natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With regard to the third paragraph, it should be noted that in accordance with the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, provision should be made for legal aid where the absence of such aid would make it impossible to ensure an effective remedy (ECHR judgment of 9 October 1979, Airey, Series A, Volume 32, p. 11).
V zvezi s tretjim odstavkom je treba opozoriti na dejstvo, da je treba v skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice poskrbeti za pravno pomoč, če bi bilo v primeru, da takšne pomoči ni, nemogoče zagotoviti učinkovito pravno sredstvo (sodba EKČP z dne 9. oktobra 1979 v zadevi Airey, serija A, zvezek 32, str. 11).
Explanation on Article 48 — Presumption of innocence and right of defence
Pojasnilo k členu 48 – Domneva nedolžnosti in pravica do obrambe
Article 48 is the same as Article 6(2) and(3) of the ECHR, which reads as follows:
Člen 48 je enak drugemu in tretjemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP, ki se glasi:
Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:
Kdor je obdolžen kaznivega dejanja, ima naslednje minimalne pravice:
(b) to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;
(b) da ima primeren čas in možnosti za pripravo svoje obrambe;
(c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;
(c) da se brani sam ali z zagovornikom po lastni izbiri ali če nima dovolj sredstev za plačilo zagovornika, da ga dobi brezplačno, če to zahtevajo interesi pravičnosti;
(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;
(d) da zaslišuje oziroma zahteva zaslišanje obremenilnih prič in da doseže navzočnost in zaslišanje razbremenilnih prič ob enakih pogojih, kot veljajo za obremenilne priče;
(e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.’
(e) da ima brezplačno pomoč tolmača, če ne razume ali ne govori jezika, ki se uporablja pred sodiščem.“
In accordance with Article 52(3), this right has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR.
V skladu s členom 52(3) imata pravica enak pomen in področje uporabe kot pravica, zagotovljena z EKČP.
Explanation on Article 49 — Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties
Pojasnilo k členu 49 – Načeli zakonitosti in sorazmernosti kaznivih dejanj in kazni
There has been added the rule of the retroactivity of a more lenient penal law, which exists in a number of Member States and which features in Article 15 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Dodano je bilo pravilo retroaktivnosti milejšega kazenskega zakona, ki obstaja v številnih državah članicah in je podano v 15. členu Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah.
This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations.’
Ta člen ni ovira za sojenje in kaznovanje oseb za kako storitev ali opustitev, ki je bila v času, ko je bila storjena, kazniva po splošnih pravnih načelih, ki jih priznavajo civilizirani narodi.“
In paragraph 2, the reference to ‘civilised’ nations has been deleted; this does not change the meaning of this paragraph, which refers to crimes against humanity in particular.
V odstavku 2 je črtana beseda „civilizirani“; to ne spreminja pomena tega odstavka, ki se nanaša predvsem na zločine zoper človeštvo.
In accordance with Article 52(3), the right guaranteed here therefore has the same meaning and scope as the right guaranteed by the ECHR.
V skladu s členom 52(3) ima tukaj zagotovljena pravica torej enak pomen in obseg kot pravica, zagotovljena z EKČP.
Paragraph 3 states the general principle of proportionality between penalties and criminal offences which is enshrined in the common constitutional traditions of the Member States and in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the Communities.
Odstavek 3 podaja splošno načelo sorazmernosti kaznivih dejanj in kazni, ki je utemeljeno z ustavnimi tradicijami, skupnimi vsem državam članicam, in s sodno prakso Sodišča Skupnosti.
Explanation on Article 50 — Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence
Pojasnilo k členu 50 – Pravica, da se za isto kaznivo dejanje kazensko ne preganja ali kaznuje dvakrat
Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the ECHR reads as follows:
4. člen Protokola št. 7 k EKČP se glasi:
No derogation from this Article shall be made under Article 15 of the Convention.’
Določila tega člena se ne smejo derogirati s sklicevanjem na 15. člen Konvencije.“
The rule prohibiting cumulation refers to cumulation of two penalties of the same kind, that is to say criminal-law penalties.
Pravilo o prepovedi kumulacije se nanaša na kumulacijo dveh kazni enake vrste, v tem primeru kazni, izrečene na kazenskem sodišču.
In accordance with Article 50, the ‘non bis in idem’ rule applies not only within the jurisdiction of one State but also between the jurisdictions of several Member States.
V skladu s členom 50 se pravilo „non bis in idem“ ne uporablja zgolj v okviru sodne pristojnosti ene države, temveč tudi v okviru sodne pristojnosti več držav članic.
The very limited exceptions in those Conventions permitting the Member States to derogate from the ‘non bis in idem’ rule are covered by the horizontal clause in Article 52(1) of the Charter concerning limitations.
Zelo omejene izjeme v navedenih konvencijah, ki državam članicam omogočajo izjemo od pravila „non bis in idem“, so določene s horizontalno klavzulo člena 52(1) Listine o omejitvah.
As regards the situations referred to by Article 4 of Protocol No 7, namely the application of the principle within the same Member State, the guaranteed right has the same meaning and the same scope as the corresponding right in the ECHR.
Kar zadeva primere iz 4. člena Protokola št. 7 EKČP, tj. uporabo načela v isti državi članici, ima zagotovljena pravica enak pomen in obseg kot ustrezna pravica v EKČP.
TITLE VII — GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE CHARTER
NASLOV VII – SPLOŠNE DOLOČBE O RAZLAGI IN UPORABI LISTINE
Explanation on Article 51 — Field of application
Pojasnilo k členu 51 – Področje uporabe
The aim of Article 51 is to determine the scope of the Charter.
Namen člena 51 je opredeliti področje uporabe Listine.
It seeks to establish clearly that the Charter applies primarily to the institutions and bodies of the Union, in compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.
Prizadeva si jasno določiti, da se Listina ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti najprej uporablja za institucije in organe Unije.
This provision was drafted in keeping with Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, which required the Union to respect fundamental rights, and with the mandate issued by the Cologne European Council.
Ta določba je bila sestavljena v skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki od Unije zahteva, da upošteva temeljne pravice, in v skladu z mandatom, podeljenim v okviru Evropskega sveta v Kölnu.
The term ‘institutions’ is enshrined in the Treaties.
Izraz „institucije“ je določen v pogodbah.
The expression ‘bodies, offices and agencies’ is commonly used in the Treaties to refer to all the authorities set up by the Treaties or by secondary legislation (see, e.g., Articles 15 or 16 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union).
V pogodbah se izraz „organi, uradi in agencije“ navadno uporablja za označevanje vseh teles, ustanovljenih s pogodbama ali sekundarno zakonodajo (glej npr. člen 15 ali 16 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije).
Of course this rule, as enshrined in this Charter, applies to the central authorities as well as to regional or local bodies, and to public organisations, when they are implementing Union law.
I-2737, točka 37). Seveda se to pravilo, utemeljeno v tej listini, uporablja za centralne organe in regionalne ali lokalne organe ter za javne organizacije pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije.
Paragraph 2, together with the second sentence of paragraph 1, confirms that the Charter may not have the effect of extending the competences and tasks which the Treaties confer on the Union.
Odstavek 2 skupaj z drugim stavkom odstavka 1 potrjuje, da Listina ne more povzročiti širitve pristojnosti in nalog, ki so s pogodbama dodeljene Uniji.
Explicit mention is made here of the logical consequences of the principle of subsidiarity and of the fact that the Union only has those powers which have been conferred upon it.
Gre zato, da se izrecno navedejo logične posledice, ki izhajajo iz načela subsidiarnosti in dejstva, da ima Unija samo tiste pristojnosti, ki so ji bile dodeljene.
The fundamental rights as guaranteed in the Union do not have any effect other than in the context of the powers determined by the Treaties.
Temeljne pravice, zagotovljene v Uniji, učinkujejo le v okviru pristojnosti, določenih v pogodbah.
Consequently, an obligation, pursuant to the second sentence of paragraph 1, for the Union's institutions to promote principles laid down in the Charter may arise only within the limits of these same powers.
Zato lahko obveznost institucij Unije, da v skladu z drugim stavkom odstavka 1 spodbujajo načela, podana v Listini, obstaja le v mejah teh pristojnosti.
Paragraph 2 also confirms that the Charter may not have the effect of extending the field of application of Union law beyond the powers of the Union as established in the Treaties.
Odstavek 2 tudi potrjuje, da Listina ne more povzročiti širitve področja uporabe prava Unije preko njenih pristojnosti, določenih v pogodbah.
The Court of Justice has already established this rule with respect to the fundamental rights recognised as part of Union law (judgment of 17 February 1998, C-249/96 Grant [1998] ECR I-621, paragraph 45 of the grounds).
Sodišče je že opredelilo to pravilo v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami, ki se štejejo kot del prava Unije (sodba z dne 17. februarja 1998 v zadevi Grant, C-249/96, rec. 1998, str.
In accordance with this rule, it goes without saying that the reference to the Charter in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union cannot be understood as extending by itself the range of Member State action considered to be ‘implementation of Union law’ (within the meaning of paragraph 1 and the above-mentioned case-law).
I-621, točka 45). V skladu s tem pravilom je samoumevno, da sklicevanje na Listino v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ne more samo po sebi pomeniti širitve obsega ukrepov držav članic, ki se štejejo kot „izvajanje prava Unije“ (v smislu odstavka 1 in zgoraj navedene sodne prakse).
Explanation on Article 52 — Scope and interpretation of rights and principles
Pojasnilo k členu 52 – Obseg pravic in načel ter njihova razlaga
Paragraph 1 deals with the arrangements for the limitation of rights.
Odstavek 1 obravnava podrobnosti glede omejevanja pravic.
The wording is based on the case-law of the Court of Justice: ‘... it is well established in the case-law of the Court that restrictions may be imposed on the exercise of fundamental rights, in particular in the context of a common organisation of the market, provided that those restrictions in fact correspond to objectives of general interest pursued by the Community and do not constitute, with regard to the aim pursued, disproportionate and unreasonable interference undermining the very substance of those rights’ (judgment of 13 April 2000, Case C-292/97, paragraph 45 of the grounds).
Besedilo temelji na sodni praksi Sodišča: „... skladno z ustaljeno sodno prakso Sodišča je mogoče uvesti omejitve pri uresničevanju temeljnih pravic, zlasti v okviru skupne ureditve trga, pod pogojem, da navedene omejitve dejansko ustrezajo ciljem splošnega interesa, za katere se zavzema Skupnost, in da glede na želeni cilj ne povzročajo čezmernega in neutemeljenega poseganja, ki bi ogrožalo samo bistvo navedenih pravic“ (sodba z dne 13. aprila 2000, C-292/97, točka 45).
The reference to general interests recognised by the Union covers both the objectives mentioned in Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union and other interests protected by specific provisions of the Treaties such as Article 4(1) of the Treaty on European Union and Articles 35(3), 36 and 346 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sklicevanje na splošne interese, ki jih priznava Unija, zajema cilje iz člena 3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in druge interese, ki so zaščiteni s posebnimi določbami pogodb, na primer členom 4(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ter členi 35(3), 36 in 346 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Paragraph 2 refers to rights which were already expressly guaranteed in the Treaty establishing the European Community and have been recognised in the Charter, and which are now found in the Treaties (notably the rights derived from Union citizenship).
Odstavek 2 se nanaša na pravice, ki jih že izrecno zagotavlja Pogodba ES in priznava Listina in se sedaj nahajajo v pogodbah (predvsem pravice, ki izhajajo iz državljanstva Unije).
It clarifies that such rights remain subject to the conditions and limits applicable to the Union law on which they are based, and for which provision is made in the Treaties.
Pojasnjuje, da za takšne pravice še nadalje veljajo pogoji in omejitve, ki se uporabljajo za pravo Unije, na katerem te pravice temeljijo, in ki so sedaj predvideni v pogodbah.
The Charter does not alter the system of rights conferred by the EC Treaty and taken over by the Treaties.
Listina ne spreminja sistema pravic, ki so bile dodeljene s Pogodbo ES in so sedaj povzete v pogodbah.
Paragraph 3 is intended to ensure the necessary consistency between the Charter and the ECHR by establishing the rule that, in so far as the rights in the present Charter also correspond to rights guaranteed by the ECHR, the meaning and scope of those rights, including authorised limitations, are the same as those laid down by the ECHR.
Namen odstavka 3 je zagotoviti potrebno usklajenost med Listino in EKČP z vzpostavitvijo pravila, da sta vsebina in obseg navedenih pravic, vključno z dovoljenimi omejitvami, enaka kot vsebina in pomen pravic, ki ju določa EKČP, kolikor pravice v tej listini ustrezajo tudi pravicam, zagotovljenim z EKČP.
This means in particular that the legislator, in laying down limitations to those rights, must comply with the same standards as are fixed by the detailed limitation arrangements laid down in the ECHR, which are thus made applicable for the rights covered by this paragraph, without thereby adversely affecting the autonomy of Union law and of that of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
To zlasti pomeni, da mora zakonodajalec pri določanju omejitev navedenih pravic upoštevati enaka merila, kot so določena v podrobni ureditvi o omejitvah iz EKČP, ki tako postanejo veljavna za pravice, zajete v tem odstavku, ne da bi to škodilo avtonomiji prava Unije in Sodišča Evropske unije.
The meaning and the scope of the guaranteed rights are determined not only by the text of those instruments, but also by the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Vsebina in obseg zagotovljenih pravic nista določena le z besedilom navedenih aktov, temveč tudi s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije.
In any event, the level of protection afforded by the Charter may never be lower than that guaranteed by the ECHR.
V vsakem primeru raven varstva, ki jo zagotavlja Listina, ne sme biti nižja od ravni, ki jo zagotavlja EKČP.
The Charter does not affect the possibilities of Member States to avail themselves of Article 15 ECHR, allowing derogations from ECHR rights in the event of war or of other public dangers threatening the life of the nation, when they take action in the areas of national defence in the event of war and of the maintenance of law and order, in accordance with their responsibilities recognised in Article 4(1) of the Treaty on European Union and in Articles 72 and 347 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Listina ne vpliva na možnost držav članic, da uporabijo 15. člen EKČP, ki dovoljuje odstopanje od pravic, predvidenih v EKČP, v primeru vojne ali druge splošne nevarnosti, ki ogroža življenje naroda, če sprejmejo ukrepe na področju nacionalne obrambe v primeru vojne ali na področju vzdrževanja javnega reda in miru v skladu s svojimi obveznostmi iz člena 4(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter členov 347 in 72 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The list of rights which may at the present stage, without precluding developments in the law, legislation and the Treaties, be regarded as corresponding to rights in the ECHR within the meaning of the present paragraph is given hereafter.
Seznam pravic, za katere bi lahko v sedanji fazi – brez izključitve razvoja na področju prava, zakonodaje in pogodb – veljalo, da ustrezajo pravicam v EKČP v smislu tega odstavka, je podan v nadaljevanju.
It does not include rights additional to those in the ECHR.
Seznam ne vključuje pravic, ki so dodane pravicam v EKČP.
Article 2 corresponds to Article 2 of the ECHR,
— člen 2 ustreza 2. členu EKČP;
Article 4 corresponds to Article 3 of the ECHR,
— člen 4 ustreza 3. členu EKČP;
Article 5(1) and (2) corresponds to Article 4 of the ECHR,
— člen 5(1) in (2) ustreza 4. členu EKČP;
Article 6 corresponds to Article 5 of the ECHR,
— člen 6 ustreza 5. členu EKČP;
Article 7 corresponds to Article 8 of the ECHR,
— člen 7 ustreza 8. členu EKČP;
Article 10(1) corresponds to Article 9 of the ECHR,
— člen 10(1) ustreza 9. členu EKČP;
Article 11 corresponds to Article 10 of the ECHR without prejudice to any restrictions which Union law may impose on Member States' right to introduce the licensing arrangements referred to in the third sentence of Article 10(1) of the ECHR,
— člen 11 ustreza 10. členu EKČP brez poseganja v omejitve, ki jih lahko pravo Unije nalaga državam članicam glede možnosti uvajanja dovoljenj iz tretjega stavka prvega odstavka 10. člena EKČP;
Article 17 corresponds to Article 1 of the Protocol to the ECHR,
— člen 17 ustreza 1. členu Protokola k EKČP;
Article 19(1) corresponds to Article 4 of Protocol No 4,
— člen 19(1) ustreza 4. členu Protokola št. 4;
Article 19(2) corresponds to Article 3 of the ECHR as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights,
— člen 19(2) ustreza 3. členu EKČP, kakor ga razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice;
Article 48 corresponds to Article 6(2) and(3) of the ECHR,
— člen 48 ustreza drugemu in tretjemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP;
Article 49(1) (with the exception of the last sentence) and (2) correspond to Article 7 of the ECHR.
— člen 49(1) (razen zadnjega stavka) in (2) ustreza 7. členu EKČP.
Articles where the meaning is the same as the corresponding Articles of the ECHR, but where the scope is wider:
Členi, katerih pomen je sicer enak kot pomen ustreznih členov EKČP, njihovo področje uporabe pa je širše:
Article 9 covers the same field as Article 12 of the ECHR, but its scope may be extended to other forms of marriage if these are established by national legislation,
— člen 9 zajema enako področje kot 12. člen EKČP, vendar se lahko njegovo področje uporabe razširi na druge vrste sklepanja zakonske zveze, če slednje predvideva nacionalna zakonodaja;
Article 12(1) corresponds to Article 11 of the ECHR, but its scope is extended to European Union level,
— člen 12(1) ustreza 11. členu EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi na raven Evropske unije;
Article 14(1) corresponds to Article 2 of the Protocol to the ECHR, but its scope is extended to cover access to vocational and continuing training,
— člen 14(1) ustreza 2. členu Protokola k EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi, tako da zajema dostop do poklicnega in nadaljnjega usposabljanja;
Article 14(3) corresponds to Article 2 of the Protocol to the ECHR as regards the rights of parents,
— člen 14(3) ustreza 2. členu Protokola k EKČP, kar zadeva pravice staršev;
Article 47(2) and(3) corresponds to Article 6(1) of the ECHR, but the limitation to the determination of civil rights and obligations or criminal charges does not apply as regards Union law and its implementation,
— člen 47(2) in (3) ustreza prvemu odstavku 6. člena EKČP, vendar omejitev na odločanje o civilnih pravicah in obveznostih ali o kazenskih obtožbah ne velja, kar zadeva pravo Unije in njegovo izvajanje;
Article 50 corresponds to Article 4 of Protocol No 7 to the ECHR, but its scope is extended to European Union level between the Courts of the Member States,
— člen 50 ustreza 4. členu Protokola št. 7 k EKČP, vendar se njegovo področje uporabe razširi na raven Evropske unije in velja med sodišči držav članic;
Finally, citizens of the European Union may not be considered as aliens in the scope of the application of Union law, because of the prohibition of any discrimination on grounds of nationality.
— končno se državljani Evropske unije v okviru področja uporabe prava Unije ne smejo obravnavati kot tujci, in sicer zaradi prepovedi vsakršne diskriminacije glede na državljanstvo.
The limitations provided for by Article 16 of the ECHR as regards the rights of aliens therefore do not apply to them in this context.
Zanje se omejitve, predvidene v 16. členu EKČP v zvezi s pravicami tujcev, v tem okviru ne uporabljajo.
According to that distinction, subjective rights shall be respected, whereas principles shall be observed (Article 51(1)).
V skladu s tem razlikovanjem je treba pravice posameznikov spoštovati, medtem ko je treba načela upoštevati (člen 51(1)).
Principles may be implemented through legislative or executive acts (adopted by the Union in accordance with its powers, and by the Member States only when they implement Union law); accordingly, they become significant for the Courts only when such acts are interpreted or reviewed.
Načela se lahko izvajajo z zakonodajnimi ali izvedbenimi akti (sprejetimi s strani Unije v okviru njenih pristojnosti in s strani držav članic samo pri njihovem izvajanju prava Unije); za sodišča postanejo torej pomembna šele pri razlagi ali reviziji teh aktov.
They do not however give rise to direct claims for positive action by the Union's institutions or Member States authorities.
Vendar niso razlog za neposredne zahteve po pozitivnem ukrepanju institucij Unije ali organov držav članic.
For illustration, examples for principles, recognised in the Charter include e.g. Articles 25, 26 and 37.
Tako na primer spadajo k načelom, priznanim v Listini, členi 25, 26 in 37.
In some cases, an Article of the Charter may contain both elements of a right and of a principle, e.g. Articles 23, 33 and 34.
V nekaterih primerih lahko člen Listine vsebuje značilnosti pravice in načela, kot npr. členi 23, 33 in 34.
Paragraph 6 refers to the various Articles in the Charter which, in the spirit of subsidiarity, make reference to national laws and practices.
Odstavek 6 se nanaša na razne člene v Listini, ki se v duhu subsidiarnosti sklicujejo na nacionalne predpise in običaje.
Explanation on Article 53 — Level of protection
Pojasnilo k členu 53 – Raven varstva
This provision is intended to maintain the level of protection currently afforded within their respective scope by Union law, national law and international law.
Namen te določbe je ohraniti raven varstva, ki jo na svojih področjih uporabe trenutno zagotavljajo pravo Unije, pravo držav članic in mednarodno pravo.
Explanation on Article 54 — Prohibition of abuse of rights
Pojasnilo k členu 54 – Prepoved zlorabe pravic
‘Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the Convention.’.
„Nobene določbe v tej Konvenciji ni mogoče razlagati tako, kot da vsebuje za katerokoli državo, skupino ali posameznika pravico do kakršnekoli dejavnosti ali dejanja, ki je usmerjeno h kršenju katerihkoli pravic ali svoboščin, ki so tu določene, ali k njihovemu omejevanju v večjem obsegu, kot je določeno v tej Konvenciji.“