natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A number of evaluation exercises conducted at nationallevel during this reporting period are worthy of comment.Of particular interest are evaluations carried out bycountries that adopted a more ‘structured’ approach totheir national drug strategy, the elements of which can besummarised as the formal documenting of objectives,defining and quantifying targets, identifying the authorityresponsible for implementation and specifying the date forthe achievement of objectives.
Primere takega pristopa lahko najdemo v strategijah Češke, Irske, Luksemburga, Poljske in Portugalske, prikaterih je vrednotenje nacionalnih strategij boja protidrogam razkrilo ali bi lahko razkrilo dosežene ukrepe inneizpolnjene naloge, glede katerih je še treba ukrepati.Primer, kako lahko strukturiran pristop pomaga privrednotenju napredka, je mogoče najti v vrednotenjuportugalske nacionalne strategije boja proti drogam zaleto 2004.
This approach makes iteasier for countries to report on the tasks that have beenaccomplished and to identify problematic issues, thereforeenabling action to be taken where needed.
Zunanji ocenjevalci so ugotovili, da je bildosežen napredek pri doseganju nekaterih od 30 glavnihciljev portugalskega akcijskega načrta, pri čemer je bilovceloti doseženih osem ciljev in 10 delno; vendar jepomanjkanje informacij pomenilo, da je bilo druge ciljetežko ovrednotiti, za pet ciljev pa je bilo ocenjeno, da nisobili doseženi.
The lack of availability of information on direct publicexpenditure on the drug issue continues to be a problem.However, there are signs that, alongside growing academic interest in this area(7), there is growing political commitment to the identification and description of drugrelated public expenditure so that national expenditure ondrugs can be included as a key element in cost–benefitevaluations. Together with the Reitox network and the European Commission, the EMCDDA is now developing
V Nemčiji je bil ustanovljen usmerjevalniodbor (Nacionalni svet za odvisnost od drog), ki je akcijskinačrt 2003 usmerjal k izvajanju in spremljal rezultat.
Examples of such an approach can be found in thestrategies of the Czech Republic, Ireland, Luxembourg,Poland and Portugal, where evaluation of the nationaldrug strategies revealed, or has the potential to reveal,actions that have been achieved and unaccomplishedtasks that still have to be acted on.
Prvi proces vrednotenja na nacionalni in evropski ravni jedragocen mehanizem povratnih informacij, saj nosilceodločitev obvešča o obsegu uresničevanja njihovihodločitev in s tem povezanih stroških ter jim omogočapovečati prizadevanja na področjih, na katerih so bilezabeležene težave ali kjer je ocena privedla do neugodnihugotovitev.
An example of how astructured approach can help an evaluation of progress
Čeprav še ni na voljo jasnega dokaza o vplivunacionalnih strategij boja proti drogam na splošen pojavdrog (EMCDDA, 2004a), je pristop „štetja rezultatov“
See the selected issue, ‘Public expenditure in the area of drug-demand reduction’ in the EMCDDA annual report 2003
Glej izbrano vprašanje „Javni izdatki na področju zmanjševanja povpraševanja po drogah“ v Letnem poročilu Centra 2003
In Belgium, Spain, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom — for detailed references, see the EMCDDA website
V Belgiji, Španiji, Franciji, Luksemburgu, na Nizozemskem, Finskem, Švedskem in v Združenem kraljestvu – za podrobne reference glej spletno stran
Chapter 1: New developments in policies and laws methodology that will allow consistent and credibleestimates of drugrelated public expenditure within the EU,as requested by the EU action plan of 2005.
Poglavje 1: Nov razvoj politik in zakonov pozitiven znak in bo, upajmo, v Evropi sprožil splošen trendk podrobnejši oceni vsake nacionalne strategije boja protidrogam.
In Poland,cannabis was the most reported substance in the media,accounting for 865 of a total of about 2 500 referencestodrugs.
Na Poljskem so mediji najboljporočali o konoplji, saj se je o njej pisalo v 865 od okoli2500 obravnavanj droge.
Bills advocating its legalisation were presented in Belgium, Denmark and in some city councils in the Netherlands, with the aim of solving the ‘back doorproblem’(8), provoking strong and public opposition frommost members of parliament and government ministers.
V Belgiji, na Danskem invnekaterih mestnih svetih na Nizozemskem so bilipredloženi osnutki zakonov o odobritvi legalizacijekonoplje (s ciljem reševanja „problema zadnjih vrat“ (8)),kar je izzvalo močno in javno nasprotovanje večine članovparlamenta in vladnih ministrov.
This first evaluation process at national and European levelrepresents a valuable feedback mechanism, informingdecision-makers of the extent to which their decisions havebeen implemented, and at what cost, and enabling them toincrease efforts in those areas where problems have beenrecorded or assessment has produced unfavourablefindings.
Prvi proces vrednotenja na nacionalni in evropski ravni jedragocen mehanizem povratnih informacij, saj nosilceodločitev obvešča o obsegu uresničevanja njihovihodločitev in s tem povezanih stroških ter jim omogočapovečati prizadevanja na področjih, na katerih so bilezabeležene težave ali kjer je ocena privedla do neugodnihugotovitev.
Although clear evidence of the impact of nationaldrug strategies on the overall drug phenomenon is not yetavailable (EMCDDA, 2004a), the approach of ‘countingthe score’ is a positive sign and, hopefully, will trigger ageneral trend in Europe towards the detailed assessmentofeach national drug strategy.
Čeprav še ni na voljo jasnega dokaza o vplivunacionalnih strategij boja proti drogam na splošen pojavdrog (EMCDDA, 2004a), je pristop „štetja rezultatov“pozitiven znak in bo, upajmo, v Evropi sprožil splošen trendk podrobnejši oceni vsake nacionalne strategije boja protidrogam.
The prospect of changes in the drug laws has attractedmedia attention and generated political debate in Franceand Italy.
Možnost sprememb zakonodaje na področju drog je v Franciji in Italiji pritegnila pozornost medijev in sprožilapolitično razpravo.
In France, a proposal to replace prisonsentences for drug use with fines was abandoned becauseof concerns that such a change would be ‘interpreted as asign that drugs are not very dangerous’ and lead to ‘a new increase in use and use at an earlier age’(9). In Italy the
V Franciji je bil predlog nadomestitvezapornih kazni zaradi uživanja drog z denarnimi kaznimiukinjen zaradi zaskrbljenosti, da se bo takšna sprememba„razlagala kot znak, da droge niso zelo nevarne,“ invodila k „vnovičnemu povečanju uživanja in zgodnejšemuuživanju“ (9).
Debates in national parliamentsandmedia media echoed the vigorous parliamentary debate onchanges to the 1990 law and a differentiation in sanctionsfor possession of drugs attracted media and politicalattention in the Czech Republic.
V Italiji je v medijih odmevala živahnaparlamentarna razprava o spremembah zakonodaje iz leta1990, na Češkem pa je medijsko in javno pozornostpritegnilo razlikovanje med sankcijami za posedovanjedrog.
Ad hoc research to analyse media messages has beenundertaken in the Czech Republic, Greece, Luxembourg,Poland and Portugal, and national media campaignstargeted at young people in particular have been
Na Češkem, v Grčiji, Luksemburgu, na Poljskem in Portugalskem je bila izvedena priložnostna raziskava za analizo medijskih sporočil, v Belgiji (10), na Poljskem in v Združenem kraljestvu (11) pa so se oblikovale nacionalne
Societal concerns about the drug phenomenon arereflected both in the media and in parliamentary debates.During the reporting period, among the data onparliamentary debates provided in the Reitox nationalreports, the most reported subjects were ‘harm reduction’or interventions that fall under this category, ‘cannabisuse’and ‘drug-related crime and related modificationsofdruglaws’.
Družbena zaskrbljenost glede pojava drog se odražavmedijih in parlamentarnih razpravah. V poročevalnemobdobju so poleg podatkov o parlamentarnih razpravah,navedenih v nacionalnih poročilih Reitox, najbolj poročalio „zmanjševanju škode“ ali intervencijah, ki sodijo v tokategorijo, „uživanju konoplje“ ter „z drogo povezanemkriminalu in spremljajočih spremembah zakonodaje napodročju drog“.
developed in Belgium(10
medijske kampanje, namenjene mladim.
New developments in EU programmes and legislation
Nov razvoj v programih in zakonodaji EU
Important EU initiatives relating to drugs that wereidentified during the reporting period took place in thefields of public health, drug trafficking and the controlofprecursors and synthetic drugs.
Pomembne pobude EU v zvezi z drogami, ki so bileugotovljene med poročevalnim obdobjem, so potekale napodročjih javnega zdravja, prometa z drogami in nadzoranad predhodnimi sestavinami in sintetičnimi drogami.
The advantages and disadvantages of substitutiontherapies and harm reduction measures compared withdrug-free approaches stimulated animated parliamentarydebates in the Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Irelandand Norway. Subjects of heated political debate includedthe proposal to make the syringe exchange programmepermanent in Sweden, even though it would be understrictly controlled conditions, and the temporaryestablishment of injecting rooms in Norway (see theselected issue on national laws and public nuisance).
Prednosti in slabosti nadomestnih terapij in ukrepov zazmanjševanje škode v primerjavi s pristopi zdravljenja brezdrog so spodbudile živahne parlamentarne razprave na Češkem, v Estoniji, Franciji, na Irskem in Norveškem.Predmeti vročih političnih razprav so vključevali predlogostalnem programu zamenjave injekcijskih igel in brizg zaenkratno uporabo na Švedskem, čeprav pod strogimnadzorom, in začasno vzpostavitev prostorov za uživanjedrog na Norveškem (glej izbrano vprašanje o nacionalnihzakonodajah in motenju javnega reda).
At the European level, drug prevention is included in thehealth determinants strand of the public health programme(12).
O uživanju konoplje oziroma na splošnoo uživanju drog v šolah in pri mladih so obsežno poročalimediji v Belgiji, na Češkem, v Nemčiji, na Cipru, v Luksemburgu in Avstriji.
The 2004 work plan of this programme
Na Nizozemskem so pozornostmedijev pritegnili povečanje vsebnosti
Cannabis remained an important topic of debate,particularly in Germany, where the main focus was oncannabis use by young people, and in Luxembourg and Portugal, where it has been proposed that it should bemade available on medical prescription.
Na evropski ravni je preprečevanje zlorabe drog zajetovpodročje determinant zdravja programa javnegazdravja(12).
In the Netherlands, media focused on the Council recommendation of 18 June 2003and the development, with the involvement of the EMCDDA, of an appropriate base for an inventory ofactivities in the EU.
Delovni načrt tega programa 2004 se jeosredotočil na priporočilo Sveta z dne 18. junija 2003 inna razvoj, v sodelovanju s Centrom, ustrezne podlage zapopis dejavnosti v EU.
The Commission encouragedstakeholders to submit proposals involving a lifestyle
Komisija je spodbudila interesneskupine k predložitvi predlogov, ki vključujejo pristopživljenjskega sloga do obravnave zlorabe vseh snovi, kipovzročajo odvisnost, zlasti v rekreativnih okoljih za
Coffee shops can hold stock of up to 500g of cannabis for sale but they can only acquire it through illegal markets. This is the so-called ‘back door problem’.
Lokali, imenovani coffee shopi, imajo lahko na zalogi do 500 g konoplje za prodajo, vendar jo lahko kupijo samo na nezakonitem trgu.
Annual report 2005: the state of the drugs problem in Europe implementation plans on demand and supply reduction ofdrugs and the supply of synthetic drugs.
Letno poročilo 2005: stanje v zvezi s problemom drog v Evropi
The establishment and operation of a sustainable healthmonitoring system is among the key objectives of the publichealth programme (2003–08).
Vzpostavitev trajnostnega sistema spremljanja zdravja proizvodnjo prepovedanih drog, ali psihotropnih snovizaradi preprečevanja preusmerjanja teh snovi.
The Commission haspursued consultations with Member States and internationalbodies with a view to consolidating a set of European Community health indicators.
Zlastidržavam članicam zagotavlja smernice za sprejetjepotrebnih ukrepov, ki njihovim pristojnim organomomogočajo izvajanje nadzora in obveznost spremljanja,ter informacije, kako prepoznati sumljivo sklepanje poslovin kako obveščati o njih.
In this context, ‘drug-relateddeaths’ and ‘consumption of psychotropic drugs’ wereincluded in the draft core indicators list, thereby reinforcingstructural links with the EMCDDA as a potential dataproducer.
Svet je 22. decembra sprejel Uredbo 111/2005/ES, ki določa pravila za spremljanjetrgovine s predhodnimi sestavinami za prepovedane drogemed Skupnostjo in tretjimi državami.
On 11 February 2004, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 on drugprecursors(14).
Vzpostavitev in delovanje trajnostnega sistema zaspremljanje zdravja je med ključnimi cilji programa javnegazdravja (2003–2008).
In particular,itprovides guidelines for Member States to adopt themeasures necessary to enable their competent authoritiesto perform their control and monitoring duties andinformation on how to recognise and notify suspecttransactions.
Komisija se je posvetovalazdržavami članicami in mednarodnimi organi, da bizdružila sklop kazalcev zdravja Evropske skupnosti.
On 22 December 2004, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 111/2005, laying down rules formonitoring the trade in drug precursors between the Community and third countries.
V temokviru so bili „z drogo povezani smrtni primeri“ in „uživanjepsihotropnih drog“ vključeni v osnutek osrednjega seznamakazalcev, s čimer so se okrepile strukturne povezave s Centrom kot morebitnim dajalcem podatkov.
approach to addressing the abuse of all substances withaddictive potential, especially in recreational places(e.g.nightclubs) and prisons. It was particularly interestedin the development of best practice and improvementsincommunications and the dissemination of informationinvolving modern techniques.
Evropska komisija je novembra 2004 pri Horizontalnidelovni skupini za droge (Horizontal Working Party on Drugs, HDG) pri Svetu kot nadaljevanje resolucije Sveta iznovembra 2002 predstavila študijo o pristopu seznamasplošnih in nujnih ukrepov pri nadzoru sintetičnih drog.
The Commission selectedfour projects in 2004, which aimed to prevent risk-takingbehaviour, to harmonise international knowledge on thebiomedical side-effects of doping, to reinforce the transferof knowledge on responses to drug consumption and toextend to the new Member States an existing web resourceof information on licit and illicit drugs.
Pravtako je Komisija aprila 2004 HDG posredovala predlogeza možne dodatne izboljšave metod za določanjedistribucijskih mrež sintetičnih drog v EU.
Following on from a Council resolution from November2002, the European Commission presented a study on ageneric and emergency list approach to the control ofsynthetic drugs at the Council’s horizontal working partyon drugs (HDG) in November 2004.
Nove nacionalne zakonodaje zabavo (npr. nočnih klubih) in zaporih. Zlasti jo je zanimalrazvoj najboljše prakse in izboljšav v sporočanju terrazširjanje informacij z uporabo modernih tehnik.
It also presentedsuggestions for possible further improvements in themethods of mapping distribution networks of syntheticdrugs in the EU to the HDG in April 2004.
Komisijaje leta 2004 izbrala štiri projekte, katerih cilj je bilpreprečiti tvegano vedenje, uskladiti mednarodno znanjeobiomedicinskih stranskih učinkih nedovoljenih poživil,krepiti prenos znanja o odzivih na uporabo drog terrazširiti obstoječi spletni vir informacij o dovoljenih inprepovedanih drogah na nove države članice.
In 2004, a number of instruments were adopted at EUlevel to counter drug trafficking.
Leta 2004 so bili na ravni EU sprejeti številni instrumenti zaboj proti prometu s prepovedanimi drogami.
The Council frameworkdecision 2004/757/JHA of 25 October 2004 laid downminimum provisions on the constituent elements of criminal acts and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking(13
Okvirni sklep Sveta 2004/757/JHA z dne 25. oktobra 2004 jeopredelil minimalne določbe glede elementov kaznivihdejanj in kazni na področju nedovoljenega prometasprepovedanimi drogami (13) ter je z uvedbo minimalnihkazni za takšna kazniva dejanja v državah članicah ključniinstrument za boj proti prometu s prepovedanimi drogami.
Protection may be delivered by direct or more generalapproaches.
Zaščita se lahko zagotovi z neposrednimi ali bolj splošnimipristopi.
In Hungary, the March 2003 law aims toprotect persons under the age of 18 against misuse ofnarcotic drugs, and punishments for adults will be moresevere for offences involving minors. In Estonia,amendments at the beginning of 2004 provide stricterpenalties with respect to most drugrelated crimes,including inducing minors to consume drugs illegally.
Na Madžarskem skuša zakonodaja iz marca2003 zaščititi osebe, mlajše od 18 let, pred zloraboprepovedanih drog, kazni za odrasle pa bodo strožje, čebodo kazniva dejanja vključevala mladoletne osebe.VEstoniji spremembe v začetku leta 2004 določajo strožjekazni za večino z drogami povezanih kaznivih dejanj,vključno z napeljevanjem mladoletnih oseb k nezakonitemuuživanju drog.
Agreement on a Council decision on informationexchange, risk assessment and control of newpsychoactive substances was reached by the Council in December 2004.
Svet je decembra 2004 dosegel sporazum o sklepu Svetao izmenjavi informacij, oceni tveganja in nadzoru novihpsihoaktivnih snovi.
This decision provides a framework foreffective information exchange on new psychotropicsubstances as well as a mechanism for bringing themunder control at EU level.
Ta sklep zagotavlja okvir za učinkovitoizmenjavo informacij o novih psihotropnih snoveh inmehanizem za nadzor teh snovi na ravni EU.
The Council adopted on 30 March 2004 arecommendation regarding guidelines for taking samplesof seized drugs.
Svet je 30. marca 2004 sprejel priporočilo o smernicah zavzorčenje zaseženih drog.
It recommends that, where this is notalready done, Member States introduce a system of takingsamples in accordance with internationally acceptedguidelines.
V njem priporoča, da morajodržave, ki tega še niso storile, uvesti sistem vzorčenjavskladu z mednarodno sprejetimi smernicami.
The Council also adopted a resolution oncannabis and a progress report in relation to the
Svet jesprejel tudi resolucijo o konoplji in poročilo o napredkuvzvezi zizvedbenimi načrti o zmanjšanju povpraševanja inponudbe droge ter ponudbe sintetičnih drog.
In Denmark the Euphoriants Act was amended in July2004; the distribution of drugs in restaurants, discothequesor similar places frequented by children or young people isnow deemed to be a significantly aggravatingcircumstance.
Na Danskem je bil julija 2004 spremenjen Zakonosnoveh, ki povzročajo evforijo; distribucija drogvrestavracijah, diskotekah ali podobnih prostorih, ki jihpogosto obiskujejo otroci ali mladi, se sedaj obravnava kotbistvena oteževalna okoliščina.
Such offences should always be punishedwith a prison sentence, and it is intended that the averageprison sentence for such offences will be increased by one
Takšna kazniva dejanja bibilo vedno treba kaznovati z zaporno kaznijo inpredvideno je, da se povprečne zaporne kazni za takšnakazniva dejanja zvišajo za eno tretjino.
8; see also EMCDDA annual report 2004 (http://ar2004.emcdda.eu.int).)OJ L 47, 18.2.2004, p. 1.
8; glej tudi Letno poročilo Centra 2004 (http://ar2004.emcdda.eu.int).)UL L 47, 18.2.2004, str. 1.
Chapter 1: New developments in policies and laws action plan over the fiveyear period. For an in-depthanalysis of measures targeting young drug-using offenders,see the selected issue on alternatives to imprisonment.
Poglavje 1: Nov razvoj politik in zakonov mladinskih klubov in igrišč posedovali konopljo, izdanasmernica o novi zakonodaji.
In France, a law passed in August 2004 adopting the fiveyear public health policy plan incorporates the policy onharm reduction for drug users into the public healthregulations, giving harm reduction an official definitionand bringing it within the jurisdiction of the state.
V Franciji zakon, sprejet avgusta 2004, o petletnem načrtupolitike javnega zdravja združuje politiko zmanjševanjaškode za uživalce drog s predpisi o javnem zdravju, pričemer uradno opredeli pojem zmanjševanja škode in jovključi v pristojnost države.
Measures in response to young people taking drugsincluded two cabinet regulations adopted in Latvia in December 2003.
Ukrepi proti mladim, ki uživajo drogo, so zajemali dvevladni uredbi, sprejeti decembra 2003 v Latviji.
One outlined procedures for theobligatory institutional treatment (with parental consent)ofchildren caught misusing drugs and the other specifiedactions to be taken when drugs or other intoxicants arefound in a school.
Ena jedoločala postopke za obvezno institucionalno zdravljenjeotrok (s soglasjem staršev), ki so jih ujeli pri zlorabi drog,druga pa je določila ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti priodkritju drog in drugih sredstev za omamljanje v šolah.VAngliji in Walesu ljudje, mlajši od 18 let, ki so biliaretirani zaradi kaznivih dejanj v zvezi s konopljo,prejmejo opomin ali končno opozorilo ali pa jih ovadipolicija, odvisno od resnosti kaznivega dejanja.
In England and Wales people under18years old arrested for cannabis offences continue toreceive a reprimand or final warning or are charged bythe police, depending on the seriousness of the offence.After a final warning, the young offender will be referredto a youth offending team (YOT), which will makearrangements for treatment or other support.
Pozadnjem opozorilu se mladoletnega prestopnika napotivskupino za mladoletne prestopnike (youth offendingteam, YOT), ki zagotovi zdravljenje ali drugo podporo.
In Finland, a government decree amended the Communicable Disease Act to state that communicabledisease specialists in health centres should undertakeprevention work, including the provision of healthcounselling for intravenous drug users and theimplementation of needle and syringe exchanges asnecessary. In Luxembourg, the Grand-Ducal decree of December 2003 regulates the national syringe distributionprogramme by defining facilities and professionalsauthorised to provide syringes to drug users.
Na Finskem je vladni odlok spremenil Zakon o nalezljivihboleznih s tem, ko je določil, da morajo specialisti zanalezljive bolezni v zdravstvenih centrih opravljatipreventivno delo, vključno z zdravstvenim svetovanjem zaintravenozne uživalce drog in izvajanjem zamenjaveinjekcijskih igel in brizg, kolikor je to potrebno.VLuksemburgu vojvodski odlok iz decembra 2003 urejanacionalni program za distribucijo brizg, tako daopredeljuje ustanove in strokovnjake, pristojne zazagotavljanje brizg uživalcem drog.
This continuesa trend towards permitting possession and supply of sterilesyringes via explicit legislation(17) supported by theoutgoing EU action plan 2000–04, which requested thedevelopment of provision of prophylactics.
Tako se nadaljujetrend glede dovoljevanja posedovanja in ponudbe sterilnihbrizg prek izrecne zakonodaje (17), ki jo podpira prejšnji Akcijski načrt EU 2000–2004, ki je zahteval zagotavljanjeprofilaktikov.
‘Legal framework of needle and syringe programmes’(18
Dodatne pravne informacije so na voljovtematskem pregledu ELDD „Pravni okvir programov zazamenjavo injekcijskih igel in brizg za enkratnouporabo“(18).
In the Czech Republic, the Act on Juvenile Justice, whichtook effect in 2004, modifies the conditions governingyoung people involved in penal code offences, which takeprecedence over general laws.
Na Češkem Zakon o mladoletniškem sodstvu, ki je začelveljati leta 2004, spreminja pogoje za mlade,obravnavane po kazenskem zakoniku, ki ima prednostpred splošnimi zakoni.
Penal measures should beimposed only when necessary, and educational measuresmay include prohibition of substance use or an obligationto undergo treatment.
Kazenski ukrepi se morajo uvestisamo po potrebi, izobraževalni ukrepi pa lahko zajemajoprepoved uživanja snovi ali obvezno zdravljenje.