natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To the extent that conclusion of the supply contract with the pharmacy of another hospital or with an external pharmacy is subject to the contested provisions, which lay down conditions analogous to those applicable in the system of internal provision of supplies, namely the requirement that there be one pharmacist who is, firstly, responsible for the supply of medicinal products and, secondly, generally and quickly available in situ, it follows that those provisions ensure that all the elements of the
Če je sklenitev pogodbe o oskrbi z lekarno druge bolni�nice ali zunanjo lekarno odvisna od spornih določb, ki določajo pogoje, analogne tistim, ki veljajo v okviru sistema z interno oskrbo, torej zahtevo, da je lekarnar po eni strani odgovoren za oskrbo z zdravili in po drugi strani zadostno in hitro na voljo na kraju samem, je treba ugotoviti, da te določbe zagotavljajo enakovrednost in združljivost med vsemi
2008 — CASE C-141/07 system for the supply of medicinal products to hospitals in Germany are equivalent and mutually compatible, and thereby guarantee the unity and balance of that system.
2008 – ZADEVA C-141/07 elementi sistema oskrbe bolni�nic z zdravili v Nemčiji in tako zagotavljajo enotnost in ravnovesje tega sistema.
Accordingly, the contested provisions can be seen to be necessary to the achievement of the objective of ensuring a high level of public health protection and clearly do not go beyond what is necessary.
Zato so sporne določbe nujne za uresničitev cilja o zagotovitvi vi�je ravni varovanja javnega zdravja in ne presegajo okvirov tak�ne nujnosti.
On the other hand, the approach upheld by the Commission, in that it permits the services linked to the system of external provision of supplies to be entrusted to contracting pharmacists whose dispensary is not situated in the vicinity of the hospital to be supplied, is likely to undermine the unity and balance of the system for the supply of medicinal products to hospitals in Germany and, consequently, the high level of public health protection which the Federal Republic of Germany seeks to achieve.
Pristop, ki ga zagovarja Komisija in ki omogoča, da se storitve, povezane s sistemom z zunanjo oskrbo, zaupajo lekarnam pogodbenicam, katerih podružnica je v bližini oskrbovane bolni�nice, bi nasprotno lahko �kodil enotnosti in ravnovesju sistema oskrbe bolni�nic v Nemčiji z zdravili in tako vi�ji ravni varovanja javnega zdravja, ki ga Zvezna republika Nemčija namerava doseči.
Furthermore, in practice, the approach recommended by the Commission would oblige those German hospitals which choose to obtain their supplies from external pharmacies or from pharmacies of other hospitals to employ several pharmacists in order to safeguard the various services linked to the provision of supplies, which would, as pointed out by the Advocate General in point 122 of his Opinion, generate additional costs inherent in any such employment.
Poleg tega bi prednostni pristop Komisije v praksi zavezal nem�ke bolni�nice, ki se odločijo za oskrbo s strani zunanjih lekarn ali lekarn drugih bolni�nic, da zaradi zagotovitve različnih nalog, povezanih z oskrbo, zaposlijo več lekarnarjev, kar naj bi povzročilo, kot poudarja generalni pravobranilec v točki 122 sklepnih predlogov, dodatne stro�ke, povezane s tako zaposlitvijo.
While objectives of a purely economic nature cannot justify a restriction on the fundamental principle of free movement of goods, none the less, as regards interests of an economic nature concerning the maintenance of a balanced medical and hospital service open to all, the Court has accepted that such an objective may also fall within one of the derogations, on grounds of public health, in so far as it contributes to the attainment of a high level of health protection (see by analogy, in particular,
Čeprav z izključno gospodarskimi cilji ni mogoče utemeljiti ovire temeljnemu načelu prostega pretoka blaga, pa je vendar glede gospodarskih interesov, katerih cilj je ohranitev uravnoteženih in vsem dostopnih zdravstvenih in bolni�ničnih storitev, Sodi�če v tem pogledu dopustilo, da je tak cilj lahko tudi eno od odstopanj iz razlogov javnega zdravja, če prispeva k vi�ji ravni varovanja zdravja (po analogiji glej zlasti sodbi z dne
Case C-158/96 Kohll [1998] ECR I-1931, paragraph 50, and Case C-444/05 Stamatelaki [2007] ECR I-3185, paragraph 31).
I-1931, točka 50, in z dne 19. aprila 2007 v zadevi Stamatelaki, C-444/05, ZOdl., str. I-3185, točka 31).
From those two points of view, it is equally clear that the requirement that one local pharmacist should be given responsibility for all the tasks involved in the supply of medicinal products to German hospitals is not a measure which goes beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective pursued by the Federal Republic of Germany, namely to achieve a high level of public health protection.
Ob upo�tevanju tega dvojnega vidika zahteva, da se celota nalog, ki izhajajo iz oskrbe zadevnih bolni�nic z zdravili, zaupa lekarnarju v bližini, ravno tako ni ukrep, ki presega okvire, nujne za doseganje cilja, ki ga zasleduje Zvezna republika Nemčija, torej doseči vi�jo raven varovanja javnega zdravja.
In the light of the foregoing, the contested provisions must be considered to be justified on grounds relating to the protection of public health.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je treba ugotoviti, da je treba sporne določbe obravnavnavati kot utemeljene z razlogi v povezavi z varovanjem javnega zdravja.
Under Article 69(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the unsuccessful party is to be ordered to pay the costs if they have been applied for in the successful party’s pleadings.
Na podlagi člena 69(2) Poslovnika se neuspeli stranki naloži plačilo stro�kov, če so bili ti prigla�eni.
Since the Federal Republic of Germany has applied for costs and the Commission has been unsuccessful, the Commission must be ordered to pay the costs.
Ker je Zvezna republika Nemčija predlagala, naj se Komisiji naloži plačilo stro�kov, in ker ta s predlogi ni uspela, se ji naloži plačilo stro�kov.
Case C-228/07
Zadeva C-228/07
(Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 4(1)(b) and (g), Article 10(1) and Article 69 — Freedom of movement for persons — Articles 39 EC and 42 EC — Statutory pension and accident insurance scheme — Benefit for reduced capacity to work or incapacity to work — Advance payment to unemployed persons who apply for the grant of a benefit — Whether the benefit is an ‘unemployment benefit’ or an ‘invalidity benefit’ — Residence qualification)
„Socialna varnost – Uredba (EGS) �t. 1408/71 – Členi 4(1)(b) in (g), 10(1) in 69 – Prosto gibanje oseb – Člena 39 ES in 42 ES – Zakonska ureditev pokojninskega in nezgodnega zavarovanja – Zavarovalnina zaradi zmanj�anja zmožnosti za delo ali invalidnosti – Predplačilo, plačano brezposelnim prosilcem – Opredelitev prejemka kot ‚prejemka za brezposelnost‘ ali kot ‚prejemka za invalidnost‘ – Prebivali�če kot pogoj“
Opinion of Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered on 15 May 2008 . .
Ruiz-Jaraboja Colomerja, predstavljeni 15. maja 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Social security for migrant workers — Equal treatment (Art. 39 EC; Council Regulation No 1408/71, Art. 4(1)(g))
Socialna varnost delavcev migrantov – Enako obravnavanje (člen 39 ES; Uredba Sveta št. 1408/71, člen 4(1)(g))
SUMMARY — CASE C-228/07
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-228/07
not be exhausted. Under those circumstances, notwithstanding the fact that it is linked to an application for an invalidity pension, such a benefit is directly related to the risk of unemployment referred to in Article 4(1)(g) of Regulation No 1408/71.
je treba ugotoviti, da se kljub dejstvu, da je vezan na pro�njo za invalidsko pokojnino, tak prejemek nana�a neposredno na tveganje brezposelnosti iz člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe �t. 1408/71.
A benefit such as the advance granted to unemployed persons who have applied for the grant of a benefit under the statutory pension and accident insurance scheme on the ground of reduced capacity to work or incapacity to work must be regarded as an ‘unemployment benefit’ within the meaning of Article 4(1)(g) of Regulation No 1408/71.
Prejemek, kot je predplačilo, ki se izplača brezposelnim osebam, ki so na podlagi zakonskega pokojninskega in nezgodnega zavarovanja zaprosile za dodelitev prejemka zaradi zmanj�ane zmožnosti za delo ali invalidnosti, je treba �teti za „dajatev za brezposelnost [prejemek za brezposelnost]“ v smislu člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe �t. 1408/71.
(see paras 23, 25, 29, 30, 35, 36, operative part 1)
(Glej točke 23, 25, 29, 30, 35, 36 in točko 1 izreka.)
Inasmuch as no factor has been put forward which shows that such a condition is objectively justified and proportionate, Article 39 EC must be interpreted as preventing a Member State from making the grant of a benefit such as the advance granted to unemployed persons who have applied for the grant of a benefit under the statutory pension and accident insurance scheme on the ground of reduced capacity to work or incapacity to work, which must be regarded as an ‘unemployment benefit’ within the meaning of Article 4(1)(g) of Regulation No 1408/71, subject to the condition that the recipients be resident in the national territory of that State.
Člen 39 ES je treba razlagati tako, da nasprotuje temu, da država članica za dodelitev prejemka, kot je predplačilo, ki se izplača brezposelnim osebam, ki so na podlagi zakonskega pokojninskega in nezgodnega zavarovanja zaprosile za dodelitev prejemka zaradi zmanj�ane zmožnosti za delo ali invalidnosti, ki ga je treba �teti za „dajatev za brezposelnost [prejemek za brezposelnost]“ v smislu člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe �t. 1408/71, določi pogoj, da imajo upravičenci prebivali�če na nacionalnem ozemlju te države, če ne predloži nobenega elementa, ki bi lahko dokazal, da je ta pogoj objektivno utemeljen in sorazmeren.
First, the purpose and object of the benefit in question is to provide an applicant for invalidity benefit who is unemployed or has no income, when the circumstances indicate that the pension should be granted, with the financial means to meet his needs until a definitive decision is adopted on his application and, consequently, during a period in which it is still uncertain whether the applicant can return to professional life.
Najprej, kar zadeva predmet in namen navedenega prejemka, je njegov namen zagotoviti prosilcu invalidske pokojnine, ki nima zaposlitve in ne prejema nobenega dohodka, in če okoli�čine omogočajo predvideti dodelitev te pokojnine, finančna sredstva, ki mu omogočajo zadovoljiti potrebe, dokler ni izdana dokončna odločba o njegovi pro�nji, torej v času, v katerem obstaja negotov položaj glede možnosti tega prosilca, da se vrne v poklicno življenje.
That benefit, which is also paid by the authorities competent in the matter of unemployment, is essentially to replace the remuneration lost by reason of unemployment and thereby provide for the maintenance of the unemployed person.
Ta prejemek, ki ga prav tako izplačajo organi, pristojni za področje brezposelnosti, je v bistvu namenjen nadomestitvi plače, izgubljene zaradi brezposelnosti, da se krijejo stro�ki brezposelnega delavca.
In addition, with regard to the basis on which the benefit at issue in the main proceedings is calculated, the amount thereof is determined in the same way as unemployment benefit.
Dalje, kar zadeva osnovo za izračun navedenega prejemka, se njegov znesek določi enako kot znesek za nadomestilo za brezposelnost.
Finally, with regard to the conditions for the grant of the said benefit, in addition to the fact that the provisions applicable to that benefit are laid down in the rules concerning unemployment benefit and that the benefit is paid by the authorities competent in regard to unemployment, the applicant for an invalidity pension must fulfil the conditions for entitlement to unemployment benefit in terms of length of affiliation; in addition, the period of entitlement to the benefit must
Nazadnje, kar zadeva pogoje za dodelitev tega prejemka, so določbe, ki veljajo za ta prejemek, določene v zakonodaji o zavarovanju za primer brezposelnosti, in da prejemek dodelijo organi, pristojni za področje brezposelnosti, mora prosilec za invalidsko pokojnino izpolniti pogoje za upravičenost do nadomestila za brezposelnost, ki se nana�ajo na trajanje zavarovalnega razmerja in na neobstoj prekoračitve obdobja upravičenosti do prejemka. V teh okoli�činah
Unless it is objectively justified and proportionate to the aim pursued, a provision of national law must be regarded as indirectly discriminatory if it is intrinsically liable to affect migrant workers more than national workers and if there is a consequent risk that it will place the former at a particular disadvantage. That is true of a residence condition such as the one to which the grant of
Določbo nacionalnega prava je treba, razen če je objektivno upravičena in sorazmerna z zastavljenim ciljem, namreč �teti za posredno diskriminatorno, ker lahko že samo zaradi svoje lastnosti bolj vpliva na delavce migrante
PETERSEN which they were formerly employed to return to their countries of origin.
PETERSEN težijo k temu, da zapustijo državo, v kateri so prej delali, zato da se vrnejo v svojo državo izvora.
the benefit at issue is subject, which can be more easily met by national workers than by those from other Member States, since the latter workers above all, particularly in the case of unemployment or invalidity, tend to leave the country in
Za tak primer gre pri pogoju prebivali�- ča – kot je ta, ki pogojuje dodelitev navedenega prejemka – ki ga lažje izpolnijo nacionalni delavci kot delavci iz drugih držav članic, saj zlasti slednji, predvsem v primeru brezposelnosti ali invalidnosti,
(see paras 54, 55, 64, operative part 2)
(Glej točke 54, 55, 64 in točko 2 izreka.)
OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERALRUIZ-JARABO COLOMER delivered on 15 May 2008 1
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI GENERALNEGA PRAVOBRANILCADÁMASA RUIZ-JARABOJA COLOMERJA, predstavljeni 15. maja 2008 1
However, the uncertainty lies not in the classification itself but rather in the aim pursued by Community law, which is closely linked to the creation of citizenship of the Union, a concept whose definition has been developed in the caselaw of the Court of Justice.
1971 2 dopu�ča dva mogoča odgovora, ki sta oba prepričljiva; vendar dilema ne obstaja v posebni razvrstitvi, ampak v cilju prava Skupnosti, ki je bistveno povezan z uvedbo državljanstva Unije, katerega vsebina je bila razvita v sodni praksi Sodi�ča.
At times, people invent classifications which endure only in the realm of ideas.
Človeku se zgodi, da gradi kategorije, ki obstajajo samo v svetu idej.
However, if those classifications become entrenched and appear to take on a life of their own, there is a risk of commencing arguments which lead nowhere.
Vendar če se razvrstitve zakoreninijo in se zdi, da imajo svoje življenje, se pojavi tveganje, da se bodo začele razprave, ki ne vodijo nikamor.
That outcome is particularly marked when such classifications have an essentially practical scope, as is the case with the law.
Ta izid je posebno dramatičen, če so te kategorije zelo praktične, kot to velja za področje prava.
As Prince Hamlet, the first existentialist of the modern era, guessed, the difference between being and not being is pure fantasy. 3
Kot je slutil princ Hamlet, prvi eksistencialist moderne dobe, je razlika med biti in ne biti popolna fantazija 3.
Accordingly, it is necessary to be absolutely rigorous in order to formulate a just reply in conformity with the law.
Zato je treba preseči strogost, da bi se lahko pripravil predlog, ki je pravičen in v skladu s pravom.
2 — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to selfemployed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ English Special Edition 1971 (II), p. 416).
2 – Uredba o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti (UL L 149, str. 2).
In the present proceedings, the Austrian Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Administrative Court) asks a question which, of itself, does not have a correct answer.
V tej zadevi avstrijsko Verwaltungs -gerichtshof izraža dvom, ki sam po sebi nima nobenega pravilnega odgovora.
Accordingly, the Court is required to seek the most correct reply, even though it may not be the only viable one.
Sodi�če mora torej najti najpravilnejšo re�itev, čeprav ni edina mogoča; gre za socialnovarstveno dajatev, katere opredelitev glede na Uredbo Sveta (EGS) �t.
The question concerns a social security benefit, whose classification under Council Regulation No 1408/71 of 14 June
1408/71 z dne 14. junija
3 — The view that there is no absolute truth but merely a relative truth originates from the sophists, who argued that it was impossible to perceive reality through the senses because each sense interprets the world in a different way.
3 – Misel, da ne obstaja absolutna resnica, ampak samo relativna resnica, izvira od sofistov, ki so zagovarjali nezmožnost dojemanja stvarnosti s čuti, ker vsak čut drugače razlaga svet. Ta izguba iluzije o resnici pojasnjuje dobro znani samogovor princa Hamleta, v katerem zatrjuje, da razlika med biti in ne biti izhaja iz individualne domi�ljije (Rosenberg, M., The Masks of Hamlet, Associated University Presses, London, 1992, str. od 65 do 82).
III — The legal framework
III – Pravni okvir
In the case referred by the Austrian court, a worker who has transferred his residence to another Member State, namely Germany, has had a social security benefit which he was receiving in Austria, where he pursued his working life, withdrawn.
V zadevi, ki nam jo je predložilo avstrijsko predložitveno sodi�če, je bila delavcu, ki se je za stalno preselil v drugo državo članico, v tem primeru Nemčijo, odvzeta socialnovarstvena dajatev, ki jo je prejemal v Avstriji, kjer je končal poklicno kariero.
Accordingly, the reference concerns the free movement of persons and, more specifically, the free movement of employed persons.
Zato se predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe nana�a na prosto gibanje oseb in zlasti na prosto gibanje zaposlenih delavcev.
It is appropriate to begin by setting out the relevant provisions of the EC Treaty:
Torej je treba najprej opozoriti na upo�tevne določbe Pogodbe ES:
Jörn Petersen, a citizen of the Union with German nationality, worked as an employed person in Austria, the country where he resided.
Jörn Petersen, evropski državljan nem�ke narodnosti, je bil zaposlen v Avstriji, kjer je tudi prebival.
In April 2000 he applied to the Austrian Pensionsversicherungsanstalt (Pension Insurance Institution) for an incapacity pension but that application was refused and therefore he brought an action before the courts.
Aprila 2000 je pri avstrijskem Pensionsversicherungsanstalt (organ za pokojninsko zavarovanje) vložil zahtevek za pokojnino zaradi nezmožnosti za delo, ki je bila zavrnjena, zoper to odločbo pa je nato vložil tožbo na sodi�ču.
While the judicial proceedings were taking place, the Arbeitsmarktservice (Employment Service) granted Mr Petersen advance unemployment benefit, in accordance with Paragraph 23 of the Arbeitslosenversicherungsgesetz 1977 (Law on Unemployment Insurance; ‘AlVG’).
Med sodnim postopkom je Arbeitsmarktservice (služba za zaposlovanje) J. Petersenu odobrila predplačilo dajatve za brezposelnost na podlagi člena 23 Arbeitslosenversicherungsgesetz iz leta 1977 (zakon o zavarovanju za primer brezposelnosti, v nadaljevanju: AlVG).
Through that benefit, Austrian law provides individuals who are unemployed and have applied for an incapacity pension with a guaranteed minimum income while the procedure is taking place.
Avstrijska zakonodaja s to dajatvijo omogoča zagotav -ljanje minimalnih prihodkov osebam, ki zaprosijo za invalidsko pokojnino, medtem ko so med postopkom brez zaposlitve.
However, on 28 October 2003, the authorities withdrew the benefit on the ground of his change of residence.
Vendar mu je urad 28. oktobra 2003 odvzel pomoč na podlagi spremembe stalnega prebivali�ča. J.
Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union.
Državljani Unije so vse osebe z držav -ljanstvom ene od držav članic.
Citizenship of the Union shall complement and not replace national citizenship.
Državljanstvo Unije dopolnjuje in ne nadome�ča naci -onalnega državljanstva.
Citizens of the Union shall enjoy the rights conferred by this Treaty and shall be subject to the duties imposed thereby.’ nationality between workers of the Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment.
Za državljane Unije veljajo pravice in dolžnosti po tej pogodbi.“ delavcev držav članic v zvezi z zaposlitvijo, plačilom in drugimi delovnimi in zaposlitvenimi pogoji.
It shall entail the right, subject to limitations justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health:
Ob upo�tevanju omejitev, utemeljenih z javnim redom, javno varnostjo in javnim zdravjem, zajema pravico:
(c) to stay in a Member State for the purpose of employment in accordance with the provisions governing the employment of nationals of that State laid down by law, regulation or administrative action;
(c) bivati v državi članici zaradi zaposlitve skladno z določbami zakonov in drugih predpisov, ki urejajo zaposlovanje držav -ljanov te države;
The provisions of secondary law referred to in Article 42(3)(d) are principally contained in Regulation No 1408/71, 4Art -icles 4, 10 and 69 of which have a particular bearing on the present case:
Pravila sekundarne zakonodaje, na katere se sklicuje člen 42 ES, so predvsem v Uredbi �t. 1408/71 4, zlasti v členih 4, 10 in 69 te uredbe:
The Council shall, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251, adopt such measures in the field of social security as are necessary to provide freedom of movement for workers; to this end, it shall make arrangements to secure for migrant workers and their dependants:
Svet sprejme v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 tak�ne ukrepe na področju socialne varnosti, kakr�ni so potrebni za zagotovitev prostega gibanja delavcev; v ta namen vzpostavi ureditev, ki delavcem migrantom in njihovim vzdrževancem zagotavlja:
(a) aggregation for the purpose of acquiring and retaining the right to benefit and of calculating the amount of benefit, of all periods taken into account under the laws of the several countries;
(a) se�tevanje vseh dob, ki se upo�tevajo po zakonodajah posameznih držav, za pridobitev in ohranjanje pravice do dajatev ter za izračun vi�ine dajatev;
(b) invalidity benefits, including those intended for the maintenance or improvement of earning capacity;
(b) invalidske dajatve, vključno s tistimi, ki so namenjene vzdrževanju ali izbolj�evanju možnosti pridobivanja zaslužka;
(b) payment of benefits to persons resident in the territories of Member States.
(b) izplačevanje dajatev osebam s prebivali�- čem na ozemlju držav članic.
4 — That legislative text was replaced by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).
4 – Ta uredba je bila nadome�čena z Uredbo (ES) �t. 883/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti (UL L 166, str. 1).
(e) benefits in respect of accidents at work and occupational diseases;
(e) dajatve za nesreče pri delu in poklicne bolezni;
(g) unemployment benefits;
(g) dajatve za brezposelnost;
An employed or selfemployed person who is wholly unemployed and who satisfies the conditions of the legislation of a Member State for entitlement to benefits and who goes to one or more other Member States in order to seek employment there shall retain his entitlement to such benefits under the following conditions and within the following limits:
Delavec, ki je popolnoma brezposeln in izpolnjuje pogoje zakonodaje države članice za upravičenost do dajatev in odide v eno ali več drugih držav članic, da bi si tam poiskal zaposlitev, ohrani upravičenost do takih dajatev pod naslednjimi pogoji in v skladu z naslednjimi omejitvami: