natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Accordingly, the national court asks whether Article 20(1) of Directive 2003/54 precludes that derogating system, which removes the obligation to allow third parties open access to certain energy supply systems without the technical capacities of those systems having to be taken into account.
Predložitveno sodi�če se zato spra�uje, ali člen 20(1) Direktive 2003/54 nasprotuje tej ureditvi odstopanja, s katero se oprosti obveznost omogočanja prostega dostopa tretjim stranem do nekaterih omrežij za oskrbo z energijo, ne da bi se upo�tevale tehnične zmogljivosti teh omrežij.
With a view to answering the question referred, it is necessary to interpret Article 20 of Directive 2003/54 in the light of the objectives of that directive and of its provisions in order to determine whether the system at issue in the main proceedings comes within the scope of that directive and whether Article 20 thereof precludes a provision such as the first point of Paragraph 110(1) of the EnWG, which dispenses with the obligation to provide third parties with open access to certain energy supply systems.
Za odgovor na postavljeno vpra�anje je treba člen 20 Direktive 2003/54 razlagati v smislu ciljev te direktive in njenih določb, da bi preverili, ali zadevno omrežje v postopku v glavni stvari spada na področje uporabe te direktive in ali navedeni člen 20 nasprotuje taki določbi, kot je člen 110(1), točka 1, EnWG, s katero se oprosti obveznost omogočanja prostega dostopa tretjim stranem do nekaterih omrežij za oskrbo z energijo.
It is appropriate to recall that Directive 2003/54 repealed and replaced Directive 96/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity (OJ 1997 L 27, p. 20).
Treba je opozoriti, da je bila z Direktivo 2003/54 razveljavljena in nadome�čena Direktiva 96/92/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. decembra 1996 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z električno energijo (UL 1997, L 27, str. 20).
It follows from recitals (1) and (2) in the preamble to Directive 2003/54 that it was adopted because of existing shortcomings in achieving the creation of an internal market in electricity after implementation of Directive 96/92.
Iz prve in druge uvodne izjave Direktive 2003/54 izhaja, da je bila sprejeta po uveljavitvi Direktive 96/92 zaradi večjih pomanjkljivosti, ki so ovirale možnost oblikovanja notranjega trga z električno energijo.
The objective of Directive 2003/54 is therefore to improve the operation of that market.
Cilj Direktive 2003/54 je torej izbolj�anje delovanje tega trga.
According to recital (5) in the preamble to Directive 2003/54, one of the main obstacles in arriving at a fully operational and competitive internal market relates to issues of access to the network, tarification issues and different degrees of market opening between Member States.
V skladu s peto uvodno izjavo Direktive 2003/54 je ena glavnih ovir na poti k popolnoma operativnemu in konkurenčnemu notranjemu trgu povezana z vpra�anjem dostopa do omrežja, postavitve cen in razlik med državami članicami v stopnji odprtosti trgov.
Recitals (6) and (7) in the preamble to that directive state that, for competition to function, non-discriminatory, transparent and fairly priced network access is of paramount importance in bringing about the internal electricity market.
Šesta in sedma uvodna izjava navedene direktive opredeljujeta, da je za dobro delovanje konkurence nujen nediskriminatoren in pregleden dostop do omrežja, ki bo na voljo za primerno ceno in je bistvenega pomena za vzpostavitev notranjega trga z električno energijo.
Articles 16 to 20 of Directive 96/92 provided for a negotiated system of access to electricity transmission and distribution systems.
Členi od 16 do 20 Direktive 96/92 so določali sistem pogodbenega dostopa do omrežij za prenos in distribucijo električne energije.
The Community legislature decided to bring an end to that system in order to create more openness in the internal electricity market, as is apparent from the proposal for a directive submitted by the Commission on 13 March 2001 (COM (2001) 125 final, OJ 2001 C 240 E, p. 60).
Zakonodajalec skupnosti se je odločil, da ukine ta sistem, da bi �e bolj odprl notranji trg električne energije, kot izhaja iz predloga direktive, ki ga je predstavila Komisija 13. maja 2001 (COM (2001) 125 konč., UL C 240 E, str. 60).
In that regard, it is appropriate to bear in mind that, in the context of the interpretation of Articles 7(5) and 16 of Directive 96/92, the Court has emphasised the general nature of the principle of nondiscrimination between users of systems (see, to that effect, Case C-17/03 VEMW and Others [2005] ECR I-4983, paragraphs 42 to 46).
V zvezi s tem je teba opozoriti, da je Sodi�če v okviru razlage členov 7(5) in 16 Direktive 96/92 poudarilo splo�nost načela nediskriminacije med uporabniki omrežij (v tem smislu glej sodbo z dne 7. junija 2005 v zadevi VEMW in drugi, C-17/03, ZOdl., str. I-4983, točke od 42 do 46).
Recital (4) in the preamble to Directive 2003/54 states that a fully open market must enable all consumers freely to choose their suppliers and all suppliers freely to deliver to their customers.
Četrta uvodna izjava Direktive 2003/54 opozarja, da mora popolnoma odprt trg vsem odjemalcem omogočati svobodno izbiro dobaviteljev, tem dobaviteljem pa, da svoje proizvode svobodno dobavijo svojim odjemalcem.
As the Advocate General rightly observed in point 72 of his Opinion, these two rights are necessarily linked. In order for customers to be able
Kot je generalni pravobranilec pravilno poudaril v točki 72 sklepnih predlogov, sta ti dve pravici nujno povezani.
2008 — CASE C-439/06 to choose freely their suppliers, it is necessary that suppliers should have the right to access the different transmission and distribution systems which carry electricity to the customers.
Namreč, da bi odjemalci lahko prosto izbrali svoje dobavitelje, morajo ti imeti možnost dostopa do različnih prenosnih in distribucijskih omrežij, ki pripeljejo električno energijo do odjemalcev.
It follows that open third-party access to transmission and distribution systems constitutes one of the essential measures which the Member States are required to implement in order to bring about the internal market in electricity.
Iz teh ugotovitev izhaja, da je prost dostop tretjih strani do prenosnih in distribucijskih omrežij eden od bistvenih ukrepov, ki jih morajo države članice izvesti, da se ustvari ustrezen notranji trg električne energije.
The principle of open access applies, according to Article 20(1) of Directive 2003/54, to electricity transmission and distribution systems.
Načelo prostega dostopa se v skladu s členom 20(1) Direktive 2003/54 uporablja za omrežja za prenos in distribucijo električne energije.
Points 3 and 5 of Article 2 of that directive define the notions of ‘transmission’ and ‘distribution’.
Člen 2, točki 3 in 5, iste direktive opredeljuje pojma „prenos“ in „distribucija“.
Transmission is defined as the transport of electricity on the extra high-voltage and high-voltage interconnected system with a view to its delivery to final customers or to distributors.
Prenos pomeni transport električne energije na zelovisokonapetostnem in visokonapetostnem povezanem omrežju z namenom dostave električne energije končnim odjemalcem ali distributerjem.
Distribution is the transport of electricity on high-voltage, medium voltage and low voltage distribution systems with a view to its delivery to customers.
Distribucija pa pomeni transport električne energije po visoko-, srednje- in nizkonapetostnem distribucijskem omrežju z namenom dobave odjemalcem. Prenos in distribucija ne vključujeta dobave.
The notion of ‘supply’ is defined in point 19 of Article 2 of Directive 2003/54 as the sale of electricity to customers.
Pojem „dobava“ je opredeljen v členu 2, točka 19, Direktive 2003/54 kot prodaja električne energije odjemalcem.
It follows from those definitions that, first, a transmission system is an interconnected system used to transport electricity at extra-high and high voltage for sale to final customers or to distributors and, second, a distribution system is a system used to transport electricity at high, medium or low voltage for sale to wholesale or final customers.
Iz teh opredelitev izhaja, da prenosno omrežje pomeni omrežje, povezano z drugimi omrežji, ki vodi električno energijo zelo visoke in visoke napetosti, ki je namenjena prodaji končnim odjemalcem oziroma distributerjem, ter da distribucijsko omrežje pomeni omrežje, ki vodi električno energijo visoke, srednje in nizke napetosti, ki je namenjena prodaji grosističnim oziroma končnim odjemalcem.
According to certain observations submitted to the Court, the system at issue in the main proceedings is neither a transmission system nor a distribution system and for that reason does not come within the scope of Directive 2003/54.
Na podlagi nekaterih stali�č, predloženih Sodi�ču, naj zadevno omrežje v postopku v glavni stvari ne bi bilo niti prenosno niti distribucijsko omrežje in naj torej ne bi spadalo na področje uporabe Direktive 2003/54.
First, it is submitted, it constitutes a site network and does not affect competition because of its low consumption and, second, the operation of that system is merely an activity ancillary to the main activity of operating the airport.
Po eni strani naj bi �lo za omrežje na območju obratovalnega sistema, ki naj zaradi majhne porabe ne bi vplivalo na konkurenco, po drugi strani pa naj bi bilo upravljanje tega omrežja le dopolnilna dejavnost glavni dejavnosti, ki je upravljanje letali�ča.
With regard, first of all, to the nature of transmission and distribution systems within the meaning of Directive 2003/54 and the quantity of electricity transported on those systems, it is appropriate to note that the sole distinguishing criterion between transmission and distribution is the voltage of that electricity.
Prvič, glede narave prenosnih in distribucijskih omrežij v smislu Direktive 2003/54 ter količine električne energije, prene�ene prek teh omrežij, je treba poudariti, da je napetost te električne energije edino merilo za razlikovanje med prenosom in distribucijo.
Within the meaning of points 3 and 5 of Article 2 of that directive, a transmission system concerns electricity at extra-high and high voltage and a distribution system ensures transmission of electricity at high, medium or low voltage.
V smislu člena 2, točki 3 in 5, te direktive namreč prenosno omrežje zadeva električno energijo zelo visoke in visoke napetosti, medtem ko distribucijsko omrežje zagotavlja prenos električne energije visoke, srednje ali nizke napetosti.
Directive 2003/54 refers to electricity consumption only in order to define the notions of ‘small isolated system’ and ‘micro isolated system’, which give rise to the grant of derogations from certain obligations laid down by the Directive.
Direktiva 2003/54 se sklicuje na porabo električne energije le glede opredelitve pojmov „majhno izdvojeno omrežje“ in „mikro izdvojeno omrežje“, ki sta temelj za oprostitev nekaterih obveznosti, določenih s to direktivo.
The Community legislature did not therefore intend to exclude particular transmission or distribution systems from the scope of Directive 2003/54 by reason of their size or consumption of electricity.
Zakonodajalec skupnosti torej ni želel izključiti nekaterih prenosnih in distribucijskih omrežij s področja uporabe Direktive 2003/54 zaradi njihove velikosti ali njihove porabe električne energije.
It should be noted that the first point of Paragraph 110(1) of the EnWG does not define the systems which come within its scope on the basis of their consumption of electricity.
Treba je opozoriti, da člen 110(1), točka 1, EnWG ne opredeljuje omrežij, ki spadajo na njegovo področje uporabe na podlagi njihove porabe električne energije.
That provision refers to systems ‘located on a geographically connected operation zone and which predominantly serve to supply the energy needs of the undertaking itself or of connected undertakings’.
Ta določba se namreč nana�a na omrežja, ki „se nahajajo na obratovalnem območju, ki je prostorsko povezano, in ki služijo zlasti oskrbi z energijo samega podjetja ali priključenih podjetij“.
With regard, secondly, to the operation and purpose of transmission and distribution systems, Directive 2003/54 states, for both types of system, that the electricity is transported with a view to delivery, without there being actual supply, and that the operator is responsible for operating, ensuring the maintenance of and, if necessary, developing the system in a given area and for guaranteeing its longterm capacity.
Drugič, z Direktivo 2003/54 je glede upravljanja in namena prenosnega oziroma distribucijskega omrežja, za obe vrsti omrežij, določeno, da se električna energija prena�a za dobavo, ne da bi bila vključena sama dobava, in da je upravljavec odgovoren za obratovanje, vzdrževanje in za razvoj omrežja na danem območju zato, da bi zagotovil dolgoročno zmogljivost omrežja.
Furthermore, Article 13 of Directive 2003/54 requires undertakings that own or are responsible for distribution systems to designate distribution system operators.
Poleg tega člen 13 Direktive 2003/54 določa, da tisti, ki imajo v lasti distribucijska omrežja oziroma so zanje odgovorni, imenujejo enega ali več upravljavcev teh omrežij.
It is not apparent either from that provision or from any other provision of that directive that only undertakings acting principally as distribution system operators are subject to the obligation to allow open access to the systems.
Niti iz te določbe niti iz kake druge določbe iste direktive ne izhaja, da morajo prost dostop do omrežja omogočati le podjetja, katerih glavna dejavnost je upravljanje distribucijskega omrežja.
It is appropriate to observe in that regard that the first point of Paragraph 110(1) of the EnWG does not stipulate whether the activity of operating the energy supply system must, for the operator, be a principal or ancillary activity for the purpose of defining the systems which come within its scope.
Glede tega je treba je opozoriti, da v členu 110(1), točka 1, EnWG ni nobene opredelitve, ali gre za glavno ali dopolnilno dejavnost upravljavcev v zvezi z upravljanjem omrežja za oskrbo z energijo, da bi bilo mogoče opredeliti omrežja, ki spadajo na njeno področje uporabe.
It is apparent from the decision for reference and the observations submitted to the Court that the system at issue in the main proceedings supplies electricity to FLH itself and to 93 other undertakings, all of which are located on the site of Leipzig/Halle airport.
Iz predložitvene odločbe in iz stali�č, predloženih Sodi�ču, izhaja, da zadevno omrežje v postopku v glavni stvari oskrbuje z električno energijo družbo FLH in 93 drugih podjetij, ki se nahajajo na letali�ču Leipzig/Halle.
That system’s consumption was 22 200 MWh in 2004, of which 3 800 MWh were consumed by undertakings other than FLH.
Poraba tega omrežja je bila leta 2004 22.200MWh, od katerih so 3800 MWh porabila preostala podjetja, brez družbe FLH.
According to the decision for reference, it was forecast that those undertakings’ share of the consumption would reach 8 000 MWh in 2007.
V predložitveni odločbi je navedeno, da je bilo predvideno, da naj bi del porabe teh podjetij leta 2007 presegel 8000 MWh.
It follows that FLH does not operate a transmission system, as the electricity transported is not at extra-high or high voltage, but rather that it operates a system which transports electricity with a view to its supply to customers and which can be classified as an electricity distribution system within the meaning of point 5 of Article 2 of Directive 2003/54.
Iz tega izhaja, da družba FLH ne uporablja prenosnega omrežja, kajti prene�ena električna energija ni zelo visoke oziroma visoke napetosti, ampak uporablja omrežje, prek katerega se prena�a električna energija za dobavo porabnikom in ki pomeni omrežje za distribucijo električne energije v smislu člena 2, točka 5, Direktive 2003/54.
Article 20(1) of that directive leaves the Member States free to take the measures necessary to establish a system of third-party access to transmission or distribution systems.
Člen 20(1) te direktive prepu�ča državam članicam, da sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za uvedbo sistema dostopa tretjih strani do prenosnih in distribucijskih omrežij.
It follows that, in accordance with Article 249 EC, the Member States have authority over the form and the methods to be used to implement such a system.
Iz tega izhaja, da so v skladu s členom 249 ES države članice pristojne za izbiro oblike in metod za uvedbo tega sistema.
Having regard to the importance of the principle of open access to transmission or distribution systems, that margin of discretion does not, however, authorise them to depart from that principle except in those cases where Directive 2003/54 lays down exceptions or derogations.
Ob upo�tevanju pomena načela prostega dostopa do prenosnih ali distribucijskih omrežij jim ta diskrecijska pravica vendarle ne dovoljuje, da izključijo navedeno načelo, razen v primerih, za katere Direktiva 2003/54 določa izjeme ali odstopanja.
It is therefore only where a provision such as the first point of Paragraph 110(1) of the EnWG comes within the scope of those exceptions or derogations that it will be compatible with Directive 2003/54.
Določba, kot je člen 110(1), točka 1, EnWG, bi bila torej v skladu z Direktivo 2003/54 le, če bi spadala na področje uporabe teh izjem ali odstopanj.
Firstly, Article 20(2) of Directive 2003/54 provides that the operator of a distribution system may refuse access where it lacks the necessary capacity, on condition that duly substantiated reasons are given for such refusal.
Prvič, člen 20(2) Direktive 2003/54 določa, da lahko upravljavec distribucijskega omrežja zavrne dostop do svojega omrežja, če nima potrebnih zmogljivosti in pod pogojem, da obrazloži in utemelji to zavrnitev.
This possibility of refusing access to the system is, however, to be assessed on a case-by-case basis and does not authorise the Member States to lay down those derogations in a general manner without, in respect of each operator, a concrete assessment of the technical incapacity of the system to meet the demand for access from third parties.
Vendar se ta možnost zavrnitve dostopa do omrežja presoja od primera do primera in državam članicam ne omogoča, da ta odstopanja določijo na splo�no in brez konkretne presoje za vsakega upravljavca, ali njegove tehnične zmogljivosti omrežja lahko zadostijo zahtevi po prostem dostopu tretjih strani.
Secondly, Article 3(8) of Directive 2003/54 allows the Member States not to apply the provisions of Article 20 thereof where the application of those provisions would obstruct the performance of the obligations imposed on electricity undertakings in the general economic interest and in so far as the development of trade would not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Community.
Drugič, člen 3(8) Direktive 2003/54 državam članicam omogoča, da ne uporabijo določb člena 20 te direktive, če bi uporaba teh določb ovirala izpolnjevanje obveznosti, ki so naložene elektroenergetskim podjetjem v splo�nem gospodarskem interesu, in če razvoj trgovanja ne bi bil prizadet do tak�ne mere, ki bi bila v nasprotju z interesi Skupnosti.
It is appropriate to note that Article 3(2) and (3) of Directive 2003/54 applies to the public-service obligations which Member States may impose on electricity undertakings in the general economic interest.
Treba je opozoriti, da se člen 3(2) in (3) Direktive 2003/54 nana�a na obveznosti javnih storitev, ki jih države članice lahko naložijo elektroenergetskim podjetjem v splo�nem gospodarskem interesu.
It follows from recital (26) in the preamble to that directive that public-service requirements are to be interpreted on a national basis.
Iz �estindvajsete uvodne izjave te direktive izhaja, da se zahteve v zvezi z javnimi storitvami razlagajo na nacionalni ravni.
It follows from Article 3(8) of Directive 2003/54 that the Member States may decide to restrict third-party rights of access to transmission and distribution systems in order to ensure the supply of a public electricity service.
Iz člena 3(8) Direktive 2003/54 izhaja, da se države članice lahko odločijo, da bodo omejile pravico dostopa tretjih strani do prenosnih in distribucijskih omrežij, da bi zagotovile izvajanje elektroenergetskih javnih storitev.
However, in order to do so, the Member States must, on the one hand, ascertain whether an unrestricted right of access to the systems would obstruct the performance by the system operators of their public-service obligations and, on the other, determine whether that performance cannot be achieved by other means which do not impact adversely on the right of access to the systems, which is one of the rights enshrined in Directive 2003/54.
Vendar morajo države članice, da bi to storile, po eni strani preveriti, ali bi neomejena pravica do dostopa do omrežij ovirala upravljavce omrežij pri izpolnjevanju njihovih obveznosti glede javnih storitev, po drugi strani pa raziskati, ali te izpolnitve ni mogoče opraviti z drugimi metodami, ki ne bi ogrožale pravice do prostega dostopa do omrežij, ki je ena od pravic, določenih z Direktivo 2003/54.
It is appropriate to observe that the derogation from the principle of open access to energy supply systems contained in the first point of Paragraph 110(1) of the EnWG is not justified by the risk that the operators of systems coming within the scope of that provision would be prevented from performing their public-service obligations by the fact of that open access.
Treba je opozoriti, da odstopanje od načela prostega dostopa do omrežij za oskrbo z energijo, navedeno v členu 110(1), točka 1, EnWG, ni utemeljeno s tveganjem, da upravljavci omrežij, ki spadajo na področje uporabe te določbe, zaradi tega prostega dostopa ne bi mogli izpolniti svojih obveznosti javnih storitev.
That derogation can be justified only by the geographical or legal configuration of the area in which those systems are operated.
To odstopanje je namreč upravičeno le z geografsko konfiguracijo oziroma pravnim položajem območja, na katerem se ta omrežja upravljajo.
Nor is it alleged by the German Government that the Federal Republic of Germany adopted the first point of Paragraph 110(1) of the EnWG for the purpose of implementing Article 3(8) of Directive 2003/54.
Nem�ka vlada tudi ni navedla, da je Zvezna republika Nemčija sprejela člen 110(1), točka 1, EnWG, da bi uveljavila člen 3(8) Direktive 2003/54.
Thirdly, Article 26(1) of Directive 2003/54 provides that Member States which can demonstrate that there are substantial problems for the operation of small isolated systems may apply for derogations from certain provisions of Directive 2003/54, including Article 20 thereof.
Tretjič, člen 26(1) navedene direktive določa, da države članice, ki lahko dokažejo, da obstajajo huj�e težave pri obratovanju majhnih izdvojenih omrežij, lahko zaprosijo za odstopanja od nekaterih določb Direktive 2003/54, zlasti od člena 20.
Such derogations, however, require the agreement of the Commission, which takes the form of a decision published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Vendar je za ta odstopanja potrebno soglasje Komisije, ki ima obliko odločbe, ki se objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Derogations of this kind have been granted to the Republic of Cyprus, by decision of 25 September 2006 (OJ 2006 L 270, p.
Taka odstopanja so bila odobrena Republiki Ciper z odločbo z dne 25. septembra 2006 (UL L 270, str.
72), and to the Republic of Malta, by decision of 28 November 2006 (OJ 2006 L 332, p. 32).
72) in Republiki Malti z odločbo z dne 28. novembra 2006 (UL L 332, str. 32).
It must be stated that the Federal Republic of Germany has neither sought nor obtained from the Commission a decision on derogation under Article 26(1) of Directive 2003/54.
Treba je ugotoviti, da Zvezna republika Nemčija ni niti zaprosila niti od Komisije pridobila nobene odločbe o odstopanju na podlagi člena 26(1) Direktive 2003/54.