natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Court has previously held that Law No 230/62 must serve as a measure of comparison to determine whether the new system applying to former foreignlanguage assistants is similar to the general system applying to the national workforce or whether, on the contrary, it affords them a lower level of protection (Case C-212/99 Commission v Italy, paragraph 25).
Kot je Sodi�če že odločilo, mora biti zakon �t. 230/62 zaradi primerjave namenjen nadzoru tega, ali je ureditev, ki velja za nekdanje lektorje za tuji materni jezik, ki so postali jezikoslovni sodelavci, podobna splo�ni ureditvi za vse domače delavce ali, nasprotno, zanje velja nižja raven varstva (zgoraj navedena sodba z dne 26. junija 2001 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji, točka 25).
If national workers are entitled, under Law No 230/62, to reinstatement from the point of view of increases in salary, seniority and the payment by the employer of social security contributions, from the date of their original recruitment, former foreignlanguage assistants who have become linguistic associates must also be entitled to similar reinstatement with effect from the date of their original recruitment (Case C-212/99 Commission v Italy, paragraph 30).
Če imajo domači delavci na podlagi zakona �t. 230/62 pravico do obnovitve svoje kariere z vidika povi�anja plače, delovne dobe in prispevkov za socialno varnost, ki jih je plačal delodajalec, od dneva svoje prve zaposlitve, morajo imeti tudi nekdanji lektorji za tuji jezik, ki so postali jezikoslovni sodelavci, pravico do podobne obnovitve z učinkom od dneva njihove prve zaposlitve (zgoraj navedena sodba z dne 26. junija 2001 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji, točka 30).
It has, however, to be borne in mind that application of Law No 230/62 to national workers presupposes continuance of the employment relationship between employer and workers.
Vendar je treba opozoriti, da se pri uporabi zakona �t. 230/62 za domače delavce predpostavlja nadaljevanje delovnih razmerij med delodajalcem in delavci.
The documents submitted to the Court show that Ms Delay’s contract of employment as an exchange assistant expired on 31 October 1994 and that her contract of employment as a linguistic associate was not concluded until 28 December, two months later.
Iz spisa, ki je bil predložen Sodi�ču, izhaja, da je pogodba o zaposlitvi za lektorja na izmenjavi N. Delay potekla 31. oktobra 1994 in da je bila njena pogodba za jezikoslovnega sodelavca sklenjena �ele 28. decembra 1994, torej dva meseca pozneje.
It is for the national court, which alone has jurisdiction to assess the facts and to interpret the national legislation, to determine whether there exists any continuity linking the duties performed by Ms Delay as an exchange assistant in the service of the Università degli studi di Firenze and those entrusted to her as a linguistic associate by that university.
Nacionalno sodi�če, ki je edino pristojno za presojo dejstev in za razlago nacionalne zakonodaje, mora ugotoviti obstoj stalne zveze med nalogami, ki jih je opravljala N. Delay, ko je bila zaposlena na Università degli studi di Firenze kot lektorica na izmenjavi, in tistimi, ki ji jih je ista univerza naložila kot jezikoslovni sodelavki.
In carrying out that assessment, the national court must determine, first, whether the duties involved in the work carried out by exchange assistants are the same as those involved in the work carried out by linguistic associates, having particular regard to
Navedeno sodi�če mora pri presoji preveriti, prvič, ali imata poklicna dejavnost, ki jo opravljajo lektorji na izmenjavi, in poklicna dejavnost, ki jo opravljajo jezikoslovni sodelavci, enako funkcionalno vsebino, zlasti v zvezi z opredelitvijo pedago�kih
DELAY the definition of the pedagogical profile of the foreignlanguage teaching courses and to the evaluation of the students’ knowledge and, second, whether the two kinds of duties in question meet the same teaching needs of Italian universities.
DELAY vrednosti jezikovnih tečajev in v zvezi s preizkusi znanja �tudentov, in, drugič, ali obe vrsti zadevnih nalog zadovoljujeta iste potrebe poučevanja na italijanskih univerzah.
If the national court should find that there is continuity linking the duties of an exchange assistant and those of a linguistic associate performed by Ms Delay, despite the temporary interruption of the employment relationship with her employer, it would be necessary to consider whether a national worker placed in a comparable situation would have been entitled, pursuant to Law No 230/62, to the recognition of rights acquired since the date of his first recruitment.
Delay opravljala kljub začasni prekinitvi delovnega razmerja s svojim delodajalcem, bi bilo treba nujno preučiti, ali bi bile domačemu delavcu v primerljivem položaju na podlagi zakona �t. 230/62 priznane vse njegove pravice, ki jih je pridobil od dneva svoje prve zaposlitve.
So far as more particularly concerns the effects of an interruption of the employment relationship, it is to be emphasised that, in paragraph 28 of its judgment in Case C-212/99 Commission v Italy, the Court held that only an analysis concentrating on the substance, rather than the form, of statutory schemes will make it possible to establish whether their actual application to different categories of workers in comparable legal situations leads to situations which are compatible or, in contrast, incompatible with the fundamental principle of nondiscrimination on grounds of nationality.
Še podrobneje, v zvezi z učinki prekinitve delovnega razmerja je treba poudariti, da je Sodi�če v točki 28 zgoraj navedene sodbe z dne 26. junija 2001 v zadevi Komisija proti Italiji odločilo, da je mogoče le s podrobno analizo vsebine, in ne oblike zakonskih ureditev ugotoviti, ali njihova dejanska uporaba za različne kategorije delavcev, ki so postavljeni v primerljive pravne položaje, vodi do položajev, ki so združljivi ali, nasprotno, nezdružljivi s temeljnim načelom prepovedi diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva.
Having regard to all the foregoing considerations, the reply to be given to the question referred must be that it is contrary to Article 39(2) EC that, when a fixedterm contract of employment as an exchange assistant is replaced by a contract of employment for an indefinite period as a linguistic associate, a person in the position of the applicant in the main proceedings should be refused recognition of the rights acquired since the date of her first recruitment, with consequences with regard to remuneration, the account to be taken of seniority and the payment, by the employer, of contributions to a social security scheme, inasmuch as a national worker placed in a comparable situation would have been entitled to such recognition.
Ob upo�tevanju navedenih preudarkov je treba na postavljeno vpra�anje odgovoriti, da člen 39(2) ES nasprotuje temu, da se osebi, ki je v takem položaju kot tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari, ob zamenjavi pogodbe o zaposlitvi za določen čas lektorja na izmenjavi s pogodbo o zaposlitvi za nedoločen čas jezikoslovnega sodelavca zavrne priznanje pravic, pridobljenih od dneva njene prve zaposlitve, glede povi�anja plače, delovne dobe in prispevkov za socialno varnost, ki jih je plačal delodajalec, ker bi bil domači delavec v primerljivem položaju deležen ugodnosti takega priznanja.
It is for the national court to ascertain whether that is so in the case in the main proceedings.
Predložitveno sodi�če mora preveriti, ali gre v postopku v glavni stvari za tak primer.
It is contrary to Article 39(2) EC that, when a fixedterm contract of employment as an exchange assistant is replaced by a contract of employment for an indefinite period as a linguistic associate, a person in the position of the applicant in the main proceedings should be refused recognition of the rights acquired since the date of her first recruitment, with consequences with regard to remuneration, the account to be taken of seniority and the payment, by the employer, of contributions to a social security scheme, inasmuch as a national worker placed in a comparable situation would have been entitled to such recognition.
Člen 39(2) ES nasprotuje temu, da se osebi, ki je v takem položaju kot tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari, ob zamenjavi pogodbe o zaposlitvi za določen čas lektorja na izmenjavi s pogodbo o zaposlitvi za nedoločen čas jezikoslovnega sodelavca in strokovnjaka za materni jezik zavrne priznanje pravic, pridobljenih od dneva njene prve zaposlitve, glede povišanja plače, delovne dobe in prispevkov za socialno varnost, ki jih je plačal delodajalec, ker bi bil domači delavec v primerljivem položaju deležen ugodnosti takega priznanja.
It is for the national court to ascertain whether that is so in the case in the main proceedings.
Predložitveno sodišče mora preveriti, ali gre v postopku v glavni stvari za tak primer.
Case C-91/05
Zadeva C-91/05
Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti proti Svetu Evropske unije
(Action for annulment — Article 47 EU — Common foreign and security policy — Decision 2004/833/CFSP — Implementation of Joint Action 2002/589/CFSP — Combating the proliferation of small arms and light weapons — Community competence — Development cooperation policy)
„Ničnostna tožba – Člen 47 EU – Skupna zunanja in varnostna politika – Sklep 2004/833/SZVP – Izvajanje Skupnega ukrepa 2002/589/SZVP – Boj proti �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra – Pristojnost Skupnosti – Politika razvojnega sodelovanja“
I - 3655Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 20 May 2008 . . . . . . . . . . .
Mengozzija, predstavljeni 19. septembra 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
European Union — Common foreign and security policy — Powers of the Community judicature — Acts adopted under Title V of the Treaty on European Union
Evropska unija – Skupna zunanja in varnostna politika – Pristojnost sodišča Skupnosti – Akti, sprejeti na podlagi naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji
(Arts 230 EC and 241 EC; Arts 46(f) EU and 47 EU)
(člena 230 ES in 241 ES; člen 46(f) EU in člen 47 EU)
SUMMARY — CASE C-91/05
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-91/05
European Union — Common foreign and security policy — Acts adopted under Title V of the Treaty on European Union
Evropska unija – Skupna zunanja in varnostna politika – Akti, sprejeti na podlagi naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji
(Art. 47 EU)
(člen 47 EU)
Development cooperation — Competence of the Community — Extent — Measures to combat the proliferation of small arms and light weapons
Razvojno sodelovanje – Pristojnost Skupnosti – Okvir – Ukrepi dejavnosti proti širjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra
(Art. 177 EC)
(člen 177 ES)
European Union — Common foreign and security policy — Combating the proliferation of small arms and light weapons
Evropska unija – Skupna zunanja in varnostna politika – Boj proti širjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra
an act adopted under Title V of the EU Treaty brought by a Community institution under Article 230 EC and, in that context, to consider the pleas invoked in accordance with Article 241 EC in so far as they allege an infringement of Article 47 EU.
ki jo je vložila institucija Skupnosti v skladu s členom 230 ES, in v tem okviru za obravnavanje tožbenih razlogov, navedenih na podlagi člena 241 ES, kolikor se ti nana�ajo na kr�itev člena 47 EU.
It follows from Article 46(f) EU that the provisions of the EC Treaty concerning the powers of the Court and the exercise of those powers are applicable to Article 47 EU.
V zvezi s tem iz člena 46(f) EU izhaja, da se določbe Pogodbe ES, ki se nana�ajo na pristojnost Sodi�ča in na izvajanje te pristojnosti, uporabljajo za člen 47 EU.
Under the latter article, none of the provisions of the EC Treaty is to be affected by a provision of the EU Treaty.
Na podlagi tega člena nobena določba Pogodbe EU ne vpliva na določbe Pogodbe ES.
(see paras 31-34)
(Glej točke od 31 do 34.)
It is therefore the task of the Court to ensure that acts which, according to the Council, fall within the scope of Title V of the EU Treaty and which, by their nature, are capable of having legal effects, do not encroach upon the powers conferred by the EC Treaty on the Community.
Sodi�če mora paziti, da akti, za katere Svet trdi, da se zanje uporablja naslov V Pogodbe EU, in ki imajo lahko pravne učinke, ne posegajo v pristojnosti, ki jih določbe Pogodbe ES priznavajo Skupnosti.
It follows that the Court has jurisdiction to consider an action for annulment of
Iz tega izhaja, da je Sodi�če pristojno za odločanje o ničnostni tožbi zoper akt, sprejet v okviru naslova V Pogodbe EU,
A measure having legal effects adopted under Title V of the EU Treaty affects the provisions of the EC Treaty within the meaning of Article 47 EU whenever it could have been adopted on the basis of the EC Treaty, it being unnecessary to examine whether the measure prevents
Akt, ki ima pravne učinke in je bil sprejet na podlagi naslova V Pogodbe EU, vpliva na določbe Pogodbe ES v smislu člena 47 EU, ker bi bil lahko sprejet na podlagi Pogodbe ES, ne da bi bilo treba preveriti, ali ta akt Skupnosti preprečuje ali omejuje izvr�evanje njenih pristojnosti. Če je namreč očitno, da je glavni
COMMISSION v COUNCIL competence, and not its exclusive or shared nature.
KOMISIJA PROTI SVETU dodelitev in torej obstoj te pristojnosti, ne na njeno izključnost ali deljenost.
(see paras 60-62) or limits the exercise by the Community of its competences. If it is established that the provisions of a measure adopted under Titles V or VI of the EU Treaty, on account of both their aim and their content, have as their main purpose the implementation of a policy conferred by the EC Treaty on the Community, and if they could properly have been adopted on the basis of the EC Treaty, those provisions will infringe Article 47 EU.
cilj določb akta, sprejetega na podlagi naslova V in naslova VI Pogodbe EU, glede na njihov namen in vsebino uresničitev politike, ki je na podlagi Pogodbe ES dodeljena Skupnosti, pri čemer bi bile te določbe lahko prav tako veljavno sprejete na podlagi navedene pogodbe, da so bile te določbe sprejete v nasprotju s členom 47 EU.
Since the infringement of Article 47 EU arises from the fact that a measure having legal effects adopted by the Union on the basis of the EU Treaty could have been adopted by the Community, it is also not relevant whether, in an area which does not fall within the exclusive competence of the Community and in which, therefore, the Member States are not precluded from exercising, individually or collectively, their competences, such a measure could have been adopted by the Member States in exercise of their competences.
Kadar kr�itev člena 47 EU izhaja iz dejstva, da bi akt, ki ima pravne učinke in ga je sprejela Unija na podlagi Pogodbe EU, lahko sprejela Skupnost, ni več upo�tevno vpra�anje, ali bi lahko tak akt – na področju, ki ne spada v izključno pristojnost Skupnosti in na katerem državam članicam zato ni preprečeno skupno ali posamično izvr�evanje njihovih pristojnosti – sprejele države članice pri izvr�evanju svojih pristojnosti.
While the objectives of current Community development cooperation policy should not be limited to measures directly related to the campaign against poverty, it is none the less necessary, if a measure is to fall within that policy, that it contributes to the pursuit of that policy’s economic and social development objectives.
Čeprav ciljev sedanje politike Skupnosti na področju razvojnega sodelovanja ni treba omejiti na ukrepe, ki se neposredno nana�ajo na boj proti rev�čini, mora ukrep, da ga je mogoče uvrstiti v okvir te politike, vendarle prispevati k zasledovanju ciljev gospodarskega in socialnega razvoja navedene politike.
In that regard, it is apparent from a number of documents emanating from the Union institutions and from the European Council that certain measures aiming to prevent fragility in developing countries, including those adopted in order to combat the proliferation of small arms and light weapons, can contribute to the elimination or reduction of obstacles to the economic and social development of those countries.
V zvezi s tem iz več dokumentov institucij Unije in Evropskega sveta izhaja, da nekateri ukrepi, namenjeni preprečevanju �ibkosti držav v razvoju, vključno s tistimi, ki so bili sprejeti na področju dejavnosti proti �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra, lahko prispevajo k odstranitvi ali zmanj�anju ovir pri gospodarskem in socialnem razvoju navedenih držav.
Moreover, the question whether the provisions of such a measure adopted by the Union fall within the competence of the Community relates to the attribution and, thus, the very existence of that
Poleg tega se vpra�anje, ali so določbe takega akta, ki ga je sprejela Unija, v pristojnosti Skupnosti, nana�a na
Nevertheless, a concrete measure aiming to combat the proliferation of small arms and light weapons may be adopted by the Community under its development cooperation policy only if that measure, by virtue both of its aim and its content,
Vendar ostaja dejstvo, da lahko Skupnost sprejme konkretni ukrep proti �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra v okviru svoje politike razvojnega sodelovanja, le če ta ukrep po svojem namenu
SUMMARY — CASE C-91/05 falls within the scope of the competences conferred by the EC Treaty on the Community in that field.
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-91/05 in svoji vsebini spada v pristojnosti, ki jih Skupnosti na tem področju daje Pogodba ES.
That is not the case if such a measure, even if it contributes to the economic and social development of the developing country, has as its main purpose the implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the Union.
To ne velja, kadar je glavni namen ukrepa uresničitev SZVP, čeprav prispeva k gospodarskemu in socialnemu razvoju držav v razvoju.
(see paras 67, 68, 71, 72)
(Glej točke 67, 68, 71 in 72.)
or which has several components, without one being incidental to the other, where various legal bases of the EC Treaty are applicable, that measure will have to be founded, exceptionally, on the various corresponding legal bases.
z drugim le stranski, razsodilo, da mora, če je mogoče, uporabiti različne pravne podlage Pogodbe ES, izjemoma temeljiti na različnih ustreznih pravnih podlagah.
However, under Article 47 EU, such a solution is impossible with regard to a measure which pursues a number of objectives or which has several components falling, respectively, within development cooperation policy, as conferred by the EC Treaty on the Community, and within the CFSP, and where neither one of those components is incidental to the other.
Vendar je taka re�itev na podlagi člena 47 EU izključena glede ukrepa, ki sledi več ciljem ali ki ima več sestavnih delov, ki spadajo na področje politike razvojnega sodelovanja, ki je na podlagi Pogodbe ES v pristojnosti Skupnosti, in na področje SZVP, ne da bi bili nekateri stranski.
Since Article 47 EU precludes the Union from adopting, on the basis of the EU Treaty, a measure which could properly be adopted on the basis of the EC Treaty, the Union cannot have recourse to a legal basis falling within the CFSP in order to adopt provisions which also fall within a competence conferred by the EC Treaty on the Community.
Ker namreč člen 47 EU prepoveduje, da bi Unija na podlagi Pogodbe EU sprejela ukrep, ki bi bil lahko veljavno sprejet na podlagi Pogodbe ES, se Unija za sprejetje določb, ki prav tako spadajo v pristojnost, ki jo Pogodba ES priznava Skupnosti, ne more sklicevati na pravno podlago, ki se nana�a na SZVP.
Decision 2004/833 implementing Joint Action 2002/589/CFSP with a view to a European Union contribution to the Economic Community of West African States in the framework of the Moratorium on Small Arms and Light Weapons contains, taking account of its aim and its content, two components, neither of which can be considered to be incidental to the other, one falling within Community development cooperation policy and the other within the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP).
Sklep Sveta 2004/833 o izvajanju Skupnega ukrepa 2002/589/SZVP z namenom prispevanja Evropske unije Gospodarski skupnosti zahodnoafri�kih držav v okviru moratorija na lahko orožje in orožje malega kalibra glede na namen in vsebino vključuje dva sestavna dela, ne da bi bil eden v razmerju do drugega stranski, pri čemer spada eden v politiko Skupnosti na področju razvojnega sodelovanja, drugi pa v skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko (SZVP).
It follows that the Council infringed Article 47 EU by adopting Decision 2004/833 on the basis of Title V of the EU Treaty, since that decision also falls within development cooperation policy.
Iz tega sledi, da je Svet s tem, ko je Sklep 2004/833 sprejel na podlagi naslova V Pogodbe EU, čeprav ta prav tako spada na področje politike razvojnega sodelovanja, kr�il člen 47 EU.
With regard to a measure which simultaneously pursues a number of objectives
Sodi�če je glede ukrepa, ki hkrati zasleduje več ciljev ali ima več sestavnih delov, ne da bi bil eden v primerjavi
(see paras 75-77, 108, 109)
(Glej točke od 75 do 77, 108 in 109.)
MENGOZZIdelivered on 19 September 2007
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI GENERALNEGA PRAVOBRANILCAPAOLA MENGOZZIJA, predstavljeni 19. septembra 2007 1
II — Legal context and background to the dispute ....................................
II – Pravni okvir in dejansko stanje ................................................
B — The contested Joint Action ..............................................
B – Sporni skupni ukrep ....................................................
C — The contested decision .................................................
C – Izpodbijani sklep .......................................................
III — Forms of order sought and procedure before the Court ...........................
III – Predlogi strank in postopek pred Sodi�čem .....................................
Admissibility of the application for annulment of the contested decision ..
Dopustnost predloga za razglasitev ničnosti izpodbijanega sklepa ........
Admissibility of the plea of illegality of the contested Joint Action ........
Dopustnost ugovora nezakonitosti spornega skupnega ukrepa ...........
I - 3665 a) Arguments of the parties .........................................
I - 3665 a) Trditve strank ..................................................
Admissibility of a plea of illegality raised by a privileged applicant against a regulation pursuant to Article 241 EC .................
Dopustnost ugovora nezakonitosti na podlagi člena 241 ES, na katerega se zoper uredbo sklicuje privilegirana tožeča stranka ....
I - 3666 ii) Admissibility of a plea of illegality raised against a joint action adopted on the basis of Title V of the EU Treaty. ................
I - 3666 ii) Dopustnost ugovora nezakonitosti, ki se uveljavlja zoper skupni ukrep, sprejet na podlagi Naslova V Pogodbe EU ................
Interpretation and scope of Article 47 EU .............................
Razlaga in obseg člena 47 EU .........................................
I - 3674 a) Arguments of the parties .........................................
I - 3674 a) Trditve strank ..................................................
Relationship between the campaign against the proliferation of small arms and light weapons and Community competence ........................
Razmerje med dejavnostjo proti �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra ter pristojnostmi Skupnosti ...................................
I - 3686 a) Arguments of the parties .........................................
I - 3686 a) Trditve strank ..................................................
Introductory remarks ........................................
Uvodne ugotovitve ..........................................
I - 3687 ii) Scope of development cooperation ............................
I - 3687 ii) Področje uporabe razvojnega sodelovanja ......................
I - 3690 iii) Combating the proliferation of small arms and light weapons and development cooperation ....................................
I - 3690 iii) Dejavnost proti �irjenju lahkega orožja in orožja malega kalibra ter razvojno sodelovanje ........................................