natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
disposal of the cereals, contracting of the storage facilities, carrying out variouschecksand maintaining the required physical and accounting records.
To zajema odkup in prodajo žit, najem skladiščnih prostorov,izvajanjerazličnih pregledovter vodenjezahtevanih evidenc o zalogah in računovodskih evidenc.
The paying agenciesinput their physical and financial datainto a Commission-maintained computer database.
Plačilne agencije vnašajo svoje podatke ozalogahinfinančne podatkevračunalniškozbirko podatkov, ki jo vzdržuje Komisija.
The Commission uses this informationto monitor the situation and calculate the amounts due to orfrom Member States.
Slednja te informacije uporablja za spremljanje stanja in izračun zneskov, ki jih dolguje državam članicam oziroma jih države članice dolgujejo njej.
Producers or intermediaries are given the opportunity to sell cereals to intervention at the intervention price.
Proizvajalci ali posredniki imajo možnost, da žita prodajo v okviru intervencije po intervencijski ceni.
Before acceptance by the paying agency, the cereals are weighed and analysed to ensure that their quality satisfies the minimum conditions for intervention.
Preden jih plačilna agencija sprejme, se žita stehtajo in analizirajo, s čimer se zagotovi, da njihova kakovost izpolnjuje minimalne pogoje za intervencijo.
The paying agencies adjust the intervention price to take account of certain quality characteristics, such asthe moisture content,impurities andspecific weight.
Plačilne agencije prilagodijo intervencijsko ceno, tako da se upoštevajo določene značilnosti glede kakovosti, kotso vsebnost vlage, nečistočeinspecifičnateža.
The cereals are kept in Member State-contracted storage facilities (stores, such as warehouses and silos) which are required to meet minimum standards.
Žita se hranijo v skladiščnih prostorih (kot so razkladališča in silosi), ki jih pogodbeno najamejo države članicein morajoizpolnjevati najnižje zahtevane standarde.
Member State paying agencies are required to ensure that cereals in storage are properly conserved.
Plačilne agencije držav članic morajo zagotoviti, da se žita v skladiščih primerno hranijo. To pomeni, da je treba opraviti letni popis zalogin posebne ad hoc preglede vskladiščih.
The paying agencies inform the Commission whenever a loss or degradation occurs.
Plačilne agencije o vsakem primeru izgube ali razgradnje obvestijo Komisijo.
When this results in the cereals no longer fulfilling the conditions forintervention,the paying agencies orstorekeepers —ratherthanthe Community budget — bear the financial responsibility.
Kadar žita zaradi tega ne izpolnjujejo več pogojev za intervencijo, nastalo finančnostanje bremeni plačilne agencije ali upravljalceskladišč, ne pa proračun Skupnosti.
Any depreciation and other costs previously received for the degraded stock is reimbursed tothe Commission.
Vsakršna amortizacija in drugi stroški, ki so bili pred tem prejeti zaradirazgradnje zalog,se povrnejo Komisiji.
The Commission determines its approach to disposals of stored cereals on the basis ofits market forecasts.
Komisija določi svoj pristop k prodaji skladiščenih žit na podlagi svojih tržnih napovedi.
Tenders for the disposal ofcerealsare thenorganisedbythe Member States.
Državečlanice nato organizirajojavnerazpiseza prodajožit.
The Commission decides upon which offers to accept, after consultation with the Management Committee for Cereals, comprised of representatives from the Member States.
Komisija se po posvetovanju z upravnim odborom za žita, ki ga sestavljajo predstavniki držav članic, odloči, katere ponudbe bo sprejela.
The committee can reject any proposed decision by a qualified majority.
Odbor lahko s kvalificirano večino zavrne vsako predlagano odločitev.
The paying agencies are responsible for the implementation of the approved disposal operations.
Plačilne agencije so odgovorne zaizvajanje odobrenih dejavnosti prodaje.
AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH
OBSEG REVIZIJEIN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP
The Court audited the economy of the European Union support for the public storage operations of cereals, and in particular the extent to which costs have been minimised andrevenue maximised.
Sodišče je revidiralo gospodarnost podpore Evropske unije za dejavnosti jav-negaskladiščenja žitin zlastito, v kolikšni meriso bili doseženi najnižji možnistroškiin najvišji možni prihodki.
stocks in these Member States is explained by the fact that disposals were carried out sooner in other Member States for logistical reasons (transport to the markets) and the high volumes involved.
v teh državah članicah pojasnjuje dejstvo, da se je prodaja v drugih državah zaradi logističnih razlogov (prevoz na trge) in velikih količin zalog izvršila prej.
The questionssetforthis audit werethefollowing:
Pritejrevizijista bili zastavljeni naslednji vprašanji:
(a) Have the physical operations of the public storage of cereals been well managed?
(a) Ali je bilo upravljanje fizičnih dejavnostijavnega skladiščenja žit dobro?
(b) Do the Commission’s procedures ensure that the costs incurred by the EU are minimised?
(b)Ali postopki Komisije zagotavljajo, daima EU čim nižjestroške?
The audit approach consisted of:
Revizijski pristopje zajemal:
(a)assessing the procedures established by the Commission and the Member Statesforimplementingthe policy and providing data;
(a)ocenjevanje postopkov, ki so jih Komisija in države članice vzpostavile zaizvajanje politikein zagotavljanje podatkov;
(b)testing the compliance of storage operations in the two Member States visited; and
(b)preizkušanja skladnosti dejavnosti skladiščenja v dveh obiskanih državah članicahin
(c)checking the conditions of storage and quality of cerealsin a sample ofstores.
(c)preverjanje pogojevskladiščenjain kakovosti žit v vzorcuskladišč.
Theauditcoveredthestorage operations duringthefinancialyearthat ended on 30 October 2006 and the first five monthsofthefollowing financial year.
Revizija je zajela dejavnosti skladiščenja v proračunskem letu, ki se je končalo 30.oktobra2006,invprvihpetih mesecih naslednjega proračunskega leta.
The fieldwork undertaken in 2007 included the audit of the paying agencies in Germany and Hungary, which together accounted for91 % ofstocksin publicstorageatthetime oftheaudit8.The Court checkedthe storage conditions and quality of a sample of 18 cereallots in 11 storeslocatedin these Member States.
Pridobivanje revizijskih dokazov v letu 2007 je zajemalo revizijo plačilnihagencijv Nemčijiinna Madžarskem, ki sta s svojimi zalogami včasurevizijeskupaj predstavljali91 % vseh zalog v javnih skladiščih 8. Sodišče je skladiščne razmere in kakovost preverilo pri vzorcu 18 serij žit v 11 skladiščih v teh državah članicah.
The sample was selected on the basis ofthe quantitiesremaininginstorage andlogistical criteria.
Vzorecje bilizbran na podlagi preostalih količin vskladiščihin na podlagilogističnih meril.
HAVE THE PHYSICAL OPERATIONS OF THE PUBLIC STORAGE OF CEREALS BEEN WELL MANAGED?
ALI JE BILO UPRAVLJANJE FIZIČNIH DEJAVNOSTI JAVNEGA SKLADIŠČENJA ŽIT DOBRO?
Commission Regulation (EC)
Sodiščeje pritemrevizijskem vprašanju preučilo, v kolikšni meri:
(a)the cereals boughtin are oftherequired quality;
(a)odkupljena žita ustrezajo zahtevani kakovosti;
31), codified by Regulation (EC) No 687/2008 (OJ L 192, 19.7.2008, p. 20).
31), kodificirana z Uredbo (ES) št. 687/2008 (UL L 192, 19.7.2008, str. 20).
(b)the conditions ofstorage are appropriate;
(b)soskladiščnerazmere primerne;
10 The Member States visited were
10 Obiskane so bile naslednje
(d)the Commission actsin a wayto avoidstructuralstorage.
(d)Komisija delujetako, da prepreči strukturno skladiščenje.
THE ACCEPTANCE OF CEREALSINTO STORAGE the Czech Republic, Germany, France, Hungary and Slovakia.
SPREJEM ŽIT V SKLADIŠČENJE države članice: Češka republika, Nemčija, Francija, Madžarska in Slovaška.
The report of the visit in November 2006 to Hungary noted that although some problems were found, considerable improvements had been made since the previous visit in 2005.
V poročilu o obisku na Madžarskem novembra leta 2006 je bilo navedeno, da je kljub nekaterim ugotovljenim težavam prišlo do velikih izboljšav od prejšnjega obiska leta 2005.
The Court checked the compliance of the paying agencies’ acceptance procedures with the regulation in force at the time 9.
Sodišče je preverilo, ali so bili postopki plačilnih agencij za sprejem žit skladni s tedaj veljavno Uredbo 9. Revidirana je bila dokumentacija vzorca
The documentation ofasample of31 purchases was audited to verify their compliance and the correctness oftherelated payments.
31 odkupov, s čimer sta se preverili njihova skladnost ter pravilnost z njimi povezanih plačil.
No errors were detectedinthe sample and the documentation provided sufficient evidence that the paying agencies’ procedures had been carried out in accordance with the requirements ofthesameregulation.
V vzorcu niso bile odkrite nobene napake, dokumentacija pa je zagotovila zadostne dokaze, da so bili postopki plačilnih agencij izvedeni vskladu z zahtevamiiste uredbe.
THE PHYSICAL SAFEGUARD OF CEREALSIN STORAGE
FIZIČNA ZAŠČITA ŽIT V SKLADIŠČENJU
The Commission carried out checks in five Member States in 2005 and 2006, concludingthatthere wereno major problems regarding the storage conditions of cerealsinthose countries10.
Komisija je v letih 2005 in 2006 izvedla preglede v petih državah članicah ter pri tem zaključila, da pri skladiščnih razmerah za žita v teh državah ni bilo večjihtežav10.
The Court checkedthe appro- priateness oftheconditions of 18cereallotsstoredin 11storesin Germany and Hungary.
Sodiščeje preverilo primernostrazmerza 18serijžit v11skladiščihv Nemčijiinna Madžarskem.
Ninestores werefoundto besatisfactory. However, unsatisfactory storage conditions were identified in two stores, although the payingagencies had already taken appropriate remedial action and the quality ofthe cereals was not compromised.
Pri tem je ugotovilo, da je bilo devet skladišč zadovoljivih, v dveh skladiščih pa so bile ugotovljene nezadovoljive skladiščne razmere, vendar so plačilne agencije že sprejele ustrezne popravne ukrepe,tako da kakovost žit ni bila ogrožena.
THE DISPOSAL OF CEREALSIN STORAGE
PRODAJA ŽITIZ SKLADIŠČENJA
11 Article 5 of Commission Regulation
11 Člen 5 Uredbe Komisije (EGS,
The Court did not detect any weaknesses in the system for disposal operations at the paying agencies in Germany and Hungary.
Sodišče v plačilnih agencijah v Nemčiji in na Madžarskem ni ugotovilo nobenih slabosti v sistemu za dejavnosti prodaje.
The Court also reviewed the documentation of asample of 44 disposals.
Sodiščeje prav tako pregledalo dokumentacijo vzorca 44 prodaj.
This providedsufficient evidencethatthetransactions had been properly carried out.
To je zagotovilo zadostne dokaze, da so biletransakcije pravilnoizvedene.
12 Represents revenue foregone.
12 Predstavlja opuščen prihodek.
The Commission’s stock disposal policy — which is to support producers when market prices fall below the intervention price and to avoid undermining the market price11 — reflects its interpretation of the objectives of public storage(see paragraph1).The disposal policy does notaimtostabilise markets when prices are rising.
Politika glede prodaje zalog, ki je namenjena podpori proizvajalcem, kadar tržne cene padejo pod intervencijsko ceno, in preprečevanju spodkopavanja tržne cene11 , odraža njeno razlago ciljev javnega skladiščenja
Until recently, this did not have any impact becausethe market price of cereals was belowtheintervention price.
(glej odstavek). Cilj te prodajne politike ni stabilizacija trgov, kadar cene rastejo.
In its disposal decisions, the Commission sells either on the EU market, where it does not wish to undermine the internal market price, or on the export market, where it will accept lower prices to remove the excess stocks from the EU market.
Komisija se v svojih odločitvah o prodaji odloči za prodajo na trg EU, kjer ne želi spodkopati cene na notranjem trgu, ali na zunanji trg, kjerje pripravljena sprejeti nižje cene, da bi odpravila presežne zaloge na trgu EU.
When the EU market price exceeds the intervention price, this policy sometimes resultsin higher valueinternal market sales being forgone in order not to undermine the EU market prices.
Kadarcena natrgu EU presega intervencijsko ceno, se zaradi te politike včasih opustijo prodaje po višji vrednosti na notranjem trgu, da ne bi spodkopali cen na trgu EU.
However, the risk of disrupting the market is lower when markets are strong (characterised byrising prices).
Vendar je tveganje motenj trga manjše, kadar sotrgi močni(zanjeje značilnarast cen).
For example, in early 2007, 112 800 tonnes of Germanrye weresoldfor export at pricesranging between EUR 106 and EUR 113 pertonne, while on the same dates, offers of EUR 140 per tonne on the internal market were rejected because they were below the corresponding market price.
V začetku leta 2007 je bilo na primer za izvoz prodanih 112 800 ton nemške rži po ceni med 106in 113 EUR/tona, medtem koso bile vistem času na notranjem trgu zavrnjene ponudbe v višini 140 EUR/tona, ker so bile pod ustreznotržnoceno.
This had an opportunity cost12 of approximately EUR 3,3 million.
Nastal je oportunitetni strošek12 v višini približno 3,3 milijona EUR.
Further-more,inthecase of exportsthe EUreimbursesthecosts oftransportto the nearest point of export, whereas sales ontheinternal market do not give rise to any such reimbursement.
Poleg tega EU v primeruizvoza povrne stroške prevoza donajbližjegaizvoznega mesta, medtem ko pri prodaji na notranjem trgu ni nobenega takšnega nadomestila.
In this example, the export rather thaninternalsaleresultedin additional costs of EUR 1,9 million.
V tem primeru so zaradi izbire izvoza namesto notranje prodaje nastali dodatni stroški v višini 1,9 milijona EUR.
January and June 2006 at approximately 81 euro/tonne, while an average price of above 108 euro/tonne was being obtained on the market during this period.
januarjem in junijem leta 2006 po približno 81 EUR/tona, medtem ko se je v tem obdobju na trgu dosegala povprečna cena več kot 108 EUR/tona.
In the first six months of 2006, sales of German rye were made to the bioethanol sector atlower prices than could have been obtained on the market.
V prvih šestih mesecih leta 2006 se je nemška rž sektorju bioetanola prodajala po nižjih cenah, kot bi jih bilo mogoče doseči na trgu. Komisija trdi, da so bilete prodaje del programa poskusne podpore za energetski sektor.
This choice had no direct relationship with the economic management ofintervention stocks, and resultedin an opportunity cost of approximately EUR 5 million13.
Ta izbira ni bila neposredno povezana z gospodarskim upravljanjem intervencijskih zalog in je povzročila oportunitetni strošek v višini približno 5 milijonov EUR13.
14 In 2007, 667 000 tonnes of cereals
14 Leta 2007 je bilo za program
were withdrawn for the programme at an approximate potential loss of revenue of 40 euro/tonne which would have been earned if the cereals had been disposed of on the market.
umaknjenih 667 000 ton žit, pri čemer je nastala približna potencialna izguba prihodka v višini 40 EUR/tona, ki bi bil dosežen ob prodaji žita na trg.
15 Commission Regulation (EEC)
15 Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 2273/93
Since 1987, cereals have been withdrawn from EU public intervention stocks for the support of a Community programme to contribute to the well-being ofthe most deprived persons.
Od leta 1987 so se žita umikala iz javnih intervencijskih zalog EU v podporo programu Skupnosti za prispevek k blaginji najbolj ogroženih oseb.
This policyisfundedthroughthe budget linefortheintervention storage of cereals.
Ta politika se financira prek proračunske vrstice za intervencijsko skladiščenje žit.
Duetotherecentriseinthe market price of cereals, the opportunity cost(representing a subsidyfor the most deprived persons’ budget) can be estimated at EUR 26 million14for 2007.
Zaradi nedavnega zvišanja tržne cene žit je mogoče oportunitetni strošek (ki predstavlja subvencijo za proračun najbolj ogroženih oseb) za leto 2007 oceniti na 26 milijonov EUR14.
In the past the opportunity cost was lower than currently because the only alternative outletfor cereals wasthe export market.
Oportunitetni strošek je bil v preteklosti nižji kot sedaj, ker je bil izvozni trg edini nadomestni blagovni trg za žita.
1) only states that intervention centres should have, inter alia, an “advantageous geographical location”.
1) določa samo, da bi morali imeti intervencijski centri med drugim izbrano ustrezno lokacijo.
Disposing of stored cereals at below market price for bioethanol production, or withdrawing them for the benefit of the most deprived people in the EU, represents a cost to the EU budget (in the form of sales income forgone).
Prodaja skladiščenih žit pod tržno ceno za proizvodnjo bioetanola ali umik žit v korist najbolj ogroženih ljudi v EU predstavljata strošek v breme proračuna EU (v obliki opuščenega prihodka od prodaje).
However, the ‘subsidy’ element of such programmes is not allocated to the activities concerned.
Vendar ”subvencijski” element takšnih programov ni dodeljen zadevnim dejavnostim.
This leads to a lack of transparency in budgeting andreporting.
To povzroča pomanjkanje preglednosti prisprejemanju proračuna in poročanju.
The centralisation of the decision to sell products makes it difficult, in practice, to takeinto account the differencesin characteristics betweenlots.
Centralizacija odločitve o prodaji izdelkov v praksi otežuje upoštevanje razlik v značilnostih posameznih serij.
At each management committee meeting, the Commission sets a minimum disposal pricefor each Member State and producttype, with no distinction made for geographicallocation of the store.
Komisija na vsakem sestanku upravnega odbora določi minimalno prodajno ceno za vsako državo članicoin vrsto izdelkaterpritemnerazlikuje med geografskimi lokacijami skladišč.
All offers above the set price are accepted and allthose below arerejected.
Vse ponudbe nad določeno ceno se sprejmejo, tiste pod njo pa zavrnejo.
(a)ina Member State, all else being equal (such as the quality of the cereals), a lot in a less convenient location willreceiveloweroffers than asimilarlotin a more convenientlocation15;
(a) bo v državi članici, kadar so vsi drugi dejavniki (kot npr. kakovost žit) enaki,serija na manj primernilokaciji prejela nižje ponudbekot podobnaserija na primernejšilokaciji15;
(b)likewise, differences in the quality of the cereals in storage (in particular the levels of protein) could affect the value of the offers received.
(b)bi lahko na vrednost prejetih ponudb vplivale tudi razlike v kakovosti skladiščenih žit (zlasti beljakovinske ravni).
While the intervention price is adjusted to reflect such criteria (see paragraph 9),this principleis not applied on disposal.
Medtem ko je intervencijska cena prilagojena,tako da odražatakšna merila(glej odstavek 9), seto načelo pri prodaji ne uporablja.
In practice, cereal lots of lower quality or stored in less accessible locations willattractloweroffers.
V praksi se za manj kakovostne serije žit oziroma serije, shranjene na težje dostopnih lokacijah, običajno prejmejo nižje ponudbe.
When such offers, even if economically sound, are below the minimum disposal price set by the Commission, the lot will remain in storage.
Če so takšne ponudbe z ekonomskega vidika dobre, vendar so nižje od najnižje prodajne cene, ki jo določi Komisija, serije ostanejo v skladišču.
Keeping cereals in storage incurs continuing technical andfinancial costs chargedtothe Community budget.
Ohranjanje žit v skladiščenju povzročatehničneinfinančne stroške v breme proračuna Skupnosti.
For example, representatives of the paying agency in Germany indicated to the Court that the cereals remaining in storage at the time oftheaudit visit were mainlyinless favourably situated regions or stores.
Predstavniki plačilne agencije v Nemčiji so Sodišču na primer pojasnili, da so bila žita, ki so bila v času revizijskega obiska še v skladiščih, večinoma v geografsko manj ugodnihregijah aliskladiščih.
The offers received for those lots had been lower than for the other lots sold, as they reflected the additional transport costsinvolved, but were not accepted bythe Commission.
Prejete ponudbezate serije so bile nižje od ponudb za druge prodane serije, saj so odražale neizogibne dodatnestroške prevoza, vendarjih Komisija nisprejela.
THE AVOIDANCE OF STRUCTURAL STORAGE
PREPREČEVANJE STRUKTURNEGA SKLADIŠČENJA
As mentioned in paragraph 3, structural storage occurs when the intervention policyresultsin a persistentimbalance between supply and demandfor thestoredcereal.
Kotje navedeno v odstavku 3, do strukturnega skladiščenja pride, kadar intervencijska politika povzročistalno neravnovesje med ponudboskla-diščenih žitin povpraševanjem po njih.
Theresultis a build-up ofstocks overtimecaused by alevel of production whichreactstotheintervention priceratherthan market conditions.
Posledicaje postopno kopičenje zalog zaradi ravni proizvodnje, ki se odziva na intervencijsko ceno, namesto na tržne razmere.
The Court examined the extent to which the Commission managed cerealstoragetoreducetherisk ofstructuralstorage.
Sodišče je preučilo, v kolikšnem obsegu je Komisija upravljala skladiščenje žit tako, da bi zmanjšala tveganje strukturnega skladiščenja.
The Commission monitors the medium term prospects for the agricultural marketsby means of historical data and projections, updated every six months.
Komisija spremlja srednjeročne izglede za kmetijske trge z uporabo preteklih podatkov in napovedi, posodobljenih vsakih šest mesecev.
The impact of specific events, such as the accession of new Member States or planned changes to public storage, is evaluated either by the Commission itself or external consultants.
Vpliv posebnih dogodkov, kot so pridružitev novih držav članic ali načrtovane spremembe javnega skladiščenja, ocenjuje Komisija sama ali njeni zunanji svetovalci.
The state of the cereals market is regularly discussed between representatives of the Commission and Member States atthe cereal management committee meetings.
Predstavniki Komisije in držav članic na sestankih upravnega odbora za žitarednorazpravljajo orazmerah natrgu žit.
The data on which the Commission assesses the market is necessarily based on a number of assumptions and forecasts that can only be used as a guide to market trends.
Podatki, na podlagi katerih Komisija ocenjuje trg, neizogibno temeljijo na številnih predpostavkah in napovedih, ki jih je mogočeuporabitisamo kot vodnik za tržne trende.
It is especially difficult to makeaccuratelong-term forecasts about supply and demand because of the variables involved, such as the effect of climatic conditions on forthcoming harvests and the demand for cereals for the production of biofuel.
Ker gre za spremenljivke, kot so vpliv podneb-nihrazmer na prihodnježetvein povpraševanje požitihza proizvodnjo biogoriva,je posebejtežko pripravititočne dolgoročne napovedi glede ponudbein povpraševanja.
Actiontoreversethe negative effect ofintervention on certain products was only taken when arisk had actually materialised and wasforecastto worsen.
Ukrepi zaizničenje negativnega vplivainter-vencije na določeneizdelkeso bilisprejetišeletakrat, kosejetveganje dejansko uresničiloin naj bise po napovedihše poslabšalo.
For example, the Commission proposal to abolish intervention in rye was made in the context of the 2002 CAP reform, although it had already been apparentfor a number of yearsthat whereasthe supply ofrye was relativelystable, demand was declining.Exceptin urgentcasessuchas for maizein 2007,the pace ofthe Commission’s responses to structural storage is in practice dependent upon the timetable of larger reforms, rather than representing a quick and flexible reaction to marketcondi-tions.
Predlog Komisije za odpravo intervencije za rž je bil na primer pripravljen v okvirureforme SKPizleta 2002,čepravje bilože vrstoletjasno, daje povpraševanje po rži kljub relativno stabilni ponudbi upadalo. Hitrost odzivov Komisije na strukturno skladiščenje je razen v nujnih primerih, kotje bil prikoruzileta2007,v praksi odvisna odčasovnegarazporeda večjihreform,namesto da bi predstavljalahitroin prožnoodzivanjena tržne razmere.