natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It can happen that, in their reply to the statement of objections, the notifying parties will supplement or clarify their ‘case’ regarding the functioning of the market or markets in question in the light of that statement, so that new elements may be added or facts previously examined by the Commission may be put in an entirely different light.
Priglasitelji lahko namreč v odgovoru na obvestilo o ugotovitvah o možnih kr�itvah glede na to obvestilo dopolnijo ali pojasnijo svoje stali�če o delovanju zadevnega trga ali zadevnih trgov, tako da bi bili lahko dodani novi dokazi ali bi bilo lahko dejansko stanje, ki ga je že ugotovila Komisija, ume�čeno v popolnoma drug kontekst.
can obtain detailed indications as to the reservations of the Commission in relation to their proposed concentration and as to the arguments and evidence on which it relies in that regard.
koncentracije in dokazov, na katere se v zvezi s tem opira.
A line of argument put forward in reply to the statement of objections forms part of the investigation to be undertaken in the formal proceedings and is not submitted out of time, but at the time laid down for that purpose in the procedure for the control of concentrations.
Utemeljitev, podana v odgovoru na obvestilo o ugotovitvah o možnih kr�itvah, spada v okvir preiskave, ki jo je treba izvesti v okviru formalnega postopka, in ni prepozna, ampak je podana v roku, določenem za ta namen v postopku nadzora koncentracij.
Having regard to the requirements of the rights of the defence, such a line of argument cannot be subject to more demanding standards as to their probative value and their cogency than those imposed in relation to the arguments of competitors, customers and other third parties questioned by the Commission in the course of the administrative procedure or in the light of information provided by the notifying undertakings at a previous stage of the Commission’s investigation.
Ob upo�tevanju zahtev pravice do obrambe za take utemeljitve priglasiteljev, podane v odgovoru na obvestilo o ugotovitvah o možnih kr�itvah, ne morejo veljati večje zahteve glede njihove dokazne vrednosti in prepričljivosti kot tiste, ki veljajo za trditve konkurentov, kupcev in drugih tretjih oseb, ki jih zasli�i Komisija med upravnim postopkom, ali za dokaze, ki jih predložijo podjetja, ki prigla�ujejo, v fazi pred preiskavo Komisije.
(see paras 69, 73, 75, 76)
(Glej točke 69, 73, 75 in 76.)
Furthermore, when the Commission examines in its decision the arguments submitted by the notifying undertakings in reply to the statement of objections and takes the opportunity to reconsider its provisional findings in that statement, with a view to possibly departing from them, without making a request for information or undertaking any new market investigations, it does not ‘delegate’ the investigation to the notifying undertakings.
Poleg tega, kadar Komisija v odločbi preučuje trditve podjetij, ki prigla�ujejo, v odgovoru na obvestilo o ugotovitvah o možnih kr�itvah, in izkoristi priložnost, da ponovno preuči svoje začasne ugotovitve iz tega obvestila, da bi morda odstopila od njih, ne da bi posredovala zahtevo za predložitev podatkov, ne „prenese“ izvedbe preiskave na navedena podjetja.
It flows from the rights of defence of the undertakings notifying a concentration that those undertakings have the right to submit in their written and oral hearing following receipt of the statement of objections all material which they consider capable of refuting the Commission’s objections and of leading it to approve their proposed concentration.
Pravica priglasiteljev koncentracije do obrambe pomeni, da imajo ti pravico v okviru njihovega pisnega in ustnega zasli�anja po prejemu obvestila o ugotovitvah o možnih kr�itvah predložiti vse, za kar menijo, da bi lahko ovrglo očitke Komisije in jo privedlo do odobritve njihove prigla�ene koncentracije.
Accordingly, those parties cannot, as a rule, be criticised for putting forward certain — potentially decisive — arguments, facts or evidence only in their arguments in reply to the statement of objections.
Zato se jim načeloma ne bi smelo očitati, da so določene trditve, dejstva ali dokaze, morda odločilne, podali �ele v okviru svojega odgovora na obvestilo o ugotovitvah o možnih kr�itvah.
It is only with that statement that the parties to the concentration
Stranke koncentracije lahko namreč �ele s tem obvestilom pridobijo podrobnej�e pokazatelje glede zadržkov Komisije glede načrta
It is true that the Commission is required to examine carefully the arguments of the parties to the concentration
Res je, da mora Komisija natančno preučiti trditve strank koncentracije glede njihove pravilnosti, popolnosti in
SUMMARY — CASE C-413/06 P for extensive information to numerous economic operators shortly before transmitting its draft decision to the Advisory Committee on concentrations, pursuant to Article 19 of Regulation No 4064/89.
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-413/06 P svetovalnemu odboru za nadzor koncentracij podjetij na podlagi člena 19 Uredbe �t. 4064/89.
(see paras 89, 91-95)
(Glej točke 89 in od 91 do 95.)
as regards their exactitude, completeness and cogency and to disregard them where justified doubts arise.
447/98 priglasitev nameravane koncentracije vsebovati pravilne in popolne podatke in da morajo stranke, ki prigla�ujejo, v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe �t.
It is also true that, under Article 3(1) of Regulation No 447/98, the notification of the proposed concentration must contain information that is correct and complete and that, in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation No 4064/89, the notifying parties are bound to provide a response to any requests for information by the Commission which is complete, correct and submitted within the periods laid down, failing which, where the information in question was requested by decision, the Commission may, by virtue of Articles 14 and 15 of Regulation No 4064/89, impose fines and periodic penalty payments.
4064/89 odgovoriti popolno in pravilno ter v rokih, določenih v morebitni zahtevi Komisije za predložitev podatkov, sicer lahko Komisija, kadar so bili zadevni podatki zahtevani z odločbo, na podlagi členov 14 in 15 Uredbe �t. 4064/89 naloži globe ali periodične denarne kazni.
None the less, it remains the case that the Commission must, at the stage of the reply to the statement of objections, if it is not to undermine the rights of defence of the notifying parties, apply the same criteria as those applied for the purposes of the examination of the arguments of third parties or those adopted at an earlier stage of its investigation, while being entitled to draw the appropriate consequences in the event that it should transpire at a very advanced stage of the procedure that the notification concerned does not comply with the requirements of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 447/98.
Vendar pa ostaja dejstvo, da mora Komisija v fazi odgovora na obvestilo o ugotovitvah o možnih kr�itvah, da ne bi razvrednotila pravic do obrambe strank, ki prigla�ujejo, uporabiti enaka merila kot tista pri obravnavanju trditev tretjih strank, oziroma merila, uporabljena v začetni fazi preiskave, pri čemer lahko ustrezno ukrepa v primeru, če se pozneje v postopku izkaže, da zadevna priglasitev ne izpolnjuje zahtev iz člena 3(1) Uredbe �t. 447/98.
In those circumstances, having regard in particular to the time constraints which arise by virtue of the procedural timelimits laid down by Regulation No 4064/89, the Commission cannot, in principle, be required, in every individual case, to send, following communication of the objections and after hearing the undertakings concerned, requests
V teh okoli�činah, zlasti ob upo�tevanju časovnih omejitev, ki izhajajo iz procesnih rokov, določenih v Uredbi �t. 4064/89, Komisiji načeloma ni treba v vsakem primeru posebej, po po�iljanju obvestila o ugotovitvah o možnih kr�itvah in po zasli�anju zadevnih podjetij, po�iljati večim gospodarskim subjektom zahteve po ob�irnej�ih podatkih tik pred posredovanjem svojega osnutka odločbe
In assessing the compatibility of a concentration with the common market, where the creation or strengthening of a collective dominant position is alleged, the Commission is obliged to assess, using a prospective analysis of the reference market, whether the concentration which has been referred to it will lead to a situation in which effective competition in the relevant market is significantly impeded by the undertakings which are parties to the concentration and one or more other undertakings which together, in particular because of correlative factors which exist between them, are able to adopt a common policy on the market in order to profit from a situation of collective economic strength, without actual or potential competitors, let alone customers or consumers, being able to react effectively.
Glede trditve o vzpostavitvi ali krepitvi kolektivnega prevladujočega položaja mora Komisija v okviru presoje združljivosti koncentracije s skupnim trgom na podlagi prospektivne analize referenčnega trga presoditi, ali ima predložena koncentracija za posledico položaj, v katerem učinkovito konkurenco na zadevnem trgu resno ovirajo podjetja, stranke koncentracije, in eno ali več drugih podjetij, ki lahko skupaj, zlasti zaradi med njimi obstoječih korelacijskih dejavnikov, usklajeno ravnajo na trgu, da bi izkoristila položaj kolektivne ekonomske moči in to ne da bi se sedanji ali prihodnji konkurenti ali celo kupci in potro�niki lahko učinkovito odzvali.
Such correlative factors include, in particular, the relationship of interdependence existing between the parties to a tight oligopoly within which, on a market with the appropriate characteristics, in particular in terms of market concentration, transparency and product homogeneity, those parties are in a position to anticipate one another’s behaviour and are therefore strongly encouraged to align their conduct on
Taki korelacijski dejavniki vključujejo zlasti odnos medsebojne odvisnosti med člani tesnega oligopola, znotraj katerega lahko na trgu z ustreznimi značilnostmi, zlasti glede tržne koncentracije, preglednosti in homogenosti proizvodov, te stranke predvidijo ravnanje druga druge in so torej močno spodbujene k temu, da uskladijo svoje ravnanje na trgu, tako da povečajo njihov skupni dobiček z zvi�anjem cen, zmanj�anjem proizvodnje, izbire ali kakovosti blaga in storitev,
BERTELSMANN AND SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA v IMPALA the market in such a way as to maximise their joint profits by increasing prices, reducing output, the choice or quality of goods and services, diminishing innov -ation or otherwise influencing parameters of competition.
BERTELSMANN IN SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA PROTI IMPALA zmanj�anjem inovacij ali kak�nim drugačnim vplivanjem na dejavnike konkurence.
In such a context, each operator is aware that highly competitive action on its part would provoke a reaction on the part of the others, so that it would derive no benefit from its initiative.
V tem okviru namreč vsak udeleženec ve, da bi njegovo zelo konkurenčno ravnanje sprožilo pri drugih odziv, tako da ne bi imel od svoje pobude nobene koristi.
Unless they can form a shared tacit understanding of the terms of the coordination, competitors might resort to practices that are prohibited by Article 81 EC in order to be able to adopt a common policy on the market.
zateči k ravnanjem, ki so prepovedana s členom 81 ES, da bi lahko sprejeli politiko skupnega delovanja na trgu.
Moreover, having regard to the temptation which may exist for each participant in a tacit coordination to depart from it in order to increase its short-term profit, it is necessary to determine whether such coordination is sustainable.
Poleg tega, zlasti ob upo�tevanju morebitne želje, ki jo ima lahko vsak udeleženec tihega usklajevanja, da zaradi kratkoročnega povečanja dobička ne bo več ravnal usklajeno, je treba presoditi, ali tako usklajevanje lahko traja.
In that regard, the coordinating undertakings must be able to monitor to a sufficient degree whether the terms of the coordination are being adhered to.
Podjetja, ki usklajujejo svoja ravnanja, morajo biti sposobna v zadostni meri spremljati, ali so pogoji usklajevanja spo�tovani.
There must therefore be sufficient market transparency for each undertaking concerned to be aware, sufficiently precisely and quickly, of the way in which the market conduct of each of the other participants in the coordination is evolving.
Preglednost na trgu bi zato morala biti zadostna, da bi zlasti vsako zadevno podjetje lahko dovolj natančno in pravočasno prepoznalo spremembo ravnanja na trgu vseh drugih udeležencev usklajevanja. Zaradi discipline je potrebna neka oblika verodostojnega mehanizma odvračanja, ki ga je mogoče vzpostaviti, če se odkrije odstopanje.
In addition, the reactions of outsiders, such as current or future competitors, and also the reactions of customers, should not be such as to jeopardise the results expected from the coordination.
Poleg tega odzivi podjetij, ki ne sodelujejo pri usklajevanju, kot so sedanji ali prihodnji konkurenti, ter odzivi kupcev ne bi smeli postaviti pod vpra�aj pričakovanih rezultatov usklajevanja.
A collective dominant position significantly impeding effective competition in the common market or a substantial part of it may thus arise as the result of a concentration where, in view of the actual characteristics of the relevant market and of the alteration to those characteristics that the concentration would entail, the latter would make each member of the oligopoly in question, as it becomes aware of common interests, consider it possible, economically rational, and hence preferable, to adopt on a lasting basis a common policy on the market with the aim of selling at above competitive prices, without having to enter into an agreement or resort to a concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81 EC and without any actual or potential competitors, let alone customers or consumers, being able to react effectively.
Vendar se je pri uporabi teh meril treba izogniti temu avtomatičnemu pristopu, ki pomeni, da bi ločeno preverjali vsako posamezno od navedenih meril, pri čemer ne bi upo�tevali globalnega ekonomskega mehanizma hipotetičnega tihega usklajevanja.
Such tacit coordination is more likely to emerge if competitors can easily arrive at a common perception
Presoje na primer preglednosti nekega trga se ne sme opraviti ločeno in abstraktno, ampak glede na pravila mehanizma hipotetičnega tihega usklajevanja. Le ob upo�tevanju
In applying those criteria, it is necessary to avoid a mechanical approach involving the separate verification of each of those criteria taken in isolation, while taking no account of the overall economic mechanism of a hypothetical tacit coordination.
Verjetnost takega tihega usklajevanja je večja, če se lahko konkurenti zlahka sporazumejo glede načina, kako mora delovati usklajevanje, zlasti o parametrih, ki so lahko predmet načrtovanega usklajevanja.
In that regard, the assessment of, for example, the transparency of a particular market should not be undertaken in an isolated and abstract manner, but should be carried
Konkurenti bi se namreč morali, če se ne bi mogli molče sporazumeti o načinu usklajevanja, nazadnje
It is only if such a hypothesis is taken into account that it is possible to ascertain whether any elements of transparency that may exist on a market are, in fact, capable of facilitating the reaching of a common understanding on the terms of coordination and/or of allowing the competitors concerned to monitor sufficiently whether the terms of such a common policy are being adhered to.
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-413/06 P take predpostavke je namreč mogoče preveriti, ali morebitni elementi preglednosti, ki obstajajo na trgu, dejansko omogočajo ugotoviti, ali gre za molče potrjeno skupno ravnanje in/ali omogočajo zadevnim konkurentom, da v zadostni meri nadzorujejo, ali so pogoji takega ravnanja spo�tovani.
In that respect, it is necessary, in order to analyse the sustainability of a purported tacit coordination, to take into account the monitoring mechanisms that may be available to the participants in the alleged tacit coordination in order to ascertain whether, as a result of those mechanisms, they are in a position to be aware, sufficiently precisely and quickly, of the way in which the market conduct of each of the other participants in that coordination is evolving.
V zvezi s tem je treba za namene analize trajnosti domnevnega tihega usklajevanja upo�tevati mehanizme nadzora, ki so morda dostopni udeležencem zatrjevanega tihega usklajevanja, da bi se preverilo, ali bi lahko zaradi takih mehanizmov dovolj natančno in pravočasno prepoznali spremembo ravnanja na trgu vseh drugih udeležencev takega usklajevanja.
the substantive rules of Regulation No 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, in particular Article 2.
nadzoru koncentracij podjetij, zlasti njenega člena 2.
It follows that the review by the Community judicature of a Commission decision relating to concentrations is confined to ascertaining that the facts have been accurately stated and that there has been no manifest error of assessment.
Iz tega izhaja, da je nadzor, ki ga izvede sodi�če Skupnosti nad odločbo Komisije v zvezi s koncentracijami, omejen na preverjanje, ali je bilo pravilno ugotovljeno dejansko stanje in ali je bila storjena očitna napaka pri presoji.
That being so, while the Community judicature must not substitute its own economic assessment for that of the Commission for the purposes of applying the substantive rules of the regulation, that does not mean that it must refrain from reviewing the Commission’s interpretation of information of an economic nature.
Zato, čeprav sodi�če Skupnosti svoje presoje o ekonomskih vpra�anjih ne sme nadomestiti s presojo Komisije za namene izvedbe temeljnih pravil Uredbe, to ne pomeni, da se mora vzdržati nadzora pravne opredelitve podatkov ekonomske narave, ki jo je podala Komisija.
Not only must the Community judicature establish, among other things, whether the evidence relied on is factually accurate, reliable and consistent but also whether that evidence contains all the information which must be taken into account in order to assess a complex situation and whether it is capable of substantiating the conclusions drawn from it.
Sodi�če Skupnosti mora namreč med drugim – ob vsebinski pravilnosti navedenih dokazov, njihovi zanesljivosti in doslednosti – preveriti tudi, ali ti dokazi vsebujejo vse upo�tevne podatke, ki jih je treba upo�tevati pri presoji zapletene okoli�čine, in ali lahko utemeljijo iz njih izvedene sklepe.
(see paras 144, 145)
(Glej točki 144 in 145.)
Lastly, the investigation of a pre-existing collective dominant position based on a series of elements normally considered to be indicative of the presence or the likelihood of tacit coordination between competitors cannot be considered to be objectionable of itself.
Nazadnje, raziskovanja predhodnega kolektivnega prevladujočega položaja, ki temelji na več elementih, ki običajno �tejejo za pokazatelje obstoja ali verjetnosti obstoja tihega usklajevanja med konkurenti, ni mogoče izpodbijati kot takega.
However, it is essential that such an investigation be carried out with care and, above all, that it should adopt an approach based on the analysis of such plausible co -ordination strategies as may exist in the circumstances.
Vendar je treba tako raziskavo nujno izvesti s previdnostjo in predvsem na podlagi pristopa, ki temelji na analizi morebitnih sprejemljivih strategij usklajevanja.
(see paras 120-123, 125, 126, 129)
(Glej točke od 120 do 123, 125, 126 in 129.)
The Commission has a margin of assessment with regard to economic matters for the purposes of the application of
Komisija ima pravico do proste presoje ekonomskih vpra�anj za namene izvedbe temeljnih pravil Uredbe �t. 4064/89 o
The Commission does not infringe its duty to state reasons if, when exercising its power to examine concentrations, it does not include precise reasoning in its decision as to the appraisal of a number of aspects of the concentration which appear to it to be manifestly irrelevant or insignificant or plainly of secondary importance to the appraisal of the concentration.
Komisija ne kr�i obveznosti obrazložitve, če pri izvr�evanju svoje pristojnosti na področju nadzora koncentracij v odločbi ne razloži natančno presoje določenega �tevila vidikov koncentracije, ki se ji zdijo očitno neupo�tevni, nepomembni ali popolnoma drugotnega pomena za presojo koncentracije.
Such a requirement would be difficult to reconcile with the need for speed and the short timescales which the Commission is bound
Taka zahteva je namreč težko skladna z zahtevo po hitrosti in s kratkimi procesnimi roki,
to observe when exercising its power to examine concentrations and which form part of the particular circumstances of proceedings for control of those concentrations.
ki so naloženi Komisiji pri izvr�evanju njene pristojnosti na področju nadzora koncentracij in ki so del posebnih okoli�čin postopka nadzora koncentracij.
It follows that where the Commission declares a concentration to be compatible with the common market on the basis of Article 8(2) of Regulation No 4064/89 the requirement to state reasons is satisfied when that decision clearly sets out the reasons for which the Commission considers that the concentration in question, where appropriate following modification by the undertakings concerned, does not create or strengthen a dominant position as a result of which effective competition would be significantly impeded in the common market or in a substantial part of it.
Iz tega izhaja, da je takrat, kadar Komisija razglasi koncentracijo za združljivo s skupnim trgom na podlagi člena 8(2) Uredbe �t. 4064/89, zahteva po obrazložitvi izpolnjena, če so v tej odločbi jasno navedeni razlogi, zakaj Komisija meni, da zadevna koncentracija, morda po spremembah, ki so jih uvedla zadevna podjetja, ne ustvarja ali krepi prevladujočega položaja, ki lahko povzroči resno oviro za učinkovito konkurenco na skupnem trgu ali njegovem znatnem delu.
In that regard, while it is true that the Commission is not obliged, in the statement of reasons for decisions adopted under the regulation, to take a position on all the information and arguments relied on before it, including those which are plainly of secondary importance to the appraisal it is required to undertake, it none the less remains the case that it is required to set out the facts and the legal considerations having decisive importance in the context of the decision.
Čeprav je res, da Komisiji v obrazložitvi odločb, sprejetih na podlagi uredbe, ni treba sprejeti stali�ča glede vseh elementov in trditev, na katere se sklicuje, vključno s tistimi, ki so povsem drugotnega pomena za presojo, pa mora �e vedno navesti dejstva in pravne ugotovitve, ki so bistvene v strukturi odločbe.
The reasoning must in addition be logical and must not disclose any internal contradictions.
Poleg tega mora biti obrazložitev logična in zlasti ne sme vsebovati notranjih protislovij.
Article 10(6) of Regulation No 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings, the purpose of which is to ensure legal certainty where, exceptionally, the Commission has not adopted a decision within the prescribed period, with the result that the undertakings concerned are free to implement their concentration as soon as approval is deemed to have been given, cannot serve as a basis for an exception to the rule that a decision approving such a concentration may be challenged on the ground of infringement of the duty to state reasons any more than it can form the basis of a general presumption that concentrations are compatible with the common market.
Člen 10(6) Uredbe �t. 4064/89 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij, ki zagotavlja pravno varnost v primeru, če Komisija izjemoma ne bi sprejela odločbe v predpisanem roku, tako da bi bila zadevna podjetja prosta pri izvr�itvi koncentracije, saj je pri�lo do tihe odobritve, ne more biti podlaga za izjemo glede možnosti izpodbijanja zakonitosti odločbe o odobritvi te koncentracije zaradi kr�itve obveznosti obrazložitve in tudi ne more biti podlaga za splo�no domnevo o združljivosti koncentracij s skupnim trgom.