natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Representation of the Court at the 23rd FIDE Congress, in Linz
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje na 23. kongresu FIDE v Linzu
Representation of the Court at the 14th Congress of the Conference of European Constitutional Courts, in Vilnius
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje na 14. konferenci evropskih ustavnih sodišč vVilni
In k Save
25. junij
Participation of the President at the reception given by the French Prime Minister, Mr F. Fillon, on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the Secretariat General for European Affairs, in Paris
Udeležba predsednika na sprejemu francoskega predsednika vlade F.
Representation of the Court at the ceremony organised on the occasion of the 90th anniversary of the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland, in Helsinki
Fillona ob 60. obletnici Generalnega sekretariata za evropske zadeve v Parizu
Participation in official functions
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje na slovesnosti ob 90. obletnici ê n skega vrhovnega upravnega sodišča v Helsinkih
Representation of the Court at the formal sitting opening the judicial year, presided over by HisMajesty the King of Spain, inMadrid
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje na slavnostni seji ob začetku sodnega leta, ki ji je predsedoval njegova visokost kralj Španije, v Madridu
Representation of the Court at the ceremony for the Opening of the Legal Year, in London
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje na slovesnosti ob začetku sodnega leta v Londonu
Representation of the Court at the ceremony for the 90th anniversary of the protection of industrial property in Poland, inWarsaw
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje na slovesnosti ob 90. obletnici varstva intelektualne lastnine na Poljskem v Varšavi
Representation of the Court at the international conference on the topic‘International courts and tribunals — The challenges ahead’, as part of the Swedish presidency of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, in cooperation with the Committee of Legal Advisers on Public International Law of the Council of Europe, in London
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje na mednarodni konferenci v Londonu o temi„Mednarodna sodišča in tribunali – pomembni izzivi“ v okviru švedskega predsedovanja Odboru ministrov Sveta Evrope v sodelovanju z Odborom pravnih svetovalcev Sveta Evrope za mednarodno javno pravo
Participation of the President and of Members of the Court at the Luxemburger Expertenforum zur Entwicklung des Gemeinschaftsrechts, in Luxembourg
Udeležba predsednika in članov Sodiščaprvestopnje na Luxemburger Expertenforum zur Entwicklung des Gemeinschaftsrechts v Luxembourgu
Representation of the Court at the autumn session of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, in NewYork
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje na jesenski seji upravnega sodišča Združenih narodov v NewYorku
Representation of the Court at the round-table discussion‘Europe without frontiers’, organised on the occasion of the state visit of the President of the Republic of Finland, M sT. Halonen, in Luxembourg
Zastopanje Sodiščaprvestopnje pri okrogli mizi„Europe without frontiers“, ki je bila organizirana ob državniškem obisku predsednice Republike Finske T. Halonen v Luxembourgu
Participation and speech of the President and of Members of the Court at the AutumnConference on European State Aid Law 2008, in Luxembourg.
Udeležba in govor predsednika in članov Sodiščaprvestopnje na Automn Conference on European State Aid Law 2008 v Luxembourgu
Meeting between its Members and the Members of the EFTA Court
Srečanje med članicami in člani Sodiščaprvestopnje in člani Sodišča AELE
Visit to the Belgian Council of State
Obisk pri belgijskem Conseil d'État
TRIBUNAL
, o za o d niSo ijo za za a
ON U L and and and
A in fr za za sodnega tajnik
P A B.
PA B.
IT T en er and te
IT T v o in za za in za za av e vir e vir e zadev pogoje d pi so re
G ON ZA L EZ
U TER M zadev
The Court of Justice may be contacted at :
Podatki Sodišča:
Court of Justice of the EuropeanCommunities
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti
Fax (Internal Services Division — Publications Section):
Faks oddelka Operativno-tehnične zadeve – Oddelekza objavo:
P re flight :
Kako do publikacijE U
Date : m );
Publikacije, ki so naprodaj:
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EuropeanCommunities
• z naročilom v knjigarni, z navedbo naslova, založnika in/ali številke ISBN;
2009 — 247 pp. — 21 × 29.7 c m
• pri pooblaščenih prodajalcih.
Catalogue number: QD-AG-09-001-EN-C
Njihovi kontaktni podatki so na voljo na spletnem mestu http://bookshop.europa.eu ali po telefaksu +352 2929-42758.
ISBN 978-92-829-0896-9 doi: 10.2862/2047
Brezplačne publikacije:
ANNUAL REPORT 2009
LETNO POROČILO 2009
Synopsis of the work of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the European Union Civil Service Tribunal
Pregled dela Sodišča, Splošnega sodišča in Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije
Court of Justice2925 LUXEMBOURGTel. +352 4303-1
Sodišče 2925 Luxembourg Tel. +352 4303-1
General Court2925 LUXEMBOURGTel. +352 4303-1
Splošno sodišče2925 Luxembourg Tel. +352 4303-1
European Union Civil Service Tribunal2925 LUXEMBOURGTel. +352 4303-1
Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije2925 Luxembourg Tel. +352 4303-1
The Court of Justice on the Internet: http://www.curia.europa.eu
Spletna stran Sodišča: http://www.curia.europa.eu
The Annual Report is also available on CD-ROM from the Press and Information Service Tel. +352 4303-2035
Letno poročilo je na voljo tudi na zgoščenki,ki jo je mogoče naročiti pri Oddelku za medije in informacije Tel. +352 4303-2035
The photographs may be reproduced only in the context of this publication.
Fotograje je dovoljeno reproducirati le kot del te publikacije.
For any other use, authorisation must be sought from the Publications Oce of the European Union.
Za uporabo v druge namene je treba prositi za dovoljenje Urad za publikacije Evropske unije.
Luxembourg: Publications Oce of the European Union, 2010
Luxembourg: Urad za publikacije Evropske unije, 2010
PRINTED ON ELEMENTAL CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHED PAPER ECF
TISKANO NA BELEM PAPIRJU, KI NE VSEBUJE ELEMENTARNEGA KLORA (ECF)
A — The Court of Justice in 2009: changes and proceedings ..................................................9
A – Razvoj in dejavnost Sodišča leta 2009 .....................................................................................9
B — Composition of the Court of Justice ....................................................................................... 53
B – Sestava Sodišča .............................................................................................................................. 49
Members of the Court of Justice ........................................................................................ 55
Člani Sodišča ............................................................................................................................. 51
Change in the composition of the Court of Justice in 2009 .................................... 71
Spremembe v sestavi Sodišča leta 2009 ......................................................................... 67
The General Court
Splošno sodišče
A — Proceedings of the General Court in 2009 ........................................................................111
A – Dejavnost Splošnega sodišča leta 2009 .............................................................................107
B — Composition of the General Court .......................................................................................145
B – Sestava Splošnega sodišča .....................................................................................................139
Members of the General Court ........................................................................................147
Člani Splošnega sodišča .....................................................................................................141
Change in the composition of the General Court in 2009 ....................................157
Sprememba v sestavi Splošnega sodišča leta 2009 .................................................151
Order of precedence ...........................................................................................................159
Protokolarna razvrstitev .....................................................................................................153
Former Members of the General Court ........................................................................161
Nekdanji člani Splošnega sodišča ..................................................................................155
C — Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the General Court ................................163
C – Sodna statistika Splošnega sodišča .....................................................................................157
Annual Report 2009
Letno poročilo 2009
The Civil Service Tribunal
Sodišče za uslužbence
A — Proceedings of the Civil Service Tribunal in 2009 ...........................................................187
A – Dejavnost Sodišča za uslužbence leta 2009 .....................................................................181
B — Composition of the Civil Service Tribunal .........................................................................197
B – Sestava Sodišča za uslužbence ..............................................................................................191
Members of the Civil Service Tribunal ..........................................................................199
Člani Sodišča za uslužbence .............................................................................................193
Change in the composition of the Civil Service Tribunal in 2009 .......................203
Spremembe v sestavi Sodišča za uslužbence leta 2009 ........................................197
Order of precedence ...........................................................................................................205
Protokolarna razvrstitev .....................................................................................................199
Former Member of the Civil Service Tribunal .............................................................207
Nekdanji član Sodišča za uslužbence ............................................................................201
C — Statistics concerning the judicial activity ..........................................................................209
C – Sodna statistika Sodišča za uslužbence .............................................................................203
B — Study visits ....................................................................................................................................225
D – Obiski ali udeležba na uradnih prireditvah .......................................................................225
The year which has just passed ended with a major event.
Preteklo leto se je končalo s pomembnim dogodkom.
On 1 December 2009 the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force after a long and complex rati¤cation procedure.
Po dolgem in zapletenem postopku ratikacije je 1. decembra 2009 začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba.
This Treaty, which is designed to endow the European Union with more e¥ective legislative and administrative structures enhancing its ability to meet the challenges of the beginning of the 21st century, brings important changes to most of the ¤elds of activity of the Court of Justice.
Ta pogodba, katere namen je zagotoviti učinkovitejšo zakonodajno in upravno strukturo Evropske unije ter zaradi katere se bo ta lažje spoprijela z izzivi začetka 21. stoletja, prinaša pomembne spremembe na večini področij dejavnosti Sodišča.
Apart from the consequences resulting from the European Union’s acquisition of legal personality and from the abandonment of its three-pillar structure, the Treaty of Lisbon introduces reforms relating both to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice and to the procedures before the three courts of which it is composed.
Tako poleg posledic tega, da je Unija pridobila pravno osebnost in da je bila opuščena njena struktura treh stebrov, Lizbonska pogodba uvaja več sprememb v zvezi s¥pristojnostmi Sodišča in postopki pred sodišči, ki ga sestavljajo.
The past year also saw a partial replacement of the membership of the Court, four of whose members departed.
Prav tako so leta 2009 zaradi delne zamenjave članov Sodišča odšli štirje njegovi člani.
The governments of the Member States were again concerned, in this partial renewal, to make the appointments without delay and to safeguard the stability of the institution as far as possible, thereby enabling it to continue smoothly in the performance of its task. The Court cannot but welcome this.
Ob imenovanjih v okviru te delne zamenjave so vlade držav članic znova upoštevale skrb za pravočasno imenovanje in ohranitev stabilnosti institucije, s tem pa ji omogočile, da je še naprej neovirano izpolnjevala svojo nalogo, kar je Sodišče zelo razveselilo.
Finally, 2009 was also marked by a very sad event, the death of Advocate General Dámaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer.
Nazadnje, leto 2009 je zaznamoval žalosten dogodek, smrt generalnega pravobranilca Dámasa Ruiz-Jaraboja Colomerja.
The impact of his death continues to be strongly felt, if only because we are deliberating, and will continue to deliberate over the coming months, in cases which have had the bene¤t of his opinions.
Pretresenost zaradi te izgube je še vedno velika, tudi zato, ker presojamo in bomo v teh mesecih še presojali zadeve, v katerih je napisal sklepne predloge.
His thinking accompanies us in our work in a very concrete manner.
Njegova razmišljanja nas pri delu zelo konkretno spremljajo.
This Annual Report provides a full record of changes a¥ecting the institution and its work in 2009.
To poročilo ponuja bralcu celotno predstavitev razvoja in dejavnosti institucije leta 2009.
As is the case every year, a substantial part of the Annual Report is devoted to brief but exhaustive accounts of the main judicial activity of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal.
Kot vsako leto je velik del letnega poročila posvečen jedrnatemu, vendar izčrpnemu pregledu sodne dejavnosti Sodišča, Splošnega sodišča in Sodišča za uslužbence.
Separate statistics for each court supplement and illustrate the analysis.
Predstavitev je dopolnjena in pojasnjena s statističnimi podatki v zvezi z vsakim sodiščem.
A — The Court of Justice in 2009: changes and proceedings
A – Razvoj in dejavnost Sodišča leta 2009
This ¤rst part of the Annual Report gives an overview of the activity of the Court of Justice of the European Union in 2009.
V prvem delu letnega poročila so strnjeno opisane dejavnosti Sodišča Evropske unije leta 2009.
It describes, ¤rst, how the institution evolved during the past year, with the emphasis on the institutional changes a¥ecting the Court of Justice and developments relating to its internal organisation and working methods (section 1).
Najprej je na kratko prikazan razvoj institucije v preteklem letu, pri čemer je poudarek na institucionalnih spremembah, ki so vplivale na Sodišče, in na spremembah njegove notranje organizacije in metod dela (oddelek 1).
It includes, second, an analysis of the statistics in relation to developments in the Court of Justice’s workload and the average duration of proceedings (section 2).
Sledi analiza statistike, ki se nanaša na razvoj obsega dela Sodišča in na povprečno trajanje postopkov (oddelek 2).
It presents, third, as each year, the main developments in the caselaw, arranged by subject matter (section 3).
Nato je tako kot vsako leto opisan poglaviten razvoj sodne prakse, razvrščene po področjih (oddelek 3).
This Treaty has made a number of amendments to the provisions of the EU Treaty and the EC Treaty concerning the Court of Justice.
Ta je spremenila več določb o Sodišču v Pogodbi EU in Pogodbi ES.
Some of these amendments ªow from the abandonment of the three-pillar structure of the European Union, from the resulting disappearance of the European Community and from the legal personality which the European Union henceforth enjoys.
Nekatere od teh sprememb izhajajo iz opustitve strukture treh stebrov Evropske unije, iz posledičnega prenehanja Evropske skupnosti in iz pravne osebnosti, ki jo ima odslej Unija.
Other amendments are more speci¤c and concern the Court of Justice directly.
Druge spremembe so bolj specične in se nanašajo neposredno na Sodišče.
Mentioning only the most important amendments, ¤rst, the judicial institution of the European Union has, since 1 December 2009, been called the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Če navedem le najpomembnejše, bi najprej poudaril, da se sodna institucija Unije od 1.¥decembra¥2009 imenuje Sodišče Evropske unije.
As before, it is composed of three courts, but henceforth called: the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal.
Kot prej je sestavljeno iz treh sodišč, ki se zdaj imenujejo Sodišče, Splošno sodišče in Sodišče za uslužbence.
The creation of further specialised tribunals remains possible but, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, any such tribunals would be created in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, that is to say by co-decision with a quali¤ed majority rather than, as hitherto, by unanimity.
Ustanovitev morebitnih drugih specializiranih sodišč je še vedno mogoča, vendar bo po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe potekala po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, in sicer po postopku soodločanja s kvalicirano večino, in ne več soglasno kot prej.
The same is true of amendments to the Statute of the Court of Justice, with the exception of the rules on the judges and advocates general and those governing the language arrangements of the Court.
Isto velja za spremembe Statuta Sodišča, razen za spremembe določb glede položaja sodnikov in generalnih pravobranilcev ter glede jezikovne ureditve Sodišča.
A signi¤cant amendment concerns the procedure for appointment of members of the Court of Justice and the General Court.
Pomembna sprememba se nanaša na postopek imenovanja članov Sodišča in Splošnega sodišča.
Judges and advocates general are henceforth appointed by a conference of representatives of the governments of the Member States after consultation of a panel responsible for giving an opinion on candidates’suitability to perform the duties of Judge and Advocate General of the Court of Justice and the General Court.
Sodniki in generalni pravobranilci so po novem imenovani na konferenci predstavnikov vlad držav članic po posvetovanju z odborom, ki je pristojen podati mnenje o ustreznosti kandidatov za opravljanje nalog sodnika in generalnega pravobranilca Sodišča in Splošnega sodišča.
This panel comprises seven persons chosen from among former members of the two Courts, members of national supreme courts and lawyers of recognised competence, one of whom is proposed by the European Parliament.
Ta odbor sestavlja sedem oseb, izbranih med nekdanjimi člani obeh sodišč, člani najvišjih nacionalnih sodišč in priznanimi pravniki, od katerih enega predlaga Evropski parlament.
So far as concerns the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice, it is to be noted that its jurisdiction extends to the law of the European Union, unless the Treaties provide otherwise.
V zvezi s pristojnostmi Sodišča je treba navesti, da se te razširjajo na pravo Evropske unije, razen če Pogodbi ne določata drugače.
Thus, the Court of Justice is conferred general jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings in the area of freedom, security and justice, as a result of the disappearance of the pillars and the repeal by the Treaty of Lisbon of Articles 35 EU and 68 EC which imposed restrictions on its jurisdiction.
Tako je Sodišče dobilo splošno pristojnost za predhodno odločanje na področju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ker strukture stebrov ni več in ker sta bila z¥Lizbonsko pogodbo črtana člena 35 EU in 68 ES, s katerima je bila omejena njegova pristojnost.
First, as regards police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to give preliminary rulings has become obligatory and is no longer subject to a declaration by each Member State recognising that jurisdiction and specifying the national courts that may request a preliminary ruling.
Na eni strani je pristojnost Sodišča za predhodno odločanje na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah postala obvezna in ni več odvisna od izjave vsake države članice o priznanju te pristojnosti in določitvi nacionalnih sodišč, ki mu lahko predložijo zadeve.
Transitional provisions nevertheless provide that that full jurisdiction will not apply until ¤ve years after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Vendar pa bo v skladu s prehodnimi določbami ta polna pristojnost začela veljati šele pet let po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe.
Also, it is signi¤cant that, now that the Treaty of Lisbon has entered into force, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union has become a binding legislative instrument with the same legal value as the Treaties (1).
Poleg tega je pomembno opozoriti, da je z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe Listina o¥temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije postala zavezujoč zakonodajni akt in pridobila enako pravno veljavo kot Pogodbi1.
Finally, in the sensitive area of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP), the Court, by way of exception, has jurisdiction (i) to monitor the delimitation of the Union’s competences and of the CFSP, the implementation of which must not a¥ect the exercise of the Union’s competences or the powers of the institutions in respect of the exercise of the exclusive and shared competences of the Union, and (ii) over actions for annulment brought against decisions providing for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons adopted by the Council in connection, for example, with combating terrorism (freezing of assets).
Nazadnje, na občutljivem področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) je Sodišče izjemoma pristojno za nadzor nad razmejitvijo med pristojnostmi Unije in SZVP, katere uresničevanje ne sme ovirati izvajanja pristojnosti Unije niti pristojnosti institucij za izvajanje izključnih in deljenih pristojnosti Unije, ter za odločanje o ničnostnih tožbah zoper sklepe o določitvi omejevalnih ukrepov proti zičnim ali pravnim osebam, ki jih sprejme Svet, na primer v¥okviru boja proti terorizmu (zamrznitev sredstev).
The Treaty of Lisbon also contains signi¤cant amendments concerning proceedings before the Courts of the European Union.
Lizbonska pogodba vsebuje tudi pomembne spremembe v zvezi s postopki pred sodišči Unije.
The most important of these include, ¤rst, the easing of the conditions for the admissibility of actions brought by individuals against regulatory acts of the institutions, bodies, oces and agencies of the European Union.
Od najbolj bistvenih naj navedem na eni strani omilitev pogojev za dopustnost tožb, ki jih vložijo posamezniki zoper predpise institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije.
In particular, natural or legal persons may henceforth bring proceedings against a regulatory act if they are directly a¥ected by it and it does not entail implementing measures.
Natančneje, zične ali pravne osebe lahko odslej vložijo tožbo zoper predpis, če se ta nanje neposredno nanaša in ne potrebuje izvedbenih ukrepov.
Consequently, they no longer have to show that they are individually concerned by an act of this type.
Tako jim ni več treba dokazati, da se ta vrsta akta nanje posamično nanaša.
Second, the Treaty of Lisbon strengthens the system of pecuniary sanctions (lump sum and/or penalty payment) in the event of non-compliance with a judgment establishing a failure to ful-¤l obligations.
Na drugi strani Lizbonska pogodba krepi mehanizem denarnih sankcij (pavšalni znesek in/ali denarna kazen) ob neizvršitvi sodbe, s katero je bila ugotovljena neizpolnitev obveznosti.
In particular, where a Member State fails to notify national measures transposing a directive to the Commission, it is henceforth possible for the Court to impose pecuniary sanctions at the stage of delivery of the initial judgment establishing a failure to ful¤l obligations.
Natančneje, Sodišču lahko odslej že v fazi prve sodbe, s katero je ugotovljena neizpolnitev obveznosti, naloži denarne sankcije, če država ni obvestila Komisije o nacionalnih ukrepih za prenos direktive.