natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
41 — These enjoy a particularly high level of protection and must therefore be strictly distinguished from other particulars which mark a wine.
41 – Te uživajo zlasti visoko za�čito in jih je zato treba strogo razmejiti od drugih navedb, ki označujejo vino. Glej k temu ozko razlago Sodi�ča v sodbi z dne 12. maja 2005 v zadevi Regione autonoma Friuli-Venezia Giulia (C-347/03, ZOdl., str. I-3785, točki 96 in 97).
As has already been explained at the beginning, a comprehensive prohibition on translations applies to geographical designations of origin in the general legislation on wine designations on the basis of the caselaw of the Court of Justice and under the clear wording of Article 13(1) of Regulation No 2081/02: Case C-66/00 Dante Bigi (cited above in footnote 36), Opinion of Advocate General Léger in that case, point 50, Opinion of Advocate General Mazák in Case C-132/05 Commission v Germany (cited above in footnote 36), point 42.
Za geografske označbe porekla velja v splo�nih predpisih o označbah, kot je bilo že na začetku obrazloženo, v skladu s sodno prakso Sodi�ča in glede na jasno besedilo člena 13(1) Uredbe �t. 2081/01 ob�irna prepoved prevajanja: sodba Dante Bigi (navedena v opombi 36 zgoraj); sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca Légerja, predstavljeni 9. oktobra 2001 v tej zadevi, točka 50, sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca Mazáka, predstavljeni 28. junija 2007 v zadevi Komisija proti Zvezni republiki Nemčiji (C-132/05, �e neobjavljena v ZOdl., točka 42).
43 For that reason it is not possible to concur with the argument put forward by the Spanish Government regarding translation.
43Zaradi tega ni mogoče sprejeti trditve �panske vlade v zvezi s prevodi.
However, the use of derived terms (such as ‘Privatreserve’) and translations (such as ‘Réserve’ in French) is not prohibited by the second subparagraph of Article 24(4) of Regulation No 753/2002.
Uporaba izpeljanega izraza (na primer Privatreserve) ter prevodov (na primer Réserve v francoskem jeziku) pa ni prepovedana s členom 24(4), drugi pododstavek, Uredbe �t. 753/2002.
The answer to the second question must therefore be that there is imitation or evocation within the meaning of Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation No 753/2002 if it is in the language of the protected traditional term.
Na drugo vpra�anje za predhodno odločanje je torej treba odgovoriti, da gre za protipravno ponarejanje ali namigovanje v smislu člena 24(2)(a) Uredbe �t. 753/2002 takrat, kadar do njega pride v jeziku, v katerem je za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz.
Whilst it is therefore clear that the Community legislature deliberately decided not to prohibit translations for wines which are not wines in the same category and thus restricted the scope of the protection for the traditional terms to their own language, that cannot apply only to misuse, but must apply equally to all situations under Article 24(2) of Regulation No 753/2002, that is to say also to imitation and evocation.
Zakonodajalec Skupnosti se je zavestno odpovedal prepovedi prevajanja za vina, ki niso vina iste kategorije, in je s tem omejil obseg za�čite tradicionalnih izrazov na njihov jezik, tako da to ne more veljati smo za prilastitev, ampak mora veljati enako za vsa dejanska stanja iz člena 24(2) Uredbe �t. 753/2002, torej tudi za ponarejanje in namigovanje.
Otherwise the deliberate decision not to prohibit translations would be entirely meaningless.
V nasprotnem primeru bi bila zavestna odpoved prepovedi prevajanja popolnoma brez pomena.
D — The third question
D – Tretje vprašanje za predhodno odločanje
That Code du vin has not been in force since 6 September 2003.
Ta Code du vin ne velja več od 6. septembra 2003. Zdi se, da novi francoski predpisi o vinu (Ordonnance no 2006-1547 du 7 décembre 2006 relative à la valorisation des produits agricoles, forestiers ou alimentaires et des produits de la mer) urejajo dopustnost uporabe izrazov „Réserve“ in „Grande réserve“ z generalno klavzulo člena L 644-2 Code rural. V Španiji člen 3(2) zakona 24/2003 (Ley 24/2003, de 10 de julio, de la Viña y del Vino, http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/l24-2003. t1.html) ureja izraza „Reserva“ in „Gran reserva“ in določa zelo natančne predpostavke za metode staranja in procese.
In comparison with the old and the new French legislation, Spanish law provides very precisely for the ageing methods for which the terms ‘Reserva’ and ‘Gran reserva’ may be used.
V primerjavi s starimi in novimi francoskimi predpisi določajo �panski predpisi zelo natančno, pri katerih metodah staranja se lahko uporabi izraz „Reserva“ in „Gran reserva“.
In France it is pointed out that the use of the terms ‘Réserve’ and ‘Grande réserve’ should not create any risk of confusion with designations of origin for wines.
V Franciji se opozarja na to, da uporaba izrazov „Réserve“ in „Grande réserve“ ne sme povzročiti nobene nevarnosti zamenjave z označbami porekla za vina.
With its third question the Bundesverwaltungsgericht is seeking to ascertain whether Article 24(2) of Regulation No 753/2002 is to be interpreted as meaning that the traditional terms listed in Annex III are protected only with regard to wines from the same producer Member State as the protected traditional term.
BVerwG želi s tretjim vpra�anjem izvedeti, ali je treba člen 24(2) Uredbe �t. 753/2002 razlagati tako, da so tradicionalni izrazi, navedeni v Prilogi III, za�čiteni samo glede na vina, ki izvirajo iz iste države članice proizvajalke kot za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz.
SCHNEIDER must apply throughout the Community and thus a fortiori in respect of wines from other Member States, otherwise the protection of traditional terms guaranteed by Community law would be meaningless, which would undermine the full effectiveness of Community law (interpretation according to the effet utile).
SCHNEIDER bi bila za�čita tradicionalnih izrazov, ki jo zagotavlja pravo Skupnosti, brez pomena, kar bi spodkopalo poln učinek prava Skupnosti (razlaga v skladu z effet utile).
The Commission is correct in its view that essentially only wines in the same category (the category ‘quality wine psr’) can be affected, as the traditional term is linked only with them.
Pri tem je treba sicer Komisiji pritrditi, da gre lahko v tej zadevi le za vina iste kategorije (kategorija „kvalitetno vino pdpo“), saj je tradicionalni izraz povezan le s to kategorijo.
44On the other hand, it would be wrong to restrict the question referred to the use of the terms ‘Reserve’ or ‘PrivatReserve’ as the case in the main proceedings also concerns the French terms ‘Réserve’ and ‘Grande Réserve’.
44Omejitev vpra�anja za predhodno odločanje na uporabo izraza „Reserve“ oziroma „Privat-Reserve“ bi bilo nasprotno napačno, saj je �lo v postopku v glavni stvari tudi za francoska izraza „Réserve“ in „Grande Réserve“.
Nor do I see any reason to restrict the question referred solely to use for wines from Germany.
Ravno tako ne vidim nobenega razloga, da bi se vpra�anje za predhodno odločanje omejilo samo na uporabo za vina iz Nemčije.
Essentially the Member States which submitted observations and the Commission are correct in their view that the protection guaranteed under Article 24(2) of the implementing regulation may not be restricted to protection in respect of wines from the State of origin of the designation.
V tej zadevi je treba pritrditi državam članicam intervenientkam in Komisiji, da za�čita, zagotovljena v členu 24(2) izvedbene uredbe, ne more biti omejena na za�čito v razmerju do vin iz države izvora označbe.
Lastly, this is the precise purpose of rules of Community law which seek to define uniform standards of protection throughout the Community.
Ravno v tem je smisel predpisa prava Skupnosti, katerega namen je določitev enotnega standarda za�čite na celotnem ozemlju Skupnosti.
The protection of the term — in its own language — against use in other Member States for the wines produced there is precisely the added value of the rule of Community law compared with purely national protective rules.
V nasprotju z nacionalnimi pravili o za�čiti je dodana vrednost predpisa prava Skupnosti ravno v za�čiti izraza – v lastnem jeziku – pred uporabo v drugih državah članicah za vina, ki so tam proizvedena.
In its observations the Commission rightly points out that the protective of a traditional term under Community law is linked to the fact that the term has an importance which goes beyond the national market. 45
Komisija v svojih stali�čih pravilno opozarja na to, da se za�čita tradicionalnega izraza na ravni prava Skupnosti navezuje na dejstvo, da ima izraz pomen, ki presega nacionalni trg. 45
In order to be effective, the protection
Za�čita mora veljati v vsej Skupnosti, da bi bila učinkovita, in s tem a fortiori za vina iz drugih držav članic, sicer
The answer to the third question must therefore be that traditional terms are protected not only with regard to use for wines from the same producer Member State as the protected traditional term.
Na tretje vpra�anje za predhodno odločanje je zato treba odgovoriti, da tradicionalni izrazi niso za�čiteni samo glede uporabe za vina, ki izvirajo iz iste države članice proizvajalke kot za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz.
The protection extends throughout the European Union.
Za�čita velja za celotno Evropsko unijo.
44 — See also Case C-283/02 Italy v Commission (cited above in footnote 37), paragraph 32 et seq.
44 – Glej tudi sodbo z dne 3. marca 2005 v zadevi Italija proti Komisiji (C-283/02, neobjavljena v ZOdl., točka 32 in naslednje).
2008 — CASE C-285/06
2008 – ZADEVA C-285/06
Advocate General: V. Trstenjak, Registrar: J. Swedenborg, Administrator, having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 13 September 2007, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
Trstenjak, sodni tajnik: J. Swedenborg, administrator, na podlagi pisnega postopka in obravnave z dne 13. septembra 2007, ob upo�tevanju stali�č, ki so jih predložili:
15; ‘Regulation No 753/2002’).
15, v nadaljevanju: Uredba �t. 753/2002).
Regulation No 1493/1999
Uredba št. 1493/1999
Recital 50 in the preamble to Regulation No 1493/1999 is worded as follows:
V uvodni izjavi 50 Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 je določeno:
‘the description, designation and presentation of products covered by this Regulation can have significant effects on their marketability; this Regulation should therefore lay down rules in this connection which take into account the legitimate interests of consumers and producers and promote the smooth operation of the internal market and the production of quality products; the fundamental principles of these rules should provide for the obligatory use of certain terms so as to identify the product and provide consumers with certain important items of information and the optional use of other information on the basis of Community rules or subject to rules concerning the prevention of fraudulent practices’.
„Opis, označevanje in predstavitev proizvodov, ki so zajeti v tej uredbi, pomembno vplivajo na njihovo trženje; ta uredba naj zato s tem v zvezi določi pravila, ki upo�tevajo legitimne interese potro�nikov in proizvajalcev in pospe�ujejo nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga in proizvodnjo kakovostnih proizvodov; temeljna načela teh pravil naj zagotovijo obvezno uporabo nekaterih podatkov, s katerimi se lahko opredeli proizvod in se potro�nikom lahko priskrbijo nekatere pomembne informacije, in optimalno uporabo drugih informacij na podlagi predpisov Skupnosti ali ob upo�tevanju predpisov o preprečevanju goljufij.“
Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation No 1493/1999 states:
Člen 47(1) in (2) te uredbe določa:
(b) the protection of the legitimate interests of producers;
Pri teh pravilih se upo�tevajo zlasti naslednji cilji: a) za�čita legitimnih interesov potro�nikov; b) za�čita legitimnih interesov proizvajalcev; c) nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga; d) pospe�evanje proizvodnje kakovostnih proizvodov.
The rules mentioned in paragraph 1 shall include, in particular, provisions:
Pravila, navedena v odstavku 1, zajemajo zlasti določbe o: a) obvezni uporabi nekaterih podatkov; b) dovoljeni uporabi nekaterih podatkov pod določenimi pogoji;
(c) permitting the use of other terms, including information which may be useful for consumers;
2008 – ZADEVA C-285/06 c) dovoljeni uporabi drugih podatkov, vključno z informacijami, ki so lahko koristne za potro�nike; d) za�čiti in nadzoru nekaterih podatkov; e) uporabi geografskih označb in tradicionalnih poimenovanj;
Article 48 of Regulation No 1493/1999 provides:
Člen 48 omenjene uredbe določa:
This shall apply even if the information is used in translation or with a reference to the actual provenance or with additions such as “kind”, “type”, “style”, “imitation”, “brand” or the like;
To velja tudi, če se informacije uporabljajo v prevodu ali v zvezi z dejanskim izvorom ali z dodatki, kakor so ‚vrsta‘, ‚tip‘, ‚slog‘, ‚imitacija‘, ‚znamka‘ ali podobno,
Under the heading ‘Optional particulars’, point B of Annex VII of Regulation No 1493/1999 states:
V točki B priloge VII k isti uredbi, z naslovom „Neobvezne navedbe“, je določeno:
(b) in the case of table wines with geographical indication and quality wines psr [produced in specified regions]:
[…] b) za namizna vina z geografsko označbo in kakovostna vina pdpo [pridelana na določenem pridelovalnem področju]:
Regulation No 753/2002
Uredba št. 753/2002
According to recitals 4 and 18 in the preamble to Regulation No 753/2002:
V uvodnih izjavah 4 in 18 Uredbe �t. 753/2002 je določeno:
‘This Regulation should comply with the objectives of protecting the legitimate interests of consumers and producers, ensuring the smooth operation of the internal market and promoting the production of quality products as laid down in Article 47(1) of Regulation … No 1493/1999. …
„Ta uredba bi morala biti usklajena s cilji, povezanimi z za�čito legitimnih interesov potro�nikov in proizvajalcev, zagotavljanjem nemotenega delovanja notranjega trga in pospe�evanjem proizvodnje kakovostnih proizvodov, določenih v členu 47(1) Uredbe […] �t. 1493/1999. […]
The use and regulation of certain terms (other than designations of origin) to describe quality wine sector products is a long-established practice in the Community.
Pri uporabi določenih izrazov (razen označb porekla) za opis kakovostnih proizvodov vinskega sektorja in zadevnih predpisov gre za priznano običajno prakso v Skupnosti.
Such traditional expressions can evoke in the minds of consumers a production or ageing method or a quality, colour or type of wine or a particular event linked to the history of the wine.
Take tradicionalne izraze lahko potro�niki povezujejo z določenim postopkom proizvodnje [ali staranja] ali kakovostjo, barvo ali tipom vina ali posebnim dogodkom v zvezi z zgodovino vina.
So as to ensure fair competition and avoid misleading consumers, a common framework should be laid down for registering and protecting such traditional expressions.’
Da bi zagotovili po�teno konkurenco in se izognili zavajanju potro�nikov, bi bilo treba določiti skupni okvir za registracijo in za�čito teh tradicionalnih izrazov.“
Article 6 of Regulation No 753/2002, entitled ‘Rules common to all particulars on labelling’, states:
Člen 6 te uredbe, z naslovom „Skupni predpisi za vse navedbe na nalepki“, določa:
For the purposes of Annex VII(B)(3) to Regulation … No 1493/1999, the labelling of the products covered by that Annex may be supplemented by other particulars provided that there is no risk that such particulars might mislead those to whom they are addressed, particularly by creating confusion with the compulsory particulars referred to in paragraph A(1) or the optional particulars referred to in paragraph B(1) of that Annex.
Za namene Priloge VII(B)(3) k Uredbi […] �t. 1493/1999 se lahko označevanje proizvodov, urejenih v navedeni prilogi, dopolni tudi z drugimi navedbami, če ni tveganja, da bi lahko te navedbe zavajale osebe zlasti z možnostjo zamenjave z obveznimi navedbami iz odstavka A(l) ali z neobveznimi navedbami iz odstavka B(l) navedene priloge.
In the case of the products referred to in Annex VII(B)(3) to Regulation … No 1493/1999, an authority designated under Article 72(1) thereof may, provided that it acts in compliance with the general procedural rules adopted by the Member State, require bottlers, consignors or importers to provide proof of the accuracy of the wording used for the description as it relates to the nature, identity, quality, composition, origin or source of the product concerned or the products used to make it.
Pri proizvodih iz Priloge VII(B)(3) k Uredbi […] �t. 1493/1999 lahko zahteva organ iz člena 72(1) navedene uredbe, ob upo�tevanju splo�nih postopkovnih pravil države članice, od polnilcev, po�iljateljev ali uvoznikov dokazilo o točnosti navedb, uporabljenih za opise, ki se nana�ajo na vrsto, istovetnost, kakovost, sestavo, poreklo ali vir zadevnega proizvoda ali proizvodov, uporabljenih pri njegovi proizvodnji.
Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002, entitled ‘Definition of “other traditional terms”’, is worded as follows:
Člen 23 omenjene uredbe, z naslovom „Opredelitev pojma dodatni tradicionalni izrazi“, določa:
‘For the purposes of the fifth indent of point B(1)(b) of Annex VII to Regulation … 1493/1999, “other traditional terms” means additional terms traditionally used in producer Member States to designate, in the case of wines referred to in this Title,
„Za namene pete alinee Priloge VII(B)(l)(b) k Uredbi �t. 1493/1999 pojem ‚dodatni tradicionalni izrazi‘ pomeni dodatne izraze, ki se običajno uporabljajo v državah članicah proizvajalkah pri vinih iz tega naslova in se nana�ajo na postopek
2008 — CASE C-285/06 the production or ageing method or the quality, colour, type of place, or a particular event linked to the history of the wine concerned and defined in a Member State’s legislation for the purposes of designating the wines concerned originating in its territory.’
2008 – ZADEVA C-285/06 proizvodnje, priprave ali staranja oziroma kakovost, barvo ali vrsto vina ali na kraj ali posebni dogodek, povezan z zgodovino vina, in so opredeljeni v zakonodajah držav članic o poimenovanju kakovostnih vin pdpo s poreklom na njihovem ozemlju.“
Article 24 of Regulation No 753/2002, entitled ‘Protection of traditional terms’, states:
Člen 24 iste uredbe, z naslovom „Za�čita tradicionalnih izrazov“, določa:
For the purposes of this Article, “traditional terms” means the additional traditional terms referred to in Article 23, the terms referred to in Article 28 and the traditional specific terms referred to in Article 14(1), first subparagraph, point (c), Article 29 and Article 38(3).
Za namene tega člena ‚tradicionalni izrazi‘ pomenijo dodatne tradicionalne izraze iz člena 23, izraze iz člena 28 in posebne tradicionalne izraze iz točke (c) prvega pododstavka člena 14(1), člena 29 in člena 38(3).
(a) all misuse, imitation or evocation, even if the protected term is accompanied by an expression such as “kind”, “type”, “style”, “imitation”, “brand” or similar;
Tradicionalni izrazi, navedeni v Prilogi III, so pridržani za vina, s katerimi so povezani, in se za�čitijo pred: a) vsako protipravno prilastitvijo, ponarejanjem ali namigovanjem na povezanost z njimi, tudi če se za�čiteni izraz uporablja z izrazi, kakor so ‚vrsta‘, ‚tip‘, ‚slog‘, ‚ponaredek‘, ‚znamka‘ ali podobno; b) kakr�no koli drugo nepoobla�čeno, napačno ali zavajajočo navedbo glede lastnosti ali bistvenih kakovosti vina na notranji ali zunanji strani embalaže, ogla�evalskem materialu ali kakr�nem koli drugem dokumentu, ki se nana�a na vino;
(c) any other practice liable to mislead the public, in particular to give the impression that the wine qualifies for the protected traditional term.
SCHNEIDER c) kakr�nim koli drugim ravnanjem, ki bi lahko zavedlo javnost, zlasti glede ustvarjanja vtisa, da vino izpolnjuje pogoje za poimenovanje z za�čitenim tradicionalnim izrazom.
Each traditional term listed in Annex III shall be linked to one or more categories of wine. These categories are:
Vsak tradicionalni izraz, naveden v Prilogi III, je povezan z eno ali več kategorijami vina.
(a) quality liqueur wines psr and liqueur wines with a geographical indication; in this case the protection of a traditional term shall apply only to the designation of liqueur wines;
Te kategorije so: a) kakovostna likerska vina pdpo in likerska vina z geografsko označbo; v tem primeru velja za�čita tradicionalnega izraza samo za poimenovanje likerskih vin;
(c) quality semisparkling wines psr and semisparkling wines with a geographical indication; in this case the protection of a traditional term shall apply only to the designation of semisparkling wines and aerated semisparkling wines;
2008 – ZADEVA C-285/06 b) kakovostna peneča vina pdpo (vključno s kakovostnimi penečimi vini pdpo aromatičnega tipa); v tem primeru velja za�čita tradicionalnega izraza samo za poimenovanje penečih vin in gaziranih penečih vin; c) kakovostna vina biser pdpo in vina biser z geografsko označbo; v tem primeru velja za�čita tradicionalnega izraza samo za poimenovanje vin biser in gaziranih vin biser; d) kakovostna vina pdpo, razen tistih iz točk (a), (b) ali (c), in namizna vina z geografsko označbo; v tem primeru velja za�čita tradicionalnega izraza samo za poimenovanje nelikerskih vin, penečih vin, gaziranih penečih vin, vin biser in gaziranih vin biser; e) delno prevreti grozdni mo�t z geografsko označbo, namenjen neposredni prehrani ljudi; v tem primeru velja za�čita tradicionalnega izraza samo za poimenovanje delno prevretega grozdnega mo�ta; f) vino iz prezrelega grozdja z geografsko označbo; v tem primeru velja za�čita tradicionalnega izraza samo za poimenovanje vina iz prezrelega grozdja.
(b) be sufficiently distinctive and/or enjoy an established reputation on the Community market;
Za vnos v Prilogo III(A) mora biti tradicionalni izraz: a) sam po sebi specifičen in natančno opredeljen v zakonodaji države članice; b) dovolj svojstven in/ali uveljavljen na trgu Skupnosti; c) v tradicionalni uporabi vsaj deset let v zadevni državi članici; d) v uporabi za eno ali več vin ali kategorij vin v Skupnosti.
(a) the facts justifying recognition of each term;
Države članice Komisiji sporočijo: a) obrazložitev za priznanje tradicionalnega izraza;
(b) the traditional terms included in their legislation that meet the above requirements and the wines for which they are reserved;
2008 – ZADEVA C-285/06 b) tradicionalne izraze, dovoljene z njihovo zakonodajo, ki izpolnjujejo zgoraj navedene pogoje, in vina, za katera so pridržani; c) kakr�ne koli tradicionalne izraze, ki v državi porekla niso več za�čiteni.
That annex includes, in particular:
V tej prilogi so navedeni zlasti:
— for Italy, in Italian, the additional traditional term ‘Riserva’,
– za Italijo v italijanskem jeziku dodatni tradicionalni izraz „Riserva“;
— for Austria, in German, the additional traditional term ‘Reserve’, and
– za Avstrijo v nem�kem jeziku dodatni tradicionalni izraz „Reserve“, in
In a letter dated 21 May 2003 the Aufsichts- und Dienstleistungsdirektion stated that the term ‘PrivatReserve’ could not be accepted either.
Schneider navedel, da je pripravljen omenjeni označbi zamenjati z označbama „Reserve“ ali „Privat-Reserve“ v nem�kem jeziku, v dopisu z dne 21. maja 2003 pa je navedla, da tudi označba „Privat-Reserve“ ni sprejemljiva.
The questions referred
Vprašanja za predhodno odločanje
Article 47(2)(a) to (c) of Regulation No 1493/1999 provides that rules relating to the description, designation and presentation of certain products covered by that regulation, and the protection of certain particulars and terms are to include, in particular, provisions making the use of certain terms compulsory (compulsory particulars) and provisions permitting the use of certain terms, subject to conditions, and the use of other terms, including information which may be useful for consumers (optional particulars).
Člen 47(2), od (a) do (c), Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 določa, da pravila o poimenovanju, označevanju in predstavitvi nekaterih proizvodov iz te uredbe ter o za�čiti nekaterih podatkov in pojmov zajemajo zlasti določbe o obvezni uporabi nekaterih podatkov (obvezne navedbe) ter določbe o dovoljeni uporabi nekaterih podatkov pod določenimi pogoji in dovoljeni uporabi drugih podatkov, vključno z informacijami, ki so lahko koristne za potro�nike (neobvezne navedbe).