natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In that regard, the fifth indent of point (B)(1)(b) of Annex VII to that regulation states that, in the case of table wines with geographical indication and quality wines produced in specified regions, the labelling of the products obtained in the Community may be supplemented by other traditional terms under conditions to be determined and in accordance with the provisions laid down by the Member State of production.
Točka B(1)(b), peta alinea, priloge VII k omenjeni uredbi v zvezi s tem določa, da se označevanje proizvodov, ki so bili proizvedeni v Skupnosti, za namizna vina z geografsko označbo in kakovostna vina, pridelana na določenem pridelovalnem področju, lahko dopolni z drugimi tradicionalnimi izrazi, in sicer pod pogoji, ki se posebej določijo, in v skladu z določbami, postavljenimi v državi članici, v kateri je bilo vino proizvedeno.
For the purposes of the application of that provision, Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002 provides a definition of ‘other traditional terms’.
Za uporabo te določbe je v členu 23 Uredbe �t. 753/2002 opredeljen pojem dodatni tradicionalni izrazi.
It is apparent from the reference for a preliminary ruling that, in the view of the national court, the terms at issue in the main proceedings do not constitute other traditional terms within the meaning of Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002 and the fifth indent of point (B)(1)(b) of Annex VII to Regulation No 1493/1999, since those terms have not been defined in the German legislation.
Iz predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe izhaja, da po mnenju predložitvenega sodi�ča zadevne označbe v postopku v glavni stvari niso dodatni tradicionalni izrazi v smislu omenjenega člena 23 in točke B(1)(b), peta alinea, priloge VII k Uredbi �t. 1493/1999, saj v nem�ki zakonodaji niso urejene.
The question to be examined is therefore whether use of the terms at issue in the main proceedings may be permitted under point (B)(3) of Annex VII to Regulation No 1493/1999.
Zato je treba preučiti, ali je uporaba zadevnih označb v postopku v glavni stvari dopustna na podlagi točke B(3) omenjene priloge VII.
Under that provision, the labelling of certain wines may be supplemented by other particulars.
V skladu s to določbo se označevanje nekaterih vin lahko dopolni z drugimi podatki.
As is apparent from Article 6(2) of Regulation No 753/2002, such particulars may relate to the nature, identity, quality, composition, origin or source of the product concerned or the products used to make it.
Kot izhaja iz člena 6(2) Uredbe �t. 753/2002, se lahko tak�ne navedbe nana�ajo na vrsto, istovetnost, kakovost, sestavo, poreklo ali vir zadevnega proizvoda oziroma proizvodov, uporabljenih pri njegovi proizvodnji.
However, Article 6(1) thereof states that, although the labelling of the products covered may be supplemented by other particulars, that is subject to the proviso that there is no risk that such particulars might mislead those to whom they are addressed, particularly by creating confusion with the compulsory particulars referred to in paragraph A(1) of Annex VII to Regulation No 1493/1999 or the optional particulars referred to in paragraph B(1) of that annex.
Vendar pa omenjeni člen 6(1) določa, da se lahko označevanje zadevnih proizvodov dopolni z drugimi navedbami le, če ni tveganja, da bi lahko te navedbe zavajale osebe, ki so jim namenjene, zlasti z možnostjo zamenjave z obveznimi navedbami iz točke A(1) priloge VII k Uredbi �t. 1493/1999 in z neobveznimi navedbami iz točke B(1) iste priloge VII.
A contrary interpretation would amount to depriving the protection granted to traditional terms by Article 24 of Regulation No 753/2002 of all effectiveness.
Z drugačno razlago bi bil onemogočen polni učinek varstva, ki ga uživajo tradicionalni izrazi na podlagi člena 24 Uredbe �t. 753/2002.
It is for the national court to assess whether the terms in issue in the main proceedings are likely to give rise to such a risk.
Nacionalno sodi�če mora presoditi, ali lahko označbe v postopku v glavni stvari povzročijo tak�no tveganje.
Consequently, the answer to the first question must be that Article 47(2)(c) of Regulation No 1493/1999, in conjunction with point (B)(3) of Annex VII thereto and Article 6(1) of Regulation No 753/2002, is to be interpreted as meaning that the use of a particular relating to the production or ageing method or the quality of a wine may be permitted under those provisions only if there is no risk that it will mislead
1493/1999 v povezavi s točko B(3) priloge VII k tej uredbi in členom 6(1) Uredbe �t. 753/2002 razlagati tako, da navedbe, ki se nana�a na postopek proizvodnje, priprave ali staranja oziroma na kakovost vina, ni dopustno uporabiti na podlagi teh določb, če bi lahko zavajala osebe, ki jim je namenjena, z možnostjo zamenjave
2008 — CASE C-285/06 the persons to whom it is addressed by creating confusion between that particular and the other traditional terms referred to in the fifth indent of point (B)(1)(b) of Annex VII to Regulation No 1493/1999 and Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002.
2008 – ZADEVA C-285/06 z dodatnimi tradicionalnimi izrazi iz točke B(1)(b), peta alinea, priloge VII k Uredbi �t. 753/2002 in člena 23 k tej uredbi.
It is for the national court to assess whether the terms in issue in the main proceedings are likely to give rise to such a risk.
Predložitveno sodi�če mora presoditi, ali lahko zadevne označbe v postopku v glavni stvari povzročijo tako tveganje.
By its second question the national court asks, in essence, whether imitation or evocation of a traditional term within the meaning of Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation No 753/2002 exists only if the language used is the same as the language in which that term is given in Annex III to that regulation or whether that may also be the case where the term in question is translated into a language other than that in which the term is given in that annex.
Predložitveno sodi�če z drugim vpra�anjem v bistvu spra�uje, ali gre za protipravno ponarejanje ali namigovanje v smislu člena 24(2)(a) Uredbe �t. 753/2002 le takrat, ko pride do njega v istem jeziku, v katerem je naveden izraz v prilogi III k tej uredbi, ali pa to velja, tudi če je zadevni izraz preveden v drug jezik, kot je tisti, v katerem je naveden v omenjeni prilogi.
Under Article 47(2)(d) of Regulation No 1493/1999, rules relating to the description, designation and presentation of certain products covered by that regulation, and the protection of certain particulars and terms include, in particular, provisions governing protection and control arrangements for certain terms.
Na podlagi člena 47(2)(d) Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 zajemajo pravila o poimenovanju, označevanju in predstavitvi nekaterih proizvodov iz te uredbe ter o za�čiti nekaterih podatkov in pojmov med drugim tudi določbe o za�čiti ter nadzoru nekaterih podatkov.
The first indent of Article 48 of Regulation No 1493/1999 provides that the description and presentation of the products referred to in that regulation, and any form of advertising for such products, must not be incorrect or likely to cause confusion or to mislead the persons to whom they are addressed, particularly as regards the information provided for in Article 47 of that regulation, and states that that provision is to apply even if the information is used in translation or with a reference to the actual provenance or with additions such as ‘kind’, ‘type’, ‘style’, ‘imitation’, ‘brand’ or the like.
Člen 48, prva alinea, te uredbe določa, da opis in predstavitev proizvodov, navedenih v omenjeni uredbi, ter vse oblike ogla�evanja teh proizvodov ne smejo biti neustrezni ali povzročati zmede oziroma zavajanja oseb, ki so jim namenjeni, zlasti glede na informacije, predvidene v členu 47 omenjene uredbe; poleg tega določa, da ta določba velja, tudi če se informacije uporabljajo v prevodu ali v zvezi z dejanskim izvorom ali dodatki, kakor so „vrsta“, „tip“, „slog“, „imitacija“, „znamka“ ali podobno.
The traditional terms listed in Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation No 753/2002 form part of such information and enjoy the protection provided for in that provision.
Tradicionalni izrazi iz člena 24(2)(a) Uredbe �t. 753/2002 sodijo torej med omenjene izraze in uživajo varstvo na podlagi te določbe.
Under Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation No 753/2002, the traditional terms listed in Annex III to that regulation are to be reserved for the wines to which they are linked and are to be protected against all misuse, imitation or evocation.
V skladu s členom 24(2)(a) so tradicionalni izrazi, navedeni v prilogi III, pridržani za vina, s katerimi so povezani, in za�čiteni pred vsako protipravno prilastitvijo, ponarejanjem ali namigovanjem.
It is true that the second subparagraph of Article 24(4) states that the protection of a traditional term is to apply only for the language(s) in which it appears in Annex III.
Odstavek 4, drugi pododstavek, omenjenega člena 24 sicer določa, da velja za�čita tradicionalnega izraza samo za jezik(-e), v katerem(-ih) je naveden v prilogi III.
However, it cannot be ruled out that the translation of a traditional term into a language other than the one in which that term is given in Annex III may constitute an imitation or evocation of a traditional term, within the meaning of Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation No 753/2002, which might cause confusion or mislead the persons to whom that translation is addressed.
Vendar ni mogoče izključiti, da lahko prevod tradicionalnega izraza v drug jezik, kot je tisti, v katerem je izraz naveden v omenjeni prilogi III, pomeni zavajanje ali namigovanje na tradicionalni izraz v smislu člena 24(2)(a) Uredbe �t. 753/2002, kar lahko povzroči zmedo ali zavajanje oseb, ki jim je ta izraz namenjen.
In addition, such an interpretation would run counter to the actual wording of the first indent of Article 48 of Regulation No 1493/1999, which provides expressly that that provision applies even if traditional terms are used in translation.
Poleg tega tak�na razlaga ne bi bila skladna z besedilom člena 48, prva alinea, Uredbe �t. 1493/1999, ki izrecno določa, da določba velja tudi, če se tradicionalni izrazi uporabljajo v prevodu.
In that case, it must be ensured, in particular, that such a translation is not likely to cause confusion or to mislead the persons to whom it is addressed.
V takem primeru je treba zagotoviti zlasti, da prevod ne more povzročiti zmede ali zavajanja oseb, ki jim je namenjen.
By its third question, the national court asks, in essence, whether a traditional term listed in Annex III of Regulation No 753/2002 is protected only with regard to wines from the same producer Member State as that traditional term, or whether that term is also protected with regard to wines from other producer Member States.
Predložitveno sodi�če s tretjim vpra�anjem v bistvu spra�uje, ali se za�čita tradicionalnega izraza, navedenega v prilogi III k Uredbi �t. 753/2002, nana�a le na vina, ki izvirajo iz iste države članice proizvajalke kot za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz, ali tudi na vina, ki izvirajo iz drugih držav članic proizvajalk.
According to recital 50 in the preamble to Regulation No 1493/1999 and Article 47(1)(a) and (c) thereof, rules relating to the description, designation and presentation of
Na podlagi uvodne izjave 50 in člena 47(1)(a) in (c) Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 imajo pravila o poimenovanju, označevanju in predstavitvi nekaterih proizvodov iz te
SCHNEIDER certain products covered by that regulation, and the protection of certain particulars and terms, laid down in the context of the common organisation of the market in wine, seek, inter alia, to ensure the protection of the legitimate interests of consumers and to promote the smooth operation of the internal market.
SCHNEIDER uredbe ter o za�čiti nekaterih podatkov in pojmov, sprejetih v okviru skupne ureditve trga za vino, med drugim cilj za�čititi legitimne interese potro�nikov in zagotoviti nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga.
In accordance with recital 4 in its preamble, Regulation No 753/2002 should comply with those objectives.
V skladu z uvodno izjavo 4 mora biti Uredba �t. 753/2002 usklajena s temi cilji.
In that context, as is apparent from recital 18 in the preamble thereto, that regulation lays down a common framework for registering and protecting certain traditional expressions so as to ensure fair competition and avoid misleading consumers.
Kot izhaja iz uvodne izjave 18, omenjena uredba s tega vidika določa skupni okvir za registracijo in za�čito teh tradicionalnih izrazov, da bi tako zagotovili po�teno konkurenco in se izognili zavajanju potro�nikov.
Under Article 24(2) of Regulation No 753/2002, which is part of that common framework, the traditional terms listed in Annex III to that regulation are to be reserved for the wines to which they are linked.
V skladu s členom 24(2) Uredbe �t. 753/2002, ki je del tega skupnega okvira, so tradicionalni izrazi, navedeni v prilogi III, pridržani za vina, s katerimi so povezani.
Article 24(3) states that trade marks used to describe a wine on its labelling may not contain traditional terms listed in Annex III unless the wine qualifies for such a traditional term.
Odstavek 3 omenjenega člena 24 določa, da se smejo blagovne znamke, ki vsebujejo tradicionalne izraze iz priloge III, uporabiti za opis vina na njegovi nalepki samo, če vino izpolnjuje pogoje za označevanje s takim tradicionalnim izrazom.
The third subparagraph of Article 24(4) provides that each traditional term listed in Annex III is to be linked to one or more categories of wine.
Odstavek 4, tretji pododstavek, omenjenega člena 24 določa, da je vsak tradicionalni izraz, naveden v prilogi III, povezan z eno kategorijo vina ali več temi.
Under Article 24(5)(d), to qualify for inclusion in the annex in question, a traditional term must be used for one or more Community wines or categories of Community wine.
V skladu z odstavkom 5(d) istega člena 24 mora biti za vnos v zadevno prilogo tradicionalni izraz v uporabi za eno vino ali več vin oziroma kategorij vin v Skupnosti.
It is apparent from all of those provisions that the traditional terms referred to in Article 24 of Regulation No 753/2002 must be linked to one or more categories of wine and that those terms are reserved for the category or categories of wine to which they are linked.
Iz vseh teh določb izhaja, da morajo biti tradicionalni izrazi iz člena 24 Uredbe �t. 753/2002 povezani z eno kategorijo vina ali več temi in da so pridržani za kategorijo ali kategorije vin, s katerimi so povezani.
Those categories, which are listed in the third subparagraph of Article 24(4), are, as is apparent from the actual wording of Article 24(5)(d), categories of Community wine.
Te kategorije, ki so navedene v odstavku 4, tretji pododstavek, omenjenega člena 24, so, kot izhaja iz besedila odstavka 5(d) istega člena, kategorije vin Skupnosti.
On that basis, those categories cannot therefore be regarded as relating only to wine from a single producer Member State but must, on the contrary, be regarded as being used for wine from all of the producer Member States.
Na tej podlagi torej ni mogoče �teti, da se omenjene kategorije nana�ajo le na vina, ki izvirajo iz ene same države članice proizvajalke, temveč je treba �teti, da so povezane z vini, ki izvirajo iz vseh držav članic proizvajalk.
In those circumstances, the protection of a traditional term within the meaning of Article 24 of Regulation No 753/2002 operates both with regard to wines of the same category/categories from the same producer Member State as that traditional term and with regard to wines of the same category/categories from other producer Member States.
V teh okoli�činah se za�čita tradicionalnega izraza v smislu člena 24 Uredbe �t. 753/2002 nana�a na vina iste kategorije oziroma kategorij, ki izvirajo iz iste države članice proizvajalke kot za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz, in tudi na vina iste kategorije oziroma kategorij, ki izvirajo iz drugih držav članic proizvajalk.
A contrary interpretation would amount to depriving the protection of traditional terms, guaranteed by Article 24(2), of its effectiveness, and would run counter to the objectives of the protection of the legitimate interests of consumers and the smooth operation of the internal market pursued by Regulations Nos 1493/1999 and 753/2002.
Drugačna razlaga bi onemogočila polni učinek varstva, ki ga tradicionalni izrazi uživajo na podlagi omenjenega člena 24(2), prav tako pa ne bi bila v skladu s ciljema za�čite legitimnih interesov potro�nikov in nemotenega delovanja notranjega trga, ki jima sledita uredbi �t. 1493/1999 in 753/2002.
Article 47(2)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine, in conjunction with
Člen 47(2)(c) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino v povezavi točko B(3) priloge VII k tej uredbi in členom 6(1) Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 753/2002 z dne 29. aprila 2002 o določitvi
2008 — CASE C-285/06 point (B)(3) of Annex VII thereto and Article 6(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 of 29 April 2002 laying down certain rules for applying Regulation No 1493/1999 as regards the description, designation, presentation and protection of certain wine sector products, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1512/2005 of 15 September 2005, must be interpreted as meaning that the use of a particular relating to the production or ageing method or the quality of a wine may be permitted under those provisions only if there is no risk that it will mislead the persons to whom it is addressed by creating confusion between that particular and the other traditional terms referred to in the fifth indent of point (B)(1)(b) of Annex VII to Regulation No 1493/1999 and Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002.
2008 – ZADEVA C-285/06 nekaterih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe št. 1493/1999 glede opisa, poimenovanja, predstavitve in zaščite nekaterih proizvodov iz vinskega sektorja, kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1512/2005 z dne 15. septembra 2005, je treba razlagati tako, da navedbe, ki se nanaša na postopek proizvodnje, priprave ali staranja oziroma na kakovost vina, ni dopustno uporabiti na podlagi teh določb, če bi lahko zavajala osebe, ki jim je namenjena, z možnostjo zamenjave z dodatnimi tradicionalnimi izrazi iz točke B(1)(b), peta alinea, omenjene priloge VII k Uredbi št. 753/2002 in člena 23 k tej uredbi.
It is for the national court to assess whether the terms in issue in the main proceedings are likely to give rise to such a risk.
Predložitveno sodišče mora presoditi, ali lahko zadevne označbe v postopku v glavni stvari povzročijo tako tveganje.
Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation No 753/2002, as amended by Regulation No 1512/2005, is to be interpreted as meaning that there may be imitation or evocation of a traditional term within the meaning of that provision where that term is translated into a language other than that in which that term is given in Annex III to that regulation, if that translation is likely to cause confusion or to mislead the persons to whom it is addressed.
Člen 24(2)(a) Uredbe št. 753/2002, kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo št. 1512/2005, je treba razlagati tako, da lahko prevod izraza v drug jezik, kot je tisti, v katerem je naveden v prilogi III k tej uredbi, pomeni zavajanje ali namigovanje na tradicionalni izraz v smislu te določbe, če lahko tak prevod povzroči zmedo ali zavajanje oseb, ki jim je namenjen.
It is for the national court to examine whether that is the case in the dispute before it.
Predložitveno sodišče mora preučiti, ali gre v postopku, v katerem odloča, za tak primer.
Article 24(2) of Regulation No 753/2002, as amended by Regulation No 1512/2005, is to be interpreted as meaning that a traditional term listed in Annex III to that regulation is protected both with regard to wines of the same category/categories from the same producer Member State as that traditional term and with regard to wines of the same category/categories from other producer Member States.
Člen 24(2) Uredbe št. 753/2002, kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo št. 1512/2005, je treba razlagati tako, da se zaščita tradicionalnega izraza, navedenega v prilogi III k tej uredbi, nanaša tako na vina iste kategorije oziroma kategorij, ki izvirajo iz iste države članice proizvajalke kot zaščiteni tradicionalni izraz, kot tudi na vina iste kategorije oziroma kategorij, ki izvirajo iz drugih držav članic proizvajalk.
Joined Cases C-383/06 to C-385/06
Združene zadeve od C-383/06 do C-385/06
(References for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State)
(Predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki jih je vložilo Raad van State)
(Structural Funds — Article 23(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 — Withdrawal and recovery of Community financial aid — Article 249 EC — Protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty)
„Strukturni skladi – Člen 23(1) Uredbe (EGS) �t. 4253/88 – Ukinitev in vračilo finančne pomoči Skupnosti – Člen 249 ES – Varstvo upravičenega pričakovanja in pravne varnosti“
Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 13 March 2008 . . . . . . . .
Sodba Sodi�ča (tretji senat) z dne 13. marca 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Economic and social cohesion — Structural assistance — Community financing (Council Regulation No 4253/88, Art. 23(1))
Ekonomsko-socialna kohezija – Strukturne intervencije – Financiranje Skupnosti (Uredba Sveta št. 4253/88, člen 23(1))
SUMMARY — JOINED CASES C-383/06 TO C-385/06
POVZETEK – ZDRUŽENE ZADEVE OD C-383/06 DO C-385/06
(see para. 40, operative part 1)
Dejstvo, da je upravičenec do sredstev oseba javnega prava, pri tem ni pomembno.
The national court may apply the Community law principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations when assessing the conduct of both the recipients of the amounts lost and the administrative authority, on condition that full account is taken of the interests of the European Community.
Vračila sredstev, izgubljenih zaradi zlorabe ali malomarnosti, se morajo izvajati na podlagi člena 23(1) Uredbe �t.
(see para. 59, operative part 2)
(Glej točko 59 in točko 2 izreka.)
REFERENCES for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Raad van State (Netherlands), made by decisions of 30 August 2006, received at the Court on 18 September 2006, in the proceedings
V združenih zadevah od C-383/06 do C-385/06, katerih predmet je predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe na podlagi člena 234 ES, ki ga je vložilo Raad van State (Nizozemska) z odločbami z dne 30. avgusta 2006, ki so prispele na Sodi�če 18. septembra 2006, v postopkih
2008 — JOINED CASES C-383/06 TO C-385/06 v
2008 – ZDRUŽENE ZADEVE OD C-383/06 DO C-385/06 proti
Advocate General: Y. Bot, Registrar: C. Strömholm, Administrator, having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 28 June 2007, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
Bot, sodna tajnica: C. Strömholm, administratorka, na podlagi pisnega postopka in obravnave z dne 28. junija 2007, ob upo�tevanju stali�č, ki so jih predložili:
2008 — JOINED CASES C-383/06 TO C-385/06 the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments (OJ 1988 L 374, p.
2008 – ZDRUŽENE ZADEVE OD C-383/06 DO C-385/06 mentov (UL L 374, str. 1), kot je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) �t. 2082/93 z dne 20. julija 1993 (UL L 193, str.
20; ‘Regulation No 4253/88’).
20, v nadaljevanju: Uredba �t. 4253/88).
The references have been made in the course of three actions brought by two Netherlands associations and a Netherlands local authority against the Netherlands administration.
Ti predlogi so bili vloženi v okviru treh sporov med dvema nizozemskima združenjema in eno občino ter nizozemsko upravo.