natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It would only be otherwise if they had fraudulently obtained a right of entry into the territory of a Member State by falsely claiming that they intended to study or act as an au pair.
Če pa se potrdi resničnost njihovega namena z dejanskim �tudijem ali opravljanjem dejavnosti kot „aupair“, če zakonito najdejo delo v državi članici gostiteljici in če izpolnijo pogoje iz člena 6(1) obravnavanega sklepa, lahko zadevne osebe uveljavljajo vse pravice, ki jim jih ta določba podeljuje.
On the contrary, provided that (i) the genuineness of their intention is confirmed by their actual pursuit of a course of studies or by acting as an au pair, (ii) they obtain work lawfully in the host Member State, and (iii) they satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 6(1) of the decision in question, the persons concerned can fully rely on the rights which that provision confers upon them.
Da bi se namreč preverilo, ali tur�ki državljani izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 6(1) obravnavanega sklepa, ni treba upo�tevati namena, s katerim je bil tem osebam dovoljen vstop na ozemlje zadevne države članice, ker ta člen za priznanje pravic, ki jih podeljuje tur�kim državljanom, ne določa nobenega pogoja, povezanega z namenom, s katerim jim je bila najprej podeljena pravica do vstopa, do dela in do prebivanja.
If those Turkish nationals succeed, objectively, in fulfilling the conditions laid down
Če ti tur�ki državljani izpolnijo pogoje, predvidene v treh alineah člena 6(1) Sklepa
(see paras 40, 45, 46, 49, operative part)
(Glej točke 40, 45, 46, 49 in izrek.)
PAYIR AND OTHERS
PAYIR IN DRUGI
KOKOTTdelivered on 18 July 2007
II – Pravni okvir
I — Introduction
A – Pravo Skupnosti
Under Article 36 of the Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement of 23 November 1970, the Association Council is to lay down the rules necessary for the securing by progressive stages of freedom of movement for workers between the Member States of the Community and Turkey on the basis of Article 12 of the Association Agreement.
V skladu s členom 36 Dodatnega protokola k Pridružitvenemu sporazumu z dne 23. novembra 1970 Pridružitveni svet določa potrebna pravila za postopno vzpostavitev prostega gibanja delavcev med državami članicami Skupnosti in Turčijo v skladu z na čeli iz člena 12 Pridružitvenega sporazuma.
The Association Council accordingly adopted Decision No 1/80 of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association. 3
V skladu s tem je Pridružitveni svet izdal Sklep �t. 1/80 z dne 19. septembra 1980 o razvoju pridružitve. 3
— shall enjoy free access in that Member State to any paid employment of his choice, after four years of legal employment.’
— po preteku �tirih let, odkar je zakonito zaposlen, v tej državi članici pridobi pravico do prostega dostopa do zaposlitve po svoji izbiri.“
Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80 provides:
Člen 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80 določa:
— shall be entitled in that Member State, after one year’s legal employment, to the renewal of his permit to work for the same employer, if a job is available;
Razen v primerih, določenih s čle -nom 7, ki ureja prost dostop do zaposlitve članov njegove družine, ima tur�ki delavec, ki je vključen v zakoniti trg dela države članice:
The relevant provisions on entry for au pairs and students may be found in the Immigration Rules, House of Commons Paper 395 (‘HC 395’).
Zadevne določbe o vstopu oseb, ki opravljajo delo kot „aupair“ oziroma �tudentov so v „House of Commons Paper“ 395 (v nadaljevanju: HC 395).
— shall be entitled in that Member State, after three years of legal employment and subject to the priority to be given to workers of Member States of the Community, to respond to another offer of employment, with an employer of his choice, made under normal conditions and registered with the employment services of that State, for the same occupation;
— po enem letu, odkar je v tej državi članici zakonito zaposlen, pravico, da se mu podalj�a delovno dovoljenje pri istem delodajalcu, če ta razpolaga z delovnim mestom;
It is available in EEC-Turkey Association Agreement and Protocols and Other Basic Texts, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels 1992.
3 — Sklep ni bil objavljen v Uradnem listu, natisnjen v: Urad za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti, Pridružitveni sporazum in Protokoli EGS-Turčija ter drugi osnovni dokumenti, Bruselj 1992.
The entry of au pairs is governed by Rules 88 to 93 of HC 395.
Vstop oseb, ki opravljajo delo kot „aupair“, je urejen v pravilih od �t. 88 do �t. 93 HC 395. V pravilu �t.
An au pair lives for a time as a member of an Englishspeaking family with appropriate opportunities for study and helps in the family’s home for a maximum of five hours a day, with two free days a week, for a reasonable allowance.
Oseba, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, živi določeno časovno obdobje kot član angle�ko govoreče družine, ima na razpolago primerne možnosti za učenje in dela v gospodinjstvu družine največ pet ur dnevno z dvema prostima dnevoma na teden in za primerno plačilo.
A person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom as an au pair may not, under Rule 89, inter alia intend to stay in the United Kingdom for more than two years as an au pair, and must intend to leave the United Kingdom on completion of the stay as an au pair.
Oseba, ki zaprosi za dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo kot oseba, ki bo opravljala delo kot „aupair“, v skladu s pravilom �t. 89 ne sme, med drugim, imeti namena ostati v Združenem kraljestvu dlje kot dve leti kot „aupair“, ampak mora imeti namen zapustiti Združeno kraljestvo po koncu njenega bivanja kot „au-pair“.
Paragraph 4 of the Immigration Directorate’s Instructions.
glede tega določene �e nadaljnje podrobnosti.
Under that provision, a person who has been granted leave to enter or remain as a student subject to a condition restricting his freedom to take employment (rather than prohibiting employment) has a general permission to work, provided that the work does not exceed 20 hours a week during any period in term-time.
V skladu s to določbo ima oseba, ki ji je bilo dovoljenje za vstop ali za prebivanje izdano kot �tudentu pod pogojem, da se ji omeji svoboda sprejeti zaposlitev (namesto prepovedi sprejeti zaposlitev), na voljo splo�no delovno dovoljenje, če delo ne presega 20 ur na teden med katerim koli obdobjem razen počitnic.
III — Facts and main proceedings
III – Dejansko stanje in spor o glavni stvari
Under Rule 57, a person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom as a student must have been accepted for a course of study and be able and intend to follow a recognised full-time course.
V skladu s pravilom �t. 57 mora biti oseba, ki zaprosi za dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo kot �tudent, sprejeta na �tudij in mora biti zmožna in imeti namen dokončati priznan redni �tudij.
He must intend to leave the United Kingdom at the end of his studies, and must not intend to engage in business or take employment, other than part-time or vacation work, for which permission is required.
Oseba mora imeti namen po koncu njenega �tudija zapustiti Združeno kraljestvo in ne sme imeti namena opravljati samostojne dejavnosti ali sprejeti zaposlitve, z izjemo dela s skraj�anim delovnim časom ali počitni�kim delom, za katero je potrebno dovoljenje.
Under Rule 58, a person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom as a student may be admitted subject to a condition restricting his freedom to take employment.
V skladu s pravilom �t. 58 se lahko osebi, ki zaprosi za dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo kot �tudent, dovoli vstop pod pogojem, da se ji omeji svoboda sprejeti zaposlitev. V poglavju 3, dodatek A, odsta- vek 4, „Immigration Director’s Instructions“ (navodila direktorata za priseljevanje), so
That leave included inter alia a condition that she did not take up paid or unpaid employment other than as an au pair.
To dovoljenje je med drugim vsebovalo pogoj, da ne sme sprejeti nobene druge odplačne ali neodplačne zaposlitve kot „au-pair“.
After entering the country she was engaged by two families.
Od njenega vstopa je bila E. Payir zaposlena pri dveh družinah.
She was with the second family from March 2001, and worked for 15 to 25 hours a week in the household and looking after the children.
Pri drugi družini je bila od mar ca 2001 in je tam delala od 15 do 25 ur na teden v gospodinjstvu ter skrbela za otroke.
In return she received board and lodging and GBP 70 a week.
Za to je dobila hrano in stanovanje ter 70 GBP na teden. E.
Ms Payir would like to continue working for that family.
Payir je želela �e naprej ostati zaposlena pri tej družini.
Secretary of State’s decisions on the ground that the claimants fell within the scope of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80.
KOKOTT – ZADEVA C-294/06 odločbo Secretary of State z utemeljitvijo, da sodijo tožeče stranke na področje uporabe člena 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80. Secretary of State je zoper te sklepe Administrative Court vložilo pritožbo pri Court of Appeal.
They were given leave to enter for that purpose, followed by leave to remain, in which they were allowed to take employment for a maximum in term-time of 20 hours a week.
Za to sta dobila vstopno dovoljenje in pozneje �e dovoljenje za prebivanje, v katerem jima je bilo dovoljeno sprejeti zaposlitev s časovno omejitvijo največ 20 ur na teden za obdobje, ko ni počitnic.
Alongside their studies, they both worked part-time, within the permitted limit, as waiters.
Oba �tudenta sta poleg �tudija delala kot natakarja s skraj�anim delovnim časom v dovoljenem obsegu.
Their employers have each offered to continue their employment.
Njuna delodajalca sta jima ponudila podalj�anje njunih pogodb o zaposlitvi.
IV — Reference for a preliminary ruling and procedure before the Court
IV – Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe in postopek pred Sodiščem
By order of 15 June 2006 the Court of Appeal referred the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling:
Court of Appeal je s sklepom z dne 15. junija 2006 Sodi�ču predložilo ta vpra�anja za predhodno odločanje:
The claimants applied to the Secretary of State for the Home Department (‘the Secretary of State’) for their leave to remain to be varied or extended for the purpose of continuing to be employed in the United Kingdom.
Tožeče stranke so pri Secretary of State for the Home Department (ministrstvo za notranje zadeve, v nadaljevanju: Secretary of State) zaprosile za spremembo ali podalj�anje dovoljenja za prebivanje z namenom, da bi lahko �e naprej ostale zaposlene v Združenem kraljestvu.
They based their applications on Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80.
Svoje pro�nje so oprle na člen 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80.
They submitted that they had worked for the same employer for more than one year, and applied to continue working for that employer.
Trdile so, da naj bi bile več kot eno leto zaposlene pri istem delodajalcu in so zahtevale, da ostanejo �e naprej pri tem delodajalcu.
The grounds for refusal were that students who worked part-time and au pairs could not rely on Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80.
Zavrnitev je utemeljilo s tem, da se �tudenta, ki opravljata delo s skraj�anim delovnim časom, in oseba, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, ne morejo sklicevati na člen 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80.
The claimants brought proceedings challenging the refusals.
Tožeče stranke so te odločbe o zavrnitvi izpodbijale pred sodi�čem.
The High Court of England and Wales, Administrative Court, allowed the applications and quashed the
Administrative Court, High Court of Englang and Wales, je tem tožbam ugodilo in razveljavilo a) je bilo tur�ki državljanki izdano dovoljenje za vstop v Združeno kraljestvo za dve leti, da se v tej državi zaposli kot „au pair“ v smislu opredelitve v pravilih o priseljevanju Združenega kraljestva;
(ii) her leave to enter included permission to be employed in that capacity; and duly registered as belonging to the labour force of the United Kingdom within the meaning of that Article?
PAYIR IN DRUGI b) je njeno vstopno dovoljenje zajemalo dovoljenje, da se kot „aupair“ zaposli; ii) prijavljena v skladu s predpisi, kot da pripada zakonitemu trgu dela Združenega kraljestva v smislu tega člena?
(b) that employment was in accordance with national laws relating to employment and immigration; his leave to enter included permission to be employed in any occupation with a limit during term time of 20 hours work per week; and then, was the Turkish national concerned, during that employment:
Ali je bil v primeru, če: c) je bila nepretrgoma zaposlena kot „aupair“ pri istem delodajalcu za obdobje, dalj�e od enega leta, med trajanjem veljavnosti vstopnega dovoljenja; a) je bilo tur�kemu državljanu dovoljeno vstopiti v Združeno kraljestvo v skladu s pravili o priseljevanju z namenom �tudirati v tej državi; d) je pri tej zaposlitvi �lo za pristno in dejansko gospodarsko dejavnost; in e) je bila ta zaposlitev v skladu z nacionalnimi zakoni v zvezi z zaposlitvijo in priseljevanjem; b) je njegovo vstopno dovoljenje zajemalo dovoljenje sprejeti vsako zaposlitev z omejitvijo na 20 delovnih ur na teden, razen v času počitnic; zadevna tur�ka državljanka med svojo zaposlitvijo: c) je bil nepretrgoma zaposlen pri istem delodajalcu za obdobje, dalj�e od enega leta, med trajanjem veljavnosti vstopnega dovoljenja; d) je pri tej zaposlitvi �lo za pristno in dejansko gospodarsko dejavnost; in i) delavka v smislu člena 6 Sklepa �t.
(d) a worker within the meaning of Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the Community and Turkey?
1/80 Pridružitvenega sveta, ustanovljenega s Pridružitvenim sporazumom med Skupnostjo in Turčijo?
V — Assessment that employment was in accordance with national laws relating to employment and immigration; then, was the Turkish national concerned, during that employment:
V – Presoja e) je bila ta zaposlitev v skladu z nacionalnimi zakoni v zvezi z zaposlitvijo in priseljevanjem; zadevni tur�ki državljan v času svoje zaposlitve i) delavec v smislu člena 6(1) Sklepa �t.
(i) a worker within the meaning of Article 6 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the Community and Turkey?
1/80 Pridružitvenega sveta, ustanovljenega s Pridružitvenim sporazumom med Skupnostjo in Turčijo?
To be able to rely on the rights under Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80, a person must be a Turkish worker, be duly registered as belonging to the labour force of the host Member State, and have been in legal employment there in accordance with the periods of time mentioned in Article 6(1).
Da bi se lahko sklicevala na pravice iz člena 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80, mora biti zadevna oseba tur�ki delavec, ki pripada zakonitemu trgu dela države članice gostiteljice in mora biti tam v skladu s časovnimi obdobji, opredeljenimi v členu 6(1), zakonito zaposlena.
The national court now asks whether au pairs and students carrying on secondary activities are workers within the meaning of Article 6 and are to be regarded as duly registered as belonging to the labour force.
Predložitveno sodi�če spra�uje le to, ali se lahko osebe, ki opravljajo delo kot „aupair“, in �tudenti, ki imajo stransko zaposlitev, opredelijo kot delavce v smislu člena 6 in kot da pripadajo zakonitemu trgu dela.
The issue is essentially whether it is relevant for the application of Article 6(1) that the host State has given leave to enter for the purpose of taking up a course of study or, in the case of au pairs, of learning a language.
V bistvu gre za vpra�anje, ali je za uporabo člena 6(1) pomembno, da je država gostiteljica dovolila vstop za namene �tudija oziroma v primeru „aupair“ za namene učenja jezika.
(ii) duly registered as belonging to the labour force of the United Kingdom within the meaning of that Article?’
ii) prijavljen v skladu s predpisi, kot da pripada zakonitemu trgu dela Združenega kraljestva v smislu tega člena?
The national court does not expressly ask about the third element in Article 6(1), the concept of ‘legal employment’. To give a comprehensive and conclusive answer to the court’s question, however, the third element in Article 6 must also be addressed below.
V postopku pred Sodi�čem so poleg strank v postopku v glavni stvari predložile svoja stali�ča in podale ustne navedbe Komisija Evropskih skupnosti, vlada Združenega kraljestva ter nem�ka in nizozemska vlada; dalje je predložila stali�ča italijanska vlada.
In addition to the parties to the main proceedings, the Commission of the European Communities, the United Kingdom Government and the German and Netherlands Governments made written and oral submissions in the proceedings before the Court; the Italian Government also submitted written observations.
Predložitveno sodi�če ne spra�uje izrecno glede tretjega elementa člena 6(1), namreč glede pojma „zakonito zaposlen“. Vendar je, da bi se ob�irno in dokončno odgovorilo na vpra�anje predložitvenega sodi�ča, v nadaljevanju treba obravnavati tudi ta tretji element člena 6.
A — Status of worker the host family’s children and does housework for 25 to 30 hours a week will as a rule have the status of a worker.
A – Status delavca predložitvenega sodi�ča skrbi za otroke sprejemne družine in opravlja gospodinjska dela od 25 do 30 ur na teden, bi praviloma imela status delavca.
With a weekly working time of 25 to 30 hours and activities such as child care and housework it cannot be said, with respect either to the duration of the activity or to its content, that there is only a purely marginal and ancillary activity.
Pri tedenskem delovnem času od 25 do 30 ur in dejavnostih, kot sta skrb za otroke in gospodinjska dela, ni mogoče niti glede trajanja dejavnosti niti glede njene vsebine govoriti o tem, da gre za popolnoma postransko in pomožno dejavnost.
On the contrary, it is an effective and genuine activity for the purposes of the concept of worker.
Tu gre bolj za dejansko in pristno dejavnost v smislu pojma delavca.
It is settled caselaw that, in order to interpret the concept of worker, reference must be made to the interpretation of that concept in Community law.
V skladu z ustaljeno sodno prakso je za razlago pojma delavca treba uporabiti razlago tega pojma v pravu Skupnosti.
4According to that interpretation, the concept has a Community meaning and must not be interpreted narrowly.
4V skladu s tem ima ta pojem skupnostni pomen in se ga ne sme ozko razlagati.
It must be defined in accordance with objective criteria which distinguish the employment relationship by reference to the rights and duties of the persons concerned.
Treba ga je opredeliti z objektivnimi merili, ki so značilna za delovno razmerje glede na pravice in obveznosti zadevnih oseb.
A worker is any person who pursues an activity which is effective and genuine, to the exclusion of activities on such a small scale as to be regarded as purely marginal and ancillary.
Delavec je vsak, ki opravlja dejansko in pristno dejavnost, pri čemer je treba izvzeti take dejavnosti, ki so zaradi svojega majhnega obsega popolnoma postranske in pomožne.
The essential feature of an employment relationship is that for a certain period of time a person performs services for and under the direction of another person in return for which he receives remuneration. 5
Bistvena značilnost nekega delovnega razmerja v tem smislu je, da nekdo med določenim časom za nekoga drugega po njegovih navodilih opravlja dela, za katera dobi v zameno plačilo. 5
An au pair who, like the claimant Payir, according to the national court, looks after
Oseba, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, tako kot tožeča stranka Payir, po podatkih
Nor does the fact that an au pair does not pursue a full-time activity prevent her from having the status of worker.
To, da oseba, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, ne opravlja dela s polnim delovnim časom, tudi ne nasprotuje temu, da bi ta oseba imela status delavca.
In the context of Article 39 EC the Court has already ruled that a person who only works part-time is to be regarded as a worker.
V okviru člena 39 ES je Sodi�če že razsodilo, da se lahko tudi osebo, ki dela samo s skraj�anim delovnim časom, opredeli kot delavca.
6 That must also apply in the context of Article 6(1) of Decision No 1/80.
6To mora veljati tudi v okviru člena 6(1) Sklepa �t. 1/80.
The decisive point must, rather, be whether an effective and genuine activity is pursued that is not purely marginal and ancillary.
Odločilno bi moralo, nasprotno, biti, ali se opravlja dejanska in pristna dejavnost, ki ni popolnoma postranska in pomožna.
4 — See Case C-1/97 Birden [1998] ECR I-7747, paragraph 23.
4 — Glej sodbo z dne 26. novembra 1998 v zadevi Birden (C-1/97, Recueil, str. I-7747, točka 23).
6 — See Case 53/81 Levin [1982] ECR 1035, paragraph 16, and Case 139/85 Kempf [1986] ECR 1741, paragraph 11.
1/80 glej samo sodbo z dne 19. novembra 2002 v zadevi Kurz (C-188/00, Recueil, str. I-10691, točka 32) in zgoraj v opombi 4 navedeno sodbo Birden (točki 25 in 28).
An au pair will generally also be subject to the instructions of the host family as regards her activity.
Praviloma se mora oseba, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, v zvezi s svojim delom ravnati po navodilih sprejemne družine.
of Article 39 EC.
bi bilo – drugače kot v okviru člena 39 ES – v okviru Sklepa �t.
There is no reason why it should be of relevance for the concept of worker in the context of Decision No 1/80 — unlike in the context of Article 39 EC — that the remuneration is paid in the form of board and lodging and pocket money.
1/80 za pojem delavca pomembno, da se protidajatev podeli v obliki brezplačnega stanovanja in hrane poleg žepnine.
It is questionable whether classification as a worker is precluded by the fact that an au pair receives her remuneration in the form of board and lodging with a sum of money in addition.
Sporno je, ali temu, da se uvrsti kot delavka, nasprotuje to, da oseba, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, dobi plačilo v obliki brezplačnega stanovanja in hrane poleg denarja.
The claimant Payir receives, as remuneration for her activity, board and lodging and GBP 70 a week.
Tudi tožeča stranka v postopku v glavni stvari pod točko 1 prejema v zameno za njeno delo brezplačno stanovanje in hrano ter 70 GBP na teden.
In its caselaw on Article 39 EC, the Court has already held that it is not relevant, for determining whether someone is to be regarded as a worker, that his remuneration is paid in the form of board and lodging and pocket money. 7
Sodi�če je v svoji sodni praksi v zvezi s členom 39 ES že ugotovilo, da za vpra�anje, ali je treba nekoga opredeliti kot delavca, ni pomembno, ali se mu plačilo izplača v obliki brezplačnega stanovanja in hrane ter žepnine. 7
Nor does any different assessment of the status of worker of an au pair follow from the particular context of au pair placements.
Drugačna presoja statusa delavca osebe, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, tudi ne izhaja iz posebnega konteksta, v katerega je postavljena služba „au-pair“.
Employment as an au pair is admittedly intended primarily for the acquisition and improvement of foreign language knowledge by the au pair and for cultural exchange.
Služba „aupair“ naj bi bila sicer v prvi vrsti namenjena učenju in izbolj�anju znanja tujih jezikov oseb, ki opravljajo delo kot „aupair“, ter kulturni izmenjavi.
For an au pair, the au pair placement is thus associated particularly with benefits that go beyond the remuneration for her activities that she receives in the form of board and lodging and pocket money.
Za osebo, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, je služba „aupair“ tako v določeni meri povezana z ugodnostmi, ki niso omejene na plačilo njenega dela, ki ga dobi v obliki brezplačnega stanovanja in hrane poleg žepnine.
An au pair’s status of worker cannot, however, be excluded on the ground of that circumstance alone.
Samo na podlagi tega pa pri osebi, ki opravlja delo kot „aupair“, ni mogoče izključiti statusa delavca.
Other employment relationships too may be associated with benefits for the worker that go beyond the remuneration received.
Kajti tudi druga delovna razmerja so lahko povezana z ugodnostmi za delavca, ki niso omejene le na prejem plačila.