natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If, on the other hand, at the end of the said period, the invalidity pension is refused, in which case the benefit at issue must be changed, in regard both to its amount and to its duration, to the entitlement to unemployment benefit, the competent author -ities of that Member State are no longer required to pay the latter benefit to the re -cipient unless he can show that that he fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 69 of Regulation No 1408/71 for the retention of the right to benefits as a worker seeking employment in another Member State, which implies that he must fulfil all the conditions laid down in the national law of the Member State of origin for entitlement to unemployment benefit.
Nasprotno pa, če je invalidska pokojnina po izteku tega čakalnega obdobja zavrnjena, zaradi česar je treba zadevni prejemek glede zneska in trajanja vračunati v nadomestilo za brezposelnost, pristojnim organom navedene države članice ne bo treba več izplačevati teh nadomestil navedenemu upravičencu, razen če ta dokaže, da je izpolnil pogoje iz člena 69 Uredbe �t. 1408/71, da bi bil upravičen ohraniti ugodnost kot delavec, ki i�če zaposlitev v drugi državi članici, kar pomeni, da mora izpolniti vse pogoje, ki jih določa nacionalno pravo države članice izvora, da bi bil upravičen do prejemkov za brezposelnost.
In any event, even if such checks were provided for, it would still have to be ascertained whether it was not sufficient to request that the recipient go to the Member State concerned for the purpose of undergoing such checks, if necessary, on pain of suspension of payment of the benefit in the event of unwarranted refusal on the part of the recipient (see, to that effect, Case C-499/06 Nerkowska [2008] ECR I-3993, paragraph 45).
V vsakem primeru, čeprav bi bil tak nadzor določen, bi se moralo vendarle preveriti, ali ne zadostuje upravičenca pozvati, da pride v zadevno državo članico, zaradi izvedbe tega nadzora, če je to potrebno tudi z grožnjo odložitve izplačila navedenega prejemka v primeru neupravičene zavrnitve s strani navedenega upravičenca (glej v tem smislu sodbo z dne 22. maja 2008 v zadevi Nerkowska, C-499/06, ZOdl., str. I-3993, točka 45).
It follows from the foregoing that, with regard to the grant of a benefit such as the one at issue in the main proceedings and inasmuch as the file submitted to the Court does not contain any factor which might objectively justify a residence requirement, that requirement must be regarded as incompatible with Article 39 EC.
Iz navedenega izhaja, da je treba prejemek, kadar gre za prejemek, kot je ta, ki je obravnavan v postopku v glavni stvari, če spis, predložen Sodi�ču, ne vsebuje nobenega elementa, ki bi objektivno upravičil pogoj prebivali�ča, �teti za nezdružljivega s členom 39 ES.
Consequently, the answer to the second question must be that, inasmuch as no factor has been put forward which shows that such a condition is objectively justified and proportionate, Article 39 EC must be interpreted as preventing a Member State from making the grant of a benefit such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, which must be regarded as an ‘unemployment benefit’ within the meaning of Article 4(1)(g) of Regulation No 1408/71, subject to the condition that the recipients be resident in the national territory of that State.
Tako je treba na drugo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je treba člen 39 ES razlagati tako, da nasprotuje temu, da država članica za dodelitev prejemka, kot je ta, ki je obravnavan v postopku v glavni stvari, ki ga je treba �teti kot „dajatev za brezposelnost [prejemek za brezposelnost]“ v smislu člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe �t. 1408/71, določi pogoj, da imajo upravičenci prebivali�če na nacionalnem ozemlju te države, če ne predloži nobenega elementa, ki bi lahko dokazal, da je ta pogoj objektivno utemeljen in sorazmeren.
A benefit such as the one at issue in the main proceedings must be regarded as an ‘unemployment benefit’ within the meaning of Article 4(1)(g) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to selfemployed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996;
Prejemek, kot je ta, ki je obravnavan v postopku v glavni stvari, je treba šteti kot „dajatev za brezposelnost [prejemek za brezposelnost]“ v smislu člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe št. 1408/71 z dne 14. junija 1971 o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe, samozaposlene osebe in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti, kot je bila spremenjena in posodobljena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 118/97 z dne 2. decembra 1996.
Inasmuch as no factor has been put forward which shows that such a condition is objectively justified and proportionate, Article 39 EC must be interpreted as preventing a Member State from making the grant of a benefit such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, which must be regarded as an ‘unemployment benefit’ within the meaning of Article 4(1)(g) of Regulation No 1408/71, subject to the condition that the recipients be resident in the national territory of that State.
Člen 39 ES je treba razlagati tako, da nasprotuje temu, da država članica za dodelitev prejemka, kot je ta, ki je obravnavan v postopku v glavni stvari, ki ga je treba šteti kot „dajatev za brezposelnost [prejemek za brezposelnost]“ v smislu člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe št. 1408/71, določi pogoj, da imajo upravičenci prebivališče na nacionalnem ozemlju te države, če ne predloži nobenega elementa, ki bi lahko dokazal, da je ta pogoj objektivno utemeljen in sorazmeren.
Case C-251/07
Zadeva C-251/07
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen)
(Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Högsta domstolen)
(Environment — Directive 2000/76/EC — Incineration of waste — Classification of an installation for the production of heat and electricity — Concepts of incineration plant and co-incineration plant)
„Okolje – Direktiva 2000/76/ES – Sežiganje odpadkov – Opredelitev obrata za soproizvodnjo toplote in elektrike – Pojma ‚sežigalnica‘ in ‚naprava za sosežig‘“
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 11 September 2008 . . . . . . . .
Kokott, predstavljeni 22. maja 2008 Sodba Sodi�ča (četrti senat) z dne 11. septembra 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Environment — Waste — Incineration — Directive 2000/76 (European Parliament and Council Directive 2000/76, Art. 3(4) and (5))
Okolje – Odpadki – Sežiganje – Direktiva 2000/76 (Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/76, člen 3, točki 4 in 5)
SUMMARY — CASE C-251/07
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-251/07
For the purposes of applying Direct- ive 2000/76 on the incineration of waste, where a co-generation plant comprises a number of boilers, each boiler and its associated equipment is to be regarded as constituting a separate plant.
Pri uporabi Direktive 2000/76 o sežiganju odpadkov je treba, ko ima toplarna več kotlov, vsak kotel in pripadajočo opremo obravnavati kot ločeno napravo.
authorities to identify that purpose on the basis of an assessment of the facts existing at the time at which that assessment is carried out.
dejstev, ki obstajajo v času te presoje.
In the context of such an assessment, account must be taken, in particular, of the volume of energy generated or material products produced by the plant in question in relation to the quantity of waste incinerated in that plant and the stability and continuity of that production.
V okviru take presoje je treba upo�tevati zlasti z zadevno napravo proizvedeno količino energije ali izdelkov glede na količino sežganih odpadkov v tej napravi ter stabilnost in nepretrganost te proizvodnje.
It is on the basis of its main purpose that a plant is to be classified as an ‘incineration plant’ or a ‘co-incineration plant’ within the meaning of Article 3(4) and (5) of Directive 2000/76 on the incineration of waste.
Naprava se mora glede na svoj glavni namen opredeliti kot „sežigalnica“ ali „naprava za sosežig“ v smislu člena 3, točki 4 in 5, Direktive 2000/76 o sežiganju odpadkov.
(see para. 46, operative part 2)
(Glej točko 46 in točko 2 izreka.)
Article 1 of the Waste Incineration Direct- ive sets out its objectives, as follows:
Člen 1 Direktive o sežiganju odpadkov določa njene cilje:
‘The aim of this Directive is to prevent or to limit as far as practicable negative effects on the environment, in particular pollution by emissions into air, soil, surface water and groundwater, and the resulting risks to human health, from the incineration and co-incineration of waste.
„Cilj te direktive je pri sežiganju in sosežiganju odpadkov preprečiti ali omejiti negativne učinke na okolje, zlasti onesnaževanje z emisijami v zrak, tla, povr�insko vodo in podzemno vodo, kolikor je to izvedljivo, ter iz tega izvirajoče tveganje za zdravje ljudi.
This case concerns the interpretation of Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste 2(‘the Waste Incineration Directive’).
Obravnavana zadeva se nana�a na razlago Direktive 2000/76/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2000 o sežiganju odpadkov 2(v nadaljevanju: Direktiva o sežiganju odpadkov).
More precisely, it is necessary to establish whether a plant for the production of heat and electricity (‘co-gener-ation plant’) 3falls to be considered as a whole or whether each boiler must be taken into account separately and new incineration plants are to be distinguished from co-incin-eration plants.
Podrobno je treba razjasniti, ali je napravo za proizvodnjo toplote in elektrike (v nadaljevanju: naprava za proizvodnjo toplote in elektrike 3) treba obravnavati kot celoto ali se mora upo�tevati posamezne kotle, in kako razlikovati med sežigalnico in napravo za sosežig.
3 — See the definition in Article 3 of Directive 2004/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on the promotion of co-generation based on a useful heat demand in the internal energy market and amending Dir -ective 92/42/EEC (OJ 2004 L 52, p. 50).
3 – Glej opredelitev iz člena 3 Direktive 2004/8/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. februarja 2004 o spodbujanju soproizvodnje, ki temelji na rabi koristne toplote, na notranjem trgu z energijo in o spremembi Direktive 92/42/EGS (UL L 52, str. 50).
This aim shall be met by means of stringent operational conditions and technical requirements, through setting emission limit values for waste incineration and co-incin-eration plants within the Community and
Ta cilj se doseže s strogimi pogoji obratovanja in tehničnimi zahtevami, z določitvijo mejnih vrednosti emisij za sežigalnice in naprave za
This definition covers the site and the entire incineration plant including all incineration lines, waste reception, storage, on-site pretreatment facilities, [waste-, fuel- and air-supply systems], boiler, facilities for the treatment of exhaust gases, on-site facilities for treatment or storage of residues and waste water, stack, devices and systems for controlling incineration operations, recording and monitoring incineration conditions;
Ta opredelitev vključuje kraj in celotno napravo za sežiganje, vključno z vsemi linijami za sežiganje, sprejemom odpadkov, skladi�čem, napravami za predobdelavo na kraju samem, sistemi za oskrbo z odpadki-gorivom in zrakom, kotlom, napravami za či�čenje odpadnih plinov, napravami za obdelavo ali skladi�čenje ostankov in odpadne vode na kraju samem, odvodnikom, napravami in sistemi za nadziranje postopkov sežiganja, zapisovanje in spremljanje pogojev sežiganja;
“co-incineration plant” means any stationary or mobile plant whose main purpose is the generation of energy or production of material products and:
‚naprava za sosežig‘ katero koli nepremično ali premično napravo, katere glavni namen je proizvodnja energije ali izdelkov in:
— which uses wastes as a regular or additional fuel; or
– ki uporablja odpadke kot običajno ali dodatno gorivo; ali
— in which waste is thermally treated for the purpose of disposal.
– v kateri se odpadki termično obdelajo z namenom odstranitve.
“incineration plant” means any stationary or mobile technical unit and equipment dedicated to the thermal treatment of wastes with or without recovery of the combustion heat generated.
„sežigalnica“ katero koli nepremično ali premično tehnično enoto in opremo, namenjeno toplotni obdelavi odpadkov z izkori�čanjem pridobljene zgorevalne toplote ali brez njega.
This includes the incineration by oxidation of waste as well as other thermal treatment processes such as pyrolysis, gasification or plasma processes in so far as the substances resulting from the treatment are subsequently incinerated.
To vključuje sežig z oksidacijo odpadkov in druge postopke toplotne obdelave, kot so piroliza, uplin -janje ali obdelava v plazmi, če se snovi, ki nastanejo pri obdelavi, naknadno sežgejo.
If co-incineration takes place in such a way that the main purpose of the plant is not the generation of energy or production of material products but rather the thermal treatment of waste, the plant shall be regarded as an incineration plant within the meaning of point 4.
Če sosežiganje poteka tako, da glavni namen naprave ni proizvodnja energije ali izdelkov, ampak toplotna obdelava odpadkov, se naprava �teje za sežigalnico v smislu točke 4.
Incineration plants shall be operated in order to achieve a level of incineration such that the slag and bottom ashes total organic carbon (TOC) content is less than 3% or their loss on ignition is less than 5% of the dry weight of the material.
Sežigalnice obratujejo tako, da se doseže stopnja sežiga, pri kateri je delež skupnega organskega ogljika (TOC) v žlindri in pepelu manj kot 3 % ali je žarilna izguba manj kot 5 % suhe teže materiala.
If necessary appropriate techniques of waste pretreatment shall be used.
Če je potrebno, se uporabijo ustrezne metode predobdelave odpadkov.
Incineration plants shall be designed, equipped, built and operated in such a way that the gas resulting from the process is raised, after the last injection of combustion air, in a controlled and homogeneous fashion and even under the most unfavourable conditions, to a temperature of 850°C, as measured near the inner wall or at another representative point of the combustion chamber as authorised by the competent authority, for two seconds.
Sežigalnice se projektirajo, opremijo, zgradijo in upravljajo tako, da se po zadnjem dovodu zraka za sežig plin, ki nastane pri postopku, na nadzorovan in homogen način ter tudi v najbolj neugodnih pogojih za dve sekundi segreje na temperaturo 850 °C, merjeno blizu notranje stene ali na drugi reprezentativni točki sežigalne komore, kot to odobri pristojni organ.
If hazardous wastes with a content of more than 1% of halogenated organic substances, expressed as chlorine, are incinerated, the temperature has to be raised to 1 100°C for at least two seconds.
Če se sežigajo nevarni odpadki, ki vsebujejo več kot 1 % halogeniranih organskih snovi, izraženih kot klor, je treba temperaturo za vsaj dve sekundi dvigniti na 1 100 °C.
Each line of the incineration plant shall be equipped with at least one auxiliary burner.
Vsaka linija sežigalnice mora biti oprem -ljena z vsaj enim pomožnim gorilnikom.
This burner must be switched on automatically when the temperature of the combus -tion gases after the last injection of combustion air falls below 850°C or 1 100°C as the case may be.
Ta gorilnik se mora samodejno vklopiti, kadar po zadnjem dovodu zraka za sežig temperatura zgorevalnih plinov pade pod 850 °C oziroma 1 100 °C.
It shall also be used during plant start-up and shut-down operations in order to ensure that the temperature of 850°C or 1 100°C as the case may be is maintained
Gorilnik se uporabi tudi ob zagonu in ustavitvi naprave, da se zagotovi, da se temperatura 850 °C oziroma 1 100 °C
which concerns the relationship of that directive with Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control: 4
Sveta 96/61/ES z dne 24. septembra 1996 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja 4:
During start-up and shut-down or when the temperature of the combustion gas falls below 850°C or 1 100°C as the case may be, the auxiliary burner shall not be fed with fuels which can cause higher emissions than those resulting from the burning of gasoil as defined in Article 1(1) of Council Dir -ective 75/716/EEC, liquefied gas or natural gas.
Med zagonom in ustavitvijo ali ko temperatura zgorevalnega plina pade pod 850 °C ali 1 100 °C, se pomožni gorilnik ne sme polniti z gorivi, ki lahko povzročijo vi�je emisije od tistih, nastalih pri sežigu plinskega olja, kot je opredeljeno v členu 1(1) Direktive Sveta 75/716/EGS, utekočinjenega plina ali zemeljskega plina.
‘Compliance with the emission limit values laid down by this Directive should be regarded as a necessary but not sufficient condition for compliance with the requirements of Directive 96/61/EC.
„Skladnost z mejnimi vrednostmi emisij, ki jih določa ta direktiva, je treba imeti za potreben, vendar ne zadosten pogoj za skladnost z zahtevami Direktive 96/61/ES.
Such compliance may involve more stringent emissions limit values for the pollutants envisaged by this Directive, emission limit values for other substances and other media, and other appropriate conditions.’
Taka skladnost lahko vključuje strožje mejne vrednosti emisij za onesnaževala, predvidena v tej direktivi, mejne vrednosti emisije za druge snovi in druge prvine okolja ter druge ustrezne pogoje.“
III — The dispute in the main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
III – Dejansko stanje in vprašanji za predhodno odločanje
Co-incineration plants shall be designed, equipped, built and operated in such a way that the gas resulting from the co-inciner-ation of waste is raised in a controlled and homogeneous fashion and even under the most unfavourable conditions, to a temperature of 850°C for two seconds.
Naprave za sosežig se projektirajo, opremijo, zgradijo in upravljajo tako, da se plin, ki nastane pri sosežiganju odpadkov, na nadzorovan in homogen način ter tudi v najbolj neugodnih pogojih za dve sekundi segreje na 850 °C.
If hazardous wastes with a content of more than 1% of halogenated organic substances, expressed as chlorine, are co-incinerated, the temperature has to be raised to 1 100°C.’
Če se sosežigajo nevarni odpadki, ki vsebujejo več kot 1% halogeniranih organskih snovi, izraženih kot klor, je treba temperaturo dvigniti na 1 100 °C.“
Gävle Kraftvärme AB is an undertaking within the Gävle Energi group of companies, which, in turn, is wholly owned by an undertaking owned by the municipality of Gävle.
Gävle Kraftvärme AB je družba iz skupine podjetij za energetiko Gävle; je odvisna družba, katere stoodstotna lastnica je delni�ka družba v lasti občine Gävle. Ena izmed njenih
Finally, reference should be made to recital 13 in the preamble to the directive,
Končno je treba opozoriti na 13. uvodno izjavo, ki se nana�a na razmerje do Direktive
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME district heating for Gävle’s district heating network.
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME nalog je tudi proizvajanje toplote za omrežje daljinskega ogrevanja mesta Gävle.
In that case, the undertaking may install a new, larger, biofuel boiler of a maximum of 85 MW which covers all future needs.
nov, večji kotel na biolo�ka goriva z močjo največ 85 MW, s katerim bi bilo pokrito vse povpra�evanje v prihodnosti.
Gävle Kraftvärme operates the Johannes co-generation plant.
Gävle Kraftvärme uporablja napravo za proizvodnjo toplote in elektrike tipa Johannes.
This is the undertaking’s own basic production plant in the district heating network and is used to produce heat and electricity.
Ta je v lasti družbe in služi kot osnovna naprava v proizvodnji toplote za omrežje daljinskega ogrevanja ter proizvaja hkrati toploto in električni tok.
The plant consists of a solid fuel boiler, Boiler No 1, which, after its present completion works, will have a total installed supplied capacity of 85 MW.
Naprava je sestavljena iz kotla na trdo gorivo oz. kotla 1, ki bo – potem ko bo njegova postavitev končana – imel skupno obratovalno vhodno moč v vi�ini 85 MW.
Heat is produced by incinerating primarily biofuel, including recycled wood, but trials including certain waste fuels are being carried out.
Proizvodnja toplote poteka s sežiganjem predvsem biolo�kih goriv, vključno z recikliranim lesom, poskusno pa tudi z dodajanjem določenih goriv iz odpadkov.
Gävle Kraftvärme therefore applied for a permit for operations at the Johannes co-generation plant for a total installed supplied capacity of a maximum of 170 MW.
Družba Gävle Kraftvärme je zato zaprosila za dovoljenje za obratovanje za napravo za proizvodnjo toplote in elektrike tipa Johannes s skupno obratovalno vhodno sežigalno močjo v vi�ini največ 170 MW.
The application was also for a permit to continue operating the present solid fuel boiler (Boiler No 1) with a total installed supplied capacity of 85 MW and to install and put into operation a new waste boiler (Boiler No 2) with a total installed supplied capacity of a maximum of 50 MW, on the one hand, and a new biofuel boiler (Boiler No 3) with a total installed supplied capacity of a maximum of 85 MW, on the other.
Pro�nja je zajemala tudi dovoljenje za nadaljnjo uporabo zdaj�njega kotla na trda goriva (kotel 1) s skupno obratovalno vhodno sežigalno močjo v vi�ini 85 MW in dovoljenje za postavitev in začetek obratovanja novega kotla na goriva iz odpadkov (kotel 2) s skupno obratovalno vhodno sežigalno močjo največ 50 MW in kotla na biolo�ko gorivo (kotel 3) s skupno obratovalno vhodno sežigalno močjo največ 85 MW.
The two new boilers’ combined supplied capacity was not, however, to exceed 85 MW.
Vendar naj bi skupna vhodna moč obeh novih kotlov ne presegala 85 MW.
The application was also for a permit to carry out any additional changes and for any additional plant necessary for the increased operations.
Pro�nja je zajemala tudi dovoljenje za izvedbo drugih sprememb in nastavitev, ki so potrebne za raz�irjeno delovanje.
Gävle Kraftvärme is now planning an extension of the co-generation plant to include a further one or two boilers of a combined maximum installed supplied capacity of 85 MW.
Gävle Kraftvärme zdaj načrtuje raz�iritev naprave za proizvodnjo toplote in elektrike z �e enim ali dvema kotloma z največjo skupno obratovalno vhodno močjo v vi�ini največ 85 MW.
The undertaking intends first to build a new waste boiler of a maximum of 50 MW, Boiler No 2, to incinerate household and commercial waste.
Družba namerava najprej zgraditi kotel na goriva iz odpadkov z močjo največ 50 MW oz. kotel 2, ki bo namenjen sežiganju gospodinjskih in gospodarskih odpadkov.
Thereafter, if the need arises, a new biofuel boiler, Boiler No 3, will be built with a supplied capacity which will meet future needs up to 85 MW.
Če to ne bo zadostilo povpra�evanju, bo zgrajen nov kotel na biolo�ka goriva oz. kotel 3 z vhodno močjo, ki naj bi krila povpra�evanje v prihodnosti do vi�ine 85 MW.
A maximum of 10 000 tonnes of that waste will consist of hazardous waste, in the form of surface-treated wood or wood treated with wood preservative.
goriva iz odpadkov letno. Delež nevarnih odpadkov pri tem bo največ 10.000 ton, in sicer kot les, ki je bil obdelan povr�insko ali z materiali za za�čito.
‘(1) Where a combined power and heating plant consists of a number of units (boilers), for the purposes of the interpretation of [the Waste Incineration Directive] …, is each unit to be assessed as a separate plant or is the assessment to cover the combined power and heating plant as a whole?
Ali se pri razlagi Direktive o sežiganju odpadkov, ko je naprava za proizvodnjo toplote in elektrike sestavljena iz več enot (kotlov), vsaka enota presoja kot ločena naprava, ali se naprava za proizvodnjo toplote in elektrike presoja kot celota?