natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 2 of the Competition Directive, entitled ‘Exclusive and special rights for electronic communications networks and electronic communications services’, provides:
Člen 2 Direktive o konkurenci z naslovom „Izključne ali posebne pravice za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in elektronske komunikacijske storitve“ določa:
Member States shall not grant or maintain in force exclusive or special rights for the establishment and/or the provision of electronic communications networks, or for the provision of publicly available electronic communications services.
Države članice ne smejo podeliti ali ohraniti v veljavi izključnih ali posebnih pravic za vzpostavitev in/ali zagotavljanje elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ali za zagotavljanje javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
Member States shall take all measures necessary to ensure that any undertaking is entitled to provide electronic communications services or to establish, extend or provide electronic communications networks.
Države članice sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da se zagotovi upravičenost katerega koli podjetja do opravljanja elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ali vzpostavljanja, �irjenja ali zagotavljanja elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij.
Member States shall ensure that a general authorisation granted to an undertaking to provide electronic communications services or to establish and/or provide electronic communications networks, as well as the conditions attached thereto, shall be based on objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and transparent criteria.
Države članice zagotovijo, da splo�no dovoljenje, ki se izda podjetju za zagotavljanje elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ali za vzpostavitev in/ali zagotavljanje elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, pa tudi z njim povezani skupaj z nanj vezanimi pogoji, temeljijo na objektivnih, nediskriminatornih, sorazmernih in preglednih merilih.
Article 4 of the Competition Directive, entitled ‘Rights of use of frequencies’, states:
V členu 4 direktive o konkurenci, ki ima naslov „Pravice do uporabe frekvenc“, je določeno:
‘Without prejudice to specific criteria and procedures adopted by Member States to grant rights of use of radio frequencies to providers of radio or television broadcast content services with a view to pursuing general interest objectives in conformity with Community law:
„Brez poseganja v posebna merila in postopke, sprejete v državah članicah za podeljevanje pravic do uporabe radijskih frekvenc ponudnikom vsebin radijskih ali televizijskih storitev, za varstvo ciljev splo�nega interesa v skladu s pravom Skupnosti:
Member States shall not grant exclusive or special rights of use of radio frequencies for the provision of electronic communications services.
Države članice ne smejo podeliti izključnih ali posebnih pravic do uporabe radijskih frekvenc za zagotavljanje elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev;
The assignment of radio frequencies for electronic communication services shall be based on objective, transparent, nondiscriminatory and proportionate criteria.’
Dodeljevanje radijskih frekvenc za elektronske komunikacijske storitve temelji na objektivnih, preglednih, nediskriminatornih in sorazmernih merilih.“
Article 9 of the Competition Directive provides:
Člen 19 direktive o konkurenci določa:
‘Member States shall supply to the Commission not later than 24 July 2003 such information as will allow the Commission to confirm that the provisions of this Directive have been complied with.’
„Države članice predložijo Komisiji informacije, ki Komisiji omogočajo potrditev, da so bile določbe te direktive izpolnjene, najpozneje do 24. julija 2003.“
Law No 249 of 31 July 1997 (Ordinary Supplement to GURI No 177 of 31 July 1997) (‘Law No 249/1997’), which came into force on 1 August 1998, set up the Autorità per le garanzie nelle comunicazioni (Communications Regulatory Authority; ‘the Autorità’).
177 z dne 31. julija 1997, v nadaljevanju: zakon �t. 249/1997), ki je začel veljati 1. avgusta 1998, je bil ustanovljen Autorità per le garanzie nelle comunicazioni (organ za urejanje komunikacij, v nadaljevanju: organ za urejanje).
Article 2(6) of Law No 249/1997 imposed restrictions on concentrations in the television broadcasting sector, prohibiting the same operator from holding rights permitting it to broadcast at national level on more than 20% of the television channels operating on terrestrial frequencies.
Člen 2(6) zakona �t. 249/1997 je določal omejitve glede koncentracije sektorja televizijske radiodifuzije, tako da je prepovedal, da ima isti operater koncesijo, s katero lahko na nacionalni ravni oddaja na več kot 20 % televizijskih kanalov prek zemeljskih frekvenc.
Article 3(1) of Law No 249/1997 provided that operators authorised to broadcast under the previous legal framework could continue to broadcast at national and local level until new rights were granted or applications for new rights were rejected but, in any event, not after 30 April 1998.
Člen 3(1) zakona �t. 249/1997 je operaterjem, ki so upravičeni oddajati na podlagi predhodnih predpisov, omogočil, da �e naprej oddajajo na nacionalni in lokalni ravni, dokler se ne dodelijo nove koncesije ali dokler se ne zavrnejo zahteve za dodelitev novih koncesij, najpozneje pa 30. aprila 1998.
Article 3(2) of Law No 249/1997 provided for the adoption by the Autorità of a national plan for the allocation of radio frequencies for broadcast television (‘the national allocation plan for radio frequencies’) by 31 January 1998 at the latest and, on the basis of that plan, the allocation of new rights by 30 April 1998 at the latest.
Člen 3(2) zakona �t. 249/1997 je določal, da organ za urejanje sprejme nacionalni načrt za dodeljevanje radijskih frekvenc za televizijsko radiodifuzijo (v nadaljevanju: nacionalni načrt za dodeljevanje radijskih frekvenc) najpozneje do 31. januarja 1998, na podlagi tega načrta pa se nove koncesije dodelijo najpozneje do 30. aprila 1998.
Article 3(6) of Law No 249/1997 provided for transitional arrangements for the existing national television channels exceeding the limits for concentration imposed in Article 2(6) of that Law (‘the channels in breach of the threshold’) by allowing those channels to continue to broadcast on terrestrial radio frequencies on a transitional basis after 30 April 1998, in compliance with the obligations imposed on the channels holding rights, provided that the programmes were broadcast on satellite or cable at the same time.
Člen 3(6) zakona �t. 249/1997 je določal prehodno ureditev za obstoječe nacionalne televizijske kanale, ki presegajo omejitve glede koncentracije, določene s členom 2(6) tega zakona (v nadaljevanju: presežni kanali), tako da je tem kanalom omogočil, da začasno �e naprej oddajajo po zemeljskih frekvencah po 30. aprilu 1998, tako da spo�tujejo obveznosti, ki jih imajo kanali, ki imajo koncesijo, če se oddaja sočasno prek satelita in prek kabla.
According to the information in the decision making the reference and supported by the observations of the Italian Government and the Commission, by judgment No 466 of the Corte costituzionale (Constitutional Court) (Italy) of 20 November 2002 (GURI of 27 November 2002), that deadline was fixed at 31 December 2003.
Iz navedb iz predložitvene odločbe, ki so bile potrjene v stali�čih italijanske vlade in Komisije, izhaja, da je bil s sodbo ustavnega sodi�ča (Corte costituzionale) �t. 466 z dne 20. novembra 2002 (GURI z dne 27. novembra 2002) ta rok določen na 31. december 2003.
According to the case-file, under Decree-Law No 5 of 23 January 2001 (GURI No 19 of 24 January 2001, p.
Iz prilog tega spisa izhaja, da so v skladu z uredbo-zakonom �t. 5 z dne 23. januarja 2001 (GURI �t.
5), converted into law and amended by Law No 66 of 20 March 2001 (GURI No 70 of 24 March 2001, p.
19 z dne 24. januarja 2001), ki je postal zakon in je bil spremenjen z zakonom �t. 66 z dne 20. marca 2001 (GURI �t.
3), the operators lawfully engaged in television broadcasting activities on terrestrial frequencies were authorised to continue to broadcast until the national allocation plan for radio frequencies for digital television was implemented.
70 z dne 24. marca 2001), operaterji, ki zakonito opravljajo dejavnost televizijske radiodifuzije prek zemeljskih frekvenc, lahko �e naprej oddajali, dokler se ne začne izvajati nacionalni načrt za dodeljevanje radijskih frekvenc za digitalno televizijo.
4), authorised the channels in breach of the threshold to continue their broadcasts on the televised analogue and digital networks pending the completion of an inquiry into the development of digital television channels.
4), je presežnim kanalom omogočil, da �e naprej analogno in digitalno oddajajo na radiotelevizijskih omrežjih, in sicer do zaključka preiskave o razvoju digitalnih televizijskih kanalov.
Law No 112 of 3 May 2004 (Ordinary Supplement to GURI No 82 of 5 May 2004) (‘Law No 112/2004’) specified the different stages for the launch of the phase of digital broadcasting on terrestrial radio frequencies.
104 z dne 5. maja 2004, v nadaljevanju: zakon �t. 112/2004) je določil različne faze lansiranja faze digitalnega oddajanja prek zemeljskih radijskih frekvenc.
Article 23 of Law No 112/2004 provides:
Člen 23 zakona �t. 112/2004 določa:
Until the national allocation plan for radio frequencies for digital television has been implemented, the operators exercising, on any basis, television broadcasting
Dokler se ne izvede nacionalni načrt za dodeljevanje televizijskih digitalnih frekvenc, operaterji, ki opravljajo kakr�no koli dejavnost nacionalne ali lokalne
Experimental digital broadcasting may be carried out by means of installations lawfully exercising analogue activities on the date of the entry into force of this Law.
Poskus digitalnega oddajanja lahko poteka z napravami, s katerimi se zakonito izvaja analogno oddajanje na datum začetka veljavnosti tega zakona.
In order to allow digital networks to be set up, transfers of installations or branches of undertakings between operators lawfully televising at national or local level shall be authorised, on condition that acquisitions are intended for digital broadcasting.
Da bi se zagotovila digitalna omrežja, se lahko izvede prenos naprav ali delov podjetja med operaterji, ki zakonito opravljajo dejavnost nacionalnega ali lokalnega televizijskega oddajanja, če so pridobitve namenjene digitalnemu oddajanju.
With effect from the date of entry into force of this Law, the licence to operate a television network shall be issued, upon request, to persons lawfully engaged in television broadcasting pursuant to a grant of rights or under the general consent provided for in subparagraph 1, where they show that they have attained a coverage of not less than 50% of the population or of the local catchment area.
Od datuma začetka veljavnosti tega zakona se licenca operaterja televizijskega kanala na zahtevo dodeli osebam, ki zakonito opravljajo dejavnost televizijskega oddajanja iz naslova koncesije ali splo�ne odobritve iz odstavka 1, ki dokažejo, da so pokrile najmanj 50 % populacije ali lokalne interesne sfere.
In order to facilitate the conversion of the analogue system to the digital system, the broadcasting of television programmes shall be carried on through installations lawfully operating on the date of the entry into force of this Law …’
Da bi se olaj�al prehod z analognega na digitalni sistem, oddajanje radiotelevizijskih programov poteka z uporabo naprav, ki se zakonito uporabljajo na datum začetka veljavnosti tega zakona […]“
The dispute in the main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
Spor o glavni stvari in vprašanja za predhodno odločanje
The dispute in the main proceedings relates to compensation for the harm which Centro Europa 7 claims to have suffered as a result of the fact that the defendants in the main proceedings did not allocate to it radio frequencies for terrestrial analogue television broadcasting.
Postopek v glavni stvari se je nana�al na od�kodnino za �kodo, ki naj bi jo družba Centro Europa 7 utrpela, ker naj ji tožena stranka v postopku v glavni stvari ne bi dodelila radijskih frekvenc za zemeljsko ali analogno televizijsko radiodifuzijo.
On 28 July 1999, Centro Europa 7 was granted by the competent Italian authorities, pursuant to Law No 249/1997, rights for terrestrial television broadcasting at national level authorising the installation and use of a television network using analogue technology.
Družbi Centro Europa 7 so pristojni italijanski organi v skladu z zakonom �t. 249/197 dodelili koncesijo za zemeljsko nacionalno televizijsko radiodifuzijo, s katero sta se ji omogočila vzpostavitev in uporaba analognega radiotelevizijskega omrežja.
For the allocation of radio frequencies, the rights referred to the national allocation plan for radio frequencies, which was adopted on 30 October 1998.
Glede dodeljevanja radijskih frekvenc je koncesija upo�tevala nacionalni načrt za dodeljevanje radijskih frekvenc, ki je bil sprejet 30. oktobra 1998.
According to the national court, however, that plan has not been implemented, with the result that, although it has rights, Centro Europa 7 has never been in a position to broadcast for lack of radio frequencies.
Iz predložitvene odločbe pa izhaja, da se ta načrt ni izvajal, tako da družba Centro Europa 7, čeprav je imela koncesijo, nikoli ni mogla oddajati, ker ji niso bile dodeljene radijske frekvence.
Centro Europa 7 brought an action before the Tribunale amministrativo regionale (Regional Administrative Court) del Lazio (Italy) seeking, inter alia, a declaration that it was entitled to the allocation of frequencies and to compensation for the damage suffered.
Družba Centro Europa 7 je pri upravnem sodi�ču regije Lacije (Tribunale amministrativo regionale del Lazio) vložila zahtevek, med drugim, za priznanje pravice do dodelitve radijskih frekvenc in od�kodninski zahtevek.
That court dismissed that application by judgment of 16 September 2004.
To sodi�če je zahtevka zavrnilo s sodbo z dne 16. septembra 2004.
According to the decision making the reference, in the appeal brought by Centro Europa 7 against that judgment before the Consiglio di Stato (Council of State) (Italy), the defendants in the main proceedings invoke against it, inter alia, Law No 112/2004.
Iz predložitvene odločbe izhaja, da tožene stranke v postopku glavni stvari v okviru pritožbe družbe Centro Europa 7 zoper to sodbo pred Consiglio di Stato med drugim ugovarjajo zakonu �t. 112/2004.
While stating, in that decision, that it restricted its examination to Centro Europa 7’s application for damages and did not intend to rule at that stage on the application for the grant of radio frequencies, the Consiglio di Stato observes that the failure to allocate radio frequencies to Centro Europa 7 was caused by essentially legislative factors.
Consiglio di Stato je v tej odločbi odločilo, da bo preučilo le od�kodninski zahtevek družbe Centro Europa 7 in v tej fazi ne bo odločalo o zahtevku za priznanje pravice do dodelitve frekvenc, ter razložilo, da se družbi Centro Europa 7 ni dodelilo frekvenc v glavnem zaradi zakonskih dejavnikov.
It notes that Article 3(2) of Law No 249/1997 enabled the ‘de facto users’ of radio frequencies, authorised to carry on their activity under the earlier system, to continue broadcasting until new rights were granted or applications for new rights were rejected and, in any event, not after 30 April 1998.
Opozarja, da je člen 3(2) zakona �t. 249/1997 omogočil „dejanskim imetnikom“ frekvenc, ki so upravičeni opravljati dejavnost na podlagi predhodne ureditve, da �e naprej oddajajo, dokler se ne dodelijo nove koncesije oziroma dokler se ne zavrnejo zahteve za nove koncesije, in sicer najpozneje do 30. aprila 1998.
It notes, also, that Article 3(7) of Law No 249/1997 authorised the continuation of those broadcasts by referring back to the Autorità to fix a deadline, on the sole condition that the programmes are broadcast simultaneously on terrestrial radio frequencies and by satellite or cable.
Opozarja tudi, da je člen 3(7) zakona �t. 249/1997 omogočil nadaljevanje teh oddajanj, tako da je določil, da organ za urejanje določi končni datum, samo če ta oddajanja potekajo hkrati prek zemeljskih frekvenc in prek satelita ali kabla.
In the absence of a date fixed by the Autorità, the Corte costituzionale set 31 December 2003 as the date by which the programmes broadcast by the channels in breach of the threshold would have to be broadcast only by satellite or cable, so that, according to the national court, the radio frequencies to be allocated to Centro Europa 7 would be freed up.
Ker organ za urejanje ni določil datuma, je Corte costituzionale določilo, da se morajo po 31. decembru 2003 programi, ki jih oddajajo presežni kanali, oddajati le prek satelita ali prek kabla, s tem pa naj bi se po mnenju predložitvenega sodi�ča sprostile frekvence, ki bi jih bilo treba dodeliti družbi Centro Europa 7.
According to the national court, that Law therefore had the effect of blocking the radio frequencies intended for allocation to the rights holders and of preventing operators other than those de facto broadcasting on terrestrial frequencies from participating in the digital television experimentation.
Posledica tega zakona je bila, kot ugotavlja predložitveno sodi�če, da se radijske frekvence, ki naj bi bile dodeljene koncesionarjem analogno, niso sprostile in da je bilo ostalim operaterjem, razen tistim, ki so že oddajali prek zemeljskih frekvenc, onemogočeno, da sodelujejo pri poskusnem digitalnem televizijskem oddajanju.
In those circumstances, the Consiglio di Stato decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling:
V teh okoli�činah je Consiglio di Stato prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo ta vpra�anja:
(2) Do the provisions of the … Treaty which secure freedom to provide services and competition, on the interpretation provided by the Commission in the interpretative communication of 29 April 2000 on grants of rights under Community law, require the principles governing that matter to be capable of ensuring equal nondiscriminatory treatment, as well as transparency, proportionality and respect for the rights of individuals; and are those provisions and principles of the Treaty infringed by Article 3(7) of Italian Law No 249/1997, and by Article 1 of Decree-Law [No 352/2003], inasmuch as those provisions enabled individuals operating networks in breach of the limits laid down by competition law to continue to operate, thereby excluding operators, such as the appellant undertaking, which, though in possession of the relevant rights granted following a regular competitive procedure, were unable to carry on the activity in respect of which such rights were granted because of a failure to allocate frequencies owing to their insufficient number or scarcity as a result of the continued exercise of rights by the owners of networks in breach of the limits on concentrations under antitrust law?
249/1997 in člena 1 uredbezakona [�t. 352/2003], kolikor so subjektom, ki upravljajo s kanali, ki „presegajo“ protikartelno omejitev, omogočile, da neprekinjeno nadaljujejo z opravljanjem njihove dejavnosti, in tako izključile operaterje, kot je družba pritožnica, ki čeprav ima ustrezno koncesijo, ki ji je bila dodeljena po postopku, odprtem za konkurenco, ne more opravljati koncesijske dejavnosti zaradi nedodelitve radijskih frekvenc (zaradi premajhnega �tevila oziroma njihovega pomanjkanja, ki je posledica prej navedenega nadaljevanja delovanja imetnikov t. i. presežnih kanalov), v nasprotju z navedenimi določbami in načeli Pogodbe?
2008 — CASE C-380/05
2008 – ZADEVA C-380/05 za državo članico, ki je dodelila koncesije za dejavnost televizijske radiodifuzije (ki obsega pravico do namestitve omrežij in zagotavljanja storitev elektronskih komunikacij ali pravico do uporabe radijskih frekvenc)?
(4) Do Article 9 of [the Framework Directive] and Article 5 of the Authorisation Directive providing for transparent and nondiscriminatory public procedures (Article 5) conducted on the basis of objective, transparent, nondiscriminatory and proportionate criteria (Article 9) preclude a system providing for general authorisation under national law (Article 23(5) of Law No 112/2004); by permitting the continued operation, under that system of networks in breach of limits and not selected under a competitive procedure, do those provisions ultimately impinge on the Community-law rights under (Article 17(2) of the … Authorisation Directive) of other undertakings which are prevented from operating even though they have been successful in competitive procedures?
112/2004), ki s tem, da dovoljuje nadaljevanje oddajanja ‚presežnim kanalom‘, ki niso bili izbrani na javnih razpisih, �kodi pravicam, ki jih imajo druga podjetja na podlagi zakonodaje Skupnosti (člen 17(2) […] direktive o odobritvi), ki jim je preprečena možnost delovanja, čeprav so bila izbrana v postopkih odprtih za konkurenco?
By its questions, the national court asks the Court, essentially, to rule on the interpretation of the provisions of the Treaty on freedom to provide services and competition, the Framework Directive, the Authorisation Directive, the Competition Directive and Article 10 of the ECHR, in so far as Article 6 EU refers thereto.
S temi vpra�anji predložitveno sodi�če prosi Sodi�če, naj poda razlago določb Pogodbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev in konkurenci, okvirni direktivi, direktivi o odobritvi, direktivi o konkurenci ter o členu 10 EKČP, če se nanj sklicuje člen 6.
The jurisdiction of the Court and the admissibility of the questions
Pristojnost Sodišča in dopustnost vprašanj za predhodno odločanje
As a preliminary point, it must be stated, first, that by some of its questions the national court is inviting the Court to give a ruling on the compatibility with Community law of certain provisions of the Italian legislation relevant in this case.
Za začetel je treba najprej ugotoviti, da z nekaterimi vpra�anji predložitveno sodi�če poziva Sodi�če, naj se izreče o skladnosti nekaterih določb upo�tevnega italijanskega prava s pravom Skupnosti.
The Court has, however, repeatedly held that it is competent to give the national court full guidance on the interpretation of Community law in order to enable it to determine the issue of compatibility for the purposes of the case before it (see, inter alia, Case C-292/92 Hünermund and Others [1993] ECR I-6787, paragraph 8, and Enirisorse, paragraph 24).
Vendar je Sodi�če večkrat presodilo, da lahko predložitvenemu sodi�ču predloži vse ustrezne elemente razlage prava Skupnosti, ki mu lahko omogočijo, da presodi tako skladnost za sodbo v zadevi, o kateri odloča (glej zlasti sodbo z dne 15. decembra 1993 v zadevi Hünermund in drugi, C-292/92, Recueil, str. I-6787, točka 8, in zgoraj navedeno sodbo Enirisorse, točka 24).
It is therefore appropriate for the Court, in the present case, to restrict its analysis to the provisions of Community law by providing an interpretation of them which will be of use to the national court, which has the task of determining the compatibility of the provisions of national law with Community law, for the purposes of deciding the dispute before it.
Sodi�če mora torej v tej zadevi omejiti presojo na določbe prava Skupnosti, tako da poda razlago teh določb, ki bo predložitvenemu sodi�ču, ki mora presojati o skladnosti nacionalnih določb s pravom Skupnosti, koristila pri re�itvi spora, ki poteka pred tem sodi�čem.
None the less, the Court has no jurisdiction to give a preliminary ruling on a question submitted by a national court where it is quite obvious that the ruling sought by that
Kljub temu Sodi�če ne more odločati o vpra�anju za predhodno odločanje, ki mu ga je zastavilo nacionalno sodi�če, ker je očitno, da razlaga pravila Skupnosti, ki jo je