natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Member States shall adopt all measures necessary to ensure that, before consent is given, projects likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue, inter alia, of their nature, size or location are made subject to an assessment with regard to their effects.
Države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se pred izdajo soglasja za izvedbo presodijo vplivi projektov, ki bodo, med drugim zaradi svoje narave, velikosti ali lokacije, verjetno pomembno vplivali na okolje.
The environmental impact assessment may be integrated into the existing pro -cedures for consent to projects in the Member States, or, failing this, into other procedures or into procedures to be established to comply with the aims of this Directive.
Presojo vplivov na okolje se lahko vključi v obstoječe postopke za izdajo soglasja za izvedbo projektov v državah članicah, oziroma, če to ne gre, v druge postopke ali v postopke, ki se jih mora uvesti za usklajevanje s cilji te direktive.
Member States may, in exceptional cases, exempt a specific project in whole or in part from the provisions laid down in this Directive.’
Države članice lahko v izjemnih primerih določen projekt v celoti ali delno izvzamejo iz določb, ki jih določa ta direktiva.“
Article 3 of Directive 85/337 provides:
V členu 3 Direktive 85/337 je določeno:
— the interaction between the factors mentioned in the first and second indents,
– medsebojn[e] vpliv[e] dejavnikov, navedenih v prvi in drugi alineji,
Article 4 of that directive is worded as follows:
V členu 4 navedene direktive je določeno:
Article 5 of Directive 85/337 states:
V členu 5 Direktive 85/337 je določeno:
In the case of projects which, pursuant to Article 4, must be subjected to an environmental impact assessment in accordance with Articles 5 to 10, Member States shall adopt the necessary measures to ensure that the developer supplies in an appropriate form the information specified in Annex III inasmuch as:
V primeru projektov, pri katerih se mora po členu 4 presoditi vpliv na okolje v skladu s členi 5 do 10, države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, ki zagotovijo, da nosilec projekta v primerni obliki priskrbi informacije, določene v Prilogi III, [če]:
(a) the Member States consider that the information is relevant to a given stage of the consent procedure and to the specific characteristics of a particular project or type of project and of the environmental features likely to be affected;
(a) države članice menijo, da so te informacije pomembne za dano stopnjo postopka izdaje soglasja in za specifične značilnosti določenega projekta ali vrste projekta in za lastnosti okolja, na katere bo projekt verjetno vplival;
— a description of the project comprising information on the site, design and size of the project,
– opis projekta, ki obsega informacije o lokaciji, zasnovi in velikosti projekta,
— a description of the measures envisaged in order to avoid, reduce and, if possible, remedy significant adverse effects,
– opis predvidenih ukrepov, da bi se izognili pomembnim �kodljivim vplivom, jih zmanj�ali in po možnosti odpravili,
— the data required to identify and assess the main effects which the project is likely to have on the environment,
– podatke za potrebe opredelitve in presojo glavnih verjetnih vplivov projekta na okolje,
— a non-technical summary of the information mentioned in indents 1 to 3.
– netehnični povzetek informacij, navedenih v alinejah 1 do 3.
Where they consider it necessary, Member States shall ensure that any authorities with relevant information in their possession make this information available to the developer.’
Kjer menijo, da je potrebno, države članice zagotovijo, da bodo vsi organi, ki imajo ustrezne informacije, dali te informacije na razpolago nosilcu projekta.“
Article 6 of Directive 85/337 is worded as follows:
V členu 6 Direktive 85/337 je določeno:
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the authorities likely to be concerned by the project by reason of their specific environmental responsibilities are given an opportunity to express their opinion on the request for development consent.
Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da imajo organi, ki bodo verjetno obravnavali projekt zaradi svojih posebnih okoljskih odgovornosti, možnost izraziti svoje mnenje o pro�nji za soglasje za izvedbo.
Member States shall designate the authorities to be consulted for this purpose in general terms or in each case when the request for consent is made.
Države članice določijo organe, s katerimi se posvetuje v ta namen na splo�no ali v vsakem posameznem primeru, ko se poda zahteva za soglasje za izvedbo.
The information gathered pursuant to Article 5 shall be forwarded to these authorities.
Informacije, zbrane skladno s členom 5, se posredujejo tem organom.
Detailed arrangements for consultation shall be laid down by the Member States.
Podrobnej�e ureditve posvetovanja določijo države članice.
— any request for development consent and any information gathered pursuant to Article 5 are made available to the public,
– bodo vse pro�nje za soglasje za izvedbo in vse informacije, zbrane skladno s členom 5, dane na razpolago javnosti,
— the public concerned is given the opportunity to express an opinion before the project is initiated.
– bo imela zadevna javnost možnost izraziti mnenje pred začetkom izvedbe projekta.“
Article 7 of Directive 85/337 provides:
V členu 7 Direktive 85/337 je določeno:
‘Where a Member State is aware that a project is likely to have significant effects on the environment in another Member State or where a Member State likely to be significantly affected so requests, the Member State in whose territory the project is intended to be carried out shall forward the information gathered pursuant to Article 5 to the other Member State at the same time as it makes it available to its own nationals.
„Če se država članica zaveda, da bo projekt verjetno pomembno vplival na okolje v drugi državi članici, ali kjer tako zahteva država članica, ki bo verjetno znatno prizadeta, država članica, na katere ozemlju se namerava izvajati projekt, posreduje informacije, zbrane skladno s členom 5, drugi državi članici istočasno, kot jih da na razpolago svojim državljanom.
Such information shall serve as a basis for any consultations necessary in the framework of the bilateral relations between two Member States on a reciprocal and equivalent basis.’
Take informacije služijo kot temelj za vse potrebne posvete v okviru dvostranskih odnosov med dvema državama članicama na vzajemni in enakovredni podlagi.“
Article 8 of Directive 85/337 states:
V členu 8 Direktive 85/337 je določeno:
‘Information gathered pursuant to Articles 5, 6 and 7 must be taken into consideration in the development consent procedure.’
„Informacije, zbrane skladno s členi 5, 6 in 7, se morajo upo�tevati v postopku za pridobitev soglasja za izvedbo.“
Article 9 of that directive is worded as follows:
V členu 9 navedene direktive je določeno:
‘When a decision has been taken, the competent authority or authorities shall inform the public concerned of:
„Ko je posamezna odločitev sprejeta, pristojni organi obvestijo zadevno javnost o:
— the content of the decision and any conditions attached thereto,
– vsebini odločitve in vseh pogojih, ki iz nje izhajajo,
— the reasons and considerations on which the decision is based where the Member States’ legislation so provides.
– vzrokih in premislekih, na katerih temelji odločitev, kjer zakonodaja držav članic tako določa.
The detailed arrangements for such information shall be determined by the Member States.
Podrobne postopke glede takih informacij določijo države članice.
If another Member State has been informed pursuant to Article 7, it will also be informed of the decision in question.’
Če je bila skladno s členom 7 obve�čena �e kak�na država članica, bo obve�čena tudi o zadevni odločitvi.“
Article 10 of that directive provides:
V členu 10 navedene direktive je določeno:
‘The provisions of this Directive shall not affect the obligation on the competent authorities to respect the limitations imposed by national regulations and administrative provisions and accepted legal practices with regard to industrial and commercial secrecy and the safeguarding of the public interest.
„Določbe te direktive ne vplivajo na obveznost pristojnih organov, da upo�tevajo omejitve, ki jih nalagajo nacionalni zakonski in upravni predpisi ter priznane pravne prakse, kar zadeva industrijsko in poslovno skrivnost in varovanje javnega interesa.
Where Article 7 applies, the transmission of information to another Member State and the reception of information by another Member State shall be subject to the limitations in force in the Member State in which the project is proposed.’
Kjer se uporablja člen 7, za posredovanje informacij drugi državi članici in sprejem informacij s strani druge države članice veljajo omejitve v državi članici, v kateri je predlagan projekt.“
Annex II to Directive 85/337 lists projects subject to Article 4(2) of that directive, namely those for which an environmental impact assessment is necessary only where the Member States consider that their characteristics so require.
V prilogi II k Direktivi 85/337 so na�teti projekti iz člena 4(2) te direktive, to so tisti, za katere je treba izvesti presojo vplivov na okolje le, če države članice menijo, da njihove značilnosti tako zahtevajo.
Projects referred to in that annex include, in point 2(a), extraction of peat, and in point 2(c), extraction of minerals other than metalliferous and energy-producing minerals, such as marble, sand, gravel, shale, salt, phosphates and potash.
Tako so v točki 2(a) te priloge navedeni projekti pridobivanja �ote in v točki 2(c) projekti pridobivanja mineralnih snovi, kot so marmor, pesek, prod, skrilavec, fosfati in kalijev karbonat, razen kovinskih mineralnih snovi in mineralnih energetskih surovin.
Projects listed in point 10(d) of Annex II include the construction of roads.
V točki 10(d) navedene priloge so navedeni zlasti projekti gradnje cest.
If a request for development consent is submitted to a competent author - ity before the end of the timelimit laid down in paragraph 1, the provisions of Directive 85/337/EEC prior to these amendments shall continue to apply.’
Če se zahteva za soglasje za izvedbo predloži pristojnemu organu pred koncem roka, določenega v odstavku 1, se �e naprej uporabljajo določbe Direktive 85/337/EGS, sprejete pred temi spremembami.“
Directive 85/337 as amended by Directive 97/11 (‘Directive 85/337 as amended’)
Direktiva 85/337, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/11 (v nadaljevanju: spremenjena Direktiva 85/337)
In the interests of clarity, reference will be made only to the amendments to Directive 85/337 which have direct relevance to the alleged failure by Ireland to fulfil
Zaradi jasnosti bodo navedene le spremembe Direktive 85/337, ki se neposredno nana�ajo na zatrjevano neizpolnitev. Tako ne bodo navedene spremembe, ki so bile
2008 — CASE C-215/06 its obligations. Accordingly, reference will not be made to amendments introduced by Directive 97/11 to Articles 5 to 10 of Directive 85/337, since those have no bearing on the determination of this action which the Court is called upon to make.
2008 – ZADEVA C-215/06 uvedene z Direktivo 97/11 za člene od 5 do 10 Direktive 85/337, ker ne morejo vplivati na presojo Sodi�ča o tej tožbi.
Under Article 2(1) and (2) and the first subparagraph of Article 2(3) of Direct- ive 85/337 as amended:
V členu 2, od (1) do (3), prvi pododstavek, spremenjene Direktive 85/337 je določeno:
Without prejudice to Article 7, Member States may, in exceptional cases, exempt a specific project in whole or in part from the provisions laid down in this Directive.’
Brez poseganja v člen 7 lahko države članice v izjemnih primerih določen projekt v celoti ali delno izvzamejo iz določb v tej direktivi.“
Article 3 of Directive 85/337 as amended provides:
V členu 3 navedene direktive je določeno:
‘The environmental impact assessment shall identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner, in the light of each individual case and in accordance with Art -icles 4 to 11, the direct and indirect effects of a project on the following factors:
„Presoja vplivov na okolje na primeren način glede na vsak posamez[en] primer in skladno s členi 4 do 11 opredeli, opi�e in presodi neposredne in posredne vplive projekta na naslednje dejavnike:
— human beings, fauna and flora;
– ljudi, živalstvo in rastlinstvo,
— soil, water, air, climate and the landscape;
– tla, vodo, zrak, podnebje in krajino;
— material assets and the cultural heritage;
– materialno lastnino in kulturno dedi�čino;
— the interaction between the factors mentioned in the first, second and third indents.’
– medsebojne vplive dejavnikov, navedenih v prvi, drugi in tretji alineji.“
Article 4 of Directive 85/337 as amended provides:
V členu 4 spremenjene Direktive 85/337 je določeno:
Subject to Article 2(3), projects listed in Annex I shall be made subject to an assessment in accordance with Articles 5 to 10.
Ob upo�tevanju člena 2(3) se projekte, ki so na�teti v Prilogi I, presoja skladno s členi 5 do 10.
Subject to Article 2(3), for projects listed in Annex II, the Member States shall determine through:
Ob upo�tevanju člena 2(3) države članice za projekte, ki so na�teti v Prilogi II, s:
(a) a case-by-case examination, or
(a) preverjanjem za vsak primer posebej ali
(b) thresholds or criteria set by the Member State, whether the project shall be made subject to an assessment in accordance with Art -icles 5 to 10.
(b) pragovi ali merili, ki jih postavi država članica odločijo, ali se bo projekt presojal skladno s členi 5 do 10.
Member States may decide to apply both procedures referred to in (a) and (b).
Države članice se lahko odločijo za uporabo obeh postopkov, navedenih v (a) in (b).
When a case-by-case examination is carried out or thresholds or criteria are set for the purpose of paragraph 2, the relevant selection criteria set out in Annex III shall be taken into account.
Med preverjanjem za vsak primer posebej ali postavljanjem pragov ali meril za namen odstavka 2 se upo�tevajo ustrezna izbirna merila, določena v Prilogi III.
Member States shall ensure that the determination made by the competent authorities under paragraph 2 is made available to the public.’
Države članice zagotovijo, da je odločitev pristojnih organov v skladu z odstavkom 2 na razpolago javnosti.“
Point 3(i) of Annex II to Directive 85/337 as amended specifies installations for the harnessing of wind power for energy production (wind farms).
V točki 3(i) priloge II k spremenjeni Direktivi 85/337 so navedeni obrati za izkori�čanje energije vetra za proizvodnjo elektrike (polja vetrnih elektrarn).
By virtue of point 13 of Annex II, any change or extension of projects listed in Annex I or Annex II, already authorised, executed or in the process of being executed, which may have significant adverse effects on the environment (being a change or extension not listed in Annex I) must be regarded as a project within the scope of Article 4(2) of Directive 85/337 as amended.
V skladu s točko 13 iste priloge je treba vsako spremembo ali raz�iritev projektov, na�tetih v prilogi I ali prilogi II, ki so že dovoljeni, izvedeni ali se izvajajo in imajo lahko pomembne �kodljive vplive na okolje (pri čemer sprememba ali raz�iritev nista navedeni v prilogi I), obravnavati kot projekt, za katerega velja člen 4(2) spremenjene Direktive 85/337.
Annex III to Directive 85/337 as amended, relating to the selection criteria referred to in Article 4(3) of that directive, provides that the characteristics of projects must be considered in relation, inter alia, to pollution and nuisances, and to the risk of accidents having regard in particular to technologies used.
V prilogi III k spremenjeni Direktivi 85/337 v zvezi z izbirnimi merili iz člena 4(3) iste direktive je pojasnjeno, da je treba upo�tevati značilnosti projektov, predvsem onesnaževanje in obremenjevanje, tveganje nastanka nesreč, ob upo�tevanju zlasti uporabljene snovi in tehnologije.
That annex also indicates that the environmental sensitivity of geographical areas likely to be affected by projects must be considered having regard, inter alia, to the absorption capacity of the natural environment, paying particular attention to certain areas, including mountain and forest areas.
V isti prilogi je navedeno, da je treba upo�tevati okoljsko občutljivost določenih geografskih območij, ki jih bodo projekti verjetno prizadeli, zlasti ob upo�tevanju absorpcijske sposobnosti naravnega okolja s posebno pozornostjo, usmerjeno nekaterim območjem, med katerimi so gorska in gozdna območja.
The requirements of Directive 85/337 as amended have been transposed into national law by, in particular, the Planning and Development Act, 2000, as amended (‘the PDA’), and the Planning and Development Regulations, 2001.
Zahteve spremenjene Direktive 85/337 so bile v nacionalno pravo prenesene z zakonom o prostorskem načrtovanju in razvoju iz leta 2000 (Planning and Development Act 2000), kot je bil spremenjen (v nadaljevanju: PDA), in s predpisi o prostorskem načrtovanju in razvoju iz leta 2001 (Planning and Development Regulations 2001).
Section 32(1)(a) of the PDA lays down a general obligation to obtain consent for all development projects within the scope of Annexes I and II to Directive 85/337 as amended; the application for permission must be lodged and the permission obtained before the commencement of works. In addition, section 32(1)(b) of the PDA
V členu 32(1)(a) PDA je določena splo�na obveznost, da je treba pridobiti soglasje za vsak projekt prostorskega načrtovanja iz prilog I in II spremenjene Direktive 85/337, pri čemer je treba vložiti zahtevo za soglasje in pridobiti soglasje pred začetkom del.
2008 — CASE C-215/06 provides that permission can be obtained to regularise unauthorised development (retention permission).
Poleg tega je v členu 32(1)(b) istega zakona predvideno, da se lahko pridobi dovoljenje, da se tako načrtovanje, ki je bilo izvedeno brez soglasja, legalizira.
On receipt of an application for permission, the planning authority must decide whether the proposed development should be subject to an environmental impact assessment.
Organ, pristojen za prostorsko načrtovanje, mora, ko prejme zahtevo za soglasje, ugotoviti, ali je za predlagani projekt treba izvesti presojo vplivov na okolje.
Section 151 of the PDA provides that any person who has carried out or is carrying out unauthorised development is guilty of an offence.
V členu 151 PDA je določeno, da vsak, ki izvede ali izvaja projekt brez soglasja, stori prekr�ek.
It is clear from sections 152 and 153 of the PDA that, on receipt of a complaint, planning authorities are, as a general rule, under an obligation to issue a warning letter, and must then decide whether or not it is appropriate to issue an enforcement notice.
Iz členov 152 in 153 istega zakona izhaja, da morajo načeloma organi, pristojni za urbanizem, ob prejemu pritožbe poslati obvestilo z opozorilom in nato ugotoviti, ali je treba izdati opomin.
Failure to comply with the requirements of an enforcement notice constitutes an offence.
Če zadevna oseba ne spo�tuje zahtev, določenih v opominu, stori prekr�ek.
Under section 160 of the PDA:
V členu 160 PDA je določeno:
(a) that the unauthorised development is not carried out or continued;
(a) da se projekt, za katerega ni bilo izdano soglasje, ne izvede ali ne nadaljuje;
(b) in so far as practicable, that any land is restored to its condition prior to the commencement of any unauthorised development;
(b) da se v največji možni meri vsako zemlji�če vrne v stanje, v katerem je bilo pred začetkom projekta, za katerega ni bilo izdano soglasje;
(c) that any development is carried out in conformity with the permission pertaining to that development or any condition to which the permission is subject.
(c) da se vsak projekt izvede v skladu z izdanim soglasjem ali s pogoji, pod katerimi je bilo soglasje izdano.
Section 162 of the PDA makes clear that an application for retention permission does not entail any ongoing enforcement action being stayed or withdrawn.
V členu 162 PDA je določeno, da zahteva za legalizacijo ne zadrži ali konča začetega postopka prisilnih ukrepov.
After sending a letter of formal notice on 5 April 2001, the Commission sent to Ireland a reasoned opinion dated 21 December 2001.
Po pisnem opominu z dne 5. aprila 2001 je Komisija poslala Irski �e obrazloženo mnenje z dne 21. decembra 2001.
On 7 July 2004, the Commission sent an additional letter of formal notice to Ireland.
Komisija je 7. julija 2004 poslala tej državi članici dodatni pisni opomin.
On 5 January 2005, after the receipt of Ireland’s observations as set out in a letter dated 6 December 2004, an additional reasoned opinion was sent to Ireland.
Irski je bilo dodatno obrazloženo mnenje poslano 5. januarja 2005 po prejemu njenih stali�č z dopisom z dne 6. decembra 2004.
Since the Commission considered that Ireland’s response to that reasoned opinion, in letters of 8 March, 17 June and 1 December 2005, was unsatisfactory, it brought this action under the second paragraph of Article 226 EC.
Ker je Komisija menila, da stali�če Irske, podano kot odgovor na navedeno obrazloženo mnenje z dopisi z dne 8. marca, 17. junija in 1. decembra 2005, ni zadovoljivo, je na podlagi člena 226, drugi odstavek, ES vložila to tožbo.
The Commission’s complaint is that Ireland has not taken all the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 4 and 5 to 10 of Directive 85/337 either in its original version or as amended by Directive 97/11.
Komisija očita Irski, da ni sprejela vseh potrebnih ukrepov za uskladitev s členi 2, 4, in od 5 do 10 Direktive 85/337 v različici pred spremembami in po njih, uvedenih z Direktivo 97/11.
This complaint will be examined, first, in relation to Directive 85/337 as amended.
Ta očitek se bo najprej preučil v zvezi s spremenjeno Direktivo 85/337.
The first complaint, that transposition of Directive 85/337 as amended is incomplete and that, as a result, the directive is not properly implemented is based on three pleas in law.
Prvi očitek, v skladu s katerim naj bi bil prenos spremenjene Direktive 85/337 nepopoln in naj bi vodil do njenega nepravilnega izvr�evanja, je utemeljen na treh tožbenih razlogih.
First, the Commission claims that Ireland has not taken the measures necessary in order to ensure that checks are made to ascertain, in accordance with Article 2(1) of Directive 85/337 as amended, whether proposed works are likely to have significant effects on the environment, and, if that is the case, in order to render it obligatory that an environmental impact assessment be carried out, as laid down by that provision, before the grant of development consent.
Prvič, Komisija uveljavlja, da Irska ni sprejela vseh potrebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev, da se presodi v skladu s členom 2(1) spremenjene Direktive 85/337, ali bodo predlagani projekti pomembno vplivali na okolje, in če bodo, da se pred izdajo soglasja izvede postopek presoje vplivov na okolje, predviden v navedeni določbi.
Secondly, the Commission considers that the Irish legislation which allows an application for retention permission to be made after a development has been executed in whole or in part without consent undermines the preventive objectives of Directive 85/337 as amended.
Drugič, Komisija meni, da irske zakonske določbe, na podlagi katerih se lahko vloži zahteva za legalizacijo po tem, ko je bil projekt v celoti ali deloma izveden, kr�ijo preventivne cilje spremenjene Direktive 85/337.
Thirdly, the Commission claims that the enforcement regime established by Ireland does not guarantee the effective application of the directive, and that Ireland has thereby failed to fulfil its general obligation under Article 249 EC.
Tretjič, Komisija meni, da prisilni ukrepi, ki jih je uvedla Irska, ne zagotavljajo učinkovite uporabe navedene direktive, s čimer Irska tako ni izpolnila svoje splo�ne obveznosti iz člena 249 ES.