natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005, amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement (OJ 2005 L 257, p. 127).
Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Nesprejetje, v predpisanem roku, predpisov, potrebnih za uskladitev z Direktivo Komisije 2005/51/ES z dne 7. septembra 2005 o spremembi Priloge XX k Direktivi 2004/17/ES in Priloge VIII k Direktivi 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o javnih naročilih (UL L 257, str. 127).
Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/51/EC of 7 September 2005, amending Annex XX to Directive 2004/17/EC and Annex VIII to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on public procurement, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;
Veliko vojvodstvo Luksemburg, s tem da ni sprejelo zakonov in drugih predpisov za uskladitev z Direktivo Komisije 2005/51/ES z dne 7. septembra 2005 o spremembi Priloge XX k Direktivi 2004/17/ES in Priloge VIII k Direktivi 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o javnih naročilih, ni izpolnilo obveznosti iz te direktive.
Appeals — Grounds — Admissibility — Examination by the Court of its own motion (see para. 38)
Pritožba – Pritožbeni razlogi – Dopustnost – Preizkus, ki ga Sodišče opravi po uradni dolžnosti (Glej točko 38.)
Appeals — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance — Error of law relied on not identified — Inadmissible (Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 40, 88)
Pritožba – Pritožbeni razlogi – Tožbeni razlogi in trditve, predstavljeni pred Sodiščem prve stopnje, ki jih je stranka samo ponovila – Neopredelitev navedene napačne uporabe prava – Nedopustnost (člen 225 ES; Statut Sodišča, člen 58, prvi odstavek; Poslovnik Sodišča, člen 112(1)(c)) (Glej točki 40 in 88.)
Officials — Actions — Interest in bringing proceedings — Actions for annulment brought against an appointment by an applicant who could not himself be appointed — Inadmissible (Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 90 and 91) (see paras 45, 46)
Uradniki – Tožba – Procesno upravičenje – Ničnostna tožba zoper zaposlitev, ki jo je vložila tožnica, ki je ni mogoče zaposliti – Nedopustnost (Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike, člena 90 in 91) (Glej točki 45 in 46.)
Officials — Decision adversely affecting an official — Rejection of candidature — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Regularisation of a lack of reasoning during the procedure before the Court — Conditions (Art. 253 EC; Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 25, second para., and 90(2)) (see paras 50-52, 57-59, 95)
Uradniki – Odločba, ki posega v položaj – Zavrnitev prijave – Obveznost obrazložitve – Poprava nezadostne obrazložitve med pravdnim postopkom – Pogoji (člen 253 ES; Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike, člena 25, drugi odstavek, in 90(2)) (Glej točke od 50 do 52, od 57 do 59 in 95.)
Officials — Contract staff — Recruitment — Assessment of the suitability of candidates — Discretion of the Selection Board — Judicial review —
Uradniki – Pogodbeni uslužbenci – Zaposlovanje – Ocena sposobnosti kandidatov – Prosta presoja izbirne komisije – Sodni nadzor – Meje (Kadrovski predpisi za uradnike, priloga III; Pogoji za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev, člen 82) (Glej točko 82.)
Officials — Actions — Actions for damages — Annulment of the illegal act in dispute — Sufficient compensation (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 91) (see paras 96-98)
Sodba Sodi�ča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti z dne 14. novembra 2006 v zadevi Neirinck proti Komisiji (T-494/04) se razveljavi v delu, v katerem je Sodi�če prve stopnje zavrnilo tožbeni razlog v zvezi s kr�itvijo obveznosti obrazložitve v odločbi Komisije Evropskih skupnosti z dne 27. aprila 2004, s katero je bila W.
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 14 November 2006 in Case T-494/04 Neirinck v Commission dismissing the application of the appellant seeking (i) annulment of the Commission’s decisions rejecting her candidature for the post of lawyer in the Buildings Policy sector of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Brussels (OIB) and appointing another applicant to that post and (ii) an award of damages — Concept of interest in bringing proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Misuse of powers — Interests of the service, principle of the administration’s duty to have regard for the interests of officials and the principle of sound administration.
Odločba Komisije Evropskih skupnosti z dne 27. aprila 2004, s katero je bila W. Neirinck obve�čena o neuspehu na ustnem preizkusu v postopku zaposlovanja za mesto pravnika kot začasnega uslužbenca v Sektorju nepremičninske politike v Uradu za infrastrukturo in logistiko v Bruslju, se razglasi za nično.
Annuls the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 14 November 2006 in Case T 494/04 Neirinck v Commission in so far as the Court dismissed the plea in law alleging that an infringement of the obligation to state reasons vitiated the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 27 April 2004 informing Mrs Neirinck that she had failed the oral examination within the recruitment procedure for the post of lawyer in the Buildings Policy sector of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Brussels, as a member of the contract staff;
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti nosi poleg svojih stro�kov tudi vse stro�ke, ki jih je W. Neirinck priglasila pri Sodi�ču Evropskih skupnosti in pri Sodi�ču prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti.
Annuls the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 27 April 2004 informing Mrs Neirinck that she had failed the oral examination within the recruitment procedure for the post of lawyer in the Buildings Policy sector of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Brussels, as a member of contract staff;
Izdaja začasne odredbe – Odlog izvršitve – Odlog izvršitve Uredbe št. 809/2007 o opredelitvi pojma viseča mreža, ki lahko povzroči dokončno opustitev ribolova z napravo za lovljenje tune – Pogoji za dodelitev – Nujnost – Resna in nepopravljiva škoda – Finančna škoda (člen 242 ES; Uredba Sveta št. 809/2007) (Glej točke 24, 25 in od 28 do 31.)
Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
Ničnostna tožba – Razglasitev ničnosti Uredbe Sveta (ES) �t.
Order of the President of the Court of 28 February 2008 — France v Council
809/2007 z dne 28. junija 2007 o spremembi uredb (ES) �t. 894/97, (ES) �t. 812/2004 in (ES) �t.
Applications for interim measures — Suspension of operation of a measure — Conditions for granting — Prima facie case — Urgency — Serious and irreparable damage — Cumulative nature — Weighing-up of all the interests at stake (Art. 242 EC) (see paras 16, 17)
2187/2005 glede visečih mrež (UL L 182, str.1) – Izraz „zabodna viseča mreža“ – Vključitev stabilno nastavljenih mrež, kot je naprava za lovljenje tun (thonaille), v ta pojem – Nespo�tovanje obveznosti obrazložitve in kr�itev načel sorazmernosti in prepovedi diskriminacije.
Reserves the costs.
Odločitev o stro�kih se pridrži.
Report 2008-2
Zvezek 2008 – 2
Catalogue number: QD-AB-08-002-EN-C
Katalo�ka �tevilka: QD-AB-08-002-SL-C
Annual volume price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg: EUR 300
Cena za lentik (brez DDV) v Luksemburgu: 300 EUR
Catalogue number: QD-AB-08-003-EN-C
Katalo�ka �tevilka: QD-AB-08-003-SL-C
These Reports are published, pursuant to the Rules of the Court of Justice and in accordance with the rules on the languages to be used in the Communities, in the official languages,1namely, Bulgarian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian,
Ta zbirka odločb je na podlagi Poslovnika Sodi�ča in v skladu z jezikovno ureditvijo Skupnosti objavljena v uradnih jezikih1, in sicer bolgar�čini, �pan�čini, če�čini,
Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish, the language of each case being specified.
Brezplačne publikacije: na spletni strani EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); dan�čini, nem�čini, eston�čini, gr�čini, angle�čini, franco�čini, italijan�čini, latvij�čini, litov�čini, madžar�čini, malte�čini, nizozem�čini, polj�čini, portugal�čini, romun�čini, slova�čini, sloven�čini, fin�čini in �ved�čini, za vsako zadevo pa je naveden jezik postopka.
— judgments in cases other than references for a preliminary ruling delivered by Chambers of five Judges where the Advocate General does not give an Opinion,
– sodbe senatov treh sodnikov, razen v postopkih predhodnega odločanja,– sodbe senatov petih sodnikov, razen v postopkih predhodnega odločanja, kadar odločajo brez sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca,– sklepi.
You can obtain their contact details on the internet (http://ec.europa.eu) or by sending a faxto +352 2929-42758.
Plačljive naročnine (na primer na Uradni list Evropske unije ali zbirke odločb sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije):
From volume 2006-1, the Reports will include a section containing details of unpublished decisions (pages numbered I-1*, I-2*, etc.).
Zbirka odločb od zvezka 2006 – 1 obsega del s podatki o neobjavljenih odločbah (strani, o�tevilčene I-1*, I-2* itd.).
NOTE ON THE CITATION OF ARTICLES OF THE TREATIES IN THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE ANDTHE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
POJASNILO O NAVAJANJU ČLENOV POGODB V BESEDILIH SODIŠČA IN SODIŠČA PRVE STOPNJE
— Comprehensive lists setting out the new method of citation of the articles of the EC Treaty and of the articles of the Treaty on European Union as they stood before 1 May 1999 are published in Sections I and II of the European Court Reports for May 1999.
• Popolni seznami, ki povzemajo navajanje členov Pogodbe ES in členov Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, kot so veljali pred 1. majem 1999, so navedeni v Recueil I in II za maj 1999.
— Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them: judgment of 13 March 2008 (Commission v Infront WM, C-125/06 P) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
– Usklajevanje zakonodaj – Prometni davek – Skupni sistem davka na dodano vrednost – Odbitek vstopnega davka: sodba z dne 6. marca 2008 (Nordania Finans in BG Factoring, C-98/07) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— Common agricultural policy — Integrated administration and control system for certain aid schemes: judgment of 11 March 2008 (Jager, C-420/06) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
– Strukturne intervencije – Financiranje Skupnosti: sodba z dne 13. marca 2008 (Vereniging Nationaal Overlegorgaan Sociale Werkvoorziening, od C-383/06 do C-385/06) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— Common agricultural policy — Structural reform — Improving the efficiency of agricultural structures: judgment of 13 March 2008 (Valvo, C-78/07) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
– Skupna kmetijska politika – Reforma struktur – Izbolj�anje učinkovitosti kmetijskih struktur: sodba z dne 13. marca 2008 (Valvo, C-78/07) . . . . .
— Common organisation of the markets — Export refunds: judgment of 13 March 2008 (Viamex Agrar Handel, C-96/06) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
– Skupna ureditev trgov – Izvozna nadomestila: sodba z dne 13. marca 2008 (Viamex Agrar Handel, C-96/06) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— Common organisation of the markets — Export refunds — Conditions for granting: judgment of 13 March 2008 (Viamex Agrar Handel, C-96/06) . .
– Skupna ureditev trgov – Izvozna nadomestila – Pogoji za podelitev: sodba z dne 13. marca 2008 (Viamex Agrar Handel, C-96/06) . . . . . . . . . . .
— Electronic communications networks and services — Regulatory framework — Directive 2002/21: judgment of 6 March 2008 (Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones, C-82/07) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
– Fizične ali pravne osebe – Akti, ki jih neposredno in posamično zadevajo: sodba z dne 13. marca 2008 (Komisija proti Infront WM, C-125/06 P) . . .
— Principles — Principle of retroactive application of the more lenient penalty: judgment of 11 March 2008 (Jager, C-420/06) . . . . . . . . . . .
– Načela – Načelo retroaktivne uporabe milej�e kazni: sodba z dne 11. marca 2008 (Jager, C-420/06) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Economic and social cohesion
Približevanje zakonodaj
— Structural assistance — Community financing: judgment of 13 March 2008 (Vereniging Nationaal Overlegorgaan Sociale Werkvoorziening and Others, C-383/06 to C-385/06) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
– Elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve – Regulativni okvir – Direktiva 2002/21: sodba z dne 6. marca 2008 (Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones, C-82/07) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
— Community postal services — Directive 97/67 — Services reserved to universal postal service providers: judgment of 6 March 2008 (Deutsche Post and Others, C-287/06 to C-292/06) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
– Po�tne storitve v Skupnosti – Direktiva 97/67 – Storitve, pridržane izvajalcu univerzalne po�tne storitve: sodba z dne 6. marca 2008 (Deutsche Post in drugi, od C-287/06 do C-292/06) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Joined Cases C-287/06 to C-292/06
Združene zadeve od C-287/06 do C-292/06
(Postal services — Directive 97/67/EC — Field reserved to universal postal service provider — Special tariffs for the deposit by business customers, at fixed points of the postal network, of minimum quantities of presorted items — Refusal of such tariffs to intermediaries who consolidate, on a commercial basis and in their own name, postal items from various senders)
„Po�tne storitve – Direktiva 97/67/ES – Področje, pridržano izvajalcu univerzalne po�tne storitve – Posebne tarife za poslovne stranke, ki na določene točke po�tnega omrežja dostavijo minimalne količine že sortiranih po�iljk – Zavrnitev takih tarif združevalcem po�te, ki poslovno in v svojem imenu zbirajo po�iljke več po�iljateljev“
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 6 March 2008
Sodba Sodi�ča (prvi senat) z dne 6. marca 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Freedom to provide services — Community postal services — Directive 97/67 — Services reserved to universal postal service providers
Prosto opravljanje storitev – Poštne storitve v Skupnosti – Direktiva 97/67 – Storitve, pridržane izvajalcu univerzalne poštne storitve
(European Parliament and Council Directive 97/67, Art. 12, fifth indent)
(Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/67, člen 12, peta alinea)
SUMMARY — JOINED CASES C-287/06 TO C-292/06 which may be reserved to the universal postal service provider under Article 7(1) of Directive 97/67, with the consequence that that provision cannot be relied upon to justify treatment of the intermediaries concerned which is different from that enjoyed by the business customers of that company.
POVZETEK – ZDRUŽENE ZADEVE OD C-287/06 DO C-292/06 dostopa, kot so po�tni centri, ne sodi na področje, ki bi lahko bilo izvajalcu univerzalne po�tne storitve pridržano na podlagi člena 7(1) Direktive 97/67, tako da se ni mogoče sklicevati na to določbo za utemeljitev, da se zadevne združevalce obravnava drugače kot poslovne stranke navedene družbe.
The fifth indent of Article 12 of Directive 97/67 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service, as amended by Directive 2002/39, which imposes on Member States the obligation to take steps to ensure that the tariffs for each of the services forming part of the provision of the universal service comply with the principles of transparency and non-discrimination, and provides that those tariffs are, together with the associated conditions, to apply equally both as between different third parties and as between third parties and universal service providers supplying equivalent services, must be interpreted as precluding refusal to apply to businesses which consolidate, on a commercial basis and in their own name, postal items from various senders the special tariffs which the national universal postal service provider grants, within the scope of its exclusive licence, to business customers for the deposit of minimum quantities of presorted mail at its sorting offices.
Poleg tega, čeprav je res, da cilj člena 12, peta alinea, navedene direktive ni urediti načelno vpra�anje, ali mora izvajalec univerzalnih po�tnih storitev odobriti dostop do po�tne verige pod drugačnimi pogoji in na drugačnih točkah v primerjavi s standardno po�tno storitvijo ali ne, pa, kot izhaja iz navedene določbe, ta državam članicam nalaga strogo obveznost, da spo�tujejo načeli preglednosti in nediskriminacije, če ta izvajalec dejansko odobri tak dostop do posebnih tarif.
Moreover, while it is true that the fifth indent of Article 12 of that directive is not intended to determine the question of principle whether a universal postal service provider is or is not obliged to grant access to the postal chain under conditions and at points different from those which apply to the traditional service for letter post, it nevertheless follows from the wording of that provision that it imposes on the Member States a strict obligation to apply the principles of transparency and non-discrimination where such access to special tariffs is in fact granted by that provider.
Člen 12, peta alinea, Direktive 97/67 o skupnih pravilih za razvoj notranjega trga po�tnih storitev v Skupnosti in za izbolj�anje kakovosti storitve, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2002/39, ki obvezuje države članice, da sprejmejo ukrepe za zagotovitev, da so tarife za vsako storitev, ki je del izvajanja univerzalne storitve, v skladu z načeli preglednosti in nediskriminacije in določa, da morajo tarife upo�tevati stro�ke, do katerih ni pri�lo v primerjavi s standardnimi storitvami, ki zajemajo celotno ponudbo za sprejem, prevoz, usmerjanje in dostavo posameznih po�tnih po�iljk in se skupaj s povezanimi pogoji enako uporabljajo tako med različnimi tretjimi strankami kot med tretjimi strankami in izvajalci univerzalnih storitev, ki opravljajo podobne storitve, je treba razlagati tako, da nasprotuje temu, da se podjetjem, ki poslovno in v svojem imenu zbirajo po�tne po�iljke več po�iljateljev, zavrne ugodnost posebnih tarif, ki jih nacionalni ponudnik univerzalnih po�tnih storitev na področju svoje izključne licence odobri poslovnim strankam za dostavo minimalnih količin predsortiranih po�iljk v njegove po�tne centre.
An activity such as the collection by intermediaries at the premises of various senders of postal items, their pre-sorting and transport to access points does not fall within the field
Dejavnost, kot je zbiranje po�tnih po�iljk različnih po�iljateljev prek združevalcev, njihovo predsortiranje in prevoz do točk
(see paras 27, 28, 31, 35, 41, 44, operative part)
(Glej točke 27, 28, 31, 35, 41, 44 in izrek.)
6 March 2008 *
SODBA SODIŠČA (prvi senat) z dne 6. marca 2008 *
REFERENCES for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln (Germany), made by decision of 28 April 2006, received at the Court on 3 July 2006, in the proceedings
V združenih zadevah od C-287/06 do C-292/06, katerih predmet so predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe na podlagi člena 234 ES, ki jih je vložilo Verwaltungsgericht Köln (Nemčija), z odločbami z dne 28. aprila 2006, ki so na Sodi�če prispele 3. julija 2006, v postopkih
JUDGMENT OF 6. 3.
SODBA Z DNE 6. 3.
2008 — JOINED CASES C-287/06 TO C-292/06 intervening parties:
2008 – ZADEVE OD C-287/06 DO C-292/06 ob udeležbi:
Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro, Registrar: B. Fülöp, Administrator, having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 13 September 2007,
Poiares Maduro, sodni tajnik: B. Fülöp, administrator, na podlagi pisnega postopka in obravnave z dne 13. septembra 2007,
DEUTSCHE POST AND OTHERS after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
DEUTSCHE POST IN DRUGI ob upo�tevanju stali�č, ki so jih predložili:
2008 — JOINED CASES C-287/06 TO C-292/06 gives the following
2008 – ZADEVE OD C-287/06 DO C-292/06 izreka naslednjo
These references for a preliminary ruling concern the interpretation of Articles 47(2) EC and 95 EC, and of Article 7(1) and the fifth indent of Article 12 of Directive 97/67/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (OJ 1998 L 15, p. 14), as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 June 2002 (OJ L 176, p.
Predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�ajo na razlago členov 47(2) ES in 95 ES ter členov 7(1) in 12, peta alinea, Direktive 97/67/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. decembra 1997 o skupnih pravilih za razvoj notranjega trga po�tnih storitev v Skupnosti in za izbolj�anje kakovosti storitve, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/39/ES z dne 10. junija 2002 (UL L 176, str.
21; ‘Directive 97/67’).
21, v nadaljevanju: Direktiva 97/67).
The references were made in the ontext of proceedings between, first, Deutsche Post AG (‘Deutsche Post’), as provider of the universal postal service in Germany, and, second, Magdeburger Dienstleistungs- und Verwaltungs GmbH (MDG), Marketing Service Magdeburg GmbH and Vedat Deniz (‘the intermediaries concerned’), on the one hand, and the Bundesrepublik Deutschland, on the other hand, concerning decisions of the Bundesnetzagentur (Federal Network Agency; ‘BNA’) relating to the grant and conditions of access of those intermediaries to the partial services of the Deutsche Post postal network.
Ti predlogi so bili vloženi v okviru sporov med Deutsche Post AG (v nadaljevanju: Deutsche Post) kot izvajalko univerzalne po�tne storitve v Nemčiji in na drugi strani Magdeburger Dienstleistungs- und Verwaltungs GmbH (MDG), Marketing Service Magdeburg GmbH in Vedat Deniz (v nadaljevanju: zadevni združevalci) ter Zvezno republiko Nemčijo glede odločb Bundesnetzagentur (zvezne agencije za omrežje, v nadaljevanju: BNA) o dodelitvi dostopa navedenim združevalcem do delnih storitev Deutsche Post v njenem po�tnem omrežju in pogojih zanj.
Directive 97/67 initiated the process of gradual liberalisation of the market in postal services.
Direktiva 97/67/ES je uveljavila postopek postopne liberalizacije trga po�tnih storitev.
According to recital 2 in the preamble to Directive 2002/39, Directive 97/67 ‘established a regulatory framework for the postal sector at Community level, including measures to guarantee a universal service and the setting of maximum limits for the postal services which Member States may reserve to their universal service provider(s) with a view to the maintenance of the universal service, and a timetable for decision-making on the further opening of the market to competition, for the purposes of creating a single market in postal services’.
V skladu z določili uvodne izjave 2 Direktive 2002/39 je Direktiva 97/67 „vzpostavila regulativni okvir po�tnega sektorja na ravni Skupnosti, vključno z ukrepi za zagotovitev univerzalnih storitev in določitev zgornjih meja za po�tne storitve, ki jih lahko države članice rezervirajo za svojega (svoje) izvajalca(e) univerzalnih storitev z namenom ohranitve univerzalne storitve, in časovni razpored za odločanje o nadaljnjem odpiranju trga konkurenci za potrebe oblikovanja enotnega trga po�tnih storitev“.