natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is a knowledge-based approach — aimed at ensuring that decisions on whether and how to proceed with an initiative are based on solid evidence and a thorough analysis of options.
To je pristop, ki temelji na znanju – njegov cilj je zagotoviti, da odločitve, ali in kako naj se pobuda nadaljuje, temeljijo na trdnih dokazih in temeljiti proučitvi vseh možnosti.
One of the options which is now routinely assessed is the option of taking no action at EU level. is allows the Commission to take decisions from a range of options, each with their corresponding benefits and costs.
Ena od možnosti, ki se zdaj rutinsko presoja, je možnost neukrepanja na ravni EU. Tako se lahko Komisija odloči med celo vrsto možnostmi, od katerih vsaka prinaša svoje koristi in stroške.
Impacts of improving air quality
Vplivi izboljšanja kakovosti zraka
The impact assessment underpinning the air quality thematic strategy, adopted in 2005, allowed the Commission to take a decision on the right level of ambition for European air quality policy, based on the best analysis available.
Zaradi presoje vpliva, ki podpira Tematsko strategijo o kakovosti zraka, sprejeto leta 2005, lahko Komisija odloča o ustrezno ambiciozni stopnji politike o kakovosti zraka v Evropi, ki temelji na najboljših analizah, ki so na voljo.
The sixth environment action programme, adopted in 2002 by the Council and the European Parliament, asks the Commission to put policies in place to ensure good air quality by 2020.
Šesti okoljski akcijski program, ki sta ga Svet in Evropski parlament sprejela leta 2002, zahteva, da Komisija pripravi politike, ki bodo do leta 2020 zagotavljale dobro kakovost zraka.
The impact assessment looked at how to close the gap between the projections for 2020 if no further measures are taken, and the maximum improvement possible in 2020 if all technically feasible measures are applied.
Presoja vpliva je skušala zapreti vrzel med napovedmi za leto 2020 v primeru, da ne bi bili sprejeti nobeni nadaljnji ukrepi, in najboljšim možnim izboljšanjem stanja leta 2020, torej če se uporabijo vsi tehnično izvedljivi ukrepi.
It looked at costs and benefits of different scenarios and aimed to provide the most cost-effective solution for reaching the objectives chosen.
Pregledala je stroške in koristi različnih scenarijev in skušala poiskati čim bolj stroškovno učinkovito rešitev glede uresničevanja izbranih ciljev.
The detailed economic modelling done in the impact assessment showed that the benefits of further action clearly outweigh the costs.
Natančen gospodarski model, narejen v okviru presoje vpliva, je pokazal, da prednosti nadaljnjih ukrepov daleč prekašajo stroške.
The impact assessment also looked at simplifying and streamlining current air quality legislation, thus contributing to Better Regulation, by combining all
Presoja vpliva je skušala tudi poenostaviti in racionalizirati trenutno veljavno zakonodajo o kakovosti zraka ter tako prispevati k boljši pravni ureditvi, in sicer z združitvijo vseh obstoječih instrumentov v eno samo, prečiščeno direktivo o kakovosti zunanjega zraka.
Better Regulation — simply explained existing instruments in a single, consolidated ambient air quality directive.
Boljša pravna ureditev – preprosta razlaga
Has this new approach made any difference? erence?
Ali se je z novim pristopom kaj spremenilo?
e analysis of impacts has resulted in intentions being significantly adjusted in the course of preparation of proposals.
Posledica analize vplivov je, da se med pripravami predlogov nameni bistveno prilagajajo.
For example, the impact assessment on cross-bor-der management of copyright in the online music sector led to using a non-binding recommendation, rather than a directive.
Zaradi presoje vpliva čezmejnega upravljanja avtorskih pravic v spletnem glasbenem sektorju se na tem področju zdaj uporablja nezavezujoče priporočilo in ne direktiva.
In other areas, such as biomass and the urban environment, impact assessment has led to the conclusion that binding measures were not necessary.
Na drugih področjih, kot sta biomasa in mestno okolje, smo na podlagi presoje vpliva prišli do zaključka, da zavezujoči ukrepi niso potrebni.
The urban environment: European action?
Mestno okolje: evropski ukrep?
In the Green Paper,‘Towards a strategy for the urban environment’the suggestion was made to prepare two framework directives — one on environment management plans and systems and one on sustainable urban transport plans.
V Zeleni knjigi „K strategiji o mestnem okolju“ se je predlagala priprava dveh okvirnih direktiv – ene o načrtih in sistemih okoljskega upravljanja in ene o trajnostnih načrtih za mestne prevoze.
In the context of the impact assessment and consultations, these two actions were rejected by the Member States and most local authorities on subsidiarity grounds (i.e. the absolute necessity to take account of the local situation as well as the impossibility to impose a specific content of the plans EU-wide).
V okviru presoje vpliva in posvetovanj so države članice in večina lokalnih oblasti ta ukrepa zavrnile na podlagi subsidiarnosti (tj. nujno upoštevanje lokalnih razmer brez možnosti vsiljevanja določene vsebine načrtov, ki veljajo po vsej EU).
A non-binding approach was adopted for the thematic strategy on the urban environment.
Za tematsko strategijo o mestnem okolju je bil sprejet nezavezujoč pristop.
Reaching out — seeking the views of Europeans
Odprtost – upoštevanje mnenj državljanov Evrope
The revision of the television without frontiers directive involved lengthy stakeholder consultation.
Pregled Direktive o televiziji brez meja je vključeval dolgotrajna posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi.
A rst public consultation took place in 2003 and led to more than 150 written contributions.
Prvo javno posvetovanje je potekalo leta 2003 in pripeljalo do več kot 150 pisnih prispevkov.
This was followed by a policy paper from the Commission, expert focus groups and a second round of consultation with some 200 responses — drawn together in the Liverpool conference of September 2005.
Temu so sledili strateški dokument Komisije, srečanja skupin strokovnjakov in drugi krog posvetovanj s približno 200 odzivi, zaključke pa je povzela Liverpoolska konferenca septembra 2005.
The result was that all relevant parties (private and public broadcasters, ICT and telecoms operators, regulators, producers, rights holders) and most Member States had a real in uence on the evolution of policy.
Posledica tega je bila, da so vse zadevne strani (zasebne in javne TV postaje, IKT in telekomunikacijski operaterji, regulativni organi, producenti, imetniki avtorskih pravic) in večina držav članic zares vplivale na razvoj politike.
Extensive stakeholder consultation took place on each of the seven thematic strategies for the environment.
Obsežna posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi so se odvijala na področju vseh sedmih tematskih strategij za okolje.
For the air pollution strategy, over 100 meetings with experts were held, as well as an Internet consultation that attracted an unprecedented 11 000 comments.
Za strategijo o onesnaževanju zraka je bilo organiziranih več kot 100 srečanj s strokovnjaki in posvetovanje na medmrežju, ki je pritegnilo 11 000 komentarjev, kar se dotlej še ni zgodilo.
Reducing paperwork
Zmanjšanje obsega upravnih postopkov
Administrative costs are borne by companies, public authorities and citizens in complying with the rules. is can come from legal obligations to provide information, labelling, monitoring, reporting — if too high, these can start to offset the benefits of having put forward the policy in the first place.
Upravne stroške nosijo podjetja, javni organi in državljani, ki upoštevajo pravila. Izvirajo lahko iz pravnih obveznosti zagotovitve podatkov, označevanja, spremljanja, poročanja – toda če so obveznosti previsoke, lahko začnejo izpodrivati prednosti, zaradi katerih je bila politika sploh uvedena.
e Commission has started to pay particular attention to potential administrative costs and burdens resulting from EU law.
Komisija je začela posvečati posebno pozornost morebitnim upravnim stroškom in obremenitvam, ki so posledica zakonodaje EU.
Because European law often takes the form of a directive setting out broad principles, leaving the Member States to work out detailed implementation measures, it is not easy to measure possible administrative costs in advance. ese can vary from Member State to Member State, or even region to region, depending on the way in which the law is implemented.
Ker evropska zakonodaja pogosto določa široka načela v obliki direktiv in določitev natančnih izvedbenih ukrepov prepušča državam članicam, ni lahko predvideti morebitnih upravnih stroškov. Ti se lahko razlikujejo od ene države članice do druge ali celo od regije do regije, saj so odvisni od načina izvajanja zakona.
In doing so, it will identify the share of administrative costs which result from Community rules and Member State implementation.
Tako bo ugotovila delež upravnih stroškov, ki so posledica pravil Skupnosti in izvajanja s strani držav članic.
Calculating the cost of ‘red tape’
Izračun stroškov upravnih formalnosti
Before tabling its proposal on reforming regulation of the chemicals sector, REACH, the potential administrative costs of the proposal were analysed.
Pred predložitvijo predloga o reformi predpisov v sektorju kemikalij, REACH, je bila narejena analiza morebitnih upravnih stroškov predloga.
The impact assessment looked at: how many man-days were required at all stages — completion of forms for registration and authorisation, meetings to discuss risk measures etc.;the cost of each man-day, including overheads.
Presoja vpliva je raziskala: koliko dni na osebo je potrebnih na vseh stopnjah – za izpolnitev obrazcev za prijave in odobritve, srečanja, na katerih bi razpravljali o ukrepih tveganja, itd.stroške vsake posamezne osebe na dan, vključno z režijskimi stroški.
The result was a detailed picture of costs for different types of chemicals and different types of rms at every stage of the process.
Rezultat tega je bila natančna slika stroškov za različne vrste kemikalij in različne vrste podjetij na vsaki stopnji postopka.
As the body of EU law has developed progressively over the past 50 years, it has grown in complexity.
Ker je obseg evropske zakonodaje v preteklih petdesetih letih postopoma rasel, je ta postajala vse bolj zapletena.
So making a success of the simplification effort is a responsibility shared by all the European institutions.
Da bodo prizadevanja za poenostavitev uspešna, so torej odgovorne vse evropske institucije.
Cars: reducing regulatory build up?
Avtomobili: zmanjšanje kopičenja predpisov?
The CARS 21 high-level group examined legislation with a major impact on the competitiveness of the European automotive industry and has agreed on a number of recommendations which aim to enhance the industry’s global competitiveness and employment while sustaining further progress in safety and environmental performance at a price a ordable to the consumer.
Skupina na visoki ravni„CARS 21“ je pregledala zakonodajo z največjim vplivom na konkurenčnost evropske avtomobilske industrije in soglašala s številnimi priporočili, katerih cilj je okrepiti svetovno konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje v tej industriji in hkrati ohraniti nadaljnji napredek na področju varnosti in vplivov na okolje po ceni, ki je za potrošnika sprejemljiva.
The group recommended replacing 38 EC directives by international rules.
Skupina je predlagala zamenjavo 38 direktiv ES z mednarodnimi pravili.
In the case of 25 other directives, it proposed to let manufacturers use self or virtual testing for a number of car products.
V primeru 25 drugih direktiv je predlagala, da se proizvajalcem dovoli, da številne svoje izdelke sami testirajo ali opravijo virtualni test.
One directive was recommended for repeal.
Za eno direktivo se je predlagala razveljavitev.
The group also proposed a set of Better Regulation principles which should apply to the regulatory process in the automotive sector.
Skupina je predlagala tudi sklop načel za boljšo pravno ureditev, ki naj bi se uporabljali v ureditvenem postopku v avtomobilskem sektorju.
What can be dropped?
Kaj bi lahko izpustili?
Repealing laws
Razveljavitev zakonov
Responding to change
Odziv na spremembe
Sometimes, legislation needs repeal as circumstances change.
Včasih je treba zaradi sprememb okoliščin razveljaviti zakonodajo.
A directive to classify wood — defining the quality, the size of the knots and the diameter of wood in the rough — gradually became obsolete as the market evolved.
Direktiva o klasifikaciji lesa – ki določa kakovost, velikost grč in premer surovega debla – je z razvojem trga postopoma zastarela.
In 2005, the Commission reviewed all proposals pending before the Council and the European Parliament which had been adopted by the Commission prior to 2004 to make sure they were in line with current priorities and had been the subject of sufficiently rigorous impact assessment. e Commission decided that 67 pending proposals were no longer relevant and could be withdrawn.
Leta 2005 je Komisija pregledala vse predloge, ki so bili pred končno odobritvijo s strani Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta in jih je Komisija sprejela pred letom 2004, ter tako preverila, ali so usklajeni s trenutnimi prednostnimi nalogami in ali so bili med presojo vpliva dovolj temeljito pregledani. Komisija je sklenila, da 67 takih predlogov ni več pomembnih in se zato lahko umaknejo.
What can be done to make the laws more understandable and accessible?
Kaj lahko naredimo, da bodo zakoni razumljivejši in dostopnejši?
e EU is making important efforts to codify and, where necessary, recast its legislation.
EU si prizadeva za dosego pomembnega cilja – da kodificira in, če je potrebno, prenovi zakonodajo.
Codification means bringing all amendments to a given piece of law adopted at different times into one law — this will contribute to the reduction in volume of EU legislation, providing more readable and legally clear texts, and facilitating transparency and enforcement.
Kodificiranje pomeni združitev vseh sprememb določenega zakona, sprejetih tekom časa, v en zakon; to bo omogočilo zmanjšanje obsega zakonodaje EU, berljivejša in pravno jasnejša besedila ter večjo preglednost in boljše izvajanje.
In going over laws and their amendments, instances of incoherence and inconsistency can be exposed in single laws and between laws.
S pregledovanjem zakonov in njihovih sprememb se lahko pokažejo primeri neskladnosti in nedoslednosti v posameznih zakonih in med različnimi zakoni.
So, in addition to bringing all amendments into a consolidated text, it is sometimes necessary to revise the law. is process is referred to as recasting.
Zato je poleg združevanja vseh sprememb v prečiščeno besedilo včasih treba tudi pregledati zakon. Temu postopku pravimo prenavljanje.
Doing the same — but in a simpler way
Početi isto – a na preprostejši način
Codification of cosmetics rules allowed 45 different pieces of legislation to be brought within a single directive.
Kodificiranje pravil na področju kozmetičnih izdelkov je omogočilo, da je iz 45 različnih zakonov nastala ena sama direktiva.
This made the legislation far more manageable and accessible.
S tem je zakonodaja postala veliko bolj obvladljiva in dostopnejša.
Accessibility can also be improved in other ways. e new EUR-Lex website gives citizens access to the full range of EU law and treaties, as well as international agreements, parliamentary questions, case-law and much of the Official Journal.
Dostopnost se lahko izboljša tudi na druge načine. Nova spletna stran EUR-Lex državljanom nudi dostop do vseh zakonov in pogodb EU, mednarodnih sporazumov, parlamentarnih vprašanj, sodne prakse in večjega dela Uradnega lista.
Looking at alternatives ere are alternatives to regulation.
Za predpise so na voljo tudi druge možnosti.
Co-regulation (entrusting the achievement of the goals set out in law, for example to the social partners or to non-governmental organisations) and self-regulation (voluntary agreements between private bodies to solve problems by taking commitments between themselves) can be more cost efficient and effective ways to address certain policy objectives than the classic legal tools.
Koregulacija (prenos uresničevanja ciljev, določenih v zakonu, na primer na socialne partnerje ali nevladne organizacije) in samoregulacija (prostovoljni sporazumi med zasebniki za rešitev težav s prevzemanjem medsebojnih obveznosti) sta lahko stroškovno ugodnejša in učinkovitejša načina za dosego določenih ciljev politike kot običajna pravna sredstva.
New approach to standards — classic co-regulation
„Nov pristop“ k standardom – tipičen primer koregulacije
The‘new approach’directives, based on the standardisation of technical requirements by independent bodies, are an example of a well recognised ‘co-regulation’instrument. For many industrial and consumer products, the‘CE’ marking attests that a product has been certified and can be marketed in the EU.
Direktive„z novim pristopom“, ki temeljijo na standardizaciji tehničnih zahtev s strani neodvisnih teles, so primer dobro uveljavljenega instrumenta „koregulacije“.Pri mnogih industrijskih in potrošniških izdelkih oznaka„CE“ potrjuje, da ima izdelek certifikat in se lahko trži po vsej EU.
EU legislation only sets certification requirements and mandates private bodies.
Zakonodaja EU zgolj določa zahteve za pridobitev potrdil in pooblašča zasebnike.
Thousands of industrial products are regulated in this way.
Tako se ureja na tisoče industrijskih izdelkov.
Why is the same law applied in so many different ways?
Zakaj se isti zakon uporablja na toliko različnih načinov?
Can’t the same law be used throughout the EU?
Se ne bi mogel po vsej EU uporabljati isti zakon?
ere are different types of laws at European level.
Na evropski ravni obstajajo različne vrste zakonov.
Directives are converted into national law by the Member States. is allows the law to be adapted to national circumstances.
Države članice preoblikujejo direktive v državne zakone. Tako se lahko zakoni prilagodijo okoliščinam posamezne države.
Regulations, on the other hand, are directly applicable in each Member State. is means that exactly the same law is applied in each Member State.
Uredbe pa se uporabljajo neposredno v vseh državah članicah. To pomeni, da se v vseh državah članicah uporablja isti zakon.
Replacing directives with regulations can, under certain circumstances, offer simplification, as regulations enable immediate application, guarantee that all actors are subject to the same rules at the same time, and focus attention on the concrete enforcement of EU rules.
Zamenjava direktiv z uredbami lahko v določenih pogojih pripomore k poenostavitvi, saj uredbe, ki omogočajo takojšnjo uporabo, zagotavljajo, da se v določenem trenutku vsi akterji držijo istih pravil, in usmerjajo pozornost k dejanskemu uveljavljanju pravil EU.
Is enough attention paid to how the laws will be implemented in the Member States?
Ali se dovolj pozornosti posveča temu, kako bodo države članice izvajale zakone?
The correct implementation of European law is a high priority — it is the only way to ensure that policies are really working, changing the situation on the ground.
Pravilno izvajanje evropskih zakonov je pomembna prednostna naloga – samo tako se lahko zagotovi, da politike zares delujejo, da dejansko nekaj spremenijo.
The Commission is not only looking ahead by analysing future impacts, but it is also looking at the e ects of European policies on the ground.
Komisija z analiziranjem prihodnjih vplivov dela načrte za prihodnost, pa tudi proučuje učinke evropskih politik v praksi.
Where do we go from here?
Kam zdaj?
‘Better Regulation’ is a process.
Vendar pa Komisija sama ne more izboljšati samega zakonodajnega okolja.
It is one of the key priorities of the European Commission and it is making a major effort to improve the quality of existing legislation and to ensure a sound analytical base for taking decisions on future legislation. e Commission cannot, however, improve the regulatory environment on its own. e Council and the European Parliament need to play their part to ensure that quality legislation emerges at the end of the legislative process which is in line with the Better Regulation aspirations shared by all European institutions.
Tudi Svet in Evropski parlament morata narediti svoje, da bomo na koncu zakonodajnega postopka zagotovo dobili kakovostno zakonodajo, skladno s pričakovanji o programu boljše pravne ureditve, ki so skupna vsem evropskim institucijam.
Member States need to work in the same spirit when implementing EU actions.
Države članice morajo pri izvajanju ukrepov EU delovati v enakem duhu.
Acting in partnership
Partnersko sodelovanje
The European Parliament has been actively looking at how to improve policymaking and has adopted several reports in 2006 looking at various aspects of Better Regulation.
Evropski parlament aktivno proučuje, kako izboljšati oblikovanje politike, in je v letu 2006 sprejel že več poročil o različnih vidikih boljše pravne ureditve.
The Council of Ministers is equally keen to keep momentum high on Better Regulation, with successive presidencies (the Member State holding the chair of the Council for a six-month period and setting the agenda) announcing their intention to work on improving European law-making.
Svet ministrov prav tako vneto še naprej poudarja boljšo pravno ureditev, saj vsako naslednje predsedstvo (vsaka država članica šest mesecev predseduje Svetu in določa njegovo delo) napove, da si bo prizadevalo izboljšati postopek pripravljanja evropske zakonodaje.
Both the Council and the European Parliament have agreed to do impact assessments should they ask for substantial amendments to Commission proposals.
Svet in Evropski parlament sta se dogovorila, da bosta izvajala presoje vpliva, če bosta zahtevala večje spremembe predlogov Komisije.
The Member States have an essential role to play in Better Regulation as they are responsible for applying and, in the case of directives, transposing EU legislation at national level.
Države članice imajo pri boljši pravni ureditvi pomembno vlogo, saj so odgovorne za uporabo zakonodaje EU in v primeru direktiv za prenos le-te na državno raven.
Delivery on Better Regulation therefore relies largely on their e orts.
Boljša pravna ureditev je zato odvisna predvsem od njihovih prizadevanj.
More generally, most Member States are actively looking at ways to reduce red tape and to more fully analyse impacts of laws and regulations.
Oziroma splošneje, večina držav članic aktivno išče načine, kako zmanjšati odvečno birokracijo in temeljiteje proučiti vplive zakonov in predpisov.
Better Regulation also has a strong external dimension.
Boljša pravna ureditev ima tudi zelo močno zunanjo razsežnost.
In a global market place, rules developed elsewhere impact on European business and rules applied in other markets can have implications for imported products and services in Europe.
Na svetovnem tržišču pravila, ki jih razvijejo drugje, vplivajo na evropski poslovni svet, pravila, ki veljajo na drugih tržiščih, pa lahko vplivajo na uvožene izdelke in storitve v Evropi.
International cooperation and dialogue is essential — not only to provide high levels of consumer, social and environmental protection — but also from a business perspective.
Mednarodno sodelovanje in dialog sta bistvenega pomena – ne le za zagotavljanje visokih ravni varovanja potrošnikov, družbe in okolja, ampak tudi s poslovnega vidika.
Just as the drive to create the single market in Europe was fuelled in part by the desire of business to eliminate unnecessary small differences in regulations between Member States, international regulatory cooperation is motivated by the desire to reduce and eliminate unnecessary red tape between trading partners.
Tako kot je težnjo po vzpostavitvi enotnega evropskega trga deloma gnala želja poslovnega sveta, da se med državami članicami odstranijo nepotrebne drobne razlike v predpisih, tako mednarodno sodelovanje na področju zakonodaje spodbuja želja, da se zmanjša in odpravi odvečna birokracija med trgovinskimi partnerji.
Sharing experience
Izmenjava izkušenj