natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In every case, the first name, the surname and the professional qualifications of the doctor in charge of medical administration must be indicated.
Za izdajo soglasja mora zbornica ali poklicno združenje preveriti, ali se spo�tujejo določbe iz člena 1 in ali so estetske značilnosti table, oglasa ali znaka iz člena 4 v skladu z določbami, ki so predpisane s posebno uredbo ministra za zdravje na podlagi mnenja Vi�jega sveta za zdravje in po potrebi zbornice ali poklicnega združenja, ki izrazi svoje mnenje v roku devetdesetih dni od datuma vložitve pro�nje.
Where the advertisement contains false information on the activities in which the establishment in question is authorised to engage or the services it is authorised to provide or contains no mention of the health care director, the administrative authorisation to engage in medical practice shall be suspended for a period of between six months and one year.
Če oglas vsebuje napačne navedbe o dejavnostih ali storitvah, za katere je ustanova usposobljena, da jih opravlja, in ni naveden zdravstveni direktor, se upravno dovoljenje v zvezi z opravljanjem zdravstvene dejavnosti odvzame za obdobje od �estih mesecev do enega leta.
The advertising referred to in Article 4 shall be authorised by the region, after seeking the opinion of the regional federations of the professional associations or organisations, where so established, which must ensure that the practitioners in question possess valid scientific and other academic qualifications, and the notice, sign or advertisement, complies with the aesthetic format laid down in Article 2(3).
Ogla�evanje iz člena 4 se dovoli za pokrajino na podlagi mnenja pokrajinskih zvez zbornic ali poklicnih združenj – če obstajajo –, ki morajo zagotavljati imetni�tvo in veljavnost akademskih in znanstvenih nazivov ter skladnost estetskih značilnosti table, znaka ali oglasa z značilnostmi, določenimi z uredbo iz člena 2(3).
Those engaged in the medical professions referred to in Article 1 and the health care establishments referred to in Article 4 may engage in advertising in the forms permitted under this law, incurring expenditure thereon only to an extent equivalent to 5% of income declared for the preceding year.’
Osebe, ki opravljajo zdravstvene poklice iz člena 1, ter zdravstvene ustanove iz člena 4 lahko ogla�ujejo v obliki, ki je dovoljena s tem zakonom in v mejah izdatkov, enakim 5 % dohodkov, izkazanih v prej�njem letu.“
The advertisements covered by this provision must indicate the conditions of the regional authorisation.
V oglasih iz tega člena morajo biti navedeni podatki, omenjeni v pokrajinskem dovoljenju.
The proprietors and health care directors responsible for the establishments referred to in Article 4 who place advertisements in the forms permitted, but without regional authorisation, shall be subject to the disciplinary penalties of a reprimand or suspension from medical practice …
Imetnikom nazivov in odgovornemu zdravstvenemu vodstvu ustanov iz člena 4, ki bi ogla�evali v priznanih oblikah brez pokrajinskega dovoljenja, se lahko naloži disciplinsko sankcijo ukora ali prepoved opravljanja zdravstvenega poklica […]
Article 2 of that law is worded as follows:
Člen 2 tega zakona določa:
The provisions relating to practitioners operating within the national public health service or by virtue of a contractual relationship with that service and any maximum charges fixed in advance as a general rule in the interests of consumer protection shall not be affected by this provision …’
To ne vpliva na določbe v zvezi z opravljanjem poklicev v okviru nacionalne službe za javno zdravje ali v okviru pogodbenega razmerja s to službo ter na določbe v zvezi z morebitnimi najvi�jimi tarifami, ki se bile na splo�no predhodno uvedene zaradi varstva uporabnikov […]“
II — The facts
II – Dejansko stanje
In accordance with the Community principle of free competition, freedom of movement of persons and freedom to provide services and in order to guarantee consumers a proper choice in exercising their rights and the ability to compare services offered on the market, upon the date of entry into force of this decree shall be abolished the laws and regulations which impose, with regard to the professions and those engaged in intellectual work:
V skladu s skupnostnim načelom svobodne konkurence ter načelom prostega pretoka oseb in storitev in z namenom uporabnikom zagotoviti možnost dejanske izbire pri izvr�evanju njihovih pravic in možnost primerjave storitev, ponujenih na trgu, so od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe razveljavljeni zakoni in drugi predpisi, ki v zvezi s samostojnimi poklici in intelektualnimi dejavnostmi določajo:
Dermoestética started its business in 2003 in Italy, where it has 24 beauty centres and 21 medical centres, located in 23 cities.
Leta 2003 je družba Dermoestética začela opravljati svojo dejavnost v Italiji, kjer je odprla 24 lepotilnih centrov in 21 zdrav -stvenih centrov v 23 mestih.
(b) a prohibition, even a partial one, on placing advertisements providing information relating to professional qualifications and specialisations, the features of the services provided as well as the price and overall costs of the services, in accordance with the principles of transparency and accuracy in advertising, the observance of which shall be guaranteed by the relevant professional association;
b) prepoved, tudi delno, predvajanja informativnega oglasa o diplomah in poklicnih specializacijah, o značilnostih ponujene storitve ter cenah in splo�nih stro�kih storitev v skladu z načeli preglednosti in resničnosti sporočila, spo�tovanje katerih zagotavlja združenje;
On 10 October 2005, Dermoestética entered into an agreement with Advertising Media under which the latter was to arrange for five television advertisements to be broad-
Družba Dermoestética je 10. oktobra 2005 z družbo Advertising Media sklenila pogodbo, na podlagi katere bi morala slednja narediti pet reklamnih oglasov med
12 — ‘Dermoestética’.13 — ‘Advertising Media’.
12 – V nadaljevanju: družba Dermoestética.13 – V nadaljevanju: družba Advertising Media.
III — The questions referred to the Court cast in prime time during the programme ‘Verissimo’ on Canale 5, a national Italian station.
III – Vprašanja za predhodno odločanje televizijsko oddajo Verissimo, ki jo predvajajo v času visoke gledanosti na postaji italijanske nacionalne televizije Canale 5.
The agreed price was EUR 46 000, before tax, plus agency fees of EUR 4 000.
Dogovorjena cena je bila 46.000 EUR brez davka ter 4000 EUR za provizijo agencije.
It was in those circumstances that the Giudice di Pace di Genova decided to stay proceedings and refer the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling:
V tem okviru je predložitveno sodi�če prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo ta vpra�anja:
After taking receipt of a payment on account of EUR 2 000, Advertising Media informed Dermoestética that, in view of the applicable Italian legislation, it would not be possible to broadcast the advertisements proposed in the contract on the national television network.
Potem ko je dobila predplačilo v vi�ini 2000 EUR, je družba Advertising Media obvestila družbo Dermoestética, da ji je glede na veljavno zakonodajo v Italiji onemogočeno narediti reklamne oglase, predvidene v pogodbi, na postaji nacionalne televizije.
It proposed finding advertising slots on local television stations, subject to an increase in the agreed price.
Predlagala je, da bi ob povi�anju dogovorjene cene poiskala ogla�evalski prostor na italijanskih lokalnih televizijskih postajah.
Dermoestética asked for its payment on account of EUR 2 000 to be refunded.
Družba Dermoestética je zahtevala povračilo predplačila 2000 EUR.
When Advertising Media refused to do so, it brought an action against it before the Giudice di Pace di Genova (Italy) for payment of that sum.
Potem ko je družba Advertising Media zavrnila ta zahtevek, je vložila tožbo pri Giudice di pace di Genova (Italija) za plačilo tega zneska.
(2) Is it incompatible with Article 43 EC for national legislation, such as that under Articles 4, 5 and 9a of [the 1992 Law] and Ministerial Decree No 657/1994, and/or administrative practices to prohibit the broadcasting on national television networks of advertisements for medical and surgical treatments carried out in private health care establishments duly authorised for that purpose, even though that same advertising is permitted on local television networks, and, at the same time, to require in relation to the broadcasting of those advertisements,
Ali so s členom 43 Pogodbe ES združljive nacionalne določbe, kot so členi 4, 5 in 9a [zakona iz leta 1992] in ministrski dekret �t. 657/1994 in/ali upravna praksa, ki na nacionalni televiziji prepovedujejo ogla�evanje zdravljenja in kirur�kih posegov, ki jih opravljajo v zasebnih zdravstvenih ustanovah, ki imajo za to dovoljenje, čeprav je tako ogla�evanje dovoljeno na postajah lokalne televizije, in ki določajo, da je za navedeno ogla�evanje hkrati potrebno predhodno dovoljenje za predvajanje vsake občine in mnenje pokra-
Before that court, Cliniche Futura Srl, a subsidiary of Dermoestética established in Genoa, at whose premises the contract at issue had been signed, applied for leave to intervene, arguing that the Italian legislation on television advertising for medical activities was contrary to the freedom of establishment enshrined in Article 43 EC.
Pred tem sodi�čem je Cliniche Futura Srl, odvisna družba družbe Dermoestética s sedežem v Genovi, v katere poslovnih prostorih je bila sklenjena sporna pogodba in ki je vložila predlog za intervencijo v postopku, trdila, da je italijanska zakonodaja v zvezi s televizijskim ogla�evanjem za zdravstvene dejavnosti v nasprotju s svobodo ustanavljanja iz člena 43 ES.
(5) In any event, is the interpretative practice adopted by FNOMCEO incompatible with Articles 3(1)(g) EC, 4 EC, 98 EC, 10 EC, 81 EC and, possibly, Article 86 EC, in so far as the practice is permitted by a national law which requires the competent provincial professional associations to verify that advertisements by medical practitioners are transparent and accurate without indicating the criteria and procedures to be applied in exercising that authority?’
Ali je v vsakem primeru razlagalna praksa, ki jo je sprejela FNOMCEO, v nasprotju s členi 3(1)(g) ES, 4 ES, 98 ES, 10 ES, 81 ES in morebiti 86 ES, če tako prakso dovoljuje nacionalno pravo, ki od pristojnih pokrajinskih zbornic zahteva, da preverijo preglednost in resničnost oglasov, ne da bi bila navedena merila in podrobna pravila za izvajanje takega pooblastila?“
(3) Is it contrary to Articles 43 EC and/or 49 EC for the broadcasting of advertisements providing information on medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature in private health care establishments, duly authorised for that purpose, to be made subject to additional prior authorisation by the local authorities and/or professional associations?
Ali člena 43 in/ali 49 Pogodbe ES nasprotujeta temu, da se za predvajanje informativnega oglasa o estetskih zdravstvenih in kirur�kih storitvah, ki jih opravljajo v zasebnih zdravstvenih ustanovah, ki imajo za to dovoljenje, zahteva dodatno predhodno dovoljenje lokalnih upravnih organov in/ali zbornic?
A — The purpose of the questions referred to the Court and their admissibility
A – Predmet vprašanj za predhodno odločanje in njihova dopustnost
(4) By adopting a code of conduct which imposes limits on the advertising of professional health care services and by construing the legislation in force concerning the advertising of medical services in a manner which considerably restricts the right of doctors to advertise their own activities, both measures being binding on all doctors, have the Federazione Nazionale degli Ordini dei Medici (National Federation of Associ -ations of Doctors, Surgeons and Dentists) (‘FNOMCEO’) and the associations of group practices restricted competition beyond what is permitted under the relevant national legislation and in breach of Article 81(1) EC?
Ali so Federazione nazionale degli ordini dei medici (FNOMCEO) (Nacionalna zveza zdravni�kih zbornic, v nadaljevanju: FNOMCEO) in z njo povezane zdravni�ke zbornice, s tem da so sprejele etični kodeks, ki določa omejitve pri ogla�evanju zdravstvenih poklicev, in razlagalno prakso veljavnih določb o ogla�evanju zdravstvenih storitev, tako da omejujejo pravico zdravnikov do ogla�evanja njihovih dejavnosti – oboje pa je zavezujoče za vse zdravnike –, omejile konkurenco, tako da so presegle to, kar je dovoljeno na podlagi upo�tevnega nacionalnega prava in je v nasprotju s členom 81(1) ES?
The questions referred by the Giudice di Pace di Genova may be divided into two groups.
Vpra�anja, ki jih je zastavilo predložitveno sodi�če, se lahko razvrstijo v dve skupini.
The first group is composed of the first, second and third questions.
Prvo skupino sestavljajo prvo, drugo in tretje vpra�anje.
By those three questions, the national court is seeking to ascertain whether the 1992 Law is compatible with Articles 43 EC and 49 EC in so far as it prohibits the broadcasting of advertisements for medical and surgical treatments of a cosmetic nature on national television networks.
S temi tremi vpra�anji predložitveno sodi�če prosi za presojo združljivosti zakona iz leta 1992, ki prepoveduje ogla�evanje zdravljenja in kirur�kih posegov na področju lepotnih posegov na postajah nacionalne televizije, s členoma 43 ES in 49 ES.
CORPORACIÓN DERMOESTÉTICA other hand, it has doubts as to whether the second group is admissible.
CORPORACIÓN DERMOESTÉTICA četrtega in petega glede dopustnosti vpra�anja.
The second group of questions covers the fourth and fifth questions.
Druga skupina vpra�anj zajema četrto in peto vpra�anje.
Those two questions concern a code of conduct adopted by FNOMCEO and the practice adopted by that federation in applying the code.
Ti vpra�anji se nana�ata na etični kodeks in prakso na podlagi tega kodeksa, ki ju je sprejela FNOMCEO.
Their purpose is to ascertain whether the code and the practice are compatible with a number of provisions of the Treaty, in particular Article 81 EC, which prohibits agreements between undertakings which are incompatible with the common market.
Predmet teh dveh vpra�anj je presoja združljivosti tega kodeksa in te prakse z več določbami Pogodbe, zlasti s členom 81 ES, ki prepoveduje sporazume med podjetji, ki so v nasprotju s skupnim trgom.
The Italian Government argues that all of the questions are inadmissible, on the ground that the national court did not take account of the fact that Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, 14 repealed the laws and regulations prohibiting the professions and those engaged in intellectual work from providing information by way of advertising.
Italijanska vlada trdi, da so vsa vpra�anja nedopustna, ker predložitveno sodi�če ni upo�tevalo, da je uredba-zakon �t. 223 z dne 4. julija 2006 14razveljavila določbe zakonov in drugih predpisov, ki samostojnim in intelektualnim poklicem prepovedujejo informativno ogla�evanje.
By way of preliminary remark, it must be recalled that, according to settled caselaw, in proceedings for a preliminary ruling, it is solely for the national court before which the dispute has been brought, and which must assume responsibility for the subsequent judicial decision, to determine in the light of the particular circumstances of the case both the need for a preliminary ruling in order to enable it to deliver judgment and the relevance of the questions which it submits to the Court.
Uvodoma je treba opozoriti, da mora v skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso v okviru postopka za sprejetje predhodne odločbe le nacionalno sodi�če, ki odloča o sporu in ki mora prevzeti odgovornost za sodno odločitev, ob upo�tevanju posebnosti zadeve presoditi tako nujnost sprejetja predhodne odločbe za izdajo njegove sodbe kot tudi pomembnost vpra�anj, ki jih je predložilo Sodi�ču.
Consequently, where the questions submitted concern the interpretation of Community law, the Court of Justice is, in principle, bound to give a ruling. 15
Zato je Sodi�če načeloma dolžno odločati, kadar se predložena vpra�anja nana�ajo na razlago prava Skupnosti. 15
It also contends that the third to fifth questions are not relevant to the resolution of the main proceedings because the non-performance of the contract between Dermoestética and Advertising Media is due to the position adopted by the latter and not to a refusal on the part of the Canale 5 television company.
Trdi tudi, da tretje, četrto in peto vpra�anje ni upo�tevno za re�itev spora v postopku v glavni stvari, ker neizpolnitev pogodbe, sklenjene med družbo Dermoestética in Advertising Media, izvira iz stali�ča slednje in ne iz zavrnitve televizijske družbe Canale 5.
It is only where it is quite obvious that the interpretation of a provision of Community law that is sought by the national court bears no relation to the actual facts of the main action or its purpose or where the Court does not have before it the factual or legal material necessary to give a useful answer to the questions submitted to it that those questions may be declared inadmissible. 16
Samo če je očitno, da razlaga predpisa Skupnosti, za katero prosi nacionalno sodi�če, nima nikakr�ne zveze z dejanskim stanjem ali predmetom spora o glavni stvari ali če Sodi�če nima na voljo potrebnih dejanskih in pravnih podatkov, da bi lahko koristno odgovorilo na zastavljena vpra�anja, se lahko vpra�anja razglasi za nedopustna. 16
The Commission considers that the first group of questions is admissible.
Komisija meni, da je prva skupina vpra�anj dopustna.
15 — See, in particular, Case C-318/00 Bacardi-Martini and Cellier des Dauphins [2003] ECR I-905, paragraph 41 and the caselaw cited.
15 – Glej zlasti sodbo z dne 21. januarja 2003 v zadevi Bacardi-Martini in Cellier des Dauphins (C-318/00, Recueil, str. I-905, točka 41, in navedena sodna praksa).
16 — Ibidem (paragraph 43 and the caselaw cited therein).
16 – Ibidem (točka 42 in navedena sodna praksa).
In addition, the question whether the contested provisions of the 1992 Law are compatible with Articles 43 EC and 49 EC is not manifestly irrelevant to the outcome of the dispute in the main proceedings.
Poleg tega vpra�anje združljivosti spornih določb zakona iz leta 1992 s členoma 43 ES in 49 ES ni očitno neupo�tevno za re�itev spora v postopku v glavni stvari.
In addition, in the procedure laid down in Article 234 EC providing for cooperation between the national courts and the Court of Justice, the functions of the Court of Justice and the national courts are clearly separate and the latter has exclusive jurisdiction to interpret its national legislation. 17
Poleg tega so v okviru postopka sodelovanja med sodi�či, določenega v členu 234 ES, naloge Sodi�ča in naloge predložitvenega sodi�ča jasno ločene in izključno slednjemu pripada naloga razlage nacionalne zakonodaje. 17
If those articles, or one of them, must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude provisions, such as those introduced by the 1992 Law, which prohibit television advertising, the national court must set aside such provisions, in accordance with the caselaw on the primacy of rules of Community law which are directly applicable. 19
Namreč, če bi bilo treba ta člena ali enega izmed njiju razlagati v tem smislu, da nasprotujeta določbam, ki predvidevajo prepoved televizijskega ogla�evanja, kot je bila prepoved, uvedena z zakonom iz leta 1992, nacionalno sodi�če v skladu s sodno prakso o učinku primarnosti neposredno uporabljivega pravila prava Skupnosti ne bi smelo uporabiti teh določb. 19
In the light of those considerations, the first group of questions is indeed admissible.
Glede na to razmi�ljanje se zdi, da je prva skupina vpra�anj dopustna.
It is for the referring court to assess the effects of Decree-Law No 223 on the resolution of the main proceedings and not the government of the Member State from which the reference is made.
Predložitveno sodi�če je namreč tisto, ki mora presoditi učinke uredbe-zakona �t. 223/2006 na re�itev spora v postopku v glavni stvari, in ne vlada države članice, ki ji pripada to sodi�če.
18In referring these questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling, the Giudice di Pace di Genova considered that Decree-law No 223, Article 12 of which it sets out, did not prevent the application of the 1992 Law to the case before it.
18Giudice di pace di Genova je s predložitvijo tega predloga za sprejetje predhodne odločbe Sodi�ču v odločanje izrazilo stali�če, da ta uredba-zakon, katere člen 12 sicer navaja, ne postavlja pod vpra�aj uporabe zakona iz leta 1992 v sporu, o katerem odloča. Ni naloga Sodi�ča, da dvomi o tej presoji.
On the other hand, I share the Commission’s doubts as to the admissibility of the second group of questions.
Nasprotno pa se strinjam z dvomi Komisije v zvezi z dopustnostjo druge skupine vpra�anj.
The Italian Government’s argument that Decree-law No 223 repealed the provisions of the 1992 Law prohibiting advertising, as it did all laws and regulations prohibiting the professions and those engaged in intellectual work from providing information by way of advertising, cannot therefore be accepted and deprive the first group of questions of their purpose.
Argumenta italijanske vlade, da navedena uredba-zakon razveljavlja določbe zakona iz leta 1992, ki prepovedujejo ogla�evanje, ter vse zakone in druge predpise, ki svobodnim in intelektualnim poklicem prepovedujejo informativno ogla�evanje, torej ni mogoče sprejeti in zaradi njega prva skupina vpra�anj torej ni brezpredmetna.
The purpose of that group of questions is to ascertain whether a code of conduct adopted by a federation of doctors and that federation’s practice in applying the code are compatible with Community law.
Ta skupina vpra�anj ima dejansko za predmet presojo združljivosti etičnega kodeksa in prakse na podlagi tega kodeksa, ki ju je sprejela zveza zdravnikov, s pravom Skupnosti.
However, the Giudice di Pace di Genova has not provided any details as to the content of that code or that practice.
Vendar predložitveno sodi�če ni posredovalo nobenih podatkov o vsebini tega kodeksa in te prakse.
Nor did it explain how the Court’s examination of that code and that practice would be relevant to the outcome of the main proceedings.
Tudi ni obrazložilo, kako naj bi bila preučitev tega kodeksa in navedene prakse s strani Sodi�ča upo�tevna za re�itev spora v postopku v glavni stvari.
17 — See, in particular, Case C-295/97 Piaggio [1999] ECR I-3735, paragraph 29 and the caselaw cited.
17 – Glej zlasti sodbo z dne 17. junija 1999 v zadevi Piaggio (C-295/97, Recueil, str. I-3735, točka 29, in navedena sodna praksa).
18 — Case C-153/02 Neri [2003] ECR I-13555, paragraph 35.
18 – Sodba z dne 13. novembra 2003 v zadevi Neri (C-153/02, Recueil, str. I-13555, točka 35).
19 — Case 106/77 Simmenthal [1978] ECR 629, paragraph 21.
19 – Sodba z dne 9. marca 1978 v zadevi Simmenthal (106/77, Recueil, str.
Since rules on television advertising for medical treatments have been harmonised in Directive 89/552, it is necessary to consider whether the compatibility of the provisions of the 1992 Law at issue must be examined in the light of that directive or the provisions of the Treaty on freedom of movement.
V delu, v katerem je bilo televizijsko ogla�evanje zdravstvenih storitev predmet usklajevanja v Direktivi 89/552, je treba preučiti, ali je treba združljivost spornih določb zakona iz leta 1992 presojati z vidika te direktive ali z vidika določb Pogodbe v zvezi s prostim pretokom.