natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
During the period 2004–05, OLAF examined in all 28 initiatives.
Urad je za obdobje 2004–2005 preučil skupaj 28 pobud.
In its overall strategic approach, adopted on 28 June 2000 (3) in the context of the inclusion of Article 280 EC in the Amsterdam Treaty and the creation in 1999 of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the Commission adopted its political and general objectives for the period 2001–05.
Komisija je v splošnem strateškem pristopu, sprejetem 28. junija 2000(3), ki sledi vključitvi člena 280 Pogodbe ES (PES) v Amsterdamsko pogodbo in ustanovitvi Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) leta 1999, določila politične in splošne cilje za obdobje 2001–2005.
It identified four main strategic guidelines for the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests:
Komisija je določila štiri pomembne smernice za zaščito nančnih interesov:
• an overall legislative antifraud policy;
– splošno zakonodajno politiko boja proti goljufijam; jam;
• a new culture of operational cooperation;
– novo kulturo sodelovanja;
• an interinstitutional approach to prevent and combat corruption; e introduction of the euro was accompanied throughout the programming period in question by numerous measures to combat the counterfeiting of euro coins and notes.
Uvedbo eura so v celotnem zadevnem programskem obdobju spremljali številni ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti za boj proti ponarejanju kovancev in bankovcev.
Among the measures adopted, the Commission enhanced the legal framework for action and intervention, as well as the framework for international cooperation on specific matters.
Komisija je predvsem okrepila pravni okvir dejavnosti in posredovanja ter okvir za posebno mednarodno sodelovanje.
• enhancement of the penal judicial dimension.
– okrepitev kazenskopravne razsežnosti.
e implementation of this overall strategic approach was
Ta splošna strategija se je začela izvajati z akcijskima
5) given practical shape in the 2001–03 (action plans.
načrtoma za obdobji 2001–2003(
In a 2002 communication (7) focusing on improving the recovery of unduly paid agricultural funds prior to 1999, the Commission announced the establishment of a Recovery Task Force (RTF) to clarify the situation of unrecovered debts and to draw up decisions on nancial liability under the formal accounts-clearance procedure in the EAGGF Guarantee Section (see point 4.3).
Komisija je v sporočilu iz leta 2002(7), ki se je nanašalo zlasti na izboljšanje postopka izterjave kmetijskih sredstev, ki so bila nepravilno izplačana pred letom 1999, napovedala vzpostavitev „projektne skupine za izterjavo“ (Recovery Task Force – RTF), da bi se razjasnil položaj neizterjave in pripravile odločitve o nančni odgovornosti v okviru formalnega postopka potrjevanja računov na področju Jamstvenega sklada EKUJS (glej točko 4.3).
) Communication from the Commission — ‘Protecting the Communities’ nancial interests — Fight against fraud — For an overall strategic approach’ (COM(2000) 358 nal).
Nova nančna uredba(8), ki je začela veljati leta 2003, znatno krepi zaščito nančnih interesov Skupnosti:
) Communication from the Commission — ‘Protecting the Communities’
Komisija si je prizadevala za to, da bi bila politika boja proti goljufijam urejena s horizontalnim zakonodajnim
legislation and contract management of 7 November 2001 (SEC(2001) 2029 nal).
) Sporočilo Komisije o onemogočanju goljufij prek zakonodaje in upravljanja s pogodbami z dne 7. novembra 2001, SEC(2001) 2029 konč.
) Communication from the Commission — ‘Protecting the Communities’
) Sporočilo Komisije o zaščiti nančnih interesov Skupnosti – Boj proti uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti, UL L 248, 16.9.2002.
nancial interests — Fight against fraud — Action plan for 2004–05’ (COM(2004) 544 nal).
goljufijam – Akcijski načrt 2004–2005, COM(2004) 544 konč.
• It makes for more e ective recovery.
– Predvsem izboljšuje učinkovitost postopka izterjave.
• It makes provision for a move from cash-based toaccrual accounting.
– Določa prehod z računovodstva na podlagi izplačil na računovodstvo na podlagi nastanka poslovnih dogodkov.
Since 2005 the Commission has therefore been in compliance with the strictest international accounting standards, has improved its day-to-day management of funds and has reduced to a minimum the risk of errors or irregularities.
Komisija od leta 2005 torej spoštuje najzahtevnejše mednarodne računovodske standarde v javnem sektorju, izboljšuje vsakodnevno upravljanje sredstev in zmanjšuje tveganja napak ali nepravilnosti.
In the light of these developments, the Commission adopted in May 2006 a proposal supplementing the progress made in its proposal of February 2004, which it has replaced and which has been withdrawn. is proposal deals in particular with governance and the cooperation between the institutions and the Supervisory Committee via thelatter’s meetings with the representatives of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission under the structured dialogue.
nadomešča in umika. Ta predlog posebej obravnava upravljanje in sodelovanje med institucijami in Nadzornim odborom na srečanjih slednjega s predstavniki Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije v okviru strukturiranega dialoga.
It also makes provision for the establishment of a review adviser to formulate opinions for a certain number of cases and is designed to clarify the mandate of the Director-General of OLAF.
Predvideva tudi imenovanje svetovalca revizorja, ki bi izdajal mnenja v določenem številu primerov, in namerava razjasniti mandat generalnega direktorja OLAF.
Events in 2005.
Dogodki v letu 2005.
In 2005, the Commission adopted its sec- ond report (16) on the application by the Member States of the ‘black list regulation’ (17). is regulation provides for
Komisija je v letu 2005 sprejela drugo poročilo (16
• It provides for an information system that makes it possible to exclude from public contracts by means of an administrative decision unreliable candidates and tenderers with criminal convictions or who provide misleading or fraudulent information.
– Predvideva informacijski sistem, ki omogoča, da se z upravno odločbo iz postopkov javnih naročil izključijo ponudniki, ki so bili obsojeni v kazenskem postopku, in kandidati, ki so nezanesljivi ali so predložili zavajajoče ali goljufive podatke.
A similar mechanism was adopted under the directive on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (9).
Podoben mehanizem je bil sprejet z direktivo o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj(9).
In the context of its communication on transparency (10), the Commission intends to study the possibility of making greater use of the exclusion system and to produce proposals in this respect in the amended proposal concerning the nancial regulation (11).
Komisija je v sporočilu opreglednosti(10) predvidela preučitev možnosti doslednejše uporabe sistema izključitve in namerava pripraviti predloge v zvezi s tem v spremenjenem članicah.
the identification of economic operators that present a risk to the Community budget in the eld of the EAGGF Guarantee Section, the notification of the Commission and the Member States, and the implementation of preventive measures. e report found that the results of the application of the regulation had been modest.
Ta uredba predvideva identifikacijo gospodarskih subjektov, ki pomenijo tveganje za proračun Skupnosti na področju Jamstvenega sklada-EKUJS, obveščanje Komisije in držav članic ter uporabo preventivnih ukrepov. Poročilo ugotavlja, da so rezultati izvajanja te uredbe skromni.
Via this report, the Commission hopes to provoke a wide-ranging debate with the institutions on the need and possible guidelines for a potential reform of the exclusion mechanism.
Komisija želi s tem poročilom spodbuditi obsežno razpravo z institucijami o nujnosti in možnih usmeritvah morebitne reforme mehanizma izključitve.
A new culture of operational cooperation
predlogu o reviziji nančne uredbe(
In 2004, the Commission adopted proposals amending the basic regulations governing investigations by OLAF (12). e aim of these proposals was, among other things, to clarify the rules on information exchanges between OLAF and Community institutions, agencies and organisations, and to allow OLAF to concentrate on its operationalpriorities and to speed up its investigations, thereby enhancing its e ectiveness. e proposals also aimed at strengthening the procedural rights of those under investigation.
Komisija je leta 2004 sprejela predloge uredb o spremembi uredb o preiskavah, ki jih opravlja OLAF(12), katerih namen je bil predvsem razjasniti pravila o izmenjavi informacij med Uradom in institucijami, uradi in agencijami Skupnosti ter Uradu omogočiti, da se osredotoči na svoje operativne prednostne naloge in pospeši preiskave ter tako poveča svojo učinkovitost.
On the basis of these proposals, the European Parliament and the Council called for a complementary assessment of the performance of OLAF, which the Commission presented in October 2004 (13). e Court of Auditors pro-
Namen predlogov je bil tudi okrepiti postopkovne pravice preiskovanih oseb. Evropski parlament in Svet sta na podlagi teh predlogov zahtevala dodatno oceno delovanja Urada, ki jo je Komisija predložila oktobra 2004(13).
) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the nancial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002).
2005(15) organiziral javno obravnavo o okrepitvi OLAF,na kateri je bilo ugotovljeno, da organizacijska struktura Urada, ki je neodvisen pri opravljanju preiskav, vendar upravno del Komisije, deluje.
) Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31
Uredba naj bi nudila podrobno pravno podlago in imela horizontalni značaj, saj
Since 2001, the Commission has made e orts to help the 10 new Member States and the candidate countries adopt the acquis in terms of the protection of the European Communities’ nancial interests. e 10 new Member States, Romania and Bulgaria established national antifraud coordination services (AFCOS) to take responsibility for all of the legislative, administrative and operational aspects of protecting the Communities’ nancial interests, which have proved very useful.
(9) Direktiva (ES) 2004/18 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradnje, blaga in storitev (UL L 134, 30.4.2004) je vzpostavila informacijski sistem, ki omogoča izključitev ponudnikov, ki so bili obsojeni v kazenskem postopku, iz postopkov javnih naročil.(10) Sporočilo predsednika, ge. Wallström, g. Kallasa, ge. Hübner in ge.
March 2004, on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004), put into place an information system that makes it possible to exclude tenderers with criminal convictions from public contracts.(10) Communication to the Commission from the President, Ms Wallström, Mr Kallas, Ms Hübner and Ms Fischer Boel — ‘Proposing the launch of a European transparency initiative’ (SEC(2005)1300).
) Komisija je 18. maja 2006 sprejela spremenjeni predlog Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o nančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti, COM(2006) 213 konč.
(14) Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), together with the Commission’s replies (OJ C 202, 8.8.2005).
(16) Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o izvajanju Uredbe
(11) e Commission adopted on 18 May 2006 an amended proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the nancial regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (COM(2006) 213 nal).(12) Proposals for a regulation amending Regulations (EC) No 1073/1999 and (Euratom) No 1074/1999 relating to the investigations carried out by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (COM(2004) 103 and 104).
) Predlog uredbe o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 1073/1999 in (Euratom) št. 1469/95 (Črna lista), COM(2005) 520.
(16) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Regulation (EC) No 1469/95 (COM(2005) 520).
(17) Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1469/95 z dne 22. junija 1995 o ukrepih, ki jih je treba št. 1074/1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF), COM(2004) 103 in 104.
(17) Council Regulation (EC) No 1469/95 of 22 June 1995 on measures to be taken with regard to certain beneficiaries of operations nanced by the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF (OJ L145, 29.6.1995).
sprejeti v zvezi z nekaterimi upravičenci projektov, nanciranih iz Jamstvenega sklada EKUJS, UL L 145, 29.6.1995.
See also Commission report — ‘Evaluation of the activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)’ (COM(2003) 154 nal).
Glej tudi poročilo Komisije „Ocena dejavnosti Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam OLAF“,COM(2003) 154 konč.
ANNUAL REPORT 2005 FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS FIGHT AGAINST FRAUD harmonised implementation. is harmonisation will continue with the amendment of the regulation applicable in the agricultural sector.
LETNO POROČILO 2005 POROČILO KOMISIJE O ZAŠČITI FINANČNIH INTERESOV SKUPNOSTI BOJ PROTI GOLJUFIJAM pokriva vse sektorje boja proti goljufijam v Skupnosti, ki še niso urejeni s sektorsko zakonodajo.
In order to provide better support for Romania’s and Bulgaria’s accession process, OLAF hasreinforced its activities and operational e ectiveness bydetaching a liaison officer to each of the two countries.
Evropsko sodišče je večkrat potrdilo zakonitost in usklajenost medinstitucionalnega okvira notranjih preiskav, ki se na splošno uporablja za institucije, urade in agencije(22).
In 2004, the European Community and its Member States signed a cooperation agreement (18
Memorandumi o soglasju, ki jih je OLAF sklenil z notranjo revizijsko službo (NRS)(23) leta 2001 in z IDOC leta2004(24) in ki opisujejo njihova področja dejavnosti, so omogočili plodno sodelovanje med temi organi.
) with the Swiss Con- federation on fraud prevention and all other illegal activities detrimental to their nancial interests.
Pogosti stiki med OLAF in IDOC v letu 2005 so omogočiliuskladitev njunih dejavnosti v konkretnih primerih.
e basic rules governing the Advisory Committee for the Coordination of Fraud Prevention were amended by Commission decision (21) so as to adapt them to the changes that had occurred since its establishment in 1994, such as the insertion of Article 280 into the EC Treaty, the establishment of OLAF in 1999, and even the introduction of the euro. e Committee, made up of representatives of the Member States and the Commission, assists the Commission in all matters relating to the protection of the Communities’ nancial interests.
Dogodki v letu 2005. Nekatere mednarodne trgovinske transakcije, opravljene ob kršitvi carinskih predpisov in tudi predpisov o intelektualni lastnini, škodijo gospodarstvu in davčnim interesom držav članic ter vplivajo na carinske prihodke v proračun Evropske unije.
Also in 2004, the Commission proposed the adoption of a regulation concerning mutual administrative assistance (19) that would provide a detailed legal basis and would be horizontal in the sense that it covers all the areas involved in the ght against Community fraud and not yet addressed by sectoral legislation.
Trgovina s Kitajsko je v zadnjih letih povzročila nekaj težav. Cilj sporazuma o sodelovanju, o katerem so se pogajali in ga podpisali leta 2004 in ki je začel veljati leta 2005, je izboljšati medsebojno pomoč na carinskem področju med Skupnostjo in Kitajsko.
In accordance with the mission entrusted to it by the Community legislature in 1999, OLAF continued to perform the task of preventing and combating corruption. e European Court of Justice has confirmed on a number of occasions the legality and coherence of the interinstitutional framework for internal investigations, which applies generally to all the institutions, agencies and organisations (22).
V okviru upravne reforme so bili sprejeti ukrepi za ozaveščanje uradnikov in uslužbencev Komisije o načelih dobrega upravljanja projektov, navzkrižjih interesov in ravnanju v primeru suma hudih kaznivih dejanj, ki bi lahko škodila interesom Skupnosti.
e memoranda of understanding concluded by OLAF in
Prva operacija, ki jo je sprejela nova infrastruktura, je bila operacija „FAKE“ v zvezi s ponarejenimi izdelki iz Kitajske.
Events in 2005.
Operacija je potekala maja 2005 in dala zelo zadovoljive rezultate (glej točko 3.2).
Some international trade transactions carried out in violation of customs rules, including the rules relating to intellectual property, adversely a ect the economy and the scal interests of the Member States and the customs revenues of the EU budget.
Predlog Komisije o spremembi pravnega okvira o preiskavah, ki jih opravlja OLAF, sprejet 24. maja 2006, pokriva predvsem izboljšanje obveščanja institucij in možnost, da se v primeru notranje preiskave končnega poročila ne predloži pristojnim sodnim organom, če kazniva dejanja niso huda, če je nančna škoda majhna in če obstajajo notranji ukrepi, ki omogočajo ustrezno spremljanje s predložitvijo zadevni instituciji, uradu ali agenciji.
Trade with China has given rise to a number of problems in recent years.
Uredbe, ki na področju strukturnih skladov in Kohezijskega sklada določajo obveznost držav članic, da Komisiji sporočijo primere, v katerih obstaja sum nepravilnosti glede na sektorske ureditve, so bile spremenjene in poso-dobljene(20), da bi zagotovili usklajeno izvajanje.
A cooperation agreement negotiated and signed in 2004 entered into force in 2005, with the aim of improving mutual assistance between the European Community and China in the customs eld. e operational side is managed by OLAF.
Usklajevanje se bo nadaljevalo s spremembo uredbe za področje kmetijstva.
2004 with the Internal Audit Service (IAS) (23) and with the IAS Data and Operation Centre (IDOC) (24), describing their respective areas of activity, created the conditions for fruitful cooperation between these bodies. Frequent contacts between OLAF and IDOC in 2005 enabled them to coordinate their activities in specific cases.
Komisija je zaradi težav, povezanih z nezdružljivostjo nacionalnih pravnih sistemov ter obravnavo zapletenih in pogosto nadnacionalnih pravnih zadev, sprejela ta četrti izziv v svojem splošnem strateškem pristopu.
A permanent technical support infrastructure (POCU), with better cooperation and support for joint customs operations by the Member States, was launched at OLAF.
Statut Svetovalnega odbora za usklajevanje boja proti go-lju jam je bil spremenjen z Odločbo Komisije(21), da bi ga prilagodili spremembam, ki so nastale po njegovi ustanovitvi leta 1994, kot so vključitev člena 280 PES v Amsterdamsko pogodbo, ustanovitev OLAF leta 1999 ali tudi uvedba eura.
POCU will allow better cooperation for joint customs operations, enabling them to proceed rapidly at a lower cost. e rst operation based on the new infrastructure was ‘Operation Fake’ concerning counterfeit goods from China. e operation took place in May 2005 and produced very satisfactory results (see point 3.2).
Odbor, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic in Komisije, pomaga Komisiji pri vsakem vprašanju, ki se nanaša na zaščito nančnih interesov Skupnosti.
In the context of the administrative reform, measures were taken to make Commission officials and other servants aware of the principles of sound project management, con- icts of interest and the correct conduct to adopt in cases where there is suspicion of serious wrongdoing likely to be detrimental to the interests of the Communities.
Komisija je leta 2001 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložila predlog direktive o kazenskopravni zaščiti nančnih interesov Skupnosti(25).
e regulations in the eld of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund requiring the Member States to inform the Commission of cases where there is suspicion that anirregularity has been committed under the sectoral regulations were amended and modernised (20) so as to ensure
Cilj tega predloga je v instrumentu Skupnosti povzeti nekaj določb kazenskega prava (zlasti opredelitev nezakonitega ravnanja, odgovornosti in sankcij ter sodelovanje s Komisijo) iz
) Commission decision of 25 February 2005 amending Decision 94/140/EC setting up an advisory committee for the coordination of fraud prevention (OJ L 71, 17.3.2005).
OLAF je v skladu z nalogo, ki mu jo je leta 1999 zaupal zakonodajalec, nadaljeval z opravljanjem nalog preprečevanja
(22) e European Court of Justice, in its decision in Case C-167/02 P, confirmed on 30 March 2004 the judgment of the Court of First Instance in Case T-17/00 of 26 February 2002 declaring the appeal by 71 members of the European Parliament inadmissible. e appeal sought to annul the decision of the Parliament of 18 November 1999 amending its rules of procedure, which authorised the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) to carry out its internal investigations also within the European Parliament.
Ti so s to tožbo zahtevali razveljavitev Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta z dne18. novembra 1999 – o spremembi notranjega pravilnika – ki OLAF dovoljuje opravljanje notranjih preiskav tudi v Evropskem parlamentu.
In 2003, in Cases C-11/00 and C-15/00, the Court ruled that OLAF could investigate cases of suspected fraud and irregularities within the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Investment Bank (EIB) on the grounds that Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 was applicable. e Court also annulled the decisions of the ECB and the EIB aimed at reserving the right for such investigations to be carried out internally.
Sodišče je leta 2003 v zadevah C-11/00 in C-15/00 razsodilo, da OLAF lahko preiskuje v primeru suma goljufije in nepravilnosti v Evropski centralni banki (ECB) in Evropski investicijski banki (EIB), saj je Uredba (ES) št. 1073/1999 veljala. Sodišče je razveljavilo tudi sklepa ECB in EIB, s katerima sta možnost opravljanja takšnih preiskav dali svojih notranjih službam.
(23) OLAF–IAS memorandum of understanding of 25 July 2001 (SEC(2003) 884/2).(24) Commission Decision C (2004) 1588 nal/4 of 28 April 2004.
(23) Memorandum o soglasju OLAF-IAS z dne 25. julija 2001, SEC(2003) 884/2.(24) Sklep Komisije C(2004) 1588 konč./4 z dne 28. aprila 2004.(25) COM(2001) 272 konč., UL C 240E, 28.8.2001, kakor je bil leta 2002 spremenjen na podlagi pripomb Računskega sodišča in Evropskega parlamenta,
ANNUAL REPORT 2005 FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS FIGHT AGAINST FRAUD be adopted late in 2007 and will cover the 25 Member States.
LETNO POROČILO 2005 POROČILO KOMISIJE O ZAŠČITI FINANČNIH INTERESOV SKUPNOSTI BOJ PROTI GOLJUFIJAM
Enhancement of the criminal judicial dimension e Commission included this fourth guideline in its overall strategic approach in order to address the difficulties linked to the incompatibility of the national legal systems and the need to handle complex and o en transnational legal matters.
njenih protokolov( povečalo predvsem na področju boja proti tihotapljenju in ponarejanju eurov. Urad ima tudi stike z mednarodnimi organi, kot sta Interpol ali Svetovna carinska organizacija (WCO).
e memorandum of understanding signed by OLAF and Eurojust in 2003 makes provision for mutual exchanges of information and cooperation with a view to protecting the Communities’ nancial interests. e practical implementing arrangements were adopted by OLAF and Eurojust in 2004.
Navedena konvencija, njen prvi protokol in protokol o pristojnosti Sodišča so začeli veljati leta 2002 in s tem izboljšali pravosodno sodelovanje na različnih področjih.
An OLAF–Eurojust liaison group has been set up to put the memorandum into e ect. e group held regular meetings in 2005.
Komisija Svetu priporoča, naj pozove države članice k večjemu prizadevanju za okrepitev nacionalne kazenske zakonodaje, ponovni preučitvi pridržkov glede instrumentov konvencije in ratifikaciji drugega protokola.