natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This communication of information enables all the Member States to be fully involved in the monitoring procedure laid down by the Directive.
Ta pravica pa ne izkljuｲuje naknadnih posegov Komisije, in si-cer ne po postopkih iz Direktive 98/34/ES, ｲe se poka™e, da je konｲno sprejet predpis v nasprotju s Pogodbo ali sekundarno zakonodajo.
The information which is circulated under the procedure is re-communicated by the Commission to all the Member States, « r s t l y i n t h e l a n g u a g e o ft h e n o t i f y i n g Mffe mb e r S t a t e a n d t h e n
V treh mesecih po priglasitvi osnutka (to obdobje ustreza ob-dobju mirovanja, omenjenega v ｲlenu 9(1)) Komisija in dr™ave
Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 9 March 1999 relating to radio and telecommunications terminal equipment, including the mutual recognition of their conformity, OJ L 91, 7.4.1999, p.1.
Direktiva 1999/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 1999 o radijski opremi in telekomunikacijski terminalski opremi, vkljuｲno z vzajemnim priznavanjem njene skladnosti, UL L 91, 7.4.1999, str. 10.
Directive 94/25/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 16 June 1994 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft, OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p.
Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 94/25/ES z dne 16. junija 1994 o pribli™evanju zakonov in drugih predpisov dr™av ｲlanic v zvezi s plovili za rekreacijo, UL L 164, 30.6.1994, str.
15 (amended by Directive 2003/44/EC of 16 June 2003, OJ L 214, 26.8.2003, p. 18).
15 (spremenjena z Direktivo 2003/44/ES z dne 16. junija 2003, UL L 214, 26.8.2003, str. 18).
See Annex 1 to this booklet.
Glej Prilogo 1 k tej knji™ici.Peprav Komisija dr™avi ｲlanici priglasiteljici ne poþlje odloｲitve, da se priglasitev ne spremlja, je to njena formalna odloｲitev.
34/EC, if the regulation as «nallyadoptedshouldprovetobecontrary to the Treaty or to secondary legislation.
Najpogostejþe krþitve teh doloｲb so v besedilu izpuþｲena klav-zula o vzajemnem priznavanju enakovrednih tehniｲnih speci«-kacij ali predpisov o storitvah, ki jih uvede druga dr™ava ｲlanica, ali dejstvo, da so nekatere doloｲbe osnutka nesorazmerne z ™e-lenim ciljem.
in the form of translations into all or some of the o/ciallan-guages of the Union.
Poleg tega se podrobno mnenje lahko nanaþa na krþitev direktive, uredbe ali odloｲbe o usklajevanju Skupnosti.
Second stage: possible reactions open to the Commission and the Member States
Pripombe se poþljejo, ko priglaþeno besedilo, kljub temu da je skladno s pravom Skupnosti, povzroｲa te™ave v zvezi z razlago, ali so potrebne podrobnosti o ukrepih za njegovo izvajanje.
During the three months following the noti«cationofadraft(this period corresponds to the standstill period referred to in Article 9(1)), the Commission and the Member States examine the n o t i « e d t e x t i n o r d e r t o a s c e r t a i n i t s c o m p a t i b i l i t y w i t h C o m mstu n i t y law, particularly with Articles 28 and 30, 43 and 49 of the Treaty, but also with the sectoral Directives involved, and to reach a decision, where necessary, on its consistency with the concerned provisions.
Po-dajajo lahko tudi sploþno oceno ukrepa ob upoþtevanju sploþ-nih naｲel prava Skupnosti in politik, ki se v tem okviru izvajajo, ali obveþｲajo dr™avo ｲlanico o njenih prihodnjih obveznostih v zvezi z akti, ki bodo sprejeti na ravni Skupnosti.
Comments are sent when the noti«edtext,althoughinaccord-ance with Community law, raises issues of interpretation or calls for details of the arrangements for its implementation.
Podrobno mnenje se nikakor ne sme izdati proti osnutkom predpisov, ki skuþajo doseｲi prepoved proizvodnje, ki pa ne po-menijo mo™ne ovire za prosti pretok blaga.
The results of this evaluation can give rise to two types of reac-tion by the Commission and the Member States (the Commis-sion has, in addition, a speci«coption:`blockage'ofthedraftasa result of harmonisation work, which will be examined below in the comments on Article 9 of the Directive).
Dr™ave ｲlanice morajo odgovoriti na podrobno mnenje, ki ga nanje naslovi Komisija ali druga dr™ava ｲlanica.
Directive 98/34/EC provides, in Article 8 (1) (last subparagraph), that the comments and detailed opinions issued with regard to technical speci«cations,`otherrequirements'orrulesonservic-es linked to «scalor«nancialmeasures,canonlyrelatetoas-pects which may create barriers to the free movement of goods or, in respect of rules on services, the free movement of services or the freedom of establishment of service operators, and not to the « s c a l o r « n a n c i a l s i d e o ft h e mffe a s u r e .
Direktiva 98/34/ES v ｲlenu 8(1) (zadnji pododstavek) predpisuje, da se lahko pripombe in podrobna mnenja, izdane v zvezi s teh-niｲnimi speci«kacijami,¶drugimizahtevamiƒalipredpisiostorit-vah, povezanimi z davｲnimi ali «nanｲnimiukrepi,nanaþajosamona tiste vidike, ki bi lahko povzroｲali ovire za prosti pretok blaga ali pri predpisih o storitvah prosti pretok storitev ali pravico do usta-navljanja dobaviteljev storitev, ne pa na davｲno ali «nanｲnoplatukrepa.
T h e Mffe mb e r S t a t e s ' « s c a l po w e r s a r e t h uffs n o tffu n d e r s c r uijt i n y i n t h i s r e s p e c t .
V tem primeru se torej ne raziskujejo davｲne pristojnosti dr™av ｲlanic.
T h e d r a ft s concerned also bene«tfromspecialtreatmentwithre-gard to the standstill periods (see Article 10(4): no period is laid down for the adoption of these texts by Member States).
Za osnutke velja tudi posebna obravnava v zvezi z obdobji mirovanja (glej ｲlen 10(4): obdobje, v katerem bi morale dr™ave ｲlanice sprejeti ta besedila, ni doloｲeno).
Under the Directive, the notifying Member State has no formal obligation to reply to the comments received.
V skladu z Direktivo dr™ava ｲlanica priglasiteljica nima nobene formalne obveznosti, da odgovori na prejete pripombe.
In practice, how-ever, the Member State frequently does so on a voluntary basis and this increases the dialogue.
V prak-si pa dr™ave ｲlanice to pogosto prostovoljno naredijo in tako dialog razþirijo.
In this case, neither the Commission nor the Member States re-act during the three-month period.
Pe Komisija meni, da je odgovor na njeno podrobno mnenje nezadovoljiv, lahko v primeru dejanskega sprejetja osnutka uporabi postopek, omenjen v ｲlenu 226 Pogodbe.
At the end of this period, the notifying Member State can adopt its draft regulation, without further obligation.
V enakem primeru ima dr™ava ｲlanica pravico, da ob sprejetju priglaþene-ga osnutka spro™i postopek za ugotavljanje krþitev, predviden s ｲlenom 227 Pogodbe.
This right does not, however, exclude subsequent intervention by the Commission, outside the procedure under Directive 98/
Direktiva doloｲa, da morajo dr™ave ｲlanice ¶ｲimboljƒ upoþtevati pripombe (ｲlen 8(2)).
The Directive stipulates that the Member States must take com-ments into account `as far as possible' (Article 8(2)). Member
Dr™ave ｲlanice ponavadi res upoþtevajo pripombe, ki jih dobijo.
States do, however, generally take account of the comments they receive.
Posledice takþnega odziva, ki ga lahko uporabi samo Komisija, so opisane v ｲlenu 9(3), (4) in (5) Direktive.
The obligation to observe the standstill periods
Obvezno upoþtevanje obdobij mirovanja
Fur-thermore, the detailed opinion may relate to a breach of a Com-munity harmonisation directive, a regulation or a decision.
Dr™ave ｲlanice prelo™ijo sprejetje osnutka tehniｲnega predpisa za tri mesece od dneva, ko Komisija prejme sporoｲilo, navedeno v ｲlenu 8(1).
by the Commission of the communication referred to in Article 8(1) if the Commission or another Member State delivers a de-tailed opinion, within three months of that date, to the e.ectthat the measure envisaged may create obstacles to the free movement of services or to the freedom of establishment of service operators within the internal market.
› sprejetje osnutka tehniｲnega predpisa v obliki prostovoljnega dogovora v smislu druge alinee drugega pododstavka toｲke 11 ｲlena 1 za þtiri mesece,
In addition to this period, the notifying Member State is subject to an additional standstill period, varying in length according to the nature of the text and the type of reaction it receives.
Doloｲba ｲlena 9 se nanaþa na ｲasovno razporeditev, potrebno za priglasitev.
Although comments sent to the Member State do not result in an extension of the initial three-month standstill period, the same does not apply to detailed opinions sent by the Commis-sion or the other Member States.
Datum, ko Komisija prejme osnutek nacionalne-ga tehniｲnega predpisa, ki ga poþlje dr™ava ｲlanica, in vse za-htevane dokumente, oznaｲuje zaｲetek obdobja, v katerem za-devna dr™ava ｲlanica nedvomno ne sme sprejeti zadevnega osnutka.
With regard to draft rules on services, detailed opinions from the Commission or Member States may not a.ectanyculturalpolicymeasures, in particular in the audiovisual sphere, which Member States might adopt in accordance with Community law, taking into account of their linguistic diversity, their speci«cnationalandregional characteristics and their cultural heritage.
› sprejetje kakrþnega koli drugega osnutka tehniｲnega predpisa (razen osnutkov predpisov o storitvah), brez poseganja v od-stavke 3, 4 in 5, za þest mesecev od dneva, ko Komisija prejme sporoｲilo iz ｲlena 8(1), ｲe Komisija ali druga dr™ava ｲlanica v treh mesecih po zgoraj navedenem dnevu poda podrobno mnenje, da bi lahko predvideni ukrep ustvaril ovire za prost pretok blaga na notranjem trgu;
The Member State concerned shall report to the Commission on the action it proposes to take on such detailed opinions.
Obdobje treh mesecev iz ｲlena 9(1) je zaｲetno obdobje mirova-nja.
The Com-mission shall comment on this reaction.
Predstavlja obdobje, ki se þteje za potrebno, da bi Komisija in druge dr™ave ｲlanice lahko pregledale besedilo osnutka in se po potrebi nanj odzvale.
In the event of a detailed opinion relating to a voluntary agree-ment, the Directive stipulates that the Member States must re-spect a standstill period of four months (Article 9(2)).
Poleg tega obdobja za dr™avo ｲlanico priglasiteljico velja do-datno obdobje mirovanja, ki je razliｲno dolgo glede na naravo besedila in vrsto odziva, ki ga dr™ava prejme.
It adds only one month to the initial standstill period so that the Mem-ber States do not lose time in gaining the bene«tofmeasures,the e.ectivenessofwhichisasatisfactoryalternativetolegisla-tion.
Peprav zaradi pri-pomb, poslanih dr™avi ｲlanici, ni potrebno podaljþanje zaｲet-nega trimeseｲnega obdobja mirovanja, ne velja enako za po-drobna mnenja, ki jih poþlje Komisija ali druge dr™ave ｲlanice.
With respect to rules on services, the Member States concerned shall indicate, where appropriate, the reasons why the detailed opinions cannot be taken into account.
› brez poseganja v odstavka 4 in 5 za þtiri mesece prelo™ijo spre-jetje kakrþnega koli osnutka predpisa o storitvah od dneva, ko Komisija prejme sporoｲilo iz ｲlena 8(1), ｲe Komisija ali druga dr-™ava ｲlanica v treh mesecih od zgoraj navedenega dneva poda podrobno mnenje, da bi lahko predvideni ukrep ustvaril ovire v prostem pretoku storitev ali svobodi ustanavljanja in delovanja dobaviteljev storitev na notranjem trgu.
One should point out that the same `additional one-month rule' applies in the event of a detailed opinion concerning draft rules on Information Society services.
V primeru podrobnega mnenja, ki se nanaþa na prostovoljni dogovor, Direktiva doloｲa, da morajo dr™ave ｲlanice spoþtovati obdobje mirovanja þtirih mesecev (ｲlen 9(2)).
The standstill period is extended to six months for all other drafts which are the subject of a detailed opinion.
Kar zadeva osnutke predpisov o storitvah, podrobna mnenja Ko-misije ali dr™av ｲlanic ne smejo zadevati katerega koli ukrepa kul-turne politike, zlasti na avdiovizualnem podroｲju, ki ga dr™ave ｲlanice lahko sprejmejo v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti ob upoþtevanju njihove jezikovne raznolikosti, posebnih dr™avnih in regionalnih znaｲilnosti ter kulturne dediþｲine.
Article 9 relates to the timing involved in noti«cation.Thedateof receipt by the Commission of the draft national technical regulation communicated by a Member State and of all the re-quested documents is the signal for the beginning of a period during which the Member State concerned is strictly obliged not to adopt the draft in question.
Opozoriti je treba, da se enako ¶pravilo dodatnega mesecaƒ uporablja v primeru podrobnega mnenja, ki zadeva osnutek predpisa o storitvah informacijske dru™be.
This period is commonly known as the standstill period.
Zadevna dr™ava ｲlanica sporoｲi Komisiji, kakþen ukrep predlaga v zvezi z zgoraj omenjenimi mnenji.
The three-month period referred to in Article 9(1) is the initial standstill period.
Obdobje mirovanja se podaljþa na þest mesecev za vse druge osnutke, ki so predmet podrobnega mnenja.
It represents the period which is considered to be necessary in order to allow the Commission and the other
V zvezi s predpisi o storitvah zadevna dr™ava ｲlanica obrazlo™i, ka-dar je primerno, zakaj ni mogoｲe upoþtevati podrobnih mnenj.
With the exception of: a) urgent cases, b) laws, regulations or administrative provisions by Member States prohibiting manufacture, as long as these do not form barriers to the free movement of goods (see Article 10(2)), c) technical s p e c i « c a t i o n s o r o t h e r r e q u i r e mffe n t s l i n k e d w i t h « n a n c i a l o r « s c a l mffe a s u r e s ( s e e A r t i c l e 1 0 ( 4 ) ) .
Razen: a) nujnih primerov, b) zakonov in drugih predpisov dr™av ｲlanic, ki prepovedujejo proizvodnjo, kolikor ne predstavljajo ovire za prosti pretok blaga (glej ｲlen 10(2)), c) tehniｲnih speci«kacijalidrugihzahtev,povezanihs«nanｲnimialidavｲnimiukrepi(glejｲlen10(4)).
Paragraph (3) covers the « r s t c a s e : t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n n o u n c - e s its intention to propose or adopt a directive, regulation or decision (in other words any of the binding Community acts under Article 249 (former Article 189) of the Treaty on the same subject as the text of the draft technical regulation.
Odstavek (3) zajema prvi primer: Komisija izjavi, da namerava predlagati ali sprejeti direktivo, uredbo ali odloｲbo (z drugimi besedami, katerega koli od zavezujoｲih aktov Skupnosti) v skla-du s ｲlenom 249 (prejþnji ｲlen 189) Pogodbe o isti zadevi kakor besedilo osnutka tehniｲnega predpisa.
these measures are suited to eliminate the barriers to the free movement of goods, the free movement of services or the free-dom of establishment of service operators which may have re-sulted from the adoption of the text, or whether the justi«ca-tion given for retaining the text is acceptable.
Dr™ava ｲlanica, na katero je tako mnenje naslovljeno, mora ob-vestiti Komisijo o ukrepih, ki jih namerava sprejeti (preklic spor-nega besedila, utemeljitev za njegovo obdr™anje ali spremem-ba nekaterih doloｲb, da bi postale zdru™ljive s pravili notranjega trga), ne glede na to, ali je avtor druga dr™ava ｲlanica in/ali Ko-misija.
This paragraph does not specify what is meant by `the inten-tion' to propose, but it concerns an intention that has been ex-plicitly expressed, for example through inclusion in the Com-mission's annual legislative programme.
Dejstvo, da je Komisija v postop-ku priprave osnutka akta Skupnosti, ne more upraviｲiti obdobja ｲakanja dvanajstih mesecev za zadevno dr™avo ｲlanico.
With the exclusion of draft rules relating to services, Member States shall postpone the adoption of a draft technical regulation for 12 months from the date of receipt by the Commission of the communication referred to in Article 8 (1) if, within the three months following that date, the Commission announces its inten-tion of proposing or adopting a directive, regulation or decision on the matter in accordance with Article 189 of the Treaty.
Dr™ave ｲlanice odlo™ijo sprejetje osnutka tehniｲnega predpisa za 12 mesecev od dneva, ko Komisija sprejme sporoｲilo, navedeno v ｲlenu 8(1), ｲe v treh mesecih po zgoraj navedenem dnevu Komi-sija izjavi, da je ugotovila, da se osnutek tehniｲnega predpisa nanaþa na podroｲje, ki je obravnavano v predlogu za direktivo, uredbo ali odloｲbo, predstavljeno Svetu skladno s ｲlenom 189 Pogodbe.
The fact that the Commission is in the process of drawing up a draft Community act is not su/cienttojustifya waitingperiodoftwelvemonthsfor the Member State concerned.
V drugem primeru (odstavek (4)) Komisija ugotovi, da se pri-glaþeni osnutek tehniｲnega predpisa nanaþa na zadevo, zajeto v predlogu direktive, uredbe ali odloｲbe, ki je predlo™en Svetu.
If the Council adopts a common position during the standstill period referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4, that period shall, subject to paragraph 6, be extended to 18 months.
Pe Svet sprejme skupno staliþｲe med obdobjem mirovanja, ki je navedeno v odstavkih 3 in 4, se to obdobje v skladu z odstavkom 6 podaljþa na 18 mesecev.
Paragraphs (3), (4) and (5) of Article 9 stipulate much longer standstill periods as a result of the blockage imposed by the Commission - and by the Commission alone - following exami-nation of the draft.
Odstavki (3), (4) in (5) ｲlena 9 doloｲajo veliko daljþe obdobje mirovanja zaradi blokade Komisije › in samo Komisije › po pregledu osnutka.
Paragraph (5) envisages the third s p e c i « c c a s e , w h e n t h e C o u n c i l adopts a common position during the twelve-month blockage imposed in the two previous situations.
Odstavek (5) predvideva tretji posebni primer, kadar Svet sprejme skupno staliþｲe med dvanajstmeseｲno blokado, ki se uvede v prejþnjih dveh situacijah.
It should be emphasised that the `common position' referred to represents a stage of the Community legislative process under the procedures of co-operation and co-decision, the «rstin-volving the European Parliament in the Council's decision-mak-ing power and the second giving it the power to adopt, jointly with the Council, certain regulations, decisions and directives.
Poudariti je treba, da navedeno ¶skupno staliþｲeƒ predstavlja stopnjo zakonodajnega procesa Skupnosti v okviru postopkov sodelovanja in soodloｲanja, pri ｲemer je v prvem postopku Evropski parlament udele™en v postopku odloｲanja Sveta, v drugem pa je pristojen, da skupaj s Svetom sprejme nekatere uredbe, odloｲbe in direktive.
These standstill obligations also lapse when the Council, to-gether with the Parliament in case of co-decision, or when the Commission adopts the announced binding Community act.
Ta dva postopka zagotavljata drugo branje besedila v Parla-mentu, kar razlo™i potrebo po podaljþanju obdobja mirovanja.
Paragraphs 1 to 5 shall not apply in cases where:
Obveznosti, navedene v odstavkih (3), (4) in (5), prenehajo:
These two procedures provide for a second reading of the text by the Parliament, which explains the need to extend the standstill period.
› mora dr™ava ｲlanica zaradi nujnih razlogov, ki jih povzroｲijo resne in nepredvidljive okoliþｲine v zvezi z zaþｲito javnega zdravja ali varnosti, zaþｲito ™ivali ali ohranitvijo rastlin, zaradi predpisov o storitvah in tudi javne politike, zlasti zaþｲite mlado-letnikov, pripraviti tehniｲne predpise v zelo kratkem ｲasu, da bi jih lahko takoj sprejela in uveljavila, pri ｲemer niso mogoｲi kakrþni koli posveti;
› when the Commission informs the Member States that it no long-er intends to propose or adopt a binding Community act,
› kadar Komisija obvesti dr™ave ｲlanice o preklicu svojega osnutka ali predloga,
› for urgent reasons, occasioned by serious and unforeseeable circumstances relating to the protection of public health or safety, the protection of animals or the preservation of plants and, for rules on services, also for public policy, notably the pro-tection of minors, a Member State is obliged to prepare techni-cal regulations in a very short space of time in order to enact and introduce them immediately without any consultations be-ing possible or
› mora dr™ava ｲlanica zaradi nujnih razlogov, ki jih povzroｲijo resne okoliþｲine v zvezi z zaþｲito varnosti in neokrnjenosti «-nanｲnega sistema, zlasti zaþｲito deponentov, vlagateljev in za-varovanih oseb, takoj sprejeti in izvajati predpise o «nanｲnihstoritvah.
› when the Commission informs the Member States of the with-drawal of its draft or proposal,
› kadar Komisija ali Svet sprejme zavezujoｲi akt Skupnosti.
Paragraph (6) concerns the expiry of the standstill periods im-posed on the Member States in the case of the Commission blocking a draft technical regulation.
Odstavek (6) zadeva prenehanje obdobij mirovanja, ki se nanaþajo na dr™ave ｲlanice, kadar Komisija blokira osnutek tehniｲnega predpisa.
In the communication referred to in Article 8, the Member State shall give reasons for the urgency of the measures taken.
Dr™ava ｲlanica v sporoｲilu iz ｲlena 8 navede razloge za nujnost sprejetih ukrepov.
The Commission shall give its views on the communication as soon as possible.
Komisija ｲimprej predstavi svoja staliþｲa o spo-roｲilu.
It shall take appropriate action in cases where improper use is made of this procedure.
Kadar se ta postopek uporabi neprimerno, Komisija sprej-me ustrezne ukrepe.
The European Parliament shall be kept informed by the Commission.
Komisija sproti obveþｲa Evropski parlament.
Since blockage postpones the adoption of national legislation without precise knowledge of the length of the process which will lead to the « n a l a p p r o v a l o f C o m mstu n i t y l effg i s l a t i o n , t h e C o m m i s s i o n uses this instrument with caution.
Ker blokada odlo™i sprejetje nacionalne zakonodaje, ne da bi bila natanｲno znana dol™ina procesa, potrebna za odobritev zakonodaje Skupnosti, je Komisija previdna pri uporabi tega instrumenta.
It is logical that, where Community action which is envisaged or in progress does not produce a result, the standstill obliga-tions imposed by paragraphs (3), (4) and (5) should lapse in or-der to allow the Member States to complete the postponed
Logiｲno je, da obveznosti obdobja mirovanja iz odstavkov (3), (4) in (5) prenehajo, da bi lahko dr™ave ｲlanice zakljuｲile odlo™e-no zakonodajno delo na nacionalni ravni in sprejele tehniｲni
This paragraph provides that the standstill periods are not ap-plicable when a Member State, in order to respond to an urgent and unforeseeable situation such as, for example, a natural dis-aster (the need to protect people, the atmosphere, soil or wa-ter), an epidemic, an animal epidemic, etc., is obliged to pre-
Ta odstavek doloｲa, da se obdobja mirovanja ne uporabljajo, kadar mora dr™ava ｲlanica za to, da se odzove na nujne in ne-predvidljive situacije, kot so na primer naravne nesreｲe (potre-ba po zaþｲiti ljudi, atmosfere, tal ali vode), epidemije, epidemije pri ™ivalih itd., pripraviti tehniｲne predpise za takojþnjo uvedbo, ne da bi imela ｲas, da se vnaprej posvetuje s Komisijo in drugi-mi dr™avami ｲlanicami.
Exceptions to the obligation to notify or observe standstill periods
Izjeme od obveznosti priglasitve ali upoþtevanja obdobij mirovanja
This Article supplements Articles 8 and 9 of the Directive, by stating the statutory exceptions to the obligation to notify a draft national technical regulation.
Ta ｲlen dopolnjuje ｲlena 8 in 9 Direktive tako, da navaja z zakonom doloｲene izjeme od obveznosti priglasitve osnutka nacionalnega tehniｲnega predpisa.
It also provides for certain exceptions to the obligation to comply with the standstill peri-ods stipulated in Article 9.
Predvideva tudi nekatere izjeme od obvez-nosti upoþtevanja obdobij mirovanja, doloｲenih v ｲlenu 9.
Articles 8 and 9 shall not apply to those laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States or voluntary agreements by means of which Member States:
Plena 8 in 9 ne veljata za zakone in druge predpise dr™av ｲlanic ali prostovoljne dogovore, s katerimi dr™ave ｲlanice:
› comply with binding Community acts which result in the adop-tion of technical speci«cationsorrulesonservices;
Sklicevanje na klavzulo o nujnosti je mogoｲe tudi za predpise, ki se nanaþajo na «nanｲnestoritve,kadargrezanujnerazloge,ki se pojavijo zaradi resnih okoliþｲin v zvezi z varnostjo in celo-vitostjo «nanｲnegasistema,zlastizaþｲitevlagateljev,investi-torjev in zavarovanih oseb.