natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
We have therefore decided to cooperate to develop quality evaluation capacities, effective evaluation planning and an interconnected monitoring system.
Mnogi projekti obravnavajo horizontalne prednostne naloge šele v zadnji stopnji programiranja, kar v večini primerov pripelje do neustreznih in nenaravnih, prisiljenih ukrepov.
The representatives of the Polish Evaluation Unit were tasked with preparing the new meeting.
V pozni fazi programa je na voljo le še malo prostora za naravno vključevanje prednostnih nalog.
The first joint working meeting was held in Valtice, south Moravia (Czech Republic), on 2 and 3 December, marking the first anniversary of our Evaluation Unit. This meeting was also attended by representatives of the European Commission’s
> Eksplicitno in natančno opredeliti prednostne naloge Delno vrednotenje programa pa je pokazalo, da so horizontalne prednostne naloge pogosto slabo vključene v projekte, v primerjavi s cilji rasti, ki so bili bolj upoštevani.
An ‘electronic butler’ for the Structural Funds in Saxony-Anhalt
Če je bilo torej po eni strani lažje najti projekte, ki so se nanašali na okolje, enakost med moškimi in ženskami ali na socialno vključenost, je bilo po drugi strani veliko težje te iste teme vključiti v projekte za ekonomski razvoj.
The system permits data exchange and includes various modules corresponding to the different stages of project development: application processing, financial planning, input of the data needed for evaluation.
Gre za to, da horizontalnim prednostnim nalogam damo prav tolikšno pozornost kot drugim prednostnim nalogam programa.
The system also has the potential to be transferred to other European regions.’
Izkušnje kažejo, da dosežemo namen že, če horizontalne prednostne naloge izrecno vpišemo v načrt projekta.
‘For sustainable projects’
Natančna opredelitev poenostavi spremljanje uresničevanja ciljev in nam omogoča, da smo bolj zahtevni.
Fredrik Eliasson, Örebro County Administrative Board, Objective 2 programme for Eastern Sweden ting out in simple terms how they can include the horizontal priorities in their daily work.
Seveda se moramo izogniti temu, da bi te zahteve pomenile oviro, in zagotoviti, da upravičencem pomagajo pri upoštevanju horizontalnih prednostnih nalog in njihovega vliva na razvoj in rast njihove regije.
These are ‘horizontal’ areas of action, which means that they must be in-herent in the objectives and activities of any project that is financed. financed.
Vzroke lahko najdemo v štirih elementih: status prednostnih nalog; znanje in informacije o teh temah; njihova vključenost v projekte; njihova bolj ali manj natančna opredelitev.
However, I will refrain for now from attributing that to the good practices introduced in connection with the horizontal priorities.
> Trajnostni razvoj in razumevanje namena Ugotavljamo, da se cilj gospodarske rasti vedno bolj približuje cilju varovanja okolja.
‘Cohesion and the Lisbon strategy — The role of the regions’ conference
Če je splošno sprejeto dejstvo, da naj ima ekonomska rast kar najmanjši vpliv na okolje, želimo iti še dlje in doseči, da bi upravičenci do pomoči v skrbi za okolje videli vir sredstev, ki lahko pomaga njihovi dejavnosti.
If it is to realise its full potential, the strategy must be coupled with a policy of dynamic cohesion implemented throughout the Union and with the necessary resources at its disposal.
Projekti, ki imajo slab učinek na okolje, ne smejo prejeti nobene finančne pomoči, preprosto zato, ker škodijo dolgoročnemu razvoju.
> Attractiveness. This involves ‘combining growth and territorial cohesion by developing the potential of the single market, infrastructure and poles of innovation. In this respect, concentration of excellence must certainly not result in the exclusion of the least developed regions. On the contrary, these must be helped in attaining high levels of excellence’. > Knowledge. This constitutes ‘a powerful factor for integration benefiting individuals through education and training, and benefiting companies and markets through research and innovation’. > Jobs. The Member States are requested to ‘implement active policies aimed at the greatest possible inclusion in labour markets. Nobody must remain excluded from the world of work. In this respect, the creation of quality jobs must be one of our major priorities in the years to come’. Cohesion policy as a coefficient for ‘Lisbon’
> Izboljšati status horizontalnih prednostnih nalog Prva težava je v tem, da horizontalnim prednostnim nalogam ponavadi pripisujemo nižji status kot globalnim ciljem projekta, ki imajo neposreden vpliv na razvoj. Kot organ upravljanja sodimo, da si ta vprašanja zaslužijo več pozornosti. Vendar je treba to stališče prenesti tudi v javnost. Naši postopki vrednotenja namenjajo posebno pozornost projektom, ki dejansko upoštevajo horizontalne prednostne naloge. Projekti, ki ne predvidevajo aktivnega prispevka k vsaj eni prednostni nalogi, ne bodo več upravičeni do financiranja. financiranja. Ali naš pristop k horizontalnim prednostnim nalogam kaže rezultate?
The Lisbon strategy must draw inspiration from the partnerships between the national, local and social players that cohesion policy has put in place. It must benefit from regional dynamism and the know-how of cohesion policy in the field of governance.’
Upamo, da bodo prihodnja vrednotenja pokazala, da so priseljenci bolj vključeni v program, da upravičenci dojemajo okoljske zahteve kot dejavnike ekonomskega razvoja ali pa da pri projektih sodeluje enako število žensk in moških.
Mr Barroso thus appealed for ‘a voluntary agreement on the financial perspectives that awards cohesion its rightful place.
Že sedaj opažamo, da je odstotek žensk, ki zasedajo vodilna mesta v okviru podjetij, ustanovljenih s podporo strukturnih skladov, veliko višji kot odstotek v drugih podjetjih istega sektorja.
Without solidarity, without the idea of cohesion, there would no longer be a Union’.
Vendar v tem trenutku še nočem in ne morem trditi, da je to zasluga dobrih praks, ki smo jih vzpostavili na področju horizontalnih prednostnih nalog.
Citing the major challenges the Union faces — international competition, demographic change, disparities within the EU-25 — in his welcoming address European Commission President José Manuel Barroso restated the three key words for refocusing and relaunching the Lisbon strategy.
> Izboljšati znanje in informiranost Na področju okolja, enakosti med spoloma ali socialne vključenosti je težko sprejemati dobre odločitve, ne da bi razpolagali z ustreznim znanjem. Zato so bili upravitelji programa Cilja 2 za vzhodno Švedsko (kot to velja za večino drugih švedskih programov strukturnih skladov) seznanjeni s temi tematikami. Gre za to, da je vsak upravitelj sposoben predlagati konkretne rešitve nosilcem programov. Poleg tega smo izdelali vodnik, ki nosilcem projektov na preprost način pojasnjuje, kako naj horizontalne prednostne naloge vključijo v svoje vsakdanje delo. Stik: Fredrik.Eliasson@t.lst.se
Best practice in regional development inforegio panorama
Dobre prakse regionalnega razvoja inforegio panorama
Cooperation en at the heart of cohesion inforegio o
Sodelovanje sl v osrčju kohezije inforegio
Cooperation at the heart of cohesion
Sodelovanje v osrčju kohezije
The new Community strategic guidelines for cohesion, growth and jobs
Izziv sodelovanja in izkušnje programa Interreg za nove države članice ... in ostale
These guidelines will establish the priorities for the next generation of cohesion policy programmes by helping Member States to place the emphasis on key fields for growth and jobs.
Območje je bilo deležno hitrih in globokih sprememb. Izkušnje, ki so se nakopičile, rešitve, s katerimi so se srečevali na teh območjih v času intenzivnih sprememb, lahko koristijo vsem regijam Unije.
Cooperation at the heart of cohesion
Vmesna ocena programov Interreg III
Midterm evaluation of Interreg III
Reportaža: Interreg IIIA Francija/Španija –Nobena gora nas ne more ločiti
The INTERACT programme has carried out, for its managing authority, the Austrian Federal Chancellery, a study of the midterm evaluations of the Interreg Community initiative.
Ekonomska konvergenca dveh držav je skupaj s programi sodelovanja znatno prispevala k čezmejnim izmenjavam med Francijo in Španijo. To je težnja, ki ji Interreg daje okvir in dinamičnost.
Interreg IIIA in action: Italy–Switzerland, ‘Pamina’, Austria–Czech Republic, Ireland–Wales
Interreg IIIB v praksi: Alpsko območje, Severno obrobje, CADSES, Severozahodna Evropa
From the ground: Finland–Russia
Pričevanje: Konferenca obrobnih in pomorskih regij (CRPM)
Report: Interreg IIIA France–Spain — No mountain can divide us
Pričevanje: Italija
It is a trend that Interreg is stimulating.
Interreg IIIC v praksi: območja Sever, Jug, Zahod, INTERACT
Cover: Parachuting in the Czech Republic.Other contributors: Aiga Berke, Inge De Prins, Pierre Ergo, Véronique Faure, Jean-Luc Janot.Editor: Thierry Daman, European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional Policy.This magazine is printed in English and French on recycled paper.
Naslovnica: Jadralno padalstvo na Češkem.Sodelovali so še: Aiga Berke, Inge De Prins, Pierre Ergo, Véronique Faure, Jean-Luc Janot.Odgovorni urednik: Thierry Daman, Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za regionalno politiko.Ta revija je v angleški in francoski različici tiskana na recikliranem papirju.
The thematic dossier is available in 19 languages of the European Union at http://europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/index_en.htm
Tematski dokument je na voljo v 19 jezikih Evropske unije na spletni strani http://europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/index_fr.htm
The new Community strategic guidelines for cohesion, growth and jobs
Sodelovanje v osrčju kohezije
On 5 July, Commissioners Danuta Hübner (regional policy) and Vladimír Špidla (employment, social affairs and equal opportunities) presented a communication on the Community strategic guidelines for economic, social and
Izziv sodelovanja in izkušnje programa Interreg za nove države članice ... in ostale
The limited resources available to cohesion policy must be concentrated in those fields where they can produce the best results in terms of growth and jobs.
Srednja in vzhodna Evropa tvorita zemljepisno območje, kjer se bo sodelovanje od leta 2007 naprej še krepilo.
• promoting attractive conditions for businesses and their qualified staff;
Območje je bilo deležno hitrih in globokih sprememb.
• encouraging investments that help the EU to honour the Kyoto commitments;
Izkušnje, ki so se nakopičile, rešitve, s katerimi so se srečevali na teh območjih v času intenzivnih sprememb, lahko koristijo vsem regijam Unije.
(1) ‘Cohesion policy in support of growth and jobs — Community strategic guidelines, 2007–13’, COM(2005) 299 of 5 July 2005.(2) Sea transport links aimed at taking heavy goods vehicles off the roads and on to the sea.
posledica prestrukturiranja in vključevanja v tržno gospodarstvo.
• promoting entrepreneurship.
Na splošno so države članice iz srednje in vzhodne
The Commission will propose the guidelines for formal adoption by the Council and European Parliament as soon as the legislation on which the new cohesion policy is based has been adopted.
Cilji evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja, še zlasti pa aktualnih programov Interreg, močno presegajo strateške izbire posameznih držav članic.
In the meantime, public consultation will help determine the document’s final form.
Predstavljajo koncept razvoja, ki presega klasične regionalne razvojne strategije.
The start-up Absis IT Systems of Angleur (Belgium) received financial assistance from the ERDF.
Teritorialno sodelovanje je edinstvena značilnost regionalne politike.
) Innovation that contributes to management that respects the environment.
Za nekatere evropske regije je politični in gospodarski vložek pomembnejši od denarnih sredstev, ki gredo v ta namen.
Guideline III: More and better jobs
Teritorialno sodelovanje je edinstvena priložnost
They confirm the contribution of cities to growth and jobs, support the economic diversification of rural areas and strengthen crossborder, transnational and interregional cooperation.
Velik del srednje in vzhodne Evrope je vstopil v EU po petnajstih letih političnih in gospodarskih sprememb, ki so
> Improving the adaptability of workers and companies and the flexibility of the labour market. Member States are asked to: The guidelines do not seek to impose a uniform approach.
Evrope (baltske države, države Višegrajske skupine (2) in Slovenija), pa tudi bodoče članice in sosednje države na tem območju preživele več stoletij vojn in nenehnih političnih prevratov.
On the basis of the priorities set, each Member State or region must implement actions in line with its own development plan, taking into account its particular economic, social, institutional and cultural circumstances.
Izkusile so uspešna povezovanja, pa tudi razdore in so bile prisiljene v večletno izolacijo.
The guidelines require the unanimous approval of the Council after adoption of the regulations (following an agreement on the 2007–13 financial perspectives) and on the basis of a Commission proposal.
Te države se dobro zavedajo, kaj sta nacionalna in regionalna identiteta, saj so šele pred kratkim začele postopek prenove.
They will serve as a basis for the national strategic reference frameworks and for the corresponding operational programmes that will be adopted by the Commission.
Prav tako znajo ceniti koristi, ki jih prinaša sodelovanje.
• support good policy and programme design as well as monitoring, evaluation and impact assessment;• enhance administrative capacity in the delivery of policies and programmes.
Narode s tega območja druži boleča zgodovinska izkušnja, ki je po drugi strani ustvarila neko vrsto skupne usode.
Cooperation at the heart of cohesion
Za nove države članice je torej „novo sosedstvo“, predlog v okviru Evropske unije, izjemno dragoceno orodje za sodelovanje in razvoj.
Central and eastern Europe is a geographical area within which there will be even closer cooperation after 2007.
) Direktor enote Interreg Nacionalne madžarske agencije za regionalni razvoj (VÁTI Kht). VÁTI Kht, H-1016 Budapest, Gellérthegy utca 30/32.
They are also very aware of the potential benefits of cooperation.
E-pošta: csalagovits@pharereg.hu) Češka, Madžarska, Poljska, Slovaška.
Much of this experience is linked to implementing Phare CBC (cross-border cooperation) programmes and projects. In each of the new central and eastern European Member States, relatively large sums were allocated to crossborder programmes and a specific management structure was provided.
Sodelovanje v osrčju kohezije novih državah članicah srednje in vzhodne Evrope so bile čezmejnim programom namenjene razmeroma visoke vsote finančnih sredstev, vzpostavljena pa je bila tudi specifi č-na struktura upravljanja.
Phare CBC accounted for around 10 % of the annual Phare budget between 2002 and 2003.
Phare-CBC je predstavljal skoraj 10 % letnega proračuna Phare med 2000 in 2003.
Despite the obvious obstacles due to the different financial procedures between Interreg and Phare CBC, it proved possible to launch many integrated crossborder projects.
Kljub očitnim oviram zaradi razlik v postopkih fi nancira-nja med programi Interreg in Phare-CBC je bilo mogoče izvesti veliko število integriranih čezmejnih projektov.
The pre-accession participation of the new Member States in the Interreg IIA and IIIA crossborder programmes implemented on the EU-15 borders, and also in the Interreg IIC and IIIB transnational programmes, gave these countries the opportunity to acquire a good command of Interreg programme management.
Sodelovanje novih držav članic v čezmejnih programih Interreg IIA in IIIA, ki so se izvajali na mejnih območjih evropske petnajsterice pred priključitvijo novih članic, pa tudi sodelovanje v transnacionalnih programih Interreg IIC in IIIB je tem državam zagotovilo znanje za dobro upravljanje programov Interreg.
Cooperating with Latvia on maritime security.
Sodelovanje z Latvijo na področju pomorske varnosti
No doubt the greatest experience was acquired in the crossborder cooperation programmes, primarily due to the scale of the financial resources allocated.
Največ izkušenj so si nedvomno nabrale v programih čezmejnega sodelovanja, še zlasti zaradi velike količine dodeljenih finančnih sredstev.
This form of cooperation is by far the most appreciated at local and regional levels, in particular because crossborder partnerships are more concrete and based on a simpler and more direct relationship.
To obliko sodelovanja daleč najbolj cenijo lokalni in regionalni akterji, zlasti ker so čezmejna partnerstva bolj konkretna in temeljijo na preprostejših in bolj neposrednih odnosih.
Their results are also more visible.
Tudi rezultati so bolj otipljivi.
Although the inhabitants have retained their specific identity, central and eastern Europe has become a relatively homogenous area in political, economic and cultural terms.
Čeprav so narodi znali ohraniti svoje posebnosti, je vzhodno središče Evrope postalo razmeroma homogen prostor na političnem, gospodarskem in kulturnem področju.
The geographical area formed by the four countries of the Visegrad group and Slovenia is of particular signifi -cance as it constitutes the EU’s ‘eastern zone’ and in this part of Europe a great deal of attention is paid to cooperation, whether local, regional or national.
Zemljepisno območje, ki ga sestavljajo štiri države Višegrajske skupine in Slovenija, ima poseben pomen, saj uteleša „vzhod“ Unije. V tem delu Evrope namenjajo veliko pozornosti sodelovanju, tako na lokalni, regionalni kot na nacionalni ravni.
With the exception of Poland, the size of the new Member States is rather small. This means that many central and eastern European regions possess an external or an internal EU border and their development almost always includes an ‘international’ dimension.
Ker so nove države članice, razen Poljske, ozemeljsko razmeroma majhne, imajo številne regije srednje in vzhodne Evrope notranjo ali zunanjo mejo Unije, kar pomeni, da ima njihov razvoj vedno tudi „mednarodno“ razsežnost.
The eagerness of small countries to develop — plus the fact that the vast majority of local and regional development strategies take this factor into account — contributes greatly to the popularity of crossborder cooperation in this part of Europe.
Želja majhnih držav po razvoju, ob upoštevanju omenjene čezmejnosti v veliki večini strategij lokalnega in regionalnega razvoja, močno prispeva k popularnosti čezmejnega sodelovanja v tem delu Evrope.
Territorial cooperation in central and eastern Europe is popular partly because the programme objectives formulated are exactly what are needed to meet the present social and economic needs of these countries.
Teritorialno sodelovanje v srednji in vzhodni Evropi je zelo priljubljeno, ker se ujema s cilji programov in aktualnimi socialnimi in gospodarskimi potrebami teh držav.
On these eastern limits of the Union, territorial development is gradually becoming one of the key development criteria for countries whose political and economic environment has changed radically.
Teritorialni razvoj na „Vzhodu“ Unije postaja eden od ključnih kriterijev razvoja za države, katerih politično in gospodarsko okolje se je temeljito spremenilo.
Various critical evaluations confirm that the experience of cooperation to date has been positive and this is likely to facilitate the planning and implementation of future European programmes, especially if these programmes award priority to genuinely joint and integrated actions.
Različne kritične ocene kažejo, da so izkušnje sodelovanja do zdaj zelo pozitivne, kar bo olajšalo načrtovanje in izvajanje prihodnjih evropskih programov, še zlasti če bodo ti programi dejansko usmerjeni v povezane in integrirane aktivnosti.
Experience and best practice
Izkušnje in dobre prakse
The new Member States have more than a decade of experience with Interreg-type programmes on which they can now draw.
Velik del izkušenj je povezan z izvajanjem programov in projektov čezmejnega sodelovanja Phare-CBC.
8 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ N
4 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ Št. 17 _BAR_
Cooperation at the heart of cohesion
Sodelovanje v osrčju kohezije jektov.
Although the reputation of transnational cooperation programmes will never equal that of crossborder programmes among the local and regional actors, participation to date shows that the new Member States have understood the still largely unexploited strategic opportunities these transnational programmes offer.
Ti povezujejo v enoten okvir tako notranje instrumente Skupnosti za čezmejni razvoj (Interreg) kot tudi zunanje (Tacis in CARDS) evropske instrumente za čezmejni razvoj.
Central Europe and the Baltic States form one of the most rapidly developing macro-regions in the European Union.
Priljubljenost teh programov je bila do sedaj precejšnja, čeprav so bolj zapleteni zaradi razlik v zakonodajnih sistemih in načinih financiranja.
There is therefore no reason why these dynamic territories should not be effectively involved in transnational cooperation in the pertinent fields.
V okviru že potrjenih programov je bilo registriranih že več sto kandidatur, zelo pogosto za skupne projekte.
A need for the same kind of cooperation, but in different fields, is evident along the EU’s external borders, especially in the east and in the Balkans.
Programi sosedstva, zaradi svoje kompleksnosti, zahtevajo veliko mero prožnosti s strani sodelujočih.
and are supporting the initiation of joint projects.
Čeprav sloves programov transnacionalnega sodelovanja pri lokalnih in regionalnih akterjih ne bo nikoli dosegel slovesa, ki ga imajo čezmejni programi, pa dosedanje sodelovanje kaže, da so nove države članice uvidele še neizkoriščene strateške priložnosti, ki jih skrivajo transnacionalni programi.
These incorporate in a common device both the internal (Interreg) and external (Tacis, CARDS neighbourhood components) European crossborder development instruments.
Srednja Evropa in Baltik spadata med velike regijske skupnosti Evropske unije, ki se najhitreje razvijajo.
Several hundred applications have already been submitted for programmes already approved, many of them for joint projects.
Ta dinamična ozemlja bi morala zatorej učinkovito pristopiti k transnacionalnemu sodelovanju na ustreznih področjih.
Because of their complexity, neighbourhood programmes require a lot of flexibility from the parties involved, but after initial experience and with the necessary additional resources, they can provide a solid foundation for the integrated programmes of the subsequent programming period.
Potreba po tovrstnem sodelovanju, vendar na drugih področjih, pa je prisotna tudi vzdolž zunanjih meja Unije, zlasti na vzhodu in na Balkanu.
Participation in interregional cooperation projects has made it possible for several central and eastern European regions to be involved directly in the exchange of experiences at European level.
Udeležba v projektih medregionalnega sodelovanja je mnogim regijam srednje in vzhodne Evrope omogočila neposredno vključitev v izmenjave izkušenj na evropski ravni.
This is already contributing to the success and effectiveness of the Objective 1 programmes currently being implemented in the new Member States.
To ugodno vpliva tudi na potek programov Cilja 1, ki so trenutno v teku v novih državah članicah.
The expansion and thematic concentration of territorial cooperation at European level would signify additional progress for territorial cooperation.
Širitev in tematska koncentracija medregionalnega sodelovanja na evropski ravni bi lahko dodatno spodbudili teritorialno sodelovanje.
It is in the initiation and implementation of joint projects that territorial cooperation can fully manifest itself.
V novih državah članicah trenutno poteka tudi določeno število novih programov sosedstva, ki jih je na področjih vzdolž zunanjih mej Unije sprožila Komisija. Veliko teh no-
Previously, for certain regions, the divergent national administrative and financial regulations often tended to limit opportunities to launch and implement projects of this kind.
V nekaterih regijah je razlika med nacionalnimi administrativnimi in finančnimi pravili pogosto ovirala možnost vzpostavljanja in izvajanja takšnih programov.