natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
All this creates an atmosphere of rigour and respect tempered by shimmering shapes and colours.
Vse to ustvarja strogo in spoštljivo ozračje, ki je omehčano s slikovitimi oblikami in barvami.
I can think of no better way to illustrate this than to invite you to look at the artist’s depiction in this room of Justice, who does not brandish a sword, but holds her scales firmly, with all the grace and freshness of a young girl.
Za boljšo predstavo o tej nenavadni strukturi vas vabim na predstavitev, ki jo je pripravil umetnik v tej dvorani gospe Pravice, ki brez vihtenja meča čvrsto drži svojo tehtnico, pri čemer ohranja mil in svež izraz mladenke.
The architects, Messrs Conzemius, Jamagne and Vander Elst were determined to cast o the shackles of conformism to create a building which, while externally it confounds the champions of the classicism of the temples of Themis, internally, in its use of modern materials and intelligent use of mass and space, has an atmosphere of sober opulence and functional freedom.
Arhitekti Conzemius, Jamagne in Vander Elst so pogumno opustili stare konformistične prijeme, da bi ustvarili stavbo, ki z zunanjostjo bega pristaše klasicizma templjev Temide, z modernimi materiali in domiselno uporabo prostora pa polni notranjost z zmernim bogastvom in funkcionalno lahkotnostjo.
The execution of this plan required a particular contribution from artists.
Taka izvedba je zahtevala poseben umetniški prispevek.
At the suggestion of the President of the Court of Justice, eminent artists from the Member States, including Dambiermont, Grieshaber, Hambourg, Manzú and Wercollier, helped to embellish the building and its surroundings through their remarkable works of art.”
Na predlog predsednika Sodišča so izvrstni umetniki iz držav članic, in sicer Dambiermont, Grieshaber, Hambourg, Manzú in Wercollier s svojimi znamenitimi deli prispevali k estetski podobi te stavbe in njene okolice.“
Address by Mr Pierre Werner, Minister of State and President of the Government of Luxembourg, on the occasion of the inauguration of the Palais of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, on 9 January 1973, in Luxembourg.
Nagovor Pierra Wernerja, finančnega ministra in predsednika vlade, ob slovesnem odprtju sodne palače Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti 9. januarja 1973 v Luxembourgu
“… the most elevated symbols must be rooted in the ground of reality.
„… najpomembnejši simboli se morajo ukoreniniti v življenje.
This is the thinking of your Government and your Parliament which undertook to create for our Court a spacious setting adapted to its needs, equipped with the most up-to-date facilities and creating a happy marriage of functional objectives and decorative concerns.” “… All we had to do was wait.
Prav to sta imela v mislih vaša vlada in parlament, ki sta se odločila, da našemu Sodišču priskrbita velik prostor, prilagojen njegovim potrebam, opremljen z najsodobnejšo opremo in ki združuje funkcionalni in estetski vidik.“ „… Potrebno je bilo le počakati!
Wait for the completion of the work so that we could enter these premises to discover, behind the sombre exterior of the material, a veritable palace of glass.
Počakati na dokončanje del, da bi lahko vstopili v te prostore in za mračnim zunanjim videzom odkrili resnično stekleno palačo.
Viollet-le-Duc was right: “buildings reect the society of an era”. Today all we need do is open our eyes to see that the construction is pleasing, comfortable, harmonious and of human proportions, it celebrates the horizontal line, and is constructed in full light on a remarkable site.”
Viollet-le-Duc je imel torej prav: ‚Zgradbe so zrcalo družbe neke dobe.‘ Danes zadostuje, da odpremo oči in vidimo, da je stavba prijetna, udobna, skladna, prilagojena človekovim potrebam, zasnovana kot nizka gradnja na sončni legi v čudovitem okolju.“
Address by Mr Robert Lecourt, President of the Court of Justice, on the occasion of the inauguration of the Palais of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, on 9 January 1973, in Luxembourg.
Nagovor Roberta Lecourta, predsednika Sodišča, ob slovesnem odprtju sodne palače Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti 9. januarja 1973 v Luxembourgu
Ink drawing by André Hambourg on a first day cover to mark the occasion of the inauguration ceremony of the Palais of the Court of Justice (9 January 1973).
Risba s peresom Andréja Hambourga na naslovnici „Prvi dan“ ob slovesnem odprtju sodne palače Sodišča (9. januar 1973).
Donated by André Hambourg to the Court of Justice.
Darilo Andréja Hambourga Sodišču.
1973-1999 hen designing the Palais inaugurated on 9 January 1973, the architects tried to remain faithful to traditional European court architecture by
Od 1973 do 1999 rhitekti so pri zasnovi sodne palače, ki so jo slovesno odprli 9. januarja 1973, upoštevali evropsko tradicijo načrtovanja sodnih stavb in ji omo-
W giving the building an independence, an identity and a degree of visibility in relation to its immediate surroundings.
A gočili samostojnost, identiteto ter prepoznavnost v okolju.
The metal skeleton of the building and the other parts of the exterior were constructed of Corox steel.
Kovinsko ogrodje stavbe in drugi deli pročelja so bili zgrajeni iz jekla, imenovanega „corox“.
The other, more traditional, materials used in and around the building were chosen for their compatibility and harmony with the main metallic structure as well as for their functional value.
Drugi, bolj tradicionalni materiali, ki so bili uporabljeni v notranjosti in okolici stavbe, so bili izbrani ne le zaradi svoje uporabnosti, ampak tudi zaradi skladnosti s kovinskim ogrodjem.
The landscaping of the surrounding area has two essential aspects: the plaza and the park.
Okolico sestavljata dva glavna dela: trg in park.
The raised plaza serves as a base for the building and anchors it to the ground; the design of the plaza echoes the contour of the whole structure.
Trg je s svojim podzidkom temelj stavbe, s katerim je ta pritrjena na zemljišče; načrt trga je skladen s celotno strukturo.
The overriding concern in the landscaping of the site was to integrate the building into its surroundings and so to counterbalance its severe architecture.
Ureditev zemljišča je narekovala skrb, da se stavba umesti v zeleno okolje in se tako uravnoteži strogost arhitekture.
Once this building was opened, all the staff of the Court could be accommodated under one roof.
Zaradi posaditve drevja in grmičja v okolici je stavba obdana z zelenjem in se naravno umešča v okolje.
The need for additional premises as a result of successive accessions of States to the Community led first of all to the amenity areas within the buildings gradually being taken over for use as oces.
Zaradi prostorskih potreb, ki so se pojavile s prihodnjimi pristopi k Skupnosti, so začeli prostore, ki so bili v teh stavbah namenjeni razvedrilu, uporabljati kot pisarne.
Ultimately it was impossible to avoid giving up part of the landscaped area surrounding the Palais and building three extensions, designed by the Luxembourg architects Fritsch, Herr and Huyberecht and the Italian architect Paczowski: first the Erasmus building (1988) to accommodate the Court of First Instance which had just been established, then the Thomas More building (1993), and finally the C building (1994).
Nazadnje je bilo treba nekaj zelenih površin okoli sodne palače nameniti za postopno gradnjo treh prizidkov, ki so jih zasnovali luksemburški arhitekti Fritsch, Herr in Hugberechts ter italijanski arhitekt Paczowski: najprej je bila leta 1988 zgrajena stavba Erasmus, da bi se vanjo vselilo tedaj ustanovljeno Sodišče prve stopnje, nato leta 1993 stavba Thomas More in leta 1994 stavba C.
The attachment to the Palais and the desire to preserve its aesthetics and its symbolic function resulted in a severe restriction being imposed on the architects for the construction of these annexes: not to build above the level of the Palais square.
Povezanost s sodno palačo in želja po ohranitvi estetike in simbolnega pomena sta za arhitekte pomenili precejšnjo omejitev pri načrtovanju prizidkov – njihova višina ni smela preseči višine vhoda v sodno palačo.
The beginnings of the project to construct new buildings – 1994 t the start of the 1990s the Court began to plan an ambitious
Razvoj projekta – 1994 začetku devetdesetih let je bilo treba sodno palačo izprazniti za-
The architectural design submitted by Dominique Perrault perfectly fullled these requirements. It comprises:
Arhitekturni projekt, ki ga je zasnoval Dominique Perrault, je popolnoma zadostil tem potrebam.
- a two-storey peristyle building called the “Anneau” (literally, “Ring” in English) in spite of its rectangular form, because it encircles the original Palais.
– „Obroč“ je stavba v dveh nadstropjih in se kljub pravokotni obliki imenuje tako, ker obkroža staro sodno palačo.
The Anneau is designed to be a non-public area reserved for the work of the Judges and Advocates General along with their sta, which can accommodate up to 40 Members and their chambers;
Zasnovan je bil kot javnosti zaprt prostor, namenjen delovanju sodnikov in generalnih pravobranilcev ter njihovih sodelavcev, v katerega je mogoče namestiti do štirideset kabinetov članov Sodišča.
The Luxembourg authorities agreed to act as project contractor within the framework of an agreement, endorsed by the budgetary authority of the Union, under the terms of which the Court undertook to take over the buildings under a lease-purchase system.
Luksemburški organi so arhitekta Dominiqua Perraulta prosili, naj oblikuje projekt in pri tem upošteva ne le potrebe Sodišča, ampak tudi duha, v kakršnem je Sodišče želelo, da se projekt izvede.
- the original Palais, preserved but remodelled.
– Stara sodna palača je ohranjena, vendar prenovljena.
The entire available space is now given over to courtrooms, in other words, to the public face of justice.
Celoten razpoložljiv prostor je odslej namenjen razpravnim dvoranam, torej javnemu vidiku sojenja.
These rooms are equipped with appropriate technology to comply with the Court’s multilingual requirements and are suf-ciently large to cope with the increase in judicial proceedings;
Da bi te dvorane, ki glede na svoj obseg lahko zadostijo povečanju sodne dejavnosti, prilagodili potrebam Sodišča, so vanje namestili tehnologijo za delo v več jezikih.
The Luxembourg authorities asked the architect Dominique Perrault to draw up a plan taking into account not only the needs of the Court but also the spirit in which the Court wanted the project to be carried out.
Sodišče namreč ni nameravalo zgraditi novega prizidka, ampak prenoviti celotno stavbo in jo spremeniti v novo sodno palačo. Pri tem pa je bilo treba:
- two Towers to be joined, eventually, by a third tower, the construction of which will not jar with the overall scheme of the architectural project;
– Dvema stolpoma bodo pozneje dodali še tretjega, katerega gradnja ne bo ogrozila namena arhitekturnega projekta.
For the Court, the project was not about simply constructing a new extension but about reviewing the entire complex of Court buildings so as to design a new Palais, taking into account the need:
– oblikovati razvojni projekt, s katerim bi zadostili povečanju števila držav članic in s tem sodnikov, generalnih pravobranilcev ter osebja ali celo sodišč, ne da bi pri tem posegali v splošno arhitekturno zasnovo stavbe;
- a Gallery, which gives an architectural and functional unity to the new complex by linking all the new and existing buildings.
– Galerija povezuje različne dejavnosti institucije in zagotavlja arhitekturno in funkcionalno enotnost novega kompleksa z novimi in starimi stavbami.
- to be able to adapt to cope with an increase in the number of Member States, and consequently Judges, Advocates General and sta, and even the addition of new courts, without disrupting the overall scheme of the architecture;
– jasno ločiti javne prostore, povezane s sodno dejavnostjo, od „zasebnih“ prostorov, med katere spadajo pisarne kabinetov članov Sodišča in služb Sodišča, ter tako zagotoviti optimalno varovanje;
- to give the new building the same iconic value as the Palais inaugurated In 1973;
– zagotoviti, da bo imela nova stavba enako simbolno vrednost kot sodna palača, ki je bila zgrajena leta 1973.
The project works by adding buildings in an arrangement which respects and enhances existing buildings.
Projekt „se izvaja z dodajanjem stavb v kompozicijo, ki upošteva in estetsko nadgrajuje obstoječe stavbe“.
The original Palais
Stara sodna palača
The courtrooms he original Palais of the Court, the external appearance and original structure of which have been preserved, is now dedicated entirely to the public face of justice, as the place where hearings, which are open to the public, are held.
Razpravne dvorane tara sodna palača Sodišča, katere videz in prvotna struktura sta bila ohranjena, je odslej prostor, ki je v celoti namenjen javnemu vidiku sojenja, torej v njej potekajo razprave, na katerih je lahko navzoča javnost.
The building houses the five courtrooms on three floors, the courtrooms preceded by large interconnecting halls, known as “salles des Pas Perdus”.
V stavbi je v treh nadstropjih razporejenih pet razpravnih dvoran, pred katerimi so veliki, med seboj povezani prostori, ki sestavljajo pet avl (Salle des pas perdus).
The courtrooms are where the parties argue their cases, the Advocates General deliver their Opinions and judgments are given.
V razpravnih dvoranah potekajo ustne razprave, predstavitve sklepnih predlogov generalnih pravobranilcev ter razglasitve sodb.
According to the nature of the case, dierent persons appear before the Court.
Navzočnost različnih udeležencev pred Sodiščem je odvisna od narave posamezne zadeve.
The majority of cases come from the national courts, which refer questions to the Court on the interpretation or validity of a provision of Community law.
Večino zadev sprožijo nacionalna sodišča, ki Sodišče sprašujejo o razlagi ali veljavnosti predpisa Skupnosti.
In such a case, known as a reference for a preliminary ruling, those appearing before the Court are the lawyers of the parties before the national court which has referred the question, agents of the Governments of the Member States which submitted observations and the agents of the institutions, primarily of the Commission, guardian of the Treaties.
V tako imenovanih postopkih za predhodno odločanje pred Sodiščem nastopajo odvetniki, ki zastopajo stranke pred nacionalnim sodiščem, ki postavi vprašanje, zastopniki vlad držav članic, ki se jim zdi potrebno predložiti stališča, in zastopniki institucij, med katerimi je na prvem mestu Komisija kot varuhinja ustanovnih pogodb.
In the other categories of case brought before the Court, that is to say, direct actions and appeals against the decisions of the Court of First Instance, the agents of the Governments of the Member States concerned, the agents of the institutions and, in appeals, the lawyers of the parties, appear before the Court.
V drugih skupinah zadev, predloženih Sodišču, torej pri neposrednih tožbah in pritožbah zoper odločbe Sodišča prve stopnje, nastopajo zastopniki vlad zadevnih držav članic, zastopniki institucij in pri pritožbah odvetniki strank.
In 2008, the Court held 229 hearings in 154 references for a preliminary ruling and 75 direct actions and appeals.
Sodišče je leta 2008 opravilo 229 obravnavi, in sicer v 154 postopkih za predhodno odločanje in v 75 postopkih na podlagi neposrednih tožb in pritožb.
192 Opinions and 333 judgments were delivered.
Predstavljenih je bilo 192 sklepnih predlogov in razglašenih 333 sodb.
THE ORIGINAL PALAIS
STARA SODNA PALAČA
The Square
Vhod
The entrance hall, the grand staircase: an almost natural, unimpeded pathway, bathed in daylight, which leads to the main courtroom.
Preddverje, veliko stopnišče: skoraj naravna, neovirana pot, osvetljena z dnevno svetlobo, ki vodi do velike razpravne dvorane.
A solemn space which creates the distance and the respect necessary for the dispensing of justice.
Svečan prostor, ki ustvarja potrebno distanco in spoštovanje do dela Sodišča.
The Grand Staircase
Veliko stopnišče
Salle des Pas Perdus: “Hall of a courthouse for the use of the departments and chambers of a court; where those waiting come and go”.
Avla: „Prostor sodne palače, ki vodi do sodnih služb ali sodnih senatov; kamor gredo in od koder pridejo osebe, ki čakajo“.
There can be no court without a “salle des Pas Perdus”, that is to say, without that space separating the “profane” from the “sacred” which allows access in stages to the courtroom where justice is dispensed in public and with ceremony.
Ni sodne palače brez avle, torej brez prostora, ki ločuje „posvetno“ od „svetega“ in omogoča postopen dostop do razpravne dvorane , v kateri se javno in svečano izreka pravica.
The Courtrooms
Razpravne dvorane
Identical in structure, the five courtrooms all follow the same design : the rostrum where the Judges sit, the Advocate General on the left and the registrar for the hearing on the right ; the tables and lecterns for the lawyers or agents ; the tables for the Court ushers ; the public benches.In most of the cases brought before the Court a hearing is held.
Pet razpravnih dvoran z enako strukturo je zasnovanih na istem modelu: podij, na katerem sedijo sodniki, generalni pravobranilec na levi in sodni tajnik na desni strani; mize in govorni oder za odvetnike ali zastopnike; mize sodnih slug in klopi za javnost.V večini zadev, predloženih Sodišču, se opravi obravnava.
It is in the courtrooms, too, that the Advocates General present their Opinions and judgments are delivered by the Judges The decision as to which courtroom will be used in each case depends on the composition of the bench hearing the case (full court, Grand Chamber, 5-member chamber, 3-member chamber), the number of interveners, the language requirements and the number of visitors.
V razpravnih dvoranah generalni pravobranilci prav tako predstavljajo svoje sklepne predloge in sodniki razglašajo sodbe.Razpravna dvorana se za vsako zadevo izbere glede na sestavo senata (plenarno zasedanje, veliki senat, senat petih sodnikov ali senat treh sodnikov), število udeležencev, jezikovne potrebe in navzočnost obiskovalcev.
However, only the main courtroom can accommodate the full court. In the main courtroom the formal sittings for the swearing of the oath before the Court by the Members of the three courts take place.
Plenarno zasedanje lahko poteka le v veliki razpravni dvorani.V veliki razpravni dvorani člani treh sodišč slovesno prisežejo pred Sodiščem.
It is also in the main courtroom that the solemn undertakings provided for by the Treaties are given by the Members of the European Commission, of the European Court of Auditors and by the European Ombudsman.
Prav tako se v tej veliki dvorani v skladu z ustanovnimi pogodbami pred Sodiščem slovesno obvežejo člani Evropske komisije in Evropskega računskega sodišča ter evropski varuh človekovih pravic.
Entrance.
Vhod.
On level 2, the main courtroom (41 Members, 300 seats, 23 interpretation booths).
Drugo nadstropje, velika razpravna dvorana (41 članov, 300 sedežev, 23 kabin za simultano tolmačenje).
On level 6, two courtrooms (17 Members, 100 seats, 19 interpretation booths).On level 8, two courtrooms (9 Members, 107 seats, 11 interpretation booths).
Šesto nadstropje, dve razpravni dvorani (17 članov, 100 sedežev, 19 kabin za simultano tolmačenje).Osmo nadstropje, dve razpravni dvorani (9 članov, 107 sedežev, 11 kabin za simultano tolmačenje).
The Main Courtroom.
Velika razpravna dvorana.
The rostrum where the Judges, the Advocate General and the registrar for the hearing sit.
Podij, na katerem so nameščene klopi za sodnike, generalnega pravobranilca in sodnega tajnika.
The interpretation booths
Kabine za simultano tolmačenje
The Statute of the Court of Justice and its Rules of Procedure establish strict language arrangements based on the concept of the language of the case.
Statut in Poslovnik Sodišča vzpostavljata strogo jezikovno ureditev, ki temelji na jeziku postopka.
Any of the ocial languages may be the language of the case and it is in that language that the parties’ lawyers and the agents of the institutions must express themselves, while the agents of the Governments of the Member States use their own language.
Vsak od uradnih jezikov je lahko jezik postopka, v katerem se morajo izražati odvetniki strank in zastopniki institucij, zastopniki vlad držav članic pa uporabljajo svoj jezik.
In a reference for a preliminary ruling, by a national court, the language of the case is that of the national court. In direct actions, the language of the case is chosen by the applicant, unless the defendant is a Member State.
V postopku za predhodno odločanje, ki ga je začelo nacionalno sodišče, je jezik postopka jezik nacionalnega sodišča.V primeru neposrednih tožb jezik postopka izbere tožeča stranka, razen če je tožena stranka država članica.
Against that background it is clear that simultaneous interpretation plays an essential role in ensuring that all have equal access to justice and that all those involved in proceedings can understand one another.
Za zagotovitev enakosti pri dostopu do sodišča in zagotovitev medsebojnega razumevanja vseh udeležencev postopka je pomemben sistem simultanega tolmačenja.
The number of booths used at a hearing depends on the linguistic needs of those involved.
Število kabin, ki se uporabljajo na posamezni obravnavi, je odvisno od jezikovnih potreb udeležencev.
The quality of the discussion at hearings clearly depends on the quality of the interpretation.
Kakovost razprave je odvisna od kakovosti tolmačenja.
The interpreters of the Court of Justice therefore prepare thoroughly for the hearings using the case-les.
Zato se tolmači Sodišča temeljito pripravijo za obravnavo, in sicer na podlagi gradiva v spisu zadeve.
The particularly demanding working conditions determined the design and technical specication of the interpretation booths in the courtrooms.
Posebno zahtevne delovne razmere so vplivale na ureditev in tehnično opremljenost kabin v razpravnih dvoranah.
Example of information given to the public on the numbering of the interpretation channels.
Služba Sodišča za tolmačenje, v kateri je 65 konferenčnih tolmačev, ki so na voljo trem sodiščem, opravi približno 40 % svojih storitev ob pomoči zunanjih tolmačev.
The interpretation service of the Court, consisting of 65 conference interpreters at the service of the three courts, also has recourse to external interpreters for approximately 40% of its work.
Primer javnosti dostopne informacije o oštevilčenju prevajalskih kanalov.
The other courtrooms.
Dostop do drugih razpravnih dvoran.
The Palais is open to visitors – legal practitioners wishing to increase their legal knowledge, law students, European citizens.
Sodna palača je odprta za obiskovalce: pravnike, ki želijo poglobiti svoje pravno znanje, študente prava in evropske državljane.
Every year, the Court receives 15000 visitors.
Sodišče sprejme vsako leto 15.000 obiskovalcev.
The Chambers of the Judges and Advocates General esting on a peristyle of 116 columns 10 metres high which recalls the Temples of antiquity, this remarkable construction places the new Palais in the Western tradition of neo-classical buildings dedicated to justice and accords perfectly with the aims inspiring its design.
Kabineti sodnikov in generalnih pravobranilcev a izjemna stavba, postavljena na stebrišču 116 stebrov, visokih 10 metrov, ki spominja na antični tempelj, umešča novo palačo v zaho- dno tradicijo neoklasicističnih stavb, namenjenih sodstvu, in popolnoma izpolnjuje zastavljene cilje.
First, as the Court of Justice wished, the Anneau enhances the original Palais by encircling it at a distance of 15 metres.
Sodišče je želelo, da obroč estetsko nadgrajuje staro sodno palačo, ki jo obkroža v razdalji 15 metrov.
And the opportunity aorded by its columns of strolling beneath its two storeys gives the public the necessary distance to appreciate the preserved structure of the 1973 Palais.
Med stebri pod njegovima nadstropjema pa lahko javnost občuduje ohranjene strukture sodne palače iz leta 1973.