natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ms Margot WALLSTRÖM, Vice-President responsible for Institutional Relations and Communication, and Ms DAY participated in the meeting.
Na srečanju sta sodelovali podpredsednica Margot WALLSTRÖM, ki je odgovorna za institucionalne odnose in komunikacijsko strategijo, ter Catherine DAY.
29 November: Meeting with the Directors-General.
29. novembra: srečanje z generalnimi direktorji.
12 February: Meeting with Mr Dimitris DIMITRIADIS, President of the European Economic and Social Commi4 ee.
12. februarja: srečanje s predsednikom Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora Dimitrisom DIMITRIADISOM.
15 March: Meeting with Mr Rémy JACOB, Director-General of Strategy and Corporate Centre, and Mr Felismino ALCARPE, Deputy Head of Division of the European Investment Bank.
15. marca: srečanje z generalnim direktorjem centra za strateške in poslovne zadeve Rémyjem JACOBOM in namestnikom vodje oddelka pri Evropski investicijski banki Felisminom ALCARPEJEM.
30 March: Presentation by Mr Paul J. MAHONEY, President of the EU Civil Service Tribunal, to the European Ombudsman’s sta�.
30. marca: predstavitev predsednika Sodišča za uslužbence EU Paula J. MAHONEYJAuslužbencem Urada evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
2 July: Meetings with Mr Jean-Claude TRICHET, President of the European Central Bank, Mr Lucas D. PAPADEMOS, Vice-President, and Ms Gertrude TUMPEL-GUGERELL, Member of the Executive Board.
2. julija: srečanja s predsednikom Evropske centralne banke Jean-Claudom TRICHETOM, podpredsednikom Lucasom D. PAPADEMOSOM in članico izvršilnega odbora Gertrude TUMPEL-GUGERELL.
These were followed by a presentation to the Bank’s senior management sta�in Frankfurt, Germany.
Tem srečanjem je sledila predstavitev višjim vodstvenim uslužbencem te banke v Frankfurtu v Nemčiji. i.
16 July: Meeting with the President of the European Court of Justice, Mr Vassilios SKOURIS.
16. julija: srečanje s predsednikom Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti Vassiliosom SKOURISOM.
6 November: Meeting with Ambassador Vassilis KASKARELIS, Permanent Representative of Greece to the European Union.
6. novembra: srečanje z veleposlanikom Vassilisom KASKARELISOM, stalnim predstavnikom Grčije pri Evropski uniji. i.
7 December: Presentation by Mr Peter HUSTINX, European Data Protection Supervisor, to the European Ombudsman’s sta�.
7. decembra: predstavitev evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov Petra HUSTINXA uslužbencem Urada evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
Ombudsmen throughout the EU, at the national, regional and local levels, play a key role in ensuring that citizens’ rights under EU law are fully respected.
Varuhi človekovih pravic iz vse EU na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni imajo ključno vlogo pri zagotavljanju tega, da se v celoti spoštujejo državljanske pravice v skladu z zakonodajo EU.
The European Ombudsman cooperates closely with his counterparts to make sure that citizens’ complaints about EU law are dealt with promptly and e� ectively.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic tesno sodeluje s kolegi, da bi zagotovili hitro in učinkovito obravnavo pritožb državljanov zaradi zakonodaje EU.
This Chapter details the activities of the Network in 2007, the high point of which was the Sixth Seminar of National Ombudsmen of EU Member States and Candidate Countries.
V tem poglavju so natančno opisane dejavnosti mreže v letu 2007, od katerih je bil najpomembnejši dogodek šesti seminar nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic držav članic EU in držav kandidatk.
A detailed account of that event is given below.
Ta dogodek je podrobno opisan v nadaljevanju.
This development is seen as a key step in building a clearer public identity for the Network.
Ta razvoj je ključen za oblikovanje jasnejše javne podobe te mreže.
The Statement is reproduced in full in this chapter.
Izjava je v celoti navedena v tem poglavju.
THEEUROPEAN NETWORK OF OMBUDSMEN
EVROPSKA MREŽA VARUHOV ČLOVEKOVIHPRAVIC
The European Network of Ombudsmen consists of almost 90 o ces in 31 European countries.
V Evropsko mrežo varuhov človekovih pravic je vključenih skoraj 90 uradov v 31 evropskih državah.
Within the Union, it covers the ombudsmen and similar bodies at the European, national, and regional levels, while at the national level, it also includes Norway, Iceland, and the candidate countries for EU membership.
V Uniji združuje varuhe človekovih pravic in podobne organe na evropski, nacionalni in regionalni ravni, na nacionalni ravni pa vključuje tudi Norveško, Islandijo in države kandidatke za članstvo v EU.
Each of the national ombudsmen and similar bodies in the EU Member States, as well as in Norway and Iceland, has appointed a liaison o cer to act as a point of contact for other members of the Network.
Vsi nacionalni varuhi človekovih pravic in podobni organi v državah članicah EU ter na Norveškem in v Islandiji so imenovali uradnika za zvezo, ki je kontaktna oseba za druge člane mreže.
The Network was established in 1996 and has steadily developed into a powerful collaboration tool for ombudsmen and their sta�, serving as an e� ective mechanism for cooperation on case handling.
Mreža je bila ustanovljena leta 1996 in se je postopoma razvila v učinkovito orodje sodelovanja za varuhe človekovih pravic in njihovo osebje, ki jo uporabljajo kot učinkovit mehanizem za sodelovanje pri obravnavi primerov.
It is of particular importance to the European Ombudsman to enable him to deal promptly and e� ectively with complaints that fall outside his mandate.
Za evropskega varuha je še posebno pomembna, ker mu omogoča hitro in učinkovito obravnavo pritožb, ki so zunaj njegove pristojnosti.
Experiences and best practice are shared via seminars and meetings, a regular newsle4 er, an electronic discussion forum and a daily electronic news service.
Izkušnje in najboljša praksa se izmenjujejo na seminarjih in srečanjih, z rednim glasilom, elektronskim forumom in vsakodnevnim objavljanjem elektronskih novic.
Visits of the European Ombudsman organised by the ombudsmen in the Member States and accession countries have also proved highly e� ective in developing the Network.
Obiski evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, ki jih organizirajo varuhi po državah članicah in državah pristopnicah, so se tudi izkazali za zelo učinkovite pri razvoju mreže.
Section 5.1 therefore ends with a brief mention of the Ombudsman’s information visits in 2007.
Razdelek 5.1 se zato končuje s kratko predstavitvijo informativnih obiskov varuha v letu 2007.
These visits are covered in greater detail in section 6.2.
Ti obiski so podrobneje obravnavani v razdelku 6.2.
All of the activities described below are key to enabling ombudsmen to play their part in ensuring that EU law is applied correctly throughout the Union.
Vse spodaj opisane dejavnosti so ključnega pomena in varuhom omogočajo da opravljajo svojo vlogo pri zagotavljanju pravilne uporabe zakonodaje EU po vsej Uniji.
This is vital, if citizens are to enjoy their EU law rights to the full.
To je bistvenega pomena, da lahko državljani v celoti uveljavljajo svoje pravice po zakonodaji EU.
The European Ombudsman sees this as a particular priority and devotes considerable resources to developing the Network.
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic zato temu pripisuje poseben pomen in razvoju mreže namenja precej sredstev.
National ombudsmen seminars
Seminarji nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic
National ombudsmen seminars are held every two years, organised jointly by the European Ombudsman and a national counterpart.
Seminarji nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic potekajo vsaki dve leti, skupaj pa jih organizirata evropski varuh človekovih pravic in njegov nacionalni kolega.
The Sixth Seminar of the National Ombudsmen of EU Member States and Candidate Countries was organised by the French National Ombudsman, Mr Jean-Paul DELEVOYE, and the European Ombudsman.
Šesti seminar nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic iz držav članic Evropske unije in držav kandidatk sta skupaj organizirala francoski nacionalni varuh človekovih pravic Jean-Paul DELEVOYE in evropski varuh človekovih pravic. Potekal je v Strasbourgu od 14. do 16. oktobra 2007.
This was the second national ombudsmen seminar to take place in Strasbourg, just over eleven years a er the first-ever such seminar which was organised in September 1996.
To je bil drugi seminar nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic, organiziran v tem mestu. Od prvega, septembra 1996, je minilo malo več kot enajst let.
All 27 EU Member States were represented at the meeting, as were two of the three candidate countries, plus Norway and Iceland.
Udeležilo se ga je vseh 27 držav članic in tudi dve izmed treh držav kandidatk ter Norveška in Islandija.
As agreed at the Fi h Seminar, regional ombudsman representatives from the EU countries where they exist, namely, Belgium, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria, and the United Kingdom1, were also invited to take part for the first time.
Kot so se dogovorili na petem seminarju, so prvič povabili k udeležbi tudi regionalne varuhe človekovih pravic iz držav Evropske unije, v katerih jih poznajo, to je iz Belgije, Nemčije, Španije, Italije, Avstrije in Združenega kraljestva1.
The theme of the 2007 Seminar was “Rethinking good administration in the European Union”.
Tema seminarja leta 2007 je bila „Premislek o dobrem upravljanju v Evropski uniji“.
This theme was chosen in knowledge of the fact that a number of ombudsmen, whether at the regional, national, or European levels, representing di� erent administrative cultures and traditions, have been reflecting on ways to refine, rethink and deepen their understanding of good administration, with an eye to improving the quality of service o� ered to citizens and, more generally, to users of the public administrations that they oversee.
Za to temo so se odločili zaradi dejstva, da številni varuhi človekovih pravic na regionalni, nacionalni ali evropski ravni, ki zastopajo različne upravne kulture in tradicije, razmišljajo o načinih, kako izboljšati, na novo opredeliti in poglobiti svoje razumevanje dobrega upravljanja, da bi izboljšali kakovost storitev, ki jih ponujajo državljanom in na sploh uporabnikom javne uprave, ki jo nadzirajo. Izkazalo se je, da je bila tema dobro izbrana.
The la4 er underlined Europe’s role in spreading the values of tolerance, dialogue and democracy throughout the world.
Ta je poudaril vlogo, ki jo ima Evropa pri širjenju vrednot, kot so strpnost, dialog in demokracija, po vsem svetu.
Ombudsmen in Europe represent one of the most obvious manifestations of these values, he said.
Dejal je, da so varuhi človekovih pravic v Evropi ena izmed najočitnejših pojavnih oblik teh vrednot.
When ombudsmen supervise the application of a body of EU law that is becoming increasingly important, they are on the front line of those who are building Europe, concretely, day by day.
Ko varuhi človekovih pravic nadzorujejo izvajanje nekega zakona Evropske unije, katerega pomembnost raste, so v ospredju skupaj s tistimi, ki dan za dnem dejansko gradijo Evropo.
Keynote speech
Osrednji nagovor
Judge Allan ROSAS, President of the Third Chamber at the European Court of Justice, launched the Seminar discussions with a keynote speech entitled “Ensuring uniform application of EU law in a Union of 27: the role of national courts and authorities”.
Sodnik Allan ROSAS, predsednik tretjega senata Sodišča evropskih skupnosti (ECJ), je odprl razprave na seminarju z osrednjim nagovorom z naslovom „Zagotavljanje enotne uporabe prava Evropske unije v Uniji 27: vloga nacionalnih sodišč in oblasti“.
These countries are listed in the EU protocol order.
Imena držav so navedena v protokolarnem vrstnem redu Evropske unije. e.
RELATIONS WITH OMBUDSMEN ANDSIMILARBODIES including national administrative authorities.
ODNOSIZ VARUHIČLOVEKOVIHPRAVICINPODOBNIMI ORGANI izmed bistvenih značilnosti prava Evropske unije ta, da ga morajo vsi uporabljati neposredno, vključno z nacionalnimi upravnimi organi.
He stressed that national ombudsmen play a particularly important role in the monitoring of administrative decisions and practices concerning the application and implementation of not only purely national but also EU law.
Poudaril je posebno pomembno vlogo nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic pri spremljanju upravnih sklepov in praks v zvezi z uporabo in izvajanjem ne samo izključno nacionalnega prava, temveč tudi prava Evropske unije.
It would be a mistake to rely exclusively on the judicial system to ensure the correct application of EU law, he said.
Dejal je, da bi storili napako, če bi se zanašali izključno na pravosodni sistem za zagotavljanje pravilne uporabe prava Evropske unije.
In his view, the citizen much prefers to have the principles of legality and of good administration, recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, respected right away, without any need to resort to court proceedings which may be lengthy and costly.
Po njegovem mnenju državljani dosti raje vidijo, da se načela zakonitosti in dobrega upravljanja, zapisana v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravic, spoštujejo sama po sebi, tako da se ni treba zatekati k sodnim postopkom, ki so lahko dolgi in dragi.
In this regard, it is important to recall that one of the cornerstones of the EU legal edifice is its direct relevance for the private citizen, who can invoke it directly before courts and administrative authorities.
V zvezi s tem se je pomembno spomniti, da je eden izmed temeljev pravne zgradbe Evropske unije njena neposredna pomembnost za posameznega državljana, saj jo lahko ta neposredno uveljavlja pred sodišči in upravnimi organi.
He confirmed that the work of ombudsmen contributes to a strengthening of the role of the citizen.
Potrdil je, da delo varuhov človekovih pravic prispeva k utrjevanju vloge državljana.
The case-law of the European Court of Justice on Union citizenship has also contributed to this emphasis on a “Citizens’ Europe”.
Sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča o evropskem državljanstvu je prav tako prispevala k poudarjanju „Evrope državljanov“.
Judge Allan ROSAS, President of the Third Chamber at the European Court of Justice, gives the keynote speech to the Sixth Seminar of National Ombudsmen of EU Member States and Candidate Countries. Strasbourg, 15 October 2007.
Predsednik tretjega senata Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti sodnik Allan ROSAS med osrednjim govoromna šestem seminarju nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic držav članic EU in držav kandidatk.Strasbourg, 15. oktobra 2007.
With regard to the issue of uniform application referred to in the title of his speech, the Judge acknowledged that decentralised application poses a challenge.
Glede vprašanja enotne uporabe, ki je bila omenjena v naslovu sodnikovega govora, je ta priznal, da pomeni decentralizirana uporaba izziv.
The problem has not been diminished by the enlargement of the EU to encompass by now 27 Member States.
K odpravi problema pa nikakor ni prispevala širitev Evropske unije, ki zdaj vključuje 27 držav članic.
Decentralisation, in his view, should be coupled with co-ordination and co-operation, responsibility, accountability and transparency.
Po njegovem mnenju bi decentralizacijo morali spremljati usklajevanje in sodelovanje, pristojnost, odgovornost in preglednost.
National institutions for monitoring and control, and co-ordination between such institutions and institutions at EU level, are of crucial importance.
Pri tem so ključnega pomena nacionalne institucij e za spremljanje in nadzor ter usklajevanje med temi institucijami in institucijami na ravni Evropske unije.
In this regard, Judge ROSAS welcomed the organisation of regular national ombudsmen seminars.
Zato je sodnik ROSAS pozdravil prirejanje rednih seminarjev nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic.
Mr Jens NYMAND-CHRISTENSEN, Director responsible for Better Regulation and Institutional Issues at the Secretariat-General of the European Commission, addresses the Sixth Seminar of National Ombudsmen of EU Member States and Candidate Countries. Strasbourg, 15 October 2007.
Direktor pri generalnem sekretariatu Evropske komisije Jens NYMAND CHRISTENSEN, ki je odgovoren za boljšo pravno ureditev in institucionalna vprašanja, med govorom na šestem seminarju nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic držav članic EU in držav kandidatk. Strasbourg, 15. oktobra 2007.
Mr DIAMANDOUROS was the opening speaker in the first thematic session, which was chaired by the National Ombudsman of Ireland, Ms Emily O’REILLY.
Srečanje 1 je odprl Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS, predsedovala pa mu je irska nacionalna varuhinja človekovih pravic Emily O’REILLY.
His presentation focused, in particular, on the notion of “life beyond legality”.
Predstavitev DIAMANDOUROSA je bila posebej osredotočena na pojem „življenja, ki presega gole zakonske okvire“.
In his view, the continued existence of conceptual space for life beyond legality is positive for European citizens.
Po njegovem mnenju je nadaljnji obstoj konceptualnega prostora za življenje, ki presega gole zakonske okvire, pozitiven za Evropske državljane.
Firstly, law and legality continue to be closely associated with blame and sanctions.
Pravo in zakonitost sta namreč še vedno tesno povezana predvsem s krivdo in kaznijo.
But a culture of service, which ombudsmen should be keen to promote, is not a culture of blame, he said.
Kultura storitev, ki bi jo varuhi človekovih pravic morali spodbujati, pa po njegovih besedah ni kultura krivde.
Moreover, any a4 empt to promote a service culture through law might only reinforce a narrow and legalistic approach.
Ne samo to, vsak poskus spodbujanja storitvene kulture skozi pravo bi lahko le okrepil ozkogledi in legalistični pristop.
At the same time, it might also encourage the tendency of some complainants to regard their complaint as a denunciation, rather than as an instrument for seeking practical redress, or a constructive solution to a problem.
Sočasno bi pa lahko spodbudil tudi nagnjenost nekaterih pritožnikov, da imajo svoje pritožbe za ovadbe in ne za sredstva za doseganje praktične poprave krivic ali konstruktivne rešitve problema.
A second relevant consideration concerns the relationship between the work of ombudsmen and the work of the courts.
Druga pomembna ugotovitev se nanaša na razmerje med delom varuhov človekovih pravic in delom sodišč.
The logic of judicial procedures leads to adjudication, in which the court determines authoritatively the legal rights of the parties.
Logika sodnih postopkov vodi k sodni obravnavi, v kateri sodišče avtoritativno ugotovi pravne pravice strank v postopku.
The logic of the Ombudsman’s procedures, on the other hand, is di� erent and involves flexibility between two modes of operation.
Po drugi strani pa je logika postopkov varuha človekovih pravic drugačna in zahteva prilagodljivost med dvema načinoma delovanja.
On the one hand, there is a dispute-resolution mode, which focuses on problem-solving, conflict-reduction, possibilities for compromise and win-win outcomes.
Po eni strani najdemo način spor–rešitev, ki se osredotoča na reševanje problemov, obvladovanje sporov, možnosti za kompromis in rešitve, ki ustrezajo obema stranema.
On the other hand, there is an adjudicative mode, in which the Ombudsman finds either that there is maladministration, or that there is no maladministration.
Po drugi strani pa imamo način razsojanja, v katerem varuh človekovih pravic ugotovi, ali da nepravilnosti so ali da jih ni.
That mode is governed by a logic analogous to that of the Court, in which one party usually sees itself as the winner and the other as the loser.
Temu načinu delovanja vlada logika, ki je analogna logiki sodišča, kjer se ena od strani v postopku običajno vidi kot zmagovalec in druga kot poraženec.
The appropriate balance between the two modes depends on the case and some cases may involve switching between them more than once.
Ustrezno ravnotežje med obema načinoma je odvisno od samega primera in lahko v določenih primerih zahteva tudi večkratno spremembo načina delovanja.
In Mr DIAMANDOUROS’ view, the European Institutions are encouraged to co-operate with him in the dispute-resolution mode by the knowledge that his inquiry is not exclusively focused on the question “what are the legal rights of the parties?”
DIAMANDOUROS meni, da spodbuja evropske institucij e k sodelovanju z njim v načinu spor–rešitev z zavedanjem, da njegova preiskava ni izključno usmerjena na vprašanje, „katere pravne pravice imajo strani v postopku“.
Mr Alex BRENNINKME ER, National Ombudsman of The Netherlands, and Mr Joseph SAID PULLICINO, National Ombudsman of Malta, followed up as the discussants during this session.
Razpravo na tem srečanju sta nato nadaljevala Alex BRENNINKMEIJER, nizozemski nacionalni varuh človekovih pravic, in Joseph SAID PULLICINO, malteški nacionalni varuh človekovih pravic.
According to Mr BRENNINKME ER, citizens demand much more than legality.
Po mnenju BRENNINKMEIJERJA zahtevajo državljani več kot samo zakonitost.
They require good administration and proper conduct, which helps to create acceptance, legitimacy and ultimately public confidence in government.
Zahtevajo dobro upravljanje in pravilno ravnanje, kar pomaga ustvarjati ozračje sprejemanja, legitimnosti in nenazadnje zaupanja javnosti v delovanje vlade.
Proper conduct and fair treatment of citizens are an essential addition to pure legality.
Pravilno ravnanje in poštena obravnava državljanov sta bistvena dodatka k popolni zakonitosti.
Mr SAID PULLICINO agreed that the test of good administration covers a much wider spectrum of activity than strict legality.
SAID PULLICINO se je strinjal, da preskus dobrega upravljanja zajema dosti širši spekter delovanja kot stroga zakonitost.
When maladministration does not involve illegality, it can still be measured against the sti� er test of the principles of good administration that are gaining recognition as an informal source of law.
Tudi kadar nepravilnost ne vključuje nezakonitosti, jo še vedno lahko primerjamo z dosti strožjim preskusom načel dobrega upravljanja, ki postaja čedalje bolj priznan neformalni vir prava.
Good administration, like legality, always implies respect for the rule of law and is never a licence to act in any way outside or contrary to law.
Dobro upravljanje tako kot zakonitost vedno implicira spoštovanje vladavine prava in ga nikoli ne moremo razumeti kot dovoljenje za delovanje zunaj zakona ali proti njemu.
Good administration, like legality, is also about operating in such a way that the citizen, the administration’s client, receives the level of service that he or she is entitled to.
Dobro upravljanje, tako kot zakonitost, pomeni tudi tako delovanje, da državljan, stranka uprave, dobi takšno raven storitev, do kakršne je upravičen.
A Europe of Results — Prevention, Partnership and Transparency
Evropa rezultatov – preventiva, partnerstvo in preglednost
The next speaker was Mr Jens NYMAND-CHRISTENSEN, Director responsible for Be4 er Regulation and Institutional Issues at the Secretariat-General of the European Commission.
Naslednji govor je imel Jens NYMAND-CHRISTENSEN, direktor, odgovoren za boljšo zakonodajo in institucionalne zadeve Generalnega sekretariata Evropske komisije.
His intervention was entitled “A Europe of Results — Prevention, Partnership and Transparency”.
Njegov prispevek je imel naslov „Evropa rezultatov – preventiva, partnerstvo in preglednost“.
Mr NYMAND-CHRISTENSEN focused on the Communication adopted by the Commission in September 2007, which itself bears the title A Europe of Results — Applying Community law2.
NYMAND-CHRISTENSEN se je osredotočil na Sporočilo, ki ga je Komisija sprejela septembra 2007 in ki prav tako nosi naslov Evropa rezultatov - uporaba prava Skupnosti2.
The Communication puts forward a series of proposals to improve the application of Community law by Member States.
Sporočilo poudarja skupek predlogov za izboljšanje uporabe prava Skupnosti, ki bi ga izvajale države članice.
These proposals aim to ensure that Community law is implemented more e� ectively and that complaints made by citizens and business are resolved more quickly.
Namen teh predlogov je zagotoviti, da se bo pravo Skupnosti učinkoviteje izvajalo in da bodo pritožbe državljanov in podjetij rešene hitreje.