natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 114).
Direktiva 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev(UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str. 114).
Commission Staff Working Document accompanying
Delovni dokument služb Komisije, ki spremlja predlog
26 March 2009 (TA/2009/188) on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy and Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) as regards food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (COM(2008)0563 — C6-0353/2008 — 2008/0183(CNS)).
26. marca 2009 (TA/2009/188) o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike in Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (uredba o enotni SUT) v zvezi z razdeljevanjem hrane najbolj ogroženim osebam v Skupnosti (COM(2008) 0563 – C6-0353/2008 – 2008/0183(CNS)).
Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation the Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy and (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) as regards food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community — Impact Assessment SEC(2008) 2436/2.
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike in Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (uredba o enotni SUT) v zvezi z razdeljevanjem hrane najbolj ogroženim osebam v Skupnosti – Ocena učinka SEC(2008) 2436/2.
(EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy and Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) as regards food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (COM(2008) 563 final).
št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike in Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (uredba o enotni SUT) v zvezi z razdeljevanjem hrane najbolj ogroženim osebam v Skupnosti (COM(2008) 563 konč.).
Inaddition,theprogrammehasaleverage effect on the development of actions by pri-vatebodies(charities)andpublicauthori-ties(atnationalandlocallevel),asshown in the Impact Assessment accompanying the 2008Commissionproposaltoreformthe programme.
Poleg tega program spodbuja zasebne orga-nizacije(dobrodelneustanove)injavne organe(nanacionalniinlokalniravni)pri pripraviukrepov,kotjerazvidnoizocene učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za reformo programaizleta 2008.
5.Total numbers of people‘atrisk of poverty’ donotconstitutethetargetgroupofthis measure.
Komisija meni,dajezanesljivejšikazalnik znesekveurih na prejemnika pomoči,izra-čunannapodlagipodatkoviznacionalnih poročil oizvajanju.
According to Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 3149/92, the category of popu-lation‘atriskofpoverty’isthestatistical indicator used in the calculation of the Member States’ allocations since it is considered the best available estimate of the number of most deprived persons.
5.Ciljnaskupinategaukrepanisovsiljudje „naroburevščine“.Vskladusčlenom2(1) Uredbe3149/92jekategorijaprebivalstva „naroburevščine“statističnikazalnik,na podlagikateregaseizračunajoprispevki posameznihdržavčlanic,sajveljazanaj-boljšorazpoložljivoocenoštevilanajbolj ogroženih oseb.
The notion of population ‘at risk of poverty’ is based on criteria agreedin December 2001 at the European Council meetingin Laeken.
Pojem prebivalstva „na robu revščine“temelji na merilih, okaterihseje dogovoril Evropski svet na zasedanju decembra 2001 v Laeknu.
The Commission considers that a more rele-vantindicatoristheamountineurosper real aid recipient, calculated on the basis of information contained in national reports on implementation.
9.Komisijameni,dajevednovečještevilo držav članic, ki sodelujejo v programu, dokaz za njegovo dodano vrednost.
For the 2009 annual plan, the Commission hasalreadyusedanew methodcombining relative (GNI — Gross National Income — per capita expressed in Purchase Power Standards) and absolute (population at risk of poverty)indicators.
Pri letnem načrtu za leto 2009 je Komisija že uporabilanovo metodo,kijekombinacija relativnih(BND–brutonacionalnidoho-dek–naprebivalca,izražensstandardom kupne moči)inabsolutnih(populacijana roburevščine) kazalnikov.
11.Providinganoutletforinterventionstocks is a major objective ofthescheme.
11.Zagotavljanjeporabeintervencijskihzalog je pomemben cilj programa.
Thepopulationactuallytargetedbythis scheme is defined by Member States’ administrations in close cooperation with charities, and corresponds to individuals and families in need offood assistance.
Populacijo,kijijetaprogramdejansko namenjen,opredelijoupravedržavčlanic v tesnem sodelovanju z dobrodelnimi orga-nizacijami,grepazaposameznikeindru-žine, ki potrebujejo pomoč v hrani.
Nowadays, mostoftheinterventionprod-uctsareexchangedagainstfoodandless andlessprocessedfordistributiontothe mostdeprived.Callfortenderprocedures arenotinfluencedbythefactthatinter-ventionproductsareeitherprocessedor exchanged,butthisfactoraffectsthebur-den of control.
Danesse največintervencijskih proizvodov zamenja za živila, vedno manj pa sejih predela za razdeljevanje najbolj ogroženim. Dejstvo, da se intervencijski proizvodi predelajo ali zamenjajo, ne vpliva na postopkejavnih razpisov, vpliva pa na breme nadzora.
7.Oneoftheaimsoftheprogrammeisto secureareliableandstablesourceoffood forthe charities engagedin providingfood assistancetothe most deprived persons of the Community. In this respect, Box 5 of the Court’s report provides clear evidence of the programme’s significant impact since it provides between 30 and 70 % of the total food distributed in the EU to the mostdeprived people.
Trendprednostnegaobravnavanja močno predelanih živil je posledica zahtev NVO, da sejimzagotovijoživila,kiboljeustrezajo življenjskim pogojem ogroženihljudi,in da lahkorazdelijoboljraznolikeproizvode,ki zagotavljajo bolj uravnoteženo prehrano.
Thetrendtowardsextensivelyprocessed foods is the result of NGO demands to be supplied with foodstuffs better suited to the living conditions of deprived people andin order to distribute a wider range of products securing a more balanced diet.
7.Eden od ciljev programaje zagotoviti zane-sljivinstalenvirživilzadobrodelneorga-nizacije,kisodelujejoprizagotavljanju hrane najbolj ogroženim osebam v Skupno-sti.Vtempogledujeizokvira5poročila Sodiščajasnorazvidno,kako pomembenje program,sajzagotavlja od 30 do 70 %sku-pne količine živil, ki se razdelijo v EU najbolj ogroženim.
25.Whileitistruethatintervention mechan–isms have been reformed recently, interven-tionremainsinplacefora wholerangeof major agricultural products such as cereals, skimmed milk powder and butter.Interven-tion stocks may buildup again in future, in a situation of low producer prices, leading to a more important share of intervention goods insourcingthescheme.Infact,interven-tion stocks for certain products are currently increasing again.
12.Javnezalogesespreminjajovsakoleto zaraditržnihpogojev,zlasticen.Sistem intervencijeje v zadnjihletih doživel obse-žnoreformo,vendarseševednouporablja zaštevilneglavnekmetijskeproizvode,na primer žita, posneto mleko v prahu in maslo, zalogepaselahkoobnizkihproizvodnih cenah hitro ponovno povečajo.
12.The situation of public stocks changes every yearonthebasisof marketconditions,in particularpricelevels.
V tem smislu jezelo verjetno, daletni načrtzaleto 2010 veliko bolj temelji na intervencijskih zalogah kot v prejšnjih dvehletih.
Whileintervention has been extensively reformed over the last few years, it remains operational for a whole range of main agricultural productsinclud-ing cereals,skimmed milk powder and but-ter,andstockscanrapidlybuildupagain in a situation of low producer prices.
25.Čeprav so bili intervencijski mehanizmi pred kratkim prenovljeni, se intervencija še vedno uporabljazacelovrstoglavnihkmetijskih proizvodov,naprimeržita,posneto mleko vprahuinmaslo.Vprihodnostiselahko intervencijske zaloge ob nizkih proizvodnih cenahponovnopovečajo,karlahkovodi k večjemu deležu intervencijskega blaga pri dobavi proizvodov za program.
In this sense,itisverylikelythatthe 2010annual plan relies more extensively on intervention stocksthanthetwo previous years.
Dejansko se intervencijskezaloge nekaterih proizvodov trenutnospet povečujejo.
26.Thefoodaidtodeprivedpersons measure keeps astronglink withthe CAP aslong as it contributes tofulfil the objectives of this policyinparticularintheareaof market stabilisation.
26.Zukrepompomočivhranizaogrožene osebe se ohranja močna povezava s SKP, če prispevakizpolnjevanjuciljevtepolitike, zlasti na področjustabilizacijetrga.
The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation seeks to remove the confinement of distributed products to those eligible for intervention.
17.Zelo velik del živil, kijih razdelijo vse organizacije, spada v okvir programa EU, čeprav serazmereprirazličnihdobrodelnihorga-nizacijahzelorazlikujejo.Analizapomena programain njegovega prispevka k blaginji najbolj ogroženih je na voljo v oceni učinka, kispremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta.
An analysisoftheimportanceofthescheme andofitscontributiontowardsthewell-being of the most deprived can befoundin the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposalfor a new Council Regulation.
Komisija poskuša s predlogom nove uredbe Sveta zagotoviti, da se ne bodo razdeljevali samotisti proizvodi,kiizpolnjujejo pogoje zaintervencijo.
27.The Commission does not wishto pre-empt the outcome of the political discussions that are currently taking place following the submission of the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation.
27.Komisijaneželidomnevatioizidupolitič-nih razprav, ki so trenutno v teku, potem ko je Komisija predložila predlog nove uredbe Sveta.
The Commission would like to underline that an overwhelming majority of Member States consistentlyvoteinfavouroftheapproval ofthe annual plans.
Komisijapoudarja,davelikavečinadržav članicvztrajnoglasujezaodobritevletnih načrtov.
28.Sinceitsinception,theschemehashada two-fold complementary dimension: market stabilisation andsocial. The cost-efficiency ofthe schemeisto be assessed againstthe concurrentfulfilment of both objectives.
28.Programimaodsamegazačetkadvojno dopolnilnorazsežnost:stabilizacijotrgain socialnorazsežnost.Stroškovnaučinkovi-tost programa se ocenjuje glede na sočasno izpolnjevanje obeh ciljev.
34.The notions of‘potential beneficiaries’ and ‘targetpopulation’aredifferent: whilethe formerisastatisticalindicatorusedexclu-sivelyfor the calculation of Member States’ allocations, the population actually targeted isdefinedattheappropriategeographical level by Member States’ managing authori-tiesincooperationwithcharities(Arti-cle 1(3) of Regulation(EEC) No 3149/92).
34.Pojma„morebitniupravičenci“in„ciljna populacija“serazlikujeta;medtemkoje prvipojemstatističnikazalnik,kiseupo-rabljaizključnozaračunanjeprispevkov državčlanic,padejanskociljnopopula-cijo na ustrezni geografskiravni opredelijo organi upravljanja državčlanicvsodelova-nju z dobrodelnimi organizacijami (člen 1(3) Uredbešt. 3149/92).
The1998evaluationstudymentionedby the Court was elaborated by an independent consultant.
Ocenjevalno študijo iz leta 1998, ki jo omenja Sodišče,je pripravil neodvisen strokovnjak.
The Commission’s quality check of this report includes critical remarksrelated mainlytoits methodology, the robustness of the analysis and the credibility oftheresults.
Preverjanje kakovostitega poročila s strani Komisije vključuje kritične pripombe, pred-vsemvzvezizuporabljeno metodologijo, zanesljivostjoanalizeinverodostojnostjo rezultatov.
For the 2009 budget allocation of the plan, a new methodology has been used combining the number of people‘atrisk of poverty’to the GNI per purchasing power parity for each Member State.
Zaleto 2009so bila načrtu dodeljenasred-stva vskladuz novo metodologijo, kizdru-žuješteviloljudi„naroburevščine“in BNP po pariteti kupne moči za vsako državo članico.
This further proves that the number of people at risk of povertyis not a number of potential beneficiaries.
To prav tako dokazuje, da številoljudi na robu revščine ni enako številu morebitnih upravičencev.
The various quotes highlighted by the Court bringforwardthesocialcomponentofthe scheme, withoutneverthelesscallinginto questionits agricultural dimension.
Različni citati, na katere opozarja Sodišče, poudarjajo socialno komponento programa, pritempanepostavljajopodvprašajnje-gove kmetijskerazsežnosti.
35–36.The food aid measure does not claim to solve byitselfthequestionoffoodinsecurityin the EU.
35–36.Ne trdimo, da ukrep pomoči v hrani sam raz-rešujeproblemnegotovepreskrbeshrano v EU.
It is a contribution to the solution ofaproblemthatrequiresnotonlythe involvement of the Community but also the mobilisationof Member States’ authorities at variouslevels and ofthe civilsociety.
Prispeva k reševanju problema, ki zahteva sodelovanje Skupnosti, pa tudi sodelovanje organov držav članic na različnih ravneh civilne družbe.
29.Evenifthesocial dimension ofthisscheme is duly recognised, the Commission would like to underline that Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 is a key Regulation of the Common Agricultural Policy, based on Articles 36 and 37 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.
29.Čepravjesocialnarazsežnostprograma ustrezno priznana, želi Komisija poudariti, da je Uredba (ES) št. 1234/2007 ključni predpis na področju skupne kmetijske politike, ki temeljinačlenih36in37Pogodbeousta-novitvi Evropskeskupnosti.
Inthiscontext, one oftheaims ofthe pro-grammeistosecureareliableandstable sourceoffoodstuffsfortheorganisations providingfoodassistancetothemost deprived persons.
Vtemsmislujeedenodciljevprograma zagotovitizanesljivinstalenvirživilza organizacije,kizagotavljajohranonajbolj ogroženim osebam.
33.Itemergesfromtheregular meetingsthat the Commission holds with Member States’ authorities and charities as part ofits management of the scheme, that there is generally a high level of satisfaction on both sides with the way consultations are conducted at nationallevel.
33.Na podlagi rednih srečanj, ki jih ima Komisija pri upravljanju programa z organi držav čla-nicin dobrodelnimi ustanovami,je mogoče sklepati,dastaobestraninasplošnozelo zadovoljni s tem, kako se vodijo posvetovanja na nacionalniravni.
The Commission agrees howeverthatthere isroomforimprovementandhasincluded in the Impact Assessment accompanying the2008Commissionproposalforanew Council Regulation suggestionsto enhance thelinkbetweentheschemeandother actionsat MemberState level, through for examplethedrawing-upofnationalfood distributionprogrammes.These wouldbe implemented after the adoption of the new Council Regulation.
Komisija se vseeno strinja, da so še mogoče izboljšave, tako da je v oceno učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbe Sveta iz leta 2008, vključila predloge za izboljšanje povezave med programom in drugimi ukrepi naravnidržavčlanic,naprimerspripravo nacionalnih programov razdeljevanja hrane. Ti programi biseizvajali posprejetju nove uredbe Sveta.
Therefore,theestimatesofthenumberof mealsprovidedtotheaidrecipientsare notthebestindicatoroftheprogramme’s impact, evenifthe distribution ofapproxi-mately156 million mealsperyearistobe considered verysignificant.
Zato ocene števila obrokov, ki se zagotovijo prejemnikompomoči,nisonajboljšipoka-zatelj učinka programa,čepravje približno 156 milijonov obrokov, ki se razdelijo vsako leto, zelo veliko.
38–40.One ofthespecificfeatures ofthisscheme is the essential role played by NGOs and charitiesthroughtheirdistributionchains andknowledgeoftheproblemsaffecting the most deprived population of the Community.
38–40.Ena od posebnosti tega programa je, da imajo poglavitnovlogonevladneindobrodelne organizacijessvojimidistribucijskimiveri-gami in poznavanjem problemov, s katerimi se sooča najbolj ogrožena populacija v Skupnosti.
By virtue of the principle of subsidi-arity,itis upto Member States’ authorities todeterminetheappropriateprocedures andcriteriato designatetheorganisations taking part in the implementation of annual plans.
V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti so organi držav članic tisti, ki določijo ustrezne postopkein merilazaizbiroorganizacij,ki sodelujejo priizvajanjuletnih načrtov.
Inthesameline,theselectionoffoodaid recipientsfallsundertheresponsibilityof Member States by virtue ofthe principle of subsidiarity.
Prav tako je tudi izbira prejemnikov pomoči vhranivskladuznačelomsubsidiarnosti v pristojnosti držav članic.
This does represent a ‘significant contributiontowardsthe well-beingofits most deprived persons’.
Topomeni,daprogram„bistvenoprispeva k blaginji najbolj ogroženih oseb“.
The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulationincludes a morecomprehensive reportingsystemby Member States to the Commission, the details of which would have tobelaiddowninthecorrespondingnew implementingrules.
Predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta vključuje celovitejši sistem poročanja držav članic Komisiji,podrobnostionjempabi morale biti določenevustreznihnovihizvedbenih pravilih.
37.Nowadaysselectioncriteriaandtargeting are decided by Member States’ administrations in cooperation with charities, the latter having to respect such criteria to be able to participateinthescheme.
37.Merila zaizborin ciljne populacije določijo uprave državčlanicvsodelovanjuz dobro-delnimiorganizacijami,ki morajospošto-vatitamerila,dasplohlahkosodelujejo v programu.
The food needs of most deprived individualsvarygreatlyfromcasetocase and overtime.In orderto beeffective,the schemerequiresaconsiderabledegreeof flexibilitysothatitcanbeadjustedtoa broadrange of circumstances.
Da bi bil učinkovit, mora biti program precej prožen in prilagodljiv zelorazličnim okoliščinam.
The public consultation on the future of the programmethattookplaceaspartofthe Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposalfor a new Council Regulation, has revealed alarge consensus for not restrainingthechoice ofthe populationto behelpedtocertaincategoriesamongthe most deprived.
Vjavnemposvetovanjuoprihodnostipro-grama,kije potekalokot del ocene učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, se je izkazalo, da obstaja veliko soglasje, da se populacija, kije deležna pomoči, nesme omejevati na določene kategorije med najbolj ogroženimi.
The Commission’s opinion isthat,byvirtueofthesubsidiarityprin-ciple, such choice should beleft to Member States.
Komisija meni, da je treba zaradi načela subsidiarno-stitoizbiro prepustiti državam članicam.
Following the Court’s examples in Box 5, the EU scheme provides between 30 and 70 % of the total food distributed in the Community to the most deprived people, depending on the charities and the Member States.
Glede na primere, ki jih Sodišče navaja v okviru 5, program EUzagotavlja od 30 do 70 %(odvisnooddobrodelneorganizacije in države članice) vseh živil, ki se razdelijo najbolj ogroženim v Skupnosti. To ni zanemarljivo.
A comprehensive descrip-tionoftheseadjustmentscanbefoundin the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation.
V oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta,je obsežen opisteh prilagoditev.
52.Asforeseenin Article 2 of Regulation(EEC) No 3149/92 with regard to the allocation of resourcesto Member States, the Commission duly considersthereportstransmitted by Member States as part of the monitoring mechanismandinadditiontoregular contacts with Member States, in particular within the frame of the Management Committee.
52.Kot določa člen 2 Uredbešt. 3149/92 glede dodelitve sredstev državam članicam, Komisija ustrezno upošteva poročila, ki jih posre-dujejodržavečlanicevokviru mehanizma zaspremljanje,polegrednihstikovzdrža-vami članicami, zlasti v okviru upravljalnega odbora.
In the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation the range of food that may be distributed is no longer confined to the families of products eligibleforintervention.
V predlogu Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta živila, ki se lahko razdeljujejo, niso več ome-jenanavrsteproizvodov,kiizpolnjujejo pogoje zaintervencijo.
Moreover, the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation presents variousfindings based onthestudyofthenationalreports,such asfor examplethe number of beneficiaries of the aid.
Poleg tega je v oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta, predstavljenih več ugotovitev na podlagi študije nacional-nihporočil,naprimeršteviloprejemnikov pomoči.
This proves that the Commission analyses and makes use ofthesereports.
To dokazuje, da Komisija analizira in uporabljata poročila.
47.The objective ofthe measureis notto provide an identical level of aid to all aid recipients astheir needs are differenttoo and so are the costs offood across Member States.
47.Cilj ukrepa ni zagotoviti enako raven pomoči vsem prejemnikom,sajsorazličnetudi njihove potrebe, pravtako patudi cene hrane vdržavahčlanicah.
Theabsenceofuniformquantitiesdistrib-uted per person does not necessarily create ariskofpoorimpactnorofaidrecipients beingtreated unequally.
Dejstvo,dakoličina,ki se dodeli posamezni osebi, ni določena, ne predstavljanujnonevarnosti,daboučinek slab ali da prejemniki ne bodo obravnavani enakovredno.
53.In application of the subsidiarity principle, it falls on Member Statestofixthe definition of beneficiaries best suited to the particular situationofits mostdeprivedpopulation.
53.Vskladuznačelomsubsidiarnostijevpri-stojnostidržavčlanic,dadoločijo,kateri upravičenci najbolj ustrezajo položaju najbolj ogrožene populacije.
Therefore, the Commission is of the view that commonstandardsordefinitionofbenefi-ciaries would not bring about anyimprove-menttothe efficiency ofthe programme.
Zato Komisija meni,daskupnistandardialiopredelitev upravičencevnebiizboljšaliučinkovitosti programa.
49–50.The Commission will do its utmost within the limitsduetothenatureandthespecifici-ties ofthis measure,to securethatthe new implementingrulesaftertheadoptionof the new Council Regulation lay down objectives and indicators according to applicable guidelines.
49–50.Komisijasibovokviruomejitevzaradi naraveinposebnostitegaukrepaprizade-valazagotoviti,dabodonovaizvedbena pravila po sprejetju nove uredbe Sveta dolo-čalaciljeinkazalnikevskladuzveljavnimi smernicami.
In the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation the Commissionhasexpresseditsintentionto reinforce Member States’ reporting obligations. Details are to be laid down in the new implementing rules after the adoption of the new Council Regulation.
Voceniučinka,kispremljapredlogza novo uredbo Sveta,je Komisijaizrazila svoj namen,dapovečaobveznostidržavčlanic gledeporočanja.Podrobnostibododolo-čene v novihizvedbenih pravilih po sprejetju nove uredbe Sveta.
Withthispurpose,aseriesof measurable objectives and harmonised, measurable indicators have been proposed in the Impact Assessment accompanyingthe Commission proposalfor a new Council Regulation.
Vtanamenjevoceniučinka,kispremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, pre-dlaganavrsta merljivihciljevinusklajenih merljivih kazalnikov.
59.While it is correct that Member States needs cannotalwaysbesatisfiedat100 % mainly due to the lack of resources, the Commission makeseveryeffortto meet Member States requestsinthelargest possible manner.
59.Čepravjeres,dapotrebedržavčlanicne morejo biti vedno v celotiizpolnjene, predvsem zaradi pomanjkanja virov, si Komisija prizadeva, da bi v največji možni meri izpolnjevala njihove zahteve.