natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
After they have ceased to hold office, they shall continue to enjoy immunity in respect of acts performed by them in their official capacity, including words spoken or written.
Po prenehanju mandata še naprej uživajo imuni­teto za svoja dejanja, storjena pri opravljanju uradnih dolžnosti, vključno z izgovorjenimi ali zapi­sanimi besedami.
Where immunity has been waived and criminal proceedings are instituted against a Judge, he shall be tried, in any of the Member States, only by the court competent to judge the members of the highest national judiciary.
Če je bila sodniku odvzeta imuniteta in je proti njemu sprožen kazenski postopek, mu sme soditi v kateri koli državi članici le sodišče, pristojno za sojenje sodnikom, ki pripadajo najvišji sodni oblasti v državi.
Article 4 The Judges may not hold any political or administrative office.
Člen 4 Sodniki ne smejo opravljati političnih ali upravnih funkcij.
Article 5 Apart from normal replacement, or death, the duties of a Judge shall end when he resigns.
Člen 5 Razen ob redni zamenjavi ali smrti dolžnosti sodnika prenehajo z njegovim odstopom.
Upon this notification a vacancy shall arise on the bench.
Z uradnim obvestilom slednjemu se mesto izprazni.
If the person concerned is a member of the General Court or of a specialised court, the Court shall decide after consulting the court concerned.
Če je ta član Splošnega sodišča ali specializiranega sodišča, Sodišče odloči po posvetovanju z zadevnim sodiščem.
In the case of a decision depriving a Judge of his office, a vacancy shall arise on the bench upon this latter notification.
V primeru odločitve o razrešitvi sodnika se mesto z uradnim obvestilom predsedniku Sveta izprazni.
A Judge who is to replace a member of the Court whose term of office has not expired shall be appointed for the remainder of his predecessor’s term.
Sodnik, katerega dolžnosti prenehajo pred iztekom njegovega mandata, je nadomeščen za preostanek mandata.
Article 8 The provisions of Articles 2 to 7 shall apply to the Advocates-General.
Člen 8 Določbe členov 2 do 7 se uporabljajo za generalne pravobranilce.
When, every three years, the Judges are partially replaced, 14 and 13 Judges shall be replaced alternately.
Ko se vsaka tri leta izvede delna zamenjava sodnikov, se izmenično zamenja štirinajst in trinajst sodnikov.
Article 11
Člen 11 Sodišče poskrbi za nadomeščanje sodnega tajnika, kadar je ta zadržan.
At the request of the Court of Justice, the European Parliament and the Council may, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, provide for the appointment of Assistant Rapporteurs and lay down the rules governing their service.
Na zahtevo Sodišča lahko Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku predvidita imenovanje pomožnih poročevalcev in določita pravila, ki urejajo njihov položaj.
The Assistant Rapporteurs may be required, under conditions laid down in the Rules of Procedure, to participate in preparatory inquiries in cases pending before the Court and to cooperate with the Judge who acts as Rapporteur.
Pod pogoji, določe­nimi v poslovniku, lahko pomožni poročevalci sodelujejo pri pripravljalnih poizvedbah v postopkih, ki tečejo pred Sodiščem, in sodelujejo s sodnikom poročevalcem.
The duration of the judicial vacations shall be determined by the Court with due regard to the needs of its business.
Trajanje sodnih počitnic določi Sodišče ob upoštevanju potreb svojega poslo­vanja.
The Court shall sit as a full Court where cases are brought before it pursuant to Article 228(2), Article 245(2), Article 247 or Article 286(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Sodišče zaseda na občni seji, kadar so mu predložene zadeve v skladu s členi 228(2), 245(2), 247 ali 286(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Moreover, where it considers that a case before it is of exceptional importance, the Court may decide, after hearing the Advocate-General, to refer the case to the full Court.
Poleg tega lahko Sodišče, če meni, da je zadeva izjemnega pomena, po nastopu generalnega prav­obranilca odloči, da se zadeva predloži na občno sejo.
Article 17
Člen 17 Sodišče lahko veljavno odloča le v sestavi lihega števila sodnikov.
Decisions of the full Court shall be valid only if 15 Judges are sitting.
Odločitve občne seje so veljavne le, če je navzočih petnajst sodnikov.
In the event of one of the Judges of a chamber being prevented from attending, a Judge of another chamber may be called upon to sit in accordance with conditions laid down in the Rules of Procedure.
Če je eden od sodnikov senata zadržan, se lahko pod pogoji, določenimi v poslovniku, pozove v senat sodnik iz drugega senata.
University teachers being nationals of a Member State whose law accords them a right of audience shall have the same rights before the Court as are accorded by this Article to lawyers.
Univerzitetni profesorji, ki so državljani držav članic, katerih zakonodaja jim priznava pravico zasto­panja na sodišču, uživajo pred Sodiščem enake pravice, kot jih ta člen priznava odvetnikom.
Article 20 The procedure before the Court of Justice shall consist of two parts: written and oral.
Člen 20 Postopek pred Sodiščem ima dva dela, pisnega in ustnega.
The written procedure shall consist of the communication to the parties and to the institutions of the Union whose decisions are in dispute, of applications, statements of case, defences and observations, and of replies, if any, as well as of all papers and documents in support or of certified copies of them.
Pisni postopek zajema posredovanje tožb, navedb o zadevi, odgovorov na tožbo in izjav, pa tudi morebitnih replik kot tudi vseh dokazil in dokumentov, ki to podpirajo, ali njihovih overjenih kopij, strankam in tistim institucijam Unije, katerih odločitve so predmet spora.
The oral procedure shall consist of the reading of the report presented by a Judge acting as Rapporteur, the hearing by the Court of agents, advisers and lawyers and of the submissions of the Advocate-General, as well as the hearing, if any, of witnesses and experts.
Ustni postopek zajema branje poročila, ki ga predloži sodnik poročevalec, zaslišanje zastopnikov, svetovalcev in odvetnikov, ki ga opravi Sodišče, ter poslušanje sklepnih predlogov generalnega prav­obranilca, po potrebi pa tudi zaslišanje prič in izvedencev.
Where it considers that the case raises no new point of law, the Court may decide, after hearing the Advocate-General, that the case shall be determined without a submission from the Advocate- General.
Če Sodišče meni, da zadeva ne odpira nobenega novega pravnega vprašanja, lahko po nastopu generalnega pravobranilca sklene, da se o zadevi odloča brez sklepnega predloga generalnega prav­obranilca.
The application shall contain the applicant’s name and permanent address and the description of the signatory, the name of the party or names of the parties against whom the application is made, the subject-matter of the dispute, the form of order sought and a brief statement of the pleas in law on which the application is based.
Tožba mora vsebovati ime in stalni naslov tožnika ter zaposlitev podpisanega, ime stranke ali strank, proti katerim je tožba vložena, predmet spora, zahtevek in kratek povzetek tožbenih razlogov.
If the documents are not submitted with the application, the Registrar shall ask the party concerned to produce them within a reasonable period, but in that event the rights of the party shall not lapse even if such documents are produced after the time limit for bringing proceedings.
Če ta dokazila niso priložena tožbi, sodni tajnik zadevno stranko pozove, naj jih predloži v razumnem roku, pri čemer pa tožba ne more biti zavržena niti v primeru, če dokazila niso predložena po izteku roka, predpisanega za vložitev tožbe.
The latter shall conform to any decisions on points of law given by the Court.
Vezan je na vse odločitve Sodišča o pravnih vpraša­njih.
Article 23a (
Člen 23a (
The Rules of Procedure may provide for an expedited or accelerated procedure and, for references for a preliminary ruling relating to the area of freedom, security and justice, an urgent procedure.
S poslovnikom se lahko predvidi hitri postopek, za obravnavanje predlogov za sprejetje predhodnih odločb, ki se nanašajo na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, pa nujni postopek.
Those procedures may provide, in respect of the submission of statements of case or written observations, for a shorter period than that provided for by Article 23, and, in derogation from the fourth paragraph of Article 20, for the case to be determined without a submission from the Advocate General.
Pri teh postopkih se lahko za predložitev vlog ali pisnih stališč predvidi rok, ki je krajši od roka, določenega v členu 23, z odstopanjem od četrtega odstavka člena 20 pa se lahko predvidi tudi, da ni sklepnih predlogov generalnega pravobranilca.
In addition, the urgent procedure may provide for restriction of the parties and other interested persons mentioned in Article 23, authorised to submit statements of case or written observations and, in cases of extreme urgency, for the written stage of the procedure to be omitted.
V nujnem postopku se lahko poleg tega predvidi tudi omejitev strank in drugih udeležencev iz člena 23, ki lahko predložijo vloge ali pisna stališča, in da se v izjemno nujnih primerih pisni postopek ne opravi.
) Article inserted by Decision 2008/79/EC, Euratom (OJ L 24, 29.1.2008, p. 42).
) Člen vstavljen s Sklepom 2008/79/ES, Euratom (UL L 24, 29.1.2008, str. 42)
Article 26 Witnesses may be heard under conditions laid down in the Rules of Procedure.
Člen 26 Priče so lahko zaslišane pod pogoji, določenimi v poslovniku.
Article 29
Člen 29 Sodišče lahko odredi, da pričo ali izvedenca zasliši sodišče v kraju njegovega stalnega prebivališča.
The Court of Justice may order that a witness or expert be heard by the judicial authority of his place of permanent residence.
Odredba se pošlje pristojnemu sodišču v izvrševanje pod pogoji, določenimi v poslovniku.
The documents drawn up in compliance with the letters rogatory shall be returned to the Court under the same conditions.
Doku­menti, sestavljeni pri izpolnjevanju zaprosila za pravno pomoč, se pod enakimi pogoji vrnejo Sodišču.
Article 33 Minutes shall be made of each hearing and signed by the President and the Registrar.
Člen 33 O vsaki obravnavi se sestavi zapisnik, ki ga podpišeta predsednik in sodni tajnik.
Article 34 The case list shall be established by the President.
Člen 34
Article 35 The deliberations of the Court of Justice shall be and shall remain secret.
Člen 35
Article 36
Člen 36 Sodbe so obrazložene.
Judgments shall state the reasons on which they are based.
V njih so navedena imena sodnikov, ki so odločali.
Article 37 Judgments shall be signed by the President and the Registrar.
Člen 37 Sodbe podpišeta predsednik in sodni tajnik.
They shall be read in open court.
Preberejo se na javnem zasedanju Sodišča.
Article 40 Member States and institutions of the Union may intervene in cases before the Court of Justice.
Člen 40 Države članice in institucije Unije se lahko pridružijo postopku, ki teče pred Sodiščem.
The same right shall be open to the bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and to any other person which can establish an interest in the result of a case submitted to the Court.
Enako velja za vse organe, urade in agencije Unije ter osebe, ki lahko izkažejo upravičen interes za rešitev Sodišču predložene zadeve.
Member States, institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union and any other natural or legal persons may, in cases and under conditions to be determined by the Rules of Procedure, institute third-party proceedings to contest a judgment rendered without their being heard, where the judgment is prejudicial to their rights.
Države članice, institucije, organi, uradi ali agencije Unije in vse druge fizične ali pravne osebe lahko v primerih in pod pogoji, določenimi v poslovniku, sprožijo postopek tretje stranke, s katerim lahko ugovarjajo zoper sodbo, ki je bila izdana v zadevi, pri kateri same niso bile udeležene, sodba pa škodi njihovim pravicam.
An application for revision of a judgment may be made to the Court of Justice only on discovery of a fact which is of such a nature as to be a decisive factor, and which, when the judgment was given, was unknown to the Court and to the party claiming the revision.
Obnovo postopka se lahko pri Sodišču zahteva le v primeru, da se odkrije novo dejstvo odločilnega pomena, ki je bilo pred izrekom sodbe neznano Sodišču in stranki, ki zahteva obnovo.
The revision shall be opened by a judgment of the Court expressly recording the existence of a new fact, recognising that it is of such a character as to lay the case open to revision and declaring the application admissible on this ground.
Obnova postopka se začne z odločbo, v kateri Sodišče izrecno ugotavlja obstoj novega dejstva in priznava, da je to dejstvo takšno, da je lahko podlaga za obnovo postopka, in izjavlja, da je zahteva iz teh razlogov dopustna.
Article 45 Periods of grace based on considerations of distance shall be determined by the Rules of Procedure.
Člen 45 Roki, ki upoštevajo oddaljenost, se določijo s poslovnikom.
In the latter event the proceedings must be instituted within the period of two months provided for in Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 265 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union shall apply where appropriate.
V tem primeru je treba postopek sprožiti v dvomesečnem roku, predvidenem v členu 263 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije; kjer je to primerno, se uporabljajo določbe drugega odstavka člena 265 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
This Article shall also apply to proceedings against the European Central Bank regarding non- contractual liability.
Ta člen se uporablja tudi za tožbe proti Evropski centralni banki v zadevah, ki izhajajo iz nepo­godbene odgovornosti.
The first paragraph of Article 9, Articles 14 and 15, the first, second, fourth and fifth paragraphs of Article 17 and Article 18 shall apply to the General Court and its members.
Prvi odstavek člena 9, člen 14 in člen 15, prvi, drugi, četrti in peti odstavek člena 17 ter člen 18 se uporabljajo za Splošno sodišče in njegove člane.
The fourth paragraph of Article 3 and Articles 10, 11 and 14 shall apply to the Registrar of the General Court mutatis mutandis.
Četrti odstavek člena 3 ter členi 10, 11 in 14 se mutatis mutandis uporabljajo za sodnega tajnika Splošnega sodišča.
The General Court shall consist of 27 Judges.
Splošno sodišče ima sedemindvajset sodnikov.
Article 49 The Members of the General Court may be called upon to perform the task of an Advocate-General.
Člen 49 Člani Splošnega sodišča so lahko pozvani k opravljanju naloge generalnega pravobranilca.
A Member called upon to perform the task of Advocate-General in a case may not take part in the judgment of the case.
Član, ki je pozvan k opravljanju naloge generalnega pravobranilca v neki zadevi, ne sme sodelovati pri odločanju o njej.
— decisions taken by the Council under the third subparagraph of Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
— sklepov, ki jih Svet sprejme na podlagi tretjega pododstavka člena 108(2) Pogodbe o delo­vanju Evropske unije,
— acts of the Council by which the Council exercises implementing powers in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
— aktov Sveta, s katerimi Svet uresničuje izvedbena pooblastila v skladu s členom 291(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
(b) against an act of or failure to act by the Commission under the first paragraph of Article 331 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
(b) ukrepanje ali opustitev ukrepanja Komisije na podlagi člena 331(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Article 53 The procedure before the General Court shall be governed by Title III.
Člen 53 Postopek pred Splošnim sodiščem ureja naslov III.
Notwithstanding the fourth paragraph of Article 20, the Advocate-General may make his reasoned submissions in writing.
Ne glede na četrti odstavek člena 20 lahko generalni pravobranilec svoje obrazložene sklepne predloge predstavi v pisni obliki.
Where the General Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action in respect of which the Court of Justice has jurisdiction, it shall refer that action to the Court of Justice; likewise, where the Court of Justice finds that an action falls within the jurisdiction of the General Court, it shall refer that action to the General Court, whereupon that Court may not decline jurisdiction.
Če Splošno sodišče ugotovi, da ni pristojno za obravnavanje in odločanje o tožbi, za katero je pristojno Sodišče, jo odstopi Sodišču; prav tako, če Sodišče ugotovi, da je za tožbo pristojno Splošno sodišče, jo odstopi Splošnemu sodišču, to pa ne more odkloniti pristojnosti.
Final decisions of the General Court, decisions disposing of the substantive issues in part only or disposing of a procedural issue concerning a plea of lack of competence or inadmissibility, shall be notified by the Registrar of the General Court to all parties as well as all Member States and the institutions of the Union even if they did not intervene in the case before the General Court.
Sodni tajnik Splošnega sodišča o končnih odločitvah Splošnega sodišča, delnih odločitvah o vsebin­skih vprašanjih, odločitvah o procesnih vprašanjih glede nepristojnosti ali nedopustnosti obvesti vse stranke ter države članice in institucije Unije, četudi se niso pridružile postopku pred Splošnim sodiščem.
However, interveners other than the Member States and the institutions of the Union may bring such an appeal only where the decision of the General Court directly affects them.
Tisti, ki so se postopku pridružili, razen držav članic in institucij Unije, pa lahko vložijo takšno pritožbo le, če jih odločitev Splošnega sodišča neposredno prizadeva.
In accordance with conditions laid down in the Rules of Procedure, the Court of Justice, having heard the Advocate-General and the parties, may dispense with the oral procedure.
Sodišče lahko v skladu s pogoji, določenimi v poslovniku, po zaslišanju generalnega pravobra­nilca in strank odloči brez ustnega postopka.
By way of derogation from Article 280 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, decisions of the General Court declaring a regulation to be void shall take effect only as from the date of expiry of the period referred to in the first paragraph of Article 56 of this Statute or, if an appeal shall have been brought within that period, as from the date of dismissal of the appeal, without prejudice, however, to the right of a party to apply to the Court of Justice, pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or Article 157 of the EAEC Treaty, for the suspension of the effects of the regulation which has been declared void or for the prescription of any other interim measure.
Z odstopanjem od člena 280 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije začnejo odločitve Splošnega sodišča, s katerimi se neka uredba razglasi za nično, veljati šele z datumom poteka roka iz prvega odstavka člena 56 tega statuta ali, če je bila v tem roku vložena pritožba, z datumom njene zavrnitve, vendar brez poseganja v pravico stranke, da skladno s členoma 278 in 279 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ali členom 157 Pogodbe ESAE pri Sodišču zaprosi za začasno odložitev učinkov uredbe, ki je bila razglašena za nično, ali za uvedbo druge začasne odredbe.
When an appeal brought by a Member State or an institution of the Union, which did not intervene in the proceedings before the General Court, is well founded, the Court of Justice may, if it considers this necessary, state which of the effects of the decision of the General Court which has been quashed shall be considered as definitive in respect of the parties to the litigation.
Če je pritožba, ki jo vložita država članica ali institucija Unije, ki se nista pridružili postopku pred Splošnim sodiščem, utemeljena, lahko Sodišče, če meni, da je to potrebno, navede, kateri učinki razveljavljene odločitve Splošnega sodišča naj se za stranke v sporu štejejo za dokončne.
In the cases provided for in Article 256(2) and (3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, where the First Advocate-General considers that there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of Union law being affected, he may propose that the Court of Justice review the decision of the General Court.
Če v primerih iz člena 256(2) in (3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije prvi generalni pravobranilec meni, da obstaja resno tveganje za enotnost ali doslednost prava Unije, lahko predlaga, da Sodišče preuči odločitev Splošnega sodišča.
The Court of Justice shall give a ruling on the questions which are subject to review by means of an urgent procedure on the basis of the file forwarded to it by the General Court.
Sodišče odloča o vprašanjih, ki so predmet revizije, po hitrem postopku na podlagi spisa, ki mu ga posreduje Splošno sodišče.
If the Court of Justice finds that the decision of the General Court affects the unity or consistency of Union law, it shall refer the case back to the General Court which shall be bound by the points of law decided by the Court of Justice; the Court of Justice may state which of the effects of the decision of the General Court are to be considered as definitive in respect of the parties to the litigation.
Če Sodišče ugotovi, da odločitev Splošnega sodišča škoduje enotnosti ali doslednosti prava Unije, zadevo vrne v odločanje Splošnemu sodišču, ki je glede pravnih vprašanj vezano na odločitev Sodišča; Sodišče lahko navede katere učinke odločitve Splošnega sodišča, je treba šteti za dokončne za stranke v sporu.
If, however, having regard to the result of the review, the outcome of the proceedings flows from the findings of fact on which the decision of the General Court was based, the Court of Justice shall give final judgment.
Vendar Sodišče odloča dokončno, če, ob upoštevanju ugoto­vitev revizije, rešitev spora izhaja iz ugotovljenega dejanskega stanja, na katerem je Splošno sodišče utemeljilo svojo odločitev.
In the cases provided for in Article 256(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in the absence of proposals for review or decisions to open the review procedure, the answer(s) given by the General Court to the questions submitted to it shall take effect upon expiry of the periods prescribed for that purpose in the second paragraph of Article 62.
Če v primerih iz člena 256(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ni predlogov za revizijo ali odločitve o uvedbi revizijskega postopka, začne odgovor ali več odgovorov Splošnega sodišča na predložena vprašanja učinkovati po izteku rokov, določenih v ta namen v drugem odstavku člena 62.
Should a review procedure be opened, the answer(s) subject to review shall take effect following that procedure, unless the Court of Justice decides otherwise.
V primeru uvedbe revizijskega postopka začne odgovor ali več odgovorov, ki so predmet revizije, učinkovati, če Sodišče ne odloči drugače, po koncu tega postopka.
If the Court of Justice finds that the decision of the General Court affects the unity or consistency of Union law, the answer given by the Court of Justice to the questions subject to review shall be substituted for that given by the General Court.
Če Sodišče ugotovi, da odločitev Splošnega sodišča škoduje enotnosti ali doslednosti prava Unije, odgovor Sodišča na vprašanja, ki so predmet revizije, nadomesti odgovor Splošnega sodišča.
SPECIALISED COURTS
SPECIALIZIRANA SODIŠČA
The provisions relating to the jurisdiction, composition, organisation and procedure of the specialised courts established under Article 257 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union are set out in an Annex to this Statute.
Določbe o pristojnostih, sestavi, organizaciji in postopku specializiranih sodišč, ustanovljenih na podlagi člena 257 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, so priložene k temu statutu.