natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This Regulation shall apply to unbundled access to the local loops and related facilities of notified operators as defined in Article 2(a).
Ta uredba se uporablja za razvezani dostop do krajevnih zank in pripadajočih zmogljivosti prigla�enih obratovalcev, kot je določeno v členu 2, [točka (a)].
This Regulation is without prejudice to the rights of Member States to maintain or introduce measures in conformity with Community law which contain more detailed
Ta uredba ne posega v pravice držav članic, da v skladu s zakonodajo Skupnosti ohranijo ali uvedejo ukrepe, ki vsebujejo podrobnej�e določbe, kot so tiste, ki jih
2008 — CASE C-55/06 provisions than those set out in this Regulation and/or are outside the scope of this Regulation inter alia with respect to other types of access to local infrastructures.’
2008 – ZADEVA C-55/06 vsebuje ta uredba in/ali ne spadajo v področje uporabe te uredbe, med drugim v zvezi z drugimi vrstami dostopa do lokalnih infrastruktur.“
According to Article 2 of Regulation No 2887/2000 the following definitions apply:
V skladu s členom 2 navedene uredbe se uporabljajo naslednje opredelitve:
‘(a) “notified operator”; means operators of fixed public telephone networks that have been designated by their national regulatory authority [‘NRA’] as having significant market power in the provision of fixed public telephone networks and services under Annex I, Part 1, of Directive 97/33/EC or Directive 98/10/EC;
„a) ‚prigla�eni obratovalec‘ pomeni obratovalce fiksnih javnih telefonskih omrežij, ki jih je njihov nacionalni regulativni organ [v nadaljevanju: NRO] imenoval za obratovalce s pomembno tržno močjo pri zagotavljanju fiksnih javnih telefonskih omrežij in storitev po delu I Priloge I Direktive 97/33/ES ali Direktive 98/10/ES; b) ‚upravičenec‘ pomeni tretjo osebo, ki je ustrezno poobla�čena v skladu z Direktivo 97/13/ES ali upravičena do opravljanja komunikacijskih storitev po nacionalni zakonodaji in ima pravico do razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke; c) ‚krajevna zanka‘ pomeni fizični vod posukanih kovinskih parov v fiksnem javnem telefonskem omrežju, ki povezuje omrežno priključno točko v naročnikovih objektih z glavnim razdelilnikom ali enakovredno napravo;
Article 3(2) and (3) of Regulation No 2887/2000, entitled ‘Provision of unbundled access’, states:
Člen 3(2) in (3) Uredbe �t. 2887/2000 z naslovom „Zagotavljanje razvezanega dostopa“ določa:
Notified operators shall from 31 December 2000 meet reasonable requests from beneficiaries for unbundled access to their local loops and related facilities, under transparent, fair and non-discriminatory conditions.
Od 31. decembra 2000 dalje prigla�eni obratovalci izpolnjujejo utemeljene zahteve upravičencev za razvezani dostop do njihovih krajevnih zank in pripadajočih zmogljivosti pod preglednimi, pravičnimi in nediskriminacijskimi pogoji.
Requests shall only be refused on the basis of objective criteria, relating to technical feasibility or the need to maintain network integrity.
Zahteve se zavrnejo samo na podlagi objektivnih meril, povezanih s tehnično izvedljivostjo ali potrebo po ohranitvi celovitosti omrežja.
Where access is refused, the aggrieved party may submit the case to the dispute resolution procedure referred to in Article 4(5).
Kadar se dostop zavrne, lahko o�kodovana stranka predloži primer v re�evanje po postopku re�evanja sporov iz člena 4(5).
Notified operators shall provide beneficiaries with facilities equivalent to those provided for their own services or to their associated companies, and with the same conditions and time-scales.
Prigla�eni obratovalci priskrbijo upravičencem zmogljivosti, enake tistim, ki jih zagotovijo za svoje lastne storitve ali svojim povezanim podjetjem, in pod enakimi pogoji ter v enakih časovnih okvirih.
Without prejudice to Article 4(4), notified operators shall charge prices for unbundled access to the local loop and related facilities set on the basis of cost-orientation.’
Brez poseganja v člen 4(4) prigla�eni obratovalci zaračunavajo cene za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke in do pripadajočih zmogljivosti na podlagi stro�kovne naravnanosti.“
Article 4 of Regulation No 2887/2000, entitled ‘Supervision by the [NRA]’, provides:
Člen 4 te uredbe z naslovom „Nadzor [NRO]“ določa:
The [NRA] shall ensure that charging for unbundled access to the local loop fosters fair and sustainable competition.
[NRO] zagotovi, da se z zaračunavanjem razvezanega dostopa do krajevne zanke pospe�uje po�tena in [trajnostna] konkurenca.
(a) impose changes on the reference offer for unbundled access to the local loop and related facilities, including prices, where such changes are justified; and
[NRO] je poobla�čen, da: a) zahteva spremembe referenčne ponudbe za razvezani dostop do krajevne zanke in pripadajočih zmogljivosti, vključno s cenami, kadar so take spremembe upravičene; in
(b) require notified operators to supply information relevant for the implementation of this Regulation.
2008 – ZADEVA C-55/06 b) zahteva od prigla�enih obratovalcev, da predložijo informacije, ki so primerne za izvajanje te uredbe.
The [NRA] may, where justified, intervene on its own initiative in order to ensure nondiscrimination, fair competition, economic efficiency and maximum benefit for users.
[NRO] lahko, kadar je to utemeljeno, ukrepa na lastno pobudo, da bi zagotovil nediskriminacijo, po�teno konkurenco, gospodarsko učinkovitost in maksimalno korist za uporabnike.
When the [NRA] determines that the local access market is sufficiently competitive, it shall relieve the notified operators of the obligation laid down in Article 3(3) for prices to be set on the basis of costorientation.
Če [NRO] ugotovi, da je trg za krajevni dostop dovolj konkurenčen, razre�i prigla�ene obratovalce obveznosti iz člena 3(3), po katerem morajo cene določati na podlagi stro�kovne naravnanosti.
Disputes between undertakings concerning issues included in this Regulation shall be subject to the national dispute resolution procedures established in conformity with Directive 97/33/EC and shall be handled promptly, fairly and transparently.’
Za spore med podjetji glede zadev, vključenih v to uredbo, veljajo nacionalni postopki re�evanja sporov, ki so določeni v skladu z Direktivo 97/33/ES, spori pa se re�ujejo hitro, pravično in pregledno.“
The former regulatory framework for telecommunications (‘the FRF’)
Nekdanji regulativni okvir za telekomunikacije (v nadaljevanju: NekdRO)
According to Article 1(1) thereof, Council Directive 90/387/EEC of 28 June 1990 on the establishment of the internal market for telecommunications services through the implementation of open network provision (OJ 1990 L 192, p.
Direktiva Sveta 90/387/EGS z dne 28. junija 1990 o vzpostavitvi notranjega trga za telekomunikacijske storitve z uvedbo zagotavljanja odprtosti omrežij (UL L 192, str.
1), as amended by Directive 97/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October
1), kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/51/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. oktobra 1997 (UL L 295, str.
Under Article 2(8) of that directive ‘open network provision conditions’ means:
V skladu s členom 2, točka 8, te direktive so „pogoji zagotavljanja odprtega omrežja“:
‘the conditions … which govern open and efficient access to public telecommunications networks and, where applicable, public telecommunications services and the efficient use of those networks and services.
„pogoji […], ki se nana�ajo na svobodo in učinkovitost dostopa do javnih telekomunikacijskih omrežij in po potrebi javnih telekomunikacijskih storitev, ter na učinkovitost uporabe teh omrežij in storitev.
Without prejudice to their application on a case-by-case basis, open network provision conditions may include harmonised conditions with regard to:
Ne glede na njihovo uporabo v posameznih primerih lahko pogoji zagotavljanja odprtega omrežja zajemajo usklajene pogoje v zvezi s/z:
— technical interfaces, including the definition and implementation of network termination points, where required,
– tehničnimi vmesniki, po potrebi vključno z določitvijo in vzpostavitvijo končnih točk omrežja,
— usage conditions,
– pogoji uporabe,
— access to frequencies and numbers/addresses/names, where required in accordance with the reference framework of the Annex.’
– dostopom do frekvenc in �tevilk/naslovov/imen, po potrebi v skladu z referenčnim okvirom iz Priloge“.
Article 3(1) of Directive 90/387 provides:
Člen 3(1) Direktive 90/387 določa:
‘Open network provision conditions must comply with a number of basic principles set out hereafter, namely that:
„Pogoji zagotavljanja odprtega omrežja morajo ustrezati naslednjim temeljnim načelom:
— they must be based on objective criteria,
– temeljiti morajo na objektivnih merilih,
— they must be transparent and published in an appropriate manner,
– biti morajo pregledni in ustrezno objavljeni,
— they must guarantee equality of access and must be non-discriminatory, in accordance with Community law.’
– v skladu s pravom Skupnosti morajo zagotavljati enakost dostopa in ne smejo ustvarjati diskriminacije.“
Article 5a(3) of Directive 90/387 states that:
Člen 5a(3) navedene direktive določa:
‘Member States shall ensure that suitable mechanisms exist at national level under which a party affected by a decision of the [NRA] has a right of appeal to a body independent of the parties involved.’
„Države članice poskrbijo, da so na nacionalni ravni na voljo učinkoviti mehanizmi, po katerih ima vsaka stranka, ki je prizadeta z odločbo [NRO], pravico do pritožbe zoper odločbo pri pritožbenem organu, ki je neodvisen od udeleženih strank.“
Point 3, concerning harmonised tariff principles, of the annex to Directive 90/387, entitled ‘Reference Framework for the application of ONP conditions’, states the following:
Direktiva 90/387 vsebuje prilogo z naslovom „Referenčni okvir za izvajanje pogojev zagotavljanja odprtega omrežja“, katere točka 3, ki se nana�a na usklajevanje načel oblikovanja cen, določa:
‘Tariff principles must be consistent with the principles stated in Article 3(1).
„Načela oblikovanja cen morajo ustrezati načelom iz člena 3(1).
Those principles imply, in particular, that:
Ta načela zajemajo zlasti naslednje:
— tariffs must be based on objective criteria and, until such time as competition becomes effective in keeping down prices for users, must in principle be cost oriented, on the understanding that the fixing of the actual tariff level will continue to be the province of national legislation and is not the subject of open network provisions conditions.
– cene morajo temeljiti na objektivnih merilih in biti načeloma – dokler konkurenca ne postane učinkovita in zmožna vzdrževati nizke cene za uporabnike – stro�kovno naravnane, pri čemer se dejanske cene tudi vnaprej določajo v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in zanje ne veljajo pogoji zagotavljanja odprtega omrežja.
Where an organisation no longer has significant market power in the relevant market, the requirement for costorientation may be set aside by the competent [NRA].
Če določen subjekt na zadevnem trgu nima več pomembne tržne moči, lahko [NRO] prekliče zahtevo po stro�kovni naravnanosti.
One of the aims should be the definition of efficient tariff principles throughout the Community while ensuring a general service for all,
Eden od ciljev bi morala biti opredelitev učinkovitih načel oblikovanja cen v celotni Skupnosti, ob zagotavljanju splo�nih storitev za vse,
— tariffs must be transparent and must be properly published,
– cene morajo biti pregledne in ustrezno objavljene,
— in order to leave users a choice between the individual service elements and where technology so permits, tariffs must be sufficiently unbundled in accordance with
– da bi lahko uporabniki izbirali med posameznimi elementi storitev, morajo biti cene v okviru tehnolo�kih zmožnosti ustrezno razčlenjene v skladu s pravili konkurence iz Pogodbe.
2008 — CASE C-55/06 the competition rules of the Treaty. In particular, additional features introduced to provide certain specific extra services must, as a general rule, be charged independently of the inclusive features and transportation as such,
2008 – ZADEVA C-55/06 jejo dodatne storitve, načeloma zaračunavajo neodvisno od splo�nih značilnosti in prevoza v pravem pomenu,
— tariffs must be non-discriminatory and guarantee equality of treatment, except for restrictions which are compatible with Community law.
– cene ne smejo ustvarjati diskriminacije in morajo zagotavljati enakost obravnavanja, razen če so omejitve tega načela v skladu s pravom Skupnosti.
Any charge for access to network resources or services must comply with the principles set out above and with the competition rules of the Treaty and must also take into account the principle of fair sharing in the global cost of the resources used, the need for a reasonable level of return on investment and, where appropriate, the financing of universal service in accordance with the interconnection Directive.
Pristojbine za dostop do omrežnih naprav in storitev morajo upo�tevati zgoraj navedeni načeli oblikovanja cen in pravila konkurence iz Pogodbe. Poleg tega morajo upo�tevati načelo pravične porazdelitve skupnih stro�kov za uporabljene naprave, nujnost ustreznega donosa od vlaganj in po potrebi financiranje univerzalne storitve v skladu z določbami direktive o medomrežnem povezovanju.
There may be different tariffs, in particular to take account of excess traffic during peak periods and lack of traffic during off-peak periods, provided that the tariff differentials are commercially justifiable and do not conflict with the above principles.’
Določenih je lahko več različnih cen, s čimer se upo�teva dodaten promet v času konic in nižji promet v času izven konic, vendar morajo biti razlike med cenami gospodarsko utemeljene in ne smejo nasprotovati zgoraj navedenim načelom.“
Directive 97/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 1997 on interconnection in Telecommunications with regard to ensuring universal service and interoperability through application of the principles of Open Network Provision
V uvodni izjavi 10 Direktive 97/33/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. junija 1997 o medomrežnem povezovanju v telekomunikacijah glede zagotavljanja univerzalne storitve in medobratovalnosti z uporabo načel zagotavljanja odprtosti omrežij
32), applicable at the time of the facts in the main proceedings, states the following in recital 10 in the preamble thereto:
32), ki je veljala v času nastanka dejstev v postopku v glavni stvari, je določeno:
‘Whereas pricing for interconnection is a key factor in determining the structure and the intensity of competition in the transformation process towards a liberalised market; whereas organisations with significant market power must be able to demonstrate that their interconnection charges are set on the basis of objective criteria and follow the principles of transparency and costorientation, and are sufficiently unbundled in terms of network and service elements offered; whereas publication of a list of interconnection services, charges, terms and conditions enhances the necessary transparency and non-discrimination; whereas flexibility in the methods of charging for interconnection traffic should be possible, including capacity-based charging; whereas the level of charges should promote productivity and encourage efficient and sustainable market entry, and should not be below a limit calculated by the use of long-run incremental cost and cost allocation and attribution methods based on actual cost causation, nor above a limit set by the stand-alone cost of providing the interconnection in question; whereas charges for interconnection based on a price level closely linked to the long-run incremental cost for providing access to interconnection are appropriate for encouraging the rapid development of an open and competitive market.’
„ob upo�tevanju tega, da določitev cen za medomrežno povezovanje odločilno vpliva na strukturo in intenzivnost konkurence ob prehodu na liberaliziran trg; da morajo imeti subjekti s pomembno tržno močjo možnost izkazati, da so njihove pristojbine za medomrežno povezovanje določene v skladu z objektivnimi merili, da sta v njih upo�tevani načeli preglednosti in stro�kovne naravnanosti ter da so dovolj raznolike glede na elemente omrežij in storitev, ki jih nudijo; da objava seznama storitev, cen in oblik medomrežnega povezovanja povečuje nujno preglednost in spodbuja enako obravnavanje; da mora biti oblikovanje cen medomrežnega prometa prožno in temeljiti zlasti na zmogljivosti; da morajo cene spodbujati produktivnost in vstopanje na trg učinkovitih in sposobnih obratovalcev ter da ne smejo biti nižje od ravni, določene na podlagi dolgoročnih mejnih stro�kov in po metodi porazdelitve in dodelitve stro�kov na temelju dejanskih stro�kov, niti vi�je od ravni dejanskih stro�kov zagotavljanja zadevnega medomrežnega povezovanja; da so cene medomrežnega povezovanja, ki so tesno povezane z dolgoročnimi mejnimi stro�ki zagotavljanja dostopa do medomrežnega povezovanja, primerne za spodbujanje hitrega razvoja odprtega in konkurenčnega trga“.
According to Article 1 thereof, Directive 97/33 establishes a regulatory framework for securing in the European Community the interconnection of telecommunications networks and in particular the interoperability of services, and with regard to ensuring provision of universal service in an environment of open and competitive markets.
Člen 1 Direktive 97/33 vzpostavlja regulativni okvir, ki v Evropski skupnosti zagotavlja medomrežno povezovanje telekomunikacijskih omrežij in zlasti medobratovalnost storitev ter izvajanje univerzalne storitve v okolju odprtih in konkurenčnih trgov.
Article 2 of that directive defines the concept of ‘interconnection’ as being the physical and logical linking of telecommunications networks used by the same or a different organisation in order to allow the users of one organisation to communicate with users of the same or another organisation or to access services provided by another organisation.
Člen 2 te direktive pojem „medomrežno povezovanje“ opredeljuje kot „fizično in logično povezovanje telekomunikacijskih omrežij, ki jih uporablja ista ali druga organizacija, da omogoči uporabnikom iz ene organizacije komunikacijo z uporabniki iz iste ali druge organizacije ali dostop do storitev, ki jih zagotavlja druga organizacija“.
Article 7 of that directive, entitled ‘Principles for interconnection charges and cost accounting systems’, provides as follows:
Člen 7 te direktive z naslovom „Načela cen medomrežnega povezovanja in sistema stro�kovnega računovodstva“ določa:
Charges for interconnection shall follow the principles of transparency and costorientation.
Pristojbine za medomrežno povezovanje upo�tevajo načeli preglednosti in stro�kovne naravnanosti.
The burden of proof that charges are derived from actual costs including a reasonable rate of return on investment shall lie with the organisation providing interconnection to its facilities. …
Podjetje, ki s svojimi napravami zagotavlja medomrežno povezovanje, mora dokazati, da so pristojbine določene na podlagi dejanskih stro�kov, vključno s primerno stopnjo donosnosti naložbe. […]
[NRAs] shall ensure the publication, in accordance with Article 14(1), of a reference interconnection offer.
[NRO] v skladu s členom 14(1) zagotovijo objavo referenčne ponudbe medomrežnega povezovanja.
The reference interconnection offer shall include a description of the interconnection offerings broken down into components according to market needs, and the associated terms and conditions including tariffs.
Referenčna ponudba medomrežnega povezovanja vsebuje opis ponudb medomrežnega povezovanja, razčlenjenih na posamezne elemente v skladu s tržnimi potrebami, in ustrezna določila in pogoje, vključno s cenami.
Different tariffs, terms and conditions for interconnection may be set for different categories of organisations which are authorised to provide networks and services, where such differences can be objectively justified on the basis of the type of interconnection provided and/or the relevant national licensing conditions.
Določenih je lahko več različnih cen, določil in pogojev medomrežnega povezovanja za različne kategorije subjektov, ki so poobla�čeni zagotavljati omrežja in storitve, če je mogoče te razlike objektivno utemeljiti na podlagi vrste zagotovljenega medomrežnega povezovanja in/ali pogojev pridobitve zadevne nacionalne licence.
[NRAs] shall ensure that such differences do not result in distortion of competition, and in particular that the organisation applies the appropriate interconnection tariffs, terms and conditions when providing interconnection for its own services or those of its subsidiaries or partners …
[NRO] zagotovijo, da te razlike ne vodijo do izkrivljanja konkurence in zlasti da subjekt pri zagotavljanju medomrežnega povezovanja za svoje storitve ali za storitve svojih odvisnih družb ali družbenikov uporablja ustrezne cene, določila in pogoje medomrežnega povezovanja […].
The [NRA] shall have the ability to impose changes in the reference interconnection offer, where justified.
[NRO] lahko zahteva spremembe referenčne ponudbe medomrežnega povezovanja, če so te utemeljene.
Annex IV provides a list of examples of elements for further elaboration of interconnection charges, tariff structures and tariff elements.
Priloga IV vsebuje seznam primerov elementov, ki jih je mogoče vključiti v pristojbine za medomrežno povezovanje, cenovne strukture in elemente cen.
Where an organisation makes changes to the published reference interconnection offer, adjustments required by the [NRA] may be retrospective in effect, from the date of introduction of the change.
Če subjekt spremeni objavljeno referenčno ponudbo medomrežnega povezovanja, lahko popravki, ki jih zahteva [NRO], učinkujejo za nazaj, in sicer od datuma sprejetja sprememb.
The Commission shall … draw up recommendations on cost accounting systems and accounting separation in relation to interconnection.
Komisija pripravi […] priporočila na področju sistemov stro�kovnega računovodstva in ločenega računovodstva na področju medomreženga povezovanja.
[NRAs] shall ensure that the cost accounting systems used by the organisations concerned are suitable for implementation of the requirements of this Article, and are documented to a sufficient level of detail, as indicated in Annex V.
[NRO] morajo zagotoviti, da sistemi stro�kovnega računovodstva, ki jih uporabljajo zadevni subjekti, ustrezajo izvajanju pogojev iz tega člena in da se opirajo na ustrezno razčlenjene listine, kot so tiste, ki so navedene v Prilogi V.
[NRAs] shall ensure that a description of the cost accounting system, showing the main categories under which costs are grouped and the rules used for the allocation of costs to interconnection, is made available on request.
[NRO] morajo zagotoviti, da je na zahtevo na voljo opis sistema stro�kovnega računovodstva, ki prikazuje vsaj glavne kategorije, po katerih so stro�ki razvr�čeni v skupine, in pravila, ki se uporabljajo za razporeditev stro�kov medomrežnega povezovanja.
Compliance with the cost accounting system shall be verified by the [NRA] or another competent body, independent of the telecommunications organisation and approved by the [NRA].
Skladnost s stro�kovnim računovodstvom preverja [NRO] ali drug usposobljeni organ, ki deluje neodvisno od telekomunikacijskega podjetja in ga potrdi [NRO].
Annex IV to Directive 97/33, entitled ‘List of examples of elements for interconnection charges’, is worded as follows:
Priloga IV k Direktivi 97/33 z naslovom „Seznam primerov elementov pristojbin za medomrežno povezovanje“ določa:
‘Interconnection charges refer to the actual charges payable by interconnected parties.
„‚Pristojbine za medomrežno povezovanje‘ so dejanske pristojbine, ki jih plačujejo stranke medomrežnih povezav.
The tariff structure refers to the broad categories into which interconnection charges are divided, e.g.
‚Struktura cen‘ pomeni �ir�e kategorije, na katere so razčlenjene pristojbine za medomrežno povezovanje, in sicer: