natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The competent institution of each of the Member States concerned shall take into account the periods referred to in paragraph 1, for the purposes of applying Article 46(2) excepting subparagraph (b).
Pristojni nosilec v vsaki od držav članic upo�teva dobe iz odstavka 1, za uporabo člena 46 (2), razen [točke] (b).
If the effect of applying paragraph 1 would be to relieve all the institutions of the Member States concerned of their obligations, benefits shall be awarded exclusively under the legislation of the last of those States whose conditions are satisfied, as if all the periods of insurance and residence completed and taken into account in accordance with Article 45(1) to (4) had been completed under the legislation of that State.’
Če bi uporaba določb odstavka 1 razbremenila odgovornosti vse nosilce zadevnih držav članic, se dajatve dodelijo izključno po zakonodaji zadnje od teh držav, po kateri so pogoji izpolnjeni, kot da bi bile vse zavarovalne dobe in dobe prebivanja, dopolnjene in upo�tevane v skladu s členom 45 (1) do (4), dopolnjene po zakonodaji te države.“
159; ‘the implementing regulation’), provides, in Article 36(3) thereof:
1, v nadaljevanju: izvedbena uredba) določa:
‘Where a claimant resides in the territory of a State which is not a Member State, he shall submit his claim [for old-age benefits] to the competent institution of that Member State to whose legislation the employed or selfemployed person was last subject.’
„Kadar ima vlagatelj zahtevka stalno prebivali�če na ozemlju države, ki ni država članica, svoj zahtevek [za dajatve za starost] predloži pristojnemu nosilcu tiste države članice, katere zakonodaja je zanj veljala nazadnje.“
Article 6(1) of the Law on old-age pensions (Algemene Ouderdomswet, ‘the AOW’) is worded as follows:
Člen 6(1) zakona o zavarovanju za starost (Algemene Ouderdomswet, v nadaljevanju: AOW) določa:
(b) non-residents subject to income tax on salaried occupational activities carried out in the Netherlands, who are not yet 65.’
„V skladu s temi določbami se zavarujejo: a) osebe s stalnim prebivali�čem in b) osebe brez stalnega prebivali�ča, ki so na podlagi plačanih poklicnih dejavnosti, ki jih opravljajo na Nizozemskem, zavezane za plačilo davka na dohodek in �e niso dopolnile 65 let.“
Under Article 7 of the AOW:
Člen 7 AOW določa:
(a) who are 65 or over, and
„V skladu z določbami tega zakona imajo pravico do starostne pokojnine: a) osebe, ki so dopolnile 65 let in
(b) who, in accordance with this law, were insured during the period from the date t h t h of their 15 birthday to the date of their 65 birthday inclusive are entitled to an old-age pension in accordance with the provisions of this law.’
CHUCK b) so bile v skladu s tem zakonom zavarovane v obdobju med dopolnjenim 15. in 65. letom starosti.“
In the nine months between those two periods the applicant worked in Denmark, where he paid social security contributions.
V devetih mesecih med tema obdobjema je delal na Danskem, kjer je plačeval prispevke za socialno varnost.
On reaching the age of 65, he submitted a claim for an old-age pension to the SVB.
Ko je dopolnil 65 let, je pri SVB vložil zahtevek za starostno pokojnino.
He submits that, pursuant to Article 48 of Regulation No 1408/71, the periods of insurance completed in Denmark should have been taken into account in the calculation of periods of insurance.
V njej zatrjuje, da bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 48 Uredbe �t. 1408/71 za izračun zavarovalne dobe upo�tevati tudi zavarovalno dobo, dopolnjeno na Danskem.
The fact that he was not resident in a Member State when he made his claim should not preclude the application of Article 48 of that regulation.
Dejstvo, da v času vložitve zahtevka ni stalno prebival na ozemlju države članice, ne bi smelo vplivati na uporabo navedenega člena 48.
On 27 July 2006, the Rechtbank te Amsterdam decided to stay proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:
Rechtbank te Amsterdam je 27. julija 2006 prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo to vpra�anje:
‘Where a worker is resident outside the [European] Community on the date on which he reaches pensionable age, should Article 48 of … Regulation [No 1408/71] be applied in the same way as in a case where the worker concerned is resident in the territory of the Community?’
„Ali je treba, če delavec v trenutku dopolnitve upokojitvene starosti stalno prebiva zunaj Skupnosti, uporabiti člen 48 Uredbe �t 1408/71 enako, kot če bi zadevni delavec stalno prebival na območju Skupnosti?“
By its question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Article 48(2) of Regulation No 1408/71 requires the competent institution of the last Member State in which a worker who is a national of a Member State resided to take into account, in calculating the old-age pension of that worker, who, when he submits his pension claim, is resident in a nonMember State, of the periods worked in another Member State under the same conditions as if that worker was still resident in the territory of the Community.
Predložitveno sodi�če s tem vpra�anjem v bistvu spra�uje, ali člen 48(2) Uredbe �t. 1408/71 pristojni instituciji zadnje države članice, v kateri je stalno prebival delavec državljan države članice, nalaga, da za izračun starostne pokojnine tega delavca, ki v času vložitve zahtevka za dodelitev te pokojnine prebiva v tretji državi, upo�teva dobe, v katerih je delal v drugi državi članici pod istimi pogoji, kot če bi delavec �e vedno stalno prebival na območju Skupnosti.
The SVB submits that Regulation No 1408/71 guarantees rights and benefits only to workers moving within the Community and that it cannot be inferred from the Court’s caselaw that persons falling under the scope of the Regulation can automatically derive rights from it.
SVB meni, da Uredba �t. 1408/71 zagotavlja pravice in dajatve le delavcem, ki se gibljejo znotraj Skupnosti, in da iz sodne prakse Sodi�ča ni mogoče sklepati, da lahko osebe, za katere se uporablja ta uredba, iz nje avtomatično izvajajo svoje pravice.
Furthermore, it would be required to apply Article 48 of that regulation in the case of a claimant who resided outside the Community only if the benefits to be aggregated were exportable on the basis of Article 10 of the Regulation.
Dodaja, da bi bil v primeru vlagatelja zahtevka za pokojnino, ki stalno prebiva zunaj Skupnosti, zavezan uporabiti določbe člena 48 navedene uredbe le, če bi bilo mogoče dajatve, ki se se�tevajo, izvoziti na podlagi člena 10 te uredbe.
It contends that Article 10 guarantees the exportability of a pension only to another Member State.
Slednji pa naj bi zagotavljal izvoz pokojnine le v drugo državo članico.
The SVB asserts, moreover, that since Community law does not provide for such benefits to be exported, it is a fortiori not possible to derive from it the right to export the aggregated periods of contribution on the basis of Article 48(2) of Regulation No 1408/71.
SVB poleg tega zatrjuje, da je glede na to, da pravo Skupnosti ne predvideva izvažanja takih dajatev, a fortiori iz njega nemogoče izpeljati pravico do izvoza se�tevka dob, v katerih so se vplačevali prispevki, na podlagi člena 48(2) Uredbe �t. 1408/71.
That conclusion is confirmed by Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1).
Ta sklep naj bi potrjeval člen 7 Uredbe (ES) �t. 883/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti (UL L 166, str. 1).
The Netherlands Government submits, by way of argument in favour of an answer in the affirmative to the question referred, that Article 42 EC provides for a system that guarantees workers’ social security rights in order to encourage their freedom of movement.
Nizozemska vlada v podporo pritrdilnemu odgovoru na predloženo vpra�anje navaja, da člen 42 ES vzpostavlja sistem, ki za spodbujanje prostega gibanja delavcem zagotavlja pravice do socialne varnosti.
That article lays down, for that purpose, first, a system of aggregation of all insurance periods beyond the national territory of each Member State which applies to the acquisition and the retention of rights to benefits and, secondly, the obligation to pay benefits throughout the Community.
V ta namen ta člen na eni strani določa, da se za pridobitev in obdržanje pravice do dajatev se�tevajo vse zavarovalne dobe zunaj nacionalnega ozemlja vsake države članice, na drugi strani pa, da se dajatve izplačujejo na celotnem območju Skupnosti.
Furthermore Article 36(3) of the implementing regulation lays down the procedure by which persons not resident in one of the Member States may claim an old-age pension.
Poleg tega člen 36(3) izvedbene uredbe predpisuje postopek, ki osebam brez stalnega prebivali�ča v eni izmed držav članic omogoča vlaganje zahtevkov za starostno pokojnino.
By way of argument in favour of an answer in the negative to that question, the Netherlands Government submits that Regulation No 1408/71 is designed to facilitate freedom of movement for workers and their families within the Community.
Vendar pa nizozemska vlada v podporo negativnemu odgovoru na navedeno vpra�anje ugotavlja, da je namen Uredbe �t.
That view is supported by the wording of Article 42 EC, which states that the Council of the European Union is to adopt such measures as are necessary to ensure payment of benefits to persons resident in the territories of Member States.
1408/71 spodbujanje prostega gibanja delavcev in njihovih družin znotraj Skupnosti, kar potrjuje tudi besedilo člena 42 ES, ki določa, da Svet Evropske unije sprejme ukrepe, ki osebam s prebivali�čem na ozemlju držav članic zagotavljajo izplačevanje dajatev.
Lastly the Netherlands Government states that, if the old-age pension must be calculated in accordance with Article 48(2) of Regulation No 1408/71, this does not mean that it is exportable to a nonMember State to be paid there.
Nazadnje nizozemska vlada poudarja, da naj – tudi če bi bilo treba starostno pokojnino izračunati v skladu s členom 48(2) Uredbe �t. 1408/71 – to ne bi pomenilo, da jo je mogoče izvoziti v tretjo državo in jo tam izplačati.
That question is not addressed by that regulation and is exclusively subject to national legislation.
Tega vpra�anja naj Uredba �t. 1408/71 ne bi urejala in naj bi bilo izključno predmet nacionalne zakonodaje.
The Commission of the European Communities proposes that the answer should be that, when a worker resides outside the Community at the time when he reaches the age of retirement, Article 48 of the Regulation must be applied in the same way as if the worker resided on the territory of the Community.
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti predlaga odgovor, v skladu s katerim je treba, če delavec v trenutku dopolnitve upokojitvene starosti stalno prebiva zunaj Skupnosti, člen 48 Uredbe �t. 1408/71 uporabiti enako, kot če bi zadevni delavec stalno prebival na območju Skupnosti.
For the purpose of the application of that article it is not decisive whether the place of residence is within the Community or outside it.
Meni, da to, ali je stalno prebivali�če na območju Skupnosti ali zunaj tega območja, ne vpliva na uporabo te določbe.
It thus allows different national schemes to continue to exist, giving rise to separate claims against different national social security institutions.
Tako naj bi dopu�čala različnost nacionalnih zakonodaj, ki ustvarjajo različne terjatve do posameznih nacionalnih institucij.
Furthermore, it is evident that what matters for the application of those rules is the relationship between a worker and the social security system of a particular Member State under which he has been insured for a given period, rather than the place where an occupational activity is carried out.
Poleg tega naj bi bila za uporabo teh pravil pomembnej�a povezava med delavcem in socialnim sistemom določene države članice, kjer je bil zavarovan v določenem obdobju, kot pa kraj, kjer opravlja poklicno dejavnost.
The Commission concludes that, if the SVB’s reasoning were to be followed, that would deprive the principle of aggregation provided for by Regulation No 1408/71 of much of its effectiveness.
Komisija zato sklepa, da bi, če bi sledili utemeljitvam SVB, načelu se�tevanja, ki ga določa Uredba �t. 1408/71, odvzeli precej učinkovitosti.
None the less, no provision of Community law requires social benefits actually to be paid in nonMember States.
Vendar pa naj ne bi nobena določba prava Skupnosti določala, da se socialne dajatve izplačujejo v tretje države.
The detailed rules for the payment of those benefits continue to be governed by national law.
Način izplačevanja teh dajatev �e vedno ureja nacionalno pravo.
The Greek and Italian Governments essentially share the Commission’s view.
Gr�ka in italijanska vlada se v bistvu strinjata s stali�čem Komisije.
The Greek Government also draws attention to the importance of Article 36 of the implementing regulation, which refers to the situation of a claimant who is not resident in the Community when he claims benefits.
Prva od navedenih vlad opozarja tudi na pomembnost člena 36 izvedbene uredbe, ki ureja položaj vlagatelja, ki v času vložitve zahtevka za dajatve nima stalnega prebivali�ča na območju Skupnosti.
The Court has held that Article 51 of the EEC Treaty (subsequently Article 51 of the EC Treaty, and now, after amendment, Article 42 EC) leaves in being differences between the Member States’ social security schemes and, consequently, in the rights of persons working in the Member States (Case C-227/89 Rönfeldt [1991] ECR I-323, paragraph 12).
Opozoriti je treba, da je Sodi�če presodilo, da člen 51 EGS (ki je postal člen 51 ES in po spremembi člen 42 ES) dopu�ča razlike med sistemi socialne varnosti držav članic in posledično tudi med pravicami oseb, ki delajo v teh državah (sodba z dne 7. februarja 1991 v zadevi Rönfeldt, C-227/89, Recueil, str. I-323, točka 12).
It allows different schemes to continue to exist, creating different claims on different institutions against which the claimant possesses direct rights by virtue either of national law alone or of national law supplemented, where necessary, by Community law (Case 100/78 Rossi [1979] ECR 831, paragraph 13).
Dopu�ča razlike med zakonodajami, ki ustvarjajo različne terjatve do posameznih institucij, do katerih je prejemnik neposredno upravičen na podlagi zgolj notranjega prava ali pa notranjega prava, ki se po potrebi dopolnjuje s pravom Skupnosti (sodba z dne 6. marca 1979 v zadevi Rossi, 100/78, Recueil, str. 831, točka 13).
It is common ground that Regulation No 1408/71 does not expressly address the situation at issue in the main proceedings, concerning the effect of the place of residence of the person insured when he claims an old-age pension on the calculation of his pension rights in respect of periods worked in various Member States.
Uredba �t. 1408/71 nedvomno ne ureja izrecno primera, kot je ta v postopku v glavni stvari, kar zadeva vpra�anje vpliva, ki ga ima kraj stalnega prebivali�ča zavarovanca v času vložitve zahtevka za starostno pokojnino na izračun njegovih pravic do pokojnine za obdobja, v katerih je delal v različnih državah članicah.
Article 2 of that regulation requires only, for its application, the fulfilment of two conditions: the worker must be a national of one of the Member States (or be a stateless person or refugee residing within the territory of one of the Member States) and be or have been subject to the legislation of one or several Member States.
Člen 2 navedene uredbe njeno uporabo pravzaprav navezuje le na izpolnjevanje dveh pogojev, in sicer da je delavec državljan ene od držav članic (ali oseba brez državljanstva, ali begunec, ki stalno prebiva na ozemlju ene od držav članic) in da zanj velja zakonodaja ene ali več držav članic.
As regards Article 10 of Regulation No 1408/71, it prohibits residence clauses only between Member States.
Člen 10 iste uredbe pa pogoj stalnega prebivali�ča prepoveduje le med državami članicami.
However, as the Advocate General notes in point 44 of his Opinion, Regulation No 1408/71 seeks to achieve the objective set out in Article 51 of the Treaty by preventing the possible negative effects that the exercise of the freedom of movement for workers could have on the enjoyment, by workers and their families, of social security benefits, in particular so far as concerns the career of migrant workers who have contributed to various social security systems, and thus to provide workers with legal certainty that they will retain the pension rights deriving from their contributions to pension systems in a similar way to a worker who has not exercised his right to freedom of movement within the Community.
Vendar pa sku�a Uredba �t. 1408/71, kot poudarja generalni pravobranilec v točki 44 sklepnih predlogov, cilj iz člena 51 Pogodbe doseči s preprečevanjem negativnih učinkov, ki bi jih – zlasti v primeru kariere delavcev migrantov, ki so prispevali v različne sisteme socialne varnosti – lahko imelo izvajanje pravice do prostega gibanja delavcev na dajatve iz socialne varnosti, ki jih uživajo delavci in njihove družine, in jim s tem zagotoviti pravno varnost, da bodo ohranili pokojninske pravice, nastale na podlagi njihovih prispevkov v pokojninske sisteme, tako kot delavec, ki ni izkoristil pravice do prostega gibanja v Skupnosti.
In dealing with the aggregation of insurance periods of less than one year completed under the legislation of a given Member State with insurance periods completed in other Member States, Article 48 of Regulation No 1408/71 contributes to guaranteeing freedom of movement for workers between the Member States.
Člen 48 navedene uredbe s tem, da ureja se�tevanje zavarovalnih dob, kraj�ih od enega leta, dopolnjenih po zakonodaji ene države članice, in zavarovalnih dob, dopolnjenih v drugih državah članicah, prispeva k zagotavljanju delavčeve svobode gibanja med državami članicami.
Consequently, Article 48, the application of which, moreover, does not depend on the place of residence of the worker when he claims an old-age pension, cannot be interpreted as meaning that the mere fact that he has moved his place of residence to a nonMember State will call into question his right to have his old-age pension calculated in accordance with the rules set out in that article.
Zato je treba ugotoviti, da tega člena 48, katerega uporaba sicer ni pogojena s krajem stalnega prebivali�ča delavca v času vložitve zahtevka za starostno pokojnino, ni mogoče razlagati tako, da postane zgolj zaradi selitve v tretjo državo in s tem povezane spremembe stalnega prebivali�ča vpra�ljiva pravica zadevne osebe do izračuna starostne pokojnine po pravilih iz tega člena.
In addition, it follows from the wording of Article 36(3) of the implementing regulation, first, that an old-age pension claim can be submitted by a non-resident in a Member State and, secondly, it must be addressed to a competent institution of the Member State to whose legislation the claimant was last subject.
Poleg tega iz besedila člena 36(3) izvedbene uredbe na eni strani izhaja, da lahko zahtevek za starostno pokojnino vloži tudi oseba, ki nima stalnega prebivali�ča v državi članici, na drugi strani pa, da je treba zahtevek predložiti pristojni instituciji tiste države članice, katere zakonodaja je za vlagatelja veljala nazadnje.
Moreover, it should be pointed out that the last Member State concerned is not subject to an obligation to pay that pension in a nonMember State.
Poleg tega je treba poudariti, da zadnja zadevna država članica te pokojnine ni dolžna izplačevati na ozemlje tretje države.
The Court, following the example of the Advocate General, would point out that, while Article 10 of Regulation No 1408/71 introduces a binding right to have a pension paid in any Member State, neither that regulation nor any provision of Community law requires Member States to pay pensions in nonMember States.
Po zgledu generalnega pravobranilca je namreč treba poudariti, da čeprav člen 10 Uredbe �t. 1408/71 določa iztožljivo pravico prejemati pokojnino v kateri koli državi članici Skupnosti, niti Uredba niti katera koli določba prava Skupnosti držav članic ne obvezuje, da izplačujejo pokojnine v tretje države.
It follows that the detailed arrangements for paying such an old-age pension remain subject to the provisions of the national law of the Member State of the institution responsible for paying the pension.
To pomeni, da ostaja praksa izplačevanja starostne pokojnine odvisna od določb nacionalnega prava države članice, katere institucija je zavezana izplačevati pokojnino.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, the answer to the question referred must be that Article 48(2) of Regulation No 1408/71 requires the competent institution of the last Member State in which a worker who is a national of a Member State resided to take into account, in the calculation of the old-age pension of that worker, who, when he submits his pension claim is resident in a nonMember State, of the periods worked in another Member State under the same conditions as if that worker still resided in the Community.
Ob upo�tevanju vseh zgoraj navedenih ugotovitev je treba na zastavljeno vpra�anje odgovoriti, da člen 48(2) Uredbe �t. 1408/71 pristojni instituciji zadnje države članice, v kateri je stalno prebival delavec državljan države članice, nalaga, da za izračun starostne pokojnine tega delavca, ki v času vložitve zahtevka za dodelitev te pokojnine prebiva v tretji državi, upo�teva dobe, v katerih je delal v drugi državi članici pod istimi pogoji, kot če bi delavec �e vedno stalno prebival na območju Skupnosti.
Article 48(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to selfemployed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Regulation (EC) No 631/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 , requires the competent institution of the last Member State in which a worker who is a national of a Member State resided to take into account, in calculating the old-age pension of that worker, who, when he submits his pension claim, is resident in a nonMember State, of the periods worked in another Member State under the same conditions as if that worker still resided in the European Community.
Člen 48(2) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 z dne 14. junija 1971 o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe, samozaposlene osebe in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti, v različici, kot je bila spremenjena in posodobljena z Uredbo (ES) št. 631/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004, pristojni instituciji zadnje države članice, v kateri je stalno prebival delavec državljan države članice, nalaga, da za izračun starostne pokojnine tega delavca, ki v času vložitve zahtevka za dodelitev te pokojnine prebiva v tretji državi, upošteva dobe, v katerih je delal v drugi državi članici pod istimi pogoji, kot če bi delavec še vedno stalno prebival na območju Skupnosti.
Case C-346/06
Zadeva C-346/06
(Article 49 EC — Freedom to provide services — Restrictions — Directive 96/71/EC — Posting of workers in the context of the provision of services — Procedures for the award of public works contracts — Social protection of workers)
„Člen 49 ES – Svoboda opravljanja storitev – Omejitve – Direktiva 96/71/ES – Napotitev delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev – Postopki oddaje javnih naročil za gradnje – Socialno varstvo delavcev“
Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 20 September 2006 . . . . . .
Bota, predstavljeni 20. septembra 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Freedom to provide services — Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services — Directive 96/71
Svoboda opravljanja storitev – Napotitev delavca na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev – Direktiva 96/71
(European Parliament and Council Directive 96/71, Art. 3(1) and (8))
(Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 96/71, člena 3(1) in 8)
SUMMARY — CASE C-346/06
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-346/06
(European Parliament and Council Directive 96/71, Art. 3)
(Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 96/71, člen 3)