natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Committee responsible for: • the operation and development of the common fisheries policy and its management; • the conservation of fishery resources; • the common organisation of the market in fishery products; • structural policy in the fisheries and aquaculture sectors, including the financial instruments for fisheries guidance; • international fisheries agreements.
Odbor je pristojen za vprašanja, povezana: • z delovanjem in razvojem skupne ribiške politike ter njenim vodenjem; • z ohranjanjem ribolovnih virov; • s skupno ureditvijo trga z ribiškimi izdelki; • s strukturno politiko na področju ribištva in ribogojstva, vključno s finančnimi instrumenti za usmerjanje ribištva; • z mednarodnimi sporazumi na področju ribištva.
With regard to conservation of resources, the Committee on Fisheries has asked for the following objectives to be added:•ensuring sustainable development of activities conducted in seas and oceans;•following up activities with an impact on marine biodiver-sity;•undertaking marine research and applied research in the fisheries sector.
Odbora za ribištvo v nasprotju z drugimi odbori lahko hkrati tudi polnopravni član katerega drugega parlamentarnega odbora.
Even though the Committee on Fisheries is responsible for a common policy, up to the end of the sixth parliamentary term it had eectively been neutralised.
Na sestanku konference predsednikov političnih skupin 12. marca 2009 je bilo odločeno, da bo Odbor za ribištvo dobil vsa pooblastila.
This means that, unlike the situation with other committees, a titular member of the Committee on Fisheries could also be a titular member of another of Parliament’s standing committees.
Ta odločitev bi morala odboru omogočiti, da z večjo učinkovitostjo in razpoložljivostjo izvaja okrepljene pristojnosti, ki mu jih dodeljuje lizbonska pogodba.
In its meeting of 12 March 2009, the Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament decided to ‘deneutralise’ the Committee on Fisheries.
Odbor za ribištvo za ohranjanje virov zahteva vključitev naslednjih ciljev:•zagotavljanje trajnostnega razvoja dejavnosti v morjih in oceanih;•premljanje dejavnosti, ki vplivajo na morsko biotsko raznovr-stnost;•zagotavljanje raziskovanja morja in aplikativnih raziskav v ribištvu.
This decision should enable the Committee to exercise its increased powers ensuing from the Treaty of Lisbon more eciently and receptively.
TRENUTNO VELJAVNI ZAKONODAJNI POSTOPEK
In a structural context, the Committee on Fisheries is proposing an amendment to provide a policy aimed at improving fisheries and aquaculture structures and the structures of processing of fishery products, including the financial instruments and funds.
Glede strukturne ravni pa Odbor za ribištvo predlaga naslednjo spremembo: „za politiko, katere namen bo izboljšanje struktur ribištva, ribogojstva in predelave ribiških proizvodov, vključno s finančnimi instrumenti in skladi.“
Finally, the Committee on Fisheries is calling for the external aspect to be adapted in line with the methods decided on in the 2002 reform of the CFP.
Odbor za ribištvo zahteva tudi spremembo področja zunanjih zadev v skladu s pravili po reformi SRP iz leta 2002.
For example, it suggests replacing the reference to ‘international fisheries agree-ments’ with a reference to partnership agreements with third countries in the fisheries sector, regional fisheries organisations, and international forums and bodies.
Predlaga, da se sklicevanje„na mednarodne ribiške sporazume“ spremeni v sklicevanje„na partnerske sporazume o ribištvu s tretjimi državami, regionalne ribiške organizacije ter mednarodne forume in organe“.
Article 37(2), third subparagraph, of the Treaty lays down the procedure for drafting and implementing the CFP, which is based on a proposal from the Commission, the opinion of the European Parliament (expressed by the plenary following amendments by the Committee on Fisheries on subjects within its competence) (Box 3), the opinion, if applicable, of the Economic and Social Committee, and the nal decision of the Council by a qualied majority.
) z Evropskim parlamentom, ki ga kljub novim postopkom (sodelovanja in soodločanja), uvedenih z enotnim evropskim aktom, maastrichtsko in amsterdamsko pogodbo, nikoli niso spreminjali.
For the European Parliament it is therefore a simple consul- tation3 procedure, which has never been amended despite the new procedures (of cooperation or codecision) introduced by the Single European Act, the Treaty of Maastricht and the Treaty of Amsterdam.
Ob upoštevanju dodatnih pristojnosti, ki so dodeljene GD MARE pri Evropski komisiji, in postopnega povezovanja ribiške politike z drugimi politikami je mogoče pričakovati tudi nove horizontalne predloge Komisije, zlasti v okviru integrirane morske politike.
In view of the additional responsibilities bestowed on the Commission’s DG MARE and the gradual integration of sh-eries policy with other policies, we can expect to see new horizontal proposals by the Commission, particularly in the context of integrated maritime policy.
Čeprav je Odbor za ribištvo zadolžen za eno od skupnih politik, je bila do konca šestega zakonodajnega obdobja njegova vloga dejansko okrnjena.
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, Title II: Legislative procedures.
Poslovnik Evropskega parlamenta, Naslov II: Zakonodajni postopki.
THE LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE PURSUANT TO THE TREATY OF LISBON powers, as conferred by the Treaty of Lisbon, particularly in the context of fundamental reforms of the CFP or of provisions necessary to pursue the objectives of the common sh-eries policy.
Lizbonska pogodba (UL C 155, 9.5.2008) (4) priznava postopek soodločanja kot redni zakonodajni postopek v SRP, ki nadomešča trenutno veljavni postopek posvetovanja.
In the course of the new parliamentary term, the European Parliament will have to ensure that the structure and decision-making levels of the fisheries rules are claried, without eroding its legitimate powers.
Ko bodo pogodbo raticirale vse države članice Unije, bo torej ena od večjih sprememb za SRP uvedba postopka soodločanja, pri čemer bo Evropski parlament dobil vlogo dejanskega sozakonodajalca pri ribištvu.
The draft Treaty of Lisbon (OJ C 155 of 9.5.2008)4 recognises codecision as the ‘ordinary legislative procedure’ for the CFP, in place of the consultation procedure in force.
Opomniti velja, da lizbonska pogodba med drugim zahteva odobritev (postopek privolitve) Evropskega parlamenta tudi za sklenitev mednarodnih sporazumov, ki imajo znane posledice na proračun Unije ali vključujejo področja, za katera velja redni zakonodajni postopek ali posebni zakonodajni postopek, kjer je potrebna privolitev Evropskega parlamenta.
Thus, once the Treaty is ratied by all the EU Member States, the introduction of codecision will represent a major change for the CFP, conferring on the European Parliament a genuine co-legislative role in fisheries.
Iz tega izhaja, da so regionalni sporazumi v okviru regionalnih ribiških organizacij in partnerski sporazumi o ribištvu s tretjimi državami načeloma lahko sklenjeni šele po privolitvi Parlamenta.
However, the new Treaty poses certain problems of interpretation, inasmuch as it introduces exceptions to the ordinary procedure in favour of the Council, in particular as regards ‘measures on fixing prices, levies, aid and quantitative limitations and on the fixing and allocation of fishing opportunities’ (Article 43(3) TFEU).
Toda nova pogodba odpira tudi nekaj vprašanj pri razlagi, kdaj so možne izjeme od rednega postopka v prid Svetu, zlasti kar zadeva „ukrepe o določitvi cen, prelevmanov, pomoči in količinskih omejitev ter o določitvi in dodelitvi ribolovnih možnosti“ (člen 43(3) Pogodbe o delovanju EU).
It should be borne in mind that the Treaty of Lisbon requires the approval of the European Parliament (assent procedure), among others, for the conclusion of international agreements with recognised budgetary implications for the EU, or covering fields to which the ordinary legislative procedure or the special legislative procedure applies when the European Parliament’s approval is required.
Lizbonska pogodba tudi določa, da je Evropski parlament nemudoma in v celoti obveščen v vseh fazah postopka. To je še zlasti pomembno ob upoštevanju starih zahtevkov Evropskega parlamenta za pregledno in hitro prenašanje informacij o trenutnih pogajanjih.
It follows that, in principle, regional agreements within the framework of the regional fisheries organisations (RFOs) and fisheries partnership agreements with third countries can be concluded only following Parliament’s approval.
Evropski parlament je tudi zahteval, da njegovi predstavniki sodelujejo na usklajevalnih sestankih Skupnosti, sestankih regionalnih ribiških organizacij in sestankih skupnih odborov v okviru dvostranskih sporazumov.
In the absence of a clear definition of the legislative powers of the European Parliament and the Council in respect of fisheries, political and legal problems could arise, even if case-law calls for a restrictive interpretation of the exceptions.
Ker ne obstaja jasna ločnica med zakonodajnimi pristojnostmi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta na področju ribištva, lahko pride do političnih in pravnih problemov, čeprav sodna praksa zahteva strogo razlago izjem.
It would be dicult for the European Parliament to accept general implementing reservations in favour of the Council, for example extending the scope of interpretation of ‘the allocation of fishing opportunities’ to other measures such as fishing eort or technical measures.
Evropski parlament bi na primer težko sprejel splošne pridržke glede izvajanja v prid Svetu, če bi razlago dodelitve ribolovnih možnosti razširili na druge ukrepe, kot so ribolovni napor ali tehnični ukrepi.
Moreover, the Treaty of Lisbon establishes that the European Parliament is to be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure.
GLAVNE TEME V ŠESTEM ZAKONODAJNEM OBDOBJU
This is particularly important in view of the European Parliament’s longstanding demands for transparency and speed in the transmission of information on negotiations that are under way.
Ti splošni pridržki glede izvajanja v korist Sveta bi lahko pogojevali ali celo izničili pristojnosti soodločanja EP, ki so mu zagotovljene z lizbonsko pogodbo, zlasti v okviru temeljnih reform SRP ali določb, ki so potrebne za doseganje ciljev skupne ribiške politike.
The European Parliament has also called for its representatives to take part in Community coordination meetings at the meetings of regional sh-eries organisations and meetings of joint committees in the context of bilateral agreements.
Evropski parlament bo v novem zakonodajnem obdobju moral paziti, da bodo struktura in ravni odločanja za
These general implementing reservations in favour of the Council could qualify, or even invalidate, the EP’s codecision
Velik del poročil se nanaša na zunanje sporazume (29 %), ohranjanje virov (19 %), ohranjanje morskega okolja (10 %), nadzor ribištva (8 %) ter upravljanje SRP in njene smernice za prihodnost (8 %).
Treaty of Lisbon, both as regards application of the assent procedure and from the perspective of the EP’s right to be immediately and fully informed at each stage of the procedure.
Šesto zakonodajno obdobje o „ohranjanju ribolovnih virov s tehničnimi ukrepi“ (6). Ta tema je pomembna iz več razlogov, saj predstavlja nekakšen most k prihodnji in spremenjeni SRP.
THE MAIN LEGISLATIVE DOSSIERS IN THE COURSE OF THE SIXTH PARLIAMENTARY TERM
Ribiški sporazumi28 %
The sixth parliamentary term was a period of transition between two reforms.
Odbor je predlagal tudi, da bi tudi pretiran ulov nedoraslih rib povzročil takojšnje zaprtje ribolovnega subjekta.
The legislative acts implementing the 2002 reform provided the basis for much of the work of the Committee on Fisheries.
Ta kvota bi se morala postopno zmanjševati, kar bi dodatno spodbudilo izboljšanje selektivnosti ribolovnega orodja.
In addition to opinions, the Committee on Fisheries adopted 102 reports.
Tako veliko število poročil o zunanjih sporazumih priča o pomembnosti teh sporazumov za ribištvo Skupnosti.
Many of the reports relate to external agreements (29%), conservation of resources (19%), conservation of the marine environment (10%), control and monitoring of fisheries (8%), and governance of the CFP and its future guidelines (8%).
Na to dejstvo je treba gledati v luči širjenja pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta po ratikaciji lizbonske pogodbe, tako z vidika izvajanja postopka privolitve kot z vidika pravice EP, da je nemudoma in v celoti obveščen v vseh fazah postopka.
With regard to the policy of conservation of resources, most of the reports adopted by the Committee on Fisheries involved stock recovery and management plans.
Veliko število poročil, ki se osredotočajo zgolj na ohranjanje morskega okolja, jasno kaže, da je tudi ta tema zelo pomembna.
Three other reports were of sucient political importance to be worth mentioning.
Poleg teh desetih poročil je odbor izdal tudi druga poročila, ki so tesno povezana z okoljskimi temami.
By the end of the fifth parliamentary term, Parliament had blocked the proposed regulation concerning ‘man-agement measures for the sustainable exploitation of fishery resources in the Mediterranean Sea’. A compromise was subsequently reached between Parliament5 and the Commission with a view to trying to restore a satisfactory situation as regards these resources as quickly as possible.
Tako je na primer tema poročila o„SRP in ekosistemskem pristopu k upravljanju ribištva“ (8) temeljnega pomena za prihodnjo reformo, tako kot poročilo, ki zadeva„ribištvo in ribogojstvo v okviru integriranega upravljanja obalnih območij v Evropi“ (9) in se dotika integrirane pomorske politike.
Along very dierent lines is the report on ‘conservation of
Večina poročil, ki jih je sprejel Odbor za ribištvo, je bila glede politike ohranjanja virov usmerjena v načrte za obnovo in upravljanje staležev.
The large number of reports specically covering conservation of the marine environment clearly demonstrates how important this subject is. In addition to these 10 reports, others were closely associated with environmental issues.
Tudi poročilo o „zagotovitvi trajnosti v ribištvu EU z največjim trajnostnim donosom“(10) je izjemno pomembno za prihodnjo reformo SRP.
For example, the subject of the report on ‘the CFP and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management’8 is of fundamental importance in the context of the forthcoming reform, as is the dossier on ‘fisheries and aquaculture in the context of integrated coastal zone management in Europe’9, which men- tions the integrated maritime policy.
Evropski parlament je v zelo kritičnem poročilu opozoril, da je po mnenju večine znanstvenih ustanov klasični model največjega trajnostnega donosa že zastarel v primerjavi z drugimi, naprednejšimi pristopi, ki upoštevajo celoten ekosistem. Poleg tega je opozoril tudi na težave pri izvajanju modela največjega trajnostnega donosa pri ribolovu na več vrst.
The report on ‘implementing sustainability in European Union fisheries through maximum sustainable yield’10is also crucially important in the face of the forthcoming CFP reform.
Obžaloval je neobstoj analiz o razvoju in različnih pristopih k modelu največjega trajnostnega donosa, pa tudi neustreznost predlaganih rešitev v sporočilu Komisije in neobstoj poglobljene študije o učinkih izvajanja modela največjega trajnostnega donosa.
In an extremely critical report, the European Parliament warned that, for a large majority of scientists, the traditional maximum sustainable yield (MSY) model had been superseded by new cutting-edge approaches which considered the ecosystem in its entirety.
EP je pozval Komisijo, naj vzpostavi sistem dostopa do virov, ki bo naklonjen trajnosti, bo oteževal zavržke, poenostavil tehnične ukrepe, odpravil diskriminacijo in prekomerno konkurenco pri prisvajanju virov, dal potrebno prožnost in izboljšal konkurenčnost sektorja.
It also cautioned that it would be dicult to apply the MSY model to multispecies fisheries.
Poudaril je tudi, da morajo vse spremembe sistema upravljanja nujno sloneti na mehanizmih nadomestil, ki bodo temeljili na analizi social-no-gospodarskih posledic predloga.
It lamented the decient analysis and inadequate solutions offered by the Commission’s communication with regard to the
V nekem drugem poročilu o orodjih za upravljanje ribištva na podlagi pravic je Evropski parlament (11) pozval Komisijo, naj preuči sisteme upravljanja na podlagi pravic, ki se trenutno uporabljajo v državah članicah, in naj oceni njihovo učinkovitost pri doseganju ciljev skupne ribiške politike.
In another report on rights-based management tools, the European
Tematski sektor B je septembra 2007 o tej temi pripravil delavnico (13).
Another important topic in the context of the forthcoming CFP reform will be governance and the part played in it by the regional advisory councils.
V okviru prihodnje reforme SRP bo pomembno tudi vprašanje upravljanja in vloga, ki jo bodo v njem imeli regionalni svetovalni sveti. Odbor za ribištvo je
European Parliament, 2007.
15 o tej temi sprejel dve poročili (
There are many other important reports.
Pomembna so tudi številna druga poročila.
Lastly, the Commission’s proposal on ‘a Community eco- labelling scheme (repeal of Regulation (EC) No 1980/2000)’ has currently revived Parliament’s report on ‘Launching a debate on a Community approach towards ecolabelling schemes for fisheries products’19.
Med osmimi poročili, ki jih je Odbor za ribištvo sprejel o nadzoru ribištva, je posebej pomembno zlasti poročilo o „nadzornem sistemu Skupnosti za zagotavljanje skladnosti s predpisi SRP (razveljavlja uredbi (EGS) št. 2847/93 in (ES) št. 1627/94)“, saj lahko velja bodisi za most k prihodnji SRP bodisi za pozno izvajanje reforme iz leta 2002.
Since the issue is likely to resurface in the next parliamentary term, it should be borne in mind that the European Parliament had urged the Commission to submit a communication going over the minimum requirements and the guidelines to which a Community ecolabelling system for fishery products should adhere.
Čeprav je Parlament to poročilo sprejel ob koncu šestega zakonodajnega obdobja, predvideva Svet sprejetje uredbe v letu 2010.
Parliament had stressed that the Commission should promote such a system, lay down its rules, and ensure the independence of the specialised accreditation and certication bodies, and the credibility of the claims to such labelling.
Uredba bo posledično gotovo vsebovala tudi nove smernice SRP.
to create a list of vessels involved in IUU fishing activities and a system of state control of ports in order to prevent access to them by third-country vessels involved in IUU fishing activities.
nost oblikovanja seznama plovil, ki so vključene v nezakonit, neprijavljen in zakonsko neurejen ribolov, ter sistema nadzorovanja pristanišč za vsako državo posebej, da bi plovilom iz tretjih držav, ki sodelujejo pri takšnem ribolovu, preprečili dostop.
It has proposed prohibiting imports of IUU fishery products by means of compulsory certication on the part of the flag State, attesting the legality of its products.
Predlaga prepoved uvoza proizvodov iz nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in zakonsko neurejenega ribolova z uporabo obveznih certikatov države zastave, ki bi potrjevali zakonitost teh proizvodov.
Throughout the sixth parliamentary term, the European Parliament was concerned about the crisis affecting the fisheries sector.
Poleg tega zagovarja razvoj sistema Skupnosti za opozarjanje v primeru zaznave proizvodov iz nezakonitega,
18 Centro Tecnológico del Mar – Fundación CETMAR Spain Inshore Fisheries and the Problems Encountered by Inshore Fishermen, European Parliament, 2005.
27 neprijavljenega in zakonsko neurejenega ribolova, kot tudi prepoved uvoza rib iz držav, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da ne sodelujejo s sistemom EU.
THE PRIORITIES FOR THE SEVENTH PARLIAMENTARY TERM: REFORM OF THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY
PREDNOSTNE NALOGE ZA SEDMO ZAKONODAJNO OBDOBJE: REFORMA SKUPNE RIBIŠKE POLITIKE forme.
Under this timetable, the reform regulations should be adopted and enter into force in 2012.
V skladu s tem časovnim načrtom bi morale biti uredbe o reformi sprejete in začeti veljati leta 2012.
Ever since it was created in 1983, the common fisheries policy (CFP) has been reviewed every 10 years.
Skupna ribiška politika (SRP) se že od ustanovitve leta 1983 vsakih deset let prenovi.
The last reform was adopted in 2002, and it will be re-examined in 2012 at the latest.
Zadnja reforma je bila sprejeta leta 2002 in bo znova pregledana najkasneje leta 2012.
The minimum content of the reform is laid down in Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, which provides for an examination by the Council of the arrangements for access to the waters up to 12 nautical miles from baselines under Member States’sovereignty or jurisdiction.
Minimalno vsebino reforme določa člen 17(2) uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002, ki predvideva, da predlog preuči Svet, če gre za pravila dostopa do voda držav članic v pasu 12 milj.
However, the deciencies in the CFP should lead the European institutions to go well beyond this simple examination, with a view to ensuring that fisheries are economically and environmentally viable.
Vendar bi evropske institucije zaradi pomanjkljivosti SRP morale preseči ta preprost pregled, da bi zagotovile gospodarsko in okoljsko upravičenost ribištva.
The reform of the CFP formed the subject of an informal ministerial meeting on 29 September 2008 under the French Presidency.
Tega se je že lotila s tem, ko je v predlogu o ohranjanju ribolovnih virov s tehničnimi ukrepi predvidela zelo široko uporabo komitologije.
The discussions at this meeting focused in particular on conservation policy and management of the fishing fleet.
Ta pristop bi pomenil prisilni prenos zakonodajnih pristojnosti. Ta prenos se lahko nanaša le na nebistvene dele zadevnega zakonodajnega akta, ki pa ga lahko spreminja ali dopolnjuje.
The Commission has on several occasions signalled its intention to relieve the European Parliament of questions that are too technical, which could delay or even impede the legislative procedures.
Reforma SRP je bila že tema neformalnega ministrskega srečanja pod francoskim predsedstvom 29. septembra 2008.
It has already set out down this path, by providing for very extensive use of comitology in its proposal on conservation of fish stocks through technical measures.
Razprave na tej konferenci so bile usmerjene predvsem v politiko ohranjanja in upravljanja ribiške flote.
This approach would involve extensive delegation of legislative power.
Komisija je z izdajo zelene knjige 22. aprila 2009 znova začela pregled SRP. Cilj tega pregleda je pokazati, kje je potreben premislek za prihodnje ukrepanje.
Consequently, neither the general orientations of a legislative act nor the general principles that underpin it can be subject to delegation of power of this kind.
Najprej bodo analizirani pozitivni in negativni vidiki trenutne politike, nato delovanje politike v primerjavi z drugimi sistemi upravljanja ribištva.
The Commission began the re-examination of the CFP by publishing the Green Paper of 22 April 2009.
Po izdaji zelene knjige se bo začelo šestmesečno obdobje posvetovanja.
The aim is to pinpoint avenues for further exploration, with a view to future action.
Komisija upa, da bo uspela povzetek javne razprave objaviti v začetku leta 2010.
In an initial phase, the strengths and weaknesses of the current policy will be analysed, and the way in which it operates will be evaluated by comparing it with other fisheries management systems.
V letu 2010 bi opravila oceno učinka in v začetku leta 2011 predstavila predlog re-