natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to Article 32 of the EW 1989, which provided for the possibility of concluding agreements with them, special large consumers contributed only partially or not at all to the non-market-compatible costs.
Posebni veliki potro�niki so k s trgom nezdružljivim stro�kom prispevali le delno ali nič zaradi člena 32 EW 1989, ki je določal, da je z njimi mogoče skleniti sporazume.
The Directive was transposed in the Netherlands by the Law on the regulation of the generation, transmission and sale of electricity (Elektriciteitswet) of 2 July 1998 (Staatsblad 1998, No 427) (‘the EW 1998’), which repealed the EW 1989 with effect from 1 July 1999.
Na Nizozemskem je bila Direktiva prenesena z zakonom o ureditvi proizvodnje, prenosa in dobave električne energije (Elektriciteitswet) z dne 2. julija 1998 (Staatsblad 1998, �t. 427, v nadaljevanju: EW 1998), s katerim je bil EW 1989 razveljavljen z učinkom od 1. julija 1999.
Under that law, the operating activities in respect of the distribution network and the distribution of electricity were unbundled.
S tem zakonom so bile dejavnosti upravljanja distribucijskega omrežja ločene od dejavnosti distribucije električne energije.
The protocol agreement was given a legal basis by the new Article 97(2) of the EW 1998 (added by the Law of 1 July 1999, Staatsblad 1999, No 260), under which the protocol was to be observed until 1 January 2001.
Protokol k sporazumu je bil uzakonjen z novim členom 97(2) EW 1998 (dodanim z zakonom z dne 1. julija 1999, Staatsblad 1999, �t. 260), s katerim je bilo naloženo spo�tovanje tega protokola do 1. januarja 2001.
Under the Law, a committee of three experts presided over by Mr Herkströter (‘the Herkströter Committee’) was entrusted with giving an opinion on the need for compensatory measures in respect of the non-market-compatible costs.
V skladu z zakonom je bil odbor treh strokovnjakov pod predsedstvom C. Herkströterja (v nadaljevanju: Herkströterjev odbor) zadolžen za pripravo mnenja o potrebnosti izravnalnih ukrepov za s trgom nezdružljive stro�ke.
That committee submitted its opinion to the Minister for Economic Affairs on 18 November 1999.
Ta odbor je 18. novembra 1999 ministru za gospodarske zadeve poslal mnenje.
It concluded that the government should grant compensation only in respect of the non-market-compatible costs for which it was itself responsible, namely those for the urban heating projects and the Demkolec plant.
Predlagal je, da bi morala vlada podeliti nadomestila samo za s trgom nezdružljive stro�ke, ki jih je sama povzročila, to je za projekte daljinskega ogrevanja in napravo Demkolec.
The other non-market-compatible costs and, in particular, those relating to the import contracts, were to be borne by the generating undertakings, in accordance with a formula suggested by the Herkströter Committee.
Druge s trgom nezdružljive stro�ke in zlasti stro�ke v zvezi s pogodbami o uvozu pa bi morala nositi proizvodna podjetja po delitvenem ključu, ki ga predlaga Herkströterjev odbor.
On 21 December 2000, the Transitional Law on the electricity generating sector (Overgangswet Elektriciteitsproductiesector, Staatsblad 2000, No 607) (‘the OEPS’), which governed, inter alia, the issue of the non-market-compatible costs, was adopted.
21. decembra 2000 je bil sprejet prehodni zakon o sektorju proizvodnje električne energije (Overgangswet Elektriciteits-productiesector, Staatsblad 2000, �t. 607, v nadaljevanju: OEPS), ki je med drugim urejal vpra�anje s trgom nezdružljivih stro�kov.
Both the Explanatory Memorandum for that law and the first recital in the preamble thereto describe the protocol agreement as having lapsed on account of the liberalisation of electricity generation.
V obrazložitvi tega zakona in v njegovi prvi uvodni izjavi se omenja potek veljavnosti protokola k sporazumu zaradi liberalizacije proizvodnje električne energije.
It is apparent in that regard, from the explanations submitted before the Court that, although the protocol agreement expired only on 1 January 2001, it could no longer be implemented as initially envisaged, in particular in respect of the year 2000, on account of the new rules applicable to special large consumers.
Glede tega iz pojasnil, ki so bila predložena Sodi�ču, izhaja, da čeprav je bilo določeno, da protokol k sporazumu preneha veljati �ele 1. januarja 2001, njegovo prvotno določeno izvr�evanje ni bilo več mogoče, zlasti v letu 2000, in sicer zaradi novih pravil, ki so veljala za posebne velike potro�nike.
Article 9 of the OEPS, which entered into force on 29 December 2000 and applied with retroactive effect to 1 August 2000, as provided for in Article 25 of that Law, set out a mechanism for the financing of the non-market-compatible costs for 2000.
S členom 9 OEPS, ki je začel veljati 29. decembra 2000 in se je uporabljal za nazaj od 1. avgusta 2000, je bil vzpostavljen, kot določa člen 25 tega zakona, mehanizem za financiranje s trgom nezdružljivih stro�kov iz leta 2000.
It is worded as follows:
Ta člen določa:
Every customer, not being a protected customer, shall, in addition to what he contractually owes to the net operator for the area in which he is established, pay to that net operator an amount of NLG 0.0117 per kWh, calculated on the basis of the total amount of electricity which the net operator distributed to the customer’s connection over the period from 1 August 2000 to 31 December 2000.
Vsak odjemalec, ki ni za�čiten, je upravljavcu omrežja na območju, na katerem ima sedež, poleg zneska na podlagi sporazuma dolžan plačati tudi znesek 0,0117 NLG za kilovatno uro, izračunan na podlagi skupne količine električne energije, ki jo je upravljavec omrežja prenesel svojim uporabnikom v obdobju od 1. avgusta 2000 do 31. decembra 2000.
Every protected customer shall, in addition to what he contractually owes to the licence holder for the area in which he is established, pay to that licence holder an amount of NLG 0.0117 per kWh, calculated on the basis of the total amount of electricity which that licence holder supplied to the customer over the period from 1 August 2000 to 31 December 2000.
Vsak za�čiten odjemalec je imetniku dovoljenja na območju, na katerem ima sedež, poleg zneska na podlagi sporazuma dolžan plačati tudi znesek 0,0117 NLG za kilovatno uro, izračunan na podlagi skupne količine elektrike, ki mu jo je imetnik dovoljenja dobavil v obdobju od 1. avgusta 2000 do 31. decembra 2000.
If a customer has already paid to a net operator or licence holder over the course of 2000 or part thereof an advance in order to meet the amount referred to in the first or second paragraphs, the net operator or licence holder shall set off that advance against the total amount due in the final accounts for 2000.
Če je odjemalec upravljavcu omrežja ali imetniku dovoljenja že plačal predplačilo za leto 2000 ali del tega leta, za izvr�itev plačila zneska iz odstavka 1 ali 2, ta upravljavec omrežja ali ta imetnik dovoljenja v končnem obračunu za leto 2000 to predplačilo odbije od skupnega zneska, ki mu je dolgovan.
The proceeds from the amounts payable by customers pursuant to the first or second paragraphs shall be paid by the net operators or licence holders, before 1 July 2001, to the designated company.
Upravljavec omrežja ali imetnik dovoljenja prenese zneske, ki jih dolgujejo odjemalci na podlagi odstavkov 1 in 2, na z zakonom določeno družbo pred 1. julijem 2001.
The designated company shall inform the Minister of the amount of the proceeds referred to in the fourth paragraph, and shall include therewith a declaration by an auditor, as defined in Article 393, first paragraph, of Book 2 of the Civil Code, concerning the veracity of the statement.
Z zakonom določena družba obvesti ministra o skupni vsoti zneskov iz odstavka 4 in priloži izjavo računovodje v smislu člena 393(1) knjige 2 civilnega zakonika, ki potrjuje verodostojnost podatkov.
If the total of the proceeds amounts to more than NLG 400 000 000, the designated company shall pay the excess to the Minister, who shall set that amount aside for the purpose of defraying the costs referred to in Article 7.’
Če skupni znesek presega 400 milijonov NLG, z zakonom določena družba presežek prenese na ministrstvo, ki ga nameni za financiranje stro�kov iz člena 7.“
The protocol agreement expired on 1 January 2001.
Protokolu k sporazumu je potekla v eljavnost 1. januarja 2001.
Under Article 2(1) of the OEPS, the four generating undertakings became jointly liable for the non-market-compat-ible costs listed in Article 2(2) of the OEPS.
V skladu s členom 2(1) OEPS so �tiri proizvodna podjetja postala skupaj odgovorna za s trgom nezdružljive stro�ke, na�tete v členu 2(2) OEPS.
Articles 6 to 8 of the OEPS related to the financing by the State of the payment of the non-market-compatible costs relating to the urban heating projects and the Demkolec plant for the period after 1 January 2001.
Členi od 6 do 8 OEPS so se nana�ali na državno financiranje plačila s trgom nezdružljivih stro�kov v zvezi s projekti daljinskega ogrevanja in napravo Demkolec za obdobje po 1. januarju 2001.
They were worded as follows:
Ti členi so določali:
Every year, for a maximum period of 10 years, the Minister shall set a surcharge which shall be paid by every customer except net operators.
Minister vsako leto, vendar največ deset let, določi doplačilo, ki ga morajo plačati vsi odjemalci, razen upravljavci omrežij.
The amount of the surcharge shall be determined for the first time within a period of four weeks from the date of entry into force of this article.
Doplačilo se prvič določi v roku �tirih tednov od začetka veljavnosti tega člena.
The surcharge applicable to the nine remaining years shall be set before 1 October of the year preceding that to which the new tariff relates.
Doplačilo za devet naslednjih let se določi do 1. oktobra pred letom, na katerega se nana�a nova cena.
The surcharge shall be expressed as a percentage of the total amount owed by a customer for the transmission of electricity to his place of connection and for the provision of services provided by the system.
Doplačilo izraža odstotek skupnega zneska, ki ga mora plačati odjemalec za prenos električne energije do svojega kraja priključka in za storitve sistema.
The surcharge may not be greater than 10% of the amount referred to in paragraph 3 above.
Doplačilo ne sme presegati 10 odstotkov zneska iz odstavka 3 zgoraj.
The Minister shall set that surcharge in a manner consistent with the provisions adopted by a Ministerial Order which shall provide, in each case, that no subsidy shall be granted to finance costs in respect of which a sum has been allocated in the form of a grant or by virtue of a tax provision.
Minister določi ta znesek v skladu z določbami ministrske uredbe, s katero se v vsakem posameznem primeru določi, da se za financiranje stro�kov, za katere je bil dodeljen znesek v obliki podpore ali pravila davčne narave, ne podeli nobena subvencija.
If it proves to be necessary in order to comply with the interpretation suggested by the Commission …, the Minister may amend the basis referred to in the third paragraph, in accordance with which the surcharge in question is payable.
Če bi bilo to zaradi uskladitve z razlago Komisije […] potrebno, lahko minister spremeni podlago iz tretjega odstavka, na podlagi katere je treba plačati zadevno doplačilo.
The income from the surcharge shall serve to subsidise: a. the costs arising under the agreements relating to urban heating concluded between the generating undertakings and suppliers prior to the date when the [EW] 1989 was repealed, in so far as the projects to which those agreements relate had already been undertaken before that date.
Doplačilo se uporablja za subvencioniranje: a) stro�kov, ki so nastali na podlagi sporazumov v zvezi z daljinskim ogrevanjem, ki so jih sklenila proizvodna podjetja in dobavitelji pred razveljavitvijo [EW] 1989, če se je izvedba projektov, na katere se navedeni sporazumi nana�ajo, že začela pred tem datumom; b) stro�kov v zvezi z odstopom in prenosom delnic družbe n.v.
Demkolec or of the Demkolec experimental coal gas plant, and c. the costs connected with the collection of that surcharge by the network operators.
Demkolec ali poskusne naprave za uplinjanje premoga Demkolec, in c) stro�kov, ki jih imajo s pobiranjem tega doplačila upravljavci omrežij.
In accordance with the provisions to be made by the Minister, the subsidy referred to in Article 7 above shall be granted to the following persons: a. legal persons who defray the costs referred to in Article 7(a), it being declared that each legal person shall receive each year that amount which represents the costs incurred in the year in question.
V skladu z določbami, ki jih sprejme minister, prejmejo subvencije iz člena 7 zgoraj te osebe: a) pravne osebe, ki krijejo stro�ke iz člena 7(a), stro�ke, za katere prejme vsaka pravna oseba vsako leto ta znesek, ki je v skladu s stro�ki, nastalimi v zadevnem letu.
Those costs shall be calculated by using the price of fuel risk method, which takes account of the generation of heat per project.
Ti stro�ki se izračunajo z uporabo metode tveganj, povezanih s ceno goriva, pri čemer se upo�teva proizvodnja toplote na projekt;
2008 — CASE C-206/06 b. persons who defray the costs referred to in Article 7(b).
2008 – ZADEVA C-206/06 b) osebe ki krijejo stro�ke iz člena 7(b).
The Minister shall grant the subsidy to the legal persons referred to in subparagraph 1(a) only after having carried out with them an estimation of the costs, referred to in Article 7(a), which shall be defrayed by them in the year in question; to that end, the legal persons concerned shall state the total quantity of heat generated, expressed as an annual total.
Minister podeli subvencije pravnim osebam iz odstavka 1(a) �ele potem, ko je z njimi ocenil stro�ke iz člena 7(a), ki jih za zadevno leto krijejo te pravne osebe; v ta namen zadevne pravne osebe prijavijo skupno količino proizvedene toplote na letni ravni.
The Minister shall grant the subsidy to the legal persons referred to in paragraph 1(b) only after the sale or the transfer by the legal persons concerned of the shares in n.v.
Minister podeli subvencije pravnim osebam iz odstavka 1(b) �ele potem, ko zadevne pravne osebe prodajo ali prenesejo delnice družbe n.v.
Demkolec or of the Demkolec experimental coal gas plant and only after having carried out with them an estimation of the costs which they will have to bear in connection with the sale or the transfer of those shares or of the plant.
Demkolec ali poskusno napravo za uplinjanje premoga Demkolec in �ele potem, ko je z njimi ocenil stro�ke, ki jih morajo nositi v zvezi s prodajo ali prenosom navedenih delnic ali naprave.
The Ministerial Order referred to in paragraph 1 of this article shall provide, in each case, that no subsidy shall be granted to finance costs in respect of which a sum has been allocated in the form of a grant or by virtue of a tax provision.
Z ministrsko uredbo iz odstavka 1 tega člena se v vsakem posameznem primeru določi, da se za financiranje stro�kov, za katere je bil dodeljen znesek v obliki podpore ali pravila davčne narave, ne podeli nobena subvencija.
The period referred to at the beginning of Article 7 may, subject to the agreement of the Commission … under Article 88 EC, be extended by Ministerial Order by a period which takes into account the length of time for which the agreements referred to in Article 7(a) will continue to run.’
Če Komisija izda […] soglasje na podlagi člena 88 ES, je mogoče rok, naveden v začetku člena 7, z ministrsko uredbo podalj�ati za obdobje, pri katerem se upo�teva preostali čas veljavnosti sporazumov iz člena 7(a).“
The Royal Decree providing for the entry into force of those articles was, however, never adopted.
Vendar ministrska uredba, v kateri je bil določen začetek veljavnosti teh členov, ni bila nikoli sprejeta.
Article 6 of the OEPS was repealed by the Law of 3 July 2003 (Staatsblad 2003, No 316).
Z zakonom z dne 3. julija 2003 (Staatsblad 2003, �t. 316) je bil člen 6 OEPS razveljavljen.
Articles 7 and 8 were replaced by provisions providing for the grant of subsidies intended to cover the costs of the urban heating projects and the Demkolec plant, in accordance with what had been approved by the Commission in its decision (SG (2001) D/290565) of 25 July 2001 in ‘State aid’ file N 597/1998.
Člena 7 in 8 pa sta bila nadome�čena z določbami, ki določajo dodelitev subvencij za kritje stro�kov projektov daljinskega ogrevanja in naprave Demkolec, v skladu s tem, kar je potrdila Komisija z odločbo [SG (2001) D/290565] z dne 25. julija 2001 v spisu „državne pomoči“ N 597/1998.
Contact between the Netherlands Government and the Commission
Stiki med nizozemsko vlado in Komisijo
By letter of 20 February 1998, the Netherlands Government informed the Commission of the proposed compensation payments to the four electricity generating undertakings and asked it to approve them in accordance with Article 24 of the Directive.
Z dopisom z dne 20. februarja 1998 je nizozemska vlada Komisijo obvestila o predvidenih izravnalnih plačilih v korist �tirih podjetij za proizvodnjo električne energije in zahtevala odobritev na podlagi člena 24 Direktive.
By letter of 16 October 1998, the Netherlands Government communicated additional information to the Commission and notified to it the transitional regimes, in particular the draft versions of Articles 6 to 8 of the future OEPS, intended to reflect Article 24 of the Directive and, in so far as was necessary, Articles 92 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 87 EC) and 93 of the EC Treaty (now Article 88 EC).
Z dopisom z dne 16. oktobra 1998 je ta vlada Komisiji poslala dodatne informacije in jo uradno obvestila o prehodnih režimih, zlasti o predlogu členov od 6 do 8 bodočega OEPS, in sicer na podlagi člena 24 Direktive in, kolikor je potrebno, člena 92 Pogodbe ES (ki je po spremembi postal člen 87 ES) in člena 93 Pogodbe ES (postal člen 88 ES).
By Decision 1999/796/EC of 8 July 1999 concerning the application of the Netherlands for a transitional regime under Article 24 of Directive 96/92 (OJ 1999 L 319, p.
V odločbi Komisije 1999/796/ES z dne 8. julija 1999 o pro�nji za prehodni režim, ki jo je Nizozemska vložila v skladu s členom 24 Direktive 96/92 (UL L 319, str.
34), the Commission took the view that the system of levies and the transfer of compensation payments provided for did not require a derogation from Chapters IV, VI or VII of the Directive and could not therefore be regarded as a transitional regime within the meaning of Article 24 of the Directive.
34), je Komisija navedla svoje mnenje, da za predvideni sistem prelevmanov in prenos izravnalnih plačil ni potrebno odstopanje od poglavij IV, VI ali VII Direktive in ga zato ni mogoče �teti za prehodni režim v smislu člena 24 Direktive.
Point 42 of the grounds for Decision 1999/796 provides:
V točki 42 obrazložitve Odločbe 1999/796 je navedeno:
‘…The transfer of a compensation payment to certain electricity producers, financed through a levy or charge on the consumers is, therefore, a measure which is not directly addressed by the Directive but one which needs to be examined pursuant to the rules on competition, and in particular Article 87(3)(c) [EC] …’
„[…] Prenos izravnalnega plačila na nekatere proizvajalce električne energije, ki se financira s prelevmanom ali bremenom, ki ga nosijo potro�niki, je posledično ukrep, ki ga direktiva neposredno ne omenja, treba pa ga je preučiti glede na pravila o konkurenci, zlasti glede na člen 87(3)(c) [ES]. […]“
The ‘State aid’ issue gave rise to various communications, exchanges of letters and postponements to the time for examining the file in the period between the abovementioned notification of 16 October 1998 and the Commission’s decision of 25 July 2001.
Zaradi vidika „državnih pomoči“ je pri�lo v obdobju od zgoraj navedenega uradnega obvestila z dne 16. oktobra 1998 do izdaje odločbe Komisije z dne 25. julija 2001 do več različnih stikov, izmenjav dopisov in poročil o pregledu spisa.
According to the national court, while the Netherlands State did not formally notify Article 9 of the OEPS to the Commission, it did provide the Commission, by letter of 30 August 2000, with the entire draft version of the OEPS, including Article 9.
Predložitveno sodi�če je navedlo, da naj država Nizozemska ne bi formalno obvestila Komisije o členu 9 OEPS, ampak naj bi jo z dopisom z dne 30. avgusta 2000 obvestila o celotnem predlogu zakona OEPS, torej tudi o njegovem členu 9.
The Netherlands Government states that it sent the Commission the full text of that draft law together with the Explanatory Memorandum in respect of it.
Nizozemska vlada navaja, da je Komisiji poslala celotno besedilo tega predloga zakona, skupaj z njegovo obrazložitvijo.
The letter setting out that text dealt with a large number of subjects.
V dopisu, ki je vseboval to besedilo, je bilo obravnavanih veliko zadev.
As regards the protocol agreement which expired on 31 December 2000, the Netherlands Government stated that its legal basis might be withdrawn, that is to say that Article 97 of the EW 1998 might be repealed.
Glede protokola k sporazumu, ki mu je veljavnost potekla 31. decembra 2000, je nizozemska vlada navedla, da je mogoče, da zanj ni več pravne podlage, torej bi bil člen 97 EW 1998 lahko razveljavljen.
As the Commission had expressed doubts concerning the compatibility of Articles 6 to 8 of the draft OEPS with the Treaty, the Netherlands Government decided not to bring those articles into force and to provide for some non-market-compatible costs to be financed out of general resources.
Ker je Komisija izrazila dvome o združljivosti členov od 6 do 8 predloga zakona OEPS s Pogodbo, naj bi se nizozemska vlada odločila, da se odpove začetku veljavnosti teh zadnjenavedenih členov in da zagotovi financiranje nekaterih s trgom nezdružljivih stro�kov s splo�nimi sredstvi.
That Government had, in the letter of 30 August 2000 expressly informed the Commission of the fact that a price surcharge would be introduced by Article 9 of the draft OEPS.
Ta vlada naj bi v dopisu z dne 30. avgusta 2000 Komisijo izrecno seznanila z dejstvom, da je s členom 9 predloga zakona OEPS uvedeno doplačilo. Ta dopis naj bi bil tak:
‘In connection with the introduction, in 2000, of a new price structure under the [EW] 98, a structure under which prices will be divided into a price for distribution and a price for transmission, the draft law incorporates a provision under which the net operators and the generating undertakings may temporarily raise their prices.
„V okviru tega, ko je za leto 2000 na podlagi [EW] 1998 uvedena nova cenovna struktura, to je struktura, v kateri bodo cene razdeljene na ceno distribucije in ceno prenosa, predlog zakona vsebuje določbo, da lahko upravljavci omrežij in distribucijska podjetja začasno dvignejo cene.
The purpose of this is to ensure that the former distribution undertakings which are parties to the protocol agreement can, even in respect of 2000, continue to meet their
S tem se zagotavlja, da lahko biv�a distribucijska podjetja, ki so bila stranke protokola k sporazumu, �e naprej, in tako tudi v letu
That measure is a logical consequence of the provision of the [EW 1998] which gave the protocol agreement a legal basis.
2000, izpolnjujejo obveznosti na podlagi tega protokola. Ta ukrep je logična posledica določbe [EW 1998], ki je bila pravna podlaga protokola k sporazumu.
For further details on that point, please see Article 9 of the draft [OEPS] and the passages in the Explanatory Memorandum which relate to that point.’
Za podrobnej�a pojasnila o tem bi želeli napotiti na člen 9 predloga zakona [OEPS] in na obrazložitev tega člena.“
According to the Commission, by its letter of 30 August 2000, the Netherlands Government asked the Commission to review Articles 6 to 8 of the draft OEPS in the light of Articles 87 EC and 88 EC, but not Article 9 of that draft law.
Po navedbah Komisije naj bi jo nizozemska vlada z dopisom z dne 30. avgusta 2000 pozvala, naj preveri ne člen 9 predloga zakona OEPS glede členov 87 ES in 88 ES, ampak člene od 6 do 8 tega predloga zakona.