natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In 2007, the Court identified regularity errors in three payments which were financed either under the fifth or the sixth Framework Programmes for research and tech­nological development.
Sodišče je leta 2007 ugotovilo napake v zvezi s pravil­nostjo pri treh plačilih, ki so bila financirana iz 5. ali 6. okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj.
The errors detected were principally due to: inadequate or missing supporting evidence to justify the cost claimed; the use of budgeted figures which does not comply with the contractual requirements to use actual cost; and inclusion of various ineligible costs.
Ugotovljene napake so bile predvsem posledica: neustreznih ali manjkajočih dokazil, ki bi upravičila prijavljene stroške; uporabe v proračunu predvidenih stroškov, ki ni skladna s pogodbenimi zahtevami po uporabi dejanskih stroškov, ter vključitve različnih neupravičenih stroškov.
(2007 Annual Report, paragraphs 10.16 and 10.17)
(Letno poročilo za leto 2007, odstavka 10.16 in 10.17.) radni
Audit certification of project cost statements of the
Revizijsko potrjevanje izjav o stroških projektov list Evropske
The EU financial rules require that cost statements above a certain threshold have to be accompanied by an audit certificate.
Finančna pravila EU zahtevajo, da mora izjave o stroških, ki presegajo določen prag, spremljati revizijsko potrdilo.
In three projects the certifying auditor issued an unqualified opinion whereas the Court detected serious quantifiable errors.
Za tri projekte je revizor, ki izvaja potrjevanje, izrekel mnenje brez pridržka, čeprav je Sodišče našlo resne količinsko opredeljive napake.
These measures are unlikely to have a positive impact on the number of cost statements with errors in them in the short term because as at the end of 2009, DG ENTR has not yet executed a payment accompanied by such a certificate and the Commission had accepted the cost methodologies of only 11 beneficiaries.
Malo verjetno je, da bodo imeli ti ukrepi krat­koročno pozitiven učinek na število izjav o stroških, ki vsebujejo napake, saj GD ENTR do konca leta 2009 še ni izvršil nobenega plačila, ki bi ga spremljalo tako potrdilo, Komisija pa je potrdila metodologije obračunavanja stroškov za samo 11 upravičencev.
(2007 Annual Report, paragraphs 10.27 to 10.30)
(Letno poročilo za leto 2007, odstavki 10.27 do 10.30.)
Most FP7 projects are only in their first reporting period which explains the limited number of certificates on financial statements at the end of 2009.
Večina projektov 7. OP je šele v prvem obdobju poročanja, kar pojasnjuje majhno število potrdil o računovodskih izkazih ob koncu leta 2009.
As regards ex ante certification of the cost methodology, at the end of May 2010, the Commission had accepted the cost methodologies of 25 beneficiaries.
Glede predhodnega potrjevanja metodologije obračunavanja stroškov je do konca maja 2010 Komisija sprejela metodologije obračunavanja stroškov 25 upravičencev.
Compliance of systems with the financial regulation
Skladnost sistemov s finančno uredbo
Observations on specific Institutions
Opažanja o posameznih institucijah
Court of Justice
Sodišče Evropske unije
European Economic and Social Committee
Evropski ekonomsko–socialni odbor
Conclusions and recommendation
Zaključki in priporočilo
European Agencies and Executive Agencies
Agencije EU in izvajalske agencije
European Schools
Evropske šole
Key information on the Institutions and bodies covered, and on the spending in 2009 is provided in Table 9.1.
Ključne informacije o obravnavanih institucijah in organih ter o porabi v letu 2009 so v tabeli 9.1.
Table 9.1 — Administrative expenditure of the institutions — Key information
Tabela 9.1 – Upravni odhodki institucij – ključne informacije
Sections I, II and IV-IX.
Oddelki I, II in IV–IX.
Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct Centralised direct
Za oddelek III, poglavje 1 vseh naslovov in naslovi 14, 24–27 in 29 neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano neposredno centralizirano
European Parliament Council Commission Court of Justice Court of Auditors Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions European Ombudsman European Data Protection Supervisor
Evropski parlament Svet Komisija Sodišče Evropske unije Računsko sodišče Ekonomsko-socialni odbor Odbor regij Evropski varuh človekovih pravic Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov
Total administrative expenditure
Upravni odhodki skupaj
Total operational expenditure
Operativni odhodki skupaj
Source: Annual accounts 2009.
Vir: Letni računovodski izkazi za leto 2009.
This expenditure includes the following titles of the general budget: Title 14 (‘taxation and customs union’), Title 24 (‘fight against fraud’), Title 25 (‘Commission’s policy coordination and legal advice’), Title 26 (‘Commission’s administration’), Title 27 (‘budget’) and Title 29 (‘statistics’).
Ti odhodki zajemajo naslednje naslove splošnega proračuna: naslov 14 („obdavčenje in carinska unija“), naslov 24 („boj proti goljufijam“), naslov 25 („usklajevanje politike Komisije in pravno svetovanje“), naslov 26 („upravna služba Komisije“), naslov 27 („proračun“) in naslov 29 („statistika“).
Some of these titles also include operational expen­diture.
Nekateri od teh naslovov zajemajo tudi operativne odhodke.
Title 27 includes for 2009 an amount of 200 million euro as ‘Temporary and lump-sum compensation for the new Member States’.
Naslov 27 za leto 2009 zajema znesek 200 milijonov EUR kot „začasna in pavšalna nadome­stila za nove države članice“.
For the audit of Adminis­trative expenditure:
Pri revidiranju upravnih odhodkov je Sodišče:
— a sample of 57 transactions, drawn randomly from all the administrative expenditure referred to in paragraphs 9.3 and 9.4, was tested;
— preizkusilo vzorec s 57 transakcijami, naključno izbranimi med vsemi upravnimi odhodki iz odstavkov 9.3 in 9.4,
— the Court assessed the compliance of the supervisory and control systems ( 1 ) applied by each Institution with the requirements of the Financial Regulation;
— ocenilo, ali so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi ( 1), ki jih uporabljajo posamezne institucije, skladni z zahtevami finančne uredbe,
— the Court also reviewed the management representations of four Commission’s Directorates General and Offices primarily responsible for administrative expenditure.
— preučilo tudi poslovodske predstavitve štirih generalnih direktoratov in uradov Komisije, ki so v največji meri odgovorni za upravne odhodke.
(a) engagement of temporary and contract agents in all Insti­tutions,
(a) zaposlovanje začasnih in pogodbenih uslužbencev v vseh institucijah;
(b) payment of social allowances to staff in all Institutions in higher risk areas (household allowance for families without dependent children, national allowances not deducted from those of a similar nature paid by the Institutions when the spouse is deemed to receive income or benefits from outside the Institutions, national allowances deducted from those of a similar nature paid by the Institutions and not updated for more than one year),
(b) izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov uslužbencem v vseh insti­tucijah na področjih z večjim tveganjem (gospodinjski dodatek za družine brez vzdrževanih otrok, nacionalni dodatki, ki se ne odštejejo od podobnih dodatkov, ki jih izplačajo institucije, kadar se šteje, da zakonec prejema prihodke ali dodatke iz virov zunaj institucij, nacionalni dodatki, ki se odštejejo od podobnih dodatkov, ki jih izplačajo institucije in več kot leto dni niso bili posodob­ljeni);
(c) procurement contracts in all Institutions except the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor,
(c) pogodbe za javna naročila v vseh institucijah, razen pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic in Evropskem nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov;
(d) procurement contracts awarded following a negotiated procedure due to urgency in all Institutions except the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor.
(d) pogodbe za javna naročila, ki so bile zaradi nujnih razlogov sklenjene po postopku s pogajanji, v vseh insti­tucijah, razen pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic in Evropskem nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov.
( 1 ) Exante and expost controls, internal audit function, exception reporting and internal control standards.
( 1 ) Predhodne in naknadne kontrole, funkcija notranje revizije, poročanje o izjemah in standardi notranjega kontroliranja.
In addition, the Court performed an in-depth assessment of supervisory and control systems in the Court of Justice, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor.
Poleg tega je Sodišče izvedlo poglobljeno oceno nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov na Sodišču Evropske unije, pri Evropskem varuhu člove­kovih pravic in Evropskem nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov.
This assessment included the examination of an additional sample of transactions of payments relating to human resources and to other adminis­trative expenditure.
Ta ocena je zajemala preučitev dodatnega vzorca plačil, povezanih s kadrovskimi viri in drugimi upravnimi odhodki.
REPLY OF THE COMMISSION
ODGOVOR KOMISIJE
The Commission welcomes the Court of Auditors' positive assessment that the administrative expenditure was free from material error.
Komisija z zadovoljstvom sprejema pozitivno oceno Računskega sodišča, da v upravnih odhodkih ni bilo pomembnih napak.
On the basis of the sample of 57 transactions, the audit found the payments as a whole to be free from material error.
Pri reviziji je bilo na podlagi pregleda vzorca s 57 tran­sakcijami ugotovljeno, da v plačilih kot celoti ni pomembnih napak.
COMPLIANCE OF SYSTEMS WITH THE FINANCIAL REGULATION
SKLADNOST SISTEMOV S FINANČNO UREDBO
The Court’s audit of the compliance of the systems designed to ensure the regularity of transactions with the provisions of the Financial Regulation (see paragraph 9.6) found no material weakness.
Sodišče pri reviziji skladnosti sistemov, zasnovanih za zagota­vljanje pravilnosti transakcij, z določbami finančne uredbe (glej odstavek 9.6) ni našlo pomembnih slabosti.
OBSERVATIONS ON SPECIFIC INSTITUTIONS
OPAŽANJA O POSAMEZNIH INSTITUCIJAH
These findings do not call into question the assessments set out in paragraphs 9.9 and 9.10 as they are not material to administrative expenditure as a whole but are significant in the context of the individual Institution concerned.
Oceni v odstavkih 9.9 in 9.10 zaradi teh ugotovitev nista vprašljivi, ker vpliv teh ugotovitev ni pomemben za upravne odhodke kot celoto, ampak za insti­tucije, na katere se ugotovitve nanašajo.
Engagement of temporary and contractual agents
Zaposlovanje začasnih in pogodbenih uslužbencev
THE REPLY OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
ODGOVORI PARLAMENTA
As regards the documents to be provided as proof of fulfilment of military obligations, Parliament wishes to state the following:
V zvezi z dokumenti, ki dokazujejo spoštovanje vojaških obveznosti, želi Parlament pripomniti naslednje:
Parliament acknowledges that, in the light of the gradual abolition of military service in the Member States, fulfilment of such obligations was not the subject of systematic checks in connection with the recruitment of temporary and contract staff until the start of the second half of 2008.
Parlament priznava, da, glede na postopno ukinjanje vojaških obvez­nosti v posameznih državah članicah, pri zaposlovanju začasnega in pogodbenega osebja do začetka druge polovice leta 2008 ni sistema­tično preverjal spoštovanja teh obveznosti.
However, since then DG Personnel has asked applicants to provide proof of fulfilment of their military obligations.
Vendar pa GD za kadrovske zadeve od takrat naprej od kandidatov zahteva predložitev dokazila o spoštovanju vojaških obveznosti.
The Recruitment and Staff Transfers Unit has a database which gives details of the military obligations to be met in each Member State and systematically verifies that those obligations have been fulfilled when concluding contracts with other servants.
Oddelek za zaposlovanje in prerazporejanje kadrov ima tako bazo podatkov, v kateri so opisane vojaške obveznosti v državah, in siste­matsko preverja spoštovanje teh obveznosti pri sestavi zaposlitvenih pogodb.
The instances of noncompliance highlighted by the Court concern temporary and contract staff recruited by Parliament for the first time prior to the introduction of these systematic checks.
Primeri neskladnosti, ki jih navaja Sodišče, se navezujejo na začasno/ pogodbeno osebje, zaposleno v Evropskem parlamentu prvič in pred uvedenim sistematskim preverjanjem.
Payment of social allowances to staff members
Izplačevanje socialnih dodatkov uslužbencem
As stipulated in Article 67(2) and Article 68 of the Staff Regu­lations, it is for the recipients of allowances to notify the Adminis­tration of any change in their circumstances.
V skladu z določbami člena 67(2) in člena 68 statuta morajo prejemniki nadomestil pristojne službe nemudoma obvestiti o vseh spremembah.
This arrangement, based on ‘spontaneous declarations’, may give rise to delays in updating individual entitlements.
Ta sistem, ki temelji na „spontani izjavi“, lahko privede do morebitne zamude pri posodobitvi individualnih pravic zaposlenih.
This situation leads to the risk of making incorrect or undue payments if the circumstances of the individual have changed.
Zato prihaja do tveganja nepravilnih ali neupravičenih izplačil, če se posameznikove okoliščine spremenijo.
Staff should be requested to deliver at appropriate intervals documents confirming their personal situation.
Od uslužbencev bi morali zahtevati, da v ustreznih razmikih predložijo doku­mente, ki potrjujejo njihove osebne razmere.
In addition, the Parliament should implement a system for the timely monitoring and control of these documents.
Poleg tega bi moral Parlament uporabljati sistem za pravočasno spremljanje in kontrolo teh dokumentov.
With a view to forestalling this risk, Parliament has always taken regular steps to verify the circumstances of its staff.
Za odpravo teh tveganj je Parlament vedno redno preverjal status svojih uslužbencev.
As from 2010, that verification has been computerised through the introduction of the ‘electronic data sheet’.
Od leta 2010 to preverjanje poteka avtomatsko na podlagi „elektronskega obrazca“.
This ‘proactive’ procedure will make it possible to verify staff members’ personal and administrative data at least once a year.
Ta postopek je odslej „proaktiven“ in mora omogočiti najmanj letno preverjanje osebnih in administra­tivnih podatkov uslužbencev.
Each staff member is required to verify his or her circumstances on a given date and to forward notification of any change, along with the requisite supporting documents, to the department concerned.
V okviru tega preverjanja lahko zadevni uslužbenec sam preveri svoj status na dan D in pristojno službo s predložitvijo ustrezne dokumentacije obvesti o morebitnih spre- membah.
Sums unduly paid to officials and other servants who fail to notify the Administration of changes in their circumstances are recovered.
Če uslužbenci pristojnih služb ne obvestijo o spremembah stanja, je treba preveč izplačane zneske vrniti.
Organisation and functioning of political groups
Organizacija in delovanje političnih skupin
Parliament notes the Court’s finding and, in response, intends to discuss the possibility of:
Parlament je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Sodišča in namerava preučiti morebitne možnosti:
— incorporating into the rules governing the use of Item 4 0 0 0 appropriations the requirement that the financial rules adopted by the groups should include a provision laying down the remit and duties of an internal auditor, as provided for in Article 85 of the Financial Regulation,
— da se v pravilnik o uporabi odobrenih sredstev iz proračunske postavke 4 0 0 0 uvede obveznost, da skupine v svoja finančna pravila vključijo formulo za kritje obsega in funkcije notranjega revizorja, kot to določa člen 85 finančne uredbe,
The specific rules on the use of these appropriations ( 3 ) require that each political group estab­lishes its own internal financial rules and implements an internal control system.
Posebna pravila o uporabi teh sredstev ( 3 ) določajo, da mora vsaka politična skupina pripraviti svoja notranja fi- nančna pravila in izvajati notranji kontrolni sistem.
The internal audit function is not mentioned.
Funkcija notranje revizije ni omenjena.
Only the rules of one out of seven political groups provide for the appointment of an internal auditor.
Le ena od sedmih političnih skupin je v svojih pravilih določila, da je treba imenovati notranjega revizorja.
The functional independence of political groups does not justify that regulatory provisions on the internal audit function are not applied as regards the use of funds by political groups.
Funkcionalna neodvisnost političnih skupin ni opravičilo, da se za sredstva, ki jih slednje porabljajo, ne uporabljajo uredbene določbe o funkciji notranje revizije.
— allowing the groups either to appoint an internal auditor (if their size permits) or to confer those duties on an external auditor, on the understanding that he or she is not the external auditor responsible for examining the group’s accounts.
— da se skupinam zagotovi možnost uporabe bodisi notranjega revizorja (če velikost skupine to dopušča), ali da se to delo zaupa zunanjemu revizorju, pod pogojem, da ne gre za istega zunanjega revizorja, ki pregleduje računovodske izkaze skupine.
They allow political groups to carryover to the succeeding financial years unused appropriations of a given year, without having to justify this decision ( 4 ).
Te lahko neporabljena odobrena proračunska sredstva danega leta prenesejo v naslednja proračunska leta brez utemeljitve ( 4 ).
These specific provisions, which introduced an exception to the budgetary principle of annuality, do not find a legal basis in the Financial Regulation.
Te posebne določbe, s katerimi je bila uvedena izjema pri proračunskem načelu enoletnosti, nimajo pravne podlage v finančni uredbi.
A distinction should be drawn between the budgetary operations conducted by the authorising officer by delegation — who commits and pays appropriations from budget Item 4 0 0 0 in full compliance with the Financial Regulation, and in particular the principle of annuality — and the management of the resources of each political group, which is governed by specific rules adopted by the Bureau on 30 June 2003.
Treba je razlikovati proračunske operacije odredbodajalca, ki uporablja sredstva iz proračunske postavke 4 0 0 0 popolnoma v skladu s finančno uredbo, zlasti z načelom enoletnosti, ter upravljanje vsake izmed skupin nad sredstvi v skladu s posebnim pravilnikom, ki ga je sprejelo predsedstvo 30. junija 2003.
Those rules take account of the constraints imposed by the specific nature of the political groups’ role and make explicit provision for the carryover procedure referred to by the Court.
Ta pravilnik je bil oblikovan, da bi se upoštevale vse posebne potrebe delovanja političnih skupin, in izrecno predvideva postopek, ki ga omenja sodišče.
REPLY OF THE COUNCIL
ODGOVOR SVETA
In conformity with Article 149.1 of the Implementing Rules, the General Secretariat of the Council informs systematically and without delay all candidates participating in a tender procedure of the outcome of the procedure as soon as the contracting authority has decided on the award of the contract.
V skladu s členom 149.1 izvedbenih pravil generalni sekretariat Sveta vse kandidate, ki sodelujejo pri razpisnem postopku, sistema­tično in nemudoma obvesti o izidu postopka, takoj ko se naročnik odloči o oddaji naročila.
In addition, the award notice mentioned in Article 118.4 of the Implementing Rules is sent by the central procurement department for publication by the Publications Office as soon as the contract is signed by the authorising officer.
Poleg tega osrednja služba za javna naročila obvestilo o oddaji naročila iz člena 118.4 izvedbenih pravil pošlje v objavo Uradu za publikacije takoj, ko pogodbo podpiše odredbodajalec.
Unfortunately, in the two cases identified by the Court, the latter informed the central procurement department too late and the delay mentioned in Article 118.4 of the IR was not respected.
Žal Računsko sodišče v dveh odkritih primerih ni pravočasno obvestilo osrednje službe za javna naročila, zato rok iz člena 118.4 izvedbenih pravil ni bil spoštovan.
( 3 ) Rules adopted by the Bureau of the European Parliament on 30 June 2003, as amended by decisions of 22 March 2006 and
( 3 ) Ta pravila je 30. junija 2003 sprejelo predsedstvo Evropskega parla­menta, pozneje pa so bila spremenjena s sklepoma z dne 22. marca
( 4 ) At the end of the financial year 2008, appropriations carried over by political groups amounted to 22 million euro, i.e. 42,5 % of the annual appropriations for 2008.
( 4 ) Ob koncu proračunskega leta 2008 so odobrena proračunska sred­stva, ki so jih politične skupine prenesle v naslednje leto, znašala 22 milijonov EUR, kar je 42,5 % odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za leto 2008.
It should be noted that the in the two cases cited by the European Court of Auditors (both with a very limited number of candidates), the latter have no grounds for complaint since they were informed individually immediately of the award decision.
Opozoriti je treba, da v primerih, ki ju je navedlo Evropsko računsko sodišče (oba z zelo majhnim številom kandidatov), kandidati nimajo razlogov za pritožbo, saj so bili posamično takoj obveščeni o dodelitvi naročila.
The Office for Administration and Payments of Individual Entitlements (PMO) has already taken action to catch up delays in the control of national social allowances and will follow up the detected cases.
Urad za vodenje in plačevanje posameznih pravic (PMO) je že sprejel ukrepe za zmanjšanje zamud pri kontroli nacionalnih socialnih doda­tkov in bo spremljal razvoj navedenih primerov.
Between mid October 2009 and end of April 2010, 348 files out of 598 files have been opened and already 243 files have been closed.
Od sredine oktobra 2009 do konca aprila 2010 je bilo odprtih 348 od 598 primerov, 243 pa jih je že zaprtih.
Controls will continue further.
Kontrole se bodo še naprej izvajale.
In four other cases, the amounts deducted did not reflect the latest applicable value of benefits paid by national authorities.
V drugih štirih primerih odšteti zneski niso odražali zadnje veljavne vrednosti prejemkov, ki jih izplačujejo nacionalni organi.
The IT systems used to manage these payments should be further developed to ensure that the amounts of allowances paid by national authorities are updated automatically.
Informacijske sisteme za upravljanje teh izplačil bi bilo treba še naprej razvijati, da se zagotovi samodejno posodabljanje zneskov, ki jih izplačujejo nacionalni organi.
It is foreseen to build in the new system the possibility to update automatically national allowances, but it will not be possible to put this module into operation before the beginning of 2011.
Predvideno je, da se v novi sistem vključi možnost samodejnega posodabljanja dodatkov, ki jih izplačujejo nacionalni organi, vendar ta modul pred začetkom leta 2011 ne bo mogel začeti delovati.
However, from that moment onwards, allowances will be corrected retroactively and recovered according to article 85 of the Staff regulations.
Od takrat naprej pa se bodo dodatki popravljali za nazaj in izterjevali v skladu s členom 85 kadrovskih predpisov.
The Commission (DG RELEX) takes note of this observation and will address this problem with the provision of timely and adequate information to officials and with regular checks.
Komisija (GD RELEX) bo to pripombo upoštevala in ta problem obravnavala tako, da bo uslužbencem zagotavljala pravočasne in ustrezne informacije ter izvajala redne kontrole.
There are checks on the personal situation of staff when new staff arrives to take up their posts.
Ko novi uslužbenci začnejo delati, se preveri njihov osebni status.