natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This includes criteria for assessing good chemical status, criteria for the identification of pollution trends and the definition of starting points for trend reversal and complementary elements of the programmes of measures (prevention and limitation of pollutant inputs into groundwater).
Vključuje tudi kriterije za oceno dobrega kemijskega stanja, kriterije za identifikacijo trendov, določitev začetne točke za obrat trenda ter komplementarne elemente programov ukrepov (preprečevanje in omejevanje vnosa onesnaževal v podzemno vodo).
All of these elements are linked to the development and implementation of River Basin Management plans whose aim is to achieve “good environmental status” by 2015.
Vsi ti elementi so povezani z razvojem in izvajanjem načrtov upravljanja voda, katerih cilj je doseči »dobro okoljsko stanje« do leta 2015.
The White Paper on European Governance stresses that regulatory proposals should be considered on the basis of an effective analysis of whether it is appropriate to intervene at EU level and whether regulatory intervention is needed.
Bela knjiga o evropskem upravljanju poudarja, da je treba zakonodajne predloge obravnavati na podlagi učinkovite analize primernosti poseganja na ravni EU in oceniti, ali je predpis zares potreben.
This analysis should also assess the potential economic, social and environmental impact of the proposal, as well as the costs and benefits of the chosen approach.
Analiza mora oceniti ekonomski, socialni in okoljski vpliv predpisa kakor tudi analizo stroškov in koristi izbranega pristopa. V tej zvezi je Komisija razvila novo celovito
In this context, a new integrated impact assessment method has been developed by
17 metodo presoje vplivov, ki je opisana v Sporočilu o presoji vplivov
the Commission as set out in a Communication17 on Impact Assessment.
možnosti za uresničevanje ciljev in analizira njihove verjetne posledice.
It outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each option and the synergies and trade-offs.
Oriše prednosti in pomanjkljivosti vsake možnosti, sinergije in kompromise.
It should be considered as an aid to political decision-making and not a substitute for it.
Obravnavati jo je potrebno kot pomoč pri političnem odločanju in ne kot nadomestek zanj.
A two-stage impact assessment was been carried out for the Commission’s proposal for a directive to protect groundwater against pollution.
K predlogu Komisije za direktivo o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaževanjem je bila opravljena dvostopenjska presoja vplivov.
The two stages were:
Ti dve stopnji sta bili:
A short preliminary assessment, carried out in January 2003 that identified the main objectives of the proposal and the key issues to be considered as part of an extended impact assessment, and
Kratka predhodna presoja, opravljena januarja 2003, ki je opredelila glavne cilje predloga in ključna vprašanja, ki jih je treba obravnavati kot del razširjene presoje vplivov, in
An extended assessment developed through consultation of other Commission departments, Member States and stakeholders during the period January-April 2003.
Razširjena presoja, pripravljena na podlagi posvetovanj z drugimi oddelki Komisije, državami članicami in zainteresiranimi stranmi v obdobju januar – april 2003.
The impact assessment examines the main features of the proposed Groundwater Directive.
Presoja vplivov je proučila glavne značilnosti predlagane direktive o podzemnih vodah.
In particular, it assesses the options for evaluating the chemical status of bodies of groundwater and for identifying and reversing significant upward trends in the concentrations of pollutants.
Ocenila je opcije za oceno kemijskega stanja teles podzemne vode ter identifikacijo in obrat pomembnih naraščajočih trendov v koncentracijah onesnaževal.
It also assesses measures to prevent and control groundwater from point and diffuse sources of pollution.
Presodila je tudi ukrepe za preprečevanje in nadziranje onesnaževanja podzemne vode iz točkovnih in razpršenih virov onesnaženja.
This extended impact assessment addressed only the economic, social and environmental aspects of the proposal and assumed that related Directives (see § 2.2.2) are, or will be, fully implemented.
Razširjena presoja vplivov je obravnavala ekonomske, socialne in okoljske vidike predloga, pri čemer je predpostavila, da so ali bodo s podzemno vodo povezane direktive (glej poglavje 2.2.2) v celoti izvajane.
It describes various options including the choices which have either been made or which are being considered.
Opisala je različne možnosti, vključno z odločitvami, ki so že bile sprejete ali se proučujejo.
It also considers the costs and benefits of each option.
Obravnavala je tudi stroške in koristi vsake možnosti.
EU Member States, Norway and the European Commission have jointly developed a common strategy for supporting the implementation of the Water Framework Directive.
Države članice EU, Norveška in Evropska komisija so razvile skupno strategijo za podporo pri izvajanju Vodne direktive, ki določa okvir za ukrepanje EU na področju vodne politike (v nadaljevanju skupna strategija za izvajanje (SSI) Vodne direk- tive18).
This directive establishes a framework for EU action in the field of water policy (hereafter referred to as the Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) for the Water Framework Directive18).
Glavni cilj te strategije je zagotoviti medsebojno povezano in usklajeno izvajanje direktive s pomočjo pojasnjevanja metodoloških vprašanj, ki omogoča doseganje skupnega razumevanja tehničnih in znanstvenih posledic Vodne direktive.
The main aim of this strategy is to ensure the coherent and harmonious implementation of the directive through the clarification of a number of methodological questions enabling a common understanding to be reached on the technical and scientific implications of the Water Framework Directive.
Na tej podlagi delujejo pod vodstvom skupine za strateško usklajevanje (SSU) delovne skupine ali ad hoc strokovne skupine, sestavljene iz držav članic in predstavnikov organizacij interesnih skupin.
In this framework, working groups or ad hoc expert groups carry out activities under the umbrella of a Strategic Coordination Group (SCG) composed of Member States and representatives of stakeholder organisations under the supervision of the Commission and EU Water Directors (Figure 6).
Delo nadzira Komisija in vodni direktorji EU (slika 6).
Water Directors
Vodni direktorji
Strategic Steering Group“WFD and Hydromorphology“Chair: DE, UK and Commission
Strateška usmerjevalna skupina“VD in hidromorfologija”Predseduje: DE, UK in Komisija
Stakeholder Forum“Water Scarcity and Droughts”Chair: Commission Co-Chair: FR/ES/IT
Forum deležnikov“Pomanjkanje vode in suše”Predseduje: Komisija skupaj s FR/ES/IT
Steering of implementation process Chair: Presidency, Co -chair, Commission
Vodenje procesa izvajanja Predseduje: Predsedstvo skupaj s Komisijo
Strategic Steering Group“WFD and Agriculture“Chair: FR, UK and Commission
Strateška usmerjevalna skupina “VD in kmetijstvo”Predseduje: FR, UK in Komisija
Strategic Coordination Group Coordination of work programme Chair: Commission
Strateška koordinacij. skupina Koordinacija delovnega programa Predseduje: Komisija
Drafting Group“Objectives/Exemptions/Economics“Chair: Commission and DK
Skupina za načrtovanje “Cilji/Izjeme/Ekonomija”Predseduje: Komisija in DK
Working Group D “Reporting”Chair: Commission, EEA and FR
Delovna skupina D “Poročanje”Predseduje: Komisija, EEA in FR
Working Group A“Ecological Status“Chair: JRC, DE and UK
Delovna skupina A“Ekološko stanje”Predseduje: JRC, DE in UK
Working Group F“Floods“Chair: Commission
Delovna skupina F“Poplave”Predseduje: Komisija
“GIS” Expert Network
“GIS” Strokovna mreža
Working Group C “Groundwater”Chair: Commission and AT
Delovna skupina C “Podzemna voda”Predseduje: Komisija in AT
Working Group E “Priority Substances”Chair: Commission
Delovna skupina E “Prednostne snovi”Predseduje: Komisija
Stakeholders, NGO’s, Researchers, Experts, etc.
Interesne skupine, nevladne organizacije, raziskovalci, strokovnjaki, itd.
EU Groundwater Working Group (WG C)
EU Delovna skupina za podzemno vodo (DS C)
STRATEGIC CO -ORDINATION GROUP
STRATEŠKA KOORDINACIJSKA SKUPINA
PLENARY WG CCHAIR: COMCO-CHAIR: AT
PLENARNA DS CPREDSEDUJE: KOMISIJA SKUPAJ Z AT
WFD & Agriculture Steering group Stakeholder Forum Water scarcity & droughts Risk Assessment Lead: AT, WATCH, NICOLE
VD & kmetijstvousmerjevalna skupina Forum deležnikov Pomanjkanje vode & Suše Ocena tveganja Vodijo: AT, WATCH, NICOLE
Land Use & Groundwater Lead: COM Compliance & Trends Lead (TV): FR, NLLead (ST guid): AT, UK 22
Raba zemlje & podzemna voda Vodi: Komisija Skladnost & trendi Vodita (VP): FR, NLVodita (ST navodila): AT, UK 22
Within this framework a technical Working Group on Groundwater was established.
V tem okviru je bila ustanovljena tudi delovna skupina za podzemno vodo.
Its original mission was to help the European Commission in the development phase of the Groundwater Directive proposal, which took place in 2002-2004.
Njeno prvotno poslanstvo je bilo pomoč Evropski komisiji v razvojni fazi priprave osnutka direktive za podzemne vode, ki je potekalo v letih 2002 – 2004.
The aim of the group then evolved in exchange of information and experiences on groundwater issues as they related to the WFD (e.g. characterisation, risk assessment, monitoring, chemical status and trends, programmes of measures).
Cilj skupine je nato prerasel v izmenjavo informacij in izkušenj o podzemni vodi, povezanih z Vodno direktivo (npr. določitev značilnosti, ocena tveganj, monitoring, kemijsko stanje in trendi, programi ukrepov).
The members of the working group share information and experiences via different means such as workshops, technical reports and guidance documents which gather participants’ experiences.
Člani delovne skupine izmenjujejo informacije in izkušnje na različne načine, kot so delavnice, tehnična poročila in pisna navodila, ki zbirajo izkušnje držav članic.
The second phase of the working group (20042006) was successful and resulted in the publication of three technical reports (see below).
Drugo obdobje delovne skupine (2004 – 2006) je bilo uspešno, rezultat njenega dela je objava treh tehničnih poročil (glej spodaj).
The Working Group on Groundwater is now entering its third period (2007-2009).
Delovna skupina za podzemno vodo začenja tretje obdobje (2007 – 2009).
The aim is to focus on implementing the new Groundwater Directive and the groundwater elements of the WFD, in particular monitoring and the preparation of the first River Basin Management Plan.
Cilj je osredotočenje na izvajanje nove direktive o podzemni vodi in izvajanje elementov Vodne direktive, ki se nanašajo na podzemne vode, zlasti monitoring in priprava prvega načrta upravljanja voda.
The political negotiation
Politična pogajanja
Following the Commission’s proposal opinion papers were issued by the Committee of the Regions in December 2003 and by the European Economic and Social Committee and Committee of the Regions in March 2004.
K predlogu Komisije je decembra 2003 podal svoje mnenje Odbor regij, marca 2004 pa Ekonomsko-socialni odbor in Odbor regij.
Owing to European Parliament (EP) elections, the first reading could not be completed in 2004 and the debate started again under the new EP (20042009) with a new Rapporteur, Mrs. Krista Klass, who managed to have the first reading adopted in April 2005.
Zaradi volitev v Evropski parlament, prvega branja ni bilo mogoče dokončati v letu 2004 in se je razprava ponovno začela v novi sestavi Evropskega parlamenta (2004 – 2009). Novi poročevalki Kristi Klass je uspelo, da je bilo prvo branje predloga direktive v EP zaključeno aprila 2005.
A political agreement was then reached at Council in June 2005, followed up by the adoption of a common position by qualified majority in January 2006.
Zatem je bil junija 2005 dosežen politični dogovor v Svetu, ki mu je v januarju 2006 sledilo sprejetje skupnega stališča s kvalificirano večino.
The second reading was adopted by the European Parliament in June 2006.
Drugo branje direktive je bilo v Evropskem parlamentu junija 2006.
The Council response to the second reading was adopted in September 2006, opening the way to conciliation negotiations as some amendments could not be accepted by Council (for more details on the political discussions, see the Commission’s communication and opinion on the europa website).
Odgovor Sveta na drugo branje EP je bil sprejet septembra 2006, kar je odprlo pot za spravna pogajanja, kajti Svet nekaterih sprememb ni mogel sprejeti (za več podrobnosti o političnih razpravah glej Sporočilo Komisije in mnenje na spletni strani18).
Following long negotiation between the European Parliament and the Council, an agreement was reached in conciliation in October 2006.
Po dolgih pogajanjih med Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom je bil v oktobru 2006 v spravnem postopku dosežen sporazum.
Key issues in the negotiations concerned the question of ‘no deterioration of groundwater quality’ and the relationship with EU legislation on water pollution by nitrates.
Ključni vprašanji pri pogajanjih sta se nanašali na poslabšanje kakovosti podzemne vode in na razmerje do EU zakonodaje glede onesnaževanja podzemne vode z nitrati.
The conciliation enabled a compromise to be reached which establishes clear requirements to prevent any deterioration of groundwater status and sets a nitrates standard of 50 mg/l as one of the criteria for good chemical status to be achieved by 2015.
Sprava je omogočila doseganje kompromisa, ki uvaja jasne zahteve za preprečevanje kakršnegakoli poslabšanja stanja podzemne vode in določa standard za vsebnost nitratov 50 mg/l kot eno od meril za dobro kemijsko stanje, ki naj bi bilo doseženo do leta 2015.
It also keeps the Nitrates Directive unchanged.
Pri tem ne spreminja Nitratne direktive.
The new directive was formally adopted in December 2006.
Nova direktiva o podzemni vodi je bila sprejeta decembra 2006.
It complements the Water Framework Directive by clearly establishing environmental objectives for groundwater chemical status and ensures continuity with the original 1980 Groundwater Directive on the protection of groundwater against pollution caused by dangerous substances until it is repealed under the WFD by the end of 2013.
1980 o varstvu podzemne vode pred onesnaženjem z nevarnimi snovmi, ki bo z Vodno direktivo konec leta 2013 razveljavljena.
Building blocks of the directive
Najpomembnejši deli direktive
The new Groundwater Directive (GWD) establishes a regime which sets underground water quality standards and introduces measures to prevent or limit inputs of pollutants into groundwater.
Nova Direktiva o podzemnih vodah4 (DPV) vzpostavlja ureditev, ki določa standarde kakovosti za podzemno vodo in uvaja ukrepe za preprečevanje ali omejevanje vnosa onesnaževal vanjo.
The directive establishes quality criteria that take into account local characteristics and allows for further improvements to be made based on monitoring data and new scientific knowledge.
Določa merila kakovosti, ki upoštevajo lokalne značilnosti in omogoča izvedbo nadaljnjih izboljšav na podlagi podatkov monitoringa in novih znanstvenih spoznanj.
The directive thus represents a proportionate and scientifically sound response to the requirements of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) as it relates to assessments on chemical status of groundwater and the identification and reversal of significant and sustained upward trends in pollutant concentrations.
Direktiva tako predstavlja skladen in znanstveno osnovan odgovor na zahteve Vodne direktive glede ocene kemijskega stanja podzemne vode ter identifikacije in obrata pomembnih in stalno naraščajočih trendov.
Member States will have to establish the standards (threshold values) at the most appropriate level and take into account local or regional conditions.
Države članice bodo morale določiti standarde kakovosti (vrednosti praga) na najprimernejši ravni in upoštevati lokalne ali regionalne razmere.
Complementing the WFD, the Groundwater Directive requires that:
S tem, ko dopolnjuje Vodno direktivo, Direktiva o podzemnih vodah zahteva, da:
■ groundwater threshold values (quality standards) be established by Member States by the end of 2008;
■ države članice do konca leta 2008 določijo vrednosti praga (standarde kakovosti) za podzemno vodo;
■ pollution trend studies be carried out using existing data and monitoring data which are mandatory under the WFD (referred to as “baseline level” data obtained in 2007-2008);
■ se ob uporabi obstoječih podatkov in podatkov monitoringa, ki ga predpisuje Vodna direktiva (navedeni kot podatki na osnovni ravni, dobljeni v obdobju 2007 – 2008) opravijo študije o trendih onesnaževanja;
■ pollution trends be reversed so that environmental objectives are achieved by 2015 using the measures set out in the WFD;
■ se trendi onesnaževanja obrnejo, tako da se z izvajanjem ukrepov, določenih v Vodni direktivi, do leta 2015 dosežejo okoljski cilji;
■ measures to prevent or limit inputs of pollutants into groundwater be operational so that WFD environmental objectives can be achieved by 2015;
■ se začnejo izvajati ukrepi za preprečevanje ali omejevanje vnosa onesnaževal v podzemno vodo, tako da se okoljski cilji Vodne direktive lahko dosežejo do leta 2015;
■ reviews of the technical provisions of the directive be carried out in 2013 and every six years thereafter;
■ se v letu 2013 in zatem vsakih šest let izvedejo pregledi tehničnih določb direktive ;
■ compliance with good chemical status criteria (based on EU standards of nitrates and pesticides and on threshold values established by Member States) be achieved by the end of 2015.
■ se izpolnjevanje meril o dobrem kemijskem stanju (na podlagi standardov EU za nitrate in pesticide in vrednosti praga, ki jih določijo države članice) doseže do konca leta 2015.
Good chemical status
Dobro kemijsko stanje
The definition of good chemical status is given in the WFD.
Dobro kemijsko stanje je opredeljeno v Vodni direktivi.
In this context, the compliance regime is based on quality objectives (compliance to relevant standards, no saline intrusion) that have to be achieved by the end of 2015.
Merila temeljijo na izpolnjevanju ciljev kakovosti (upoštevanje ustreznih standardov, nikakršnega vdora slane vode), ki morajo biti doseženi do konca leta 2015.
The establishment of good chemical status criteria was one of the elements of the mandate of Article 17 of the WFD which had to be set in the new Groundwater Directive.
Vzpostavitev meril dobrega kemijskega stanja, ki jih je bilo treba določiti v novi direktivi o podzemni vodi, je bila ena od nalog 17. člena Vodne direktive.
The direction chosen is based on compliance with EU-wide groundwater quality standards (nitrates and pesticides) which reinforce the parent directives.
Izbrana usmeritev temelji na upoštevanju standardov kakovosti za podzemno vodo na ravni EU (nitrati in pesticidi), ki krepijo ostale direktive, s katerimi se prav tako ščiti podzemna voda.
Regarding other pollutants, the adoption of numerical values at community level was not considered to be a viable option, considering the high natural variability of substances in groundwater (depending upon hydrogeological conditions, background levels, pollutant pathways, and interactions with different environmental compartments).
Glede ostalih onesnaževal je prevladalo mnenje, da sprejetje standardov kakovosti na ravni Skupnosti ni izvedljivo zaradi visoke naravne spremenljivosti snovi v podzemni vodi (ki so odvisne od hidrogeoloških pogojev, vrednosti ozadja, poti onesnaževal in interakcij z različnimi fazami porazdelitve snovi v okolju).
In addition, the management of groundwater pollution should focus on actual risks identified by the analysis of pressures and impacts under Article 5 of the WFD.
Poleg tega se je potrebno pri obvladovanju onesnaženja podzemne vode osredotočiti na dejanska tveganja, ugotovljena z analizo obremenitev in vplivov po 5. členu Vodne direktive.
Consequently, the regime of the new directive requests Member States to establish their own groundwater quality standards (referred to as “threshold values”), taking identified risks into account and the list of substances given in Annex II of the directive.
Zato ureditev po novi direktivi o podzemni vodi od držav članic zahteva, da vzpostavijo lastne standarde kakovosti podzemne vode (navedene kot vrednosti praga), ob upoštevanju ugotovljenih tveganj in seznama snovi iz priloge II direktive.
Threshold values should be established for all pollutants that characterise groundwater bodies at risk of not achieving the good chemical status objective and this should be done at the most appropriate level, e.g. national, river basin district or groundwater
Vrednosti praga je treba določiti za vsa onesnaževala, ki so značilna za vodna telesa podzemne vode, pri katerih obstaja tveganje, da ne bo dosežen cilj dobrega kemijskega stanja. To je potrebno storiti na najprimernejši ravni, npr. na državni, na ravni vodnega območja ali na ravni vodnega telesa podzemne vode.
Let us note that the list of threshold values established by Member States may be prone to regular reviews within the river basin management planning framework, which may lead to additional substances being considered (in case of new identified risks) or the deletion of substances (in case formerly identified risks no longer exist).
praga, ki ga določijo države članice, se lahko redno dopolnjuje v okviru načrtov upravljanja voda, kar lahko privede do upoštevanja dodatnih snovi (ob novo ugotovljenih tveganjih) ali do črtanja snovi s seznama (če predhodno ugotovljena tveganja ne obstajajo več).
Regarding compliance, evaluation will be based on a comparison of monitoring data with numerical standard values (EUwide groundwater quality standards and/or threshold values).
Ocena kemijskega stanja bo temeljila na primerjavi podatkov, dobljenih z monitoringom in vrednosti standardov kakovosti (evropski standardi kakovosti za podzemno vodo in/ali vrednosti praga).
In principle no groundwater body will be allowed to exceed these standard values.
Načeloma ne bo smelo nobeno telo podzemne vode presegati standardov kakovosti.
It is recognised that standard values being exceeded may be due to a local pressure (e.g. point source pollution) that does not endanger the status of the overall groundwater body concerned.
Dopustno je, da so vrednosti standardov kakovosti presežene zaradi lokalnih obremenitev (npr. onesnaženja iz točkovnih virov), ki pa ne ogroža stanja celotnega telesa podzemne vode.
Therefore, the directive opens the possibility to investigate the reasons why values are exceeded and decide on the chemical status classification on the basis of actual risks for the overall groundwater body (i.e. risks to human health, associated aquatic ecosystems or related terrestrial ecosystems, and legitimate uses and functions of groundwater).
Direktiva torej dopušča možnost, da se raziščejo razlogi za presežene vrednosti, in se kemijsko stanje določi na podlagi dejanskih tveganj za celotno telo podzemne vode (tj. tveganje za človekovo zdravje, pripadajoče vodne ali kopenske ekosisteme ter tveganje za dovoljene rabe in vlogo podzemne vode).
This means that situations might occur where standard values having been exceeded will correspond to local pressures needed to be controlled and possibly remedied without classifying the groundwater body with “poor status”.
To pomeni, da lahko pride do okoliščin, pri katerih bodo presežene vrednosti standardov kakovosti ustrezale lokalnim obremenitvam, ki jih je treba nadzirati in po možnosti sanirati, vodno telo podzemne vode pa ne bo razvrščeno v slabo kemijsko stanje.
Other situations will show that one or more cases of standard value overruns may represent a serious threat to a groundwater body and thus lead it to reach “poor status” classification.
V drugih okoliščinah pa je lahko eden ali več primerov preseženih vrednosti standarda kakovosti resna nevarnost za celotno telo podzemne vode, posledica česar je razvrstitev vodnega telesa v slabo stanje.
Decisions will be taken on a case-by-case basis in the WFD river basin management planning framework.
Odločitve se bodo sprejemale za vsak primer posebej v okviru priprave načrtov upravljanja voda.
Trend identification and reversal
Določitev in obrat trenda