natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As is apparent from paragraphs 10 to 17 of this judgment, Directive 2005/85 adopts detailed criteria enabling the lists of safe countries to be established subsequently.
Kot izhaja iz točk od 10 do 17 te sodbe, so bila z Direktivo 2005/85 sprejeta podrobna merila, ki omogočajo vzpostavitev poznej�ih seznamov varnih držav.
Consequently it must be concluded that, by that legislative act, the Council adopted ‘Community legislation defining the common rules and basic principles’ within the meaning of the first indent of Article 67(5) EC, and therefore the co-decision procedure is applicable.
Zato je treba skleniti, da je Svet s tem zakonodajnim aktom sprejel „zakonodajo Skupnosti, ki opredeljuje skupna pravila in temeljna načela“ v smislu člena 67(5), prva alinea, ES, in se zato uporabi postopek soodločanja.
In the light of the foregoing, the first two pleas in law advanced by the Parliament in support of its application for annulment must be upheld and, accordingly, the contested provisions annulled.
Na podlagi vsega zgoraj navedenega je treba prva dva tožbena razloga, ki ju Parlament navaja v podporo ničnostni tožbi, sprejeti in zato izpodbijane določbe razglasiti za nične.
The third and fourth pleas in law, alleging a breach of the duty to state reasons for the contested provisions and failure to comply with the obligation to cooperate in good faith
Tretji in četrti tožbeni razlog v zvezi s kršitvijo obveznosti obrazložitve izpodbijanih določb in nespoštovanjem obveznosti lojalnega sodelovanja
Since the first two pleas in law are well founded, there is no need to examine the third and fourth pleas in law upon which the Parliament relied in support of its application.
Ker sta prva dva tožbena razloga utemeljena, ni treba obravnavati tretjega in četrtega tožbenega razloga, ki ju Parlament navaja v podporo svoji tožbi.
Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings.
V skladu s členom 69(2) Poslovnika se neuspeli stranki naloži plačilo stro�kov, če so bili ti prigla�eni. Ker je Parlament predlagal, naj se Svetu naloži plačilo stro�kov, in
Since the Parliament has applied for the Council to be ordered to pay the costs and the Council has been unsuccessful, the Council must be ordered to pay the costs.
2008 – ZADEVA C-133/06 ker ta s predlogi ni uspel, se mu naloži plačilo stro�kov.
Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 69(4), the interveners in this case are to bear their own costs.
Na podlagi člena 69(4), prvi pododstavek, intervenienti v tem sporu nosijo svoje stro�ke.
Annuls Articles 29(1) and (2) and 36(3) of Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status;
Člen 29(1) in (2) ter člen 36(3) Direktive Sveta 2005/85/ES z dne 1. decembra 2005 o minimalnih standardih glede postopkov za priznanje ali odvzem statusa begunca v državah članicah se razglasita za nična.
Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs;
Svetu Evropske unije se naloži plačilo stroškov.
Orders the French Republic and the Commission of the European Communities to bear their own costs.
Francoska republika in Komisija Evropskih skupnosti nosita svoje stroške.
Joined Cases C-5/06 and C-23/06 to C-36/06
Združene zadeve C-5/06 in od C-23/06 do C-36/06
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf and from the Tribunal de grande instance de Nanterre)
(Predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki sta jih vložili Finanzgericht Düsseldorf in tribunal de grande instance de Nanterre)
(Sugar — Production levies — Detailed rules for the application of the quota system — Calculation of the exportable surplus — Calculation of the average loss)
„Sladkor – Proizvodne dajatve – Podrobna pravila za izvajanje sistema kvot – Določitev presežka, ki se izvozi – Določitev povprečne izgube“
I - 3234Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 8 May 2008 . . . . . . . . . . .
Sharpston, predstavljeni 14. junija 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SUMMARY — JOINED CASES C-5/06 AND C-23/06 TO C-36/06
POVZETEK – ZDRUŽENE ZADEVE C-5/06 IN OD C-23/06 DO C-36/06
Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Sugar (Council Regulation No 1260/2001, Art. 15(1)(b) and (c))
Kmetijstvo – Skupna ureditev trgov – Sladkor (Uredba Sveta št. 1260/2001, člen 15(1)(b) in (c))
Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Sugar
Kmetijstvo – Skupna ureditev trgov – Sladkor
(Council Regulation No 1260/2001, Art. 15(1)(d); Commission Regulations No 1837/2002, No 1762/2003 and No 1775/2004)
(Uredba Sveta št. 1260/2001, člen 15(1)(d); uredbe Komisije št. 1837/2002, št. 1762/2003 in št. 1775/2004)
The exportable surplus includes quantities of products for the disposal of which Community support measures have been laid down.
Presežek, ki se izvozi, vključuje količine proizvodov, za prodajo katerih so predvideni ukrepi podpore Skupnosti.
Pursuant to Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 1260/2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector, for the purpose of calculating the exportable surplus, all the quantities of exported products which fall under that article must, regardless of whether or not refunds have actually been paid, be subtracted from consumption.
Na podlagi člena 15(1)(c) Uredbe �t. 1260/2001 o skupni ureditvi trgov za sladkor je pri izračunu presežka, ki se izvozi, iz tega člena treba od porabe od�teti vse količine izvoženih proizvodov ne glede na to, ali so bila nadomestila dejansko izplačana.
Moreover, if quantities exported without refunds were included in the account of consumption within the Community, that account would be overvalued.
Poleg tega, če bi se dodalo količine, ki so bile izvožene brez nadomestil, k notranji porabi, bi bila ta previsoko ocenjena.
As a consequence, the exportable surplus would be underestimated.
Posledično bi bil presežek, ki se izvozi, prenizko ocenjen.
Thus, there is a risk that the objective pursued by the system of the self-financing of the costs of disposing of surpluses — which has been to ensure, in a fair yet efficient way, that the producers themselves meet those costs in full — would not be achieved.
Prav tako bi obstajalo tveganje, da se ne doseže cilj sistema samofinanciranja stro�kov prodaje presežkov – da se pravično, vendar učinkovito zagotovi, da proizvajalci sami v celoti pokrijejo te stro�ke.
(see paras 37-39, 44, 45, 68, operative part)
(Glej točke od 37 do 39, 44, 45, 68 in izrek.)
As the exportable surplus is the difference between Community production under quotas A and B and consumption within the Community, the latter is not intended to include the quantities of exported products, regardless of whether they have or have not benefited from export refunds.
Ker namreč presežek, ki se izvozi, ustreza razliki med proizvodnjo Skupnosti ob upo�tevanju kvot A in B ter notranjo porabo, se v to porabo ne more vključiti količin izvoženih proizvodov ne glede na to, ali se za njih izplačajo izvozna nadomestila.
The quantities of exported products cannot be considered to have been disposed of for consumption within the Community, within the meaning of Article 15(1)(b) of Regulation No 1260/2001.
Količine izvoženih proizvodov se namreč ne morejo obravnavati kot količine, ki se prodajo za porabo v Skupnosti v smislu člena 15(1)(b) Uredbe �t. 1260/2001.
financing of the costs of disposing of Community production surpluses, in accordance with the principle of self-financing.
v presežkov proizvodnje Skupnosti skladu z načelom samofinanciranja.
Article 15(1)(d) of Regulation No 1260/2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector is to be interpreted as meaning that all the quantities of exported products which fall under that article, regardless of whether or not refunds have actually been paid, are to be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the estimated average loss per tonne of product.
Člen 15(1)(d) Uredbe �t. 1260/2001 o skupni ureditvi trgov za sladkor je treba razlagati tako, da je treba pri določanju predvidene povprečne izgube na tono proizvoda upo�tevati vse količine izvoženih proizvodov iz tega člena ne glede na to, ali so bila nadomestila dejansko izplačana.
Consequently, Regulations No 1762/2003 and No 1775/2004 fixing production levies in the sugar sector for the marketing years 2002/03 and 2003/04, which apply that method, are invalid.
1762/2003 in 1775/2004, s katerima so bili za tržni leti 2002/2003 in 2003/2004 določeni zneski proizvodnih dajatev v sektorju sladkorja in v katerih je uporabljena navedena metoda, nista veljavni.
By contrast, examination of Regulation No 1837/2002, which refers to the marketing year 2001/02, has not disclosed the existence of any factors liable to affect its validity since the average loss was calculated on the basis of the total quantities of sugar exported in the form of processed products, regardless of whether or not those exports had actually benefited from refunds.
Nasprotno pa ni bil v zvezi z Uredbo �t. 1837/2002, ki se nana�a na tržno leto 2001/2002, pri njeni preučitvi ugotovljen noben dejavnik, ki bi lahko vplival na njeno veljavnost, ker je bila povprečna izguba izračunana tako, da so se upo�tevale vse količine izvoženega sladkorja v obliki predelanih proizvodov ne glede na to, ali so bila za izvoz izplačana nadomestila.
The estimated total loss — obtained by multiplying the exportable surplus by the average loss — will be excessive if a product may be considered to have been exported for the purpose of calculating the exportable surplus but was not correspondingly taken into account for the purpose of the calculation of the average loss, the denominator of which is the total tonnage of export obligations to be fulfilled during the current marketing year.
Predvidena skupna izguba, ki se izračuna tako, da se presežek, ki se izvozi, pomnoži s povprečno izgubo, bi bila namreč previsoko ocenjena, če bi se proizvod lahko obravnavalo kot izvožen pri izračunu presežka, ki se izvozi, ne bi se ga pa ustrezno upo�tevalo pri izračunu povprečne izgube, katerega imenovalec je skupna tonaža izvoznih obveznosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti v tekočem tržnem letu.
Thus, with the exception of the largely theoretical case in which all exports benefit from refunds, the system introduced by the Commission, by excluding from export obligations the quantities exported without refunds, inasmuch as it resulted, in practice, in fixing a priori the total loss at an amount greater than that of the costs linked to refunds, goes beyond the objective of Regulation No 1260/2001, and in particular beyond that of the equitable
Če se tako ne upo�teva večinoma teoretičen primer, ko bi bilo za vsak izvoz izplačano nadomestilo, presega sistem, ki ga je uvedla Komisija, v skladu s katerim se količine, izvožene brez nadomestil, izključi iz izvoznih obveznosti, s tem da se tako v praksi a priori določi znesek skupne izgube, ki je vi�ji od zneska stro�kov, povezanih z nadomestili, cilj Uredbe �t. 1260/2001 in zlasti pravično financiranje stro�kov prodaje
(see paras 53, 54, 60, 61, 63-66, 68, operative part)
(Glej točke 53, 54, 60, 61, od 63 do 66, 68 in izrek.)
OPINION OF MS SHARPSTON — JOINED CASES C-5/06 AND C-23/06 TO C-36/06
SHARPSTON – ZADEVA C-5/06 IN ZDRUŽENE ZADEVE OD C-23/06 DO C-36/06
SHARPSTONdelivered on 14 June 2007
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI GENERALNE PRAVOBRANILKEELEANOR SHARPSTON, predstavljeni 14. junija 2007 1
In the present cases the Court is asked whether the method of calculation applied by the Commission for setting the amount of production levies intended to finance the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector is valid.
V obravnavani zadevi je Sodi�če vpra�ano, ali je veljavna metoda izračuna, ki jo je Komisija uporabila za določitev zneska proizvodne dajatve za financiranje skupne ureditve trgov za sladkor.
Production levies are intended in particular to reflect the cost to the Community of export refunds, or payments which are made in certain circumstances to compensate sugar producers for the fact that world prices of sugar are, in general, lower than the supported Community price.
Proizvodne dajatve naj bi izražale zlasti stro�ke, ki jih ima Skupnost z izvoznimi nadomestili ali s plačili, ki se opravijo v določenih okoli�činah zaradi od�kodovanja proizvajalcev sladkorja zaradi splo�no nižjih svetovnih cen sladkorja od skupnostnih za�čitnih cen.
A number of sugar producers challenge the lawfulness of two aspects of the calculation of production levies.
Več proizvajalcev sladkorja izpodbija zakonitost dveh vidikov izračuna proizvodnih dajatev.
The ‘exportable surplus’ is defined, essentially, as the production of sugar minus sugar quantities ‘disposed of for consumption within the Community’. The latter concept is defined, essentially, as the total of opening sugar stocks, sugar production and sugar imports, minus the total of closing sugar stocks and exported sugar.
„Presežek, ki se izvozi“, je v bistvu proizvodnja sladkorja, zmanj�ana za količino, „ki se proda za porabo v Skupnosti.“ Ta koncept v bistvu pomeni skupne začetne zaloge, proizvodnjo sladkorja in uvoz sladkorja, zmanj�ano za skupne končne zaloge sladkorja in izvoženi sladkor.
Exported sugar comprises sugar exported in the natural state and sugar ‘contained in exported processed products’. The applicant sugar producers submit, first, that sugar which is contained in exported processed products and in respect of which no export refunds were paid should not be regarded as sugar ‘contained in exported processed products’ for the purpose of this calculation.
Izvoženi sladkor vključuje sladkor, izvožen v naravnem stanju, in sladkor, „ki ga vsebujejo izvoženi predelani proizvodi.“ Tožeči proizvajalci sladkorja trdijo, prvič, da za navedeni izračun „sladkorja, ki ga vsebujejo izvoženi proizvodi in v zvezi s katerim niso bila izplačana izvozna nadomestila, ne bi smeli �teti za sladkor, ‚ki ga vsebujejo izvoženi predelani proizvodi‘“.
The first step of that calculation requires the overall loss for a given marketing year to be estimated before the end of that marketing year by multiplying the ‘exportable surplus’ by the estimated ‘average loss’ per tonne.
Prvi korak navedenega izračuna zahteva, da se skupna izguba v danem tržnem letu oceni pred koncem tega tržnega leta, in sicer tako, da se „presežek, ki se izvozi“, pomnoži z ocenjeno „povprečno izgubo“ na tono.
The ‘average loss’ per tonne is defined, essentially, as the total amount of refunds divided by the total tonnage of ‘export obligations to be fulfilled’ in the marketing year concerned.
„Povprečna izguba“ na tono je v bistvu skupen znesek nadomestil, deljen s celotno tonažo „izvoznih obveznosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti“ v zadevnem tržnem letu.
In the alternative, the applicant sugar producers submit that if (contrary to their principal submission) sugar ‘contained in exported processed products’ includes all such sugar, whether or not export refunds
Tožeči proizvajalci sladkorja podredno trdijo – v nasprotju s svojo glavno trditvijo – da če sladkor, „ki ga vsebujejo izvoženi predelani proizvodi“, vključuje ves sladkor, ne glede na to, ali so bila izplačana izvozna nadomestila,
ZUCKERFABRIK JÜLICH AND OTHERS
ZUCKERFABRIK JÜLICH IN DRUGI uredba), ki se je uporabljala za tržna leta od 2001/2002 do 2005/2006.
No 1260/2001 2 (‘the basic regulation’), which applied for the 2001/02 to 2005/06 marketing years. 3 were paid, ‘export obligations to be fulfilled’ should similarly include all exports of sugar, including those in respect of which no export refunds were paid.
3 potem bi morale „izvozne obveznosti, ki jih je treba izpolniti“, podobno vključevati ves izvoz sladkorja, vključno s tistim, v zvezi s katerim niso bila izplačana izvozna nadomestila.
The following recitals 4 in the preamble to the basic regulation are relevant:
Upo�tevni sta naslednji dve uvodni izjavi 4iz preambule osnovne uredbe:
It is common ground that (at least) the principal objective of production levies is to ensure that sugar producers finance the costs of disposing of excess Community production.
Ni sporno, da je (vsaj) glavni cilj proizvodnih dajatev zagotoviti, da proizvajalci sladkorja financirajo stro�ke prodaje presežne Skupnostne proizvodnje.
The sugar producers submit that the Commission’s method of calculating the levies results in their paying more than those costs.
Proizvajalci sladkorja trdijo, da je rezultat Komisijine metode izračuna dajatev to, da morajo plačevati več, kot zna�ajo navedeni stro�ki.
However, that system has been adjusted to take account of recent developments in production, to provide the Community with the instruments necessary to ensure, in a fair yet efficient way, that the producers themselves meet in full the cost of disposing of the surpluses of Community production over consumption and to comply with the Community’s obligations under the Agreements
Vendar je bil ta sistem prilagojen, upo�tevajoč zdaj�nji razvoj v proizvodnji, da Skupnost pridobi potrebne instrumente, zato da se pravično, vendar učinkovito zagotovi, da proizvajalci sami v celoti pokrijejo stroške prodaje presežkov proizvodnje Skupnosti nad porabo in so tako izpolnjene obveznosti Skupnosti iz sporazumov, sklenjenih glede na
3 — Article 51.
3 – Glej člen 51.
The marketing year runs from 1 July to 30 June (Article 1(2)(m)).
Tržno leto traja od 1. julija do 30. junija (člen 1(2)(m)).
Subsequent marketing years are regulated by Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (OJ 2006 L 58, p.
Nadaljnja tržna leta ureja Uredba Sveta (ES) �t. 318/2006 z dne 20. februarja 2006 o skupni ureditvi trgov v sektorju sladkorja (UL L 58, str.
1), which repeals and replaces the basic regulation.
1), ki razveljavlja in nadome�ča osnovno uredbo.
4 — I have italicised the phrases in the recitals which are of particular relevance.
2 – Uredba z dne 19. junija 2001 o skupni ureditvi trgov za sladkor (UL L 178, str. 1).
The common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector was at the material time regulated by Council Regulation (EC)
4 – Dele uvodnih izjav, ki so �e posebej upo�tevni, sem zapisala ležeče.
The sector’s system of self-financing through production levies and the production quota regime should be maintained.
Sistem samofinanciranja sektorja s proi­zvodnimi dajatvami in ureditev s proi­zvodnimi kvotami je treba obdržati.
In certain circumstances, producers of isoglucose and insulin syrup also pay a proportion of those contributions.
Pod določenimi pogoji plačajo del teh prispevkov tudi proizvajalci izoglukoze in inulinskega sirupa.
Capping the levies in the manner described above means that in some marketing years sugar production is not fully self-financing.
Pod zgoraj navede­nimi pogoji s temi omejitvami ni mogoče doseči samofinanciranja sektorja za nekatera tržna leta.
An additional levy should be charged in those cases.
V takšnih primerih je treba zaračunati dodatno dajatev.
A sugar production quota is allocated to each undertaking on the basis of its actual production during a particular reference period.
Proizvodna kvota za sladkor se dodeli vsakemu podjetju na podlagi njegove dejanske proizvodnje v določenem referenčnem obdobju.
5 — The Agreement on agriculture resulting from the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations.
5 – Sporazum o kmetijstvu, ki izhaja iz urugvajskega kroga večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj.
ZUCKERFABRIK JÜLICH AND OTHERS
ZUCKERFABRIK JÜLICH IN DRUGI nastanejo zaradi prodaje presežne proizvodnje, in sicer s proizvodno dajatvijo, ki se izračuna skladno s členom 15 osnovne uredbe.
Article 15 cannot be understood without the following information.
Prav tako je treba določiti pogoje, pod katerimi prodajalci sladkorne pese in sladkornega trsa sodelujejo pri odpravljanju nepokritih izgub za zadevno tržno leto.
It is necessary to specify the conditions under which beet and cane sellers are to contribute to eliminating the outstanding loss for the marketing year concerned.
Jamstva v zvezi s kvotami je treba prilagoditi v vsakem tržnem letu, da Skupnost lahko izpolni svoje obveznosti.“
Article 11(2) of the basic regulation fixes a basic quantity A and a basic quantity B for each sugarproducing region of the Community.
Člen 11(2) osnovne uredbe določa osnovno količino A in osnovno količino B za vsako regijo Skupnosti, ki prideluje sladkor.
7Article 11(1) requires the Member States to allocate an A and a B quota to each undertaking producing sugar, isoglucose or inulin syrup 8in its territory during the 2000/01 marketing year.
7 Člen 11(1) od držav članic zahteva, da dodelijo kvote A in B vsakemu podjetju, ki proizvaja sladkor, izoglukozo ali inulinski sirup 8na njihovem ozemlju v tržnem letu 2000/2001.
The A and B quotas are subject to the production levy at
Za kvote A in B velja drugačna
7 — These are not necessarily coterminous with the Member States.
7 – Ozemlje regij ne ustreza nujno ozemlju držav članic.
Thus, there are separate quotas for metropolitan France on the one hand and the French overseas departments on the other hand; similarly for mainland Portugal and the autonomous region of the Azores.
Tako obstajajo ločene kvote za celinsko Francijo in francoske čezmorske departmaje; podobno velja za Portugalsko in avtonomno regijo Azorov.
Belgium and Luxembourg share quotas (nominally attributed to the Belgium/Luxembourg Economic Union).
Belgija in Luksemburg si kvote delita (uradno so odobrene Belgijsko-luksembur�ki gospodarski uniji).
8 — The original version of the basic regulation incorrectly referred to ‘insulin’ rather than ‘inulin’ syrup.
6 – „Izguba“ in „izgube” (ter seveda „dohodek“), na katere se sklicujejo uvodne izjave, zadevajo financiranje organizacije trga s strani Skupnosti in ne bilance proizvajalcev, izvoznikov itd.
This was corrected by a corrigendum published in OJ 2001 L 233, p. 58.
8 – [Začetek opombe ni upo�teven za slovensko različico skle -pnih predlogov].
Isoglucose and inulin syrup are liquid substitutes for sugar: see recital 1 in the preamble to the basic regulation.
Izoglukoza in inulinski sirup sta tekoči nadomestili za sladkor: glej uvodno izjavo 1 preambule k osnovni uredbi.
More detailed definitions may be found in Article 1(2)(c) and (d) of the basic regulation.
Podrobnej�a opredelitev je v členu 1(2)(c) in (d) osnovne uredbe.
The basic regulation sets an intervention price 12and essentially requires the inter- a different rate.
Osnovna uredba določa intervencijsko ceno 12in v bistvu zahteva, da intervencijski stopnja proizvodne dajatve.
9Since the cases before the Court concern sugar only, I shall henceforth consider the legislation only in so far as it concerns that product.
9 Glede na to, da zadeve pred Sodi�čem zadevajo samo sladkor, bom v nadaljevanju zakonodajo obravnavala samo, kolikor zadeva ta proizvod.
vention agency designated by each sugarproducing Member State to buy in, at the intervention price, any sugar offered to it which has been produced under quota from Community beet and cane. 13
organ, ki ga imenuje vsaka država članica, ki prideluje sladkor, odkupi ves ponujeni in v okviru kvot proizvedeni sladkor, proizveden iz sladkorne pese in sladkornega trsa, pridelanega v Skupnosti. 13
Sugar produced in a given marketing year in excess of the total of the A and B quotas of the undertaking concerned, or by an undertaking which has no quota, is referred to as ‘C sugar’. As a general rule, 10C sugar may not be disposed of within the Community and must be exported without further processing and without export aid before 1 January following the end of the marketing year concerned. 11
Sladkor, ki se proizvede v določenem tržnem letu in presega skupne kvote A in B zadevnega podjetja ali podjetja, ki mu kvota ni bila dodeljena, se imenuje „sladkor C.“ Sladkorja C načeloma 10ni dovoljeno prodati v Skupnosti, temveč ga je treba izvoziti v nepredelani obliki pred 1. januarjem, ki sledi koncu zadevnega tržnega leta. 11