( 5 ) Na podlagi člena 137 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 73/2009 (UL L 30, 31.1.2009, str.
16), payment entitlements allocated to farmers before 1 January 2009 shall be deemed legal and regular as from 1 January 2010, except in cases of allocation on the basis of factually incorrect applications unless the farmer could not reasonably have detected the error.
1. januarjem 2009, štejejo za zakonite in redne od 1. januarja 2010, razen v primerih dodelitve na podlagi vsebinsko napačnih zahtevkov, razen če kmet ni mogel odkriti napake.
( 6 ) Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania and Slovakia.
( 6 ) V Bolgariji, na Češkem, v Estoniji, na Cipru, v Latviji, Litvi, na Madžarskem, Poljskem, v Romuniji in na Slovaškem.
(8 992 million euro) ( 7 ).
(8 992 milijonov EUR) ( 7 ).
In 2009, in the framework of the so called CAP Health Check ( 8 ) and the European Economic
Leta 2009 so se v okviru tako imenovanega zdravstvenega pregleda SKP ( 8 ) in Evropskega
The figure (8 992 million) relates to payment appropriations for chapters 0504 and 0505, which includes:
Znesek (8 992 milijonov EUR) se nanaša na odobritve plačil za poglavji 05 04 in 05 05, ki vključujejo:
— operational technical assistance;
— operativno tehnično pomoč,
Recovery Plan ( 9), additional funding has been channelled via Rural Development to finance priorities such as broadband internet infrastructure, climate change, renewable energies, water management, biodiversity and measures accompanying restructuring of the dairy sector.
— ukrepe za genske vire, načrta za oživitev gospodarstva ( 9 ) z dodatnimi sredstvi prek programov razvoja podeželja financirale prednostne naloge, kot so širokopasovna internetna infrastruktura, klimatske spre­membe, obnovljivi viri energije, gospodarjenje z vodnimi viri, biotska raznovrstnost in spremljevalni ukrepi za prestrukturi­ranje sektorja mleka.
However, no expenditure has been incurred under the latter measures during 2009.
Vendar v okviru omenjenih ukrepov leta 2009 ni bilo odhodkov.
— recoveries from former EAGGF guarantee programmes (EU15);
— vračila iz prejšnjih jamstvenih programov EKUJS (EU15),
— pre-accession instruments (SAPARD), which are not part of EAFRD and in fact are under a separate budget heading as well as another heading within the Financial Perspectives.
— predpristopne instrumente (SAPARD), ki niso del EKSRP in so pravzaprav pod ločeno proračunsko postavko ter pod drugo postavko v okviru finančnih okvirov.
These requirements relate to the protection of the environment, the public, animal and plant health, animal welfare (Statutory Management Requirements) and to the maintenance of agricultural land in good agri­cultural and environmental condition (GAEC) ( 11 ).
Te zahteve se nanašajo na varovanje okolja, javno zdravje ter zdravje živali in rastlin, dobro počutje živali (predpisane zahteve ravnanja) ter na ohranjanje zemljišč v stanju, ki je v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji ( 11 ).
EU legis­lation provides that when noncompliance with those requirements is noted, a reduction or exclusion ( 12 ) shall be applied on the overall amount of direct payments made in respect of the applications submitted in the course of the calendar year of the finding.
Zakonodaja EU določa, da se ob ugotovitvi neskladnosti s temi zahtevami uporabi znižanje ali izključitev ( 12 ) celotnega zneska izvršenih nepo­srednih plačil za zahtevke, ki so bili predloženi v koledarskem letu ugotovitve.
The Court’s testing of payments to farmers includes only a limited number of cross compliance requirements (see paragraph 3.17, third indent).
Preizkušanje plačil kmetom, ki ga izvede Sodišče, zajema le omejeno število zahtev v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo (glej odstavek 3.17, tretja alinea).
When infringements are detected they are classified as non-quan­tifiable errors and therefore not included in the error rate calculation.
Kadar so odkrite kršitve, so razvrščene med količinsko neopredeljive napake in zato niso zajete v izračun stopnje napak.
( 7 ) This amount entails expenditure in respect of previous programming period as well as pre-accession instruments.
( 7 ) Ta znesek vključuje odhodke v zvezi s prejšnjim programskim obdobjem in predpristopnimi instrumenti.
( 11 ) Whilst GAEC standards, as referred to in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, apply in all Member States, Statutory
( 11 ) Standardi za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje, ki so navedeni v Prilogi IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003, se uporabljajo v vseh državah članicah, predpisane zahteve ravnanja, ki so navedene v Prilogi III k isti Uredbi, pa so zavezujoče le v EU-15.
Management Requirements (SMRs) as referred to in Annex III of that regulation are mandatory only in EU-15. For the EU-10, SMRs are being phased in between 2009 and 2013, and for EU-2 between 2012 and 2014.
Za EU-10 se predpisane zahteve ravnanja postopoma uvajajo med letoma 2009 in 2013, za EU-2 pa bodo uvedene med letoma 2012 in 2014.
( 12 ) According to Articles 66 and 67 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 (OJ L 141, 30.4.2004, p.
( 12 ) V skladu s členoma 66 in 67 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 796/2004 (UL L 141, 30.4.2004, str.
18), the level of the reduction per SMR or GAEC not complied with can vary between 1 % and 5 % in case of negligence and can lead to full rejection of the aid in case of intentional non-compliance.
18) lahko raven znižanj pri nesklad­ nosti s posamezno predpisano zahtevo ravnanja in dobrimi kmetij­skimi in okoljskimi pogoji znaša med 1 % in 5 % pri malomar­nosti, pri namerni neskladnosti pa lahko pride do popolne izključitve iz plačil.
A farmer is defined to be a person who carries out an agricultural activity.
Kmet je opredeljen kot oseba, ki izvaja kmetijsko dejavnost.
An agricultural activity is defined as the production, rearing or growing of agricultural products including harvesting, milking, breeding animals and keeping animals for farming purposes, or maintaining the land in good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC) ( 13 ).
Ta je opredeljena kot proizvodnja, vzreja ali pridelovanje kmetij­skih proizvodov, kar zajema žetev, molžo, rejo živali in rejo živali za kmetijske namene ali ohranjanje zemljišč v stanju, ki je v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji ( 13 ).
According to the relevant EU rules, if no other agricultural activity is carried out by the applicant, the maintenance of land in GAEC constitutes the minimum agri­cultural activity required of the applicant to be eligible for aid.
V skladu z veljavnimi pravili EU se ohranjanje zemljišča v dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih šteje kot minimalna kmetijska dejavnost, ki jo mora vlagatelj zahtevka izvajati, da je upra­vičen do pomoči, če ne izvaja nobene druge kmetijske dejav­nosti.
Before these paying agencies can claim any expenditure from the EU- budget, they must be accredited on the basis of criteria laid down by the Commission.
Preden te plačilne agencije lahko vložijo zahtevek za kakršen koli odhodek iz proračuna EU, morajo biti akreditirane na osnovi meril, ki jih določi Komisija.
These paying agencies make payments to the beneficiaries and prior to doing so, they must, either directly or through delegated bodies, satisfy them­selves of the eligibility of the aid applications.
Te plačilne agencije izvršujejo plačila upra­vičencem, pred tem pa se morajo neposredno ali prek poobla­ ščenih organov prepričati o upravičenosti zahtevkov za pomoč.
The accounts and payments of the paying agencies are examined by inde­pendent audit bodies (certification bodies) which report to the Commission in February of the following year.
Računovodske izkaze in plačila plačilnih agencij pregledajo neodvisni revizijski organi (certifikacijski organi), ki o tem poročajo Komisiji februarja naslednjega leta.
Policy areas Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Health and Consumer Protection
Področja politik okolje, pomorske zadeve in ribištvo, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov
The Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE) ( 14 ) is the most important instrument in terms of funding covering the EU contribution for projects in the Member States in favour of nature and biodiversity, as well as environment policy, governance, information and communication.
Finančni instrument za okolje (LIFE) ( 14 ) je najpo­membnejši instrument financiranja iz sredstev EU za projekte v državah članicah na področju narave in biotske raznovrstnosti ter okoljske politike, upravljanja, informiranja in komunici­ranja.
The Common Fisheries Policy pursues the same objectives as the Common Agricultural Policy (see paragraph 3.3).
Skupna ribiška politika ima enake cilje kot skupna kmetijska politika (glej odstavek 3.3).
( 13 ) See Article 1 and Article 2(a) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/ 2003.
_____________ ( 13 ) Glej člen 1 ter člen 2(a) in (c) Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003.
( 14 ) Regulation (EC) No 614/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 149, 9.6.2007, p. 1).
( 14 ) Uredba (ES) št. 614/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 149, 9.6.2007, str. 1).
( 15 ) The Financial Instrument for the Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) has been replaced by the EFF for the new programming period
( 15 ) ESR je v novem programskem obdobju (2007–2013) nadomestil Finančni instrument za usmerjanje ribištva – Uredba Sveta (ES) št.
Advances and interim/final payments
Predplačila in vmesna/končna plačila
In 2009, the payments charged to the EAFRD concerned only interim payments whereas for the EFF they comprised also advances.
Leta 2009 so bila plačila, ki so breme­nila EKSRP, le vmesna plačila, pri ESR pa so zajemala tudi predplačila.
For Environment, prefinancing of up to 40 % of the EU contribution for a LIFE project, as established in the grant agreement, is foreseen.
Za področje okolja je predvideno predfinanciranje v višini do 40 % prispevka EU za posamezen projekt LIFE, kot je določeno v sporazumu o dona­ciji.
In addition, reprogramming to take account of the Health Check and the European Recovery Package may also have led to some delays in the launch of new projects by Member States pending adoption of the revised Rural Development programmes.
Poleg tega je lahko nekatere zamude pri začetku novih projektov povzročilo tudi reprogramiranje zaradi upoštevanja pregleda SKP in evropskega paketa za gospodarsko okrevanje, in sicer v državah članicah, ki so čakale na odobritev spremenjenih programov razvoja podeželja.
For the audit of policy group Agriculture and Natural Resources the following specific points should be noted:
Glede revizije skupine politik kmetijstvo in naravni viri je treba navesti naslednje:
— a sample of 241 payments was tested,
— preizkušen je bil vzorec z 241 plačili,
( 16 ) For EFF a second prefinancing amount of 7 % was paid upon request according to Council Regulation (EC) No 744/2008 (OJ
( 16 ) V skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 744/2008 (UL L 202, 31.7.2008, str.
( 17 ) Amending budget No 10, adopted by the European Parliament on 16 December 2009.
( 17 ) Sprememba proračuna št. 10, ki jo je Evropski parlament sprejel 16. decembra 2009.
( 18 ) Budget item 05.04.05.01: the payments amounted to a total of 8 209,4 million euro in 2009.
( 18 ) Proračunska postavka 05 04 05 01: plačila so leta 2009 skupaj znašala 8 209,4 milijona EUR.
The payment appropriations available in the initial budget amounted to 9 135,3 million euro and a further 774,9 million euro had been carried over from 2008.
Odobrena proračunska sredstva za plačila v prvotnem proračunu so znašala 9 135,3 milijona EUR, 774,9 milijona EUR pa je bilo prenesenih iz leta 2008.
— the assessment of supervisory and control systems covered for EAGF selected paying agencies in four Member States applying the SAPS — Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia — and in four Member States applying the SPS: Malta, Greece, Italy (Emilia-Romagna) and Spain (Basque Country).
— ocena nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov je pri EKJS zajela izbrane plačilne agencije v štirih državah članicah, ki uporabljajo SEPP – na Cipru, v Latviji, Litvi in na Slova­ škem –, in v štirih državah članicah, ki uporabljajo SEP – na Malti, v Grčiji, Italiji (v Emiliji-Romanji) in Španiji (v Baskiji).
Additionally, in the case of Malta the audit covered the allocation of entitlements following the intro­duction of SPS in 2007.
Poleg tega je za Malto revizija zajela tudi dodelitev pravic po uvedbi SEP leta 2007.
For Rural Development expenditure, the Court tested the supervisory and control systems in Austria, Germany (Bavaria), United Kingdom (England), Greece, Czech Republic, Romania, Bulgaria and France.
Za odhodke za razvoj podeželja je Sodišče preizkusilo nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme v Avstriji, Nemčiji (na Bavarskem), Združenem kraljestvu (v Angliji), Grčiji, na Češkem, v Romuniji, Bolga­riji in Franciji.
For Health and Consumer Protection the Court audited super­visory and control systems relating to the animal disease eradication and monitoring programmes,
Za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov je Sodišče revidiralo nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme, povezane s programi za izkoreninjenje in spremljanje živalskih bolezni,
— as regards cross compliance, when auditing area related payments the Court limits its testing to GAEC obligations (minimum soil cover, encroachment of unwanted vegetation) for which evidence can be obtained and a conclusion reached at the time of the audit visit.
— Sodišče je v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo pri revidiranju plačil, vezanih na površino, svoje preizkušanje omejilo na obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz standardov za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje (minimalna talna odeja, širitev nezaželene vegetacije), za katere je mogoče v času revizijskega obiska pridobiti dokaze in priti do zaključka.
Certain statutory management requirements (protection of groundwater and soil against pollution, animal identifi­cation and animal welfare) were tested in respect of EAFRD payments.
V zvezi s plačili EKSRP so bile preizkušene nekatere predpisane zahteve ravnanja (varstvo podzemne vode in tal pred onesnaževa­njem, identifikacija živali in dobro počutje živali).
Furthermore, in the context of its IACS systems audits the Court has analysed the implemen­tation at national level of the GAEC standards and the control systems put in place by the Member States,
Sodišče je poleg tega v okviru svojih revizij sistemov IAKS analizi­ralo izvajanje standardov za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje na nacionalni ravni in kontrolne sisteme, ki so jih vzpostavile države članice,
— in addition, in order to assess the basis for the Commission’s financial clearance decisions the Court reviewed 60 of the certification bodies’ certificates and reports related to 54 paying agencies ( 19 ).
— Sodišče je pregledalo tudi 60 potrdil in poročil certifikacij­skih organov, ki so se nanašala na 54 plačilnih agencij ( 19 ), da bi ocenilo osnovo za odločbo Komisije o finančni potrditvi.
On this basis the Court’s estimate of the most likely error for Agriculture and Natural Resources lies between 2 % and 5 %.
Na osnovi tega Sodišče ocenjuje, da je najverjetnejša stopnja napake za kmetijstvo in naravne vire med 2 % in 5 %.
Moreover the risk to the EU budget is adequately covered by the conformity clearance procedure.
Poleg tega je tveganje za proračun EU ustrezno zajeto v postopku potrditve skladnosti.
However, for three paying agencies (two for EAGF and one for EAFRD) no report and certificate were submitted in due time by the competent certification bodies, and thus no review was performed.
EKSRP) pristojni certifikacijski organi niso pravočasno predložili nobenih poročil in potrdil, zato pregled ni bil izveden.
For the same reason the Commission disjoined the accounts of these three paying agencies.
Iz istega razloga je Komisija izločila obračune teh treh plačilnih agencij.
42 (64 %) ( 21 ) of these trans­ actions were affected by quantifiable errors notably concerning eligibility and accuracy.
Na 42 (64 %) ( 21 ) teh transakcij so vplivale količinsko opredeljive napake predvsem v zvezi z upravičenostjo in točnostjo. V nadaljevanju so navedeni primeri napak.
24 (69 %) of these trans­
Na 24 (69 %) teh transakcij so vplivale količinsko opredeljive napake.
With regard to Rural Development expenditure, out of 80 transactions sampled, 25 (31 %) were affected by errors.
Pri odhodkih za razvoj pode­ želja so napake vplivale na 25 (31 %) od 80 transakcij v vzorcu.
16 (64 %) of these transactions were affected by quantifiable errors.
Na 16 (64 %) teh transakcij so vplivale količinsko opredeljive napake.
( 20 ) In 2008, the corresponding figure was 66 (32 %). ( 21 ) In 2008, the corresponding figure was 45 (68 %).
( 20 ) V letu 2008 so napake vplivale na 66 transakcij (32 %). ( 21 ) V letu 2008 so napake vplivale na 45 transakcij (68 %).
( 22 ) One transaction sampled was the subject of a conformity clearance procedure under Article 11 of Commission Regulation (EC) No
( 22 ) Ena transakcija v vzorcu je bila obravnavana v postopku potrditve skladnosti v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 885/
90) and therefore no final assessment was possible at the time of the audit.
90), zato v času revizije končna ocena ni bila mogoča.
Natural or legal persons are entitled to receive SAPS payments if they carry out an agricultural activity or maintain the land in good agricultural condition (GAC) ( 1).
Fizične ali pravne osebe so upravičene do prejemanja plačil SEPP, če opravljajo kmetijsko dejavnost ali vzdržujejo zemljišče v dobrih kmetijskih pogojih (GAC) ( 1).
Thus, no specific agricultural activity is required.
Posebna kmetijska dejavnost torej ni potrebna.
It is sufficient that the beneficiary respects good agricultural conditions (GAC).
Zadostuje že, da upravičenec upošteva dobre kmetijske pogoje (GAC).
This case does not concern the regularity under the relevant EU rules, but rather the political choice made by the EU legislator during the Health Check by leaving it to the Member States to decide whether to grant direct payments to natural or legal persons whose principal business objects do not consist of exercising an agricultural activity or whose agricultural activities are insignif- icant.
Revizorjem niso mogli predložiti nobenih dokazov, da je družba upravičena do pomoči zaradi izvajanja kmetijske dejavnosti, tj. proizvodnje ali pridelo- vanja kmetijskih proizvodov, reje živali, reje živali za kmetijske namene ali ohranjanja zemljišč v stanju, ki je v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji, zaradi česar je bilo plačilo pomoči (30 000 EUR) neupravičeno.
Further reflexion on this point is taking place in the context of the post-2013 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy.
Sodišče meni, da je to še en primer problema, na katerega je opozorilo že v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2008 ( 23). ).
No proof could be provided to the auditors that the company qualified for aid by carrying out an agricultural activity — i.e. production or growing of agricultural products, rearing or keeping animals for farming purposes, or maintaining land in good agricultural condition (GAC) — with the result that payment of the aid (30 000 euros) was not justified.
Ta primer se ne nanaša na pravilnost v skladu z ustreznimi predpisi EU, ampak na politično odločitev, ki jo je zakonodajalec EU sprejel med pregledom SKP, ko je državam članicam prepustil odločitev o tem, ali bodo odobrile neposredna plačila fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, katerih glavna dejavnost ni opravljanje kmetijske dejavnosti ali katerih kmetijske dejavnosti predstavljajo le majhen delež.
The Court considers that this case is a further example of the problem that the Court had already pointed out in its 2008 Annual Report ( 23). ).
Nadaljnji premisleki o tej točki potekajo v okviru reforme skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013.
Evidence from the payment file shows that in September 2008, the national authorities concerned checked the land claimed on the spot, including some of the parcels inspected by the Court, and determined the payment on the basis of the area which they found to be in good agricultural condition.
Iz podatkov v spisu o plačilih je razvidno, da so septembra 2008 zadevni nacionalni organi na kraju samem preverili zemljišče iz zahtevka, vključno z nekaterimi parcelami, ki jih je pregledalo Sodišče, in na podlagi zemljišča, za katerega so ugotovili, da je v dobrih kmetijskih pogojih, določili plačilo.
An on-the-spot visit of the Commission in May 2010 confirmed that the corresponding area paid continues to be in good agricultural conditions.
Obisk Komisije na kraju samem v maju 2010 je potrdil, da je pripadajoče zemljišče, ki je predmet plačil, še vedno v dobrih kmetijskih pogojih.
An SPS payment was made to a beneficiary who incorrectly declared an area of rented poor pasture land.
Plačilo SEP je prejel upravičenec, ki je napačno prijavil najete pašnike slabe kakovosti.