natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Actions for failure to fulfil obligations — Examination of merits by the Court — Situation to be taken into consideration — Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion
Tožba zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti – Preizkus utemeljenosti, ki ga opravi Sodišče – Upo�tevni pdožaj – Stanje ob poteku roka, določenega v obrazloženim mnenju
(Art. 226 EC)
(člen 226 ES)
SUMMARY — CASE C-412/04
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-412/04
Approximation of laws — Procedures for the award of public services, supply and works contracts — Directives 92/50, 93/36 and 93/37 — Determination according to the main purpose of the contract — Mixed works, supply and service contracts — Supply or service contracts including ancillary works
Približevanje zakonodaj – Postopki oddaje javnih naročil storitev, blaga in gradenj – Direktive 92/50, 93/36 in 93/37 – Določitev glede na glavni predmet pogodbe – Mešana naročila gradenj, blaga in storitev – Naročila blaga ali storitev, ki vključujejo dodatna dela
Approximation of laws — Procedures for the award of public works contracts — Directive 93/37 — Award of contracts
Približevanje zakonodaj – Postopki oddaje javnih naročil gradenj – Direktiva 93/37 – Oddaja javnih naročil
Approximation of laws — Procedures for the award of public works contracts — Directive 93/37 — Scope
Približevanje zakonodaj – Postopki oddaje javnih naročil gradenj – Direktiva 93/37 – Področje uporabe
Approximation of laws — Procedures for the award of public service contracts and contracts in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors — Directives 92/50 and 93/38 — Award of contracts
Približevanje zakonodaj – Postopki oddaje javnih naročil storitev ter naročil naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem, transportnem in telekomunikacijskem sektorju – Direktivi 92/50 in 93/38 – Oddaja javnih naročil
Procedure — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 38(1)(c))
Postopek – Vloga, s katero se postopek začne – obličnosti Zahteve (Poslovnik Sodišča, člen 38(1)(c))
The question whether a Member State has failed to fulfil its obligations must be determined by reference to the situation obtaining in the Member State at the end of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion.
Obstoj neizpolnitve obveznosti je treba presoditi glede na položaj države članice, kot je obstajal ob preteku roka, določenega v obrazloženem mnenju.
In that connection, the adoption of laws, regulations or administrative provisions after the date on which that period expired cannot be taken into account.
Glede tega ni mogoče upo�tevati sprejetja zakonskih in drugih predpisov po datumu izteka navedenega roka.
A Member State which makes mixed works, supply and service contracts and supply or service contracts which include ancillary works if the works represent more than 50% of the total value of the relevant contract subject to the national rules on public works contracts fails to fulfil its obligations under Directive 92/50 coordinating procedures for the award of public service contracts, Directive 93/36 coordinating the procedures for the award of public supply contracts and Directive 93/37 coordinating the procedures for the award of
Država članica, ki uporablja nacionalno ureditev glede javnih naročil gradenj za me�ana naročila gradenj, blaga in storitev ter za naročila blaga ali storitev, ki vključujejo dodatna dela, če ta dela predstavljajo več kot 50 % cene zadevnega naročila, ne izpolni obveznosti iz Direktive 92/50 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil storitev, Direktive 93/36 o usklajevanju postopkov oddaje javnih naročil blaga in Direktive 93/37 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo
(see paras 42, 43)
(Glej točki 42 in 43.)
COMMISSION v ITALY public works contracts, as amended by Directive 97/52.
KOMISIJA PROTI ITALIJI javnih naročil za gradnje, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/52.
Furthermore, such national rules also fail to comply with the requirements of Directives 92/50 and 93/36, in so far as its application may result in certain mixed contracts falling outside the procedures provided for in those directives, namely those contracts where the works, although ancillary, represent more than 50% of the total value and the total value is below the threshold set by Directive 93/37 even though it reaches the thresholds adopted in Directives 92/50 and 93/36.
Poleg tega ima taka nacionalna ureditev za posledico tudi kr�itev zahtev direktiv 92/50 in 93/36, če bi njena uporaba lahko vodila do izmika določenih me�anih naročil postopkom, določenim s tema direktivama, in sicer tistih naročil, v katerih vrednost gradnje, tudi dodatne, predstavlja več kot 50 % skupne cene, pri čemer ostaja pod pragom, določenim z Direktivo 93/37, čeprav dosega prage, določene z direktivama 92/50 in 93/36.
(see paras 47-49, 50, 51, operative part 1)
(Glej točke od 47 do 49, 50 in 51 ter točko 1 izreka.)
The Community legislature expressly made a policy choice to exclude contracts under a certain threshold from the advertising regime which it introduced and therefore did not impose any specific obligation with respect to them.
Ko namreč pogodba hkrati vsebuje elemente, ki se nana�ajo na javno naročilo gradenj, in elemente, ki se nana�ajo na neko drugo vrsto naročila, je glavni predmet pogodbe tisto, kar določa, katera direktiva Skupnosti o javnih naročilih se bo načeloma uporabila.
Where it is established that such a contract is of certain crossborder interest, the award, in the absence of any transparency, of that contract to an undertaking located in the same Member State as the contracting authority amounts to a difference in treatment to the detriment of undertakings which might be interested in the contract but which are
Tako je področje uporabe Direktive 93/37 vezano zlasti na glavni predmet pogodbe, ki mora biti določen v okviru objektivnega preizkusa celotnega naročila, na katero se nana�a ta pogodba.
Where a contract contains both elements relating to a public works contract and elements relating to another type of contract, it is the main purpose of the contract that determines which Community directive on public procurement is to be applied in principle.
Do te določitve mora priti glede na bistvene obveznosti, ki prevladajo in ki kot take določajo to naročilo, ne pa glede na obveznosti, ki so le nebistvene ali dopolnilne in so določene s samim predmetom pogodbe, pri čemer je zadevna vrednost posameznih predstavljenih storitev le eno izmed meril, ki jih je treba upo�tevati za navedeno določitev.
In particular, therefore, the scope of Directive 93/37 is linked to the main purpose of the contract, which must be determined in an objective examination of the entire transaction to which the contract relates.
Zato vrednost gradnje ne more biti izključno merilo za uporabo ureditve o javnih naročilih gradenj za me�ano naročilo, če je ta gradnja le dodatna, razen s kr�itvijo zahtev Direktive 93/37.
The assessment must be made in the light of the essential obligations which predominate and which, as such, characterise the transaction, as opposed to those which are only ancillary or supplementary in nature and are required by the very purpose of the contract; the value of the various matters covered by the contract is, in that regard, just one criterion among others to be taken into account for the purposes of the assessment.
Zakonodajalec Skupnosti se je izrecno in načelno odločil pustiti naročila, katerih vrednost je manj�a od določenega praga, zunaj ureditve objave, ki jo je uvedel, tako da posledično glede njih ni določil nobene obveznosti.
Therefore, the value of the works cannot constitute the sole criterion capable of resulting in the application of the rules on public works contracts to a mixed contract, where those works are only ancillary, without infringing the requirements of Directive 93/97.
Če se ugotovi, da tako naročilo pomeni določen čezmejni interes, pomeni popolnoma nepregledna oddaja tega naročila podjetju, ki se nahaja v državi članici naročnika, različno obravnavanje v �kodo podjetij, ki bi jih lahko navedeno naročilo zanimalo, vendar se nahajajo v drugi državi članici.
SUMMARY — CASE C-412/04 not call into question the applicability of Articles 43 EC and 49 EC to those contracts.
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-412/04 izpodbija dejstva, da se člena 43 ES in 49 ES uporabljata za navedena naročila.
located in other Member States. Unless it is justified by objective circumstances, such a difference in treatment, which, by excluding all undertakings located in another Member State, operates mainly to the detriment of the latter undertakings, amounts to indirect discrimination on the basis of nationality, prohibited under Articles 43 EC and 49 EC.
Razen če je upravičeno z objektivnimi okoli�činami, tako različno obravnavanje, ki je z izključitvijo vseh podjetij iz drugih držav članic predvsem njim v �kodo, pomeni posredno diskriminacijo glede na državljanstvo, ki je na podlagi členov 43 ES in 49 ES prepovedana.
(see paras 65-68)
(Glej točke od 65 do 68.)
A Member State which authorises the direct award of works or a work to the holder of a building permit or an approved estate plan by providing for an award procedure which complies with the requirements of Directive 93/37 only, where the works are divided into several lots, if the estimated value of each of those lots, taken individually, exceeds the threshold for the application of the directive fails to fulfil its obligations under Directive 93/37 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public words contracts, as amended by Directive 97/52.
Država članica, ki dovoljuje neposredno dodelitev gradnje in del poobla�čenemu imetniku gradbenega dovoljenja ali potrjenega načrta razdelitve zemlji�ča, s tem da je postopek oddaje v skladu z določbami navedene direktive določila le v primeru – če je gradnja nadalje razdeljena na več sklopov –, ko ocenjena vrednost posameznega sklopa, ki se obravnava individualno, presega prag, določen za njeno uporabo, ne izpolni obveznosti iz Direktive 93/37 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil za gradnje, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/52.
Since, under Article 249 EC, directives are binding as to the result to be achieved upon each Member State to which they are addressed and since the Community legislature excluded certain contracts from the scope of Directive 93/37, in particular by laying down thresholds, the Member States are not required to adopt, in the legislation transposing that directive, provisions recalling the obligation to comply with Articles 43 EC and 49 EC, which is applicable only in the circumstances cited above.
Ker so, prvič, v skladu s členom 249 ES, direktive za vsako državo članico, na katero so naslovljene, zavezujoče glede cilja, ki ga je treba doseči, in ker, drugič, je zakonodajalec Skupnosti, zlasti z določitvijo pragov, s področja uporabe Direktive 93/37 izključil določena naročila, države članice niso dolžne za prenos te direktive v svojo ureditev sprejeti določb, ki se sklicujejo na obveznost spo�tovanja členov 43 ES in 49 ES, ki se uporablja le pod prej navedenimi pogoji.
The fact that the national legislature did not adopt such provisions with respect to public contracts for infrastructure works executed by the holder of a building permit or an approved estate plan the value of which is below the threshold for application of Directive 93/37, for cases where the existence of a certain crossborder interest is established, does
Neravnanje nacionalnega zakonodajalca v zvezi s tem, da gre za javna naročila, ki se nana�ajo na komunalna ureditvena dela v vrednosti, ki je manj�a od praga, določenega z veljavnimi pravili Direktive 93/37, in ki jih izvede imetnik gradbenega dovoljenja ali potrjenega načrta razdelitve zemlji�ča, če je ugotovljen obstoj določenega čezmejnega interesa, pa ne
The fact that a provision of national law allowing direct execution by the holder of a building permit or an approved estate plan of infrastructure works which offset the whole or part of the contribution payable in respect of the permit forms part of a set of urban development regulations which are of a special nature and pursue a specific aim that is separate from Directive 93/37 is not sufficient to exclude the direct execution of works
Okoli�čina, da določba nacionalnega prava predvideva neposredno izvedbo komunalnih ureditvenih del, ki jih izvede imetnik gradbenega dovoljenja ali potrjenega načrta razdelitve zemlji�ča, ki se v celoti ali deloma odbijejo od prispevka, dolgovanega iz naslova dodelitve dovoljenja, je del pravil na področju
COMMISSION v ITALY the award of the contract must comply with the rules on advertising laid down therein, may be calculated solely by reference to the total value of the various works, by adding together the value of the various lots.
KOMISIJA PROTI ITALIJI dosežen prag, določen s to direktivo, in ali mora zato dodelitev naročila upo�tevati pravila ogla�evanja, ki jih ta določa – upo�tevati le glede celotne vrednosti gradenj in del, in sicer s se�tevkom vrednosti posameznih sklopov.
(see paras 70-74, operative part 1) from the scope of the directive when the elements needed to bring it within the scope of the directive are present.
urbanizma, ki ima svoje značilnosti in sledi posebnemu cilju, drugačnemu od Direktive 93/37, ne zado�ča za izključitev neposredne izvedbe področja uporabe slednje direktive, kadar so zahtevani elementi, ki so z njo zajeti, združeni.
Such execution must therefore be subject to the procedures provided for in Directive 93/37 where it satisfies the conditions contained therein for classification of a public works contract and, in particular, where the contractual element required in Article 1(a) thereof is present and the value of the work is equal to or higher than the threshold laid down in Article 6(1).
Ta izvedba mora biti tako podvržena postopkom, določenim z Direktivo 93/37, kadar izpolnjuje pogoje, določene v tej direktivi za določitev lastnosti javnega naročila gradenj, in zlasti kadar je navzoč pogodbeni element, ki se zahteva s členom 1(a) te direktive in ko je vrednost gradenj enaka pragu ali presega prag, ki ga določa njen člen 6(1).
A Member State which allows, first, the supervision of works which is as a rule the responsibility of the technical departments of the contracting authorities, to the project designer and, second, the award of testing and of inspection tasks in respect of public works, to third parties featured on lists drawn up for that purpose by the Ministry of Public Works, without using the procedures relating to the opening of contracts up to competition fails to fulfil its obligations under Directive 92/50 on public service contracts and Directive 93/38 coordinating the procurement procedures for entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors.
Država članica, ki dovoljuje da se, prvič, naloge vodenja gradnje, za katere so načeloma zadolženi tehnični oddelki naročnika, zaupajo projektantu in, drugič, naloge preverjanj ter nadzora javnih gradenj dodelijo tretjim, navedenim na seznamih, ki jih v ta namen sestavi ministrstvo za javna dela, ne da bi uporabili postopke javnega razpisa, ne izpolni obveznosti iz direktiv 92/50 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil storitev in 93/38 o usklajevanju postopkov naročanja naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem, transportnem in telekomunikacijskem sektorju.
Furthermore, it is clear from Article 6(3) of Directive 93/37 that, where a work is subdivided into several lots, each one the subject of a contract, the value of each lot must be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the amount referred to in Article 6(1), which determines whether or not the directive is applicable to all the lots.
Poleg tega iz člena 6(3) Direktive 93/37 izhaja, da če je gradnja nadalje razdeljena na več sklopov in je vsak sklop predmet naročila, je treba upo�tevati vrednost vsakega sklopa pri izračunu zneskov iz odstavka 1 tega člena, na podlagi česar se določi, ali je treba to direktivo uporabiti za vse sklope ali ne.
In addition, under Article 6(4), no work or contract may be split up with the intention of avoiding the application of the directive.
Poleg tega se v skladu z njenim členom 6(4) nobena gradnja ali naročilo ne sme nadalje razdeliti z namenom, da bi se izognili uporabi te direktive.
Therefore, if the agreement concluded between a private person who is the owner of development land and the municipal authority satisfies the criteria for the definition of a ‘public works contract’ within the meaning of Article 1(a) of Directive 93/37, the estimated value which must in principle be taken into account in order to ascertain whether the threshold set by the directive is attained and whether, therefore,
Zato kadar pogodba, sklenjena med posameznikom, lastnikom zemlji�č, ki se delijo na sklope, in komunalno upravo, ustreza merilom opredelitve pojma „javna naročila gradenj“ v smislu člena 1(a) Direktive 93/37, je treba ocenjeno vrednost – ki je načeloma upo�tevana pri ugotovitvi, ali je bil
Supervision and the inspection of works are included in Category No 12 of both Annex I A to Directive 92/50 and Annex XVI A to Directive 93/38.
Edini izjemi, ki dovoljujeta uporabo direktiv 92/50 in 93/38, sta namreč tisti,
SUMMARY — CASE C-412/04
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-412/04 navedeni direktivi v zvezi z naročili, ki spadajo na njuno področje uporabe.
It is clear from Article 38(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice and from the caselaw relating to that provision, that an application must state the subjectmatter of the proceedings and a summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based, and that that statement must be sufficiently clear and precise to enable the defendant to prepare his defence and the Court to rule on the application.
Iz člena 38(1)(c) Poslovnika Sodi�ča in upo�tevne sodne prakse izhaja, da je treba v vsaki tožbi navesti predmet spora in kratek povzetek tožbenih razlogov in da mora biti ta dovolj jasen in natančen, da toženi stranki omogoča pripravo obrambe in Sodi�ču njen preizkus.
It is therefore necessary for the essential points of law and of fact on which a case is based to be indicated coherently and intelligibly in the application itself and for the heads of claim to be set out unambiguously so that the Court does not rule ultra petita or indeed fail to rule on an objection.
Iz tega izhaja, da morajo biti temeljni elementi glede dejstev in prava, na katerih tožba temelji, skladno in razumljivo razvidni iz besedila same vloge in da morajo biti ti predlogi izraženi nedvoumno, da se prepreči, da bi Sodi�če odločilo ultra petitum ali da o očitku ne bi odločilo.
awarded in particular in accordance with the provisions of Title III of that directive which concerns the choice of award procedures and, second, from Article 15 of Directive 93/38 that supply and works contracts and contracts which have as their object services listed in Annex XVI A are to be awarded in accordance with, inter alia, the provisions of Title IV of Directive 93/38, relating to award procedures.
Glede tega, prvič, iz člena 8 Direktive 92/50 izhaja, da se naročila, katerih predmet so storitve, na�tete v navedeni prilogi I A, oddajajo predvsem v skladu z določbami iz naslova III te direktive, ki je namenjen izbiri postopkov oddaje navedenih naročil, in, drugič, iz člena 15 Direktive 93/38 izhaja, da se naročila blaga in gradenj ter naročila, katerih predmet so storitve, na�tete v prilogi XVI A, oddajo zlasti v skladu s predpisi naslova VI te direktive, ki se nana�a na postopke oddaje naročil.
Therefore, in so far as contracts for the supervision of works must be awarded in accordance with the rules laid down by Directives 92/50 and 93/38, the direct award to the project designer infringes those directives as regards contracts which, having regard to their value, fall within the scope of the directives.
Zato ker je treba dodelitev nalog vodenja gradnje opraviti v skladu s pravili, določenimi z direktivama 92/50 in 93/38, neposredna dodelitev projektantu kr�i ti direktivi v zvezi z naročili, ki glede na svojo vrednost spadajo na področje njune uporabe.
Likewise, in so far as contracts for inspection works must be awarded in accordance with the rules laid down by Directives 92/50 and 93/38, the award to third parties infringes those directives as regards the contracts included in their scope.
Ker je treba dodelitev naloge nadziranja gradnje opraviti v skladu s pravili, določenimi z direktivama 92/50 in 93/38, bi dodelitev tretjim prav tako kr�ila
I — Introduction communications sectors (93/38/EEC, also of 14 June 1993) (‘the Directives’). 5
I – Uvod nikacijskem sektorju (93/38/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993) 5.
The Commission has brought an action under Article 226 EC, seeking a declaration from the Court of Justice that Italy has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 EC and 49 EC and under the Council Directives concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992), 2 public supply contracts (93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993), 3and public works contracts (93/37/EEC, also of 14 June 1993), 4 and coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and tele-
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti je vložila tožbo na podlagi člena 226 ES, da bi Sodi�če ugotovilo, da Italijanska republika ni izpolnila obveznosti iz členov 43 ES in 49 ES ter iz direktiv Sveta o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil storitev (92/50/EGS z dne 18. junija 1992) 2, blaga (93/36/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993) 3, za gradnje (93/37/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993) 4 ter o usklajevanju postopkov naročanja naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem, transportnem in telekomu -
The Commission claims that the infringement is entailed by Articles 2(1) and (5), 17(12), 27(2), 28(4), 30(6a), 37b, and 37c(1) of Law No 109 of 11 February 1994, Legge quadro in materia di lavori pubblici (Framework Law on public contracts).
Po mnenju Komisije neizpolnitev obveznosti izhaja iz členov 2(1) in (5), 17(12), 27(2), 28(4), 30(6a), 37b in 37c(1) okvirnega zakona o javnih gradnjah (legge quadro in materia di lavori pubblici, zakon �t. 109/94 z dne 11. februarja 1994).
6It alleges that it consists specifically in: (1) the exclusion of mixed contracts from Law No 109/94 if the ancillary works represent more than 50 % of the price; (2) the award of contracts directly to the holder of a building permit or development plan in cases where the works do not exceed the financial thresholds provided for in Directive 93/37; (3) the procedure for awarding contracts for the design, supervision and inspection of works
6Tožba temelji na naslednjih očitkih: 1. izključitev me�anih naročil s področja uporabe zakona �t. 109/94, če dodatna dela predstavljajo več kot 50 % cene; 2. neposredna dodelitev gradnje in del imetniku gradbenega dovoljenja ali načrta razdelitve zemlji�ča, če je vrednost teh del nižja od pragov za uporabo Direktive 93/37; 3. način dodelitve nalog projektiranja, vodenja in nadziranja gradnje, katerih vrednosti so nižje od pragov Skupnosti;
1; amended by European Parliament and Council Directive 97/52/EC of 13 October 1997 (OJ 1997 L 328, p.
1, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/52/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. oktobra 1997 (UL L 328, str.
1), and by Commission Directive 2001/78/EC of 13 September 2001 (OJ 2001 L 285, p.
1) in Direktivo Komisije 2001/78/ES z dne 13. septembra 2001 (UL L 285, str.
1); repealed, except for Article 41, with effect from 31 January 2006, by Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).
1); razen člena 41 je bila razveljavljena z učinkom od 31. januarja 2006 z Direktivo 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev (UL L 134, str. 114).
1; likewise amended and repealed by the directives referred to in the previous footnote.
84, kot je bila spremenjena z direktivama 98/4/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 1998 (UL L 101, str.