natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to Article 2 thereof, Directive 89/48 is to apply to any national of a Member State wishing to pursue a regulated profession in a host Member State in a selfemployed capacity or as an employed person.
V členu 2 Direktive 89/48 je določeno, da ta direktiva velja za vsakega državljana države članice, ki želi opravljati reguliran poklic v državi članici gostiteljici kot samozaposlena ali zaposlena oseba.
Subparagraph (b) of the first paragraph of Article 3 of that directive provides that, where, in a host Member State, the taking up or pursuit of a regulated profession is subject to possession of a diploma, the competent authority may not, on the grounds of inadequate qualifications, refuse to authorise a national of a Member State (‘the applicant’) to take up or pursue that profession on the same conditions as apply to its own nationals, if, first, the applicant has pursued the profession in question fulltime for two years during the previous ten years in another Member State which does not regulate that profession and, second, he possesses evidence of formal qualifications fulfilling certain criteria.
Člen 3, prvi odstavek, točka (b), te direktive določa, da če je v državi članici gostiteljici za opravljanje reguliranega poklica zahtevana diploma, pristojni organi te države članice ne morejo iz naslova nezadostnih kvalifikacij zavrniti odobritve državljanu druge države članice (v nadaljevanju: prosilec), da opravlja poklic pod enakimi pogoji kot njeni državljani, če, prvič, je ta opravljal s polnim delovnim časom dve leti v zadnjih desetih letih ta poklic v drugi državi članici, ki tega poklica nima reguliranega in, drugič, ima dokazila o formalnih kvalifikacijah, ki ustrezajo določenim merilom.
Notwithstanding Article 3 thereof, Article 4 of Directive 89/48 authorises the host Member State, in certain circumstances which are set out in that article, to require
Ne glede na člen 3 Direktive 89/48, njen člen 4 državi članici gostiteljici dovoljuje, da od prosilca zahteva, pod določenimi pogoji, ki so v njej opredeljeni, da dokaže, da ima določene poklicne izku�nje, da opravi prilagoditveno obdobje v trajanju največ 3 let
2008 — CASE C-197/06 the applicant to provide evidence of professional experience of a specific duration, to complete an adaptation period not exceeding three years or to take an aptitude test (‘the compensatory measures’).
2008 – ZADEVA C-197/06 ali da opravi preizkus usposobljenosti (v nadaljevanju: izravnalni ukrepi).
Article 4 lays down a number of rules and conditions applicable to those compensatory measures.
Člen 4 tudi določa pravila in pogoje v zvezi z izravnalnimi ukrepi.
Thus, according to the third subparagraph of Article 4(1)(b) of Directive 89/48, the host Member State which imposes the compensatory measures must, in principle, leave the choice between an adaptation period and an aptitude test to the applicant.
Tako mora v skladu s členom 4(1)(b), tretji pododstavek, te direktive država članica gostiteljica, ki naloži izravnalne ukrepe, kandidatu načeloma pustiti možnost izbire med prilagoditvenim obdobjem in preizkusom usposobljenosti.
Nevertheless, as regards professions ‘whose practice requires precise knowledge of national law and in respect of which the provision of advice and/or assistance concerning national law is an essential and constant aspect of the professional activity’, the Member State may, by derogation from that principle, stipulate either an adaptation period or an aptitude test.
Za poklice, „katerih opravljanje zahteva posebna znanja s področja državne zakonodaje in pri katerih je bistven in stalni element dela svetovanje in/ali pomoč, ki zadeva državno zakonodajo“, lahko država članica gostiteljica kljub temu načelu predpi�e bodisi prilagoditveno obdobje bodisi preizkus usposobljenosti.
3604), as amended by the Programme Law of 10 February 1998 (Belgisch Staatsblad of 21 February 1998, p.
3604), kot je bil spremenjen s programskim zakonom z dne 10. februarja 1998 (Belgisch Staats­blad z dne 21. februarja 1998, str.
4889) (‘the Framework Law’), states:
4889, v nadaljevanju: okvirni zakon), določa:
‘No person may exercise in a selfemployed capacity, as a principal or as an ancillary occupation, a profession regulated pursuant to this Law or use the professional title of that profession, unless his name has been entered on the register of those exercising that profession or on the list of trainees or unless, being established abroad, he has obtained permission to exercise that profession on an ad hoc basis.
„Nihče ne sme opravljati samostojnega poklica, ki je reguliran z izvajanjem tega zakona, kot glavnega ali stranskega poklica, ali nositi poklicnega naslova, če ni na seznamu imetnikov poklicne kvalifikacije ali na seznamu pripravnikov ali ni pridobil dovoljenja, da lahko občasno opravlja ta poklic, če ima prebivali�če v tujini.
Where the regulated profession is exercised by a legal person, the preceding paragraph shall be applicable solely to one or more of those administrators, managers or active partners who personally exercise the regulated activity or who have effective control of the departments exercising it.
Če se regulirani poklic opravlja pri pravni osebi, prej�nji odstavek velja samo za upravitelje, poslovodje ali aktivne družbenike, ki osebno izvajajo regulirano dejavnost ali ki storitve, pri katerih se opravlja poklic, dejansko vodijo.
Where no such person exists, the requirement laid down in the first paragraph shall apply to an administrator, a manager or an active partner of the legal person who has been designated for that purpose.
Če takih oseb ni, velja določba odstavka 1 za v ta namen določene upravitelje, poslovodje ali aktivne družbenike pravne osebe.
With regard to estate agents, effect was given to the Framework Law by the Royal Decree of 6 September 1993 for the protection of professional titles and of the exercise of the profession of estate agent (Belgisch Staatsblad of 13 October 1993, p.
V zvezi z nepremičninskimi posredniki je bil okvirni zakon prenesen s kraljevim odlokom z dne 6. septembra 1993 o varstvu poklicnih naslovov in opravljanju poklica nepremičninskega posrednika (Belgisch Staatsblad z dne 13. oktobra 1993, str.
22447), as amended by the Royal Decree of 2 May 1996 (Belgisch Staatsblad of 8 June 1996, p. 15773).
22447), kot je bil spremenjen s kraljevim odlokom z dne 2. maja 1996 (Belgisch Staatsblad z dne 8. junija 1996, str. 15773).
Article 2 of the Royal Decree, as amended, states that:
Člen 2 navedenega kraljevega odloka, kot je bil spremenjen, določa:
‘No person may exercise in a selfemployed capacity, whether as a principal or as an ancillary occupation, the profession of estate agent or use the professional title of “estate agent authorised by the BIV”, or “trainee estate agent”, unless his name has been entered on the register of those exercising that profession or on the list of trainees maintained by [the BIV] or unless, being established abroad, he has obtained permission to exercise that profession on an ad hoc basis …’
„Nihče ne sme opravljati samostojnega poklica nepremičninskega posrednika, kot glavnega ali stranskega poklica, ali nositi poklicnega naslova ‚nepremičninski posrednik, ki je dobil licenco pri BIV‘, ali ‚nepremičninski posrednik pripravnik‘, če ni na seznamu imetnikov poklicne kvalifikacije ali na seznamu pripravnikov, ki ju vodi BIV, ali ni pridobil dovoljenja, da lahko občasno opravlja ta poklic, če ima prebivali�če v tujini. […]“
Article 6 of the Royal Decree, as amended, states:
Člen 6 tega kraljevega odloka, kot je bil spremenjen, določa:
‘Entry on the register shall be subject to the satisfactory completion of a period of training of one year.
„Za vpis na seznam imetnikov je treba zadovoljivo opraviti enoletno pripravni�tvo.
Holders of a [diploma required in another Member State of the European Community or a State party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992 (OJ 1994 L 1, p.
Nosilci [diplome, ki jo druga država članica Evropske skupnosti ali država pogodbenica Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru z dne 2. maja 1992 (UL 1994, L 1, str.
3) for the taking up or pursuit of the profession of estate agent in its territory] shall be exempted from the requirement of completing a training period.
3) predpi�e za dostop do poklica nepremičninskega posrednika na njenem ozemlju ali za opravljanje tega poklica tam] so pripravni�tva opro�čeni.
This notwithstanding, in the cases set out in Article 4[(1)(b)] of Directive [89/48], the Executive Body [of the BIV] may make the entry on the register of those exercising the profession subject, at the choice of the applicant, either to the competition of an adaptation period of one year or to an aptitude test.
Vendar lahko izvr�ilna zbornica [BIV] v primerih, na�tetih v členu 4[(1)(b)] Direktive [89/48], za to, da se lahko vpi�ejo na seznam imetnikov, zahteva, da izberejo bodisi prilagoditveno obdobje bodisi preizkus usposobljenosti.
The Law of 14 July 1991 on commercial practices and consumer information and protection (Belgisch Staatsblad of 29 August 1991, p.
Zakon z dne 14. julija 1991 o poslovnih običajih ter o obve�čanju in varstvu potro�nikov (Belgisch Staatsblad z dne 29. avgusta 1991, str.
18712) states in Article 93:
18712) v členu 93 določa:
‘Any act contrary to fair practice in commercial matters, by which a vendor adversely affects, or may adversely affect, the professional interests of one or more other vendors, shall be prohibited.’
„Vsako ravnanje, ki je v nasprotju z dobrimi poslovnimi običaji in s katerim prodajalec �koduje in bi lahko �kodil poklicnim interesom enega ali več drugih prodajalcev, je prepovedano.“
The first paragraph of Article 95 of that Law states:
Člen 95, prvi odstavek, istega zakona določa:
‘The President of the Commercial Court shall establish the existence of an act constituting a breach of the provisions of this Law and order its discontinuance, even if it is subject to criminal law.’
„Predsednik sodi�ča za gospodarske zadeve ugotovi obstoj in odredi prenehanje ravnanja, ki pomeni kr�itev določb tega zakona, tudi če se kazensko preganja.“
It is evident from the submissions made by the Netherlands Government and by the Commission of the European Communities at the hearing that, since 1 March 2001, the profession of estate agent is no longer regulated in the Netherlands.
Iz stali�č, ki sta jih predložili nizozemska vlada in Komisija Evropskih skupnosti na obravnavi, izhaja, da poklic nepremičninskega posrednika na Nizozemskem od 1. marca 2001 ni več reguliran.
The parties to the main proceedings
Stranke v postopku v glavni stvari
The CIB is a non-profit making association established under Belgian law the object of which, under its statutes, is to defend the interests of estate agents authorised in Belgium.
CIB je neprofitno združenje belgijskega prava, katerega statutarni namen je zastopati interese nepremičninskih posrednikov, ki so pridobili licenco v Belgiji.
The BIV is a legal person established under Belgian public law made up of authorised estate agents established in Belgium.
BIV je pravna oseba belgijskega javnega prava, ki združuje nepremičninske posrednike, ki so pridobili licenco v Belgiji in imajo tam prebivali�če.
He carries on business under the trading name of ‘Grensland Makelaars — onderdeel van Van Leuken vastgoed’ (‘Grensland’).
Svojo dejavnost opravlja pod trgovskim imenom „Grensland Makelaars – onderdeel van Van Leuken vastgoed“ (v nadaljevanju: Grensland).
According to the information provided by Mr Van Leuken, which it is for the national court to verify, he specialises in the sale of property situated in Belgium to clients in the Netherlands.
Glede na navedbe W. Van Leukena, ki jih mora predložitveno sodi�če preveriti, je ta specializiran za prodajo nepremičnin, ki ležijo v Belgiji, nizozemskim strankam.
He has established his office in a former customs post on the border between the Netherlands and Belgium.
Svojo pisarno ima v biv�i carinarnici na meji med Nizozemsko in Belgijo.
Prohibition proceedings
Postopek za izdajo začasne odredbe
On 11 March 2002, a summons was issued against Mr Van Leuken in an action for a prohibition order brought before the national court by the CIB and the BIV alleging that he was engaging in professional activity as an estate agent in Belgium contrary to Article 3 of the Framework Law, thereby committing an infringement of Article 93 of the Law of 14 July 1991.
CIB in BIV sta 11. marca 2002 v okviru tožbe na prenehanje pri predložitvenem sodi�ču navedli W. Van Leukena in mu očitali, da je v Belgiji opravljal poklicno dejavnost nepremičninskega posrednika in s tem kr�il člen 3 okvirnega zakona ter storil kr�itev člena 93 zakona z dne 14. julija 1991.
By decision of 10 January 2003, that action was held to be admissible and in large measure well founded.
S sodbo z dne 10. januarja 2003 je bila tožba razgla�ena za dopustno in v velikem delu za utemeljeno. W.
In the context of those prohibition proceedings, Mr Van Leuken maintained that, since his office was established in the Netherlands, he had not exercised the activity of estate agent on Belgian territory and that, although he acted as agent for the sale of immovable property situated in Belgium, he advertised solely in the Netherlands.
V okviru tega postopka za izdajo začasne odredbe je W. Van Leuken trdil, da na belgijskem ozemlju ni opravljal dejavnosti nepremičninskega posrednika, saj je bila njegova pisarna na Nizozemskem, in čeprav je deloval kot posrednik za prodajo nepremičnin v Belgiji, je to ogla�eval le na Nizozemskem.
Those arguments were rejected in the following terms:
Ti argumenti so bili zavrnjeni iz naslednjih razlogov:
‘It cannot reasonably be contested that [Mr Van Leuken], particularly since it has not been established that he uses local estate agents in the exercise of his activity
„Ni mogoče razumno izpodbijati, da [W. Van Leuken], medtem ko ni bilo ugotovljeno, da je pri svoji posredni�ki dejavnosti sodeloval z lokalnimi nepremičninskimi
VAN LEUKEN as an agent for the purpose of selling immovable property situated in Belgium, also exercises certain of his activities in Belgium, such as accompanying prospect- ive purchasers on visits to properties which are for sale.
VAN LEUKEN posredniki, da bi prodal nepremičnine v Belgiji, opravlja tudi določene dejavnosti v Belgiji, kot spremljevalec potencialnih kupcev pri ogledu nepremičnine, ki je na prodaj.
Accompanying clients can hardly be classified as secondary activity.
To [spremljanje] bi bilo težko razumeti kot podrejeno dejavnost.
In view of the nature of the professional activity [concerned], it cannot reasonably be contested that [Mr Van Leuken ] exercises in any event an essential part of his activity as an agent at the place where the immovable property is situated, regardless of the address where he has established his office or the media through which he advertises.’
Glede na naravo [zadevne] poklicne dejavnosti ni mogoče razumno izpodbijati, da [W. Van Leuken] opravlja vsaj bistveni del svoje dejavnosti posrednika na kraju, kjer je nepremičnina, ne glede na naslov, na katerem ima svojo pisarno, ali glede na medije, v katerih ogla�uje.“
Request for authorisation to exercise the profession of estate agent in Belgium on an ad hoc basis
Predlog za izdajo dovoljenja za občasno opravljanje poklica nepremičninskega posrednika v Belgiji
Although the prohibition proceedings were then pending, Mr Van Leuken submitted, on 15 May 2002, a request to the BIV for authorisation to exercise, on an ad hoc basis, the profession of estate agent on Belgian territory.
Medtem ko je postopek za izdajo začasne odredbe �e tekel, je W. Van Leuken 15. maja 2002 pri BIV vložil predlog za izdajo dovoljenja za občasno opravljanje poklica nepremičninskega posrednika na belgijskem ozemlju.
According to the BIV, the exercise of the profession of estate agent requires a good knowledge of real property law in the broad sense.
Po mnenju BIV opravljanje poklica nepremičninskega posrednika zahteva �iroko poznavanje nepremičninskega prava.
The BIV also took the view that, in all service professions, the obligation to inform is so essential that the applicant could not be exempted from it.
BIV je tudi menil, da se lahko pri vseh storitvenih poklicih obveznost obve�čanja �teje za bistveno in je vlagatelja ni mogoče oprostiti.
Moreover, the provision of advice and/or assistance concerning Belgian law is an essential and inseparable aspect of the professional activity of an estate agent.
Poleg tega naj bi bila svetovanje in/ali pomoč, ki zadevata belgijsko zakonodajo, bistveni del in nerazdružljiva z opravljanjem poklicne dejavnosti nepremičninskega posrednika.
Accordingly, the BIV considered that it was necessary to require Mr Van Leuken to take an aptitude test, rather than allowing him to choose between such a test and an adaptation period.
Zaradi tega je BIV menil, da bi bilo W. Van Leukenu nujno naložiti preizkus usposobljenosti in da mu ni mogoče dopustiti, da izbira med prilagoditvenim obdobjem in tem preizkusom.
In view of the scope of the legal subjects which it covered, Mr Van Leuken decided not to take the aptitude test.
Glede na obsežnost pravnih področij, ki jih zajema preizkus usposobljenosti, se je W. Van Leuken odločil, da se ga ne bo udeležil.
The reorganisation of Mr Van Leuken’s activities
Reorganizacija dejavnosti W. Van Leukena
In that regard, on 30 September 2003, he concluded a cooperation agreement with Ms van Asten, an estate agent established in Belgium and authorised by the BIV (‘the cooperation agreement’).
Zato je 30. septembra 2003 sklenil sporazum o sodelovanju z nepremičninsko posrednico v Belgiji, ki je dobila licenco pri BIV, gospo van Asten (v nadaljevanju: sporazum o sodelovanju).
Pursuant to that cooperation agreement, Mr Van Leuken thenceforth called on Ms van Asten, who was appointed manager by Grensland and registered in that capacity with the Chamber of Commerce, Eindhoven (Netherlands), to act as an intermediary in the sale of immovable property situated in Belgium.
V skladu s tem sporazumom se W. Van Leuken od tedaj naprej sklicuje na gospo van Asten, ki je bila imenovana za poslovodjo Grensland in vpisana kot taka pri gospodarski zbornici Eindhoven (Nizozemska), kot na posrednico pri prodaji nepremičnin v Belgiji.
All Grensland’s activities were carried out in Belgium either by Ms van Asten or by Mr Van Leuken acting on behalf of Ms van Asten and answerable to her.
Vse dejavnosti Grensland v Belgiji opravlja bodisi gospa van Asten bodisi W. Van Leuken za račun in na odgovornost gospe van Asten.
Application for a declaratory judgment
Predlog za izdajo ugotovitvene sodbe
After the decision of 10 January 2003 was served on Mr Van Leuken, the CIB and the BIV brought, on 27 May 2004, a first application for a declaratory judgment stating the penalties incurred.
Potem ko je bila sodba z dne 10. januarja 2003 vročena W. Van Leukenu, sta CIB in BIV 27. maja 2004 vložila prvi predlog za izdajo sodbe za ugotovitev nastalih kazni.
That application was declared to be well founded in the amount of EUR 14 800 by judgment of 26 November 2004.
S sodbo z dne 26. novembra 2004 je bil ta predlog razgla�en za utemeljen v vi�ini 14.800 EUR, zoper to sodbo pa se W.
Mr Van Leuken did not appeal against that judgment and has, moreover, paid the amount in question.
Van Leuken ni pritožil, ampak je ta znesek plačal.
The CIB and the BIV base themselves, in that regard, on the advertising relating to the sale of more than 50 residential properties and other immovable property in Belgium appearing on the website www.grensland.nl.
CIB in BIV sta se pri tem oprla na ogla�evanje na spletni strani www.grensland.nl v zvezi s prodajo več kot 50 stanovanj in drugih nepremičnin v Belgiji.
They refer also to the statement of a Belgian process-server declaring that Mr Van Leuken guided a prospective purchaser around immovable property situated in Belgium and made technical comments on its construction.
Sklicevala sta se tudi na zapisnik belgijskega sodnega izvr�itelja, ki je ugotovil, da je W. Van Leuken na kraju samem vodil potencialnega kupca nepremičnine v Belgiji in dajal tehnične komentarje v zvezi z gradnjo te nepremičnine.
During that visit, Mr Van Leuken handed the prospective purchasers a brochure containing information on the property in question and stating that activities governed by Belgian law are carried out by the manager, Ms van Asten, who is authorised by the BIV.
Na tem ogledu je W. Van Leuken potencialnim kupcem dal bro�uro z informacijami o navedeni nepremičnini, v kateri je bilo navedeno, da dejavnosti v skladu z belgijskim pravom opravlja kot posrednica poslovodja gospa van Asten, ki ji je licenco podelil BIV.
That information also appears on Grensland’s website.
Ta podatek je naveden tudi na spletni strani Grensland.
The national court accordingly seeks to determine, in those circumstances, whether an estate agent who is established in the Netherlands and who offers for sale immovable property situated in Belgium infringes the prohibition laid down by the decision of 10 January 2003 if he organises his activity in the form of cooperation with a Belgian estate agent authorised by the BIV.
Predložitveno sodi�če se spra�uje, ali v teh okoli�činah nepremičninski posrednik s sedežem na Nizozemskem, ki ponuja nepremičnine v Belgiji, kr�i začasno odredbo o prenehanju iz sodbe z dne 10. januarja 2003, če organizira svojo dejavnost v obliki sodelovanja z nepremičninskim posrednikom, ki mu je licenco podelil BIV.
Against that background, the Voorzitter van de rechtbank van koophandel te Hasselt decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
V teh okoli�činah je voorzitter van de rechtbank van koophandel te Hasselt prekinil odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložil naslednji vpra�anji:
Must Articles 3 and 4 of Directive 89/48 … be interpreted as meaning that an estate agent who is established in the Netherlands and organises agency activities in Belgium in respect of immovable property is in every case obliged to comply with the conditions laid down by the Belgian legislature pursuant to the aforementioned directive …, notwithstanding any cooperation agreement with an estate agent who is authorised in Belgium and provides intermediary services in regard to activities governed by Belgian law?
Ali je treba člena 3 in 4 Direktive 89/48 […] razlagati tako, da nepremičninskemu posredniku s sedežem na Nizozemskem, ki v Belgiji izvaja dejavnosti nepremičninskega posredovanja, ni treba več izpolnjevati pogojev, ki jih je določil belgijski zakonodajalec na podlagi navedene direktive […], če sklene sporazum o sodelovanju z nepremičninskim posrednikom s sedežem v Belgiji, ki mu je licenco podelil [BIV], in je organiziran tako, da (i) bi se za dejavnosti v Belgiji potro�nik lahko vedno obrnil na tega nepremičninskega posrednika, ki je pridobil licenco v Belgiji, in (ii) bi to sodelovanje bilo oznanjeno v oglasu, torej z navedbo sodelovanja tega nepremičninskega posrednika, ki je dobil licenco v Belgiji pri BIV, kadar se dejavnosti izvajajo po belgijskem pravu; ali pa je treba člena 3 in 4 Direktive 89/48 […] razlagati tako, da mora nepremičninski posrednik s sedežem na Nizozemskem, ki v Belgiji opravlja dejavnosti nepremičninskega posredovanja, v vsakem primeru izpolnjevati pogoje, ki jih je določil belgijski zakonodajalec na podlagi navedene direktive […], brez upo�tevanja morebitnega sporazuma o sodelovanju, [ki ga je sklenil ta nepremičninski posrednik] z nepremičninskim posrednikom, ki ima licenco v Belgiji in ki sodeluje pri dejavnostih, ki se opravljajo po belgijskem pravu[?]