natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
e emphasis on Territorial Cohesion at intergovernmental level showed the debate was advanced enough to aim for a shared vision of how cohesion fits in to EU policies – after a year of formulation the Green Paper was published, to consolidate opinion and shape a way ahead.
•okrepitivezimedozemljiinnjihovopovezovanjesspodbujanjem sodelovanja in izmenjav ter
Simple stereotypes such as ‘urban equals productivity – rural equals disadvantage’ need to be cleared away as does the idea that certain types of topography are inextricable linked to low GDP.
Treba je pomesti s preprostimi stereotipi, kot so „mesta pomenijo produktivnost – podeželje pomeni prikrajšanost“, pa tudi s predstavo, da so nekatere topografije neločljivo povezane z nizkim BDP.
Some cities are struggling, some rural areas booming and territorial cooperation should focus on bringing the two together to provide the opportunity for the regions to improve the lives of the people living within them across the board.
Nekatera mesta so v težavah, nekatera podeželska območja cvetijo, teritorialno sodelovanje pa bi se moralo osredotočiti na to, da jih združi in regijam omogoči, da se ljudem, ki tam živijo, na splošno izboljša življenje.
Funds should be channelled into kick starting synergies which are self-perpetuating, feeding back into the region after the project or programme is over. e focus should be shifted from shoring up to seeding the potential for growth – co-operating to compete.
Sredstva je treba usmeriti v zagonske sinergije, ki se lahko obnavljajo same in se po koncu projekta ali programa vrnejo v regijo.
Until now, the traditional cornerstone of cohesion funding, and the unit of analysis upon which policy was based, has been the Member State’s medium-sized NUTS 2 administrative regions, identified by Eurostat as sharing a common set of parameters.
Pozornost je treba preusmeriti s podpiranja k spodbujanju možnosti za rast – sodelovanju za konkurenčnost.
e Commission welcomes your feedback during this process of debate which will run until the end of February, 2009.
Komisija se veseli vaših povratnih informacij, ki jih bo prejela v tem postopku razprave, ki bo trajal do konca februarja 2009.
See the Green Paper website: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/index_en.htm
Obiščite spletno stran o zeleni knjigi: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/consultation/terco/index_sl.htm
e argument that we need a territorial counterpoint to large, EU-wide, sectoral policies, is gaining momentum, as is the fact that policy needs to be adapted at local level to work well. is is starting to filter through with certain regional programmes passing global budgets directly to the cities involved, giving them a say in the design and implementation
Doslej so se kot tradicionalni temelj kohezijskega financiranja in analitične enote, na katerih je temeljila politika, uporabljale srednje velike regije držav članic, t. i. upravne regije na ravni 2 NUTS, ki jih je Eurostat opredelil kot regije s skupnim nizom parametrov.
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_ p. 7 _BAR_
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_ str. 7 _BAR_
The following selection of interviews highlights how the Green Paper is perceived by a cross section of people involved in regional policy.
V izbranih intervjujih je osvetljeno, kako zeleno knjigo dojemajo različni ljudje, vključeni v regionalno politiko.
Their priorities and positions are interwoven with their occupations and to show their dierent perspectives, each interviewee was asked two key questions which remain the same in each case.
Njihove prednostne naloge in stališča so povezani s poklici, ki jih opravljajo. Vsi izprašani so odgovarjali na dve enaki ključni vprašanji, da bi predstavili svoja različna gledišča.
The third is of their own making, providing a window on their key preoccupations, varying according to their role.
Tretje vprašanje so si izbrali sami, da glede na svojo vlogo osvetlijo glavne zadeve, s katerimi se ukvarjajo.
Danuta Hübner, European Commissioner for Regional Policy
Danuta Hübner, evropska komisarka za regionalno politiko
How do you envisage the recent Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion changing things on the ground?
Kako bo po vašem mnenju nova zelena knjiga o teritorialni koheziji spremenila dejansko stanje?
Progress is needed to coordinate sectoral and territorial policies, even if the different policies remain autonomous. ere is also a need for further partnership to reinforce the difficult, but essential combination of high-level, European direction and the bottom-up definition of local needs and preferences.
Potreben je napredek pri usklajevanju sektorskih in teritorialnih politik, čeprav bodo različne politike ostale avtonomne. Treba si je tudi prizadevati za nadaljnje partnerstvo pri krepitvi težavnega, a bistvenega združevanja evropskega usmerjanja na visoki ravni z opredeljevanjem lokalnih potreb in želja od spodaj navzgor.
e Green Paper asks us to consider the impact that policies, like transport or agriculture, have on the ground.
Zelena knjiga nam nalaga, naj upoštevamo vpliv politik, kot sta prometna ali kmetijska, na dejansko stanje.
It asks how the harmonious development of different territories can be achieved through different public policies, and in particular through European Cohesion Policy.
Sprašuje, kako doseči usklajen razvoj različnih ozemelj z izvajanjem različnih javnih politik, zlasti pa z evropsko kohezijsko politiko.
A clearer knowledge of our territories, including territorial dynamics, impacts, scenarios, and so on, is needed for better decision making.
Za boljše odločanje je potrebno boljše poznavanje naših ozemelj, vključno s teritorialno dinamiko, vplivi, scenariji itd.
Data and indicators, as well as methods, must be able to detect the complex nature of the impact policies can have on the ground. ere are significant ongoing efforts in this respect, for instance within the ESPON programme.
Podatki, kazalniki in metode morajo biti taki, da lahko zaznajo zapletenost vplivov, ki jih imajo politike lahko na dejansko stanje. Na tem področju potekajo nenehna prizadevanja, na primer znotraj programa ESPON.
Cooperation seems to be a key theme in the Green Paper − what issues do you feel may need to be overcome in order to bring about real interregional and transnational regional co-operation?
Zdi se, da je ključna tema zelene knjige sodelovanje – katera vprašanja bi bilo treba po vašem mnenju razrešiti, da bi dosegli dejansko medregionalno in transnacionalno regionalno sodelovanje?
e preamble of the Lisbon Treaty points out that the prime objective of the European Union is to ‘create an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe’ and to ‘ensure the economic and social progress of their countries by common action to eliminate the barriers which divide Europe’.
V preambuli Lizbonske pogodbe je poudarjeno, da je najpomembnejši cilj Evropske unije „graditi vse tesnejšo zvezo med narodi Evrope“ in „ s skupnim delovanjem odstraniti pregrade, ki razdvajajo Evropo, in tako zagotoviti svojim državam gospodarski in socialni napredek“.
To ensure this we need to focus on co-operation, and no matter how well we implement the internal market, barriers do still remain.
Politika mora biti povezovalna na vseh ravneh in zadovoljevati potrebe ljudi, ki živijo na primerno opredeljenih ozemljih.
Policy needs to be integrated at all levels, addressing the needs of people living in appropriately defined territories.
Da bi dosegli ta cilj, se moramo osredotočiti na sodelovanje, saj ovire ostajajo, ne glede na to, kako dobro uresničujemo notranji trg.
I hope the Green Paper will trigger a far-reaching discussion, identifying the challenges common to certain types of regions and which will be better addressed through co-operation.
Namen kohezijske politike je zagotoviti, da lahko ljudje čim bolj izkoristijo dane značilnosti ozemelj, na katerih živijo, zelena knjiga pa začenja razpravo o tem, kako to doseči.
Cooperation and sharing experience between regions can be a key trigger in stimulating a dynamic, forward-looking regional development process.
V tem posvetovalnem obdobju smo prisluhnili ljudem in zbiramo njihove pripombe, vendar menim, da je treba upoštevati nekaj konkretnih vidikov.
Cohesion Policy is about ensuring people are able to make the most of the inherent features of the territories in which they live and the Green Paper opens up the debate on how to ensure this.
Upam, da bo zelena knjiga sprožila daljnosežno razpravo, v kateri bomo odkrili izzive, ki so skupni nekaterim vrstam regij in jih bo lažje reševati s sodelovanjem.
We are listening to what people are saying in this consultation period and are taking stock of their comments, but, in my view, there are concrete aspects to consider.
Sodelovanje in izmenjava izkušenj med regijami sta lahko ključna za spodbujanje dinamičnega procesa regionalnega razvoja, usmerjenega v prihodnost.
Multilevel governance can give shape to sustainable cooperation within large, transnational areas such as mountain ranges, crossborder agglomerations and common territories at a more local scale.
Z upravljanjem na več ravneh se lahko izoblikuje trajnostno sodelovanje znotraj velikih transnacionalnih območij, kot so gorske verige, čezmejna strnjena naselja in skupna ozemlja na bolj lokalni ravni.
Here, the European Grouping for Territorial Co-operation, which can involve all public levels, appears to be an emblematic EU tool.
Pri tem se zdijo evropska združenja za teritorialno sodelovanje, ki lahko vključujejo vse javne ravni, simbolično orodje EU.
We need to rethink how we define ‘territory’ and make policy.
Znova moramo razmisliti, kako opredeljujemo „ozemlje“ in oblikujemo politiko.
Increasingly people are not confining themselves to established administrative borders – commuting to work and covering greater distances to shop or for leisure – so how they live within territories is changing.
Ljudje se vedno manj zadržujejo znotraj določenih upravnih mej – prevažajo se na delo ter nakupujejo in preživljajo prosti čas v oddaljenejših krajih – torej se spreminja njihov način življenja znotraj ozemelj.
At the same time, new challenges such as globalisation, climate change and migration require common European action which brings together all levels of policy making.
Hkrati so zaradi novih izzivov, kot so globalizacija, podnebne spremembe in migracija, potrebni enotni evropski ukrepi, ki bi združili vse ravni oblikovanja politike.
Is the debate on Territorial Cohesion premature, given that the Lisbon Treaty in which it is enshrined has not yet been signed?
Ali je razprava o teritorialni koheziji prenagljena, glede na to, da Lizbonska pogodba, v kateri je zapisana, še ni podpisana?
e debate is not premature – it is important to realise the concept of Territorial Cohesion is not new.
Razprava ni prenagljena – pomembno je razumeti, da koncept teritorialne kohezije ni nov.
In this context, the European Parliament, the informal meeting of Ministers
V zvezi s tem so Evropski parlament, pristojni ministri za razvoj mest in teritorialno
We need to have an integrated approach to policy making at all levels; public policies need to meet people’s needs in territories that are appropriately defined. ese territories could vary from local communities to metropolitan areas, from crossborder regions to transnational maritime or river basins.
Potrebujemo celostni pristop k oblikovanju politike na vseh ravneh; javne politike morajo zadovoljiti potrebe ljudi na ozemljih, ki so ustrezno opredeljena. Ta ozemlja so lahko različna – od lokalnih skupnosti do velemestnih območij, od čezmejnih regij do mednarodnih morskih bazenov ali porečij.
8 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_
8 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_
Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, the way ahead responsible for urban development and Territorial Cohesion in Leipzig in 2007, as well as many associations representing specific types of territories, asked the Commission to present a paper on Territorial Cohesion. e Green Paper is our answer.
Zelena knjiga o teritorialni koheziji, pot naprej kohezijo na neformalnem srečanju v Leipzigu leta 2007 ter številna združenja, ki predstavljajo posebne vrste ozemelj, zaprosili Komisijo, naj pripravi knjigo o teritorialni koheziji. Zelena knjiga je naš odgovor.
By launching the debate, the Commission hopes to reach a common understanding of Territorial Cohesion, and common European solutions.
Komisija upa, da bo s sprožitvijo razprave dosegla skupno razumevanje teritorialne kohezije in enotne evropske rešitve.
But we have to take the policy process into account. e Lisbon Treaty will make the Territorial Cohesion objective visible and explicit; but first it has to be ratified.
Vendar moramo upoštevati postopek oblikovanja politike. Z Lizbonsko pogodbo bo cilj teritorialne kohezije postal jasen in opredeljen, vendar je treba to pogodbo najprej ratificirati.
Future Cohesion Policy shall deepen the territorial dimension of development; but at present we are working hard on making the implementation of the 2007−13 programmes a success.
S prihodnjo kohezijsko politiko se bo poglobila teritorialna razsežnost razvoja; trenutno pa si zelo prizadevamo za uspešno uresničitev programa 2007–2013.
We have to think of the future, but many things can be done within the present treaties and regulations.
Misliti moramo na prihodnost, a veliko lahko dosežemo z že veljavnimi pogodbami in predpisi.
e territorial dimension has been at the core of Cohesion Policy since its inception, through the system of eligibility, the system of distribution of financial resources and the way in which the programming has been organised.
Teritorialna razsežnost je že od vsega začetka bistvo kohezijske politike prek sistema upravičenosti, sistema razdeljevanja finančnih sredstev in načina organiziranosti načrtovanja programov.
But many feel the need to improve the way public policies address territorial needs, even if at present there is no firm agreement about the way to do so.
Vendar pa številni menijo, da je treba izboljšati zadovoljevanje teritorialnih potreb z javnimi politikami, čeprav trenutno ni trdnega soglasja o tem, kako to storiti.
Michel Delebarre, First Vice-President of the Committee of the Regions since 2008, Mayor of Dunkerque
Michel Delebarre, prvi podpredsednik Odbora regij od leta 2008, župan Dunkerqua
European regulation. We need to say, loud and clear, that in the eyes of those elected, those working in the institutions and those involved in the economic and social aspects of the territories, it is inconceivable that the current objective of cooperation be reconsidered, post-2013.
izvoljeni, delajo v ustanovah in so vključeni v gospodarske in družbene vidike ozemelj, nepredstavljivo, da bi se sedanji cilj sodelovanja znova pretehtal po letu 2013. Izboljšave, da. Reforme, da.
But the exchange of best practice can not be done for free and no restrictions should be placed on territorial co-operation.
Ampak najboljše prakse si ni mogoče izmenjavati zastonj, poleg tega pa za ozemeljsko sodelovanje ne sme biti nikakršnih omejitev.
What role should public services play in Territorial Cohesion?
Kakšno vlogo bi morale imeti javne službe pri teritorialni koheziji?
So what do we mean by Territorial Cohesion?
Menim, da morajo imeti vsa ozemlja upanje za prihodnost in možnost, da izoblikujejo strategije, kakršne si želijo.
My analysis is that each territory must have hope for the future, must be able to construct a strategy after its own fashion. at doesn’t mean that all the territories are the same, will have the same number of SMEs or the same degree of infrastructure.
To ne pomeni, da so vsa ozemlja enaka, bodo imela enako število malih in srednjih velikih podjetij ali enako raven infrastrukture.
All regions come across internal problems related to Territorial Cohesion and competitivity.
Vse regije se spopadajo z notranjimi težavami, povezanimi s teritorialno kohezijo in konkurenčnostjo.
As far as we are concerned, it is necessary to let all the regions play their part in the ‘European concert’ both despite and because of their diversity.
Menimo, da je treba vsem regijam omogočiti, da odigrajo svojo vlogo v „evropski družini“ kljub svoji raznolikosti in prav zaradi nje.
No territory should be abandoned, left behind in the development of the EU.
Pri razvoju EU ne smemo pozabiti na nobeno ozemlje ali pustiti, da zaostaja za drugimi.
We need to bring forward a voluntary policy of cohesion to get to Territorial Cohesion.
Prepričan sem, da tega besedila ne bi mogli uporabiti, če bi ga predložili v predhodno preučitev ob upoštevanju potreb politike teritorialne kohezije, ker jim ne ustreza. Javne službe so razsežnost, ki jo je treba prilagoditi pojmu teritorialna kohezija.
It isn’t possible to consider Cohesion Policy or Territorial Cohesion as the fix all for all these other policies.
To bi Evropo lahko spodbudilo k reviziji številnih zadev, povezanih z javnimi službami.
So it is an important point to think about for the future for the EU.
Želel bi si, da bi zelena knjiga to precej bolj poudarila.
For example, consider the directive on the postal services.
Podpreti moramo prostovoljno kohezijsko politiko, da bi dosegli teritorialno kohezijo.
I am sure that if we had submitted the text to an examination beforehand, with regards to the needs of Territorial Cohesion Policy, we wouldn’t have been able to use the same text because it doesn’t respond to the needs of Territorial Cohesion.
To ne sme biti politika, ki bo spravila v red vse politike EU, ki se po lastni volji niso spremenile ne glede na ozemlje, na primer politike na področju raziskav ali kmetijske politike.
Public services are a dimension that needs to be reapplied to the notion of Territorial Cohesion. is could prompt Europe to review a number of things in relation to public services.
Kohezijske politike ali teritorialne kohezije ne smemo obravnavati kot nekaj, kar bo spravilo v red vse te druge politike.
I would have liked the Green Paper to put a much stronger emphasis on this.
Zato je pomembno, da se to upošteva pri razmisleku o prihodnosti EU.
Cooperation seems to be a key theme in the Green Paper − what issues do you feel may need to be overcome in order to bring about real crossborder and transnational regional co-operation?
Zdi se, da je ključna tema zelene knjige sodelovanje – katera vprašanja bi bilo treba po vašem mnenju razrešiti, da bi dosegli dejansko čezmejno in transnacionalno regionalno sodelovanje?
Nobody contests the added value brought to Europe through territorial co-operation.
Nihče ne ugovarja dodani vrednosti, ki jo Evropi prinaša teritorialno sodelovanje. Treba ga je okrepiti kot ključno orodje teritorialne kohezije.
When we look, concretely, at frontiers we find ourselves in territories which, without doubt, provide the biggest opportunities for the future building of Europe.
Če pogledamo konkretno, so ob mejah ozemlja, ki nedvomno ponujajo največje priložnosti za prihodnji razvoj Evrope. Tam vplivamo na vsakdanje življenje ljudi.
It is there that we affect people’s everyday lives. ere are obstacles in the domain of social security and in the area of transport, but I believe we will be able to surmount all these. e EU must continue to consider this process as a laboratory for the construction of a European Union that has a daily presence.
Tam so ovire na področju socialne varnosti in prometa, vendar verjamem, da jih bomo lahko premagali. EU mora ta proces še naprej obravnavati kot laboratorij za izgradnjo Evropske unije, prisotne v vsakdanjem življenju.
I think that is very important.
Mislim, da je to zelo pomembno.
Everyone wishes to see best practice being implemented but this is not possible without some funding and some e European concert: each region’s diversity is Europe’s overall strength.
Vsi si želimo, da bi se uresničevala najboljša praksa, vendar to ni mogoče brez nekaj financiranja in evropskih predpisov. Jasno in glasno moramo povedati, da je za ljudi, ki so bili
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_ p. 9 _BAR_
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_ str. 9 _BAR_
Andreas Faludi, Professor of Spatial Policy Systems in Europe at the OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies, University of Delft, Honorary Member of the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI, UK) and the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP).
Andreas Faludi, profesor sistemov prostorskega načrtovanja v Evropi na Raziskovalnem inštitutu OTB za stanovanjske študije, urbanizem in mobilnost Univerze v Delftu, častni član Kraljevega inštituta za načrtovanje mest (Royal Town Planning Institute, RTPI, Združeno kraljestvo) in Zveze evropskih visokih šol za prostorsko načrtovanje (AESOP)
Much progress has been made in facilitating exchanges, but the existing setup is still very strong.
Veliko je bilo doseženega pri spodbujanju izmenjav, vendar je ta struktura še vedno zelo trdna.
So accountability takes place in terms of ‘my community’, ‘my region’, ‘my nation’, ‘my voters’, as does political legitimacy − which is perhaps the biggest challenge to interregional and transnational co-operation.
Zato se odgovornost izraža v smislu „moje skupnosti“, „moje regije“, „mojega naroda“, „mojih volivcev“, enako pa velja tudi za politično legitimnost – kar je morda največji izziv za medregionalno in transnacionalno sodelovanje.
Why is it so difficult to define Territorial Cohesion − the first question for debate that the Green Paper poses, and one often raised in discussions?
Zakaj je tako težko opredeliti teritorialno kohezijo – prvo vprašanje za razpravo, ki ga zastavlja zelena knjiga in je pogosto zastavljeno na razpravah?
Being a discussion document, the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion as such does not pretend to ‘change things on the ground’, but one may of course ask what the effects might be of the discussion which it will generate.
Ker je zelena knjiga o teritorialni koheziji dokument za razpravo, se ne pretvarja, da je namenjena „spreminjanju dejanskega stanja“, se pa seveda lahko vprašamo, kakšni bi lahko bili učinki razprave, ki jo bo spodbudila.
In these terms, I envisage more attention being paid to where people live, where firms are located, where local communities or regions are in relation to their partners, their competitors, their markets, etc.
Tako predvidevam, da bo več pozornosti namenjene temu, kje ljudje živijo, kje imajo podjetja sedeže, kje so lokalne skupnosti ali regije glede na svoje partnerje, konkurenco, trge itd.
In other words, as the Community Strategic Guidelines rightly claim, ‘geography matters’, and I hope that as a result of the Green Paper, public and private actors will combine forces to better understand geography and how to take their geographic positions into account.
Povedano drugače, več pozornosti bo namenjene „geografskim zadevam“, kot je ustrezno navedeno v strateških smernicah Skupnosti, in upam, da bodo zaradi zelene knjige javni in zasebni subjekti združili moči za boljše razumevanje geografije in tega, kako upoštevati svoje geografske položaje.
On this basis, they may also understand each other better and improve their individual and joint policies.
Na osnovi tega lahko izboljšajo tudi medsebojno razumevanje ter svoje posamezne in skupne politike.
As with economic and social cohesion which equally elude simple definitions, Territorial Cohesion is an umbrella concept.
Tako kot ekonomska in socialna kohezija, ki se enako izmikata preprosti opredelitvi, je tudi teritorialna kohezija krovni koncept.