natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Suitability of complaint for awareness raising.
s Inþpektorati: n Zdravstveni inþpektorat; Parmova 33, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija, Tel: 01/28 03 802, Faks: 01/28 03 808, e-mail: gp.zirs@gov.si.
Impact on public opinion of different mechanisms.
n Inþpektorat za okolje in prostor, Dunajska cesta 47, 1000 Ljubljana, Tel: 01/420 44 88, Faks: 01/420 44 91, e-poþta: bojana.pohar@gov.si.
Possible costs and fees incurred by using a particular mechanism.
n Inþpekcija nadzora varnosti in zdravja pri delu, Parmova 33, 1000 Ljubljana, telefon: 01/280 36 60, 01/280 36 70, fax: 01/280 36 77, 01/280 36 76, e-poþta: boris.ruzic@gov.si.
A person who has been discriminated against may make a complaint, first and foremost to bring justice for himself and to obtain some form of compensation.
n Inþpektorat Republike Slovenije za delo, Parmova 33, 1000 Ljubljana, telefon: 01/280 36 60, 01/280 36 70, fax: 01/280 36 77, 01/280 36 76., e-poþta: irsd@gov.si.
This is, however, not the only reason why a person should make a complaint. Another reason is to raise awareness of discrimination.
n Prometni inþpektorat, Tr™aþka 19a, 1000 Ljubljana, Tel.: 01/ 478 80 00, Fax: 01/ 478 81 49, e-poþta: gp.mzp-pirs@gov.si.
A person who alleges that the employer has acted in a discriminatory way, may within four months of the alleged breach, lodge a complaint to the Industrial Tribunal and the Industrial Tribunal shall hear such complaint and carry out any investigations as it shall deem fit.
n Ministrstvo za javno upravo › Oddelek za upravno inþpekcijo, Tr™aþka 21, 1000 Ljubljana, Tel.: 01/ 478-83-30, Fax: 01/478-83-31, e-poþta: gp.mju@gov.si.
Also, according to Regulation 9 of Legal Notice 461 of 2004, it is stated that:
n Inþpektorat za notranje zadeve, Kersnikova 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Tel: 01/ 473-65-10, Faks:01/ 473 6 620, e-poþta: inz.mnz@gov.si.
On receipt of such notification, the respondent shall submit a writ-ten reply within 10 working days of the date of receipt of such notification, giving the respondent's version of events and any grounds for disputing the allegations, as well an explanation of any relevant procedures adopted by the respondent to prevent discriminatory treatment.
n Inþpektorat za varstvo osebnih podatkov, Tivolska 50, 1000 Ljubljana, Tel.: 01/478-52-60, Faks: 01/478-53-44, e-poþta: gp.mp@gov.si.
Any correspondence referred to in sub-regulation (1) of this regulation shall be admissible in proceedings brought before the Industrial Tribunal or other Court, and if it appears to the Tribunal or Court that the respondent deliberately, and without reasonable excuse, omitted to reply within 10 working days of the date of receipt of
n Inþpektorat za kulturo in medije, Metelkova 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Tel.: 01/478-79-01, Faks: 01/478-79-81, e-poþta: ivan.pal@gov.si.
However, the provisions laid down in the regulation mentioned above, requiring the respondent to submit a reply, shall not apply if, on the date that the request was made, proceedings had already been initiated on the matter in front of the Industrial Tribunal or other Court.
Brezplaｲna pravna pomoｲ s Pravno-informacijski center nevladnih organizacij › PIC, Povþetova 37, 1000 Ljubljana, telefon: 01/ 521 18 88, fax: 01/540 19 13, e-mail: pic@pic.si.
This section should not only indicate what procedures have to be followed but also what factual information is mandatory to be included in the submission of the complaint under national rules.
n Okro™no sodiþｲe v Ljubljani, Tavｲarjeva 9, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Tel.: 01/366 44 44, Fax: 01/366 45 18.
The National Commission for the Promotion of Equality for Men and Women drew up a Code of Practice on Sexual Harassment which is intended to disseminate information to employers, employees and the general public about the meaning of the term `sexual harassment', and the relative rights and obligations of the employers and employees.
n Okro™no sodiþｲe v Kranju, Zoisova 2, SI-4000 Kranj, Tel.: 04/271 12 00, Fax: 04/271 12 03.
In particular, it is meant to ensure that sexual harassment at the workplace is prohibited and that it is clearly understood that it can give rise to serious consequences if it does in fact subsist.
n Okro™no sodiþｲe v Novem mestu, Jerebova 2, SI-8000 Novo mesto, Tel.: 07/ 338 11 00, Fax: 07/332 20 58.
Impediments and obstacles
n Okro™no sodiþｲe na Ptuju, Krempljeva ul. 7, SI-2250 Ptuj, Tel.: 02/748 08 00, Fax: 02/748 08 10.
In Malta it may be noted that judges, the Ombudsman, and administrative review bodies lack familiarity with the directives and national anti-discrimination provisions.
n Okro™no sodiþｲe v Celju, Preþernova 22, SI-3000 Celje, Tel.: 03/427 51 00, Fax: 03/427 51 73.
Also, the court costs which a person would incur or the risk of costs where the case is lost could be seen as an obstacle for people to bring forward their case when they have been discriminated against.
n Okro™no sodiþｲe v Mariboru, Sodna ulica 14, SI-2000 Maribor, Tel.: 02/234 71 00, Fax: 02/234 73 06.
In this regard support may be given to people who have been discriminated against when being represented by NGOs.
n Okro™no sodiþｲe v Novi Gorici, Kidriｲeva 14, SI-5000 Nova Gorica, Tel.: 05/335 17 00, Fax: 05/335 16 97.
Also, they could make use of the resources which equality commissions have available to support individual complaints.
n Okro™no sodiþｲe v Kopru, Ferrarska 9, SI-6000 Koper, Tel.: 05/668 30 00 Fax: 05/639 52 47.
Where there is a disputed issue of EU law, a referral can be made by a national court to the Euro-pean Court of Justice in Luxembourg under Article 234 of the Treaty.
n Okro™no sodiþｲe v Slovenj Gradcu, Kidriｲeva 1, SI-2380 Slovenj Gradec, Tel.: 02/884 24 71, Fax: 02/884 14 59.
The parties to the proceed-
n Delovno sodiþｲe v Kopru, Ferrarska 9, SI-6000 Koper, Tel.: 05/668 32 70 Fax: 05/639 52 51.
Any court may make a referral, but only the national court of last instance is obliged to do so.
Diskriminacija v nacionalnem kontekstu
† requesting a referral can concentrate the mind of the presiding judge and ensure that she/he gives proper consideration to the complaint, especially to the fact that it raises issues of Euro-pean rights;
3.2.E Kakþna podpora obstaja na dr™avni ravni za dostop do pravnih postopkov in kaj bi bilo treba storiti, da bi bile morebitne ovire prese™ene?
† national bodies, particularly public bodies, are impressed by its high profile and may take steps to avoid the exposure of discrimination at national level to pan-European scrutiny;
Ovire so lahko na primer: s pomanjkanje brezplaｲne pravne pomoｲi; s pomanjkanje znanja o direktivah in domaｲi protidiskriminacijski zakonodaji med sodniki, ombudsmani in upravnimi sodniki; s stroþki (bodisi stroþki sodnih postopkov ali stroþki tveganja, ｲe bo primer na sodiþｲu izgub-ljen); s dostop do sodiþｲ in sodnih postopkov (fiziｲni dostop › kje se nahajajo sodiþｲa in kje domovi prito™nikov, kakþna je dostopnost za invalide) ter do prevajalcev.
In addition, it is important to note that the national case is `stayed' (put aside) until the ECJ has decided the issue before it, and this delay of sometimes two years can have serious con-sequences for the complainant.
Podpora lahko vkljuｲuje npr.: s mo™nost, da zastopanje nudijo usposobljene nevladne organizacije ali sindikati; s brezplaｲno pravno pomoｲ (glej zgoraj).
Petitions to the European Parliament
3.2.F Postopki pred sodiþｲem Evropske skupnosti
The Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament can receive petitions from citizens of the Union who wish the committee to investigate their complaint that their rights under European Union law are not being properly respected.
V primerih spora glede institutov prava EU, lahko domaｲa sodiþｲa spro™ijo postopek o predhod-nem vpraþanju pred Sodiþｲem ES v Luksemburgu v skladu s ｲlenom 234 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
This could be done with a view to encouraging the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings against the offending State.
Postopek je lahko spro™en na zahtevo strank ali po odloｲitvi sodnika.
The Commission and the Parliament are bound by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights' provi-sion on the right to good administration (Article 41).
Vsako sodiþｲe lahko spro™i postopek, sodiþｲe zadnje instance (v Sloveniji je to Vrhovno sodiþｲe) pa je to dol™no storiti.
† Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a rea-sonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union.
Ta postopek je lahko zelo uｲinkovit, saj: s proþnja za spro™itev postopka o predhodnem vpraþanju osredotoｲi pozornost sodnika na pro-blem in zagotovi, da se sodnik osredotoｲi na prito™bo ter na dejstvo, da gre za pravice, zaþｲite-ne s pravom EU; s dr™avni organi pazijo na svoj ugled in se ™elijo izogniti podvr™enosti evropskemu nadzoru v zvezi z diskriminacijo na nacionalni ravni; s Sodiþｲe ES je edini organ, ki lahko poda konｲno razlago pojmov, doloｲenih v direktivah.
‹ the right of every person to be heard, before any individual measure which would affect him or her adversely is taken;
V tem primeru za specializiran postopek, ki ga lahko spro™ijo specializirani pravniki.
‹ the right of every person to have access to his or her file, while respecting the legitimate interest of confidentiality and of professional and business secrecy;
Poleg tega je potrebno upoþtevati, da postopek pred nacionalnim sodiþｲem v primeru spro™itve postopka pred Sodiþｲem ES miruje, dokler Sodiþｲe ES ne odloｲi o predhodnem vpraþanju.
‹ the obligation of the administration to give reasons for its decisions.
Ta odlog, ki vｲasih traja tudi dve leti, ima lahko hude posledice za prito™nika.
† Every person may write to the institutions of the Union in one of the languages of the Treaties and must have an answer in the same language.
Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za peticije sprejema peticije dr™avljanov EU, ki odbor prosijo, da odloｲi o njihovih prito™bah, v katerih zatrjujejo, da so bile njihove pravice, zaþｲitene s pravom EU, krþene.
Complaints to the European Court of Human Rights
3.2.H Opozarjanje Evropske komisije na diskriminatorne upravne prakse
In addition, when all effective national legal remedies have been exhausted, a person may, if the case concerns issues covered by the European Convention on Human Rights, apply to the Euro-pean Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
Nevladne organizacije lahko piþejo Evropski komisiji, tak postopek pa je pogosto hitrejþi od tiste-ga, opisanega pod toｲko 3.2.G. Komisijo se lahko prosi, da zoper dr™avo ｲlanico spro™i postopek zaradi krþitve obveznosti implementacije direktiv na nacionalni ravni.
This can be done under Article 14 of the Convention which states that:
Plen 41 Evropske ustavne pogodbe doloｲa:
Collective complaints can also be made under the Council of Europe's European Social Charter.
Vsakdo ima pravico, da institucije, organi in agencije Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepri-stransko, praviｲno in v razumnem roku.
Where the State is a party to the first Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, or has accepted the right of individual petition under the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination or the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimi-nation Against Women, complaints can be brought to those committees.
Vsakdo ima pravico, da mu Unija v skladu s sploþnimi naｲeli, ki so skupna zakonodajam dr™av ｲlanic, povrne kakrþno koli þkodo, ki jo pri opravljanju svojih dol™nosti povzroｲijo institucije ali uslu™benci Unije.
Everyone in a NGO who takes up the case of an individual or a group of individuals must be aware of the need to observe high standards of professionalism, including confidentiality and efficient management of case files.
Ko so izｲrpana vsa pravna sredstva na nacionalni ravni (vkljuｲno z ustavno prito™bo), lahko oseba vlo™i prito™bo na Evropsko sodiþｲe za ｲlovekove pravice, pri tem pa se sklicuje na krþitev Evropske konvencije o zaþｲiti ｲlovekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboþｲin.
Identify the suspect groups and suspect situations in the national context ̌ the participants may wish to voice their own prejudices, or the prejudices they perceive to be prevalent, anonymously at this point ̌ moving on to more open discussion once the sensitive issues have been brought out into the open anonymously. The national trainers will decide whether this anonymity is neces-sary/appropriate.
To lahko stori na podlagi ｲlena 14 konvencije v kombinaciji s þe kakþnim drugim ｲlenom konven-cije, ali pa na podlagi protokola 12 h konvenciji, ｲe ga je dr™ava ｲlanica Sveta Evrope ratificirala.
Possibly, in Malta, the most widespread grounds of discrimination are race and sexual orientation.
Na podlagi Evropske socialne listine pa so lahko vlo™ene skupinske prito™be.
Yet discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation is felt everywhere.
3.2.J. Druga pravna sredstva na mednarodni ravni
The mentality of the Maltese people in this respect is changing, though very slowly.
Prebivalci Slovenije lahko vlo™ijo prito™bo trem odborom, ki delujejo v okviru Organizacije zdru™e-nih narodov, in sicer: s Odbor za ｲlovekove pravice (HRC); s Odbor za odpravo diskriminacije ™ensk (CEDAW); in s Odbor za odpravo rasne diskriminacije (CERD).
In March 2002, a delegation from the Malta Gay Rights Movement met with the Archbishop of Malta. This was the first time that the highest representative of the local Catholic Church ever held an official meeting with a gay movement.
Slovenija je namreｲ podpisala in ratificirala prvi izbirni protokol k Mednarodnem paktu o dr™avljanskih in politiｲnih pravicah, ki dovoljuje vlo™itev prito™be na Odbor za ｲlovekove pra-vice, in izbirni protokol h Konvenciji o odpravi diskriminacije ™ensk, ki dovoljuje prito™bo na Odbor za odpravo diskriminacije ™ensk.
In May 2003, a delegation from the Malta Gay Rights Movement met with the then Minister for Social Policy to discuss the lack of specific mention of sexual orientation as a ground of discrimination.
Prav tako je Slovenija sprejela pristojnost Odbora za odpravo rasne diskriminacije, da lahko obravnava prito™be posameznikov zoper Slovenijo.
Consequently, the first specific mention of sexual orientation in relation to discrimination was introduced in Maltese legislation by virtue of Legal Notice 297 of 2003.
Veｲinoma za te postopke velja, da morajo biti pred vlo™itvijo prito™be ™e izｲrpana vsa domaｲa pravna sredstva in da se prito™bo presoja le, ｲe zadeva ™e ni obravnavana pred drugimi med-narodnimi telesi.
In 2004, Legal Notice 461 was issued.
Stroþkov s temi postopki ni (ni sodnih taks).
This legal notice specifically included sexual orientation as one of the grounds for discrimination.
Odloｲitve so za dr™ave ｲlanice sicer zavezujoｲe, vendar niso predvidene ustrezne sankcije za primer, ｲe jih dr™ava ｲlanica ne spoþtuje.
Though these steps are highly commendable given the socio-religious context prevailing in Malta, much still needs to be done. One of the areas wherein no legislation has been introduced relates to the rights of same-sex couples.
Glede na to, da ti odbori presojajo tudi periodiｲna poroｲila dr™av ｲlanic o stanju ｲlovekovih pravic v Sloveniji, bi morale nevladne organizacije odborom poroｲati o primerih diskriminaci-je.
Although there have recently been extensive amendments to the civil code of Malta in relation to personal rights, no specific rights were extended to same sex couples. Thus, for example, the definition of `family' does not include same-sex cohabiting part-ners.
Na ta naｲin bodo odbori bolje seznanjeni s stanjem v dr™avi in bodo zmo™ni Sloveniji, ko bo njeno poroｲilo v obravnavi, predoｲiti informacije, ki jih bodo prejeli od nevladnih organi-zacij, Slovenija pa se bo morala pred odborom zagovarjati.
One of the most recent phenomena in Malta is the high increase in irregular immigration. This has led to growing racism which could potentially increase even more.
Vsakdo, ki v okviru nevladne organizacije prevzame primer posameznika ali skupine, se mora zavedati, da je pri reþevanju zadev potrebno spoþtovati visoke standarde strokovnosti, vkljuｲ-no z zaupnostjo in uｲinkovitim upravljanjem baze podatkov o primerih.
One can regularly hear the disparaging comments addressed by the man in the street towards persons who are detained as irregular immigrants or who have been granted asylum or refugee status.
Pe nevladna organi-zacija posamezniku ne more pomagati pri reþevanju njegovega primera, mu mora zagotoviti vse potrebne informacije in ga napotiti na ustrezno institucijo, ki mu lahko zagotovi pomoｲ in podporo.
It should be noted that there is a big difference between those who express preoccupation because of the influx of immigrants and those showing signs of racism.
Razpravljajte o konceptu tolerance in pluralnosti v kontekstu nacionalne situacije na podroｲju diskriminacije.
There have also been reports of ill-treatment of refugees who had asked their employer for the payment of their wages.
Opredelite skupine, ki so na sploþno bolj podvr™ene diskriminaciji, ter situacije, v katerih prihaja do diskriminacije.
If a decision is not taken within one year of applying and the delay is not attributable to the applicant, Member States shall `decide the condi-tions for granting access to the labour market for the applicant'.
Opiþite specifiｲna podroｲja, kjer za posamezne skupine obstaja veｲje tveganje diskriminacije (zaposlovanje doloｲenih skupin, rasna diskriminacija na vseh dru™benih podroｲjih ipd.).
Rejection will mean that the asylum-seeker will be repatriated.
Premislite o tem, da navidezno liberalne nevladne organizacije pogosto gojijo predsodke.
To try and curtail this, in January 2005, the Employment and Training Corporation introduced the `Training and employment exposure scheme' (TEES) aimed at integrating the registered unem-ployed who are over 40 years of age in the labour market. Furthermore, incentives are given under
M a t e r i a l i : s besedila direktiv in nacionalne zakonodaje; s priloga Diskriminacija v Sloveniji (Admir Baltiｱ) s priloga Jasminke Dediｱ
Discrimination in the national context the business promotion act regulations, 2002, to employers who train and employ persons over the age of 40.
Uｲni cilji za udele™ence s Raziskati razliｲne dejavnosti in storitve, ki jih lahko zagotavljajo nevladne organizacije z name-nom pomagati v boju proti diskriminaciji na praktiｲni ravni
Recognise, and ensure that those being trained recognise, that apparently liberal NGOs often harbour their own prejudices.
Mnoge ™rtve diskriminacije se ne zavedajo svojih pravic in ne vedo, kaj storiti in na koga se obrni-ti po pomoｲ.
*** In this part of the seminar it is essential that the delegates from particular interest groups should be asked (in group work, see `Methodology' section) to identify suspect groups other than their own, and the problems they face.
Takþni dogodki so lahko idealni za sreｲanja in dogovarjanja za individualne sestanke z drugimi organizacijami, ki iþｲejo partnerje, kot tudi z donatorji, ki lahko neposredno financirajo storit-ve. Za dialog z vlado o podpori teh aktivnosti (ｲe takþno podporo potrebujejo) se lahko nev-ladne organizacije sklicujejo na ｲlen 14 Direktive Sveta 2000/78/ES in ｲlen 12 Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES.
*** Their findings should then be critiqued by the interest groups concerned with the rights of the suspect group in question.
s sodelovanje z drugimi organizacijami, to je z nevladnimi organizacijami, ki se prav tako ukvar-jajo z diskriminacijo, vendar na drugaｲen naｲin.
† For the participants to have explored various activities and services that NGOs can undertake and provide in order to help combat discrimination on a practical level.
Razliｲne metode osveþｲanja v þirþi skupnosti so opredeljene v delu ‚Znanja in orodja§.
Although some people are consciously prejudiced against certain groups and knowingly dis-criminate against them, many more members of society are unaware that their conduct and attitudes are discriminatory. This lack of awareness is sometimes one of the first hurdles to be overcome in the efforts made to work towards equality.
Nevladne organizacije lahko igrajo pomembno vlogo pri spremljanju in vplivanju na razvoj politik in prava zaradi svojega edinstvenega neodvisnega polo™aja, preko katerega lahko organe oblasti opozorijo na te™ave in jim prenesejo svoje predloge za reþitev situacije.
There are many ways for NGOs to com-municate knowledge and information on equality issues to the social partners and the wider national community.
Nevladne organizacije morajo presoditi, ali so to aktivnosti, za opravljanje katerih so dovolj usposobljene (glej sekcijo Znanja in orodja).
This is a separate but related issue to raising awareness of the discrimination issues they seek to address. It is also often overlooked.
s izvajanje zakonodaje in ukrepov; s prakse in odnose v doloｲenih sektorjih (javna uprava, zaposlovanje, dostop do storitev); s uｲinek ukrepov na ranljive skupine.
† establishing a visible presence by participating in relevant meetings and events or by joining committees/task forces on issues of importance.
s z izvajanjem raziskav, zbiranjem podatkov in razvijanjem kazalcev.
† cooperating together with other organisations, that is, other NGOs with a shared, even if diverse, focus on discrimination issues.
Dobro spremljanje bo vodilo k ustreznim in zanesljivim informacijam in je predpogoj za uｲinkovi-to lobiranje.
This can include meeting, coordinating activities, and identifying priorities for the community.
Spremljanje z uporabo raziskav in lobiranjem lahko zajema: s poskus spodbujanja vlade s pomoｲjo sestankov ali pisem ministrom in javnim uradnikom, naj se priｲnejo ukvarjati s problemi; s odgovarjanje na posvetovalne dokumente;
‹ requesting specific areas of training;
Nevladne organizacije se morajo zavedati svoje sposobnosti nuditi podporo ™rtvam diskriminacije.
‹ establishing partnership with other organisations to implement specific programmes;
Za ta namen se lahko naslonijo na drugi odstavek ｲlena 9 Direktive Sveta 2000/78/ES in drugi odstavek ｲlena 7 Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES.
‹ understanding the relationship of NGO programmes to long-term government plans.
Nekatere nevladne organizacije bodo imele znanja in sredstva za natanｲno svetovanje in podporo, vkljuｲno s pravnim zastopanjem.
It is important for NGOs to be able to state collectively where their activities fit into these larger plans.
Druge nevladne organizacije bodo morda lahko pomagale ™rt-vam ugotoviti, ali obravnavanje, ki so ga bile dele™ne, predstavlja diskriminacijo, in jim pomagale z nadaljnjim poizvedovanjem.
Some NGOs are often better able to address an unmet need, offer an alternative viewpoint, and stimulate debate on issues that are not yet mainstreamed by the govern-ment.
Nekaterim skupinam nevladnih organizacij bo morda primanjkova-lo znanja in izkuþenj, da bi sploh lahko postavile osnovno diagnozo, in te bi morale ™rtve nemudo-ma napotiti k tistim, ki so bolj usposobljeni za nudenje nasvetov in pomoｲi.
NGOs in raising their own profile will also be raising awareness of the particular areas of discrimi-nation which are their interest.
Nevladne organizacije morajo biti previdne, da na tem podroｲju ne poskuþajo storiti veｲ, kot so sposobne storiti.
Who are the target groups?
Zato je izvedba ‚revizije znanja§ tako pomembna (glej Znanja in orodja).
† By providing information, by organising campaigns, by educating and training, by doing research and making it public, by networking and building alliances, by doing media work.
Pri tem nudenju podpore je treba vedno upoþtevati obｲutljivost ™rtev in razpon ｲustev, ki jih do™ivlja-jo (jeza, pomanjkanje samozavesti, nenaklonjenost razkrivanju ali ponavljanju do™ivetih ™alitev › ustnih ali drugih, obｲutek osamitve, strah pred izgubo sredstev za pre™ivljanje, strah pred povra-ｲilnimi ukrepi, strah pred viktimizacijo).
† By identifying examples of conscious or unconscious discrimination which occur, particularly where these involve inhuman or degrading treatment.
Pri nudenju podpore je treba tudi upoþtevati priｲakovanja ™rtve glede ukrepov, ki jih je mo™no izvesti.
† By providing reasons, understandable by and acceptable to the community at large, why such discrimination is prohibited and what is the significance of the fact that this prohibition is writ-ten into law.
Nudenje strokovne, a tudi soｲutne podpore, je bistvenega pomena.