natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
While the purpose of that directive is to promote parttime work, the national provisions at issue pursue the opposite objective, since the mandatory notification of parttime employment contracts is a bureaucratic obstacle to that form of organisation of work.
Medtem ko je namen te direktive pospe�evanje zaposlitev s kraj�im delovnim časom, imajo zadevne nacionalne določbe nasproten namen, saj je obveznost po�iljanja pogodb o zaposlitvi s kraj�im delovnim časom pomenila birokratsko oviro za ta način organizacije dela.
By making the cost of parttime work more expensive, the effect of those provisions is also to bring about unequal treatment and a restriction of competition to the advantage of undertakings employing fulltime workers.
Te določbe so s tem, da so podražile stro�ek zaposlitve s kraj�im delovnim časom, povzročile neenako obravnavanje in omejevanje konkurence, ki sta v korist podjetjem, ki zaposlujejo delavce s polnim delovnim časom.
In those circumstances the Landesgericht Bozen decided to stay proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
V teh okoli�činah je Landesgericht Bozen prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo to vpra�anje:
‘Are national provisions (Articles 2 and 8 of Decree-Law No 61/2000) which impose an obligation on employers to send a copy of parttime employment contracts within 30 days of their signature to the competent provincial office of the Labour Inspectorate, which provide for imposition of a fine of EUR 15 in respect of each worker concerned and each day of delay in the event of failure to do so, and which do not set an upper limit for the administrative fine … contrary to Community law provisions and Directive 97/81 …?’
„Ali sta določbi nacionalnega prava (člena 2 in 8 zakonske uredbe �t. 61/2000), ki delodajalcu nalagata obveznost, da pristojni pokrajinski direkciji in�pektorata za delo v tridesetih dneh od sklenitve pogodb o zaposlitvi s kraj�im delovnim časom po�lje kopije navedenih pogodb, ter ob opustitvi po�iljanja nalagata kazen v vi�ini 15 EUR za vsakega zadevnega delavca in za vsak dan zamude, ne da bi bila določena zgornja meja upravne kazni […], združljivi z določbami prava Skupnosti in z Direktivo 97/81/ES […]?“
By order of the President of the Court of Justice of 18 April 2007 Cases C-55/07 and C-56/07 were joined for those of the purposes of the written and oral procedures and also for judgment.
S sklepom predsednika Sodi�ča z dne 18. aprila 2007 sta bili zadevi C-55/07 in C-56/07 združeni za pisni in ustni postopek ter izdajo skupne sodbe.
The Italian Government maintains that the objective pursued by Decree-Law No 61/2000 is the same as that of Directive 97/81 which it transposes into the national legal system, in other words, the protection and encouragement of parttime work.
Italijanska vlada trdi, da sta cilja zakonske uredbe �t. 61/2000 enaka cilju Direktive 97/81, katere prenos v nacionalni pravni red ta zakonska uredba zagotavlja, in sicer varstvo in spodbujanje zaposlitve s kraj�im delovnim časom.
From that point of view, the obligation to give notice of parttime employment contracts is instrumental in ensuring the coordinated action of all of the bodies responsible for the monitoring of work in Italy.
S tega stali�ča je obveznost po�iljanja pogodb o zaposlitvi s kraj�im delovnim časom sredstvo za zagotavljanje koordinacije dejavnosti vseh organov, ki so zadolženi za in�pekcijo dela v Italiji.
The measure is one which contributes to combating undeclared work and which ensures that the various bodies which monitor work have an up-to-date database of information on market practices.
Gre za ukrep, ki prispeva k boju proti delu na črno in ki omogoča različnim službam in�pektorata za delo, da so s pomočjo podatkovne baze seznanjeni z ravnanji na trgu.
Far from erecting a bureaucratic obstacle, the measure, it is argued, represents a guarantee to employers of transparency and is of use in combating unlawful work.
Daleč od tega, da bi �lo za birokratsko oviro, ta ukrep delodajalcem omogoča zagotavljanje preglednosti in je namenjen boju proti nezakonitemu delu.
Such a formality does not, moreover, create any inequality or any distortion of competition between enterprises.
Taka formalnost pa ne vpliva niti na nezakonitost niti na izkrivljanje konkurence med podjetji.
The Commission of the European Communities considers that the obligation, on penalty of a fine, to notify the Labour Inspectorate of the contracts concerned fails to have regard to the objectives of Directive 97/81.
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti meni, da obveznost po�iljanja zadevnih pogodb in�pektoratu za delo, katere nespo�tovanje se kaznuje z denarno kaznijo, ne upo�teva cilja Direktive 97/81.
The purpose of that directive was, first, to remove any discrimination against parttime workers and, secondly, to facilitate the development of parttime work, inter alia, by the elimination of any obstacles which might discourage undertakings from making use of that form of work.
Cilja te direktive sta bila odprava diskriminacije delavcev, ki delajo s kraj�im delovnim časom, in olaj�anje razvoja dela s kraj�im delovnim časom, med drugim z odpravo ovir, ki lahko podjetja odvrnejo, da bi zaposlovala v taki obliki zaposlitve.
Directive 97/81 required that parttime work be treated in the same way as fulltime work, whether in relation to working conditions or to access to employment.
Direktiva 97/81 je zahtevala, da se zaposlitev s kraj�im delovnim časom obravnava enako kot zaposlitev s polnim delovnim časom, tako glede delovnih razmer kot glede dostopa do dela.
Clause 5 of the framework agreement accordingly precludes the creation of obstacles which are not justified by objective reasons.
Tako je določba 5 okvirnega sporazuma nasprotovala ustvarjanju ovir, ki niso upravičene s stvarnimi razlogi.
In the recitals in its preamble, the directive refers to establishing a general framework for the elimination of any discrimination against parttime workers and the development of opportunities for parttime work.
V teh uvodnih izjavah se ta direktiva sklicuje na postavitev splo�nega okvira za odpravo diskriminacij glede delavcev, ki delajo s kraj�im delovnim časom, in glede razvoja možnosti zaposlitve s kraj�im delovnim časom.
Paragraph 5 of the general considerations of the framework agreement sets out the duty to facilitate access for men and women to parttime work.
Točka 5 splo�nih razlogov okvirnega sporazuma določa, da je treba olaj�ati dostop do dela s kraj�im delovnim časom za mo�ke in ženske.
While it falls to the national court to determine whether the measure at issue is justified by objective reasons, the Commission questions whether such reasons exist in this case.
Čeprav mora nacionalno sodi�če presojati, ali zadevni ukrep upravičujejo objektivni razlogi, Komisija dvomi, da so ti razlogi v tem primeru obstajali.
In the present case, the system of penalties is said to be draconian, since there is no ceiling to the fines.
V tem primeru naj bi bil sistem kazni zelo strog, saj za globe niso določeni nobeni zgornji zneski.
Lastly, the Commission considers that it is unnecessary to examine whether the effect of the national measure at issue is discriminatory against women, since that matter is not related sufficiently closely to the main proceedings.
Nazadnje Komisija ocenjuje, da ni treba presojati, ali ima nacionalni ukrep diskriminatorni učinek glede žensk, ker to vpra�anje ni dovolj povezano s postopkom v glavni stvari.
The objective of Directive 97/81 and the framework agreement is, first, to promote parttime work and, secondly, to eliminate discrimination between parttime workers and fulltime workers.
Namen Direktive 97/81 in okvirnega sporazuma je pospe�evati zaposlitev s kraj�im delovnim časom in odpraviti diskriminacijo med delavci, ki delajo s kraj�im delovnim časom, in delavci, ki delajo s polnim delovnim časom.
That twofold objective is clear from the terms of Clause 1 of the framework agreement (see paragraph 5 of this judgment) and from the recitals in the preamble to Directive 97/81.
Ta dvojni namen izhaja iz besedila določbe 1 okvirnega sporazuma (glej točko 5 te sodbe) in iz uvodnih izjav Direktive 97/81.
It can be observed that Recital 5 in the preamble to that directive states that ‘the conclusions of the Essen European Council stressed the need to take measures to promote employment and equal opportunities for women and men, and called for measures with a view to increasing the employment-intensiveness of growth, in particular by a more flexible organisation of work in a way which fulfils both the wishes of employees and the requirements of competition.’
Opozoriti je treba, da peta uvodna izjava te direktive določa, da „je Evropski svet v zaključkih zasedanja v Essnu poudaril potrebo po ukrepih za pospe�evanje zaposlovanja in enakih možnosti žensk in mo�kih in pozval k ukrepom za povečanje zaposlitvene intenzivnosti rasti, zlasti s prožnej�o organizacijo dela, ki pa mora izpolnjevati želje zaposlenih in ustrezati zahtevam konkurence“.
In addition, according to Recital 11 in the preamble to that directive, the signatories to the framework agreement ‘have demonstrated their desire to establish a general framework for eliminating discrimination against parttime workers and to contribute to developing the potential for parttime work on a basis which is acceptable for employers and workers alike’.
Poleg tega iz enajste uvodne izjave te direktive izhaja, da so podpisnice okvirnega sporazuma „želele določiti splo�en okvir za odpravo diskriminacije delavcev, zaposlenih s kraj�im delovnim časom, in prispevati k razvoju možnosti za delo s kraj�im delovnim časom na taki podlagi, ki je sprejemljiva za delodajalce in delavce“.
Lastly, according to Recital 18 in the preamble to that direct- ive, ‘the Commission has drafted its proposal for a Directive in compliance with Article 2(2) of the Agreement on social policy [concluded by the Member States of the European Community with the exception of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (OJ 1992 C 191, p.
Nazadnje je v osemnajsti uvodni izjavi te direktive določeno, da „je Komisija pripravila predlog direktive v skladu s členom 2(2) Sporazuma o socialni politiki [sklenjen med državami članicami Evropske skupnosti razen Združenega kraljestva Velika Britanija in Severna Irska (UL 1992, C 191, str. 91), ki je priloga k Protokolu (�t.
In accordance with the objective of promoting parttime work, Clause 5(1)(a) of the framework agreement provides that Member States are obliged to ‘identify and review obstacles of a legal or administrative nature which may limit the opportunities for parttime work and, where appropriate, eliminate them’.
V skladu z namenom pospe�evanja zaposlitev s kraj�im delovnim časom določba 5(1)(a) okvirnega sporazuma določa, da morajo države članice „opredeliti in presoditi zakonske ali administrativne ovire, ki lahko omejujejo možnosti za delo s kraj�im delovnim časom, in jih, kjer je primerno, odpraviti“.
Clearly Article 2 of Decree-Law No 61/2000, by requiring undertakings to send to the competent authorities a copy of every parttime employment contract, sets up an administrative obstacle likely to limit the opportunities for parttime work, within the meaning of Clause 5(1)(a) of the framework agreement.
Treba pa je povedati, da člen 2 zakonske uredbe �t. 61/2000 s tem, da podjetjem nalaga, da pristojnim organom po�ljejo kopijo vsake pogodbe o zaposlitvi za kraj�i delovni čas, ustvarja administrativno oviro, ki lahko omejuje možnosti za zaposlitev s kraj�im delovnim časom, v smislu določbe 5(1)(a) okvirnega sporazuma.
The Italian Government’s argument that the obligation to give notice is justified by the need to combat undeclared work and to keep the authorities informed of employers’ practices is unconvincing.
Trditev italijanske vlade, da je ta obveznost po�iljanja utemeljena s potrebo po boju proti delu na črno in z obve�čanjem upravnih organov o ravnanjih delodajalcev, ni prepričljiva.
If the measure at issue in the main proceedings is to be justified by such concerns, that measure must be proportionate to the object- ive to be achieved.
Da lahko te skrbi upravičijo ukrep v postopku v glavni stvari, mora biti ta ukrep sorazmeren s ciljem, ki ga zasleduje.
However, as the Advocate General stated in points 46 to 48 of his Opinion, there are other less restrictive measures to enable the Italian Government to achieve the pleaded objectives of combating fraud and undeclared work, areas in which the national authorities have at their disposal surveillance, monitoring and police resources.
Kot pa je povedal generalni pravobranilec v točkah od 46 do 48 sklepnih predlogov, so na voljo drugi manj omejujoči ukrepi, s katerimi italijanska vlada lahko doseže navedene cilje glede boja proti goljufiji in delu na črno, kar je področje, kjer imajo nacionalni organi že na voljo nadzorne, in�pekcijske in policijske naloge.
Aside from the financial burden which that administrative formality of notification directly obliges undertakings to bear, it must be observed that Article 2 of Decree-Law No 61/2000 is accompanied by a system of penalties which provides for imposition of a fine of EUR 15 in respect of each employment contract in question and in respect of each day of late notification of the contract, with no ceiling to limit the total amount of the fine.
Poleg tega, da ta administrativna formalnost po�iljanja bremeni neposredno podjetja, je treba povedati, da člen 2 zakonske uredbe �t. 61/2000 izhaja iz sistema kazni, ki določa kazen v vi�ini 15 EUR za vsako pogodbo o zaposlitvi in za vsak dan zamude pri po�iljanju te pogodbe, brez kakr�ne koli zgornje meje celotnega zneska globe.
The combination of that administrative formality and that system of penalties acts to discourage employers from making use of parttime work.
Povezava te administrativne formalnosti in tega sistema kazni prispeva k odvračanju delodajalcev od tega, da zaposlujejo s kraj�im delovnim časom.
In addition, because of the cost and the associated penalties, the obligation to notify the authorities of parttime contracts risks particularly affecting small and mediumsized undertakings which, not having the same resources as larger undertakings, may consequently be inclined to avoid that form of organisation of work, namely parttime work, which it is the aim of Directive 97/81 to promote.
Poleg tega, zaradi stro�kov in kazni, ki so s tem povezane, obveznost po�iljanja pogodb o zaposlitvi s kraj�im delovnim časom upravnim organom pomeni nevarnost zlasti za majhna in srednja podjetja, ki jih lahko odvrne od načina organiziranja zaposlitve s kraj�im delovnim časom, ki pa jo spodbuja Direktiva 97/81, saj ne razpolagajo s tak�nimi sredstvi kot velika podjetja.
Without it being necessary to rule on interpretation of the principle of equal treatment of men and women, it is accordingly appropriate to reply to the question referred by the Landesgericht Bozen that Clause 5(1)(a) of the framework agreement must be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which requires that copies of parttime employment contracts be sent to the authorities within 30 days of their signature.
Ne da bi se bilo treba izreči o razlagi načela enakega obravnavanja med mo�kimi in ženskami, je treba zato na vpra�anje Landesgericht Bozen odgovoriti, da je treba določbo 5(1)(a) okvirnega sporazuma razlagati tako, da nasprotuje nacionalni ureditvi, kot je ta v postopku v glavni stvari, ki zahteva, da se kopije pogodb o zaposlitvi s kraj�im delovnim časom po�ljejo upravnim organom v tridesetih dneh od sklenitve navedenih pogodb.
Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court.
Ker je ta postopek za stranke v postopku v glavni stvari ena od stopenj v postopku pred predložitvenim sodi�čem, leto odloči o stro�kih.
Clause 5(1)(a) of the Framework Agreement on parttime work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC annexed to Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on parttime work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC must be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which requires that copies of parttime employment contracts be sent to the authorities within 30 days of their signature.
Določbo 5(1)(a) okvirnega sporazuma o delu s krajšim delovnim časom, sklenjenim med UNICE, CEEP in ETUC, priloženega k Direktivi Sveta 97/81/ES z dne 15. decembra 1997 o okvirnem sporazumu o delu s krajšim delovnim časom, sklenjenim med UNICE, CEEP in ETUC, je treba razlagati tako, da nasprotuje nacionalni ureditvi, kot je ta v postopku v glavni stvari, ki zahteva, da se kopije pogodb o zaposlitvi s krajšim delovnim časom pošljejo upravnim organom v tridesetih dneh od sklenitve navedenih pogodb.
Case C-143/07
Zadeva C-143/07
(Agriculture — Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 — Article 11 — System of export refunds on agricultural products — Condition for the grant of the refund — Refund paid to the exporter after submission of documents forged by its contracting partner — Goods not exported — Conditions for the application of sanctions)
„Kmetijstvo – Uredba (EGS) �t. 3665/87 – Člen 11 – Sistem izvoznih nadomestil za kmetijske proizvode – Pogoj za odobritev nadomestila – Nadomestilo, izplačano izvozniku po predložitvi dokumentov, ki jih je ponaredil njegov sopogodbenik – Neizvoženo blago – Pogoji za uporabo kazni“
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 24 April 2008 . . . . . . . . . . .
Sodba Sodi�ča (četrti senat) z dne 24. aprila 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Export refunds(Commission Regulation No 3665/87, Art. 11(1))
Kmetijstvo – Skupna ureditev trgov – Izvozna nadomestila(Uredba Komisije št. 3665/87, člen 11(1))
SUMMARY — CASE C-143/07
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-143/07
In addition, it is not possible to add a new exception, based in particular on the absence of fault on the part of the exporter, to the exhaustive list contained in that provision.
Poleg tega se k taksativnemu seznamu iz navedene določbe ne more dodati nov primer izjeme, in sicer neobstoj krivdnega ravnanja izvoznika.
The fault or error of a contracting partner is an ordinary commercial risk and cannot be considered to be unforeseeable in the context of commercial transactions.
Krivda ali napaka sopogodbenika spada pod običajno poslovno tveganje in se je ne more obravnavati kot nepredvidljivo v okviru trgovskih poslov.
The exporter is fully at liberty to select his trading partners and it is up to him to take the appropriate precautions, either by including the necessary clauses in the contracts which he concludes with them or by effecting appropriate insurance.
Izvoznik je prost pri izbiri svojih sopogodbenikov in mora biti ustrezno previden tako, da ali vključi klavzule v zvezi s tem v pogodbe, ki jih sklene, ali sklene posebno zavarovanje.
Should it prove to be the case that export of the goods on which a refund was granted did not take place, it is obvious that the exporter has requested a refund in excess of that applicable, since, in the absence of actual exportation, no refund is due.
Če se namreč izkaže, da proizvod, za katerega je bilo odobreno nadomestilo, ni bil izvožen, je očitno, da je izvoznik zahteval vi�je nadomestilo od veljavnega, ker zaradi neobstoja dejanskega izvoza ni upravičen do nadomestila.
(see paras 25, 36, 37, operative part)
(Glej točke 25, 36, 37 in izrek.)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber)
SODBA SODIŠČA (četrti senat) z dne 24. aprila 2008 *
REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany), made by decision of 15 February 2007, received at the Court on 13 March 2007, in the proceedings
V zadevi C-143/07, katere predmet je predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe na podlagi člena 234 ES, ki ga je vložilo Finanzgericht Hamburg (Nemčija) z odločbo z dne 15. februarja 2007, ki je prispela na Sodi�če 13. marca 2007, v postopku
2008 — CASE C-143/07
2008 – ZADEVA C-143/07 generalna pravobranilka: V.
Advocate General: V. Trstenjak, Registrar: R. Grass, having regard to the written procedure, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
Trstenjak, sodni tajnik: R. Grass, na podlagi pisnega postopka, ob upo�tevanju stali�č, ki so jih predložili:
57) (‘Regulation No 3665/87’).
57, v nadaljevanju: Uredba �t. 3665/87).
The reference was made in the course of proceedings between AOB Reuter & Co (‘AOB Reuter’) and Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (Principal Customs Office, Hamburg-Jonas; ‘the Hauptzollamt’) concerning the application of sanctions following payment of a refund granted on the basis of documents forged by a third party. Legal framework
Predlog je bil vložen v okviru spora med družbo AOB Reuter & Co. (v nadaljevanju: AOB Reuter) in Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas (glavna carinska pisarna Hamburg Jonas, v nadaljevanju: Hauptzollamt) glede uporabe kazni zaradi izplačila nadomestila na podlagi dokumentov, ki jih je ponaredila tretja oseba. Pravni okvir
The first, second, third and fifth recitals of the preamble to Regulation No 2945/94 state:
V prvi, drugi, tretji in peti uvodni izjavi Uredbe �t. 2945/94 je določeno:
‘… the Community rules provide for the granting of export refunds on the basis of solely objective criteria, in particular concerning the quantity, nature and characteristics of the product exported as well as its geographical destination; … in the light of experience, measures to combat irregularities and notably fraud prejudicial to the Community budget should be intensified; … to that end, provision should be made for the recovery of amounts unduly paid and sanctions to encourage exporters to comply with Community rules;
„ker veljavna Skupnostna ureditev predvideva odobravanje izvoznih nadomestil samo na podlagi objektivnih meril, zlasti količine, vrste in značilnosti izvoženega proizvoda ter njegovega namembnega kraja; ker je glede na izku�nje treba poostriti ukrepe za boj proti nepravilnostim in predvsem proti prevaram, ki bi lahko �kodljivo vplivale na proračun Skupnosti; ker je treba v ta namen predvideti vračilo preveč plačanih zneskov in kazni, da bi spodbudili izvoznike k upo�tevanju Skupnostne ureditve; ker je za zagotovitev pravilnega delovanja sistema izvoznih nadomestil treba izvajati kazni ne glede na krivdo; ker pa je kljub temu primerno, da se kazni v določenih primerih ne uporabi, zlasti v primeru očitne napake, ki jo prizna pristojni organ, in da se uporabi strožje kazni v primeru naklepa;
…, where an exporter has supplied wrong information that could lead to an undue payment of the refund if the error is not discovered, whilst, where the error is discovered it is entirely proportional to sanction the exporter for an amount in proportion to the amount which he would have received unduly if the error [had] not been discovered; … in the case where the wrong information was supplied intentionally it is equally proportional to provide for a higher sanction;
2008 – ZADEVA C-143/07 ker lahko izvoznik predloži napačne podatke, na podlagi katerih se lahko neupravičeno izplača nadomestila, če se napaka ne odkrije; ker je, če se napaka odkrije, povsem običajno, da se izvozniku naloži kazen plačila sorazmernega zneska, ki bi ga neupravičeno prejel, če se napaka ne bi odkrila, in ker je, če je bil napačen podatek dan namerno, prav tako običajno, da se naloži vi�ja sankcija;
… past experience and irregularities and notably fraud recorded in this context show that this measure is necessary and appropriate, that it will act as an adequate deterrent and that it is to be uniformly applied throughout the Member States’.
[…] ker izku�nje, nepravilnosti, predvsem pa že ugotovljene prevare, kažejo na to, da so ti ukrepi potrebni, sorazmerni, dovolj odvračilni in se morajo enotno uporabljati v vseh državah članicah“.
Under Article 4(1) of Regulation No 3665/87:
V členu 4(1) Uredbe �t. 3665/87 je določeno:
Article 11 of the Regulation provides:
V členu 11 navedene uredbe je določeno: