natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
contribute to the social and economic aims of the Community development cooperation policy, it is necessary, having regard to the content and purpose of that measure, to seek its main aim in order to secure a balance between the observance of Article 47 EU and of Article 5 EC.
bi ukrep sodil med cilje SZVP in prav tako prispeval k uresničitvi socialnogospodarskih ciljev skupnostne razvojne politike, je treba glede na vsebino in namen tega ukrepa poiskati njegov glavni cilj.
It would be erroneous and excessive to consider that any measure which fosters the economic and social development of a developing country falls within the competence of the Community pursuant to Title XX of the EC Treaty.
Bilo bi namreč napačno in pretirano, če bi menili, da vsak ukrep, ki spodbuja gospodarski in socialni razvoj države v razvoju, sodi v pristojnost Skupnosti na podlagi Naslova XX Pogodbe ES.
That approach was taken by the Court in Case C-176/03 Commission v Council, in which, it will be recalled, the Court annulled Articles 2 to 7 of Framework Decision 2003/80/JHA although they entailed partial harmonisation of the criminal laws of the Member States 73 in so far as an examination of their aim and content had shown that they had ‘as their main purpose the protection of the environment’. 74
Ta pristop je sprejelo Sodi�če v zgoraj navedeni sodbi z dne 13. septembra 2005, s katero je, moramo opozoriti, med drugim razveljavilo člene od 2 do 7 okvirnega sklepa 2003/80/PNZ, čeprav so se nana�ali na delno uskladitev kazenskih zakonodaj držav članic 73, saj se je pri obravnavi njihovega namena in vsebine izkazalo, da „je bil njihov glavni namen varstvo okolja“ 74.
Any other interpretation would undoubtedly deprive the other Community policies, such as the common commercial policy, of their reason for existence and render them ineffective.
Drugačna razlaga bi drugim skupnostnim politikam, kot je skupna gospodarska politika, nedvomno odvzela njihov ratio in učinkovitost 72.
72It would also be likely to harm the practical effect of the provisions of Title V of the EU Treaty, in spite of the limits on the actions of the Community laid down by Article 5 EC.
Prav tako bi lahko �kodila polnemu učinku določb Naslova V pogodbe EU, kljub omejitvam, ki so za ukrepe Skupnosti določeni v členu 5 ES.
Where a measure is likely to fall within the scope of the aims of the CFSP and also to
Za zagotovitev ravnovesja med spo�tovanjem člena 47 EU in člena 5 ES, kadar naj
Reading Articles 47 EU and 5 EC in conjunction must also lead to the conclusion that, if a European Union action pursues the main aim of preserving peace and strengthening international security (and a fortiori if that is the exclusive aim) while at the same time contributing indirectly to the social and economic development of developing coun-
Skupna razlaga povezanih členov 47 EU in 5 ES mora prav tako pripeljati do ugotovitve, da je poseganje v pristojnosti Skupnosti, če ukrep Evropske unije prvenstveno zasleduje (seveda a fortiori to velja za izključno zasledovanje) cilj ohranitve miru in krepitve mednarodne varnosti, medtem ko istočasno posredno prispeva k socialno-
72 — Before the Community was formally given its own competence for development, the Court found, with regard to the application of the system of general tariff preferences on certain products from developing countries, that although that system reflected a new concept of international trade relations in which development aims played a major role, the ‘link with development problems’ did not cause a measure to be excluded from the sphere of the common commercial policy: see Case 45/86 Commission v Council [1987] ECR 1493, paragraphs 18 and 20.
72 – Preden je Skupnost formalno dobila lastno pristojnost na področju razvoja, je Sodi�če glede uporabe sheme splo�nih tarifnih preferencialov za določene proizvode, ki izvirajo iz držav v razvoju, odločilo, da čeprav je ta shema odražala novo pojmovanje trgovinskih odnosov, v katerih imajo razvojni cilji pomembno vlogo, „povezava z razvojnimi problemi“ ni pripeljala do tega, da bi bil akt izključen s področja skupne trgovinske politike: glej sodbo z dne 26. marca 1987 v zadevi Komisija proti Svetu (45/86, Recueil, str. 1493, točki 18 in 20).
73 — Paragraph 47.74 — Idem, paragraph 51 (italics added).
73 – Zgoraj navedena sodba (točka 47).74 – Ibidem (točka 51) (moj poudarek).
COMMISSION v COUNCIL tries, any encroachment on the Community’s competences is precluded.
KOMISIJA PROTI SVETU gospodarskemu razvoju držav v razvoju, izključeno.
(iii) Combating the proliferation of small arms and light weapons and development cooperation
iii) Dejavnost proti �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra ter razvojno sodelovanje
The foregoing assessments show that combating the proliferation of small arms and light weapons cannot be totally excluded from the scope of the Community policy on development cooperation.
Navedene presoje kažejo, da dejavnosti proti �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra ni mogoče v celoti izključiti s področja uporabe skupnostne politike razvojnega sodelovanja.
On the other hand, if the two aims of the measure are indissociably linked, without one being secondary and indirect in relation to the other, 75 the special nature of the relationship between the European Union and the Community should lead to priority being given to the Community legal basis because, in the context of that relationship, it seems to me particularly difficult, if not impossible as the law of the European Union stands at present, to contemplate recourse to a dual legal basis without breaching Article 47 EU. 76
Po drugi strani bi morala, če sta dva cilja ukrepa nerazdružljivo povezana, pri čemer noben ni podreden in posreden glede na drugega 75, posebna narava odnosov med Evropsko unijo in Skupnostjo pripeljati do tega, da bi se dala prednost pravni podlagi Skupnosti, pri čemer se mi zdi, da si je v trenutnem stanju prava Evropske unije v okviru teh odnosov zlasti težko, če ne celo nemogoče, predstavljati sklicevanje na dvojno pravno podlago, ne da bi bila podana kr�itev člena 47 EU 76.
75 — According to the criterion developed by the Court’s caselaw, see Case C-178/03 Commission v Parliament and Council [2006] ECR I-107, paragraphs 42 and 43 and the caselaw cited.
75 – Na podlagi merila iz sodne prakse Sodi�ča: glej v tem smislu sodbo z dne 10. januarja 2006 v zadevi Komisija proti Parlamentu in Svetu (C-178/03, ZOdl., str. I-107, točki 42 in 43, in navedena sodna praksa).
That subject, like combating drugs and mine clearance, is not in principle excluded from the area of unilateral measures or agreements concluded by the Community with third countries concerning development cooperation, provided that the actions which are being carried out or are envisaged have development cooperation as their main aim by contributing to attaining the social and economic objectives of that policy.
To področje namreč, tako kot boj proti drogam in odstranjevanje min, ni a priori izključeno s področja enostranskih ukrepov ali sporazumov, ki jih Skupnost sklepa s tretjimi državami na področju razvojnega sodelovanja, če je glavni namen izvedenih ali predvidenih ukrepov razvojno sodelovanje, s tem da prispevajo k uresničitvi socialnogospodarskih ciljev te politike.
76 — It should be borne in mind that, in the context of the EC Treaty, recourse to a dual legal basis is exceptional and is precluded where, although the aims of the act in question are inseparably connected, the procedures laid down for one or the other of the legal bases are incompatible and/or where the use of two legal bases is liable to undermine the rights of the Parliament: see Commission v Parliament and Council, paragraph 57 and caselaw cited.
76 – Poudariti je treba, da je v okviru Pogodbe ES sklicevanje na dvojno pravno podlago izjemno in je izključeno, kadar so kljub nerazdružljivi naravi ciljev, ki jih zasleduje zadevni akt, postopki, predvideni za eno ali drugo pravno podlago, neskladni in/ali kadar lahko uporaba več pravnih podlag �kodi pravicam Parlamenta: glej zgoraj navedeno sodbo Komisija proti Parlamentu in Svetu (točka 57 in navedena sodna praksa).
In a case concerning the distribution of competences between the second and the first pillars of the European Union, the use of two legal bases would also appear impossible in view of the different procedural requirements laid down in the framework of Title V of the EU Treaty and in that of Title XX of the EC Treaty.
V zadevi, ki se nana�a delitev pristojnosti med drugim in prvim stebrom Evropske unije, se zdi uporaba dveh pravnih podlag prav tako nemogoča glede na različne postopkovne zahteve, postavljene v okviru naslova V Pogodbe EU in Naslova XX Pogodbe ES.
Accordingly, whereas a joint action pursuing a CFSP objective is, in principle, adopted solely by the Council acting unanimously (subject to the application of Article 23(2) EU), in the matter of development cooperation Article 179(1) EC provides that ‘the mea- sures necessary to further the objectives referred to in Article 177 [EC]’ are to be adopted by the Council acting in accordance with the so-called co-decision procedure.
Medtem ko skupni ukrep, ki zasleduje cilj SZVP, načeloma sprejme Svet s soglasjem (s pridržkom uporabe člena 23(2) EU), po drugi strani na področju razvojnega sodelovanja člen 179(1) ES določa, da „ukrepe, ki so potrebni za uresničevanje ciljev iz člena 177 [ES]“ sprejme Svet v skladu s t. i. postopkom soodločanja.
Likewise it is also doubtful whether the procedures for adopting decisions granting financial and/or technical support and based on acts of a general nature in one or the other pillar can be reconciled, because in the context of Title V of the EU Treaty competence for adopting such decisions falls to the Council, whereas in the context of development cooperation it will be for the Commission to adopt measures of financial and/or technical support.
Prav tako lahko dvomimo, da je mogoče postopke, na podlagi katerih se sprejemajo odločitve, s katerimi se dodeljuje finančna in/ali tehnična pomoč in temeljijo na splo�nih aktih enega ali drugega stebra, uskladiti, ker je v okviru Naslova V Pogodbe EU za sprejetje takih odločitev pristojen Svet, medtem ko Komisija sprejema ukrepe finančne in/ali tehnične pomoči.
I think that reasoning is borne out by the initiatives of the institutions of the European Union for preventing the proliferation of small arms and light weapons.
Zdi se mi, da je ta analiza nastala zaradi pobud institucij Evropske unije glede dejavnosti proti lahkemu orožju in orožju malega kalibra.
During the period of the cold war many States accumulated very considerable stocks of conventional weapons which, when the cold war ended, and for various reasons connected in particular with the collapse of state structures, fuelled the principal armed conflicts of the 1990s. 77
Med hladno vojno so �tevilne države nakopičile zelo velike zaloge konvencionalnega orožja, ki je po koncu hladne vojne in zaradi različnih razlogov, povezanih zlasti z razpadom državnih struktur, služilo oboroženim spopadom v devetdesetih letih prej�njega stoletja 77.
1997 Programme, which was in response to several resolutions adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations, 79 comprised an internal section addressed to the Member States, which were to intensify their collective efforts to prevent and combat illegal trafficking of arms in their territory 80and an external section announcing that the Community and the Member States would, within the limits of their respective competence, take concerted action to assist other countries to prevent trafficking of arms and, especially in ‘post-conflict’ situations and in situations where a minimal degree of security and stability existed, in suppressing the illegal circulation and trafficking of arms.
tej trgovini“ 78(v nadaljevanju: program iz leta 1997). Program iz leta 1997, ki je ustrezal �tevilnim resolucijam, ki jih je sprejela Generalna skup�čina Združenih narodov 79, je vseboval notranji del, naslovljen na države članice, ki so morale okrepiti skupna prizadevanja, da bi preprečile trgovino s tem orožjem na njihovem ozemlju in delovale zoper njo 80, in zunanji del, ki med drugim določa, da naj bi Skupnost in države članice, v mejah pristojnosti, sprejele usklajene ukrepe, da bi drugim državam pomagale, prvič, preprečevati nezakonito trgovino z orožjem in, drugič, zlasti v „pokonfliktnih“ situacijah in kadar obstaja minimalna raven varnosti in stabilnosti, ustaviti promet in nezakonito trgovino z orožjem 81.
81 Among the aid measures envisaged by the external section of the 1997 Programme were the adoption or strengthening, as appropriate, of an adequate body of laws and administrative measures for regulating and monitoring effectively transfers of weapons; the setting up of programmes for the collection, buying back and destruction of weapons; the setting up of educational programmes to promote awareness among the local population of the negative consequences of illicit trafficking of arms; and the promotion of the integration of former combatants in civilian life.
Med ukrepi pomoči, predvidenimi v zunanjem delu programa iz leta 1997, so bili sprejetje ali okrepitev, glede na okoli�čine primera, ustreznega sklopa zakonov in drugih predpisov za ureditev in nadzor prometa z orožjem, priprava programov za zbiranje, odkup in uničenje orožja, sestava izobraževalnih programov za spodbujanje zavedanja med lokalno populacijo o negativnih učinkih nezakonite trgovine z orožjem in za spodbujanje integracije nekdanjih borcev v civilno življenje.
On 26 June 1997, a few days after the European Council of Amsterdam, the Council of the European Union adopted the first political initiative of the European Union in the sphere of combating the
Svet Evropske unije je 26. junija 1997, nekaj dni po evropskem svetu v Amsterdamu, sprejel prvo politično pobudo Evropske unije na področju dejavnosti proti �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra v obliki „programa za preprečevanje nezakonite trgovine s konvencionalnim orožjem in boj proti
78 — The text of the programme is available at the following internet address: http://grip.org/bdg/g1657.html
78 – Besedilo programa je na voljo na spletni strani: http://grip.org/bdg/g1599.html.
79 — The 1997 Programme mentions resolutions 51/45 F, ‘Measures to curb the illicit traffic and use of conventional arms’, 51/45 L, ‘Assistance to States for curbing the illicit traffic in small arms and collecting them’, and 51/45 N, ‘Consolidation of peace through practical disarmament measures’, all three adopted at the 79th plenary session of the United Nations of 10 December 1996.
79 – Program iz leta 1997 navaja zlasti resolucije 51/45 F o „ukrepih, ki se nana�ajo na omejevanje nezakonitega prometa s konvencionalnim orožjem in njegove uporabe“, 51/45 L o „[p]omoči državam, da ustavijo nezakonit promet in kopičenje orožja malega kalibra“ in 51/45 N o „okrepitvi miru na račun konkretnih ukrepov razorožitve“, pri čemer so bile vse tri sprejete na 79. plenarnem zasedanju 10. decembra 1996.
In the last mentioned resolution, the General Assembly of the United Nations states that it is ‘[c]onvinced that a comprehensive and integrated approach towards certain practical disarmament measures, such as, inter alia, arms control, particularly with regard to small arms and light weapons … often is a prerequisite to maintaining and consolidating peace and security and thus provides a basis for effective rehabilitation and social and economic development’.
V zadnjenavedeni resoluciji Generalna skup�čina Združenih narodov pravi, da je „prepričana, da je globalni in integrirani pristop v zvezi z nekaterimi konkretnimi ukrepi razoroževanja, zlasti nadzorom nad orožjem malega kalibra in lahkim orožjem, pogosto nujni pogoj za ohranitev in okrepitev miru in varnosti ter tako pomeni podlago za učinkovit postopek rehabilitacije ter gospodarski in socialni razvoj“.
77 — See the discussion at points 1 to 8 of the European Union Strategy to combat illicit accumulation and trafficking of small arms and light weapons and their ammunition, adopted by the European Council at the meeting of 15 and 16 December 2005 (Doc.
77 – V tem smislu glej analizo, navedeno v točkah od 1 do 8 Strategije Evropske unije dejavnosti proti kopičenju in nezakoniti trgovini z lahkim orožjem in orožjem malega kalibra, s pripadajočim strelivom, ki je bila sprejeta na evropskem svetu, ki je potekal 15. in 16. decembra 2005 (Dokument �t. 5319/06 SZVP 31).
According to this document, more than 600 million small arms were in circulation in the world and, of 49 major armed conflicts in the 1990s, 47 were fought with small arms and light weapons as the main weapons.
V skladu s tem dokumentom naj bi bilo v svetovnem prometu več kot 600 milijonov kosov lahkega orožja in v 49 večjih oboroženih spopadih v 90. letih prej�njega stoletja je bilo v 47 spopadih uporabljeno lahko orožje in orožje malega kalibra kot glavno orožje. V skladu s �tudijo iz maja 2004 naj bi bilo v nezakonitem prometu v Zahodni Afriki med 8 do 10 milijonov kosov lahkega orožja (glej: Bah A., Mise en œuvre du moratoire de la CEDEAO sur les armes légères et de petit calibre dans la Sierra Leone d’après­guerre, document de travail du Groupe de travail sur les armes légères, Comité coordonnateur canadien pour la consolidation de la paix, Ploughshares, Ontario, 200 4, str. 3.
This document is available at the following internet address: www.ploughshares.ca/ libraries/WorkingPapers/wp041eng.pdf
Ta dokument je na voljo na spletni strani: www.ploughshares. ca/libraries/WorkingPapers/wp041fr.pdf.
80 — Point 1 of the 1997 Programme.81 — Points 2 and 3 of the 1997 Programme.
80 – Točka 1 programa iz leta 1997.81 – Točki 2 in 3 programa iz leta 1997.
COMMISSION v COUNCIL tions and technical assistance in the collection and destruction of small arms and light weapons. 83
KOMISIJA PROTI SVETU zbiranje in uničenje lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra 83.
The 1997 Programme was supplemented and strengthened by Council Joint Action 1999/34/CFSP of 17 December 1998 on the European Union’s contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons, which was replaced by the contested Joint Action in 2002.
Program iz leta 1997 je bil dopolnjen in okrepljen z zgoraj navedenim skupnim ukrepom Sveta 1999/34/SZVP z dne 17. de -cembra 1998 o prispevku Evropske unije k dejavnosti proti destabilizirajočemu kopičenju in �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra, ki ga je leta 2002 nadomestil sporni skupni ukrep.
On 21 May 1999, referring to Joint Action 1999/34/CFSP, the Council adopted a resolution on small arms in which it pointed out that the proliferation of small arms and the lack of controls had fuelled internal or inter-State conflicts and had been an obstacle to peaceful economic and social development, 84and ‘recommend[ed] that in the field of development cooperation the Community and the Member States devote particular attention’ to measures including the ‘inclusion of the small arms issue in the political dialogue with ACP and other development cooperation partner countries of [the European Union]’, ‘development cooperation support for countries seeking assistance in the control or elimination of surplus small
Svet je 21. maja 1999, pri čemer je spomnil na zgoraj navedeni skupni ukrep 1999/34/SZVP, sprejel resolucijo o lahkem orožju, v kateri je navedel, da sta �irjenje orožja malega kalibra in nezadosten nadzor povzročila notranje ali meddržavne spopade, pri čemer je bil oviran miren gospodarski in socialni razvoj 84, in „svetoval, naj bodo Skupnost in države članice v okviru razvojnega sodelovanja posebno pozorne na ukrepe, ki se nana�ajo“ zlasti na „vključitev vpra�anja glede orožja malega kalibra v politični dialog
Several specific regional actions implementing Joint Action 1999/34/CFSP have been adopted by the European Union, 82 mainly in the form of financial contribu-
Evropska unija je sprejela več posebnih regionalnih ukrepov za izvedbo Skupnega ukrepa 1999/34/SZVP 82, v glavnem v obliki finančnih prispevkov in tehnične pomoči za
83 — Like Decision 1999/845/CFSP, whereby the European Union made a financial contribution to the locating, collecting and destroying of weapons in Mozambique through the joint crossborder operations carried out by the South African Police and the Mozambique Police (Operation Rachel), Decision 2000/803/CFSP, granting aid in the form of equipment to the local police forces in South Ossetia responsible for the control, collection and destruction of small arms and light weapons in that region, and, to a lesser degree, Decision 1999/730/CFSP, making a financial contribution and giving technical assistance to the Cambodian Government for the development of appropriate laws and regulations on the ownership, possession, use, sale and transfer of arms and ammunition, for developing procedures for voluntary surrender of small arms and for identifying and destroying surplus small arms, and supporting civil society programmes to raise public awareness of problems related to small arms, and light weapons, and Decision 2001/850/CFSP, giving financial support to the small arms and light weapons control programme in Albania established under the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), contributing, in particular, to the collection of arms in that State.
83 – Kot zgoraj navedeni Sklep 1999/845/SZVP, s katerim je Evropska unija dodelila prispevek v obliki finančne pomoči za odkrivanje, zbiranje in uničenje orožja v Mozambiku s čezmejnimi operacijami, ki jih je izvajala z južnoafri�ko in mozambi�ko policijo (operacija Rachel), zgoraj navedeni Sklep 2000/803/SZVP, v okviru katerega je bila dodeljena pomoč v obliki opreme za lokalne policijske sile v Južni Osetiji, pristojne za zbiranje in uničenje lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra na tem področju, in manj zgoraj navedeni Sklep 1999/730/SZVP, ki se nana�a na finančni prispevek in tehnično pomoč kambo�ki vladi, zlasti za pripravo ustrezne zakonodaje in drugih predpisov o lastni�tvu, posesti, uporabi, prodaji in prometu z orožjem in pripadajočim strelivom, da bi se opredelili postopki za prostovoljno predajo orožja malega kalibra in odkrile ter uničile presežne zaloge orožja malega kalibra ter podprli programi civilne družbe, ki se nana�ajo na ozave�čanje javnosti o problemih, povezanih z lahkim orožjem in orožjem malega kalibra, ter zgoraj navedeni Sklep 2001/850/SZVP, ki se nana�a na finančno pomoč programu nadzora lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra v Albaniji, vzpostavljenega v okviru programa Združenih narodov za razvoj (PNUD), ki prispeva zlasti k spodbujanju zbiranja orožja v tej državi.
By Decision 2001/200/CFSP the European Union made a financial contribution to the projects of the United Nations Regional Centre for Peace, Disarmament and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, located in Lima, for the training of local customs and police officials.
V okviru zgoraj navedenega Sklepa 2001/200/SZVP je Evropska unija dodelila finančni prispevek za projekte Regionalnega centra Združenih narodov za mir, razorožitev in razvoj Latinske Amerike in Karibov s sedežem v Limi, ki so namenjeni izobraževanju lokalnih carinskih in policijskih organov.
82 — Council Decision 1999/730/CFSP of 15 November 1999 implementing Joint Action 1999/34/CFSP with a view to a European Union contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons in Cambodia (OJ 1999 L 294, p.
82 – Sklep Sveta 1999/730/SZVP z dne 15. novembra 1999 o izvajanju Skupnega ukrepa 1999/34/SZVP ob prispevku Evropske unije za boj proti destabilizirajočemu kopičenju in �irjenju osebnega in lahkega orožja v Kambodži (UL L 294, str.
5); Council Decision 1999/845/CFSP of 17 December 1999 implementing Joint Action 1999/34/CFSP with a view to a European Union contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons in Mozambique (OJ 1999 L 326, p.
5); Sklep Sveta 1999/845/SZVP z dne 17. decembra 1999 o izvajanju Skupnega ukrepa 1999/34/SZVP ob prispevku Evropske unije za boj proti destabilizirajočemu kopičen- ju in �irjenju osebnega in lahkega orožja v Mozambiku (UL L 326, str.