natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
INFORMATION ON UNPUBLISHED DECISIONS the annulment of Decision R 552/2004-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 23 February 2005 annulling the decision of the Opposition Division which rejected the opposition brought by the proprietor of the Community word mark ‘NOMAFOAM’ for goods in Classes 11, 19, 20, 27 and 28.
INFORMATIONS SUR LES DÉCISIONS NON PUBLIÉES proizvode iz razreda 20 proti odločbi R 552/2004-1 prvega odbora za pritožbe Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (UUNT) z dne 23. februarja 2005, s katero je ta razveljavil odločbo oddelka za ugovore, s katero je ta zavrnil ugovor, ki ga je vložil imetnik besedne znamke Skupnosti „NOMAFOAM“ za proizvode iz razredov 11, 19, 20, 27 in 28.
Orders Armacell Enterprise GmbH to pay the costs.
Družbi Armacell Enterprise GmbH se naloži plačilo stro�kov.
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 September 2008 — Correia de Matos v Parliament
Sklep Sodišča (osmi senat) z dne 24. septembra 2008 – Correia de Matos proti Parlamentu
(Case C-502/06 P-INT)
(Zadeva C-502/06 P-INT)
(Procedure — Application for interpretation — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
„Postopek — Vpra�anje glede razlage — Nepristojnost Sodi�ča“
Procedure — Interpretation of a judgment — Application for the interpretation of an order — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 43; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 102) (see paras 6-8)
Postopek — Razlaga sodbe — Vprašanje glede razlage Sklepa — Nepristojnost Sodišča (Statut Sodišča, člen 43; Poslovnik Sodišča, člen 102) (Glej točke od 6 do 8.)
Application for the interpretation of the order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 November 2007 in Case C-502/06 P Correia de Matos v Parliament.
Vpra�anje glede razlage Sklepa Sodi�ča (osmi senat) z dne 21. novembra 2007 v zadevi C-502/06 P, Carlos Correia de Matos proti Evropskemu parlamentu.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities manifestly does not have jurisdiction to provide a reply to the application for interpretation made by Mr Correia de Matos;
Sodi�če Evropskih skupnosti je očitno nepristojno za odgovor na vpra�anje glede razlage, ki ga je vložil C. Correia de Matos.
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 September 2008 — Commission v Italy
Sodba Sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 25. septembra 2008 – Komisija proti Italiji
(Case C-368/07)
(Zadeva C-368/07)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2000/59/EC — Port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues — Failure to develop and implement waste reception and handling plans for all ports)
„Neizpolnitev obveznosti države — Direktiva 2000/59/ES — Pristani�ke zmogljivosti za sprejem ladijskih odpadkov in ostankov tovora — Nepriprava in neizvedba načrta za sprejem odpadkov in ravnanje z njimi za vsa pristani�ča“
Actions for failure to fulfil obligations — Examination of the merits by the Court — Situation to be taken into consideration — Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 12)
Tožba zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti — Preizkus utemeljenosti, ki ga opravi Sodišče — Upoštevni položaj — Stanje po izteku roka, določenega v obrazloženem mnenju (člen 226 ES) (Glej točko 12.)
Acts of the institutions — Directives — Implementation by Member States — Need to ensure that directives are effective (Art. 249 EC) (see para. 16)
Akti institucij — Direktive — Prenos, ki ga opravijo države članice — Zahteva po zagotovitvi učinkovitosti direktiv (člen 249 ES) (Glej točko 16.)
Environment — Waste — Directive 2000/59 — Ship-generated waste and cargo residues (European Parliament and Council Directive 2000/59, Arts 3(b), 5(1) and 16(1)) (see paras 17-22, operative part)
Okolje — Odpadki — Direktiva 2000/59 — Ladijski odpadki in ostanki tovora (Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2000/59, členi 3(b), 5(1) in 16(1)) (Glej točke od 17 do 22 in izrek.)
Failure of Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have adopted, within the prescribed period, all the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (OJ 2000 L 332, p. 81).
Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Nesprejetje predpisov, potrebnih za uskladitev z Direktivo 2000/59/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. novembra 2000 o pristani�kih zmogljivostih za sprejem ladijskih odpadkov in ostankov tovora (UL L 332, str. 81), v predvidenem roku.
Declares that, by failing to prepare and adopt waste reception and handling plans for every Italian port, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 5(1) and 16(1) of Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues;
Italijanska republika, s tem da ni za vsako italijansko pristani�če izdelala in sprejela načrta za sprejem in ravnanje z odpadki, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz členov 5(1) in 16(1) Direktive 2000/59/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. novembra 2000 o pristani�kih zmogljivostih za sprejem ladijskih odpadkov in ostankov tovora.
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 September 2008 — Commission v Czech Republic
Sodba Sodišča (sedmi senat) z dne 25. septembra 2008 – Komisija proti Češki
(Case C-87/08)
(Zadeva C-87/08)
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/73/EC — Measures implementing Directive 2004/39/EC — Organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms — Failure to adopt within the prescribed period)
„Neizpolnitev obveznosti države — Direktiva 2006/73/ES — Ukrepi za izvajanje Direktive 2004/39/ES — Organizacijske zahteve in pogoji poslovanja investicijskih družb — Neopravljen prenos v predpisanem roku“
Actions for failure to fulfil obligations — Examination of the merits by the Court — Situation to be taken into consideration — Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 226 EC) (see para. 9)
Tožba zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti — Preizkus utemeljenosti, ki ga opravi Sodišče — Upoštevni položaj — Stanje po izteku roka, določenega v obrazloženem mnenju (člen 226 ES) (Glej točko 9.)
Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to transpose Commission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that directive (OJ 2006 L 241, p. 26).
Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Neopravljen prenos Direktive Komisije 2006/73/ES z dne 10. avgusta 2006 o izvajanju Direktive 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z organizacijskimi zahtevami in pogoji poslovanja investicijskih družb ter opredeljenimi izrazi za namene navedene direktive (UL L 241, str. 26).
Declares that, by failing to adopt all such laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2006/73/EC of 10 August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC of the European
Če�ka republika, s tem da ni sprejela vseh zakonov in drugih predpisov, potrebnih za uskladitev z Direktivo Komisije 2006/73/ES z dne 10. avgusta
Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that directive, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53(1) of that directive;
2006 o izvajanju Direktive 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta v zvezi z organizacijskimi zahtevami in pogoji poslovanja investicijskih družb ter opredeljenimi izrazi za namene navedene direktive, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz člena 53(1) te direktive.
Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs.
Če�ki republiki se naloži plačilo stro�kov.
Report 2008-8/9 (B)
Zvezek 2008 – 8/9 (B)
Catalogue number: QD-AB-08-08B-EN-C
Katalo�ka �tevilka: QD-AB-08-08B-SL-C
COURT OF JUSTICEOF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
SODIŠČE EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI
ANNUAL REPORT2004
LETNO POROČILO2004
Synopsis of the Workof the Court of Justiceand the Courtof First Instanceof the European Communities
Pregled dejavnosti Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti
Court of Justice of the European Communities L-2925 Luxembourg Telephone: (352) 43 03-1Telex (Registry): 2510 CURIA LUTelefax (Court): (352) 43 03-2600Telefax (Information Service): (352) 43 03-2500
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti L-2925 Luxembourg Telefon: (352) 43 03-1Telex sodnega tajništva: 2510 CURIA LUFaks Sodišča: (352) 43 03-2600Faks oddelka Mediji in informacije: (352) 43 03-2500
Court of First Instance of the European Communities L-2925 Luxembourg Telephone: (352) 43 03-1Telefax (Court): (352) 43 03-2100
Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti L-2925 Luxembourg Telefon: (352) 43 03-1Faks Sodišča prve stopnje: (352) 43 03-2100
A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet.It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int).
Veliko dodatnih informacij o Evropski uniji je na voljo po internetu.Dostop je mogoč po strežniku Europa (http://europa.eu.int).
PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER
Natisnjeno na belem papirju, ki ne vsebuje klora.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti
A — The Court of Justice in 2004: changes and proceedings ..................................... 9by Mr Vassilios Skouris, President of the Court of Justice
A — Razvoj in dejavnost Sodišča v letu 2004................................................................9 ................................................................9
B — Composition of the Court of Justice ................................................................... 47
B — Sestava Sodišča...................................................................................................43 ...................................................................................................43
Order of precedence ...................................................................................... 67
Protokolarni vrstni red......................................................................................63 ......................................................................................63
The Court of First Instance of the European Communities
Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti
A — Proceedings of the Court of First Instance in 2004 ............................................ 77by Mr Bo Vesterdorf, President of the Court of First Instance
A — Dejavnost Sodišča prve stopnje v letu 2004 G. predsednik Bo Vesterdorf................................................................................73 ................................................................................73
B — Composition of the Court of First Instance ....................................................... 127
B — Sestava Sodišča prve stopnje............................................................................119 ............................................................................119
Changes in the composition of the Court of First Instance in 2004 ............. 139
Spremembe v sestavi Sodišča prve stopnje v letu 2004...............................131 ...............................131
Order of precedence .................................................................................... 141
Protokolarni vrstni red....................................................................................133 ....................................................................................133
Meetings and visits
Srečanja in obiski
A — Official visits and functions at the Court of Justice ..........................................
A — Uradni obiski in prireditve na Sodišču in Sodišču prve stopnje v letu 2004 .......141
B — Study visits to the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance ................. 153in 2004
B — Obiski pri Sodišču in Sodišču prve stopnje v letu 2004, namenjeni izobraževanju ...................................................................................145
C — Formal sittings in 2004 ..................................................................................... 157
C — Slovesne seje v letu 2004 ..................................................................................149
D — Visits and participation in official functions in 2004 .......................................... 159
D — Obiski ali sodelovanja na uradnih prireditvah v letu 2004..................................151 ..................................151
Tables and statistics
Sodne statistike
A — Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the Court of Justice ...................... 165
A — Sodne statistike Sodišča....................................................................................157 ....................................................................................157
B — Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the Court of First Instance ............ 189
B — Sodne statistike Sodišča prve stopnje................................................................181 ................................................................181
The year 2004 will certainly be recorded in the history of the European Union as the year of its most significant enlargement.
Leto 2004 se bo v zgodovino Evropske unije zagotovo vpisalo kot leto njene najpomembnejše širitve.
The latter did not fail to affect the organisation and functioning of the Court of Justice.
Leta ne bo ostala brez vpliva na organizacijo in delovanje Sodišča.
The arrival of 10 new Judges at the Court of Justice and 10 new Judges at the Court of First Instance, together with the increase of approximately 50% in the institution’s staff, suffices alone to illustrate the challenge which enlargement has represented for the Court of Justice too.
Izziv, ki ga je širitev pomenila za Sodišče, ponazarja že samo dejstvo, da se je tako Sodišču kot tudi Sodišču prve stopnje pridružilo deset novih sodnikov, ki ga je pospremilo povečanje števila zaposlenih v instituciji za 50 %.
Meticulous preparation and, in particular, the remarkable devotion to duty of its staff have, however, enabled the Court successfully to meet the challenge, limited only by the means at its disposal.
Temeljita priprava in predvsem izjemna požrtvovalnost zaposlenih sta omogočili, da se je lahko Sodišče v okviru sredstev, ki jih je imelo na voljo, s tem izzivom uspešno spoprijelo.
The past year has also allowed an initial assessment of the effect of the changes to the functioning of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance resulting from the Treaty of Nice.
V preteklem letu je bilo mogoče predvsem oceniti prve učinke sprememb na delovanje Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje, ki jih je prinesla Pogodba iz Nice.
Those changes were supplemented by a series of internal measures adopted by the Court of Justice in order to improve the effectiveness of its working methods.
Tem je treba prišteti še vrsto notranjih ukrepov, ki jih je Sodišče sprejelo zato, da bi izboljšalo učinkovitost in metode dela.
Finally, the creation of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal also deserves a mention among the events that marked 2004.
Končno je treba med dogodke, ki so prav tako zaznamovali leto 2004, šteti tudi ustanovitev Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije.
This report contains an account of the changes for the institution in the course of this pivotal year and, as is now traditional, a record of the main judicial activity of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, accompanied by statistics.
Bralec bo v poročilu našel tudi predstavitev razvoja institucije v zadnjem letu in, v skladu s tradicijo, bistveni del dejavnosti Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje v ožjem pomenu, skupaj s statističnimi podatki.
The Court of Justiceof the European Communities
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti
Proceedings
Dejavnost
A — The Court of Justice in 2004: changes and proceedings by Mr Vassilios Skouris, President of the Court of Justice
A — Razvoj in dejavnost Sodišča v letu 2004
This part of the Annual Report gives an overview of the activity of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in 2004.
Ta del letnega poročila strnjeno predstavlja dejavnosti Sodišča evropskih skupnosti v letu 2004.
It describes, first, the way the Court developed during that year, with the emphasis on the institutional changes affecting the Court and the changes in its internal organisation and methods of work (section 1).
Najprej ponuja kratek pregled razvoja institucije v navedenem letu s poudarkom na institucionalnih spremembah, ki so vplivale na njeno notranjo organizacijo in na njene metode dela (oddelek 1).
It includes, second, an analysis of the statistics on the Court’s workload and the average length of proceedings (section 2).
V nadaljevanju obsega analizo statistik, ki se nanašajo na razvoj obsega dela institucije in na povprečno trajanje postopkov (oddelek 2).
It presents, third, as each year, the main developments in the case-law, arranged by subject-matter (section 3).
Tako kot vsako leto je po področjih opisan tudi poglaviten razvoj na področju sodne prakse (oddelek 3).
For the Court of Justice, the year 2004 was undoubtedly characterised principally by the enlargement of the European Union and the organisational changes that enlargement entailed for the Court (section 1.1).
Leto 2004 so nedvomno najbolj zaznamovale širitev Evropske unije in organizacijske spremembe, ki jih je ta prinesla (oddelek 1.1).
Also deserving of attention, however, are the transfer of some jurisdiction of the Court of Justice to the Court of First Instance and the creation of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (section 1.2), the important decisions taken by the Court with a view to improving the efficiency of its methods of work (section 1.3), and the amendments to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice and to the Rules of Procedure (section 1.4).
Pozornosti so vredni tudi prenos določenih pristojnosti s Sodišča na Sodišče prve stopnje in ustanovitev Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije (oddelek 1.2), pomembne odločitve, ki jih je Sodišče sprejelo za izboljšanje učinkovitosti metod dela, (oddelek 1.3) in spremembe Protokola o statutu Sodišča in Poslovnika (oddelek 1.4).
The Court had to receive 20 new judges with their chambers (10 Judges of the Court of Justice and 10 Judges of the Court of First Instance) and make ready for the introduction of 9 new official languages.
Predvsem je Sodišče sprejelo dvajset novih sodnikov, skupaj z njihovimi kabineti (deset novih sodnikov Sodišča in deset sodnikov Sodišča prve stopnje), in se pripravilo na uvedbo devetih novih uradnih jezikov.
In its concern to cope with enlargement in the best possible conditions, it had taken certain measures from the beginning of 2002.
V skrbi, da bi bilo kos širitvi v najboljših možnih razmerah, je Sodišče sprejelo določene ukrepe že v začetku leta 2002.
Those measures related in particular to planning the installation of the new chambers, creating a nucleus of staff to be assigned to the nine new language units in the translation department, and organising an ad hoc working group with the task of identifying the needs of the various departments with an eye to the forthcoming accessions.
Ti so se nanašali predvsem na načrtovanje namestitve novih kabinetov, oblikovanje jedra osebja, ki se bo porazdelilo v devet novih jezikovnih enot službe za prevajanje, in oblikovanje ad hoc delovne skupine, zadolžene za ugotovitev potreb, ki jih imajo različne službe z vidika prihodnjih pristopov.
Enlargement became reality for the Court on 11 May 2004, the date of the formal sitting held for the swearing in of the 10 new members of the Court of Justice.
Širitev je za Sodišče postala resničnost dne 11. maja 2004, ko je na slovesni seji priseglo deset novih članov Sodišča.
On 12 May 2004, at the formal sitting for the swearing in of the 9 new judges of the Court of First Instance, the Court met for the first time as a body of 33 members.
Dne 12. maja 2004, ko je na slovesni seji priseglo devet novih članov Sodišča prve stopnje, je Sodišče prvič zasedalo z desetimi novimi člani, ki so nastopili položaje.
It was thus before a Court of Justice containing members from their own countries that the new members of the Court of First Instance were sworn in.
Tako so sodniki Sodišča prve stopnje prisegli pred Sodiščem, ki so ga sestavljali tudi člani Sodišča iz njihovih držav.
For the Court of Justice as for the Court of First Instance, the very last stage of the enlargement process took place on 7 July 2004 when the 10th new member of the Court of First Instance took the oath.
Celotna zadnja stopnja postopka širitve se je za Sodišče, kot tudi za Sodišče prve stopnje, zaključila dne 7. julija 2004, ko je prisegla deseta nova članica Sodišča prve stopnje.
At organisational level, the arrival of the new judges made it necessary to create an additional five-judge Chamber at the Court of Justice.
Na organizacijski ravni je moralo Sodišče zaradi prihoda desetih novih sodnikov ustanoviti nov senat petih sodnikov.
There thus now exist at the Court three Chambers of five judges (the First, Second and Third Chambers) and three Chambers of three judges (the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Chambers).
Tako Sodišče zdaj zaseda v treh senatih petih sodnikov (prvi, drugi in tretji senat) in v treh senatih treh sodnikov (četrti, peti in šesti senat).
Each five-judge chamber consists of eight judges and each three-judge chamber of seven judges, who sit in rotation, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Rules of Procedure.
Vsak senat petih sodnikov sestavlja osem sodnikov in vsak senat treh sodnikov sestavlja sedem sodnikov, ki zasedajo po sistemu rotacije, v skladu z upoštevnimi določbami Poslovnika.
It should also be noted that the three Presidents of the five-judge Chambers do not belong to a three-judge Chamber.
Pomembno je omeniti, da trije predsedniki senatov petih sodnikov niso člani nobenega izmed senatov treh sodnikov.
Preliminary reports have already been presented in several of these cases, in connection with which several hearings have already been held, Opinions of the Advocates General submitted, or even judgments delivered.
Sodišče obravnave, predstavljeni sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca in celo izdane sodbe.
The installation and rapid integration of the new judges and their staff has had a significant impact on the statistics of the Court (see section 2).
Hitri namestitev in vključitev novih sodnikov in njihovih sodelavcev sta znatno vplivali na statistiko Sodišča (oddelek 2).
At linguistic level, enlargement meant the addition of 9 new official languages – clearly a challenge for an institution with an integral multi-language system – so that the Court now has to be capable of functioning in 20 potential languages of the case, producing 380 possible linguistic combinations.
Na jezikovnem področju je širitev pomenila uvedbo devetih novih uradnih jezikov – nedvomno izziv, ki ga je institucija s celostno večjezikovno ureditvijo morala sprejeti –, kar pomeni, da mora biti Sodišče sposobno delati v dvajsetih mogočih jezikih postopka, ki ustvarjajo 380 mogočih jezikovnih kombinacij.
Nine new language divisions were set up within the Court’s translation department, one for each new language.
V okviru službe za prevajanje je bilo ustanovljenih devet novih jezikovnih oddelkov, eden za vsakega izmed novih jezikov.
Recruitment of staff to work in the new divisions took place particularly efficiently.
Zaposlovanje osebja za delo na teh oddelkih je potekalo zlasti učinkovito.
On 31 December 2004 about 83% of the posts provided for those divisions were already filled.
Dne 31. decembra 2004 je bilo zasedenih okoli 83 % delovnih mest, predvidenih za te oddelke.