natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The system introduced by Articles 66 and 67 of Regulation No 796/2004 does not therefore reflect a revised assessment by the Community legislature as to whether the penalty is commensurate with the gravity of the irregularity at issue.
Sistem, ki je bil uveden s členoma 66 in 67 Uredbe �t. 796/2004, zato ne izraža spremembe presoje zakonodajalca Skupnosti glede primernosti kazni v razmerju do resnosti zadevne nepravilnosti.
However, the fact remains that, following the CAP reform, compliance with those same rules now forms part of a fundamentally different regulatory context providing for a system that no longer supports production but the producer, in the form of a single payment which is subject to compliance with a series of standards in areas such as public and animal health, the environment and animal welfare.
Vendar je treba ugotoviti, da se zaradi reforme SKP in po njej spo�tovanje istih pravil uvr�ča v povsem drugačen pravni okvir, ki predvideva sistem podpore, vendar ne več proizvodnji, temveč proizvajalcu v obliki enotnega plačila, ki je odvisno od spo�tovanja �tevilnih predpisov s področij, kot so javno zdravje in zdravje živali, okolje in dobro počutje živali.
Those rules thus fall under an overall system whereby, in accordance with Article 3(1) of Regulation No 1782/2003, on the one hand, they apply to all recipients of direct payments as common rules applicable to all the aid schemes referred to by that regulation and, accordingly, extend beyond solely the aid schemes for bovine animals, and, on the other hand, constitute merely some of the standards to be complied with under cross-compliance.
Navedena pravila tako spadajo h globalnemu sistemu, v katerem v skladu s členom 3(1) Uredbe �t. 1782/2003 na eni strani zavezujejo vse prejemnike neposrednih plačil kot skupna pravila, ki se uporabljajo za vse sheme pomoči, urejene s to uredbo, in zato zunaj okvira zgolj shem pomoči za govedo, in so na drugi strani samo nekatera od pravil, ki jih je treba spo�tovati glede navzkrižne skladnosti.
In that regard, it must also be pointed out that the total amount of direct payments granted in the context of implementation of the CAP reform does not correspond to the total amount of direct payments received in the context of the rules applicable prior to that reform.
Glede tega je prav tako treba pojasniti, da celoten znesek neposrednih plačil, dodeljenih v okviru izvajanja reforme SKP, ne ustreza celotnemu znesku neposrednih plačil, ki so bila prejeta v okviru ureditve, veljavne pred to.
Moreover, that total amount is liable to be affected by the option open to Member States, in accordance with Articles 58 to 63 of Regulation No 1782/2003, and chosen by the Federal Republic of Germany, to regionalise the single payment scheme, such regionalisation entailing determination of the single payment at a standard rate for the beneficiaries established in the regions concerned.
Poleg tega na ta znesek lahko vpliva izbira, ki je državam članicam ponujena v skladu s členi od 58 do 63 Uredbe �t. 1782/2003, da ta celotni znesek uporabijo – enako kot Zvezna republika Nemčija – za regionalizacijo sheme enotnega plačila, zaradi česar taka regionalizacija povzroči pav�alno določitev enotnega plačila v korist upravičencev, ki so v zadevnih regijah.
As for the amount of the penalty, since the rules on the identification and registration of bovine animals introduced by Regulation No 1760/2000 now constitute only some of the standards to be respected pursuant to crosscompliance, that amount no longer consists of an automatic reduction of the aid, subject, where appropriate, to a ceiling, established on the basis of the number of cases of noncompliance in relation to the number of animals present on the holding, but results from the application of predefined reduction percentages of varying amounts, in accordance with Article 7(1) of Regulation No 1782/2003, according to the severity, extent, permanence and repetition of each case of noncompliance.
Ker so pravila o identifikaciji in registraciji goveda uvedena z Uredbo �t. 1760/2000, odslej zgolj nekatera od pravil, na podlagi katerih lahko pristojni organi – po tem, ko z uporabo člena 48(1)(c) Uredbe �t.
On the basis of the latter criteria the competent authorities, after evaluating, in application of Article 48(1)(c) of Regulation No 796/2004, the importance of the noncompliance in respect of each of the rules on crosscompliance, may decide to decrease or increase the percentage of the reduction, or not to make any reduction.
796/2004 ocenijo pomembnost neskladnosti glede na vsako od pravil o navzkrižni skladnosti – znižajo ali zvi�ajo odstotek znižanja ali pa zneska celo sploh ne nižajo, in ki jih je treba spo�tovati v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo, znesek kazni ni več samodejno znižanje pomoči – katerega zgornja meja je odvisno od primera določena – ki bi se ga določilo glede na �tevilo neskladnosti v razmerju do �tevila živali na kmetijskem gospodarstvu, temveč izhaja iz uporabe odstotkov vnaprej določenega znižanja, katerega intenzivnost se spreminja v skladu s členom 7(1) Uredbe �t. 1782/2003, odvisno od resnosti, obsega, trajnosti in ponavljanja vsakega primera neskladnosti.
Moreover, pursuant to Article 66(3) of Regulation No 796/2004, where more than one noncompliance with regard to different areas subject to crosscompliance are determined, the percentages of reduction relating to each case are, up to a certain ceiling, added together.
Poleg tega se na podlagi člena 66(3) Uredbe �t. 796/2004, kadar je ugotovljenih več primerov neskladnosti na različnih področjih navzkrižne skladnosti, v mejah določene zgornje meje dodajo odstotki znižanj, ki se nana�ajo na vsak primer.
Accordingly, there is no need for the Court to examine whether the application, were it possible, of the provisions of that system of penalties, or some of them, would entail a less severe administrative penalty in a situation such as Mr Jager’s.
Zato je treba – ne da bi bilo treba preskusiti, ali bi uporaba, čeprav je mogoča, določb tega sistema kazni ali, odvisno od primera, nekaterih določb pomenila milej�o upravno kazen v položaju, v kakr�nem je R.
That provision which, as stated at paragraph 66 of this judgment, does constitute such a ‘subsequent amendment’ of Article 10c of Regulation No 3887/92, inasmuch as it introduces inter alia an upper limit on the reduction applicable, contains a system of penalties which are less severe than those set out in the latter provision.
Ta določba, ki pomeni – kot je bilo ugotovljeno v točki 66 te sodbe – tako „poznej[�o] spreme[mbo]“ člena 10c Uredbe �t. 3887/92, namreč s tem, da je med drugim uvedla najvi�jo omejitev znižanja, ki se lahko uporabi, obsega sistem milej�ih kazni od tistih, ki so določene v zadnjenavedeni določbi.
It is therefore for the national court to apply Article 39(1) retroactively to Mr Jager.
Zato mora predložitveno sodi�če glede R. Jagra retroaktivno uporabiti določbe navedenega člena 39(1).
The second sentence of Article 2(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communi-
Člen 2(2), drugi stavek, Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 2988/95 z dne 18. decembra 1995 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti je treba
2008 — CASE C-420/06 ties’ financial interests is to be interpreted as meaning that the provisions laid down by Articles 66 and 67 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 of 21 April 2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of crosscompliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, as amended and corrected by Commission Regulation (EC) No 239/2005 of 11 February 2005, may not be applied retroactively to an application for ‘livestock’ aid falling within the scope ratione temporis of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 of 23 December 1992 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2801/1999 of 21 December 1999, which gave rise to an exclusion from the benefit of aid under Article 10c of that regulation.
2008 – ZADEVA C-420/06 razlagati tako, da členov 66 in 67 Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 796/2004 z dne 21. aprila 2004 o podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje navzkrižne skladnosti, modulacije in integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema, predvidenih z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike ter o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete, kot je bila spremenjena in popravljena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 239/2005 z dne 11. februarja 2005, ni mogoče uporabiti retroaktivno za zahtevek za pomoč „na žival“, za katero se ratione temporis uporablja Uredba Komisije (EGS) št. 3887/92 z dne 23. decembra 1992 o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo integriranega upravnega in kontrolnega sistema za nekatere programe pomoči Skupnosti, kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2801/1999 z dne 21. decembra 1999, ki je privedla do izključitve od pomoči na podlagi člena 10c te uredbe.
Case C-446/05
Zadeva C-446/05
Criminal proceedings against Ioannis Doulamis
Kazenski postopek proti Ioannisu Doulamisu
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles)
(Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles)
(Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 10 EC — National legislation prohibiting advertising of dental care services)
„Člen 81 ES v povezavi s členom 10 ES – Nacionalni zakon, ki prepoveduje ogla�evanje na področju zobozdravstvenih storitev“
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 13 March 2008 . . . . . . .
Sodba Sodi�ča (drugi senat) z dne 13. marca 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Competition — Community rules — Obligations of the Member States(Arts 3(1)(g) EC, 10 EC and 81 EC)
Konkurenca – Pravila Skupnosti – Obveznosti držav članic(členi 3(1)(g) ES, 10 ES in 81 ES)
SUMMARY — CASE C-446/05 its own rules of the character of legislation by delegating to private economic operators responsibility for taking decisions affecting the economic sphere.
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-446/05 naravo državnega ukrepa s prenosom pristojnosti za sprejetje odločitev, ki posegajo v gospodarsko sfero, na zasebne subjekte.
Such a law does not fall within any of the situations for the combined application of Articles 10 EC and 81 EC.
Tak zakon torej ne izhaja iz nobene izmed hipotez glede povezane uporabe členov 10 ES in 81 ES.
Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 3(1)(g) EC and the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, does not preclude a national law which prohibits any person or dental care providers, in the context of professional services or a dental surgery, from engaging in advertising of any kind in the dental care sector.
Člen 81 ES, v povezavi s členoma 3(1)(g) ES in 10, drugi odstavek, ES, ne nasprotuje taki nacionalni zakonodaji, ki vsakomur oziroma ponudnikom zobozdravstvenih storitev prepoveduje, da v okviru svobodnega poklica ali zobozdravstvene ordinacije kakor koli ogla�ujejo na področju zobozdravstva.
Articles 10 EC and 81 EC are infringed where a Member State requires or encourages the adoption of agreements, decisions or concerted practices contrary to Article 81 EC or reinforces their effects, or where it divests
Gre namreč za kr�itev členov 10 ES in 81 ES, če država članica bodisi predpi�e ali spodbuja sklepanje sporazumov, ki so v nasprotju s členom 81 ES, ali krepi učinke takih sporazumov bodisi če svojim predpisom odvzame
(see paras 20, 21, 24, operative part)
(Glej točke 20, 21, 24 in izrek.)
EC, and has referred a question to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of those provisions.
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI GENERALNEGA PRAVOBRANILCAYVESA BOTA, predstavljeni 22. novembra 2007 1 členoma 3(1)(g) ES in 10, drugi odstavek, ES, in Sodi�ču postavlja vpra�anje za predhodno odločanje, ki se nana�a na razlago teh določb.
The purpose of these preliminary ruling proceedings is to enable the referring court to assess the compatibility with Community law of its national legislation prohibiting dental care providers from advertising their services to the general public.
Namen tega postopka predhodnega odločanja je predložitvenemu sodi�ču omogočiti, da presodi, ali je s pravom Skupnosti združljiva nacionalna zakonodaja, ki ponudnikom zobozdravstvenih storitev prepoveduje ogla�evanje svojih storitev.
In this Opinion, I shall state that, in my view, the legislation at issue does not fall within the scope of those provisions, so that they must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude it.
V teh sklepnih predlogih bom navedel, da zadevna zakonodaja po mojem mnenju ne sodi na področje uporabe navedenih določb, tako da bi jih bilo treba razlagati tako, da ji ne nasprotujejo.
They originate in a criminal prosecution brought in Belgium against Mr Doulamis, who operates a dental laboratory and dental clinic in that Member State and who is accused of having placed advertisements for that laboratory and that clinic in the Belgacom telephone directory.
Obravnavani postopek izvira iz kazenskih postopkov, ki so bili v Belgiji sproženi proti I. Doulamisu, ki ima v tej državi članici laboratorij in zobno kliniko in ki se mu očita, da je ta laboratorij in to kliniko ogla�eval v imeniku Belgacom.
I shall also say that the compatibility of that legislation with Community law must be examined in the light of Articles 43 EC and 49 EC on the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services.
Prav tako bom opozoril, da je treba združljivost te zakonodaje s pravom Skupnosti obravnavati glede na člena 43 ES in 49 ES v zvezi s pravico do ustanavljanja in svobodo opravljanja storitev.
The Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles (Court of First Instance, Brussels), adjudicating on a criminal matter, questions whether the legislation on which that prosecution is based is compatible with Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 3(1)(g) EC and the second paragraph of Article 10
Tribunal de première instance iz Bruslja (prvostopenjsko kazensko sodi�če, Belgija), ki odloča v primeru lažjih kaznivih dejanj, spra�uje o združljivosti zakonodaje, na kateri temelji ta pregon, s členom 81 ES v povezavi s
I shall state that a ban on all advertising of dental care services to the general public constitutes a restriction on the exercise of those freedoms.
Navedel bom, da pomeni prepoved slehernega ogla�evanja na področju zobozdravstva omejevanje izvr�evanja teh svobod.
I shall explain why that restriction is, in my view, justified on the ground of the protection of public health
Pojasnil bom, v čem je ta omejitev po mojem mnenju upravičena z varovanjem javnega zdravja, če
where the national legislation in question does not have the effect of prohibiting a dental care provider from giving basic details, free from enticement or incentive, making known his existence as a professional in a telephone directory or other source of information accessible by the public.
zadevna nacionalna zakonodaja ponudniku zobozdravstvenih storitev ne prepoveduje, da bi v telefonskem imeniku ali drugih sredstvih obve�čanja, dostopnih javnosti, na način, ki ne bi bil zanimiv ali spodbujajoč, navedel le podatke, ki omogočajo seznanitev z njegovim obstojem kot strokovnjakom.
I — The legal framework
I – Pravni okvir
The act on the part of mutual clinics and hospitals of informing their members of the dates and times of consultations, the names of those holding the consultations and any changes to these shall not constitute advertising for the purposes of this article.’
Ogla�evanje, opredeljeno v tem členu, ne pomeni dejstva, da vzajemne klinike in poliklinike svoje člane seznanjajo z dnevi in urami posvetovanj, imeni oseb, ki ta posvetovanja opravljajo, in s tem povezanimi spremembami.“
A — National law
A – Nacionalno pravo
B — Community law
B – Pravo Skupnosti
Article 3 of the Loi du 15 avril 1958 relative à la publicité en matière de soins dentaires (Law of 15 April 1958 on advertising in dental care matters) 2imposes penalties on those who infringe Article 1 of that law, which is worded as follows:
V členu 3 belgijskega zakona z dne 15. aprila 1958 o ogla�evanju na področju zobozdravstva, 2so določene kazni za ravnanja v nasprotju s členom 1 navedenega zakona, ki določa:
‘No person may, whether directly or indirectly, engage in advertising of any kind with a view to treating or providing treatment, whether or not by a qualified person, in Belgium or abroad, for dental or oral ailments, lesions or abnormalities, by means, inter alia, of displays or signs, inscriptions or plaques liable to be misleading as to the lawful nature of the activity advertised, leaflets, circulars, handouts and brochures, via
„Nihče ne sme neposredno ali posredno na kakr�en koli način ogla�evati, da zdravi ali omogoča zdravljenje obolenj, po�kodb ali anomalij ust in zobovja s strani kvalificirane ali nekvalificirane osebe, v Belgiji ali v tujini, zlasti v izložbah ali z izveski, napisi ali tablami, ki bi lahko povzročili zmoto glede zakonitosti dejavnosti, ki se ogla�uje, s
Article 81(1) EC provides that the following are to be prohibited as incompatible with the common market: all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the common market.
V skladu s členom 81(1) ES so nezdružljivi s skupnim trgom in prepovedani vsi sporazumi med podjetji, sklepi podjetni�kih združenj in usklajena ravnanja, ki bi lahko prizadeli trgovino med državami članicami in katerih cilj ali posledica je preprečevanje, omejevanje ali izkrivljanje konkurence na skupnem trgu.
2 — ‘The Law of 1958’.
2 – V nadaljevanju: zakon iz leta 1958.
Member States.
DOULAMIS članicah.
Dental care was the subject
Zobozdravstvo je predmet direktiv
The second paragraph of Article 10 EC imposes an obligation on Member States to abstain from any measure which could jeopardise the attainment of the objectives of the Treaty.
Člen 10, drugi odstavek, ES državam članicam nalaga, naj se vzdržijo vseh ukrepov, ki bi lahko ogrozili doseganje ciljev te pogodbe.
Article 49 EC prohibits restrictions on the freedom to provide services within the Community in respect of nationals of Member States who are established in a State of the Community other than that of the person for whom the services are intended.
Na podlagi člena 49 ES so prepovedane omejitve svobode opravljanja storitev v Skupnosti za državljane držav članic, ki imajo sedež v eni izmed držav Skupnosti, vendar ne v državi osebe, ki so ji so storitve namenjene.
Article 3(1)(g) EC provides that the activities of the European Community are to include, as provided for in the Treaty and in accordance with the timetable set out therein, a system ensuring that competition in the internal market is not distorted.
Člen 3(1)(g) ES določa, da dejavnosti Skupnosti v skladu z določbami te pogodbe in v njej opredeljenim časovnim razporedom vključujejo sistem, ki zagotavlja, da na notranjem trgu ni izkrivljanja konkurence.
Under Articles 46 EC and 55 EC, Articles 43 EC and 49 EC are not to constitute an obstacle to restrictions laid down on grounds of public health.
Člena 43 ES in 49 ES v skladu s členo - ma 46 ES in 55 ES ne preprečujeta upravičenih omejitev zaradi javnega zdravja.
Secondary legislation on advertising
Pravo na področju ogla�evanja
Article 43 EC prohibits restrictions on the freedom of establishment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of another Member State.
Člen 43 ES prepoveduje omejitve glede pravice do ustanavljanja za državljane ene države članice na ozemlju druge države članice.
In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 43 EC, freedom of establishment is to include the right to take up and pursue activities as selfemployed persons and to set up and manage undertakings.
V skladu s členom 43, drugi odstavek, ES pravica do ustanavljanja zajema pravico začeti in opravljati dejavnost kot samozaposlena oseba ter pravico do ustanovitve in vodenja podjetij.
Secondary legislation on advertising comprises a general set of rules and special rules applicable, on the one hand, to specific
Sekundarna zakonodaja na področju ogla�evanja zajema splo�no ureditev in posebne ureditve, ki se uporabljajo za določene proizvode in za posebne subjekte, pristojne za obve�čanje.
3 — Council Directive of 25 July 1978 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of the formal qualifications of practitioners of dentistry, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services (OJ 1978 L 233, p. 1).
3 – Direktiva Sveta z dne 25. julija 1978 o medsebojnem priznavanju diplom, spričeval in drugih dokazil o formalnih kvalifikacijah zobozdravnikov in o ukrepih za olaj�anje uresničevanja pravice do ustanavljanja podjetij in pravice do zagotavljanja storitev (UL L 233, str. 1).
4 — Council Directive of 25 July 1978 concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of the activities of dental practitioners (OJ 1978 L 233, p. 10).
4 – Direktiva Sveta z dne 25. julija 1978 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o zobozdravni�ki dejavnosti (UL L 233, str. 10).
That directive and Directive 78/686 were repealed and replaced by Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22).
To direktivo in Direktivo 78/686 je razveljavila in nadomestila Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/36/ES z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij (UL L 255, str. 22).
Article 47(3) EC provides that, in the case of the medical and allied and pharmaceutical professions, the progressive abolition of restrictions on the freedom of establishment is to be dependent upon coordination of the
V skladu s členom 47(3) ES je postopno odpravljanje omejitev pri zdravstvenih delavcih, zdravstvenih sodelavcih in farmacevtih odvisno od uskladitve pogojev za njihovo opravljanje v posameznih državah
At the time of the facts in the main proceedings, the general set of rules was contained in Directive 84/450/EEC, 5 the purpose of which was to harmonise national laws concerning protection against misleading advertising.
Splo�na ureditev je bila v času dejanskega stanja v sporu o glavni stvari določena v Direktivi 84/450/EGS, 5 katere namen je usklajevanje nacionalnih zakonodaj na področju varstva proti zavajujočemu ogla�evanju.
That measure was amended by Directive 97/55/EC, 6which extended its scope to comparative advertising, and by Directive 2005/29/EC.
Ta člen je bil spremenjen z Direktivo 97/55/ES, 6 v kateri je njeno področje uporabe raz�irjeno na primerjalno ogla�evanje, in z Direktivo 2005/29/ES.
7 Directive 84/450 was repealed and replaced by Directive 2006/114/EC. 8
7Spremenjena Direk- tiva 84/450 je bila razveljavljena in nadome�čena z Direktivo 2006/114/ES. 8
Comparative advertising is any advertising which explicitly or by implication identifies a competitor or goods or services offered by a competitor.
V skladu s to direktivo primerjalno ogla�evanje pomeni ogla�evanje, ki izrecno ali z nakazovanjem določa identiteto konkurenta ali blaga oziroma storitev, ki jih ponuja konkurent.
11It is permitted only if it meets a number of conditions. 12
11Dovoljeno je le, če je izpolnjenih več pogojev. 12
Directive 84/450 defines advertising as the making of a representation in any form in connection with a trade, business, craft or profession in order to promote the supply of goods or services, including immovable property, rights and obligations. 9
Direktiva 84/450 opredeljuje ogla�evanje kot kakr�no koli obliko predstavitve v zvezi s trgovsko, poslovno, obrtno dejavnostjo ali svobodno poklicno dejavnostjo, katere namen je spodbujanje prodaje blaga ali storitev, vključno z nepremičninami, pravicami in obveznostmi. 9