natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On 13 May 2004, the city of Madrid published an invitation to comment, within a period of 20 days, on a total of five projects to improve and widen the M-30 road within the urban area.
Mesto Madrid je 13. maja 2004 objavilo poziv k oddaji stali�č v roku dvajsetih dni glede skupno petih projektov obnove in �iritve ceste M-30 na mestnem območju.
The public also had 45 days within which to comment in a further development consent procedure under water legislation.
V okviru nadaljnjega vodnopravnega postopka izdaje soglasja je imela javnost ponovno možnost v petin�tiridesetih dneh izraziti stali�ča.
On 24 January 2005, the city published its decision of 17 January 2005, by which it had given consent to the projects.
Mesto je 24. januarja 2005 objavilo svojo odločbo z dne 17. januarja 2005, s katero je projekte dovolilo.
The non-governmental organisation Ecologistas en Acción-CODA brought an action against that consent.
Zoper to soglasje je nevladna organizacija Ecologistas en Acción-CODA vložila tožbo.
4 — After amendment that definition now states:‘An express road is a road reserved for motor traffic accessible from interchanges or controlled junctions only and which, (i) Prohibits stopping and parking on the running carriageway(s) (ii) Does not cross at level with any railway or tramway track, or footpath.’
4 – Po spremembi je pojem danes opredeljen tako: „Hitra cesta je cesta, določena za avtomobilski promet, na katero je možen uvoz samo prek deteljic ali križi�č, na katerih je promet reguliran,i) na kateri se je prepovedano zaustaviti ali stati, inii) ki se v nivoju ne križa z drugo cesto, železni�ko ali tramvajsko progo ali pe�potjo.“ iii) je posebej označena kot avtocesta.
The referring court describes the subjectmatter of these proceedings as follows: arising from [the EIA Directive] applicable to urban road projects, having regard to their nature, size and effect on densely populated areas or on landscapes of historical, cultural or archaeological significance?
Predložitveno sodi�če opisuje predmet tega postopka tako: uporabljajo za projekte del na mestnih cestah glede na vrsto in obseg projekta, njegov vpliv na gosto poseljena območja in na območja zgodovinskega, kulturnega ali arheolo�kega pomena?
(2) Are the procedural requirements relating to environmental impact assessments arising from [the EIA Directive] applicable to the projects which form the subjectmatter of these administrative appeal proceedings, having regard to their nature, the nature of the road on which they are to be carried out, their characteristics, size, effect on the surrounding area, density of population, budget and the possible splitting up of a larger project which contemplates similar works on the same road?
Ali se pravila postopka presoje vplivov na okolje, določena v Direktivi o PVO, uporabljajo za projekte, ki so predmet tega upravnega spora, glede na njihovo vrsto in vrsto ceste, na kateri se načrtuje njihova izvedba, značilnosti, razsežnosti, vpliv na okolico, gostoto poseljenosti, proračun in morebitno drobitev celovitega projekta o podobnih delih na isti cesti?
‘In effect what is before the court is a challenge to an administrative measure which approves only five of the sub-projects or specific restructuring works on the road network and surrounding area of the M-30 which, taken together, entail a vast and highly complex civil engineering operation which corresponds to a single overall project to improve and refurbish virtually the whole of the Madrid ring road which is known and referred to as the “Madrid calle 30” project…, which the City Council has split up in this way and treated as 15 distinct and independent projects.
„Gre za izpodbijanje upravnega akta, s katerim se sicer dovoljuje le pet delnih projektov oz. posebnih ukrepov za preoblikovanje trase in območja, čez katero teče cesta M-30, ki pa kot celota tvorijo veliko in zelo zapleteno nizko gradnjo, ki pomeni obsežen in enoten projekt izbolj�ave in obnove skoraj celotne madridske obvoznice, ki je poimenovan in predstavljen kot „Madrid calle 30“ […] in ki ga je mestni svet razdelil ter obravnaval v obliki petnajstih različnih in neodvisnih projektov.
Thus all but one of the different sections constitute less than the 5 kilometres of alteration or rehabilitation work on any existing road referred to in epigraph 95 of Annex 2 to Ley 2/2002, although the project as a whole far exceeds these dimensions.
Tako se pri nobenem posameznem odseku ceste, z izjemo enega, ne spreminja ali obnavlja trasa, dalj�a od petih kilometrov, v smislu točke 95 druge priloge k zakonu 2/2002, čeprav projekt v celoti to dolžino daleč presega.
It is estimated that this project for the total overhaul and extension of the M-30 will mean an increase in traffic on the motorway of almost 25% and it involves a wide range of different works in the surrounding urban area.’
Zaradi celotnega projekta obnove in �iritve ceste M-30 bi se po ocenah promet na tej cesti povečal za približno 25 % in v mestnem okolju bi bilo treba sprejeti najrazličnej�e ukrepe.“
(3) Are the criteria set out in Case C-332/04 5Commission v Spain, and specifically
Ali se merila, ki jih je določilo Sodi�če v sodbi Komisija proti Španiji (C-332/04) 5,
In order for a ruling to be given on the action, the Court has been asked the following questions: those contained in paragraphs 69 to 88 of the judgment, applicable to the projects which are the subjectmatter of these proceedings, having regard to their nature, the nature of the road on which
Da bi lahko odločilo o tožbi, je predložitveno sodi�če prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo ta vpra�anja: in sicer v točkah od 69 do 88 te sodbe, uporabljajo za projekte, ki so predmet tega postopka, glede na njihovo vrsto in vrsto ceste, na kateri se načrtuje njihova izvedba, značilnosti, razsežnosti, vpliv na
IV — Legal assessment they are to be carried out, their characteristics, size, effect on the surrounding area, budget and the possible splitting up of a larger project which contemplates similar works on the same road, such that there was a requirement to submit them to the prescribed environmental impact assessment procedure?
IV – Pravna presoja okolico, proračun in morebitno drobitev celovitega projekta o podobnih delih na isti cesti, in ali se zato glede teh projektov mora izvesti postopek presoje vplivov na okolje?
A — The first three questions — urban road construction projects
A – Prva tri vprašanja – projekti del na mestnih cestah
The Court should consider the first three questions together, as they are essentially identical.
Sodi�če bi moralo prva tri vpra�anja obravnavati skupaj, ker imajo v bistvu enako vsebino.
The referring court would like to ascertain the conditions under which urban road construction projects, in particular the five projects to be examined by it, are to be made subject to an environmental impact assessment.
Predložitveno sodi�če želi izvedeti, pod katerimi pogoji je glede projektov del na mestnih cestah, predvsem glede petih projektov, o katerih mora odločiti, treba izvesti postopek presoje vplivov na okolje.
With reference to the judgment in Case C-332/04, 6 it highlights certain characteristics of the projects:
Ob sklicevanju na sodbo v zadevi C-322/04 6posebej poudarja nekatere lastnosti projektov:
(4) Do the relevant administrative records and, specifically, the studies and reports contained therein, demonstrate that the Spanish authorities have, in practice, complied with the obligations arising from [the EIA Directive] relating to the environmental assessment of the projects which are the subjectmatter of these proceedings, even if the project was not formally made subject to the prescribed environmental assessment procedure set out in the directive?’
Ali so glede na to, kar izhaja iz upravnega spisa in natančneje iz vanj vključenih �tudij in poročil, �panske oblasti v zvezi s projekti, ki so predmet tega postopka, v praksi spo�tovale obveznosti iz Direktive o PVO glede presoje vplivov na okolje, čeprav se za te projekte formalno ni uporabil postopek presoje vplivov na okolje, ki ga določa navedena direktiva?“
— the nature and size of the project, in particular the nature of the road, its characteristics and its size,
– vrsto in obseg projekta, predvsem strukturo in vrsto ceste, njene značilnosti in razsežnost,
— the effect on densely populated areas or on landscapes of historical, cultural or archaeological significance,
– vplive na gosto poseljena območja in na območja zgodovinskega, kulturnega ali arheolo�kega pomena,
— the budget, and
– proračun ter
The applicant in the main proceedings, the non-governmental organisation Ecologistas en Acción-CODA, the defendant, the municipality of Madrid, Italy and the Commission took part in the written procedure, whilst only the municipality of Madrid and the Commission took part in the oral procedure on 2 April 2008.
Pisnega postopka so se udeležile nevladna organizacija Ecologistas en Acción-CODA, ki je v postopku v glavni stvari tožeča stranka, tožena stranka madridska mestna uprava, Italija in Komisija, ustne obravnave 2. aprila 2008 pa le mestna uprava in Komisija.
— the possible splitting up of a larger project which contemplates similar works on the same road.
– morebitno drobitev celovitega projekta o podobnih delih na isti cesti.
In my view, that is an incorrect interpretation of the EIA Directive.
Ta razlaga Direktive o PVO je po mojem mnenju napačna.
It is true that the EIA Directive does not expressly mention ‘urban roads’ as such.
Drži sicer, da Direktiva o PVO „mestnih cest“ izrecno ne omenja.
However, point (7)(b) and (c) of Annex I and point (10)(e) of Annex II refer to motorways, express roads and roads.
Vendar pa so v Prilogi I, točka 7(b) in (c), ter Prilogi II, točka 10(e), navedene avtoceste, hitre ceste in ceste.
As the Commission in particular stresses, these are Communitylaw concepts which must be given an autonomous interpretation.
Kot poudarja predvsem Komisija, gre pri tem za pojme prava Skupnosti, ki jih je treba razlagati avtonomno.
From the perspective of Community law, it would be quite alien to exclude urban roads from the three abovementioned types of roads.
Z vidika prava Skupnosti ne bi bilo smiselno mestne ceste izključiti iz treh navedenih vrst cest.
In principle all those roads may also occur within urban areas and have significant effects on the environment there.
Načeloma so lahko namreč vse navedene ceste tudi v mestih in tam pomembno vplivajo na okolje.
As the Italian Government rightly argues, in answering these questions, it is not possible to examine the compatibility of Spanish law with the EIA Directive.
Kot italijanska vlada pravilno navaja, pri odgovoru na ta vpra�anja ni mogoče presojati skladnosti �panske zakonodaje z Direktivo o PVO.
The Court may none the less provide the national court with all the criteria of interpretation of Community law which may enable the national court to assess that compatibility of a national provision with Community law for the purposes of deciding the case before it. 7
Sodi�če pa lahko predložitvenemu sodi�ču da vse napotke za razlago prava Skupnosti, ki mu bodo omogočila presojo vpra�anja združljivosti nacionalne zakonodaje s pravom Skupnosti pri odločanju v postopku, ki je pri tem sodi�ču v teku. 7
The significance of the European Agreement on Main International Traffic Arteries of 15 November 1975 for the interpretation of the EIA Directive
Pomen Evropskega sporazuma o glavnih mednarodnih prometnih žilah z dne 15. novembra 1975 za razlago Direktive o PVO
Exclusion of urban roads from the environmental impact assessment
Izvzetje mestnih cest iz presoje vplivov na okolje
Motorways and express roads are not defined under point 7(b) of Annex I to the EIA Directive, but recourse may be had to the European Agreement on Main International Traffic Arteries of 15 November 1975.
Avtoceste in hitre ceste v Prilogi I, točka 7(b), k Direktivi o PVO niso opredeljene, vendar pa se lahko uporabi Evropski sporazum o glavnih mednarodnih prometnih žilah z dne 15. novembra 1975.
In the case of express roads the application of the Agreement follows from an express reference in point 7(b) of Annex I to the EIA Directive.
Glede hitrih cest uporaba Sporazuma izhaja iz izrecnega sklicevanja v Prilogi I, točka 7(b), k Direktivi o PVO.
8 Although point 7(b) of Annex I to the EIA Directive does not refer to the Agreement for the definition of motorway, its definition can also be used to ensure a uniform interpretation in all the Member States.
8Čeprav Priloga I, točka 7(b), k Direktivi o PVO glede pojma avtoceste ne vsebuje sklicevanja na Sporazum, bi bilo treba zaradi zagotovitve enotne razlage v vseh državah članicah prav tako uporabiti njegovo opredelitev.
The municipality of Madrid takes the view that the EIA Directive does not cover the contested projects.
Madridska mestna uprava meni, da Direktiva o PVO ne zajema projektov, ki so predmet spora.
Those projects relate to an urban road.
Ti se nana�ajo na mestno cesto.
The Spanish legislature and the Spanish authorities and courts considered that urban roads do not fall within the scope of the EIA Directive because they are not mentioned in the annexes to the directive.
Španski zakonodajalec in �panski organi ter sodi�ča izhajajo iz predpostavke, da mestne ceste ne spadajo na področje uporabe Direktive o PVO, ker niso navedene v prilogah k tej direktivi.
7 — See, for example, Case C-107/97 Rombi and Arkopharma [2000] ECR I-3367, paragraph 29.
7 – Glej sodbo z dne 18. maja 2000 v zadevi Rombi in Arkopharma (C-107/97, Recueil, str. I-3367, točka 29).
8 — With regard to such a reference to the definition of airports, see Case C-2/07 Abraham and Others [2008] ECR I-1197, paragraph 35.
8 – V zvezi s podobnim sklicevanjem na opredelitev letali�č glej sodbo z dne 28. februarja 2008 v zadevi Abraham in drugi (C-2/07, ZOdl., str. I-1197, točka 35).
However, both the wording of the reference with regard to express roads and the objective of the EIA Directive and the Agreement would suggest that the exclusion of built-up areas from the application of Annex II to the Agreement should not be taken into consideration for the definition of express road and motorway within the meaning of the EIA Directive.
Besedilo sklicevanja glede hitrih cest in namen Direktive o PVO ter Sporazuma pa nasprotujeta temu, da bi se pri opredelitvi hitrih cest in avtocest v smislu Direktive o PVO upo�tevala izključitev naseljenih območij s področja uporabe Priloge II k Sporazumu.
Under Article 17(3), the Agreement is authentic in the Community languages of English and French, and in Russian, which is of no further relevance in this case.
Sporazum je v skladu z njegovim členom 17(3) zavezujoč v dveh jezikih Skupnosti, in sicer angle�čini in franco�čini, ter – kar tu ni več bistveno – v ru�čini.
In order to understand the reference to express roads in the EIA Directive, recourse should be had to the English version of the directive and the Agreement, as both use the expression ‘express roads’.
Za razumevanje sklicevanja Direktive o PVO v zvezi s hitrimi cestami je treba uporabiti angle�ko različico Direktive in Sporazuma, ker je v obeh enotno uporabljen izraz „Express roads“.
On the other hand, the French version of the directive wrongly uses the expression ‘voies rapides’ rather than the expression ‘routes express’ from the Agreement.
Nasprotno se v francoski različici Direktive namesto izraza „Routes express“ iz Sporazuma napačno uporablja izraz „voies rapides“.
The footnote for the definition of ‘express road’ in point 7(b) of Annex I to the EIA Directive does not make a general reference to express roads within the meaning of the Agreement, but to ‘a road which complies with the definition’ laid down in the Agreement.
Opomba pri pojmu „hitre ceste“ v Prilogi I, točka 7(b), k Direktivi o PVO ni sklicevanje na hitre ceste na splo�no v smislu Sporazuma, temveč na „cesto, ki se ujema z opredelitvijo“ v Sporazumu.
It is not therefore a question of transferring the scope of the Agreement; the Community legislature merely employed a definition developed in a different context.
Zato ne gre za prenos področja uporabe Sporazuma, temveč je zakonodajalec Skupnosti le uporabil opredelitev, ki je bila razvita v drugem okviru.
That definition does not exclude built-up areas.
V tej opredelitvi naseljena območja niso izključena.
In the case of the application of the definition of motorway, for which no express provision is made, there is even less reason to exclude urban roads.
Pri prevzemu opredelitve avtocest, ki ni izrecno predviden, a fortiori ne obstaja razlog za izvzetje mestnih cest.
Because the definition of express road has now been amended, the question arises whether the amended or the original version of the definition should be used in interpreting the EIA Directive.
Ker se je opredelitev hitrih cest v vmesnem času spremenila, se postavlja vpra�anje, ali je treba za razlago Direktive o PVO uporabiti spremenjeno ali izvirno različico opredelitve.
The wording of the reference, which does not state that subsequent amendments are to be taken into consideration, would suggest that the original version should be used.
Izvirna različica bi se uporabila že na podlagi besedila sklicevanja, iz katerega ne izhaja, naj se upo�tevajo kasnej�e spremembe.
In addition, the Community and some Member States are not party to the Agreement.
Poleg tega Skupnost in nekatere države članice niso podpisnice Sporazuma.
Where there is a reference to the version applicable at a certain time, they would have to accept amendments without being able to influence them directly.
Pri sklicevanju na vsakokrat veljavno različico bi morale upo�tevati spremembe, ne da bi lahko nanje neposredno vplivale.
Only the original and not the amended version of the definition is therefore to be used.
Zato je treba uporabiti le izvirno različico opredelitve in ne spremenjene.
Furthermore, in interpreting the reference, as with other matters of interpretation in connection with the EIA Directive, account should be taken of its objective.
Poleg tega je treba pri razlagi sklicevanja, tako kot pri drugih vpra�anjih razlage v zvezi z Direktivo o PVO, upo�tevati njen namen. 9
9Under Article 2(1) its fundamental object- ive is that, before consent is given, projects likely to have significant effects on the environment by virtue, inter alia, of their
V skladu s členom 2(1) je njen namen, da so projekti, ki bodo verjetno pomembno vplivali na okolje, predvsem zaradi svoje vrste,
With regard to the interpretation of a reference to the definition of airports, see my Opinion in Case C-2/07 Abraham and Others [2007], point 45.
V zvezi z razlago sklicevanja na opredelitev letali�č glej moje sklepne predloge z dne 29. novembra 2007 v zadevi Abraham in drugi (C-2/07, ZOdl., str. I-1197, točka 45).
In the view of the municipality of Madrid, urban roads are not express roads or motorways within the meaning of the Agreement.
Po stali�ču madridske mestne uprave mestne ceste niso hitre ceste ali avtoceste v smislu Sporazuma.
It bases its view on the general rules laid down in section I.1 of Annex II to the Agreement, under which the provisions of the Annex do not apply to built-up areas.
Sklicuje se na splo�no določbo Priloge II, točka I.1, k Sporazumu, v skladu s katero se določbe te priloge ne nana�ajo na naseljena območja.
This relates in particular to the definitions of express road and motorway in sections II.2 and II.3 of that Annex.
To posebej velja za opredelitvi hitrih cest in avtocest v točkah II.2 in II.3 te priloge.
The definition of express road and motorway nature, size or location should be made subject to an assessment with regard to their effects. 10
Opredelitev hitrih cest in avtocest velikosti ali lokacije, pred izdajo soglasja za izvedbo predmet presoje njihovih vplivov. 10
Accordingly, under Annex II, section II.3 of the Agreement, an express road is a road reserved for motor traffic accessible only from interchanges or controlled junctions and on which, in particular, stopping and parking are prohibited on the running carriageway.
V skladu s Prilogo II, točka II.3, k Sporazumu gre v primeru hitrih cest torej za ceste, določene za avtomobilski promet, na katere je mogoč uvoz samo prek deteljic ali križi�č, na katerih je promet reguliran, in na katerih se je prepovedano zaustaviti ali stati.
It is irrelevant whether such roads run within urban areas.
Nepomembno je, ali te ceste potekajo znotraj mest.
Many environmental effects of roads can occur both within and outside urban areas.
Ceste imajo lahko veliko vplivov na okolje v mestih in zunaj njih.
Furthermore, urban areas are particularly sensitive places for the construction of roads because of the population density, existing environmental pollution, but also any places of historical, cultural or archaeological significance.
Poleg tega so mesta predvsem zaradi gostote poseljenosti, obstoječih vplivov na okolje, pa tudi glede na morebitna območja zgodovinskega, kulturnega ali arheolo�kega pomena, posebej občutljivi kraji za gradnjo cest.
It is therefore consistent with the aim of the EIA Directive if it covers urban roads. 11
Zato je v skladu z namenom Direktive o PVO, da ta obsega mestne ceste. 11
Annex II, section II.3 of the Agreement defines a motorway as a road specially designed and built for motor traffic, which does not serve properties bordering on it.
V Prilogi II, točka II.3, k Sporazumu je avtocesta opredeljena kot cesta, ki je projektirana in zgrajena izključno za promet motornih vozil in se ne uporablja za druge namene.
It is generally provided with separate carriageways for the two directions of traffic, separated from each other by a dividing strip not intended for traffic or, exceptionally, by other means.
Načeloma ima ločene vozne pasove za promet v dveh nasprotnih smereh, ki so med seboj fizično ločeni z ločilnim pasom, ki ni namenjen prometu, ali izjemoma z drugimi sredstvi.
In addition, it does not cross at level with any road, railway or tramway track, or footpath.
Prav tako se v nivoju ne križa z drugo cesto, železni�ko ali tramvajsko progo ali pe�potjo.
This conclusion is also suggested by the parallelism of the EIA Directive and the Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context (Espoo, 1991).
Tak sklep je potrjen tudi z vzporednostjo Direktive o PVO s Konvencijo o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje (Espoo, 1991).
The Community is a contracting party to that Convention 12and the EIA Dir ective seeks to implement it, as is shown in par -ticular by recital 13 in the preamble to Dir -ective 97/11.
Skupnost je pogodbena stranka te konvencije 12in Direktiva o PVO je namenjena njenemu prenosu, kar izhaja predvsem iz uvodne izjave 13 Direktive 97/11.
For the definition of express road and motorway the Espoo Convention uses the original definitions laid down in the European Agreement on Main International Traffic Arteries, and does not preclude an application to urban roads.
V konvenciji iz Espooja sta kot opredelitev hitrih cest in avtocest uporabljeni izvirni opredelitvi iz Evropskega sporazuma o glavnih mednarodnih prometnih žilah, ne da bi bila uporaba za mestne ceste izključena.
10 — Case C-486/04 Commission v Italy (cited in footnote 9, paragraph 36).
10 – Sodba Komisija proti Italiji (navedena v opombi 9, točka 36).
See also Case C-287/98 Linster [2000] ECR I-6917, paragraphs 49 and 52.
Glej tudi sodbo z dne 19. septembra 2000 v zadevi Linster (C-287/98, Recueil, str. I-6917, točki 49 in 52).
11 — With regard to road construction projects, see Case C-332/04 Commission v Spain (cited in footnote 5, paragraph 81).
11 – V zvezi s projekti gradnje v mestih glej sodbo Komisija proti Španiji (navedena v opombi 5, točka 81).
12 — Council Decision of 15 October 1996 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Community, of the Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context; not published.
12 – Sklep Sveta z dne 15. oktobra 1996 o sklenitvi Konvencije o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje v imenu Skupnosti, neobjavljen.
Lastly, the Agreement requires that the road is specially sign-posted as a motorway.
V Sporazumu je končno določeno, da mora biti cesta posebej označena kot avtocesta.