natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There were 28 inquiries (10%) concerning the European Parliament's administration, 20 (7%) concerning the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), 10 (3%) concerning the Council of the EU, and 7 (2%) concerning the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).
Osemindvajset preiskav (10 %) je zadevalo upravo Evropskega parlamenta, 20 (7 %) Evropski urad za izbor osebja (Epso), 10 (3 %) Svet Evropske unije in 7 (2 %) Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (Olaf).
Twenty other EU institutions and bodies were the subject of a further 37 inquiries.The main types of maladministration alleged in inquiries opened in 2008 were lack of transparency, including refusal of information (107 cases or 36% of the total), unfairness or abuse of power (59 cases, 20%), unsatisfactory procedures (27 cases, 9%), negligence (25 cases, 8%), avoidable delay (24 cases, 8%), legal error (21 cases, 7%), discrimination (14 cases, 5%), and failure to ensure fulfilment of obligations, that is, failure by the Commission to carry out its role as "guardian of the Treaty" vis-à-vis the Member States (14 cases, 5%).The Ombudsman closed 355 inquiries in 2008 (compared to 348 in 2007).
Dvajset drugih institucij in organov EU je bilo predmet nadaljnjih 37 preiskav.Glavne vrste domnevnih nepravilnosti v preiskavah, začetih v letu 2008, so se nanašale na pomanjkanje preglednosti, vključno z zavračanjem posredovanja podatkov (107 primerov ali 36 % vseh primerov), nepravičnost ali zlorabo pooblastil (59 primerov, 20 %), nezadovoljive postopke (27 primerov, 9 %), malomarnost (25 primerov, 8 %), nepotrebne zamude (24 primerov, 8 %), pravne napake (21 primerov, 7 %), diskriminacijo (14 primerov, 5 %) in neizpolnjevanje obveznosti, tj. neuspešnost Komisije pri opravljanju vloge „varuhinje Pogodbe“ v odnosu do držav članic (14 prime- rov, 5 %).Varuh človekovih pravic je v letu 2008 zaključil 355 preiskav (v primerjavi s 348 preiskavami v letu 2007).
Of these, 352 were linked to complaints and three were own-initiatives.
Od tega je 352 preiskav temeljilo na pritožbah, tri pa so bile izvedene na lastno pobudo.
Most of the inquiries were closed within one year (52%).
Večina preiskav je bila zaključena v manj kot enem letu (52 %).
Over one-third (36%) were closed within three months.
Več kot tretjina (36 %) jih je bila zaključena prej kot v treh mesecih.
On average, cases took 13 months to close.
V povprečju so bili primeri zaključeni v 13 mesecih.
Whenever possible in inquiries, the Ombudsman tries to achieve a positive-sum outcome that satisfies both the complainant and the institution complained against. The co-operation of the Community institutions and bodies is essential for success in achieving such outcomes, which help
1.Letno poročilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic od letos uporablja statistično kategorijo „evidentirane pritožbe“ namesto „prejete pritožbe“, da je mogoče razlikovati med pritožbami, ki so bile dejansko evidentirane v danem koledarskem letu, in tistimi, ki so bile prejete v istem obdobju, vendar evidentirane šele v naslednjem letu.
2.The statistical category "processed" means that the analysis designed to determine whether the complaint (i) falls within the Ombudsman's mandate, (ii) meets the criteria of admissibility, and (iii) provides grounds to open an inquiry has been completed.
2.Statistična kategorija „obravnavanih“ pritožb pomeni, da je bila izvedena analiza, namenjena ugotavljanju, ali pritožba (i) sodi v pristojnost varuha človekovih pravic, (ii) ustreza merilom dopustnosti in (iii) daje razloge za začetek preiskave.
Because of the time required for this, the number of complaints "processed" in a given year is different from the number of complaints "registered" in the same year.
Zaradi časa, potrebnega za to, se število „obravnavanih“ pritožb v danem letu razlikuje od števila „evidentiranih“ pritožb v istem letu.
Executive Summary enhance relations between the institutions and citizens, and can avoid the need for expensive and timeconsuming litigation.
Varuh človekovih pravic si pri preiskavah, če je le mogoče, prizadeva doseči rezultat, s katerim sta zadovoljna pritožnik in institucija, zoper katero je vložena pritožba.
A positive outcome was readily achieved for the complainant in 129 cases closed in 2008 (36% of the total).
Pozitiven izid za pritožnika je bil dosežen v 129 primerih, ki so bili zaključeni v letu 2008 (36 % vseh primerov).
These cases were either settled by the institution or a friendly solution was agreed (this compares to 134 cases in 2007, which itself was twice the number of such cases in 2006).
Te primere so rešile institucije ali pa je bila najdena sporazumna rešitev (v letu 2007 je bilo takih primerov 134, kar je dvakrat toliko kot v letu 2006).
In 31% of cases (110), no maladministration was found.
V 31 % primerov (110) nepravilnosti niso bile ugotovljene.
This is not necessarily a negative outcome for the complainant, who at least benefits from receiving a full explanation from the institution or
To ni nujno negativen rezultat za pritožnika, ki od zadevne institucije ali organa vsaj prejme temeljito obrazložitev dejanja in varuhovo
Whenever possible in inquiries, the Ombudsman tries to achieve a positive-sum outcome that satisfies both the complainant and the institution complained against.
Varuh človekovih pravic si pri preiskavah, če je lemogoče, prizadeva doseči rezultat, s katerim stazadovoljna pritožnik in institucija, zoper katero jevložena pritožba.
The Ombudsman concluded that there was maladministration in 15% of cases (53), but was nevertheless able to obtain a posi- tive outcome for the complainant in eight of these cases through the acceptance of the draft recommendation that he made to the institution concerned.
Varuh človekovih pravic ni ugotovil nepravilnosti v 15 % primerov (53), vendar mu je kljub temu pozitiven rezultat za pritožnika uspelo doseči v osmih od teh primerov, tako da je insti- tucija sprejela osnutek priporočila, ki ga je varuh naslovil nanjo.
In one case where the Commission failed to accept a draft recommendation concerning age discrimination (185/2005/ELB), the Ombudsman submitted a special report to the European Parliament.
V enem primeru, v katerem Komisija ni sprejela osnutka priporočila v zvezi z diskriminacijo na podlagi starosti (185/2005/ELB), je varuh človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu predložil posebno poročilo.
This constitutes the Ombudsman's ultimate weapon and is the last substantive step he takes in dealing with a case.
To je zadnje orožje varuha človekovih pravic in zadnji mogoči ukrep pri obravnavi primera.
In 44 cases, the inquiry was closed with a critical remark to the institution or body concerned.
V 44 primerih se je preiskava končala s kritično pripombo za zadevno institucijo ali organ.
A critical remark confirms to the complainant that his or her complaint was justified and indicates to the institution or body concerned what it has done wrong, so as to help it avoid maladministration in the future.
Kritična pripomba pritožniku potrdi, da je bila njegova pritožba upravičena, institucijam ali organom pa pokaže njihovo napako, da se lahko v prihodnje izognejo podobnim nepravilnostim.
It is similarly with a view to improving the EU institutions' performance in the future that the Ombudsman has made increasing use of further remarks, when he identifies an opportunity to enhance the quality of the administration.
Varuh človekovih pravic je podobno zaradi izboljšanja uspešnosti institucij EU v prihodnosti pogosteje uporabljal dodatne pripombe, kadar je opazil priložnost za izboljšanje kakovosti uprave.
The Ombudsman made further remarks in a total of 41 cases in 2008.It is important for the institutions and bodies to follow up critical and further remarks from the Ombudsman and to take action to resolve outstanding problems.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v letu 2008 dodatne pripombe pripravil v 41 primerih.Za institucije in organe je pomembno, da spremljajo kritične pripombe in dodatne pripombe varuha človekovih pravic ter si prizadevajo odpraviti ugotovljene težave. S tem v mislih je varuh
It is important for the institutions and bodies to follow up critical and further remarks from the Ombudsman and to take action to resolve outstanding problems.
Za institucije in organe je pomembno, daspremljajo kritične ocene in dodatne pripombevaruha človekovih pravic ter si prizadevajoodpraviti obstoječe težave.
published on his website, in 2008, two studies of the followup undertaken by the institutions involved to all critical remarks and further remarks issued in 2006 and 2007.
človekovih pravic v letu 2008 na svoji spletni strani objavil dve študiji o nadaljnjih ukrepih institucij, ki so v letih 2006 in 2007 prejele kritične pripombe in dodatne pripombe.
The Ombudsman envisages informing the public on an annual basis of his findings on the institutions' followup to critical and further remarks.
Varuh človekovih pravic načrtuje letno obveščanje javnosti o svojih ugotovitvah o nadaljnjih ukrepih institucij v zvezi s kritičnimi pripombe in dodatnimi pripombami.
Star cases exemplifying best practice [→→→]
Nadvse uspešni primeri, ki predstavljajo najboljšo prakso [→→→]
Eight cases closed in 2008 constitute illustrative examples of best practice.
Osem primerov, zaključenih v letu 2008, je zglednih primerov najboljše prakse.
They serve as a model for all EU institutions and bodies, in terms of how best to react to issues that the Ombudsman raises.
Vsem institucijam in organom EU so za zgled, kako se najbolje odzvati na težave, na katere jih opozori varuh človekovih pravic.
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) agreed to disclose to candidates, at their request, the evaluation criteria used in selection procedures, as well as a breakdown of individual marks.
Evropskiuradzaizborosebja (Epso) je privolil, da bo kandidatom na njihovo zahtevo razkril merila za ocenjevanje, uporabljena pri izbirnih postopkih, in tudi razčlenitev posameznih ocen.
This followed an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman, who praised EPSO for adopting such a transparent approach (OI/5/2005/PB).
Privolitev je sledila preiskavi, ki jo je varuh človekovih pravic izvedel na lastno pobudo in ki je Epso pohvalil, ker je sprejel tako pregleden pristop (OI/5/2005/PB).
The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) reacted constructively to a request for access to documents.
Evropskiuradzabojprotigolju-fijam (Olaf) se je na zahtevo za dostop do dokumentov konstruktivno odzval.
By releasing two versions of the relevant report, one with the complainant's personal data and the other without, it complied with the EU's access to documents rules, while demonstrating a citizen-centred approach (754/2007/BU).
Z izdajo dveh različic ustreznega poročila, eno z osebnimi podatki pritožnika in eno brez njih, je ravnal v skladu s pravili EU o dostopu do dokumentov, hkrati pa pokazal pristop, ki je osredotočen na državljane (754/2007/BU).
Also concerning access to documents and information, an Austrian citizen complained to the Ombudsman about inadequate information she had received from the Registry of the European Court of Justice.
V zvezi z dostopom do dokumentov in podatkov se je varuhu človekovih pravic zaradi nezadostnih podatkov, ki jih je prejela od sodnega tajništva Evropskegasodišča, pritožila tudi avstrijska državljanka.
After the Ombudsman's intervention, the Registry sent the complainant a letter with more detailed information and confirmed to the Ombudsman that it had included these additional indications in its standard letters for similar cases (2448/2008/WP).
Po posredovanju varuha človekovih pravic je sodno tajništvo pritožnici poslalo dopis s podrobnejšimi podatki, varuhu človekovih pravic pa zagotovilo, da je te dodatne navedbe vključilo v standardne dopise za podobne primere (2448/2008/WP).
The Ombudsman praised the Commission for its constructive approach in two contractual cases.
Varuh človekovih pravic je Komisijo pohvalil zaradi njenega konstruktivnega pristopa v dveh pogodbenih primerih.
In a case concerning a payment dispute with an Italian company over an EU project to supply water for displaced persons in Liberia, the Commission was thorough and constructive throughout the procedure, even to the point of accepting additional relevant payments identified by its own services and the complainant. As a result, the Italian company received more than eUR 100 000
V primeru zaradi spora z italijanskim podjetjem glede plačila pri projektu EU za oskrbo razseljenih oseb v Liberiji z vodo je bila Komisija temeljita in konstruktivna skozi celoten postopek, tako da je celo sprejela dodatna ustrezna plačila, ki so jih odkrili njene službe
The European Ombudsman — Annual Report 2008
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic — Letno poročilo 2008 in pritožnik.
In a case concerning an Austrian institute involved in a research and development contract in the field of chemical engineering, the Commission agreed to pay eUR 54 000.
V primeru v zvezi z avstrijskim inštitutom, ki je sodeloval pri naročilu raziskav in razvoja v kemijskem inženiringu, se je Komisija strinjala, da bo plačala 54 000 eUR.
This followed the Ombudsman's request that it reconsider its refusal to pay an outstanding sum because it had not received the final cost statements on time (3784/2006/FOR).
Odločitev je sledila zahtevi varuha človekovih pravic, da naj Komisija razmisli o svoji zavrnitvi plačila neporavnanega zneska, ker ni pravočasno prejela končnega poročila o stroških (3784/2006/FOR).
In case 2672/2008/VL, the Ombudsman used a simplified inquiry procedure and was encouraged to note that the Commission responded positively by resolving, in a rapid and exemplary manner, a contentious e-mail dispute involving an academic researcher and a Commission official.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v primeru 2672/2008/VL uporabil poenostavljen postopek preiskave, v katerem se je Komisija odzvala pozitivno, tako da je prepir po e-pošti med akademskim raziskovalcem in uradnico Komisije, hitro in zgledno rešil.
Further examples of best practice include case 1162/2007/FOR, where the Council agreed to make an ex gratia payment of eUR 1 000 in recognition of the inconvenience and stress that the complainant had suffered.
Med primeri najboljših praks je tudi primer 1162/2007/FOR, pri katerem se je Svet strinjal, da prostovoljno plača 1 000 eUR kot odškodnino za neprijetnosti in stres, ki jih je utrpel pritožnik.
The Council had initially offered the complainant a one year contract and then changed the terms when it realised that the complainant would turn 65 during that period.
Svet je pritožniku naprej ponudil enoletno pogodbo, nato pa spremenil njene pogoje, ko je ugotovil, da bo pritožnik v tem času dopolnil 65 let.
Finally, for the third year running, the response of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to a complaint brought to its attention should be applauded.
Nazadnje pa je treba že tretje leto zapored treba zaploskati odzivu Evropskeagencijezavarnostvletalstvu (Easa) na pritožbo, na katero je bila opozorjena.
In case 893/2006/BU, EASA not only apologised for a mistake it had made in a selection procedure, but also agreed to give the complainant the information he required and committed itself to doing so in future procedures.
Easa se je v primeru 893/2006/BU ne samo opravičila za napako, ki jo je naredila v izbirnem postopku, temveč je tudi soglašala, da pritožniku zagotovi podatke, ki jih je zahteval, in se zavezala, da bo to storila tudi v prihodnjih postopkih.
Decisions closing cases are normally published on the Ombudsman's website (http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu) in English and, if different, in the language of the complainant. During
Vse odločbe, ki jih varuh človekovih pravic sprejme po končani preiskavi, so običajno objavljene na njegovi spletni strani (http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu) v angleščini in jeziku pritožnika,
Decisions closing cases are normally published on the Ombudsman's website (www.ombudsman.europa.eu) in English and, if different, in the language of the complainant.
Vse odločitve, ki jih varuh človekovih pravicsprejme po končani preiskavi, so običajnoobjavljene na njegovi spletni strani (http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu) v angleščiniin jeziku pritožnika, če ta ni angleščina.
A selected number of cases are made available on the Ombudsman's website in summary form in all 23 official EU languages.
če ta ni angleščina. Varuh človekovih pravic je leta 2008 sprejel novo obliko in sestavo svojih odločb, s katerima je ohranil odseka bistvena dejstva in analiza, vendar je besedilo krajše, lažje berljivo in zato tudi dostopnejše.Izbrano število primerov je v obliki povzetka na voljo na spletni strani varuha človekovih pravic v vseh 23 uradnih jezikih EU.
The summaries reflect the range of subjects and of Community institutions and bodies covered by the 355 decisions closing cases in 2008, as well as the different reasons for closing cases.
Povzetki prikazujejo različne teme ter institucije in organe Skupnosti, zajete v 355 odločbah, s katerimi so bile zaključene preiskave v letu 2008, ter različne razloge za zaključek.
Section 3.5 of this Report analyses the most significant findings of law and fact contained in the Ombudsman's decisions in 2008.
V razdelku 3.5 tega poročila so analizirani najpomembnejše pravne ugotovitve in dejstva, ki jih vsebujejo odločbe varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2008.
It is organised in terms of a thematic classification of the main subject matter of inquiries, constructed around seven main categories3:• Openness, public access and personal data;• The Commission as guardian of the Treaty;• Award of tenders and grants;• Execution of contracts;• Administration and staff regulations;• Competitions and selection procedures;• Institutional, policy matters and other.The first section of the thematic analysis reviews the Ombudsman's decisions in 2008 on complaints concerning (i) public access to documents, (ii) public access to information, and (iii) the protection of personal data and the right of data subjects to have access to their data.
Tematsko so razvrščene v sedem glavnih kategorij glede na glavni predmet preiskave3:• Odprtost, dostop javnosti in osebni podatki;• Evropska komisija kot varuhinja Pogodbe;• Dodelitev razpisov in dotacij;• Izvajanje pogodb;• Upravni in kadrovski predpisi;• Natečaji in izbirni postopki;• Istitucionalne in politične zadeve ter drugo.V prvem delu tematske analize so obravnavane odločbe varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2008 o pritožbah v zvezi z (i) dostopom javnosti do dokumentov, (ii) dostopom javnosti do podatkov ter (iii) varovanjem osebnih podatkov in pravico, da osebe, na katere se podatki nanašajo, dostopajo do svojih podatkov.
Issues examined range from delays in giving access to documents to diverging interpretations of the exceptions provided for in Regulation 1049/2001 on public access to documents4.
Obravnavane zadeve obsegajo različne težave, od zamud pri omogočanju dostopa do dokumentov do različnega razlaganja izjem iz Uredbe št. 1049/2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov4.
Cases in which the Ombudsman consulted the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) on the data protection aspects of transparency issues are also analysed.The second category of cases concerns complaints against the Commission in its role as guardian of the Treaty.
Analizirani so tudi primeri, v katerih se je varuh človekovih pravic z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov posvetoval o vidiku varstva podatkov pri vprašanjih preglednosti.
3.On the basis of inquiries opened in 2008, the breakdown in terms of the main subject matter of inquiries is as follows: transparency (26%), institutional and policy matters (17%), the Commission as guardian of the Treaty (17%), competitions and selection procedures (14%), administration and staff regulations (10%), execution of contracts (8%), award of tenders or grants (8%).4.Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.
3.Na podlagi preiskav, ki so bile sprožene v letu 2008, je razčlenitev glede na glavni predmet preiskave naslednja: preglednost (26 %), institucionalne in politične zadeve (17 %), Komisija kot varuhinja Pogodbe (17 %), natečaji in izbirni postopki (14 %), upravni in kadrovski predpisi (10 %), izvajanje pogodb (8 %), dodelitev razpisov in dotacij (8 %).4.Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, UL 2001 L 145, str. 43.
Executive Summary sion's treatment of such cases.
Varuh človekovih pravic lahko obravnava procesne in materialne vidike obravnave, ki jo Komisija izvede v takih primerih.
With regard to the substantive aspects, the Ombudsman's review aims at verifying whether the conclusions reached by the Commission are reasonable and whether they are well argued and thoroughly explained to complainants.
V pregledu varuha človekovih pravic se v zvezi z materialnimi vidiki poskuša preveriti, ali so sklepi Komisije razumni ter ali so dovolj utemeljeni in razloženi pritožnikom.
With regard to procedural aspects, the main point of reference in the Ombudsman's inquiries is the Commission's Communication on relations with the complainant in respect of infringements of Community law5.
V zvezi s procesnimi vidiki je pri preiskavah varuha človekovih pravic glavna oporna točka sporočilo Komisije o odnosih s pritožniki v primeru kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti5.
Among the allegations examined in relation to such cases in 2008 were delays, the provision of inadequate information to the complainant, and failure to register complaints.
Med trditvami, preučenimi v zvezi s takimi primeri v letu 2008, so bile zamude, pošiljanje nezadostnih podatkov pritožnikom in dejstvo, da pritožbe niso bile evidentirane.
The third section of the thematic analysis deals with complaints about the award, or non-award, of tenders and grants.
V tretjem delu tematske analize so obravnavane pritožbe zaradi dodelitve ali zavrnjene dodelitve razpisov in dotacij.
The Ombudsman's review in such cases is limited to checking whether the rules governing the procedure are complied with, the facts are correct, and no manifest error of assessment or misuse of powers has occurred.
Pregled varuha človekovih pravic je v takih primerih omejen na preverjanje, ali so bila upoštevana pravila, s katerimi se urejajo postopki, ali dejstva držijo in ali se je zgodila napaka pri oceni ali zloraba pooblastil.
He may also review if the institutions have complied with their duties to state reasons and if these are coherent and reasonable.
Preveriti je mogoče tudi, ali so institucije v skladu s svojo dolžnostjo navedle razloge in ali so ti razlogi skladni in smiselni.
In 2008, the Ombudsman examined issues of improper handling of tender procedures, inadequate information, and unfounded accusations.The fourth category looks at cases in which complainants contest the institutions' failure to fulfil obligations arising from contracts.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v letu 2008 preučil nepravilno izvajanje razpisnih postopkov, nezadostne podatke in neutemeljene obtožbe.V četrti kategoriji so obravnavani primeri, v katerih se pritožniki pritožujejo, ker institucija ni izpolnila obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz pogodb.
With regard to contractual disputes, the Ombudsman considers it justified to limit his inquiry to examining whether the Community institution or body has provided him with a coherent and reasonable account of the legal basis for its actions and why it believes that its view of the contractual position is justified.
Varuh človekovih pravic meni, da je v zvezi s pogodbenimi spori upravičeno, da svojo preiskavo omeji na preučitev, ali je institucija ali organ Skupnosti zagotovil skladno in smiselno pravno podlago za svoja dejanja in zakaj misli, da je njegovo stališče do pogodbenega položaja upravičeno.
In 2008, the Ombudsman examined issues of late payment, unfair treatment, and problems relating to sub-contractors.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v letu 2008 preučeval težave zaradi prepoznega plačila in nepravične obravnave ter težave v zvezi s podizvajalci.