natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
From the Ombudsman’s perspective, the Charter is groundbreaking in recognising, for the fi first time, the right to good administration as a fundamental right of Union citizenship (Article 41).
S stališča varuha človekovih pravic je Listina prelomna, saj prvičpriznava pravico do dobrega upravljanja kot temeljno pravico državljanstva Un' e (člen 41).
I constantly remind the EU institutions and bodies that good administration requires much more of civil servants than merely avoiding unlawful behaviour.
Instituc' e in organe EU nenehno opozarjam, da dobro upravljanje zahteva od javnih uslužbencev veliko večkot samo izogibanje nezakonitemu ravnanju.
I am happy to report that the EU institutions and bodies worked hard in 2007 to resolve complaints, remedy injustices and rectify mistakes.
Z veseljem poročam, da so si instituc' e in organi EU v letu 2007 zelo prizadevali za reševanje pritožb ter odpravo krivic in napak.
During the year, we saw a doubling in the number of cases se4 led by the institution concerned — an unprecedented 35% of our inquiries were closed a er the relevant institution agreed to se4 le the ma4 er.
V tem letu se je število primerov, ki so jih rešile zadevne instituc' e, podvojilo – kar 35 % naših preiskav je bilo zaključenih, ko je zadevna instituc' a pristala na poravnavo.
No fewer than four concern the European Commission, which acted quickly and constructively to se4 le a range of grievances.
Kar štirje zadevajo Evropsko komis' o, ki se je odzvala hitro in konstruktivno ter rešila niz pritožb.
I must also single out the European Aviation Safety Agency, which for the second year running has produced a star case, demonstrating its willingness to work constructively with the Ombudsman to resolve problems.
Pohvaliti moram tudi Evropsko agenc' o za varnost v letalstvu, ki je že drugo leto zapored ustvarila nadvse uspešen primer in pokazala, da je pripravljena konstruktivno sodelovati z varuhom človekovih pravic pri reševanju težav.
My intention in highlighting these cases is to present models of good administration for all EU institutions and bodies to take inspiration from and to measure their own practices against.
S poudarjanjem teh primerov želim predstaviti modele dobrega upravljanja za vse instituc' e in organe EU, iz katerih lahko ti črpajo navdih in s katerimi lahko primerjajo svoje prakse.
Some of the results that we obtained for citizens and that are documented in this Report were achieved without a formal exchange of correspondence with the institution.
Nekateri rezultati, ki smo jih dosegli za državljane in so navedeni v tem poročilu, so bili doseženi brez uradnega dopisovanja z instituc' o.
We have now reached a stage where our relations with the institutions are such that we can solve a growing number of cases rapidly, avoiding the need for a lengthy inquiry.
Dosegli smo tako raven odnosov z instituc' ami, da lahko hitro rešujemo vedno večje število primerov in se izognemo dolgotrajnim preiskavam.
I have begun to make wider use of more informal procedures to help resolve problems in a flexible way and will continue to develop this approach in 2008.
Začel sem uporabljati čedalje več neformalnih postopkov, da bi pripomogel k prožnemu reševanju težav, in ta pristop bom razv' al tudi v letu 2008. Menim, da je to prelomnica za našo instituc' o, kar dokazuje, kolikšno je spoštovanje varuha človekovih pravic in koliko so instituc' e pripravljene pomagati državljanom.
ANNUAL REPORT 2007
LETNO PORO Č ILO 2007
Once again in 2007, 15% of cases were closed with a critical remark because the institution concerned failed to live up to the standards of service that citizens are entitled to receive.
Tudi v letu 2007 je bilo 15 % primerov zaključenih s kritično pripombo, ker zadevne instituc' e pri storitvah niso dosegle standardov, do katerih so državljani upravičeni.
They range from one institution refusing to change its recruitment procedures, essentially for reasons of its own administrative convenience, to another excessively delaying an infringement procedure without o� ering any specific explanations as to why.
Med njimi sta primer, ko je instituc' a zavrnila spremembo postopkov zaposlovanja, predvsem zato, ker ji je to upravno ustrezalo, in drug primer, ko je instituc' a čezmerno odlašala postopek za ugotavljanje kršitve, ne da bi za to zagotovila ustrezno obrazložitev.
We will again produce a follow-up report to these critical remarks in 2008 to ensure that the institutions learn from them.
Leta 2008 bomo spet pripravili poročilo o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi s temi kritičnimi pripombami, da bi zagotovili, da se instituc' e iz njih kaj nauč' o.
It is clear that there is still work to be done in promoting the principles of good administration within the EU institutions and bodies.
Seveda delo pri spodbujanju načel dobrega upravljanja v instituc' ah in organih EU še ni končano.
To help develop useful strategies in this regard, I convened a workshop in Brussels in November 2007 which saw a lively exchange of views on how the European Ombudsman can help make the right to good administration a reality.
Da bi prispeval k razvoju uporabnih strateg' v zvezi s tem, sem novembra 2007 v Bruslju sklical delavnico, na kateri je potekala živahna izmenjava mnenj o tem, kako lahko evropski varuh č lovekovih pravic prispeva k uresničitvi pravice do dobrega upravljanja.
I ended my introduction to the 2006 Annual Report by highlighting my dual aim for the year ahead, namely, working with the institutions to promote good administration and refocusing my communication e� orts so that all those who might need to make use of the European Ombudsman’s services are properly informed of how to do so.
Uvod v letno poročilo 2006 sem sklenil tako, da sem poudaril svoj dvojni cilj za naslednje leto, in sicer sodelovati z instituc' ami pri spodbujanju dobrega upravljanja in preusmeriti prizadevanja pri obveščanju javnosti, da bodo lahko vsi, ki bodo morda potrebovali storitve evropskega varuha č lovekovih pravic, ustrezno obveščeni, kako naj to stor' o.
A key development in this regard in 2007 was the adoption of the European Network of Ombudsmen Statement.
Ključni dosežek na tem področju v letu 2007 je bilo sprejetje izjave Evropske mreže varuhov č lovekovih pravic.
The aim of the Statement is to make the EU dimension of the work of ombudsmen be4 er known and to clarify the service that members of the Network provide to people who complain about ma4 ers within the scope of EU law.
Cilj izjave je izboljšati obveščenost o razsežnosti dela varuhov č lovekovih pravic, povezani z EU, in podrobneje pojasniti storitve, ki jih člani mreže zagotavljajo ljudem, ki se pritožujejo zaradi zadev znotraj zakonodaje EU.
The guide should enable a greater proportion of complainants to address directly the body best equipped to deal with their complaint.
Vodnik naj bi omogočil večjemu deležu pritožnikov, da pritožbo naslov' o neposredno na organ, ki je najbolje usposobljen za njeno obravnavo.
It also means that complaints are resolved more promptly and e � ectively, thus ensuring that citizens can fully enjoy their rights under EU law.
Pomeni tudi, da se pritožbe rešujejo hitreje in učinkoviteje, s čimer se zagotovi, da lahko državljani v celoti izkorist' o svoje pravice v skladu z zakonodajo EU.
A final important consideration is that, by reducing the proportion of inadmissible complaints that it receives, my institution will be be4 er able to fulfil its core role — that of helping citizens who are unhappy with the way they have been treated by the EU institutions and bodies.
Nazadnje pa je pomembno to, da bo moja instituc' a z zmanjšanjem deleža nedopustnih pritožb lahko bolje uresničevala svojo ključno nalogo – pomagati državljanom, ki niso zadovoljni s tem, kako jih obravnavajo instituc' e in organi EU.
The results that my o ce is able to achieve for such citizens are, without a doubt, the most satisfying aspect of my work.
Rezultati, ki jih lahko moj urad doseže za te državljane,
As I have o en said, the Annual Report is the Ombudsman’s most important publication.
Kot pogosto poudarjam, je letno poročilo najpomembnejša publikac' a varuha človekovih pravic.
It enables him to provide an account of his work to the European Parliament, to which he reports.
Evropski parlament, ki mu varuh poroča, z njim obvešča o svojem delu.
It serves as a resource to the EU institutions and bodies in helping them to improve their administration.
Za instituc' e in organe EU je vir, s katerim si pomagajo pri izboljševanju svojega upravljanja.
It makes the Ombudsman’s work accessible to the wide range of people who wish to follow his activities, including the general public, the media, academics, civil servants and colleagues from ombudsman o ces around the world.
Širokemu krogu ljudi, ki žel' o spremljati dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic, vključno z javnostjo, med' i, akademskimi krogi, javnimi uslužbenci in kolegi iz uradov varuhov človekovih pravic, omogoča dostop do njegovega dela.
Changes have been made to the Report in recent years to improve its user-friendliness.
Poročilo se je v zadnjih letih spreminjalo, da bi postalo pr' aznejše za uporabnika.
The Report consists of six chapters and four annexes.
Poročilo je sestavljeno iz šestih poglav'in štirih prilog.
It starts with a personal introduction by the Ombudsman, in which he highlights the most notable developments of the past year and looks to the year ahead.
Začne se z uvodom, v katerem varuh č lovekovih pravic povzema najpomembnejše dogodke lanskega leta in predstavlja dejavnosti v naslednjem letu.
Chapter 3 consists of a selection of summaries of the Ombudsman’s decisions for 2007, covering the range of subjects and institutions involved in complaints and own-initiative inquiries.
V poglavju 3 so zbrani povzetki sklepov varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2007, ki vključujejo vrsto področ' in instituc' , vpletenih v pritožbe in preiskave na lastno pobudo.
The summaries are organised first by the type of finding or outcome and then by the institution or body concerned.
Povzetki so najprej razvrščeni glede na ugotovitev ali rezultat, potem pa še glede na zadevno instituc' o ali organ.
The chapter ends with a summary of a decision following an own-initiative inquiry and an example of a query submi4 ed by a national ombudsman.
Poglavje se zaključi s povzetkom sklepov po preiskavi na lastno pobudo in primerom vprašanja, ki ga je predložil nacionalni varuh človekovih pravic.
Chapter 4 concerns relations with other institutions and bodies of the European Union.
V poglavju 4 so obravnavani odnosi z drugimi instituc' ami in organi Evropske un' e.
It begins by outlining the value of the Ombudsman’s constructive working relations with the institutions and bodies, and goes on to list the various meetings and events that took place in this regard in 2007.
Začne se z opisom pomena konstruktivnih delovnih odnosov varuha človekovih pravic z instituc' ami in organi, nadaljuje pa s pregledom srečanj in prireditev, ki so potekali v letu 2007.
The chapter is divided into six sections, covering the year’s highlights, the Ombudsman’s information visits, conferences and meetings involving the Ombudsman and his sta�, media relations, publications and online communications.
Razdeljeno je na šest razdelkov, ki vključujejo najpomembnejše dogodke leta, varuhove informativne obiske, konference in srečanja, na katerih so sodelovali varuh in njegovo osebje, odnose z med' i, objave in spletno komunikac' o.
The o ce of European Ombudsman was established by the Maastricht Treaty as part of the citizenship of the European Union.
Urad evropskega varuha človekovih pravic je bil ustanovljen z Maastrichtsko pogodbo v okviru pravic iz državljanstva Evropske un' e.
The Ombudsman investigates complaints about maladministration in the activities of Community institutions and bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the
Varuh preučuje pritožbe o nepravilnostih pri delu instituc'
ANNUAL REPORT 2007
LETNO PORO Č ILO 2007 in organov Skupnosti, razen Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Sodišča prve stopnje v njuni pravosodni funkc' i.
As well as responding to complaints from individuals, companies and associations, the Ombudsman works proactively, launching inquiries on his own initiative, meeting with Members and o cials of the EU institutions and bodies, and reaching out to citizens to inform them about their rights and about how to exercise those rights.
Poleg tega da se varuh človekovih pravic odziva na pritožbe posameznikov, družb in združenj, deluje tudi proaktivno, kar pomeni, da sproža preiskave na lastno pobudo, organizira srečanja s č lani in uslužbenci instituc'in organov EU, ugotovitve posreduje državljanom ter jih obvešča o njihovih pravicah in tem, kako jih uveljaviti.
As in previous years, most of the inquiries concerned the European Commission (413, or 64% of the total).
Kot v prejšnjih letih se je tudi tokrat večina preiskav (413 ali 64 % vseh) nanašala na Evropsko komis' o.
Given that the Commission is the main Community institution that makes decisions having a direct impact on citizens, it is normal that it should be the principal object of citizens’ complaints.
Ker je Komis' a osrednja instituc' a Skupnosti, ki sprejema odločitve, ki neposredno vplivajo na državljane, ni čudno, da je glavni predmet pritožb državljanov.
There were 87 inquiries (14% of the total) concerning the European Personnel Selection O ce (EPSO), 59 (9%) concerning the European Parliament, 22 (3%) concerning the European Anti-Fraud O ce, and 8 (1%) concerning the Council of the European Union.
87 preiskav (14 % vseh) se je nanašalo na Evropski urad za izbor osebja (EPSO), 59 (9 %) Evropski parlament, 22 (3 %) Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam in osem (1 %) Svet Evropske un' e.
The main types of maladministration alleged were lack of transparency, including refusal of information (in 28% of cases), unfairness or abuse of power (18%), unsatisfactory procedures (13%), avoidable delay (9%), discrimination (8%), negligence (8%), legal error (4%), and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is, failure by the European Commission to carry out its role as “guardian of the Treaty” vis-à-vis the Member States (3%).
V glavnem so se domnevne nepravilnosti nanašale na nepreglednost, vključno z zavračanjem posredovanja podatkov (28 % primerov), nepravičnost ali zlorabo pooblastil (18 %), nezadovoljive postopke (13 %), nepotrebne zamude (9 %), diskriminac' o (8 %), malomarnost (8 %), pravne napake (4 %) in neizpolnjevanje obveznosti, tj. neuspešnost Komis' e pri opravljanju vloge „varuha Pogodbe“ v odnosu do držav članic (3 %).
The main e-mail account of the Ombudsman was used to reply to a total of 7 273 e-mails requesting information in 2007.
Z glavnega elektronskega naslova varuha človekovih pravic je bilo v letu 2007 odgovorjeno na 7 273 elektronskih pisem s prošnjami za informac' e.
Of these, 3 127 were mass mailings submi4 ed by citizens and concerned complaints already received by the European Ombudsman, while 4 146 constituted individual requests for information.
Od tega so državljani poslali 3 127 množičnih pisem, povezanih s pritožbami, ki jih je evropski varuh človekovih pravic že prejel, 4 146 pa je bilo posameznih prošenj za informac' e.
In total, therefore the Ombudsman handled 10 484 complaints and information requests from citizens during the year in question.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v zadevnem letu torej skupno obravnaval 10 484 pritožb in prošenj državljanov za informac' e.
In 2007, 95 cases were closed with a finding of no maladministration.
Leta 2007 je bilo 95 primerov zaključenih z ugotovitv' o, da nepravilnosti ni bilo.
This is not necessarily a negative outcome for the complainant, who at least benefits from receiving a full explanation from
To ni nujno negativen izid za pritožnika, ki od zadevne instituc' e ali organa vsaj prejme temeljito obrazložitev
!The Ombudsman received a complaint alleging that the European Commission had wrongly failed to take action against Ireland for possible infringement of the EU Habitats Directive.
Varuh človekovih pravic je prejel pritožbo o domnevni nepravilnosti Evropske komis' e, ker ni ukrepala proti Irski zaradi mogoče kršitve Direktive EU o habitatih.
The complainant also complained about the Commission’s decision not to take further action on arguments relating to possible infringement of the Waste Directive.
Pritožnik se je pritožil tudi v zvezi z odločitv' o Komis' e, da ne bo naprej ukrepala glede trditev, povezanih z mogočo kršitv' o direktive o odpadkih.
The Ombudsman found that the Commission had provided a reasonable explanation of its strategic role in relation to the implementation of these Directives.
Varuh človekovih pravic je ugotovil, da je Komis' a zagotovila ustrezno obrazložitev svoje strateške vloge pri uresničevanju teh direktiv.
He also noted that the Commission had given the complainant relevant useful advice in this case. (3660/2004/PB)
Ugotovil je tudi, da je Komis' a v tem primeru pritožniku ustrezno in uporabno svetovala. (3660/2004/PB)
!A complainant to the Ombudsman alleged, inter alia, lack of transparency and undue delay by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) in response to concerns she had raised with it about an antidepressant’s safety and suicide risk.
Neka pritožnica je varuhu človekovih pravic predložila pritožbo, v kateri je Evropski agenc' i za zdravila (EMEA) med drugim očitala nepreglednost in nepotrebno zamudo, kar zadeva njeno zaskrbljenost glede varnosti nekega antidepresiva in tveganja za samomor.
The complainant’s husband had commi4 ed suicide while taking that drug, and the complainant had contacted the Agency with several questions and requests for information.
Mož te pritožnice je napravil samomor med zdravljenjem s tem zdravilom, zato je na Agenc' o naslovila več vprašanj in prošenj za informac' e.
In the course of the inquiry, the Agency apologised to the complainant for the fact that it had not replied to certain of her questions and provided answers to these questions.
Med preiskavo se je Agenc' a pritožnici opravičila, ker ji ni odgovorila na nekatera vprašanja, in ji na ta vprašanja nato tudi odgovorila.
While the complainant remained dissatisfied, the Ombudsman took the view that the Agency’s action had removed the concerns he had identified and that there was no longer any maladministration. (2370/2005/OV)
Pritožnica še vedno ni bila zadovoljna, varuh človekovih pravic pa je menil, da je Agenc' a odpravila pomisleke, ki jih je navedel, s tem pa tudi vse nepravilnosti. (2370/2005/OV)
!Greenpeace complained to the Ombudsman, alleging that the Commission had made inaccurate, misleading and defamatory accusations in relation to a study the NGO had issued on the question of “revolving doors” between the Commission and the lobbying chemical industry.
Organizac' a Greenpeace je varuhu človekovih pravic predložila pritožbo, v kateri je Komis' i očitala neresnične, zavajajoče in klevetniške obtožbe v zvezi s štud' o, ki jo je nevladna organizac' a objavila o vprašanju „vrtljivih vrat“ med Komis' o in lob' em kemične industr' e.
Even if the Ombudsman does not find maladministration, he may identify an opportunity for the institution or body to improve the quality of its administration in the future.
Tudi če varuh človekovih pravic ne odkr' e nepravilnosti, lahko poišče način, kako v prihodnje izboljšati upravljanje instituc' ali organov.
!A Polish environmental NGO alleged that the European Investment Bank (EIB) had acted contrary to its own “Environmental Statement” when it co-financed a road modernisation project in Poland.
Poljska nevladna organizac' a za okolje je trdila, da je Evropska investic' ska banka (EIB) ravnala v nasprotju z lastno „okoljsko izjavo“, ko je sofinancirala projekt posodobitve cest na Poljskem.
However, given that the complainant had submi4 ed a parallel complaint to the Polish Ombudsman, the European Ombudsman encouraged the EIB to consider establishing channels of communication with, and seeking information from, relevant national and regional control bodies, such as ombudsmen.
Ker pa je pritožnik predložil vzporedno pritožbo tudi poljskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, je evropski varuh človekovih pravic spodbudil EIB, naj razmisli o vzpostavitvi komunikac' skih poti z ustreznimi nacionalnimi in regionalnimi nadzornimi organi, kot so varuhi človekovih pravic, in pridobivanju informac' pri teh organih.
These bodies could serve as additional sources of information concerning compliance of EIB-fi financed projects with national and European law. (1779/2006/MHZ)
Ti organi bi se lahko uporabljali kot dodatni viri informac' o skladnosti projektov, ki jih financira EIB, z nacionalno in evropsko zakonodajo. (1779/2006/MHZ)
Cases se4led by the institution and friendly solutions
Primeri, ki jih je rešila instituc' a sama, in sporazumne rešitve
Whenever possible, the Ombudsman tries to achieve a positive-sum outcome that satisfies both the complainant and the institution complained against.
Varuh človekovih pravic si, če je le mogoče, prizadeva doseči rezultat, s katerim sta zadovoljna pritožnik in instituc' a, zoper katero je vložena pritožba.
The co-operation of the Community institutions and bodies is essential for success in achieving such outcomes, which help enhance relations between the institutions and citizens and can avoid the need for expensive and timeconsuming litigation.
Pri doseganju takih rezultatov, ki pripomorejo h krepitvi odnosov med instituc' ami in državljani ter k izogibanju dragim in dolgotrajnim sodnim postopkom, je bistveno sodelovanje instituc' in organov Skupnosti.
During 2007, 129 cases were se4 led by the institution or body itself following a complaint to the Ombudsman.
Leta 2007 so na podlagi pritožbe varuhu človekovih pravic instituc' e ali organi sami rešili 129 primerov.
This is twice the number of cases se4 led in 2006 and reflects a growing willingness on the part of the institutions and bodies to see complaints to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to put right mistakes that have occurred and to co-operate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of citizens.
To je dvakrat večod tako rešenih primerov v letu 2006 in pomeni vedno večjo pripravljenost instituc' in organov, da v pritožbah varuhu človekovih pravic prepoznajo priložnost za odpravljanje storjenih napak in sodelovanje z varuhom v korist državljanov.
!A er a German university complained about a payment dispute it was having with the Commission regarding a project under the Erasmus Programme, the Ombudsman contacted the Commission, which se4 led the case within two weeks.
Po pritožbi nemške univerze glede spora o plačilu, ki ga je imela s Komis' o zaradi projekta v okviru programa Erasmus, je varuh človekovih pravic navezal stik s Komis' o, in ta je primer rešila v dveh tednih.
The university’s e� orts to convince the
Prizadevanja univerze, da bi Komis' o prepričala o storjeni računski napaki, so bila neuspešna.
!The Commission reimbursed an outstanding sum of EUR 88 000 to a French consulting firm, which claimed that the institution had not repaid the entire eligible costs for its participation in an Information Society Technologies programme with China.
Komis' a je povrnila neplačani znesek v višini 88 000 EUR francoskemu svetovalnemu podjetju, ki je trdilo, da mu ta instituc' a ni povrnila vseh upravičenih stroškov za sodelovanje pri programu Tehnolog' e informac' ske družbe s Kitajsko.
The Commission argued that the complainant had made a mistake in its cost statements.
Komis' a je trdila, da je pritožnik napravil napako pri obračunu stroškov.
In some cases, a friendly solution can be achieved if the institution or body concerned o� ers compensation to the complainant.
V nekaterih primerih je sporazumna rešitev mogoča, če zadevna instituc' a ali organ pritožniku ponudi odškodnino.
Among the cases involving a friendly solution in 2007 were the following:
Med primeri s sporazumno rešitv' o iz leta 2007 so bili naslednji.
!The Commission accepted the Ombudsman’s proposal for a friendly solution and reduced the amount to be recovered from a contractor involved in a project in Lebanon.
Komis' a je sprejela predlog varuha človekovih pravic za sporazumno rešitev in je znižala znesek, ki naj bi ga izterjala od pogodbenika, sodelujočega pri projektu v Libanonu.