natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
This would allow the EU to adjust priorities/torespond to new needs and to back them up by budgetary resources.
To bi Uniji omogočilo, da prilagodi prednostne naloge oziroma se odzove na nove potrebe, in da jih podpre s proračunskimi sredstvi.
This approach will also give a concrete contribution to the system of economic governance ofthe EU, taking fully into consideration the impact of actions needed to reach shared objectives.It will provide for a greater consistency of cohesion policy with the broad economic policy guidelines and the employment guidelines, thus better integrating it into the European agenda forsustainable growth.
Ta pristop bo dal tudi konkreten prispevek k sistemu gospodarskega upravljanja Unije, ob polnem upoštevanju učinka ukrepov, potrebnih za doseganje skupnih ciljev. Zagotovil bo večjousklajenost kohezijske politike s Splošnimi smernicami za gospodarske politike držav članic in Skupnosti in Smernicami za zaposlovanje in slednje na ta način učinkoviteje vključil v okvirsplošnih evropskih ciljev na področju trajnostne rasti.
The instruments available to the EU to further its policy goals include regulation, coordination andbudgetary support.
Instrumenti, ki so na voljo Uniji za doseganje ciljev v okviru različnih politik, vključujejo zakonske predpise, usklajevanje in proračunsko podporo.
The relative share of EU and Member States’ expenditure is not the same in eachpolicy area.
Sorazmerni deleži odhodkov Unije in držav članic nisoenaki na vseh političnih področjih.
It represents the large majority of financial support granted to a sector (e.g. agriculture)or a significant share of resources allocated to a certain objective (e.g. cohesion in lagging regions).In other fields, EU expenditure is usually of more limited size by comparison with the resources provided by Member States: in such cases the role is rather one of acting as a catalyst.
Ti deleži imajo lahko obliko obsežne finančne podpore, dodeljenedoločenemu sektorju (npr. kmetijstvu), ali znatnega deleža sredstev, dodeljenih uresničevanju določenega cilja (npr. kohezija v regijah z razvojnim zaostankom). Na drugih področjih je obseg odhodkov Evropske unije običajno manjši glede na sredstva, ki jih zagotavljajo države članice: v teh primerihigrajo sredstva Unije bolj vlogo katalizatorja.
Depending on the different role of expenditure amongst the other instruments supporting the policyin question, different arrangements can be envisaged in terms of mechanisms for selecting the actionsto be financed, allocation of resources, budgetary instruments and project management.
Glede na različne namene odhodkov, ki so eden od instrumentov za podporo zadevne politike, lahko Unija predvidi tudi druge ureditve v smislu mehanizmov za izbiro ukrepov, ki naj se financirajo, kot tudi v smislu dodeljevanja sredstev, proračunskih instrumentov in vodenja projektov.
There are, however, three considerations applicable across the board for the design and implementation of EU expenditure programmes.
Ob tem pa je treba na področju oblikovanja in izvajanja odhodkovnih programov vedno upoštevati trinačela, ki veljajo za vsa področja:
The choice of budgetary instruments must reflect the criteria of simplicity and consistency. Thereis a need to simplify, as far as possible, the budget structure, avoid duplication of instruments andprovide beneficiaries and partner managing authorities with a ‘one-stop-shop’.
Izbira proračunskih instrumentov mora upoštevati merili preprostosti in medsebojne skladnosti.Struktura proračuna mora biti čim bolj poenostavljena, izogibati se je potrebno podvajanju instrumentov, ter upravičencem in partnerskim organom upravljanja zagotoviti storitemestu“.
While keeping the political duty to define the strategic objectives and the frameworks of expenditure programmes, the Commission will limit the number of cases where it retains direct responsibility for their implementation and management.
Komisija bo ohranila politično dolžnost opredeljevanja strateških ciljev in vzpostavljanja okvirjev zaodhodkovne programe, hkrati pa bo omejila število primerov, v katerih ima neposredno odgovornost za njihovo izvajanje in vodenje.
Proportionality must be maintained between the amount of resources and the administrative burden related to their use.
Ohraniti je treba sorazmernost med obsegom sredstev in administrativno obremenitvijo, povezano z njihovo uporabo.
ENSURING THE OBJECTIVES ARE MET: INSTRUMENTS AND GOVERNANCE
ZAGOTAVLJANJE URESNIČEVANJA CILJEV: INSTRUMENTI IN UPRAVLJANJE
In light of the above, the Commission will apply the following principles.
V luči navedenega bo Komisija ravnala v skladu z naslednjimi načeli:
One instrument per policy area, one fund per programme.EU funding instruments will asfar as possible be consolidated and rationalised so that each policy arearesponsible for operational expenditure has a single funding instrumentcovering the full range of its interventions.Small budget lines will be consolidated into sections of the single funding instrument, even if aninstrument needs more than one legal base.
En instrument na politično področje, en sklad na program.Instrumenti financiranja EU bodočim bolj utrjeni in racionalizirani, tako da bo vsako politično področje, pristojno za operativne odhodke, imelo na voljo samo en instrument financiranja,ki bo pokrival celoten spekter intervencij. Majhne proračunske usmeritve bodo združene v večje dele enotnega instrumenta financiranja, tudi če instrument potrebuje več kot zgolj eno pravno podlago.
The Commission will consider alternatives to in-house direct management.A case-by-case assessment of policy- and cost-effectiveness should determine which actions should be:(a)managed directly by traditional core departments; (b) managed through offices or executive
Komisija bo pretehtala možne rešitve, ki bi lahko nadomestile neposredno notranje uprav-ljanje.Ocenjevanje vsakega posameznega primera politik in stroškovne učinkovitosti naj bi bilopodlaga za določitev, katere ukrepe naj bi (a) neposredno vodili tradicionalni glavni oddelki; (b) vo-
2 agencies (
2 dili uradi ali izvršilne agencije (
), both under the Commission’s control; (c) out-sourced to ‘classical’ agencies at EU level, functionally independent from the Commission; or (d) managed in a decentralised way inpartnership with Member States and/or regions.
), ki so pod nadzorom Komisije; (c) dodelili zunanjim "klasičnim" agencijam na ravni EU, ki so funkcionalno neodvisne od Komisije ali (d) vodili decentralizirano v partnerskem sodelovanju z državami članicami in/ali regijami.
The Commission has identified an overall approach on administrative governance, which willlead to streamlining and the selection of the most suitable and cost-effective delivery mechanism.
Komisija je opredelila splošni pristop administrativnega upravljanja, ki bo privedel do racionalizacije in izbire najustreznejšega in stroškovno najučinkovitejšega dostavnega mehanizma.
The full implementation of this approach, which is summarised in Annex 1, offers thepotential for benefits in terms of improved performance and greater efficiency, as well as a moreconsistent approach to the successful achievement of tasks of an executive nature.
Dosledno izvajanje tega pristopa, ki je povzet v Prilogi 1, ponuja veliko potencialnih koristi v smisluizboljšanega delovanja in večje učinkovitosti, hkrati pa je ta pristop doslednejši za nameneuspešnega uresničevanja nalog izvršilne narave.
The Commission will make detailed proposals for simplification in the following months on thebasis of the above principles. Some examples can be highlighted already for internal and external policies.
Komisija bo na podlagi teh načel v naslednjih mesecih podala pisne predloge za poenostavitev.Nekatere primere lahko že zdaj izpostavimo, in sicer v okviru notranjih in zunanjih politik:
•The next generation of cohesion policy programmes should be organised in such a way thateach individual programme is financed by a single fund, the ERDF or the ESF.
•Naslednja generacija programov kohezijske politike bi morala biti organizirana tako, da bi bilvsak posamezni program financiran iz enega samega sklada, bodisi iz Evropskega sklada zaregionalni razvoj (ESRR) ali iz Evropskega socialnega sklada (ESS).
In the Member States covered by the Cohesion Fund, simplification and consistency would be enhanced byprogramming the interventions in the same framework as those supported by the ERDF.
V državah članicah, ki jihpokriva Kohezijski sklad, bi bila lahko poenostavitev in usklajevanje pospešena s programskim oblikovanjem intervencij na podoben način, kot so podprte intervencije v okviru ESRR.
•All rural development measures will be regrouped for all regions (including the less developed Member States and regions) under a single funding, programming, financial managementand control system, with the same degree of concentration as at present on those regionscovered by convergence programmes.
•Vsi ukrepi, povezani z razvojem podeželja, bodo v vseh regijah (vključno z manj razvitimidržavami članicami in regijami) prerazporejeni na podlagi enotnega financiranja, programskega oblikovanja, sistema finančnega vodenja in nadzora, pri čemer bodo regije, ki jih pokrivajo programi za zbliževanje, deležne enake stopnje koncentracije, kot jim je trenutno namenjena.
•A new financial instrument for the environment would replace current environmental funding programmes.
•Nov finančni instrument za okolje bo nadomestil sedanje programe okoljskega financiranja.
(ii) In the area of external relations, a simplified architecture will be proposed, based onsix instruments, replacing more than 100 different instruments today.
(ii) Na področju zunanjih odnosov bo predlagana poenostavljena struktura, zasnovana našestih instrumentih, ki bodo nadomestili več kot 100 različnih instrumentov, ki se trenutnouporabljajo.
•Two new instruments (which could be merged at a later stage) will cover two fundamentalfunctions: economic cooperation and development on the one hand, peace and security onthe other hand.
•Dva nova instrumenta (ki ju je možno pozneje združiti) bosta pokrivala dve temeljni funkciji:na eni strani gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj, na drugi pa mir in varnost.
This should replace the existing plethora of geographic or thematically-basedinstruments and include the integration of the European Development Fund into the EUbudget.
To naj bi nadomestilo sedanjo množico zemljepisno ali tematsko opredeljenih instrumentov ter zajelo vključevanje Evropskega razvojnega sklada v proračun EU.
•A specific instrument for humanitarian aid should be maintained.
•Človekoljubno pomoč naj bi pokrival poseben instrument.
•A separate new neighbourhood instrument is needed aiming at crossborder cooperationbetween the enlarged EU and neighbouring countries.
•Treba je uvesti nov, ločen instrument za odnose s sosednjimi državami, ki bo usmerjen v čezmejno sodelovanje med razširjeno Unijo in njenimi sosedami.
•Macro-financial assistance would remain unchanged.
•Makrofinančna pomoč naj bi ostala nespremenjena.
Creating a new neighbourhood instrument
Oblikovanje novega instrumenta za odnose s sosednjimi državami
It is in the interest of the whole EU to avoid the emergence of new dividing lines on and around itsexternal borders and to promote stability and prosperity within and beyond these external borders.
V interesu celotne EU je, da se izogne nastajanju novih delitev na svojih zunanjih meja in v njihovi bližini ter da spodbuja stabilnost in blaginjo tako znotraj kot onkraj zunanjih meja.
Ajoined and united effort by the EU is vital to achieve this ambitious objective.
Skupna in poenotena prizadevanja EU so ključnega pomena za doseganje tega ambicioznega cilja.
Member States are notwell equipped to address this challenge on individual bases.
Države članice nimajo dovolj zmogljivosti, da bi se tega izziva lotile na lastno pest.
The new neighbourhood instrument(NNI) proposed by the Commission will focus, in particular, on promoting sustainable economic andsocial development of these border regions, ensuring the smooth functioning and secure management of the future external borders, addressing common challenges facing the EU and its neighbourslike environment, public health and the prevention of and fight against organised crime, and pursuing people to people cooperation between the EU Member States and their neighbours.
Pobuda, imenovana Instrument zanove sosede (INS), ki jo je predlagala Komisija, bo usmerjena predvsem v spodbujanje trajnostnegagospodarskega in socialnega razvoja obmejnih regij, kar bo zagotovilo tekoče delovanje in varno nadziranje prihodnjih zunanjih meja, hkrati pa ustvarilo podlago za spoprijem s skupnimi izzivi, s katerimi se soočajo tako EU kakor tudi njene sosede, kot so okolje, javno zdravje in preprečevanje organiziranega kriminala in boj proti njemu, ter spodbujalo ljudi, da krepijo sodelovanje med državami članicami EU in njihovimi sosedami.
The crossborder component of the new neighbourhood instrument would be implemented as simply as possible through a single legal instrument, building on the principles of existing European crossborder programmes — partnership, multiannual programming and co-financing.
Čezmejno komponento Instrumenta za nove sosede je treba čim prej uvesti na podlagi enega samega pravnega instrumenta, ki bo temeljil na načelih obstoječih evropskih čezmejnih programov – partnerstvu, večletnem programskem oblikovanju in sofinanciranju.
THE NEW FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK(2007–13)
NOVI FINANČNI OKVIR (2007–2013)
The period covered by the new financial framework must be long enough to provide a coherent coverage, within reasonable budget limits, for the complete phasing in of reformed Community policies and for the successful integration of 12 new Member States.
Obdobje, ki ga pokriva novi finančni okvir, mora biti dovolj dolgo, da zagotovi koherentno izvedbo, ki bo v razumnih proračunskih mejah pokrila celotno uvajanje reformiranih politik Skupnosti in uspešno vključevanje desetih novih držav.
The Commission as well as the Parliament has a five-year term.
Tako Komisija kot EP imata petletni mandat.
Future financial frameworksshould become more consistent with this institutional rhythm.
Bodoče finančne okvirje je treba bolj uskladiti s časovnimi okviri teh dveh institucij.
Each Commission would participate in the finalisation of a financial framework, part of which it then has to implement.
Vsaka sestava Komisije bi morala biti udeležena v zaključni fazi finančnega okvira, katerega del mora nato tudi izpeljati.
Basedon this experience, it would also be responsible for laying the ground for the following financialframework.
Na podlagi te izkušnje naj bi bila tudi odgovorna za pripravo podlage za naslednji finančni okvir.
The Parliament would authorise and follow up implementation of annual budgetsunder the financial framework it agreed upon.
Po drugi strani naj bi Parlamentodobril in naknadno spremljal izvrševanje letnih proračunov v skladu z dogovorjenim finančnimokvirom.
However, the Commission proposes transitionally a seven-year period extending from 2007 to2013 before moving to a normal five-year cycle.
Komisija je predlagala sedemletno prehodno obdobje od leta 2007 do leta 2013, in sicer predvstopom v običajni petletni cikel.
This would be necessary since the evolution ofmarket-related expenditure and direct payments in agriculture (EU-25) has been set until 2013and the current implementation of the Structural Funds as well as some adjustments on the sideof all institutions will take time to implement.
To bi bilo nujno, saj je načrt za odhodke, povezane s trgom, inneposredna plačila v kmetijstvu (EU-25) določen za obdobje do leta 2013, trenutno uvajanjestrukturnih sredstev ter nekatere prilagoditve v okviru vseh institucij pa bodo zahtevali čas zaizvedbo.
The current classification of expenditure in the financial perspective is to a large extent the legacy of the establishment of the first financial perspective and its successors.
Trenutna razporeditev odhodkov v finančni perspektivi je v veliki meri zapuščina prve finančneperspektive in njenih naslednic.
The current financialperspective is structured in eight expenditure headings, which become 11 when taking subheadings into account.
Sedanja finančna perspektiva je sestavljena iz osmih odhodkovnih postavk, če upoštevamo podpostavke, pa celo iz enajstih.
Ring-fencing of resources in a large number of headings and subheadings makes the system rigid and prevents proper adjustment and a more effective use ofresources to achieve the EU’s policy goals.
Umeščanje sredstev v okvir večjega števila postavk in podpostavk prispeva k togosti sistema in preprečuje ustrezno prilagajanje in učinkovitejšo porabo sredstev pri doseganju ciljev politik Unije.
The (however legitimate) objective of budgetary discipline overshadows the ultimate goal tohave budgetary means at the service of a political/economic objective.
Po drugi strani pa (legitimni) cilj proračunske discipline prevlada nad končnim ciljem sprostitveproračunskih sredstev v korist doseganja določenega političnega/gospodarskega cilja.
A more limited number of budgetary headings not only reflects the broad policy goals, but alsoprovides the necessary room for manoeuvre for developments that cannot always be preciselypredicted 10 years in advance.
Manjše število proračunskih postavk ne samo da odseva širše politične cilje, ampak zagotavljatudi manevrski prostor za odzivanje na dogodke, ki jih ne moremo vedno natančno napovedatideset let vnaprej.
For the new financial framework, the Commission proposes fivemain expenditure headings.
Komisija za nov finančni okvir predlaga pet glavnih odhodkovnih postavk:
A first heading aimed at enhancing competitiveness and cohesion for sustainable growthwith two sub-headings.
(1)Prva postavka je namenjena izboljšanju konkurenčnosti in kohezije za trajnostni razvoj invključuje dve podpostavki:
(a)Competitiveness for growth and employment. This sub-heading encompasses expenditurefor research and innovation; education and training; security and environmental sustainability of EU networks; support for an integrated single market and the accompanying policies; implementation of the social policy agenda.
1a) Konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje.Ta podpostavka pokriva odhodke za raziskave ininovacije; izobraževanje in usposabljanje; varnost in trajnostni razvoj omrežij EU v skladuz okoljem; podporo združenemu enotnemu trgu in pripadajočim politikam; uresničevanjeciljev socialne politike.
(b)Cohesion for growth and employment, with expenditure to enhance convergence of theleast developed Member States and regions, complements the EU strategy for sustain-
1b) Kohezija za rast in zaposlovanje, ki pokriva odhodke, namenjene zbliževanju najmanj razvitih držav članic in regij, dopolnjevanju strategije EU za trajnostni razvoj v območjih izven manj uspešnih regij in podpori medregionalnemu sodelovanju.
BUILDING OUR COMMON FUTURE• 2007–13 able development outside the less prosperous regions, and supports inter-regional cooperation.
GRADIMO NAO SKUPNO PRIHODNOST•2007–2013
4 related to the common agricultural and common fisheries policies (
4), bo ta postavka zajemala tudi odhodke, povezane z kmetijsko in skupno ribiško politiko (okoljem.
Citizenship, freedom, security and justiceincluding actions in the areas of freedom, justice and
(3)Državljanstvo, svoboda, varnost in pravica,ki zajema ukrepe na področju svobode, pravosod- ja in notranjih zadev, kakor tudi ukrepe na področju državljanstva (5
Commission administrative expenditure will be linked directly to operational expenditure,following the logic of activity-based management, which is already the basis for the establishment of the annual budget, and therefore included in the appropriations of each of theprevious four headings.
(5)Upravljalni stroški Komisije bodo neposredno povezani z operativnimi odhodki v skladu z logiko na dejavnostih temelječega upravljanja, ki je že podlaga za oblikovanje letnega proračuna, in je zato vključeno v odobrena proračunska sredstva v vsaki izmed prejšnjih štirih postavk.
A residual ‘Administration’ heading will remain to include expenditure for institutions other than the Commission, pensions and European schools.
Preostala postavka Upravljanjebo pokrivala sredstva za financiranje vseh institucij razen Komisije, pokojnin in evropskih šol.
Consistency and transparency call for the integration of the Solidarity Fund in the financialframework.
Usklajenost in preglednost zahtevata tudi vključitev Solidarnostnega sklada v finančni okvir.
This will be done by adding the Solidarity Fund and associated resources to the‘Cohesion’ (1b) heading.
Tapotreba po izpolnjena z razvrstitvijo Solidarnostnega sklada in pripadajočih virov pod postavko(1b), "kohezija".
As in the case of the emergency aid and loan guarantee reserves, tobe integrated under the heading ‘European Union as a global partner’, the new classificationwould not prejudge the corresponding budgetary procedures or the specific managementmethods.
Tako kot v primeru rezerv pomoči za nepričakovane dogodke in garancij za posojila, ki bodo vključeni v postavko Evropska unija kot globalni partner,naj nova razvrstitev nebi posegala v zadevne proračunske postopke ali specifične metode upravljanja.
Funds would be mobilised only when required.
Sredstva bi bila mobilizirana samo v primeru potrebe po njih.
Over a period extending 10 years from now till 2013, there should be a possibility to adjust thepriority setting defined by the roadmap within certain limits.
V desetletnem obdobju od letošnjega leta do leta 2013 mora obstajati možnost za prilagajanjeprednostnih nalog, opredeljenih v načrtu, znotraj določenih meja.
•The procedure to revise expenditure ceilings should remain the main instrument to allowadjustments to the financial framework when substantial and lasting changes in political priorities occur.
•Postopek revidiranja odhodkovnih pragov bi moral ostati poglavitni instrument, ki bi omogočal prilagoditve finančnega okvira v primeru občutnih ali trajnih sprememb prednostnih političnih nalog.
However, over the past decade the recourse to revisions has proven almostimpossible.
Vendar pa se je v zadnjem letu zatekanje k revizijam izkazalo za tako rekoč neizvedljivo.
This has contributed to the creation of various ad hoc instruments and arrangements over the years to meet new priorities or urgent demands.
To je skozi vsa leta prispevalo k uvajanju različnih priložnostnih instrumentov in ureditev, s ciljem izpolniti nove prednostne naloge ali nujne zahteve.
The Commission proposesan assessment of needs, e.g. in the form of a trilogue between Parliament, Council and the Commission ahead of the presentation of each preliminary draft budget.
Komisija predlaga izvedboocene potreb, npr. v obliki tristranskega dialogamed Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo, in sicer pred vsakokratno predstavitvijo predhodnega predloga proračuna.
•The annual budgetary procedure should allow for sufficient flexibility within the agreed financial framework to enable the Commission and the budgetary authority to react quickly toshort-term emergency crises or to unexpected political or economic events.
•Letni proračunski postopek bi moral ustvariti dovolj možnosti za prilagajanje znotraj dogovorjenega finančnega okvirja, da se lahko Komisija in organ za izvrševanje proračuna hitroodzoveta na kratkoročne krize ali nepričakovane politične ali gospodarske dogodke.
For the newfinancial framework, the Commission proposes a combination of existing instruments with anew reallocation flexibility to replace the existing ‘flexibility instrument’.
Za novfinančni okvir predlaga Komisija kombinacijo obstoječih instrumentov in nove prilagodljivosti za prerazporeditev sredstev,ki naj bi nadomestila obstoječi "instrument prilagoditve".
) EAGGF-Guidance and FIFG Funds currently included under the Structural Funds are transferred to this heading. However,the corresponding amounts transferred will continue to enter in the calculation of the 4 % ‘capping’ for Structural and Cohesion Funds for the new Member States.)
) To vključuje tudi varovanje meje in azilno politiko, krepitev civilne družbe, vzpostavitev institucij, dostop do javnih dob- rin, varnost prehrane, javno zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov, kulturo in avdiovizualni sektor, mladino, informiranje in dialogz državljani.