natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The sector is responsible for maintaining and promoting relations with the media, writing and producing the Ombudsman’s publications, maintaining the Ombudsman’s websites, organising the Ombudsman’s information visits and events, and co-ordinating relations within the European Network of Ombudsmen.
Sektor je odgovoren za vzdrževanje in spodbujanje stikov z med`i, pisanje in izdajanje publikac` varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, vzdrževanje njegovega spletnega mesta, organiziranje varuhovih informativnih obiskov in povezanih dogodkov ter usklajevanje stikov z evropskega omrežja varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic.
Rosita AGNEWHead of Sector (from 1.5.2005)Press and Communications OUcer (until 30.4.2005)Tel. +32 2 284 25 42
Rosita AGNEWVodja sektorja (od 1.5.2005)Strokovna sodelavka za obvešÏanje in tisk (do 30.4.2005)Tel. +32 2 284 25 42
Ben HAGARDHead of Sector (from 1.5.2005)Internet and Communications OUcer (until 30.4.2005)Tel. +33 3 88 17 24 24
Ben HAGARDVodja sektorja (od 1.5.2005)Strokovni sodelavec za obvešÏanje in internet (do 30.4.2005)Tel. +33 3 88 17 24 24
Marc AMIR-TAHMASSEBWeb Developer (from 1.9.2005)Tel. +33 3 88 17 44 10
Annika ÖSTERBERGStrokovna sodelavka za publikac` e (od 1.10.2005)Tel. +33 3 88 17 49 36
Annika ÖSTERBERGPublications OUcer (from 1.10.2005)Tel. +33 3 88 17 49 36
Marc AMIR-TAHMASSEBOblikovalec spletnih strani (od 1.9.2005)Tel. +33 3 88 17 44 10
BY CASE NUMBER
PO ŠTEVILKI PRIMERA
Citizens’ rights
Državljanske pravice
Data protection
ZašÏita podatkov
Commission as guardian of the Treaty
Komis` a kot varuh Pogodbe
Police and judicial cooperation
Polic`sko in pravosodno sodelovanje
- Recruitment
Uslužbenci
- Other questions
– Druga vprašanja
BY TYPE OF MALADMINISTRATION ALLEGED
PO VRSTI DOMNEVNIH NEPRAVILNOSTI
Abuse of power
Zloraba moÏi
Lack or refusal of information
Pomanjkanje ali zavraÏanje posredovanja podatkov
Lack of transparency
Nezadostna preglednost
Error in Article 226 procedure
Napaka pri postopku iz Ïlena 226
Failure to state grounds for decision
Neutemeljena odloÏitev
THEELECTION OF THEEUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
IZVOLITEVEVROPSKEGA VARUHA JLOVEKOVIHPRAVIC
The legal provisions
Zakonodajne doloÏbe
Article 195(2) EC provides that “The Ombudsman shall be appointed a W er each election of the European Parliament for the duration of its term of oU ce.
Jlen 195(2) pogodbe ES doloÏa, da se varuha Ïlovekovih pravic imenuje po vsaki izvolitvi Evropskega parlamenta za obdobje parlamentarnega mandata. Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je lahko ponovno imenovan.
The Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament set out details of the election procedure:
Poslovnik Evropskega parlamenta navaja podrobnosti postopka izvolitve.
At the start of each parliamentary term, immediately a W er his election or in the cases referred to in paragraph 8, the President shall call for nominations for the oU ce of Ombudsman and set a time limit for their submission.
Na zaÏetku vsakega parlamentarnega obdobja, takoj po njegovi izvolitvi ali v primerih iz odstavka 8, predsednik razpiše predložitev kandidatur za funkc` o varuha Ïlovekovih pravic in doloÏi rok njihove predložitve.
A notice calling for nominations shall be published in the OU cial Journal of the European Union.
Obvestilo o razpisu kandidatur se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske un`e. e.
Nominations must have the support of a minimum of thirty-seven Members who are nationals of at least two Member States.
Kandidature mora podpreti najmanj sedemintrideset poslancev, ki so državljani najmanj dveh držav Ïlanic.
Each Member may support only one nomination.
Vsak poslanec lahko podpre samo eno kandidaturo.
Nominations shall include all the supporting documents needed to show conclusively that the nominee fulfils the conditions required by the Regulations on the Ombudsman.
Kandidature morajo vkljuÏevati vse spremljajoÏe dokumente, s katerimi se lahko dejansko pokaže, da kandidat izpolnjuje pogoje, navedene v predpisih, ki urejajo delovanje varuha Ïlovekovih pravic.
Nominations shall be forwarded to the commimee responsible, which may ask to hear the nominees.
Kandidature se posredujejo pristojnemu odboru, ki lahko zahteva predstavitev kandidatov.
A list of admissible nominations in alphabetical order shall then be submimed to the vote of Parliament.
Seznam sprejemljivih kandidatur po abecednem vrstnem redu se nato predloži v glasovanje Parlamentu.
The vote shall be held by secret ballot on the basis of a majority of the votes cast.
Glasovanje je tajno na podlagi veÏine oddanih glasov.
If no candidate is elected a W er the first two ballots, only the two candidates obtaining the largest number of votes in the second ballot may continue to stand.
Je po prvih dveh glasovanjih ni izvoljen noben kandidat, lahko naprej kandidirata le kandidata, ki sta prejela najvišje število glasov v drugem glasovanju.
In the event of any tie the eldest candidate shall prevail.
Je je izid glasovanja neodloÏen, ima prednost najstarejši kandidat.
The Ombudsman shall exercise his duties until his successor takes oUce, except in the case of his death or dismissal.”
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic opravlja svoje dolžnosti do nastopa funkc` e svojega naslednika, razen v primeru smrti ali razrešitve.”
The 2005 election1
Volitve v letu 2005
The European Parliament published a call for nominations in the OU cial Journal of 25 August 2004
Evropski parlament je v Uradnem listu 25. avgusta 20048 objavil razpis kandidatur in doloÏil kot skrajni rok za predložitev kandidatur 30. september 2004.
By lemer of 22 October 2004, the President of the European Parliament informed the President of the Commimee on Petitions that four applications had been received.
Predsednik Evropskega parlamenta je 22. oktobra 2004 s pismom obvestil predsednika Odbora za petic`e, da je prejel štiri vloge.
On 29 November 2004, the Commimee on Petitions organised a public hearing of the two candidates whose applications had been declared admissible, namely: Mr P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS and Mr Giuseppe FORTUNATO.
Odbor za petic`e je 29. novembra 2004 organiziral javno zaslišanje dveh kandidatov, katerih vloge so bile oznaÏene kot popolne, in sicer: P. Nikiforosa DIAMANDOUROSA in Giuseppeja FORTUNATA.
On 11 January 2005, Mr P. Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS was duly elected European Ombudsman by the Members of the European Parliament in plenary session in Strasbourg on the first ballot by 564 votes out of 609 votes cast.
11. januarja 2005 so poslanci Evropskega parlamenta na plenarnem zasedanju v Strasbourgu P. Nikiforosa DIAMANDOUROSA izvolili za evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, in sicer po prvem glasovanju s 564 od 609 oddanih glasov.
The decision of the European Parliament appointing Mr DIAMANDOUROS for the duration of the
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o imenovanju gospoda DIAMANDOUROSA za parlamentarno obdobje
2004-2009 parliamentary term was published in the OU cial Journal of 25 January 2005
2004–2009 je bil objavljen v Uradnem listu dne 25. januarja 2005.9
Detailed information on the election of the European Ombudsman can be found on Parliament’s website at: hmp://www.europarl.europa.eu/comparl/peti/election2004/default_en.htm p://www.europarl.europa.eu/comparl/peti/election2004/default_en.htm
Podrobne informac` e o izvolitvi Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic so objavljene na spletnem mestu Evropskega parlamenta: hmp://www.europarl.europa.eu/comparl/peti/election2004/default_en.htm p://www.europarl.europa.eu/comparl/peti/election2004/default_en.htm
HOW TO CONTACT THEEUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
KAKOSTOPITI VSTIK ZEVROPSKIM VARUHOM JLOVEKOVIHPRAVIC
Page 2
O P S KI
Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
Razmnoževanje v izobraževalne in nekomercialne namene je dovoljeno ob navedbi vira.
This report is published on the internet at: h4 p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu
To poročilo je objavljeno na spletni strani: http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu p://www.ombudsman.europa.eu
PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER
Natisnjeno na belem papirju brez klora
Page 5
EVROPSKI
EUROPEAN O
ČLOVEKOVIH
3333In accordance with Article 195(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3(8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the Performance of the Ombudsman’s Duties, I hereby present my Report for the year 2007.
G. predsednik, v skladu s členom 195(1) Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ter členom 3(8) Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta o predpisih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha človekovih pravic, vam predstavljam svoje poročilo za leto 2006.
TABLE OFCONTENTS
VSEBINA
THE LEGAL BASIS OF THE OMBUDSMAN’S WORK
PRAVNA PODLAGA ZA DELO VARUHA ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
THE MANDATE OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
PRISTOJNOSTI EVROPSKEGA VARUHA ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
ADMISSIBILITY AND GROUNDS FOR INQUIRIES
DOPUSTNOST IN RAZLOGI ZA PREISKAVE
ANALYSIS OF COMPLAINTS EXAMINED IN 2007
ANALIZA PRITOŽB, OBRAVNAVANIH LETA 2007
TRANSFERS AND ADVICE
POSREDOVANJE IN SVETOVANJE
THE OMBUDSMAN’S PROCEDURES
POSTOPKI VARUHA ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
THE OUTCOMES OF INQUIRIES
REZULTATI PREISKAV
DECISIONS CLOSING CASES IN 2007
ODLOČBE, S KATERIMI SO BILI ZAKLJUČENI PRIMERI V LETU 2007
SUMMARIES OF DECISIONS
POVZETKI ODLOČB
CASES WHERE NO MALADMINISTRATION WAS FOUND
PRIMERI, V KATERIH NISO BILE UGOTOVLJENE NEPRAVILNOSTI
CASES SETTLED BY THE INSTITUTION
PRIMERI, KI JIH JE REŠILA INSTITUCIJ A SAMA
FRIENDLY SOLUTIONS ACHIEVED BY THE OMBUDSMAN
SPORAZUMNE REŠITVE, KI JIH JE DOSEGEL VARUH ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
CASES CLOSED WITH A CRITICAL REMARK BY THE OMBUDSMAN
PRIMERI, ZAKLJUČENI S KRITIČNO OCENO VARUHA ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS ACCEPTED BY THE INSTITUTION
OSNUTKI PRIPOROČIL, KI SO JIH INSTITUCIJ E SPREJELE
CASES CLOSED FOR OTHER REASONS
PRIMERI, ZAKLJUČENI PO POSEBNEM POROČILU
CASES CLOSED AFTER A SPECIAL REPORT
PREISKAVE NA LASTNO POBUDO VARUHA ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
OWN-INITIATIVE INQUIRIES BY THE OMBUDSMAN
VPRAŠANJA, KI JIH JE OBRAVNAVAL VARUH ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
THE EUROPEAN NETWORK OF OMBUDSMEN
EVROPSKA MREŽA VARUHOV ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
OTHER OMBUDSMAN SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES
DRUGI SEMINARJI IN KONFERENCE VARUHA ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
OTHER EVENTS WITH OMBUDSMEN AND THEIR STAFF
DRUGI DOGODKI Z VARUHI ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC IN NJIHOVIM OSEBJEM
COMMUNICATIONS
OBVEŠČANJE
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR
6.2 INFORMATIVNI OBISKI
6.6 ONLINE COMMUNICATIONS
6.6 ELEKTRONSKO KOMUNICIRANJE
INDICES OF DECISIONS
SEZNAM ODLOČB
HOW TO CONTACT THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
KAKO STOPITI V STIK Z EVROPSKIM VARUHOM ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
The year 2007 was an important one for the European citizens’ right to good administration.
Leto 2007 je bilo pomembno leto za pravico evropskih državljanov do dobrega upravljanja.
On 12 December, the EU’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, originally proclaimed in December 2000, was signed and proclaimed again by the Presidents of the EU’s three main institutions — the Parliament, Commission and Council.
Dne 12. decembra so Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, prvotno razglašeno decembra 2000, podpisali in ponovno razglasili predsedniki treh glavnih institucij EU – Parlamenta, Komisije in Sveta.
The commitment to a legally binding Charter, contained in the Treaty of Lisbon, reflects a growing realisation that citizens should be placed at the centre of Europe’s concerns.
Zavzemanje za pravno zavezujočo listino, ki jo vsebuje Lizbonska pogodba, je izraz vedno večjega zavedanja, da morajo biti državljani v središču evropske pozornosti.
From the Ombudsman’s perspective, the Charter is groundbreaking in recognising, for the first time, the right to good administration as a fundamental right of Union citizenship (Article 41).
S stališča varuha človekovih pravic je Listina prelomna, saj prvič priznava pravico do dobrega upravljanja kot temeljno pravico državljanstva Unije (člen 41).
Since I took up the post on 1 April 2003, promoting good administration has been an absolute priority for the European Ombudsman.
Odkar sem 1. aprila 2003 prevzel položaj evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, sem si prizadeval predvsem za spodbujanje dobrega upravljanja.
I constantly remind the EU institutions and bodies that good administration requires much more of civil servants than merely avoiding unlawful behaviour.
Institucij e in organe EU nenehno opozarjam, da dobro upravljanje zahteva od javnih uslužbencev veliko več kot samo izogibanje nezakonitemu ravnanju.
O cials must be service-minded and ensure that members of the public are properly treated and enjoy their rights fully.
Uradniki morajo biti vestni in zagotavljati, da se posamezniki primerno obravnavajo, njihove pravice pa v celoti spoštujejo.
This message seems to be producing concrete results.
Zdi se, da to sporočilo daje konkretne rezultate.
I am happy to report that the EU institutions and bodies worked hard in 2007 to resolve complaints, remedy injustices and rectify mistakes.
Z veseljem poročam, da so si institucij e in organi EU v letu 2007 zelo prizadevali za reševanje pritožb ter odpravo krivic in napak.
During the year, we saw a doubling in the number of cases se4 led by the institution concerned — an unprecedented 35% of our inquiries were closed a er the relevant institution agreed to se4 le the ma4 er.
V tem letu se je število primerov, ki so jih rešile zadevne institucije, podvojilo – kar 35 % naših preiskav je bilo zaključenih, ko je zadevna institucij a pristala na poravnavo.
We should not underestimate the importance of this achievement for complainants, and for citizens more generally.
Ne smemo podcenjevati pomena tega dosežka za pritožnike in državljane na splošno.
I firmly believe that we are making significant progress in moving closer to a real culture of service.
Trdno verjamem, da bistveno napredujemo pri doseganju resnične storitvene kulture.
The seven star cases highlighted in this Report bear witness to this change in a4 itude.
Sedem nadvse uspešnih primerov, ki so poudarjeni v tem poročilu, dokazuje ta spremenjeni odnos.
No fewer than four concern the European Commission, which acted quickly and constructively to se4 le a range of grievances.
Kar štirje zadevajo Evropsko komisijo, ki se je odzvala hitro in konstruktivno ter rešila niz pritožb.
I must also single out the European Aviation Safety Agency, which for the second year running has produced a star case, demonstrating its willingness to work constructively with the Ombudsman to resolve problems.
Pohvaliti moram tudi Evropsko agencij o za varnost v letalstvu, ki je že drugo leto zapored ustvarila nadvse uspešen primer in pokazala, da je pripravljena konstruktivno sodelovati z varuhom človekovih pravic pri reševanju težav.
The Council apologised to a complainant a er I brought a language issue to its a4 ention and confirmed its commitment to avoiding similar problems in the future.
Svet se je, potem ko sem ga opozoril na vprašanje jezika, pritožniku opravičil in potrdil, da si bo v prihodnje prizadeval, da bi se izognil podobnim težavam.
Finally, the European Central Bank provided a most helpful reply to a concerned citizen, stressing that it a4 ached great importance to clarification of the issues she had raised and inviting her to address any further questions to its experts.
Nazadnje, Evropska centralna banka je zaskrbljeni državljanki nadvse uslužno in koristno odgovorila ter poudarila, da je razjasnitev zadev, na katere jo je državljanka opozorila, za banko zelo pomembna, ter državljanko pozvala, naj vsa dodatna vprašanja naslovi na njene strokovnjake.
My intention in highlighting these cases is to present models of good administration for all EU institutions and bodies to take inspiration from and to measure their own practices against.
S poudarjanjem teh primerov želim predstaviti modele dobrega upravljanja za vse institucij e in organe EU, iz katerih lahko ti črpajo navdih in s katerimi lahko primerjajo svoje prakse.
I will continue in 2008 to encourage the careful nurturing of a culture of service in order to meet citizens’ expectations.
V letu 2008 bom še naprej spodbujal skrben razvoj storitvene kulture, da bomo zadovoljili pričakovanja državljanov.
Some of the results that we obtained for citizens and that are documented in this Report were achieved without a formal exchange of correspondence with the institution.
Nekateri rezultati, ki smo jih dosegli za državljane in so navedeni v tem poročilu, so bili doseženi brez uradnega dopisovanja z institucijo.
We have now reached a stage where our relations with the institutions are such that we can solve a growing number of cases rapidly, avoiding the need for a lengthy inquiry.
Dosegli smo tako raven odnosov z institucijami, da lahko hitro rešujemo vedno večje število primerov in se izognemo dolgotrajnim preiskavam.
I have begun to make wider use of more informal procedures to help resolve problems in a flexible way and will continue to develop this approach in 2008.
Začel sem uporabljati čedalje več neformalnih postopkov, da bi pripomogel k prožnemu reševanju težav, in ta pristop bom razvijal tudi v letu 2008.
To me, this marks a watershed for our institution, proving the extent to which the Ombudsman is respected and the institutions are keen to help the citizen.
Menim, da je to prelomnica za našo institucijo, kar dokazuje, kolikšno je spoštovanje varuha človekovih pravic in koliko so institucij e pripravljene pomagati državljanom.
To be sure, problems remain.
Težave seveda ostajajo.
Once again in 2007, 15% of cases were closed with a critical remark because the institution concerned failed to live up to the standards of service that citizens are entitled to receive.
Tudi v letu 2007 je bilo 15 % primerov zaključenih s kritično pripombo, ker zadevne institucij e pri storitvah niso dosegle standardov, do katerih so državljani upravičeni.
Examples of these cases are included in this Report.
Nekaj takih primerov je vključenih v to poročilo.
ANNUAL REPORT 2007 refusing to change its recruitment procedures, essentially for reasons of its own administrative convenience, to another excessively delaying an infringement procedure without o� ering any specific explanations as to why.
LETNO POROČILO 2007 institucij a čezmerno odlašala postopek za ugotavljanje kršitve, ne da bi za to zagotovila ustrezno obrazložitev.
We will again produce a followup report to these critical remarks in 2008 to ensure that the institutions learn from them.
Leta 2008 bomo spet pripravili poročilo o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi s temi kritičnimi pripombami, da bi zagotovili, da se institucij e iz njih kaj naučijo.
I also intend to explore ways of making the Ombudsman’s decisions easier to understand, so that they can be even more e� ective in providing guidance, for both citizens and o cials, on what constitutes good administration.
Nameravam tudi preučiti, kako bi lahko poenostavil razumevanje odločitev varuha človekovih pravic, da bi bile še učinkovitejše pri usmerjanju državljanov in uradnikov glede tega, kaj pomeni dobro upravljanje.
It is clear that there is still work to be done in promoting the principles of good administration within the EU institutions and bodies.
Seveda delo pri spodbujanju načel dobrega upravljanja v institucijah in organih EU še ni končano.
To help develop useful strategies in this regard, I convened a workshop in Brussels in November 2007 which saw a lively exchange of views on how the European Ombudsman can help make the right to good administration a reality.
Da bi prispeval k razvoju uporabnih strategij v zvezi s tem, sem novembra 2007 v Bruslju sklical delavnico, na kateri je potekala živahna izmenjava mnenj o tem, kako lahko evropski varuh človekovih pravic prispeva k uresničitvi pravice do dobrega upravljanja.
The discussions brought forward many stimulating and innovative ideas for the years ahead.
Razprave so obrodile številne spodbudne in inovativne zamisli za prihodnja leta.
I look forward to pu4 ing them into practice for the benefit of citizens throughout Europe.
Veselim se njihovega praktičnega udejanjanja v korist državljanov po vsej Evropi.
Be 4 er communication
Boljše obveščanje javnosti
I ended my introduction to the 2006 Annual Report by highlighting my dual aim for the year ahead, namely, working with the institutions to promote good administration and refocusing my communication e� orts so that all those who might need to make use of the European Ombudsman’s services are properly informed of how to do so.
Uvod v letno poročilo 2006 sem sklenil tako, da sem poudaril svoj dvojni cilj za naslednje leto, in sicer sodelovati z institucijami pri spodbujanju dobrega upravljanja in preusmeriti prizadevanja pri obveščanju javnosti, da bodo lahko vsi, ki bodo morda potrebovali storitve evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, ustrezno obveščeni, kako naj to storijo. o.
With regard to this second aim, 2007 was a landmark year.
Leto 2007 je bilo prelomno leto, kar zadeva drugi cilj.
We finally turned the corner in terms of the rate of admissible complaints.
Končno smo premagali težave zaradi deleža dopustnih pritožb.
Thanks to an ambitious and carefully targeted information campaign, the number of admissible complaints increased in both absolute and relative terms compared to 2006.
Zaradi ambiciozne in skrbno usmerjene informativne kampanje se je število dopustnih pritožb v primerjavi z letom 2006 absolutno in relativno povečalo.
As a result, 17% more inquiries were opened during the year on the basis of complaints received.
Posledično je bilo med letom na podlagi prejetih pritožb sproženih 17 % več novih preiskav.
At the same time, as a result of our e� orts to improve information to citizens about what the European Ombudsman can and cannot do, more citizens than ever were helped to fi find appropriate means of redress at the national, regional and local levels.
Hkrati smo s prizadevanji za boljše obveščanje državljanov o tem, kaj lahko stori evropski varuh človekovih pravic in česa ne more, pomagali več državljanom kot kdaj koli prej, da so našli ustrezna pravna sredstva na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni.
A key development in this regard in 2007 was the adoption of the European Network of Ombudsmen Statement.
Ključni dosežek na tem področju v letu 2007 je bilo sprejetje izjave Evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic.
The aim of the Statement is to make the EU dimension of the work of ombudsmen be4 er known and to clarify the service that members of the Network provide to people who complain about ma4 ers within the scope of EU law.
Cilj izjave je izboljšati obveščenost o razsežnosti dela varuhov človekovih pravic, povezani z EU, in podrobneje pojasniti storitve, ki jih člani mreže zagotavljajo ljudem, ki se pritožujejo zaradi zadev znotraj zakonodaje EU.
The Statement is available on the European Ombudsman’s website in all EU o cial languages and is reproduced in full in Chapter 5 of this Report.
Izjava je na voljo na spletni strani evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v vseh uradnih jezikih EU in je v celoti navedena v poglavju 5 tega poročila.
Members of the Network will work proactively to promote awareness of the Statement and thus to ensure that citizens understand who is best placed to resolve their EU law-related complaints.
Člani mreže si bodo dejavno prizadevali za pospeševanje ozaveščenosti o izjavi in tako zagotovili, da bodo državljani obveščeni o tem, kdo je najprimernejši za reševanje njihovih pritožb, povezanih z zakonodajo EU.
A further important initiative in this area should come to fruition in 2008.
Leta 2008 naj bi se na tem področju uresničila še ena pomembna pobuda.
Over the past year, my o ce has been developing an interactive guide that will be launched in the coming year as part of the Ombudsman’s new website.
Lani je moj urad pripravljal interaktivni vodnik, ki bo začel delovati naslednje leto kot del nove spletne strani varuha človekovih pravic.
This key feature will help citizens find the most appropriate avenue of redress for their grievances.
Državljani si bodo z njim pomagali pri iskanju najustreznejše poti za reševanje svojih pritožb.
The guide should enable a greater proportion of complainants to address directly the body best equipped to deal with their complaint.
Vodnik naj bi omogočil večjemu deležu pritožnikov, da pritožbo naslovijo neposredno na organ, ki je najbolje usposobljen za njeno obravnavo.