natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition, in the Spanish case, the national authorities undertook to remove for the future the unlimited state guarantee beneting the public service broadcaster.
Poleg tega so se v španskem primeru nacionalni organi zavezali, da bodo v prihodnosti ukinili neomejeno državno jamstvo, ki koristi storitvam javne radiodifuzije.
Request for information on existing aid r d
Zahteve po informacijah o obstoječi pomoči
March, the Commission requested clarications(
Komisija je 3. marca zahtevala pojasnila(231) Nemčije, Irske in Nizozemske o vlogi in nanciranju storitev javne radiodifuzije.
Having examined allegations from several complainants, the Commission’s preliminary view was that the current nancing system in those Member States is no longer in line with the EU rules requiring Member States not to grant subsidies liable to distort competition (Article 88 EC).
Komisija je po preučitvi trditev več pritožnikov predhodno menila, da sedanji sistem financiranja v teh državah članicah ni več v skladu s pravili EU, ki od držav članic zahtevajo, da ne dodelijo subvencij, ki bi lahko izkrivljale konkurenco (člen 88 ES).
Case E 10/2005 (France) Licence fee, Commission decision of 20.4.2005.
Zadeva E 10/2005 (Francija), Licenčnina, Odločba Komisije z dne 20.4.2005.
Case E 9/2005 (Italy) Capital and other measures — RAI, Commission decision of 20.4.2005.
Zadeva E 9/2005 (Italija), Kapitalski in drugi ukrepi – RAI, Odločba Komisije z dne 20.4.2005.
Case E 8/2005 (Spain) Spanish national public broadcaster RTVE, Commission decision of 20.4.2005.Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
Zadeva E 8/2005 (Španija), Španska nacionalna radijska in televizijska postaja RTVE, Odločba Komisije z dne 20.4.2005.Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str.
1).Communication from the Commission on the application of state aid rules to public service broadcasting (OJ C 320, 15.11.2001).
1).Sporočilo Komisije o uporabi pravil državne pomoči pri storitvah javne radiodifuzije (UL C 320, 15.11.2001).
III — State aid control question that public broadcasters may oer online services as part of their public service mission.
Komisija ne dvomi, da javne radijske in televizijske postaje lahko ponujajo spletne storitve kot del njihovega poslanstva javne storitve.
However, the scope of such online activities and whether they are financed by public funds should be determined not by the public broadcasters themselves but by the Member States concerned, to ensure that only those services are included which serve the same democratic, social and cultural needs of society as traditional broadcasting.
Vendar pa obsega takšnih spletnih dejavnosti in tega, ali se nan-cirajo z javnimi sredstvi, ne bi smele določati javne radijske in televizijske postaje same, ampak zadevne države članice, da se zagotovi vključitev samo tistih storitev, ki služijo enakim demokratičnim, socialnim in kulturnim potrebam družbe kot tradicionalne radijske in televizijske postaje.
Funding of a new French international news channel(
Financiranje novega francoskega mednarodnega programa poročil(
It was therefore not possible to conclude that the budget forecast reected the costs of a well-run and adequately equipped company.
Zato ni mogoče skleniti, da proračunska napoved odraža stroške dobro upravljane in primerno opremljene družbe.
However, the Commission found that the project oered adequate guarantees that the principles of Article 86(2) would be complied with.
Vendar je Komisija menila, da projekt zagotavlja zadostna jamstva za spoštovanje načel člena 86(2).
In this respect, the Commission had to take into account the specicities of the project, namely that the parent companies of the new channel would be the French public broadcaster, France Télévision, and the main French commercial broadcaster, TF1.
Komisija je morala v zvezi s tem upoštevati posebnosti projekta, in sicer, da bosta matični družbi novega programa francoska javna radijska in televizijska postaja, France Télévision, in glavna francoska komercialna postaja, TF1.
In particular, the project included detailed rules in case the channel made a prot, with a view to preventing the parent companies from unduly obtaining a share of that prot. e Commission was also satised with the project’s safeguards against the risk that the channel might not behave according to normal market conditions in the commercial area (e.g. advertising) and towards its shareholders.
Projekt je za primer dobičkonosnosti programa vključeval podrobna pravila, da bi tako matičnima družbama preprečili neupravičeno pridobivanje deleža dobička. Komisija je bila zadovoljna tudi z zaščito projekta pred tveganjem, da program ne bo ravnal v skladu z normalnimi tržnimi pogoji na komercialnem področju (npr. oglaševanje) in do svojih delničarjev.
Hessicher Investitionsfonds (Germany)(
Hessicher Investitionsfonds (Nemčija)(
On the 6th September, the Commission authorised the transfer of the Hessian Investment Fund (HIF), a special fund of the Land of Hessen, as unlimited silent partnership participation to Landesbank Hessen-üringen (Helaba), a German regional
Komisija je 6. septembra odobrila prenos družbe Hessian Investment Fund (HIF), posebnega sklada dežele Hessen, kot tihe družbe z neomejeno odgovornostjo na družbo Landesbank Hessen-üringen (Helaba), nemško javno regionalno banko.
Case N 54/2005 International news channel CFII, Commission decision of 7.6.2005.Case N 248/2004 Hessicher Investitionsfonds, Commission decision of 6.9.2005.
Prenos za družbo Helaba ni pomenil dodatne likvidnosti ali priliva dohodka.
Report on Competition Policy 2005 public bank. e transfer did not result in an injection of liquidity or inow of revenue for Helaba.
Kljub temu bi prenos povečal lasten kapital družbe Helaba.
Nevertheless, the transfer of the fund would strengthen Helaba’s own-capital basis. e Commission concluded that the remuneration agreed by the Land of Hessen in return for the assets corresponded to the normal return on investment that a private investor would expect. e transaction did not therefore constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1).
Komisija je sklenila, da je plačilo, s katerim se je dežela Hessen strinjala v zameno za premoženje, v skladu z običajnim donosom vlaganj, ki bi ga pričakoval zasebni vlagatelj. Transakcija zato ni državna pomoč v smislu člena 87(1).
In its scrutiny of individual regional aid cases, which are approved outside any schemes, directly on the basis of the EC Treaty provisions, the Commission takes into account a higher risk of distortion of competition compared with aid based on authorised regional aid schemes.
Komisija pri pregledu primerov individualne regionalne pomoči, odobrene zunaj vsake sheme in neposredno na podlagi določb Pogodbe ES, upošteva večjo nevarnost izkrivljanja konkurence v primerjavi s pomočjo, ki temelji na odobrenih shemah regionalne pomoči.
In accordance with Section 2 of the regional aid guide-lines(237), in order to justify the compatibility of ad hoc regional aid with the internal market, the positive impact on development of the region in question must demonstrably outweigh the distortion of competition caused by the aid.
V skladu z oddelkom 2 Smernic regionalne pomoči(237) mora za upravičenost združljivosti namenske (ad-hoc) regionalne pomoči z notranjim trgom pozitivni učinek na razvoj zadevne regije dokazljivo prevladati nad izkrivljanjem konkurence, ki je posledica pomoči.
Case NN 71/2005 Capital increase in HSH Nordbank, Commission decision of 6.9.2005.Case NN 72/2005 Capital increase in BayernLB, Commission decision of 6.9.2005.Guidelines on national regional aid (OJ C 74, 10.3.1998).Case N 492/2004 Regional development aid in favour of SABIC (OJ C 176, 16.7.2005).
Zadeva N 248/2004, Hessicher Investitionsfonds, Odločba Komisije z dne 6.9.2005.Zadeva NN 71/2005, Povečanje kapitala v HSH Nordbank, Odločba Komisije z dne 6.9.2005.Zadeva NN 72/2005, Povečanje kapitala v BayernLB, Odločba Komisije z dne 6.9.2005.Smernice o nacionalni regionalni pomoči (UL C 74, 10.3.1998).
Despite it being ad hoc in nature, the Commission found that the aid was compatible with the common market as the Dutch authorities had demonstrated that the investment would have a sizeable eect on the whole region, which has traditionally been closely connected with the chemical industry. e fact that the investment concerned headquarters rather than production capacity did not alter this assessment.
Komisija je kljub temu, da je šlo za namensko pomoč, ugotovila, da je pomoč združljiva s skupnim trgom, saj so nizozemski organi dokazali, da bi imela naložba pomemben učinek na celotno regijo, ki je tradicionalno tesno povezana s kemično industrijo. Dejstvo, da je naložba zadevala sedež družbe in ne njenih proizvodnih zmogljivosti, te ocene ni spremenilo.
All the other conditions of the regional aid guidelines were also ful-lled.
Prav tako so bili izpolnjeni vsi drugi pogoji Smernic regionalne pomoči.
On the 20th July, the Commission authorised individual regional aid to Lignit Hodonín, the operator of a Czech lignite mine situated in an area assisted under Article 87(3)(a). e aid of CZK 155.5 million (EUR 5 million) covers investment for opening new lignite deposits which will safeguard 350 direct jobs in a primarily agricultural region suering from high unemployment and structural diculties.
Komisija je 20. julija odobrila individualno regionalno pomoč za družbo Lignit Hodonín, upravitelja češkega rudnika lignita, na območju, ki prejema pomoč na podlagi člena 87(3)(a). Pomoč v višini 155,5 milijona CZK (5 milijonov EUR) vključuje vlaganja za odpiranje novih nahajališč lignita, ki bodo zavarovala 350 neposrednih delovnih mest v pretežno kmetijski regiji, ogroženi zaradi visoke brezposelnosti in strukturnih težav.
Due to specicities of lignite trading and a relatively low level of production by Lignit Hodonín, the distortive eects on competition and trade between Member States are in this particular case fairly limited. e Commission authorised the ad hoc aid as being compatible with the common market since its eects on the region’s social cohesion and economic development outweigh any distortions of competition.
Zaradi posebnosti trgovanja z lignitom in sorazmerno nizke ravni proizvodnje družbe Hodonín, so učinki, ki izkrivljajo konkurenco in trgovino med državami članicami, v tem primeru precej omejeni. Komisija je ad-hoc pomoč odobrila kot združljivo s skupnim trgom, saj učinki na socialno kohezijo in gospodarski razvoj regije prevladajo nad izkrivljanjem konkurence.
In 2001, the Commission approved about EUR 35 million of investment aid to Kronoply’s production plant for oriented strand boards (wood panels used mainly in the construction business) in the German region of Brandenburg on the basis of the 1998 multisectoral framework.
Komisija je leta 2001 odobrila okoli 35 milijonov EUR pomoči za naložbe proizvodnemu obratu družbe Kronoply za Oriented Strand Boards (lesene plošče, ki se v glavnem uporabljajo v gradbeništvu) v nemški regiji Brandenburg na podlagi Večsektorskega okvira iz leta 1998.
In 2003, Germany notied an increase in the amount of aid of about EUR 4 million.
Nemčija je leta 2003 priglasila zvišanje zneska pomoči za približno 4 milijone EUR.
In the final decision adopted on 21 September, the Commission maintained its position that Kronoply’s production plant was a viable economic operation because Kronoply had continued its operations aer the approval of the lower aid amount in 2001.
Komisija je v končni odločbi, sprejeti 21. septembra, vztrajala pri stališču, da je proizvodni obrat družbe Kronoply rentabilen obrat, sposoben preživetja, saj je družba Kronoply nadaljevala s poslovanjem po odobritvi nižjega zneska pomoči leta 2001.
As further aid would not provide any incentives for regional development in this case, the Commission concluded that the exemptions of Article 87(2) and (3) were not applicable. e notied additional aid measure therefore constituted incompatible operating aid which should not be implemented.
Ker nadaljnja pomoč v tem primeru ne bi zagotovila nobenih spodbud za regionalni razvoj, je Komisija sklenila, da izjeme od člena 87(2) in (3) ne veljajo. Priglašeni ukrep dodatne pomoči je zato pomenil nezdružljivo pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, ki se ne bi smela izvajati.
Case N 597/2004 Lignit Hodonín, s.r.o.
Zadeva N 492/2004, Regionalna razvojna pomoč, namenjena SABIC (UL C 176, 16.7.2005).Zadeva N 597/2004, Lignit Hodonín, s.r.o.
(OJ C 250, 8.10.2005).Case C 5/2004 Aid in favour of Kronopoly GmbH.
(UL C 250, 8.10.2005).Zadeva C 5/2004, Pomoč, namenjena Kronoply GmbH.
In December 2003 the German authorities notied, in accordance with the 1998 multisectoral framework, investment aid to E-Glass AG, Osterweddingen, Saxo-ny-Anhalt (Germany) — an assisted area under Article 87(3)(a). e purpose of the project was to build a new plant for the production of raw float glass.
Nemški organi so decembra 2003 v skladu z Večsektorskim okvirom iz leta 1998 priglasili pomoč za naložbe družbi E-Glass AG, Osterweddingen, Saška-Anhalt (Nemčija) – območje, ki prejema pomoč v okviru člena 87(3)(a). Namen tega projekta je bila gradnja novega obrata za proizvodnjo surovega float stekla.
On the 20th April 2004, the Commission approved the aid project with eligible costs of EUR 121 million and an aid intensity of 35 % gross.
Komisija je 20. aprila 2004 odobrila projekt pomoči s 121 milijoni EUR upravičenih stroškov in z intenzivnostjo pomoči 35 % bruto.
Since the new information could have had an inuence on the maximum allowable aid intensity, it had to be considered a determining factor for the decision within the meaning of Article 9 of the procedural regula-tion(242).
Ker bi lahko nove informacije vplivale na največjo dovoljeno intenzivnost pomoči, jih je treba upoštevati kot odločujoč dejavnik za odločbo v smislu člena 9 Postopkovne uredbe(242).
In its judgment of the 1st December 2004, the CFI annulled the decision in a proceeding launched by a competitor. e main reason was that the Commission had analysed only data on capacity utilisation and not also whether the relevant market was in decline by using data on apparent consumption.
Sodišče prve stopnje je v svoji sodbi z dne 1. decembra 2004 v postopku, ki ga je sprožil konkurent, odločbo razveljavilo. Glavni razlog je bil ta, da je Komisija analizirala samo podatke o izkoriščenosti zmogljivosti in ne tudi, ali upoštevni trg z uporabo podatkov o resnični porabi upada.
Following a detailed analysis, the Commission decided on 20 July to take a new decision to open the formal investigation procedure, in particular as there were diculties assessing the maximum allowable aid intensity and determining the relevant markets.
Komisija se je na podlagi podrobne analize 20. julija odločila, da bo sprejela novo odločitev o uvedbi formalnega postopka preiskave, zlasti, ker je bilo težko oceniti največjo dovoljeno intenzivnost pomoči in določiti upoštevne trge.
On the 23th November, the Commission prohibited, under the state aid rules, the implementation of a proposed German aid scheme to exempt housing companies in
Komisija je 23. novembra v okviru pravil državnih pomoči prepovedala izvajanje predlagane nemške sheme pomoči o izvzetju stanovanjskih družb na trgu dela regije Berlin iz davka na prenos nepremičnin v primeru združitev in prevzemov.
Case C 12/2005 E-Glass AG.Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p.
Zadeva C 12/2005, EGlass AG.Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 z dne 22. marca 1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES (UL L 83, 27.3.1999, str.
1).Case C 28/2005 Aid in favour of Glunz AG (OJ C 263, 22.10.2005).Case C 40/2004 Real estate transfer tax exemption for housing companies in the new Länder.
1).Zadeva C 28/2005, Pomoč, namenjena Glunz AG (UL C 263, 22.10.2005).Zadeva C 40/2004, Oprostitev davka na promet nepremičnin za stanovanjske družbe v novih nemških deželah.
III — State aid control the labour market region of Berlin from real estate transfer tax in case of mergers and acquisitions. e declared objective of the scheme was to restructure the housing market in the labour market region of Berlin as this market was characterised by oversupply.
Ker shema ni bila usmerjena na tako imenovana „zapostavljena območja“ z visokimi stopnjami socialne izključenosti, je Komisija menila, da je davčna oprostitev, ki pokriva celoten Berlin, nesorazmerno obsežna, in da izkrivljanja konkurence, ki iz tega izhaja, ni mogoče upravičiti v okviru člena 87(1) ES.
As the scheme was not targeted at so-called ‘pockets of deprivation’ where high levels of social exclusion exist, the Commission considered that a tax exemption covering the whole of Berlin was disproportionately wide, and the resultant distortion of competition could not be justied under Article 87(1) EC. ose parts of the scheme that were restricted to the other new German Länder (Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and uringia) had already been approved by the Commission.
Dele sheme, ki so bili omejeni na druge nove nemške dežele (Brandenburg, Mecklenburg - Predpomorjansko, Saška, Saška - Anhalt in Turingija), je Komisija že odobrila.
In the present case, however, the Commission’s examination showed that the scheme proposed by Germany was not proportionate to the objective as the benets would be available to all housing companies owning real estate in the labour market region of Berlin whereas only certain districts are in fact in need of regeneration.
V tem primeru pa je preiskava Komisije pokazala, da shema, ki jo je predlagala Nemčija, ni bila sorazmerna s ciljem, saj bi bile ugodnosti na voljo vsem stanovanjskim družbam na trgu dela regije Berlin, ki imajo v posesti nepremičnine, medtem ko samo nekatera območja dejansko potrebujejo regeneracijo.
In December 2004, the Commission decided to raise no objections to those parts of the scheme that were restricted to the other new German Länder. e scheme was approved in view of the particular handicaps in the new Länder, the limited degree of distortion of competition and the expected positive eects on the housing market.
Komisija se je decembra 2004 odločila, da ne bo nasprotovala tistim delom sheme, ki so omejeni na druge nove nemške dežele. Shema je bila odobrena z vidika posebnih pomanjkljivosti v teh novih deželah, omejene stopnje izkrivljanja konkurence in pričakovanih pozitivnih učinkov na stanovanjski trg.
In accordance with point 5.6 of the guidelines on regional aid, Finland and Greece notied adjustments to the aid intensity rates for some of their regions, demonstrating that the socio-economic data for these regions had worsened in comparison with other similar regions.
V skladu s točko 5.6 Smernic o regionalni pomoči sta Finska in Grčija priglasili prilagoditve deležev intenzivnosti pomoči za nekatere njune regije, ki so pokazali, da so se socialno-ekonomski podatki za te regije v primerjavi z drugimi podobnimi regijami poslabšali.
Case N 331/2004 Amendment of the regional aid map in Finland 2000–06 (OJ C 223, 10.9.2005).Case N 236/2005 Amendment of the Greek regional aid map.Net grant equivalent.
Zadeva N 331/2004, Sprememba nacionalnih kart državnih regionalnih pomoči na Finskem 2000–2006 (UL C 223, 10.9.2005).Zadeva N 236/2005, Sprememba nacionalnih kart državnih regionalnih pomoči v Grčiji.Net grant equivalent.
R & D aid to the aeronautical sector (Italy)( )
Pomoč za raziskave in razvoj v letalskem sektorju (Italija)(249
Case N 126/2005 Individual R & D aid to BIAL (OJ C 275, 8.11.2005).Case C 61/2003 Italian aeronautical law No 808/85 (OJ C 252, 12.10.2005).OJ C 45, 17.2.1996. 150
Zadeva N 126/2005, Individualna pomoč za raziskave in razvoj družbi BIAL (UL C 275, 8.11.2005).Zadeva C 61/2003, Italijanski letalski zakon št. 808/85 (UL C 252, 12.10.2005).UL C 45, 17.2.1996.
Aid to newly created or technology-oriented small and medium-sized enterprises
Pomoč za na novo ustanovljena ali tehnološko usmerjena mala in srednja podjetja
On the 3rd May, the Commission authorised an aid scheme in Germany amounting to approximately EUR 120 million per year for newly created or technolo-gy-oriented small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) using the services of technology centres, incubators and industrial centres. e scheme will provide public support for the creation or development of such centres, with companies using the services of the centres being the indirect beneciaries.
Komisija je 3. maja odobrila shemo pomoči v Nemčiji, v višini približno 120 milijonov EUR na leto, za na novo ustanovljena ali tehnološko usmerjena mala in srednja podjetja, ki uporabljajo storitve tehnoloških centrov, inkubatorjev in industrijskih centrov. Shema bo zagotovila javno podporo za ustanovitev in razvoj takšnih centrov, kjer bodo podjetja, ki bodo uporabljala storitve teh centrov, posredni upravičenci.
In its decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure on the 18th February 2004, the Commission expressed doubts as to whether the measure was compatible with the common market, as Germany had not provided sucient information as to whether state aid was involved at all levels of the scheme, particularly at the level of the owners of the centres and the SMEs using the services of the centres, or whether all aid was passed through to the said SMEs.
Komisija je v svoji odločitvi o uvedbi formalnega postopka preiskave dne 18. februarja 2004 izrazila dvome o tem, ali je ukrep združljiv s skupnim trgom, saj Nemčija ni zagotovila zadostnih informacij o tem, ali je bila državna pomoč vključena na vseh ravneh sheme, zlasti na ravni lastnikov centrov in malih in srednjih podjetij, ki uporabljajo storitve teh centrov, oziroma ali je celotna pomoč pripadla navedenim malim in srednjim podjetjem.
In the course of the formal investigation procedure, Germany amended its original notication and ensured that all aid would be passed through to the enterprises using the services of the centres.
Med formalnim postopkom preiskave je Nemčija spremenila svojo prvotno priglasitev in zagotovila, da bo celotna pomoč pripadla podjetjem, ki uporabljajo storitve centrov.
As Germany committed itself to respecting all the requirements of Commission regulations on de mini-
Ker se je Nemčija zavezala, da bo izpolnila vse zahteve Uredb
252) and aid to SMEs(
252) in o pomoči malim in srednjim podjetjem,(
253), the Commission considered that the aid did not mis aid( threaten to distort competition in the single market and was therefore compatible with Article 87 EC. e approved measure was based on Part II, point 7 of the framework plan for the joint federal government–Länder programme for improving regional economic structures and runs until the 31st December 2006.
Komisije o pomoči de minimis( je Komisija menila, da pomoč ne bo povzročila izkrivljanja konkurence na enotnem trgu in je zato združljiva s členom 87 ES. Odobreni ukrep je temeljil na točki 7 dela II okvirnega načrta za skupni „Program zvezne vlade in dežel za izboljšanje regionalnih gospodarskih struktur“ in velja do 31. decembra 2006.
On the 20th October, the Commission opened a formal investigation pursuant to Article 88(2) into a proposal by the United Kingdom to spend GBP 3.8 million (approximately EUR 4.38 million) to set up ‘Investbx’, a market for equity investments in
Komisija je 20. oktobra na podlagi člena 88(2) uvedla formalno preiskavo v zvezi s predlogom Združenega kraljestva o porabi 3,8 milijona EUR (približno 4,38 milijona EUR) za ustanovitev „Investbx“, trga za kapitalske naložbe v mala in srednja podjetja na območju West Midlands.
Case C 3/2004 Technology centres (OJ L 295, 11.11.2005).
Sredstva bodo namenjena zgolj ustanovitvi in upravljanju Investbx.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of the 12
Zadeva C 3/2004, Tehnološki centri (UL L 295, 11.11.2005).Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 ES pri de minimis pomoči (UL L 10, 13.1.2001, str.