natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As to the availability of judgments in the new languages, the first indications are very encouraging: thus one might mention, as an example, that, for the judgments delivered on 16 December 2004, approximately 85% of the translations into the new languages were available on the date of the judgment.
Glede razpoložljivosti sodb v novih jezikih so prvi kazalniki zelo spodbudni: tako lahko za primer omenimo, da je bilo za sodbe, razglašene dne 16. decembra 2004, še istega dne na voljo okoli 85 % prevodov v nove jezike.
At general administrative level, the impact of enlargement was no less significant.
Vpliv širitve je bil enako pomemben tudi na splošnem upravnem področju.
The staff of the Court increased by about 50% in 2004.
V letu 2004 se je število zaposlenih v instituciji povečalo za okoli 50 %.
Special efforts were made for the recruitment of staff, and a number of changes were made in the organisation and functioning of the departments of the Court, listing which would go beyond the objectives of this part of the Annual Report.
Poseben trud je bil potreben v zvezi z zaposlovanjem osebja, več sprememb, katerih naštevanje bi preseglo namen tega dela letnega poročila, pa je bilo potrebnih v zvezi z organizacijo in delovanjem služb institucije.
First, by Decision 2004/407/EC, Euratom amending Articles 51 and 54 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice (OJ 2004 L 132, p. 5, corrigendum at OJ 2004 L 194, p.
Po eni strani je Svet s sklepom 2004/407/ES, Euratom, z dne 26. aprila 2004 o spremembah členov 51 in 54 Protokola o statutu Sodišča (UL L 132, str.
3), the Council transferred to the Court of First Instance certain jurisdiction which had previously been reserved to the Court of Justice.
5) na Sodišče prve stopnje prenesel nekatere pristojnosti, ki so bile do takrat pridržane Sodišču.
The Court of First Instance has thus acquired jurisdiction over direct actions for annulment and for failure to act brought by the Member States against:
Sodišče prve stopnje je tako postalo pristojno za direktne ničnostne tožbe in tožbe zaradi nedelovanja, ki jih države članice vložijo zoper:
Ø decisions of the Council concerning State aid;
 sklepe Sveta o državnih pomočeh;
Ø acts of the Council adopted pursuant to a Council regulation concerning measures to protect trade;
 akte Sveta, sprejete v skladu z Uredbo Sveta o ukrepih za zaščito trgovine;
Ø acts of the Council by which it directly exercises implementing powers;
 akte Sveta, s katerimi Svet uresničuje izvedbena pooblastila;
Ø acts of the European Central Bank, and acts of the Commission with the exception of those that concern enhanced cooperation under the EC Treaty.
 akte Evropske centralne banke in akte Komisije, razen aktov, ki se nanašajo na tesnejše sodelovanje v okviru Pogodbe (o ustanovitvi) Evropske skupnosti.
The cases transferred to the Court of First Instance on this basis may be estimated quantitatively at approximately 5% of the cases before the Court of Justice (25 cases pending before the Court of Justice were transferred to the Court of First Instance in 2004).
Spore, ki so bili na tej podlagi odstopljeni Sodišču prve stopnje, količinsko ocenjujemo na okoli 5 % sporov pred Sodiščem (Sodišču prve stopnje je bilo leta 2004 odstopljenih petindvajset nerešenih zadev pred Sodiščem).
Proceedings
Sodišče
By Decision 2004/752/EC, Euratom of 2 November 2004 (OJ 2004 L 333, p. 7), it established the European Union Civil Service Tribunal.
Dejavnost v posameznem letu), Sodišče pa pritožb, povezanih z navedenimi spori (okoli 10 % zadev, vloženih v posameznem letu).
The result was the adoption of a series of measures which were put into practice progressively from May 2004.
Slednje je vodilo do sprejema vrste ukrepov, ki so se postopoma začeli uporabljati od maja 2004.
Among the most important of those measures is, first, the putting in place of a more rigorous system for managing the Court’s judicial work.
Med najpomembnejšimi ukrepi je uvedba strožjega sledenja dela, povezanega s sodno dejavnostjo Sodišča.
That system is ensured with the aid of computer tools developed specially for the purpose.
Sledenje je zagotavljeno z informacijskim orodjem, razvitim posebej za ta namen.
In addition, to speed up the written procedure in direct actions and appeals, the Court has decided to adopt a much stricter approach to granting extensions of time-limits for submitting pleadings.
Poleg tega se je Sodišče, da bi pospešilo pisni postopek v postopkih z direktno tožbo in pritožbenimi postopki, odločilo za sprejem znatno strožjega pristopa, kar zadeva možnost podaljšanja rokov za predložitev vlog.
Moreover, the Reports for the Hearing drawn up by the Judge-Rapporteur are now drafted in a shorter and more summary form and contain only the essential elements of the case.
Poleg tega so poročila za obravnavo od tedaj sestavljena v krajši in bolj zgoščeni obliki ter vsebujejo samo najbolj bistvene elemente zadeve.
Where the procedure in a case, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure, does not require an oral hearing, a report of the Judge-Rapporteur is no longer produced.
Če se postopek v zadevi skladno z določbami Poslovnika izvede brez ustne obravnave, sodnik poročevalec ne sestavi več poročila za obravnavo.
In accordance with the wording of Article 20 of the Statute of the Court, such a report is compulsory only where a hearing takes place.
Pravzaprav je v skladu z besedilom člena 20 Statuta Sodišča sestava poročila obvezna le takrat, ko se opravi obravnava.
Finally, the Court has re-examined its practice of publishing judgments in the European Court Reports.
Končno se je Sodišče ukvarjalo tudi s prakso objavljanja sodb v Zbirki odločb.
Two factors were identified at the centre of the problem.
V središču problematike sta dva elementa.
First, it was found that the volume of the Reports, which exceeded 12 000 pages in 2002 and 13 000 pages in 2003, is liable seriously to compromise the accessibility of the case-law.
Sodišče je ugotovilo, da Zbirka odločb, ki je leta 2002 presegla 12.000 strani in leta 2003 13.000 strani, lahko resno ogrozi dostopnost sodne prakse.
Second, all judgments published in the Reports necessarily have to be translated into all the official languages of the Union, which represents a substantial workload for the Court’s translation department.
Po drugi strani je treba vse sodbe, ki se objavijo v Zbirki odločb, prevesti v vse uradne jezike Unije, kar za prevajalsko službo Sodišča pomeni precejšnjo obremenitev.
Given that not all the judgments it delivers are equally significant from the point of view of the development of Community law, the Court, after careful consideration, decided to adopt a policy of selective publication of its decisions in the European Court Reports.
Glede na to, da vse sodbe, ki jih sprejme Sodišče, nimajo enakega pomena na področju razvoja prava Skupnosti, je Sodišče po temeljitem preudarku odločilo, da bo sprejelo politiko selektivnega objavljanja odločb v Zbirki odločb.
In an initial stage, as regards direct actions and appeals, judgments will no longer be published in the Reports if they come from a Chamber of three judges, or from a Chamber of five judges if, pursuant to the last paragraph of Article 20 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, the case is decided without an Opinion of the Advocate General.
Najprej, kar zadeva direktne tožbe in pritožbe, se sodbe, ki jih izdajo senati treh sodnikov ali senati petih sodnikov v zadevah, v katerih se v skladu s členom 20, zadnji odstavek, Statuta Sodišča, odloči brez sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca, ne objavijo v Zbirki odločb. V izjemnih okoliščinah pa je pri oblikovanju sodbe mogoče vselej odločiti, da se taka odločba v celoti ali delno objavi.
It will, however, be open to the formation giving judgment to decide to publish such a decision in whole or in part in exceptional circumstances.
Razbremenitev služb Sodišča za prevajanje, ki je sledila sprejemu politike selektivnega objavljanja sodb, je bila opazna že leta 2004.
It must be noted that texts of the decisions not published in the Reports will still be accessible to the public in electronic form in the language or languages available.
1.4 Zaradi preudarka o poteku postopkov in metodah dela je Sodišče, še vedno v skrbi za skrajšanje trajanja postopkov, predlagalo določene spremembe svojega Poslovnika.
One decision amending the Rules of Procedure was, however, adopted in 2004.
Odločitev o spremembi Poslovnika je bila sprejeta leta 2004.
As a result of the accession of the new Member States, and in view of the fact that the Council had amended the provision of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice concerning the number of judges in the Grand Chamber, the Court consequently adjusted the provisions of the Rules of Procedure relating to the composition of that formation of the Court.
Zaradi pristopa novih držav članic in upoštevajoč dejstvo, da je Svet spremenil določbo Protokola o statutu Sodišča o številu sodnikov, članov velikega senata, je Sodišče prilagodilo določbe Poslovnika o sestavi sodečega senata.
The Grand Chamber thus now consists of 13 judges.
Tako veliki senat od zdaj sestavlja 13 sodnikov.
The cumulative effect of the measures taken to improve the efficiency of the methods of work of the Court, the implementation of the changes made by the Treaty of Nice to the working of the Court, and the arrival of 10 new judges following enlargement is clearly visible in the Court’s judicial statistics for 2004.
Skupni učinek sprejetih ukrepov, namenjenih povečanju učinkovitosti metod dela Sodišča, uvedbe sprememb pri delovanju Sodišča, ki jih je prinesla Pogodba iz Nice, in prihoda desetih novih sodnikov po širitvi se jasno kaže v sodnih statistikah Sodišča za leto 2004.
The number of cases brought to a close increased by approximately 30%, that of cases pending fell by about 14%, and there was a considerable improvement in the duration of proceedings before the Court.
Opozorimo naj na 30-odstotno povečanje zaključenih zadev, zmanjšanje števila nerešenih zadev za 14 % in znatno skrajšanje trajanja postopkov pred Sodiščem.
In particular, the Court brought 603 cases to a close in 2004 (net figure, taking account of joined cases).
Predvsem je Sodišče leta 2004 zaključilo 603 zadeve (končna številka, upoštevajoč združitve).
Of those cases, 375 were dealt with by judgments and 226 gave rise to orders.
V 375 med njimi je odločilo s sodbo in v 226 zadevah s sklepom.
Those figures show a considerable increase over the previous year (455 cases brought to a close).
Glede na prejšnje leto (455 zaključenih zadev) pomenijo te številke znatno povečanje.
The Court had 531 new cases brought before it (561 in 2003, gross figures).
Na Sodišče je prispelo 531 novih zadev (561 v letu 2003, skupno število).
There were 840 cases (gross figure) pending at the end of 2004, compared with 974 at the end of 2003.
Nerešenih zadev je bilo v letu 2004 840 (skupno število), medtem ko jih je bilo do konca leta 2003 974.
The upward trend in the length of proceedings observed during previous years changed in 2004.
Težnja po podaljševanju postopkov, ki jo je bilo mogoče opaziti v zadnjih letih, je v letu 2004 doživela preobrat.
As regards references for preliminary rulings, the length was approximately 23 months, whereas it was approximately 25 months in 2003.
Postopek s predhodnimi vprašanji je trajal okoli 23 mesecev, medtem ko je leta 2003 trajal okoli 25 mesecev.
As regards direct actions, it fell from 25 months in 2003 to 20 months in 2004.
Čas trajanja postopka z direktnimi tožbami se je s 25 mesecev v letu 2003 znižal na 20 mesecev v letu 2004.
The average time taken to deal with appeals was 21 months (compared with 28 months in 2003).
Povprečni čas za obravnavanje pritožb je bil 21 mesecev (28 mesecev v letu 2003).
As in the preceding year, the Court made use in 2004 of the various instruments at its disposal to expedite the treatment of certain cases (priority treatment, the accelerated or expedited procedure, the simplified procedure, and the possibility of giving judgment without an Opinion of the Advocate General).
Tako kot v prejšnjem letu je Sodišče v letu 2004 uporabljalo različne instrumente za pospešitev postopka v določenih zadevah (prednostno obravnavanje zadeve, hitri postopek, skrajšani postopek in možnost odločanja brez sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca).
For the third time, the Court made use of the expedited or accelerated procedure provided for in Articles 62a and 104a of the Rules of Procedure, but this time in a direct action (judgment of 13 July 2004 in Case C-27/04 P Commission v Council, not yet published in the ECR, see section 3.11).
Sodišče je skladno s členoma 62a in 104a Poslovnika že tretjič odločilo po hitrem postopku, vendar tokrat v postopku z direktno tožbo (sodba z dne 13. julija 2004 v zadevi Komisija proti Svetu, C-27/04 P, še neobjavljena v ZOdl., glej oddelek 3.11).
As this instrument makes it possible to omit certain stages in the procedure, it was possible
Ugotavljamo težnjo naraščanja števila zadev, o katerih odločajo senati petih
There is a tendency for cases heard by Chambers of five judges to increase in number (50% of cases brought to a close in 2002).
Dejavnost sodnikov (v 50 % v letu 2002 zaključenih zadev).
Five-judge Chambers are thus becoming the usual formation for hearing the cases brought before the Court.
Senati petih sodnikov so tudi sestava, ki navadno odloča o zadevah, vloženih pred Sodiščem.
The substantial increase in the number of cases heard by Chambers of three judges should also be pointed out (20% of cases brought to a close in 2003).
Prav tako je treba opozoriti na občutno povečanje števila zadev, v katerih odločajo senati treh sodnikov (20 % zaključenih zadev v letu 2003).
For further information on the statistics for the 2004 judicial year, the reader is referred to Chapter IV of this Report.
Drugi statistični podatki za leto 2004 so zbrani v poglavju IV tega poročila.
It is, however, the judicial activity of the Court that I wish more particularly to dwell on in this Annual Report.
V vsakem primeru bi se želeli v tem letnem poročilu zlasti zadržati pri sodni dejavnosti Sodišča.
This section presents the main developments in the case-law, arranged by subject-matter as follows: law of the institutions (section 3.1); European citizenship (section 3.2); free movement of goods (section 3.3); freedom of movement for workers (section 3.4); freedom to provide services (section 3.5); free movement of capital (section 3.6); competition rules (section 3.7); trade mark law (section 3.8); harmonisation of laws (section 3.9); social law (section 3.10); economic and monetary policy (section 3.11).
Ta oddelek opisuje poglavitne razvojne težnje sodne prakse, razvrščene po področjih: pravo institucij (oddelek 3.1); državljanstvo Unije (oddelek 3.2); prosti pretok blaga (oddelek 3.3); prosto gibanje delavcev (oddelek 3.4); svoboda opravljanja storitev (oddelek 3.5); prosti pretok kapitala (oddelek 3.6); pravila o konkurenci (oddelek 3.7); pravo znamk (oddelek 3.8); približevanje zakonodaje (oddelek 3.9); socialno pravo (oddelek 3.10); ekonomska in monetarna politika (oddelek 3.11).
This selection covers only 34 of the 603 judgments and orders handed down by the Court in 2004.
Izbor ne obsega več kot 34 od 603 sodb in sklepov, ki jih je izdalo Sodišče v letu 2004.
They are, however, presented more fully than in previous editions of the Annual Report of the Court.
Kljub temu so navedene zadeve opisane izčrpneje kot v predhodnih izdajah letnega poročila Sodišča.
While the selection naturally includes judgments of major importance in cases where an Opinion was written by the Advocate General, for purely practical reasons connected with the length of this Report those Opinions, which are nevertheless essential for understanding the issues at stake in a case, are not addressed here.
Tudi če ta izbor očitno povzema sodbe posebnega pomena, v katerih je generalni pravobranilec sestavil sklepne predloge, predmetnih sklepnih predlogov, čeprav nujnih za razumevanje zadeve, tu ne obravnavamo zgolj iz praktičnih razlogov, povezanih z dolžino tega poročila.
The full texts of all the judgments, opinions and orders of the Court published in the European Court Reports, as well as the Opinions of the Advocates General, are available in all the official languages of the Communities on the Court’s internet site (www.curia.eu.int) and the Europa site (www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex).
Celotna besedila vseh sodb, mnenj in sklepnih predlogov generalnih pravobranilcev so v vseh uradnih jezikih Skupnosti na voljo na spletni strani www.curia.eu.int, pa tudi na spletni strani Evropa (www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex).
In order to avoid any confusion and to assist the reader, this Report refers, unless otherwise stated, to the numbering of the articles of the Treaty on European Union and the EC Treaty established by the Treaty of Amsterdam.
Da bi se izognili kakršni koli pomoti in da bi olajšali branje, se to poročilo, kadar ni navedeno drugače, sklicuje na oštevilčenje členov Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe ES, ki je bilo uvedeno z Amsterdamsko pogodbo.
In Case C-233/02 France v Commission [2004] ECR I-2759 the Court dismissed the action brought by France for annulment of the act by which the Commission had concluded an agreement with the United States on guidelines intended to improve regulatory cooperation between the two parties and to promote transparency towards third parties in connection with the adoption of technical rules concerning goods covered by the WTO/TBT Agreement (the World Trade Organisation’s Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade).
Sodišče pojasnjuje, da „določanje pogojev, pod katerimi se sme sprejeti tak akt, zahteva, ko gre za akt, s katerim se v tem primeru zmanjšuje nevarnost trenj, povezanih z obstojem tehničnih ovir pri trgovanju, da se primerno upošteva delitev pristojnosti in institucionalno ravnovesje, ki ga na področju skupne trgovinske politike vzpostavlja Pogodba“ (točka 40).
The French Government’s main argument was that the Commission had itself concluded, in the form of guidelines, a binding international agreement, whereas the conclusion of such an act is normally within the exclusive competence of the Council by virtue of Article 300 EC.
Sodišče dalje pojasnjuje, da je „odločilno merilo za določanje, ali so smernice pravno zavezujoče ali ne,“ namen strank (točka 42). V nadaljevanju Sodišče analizira besedilo in zaključi, da v konkretnem primeru smernice očitno nimajo obvezne veljave in jih zato, logično, člen 300 Pogodbe ES ne zajema.
The Commission submitted, on the other hand, that the guidelines had no binding force, and that that on its own was enough to confer competence on it to adopt them.
Sodišče je institucijo, pristojno za sklenitev predmetnega sporazuma, lahko določilo na podlagi analize konkretnega primera, torej tako, da je akt postavilo v njegov kontekst.
It rejected the argument of the French Government without altogether agreeing with the Commission.
V zadevi Kühne in Heitz (sodba z dne 13. januarja 2004, C-453/00, Recueil, str.
The fact that a measure such as the guidelines at issue in the case is not binding is not sufficient to confer on the Commission the competence to adopt it. The Court said that ‘determining the conditions under which such a measure may be adopted requires that the division of powers and the institutional balance established by the Treaty in the field of the common commercial policy be duly taken into account, since in this case the measure seeks to reduce the risk of conflict related to the existence of technical barriers to trade in goods’ (paragraph 40).
I-837) je College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Nizozemska) v okviru spora o tarifni razvrstitvi perutnine in posledično o določitvi zneskov za povračila pri izvozu izvozniku zaprosilo Sodišče za odgovor na vprašanje, ali pravo Skupnosti, in predvsem načelo lojalnosti Skupnosti iz člena 10 ES, upravnemu organu nalaga, naj spremeni dokončno odločbo, tako da bi zagotovil pravu Skupnosti, ki ga je treba razlagati v luči poznejše predhodne odločbe, njegov polni učinek.
The lack of binding force is not therefore the exclusive criterion of competence, allowing the Commission to adopt measures such as the guidelines.
Potem ko je bil njen ugovor zoper zahtevo za povračilo zavrnjen, je izvozna družba vložila pritožbo zoper to odločbo pred College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.
Account must also be taken of the division of powers and the institutional balance established by the Treaty in the field in question.
Ko je leta leta 1991 zavrnil pritožbo, pri tem ni sodil, da bi bilo treba na Sodišče nasloviti predlog za sprejem predhodne odločbe, saj se za predmetno blago ni uporabljalo pojma „stegna“ v smislu podštevilke, ki jo je v izjavi navedel izvoznik.
The Court then stated that the intention of the parties must be ‘the decisive criterion for the purpose of determining whether or not the Guidelines are binding’ (paragraph 42).
Na podlagi poznejše sodne prakse Sodišča, ki je razveljavila rešitev nizozemskih Sodišč (sodba z dne 5. oktobra 1994 Voogd Vleesimport en -export, C-151/93, Recueil, str.
Carrying out an analysis of the wording, the Court reached the conclusion that in this case the guidelines clearly have no binding force, and are therefore logically not concerned by Article 300 EC.
I-4915), je izvoznik zahteval plačilo zavrnjenih nadomestil in sodišče, ki je znova odločalo o tožbi zoper zavrnitev te zahteve s strani uprave, je na Sodišče naslovilo zgoraj navedeno vprašanje.
It was thus from an analysis in concreto, that is to say, of the measure seen in its context, that the Court was able to determine the institution with competence to conclude the agreement at issue.
Na začetku Sodišče opozarja, da morajo, upoštevaje po eni strani obveznost, ki jo imajo vsi organi držav članic, da zagotovijo spoštovanje prava Skupnosti, in po drugi strani
From December 1986 to December 1987 Kühne & Heitz NV, a company established in the Netherlands, exported quantities of poultrymeat parts to nonmember countries and made various declarations to the Netherlands customs authorities with a view to obtaining export refunds for consignments of poultrymeat. Those goods were declared under a particular subheading of the Common Customs Tariff. On the basis of those declarations, the Productschap voor Pluimvee- en Eieren granted export refunds under that subheading and paid the exporting company the relevant amounts. After carrying out checks as to the nature of the goods exported, the Productschap reclassified them under a different tariff subheading, following which it ordered the exporting company to repay a certain sum.
Ko gre za spoštovanje navedene obveznosti, je po mnenju Sodišča ne glede na nacionalno upravno odločbo, ki je postala dokončna, preden je bila v luči predhodne odločbe Sodišča vložena zahteva za njeno ponovno presojo, treba upoštevati tudi načelo pravne varnosti, ki je eno izmed splošnih načel prava Skupnosti.
The company’s complaint against the demand for reimbursement was rejected, and it appealed against that rejection to the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven. The latter dismissed the appeal in 1991 without finding it necessary to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice, on the ground that the goods in question were not covered by the term ‘legs’ within the meaning of the subheading stated in the exporter’s declaration.
V zadevnem primeru se je Sodišču posrečilo najti način, kako med seboj spraviti obe omenjeni zahtevi, in sicer tako, da ugotavlja, prvič, da nizozemsko pravo upravnim organom omogoča, da spremenijo dokončno odločbo, drugič, da postane dokončna zgolj na podlagi sodbe nacionalnega sodišča, zoper odločbe katerega ni pravnega sredstva, tretjič, da je ta sodba temeljila na razlagi prava Skupnosti, ki je bila s poznejšo sodbo Sodišča razglašena za napačno in se je ni več uporabljalo, ne da bi bil na Sodišče naslovljen predlog za sprejem predhodne odločbe v skladu s členom 234(3) ES, in končno, da se je prizadeta stranka nemudoma po tem, ko je izvedela za predmetno sodno prakso, obrnila na upravni organ.