natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
› terminal services for personal mobile communications,
Dodan je bil, ko se je leta 1992 spremenila Priloga I, potem ko so ga ev-ropske institucije uradno priznale za evropski organ za stan-dardizacijo.
› next-generation networks that will have universal applica-tion both geographically and in terms of their ability to de-liver information in whatever form it may exist.
Standardi, ki jih je objavil ETSI, prispevajo k temu cilju, ker za-gotavljajo zdru™ljivost novih storitev, ponudenih uporabnikom, pa tudi terminalske opreme, ki je na voljo na trgu.
for telecommunications equipment and services to be estab-lished.
› omre™ja naslednjih generacij, ki bodo v sploþni rabi, geograf-sko in na podlagi njihove sposobnosti, da dajejo informacije v kakrþni koli obliki.
It was created in response to the Green Paper published in 1987 by the Commission of the European Communities on `the development of a common market for telecommunica-tions services and equipment', with a view to accelerating the technical harmonisation which was essential to the growth of networks, industry and new technologies.
Njegova ustanovitev je bila odgovor na Zeleno knjigo, ki jo je leta 1987 objavila Komisija Evropskih skupnosti o ¶razvoju skupnega trga za telekomunikacijske storitve in opremoƒ, da se pospeþi tehniｲno usklajevanje, ki je bilo bistveno za rast omre™ij, industrije in novih tehnologij.
In spite of the histo-ry of its creation, ETSI is an independent organisation, governed by its members.
Kljub zgodovini nastan-ka je ETSI neodvisna organizacija, ki jo urejajo njeni ｲlani.
The structures and operation of ETSI di.erconsiderablyfromthose of CEN and CENELEC.
Strukture in delovanje ETSI se znatno razlikujejo od tistih pri CEN in CENELEC.
Whereas within CEN and CENELEC the work is organised largely around national delegations, ETSI is an open forum which groups together all the market inter-ests who wish to take part in its work and use its standards.
Medtem ko je delo v okviru CEN in CENELEC organizirano bolj okoli nacionalnih delegacij, je ETSI odprt fo-rum, zdru™ujoｲ vse tr™ne interese, ki ™elijo sodelovati pri delu in uporabi standardov.
National governments, national standardisation bodies, net-work operators, equipment manufacturers, users, service sup-pliers, research bodies, consultancy companies, regulators etc. can all be members of ETSI.
Plani ETSI so lahko vsi, nacionalne vlade, nacionalni organi za standardizacijo, omre™ni operaterji, izdelovalci opreme, upo-rabniki, izvajalci storitev, raziskovalni organi, svetovalna pod-jetja, regulativni organi itd.
Membership can be either on an individual company basis or through national or European bodies.
Planstvo je mogoｲe na podlagi po-sameznega podjetja ali prek nacionalnih ali evropskih organov.
Centred on advanced technologies within the ICT domain, ETSI is the product of its age, and is increasingly having to re-spond to the challenges and needs of converging sectors: tel-ecommunications, information technology, broadcasting and entertainment.
ETSI, osredotoｲen na napredne tehnologije v okviru podroｲja ICT, je proizvod svoje dobe ter se mora vedno bolj odzivati na izzive in potrebe konvergenｲnih podroｲij: telekomunikacij, in-formacijske tehnologije, radiodifuzije in razvedrila.
Throughout the world this convergence is constantly being re‹ectedinnewapplications(business-to-business communications, teleworking, access to entertain-ment, scienti«cdatabasesandgames,thedevelopmentofpreventive health care and care at home for the elderly, `intel-ligent' transportation, etc.).
Po vsem svetu se to zbli™evanje stalno ka™e v novih vlogah (medpod-jetniþke komunikacije, delo na daljavo, dostop do razvedrila, znanstvene podatkovne zbirke in igre, razvoj preventivnega zdravstvenega varstva in nega doma za starejþe, ¶inteligentniƒ prenos itd.).
Even within traditional telecom-munications, convergence of the technologies associated with «xednetworks,mobilenetworks,otherwirelesscommu-nications, satellite, banking and so on is turning the old order on its head.
Tudi v okviru tradicionalnih telekomunikacij, kon-vergence tehnologij, povezanih s «ksnimiomre™ji,mobilnimiomre™ji, drugimi brez™iｲnimi komunikacijami, sateliti, banｲni-þtvom in tako naprej se stari red postavlja na glavo.
ETSI is at the forefront of managing this change.
ETSI je na vidnem polo™aju pri ukvarjanju s to spremembo.
ETSI has three member categories: Full Members, Associate Members and Observers.
Obljubljena informacijska dru™ba prihaja zares.
The organs of ETSI comprise:
ETSI ima tri ｲlanske kategorije: polnopravni ｲlani, pridru™eni ｲlani in opazovalci.
The promised Information Society is truly arriving: Europe is participating in this revolution, and the socio-economic stakes are high.
Vsi se lahko udele™ijo zasedanja generalne skupþｲine, vendar lahko volijo samo polnopravni in pridru™eni ｲlani.
If users are to bene«tfully,interconnectionandinter-operability of operator networks is essential.
Od leta 2004 ima ETSI skoraj 700 ｲlanov.
› the Board of Directors, composed entirely of representatives of Full Members;
Odloｲba 92/400/EGS z dne 15. julija 1992, UL L 221, 6.8.1992, str. 55.
The standards published by ETSI contribute to this objective since they are aimed at ensuring the compatibility of new serv-ices o.eredtousersaswellasoftheterminalequipmentwhichis available on the market.
Preden je bila vzpostavljena standardizacija telekomunikacij na evropski ravni, so telekomunikacijski sektor skoraj izkljuｲno obravnavali nacionalni predpisi.
These standards cover three main areas:
Ker ni bilo zanesljivo, da bodo dr™ave ｲlanice sprejele priporoｲila CEPT, v tistem ｲasu ni bilo uｲinkovite uskladitve.
› the Technical Organisation, made up of Technical Committees, Projects and Working Groups, which prepare standards and reports; this, it examines the requirements contained in standardisation requests which come in particular from the `Industry High Level Strategy Group' and the European Commission, before organis-ing them into coherent standards programmes.
› generalna skupþｲina, vrhovni organ, ki ga sestavljajo vsi ｲlani in doloｲa sploþno politiko ter nadzoruje upravo institucije in njenih dejavnosti;
The division of the work between the three bodies takes place within the ICT Standards Board.
› upravni odbor, ki ga sestavljajo samo predstavniki polno-pravnih ｲlanov;
› the Secretariat (managed by a Director-General (Chief Execu-tive), assisted by a Deputy Director-General), which plays an important role in running ETSI and assists in routine admin-istration;
Da bi bilo to mogoｲe, odbor pregleda zahteve iz standardizacij-skih pobud, ki izhajajo zlasti iz ¶strateþke skupine industrije na visoki ravniƒ in Evropske komisije, preden jih vkljuｲi v skladne standardizacijske programe.
› Specialist Task Forces set up by the General Assembly for spe-ci«ctasksandforade«nedperiod.
› tehniｲna organizacija, sestavljena iz tehniｲnih odborov, pro-jektnih in delovnih skupin, ki pripravljajo standarde in poro-ｲila;
In accordance with the principle of openness governing its or-ganisation, ETSI is a party to various international agreements, notably with the ISO/IEC, the CEPT and the ITU (International Telecommunication Union).
› sekretariat (vodi ga glavni direktor (generalni izvrþni direk-tor), temu pa pomaga pomoｲnik glavnega direktorja), ki ima pomembno vlogo pri vodenju ETSI in pomaga pri rutinskem upravljanju;
The close co-operation between CEN, CENELEC and ETSI is for-malised at the highest level by a policy structure common to the three bodies: `The Joint Presidents Group' (JPG), which is re-sponsible for ensuring the most e/cientadministrationpossi-ble of the areas of overlapping competence.
Tesno sodelovanje med CEN, CENELEC in ETSI oblikuje na najviþji ravni struktura politike, ki je skupna trem organom: ¶Skupna skupi-na predsednikovƒ (JPG), ki je odgovorna za kar najuｲinkovitejþe upravljanje podroｲij, na katerih se pristojnosti prekrivajo.
The JPG, which is composed of a delegation of the administrators and secretar-ies-general of each of the European standardisation bodies, prepares for this purpose agreements relating to common problems.
JPG, ki ga sestavlja delegacija upravnega osebja in generalnih sekretarjev vsakega evropskega organa za standardizacijo, pripravi v ta namen sporazume, ki se nanaþajo na skupna vpraþanja.
Other resources come from the subscriptions of members of ETSI, contributions from the national telecommunications authorities, and a small amount from the sale of standards.
› delovne skupine za posebne naloge, ki jih doloｲi generalna skupþｲina za posebne naloge in za doloｲeno obdobje.
ETSI's primary focus for its stand-ards is Europe, naturally, but with a truly international mem-bership (even most of its European members are global play-ers), the Institute seeks to develop standards for world-wide application.
ETSI je skladno z naｲelom odprtosti, ki velja za njegovo organi-zacijo, pogodbenik pri razliｲnih mednarodnih sporazumih, predvsem z ISO/IEC, CEPT in ITU (Mednarodna telekomunikacij-ska zveza).
It was in this context that an agreement was concluded on the division of tasks for standardisation of electrical vehicles: CENELEC was given responsibility for preparing standards for vehicles connected to the electricity network, whilst CEN is re-sponsible for standards for vehicles independent of the net-work.
V tem okviru je bil sklenjen sporazum o delitvi nalog za stan-dardizacijo elektriｲnih vozil: CENELEC je bila dana odgovornost za pripravo standardov za vozila, povezana z elektriｲnim omre™-jem, medtem ko je CEN odgovoren za standarde za vozila, ne-odvisna od omre™ja.
Furthermore, the co-operation between CENELEC and ETSI is based on a set of guidelines designed to resolve the dif-«cultiesinherentintheoverlappingofresponsibilitiesandavoid duplication offfe . o r t .
Poleg tega sodelovanje med CENELEC in ETSI temelji na skupini smernic, naｲrtovani za odpravljanje te-™av, nastalih pri prekrivanju odgovornosti, in za prepreｲevanje podvajanja prizadevanj.
T h e a d op t i o n o ft h e C E N E L E C / E T S I s t a n d a r d s programme for the development of harmonised standards guaranteeing electromagnetic compatibility in the «eldoftelecommunicationsisanotherexampleofthekindofco-operation which must be extended, since the standards programmes will increasingly call for the participation of two or even three European standardisation bodies.
Sprejetje standardizacijskega progra-ma CENELEC/ETSI za razvoj harmoniziranih standardov, ki jam-ｲijo elektromagnetno zdru™ljivost na telekomunikacijskem po-droｲju, je tudi primer sodelovanja, ki se mora razþiriti, ker bodo standardizacijski programi ｲedalje bolj zahtevali sodelovanje dveh ali celo treh evropskih organov za standardizacijo.
10) `national standardisation body': a body referred to in Annex II;
Delo ETSI « n a n c i r a t a d e l n o E S i n Ef t a v o k v i r u m a n d a t n e g a d e l a z a pripravo standardov v podporo politikam Skupnosti.
Although they are precisely d e « n e d , t h e fu n c t i o n s o f C E N , C E N E L E C and ETSI inevitably overlap in a number of «elds,suchas the machinery sector or the sector of information and com-munications technology (ICT), which is situated at the cross-roads between information technology, electronic compo-nents and telecommunications networks.
Drugi viri so prispevki ｲlanov ETSI, prispevki nacionalnih telekomuni-kacijskih organov in v manjþem dele™u prodaja standardov.
Co-ordination of the work of these three bodies is therefore essential.
ETSI-jev primarni poudarek glede standardov je Evropa, seve-da, vendar si inþtitut z resniｲnim mednarodnim ｲlanstvom (celo veｲina evropskih ｲlanov je globalnih igralcev) prizadeva razviti standarde za uporabo po vsem svetu.
This is mainly done through the ICT Standards Board, which is open to economic operators.
(10) ¶nacionalni standardizacijski organƒ je organ, naveden v Pri-logi II;
It was set up in 1995 to coordi-nate the work and identify market requirements. In order to do
Kljub jasni opredelitvi se funkcije CEN, CENELEC in ETSI neizo-gibno prekrivajo na þtevilnih podroｲjih, kakrþno je strojno po-droｲje ali podroｲje informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije (ICT), ki je na stiｲiþｲu med informacijsko tehnologijo, elektron-
The national standardisation bodies referred to in Annex II to the Directive are the institutions in the various Member States which are responsible for preparing and publishing standards, in accordance with a procedure which allows all economic and
Nacionalni organi za standardizacijo, navedeni v Prilogi II k Di-rektivi, so institucije v raznih dr™avah ｲlanicah, odgovorne za
social operators concerned to take part in the work on a volun-tary basis. Their tasks are therefore of general interest.
› dele™ razliｲnih virov, iz katerih se «nanciradelo:prostovoljniprispevki gospodarstva, prodaja standardov in dodatnih storitev (npr. veri«kacija),dr™avnesubvencije; pripravo in objavo standardov po postopku, ki vsem prizade-tim gospodarskim in dru™benim subjektom omogoｲa sodelo-vanje na prostovoljni podlagi.
France, Italy or Spain), is an indicator of this degree of de-pendence;
Njihove naloge so zato naloge v sploþnem interesu.
These bodies are, with one or two exceptions, very similar in terms of their constitution, their organs and their operating methods.
Razen nekaterih izjem so si ti organi zelo podobni po sestavi, organih in metodah dela.
They are, in most cases, centralised bodies in the form of as-sociations supported by the public authorities, which use the national standards as reference documents in speci«cationsforthe award of public contracts or for the preparation of national technical regulations.
› stopnja centralizacije organov, odgovornih za pripravo osnutkov standardov, ki se razlikuje glede na to, ali so ti organi povezani s pano™nimi zdru™enji (kot so v Franciji ali Nemｲiji) ali pa so del nacionalne institucije (kot v Zdru™enem kraljestvu);
› the degree of centralisation of the organs responsible for preparing draft standards, which varies according to wheth-er these organs are linked to trade associations (as in France or in Germany), or form part of the national institution (as in the United Kingdom);
V veｲini primerov so to centralizirani organi s statusom dru-þtev s podporo javnih organov, ki uporabljajo nacionalne stan-darde kot referenｲne dokumente za speci«kacijezaoddajo javnih naroｲil ali za pripravo nacionalnih tehniｲnih predpisov.
› the degree of involvement of the national standardisation body in the organisation of the technical work of CEN or CENELEC;
› stopnja vkljuｲenosti nacionalnega telesa za standardizacijo v organizacijo strokovnega dela CEN in CENELEC;
These institutes have the support of bodies which are normally decentralised and ensure the necessary consensus between the economic and social partners, namely sectoral technical committees composed of unpaid experts provided mainly by industry to prepare standards on subjects in the work pro-gramme; bodies providing logistical support and bringing about a consensus through a system of public enquiry; and bodies which publish and sell the standards adopted.
Tem inþtitutom pomagajo organi, ki so ponavadi decentralizi-rani in zagotavljajo potrebno soglasje med gospodarskimi in socialnimi partnerji, in sicer so to tehniｲni odbori, v katerih so-delujejo neplaｲani strokovnjaki, v glavnem iz gospodarstva, da pripravljajo standarde za predmete iz delovnega programa; organi, ki zagotavljajo logistiｲno podporo in s sistemom javnih obravnav skrbijo za doseganje soglasja; ter organi, ki objavljajo in prodajajo sprejete standarde.
The national standardisation bodies are all members of the Eu-ropean standardisation bodies, whether CEN or CENELEC, and generally also of ISO or the IEC.
Vsi nacionalni organi za standardizacijo so ｲlani evropskih orga-nov za standardizacijo, in sicer CEN ali CENELEC, obiｲajno pa tudi ISO in IEC.
This simpli«eddescriptionofthenationalstandardisationbod-ies does not cover di.erencesrelatingtofactorssuchas:
Ta poenostavljeni opis nacionalnih organov za standardizacijo ne zajema razlik v zvezi z dejavniki, kot so:
In de«ningtheconceptof`technicalregulation',Paragraph11provides information regarding the type of texts which must
Na eni strani imamo tehniｲne speci«kacijealidrugezahtevealipredpise o storitvah (glej zgornje opredelitve), ki jih doloｲajo dr™ave ｲlanice in ki se uporabljajo za industrijske in kmetijske proizvode ter storitve informacijske dru™be, na drugi strani pa
› the degree of dependence of the standardisation body on the public authorities.
› stopnja odvisnosti organa za standardizacijo od dr™avnih organov.
The legal form of the relationship be-tween the body and the State, formalised contractually (as in Germany or the United Kingdom) or by regulations (as in
To stopnjo odvisnosti ka™e pravna oblika odnosa med organom in dr™avo, ki je lahko urejen s pogodbo (kot je to v Nemｲiji ali Zdru™enem kraljestvu) ali s predpisi (kot je v Franciji, Italiji ali Þpaniji);
A list of national standardisation contacts is given in annex 2 to this booklet.
Seznam nacionalnih kontaktnih toｲk za standardizacijo je prikazan v Prilogi 2 k tej knji™ici.
However, the formal list of national standardisation bodies is to be found in annex II of the directive.
Vendar pa je uradni seznam nacionalnih organov za standardizacijo prikazan v Prilogi II k Direktivi.
In the United States and Canada, on the other hand, the publication of standards is the responsibility of several hundred specialist organisations, each in a speci«csector.
Nasprotno pa je v Zdru™enih dr™avah in Kanadi za objavo standardov odgovornih veｲ sto specializiranih organizacij, vsaka v svojem sektorju.
be noti«edundertheprocedurefortheprovisionofinforma-tion established by the Directive in this «eld.
zakone in druge predpise dr™av ｲlanic, ki prepovedujejo nekatere dejavnosti.
Certain technical speci«cations,`otherrequirements'orrulesonservices which meet the de«nitionoftechnicalregulationsareexcluded from the scope of the Directive, particularly if they comply with binding Community acts or are limited to imple-menting a judgment of the European Court of Justice, as s p e c i - « e d i n A r t i c l e 1 0 o ft h e D i r e c t i v e .
1. de jure, ko obvezno usklajenost z njimi uvede ukrep, ki ga izda neposredno ustrezen dr™avni organ ali mu ga lahko pripiþemo.
On the one hand there are the technical speci«cationsorotherrequirements or rules on services (see the above de«nitions),which are laid down by the Member States and which are ap-plicable to industrial and agricultural products and to Informa-tion Society services, and on the other there are the laws, regu-lations and administrative provisions of the Member States which prohibit certain speci«edactivities.
Da se tehniｲna speci«kacija,¶drugazahtevaƒalipredpisosto-ritvah þteje za tehniｲni predpis, mora izpolnjevati tele pogoje:
The `compulsory' nature of a technical speci«cation,an`otherrequirement' or a rule on services may be conferred upon them in two ways:
Na primer, pogoji v zvezi z maloserijsko proizvodnjo marme-lade in konzerviranega sadja, ki jih doloｲa uredba, se þtejejo za tehniｲni predpis, ki je obvezen de jure.
In order to qualify as a technical regulation, a technical speci«-cation, an `other requirement' or a rule on services must ful«lthe following conditions:
Ta lastnost, ki je sama po sebi znaｲilna za dokumente, ki jih pripravijo dr™avni organi, za katere se upo-rablja ta direktiva, je glavna razlika med tehniｲnim predpisom in standardom, ki ga pripravijo zasebni organi in je v bistvu neobvezen;
1. de jure, when compliance with them is made compulsory by a measure emanating directly from the relevant public au-thorities or attributable to the latter.
2. de facto, ｲe tehniｲne speci«kacijenepredpisujeuradeninzavezujoｲ dr™avni akt, vendar pa dr™ava priporoｲa, da se spoþtuje.
› it must be `compulsory' (i.e. `de jure' or `de facto' binding, see hereinafter).
› vplivati mora na tr™enje ali uporabo industrijskih in kmetij-skih proizvodov, opravljanje storitve ali ustanovitev dobavi-telja storitve v dr™avi ｲlanici ali njenem veｲjem delu.
This characteristic, which is inherent in the doc-uments prepared by the public authorities, to which this Di-rective applies, constitutes the major di.erencebetweenatechnical regulation and a standard, which is prepared by pri-vate bodies and is in essence voluntary;
Odstavek 11 naþteva tri primere najpomembnejþih in najpo-gostejþih de facto tehniｲnih predpisov v pojasnilo pojma, ki ni bil opredeljen v zaｲetni razliｲici Direktive in je povzroｲal raz-liｲna tolmaｲenja, ki so þkodila pravilnemu izvajanju postopka obveþｲanja.
By way of example, the conditions regarding the small-scale production of jam and preserved fruit, laid down by decree, will be considered to be a technical regulation which is man-datory de jure.
Tudi upravne doloｲbe, ki se uporabljajo za speci«kacijo,¶drugozahtevoƒ ali predpis o storitvah, so prav tako lahko tehniｲni predpisi v smislu Direktive.
The same will apply to a ban on using plastic bottles for the marketing of mineral water, as laid down by ordinance, etc.
Te ukrepe je po Direktivi treba pri-glasiti tako kot vse tehniｲne predpise, kadar jih predpiþejo cen-tralne vlade dr™av ｲlanic ali kateri od njihovih organov, kot je doloｲeno v seznamu, ki ga sestavi Komisija v okviru stalnega odbora iz Direktive.
› it must in‹uencethemarketingoruseofindustrialandagri-cultural products, the provision of a service or the establish-ment of a service operator, in a Member State or a signi«cantpart of that State.
› zakoni in drugi predpisi dr™ave ｲlanice, ki urejajo tehniｲne speci-«kacijealidrugezahtevealipredpiseostoritvahalipoklicneko-dekse ali pravila obnaþanja, ki pa se nanaþajo na tehniｲne speci«-kacije ali druge zahteve ali na predpise o storitvah, skladnost s katerimi ustvarja domnevo o skladnosti z obveznostmi, ki jih nalagajo zgoraj navedeni zakoni in drugi predpisi;
2. de facto, where the technical specification is not laid down by a formal and binding act of the State concerned, but where the State encourages its observance. As a result of the similar effects which they may have upon trade, these measures are considered equivalent to binding regula-tions.
Nekatere tehniｲne speci«kacije,¶drugezahteveƒalipredpisiostoritvah, ki ustrezajo opredelitvi tehniｲnega predpisa, so iz-vzeti s podroｲja uporabe Direktive, zlasti ｲe so skladni z zavezu-joｲimi akti Skupnosti ali omejeni na izvajanje sodbe Evropske-ga sodiþｲa, kot je doloｲeno v 10. ｲlenu Direktive.
Paragraph 11 gives three examples of the most important and the most frequent de facto technical regulations, in or-der to clarify a concept which was not de«nedintheinitialversion of the Directive and gave rise to di.erentinterpreta-tions that were prejudicial to the correct implementation of the information procedure.
¶Obveznaƒ narava se tehniｲni speci«kaciji,¶drugizahteviƒalipredpisu o storitvah lahko pripiþe na dva naｲina:
The administrative provisions applicable to a speci«cation,toan `other requirement' or to a rule on services can also consti-tute technical regulations within the meaning of the Direc-tive.
Navedeni zakoni in drugi predpisi so ukrepi, ki jih sprejmejo nacionalni organi in se sklicujejo na tehniｲne speci«kacijeali¶druge zahteveƒali na predpise o storitvah, ki jih ponavadi
These measures, as with all technical regulations, must be n o t i « e d u n d e r t h e D i r e c t i v e w h e n t h e y e m a n a t e f r o m t h e c e n t r a l governments of the Member States or from one of their authorities as s p e c i « e d i n t h e l i s t d r a w n up b y t h e C o m - m i s s i o n in the framework of the Standing Committee of the Directive.
V nadaljevanju bo razvidno, da usklajenost s standardom lahko po ｲlenu 7(2) Direktive v nekaterih primerih postane obvezna, tako da ta dobi status ¶tehniｲnega predpisaƒ.
De facto technical regulations include: ing to their origin in the private sector. They are nevertheless considered to be de facto technical regulations when the State is a signatory party to one of these agreements.
doloｲijo drugi organi in ne dr™ava (na primer nacionalni organ za standardizacijo) ter sami po sebi niso obvezni (standardi, strokovni kodeksi ali kodeksi ravnanja), vendar pa se spodbu-ja njihovo spoþtovanje, ker to ustvari domnevo o skladnosti z doloｲbami prej omenjenih ukrepov.