natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Michel Barnier who, as the Commissioner for Regional Policy in 2000−04 was responsible for introducing Territorial Cohesion into the debate, identified several elements to it: equity concerns (i.e. where people live should not crucially determine their opportunities nor their quality of life); competitiveness (regions and localities each in their own way play a crucial role in growth and job creation); sustainability and good governance. ese represent different, and potentially contradictory, concerns that need to be specified, and hopefully reconciled, from case to case.
Michel Barnier, ki je bil kot komisar za regionalno politiko v obdobju 2000–2004 odgovoren za začetek razprave o teritorialni koheziji, je v zvezi z njo opredelil več elementov: vprašanje enakosti (priložnosti ali kakovost življenja ljudi ne bi smele biti bistveno odvisne od tega, kje ljudje živijo); konkurenčnost (regije in kraji vsak po svoje igrajo ključno vlogo pri rasti in ustvarjanju delovnih mest); trajnost in odgovorno vodenje. Ti elementi ustrezajo različnim in morda protislovnim zadevam, ki jih je treba vsako posebej opredeliti in po možnosti uskladiti.
Territorial Cohesion is thus an invitation to a dance, it is not the dance itself.
Teritorialna kohezija je torej vabilo na ples, ne pa sam ples.
At the moment, the articulation of territorial concerns and of territorial strategies is crucially shaped by an institutional setup that has evolved over centuries, with communes at the bottom of a pyramid, the nation state at the top and one or more layers in between. is is so well established that we can hardly think of ourselves and of our institutions and how to organise democratic legitimacy in any other terms.
Trenutno se teritorialna vprašanja in strategije oblikujejo znotraj institucionalne strukture, ki se je razvijala skozi stoletja in v kateri so skupnosti na dnu piramide, nacionalna država na vrhu, vmes pa je ena ali več plasti.
At the same time, reality is rapidly changing,
To je tako trdno zakoreninjeno, da si težko kakor koli drugače predstavljamo sebe, svoje institucije ali kako organizirati demokratično legitimnost.
Lambert van Nistelrooij, Member of the European Parliament, Rapporteur on the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion and the Fifth Cohesion Policy Progress Report
Lambert van Nistelrooij, poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, poročevalec o zeleni knjigi o teritorialni koheziji in petem poročilu o napredku na področju kohezijske politike
First and foremost, regions learn a lot from each other and they share experience in programmes like, Regions of Economic Change, Regions of Knowledge and the European Neighbourhood Programme Initiative.
Najpomembneje je, da se regije veliko naučijo druga od druge in si izmenjujejo izkušnje pri programih, kot so Regije za gospodarsko spremembo, Regije znanja in pobuda Evropski sosedski programi.
Europe has a strong tradition of interregional and crossborder co-operation.
Evropa ima močno tradicijo medregionalnega in čezmejnega sodelovanja.
Public and private investments, open coordination or innovative ecosystems are modern concepts that have to be strongly supported.
Javne in zasebne naložbe, odprto usklajevanje ali inovativni ekosistemi so sodobni koncepti, ki potrebujejo močno podporo.
Regions and cities are the territorial platform where policies get connected and gain added value.
Regije in mesta so ozemeljsko izhodišče, na katerem se politike povežejo in dobijo dodano vrednost.
I want to emphasise the need for ‘horizontal policies’ with an integrated approach, to make the governing of the territories more efficient.
Rad bi poudaril, da so za učinkovitejše upravljanje ozemelj potrebne „horizontalne politike“ s celostnim pristopom.
EU budgets and policies are complementary to each other on a given territory.
Proračuni in politike EU se na posameznem ozemlju dopolnjujejo.
I therefore support the Commission’s approach of ‘connection, cooperation and concentration’. is leads to a European-wide overview of the level of growth and wealth.
Zato podpiram pristop „povezovanje, sodelovanje in koncentracija“, za katerega se je odločila Komisija. Na podlagi tega se lahko izoblikuje pregled nad ravnjo rasti in bogastva v vsej Evropi.
If Member States and regional and local authorities choose, EU funds can support ‘development peaks’.
Če se države članice ter regionalne in lokalne oblasti odločijo za to, lahko skladi EU podprejo „razvojne vrhe“.
We see new entities of regional development, in crossborder and ‘meta-regions’ for instance, like in the Baltic Sea region.
Opažamo nove entitete regionalnega razvoja v čezmejnih in „metaregijah“, na primer v baltski regiji.
Besides these developments, Territorial Cohesion stresses support for sustainable growth and competition in all European regions. e future allocation of European funds will be influenced by our aim to work on a symmetric, multipolar and balanced Europe.
Poleg tega razvoja je pri teritorialni koheziji poudarjeno tudi podpiranje trajnostne rasti in konkurenčnosti v vseh evropskih regijah. Na razdeljevanje evropskih sredstev v prihodnosti bo vplival naš cilj, da si prizadevamo za skladno, večpolno in uravnoteženo Evropo.
In the 2007−13 period, objective three (co-operation) has been limited in financial terms.
V obdobju 2007–2013 je bil tretji cilj (sodelovanje) finančno omejen.
I propose to boost this objective. e leverage of interregional and crossborder cooperation is huge, and should be more profiled.
Predlagam spodbujanje tega cilja. Vpliv medregionalnega in čezmejnega sodelovanja je zelo velik, zato bi moral biti bolj izoblikovan.
10 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_
10 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_
How can the Parliament contribute to furthering the political debate on Territorial Cohesion, in light of the recent publication of the Green Paper?
Kako lahko Parlament prispeva k spodbujanju politične razprave o teritorialni koheziji ob nedavni objavi zelene knjige?
At this stage of the discussion on Territorial Cohesion, the Parliament will put forward new and challenging ideas to fuel the debate on the future of Cohesion Policy.
Na tej stopnji razprave o teritorialni koheziji bo Parlament predstavil nove in izzivalne zamisli, da bi spodbudil razpravo o prihodnosti kohezijske politike.
‘Territorial Cohesion’ should come in the mind of stakeholders as a horizontal concept aiming at defining the territorial impact of cohesion and sectoral policies on a given territory.
„Teritorialno kohezijo“ bi morale zainteresirane strani dojemati kot horizontalen koncept, namenjen opredeljevanju teritorialnega vpliva kohezije in sektorskih politik na posamezno ozemlje.
erefore, the European Parliament should be firm in demanding the publication of a White Paper on Territorial Cohesion, following the end of the Commission's consultation process.
Zato mora Evropski parlament vztrajati pri zahtevi po objavi bele knjige o teritorialni koheziji, ko bo Komisija končala posvetovalni postopek.
Only this will pave the way for translating ‘Territorial Cohesion’ into concrete provisions, which should be introduced in the next legislative package on Structural Funds for the post-2013 programming period.
Samo tako se bo „teritorialna kohezija“ lahko prenesla v konkretne predpise, ki bi jih bilo treba vključiti v naslednji zakonodajni paket o strukturnih skladih za programsko obdobje po letu 2013.
I believe that the European Parliament will safeguard the territorial dimension of our policies in a stronger way than we did before. is will be an approach for the whole European area, not only for the poorer regions!
Prepričan sem, da bo Evropski parlament zaščitil teritorialno razsežnost naših politik bolj kot v preteklosti. To bo pristop za celoten evropski prostor, ne samo za revnejše regije!
Innovation ecosystems, competitivity is helped along by cooperation and people exchange best practice.
Inovativni ekosistemi – sodelovanje in izmenjava najboljših praks prispevata h konkurenčnosti.
Jesús Bedoya Vega, Deputy Director - General of Economy in the Cantabrian Regional Ministry of Economy and Finance
Jesús Bedoya Vega, namestnik generalnega direktorja za gospodarstvo na kantabrijskem regionalnem ministrstvu za gospodarstvo in finance
e Green Paper is a highly interesting document that provides food for thought and opens up debate on concepts associated with Territorial Cohesion.
Zelena knjiga je zelo zanimiv dokument, ki spodbuja razmislek in sproža razpravo o konceptih, povezanih s teritorialno kohezijo.
However, in practice, the progress of this debate is impaired by its lack of concrete ideas and solutions regarding financial aspects, these being fundamental when trying to implement the ideas the document contains.
Vendar pa v praksi napredek te razprave ovira pomanjkanje konkretnih zamisli in rešitev glede finančnih vidikov, saj so ti bistveni za uresničevanje zamisli iz tega dokumenta.
As a starting point, it is essential to define and delimit the nature and characteristics of every type of co-operation. e challenges, problems and solutions regarding crossborder cooperation are not the same as those faced by transnational or interregional co-operation.
Pomembno je, da se najprej opredelijo in določijo narava in značilnosti vseh vrst sodelovanja. Izzivi, težave in rešitve, povezani s čezmejnim sodelovanjem, niso enaki izzivom transnacionalnega ali medregionalnega sodelovanja.
Traditionally, the culture of cooperation has taken root in the regions’ neighbouring borders, and as a result transnational cooperation agents’ engagement will only increase if existing cooperation areas are successfully reinforced and consolidated.
Kultura sodelovanja je tradicionalno ukoreninjena na mejah sosednjih regij, in zato se bo zavzemanje subjektov za transnacionalno sodelovanje povečalo le, če se bodo uspešno okrepila in utrdila uveljavljena področja sodelovanja.
What is your assessment on transnational cooperation in the south-west Europe area, in which your region acts as Managing Authority?
Kako ocenjujete transnacionalno sodelovanje v jugozahodni Evropi, v kateri vaša regija deluje kot organ upravljanja?
My assessment is very positive; a lot of progress has been made in recent years. is progress has allowed more than five hundred organisations of south-west Europe to set in
Ta napredek je omogočil, da je več kot 500 organizacij iz jugozahodne Evrope organiziralo skupne projekte sodelovanja, čeprav pred tem niso imele izkušenj s sodelovanjem. To je dejanski uspeh sodelovanja.
Health care, one of the areas which lends itself to crossborder co-operation.
Zdravstvo, eno od področij, ki mu lahko koristi čezmejno sodelovanje.
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_ p. 11 _BAR_
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_ str. 11 _BAR_
The European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) - furthering the aims of the Green Paper
Evropsko združenje za teritorialno sodelovanje (EZTS) – podpiranje ciljev zelene knjige
It is a European model for sustainable growth and jobs” explained Danuta Hübner, Regional Policy Commissioner, launching the debate on the future of Cohesion Policy.
Je evropski model za trajnostno rast in zaposlovanje,“ je povedala Danuta Hübner, komisarska za regionalno politiko, ob začetku razprave o prihodnosti kohezijske politike.
What is to be gained by forming an EGTC?
Kakšne so koristi oblikovanja EZTS?
e approach to Cohesion Policy is becoming more decentralised: 2007−13 programmes hope to bring in public organisations at sub-regional level so boosting multilevel governance.
Pristop h kohezijski politiki postaja bolj decentraliziran: cilj programov za obdobje 2007–2013 je vključiti javne organizacije na subregionalni ravni in tako spodbuditi upravljanje na več ravneh.
By combining and forming a legal personality, organisations will have a clearer voice − it offers them an additional way to take part in the implementation of programmes on an equal footing with regional or national governments.
Organizacije bodo z združevanjem in vzpostavitvijo pravne osebe jasneje nastopale – ponuja se jim dodatna možnost za sodelovanje pri izvajanju programov v enakopravnem položaju z regionalnimi ali nacionalnimi vladami.
EGTC – Reducing the complexity of crossborder co-operation.
EZTS – odpravljanje ovir za čezmejno sodelovanje.
Transnational cooperation between regions is very much alive between Galicia, Spain, and the north of Portugal, as the Eixo Atlántico testifies.
Zelena knjiga o teritorialni koheziji govori o skladnem razvoju po vsej EU in zagotavljanju, da lahko ljudje čim bolj izkoristijo dane značilnosti regij, v katerih živijo.
e Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion talks of harmonious development across the EU and ensuring that people are able to make the most of the inherent features of the regions in which they live.
Zagovarja trditev, da je konkurenčnost odvisna od povezovanja z drugimi ozemlji za usklajeno in trajnostno izkoriščanje skupnih sredstev – vendar se lahko razmere zapletejo, če naj bi si ta skupna sredstva delile različne regije ali bi se delila prek meja držav članic.
Competitiveness, it argues, depends on building links with other territories to use common assets in a coordinated and sustainable way – but should those common assets be shared over different regions, or across the borders of Member States, the situation can become complex.
Da bi olajšala pot do teritorialnega sodelovanja, je Komisija uvedla EZTS, katere cilj je poenostaviti upravljanje in finančno nadzorovanje teritorialnega sodelovanja v Evropi.
To smooth the path to closer territorial cooperation the Commission has established the EGTC, which sets out to simplify the administration and financial control of territorial cooperation in Europe.
Sodelovanje med Galicijo (Španija) in severom Portugalske je transnacionalno sodelovanje med regijami, kot potrjuje združenje Eixo Atlántico.
e EGTC concept was set out in a 2006 regulation as a reaction to the pressure brought forward by crossborder Euroregions and similar organisations who called for a legal foundation for their co-operation.
Koncept EZTS je bil opredeljen z uredbo iz leta 2006 kot odgovor na pritiske čezmejnih evroregij in podobnih organizacij, ki so zahtevale pravno podlago za svoje sodelovanje.
Bodies from at least two Member States have to be involved in an EGTC – members from outside the EU are potentially possible as well. ose involved can be at any level of government, regional or local authorities, associations or any other public body.
V EZTS morajo sodelovati subjekti iz vsaj dveh držav članic – sodelujejo pa lahko tudi člani iz držav zunaj EU. Vključeni so lahko subjekti s katere koli ravni oblasti, regionalne ali lokalne oblasti, združenja ali druge javne organizacije.
e establishment of an EGTC should be targeted at one of the following main types of activity: it can deal with the implementation of European territorial cooperation programmes or projects; it can cover the implementation of other territorial cooperation actions co-financed by the Eu; or, finally, it can also carry out other activities that are not linked to EU funded projects.
Čeprav je bila ta pot včasih težavna – ker pred EZTS ni bilo čezmejnega pravnega okvira, se je drugim upravnim ravnem zdelo, da združenje vdira na njihovo področje dejavnosti – je regionalno združenje uspešno. 15 let po ustanovitvi deluje znotraj proračuna, pripravlja se na oblikovanje EZTS, uresničuje strategije, kot je lokalna digitalna agenda i2020 za spodbujanje novih tehnologij, ima pa tudi službo za študijske zadeve, ki omogoča povezovanje raziskovalcev v mreže.
12 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_
12 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_
Territorial Cohesion – we think we want it, but we’re not sure what it is
Teritorialna kohezija – zdi se nam, da si jo želimo, vendar nismo prepričani, kaj pomeni
Are cooperation and competition mutually exclusive?
Ali se sodelovanje in konkurenčnost medsebojno izključujeta?
Should Cohesion Funding go to supporting territories that are lagging behind in terms of GDP or should they go to furthering poles of excellence?
Bi bilo treba kohezijska sredstva nameniti podpiranju ozemelj, ki zaostajajo glede na BDP, ali spodbujanju središč odličnosti?
Just how useful is GDP as an indicator?
Kako uporaben kazalnik je BDP?
Just some of the questions being asked at the conference on Territorial Cohesion and the Future of the Cohesion Policy.
To je samo nekaj vprašanj, zastavljenih na konferenci o teritorialni koheziji in prihodnosti kohezijske politike.
Held in Paris, from 30 to 31 October, the event attracted over a thousand delegates from a variety of Member States and speakers from the fields of policymaking, academia and science.
Potekala je v Parizu 30. in 31. oktobra, privabila pa je več kot tisoč odposlancev iz številnih držav članic in govornikov s političnega, akademskega in znanstvenega področja.
Panorama attended the conference and reports back from Paris on the topics for debate, the concurrent workshops and the round-table summing up.
Panorama se je udeležila konference in pripravila poročilo iz Pariza o temah razprave, delavnicah, ki so potekale ob konferenci, in sklepni okrogli mizi.
As speakers agreed, the concept of Territorial Cohesion is not easy to grasp, which makes the debate all the more necessary. ere is a pressing need for consensus on what the idea represents and how to go about making the notion work in concrete, practical terms, given the place the term holds in the Lisbon Treaty.
Govorniki so se strinjali, da koncept teritorialne kohezije ni preprost, zaradi česar je razprava še pomembnejša. Čedalje bolj je potrebno soglasje, kaj ta zamisel sploh pomeni in kako se lotiti njenega udejanjanja v praksi, glede na to, kako pomemben je ta izraz v Lizbonski pogodbi.
Although unratified at the moment, speakers were unanimous in their hopes that the Treaty will be signed, which would make it necessary to establish a definition and long-term vision for the notion of Territorial Cohesion.
Čeprav ta pogodba še ni ratificirana, so vsi govorniki izrazili upanje, da bo podpisana, zaradi česar pa bi bilo treba oblikovati opredelitev in dolgoročno vizijo pojma teritorialna kohezija.
Launching the conference, Hubert Falco, the French Secretary of State for Spatial Planning, underlined the need for a wider debate, including those actively involved and any members of the public who feel they have something to say. “is conference is an indication of our willingness to engage in dialogue from local to European level, and I will take along the synthesis of the exchanges today and tomorrow to the meeting of ministers in Marseille from 25 to 26 November,” he explained, as he opened the event.
Hubert Falco, francoski državni sekretar za prostorsko načrtovanje, je ob odprtju konference poudaril, da je potrebna širša razprava, pri kateri naj sodelujejo vsi, ki so dejavno vključeni v delo, in vsi posamezniki, ki bi radi izrazili svoje mnenje. „Ta konferenca je dokaz naše pripravljenosti za dialog na vseh ravneh od lokalne do evropske, povzetek današnje in jutrišnje izmenjave mnenj pa bom predstavil na srečanju ministrov 25. in 26. novembra v Marseillu,“ je pojasnil, ko je odprl konferenco.
Public consultation will run until the end of February.
Javno posvetovanje bo trajalo do konca februarja 2009.
e last day started with a summing up of the conclusions gathered from the various workshops and offered speakers the chance to answer questions from the floor.
Zadnji dan se je začel s povzemanjem ugotovitev z različnih delavnic, govorniki pa so dobili priložnost, da odgovarjajo na vprašanja iz dvorane.
A final round table focused specifically on the future of Cohesion Policy with thoughts from Commissioner for Regional Affairs, Danuta Hübner, Pierre Dartout (Interministerial Delegate for Spatial Planning and Competitiveness of Territories, France), and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Deputy Director for Public Governance and Territorial Development, Mario Pezzini, amongst others.
Sklepna okrogla miza je bila posvečena predvsem prihodnosti kohezijske politike, na njej pa so svoje mnenje med drugim predstavili komisarka za regionalno politiko Danuta Hübner, Pierre Dartout (medresorski delegat za prostorsko načrtovanje in konkurenčnost ozemelj, Francija) in Mario Pezzini, namestnik direktorja za javno upravo in teritorialni razvoj Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD).
Launching the debate, ‘opening Pandora’s box’ e effect of globalisation on what we can now recognise as fragile financial markets, climate change, demographic trends − all underline the need for adaptation to the situation unfolding in each of the regions around the EU.
Vpliv globalizacije na finančne trge, za katere zdaj lahko priznamo, da so občutljivi, podnebne spremembe, demografska gibanja – vse to poudarja potrebo po prilagajanju nastajajočim razmeram v vseh regijah po EU.
Gathering in the main conference hall, delegates heard a fairly unanimous assessment of what should be avoided, what Territorial Cohesion should not be: the funds are not to be considered as compensation, repairing the damage done by badly thought through sectoral policies, “Every stage of sectoral policymaking must take the territory into account or we will be wasting our time,” said Michel Delebarre, Vice-President of the Committee of the Regions.
Odposlanci, ki so se zbrali v glavni konferenčni dvorani, so slišali precej enotno oceno, čemu se je treba izogniti, kaj teritorialna kohezija ne bi smela biti: skladov ne bi smeli obravnavati kot nadomestilo za odpravo škode, ki so jo povzročile nepremišljene sektorske politike.
He described the committee as adamant that Territorial Cohesion must not be a tool kit, repairing the damage caused by problems arising from the implementation of other policies.
„Ozemlje je treba upoštevati na vseh stopnjah oblikovanja sektorskih politik, če nočemo zapravljati časa,“ je dejal Michel Delebarre, podpredsednik Odbora regij.
Speakers had various ideas on what cohesion should be and how to achieve its goals, but all agreed the debate was a crucial, if complex one, which needed to answer questions such as: Territorial Cohesion, yes or no?
Mnenja govornikov o tem, kaj naj bi bila kohezija in kako doseči njene cilje, so se razlikovala, vsi pa so se strinjali, da je razprava pri tem bistvena, čeprav zapletena, in da je treba poiskati odgovore na vprašanja, kot so: Teritorialna kohezija, da ali ne?
To finance what and for whom?
Kaj financirati in za koga?
Integrated or sectoral policies?
Povezovalne ali sektorske politike?
What is the role of multilevel governance?
Kakšna je vloga upravljanja na več ravneh?
Where does Territorial Cohesion fit into other policies?
Kako se teritorialna kohezija vključuje v druge politike?
Likening the launch of such a debate to the opening of Pandora’s box, Jan Olbrycht, member of the REGI Commission of the European Parliament, made it clear that however contentious, the subject needed to be aired and clarified. “e debate was good for state building and is a learning process for good governance in the newer Member States,” he said.
Jan Olbrycht, član odbora REGI Evropskega parlamenta, je sprožitev te razprave primerjal z odpiranjem Pandorine skrinjice in zatrdil, da je treba to temo kljub njeni spornosti načeti in razjasniti. „Razprava je koristila državotvornosti in je učni proces dobrega upravljanja v novih državah članicah,“ je še dodal.
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_ p. 13 _BAR_
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_ str. 13 _BAR_
A sample of the points discussed:
Primer dveh obravnavanih tem:
• The CAP has an undeniable territorial dimension, particularly when one considers the Less Favoured Areas status, agro-environmental measures, Leader and various types of production be strongly linked to geography.
•skupnakmetijskapolitika(SKP)imanespornoteritorialnorazsežnost, zlasti če upoštevamo status območij z omejenimi možnostmi, kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe, pobudo LEADER in to, da so različne vrste proizvodnje močno povezane z geografskimi značilnostmi.
Arising questions:
Vprašanja: Ali bi bilo treba glede na to okrepiti teritorialno razsežnost SKP?