natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(European Parliament and Council Directive 96/71)
(Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 96/71)
Freedom to provide services — Restrictions — Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services
Svoboda opravljanja storitev – Omejitve – Napotitev delavca na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev
(Art. 49 EC; European Parliament and Council Directive 96/71, Art. 3(1))
(člen 49 ES; Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 96/71, člen 3(1))
in the framework of the transnational provision of services.
podjetjem s sedežem v drugih državah članicah.
(see paras 26, 30, 31)
(Glej točke 26, 30 in 31.)
Therefore, such a rate of pay cannot be considered to constitute a minimum rate of pay within the meaning of Article 3(1)(c) of Directive 96/71 which Member States are entitled to impose, pursuant to that directive, on undertakings established in other Member States,
Člena 3(7) Direktive 96/71 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev ni mogoče razlagati tako, da državi članici gostiteljici omogoča, da izvajanje storitev na svojem ozemlju pogojuje z upo�tevanjem pogojev za delo in zaposlitev, ki presegajo prisilne predpise glede minimalnega varstva.
Article 3(7) of Directive 96/71 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services cannot be interpreted as allowing the host Member State to make the provision of services in its territory conditional on the observance of terms
Zakonski ukrep, s katerim se naročniku predpi�e, da lahko za izvedbo javnih naročil za gradnje izbere le podjetja, ki se ob oddaji ponudbe pisno zavežejo, da bodo svojim delavcem za izvajanje zadevnih storitev izplačevala najmanj tak�no plačo, kot je določena v veljavni kolektivni pogodbi v kraju, kjer se te storitve izvajajo, pri čemer navedene pogodbe ni mogoče opredeliti kot splo�no veljavno, urne postavke ne določa v skladu z eno od možnosti, opredeljenih v členu 3(1), prvi pododstavek, prva in druga alinea, in (8), druga alinea, Direktive 96/71 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev.
A Member State is not entitled to impose, pursuant to Directive 96/71, on undertakings established in other Member States, a rate of pay provided for by a collective agreement in force at the place where the services concerned are performed and not declared to be of general application, by requiring, by a measure of a legislative nature, the contracting authority to designate as contractors for public works contracts only contractors which, when submitting their tenders, agree in writing to pay their employees, in return for performance of the services concerned, at least the wage provided for in the collective agreement.
Zato je s pridržkom možnosti, ki jo imajo podjetja s sedežem v drugih državah članicah, da v državi članici gostiteljici, predvsem v okviru obveznosti, ki jo imajo do svojega napotenega osebja, prostovoljno pristopijo h kolektivni pogodbi, ki je morebiti ugodnej�a, raven varstva, ki ga je treba zagotoviti napotenim delavcem na ozemlju države članice gostiteljice, načeloma omejena z ravnijo varstva, predvidenega v členu 3(1), prvi pododstavek, točke od (a) do (g), Direktive 96/71, če navedeni delavci ne uživajo ugodnej�ih pogojev za delo in zaposlitev v zvezi z zadevami, določenimi v navedeni določbi, že na podlagi zakona ali kolektivnih pogodb v matični državi članici.
Directive 96/71 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, read in the light of Article 49 EC, precludes an authority of a Member State from adopting a measure of a legislative nature requiring the contracting authority to designate as contractors for public works contracts only contractors which, when submitting their tenders, agree in writing to pay their employees, in return for performance of the services concerned, at least the wage provided for in the collective agreement in force at the place where those services
Direktiva 96/71 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev v skladu z razlago z vidika člena 49 ES nasprotuje zakonskemu ukrepu, s katerim organ države članice naročniku predpi�e, da lahko za izvedbo javnih naročil za gradnje izbere le podjetja, ki se ob oddaji ponudbe pisno zavežejo, da bodo svojim delavcem za izvajanje zadevnih storitev izplačevala najmanj tak�no plačo, kot je določena v veljavni kolektivni pogodbi
SUMMARY — CASE C-346/06 are performed, where that remuneration was not determined by one of the means laid down in Article 3(1) and (8) of the directive.
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-346/06 v kraju, kjer se te storitve izvajajo, če ta plača ni določena v skladu z eno od možnosti, predvidenih v členu 3(1) in (8) Direktive.
collective agreement is applicable, as a result of the legislation at issue, only to a part of the construction sector, since, first, that legislation applies solely to public contracts and not to private contracts and, second, that collective agreement has not been declared universally applicable, and inasmuch as there is no evidence to support the conclusion that the protection resulting from such a rate of pay is necessary for a construction sector worker only when he is employed in the context of a public works contract but not when he is employed in the context of a private contract.
se navedena zakonodaja nana�a le na javna, ne pa tudi na zasebna naročila in ker navedena kolektivna pogodba ni bila razgla�ena za splo�no veljavno – in če ni mogoče ugotoviti, da je varstvo, ki izhaja iz take urne postavke, za delavca v gradbenem sektorju nujno le, če je zaposlen v okviru javnega naročila za gradnje, ne pa tudi če dela v okviru zasebnega naročila.
By requiring undertakings performing public works contracts and, indirectly, their subcontractors to apply the minimum wage laid down by such a collective agreement, such legislation may impose on service providers established in another Member State where minimum rates of pay are lower an additional economic burden that may prohibit, impede or render less attractive the provision of their services in the host Member State.
Zakonodaja, ki izbranim ponudnikom za izvedbo javnih naročil za gradnje in, posredno, njihovim podizvajalcem nalaga, naj izplačujejo najmanj tak�no plačo, kot je določena v taki kolektivni pogodbi, lahko s tem ponudnikom storitev s sedežem v drugi državi članici, kjer so minimalne plače nižje, naloži dodatne ekonomske stro�ke, ki lahko privedejo do prepovedi, ovir ali zmanj�anja privlačnosti izvajanja njihovih storitev v državi gostiteljici.
Therefore, such a measure is capable of constituting a restriction within the meaning of Article 49 EC.
Zato lahko tak ukrep pomeni omejitev v smislu člena 49 ES.
For the same reasons, the restriction also cannot be considered to be justified by the objective of ensuring protection for independence in the organisation of working life by trade unions.
Take omejitve ni mogoče upravičiti s ciljem varstva delavcev, če urna postavka, določena s tako kolektivno pogodbo, na podlagi zadevne zakonodaje zavezuje le del gradbenega sektorja – ker
(see paras 36-43, operative part)
(Glej točke od 36 do 43 in izrek.)
BOTdelivered on 20 September 2007
SKLEPNI PREDLOGI GENERALNEGA PRAVOBRANILCAYVESA BOTA, predstavljeni 20. septembra 2007 1
This reference for a preliminary ruling will allow the Court to build on its existing caselaw on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services.
Ta predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe bo Sodi�ču omogočil, da bo izoblikovalo svojo sodno prakso v zvezi s problematiko napotitve delavcev v okviru opravljanja storitev.
that may go as far as the termination of the works contract, where the collective agreement to which the legislation in question refers is not declared to be of universal application.
plačo, določeno s kolektivno pogodbo, ki se uporablja v kraju, kjer se storitve izvajajo, v nasprotnem primeru lahko sankcije privedejo celo do razdrtja podjemne pogodbe, kadar kolektivna pogodba, na katero napotuje ta zakonodaja, ni razgla�ena za splo�no uporabno.
The question raised by the court making the reference once again calls on the Court to strike a balance between the freedom to provide services, on the one hand, and the overriding requirements of the protection of workers and the prevention of social dumping, on the other.
Vpra�anje, ki ga je zastavilo predložitveno sodi�če, namreč ponovno poziva Sodi�če, naj poi�če ravnovesje med svobodo opravljanja storitev in zahtevami v zvezi z varstvom delavcev in preprečevanjem socialnega dampinga.
That question has been raised in the course of a dispute between Rechtsanwalt Dr. Dirk Rüffert, in his capacity as liquidator of the company Objekt und Bauregie GmbH & Co. KG, defendant in the main proceedings, and Land Niedersachsen, applicant and respondent (‘the applicant’) in the main proceedings, regarding the termination of a works contract between the company and Land Niedersachsen in the context of a public works contract. 3.
Dirk Rüffert als Insolvenzverwalter über das Vermögen der Objekt und Bauregie GmbH & Co. KG (odvetnik Rüffert, sodni upravitelj premoženja družbe Objekt und Bauregie GmbH & Co. KG), toženo stranko v sporu o glavni stvari, in Land Niedersachsen (v nadaljevanju: dežela Spodnja Sa�ka), tožečo stranko v sporu o glavni stvari, zaradi razdrtja podjemne pogodbe, ki sta jo ta družba in ta dežela sklenili v okviru javnega naročila gradnje. 3.
More precisely, the Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court), Celle (Germany), essentially asks the Court to rule whether Community law must be interpreted as precluding national legislation on the award of public contracts that requires contractors and, indirectly, their subcontractors to pay workers posted in the framework of the performance of a public contract at least the remuneration prescribed by the collective agreement in force at the place where those services are performed, on pain of penalties
Natančneje, Oberlandesgericht Celle (Nemčija) v bistvu zapro�a Sodi�če, naj se izreče o vpra�anju, ali je pravo Skupnosti treba razlagati tako, da nasprotuje nacionalni zakonodaji o oddaji javnih naročil, ki zahteva, naj izbrani ponudniki in, posredno, njihovi podizvajalci delavcem, ki so napoteni v okviru izvedbe javnega naročila, izplačajo najmanj
In this Opinion, I shall show why, in my view, neither Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting
V teh sklepnih predlogih bom dokazal, zakaj se po mojem mnenju niti Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 96/71/ES z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev
Article 1 of that directive, headed ‘Scope’, is worded as follows: preted as precluding a national measure such as the one at issue in the main proceedings.
V členu 1 te direktive z naslovom „Področje uporabe“ je določeno: na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev 2niti člen 49 ES ne smeta razlagati tako, da nasprotujeta nacionalnemu ukrepu, kot je ukrep, ki se obravnava v postopku v glavni stvari.
This Directive shall apply to undertakings established in a Member State which, in the framework of the transnational provision of services, post workers, in accordance with paragraph 3, to the territory of a Member State.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za podjetja s sedežem v kateri od držav članic, ki v okviru čezmejnega opravljanja storitev napotijo delavce v skladu s členom 3 na ozemlje katere od držav članic.
This Directive shall apply to the extent that the undertakings referred to in paragraph 1 take one of the following transnational measures:
Ta direktiva se uporablja, kolikor podjetja iz odstavka 1 uporabljajo katerega od naslednjih čezmejnih ukrepov:
The first paragraph of Article 49 EC lays down that restrictions on the freedom to provide services within the Community are prohibited in respect of nationals of Member States who are established in a State of the Community other than that of the person for whom the services are intended.
Člen 49, prvi odstavek, ES določa, da se omejitve svobode opravljanja storitev v Skupnosti prepovejo za državljane držav članic, ki imajo sedež v eni od držav Skupnosti, vendar ne v državi osebe, ki so ji storitve namenjene.
(a) post workers to the territory of a Member State on their account and under their direction, under a contract concluded between the undertaking making the posting and the party for whom the services are intended, operating in that Member State, provided there is an employment relationship between the undertaking making the posting and the worker during the period of posting
(a) napotijo delavce na ozemlje katere od držav članic na lasten račun in pod lastnim vodstvom na podlagi pogodbe, sklenjene med podjetjem, ki je delavce napotilo, in pogodbenico, kateri so storitve namenjene, pod pogojem, da v času napotitve obstaja delovno razmerje med podjetjem, ki delavca napoti, in delavcem,
Directive 96/71 aims to promote the freedom to provide services between Member States while ensuring fair competition between undertakings providing services and guaranteeing respect for the rights of workers. 3
Direktiva 96/71 naj bi razvijala svobodo opravljanja storitev med državami članicami z zagotavljanjem lojalne konkurence med podjetji ponudniki storitev in z varovanjem spo�tovanja pravic delavcev 3.
RÜFFERT d’application immédiate’ or ‘lois de police’ that obtain at the place where the work is carried out, are not defined in the Rome Convention.
„prisilne določbe“, ki prevladujejo v kraju izvr�itve dela, niso natančneje določeni s to konvencijo.
As evidenced by the sixth recital in the preamble to the directive, the Community legislature set out from the finding that, in transnational situations, the employment relationships of posted workers raise problems with regard to the legislation applicable to them.
Kot priča �esta uvodna izjava navedene direktive, je zakonodajalec Skupnosti izhajal iz ugotovitve, da se s čezmejnostjo delovnega razmerja pojavijo problemi glede tega, katero pravo se zanj uporablja.
In this context, the contribution of Directive 96/71 is to designate at Community level a number of mandatory rules in transnational posting situations.
V zvezi s tem Rimska konvencija o veljavnem pravu v obligacijskih razmerjih, dana v podpis v Rimu 19. junija 1980 4, določa splo�na merila za izbiro prava, ki velja za delovno razmerje 5. Člen 3 te konvencije
In this regard, the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, opened for signature in Rome on 19 June 1980, 4lays down general criteria for determining the law applicable to the employment relationship.
V tem okviru je prispevek Direktive 96/71 vzpostavitev določenega �tevila obveznih predpisov za primere čezmejne napotitve na delo na ravni Skupnosti 6.
5For example, Article 3 of the Convention provides that, as a general rule, the parties are free to choose the applicable law.
Prav tako je izraz načela prednosti prava Skupnosti, določenega v členu 20 Rimske konvencije, v skladu s katerim konvencija ne vpliva na uporabo določb, ki za posamezni primer določijo kolizijsko normo v obligacijskem razmerju in ki jih vsebujejo akti institucij Evropskih skupnosti ali nacionalna zakonodaja, usklajena skozi izvajanje takih aktov 7.
In the absence of choice, the contract of employment is governed, under Article 6(2) of the Convention, by the law of the country in which the employee habitually carries out his work, even if he is temporarily employed in another country.
predvideva, da pogodbene stranke praviloma same izberejo veljavno pravo. Kadar to ni izbrano, se v skladu s členom 6(2) navedene konvencije v zvezi s pogodbo uporablja pravo države, v kateri delavec pri izvajanju pogodbe običajno opravlja delo, tudi če je začasno zaposlen v drugi državi.
In order to reconcile the different objectives it pursues, Directive 96/71 thus coordinates the laws of the Member States ‘in order to lay down a nucleus of mandatory rules for minimum protection to be observed in the host country by employers who post workers to perform temporary work in the territory of a Member State where the services are provided’. 8
Da bi uskladila različne cilje, ki jih zasleduje, Direktiva 96/71 tako usklajuje zakonodaje držav članic, „tako da je določeno jedro prisilnih predpisov glede minimalne za�čite, ki jih morajo v državi gostiteljici spo�tovati delodajalci, ki napotujejo svoje delavce, da opravijo začasno delo na ozemlju države članice, kjer se opravlja storitev“ 8.
In addition, Article 7 of the Rome Convention lays down, subject to certain conditions, that effect may be given, concurrently with the law declared applicable, to the mandatory rules of the law of another country, in particular the law of the Member State within whose territory the worker is temporarily posted.
Poleg tega člen 7 Rimske konvencije določa, da lahko hkrati s pravom, določenim, da se uporabi, ob upo�tevanju nekaterih pogojev veljajo tudi prisilni predpisi druge države, zlasti prava države članice, na ozemlje katere je delavec začasno razporejen.
These mandatory rules, which are also known in French as ‘lois
Ti prisilni predpisi, drugače poimenovani „zakoni neposredne uporabe“ ali
6 — See the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 25 July 2003 on the implementation of Directive 96/71 in the Member States (COM(2003) 458 final, point 2.3.1.1).
6 – Glej sporočilo Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z dne 25. julija 2003 o izvajanju Direktive 96/71 v državah članicah (COM(2003) 458 konč., točka 2.3.1.1).
5 — See the seventh to tenth recitals in the preamble to Directive 96/71.
1, v nadaljevanju: Rimska konvencija.5 – Glej od sedme do desete uvodne izjave Direktive 96/71.
7 — Eleventh recital.8 — Thirteenth recital.
7 – Enajsta uvodna izjava.8 – Trinajsta uvodna izjava.
According to the 17th recital in the preamble to the directive, ‘the mandatory rules for minimum protection in force in the host country must not prevent the application of terms and conditions of employment which are more favourable to workers’.
V skladu s sedemnajsto uvodno izjavo te direktive „prisilni predpisi o minimalni za�čiti, ki veljajo v državi gostiteljici, ne smejo onemogočati uporabe pogojev za delo in zaposlitev, ki so za delavce ugodnej�i“.
These principles are described in detail in Article 3 of that directive, headed ‘Terms and conditions of employment’, which is worded as follows:
Ta načela so podrobneje urejena v členu 3 navedene direktive z naslovom „Določbe in pogoji za zaposlitev“, ki določa:
(c) the minimum rates of pay, including overtime rates; this point does not apply to supplementary occupational retirement pension schemes;
(c) minimalne urne postavke, tudi za nadurno delo; ta točka se ne uporablja za programe dodatnega kolektivnega pokojninskega zavarovanja;
Member States shall ensure that, whatever the law applicable to the employment relationship, the undertakings referred to in Article 1(1) guarantee workers posted to their territory the terms and conditions of employment covering the following matters which, in the Member State where the work is carried out, are laid down:
Države članice poskrbijo, da ne glede na to, katera zakonodaja se uporablja za delovno razmerje, podjetja iz člena 1(1) zagotovijo delavcem, ki so napoteni na njihovo ozemlje, pogoje za delo in zaposlitev v zvezi z naslednjimi zadevami, ki so urejene v državi članici, v kateri se opravlja delo:
For the purposes of this Directive, the concept of minimum rates of pay referred to in paragraph 1(c) is defined by the national law and/or practice of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
V tej direktivi je koncept minimalnih urnih postavk iz odstavka 1 točke (c) opredeljen z nacionalno zakonodajo in/ali prakso države članice, na katere ozemlje je delavec napoten.
— by law, regulation or administrative provision, and/or
– z zakonom ali drugim predpisom
9 — ‘[A]ll building work relating to the construction, repair, upkeep, alteration or demolition of buildings’.
9 – Gre za „vse gradbene dejavnosti, ki zadevajo izvedbo, prenovitev, spremembo ali odstranitev zgradb“.
Paragraphs 1 to 6 shall not prevent application of terms and conditions of employment which are more favourable to workers.
Odstavki od 1 do 6 ne onemogočajo uporabe za delavce ugodnej�ih pogojev za delo in zaposlitev.
— collective agreements which have been concluded by the most representative employers’ and labour organisations at national level and which are applied throughout national territory,
kolektivne pogodbe, sklenjene med najbolj reprezentativnimi organizacijami delodajalcev in delavcev na nacionalni ravni in ki se jih uporablja na ozemlju celotne države,
… provided that their application to the undertakings referred to in Article 1(1) ensures equality of treatment on matters listed in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 of this Article between those undertakings and the other undertakings referred to in this subparagraph which are in a similar position.
[…] pod pogojem, da njihova uporaba s strani podjetij iz člena 1(1) zagotavlja v zadevah, navedenih v prvem pododstavku odstavka 1 tega člena, enako obravnavanje v teh podjetjih in v drugih podjetjih iz tega pododstavka, ki so v podobnem položaju.
“Collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable’ means collective agreements or arbitration awards which must be observed by all undertakings in the geographical area and in the profession or industry concerned.
Kolektivne pogodbe ali arbitražne odločbe, razgla�ene za splo�no uporabne, pomenijo kolektivne pogodbe ali arbitražne odločbe, ki jih morajo spo�tovati vsa podjetja na zadevnem geografskem območju in poklicu ali panogi.
Equality of treatment, within the meaning of this Article, shall be deemed to exist where national undertakings in a similar position:
Šteje se, da gre za enako obravnavanje v smislu tega člena, če nacionalna podjetja v podobnem položaju:
In the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application within the meaning of the first subparagraph, Member States may, if they so decide, base themselves on:
Če ni sistema za razglasitev kolektivnih pogodb ali arbitražnih odločb za splo�no veljavne [uporabne] v smislu prvega pododstavka, se lahko države članice odločijo, da izhajajo iz:
— are subject, in the place in question or in the sector concerned, to the same obligations as posting undertakings as regards the matters listed in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, and
– imajo v kraju, za katerega gre, ali v zadevni panogi enake obveznosti kot podjetje, ki je delavca napotilo, v zvezi z zadevami, navedenimi v prvem pododstavku odstavka 1 tega člena, kolektivnih pogodb ali arbitražnih odločb, ki imajo splo�en učinek za vsa podobna podjetja na zadevnem geografskem območju in poklicu ali in/ali in
— are required to fulfil such obligations with the same effects.
– pogojih za delo, ki jih je treba spo�tovati med izvedbo javnega naročila.
Finally, as regards the Community rules on public works contracts, I would point out that at the time of the events that gave rise to the dispute in the main proceedings Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts 10 was applicable. 11
Nazadnje glede pravil Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil za gradnje opozarjam, da se je Direktiva Sveta 93/37/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil za gradnje 10upora-bljala v času dejanskega stanja spora o glavni stvari 11.