natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
If a friendly solution is not possible or if the search for such a solution is unsuccessful, the Ombudsman either closes the case with a critical remark to the institution or body concerned or makes a draft recommendation.
Če sporazumna rešitev ni mogoča ali če iskanjetake rešitve ni uspešno, lahko varuh človekovihpravic zaključi primer s kritično pripombo zazadevno institucijo ali organ ali pa sestavi osnutekpriporočila.
makes a draft recommendation.
priporočila.
A critical remark is normally made if (i) it is no longer possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the instance of maladministration, (ii) the maladministration appears to have no general implications, and (iii) no followup action by the Ombudsman seems necessary.
Kritična pripomba se običajno sestavi, če (i) je prepozno, da bi zadevna institucija nepravilnost odpravila, (ii) se zdi, da nepravilnost nima splošnih posledic, ali (iii) se zdi, da nadaljnji ukrepi varuha človekovih pravic niso potrebni.
A critical remark is also made if the Ombudsman considers that a draft recommendation would serve no useful purpose or in cases where the institution or body concerned fails to accept a draft recommendation but the Ombudsman does not deem it appropriate to submit a special report to Parliament.
Varuh človekovih pravic sestavi kritično pripombo tudi, če meni, da osnutek priporočila ne bi bil uporaben za ta namen, ali kadar zadevna institucija ali organ ne sprejme osnutka priporočila, varuhu pa se kljub temu ne zdi primerno, da bi Parlamentu predložil posebno poročilo.
A critical remark confirms to the complainant that his or her complaint is justified and indicates to the institution or body concerned what it has done wrong, so as to help it avoid maladministration in the future.
Kritična pripomba pritožniku potrdi, da je bila pritožba upravičena, institucijam ali organom pa pokaže napake, da se lahko v prihodnje izognejo podobnim nepravilnostim.
Unjustified restriction of languages to be used in proposals
Nedopustne omejitve glede jezikov, ki se uporabljajo v predlogih
A German association wanted to participate in the Commission's call for proposals for a rehabilitation project for torture victims, which formed part of the programme entitled "European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights".
Nemško združenje je želelo sodelovati pri pozivu Komisije k oddaji predlogov za projekt rehabilitacije žrtev mučenja, ki je bil del programa z naslovom „Evropska pobuda za demokracijo in človekove pravice“. Nevladna organizacija se je obrnila na varuha človekovih pravic in trdila, da je Komisija vztrajala, da morajo vloge biti predložene v angleščini, francoščini ali španščini.
It argued that the Commission had a legal obligation to accept the use of any of the official EU languages in applications submitted in response to its calls for proposals.
Nevladna organizacija je trdila, da je Komisija pravno zavezana sprejeti vloge v vseh uradnih jezikih EU, ki so oddane kot odgovor na poziv za oddajo predlogov.
The Commission stated that a restricted use of language had been chosen for pragmatic reasons.
Komisija je izjavila, da je bilo omejeno število jezikov izbrano iz pragmatičnih razlogov.
The Ombudsman closed the case with a critical remark, concluding that the Commission's insistence that English, French or Spanish be used for project applications constituted an instance of maladministration.259/2005/(PB)GG 
Varuh človekovih pravic je primer zaključil s kritično pripombo in sklenil, da je vztrajanje Komisije pri uporabi angleščine, francoščine ali španščine pri vlogah za projekt primer nepravilnosti.259/2005/(PB)GG 
Questionable eligibility of staff costs in agricultural project
Vprašljiva upravičenost stroškov za osebje pri kmetijskem projektu
A German university, which participated in a project co-financed by the Community, turned to the Ombudsman, arguing that the Commission should have claimed back advance payments made to a Spanish university which was originally in charge of co-ordi-nating the project.
Nemška univerza, ki je sodelovala pri projektu, ki ga je sofinancirala Skupnost, se je obrnila na varuha človekovih pravic in trdila, da bi Komisija morala zahtevati vrnitev predplačila, ki je bilo izplačano španski univerzi, prvotno odgovorni za usklajevanje projekta.
The Ombudsman's inquiry revealed that there were reasonable doubts as regards staff costs amounting to Eur 38 000, which should have induced the Commission to carry out further checks.
Preiskava varuha človekovih pravic je pokazala, da obstaja utemeljen dvom o stroških za osebje v višini 38 000 eur, kar bi moralo Komisijo spodbuditi k nadaljnjemu preverjanju.
As the Commission refused to do so, the Ombudsman closed the case with a critical remark, stating that the institution had failed to examine, in a sufficiently thorough and proper manner, the complainant's strong arguments concerning the staff costs which had been accepted.576/2005/GG 
Ko je Komisija to zavrnila, je varuh človekovih pravic primer zaključil s kritično pripombo in navedel, da institucija ni dovolj podrobno in primerno preučila tehtnih argumentov pritožnika v zvezi s sprejetimi stroški za osebje.576/2005/GG 
Alleged systematic exclusion from tenders for electronic publications
Domnevno sistematično izključevanje z javnih razpisov za elektronske publikacije
A Dutch company developed navigation and retrieval software for electronic publications of the EU.
Nizozemsko podjetje je razvilo programsko opremo za krmarjenje in priklic za elektronske publikacije EU.
It complained to the Ombudsman that, after a change of the officials responsible for the matter within the Office for Official Publications, its products were systematically excluded from being selected in tender procedures.
Varuhu človekovih pravic se je pritožilo, da so se po zamenjavi uradnikov, odgovornih za to zadevo v Uradu za uradne publikacije, njegovi izdelki sistematično izključevali pri izbiri v izbirnih postopkih.
The company referred to four cases which the Ombudsman investigated.
Podjetje je opozorilo na štiri primere, in varuh človekovih pravic jih je raziskal.
He concluded that the Publications Office had failed to carry out a proper review of the first contract.
Ugotovil je, da Urad za uradne publikacije ni pravilno preučil prve pogodbe.
He also criticised it for having excluded the possibility of extending the second contract on the basis of reasons that were clearly unfounded and erroneous.
Varuh je Urad grajal tudi zaradi izključitve možnosti podaljšanja druge pogodbe na podlagi razlogov, ki so bili jasno neutemeljeni in napačni.
However, the Ombudsman concluded that there was no evidence that the Publications Office had systematically excluded the complainant's product from tender procedures.1128/2004/GG 
Varuh človekovih pravic je kljub temu sklenil, da ni nobenih dokazov za to, da bi Urad za uradne publikacije sistematično izključeval pritožnikov izdelek pri razpisnih postopkih.1128/2004/GG 
Public access to allowances paid to Members of the European Parliament
Dostop javnosti do nadomestil, plačanih poslancem Evropskega parlamenta
In 2005, Parliament rejected a journalist's request for information about the allowances paid to the five Maltese MEPs, citing data protection reasons.
Parlament je na podlagi varovanja podatkov leta 2005 zavrnil zahtevek novinarja za podatke o nadomestilih, izplačanih petim malteškim poslancem Evropskega parlamenta.
The journalist lodged a complaint with the Ombudsman, arguing that taxpayers have a right to know how MEPs spend public money.
Novinar je vložil pritožbo pri varuhu človekovih pravic in trdil, da imajo davkoplačevalci pravico izvedeti, kako poslanci Evropskega parlamenta trošijo javni denar.
After having consulted the European Data Protection Supervisor, who agreed with the Ombudsman's position, the Ombudsman called on Parliament to disclose the requested information, in the light of the public's legal right of access to documents.
Varuh človekovih pravic je po posvetu z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, ki se je strinjal s stališčem varuha človekovih pravic, Parlament pozval, naj v skladu z zakonsko pravico do dostopa do dokumentov, ki jo ima javnost, razkrije zahtevane podatke.
Parliament maintained its refusal.
Parlament je še naprej zavračal razkritje podatkov.
It announced, however, that it would publish general
Kljub temu pa je izjavil, da bo na svoji spletni strani objavil splošne podatke o nadomestilih poslancem Evropskega parlamenta, in namignil, da bo stanje morda
Complaints and inquiries information on MEPs' allowances on its website and alluded to the possibility of re-as-sessing the situation in 2009.
Pritožbe in preiskave znova ocenil leta 2009.
The Ombudsman issued a critical remark, regretting that Parliament had not complied with the law as interpreted by the Court of First Instance.
Varuh človekovih pravic je podal kritično pripombo in obžaloval, da Parlament ni upošteval zakona, kot ga razlaga Sodišče prve stopnje.
He, however, welcomed Parliament's decision to better inform the public about MEPs' allowances via its website.3643/2005/(GK)WP 
Kljub temu pa je pozdravil odločitev Parlamenta, da bo na svoji spletni strani javnost bolje obveščal o nadomestilih poslancem Evropskega parlamenta.3643/2005/(GK)WP 
In some cases, the complainant's only claim, express or implied, is public acknowledgment that there was maladministration.
V nekaterih primerih je pritožnikova edina eksplicitna ali implicitna zahteva javno priznanje, da se je nepravilnost zgodila.
In such cases, a critical remark also provides adequate redress to the
V takih primerih je kritična pripomba za pritožnika ustrezno zadoščenje.
In some cases, the complainant's only claim, express or implied, is public acknowledgment that there was maladministration.
V nekaterih primerih je pritožnikova edinaeksplicitna ali implicitna zahteva javno priznanje,da se je nepravilnost zgodila.
Such action also shows that the institution knows what it has done wrong and can thus avoid similar maladministration in the future.It is equally with a view to improving the EU institutions' performance in the future that the Ombudsman has made increasing use of further remarks, when he identifies an opportunity to enhance the quality of the administration.
Institucija s takim dejanjem pokaže, da se zaveda napake in se tako lahko v prihodnje izogne podobnim nepravilnostim.Varuh človekovih pravic je podobno zaradi izboljšanja uspešnosti institucij EU v prihodnosti pogosteje uporabljal dodatne pripombe, kadar je opazil priložnost za izboljšanje kakovosti uprave.
The Ombudsman made further remarks in a total of 41 cases in 2008, including the following:
Varuh človekovih pravic je v letu 2008 pripravil dodatne pripombe v 41 primerih, med drugim v naslednjih:
Delayed handing of an infringement complaint
Zamuda pri obravnavanju pritožbe zaradi kršitve
The Ombudsman received a complaint from an individual about the Commission's handling of an infringement complaint concerning Spanish legislation on increases in capital taxation.
Varuh človekovih pravic je prejel pritožbo posameznika v zvezi s tem, kako je Komisija obravnavala pritožbo zaradi kršitve španske zakonodaje o večjem obdavčevanju kapitala.
He issued a critical remark concerning the Commission's failure to adequately inform the complainant, once it had decided to formally start an infringement proceeding.
Ker Komisija ni ustrezno obvestila pritožnika, ko se je odločila za začetek formalnega postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev, je varuh podal kritično pripombo.
The Ombudsman also issued a further remark, containing suggestions as to how the Commission might consider improving its procedures.3737/2006/(BM)JMA 
Varuh človekovih pravic je podal tudi dodatno pripombo, v kateri je opisal, kako bi Komisija lahko izboljšala svoje postopke.3737/2006/(BM)JMA 
It is with a view to ensuring that the institutions and bodies learn from their mistakes and that maladministration is avoided in future that the Ombudsman published on his website, in 2008, two studies of the followup undertaken by the institutions involved to all critical remarks and further remarks issued in 2006 and 2007.
Varuh človekovih pravic je za zagotovitev, da se institucije in organi iz svojih napak učijo in da v prihodnosti ne bo prišlo do nepravilnosti, v letu 2008 na svoji spletni strani objavil dve študiji o nadaljnjih ukrepih institucij, ki so v letih 2006 in 2007 prejele kritične pripombe in dodatne pripombe.
The Ombudsman identified a small number of cases in these studies, which should serve as a model for other institutions of how best to react to critical and further remarks.
Varuh človekovih pravic je v teh študijah osvetlil nekaj primerov, ki bi jih druge institucije morale uporabljati kot zgled najboljšega odziva na kritične pripombe in dodatne pripombe.
He has designated these as star cases. They are summarised below.
Te primere je označil kot nadvse uspešne primere, njihov povzetek pa je mogoče najti v nadaljevanju.
The Ombudsman envisages informing the public on an annual basis of his findings on the institutions' followup to critical and further remarks.
Varuh človekovih pravic načrtuje letno obveščanje javnosti o svojih ugotovitvah o nadaljnjih ukrepih institucij v zvezi s kritičnimi pripombami in dodatnimi pripombami.
Followup given to critical and further remarks→→→ Star cases in the Study
Nadaljnje ukrepanje pri kritičnih pripombah in dodatnih pripombah→→→ Študija nadvse uspešnih primerov v letu
Six of the followup actions examined in the Ombudsman's 2007 study warrant special mention as star cases.
Šest nadaljnjih ukrepov, ki so bili preučeni v študiji varuha človekovih pravic iz leta 2007, si zasluži, da se omenijo kot nadvse uspešni primeri.
The European Parliament took several initiatives to give better effect to the principle of equal treatment of candidates in competitions in relation to pregnancy and childbirth (3278/2004/ELB).
Evropski parlament je prevzel več pobud, da bi zagotovil boljši učinek načela enake obravnave kandidatov na natečajih v zvezi z nosečnostjo in rojstvom otrok (3278/2004/ELB).
The Commission took a number of constructive steps, including establishing a consultancy service, to ensure that scientific fellows at its Joint Research Centre receive adequate information and advice about their contractual rights and obligations and the applicable national law (272/2005/DK).
Komisija je sprejela več konstruktivnih ukrepov, med drugim je ustanovila svetovalno službo za zagotovitev, da znanstveni raziskovalci pri njenem Skupnem raziskovalnem središču prejmejo dovolj informacij in nasvetov o svojih pogodbenih pravicah in obveznostih in veljavni nacionalni zakonodaji (272/2005/DK).
The Commission also introduced new rules to fill a gap in the sickness insurance cover for ex-spouses of officials suffering from serious illnesses and agreed to publish and widely distribute a booklet explaining the new rules (368/2005/BM).
Komisija je uvedla tudi nova pravila za zapolnitev vrzeli pri zdravstvenem zavarovanju za nekdanje zakonce uradnikov, ki trpijo zaradi resnih bolezni, in se je strinjala, da bo objavila in razširila knjižico, v kateri so opisana nova pravila (368/2005/BM).
The European Central Bank responded to the Ombudsman's suggestions by amending its rules on procurement so as to specify the relative weighting which it gives to each of the criteria chosen to determine the most economically advantageous tender (1137/2005/ID).
Evropska centralna banka se je na predloge varuha človekovih pravic odzvala s spremembo pravil o javnih naročilih, tako da je opredelila relativno težo, ki jo določi vsakemu izbranemu merilu, da ugotovi, katera ponudba je ekonomsko najugodnejša (1137/2005/ID).
The European Investment Bank clar-
Evropska investicijska banka je pojasnila obveznosti, ki jih imajo njene operativne službe
The European Ombudsman — Annual Report 2008 ified the responsibilities of its operational services as regards environmental documentation, designed new procedures for Framework Loans, including the environmental monitoring performed by the Bank's services and provided numerous concrete examples of its commitment to constructive engagement with NGOs and other civil society organisations (1807/2006/MHZ).
Evropski varuh človekovih pravic — Letno poročilo 2008 v zvezi z okoljevarstveno dokumentacijo, oblikovala je nove postopke za okvirna posojila, skupaj z okoljevarstvenim spremljanjem, ki ga izvajajo službe Banke, in navedla številne konkretne primere svoje zavezanosti konstruktivnemu sodelovanju z nevladnimi organizacijami in drugimi organizacijami civilne družbe (1807/2006/MHZ).
The European Personnel Selection Office responded constructively to criticism of differences in the linguistic requirements in open competitions following the 2004 enlargement of the Union by deciding to apply a common linguistic regime to future EU11 and EU10 competitions (3114/2005/MHZ). 
Evropski urad za izbor osebja se je konstruktivno odzval na kritike glede razlik pri jezikovnih zahtevah na javnih natečajih po širitvi Unije leta 2004, tako da se je odločil uporabiti skupni jezikovni sistem za prihodnja natečaja EU11 in EU10 (3114/2005/MHZ). 
→→→ Star cases in the Study
→→→ Študija nadvse uspešnih primerov v letu
The European Parliament introduced a new model for declarations of conflict of interest that takes into consideration previous contacts with, or activities relating to, tenderers (3732/2004/GG).
Evropski parlament je uvedel nov model za izjave o navzkrižju interesov, v katerem so upoštevani predhodni stiki s ponudniki ali dejavnosti, povezane z njimi (3732/2004/GG).
The Commission took a number of constructive steps (i) to improve its communications with applicants for traineeships (2471/2005/BU); and (ii) to ensure that its external Delegations were fully informed of a further remark concerning the role of the Commission in ensuring that the Contracting Authorities in delegated procedures respect their obligations as regards prompt preparation and transmission of contract award notices (3706/2005/MHZ).
Komisija je sprejela več konstruktivnih ukrepov (i) za izboljšanje komuniciranja s kandidati za pripravništvo (2471/2005/BU) in (ii) za zagotovitev, da so njene zunanje delegacije v celoti obveščene o dodatni pripombi v zvezi z vlogo Komisije pri zagotavljanju, da naročniki v prenesenih postopkih spoštujejo svoje obveznosti glede hitre priprave in pošiljanja obvestil o dodelitvi javnih naročil (3706/2005/MHZ).
The Commission also responded to a critical remark by offering compensation to a complainant, despite the fact that it disagreed with the Ombudsman's finding of maladministration (495/2003/ELB).
Komisija se je odzvala tudi na kritično pripombo, tako da je pritožniku ponudila odškodnino, čeprav se ni strinjala z ugotovitvijo varuha človekovih pravic, da se je zgodila nepravilnost (495/2003/ELB).
Further examples of good practice include the European Investment Bank's improvements to its policies and procedures to deal with requests for access to information and complaints (994/2004/IP and 3501/2004/PB) and the European Defence Agency's decision to amend its recruitment procedures to include written evaluation forms for each candidate (2044/2005/BM). 
Med drugimi primeri dobre prakse so izboljšave politik in postopkov za obravnavo prošenj za dostop do podatkov in pritožb, ki jih je uvedla Evropska investicijska banka (994/2004/IP in 3501/2004/PB), in odločitev Evropske obrambne agencije, da bo spremenila postopke za zaposlovanje, tako da bo vključila pisne ocenjevalne obrazce za vsakega kandidata (2044/2005/BM). 
Draft recommendations
Osnutki priporočil
In cases where it is possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the instance of maladministration, or in cases where the maladministration is particularly serious, or has general implications, the Ombudsman normally makes a draft recommendation to the institution or body concerned.
V primerih, v katerih je mogoče, da zadevna institucija nepravilnost odpravi, ali v primerih, v katerih so nepravilnosti posebno resne oziroma imajo splošne posledice, varuh človekovih pravic po navadi sestavi osnutek priporočila za to institucijo ali organ.
In accordance with Article 3(6) of the Statute of the Ombudsman, the institution or body must send a detailed opinion within three months.
V skladu s členom 3(6) Statuta varuha človekovih pravic mora institucija ali organ poslati podrobno mnenje v treh mesecih.
During 2008, 23 draft recommendations were issued.
Med letom 2008 je bilo sestavljenih 23 osnutkov priporočil.
In addition, four draft recommendations from 2007 led to decisions in 2008, while two further cases were closed, following draft recommendations made in 2004 and 2006.
Poleg tega so štirje osnutki priporočil iz leta 2007 privedli do odločb v letu 2008, dva nadaljnja primera pa sta bila zaključena po osnutkih priporočil, sestavljenih v letih 2004 in 2006.
Eight cases were closed during the year when a draft recommendation was accepted by the institution (see illustrative example below).
Osem primerov je bilo zaključenih med letom, ko so institucije sprejele osnutek priporočila (glej ponazoritev v nadaljevanju).
Ten cases were closed with critical remarks.
Deset primerov je bilo zaključenih s kritično pripombo.
At the end of 2008, 12 draft recommendations were still under consideration, including two made in 2007 and ten made in 2008.
Ob koncu leta 2008 se je še vedno obravnavalo 12 osnutkov priporočil, dva iz leta 2007 in deset iz leta 2008.
A lawyer lodged a complaint against the Commission concerning two decisions of the Board of Governors of the European Schools to increase school fees in the School in Luxembourg.
Odvetnik je vložil pritožbo zoper Komisijo glede dveh odločitev, ki ju je sprejel svet guvernerjev Evropskih šol, da se povišajo šolnine v Evropski šoli v Luxembourgu.
He alleged that there was a denial of justice by the Board of Governors because the Parents' Associations were denied the right to appeal to the Complaints Board against decisions of the Board of Governors concerning school fees.
Trdil je, da je svet guvernerjev združenju staršev odrekel pravico do pritožbe zoper odločitve sveta guvernerjev glede šolnin.
The Ombudsman's inquiry led him to call on the Commission to support, in the context of its role on the Board of Governors, the view that the jurisdiction of the Complaints Board covers appeals against acts of the Board of Governors, such as the one in question.
Preiskava je varuha človekovih pravic privedla do tega, da je Komisijo zaprosil, naj na podlagi svoje vloge v svetu guvernerjev podpre stališče, da pristojnost odbora za pritožbe vključuje pritožbe zoper ravnanje sveta guvernerjev, kot so pritožbe zoper obravnavano ravnanje.
The Commission replied that it intended to ask the Secretary-General, in one of the next meetings of the Board of Governors, for the introduction of an amendment to the General Rules of the Schools to allow such appeals.2153/2004/MF 
Komisija je odgovorila, da namerava na enem od naslednjih sestankov sveta guvernerjev generalnega sekretarja zaprositi za uvedbo spremembe splošnih pravil šol, tako da bodo take pritožbe omogočene.2153/2004/MF 
If a Community institution or body fails to respond satisfactorily to a draft recommendation, the Ombudsman may send a special report to the European Parliament.
Če institucija ali organ Skupnosti na osnutek priporočila ne da zadovoljivega odgovora, lahko varuh človekovih pravic pošlje posebno poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu.
The special report may include
Posebno poročilo lahko
If a Community institution or body fails to respond satisfactorily to a draft recommendation, the Ombudsman may send a special report to the European Parliament.
Če institucija ali organ Skupnosti na osnutekpriporočila ne da zadovoljivega odgovora, lahkovaruh človekovih pravic pošlje posebno poročilo Evropskemu parlamentu.
recommendations.As was pointed out in the European Ombudsman's Annual Report 1998, the possibility to present a special report to the European Parliament is of inestimable value for the Ombudsman's work.
vključuje priporočila.Kot je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic poudaril v letnem poročilu za leto 1998, je možnost predstavitve posebnega poročila Evropskemu parlamentu neprecenljiva za njegovo delo.