natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The fact is that, just as for the policy as a whole, the effectiveness of each oftheprogrammesisdifficultto measureifpreciseobjectivesand indicators have not been definedin advanceinthelight of a clearly establishedinitialsituation.
Dejstvo je, da je uspešnost posameznih programov tako kot uspešnost politike v celoti težko meriti, če natančni cilji in kazalniki niso vnaprej določeni ob upoštevanjujasno opredeljenega prvotnegastanja.
Moreover, some of the evaluation reports mentioned above have already pointed out shortcomings relating to the lack of a strategy and specific, measurable objectives for the various programmes (see Box 10).
Poleg tega so bile v nekaterih prej omenjenih poročilih o ocenjevanju žeizpostavljeneslabosti vzvezis pomanjkanjemstrategijeter kon-kretnihin merljivih ciljev zarazlične programe(glej okvir 10).
EXTRACTS FROM EVALUATION REPORTS CONCERNING SHORTCOMINGS IN PROGRAMMESIN TERMS OF DEFINING A STRATEGY AND SPECIFIC, MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES
IZVLEČKIIZ OCENJEVALNIH POROČIL GLEDE SLABOSTI PROGRAMOV V ZVEZI Z OPREDELITVIJO STRATEGIJE TER KONKRETNIHIN MERLJIVIH CILJEV
• ‘The programmes of the sample are in line with the regulations. […] They have however some design shortcomings in the sense that objectives are rarely quantified and are not structured hierarchically; furthermore the underlying strategies are poorly described.’
• Programi iz vzorca so skladni z zakonodajo. […] Vendar imajo nekatere pomanjkljivosti v zasnovi, saj so cilji le redko količinsko opredeljeni in niso hierarhično razvrščeni; poleg tega so z njimi povezane strategije slabo opisane.
• ‘[…] formulation of the programmes’ objectives by the proposing organisation appears in many cases like a formal exercise rather than a real attempt to design an appropriate strategy.’
• […] v več primerihse zdi, da oblikovanje ciljev programa za organizacijo pomeni zgoljformalni postopek in ne resničen poskus zasnove ustrezne strategije.
SELECTION OF THEIMPLEMENTING BODIES
IZBIRAIZVAJALSKIH ORGANOV
The implementing body plays a key role in carrying out the programme, sothatany weaknessincheckingthe wayitisselectedislikelyto haveaneffecton whether the programme is regular, effective and economic.Thisriskisallthegreater whentheproposingorganisa-tions’ minimum co-financing shareislow and sothe directfinancial stakes involved for the beneficiaries whoselecttheimplementing body arelimited.
Izvajalski organ ima ključno vlogo pri izvedbi programa, kar pomeni, da lahko vsaka slabost pri pregledu izbirnega postopka vpliva tudi na pravilnost, uspešnost in gospodarnost. To tveganje je še toliko pomembnejše,kadarje minimalni delež organizacije predlagateljice pri sofinanciranju majhenin so zato s tem povezani neposredni finančniizzivi za upravičence, kiizberejoizvajalski organ, omejeni.
Itis basically uptothe Member Stateto checkthe wayin whichthe proposing organisation selects the implementing body.
Za preverjanje, kako organizacija predlagateljica izbere izvajalski organ, je odgovorna država članica.
The checking procedures in use in the three Member States visited, and especially in Spain and Italy, however, were not sufficiently formal and systematic to make it possible to ascertain whether the choice did indeed result from actually‘inviting competitive offers by all appropriate means’.
Vendar postopki, ki so se pri pregledih uporabljali v treh obiskanih državah članicah, zlasti v Španiji in Italiji, niso bili dovolj formalni in sistematični, da bi bilo mogoče ugotoviti, ali je izbira tudi resnično temeljila na „natečajnem postopku z ustreznimi sredstvi“.
Forafourth Member State, the Court also found a case wherethe information available showed that the proposing organisation had not complied withtheterms of selectionto whichit had committed itself and raised questions as to the transparency of the final choice.
Sodišče je pri četrti državi članici odkrilo tudi primer, pri katerem so razpoložljive informacije pokazale, da organizacija predlagateljica ni upoštevala izbirnih pogojev, ki jih je sprejela, zaradi česar je bila preglednost končne izbire vprašljiva.
Not one ofthese points had, however, been previously detected.
Vendar nobena od teh zadev ni bila odkrita med obravnavo dosjeja.
ILLUSTRATION OF THE CONDITIONS FOR SELECTING SOMEIMPLEMENTING BODIES
PONAZORITEV POGOJEV ZAIZBOR NEKATERIHIZVAJALSKIH ORGANOV
In Italy, the average period of time noted by the auditors between the call for proposals being sent to possible service providers and the final selection of the implementing body was less than 10 working days.
V Italiji so revizorji opazili, da je med razpisom za oddajo predlogov, ki je bil poslan možnim izvajalskim organom, in končnim izborom izvajalskega organa povprečno preteklo manj kot 10 delovnih dni.
Spanish legislation lays down a standard time limit of 15 days for the receipt of tenders from service providers as part of a public call for tenders.
Španska zakonodaja v okviru javnih razpisov določa standardni rok 15 dni za prejem ponudb od ponudnikov storitev.
For several ofthe programmes examinedinthe various Member States,theimplementing body had been selected on the basis of examining one single service tender.
Pri več preučenih programih v različnih državah članicah je bil izvajalski organ izbran na podlagi pregleda samo ene ponudbe storitev.
As regards the procedures for selecting the service provider, very tight deadlinesforinvitationstotender wereinsome cases noted, which could hinder the presentation of tenders under proper conditions.
Glede postopkov za izbor izvajalskega organa so bili v nekaterih primerih prirazpisihzaoddajo ponudbopaženizelokratkiroki,kar bilahko oteževalo predložitev dobro pripravljenih ponudb.
In certain cases, the service provider may even be selected on the basis of asingletenderreceived(see Box 11).
V določenih pri-merihje mogoče izvajalski organ izbrati celo na podlagi ene same prejete ponudbe(glej okvir 11).
MONITORING OF EXPENDITURE STEPPED UP BY THE COMMISSION
KOMISIJA JE OKREPILA SVOJE SPREMLJANJE ODHODKOV
10For example, a two-year programme starting on 17 April of year N will have its expenditure approved for the two periods running from 17 April N to 16 April N + 1 (Year 1) and from 17 April N + 1 to 16 April N + 2 (Year 2); these are periods which coincide neither with the EAGF financial years nor with those of the other programmes.
10Na primer, pri dveletnem programu, ki se je začel 17. aprila leta N, bodo njegovi odhodki odobreni za dve obdobji, in sicer od 17. aprila leta N do 16. aprila leta N+1 (1. leto) in od 17. aprila leta N+1 do 16. aprila leta N+2 (2. leto); ti obdobji ne sovpadata s proračunskima letoma EKJS ne s proračunskimi leti drugih programov.
For the last two years the Commission has been introducing or strengthening procedures and tools for its day-to-day monitoring of Member States’ programmes and payment claims.
Komisija je v zadnjih dveh letih uvedla ali okrepila postopke in orodja za tekoče spremljanje programov in zahtevkov za plačila držav članic.
This has enabled it to detect andstartrectifyinga number ofadministrativeanomaliesthat pre-viouslyexisted: moresystematicacquisition ofthecase documents required by the regulations, administrative closure of programmes completed several years ago, detection of errors that haveled some Member States to charge to certain programmes payment claims higherthanthe amounts approved.
Zato je lahko odkrila in začela popravljati številne administrativne nepravilnosti, ki so bile prisotne v preteklosti: bolj sistematično pridobivanje dokumentov, ki jih zahtevajo uredbe, administrativno zaključevanje programov, ki so se iztekli pred leti, odkrivanje napak, zaradi katerih so nekatere države članice pri določenih programih knjižile zahtevke za plačilo, višje od odobrenih zneskov.
Despitethe progressthat has been made,thetoolsin place are still undergoingimprovement, whichis whysomeresidualproblemsof the type described in the previous paragraph were still being uncovered during the audit.
Vzpostavljena orodja so kljub doseženemu napredku trenutno še vedno vprocesuizboljševanja,zatosobili medrevizijoševednoodkriti nekateri problemi, podobni tistim iz prejšnjega odstavka.
Furthermore, the principle of approving annual budgets on the basis of the anniversary date specific to each programme10 hampers effective(budgetary) year-by-year checks onthe booked expenditure.
Poleg tega načelo odobritve letnih proračunov na podlagi istega datuma za vsak posamezni program10 ovira uspešne letne (proračunske) preglede knjiženih odhodkov.
EXAMPLES OF SUBJECTIVE ELEMENTS TO BE TAKENINTO ACCOUNT IN THE NATURE OF THE MESSAGES
PRIMERI SUBJEKTIVNIH DEJAVNIKOV, KIJIHJE TREBA UPOŠTEVATI PRI NARAVI SPOROČIL
One‘Poultry’ programme used promotion materialthat providedtheinformationstipulated bythe regulations, but most of the expenditure incurred had been devoted to radio or television advertising spots which bore no relation to ‘the intrinsic qualities of the product concerned or its characteristics’ or to the objectives and main messages of the ‘poultrymeat’ guidelines.
Pri enem programu perutnine je bil uporabljen promocijski material, v katerem so bile navedene informacije, ki jih določajo uredbe, vendar je bila večina nastalih odhodkov namenjena za radijske ali televizijske oglase, ki niso imeli nobene zveze z resničnimi lastnostmi ali značilnostmi proizvoda ali s cilji in glavnimi sporočili smernic za perutninsko meso.
Twosuccessive‘Wine’ programmes presentedslogans and visual advertisements which had highly commercial connotations and had nothing to do with ‘the intrinsic qualities of the product concerned or its characteristics’.
V dveh zaporednih programih vina so bili predstavljeni slogani in podobe, ki so bili zelo komercialno naravnani in niso imeli nikakršne zveze z resničnimi lastnostmi ali značilnostmi proizvoda.
No 1071/2005 and (EC) No 1346/2005.
Člena 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 1071/2005 in Uredbe (ES) št. 1346/2005.
As regards the actual content of the programmes, the eligibility conditions specifiedin the regulations are sometimes subject tointerpre-tation.In particular,theregulations11 stipulatethat‘allinformation and/or promotion messages […] shall be based on the intrinsic qualities of the product concerned or its characteristics’ and this criterion leaves great scope for interpretation.
Glede dejanske vsebine programovsije v uredbah določene pogoje zaupravičenostvčasih mogoče različno razlagati.
It is therefore sometimes difficult to strike an acceptable balance between messages that directly satisfy the criteria of the regulation and more commercial promotion techniques(see Box 12).
To natančneje pomeni, da uredbe11 določajo, da vsa informativna ali promocijska sporočila […] temeljijo na resničnih lastnostih ali značilnostih proizvoda, to merilopadopuščaveliko možnostizarazlago.Zatoje včasih težko vzpostaviti sprejemljivo ravnovesje medsporočili,ki neposredno izpolnjujejo merila iz uredbe, in bolj komercialnimi načini promocije(glej okvir 12).
PERSISTENT WEAKNESSESIN THE CHECKS BY SOME MEMBER STATES
V NEKATERIH DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH SO ŠE VEDNO SLABOSTI V PREGLEDIH
The audits performed in Spain and Italy enabled the Court to follow up the managementandcontrolproblems whichhadbeenidentified by the Commission for several years and had alreadyled to financial corrections being made as a result of procedures initiated in 2005.
Sodiščejelahkozrevizijami v Španiji in Italiji spremljalo težave pri upravljanju in nadzoru, ki jih Komisija ugotavlja že več let in so že povzročile finančne popravke po postopkih, začetih leta 2005.
In both Member States it was apparent that the administrative practices still did not suffice to ensure that the management and control of the programmes met the regulatory requirements.
V obeh državah članicah seje pokazalo, da administrativne prakse še vedno ne zadoščajo za zagotavljanje skladnosti upravljanja in nadziranja programov z uredbenimi zahtevami.
Shortcomings ofthe same kind as those identified by the Commission in 2005 (significant weaknesses in checks, failure to abide bythetimelimitsstipulated intheregulations,casesofthe maximum Community contribution of 50 % being exceeded) werefoundin particular.
Odkrite so bile predvsem podobne pomanjkljivosti, kot jih je Komisija ugotovila leta 2005 (bistvene slabosti v pregledih, neupoštevanje v uredbah določenihrokov, primeri preseganja največjega dovoljenega prispevka Skupnosti v višini 50 %).
In Spain, the administrative verification tasks were not carried out in asufficiently well-documented mannertoberecognisedandthe deadlines were often exceeded. The Spanish authoritiesthemselves had found on several occasions that the system of checksin place to date was not ableto guaranteethatthe expenditurecomplied with theregulations.
V Španiji naloge administrativnega preverjanja niso bile dovolj dobro dokumentirane, da bijihlahko priznali,roki paso bili pogosto pre-koračeni.Španski organi oblastisosamivečkrat ugotovili, davzpo-stavljeni sistem pregledov ni mogel zagotoviti skladnosti odhodkov z uredbami.
In Italy, the checks required by the Community regulations were often not carried out by the authorities and the administrative practices did not ensurethat payments were made within acceptable periods oftime.Internalcontrol weaknesses werefoundattheproposing organisations and at the implementing bodies as regards their ability toensurethetraceability of expenditure and a satisfactory level of information provision.
V Italiji organi oblasti pogosto niso izvajali pregledov, ki jih zahtevajo uredbe Skupnosti, administrativne prakse pa niso zagotavljale spoštovanja sprejemljivih plačilnih rokov. V organizacijah predlagateljicah in izvajalskih organih so bile odkrite slabosti v notranjem kontroliranju, in sicer glede njihovih zmožnosti za zagotavljanje sledljivosti odhodkovin zadovoljivestopnjeinformiranja.
In both these countries it was also found that the effectiveness of the checks could be further curtailed in cases where considerable use was made of subcontractors or intermediaries.
V obeh državah je bilo prav tako ugotovljeno, da bi bila lahko uspešnost pregledov dodatno omejenav primerih,kjersovvečji merisodelo-vali podizvajalci ali posredniki.
In some of these cases, the Court’sauditors were not given access to all the supporting documents they askedfor.
V nekaterih od teh primerov revizorji Sodišča niso mogli pridobiti vseh dokazil, za kateraso zaprosili.
In both Spain and Italy, action had just been taken, however, to address the problems that had been found for more than four years.
Tako v Španiji kot Italiji so šele sedaj začeli ukrepati, da bi odpravili težave, kiso bile odkrite pred več kotštirimileti.
Nevertheless, at the time of the audit it wasstilltooearlytoverify whether thesechanges had been effectiveandsothis willtherefore haveto be ascertainedinthefuture.
Kljubtemuje bilo medrevizijoše vedno prezgodaj, da bilahko preverili, aliso bilete spremembe uspešne, zato bo na potrditevtrebaše počakati.
The audit conducted in France found practices which, whilst still requiring improvement or systematic application in some respects, were much morein keeping with expected practice.
Med revizijo v Franciji so bile opažene prakse, ki jih je sicer v določenih pogledih še treba izboljšati ali sistematično uporabljati, vendar so bile velikoskladnejšes pričakovano prakso.
The Commission has for some years been improving the management and control arrangements for expenditure connected withinformation provision and promotion measures for agricultural products.
Komisija že nekajletizboljšuje upravljavskein nadzorne ureditve za odhodkevzveziz ukrepizainformiranje okmetijskih proizvodihin njihovo promocijo.
Through this process, positive results have already been obtained in some areas butitstill needsto be further consolidated and expanded, in particular with the prospect of the budget devoted to these arrangements beingincreased.
Ta proces je na nekaterih področjih že prinesel pozitivne rezultate, vendar ga je treba še dodatno konsolidirati in razširiti, zlasti kerse bo proračun zatasistem verjetno kmalu povečal.
The Court has found that the system in place does not make it possible to gauge the effectiveness of the measure.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da vzpostavljeni sistem ne omogoča merjenja uspešnostiukrepov.
Theimpact of the policy, although it is probably positive, is currently difficult to measure, one of the contributory factors being that there are no specific objectives based on an explicit strategy which can serve as a yardstick for evaluating the effectiveness of the policy and monitoring the appropriate indicators (see paragraphs 16 to 18).
Učinek politike, ki je sicer verjetno pozitiven, jetrenutnotežkoizmeriti, ker med drugim ni konkretnih ciljev, ki bi temeljili na izrecno določeni strategiji in bi jih lahko uporabili kot merilo za ocenjevanje uspešnosti politike ter za spremljanje ustreznih kazalnikov (glej odstavke 16 do 18).
The impact to be expected from the promotion scheme is nevertheless circumscribed by a budget thatisrelatively modestinrelationtothelarge number of products and geographical areas to be covered and the lack of an adequate procedure for ensuring complementarity withthevariousnational or private promotion measures(see paragraphs 19to 23).
Kljub temu je pričakovani učinek omejen, ker je proračun glede na veliko število proizvodov in geografskih območij, kijih mora pokriti,relativnoskromenin ker ni ustreznega postopka za zagotavljanje dopolnjevanja z različnimi nacionalnimi ali zasebnimi ukrepi za promocijo (glej odstavke 19 do 23).
The Court therefore expresses the following recommendations regarding these points:
Sodišče zato zate zadeve podaja naslednja priporočila:
(a)The policy objectives need to be specified whilst at the same time ensuring that the stated ambitions are commensurate withthe budgetsthat have been committed.
(a)Cilji politike morajo bitijasno določeni, hkrati pa je treba zagotoviti, da so želje sorazmerne z dodeljenimi proračunskimi sredstvi.
(b)These objectives should be expressed as ‘SMART’ objectives so that suitable performanceindicators can be defined and monitored.
(b)Ti cilji bi morali biti oblikovani v obliki SMART, tako da je mogoče opredeliti ustrezne kazalnike uspešnostiinjihspremljati.
(c)A formal procedure for consulting all the stakeholders should be introducedsoasto ensurethat, duringthe whole process,from defining the strategy through to implementing the procedures, thereiscomplementarity withthevariouspromotion measures thatalreadyexist.
(c) Uvesti bi bilo treba formalni postopek za posvetovanje z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, ki bi v celotnem procesu, torej od opredelitve strategije do izvajanja postopkov, zagotovil dopolnjevanje z različnimi že obstoječimi ukrepi za promocijo.
Withthisin mind, the Commission should in particular encouragethe Member Statestosystematically notify it ofthe various promotion aids and measuresin use nationally.
Komisija bi morala ob upoštevanju tega države članice spodbujati predvsem k temu, dajosistematično obveščajo orazličnih podporahin ukrepihza promocijo, kiseizvajajo na nacionalniravni.
As regards selecting the programmes to be co-financed, the Commission’s selectivity has considerably increased in recent years (see paragraphs 34to 38).This progress nevertheless needsto becontinued both at the Commission (see paragraphs 37 to 40) and in the Member States (see paragraphs 31 to 33).
Pri izboru programov za sofinanciranje je Komisija v zadnjih letih postala bistveno bolj selektivna (glej odstavke 34 do 38). Vendar se mora ta napredek nadaljevatitako v Komisiji(glej odstavke 37 do 40) kot v državah članicah (glej odstavke 31 do 33).
The Court thus has the following recommendations:
Sodišče zato podaja naslednji priporočili:
Asregardstheimplementation ofthe programmes and the legality/regularity of the expenditure, the checks madeontheselectionof theimplementing bodies, which have a key role to play, are still too limited (see paragraphs 41 to 43).
Glede izvajanja programov in zakonitosti/pravilnosti odhodkov je nadzor nad izborom izvajalskih organov, ki imajo ključno vlogo, še vedno preveč omejen(glej odstavke 41 do 43).
The Commission’s subsequent monitoring of expenditure has indeed been stepped up (see paragraphs 44 to 46), but significant control weaknesses persistin certain Member States(see paragraphs 47to 52). The Courttherefore makes the following recommendations:
Komisijaje sicer okrepila svoje poznejšespremljanje odhodkov(glej odstavke44 do46),vendarse v določenih državah članicah še naprej pojavljajo bistvene slabosti pri nadzoru(glej odstavke47 do52).Sodiščezato podaja naslednji priporočili:
(a)Checks on the selection of implementing bodies should be stepped up.
(a) Preglede postopkov izbiranja izvajalskih organov bi bilo treba okrepiti.
(b) Control weaknesses identified in one Member State should be followed up so as to ensure speedy improvement in these shortcomings.
(b) Glede slabosti v kontroliranju, odkritih v eni državi članici, bi bilo treba nadalje ukrepati, da se zagotovi hitra odprava teh pomanjkljivosti.
When considering the impact to be expected from implementing the Court’s recommendations, the size of the budget devoted to the promotion arrangements needsto be borne in mind.
Pri obravnavi pričakovanega učinka izvajanja priporočil Sodišča je treba upoštevati velikost proračuna, namenjenega za sistem promocije. Komisijata sistemtrenutno poglobljeno preučuje.
Thiscouldin particular lead to a proposal to significantly increase the information and promotion budget.
Posledicatega bi lahko bil predlog za precejšnje povečanje pororačuna za informiranje in promocijo.
Forthatreason,the Courtrecommendsthat theseimprovements be made assoon as possible.
Sodišče zato priporoča, da se te izboljšave uvedejo čim prej.
This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 11June 2009.
To poročilojesprejelo Računsko sodišče v Luxembourgu nasvojem zasedanju dne 11.junija 2009.
SUMMARY OF THE REGULATIONSIN FORCE DURING THE PERIOD AUDITED
POVZETEK VELJAVNIH UREDB V REVIDIRANEM OBDOBJU
Council
Vrsta ukrepa
Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 of 17 December 2007 on information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products on the internal market and in third countries(OJ L 3, 5.1.2008, p. 1)
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 3/2008 z dne 17. decembra 2007 o ukrepih za informiranje o kmetijskih proizvodih in njihovo promocijo na notranjem trgu in v tretjih državah (UL L 3, 5.1.2008, str. 1).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 501/2008 of 5 June 2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 3/2008 on information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products on the internal market and in third countries (OJ L 147, 6.6.2008, p. 3)
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 501/2008 z dne 5. junija 2008 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3/2008 o ukrepih za informiranje o kmetijskih proizvodih in njihovo promocijo na notranjem trgu in v tretjih državah (UL L 147, 6.6.2008, str. 3).
NB: amalgamation of the two previous regulations without any change in the content.
Opomba: združitev prejšnjih dveh uredb brez vsebinskih sprememb.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1071/2005 of 1 July 2005 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market (OJ L 179, 11.7.2005, p. 1)
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1071/2005 z dne 1. julija 2005 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2826/2000 o akcijah informiranja in promocije za kmetijske proizvode na notranjem trgu (UL L 179, 11.7.2005, str. 1).
Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 of 19 December 2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market(OJ L 328, 23.12.2000, p. 2)
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2826/2000 z dne 19. decembra 2000 o akcijah informiranja in promocije za kmetijske proizvode na notranjem trgu (UL L 328, 23.12 2000, str.
(Amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2060/2004 (OJ L 357, 2.12.2004, p.
2),kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2060/2004 (UL L 357, 2.12.2004, str.
3) and by Council Regulation (EC) No 1182/2007 (OJ L 273, 17.10.2007, p. 1))
3) in Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1182/2007 (UL L 273, 17.10.2007, str. 1).