natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the light of the information provided by the referring court, there does not appear to be anything to link the dispute in the main proceedings to Community law.
Na podlagi informacij predložitvenega sodi�ča se ne zdi, da bi spor o glavni stvari vseboval dejavnik, povezan s pravom Skupnosti.
According to that information, Mr Doulamis pursues his activities in Belgium, where he is established, and has been prosecuted in that Member State for having placed advertisements in a national telephone directory.
Na podlagi teh informacij namreč I. Doulamis svoje dejavnosti opravlja v Belgiji, kjer ima sedež in je bil v tej državi članici proti njemu začet kazenski postopek, ker je objavljal oglase v nacionalnem imeniku.
Moreover, it is clear from the documents before the Court that he obtained his qualifications as a dental prosthetics technician and in business management in Belgium.
Poleg tega iz spisovnega gradiva izhaja, da je svoji diplomi tehnika za zobno protetiko in poslovodjo podjetja pridobil v Belgiji.
Finally, the referring court does not indicate that Mr Doulamis has moved within the Community in order to exercise his profession.
Nazadnje, predložitveno sodi�če ni navedlo, da bi se I. Doulamis zaradi opravljanja poklica preselil znotraj Skupnosti.
It is also consistent with settled caselaw as regards both that fundamental freedom 40and the freedom to provide services. 41
ustaljeno sodno prakso tako glede te temeljne svobode 40 kot tudi glede svobode opravljanja storitev. 41
The only factor which is external to Belgium, on the basis of the information provided to the Court, is Mr Doulamis’s place of birth, in Greece.
Edini dejavnik, ki je zunaj Belgije, je na podlagi navedb, predloženih Sodi�ču, rojstni kraj I. Doulamisa, ki je v Grčiji.
It is true that whether the Treaty provisions on those freedoms of movement are applicable depends on whether there is a
Res je, da se določbe Pogodbe o teh pravicah prostega pretoka uporabljajo, če obstaja zunanji dejavnik. V skladu z ustaljeno
40 — See, in particular, Case C-108/96 Mac Quen and Others [2001] ECR I-837, paragraph 24.
40 – Glej zlasti sodbo z dne 1. februarja 2001 v zadevi Mac Quen in drugi (C-108/96, Recueil, str. I-837, točka 24).
43 — See, with regard to a therapist, Joined Cases C-54/88, C-91/88 and C-14/89 Nino and Others [1990] ECR I-3537, paragraph 11.
43 – Glede terapevta glej sodbo z dne 3. oktobra 1990 v združenih zadevah Nino in drugi (C-54/88, C-91/88 in C-14/89, Recueil, str. I-3537, točka 11).
OPINION OF MR BOT — CASE C-446/05 movement of goods in Guimont, 44 has been applied in the context of the other freedoms of movement.
Skupnosti. Ta sodna praksa, ki je bila v okviru prostega pretoka blaga vzpostavljena s sodbo z dne 5. decembra 2000 v zadevi Guimont, 44 se je uporabila v okviru drugih pravic o prostem pretoku.
45 absence of information on Mr Doulamis’s nationality, his place of birth alone is not sufficient to establish that he is in the position of a Community national wishing to pursue an activity as a selfemployed person in a Member State other than his State of origin.
45 zadevne osebe zgolj njegov rojstni kraj ne zado�ča za ugotovitev, da je v položaju državljana Skupnosti, ki želi opravljati neodvisno dejavnost v državi članici, ki ni njegova država izvora.
It will be for the referring court to verify that point and to examine whether Mr Doulamis is a national of a Member State other than the Kingdom of Belgium.
Predložitveno sodi�če mora to preveriti in preučiti, ali je I. Doulamis državljan druge države članice in ne Kraljevine Belgije.
Moreover, it may be inferred from the grounds of the order for reference that the Tribunal de première instance de Bruxelles is seeking to assess the compatibility of its national legislation not only with Article 81 EC, read in conjunction with Article 3(1)(g) EC and the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, but also with the rules of the common market aimed at establishing a single market, which necessarily includes those relating to the freedoms of movement.
Poleg tega je mogoče iz razlogov predložitvene odločbe izpeljati, da želi Tribunal de première instance iz Bruslja presoditi združljivost svoje nacionalne zakonodaje, ne le glede na člen 81 ES v povezavi s členoma 3(1)(g) ES in 10, drugi odstavek, ES, ampak tudi glede na pravila skupnega trga, ki se nana�ajo na vzpostavitev enotnega trga, kar nujno vključuje pravila, povezana s pravicami prostega pretoka.
If that is not so, the fact that the dispute in the main proceedings may be devoid of any crossborder element should not, however, discharge the Court from its obligation to provide the referring court with the information needed in order to assess the compatibility of the Law of 1958 with Articles 43 EC and 49 EC.
Če ni tako, pa dejstvo, da v takem primeru spor o glavni stvari nima nobenega zunanjega dejavnika, vendarle ne bi smelo razbremeniti Sodi�ča, da bi predložitvenemu sodi�ču posredovalo elemente, potrebne za presojo združljivosti zakona iz leta 1958 s členoma 43 ES in 49 ES.
Finally, it should be recalled that, in the procedure laid down by Article 234 EC providing for cooperation between national courts and the Court of Justice, it is for the latter to provide the national court with an answer which will be of use to it and enable it to determine the case before it, 46 and that, in accordance with settled caselaw, the Court
Nazadnje je treba opozoriti, da je v okviru postopka sodelovanja iz člena 234 ES naloga Sodi�ča, da nacionalnemu sodi�ču poda ustrezen odgovor, ki slednjemu omogoči obravnavo spora, ki mu je bil predložen, 46 in da mora Sodi�če v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso razlagati vse določbe prava Skupnosti,
45 — See, with regard to the free movement of capital, Joined Cases C-515/99, C-519/99 to C-524/99 and C-526/99 to C-540/99 Reisch and Others [2002] ECR I-2157, paragraph 26, and Case C-300/01 Salzmann [2003] ECR I-4899, paragraph 33.
45 – Glede prostega pretoka kapitala glej sodbi z dne 5. marca 2002 v združenih zadevah Reisch in drugi (C-515/99, od C-519/99 do C-524/99 in od C-526/99 do C-540/99, Recueil, str. I-2157, točka 26) in z dne 15. maja 2003 v zadevi Salzmann (C-300/01, Recueil, str.
46 — See, in particular, Case C-45/06 Campina [2007] ECR I-2089, paragraph 30 and the caselaw cited.
46 – Glej zlasti sodbo z dne 8. marca 2007 v zadevi Campina (C-45/06, ZOdl., str. I-2089, točka 30 in navedena sodna praksa).
It is clear from the caselaw of the Court that it will interpret the scope of the freedoms of movement guaranteed by the Treaty where the dispute in the main proceedings does not contain any crossborder element, on the ground that that interpretation may be useful to the national court in resolving the dispute which has been brought before it in the main proceedings, in circumstances where the national court is bound by its domestic law to allow a national to enjoy the same rights as those which a national of another Member State would derive from Community law in the same situation. That caselaw, which was established in the context of the free
Iz sodne prakse Sodi�ča namreč izhaja, da Sodi�če prevzema razlago obsega pravic prostega pretoka, ki so zagotovljene v Pogodbi, tudi če spor o glavni stvari ne vsebuje zunanjih dejavnikov, ker bi lahko ta razlaga predložitvenemu sodi�ču koristila za re�itev spora o glavni stvari, o katerem odloča, kadar bi mu notranje pravo nalagalo, naj svojemu državljanu prizna enake pravice, kot bi jih imel državljan druge države članice, ki je v enakem položaju, na podlagi prava
DOULAMIS accordance with the caselaw of the Court, that article not only requires the abolition of discriminatory measures but is also applicable, according to the very broad expression often used by the Court, to ‘all measures which prohibit, impede or render less attractive the exercise of that freedom’.
DOULAMIS glede na potrebe predložitvenega sodi�ča, tudi če te določbe niso navedene v vpra�anjih, ki jih je postavilo predložitveno sodi�če, kadar mu je slednje predložilo dejanske in pravne elemente, ki omogočajo to razlago.
48 has a duty to provide interpretations of all the provisions of Community law which the national court needs for that purpose, even if those provisions are not expressly indicated in the questions referred to it by that court, provided that the latter has furnished the Court with the factual and legal material necessary to enable such an interpretation to be given. 47
47 treba ga je uporabiti, v skladu s pomensko �irokim izrazom, ki ga je pogosto uporabilo Sodi�če, za „vsakr�ne ukrepe, ki prepovedujejo, ovirajo ali napravijo uživanje te pravice manj zanimivo“. 48
The restrictions covered in this way by Article 43 EC include measures which, even though they apply without distinction, affect the conditions for pursuing the activity concerned and have the effect of depriving an economic operator of an effective means of competing with a view to penetrating a market. 49
Med omejitvami, ki se tako nana�ajo na člen 43 ES, so ukrepi, ki, čeprav se uporabljajo brez razlike, vplivajo na način opravljanja zadevne dejavnosti in ki gospodarskemu subjektu odvzemajo učinkovito sredstvo konkurence za njegov prodor na trg. 49
I am therefore of the opinion that the referring court should be given guidance as to the scope of Articles 43 EC and 49 EC which will be of use to it in resolving the dispute in the main proceedings.
Zato menim, da je treba predložitvenemu sodi�ču podati upo�tevne navedbe glede obsega členov 43 ES in 49 ES za re�itev spora o glavni stvari.
Accordingly, I shall set out in turn the reasons why a law of a Member State such as the Law of 1958, in prohibiting dental care providers from engaging in advertising of any kind of their services to the general public, constitutes a restriction within the meaning of those articles.
Tako bom v nadaljevanju navedel, v čem zakon države članice, kot je zakon iz leta 1958, v delu, v katerem ponudnikom zobozdravstvenih storitev prepoveduje kakr�no koli ogla�evanje svojih storitev, pomeni omejitev v smislu teh členov.
I shall then indicate the extent to which such a restriction may be justified.
V nadaljevanju bom navedel, v kolik�ni meri je lahko taka omejitev upravičena.
That appears to me to be true of the legislation of a Member State which prohibits advertising of any kind in the dental care sector.
Tak naj bi bil primer zakonodaje države članice, ki prepoveduje vsakr�no ogla�evanje na področju zobozdravstva.
(a) Whether there is a restriction within the meaning of Articles 43 EC and 49 EC
a) Obstoj omejitve v smislu členov 43 ES in 49 ES
The importance of advertising in gaining access to a market has already been highlighted by the Court on a number of occasions in the area of the free movement of goods.
Pomen ogla�evanja za dostop na trg je večkrat poudarilo Sodi�če v okviru prostega pretoka blaga.
The freedom of establishment provided for in Article 43 EC includes the right to take up an occupation as a selfemployed person in another Member State and to pursue that occupation there on a permanent basis. In
Pravica do ustanavljanja iz člena 43 ES vključuje pravico dostopa do samostojne dejavnosti v drugi državi članici in pravico do stalnega opravljanja te dejavnosti v tej državi. V skladu s sodno prakso Sodi�ča ta člen ne določa le odprave diskriminatornih ukrepov;
48 — See, in particular, Case C-442/02 CaixaBank France [2004] ECR I-8961, paragraph 11 and the caselaw cited.
48 – Glej zlasti sodbo z dne 5. oktobra 2004 v zadevi CaixaBank France (C-442/02, ZOdl., str. I-8961, točka 11 in navedena sodna praksa).
47 — See, in particular, Case C-152/03 Ritter­Coulais [2006] ECR I-1711, paragraph 29 and the caselaw cited.
47 – Glej zlasti sodbo z dne 21. februarja 2006 v zadevi Ritter-Coulais (C-152/03, ZOdl., str.
49 — See, as regards the French rules prohibiting the remuneration of sight accounts, CaixaBank France, paragraph 12.
I-1711, točka 29 in navedena sodna praksa).
In Gourmet International Products, 51the Court gave a ruling on legislation prohib-
V sodbi z dne 8. marca 2001 v zadevi Gourmet International Products 51se je
In Douwe Egberts, 54the Court reached the same conclusion as in Gourmet Interna­tional Products in relation to national legislation prohibiting references in the advertising of foodstuffs to slimming and to medical recommendations, attestations, declarations or statements of approval.
V sodbi z dne 15. julija 2004 v zadevi Douwe Egberts 54je Sodi�če pri�lo do istega zaključka kot v zgoraj navedeni sodbi Gourmet International Products, in sicer glede nacionalnega zakona, ki pri ogla�evanju živil prepoveduje omenjanje huj�anja in zdravni�kih priporočil, potrdil, izjav in mnenj ali celo izjav o učinkovitosti proizvoda.
iting, with a few insignificant exceptions, the directing of any advertising messages for alcoholic beverages at consumers.
Sodi�če opredelilo glede zakonodaje, ki prepoveduje vsako ogla�evanje alkoholnih pijač, ki je naslovljeno na potro�nike, z določenimi zanemarljivimi izjemami.
It held that such a prohibition on advertising must be regarded as affecting the marketing of products from other Member States more heavily than the marketing of domestic products and as therefore constituting an obstacle to trade between Member States caught by Article 28 EC. 52
Menilo je, da je treba tako prepoved ogla�evanja �teti, kot da močneje vpliva na trženje proizvodov iz drugih držav članic, kot na trženje nacionalnih proizvodov, in da posledično pomeni oviro trgovini med državami članicami, ki sodi na področje uporabe člena 28 ES. 52
The Court based that analysis on the fact that, in the case of products such as alcoholic beverages, the consumption of which is linked to traditional social practices and to local habits and customs, a prohibition of all advertising directed at consumers in the form of advertisements in the press, on the radio and on television, the direct mailing of unsolicited material or the placing of posters
Sodi�če je to analizo oprlo na ugotovitev, da pri proizvodih, kot so alkoholne pijače, katerih potro�nja je povezana s tradicionalno družbeno prakso ter lokalnimi navadami in običaji, prepoved slehernega ogla�evanja,
It appears to me that the grounds on which the Court reached such a conclusion when interpreting Article 28 EC with respect to a ban on the advertising of goods can be applied to the interpretation of Article 43 EC in connection with the legislation of a Member State which prohibits dental care providers from engaging in advertising of any kind of their services.
Razloge, zaradi katerih je Sodi�če v okviru razlage člena 28 ES pri�lo do takega zaključka glede prepovedi ogla�evanja blaga, je mogoče prenesti na okvir razlage čle -na 43 ES v zvezi z zakonodajo države članice, ki ponudnikom zobozdravstvenih storitev prepoveduje kakr�no koli ogla�evanje svojih storitev.
51 — Case C-405/98 [2001] ECR I-1795.52 — Paragraph 25.
I-1795.52 – Točka 25.
53 — Paragraph 21.54 — Case C-239/02 [2004] ECR I-7007, paragraph 53.
53 – Točka 21.54 – C-239/02, ZOdl., str. I-7007, točka 53.
DOULAMIS met with significant obstacles and in which the need for mutual recognition has led to extremely wide-ranging harmonisation by the Community legislature.
DOULAMIS sooča z velikimi ovirami in na katerem je vzajemno priznanje zahtevalo zelo obsežno usklajevanje na strani normodajalca Skupnosti.
In my opinion, the relationship between a patient and a treatment provider is stronger than the relationship with a product, which results merely from consumer habits.
Odnos med pacientom in ponudnikom zdravstvenih storitev po mojem mnenju namreč po intenzivnosti presega povezavo s proizvodom, ki temelji le na potro�ni�kih navadah.
In the healthcare sector, that relationship is based on the patient’s trust in the service provider as an individual or in a healthcare establishment and the need for quality in respect of such services is clearly of the highest.
Ta odnos na področju zdravstvenih storitev temelji na zaupanju pacienta v osebo ponudnika ali zdravstveno ustanovo in se nana�a na storitve, glede katerih je zahteva po kakovosti občutno vi�ja.
That trust is based initially on the reputation of the professional or the healthcare establishment and, in general, the more treatment the patient receives, the more that trust is strengthened.
To zaupanje temelji prvenstveno na ugledu strokovnjaka ali zdravstvene ustanove in se običajno z opravljanjem storitev za pacienta sproti povečuje.
That is why I take the view that access to the healthcare market in a Member State by a professional, whether a natural or a legal person, from another Member State is without doubt even more difficult than access to other activities such as banking or insurance, in which the risks are not as high and the relationship of trust between the service provider and the recipient does not have the same importance.
Zato menim, da je dostop strokovnjaka, fizične ali pravne osebe iz druge države članice, na zdravstveni trg v državi članici gotovo �e težji kot dostop do drugih dejavnosti, kot sta bančni�tvo ali zavarovalni�tvo, pri katerih je vseeno manj tveganja in kjer odnos zaupanja med ponudnikom in prejemnikom storitev nima enakega pomena.
The need for such a high level of quality in the healthcare sector is reflected, in particular, in the fact that the healthcare professions have traditionally been highly regulated in the various Member States.
Ta raven zahtevnosti na področju zdravstva se razlaga zlasti z dejstvom, da so zdravni�ki poklici v različnih državah članicah tradicionalno zelo urejeni.
Moreover, it was that extensive regulation which prompted the Community legislature to adopt in that field the first sectoral directives on recognition of the qualifications needed to exercise those professions and on harmonisation of the training required in order to obtain those qualifications. 55
Ta obsežna ureditev je normodajalca Skupnosti med drugim pripeljala do tega, da je na tem področju dejavnosti sprejel prve sektorske direktive glede priznanja diplom, potrebnih za opravljanje teh poklicev, in uskladitve izobraževanja, potrebnega za pridobitev teh diplom. 55
Consequently, I consider that a ban on all advertising to promote the provision of healthcare services is indeed liable to create a greater obstacle for professionals from other Member States than for those from the host Member State.
Zato se mi zdi, da prepoved slehernega ogla�evanja, ki spodbuja opravljanje takih zdravstvenih storitev, strokovnjake iz drugih držav članic postavlja v slab�i položaj kot tiste iz države članice gostiteljice.
A law of a Member State such as the Law of 1958 therefore constitutes, in my opinion, a restriction within the meaning of Article 43 EC.
Zakon države članice, kot je zakon iz leta 1958, po mojem mnenju torej pomeni omejitev v smislu člena 43 ES.
Healthcare is therefore a sector in which the free movement of professionals has
Zdravstvo torej pomeni področje, na katerem se prosto gibanje strokovnjakov
55 — The first sectoral scheme on the mutual recognition of qualifications was adopted in respect of doctors in 1975.
55 – Prva sektorska ureditev priznanja diplom zdravnikov je bila sprejeta leta 1975.
It was followed by five other sectoral schemes, adopted between 1977 and 1985, concerning nurses responsible for general care and dental practitioners, in the form of Directives 78/686 and 78/687, and veterinary surgeons, midwives and pharmacists.
Sledilo ji je pet drugih sektorskih ureditev, sprejetih med leti 1977 in 1985, ki se nana�ajo na zdravstvene tehnike, zobozdravnike, skupaj z direktivama 78/686 in 78/687, veterinarje, babice in farmacevte.
Those directives were repealed and replaced by Directive 2005/36.
Te direktive je razveljavila in nadomestila Direktiva 2005/36.
Such a measure may also be regarded as a restriction on the freedom to provide crossborder services.
Tak ukrep je mogoče obravnavati kot omejitev svobode opravljanja čezmejnih storitev.
OPINION OF MR BOT — CASE C-446/05
BOTA – ZADEVA C-446/05 ogla�evanja ponudnikov zobozdravstvenih storitev.
Article 49 EC, like Article 43 EC, requires the abolition of any restriction on the freedom to provide services, even if that restriction applies to national providers of services and to those of other Member States alike, when it is liable to prohibit or otherwise impede the activities of providers of services established in another Member State where they lawfully provide similar services.
Člen 49 ES tako kot člen 43 ES namreč zahteva odpravo kakr�ne koli omejitve svobode opravljanja storitev, tudi če se ta omejitev brez razlike uporablja za domače ponudnike in za tiste iz drugih držav članic, če je taka, da prepoveduje ali omejuje dejavnosti ponudnikov storitev, ki imajo sedež v drugi državi članici, kjer zakonito opravljajo enakovrstne storitve.
Moreover, the freedom to provide services is enjoyed by both providers and recipients of services.
Poleg tega svoboda opravljanja storitev koristi tako ponudnikom kot tudi naslovnikom storitev. 56
The ban on advertising of any kind in the dental care sector, as provided for by the Law of 1958, deprives providers of advertising services established in Member States other than Belgium of the possibility of offering their services to professionals established in that Member State.
Prepoved vsakr�nega ogla�evanja na področju zobozdravstva, kot je določena v zakonu iz leta 1958, ponudnikom ogla�evanja, ki imajo sedež v drugih državah članicah in ne v Belgiji, onemogoča ponujanje svojih storitev strokovnjakom s sedežem v tej državi članici.
It also prevents professionals such as Mr Doulamis from using the services of such providers.
Prav tako strokovnjakom, kot je I. Doulamis, preprečuje, da bi uporabljali storitve takih ponudnikov.
It is now appropriate to examine whether that restriction may be justified.
Sedaj je treba preučiti, ali je ta omejitev lahko upravičena.
Similarly, the Italian Government has made reference to the provisions of Directive 2001/83 which prohibit the advertising to the general public of medicinal products which are available on medical prescription only and which authorise the Member States to ban advertising of medicinal products the cost of which may be reimbursed.
V enakem smislu se italijanska vlada sklicuje na določbe Direktive 2001/83, ki prepovedujejo ogla�evanje zdravil, ki se prodajajo le na zdravni�ki recept, in ki državam članicam dovoljujejo, da prepovejo ogla�evanje zdravil, katerih plačilo se povrne.
It inferred from those provisions that the Member States were entitled to prohibit all advertising in those healthcare sectors in which that question had not been the subject of harmonisation measures.
Na podlagi teh določb je sklepala, da so države članice upravičene prepovedati sleherno ogla�evanje na zdravstvenih področjih, na katerih to vpra�anje ni bilo predmet usklajevanja.
(b) Whether the restriction may be justified
b) Upravičitev omejitve
The Belgian Government has set out the reasons for which the ban on advertising
Belgijska vlada je navedla razloge, ki so privedli do sprejetja prepovedi vsakr�nega
According to the Italian Government, information provided to the public in the healthcare sector must come from objective sources and advertising carried out by the service providers themselves would not fulfil that requirement of objectivity.
Po mnenju te vlade mora obve�čanje javnosti na zdravstvenem področju izhajati iz objektivnih virov, ogla�evanje s strani samih ponudnikov storitev pa naj tega pogoja objektivnosti ne bi izpolnjevalo.
58The protection of public health is also one of the overriding reasons relating to the general interest which are capable of justifying restrictions on the freedoms of movement guaranteed by the Treaty. 59
58 Varovanje javnega zdravja se prav tako nahaja med nujnimi razlogi javnega interesa, ki lahko upravičijo omejitve izvr�evanja pravic prostega pretoka, zagotovljenih s Pogodbo. 59
In the same way as the Belgian and Italian Governments, I am of the opinion that Member States are entitled to prohibit dental care providers from advertising their services to the general public where that prohibition is limited to the promotion of those services.
Tako kot belgijska in italijanska vlada menim, da so države članice upravičene ponudnikom zobozdravstvenih storitev prepovedati ogla�evanje svojih storitev, ker se ta prepoved dejansko omejuje na spodbujanje le-teh.