natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In its original version, point 12 of Annex II to Directive 85/337 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, which refers to ‘modifications to development projects included in Annex I’, read in conjunction with point 7 of Annex I, which encompasses the ‘construction … of airports with a basic runway length of 2 100 m or more’, also
Določbe točke 12 priloge II v povezavi s točko 7 priloge I k Direktivi 85/337, v izvirni različici, ki se nana�a na presojo
Although an agreement signed between the public authority, a company in charge of the development and promotion of an airport and an air freight company which provides for certain modifications to the infrastructure of that airport in order to enable it to be used 24 hours per day and 365 days per year is not a project within the meaning of Directive 85/337 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, it is for the national court to determine, on the basis of the applicable national legislation, whether such an agreement constitutes a development consent within the meaning of Article 1(2) of that directive.
Če sporazum, sklenjen med javnim organom, družbo za pospe�evanje razvoja in promocijo letali�ča in družbo, ki se ukvarja z letalskim tovornim prometom, in je predvideval �tevilna gradbena dela za spremembo infrastrukture letali�ča Liège-Bierset, da bi se omogočila njegova uporaba 24 ur na dan, 365 dni na leto, ni projekt v smislu te direktive, mora predložitveno sodi�če na podlagi nacionalnega prava, ki se uporabi, ugotoviti, ali tak sporazum pomeni soglasje za izvedbo v smislu člena 1(2) Direktive 85/337.
It is necessary, in that context, to consider whether that consent forms part of a procedure carried out in several stages involving a principal decision and implementing decisions and whether account is to be taken of the cumulative effect of several projects whose impact
V tej zvezi je treba preizkusiti, ali je to soglasje za izvedbo del večfaznega postopka, v katerem se izdata osnovna in izvr�itvena
ABRAHAM AND OTHERS their extent, to fall outside the obligations resulting from Directive 85/337 and would, in that regard, thus deprive Annex II of that directive of all effect.
ABRAHAM IN DRUGI jajo iz Direktive 85/337, tako da bi bila njena priloga II popolnoma brez učinka.
(see paras 32, 33, 40, operative part 2) encompasses works to modify the infrastructure of an existing airport, without extension of the runway, where they may be regarded, in particular because of their nature, extent and characteristics, as a modification of the airport itself.
(Glej točke 32, 33, 40 in točko 2 izreka.) vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje in ki omenja „spremembe projektov, vključenih v prilogo I“, v povezavi s točko 7 priloge I, ki predvideva „gradnj[o] […] letali�č z vzletno stezo osnovne dolžine 2100 m ali več“, se nana�ajo tudi na spremembe infrastrukture obstoječega letali�ča brez podalj�anja vzletne in pristajalne steze, če se lahko zaradi narave, pomena in značilnosti �tejejo za spremembe samega letali�ča.
That is the case in particular for works aimed at significantly increasing the activity of the airport and air traffic.
To velja zlasti za dela, ki so namenjena temu, da se pomembno poveča obseg dejavnosti letali�ča in zračnega prometa.
It is for the national court to establish that the competent authorities correctly assessed whether the works at issue in the main proceedings were to be subject to an environmental impact assessment.
Predložitveno sodi�če mora zagotoviti, da so pristojni organi pravilno presodili, ali je bilo treba za dela, ki so sporna v postopku v glavni stvari, opraviti presojo vplivov na okolje.
As regards a project covered by point 12 of Annex II to Directive 85/337 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, the competent authorities have an obligation to take account of the projected increase in the activity of an airport in determining the environmental effect of modifications made to its infrastructure with a view to accommodating that increase in activity.
Pri projektu, na katerega se nana�a točka 12 priloge II k Direktivi 85/337, ki se nana�a na presojo vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje, morajo pristojni organi upo�tevati načrtovano povečanje obsega dejavnosti letali�ča, ko presojajo vpliv, ki ga imajo na okolje spremembe letali�ke infrastrukture, da se lahko dopusti povečanje obsega dejavnosti.
The scope of Directive 85/337 is wide and its purpose very broad.
Področje uporabe Direktive 85/337 je namreč obsežno, njen cilj pa zelo �irok.
It would be contrary to the very objective of that directive to exclude works to improve or extend the infrastructure of an existing airport from the scope of Annex II on the ground that Annex I of that directive covers the ‘construction of airports’ and not ‘airports’ as such.
Bilo pa bi v nasprotju s samim namenom te direktive, če bi bilo mogoče dela za izbolj�anje ali raz�iritev infrastrukture že zgrajenega letali�ča izmakniti področju uporabe priloge II te direktive z obrazložitvijo, da se njena priloga I nana�a na „gradnjo letali�č“ in ne na „letali�ča“ kot taka.
Such an interpretation would allow all works to modify a pre-existing airport, regardless of
Zaradi tovrstne razlage bi se namreč lahko vsa dela za spremembo že obstoječega letali�ča, ne glede na obseg teh del, izmaknila obveznostim, ki izha-
(see para. 46, operative part 3)
(Glej točko 46 in točko 3 izreka.)
Article 1 of the EIA directive defines the subjectmatter of the directive and some terms:
Člen 1 Direktive PVO opredeljuje njen predmet in nekatere pojme:
“project” means:
‚projekt‘ pomeni:
This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment 2in its original version (‘the EIA directive’).
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na Direktivo Sveta 85/337/EGS z dne 27. junija 1985 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje 2v njeni prvotni različici (v nadaljevanju: Direktiva PVO).
It relates to works at Liège-Bierset Airport which are alleged to have promoted its use for air freight services and to have caused an increase in night flights.
Gre za ukrepe na letali�ču Liège-Bierset, ki naj bi pospe�ili njegovo uporabo za letalski tovorni promet in povzročili povečanje �tevila nočnih letov.
The issue is essentially under what conditions modifications to the infrastructure of an airport require an environmental impact assessment, and in particular whether an intended increase in air traffic is to be taken into consideration.
V bistvu se zastavlja vpra�anje, pod kak�nimi pogoji je treba ob spremembah infrastrukture letali�ča opraviti presojo vplivov na okolje, zlasti, ali je treba ob tem upo�tevati zastavljeno povečanje letalskega prometa.
— the execution of construction works or of other installations or schemes,
izvedbo gradbenih ali drugih insta -lacijskih del ali projektov,
ABRAHAM AND OTHERS
ABRAHAM IN DRUGI
— other interventions in the natural surroundings and landscape including those involving the extraction of mineral resources; effects on the environment by virtue inter alia of their nature, size or location are made subject to an assessment with regard to their effects.
– druge posege v naravno okolje in krajino, vključno s tistimi, ki vključujejo izkori�čanje mineralnih virov; soglasja za izvedbo presodijo vplivi projektov, ki bodo, med drugim zaradi svoje narave, velikosti ali lokacije, verjetno pomembno vplivali na okolje.
“developer” means:
‚nosilec projekta‘ pomeni:
These projects are defined in Article 4.’ the applicant for authorisation for a private project or the public authority which initiates a project;
Ti projekti so opredeljeni v členu 4.“ prosilca za dovolitev zasebnega projekta, ali javni organ, ki da pobudo za projekt;
“development consent” means:
‚soglasje za izvedbo‘ pomeni:
‘The environmental impact assessment will identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner, in the light of each individual case and in accordance with the Articles 4 to 11, the direct and indirect effects of a project on the following factors: the decision of the competent authority or authorities which entitles the developer to proceed with the project.
„V presoji vplivov na okolje bodo glede vsakega posameznega primera in skladno s členi 4 do 11 na primeren način opredeljeni, opisani in ocenjeni neposredni in posredni vplivi posameznega projekta na naslednje dejavnike: odločitev pristojnega organa ali organov, ki dovoljuje nosilcu projekta izvedbo projekta.
— human beings, fauna and flora,
– ljudi, živalstvo in rastlinstvo,
— soil, water, air, climate and the landscape,
– tla, vodo, zrak, podnebje in krajino,
Article 2(1) defines the objective of the EIA directive:
Člen 2(1) določa cilj Direktive PVO:
— material assets and the cultural heritage.’
– lastnino in kulturno materialno dedi�čino.“
‘Construction of motorways, express roads … and lines for long-distance railway traffic and of airports (2) with a basic runway length of 2 100 m or more.
„Gradnja avtocest, hitrih cest [1] in daljinskih železni�kih prog ter letali�č 2z vzletno stezo osnovne dolžine 2100 m ali več.
Subject to Article 2(3), projects of the classes listed in Annex I shall be made subject to an assessment in accordance with Articles 5 to 10.
Ob upo�tevanju člena 2(3) so projekti skupin, na�tetih v Prilogi I, predmet presoje v skladu s členi 5 do 10.
Projects of the classes listed in Annex II shall be made subject to an assessment, in accordance with Articles 5 to 10, where Member States consider that their characteristics so require.
Projekti skupin, na�tetih v Prilogi II, se presodijo v skladu s členi 5 do 10, če države članice menijo, da njihove značilnosti tako zahtevajo.
Annex 14 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation contains standards for the whole area in which aircraft operate at an airport and when taking off and landing, that is to say for runways, taxiways and the air space at the airport.
Priloga 14 Čika�ke konvencije o mednarodnem civilnem letalstvu vsebuje standarde za celotno območje, v katerem se gibljejo letala na letali�ču ter ob vzletu in pristanku, to pomeni za vzletne in pristajalne steze, za kotalne steze in letali�ki zračni prostor.
It also governs signals for the use of the airport by aircraft.
Prav tako ureja signale za letala, ki uporabljajo letali�če.
Point 10(d) of Annex II mentions inter alia airfields:
Priloga II, točka 10(d), med drugim omenja manj�a letali�ča:
To this end Member States may inter alia specify certain types of projects as being subject to an assessment or may establish the criteria and/or thresholds necessary to determine which of the projects of the classes listed in Annex II are to be subject to an assessment in accordance with Articles 5 to 10.’
S tem namenom lahko države članice med drugim določijo posebne vrste projektov kot predmet presoje, oziroma lahko postavijo merila in/ali pragove, po katerih se določi, katere izmed projektov iz skupin, na�tetih v Prilogi II, se presoja skladno s členi 5 do 10.“
‘Construction of roads, harbours, including fishing harbours, and airfields (projects not listed in Annex I)’.
„Gradnja cest, pristani�č, vključno z ribi�kimi pristani�či in letali�č (projekti, ki niso vključeni v Prilogo I).“
Airports are listed in point 7 of Annex I:
Letali�ča so navedena v Prilogi I, točka 7:
Modifications to projects are covered by point 12 of Annex II:
Spremembe projektov vsebuje Priloga II, točka 12: značilnosti določenega projekta ali vrste projekta in za lastnosti okolja, na katere bo projekt verjetno vplival;
(b) the Member States consider that a developer may reasonably be required to compile this information having regard inter alia to current knowledge and methods of assessment.
(b) države članice menijo, da lahko od nosilca projekta upravičeno zahtevajo, da zbere te informacije, med drugim ob upo�tevanju tekočega poznavanja in metod presoje.
‘Modifications to development projects included in Annex I and projects in Annex I undertaken exclusively or mainly for the development and testing of new methods or products and not used for more than one year.’
„Spremembe projektov, vključenih v Prilogo I, in projektov iz Priloge I, ki se izvajajo izključno ali večinoma za razvijanje in preizku�anje novih metod ali izdelkov in ki niso v uporabi več kot eno leto.“
The information to be provided by the developer in accordance with paragraph 1 shall include at least:
Informacije, ki jih mora nosilec projekta zagotoviti skladno z odstavkom 1, vključujejo vsaj:
Article 5 specifies what information is to be supplied in connection with an environmental impact assessment:
Člen 5 določa, katere informacije je treba priskrbeti v okviru presoje vplivov na okolje:
— a description of the project comprising information on the site, design and size of the project;
– opis projekta, ki obsega informacije o lokaciji, zasnovi in velikosti projekta,
— the data required to identify and assess the main effects which the project is likely to have on the environment;
(a) države članice menijo, da so te informacije pomembne za dano stopnjo postopka izdaje soglasja in za specifične podatke za potrebe opredelitve in presojo glavnih verjetnih vplivov projekta na okolje,
— a non-technical summary of the information mentioned in indents 1 to 3.
– vanje, toplota, sevanje, itn.), izhajajočih iz obratovanja predlaganega projekta.
— an estimate, by type and quantity, of expected residues and emissions (water, air and soil pollution, noise, vibration, light, heat, radiation, etc.) resulting from the operation of the proposed project.
netehnični povzetek informacij, navedenih v alinejah 1 do 3.
The information referred to in Article 5(1) is specified in Annex III:
Priloga III natančneje opredeljuje informacije v skladu s členom 5(1):
A description (1) of the likely significant effects of the proposed project on the envi- ronment resulting from:
Opis 1verjetnih pomembnih vplivov predlaganega projekta na okolje, ki izhajajo iz:
— a description of the physical characteristics of the whole project and the land-use requirements during the construction and operational phases,
– obstoja projekta, opis fizičnih značilnosti celotnega projekta in zahtev glede rabe zemlji�ča med gradnjo in obratovanjem,
— the use of natural resources,
– rabe naravnih virov, opis glavnih značilnosti proizvodnih procesov, na primer lastnosti in količine uporabljenih materialov,
— a description of the main characteristics of the production processes, for instance, nature and quantity of the materials used,
– ocena vrste in količine pričakovanih ostankov in emisij (onesnaženje vode, zraka in tal, hrup, vibracije, osvetlje- emisije snovi, ki onesnažujejo, ustvarjanja motenj in odstranjevanja odpadkov,
ABRAHAM AND OTHERS and the description by the developer of the forecasting methods used to assess the effects on the environment.
ABRAHAM IN DRUGI in opis metod napovedovanja nosilca projekta, ki jih je uporabil za presojo vplivov na okolje.
regarding the contract concluded with Cargo Airlines Ltd (‘CAL’) on an unspecified date.
Sodi�ču glede prve pogodbe z družbo Cargo Airlines Ltd (v nadaljevanju: CAL), ki je bila sklenjena na nedoločen datum, niso bili posredovani drugi podatki.
However, the agreement entered into with the express courier company TNT on 26 February 1996 (‘the agreement’) is set out in detail.
Izčrpno pa je predstavljen sporazum z družbo za hitro dostavo TNT (v nadaljevanju: TNT) z dne 26. februarja 1996 (v nadaljevanju: sporazum).
) This description should cover the direct effects and any indirect, secondary, cumulative, short, medium and long-term, permanent and temporary, positive and negative effects of the project.’
1 – Ta opis bi moral zajemati neposredne vplive in vse posredne, sekundarne, kumulativne, kratko-, srednje- in dolgoročne, trajne in začasne, pozitivne in negativne vplive projekta.“
The parties who live near the airport submit that the agreement provided, inter alia, that:
Stanovalci, ki živijo v bližini letali�ča, navajajo, da ta sporazum med drugim predvideva naslednje:
According to the referring court, the directive was transposed largely verbatim into national law.
Predložitveno sodi�če navaja, da je bila Direktiva v pretežni meri dobesedno prenesena v zadevno nacionalno pravo.
— the entire length of the main runway (23L/05R) of the airport was to be fully operational and equipped with a landing system;
– glavna steza (23L/05R) letali�ča bo po vsej svoji dolžini popolnoma delovala in opremljena bo s pristajalnim sistemom;
III — Facts, procedure and questions referred for a preliminary ruling
III – Dejansko stanje, postopek in vprašanja za predhodno odločanje
— parallel runway (23R) was to be equipped by 1 March 1996 at the latest;
– vzporedna pristajalna steza (23R) bo opremljena najkasneje 1. marca 1996;
The main proceedings concern an action brought by individuals who live near Liège-Bierset Airport in Belgium.
Postopek v glavni stvari temelji na tožbi stanovalcev, ki živijo v bližini letali�ča Liège-Bierset v Belgiji.
For some time that airport has had a runway well over 2 100 metres in length.
To letali�če ima že dlje časa pristajalno stezo, ki je občutno dalj�a od 2100 metrov.
Following an economic study carried out by a third party, the Region of Wallonia decided to develop air freight activity at the airport which would take place 24 hours a day.
Région wallonne (v nadaljevanju: regija Valonija) se je po izdelavi gospodarskega izvedenskega mnenja odločila, da bo tam razvila dejavnost letalskega tovornega prevoza, ki se bo opravljala 24 ur na dan.
The Region of Wallonia and the Société de développement et de promotion de l’aéroport de Liège-Bierset (Liège-Bierset Airport Development and Promotion Company; ‘SAB’) entered into agreements with air freight undertakings.
Regija Valonija in Société de développement et de promotion de l’aéroport de Liège-Bierset (družba za razvoj in pospe�evanje steza 23ML bo opremljena z dvema dodatnima izvozoma za visoke hitrosti in stolp A. T. C. (Air Traffic Control Tower) bo prestavljen;
— a new apron of 18 hectares was to be sited directly opposite TNT’s main sorting centre;
– neposredno nasproti glavnega objekta TNT za razvr�čanje bo novo parkiri�če, v velikosti 18 ha;
The individuals who live nearby complain of very serious noise pollution, mostly at night, and of its effects on sleep and health.
Stanovalci, ki živijo v bližini letali�ča, se pritožujejo nad zelo močnim hrupom pretežno ponoči ter nad njegovimi vplivi na spanje in zdravje.
They have instituted civil proceedings, seeking compensation for the damage suffered by reason of the use of the infrastructure referred to in the agreement and a ban on the use of those infrastructure.
Z vidika civilne odgovornosti zahtevajo nadomestilo �kode – ki naj bi jo utrpeli zaradi uporabe infrastrukture, navedene v sporazumu z dne 26. februarja 1996 – in prepoved njene uporabe.
— the apron was to be extended towards the aircraft maintenance hangar and linked to the new high-speed exit;
– parkirno območje bo raz�irjeno v smeri hangarja za vzdrževanje letal in povezano z novim izvozom za visoke hitrosti;
— a control tower was to be erected, and a refuelling centre with a minimum capacity of one million litres was to be retained, with TNT having the option of requiring it to be enlarged;
– postavljen bo nadzorni stolp in na razpolago bo sredi�če za oskrbovanje z gorivom, z minimalno zmogljivostjo milijon litrov in z možnostjo TNT, da zahteva njegovo raz�iritev;
They argue that no environmental impact assessment was carried out prior to the grant of the planning consent and operational authorisation necessary for carrying out the works referred to in the agreement; as a result of the lack of impact assessment, the consents necessary for the implementation of the agreement and, therefore, also the infrastructure covered by those consents and the use thereof are unlawful.
Navajajo, da pred izdajo gradbenega dovoljenja in obratovalnega dovoljenja, ki sta potrebni za izvedbo del, navedenih v sporazumu z dne 26. februarja 1996, ni bila opravljena presoja vplivov na okolje. Neobstoj presoje vplivov na okolje naj bi pomenil, da dovoljenji, potrebni za izvedbo tega sporazuma, nista zakoniti, ter da zato prav tako ni zakonita tudi infrastruktura, navedena v teh dovoljenjih, in njena uporaba.
— the airport was to be open 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, and an appropriate power source was to be available for TNT’s operations (approximately 2 000 amperes) with a back-up system enabling an uninterrupted supply of energy to be maintained, which required permission to be granted for the construction of two 15 kV high-tension electricity substations.
– letali�če bo odprto 24 ur na dan 365 dni v letu in na razpolago bo ustrezen vir električne energije za dejavnost TNT (približno 2000 amperov), z dodatno rezervo za zagotovitev neprekinjene oskrbe z energijo, za kar bo potrebna odobritev dveh visokonapetostnih električnih transformatorjev 15 kV.
The Cour d’appel stated inter alia that the EIA directive contemplates and defines the notion of an airport by reference to the length of its runway and not by reference to the installations connected with the runway, such as hangars or a control tower.
Cour d’appel je med drugim navedlo, da Direktiva PVO zadeva in opredeljuje pojem letali�ča glede na dolžino njegove vzletne steze ter ne glede na objekte poleg vzletne steze, kot so hangarji ali nadzorni stolp.
However, the runway was not substantially modified.
Vzletna steza pa naj ne bi bila
The first night flights were carried out in 1996 by CAL.
Prve nočne lete je leta 1996 opravila družba CAL.
TNT began its own night flights in March 1998.
Družba TNT je začela z nočnimi leti marca 1998.
ABRAHAM AND OTHERS ment by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997?
ABRAHAM IN DRUGI
‘construction’ of an airport and Annex II applies to modifications to a project included in Annex I, that is to say modifications to the construction.
bistveno spremenjena. Poleg tega Priloga I k Direktivi zadeva „gradnjo“ letali�ča, Priloga II pa se nana�a na spremembo projekta iz Priloge I, to pomeni na spremembo gradnje.
In the appeal to the Cour de cassation (Court of Cassation), the individuals who live nearby challenge the interpretation by the Cour d’appel of the notion of a ‘project’.
Stanovalci, ki živijo v bližini letali�ča, s pritožbo izpodbijajo stali�če Cour d’appel glede razlage pojma projekta.
The Cour de cassation has therefore referred the following questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
Cour de Cassation je zato prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo ta vpra�anja:
(3) Since a projected increase in the activity of an airport is not directly referred to in the annexes to Directive 85/337, must the Member State in question nevertheless take account of that increase when examining the potential environmental effect of modifications made to the infrastructure of that airport with a view to accommodating that increase in activity?’
Ali mora država članica, čeprav načrtovano povečanje dejavnosti letali�ča ni neposredno predvideno v prilogah k Direktivi 85/337, to povečanje kljub temu upo�tevati, ko presoja mogoče vplive sprememb, ki se nana�ajo na infrastrukturo tega letali�ča, na okolje, da bi se lahko tako povečanje dejavnosti začelo opravljati?“