natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
NN 151/2002 (ex N 113/B/2001).For details see below under ‘Cases’.Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and mediumsized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products (OJ L 1, 3.1.2004).See: http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/stateaid/exemption/index_en.htm NN 34/A/2000 Quality programmes and quality labels AMA Biosiegel and AMA Gütesiegel — Austria, N 195/2003 MLC quality beef and sheepmeat advertising and NN 196/2003 MLC quality pigmeat advertising — United Kingdom.
Za podrobnejše informacije glej spodaj pod „Primeri“.Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1/2004 z dne 23. decembra 2003 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, ki se ukvarjajo s proizvodnjo, predelavo in trženjem kmetijskih proizvodov (UL L 1, 3.1.2004).Glej: http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/stateaid/exemption/index_en.htm NN 34/A/2000, Programi kakovosti in oznaki kakovosti AMA Biosiegel in AMA Gütesiegel – Avstrija, N 195/2003, Oglaševanje kakovostnega govejega in ovčjega mesa MLC in NN 196/2003, MLC Oglaševanje kakovostnega svinjskega mesa MLC – Združeno kraljestvo.N 571/02, Zakonodaja o promocijskem skladu CMA – Nemčija.
— confirm its position on aid for labels referring to the origin of products (
• potrdi svoje stališče o pomoči za oznake, ki se nanašajo na poreklo proizvodov (
State aid in the sheries sector which does not fall within the block exemption regulation (212) will still have to be notified to the Commission.
Državno pomoč v ribištvu, ki ne spada v okvir uredbe o skupinskih izjemah (212), bo še vedno treba priglasiti Komisiji.
Such State aid will be subject to new guidelines for the examination of State aid to sheries and aquaculture (213), which also entered into force on 1 November.
Za tako državno pomoč bodo veljale nove smernice za pregled državne pomoči za ribištvo in ribogojstvo (213), ki so prav tako začele veljati 1. novembra.
N 571/02 CMA promotion fund law — Germany.N 195/2003 MLC quality beef and sheepmeat advertising and Case N 196/2003 MLC quality pigmeat advertising — United Kingdom.N 175/03 Meat and livestock commission generic meat advertising scheme — UK and C 78/2003 (ex NN 36/98, ex N 610/97) Advertising of Sicilian products (Article 4 Regional Law 27/1997) — Italy (Sicily).Commission Regulation (EC) No 1595/2004 of 8 September 2004 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and mediumsized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of sheries products (OJ L 291, 14.9.2004).OJ C 229, 14.9.2004.
N 195/2003, Oglaševanje kakovostnega govejega in ovčjega mesa MLC in primer N 196/2003 Oglaševanje kakovostnega svinjskega mesa MLC – Združeno kraljestvo.N 175/03, Program oglaševanja generičnega mesa Komisije za meso in živino – Združeno kraljestvo in C 78/2003 (prej NN 36/98, prej N 610/97), Oglaševanje sicilijanskih proizvodov (Člen 4 regionalnega zakona 27/1997) – Italija (Sicilija).Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1595/2004 z dne 8. decembra 2004 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč malim in srednje velikim podjetjem za proizvodnjo, predelavo in trženje ribiških proizvodov (UL L 291, 14.9.2004).UL C 229, 14.9.2004.
Report on competition policy 2004 — Volume 1
Poročilo o politiki konkurence za leto 2004 – Zvezek 1 cene za premog, velik del evropskega premogovništva ostaja nekonkurenčen brez večjih državnih subvencij.
Despite the recent dramatic increase in the spot market price for coal, large parts of Europe’s coal industry remain uncompetitive without heavy State subsidies.
Komisija je ohranila naklonjeno stališče do javnega nanciranja, ki spodbuja okolju prijazne vrste prevoza, da bi dosegla zmanjšanje cestnega prevoza.
384. e Commission maintained a favourable approach towards public funding that promotes environmentally friendly modes of transport in order to achieve a reduction in road transport. e railways are therefore considered to be a key element in the Community’s common transport policy, which seeks to develop a sustainable transport system by shi ing the balance between di erent modes of transport.
Zato so železnice obravnavane kot ključni element v skupni prometni politiki Skupnosti, ki želi razviti trajnostni sistem prevoza s spremembo ravnotežja med različnimi vrstami prevoza. Eden glavnih ciljev je ponovna oživitev železnic.
Rail transport has, once again, to be made competitive enough to remain one of the leading players in the transport system in an enlarged Europe.
Železniški prevoz bo moral ponovno postati dovolj konkurenčen, da bo ostal eden ključnih akterjev v sistemu prevoza v razširjeni Evropi.
By 2008, the entire European freight network, both internationally and nationally, will have been opened up completely. e arrival of new railway companies must make the sector more competitive and encourage national companies to restructure.
Do leta 2008 mora biti celotno evropsko omrežje za prevoz blaga popolnoma odprto, in sicer na mednarodni in nacionalni ravni. S prihodom novih železniških podjetij bo moral sektor postati konkurenčnejši in spodbuditi nacionalna podjetja k prestrukturiranju.
In particular, the Commission authorised various aid schemes which aim to o set the additional costs of combined transport.
Komisija je zlasti odobrila različne programe pomoči, katerih namen je nadomestiti dodatne stroške kombiniranega prevoza.
In the maritime sector, the new Community guidelines on State aid to maritime transport were applied for the rst time (214). e Commission ensured in particular that
V pomorstvu so bile prvič uporabljene nove smernice Skupnosti za državno pomoč v pomorskem prometu (214).
Member States accept the appropriate measures proposed in these guidelines.
Komisija je zlasti zagotovila, da države članice sprejemajo ustrezne ukrepe, predlagane v teh smernicah.
In air transport, the year saw an important decision of the Commission in the Ryanair–Charleroi case. e Commission recognised that limited amounts of State aid may be justified to ensure better use of secondary airports with a view to creating
Komisija je priznala, da so lahko omejeni zneski državne pomoči upravičeni, da se zagotovi boljša izraba sekundarnih letališč ter vzpostavijo nove prometne povezave, ki bodo zagotavljale regionalne koristi in zmanjševale preobremenjenost zračnega prostora.
Public services/services of general (economic) interest
IV – Nadzor državnih pomoči
As regards competition policy, the Commission dealt with the question of how far compensation for services of general economic interest (SGEIs) could distort competition from a State aid perspective.
V zvezi s politiko konkurence je Komisija obravnavala vprašanje, kako močno bi lahko nadomestilo za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena izkrivilo konkurenco z vidika državne pomoči.
Following the Altmark judgment (215) concerning the description of compensation as State aid, the Commission drew up a set of three proposals with a view to putting the criteria set out by the Court into practice.
Po sodbi Altmark (215) o presoji nadomestila kot državni pomoči je Komisija sestavila sklop treh predlogov, da bi merila, ki jih je določilo Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, udejanjila v praksi:
A Community framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation clarifies the criteria according to which the Commission intends to assess public service compensation by Member States under the State aid rules.
Okvir Skupnosti za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve pojasnjuje merila, v skladu s katerimi namerava Komisija oceniti nadomestilo držav članic za javne storitve v skladu s pravili o državni pomoči.
In this way, the e ectiveness of providing SGEIs should increase without jeopardising their operation.
Tako bi se morala učinkovitost izvajanja storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena povečati brez ogrožanja njihovega opravljanja.
Otherwise, the compensation constitutes State aid and needs to be notified.
Drugače nadomestilo pomeni državno pomoč, ki jo je treba priglasiti.
Such notified aid could be declared compatible with the Treaty under Article 86(2) EC provided that it is necessary for the operation of an SGEI and does not a ect the development of trade to an extent contrary to the interests of the Community.
Taka priglašena pomoč je lahko združljiva s Pogodbo v skladu s členom 86(2) ES, če je to potrebno za izvajanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena in ne vpliva na razvoj trgovine v obsegu, ki bi nasprotoval interesom Skupnosti.
In accordance with Article 86 EC and the corresponding case-law, Member States have a wide margin of discretion in de ning SGEIs.
V skladu s členom 86 ES in ustrezno sodno prakso imajo države članice širok manevrski prostor pri opredelitvi storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
As regards the assessment under State aid rules, however, it is necessary for undertakings providing an SGEI to have been specifically entrusted with this task by the Member State concerned.
Vendar pa morajo zadevne države članice podjetjem, ki zagotavljajo storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, v zvezi s presojo v skladu s pravili o državni pomoči posebej naložiti to nalogo.
Accordingly, a public service assignment is required in order to de ne the respective obligations of the undertaking and of the State (national, regional or local authority). is assignment must specify:
Tako je dodelitev javnih storitev potrebna, da se opredelijo posamezne obveznosti podjetja in države (zadevni nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni organi). Ta dodelitev mora podrobneje opredeliti:
— the precise nature of the public service obligation;
• natančno naravo obveznosti javne storitve,
— the undertaking(s) and the territory concerned;
• zadevno(-a) podjetje(-a) in ozemlje,
Case C-280/00.
Zadeva C-280/00.
See points 621 and following of the 2003 Competition Report.
Glej točko 621 in naslednje točke Poročila o konkurenci za leto 2003.
A proposed decision under Article 86 EC would exempt certain compensatory measures from the requirement of prior notification. is would be the case with compensation below certain thresholds, as well as with compensation granted for specific public services, notably hospitals and social housing, but also for maritime links to islands granted in accordance with sectoral rules and with an annual traffic not exceeding 100 000 passengers.
Predlagana odločba v skladu s členom 86 ES bi določene izravnalne ukrepe izvzela iz zahteve predhodne priglasitve. Do tega bi prišlo pri nadomestilu pod določenimi pragovi ter nadomestilu, odobrenem za posebne javne storitve, zlasti bolnišnice in socialna stanovanja, pa tudi za pomorske povezave do otokov, odobrene v skladu s sektorskimi pravili in letnim prometom do 100 000 potnikov.
Under this proposal, Member States would be obliged — as is usual with exemption Regulations — to meet Commission safeguards in respect of all information necessary to assess the compatibility of the compensation with the State aid rules.
V skladu s tem predlogom bi morale države članice – kot je to običajno pri uredbaho izvzetju – izpolnjevati zaščitni ukrep Komisije ob upoštevanju vseh informacij, potrebnih za ocenitev združljivosti nadomestila s pravili o državni pomoči.
Amendment of the transparency directive
Sprememba direktive o preglednosti
ey will allow the Commission to full its task of ensuring that SGEIs can operate properly within the EU and receive State compensation only to the extent necessary
Komisiji bodo omogočali, da izpolni svojo nalogo zagotavljanja, da lahko storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena pravilno delujejo v okviru EU in prejmejo državno nadomestilo samo v takem obsegu, ki je potreben za njihovo izvajanje.
IV — State aid control for their provision.
IV – Nadzor državnih pomoči
So far the spring update of the scoreboard has covered data for the period t–2, i.e. 2002 data in 2004.
Do sedaj je pomladanska dopolnitev statističnega pregleda zajemala podatke za obdobje t-2, to pomeni podatke za leto 2002 v letu 2004.
As part of the new annual reporting arrangements, the Commission and Member States have pledged to reduce this time-lag, with the result that 2004 data should be published in the autumn 2005 update. us the autumn scoreboard will each year include the latest data, while the spring scoreboard will provide more analytical coverage of a selected topic.
Komisija in države članice so se kot del novih letnih dogovorov o poročanju zavezale, da bodo zmanjšale ta časovni zamik, zaradi česar bi morali biti podatki za leto 2004 objavljeni v jesenski dopolnitvi leta 2005. Tako bo jesenski statistični pregled vsako leto vključeval najnovejše podatke, medtem ko bo pomladanski statistični pregled zagotovil bolj analitično pokrivanje izbrane teme.
Part two includes a review of the steps taken by Member States to implement the Lisbon agenda and follow up subsequent Council conclusions on State aid.
Drugi del vsebuje pregled ukrepov, ki so jih države članice sprejele za izvajanje lizbonske agende in nadaljevanje naknadnih sklepov Sveta o državni pomoči.
More specifically, this comprises reduction of aid, redirection of aid towards horizontal objectives and assessing the e ectiveness of aid. e nal part, as in all scoreboard updates, includes a summary of the e orts undertaken by the Commission to simplify and modernise State aid control.
Podrobneje to zajema znižanje pomoči, preusmeritev pomoči k horizontalnim ciljem in oceno učinkovitosti pomoči. Končni del, kot v vseh dopolnitvah statističnega pregleda, vsebuje povzetek prizadevanj Komisije na področju poenostavitve in posodobitve nadzora državnih pomoči.
Belgium: Transfer of rst pillar pension obligations from Belgacom
Belgija: prenos pokojninskih obveznosti iz prvega stebra od družbe Belgacom na
220 ) to the Belgian State (
220 belgijsko državo (
In October 2003, the Belgian authorities informed the Commission about an agreement between Belgacom, the Belgian State and the private shareholders to transfer the socalled ‘first pillar’ pension obligations towards the company’s civil servants from
Oktobra 2003 so belgijski organi Komisijo obvestili o dogovoru med družbo Belgacom, belgijsko državo in zasebnimi delničarji, da prenesejo t. i. pokojninske obveznosti iz „prvega stebra“ do javnih uslužbencev družbe Belgacom na belgijsko državo (pokojnine iz „prvega stebra“ so tiste, ki so po navadi predvidene v okviru splošnega sistema socialne varnosti posamezne države).
French and German versions of the executive summary are available.
Na voljo sta francoska in nemška različica povzetka.
See also press release IP/04/1356.N 567/2003.
Glej tudi sporočilo za javnost IP/04/1356.N 567/2003.
In return, the Belgian State received a one-off payment from Belgacom amounting to EUR 5 billion as well as yearly continuous contributions guaranteeing the nancing of future pension obligations.
Poročilo o politiki konkurence za leto 2004 – Zvezek 1 enkratno plačilo od družbe Belgacom v znesku 5 milijard EUR ter letne redne prispevke, ki so zagotavljali nanciranje prihodnjih pokojninskih obveznosti.
In its decision of 21 January, the Commission concluded that the transfer was nancially neutral because Belgacom, in exchange for transferring its pension obligations to the Belgian State, pays the latter an amount corresponding to the net present value of the obligations taken over by the Belgian State. erefore, the Commission considered that this transaction did not give Belgacom an advantage beyond that which would have been available under normal market conditions and accordingly no State aid was involved.
Komisija je v svoji odločbi z dne 21. januarja ugotovila, da je bil prenos nančno nevtralen, saj družba Belgacom v zameno za prenos svojih pokojninskih obveznosti do belgijske države tej plačuje znesek, ki ustreza neto trenutni vrednosti obveznosti, ki jih je prevzela belgijska država. Zato je Komisija menila, da ta prenos družbi Belgacom ni dal nobene večje prednosti, kot bi jih imela po običajnih tržnih pogojih, in zato ni šlo za državno pomoč.
On 20 April, the Commission approved the aid granted by France between 1980 and 2001 to the Coopérative d’exportation du livre français (Celf). e Commission considered that the aid to Celf for processing small orders of French-language books, although granted unlawfully, was however compatible with the common market under Article 87(3)(d) of the Treaty in that it is proportional to the cultural objective pursued. e Commission found that the aid did not a ect trade and competition in the Community to an extent contrary to the common interest. e purpose of the aid was to maintain the non-profitable activity of Celf.
Komisija je 20. aprila odobrila pomoč, ki jo je Francija v obdobju med letoma 1980 in 2001 dodelila družbi Coopérative d’exportation du livre français (Celf).
Celf had to accept any type of order from booksellers (not nal consumers) established abroad in non-French-speaking areas, irrespective of the amount of the order, pro tability and destination.
Komisija je menila, da je bila pomoč družbi Celf za sprejemanje manjših naročil knjig v francoskem jeziku, čeprav je bila dodeljena nezakonito, združljiva s skupnim trgom v skladu s členom 87(3)(d) Pogodbe, saj je bila sorazmerna z zaželenim kulturnim ciljem.
As part of the aid, it received an operating grant intended to o set the extra cost of handling orders below FRF 500 (i.e. approximately EUR 76). is decision took into proper consideration the ruling of the Court of First Instance of 28 February 2002 which partially annulled an older Commission decision of 10 June 1998 on the ground that the Commission should have distinguished the export agency market from that for the export of French-language books in general.
Namen pomoči je bil ohraniti neprofitno dejavnost družbe Celf. Družba Celf je morala sprejeti vse vrste naročil od prodajalcev knjig (ki niso bili končni potrošniki), ki so delovali v tujini na nefrancosko govorečih območjih, ne glede na znesek naročila, donosnost in namembni kraj.
C 39/1996 (ex NN 127/92); positive decision: 20.4.2004.
Kot del pomoči je družba prejela pomoč za tekoče poslovanje, namenjeno nadomestitvi dodatnih stroškov sprejemanja naročil, nižjih od 500 FRF (tj. približno 76 EUR).
Modification of UMTS licence fee, France (
Sprememba licenčnine za UMTS, Francija (
In October 2002, the Commission received a complaint against the French government’s decision to reduce the UMTS licence fees originally payable by Orange and SFR.
Komisija je oktobra 2002 prejela pritožbo zoper odločitev francoske vlade, da bi znižala licenčnino za UMTS, ki sta jo prvotno plačevali družbi Orange in SFR.
In the case at issue, the Commission noted that the French Government applied to all operators the same conditions for the granting of UMTS licences (duration, fee, technical conditions) and that these conditions were objective and not discriminatory.
V zadevnem primeru je Komisija ugotovila, da je francoska vlada za vse operaterje uporabila enake pogoje za dodelitev licenc UMTS (trajanje, licenčnina, tehnični pogoji) ter da so bili ti pogoji objektivni in nediskriminacijski. Ker vlada ni
Since the government did not discriminate between operators, Orange and SFR were not given any benefits. e Commission therefore decided on 20 July that no State aid was involved and rejected the complaint.
IV – Nadzor državnih pomoči razlikovala med operaterji, družbi Orange in SFR nista imeli nobene prednosti. Zato je Komisija 20. julija odločila, da ni šlo za državno pomoč, in zavrnila pritožbo.
Stranded costs
Nasedli stroški
) and Portugal ( incurred by electricity market incumbents when the sector was not liberalised and which liberalisation makes it di cult, if not impossible, to repay.
Nasedli stroški so stroški, ki so jih imeli proizvajalci na trgu z električno energijo, ko sektor ni bil liberaliziran, in katerih povračilo liberalizacija otežuje ali celo onemogoča.
In July 2001 it adopted a communication that spelled out the methodology that it would use to assess such aid (225).
Julija 2001 je sprejela sporočilo, v katerem je bila opisana metodologija, ki bi jo uporabila za oceno take pomoči (225).
It will be granted to ENEL and the companies that have inherited ENEL’s stranded assets.
Dodeljen bo družbi ENEL in podjetjem, ki so podedovala nasedla sredstva družbe ENEL.
It will cover the costs of relocating gas
Vendar se bo nadomestilo dodelilo samo za plin, uporabljen za proizvodnjo električne energije.
Report on competition policy 2004 — Volume 1 processing outside Italy until 2009. e compensation will be at most EUR 1 465 million.
Poročilo o politiki konkurence za leto 2004 – Zvezek 1 da nadomestijo izgube nekaterih obratov v primerjavi z dobički drugih.
414. e Portuguese case was slightly di erent from the Italian and from other previous cases. e Portuguese captive market was originally structured around a series of longterm contracts between the State-owned network operator and three electricity generation groups instead of a general law setting out the price rules for the electricity sector, as in Member States whose cases had been previously analysed by the Commission. Portugal abolished these longterm contracts and replaced them with State compensation.
Komisija je zagotovila, da je uveden ustrezen mehanizem za redno prilagajanje nadomestila, s katerim se prepreči vsako čezmerno plačilo, celo kadar se konkurenca ne razvije po pričakovanjih.
In addition, supplementary e orts were requested in the marine sector and the conclusion of industrial partnerships covering a significant part of the company’s activities was required in order to strengthen the longterm viability and prospects of the company.
Poleg tega so bila potrebna dodatna prizadevanja v pomorskem sektorju in potrebna sklenitev industrijskih partnerstev, ki zajemajo velik del dejavnosti podjetja, za okrepitev dolgoročne sposobnosti preživetja in obetov podjetja.
Secondly, the State aid has to be limited to the minimum necessary. e Commission found that this condition is satisfied since the restructuring plan authorised
Poleg tega je pomoč časovno omejena, saj se lahko nova državna jamstva, prvič, izdajo v dvoletnem obdobju po sprejetju odločbe, in drugič, država mora v štirih letih prodati vse svoje imetništvo delnic v družbi Alstom, ki izhajajo iz zgoraj navedenega povečanja kapitala.
C 58/2003, decision of 7.7.2004; C(2004)2352.
C 58/2003, odločba z dne 7.7.2004, C(2004) 2352.
On 14 July, the Commission approved restructuring aid granted to MobilCom. e approval of the aid was linked to the condition that MobilCom and its a liates must halt their online direct sales of MobilCom mobile telephony contracts for seven months in order to o set the distortions of competition caused by the aid.
Komisija je 14. julija odobrila pomoč za prestrukturiranje, dodeljeno družbi MobilCom. Odobritev pomoči je bila povezana s pogojem, da morajo družba MobilCom in njene podružnice za sedem mesecev prekiniti svojo neposredno spletno prodajo pogodb za storitve mobilne telefonije MobilCom, da nadomestijo izkrivljanje konkurence, ki jo je povzročila pomoč.
It ran into di culties in 2002.
Leta 2002 je zašel v težave.
Germany granted a rst de ciency guarantee for a loan of EUR 50 million in September 2002 to provide immediate liquidity to the company. is aid was approved as rescue aid in January 2003 (228) and was not part of the nal conditional decision adopted in July 2004 (229).
Nemčija je odobrila prvo jamstvo za izpad dohodka za posojilo v višini 50 milijonov EUR septembra 2002, da bi zagotovila takojšnjo likvidnost podjetja. Ta pomoč je bila kot pomoč za reševanje odobrena januarja 2003 (228) in ni bila del končne pogojne odločbe, sprejete julija 2004 (229).