natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
EC, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which prohibits advertising on national television networks for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature carried out in private health care establishments while at the same time permitting such advertising, subject to certain conditions, on local television networks.
Sodi�ču se ni treba izreči o uporabljivosti nacionalnih določb za namene re�itve spora, temveč mora v okviru delitve pristojnosti med sodi�či Skupnosti in nacionalnimi sodi�či upo�tevati uredbeni kontekst, iz katerega izhaja vpra�anje za predhodno odločanje, kot ga opredeljuje predložitveno sodi�če.
It is not for the Court of Justice to rule on the applicability of provisions of national law which are relevant to the outcome of proceedings, but the Court must take account, under the division of jurisdiction between the Community Courts and the national courts, of the legislative context, as described in the order for reference, in which the question put to it is set.
tako, da nasprotujeta zakonodaji, ki prepoveduje ogla�evanje zdravljenja in kirur�kih posegov na področju lepotnih posegov, ki se opravljajo v zasebnih zdravstvenih ustanovah, na nacionalnih televizijskih postajah, pod določenimi pogoji pa dovoljuje tako ogla�evanje na lokalnih televizijskih postajah.
Such rules on advertising entail a prohibition which goes beyond that laid down in Article 14(1) of Directive 89/552 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities.
Taka ureditev ogla�evanja namreč vsebuje prepoved, ki presega prepoved, ki je določena v členu 14(1) Direktive 89/552 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti raz�irjanja televizijskih programov.
Although, pursuant to Article 3(1) of that directive, the Member States remain free to lay down more detailed or stricter rules in the areas covered by the directive, when exercising that right, they must respect the basic freedoms guaranteed by the EC Treaty.
Čeprav člen 3(1) te direktive državam članicam daje možnost, da določijo natančnej�a in strožja pravila na področju, ki ga pokriva, je tako pristojnost treba izvajati ob spo�tovanju temeljnih svobo�čin, ki jih jamči Pogodba ES.
Moreover, a presumption of relevance attaches to questions referred by the national courts for a preliminary ruling, which can be rebutted only in exceptional cases, in particular where it is quite obvious that the interpretation sought of the provisions of Community law referred to in those questions bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or to its purpose.
Poleg tega je mogoče domnevo upo�tevnosti, povezano z vpra�anji za predhodno odločanje, ki jih postavijo nacionalna sodi�ča, zavrniti samo v izjemnih primerih, ko je popolnoma očitno, da razlaga določb prava Skupnosti, za katero je s temi vpra�anji zapro�eno, ni v nobeni zvezi z resničnostjo oziroma predmetom spora o glavni stvari.
That is the case as regards questions in respect of which the referring court fails to state the connection between the aspects of national law and the provisions of Community law which it asks the Court to interpret and fails to explain in what way the Court’s examination of a code of conduct for medical practitioners concerning the practice adopted in interpreting the laws on advertisements for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature would be of assistance in resolving the dispute in the main proceedings.
To velja za vpra�anja, glede katerih predložitveno sodi�če ne navaja, kaj naj bi bila zveza med elementi nacionalnega prava in določbami prava Skupnosti, za razlago katerih prosi, in ne razloži, zakaj naj bi bil preizkus etičnega kodeksa zdravnikov v povezavi z razlagalno prakso na področju ogla�evanja zdravstveno-kirur-�kih storitev v zvezi z lepotnimi posegi s strani Sodi�ča koristen za re�itev spora o glavni stvari.
(see paras 20, 23, 26)
(Glej točke 20, 23 in 26.)
Articles 43 EC and 49 EC, read in conjunction with Articles 48 EC and 55
Člena 43 ES in 49 ES v povezavi s členoma 48 ES in 55 ES je treba razlagati
Such rules on advertising are liable to impede or render less attractive the exercise of the basic freedoms guaranteed by Articles 43 EC and 49 EC.
Taka ureditev ogla�evanja lahko prepoveduje, moti ali zmanj�uje privlačnost izvr�evanja temeljnih svobo�čin, ki jih zagotavljata člena 43 ES in 49 ES.
Thus, for companies established in Member States other than the Member State in question, such a prohibition is a serious obstacle to the pursuit of their activities by means of a subsidiary established in that Member State and is, therefore, liable to make it more difficult for such economic operators to gain access to the market of that
Tako lahko za družbe, ustanovljene v drugih državah članicah kot je zadevna, taka prepoved pomeni resno oviro za izvajanje njihovih dejavnosti s strani hčerinske družbe v slednji državi članici in lahko tako tem gospodarskim subjektom otežuje dostop do trga navedene države članice. Poleg tega ta ureditev ogla�evanja pomeni omejitev
Member State. Moreover, such rules on advertising constitute a restriction on the freedom to provide services in that they prevent companies in other Member States from using services for broadcasting television advertisements.
zdravja, pa ureditev, ki prepoveduje tako ogla�evanje na nacionalnih televizijskih postajah, ob določenih pogojih pa dovoljuje ogla�evanje na lokalnih televizijskih postajah, pomeni neskladnost in torej ne služi zgoraj navedenemu cilju, ki ga zasleduje.
of protection of public health, rules which prohibit the broadcasting of such advertisements on national television networks, while at the same time permitting them, subject to certain conditions, on local television networks, are inconsistent and cannot therefore properly attain the public health objective which they seek to pursue.
Čeprav je ureditev televizijskega ogla�evanja storitev zdravljenja in kirur�kih posegov, ki se opravljajo v zasebnih zdravstvenih ustanovah, načeloma lahko upravičena zaradi cilja varovanja javnega
(see paras 31-33, 37-39, operative part)
(Glej točke od 31 do 33, od 37 do 39 in izrek.)
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERALBOT delivered on 31 January 2008 1
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI GENERALNEGA PRAVOBRANILCAYVESA BOTA, predstavljeni 31. januarja 2008 1
In this Opinion, I shall state that that prohibition of such advertisements on national television networks constitutes a restriction on freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services.
V teh sklepnih predlogih bom prikazal, da prepoved takega ogla�evanja na postajah nacionalne televizije pomeni omejitev svobode ustanavljanja in svobodnega opravljanja storitev.
The present reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the provisions of Italian legislation on advertisements for the medical professions and private clinics.
Ta postopek za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na določbe italijanske zakonodaje v zvezi z ogla�evanjem zdravstvenih poklicev in zasebnih klinik.
According to those provisions, the broadcasting of advertisements for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature carried out in private health care establishments is prohibited on national television networks.
V skladu s temi določbami je prepovedano ogla�evanje zdravljenja in kirur�kih posegov na področju lepotnih posegov, opravljenih v zasebnih zdravstvenih ustanovah, na postajah nacionalne televizije.
However, such advertising is permitted on local television networks and through other media on condition, first, that authorisation is obtained from the competent local authority, the conditions to be fulfilled to obtain that authorisation not being specified, and, second, that the expenditure on such advertising does not exceed 5% of declared income for the previous year.
Vendar pa je ogla�evanje na postajah lokalne televizije in prek drugih sredstev obve�čanja dovoljeno, prvič, če se pridobi dovoljenje pristojnega lokalnega organa, ne da bi bili pogoji, ki jih je treba izpolniti za to dovoljenje, določeni, in drugič, če izdatek za to ogla�evanje ne presega 5 % dohodkov, izkazanih v prej�njem letu.
The national court wishes to know whether the prohibition on broadcasting advertisements for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature carried out in private health care establishments on national television networks laid down in that legislation is compatible with Community law, notwithstanding the fact that such advertisements are permitted under certain conditions on local television networks.
Predložitveno sodi�če želi vedeti, ali je prepoved ogla�evanja zdravljenja in kirur�kih posegov na področju lepotnih posegov, opravljenih v zasebnih zdravstvenih ustanovah, na postajah nacionalne televizije, ki jo določa ta zakonodaja, združljiva s pravom Skupnosti, če je ogla�evanje pod določenimi pogoji dovoljeno na postajah lokalne televizije.
I shall also state that, while a Member State may properly impose restrictions on the exercise of those freedoms in order to protect a legitimate interest such as public health, the measure in question must, none the less, be appropriate for the purpose of achieving that objective and must not go beyond what is necessary for that purpose.
Prikazal bom tudi, da čeprav država članica lahko veljavno predpi�e omejitve za izvajanje teh svobo�čin s ciljem za�čititi legitimni interes, kot je javno zdravje, pa mora biti zadevni ukrep primeren za dosego tega cilja in ne sme presegati tega, kar je nujno potrebno za to.
I will state that, since the broadcasting of advertisements for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature carried out in private health care establishments is permitted, under certain conditions, on local television networks, the prohibition of such advertisements on national television networks does not satisfy the requirement of proportionality and is thus incompatible with Community law.
Pokazal bom, da brž ko je ogla�evanje zdravljenja in kirur�kih posegov na področju lepotnih posegov, opravljenih v zasebnih zdravstvenih ustanovah, pod določenimi pogoji odobreno na postajah lokalne televizije, prepoved enakega ogla�evanja na postajah nacionalne televizije ni v skladu z zahtevo po sorazmernosti in torej ni združljiva s pravom Skupnosti.
I — Legal framework the Community are also to enjoy the rights conferred by Articles 43 EC and 49 EC.
I – Pravni okvir statutarni sedež, glavno upravo ali glavni kraj poslovanja v Skupnosti.
According to Article 47(3) EC and pursuant to Article 55 EC, the abolition of restrictions which infringe Articles 43 EC and 49 EC in the case of the medical and allied and pharmaceutical professions is dependent upon coordination of the conditions for their exercise.
V skladu s členom 47(3) ES in na podlagi člena 55 ES je pri zdravstvenih delavcih, zdravstvenih sodelavcih in farmacevtih postopno odpravljanje omejitev odvisno od uskladitve pogojev za njihovo opravljanje v posameznih državah članicah.
However, the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities have acknowledged that the direct effect of Articles 43 EC and 49 EC, recognised in the Reyners 2and Van Binsbergen 3judgments respectively, with effect from 1 January 1970, the end of the transitional period, also applied to health care professions.
Vendar sta Svet Evropske unije in Komisija Evropskih skupnosti sprejela, da neposredni učinek členov 43 ES in 49 ES, ki je bil priznan v sodbah Reyners 2 in Van Binsbergen 3 od 1. januarja 1970, konec prehodnega obdobja, velja tudi za zdravstvene delavce.
4Moreover, medical and allied and pharmaceutical professions have been the subject of co-ordinating directives. 5
4Poleg tega so bile dejav- nosti zdravstvenih delavcev, zdravstvenih sodelavcev in farmacevtov predmet direktiv o usklajevanju. 5
The first paragraph of Article 43 EC prohibits restrictions on the freedom of establishment of nationals of a Member State in the territory of another Member State.
Člen 43, prvi odstavek, ES prepoveduje omejitve glede pravice do ustanavljanja za državljane ene države članice na ozemlju druge države članice.
According to the second paragraph of Article 43 EC, freedom of establishment includes the right to take up and pursue activities as selfemployed persons and to set up and manage undertakings.
V skladu s členom 43, drugi odstavek, ES pravica do ustanavljanja zajema pravico začeti in opravljati dejavnost kot samozaposlena oseba ter pravico do ustanovitve in vodenja podjetij.
According to Article 46(1) EC and Article 55 EC, Articles 43 EC and 49 EC do not prohibit restrictions justified on public health grounds.
V skladu s členoma 46, prvi odstavek, ES in 55 ES člena 43 ES in 49 ES ne ovirata omejitev, utemeljenih z razlogi javnega zdravja.
2 — Case 2/74 [1974] ECR 631.3 — Case 33/74 [1974] ECR 1299.
631).3 – Sodba z dne 3. decembra 1974 (33/74, Recueil, str. 1299).
4 — Thus, the first recital in the preamble to Council Direct- ive 75/362/EEC of 16 June 1975 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in medicine, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services (OJ 1975 L 167, p.
4 – Tako je v prvi uvodni izjavi Direktive Sveta 75/362/EGS z dne 16. junija 1975 o vzajemnem priznavanju diplom, spričeval in drugih dokazil o formalni izobrazbi s področja medicine, vključno z ukrepi za učinkovito uresničevanje pravice do ustanavljanja podjetij in svobode opravljanja storitev (UL L 167, str.
1) states that, pursuant to the Treaty, all discriminatory treatment based on nationality with regard to establishment and provision of services is prohibited as from the end of the transitional period.
1), navedeno, da je v skladu s Pogodbo po končanem prehodnem obdobju prepovedano vsako diskriminatorno obravnavanje na podlagi državljanstva glede opravljanja dejavnosti in opravljanja storitev.
5 — See, with regard to the activities of doctors, Directive 75/362 and Council Directive 75/363/EEC of 16 June 1975 concerning the coordination of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in respect of activities of doctors (OJ 1975 L 167, p. 14).
5 – Glej v zvezi z dejavnostjo zdravnikov direktivi Sveta 75/362 in 75/363/EGS z dne 16. junija 1975 o usklajevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov o dejavnostih zdravnikov (UL L 167, str. 14).
The directives adopted in these areas were repealed and replaced by Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22).
Direktivi, sprejeti na tem področju, sta bili razveljavljeni, nadomestila pa ju je Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/36/ES z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij (UL L 255, str. 22).
Pursuant to Articles 48 EC and 55 EC, companies or firms formed in accordance with the law of a Member State and having their registered office, central administration or principal place of business within
Na podlagi členov 48 ES in 55 ES uživajo pravice, ki jih uvajata člena 43 ES in 49 ES, tudi družbe, ustanovljene v skladu z zakonodajo posamezne države članice, ki imajo
Secondary legislation products and medical treatment available only on prescription in the Member State within whose jurisdiction the broadcaster falls shall be prohibited’.
Sekundarna zakonodaja zdravljenja, ki jih je mogoče dobiti le na recept v tisti državi članici, pod katere jurisdikcijo je izdajatelj televizijskega programa, […] prepovedano“.
Article 14(2) provides that teleshopping for, inter alia, medicinal products is to be prohibited.
V skladu z odstavkom 2 istega člena je televizijska prodaja, med drugim, storitev zdravljenja prepovedana.
In Directive 89/552/EEC, 6the Community legislature coordinated the national legislation governing television advertising.
Zakonodajalec Skupnosti je v okviru Direktive 89/552/EGS 6uskladil nacionalne zakonodaje, ki urejajo televizijsko ogla�evanje.
By virtue of Article 3(1) of the directive, Member States remain free to require television broadcasters under their jurisdiction to comply with more detailed or stricter rules in the areas covered by the directive.
Na podlagi člena 3(1) iste direktive lahko države članice od izdajateljev televizijskih programov pod njihovo sodno pristojnostjo zahtevajo, da na področjih, ki jih ureja ta direktiva, izpolnjujejo natančnej�a in strožja pravila.
‘Television advertising’ is defined in Article 1(c) of Directive 89/552 as ‘any form of announcement broadcast whether in return for payment or for similar consideration or broadcast for self-promotional purposes by a public or private undertaking in connection with a trade, business, craft or profession in order to promote the supply of goods or services, including immovable property, rights and obligations, in return for payment’.
Pojem „televizijsko ogla�evanje“ v skladu s členom 1(c) Direktive 89/552 „pomeni vsako obliko obvestila, ki ga javno ali zasebno podjetje oddaja bodisi za plačilo ali podobno nadomestilo bodisi v samopromocijske namene in ki zadeva trgovino, poslovno dejavnost, obrt ali stroko; ta oblika obvestila je namenjena spodbujanju preskrbe z blagom in storitvami, vključno z nepremičninami ali pravicami in obveznostmi, za plačilo“.
According to Article 12(d) of the direct- ive, television advertising and teleshopping are not to encourage behaviour prejudicial to health or safety.
V skladu s členom 12(d) te direktive televizijsko ogla�evanje in televizijska prodaja ne smeta spodbujati vedenja, �kodljivega zdravju in varnosti.
Advertising concerning the medical professions and private clinics is governed in Italy by Law No 175 of 5 February 1992, 7
V Italiji je ogla�evanje zdravstvenih poklicev in zasebnih klinik urejeno z zakonom �t. 175 z dne 5. februarja 1992 7, kot je bil spremenjen z zakonom �t.
6 — Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 1989 L 298, p.
6 – Direktiva Sveta z dne 3. oktobra 1989 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti raz�irjanja televizijskih programov (UL L 298, str.
60), (‘Directive 89/552’).
60, v nadaljevanju: Direktiva 89/552).
3.10 — Ordinary Supplement to GURI No 82 of 5 May 2004.
3.10 – Redni dodatek h GURI �t. 82, 5.5.2004.
The relevant provisions of the 1992 Law for the purpose of the present proceedings are as follows:
Določbe zakona iz leta 1992, ki so upo�tevane za ta postopek, so: c) častna odlikovanja, ki jih je podelila ali priznala država.
The use of the title of specialist shall be permitted only for persons who have obtained the relevant diploma in accordance with the rules in force.
Uporaba statusa specialista je dovoljena samo tistim osebam, ki so pridobile ustrezno diplomo v skladu z veljavnimi določbami.
Qualifications obtained abroad, including specialist qualifications, may be used only if they are recognised by the State.
Prepovedano je uporabljati nazive, vključno z nazivi specializacije, pridobljene v tujini, če jih država ni priznala.
Advertising relating to the exercise of the medical professions auxiliary medical professions provided for and regulated by the legis -lation in force shall be permitted only by means of notices affixed to the building in which the professional activity is carried out, advertisements placed in telephone dir -ectories, in general professional directories, in periodicals intended exclusively for medical practitioners, in daily newspapers and journals in the relevant fields and on local radio and television stations.
Ogla�evanje, ki se nana�a na opravljanje zdravstvenih poklicev in pomožnih zdravstvenih poklicev, predvidenih in urejenih z veljavno zakonodajo, je dovoljeno samo v obliki tabel, pritrjenih na zgradbi, v kateri se opravlja poklicna dejavnost, ter z oglasi, objavljenimi v telefonskih imenikih, v splo�nih poslovnih telefonskih imenikih, v strokovnih revijah, ki so izključno namenjene osebam, ki opravljajo zdravstveni poklic, v dnevnih časopisih in informativnih revijah ter na lokalnih radijskih in televizijskih postajah.
The notices and advertisements referred to in Article 1(1) may contain only the following information:
Table in oglasi, predvideni v odstavku 1, lahko vsebujejo samo naslednje označbe:
A non-specialist doctor may refer to a particular area in which he specialises by the use of words which reflect the official definition of the specialisation and are not misleading or ambiguous as to whether the doctor holds the specialist qualification …
Zdravnik, ki ni specialist, lahko omeni posebno področje, na katerem je dejaven, tako da uporabi izraze, ki povzemajo uradno poimenovanje specialista, ki niso zavajajoči ali ki niso dvoumni glede imetni�tva naziva specializacije […] a) priimek, ime, naslov, telefonsko �tevilko in morebitni naslov ordinacije, ordinacijski čas ali od kdaj do kdaj je ordinacija odprta za javnost;
(b) qualifications, academic qualifications, specialist and vocational qualifications,
b) kvalifikacije, akademske nazive, nazive specializacije in kariere brez okraj�av, ki bi lahko zavajale;
The authorisations provided for in Article 2(1) must be renewed only if modifications are made to the original text of the advertisement.
Dovoljenja iz odstavka 1 se obnovijo samo, če je izvirno besedilo oglasa spremenjeno.
Advertising in the form of notices and advertisements referred to in Article 1 must be authorised by the Mayor, with the approval of the professional body of which the applicant is a member. …
Ogla�evanje v obliki table in oglasa iz člena 1 mora dovoliti župan; dovoljenje izda na podlagi odobritve zbornice, katere član je prosilec. […]
In order to obtain municipal authorisation, the person concerned must make an application to the competent professional association or organisation, providing a detailed description of the type, characteristics and contents of the advertisement.
Da bi občina izdala dovoljenje, mora strokovnjak na pristojno zbornico ali poklicno združenje nasloviti pro�njo, ki ji je priložen podroben opis vrste, značilnosti in vsebine oglasa.
The professional association or organisation shall forward the application to the Mayor, together with its approval, within 30 days of the date on which it was submitted.
Zbornica ali poklicno združenje posreduje pro�njo županu, pri čemer priloži svoje soglasje, v roku tridesetih dni od datuma, ko ji je bila pro�nja predložena.
Advertising relating to private health care establishments and to surgeries and outpatient centres specialising in one or more areas of health care which are subject to statutory authorisation shall be permitted only by means of notices or signs affixed to the building in which the professional activity is carried out, advertisements placed in telephone directories, in general professional directories, in periodicals intended exclusively for medical practitioners, in daily newspapers and in journals in the relevant field and on local radio and television stations and shall be authorised to indicate the specific medical and surgical procedures and the diagnostic and therapeutic services actually provided, on condition that those details are accompanied by the first name, surname and professional qualifications of those responsible for each specialisation.
Ogla�evanje, ki se nana�a na zasebne klinike ter na ordinacije in ambulante, eno- ali multidisciplinarne, je dovoljeno v obliki tabel ali znakov na zgradbi, v kateri se opravlja poklicna dejavnost, ter v obliki objave v telefonskih imenikih, splo�nih poslovnih telefonskih imenikih in v strokovnih revijah, ki so izključno namenjene pripadnikom zdravni�kih poklicev, v dnevnih časopisih in informativnih revijah ter na lokalnih radijskih in televizijskih postajah, z možnostjo natančnej�e navedbe posebnih zdravni�kih in kirur�kih dejavnosti ter diagnostičnih in terapevtskih postopkov, ki se dejansko izvajajo, pod pogojem, da te podatke spremljajo ime, priimek in poklicni nazivi odgovornih za vsako specializirano področje.