natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A traditional term is deemed traditional in the official language of one Member State if it has been used in that official language and in a specified border region of the neighbouring Member State(s) for wines elaborated under the same conditions provided that such a term fulfils the criteria in points (a) to (d) in one of these Member States and both Member States mutually agree to define, use and protect such a term.
Tradicionalni izraz se �teje za tradicionalnega v uradnem jeziku države članice, če se je uporabljal v tem uradnem jeziku in v določeni mejni regiji sosednje oziroma sosednjih držav članic, za vina izdelana v enakih pogojih in pod pogojem, da izraz zadostuje merilom v točkah od (a) do (d) v eni od teh držav članic in da se obe državi članici medsebojno dogovorita o določanju, uporabi in za�čiti tega izraza.
To qualify for inclusion in Annex III(A), a traditional term must:
Za vnos v Prilogo III(A) mora biti tradicionalni izraz:
(a) be specific in itself and precisely defined in the Member State’s legislation;
(a) sam po sebi specifičen in natančno opredeljen v zakonodaji države članice;
Member States shall notify to the Commission:
Države članice Komisiji sporočijo:
(b) be sufficiently distinctive and/or enjoy an established reputation on the Community market;
(b) dovolj svojstven in/ali uveljavljen na trgu Skupnosti;
(c) have been traditionally used for at least 10 years in the Member State in question;
(c) v tradicionalni uporabi vsaj deset let v zadevni državi članici;
(a) the facts justifying recognition of each term;
(a) obrazložitev za priznanje tradicionalnega izraza;
(b) the traditional terms included in their legislation that meet the above requirements and the wines for which they are reserved;
(b) tradicionalne izraze, dovoljene z njihovo zakonodajo, ki izpolnjujejo zgoraj navedene pogoje, in vina, za katera so pridržani;
A — Facts of the case
III – Dejansko stanje, postopek v glavni stvari, vprašanja za predhodno odločanje in postopek pred Sodiščem
— for Italy, in Italian, the term ‘Riserva’,
Pristojni deželni urad zvezne dežele za Španijo v �panskem jeziku izraza „Gran Reserva“ in „Reserva“;
SCHNEIDER regional authority in Rheinland-Pfalz on 20 November 2002, the following objections were raised against the proposed labelling of those wines, in so far as they are relevant to this reference for a preliminary ruling: The main labels bore the name of the vineyard and below, according to the price range of the wine, the particulars ‘Grande Réserve’ or ‘Réserve’.
Porenje-Pfalz je glede nameravanega označevanja teh vin, kolikor je to upo�tevno za ta postopek za sprejetje predhodne odločbe, je pri pregledu 20. novembra 2002 ugotovil: glavne etikete so nosile ime vinogradni�kega posestva in pod tem, med drugim, označbi „Grande Réserve“ oziroma „Réserve“ glede na cenovni razred vina.
It was intended to state the quality category of the wines, the region of production (‘Pfalz’) and the official inspection and bottling number on the label on the back.
Na etiketi na hrbtni strani naj bi bili navedeni podatek o kakovostni stopnji vina, pridelovalno območje („Pfalz“) ter uradna kontrolna �tevilka in �tevilka polnitve.
own and in conjunction with his company name.
tudi, naj se ugotovi, da je uporaba nem�kih izrazov, tako samostojno kot tudi v povezavi z njegovo firmo, dopustna. Verwaltungsgericht Neustadt je 29. januarja 2004 to tožbo na prvi stopnji zavrnilo. H. S.
Mr Schneider brought an appeal against that judgment before the Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz (Higher Administrative Court, Rheinland-Pfalz).
Schneider je zoper zavrnilno sodbo vložil pritožbo pri Oberverwaltungsgericht Rheinland-Pfalz (vi�je upravno sodi�če Porenje-Pfalz).
That court dismissed his appeal by judgment of 21 September 2004.
To je pritožbo zavrnilo s sodbo z dne 21. septembra 2004.
In the view of both administrative courts, the contested designations constituted inadmissible imitations or evocations of the protected traditional Spanish, Italian and Portuguese terms ‘(Gran) Reserva’, ‘(Gran) Riserva’ and ‘(Grande) Réserve’.
Obe upravni sodi�či menita, da sporni označbi pomenita nedopustno ponarejanje oziroma namigovanje na za�čitene tradicionalne �panske, italijanske in portugalske izraze „(Gran) Reserva“ oziroma „(Gran) Riserva“ oziroma „(Grande) Réserve“.
On 19 December 2002 the Aufsichts- und Dienstleistungsdirektion (ADD) Trier of the Land of Rheinland-Pfalz took a decision inter alia to prohibit the use of the French terms ‘Réserve’ and ‘Grande Réserve’ as misleading.
Aufsichts- und Dienstleistungsdirektion Trier des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz (v nadaljevanju: ADD) je 19. decembra 2002 z odločbo, med drugim, prepovedala uporabo francoskih izrazov „Réserve“ oziroma „Grande Réserve“ kot zavajajoča.
In the appeal he relies on the following grounds which are relevant from the point of view of Community law: The applicable legislation on wine designations protects the traditional terms referred to in point 18 of this Opinion only in the respective Spanish, Portuguese or Italian national languages but not in any other language.
V reviziji je navedel sledeče revizijske graje, ki so upo�tevni z vidika prava Skupnosti: veljavni predpisi o označevanju vin naj bi �čitili tradicionalne izraze, navedene v točki 18, zgolj v �panskem, portugalskem oziroma v italijanskem jeziku, ne pa v katerem drugem jeziku.
The same also applies to the corresponding designation in the Greek language and Greek alphabet.
Enako naj bi veljalo za ustrezno označbo v gr�kem jeziku in gr�ki abecedi.
The use of comparable designations for wines from another Member State is therefore neither an imitation nor an evocation.
Uporaba primerljivih označb za vina iz druge države članice torej ne pomeni ponarejanja ali namigovanja.
During the proceedings before the German administrative courts, the expression ‘Consulat des Weins — Réserve/Grande Réserve’ was also registered as a Community trade mark by OHIM.
Med postopkom pred nem�kimi upravnimi sodi�či je bil izraz „Consulat des Weins – Réserve/Grande Réserve“ pri UUNT registriran kot znamka Skupnosti.
Such a prohibitive effect applying to all designations which are substantively covered by the situations regulated by Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002 would run counter to the purpose of the new legislation on wine designations, which is to permit the use of optional particulars outside the area covered if possible.
753/2002, bi bil v nasprotju z zastavljenim ciljem novih predpisov o označevanju, v skladu s katerimi se po možnosti dovoli uporaba neobveznih navedb zunaj reguliranega področja.
B — Proceedings before the referring court and questions referred
B – Postopek pred predložitvenim sodiščem in vprašanja za predhodno odločanje
In the view of the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, however, the use of the abovementioned traditional terms is not permitted where it misleads the public or infringes protected designations.
Vendar je po mnenju BVerwG uporaba navedenih tradicionalnih izrazov kljub temu nedopustna, če je zavajajoča ali če posega v za�čitene označbe.
The other traditional designations protected under Article 24(2) in conjunction with Annex III of Regulation No 753/2002 exist only in Spanish, Greek, Italian, Portuguese and now German, but not in French.
Dodatni tradicionalni izrazi, ki so za�čiteni v skladu s členom 24(2) v povezavi s Prilogo III Uredbe �t. 753/2002, obstajajo sicer zgolj v �panskem, gr�kem, italijanskem, portugalskem in zdaj v nem�kem jeziku, ne pa v francoskem jeziku.
Relying on the fifth indent of point B(1)(b) of Annex VII to Regulation No 1493/1999, the Bundesverwaltungsgericht takes the view that the designations ‘Réserve’ and ‘Grande Réserve’ and ‘Reserve’ and ‘PrivatReserve’ are essentially other traditional terms and are intended to refer to a particular quality of the wine based on the production or ageing method.
BVerwG s sklicevanjem na Prilogo VII(B)(1)(b), peta alinea, Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 izhaja iz tega, da naj bi bili označbi „Réserve“ in „Grande Réserve“ oziroma „Reserve“ in „Privat-Reserve“ v bistvu dodatna tradicionalna izraza in naj bi kazali na posebno kakovost vina na podlagi proizvodnje, priprave ali staranja.
However, they cannot be used in Germany as other traditional terms within the meaning of that provision because they have not been defined by German national legislation in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002.
V Nemčiji pa naj jih ne bi bilo mogoče uporabljati kot dodatna tradicionalna izraza v smislu te določbe, saj naj ne bi bila opredeljena v nacionalnih nem�kih predpisih v skladu s členom 23 Uredbe �t. 753/2002.
Nevertheless, the Bundesverwaltungsgericht considers that prohibited imitation or evocation under Article 24(2) of Regulation No 753/2002 can also exist where the protected term is used in a language other than the protected original language.
Vendar BVerwG meni, da lahko ponarejanje ali namigovanje, ki sta prepovedani na podlagi člena 24(2) Uredbe �t. 753/2002, obstajata tudi pri uporabi za�čitenih izrazov v drugem jeziku kot v za�čitenem izvirnem jeziku.
The prohibition on misuse is taken to mean the use of the protected term itself, whilst the prohibition on imitation bans the use of similar terms and the prohibition on evocation the use of terms which are similar in meaning.
Prepoved prilastitve meri namreč na uporabo za�čitenega izraza, prepoved ponarejanja pa prepoveduje uporabo izrazov, ki vsebujejo podobne besede, ter prepoved namigovanja na uporabo izrazov s podobnimi pomeni.
However, in the view of the Bundesverwaltungsgericht, this protection of other traditional designations against misuse, imitation or evocation applies only to wines from the same Member State as the protected traditional term, that is to say in the present case only to Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Greek and Austrian wines, but not to wines from German regions.
Vendar po mnenju BVerwG obstaja ta za�čita dodatnih tradicionalnih izrazov pred prilastitvijo, ponarejanjem in namigovanjem le pri vinih, ki izvirajo iz iste države članice kot za�čiten tradicionalni izraz, torej v tej zadevi le pri �panskih, portugalskih, italijanskih, gr�kih in avstrijskih vinih, ne pa pri vinih z nem�kih pridelovalnih območij.
This follows from the specific relationship between the traditional term and the winemaking tradition of the respective Member State and the freedom of Member States to regulate their respective sectors.
To naj bi izhajalo že iz posebne povezave med tradicionalnim izrazom in vinogradni�ko tradicijo posamezne države članice ter avtonomije držav članic pri urejanju tega področja.
The contrary view would prevent the development of optional wine designations since recognition of a traditional term from one Member State would block the use and thus the development of a comparable term in another Member State.
Nasprotna razlaga bi vodila do togosti neobveznih označb vina, ker bi se potem s priznavanjem tradicionalnega izraza iz ene države članice preprečila uporaba in s tem nastanek podobnega izraza v drugi državi članici.
(2) Is Article 24(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 to be interpreted as meaning that imitation or evocation exists only if it is in the same language as that of the protected traditional term?
Ali je treba člen 24(2)(a) Uredbe (ES) �t. 753/2002 razlagati tako, da gre za protipravno ponarejanje ali namigovanje samo takrat, ko pride do njega v istem jeziku, v katerem je za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz?
(3) Is Article 24(2) of Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 to be interpreted as meaning that the traditional terms listed in Annex III are protected only with regard to wines from the same producer Member State as the protected traditional term?’
Ali je treba člen 24(2) Uredbe (ES) �t. 753/2002 razlagati tako, da so tradicionalni izrazi, navedeni v Prilogi III, za�čiteni samo pri vinih, ki izvirajo iz iste države članice proizvajalke kot za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz?
C — Proceedings before the Court of Justice
Ali je treba člen 47(2)(b) in (c) v povezavi s točko B(1)(b), peta alinea, točka 3, Priloge VII k Uredbi (ES) �t.
In addition to the parties in the main action, the Hellenic Republic, Italy and Spain
Postopka so se poleg strank v postopku v glavni stvari udeležile Helenska republika,
Spain took part only in the oral procedure.
Uporaba teh izrazov naj v Nemčiji ne bi bila zakonsko urejena in bi se ti po presoji polnilca zato lahko uporabili.
but also as an ‘other particular’ in accordance with point B(3) of Annex VII to Regulation No 1493/1999.
Italija in Španija. Italija je predložila le pisno stali�če in se ni udeležila ustne obravnave.
The use of the terms is not regulated by law in Germany and the terms may therefore be used at the discretion of the bottler.
Španija se je v tej zadevi udeležila le ustne obravnave.
At the hearing on 13 September 2007 the parties in the main action, the Hellenic Republic, Spain and the Commission presented oral submissions and answered questions asked by the Court of Justice.
Na obravnavi 13. septembra 2007 so stranki v postopku v glavni stvari, Helenska republika, Španija in Komisija podale ustne navedbe in odgovorile na vpra�anja Sodi�ča.
IV — Submissions of the parties
IV – Trditve strank
The Italian Government also takes the view that a particular which refers to the
Italijanska vlada prav tako zastopa stali�če, da se sme navedba, ki se nana�a na
In support of that view, the Italian Government relies on Article 6(1) of Regulation No 753/2002, under which the use of ‘other particulars’ is possible provided that no risk of confusion is created, particularly with regard to regulated optional particulars.
Italijanska vlada se za obrazložitev tega stali�ča sklicuje na člen 6(1) Uredbe �t. 753/2002, v skladu s katerim naj bi bila mogoča uporaba „drugih navedb“, če ni nevarnosti zavajanja, zlasti v zvezi z reguliranimi neobveznimi navedbami.
The Spanish Government points out that the traditional terms ‘Reserva’ and ‘Gran Reserva’ are used in Spain for an ageing method for red, white and rosé wines and are generally known to consumers.
Španska vlada opozarja na to, da se tradicionalna izraza „Reserva“ in „Gran Reserva“ v Španiji uporabljata za postopek staranja rdečega in belega vina ter rozeja in naj bi bila potro�nikom splo�no znana.
In Germany, however, there is no production or ageing method for wine that can be linked with terms such as ‘Réserve’ and ‘Grande Réserve’.
Vendar v Nemčiji ne obstaja postopek proizvodnje, priprave ali staranja vina, ki bi bil lahko povezan z izrazoma, kot sta „Réserve“ in „Grande Réserve“.
For that reason those two terms are fanciful terms in Germany, but imitate traditional terms from other Member States and may mislead consumers.
Tako naj bi bila ta izraza v Nemčiji domi�ljijska izraza, ki posnemata tradicionalne izraze drugih držav članic in bi lahko zavajala potro�nike.
Therefore the two terms ‘Réserve’ and ‘Grande Réserve’ can only be regulated optional particulars.
Iz tega razloga bi lahko pri obeh izrazih „Réserve“ in „Grande Réserve“ �lo le za regulirano neobvezno navedbo.
However, such particulars have no express legal basis in the basic regulation in relation to German wines and are not permitted.
Ta izraza pa naj za nem�ka vina ne bi imela nobene izrecne pravne podlage v temeljni uredbi in naj bi bila nedopustna.
The Commission takes the view that designations may be used in principle as ‘other particulars’ within the meaning of Article 47(2)(c) and point B(3) of Annex VII of Regulation No 1493/1999, even where they refer to the situations addressed in Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002 (production or ageing method, quality, colour or type of wine, place or particular event linked to the history of the wine concerned).
Komisija meni, da bi se označbe načelno lahko uporabile tudi takrat kot „druge navedbe“ v smislu člena 47(2)(c) in točke B(3) Priloge VII k Uredbi �t. 1493/1999, če bi se nana�ale na dejanska stanja, navedena v členu 23 Uredbe �t.
Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002 does not have any prohibitive effect in respect of the use of ‘other particulars’ within the meaning of point B(3) of Annex VII to Regulation
753/2002 (postopek proizvodnje, priprave ali staranja, kakovost, barva ali vrsta vina, kraj ali posebni dogodek, povezan z zgodovino vina). Člen 23 Uredbe �t.
The Hellenic Government takes the view that only wines included in the exhaustive list of traditional particulars in Annex III to Regulation No 753/2002 are protected.
Helenska vlada meni, da so za�čitena le vina, ki so taksativno na�teta na seznamu tradicionalnih navedb v Prilogi III k Uredbi �t. 753/2002.
Furthermore, it follows from Article 6(2) of Regulation No 753/2002 that use as an ‘other particular’ may be permitted in principle.
Poleg tega naj bi načelna dopustnost uporabe kot „druge navedbe“ izhajala že iz člena 6(2) Uredbe �t. 753/2002.
to be interpreted as meaning that imitation or evocation exists only if it is in the same language as that of the protected traditional term.
tako, da gre za protipravno ponarejanje ali namigovanje le takrat, ko do njega pride v istem jeziku, v katerem je za�čiteni tradicionalni izraz.
This is clear from the precise indication of the language in question in the list contained in the Annex to Regulation No 753/2002.
To naj bi izhajalo že iz natančnih navedb v posameznih jezikih na seznamu priloge k Uredbi �t. 753/2002.
That interpretation is also based on the fact that there is no risk of misleading consumers, which is necessary for unlawful imitation or evocation, where the term is used in another language.
Ta razlaga naj bi izhajala tudi iz tega, ker naj pri uporabi izraza v drugem jeziku ne bi obstajala nevarnost zavajanja, ki se zahteva za obstoj protipravnega ponarejanja ali namigovanja.
The Commission makes the further argument that the situations covered by Article 23 of Regulation No 753/2002 are so broad that there is not really any scope remaining for the ‘other particulars’ under point B(3) if a prohibitive effect is assumed.
Komisija kot dodatne argumente navaja, da naj bi bila dejanska stanja, ki jih zajema člen 23 Uredbe �t. 753/2002, tako �iroka, da bi ob domnevi prepovedi ostalo komaj �e kak�no področje uporabe za „druge navedbe“ v skladu s točko B(3).
Furthermore, the development of new ‘other traditional terms’ is possible only where they can be listed as ‘other particulars’ prior to their registration.
Poleg tega bi bil nastanek novih „dodatnih tradicionalnih izrazov“ mogoč, le če bi se ti lahko pred registracijo uporabljali kot „druge navedbe“.
The Land Rheinland-Pfalz did not make any remarks on the second question in its written observations.
Zvezna dežela Porenje-Pfalz se glede drugega vpra�anja za predhodno odločanje v svojih pisnih stali�čih ni izrazila.
At the hearing Rhein-land-Pfalz supported the submissions on the second question made by Italy, Greece and the Commission.
Na obravnavi pa se je v zvezi z drugim vpra�anjem za predhodno odločanje pridružila stali�ču Italije, Grčije in Komisije.
The Land takes the view that a limited prohibition on translations would be inconsistent with the protection of traditional terms found in other languages, the aims of the internal market and consumer protection.
Zastopa mnenje, da bi bila omejena prepoved prevajanja v nasprotju z za�čito tradicionalnih izrazov, ki obstajajo v drugih jezikih, ter s cilji notranjega trga in varstvom potro�nikov.
B — The second question
B – Drugo vprašanje za predhodno odločanje
In the view of the Italian Government, the protection of regulated traditional terms against misuse, imitation or evocation cannot depend on the language used.
Po mnenju italijanske vlade je za�čita reguliranih tradicionalnih izrazov pred prilastitvijo, ponarejanjem ali namigovanjem nujno neodvisna od uporabljenega jezika.
Evocation exists wherever the translation is likely to create a link with the traditional term in the mind of consumers; that is the case here because of the similarity between the terms of Latin origin which are used.
Za namigovanje gre vedno takrat, kadar bi lahko prevod pri potro�niku ustvaril prepričanje o povezavi s tradicionalnim izrazom v za�čitenem jeziku; to naj bi bilo v tej zadevi zaradi podobnosti uporabljenih izrazov latinskega izvora.
In the view of the Hellenic Government too, the use of a protected term is prohibited in any language.
Tudi po mnenju gr�ke vlade je uporaba za�čitenih izrazov prepovedana v vsakem jeziku.
The Hellenic Government believes that an average European consumer is familiar with most particulars listed in Annex III to Regulation No 753/2002 irrespective of the language used and links those particulars with the quality of the wine.
Povprečni evropski potro�nik naj bi po mnenju gr�ke vlade poznal večino navedb iz Priloge III k Uredbi �t. 753/2002 ne glede na jezik in bi povezoval te navedbe s kakovostjo vina.
Those particulars and terms indicated on the label are the information which is relevant in deciding on the purchase of wine.
Te navedbe in izrazi na nalepki naj bi bile informacije, ki so pomembne pri odločitvi za nakup vina.
C — The third question
881/98 ne bi spremenil.
The Spanish Government argues that from a linguistic point of view the word ‘Réserve’ is a translation of the Spanish term ‘reserva’.
Španska vlada navaja, da je jezikovno gledano beseda „Réserve“ prevod �panskega izraza „reserva“.
Such a translation is prohibited under Article 48 of Regulation No 1493/1999.
Tak prevod naj bi bil v skladu s členom 48 Uredbe �t. 1493/1999 prepovedan.
The use of traditional terms in the language for which they have been registered is unlawful imitation or evocation, but translations constitute wrongful appropriation.
Pri uporabi tradicionalnih izrazov v jeziku, za katerega so bili registrirani, naj bi �lo za protipravno ponarejanje ali namigovanje, pri prevodu pa za protipravno prilastitev.
However, that holds only for unlawful misuse, as is shown by Article 48 of Regulation No 1443/1999: That article expressly
C – Tretje vprašanje za predhodno odločanje
This is because the origin of wine has a very particular importance in the eyes of consumers.
To sledi iz tega, da ima izvor vina v očeh potro�nikov poseben pomen.
The term ‘Réserve’ is widely used in practice by Member States (e.g. France) and third countries and has not been penalised
Sicer člen 24(4), drugi pododstavek, določa, da za�čita tradicionalnega izraza velja samo za jezik, v katerem je naveden v Prilogi III. Toda
OPINION OF MS TRSTENJAK — CASE C-285/06 the present case, for example, the protection of the traditional terms ‘Reserva’ for Spain, ‘Riserva’ for Italy, ‘Reserve’ for Greece, ‘Reserva’ for Portugal and ‘Reserve’ for Austria is reserved solely for wines from the countries concerned which are eligible for protection; they may therefore on no account be used to label wines from Germany.
Tako naj bi bila na primer v tej zadevi za�čita tradicionalnih izrazov „Reserva“ za Španijo, „Riserva“ za Italijo, „Reserve“ za Grčijo, „Reserva“ za Portugalsko in „Reserve“ za Avstrijo pridržana izključno vinom, ki izvirajo iz zadevnih držav in so upravičena do za�čite – zato naj jih ne bi bilo mogoče v nobenem primeru uporabiti za označevanje vin iz Nemčije.
thus far as unlawful evocation. Only this narrow interpretation of the scope of the protection for that term is consistent with the fact that different national criteria have been authorised in parallel for the protected Spanish, Portuguese and Italian terms and no unlawful imitation has been taken to exist among the terms.
izraza naj bi bila v skladu z dejstvom, da so bila za za�čitene �panske, portugalske in italijanske izraze dopu�čena različna nacionalna merila drug poleg drugega in med izrazi niti ni protipravnega ponarejanja. Tako kot pri navedbah k drugemu vpra�anju za predhodno odločanje tudi v zvezi s tretjim vpra�anjem za predhodno odločanje H. S.
However, a risk of confusion with Spanish, Portuguese and other wines in respect of which the terms in question are protected does not exist in particular where the (German) region is also indicated.
Če je hkrati navedeno (nem�ko) pridelovalno območje, pa tveganje zamenjave s �panskimi, portugalskimi in drugimi vini, za katera so bili posamezni izrazi za�čiteni, ravno ne obstaja.