natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‡ the project developed a high-quality questionnaire favouring a high response rate to a survey;
‡ Dobro sodelovanje med partnerji v medijih in zunaj medijev, ki je dvignilo kakovost raz-þirjanja.
‡ the coordinator successfully adapted to an evolving context;
‡ Koordinator se je uspeþno prilagajal okviru razvijanja projekta.
‡ the project results have a high potential for transferability because the topic has been ap-proached for the « r s t t i mffe i n E u r op e o r b e c a u s e t h e a p p r o a c h a n d o u tp uijt s c a n e a s i l y b e r e p l i c a t e d in other European countries.
‡ Rezultati projekta imajo visok potencial prenosljivosti, ker je bila ta tematika v Evropi ob-ravnavana prviｲ ali zato, ker je pristop in rezultate lahko replicirati v drugih evropskih dr™a-vah.
Daphne implementation and delivery mechanisms
Izvajanje in mehanizmi programa Daphne
The opinions of the coordinators were solicited on the Daphne submission and contract pro-cedures, the Daphne website, the support from Daphne during the project and the evaluation and monitoring systems.
Koordinatorje smo prosili za mnenje o postopkih predlo™itve vloge in pripravi pogodbe za Daphne, o spletnih mestih Daphne, o podpori programa Daphne med projektom in o sistemih vrednotenja ter spremljanja.
As for other parts of the survey, the «eldevaluatorshavevalidatedthe consistency of these opinions.
Glede drugih delov raziskave so podroｲni ocenjevalci vrednotili doslednost teh mnenj.
This section considers the 218 projects funded from 1997 to 2003, except for the topics re-lated to the ex-post evaluation exercise that refers to the completed projects only.
V tem razdelku je upoþtevanih 218 projektov, «nanciranihodleta1997do2003,razenzate-matiko, ki je povezana z izvedbo vrednotenja po zakljuｲku projekta in samo za dokonｲane projekte.
Level of satisfaction with the Daphne submission and contract procedures
Raven zadovoljnosti s postopki predlo™itve in priprave pogodbe v programu Daphne
Daphne submission and contract procedures
Daphne › postopki predlo™itve in priprave pogodbe
% of satis«edcoordinators
Dele™ zadovoljnih koordinatorjev
Clarity of guidelines and supporting documents at time of preparation of submission
Jasnost navodil in spremljajoｲe dokumentacije v ｲasu priprave predloga za oddajo
Promptness of the contracting p h a s e Q u a l i tffy of EC support during negotiation of cffo n t r a c t Q u a l i tffy of EC support during the preparation p h a s e T r a n s p a r e n c y of the selection process
Pasovna toｲnost faze sklepanja p o g o d b e K a k o v o s t podpore Evropske komisije med pogajanji o p o g o d b i K a k o v o s t podpore Evropske komisije v pripravljalni f a z i P r e g l e d n o s t izbirnega postopka
Level of satisfaction with the Daphne website
Raven zadovoljnosti s spletnim mestom Daphne
Usefulness of the Daphne website when preparing s u b m i s s i o n s T i mffe l i n e s s of the information on the w e b s i t e U s e r - f r i e n d l i n e s s of the w e b s i t e U s e f u l n e s s of the Daphne website as a means of sharing results of projects
Uporabnost spletnega mesta kot sredstva za deljenje rezultatov projektov z drugimi
Level of satisfaction with the Daphne support during the project
Raven zadovoljnosti s postopki vlo™itve in priprave pogodbe v programu Daphne
Reachability of the EC s t a . d u r i n g t h e p r o j e c t R e l e v a n c e of advice/information received from the EC during the p r o j e c tP e r t i n e n c e and clarity of the comments made on the p r o j e c t s / a c cffo u n t s F l e x i b i l i tffy allowed by the EC in managing the cffo n t r a c tP r o m p t n e s s of the payment procedures
Dosegljivost osebja Evropske komisije med p r oj e k t o m U s t r e z n o s t nasvetov/informacij, prejetih od Komisije med projektom Primernost in jasnost pripomb na p r oj e k t e / r a ｲ uffn e F l e k s i b i l n o s t , ki jo je dopustila Komisija pri upravljanju p r oj e k t a P r a v o ｲ a s n o s t postopkov izplaｲil
Level of satisfaction with the evaluation and monitoring systems
Vsaj dve tretjini projektov je zadovoljnih z veｲino podroｲij.
For most of the topics, at least two thirds of the projects are satis«ed.Overall,thelevelsofsatisfaction were a bit lower for the initiative than for the programme.
Na sploþno je raven zadovoljnosti za pobudo nekoliko ni™ja kot za program.
The analysis of the level of satisfaction of `transparency of the selection process' and of `qual-ity of EC support during the preparation phase' over time shows that a larger proportion of project coordinators were satis«edoverthelastfewyears(from2001to2003)comparedwiththe previous years.
Analiza ravni zadovoljnosti s ¶preglednostjo izbirnega postopkaƒ in ¶kakovostjo podpore Ev-ropske komisije v pripravljalni faziƒ skozi ｲas ka™e, da je v zadnjih nekaj letih dele™ zadovoljnih projektnih koordinatorjev veｲji (od 2001 do 2003) v primerjavi s prejþnjimi leti.
% of satis«edprojectcoordinatorsovertime1998199920002001200252 33 50 66 61
Dele™ zadovoljnih projektnih koordinatorjev skozi ｲas199719981999200020012002200358 %52 %33 %50 %66 %61 %63 %
Transparency of selection process
Preglednost izbirnega postopka
Quality of EC support during preparation phase
Kakovost podpore Evropske komisije v pripravljalni fazi
Remark: Other examples of good practices and methodologies developed by Daphne projects (19) can be read on the Daphne website: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Pripomba: O drugih primerih dobre prakse in metodologij, razvitih s projekti Daphne (19), lahko berete na spletni strani Daphne: h t tp : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / f uffn d i n g / d a p h n e / f uffn d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
From this brief overview it is clear that the Daphne experience has been rich indeed and that the aims of the European Parliament in establishing the Daphne initiative and the Daphne programme 2000›03 have been largely met.
Iz tega kratkega pregleda je razvidno, da so izkuþnje, pridobljene prek izvajanja programa Daphne, resniｲno bogate, in da so bili cilji Evropskega parlamenta ob oblikovanju pobude Daphne in programa Daphne 2000›2003 v veliki meri izpolnjeni.
The capacity of organisations in Europe to pro-tect children, young people and women from violence in its many forms has been enhanced.
Sposobnost evropskih orga-nizacij, da þｲitijo otroke, mladino in ™enske pred þtevilnimi pojavnimi oblikami nasilja, je bila poveｲana.
Children, young people and women have been protected and supported. The knowledge base has been expanded and tools have been produced that will continue to empower both victims of violence and those who work on their behalf.
Temeljno poznavanje te problematike je bilo poglobljeno, oblikovana pa so bila tudi orodja, ki bodo tudi v prihodnje ™rtvam nasilja in tistim, ki jih zastopajo, zagotavljala veｲ mo™nosti v okviru boja proti nasilju.
But the huge challenge remains prevention of violence in the future and the imperative to reduce violence now.
Po drugi strani pa sta dolgoroｲno prepreｲevanje nasilja in potreba po takojþnjem zmanjþanju nasilja izziva, s katerima se bo morala Evropa tudi v prihodnje spopasti.
For this to happen, work needs to continue on identifying and understanding the causes of violence and the perpetrators of it.
Za uresniｲitev teh ciljev je treba nadaljevati delo v zvezi s prepoznavanjem in razumevanjem vzrokov nasilja in njegovih povzroｲiteljev.
Tough decisions will have to be made that require political commitment and that focus on law enforcement, combating drug and alcohol abuse, reduc-ing crime and sending out clear messages of zero tolerance.
Potrebno bo sprejeti te™ke politiｲne odloｲitve in vlo™iti veliko truda v dosledno izvajanje zakonodaje, boj proti zlorabi drog in alkohola, zmanj-þevanje nasilja in v poþiljanje jasnih sporoｲil, da je strpnost do nasilja nekaj povsem nespre-jemljivega.
A veritable army of Europeans has been mobilised through the work of Daphne projects, and the tools they need to contribute to the «ghtagainstviolenceareathand.Thisisonebattlethat must be won.
Projekti v okviru programa Daphne so mobilizirali pravcato vojsko Evropejcev in jo opremili z orodji, ki jih potrebuje za spopad z nasiljem. To je bitka, ki jo Evropa mora dobiti.
A compilation of the 303 projects funded from 1997 to 2003, with lessons and tools, is available in the Daphne Toolkit: h t tp : / / d a p h n e - t o o l k i t . o r g
Opisi 303 projektov, vkljuｲno z nasveti in primeri, ki so bili «nanciranivobdobjuod1997do2003, je na voljo v Daphne Toolkit: h t tp : / / d a p h n e - t o o l k i t . o r g
A website about the Daphne programme can be found at the following address: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Spletna stran o programu Daphne je na voljo naslednjem naslovu: h t tp : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / f uffn d i n g / d a p h n e / f uffn d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Information about the Justice, Freedom and Security Directorate-General can be found at: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / i n d e x _ e n . h t m
Informacije o Generalnem direktoratu za pravosodje, svobodo in varnost lahko najdete na spletnem naslovu: h t tp : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / i n d e x _ e n . h t m
Enquires about the Daphne programme can be made via:
Kakrþna koli vpraþanja v zvezi s programom Daphne lahko naslovite na:
The postal address is:
Poþtni naslov:
The o/celocationis:
Naslov urada:
Violence in Europe and mobilised groups
Nasilje v Evropi in anga™irane skupine
Groups mobilised through project activity‡ Children, young people and women victims
Skupine, anga™irane v projektnih dejavnostih:‡ Otroci, mladina in ™enske ™rtve
Forms of violence addressed‡ Child sexual abuse
‡ Javne ustanove in z zakonom ustanovljene organizacije
‡ EU regional and local representatives‡ Municipal authorities‡ Helpline operators‡ Expert groupings‡ Policy-makers at EU level‡ Police, juvenile o.enders'services‡ Hospitals and healthcare providers‡ Counselling services‡ Social workers and authorities‡ Teachers, teacher trainees, education managers‡ Streetworkers and outreach organisations‡ Media professionals‡ Migrant communities‡ Cultural organisations‡ Tertiary students and student unions‡ Shelter and refuge operators‡ Human resource managers, corporate managers‡ Trade unions and employers' organisations‡ Community workers‡ Families, parents and parents-to-be‡ Church groups including youth clubs‡ Law-makers, judiciary‡ Youth groups‡ Public institutions and statutory organisations‡ Sta.ofresidentialinstitutions‡ Research institutions‡ Prison personnel‡ Military personnel‡ NGO personnel‡ Childcare workers‡ Volunteer associations‡ Immigration o/cials‡ Men against violent men‡ Policy-makers at local, national and regional level‡ Grassroots community organisations and clubs‡ More general public awareness-raising
‡ Zloraba otrok (sploþno)‡ Ranljivost pogreþanih otrok‡ Izkoriþｲanje potujoｲih domaｲih delavcev‡ Nasilje zaradi uporabe drog in alkohola‡ Rasistiｲno nasilje‡ Kulturno in etniｲno nasilje‡ Posilstvo‡ Dru™insko nasilje nad ™enskami in otroci‡ Dru™bena osamitev‡ Zloraba invalidnih ™ensk‡ Mladostniþko nasilje‡ Nasilje v dru™ini‡ Pohabljanje ™enskih spolnih organov‡ Trgovina z ™enskami in otroci‡ Spolno izkoriþｲanje otrok v komercialne namene‡ Zloraba ™ensk na pode™elju‡ Samopoþkodovanje med mladimi‡ Zloraba avtistiｲnih ™ensk in otrok‡ Nasilje nad prosilci azila in begunci‡ Nasilje nad istospolnimi osebami‡ Spolno nadlegovanje na delovnem mestu‡ Nasilje med vrstniki v þolah‡ Otroþka pornogra«janainternetu‡ Nasilje nad starejþimi ™enskami‡ Nasilje v izobra™evalnih centrih‡ Telesno kaznovanje otrok‡ Spolna zloraba otrok v ustanovah
‡ Child abuse (general)‡ Vulnerability of being missing (children)‡ Exploitation of migrant domestic workers‡ Drug- and alcohol-induced violence‡ Racially motivated violence‡ Cultural and ethnic violence‡ Rape‡ Domestic violence against women and children‡ Social isolation‡ Abuse of handicapped women‡ Adolescent violence‡ Family violence‡ Female genital mutilation‡ Tra/ckingofwomenandchildren‡ Commercial sexual exploitation of children‡ Abuse against rural women‡ Self-harm among young people‡ Abuse of autistic women and children‡ Violence against asylum-seekers and refugees‡ Violence against homosexuals‡ Sexual harassment at work‡ Bullying in schools‡ Child pornography on the Internet‡ Violence towards elderly women‡ Violence in educational centres‡ Physical punishment of children‡ Sexual abuse of children in institutions‡ Prostitution and tra/ckingaroundmilitarybases‡ Violence against women in prison‡ Violence in families in military settings‡ Social violence against gypsy women‡ Sexual abuse of people with mental disability‡ Sexual violence by boys aged 12›16‡ Violence against women in cities‡ Violent crime‡ Violence against women in a church context‡ Domestic slavery‡ Gender-di.erentiatedviolence‡ Violence in poor socioeconomic conditions‡ Violence in the media‡ Racial and neo-fascist violence‡ Linguistic violence‡ Violence against unaccompanied minors
‡ Nasilje nad ™enskami v zaporu‡ Dru™insko nasilje v vojaþkem okolju‡ Dru™beno nasilje nad romskimi ™enskami‡ Spolna zloraba duþevno motenih ljudi‡ Spolno nasilje fantov, starih med 12 in 16 let‡ Nasilje nad ™enskami v mestih‡ Kriminal z elementi nasilja‡ Nasilje nad ™enskami v cerkvenem okolju‡ Zasu™njevanje v dru™ini ‡ Seksistiｲno nasilje‡ Nasilje v slabih dru™beno-gospodarskih razmerah‡ Medijsko nasilje‡ Rasistiｲno in neofaþistiｲno nasilje‡ Besedno nasilje
Groups mobilised through project activity
Skupine, anga™irane v projektnih dejavnostih:
Forms of violence addressed‡ Dangerous care
‡ Þkoda zaradi institucionalizacije otrok, starih od 0 do 3 let
‡ Violence against children with learning disabilities‡ Inter-family battery‡ Violence in schools‡ Violence in post-con‹ictsituations‡ Sexually abusive behaviour in institutions‡ Psychological violence‡ Intentional injury‡ Violence amongst adolescents/peer violence‡ Violence in cases of family break-up‡ Bonded labour‡ Violence in degraded urban areas‡ Violence against visually handicapped women‡ Torture and its aftermath‡ Harm of institutionalisation of 0›3 year-olds‡ Institutional violence‡ Violence through forced/inter-country marriage‡ Violence in temporary children's holiday places‡ Honour-based violence‡ Street-based violence‡ Online stalking and sexual predators‡ Stalking‡ Mobbing
‡ Nasilje v ustanovah‡ Nasilje v obliki prisilnih/meddr™avnih porok‡ Nasilje na zaｲasnih poｲitniþkih krajih za otroke‡ Nasilje na podlagi ｲasti‡ Uliｲno nasilje‡ Internetno zalezovanje in spolno nadlegovanje‡ Zalezovanje‡ Skupinsko nasilje
E n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s a r e p r o t a g o n i s t s i n t h e p r o j e c t
Konｲni prejemniki so bili nosilci projekta
Justi«cationforselection: Disabled women organisations are protagonists in the project.
Utemeljitev izbire: Nosilci projekta so organizacije za telesno prizadete ™enske.
Description of good practice: The strength of the project was the involvement of the dis-abled women, since two of the partners were associations of disabled women, which gen-erated great visibility and, later, political interest.
Opis dobre prakse: Projektu je dalo moｲ vkljuｲevanje prizadetih ™ensk, saj sta bila dva od part-nerjev zdru™enji prizadetih ™ensk, kar je izoblikovalo moｲno opaznost in pozneje politiｲni inte-res.
The bene«ciariesthemselvespreparedthe METIS guide which gave it great strength.
Prejemniki so sami pripravili vodnik METIS, kar je vzrok njegovega velikega vpliva.
The guide identi«esparticularsituationsofviolence that were unrecognised in Spain before this project and suggests how to confront them. The very fact that disabled women were carrying out an EU project with transna-tional partners gave it political interest, so that they could talk about human rights and personal development, issues not previously discussed with disabled women.
Vodnik opisuje nekatere situacije, v katerih prihaja do nasilja in jih v Þpaniji pred izvedbo projekta niso obravnavali, daje pa tudi predloge, kako se z njimi sooｲiti. çe samo dejstvo, da so evropski pro-jekt izvajale prizadete ™enske z nadnacionalnimi partnerji, je projektu dalo politiｲni interes, saj so lahko govorile o ｲlovekovih pravicah in osebnem razvoju, o teh vpraþanjih pa se pred tem v dru™bi ni razpravljalo.
The project was also very impressive in a transnational way, involving Spanish, Danish, German and English partners.
Projekt je bil naredil vtis tudi s svojo nadnacionalno zasnovo, saj so v njem sodelovali þpanski, danski, nemþki in angleþki partnerji.
The project cost relatively little money for providing a large number of signi«cantandlastingoutputs.
Sam projekt je stal relativno malo de-narja, prinesel pa je mnoge pomembne in trajne rezultate.
Condition of transfer/replication: This project should be replicable anywhere that disabled people have established their own associations.
Pogoj prenosa/replikacije: Ta projekt je mogoｲe replicirati povsod, kjer imajo prizadeti ljudje svoja zdru™enja.
Fomenting the formation of such associa-tions could form part of the programme.
Podpiranje nastajanja takih zdru™enj bi bilo lahko del programa.
The research that revealed the `hidden' or unrec-ognised form of violence on disabled women would almost certainly be replicated in many other countries.
Raziskavo, ki je razkrila ¶skritoƒ ali nepriznano obliko nasilja nad prizadetimi ™enskami, bi bilo skoraj zagotovo mogoｲe replicirati v mnogih drugih dr™avah.
Justi«cationforselection: Outstanding methodology regarding the involvement of end-bene«ciaries;impactonend-bene«ciaries.
Utemeljitev izbire: Izjemna metodologija za vkljuｲevanje konｲnih prejemnikov; vpliv na konｲne prejemnike
Description of good practice: This project created an extraordinary capacity for e n d - b e n - e « c i a r i e s , i . e . p e op l e w i t h l e a r n i n g d i s a b i l i t i e s , t o h a v e d i r e c t i m p a c t o n t h e l i v e s o f o t h e r e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h r o u g h i n v o l v i n g a n d e m po w e r i n g t h e m .
Opis dobre prakse: Projekt je za konｲne prejemnike, torej ljudi z uｲnimi ovirami, ustvaril posebno mo™nost vplivanja na ™ivljenje drugih konｲnih prejemnikov z njihovim osebnim vkljuｲevanjem in spodbujanjem samozavesti.
T h e y w e r e d i r e c t l y e n g a g e d i n the project especially in advising on and execution of public dissemination activities such as training sessions and `lectures'.
V projekt so bili vkljuｲeni neposredno, zlasti v svetovanje in izvajanje razþirjanja rezultatov projekta v javnosti z dejavnostmi, kot so bile ure usposabljanja in ¶predavanjaƒ.
The project's leading outputs are also good practice material, included anti-bullying materials for the information and education campaign (IEC) in favour of people with learning disabilities. End-bene«ciariesparticipatedinthecam-paign.
Najvidnejþi rezultati projekta so tudi gradivo za dobro prakso in gradiva proti zastraþevanju, namenjena kampanji informiranja in izobra™evanja v dobro ljudi z uｲnimi ovirami. Konｲni prejemniki so sodelovali v kampanji. Ciljna javnost za kampanje razþirjanja projekta je bila dobro izbrana, tako da gradivo ni konｲalo v smeteh.
The audience for dissemination campaigns was well targeted to avoid them ending up in the rubbish bin.
Glede na konｲne prejemnike je bil to projekt z najveｲjim vplivom.
The project had greatest impact with regard to end-bene«ciaries.People with learning disabilities directly involved in the project showed substantial im-provement in their self-esteem, self-con«denceandunderstandingoftheirsituationandwhat they can do about it.
Ljudje z uｲnimi ovirami, ki so neposredno sodelovali v projektu, so pokazali znatno izboljþano samospoþtovanje, samozavest in razumevanje svojega polo™aja in tega, kaj lahko storijo glede tega.
End-bene«ciariesalsoreportedtopartnersthelowerincidenceof abuse in their own neighbourhood a.ectedbytheprojectactivity.
Konｲni prejemniki so partnerjem poroｲali tudi o ni™ji pojavnosti zlorab v svoji soseski, na kar je vplivalo delovanje projekta.
Condition of transfer/replication: It is critical to have the direct engagement of end-ben-e«ciaries,especiallyinadvisingonandexecutionofpublicdisseminationactivitiessuchastraining sessions and `lectures'.
Pogoj prenosa/replikacije: Neposredno vkljuｲevanje konｲnih prejemnikov je kljuｲnega pomena, zlasti pri svetovanju in izvrþevanju dejavnosti javnega razþirjanja, kot so bile ure usposabljanja in ¶predavanjaƒ.
It is important to provide su/cientguidanceandassistanceto e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t h e c a m p a i g n t o f o s t e r t h e bu i l d i n g o f t h e i r o w n cffo n - « d e n c e .
Pomembno je, da se konｲnim prejemnikom, ki sodelujejo v kampanji, zagotovi ustrezno usmerjanje in pomoｲ, ki spodbujata razvijanje njihove samo-zavesti.
I t w o u l d w o r k w i t h o t h e r t a r g e t g r o up s s u . e r i n g t h e s a mffe p r o b l e m s a s t h e l e a r n -
Projekt bi se obnesel z drugimi ciljnimi skupinami, ki imajo enake te™ave, na drugih lokacijah.
Justi«cationforselection: Bottom-up project, taken up for funding by Dutch national gov-ernment, quality of project results.
Utemeljitev izbire: Projekt deluje od spodaj navzgor, podprla ga je nizozemska nacionalna oblast, kakovost rezultatov.
Description of good practice: The project worked closely with migrant groups and pro-duced a way of training them to work with their own people on issues of domestic violence within their family.
Opis dobre prakse: Projekt je deloval v tesni povezavi s skupinami migrantov in je izoblik-oval naｲin usposabljanja za delo z njihovimi lastnimi ljudmi pri reþevanju vpraþanj nasilja v dru™ini.
Migrant and ethnic groups were central to the project, because its very nature was to reveal di.eringconceptsaboutviolenceandgenderacrosscultures.Thiswasa very multicultural project that succeeded in arriving at a mutual understanding and good practices that could cross boundaries.
V srediþｲu projekta so bile skupine migrantov in etniｲne skupine, njegovo bistvo je bilo v razkrivanju razliｲnosti dojemanja nasilja in spola v razliｲnih kulturnih okoljih. Pro-jekt je bil izrazito veｲkulturen in je uspel doseｲi vzajemno razumevanje ter udejanjiti dobro prakso, s katero je mogoｲe presegati kulturne loｲnice.
The project was taken up for funding by the Dutch national government, raising visibility and importance at the national level.
Financiranje projekta je podprla nizozemska vlada, s tem pa sta se poveｲala njegova opaznost in pomen na nacionalni ra-vni.
Condition of transfer/replication: This project should be replicable in all EU countries.
Pogoj prenosa/replikacije: Projekt bi bilo mogoｲe replicirati v vseh dr™avah EU.
The key would be to « n d a cffo o r d i n a t o r w i t h t h e s a mffe v a l u e s a s P r o Jo b w i t h r e g a r d t o a l l o w i n g m i g r a n t / e t h n i c groups to head up cultural research.
Kljuｲ do tega bi bil koordinator z enakimi vrednotami kot P r oJ ob , ki bi migrantom/etniｲnim skupi-nam omogoｲil voditi kulturno raziskavo.
Terminology on migration and ethnic-ity varies from country to country, so that the Dutch de«nitionwouldhavetobemodi«edto suit the local context.
Izrazje na podroｲju migracij in etniｲnosti se razli-kuje od ene dr™ave do druge, zato bi bilo treba nizozemsko de«nicijoprilagoditi,dabiustrezala lokalnim okvirom.
Unique methodology
Edinstvena metodologija
Justi«cationforselection: Outstanding methodology dealing with tra/ckedwomenfromforeign countries.
Utemeljitev izbire: Izjemna metodologija za obravnavanje ™ensk › ™rtev trgovine z ljudmi › iz tujih dr™av.