natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In addition to new rounds of negotiations with the Russian Federation, a seminar on judicial cooperation in criminal matters, attended by practitioners and representatives from the European Commission and the Russian Federation, was held at Eurojust in October.
Poleg novih krogov pogajanj z Rusko federacijo je Eurojust oktobra organiziral tudi seminar o pravosodnem sodelovanju na področju kazenskih zadev, ki so se ga udeležili praktiki ter predstavniki Evropske komisije in Ruske federacije.
The seminar dealt with extradition, transfer of criminal proceedings and MlA.
Udeleženci seminarja so razpravljali o izročitvi, prenosu kazenskih postopkov in medsebojni pravni pomoči.
One outcome of the seminar was to create a working group to solve practical issues regarding judicial cooperation between the European Union and the Russian authorities.
Sprejet je bil sklep o oblikovanju delovne skupine, ki bo reševala praktična vprašanja glede pravosodnega sodelovanja med EU in pristojnimi ruskimi organi.
force (thus facilitating the exchange of data in operational cases) with norway, Iceland and the USA.
leg sporazuma s Hrvaško so v veljavi (torej omogočajo izmenjavo osebnih podatkov v zadevah) sporazumi o sodelovanju z Norveško, Islandijo in Združenimi državami Amerike.
On 26 June 2009, Eurojust and norway held their annual consultation on the implementation of the cooperation agreement.
Eurojust in Norveška sta 26. junija 2009 organizirala redno letno posvetovanje o implementaciji sporazuma o sodelovanju.
It was concluded that cooperation had intensified and that it was advisable to continue with the secondment of the liaison Prosecutor at Eurojust.
Delegaciji sta ocenili, da se je sodelovanje okrepilo in bi bila nadaljne sodelovanje in prisotnost norveškega tožilca za zvezo na sedežu Eurojusta dobrodošla.
The cooperation agreements signed with Switzerland and fYROM in november 2008 will enter into force when written notification that all internal procedures have been completed is exchanged.
Sporazuma o sodelovanju s Švico in z nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedoni-jo, ki sta bila podpisana novembra 2008, bosta stopila v veljavo po obojestranskem pisnem uradnem obvestilu, da so bili zaključeni vsi interni postopki.
Michèle Coninsx, Eurojust, Viviane Reding, Vice-President, European Commission, Francisco Caamaño Domínguez, Minister of Justice, Spain, and Antonio Costa, Executive Director, UNODC
Michèle Coninsx, Eurojust, Viviane Reding, podpredsednica Evropske komisije, Francisco Caamaño Domínguez, španski minister za pravosodje in Antonio Costa, izvršni direktor UNODC-a oseb za pravosodno sodelovanje v državah Srednje in Južne Amerike.
In 2009, Eurojust added a contact point in the Republic of Korea to its third State network.
Preliminarni pogovori o pogajanjih za sklenitev sporazumov o sodelovanju so potekali s Srbijo ter z bosno in Hercegovino.
In 2009, Eurojust also finalised negotiations with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UnODC).
Leta 2009 so bila zaključena tudi pogajanja med Eurojustom in Uradom ZN za boj proti mamilom in kriminalu (UNODC).
A Memorandum of Understanding between Eurojust and the UnODC was signed on 26 February 2010.
Pismo o nameri med Eurojustom in Uradom ZN za boj proti mamilom in kriminalu je bilo podpisano 26. februarja 2010.
The cooperation agreement with Croatia, signed in 2007, entered into force on 02 June 2009, and a liaison prosecutor was appointed to Eurojust in november 2009.
Leta 2009 je Eurojust svoji mreži kontaktnih oseb v tretjih državah pridružil še kontaktno osebo iz Republike Koreje.
On 24 June 2009, Eurojust’s application for observer status was unanimously accepted by the FATF.
Po-poln seznam kontaktnih oseb je naveden na spletni strani Eurojusta.
A Memorandum of Understanding was signed with the Iberoamerican network of International legal Cooperation (Iber-RED), a network of contact points for judicial cooperation in Central and South America, on 04 May 2009.
4. maja 2009 je bilo podpisano Pismo o nameri med Eurojustom in Latinsko-ame-riško mrežo za pravosodno sodelovanje (Iber-RED) oziroma mrežo kontaktnih
Administrative issues human resources control systems.
Administrativne zadeve dno s še enim večjim projektom v Eurojustu, Pregledom organizacijske strukture (OSR).
6,700 payment transactions and 950 commitments were processed during 2009.
V letu 2009 je bilo obdelanih približno 6700 transakcij in 950 nalog.
Total budget execution for 2009 was €25.2 million.
Celotna poraba proračunskih sredstev v letu 2009 je znašala 25,2 milijonov evrov.
Eurojust received the statement of assurance from the Court of Auditors regarding its accounts for 2008.
Računsko sodišče je potrdilo Eurojustovo poslovodstvo za leto 2008.
An assessment phase started in spring 2009 with an analysis of the current management structure, focusing on the overall corporate governance system and on realignment of administrative workflows with Eurojust’s operational work.
Spomladi 2009 se je začela faza ocenjevanja, vključno z analizo sedanje strukture vodenja, s poudarkom na celotnem sistemu upravljanja in uskladitvi administrativnih delovnih procesov z operativnim delom v Eurojustu.
Workshops were held with national Members and members of the administration to further common understanding of management processes.
Zaradi boljšega splošnega razumevanja procesov upravljanja smo organizirali delavnice za nacionalne predstavnike in administrativno osebje.
The results of the assessment phase of the OSR will be considered during the second quarter of 2010.
Rezultate ocenjevalne faze v okviru Pregleda organizacijske strukture bomo obravnavali v drugem trimesečju leta 2010.
Housing continued to be an important issue in 2009.
V letu 2009 je bilo še vedno nerešeno vprašanje prostorov Eurojusta.
Because of its increasing workload, Eurojust has been located in two separate buildings in The Hague since 2008.
Zaradi naraščajočega obsega dela so od leta 2009 naprej prostori Eurojusta na dveh različnih lokacijah v Haagu.
In October 2009, the Ministry of Justice of the netherlands and the Municipality of The Hague presented a proposal for possible locations for new premises, which would allow all Eurojust staff to work in one building. negotiations on the future premises are ongoing, and various substantial issues remain unresolved.
Oktobra 2009 sta nizozemsko ministrstvo za pravosodje in mesto Haag predlagala možne lokacije za nove prostore, kjer bi lahko vsi Eurojustovi zaposleni delali v eni zgradbi. Še naprej potekajo pogovori o prihodnjih prostorih, pri čemer so še vedno nerešena različna pomembna vprašanja.
In 2010, Eurojust will establish a programme to deal with the detailed projects for the new premises.
Leta 2010 bo Eurojust uvedel program za obravnavo konkretnih projektov v zvezi z novimi prostori.
Implementation of the new Eurojust Decision (see chapter 4) started in parallel with another major project at Eurojust, the OSR.
Implementacija novega Sklepa o Eurojustu (glej poglavje 4) se je začela vzpore-
Eurojust was granted a budget of €22.5 million in 2009. The amending budget, granted in September 2009, added another €3.9 million.
V letu 2009 je bil Eurojustu odobren proračun v višini 22,5 milijonov evrov, v septembru 2009 pa še dodatna sredstva v
The EPOC software has been used as the Eurojust CMS since October 2004.
Od oktobra 2004 naprej uporabljajo uporabniki Eurojustovega CMS-a programsko opremo EPOC, ki je rezultat treh projektov (EPOC I do III). Te projekte je sofinancirala Evropska komisija.
Following the successful completion of EPOC III, Eurojust initiated the EPOC III+ Project to refine the software.
Po uspešnem zaključku projekta EPOC III, je Eurojust uvedel projekt EPOC III+ zaradi izpopolnjevanja programske opreme.
All funding for EPOC III+ has been provided by Eurojust.
Vsa finančna sredstva za projekt EPOC III+ je zagotovil Eurojust.
EPOC III+ was launched in April 2008 with the aim of increasing the user-friendliness of the CMS.
Delo v okviru EPOC III+ se je začelo aprila 2008 z namenom izboljšanja upo-
12 including the JIT Funding Project, the Contact Point for Child Protection and other matters for practitioners.
12 lih, podrobno opisane in posodobljene na naši spletni strani, ki je bila povsem prenovljena oktobra 2009.
The site is at www.eurojust.europa.eu.
Naslov spletne strani je www.eurojust.europa.eu.
Public access to Eurojust documents investigations and prosecution in which Eurojust assists fulfillment of the applicable rules on professional secrecy” (per article 4(1)(a), 6th and 7th indents of the Decision).
utemeljitvijo, da bi “razkritje ogrozilo varovanje javnih interesov v zvezi z nacionalnimi preiskavami in kazenskimi pregoni, pri katerih sodeluje Eurojust, [ter] upoštevanje veljavnih pravil o poklicni molčečnosti” (v skladu s členom 4(1)(a), šesta in sedma alineja Sklepa).
As regards the documents originating from the Member States in the same request, the grounds were refusal of disclosure from the national authorities involved as provided in article 4(4) of the Decision.
Utemelji-tev v zvezi z dokumenti iz držav članic v istem zaprosilu je bila zavrnitev razkritja s strani vpletenih nacionalnih organov v skladu z določili člena 4(4) Sklepa.
software also provides for access with different security levels.
Nova programska oprema zagotavlja tudi dostop na različnih varnostnih ravneh.
While the most sensitive information stored in the CMS is only accessible from dedicated isolated terminals within Eurojust, authorised users may access less sensitive data from their standard desktop computer.
Medtem ko so najobčutljivejše informacije v CMS-u dosegljive le s posebnih ločenih terminalov v Eurojustu, imajo pooblaščeni uporabniki dostop do varnostno manj občutljivih podatkov s svojih običajnih namiznih računalnikov.
These improvements should facilitate an increase in the quality and quantity of data entered into the system.
Pričakujemo, da bodo te posodobitve izboljšale kakovost podatkov in omogočile vnos večjega obsega podatkov v sistem.
In addition, EPOC III+ introduces some technical modifications and revised software architecture.
Poleg tega uvaja projekt EPOC III+ nekatere tehnične spremembe in izboljšave programske arhitekture.
These modifications provide a sound basis for the implementation of future changes arising from the new Eurojust Decision.
Te spremembe predstavljajo dobro podlago za implementacijo nadaljnjih sprememb, opredeljenih v novem Sklepu o Eurojustu.
The EPOC III+ system was installed at Eurojust during summer 2009.
Sistem EPOC III+ je bil nameščen v Eurojustu poleti 2009.
In accordance with the College Decision on Rules Regarding Public Access to Eurojust Documents, “any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, has a right of access to documents of Eurojust”.
V skladu s Sklepom kolegija o sprejetju pravil v zvezi z javnim dostopom do Eurojustovih dokumentov “ima katerikoli državljan Unije in katerakoli fizična ali pravna oseba z bivališčem ali sedežem v katerikoli državi članici pravico dostopa do Eurojustovih dokumentov”.
In addition, “Eurojust shall include in its annual report the number of cases in which it refused to grant access to documents”.
Poleg tega “bo Eurojust v svoja letna poročila vključil število primerov, v katerih je zavrnil dostop do svojih dokumentov”.
As part of the new approach of the Annual Report 2009, information formerly found in our annual reports can now be found detailed and updated on our website, which was completely revised in October 2009.
Kot del novega pristopa pri pripravi Letnega poročila 2009 so informacije, ki so bile prej navedene v naših letnih poroči-
In 2009, Eurojust refused to grant access to Eurojust documents on one occasion.
Leta 2009 je Eurojust v enem primeru zavrnil dostop do svojih dokumentov z
Eurojust’s Heads of Units and Services.
Vodje Eurojustovih oddelkov in služb.
Introduction information on obstacles, problems, best practice, and solutions found in judicial co-operation.
Uvod prosile za pomoč. Statistični podatki s podrobnejšimi informacijami o naraščanju števila obravnavanih primerov in vpletenih držav so na voljo v grafičnih prikazih 1, 5 in 6 v prilogi.
Co-ordination, strategic, and tactical meetings held in 2009 provided a platform for the exchange of best practice in judicial co-operation.
koordinacije in sodelovanja ter v okviru primerov predloženih Eurojustu in njegove vloge pri omogočanju boja proti težjim oblikam kriminala.
Specific examples are described in the individual sections below.
Vključene so tudi informacije o ovirah, težavah, najboljši praksi in rešitvah, ugotovljenih v pravosodnem sodelovanju.
The statistics in figures 24 of the annex provide information about casework in line with the objectives and priorities for Eurojust’s activities laid down by the Council.
Koordinacijska, strateška in taktična srečanja, organizirana v letu 2009, so zagotovila izhodišče za izmenjavo najboljše prakse v pravosodnem sodelovanju.
Additionally, about 66 per cent of Eurojust’s coordination meetings involved three or more countries, as did about 20 per cent of the overall caseload.
Kon-kretni primeri so opisani v posameznih poglavjih v nadaljevanju besedila.
Eurojust’s operational priorities for 2009 were adopted in light of the Council’s conclusions on the OCTA, the ROCTA, the TE-SAT Report, and the EU strategy for the development of an area of freedom, security and justice.
Prednostne naloge Eurojusta pri obravnavi primerov v letu 2009 so bile sprejete v luči sklepov Sveta o Oceni ogroženosti zaradi organiziranega kriminala (OCTA), Oceni ogroženosti zaradi ruskega organiziranega kriminala (ROCTA), Poročilu TE-SAT in strategiji EU za razvoj področja svobode, varnosti in pravice.
Accordingly, Eurojust in 2009 focused on the fight against terrorism, drug trafficking, trafficking in human beings, fraud, corruption, cybercrime, money laundering, and other activities related to the presence of organised crime groups in the economy.
Zato se je Eurojust v letu 2009 še posebej osredotočal na boj proti terorizmu, nedovoljeni trgovini z mamili, trgovini z ljudmi, goljufijam, korupciji, spletnemu kriminalu, pranju denarja in drugim kaznivim dejanjem, povezanim z dejavnostjo organiziranih kriminalnih združb v gospodarstvu.
Evaluation of casework, general trends and issues
Ocena obravnave primerov, splošne usmeritve in vprašanja
Only a minority of the cases concern other types of offences where Eurojust has assisted at the request of a competent authority of a Member State (article 4(2) of the Eurojust
V letu 2009 je Eurojust obravnaval 1372 novih primerov, ko so države članice za-
In 2009, Eurojust registered 1,372 new cases where Member States sought its assistance.
V tem letnem poročilu je uporabljen nov način razvrščanja primerov predloženih Eurojustu.
Statistics with more detailed information about the growth in casework and the countries involved are provided in figures 1, 5 and 6 of the annex.
V grafičnih prikazih 24 v prilogi so prikazani statistični podatki o obravnavanih primerih v skladu s cilji in prednostnimi nalogami Eurojustovih dejavnosti, ki jih je opredelil Svet.
Each priority crime area is considered below from the perspective of judicial coordination and co-operation, and within the context of cases referred to Eurojust and its role in facilitating the fight against serious crime.
Več kot 90 odstotkov primerov predloženih Eurojustu se nanaša na tiste vrste kaznivih dejanj, za katere je pristojen tudi Europol (člen 4(1) Sklepa o Eurojustu).
Included is
Samo v
15 settle under traditional MlA procedures were rapidly resolved during coordination meetings.
15 manjšem številu primerov gre za druge vrste kaznivih dejanj, ko je Eurojust sodeloval na zaprosilo pristojnega organa države članice (člen 4(2) Sklepa o Eurojustu).
Decision).
roma 24 koordinacijskih srečanj.
It should be noted that such cases can also be of a particularly serious nature, such as genocide, but which fall outside the competence of Europol (see figure 2).
Udeleženci koordinacijskih srečanj so hitro rešili zadeve, ki bi se ob izvajanju tradicionalnih postopkov medsebojne pravne pomoči morda izvrševale več mesecev.
Of the cases referred to Eurojust under article 4(1), almost two-thirds of the crime types involved were within the identified priority crime areas (see figures 3 and 4 of the annex).
Skoraj dve tretjini različnih vrst kaznivih dejanj v primerih predloženih Eurojustu v skladu s členom 4(1) se nanašata na tista področja kaznivih dejanj, ki so bila opredeljena kot prednostna (glej grafična prikaza 3 in 4 v prilogi).
investigations and for planning joint actions.
preiskovalce iz držav članic pri obravnavi čezmejnih primerov.
These meetings allow competent national authorities and Eurojust national Members, including representatives from relevant EU partners such as Europol and OlAF, where appropriate, to agree a common strategy between Member States, to plan and co-ordinate simultaneous investigations and actions (such as arrests, searches, and seizure of property), to anticipate and resolve legal difficulties, and to facilitate the execution of subsequent MlA requests.
Ta srečanja omogočajo pristojnim nacionalnim organom in nacionalnim predstavnikom v Eurojustu, vključno s predstavniki pristojnih partnerjev EU, kot sta Europol in OLAF, da po potrebi določijo skupno strategijo v državah članicah, načrtujejo in koordinirajo sočasne preiskave in ukrepe (kot so aretacije, preiskave in zasegi premoženja), predvidijo in razrešujejo pravne ovire ter omogočijo izvršitev zaprosil za medsebojno pravno pomoč.
In 2009, 118 of the 131 coordination meetings involved crime types in the priority areas.
Leta 2009 so udeleženci 118 od 131 koordinacijskih srečanj obravnavali kazniva dejanja na prednostnih področjih.
Eight coordination meetings concerned cases involving other offences at the request of the competent authorities of a Member State (article 4(2)).
Eurojust je na zaprosilo pristojnih organov države članice organiziral osem koordinacijskih srečanj zaradi obravnave primerov v zvezi z drugimi kaznivimi dejanji (člen 4(2)).
Coordination meetings continue to be a very useful tool for Member States’ judges, prosecutors and investigators in cross-border cases.
Koordinacijska srečanja so bila še naprej zelo koristno orodje za sodnike, tožilce in
In 2009, coordination meetings were the most common vehicle for the exchange of information on linked
Grafični prikazi 7-9 v prilogi vsebujejo statistične podatke o koordinacijskih srečanjih v letu 2009.
In the last three months of 2009, following a pilot project in 2008, the national Desks carried out a detailed evaluation of all closed cases.
Zadnje tri mesece leta 2009 so po uvedbi pilotskega projekta v letu 2008 nacionalna predstavništva izvedla podrobno ocenjevanje vseh zaključenih primerov.
Of the 255 cases that were evaluated, the majority dealt with EAWs and requests for judicial cooperation in respect of suspects, witnesses and/or victims.
Večina 255 ocenjenih primerov se nanaša na ENPP-je in zaprosila za pravosodno sodelovanje v zvezi z osumljenci, pričami in/ali žrtvami.
There were also requests for other forms of evidence (obtaining objects, documents, or data) and information on legal or practical issues.
Izdana so bila tudi zaprosila za druge oblike dokaznega gradiva (pridobitev predmetov, dokumentov ali podatkov) ter informacije o pravnih ali praktičnih vprašanjih.
The legal instruments most often used in judicial cooperation were the 1959 and 2000 Mutual legal Assistance Conventions, and the Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the EAW and the surrender procedures between Member States.
Konvenciji o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah iz leta 1959 in leta 2000 ter Okvirni sklep Sveta o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in predajo ter postopkih izročitve med državami članicami z dne 13. junija 2002 so bila naj-
16 incomplete information included in MlA requests.
16 pomoč, ali – kot posledica pomanjkljivih virov – “neprednostna obravnava” zaprosil za medsebojno pravno pomoč, prejetih od drugih držav članic v korist “lastnih” nacionalnih postopkov; nepotrditev prejema zaprosil za medsebojno pravno pomoč; težave zaradi slabe kakovosti prevodov; nepopolne informacije v zaprosilih za medsebojno pravno pomoč.
Eurojust is sometimes asked to intervene when these practical obstacles have not been resolved by use of the EJn.
Eurojust včasih prejme zaprosilo za posredovanje, če te praktične ovire niso bile odpravljene s posredovanjem EJN.
witness protection available (e.g. in cases involving organised crime or THB), and fair trial requirements in evidentiary matters (e.g. witness statements being admissible only when taken before a judge, but not when taken by the police).
Pravne ovire so nedvomno povezane z razlikami pri kazenskih postopkih in dokaznem gradivu, na primer, različna zakonodaja glede prisluškovanja telefonskim pogovorom, zasliševanja prič, razpoložljive stopnje zaščite prič (na primer v zadevah organiziranega kriminala ali trgovine z ljudmi) in zahtev po poštenem sojenju med dokaznim postopkom (na primer sprejemljivost izjav prič le v primeru, ko so bile podane pred sodnikom in ne predstavnikom policije).
as letters rogatory, warrants, and orders.
pogosteje uporabljena pravna sredstva v pravosodnem sodelovanju.
Where legal problems were identified, Eurojust’s services were used to obtain information on national legal provisions and on how legal difficulties could be overcome.
Eurojust je obravnaval številna zaprosila za pomoč v zvezi z omogočanjem izvršitve pravnih postopkov ali dokumentov, kot so zaprosila za mednarodno pravno pomoč, nalogi in odločbe.
Eurojust time and again assisted in the identification of competent authorities in the Member States, a task normally to be resolved by the use of the EJn tools or contact points.
Eurojust je večkrat pomagal pri določanju pristojnih organov v državah članicah, kar je naloga, ki jo običajno rešuje z uporabo orodij EJN-a ali preko kontaktnih oseb.
When examining some principal judicial cooperation instruments (letters rogatory/MlA, transfer of proceedings, recognition of decisions/judgements, and extraditions/EAW), Eurojust noted the following specific legal difficulties in operational cases:
Pri pregledovanju nekaterih temeljnih instrumentov pravosodnega sodelovanja (zaprosila za medsebojno pravno pomoč, prenos kazenskega postopka, priznavanje odločb/sodb ter izročitve/ENPP) je Eurojust ugotovil naslednje konkretne pravne ovire pri operativnih primerih:
From the 2009 evaluation, a general observation can be made regarding obstacles to judicial cooperation in the execution of MlA: practical and legal obstacles are interlinked and seem to occur with equal frequency.
Na podlagi ocene iz leta 2009 je mogoča splošna ugotovitev o ovirah pri pravosodnem sodelovanju (MLA) v zvezi z izvrševanjem medsebojne pravne pomoči: praktične in pravne ovire so medsebojno povezane in zdi se, da se pojavljajo enako pogosto.
For instance, a procedural measure (such as formal questioning of a suspect) may be essential to prosecution in one Member State but not another.
Praktične ovire so naslednje: pomanjkljivi viri na nacionalni ravni za pravočasno izvrševanje zaprosil za medsebojno pravno
• the potential inadmissibility of evidence obtained by letter rogatory when the standards or legal requirements for evidence-gathering in the issuing State are different from those in the requested State;
• možna nedopustnost dokaznega gradiva, pridobljenega na temelju zaprosila za medsebojno pravno pomoč, ko se standardi ali pravne zahteve za zbiranje dokaznega gradiva v državi izdaja-
• despite provisions in the 2000 MLA Convention, failure by the executing Member State to meet the formalities and procedures requested by an issuing Member State; legal obstacles are clearly related to differences in criminal procedure and evidence.
Na primer postopkovni ukrep (kot je uradno zaslišanje osumljenca) je lahko bistvenega pomena za tožilstvo v eni državi članici, ne pa tudi v drugi.
Examples can be found in different legislation regarding interception of communications, the hearing of witnesses, the degree of
Praktična posledica teh različnih dojemanj je, da lahko pristojni organi določijo izvršitev zaprosila kot neprednostno nalogo.