natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Finally, in the Kurz case, leave to enter was given for the purpose of training as a plumber.
V sodbi Kurz je bilo končno izdano dovoljenje za izobraževanje kot plinovodni instalater in vodoinstalater.
33 Only at first sight does that situation bear a certain resemblance to entry for the purpose of study, in that each concerns entry for the purpose of training.
33Te okoli�čine primera se samo na prvi pogled zdijo podobne vstopu zaradi �tudija, saj gre v obeh primerih za vstop zaradi izobraževanja.
Article 7(2) confers on the children of Turkish workers who have completed a course of vocational training in the host country the right to respond to any offer of employment there, irrespective of the length of time they have been resident there, provided one of their parents has been legally employed in the State concerned for at least three years.
Člen 7(2) po -deljuje otrokom tur�kih delavcev, ki so v državi gostiteljici končali poklicno izobraževanje, pravico, da se ne glede na dolžino trajanja njihovega prebivanja tam potegujejo za vsako delovno mesto, če je bil eden od star�ev tam vsaj tri leta zakonito zaposlen.
In so far as the Court expressly held in that decision that the purpose for which the person concerned was given leave to enter and stay is not relevant to the exercise of that right, that correctly takes account of the aim pursued by Article 7(2) or by the Association Agreement, namely to provide security, reliability and stability for the families of Turkish workers working in the host State.
Stali�če Sodi�ča v tej odločitvi, da namen, zaradi katerega je zadevna oseba dobila vstopno dovoljenje in dovoljenje za prebivanje, ni upo�tevno za izvajanje te pravice, to pravilno upo�teva cilj, ki mu sledi člen 7(2) oziroma Pridružitveni sporazum, namreč vzpostaviti tudi varnost, zanesljivost in stabilnost za družine tur�kih delavcev, ki so zaposleni v državi gostiteljici.
Article 7(2) thus
Člen 7(2) se s tem
In this connection it would not be compatible with the objectives mentioned to allow continued residence only to the persons who were originally given leave to enter for the purpose of family reunion and not to those who were given leave for the purpose of studies.
V tej povezavi ne bi bilo skladno z ravnokar navedenimi cilji, da bi se nadaljnje prebivanje dovolilo le tistim, ki jim je bilo prvotno vstopno dovoljenje podeljeno za namene združitve družine, in ne tudi tistim, ki jim je bilo to podeljeno za �tudijske namene.
There are no comparable interests, however, to make the purpose of the original entry appear irrelevant in the case of the general provision of Article 6(1).
V primeru splo�ne določbe člena 6(1) pa ni primerljivih interesov, da bi se namen prvotnega vstopa ne upo�teval.
The Court’s caselaw on Article 7(2) does not therefore prevent the taking into account of the purpose of entry in the context of Article 6(1).
Sodna praksa Sodi�ča v zvezi s členom 7(2) torej ne nasprotuje upo�tevanju namena vstopa v okviru člena 6(1).
can be seen for an understanding of the concept of worker that differs, in view of the spirit and purpose of the Association Agreement, from the concept in Article 39 EC.
na smisel in namen Pridružitvenega sporazuma, pa do sedaj niso razvidni – drugače kot pri vstopu zaradi �tudija.
On the contrary, the taking up of an au pair activity already constitutes in itself the taking up of an economic activity.
Nasprotno, opravljanje dela kot „aupair“ samo po sebi že pomeni opravljanje poklicnega dela.
That a particular motive for taking up that economic activity cannot affect classification as a worker in the context of Article 6 has been stated by the Court — as already demonstrated — in the Kurz and Günaydin judgments concerning vocational training and the acquisition of professional experience with the parent company.
Sodi�če je že izpeljalo – kot je bilo že prikazano – v sodbah Kurz in Günaydin glede učnega razmerja in pridobivanja delovnih izku�enj v tujini pri matični družbi –, da določena motivacija za opravljanje poklicnega dela ne more imeti vpliva na to, da se nekdo opredeli kot delavec v okviru člena 6.
That the stay as an au pair is intended precisely for the acquisition of cultural experience and deepening of linguistic knowledge cannot thus have any effect on classification as a worker.
To, da naj bi se z bivanjem kot „aupair“ prav pridobivalo kulturne izku�nje in poglobilo znanje jezikov, ne more vplivati na to, da se nekdo opredeli kot delavec.
The last question to be answered is whether there must also be a teleological restriction, in the context of the concept of worker in Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80, in the case of entry for the purpose of taking up an au pair placement, which — as shown above — will often in the particular case satisfy the requirements of the concept of worker within the meaning of Article 39 EC.
Končno je treba odgovoriti na vpra�anje, ali mora biti tudi pri vstopu zaradi zaposlitve kot „aupair“, ki – kot je bilo zgoraj prikazano – v posamičnem primeru pogosto izpolnjuje predpostavke pojma delavca v smislu člena 39 ES, v okviru pojma delavca iz člena 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80 teleolo�ka omejitev.
In this respect, however — in contrast to entry for the purpose of study — no reasons
Razlogi za razlago pojma delavca, ki odstopa od pojma delavca iz člena 39 ES glede
Nor is there reason to fear that restrictions by Member States of au pair placements to a maximum of one year, which might be occasioned by the above classification in view of the provision in Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80, will have negative effects on the cultural exchange intended by the Association Agreement.
Prav tako se ni treba bati, da bi lahko imele omejitve, ki jih postavijo države članice za službe „aupair“ na največ eno leto, ki bi jih lahko povzročila zgoraj omenjena opredelitev glede na ureditev iz člena 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80, negativne učinke na kulturno izmenjavo, ki je cilj Pridružitvenega sporazuma.
Even according to the basic idea of the au pair concept, the aims pursued by an au pair placement will normally be achieved during a stay limited to one year.
Tudi v skladu z osnovno idejo „aupair“ koncepta se lahko cilji, ki jim sledi služba „aupair“, običajno dosežejo med prebivanjem, omejenim na eno leto.
A Turkish national who has entered a Member State for the purpose of following a course of studies and carries on a secondary activity to finance his studies does not fall within the scope of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80.
Tur�ki državljan, ki je vstopil v državo članico zaradi �tudija in zaradi financiranja svojega �tudija poleg �tudija opravlja za -poslitev, ne spada na področje uporabe čle na 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80.
In the light of the above considerations, I propose that the Court should give the following answer to the Court of Appeal:
Zato Sodi�ču predlagam, naj Court of Appeal odgovori:
2008 — CASE C-294/06
2008 – ZADEVA C-294/06
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)24 January 2008 *
SODBA SODIŠČA (tretji senat) z dne 24. januarja 2008*
REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom), made by decision of 28 June 2006, received at the Court on 30 June 2006, in the proceedings
V zadevi C-294/06, katere predmet je predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe na podlagi člena 234 ES, ki ga je vložilo Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (Združeno kraljestvo) z odločbo z dne 28. junija 2006, ki je prispela na Sodi�če 30. junija 2006, v postopku The Queen, na predlog:
* Language of the case: English.
* Jezik postopka: angle�čina.
This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association (‘Decision No 1/80’).
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na razlago člena 6(1) Sklepa Pridružitvenega sveta z dne 19. septembra 1980 o razvoju pridružitve (v nadaljevanju: Sklep �t. 1/80).
The Association Council was set up by the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, signed at Ankara on 12 September 1963 by the Republic of Turkey and by the Member States of the EEC and the Community and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Decision 64/732/EEC of 23 December 1963 (OJ 1973 C 113, p. 1).
Pridružitveni svet je bil ustanovljen s sporazumom o pridružitvi med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Turčijo, ki so ga Republika Turčija na eni strani in države članice EGS in Skupnost na drugi strani podpisale v Ankari 12. septembra 1963 in ki je bil v imenu slednje sklenjen, odobren in potrjen s Sklepom Sveta 64/732/EGS z dne 23. decembra 1963 (UL 1964, 217, str. 3685).
Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 provides as follows:
V členu 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80 je določeno:
Subject to Article 7 on free access to employment for members of his family, a Turkish worker duly registered as belonging to the labour force of a Member State:
Razen v primerih, določenih s členom 7, ki ureja prost dostop do zaposlitve članov njegove družine, ima tur�ki delavec, ki je vključen v zakoniti trg dela države članice:
— shall be entitled in that Member State, after one year’s legal employment, to the renewal of his permit to work for the same employer, if a job is available;
— v tej državi članici po enem letu, odkar je zakonito zaposlen, pravico, da se mu podalj�a delovno dovoljenje pri istem delodajalcu, če ta razpolaga z delovnim mestom;
— shall be entitled in that Member State, after three years of legal employment and subject to the priority to be given to workers of Member States of the Community, to respond to another offer of employment, with an employer of his choice, made under normal conditions and registered with the employment services of that State, for the same occupation;
— v tej državi članici po preteku treh let, odkar je zakonito zaposlen, in ob pogoju, da imajo delavci iz držav članic Skupnosti pri tem prednost, pravico, da pri delodajalcu, ki ga sam izbere, sprejme delovno mesto v enakovrstnem poklicu, ponujeno pod običajnimi pogoji in prijavljeno pri službah za zaposlovanje v tej državi članici;
— shall enjoy free access in that Member State to any paid employment of his choice, after four years of legal employment.’
— v tej državi članici po preteku �tirih let, odkar je zakonito zaposlen, pravico do prostega dostopa do zaposlitve po svoji izbiri.“
‘Definition of an “au pair” placement
„Opredelitev zaposlitve ‚au-pair‘
For the purposes of these Rules an “au pair” placement is an arrangement whereby a young person:
V smislu teh pravil pomeni zaposlitev ‚au-pair‘ dogovor, v skladu s katerim oseba:
(b) lives for a time as a member of an English speaking family with appropriate opportunities for study; and
(b) živi določeno obdobje v krogu angle�ko govoreče družine, kjer ima ustrezne možnosti za �tudij, in
(c) helps in the home for a maximum of 5 hours per day in return for a reasonable allowance and with two free days per week.
(c) pomaga pri hi�nih opravilih največ pet ur na dan, za to prejema primerno plačilo in ima na razpolago dva prosta dneva na teden.
Requirements for leave to enter as an “au pair”
Pogoji za pridobitev dovoljenja za vstop (‚leave to enter‘) kot oseba ‚au-pair‘
The requirements to be met by a person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom as an “au pair” are that he:
Oseba, ki zaprosi za dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo kot ‚aupair‘, mora izpolnjevati te pogoje:
(i) is seeking entry for the purpose of taking up an arranged placement which can be shown to fall within the definition set out in paragraph 88; …
(i) v Združeno kraljestvo mora priti z namenom izvr�evanja predhodnega dogovora o zaposlitvi, ki ga je treba razumeti v smislu opredelitve, navedene zgoraj v točki 88; […]
(ii) is aged between 17-27 inclusive or was so aged when first given leave to enter in this capacity; …
(ii) stara mora biti med 17 in 27 let ali v tej starosti prejeti dovoljenje za vstop; […]
(iv) is without dependants; …
(iv) ne sme imeti vzdrževanih družinskih članov; […]
(v) is a national of one of the following countries: … Turkey; …
(v) biti mora državljan ene od teh držav: […] Turčije; […]
(vi) does not intend to stay in the United Kingdom for more than 2 years as an “au pair”; …
(vi) ne sme imeti namena ostati v Združenem kraljestvu dlje kot dve leti kot ‚aupair‘; […]
(vii) intends to leave the United Kingdom on completion of his stay as an “au pair”; …
(vii) mora imeti namen zapustiti Združeno kraljestvo po koncu prebivanja kot ‚aupair‘; […]
(viii) if he has previously spent time in the United Kingdom as an “au pair”, is not seeking leave to enter to a date beyond 2 years from the date on which he was first given leave to enter the United Kingdom in this capacity, and
(viii) če je ta oseba pred tem bivala v Združenem kraljestvu v okviru zaposlitve ‚aupair‘, ne sme zaprositi za dovoljenje za vstop, ki bi začelo veljati več kot dve leti po datumu prejetja prvega dovoljenja na tej podlagi, in
(ix) is able to maintain and accommodate himself without recourse to public funds.
(ix) mora biti sposobna vzdrževati sebe in si zagotoviti nastanitev, ne da bi za to potrebovala javna sredstva.
Leave to enter as an “au pair”
Dovoljenje za vstop kot oseba ‚au-pair‘
A person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom as an “au pair” may be admitted for a period not exceeding 2 years with a prohibition on employment except as an “au pair” provided the Immigration Officer is satisfied that each of the requirements of paragraph 89 is met. …’
Osebi, ki zaprosi za dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo v okviru zaposlitve ‚aupair‘, se to lahko odobri za obdobje, ki ni dalj�e od dveh let, če ne bo opravljala nobenega drugega dela razen dela ‚au-pair‘ in če uradnik iz urada za priseljevanje ugotovi, da so izpolnjeni vsi pogoji iz točke 89 […]“
The immigration provisions concerning students are contained in particular in paragraphs 57 to 62 of the Immigration Rules:
Določbe s področja priseljevanja �tudentov so v točkah od 57 do 62 Immigration Rules. V njih je določeno:
‘Requirements for leave to enter as a student
„Pogoji za pridobitev dovoljenja za vstop kot �tudent
The requirements to be met by a person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom as a student are that he:
Oseba, ki zaprosi za dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo kot �tudent, mora izpolnjevati te pogoje:
(i) has been accepted for a course of study at:
(i) sprejeta mora biti na �tudijski program:
(a) a publicly funded institution of further or higher education; or [there follow references to private educational institutions]; …
(a) javne visoko�olske izobraževalne ustanove ali [nekaterih primernih zasebnih izobraževalnih ustanov]; […]
(ii) is able and intends to follow either:
(ii) biti mora sposobna in imeti namen �tudirati:
(a) a recognised full-time degree course at a publicly funded institution of further or higher education; or [there follow references to other classes of full-time education]; …
(a) bodisi po rednem �tudijskem programu, ki se zaključi s priznano univerzitetno diplomo, na javni visoko�olski izobraževalni ustanovi; bodisi [po nekaterih ostalih �tudijskih programih]; […]
(iv) intends to leave the United Kingdom at the end of his studies; …
(iv) imeti mora namen zapustiti Združeno kraljestvo po koncu �tudija; […]
(v) does not intend to engage in business or take employment, except part-time or vacation work undertaken with the consent of the Secretary of State for Employment, and
(v) ne sme imeti namena izvr�evati poslovne dejavnosti ali sprejeti zaposlitve, razen dela s kraj�im delovnim časom ali počitni�kega dela, ki ga odobri Secretary of State for Employment, in
(vi) is able to meet the costs of his course and accommodation and the maintenance of himself and any dependants without taking employment or engaging in business or having recourse to public funds.
(vi) sposobna mora biti kriti stro�ke svojega �tudija, svojih osebnih potreb in potreb oseb, ki jih vzdržuje, vključno z nastanitvijo, ne da bi bila zaposlena, izvr�evala poslovno dejavnost ali potrebovala javna sredstva.
Leave to enter as a student
Dovoljenje za vstop kot �tudent
A person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom as a student may be admitted for an appropriate period depending on the length of his course of study and his means, and with a condition restricting his freedom to take employment …’
Osebi, ki zaprosi za dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo kot �tudent, se to lahko odobri za primerno obdobje, ki se izračuna na podlagi trajanja �tudijskega programa in sredstev, s katerimi razpolaga ta oseba, ter pod pogojem, ki tej osebi omejuje pravico sprejeti zaposlitev […]“
Under paragraph 4 of Annex A to Chapter 3, Section 1, of the instructions of the Immigration Directorate of the Secretary of State (‘the Immigration Directorate’s Instructions’):
V prilogi A, točka 4, k poglavju 3 navodil direktorata za priseljevanje pri Secretary of State („Immigrations Directorate’s Instructions“) je določeno:
‘Students over the age of 16 who are on Code 2 conditions [which include a condition restricting freedom to take up employment] may take part-time or vacation work without needing to seek the permission of the local Jobcentre.
„Študenti, ki so starej�i od 16 let in za katere veljajo pogoji, določeni v Code 2 (pogoj, ki omejuje njihovo pravico sprejeti zaposlitev), lahko opravljajo delo s kraj�im delovnim časom ali počitni�ko delo, ne da bi potrebovali odobritev območne agencije za zaposlovanje [‚območni Jobcenter‘].
Similarly they will be able to take up work placements which are part of a sandwich course or to undertake internship placements without the need to obtain permission from the [competent authorities of the United Kingdom].
Prav tako lahko zasedejo delovno mesto v okviru univerzitetnega programa, ki vključuje delo, ali opravljajo poklicno prakso, ne da bi potrebovali delovno dovoljenje [ki ga izdajo pristojni organi Združenega kraljestva].
Students should not work for more than 20 hours a week during term time, …’
Študenti ne smejo delati več kot 20 ur na teden med �olskim letom […].“
The actions in the main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Spora o glavni stvari in vprašanji za predhodno odločanje
As soon as Ms Payir arrived in the United Kingdom, she was engaged as an au pair by a family.
Payir zaposlena kot „aupair“ pri prvi družini in od marca 2001 pri drugi družini, za katero je delala med 15 in 25 ur na teden.
Then, from March 2001, she was engaged as an au pair by a second family, for whom she worked between 15 and 25 hours per week in return for bed and board, and payment of GBP 70 (approximately EUR 103) per week.
Nudili so ji hrano ter nastanitev in prejemala je plačilo v vi�ini 70 GBP (oko li 103 EUR) na teden.
In April 2002, before her leave to enter expired, Ms Payir applied to the Secretary of State for leave to remain in the United Kingdom, in reliance upon Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80.
Aprila 2002, pred iztekom veljavnosti dovoljenja za vstop, je E. Payir pri Secretary of State zaprosila za nadaljnje dovoljenje za prebivanje v Združenem kraljestvu in pri tem na podlagi člena 6(1) Sklepa �t.
She submitted that she had been engaged by the same employer for more than one year and that she wished to continue to be employed by that employer.
1/80 navedla, da je bila zaposlena več kot eno leto pri istem delodajalcu in da želi delo pri njem nadaljevati. Njena pro�nja je bila zavrnjena z odločbo z dne 18. avgusta 2004.
Ms Payir’s leave to enter was extended until 2 August 2006.
Secretary of State je vložilo pritožbo zoper odločitev High Court, ker naj se člen 6(1) Sklepa �t.
In October 2005, she took up employment as a shop assistant.
1/80 ne bi nana�al na osebe „au-pair“.
Mr Akyuz and Mr Ozturk entered the United Kingdom in 1999 and 1997 respectively, with leave to enter as students.
Ozturk sta v Združeno kraljestvo pri�la leta 1999 oziroma leta 1997 kot �tudenta na podlagi dovoljenj za vstop, nato pa sta pridobila dovoljenji za prebivanje.
During their studies, Mr Akyuz and Mr Ozturk worked part-time as waiters in a restaurant and were offered an extension of their contracts by their employers.
Ob �tudiju sta ta tur�ka državljana delala s kraj�im delovnim časom kot natakarja v restavraciji in njuna delodajalca sta jima ponudila podalj�anje njunih pogodb o zaposlitvi.
Contending that Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 does not apply to students, the Secretary of State appealed against the decisions of the High Court.
Secretary of State je vložilo pritožbo zoper odločbi, ki ju je sprejelo High Court, ker naj se člen 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80 ne bi nana�al na �tudente.
The Court of Appeal points out that the three Turkish nationals were regarded by the High Court as workers within the meaning given to that concept by the Court of Justice, in particular in Case C-1/97 Birden [1998] ECR I-7747, paragraph 24.
To sodi�če je ugotovilo, da je High Court obravnavalo te tri tur�ke državljane kot delavce v smislu, kot je ta pojem opredelilo Sodi�če, in sicer v sodbi z dne 26. novembra 1998 v zadevi Birden (C-1/97, Recueil, str. I-7747, točka 24).
While fully accepting that finding on the part of the High Court, the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) takes the view that it is also necessary to take into account the caselaw of the Court of Justice according to which Member States may introduce schemes with a social purpose. It follows from that caselaw that, even though such schemes involve the carrying out of an activity as a worker, they do not necessarily imply integration of the persons concerned in the labour force of those States.
Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) kljub sprejemanju te ugotovitve High Court meni, da je treba upo�tevati tudi sodno prakso Sodi�ča, v skladu s katero lahko države članice vzpostavijo ureditve s socialnim namenom. Iz te sodne prakse naj bi izhajalo, da čeprav te ureditve zajemajo opravljanje dejavnosti s strani zadevnih oseb kot delavcev, ne vodijo nujno k njihovi vključitvi v zakoniti trg dela teh držav. 18
In the main proceedings, the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) is not certain whether the Turkish nationals concerned may rely on Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80. In those circumstances, that court decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling:
Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) v zadevah v glavni stvari ni gotovo, ali se lahko zadevni tur�ki državljani sklicujejo na določbe člena 6(1) Sklepa 1/80. V teh okoli�činah je to sodi�če prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo ti vpra�anji: „1.
‘(1) In a case in which:
Ali je v primeru, če:
— a Turkish national was granted leave to enter the United Kingdom for two years in order to take up a placement in that country as an “au pair” as defined in the … Immigration Rules; …
— je bilo tur�ki državljanki izdano dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo za dve leti v okviru zaposlitve ‚au pair‘, kot je opredeljeno v [Immigration Rules]; […]
— her leave to enter included permission to be employed in that capacity; …
— je njeno dovoljenje za vstop vključevalo dovoljenje za zaposlitev v tem okviru; […]
— she was continuously employed in that capacity by the same employer for a period exceeding one year during her leave to enter; …
— je bila v tem okviru nepretrgoma zaposlena pri istem delodajalcu za obdobje, dalj�e od enega leta, v času veljavnosti svojega dovoljenja za vstop; […]
— that employment was a genuine and effective economic activity, and
— je bila ta zaposlitev resnična in dejanska gospodarska dejavnost, in
— that employment was in accordance with national laws relating to employment and immigration; then, was the Turkish national concerned, during that employment:
— je bila ta zaposlitev v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo v zvezi z zaposlovanjem in priseljevanjem, bila zadevna tur�ka državljanka v času svoje zaposlitve:
— a worker within the meaning of Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 …?
— delavka v smislu člena 6 Sklepa �t. 1/80 […]?
— duly registered as belonging to the labour force of the United Kingdom within the meaning of that Article?
— vključena v zakoniti trg dela Združenega kraljestva v smislu tega člena?