natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the same way as all holders of such rights, Infront is concerned by the contested decision only in its objective capacity as a broker of television broadcasting rights to sporting events having purchased those rights for one of the designated events.
Tako kot vse imetnike teh pravic bi tudi družbo Infront sporni akt zadeval le glede njene objektivne zmožnosti kot posrednice pravic televizijskih prenosov �portnih dogodkov, ki je navedene pravice kupila za enega izmed dogodkov, ki jih je določilo Združeno kraljestvo.
Moreover, holders of television broadcasting rights such as Infront are subject only to the economic consequences of the national measures approved by the contested decision.
Poleg tega naj bi imetniki pravic televizijskih prenosov, kot je družba Infront, nosili le ekonomske posledice nacionalnih ukrepov, ki so bili potrjeni s spornim aktom.
An undertaking cannot be individually concerned by a regulatory provision solely on the ground that it affects its economic activity and that is the more so if such consequences are a normal commercial risk.
Določba naj torej podjetja ne bi posamično zadevala le zaradi dejstva, ker vpliva na njegovo gospodarsko dejavnost, in to �e toliko bolj, če te posledice izhajajo iz običajnega tržnega tveganja.
The contested decision does not affect Infront by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to it or by reason of circumstances in which it is differentiated from all other persons.
Sporni akt naj torej ne bi prizadel družbe Infront zaradi določenih lastnosti, ki naj bi jih imel, ali dejanskega položaja, ki je značilen zanj v odnosu do vseh drugih oseb.
Infront submits that the Court of First Instance correctly noted the matters which distinguish it from others, namely that it holds exclusive television broadcasting rights for an event in the list of designated events, that those rights were acquired before the establishment of that list and its approval by the Commission, and that such approval seriously prejudices the exploitation by Infront of those rights since it cannot license them on an exclusive basis.
Družba Infront meni, da je Sodi�če prve stopnje pravilno ugotovilo elemente, po katerih se razlikuje od drugih oseb, in sicer da ima izključne pravice televizijskega prenosa za dogodek s seznama dogodkov, da je te pravice pridobila, preden je bil ta seznam sestavljen in ga je odobrila Komisija, in da ta odobritev resno �kodi družbi Infront pri izkori�čanju teh pravic, ker zanje ne more dati izključne licence.
As the Advocate General observed in paragraphs 99 and 100 of his Opinion, that can be the case particularly when the decision alters rights acquired by the individual prior to its adoption (see, particularly, Joined Cases 106/63 and 107/63 Toepfer and Getreide­Import Gesellschaft v Commission [1965] ECR 405, at 411).
Kot je ugotovil generalni pravobranilec v točkah 99 in 100 svojih sklepnih predlogov, gre za to lahko predvsem takrat, kadar odločba posega v pravice, ki jih je posameznik pridobil pred njeno izdajo (glej zlasti sodbo z dne 1. julija 1965 v združenih zadevah Toepfer in Getreide-Import Gesellschaft proti Komisiji, 106/63 in 107/63, Recueil, str. 525, 533).
Infront held exclusive television broadcasting rights, for 2002 and 2006, to the FIFA World Cup finals, which is one of the events in the list of designated events notified to the Commission and approved by the contested decision.
Družba Infront je imela za leti 2002 in 2006 izključne pravice televizijskega prenosa sklepnega dela svetovnega prvenstva FIFE, ki je eden izmed dogodkov s seznama dogodkov, ki je bil prigla�en Komisiji in odobren s spornim aktom.
It is, furthermore, common ground that Infront acquired those exclusive rights prior to the adoption of the contested decision and that, at that time, there were only six companies which had made substantial investments in the acquisition of television broadcasting rights to events in that list.
Poleg tega ni sporno, da je družba Infront te izključne pravice pridobila pred izdajo spornega akta ter da je v tistem času obstajalo le �est družb, ki so veliko investirale v nakup pravic televizijskega prenosa dogodkov z navedenega seznama.
It follows that Infront was perfectly identifiable at the time when the contested decision was adopted.
Iz tega izhaja, da je bila družba Infront v trenutku, ko je bil sprejet sporni akt, popolnoma prepoznavna.
Finally, it follows from paragraphs 51 and 52 of the present judgment that the contested decision affected the members of the group formed of those six companies, which include Infront, by reason of an attribute which is peculiar to them, that is to say as holders of the exclusive television broadcasting rights to designated events.
Končno, iz točk 51 in 52 te sodbe izhaja, da je sporni akt zadeval člane skupine, sestavljene iz zgoraj navedenih �estih družb, katere del je bila tudi družba Infront, zaradi lastnosti, ki naj bi jih imele, in sicer ker so bile imetnice izključnih pravic televizijskega prenosa dogodkov s seznama dogodkov.
In those circumstances, the Court of First Instance correctly concluded that the contested decision was of individual concern to Infront.
Glede na to je Sodi�če prve stopnje pravilno ugotovilo, da je sporni akt družbo Infront posamično zadeval.
Accordingly, the second ground of appeal must be rejected as unfounded and, therefore, the appeal must be dismissed in its entirety.
Zato je treba drugi pritožbeni razlog zavrniti kot neutemeljen in zato zavrniti pritožbo v celoti.
Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, which applies to appeal proceedings by virtue of Article 118 thereof, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings.
V skladu s členom 69(2) Poslovnika, ki velja za pritožbeni postopek na podlagi člena 118 tega poslovnika, se neuspeli stranki naloži plačilo stro�kov, če so bili ti prigla�eni.
Since Infront has applied for costs and the Commission has been unsuccessful, the Commission must be ordered to pay the costs.
Ker je družba Infront predlagala, naj se Komisiji naloži plačilo stro�kov, in ker slednja s svojimi predlogi ni uspela, se ji naloži plačilo stro�kov.
On those grounds, the Court (Fourth Chamber) hereby:
Iz teh razlogov je Sodi�če (četrti senat) razsodilo:
Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.
Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti se naloži plačilo stroškov.
Case C-285/06
Zadeva C-285/06
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht)
(Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Bundesverwaltungsgericht)
Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Wine — Designation and presenta­tion of wines — Regulations Nos 1493/1999 and 753/2002
Kmetijstvo – Skupna ureditev trgov – Vino – Opis in predstavitev vin – Uredbi št. 1493/1999 in št. 753/2002
(Council Regulation No 1493/1999, Art. 47(2)(c) and Annex VII, point B(1)(b), fifth indent, and (3); Commission Regulation No 753/2002, Arts 6(1) and 23)
(Uredba Sveta št. 1493/1999, člen 47(2)(c) in priloga VII, B, točki (1)(b), peta alinea, in (3); Uredba Komisije št. 753/2002, člena 6(1) in 23)
SUMMARY — CASE C-285/06
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-285/06
(Commission Regulation No 753/2002, Art. 24(2)(a), and Annex III)
(Uredba Komisije št. 753/2002, člen 24(2)(a) in priloga III)
(Commission Regulation No 753/2002, Art. 24(2) and Annex III)
(Uredba Komisije št. 753/2002, člen 24(2) in priloga III)
issue in the main proceedings are likely to give rise to such a risk.
v postopku v glavni stvari povzročijo tak�no tveganje.
(see paras 28, 29, 31, 32, operative part 1)
(Glej točke 28, 29, 31, 32 in točko 1 izreka.)
It is for the national court to assess whether the terms in
Predložitveno sodi�če mora presoditi, ali lahko zadevne označbe
SCHNEIDER a language other than that in which that term is given in Annex III to that regulation, if that translation is likely to cause confusion or to mislead the persons to whom it is addressed.
SCHNEIDER je naveden v prilogi III k tej uredbi, pomeni zavajanje ali namigovanje na tradicionalni izraz v smislu te določbe, če lahko tak prevod povzroči zmedo ali zavajanje oseb, ki jim je namenjen.
It is for the national court to examine whether that is the case in the dispute before it.
Predložitveno sodi�če mora preučiti, ali gre v postopku, v katerem odloča, za tak primer.
and protection of certain wine sector products, as amended by Regulation No 1512/2005, is to be interpreted as meaning that a traditional term listed in Annex III to that regulation is protected both with regard to wines of the same category or categories from the same producer Member State as that traditional term and with regard to wines of the same category or categories from other producer Member States.
predstavitve in za�čite nekaterih proizvodov iz vinskega sektorja, kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo �t. 1512/2005, je treba razlagati tako, da se za� -čita tradicionalnega izraza, navedenega v pri logi III k tej uredbi, nana�a tako na vina iste kategorije oziroma kategorij, ki izvirajo iz iste države članice proizvajalke kot za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz, kot tudi na vina iste kategorije oziroma kategorij, ki izvirajo iz drugih držav članic proizvajalk.
(see paras 39, 43, 44, operative part 2)
(Glej točke 39, 43, 44 in točko 2 izreka.)
(see paras 53, 55, 56, 58, operative part 3)
(Glej točke 53, 55, 56, 58 in točko 3 izreka.)
Other traditional designations for wines are indicated on labels where wine is sold and in legal relations.
Dodatne tradicionalne označbe za vina so pri prodaji in v pravnem prometu navedene na etiketi.
Labels could have the same meaning for wines as passports and identity cards have for individuals.
Etikete bi lahko imele enak pomen za vina kot potni listi in osebne izkaznice za osebe.
They are either universally recognised or limited to one (Member) State. 5
Priznane so ali povsod ali pa so omejene zgolj na eno državo (članico). 5
(c) the smooth operation of the internal market;
(b) za�čita legitimnih interesov proizvajalcev;
A — Regulation No 1493/1999
A – Uredba št. 1493/1999
(d) the promotion of the production of quality products.
(d) pospe�evanje proizvodnje kakovostnih proizvodov.
Regulation No 1493/1999 governs the production, labelling and control of wine sector products and inter alia lays down rules relating to certain particulars in connection with labelling.
Uredba �t. 1493/1999 ureja proizvodnjo, etiketiranje in nadzor vinskih proizvodov in med drugim določa pravila za nekatere podatke pri označevanju.
The rules mentioned in paragraph 1 shall include, in particular, provisions:
Pravila, navedena v odstavku 1, zajemajo zlasti določbe o:
Article 47 of Regulation No 1493/1999 states:
V členu 47 Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 je določeno:
(a) making the use of certain terms compulsory;
(a) obvezni uporabi nekaterih podatkov;
Rules relating to the description, designation and presentation of certain products covered by this Regulation, and the protection of certain particulars and terms are set out in this Chapter and in Annexes VII and VIII.
Pravila o poimenovanju, označevanju in predstavitvi nekaterih proizvodov iz te uredbe ter za�čita nekaterih podatkov in pojmov so določeni v tem poglavju in v prilogah VII in VIII.
The rules shall take into account, in particular, the following objectives:
Pri teh pravilih se upo�tevajo zlasti naslednji cilji:
(c) permitting the use of other terms, including information which may be useful for consumers;
(c) dovoljeni uporabi drugih podatkov, vključno z informacijami, ki so lahko koristne za potro�nike;
(d) governing protection and arrangements for certain terms;
(d) za�čiti in nadzoru nekaterih podatkov; ali z dodatki, kakor so ‚vrsta‘, ‚tip‘, ‚slog‘, ‚imitacija‘, ‚znamka‘ ali podobno,
(e) governing the use of geographical indications and traditional terms;
(e) uporabi geografskih označb in tradicionalnih poimenovanj;
Article 49 of Regulation No 1493/1999 states:
V členu 49 Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 je določeno:
Article 48 of Regulation No 1493/1999 states:
V členu 48 Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 je določeno:
Products whose description or presentation does not conform to the provisions of this Regulation or the detailed rules adopted for its implementation may not be held for sale or put on the market in the Community or exported.
Proizvodi, katerih opis ali predstavitev ni v skladu s predpisi te uredbe ali podrobnimi pravili, sprejetimi za njihovo izvajanje, se ne smejo prodajati ali dati v promet na trg v Skupnosti ali izvažati.
‘The description and presentation of the products referred to in this Regulation, and any form of advertising for such products, must not be incorrect or likely to cause confusion or to mislead the persons to whom they are addressed, particularly as regards:
„Opis in predstavitev proizvodov, navedenih v tej uredbi, in vse oblike ogla�evanja teh proizvodov ne smejo biti neustrezni ali povzročati zmede ali zavajanja oseb, katerim so namenjeni, zlasti glede na:
— the information provided for in Article 47.
– informacije, predvidene v členu 47.
This shall apply even if the information is used in translation or with a reference to the actual provenance or
To velja tudi, če se informacije uporabljajo v prevodu ali v zvezi z dejanskim izvorom
The Member State on whose territory the product whose description or presentation does not conform to the provisions referred to in paragraph 1 is located shall take the necessary steps to impose penalties in respect of infringements committed, according to their gravity.
Država članica, na ozemlju katere je proizvod, ki njegov opis ali predstavitev ne ustreza določbam, navedenim v odstavku 1, sprejme potrebne ukrepe za kaznovanje kr�itev glede na njihovo resnost.
(b) in the case of table wines with geographical indication and quality wines psr:
SCHNEIDER b) za namizna vina z geografsko označbo in kakovostna vina pdpo:
The Member State may, however, grant an authorisation for the product to be held for sale, put on the market in the Community or exported, provided that its description or presentation is changed to conform to the provisions referred to in paragraph 1.’
Država članica lahko odobri, da se zadevni proizvod v Skupnosti proda, dá v promet na trg v Skupnosti ali izvozi, če se spremeni opis ali predstavitev tega proizvoda, pod pogojem, da ustreza določbam odstavka 1.“
— other traditional terms in accordance with the provisions laid down by the Member State of production,
— drugi tradicionalni izrazi, v skladu z določbami, postavljenimi v državi članici, v kateri je bilo vino proizvedeno,
Article 53 of Regulation No 1493/1999 provides for the adoption of detailed rules for the implementation of the regulation, including Annexes VII and VIII.
V členu 53 Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 je predvideno sprejetje pravil za izvajanje te uredbe, med drugim poglavij VII in VIII.
The implementing rules govern in particular the derogations, conditions and authorisations provided for in those Annexes.
Ta pravila veljajo zlasti za odstopanja, pogoje in dovoljenja, predvidena v teh prilogah.
Implementing rules should also be adopted on the legal basis of Article 53 also for the labelling of table wine, table wine with geographical indication and quality wine psr.
V skladu s pravno podlago člena 53 naj bi se sprejela pravila za izvajanje v zvezi z označevanjem namiznega vina, namiznega vina, opisanega z geografsko označbo, in kakovostnega vina pdpo.
Point B of Annex VII of Regulation No 1493/1999 provides with regard to optional particulars:
V točki B Priloge VII k Uredbi �t. 1493/1999 v zvezi z neobveznimi navedbami je določeno:
In the case of the products referred to in paragraph 1 of point A, the labelling may be supplemented by other particulars.
Za proizvode, ki jih navaja odstavek 1 točke A, se označevanje lahko dopolni z drugimi podatki.
The labelling of the products obtained in the Community may be supplemented by the following particulars, under conditions to be determined:
Označevanje proizvodov, ki so bili proizvedeni v Skupnosti, se lahko dopolni z naslednjimi podatki, pod pogoji, ki se posebej določijo:
Member States of production may make certain particulars in paragraphs 1 and 2 compulsory, prohibit them or restrict their use in respect of wines produced in their territory.’
Država članica proizvajalka lahko za vina, proizvedena na njenem ozemlju, nekatere podatke v odstavkih 1 in 2 predpi�e, prepove ali omeji njihovo uporabo.“
With regard to languages which may be used for the labelling, point D of Annex VII provides as follows: shall be given solely in one of the official languages of the Member State in whose territory the product was prepared.
V zvezi z jeziki, ki se jih lahko uporabi za etiketiranje, je v točki D iste priloge določeno: dani le v enem od uradnih jezikov države članice, na ozemlju katere je bil proizvod pripravljen.
The information on the labelling must be given in one or more other official languages of the Community so that the final consumer can easily understand each of these items of information.
Informacije na etiketah so dane v enem ali več uradnih jezikih Skupnosti, tako da končni potro�nik dobro razume vsak posamezen podatek.
The information referred to in the second subparagraph may be repeated in one or more other official languages of the Community for products originating in Greece and Cyprus.
Za proizvode, ki izvirajo iz Grčije in Cipra, se informacije iz prej�njega pododstavka lahko ponovijo v enem ali več uradnih jezikih Skupnosti.
Notwithstanding the first subparagraph:
Kljub temu so:
— the name of the specified region,
– pridelovalnega ime določenega območja,
— the name of another geographical unit,
– ime druge geografske enote,
In the case of products obtained and put on the market in their territory, Member States may allow the information referred to in the second subparagraph also to be given in a language other than an official language of the Community, if use of that language is traditional and customary in the Member State concerned or in part of its territory.
Za proizvode, dobljene in dane na trg na njihovih ozemljih, lahko države članice dovolijo, da se informacije, navedene v drugem pododstavku, dajo v jeziku, ki ni uradni jezik Skupnosti, če je uporaba tega jezika v tej državi članici ali na delu njenega ozemlja tradicionalna in običajna.
— the traditional specific terms and the additional traditional particulars,
– in posebni tradicionalni izrazi dodatni tradicionalni podatki,
Member States of production may allow, in respect of their products, the information referred to in the second subparagraph also to be given in another language if use of that language is traditional for such particulars …’ the name of the vineyards or their associations and bottling particulars
Države članice proizvajalke lahko dovolijo, da se v zvezi z njihovimi proizvodi informacije, navedene v drugem pododstavku, dajo tudi v drugem jeziku, če je uporaba tega jezika za tak�ne podatke tradicionalna […]“
B — Regulation No 753/2002 acts in compliance with the general procedural rules adopted by the Member State, require bottlers, consignors or importers to provide proof of the accuracy of the wording used for the description as it relates to the nature, identity, quality, composition, origin or source of the product concerned or the products used to make it.’
B – Uredba št. 753/2002 upo�tevanju splo�nih postopkovnih pravil države članice, od polnilcev, po�iljateljev ali uvoznikov dokazilo o točnosti navedb, uporabljenih za opise, ki se nana�ajo na vrsto, istovetnost, kakovost, sestavo, poreklo ali vir zadevnega proizvoda ali proizvodov, uporabljenih pri njegovi proizvodnji.“
Article 6 of that regulation contains the following rules common to all particulars on labelling:
Člen 6 te uredbe vsebuje skupne predpise za vse navedbe na etiketi:
For the purposes of Annex VII(B)(3) to Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999, the labelling of the products covered by that Annex may be supplemented by other particulars provided that there is no risk that such particulars might mislead those to whom they are addressed, particularly by creating confusion with the compulsory particulars referred to in paragraph A(1) or the optional particulars referred to in paragraph B(1) of that Annex.
Za namene Priloge VII(B)(3) k Uredbi (ES) �t. 1493/1999 se lahko označevanje proizvodov, urejenih v navedeni prilogi, dopolni tudi z drugimi navedbami, če ni tveganja, da bi lahko te navedbe zavajale osebe zlasti z možnostjo zamenjave z obveznimi navedbami iz odstavka A(l) ali z neobveznimi navedbami iz odstavka B(l) navedene priloge.
Article 24 of Regulation No 753/2002 further provides with regard to protection of traditional terms:
Uredba �t. 753/2002 v členu 24 dalje določa za�čito tradicionalnih izrazov:
In the case of the products referred to in Annex VII(B)(3) to Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999, an authority designated under Article 72(1) thereof may, provided that it
Pri proizvodih iz Priloge VII(B)(3) k Uredbi (ES) �t. 1493/1999 lahko zahteva organ iz člena 72(1) navedene uredbe, ob
For the purposes of this Article, “traditional terms” means the additional traditional
Za namene tega člena ‚tradicionalni izrazi‘ pomenijo dodatne tradicionalne
Trade marks used to describe a wine on its labelling may not contain traditional terms listed in Annex III unless the wine qualifies for such a traditional term.
Blagovne znamke, ki vsebujejo tradicionalne izraze iz Priloge III, se smejo uporabiti za opis vina na njegovi nalepki samo, če vino izpolnjuje pogoje za označevanje s takim tradicionalnim izrazom.
If a traditional term listed in Annex III to this Regulation also falls within one of the categories of indication referred to in Annex VII(A) and (B)(1) and (2) to Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999, the provisions of this Article rather than the other provisions of Title IV or Title V shall apply to that traditional term.
Če tradicionalni izraz, naveden v Prilogi III k tej uredbi, spada tudi v katero izmed kategorij navedb iz Prilog VII(A) in (B)(1) in (2) k Uredbi (ES) �t.
(a) all misuse, imitation or evocation, even if the protected term is accompanied by an expression such as “kind”, “type”, “style”, “imitation”, “brand” or similar;
1493/1999, veljajo za tak tradicionalni izraz določbe tega člena namesto drugih določb naslova IV ali naslova V.
The protection of a traditional term shall apply only for the language(s) in which it appears in Annex III.
Za�čita tradicionalnega izraza velja samo za jezik(-e), v katerem(-ih) je navedena v Prilogi III.
(b) any other unwarranted, false or misleading indication as to the nature or essential qualities of the wine on the inner or outer packaging, advertising material or any documents relating to it;
(b) kakr�no koli drugo nepoobla�čeno, napačno ali zavajajočo navedbo glede lastnosti ali bistvenih kakovosti vina na notranji ali zunanji strani embalaže, ogla�evalskem materialu ali kakr�nem koli drugem dokumentu, ki se nana�a na vino;
Each traditional term listed in Annex III shall be linked to one or more categories of wine.
Vsak tradicionalni izraz, naveden v Prilogi III, je povezan z eno ali več kategorijami vina. Te kategorije so:
(c) any other practice liable to mislead the public, in particular to give the impression that the wine qualifies for the protected traditional term.
(c) kakr�nim koli drugim ravnanjem, ki bi lahko zavedlo javnost, zlasti glede ustvarjanja vtisa, da vino izpolnjuje pogoje za poimenovanje z za�čitenim tradicionalnim izrazom.
(d) be used for one or more Community wines or categories of Community wine.
(d) v uporabi za eno ali več vin ali kategorij vin v Skupnosti.
(d) quality wines psr not covered by (a), (b) or (c) above and table wines with a geographical indication; in this case the protection of a traditional term shall apply only to the designation of wines other than liqueur wines, sparkling wines, aerated sparkling wines, semisparkling wines and aerated semisparkling wines;
(d) kakovostna vina pdpo, razen tistih iz točk (a), (b) ali (c), in namizna vina z geografsko označbo; v tem primeru velja za�čita tradicionalnega izraza samo za poimenovanje nelikerskih vin, penečih vin, gaziranih penečih vin, vin biser in gaziranih vin biser;