natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Case C-275/06: Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de España SAU (Information society — Obligations of providers of services — Retention and disclosure of certain traffic data — Obligation of disclosure — Limits — Protection of the confidentiality of electronic communications — Compatibility with the protection of copyright and related rights — Right to effective protection of intellectual property) (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 5 de Madrid) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Zadeva C-275/06: Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) proti Telefónica de España SAU („Informacijska družba – Obveznosti ponudnikov storitev – Hranjenje in razkritje določenih podatkov o prometu – Obveznost razkritja – Omejitve – Varstvo zaupnosti elektronskih komunikacij – Skladnost z varstvom avtorske in sorodnih pravic – Pravica do učinkovitega varstva intelektualne lastnine“) (Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 5 de Madrid) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Case C-380/05: Centro Europa 7 Srl v Ministero delle Comunicazioni e Autorità per le garanzie nelle comunicazioni and Direzione generale per le concessioni e le autorizzazioni del Ministero delle Comunicazioni (Freedom to provide services — Electronic communications — Television broadcasting activities — New common regulatory framework — Allocation of radio frequencies) (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Zadeva C-380/05: Centro Europa 7 Srl proti Ministero delle Comunicazioni e Autorità per le garanzie nelle comunicazioni in Direzione generale per le concessioni e le autorizzazioni del Ministero delle Comunicazioni („Prosto opravljanje storitev – Elektronske komunikacije – Dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov – Novi skupni regulativni okvir – Dodelitev radijskih frekvenc za oddajanje“) (Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Consiglio di Stato) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 31 January 2008 . . . . . . . .
Sodba Sodi�ča (četrti senat) z dne 31. januarja 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . .
INFORMATION ON UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS
OBVESTILA O NEOBJAVLJENIH ODLOČBAH
Notice to readers of the European Court Reports
Opozorilo bralcem Zbirke odločb
The attention of readers is drawn to the fact that the full text of the decisions of the Court of Justice listed below is available on the Curia Website (http://curia.europa.eu) in the language of the case and, where relevant, in any other available language.
Bralce opozarjamo, da je celotno besedilo odločb Sodi�ča, ki so povzete v nadaljevanju, dostopno na spletni strani Curia (http://curia.europa.eu) v jeziku postopka in, odvisno od primera, v vseh drugih jezikih, ki so na voljo.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 January 2008 — Pucci v El Corte Inglés
Sklep Sodišča (šesti senat) z dne 9. januarja 2008 – Pucci proti El Corte Inglés
(Case C-104/05 P-DEP)
(Zadeva C-104/05 P-DEP)
(Taxation of costs)
„Določitev stro�kov“
Procedure — Costs — Taxation — Recoverable costs (Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 73(b)) (see para. 10)
Postopek – Stroški – Določitev – Stroški, ki se lahko povrnejo (Poslovnik Sodišča, člen 73(b)) (Glej točko 10.)
The total amount of the costs which El Corte Inglés SA must reimburse to Emilio Pucci Srl is fixed at EUR 5 600.
Celotni znesek stro�kov, ki jih mora družba El Corte Inglés SA plačati družbi Emilio Pucci Srl, je 5600 EUR.
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 January 2008 — Commission v Finland
Sodba Sodišča (drugi senat) z dne 10. januarja 2008 – Komisija proti Finski
(Case C-387/06)
(Zadeva C-387/06)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Telecommunications sector — Article 8(1), (2)(b) and (3)(c) of Directive 2002/21/EC (‘Framework’ Directive) — Article 8(1) and (4) of Directive 2002/19/
„Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Sektor telekomunikacij – Člen 8(1), (2)(b) in (3)(c) Direktive 2002/21/ES (Okvirna direktiva) – Člen 8(1) in (4) Direktive 2002/19/ES (Direktiva o dostopu) –
EC (‘Access’ Directive) — Electronic communications networks and services — Fixed and mobile telephone networks — Termination of calls — Incoming traffic — Limit on the powers of the national authority for communications regulation)
Elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve – Omrežja fiksne in mobilne telefonije – Končevanje klicev – Dohodni klici – Omejitev pooblastil nacionalnega organa za urejanje komunikacij“
Procedure — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 38(1)(c)) (see para. 14)
Postopek – Vloga, s katero se začne postopek – Zahteve obličnosti (Poslovnik Sodišča, člen 38(1)(c)) (Glej točko 14.)
Actions for failure to fulfil obligations — Proof of failure — Burden of proof on the Commission (Art. 226 CE) (see paras 24, 25)
Tožba zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti – Dokaz neizpolnitve obveznosti – Dokazno breme, ki ga nosi Komisija (člen 226 ES) (Glej točki 24 in 25.)
Action for failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to fulfil obligations under Article 8(1), (2)(b) and (3)(c) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Neizpolnitev obveznosti države iz člena 8(1) in (2)(b) in (3)(c) Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/21/ES z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (UL L 108, str.
33) and under Article 8(1) and (4) of Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (‘Access’ Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 7).
33) in iz člena 8(1) in (4) Direktive 2002/19/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju (Direktiva o dostopu) (UL L 108, str. 7).
The Court:
Izrek
Dismisses the action;
Tožba se zavrne.
Orders the Commission of the European Communities and the Republic of Finland to bear their own costs.
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti in Republika Finska nosita vsaka svoje stro�ke.
(Joined Cases C-105/04 P-DEP and C-113/04 P-DEP)
(Združeni zadevi C-105/04 P-DEP in C-113/04 P-DEP)
Procedure — Costs — Taxation — Courts having jurisdiction on appeal (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 69(1); Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Art. 87(1) (see paras 21-23)
Postopek – Stroški – Določitev – Pristojno sodišče v primeru pritožbe (Poslovnik Sodišča člen 69(1); Poslovnik Sodišča prve stopnje, člen 87(1), (Glej točke od 21 do 23.)
Procedure — Costs — Taxation — Recoverable costs — Matters to be taken into consideration (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 73(b)) (see paras 25, 39)
Postopek – Stroški – Določitev – Stroški, ki se povrnejo – Dejavniki, ki jih je treba upoštevati (Poslovnik Sodišča, člen 73 (b)) (Glej točki 25 in 39.)
Procedure — Costs — Taxation — Recoverable costs — Intervener (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 73(b)) (see para. 33)
Postopek – Stroški – Določitev – Stroški, ki se povrnejo – Intervenient (Poslovnik Sodišča, člen 73 (b)) (Glej točko 33.)
Procedure — Costs — Taxation — Recoverable costs — Several lawyers involved (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 73(b)) (see paras 41, 42)
Postopek – Stroški – Določitev – Stroški, ki se povrnejo – Sodelovanje več odvetnikov (Poslovnik Sodišča, člen 73 (b)) (Glej točki 41 in 42.)
Application for taxation of costs following the judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 September 2006.
Predlog za določitev stro�kov po izreku sodbe Sodi�ča (prvi senat) z dne 21. septembra 2006.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2008 — Molinari and Others v Agenzia delle Entrate — Ufficio di Latina
Sklep Sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 16. januarja 2008 – Molinari in drugi proti Agenzia delle Entrate – Ufficio di Latina
(Joined Cases C-128/07 to C-131/07)
(Združene zadeve od C-128/07 do C-131/07)
(Directive 76/207/EEC — Equal treatment for men and women — Redundancy payment — Tax advantage granted at a different age according to the worker’s gender)
„Direktiva 76/207/EGS – Enako obravnavanje mo�kih in žensk – Odpravnina – Davčna ugodnost, dodeljena pri različni starosti glede na spol delavcev“
Member States — Obligations — Implementation of Community law — National legislation incompatible with Community law as interpreted in a judgment delivered in response to a reference for a preliminary ruling (Art. 10 EC; Council Directives 76/207 and 79/7) (see paras 22-24, operative part 1)
Države članice – Obveznosti – Izvajanje prava Skupnosti – Neskladnost nacionalne zakonodaje s pravom Skupnosti, ki izhaja iz sodbe v zvezi z vprašanjem za predhodno odločanje (člen 10 ES; direktivi Sveta 76/207 in 79/7) (Glej točke od 22 do 24 in točko 1 izreka.)
Social policy — Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security — Directive 79/7 (Council Directive 79/7, Art. 7(1)(a)) (see paras 26, 27, operative part 2)
Socialna politika – Enako obravnavanje moških in žensk v zadevah socialne varnosti – Direktiva 79/7 (Direktiva Sveta 79/7, člen 7(1)(a)) (Glej točki 26 in 27 ter točko 2 izreka.)
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commissione Tributaria Provinicale di Latina — Interpretation of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe – Commissione tributaria provinciale di Latina – Razlaga Direktive Sveta 76/207/EGS z dne 9. februarja 1976 o izvr�evanju načela enakega obravnavanja mo�kih in žensk v zvezi z dostopom do zaposlitve,
INFORMATION ON UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (OJ 1976 L 39, p.
OBVESTILA O NEOBJAVLJENIH ODLOČBAH poklicnega usposabljanja in napredovanja ter delovnih pogojev (UL L 39, str.
40) and Council Directive 79/7/EEC on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security (OJ 1979 L 6. p.
40) in Direktive Sveta 79/7/EGS o postopnem izvr�evanju načela enakega obravnavanja mo�kih in žensk v zadevah socialne varnosti (UL L 6, str.
24) — Interpretation and scope of the judgment in Case C-207/04 Vergani — Application of a reduced rate of tax in respect of sums received by way of voluntary redundancy incentive for workers who have reached a particular age — Tax advantage granted to workers at different ages according to their gender.
24) – Razlaga in obseg sodbe Vergani (C-207/04) – Uporaba nižjega davka za zneske, prejete ob prenehanju delovnega razmerja, za spodbujanje upokojevanja delavcev pri določeni starosti – Davčna ugodnost, dodeljena delavcem pri različni starosti glede na spol.
Following the judgment of 21 July 2005 in Case C-207/04 Vergani, in which national legislation was found to be incompatible with Community law, it is for the authorities of the Member State concerned to adopt the general or specific measures necessary to ensure that Community law is complied with in their territory, those authorities retaining the choice of measures to be taken to ensure that national law is changed so as to comply with Community law and that the rights which individuals derive from Community law are given full effect.
Na podlagi sodbe z dne 21. julija 2005 v zadevi Vergani (C-207/04), v kateri je bila ugotovljena neskladnost nacionalne zakonodaje s pravom Skupnosti, morajo organi zadevne države članice sprejeti splo�ne ali posebne ukrepe, da na svojem ozemlju zagotovijo spo�tovanje prava Skupnosti, pri čemer navedeni organi obdržijo pravico do izbire ukrepov, ki jih je treba sprejeti, da bo nacionalno pravo usklajeno s pravom Skupnosti in bodo pravice, ki jih imajo upravičenci na podlagi prava Skupnosti, polno učinkovale.
Where there has been found to be discrimination contrary to Community law, for as long as measures reinstating equal treatment have not been adopted, a national court must set aside any discriminatory provision of national law, without having to request or await its prior removal by the legislature, and apply to members of the disadvantaged category the same arrangements as those enjoyed by the persons in the other category.
Kadar je ugotovljena diskriminacija, ki je v nasprotju s pravom Skupnosti, nacionalno sodi�če, dokler niso sprejeti ukrepi za vzpostavitev enakega obravnavanja, ne sme uporabiti nobene diskriminatorne nacionalne določbe, ne da bi moralo zahtevati ali čakati, da to določbo predhodno odpravi zakonodajalec, za člane skupine, ki se manj ugodno obravnava, pa mora uporabiti enaka ureditev, kot je ta, do katere so upravičeni člani druge skupine.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2008 — Polier v Najar
Sklep Sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 16. januarja 2008 – Polier proti Najar
(Case C-361/07)
(Zadeva C-361/07)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Convention No 158 of the International Labour Organisation — European Social Charter — Dismissal of an employee without valid reason — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
„Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe – Listina o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije – Konvencija �t. 158 Mednarodne organizacije dela – Evropska socialna listina – Odpoved delovnega razmerja brez utemeljitve – Očitna nepristojnost Sodi�ča“
Preliminary rulings — Jurisdiction of the Court — Limits (Art. 234 EC) (see paras 10, 11)
Vprašanja za predhodno odločanje – Pristojnosti Sodišča – Meje (člen 234 ES) (Glej točki 10 in 11.)
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conseil de Prud’Hommes de Beauvais — Interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Arts 30 and 33), the European Social Charter (Arts 24 and 27), and of Convention No 158 of the International Labour Organisation, as regards termination of employment — Dismissal of an employee without valid reason — Whether national legislation is valid in the light of the abovementioned provisions.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe – Conseil de prud’hommes de Beauvais – Razlaga Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije (člena 30 in 33), Evropske socialne listine (člena 24 in 27) in Konvencije �t. 158 Mednarodne organizacije dela glede odpovedi delovnega razmerja – Odpoved delavčevega delovnega razmerja brez utemeljitve – Veljavnost nacionalnih predpisov glede na navedena pravila.
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 January 2008 — Commission v Greece
Sodba Sodišča (šesti senat) z dne 17. januarja 2008 – Komisija proti Grčiji
(Case C-342/07)
(Zadeva C-342/07)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2002/91/EC — Energy policy — Energy saving — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
„Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Direktiva 2002/91/ES – Energetska politika – Varčevanje energije – Neopravljen prenos v predpisanem roku“
Actions for failure to fulfil obligations — Examination of merits by the Court — Situation to be taken into consideration — Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 6)
Tožba zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti – Preizkus utemeljenosti, ki ga opravi Sodišče – Upoštevni položaj – Stanje po izteku roka, določenega v obrazloženem mnenju (člen 226 ES) (Glej točko 6.)
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 65).
Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Nesprejetje predpisov, potrebnih za uskladitev z Direktivo 2002/91/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2002 o energetski učinkovitosti stavb (UL L 1, str. 65), v predpisanem roku.
Declares that by not having adopted, within the prescribed period, the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures necessary to comply with Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
Helenska republika s tem, da v predpisanem roku ni sprejela vseh zakonov in drugih predpisov, potrebnih za uskladitev z Direktivo 2002/91/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2002 o energetski učinkovitosti stavb, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz te direktive.
Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.
Helenski republiki se naloži plačilo stro�kov.
(Case C-229/07)
(Zadeva C-229/07)
(Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Article 23 of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council — Freedom of establishment — Recognition of diplomas, qualifications and experience — Situation of a national of a nonmember State, the holder of a degree in medicine issued by that nonmember State and recognised by a Member State, wishing to obtain authorisation to practise her profession as a doctor in another Member State where she resides lawfully with her spouse, a national of the latter Member State)
„Člen 104(3) Poslovnika – Člen 23 Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/38/ES – Svoboda ustanavljanja – Priznavanje diplom, dokazil in pridobljenih izku�enj – Položaj državljana tretje države, ki ima diplomo iz medicine, ki jo je izdala ta tretja država in jo je priznala država članica, in ki želi pridobiti dovoljenje za opravljanje poklica zdravnika v drugi državi članici, v kateri zakonito prebiva s svojim zakoncem, državljanom te slednje države članice“
Freedom of movement for persons — Workers — Right of members of the family to take paid employment — Community legislation — Inapplicable in a situation which is purely internal to a Member State (European Parliament and Council Directive No 2004/38, Art. 23) (see paras 15, 19, 20)
Prosto gibanje oseb – Delavci – Pravica družinskih članov do zaposlitve – Skupnostna ureditev – Neuporaba za popolnoma notranji položaj države članice (Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/38, člen 23) (Glej točke 15, 19 in 20.)
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal administratif de Paris — Interpretation of Article 23 of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the rights of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe – Tribunal administratif de Paris – Razlaga člena 23 Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/38/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic, ki spreminja Uredbo (EGS) �t.
77, and corrigenda OJ 2004 L 229, p. 35, and OJ 2005 L 197, p.
1612/68 in razveljavlja direktive 64/221/EGS, 68/360/EGS, 72/194/EGS, 73/148/EGS, 75/34/EGS, 75/35/EGS, 90/364/EGS, 90/365/EGS in 93/96/EGS (UL L 158, str.
34) — Mutual recognition of diplomas and freedom of establishment — Obligation to take account of all the diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications and of the relevant experience of the person concerned — Situation of a national of a nonmember State, the holder of a degree in medicine issued by that nonmember State and recognised by a Member State, wishing to obtain authorisation to practise her profession as a doctor in another Member State where she resides lawfully with her spouse, a Community national.
77) – Vzajemno priznavanje diplom in svoboda ustanavljanja – Obveznost upo�tevanja vseh diplom, spričeval in drugih dokazil ter ustreznih izku�enj, ki jih je pridobila zainteresirana oseba – Položaj državljana tretje države, ki ima diplomo iz medicine, ki jo je izdala ta tretja država in jo je priznala država članica, in ki želi pridobiti dovoljenje za opravljanje poklica zdravnika v drugi državi članici, v kateri zakonito prebiva s svojim zakoncem, državljanom Skupnosti.
Article 23 of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the rights of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC does not preclude a Member State from refusing to allow a national of a non-Member State, who is married to a Community national who has not exercised his right to freedom of movement, to rely on the Community rules relating to the mutual recognition of diplomas and to the freedom of establishment, and does not require the competent authorities of the Member State, from which authorisation to practise a regulated profession is sought, to take into consideration all the diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications, even if they were obtained outside the European Union, unless they have been recognised in another Member State, and the relevant experience of the person concerned, by comparing the specialised knowledge and abilities certified by those diplomas and that experience with the knowledge and qualifications required by the national rules.
Člen 23 Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2004/38/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic, ki spreminja Uredbo (EGS) �t. 1612/68 in razveljavlja direktive 64/221/EGS, 68/360/EGS, 72/194/EGS, 73/148/EGS, 75/34/EGS, 75/35/EGS, 90/364/EGS, 90/365/EGS in 93/96/EGS, ne nasprotuje temu, da država članica državljanu tretje države, ki je zakonec državljana Skupnosti, ki ni koristil svoje pravice do prostega gibanja, ne omogoči sklicevanja na pravila Skupnosti v zvezi z vzajemnim priznavanjem diplom in v zvezi s svobodo ustanavljanja ter ne nalaga pristojnim organom države članice, pri katerih se zaprosi za dovoljenje za opravljanje zakonsko urejenega poklica, da upo�tevajo vse diplome, spričevala in druga dokazila, čeprav so bili pridobljeni zunaj Evropske unije in so bili vsaj priznani v drugi državi članici, ter ustrezne izku�nje zainteresirane osebe, tako da izvedejo primerjavo na eni strani med sposobnostjo, ki jo dokazujejo ta dokazila, in temi izku�njami in na drugi strani znanjem in usposobljenostjo, ki ju zahteva nacionalna zakonodaja.
Order of the President of 23 January 2008 — Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe v Commission
Sklep predsednika Sodišča z dne 23. januarja 2008 – Sumitomo Chemical Agro Europe proti Komisiji
(Case C-236/07 P(R))
(Zadeva C-236/07 P(R))
(Appeal — Application for interim measures — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Directive 91/414/EEC — Directive 2006/132/EC — Procymidone as an active substance — Urgency)
„Pritožba – Izdaja začasne odredbe – Predlog za odložitev izvr�itve – Direktiva 91/414/EGS – Direktiva 2006/132/ES – Aktivna snov procimidon – Nujnost“
Applications for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Interim measures — Conditions for granting — Urgency — Serious and irreparable damage — Burden of proof (Arts 242 EC and 243 EC) (see paras 23-26)
Izdaja začasne odredbe – Odložitev izvršitve – Začasni ukrepi – Pogoji za izdajo – Nujnost – Resna in nepopravljiva škoda – Dokazno breme (člena 242 ES in 243 ES) (Glej točke od 23 do 26.)