natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
COMPOSITIONThe Court is composed of four organs: the Presidency, the Judicial Divisions, the Office of the Prosecutor and the Registry. The Presidency is composed of the President and two Vice-presidents elected from the 18 judges of the Court.The 18 judges of the Court (this number may be increased), from around the world, are elected for a term of up to nine years by the Assembly of States Parties.
SESTAVASodišče je sestavljeno iz 4 organov: predsedstva, oddelkov, urada tožilca in sodnega tajni-štva.Predsedstvo je sestavljeno iz predsednika in dveh podpredsednikov, ki so izvoljeni izmed 18 sodnikov sodišča.Skupščina držav pogodbenic izvoli 18 sodnikov sodišča (to število se lahko poveča), ki priha- jajo z vsega sveta, za mandat 9 let.
They are divided into three divisions:• the Pre-Trial Division• the Trial Division• the Appeals Division.
Razporedijo se v tri oddelke:• predhodni oddelek,• obravnavni oddelek,• pritožbeni oddelek.
A third of the judges are elected every 3 years.The Office of the Prosecutor is headed by the Prosecutor who is assisted by a Deputy Prosecutor.
Vsaka 3 leta je na novo izvoljena tretjina sodnikov.Urad tožilca vodi tožilec, ki mu pomaga namestnik tožilca.
They are elected by the States Parties.
Izvolijo ju države pogodbenice.
The Registry is headed by the Registrar, who is elected by the judges.
Sodno tajništvo vodi sodni tajnik, ki ga izvolijo sodniki.
LANGUAGESThe working languages: English and French.
JEZIKIDelovna jezika: angleščina in francoščina.
At the request of a party to proceedings or a State authorised to intervene in proceedings, the Court, if it considers it justified, authorises the use by that party or that State of a language other than English or French. The official languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish.
Če sodišče meni, da je to utemeljeno, na predlog stranke v postopku ali države, ki ji je bilo dovoljeno intervenirati v postopku, dovoli, da ta stranka ali država uporablja jezik, ki ni angleščina ali francoščina.Uradni jeziki: angleščina, arabščina, kitajščina, španščina, francoščina in ruščina.
SPECIAL FEATURES• The ICC is an independent court; • The ICC is permanent; • The ICC has jurisdiction with regard to natural persons; • The ICC was established by a founding treaty (the Rome Statute), unlike the ad hoc criminal courts which were set up by resolutions of the UN Security
POSEBNOSTI• MKS je neodvisno sodišče;• MKS je stalno sodišče;• MKS je pristojno za fizične osebe;• MKS je bilo ustanovljeno z ustanovitveno pogodbo (Rimski statut), drugače kot ad hoc kazenska sodišča, ki so bila ustanovljena z resolucijamiVarnostnega Varnostnega sveta ZN;• države z ratifikacijo Rimskega statuta a priori priznavajo njegovo pristojnost;• Varnostni svet lahko na podlagi PoglavjaVII Listine Združenih narodov predloži
Council;• The States accept its jurisdiction presumptively by ratifying the Rome
MKS zadeve v obravnavo.
International Criminal Court - Maanweg, 174 - NL-2516 AB The Hague Tel : (+31) 70 515 85 15 - Internet: http://www.icc-cpi.int
Mednarodno kazensko sodišče - Maanweg, 174 - NL-2516 AB Den Haag Tel. (+31-70) 515 85 15 - Spletna stran: http://www.icc-cpi.int
Publication produced with the assistance of various departments of the Courts described
Izdajo so skupaj omogočile različne službe predstavljenih sodišč.
Edition of June 2010doi:10.2862/24839
Izdaja junij 2010doi:10.2862/2832
Court of Justice of the European Union Press and information L-2925 Luxembourg www. curia.europa.eu
Sodišče Evropske unije Mediji in informacije L-2925 Luxembourg www. curia.europa.eu
Composition, jurisdiction and procedures
Sestava, pristojnosti in postopki
To build Europe, certain States (now 27 in number) concluded treaties establishing first the European Communities and then the European Union, with institutions which adopt legal rules in specified areas.
Da bi zgradile Evropo, so države (danes jih je 27) med seboj sklenile pogodbe, skaterimi so bile ustanovljene Evropske skupnosti, pozneje pa Evropska unija, skupaj zinstitucijami, ki sprejemajo pravna pravila na določenih področjih.
With the entry into force, on 1 Decem-ber2009, of the Treaty of Lisbon, the European Union was endowed with legal personality and replaced the European Community.
Zzačetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe 1.decembra2009 je Evropska unija postala pravna oseba in je nadomestila Evropsko skupnost.
The Court of Justice of the European Union is the judicial institution of the European Union.
Sodišče Evropske unije je sodna institucija Unije.
It comprises 3 courts: the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal.
Sestavljajo ga tri sodišča: Sodišče, Splošno sodišče in Sodišče za uslužbence.
Its primary task is to review the legality of acts of the European Union’s institutions and to ensure the uniform interpretation and application of European Union law.
Njegovi temeljni nalogi sta, da nadzira zakonitost aktov institucij Unije in zagotavlja enotno razlago in uporabo prava Unije.
THE COMPOSITION OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE
SESTAVA SODIŠČA]
The Court of Justice is composed of 27 Judges and 8 Advocates General.
Sodišče sestavlja 27 sodnikov in 8generalnih pravobranilcev.
The Judges and Advocates General are appointed by common accord by the Governments of the Member States after consultation of a panel responsible for giving an opinion on the suitability of candidates to perform the duties in question.
Sodnike in generalne pravobranilce vmedsebojnem soglasju imenujejo vlade držav članic po posvetovanju zodborom, ki da mnenje oustreznosti kandidatov za opravljanje zadevnih funkcij.
They are appointed for a renewable term of six years.
Njihov mandat traja šest let in lahko so ponovno imenovani.
They are chosen from among lawyers whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the qualifications required for appointment, in their respective countries, to the highest judicial offices, or who are of recognised competence.
Izbrani so med pravniki, katerih neodvisnost je nedvomna in ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za imenovanje na najvišje sodniške položaje vsvojih državah ali so priznani pravniki.
The Judges of the Court elect from among themselves the President of the Court for a renewable term of three years.
Sodniki izvolijo predsednika Sodišča med svojimi člani za obdobje treh let zmožnostjo ponovne izvolitve.
The President directs the Court’s work and staff and presides at hearings and deliberations of the largest formations of the Court.
Predsednik vodi delo in službe Sodišča ter predseduje obravnavam in posvetovanjem večjih sestav.
The Advocates General assist the Court.
Sodišču pomagajo generalni pravobranilci.
They are responsible for presenting, with complete impartiality and independence, an ‘Opinion’ in the cases assigned to them.
Njihova naloga je, da vzadevah, ki so jim predložene, nepristransko in neodvisno podajo pravno mnenje, imenovano sklepni predlogi.
The Registrar is the institution’s Secretary General and manages its departments under the authority of the President of the Court.
Sodni tajnik je generalni sekretar institucije, katere službe vodi pod nadzorom predsednika Sodišča.
The Court may sit as a full court, in a Grand Chamber of 13 Judges or in Chambers of three or five Judges.
Sodišče lahko odloča na občni seji, vvelikem senatu (trinajst sodnikov) ali vsenatih treh oziroma petih sodnikov.
The Court sits as a full court in the particular cases prescribed by the Court’s Statute (proceedings to dismiss the European Ombudsman or a Member of the European Commission who has failed to full his or her obligations, etc.) and where the Court considers that a case is of exceptional importance.
Na občni seji odloča vposebnih primerih, določenih s Statutom Sodišča (če odloča orazrešitvi evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, komisarja, ki ni izpolnil svojih obveznosti, itd.), in kadar meni, da je zadeva izjemno pomembna.
It sits in a Grand Chamber when a Member State or an Institution which is a party to the proceedings so requests, and in particularly complex or important cases.
Vvelikem senatu odloča, če to zahteva država članica ali institucija, ki je stranka vpostopku, in vzadevah, ki so zelo zapletene ali posebej pomembne.
Other cases are heard by Chambers of three or five Judges.
Druge zadeve obravnavajo senati petih ali treh sodnikov.
The Presidents of the Chambers of five Judges are elected for three years, and those of the Chambers of three Judges for one year.
Predsedniki senatov petih sodnikov so izvoljeni za tri leta, predsedniki senatov treh sodnikov pa za eno leto.
To enable it properly to full its task, the Court has been given clearly defined jurisdiction, which it exercises on references for preliminary rulings and in various categories of proceedings.
Da bi Sodišče lahko dobro opravljalo nalogo, so mu bile podeljene natančno opredeljene sodne pristojnosti, ki jih izvaja vokviru postopka predhodnega odločanja in različnih vrst tožb.
THE VARIOUS TYPES OF PROCEEDINGS
VRSTE POSTOPKOV
REFERENCES FOR PRELIMINARY RULINGS
PREDHODNO ODLOČANJE
The Court of Justice cooperates closely with all the courts of the Member States, which are the ordinary courts in matters of European Union law.
Sodišče pri delu tesno sodeluje ssodišči držav članic, ki so redna sodišča prava Unije.
To ensure the effective and uniform application of European Union legislation and to prevent divergent interpretations, the national courts may, and sometimes must, refer to the Court of Justice to clarify the interpretation of European Union law, so that they may ascertain, for example, whether their national legislation complies with that law.
Da bi se zagotovila učinkovita in enotna uporaba zakonodaje Unije in da bi se preprečilo kakršno koli odstopanje, se nacionalni sodniki lahko obrnejo, včasih se morajo, na Sodišče za pojasnitev razlage prava Unije, da bi lahko na primer preverili skladnost nacionalne zakonodaje stem pravom.
A reference for a preliminary ruling may also concern the review of the validity of an act adopted by the European Union’s institutions.
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se lahko nanaša tudi na nadzor veljavnosti pravnih aktov, ki jih sprejmejo institucije Unije.
The Court of Justice’s reply is not merely an opinion, but takes the form of a judgment or reasoned order.
Sodišče ne odgovori zgolj zmnenjem, ampak ssodbo oziroma zobrazlože-nim sklepom.
The court which made the reference to the Court of Justice is, in deciding the dispute before it, bound by the interpretation given.
Nacionalno sodišče, ki se je obrnilo na Sodišče, je pri obravnavanju spora vezano na dano razlago.
The Court of Justice’s judgment likewise binds other national courts before which the same problem is raised.
Sodba Sodišča je zavezujoča tudi za druga nacionalna sodišča, ki bi odločala oenakem problemu.
It is thus through references for preliminary rulings that any European citizen can seek clari cation of the European Union’s rules which a ect him.
V okviru predhodnega odločanja lahko tudi vsak evropski državljan pridobi pojasnilo glede določb prava Unije, ki ga zadevajo.
Although such a reference can be made only by a national court, all the parties to the proceedings before that court, the Member States and the European Union’s institutions may take part in the proceedings before the Court of Justice.
Čeprav lahko tak postopek sproži samo nacionalno sodišče, lahko vse stranke pred tem sodiščem, države članice in institucije Unije sodelujejo vpostopku pred Sodiščem.
In that way, a number of important principles of European Union law have been established on the basis of questions referred for preliminary rulings, sometimes by national courts of first instance.
Več pomembnih načel prava Unije je bilo opredeljenih na podlagi vprašanj za predhodno odločanje, ki so jih včasih predložila nacionalna sodišča prve stopnje.
ACTIONS FOR FAILURE TO FULFIL OBLIGATIONS
TOŽBA ZARADI NEIZPOLNITVE OBVEZNOSTI
These actions enable the Court of Justice to determine whether Member States have fulfilled their obligations under European Union law.
Ta tožba omogoča Sodišču nadzor nad tem, ali države članice spoštujejo obveznosti, ki jih imajo na podlagi prava Unije.
Before bringing the case before the Court of Justice, the Commission conducts an administrative stage in which the Member State concerned is given the opportunity to reply to the complaints against it.
Preden Komisija zadevo predloži Sodišču, opravi upravno fazo, vkateri da zadevni državi članici možnost, da odgovori na očitke.
If, at the conclusion of that stage, the Member State has not put an end to the infringement, an action may be brought before the Court of Justice.
Če država članica po tej fazi svojih obveznosti ne izpolni, je mogoče pri Sodišču vložiti tožbo.
The action may be brought either by the Commission – as is usually the case – or by a Member State.
Postopek lahko sproži ali Komisija –kar je najpogosteje –ali druga država članica.
If the Court of Justice finds that an obligation has not been fulfilled, the State in question must put an end to the infringement without delay.
Če Sodišče ugotovi, da obveznost ni bila izpolnjena, jo mora zadevna država članica brez odlašanja izpolniti.
If, after a further action is brought by the Commission, the Court of Justice finds that the Member State concerned has not complied with its judgment, it may impose on it a fixed or periodic
Če Sodišče, potem ko je Komisija sprožila nov postopek, ugotovi, da zadevna država članica ni izvršila njegove sodbe, ji lahko naloži plačilo pavšalnega zneska in/ali denarne kazni.
By an action for annulment, the applicant seeks the annulment of a measure (in particular a regulation, directive or decision) adopted by an institution, body, office or agency of the European Union.
S to tožbo tožeča stranka zahteva razglasitev ničnosti akta institucije, organa, urada ali agencije Unije (zlasti uredbe, direktive ali odločbe).
The Court of Justice has exclusive jurisdiction over actions between the institutions and those brought by a Member State against the European Parliament and/or against the Council (apart from Council measures in respect of State aid, dumping and implementing powers).
Vpristojnosti Sodišča so tožbe ene institucije proti drugi ter tožbe države članice proti Evropskemu parlamentu in/ali Svetu (razen proti aktom zadnjega spodročja državnih pomoči, dampinga in izvršilnih pooblastil).
The General Court has jurisdiction, at first instance, in all other actions of this type and, particularly, in actions brought by individuals and those brought by Member States against acts of the Commission.
Splošno sodišče je pristojno za obravnavanje vseh drugih tovrstnih tožb na prvi stopnji, predvsem tožb, ki jih vložijo posamezniki, in tožb držav članic zoper akte Komisije.
ACTIONS FOR FAILURE TO ACT
TOŽBA ZARADI NEDELOVANJA
These actions enable review of the lawfulness of failure to act by a European Union institution, body, office or agency.
Ta tožba omogoča nadzor zakonitosti nedelovanja institucije, organa, urada ali agencije Unije.
However, such an action may be brought only after the institution concerned has been called on to act.
Vložiti jo je mogoče le po tem, ko je bila institucija pozvana kdelovanju.
Where the failure to act is held to be unlawful, it is for the institution, body, office or agency concerned to put an end to the failure by the adoption of appropriate measures.
Če se ugotovi nezakonitost opustitve, mora zadevna institucija, organ, urad ali agencija sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za prenehanje nedelovanja.
Appeals limited to points of law may be brought before the Court of Justice against judgments and orders of the General Court.
Pri Sodišču je mogoče vložiti pritožbe, omejene na pravna vprašanja, zoper sodbe in sklepe Splošnega sodišča.
If the appeal is admissible and well founded, the Court of Justice sets aside the General Court’s decision.
Če je pritožba dopustna in utemeljena, Sodišče odločbo Splošnega sodišča razveljavi.
Where the state of the proceedings so permits, the Court of Justice may itself decide the case.
Če stanje postopka to dovoljuje, lahko Sodišče samo odloči osporu.
Otherwise, it must refer the case back to the General Court, which is bound by the decision given on the appeal.
Vnasprotnem primeru mora zadevo vrniti Splošnemu sodišču, ki je vezano na odločitev vpritožbi.
Decisions of the General Court on appeals against decisions of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal may, in exceptional circumstances, be reviewed by the Court of Justice where there is a serious risk of the unity or consistency of European Union law being affected. ected.
Odločitve Splošnega sodišča opritožbah zoper odločitve Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije so lahko izjemoma predmet revizijskega postopka Sodišča, če obstaja resno tveganje za enotnost ali doslednost prava Unije.
Whatever the type of case, there is, as a general rule, a written stage and an oral stage, which is public.
Ne glede na naravo zadeve ta na splošno zajema pisni in ustni postopek, ki je javen.
However, a distinction must be drawn between, on the one hand, references for preliminary rulings and, on the other, other actions, known as ‘direct actions’.
Vendar je treba razlikovati med postopki predhodnega odločanja in drugimi postopki, tako imenovanimi direktnimi tožbami.
COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT AND THEWRITTEN PROCEDURE
PREDLOŽITEV SODIŠČU IN PISNI POSTOPEK
■in references for preliminary rulings
■pri predhodnem odločanju
The national court submits questions to the Court of Justice about the interpretation or validity of a provision of European Union law, generally in the form of a judicial decision in accordance with the national procedural rules.
Nacionalno sodišče vprašanja orazlagi ali veljavnosti določbe prava Unije Sodišču navadno predloži ssodno odločbo vskladu znacionalnimi postopkovnimi pravili.
When that request has been translated by the Court’s translation service into all the languages of the European Union, the Registry notifies it to the parties to the national proceedings, and also to all the Member States and institutions of the European Union.
Ko je predlog vprevajalski službi Sodišča preveden vvse jezike Unije, ga sodno tajništvo ne vroči samo strankam postopka vglavni stvari, ampak tudi državam članicam in institucijam Evropske unije.
A notice is published in the Official Journal of the European Union stating, inter alia, the names of the parties to the proceedings and the content of the questions.
Sodno tajništvo poskrbi za to, da se v Uradnem listu Evropske unije objavi obvestilo znavedbo strank in vsebino vprašanj.
The parties, the Member States and the institutions have two months within which to submit any written observations to the Court of Justice.
Stranke, države članice in zgoraj navedene institucije lahko Sodišču vdveh mesecih predložijo morebitna pisna stališča.
■in direct actions
■pri direktnih tožbah
An action before the Court must be brought by application addressed to its Registry.
Zadeva mora biti predložena Sodišču spisno vlogo, naslovljeno na sodno tajništvo Sodišča.
The Registrar publishes a notice of the action in the Official Journal of the European Union, setting out the applicant’s claims and arguments.
Sodni tajnik objavi obvestilo otožbi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, vkaterem navede tožbene razloge in predloge tožeče stranke.
At the same time, the application is served on the party sued, who has one month within which to lodge a defence.
Hkrati se tožba vroči nasprotni stranki, ki ima mesec dni časa, da vloži odgovor na tožbo.
The applicant may lodge a reply and the defendant a rejoinder, the time allowed being one month in each case.
Tožeča stranka ima pravico do replike, tožena stranka pa do duplike; za vložitev obeh je rok mesec dni.
The time-limits for lodging these documents must be complied with unless an extension is granted by the President.
Roke za vložitev teh dokumentov je treba spoštovati, razen če jih predsednik izrecno podaljša.
In both types of action, a Judge-Rapporteur and an Advocate General, responsible for monitoring the progress of the case, are appointed by the President and the First Advocate General respectively.
V obeh postopkih predsednik in prvi generalni pravobranilec določita sodnika poročevalca in generalnega pravobranilca, ki sta zadolžena za spremljanje poteka zadeve.
PREPARATORY INQUIRIES AND THE REPORT FOR THE HEARING
PRIPRAVLJALNE POIZVEDBE IN POROČILO ZA OBRAVNAVO
In all cases, once the written procedure is closed, the parties are asked to state, within three weeks, whether and why they wish a hearing for oral argument to be held.
Ko je pisni postopek končan, se stranke vvseh postopkih pozove, naj vroku treh tednov sporočijo, ali predlagajo izvedbo ustne obravnave in zakaj.
The Court decides, after reading the report of the Judge-Rapporteur and hearing the views of the Advocate General, whether any particular preparatory inquiries are needed, to what type of formation the case should be assigned, and whether a hearing should be held for oral argument, for which the President will x the date.
Sodišče po seznanitvi sporočilom sodnika poročevalca in po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca odloči, ali je vzadevi potreben kateri od pripravljalnih ukrepov, vkateri sestavi bo Sodišče obravnavalo zadevo in ali je treba izvesti ustno obravnavo, narok za katero določi predsednik.
The Judge-Rapporteur summarises, in a Report for the Hearing, the facts alleged and the
To poročilo je na obravnavi objavljeno vjeziku postopka.
THE HEARING AND THE ADVOCATE GENERAL’S OPINION
JAVNA OBRAVNAVA IN SKLEPNI PREDLOGI GENERALNEGA PRAVOBRANILCA
The case is argued at a public hearing, before the formation to which it was assigned and the Advocate General.
Zadeva se obravnava na javni obravnavi pred sestavo Sodišča, ki ji je bila dodeljena, in generalnim pravobranilcem.
The Judges and the Advocate General may put to the parties any questions they consider appropriate.
Sodniki in generalni pravobranilec lahko strankam postavljajo vprašanja, za katera menijo, da so primerna.
Some weeks later, the Advocate General delivers his or her Opinion before the Court of Justice, again in open court.
Generalni pravobranilec čez nekaj tednov spet na javni obravnavi Sodišču predstavi svoje sklepne predloge.
He or she analyses in detail the legal aspects of the case and suggests completely independently to the Court the response which he or she considers should be given to the problem raised.
Vnjih podrobno razčleni predvsem pravne vidike spora in Sodišču, od katerega je popolnoma neodvisen, predlaga rešitev problema, za katero meni, da bi jo bilo treba sprejeti.
This marks the end of the oral procedure.
Tako se konča ustni del postopka.
If the Court decides that the case raises no new question of law, it may decide, after hearing the Advocate General, to give judgment without an Opinion.
Če Sodišče meni, da zadeva ne načenja novega pravnega vprašanja, lahko po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca odloči, da bo razsodilo brez sklepnih predlogov.
The Judges deliberate on the basis of a draft judgment drawn up by the Judge- Rapporteur.
Podlaga za posvetovanje sodnikov je osnutek sodbe, ki ga sestavi sodnik poročevalec.
Each Judge of the formation concerned may propose changes.
Vsak sodnik vzadevni sestavi lahko predlaga spremembe.
Decisions of the Court of Justice are taken by majority and no record is made public of any dissenting opinions.
Odločitve Sodišča so sprejete zvečino glasov in brez morebitnih ločenih mnenj.
Judgments are signed by all the Judges who took part in the deliberation and their operative part is pronounced in open court.
Sodbe podpišejo vsi sodniki, ki so sodelovali pri odločanju, njihov izrek pa se razglasi na javni obravnavi.
Judgments and the Opinions of the Advocates General are available on the Court’s internet site on the day they are delivered.
Sodbe so na voljo na spletni strani Sodišča na dan razglasitve, sklepni predlogi generalnih pravobranilcev pa na dan predstavitve.
They are, in most cases, subsequently published in the Reports of Cases before the Court of Justice and the General Court (ECR).
Vvečini primerov se objavijo v Zbirki odločb sodne prakse Sodišča in Splošnega sodišča.
■The simplified procedure
■Poenostavljeni postopek