natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
However, in the light of the caselaw cited, those pleas in the main appeal should either be declared inadmissible or, as the Court has already had occasion to do, 48be reclassified as alleging the absence or inadequacy of the statement of reasons in the judgment under appeal as regards the criteria taken into account in determining the compensation for the damage, in order to render those grounds of appeal meaningful.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno sodno prakso pa bi ti očitki, da bi postali učinkoviti, morali biti bodisi razgla�eni za nedopustne bodisi bi morali biti spremenjeni, kot je Sodi�če že imelo priložnost storiti, 48 tako da bi se nana�ali na manjkajočo ali pomanjkljivo obrazložitev izpodbijane sodbe glede meril, ki so bila upo�tevana pri določanju od�kodnine.
Nonetheless, and on the other hand, the Commission does not confine itself to challenging the extent of the compensation for the damage, but identifies, in my view, in its single plea in support of its claims, a genuine error of law which allegedly renders the judgment under appeal unlawful.
Na drugi strani pa se Komisija ne omeji na izpodbijanje obsega od�kodnine, ampak po moji presoji v svoji edini utemeljitvi svojih predlogov v izpodbijani sodbi celo prepozna napačno uporabo prava.
As a preliminary point, it should be recalled that, according to the case-law, once the Court of First Instance has found the existence of damage, it alone has jurisdiction to assess, within the confines of the claim, the method and extent of compensation for that damage.
Uvodoma je treba opozoriti, da je v skladu s sodno prakso Sodi�če prve stopnje, ko ugotovi obstoj �kode, edino pristojno, da v okviru zahtevka oceni način in obseg nadomestila te �kode.
46The Court has nonetheless stated that in order for it to be able to review the judgments of the Court of First Instance, those judgments must state sufficient reasons and, in particular, set out the criteria taken into account for the purposes of determining the amount selected. 47
46Sodi�če je kljub temu pojasnilo, da morajo biti sodbe Sodi�ča prve stopnje dovolj utemeljene, da lahko izvr�uje sodni nadzor nad njimi, in zlasti da morajo vsebovati merila, ki so bila upo�tevana za določitev zneska. 47
In the present case, the main appeal certainly contains some ambiguities as to the criticisms it contains of the judgment under appeal.
V pričujoči zadevi pritožba gotovo vsebuje nekaj dvoumnosti v zvezi s kritikami na račun izpodbijane sodbe.
Indeed, although it does not — and cannot — call into question the finding, made in the interim judgment, as to the existence of damage caused by the unlawful act committed, the Commission argues, in essence, that the compensation awarded by the Court of First Instance in the judgment under appeal is not concerned with the damage found to exist in the interim judgment, but, on the contrary, other damage, that is to say the loss of a guarantee of obtaining a post and the loss of earnings relating thereto. In that regard,
Ne da bi izpodbijala – in da bi lahko izpodbijala – ugotovitev iz vmesne sodbe o obstoju �kode, ki jo je povzročila nezakonitost, Komisija v bistvu navede, da se od�kodnina, ki jo je določilo Sodi�če prve stopnje v izpodbijani sodbi, ne nana�a na �kodo, ugotovljeno v vmesni sodbi, ampak nasprotno na drugo �kodo, in sicer izgubo gotovosti zapo-
47 — See, in particular, Council v De Nil and Impens, paragraphs 32 and 33, and the order in Meister v OHIM, paragraph 82.
47 – Glej zlasti zgoraj navedeno sodbo Svet proti de Nil in Impens (točki 32 in 33) pa tudi zgoraj navedeni sklep Meister proti UUNT (točka 82).
48 — Lucaccioni v Commission, paragraph 36.
48 – Zgoraj navedena sodba Lucaccioni proti Komisiji (točka 36).
I therefore propose that the main appeal should be declared admissible, provided that the claims in that appeal criticising the extent of the compensation for the damage are interpreted so as to relate to the absence or inadequancy of the statement of reasons in the judgment under appeal.
Predlagam, da Sodi�če razglasi pritožbo za dopustno pod pogojem, da se očitke iz te pritožbe o obsegu od�kodnine razlaga na način, da se nana�ajo na manjkajočo ali pomanjkljivo obrazložitev izpodbijane sodbe.
Substance the Commission therefore claims that, by adopting the criticised method, the Court of First Instance wrongly interpreted the conditions governing the noncontractual liability of the Community, either by making good damage which was not actual and certain or by misinterpreting the extent of the causal link between the unlawful act committed and the damage suffered.
Temelj slitve in izgubo s tem povezanega plačila. V tem smislu Komisija meni, da naj bi Sodi�če prve stopnje z uporabo kritizirane metode spremenilo pogoje uveljavljanja nepogodbene odgovornosti Skupnosti, ker je bodisi določilo od�kodnino za �kodo, ki ni dejanska in gotova, bodisi ni primerno ocenilo stopnje vzročne zveze med nezakonitostjo in �kodo.
In other words, although the Court of First Instance has indeed found the existence of damage, it has nevertheless made good not that damage, but other damage, of a type which does not satisfy the conditions laid down by the caselaw in order to be reparable.
Z drugimi besedami, čeprav je Sodi�če prve stopnje res ugotovilo obstoj �kode, ni nadomestilo te �kode, ampak drugo �kodo, za kar naj ne bi bili izpolnjeni pogoji, ki jih je za od�kodnino predvidela sodna praksa.
Such an issue, clearly legal in nature, must, in my view, be subject to review by the Court in the context of the appeal.
Tako vpra�anje, ki je gotovo pravne narave, po mojem preudarku ne bi smelo uiti nadzoru Sodi�ča v okviru pritožbe.
In essence, the Commission argues, with reference to paragraph 58 of the judgment under appeal, that the material damage was calculated on the basis of the criterion of the difference in earnings, thus wrongly interpreting the loss of an opportunity as being the loss of a guarantee of obtaining a post.
Komisija kritizira, ob sklicevanju na točko 58 izpodbijane sodbe, dejstvo, da je bila premoženjska �koda izračunana na podlagi merila razlike v plačilu in da je bila tako izguba možnosti spremenjena v izgubo gotovosti zaposlitve.
In its view, the existence of an error of law on the part of the Court of First Instance is confirmed by other evidence, as stated in point 37 above.
Po njenem mnenju naj bi bila napačna uporaba prava podkrepljena z drugimi elementi, kot je bilo predstavljeno v točki 37 teh sklepnih predlogov.
Those criticisms are the result, in my view, of a partial misreading of the judgment under appeal.
Te kritike izhajajo po mojem preudarku iz deloma napačnega razumevanja izpodbijane sodbe.
Nor is it possible to claim, contrary to Ms Girardot’s submission in her objection of inadmissibility, that, insofar as the Commission’s line of argument disputes the actual and certain nature of the damage, it is inadmissible since it was not submitted at first instance.
Nasprotno kot je M.-C. Girardot zagovarjala v ugovoru nedopustnosti, prav tako ni mogoče zatrjevati, da naj bi bila utemeljitev Komisije glede nasprotovanja dejanskosti in gotovosti �kode nedopustna, ker naj jo ta ne bi uveljavljala na prvi stopnji.
It is indeed clear that the findings criticised by the Commission appear for the first time in the judgment under appeal, which must lead to the dismissal of the claim put forward by Ms Girardot that the plea is a new one. 49
Očitno je, da se ugotovitve, ki jih izpodbija Komisija, prvič pojavijo v izpodbijani sodbi, iz česar mora slediti, da je treba zavrniti trditve M.-C. Girardot o novem pritožbenem razlogu. 49
49 — See, in that regard, Case C-229/05 P PKK and KNK v Council [2007] ECR I-439, paragraph 33.
49 – Glej v tem smislu sodbo z dne 18. januarja 2007 v zadevi PKK in KNK proti Svetu (C-229/05 P, ZOdl., str. I-439, točka 33).
Indeed, it should be acknowledged that the assessment in paragraph 58 of the judgment under appeal is vitiated by an error of law.
Res je treba priznati, da sklepanje v točki 58 izpodbijane sodbe temelji na napačni uporabi prava.
OPINION OF MR MENGOZZI — CASE C-348/06 P one.
MENGOZZIJA – ZADEVA C-348/06 P upanja, ki mora biti resno, kot to zahteva sodna praksa. Možnost je morala biti prava.
Accordingly, the assessment of the chance that Ms Girardot had of having her application accepted cannot be optional, since it forms part of the very definition of the notion of loss of opportunity.
Tako ocena možnosti, da bi bila prijava M.-C. Girardot sprejeta, ne more biti fakultativna, ker je vsebovana v opredelitvi izgube možnosti.
It should be pointed out that, in that paragraph of the grounds of the judgment under appeal, the Court of First Instance presented the approach it was going to adopt for the purposes of assessing the extent of the damage suffered by Ms Girardot.
Treba je opozoriti, da je v tej točki obrazložitve izpodbijane sodbe Sodi�če predstavilo postopek, ki ga bo uporabilo za določitev ocene �kode, ki jo je utrpela M.-C. Girardot.
To that end, it therefore stated that it was appropriate ‘to determine the difference between the earnings which Ms Girardot would have received in the event that her opportunity of having her application accepted had materialised and those which she actually received following the unlawful rejection of her application, and then, if appropriate, to assess, as a percentage, the chance that Ms Girardot had of that eventuality materialising’. 50
Navedlo je, da je v ta namen treba „za oceno obsega �kode zaradi izgube možnosti, o čemer teče spor med strankama v tem primeru, ugotoviti razliko med plačilom, ki bi ga M.-C. prejemala, če bi bila njena prijava sprejeta, in plačilom, ki ga je dejansko prejemala po nezakonitem zavrženju njene prijave, ter, če je to ustrezno, oceniti v obliki odstotkov možnosti, ki jih je imela M.-C. Girardot za uresničitev navedene hipoteze“. 50
However, by introducing the second stage of the reasoning it was to adopt with the words ‘if appropriate’, the Court of First Instance seems to take the view that that stage is merely optional, whereas, legally, in the case of the loss of an opportunity to be recruited, such a stage is mandatory.
Zdi se, da je Sodi�če prve stopnje z uvedbo drugega dela sklepanja, ki sledi besedni zvezi „če je to ustrezno“, menilo, da je ta del le fakultativen, medtem ko je s pravnega vidika v primeru izgube možnosti zaposlitve tak del obvezen.
However, I take the view that the error of law on the part of the Court of First Instance cannot result in the annulment of the judgment under appeal.
Vendar pa dejstvo, da je Sodi�če prve stopnje napačno uporabilo pravo, po mojem preudarku ne vodi k razveljavitvi izpodbijane sodbe.
Indeed, it is common ground that, in paragraphs 96 to 122 of the latter, the Court of First Instance actually assessed in concreto the chance — described, incidentally, as genuine — that Ms Girardot had of filling the posts for which she had submitted her application, with the result that it is not possible to take the view, as the Commission wrongly claims, that the material damage found to exist in the judgment under appeal is equal only to the difference between the earnings which Ms Girardot would have received if one of her applications had been accepted by the Commission and those which she actually received.
Gotovo je, da je v točkah od 96 do 122 te sodbe Sodi�če prve stopnje obravnavalo in concreto ter kasneje ocenilo za resno možnost, ki jo je imela M.-C. Girardot, da se zaposli na delovnih mestih, za katera je poslala svojo prijavo, tako da ni mogoče pritrditi Komisiji, da je premoženjska �koda, ki je bila ugotovljena v izpodbijani sodbi, enaka samo razliki med plačilom, ki bi ga M.-C. Girardot prejela, če bi Komisija sprejela eno od njenih prijav, in plačilom, ki ga je dejansko prejemala.
Indeed, it should be borne in mind that the loss of an opportunity constitutes damage in itself, as the Commission also acknowledges.
Treba je upo�tevati, da izguba možnosti sama po sebi pomeni �kodo, kot med drugim priznava Komisija.
With regard to the loss of an opportunity of being recruited, it is not the anticipated amounts which constitute the damage, but the expectation of earning them.
Glede izgube možnosti zaposlitve pomeni �kodo upanje, da bo oseba zaslužila določeni znesek, in ne pričakovani znesek kot tak.
When awarding damages, a court must take into account the level of the expectation, which must, as required by the case-law, be real.
Pri določanju od�kodnine mora sodnik upo�tevati pomembnost tega
In that regard, the Commission’s criticisms concerning the taking into account, in the judgment under appeal, of the loss of earnings as a criterion for assessing the loss of an opportunity to be recruited are also untenable.
V zvezi s tem kritike Komisije, ki so usmerjene proti temu, da je izguba plačila v izpodbijani sodbi upo�tevana kot merilo za oceno izgube možnosti zaposlitve, prav tako ne morejo uspeti.
50 — Emphasis added.
50 – Moj povdarek.
First Instance merely applied the criteria governing the noncontractual liability of the Community, in the specific context of the loss of an opportunity to be recruited.
KOMISIJA PROTI GIRARDOT metodo, ki upo�teva pričakovano plačilo in resno možnost M.-C. Girardot, da bi dobila tako zaposlitev, je samo uporabilo merila za uveljavljanje nepogodbene odgovornosti Skupnosti v posebnem okviru uporabe za izgubo možnosti zaposlitve.
It is true, as the Commission states, that Ms Girardot had no right to be recruited.
Res je, kot je poudarila Komisija, da M.-C. Girardot ni imela pravice do zaposlitve.
That assertion is not contradicted by the judgment under appeal.
Te trditve izpodbijana sodba ne zanika.
The Court of First Instance even expressly confirmed it in paragraph 72 of the judgment under appeal, which, therefore, excludes the existence of any contradiction between the judgment under appeal and paragraph 57 of the interim judgment, contrary to the claims of the Commission.
Sodi�če prve stopnje je to celo izrecno v točki 72 izpodbijane sodbe potrdilo, kar torej nasprotno trditvam Komisije izklju -čuje protislovje med izpodbijano sodbo in točko 57 vmesne sodbe.
Moreover, it is interesting to note that the alternative method proposed by the Commission is also based on the criterion of earnings, in that it proposes to compensate Ms Girardot by awarding financial compensation the amount of which would be set at three months’ net earnings paid in respect of the minimum notice period provided for by Article 47(2)(a) of the Conditions of Employment.
Nadalje sem z zanimanjem opazil, da alternativna metoda, ki jo predlaga Komisija, prav tako upo�teva merilo plačila, v smislu da Komisija predlaga, da se M.-C. Girardot plača od�kodnino, ki naj bi zna�ala tri neto mesečne plače, izplačane na podlagi minimalnega odpovednega roka, ki je predviden v členu 47(2)(a) PZDU.
Nevertheless, the absence of a right to be recruited does not mean that the criterion of earnings cannot be taken into consideration in assessing the material damage arising from the loss of an opportunity to be recruited, provided that that assessment also takes into account the likelihood of being recruited and that it is carried out in the light of the parties’ claims, as the Court of First Instance did in the judgment under appeal.
Neobstoj pravice do zaposlitve pa ne pomeni, da se ne more upo�tevati merila plačila pri oceni premoženjske �kode zaradi izgube možnosti zaposlitve, če ta ocena upo�teva tudi stopnjo možnosti, da se ta zaposlitev uresniči, in če je narejena v skladu z zahtevki strank, kar je Sodi�če prve stopnje storilo v izpodbijani sodbi.
However, even if such a method of compensation — which is based on the assumption that the Commission would have been entitled unilaterally to terminate the employment of Ms Girardot without reason and immediately after it had taken effect — 51, were possible, the fact remains
Če predpostavljamo, da je taka od�kodnina, ki izhaja iz trditve, da bi Komisija imela pravico enostransko odpovedati pogodbo o zaposlitvi M.-C. Girardot brez utemeljitve in takoj, ko bi začela veljati, 51 mogoča, vendarle
Indeed, the unlawful act found to exist, that is the failure to demonstrate that a consideration of comparative merits had been carried out, certainly deprived Ms Girardot of the opportunity of filling the coveted posts and, therefore, of the opportunity of receiving the earnings relating thereto.
Zaradi ugotovljene nezakonitosti, to je neobstoja dokaza, da je bila primerjalna ocena uspe�nosti izvedena, je M.-C. Girardot zagotovo izgubila možnost, da bi se zaposlila na želenih delovnih mestih, in torej možnost, da bi prejemala plačilo, ki je z njimi povezano.
If the approach proposed by the Commission were to be accepted, it would, in the final analysis, be liable to lead the court hearing the substance of the case to fail to observe the principle of full compensation for the damage.
Če bi bil pristop, ki ga predlaga Komisija, potrjen, bi to na koncu lahko pripeljalo do tega, da sodnik ne bi mogel upo�tevati načela popolne od�kodnine.
52 that it is based on the same criterion as that used by the Court of First Instance.
52 temelji na istem merilu, kot ga je uporabilo Sodi�če prve stopnje.
The Commission departs therefrom, in the final analysis, only as regards determining the extent of the damage which, as has already been stated in this Opinion, is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the court hearing the substance of the case.
Od njega se Komisija navsezadnje oddalji samo pri določitvi obsega �kode, kar pa spada izključno v pristojnost sodnika, ki ugotavlja dejansko stanje, kot je že bilo navedeno v teh sklepnih predlogih.
In other words, since the Commission acknowledges the relevance of the criterion of earnings for the purposes of compensating for the loss of an opportunity to be recruited, including as the starting point for its own method of calculation, it cannot, in the context of the appeal, criticise the method and extent of compensation for the damage suffered.
Z drugimi besedami, ker Komisija priznava upo�tevnost merila plačila glede od�kodnine za izgubo možnosti zaposlitve, ki ga je uporabila kot izhodi�če za lastno metodo izračuna, ne more več v okviru pritožbe kritizirati načina in obsega povrnitve �kode.
Those considerations also lead me to dismiss the Commission’s claim concerning the unequal treatment which would be caused by the method used by the Court of First Instance.
Na podlagi tega razmisleka bi zavrnil tudi trditev Komisije o kr�itvi načela enakega obravnavanja, ki naj bi jo povzročila metoda, ki jo je uporabilo Sodi�če.
Indeed, not only are such criticisms concerned with the extent of the damage, they also disregard the necessary discretion which must be enjoyed by the court hearing the substance of the case when carrying out the most appropriate assessment of compensation for the damage suffered.
Poleg dejstva, da se take kritike nana�ajo na obseg �kode, tudi ne upo�tevajo nujno diskrecijske pravice, ki jo mora imeti sodnik pri določanju najustreznej�e od�kodnine za �kodo, ki jo je oseba utrpela.
Moreover, as the Commission has pointed out, the purpose of the method which it proposes is to compensate in a uniform way for the loss of an opportunity to be recruited.
Kot je med drugim že poudarila Komisija, sku�a metoda, ki jo predlaga, enotno določiti od�kodnino za izgubo možnosti zaposlitve.
However, on the one hand, that approach tends to disregard the necessarily individual nature of damage caused by an unlawful act committed by a Community institution and, on the other hand, it entails the risk of undermining the overall deterrent nature of financial compensation and encouraging the administration to strike a balance between complying with the rules applicable to it and engaging in unlawful conduct which it knows the price of in advance.
Ta pristop na eni strani zlahka ne upo�teva, da je �koda zaradi nezakonitosti, ki jo je storila institucija Skupnosti, nujno individualne narave, ter na drugi strani vsebuje tveganje, da bo denarna od�kodnina izgubila odvračalni učinek, ker bi tak pristop spodbujal upravo, da tehta med spo�tovanjem določb in nezakonitim ravnanjem, za katerega pa že vnaprej pozna stro�ke.
Finally, it is also necessary to dismiss the Commission’s complaints relating to the extent of the compensation as set out in the judgment under appeal, which it is appropriate, as stated in points 67 and 71 above, to interpret as relating to the absence and/or inadequacy of the statement of reasons, complaints which are concerned, in essence, with the period of 5 years taken into account in the judgment under appeal for the purposes of calculating the difference between the earnings expected by
Nazadnje je treba zavrniti očitke Komisije glede obsega od�kodnine, določenega v izpodbijani sodbi. Kot je to bilo pojasnjeno v točkah 67 in 71 teh sklepnih predlogov, je treba te očitke razlagati tako, da se nana�ajo na manjkajočo ali pomanjkljivo obrazložitev in zlasti na obdobje petih let, ki je
To require the court hearing the substance of the case to apply a uniform method, as the Commission suggests, would almost certainly prevent it from exercising a large part of the unlimited jurisdiction which allows it to rule ex aequo et bono by seeking
Če bi sodnik, ki ugotavlja dejansko stanje, moral uporabiti enotno metodo, kot to predlaga Komisija, bi mu to zagotovo v velikem delu onemogočilo izvajanje pristojnosti za odločanje v sporu polne juri-
Ms Girardot if her applications had been accepted and those which she actually received.
KOMISIJA PROTI GIRARDOT bilo upo�tevano v izpodbijani sodbi pri izra -čunu razlike med pričakovanim plačilom M.-C. Girardot, če bi bile njene prijave sprejete, in plačilom, ki ga je dejansko prejela.
Indeed, it is sufficient to note that, by determining, on the one hand, in paragraph 62 of the judgment under appeal, the starting point of the comparison period as being the date on which the appointment of the successful candidates took effect and, on the other hand, in paragraphs 63 to 78 of that judgment, the term of that period by taking into account all the facts and points of law which would have governed the relationship between the person concerned and the Commission if the latter had recruited her, the Court of First Instance adequately explained the reasons which led it to use that period.
Zadostuje ugotovitev, da je Sodi�če prve stopnje dovolj pojasnilo razloge za izbiro tega obdobja s tem, da je obrazložilo na eni strani v točki 62 izpodbijane sodbe začetno točko obdobja primerjave, ki jo je določilo na dan začetka veljavnosti imenovanj sprejetih kandidatov, in na drugi strani v točkah od 63 do 78 imenovane sodbe konec obdobja ter pri tem upo�tevalo vse dejanske in pravne elemente, ki bi vplivali na razmerje med M.-C. Girardot in Komisijo, če bi jo ta zaposlila.
In the light of all those considerations, I propose that the Court should dismiss the main appeal.
Zaradi vseh teh razlogov predlagam, da se pritožbo zavrne.
VII — The cross-appeal
VII – Nasprotna pritožba kariere na Komisiji.
According to Ms Girardot, the prospect of appointment as an established official after recruitment was not uncertain.
Kajti po mnenju M.-C. Girardot možnost imenovanja za uradnico po zaposlitvi ni bila negotova.
The period to take into account should therefore necessarily have been greater than the period of five years used by the Court of First Instance.
Obdobje, ki bi ga bilo treba upo�tevati, bi moralo biti dalj�e od petih let, ki jih je izbralo Sodi�če prve stopnje.
The second manifest error of assessment committed by the Court of First Instance relates to the determination of the difference in earnings.
Druga očitna napaka pri presoji, ki naj bi jo storilo Sodi�če prve stopnje, se nana�a na določitev razlike v plačilu.