natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The EU’s EUROPA website contains links to these national websites.
Spletno mesto EU EUROPA vsebuje povezave do teh nacionalnih spletnih strani.
Finally, we reformed the rules on agricultural state aids.
Nazadnje, spremenili smo pravila o kmetijskih državnih pomočeh.
As a "common" policy, the CAP still takes a large slice of the EU budget, even though that slice is shrinking year by year.
SKP kot „skupna“ politika še vedno prejme velik delež proračuna EU, čeprav se ta delež iz leta v leto zmanjšuje.
Therefore, all the more, we must never slacken our efforts to make sure that every cent of the CAP budget is spent on its intended purpose.
Zato še toliko bolj ne smemo popustiti pri prizadevanjih, da vsak cent proračuna SKP porabimo za tisto, za kar je namenjen.
For this reason, under the Barroso Commission, the use of sound principles in managing the CAP was underpinned by financial rigour.
Zato je med mandatom Barrosove Komisije finančna disciplina podpirala uporabo dobrih načel pri vodenju SKP.
European farming receives financial support mainly from the EU budget – but also, on occasion, from national and regional governments.
Evropsko kmetijstvo prejema podporo večinoma iz proračuna EU – vendar občasno tudi od nacionalnih in regionalnih vlad.
It is essential work to make sure that such state aids follow rules, for the sake of a level playing field.
Bistvenega pomena je zagotoviti, da take državne pomoči upoštevajo pravila, da se zagotovijo enakovredni pogoji.
State aids must also make a good fit with the EU’s policies on agriculture and rural development, as well as with international trade rules.
Državne pomoči se morajo tudi dobro skladati s politiko EU za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter s pravili mednarodne trgovine.
The state aid reform will help to ensure this.
Reforma državnih pomoči bo to pomagala zagotoviti.
Every year, the European Court of Auditors checks to what extent money from the EU budget has been spent correctly.
Evropsko računsko sodišče vsako leto preverja, do kakšnega obsega so bila sredstva iz proračuna EU pravilno porabljena.
As anyone would expect, the bar is set very high: for any area of policy, the Court gives a “positive statement” only if 98 per cent of spending is error-free.
Kot je mogoče pričakovati, so merila zelo stroga: ne glede na področje politike Sodišče izda „pozitivno mnenje“ samo, če je bilo vsaj 98 odstotkov sredstev porabljenih brez napak.
On my watch, we raised the share of spending on agriculture which cleared this bar.
V času mojega mandata smo dvignili delež izdatkov za kmetijstvo, ki je to merilo tudi dosegel.
For budget year 2007, the Court issued a positive statement with regard to all spending on “agriculture” (in other words, direct income support payments to EU farmers, and use of market instruments).
Za proračunsko leto 2007 je Sodišče izdalo pozitivno mnenje v zvezi z vsemi izdatki za „kmetijstvo“ (z drugimi besedami, neposrednimi izplačili dohodkovne podpore kmetom v EU in uporabo tržnih instrumentov).
The overall error rate for spending on “agriculture” and rural development is now close to 2 per cent.
Skupna raven napak pri izdatkih za „kmetijstvo“ in razvoj podeželja je zdaj približno dva odstotka.
S i m p l i c at i on payments to farmers if they fail to observe certain standards of environmental care, animal welfare and public health.
Poenostavitev dohodkovne podpore kmetom, če ne upoštevajo nekaterih okoljevarstvenih standardov, standardov dobrega počutja živali in standardov javnega zdravja.
For example, we have taken out of the system various rules which have little or nothing to do with farming.
Na primer, izključili smo sistem različnih pravil, ki so le malo povezana s kmetijstvom ali pa sploh niso.
To feed the EU’s 500 million people, provide other vital raw materials and look after rural areas, the CAP needs systems and rules.
SKP potrebuje sisteme in pravila, da nahrani 500 milijonov ljudi v EU, zagotovi pomembne druge surovine in skrbi za podeželska območja.
However, we must keep these systems and rules as useful and simple as possible – and this has been a high priority for me.
Vendar pa moramo te sisteme in pravila ohraniti čim bolj uporabne in preproste – in to je bila zame zelo pomembna prednostna naloga.
Many of the reforms of recent years have brought greater simplicity by their very nature (for example, the decoupling of income support to farmers).
Veliko reform iz zadnjih let je že samih po sebi prineslo večjo preprostost (na primer ločevanje dohodkovne podpore za kmete).
In addition, a number of projects have aimed specically at simplication.
Poleg tega pa so se na poenostavitev osredotočili številni projekti.
A vivid example of other action taken on simplication relates to fruit and vegetables.
Dober primer drugih ukrepov za poenostavljanje je povezan s sadjem in zelenjavo.
Until July 2009, 36 types of fruit and vegetable were regulated by specic “marketing standards”.
Do julija 2009 so 36 vrst sadja in zelenjave urejali posebni „tržni standardi“.
This meant that, famously, a cucumber could not be sold if it was too “curvy” – and good food never made it to the supermarket shelves.
To je pomenilo, kar je slaven primer, da kumarice ni bilo mogoče prodajati, če je bila preveč ukrivljena – in dobra hrana ni nikoli prišla na police nakupovalnih središč.
In 2007 the Commission carried out a huge simplication of agricultural policy legislation by merging 21 sets of market rules for dierent agricultural products into just one set - a “single common market organisation”.
Komisija je leta 2007 izvedla veliko poenostavitev zakonodaje o kmetijski politiki, tako da je združila 21 zbirk tržnih pravil za različne kmetijske proizvode v eno samo zbirko –„enotno skupno tržno ureditev“.
This slashed the number of related legal articles by about three-quarters.
To je število povezanih pravnih členov zmanjšalo za približno tri četrtine.
It made policy on agricultural markets much clearer – and thus took an important step towards making that policy more coherent.
Politiko o kmetijskih trgih je naredilo veliko bolj jasno – in tako naredilo velik korak proti večji skladnosti te politike.
The EU also continued its work on simplifying crosscompliance - the system which cuts income support
EU je nadaljevala tudi delo za poenostavljanje navzkrižne skladnosti – sistem, ki ukine izplačilo
The Commission abolished marketing standards for 26 types of fruit and vegetable, so that industry now decides what standards to apply.
Komisija je razveljavila tržne standarde za 26 vrst sadja in zelenjave, tako da se industrija zdaj sama odloča, katere standarde bo uporabila.
Useful EU-wide standards remain in place for the remaining 10 types, but even specimens which do not meet these standards can be sold if distinguished by appropriate labelling.
Za preostalih 10 vrst še ostajajo veljavni standardi, ki veljajo po vsej EU, vendar se lahko prodajajo tudi primerki, ki ne ustrezajo tem standardom, če so označeni z ustrezno oznako.
This means that rules will not keep perfectly edible, tasty food out of our shops simply because it has a somewhat individual shape.
To pomeni, da pravila ne bodo več preprečevala okusni, za prehrano primerni hrani, da bi se pojavila na policah, samo zato, ker ima malo posebno obliko.
Part 3: Making EU policy a force for good in a globalised world
3. del: Oblikovanje politike EU v silo za doseganje dobrega v globaliziranem svetu
The EU does not exist or operate in a vacuum.
EU ne obstaja ali deluje v praznem prostoru.
Neither does its farm sector: it is connected to the rest of the global economy by a vast network of fine threads.
Enako velja za njen kmetijski sektor: s preostankom svetovnega gospodarstva je povezan s široko mrežo tankih niti.
The EU typically exports agri-food products worth some € 70 billion a year and is becoming a net exporter in this sector.
EU običajno na leto izvozi agroživilske proizvode v vrednosti 70 milijard EUR in postaja neto izvoznica v tem sektorju.
Since the EU is specialising more and more in high-value finished products rather than bulk commodities, this success is not putting pressure on agricultural producers in the developing world.
Ker se EU čedalje bolj specializira za končne izdelke z visoko vrednostjo in ne na velike količine blaga, ta uspeh ne pritiska na kmetijske pridelovalce v razvijajočem se svetu.
In any case, the EU imports more agricultural goods from developing countries than do the US, Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand together.
EU poleg tega uvozi več kmetijskih izdelkov iz držav v razvoju kot ZDA, Kanada, Japonska, Avstralija in Nova Zelandija skupaj.
Because of these strong trade links, the structure of the CAP has implications for the wider world – as do the agricultural policies of other industrialised countries.
Zaradi teh močnih trgovskih povezav je struktura SKP pomembna za širši svet – enako kot so kmetijske politike drugih industrijskih držav.
These facts received a growing share of public attention from the end of 2007 onwards, when sharply rising food prices threatened health and social stability in many of the world’s poorer countries.
Od konca leta 2007 se je zanimanje javnosti za ta dejstva povečevalo, ko so strmo naraščajoče se cene hrane ogrozile zdravje in družbeno stabilnost v številnih revnejših državah sveta.
Under the Barroso Commission, the need for responsibility towards the wider world when making and using agricultural and rural policy consistently moulded the EU’s approach to trade negotiations – multilateral and bilateral – as well as to broader international issues.
Med mandatom Barrosove Komisije je potreba po odgovornosti do širšega sveta pri sprejemanju in uporabi kmetijske in podeželske politike dosledno oblikovala pristop EU k trgovinskim pogajanjem – večstranskim in dvostranskim – ter k širšim mednarodnim vprašanjem.
Multilateral trade
Večstranska trgovina
International trade must work to rules.
Mednarodna trgovina mora potekati po pravilih.
Over the last five years, the EU has worked tirelessly in the Doha Round of trade talks conducted within the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to improve the rules under which trade takes place – for the benefit of both the EU and the world's poorer countries.
EU je v zadnjih petih letih neumorno sodelovala v krogu trgovinskih pogajanj iz Dohe, ki so znotraj Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) potekala za izboljšanje pravil, v skladu s katerimi poteka trgovina – v korist EU in revnejših držav sveta.
has been widely hailed as very ambitious and forwardthinking, though respectful towards the EU's own interests.
element splošno pozdravljen kot zelo ambiciozen in napreden element, ki še vedno spoštuje lastne interese EU.
It includes deep cuts to the limits on the types of domestic subsidy which distort trade (essentially, those which are linked in some way to production).
Vključuje močno zmanjšanje omejitev vrst domačih subvencij, ki izkrivljajo trgovino (v bistvu tiste, ki so na nek način povezane s proizvodnjo).
It includes import tariff reductions which would hand valuable new opportunities to our trade partners without crushing the EU's farm sector.
Vključuje zmanjšanje uvoznih tarif, ki bi našim trgovinskim partnerjem dale nove dragocene priložnosti, pri tem pa ne bi uničile kmetijskega sektorja v EU.
Very significantly, it includes plans to phase out agricultural export subsidies – a market tool which has been highly controversial over the decades.
Zelo pomembno je, da vključuje načrte za postopno ukinitev kmetijskih izvoznih subvencij – to tržno orodje je bilo v zadnjih desetletjih nadvse sporno.
This is the boulder which has not yet reached the top of the hill – but we have rolled it much, much closer to the summit, especially with regard to agricultural trade.
Tu še nismo dosegli našega cilja – čeprav smo napravili velik napredek in smo danes dosti bližje temu cilju, še posebej v zvezi s kmetijsko trgovino.
When ministers last met to discuss the Doha Round, it was estimated that around 90 per cent of the important issues in the talks had been solved.
Ko so se ministri nazadnje srečali, da bi razpravljali o krogu pogajanj iz Dohe, je bilo ocenjeno, da je bilo na pogajanjih rešenih približno 90 odstotkov pomembnih vprašanj.
Within the overall liberalisation "offer" which the EU has made in the Doha Round, the agricultural element
Znotraj skupne liberalizacijske „ponudbe“, ki jo je EU dala med krogom pogajanj iz Dohe, je bil kmetijski
Therefore, over the last few years, the EU has been seen as a deal-making rather than deal-breaking party in the Doha Round.
Zato je EU v zadnjih letih v krogu pogajanj iz Dohe delovala kot stranka, ki sklepa posle, in ne kot stranka, ki jih razdira.
This marks a sharp contrast with past perceptions; and the EU intends this shift to be permanent.
V primerjavi s preteklim vedenjem je to velika sprememba, in EU namerava to spremembo ohraniti.
Bilateral/regional trade
Dvostranska/regionalna trgovina tudi kmetijsko blago.
A sound multilateral framework is at the centre of the EU's trade strategy. Nevertheless, bilateral arrangements have their place as supplements to this.
(To se bo od januarja 2010 uporabljalo za izvoženi riž, od oktobra 2009 pa pod nekaterimi pogoji za izvoženi sladkor.)
agricultural goods.
Dober večstranski okvir je v središču trgovinske strategije EU.
(This will apply to rice exports from January 2010, and to sugar exports from October 2009 with certain conditions.)
Kljub temu pa je prostor za dvostranske sporazume kot njegova dopolnila.
Under the Barroso Commission, the EU invested a great deal of time in strengthening its ties with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries.
EU je med mandatom Barrosove Komisije veliko časa namenila krepitvi vezi z afriškimi, karibskimi in pacifiškimi državami (AKP).
As a result, the level of market access offered by the EU to ACP countries is coming close to the high level offered to the world's Least Developed Countries through the Everything But Arms agreement.
Zaradi tega se raven dostopnosti do trga, ki jo EU zagotavlja državam AKP, približuje visoki ravni, ki je s sporazumom „vse razen orožja“ zagotovljena najmanj razvitim državam sveta.
Outside the group of ACP countries, the EU struck preliminary agreements on agricultural trade with Egypt and Israel, and made very good progress towards an accord with Morocco.
Zunaj skupine držav AKP je EU sklenila predhodne sporazume o kmetijski trgovini z Egiptom in Izraelom ter dosegla velik napredek pri iskanju soglasja z Marokom.
When confirmed, these agreements will free up trade substantially, to the clear benefit of all parties.
Ko bodo ti sporazumi potrjeni, bodo znatno sprostili trgovino, kar bo jasno koristilo vsem stranem.
Preferential trade terms between the EU and ACP states were previously enshrined in the Cotonou Agreement – which had stimulated trade to the point where the EU typically took nearly 60 per cent of ACP countries' total agricultural exports (including processed products).
Preferencialni trgovinski pogoji med EU in državami AKP so bili prej navedeni v Cotonoujskem sporazumu – ti pogoji so spodbujali trgovino do te mere, da je EU običajno uvozila skoraj 60 odstotkov skupnega kmetijskega izvoza držav AKP (vključno s predelanimi proizvodi).
However, from 1 January 2008, all parties had to apply general WTO rules, which do not allow unilateral preferences.
Vendar pa morajo vse strani od 1. januarja 2008 uporabljati pravila STO, ki ne dovoljujejo enostranskih preferenc.
The EU made good progress in setting up Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with ACP countries, as replacements for the previous arrangements.
EU je dosegla velik napredek pri vzpostavljanju sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu (EPS) z državami AKP, ki nadomeščajo prejšnje sporazume.
These agreements offer duty-free and quota-free access to the EU market for exports from ACP states, including
Ti sporazumi zagotavljajo dostop brez carin in kvot do trga EU za blago, izvoženo iz držav AKP, kar vključuje
The EU also launched negotiations for trade agreements with Korea, India and ASEAN.
EU je začela tudi pogajanja o trgovinskih sporazumih s Korejo, Indijo in Združenjem držav jugovzhodne Azije (ASEAN).
We have almost finalised a deal with Korea which would eliminate duties on most of the EU's significant agricultural exports to this market – notably pork, cheese, wine and whisky.
S Korejo smo skoraj dosegli dogovor, ki bi ukinil dajatve na večino pomembnejšega kmetijskega blaga, ki se iz EU izvaža na ta trg – predvsem svinjino, sir, vino in viski.
Helping the world to feed itself
Pomoč svetu pri zagotavljanju hrane
Outside trade discussions as well as inside them, the EU has been a leading player in the search for international solutions to the international problem of hunger.
EU je bila glavna akterka pri iskanju mednarodnih rešitev za mednarodno težavo lakote tako znotraj trgovskih razprav kot zunaj njih.
Part of the solution is domestic.
Del rešitve leži doma.
The world's food needs are growing, and EU farmers must be free to produce more in response.
Svetovne potrebe po hrani rastejo in kmetov v EU se ne sme omejevati pri pridelovanju več hrane.
This is why, within the CAP, we have been removing obstacles to higher production.
Zaradi tega smo v okviru SKP odstranili ovire za večjo proizvodnjo.
In other words, to a large extent, hunger in the developing world can be rolled back by solutions in the developing world - with our support.
Kljub temu pa skrbi glede globalne oskrbe s hrano ne bodo odpravljene, če se EU odvrne od visokokakovostne proizvodnje in obrne k proizvodnji „velike količine za vsako ceno“.
This was our clear policy under the Barroso Commission.
Premik osredotočenosti na kakovost je izjemno ugodno vplival na kmetijsko-živilski sektor v EU, in tako bo tudi v prihodnosti.
The EU has been taking firmer action to stimulate long-term agricultural production in developing countries - by opening our markets and by giving agriculture a larger portion of funding in our development programmes.
Proizvodnja visoke kakovosti v EU dopolnjuje blagovno proizvodnjo v državah v razvoju z učinkovito razdelitvijo dela.
We took a highly practical step at the end of 2008.
Na koncu leta 2008 smo naredili nadvse praktičen korak.
In response to an idea which I floated in the first half of that year, the EU agreed to make available a so-called "food facility" worth € 1 billion over three years.
EU se je odzvala na idejo, ki sem jo podala v prvi polovici istega leta, in se strinjala, da bo dala na razpolago tako imenovani „instrument za hrano“, vreden 1 milijardo EUR za obdobje treh let.
This food facility has given a much-needed boost to agricultural production in poorer countries, for example by helping farmers to access fertiliser and seed.
Ta instrument za hrano je dal nadvse potreben zagon kmetijski proizvodnji v revnejših državah, na primer tako, da je kmetom pomagal priti do gnojil in semen.
It has also funded safety net systems to provide for the basic food needs of vulnerable people in these countries, including children.
Financiral je tudi sisteme varnostnih mrež za zadovoljitev osnovnih potreb ranljivih ljudi v teh državah po hrani, vključno z otroki.
Highquality output in the EU complements commodity production in developing countries, in an efficient division of labour.
Z drugimi besedami, precej lakote v državah v razvoju je mogoče odpraviti - z našo podporo - z rešitvami v
Nevertheless, all of these developments have laid a road down which we will travel further in the coming years.
Vendar pa so vsi ti dogodki tlakovali pot, po kateri bomo nadaljevali v prihodnjih letih.
I hope this brochure conveys at least some impression of why I have found my work as a European Commissioner so exciting over the last five years - and so deeply satisfying.
Upam, da ta brošura vsaj delno predstavlja, zakaj se mi je v zadnjih petih letih delo evropske komisarke zdelo tako zanimivo – in zakaj mi je prineslo toliko zadovoljstva.
The CAP has been constantly evolving and renewing itself ever since it came into being.
SKP se je vse od svojega nastanka nenehno razvijala in obnavljala.
And this process of renewal has accelerated powerfully in recent years.
Ta postopek obnove se je v zadnjih letih močno pospešil.
First, the CAP has a remarkable capacity for change.
Prvič, SKP ima izjemno sposobnost spreminjanja.
In particular, the EU's farming community – in which I am proud to have been raised – is prepared to adapt and modernise its ways, when the need is explained clearly and when sufficient time is allowed for adjustment.
Še posebno kmečka skupnost v EU – za katero sem ponosna, da sem v njej odraščala – se je pripravljena prilagajati in posodobiti, če je potreba po tem jasno razložena in če je za prilagajanje na voljo dovolj časa.
The CAP is helping to forge a closer relationship between farmer and consumer, giving the one a much greater freedom to respond accurately and competitively to the needs of the other.
SKP pomaga graditi tesnejši odnos med kmetom in potrošnikom, tako da prvemu daje veliko večjo svobodo, da se pravilno in konkurenčno odziva na potrebe drugega.
It is also offering farming a marketfriendly safety net that is part of the EU's insurance policy against food supply problems at a time of acute anxiety about this issue.
Kmetijstvu tudi ponuja do trga prijazno varnostno mrežo, ki je del zaščitne politike EU zoper težave pri oskrbi s hrano, in to v času močne zaskrbljenosti glede tega vprašanja.
On the other hand, the CAP is not moving forward under the banner of agricultural production alone.
Po drugi strani SKP ne napreduje samo skupaj s kmetijsko proizvodnjo.
We have made this "green" EU policy – the policy of our very earth - greener than ever before, investing heavily in the future health of our countryside and environment.
Spremenili smo jo v „zeleno“ politiko EU – politiko naše zemlje –, bolj zeleno kot kadar koli prej, saj veliko vlagamo v prihodnje zdravje našega podeželja in okolja.
Secondly, the CAP as a tool draws enormous strength and value from being a common policy.
Drugič, SKP kot orodje črpa ogromno moč in vrednost iz tega, da je skupna politika.
Certainly, this strength must be flexible strength.
Vsekakor mora ta moč ostati prilagodljiva.
One size cannot t all, and this is why many aspects of the CAP give a great deal of breathing-room for individuality – rural development policy in particular.
Enak pristop za vse ne more zadoščati, in ravno zato številni vidiki SKP puščajo veliko manevrskega prostora za individualnost – to še zlasti velja za politiko razvoja podeželja.
Nevertheless, the more I have talked to farmers, politicians, environmentalists, consumers and scientists across the EU, the more I see that effective policy needs unity among the diversity.
Več ko sem se pogovarjala s kmeti, politiki, okoljevarstveniki, potrošniki in znanstveniki iz vse EU, bolj verjamem, da učinkovita politika potrebuje enotnost v raznolikosti.
If we allowed the CAP to shatter into a myriad of competing national and regional policies, I firmly believe that the benefits of the money spent would likewise shatter into so many untidy fragments.
Trdno sem prepričana, da če bi dovolili, da se SKP razdrobi v nešteto konkurenčnih nacionalnih in regionalnih politik, bi se koristi od porabljenega denarja prav tako sesule v mnoge neurejene koščke.
We have strengthened the foundations of our financial management, at a time when the CAP is taking a smaller share of the EU budget.
V času, ko SKP zavzema manjši delež proračuna EU, smo okrepili temelje našega finančnega vodenja.
We have thrown open the curtains to let the public see what their money is buying.
Odstrli smo zastor, da lahko javnost vidi, za kaj se njen denar porabi.
We have slashed red tape. And we have made the EU an even more responsible and helpful player on the international stage with regard to agricultural trade and food security.This has not always been an easy journey - and at the time of writing, we are still working to help the dairy sector through a very difficult period.
Zmanjšali smo birokracijo in EU kot akterko na mednarodnem odru naredili še bolj odgovorno in pripravljeno pomagati v zvezi s kmetijsko trgovino in varnostjo hrane.