natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
• Actions for annulment and for failure to act brought by: • a Community institution or by the European Central Bank (ECB) against another institu­tion or the ECB; • a Member State against the Parliament and/or the Council, except for actions against the Council concerning State aid, dumping or the Council's powers of implementation; • a Member State against the Commission con­cerning "close cooperation" as provided for in the EC Treaty.
• Ničnostne tožbe in tožbe zaradi nedelovanja, ki jih vloži • institucija - ali Evropska centralna banka (ECB) - proti drugi instituciji ali ECB; • država članica proti Parlamentu in/ali Svetu z izjemo tistih, ki so vložene proti Svetu v zvezi z državnimi pomočmi, dumpingom, ali izvršilnimi pristojnostmi Sveta; ■ država članica proti Komisiji v zvezi z okrepljenim sodelovanjem v okviru Pogodbe ES.
THE IMPACT OF THE SUCCESSIVE ENLARGEMENTS ON THE COMPOSITION OF THE ECJ
VPLIV RAZLIČNIH ŠIRITEV NA SESTAVO SODIŠČA EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI
7 Judges, 2 Advocates General, 57 members of staff
7 sodnikov, 2 generalna pravobranilca, 57 uslužbencev
Council Decision of 22 December 1980 on the adjustments to the Treaties made necessary by the increase in the number of Judges (OJ 1980 L 380, p. 6).
Sklep Sveta o prilagoditvah pogodb, potrebnih zaradi povečanja števila sodnikov, 22. december 1980 (UL ES L 380, str. 6).
The Court of Justice of the European Communities:
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti:
THE SEAL AND COURT DRESS: A HISTORY OF SYMBOLS AND INFLUENCES
Sklepi Sveta o povečanju števila sodnikov in generalnih pravobranilcev Sodišča, 30. marec 1981 (UL ES L 100, str. 20 in 21).
7 Judges, 2 Advocates General, 73 members of staff
7 sodnikov, 2 generalna pravobranilca, 73 uslužbencev
9 Judges, 4 Advocates General, 223 members of staff www.curia.europa.eu
9 sodnikov, 4 generalni pravobranilci, 223 uslužbencev
Judicial symbols, which are very much in evidence within the national courts of the Member States, also play a very important role within the Court, which, whilst having an international dimension, is primarily a Community court.The first Judges of the ECSC Court were therefore called upon to choose a seal and court dress.
Sodniška simbolika, ki je prisotna pri nacionalnih sodiščih držav članic, ima zelo pomembno vlogo tudi na Sodišču, ki je sicer mednarodno sodišče, a vendarle predvsem sodišče Skupnosti. Prvi sodniki Sodišča ESPJ so bili zato pozvani, naj izberejo pečat in uradna sodniška oblačila.
10 Judges and 4 Advocates General
10 sodnikov in 4 generalni pravobranilci
March 1981: 2 11 Judges,
2 : 11 sodnikov,
Court of First Instance
Sodišče prve stopnje
5 Advocates General, 452 members of staff
5 generalnih pravobranilcev, 452 uslužbencev
At the suggestion of President PILOTTI, who was attached to the Roman tradition, the symbols of the sword and scales and an oak-leaf garland were decided on for the seal.
Na predlog predsednika PILOTTIJA, navezanega na rimsko tradicijo, so bili kot sestavni deli pečata določeni simbol tehtnice, meča in venca iz hrastovih listov.
Moreover, the word “Curia” was emblazoned on the seal, a reference to Latin, which was formerly the most commonly used language in Europe.
Poleg tega je bila v znak povezave z latinščino kot nekdaj najbolj uporabljanega jezika v Evropi v pečat Sodišča vstavljena beseda „Curia“.
The word is also used as part of the institution’s internet website address.
Ta je tudi v spletnem naslovu institucije.
13 Judges, 6 Advocates General
13 sodnikov, 6 generalnih pravobranilcev
1 January 1986: Spain, Portugal
1. januar 1986: Španija, Portugalska
571 members of staff
571 uslužbencev
15 Judges, 9 Advocates General up to October 2000, followed by 8.
15 sodnikov, 9 generalnih pravobranilcev do oktobra 2000, nato 8
Court of Justice of the European Communities L-2925 Luxembourg
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti L-2925 Luxembourg
Civil Service Tribunal
Sodišče za uslužbence
950 members of staff
950 uslužbencev
Furthermore, for almost 20 years, the Members of the Court wore a cap.
Poleg tega so člani Sodišča nosili pokrivala„baret“ skoraj dvajset let.
In 1973, that headgear was abandoned.
Leta 1973 je bilo to pokrivalo opuščeno.Malo pozneje je ovratnik, ki je bil sprva vezen, postal preprostejši.
A little later, the bands of the gown, which were originally embroidered, became more simple.
Mediji in informacije
25 Judges, 8 Advocates General
25 sodnikov, 8 generalnih pravobranilcev
There is nothing in court dress to distinguish one Member of the Court from another.
Med službenimi oblačili članov Sodišča ni razlik.
However, the front of the Registrar’s gown is edged with satin whereas the gowns worn by Judges and Advocates General are edged with velvet.
Kljub temu sodni tajnik na sprednji strani toge nosi satenast trak, medtem ko je trak, ki krasi toge sodnikov in generalnih pravobranilcev, izdelan iz žameta.
1641 members of staff
1641 uslužbencev
1 May 2004: 3Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia
1.maj 20043: Češka republika, Estonija, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Madžarska,Malta, Poljska, Slovenija, Slovaška
Finally, when the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (1988) and the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (2004) were created, a different colour was chosen for the dress of their Members, who wear, respectively, a navy blue gown and a black gown.
Nazadnje je bila ob ustanovitvi Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti (1988) in Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije (2004) sprejeta odločitev, da bo barva oblačil teh dveh sodišč drugačna, tako da imajo člani Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti toge temno modre barve, člani Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije pa toge črne barve.
27 Judges, 8 Advocates General
27 sodnikov, 8 generalnih pravobranilcev
1 January 2007: Bulgaria, Romania
1. januar 2007: Bolgarija, Romunija
Approximately 2000 members of staff
Približno 2000 uslužbencev
However, the fact that the Court’s various departments were located in buildings far from each other did not assist it in the performance of its tasks.
Toda porazdelitev služb Sodišča v različne stavbe ni olajševala izvajanja nalog.
Moreover, from 1958 onwards, as the ECJ’s sphere of jurisdiction grew, so did the number of its staff.
Poleg tega je po letu 1958 povečanje pristojnosti SDES povzročilo povečanje števila njegovega osebja.
“I greet you not only as the Court of the European Coal and Steel Community but also as the precursor of a Supreme European Federal Court”.
„V vas ne pozdravljam samo Sodišča Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo, temveč tudi obet Vrhovnega zveznega evropskega sodišča“.
From the address delivered by Jean Monnet at the inaugural session of the ECSC Court, Luxembourg, 10 December 1952
Ta projekt, ki ga je Sodišče sprejelo, predvideva gradnjo novega stavbnega kompleksa ob ohranitvi struktur nekdanje Palače.
This project, which has been approved by the Court, provides for the construction of a new building complex, with the structure of the old “Palais” being retained.The complex as a whole will be laid out in the following manner:• At the centre, the renovated old “Palais”, which will be open to the public and accommodate the courtrooms and meeting rooms;• Around the “Palais”, a two-storey ring resting on steel columns, housing the chambers of the Members of the Court, and • two tall office towers, each comprising 24 storeys, to be occupied by the Court’s various departments, in particular the translation directorate.
Arhitekturna celota je urejena tako: • v sredini je stara obnovljena Palača, prostor odprt za javnost, kjer so razpravne in konferenčne dvorane; • Palačo obdaja dvonadstropni obroč, ki je oprt na jeklene stebre in je namenjen kabinetom članov Sodišča, in • dva velika stolpa za pisarne, vsak s po 24 nadstropji, ki sta namenjena različnim službam, zlasti prevajalski službi.
In August 1959 the Luxembourg Government agreed to make available to the Court a building, belonging to the Bishopric of Luxembourg and located on the Côte d’Eich, which was large enough to accommodate all its departments.
Avgusta 1959 se je luksemburška vlada strinjala, da Sodišču da na voljo stavbo, ki je pripadala luksemburški škofiji vmestnem predelu Côte d’Eich in je bila dovolj velika za vse njegove službe.
The need for accommodation resulting from successive accessions of European States to the Community led to the amenity spaces inside the buildings gradually being taken over for use as office space.
Prostorske potrebe zaradi nadaljnjih pristopov evropskih držav k Skupnosti so narekovale vse večjo uporabo prostorov za prosti čas v zgradbah za ureditev pisarn.
Ultimately, it became inevitable that part of the landscaped area surrounding the main Court building should be used for the construction of 3 extensions to the “Palais”, designed by the Luxembourg architects FRITSCH, HERR and HUYBERECHTS, and the Italian architect PACZOWSKI: the “Erasmus” Building (1988), the “Thomas More” Building (1993) and, lastly, the “C” Building (1994).
Nazadnje se ni bilo mogoče izogniti gradnji 3 podaljškov k „Palači“, za katere so namenili del zelenih površin okrog palače. Te podaljške so projektirali luksemburški arhitekti FRITSCH, HERR in HUYBERECHTS ter italijanski arhitekt PACZOWSKI, in sicer zgradbo „Erasmus“ (1988), zgradboThomas More (1993) in zgradbo C (1994).
In his declaration of 9 May 1950, Robert Schuman proposed
Kljub temu je bila to še ena začasna rešitev.
Once again, that proved to be a temporary arrangement as the first enlargement in 1973 was to lead to a considerable increase in the number of staff at the Court.
Prva širitev leta 1973 je namreč zelo povečala število osebja Sodišča.
As such an increase in staff numbers was faced by each of the Community institutions, it was decided in the 1960s to develop the Plateau de Kirchberg in the City of Luxembourg so that they could all be accommodated in the same location.
Ker se je povečalo število zaposlenih vseh institucij Skupnosti, je bila v šestdesetih letih sprejeta odločitev, da se z namenom, da bodo vse na enem mestu, uredi plateau Kirchberg mesta Luxembourg.
It was on that plateau that the definitive premises of the Court were to be constructed.
Na tej lokaciji so bili zgrajeni dokončni prostori Sodišča.
Pending completion of the renovation of the “Palais” and the construction of the new extension and in order to accommodate the Civil Service Tribunal, the Court has taken possession of a number of buildings which, whilst scattered over the Plateau de Kirchberg, are not too far from the “Palais”: the temporary T and T-bis Buildings (1999/2004), designed specifically for the translation directorate, the Geos Building (2004) which houses the administrative departments, such as “Research and Documentation” and Personnel, and the Allegro Building (2006) which accomodates the Civil Service Tribunal.
Sodišče je v čakanju na prenovo„Palače“ in na gradnjo novega podaljška ter zato, da bi zagotovilo prostore Sodišču za uslužbence Evropske unije, priskrbelo več zgradb na plateau Kirchberg, ki od Palače niso preveč oddaljene: začasni zgradbi T in T-bis (1999/2004), ki sta bili zasnovani posebej za prevajalske službe, zgradbo Geos (2004), kjer so upravne službe, kot sta službi „Raziskave in dokumentacija“ in kadrovska služba, ter zgradbo Allegro (2006), v kateri ima sedež Sodišče za uslužbence Evropske unije.
In order to ensure that the “Palais” complied with regulations and to meet the needs of future accessions, it was decided to build a fourth extension, the architect Dominique PERRAULT being appointed to devise the project.
Da bi„Palačo“ uredili po ustreznih standardih in da bi bili kos prihodnjim pristopom, je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se zgradi četrti podaljšek, katerega projekt je pripravil arhitekt Dominique PERRAULT.
Commission) and “means of appeal against the decisions” of that High Authority.
ProjektPerrault vitev naslednje institucionalne strukture in sodnega sistema: skupna Visoka oblast (predhodnica Komisije) in „potrebna pravna sredstva proti odločitvam“ Visoke oblasti.
9 January 1973Inauguration of the main court building on the Plateau du Kirchberg
9. januar 1973 Odprtje„Sodišča“ na Kirchbergu.
21 December 1954First judgments delivered by the Court of the ECSC: France v High Authority (1/54) and Italy v High Authority (2/54)
11. oktober 1989 Sklep o ugotovitvi Sodišča, da je SDPS ustanovljeno v skladu s predpisi.
11 October 1989Decision of the Court of Justice declaring that the CFI is constituted in accordance with the law.
21. december 1954 Prvi sodbi Sodišča ESPJ: zadeva Francija proti Visoki oblasti (1/54) in zadeva Italija proti Visoki oblasti (2/54).
26 February 2001Signature of the Treaty of Nice amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related acts.
26. februar 2001 Podpis Pogodbe iz Nice, ki spreminja Pogodbo o Evropski uniji, pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropskih skupnosti in nekatere z njimi povezane akte.
Possibility of creating judicial panels.
Možnost ustanovitve sodnih oddelkov.
18 April 1951Signature of the Treaty of Paris establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC)
7. februar 1992 Podpis Pogodbe o Evropski uniji v Maastrichtu
28 February 1986Signature of the Single European Act.
28. februar 1986 Podpis Enotnega evropskega akta.
Possibility of attaching a court of first instance to the Court.
Možnost priključitve prvostopenjskega sodišča k Sodišču.
7 February 1992Signature in Maastricht of the Treaty on European Union .
18. april 1951 Podpis Pariške pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za premog in jeklo (ESPJ).
23 July 2002Expiry of the ECSC Treaty
23. julij 2002 Konec veljavnosti ESPJ.
5 October 1988Inauguration of the Erasmus Building
5. oktober 1988 Odprtje stavbe Erasmus.
23 July 1952Entry into force of the Treaty of Paris and appointment of Massimo PILOTTI, first President of the Court of the ECSC
23. julij 1952 Začetek veljavnosti Pariške pogodbe in imenovanje Massima PILOTTIJA, prvega predsednika Sodišča ESPJ.
29 October 2004Signature in Rome of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
25.marec 1957 Podpis Rimskih pogodbo ustanovitvi Evropske gospodarske skupnosti (EGS) in Evropske skupnosti za jedrsko energijo (Euratom) in Konvencije o združitvi nekaterih institucij Evropskih skupnosti.
25 March 1957 Signature of theTreaties of Rome establishing the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC) and the Convention on certain institutions common to the European Communities.
12. december 1992 Sklep Evropskega sveta v Edimburgu o določitvi sedežev institucij ter nekaterih organov in oddelkov Evropskih skupnosti.
Creation of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ), a single court for the three Communities, replacing the Court of the ECSC.
SDES ima sedež v Luxembourgu.
24 October 1988 Decision of the Council establishing a Court of First Instance of the European Communities (CFI)
24. oktober 1988 Sklep Sveta o ustanovitvi Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti (SDPS).
12 December 1992 Decision of the European Councilin Edinburgh on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies and departments of the European Communities. The ECJ is to have its seat in Luxembourg.
2. oktober 1997 Podpis Amsterdamske pogodbe, ki spreminja Pogodbo o Evropski uniji, pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropskih skupnosti in nekatere z njimi povezane akte in Protokola o določitvi sedežev institucij ter nekaterih organov in služb Evropskih skupnosti in Europola.
10 December 1952Inauguration of the Court of the ECSC, housed in the Villa Vauban in Luxembourg
10. december 1952 Odprtje Sodišča ESPJ, ki se je nahajalo v vili Vauban v Luxembourgu.
August 1959The Court moves to new premises on the Côte d’Eich
Avgust 1959 Selitev Sodišča na novo lokacijo Côte d’Eich.
2 November 2004Decision of the Council establishing the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (CST)
2. november 2004 Sklep Sveta o ustanovitvi Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije (SDU)
Treaties
Pogodbe
Important dates in the history of the Court of Justice
Pomembni mejniki v zgodovini SDES
The procedurebefore the Court of First Instance
Postopek pred Sodiščem prve stopnje
Direct actions andappeals
Direktne tožbein pritožbe
Written procedure
Pisnidel postopka
The Court of First Instanceof the European Communities
Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti
Mergers
Koncentracije
Court of Justice of the European Communities: www.curia.eu.int Judgments of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance: www.curia.eu.int/en/content/juris/index.htm Press releases: www.curia.eu.int/en/actu/communiques/index.htm Portal of the European Union institutions: www.europa.eu.int Community legislation (EUR-Lex):www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti: www.curia.eu.int Sodbe Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje: www.curia.eu.int/fr/content/juris/index.htm Obvestilo zamedije: www.curia.eu.int/fr/actu/communiques/index.htm Portal institucij Evropske unije: www.europa.eu.int Zakonodaja Skupnosti (EUR-Lex):www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/
[Application for legal aid]
Vročitev tožbe toženi stranki po sodnem tajništvu
Airtours, a British company selling package tours from the United Kingdom, wished toacquireacompetitor,First Choice.
Airtours, britanska družba, ki v Združenem kraljestvu trži paketna potovanja,jehotela prevzeti konkurenčno družbo First Choice.
The Commission was informed by Airtours of this proposedmerger.
O tem projektu združitve je Airtours obvestil Komisijo.
The Commission declared themerger incompatiblewith thecommonmarket on theground that it wouldhaveled to Airtours havingacollectivedominant position.
Taje ugotovila,dajeposelvneskladju s skupnim trgom,ker najbi povzročilkolektivni prevladujoči položaj.
The Commission decided that the transactionwas unlawful State aid, incompatible with thecommonmarket.
Komisijajeopredelila poselkot nedopustnoin s skupnim trgomnezdružljivodržavno pomoč.
According to the Commission, thedifferencebetween themarket valueand theamount paidwas the sum of around EUR 808million, and this constituted unlawful State aid.
Ponjenemmnenju je razlikamed tržnocenoin plačanimzneskomznašala približno808milijonovevrov,ki pomenijo protipravnodržavno pomoč.
The Land and the twobankingorganisations then sought annulment of the Commission decision before the Court of First Instance.
Deželainbanki so pred Sodiščem prve stopnje predlagali razglasitev ničnosti odločbe Komisije.
Airtours brought anactionbefore the Court of First Instancefor annulment of the Commission’s decision.
Airtours je pri Sodišču prve stopnjevložilničnostno tožbozoper odločbo Komisije.
Allocationof thecase to a Chamber
Obvestilo v Uradnem listu EU– serija C www.curia.eu.int
The Court stated that amerger maybe prohibitedifit willleaddirectlyandimmediately to thecreationor reinforcement ofacollectivedominant position, significantlydistortingeffectivecompetitionin themarket over along period.
Sodišče prve stopnjejeopozorilo,da prepovedkoncentracije predpostavlja,dajeneposrednain takojšnja posledica koncentracije nastanek in okrepitev kolektivnega prevladujočega položaja,kiznatnoindolgotrajnoovira učinkovitokonkurencona trgu.
The Court ruled that the Commission, which is subject toaduty togive reasons,hadfailed togive sufficient reasons for its estimateof themarket value.
Sodišče prve stopnjeje razsodilo, da Komisija, za katero velja dolžnost obrazložitve,nidovoljobrazlo-žilacenitve tržnevrednosti. Takojeodločbo razglasilozanično (sodbazdne 6. marca 2003 v združenih zadevahWestdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale, Land Nordrhein-Westfalen proti Komisiji, T-228/99 in T-233/99).
Defence [Objection of inadmissibility]
Določitev sodnika poročevalca
The Court concluded that,because the Commission had made a number oferrors ofassessment,ithadnot shown sufficient evidenceof thenegativeeffects of themerger oncompetition,and the Court thereforeannulled thecontesteddecision (judgment in Airtours plc v Commission, 2002).
Sodišče prve stopnje je odločilo, da Komisija zaradi številnihnapak pri presojinizadostno prikazalanegativnih učinkovkoncentracijenakonkurenco,inje torej razglasilozaničnoizpodbijanoodločbo(sodbazdne 6. junija 2002 v zadevi Airtours plc proti Komisiji, T-342/99).
Access todocuments
Dostop dodokumentov
[Interventions]
Odgovor na tožbo[Ugovor nedopustnosti]
Ms Hautala,amember of the European Parliament, had asked the Council of the European Union tosendher a report onarms exports.
Članica Evropskega parlamenta Hautala je od Sveta Evropske unijezahtevala,najji posreduje poročilooizvozu orožja.
Relyingonits power to refuseaccess to suchadocument inorder to protect the publicinterest in thefieldofinternational relations, the Council refused to release thereport becauseit contained sensitiveinformation, thedisclosureofwhichmight harm the relations of the European Unionwith non-Member States.
Sklicujoč senamožnost zavrnitvedostopado takega dokumenta, zaradi varovanja javnega interesa na področju mednarodnih odnosov, je Svet zavrnil posredovanje poročila,kajti tojevsebovaloobčutljiveinformacije,katerih razkritjebilahko škodovalo odnosom Evropske unije stretjimidržavami.
The Judge-Rapporteur prepares the preliminary report Chamber conferenceof the Judges [Measures ofinquiry]
[Dodelitevzadeverazširjenemu senatu,velikemu senatu,občni sejiali sodniku posamezniku]
[Allocationof the case to a Chamber (extended composition), to the Grand Chamber, to the full Court or toa single Judge]
Sodnik poročevalec pripravi predhodno poročilo Zasedanje senata[Pripravljalni ukrepi]
Communitylaw prohibits allagreements betweencompanies,alldecisions byassociations ofcompa-nies andallconcerted practices whicharelikely toaffect trade betweenMember States andwhichareintended toor have theeffect of preventing, restrictingor distortingcompetitionwithin thecommonmarket.
Skupnostno pravo prepovedujevse sporazumemed podjetji, sklepe podjetniškihzdruženjinvsausklajena ravnanja,kibilahko prizadeli trgovinomeddržavamičlanicamiinkaterihciljali posledica je preprečevanje, omejevanje ali izkrivljanje konkurence na skupnem trgu.
In this situation,Ms Hautalabrought anactionbefore the Court of First Instance seekingannulment of the Council’s decision refusing to sendher the report.
Sodišče prve stopnjejev sodbiopozorilonanačelo, pokateremmoraimetijavnost največjimožnimeridostop dodokumentov,izjemeod teganačela semora razlagatiin uporabljatiozko.
Court of First Instanceof the European Communities rue du Fort Niedergrünewald L-2925 Luxembourg
Sodišče prve stopnje Evropskih skupnostiruedu Fort Niedergrünewald L-2925 Luxembourg
[Report for thehearing; hearing]
[Poročilo za obravnavo; obravnava]
Followingacomplaint, the Commission made certain checks and,in1998,adoptedadecisionfind-ing that anumber ofcompanies participatedina set of prohibitedagreements and practices in the European district heatingmarket.
Na podlagi prijave je Komisija izvedla nekatere preiskaveinleta1998 sprejela ugotovitvenoodločboo sodelovanju več podjetijv skupini sporazumovin prepovedanih ravnanjnaevropskem trgu komu-nalnegaogrevanja.
The Commission imposed fines amounting toa total of around EUR 92 millionon thecompanies participatingin that cartel.
Komisijajedružbam, udeleženimv temkartelu,naložiladenarnokazenv skupnemznesku približno92 milijonovevrov.
Press and Information
Mediji in informacije
It said that the Council shouldhaveconsidered the possibilityofeditingcertain pages likely toharminternational relations and thereforelookedintowhether partialaccess to thedocument couldbeauthorised.
V tem primeru bi moral Svet preizkusitimožnost počrnitinekatere strani,kibilahko škodovalemed-narodnimodnosom,in raziskati,alibibildelnidostop do poročilalahkodovoljen.
Since the Council had not taken that step, the Court annulledits decision (judgment in Hautala v Council, 1999).
Ker Svet ni ravnal tako, je Sodišče prve stopnje razglasilozaničnonjegovoodločbo (sodbazdne19. julija 1999 v zadevi Hautala proti Svetu, T-14/98).