natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Marine biodiversity – The EU should continue to work with its partners from the Convention on Biological Diversity to create protected marine areas in the high seas. This implies working at UNCLOS level to obtain an international agreement on the sustainable exploitation of marine biodiversity in international waters.
Delo – V okviru Mednarodne organizacije dela mora EU sodelovati pri spodbujanju dostojnih pogojev za delo v zelo globaliziranih sektorjih prometa, ladjedelništva in ribištva, da bi zagotovili socialno pravičnost in lojalno konkurenco med svetovnimi akterji.
CO2 storage. The EU must therefore work for the conclusion of a post-2012 agreement on climate change, in collaboration
Podnebne spremembe – Oceani, morja in obale zaznavajo posledice spreminjanja podnebja. Vendar so to tudi območja, ki lahko pripomorejo k boju proti tem spremembam, zlasti
International representation with its partners from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Znanstvene raziskave – EU mora ohraniti znanstveno sodelovanje s svojimi mednarodnimi partnerji za nadaljevanje obširnih raziskovalnih programov, namenjenih proučevanju odprtega in globokega morja.
CO2 emissions from ships.
Podpreti mora tudi pogajanja, ki potekajo v okviru Mednaro- dne pomorske organizacije (IMO) za omejitev izpustov CO2pri ladjah.
The EU also must continue to help the developing countries adapt to climate change.
In nazadnje, EU mora državam v razvoju še naprej
If the EU is to be in a position to develop the integrated approach in international bodies, it has to enhance its role and presence in such fora.
Da bi EU lahko razvila celosten pristop v okviru teh mednarodnih organov, mora v njih okrepiti svojo vlogo in navzočnost.
When EU representation as such is not possible, coordinated or even common positions should be adopted in keeping with the duty of loyal cooperation.
Če zastopanje EU kot tako ni mogoče, je treba v skladu z obveznostjo lojalnega sodelovanja nujno sprejeti usklajena ali celo skupna stališča.
Regional strategy: better governance in the Mediterranean la ge ul
Regionalna strategija: boljše gospodarjenje v Sredozemlju la ge ul
© Lionel F emissions from shore and from vessels, a general degradation of the coastal environment and significant biodiversity loss.
© Lionel F na sredozemski ekosistem, ki je prizadet zaradi izpustov onesnaževal z obale in ladij, splošnega propadanja obalnega okolja in velikega zmanjšanja biotske raznovrstnosti.
The Mediterranean region is also defined as a sensitive zone in terms of climate change because it is threatened by floods, coastal erosion and soil deterioration.
Poleg tega sredozemska regija z vidika podnebnih sprememb velja za občutljivo območje, saj jo ogrožajo poplave, obalna erozija in degradacija tal.
The deployment of an integrated maritime policy in the Mediterranean has to tackle two major obstacles: the European Union is present in only seven Mediterranean States and a large part of the waters of the Mediterranean is governed by rules for the high seas.
Uvedba celostne pomorske politike v Sredozemlju mora premagati dve veliki oviri: Evropska unija vključuje samo sedem sredozemskih držav in za največji del sredozemskih voda velja ureditev odprtega morja.
The solution will consequently require new governance initiatives.
Rešitev je torej mogoče doseči samo znovimi pobudami na področju gospodarjenja z morji.
Yet human activity could draw far greater economic benefits from this sea with a greatly reduced impact on its ecosystem.
Vendar bi lahko človeška dejavnost od tega morja imela večje gospodarske koristi s precej manjšimi posledicami za ekosistem.
It is therefore urgent to tackle these problems within the context of an integrated maritime policy.
Nujno je torej, da se s temi težavami spopademo v okviru celostne pomorske politike.
Two obstacles stand in the way.
Vendar se pojavljata dve oviri.
First, only seven Mediterranean States are EU members, while the other 12 countries apply different maritime (and sectoral) policies.
Prvič, Evropska unija vključuje samo 7 sredozemskih držav, v drugih 12 pa se uporabljajo drugačne pomorske (in sektorske) politike.
Second, the large proportion of the Mediterranean waters is governed by rules for the high seas and is outside the regulatory reach of coastal States.
Drugič, za največji del sredozemskih voda velja ureditev odprtega morja, za katero se ne uporablja zakonodaja obalnih držav.
An integrated maritime policy therefore can only be established through governance initiatives.
Celostna pomorska politika se bo torej lahko uveljavila samo s pobudami na področju gospodarjenja z morjem.
Last September, the European Commission presented the new regional maritime strategy for the Mediterranean.
Evropska komisija je septembra lani predstavila novoregionalno pomorsko strategijo za Sredozemlje.
The Mediterranean has serious problems to address in a complex political context.
Sredozemlje se mora spopasti z velikimi težavami, intov zapletenih političnih okoliščinah.
The Commission proposes ways towards improved maritime governance and greater involvement of coastal States in the management of marine areas.
Komisija predlaga načine za izboljšanje gospodarjenja z morjem in večje vključevanje obalnih držav v upravljanje morskega okolja.
First of all, this means working with Member States to develop cross-cutting governance tools, the only way to implement an integrated policy, and then drawing the attention of other coastal States to their advantages.
Najprej tako, da se z državami članicami razvijejo medsektorska orodja za gospodarjenje z morjem, ki so edini način za uporabo celostne politike, nato pa se o njihovih prednostih poučijo druge obalne države.
This could include, for example: maritime spatial planning, which will be the subject of a pilot project to encourage cross-border planning, integrated coastal zone management, for which best practices will be placed online, or the integration of research efforts and integrated maritime surveillance. The latter is being addressed in a pilot project involving six coastal States (see p. 6).
To vključuje na primer pomorsko prostorsko načrtovanje, ki bo predmet pilotnega projekta, namenjenega spodbujanju čezmejnega prostorskega načrtovanja, ali celostno upravljanje obalnih območij, v zvezi s katerim bodo najboljše prakse objavljene na spletu, pa tudi povezovanje raziskovalnih prizadevanj in celostni pomorski nadzor, ki bo predmet pilotnega projekta med šestimi obalnimi državami (glej str. 6).
The integrated maritime policy has to be grounded in principles that are applicable everywhere, but must also be able to adapt to specific regional situations.
Celostna pomorska politika mora temeljiti na načelih, ki se lahko uporabljajo povsod, vendar se mora znati prilagoditi tudi regionalnim posebnostim.
Regional sea basins differ widely from one another, not only in terms of physical factors but also in socio-economic terms.
Regionalni morski bazeni so si med seboj zelo različni, ne samo glede na fizične, ampak tudi družbenogospodarske dejavnike.
Arctic Ocean(1), the Baltic Sea (2) and, the latest to date, the Mediterranean(3). (3).
Komisija je doslej oblikovala regionalne pomorske strategije za Arktični ocean(1), Baltsko morje (2) in kot zadnjo po vrsti za Sredozemlje(3). (3).
The European Commission proposes, for example, to encourage private and public maritime stakeholders to cooperate more closely at the level of the Mediterranean basin as a whole, or to help interested non-EU States to develop an integrated approach.
Namen druge osi ukrepov je izboljšati pomorsko sodelovanje med obalnimi državami, predvsem vključiti to sodelovanje v okvir celovitega pristopa.
It also plans to set up a Mediterranean working group on integrated maritime policy to promote dialogue and cooperation with non-EU Mediterranean coastal States.
Evropska komisija v ta namen, na primer, predlaga spodbujanje zasebnih in javnih pomorskih akterjev k večjemu medsebojnemu sodelovanju na ravni celotnega sredozemskega bazena ali nudenje pomoči državam članicam, ki državam nečlanicam pomagajo pri razvoju celostnega pristopa.
‘The challenges affecting the Mediterranean Sea call for shared and, above all, integrated responses, rooted in improved maritime governance’, concludes the Commission’s Communication.
Načrtuje tudi ustanovitev sredozemske delovne skupine o celostni pomorski politiki, ki bo spodbujala dialog in sodelovanje s tretjimi državami v sredozemski regiji.
A semi-enclosed sea with tremendous potential, the Mediterranean is the victim of unbalanced and non-sustainable development.
Sredozemlje je kot polzaprto morje z zelo velikimi možnostmi danes zaznava posledice neuravnoteženega in netrajnostnega razvoja.
In volume, it bears nearly 30% of global maritime trade.
Glede na količino v Sredozemlju poteka skoraj 30 % svetovne čezmorske trgovine.
Around 20% of containers and 30% of seaborne oil traffic transit through the Mediterranean.
Prečka ga približno 20% zabojnikov in 30 % nafte, ki se prevažajo z ladjami.
Nearly half the EU’s fishing fleet operates in this sea.
Skoraj polovica ribiškega ladjevja EU tam izvaja svoje dejavnosti.
Its coastal areas are home to more than 150 million inhabitants, a figure that doubles during tourist season.
Na njegovih obalah živi več kot 150 milijonov prebivalcev, med turistično sezono pa se ta številka podvoji.
These activities are neither controlled nor coordinated.
Te slabo vodene in neusklajene dejavnosti imajo škodljive učinke
They have a detrimental impact on the Mediterranean ecosystem, which suffers from polluting
„Izzivov v Sredozemlju se je treba lotiti v skupnem sodelovanju in predvsem celovito, podlaga za to pa je izboljšanje gospodarjenja z morjem,“ ugotavlja Komisija na koncu sporočila.
The Treaty of Lisbon expands significantly the European Parliament’s powers in the field of fisheries.
Z Lizbonsko pogodbo se bodo pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta na ribiškem področju precej povečale.
With the exception of certain matters such as the setting of TACs and quotas, decisions in many areas will now have to be approved by Members of the EP.
Z izjemo nekaterih zadev, kot je določitev TAC in kvot, bodo morali številna področja odločanja potrditi evroposlanci.
The mandate of the EP’s Committee on Fisheries is therefore appreciably strengthened.
Pristojnosti Odbora Evropskega parlamenta za ribištvo sebodo torej znatno povečale.
Carmen Fraga Estévez (European People’s Party) is the new Chairwoman of the European Parliament’s Committee on Fisheries.
Carmen Fraga Estévez (Evropska ljudska stranka) jenova predsednica Odbora Evropskega parlamenta zaribištvo.
This 45-member committee reviews fisheries issues before they are presented to the EP as a whole. Mrs Fraga Estévez is in her second term ofoffice as committee chair.
Ta odbor združuje 45 evroposlancev in jeodgovoren za obravnavo zadev v zvezi z ribištvom, preden se predložijo vsem poslancem.
Most of the committee members are neophytes both in Parliament and with respect to the Common Fisheries Policy.
Odboru predseduje že drugič, večina njegovih članov pa je novih tako na področju skupne ribiške politike kot v Parlamentu. Intervju.
This is not true, however, as demonstrated by numerous plans.
To vprašanje bo mogoče rešiti z novo skupno ribiško politiko, ki upošteva ekosistemski pristop, največji trajnostni donos itd.
What’s more, the Commission has not analysed alternative fishing activity.
Vendar na kratki rok ostajajo nerešene številne težave z načrti za upravljanje.
With the new Common Fisheries Policy, which takes account of the ecosystem approach, maximum sustainable yield, and so on, this question can be settled.
Pogosteje kot predloge Evropske komisije odobrimo predloge regionalnih svetovalnih svetov.
For the short term, however, many problems with the management plans need to be addressed.
Obstaja še ena pomembna težava, zaradi katere so načrti za upravljanje neuspešni: ni dovolj samo zmanjšati skupni dovoljeni ulov (TAC) in ribolovni napor, ampak je treba proučiti posamezna ribolovna območja.
We approve proposals presented by Regional Advisory Councils more often than those presented by the European Commission.
Ne za vsak stalež, ampak za celotno posamezno ribolovno območje, saj je večina ribolovnih območij Evropske unije mešanih ali mnogovrstnih.
There has to be an analysis of each fishery, not of each stock, but of each fishery taken as a whole since most European Union fisheries are mixed or multispecies.
To je edini resen pristop, s katerim se lahko izognemo celo zavržkom… o pi r v
That’s the only serious approach, and it will even make it possible to avoid discards… e in E is her i es and a qu ac ul t ur F
Ev o v in ri bo go js to v i št ib R
• What do you see as the priorities for the next five years?CFE: The first important point is the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
• Katere so za vas prednostne naloge v prihodnjih petih letih?CFE: Prva pomembna stvar je začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe.
The remit of the Fisheries Committee will be considerably strengthened.
Pristojnosti Odbora za ribištvo se bodo znatno povečale.
We are moving from virtually 0% to nearly 100% codecision, with the exception of TACs (1) and quotas and fisheries agreements, for which we have the possibility to issue assent, however.
Tako rekoč z 0-odstotnega soodločanja prehajamo na 100-odstotno soodločanje, z izjemo TAC (1) ter kvot in ribolovnih sporazumov, pri katerih imamo kljub temu možnost privolitve.
In other words, our‘yes’ or ‘no’ is binding on the Council.
Povedano drugače, naše strinjanje ali nestrinjanje bo za Svet zavezujoče.
Consequently, we will have to exercise these powers in the most appropriate way.
Zato bomo morali te pristojnosti izvajati kar najustrezneje. Za to bo potrebno veliko dela, časa in znanstvenega dela.
That will take a lot of work, a lot of time and a lot of scientific study, but we are ready to take up this challenge and we think we are equal to it.
Vendar smo se pripravljeni spoprijeti s tem izzivom in menimo, da smo tega sposobni.
• And with regard to the Council?
• In kar zadeva Svet?
How do you see your collaboration?CFE: I don’t know.
Kako vidite sodelovanje?CFE: Ne vem.
We will start dealing with the Council only within the framework of the codecision procedure.
S Svetom bomo začeli razpravljati šele v okviru soodločanja.
I think that closer relations are possible for some questions but not for others.
Menim, da je sporazum mogoč pri nekaterih vprašanjih, ne pa pri drugih.
For the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, I believe that we have a greater chance to form a common front with the European Commission than with the Council.
Pri reformi skupne ribiške politike imamo po mojem mnenju več možnosti za združitev sil z Evropsko komisijo kot s Svetom.
But I don’t really know yet.
Vendar o tem še nič ne vem.
We will see whether relations with the Council are good or bad starting next year, with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Ali bo odnos s Svetom dober ali slab, bomo lahko videli po začetku prihodnjega leta, ko bo začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba.
• What are the points of friction and the points of convergence with the European Commission?CFE: With regard to the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, we are going to have more problems with the Council than with the European Commission, in my opinion.
• Ali bi se lahko Odbor Evropskega parlamenta za ribištvo razvil v komisijo za pomorske zadeve?CFE: To smo zahtevali ob zadnjem sklicu zakonodajnega organa.
The Commission is perfectly aware of the problems and solutions, of the limited choices available, and I think that it is on the right track and that it has already made a major effort by doing some soul-searching in the Green Paper(2).
Zahtevamo, da se nam dodeli vsaj usklajevanje pomorske politike, vzporedno s tem, s čimer se trenutno ukvarja komisar za po morske zadeve in ribištvo. To vprašanje je še vedno odprto.
The problems to come in the short term, I think, will concern management plans more than anything else.
Menim, da Evropski parlament čaka na začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, preden bo prilagodil pristojnosti različnih odborov.
First, because the European Commission does not take account of the socio-economic consequences or the repercussions of these plans and second because it works from a very simplistic principle, namely that when there is less fishing, prices increase.
Ne vem, ali bomo dobili te večje pristojnosti, saj se zanje poteguje tudi odbor za promet.
• Could the European Parliament’s Committee on Fisheries evolve into a Committee on ‘Maritime Affairs’?CFE: That is what we requested during the previous legislative period.
• Katere bodo vaše sporne in stične točke z Evropsko komisijo?CFE: Kar zadeva reformo skupne ribiške politike, bomo imeli po mojem mnenju več težav s Svetom kot z Evropsko komisijo.
We are seeking to obtain at least the coordination of maritime policy, in parallel with the remit of the Commissioner for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.
Ta se namreč dobro zaveda težav in rešitev ter majhne izbire, zato menim, da je na dobri poti in je storila že precej, da se je zamislila nad sabo v zeleni knjigi(2).
This question has not been addressed yet.
Težave, ki se bodo pojavile na kratki rok, bodo po mojem mnenju bolj povezane z načrti za upravljanje.
I think the European Parliament is waiting for the Treaty of Lisbon to enter into force to adapt the competences of the different committees.
Najprej zato, ker Evropska komisija ne upošteva družbenogospodarskih posledic niti posrednih učinkov teh načrtov, nato pa zato, ker se opira na zelo poenostavljena načela: če ulovimo manj rib, se cene zvišajo. To ne drži.
(1) Total allowable catches – maximum catches allowed for a given fish stock.(2) COM(2009) 163.
(1) Celotni dovoljeni ulov – največja odvzeta količina rib za dani morski stalež.(2) COM(2009) 163.
Port State, the lead player in the fight against illegal fishing la ge ul
Država pristanišča, jamstvo v boju proti nezakonitemu ribolovu la ge ul
Under the FAO agreement, the master of the fishing vessel must transmit to the port State of landing documentation that guarantees the lawfulness of the fish it is transporting: fishing licences, transhipment authorisations, catch on board, catch to be offloaded, etc.
V skladu s sporazumom FAO bo moral kapitan ladje državi pristanišča sporočiti več informacij, ki bi lahko jamčile zakonitost rib na krovu: ribolovna dovoljenja, dovoljenja za pretovarjanje, količino ulova na krovu, ulov, ki naj biseiztovoril itd.
The European Union has been applying its new regulation on illegal fishing since 1 January 2010. Meanwhile, an international agreement with the same aim is being adopted by the Council of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Medtem ko Evropska komisija od 1. januarja 2010 izvaja novo uredbo o boju proti nezakonitemu ribolovu, odbor Organizacije združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo trenutno sprejema mednarodni sporazum z enakim ciljem.
At the heart of this agreement is the port State, destined to play a crucial role in monitoring the lawfulness of goods landed and in eradicating illegal fishing.
Bistvo tega sporazuma je, da naj bi država pristanišča prevzela glavno vlogo pri nadzoru nad zakonitostjo iztovorjenega blaga in pri odpravi nezakonitega ribolova.
e op r u e in E s and a qu ac ul t ur is her i e F y 2010 I the fact that this new legal instrument is the crowning achievement of a long process that started in the FAO 16 years ago’, explains Jean-François Pulvénis de Séligny, Director of the Fisheries and Aquaculture Economics and Policy Division at the FAO.
io p r v v E o v bo go js t in ri o v i bi št R eb ru ar 2010 I I f pred 16 leti,“ pojasnjuje Jean-François Pulvénis de Séligny, direktor enote za gospodarstvo in politiko v oddelku FAO za ribištvo in ribogojstvo.
As early as 1993, an agreement aimed at encouraging respect for conservation and management measures by fishing vessels on the high seas recognised the role of the port State. The 1995 agreement on straddling and highly migratory fish stocks did the same.
V resnici je že sporazum iz leta 1993, katerega namen je bil, da bi ribiške ladje, ki lovijo na odprtem morju, spodbudili k upoštevanju zaščitnih in upravljavskih ukrepov, priznal vlogo države pristanišča, enako kot tudi sporazum iz leta 1995 o čezoceanskih staležih in velikih selivcih.
A few years later, in 2001, the International Plan of Action to prevent illegal fishing gave an even more central role to the port State.
Nekaj let pozneje, leta 2001, je bilo z mednarodnim akcijskim načrtom za preprečevanje nezakonitega ribolova državi pristanišča dodeljeno še osrednje mesto.
Then, in 2005, a model scheme of a voluntary nature recommended measures to improve port State controls and to eradicate illegal fishing.
In nazadnje, leta 2005 so bili z vzorčno shemo, ki je bila le prostovoljna, priporočeni ukrepi, ki jih je treba sprejeti za izboljšanje nadzora v državi pristanišča in zajezitev nezakonitega ribolova.
Every year, numerous violations of fishing rules – especially unauthorised fishing, catches of protected species, use of banned fishing gear or non-compliance with fishing quotas – endanger fish stocks and strongly destabilise the fishing economy.
Vsako leto številne ribolovne kršitve, zlasti ribolov brez dovoljenja, ulov zaščitenih vrst, uporaba prepovedanega ribolovnega orodja, pa tudi neupoštevanje ribolovnih kvot ogrožajo staleže rib in močno destabilizirajo ribiško gospodarstvo.
So far, none of the usual control measures has proved effective enough to eliminate illegal fishing.
Vendar se do zdaj nobeden od običajnih ukrepov ni izkazal kot dovolj učinkovit za odpravo nezakonitega ribolova.
Inspections on the high seas, for instance, which must be limited to three or four hours, do not allow a sufficiently detailed review of the cargo of vessels that sometimes transport hundreds of tonnes of fish.
Tako na primer z inšpekcijskimi pregledi na odprtem morju, ki lahko trajajo največ tri ali štiri ure, ni mogoče temeljito pregledati tovora na ladjah, ki včasih prevažajo več sto ton rib.
The same holds for satellite-based vessel monitoring systems (VMS).
Enako lahko ugotovimo za sistem satelitskega nadzora ladij (VMS): s tem sistemom seveda lahko spremljamo premike ladje, vendar ni mogoče natančno ugotoviti, ali je ladja med plovbo lovila ali ne.
This instrument of course makes it possible to track a vessel’s movement, but it cannot indicate precisely whether the vessel has fished or not during its navigation.
Nenazadnje se je za nezadostnega izkazal tudi tretji sveženj ukrepov, ki vključuje pošiljanje opazovalcev na ribiške ladje.
These different controls are also costly, making it hard for developing countries to put them in place.
Poleg tega so ti različni pregledi dragi, zato jih države v razvoju težko uvedejo.
‘This agreement is particularly important because it does not concern just one type of stocks and because it is not intended to be applied solely on the high seas’, continues Jean-François Pulvénis de Séligny.
„Ta sporazum je še toliko pomembnejši, ker se ne nanaša samo na eno vrsto staležev in ker naj se ne bi uporabljal samo na odprtem morju,“ še dodaja Jean-François Pulvénis de Séligny.
It also is not limited to fishing vessels alone, but covers all vessels related to the fisheries sector: refrigerated cargo ships, supply ships, etc. This is one way of guarding against illegal transhipments at sea.
Sporazum se poleg tega ne nanaša samo na ribiške ladje, ampak zajema vsa plovila, povezana z ribolovom: tovorne ladje s hladilniki, oskrbovalne ladje… To je eden od načinov, da se zavarujemo pred piratskim pretovarjanjem na odprtem morju.
This explains why the importance of giving responsibility to the authorities of the port State where vessels land their cargo has come to be recognised.
Zato je nujno treba naložiti več odgovornosti organom države pristanišča, v katerem ladje iztovarjajo tovor.
The negotiations in the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) proceeded very quickly.
Pogajanja v okviru Organizacije združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO) so bila sicer zelo hitra.