natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Not only does that series of studies reflect the difficulty of assessing the real costs of the assistance provided by La Poste to SFMI-Chronopost, but it is evident, according to undisputed statements in the contested decision, that the Deloitte report an alyses the findings of the Bain study and addresses them.
Ne le, da to zaporedje �tudij kaže na težavnost presojanja dejanskih stro�kov podpore, ki jo je ponujala družba La Poste družbi SFMI-Chronopost, ampak se na podlagi navedb v sporni odločbi, ki niso bile izpodbijane, zdi, da poročilo Deloitte analizira ugotovitve �tudije Bain in nanje odgovarja.
In those circumstances, the data which the Commission used after that report was lodged, and on the basis of all of the
V teh okoli�činah ni mogoče �teti, da so podatki, ki jih je Komisija uporabila po tem, ko je bilo to poročilo predloženo, in na
CHRONOPOST AND LA POSTE v UFEX AND OTHERS considerations included in it, must be regarded as having been established according to the information available at the time, rather than arbitrarily.
CHRONOPOST IN LA POSTE PROTI UFEX IN DRUGIM podlagi vseh v njem zajetih ugotovitev, določeni samovoljno, ampak ob upo�tevanju podatkov, ki so bili takrat na voljo.
Second, UFEX and Others contest the methodology used in the Deloitte report and then by the Commission in order to determine the costs incurred by La Poste in respect of the SFMI-Chronopost express delivery business, on the ground that it effectively disregards the fact that certain fixed costs are directly attributable to the express delivery business alone.
Drugič, združenje UFEX in drugi izpodbijajo metodo, uporabljeno v poročilu Deloitte in ki jo je nato Komisija uporabila pri določitvi stro�kov, ki jih je imela družba La Poste v zvezi z dejavnostjo hitre po�te družbe SFMI-Chronopost, ker naj bi dejansko prezrla dejstvo, da so določeni fiksni stro�ki nastali neposredno zaradi same dejavnost hitre po�te.
However, such criticism is relevant only on the assumption that La Poste incurred costs specifically attributable to the express delivery business; this has in no way been demonstrated by UFEX and Others, who, without identifying any of those costs precisely, merely referred to documents containing otherwise unsubstantiated general information.
Vendar se tako grajanje upo�teva le, če se domneva, da so dokazani stro�ki družbe La Poste, ki so nastali izrecno zaradi dejavnosti hitre po�te, kar združenje UFEX in drugi nikakor niso dokazali, saj so se – ker niso natančno navedli nobenih od teh stro�kov – v zvezi s tem sklicevali le na dokumente, v katerih so bile zajete splo�ne navedbe, ki niso bile utemeljene drugače.
In any event, the use of that method — which falls within the Commission’s broad discretion in the technical findings it has to make — is not evidently the product of a manifest error of assessment, in circumstances where, as here, it is not necessarily inconsistent to attribute the proportion of fixed costs to one or other activity depending on the volume of the various activities.
Nikakor se ni zdelo, da bi bila uporaba te metode – ki spada na področje �iroke diskrecije Komisije pri tehnični presoji, ki jo mora izvesti – rezultat očitne napake pri presoji, čeprav ni nujno nedosledno, da se kot v obravnavani zadevi del fiksnih stro�kov pripi�e eni ali drugi dejavnosti ob upo�tevanju obsega različnih dejavnosti.
Third, it is common ground that, as has been stated in paragraph 147 of the present judgment, it was impossible, in the absence of analytical accounts for La Poste for the period from 1986 to 1992, to calculate exactly the costs of services provided for SFMI-Chronopost.
Tretjič, ni sporno, da – kot je bilo navedeno v točki 147 obravnavane sodbe – zaradi neobstoja analitičnega računovodstva družbe La Poste v obdobju od leta 1986 do leta 1992 ni bilo mogoče natančno izračunati stro�kov storitev, opravljenih v korist družbe SFMI-Chronopost.
It is precisely in order to overcome that deficiency that the consultants, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, were entrusted with reprocessing the available accounting data in order to be able to produce the best possible estimate of the total costs involved in the logistical and commercial assistance thus provided to SFMI-Chronopost.
Ravno zato, da bi odpravili to pomanjkljivost, je bilo svetovalni družbi Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu zaupano, naj ponovno pregleda računovodske podatke, ki so na voljo, da bi lahko, kolikor je mogoče natančno, ocenila celotne stro�ke logistične in komercialne podpore družbi SFMI-Chronopost.
In that context, it is not manifestly inappropriate for that reprocessing to have entailed various adjustments, the reasons for and extent of which were explained in the Commission’s response of 27 May 2005 to the written questions put to the parties by the Court of First Instance.
V teh okoli�činah se ne zdi očitno neprimerno, da so v teh ponovnih pregledih različne prilagoditve, pri čemer so razlogi zanje in njihov obseg obrazloženi v odgovoru Komisije z dne 27. maja 2005 na pisna vpra�anja, ki jih je strankam postavilo Sodi�če prve stopnje.
The existence of such adjustments does not, by itself, justify a finding of inconsistency in the data used by the Commission on the basis of that study.
Obstoj takih prilagoditev sam po sebi ne omogoča, da bi ugotovili nedoslednost podatkov, ki jih je Komisija uporabila na podlagi te �tudije.
Fourth, as regards the question whether La Poste’s behaviour as a shareholder of SFMI-Chronopost was commercially justified under the market economy investor principle, and therefore did not conceal subsidies liable to constitute State aid, the Commission, as the contested decision shows, verified that the IRR of La Poste’s investment as a shareholder was in excess of the total cost of the equity in SFMI-Chronopost, that is to say, the normal rate of return that a private investor would require under similar circumstances.
Četrtič, Komisija je, kot to izhaja iz sporne odločbe, v zvezi z vpra�anjem, ali je bilo ravnanje družbe La Poste kot delničarja družbe SFMI-Chronopost tržno utemeljeno ob upo�tevanju načela tržno usmerjenega investitorja in se za njim torej niso skrivale subvencije, ki bi lahko pomenile državne pomoči, preverila, ali je interna stopnja donosnosti – TRI – investicij družbe La Poste kot delničarja vi�ja od celotnih stro�kov kapitala družbe SFMI-Chronopost, to je običajna stopnja donosnosti, ki bi jo pod enakimi pogoji zahteval zasebni investitor.
There is no dispute about the fact that the calculations made, as explained in the contested decision and as shown in table 1 in the Commission’s statement in reply of 27 May 2005, — that is to say, without taking into account the aid consisting in the access to La Poste’s network and goodwill (first scenario) — resulted in the finding that the IRR largely exceeded the cost of the equity.
Ugotovljeno je in ni bilo izpodbijano, da je izračun, kakr�en je naveden v sporni odločbi in je razviden iz razpredelnice 1 iz odgovora Komisije z dne 27. maja 2005 – torej ne da bi bila upo�tevana pomoč, ki naj bi jo pomenil dostop do mreže in temeljni tržnih elementi družbe La Poste (prav možnost) – privedel do ugotovitve, da je interna stopnja donosnosti zelo presegla stro�ek kapitala.
As to the IRR calculated with account being taken of the aid consisting in the access to the network and that goodwill (second scenario), UFEX and Others submit that table 2 of that statement is vitiated by a calculation error.
Združenje UFEX in drugi v zvezi z interno stopnjo donosnosti, izračunano ob upo�tevanju pomoči, ki naj bi jo pomenili dostop do mreže in temeljni tržni elementi družbe La Poste (druga možnost), zatrjujejo, da naj bi bili v razpredelnici 2 navedenega odgovora napačni izračuni.
However, it must be held that UFEX and Others’ claim, which does not challenge the finding resulting from the first scenario, cannot have any effect.
Vendar je treba ugotoviti, da trditev združenja UFEX in drugih, v kateri ni bila vpra�ljiva ugotovitev iz prve možnosti, ne more imeti učinkov.
It follows from the contested decision that the Commission resorted to the second scenario only on the basis of the data provided by UFEX and Others, the content of which was disputed by the Commission, and only in order to reinforce the results of its first scenario.
Na eni strani iz sporne odločbe namreč izhaja, da se je Komisija na drugo možnost sklicevala le na podlagi podatkov, ki so jih predložili združenje UFEX in drugi, katerih vsebino je izpodbijala, in to zgolj v podporo izsledkov iz prve možnosti.
Moreover, that data includes the figure which, according to UFEX and Others, cor responds to the aid stemming from the advantageous conditions of access to La Poste’s counters, even though neither UFEX and Others nor the Bain study (as
Na drugi strani ti podatki zajemajo zneske, ki po mnenju združenja UFEX in drugih pomenijo pomoč, ki naj bi jo pomenili posebni pogoji za dostop do okenc družbe La
CHRONOPOST AND LA POSTE v UFEX AND OTHERS indicated in the contested decision) explain how that figure was calculated.
Poste, čeprav niti združenje UFEX in drugi niti �tudija Bain, kot je navedeno v sporni odločbi, ne pojasnjujejo, kako je bila izračunana.
In those circumstances, the claim in question does not establish the manifestly erroneous nature of the Commission’s assessment of the adequate return on the capital investment relating to the competitive activity.
V teh okoli�činah zadevna trditev ne omogoča ugotovitve, da je presoja Komisije glede ustreznega plačila za kapitalske investicije v zvezi s konkurenčno dejavnostjo očitno napačna.
Finally, it must be observed that the determination of the IRR had no other purpose in the present case than to verify whether La Poste’s behaviour as a shareholder of SFMI-Chronopost was commercially justified under the market economy investor principle.
Nazadnje je treba opozoriti, da je bil namen opredelitve interne stopnje donosnosti v obravnavani zadevi le preveriti, ali je bilo ravnanje družbe La Poste kot delničarja družbe SFMI Chronopost tržno utemeljeno ob upo�tevanju načela tržno usmerjenega investitorja.
In view of that objective, what was important for the Commission was whether the IRR exceeded the normal rate of return that a private investor would require under similar circumstances.
Ob upo�tevanju tega cilja je Komisija �tela za pomembno, ali je interna stopnja donosnosti vi�ja od običajne stopnje donosnosti, ki bi jo pod enakimi pogoji zahteval zasebni investitor.
Therefore, whether that excess is large or small has no bearing on whether the financial transactions which took place between La Poste and its subsidiary included an element of aid.
To, ali je ta presežek bolj ali manj pomemben, ne vpliva na vpra�anje, ali so finančne transakcije, ki so bile izvedene med družbo La Poste in njeno hčerinsko družbo, zajemale kak element pomoči.
The argument of UFEX and Others, alleging an abnormally high IRR, is, therefore, of no consequence in the present case.
Trditev združenja UFEX in drugih v zvezi z nenavadno visoko interno stopnjo donosa je treba v obravnavani zadevi zato zavrniti.
In view of all the foregoing considerations, the plea alleging an error in applying the concept of State aid is unfounded, and the application of UFEX and Others for annulment of the contested decision must therefore be dismissed.
Ob upo�tevanju vseh navedenih ugotovitev tožbeni razlog v zvezi s kr�itvijo pojma državna pomoč ni utemeljen in zato je treba tožbo združenja UFEX in drugih za razglasitev ničnosti sporne odločbe zavrniti.
The first paragraph of Article 122 of the Rules of Procedure provides that, where the appeal is unfounded, or where the appeal is well founded and the Court of Justice itself gives final judgment in the case, it is to make a decision as to costs.
V skladu s členom 122, prvi odstavek, Poslovnika, če pritožba ni utemeljena oziroma če ni utemeljena in če Sodi�če samo dokončno odloči v sporu, odloči tudi o stro�kih.
Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, which applies to appeal proceedings by virtue of Article 118 of those rules, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings.
V skladu s členom 69(2) istega poslovnika, ki se na podlagi člena 118 le-tega uporablja za postopek s pritožbo, se neuspeli stranki naloži plačilo stro�kov, če so bili ti prigla�eni.
The first subparagraph of Article 69(3) of the rules provides, however, that the Court may order that the parties bear their own costs where the circumstances are exceptional.
Vendar člen 69(3), prvi pododstavek, istega poslovnika določa, da lahko Sodi�če v izjemnih okoli�činah odloči, da vsaka stranka nosi svoje stro�ke.
The first subparagraph of Article 69(4) provides that Member States which intervene in the proceedings are to bear their own costs.
Člen 69(4), prvi pododstavek, tega poslovnika določa, da države članice, ki se kot intervenientke udeležijo postopka, nosijo svoje stro�ke.
In view of the background to the case, each of the parties and the French Republic must be ordered to bear their own costs.
Ob upo�tevanju dejanskega stanja v obravnavani zadevi je treba vsaki od strank ter Francoski republiki naložiti svoje stro�ke.
Sets aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 7 June 2006 in Case T-613/97 Ufex and Others v Commission in so far as it (i) annuls Commission Decision 98/365/EC of 1 October 1997 concerning alleged State aid granted by France to SFMI-Chronopost inasmuch as that decision finds that neither the logistical and commercial assistance provided by La Poste to its subsidiary, SFMI-Chronopost, nor the transfer of Postadex constitute State aid to SFMI-Chronopost and (ii) allocates the burden of costs accordingly;
Sodba Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti z dne 7. junija 2006 v zadevi UFEX in drugi proti Komisiji (T-613/97) se razveljavi na eni strani v delu, v katerem je Odločba Komisije 98/365/ES z dne 1. oktobra 1997 v zvezi z domnevno državno pomočjo Francoske republike družbi SFMI-Chronopost razglašena za nično, ker je v njej ugotovljeno, da niti logistična in komercialna podpora družbe La Poste njeni hčerinski družbi, in sicer družbi SFM-Chronopost, niti prenos službe Postadex nista državna pomoč v korist družbe SFMI-Chronopost, in na drugi strani v delu, v katerem so naloženi stroški.
Dismisses the action brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in Case T-613/97;
Tožba pod opravilno številko T-613/97, vložena pri Sodišču prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti, se zavrne.
Orders each of the parties and the French Republic to bear their own costs.
Vse stranke, vključno s Francosko republiko, nosijo svoje stroške.
Case C-49/07
Zadeva C-49/07
(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Diikitiko Efetio Athinon)
(Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, ki ga je vložilo Dioikitiko Efeteio Athinon)
(Articles 82 EC and 86 EC — Concept of ‘undertaking’ — Non-profit-making association representing, in Greece, the International Motorcycling Federation — Concept of ‘economic activity’ — Special legal right to give consent to applications for authorisation to organise motorcycling events — Exercise in parallel of activities such as the organisation of motorcycling events and the conclusion of sponsorship, advertising and insurance contracts)
„Člena 82 ES in 86 ES – Pojem ‚podjetje‘ – Nepridobitno dru�tvo, ki v Grčiji zastopa Mednarodno motociklistično zvezo – Pojem ‚gospodarska dejavnost‘ – Posebna zakonska pravica do izdaje soglasja k vlogi za dovoljenje za organizacijo motociklističnih dirk – Vzporedno izvajanje dejavnosti, kot sta organizacija motociklističnih dirk in sklepanje sponzorskih pogodb, pogodb o ogla�evanju in zavarovalnih pogodb“
Competition — Community rules — Undertaking — Meaning (Arts 81 EC and 82 EC)
Konkurenca – Pravila Skupnosti – Podjetje – Pojem (člena 81 ES in 82 ES)
SUMMARY — CASE C-49/07
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-49/07
Competition — Public undertakings and undertakings to which the Member States grant special or exclusive rights
Konkurenca – Javna podjetja in podjetja, ki jim države članice podelijo posebne ali izključne pravice
(Arts 82 EC and 86 EC)
(člena 82 ES in 86 ES)
being able to impose, on the relevant market, their services to the detriment of those offered by the other operators.
trgu uveljaviti storitve, ki jih ponujajo, v �kodo storitev, ki jih ponujajo drugi izvajalci.
(see paras 22, 23, 26-28)
(Glej točke 22, 23 in od 26 do 28.)
A legal person whose activities consist in organising sports competitions and in entering, in that connection, into sponsorship, advertising and insurance contracts designed to exploit those competitions commercially, and constitute for that entity a source of income, must be classified as an undertaking for the purposes of Community competition law.
Pravna oseba, katere dejavnosti zajemajo organiziranje �portnih tekmovanj in, za namene tržnega izkori�čanja teh tekmovanj, sklepanje sponzorskih pogodb, pogodb o ogla�evanju in zavarovalnih pogodb, ki pomenijo zanjo vir dohodka, mora biti opredeljena kot podjetje v okviru konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti.
The fact that an economic activity has a connection with sport does not hinder the application of the rules of the Treaty, including those governing competition law.
Okoli�čina, da je gospodarska dejavnost povezana s �portom, ni ovira za uporabo določb Pogodbe, med katerimi so tiste, ki urejajo konkurenčno pravo.
Articles 82 EC and 86 EC preclude a national rule which confers on a legal person, which organises sports competitions and enters, in that connection, into sponsorship, advertising and insurance contracts, the power to give consent to applications for authorisation to organise such competitions, without that power being made subject to restrictions, obligations and review.
Člena 82 ES in 86 ES nasprotujeta nacionalni ureditvi, ki podeljuje pravni osebi, ki organizira �portna tekmovanja in v tem okviru sklepa sponzorske pogodbe, pogodbe o ogla�evanju in zavarovalne pogodbe, pooblastilo za izdajo soglasja k vlogi za dovoljenje za organizacijo takih tekmovanj, ne da bi bili določeni meje, obveznosti in nadzor nad izvajanjem tega pooblastila.
That conclusion is not affected by the fact that the entity has the power to give its consent to applications for authorisation submitted to the public authorities to organise competitions, since it is necessary to distinguish the participation of that entity in the decisionmaking process of those authorities and the economic activities in which it engages, such as the organisation and commercial exploitation of competitions.
Ta sklep obvelja tudi, kadar ima podjetje pooblastilo za izdajo soglasja k vlogi za dovoljenje, za organizacijo teh tekmovanj, ki je predložena javnemu organu, ker je treba ločevati med udeležbo tega podjetja v postopku odločanja teh organov in med gospodarskimi dejavnostmi, ki jih izvaja, kot sta organizacija ali gospodarsko izkori�čanje motociklističnih tekmovanj.
Nor does the fact that it does not seek to make a profit, where its offer of goods or ser -vices exists in competition with that of other operators, prevent that conclusion.
Tudi dejstvo, da cilj podjetja ni dobiček, v primeru da je njegova ponudba blaga in storitev konkurenčna ponudbi drugih izvajalcev, ne nasprotuje takemu sklepu.
In this respect, non-profit-making associations which offer goods or services on a given market may find themselves in competition with one another.
Združenja, katerih cilj ni dobiček in ponujajo blago ali storitve na določenem trgu, se lahko znajdejo v konkurenčnem položaju.
The success or economic survival of such associations depends ultimately on their
Uspeh ali gospodarsko preživetje takih združenj je namreč dolgoročno odvisno od njihovih zmogljivosti na zadevnem
A system of undistorted competition, such as that provided for by the Treaty, can be guaranteed only if equality of opportunity is secured as between the various economic operators.
Sistem neizkrivljene konkurence, kot ga predvideva Pogodba, je namreč lahko zagotovljen le, če so različnim gospodarskim subjektom zagotovljene enake možnosti.
To entrust a legal person, which itself organises and commercially exploits sports competitions, the task of giving the competent administration its consent to applications for authorisation to organise such competitions, is tantamount de facto to conferring upon it the power to designate
Zaupati pravni osebi, ki sama organizira in tržno izkori�ča �portna tekmovanja, nalogo, da izda upravnemu organu soglasje k vlogi za dovoljenje za organizacijo takih tekmovanj, pomeni de facto podeliti ji pooblastilo, da določi osebe, poobla�čene za organizacijo navedenih tekmovanj, in pogoje,
MOTOE distort competition by favouring competitions which it organises or those in whose organisation it participates.
MOTOE tekmovanjem, ki jih samo organizira ali pri katerih sodeluje.
the persons authorised to organise those competitions and to set the conditions in which those events are organised, thereby placing that entity at an obvious advantage over its competitors.
v katerih se ta organizirajo, ter s tem podeliti tej organizaciji očitno prednost pred njenimi konkurenti.
Such a right may therefore lead the undertaking which possesses it to deny other operators access to the relevant market or to
Podjetje, ki ima tako pravico, lahko tako prepreči dostop drugih izvajalcev na zadevni trg ali izkrivlja konkurenco, s tem da daje prednost
(see paras 51-53, operative part)
(Glej točke od 51 do 53 in izrek.)
I — Introduction organise on its own responsibility a number of motorcycling events in Greece in 2000, it obtained no authorisation for them because ELPA did not declare its consent to the competent authority.
I – Uvod na lastno odgovornost prirediti niz motociklističnih dirk, za to ni dobil dovoljenja, ker ELPA pristojnemu organu ni sporočila svojega soglasja.
In this case, the Court of Justice is once again faced with the question of what requirements under European competition law are applicable in the field of sport.
V obravnavani zadevi je sodi�če ponovno soočeno z vpra�anjem, katere zahteve izhajajo iz evropskega konkurenčnega prava na področju �porta.
The focus of interest here is the dual role performed by the Greek automobile and touring club ELPA 2 in connection with motor sports events.
Pri tem je v sredi�ču dvojna vloga, ki jo igra gr�ki avtomobilski in potovalni klub ELPA 2 v zvezi s �portnimi prireditvami na področju motociklističnega �porta.
From the point of view of competition, this raises the question whether a dual role such as that performed by ELPA is compatible with Article 82 EC and Article 86 EC.
Z vidika konkurenčnega prava se zastavlja vpra�anje, ali je dvojna vloga, kakr�no ima ELPA, združljiva s členoma 82 ES in 86 ES.
However, it must first be asked whether and to what extent the activity of a non-profit-making organisation such as ELPA in the field of sport is covered by Community competition law at all.
Najprej pa je pri tem vsekakor treba obravnavati, ali in v kolik�ni meri se konkurenčno pravo Skupnosti sploh nana�a na dejavnost nepridobitne organizacije na področju �porta, kakr�na je ELPA.
EPLA’s dual role may be described as follows: on the one hand, ELPA is responsible in Greece for the organisation of motor sports competitions; for this purpose ELPA has created a National Motorcycle-Racing Committee (ETHEAM 3) and entrusted it with supervising and organising motorcycling events.
To dvojno vlogo ELPE je mogoče opisati tako: po eni strani prevzema ELPA v Grčiji prirejanje tekmovanj na področju motociklističnega �porta; v ta namen je ELPA ustanovila nacionalno komisijo za motociklistične dirke (ETHEAM 3) ter ji zaupala nadzor in prirejanje motociklističnih dirk.
On the other hand, ELPA also participates in the authorisation by a public body of motorcycling events, which, under Greek law, can be issued only with ELPA’s consent.
Po drugi strani pa ELPA sodeluje tudi pri upravnih dovoljenjih za motociklistične dirke, ki se po gr�ki zakonodaji lahko izdajo le v soglasju z ELPO.
When MOTOE sought to
Ko je MOTOE leta 2000 v Grčiji hotel
The relevant Community legislation in this case is made up of the competition rules contained in Articles 82 EC and 86 EC.
Pravni okvir Skupnosti v tej zadevi je določen s pravili o konkurenci iz členov 82 ES in 86 ES.