natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In such situations, an Article 27 check could not be ‘prior’ in the strict sense of the word, but must be dealt with on an ex post basis.
V takih primerih preverjanje iz člena 27 v ožjem pomenu besede ne more veljati za „predhodno“, temveč ga je treba obravnavati kot „naknadno“.
With this pragmatic approach, the EDPS makes sure that Article 50 of the regulation is complied with in the area of processing operations that present specific risks.
S tem pragmatičnim pristopom ENVP zagotavlja, da se pri postopkih obdelave, ki so posebej tvegani, upošteva člen 50 Uredbe.
In order to deal with the backlog of cases likely to be subject to prior checking, the EDPS requested the DPOs to analyse the situation of their institution concerning processing operations within the scope of Article 27.
ENVP je zaradi zaostankov pri primerih, ki jih bo verjetno treba predhodno preveriti, uradne osebe za varstvo podatkov zaprosil, naj v svojih institucijah analizirajo razmere v zvezi s postopki obdelave v okviru člena 27.
Following the receipt of contributions from all DPOs, a list of cases subject to prior checking was made and subsequently refined. ned.
Po prejemu prispevkov vseh uradnih oseb za varstvo podatkov je bil sestavljen seznam primerov za predhodno preverjanje, ki je bil kasneje še izpopolnjen.
e legal analysis starts with an examination of whether the case actually qualifies for prior checking.
Pravna analiza se začne s preučitvijo, ali je treba primer dejansko predhodno preveriti.
As mentioned above, if the case does not fall within the scope of the cases listed in Article 27(2), the EDPS will assess the specific risk to rights and freedoms of the data subject.
Kot že omenjeno bo ENVP v primeru, ki ne sodi med navedene v členu 27(2), ocenil, kakšna so določena tveganja za pravice in svoboščine posameznikov, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki.
Once the case qualifies for prior checking, the core of the legal analysis is an examination of whether the processing operation complies with the relevant provisions of the regulation.
Potem ko je ugotovljeno, da primer ustreza merilom za predhodno preverjanje, se v pravni analizi preveri usklajenost postopka obdelave z zadevnimi določbami Uredbe.
Where necessary, recommendations are made to the effect of ensuring compliance with the regulation.
Po potrebi se zaradi zagotavljanja skladnosti z Uredbo izdajo priporočila.
In the conclusion, the EDPS has so far normally stated that the processing does not seem to involve a breach of any provision of the regulation, provided that the recommendations issued are taken into account.
V zaključnem delu je ENVP doslej običajno vedno izjavil, da kaže, da pri obdelavi ni prišlo do kršitve posameznih določb Uredbe, pod pogojem, da se upoštevajo izdana priporočila.
In two opinions issued in 2006 (2006-301 and 2006-142), the conclusions were different: the processing operations were in breach of the regulation and some recommendations had to be implemented to bring them into compliance.
V dveh mnenjih, ki sta bili objavljeni leta 2006 (2006-301 in 2006-142), pa so bili sklepi drugačni; pri postopkih obdelave je prišlo do kršitev Uredbe, zato je bilo treba zaradi uskladitve izvesti nekaj priporočil.
A case manual has been drafted to guarantee, as in other areas, that the entire team works on the same basis and that the EDPS’s opinions are adopted after a complete analysis of all significant information.
Opravljeni pregled je v večini institucij in organov omogočil opredelitev nekaterih kategorij, primernih za bolj sistematičen nadzor.
As a result of the inventory, some categories were iden-tifi ed in most institutions and bodies and therefore found suitable for a more systematic supervision.
Oblikovan je bil priročnik, s katerim naj bi tako kot na drugih področjih dela zagotovili, da celotna ekipa izhaja iz enake osnove in da ENVP mnenje sprejme po tem, ko je analiziral vse pomembne informacije.
A workflow system is in place to make sure that all recommendations in a particular case are followed up and, where applicable, that all enforcement decisions are complied with (see paragraph 2.3.7.) ese prioritisation criteria apply only to ex post cases, as proper prior checking cases must be dealt with before the processing operation is implemented, following the plans of the institution or body.
V priročniku je določeno, kako naj bo mnenje sestavljeno, temelji pa na pridobljenih praktičnih izkušnjah in se neprestano dopolnjuje.
Opinions on prior checking cases issued in 2006
Mnenja o primerih predhodnega preverjanja iz leta 2006
13 prior checking cases (12 opinions)
preverjanja (12 mnenj)12 primerov predhodnega
Commission Central Bank
Komisija preverjanja5 primerov predhodnega
12 prior checking cases5 prior checking cases
Investicijska banka preverjanja4 primeri predhodnega
(4 opinions)5 prior checking cases5 prior checking cases4 prior checking cases
6 preverjanja (3 mnenja)3 primeri predhodnega
In addition to these 57 prior checking cases on which an opinion has been issued, the EDPS has also dealt with nine cases which were found not to be subject to prior checking: five notifications came from the Commission, one from the Economic and Social Committee (ECSC) and Committee of the Regions (CoR) (which share some infrastructures), one from the EUMC and two from the Parliament — all of them on various matters such as, for example, the Internal Auditing Service (IAS), e-voting or internal audit service (Commission), user account management, standards for the use of IT systems and services (EUMC) and streamline (Parliament).
Poleg navedenih 57 primerov predhodnega preverjanja, o katerih je objavil mnenje, je ENVP obravnaval tudi 9 primerov, ki jih ni bilo treba predhodno preverjati: 5 uradnih obvestil iz Komisije, 1 iz Ekonomskosocialnega odbora in Odbora regij (uporabljata isto infrastrukturo), 1 iz EUMC in 2 iz Parlamenta, pri vseh pa je šlo za različne teme, kot so na primer služba za notranjo revizijo, elektronsko glasovanje oziroma služba za notranjo revizijo (Komisija), upravljanje uporabniških računov, standardi za uporabo sistemov in storitev IT (EUMC) in racionalizacija (Parlament).
See also paragraph 2.3.6.
Glej tudi odstavek 2.3.6.
Analysis by institution/body
preverjanja2 primera predhodnega
Court of Auditors Committee of Regions Economic and Social
Analiza glede na institucije/organe preverjanja1 primer predhodnega
Most institutions and bodies have notified processing operations likely to present specific risks. e EDPS has fixed a deadline, spring 2007, to complete all noti-
Večina institucij in organov je ENVP uradno obvestila o postopkih obdelave, ki verjetno predstavljajo določena tveganja. Ta je v zvezi z uradnimi obvestili o naknadnih predhodnih preverjanjih določil dokončni rok – pomlad 2007.
Committee f i fications of ex post prior checking.
9 preverjanja1 primer predhodnega
Out of the 57 prior checking cases (54 opinions), only five were proper prior checking cases, i.e. the institutions concerned (Court of Auditors for one of them, Commission for three and Parliament for the f i fifth) followed the procedure involved for prior check-
) ENVP je prejel 57 uradnih obvestil, vendar jih je od tega 6 (2 iz ECB, 2 iz Sveta in 2 iz Parlamenta) obravnaval skupaj, in sicer iz praktičnih razlogov, saj so bili v nekaterih primeri nameni isti. Zato je bilo prejetih
Agencies deserve a specific comment.
Agencije je treba obravnavati posebej.
In 2005, only one agency (OHIM) notified some cases. e EDPS had assumed that many other agencies would notify processing operations in the near future, but this has not been the case.
Leta 2005 je samo ena agencija (OHIM) poslala uradna obvestila o nekaterih primerih.
Some other agencies have started to notify processing operations; the related opinions will be issued in 2007 (see below ‘Notifications for prior checking received before 1 January 2007 and pending’).
ENVP je predvideval, da bodo v bližnji prihodnosti uradna obvestila o postopkih obdelave pošiljale tudi druge agencije, do česar pa ni prišlo.
ing before implementing the processing operation. Two of those five prior checking cases were related to evaluation, one to emonitoring and two to other themes such as the sharing of a database online among European delegations in China or the independence of financial actors. e remaining 52 cases were ex post prior checking cases.
Uradna obvestila o postopkih obdelave sta poslali samo dve drugi agenciji, EUMC in Prevajalski center; slednji je poslal dve obvestili v zvezi z ocenjevanjem, eno pa se je nanašalo na odsotnost z dela zaradi bolezni.
Commission).(8) European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia.(9) Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market.(10) European Anti-Fraud Office. ce.
57 uradnih obvestil in objavljenih 54 mnenj.(6)Prevajalski center za organe Evropske unije.(7) Evropski urad za izbor osebja (zanj je pristojen DPO Komisije).(8)Evropski center za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije.(9)Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu.(10)Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam.
Analysis by category e number of prior checking cases dealt with, by category of priority, is as follows: egory have already been received from the Parliament and the Court of Justice but the EDPS opinions will be issued in 2007.
(o zaposlovanju uradnikov, začasnih uslužbencev in pogodbenega osebja), ki se nanašajo na sistem zaposlovanja, določen za vse institucije EU.
Other notifications are of course expected.
Vse ustanovljene pred kratkim, kot sta npr.
Category one (medical fi les)14 prior checking cases Category two (staff appraisal)23 prior checking cases
Prva kategorija (zdravstvene 14 primerov predhodnega preverjanja23 primerov predhodnega preverjanja kartoteke)Druga kategorija (ocena osebja)
4 prior checking cases
Tretja kategorija (disciplinski 4 primeri predhodnega
Category three (disciplinary procedures)
preverjanja2 primera predhodnega preverjanja postopki)Četrta kategorija (storitve socialnega varstva)
Category four (social services)2 prior checking cases Category five (e-monitoring)5 prior checking cases Other areas9 prior checking cases e fifth category (e-monitoring) has been a major aspect of the EDPS work in 2006.
Peta kategorija (elektronsko 5 primerov predhodnega spremljanje) preverjanja Druga področja9 primerov predhodnega preverjanja
A paper is about to be published, after a complex survey among institutions and bodies and a special seminar devoted to the matter.
V zvezi s tem je bila med institucijami in organi izvedena kompleksna raziskava, organiziran je bil tudi poseben seminar, sedaj pa je v pripravi tudi dokument na to temo.
Meanwhile, only proper prior checks were carried out.
V tem času se je izvajalo samo pravo predhodno preverjanje.
Already five files were notified by the institutions (Commission (2), ECB, EIB and Council).
Institucije so poslale uradna obvestila že o petih primerih (Komisija (2), ECB, EIB in Svet).
And many others are already scheduled for 2007.
Za leto 2007 pa jih je v pripravi še cela vrsta.
Category one includes the medical file itself and its different contents (11 prior checking cases) and all procedures linked to allowances or sickness schemes (three prior checking cases). is priority is nearly stable in percentage (26.5 % of cases in 2005, 24.6 % of cases in 2006) but the number of cases has increased significantly, showing that the institutions and bodies are aware of the need of a prior check.
Prva kategorija vključuje zdravstveno kartoteko in njene posamezne elemente (11 primerov predhodnega preverjanja) ter vse postopke v zvezi z dodatki oziroma zdravstvenim zavarovanjem (3 primeri predhodnega preverjanja). Ta prednostna kategorija je, gledano v odstotkih (26,5 % primerov leta 2005, 24,6 % leta 2006), skoraj nespremenjena, vidno pa se je povečalo število primerov, kar pomeni, da se institucije in organi zavedajo, kako pomembno je predhodno preverjanje.
Regarding the notifications of ex post cases which do not belong to those priority categories, they could be divided in two groups.
Uradna obvestila o naknadnih primerih, ki ne sodijo v okvir teh prednostnih kategorij, bi lahko razdelili v dve skupini.
Some are related to financial matters such as PIF (Financial Irregularities Panel, Commission), the Early Warning System (Commission and Court of Justice), call for tenders (Committee of Regions), procurement procedure (Court of Justice) and independence of financial actors (Parliament). e others are various, relating to the EU–China Tourism Agreement (Commission), to the participation in a strike (Commission), or to internal investigations (OLAF). ese various notifications have been an opportunity for the EDPS to set up criteria in very sensitive areas, such as the Early Warning System and the internal investigations of OLAF (see paragraph 2.3.4).
Nekatera se nanašajo na finančne zadeve, kot so komisija za finančne nepravilnosti (Komisija), sistem zgodnjega opozarjanja (Komisija in Sodišče), javni razpisi (Odbor regij), postopek za oddajo javnih naročil (Sodišče) in neodvisnost finančnih akterjev (Par-lament).
It should be added that those 23 files include the three major noti- f i fications of EPSO (respectively relating to recruitment of officials, of temporary agents and contractual agents) which deal with the recruitment system set up for all the EU institutions.
V drugo skupino pa spadajo različna obvestila, od sporazuma o turizmu med EU in Kitajsko (Komisija) do sodelovanja v stavkah (Komisija) oziroma notranjih preiskav (OLAF).
Regarding the third category (disciplinary procedures), e two charts in Annex E illustrate the work of the EDPS and of the institutions and bodies. ey detail the number of working days of the EDPS, the number of extension days required by the EDPS and the number of suspension days (time needed to receive information from the institutions and bodies).
ENVP so ta različna uradna obvestila omogočila oblikovanje meril na zelo občutljivih področjih, kot sta sistem zgodnjega opozarjanja in notranje preiskave s strani OLAF (glej odstavek 2.3.4).
14 only four files were sent, by the ECB (13
Delo ENVP ter institucij in organov
) and the Council. e ‘major institutions’ have all ful- f i filled their obligation regarding this category, except the EESC and the CoR.
Najpomembnejša še naprej ostaja druga kategorija, ki se nanaša na ocenjevanje osebja (23 primerov od skupno 57), kljub temu, da se njen odstotni delež zmanjšuje (56 % primerov v letu 2005, 40,4 % leta 2006).
Some agencies such as OHIM and EMCDDA have announced the sending of those notifications. cations.
Ocenjevanje zajema vse zaposlene Evropske skupnosti, kar pomeni uradnike, začasne uslužbence ter pogodbene uradnike, in postopke zaposlovanja.
Number of working days of the EDPS per prior check: this represents an increase of only 4.4 %, or 2.5 days more of work than in 2005 (55.5 days in 2005 and 57.9 in 2006). is remains a satisfactory figure considering the increasing complexity of the notifications sent to the EDPS.
Uradna obvestila so bila podana tako o postopkih izbire in ocenjevanja kot o certifikacijskih in potrditvenih postopkih.
Number of extension days for the EDPS: this represents an increase of 62.6 % but in absolute terms only two days more than in 2005 (3.3 days in 2005 and 5.4 days in 2006).
Grafa v Prilogi E prikazujeta delo ENVP ter institucij in organov.
It is due mainly to the complexity of
V njiju je podrobno prikazano: število
13) European Central Bank.14) European Court of Justice.
(13)Evropska centralna banka.(14)Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti.
(‘incompetence’, notification of the Court of Auditors, opinion already issued on 18 January 2007).
V okviru teh je bilo eno uradno obvestilo poslano leta 2005, 25 pa leta 2006 (9 v decembru), medtem ko jih je bilo januarja 2007 poslanih 11.
three specific files: the file on internal investigations of OLAF, the file on the Early Warning System of the Commission (with important changes during the period during which the EDPS was preparing his opinion) and the file on recruitment of contractual agents by EPSO (with a major new database being set up too during EDPS’ work).
Razloge gre iskati predvsem v kompleksnosti treh posebnih primerov: notranje preiskave s strani OLAF, zgodnjega sistema opozarjanja Komisije (v času, ko je ENVP pripravljal mnenje, je prišlo do pomembnih sprememb) ter zaposlovanja pogodbenih uradnikov s strani EPSO (medtem, ko primer obravnava ENVP, je v teku vzpostavitev obsežne nove zbirke podatkov).
In the two first cases, a special meeting with the controller and the DPO was needed.
Evropsko ekonomsko-socialni 2 primera predhodnega odbor in Odbor regijpreverjanja
In fact, the EDPS unfortunately has to underline that three files were suspended for the very long periods of 236, 258 and 276 days respectively.
ENVP obžaluje, da je prišlo do takšnih zamud, čeprav so bile morda posledica določenih razmer. Institucije in organi bi si morali prizadevati za skrajšanje rokov za posredovanje informacij.
e EDPS welcomes that four agencies (CdT, ETF, EFSA and CPVO) have started to send their notifi ca-tions and encourages the other agencies and bodies to do the same. e specific case of OLAF is underlined below.
ENVP pozitivno ocenjuje dejstvo, da so štiri agencije (CdT, ETF, EFSA in CPVO) že začele pošiljati uradna obvestila, druge agencije in organe pa poziva, naj storijo enako. Več o posebnem primeru OLAFv nadaljevanju.
Even if some circumstances may explain that kind of delay, the EDPS regrets these figures.
ENVP želi poudariti, da se je v Komisiji in na Sodišču število dni začasnega odloga zmanjšalo (za 39,3 % oziroma 45,2 %).
Institutions and bodies should make an effort to reduce the time needed to send the information.
Temu zgledu naj bi sledile tudi druge institucije.
In any case, the EDPS once again reminds the institutions and bodies of their obligation to cooperate with the EDPS and to provide him with the requested information, according to Article 30 of the regulation.
Število primerov predhodnega preverjanja, o katerih je bil ENVP obveščen, je mogoče glede na prednostne kategorije razčleniti takole:
Category one (medical fi les)4 prior checking cases Category two (staff appraisal)8 prior checking cases none
Prva kategorija (zdravstvene kartoteke)
Category three (disciplinary procedures)
8 primerov predhodnega preverjanja
Category four (social services)2 prior checking cases Category five (e-monitoring)6 prior checking cases Other area6 prior checking
Druga kategorija (ocena osebja) nobenega primera
Hopefully, the other institutions and bodies will follow this direction.
ECB in EIB pa sta poslali uradna obvestila o drugih postopkih obdelave v okviru te kategorije.
18 cases (
Druga področja
In category one, there has been a continuing process of notifications. Among them, the EDPS received (from three institutions), the notification of medical f i les stricto sensu, that is, files held by medical services.
V kategorijo drugih področij spada predvsem OLAF, ki pošilja veliko uradnih obvestil o primerih predhodnega preverjanja, saj gre pri teh za posebno občutljivo tematiko.
is is expected to continue in 2007, as many procedures involve medical files. e EDPS welcomes that
Ta uradna obvestila so prvi rezultat skupne analize in načrtovanja uradne osebe za varstvo podatkov OLAF ter ekipe ENVP, s čimer naj bi omogočili nemoteno delo.
By the end of 2006, 26 prior checking cases were already in process.
Uradnih obvestil bo vedno več.
Of these, one notification was sent in 2005 and 25 notifications in 2006 (nine in December), and 11 were notified in January 2007.
OLAF je januarja 2007 že poslal uradna obvestila o 7 primerih predhodnega preverjanja, še 20 pa se jih pričakuje pred 1. marcem 2007.
Annual Report 2006 notifications in this area are being received from the
Glavne ugotovitve v zvezi s primeri naknadnega preverjanja
) should follow; as it has already been seen (see 2.4.2).
Temu zgledu bi moral slediti tudi PMO( saj ga je ENVP na to že opomnil (glej 2.4.2).
Medical data and other health-related data are processed by the institutions and bodies.
Zdravstvene podatke in druge podatke, povezane z zdravstvenim stanjem, obdelujejo institucije in organi.
Any data relating to direct or indirect knowledge of the state of health of an individual fall under this category. erefore, sick leaves and sickness insurance claims are subject to prior checking.
V to kategorijo spadajo vsi podatki v zvezi z neposrednimi ali posrednimi informacijami o zdravstvenem stanju posameznika. Zahtevke za odsotnost z dela zaradi bolezni in v zvezi z zdravstvenim zavarovanjem je torej treba predhodno preveriti.
e second category theme (staff appraisal) still represents the majority of cases — eight out of 26 files (30.8 %).
Večino primerov še vedno predstavljajo tisti iz druge kategorije (ocena osebja), tj. 8 primerov od 26(30,8 %).
Major cases have been notified within this area (EPSO cases, see above) which concern all institutions and bodies, but the EDPS would like to underline that some institutions have not notified their own procedures about the use of the reserve lists of EPSO.
V okviru tega področja je ENVP prejel uradna obvestila o obsežnih primerih (glej zgoraj – primeri EPSO), ki zadevajo vse institucije in organe; poudariti pa želi, da ga nekatere institucije niso uradno obvestile o svojih postopkih glede uporabe rezervnih seznamov agencije EPSO.
Regarding the third category (disciplinary procedures), the EDPS is expecting notifications from the institutions, especially from agencies and the two committees.
Glede tretje kategorije (disciplinski postopki) ENVP iz institucij pričakuje uradna obvestila, zlasti iz agencij in obeh odborov.
With all of the prior checking cases (Council, ECB and EIB), and also the pending ones on the same subject (Parliament, EESC and COR), the EPDS has a good overview.
V okviru četrte kategorije (storitve socialnega varstva) sta 2 uradni obvestili že prispeli (eno iz Parlamenta, drugo pa s Sodišča).
Concerning category four (social services), two noti-fi fications have already been received (one from the Parliament and one from the Court of Justice).
ENVP je, kot že omenjeno, nadzoroval 11 primerov predhodnega preverjanja, ki so bili neposredno povezani z zdravstveno kartoteko oziroma različnimi elementi kartoteke.
Category five (e-monitoring) is still of particular importance.
Svet je v predhodno preverjanje poslal zdravstveno kartoteko samo.
As mentioned above, the paper on emonitoring is being used as background for the prior checking of emonitoring systems and serves as reference for prior checking in this domain (see paragraph 2.7).
ENVP je zlasti glede kakovosti podatkov, njihovi hrambi ter o informacijah, ki se posredujejo posamezniku, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, podal številna priporočila.
Many institutions and bodies are concerned in this area where six opinions have been issued: the Commission, the ECB (two), the EIB (two) and the Council. e EESC and COR notified that kind of procedures. e ECB and the EIB notified other processing operations in that category.
Nad vsemi primeri predhodnega preverjanja (Svet, ECB in EIB) ter primeri na isto temo, ki so še nerešeni (Parlament, Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor in Odbor regij), ima ENVP dober pregled.
Staff evaluation is a common processing operation in all institutions and bodies for obvious reasons.
Peta kategorija (elektronsko spremljanje) je še vedno zelo pomembna.
( medical files). files).
EPSO ima na tem področju veliko vlogo.
Another important prior checking case was the EU-CV online (not to be mistaken with Sysper 2 e-CV; see below for main issues of proper prior checks), which replaces the current manual or semi-manual handling of spontaneous applications for Commission vacancies with a harmonised electronic system and for which the EDPS made some recommendations regarding storage periods, use of backup data and consent of the reference persons included in the CV.
) Nanašajo se na javne razpise (Komisija) in 5 uradnih obvestil s strani OLAF o upravnem, finančnem, sodnem in disciplinskem nadaljnjem ukrepanju ter o spremljanju primerov.) Ta ima namreč v zvezi s posebnimi vidiki (npr. arhiviranjem zdravstvenih kartotek) medinstitucionalno vlogo.)Urad za vodenje in plačevanje posameznih pravic.