natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Commission representatives have on a number ofoccasions emphasised that modifications to themanagement system proposed by the Member States need to be assessed in the light of Article 274of the Treaty which places responsibility for implementation of the budget on the Commission.
O konsistentnosti politik Skupnosti so se pojavila vprašanja, za katera se je Komisija obvezala, da jih bo raziskala ob pripravi prihodnje politike.
Themajority of the delegations attending the meetingsaid that the lessons to be learned from the 2000-06period show that changes to the method of management will have to be considered for future cohesionpolicy.
Med debato je bilo pogostokrat izpostavljeno posebno vprašanje, kakšen bo status regij v okviru konkurenčne politike, ki bodo obremenjene s “om” kot rezultatom širitve.
In essence, Member States will wish to see simplification and a much greater decentralisation ofresponsibilities as regards all aspects of financialmanagement and control of European programmes
Zahteva se, da tudi v nadaljnje izpolnjujejo pogoje za ekvivalentno ravot
An avenue to be explored in the third cohesion reportis the kind of contractual approachrequiredbetween the Commission and the national authorities (and the regional authorities in the framework ofany tripartite arrangements) identifying the results tobe achieved through the use of Communityresources, while respecting the constitutional situation of the Member States.
Predstavniki Komisije so ob številnih priložnostih poudarili, da je treba spremembe sistema upravljanja, ki jih predlagajo državečlena 274 Pogodbe o EU, ki daje Komisiji odgovornost nad pr Tako bi nadaljnjo decentralizacijo morala spremljati tudi jasnejša opredelitev odgovornosti, ki bi zagotovila potrebna jamstva za uporabo sredstev EU.
(iii) Other aspects
87(3)(a) se namenja regijam, ki so opr Pogodbe o EU.
The Commission recommended in the second cohesion report that the debate on the future of Europeancohesion policy should focus on content rather thanon financial resources.
Kot je Komisija objavila v prvem poredku, bo potrebno tretje poronomski in socialni koheziji sprtini leta 2003, da bi lahko ustvarili pogoje za “ovito izvajanje nove generacije programov, kiu novega programskega obdobja”. To poredstavilo “konkretne predloge
Wide-ranging consultations will take place in 2003,including a major event (in March2003) in the formof a seminar on “The future management of the Structural Funds: how are responsibilities to beshared?“.
Komisija želi, da so zakonodajni instrumenti sprejeti pred koncem leta 2005.
There are also plans to arrange consultations on the proposals for the third report at the startof 2004 as part of a Forum on cohesion.
To bi pomenilo, da bi bilo leto 2006 namenjeno pogajanjem z držaegijami o programiranju za obdobje od leta 2007 do leta 2013.
The Commission will put forward its proposalson the new financial perspective in due course.
V letu 2003 bodo potekala vetovanja, vkz glavnim dogodkom (marca leta 2003), ki bo seminar
Sources: Eurostat and NSI
> =15,4 e delovne sile
Patent applications to the EPO, 1998 to 2000
> 200 vE o ena milijonpr v ehnologija - zaposlenost in pa te nt ija r
150 average group 1 average EU-25
Povprečje skupina 1 povprečje v EU s 25 članicami
Source: Eurostat, calculations DG REGIO
Vir: Eurostat, izračuni DG REGIO v k ža
GDP/head (PPS) by country and regional extremes, 2000
BDP na prebivalca po kupni moči in regionalni ekstremi v letu 2000
Source: Eurostat*In these regions, the per capita GDP figure tends to be overestimated because of commuter flows.
Vir: Eurostat*V teh regijah je BDP na prebivalca precenjen zaradi dnevne migracije
Summary statistics for regions falling below the 75% threshold (based on GDP/head in PPS, 2000)
Pregled statističnih podatkov za regije, ki ne dosegajo 75 % višine povprečnega BDP-ja v EU (osnova je BDP na prebivalca po kupni moči v letu 2000)
Number of regions falling below the 75%thereshold: of which in EU15
Število regij, ki ne dosegajo 75% praga 48 85 6799 68Od tega v EU s 15 članicami48 48 30 48 18
Population in those regions (millions)of which in EU15
Število prebivalcev v teh regijah (v milijonih) 68137 116168 122Od tega v EU s 15 članicami 68 68 47 68 24
Population as a proportion of EU15/25/27EU15 regions as a proportion of EU15 total
Število prebivalcev kot delež v EU15*/25**/27***18% 30% 26% 35% 25%Regije v EU s 15 članicami kot delež vseh v EU s 15 članicami 18% 18% 12% 18% 6%
Average GDP/head (PPS) of regions fallingbelow the thresholdof which in EU15
Povprečni BDP na prebivalca po kupni moči v regijah, ki ne dosegajo 75% praga 65 53 5447 46Od tega v EU s 15 članicami 65 65 69 65 68
Source: Eurostat, calculations DGREGIO
*EU15 - EU s 15 članicami. **EU25 - EU s 25 članicami. ***EU27 - EU s 27 članicami
Copenhagen: Distribution of Cohesion Fund and Structural Fund commitment appropriations for the10 new Member States
København: razdelitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti kohezijskega in strukturnih skladov za 10 novih držav članic
Million, 1999 prices
V milijonih evrov po deviznem tečaju iz leta 1999
Cohesion Fund Indicative allocation(as % of total)
Kohezijski sklad Fundusze Strukturalne Država Namen sredstev Cilj 1 Cilj 2 Cilj 3 FIFG* C.I.** Skupaj (v % skupnega zneska )Interrreg Equal
38,4 million is to be added to the total of 14117,5 million under technical assistance.
Vsoti 14 117,5 milijona evrov je treba dodati 38,4 milijona evrov za tehnično pomoč.* - finančni instrument za usmerjanje ribištva** - pobude Skupnosti
Working for the regions
V službi regij
European regional policy is a policy promoting solidarity.
Evropska regionalna politika je politika, ki spodbuja solidarnost.
It allocates more than a third of the budget of the European Union to the reduction of the gaps in development among the regions and disparities among the citizens in terms of well-being.
Več kot tretjina proračuna Evropske unije je namenjenega zmanjšanju razvojnih razlik med regijami in neenakosti med državljani, kar zadeva blaginjo.
The Union seeks to use the policy to help lagging regions to catch up, restructure declining industrial regions, diversify the economies of rural areas with declining agriculture and revitalise declining neighbourhoods in the cities.
Unija namreč poskuša izvajati tako politiko, ki bo zaostalim regijam pomagala pri približevanju povprečni razvitosti EU skozi prestrukturiranje industrijsko manj razvitih regij, skozi preoblikovanje podeželskih območij s propadajočim kmetijstvom in z obnovo nazadujočih četrti v mestih.
It sets job creation as its primary concern.
Prednostna naloga te politike je ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest.
In a word, it seeks to strengthen the economic, social and territorial ‘cohesion’ of the Union.
Z eno besedo, prizadeva si za okrepitev ekonomske, socialne in ozemeljske „kohezije“ v Uniji.
Specifically, regional policy helps people to find work and live better in their country, region, neighbourhood or village.
Regionalna politika naprimer pomaga ljudem pri iskanju dela, da bi bolje živeli v svoji državi, deželi, soseski ali na vasi.
It makes it possible for highways, highspeed trains and airports to bring regions on the periphery closer to the great centres of economic development.
Obrobne regije poskuša približati velikim središčem gospodarskega razvoja, in sicer z gradnjo avtocest, hitrih vlakov in letališč.
Small and medium-sized enterprises are created in backward regions.
V nerazvitih regijah spodbuja odpiranje malih in srednjih podjetij.
The environment in old industrial wastelands is improved. Information society takes root in rural areas.
Na ta način pomaga okoljem na starih in zanemarjenih industrijskih območjih, da si opomorejo.
Education and recreational services become established in the suburbs.
Informacijski družbi utira pot na podeželje in zagotavlja izobraževalne in rekreacijske storitve v primestnih okoliših.
Since 2000, regional policy has also provided considerable assistance to the economic development of countries applying for accession to the European Union.
Vse od leta 2000 je bila regionalna politika v pomoč pri gospodarskem razvoju držav, ki so zaprosile za članstvo v Evropski uniji.
On 1 May 2004, the European family welcomed 10 of them.
Evropska družina je tako 1. maja 2004 izrekla dobrodošlico desetim izmed njih.
This major event is a historic opportunity for Europe and a challenge for regional policy: in a single blow, the range of disparities within the Union was enlarged.
Ta pomemben dogodek je zgodovinska priložnost za Evropo in izziv za njeno regionalno politiko: z enim samim zamahom so se namreč neenakosti znotraj Unije še povečale.
It will be necessary both to respond to the enormous needs of the new Member States and also to the difficulties that remain in the rest of the Union.
Vendar je treba prisluhniti tako novim državam članicam, ki imajo velikanske potrebe, kot tudi težavam v drugih delih Unije.
European regional policy, therefore, is necessary now more than ever. It is neither archaic nor outdated.
Danes potrebujemo Evropsko regionalno politiko morda bolj, kot kadarkoli prej. Ni ne arhaična, ne za časom. To ni dobrodelna politika.
Instead it seeks primarily to generate new ones.
Njena naloga ni samo razdeljevanje sredstev, ampak si prizadeva predvsem za ustvarjanje novih virov.
It is not a policy ‘from above’ but rather a decentralised policy based on partnerships in which the responsibilities are divided and concrete projects are administered on site.
To ni politika v oblakih, temveč decentralizirana politika, ki temelji na partnerstvu, kjer se odgovornost porazdeli in konkretni projekti vodijo na licu mesta.
It is also a policy in which knowledge, technology and ‘good practices’ are exchanged, and cooperative networks are developed throughout Europe as a whole.
Je tudi politika, kjer se izmenjujejo znanje, tehnologija in „dobra praksa“ ter ustvarjajo mreže sodelovanja po vsej Evropi.
It is a coordinated policy that leaves room for initiatives and, better yet, encourages and strengthens them.
Ima značilnosti usklajene politike, ki pušča prostor za pobude in, kar je še bolje, jih spodbuja ter krepi.
It cannot be replaced by a simple policy of calls for tender at European level.
Evropsko regionalno politiko ne more nadomestiti poenostavljena politika razpisov.
This emerges clearly from the debate on its future, launched throughout the entire Union in 2000.
To se je pokazalo na razpravi o njeni prihodnosti, ki je potekala leta 2000 po vsej Uniji.
It will meet the challenges if it adjusts its objectives, resources and methods to meet the new tasks of the enlargement and the growing tasks emerging from economic globalisation.
Novim izzivom pa bo kos le, če bo prilagodila svoje cilje, sredstva in metode prihodnjim nalogam, ki jih prinašata širitev unije in globalizacija gospodarstva.
This is the goal of the reform proposal for the programming period that will begin on 1 January 2007 that the European Commission has just presented after three years of debate.
Prav takšen je tudi namen predloga reforme programskega obdobja, ki se bo začel 1. januarja 2007. Evropska komisija ga je po treh letih razprav predstavila pred nedavnim.
This brochure makes it possible for everyone to discover the possibilities of a policy that, more than anything else, is at the service of the regions and their citizens.
Ta brošura torej omogoča vsakomur, da odkrije priložnosti politike, ki je, bolj kot katerakoli druga v službi regij in njenih državljanov.
Working for the regions
Bruto nacionalni proizvod
CEECs: central and east European countries
Države Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope
European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund
Evropski kmetijski usmerjevalni in jamstveni sklad
Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance
Finančni instrument za usmerjanje ribištva
Instrument for Structural Policies for Preaccession
Instrument strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju
Phare: the ‘general’ financial instrument in the preaccession strategy
„Splošni“ finančni instrument v okviru predpristopne strategije
Special Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development
Raziskave in razvoj
SMEs: small and medium-sized enterprises
Posebni pristopni program za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
Some key dates
Zgodovina razvoja
The countries signing the Treaty of Rome refer in its preamble to the need ‘to strengthen the unity of their economies and to ensure their harmonious development by reducing the differences existing among the various regions and the backwardness of the less-favoured regions’.
Države so podpisale Rimsko pogodbo, ki že v uvodu napoveduje krepitev gospodarske skupnosti, kot sredstvo usklajenega razvoja in zmanjševanja razlik med regijami.
Setting-up of two sector-based funds: the European Social Fund (ESF) and the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF).
Ustanovitev dveh skladov: Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESF) in Evropskega kmetijskega usmerjevalnega in jamstvenega sklada (EAGGF).
Creation of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to redistribute part of the Member States’ budget contributions to the poorest regions.
Ustanovitev Evropskega regionalnega sklada (ERDF), ki naj bi porazdelil del evropskega proračuna med najrevnejše regije skupnosti.
The Single European Act lays the basis for a genuine cohesion policy designed to offset the burden of the single market for the southern countries and other less-favoured regions.
Enotna evropska listina (Single European Act) postavi temelje za kohezijsko politiko, ki naj bi premostila težave enotnega trga predvsem v južnih, manj razvitih državah.
The European Council in Brussels in February 1988 overhauls the operation of the Solidarity Funds (now referred to as the Structural Funds) and allocates ECU 68 billion to them (at 1997 prices).
Evropski svet v Bruslju februarja 1988 oznani začetek delovanja solidarnostnih skladov (danes jih imenujemo strukturni skladi) in zanje nameni 68 milijard ECU (cene iz leta 1997).
The Treaty of the European Union, which came into force in 1993, designates cohesion as one of the main objectives of the Union, alongside economic and monetary union and the single market.
Maastrichtska pogodba, ki je začela veljati leta 1993, določi kohezijo kot eno od prednostnih nalog Unije, poleg gospodarske in denarne unije ter enotnega trga.
It also establishes the creation of the Cohesion Fund to support projects in the fields of the environment and transport in the least prosperous Member States.
Na podlagi tega je bil ustanovljen kohezijski sklad za podporo projektom na področju okolja in prometa v najbolj zaostalih državah članicah.
The Edinburgh European Council (December 1993) allocates almost 200 billion ECU (at 1997 prices), one third of the Community budget, to cohesion policy.
Evropski svet se je v Edinburghu (decembra 1992) odločil, da bo skoraj 200 milijard evrov (cene iz leta 1997), t.j. tretjino celotnega proračuna EU, namenil za financiranje sistema strukturnih skladov.
Alongside the Structural Funds, a new Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) is created.
Obstoječim skladom pa se je pridružil še poseben finančni instrument za ribištvo (FIFG).
The Berlin European Council (March 1999) reforms the Structural Funds and adjusts the operation of the Cohesion Fund.
Evropski svet v Berlinu (marca 1999) prinese prelomnico oz. reformo strukturnih skladov in prilagoditev ukrepov v kohezijskem skladu.
These funds will receive over EUR 30 billion per year between 2000 and 2006, i.e. EUR 213 billion over seven years.
Skladi naj bi v programskem obdobju 20002006 dobili več kot 30 milijard evrov letno, kar presega 213 milijard evrov v celotnem obdobju.
The Instrument for Structural Policies for Preaccession (ISPA) and the Special Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development (Sapard) complements the Phare programme that has been in existence for seven years to promote economic and social development and environmental protection in the applicant countries in central and eastern Europe.
Programa predpristopne pomoči ISPA in SAPARD se pridružita programu PHARE, ki obstaja že od leta 1989 in je namenjen ekonomskemu in socialnemu razvoju ter varovanju okolja držav kandidatk srednje in vzhodne Evrope.
The European Council in Lisbon (March 2000) adopts a strategy focused on employment and designed to make the Union ‘the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world by the year 2010’.
Evropski svet v Lizboni (marca 2000) sprejme strategijo, ki se osredotoči na zaposlovanje in na podlagi te strategije naj bi Unija do leta 2010 postala „najbolj konkurenčno, dinamično in na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu“.
The Gothenburg Council (June 2001) completed this strategy by linking it with sustainable development.
Evropski svet v Gothenburgu (junija 2001) dopolni to strategijo s trajnostnim razvojem.
The European Council in Copenhagen (December 2002) leads to an agreement on the conditions for the accesion of 10 new Member States to the Union.
Na Evropskem svetu v Kopenhagnu (decembra 2002) sprejmejo sporazum o pogojih za sprejem desetih novih držav članic v Unijo.
On 18 February, the European Commission presents its proposals for the reform of cohesion policy for the period 2007–13: ‘A new partnership for cohesion: convergence, competitiveness, cooperation’.
Evropska komisija (18. februarja) predstavi svoje predloge za reformo kohezijske politike za obdobje 20072013: „Novo partnerstvo za kohezijo: približevanje, konkurenčnost, sodelovanje“.
On 1 May, accession to the European Union of Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia.
Evropska unija se 1. maja razširi z desetimi novimi članicami: Ciper, Češka, Estonija, Madžarska, Latvija, Litva, Malta, Poljska, Slovaška in Slovenija.
The European Union is one of the most prosperous economic zones in the world.
Evropska unija je eno najnaprednejših gospodarskih območij na svetu.
Since the accession of 10 new Member States on 1 May 2004, it has the power of an internal market and the human potential of more than 450 million citizens.
S pristopom desetih novih držav članic 1. maja 2004 je človeški potencial notranjega trga presegel 450 milijonov državljanov.
But economic and social disparities among its Member States and among its regions weaken its dynamism overall.
Gospodarske in socialne razlike med njenimi članicami in regijami pa celotno dinamiko precej slabijo.
These disparities are twice as great in the Europe of the Twenty-five, with its 254 regions, than they were in the Europe of the Fifteen.
Omenjene razlike so v Evropi s petindvajsetimi članicami in 254 regijami dvakrat večje, kot so bile v petnajsterici.
Disparities in revenue and employment have declined in the European Union as a whole during the past 10 years and in particular since the mid-1990s.
Razlike v prihodkih in zaposlenosti v Evropski uniji so se v preteklih desetih letih precej povečale, še posebej od sredine 90-ih let.
Between 1994 and 2001, in the ‘Cohesion Fund countries’ (see page 8), even if one excludes Ireland, which experienced exceptional development, the increase in the GDP per head has surpassed by 1 % per year the average of the Union, and in all these countries — with the exception of Greece — the proportion of the population of working age that holds a job has increased significantly more quickly than the average.
V letih 1994 do 2001 je v „kohezijskih državah“ (glej stran 8), tudi če izvzamemo Irsko, ki je doživela izjemen razvoj, rast BDP na prebivalca za 1 % presegla povprečno letno rast v Uniji. V vseh navedenih državah – z izjemo Grčije – je delež zaposlenega aktivnega prebivalstva rasel hitreje kot povprečje v Uniji.
With respect to employment, unemployment rates (2002 data) vary greatly within the Twenty-five: from 2 % in Tyrol (Austria) and 3.3 % in Cyprus to 29 % on Réunion Island (France) and 26.3 % in the Lubuskie region (Poland).
Stopnja brezposelnosti se v petindvajseterici (podatki iz leta 2002) precej razlikuje: od 2 % na Tirolskem (Avstrija) in 3,3 % na Cipru, do 29 % na otoku Réunion (Francija) in 26,3 % v regiji Lubuskie (Poljska).
Outside the most disadvantaged regions, many regions and cities find themselves in an intermediate situation with areas in which serious economic and social difficulties accumulate.
Izven nerazvitih regij so številne regije in mesta, ki so se znašla v „vmesnem“ položaju in na teh območjih se kopičijo gospodarski in socialni problemi.
These disparities have grown since the accession of the new Member States, however.
Te razlike so se seveda povečale s pristopom novih držav članic.
While the GDP of the Twenty-five has only grown by 5 % by comparison with that of the Fifteen, the average GDP per head in the new countries acceding to the Union is less than half of the current average in the Union and only 56 % of the population of working age holds a job, as compared to 64 % in the Union of the Fifteen.
Medtem ko se je BDP Unije s petindvajsetimi članicami povečal samo za 5 % v primerjavi s petnajsterico, je povprečni BDP na prebivalca v državah pristopnicah več kot za polovico manjši od sedanjega povprečja v Uniji in samo 56 % aktivnega prebivalstva je zaposlenih, v primerjavi s 64 % v Uniji s petnajstimi članicami.
In short, Europeans do not all have the same advantages in the face of the challenge of globalisation, depending on whether they live in a region that is prosperous or one that is lagging behind with respect to development, a dynamic or depressed area, a city or the countryside, a peripheral or isolated area, or one of the key economic centres of the Union.
Cilj 1 strukturnih skladov (gospodarski razvoj najmanj razvitih regij) vključuje celotno ozemlje novih držav članic in skoraj 98 % njihovega prebivalstva - dve tretjini živita v regijah z BDP-jem na prebivalca, ki znaša manj kot polovico povprečnega BDP Unije s petindvajsetimi
GDP per head, 2002
BDP na prebivalca, 2002
Average EU-25
Povprečje EU-25
Employment, training, the competitiveness of firms, investment in infrastructure, the information society, research, and the quality of the environment are all primarily the responsibility of authorities and economic operators in each Member State and region.
Zaposlovanje, usposabljanje, konkurenčnost podjetij, investicije v infrastrukturo, informacijska družba, raziskave in kakovost okolja so v prvi vrsti domena oblasti in gospodarstva v vsaki državi članici in regiji.
But not only …
Toda ne samo njihova…
European solidarity is in fact already mentioned in the preamble of the Treaty on European Union.
Evropska solidarnost je v resnici omenjena že v preambuli Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
The Treaty specifies that the Community acts to strengthen its economic and social cohesion and specifically to reduce the gaps among levels of development in the various regions.
Pogodba določa ukrepe Skupnosti za krepitev njene ekonomske in socialne kohezije in predvsem za zmanjšanje razlik v razvitosti med regijami.
This is why the Member States participate in a European regional policy co-financed by the European funds, Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund, which embody Community solidarity.
Zato države članice sodelujejo pri evropski regionalni politiki, ki jo sofinancirajo različni evropski skladi, kot so strukturni skladi in kohezijski sklad, ki poosebljajo solidarnost Skupnosti.
This policy plays more than just a financial role, however.
Ta politika ne igra samo finančne vloge.
Its goal is not simply to redistribute resources but rather to create new ones by investing in the potential of the regions and their communities.
Tako njena naloga ni zgolj razdeljevanje sredstev, ampak si prizadeva ustvariti nove vire, in sicer z investiranjem v potenciale regij in njenih skupnosti.
It also seeks to bring ‘added value’ to development activities, more specifically, the European dimension.
Prizadeva si tudi vpeljati „dodano vrednost“ v razvojne aktivnosti, še posebej v tiste, ki imajo evropsko dimenzijo.
In other words, to support joint consideration and action and promote a European model of regional development: this is where opportunity lies for the regions of Europe in an increasingly global world.
Z drugimi besedami, priložnost evropskih regij v vse bolj globaliziranem svetu je v spodbujanju skupnih razmišljanj in dejanj ter v promociji evropskega modela regionalnega razvoja.