natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
For further details of the conditions set out below, see the next section ‘Conditions applicable to award criteria in tender evaluation’ Please see also Recitals 1 and 2 of the Directive 2004/18/EC and Recitals 1 and 9 of the Directive 2004/17/EC;
Glej tudi uvodni izjavi1 in 2 Direktive 2004/18/ES ter uvodni izjavi1 in 9 Direktive 2004/17/ES.
For contracts awarded on the basis of the lowest price, the failure to take into account other award criteria (such as quality or social considerations) can to a certain extent be compensated by including high quality standards in the technical specifications for the contract (so that only offers complying with all the qualitative standards in the technical specifications will be taken into consideration at the award stage) or by including social considerations (depending on their nature) in the technical specifications (if such considerations are linked to the subjectmatter of the contract) or in the contract performance clauses (if they are only linked to performance of the contract).
Pri naročilih, ki so oddana na podlagi najnižje cene, se neupoštevanje drugih meril za ocenjevanje (na primer kakovost ali socialni vidiki) vdolo-čenem obsegu nadomesti zvključitvijo standardov glede visoke kakovosti vtehnične specifikacije naročila (tako da se pri oddaji upoštevajo le ponudbe, ki izpolnjujejo vse standarde kakovosti iz tehničnih specifikacij) ali zvključitvijo socialnih vidikov (odvisno od vrste naročila) vtehnične specifikacije (če so takšni vidiki povezani spredmetom naročila) ali določila oizvajanju naročila (če so povezani le zizvedbo naročila).
See recital 46 of Directive 2004/18/EC and recital 55 of Directive 2004/17/EC.
Uvodna izjava46 in člen53 Direktive 2004/18/ES.
• In a contract for the procurement of care for persons with disabilities, the award criteria may take into account requirements relating to meeting the specific needs of each category of user (e.g. personalisation of the service depending on the age, gender or social difficulties of the users, etc.).
• Pri javnem naročilu za oskrbo invalidov se lahko vmerilih za ocenjevanje upoštevajo zahteve vzvezi zizpolnjevanjem posebnih potreb posameznih kategorij uporabnikov (npr. prilagoditev storitve glede na starost, spol ali socialne težave uporabnikov itd.).
• In a contract for the procurement of recruitment tests and services for the public sector, the contracting authority can ask the tenderers to ensure that recruitment tests and services are designed and carried out in a way that ensures equal opportunities for all participants, irrespective of their age, gender and ethnic or religious background.
• Pri javnem naročilu za preizkus znanja kandidatov za zaposlitev in storitve zaposlovanja vjavnem sektorju lahko naročnik od ponudnikov zahteva, da se preizkusi znanja in storitve zaposlovanja načrtujejo in izvedejo tako, da so zagotovljene enake možnosti za vse udeležence, ne glede na njihovo starost, spol in etnično ali versko pripadnost.
• In a contract for the procurement of software or hardware, an award criterion may be included that relates the number of points awarded to the levels of accessibility or specific accessibility features proposed for various groups of persons with disabilities.
• Pri javnem naročilu za programsko ali strojno opremo se lahko vključi merilo za ocenjevanje, povezano sštevilom točk, dodeljenih glede na raven dostopnosti ali posebne značilnosti vzvezi zdostopnostjo za različne skupine invalidov.
This includes, for example, whether the product or service is accessible for partially-sighted persons or blind people, for the hard of hearing or deaf, for persons with intellectual disabilities, or those with mobility and dexterity impairments, etc.
To na primer vključuje, ali je izdelek oziroma storitev dostopna slabovidnim ali slepim osebam, naglušnim ali gluhim osebam, osebam zmotnjami vduševnem razvoju ali osebam zomejeno mobilnostjo ali omejeno gibljivostjo itd.
• Using award criteria relating to local purchases of equipment by the contractor (for example, in a contract for construction of a hospital) in order to stimulate creation of new jobs on the local market.
• Ne smejo se uporabiti merila za ocenjevanje vzvezi zzahtevo, da izvajalec opremo kupi od lokalnih ponudnikov (na primer pri naročilu gradnje bolnišnice), sčimer se spodbuja ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest na lokalnem trgu.
First of all, any such criterion is not linked to the subjectmatter of the contract (construction of the hospital).
Takšna merila niso povezana spredmetom naročila (gradnja bolnišnice).
Secondly, this criterion is also discriminatory, because it gives tenderers that buy their equipment on the local market an undue advantage over other tenderers who buy from elsewhere.
Poleg tega je to merilo diskriminatorno, ker daje ponudnikom, ki kupujejo svojo opremo na lokalnem trgu, neupravičeno prednost pred ponudniki, ki opremo kupujejo drugje.
• Using award criteria introduced at the last moment and not included in the tender documents.
• Ne smejo se uporabiti merila za ocenjevanje, ki se določijo vzadnjem trenutku in niso vključena vrazpisno dokumentacijo.
• Using award criteria that may grant undue discretion to the contracting authority.
• Ne smejo se uporabiti merila za ocenjevanje, na podlagi katerih ima naročnik neupravičeno diskrecijsko pravico.
For example, in a contract for IT equipment, an award criterion specifying that tenderers may receive between 1 and 20 points for the technical merits of the accessibility of the proposed products, without indicating the parameters or characteristics that the contracting authority will take into account to determine the exact number of points to be granted in each case, may give the contracting authority undue discretion for evaluation of the technical merits of the tenders.
Če se na primer pri naročilu za opremo IT uporabi merilo za ocenjevanje, ki določa, da lahko ponudniki dobijo od 1 do 20 točk za tehnične prednosti pri dostopnosti predlaganih izdelkov, pri čemer se ne navedejo parametri ali značilnosti, ki jih bo naročnik upošteval pri določitvi natančnega števila točk, dodeljenih vposameznem primeru, ima lahko naročnik stem neupravičeno diskrecijsko pravico pri ocenjevanju tehničnih prednosti ponudb.
It ensures that award criteria relate to the needs of the contracting authority, as defined in the subjectmatter of the contract.
Ta zakonodaja temelji na sodni praksi Sodišča. Osnovno pravilo vzvezi ssocialnimi merili za ocenjevanje temelji na zadevah C-513/99 (Concordia Bus) in C-448/01 (Wienstrom) ter direktivah ojavnem naročanju, ki se vsvojih prvih uvodnih izjavah izrecno sklicujeta na to prakso.
In its judgment in the ‘Wienstrom case’ (71) the CJEU provided further information on how the link with the subject of the contract should be interpreted.
Vsa merila za ocenjevanje morajo izpolnjevati štiri pogoje, ki so navedeni vprvem delu oddelka C1 zgoraj70.
The Procurement Directives explicitly allow social considerations to be included in award criteria.
To vpraksi pomeni, da ni nujno, da vsako posamezno merilo za ocenjevanje naročniku zagotovi gospodarsko prednost, ampak da morajo merila za ocenjevanje kot celota (tj.ekonomska in socialna) naročniku omogočiti določitev ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe.
All award criteria should meet the four conditions mentioned at the start of section C 1 above (70).
(a) Merila za ocenjevanje morajo biti povezana spredmetom naročila
CJEU judgment in case C-513/99.
Sodba Sodišča vzadevi C-513/99.
This judgement concerns environmental award criteria, but the same principles may be applied, mutatis mutandis to social award criteria in public procurement.
Ta sodba je povezana zokoljskimi merili za ocenjevanje, vendar se lahko enaka načela smiselno uporabljajo tudi za socialna merila za ocenjevanje pri javnih naročilih.
CJEU judgment in case C-448/01.
Glej uvodno izjavo46 Direktive 2004/18/ES in uvodno izjavo55 Direk-tive2004/17/ES.
The lack of clarity and objectivity of the award criteria in the Wienstrom case:
Pomanjkanje jasnosti in objektivnosti meril za ocenjevanje vzadevi Wienstrom:
Wienstrom case: In this case the CJEU ruled that in a tender for energy supply, a criterion relating solely to the amount of electricity produced from renewable sources in excess of the expected consumption of the contracting authority (which was the subject of the contract) could not be considered to be linked to the subjectmatter of the contract.
Zadeva Wienstrom: Sodišče je vtej zadevi odločilo, da merila, ki je vključeno vrazpis za dobavo energije in se nanaša izključno na količino električne energije, pridobljene iz obnovljivih virov, ki presega pričakovano porabo naročnika (kar je bil predmet naročila), ni mogoče šteti za povezanega spredmetom naročila.
To establish such a link to the subjectmatter of the contract, the criterion relating to the amount of electricity produced from renewable sources should have concerned only the electricity effectively supplied to the contracting authority.
Za vzpostavitev take povezave spredmetom naročila bi moralo biti merilo vzvezi skoličino električne energije, proizvedene iz obnovljivih virov, povezano le zelektrično energijo, dejansko dobavljeno naročniku.
In the Wienstrom case the CJEU found that, in order to give tenderers equal opportunities when formulating the terms of their tenders, the contracting authority has to formulate its award criteria in such a way that ‘all reasonably wellinformed tenderers of normal diligence interpret them in the same way’(*).
Sodišče je vzadevi Wienstrom ugotovilo, da mora naročnik za to, da bi vsem ponudnikom zagotovil enake možnosti pri oblikovanju pogojev ponudb, oblikovati svoja merila za ocenjevanje tako, da „si jih vsi razmeroma dobro obveščeni in običajno skrbni ponudniki razlagajo enako“*.
Another aspect of the necessary clarity and measurability of the award criteria, as formulated by the CJEU, was that the contracting authority can only set criteria against which the information provided by the tenderers can actually be verified. ed.
Drug vidik potrebne jasnosti in merljivosti meril za ocenjevanje, kot ga je navedlo Sodišče, je, da mora naročnik določiti samo merila, na podlagi katerih je mogoče dejansko preveriti informacije, ki jih predložijo ponudniki.
The specificity and measurability of the award criteria in the Concordia Bus case:
Specifičnost in merljivost meril za ocenjevanje vzadevi Concordia Bus:
Works contract: In the case of a contract incorporating social considerations, in a construction contract where the subjectmatter of the contract consists of building a school, an award criterion based on how much money the contractor would transfer to the local community outside the contract is not legally permissible, as it would not be linked to the subjectmatter of the contract.
Naročilo za izvedbo gradbenih del: Pri javnih razpisih, pri katerih se upoštevajo socialni vidiki, na primer pri javnem razpisu za gradnjo šole, vključitev merila za ocenjevanje, ki temelji na tem, koliko denarja bi izvajalec prenesel na lokalno skupnost zunaj naročila, ni zakonsko dovoljena, ker to ne bi bilo povezano spredmetom naročila.
The CJEU considered this system CJEU adequately specific and measurable.
Wienstrom zagotovilo dodatne informacije otem, kako
(*) b) Award criteria must be specific and objectively quantifiable able
* je treba razlagati povezavo spredmetom naročila.
In this case, the contracting authority did not determine the specific period for which the tenderers should state the amount that they could supply.
V tem primeru naročnik ni določil natančnega roka, v katerem bi morali ponudniki navesti količino, ki bi jo lahko dobavili.
In this case, extra points were awarded, among other things, for‘use of buses with nitrogen oxide emissions below 4 g/kWh (+ 2.5 points/bus) or below 2 g/kWh (+ 3.5 points/bus) and with external noise levels below 77 dB (+1 point/bus)’.
V tem primeru so bile dodatne točke dodeljene med drugim za „uporabo avtobusov z emisijami dušikovega oksida pod 4 g/kWh (+2,5 točke/avtobus) ali pod 2 g/kWh (+3,5 točke/avtobus) in z ravnjo zunanjega hrupa pod 77 dB (+1 točka/avtobus)“.
c) Award criteria must have been publicised previously
(c) Merila za dodeljevanje morajo biti predhodno objavljena
The CJEU ruled that, based on its previous judgments, award criteria must never confer unrestricted freedom of choice on contracting authorities.
Sodišče je na podlagi svojih predhodnih sodb odločilo, da morajo biti merila za ocenjevanje takšna, da naročniku ne zagotavljajo neomejene svobode izbire.
They must restrict this freedom of choice by setting specific, product-related and measurable criteria or, as the CJEU put it,‘adequately specific and objectively quantifiable’ criteria.
Svoboda izbire mora biti omejena sspeci čnimi in merljivimi merili, ki so povezana zizdelkom, ali kot se je izrazilo Sodišče, z„dovolj specifičnimi in objektivno merljivimi“ merili.
Both these cases concern environmental award criteria, but the principles deriving from these judgments may be applied mutatis mutandis to social award criteria.
Obe zadevi sta povezani zokoljskimi merili za ocenjevanje, vendar se lahko načela iz teh sodb smiselno uporabljajo tudi za socialna merila za ocenjevanje.
The‘additional criterion’ d) Award criteria must comply with EU law (including the fundamental principles of the TFEU)
(d) Merila za ocenjevanje morajo biti vskladu zzakonodajo EU (vključno stemeljnimi načeli PDEU)
The last condition derived from the TFEU and the Procurement Directives is that award criteria must comply with all the fundamental principles of EU law.
Zadnji pogoj, ki temelji na PDEU in direktivah ojav-nem naročanju, je, da morajo biti merila za ocenjevanje vskladu zvsemi temeljnimi načeli zakonodaje EU.
The CJEU has explicitly stressed the importance of the principle of non-discrimination, which is the basis of other principles, such as the freedom to provide services and freedom of establishment.
Sodišče je izrecno navedlo pomen načela nediskriminacije, ki je podlaga za druga načela, kot sta svoboda opravljanja storitev in svoboda ustanavljanja.
The issue of discrimination was expressly raised in the Concordia Bus case (73).
Vprašanje diskriminacije je bilo izrecno izpostavljeno vzadevi Concordia Bus73.
In case C-225/98 the CJEU held that contracting authorities can award a contract on the basis of a condition related to eg combating unemployment, provided this condition is in line with all the fundamental principles of EU law, but only where the authorities had to consider two or more equivalent tenders.
Sodišče je vzadevi C-225/98 odločilo, da lahko naročnik odda naročilo na podlagi pogoja, ki je na primer povezan zbojem proti brezposelnosti, če je ta pogoj vskladu zvsemi temeljnimi načeli zakonodaje EU, vendar le, kadar se mora naročnik odločati med dvema ali več enakovrednimi ponudbami.
The Member State in question regarded this condition as an additional, non-determining criterion and considered it only after tenders had been compared on the basis of the other award criteria.
Zadevna država članica je ta pogoj obravnavala kot dodatno in neodločilno merilo ter ga je upoštevala šele potem, ko so se ponudbe primerjale na podlagi drugih meril za ocenjevanje.
Finally, the CJEU stated that application of the award criterion regarding combating unemployment must have no direct or indirect impact on those submitting bids from other EU Member States and must be explicitly mentioned in the contract notice, so that potential contractors were able to know that such a condition existed.
Nazadnje je Sodišče navedlo, da uporaba merila za ocenjevanje, ki je povezan zbojem proti brezposelnosti, ne sme imeti neposrednega ali posrednega vpliva na ponudnike iz drugih držav članic EU in da mora biti to merilo izrecno navedeno vobvestilu ojavnem naročilu, da so morebitni izvajalci seznanjeni zobstojem takega pogoja.
One of the objections of Concordia Bus was that the criteria set by the Community of Helsinki were discriminatory because the Community’s own bus company HKL was the only company with gas-powered vehicles that could comply with the emission levels set.
Eden od ugovorov družbe Concordia Bus je bil, da so bila merila, ki jih je določila občina Helsinki, diskriminacijska, saj je bilo občinsko avtobusno podjetje HKL edino podjetje zvozili na plinski pogon, ki so lahko dosegala določene ravni emisij.
The CJEU ruled that the fact that one of a set of various award criteria imposed by the contracting authority could only be met by a small number of companies did not in itself make this discriminatory.
Sodišče je odločilo, da dejstvo, da lahko enega od več različnih meril za ocenjevanje, ki jih je določil naročnik, izpolnjuje le majhno število podjetij, ne pomeni, da je naročilo diskriminacijsko.
Therefore, when determining whether there has been discrimination, all the facts of the case must be taken into account.
Pri odločanju, ali gre za diskriminacijo, je torej treba upoštevati vsa zadevna dejstva.
Therefore, a criterion regarding combating unemployment (and other criteria which are not linked to the subjectmatter of the contract) can be taken into account at the award stage only as‘an additional criterion’ in order to choose between two equivalent tenders.
Zato se lahko merilo vzvezi zbojem proti brezposelnosti (in druga merila, ki niso povezana spredmetom naročila) pri ocenjevanju upošteva le kot „dodatno merilo“, ki se uporabi pri odločanju med dvema enakima ponudbama.
All other award criteria (other than the additional criterion) must be linked to the subjectmatter of the contract, as the CJEU ruled in 2001 in the ‘Wienstrom case’ (74) (see above).
Vskladu ssodbo Sodišča vzadevi Wienstrom iz leta200174(glej zgoraj) morajo biti vsa druga merila za ocenjevanje (razen dodatnega merila) povezana spred-metom naročila.
CJEU judgment in case C-448/01.
Sodba Sodišča vzadevi C-448/01.
Dealing with‘abnormally low bids’
Obravnavanje „neobičajno nizkih ponudb“
A tenderer may be excluded if the enquiry carried out in accordance with the above-mentioned rules of the Procurement Directives(*) finds the tender abnormally low as a consequence of non-compliance by the tenderer with the applicable rules regarding employment protection, payment of social contributions or of additional working hours, safety at work or prohibition of clandestine employment.
Ponudnik je lahko izključen, če se spoizvedbo, opravljeno vskladu znavedenimi pravili iz direktiv ojavnem naročanju*, ugotovi, da je ponudba neobičajno nizka, ker ponudnik ni upošteval veljavnih predpisov vzvezi zvar-nostjo zaposlitve, plačilom socialnih prispevkov ali nadur, varnostjo pri delu ali prepovedjo dela na črno.
The contracting authority may not impose complete and automatic exclusion of any tender that falls below a specified proportion (e.g. 80%) of the average price of all tenders received.
Naročnik ne sme določiti, da bo dokončno in samodejno izključil vsako ponudbo, ki bo nižja od določenega odstotka (npr. 80%) povprečne cene vseh prejetih ponudb.
Under the Procurement Directives, if contracting authorities consider a tender to be abnormally low, they must ask for explanations before they can reject it.
V skladu zdirektivama ojavnem naročanju mora naročnik pred zavrnitvijo ponudbe, za katero meni, da je neobičajno nizka, zahtevati obrazložitev.
The Directives state that these explanations may also refer (amongst other factors) to compliance with the ‘provisions relating to employment protection and working conditions in force at the place where the work, service or supply is to be performed’ (75).
Direktivi določata, da se lahko te obrazložitve (med drugim) nanašajo na skladnost z„določbami vzvezi zzaščito zaposlitve in delovnimi pogoji, ki veljajo vkraju izvedbe gradenj, storitev ali dobav blaga“75.
Thus, the Procurement Directives specifically link the issue of abnormally low tenders with the issues of employment protection and working conditions.
Direktivi ojavnem naročanju torej določata, da je vprašanje neobičajno nizkih ponudb izrecno povezano zvprašanjem varnosti zaposlitve in delovnih pogojev.
Some practices, including ignoring working conditions that are legally required, may give rise to unfair competition.
Zaradi nekaterih dejanj, vključno zneupošte-vanjem zakonsko določenih delovnih pogojev, se lahko pojavi nelojalna konkurenca.
France: The Ville d’Angers noticed that in the cleaning sector workers have tough work schedules.
Francija: Občinski organi v Angersu so ugotovili, da so delavci včistilnih podjetjih preobremenjeni.
Thus an offer which is economically extremely attractive because it proposes a lower number of workers than is appropriate to the surface area to be cleaned, based on average ratios, will be considered abnormally low and rejected if the bidder is unable to explain how he will be able to guarantee such a low price without infringing any applicable laws (such as laws regarding the maximum number of working hours per day).
Zato se bo obravnavalo, da je ponudba, ki je ekonomsko izjemno mamljiva, ker predvideva manj delavcev, kot bi bilo primerno glede na površino, ki jo je treba očistiti, določeno na podlagi povprečnih razmerij, neobičajno nizka in bo zavrnjena, če ponudnik ne bo mogel pojasniti, kako bo lahko zagotovil tako nizko ceno brez kršenja veljavne zakonodaje (kot so zakoni oomejitvi delovnega časa).
The contracting authority can ask in writing for details that it considers relevant to being able to assess an abnormally low bid.
Naročnik lahko pisno zahteva podatke, za katere meni, da jih potrebuje pri oceni neobičajno nizke ponudbe.
These can relate to employment protection and working conditions.
Ti podatki so lahko povezani zvarnostjo zaposlitve in delovnimi pogoji.
This does not appear to be restricted to requesting such details from the tenderer alone.
Ni nujno, da se ti podatki zahtevajo le od ponudnika.
In the case of working conditions, for example, it might be appropriate to request information from trade unions.
Kar zadeva delovne pogoje, je na primer primerno, da se zahtevajo informacije od sindikatov.
Where the contracting authority does obtain information from other sources, however, the Procurement Directives require the contracting authority to ‘verify those constituent elements by consulting the tenderer, taking account of the evidence supplied.’
Direktivi ojavnem naročanju določata, da mora naročnik, kadar pridobi informacije od drugih virov, „preveriti te elemente sposvetovanjem sponudnikom, pri čemer upošteva predložena dokazila“.
The practical rules regarding such verification by the contracting authority are governed by national law, it being understood that such rules must permit the tenderer to present his position.
Praktična pravila vzvezi stakim naročnikovim preverjanjem ureja nacionalna zakonodaja, pri čemer mora imeti ponudnik vskladu spredpisi možnost, da predstavi svoje stališče.
The Procurement Directives set out the procedures that the contracting authority must adopt before rejecting a tender on the ground that it is abnormally low (76).
Če se na podlagi poizvedbe ugotovi, da je ponudba neobičajno nizka, jo lahko naročnik zavrne (čeprav direktivi ojavnem naročanju ne določata, da je to nujno).
Each case should be treated on its merits; there should be no automatic exclusion; tenderers should have an opportunity to rebut the case against them; and the condition of nondiscrimination must be complied with.
Vendar pa mora naročnik vskladu zzakonodajo vnekaterih državah članicah kljub temu obvezno zavrniti take ponudbe.
If the enquiry finds that the offer appears abnormally low, the contracting authority may reject it (although the Procurement Directives place no obligation on it to do so).
Direktivi ojavnem naročanju določata postopke, ki jih mora izvesti naročnik, preden zavrne ponudbo zaradi neobičajno nizke cene76.
However, in Member States that have adopted legislation to this effect, contracting authorities can nevertheless be under an obligation to reject such tenders.
Vsak primer je treba obravnavati posebej, ponudbe se ne smejo samodejno zavrniti, ponudniki morajo imeti možnost, da spodbijajo odločitev, ki je bila sprejeta zoper njih, poleg tega pa mora biti izpolnjen pogoj onediskriminaciji.