natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A pre-adoption screening procedure for all draft technical regula-tions and standards relating to products was therefore established and gradually expanded.
Glede na poroｲilo Komisije za leto 2002, ki je analiziralo ovire pri svobodi opravljanja storitev in vzpostavitve notranjega tr-ga, se slu™be Komisije ukvarjajo z morebitno razþiritvijo Direk-tive 98/34, tako da bi zajela þe druge storitve poleg storitev informacijske dru™be.
The Commission, the Member States, in-dustry and individuals thus have an open window upon technical activities, which enables them to eliminate at source any barriers to the free movement of goods.
Komisija, dr™ave ｲlani-ce, industrija in posamezniki imajo tako odprto okno za tehniｲ-ne dejavnosti, ki jim omogoｲajo, da pri viru odstranijo vse ovire za prosti pretok blaga.
Following a 2002 Commission Report which analysed barriers to the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establish-ment in the Internal Market, the Commission's services are work-ing on the possible extension of Directive 98/34 to cover services other than Information Society services.
V zadnjih 20 letih se je obseg Direktive postopoma razþirjal, tako da je zajel vse industrijske, kmetijske in ribiþke proizvode.
Industry, as well as the Commission and the Member States, is involved in the noti«cationprocedure.Besidesbeingabletoexamine legislation in their own countries, enterprises in the Member States have the opportunity of examining legislation proposed by countries to which they export or wish to export or to which they provide or envisage to provide Information Society services.
prilo™nost tudi pregledati zakonodajo, ki jo predlagajo dr™ave, v katere izva™ajo ali ™elijo izva™ati oziroma za katere zagotavlja-jo ali naｲrtujejo zagotavljati storitve informacijske dru™be.
As a consequence, they can plan to adapt their products or services to the new requirements; they can also identify protectionist elements in the drafts and take ac-tion to have them eliminated.
Zato lahko podjetja naｲrtujejo, da bodo prilagajala svoje proizvode ali storitve novim zahtevam: lahko tudi opredeljujejo zaþｲitne elemente v osnutkih in ukrepajo, da jih odpravijo.
In order to use the system to full advantage, industry must therefore know how it works and how to access the noti«edtexts.
Da bi bil sistem kar najbolj uporaben, mora industrija vedeti, kako deluje in kako priti do priglaþenih besedil.
This may be done by means of a visit to our public data-base at the following address: http://europa.eu.int/comm/ enterprise/tris.
To je mogoｲe opraviti z vpogledom v naþo javno podatkovno zbirko na na-slednjem naslovu: http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris.
This booklet is one of a number of Commission initiatives de-signed to bring Community law closer to those who use it.
Ta knji™ica je ena od þtevilnih pobud Komisije, ki naj bi zakono-dajo Skupnosti pribli™ale tistim, ki jo uporabljajo.
My hope is that its publication will help to enhance the exchange of information, dialogue and cooperation which has constitut-ed a new community culture.
Upam, da bo njena izdaja pomagala krepiti izmenjavo informacij, dialog in sodelovanje, ki je nova kultura skupnosti.
Sabine Lecrenier Head of Unit Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry
Sabine L e c r e n i e r V o d j a e n o t e G e n e r a l n i direktorat za podjetniþtvoin industrijo
The exchange of information is carried out in accordance with a two-pronged procedure which divides the Directive into two distinct but complementary parts.
Uvod: Direktiva 98/34/ES, instrument preglednosti v prid notranjemu trgu nih standardov med nacionalnimi organi za standardizacijo, evropskimi organi za standardizacijo, namreｲ CEN (Evropski ko-mite za standardizacijo), CENELEC (Evropski komite za standar-dizacijo v elektrotehniki) in ETSI (Evropski inþtitut za telekomu-nikacijske standarde), ter Evropsko komisijo.
Introduction: Directive 98/34/EC, an instrument of transparency at the service of the Internal Market
Na zaｲetku osemdesetih let je Komisija na podlagi sklepa So-diþｲa, poznanega kot sodba ¶Cassis de Dijonƒ, zaｲela z novo po-litiko, naｲrtovano za vzpostavitev notranjega trga na podlagi treh konceptov:
At the beginning of the 1980s the Commission, basing itself on a Court of Justice ruling known as the `Cassis de Dijon' judg-ment, launched a new policy designed to complete the inter-nal market on the basis of three concepts:
› sprejetju proizvodov, ki so zakonsko izdelani v preostali Skup-nosti (¶medsebojno priznavanjeƒ), v vsaki dr™avi ｲlanici;
The «rstpartrelatestotheprocedurefortheprovisionofinfor-mation on new national initiatives which should lead to the formulation of national standards between the national stand-ardisation bodies, the European standardisation bodies, name-ly CEN (European Committee for Standardisation), CENELEC (European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation) and ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), and the European Commission.
Drugi del Direktive je naslovljen na dr™ave ｲlanice, ki so se do-govorile, da bodo sodelovale pri vzajemni preglednosti in siste-mu spremljanja na regulativnem podroｲju. Ta pobuda je bila izvirna z veｲ vidikov:
The Commission has given the European standardisation bodies responsibility for implement-ing this procedure, by means of an annual contract.
› uskladitvi, omejeni na pomembne gospodarske sektorje, ki zajemajo zlasti zdravje, varnost in okolje;
› Acceptance in each Member State of products lawfully man-ufactured in the rest of the Community (`mutual recogni-tion');
› pristopu za spremljanje nacionalnih predpisov, ki temelji na prepreｲevanju.
› Harmonisation limited to important economic sectors cover-ing, in particular, health, safety and the environment;
› Sistem ima preventivni pomen: informacije se zbirajo, ko so tehniｲni predpisi o proizvodih ali predpisi o storitvah infor-macijske dru™be þe na stopnji osnutka in se lahko spremeni-jo, zato da se uskladijo z naｲeli notranjega trga.
The second part of the Directive is addressed to the Member States who have agreed to take part in a reciprocal transpar-ency and monitoring system in the regulatory «eld.Thisinitia-tive was original in several ways:
Od leta 1984 Direktiva 83/189/EGS, ki je pozneje po kodi«kaci-ji postala Direktiva 98/34/ES, doloｲa preventivni mehanizem, katerega obseg se je postopoma poveｲeval.
› A prevention-based approach to monitoring national regu-lations.
› Komisija ni edina, ki lahko v obdobjih mirovanja pregleduje in preverja besedila, temveｲ lahko to storijo tudi vse dr™ave ｲlanice.
› The system is of a preventive nature: information is provided when technical regulations relating to products or rules on Information Society services are still at the draft stage, and may be amended in order to conform with the principles of the internal market.
Danes so dr™ave ｲlanice Evropske unije obvezane, da priglasijo Komisiji in drugim dr™avam ｲlanicam vsak osnutek tehniｲnega predpisa v zvezi s proizvodi in storitvami informacijske dru™be, preden ga sprejmejo v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Since 1984, Directive 83/189/EEC which, following codi«ca-tion later became Directive 98/34/EC, has laid down a preven-tive mechanism, the scope of which has been progressively extended.
Koncept je bil v tistem ｲasu revolucionaren in je tak tudi ostal, tako da Komisija preverja, ali bi ga bilo mogoｲe razþiriti na dru-ga podroｲja.
Today, the Member States of the European Union are obliged to notify to the Commission and to the other Member States any draft technical regulation concerning products and Infor-mation Society services before they are adopted in national law.
› Sistem tudi dovoljuje mirovanje nacionalnega osnutka zako-nodaje neko obdobje, da se na ravni Skupnosti omogoｲi raz-prava o zadevi v smislu usklajevalnih pobud. Poleg tega se s to zakonodajno opazovalnico la™je prepoznajo potrebe po usklajevanju.
The concept was revolutionary at the time and has remained so - to the extent that the Commission is examining whether it could be extended to other areas.
Izmenjava informacij se opravi po dvostopenjskem postopku, ki deli Direktivo na dva razliｲna, vendar dopolnilna dela.
› It is not only the Commission which can examine and mon-itor the texts through the operation of standstill periods, but also all the Member States; the latter have acknowl-edged the advantages of a procedure which allows for re-ciprocal i n ‹ u e n c e o v e r t h e i r l effg i s l a t i v e p r o c e s s e s .
Prvi del se nanaþa na postopek za zbiranje informacij o novih nacionalnih pobudah, ki naj bi vodile k oblikovanju nacional-
T h e T r e a - t y itself merely made provision for retrospective monitoring by the Member States, through the use of the more cum-bersome infringement procedures which are rarely applied between Member States.
Sistem je po poｲasnem zaｲetku dobil zagon in je Komisiji, dr™a-vam ｲlanicam in podjetjem zagotovil vpogled v dejavnosti na-cionalnih organov in organov za standardizacijo na tehniｲnem
8.Directive of 22 June 1998. OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37.
8.Direktiva z dne 22. junija 1998. UL L 204, 21.7.1998, str. 37.
› The system also permits national draft legislation to be put on ice for a certain period to facilitate discussion at Com-munity level on the matter in the light of harmonisation initiatives. Moreover, by means of this legislative observa-tory, the real needs for harmonisation can be identi«edmore easily.
S tem instrumentom Komisija ne uspeva samo odpravljati do-loｲb, ki so v nasprotju z zakonodajo Skupnosti, temveｲ tudi pri-speva k oblikovanju doloｲb, ki z vkljuｲitvijo v nacionalno zako-nodajo zagotovijo, da se gospodarski subjekti v celoti seznanijo s svojimi pravicami in da se dovoli uporaba naｲela ¶vzajemnega priznavanjaƒ, zajetega v razlagi ｲlenov 28 et seq. Pogodbe.
The application of the noti«cationprocedurehasgivenrisetonew practices.
podroｲju (v predpise, ki se nanaþajo na sestavino proizvoda, oznaｲevanje, ime, preskuþanje itd., pa tudi v predpise, ki se na-naþajo na ™ivljenjsko dobo proizvoda do odstranitve).
An entire philosophy of information exchange, dialogue and cooperation has evolved between the Member States.
Obseg Direktive se je postopoma þiril, tako da zdaj zajema vse kme-tijske in industrijsko izdelane proizvode ter upoþteva vedno veｲ doloｲb, zlasti da se prepreｲi katerim koli ukrepom, ki zahte-vajo posredno uskladitev s tehniｲnimi speci«kacijami,dabi izginili iz omre™ja.
This mechanism has also proved to be a formidable benchmarking tool which allows Member States to draw on the ideas of their partners in order to solve common problems regarding technical regulations, especially in newly regulated sectors such as GMOs, domain names and gene therapy.
Leta 1998 se je postopek razþiril z Direktivo 98/48/ES, da bi vkljuｲeval predpise o storitvah informativne dru™be.
Moreover, the Commission is using Directive 98/34/EC as an educational tool with a view to adjusting Member States' legis-lative style.
Direktiva 98/34/ES, ki se je od leta 1990 v dr™avah Efte ™e deloma izvajala, se je delno razþirila tudi na Turｲijo v okviru pri-dru™itvenega sporazuma s to dr™avo.
Through this instrument, the Commission not only succeeds in removing provisions which are contrary to Community law, but also contributes to the formulation of provisions to be written into national legislation to ensure that economic operators are fully informed of their rights and permit application in practice of the principle of `mutual recognition' contained in the Euro-pean Court of Justice (ECJ) interpretation of Articles 28 et seq. of the Treaty.
Skladno s tem naｲelom mora vsaka dr™ava ｲlanica na svojem ozemlju sprejeti prodajo vsakega proizvoda, ki je zakonito proiz-veden ali tr™en v drugi dr™avi ｲlanici, ob upoþtevanju, da ti proiz-vodi jamｲijo enakovredno raven zaþｲite, kadar gre za zakonite in-terese, kakrþna so zdravstvena in varnostna vpraþanja.
The scope of the Directive has been progressively extended, so that it now covers all agricultural and industrially manufactured products and takes account of an ever growing number of pro-visions, in particular to prevent any measures which indirectly require compliance with technical speci«cationsfromslippingthrough the net.
Posledica tega sprejetja proizvodov iz preostale Skupnosti, s Sporazumom o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru razþirjenega na proizvode iz dr™av Efte, podpisnic sporazuma, je vzajemno priznavanje pred-pisov, ki se nanaþa na oblikovanje, izdelavo in preskuþanje proiz-vodov in na uporabljene postopke za ugotavljanje skladnosti.
In 1998, the procedure was extended by Di-rective 98/48/EC to encompass rules on Information Society services.
Dr-™ave ｲlanice in Komisija so obveþｲene o teh predpisih s postopkom za zbiranje informacij, doloｲenim v Direktivi 98/34/ES.
According to this principle, each Member State must accept the sale in its territory of any product lawfully manufactured or marketed in another Member State, subject, where legitimate interests, such as health and safety questions are at stake, to these products guaranteeing an equivalent level of protection.
Uporaba postopka priglaþanja je spodbudila nove prakse. Med dr™avami ｲlanicami se je razvila celotna «lozo«jaizmenjavein-formacij, dialoga in sodelovanja.
The corollary to this acceptance of products from the rest of
Ta mehanizem se je izkazal tudi za pomembno primerjalno orodje, ki dovoljuje dr™avam ｲlani-cam, da pribli™ajo ideje svojih partnerjev za reþitev skupnih pro-blemov glede tehniｲnih predpisov, zlasti v novo urejenih sektor-jih, kakrþni so GSO, imena domen in gensko zdravljenje.
The geographical scope of the Directive was also gradually ex-tended. Directive 98/34/EC, which was already implemented in part in the EFTA countries since 1990, has also been partly extended to Turkey under the Association Agreement with that country.
Tudi doloｲbe Sklepa 1/95 Pridru™itvenega sveta ES-Turｲija z dne 22. decembra 1995 o izvajanju konｲne stopnje carinske unije, ki predvideva odpravo koliｲinskih omejitev ali ukrepov z enako-vrednim uｲinkom med EU in Turｲijo, se zaradi izvajanja in upora-be proizvodov, ki jih zajema Evropska unija, prav tako razlagajo kot skladne z ustreznimi odloｲitvami Sodiþｲa Evropskih skupno-sti v zvezi z doloｲbami Pogodbe ES, zlasti ｲlenov 28 do 30.
The Directive has also provided a model for a Convention of the Council of Europe.
Poleg tega Komisija uporablja Direktivo 98/34/ES kot izobra™e-valno orodje z namenom usmerjanja naｲinov oblikovanja zakonodaje dr™av ｲlanic.
Directive 83/189/EEC was amended principally by Council Directive 88/182/EEC of 22 March 1988 (OJ L 81, 26.3.1988, p.
Direktiva 83/189/EGS je bila v glavnem spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 88/182/EGS z dne 22. marca 1988 (UL L 81, 26.3.1988, str.
75) and by European Parliament and Council Directive 94/10/EC of 23 March 1994 (OJ L 100, 19.4.1994, p. 30).
75) in z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 94/10/ES z dne 23. marca 1994 (UL L 100, 19.4.1994, str. 30).
Directive 98/34/EC of 22 June 1998 c o d i « e d D i r e c t i v e 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C a n d a l l i t s s u bse q u e n t a mffe n d - mffe n t s while Directive 98/48/EC of 20 July 1998 amended Directive 98/34/EC.
Direktiva 98/34/ES z dne 22. junija 1998 je k o d i « c i r a l a D i r e k t i v o 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E G S i n vse njene naknadne spremembe, medtem ko je Direktiva 98/48/ES z dne 20. julija 1998 spremenila Direktivo 98/34/ES.
The Agreement between the Member States of EFTA and the EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalregulationsentered into force in November 1990.
Sporazum med dr™avami ｲlanicami Efte in EGS o postopku zbiranja informacij v zvezi s tehniｲnimi predpisi je zaｲel veljati novembra 1990.
The Agreement on the European Economic Area, applicable since 1 January 1994, subsequently incorporated Directive 83/189/EEC with the necessary adaptations.
Sporazum o Evrop-skem gospodarskem prostoru, ki velja od 1. januarja 1994, je naknadno vkljuｲil Direktivo 83/189/EGS s potrebnimi prilagoditvami.
Switzerland, though not a signatory to this Agreement, continues to apply the procedure for the exchange of in-formation.
Þvica, ｲetudi ni podpisnica tega sporazuma, nadaljuje z uporabo postopka za izmenjavo informacij.
Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (OJ C Vol.
Sporazum o pridru™itvi med Evropsko gospodarsko skupnostjo in Turｲijo (UL C, vol. 16, þt.
16 No C 113, 24.12.1973) and Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the «nalphaseofthecustomsunion(OJL35,13.2.1996,p.1).
C 113, 24.12.1973, English version) in Sklep 1/95 Pridru™itvenega sveta ES-Turｲija z dne 22. decembra 1995 o izvajanju zadnje faze carinske unije (UL L 39, 13.12.1996, str. 1).
tions, i.e. of all `measures which prohibit, impede or render less attractive the exercise of such freedoms' (freedom of establish-ment and freedom to provide services).
Z razþiritvijo obsega uporabe informacijskega postopka na predpise o storitvah informacijske dru™be Direktiva 98/34/ES od avgusta 1999 zagotavlja prepreｲevanje novih ovir svobodi ustanavljanja in prostega pretoka storitev informacijske dru™-be, s tem da zagotavlja mehanizem za analiziranje zdru™ljivosti nove nacionalne zakonodaje na tem podroｲju s ｲlenoma 43 in 49 Pogodbe ES.
the Community- extended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area to products from EFTA countries signatory to the Agreement - is mutual recognition of the regulations relat-ing to the design, manufacture and testing of products, and the conformity assessment procedures used; the Member States and the Commission are informed about these regula-tions through the procedure for the provision of information established by Directive 98/34/EC.
Zato je bil pri pregledovanju osnutkov nacionalnih predpisov na podroｲju storitev informacijske dru™be najpomembnejþi cilj na podlagi sodne prakse Sodiþｲa na primer nasprotovanje vsa-kemu nacionalnemu regulativnemu prijemu za uporabo okvir-ne eksteritorialne zakonite ureditve, ki ne dela razlik med sub-jekti s sede™em v dr™avi ｲlanici priglasiteljici in tistimi, ki ™elijo opravljati storitve v taki dr™avi ｲlanici, ne da bi tam imeli sede™.
To be admissible as an exception to the fundamental freedoms of the internal market in a non-harmonised area, a national re-striction must, on the basis of this case law comply with the prin-ciples of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
Plena 43 in 49 Pogodbe skladno s sodno prakso Sodiþｲa Evrop-skih skupnosti zahtevata odpravo omejitev, tj. vseh ¶ukrepov, ki prepovedujejo, ovirajo uresniｲevanje takih svoboþｲin oziroma ga delajo manj privlaｲnegaƒ (svoboda ustanavljanja in svoboda opravljanja storitev).
As regards freedom to provide services, in particular, this means that national regulations which make no allowance for require-ments already met by an operator in his Member State of es-tablishment, from which he o.ershisservices will prove to be a disproportionate restriction and therefore inadmissible un-der Community law where the service in question is provided, as in the case of Information Society services, without the pro-vider having to enter the territory of the Member State in which the service is received.
Da bi bila nacionalna omejitev kot izjema temeljnih svoboþｲin notranjega trga na neusklajenem podroｲju sprejemljiva, mora biti na podlagi te sodne prakse usklajena z naｲeli nediskrimina-cije, nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
Furthermore, the provisions of Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the « n a l p h a s e o ft h e C uffs t o m s U n i o n , which provides for the elimination of quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent e . e c t b e t w e e n t h e E U a n d Tffu r k e y , a r e i n t e r p r e t e d f o r the purposes of their implementation and application to products covered by the Customs Union, in conformity with the relevant decisions of the European Court of Justice con-cerning provisions of the EC Treaty, in particular Articles 28 to 30 thereof.
Da bi bila Direktiva v celoti uｲinkovita, morajo vsi igralci, tj. na-cionalni organi oblasti, organi za standardizacijo in gospodar-ski subjekti Evropske unije, temeljito razumeti njene doloｲbe in se morajo natanｲno zavedati svojih pravic in obveznosti. To je þe toliko pomembnejþe, odkar je Sodiþｲe v aprilu 1996 uvedlo naｲelo, da neupoþtevanje obveznosti priglaþanja povzroｲi neuporabnost zadevnih tehniｲnih predpisov, tako da niso izvrþljivi zoper posameznike.
Directive 98/34/EC, by extending the scope of application of the information procedure to rules on Information Society services, ensured, since August 1999, the prevention of new barriers to the freedom of establishment and the free move-ment of Information Society services by providing a mecha-nism to analyse the compatibility of new national legislation in this « e l d w i t h A r t i c l e s 4 3 a n d 4 9 o ft h e E C T r e a t y .
Cilj te knji™ice je seznaniti vse udele™ence, zlasti evropske izde-lovalce in ponudnike storitev informacijske dru™be, o ciljih, vse-bini in obsegu bistvenega instrumenta zakonodaje Skupnosti za odpravo pri viru tehniｲnih ovir za prosti pretok blaga, svobo-do ustanavljanja in svobodo opravljanja storitev informacijske dru™be na notranjem trgu.
According to the case-law of the European Court of Justice, Ar-ticles 43 and 49 of the Treaty require the elimination of restric-
Þe zlasti za svobodo opravljanja storitev to pomeni, da se bodo nacionalni predpisi, neupoþtevajoｲi pogoje, ki jih je ™e izpolnil subjekt v svoji dr™avi ｲlanici sede™a, iz katere ponuja svoje sto-ritve, izkazali za nesorazmerno omejitev in zatorej nedopust-ne v okviru zakonodaje Skupnosti, kjer se opravlja zadevna sto-ritev, pa tudi storitve informacijske dru™be, ne da bi ponudnik storitev moral stopiti na ozemlje dr™ave ｲlanice, kjer je sprejeta storitev.
The Commission has also made sure that planned national rules do not impose needless or exces-
Zadeva C-439/99 Komisija proti Italiji › ¶Trgovinski sejmiƒ [2002] Recueil, str. I-305.
Chapter I: The scope of the Directive tional regulations and standards involving barriers to in-tra-Community trade had not been monitored by the Commission and the Member States because certain products were not covered.
Da bi pojasnili þiroko opredelitev, ki se zdaj uporablja, je po-membno poudariti, da je Sodiþｲe v okvir doloｲb v zvezi s pro-stim pretokom blaga skladno z 28. ｲlenom Pogodbe vkljuｲilo ¶proizvode, ki se lahko ovrednotijo v denarnem smislu in so kot taki lahko predmet trgovinskih poslovƒ.
Article 1 d e « n e s t h e mffe a n i n g g i v e n b y t h e D i r e c t i v e t o a n u mb e r of key terms, used throughout its provisions.
V tem okviru je So-diþｲe odloｲilo, da se odpadki, bodisi tisti, ki se lahko reciklirajo ali ne, ne þtejejo za proizvod, katerega pretok naj se naｲelno ne bi prepreｲeval.
This ter-minological and semantic clari«cationisessentialtoane.ec-tive understanding of the text and simultaneously de«nesthescope of the Directive.
Primerno je, da se to upoþteva pri doloｲitvi obsega Direktive.
It is appropriate to take this into consideration in determining the scope of the Directive.
(2) ¶storitevƒ, katera koli storitev informacijske dru™be ali katera koli storitev, ki se ponavadi opravi odplaｲno, na daljavo, elektron-sko in na zahtevo prejemnika storitev20;
For the purposes of this Directive, the following meanings shall apply:
V tej Direktivi naslednji izrazi pomenijo:
2) `service', any Information Society service, that is to say, any service normally provided for remuneration, at a distance, by elec-tronic means and at the individual request of a recipient of services.
(1) ¶proizvodƒ je kateri koli industrijsko izdelan proizvod in kateri koli kmetijski proizvod, vkljuｲno z ribjimi proizvodi;
For the purposes of this de«nition:
› ¶na daljavoƒ pomeni, da se storitev opravi, ne da bi bile stranke soｲasno navzoｲe,
› `at a distance' means that the service is provided without the parties being simultaneously present,
› ¶elektronskoƒ pomeni, da se storitev poþlje na zaｲetnem kraju in sprejme na cilju z elektronsko opremo za predelavo (skupaj z digitalnim zgoþｲevanjem) in shranjevanje podatkov ter se v ce-loti prenaþa, poþilja in sprejema po ™ici, radijsko, z optiｲnimi ali drugimi elektromagnetnimi sredstvi,