natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
— the Commission of the European Communities, by R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agent, having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion, gives the following
– za Komisijo Evropskih skupnosti R. Vidal Puig, zastopnik, na podlagi sklepa, sprejetega po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca, da bo v zadevi razsojeno brez sklepnih predlogov, izreka naslednjo
This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Articles 3(2) and 10(1) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na razlago členov 3(2) in 10(1) Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/21/ES z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (okvirna direktiva) (UL L 108, str.
33) (‘the Framework Directive’), read in conjunction with Recital (11) in the preamble thereto.
33, v nadaljevanju: okvirna direktiva) v povezavi z enajsto uvodno izjavo te direktive.
The reference has been made in the course of an action in which the Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones (‘the CMT’) is seeking the annulment of all or part of Royal Decree 2296/2004 adopting the regulation on electronic communications markets, network access and numbering (Real Decreto 2296/2004 por el que
Ta predlog je bil vložen v okviru tožbe, s katero je Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones (v nadaljevanju: CMT) zahtevala, da se kraljevi dekret 2296/2004 o sprejetju uredbe o trgih elektronskih komunikacij, o dostopu do omrežij in �tevilčenja (Real Decreto 2296/2004 por el que se aprueba el Reglamento sobre mercados
JUDGMENT OF 6. 3. 2008 — CASE C-82/07 se aprueba el Reglamento sobre mercados de comunicaciones electrónicas, acceso a las redes y numeración) of 10 December 2004 (BOE No 314 of 30 December 2004, p.
SODBA Z DNE 6. 3. 2008 – ZADEVA C-82/07 de comunicaciones electrónicas, acceso a las redes y numeración) z dne 10. decembra 2004 (BOE �t. 314, 30.12. 2004, str.
38890) (‘the GTL’) which transposed the Framework Directive into national law.
38890, v nadaljevanju: LGT), s katerim je bila v nacionalno pravo prenesena okvirna direktiva.
Community legal framework
Skupnostna ureditev
Recital (11) in the preamble to the Framework Directive states:
Enajsta uvodna izjava okvirne direktive določa:
‘In accordance with the principle of the separation of regulatory and operational functions, Member States should guarantee the independence of the national regulatory authority or authorities with a view to ensuring the impartiality of their decisions.
„V skladu z načelom ločevanja regulativnih in obratovalnih funkcij naj države članice zajamčijo neodvisnost nacionalnega regulativnega organa ali organov, da bi zagotovile nepristranskost njihovih sklepov.
National regulatory authori- ties should be in possession of all the necessary resources, in terms of staffing, expertise, and financial means, for the performance of their tasks.’
Nacionalni regulativni organi naj imajo pri izvajanju svojih nalog na voljo vse potrebne vire glede zaposlovanja, strokovnega znanja in izku�enj ter finančnih sredstev.“
Recital (20) of that directive states:
Dvajseta uvodna izjava te direktive določa:
‘Access to numbering resources on the basis of transparent, objective and nondiscriminatory criteria is essential for undertakings to compete in the electronic communications sector.
„Dostop do �tevilskih virov na podlagi preglednih, objektivnih in nepristranskih meril je temeljni pogoj za konkurenco podjetij v elektronskem komunikacijskem sektorju.
Article 2(g) of the Framework Directive defines the ‘national regulatory authority’ as ‘the body or bodies charged by a Member State with any of the regulatory tasks assigned in this Directive and the Specific Directives’.
Člen 2(g) okvirne direktive določa, da „nacionalni regulativni organ“ pomeni „organ ali organe, ki jih država članica zadolži za opravljanje katerekoli regulativne naloge, dodeljene v tej direktivi in v posebnih direktivah“.
Under Article 2(m) of the Framework Directive, the ‘provision of an electronic communications network’ is defined as the establishment, operation, control or making available of such a network.
Člen 2(m) te direktive določa, da „zagotovitev elektronskega komunikacijskega omrežja“ pomeni vzpostavitev, obratovanje, upravljanje ali zagotavljanje dostopnosti takega omrežja.
Article 3 of the Framework Directive, entitled ‘National regulatory authorities’, provides:
Člen okvirne direktive z naslovom „Nacionalni regulativni organi“ določa:
Member States shall ensure that each of the tasks assigned to national regulatory authorities in this Directive and the Specific Directives is undertaken by a competent body.
Države članice poskrbijo, da vsako nalogo, dodeljeno nacionalnim regulativnim organom s to direktivo ali posebnimi direktivami, prevzame pristojni organ.
Member States shall guarantee the independence of national regulatory authorities by ensuring that they are legally distinct from and functionally independent of all organisations providing electronic communications networks, equipment or services.
Države članice zajamčijo neodvisnost nacionalnih regulativnih organov tako, da zagotovijo njihovo pravno ločenost in funkcijsko neodvisnost od vseh organizacij, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja, opremo ali storitve.
Member States that retain ownership or control of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or services shall ensure effective structural separation of the regulatory function from activities associated with ownership or control.
Države članice, ki ohranijo lastni�tvo ali nadzor nad podjetji, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in/ali storitve, zagotovijo dejansko strukturno ločitev regulativne funkcije od dejavnosti, povezanih z lastni�tvom ali nadzorom.
2008 — CASE C-82/07
2008 – ZADEVA C-82/07
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities exercise their powers impartially and transparently.
Države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalni regulativni organi izvajajo svoja pooblastila nepristransko in pregledno.
Member States shall publish the tasks to be undertaken by national regulatory authorities in an easily accessible form, in particular where those tasks are assigned to more than one body.
Države članice objavijo naloge, ki jih morajo opraviti nacionalni regulativni organi, v preprosto dostopni obliki, zlasti kadar so te naloge dodeljene več kot enemu organu.
Member States shall ensure, where appropriate, consultation and cooperation between those authorities, and between those authorities and national authorities entrusted with the implementation of competition law and national authorities entrusted with the implementation of consumer law, on matters of common interest.
Države članice pri zadevah v skupnem interesu zagotovijo, kadar je to primerno, posvetovanje in sodelovanje med temi organi ter med temi organi in nacionalnimi organi, poobla�čenimi za izvajanje konkurenčnega prava, in nacionalnimi organi, poobla�čenimi za izvajanje prava varstva potro�nikov.
Where more than one authority has competence to address such matters, Member States shall ensure that the respective tasks of each authority are published in an easily accessible form.
Kadar je več kot en organ pristojen za re�evanje takih zadev, države članice zagotovijo objavo zadevnih nalog vsakega organa v preprosto dostopni obliki.
Member States shall notify to the Commission all national regulatory authorities assigned tasks under this Directive and the Specific Directives, and their respective responsibilities’.
Države članice uradno obvestijo Komisijo o vseh nalogah, dodeljenih nacionalnim regulativnim organom po tej direktivi in posebnih direktivah, ter o njihovih nalogah.“
Paragraph 1 of Article 10 of the Framework Directive, which is entitled ‘Numbering, naming and addressing’, provides:
Člen 10(1) te direktive z naslovom „Številčenje, poimenovanje in naslavljanje“ določa:
‘Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities control the assignment of all national numbering resources and the management of the national
„Države članice poskrbijo, da nacionalni regulativni organi nadzorujejo dodeljevanje vseh nacionalnih �tevilskih virov in upravljanje nacionalnih načrtov �tevilčenja.
Member States shall ensure that adequate numbers and numbering ranges are provided for all publicly available electronic communications services.
Države članice poskrbijo, da so na voljo ustrezne �tevilke in območja �tevilčenja za vse javnosti dostopne elektronske komunikacijske storitve.
National regulatory authorities shall establish objective, transparent and nondiscriminatory assigning procedures for national numbering resources.’
Nacionalni regulativni organi določijo objektivne, pregledne in nediskiminacijske postopke za dodeljevanje nacionalnih �tevilskih virov.“
On 9 December 2005, the CMT lodged an application with the Tribunal Supremo seeking the annulment, with cessation of effects, of Articles 27(1), 27(3), 28(2), 34, 36, 38, 40(1), 40(3), 49 and 55 of Royal Decree 2296/2004 and paragraphs 5(4) and 10(1) of the National Telephone Numbering Plan, annexed to that decree, on the ground that they are contrary to the GTL.
CTM je 9. decembra 2005 na Tribunal Supremo vložila tožbo za razglasitev ničnosti členov 27(1) in (3), 28(2), 34, 36, 38, 40(1) in (3), 49 in 55 kraljevega dekreta 2296/2004 ter točk 5.4 in 10.1 nacionalnega načrta telefonskega �tevilčenja, ki je priloga tega dekreta, ker naj bi bili v nasprotju z določbami LGT.
The CMT submits that those provisions do not respect the division of powers, with respect to the management of public numbering resources, provided for in Articles 16 and 48 of the GTL.
CMT zatrjuje, da se s temi določbami ne spo�tuje razdelitve pristojnosti glede upravljanja s �tevilskimi viri, ki je določena v členih 16 in 48 LGT.
The residual competence of the Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Commerce in that field, provided for under earlier legislative provisions and those of the GTL, is set out in such detail in Royal Decree 2296/2004 that the role of the CTM is reduced merely to implementing the decisions taken by that ministry.
Neprenesena pristojnost ministrstva za industrijo, turizem in trgovino na tem področju, določena s predhodnimi zakonskimi določbami in z določbami LGT, naj bi bila natančno določena z določbami kraljevega dekreta 2296/2004 tako, da naj bi se naloge CMT zmanj�ale in naj bi obsegale le �e izvajanje odločb tega ministrstva.
Further, the CTM argues that the royal decree goes beyond the GTL, in breach of the principles of legality, the hierarchy of norms and legal certainty, and disregards the provisions of Article 10(1) of the Framework Directive.
CMT je zatrjevala tudi, da je bil s tem kraljevim dekretom prekoračen LGT in s tem kr�eno načelo zakonitosti, hierarhije pravnih aktov in pravne varnosti, v njem pa tudi niso bile upo�tevane določbe člena 10(1) okvirne direktive.
By judgment of 23 January 2007, the Tribunal Supremo decided to stay proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
S sodbo z dne 23. januarja 2007 je Tribunal Supremo prekinilo odločanje in je Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo ti vpra�anji:
It should be noted at the outset that, according to Recital (1) of the Framework Directive, the new regulatory framework for telecommunications — namely, Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
Uvodoma ugotovimo, da je v prvi uvodni izjavi okvirne direktive določeno, da je bil novi regulativni okvir za telekomunikacije, in sicer okvirne direktive 2002/20/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev (direktiva o odobritvi) (UL L 108, str.
21), Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights
21), 2002/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami (direktiva
51), and Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
51) in 2002/19/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju (direktiva o dostopu) (UL L 108, str.
7) — was adopted after the previous regulatory framework had been successful in creating the conditions for effective competition in the telecommunications sector during the transition from monopoly to full competition.
7), sprejet, čeprav so bile s prej�njim regulativnim okvirom za telekomunikacije ustvarjene razmere za učinkovito konkurenco v telekomunikacijskem sektorju v času prehoda z monopola na popolno konkurenco.
That is the appropriate context in which to assess Recital (11) of the Framework Directive, according to which the Member States must, under the principle of the separation of regulatory and operational functions, guarantee the independence of the national regulatory authority or authorities (‘the regulatory authorities’) in order to ensure the impartiality of their decisions.
To je treba upo�tevati pri presoji enajste uvodne izjave okvirne direktive, ki določa, da naj države članice v skladu z načelom ločevanja regulativnih in obratovalnih funkcij zajamčijo neodvisnost nacionalnega regulativnega organa ali organov (v nadaljevanju: regulativni organi), da bi zagotovile nepristranskost njihovih sklepov.
Article 3(2) of the Framework Directive specifies the means by which it should be possible to guarantee the independence of the regulatory authorities, providing that they must be legally distinct from and functionally independent of all organisations providing electronic communications networks, equipment or services.
Člen 3(2) okvirne direktive določa, da se zajamči neodvisnost nacionalnih regulativnih organov tako, da zagotovijo njihovo pravno ločenost in funkcijsko neodvisnost od vseh organizacij, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja, opremo ali storitve.
Where Member States retain ownership or control of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or services, they are to take care, specifically, to ensure effective structural separation of the regulatory function, on the one hand, from activities associated with ownership or control of those undertakings, on the other.
Države članice, ki ohranijo lastni�tvo ali nadzor nad podjetji, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in/ali storitve, zagotovijo dejansko strukturno ločitev regulativne funkcije od dejavnosti, povezanih z lastni�tvom ali nadzorom.
As regards the assigning of the national numbering resources and the management of the national numbering plans, it should be pointed out at the outset that such functions form no part of the functions exercised by entities which ensure services
Najprej pojasnimo, da funkcije dodeljevanja nacionalnih �tevilskih virov in upravljanja nacionalnih načrtov �tevilčenja niso del funkcij organov, ki zagotavljajo
2008 — CASE C-82/07 and/or networks provision, as defined in Article 2(m) of the Framework Directive.
2008 – ZADEVA C-82/07 ponudbo storitev in/ali omrežij, kot je opredeljena v členu 2(m) okvirne direktive.
They must therefore be regarded, not as ‘operational functions’ within the meaning of Recital (11) of that directive, but as ‘regulatory functions’.
Zato jih ne obravnavamo kot „obratovalne funkcije“ v smislu enajste uvodne izjave te direktive, ampak kot „regulativne funkcije“.
Moreover, the referring court seems to be unsure whether the Framework Directive allows Member States to allocate, on the one hand, the regulatory functions, and on the other, the management functions involved in assigning national numbering resources and national numbering plans, to separate regulatory authorities.
Predložitveno sodi�če spra�uje, ali okvirna direktiva državam članicam omogoča, da dodelijo različnim regulativnim organom tako regulativne funkcije kot obratovalne funkcije glede dodeljevanja nacionalnih �tevilskih virov in upravljanja nacionalnih načrtov �tevilčenja.
In that regard, it is clear from Article 10(1) of the Framework Directive, read in conjunction with Article 3(2) thereof, that (i) Member States must allocate to one or more regulatory authorities control of the assignment of all national numbering resources, as well as the management of the national numbering plans; (ii) those regulatory authorities must be legally distinct from and functionally independent of all organisations providing electronic communications networks, equipment or services; and (iii) Member States which retain ownership or control of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or services must ensure effective structural separation of activities associated with ownership or control of those undertakings, on the one hand, and regulatory functions (including the assignment of national numbering resources and the management of the national numbering plans), on the other.
Glede tega iz člena 10(1) v povezavi s členom 3(2) okvirne direktive izhaja, da morajo države članice poskrbeti, da en ali več regulativnih organov nadzoruje dodeljevanje vseh nacionalnih �tevilskih virov in upravljanje nacionalnih načrtov �tevilčenja, da so ti organi pravno ločeni in funkcijsko neodvisni od vseh organizacij, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja, opremo ali storitve, in da države članice, ki ohranijo lastni�tvo ali nadzor nad podjetji, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in/ali storitve, zagotovijo dejansko strukturno ločitev regulativne funkcije od dejavnosti, povezanih z lastni�tvom ali nadzorom teh podjetij, vključno z dodeljevanjem nacionalnih �tevilskih virov in upravljanjem nacionalnih načrtov �tevilčenja.
That finding is substantiated both by Recital (11) of the Framework Directive, in accordance with which Member States should guarantee the independence of the national regulatory authority or authorities, and by Article 3(4) of that directive, which provides that Member States must publish the tasks to be undertaken by those regulatory authorities, in particular where those tasks are assigned to more than one body.
Ta ugotovitev je podkrepljena tako z enajsto uvodno izjavo okvirne direktive, s katero se države članice obvezuje, naj zajamčijo neodvisnost nacionalnega regulativnega organa ali organov, kot tudi s členom 3(4) iste direktive, ki določa, da morajo države članice objaviti naloge, ki jih morajo opraviti nacionalni regulativni organi, zlasti kadar so te naloge dodeljene več kot enemu organu.
Moreover, the potentially pluralist nature of regulatory authorities is clear from the very definition of ‘national regulatory authority’ set out in Article 2(g) of the Framework Directive.
Dejstvo, da gre lahko za več regulativnih organov, izhaja iz same opredelitve „nacionalni regulativni organ“ iz člena 2(g) te direktive.
In contrast, it must be noted that there is no provision in the Framework Directive, under which the regulatory authority to which the tasks of assigning national numbering resources and management of national numbering plans have been assigned is required to be distinct from or independent of the other regulatory authorities and, in particular, from the authority with responsibility for adopting the national numbering plan or the control and management procedures of that plan.
Nasprotno pa ugotovimo, da nobena določba okvirne direktive ne določa, da mora biti regulativni organ, ki so mu dodeljene funkcije dodeljevanja nacionalnih �tevilskih virov in upravljanja nacionalnih načrtov �tevilčenja, drug ali neodvisen od preostalih regulativnih organov in zlasti od tistega, ki sprejme nacionalni načrt �tevilčenja ali postopke nadzora in upravljanja tega načrta.
In the light of all of the foregoing, the reply to the first question must be that Articles 3(2), 3(4) and 10(1) of the Framework Directive, read in conjunction with Recital (11) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that the assignment of the national numbering resources and the management of the national numbering plans must be regarded as regulatory functions.
Glede na zgoraj navedene ugotovitve je odgovor na prvo vpra�anje, da je treba člen 3(2) in (4) ter člen 10(1) okvirne direktive v povezavi z enajsto uvodno izjavo te direktive razlagati tako, da se funkcije dodeljevanja nacionalnih �tevilskih virov in upravljanja nacionalnih načrtov �tevilčenja obravnava kot regulativne funkcije.
Member States are not required to allocate those different functions to separate regulatory authorities.
Države članice niso zavezane dodeliti teh različnih funkcij različnim regulativnim organom.
By its second question, the referring court wishes to know whether a Member State may allocate the regulatory functions referred to in Article 10(1) of the Framework Directive to a number of regulatory authorities.
V drugem vpra�anju predložitveno sodi�če spra�uje, ali lahko država članica dodeli regulativne funkcije iz člena 10(1) okvirne direktive več regulativnim organom.
It is clear from the wording of Articles 2(g) and 10(1) of the Framework Directive that it is possible for more than one regulatory authority to have control over the assignment of national numbering resources and the management of national numbering plans.
Iz členov 2(g) in 10(1) okvirne direktive jasno izhaja, da lahko več regulativnih organov nadzoruje dodeljevanje vseh nacionalnih �tevilskih virov in upravljanje nacionalnih načrtov �tevilčenja.
Although the Member States enjoy institutional autonomy as regards the organisation and the structuring of their regulatory authorities within the meaning of Article 2(g) of the Framework Directive, that autonomy may be exercised only in accordance with the objectives and obligations laid down in that directive.
Čeprav imajo države članice institucionalno avtonomijo pri organizaciji in strukturi njihovih regulativnih organov v smislu člena 2(g) okvirne direktive, se lahko ta avtonomija izvaja le ob upo�tevanju ciljev in obveznosti, ki jih določa ta direktiva.
Thus, in accordance with Article 3(2), (4) and (6) of the Framework Directive, the Member States must not only guarantee the functional independence of regulatory authorities in relation to the organisations providing electronic communications networks, equipment or services, but must also publish, in an easily accessible form, the tasks to be undertaken by the national regulatory authorities, and notify to the Commission the names of the regulatory authorities entrusted with carrying out those tasks, and their respective responsibilities.
Tako morajo države članice v skladu s členom 3(2), (4) in (6) te direktive poleg zajamčenja funkcijske neodvisnosti regulativnih organov glede na organizacije, ki zagotavljajo elektronska komunikacijska omrežja, opremo ali storitve, tudi objaviti naloge, ki jih morajo opraviti nacionalni regulativni organi, v preprosto dostopni obliki in uradno obvestiti Komisijo o imenu regulativnih organov, ki so za te funkcije zadolženi, ter o njihovih nalogah.
As a consequence, where those functions are to be discharged, even partially, by ministerial authorities, each Member State must ensure that those authorities are neither directly nor indirectly involved in ‘operational functions’ within the meaning of the Framework Directive.
Če ta dodeljevanja vsaj delno spadajo v pristojnost organov ministrstva, mora vsaka država nadzorovati, da ti organi niso niti neposredno niti posredno vpleteni v „obratovalne funkcije“ v smislu okvirne direktive.