natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(a) before his departure, he must have been registered with the employment ser -vices of the competent State as a person seeking work and must have remained available for at least four weeks after becoming unemployed.
(a) pred odhodom mora biti prijavljen kot oseba, ki i�če delo, in mora ostati na voljo službam za zaposlovanje pristojne države najmanj �tiri tedne po nastopu brezposelnosti.
However, the competent services or institutions may authorise his departure before such time has expired;
Pristojna služba ali nosilec pa lahko odobri njen odhod tudi pred iztekom tega roka;
(b) he must register as a person seeking work with the employment services of each of the Member States to which he goes and be subject to the control proced- ure organised therein.
(b) kot oseba, ki i�če delo, se mora prijaviti pri službi za zaposlovanje v vsaki od držav članic, v katero gre, in zanjo veljajo v njej organizirani postopki nadzora.
This condition shall be considered satisfied for the period before registration if the person concerned registered within seven days
Za dobo pred prijavo velja ta pogoj za izpolnjen, če se je oseba prijavila v sedmih dneh po datumu, ko je prenehala biti na razpolago službi za zaposlovanje v
‘Paragraph 7 of the date when he ceased to be available to the employment services of the State he left.
„Člen 7 državi, ki jo je zapustila.
In exceptional cases, this period may be extended by the competent services or institutions;
V izjemnih primerih lahko to dobo pristojna služba ali nosilec tudi podalj�a;
(1) is available to the employment services,
Do nadomestila za brezposelnost je upravičena oseba, ki
(2) has completed the eligibility period, and
1) je na razpolago službi za zaposlovanje,
(c) entitlement to benefits shall continue for a maximum period of three months from the date when the person concerned ceased to be available to the employment services of the State which he left, provided that the total duration of the benefits does not exceed the duration of the period of benefits he was entitled to under the legislation of the State.
(c) upravičenost do dajatev se nadaljuje največ tri mesece po datumu, ko je oseba prenehala biti na razpolago službam za zaposlovanje v državi, ki jo je zapustila, če skupno trajanje prejemanja dajatev ne preseže dobe, za katero bi bila oseba upravičena do dajatev po zakonodaji te države.
In the case of a seasonal worker such duration shall, moreover, be limited to the period remaining until the end of the season for which he was engaged.
V primeru sezonskega delavca je to trajanje omejeno na obdobje, ki preostaja do konca sezone, za katero je bil delavec zaposlen.
(3) has not finished the benefit period is entitled to unemployment benefit.
2) izpolnjuje pogoje o trajanju zavarovalnega razmerja in
B — The national legislation
B – Nacionalna ureditev
A person is available to the employment services if he can and is entitled to take up employment (subparagraph 3), and is capable of working (subparagraph 8), is willing to work (subparagraph 9) and is unemployed (subparagraph 12).
Na razpolago službi za zaposlovanje je oseba, ki lahko sprejme zaposlitev in jo ima pravico sprejeti (odstavek 3) ter je zmožna za delo (člen 8), pripravljena delati (člen 9) in brezposelna (člen 12).
The social security benefit at issue in these proceedings is governed by the AlVG, particularly Paragraphs 7, 16 and 23 thereof.
Socialnovarstvena dajatev, ki je predmet te zadeve, je predvidena v AlVG, zlasti v členih 7, 16 in 23 tega zakona.
The requirement that a person must have the capacity to work shall not apply in respect of unemployed persons who have been granted measures for professional rehabilitation, where such persons have achieved the purpose of those measures (Paragraph 300(1) and (3) of the Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz (General Law on Social Security; ASVG)) and completed the required eligibility period in accordance with those measures.
Pogoj zmožnosti za delo ne velja za brezposelne osebe, ki so bile upravičene do ukrepov za ponovno vključitev na trg dela in so dosegle cilj teh ukrepov (člen 300(1) in (3) Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz [zakonik o socialni varnosti, v nadaljevanju: ASVG]) in dopolnile zahtevano trajanje zavarovalnega razmerja po tem ukrepu.
On application by the unemployed person, and after hearing the Regionalbeirat (Regional Board), the suspension of unemploy -ment benefit under subparagraph 1(g) above may be lifted in exceptional circumstances for up to three months while the entitlement to benefit exists.
Na zahtevo brezposelne osebe se odpravi začasna ustavitev nadomestila za brezposelnost iz naslova odstavka 1(g), če so upo�tevne okoli�čine, potem ko regionalni svet poda mnenje, izpolnjene do tri mesece med upravičenostjo do dajatev (člen 18).
Exceptional circumstances are circumstances in the inter ests of terminating unemployment, in particular where the unemployed person provides evidence that he has gone abroad in order to seek employment, to introduce himself to an employer, to undertake training, or for compelling family reasons.
Upo�tevne okoli�čine so okoli�čine, ki pripomorejo h končanju obdobja brezposelnosti, zlasti kadar brezposelna oseba odide v tujino z izkazanim namenom, da bi tam na�la zaposlitev ali se zglasila pri delodajalcu ali opravila usposabljanje, ali okoli�čine, ki temeljijo na družinskih razlogih.
‘Paragraph 16
„Člen 16
Entitlement to unemployment benefit is suspended where:
Pravica do nadomestila za brezposelnost se začasno ustavi med
‘Paragraph 23
„Člen 23
Unemployed persons who have applied for:
Brezposelne osebe, ki so zaprosile za dodelitev
(1) a benefit on the ground of total or partial incapacity for work, a temporary
1) dajatve zaradi zmanj�ane zmožnosti za delo ali invalidnosti ali začasne dajatve iz naslova zakonskega sistema
(g) the person is abroad, to the extent that neither subparagraph 3 nor other provisions based on international treaties are applicable;
(g) bivanjem v tujini, če se odstavek 3 ali določbe, sprejete na podlagi mednarod- nih konvencij, ne uporabljajo;
PETERSEN payment under the statutory pension and accident benefits scheme, or
PETERSEN pokojninskega ali nezgodnega zavarovanja ali
(2) on the basis of the existing circumstances it is likely that the social security benefit will be granted, and
2) da obstoječe okoli�čine omogočajo, da se a priori predvidi dodelitev dajatev iz naslova socialnega zavarovanja, in
(3) in the case of number 2 of subparagraph 1, there is confirmation from the competent insurance body that it will probably be unable to give a defin- ite decision on the benefit within two months of the date of entitlement to the pension.
2) dajatve iz naslova starostnega zavarovanja iz splo�nega sistema socialnih zavarovanj ali na podlagi zakonika o socialni varnosti ali iz naslova sistema socialnih zavarovanj za trgovce ali kmete ali iz naslova posebne pokojnine na podlagi zakona o nočnem delu,
(2) a benefit on the ground of old age from the pension insurance scheme under the Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz, the Gewerbliches Sozialversicherungsgesetz (Law on Commercial and Industrial Social Security), or the Bauern-Sozial-versicherungsgesetz (Law on Farmers’ Social Security), or an exceptional benefit under the Nachtschwerarbeitsgesetz (Law on Strenuous Night Work)
3) da je v primeru iz odstavka 1(2) ustanova za pokojninsko zavarovanje poleg tega izdala dokazilo, na podlagi katerega je mogoče predvideti, da ne bo mogoče določiti načela obveznosti izplačila dajatev v dveh mesecih po datumu začetka pravice do pokojnine.
… may be granted an advance payment of that benefit or of unemployment allowance until the decision on their application is made.
[…] lahko do odločitve o njihovem zahtevku za dodelitev teh dajatev prejemajo predplačilo nadomestila za brezposelnost ali nujne pomoči.
An advance grant of the benefit or of unemployment allowance may be made if:
Za dodelitev predplačila nadomestila za brezposelnost ali nujne pomoči je potrebno,
The advance shall be granted in accordance with number 1 or 2 of subparagraph 1, in the amount of the benefit (or allowance) payable, subject to a maximum of one thirtieth of the average amount of the benefits, including child supplements.
Predplačilo se odobri v vi�ini nadomestila za brezposelnost (ali nujne pomoči), ki se izplača na podlagi odstavka 1(1) ali (2) v vi�ini zgornje meje, enake eni tridesetini povprečnega zneska dajatev, skupaj z otro�- kim dodatkom.
Where the regional office of the Arbeitsmarktservice is made aware by a written notice from the competent insurance body that the benefit will be lower than that amount, the advance payment shall be reduced accordingly.
Če je regionalna podružnica urada za zaposlovanje na podlagi pisnega obvestila nosilca socialne varnosti obve�čena, da bo predvidena dajatev nižja, se izplačano predplačilo ustrezno zmanj�a.
(1) apart from capacity to work, willingness to work and readiness to work under number 1 of Paragraph 7(3), the other requirements for the grant of the benefit are satisfied,
Predplačilo se dodeli za nazaj v primeru iz odstavka 1(2) od dneva nastanka upravičenosti do pokojnine, če je zadevna oseba vložila zahtevek v �tirinajstih dneh po izdaji potrdila iz odstav- ka 2(3).
OPINION OF MR RUIZ-JARABO — CASE C-228/07 benefit or as unemployment allowance for so long as and in the amount in which it has been paid, so that it shall not be necessary to pay any shortfall and the period of payment shall be shortened in accordance with Paragraph 18.’
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI RUIZ-JARABOJA – ZADEVA C-228/07 in znesek �teje za nadomestilo za brezposelnost ali nujno pomoč, to pa pomeni zlasti, da se naknadno ne izvr�i nobeno plačilo morebitne razlike in da se trajanje dajatve skraj�a na podlagi člena 18.“
If a regional office has granted an advance of a benefit or of unemployment allowance under subparagraph 1, any entitlement of the unemployed person to a benefit under number 1 or 2 of subparagraph 1 for the same period shall be assigned to the Federal Government, for the purpose of managing employment policy, in the amount of the benefit allocated by the regional office, except for sickness insurance contributions, provided that the regional office makes a claim to the competent social security institution for the entitlement to be assigned (assignment ipso jure).
Če je regionalna podružnica odobrila predplačilo na podlagi odstavka 1 ali nadomestilo za brezposelnost ali nujno pomoč, se pravica brezposelne osebe do dajatve na podlagi odstavka 1(1) ali (2) za isto obdobje prenese na zvezno državo zaradi vodenja politike trga dela v vi�ini dajatve, ki jo je odobrila regionalna podružnica, razen dajatev za zdravstveno zavarovanje, če regionalna podružnica uveljavlja prenos pri ustanovi za socialno zavarovanje (zakonski prenos).
That assignment of the entitlement shall be effective only up to the limit of the total amount of the benefits in respect of which payment is pending; the corresponding right of credit shall be preferential.
Pravica do dajatve se prenese samo do vi�ine �e dolgovanih zneskov in mora biti poplačana najprej.
Sickness insurance contributions paid out of unemployment insurance funds for the period identified in subparagraph 5 shall be reimbursed by competent statutory sickness insurance institutions through the Hauptverband der österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger (central association of Austrian social security institutions), at the percentage laid down by Paragraph 73(2) of the ASVG of the amounts which are reimbursed by the competent pension insurance institutions in accordance with subparagraph 5.
Dajatve za zdravstveno zavarovanje, izplačane iz sredstev zavarovanja za primer brezposelnosti (člen 42(3)) za obdobje iz odstavka 5, morajo povrniti nosilci zakonskega sistema zdravstvenega zavarovanja prek zveze avstrijskih ustanov za socialno zavarovanje glede na odstotni delež, določen v členu 73(2) ASVG, ki se uporablja za zneske, ki so jih povrnile ustanove za pokojninsko zavarovanje na podlagi odstavka 5.
If a pension is refused under subparagraph 1, the advance shall be regarded as a
Če se pokojnina na podlagi odstavka 1 zavrne, se predplačilo za odobrena obdobje
PETERSEN is suspended if the unemployed person lives abroad (in another Member State)?’ ments for the payment of unemployment benefit, namely capacity to work, willingness to work and readiness to work, and which is paid only if, having regard to the circumstances, it is likely that benefits will be granted under the statutory pension and accident insurance scheme, an unemployment benefit within the meaning of Article 4(1)(g) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to selfemployed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, or an invalidity benefit within the meaning of Article 4(1)(b) of that Regulation?
PETERSEN pogoji – če brezposelna oseba prebiva v tujini (v drugi državi članici)?“ manje nadomestila za brezposelnost – zmožnost za delo, razpoložljivost in pripravljenost delati – in ki se dodeli, če iz okoli�čin verjetno izhaja, da bo dajatev, izplačana na podlagi zakonskega pokojninskega in nezgodnega zavarovanja, dajatev za brezposelnost v smislu člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) �t. 1408/71 z dne 14. junija 1971 o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti, ali invalidska dajatev v smislu člena 4(1)(b) te uredbe?
The reference for a preliminary ruling was registered at the Court Registry on 9 May 2007.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe je bil v sodnem tajni�tvu Sodi�ča vpisan 9. maja 2007.
(2) If the answer to the first question is to the effect that the benefit referred to is an unemployment benefit within the meaning of Article 4(1)(g) of Regulation No 1408/71:
Če bi bilo treba na prvo vpra�anje odgovoriti, da je zadevna dajatev dajatev za brezposelnost v smislu člena 4(1)(g) Uredbe �t. 1408/71:
At the hearing, held on 3 April 2008, oral argument was presented by the legal representative of Mr Petersen and by the agents of the Austrian Government and the Commission.
Na obravnavi 3. aprila 2008, na kateri so podali ustne navedbe, so bili prisotni zastopnik J. Petersena ter zastopniki avstrijske vlade in Evropske komisije.
OPINION OF MR RUIZ-JARABO — CASE C-228/07
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI RUIZ-JARABOJA – ZADEVA C-228/07 vprašanj za predhodno
V — Analysis of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling
V – Analiza odločanje vani zadevi. J.
That requirement is satisfied in the case before the Court, where a worker has exercised the right of freedom of movement and relies on Article 39 EC to exercise his rights vis-à-vis a Member State.
Tako je v tem primeru, ko delavec uveljavlja pravico do prostega gibanja in se sklicuje na člen 39 ES, da bi uveljavil svoje pravice v državi članici.
The provisions on citizenship and their interpretation in caselaw
Pravila o državljanstvu in njihova razlaga v sodni praksi
There have recently been significant advances in the caselaw in this field.
Sodna praksa je na tem področju v zadnjem času zelo napredovala.
Since the judgment in Martínez Sala, 5 the concept of citizenship of the Union has gathered unprecedented momentum and taken its place at the forefront of the principal areas within the jurisdiction of the Court, which, following the introduction of Part Two of the EC Treaty in 1992, has been in a position to interpret the will of the legislature, affording individuals who exercise freedom of movement greater status than that attributed to economic operators.
Od sodbe Martínez Sala 5je evropsko državljanstvo doživelo izreden zagon in prevzelo vodstvo na prednostnih področjih v sodni praksi Sodi�ča, ki je od uvedbe drugega dela Pogodbe ES leta 1992 lahko razlagalo pripravljenost zakonodajalca, tako da je državljanu, ki se preseli, podelilo �ir�i status kot gospodarskemu subjektu 6.
6Slowly but surely, Community protection has been extended to individuals who did not traditionally fall within the scope of the Treaties, such
Varstvo Skupnosti se je počasi, a vztrajno raz�irilo na področja, ki so bila tradicionalno zunaj področja pogodb,
The questions referred concern the free movement of workers.
Postavljena vpra�anja se nana�ajo na prosto gibanje delavcev.
However, as is usual in this type of case, the dispute ultimately relates to citizens of the Union who exercise the right of freedom of movement.
Vendar razprava, kot je običajno v takih primerih, nazadnje zadeva evropske državljane, ki uveljavljajo pravico do prostega gibanja.
Thus, having introduced the concept of citizenship, the proceedings do not fall exclusively within the scope of Article 39 EC, since there are other provisions of the Treaty, specifically Articles 17 EC and 18 EC, whose subjectmatter has not yet been fully defined in the caselaw of the Court.
Ker je bil tako uveden pojem državljanstva, spor ne spada več izključno na področje člena 39 ES, saj obstajajo druge določbe Pogodbe, in sicer člena 17 ES in 18 ES, katerih vsebina �e ni bila v celoti opredeljena v sodni praksi Sodi�ča.
5 — Case C-85/96 [1998] ECR I-2691.
5 – Sodba z dne 12. maja 1998 (C-85/96, Recueil, str. I-2691).
6 — There is an interesting historical analysis of the negotiations which led to the inclusion of citizenship of the Union in the Treaty on European Union in O’Leary, S., The Evolving Concept of Community Citizenship.
6 – Zanimiva je zgodovinska analiza pogajanj, ki so se končala z vključitvijo evropskega državljanstva v Pogodbo o Evropski uniji: O’Leary, S., The Evolving Concept of Community Citizenship. From the Free Movement of Persons to Union Citizenship, Kluwer Law International, Haag, 1996, str. od 23 do 30.
Those who have participated in these preliminary ruling proceedings have asserted
Stranke v sodnem postopku so potrdile vlogo državljanstva iz Pogodbe ES v obravna-
PETERSEN nationals of third countries who are related to a citizen of the Union.
PETERSEN ljani tretjih držav, povezani z državljanom Unije 9.
9 To express it more europeus sum” and to invoke that status in order to oppose any violation of his fundamental rights’.
Sodi�če je model homo economicus, pravico lahko izjavi civis europeus sum, in če so kr�ene njegove temeljne pravice, ta status uveljavlja“ 12.
12 clearly, the Court has transformed the paradigm of homo economicus into that of homo civitatis. 10
ki ga je lahko izrazilo bolj shematično, spremenilo v model homo civitatis 10.
Although that Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs focuses on invoking the fundamental rights of the Union, in my view the Court has accepted its reasoning.
Čeprav se zgoraj navedeni sklepni predlogi generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa osredotočajo na sklicevanje na temeljne pravice Unije, je Sodi�če po mojem mnenju sprejelo njihovo dialektiko 13.
13 Cases such as Carpenter, 14 Baumbast and R, 15Bidar, 16Tas-Hagen and Tas 17and Morgan and Bucher 18demonstrate a
Zadeve, kot so Carpenter 14, Baumbast 15, Bidar 16, Tas-Hagen in Tas 17ali Morgan 18, dokazujejo
I have had the opportunity to express my views on the reasons for that step forward, which was taken, bravely but also wisely, in order to strengthen the personal situation of individuals, and which relegates to a secondary position the debate about barriers to entry and discrimination.
Imel sem priložnost izraziti mnenje o razlogih za utemeljitev tega razvoja, začetega s pogumom in tudi z razsodnostjo, da se okrepi individualni položaj posameznika, pri čemer je razprava o ovirah za vstop in o diskriminaciji ostala v ozadju 11.
11In short, as Advocate General Jacobs pointed out in Konstantinidis, ‘a Community national who goes to another Member State as a worker or selfemployed person … is entitled not just to pursue his trade or profession and to enjoy the same living and working conditions as nationals of the host State; he is in addition entitled to assume that, wherever he goes to earn his living in the European Community, he will be treated in accordance with a common code of fundamental values … In other words, he is entitled to say “civis tendency towards protecting individuals, a concern with the personal situation of those who exercise a right under the Treati- es which in the past was much less evident.
Skratka, kot je generalni pravobranilec Jacobs pojasnil v zadevi Konstantinidis, „državljan Skupnosti, kadar opravlja delo kot zaposlena ali samozaposlena oseba v drugi državi članici[, …] ni upravičen le do opravljanja svoje dejavnosti ali poklica ter enakih življenjskih in delovnih razmer, kot jih imajo državljani države gostiteljice, ampak poleg tega lahko tudi upravičeno domneva, da bo, če gre delat v Skupnost, obravnavan v skladu s splo�nimi temeljnimi vrednotami […] Povedano drugače, z vso skrb za varstvo posameznika in osebni pravni položaj osebe, ki uveljavlja pravico na podlagi pogodb, ki se je prej kazala le zadržano.
Thus, the free movement of persons acquires its own identity, imbued with an essential nature that is more constitutional than statu-
Tako je prosto gibanje oseb dobilo svojo identiteto, ki je prežeta z bolj ustavno kot zakonsko
12 — Opinion in Case C-168/91 Konstantinidis [1992] ECR I-1191, point 46.
12 – Točka 46 sklepnih predlogov z dne 9. decembra 1992 v zadevi Konstantinidis (sodba z dne 30. marca 1993, C-168/91, Recueil, str. I-1191).
10 — In Common Market Law Review, No 1, Vol. 45, 2008, pp. 2 and 3, the editors analyse the development of caselaw in this field and conclude that the differences between individuals who are economically active and those who are not, or between purely domestic and Community situations, together with the systematic aim of the principle of nondiscrimination in Article 12 EC, have become less marked.
13 – Sodi�če ni upo�tevalo posebnega predloga generalnega pravobranilca, ampak je nasprotno upo�tevalo filozofijo, na kateri je temeljil ta predlog, ker so bile ideje generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa v celoti vključene v sklepne predloge, ki jih je 12. septembra 2007 predstavil generalni pravobranilec Poiares Maduro v zadevi Centro Europa 7 (sodba z dne 31. januarja 2008, C-380/05, ZOdl., str. I-349, točke od 16 do 22).
The concept of citizenship, enshrined in Articles 17 EC and 18 EC, has gradually emerged as the new force behind integration.
11 – Sklepni predlogi v zadevah, v katerih sta bili izrečeni sodbi z dne 17. junija 1997 v zadevi Shingara in Radiom (C-65/95 in C-111/95, Recueil, str.
11 — Opinions in Joined Cases C-65/95 and C-111/95 Shingara and Radiom [1997] ECR I-3343, point 34, and Case C-386/02 Baldinger [2004] ECR I-8411, point 25.
I-3343, točka 34) in z dne 16. septembra 2004 v zadevi Baldinger (C-386/02, ZOdl., str. I-8411, točka 25).
See also points 56 to 74 of my Opinion in Case C-138/02 Collins [2004] ECR I-2703, and points 37 to 68 of my Opinion in Morgan and Bucher (cited in footnote 7).
Tudi točke od 56 do 74 mojih sklepnih predlogov v zadevi Collins (sodba z dne 23. marca 2004, C-138/02, Recueil, str. I-2703) ter od 37 do 68 sklepnih predlogov v zadevi Morgan in Bucher (sodba, navedena v opombi 7).
14 — Cited in footnote 9.15 — Cited in footnote 9.16 — Cited in footnote 7.17 — Cited in footnote 8.18 — Cited in footnote 7.
14 – Sodba, navedena v opombi 9.15 – Sodba, navedena v opombi 9.16 – Sodba, navedena v opombi 7.17 – Sodba, navedena v opombi 8.18 – Sodba, navedena v opombi 7.
OPINION OF MR RUIZ-JARABO — CASE C-228/07 tory, transforming it into a freedom akin to the dynamics of the fundamental rights.
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI RUIZ-JARABOJA – ZADEVA C-228/07 prvino in se spreminja v svobo�čino, prilagojeno dinamičnosti temeljnih pravic 19.
19 liable to unlimited taxation on income, provided that the property was situated on German territory.
odobreno osebam, ki so v celoti zavezane za plačilo dohodnine, pod pogojem, da je nepremičnina na nem�kem ozemlju.