natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(a) designation of origin: means the name of a region, a specific place or, in exceptional cases, a country, used to describe an agricultural product or a foodstuff:
(a) označba porekla: pomeni ime regije, posebnega kraja ali, v izjemnih primerih, državo, ki se uporablja za opis kmetijskega proizvoda ali živila:
For the purposes of this Regulation, a “name that has become generic” means the name of an agricultural product or a foodstuff which, although it relates to the place or the region where this product or foodstuff was originally produced or marketed, has become the common name of an agricultural product or a foodstuff.
Za namene te uredbe pomeni ‚ime, ki je postalo generično‘ ime kmetijskega proizvoda ali živila, ki je, čeprav se nana�a na kraj ali regijo, kjer je bil ta proizvod ali živilo prvotno proizvedeno ali trženo, postalo splo�no ime kmetijskega proizvoda ali živila.
To establish whether or not a name has become generic, account shall be taken of all factors, in particular:
– s poreklom iz navedene regije, posebnega kraja ali države, in
— originating in that region, specific place or country, and
Da bi ugotovili, ali je ime postalo generično ali ne, se upo�tevajo vsi faktorji, zlasti:
— the quality or characteristics of which are essentially or exclusively due to a particular geographical environment with its inherent natural and human factors, and the production, processing and preparation of which take place in the defined geographical area …’
– katerega kakovost ali značilnosti so bistveno ali izključno posledica posebnega geografskega okolja z njegovimi lastnimi naravnimi in člove�kimi faktorji ter katerega proizvodnja, predelave in priprava za trg, potekajo znotraj definiranega geografskega območja; obstoječe stanje v državi članici, od koder izvira poreklo imena, in na območjih potro�nje,
— the existing situation in other Member States,
– obstoječe stanje v drugih državah članicah,
— the relevant national or Community laws.
– zadevna nacionalna zakonodaja ali zakonodaja Skupnosti.
If a designated inspection authority and/or private body in a Member State establishes that an agricultural product or a foodstuff bearing a protected name of origin in that Member State does not meet the criteria of the specification, they shall take the steps necessary to ensure that this Regulation is complied with.
Če pristojni kontrolni organ in/ali zasebni subjekt ugotovita, da kmetijski proizvod ali živilo, ki nosi za�čiteno ime s poreklom, v tisti državi članici ne izpolnjuje kriterijev in zahtev specifikacije, bosta izvedla potrebne ukrepe, da se zagotovi skladnost s to uredbo.
They shall inform the Member State of the measures taken in carrying out their inspections.
Državo članico obvestita o izvedenih ukrepih pri opravljanju kontrole.
The parties concerned must be notified of all decisions taken.’
Zadevne strani morajo biti obve�čene o vseh sprejetih odločitvah.“
Where, following the procedure laid down in Articles 6 and 7, an application of registration is rejected because a name has become generic, the Commission shall publish that decision in the Official Journal of the European Communities.’
Kjer se v skladu s postopkom iz členov 6 in 7 vloga za registracijo zavrne, ker je ime postalo generično, Komisija objavi navedeno odločitev v Uradnem listu Evropskih skupnosti.“
Article 13 states:
Člen 13 določa:
Article 10 provides:
Člen 10 določa:
Registered names shall be protected against:
Registrirana imena so za�čitena proti:
Member States shall ensure that not later than six months after the entry into force of this Regulation inspection structures are in place, the function of which shall be to ensure that agricultural products and foodstuffs bearing a protected name meet the requirements laid down in the specifications.
Države članice zagotovijo, da bodo najkasneje v �estih mesecih po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe vzpostavljene strukture kontrole, katerih naloga je zagotavljati, da kmetijski proizvodi in živila, ki nosijo za�čiteno ime, izpolnjujejo zahteve, določene v specifikacijah.
(b) any misuse, imitation or evocation, even if the true origin of the product is indicated or if the protected name is translated or accompanied by an expression such as “style”, “type”, “method”, “as produced in”, “imitation” or similar;
(b) vsaki zlorabi, posnemanju ali navajanju, četudi je pravo poreklo proizvoda označeno ali če je za�čiteno ime prevedeno ali mu je dodan izraz kot je ‚slog‘, ‚tip‘, ‚metoda‘, ‚kakor se proizvaja v‘, ‚imitacija‘ in podobno;
No 1107/96 3(the ‘Registration Regulation’) with effect from 21 June 1996.
21. junija 1996.
Where a registered name contains within it the name of an agricultural product or foodstuff which is considered generic, the use of that generic name on the appropriate agricultural product or foodstuff shall not be considered to be contrary to (a) or (b) in the first subparagraph.
Kadar registrirano ime znotraj vsebuje ime kmetijskega proizvoda ali živila, ki se �teje kot generično, se uporaba navedenega generičnega imena na ustreznem kmetijskem proizvodu ali živilu ne �teje, kot da je v nasprotju z (a) ali (b) v prvem pododstavku.
The designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ was registered under the simplified procedure laid down in Article 17 of the Basic Regulation.
Označba „Parmigiano Reggiano“ je bila registrirana po poenostavljenem postopku, ki ga določa člen 17 Temeljne uredbe.
This simplified procedure only applied to registrations requested within six months of the entry into force of the Basic Regulation.
Poenostavljeni postopek se uporablja samo za registracije, ki so zahtevane v �estih mesecih od začetka veljavnosti Temeljne uredbe.
It was intended to give Communitywide protection to those designations which already existed before the entry into force of the Basic Regulation, either because they enjoyed legal protection under the national law of Member States, or for those Member States which did not have a protection system, because the designation had been established by usage.
Namen je bil na ravni Skupnosti za�čititi tiste označbe, ki so obstajale, preden je začela veljati Temeljna uredba, bodisi zato, ker so uživale pravno za�čito po nacionalni zakonodaji držav članic, bodisi za tiste države članice, ki niso poznale sistema za�čite, ker je bila označba uveljavljena z uporabo.
Under the simplified procedure a registration was exempt from the objection phase required by Article 7 of the Basic Regulation under the normal procedure.
Po poenostavljenem postopku zoper registracijo ni bilo mogoče podati ugovora, ki ga predvideva člen 7 Temeljne uredbe na podlagi običajnega postopka.
Protected generic.’
Za�čiteno ime ne sme postati generično.“
Following a complaint filed by several economic operators, the Commission
Komisija je po več vloženih pritožbah gospodarskih subjektov od nem�kih organov
The designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ was registered as a designation of origin pursuant to Article 2 and Title A of the Annex to Commission Regulation (EC)
Označba „Parmigiano Reggiano“ je bila registrirana kot označba porekla na podlagi člena 2 in Naslova A Priloge k Uredbi Komi-
OPINION OF MR MAZÁK — CASE C-132/05 present action before the Court and claims that the Court should: requested the German authorities, by letter of 15 April 2003, to give clear instructions to the government agencies responsible for the prosecution of fraud to bring to an end the marketing of products designated as ‘Parmesan’ which did not conform to the mandatory specification for the registered designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ on German territory.
– z dopisom z dne 15. aprila 2003 zahtevala, naj dajo jasna navodila vladnim agencijam, pristojnim za pregon goljufij, naj ukrepajo, da se na nem�kem ozemlju preneha trženje proizvodov, označenih kot „Parmesan“, ki ne ustrezajo obveznim specifikacijam registrirane označbe „Parmigiano Reggiano“.
The term ‘Parmesan’ was, according to the Commission, the translation of the registered designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’, and its use thus constituted a breach of Article 13(1)(b) of the Basic Regulation.
Pojem „Parmesan“ je bil, po mnenju Komisije, prevod registrirane označbe „Parmigiano Reggiano“ in tako je njegova uporaba pomenila kr�itev člena 13(1)(b) Temeljne uredbe.
— declare that, by formally refusing to prosecute, on its territory, the use of the name ‘Parmesan’ for the labelling of products which do not conform to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ and thus promoting the exploitation of the reputation of the genuine, Communitywide protected product, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs;
ugotovi, da Zvezna republika Nemčija s formalnim zavračanjem pregona na svojem ozemlju uporabe imena „Parmesan“ za označevanje proizvodov, ki ne ustrezajo specifikaciji za�čitene označbe porekla „Parmigiano Reggiano“ in s tem s spodbujanjem izrabe ugleda pristnega proizvoda, za�čitenega na ravni Skupnosti, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz člena 13(1)(b) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) �t. 2081/92 z dne 14. julija 1992 o za�čiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila;
In its response, the German Government contended that, although the term ‘Parmesan’ had historically originated in the region of Parma, it had become generic and was used to designate hard cheeses of diverse geographical origins, grated or intended to be grated.
V odgovoru je nem�ka vlada zatrjevala, da je pojem „Parmesan“, četudi zgodovinsko izvira iz regije Parma, že postal generičen in se ga uporablja za označevanje trdih sirov različnih geografskih porekel, ki se jih strga ali so namenjeni strganju.
Therefore the term ‘Parmesan’ is different from the designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ and its use does not constitute a breach of the Basic Regulation.
Zato se pojem „Parmesan“ razlikuje od označbe „Parmigiano Reggiano“ in njegova uporaba ne pomeni kr�itve Temeljne uredbe.
— order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Zvezni republiki Nemčiji naloži plačilo stro�kov postopka.
III — Procedure before the Court and forms of order sought
III – Postopek pred Sodiščem in predlogi strank
IV — Preliminary remarks
IV – Uvodne ugotovitve
As the parties maintained their positions in the course of the prelitigation proceedings, the Commission decided to bring the
Ker sta v predsodnem postopku stranki vztrajali pri svojih stali�čih, se je Komisija
In the present case, it will first be necessary to determine whether the use of the term ‘Parmesan’ for the labelling of products
V tej zadevi bo treba najprej ugotoviti, ali uporaba gospodarskih subjektov v Nemčiji
V — Is the name ‘Parmesan’ protected as a consequence of the registration of the PDO ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’?
V – Ali je ime „Parmesan“ zaščiteno na podlagi registracije ZOP „Parmigiano Reggiano“?
which do not conform to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ by economic operators in Germany constitutes a breach of the Article 13(1)(b) of the Basic Regulation.
pojma „Parmesan“ za označevanje proizvodov, ki ne ustrezajo specifikaciji za�čitene označbe porekla „Parmigiano Reggiano“, pomeni kr�itev člena 13(1)(b) Temeljne uredbe.
In this connection Germany has in particular raised the defence that ‘Parmesan’ has become a generic name, which cannot therefore be protected by the registration of the PDO ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’.
V zvezi s tem je Nemčija v svoj bran navedla zlasti to, da je „Parmesan“ postal generično ime in zato ne more biti za�čiten z registracijo ZOP „Parmigiano Reggiano“.
A — Main submissions of the parties
A – Bistvene trditve strank
The history of the designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ shows the close link between the cheese, the region where it is produced and the name ‘Parmesan’, which is therefore by no means a generic name.
Zgodovina označbe „Parmigiano Reggiano“ kaže na tesno povezanost med sirom, regijo, kjer se ga proizvaja, in imenom „Parmesan“, ki zato nikakor ni generično ime.
However, even if ‘Parmesan’ is not assumed to be the translation of the complete PDO ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’, the word ‘Parmesan’ is nevertheless the literal translation of the word ‘Parmigiano’ into French, from which it passed centuries ago into German and other languages.
Vendar tudi če ne predpostavljamo, da je „Parmesan“ prevod celotne ZOP „Parmigiano Reggiano“, je beseda „Parmesan“ dobeseden prevod besede „parmigiano“ v franco�čino, iz katere se je pred stoletji prenesla v nem�čino in druge jezike.
The translation of the constituent element ‘Parmigiano’
Prevod temeljnega elementa „Parmigiano“ je za�čiten, ker po
I will then examine whether Germany has infringed its obligations arising from Article 13(1)(b) of the Basic Regulation by failing to take ex officio action against a situation which, in the view of the Commission, constitutes an infringement of Community law by private parties, that is to say, the use of the name ‘Parmesan’ for the labelling of products which do not conform to the specification for the PDO ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’.
Nato bom preučil, ali je Nemčija kr�ila obveznosti iz člena 13(1)(b) Temeljne uredbe, ker ni po uradni dolžnosti ukrepala v položaju, ki po mnenju Komisije pomeni kr�itev zasebnikov prava Skupnosti, torej z uporabo imena „Parmesan“ za označevanje proizvodov, ki ne ustrezajo specifikaciji ZOP „Parmigiano Reggiano“.
The answer to this question will help to clarify the scope of the obligation imposed on Member States under the Basic Regulation to ensure compliance on their territory with that Regulation.
Odgovor na to vpra�anje bo pomagal razjasniti obseg obveznosti, ki jo državam članicam nalaga Temeljna uredba, da na svojem ozemlju zagotovijo skladnost s to uredbo.
Furthermore there are no valid reasons for Germany’s view that the expression ‘Parmigiano’ is, when used alone, to be regarded, in the sense of Article 3 of the Basic Regulation, as a generic name which the consumer does not associate with a specific geographical area.
Poleg tega ne obstajajo tehtni razlogi za nem�ko stali�če, da za izraz „parmigiano“, kadar se uporablja posebej, velja, da je generično ime v smislu člena 3 Temeljne uredbe, ki ga potro�niki ne povezujejo z določenim geografskim območjem.
Moreover, the translation ‘Parmesan’ has not evolved to become a generic term.
Še več, prevod „Parmesan“ se ni razvil, da bi postal generičen izraz.
is protected because, under Community law, the registration of a designation containing several terms confers the same protection on the constituent elements as on the compound designation as a whole.
pravu Skupnosti registracija označbe z več izrazi podeljuje enako za�čito tako temeljnim elementom kot sestavljeni označbi kot celoti.
Thus the Basic Regulation does not require the registration of each of the individual elements intended to be protected within a compound designation, but assumes that each element is protected.
Temeljna uredba zato ne zahteva registracije vsakega posamičnega elementa, da bi bil dejansko za�čiten v sestavljeni označbi, ampak domneva, da je vsak element za�čiten.
This means that even if Parmesan is not considered to be the translation of the PDO ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ but only the literal translation of its constituent element ‘Parmigiano’, its translation ‘Parmesan’ is necessarily protected as a consequence of the protection of the designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’.
To pomeni, da tudi če velja, da Parmesan ni prevod ZOP „Parmigiano Reggiano“, ampak le dobeseden prevod temeljnega elementa „Parmigiano“, je prevod „Parmesan“ nujno za�čiten kot posledica za�čite označbe „Parmigiano Reggiano“.
Of course, a geographical designation could, over time and through use, become a generic term in the sense that consumers come to regard it as an indication of a certain type of product rather than as an indication of the geographical origin of the product, as occurred for instance in the case of the designations ‘Camembert’ and ‘Brie’.
Seveda lahko sčasoma in z uporabo geografska označba postane generičen izraz v smislu, da potro�niki gledajo nanjo bolj kot na oznako določene vrste proizvoda in ne kot na oznako geografskega porekla proizvoda, kar se je, na primer, zgodilo v primeru označb „Camembert“ in „Brie“.
In the present case, however, the Commission points out that historically there has always been a close connection between the particular geographical region of Italy, where the cheese comes from, and the term ‘Parmesan’, a fact which demonstrates that the term has never, at any point in time, lost its geographical connotation.
Vendar v tej zadevi Komisija poudarja, da je zgodovinsko vedno obstajala tesna povezava med določeno geografsko regijo v Italiji, od koder prihaja sir, in izrazom „Parmesan“, kar dokazuje, da pojem ni nikoli, v nobenem obdobju, izgubil geografske konotacije.
Therefore the name Parmesan is not a generic term which can be distinguished from the protected designation of origin ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’.
Zato ime Parmesan ni generičen pojem, ki se ga lahko loči od za�čitene označbe porekla „Parmigiano Reggiano“.
It is only where the Member State concerned indicates in the course of the registration procedure of a compound designation to the Commission that the protection is not requested for certain parts of the designation, that a constituent element of a compound designation would, used on its own, not benefit from the protection granted by the Basic Regulation.
Le če zadevna država članica med postopkom registracije sestavljene označbe naznani Komisiji, da ne zahteva za�čite za določene dele označbe, temeljni element sestavljene označbe ne bi užival za�čite po Temeljni uredbi, kadar bi bil uporabljen samostojno.
The Commission would then have had to take this into account when passing the Registration Regulation by declaring in a footnote that protection for a given constituent element of a compound designation was not requested.
Komisija bi to morala upo�tevati ob sprejetju Registracijske uredbe, tako da bi v opombi navedla, da ni bila zahtevana za�čita za obravnavani temeljni element sestavljene označbe.
In the case of the designation of origin ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’, neither of the two constituent elements was however the subject of such a footnote.
Pri označbi porekla „Parmigiano Reggiano“ nobeden od dveh temeljnih elementov ni bil omenjen v taki opombi.
If the name ‘Parmesan’ were really a neutral term without such a connotation, there would be no plausible explanation for the efforts of manufacturers of imitations to establish through words or images a link between their products and Italy.
Če bi bilo ime „Parmesan“ resnično nevtralen izraz brez te konotacije, ne bi bilo verodostojne razlage za napore proizvajalcev ponaredkov, da z besedami ali slikami vzpostavijo povezavo med svojimi proizvodi in Italijo.
In any event it is only since 21 June 1996, the date when the Registration Regulation entered into force, that the designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ has been protected at Community level.
Nem�ka vlada ob podpori danske in avstrijske vlade trdi, da „Parmesan“ ni prevod ZOP „Parmigiano Reggiano“ v nem�čino, ampak generično ime, ki se uporablja za označevanje vrste trdih sirov, ki se jih strga ali pa so namenjeni strganju, ki med drugim vključuje tudi „Parmigiano Reggiano“.
The German Government, supported by the Danish and Austrian Governments, submits that ‘Parmesan’ is not the translation of the PDO ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ into German but a generic name used to designate a category of hard cheeses, grated and intended to be grated, which includes, amongst others, ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’.
Dejstvo, da so do leta 2000 na ozemlju Italije proizvajali sir, imenovan „Parmesan“, ki ni ustrezal obvezni specifikaciji za „Parmigiano Reggiano“, ne pomeni, da je bil izraz generičen pojem v Italiji za trde sire različnega porekla, saj je bil zadevni sir izključno namenjen za izvoz v države, kjer izraz „Parmesan“ ni užival posebne za�čite po načelu geografske za�čite.
The use of the designation ‘Parmesan’ for a cheese which does not conform to the speci- fication for ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ would in any event constitute an evocation of that PDO, which is prohibited by Article 13(1)(b) of the Basic Regulation.
Označba porekla je predmet za�čite člena 13 Temeljne uredbe v natančno taki obliki, kot je bila registrirana. Na podlagi sodbe Sodi�ča v združenih zadevah Chiciak in Fol 4 ne moremo sklepati drugače.
Since ‘Parmesan’ is the literal translation, even in the opinion of the Commission, of the term ‘Parmigiano’, the use of the word ‘Parmesan’ does not infringe the protection granted by Article 13(1)(b) of the Basic Regulation to the designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’.
Ker je „Parmesan“ celo po mnenju Komisije dobeseden prevod izraza „parmigiano“’, uporaba besede „Parmesan“ ne kr�i za�čite, ki jo člen 13(1)(b) Temeljne uredbe zagotavlja označbi „Parmigiano Reggiano“.
Furthermore, in the context of the Court’s decision in Bigi, 5 the Italian Govern- ment had itself expressly confirmed that it had purposely not registered the designation ‘Parmigiano’.
Dalje, v kontekstu sodbe Sodi�ča v zadevi Bigi 5je italijanska vlada sama izrecno potr- dila, da namenoma ni registrirala označbe „Parmigiano“.
Under these circumstances, in the absence of a registration, the designation ‘Parmigiano’ cannot on its own enjoy protection under Community law.
V teh okoli�činah, ko ne obstaja registracija, označba „Parmigiano“ sama po sebi ne more uživati za�čite po pravu Skupnosti.
In the alternative, the German Government submits that, even if the term ‘Parmigiano’ were not regarded as a generic designation, the use of the translation ‘Parmesan’ would still not automatically constitute a misuse of the PDO ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’.
Nem�ka vlada podredno predlaga, da tudi če izraz „parmigiano“ ne �teje za generično označbo, uporaba prevoda „Parmesan“ ne bi avtomatično pomenila zlorabe ZOP „Parmigiano Reggiano“.
The use of a translation of a PDO and a fortiori of individual elements of a PDO constitutes a violation of Article 13(1)(b) only if that translation in fact constitutes an evocation of that PDO.
Uporaba prevoda ZOP in a fortiori posameznih elementov ZOP pomeni kr�itev po členu 13(1)(b) le, če prevod dejansko pomeni navajanje ZOP.
In this connection it must also be pointed out that, as illustrated by the situation in Italy and other Member States as well as by legislation at national and Community level, the expression ‘Parmigiano’ is, when used alone, to be regarded as a generic name in the sense of Article 3 of the Basic Regulation.
V zvezi s tem moram prav tako izpostaviti, kot prikazujeta položaj v Italiji in drugih državah članicah ter zakonodaja na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti, da je izraz „parmigiano“, kadar ga uporabljamo samostojno, treba �teti za generično ime v smislu člena 3 Temeljne uredbe.
Therefore, according to Article 13(1), second sentence, of the Basic Regulation, the term ‘Parmigiano’ cannot benefit from the protection of the Basic Regulation because of its generic character.
Zato v skladu s členom 13(1), drugi stavek, Temeljne uredbe izraz „parmigiano“ zaradi generičnega značaja ne more uživati za�čite Temeljne uredbe.
In any event, what is decisive in the context of infringement proceedings is
5 – Sodba z dne 25. junija 2002 v zadevi Bigi (C-66/00, Recueil, str. I-5917).
There was no such evocation in the case of the name ‘Parmesan’, which has undergone an evolution independent of the designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’ and over centuries become a generic designation in the common language of consumers.
Takega navajanja ni bilo v primeru imena „Parmesan“, ki se je razvijal neodvisno od označbe „Parmigiano Reggiano“ in je v stoletjih postal generična označba v pogovornem jeziku potro�nikov.
This evolution is peculiar to this designation and occurred in Germany, and in other Member States.
Ta razvoj je svojstven tej oznaki in se je zgodil v Nemčiji in drugih državah članicah.
Therefore the use of the term ‘Parmesan’ does not constitute a misuse or evocation of the protected designation ‘Parmigiano Reggiano’.
Zato uporaba izraza „Parmesan“ ne pomeni zlorabe ali navajanja za�čitene označbe „Parmigiano Reggiano“.