natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This burner must be switched on automatically when the temperature of the combustion gases after the last injection of combustion air falls below 850°C or 1 100°C as the case may be.
Ta gorilnik se mora samodejno vklopiti, kadar po zadnjem dovodu zraka za sežig temperatura zgorevalnih plinov pade pod 850 °C oziroma 1100 °C.
It shall also be used during plant start-up and shut-down operations in order to ensure that the temperature of 850°C or 1 100°C as the case may be is maintained at all times during these operations and as long as unburned waste is in the combustion chamber.
Gorilnik se uporabi tudi ob zagonu in ustavitvi naprave, da se zagotovi, da se temperatura 850 °C oziroma 1 100 °C vzdržuje ves čas teh postopkov in dokler so nesežgani odpadki v sežigalni komori.
During start-up and shut-down or when the temperature of the combustion gas falls below 850°C or 1 100°C as the case may be, the auxiliary burner shall not be fed with fuels which can cause higher emissions than those resulting from the burning of gasoil as defined in Article 1(1) of Council Directive 75/716/EEC [of 24 November
Med zagonom in ustavitvijo ali ko temperatura zgorevalnega plina pade pod 850 °C ali 1 100 °C, se pomožni gorilnik ne sme polniti z gorivi, ki lahko povzročijo vi�je emisije od tistih, nastalih pri sežigu plinskega olja, kot je opredeljeno v členu 1(1) Direktive Sveta 75/716/EGS [z dne 24. novembra 1975 o približevanju zakonodaj
2008 — CASE C-251/07
2008 – ZADEVA C-251/07 držav članic o deležu žvepla v nekaterih tekočih gorivih (UL L 307, str.
22)], liquefied gas or natural gas.
22)], utekočinjenega plina ali zemeljskega plina.
Co-incineration plants shall be designed, equipped, built and operated in such a way that the gas resulting from the co-incineration of waste is raised in a controlled and homogeneous fashion and even under the most unfavourable conditions, to a temperature of 850°C for two seconds.
Naprave za sosežig se projektirajo, opremijo, zgradijo in upravljajo tako, da se plin, ki nastane pri sosežiganju odpadkov, na nadzorovan in homogen način ter tudi v najbolj neugodnih pogojih za dve sekundi segreje na 850 °C.
If hazardous wastes with a content of more than 1% of halogenated organic substances, expressed as chlorine, are co-inciner-ated, the temperature has to be raised to 1 100°C.
Če se sosežigajo nevarni odpadki, ki vsebujejo več kot 1 % halogeniranih organskih snovi, izraženih kot klor, je treba temperaturo dvigniti na 1 100 °C.
Incineration and co-incineration plants shall have and operate an automatic system to prevent waste feed:
Sežigalnice in naprave za sosežig imajo in uporabljajo samodejni sistem za preprečevanje doziranja odpadkov:
(a) at start-up, until the temperature of 850°C or 1 100°C as the case may be or the temperature specified according to paragraph 4 has been reached;
(a) ob zagonu, dokler se ne doseže temperatura 850 °C ali 1 100 °C ali temperatura, določena v skladu z odstavkom 4;
(b) whenever the temperature of 850°C or 1 100°C as the case may be or the tem -perature specified according to paragraph 4 is not maintained;
(b) kadar se temperatura 850 °C ali 1 100 °C ali temperatura, določena v skladu z odstavkom 4, ne vzdržuje;
(c) whenever the continuous measurements required by this Directive show that any emissions limit value is exceeded due to disturbances or failures of the purification devices.
(c) kadar neprekinjene meritve, predpisane v tej direktivi, kažejo, da je zaradi motenj ali okvar čistilnih naprav presežena katera koli mejna vrednost emisij.
Any heat generated by the incineration or the co-incineration process shall be recovered as far as practicable.’
Vsa toplota, pridobljena pri sežiganju ali sosežiganju, se uporabi, kolikor je le izvedljivo.“
Article 7 of Directive 2000/76, in conjunction with Annexes II and V thereto, set the emissions limit values for incineration plants and for co-incineration plants.
V členu 7 Direktive 2000/76 v povezavi z njenima prilogama II in V so določene mejne vrednosti emisij za sežigalnice in naprave za sosežig.
Under the second subparagraph of Article 7(2), the emissions limit values which apply to incineration plants also apply to co-incineration plants in which more than 40% of the resulting heat release comes from hazardous waste.
Na podlagi odstavka 2, drugi pododstavek, navedenega člena se mejne vrednosti emisij, ki veljajo za sežigalnice, uporabijo tudi za naprave za sosežig, v katerih več kot 40 % toplote nastane iz nevarnih odpadkov.
Gävle Kraftvärme is an undertaking within the Gävle Energi group of companies, which, in turn, is wholly owned by an undertaking owned by the municipality of Gävle.
Gävle Kraftvärme je družba iz skupine Gävle Energi, ki je v lasti delni�ke družbe, katere lastnik je občina Gävle.
Gävle Kraftvärme operates the Johannes co-generation plant, which is the basic production plant for Gävle’s district heating network, producing heat and electricity.
Upravlja toplarno Johannes, ki je osnovni obrat v omrežju daljinskega ogrevanja občine Gävle in ki proizvaja toploto in elektriko.
Having decided to extend that plant, Gävle Kraftvärme applied to Östersunds tingsrätt, miljödomstolen (Östersund District Court, Environmental Court) for a permit to operate at a total installed supplied capacity of a maximum of 170 MW in that plant.
Ker je družba Gävle Kraftvärme načrtovala raz�iritev te toplarne, je pri Östersunds tingsrätt, miljödomstolen (sodi�če prve stopnje Östersund, pristojno na področju okolja) vložila pro�njo za izdajo dovoljenja za obratovanje navedene toplarne z največjo skupno toplotno močjo 170 MW.
That application related in particular to the following points:
Ta pro�nja se je nana�ala predvsem na te točke:
— a permit to continue operating the existing solid fuel furnace (Furnace No 1) with a total installed thermal capacity of 85 MW;
– dovoljenje za nadaljnjo uporabo zdaj�njega kotla na trda goriva (kotel �t. 1) s skupno toplotno močjo 85 MW;
— installation and putting into operation of a new waste furnace (Furnace No 2) with a total installed thermal capacity of a maximum of 50 MW; and
– namestitev in zagon novega kotla na goriva iz odpadkov z največjo skupno toplotno močjo 50 MW (kotel �t. 2) in
— installation and putting into operation of a new biofuel furnace with a total installed supplied capacity of a maximum of 85 MW (Furnace 3).
– namestitev in zagon novega kotla na biolo�ka goriva z največjo skupno toplotno močjo 85 MW (kotel �t. 3).
The application was also for a permit to carry out additional changes necessary for the increased operations.
Navedena pro�nja se je nana�ala tudi na druge spremembe, potrebne zaradi načrtovane raz�iritve dejavnosti.
At the time the application was made, the precise manner in which the plant would be extended had not yet been finally determined.
Ob vložitvi te pro�nje podrobnosti raz�iritve �e niso bile dokončno določene. Družba Gävle Kraftvärme naj bi zgradila kotel �t. 2, kotel �t.
In any event, the combined power was not to exceed 85 MW.
V vsakem primeru skupna moč ne bi smela presegati 85 MW.
In its application for a permit, Gävle Kraftvärme had confirmed that both Furnace No 1 and Furnace No 2 could be classified as ‘co-incineration plants’.
Družba Gävle Kraftvärme je v svoji pro�nji za izdajo dovoljenja zagotovila, da se lahko kotel �t. 1 in kotel �t.
The regional authority, which stated that it favoured the application, nevertheless took the view that the activity in question corresponded more closely to that of a waste incineration plant.
2 opredelita kot „napravi za sosežig“. Prefektura, ki je ugodila pro�nji, je vendarle menila, da obravnavana dejavnost ustreza bolj sežigalnici odpadkov.
The court of first instance confirmed the classification proposed by Gävle Kraftvärme, taking the view that the essential purpose of the plant was the prod -uction of energy.
Sodi�če prve stopnje je potrdilo opredelitev, ki jo je predlagala družba Gävle Kraftvärme, ker je menilo, da je glavni namen naprave proizvodnja energije.
Gävle Kraftvärme brought an appeal against the latter decision to the Högsta domstolen (Supreme Court), submitting that the court of appeal erred in classifying the furnaces separately.
Družba Gävle Kraftvärme je vložila pravno sredstvo zoper slednjo odločbo pri Högsta domstolen (vrhovno sodi�če) in trdila, da je pritožbeno sodi�če napačno opredelilo kotla kot različni napravi.
The referring court notes that the classification of a plant is important, since the requirements for its operation differ according to the type of installation in question.
Predložitveno sodi�če poudarja, da je opredelitev naprave pomembna, ker se zahteve za obratovanje razlikujejo glede na vrsto obravnavanih naprav.
Consequently, taking the view that the resolution of the dispute depends on the interpretation of Community law, it decided to stay the proceedings and refer the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
Ker meni, da je re�itev spora o glavni stvari odvisna od razlage prava Skupnosti, je prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo ti vpra�anji:
The concepts of ‘incineration plant’ and ‘co-incineration’ plant are defined in Article 3(4) and (5) of Directive 2000/76.
Pojma „sežigalnica“ in „naprava za sosežig“ sta opredeljena v členu 3, točki 4 in 5, Direktive 2000/76.
Under Article 3(4), a plant is defined as ‘any… technical unit or equipment’.
V okviru navedenega člena 3, točka 4, je naprava opredeljena „kot kater[a] koli […] tehničn[a] enot[a] in oprem[a]“.
The term ‘plant’ is not expressly defined within the definition of ‘co-incineration plant’ in Article 3(5) of Directive 2000/76, but it is clear that that provision refers by implication to the preceding paragraph of that article.
Pojem „naprava“ ni pojasnjen v okviru opredelitve pojma „naprava za sosežig“ iz člena 3, točka 5, Direktive 2000/76, ampak je očitno, da ta določba implicitno napotuje na prej�njo točko istega člena.
It is apparent from the wording of Article 3(5) that the definition of ‘co-incineration plant’ is based on the concept of ‘incineration plant’ in Article 3(4) and that those provisions do not differ with regard to all the technical elements which must be taken into account for the classification of an incineration unit.
Iz besedila navedene točke 5 namreč izhaja, da opredelitev „naprave za sosežig“ izhaja iz pojma „sežigalnica“ iz navedenega člena 3, točka 4, in da se ti določbi ne razlikujeta glede tehničnih delov, ki jih je treba upo�tevati pri opredelitvi enote za sežiganje.
The technical elements which constitute an incineration plant and a co-incineration plant are listed in the second subparagraph of Article 3(4) and the third subparagraph of Article 3(5) of Directive 2000/76.
Tehnični deli, ki sestavljajo sežigalnico in napravo za sosežig, so na�teti v členu 3, točki 4, drugi odstavek, in 5, tretji odstavek, Direktive 2000/76.
Included in those elements is the ‘boiler’.
Med temi deli je „kotel“.
As the Advocate General observed in point 20 of her Opinion, in contrast to other elements listed which appear in the plural, the term ‘boiler’ (and also the term ‘stack’) is referred to in the singular.
Kot je generalna pravobranilka poudarila v točki 20 sklepnih predlogov, je pojem „kotel“ (in �e pojem „odvodnik“) naveden v ednini, v nasprotju z drugimi na�tetimi deli, ki so navedeni v množini.
The wording of Article 3(4) and (5) of Directive 2000/76 therefore strongly supports the interpretation that each individual boiler, together with its associated equipment, constitutes a separate plant for the purposes of that directive.
Besedilo člena 3, točki 4 in 5, Direktive 2000/76 govori v prid razlagi, v skladu s katero je vsak posamezen kotel skupaj s pripadajočo opremo ločena naprava v smislu te direktive.
That interpretation is supported by the scheme and purpose of Directive 2000/76.
Ta razlaga temelji tudi na strukturi in namenu Direktive 2000/76.
With regard, firstly, to its scheme, it is established that incineration plants and co-incineration plants are subject to different rules as regards the operating conditions and emissions limit values which apply to them.
V zvezi z njeno strukturo ni sporno, da se za sežigalnice in naprave za sosežig uporab -ljajo različna pravila glede pogojev obratovanja in mejnih vrednosti emisij, ki za njih veljajo.
In general, co-incineration plants are subject to less restrictive rules.
Na splo�no so pravila za naprave za sosežig manj stroga.
As regards operating conditions in particular, those applicable to incineration plants include requirements relating to the slag and bottom ashes total organic carbon content and their loss on ignition which are not laid down for co-incineration plants.
V zvezi s pogoji obratovanja vsebujejo tisti, ki veljajo za sežigalnice, zahteve v zvezi z deležem skupnega organskega ogljika v žlindri in pepelu ter žarilno izgubo, ki niso določene za naprave za sosežig.
Moreover, although for both types of plant those conditions include certain requirements regarding the temperature of the combustion gases when waste is added, only incineration plants must be equipped with at least one auxiliary burner.
Poleg tega, če zajemajo navedeni pogoji za obe vrsti naprav določene zahteve v zvezi s temperaturo zgorevalnega plina med oskrbo z odpadki, morajo imeti samo sežigalnice vsaj en pomožni gorilnik.
As the Advocate General observed in point 21 of her Opinion, certain provisions relating to incineration plants can be applied only to individual boilers.
Kot je poudarila generalna pravobranilka v točki 21 sklepnih predlogov, je mogoče nekatere določbe o sežigalnicah uporabiti le za posamezne kotle.
It follows that an interpretation by which, in a co-generation plant, each boiler is to be considered a separate plant accords with the scheme of Directive 2000/76.
Iz tega izhaja, da je razlaga, v skladu s katero se mora v toplarni vsak kotel obravnavati kot posamezna naprava, v skladu s strukturo Direktive 2000/76.
Such a conclusion is, furthermore, supported by the rules governing the issue of an operating permit for an incineration plant or a co-incineration plant.
Tak sklep podpirajo tudi pravila o pridobitvi dovoljenja za obratovanje sežigalnice ali naprave za sosežig.
Article 3(12) of Directive 2000/76 expressly provides that a permit may cover one or more plants or parts of a plant on the same site operated by the same operator.
V členu 3, točka 12, Direktive 2000/76 je namreč izrecno predviden primer, v katerem se izda dovoljenje za več posameznih naprav na istem kraju, ki jih upravlja isti upravljavec.
With regard, secondly, to the purpose of Directive 2000/76, it is apparent from Article 1 thereof that it seeks to prevent or to limit as far as practicable negative effects on the environment of incineration or co-incineration of waste by means of stringent operational conditions and technical requirements and through setting emissions limit values.
V zvezi z namenom Direktive 2000/76 izhaja iz njenega člena 1, da je njen cilj pri sežiganju in sosežiganju odpadkov preprečiti ali omejiti negativne učinke na okolje, kar se doseže s strogimi pogoji obratovanja in tehničnimi zahtevami ter z določitvijo mejnih vrednosti emisij.
As was stated by the Austrian Government and the Commission of the European Communities in their observations, an interpretation of Directive 2000/76 which excludes the separate classification of each boiler is likely to hinder achievement of that objective.
Kot sta avstrijska vlada in Komisija Evropskih skupnosti poudarili v svojih pisnih stali�čih, razlaga Direktive 2000/76, ki bi izključevala ločeno opredelitev vsakega kotla, ne bi bila v skladu s tem namenom.
Thus, if a co-generation plant comprising incineration and co-incin-eration units were to be classified, in its entirety, as a ‘co-incineration plant’, such a power station would be in a position to avoid the stricter obligations which apply to an incineration plant.
Če bi se toplarna z več enotami za sežig in sosežig opredelila kot celota kot „naprava za sosežig“, bi se tak�na toplarna lahko izognila zahtevnej�im obveznostim, ki veljajo za sežigalnico.
Having regard to the foregoing, the answer to the first question must be that, for the purposes of applying Directive 2000/76, where a co-generation plant comprises a number of boilers, each boiler and its associated equipment is to be regarded as constituting a separate plant.
Glede na navedeno je treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je treba pri uporabi Direktive 2000/76, ko ima toplarna več kotlov, vsak kotel ter pripadajočo opremo obravnavati kot ločeno napravo.
Under the first subparagraph of Article 3(4) of Directive 2000/76, a plant dedicated to the thermal treatment of waste constitutes an incineration plant.
Na podlagi člena 3, točka 4, prvi odstavek, Direktive 2000/76 je naprava, namenjena toplotni obdelavi odpadkov, sežigalnica.
In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 3(5), a plant whose main purpose is the generation of energy or production of material products and which either uses
V skladu s točko 5, prvi odstavek, istega člena se naprava, katere glavni namen je proizvodnja energije ali izdelkov in ki uporablja odpadke kot običajno ali dodatno
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME waste as a regular or additional fuel or in which waste is thermally treated for the purpose of disposal is to be regarded as a co-incineration plant.
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME gorivo ali v kateri se odpadki termično obdelajo z namenom odstranitve, �teje za napravo za sosežig.
The second subparagraph of Article 3(5) states that, if co-incineration takes place in such a way that the main purpose of the plant is not the generation of energy or production of material products but rather the thermal treatment of waste, the plant is to be regarded as an incineration plant within the meaning of Article 3(4).
V drugem odstavku navedenega člena 3, točka 5, je pojasnjeno, da se naprava �teje za „sežigalnico“ v smislu točke 4 istega člena, če sosežiganje poteka tako, da glavni namen naprave ni proizvodnja energije ali izdelkov, ampak toplotna obdelava odpadkov.
It is clear from the wording of those provisions that a co-incineration plant constitutes a particular form of incineration plant and that it is on the basis of the main purpose of a plant that the assessment of whether it is an incineration plant or a co-incineration plant is to be made.
Iz besedila teh določb jasno izhaja, da je naprava za sosežig posebna oblika sežigalnice in da je treba na podlagi glavnega namena naprave presoditi, ali je sežigalnica ali naprava za sosežig.
Assessment of the main purpose of a plant is made on the basis of facts existing at the time of that assessment, that is to say, on the capacity and function of that plant or, if the plant in question has not yet been built, on the basis of the plan in relation to which the application for an operating permit was made.
Treba je pojasniti, da se presoja glavnega namena naprave nana�a na dejstva, ki obstajajo v času presoje, in sicer o moči in delovanju te naprave, ali če zadevna naprava �e ni zgrajena, na načrt, na podlagi katerega je bila vložena pro�nja za izdajo dovoljenja za obratovanje.
In its written observations, the Swedish Government submits that an approach to classification of a plant based solely on the main purpose of that plant could circumvent the purpose of Directive 2000/76.
Švedska vlada v svojih pisnih stali�čih poudarja, da bi lahko pristop k opredelitvi naprave, ki bi temeljil izključno na njenem glavnem namenu, ob�el namen Direktive 2000/76.
Many incineration units originally designed and built to incinerate waste could be reclassified as co-incineration plants where the recovered heat is used to produce energy.
Številne enote za sežiganje, ki so bile sprva načrtovane in zgrajene za sežiganje odpadkov, bi se lahko namreč na novo opredelile kot naprave za sosežig, kadar se zajeta toplota uporabi za proizvodnjo energije.
Those units would thus avoid the stricter conditions applicable to incineration plants.
Te enote bi se torej izognile strožjim pogojem, ki veljajo za sežigalnice.
According to that Government, in order to distinguish between the two types of plant, it is more appropriate to base the assessment on the purpose for which the unit in question was built.
Po mnenju te vlade bi razlikovanje med vrstama naprav moralo temeljiti bolj na namenu, za katerega je bila obravnavana enota zgrajena.
Such an interpretation cannot, however, be accepted.
Take razlage vendarle ni mogoče sprejeti.
Firstly, it conflicts with the clear wording of Directive 2000/76.
Prvič, nasprotuje jasnemu besedilu Direktive 2000/76.
As the Commission pointed out in its observations before the Court, it is apparent from the express wording of Article 3(5) of that directive that it is on the basis of their main purpose that co-incineration plants are to be distinguished from incineration plants.
Kot je poudarila Komisija v svojih stali�čih pred Sodi�čem, iz člena 3, točka 5, te direktive izrecno izhaja, da se naprave za sosežig na podlagi svojega glavnega cilja razlikujejo od sežigalnic.
However, that provision does not specify any criterion with regard to the purpose for which the plant was built.
Nasprotno, v tej določbi ni nobenega merila v zvezi z namenom, za katerega je bila naprava zgrajena.
Secondly, as is apparent from recital 24 in the preamble to that directive and from Article 3(1)(b) of Directives 75/442 and 2006/12, the Community legislation on waste seeks to encourage, as far as practicable, the recovery of waste and, in particular, its use as a source of energy.
Drugič, kot izhaja iz uvodne izjave 24 navedene direktive in členov 3(1)(b) direktiv 75/442 in 2006/12, je namen skupnostne ureditve na področju odpadkov spodbujanje predelave odpadkov in zlasti njihova uporaba kot vir energije, če je to izvedljivo.
An overly restrictive interpretation of the concept of ‘co-incineration plant’ would be likely to hinder achievement of that objective.
Kajti preveč restriktivna razlaga pojma „naprava za sosežig“ bi lahko ne bila v skladu s tem namenom.
The application of stricter rules to plants whose main purpose is effectively the gener -ation of energy or production of material products could dissuade operators of such units from commencing or continuing an activity of that kind.
Uporaba strožjih pravil za naprave, katerih glavni namen je dejansko proizvodnja energije ali izdelkov, bi lahko odvrnila upravljavce takih enot, da začnejo ali nadaljujejo tako dejavnost.
Recital 24 in the preamble to Directive 2000/76 and Articles 4(2)(b) and 6(6) thereof expressly envisage, where it is possible, the recovery of heat produced not only in the co-incineration process but also in the incineration process.
V navedeni uvodni izjavi 24 ter členih 4(2)(b) in 6(6) Direktive 2000/76 je namreč izrecno predvidena izraba toplote, pridobljene tako v postopku sosežiga kot tudi v postopku sežiga, če je to izvedljivo.
Finally, it must be recalled that Directive 2000/76 imposes strict conditions for both types of plant and lays down specific safeguards for co-incineration plants.
Nazadnje je treba spomniti, da so v Direktivi 2000/76 določeni strogi pogoji za obe vrsti naprav in da so predvideni posebni varnostni ukrepi za naprave za sosežig.
For example, under the second subparagraph of Article 7(2), the emissions limit values laid down for incineration plants also apply to co-incineration plants when more than 40% of the released heat produced comes from hazardous waste. Furthermore,
Na primer, na podlagi njenega člena 7(2), drugi pododstavek, se mejne vrednosti emisij, določene za sežigalnice, uporabljajo tudi za naprave za sosežig, če več kot 40 %
As the Advocate General observed in points 43 to 47 of her Opinion, the main purpose of an incineration unit must be assessed objectively on the basis of a number of facts.
Kot je poudarila generalna pravobranilka v točkah od 43 do 47 sklepnih predlogov, mora glavni namen enote za sežiganje objektivno izhajati iz več dejstev.
In the context of such an assessment, it is for the competent authorities to examine the specific circumstances of each plant.
V okviru take presoje morajo posebne okoli�čine vsake naprave preveriti pristojni organi.