natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Title II of Regulation No 1782/2003 — which is entitled ‘General provisions’ — thus contains in Chapter 1, entitled ‘Crosscompliance’, an Article 3(1) which provides
V naslovu II Uredbe �t. 1782/2003 (Splo�ne določbe) je tako v poglavju 1 (Navzkrižna skladnost) v členu 3(1) določeno, da mora vsak kmet, ki prejema neposredna plačila, spo�tovati predpisane zahteve
Development of the rules on the reductions and exclusion which apply when irregularities are identified that a farmer receiving direct payments must respect the statutory management requirements referred to in Annex III to the regulation, as well as the good agricultural and environmental condition established under Article 5 thereof.
Spremembe pravil za znižanje in izključitev zaradi nepravilnosti ravnanja iz Priloge III k tej uredbi ter dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje, določene v členu 5 te uredbe.
The statutory management requirements comprise a total of 18 regulations and directives pertaining to the environment and public health, as well as to animal and plant health.
Predpisane zahteve ravnanja skupno vključujejo 18 uredb in direktiv, ki se nana�ajo na okolje, javno zdravje ter zdravje živali in rastlin.
Regulation No 3887/92 lays down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system.
V Uredbi �t. 3887/92 so določena podrobna pravila uporabe integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema.
Article 10c of that regulation lays down the rules that apply in calculating reductions in aid in cases where there has been a failure to respect Community requirements regarding the identification and registration of unclaimed bovine animals.
V členu 10c te uredbe so določena pravila, ki se uporabljajo pri znižanju pomoči, če niso spo�tovane zahteve po registraciji goveda, za katero ni bil vložen zahtevek za pomoč.
That article reads as follows:
Besedilo tega člena je:
As regards bovine animals other than those covered by Article 10b, where on-the-spot checks reveal that the number of animals present on the holding and eligible
Glede goveda, na katero se člen 10b ne nana�a, kadar kontrola na kraju samem pokaže, da veliko živali, ki so na kmetijskem
Regulation as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1593/2000 of 17 July 2000 (OJ 2000 L 182, p. 4).
Uredba, kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) �t. 1593/2000 z dne 17. julija 2000 (UL L 182, str. 4).
Furthermore, pursuant to Article 5(1) of Regulation No 1782/2003, Member States are to ensure that all agricultural land, especially land which is no longer used for production purposes, is maintained in good agricultural and environmental condition.
Poleg tega morajo v skladu s členom 5(1) Uredbe �t. 1782/2003 države članice zagotoviti, da se vsa kmetijska zemlji�ča, zlasti zemlji�ča, ki se ne uporabljajo več za proizvodne namene, obdelujejo v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji.
Member States must, therefore, stipulate, at national or regional level, minimum requirements for good agricultural and environmental condition, on the basis of the framework set up in Annex IV to the regulation.
Države članice morajo tako na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni in na podlagi okvira, določenega v Prilogi IV k isti uredbi, opredeliti minimalne zahteve za „dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje“.
Those minimum requirements must, for example, be designed to protect the soil through the use of appropriate measures to prevent erosion, or, indeed, to maintain soil organic matter levels through appropriate practices.
Namen teh minimalnih zahtev mora biti na primer za�čita tal s primernimi ukrepi, da se prepreči erozija, ali pa ohranjanje ravni organske snovi v tleh z ustreznimi metodami.
JAGER for or relevant to Community aids does not correspond to: of Regulation (EC) No 820/97 or passports or farmer’s register entries whereby the lowest figure shall be taken.
JAGER gospodarstvu in so upravičene ali pridejo v po�tev za pomoč Skupnosti, ne ustrezajo: ali potnih listov ali vpisov v register nosilca kmetijskega gospodarstva, pri čemer se upo�teva najnižje �tevilo.
(a) the animals notified to the computerised database in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 820/97;
(a) živalim, ki so prijavljene v računalni�ki zbirki podatkov v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) �t. 820/97;
(b) the animals entered in the farmer’s register in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 820/97;
(b) živalim, ki so vpisane v register nosilca kmetijskega gospodarstva v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (ES) �t. 820/97;
If the difference found during an on-the-spot check is greater than 20% of the number of eligible animals established, no premium shall be granted for the 12 months prior to the on-the-spot check.’
Če je odstopanje pri kontroli na kraju samem večje od 20 % ugotovljenega �tevila upravičenih živali, se za obdobje dvanajstih mesecev pred kontrolo na kraju samem ne dodeli nikakr�na premija.“
(c) the passports of animals held on the holding in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 820/97, the total amount of the aid granted to the applicant for the aid scheme concerned for the 12 months prior to the on-the-spot check revealing such findings shall, except in cases of force majeure, be reduced proportionately.
(c) potnim listom za živali na kmetijskem gospodarstvu v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) �t. 820/97, se skupni znesek pomoči, ki naj bi se podelil nosilcu kmetijskega gospodarstva v okviru sheme zadevne pomoči za obdobje dvanajst mesecev pred kontrolo na kraju samem, ki je privedla do teh ugotovitev, sorazmerno zniža, razen v primeru vi�je sile.
The reduction shall be calculated on the basis of the number of all animals present for the scheme concerned or entries in the computerised database in accordance with Article 5
Znižanje se izračuna na podlagi celotnega �tevila živali, predvidenih za zadevno shemo, ali na podlagi navedb v računalni�ki zbirki podatkov iz člena 5 Uredbe ES �t. 820/97
No 2419, among other things, by adding to the end of the first subparagraph of Article 39(1) of that regulation the following sentence:
V členu 39 te uredbe (Kr�itve določb o identifikaciji in registraciji goveda, za katero ni vložen zahtevek) je v odstavku 1, prvi pododstavek, določeno:
‘However, the amount of aid to be reduced shall not be more than 20% of that total amount to which the farmer is entitled.’
„Vendar pa se znesek pomoči ne zniža za več kakor za 20 % skupnega zneska, do katerega je nosilec kmetijskega gospodarstva upravičen.“
Articles 36 to 43 of Regulation No 2419/2001, which appear in Title IV of the regulation entitled ‘Basis for the calculation of the aid, reductions and exclusions’, lay down the rules applicable where irregularities are found in respect of ‘livestock’ aid applications.
Uredba �t. 2419/2001 je bila razveljavljena z Uredbo �t.
Article 39 of the regulation is entitled ‘Non-compliance with the provisions concerning the identification and registration of unclaimed bovine animals’, and, in the first subparagraph of Article 39(1), it provides as follows:
796/2004, v kateri, naj �e enkrat poudarim, so določena podrobna pravila za izvajanje navzkrižne skladnosti, modulacije in integriranega administrativnega in kontrolnega sistema, predvidena z Uredbo �t. 1782/2003.
‘Where cases of noncompliance with the provisions of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals are found as a result of an on-the-spot check concerning unclaimed bovine animals, the total amount of aid to which the farmer is entitled pursuant to Article 36(3) under the bovine aid schemes for the premium period concerned, where appropriate after the application of reductions in accordance with Article 38, shall, except in cases of force majeure or exceptional circumstances within the meaning of Article 48, be reduced by an amount to be calculated on the basis of the formula set out in paragraph 2.’
„Če se pri kontroli na kraju samem odkrijejo kr�itve določb sistema za identifikacijo in registracijo goveda, za katero ni vložen zahtevek, se skupni znesek pomoči, do katere je nosilec kmetijskega gospodarstva upravičen skladno s členom 36(3) v okviru programov pomoči za govedo za zadevno premijsko obdobje, če je to primerno po uporabi znižanj skladno s členom 38, razen v primerih vi�je sile ali izrednih okoli�čin v smislu člena 48, zniža za znesek, ki se izračuna na osnovi formule iz odstavka 2.“
Commission Regulation (EC) No 118/2004 of 23 January 2004 16amended Regulation
2419/2001 je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) �t. 118/2004 z dne 23. januarja 2004 16, s katero je bil na konec
Title IV of Regulation No 796/2004 includes the rules applicable to the basis for the calculation of the aid, reductions and exclusions.
V naslovu IV Uredbe �t. 796/2004 so določena pravila, ki se uporabljajo kot podlaga za izračun pomoči, znižanj in izključitev.
Article 66 and 67 No 796/2004 read as follows:
Člena 66 in 67 Uredbe �t. 796/2004 določata:
Articles 57 to 63 of the regulation, which are contained in Title IV, Chapter I, entitled ‘Findings in relation to eligibility criteria’, lay down the rules applicable to ‘livestock’ premia.
V členih od 57 do 63 iz poglavja I (Ugotovitve v zvezi z merili o izpolnjevanju pogojev) naslova IV te uredbe so določena pravila, ki se uporabljajo za premije „na žival“.
In that connection, Article 59 of that regulation lays down the reductions and exclusions applicable to bovine animals in respect of which aid is claimed.
V tem okviru so v členu 59 te uredbe določena znižanja in izključitve glede goveda, ki so predmet zahtevkov za pomoč.
Articles 66 and 67 of Regulation No 796/2004, which are contained in Title IV, Chapter II, entitled ‘Findings in relation to cross compliance’, lay down the rules which apply in the event that the acts and standards required under crosscompliance obligations have not been respected.
V členih 66 in 67, ki spadata v poglavje II (Ugotovitve v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo) naslova IV Uredbe �t. 796/2004, pa so določena pravila za primere, ko se zahteve in standardi, ki so del navzkrižne skladnosti, ne spo�tujejo.
Without prejudice to Article 71, where a noncompliance determined results from the negligence of the farmer, a reduction shall be applied on the overall amount of direct payments, as defined in Article 2(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 [ 17], that has been, or has to be, granted to the farmer concerned following aid applications he has submitted or will still submit in the course of the calendar year of the finding.
Brez vpliva na člen 71, kadar je ugotovljena neskladnost zaradi malomarnosti kmeta, se uporabi znižanje za celotni znesek neposrednih plačil, kakor so opredeljena v členu 2(d) Uredbe (ES) �t.
That reduction shall, as a general rule, be 3% of that overall amount.
1782/2003[ 17], ki je bil ali mora biti odobren za zadevnega kmeta po zahtevku za pomoč, ki ga je predložil ali ga �e bo predložil v koledarskem letu ugotovitve To znižanje praviloma zna�a 3 % celotnega zneska.
However, the Paying Agency may, on the basis of the assessment provided by the competent control authority in the control
Plačilna agencija lahko na podlagi ocene, ki jo zagotovi pristojni organ v poročilu o
Those two articles, therefore, implement Article 6(1) of Regulation No 1782/2003, which provides that where the statutory management requirements or good agricultural and environmental condition are not complied with, as a result of an action or omission directly attributable to the individual farmer, the total amount of direct payments to be granted in the calendar year in which the noncompliance occurs is to be reduced or cancelled, after application of Articles 10 and 11 of the regulation, that is to say, after application of both the modulation of the direct payments and any adjustment of the direct payments for reasons of financial discipline.
Z navedenima členoma se tako izvaja člen 6(1) Uredbe �t. 1782/2003, v katerem je določeno, da če predpisane zahteve ravnanja ali dobri kmetijski in okoljski pogoji niso izpolnjeni kot posledica ukrepanja ali neukrepanja, ki se lahko pripi�e neposredno posameznemu kmetu, se celotni znesek neposrednih plačil, ki naj bi se odobril v koledarskem letu, v katerem je pri�lo do neizpolnitve, zmanj�a ali prekliče po uporabi členov 10 in 11 te uredbe: torej po eni strani po uporabi modulacije neposrednih plačil, po drugi strani pa po morebitni prilagoditvi neposrednih plačil zaradi finančne discipline.
Without prejudice to cases of intentional noncompliance in accordance with Article 67, where repeated noncompliances have been determined, the percentage fixed in accordance with paragraph 1 with regard to the first noncompliance shall, in respect of the first repetition, be multiplied by the factor three.
Kadar so bile ugotovljene ponovne neskladnosti, se brez vpliva na primere namerne neskladnosti v skladu s členom 67 odstotek, določen v skladu z odstavkom 1 pri prvi neskladnosti, pomnoži s faktorjem tri v zvezi s prvo ponovitvijo.
For this purpose, the Paying Agency shall, in the case where that percentage was fixed in accordance with paragraph 2, determine the percentage that would have been applied to the first noncompliance with the requirement or standard concerned.
V primeru, ko je bil ta odstotek določen v skladu z odstavkom 2, plačilna agencija za ta namen ugotovi odstotek, ki bi bil uporabljen za prvo neskladnost z zadevno zahtevo ali standardom.
Where more than one case of noncompliance with regard to various acts or standards of the same area of crosscompliance have been determined, those cases shall, for the purposes of the fixing of the reduction in accordance with paragraph 1, be considered as one noncompliance.
Kadar je bil ugotovljen več kakor en primer neskladnosti v zvezi z različnimi akti ali standardi na istem področju navzkrižne skladnosti, se ti primeri za določitev znižanja v skladu z odstavkom 1 �tejejo za eno neskladnost.
In the case of further repetitions, the multiplication factor three shall be applied each time to the result of the reduction fixed in respect of the previous repeated noncompliance.
Pri nadaljnjih ponovitvah se večkratnik tri uporablja za vsak rezultat znižanja, določenega v zvezi s prej�njo ponovljeno neskladnostjo.
The maximum reduction shall, however, not exceed 15% of the overall amount referred to in paragraph 1.
Največje znižanje pa ne presega 15 % skupnega zneska iz odstavka 1.
Where more than one noncompliance with regard to different areas of crosscompliance have been determined, the procedure for the fixing of the reduction as set out in paragraph 1 shall be applied individually to any noncompliance.
Kadar je bila ugotovljena več kakor ena neskladnost v zvezi z različnimi področji navzkrižne skladnosti, se postopek za določitev znižanja, naveden v odstavku 1, uporabi posamično za vsako neskladnost.
However, a noncompliance with a standard which also constitutes a requirement shall be considered to be one noncompliance.
Vendar pa se neskladnost s standardom, ki predstavlja tudi zahtevo, obravnava kot ena neskladnost.
The resulting percentages of reductions shall be added.
Ko je dosežen največji odstotek 15 %, plačilna agencija obvesti zadevnega kmeta, da se �teje, če se ista neskladnost ponovno ugotovi, da je deloval namerno v smislu člena 67.
The maximum reduction shall, however, not exceed 5% of the overall amount referred to in paragraph 1.
Če se pozneje ugotovi nadaljnja neskladnost, se odstotek znižanja, ki ga je treba uporabiti, določi tako, da se rezultat prej�nje pomnožitve, kjer je to primerno, pomnoži s faktorjem tri, preden se uporabi omejitev 15 %, kakor je predvideno v zadnjem stavku drugega pododstavka.
Where a further noncompliance is being determined thereafter, the percentage of reduction to be applied shall be fixed by multiplying the result of the previous multiplication, where applicable, before the limitation to 15% as provided for in the last sentence of the second subparagraph has been applied, by the factor three.
Posledični odstotki znižanj se se�tejejo. Največje znižanje pa ne presega 5 % skupnega zneska iz odstavka 1.
Where the intentional noncompliance relates to a particular aid scheme, the farmer shall be excluded from that aid scheme for the calendar year in question.
Kadar se namerna neskladnost nana�a na posebno shemo pomoči, se kmet izključi iz te sheme pomoči za zadevno koledarsko leto.
In the case where a repeated noncompliance is determined together with another noncompliance or another repeated noncompliance, the resulting percentage reductions shall be added together.
Če se ugotovi ponovljena neskladnost skupaj z drugo neskladnostjo ali z drugo ponovljeno neskladnostjo, se posledični odstotki znižanja se�tejejo.
Without prejudice to the third subparagraph of paragraph 4, the maximum reduction shall, however, not exceed 15% of the overall amount referred to in paragraph 1.
Brez poseganja v tretji pododstavek odstavka 4 pa največje znižanje ne presega 15 % skupnega zneska iz odstavka 1.
In cases of extreme extent, severity or permanence or where repeated intentional noncompliances have been determined, the farmer shall, moreover, be excluded from the aid scheme concerned in the following calendar year.’
V primerih izjemnega obsega, resnosti ali stalnosti ali kadar so ugotovljene ponavljajoče namerne neskladnosti, je kmet tudi izključen iz zadevne sheme pomoči v naslednjem koledarskem letu.“
Application of reductions and exclusions in cases of intentional noncompliance
Uporaba znižanj in izključitev v primerih namerne neskladnosti
Temporal application of the administrative penalties for which the Community instruments provide
Časovna veljavnost upravnih kazni, ki so določene v aktih Skupnosti
Article 1 of Regulation No 2988/95 reads as follows:
Člen 1 Uredbe �t. 2988/95 določa:
For the purposes of protecting the European Communities’ financial interests, general rules are hereby adopted relating to homogenous checks and to administrative measures and penalties concerning irregularities with regard to Community law.
Kadar je ugotovljeno neskladnost kmet povzročil namerno, je brez vpliva na člen 71 znižanje, ki ga je treba uporabiti za celotni znesek iz prvega pododstavka člena 66(1), praviloma 20 % tega celotnega zneska.
However, the Paying Agency may, on the basis of the assessment provided by the competent control authority in the control report in accordance with Article 48(1)(c), decide to reduce that percentage to no less than 15% or, where appropriate, to increase that percentage to up to 100% of that overall amount.
Plačilna agencija pa lahko na podlagi ocene pristojnega nadzornega organa v poročilu o kontroli v skladu s členom 48(l)(c) sklene, da bo znižala odstotek na ne manj kakor 15 % ali, kadar je to primerno, povečala znesek do 100 % celotnega zneska.
That Law also establishes a hybrid model, that is to say, a model which combines the historic and regional approaches.
Poleg tega ta zakon vzpostavlja me�ani model, ki uporablja kombinacijo zgodovinskega in regionalnega pristopa.
II — The main proceedings and the question referred
II – Spor o glavni stvari in vprašanje za predhodno odločanje
Article 2(2) of that regulation then provides that:
V členu 2(2) iste uredbe je določeno:
‘No administrative penalty may be imposed unless a Community act prior to the irregularity has made provision for it.
„Za nepravilnost ni mogoče izreči upravne kazni, če kazen ni bila prej določena v aktu Skupnosti.
In the event of a subsequent amendment of the provisions which impose administrative penalties and are contained in Community rules, the less severe provisions shall apply retroactively.’
Če so se določbe o upravnih kaznih v predpisih Skupnosti pozneje spremenile, se za nazaj uporabljajo milej�e določbe.“
By a decision of 24 January 2002, the Amt rejected his application absolutely, on the ground that an on-the-spot check had revealed irregularities within the meaning of Article 10c(1) of Regulation No 3887/92, and that the discrepancy that had been found represented more than 20% of the eligible animals.
Amt je z odločbo z dne 24. januarja 2002 v celoti zavrnil ta zahtevek z obrazložitvijo, da so bile med kontrolo na kraju samem ugotovljene nepravilnosti v smislu člena 10c(1) Uredbe �t. 3887/92, pri čemer je bilo odstopanje večje od 20 % �tevila upravičenih živali.
JAGER that the provisions relating to ‘livestock’ premia, laid down in Articles 57 to 63 of Regulation No 796/2004, have ceased to be applicable in that Member State.
JAGER enotno plačilo, tako da se določbe o premijah „na žival“ iz členov od 57 do 63 Uredbe �t. 796/2004 v tej državi članici ne uporabljajo več.
Consequently, the Verwaltungsgericht decided to stay proceedings and submit to the Court of Justice the following question for a preliminary ruling: ‘[i]s a provision imposing a more favourable penalty (concerning livestock aid) to be applied retroactively even if that provision in principle only applies for a period of time during which livestock aid in the Member State concerned is no longer granted as a direct payment has been introduced?’
Zato je Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo vpra�anje, „ali je treba določbo, ki predvideva milej�e kazni (kar zadeva premije za živali), uporabiti retroaktivno, čeprav se ta določba načeloma uporablja samo za obdobje, v katerem se v zadevni državi članici, v kateri je bil vzpostavljen sistem neposredne podpore, premije za živali ne dodeljujejo več“.
In point of fact, the provisions of Articles 57 to 63 of that regulation, which, according to the Verwaltungsgericht, largely reproduce those of Articles 36 to 43 of Regulation No 2419/2001, no longer contain a provision similar to Article 39 of the latter regulation.
Členi od 57 do 63 te uredbe, ki naj bi sicer v pretežnem delu povzeli določbe členov od 36 do 43 Uredbe �t. 2419/2001, naj namreč ne bi več vsebovali določbe, ki bi bila analogna členu 39 zadnjenavedene uredbe.
Thus, the absence of a penalty is the most favourable option possible for Mr Jager.
Tako naj bi bil neobstoj kazni najmilej�a kazen, ki bi lahko doletela R. Jager.
The Court has recently held that the principle of the retroactive application of a more lenient penalty forms part of the constitutional traditions common to the Member States and, accordingly, must be considered to be one of the general principles of Community law which the Court ensures are respected and with which national courts are required to comply. 19
Sodi�če je �e nedavno tega poudarilo, da je načelo retroaktivne uporabe milej�e kazni del skupnih ustavnih tradicij držav članic, zato ga je treba �teti za del splo�nih načel prava Skupnosti in mora Sodi�če zagotavljati njegovo spo�tovanje, nacionalno sodi�če pa ga mora upo�tevati. 19
19 — See, to that effect, the abovementioned judgments in Berlusconi and Others (paragraphs 67 to 69) and Campina (paragraph 32).
19 – V tem smislu glej zgoraj navedeni sodbi Berlusconi in drugi (točke od 67 do 69) in Campina (točka 32).
However, the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin queries whether that more favourable penalty may be applied in this case, given that, since 1 January 2005, the suckler cow premium has been granted, in Germany, in the form of a single payment, with the result
Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin pa se vendarle spra�uje, ali bi bilo treba to ugodnej�o določbo uporabiti v postopku v glavni stvari, ker se v Nemčiji od 1. januarja 2005 premija za kravo dojiljo dodeli kot
That principle is more specifically laid down in the second sentence of Article 2(2) of Regulation No 2988/95. 20
To načelo je �e posebno jasno izraženo v členu 2(2), drugi stavek, Uredbe �t. 2988/95. 20
— the penalty for which the new rules provide must be less severe than the original penalty.
Jager, Amt, gr�ka vlada, Komisija in predložitveno sodi�če, da se sistem kazni, predviden v členu 39 Uredbe �t.
In its abovementioned judgment in Gerken, the Court made the application of Article 2(2) subject to the following four conditions: 21
Sodi�če je v zgoraj navedeni sodbi Gerken navedlo naslednje �tiri pogoje, ki morajo biti izpolnjeni za uporabo te določbe: 21
— there must be an irregularity within the meaning of Article 1(2) of Regulation No 2988/95;
– obstoj nepravilnosti v smislu člena 1(2) Uredbe �t. 2988/95;