natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Yet, despite these warning signs, decisions oncatch levels remain dominated by shortterm thinking,and thecatching capacity of the European fleet remains more thantwice what is needed to harvest our own fish stocks sustainably.
Kljub tem opozorilnim znakom pa v odločanju o ravneh ulova še naprej prevladuje kratkoročno razmišljanje, ribolovna zmogljivost evropske flote pa ostaja več kot dvakrat večja, kot je potrebno za trajnostno izkoriščanje naših staležev rib.
We also need to be aware of thenew obligations which come with it, and which will impact onour fisheries sector.
Poleg tega se moramo zavedati novih obveznosti, ki spremljajo ta pristop in bodo vplivale na naš ribiški sektor.
I believe that fisheries have a positive roleto play in realising the goals of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, which obliges Member States to ensure thegood environmental status of the seas under their jurisdictionby 2021.
Verjamem, da lahko ribištvo odigra pozitivno vlogo pri uresničevanju ciljev okvirne direktive o morski strategiji, ki države članice zavezuje k zagotavljanju dobrega okoljskega stanja morij v njihovi pristojnosti do leta 2021.
And the benefits will not be all one way, either: thehealthier our seas, the more resilient our fish stocks should be,and so the more profitable our fishing industry.
Prav tako koristi ne bodo le enostranske: bolj zdrava ko so naša morja, odpornejši so staleži rib in posledično bo tudi naša ribiška industrija toliko bolj dobičkonosna.
This is bad news for the fish and for marine biodiversity.
To so slabe novice za ribe in morsko biotsko raznovrstnost.
It isalso bad news for fishers, and for all the associated industrieswhich depend upon the wild capture sector.
So tudi slabe novice za ribiče in vso povezano industrijo, ki je odvisna od sektorja prostoživečih vrst.
Shrinking catches,rising costs and the need to travel further and fish longer to catchfewer and often less valuable fish mean that, in some sectors ofthe industry, many boats now operate at, or close to, a loss.
Vse manjši ulov, naraščajoči stroški in potreba po daljšem potovanju in ribarjenju za ulov manjših količin in pogosto manj dragocenih rib pomeni, da v nekaterih industrijskih sektorjih številne ladje zdaj obratujejo z izgubo ali so povsem blizu nje.
Promoting aquaculture is certainly an important alternative,which deserves our full support through appropriate regulatory measures, awareness-building and market measures, aswell as with the help of targeted financial support.
Prihodnja reforma skupne ribiške politike, ki jo zdaj pripravljamo, bo predvsem zahtevala dejavno sodelovanje vseh, na katere bi lahko vplival njen izid.
I welcomethe increasingly important role that aquaculture is playing inthe EU and beyond, but it will be a long time, if ever, until itcould make up the shortfall in supply.
Upravljanje ribištva v Evropi na regionalni in nacionalni ravni ter ravni EU vse bolj usmerjajo znanje in nasveti, ki pridejo „od spodaj navzgor“.
Above all, the forthcoming reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, which we are now preparing, will require the activeparticipation of all those who may be affected by its outcome.Fisheries management in Europe, at regional, national and EU level, is increasingly driven by knowledge and advice generated from the bottom up.
Spodbujanje ribogojstva je nedvomno pomembna nadomestna možnost, ki si zasluži našo polno podporo z ustreznimi regulativnimi ukrepi, ozaveščanjem in tržnimi ukrepi ter usmerjeno finančno podporo.
The review process we havelaunched will likewise require not only extensive consultationwith stakeholders, but also broadbased public support, if itis to produce a fisheries management framework which iscapable of putting the common good before narrower nationaland/or sectoral interests.
Pozdravljam vse pomembnejšo vlogo, ki jo ima ribogojstvo v EU in zunaj nje, vendar bo minilo precej časa, preden bo nadoknadilo zmanjšanje oskrbe, če se bo to sploh zgodilo.
In view of the poor situation of many fish stocks it is bothjustified and understandable that many people are callingfor a decisive change in the way fisheries are managed, bothat Member State and at European level.
Glede na slabo stanje številnih staležev rib je upravičeno in razumljivo, da številni zahtevajo odločilno spremembo upravljanja ribištva na ravni držav članic in evropski ravni.
Against this background, I hope that this brochure will servea double purpose.
Na podlagi navedenega upam, da bo ta brošura služila dvojnemu namenu.
On the one hand, it spells out and explainswhere we are today on the road to sustainable fisheries in Europe, and how the management framework of the Common Fisheries Policy functions at present.
Po eni strani določa in pojasnjuje, kje smo trenutno na poti k trajnostnemu ribištvu v Evropi in kako zdaj deluje okvir za upravljanje skupne ribiške politike.
But on the other hand, italso presents an open and frank account of the problems westill face, and the distance that still remains to be travelled.
Po drugi strani pa zagotavlja tudi odprto in pošteno poročanje o težavah, s katerimi se še vedno spopadamo, in razdalji, ki jo moramo še prehoditi.
I would warmly invite you to join us in defining the path thatwe will take in the future.
Iskreno vas vabim, da se nam pridružite pri določanju poti, po kateri bomo stopali v prihodnosti.
For whether you work in the sector,campaign for its reform, or simply eat the wonderful andnourishing produce which it provides – your contribution andsupport will be vital in defining the future of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Ne glede na to, ali ste zaposleni v tem sektorju, promovirate njegovo reformo ali preprosto uživate čudovit in hranljiv pridelek, ki ga zagotavlja, bosta vaš prispevek in podpora bistvena pri opredeljevanju prihodnosti skupne ribiške politike.
In 2008 the European Commission announced its intentionto launch a new root-and-branch review of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Evropska komisija je leta 2008 sporočila, da namerava korenito revidirati skupno ribiško politiko.
The Green Paper, which is currently beingprepared for publication later in 2009, will trigger a radicaland wide-ranging debate with our stakeholders and citizenson how Europe’s fisheries can best be managed to ensurethe maximum return to society over the long run.
Zelena knjiga, ki se trenutno pripravlja za izdajo konec leta 2009, bo sprožila radikalno in obsežno razpravo z zainteresiranimi stranmi in državljani o tem, kako je mogoče najbolje upravljati evropsko ribištvo za zagotavljanje dolgoročno najboljšega donosa družbi.
The 2002reform gave the Common Fisheries Policy a new fundamentalorientation towards sustainability, but it did not foresee andpre-empt all the obstacles that lay in the way of achieving thisgoal, both at the economic and the institutional level.
Reforma iz leta 2002 je skupni ribiški politiki zagotovila novo osnovno usmerjenost k trajnosti, ni pa predvidela in preprečila vseh ovir, ki ležijo na poti do tega cilja na gospodarski in institucionalni ravni.
If wewant to remove these obstacles, and create the conditions fora genuinely viable and sustainable EU fishing industry, thenwe need to be prepared to question every aspect of the way thecurrent system operates.
Če želimo odpraviti te ovire in ustvariti razmere za resnično trajnostno ribiško industrijo EU, ki ji bo uspelo preživeti, moramo biti pripravljeni dvomiti o vsakem vidiku načina delovanja sedanjega sistema.
Joe Borg European Commissioner for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
Joe Borg Evropski komisar za pomorske zadeve in ribištvo
We will also have to recognise that the fishing industry can nolonger be viewed in isolation from the wider maritimeseascape, in which it is one actor among many.
Poleg tega bo treba priznati, da ribiške industrije ni več mogoče obravnavati ločeno od širšega morskega prostora, v katerem je eden izmed številnih dejavnikov.
The next reformof the Common Fisheries Policy must set it in the context of the EU’s Integrated Maritime Policy, with its focus on sustainablegrowth in coastal regions.
Naslednja reforma skupne ribiške politike mora to umestiti v okvir celostne pomorske politike EU, ki namenja glavno pozornost trajnostni rasti v obalnih regijah.
There are many positivefeedback
Vendar moramo biti pripravljeni na vse možnosti, ko se začnemo ukvarjati s tem bolj združenim pristopom k oblikovanju politike.
How we manage our fisheries
Kako upravljamo svoje ribištvo
The Common Fisheries Policy was formallycreated in 1983, but its origins date back
Skupna ribiška politika je bila uradno oblikovana leta 1983, vendar njeni začetki
1 suggests, to prevent repeated argumentsover how quotas should be allocated, andto provide fishers with an environmentwhich is stable relative to the overall stateof the stock in question.
Kot je razvidno iz izraza, je namen relativne stabilnosti preprečevati ponavljajoča se prerekanja o načinu dodeljevanja kvot in ribičem zagotavljati okolje, ki je stabilno glede na splošno stanje zadevnega staleža.
One of the oldest elements of the CFPis the principle of ‘relative stability’.
Eden izmed najstarejših elementov skupne ribiške politike je načelo „relativne stabilnosti“.
Thequestion of how to divide fishing opportunities up into national quotas wassparked by the setting of the first catchlimits affecting EU fleets by the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC)in 1975.
Ko je Komisija za ribištvo severovzhodnega Atlantika (NEAFC) leta 1975 določila prve omejitve ulova, ki so vplivale na flote EU, se je pojavilo vprašanje, kako ribolovne možnosti razdeliti v nacionalne kvote.
Following the Hague Declarationof 1976, Council defined the system of relative stability in 1980.
Po Haaški deklaraciji iz leta 1976 je Svet leta 1980 opredelil sistem relativne stabilnosti.
The key criteriaused were catches during the referenceperiod (1973-78), preferences for certainfleets in Scotland and Ireland (and Greenland, which was then still a member of the European Community), and compensation for losses in third country waters.
Ključna uporabljena merila so bila ulov v referenčnem obdobju (1973–1978), preferenciali za nekatere flote na Škotskem in Irskem (in Grenlandiji, ki je bila takrat še vedno članica Evropske skupnosti), ter nadomestilo za izgube v vodah tretjih držav.
Relative stability was first applied in practicewith the adoption of the CFP in 1983.
Relativna stabilnost se je v praksi prvič uporabila s sprejetjem SRP leta 1983.
If the nations of the European Union had simply followed thispath without some form of coordination,the consequences could have been bothchaotic and disastrous.
segajo na začetek sedemdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja, ko je bilo ribištvo najprej del skupne kmetijske politike.
Europe’s fisherieswere already highly‘international’, with manyfleets used to fishing a long way from home.To avoid the enormous disruption which thenew EEZ regime could have caused, theemerging European institutions brokeredadeal under which Member States agreedtogrant free mutual access to each otherwaters, so that each nation’s traditional fishinggrounds and practices could be preserved.
Na začetku je bila glavna skrb ministrov preprečevanje konfliktov med državami v obdobju, ko so številne države po svetu širile svoje teritorialne vode, dokler niso nazadnje oblikovale izključnih ekonomskih con, ki se raztezajo dvesto navtičnih milj od temeljne črte države.
Under this system, Total Allowable Catches (TACs) for each fish stock areshared out between the Member States ofthe EU according to a fixed allocation keybased on their historic catches.
Če bi države Evropske unije preprosto sledile tej poti brez vsakršnega usklajevanja, bi bile lahko posledice kaotične in pogubne.
A firststep towards this goal was taken in 2002,when the European Union undertook a majorreform of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Evropsko ribištvo je bilo že tedaj zelo „mednarodno“, številne flote pa so bile vajene ribariti daleč od doma.
And the problems which it soughtto resolve are, if anything, even more relevanttoday. Many of Europe’s fleets continue tofish far from home, yet within EU waters.As aresult, if the CFP did not exist, it wouldbe necessary to invent something very muchlike it to deal with the complex, overlappingpatterns of mutual access on which Europe’sfishers depend.
Da bi preprečili nastanek globokega razdora, ki bi ga lahko povzročila nova ureditev izključnih ekonomskih con, so nastajajoče evropske institucije dosegle sporazum, na podlagi katerega so se države članice strinjale, da si vzajemno dodelijo prost dostop do svojih vod, tako da bi se lahko ohranili tradicionalna ribolovna območja in prakse vseh držav.
Is this asking too much? In many ways, ourefforts to ensure that the interests of fishers arealigned with those of the fish are hampered bythe fact that the tools at our disposal weredevised in a very different context.
Na podlagi tega sistema se celotni dovoljeni ulovi (TAC) za vsak stalež rib porazdelijo med države članice EU v skladu s fiksnim ključem za dodelitev na podlagi njihovega zgodovinskega ulova.
The industry has changed, too. The amountof capital deployed throughout the sectorhas multiplied many times, while technological advances have radically increased thepower of fishers to catch and market fish.
Kot vsak poskus upravljanja zapletenega stanja, ki vključuje več dejavnikov, s formulo, ki je sorazmerno preprosta ter jo je lahko razumeti in uporabljati, ima tudi načelo relativne stabilnosti slabosti in prednosti.
The success of the policy can be measured bythe fact that, a quarter of a century later, wetake it for granted that fisheries disputesbetween Member States are settled by negotiation, not by war.
Na splošno se šteje, da spodbuja kratkoročno sprejemanje odločitev in osredotočenost na nacionalni delež na račun skupnih dolgoročnih interesov, nekateri kritiki pa gredo celo tako daleč, da ga razglašajo za neskladnega z zavezo EU k enotnemu trgu.
Instead our focus is onthe alarming decline of stocks in Europeanwaters, which is dragging the capture sectordown with it. Clearly something needs to bedone to reverse this trend: more than everbefore, we need a European fishing industrythat is both sustainable and profitable.
Kljub temu so ministri za ribištvo EU stalno podpirali načelo relativne stabilnosti kot podlago za dodeljevanje kvot na podlagi skupne ribiške politike, ključ za dodelitev pa se je skozi leta prilagajal za upoštevanje pravic novih držav članic.
The 2002 reform process diagnosed a number of specific problems. The European fleethad grown far too large for the dwindlingfish stocks in our oceans, which it was capable of catching many times over.
ribiške politike in obenem zagotavlja nova orodja, ki bodo očitneje osredotočena na spodbujanje dolgoročne trajnosti evropske ribiške industrije.
And what regulations andrules there were were often not respected –in some cases, because they were too difficult to enforce, in others, simply because thewill and means to enforce them were notthere.
Prvi korak k temu cilju je bil narejen leta 2002, ko se je Evropska unija lotila pomembne reforme skupne ribiške politike.
Add in a fleetwhich has the capacity to catch far in excess ofthe sustainable yield of our seas, and controlsystems in which the penalties for ignoringthe rules are often so small they can be treatedas ‘normal’ operating costs, and you havearecipe for overfishing.
Skupna ribiška politika se je tako začela izvajati ne kot radikalen poskus nadnacionalne regulacije, temveč kot poskus ohranjanja raznovrstnosti, ki je bila značilna za tradicionalno strukturo evropske industrije.
Of course, this is not a new problem.
In težave, ki jih je poskušala odpraviti, so danes celo hujše.
Sustainable fisheries are now firmly at the top ofthe international fisheries agenda – includingin the EU.
Številne evropske flote še naprej ribarijo daleč od doma, čeprav v vodah EU.
As a result, the annual EU regulations setting Total Allowable Catches (TACs)and quotas for the most important commercial species are no longer simply a mechanismfor dividing up a common resource. Theyare also called on to provide a comprehensive system of rules for the protection andpreservation of vulnerable fish populations.
Zato bi bilo treba v primeru, če skupna ribiška politika ne bi obstajala, izumiti nekaj zelo podobnega za obravnavo zapletenih in prekrivajočih se vzorcev vzajemnega dostopa, od katerega so odvisni evropski ribiči.
But if we are really goingto tackle the drivers which have brought ourfish stocks to such poor condition, andundermined the profitability of the sector,then we will need to look at every aspect ofthe policy, and be prepared to question allour assumptions.
V številnih pogledih naša prizadevanja za zagotavljanje, da so interesi ribičev usklajeni z interesi rib, ovira dejstvo, da so bila orodja, ki jih imamo na razpolago, zasnovana v zelo drugačnem okviru.
The main aim of this brochure is to provideasnapshot of how European fisheries policyworked at the beginning of the year 2009.But it also seeks to point out some of theunresolved problems and contradictionswhich will need to be addressed by anyfuture reform of the CFP.
Zasnovana so bila za razdelitev vira, za katerega se je predpostavljalo, da je zanesljiv in izdaten, ne pa za upravljanje zapletenih in nepredvidljivih bioloških sistemov ob pomanjkanju in krizi.
Manyimportant stocks are now under long-termmanagement plans.
Spremenila se je tudi industrija.
Some fisheries haveseen significant improvements in control andenforcement, and some Member States havesubstantially resized their fleets to bringthem more into line with the current condition of the resource.
Obseg kapitala, ki se uporablja v celotnem sektorju, se je nekajkrat povečal, tehnološki napredek pa je korenito povečal zmogljivosti ribičev za ulov in trženje rib.
Nevertheless, EU fisheries continue to becharacterized by shortterm decision-makingand short-sighted behaviour.
Uspeh te politike je mogoče meriti z dejstvom, da se nam četrt stoletja pozneje zdi samoumevno, da se ribiški spori med državami članicami rešujejo s pogajanji in ne z vojno.
According to this text, agreed by the Fisheries Ministers of the 15 nations who werethen members of the EU, the aim of the CFPis to promote:
Namesto tega je naša glavna pozornost namenjena alarmantnemu upadu staležev v evropskih vodah, kar za seboj potegne sektor ulova.
Sustainable fisheries and aquaculturein a Healthy marine environmentwhich cansupport an Economically viable industryprovidingemployment and opportunities forcoastal communities.
Jasno je, da je treba ukrepati in obrniti to težnjo: bolj kot kdaj prej potrebujemo evropsko ribiško industrijo, ki je trajnostna in dobičkonosna.
Group 1: Access to fisheries resourcesand management of fishing activities Group 2: Aquaculture: fish, shellfish and molluscs Group 3: Markets and Trade Policy Group 4: General questions: economicsand sector analysis.
Preveč upravljavskih odločitev na ravni EU in nacionalni ravni je bilo kratkoročnih ukrepov, ki so bili pogosto sprejeti pod politično prisilo in brez podpore katere koli skladne dolgoročne strategije.
Today,the Committee’s 21 members are drawnfrom organisations representing not onlythe production sector, the processingindustry and trade in fishery and aquaculture products, but also the interests ofconsumers, the environment and development.
Tistih nekaj veljavnih uredb in pravil pa se pogosto ni upoštevalo, v nekaterih primerih zato, ker jih je bilo pretežko izvajati, v drugih pa preprosto zato, ker ni bilo ne volje ne sredstev za izvajanje.
Members are appointed by the Commission on proposal from the mainrepresentative organisations at Europeanlevel.
V središču vseh teh neuspehov je bilo pomanjkanje zaupanja med zainteresiranimi stranmi in regulativnimi organi, za katerega se je zdelo, da je zasenčilo celo uspehe tistih delov skupne ribiške politike, ki so očitno delovali.
Alongsidethe RACs, ACFA remains a crucial toolthrough which the Commission canengage in dialogue with the sector andunderstand stakeholders’ points of view.
Reforma iz leta 2002 je obravnavala ta vprašanja na štiri glavne načine:
Fisheries managers need totake full advantage of the expertise andexperience which only stakeholders canbring.
Rezultat je sistem, v katerem so spodbude v mnogo pogledih obrnjene v napačno smer.
ACFA works through the Committeeitself, together with four working groupsmade up of experts which prepare the Committee’s opinions.
Sistem, v katerem lahko operaterji pogosto pridobijo prednost s prikrivanjem informacij organom, namesto da bi jih delili, in v katerem posamični interesi pogosto poteptajo skupno dobro, kadar koli sta zadevni kategoriji v konfliktu.
The working groupsalso send representatives to attend ACFAplenaries, as does the Sectoral Dialogue Committee, which brings together thesocial partners.
Če k temu dodamo še floto z ribolovno zmogljivostjo, ki krepko presega trajnostni donos naših morij, in nadzorne sisteme, v katerih so kazni za neupoštevanje pravil pogosto tako nizke, da jih je mogoče obravnavati kot „običajne“ stroške poslovanja, dobimo recept za prelov.
Andtheir regional structure, which prefiguresrecent developments in both the CFP (technical measures – see chapter 7) and environmental policy (Marine Strategy Directive –see chapter 15 and the fact sheet on theecosystem approach), may provide one clue asto how Europe’s fisheries could be managedmore effectively in the future.
Jasno je, da je potreben nov pristop, ki lahko ohrani najboljše dosedanje dosežke skupne spodbujala je večjo vključenost zainteresiranih strani v vseh vidikih razvoja politike, prek obstoječih kanalov
Today, the RACs provide fisheries managersfrom the Member States with an insight intoissues which may affect their fleets, butwhich also go far beyond their national borders.
V zadnjem desetletju se je okrepila ozaveščenost o resni grožnji za staleže rib ne samo v evropskih vodah, temveč po vsem svetu.
They act as a forum in which fishers canstart to work more closely with scientists, andovercome the barriers of mistrust which existbetween them.
Trajnostno ribištvo je zdaj trdno na vrhu mednarodnega dnevnega reda o ribištvu, tudi v EU.
And perhaps most importantly, they provide a real opportunity forstakeholders from different sectors and different countries to meet regularly to argueout their differences and discuss their com-moninterests and problems.
Zato letni predpisi EU, ki določajo celotne dovoljene ulove in kvote za najpomembnejše komercialne vrste, niso več le mehanizem za razdelitev skupnega vira.
For the future ofthe European fishing industry depends upon
Potrebni so tudi za zagotavljanje celovitega sistema pravil za varstvo in ohranjanje ranljivih ribjih populacij.
Taking thelead on control position on how this major problem couldbe resolved.
2009 začela izvajati pomembna posvetovanja o prihodnosti SRP.
The RACs are ‘advisory’ bodies, but theyare far from purely reactive.
Komisija ima zakonsko obveznost pregledati ohranjevanje in elemente flote SRP do leta 2012.
Indeed, theyprovide a tool through which stakeholderscan help to set the agenda under the CFP.In addition to participating in consultations launched by the Commission andresponding to EU and national policy proposals, RACs may also act on their owninitiative to propose solutions to problemswhich they feel need to be addressed.
Če pa se hočemo dejansko začeti ukvarjati z gonilnimi silami, ki so povzročile tako slabo stanje staležev naših rib in oslabile dobičkonosnost sektorja, bomo morali obravnavati vsak vidik politike in biti pripravljeni dvomiti o vseh naših predpostavkah.
This is tangible proof of the powerof the RACs to replace conflict and mistrustwith dialogue that leads to the identifica-tionof common interests.
Glavni cilj te brošure je ponuditi kratek prikaz delovanja evropske ribiške politike na začetku leta 2009.
It also augurswell for the future of fisheries in what isone of Europe’s most fragile ecosystems.While it is too early to judge the fullimpact of this initiative, recent events suggest that illegal landings in the Baltic havesince declined significantly.
Poleg tega si prizadeva izpostaviti nekatere nerešene težave in protislovja, ki jih bo morala obravnavati vsaka prihodnja reforma SRP.