natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cohesion and the common agricultural policy at being the case should the territorial dimension of the CAP be reinforced?
•Podeželskaobmočjasespopadajosštevilnimiizzivi,odkaterih nekateri izhajajo iz SKP in kohezijske politike.
Should the CAP contribute towards cohesion? Should policymakers refer to territorial impact studies?
Za zaplete, ki jih doživljajo države članice, je najbrž delno kriva nejasna razdelitev ciljev in področja uporabe med kohezijsko politiko in politiko razvoja podeželja.
Half of Europe is predominantly rural, home to around 20% of the population: central and eastern Europe are characterised by a higher share of rural areas which are having to face the challenges of migration and modernisation at the same time.
Vprašanja: Ali bi bilo treba oceniti ukrepe kohezijske politike, ki prispevajo k razvoju podeželskih ozemelj?
• Rural areas face multiple challenges, some of which are at the heart of the CAP and Cohesion Policies.
Ali bi morali imeti evropsko politiko, namenjeno samo vprašanjem podeželja?
Complications experienced by the Member States are probable due in part to an unclear distribution of the objectives and scope between Cohesion and Rural Development policies.
Ali bi bilo treba znova oceniti upravljanje regionalnih skladov? Kako zagotoviti večresorsko upravljanje in upravljanje na več ravneh?
Arising questions: e way rural areas are used is changing, their function varying between Member States often as a result of geography or national policy.
Polovica Evrope je v glavnem podeželsko območje, na katerem živi približno 20 % prebivalstva: za srednjo in vzhodno Evropo je značilen večji delež podeželskih območij, ki se morajo hkrati spopadati z izzivi migracije in modernizacije.
One thing holds true throughout the EU, rural regions display the greatest variations in GDP per capita.
Izkoriščanje podeželskih območij se spreminja.
Should the Cohesion Policy measures that contribute to the development of rural territories be assessed?
Njihova vloga v posameznih državah članicah se razlikuje, pogosto zaradi geografskih značilnosti ali nacionalne politike.
Should there be one European policy solely devoted to rural issues?
Nekaj pa drži za vso EU – med podeželskimi regijami so razlike v BDP na prebivalca največje.
Should the management of regional funds be reassessed?
Po napovedih Komisije se bo do leta 2014 število delovnih mest v kmetijstvu zmanjšalo za pet milijonov.
How can multisectoral and multilevel governance be ensured?
Vendar pa z gospodarskega vidika podeželskih regij ne smemo sistematično obravnavati, kot da nazadujejo.
e emissions trading scheme, promotion of renewables, improving energy efficiency and CO capture and storage
K nadzorovanju emisij plina bodo pripomogli sistem trgovanja z emisijami, spodbujanje obnovljivih virov energije, izboljšanje energijske učinkovitosti ter tehnike zajemanja in shranjevanja
2 techniques will all contribute to the control of gas emissions.
2 vanju ciljev, ki se zahtevajo od njih, upoštevali ozemeljski dejavniki na nacionalni ravni.
ere is no doubt that the change in climate and the impact that it has will vary from region to region and the territories’ capacity to address that will be determined by their geography and the strategic and historic choices in terms of spatial planning, energy policies and economic development.
Spremembe podnebja in njihov učinek se bodo gotovo razlikovali med posameznimi regijami, sposobnost ozemelj za spopadanje z njimi pa bo odvisna od njihovih geografskih značilnosti ter strateških in zgodovinskih odločitev glede prostorskega načrtovanja, energetskih politik in gospodarskega razvoja.
Arising questions:
Vprašanja vključujejo:
Why should diversity and the potential of the territories be considered as important conditions in the fight against climate change?
•Zakajjetrebaraznolikostinmožnostiposameznihozemeljobravnavati kot pomembne okoliščine v boju proti podnebnim spremembam?
Is the intervention of public authorities at community, national and local level decisive in the fight against climate change?
• Ali je posredovanje javnih organov na ravni Skupnosti, nacionalni in lokalni ravni odločilno v boju proti podnebnim spremembam?
To what extent does the success of territorial strategies for sustainable development depend on integrating the Gothenburg and Lisbon strategies?
•Vkolikšnemobsegujeuspehteritorialnihstrategijzatrajno-stni razvoj odvisen od združevanja göteborške in lizbonske strategije?
One of the major challenges Europe faces today is the implantation of an economic system that combines competitiveness, carbon restrictions and security of energy. e promotion of renewable energies implies a significant shift from relatively marginal to mass production. e challenge for the Cohesion Policy is to reconcile the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy with its emphasis on growth and jobs with that of the Gothenburg Strategy, which focuses on sustainable development.
Pospeševanje obnovljivih virov energije pomeni bistven premik od sorazmerno nepomembne do množične proizvodnje. Izziv za kohezijsko politiko je uskladiti cilje lizbonske strategije, ki poudarja rast in zaposlovanje, s cilji göteborške strategije, ki se osredotoča na trajnostni razvoj.
14 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_
14 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_
“is kind of cooperation can identify the subject, diagnose the problem, adopt a plan of action and carry out the actions,” he said, adding that the principal difficulty is not the cash needed, it’s human nature, “there is a need to make people understand that sharing power is not a threat.” e perceived threat of border regions establishing co- operating, interactive groups is holding back some Member States.
Peter Udvardi, direktor enega prvih EZTS v EU Ister Granum, je pojasnil, kako so zadevne regije na Madžarskem in Slovaškem z odprtimi rokami izkoristile priložnost za ustanovitev EZTS. „Pomanjkanje skupnih institucij je zadrževalo razvoj regije.“ Njihov svetovalni odbor sestavljajo predstavniki treh največjih družb, ki so najpomembnejše delodajalke na tem območju, treh industrijskih in trgovinskih zbornic ter štirje člani regionalne skupščine nevladnih organizacij.
But the conference heard how crossborder cooperation between regions, in the form of European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC), can go a long way to realising mutual goals.
Sodelovanje vključuje logistiko, televizijsko in radijsko oddajanje, industrijo, zdravstveno varstvo, v zvezi s katerim so vzpostavili regionalni sistem, in turizem s tematskimi potmi, ki se vijejo po vseh regijah.
Territorial Cohesion and Governance
Če samo ozemlje, ali vključno z ljudmi, ki živijo na njem, ali ne?
Speaking about the EU’s Baltic Sea Strategy, Colin Wolfe, DG REGIO’s head of territorial co-operation, summed up the feeling on the stage, “Cohesion is about overcoming distance, division and inequality.”
Ob razpravi o strategiji EU za baltsko regijo je Colin Wolfe, vodja enote DG REGIO za teritorialno sodelovanje, na odru takole povzel občutke: „Kohezija pomeni preseganje razdalje, delitve in neenakosti.“
Should there be a Council of Ministers for territorial development at European level?
•Alibimoraliimetisvetministrovzateritorialnirazvojnaevropski ravni?
Panorama attended the workshop on governance, where one of the key points to emerge was the difficulty in defining territory: administrative territory as units of government or the land itself?
Razpravljalo se je o sodelovanju med različnimi ravnmi upravljanja in sodelovanju med ozemlji.
If the land itself, then including the people living on it or not? And governance also carries different meanings in different Member States, “Why aren’t there university courses on governance?” asked Jean Marie Beaupuy, a French MEP.
Beaupuy meni, da je upravljanje najboljše, kadar vključuje obvezno institucionalno upravljanje in upravljanje na podlagi partnerstva, pri katerem sodelujejo prosto-voljne organizacije, ki presegajo upravne zahteve pri izpolnjevanju potreb državljanov.
How should the coherence of EU policies with a territorial impact be promoted to support sustainable development at national and regional levels?
„S takim sodelovanjem je mogoče odkriti subjekt, opredeliti težavo, sprejeti načrt ukrepanja in ukrepati,“ je dejal in dodal, da glavna težava ni potrebni denar, ampak človeška narava: „Nujno je ljudi prepričati, da delitev moči ni grožnja.“
How can trans-European cooperation be strengthened to facilitate connectivity and territorial integration?
• Kako bi bilo treba spodbujati skladnost politik EU s teritorialnim vplivom, da bi podprle trajnostni razvoj na nacionalni in regionalni ravni?
Cooperation was discussed, both between different levels of governance and between territories.
Nekatere države članice razumejo ustanavljanje sodelovalnih interaktivnih skupin med obmejnimi regijami kot grožnjo, zaradi
measured and defined when establishing the objectives and implementing the Lisbon Strategy.
•Kakookrepitivseevropskosodelovanje,dabisepospešilapovezljivost in teritorialno združevanje?
Territorial cooperation accelerates the diffusion and transfer of good practice and the Cohesion Policy as a whole, with its objectives and tools, significantly supports the Lisbon Strategy.
S teritorialnim sodelovanjem se pospešujeta razširjanje in prenos dobre prakse, kohezijska politika kot celota pa s svojimi cilji in orodji pomembno podpira lizbonsko strategijo.
If the balanced spread of economic activity is the essence of economic, social and Territorial Cohesion, what is the role of public authorities in ensuring that opportunities to exploit the potential of all of Europe’s territories are fully exploited?
•Čejeuravnovešenaširitevgospodarskedejavnostibistvoeko-nomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije, kakšna je potem vloga javnih organov pri zagotavljanju, da se priložnosti za izkoriščanje možnosti vseh evropskih ozemelj v celoti izkoristijo?
Can Territorial Cohesion help the EU achieve its growth and employment targets?
• Ali lahko teritorialna kohezija pomaga EU pri doseganju njenih ciljev rasti in zaposlovanja?
How Territorial Cohesion fits into the Lisbon Process
Kako je teritorialna kohezija vključena v lizbonski proces
What innovation polices need to be put in place in order to avoid a technological divide between territories with potential and those which are less advanced?
•Katereinovacijskepolitikejetrebauvesti,dabiseizognilitehnološki vrzeli med ozemlji z boljšimi možnostmi in manj naprednimi ozemlji?
e fourth report on Cohesion showed there was a growing risk of territorial imbalance arising from the concentration of growth, innovation and production in the most dynamic regions of the Union. is underlines the necessity of taking into account the way the Lisbon Strategy impacts different territories and their potential to take advantage of the strategy.
•Alisevamzdi,dabimoraleregionalneinovacijskestrategije,kiso prilagojene ugotovljenim prednostim in slabostim ter lokalnim partnerstvom, postati standard za regionalno politiko?
Do you think tailor-made, regional innovation strategies based on specific diagnosis of strengths and weaknesses, and on local partnerships, should become standard for Regional Policy?
Zato je pomembno upoštevati, kako lizbonska strategija vpliva na različna ozemlja, in njihove možnosti, da izkoristijo to strategijo.
Most agree there needs to be more awareness of territorial diversity and a closer look at the scale by which territories are
Večina se strinja, da je treba izboljšati ozaveščenost o ozemeljski raznolikosti in podrobneje preučiti merila, na podlagi katerih se presojajo in opredeljujejo ozemlja, za opredeljevanje ciljev in uresničevanje lizbonske strategije.
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_ p. 15 _BAR_
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_ str. 15 _BAR_
Where do we go from here?
Kako naprej?
e final session explored more questions than answers, raising more issues than resolutions, but the questions were targeted and issues more defined.
Zadnje zasedanje je bilo bolj kot iskanju odgovorov in rešitev posvečeno postavljanju vprašanj, vendar so bila ta natančneje usmerjena in opredeljena.
REGIO’s Deputy Director-General Katherina Maternova’s opening comment the day before, that “the concept of Territorial Cohesion is hard to grasp but is filling with more and more meaning”, seemed to be borne out.
Očitno se je pripomba, s katero je prejšnji dan razpravo začela Katarina Mathernova, namestnica generalnega direktorja DG REGIO, da je „koncept teritorialne kohezije težko opredeljiv, vendar pridobiva vedno večji pomen,“ izkazala za resnično.
Although the Lisbon Treaty in which the notion of Territorial Cohesion is enshrined, is not ratified, the conference made it clear that the subject is buzzing with no shortage of opinions and concerns: how far will territorial cooperation eat into the power of Member States?
Čeprav Lizbonska pogodba, v kateri je zajet pojem teritorialna kohezija, še ni ratificirana, se je na konferenci izkazalo, da je odziv na to temo velik ter da različnih mnenj in skrbi ni malo: kako zelo bo teritorialno sodelovanje vplivalo na pristojnost držav članic?
“If Territorial Cohesion and an appreciation of the territories” individual characteristics should be taken into consideration in the planning of every policy at every level, how can that actually be done?
Če naj se pri načrtovanju vseh politik na vseh ravneh upoštevajo teritorialna kohezija in značilnosti posameznih ozemelj, kako to dejansko storiti?
“Placebased”, “better indicators”, “a closer look at the map”, “the funds not to be considered as a first aid kit”, “co-operation and competition hand in hand”: ere’s no doubt the subject is going to be at the centre of many more debates and the Commission’s Green Paper and subsequent public consultation is timely.
„Krajevna podlaga“, „boljši kazalniki“, „natančnejši ogled zemljevida“, „skladi naj ne veljajo za prvo pomoč“, „sodelovanje in konkurenčnost z roko v roki“: ta tema bo nedvomno še v središču številnih razprav, čas za zeleno knjigo Komisije in javno posvetovanje o njej pa je pravi.
Borders are not a barrier to Territorial Cohesion.
Meje niso ovira za teritorialno kohezijo.
So where are we now?
Kje torej smo?
Arguing that now is not the time to formulate guidelines and regulations, Andreas Faludi, Professor of Spatial Policy Systems at Delft Technical University, urged for the continuation of ‘pragmatic policy planning’ with systematic impact assessments being carried out by transnational and subnational review panels and the vigorous pursuit of Cohesion Policies at all levels.
Andreas Faludi, profesor sistemov prostorskega načrtovanja na Tehnični univerzi v Delftu, je poudaril, da je zdaj pravi čas za oblikovanje smernic in predpisov, ter pozval k nadaljevanju „pragmatičnega načrtovanja politik“, pri čemer naj transnacionalne in subnacionalne komisije za preverjanje sistematično ocenjujejo učinke, kohezijske politike pa naj se dosledno izvajajo na vseh ravneh.
Defining the word ‘territory’ is tricky: the word is related on one hand, to the idea of nation states, countries are not countries without territory – on the other, territories are now emerging as products of human intention, “there is a conflict between the two notions” explained Faludi, adding that it is very difficult for Member States to give away their competences to transnational groups.
Opredeliti besedo „ozemlje“ ni preprosto: ta izraz se po eni strani nanaša na koncept nacionalnih držav, države namreč niso države, če nimajo ozemlja – po drugi strani pa se ozemlja zdaj pojavljajo kot posledica človeškega namena. Faludi je pojasnil, da „sta ti dojemanji v navzkrižju,“ in dodal, da države članice zelo težko prepustijo svoje pristojnosti transnacionalnim skupinam.
While Member States may find it difficult to believe cooperation between regions can improve competitivity and the lives of their citizens, for those policymakers already convinced, the problem is rather how to assess the impact they are having on the ground. e most frequently used indicator, GDP, is not capable of describing the situation in fine enough detail.
Čeprav države članice težko verjamejo, da bi lahko sodelovanje med regijami izboljšalo konkurenčnost in življenje njihovih državljanov, imajo tisti oblikovalci politik, ki so o tem že prepričani, težave z ocenjevanjem dejanskega vpliva tega sodelovanja. Z BDP-jem, ki se najpogosteje uporablja kot kazalnik, ni mogoče dovolj natančno opisati razmer.
As Mathernova explained, indicators may have normative or descriptive functions; in the first category, GDP is and will remain central, because of its robustness; in the second category, the Commission is working with Eurostat to improve understanding of the dynamics.
Kot je pojasnila Mathernova, imajo lahko kazalniki normativno ali opisno nalogo; v prvi kategoriji bo BDP še naprej najpomembnejši zaradi svoje učinkovitosti; v drugi kategoriji pa si Komisija v sodelovanju z Eurostatom prizadeva izboljšati razumevanje dinamike.
Whatever they come up with will not please everyone, “Indicators are a real problem because every Member State tries to work out what is in it for them”, said Faludi.
Nemogoče pa bo zadovoljiti vse. „Kazalniki so resnično težavni, saj vsako državo članico zanima, kakšne koristi bo imela od tega,“ je dejal Faludi.
16 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_
16 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_
As Commissioner Hübner explained: “You see an internal market structured for competitiveness and the stable, macro economic framework of the euro area.
Komisarka Hübner pa je pojasnila: „Imamo notranji trg, ki je oblikovan za konkurenco, in stabilen makroekonomski okvir evroobmočja.
And then you have Cohesion Policy, respecting socio-economic harmony and cherishing solidarity.
Potem pa imamo kohezijsko politiko, ki spoštuje socialno-ekonomsko skladnost in podpira solidarnost.
We need this one Cohesion Policy answerable to all societies, territories and regions.
Potrebujemo eno kohezijsko politiko, ki bo odgovarjala vsem družbam, ozemljem in regijam.
One currency, one market, one Cohesion Policy.”
Enotna valuta, enotni trg, enotna kohezijska politika.“
Credit crunch casts its shadow
V senci posojilne krize
Although far from anyone’s imagination when the conference was planned, the chaos on the financial markets could put thousands of innovation projects at risk throughout Europe, along with having a dramatic impact on jobs and business.
Čeprav si med pripravo konference tega nihče ni predstavljal, bi kaos na finančnih trgih lahko ogrozil na tisoče inovacijskih projektov po vsej Evropi ter močno vplival na zaposlovanje in posle.
Michael Ralph, spokesperson for Vladimir Spidla, the Commissioner for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, voiced the fear that the crisis might put into doubt what has been achieved under the Lisbon Strategy.
Michael Ralph, predstavnik Vladimirja Špidle, komisarja za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in enake možnosti, je bil zaskrbljen, da bi kriza lahko ogrozila dosežke lizbonske strategije.
“Social funds can and must be used to stimulate our workers and companies − it is essential for future growth.
„Za spodbujanje naših delavcev in podjetij je treba uporabiti socialne sklade– to je nujno za rast v prihodnosti.
We must always remember it is the weakest who suffer most in a recession.” e threat of a vicious circle was outlined by Alain Rousset, President of the Association of the French regions at the preconference, kick-off meeting with the press.
Alain Rousset, predsednik združenja francoskih regij, je na uvodnem tiskovnem srečanju pred začetkom konference poudaril nevarnost začaranega kroga.
He called for short-term funding to get businesses and research institutes in the EU through the next year or two, “Concerning today, the impact and duration of the financial crisis must be minimised.
Pozval je h kratkoročnemu financiranju, da bi podjetja in raziskovalne ustanove v EU lahko prebrodili naslednje leto ali dve.
We risk holding up credit investment because the work on innovation is held up because credit has dried up.”
„Že danes je treba omejiti vpliv in trajanje finančne krize.
He fears if public credit isn’t substantial enough the banks won't step in.
Tvegamo ustavljanje posojilnih naložb, saj se je ustavilo delo na področju inovacij, ker ni posojil.“ Boji se, da banke ne bodo posredovale, če javna posojila ne bodo zadoščala.
Commission delegates assured the conference financial measures were being put in place to ease the situation for Member States.
Predstavniki Komisije so na konferenci zagotovili, da se uvajajo finančni ukrepi za olajšanje razmer v državah članicah.
And the opinion from the floor?
Kako razumete ozemlje?
What does territory mean to you?
Kakšno pa je bilo mnenje udeležencev konference?
IT Territorio – governed land with boundaries
IT Territorio – ozemlje z upravo in mejami
DE Gebiet – space Territorium – land and the people on it
DE Gebiet – območje Territorium – ozemlje in ljudje na njem
FI Alue – area
FI Alue – območje
“is was a very well organised and interesting conference with dynamic contributions from the speakers.
„Konferenca je bila zelo dobro organizirana in zanimiva, nastopili so dinamični govorniki.
Although the key points are now more clear it would have been interesting to have heard from those who disagree with the notion of cohesion and its territorial dimension.
Čeprav so bistvene točke zdaj jasnejše, bi bilo zanimivo slišati mnenja tistih, ki se ne strinjajo s pojmom kohezija in njeno ozemeljsko razsežnostjo.
It would be interesting to make the debate more robust.”
Bilo bi zanimivo, če bi bila razprava pestrejša.“
EN Territory – possessed land, what someone owns Terrain – stretch of land with particular regard to its physical features
Concha Játiva Sevilla – uslužbenka na področju regionalne politike Generalnega direktorata za gospodarstvo provincialne vlade Valencije.
Concha Játiva Sevilla – Involved in Regional Policy at the Directorate-General for Economy of the provincial government of Valencia
EN Territory – ozemlje v lasti, nekaj, kar nekomu pripada Terrain – zemljišče, zlasti glede na fizične lastnosti
EL Έδαφο − soil; stretch of land, area
EL Έδαφο − zemljišče; kos zemlje, površina
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ No 28 _BAR_ p. 17 _BAR_
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ št. 28 _BAR_ str. 17 _BAR_
REGIO agenda
Koledar dogodkov REGIO
Rostock (DE)
Rostock, (Nemčija)
Brussels and other cities across Europe
Bruselj in druga evropska mesta
European Commission's Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, the European Institutions and major stakeholders concerned with sustainable energy are together putting on the third edition of the EU Sustainable Energy Week (EUSEW) http://www.fedarene.org/events/Fedarene_events/Eusew_2009/Eusew2009_events.htm
Generalni direktorat Evropske komisije za energijo in transport, evropske institucije in glavne zainteresirane strani na področju trajnostne energije skupaj organizirajo tretji Evropski teden trajnostne energije (EUSEW) http://www.fedarene.org/events/Fedarene_events/Eusew_2009/Eusew2009_events.htm
Public consultation period on Green Paper on e Future of Territorial Cohesion ends − analysis of results of consultation due out late Spring
Obdobje javnega posvetovanja o zeleni knjigi o prihodnosti teritorialne kohezije je končano – analiza rezultatov posvetovanja predvidena do konca pomladi
ISPIM Conference − e Future of Innovation organised by ISPIM, hosted by the Austrian Federal Economic Chamber and supported by DANUBE − European Programmes for Training, Research and Technology and Ratio Strategy & Innovation Consulting http://conference.ispim.org/ 25–29 August
Konferenca ISPIM – Prihodnost inovacij, ki jo organizira ISPIM, gosti avstrijska zvezna gospodarska zbornica, podpira pa jo DANUBE – Evropski programi za usposabljanje, raziskave in tehnologijo ter svetovanje na področju strategij in inovacij http://conference.ispim.org/
49th Annual Congress of the European Regional Science Association http://www.ersa.org/spip.php?rubrique2
49. letni kongres Evropskega združenja za regionalno znanost (European Regional Science Association) http://www.ersa.org/spip.php?rubrique2