natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In three of the five programmes audited there was verylittle to differentiate between training ac-tionsintendedexclusivelyfor womenandthoseopentoboth womenand men.
V treh od petih revidiranih pro-gramovjebilole malorazlike meddejavnostmiusposabljanja, namenjenimiizključnoženskam,intistimi,kiso bile namenjene tako ženskam kot moškim.
Moreresourcesintheformoftrainingplaces weresimply made availablefor women.Incontrast,thesituation illustratedintextbox 2 was an example of goodtargeting.
Ženskamje bilo preprosto namenjenih več virov v obliki mest na usposabljanjih. Nasprotnoje bilo stanje, opisano v okviru 2, primer dobre ciljne usmerjenosti.
In Lombardy, there was no specific analysis regarding areas of female underrepresentation despite one aim of the measure being to reduce horizontal and vertical segregation.
V Lombardiji ni bilo specifične analize o področjih, na katerih so ženske premalo zastopane, čeprav je bil eden od namenov ukrepa zmanjšanje horizontalnega in vertikalnega razlikovanja po spolu.
The French programme mentioned sectors providing employment opportunities, without analysing their potential for the creation of job opportunities for women.
V francoskem programu so bili omenjeni sektorji, ki zagotavljajo možnosti za zaposlitev, ni pa bil analiziran njihov potencial za ustvarjanje možnosti za zaposlitev žensk.
One aim of the measure was to give priority to training measures with potential for employment development but which had hitherto tended not to include women.
Eden od namenov ukrepa je bil, da se prednost nameni ukrepom usposabljanja s potencialom za razvoj zaposlovanja, ki pa doslej običajno niso zajemali žensk.
However, there was no discussion of what type of measures were considered as falling into this category.
Vendar ni bilo nobene razprave o tem, katera vrsta ukrepov spada v to kategorijo.
14 Communication from the Commission on the implementation of gender mainstreaming in the Structural Funds’programming documents 2000–06, COM(2002) 748 final dated 20.12.2002.
Sporočilo Komisije o izvajanju integracije načela enakosti v programskih dokumentih strukturnih skladov 2000–2006, COM(2002) 748 konč. z dne 20. decembra 2002.
The weak association betweenthe analysis oflabour markets and subsequent programme objectives could have been partially compensated for at projectlevel as project promoters were required to demonstrate how theirindividual projects took the characteristics oflocallabour marketsinto consideration.
Šibko povezavo med analizo trgov delain nadaljnjimi programskimi cilji bi bilo mogoče deloma nadomestiti naravni projekta,sajso morali nosilci projekta prikazati,kakoseje pri njihovih posameznih projektih upoštevaloznačilnostilokalnihtrgov dela.
However, the extent to which this compensation could take place depended upon thelevel ofinformation availableto promoters(seetextbox 3) and also on the quality ofthe projectselection process(see paragraph 29).
Vendar je bil obseg, v kateremje bilata nadomestitev možna, odvisen od stopnjeinformacij, kije bila na voljo nosilcem (glej okvir 3),in tudi od kakovosti procesaizbora projektov(glej odstavek 29).
Weaknesses ofthetype observedinthe programmes audited, and describedin paragraphs 25 and 26, were already wellknown.In a communication of the Commission from 200214,it was stated,in the context of the strategy to achieve gender equality, that ’in most of the programmes thereis a significant gap between the analysis and programming strategy’.
Tovrstneslabosti, ugotovljenevrevidiranih programihin opisane v odstavkih 25in 26,so bileže dobroznane. VSporočilu Komisi-jeizleta 200214,je bilov okvirustrategijeza doseganjeenakosti spolov navedeno, da v večini programov obstaja pomembna vrzel med analizoin strategijo programskega načrtovanja.
It went on to say that any analysis of the gapsarisingfromthe differentsocioeconomiccircumstances of women and men wasrare and, even when present,thestrategy to overcome such gaps was not always consistent with the analysis.
V njemje bilo navedenotudi, daseredko opravijoanalizerazlik,kise porajajo izrazličnihsocialno-ekonomskihrazmerženskin moških,kadar te analize obstajajo, pastrategija za odpravljanjetakšnihrazlik ni vednoskladnaz njimi.
In spite of such awareness at an early stageinthe programme period, the Commission did not take action onissues such as project selection,in an efforttoremedythe knownshortcomings.
Čeprav se je Komisija tega zavedala že na zgodnji stopnji programskega obdobja, pa pri vprašanjih, kotjeiz-bor projektov, ni ukrepala, da bi odpravila znane pomanjkljivosti.
The Sachsen-Anhalt programme targeted specific groups of women for inclusion in its traineeship schemes: the long-term unemployed, women over 45 years of age or single mothers who had previously participated in training but were still unemployed 3 to 12 months following the training.
Program Saška-Anhaltje bil usmerjen na vključevanje posebnih skupin žensk v sheme delovne prakse pri tem programu: dolgotrajno brezposelnih, žensk, starejših od 45 let, ali mater samohranilk, ki so se pred tem udeležile usposabljanja, vendar so bile 3 do 12 mesecev po njem še vedno brezposelne.
In the case of the Lombardy programme, the project promoters had to demonstrate coherence between the qualifications targeted and inter alia the established priorities of the region.
Pri lombardijskem programu so morali nosilci projekta dokazati skladnost med ciljnimi kvalifikacijami in med drugim prednostnimi nalogami, določenimi za regijo.
How-ever,information on regional priorities was notincluded with either the programme or the call for applications.
Vendar niti program niti javni razpis nista vsebovala informacij o regionalnih prednostnih nalogah.
PROJECT SELECTION DID NOT TAKE SUFFICIENT ACCOUNT OF THE ANALYSES OF LABOUR MARKETS NOR OF PROGRAMME OBJECTIVES
PRIIZBORU PROJEKTOV SE NISO DOVOLJ UPOŠTEVALI NITI ANALIZE TRGOV DELA NITI PROGRAMSKI CILJI
For three of the five programmes audited, the selection criteria did not ensurethattheissues arisingfromthelabour market analysis weresufficientlyaddressed nor provideasound basis for the attainment of programme objectives (see textbox 4).
Izbirna merila pritreh od petihrevidiranih programov niso zagotavljala zadostne obravnave vprašanj, ki izhajajo iz analize trga dela, pravtako pa niso zagotovilatrdne osnove za doseganje pro-gramskihciljev(glej okvir 4).
In one case, callsfor project proposals were notlinkedtoaspecific measure; instead projects were included as ’positive labour actions for women’ simply on the basis of the percentage of female trainees anticipated.
Venem primerurazpisizazbiranje projektnih predlogov niso bili povezani s specifičnim ukrepom. Namestotegaso bili projekti med pozitivne dejavnostizaženske na trgu dela zajeti preprosto na podlagi predvidenega deleža ženskih udeleženk usposabljanja.
In another case, whilstthe selection criteria stemmedfrom the main objectives of the measure, the criterion evaluating alink withlabour market priorities was not a determiningfactor whenit cametothe approval orrejection of projects.
V drugem primeru soizbirna merila sicerizviralaiz glavnih ciljev ukrepa, vendar merilo, s katerim seje vrednotila povezava s prednostnimi nalogami natrgu dela, ni bilo odločilni dejavnik pri odobritvi ali zavrnitvi projektov.
One of the objectives of the most important action implemented within the Andalusian programme ’actions for vocational training for women’ was that training courses should take into account local labour market conditions.
Pri najpomembnejši dejavnosti, izvedeni v okviru andaluzijskega programa ukrepov za poklicno usposabljanje žensk,je bil eden od ciljev, da bi bilotreba pritečajih usposabljanja upoštevati razmere na lokalnem trgu dela.
Five priority selection criteria were established by ’Ministerial Order’15 and three of these criteria focused on local conditions.
Z „ministrsko odredbo“15je bilo določenih pet prednostnih izbirnih meril, od katerih so bila tri osredotočena na lokalne razmere.
For two of these — ’commitment to take on the person trained’ and ’inclusion of traineeship in companies’ — most project applications did not include such commitments.
Pri dveh od teh meril – „zaveza o zaposlitvi usposobljene osebe“ in „vključitev delovne prakse v podjetjih“ – večina projektnih vlog ni zajemala takšnih zavez.
Data on the third criteria — ’employment rate regarding trainees of previous courses’ — were also often not included.
Prav tako pogosto niso bili vključeni podatki o tretjem merilu – „stopnja zaposlenosti tistih, ki so se usposabljali na prejšnjih tečajih“.
The mid-term evaluation of the Lombardy programme stated that the project selection process did not satisfactorily takeinto account training actions neededin sectors where genderimbal-ances were most prevalent, and also that not enough attention had been paid to various forms of discrimination and inequalitiy in access to the labour market.
V vmesnem vrednotenju lombardijskega programa je bilo navedeno, da se pri procesu izbora projektov niso zadovoljivo upoštevale dejavnosti usposabljanja, ki so potrebne v sektorjih, v katerih so neravnovesja med spoloma najizrazitejša, in da se ni namenilo dovolj pozornosti različnim oblikam diskriminacije in neenakosti pri dostopu do trga dela.
Although the audited measure of the Lombardy programme exclusively addressed women, the data show that 27 % of the training participants were male.
Čeprav je revidirani ukrep lombardijskega programa namenjen izključno ženskam, podatki kažejo, da je bilo 27 % udeležencev usposabljanja moških.
Ministerial Order (BOJA No 146, 19 December 2000, p. 18.647).
Ministrska odredba (BOJA št. 146, 19. december 2000, str. 18.647).
One ofthe main objectives ofthe measures wasthe promotion of womeninsectors wherethere wasa history offemale underrepresentation. Despite this, for three of the programmes audited there was still an emphasis on areas of traditional female employ-mentsuch as culture, health and cleaning.
Eden glavnih ciljev ukrepov je bilo večanje vloge žensk v sektorjih, kjerso bileženskev preteklosti premalozastopane.Kljubtemu jebilpritrehodrevidiranihprogramovpoudarekševednona področjih s tradicijo zaposlitve žensk, kot so kultura, zdravstvo in čiščenje.
Thelack ofspecifictarget groups meantthatthecandidatesse-lected were notalwaysthose mostin need ofsupportforentry orre-entryintothelabour market, asthe examplesintextbox 5 show.
Ker ni bilospecifičnihciljnihskupin, niso bili vednoizbranitisti kandidati, ki najbolj potrebujejo podporo pri vstopu ali ponovnem vstopu natrg dela, kot kažejo primeri v okviru 5.
The mid-term evaluation for the Lombardy programme found that training was mainly provided for people with an already ’strong’ position in the labour market (e.g. highly educated and/or young people who already had a good chance of finding a job without further training).
Pri vmesnem vrednotenju lombardijskega programa je bilo ugotovljeno, da je bilo usposabljanje večinoma zagotovljeno ljudem, ki so bili na trgu dela že v„močnem“ položaju (npr. visoko izobraženi in/ali mladi, ki so imeli tudi brez nadaljnjega usposabljanja dobre možnosti za zaposlitev).
For the biggest action in the Andalusian programme, a mid-term evaluation, for which the results were availablein 2005, concluded that the training measure was not suited to the needs of the women with the greatest difficulties as, on the one hand, the educationlevel required excluded women who had only been to primary school and, on the other hand, the training hours were not suited to women who had to care for their families.
Pri vmesnem vrednotenju največje dejavnosti andaluzijskega programa, katerega rezultati so bili na voljoleta 2005,je bilo ugotovljeno, da ukrep usposabljanja ni bil prilagojen potrebam žensk z največjimi težavami, saj so bile po eni strani zaradi zahtevane stopnje izobrazbe izločene ženske, ki so obiskovale samo osnovno šolo, po drugi strani pa čas, ko se je izvajalo usposabljanje, ni bil primeren za ženske, ki so morale skrbeti za družino.
DID MONITORINGINFORMATION MAKEIT POSSIBLE TO EVALUATE WHETHER VOCATIONAL TRAINING ACTIONS FOR WOMEN ACHIEVED THEIR OBJECTIVES?
ALI JE SPREMLJANJE OMOGOČILO, DA SE OVREDNOTI, ALI SO DEJAVNOSTI ZA POKLICNO USPOSABLJANJE ŽENSK DOSEGLE SVOJE CILJE?
Measuring the outcomes of training actionsis a difficult exercise because:
Izide dejavnosti usposabljanjajetežkoizmeriti:
(a) a number offactors externaltothetraining actions can play a majorrole withregardtotheemployability ofindividuals (e.g.evolution oflaboursupplyand demandresultingfrom the overall economicsituation);
(a) kerlahko prizaposljivosti posameznikovigrajovelikovlogo številni dejavniki, ki niso povezani z dejavnostmi usposabljanja (npr. spreminjanje ponudbe delovne silein povpraševanja po njej, kije posledicasplošnih gospodarskihrazmer);
(b)ESF-co-financedactionsareonlyonepartofa widerfield of actionimplemented within Member States which have an influence on employment; and
(b)ker so dejavnosti, sofinanciraneiz ESS,le del širšega področja dejavnosti,kiseizvajajovdržavahčlanicahinvplivajona zaposlovanje,ter
(c) certainresults are difficultto measure withinthecontext of theattainmentof programmeobjectives, butareofa beneficial naturein wider societal terms(e.g. re-learning how to adapt to routines including the respecting of time constraints, restoration ofself-confidence, etc.).
(c) kerjeza nekatererezultatetežkoizmeriti,ali dosegajo programske cilje, vendar so koristni za širšo družbo (npr. ponovno učenje prilagajanja delovnim postopkom, vključno sspoštovanjemrokov, povrnitevsamozaupanjaitd.).
In spite of such difficulties, some short- to medium-term achievements can still be measured.Indicators relevant to the objectives to be achieved could be established and corresponding targets set using benchmarks or other equivalent reference points regarding outputs, results andimpact.
Kljub takšnim težavam je vseeno mogočeizmeriti nekatere kratkoročne do srednjeročne dosežke. Možno je določiti kazalnike, povezane s cilji, kijihjetreba doseči,ter ustrezne cilje, ki se določijo s pomočjo meril za primerjanje uspešnosti ali drugih enakovrednih referenčnihtočkzaizložke,rezultatein učinek.
This would constitute a basisfor any subsequent monitoringand evaluation of measuresandactions and hencefor an appraisal oftheir effectiveness.
To bisestavljalo osnovo za vsako nadaljnje spremljanjein vrednotenje ukrepovin dejavnostiter zatotudi za oceno njihove uspešnosti.
The indicators were identified on
Kazalniki so bili opredeljeni
Thefollowingindicators provide a necessary minimumfor evaluating vocationaltraining actions16:
(a) kazalnikiizložkov:število udeleženk,številoizvedenihteča-jev;
(a) outputindicators: number of(female) participants, number of courses provided;
(b) kazalniki rezultatov: število udeležencev, ki končajo tečaj, število udeležencev, ki pridobijo zahtevane kvalifikacije,in
(b) results’ indicators: number of participants finishing courses, number of participants obtaining required qualifications; and the basis of a review by the Court of the programmes audited, of guidance issued by the European Commission in 1999 (’MEANS Collection’aimed at improving methods of evaluating structural policies) and of the specific 1999 Commission’s’Guidelinesforsystemsof monitoring and evaluation of ESF assistance in the period 2000–06.
(c) na podlagi pregleda, ki ga je Sodišče izvedlo v zvezi z revidiranimi programi, smernicami, ki jih je leta 1999 izdala Evropska komisija („zbirka MEANS“, namenjena izboljšanju metod za vrednotenje strukturnih politik) in specifičnimi „Smernicami za sisteme spremljanja in vrednotenja pomoči ESS v obdobju 2000–2006“, ki jih je Komisija izdala leta 1999.
(c) impactindicators:numberoftraineesgoingontofurther training, number oftraineesfinding ajob and who were still employed a stipulated time period(e.g. 6 or 12 months) after the end ofthe course.
kazalniki učinka: število udeležencev, ki so se udeležili nadaljnjega usposabljanja,število udeležencev, kiso dobilislužbo inso biliv določenemroku pokoncutečajaševednozapo-sleni(npr.šest ali 12 mesecev).
The Court examined whether:
Sodiščeje preučilo:
(a) appropriateindicatorshadbeenidentifiedandtargetsset for the measurement of output, results andimpact set outin paragraph 34;
(a) ali so bili za merjenjeizložkov, rezultatovin učinka, opisanih v odstavku 34, določeni primerni kazalnikiin cilji;
(b)the monitoringdatafortheseindicatorscollectedbythe bodiesimplementingthe actions werereliable; and
(b)ali so bili podatki o spremljanju teh kazalnikov, ki sojih zbrali organi, kiizvajajo dejavnosti, zanesljivi,in
(c) in asfar as could be ascertainedfromthe available monitoring data,thesetargets had been attained.
(c) ali so biliti cilji doseženi, v kolikorjeto mogoče ugotovitiiz razpoložljivih podatkov ospremljanju.
INDICATORS TOO NARROWLY FOCUSED
KAZALNIKI SO PREOZKO USMERJENI
Whilst outputindicators had been established for all audited programmes, the situation regarding results’ and impact indicators varied.
Medtemkoso bilikazalnikiizložkovvzpostavljenizavserevidi-rane programe, paje bilostanje gledekazalnikovrezultatovin učinka različno.
In one case both types of indicator existed, whereasin another,neitherhadbeenestablished.Intheremainingthree programmes, either results’ or impact indicators existed, but not both.
V enem primeru sta obstajali obe vrsti kazalnikov, v drugem pa niso bili vzpostavljeni ne eni ne drugi.
Thefollowing aspects were noted.
V preostalih treh programihso obstajalialikazalnikirezultatovalikazalniki učinka, ne pa oboji.
The employment situation from 6 to 12 months after the training wasnotusedasanindicatorat measurelevelforfour programmesalthough,insomeinstances,theinformation wasavailableatindividual projectlevel(seetextbox 6).In addition, otherissues such asjob duration(i.e. short term or longterm)andjoblevel(interms of qualityand pay) were not considered.
(a) stanjezaposlitvev obdobjušest do12 mesecev po usposabljanju se pri štirih programih ni uporabljalo kot kazalnik na ravni ukrepa, čeprav so bileinformacije v nekaterih primerih na voljo naravni posameznega projekta(glej okvir 6). Poleg tega se niso upoštevala druga vprašanja, kot sta trajanje zapo-slitve(tj. kratkoročna ali dolgoročna)in njena raven(v smislu kakovostiin plače).
(b)Oneoftheprogrammesdidnothaveasufficientrangeof indicatorstoallowa worthwhileanalysisto be madeandin anothercasetheindicatorsestablished werenotofatype suitableforthe measurementoftheachievementsofthe training actionsimplemented(seetextbox 7).
(b)pri enem od programov razpon kazalnikov ni bil dovolj velik, da bi omogočal izvedbo koristne analize, v drugem primeru pa vrsta vzpostavljenihkazalnikov ni bila primernaza merjenje dosežkovizvedenih dejavnosti usposabljanja(glej okvir 7).
In Lombardy, the authorities examined a sample of projects with regard to the employment status of trainees 12 months after the completion of the training actions and this was considered by the Courtasbeinganexampleof’goodpractice’.
V Lombardiji so organi za vzorec projektov preučili zaposlitveni status udeležencev usposabljanja 12 mesecev po koncu dejavnosti usposabljanja. Sodišče je to štelo za primer „dobre prakse“.
In Andalusia, an indicator had been established concerning the success or otherwise of trainees in their subsequent search for employment.
V Andaluziji je bil vzpostavljen kazalnik o uspehu ali neuspehu udeležencev pri iskanju zaposlitve po opravljenem usposabljanju.
However, some weaknesses were observed with regard to data collection. For example, for one of the actions receiving 35 % of total expenditure for the measure, the relevant information was only available for 42 % of the training courses sampled.
Vendar so bile ugotovljene nekatere slabosti pri zbiranju podatkov, npr. pri eni od dejavnosti, ki je prejela 35 % skupnih odhodkov za ukrep, so bile relevantne informacije na voljo le za 42 % tečajev usposabljanja v vzorcu.
In Andalusia, the indicator ’number of jobs obtained within six months after the actions’ did not adequately address the specificities of the measures co-financed.
V Andaluziji kazalnik „število zaposlitev, pridobljenih v šestih mesecih po dejavnostih“ ni ustrezno obravnaval posebnosti sofinanciranih ukrepov.
As 40 % of the expenditure went on orientation and pre-training actions, more pertinent indicators might have dealt with numbers going on to further training or registering as job seekers.
Ker je bilo 40 % odhodkov porabljenih za dejavnosti usmerjanjain predhodnega usposabljanja, bi ustreznejši kazalniki morda obravnavali število tistih, ki so se udeležili nadaljnjega usposabljanja ali se prijavili kot iskalci zaposlitve.
Furthermore, 20 % of the trainees were already in employment and therefore their responses skewed the apparent results of this indicator.
Poleg tega je bilo 20 % udeležencev usposabljanja že zaposlenih, zato so njihovi odgovori popačili rezultate tega kazalnika.
Someindicatorsfor the Scottish programme wereframedin too broad afashion to be of much value for measuring the result of the training actions, e.g. ’number of women/people gaining a part/full qualification’.
Nekateri kazalniki za škotski program so bili oblikovani preohlapno, zato niso bili preveč koristni pri merjenju rezultata dejavnosti usposabljanja, npr. „število žensk/oseb, ki so pridobile delne/polne kvalifikacije“.
In terms of the indicator, the passing of one learning unit towards a full qualification was equivalent to obtaining thefull qualification, even though thelearning effect could not in any way be judged as comparable.
Pri kazalnikuje ena uspešno končana enota pouka pri pridobivanju polne kvalifikacije štela kot enakovredna pridobitvi polne kvalifikacije, čeprav učinka pouka na noben način ni mogoče šteti za primerljivega.
TARGETS NOT SET FOR ALL MEASURES
CILJI NISO BILI DOLOČENI ZA VSE UKREPE
Targets to be achieved were not setfor all measures audited17:in two casesthere was no quantification at all andin another case, although a number of output and results’ indicators had been identified, the only quantified target was for ’number of participants’.
Cilji, ki jih je treba doseči, niso bili določeni za vse revidirane ukre-pe: v dveh primerih količinske opredelitve sploh ni bilo, v nekem drugem primeru paje bilkljubštevilnim določenimkazalnikom izložkovinrezultatov količinsko opredeljen samo en cilj, „število udeležencev“.
Forthetwo measures wheretargets had beenset,there was no explanation as to how they had been established andin one case the targets had to be revised significantly following the mid-term review(seetextbox 8).
Pridvehukrepih, prikaterihso bilicilji določeni,ninobenega pojasnilaotem,kakosejihjedoločalo,venemprimerupaje bilo cilje po vmesnem vrednotenjutreba močno spremeniti(glej okvir 8).
MONITORING DATA UNRELIABLE AND SOMETIMESINCOMPLETE
PODATKI O SPREMLJANJU SO NEZANESLJIVIIN VČASIH NECELOVITI
Fortwo ofthefive programmes, outputindicators concerningthe number of participants were found to be unreliable.
Pri dveh od petih programovje bilo za kazalnike izložkov, ki zadevajo število udeležencev, ugotovljeno, da so nezanesljivi.
For four of the programmes, results’ indicators such as numbers completing training and gaining qualifications were alsofoundto be unreliable.
Pri štirih programihso biliza nezanesljive ugotovljenitudikazalniki rezultatov,kotstaštevilo udeležencev,kikončajo usposabljanje, in pridobitev kvalifikacij.
For the Scottish programme, quantified targets had been set up as per the table below.
Količinski cilji za škotski program so bili določeni, kot je prikazano v tabeli spodaj.
Despite enquiries by the Court, no information was provided as to how benchmarks had been established or initial and revised targets arrived at.
Sodišče kljub poizvedbam ni prejelo nobenihinformacij otem, kako so bila določena merila za primerjanje uspešnosti ali prvotni in spremenjeni cilji.
Thefollowingshortcomings were notedinrespect ofthe underlying data:
Pri osnovnih podatkihso bile ugotovljene naslednje pomanjkljivosti:
(a) incompleteness,especially withregardtothequestionof what people who had been trained were doing 6 to 12 months aftertheirtraining(see paragraph 36 also);
(a) necelovitost, zlasti pri vprašanju, kaj so ljudje, ki so se usposabljali, počeli 6 do 12 mesecev pozneje (glej tudi odstavek 36);