natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
So for instance, in the agreement concludedrecently with Gabon, the licence fee for vessel ownerswas increased from EUR 25 to 35 per tonne of tuna,while the European Union’s share per tonne droppedfrom EUR 75 to 65.
V sedanjemsporazumu z Gabonom, denimo, se je prispevek lastnikovplovil pri stroških za dovoljenje s 25 EUR povečal na 35 EUR na tono tunine, prispevek Evropske unije pa seje s 75 EUR zmanjšal na 65 EUR.
Under what are known as “mixed”agreements, the licence fee is set in proportion to the vessel’s tonnage.
Pri tako imenovanih“mešanih” sporazumih je cena dovoljenja sorazmerna s tonažo ladij.
As a result, a very high proportion of global fish stocks,which until then fell under the regime of the high seas,came to be governed by a patchwork of national regulations.
Po tej fazi se je velik delež svetovnih staležev rib, ki so dotlej sodili v oddaljenega morja, znašel v mozaikunacionalnih pristojnosti.
To maintain access to certain stocks – notably African stocks they had fished since the colonial period –, the European Union Member States had tonegotiate fisheries agreements with the coastal countries.
Da bi države Evropske unije šenaprej imele dostop do nekaterih staležev – še zlasti doafriških staležev, ki jih izkoriščajo že od kolonialnegaobdobja naprej – so morale s pogajanji doseči sporazumeo ribolovu z obalnimi državami.
Since fisheries policy is a common policy of the European Union, the Commission has exclusive competence tonegotiate such agreements, while consulting with the Member States and the sector.
Ker je ribištvo skupna politika Evropske unije, ima Komisija izključno pristojnost za pogajanja za sklenitevtakšnih sporazumov, in sicer ob posvetovanju z državamičlanicami in sektorjem.
The Community fleetthus benefits from a network of agreements covering the EEZs of some 20 countries, in the Northern and Southern hemispheres alike.
Za ladjevje Skupnosti tako veljacela mreža sporazumov, ki se nanašajo na izključno ekonomsko cono kakih dvajsetih držav severa in juga.
See p. 9.
Razlage str. 9.
Partnering with developing countries for responsible fishing
Razvijati odgovorno ribištvo v partnerstvu z državami v razvoju
Since developing countries do not fully exploit their fish resources, they allow other states to fish intheir territorial waters in exchange for financial compensation.
Države v razvoju ne izkoriščajo vseh svojih ribolovnih virov. Zato drugim državam dovolijo dostop do svojih teritorialnih voda in jim tako prepustijo del svojih virov proti plačilu finančnega prispevka.
When these countries decide to establishpolitical and economic relations with the Community on fisheries, agreements are negotiated to determinethe access conditions.
Če se te države odločijo za vzpostavitev politične in gospodarske povezave s Skupnostjo na tempodročju, takšne pogoje o dostopu določijo s sporazumi o ribolovu.
With the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy in 2002, the European Union’saim is to transform these fisheries agreements with Southern countries into genuine partnerships for the development of sustainable and responsible fishing.
Evropska unija si vse od reformeskupne ribiške politike leta 2002 prizadeva za napredovanje svojih sporazumov o ribolovu z državamijuga v učinkovita partnerstva za razvoj trajnostnega in odgovornega ribištva.
Catches by the European fleet fishing under these agreements come from surplus fish stocks, i.e. the partof the stock which the coastal state’s fleet is not able toexploit.
Ulov evropskega ladjevja, ki lovi na podlagi teh sporazumov, temelji na ribolovnih presežkih, to pomenina delu staležev, ki ga ladjevje obalne države povsem neizkorišča.
This exploitable surplus is evaluated as accuratelyas possible during conclusion of the fisheries agreements,based on scientific advice.
Takšen presežek se kar se da natančno oceniob sklenitvi sporazuma o ribolovu, in sicer na podlagiznanstvenih mnenj.
As a rule, quotas (where these exist) and other formsof catch limitation are determined multilaterally, withinthe competent regional tuna fisheries organisation, andany such stipulations must naturally be taken intoaccount when bilaterally agreeing levels of fishingeffort.
seveda upoštevati pri dvostransko dogovorjenem ribolovnem naporu.
For instance, the new protocol with Comorosprovides for 8 fewer long liner licenses than the previousagreement, in accordance with the recommendations of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission.Moreover, thisdecrease in tuna fishing effort is a feature of all therecently renewed protocols, reflecting the drive toprotect fish resources.
Tako novi protokol o sporazumu s Komori določa 8 dovoljenj za plovila s parangli manj od prejšnjega, kar je v skladu s priporočili Komisije za tunev Indijskem oceanu. Takšno zmanjševanje ribolovneganapora za tune je značilno tudi za vse obnovitve protokolov,kar odseva željo po zaščiti ribolovnega vira.
The agreement signed last December with Gabon also reduces the number of licenses by 40% (for more details on tropical tunafishing, see Fishing in Europe No 23, September2004).
Tudi decembrapodpisani sporazum z Gabonom predvideva 40-odstotnozmanjšanje števila dovoljenj (za podrobnejše informacijeo ribolovu tropskih tunov si preberite Evropsko ribištvo,št. 23, september 2004).
Tuna first
Mešani sporazumi
Mixed agreements
Najprej tun
Over the last 20 years or so, technical progress in refrigerated transport and changing patterns of European consumer demand have led our fleet to pursueother tropical stocks than tuna.
Zaradi tehnološkega napredka pri prevozu hlajenih vsebnikov in gibanja povpraševanja evropskih potrošnikovje naše ladjevje v zadnjih dvajsetih letih moralo polegtuna črpati še iz drugih tropskih staležev.
When a fisheries agreementcontains provisions on species other than tuna, it isreferred to as a mixed agreement.
Sporazum o ribolovu, ki poleg določb o tunu vsebuje tudi določbe o drugih vrstah, je mešani sporazum.
The European Unioncurrently has six mixed agreements with Southern countries.EU vessels catch deep-water species in Senegal and Mauritania, for example, shrimps in Guinea-Bissau,various demersal and pelagic species in Morocco, etc.
Evropska unija imatrenutno sklenjenih šest mešanih sporazumov z državamijuga. Naši čolni izkoriščajo zlasti vrste iz globokih voda Senegala in Mavretanije, pa tudi kozice v Gvineji Bissau,različne pridnene vrste ter več pelagičnih in pridnenihvrst v Maroku itd.
Historically and quantitatively, tuna ranks first in the EU’s fisheries agreements with Southern countries.
Pri teh vrstah se sporazumi o ribolovu nanašajo na skupnokapaciteto ladjevja s pooblaščenim dostopom do izključneekonomske cone tretje države, ki je izražena v tonahbruto registrske tonaže.
The 15 protocols currently in force all contain provisionson this species.
Z zgodovinskega in količinskega vidika je tun na prvemmestu po sporazumih o ribolovu med EU in državamijuga.
These agreements give European tunafleets what could be called a “right of pursuit”.
Vseh petnajst trenutno veljavnih protokolov s temidržavami vsebuje določbe v zvezi s to vrsto.
Tropicaltuna are highly migratory, travelling widely both throughthe high seas and close along the coasts.
Ti sporazumipodeljujejo evropskim ladjevjem za ribolov tunov pravico,ki bi jo lahko imenovali “pravica do pregona”.
So as to beable to continue fishing without interruption when aschool of tuna enters a coastal state’s EEZ, the vesselmust be authorised to operate there.
Tropski tunise kot izraziti selivci dejansko gibljejo v oddaljenih morjih,pa tudi vzdolž obale.
It is therefore vitalfor European fleets working in these parts of the worldto have fishing licences which cover the entire coastalong which they operate.
Da bi ladja lahko nemoteno lovilanaprej, ko jata tunov doseže izključno ekonomsko cononeke obalne države, mora biti pooblaščena za ribolov na tistem območju.
For these species, the fisheries agreements cover thetotal capacity of the fleet authorised to enter the thirdcountry’s EEZ, expressed in gross registered tonnage.
Evropska ladjevja, ki lovijo v tehzemljepisnih širinah, morajo torej nujno imeti ribolovnadovoljenja, ki veljajo za vse obale v njihovem delovnemobmočju.
Promoting responsible fishing in Europe e
Spodbujati odgovorno ribištvo v Evropi o
With its 2002 reform, however, the European Union decided not to limit its fisheries agreements with Southerncountries to the acquisition of fishing possibilities in their territorial waters.
Vendar se je Evropska unija odločila, da po svoji reformiiz leta 2002 svojih sporazumov o ribolovu z državami jugane bo omejila na preprost nakup ribolovnih možnosti v njihovih teritorialnih vodah.
Since that date, the UE has madechanges that transform these agreements into real partnerships.
Od leta 2002 je tako spodbujalanapredovanje teh sporazumov v prava partnerstva.
As it is difficult to evaluate in advance the quantity of ahighly migratory species that will be caught in any givenplace, the tuna agreements simply specify the numberof vessels authorised to enter a third country’s fishingground.
Konkretno gre za pomoč državam v razvoju pri oblikovanjuin vzpostavitvi njihove lastne ribiške politike, da se ugodinjihovi želji po gospodarskem razvoju, pri tem pa sezagotovi zaščita vira.
For example, the new tuna agreement with Gabon covers 24 seining vessels and 16 long liners,meaning that no more than 24 seining vessels and 16 long liners from the European fleet may be found in Gabon’s EEZ at any one time.
Kot povsod po svetu mnogi tropskistaleži, če začnemo z vrstami tuna, v resnici kažejo znakeusihanja.
In return for this right,Europe pays Gabon a total of EUR 860 000 a year.
Politiko upravljanja ribolovnega vira je torej nujnotreba vzpostaviti tudi v državah juga.
As part of this payment, each vessel pays a licence fee calculated on the basis of a lump-sum tonnage(based on the average catches in previous years).
Novi sporazumz Gabonom, ki se v celoti nanaša na ribolov tuna, denimodoloča 24 plovil s potegalkami in 16 plovil s parangli.
If this tonnage is exceeded, vessel owners pay a supplement in proportion to their catches.
To pomeni, da je lahko v gabonski izključni ekonomskiconi hkrati največ 24 plovil s potegalkami in 16 plovil s parangli, in sicer proti plačilu skupnega evropskegaprispevka v višini 860 000 EUR letno.
The idea is to help the developing countries to put inplace their own fisheries policies that can help themmeet their aim of economic development while protectingfish resources.
Cena dovoljenja zavsako ladjo se izračuna na podlagi povprečne tonaže naladjo (na podlagi povprečnega ulova iz prejšnjih let).
Indeed, as everywhere else in the world,
Če se ta tonaža preseže, lastniki plovil plačajo dodatek,ki je sorazmeren z njihovim ulovom.
All the European Union’s fisheries agreements with Southern countries concern tuna.
Vsi sporazumi o ribolovu Evropske unije z državami juga zadevajo tune.
Some also include provisions on other species.
Nekateri med njimi vsebujejo tudi določbe o drugih vrstah.
In the new agreement with Gabon, for example, 60% ofthe financial contribution paid by the Union will be spenton development of the local fisheries policy.
V novem protokolu s Komori bo 60% od 2,3 milijona EURevropskega finančnega prispevka pripadlo komorski ribiškipolitiki.
When concluding an agreement, the two parties nowbegin with a general review of the situation.
Tudi tukaj bo porabo teh sredstev določil mešaniodbor.
In the new protocol with Comoros, 60% of the Europeanfinancial compensation of EUR 2.3 million will be allottedto Comoran fisheries policy.
Poleg tega se preučijo nevarnosti, ki bi jih ribolov lahkopovzročil za vir in okolje, da se na podlagi tega sprejmejopopravni ukrepi.
Any dangers fishing may pose to resources or the environment are also carefully examined so that remedialmeasures may be adopted. Wherever possible, and inthe mutual interests of both parties, the partnershipagreement will favour measures to promote the creationof joint ventures, the transfer of know-how and technologies,and investments in management capacities.
Partnerski sporazum bo v čim bolj in v vzajemnem interesu obeh strani podpiral ukrepe zaspodbujanje ustanavljanja mešanih družb, prenos znanjain tehnologij ter naložbe v upravljavske sposobnosti.
Responsible fishing with substantial means
Odgovorno ribištvo z izdatnimi sredstvi
And as a last example, the new protocol with Moroccoallocates EUR 14 million of Europe’s EUR 36 millionannual contribution to projects in support of the local fisheries sector: modernisation and restructuring of the small-scale fisheries fleet; financial compensation forthe elimination of drift nets; the development of research,training and fisheries organisations; improvement of landing infrastructure; etc.
Še zadnji primer: novi protokol z Marokom namenja 14 od36 milijonov EUR letnega evropskega prispevkaprojektom pomoči za lokalni ribiški sektor: posodobitevin prestrukturiranje ladjevja za mali priobalni ribolov, finančna nadomestila za opuščanje visečih mrež, razvojznanstvenih raziskav, izobraževanja in ribiških organizacij,okrepitev infrastrukture za raztovarjanje itd.
With this new type of partnership, the European Unionintends to contribute to its partner countries’ developmentwhile promoting the objectives of the reformed Common Fisheries Policy to secure sustainable and responsiblefishing.
Evropska unija namerava s to novo obliko partnerstvaprispevati k razvoju partnerskih držav in tako cilje svojereforme skupne ribiške politike razširiti na področje trajnostnega in odgovornega ribištva.
Fisheries and aqua c u lt u r
v Evropi o
Every new agreement concluded (or protocol renewed)thus contains a “partnership” chapter.
V tej povezavi vsak nov sporazum o ribolovu (ali vsakaobnovitev protokola) obsega poglavje “partnerstvo”.
The two partiesagree to allocate a share of the financial compensationpaid by the European Union to the introduction of a fisheries policy in the partner country, which is free todetermine its own priority areas for action.
V okviru tega se obe strani obvežeta, da bosta relativnovelik del finančnega prispevka Evropske unije namenili zavzpostavitev ribiške politike partnerske države, ki lahkoprosto odloča o prednostnih intervencijskih področjih.
In practice,such priority is often placed on control and surveillanceissues, vocational training for seafarers, support forscientific observation mechanisms and support for private and public investments in the sector.
V praksi se ta področja pogosto posvečajo vprašanjemnadzora in spremljanja, strokovnega izobraževanja mornarjev, pomoči za sisteme znanstvenih opazovalcevin podpore za zasebne in javne naložbe v sektor.
Northern waters: exchanges which matter to both sides
Severna morja: pomembne izmenjave za obe strani
The European Union’s fisheries agreements with Northern European countries offer advantageous exchanges of quotas, opening up important areas of activity for the Community fleet.
Sporazumi o ribolovu Evropske unije z nordijskimi državami omogočajo zanimive izmenjave kvot.
Theirterritorial waters are home to stocks for which Community waters cannot meet Communitydemand.
Tako odpirajo območja dejavnosti, ki so pomembna za ladjevje Skupnosti.
At the same time, these countries alsohave significant need of certain species which arefound in European Union waters.
Norveška, Islandija in Fersko otočje, ki sozemljepisno zelo blizu EU, imajo pomembnoribiško in predelovalno gospodarstvo.
The reciprocityagreements concluded with them are thereforehighly advantageous to both parties: the Communityfleet can fish for certain species in their territorialwaters, in exchange for which vessels from Norway, Iceland and the Faeroe Islands can fish for other species in Community waters.
Teritorialnevode teh držav dajejo zavetje staležem, ki jih vvodah Skupnosti primanjkuje glede na povpraševanje.Nasprotno pa imajo te države močno potrebo ponekaterih vrstah, ki so v vodah Evropske unije.Vzajemni sporazumi, sklenjeni z njimi, so torejzelo ugodni za obe strani: ladjevje Skupnostilahko lovi nekatere vrste v njihovih teritorialnihvodah, v zameno za to pa lahko ladje teh trehdržav lovijo druge vrste v vodah Skupnosti.
Let’s start with the example of the Community’s fisheries agreement with Norway, the most important the EU hasconcluded with a third country.
Začnimo s primerom iz sporazuma o ribolovu, ki ga ima Skupnost z Norveško in je najpomembnejši izmedvseh, kar jih je EU sklenila s tretjimi državami.
agreement with the Faeroe Islands. This is because the quotas in question concern different stocks (locatedin different places) or by-catches of certain target species(fishing for a species caught simultaneously with anotherfor which a quota is exchanged).
različne staleže (ki so na različnih krajih) ali na prilovenekaterih ciljnih vrst (neko vrsto se lovi hkrati kot nekodrugo vrsto, za katero se izmenja kvota).
A second feature of the exchanges is the sharing of certain stocks. Since the fishing grounds of the two partiesto the agreement are adjacent, it can be necessary toshare certain stocks which naturally move betweenthese two areas.
Druga posebnost zadeva delitev nekaterih staležev.Kadar ribolovni območji obeh strani pri sporazumu mejitaeno na drugo, nekateri staleži glede na svoja premikanjaprehajajo iz enega v drugo in jih je treba razdeliti.
This is the case for Western mackerel,for instance, for which the sharing of the quota is negotiated as part of the EU’s annual agreement with the Faeroe Islands.
Tako jepri staležu zahodne skuše, o katere delitvi kvote se spogajanji sporazumeta obe strani v okviru letnega sporazuma s Ferskim otočjem.
Other reciprocity agreements
Drugi vzajemni sporazumi
Part of the agreement concerns the sharing of fishingpossibilities for stocks in certain zones of the North Sea(cod, haddock, saithe, whiting, plaice, mackerel and herring).
Enaka načela o izmenjavi in delitvi urejajo tudi naše sporazume o ribolovu s Ferskim otočjem in Islandijo, še dvema evropskima državama, ki nista članici EU.
Another part organises the exchange of quotasbetween the two parties.
Po eni strani se nanaša na delitev ribolovnih možnosti za staleže v nekaterih območjih Severnega morja (trska,vahnja, saj, mol, morska plošča, skuša in sled).
Provisions agreed during thelatest negotiations give the Community fleet the right to catch 61% of its quota for blue whiting and 62 000 tonnes1of Atlantic-Scandinavian herring in Norwegian waters, in exchange for granting Norway reciprocal rights in Community waters.
Po drugistrani pa ureja izmenjave kvot med obema stranema.Poleg drugih določb so zadnja pogajanja omogočila ladjevju Skupnosti izpolnitev 61% njegove kvote za sinjimol in ulov 62 000 ton1za atlantski sled v norveškihvodah in nasprotno.
Beginning thisyear, the agreement also authorises the landing and transitof certain Communitycatches on Norwegian territory,which greatly facilitates operations for fisherman workingin that part of the world.
Od letos naprej sporazum dovoljujetudi iztovarjanje in prevoz nekaterih ulovov Skupnosti na norveškem ozemlju, kar bo zelo olajšalo delo ribičev na tej zemljepisni širini.
This provision may even beextended to other stocks in the future.
V prihodnje je predvidena tudirazširitev te določbe na druge staleže.
The fisheries agreement with Iceland concerns only twospecies.
Sporazum o ribolovu z Islandijo se nanaša samo na dve vrsti.
The Community fleet has a quota for redfish in Iceland’s waters.
Ladjevje Skupnosti lovi kvoto rdečih okunov v islandskih vodah. V zameno EU prepusti Islandiji del svoje grenlandske kvote kapelanov.
This example shows how agreements between the Community and certain countries in Northern Europe arestructured by two fundamental concerns: the commonmanagement of certain stocks, and reciprocity in the form of an exchange of quotas.
Sporazumi med Skupnostjo in nekaterimi nordijskimidržavami torej odgovarjajo dvema temeljnima načeloma:skupnemu upravljanju nekaterih staležev in načelu vzajemnosti, ki se izraža z izmenjavo kvot.
This exchange is negotiatedbetween the two parties annually, once fishing possibilitieshave been set, in line with their own interests.
Takšna izmenjavase vsako leto s pogajanji uskladi glede na lastne intereseobeh strani, ko se določijo ribolovne možnosti.
Under the agreement with the Faeroe Islands, the EUgrants that country’s fleet part of its quotas for industrial fishing.
Kar zadeva sporazum s Ferskim otočjem, EU prepustiferskemu ladjevju del svojih kvot industrijskih vrst.
In exchange, British, French, Dutch, German and Danish vessels have access to Faeroese waters to fish for quotas of whitefish, blue whiting and mackerel.
V zameno imajo britanski, francoski, nizozemski, nemškiin danski čolni dostop do obalnih voda Ferskih otokov za izkoriščanje kvot belih rib ter sinjih molov in skuš.
Fisheries and aqua c u lt u r
v Evropi o ib og o js tv
The need for this type of agreement originated with the extension of fishing zones to 200 miles.
Razlog za obstoj tovrstnega sporazuma izhaja iz razširitveribolovnega območja v pasu 200 milj.
Before thisdevelopment, certain species were found in the high seasand were thus accessible to all.
Nekatere vrste sose pred takšno razširitvijo nahajale v oddaljenem morju inso bile tako neposredno dostopne.
After the extension, thesestocks were now located within European Union waters(or the waters of the Northern countries).
Po razširitvi pa so seti staleži znašli v vodah Skupnosti (in nasprotno v vodahnordijskih držav).
So as to enableboth the EU and these third countries to continue theirfishing activities, operators had now to be authorised to fish in the other party’s waters.
Da bi lahko še naprej lovili v tretjih državahin evropskih državah, so ribiči odslej potrebovali ribolovnodovoljenje za vode tretjih držav.
These fisheries agreements with the countries of Northern Europe are very important for the EU.
Ti sporazumi o ribolovu z nordijskimi tretjimi državami so zelo pomembni za EU.
Not only do theyopen up important activity zones for the Community fleet,but they also establish good neighbourly relations withmajor fishing countries, which are also important tradingpartners for the EU as a whole.
V prvi vrsti odpirajo območjadejavnosti, ki so pomembna za ladjevje Skupnosti. Nadaljepa vzpostavljajo dobre sosedske odnose s pomembnimiribiškimi državami, ki so tudi najpomembnejši trgovinskipartnerji.
March 2006
To pa zaradi tega, ker se kvote nanašajo na marec 2006
Greenland: supporting local development
Grenlandija: podpirati lokalni razvoj
Since it withdrew from the Community in 1985, this territory has enjoyed a fisheries agreement whereby, in exchange forfinancial compensation, the EU fleet can exploit part of Greenland’s stocks.
Od leta 1985, datuma njenega izstopaiz Evropske unije, za to ozemlje velja sporazum o ribolovu z Evropsko unijo: proti plačilu finančnegaprispevka ta lahko izkorišča del grenlandskih staležev.
Since 2003, this fisheriesagreement has been evolving into a true partnership agreement.
Od leta 2003 naprej se ta sporazum o ribolovurazvija v pravi partnerski sporazum.
Since the annual financial compensation of EUR 42 millioncannot be changed before the protocol’s expiry in 2006,the Commission proposed at the time of the mid-termreview of the protocol (2001-2006) that the financialcontribution be rationalised and divided into two separate allocations.
Za razumevanje naših odnosov z Grenlandijo na v višini 42 milijonov EUR ni mogel spremeniti pred iztekomveljavnosti protokola v letu 2006, je Komisija pri vmesnireviziji protokola (2001-2006) predlagala njegovo racionalizacijo in porazdelitev med dva namena uporabe.
The first allocation is for the purchase of fishing possibilities (EUR 31 million).
Prvi namen: nakup ribolovnih možnosti (31 milijonov EUR).V zvezi s tem je bilo treba zmanjšati kvote za grenlandskestaleže, ki kažejo znake usihanja, kot je trska.
Given the need to reducequotas for stocks showing signs of depletion, such ascod, these were replaced by additional quotas for nonproblematic species (Greenland halibut, Atlantic halibut,shrimps), new quotas for snowcrab, and experimentalfisheries that could result in quotas for new species.
Te so takonadomestile dodatne kvote za neproblematične vrste(grenlandska morska plošča, navadni jezik, kozica),uvedba kvot za snežnega pajka in poskusni ribolovi, ki bi lahko privedli do kvot za nove vrste.