natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As OHIM correctly stated in the contested decision, the relevant public, in the field covered by the trade mark application, understand the word sign EUROHYPO as referring, as a whole and in general, to financial services requiring real securities and, in particular, to mortgage loans paid in the currency of the European Economic and Monetary Union.
Kot pa je UUNT v sporni odločbi pravilno poudaril, upo�tevna javnost na področju, na katero se nana�a prijava znamke, razume besedni znak „EUROHYPO“ kot znak, ki se v celoti in na splo�no nana�a na finančne storitve, za katere so potrebna stvarna jamstva, in zlasti na hipotekarna posojila, ki so izplačana v valuti Evropske ekonomske in monetarne unije.
Furthermore, there is no additional element which would allow the view to be reached that the combination, created by the current and usual components EURO and HYPO, is unusual or might have its own meaning which, in the perception of the relevant public, distinguishes the services offered by the appellant from those of a different commercial origin.
Poleg tega noben dodaten element ne omogoča presoje, da bi bila kombinacija pogostih in običajnih delov „euro“ in „hypo“ neobičajna ali da bi imela lasten pomen, na podlagi katerega bi se v zaznavi zadevne javnosti razlikovale storitve pritožnice od storitev, ki imajo drug tržni izvor.
Therefore, the relevant public perceives the trade mark in question as providing details of the type of services which it designates and not as indicating the origin of those services.
Zato upo�tevna javnost zaznava zadevno znamko kot znamko, ki daje informacije o vrsti storitev, ki jih označuje, in ne kot znamko, ki bi označevala izvor zadevnih storitev.
It follows that the trade mark for which registration is sought does not have a distinctive character for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94.
Iz tega sledi, da prijavljena znamka nima razlikovalnega učinka v smislu člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe �t. 40/94.
In those circumstances, the appellant’s action against the contested decision must be dismissed.
Zato je treba tožbo pritožnice zoper sporno odločbo zavrniti.
Under Article 122 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, where the appeal is well founded and the Court itself gives final judgment in the case, the Court shall make a decision as to costs.
Člen 122 Poslovnika določa, da če pritožba ni utemeljena in če Sodi�če samo dokončno odloči v sporu, odloči tudi o stro�kih.
Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, applicable in the procedure on appeal pursuant to Article 118 of those rules, the unsuccessful party shall be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings.
Na podlagi člena 69(2) tega poslovnika, ki se uporablja za pritožbeni postopek na podlagi njegovega člena 118, se neuspeli stranki naloži plačilo stro�kov, če so bili ti prigla�eni.
As OHIM has applied for costs against the appellant and the latter has been unsuccessful, the appellant should be ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings at both instances.
UUNT je predlagal, naj se pritožnici naloži plačilo stro�kov, in ker ta s svojimi pritožbenimi razlogi ni uspela, se ji naloži plačilo stro�kov obeh stopenj.
Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 3 May 2006 in Case T-439/04 Eurohypo v OHIM
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti z dne 3. maja 2006 v zadevi Eurohypo proti UUNT (EUROHYPO) (T-439/04) se razveljavi v
(EUROHYPO), inasmuch as the Court of First Instance of the European Communities held that the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) did not infringe Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 3288/94 of 22 December 1994, by refusing, in its decision of 6 August 2004 (Case R 829/2002-4), to register the term EUROHYPO as a Community trade mark for services in Class 36 of the Nice Agreement of 15 June 1957 concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks, as revised and amended, corresponding to the following description: ‘financial affairs; monetary affairs; real estate affairs; provision of financial services; financing …’;
2008 – ZADEVA C-304/06 P delu, v katerem je Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti presodilo, da četrti odbor za pritožbe Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) (UUNT), s tem ko je z odločbo z dne 6. avgusta 2004 (zadeva R 829/2002-4) zavrnil registracijo izraza „EUROHYPO“ kot znamko Skupnosti za storitve iz razreda 36 v smislu Nicejskega aranžmaja o mednarodni klasifikaciji blaga in storitev zaradi registracije znamk z dne 15. junija 1957, v revidirani in spremenjeni obliki, to je razreda, ki ustreza temu opisu: „[f]inančni posli; denarni posli; posli v zvezi s posredovanjem nepremičnin, finančne storitve, financiranje […]“, ni kršil člena 7(1)(b) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 40/94 z dne 20. decembra 1993 o znamki Skupnosti, kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 3288/94 z dne 22. decembra 1994.
Dismisses the action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 August 2004 (Case R 829/2002-4);
Tožba zoper odločbo z dne 6. avgusta 2004 četrtega odbora za pritožbe Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) (UUNT) se zavrne.
Orders Eurohypo AG to pay the costs of the proceedings at both instances.
Pritožnici se naloži plačilo stroškov obeh stopenj.
Case C-491/06
Zadeva C-491/06
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret)
(Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Vestre Landsret)
(Directive 91/628/EEC — Protection of animals during transport — Implementation — Margin of discretion — Domestic animals of the porcine species — Journeys exceeding eight hours — Minimum height of each deck of the vehicle — Loading density)
„Direktiva 91/628/EGS – Za�čita živali med prevozom – Prenos – Diskrecijska pravica – Domači pra�iči – Vožnje, dalj�e od osmih ur – Minimalna vi�ina vsake plo�čadi vozila – Gostota nakladanja“
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 8 May 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sodba Sodi�ča (tretji senat) z dne 8. maja 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agriculture — Approximation of laws — Protection of animals during transport (Art. 249 EC; Council Directive 91/628, as amended by Directive 95/29)
Kmetijstvo – Približevanje zakonodaj – Zaščita živali med prevozom (člen 249 ES; Direktiva Sveta 91/628, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29)
SUMMARY — CASE C-491/06
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-491/06
Agriculture — Approximation of laws — Protection of animals during transport
Kmetijstvo – Približevanje zakonodaj – Zaščita živali med prevozom
(Council Directive 91/628, as amended by Directive 95/29, Chapter VI of the Annex, section D, point 47)
(poglavje VI, točka 47, naslov D, priloge k Direktivi Sveta 91/628, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29)
Section D of point 47 in Chapter VI of the Annex to Directive 91/628 on the protection of animals during transport, as amended by Directive 95/29, must be interpreted as meaning that a Member State is entitled to introduce national rules under which, in the case of transport operations of over eight hours’ duration, the available space per animal must be at least 0.50 m2per 100 kg of pig.
Poglavje VI, točka 47, naslov D, priloge k Direktivi 91/628 o za�čiti živali med prevozom, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29, je treba razlagati tako, da je država članica upravičena do tega, da bi uvedla nacionalno ureditev, v skladu s katero mora v primeru prevoza, ki traja več kot osem ur, razpoložljiva povr�ina zna�ati vsaj 0,50 m2 na 100 kg težkega pra�iča.
National rules comprising figures for the animal compartment height in order that transporters may refer to more precise standards than those set out in Directive 91/628 on the protection of animals during transport, as amended by Directive 95/29, may fall within the margin of discretion conferred on the Member States by Article 249 EC, on condition that those rules, which comply with the objective pursued by that directive of protecting animals during transport, do not, contrary to the principle of proportionality, prevent attainment of the objectives, also pursued by that directive, of eliminating technical barriers to trade in live animals and allowing market organisations to operate smoothly.
Nacionalna ureditev, ki vsebuje �tevilčne podatke glede vi�ine ograd za živali, zato da bi bile prevoznikom na voljo natančnej�e določbe od določb iz Direktive 91/628 o za�čiti živali med prevozom, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 95/29, spada pod diskrecijsko pravico, ki jo državam članicam daje člen 249 ES, pod pogojem, da ta ureditev, s katero se spo�tuje cilj za�čite živali med prevozom, ki ga zasleduje ta direktiva, ne preprečuje uresničitve ciljev odprave tehničnih ovir pri trgovanju z živimi živalmi in nemotenega delovanja tržnih ureditev, ki ju prav tako zasleduje navedena direktiva, s čimer bi bilo kr�eno načelo sorazmernosti.
It is for the national court to establish whether those rules comply with those principles.
Predložitveno sodi�če mora preveriti, ali se s to ureditvijo spo�tujejo ta načela.
It is apparent from the wording of that provision that the Community legislature expressly laid down minimum standards for loading density for pigs of around 100 kg and, in particular, allowed the Member States to increase those standards by up to 20% depending on meteorological conditions and journey time.
Iz besedila navedene določbe namreč izhaja, da je zakonodajalec Skupnosti izrecno določil minimalne zahteve glede gostote nakladanja 100 kg težkih pra�ičev, pri čemer je državam članicam zlasti dovolil, da glede na vremenske pogoje in čas na poti te zahteve povečajo za največ 20 %.
(see para. 46, operative part 1)
(Glej točko 46 in točko 1 izreka.)
(see paras 49, 51, operative part 2)
(Glej točki 49, 51 in točko 2 izreka.)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)8 May 2008 *
SODBA SODIŠČA (tretji senat) z dne 8. maja 2008 *
REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark), made by decision of 23 November 2006, received at the Court on 28 November 2006, in the proceedings
V zadevi C-491/06, katere predmet je predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe na podlagi člena 234 ES, ki ga je vložilo Vestre Landsret (Danska) z odločbo z dne 23. novembra 2006, ki je prispela na Sodi�če 28. novembra 2006, v postopku
2008 — CASE C-491/06
2008 – ZADEVA C-491/06 generalni pravobranilec: Y.
Advocate General: Y. Bot, Registrar: C. Strömholm, Administrator, having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 28 November 2007, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
Bot, sodna tajnica: C. Strömholm, administratorka, na podlagi pisnega postopka in obravnave z dne 28. novembra 2007, ob upo�tevanju stali�č, ki so jih predložili:
DANSKE SVINEPRODUCENTER gives the following
DANSKE SVINEPRODUCENTER izreka naslednjo
The reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of point 2(b) of Title A of Chapter I, section D of point 47 in Chapter VI, and the third indent of point 48(3) in Chapter VII of the annex to Council Directive 91/628/EEC of 19 November 1991 on the protection of animals during transport and amending Directives 90/425/EEC and 91/496/EEC (OJ 1991 L 340, p.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na razlago poglavja I, naslov A, točka 2(b), poglavja VI, točka 47, naslov D, in poglavja VII, točka 48(3), tretja alinea, priloge k Direktivi Sveta 91/628/EGS z dne 19. novembra 1991 o za�čiti živali med prevozom in o spremembi direktiv 90/425/EGS in 91/496/EGS (UL L 340, str.
17), as amended by Council Directive 95/29/EC of 29 June 1995 (OJ 1995 L 148, p.
17), kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 95/29/ES z dne 29. junija 1995 (UL L 148, str.
52) (‘Directive 91/628’).
52, v nadaljevanju: Direktiva 91/628).
The reference has been made in the course of proceedings between the professional body Danske Svineproducenter and the Justitsministeriet (Ministry of Justice) concerning the implementation of Directive 91/628 in Danish law.
Ta predlog je bil vložen v okviru spora med poklicnim združenjem Danske Svineproducenter in Justitsministeriet (ministrstvo za pravosodje) glede prenosa Direktive 91/628 v dansko pravo.
The third and fourth recitals in the preamble to Directive 95/29 read as follows:
Tretja in četrta uvodna izjava Direktive 95/29 se glasita:
‘… some Member States have rules on journey times, feeding and watering intervals, resting periods and space allowances; … these rules are, in some cases, extremely
„ker imajo nekatere države članice določbe glede časa na poti, presledkov za krmljenje in napajanje, časa počitkov in zahtevanega prostora; ker so ta pravila v nekaterih
2008 — CASE C-491/06 detailed and are used by some Member States to restrict intraCommunity trade in live animals; … persons involved in the transport of animals need clearly defined criteria to enable them to operate on a Community-wide basis without coming into conflict with differing national provisions;
2008 – ZADEVA C-491/06 primerih zelo podrobna in jih nekatere države članice uporabljajo za omejevanje trgovine z živimi živalmi znotraj Skupnosti; ker osebe, ki se ukvarjajo s prevozom živali, potrebujejo jasno opredeljena merila, ki jim omogočajo delovanje v celotni Skupnosti, ne da bi kr�ili odstopajoče nacionalne določbe; ker je za odpravo tehničnih ovir pri trgovini z živimi živalmi in za omogočanje neoviranega delovanja zadevnih tržnih ureditev, ob hkratnem zagotavljanju zadovoljive ravni varovanja zadevnih živali, v okviru notranjega trga treba spremeniti predpise Direktive 91/628/EGS z namenom uskladitve potovalnega časa in časa počitkov, presledkov za krmljenje in napajanje in zahtevanega prostora za nekatere vrste živali“.
By virtue of Article 1(1)(a) thereof, Directive 91/628 applies to domestic animals of the porcine species.
Direktiva 91/628 se na podlagi člena 1(1)(a) uporablja za domače pra�iče.
Article 3(1)(aa) of Directive 91/628 provides that Member States are to ensure that ‘space allowances (loading densities) for animals at least comply with the figures laid down in Chapter VI of the Annex, in respect of the animals and the means of transport referred to in that Chapter’ and that ‘travelling times and rest periods and feeding and watering intervals for certain types of animals comply with those laid down in Chapter VII of the Annex, in respect of the animals referred to in that Chapter, without prejudice to the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85’.
Člen 3(1)(aa) te direktive določa, da države članice zagotovijo, da se mora „zahtevan prostor (gostota nakladanja) za živali […] skladati najmanj s �tevilkami iz poglavja VI Priloge glede na vrsto živali in prevozna sredstva iz tega poglavja“ in da so „potovalni čas in čas počitkov ter presledki za krmljenje in napajanje za nekatere vrste živali […] v skladu s tistimi, določenimi v poglavju VII Priloge glede na vrsto živali iz tega poglavja, brez poseganja v določbe Uredbe (EGS) �t. 3820/85 […]“
Pursuant to Article 5(A)(1)(c) of Directive 91/628, Member States are to ensure that any transporter uses, for the transport of animals referred to in that directive, means
V skladu s členom 5(A), točka (1)(c), Direktive 91/628 države članice zagotovijo, da vsak prevoznik za prevoz živali iz te direktive uporablja prevozna sredstva,
DANSKE SVINEPRODUCENTER of transport that will ensure compliance with Community requirements concerning welfare during transport, and in particular the requirements laid down in the annex to that directive and those to be laid down in accordance with Article 13(1) thereof.
DANSKE SVINEPRODUCENTER ki zagotavljajo skladnost z zahtevami Skupnosti v zvezi z dobrim počutjem med prevozom in zlasti z zahtevami, določenimi v prilogi k navedeni direktivi, in tistimi, ki se določijo v skladu s členom 13(1) te direktive.
Chapter I of the annex to Directive 91/628 contains provisions applicable to the transport of, inter alia, domestic animals of the porcine species.
Poglavje I priloge k Direktivi 91/628 vsebuje določbe, ki se uporabljajo zlasti za prevoz domačih pra�ičev.
Point 2(a) to (c) of Title A of that chapter provides:
Naslov A, točka 2, od (a) do (c), tega poglavja določa:
‘(a) Animals shall be provided with adequate space to stand in their natural position and, when necessary, partitions to protect the animals from motion of the means of transport.
„a) Živali imajo na voljo dovolj prostora, da lahko stojijo v naravnem položaju, in po potrebi pregrade, ki �čitijo živali pred sunki prevoznega sredstva.
Unless special conditions for the protection of animals require otherwise, room to lie down shall be provided.
Razen če posebni pogoji za za�čito živali zahtevajo drugače, imajo živali na voljo dovolj prostora, da ležejo.
(b) The means of transport and containers shall be constructed and operated so as to protect animals against inclement weather and marked differences in climatic conditions.
b) Prevozna sredstva in zabojniki so zgrajeni in upravljani tako, da za�čitijo živali pred slabim vremenom in večjimi razlikami v vremenskih pogojih.
Ventilation and air space shall be in keeping with the conditions of transport and appropriate for the species of animals carried.
Prezračevanje in prostornina ustrezata pogojem prevoza ter vrsti živali, ki jih prevažajo.
Sufficient space should be provided inside the animals’ compartment [“the compartment”] and at each of its levels to ensure that there is adequate ventilation above the animals when they are in a naturally standing position without on any account hindering their natural movement.
Znotraj ograd in na vsaki plo�čadi mora biti živalim zagotovljena dovolj velika talna povr�ina in vi�ina, ki zagotavlja primerno kroženje zraka, ko stojijo v naravnem položaju, ne da bi kar koli oviralo njihovo naravno gibanje.
(c) Means of transport and containers shall be easy to clean, escape-proof and shall be so constructed and operated as to avoid injury and unnecessary suffering to
c) Prevozna sredstva in zabojniki so tak�ni, da se jih zlahka čisti, da iz njih ni mogoče pobegniti, in so zgrajena in upravljana tako, da se živali ne po�kodujejo
2008 — CASE C-491/06 animals and to ensure their safety during transport. … They shall allow for the inspection and care of the animals and shall be stowed in a way which does not interfere with ventilation. …’
2008 – ZADEVA C-491/06 in da jim je prihranjeno nepotrebno trpljenje, ter zagotavljajo varnost živali med prevozom. […] Vozila dopu�čajo pregledovanje in oskrbovanje živali ter so natovorjena tako, da prezračevanje ni onemogočeno. […]“
Section D of point 47 in Chapter VI of the annex to Directive 91/628 provides that, for the transport of pigs by rail and by road, ‘[a]ll pigs must at least be able to lie down and stand up in their natural position’ and that, ‘[i]n order to comply with these minimum requirements, the loading density for pigs of around 100 kg should not exceed 235 kg/m2’.
Poglavje VI, točka 47, naslov D, priloge k Direktivi 91/628 določa, da je pri prevozu po železnici in po cesti „[v]sem pra�ičem […] treba zagotoviti najmanj toliko prostora, da se lahko uležejo in stojijo v naravnem položaju“, in da „[z]aradi skladnosti s temi minimalnimi zahtevami gostota nakladanja za pra�iče, težke približno 100 kg, ne sme biti večja od 235 kg/m2“.
Furthermore, ‘[t]he breed, size and physical condition of the pigs may mean that the minimum required surface area given … has to be increased; a maximum increase of 20% may also be required depending on the meteorological conditions and the journey time’.
Poleg tega se lahko „[t]ako zahtevana minimalna povr�ina […] poveča glede na pasmo, velikost in fizično kondicijo pra�ičev; glede na vremenske pogoje in čas na poti je lahko potrebno povečanje za največ 20 %“.
Pursuant to point 48(2) and (3) in Chapter VII of the annex to Directive 91/628:
Točka 48(2) in (3) poglavja VII priloge k Direktivi 91/628 določa:
Journey times for animals belonging to the species referred to in [paragraph] 1 shall not exceed eight hours.
Čas na poti za živali, ki sodijo med vrste iz [odstavka] 1, ne sme presegati osem ur.
The maximum journey time in [paragraph] 2 may be extended where the transporting vehicle meets the following additional requirements:
Maksimalen čas na poti iz [odstavka] 2 se lahko podalj�a, kadar prevozno sredstvo izpolnjuje naslednje dodatne zahteve:
— there is direct access to the animals,
– do živali je mogoč neposreden dostop,
— adequate ventilation is possible which may be adjusted depending on the temperature (inside and outside),
– na voljo je ustrezno zračenje, ki ga je mogoče ustrezno prilagoditi temperaturi (znotraj in zunaj),
Regulation (EC) No 411/98
Uredba (ES) �t. 411/98
Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 411/98 of 16 February 1998 on additional animal protection standards applicable to road vehicles used for the carriage of livestock on journeys exceeding eight hours (OJ 1998 L 52, p.
Člen 1 Uredbe Sveta (ES) �t. 411/98 z dne 16. februarja 1998 o dodatnih standardih za za�čito živali, ki se uporabljajo za cestna vozila za prevoz rejnih živali na vožnjah, dalj�ih od osem ur (UL L 52, str.
8) provides:
8), določa:
‘Where the journey time of eight hours laid down in Chapter VII(2) of the Annex to Directive 91/628/EEC is exceeded, road vehicles used for the transportation of domestic solipeds and animals of the bovine, ovine, caprine and porcine species
„Kjer čas prevoza prekorači osem ur, določenih v poglavju VII(2) Priloge k Direktivi 91/628/EGS, morajo biti cestna vozila za prevoz znotraj Skupnosti domačih kopi-
2008 — CASE C-491/06 within the Community must comply with the additional requirements set out in the Annex to this Regulation.’
2008 – ZADEVA C-491/06 tarjev ter domačih živali, kot so govedo, ovce, koze in pra�iči, v skladu z dodatnimi zahtevami, določenimi v Prilogi k tej uredbi.“
Point 3 of the annex to Regulation No 411/98 provides:
Točka 3 priloge k Uredbi �t. 411/98 določa:
‘Access
„Dostop
Vehicles used for transport must be equipped so that at all times there can be direct access to all the animals being transported so that they can be inspected and given all appropriate care, including feeding and watering in particular.’
Vozila za prevoz morajo biti opremljena tako, da je vedno omogočen neposreden dostop do vseh živali, ki se prevažajo, da se jih lahko pregleda in primerno oskrbi, vključno predvsem s krmljenjem in napajanjem.“
Directive 91/628 was transposed in Danish law by Decree No 201 of 16 April 1993 on the protection of animals during transport.
Direktiva 91/628 je bila v dansko pravo prenesena z odlokom �t. 201 z dne 16. aprila 1993 o za�čiti živali med prevozom.
Under Paragraph 2(1) thereof, Decree No 734 entered into force on 15 August 2005, with the exception of the provisions relating to loading density, which entered into force on 15 August 2006, in accordance with Paragraph 2(2) of that decree.
Odlok �t. 734 je na podlagi člena 2(1) začel veljati 15. avgusta 2005, razen določb v zvezi z gostoto nakladanja, ki so v skladu s členom 2(2) tega odloka začele veljati 15. avgusta 2006.
The provisions of Decree No 734 relating to compartment height
Določbe odloka �t. 734 v zvezi z vi�ino ograd
Paragraph 6a of Decree No 734 provides:
Člen 6a odloka �t. 734 določa:
In the case of the transport of pigs weighing 40 kg or over, the internal height between each deck — measured from the highest point on the floor to the lowest point on the roof (e.g. the underside of any crossbeams or struts) — shall at least satisfy the following requirements during transport:
Pri prevozu pra�ičev, težjih od 40 kg, mora svetla vi�ina med vsako plo�čadjo, merjeno od najvi�je točke tal do najnižje točke stropa (na primer spodnji del preklade ali podpornika), izpolnjevati naslednje minimalne zahteve:
Average weight in kg
Povprečna teža v kg
Internal height where mechanical ventilation system is used
Svetla vi�ina pri uporabi drugega sistema prezračevanja
Internal height where another ventilation system is used
Svetla vi�ina pri uporabi sistema mehanskega prezračevanja