natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
15 — Case C-228/00 Commission v Germany [2003] ECR I-1439, paragraph 46; Case C-458/00 Commission v Luxembourg [2003] ECR I-1553, paragraph 37; and Case C-116/01 SITA [2003] ECR I-2969, paragraph 53.
12 – Sodbe z dne 12. novembra 1969 v zadevi Stauder (29/69, Recueil, str. 419, točka 3); z dne 24. oktobra 1996 v zadevi Kraaijeveld in drugi (C-72/95, Recueil, str.
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME co-incineration plants were not covered by the existing directives. 17
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME saj po mnenju Komisije naprave za sosežig v prej�njih direktivah niso bile zajete. 17
The differences essentially arise by virtue of the rules limited to incineration plants of Article 6(1) of the Waste Incineration Directive.
Razlike so predvsem v določbah člena 6(1) Direktive o sežiganju odpadkov, ki se nana�ajo le na sežigalnice.
They establish the residue in total organic carbon content and the loss on ignition in slag and bottom ashes and require an additional incinerator.
V členu je določena količina ostanka skupnega organskega ogljika oz. žarilna izguba v žlindri in pepelu, zahtevan pa je tudi pomožni gorilnik.
16With respect, at least, to the additional incinerator, exceptions are possible under Article 6(4), provided that the values laid down under the directive are none the less observed.
16 V skladu s členom 6(4) so vsaj v zvezi s pomožnim gorilnikom možne izjeme, če se upo�teva v Direktivi določene vrednosti.
By the Waste Incineration Directive, the legislature, at the very least, harmonised the requirements for co-incineration plants with those for incineration plants.
Zakonodajalec je z Direktivo o sežiganju odpadkov zahteve za naprave za sosežig vsaj približal zahtevam, ki veljajo za sežigalnice.
Its aim was that the same requirements should apply to the part of the fuel consisting of waste as to the incineration of waste as such.
Slednje težijo k temu, da bi za delež odpadkov v gorivu veljale enake zahteve kot za sežig odpadkov.
However, limitative values were also laid down for the remainder of the fuel, which appear, in part, to be stricter than the requirements under Directive 2001/80.
Vendar so tudi za preostala goriva določene mejne vrednosti, ki se deloma zdijo strožje kot zahteve, ki jih vsebuje Direktiva 2001/80.
If untreated mixed municipal waste or more than 40% hazardous waste is incinerated, the limitative values applicable to incineration plants set out in Article 7(4) and the second subparagraph of Article 7(2) of the Waste Incineration Directive apply.
Če se sežigajo nepredelani me�ani komunalni odpadki ali če se sežge več kot 40 % nevarnih odpadkov, potem v skladu s členom 7(4) oz. 7(2), drugi pododstavek, veljajo celo mejne vrednosti za sežigalnice.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the requirements of the Waste Incineration
Poleg tega je treba opozoriti na to, da zahteve Direktive o sežiganju odpadkov niso
These differences were specifically provided for by the Community legislature.
Te razlike je izrecno in v prav taki obliki predvidel zakonodajalec Skupnosti.
In addition, it seems to have proceeded from the view that the requirements for co-incin-eration plants laid down in the Waste Incineration Directive would, on their own, clearly strengthen environmental protection.
Zdi se, da mu je za izhodi�če služilo to, da že zahteve v zvezi z napravami za sosežig, ki so predvidene v Direktivi o sežiganju odpadkov, občutno dvigajo raven varovanja okolja.
In that regard, it is apparent from the explanatory memorandum to the Waste Incineration Directive that, in the Commission’s view,
To izhaja iz obrazložitvenega memoranduma predloga Direktive o sežiganju odpadkov,
See, however, the contrary view in the Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs in Case C-228/00 Commission v Germany (cited in footnote 11), which, at least in cases of waste recycling, assumed that those directives applied.
Glej tudi nasprotno stali�če generalnega pravobranilca Jacobsa v sklepnih predlogih v zadevi C-228/00 (navedeni v opombi 11 zgoraj), ki je vsaj v primerih predelave odpadkov izhajal iz uporabnosti teh dveh Direktiv.
The Court has not ruled on that question.
Sodi�če se v zvezi s tem vpra�anjem ni izreklo.
16 — See points 4 and 21 et seq. above.
16 – V zvezi s tem glej zgoraj, točka 4 in 21 ter naslednja.
Directive are not exhaustive, since in accordance with recital 13 in the preamble thereto more stringent requirements may be laid down on the basis of Directive 96/61.
KOKOTT – ZADEVA C-251/07 dokončne, saj je mogoče – v skladu s trinajsto uvodno izjavo Direktive – na podlagi Direktive 96/61 določiti strožje zahteve.
In add -ition, especially where the latter directive is not applicable, Member States may lay down more stringent rules under Article 176 EC. 18
Poleg tega lahko države članice – posebej v primerih, ko ne velja zadnjenavedena Direktiva – v skladu s členom 176 ES sprejmejo strožjo ureditev. 18
As the Swedish Government submits, classification as a co-incineration plant cannot be based only on whether or not existing energy is used in the incineration of waste.
Kot zatrjuje �vedska vlada, uvrstitev naprave med naprave za sosežig ne more biti odvisna le od tega, ali se energija, ki nastane pri sežiganju odpadkov, tudi uporabi.
Rather, it is laid down twice in the Waste Incineration Directive, that is to say, in Article 4(2)(b) and Article 6(6), that incineration plants must also recover the waste heat, so far as that is feasible or practicable.
Nasprotno, Direktiva o sežiganju odpadkov celo dvakrat, namreč v členih 4(2)(b) in 6(6), določa, da morajo, če je to izvedljivo oz. možno, tudi sežigalnice uporabljati nastalo toploto.
Whether, in fact, almost all plants in which waste is incinerated are to be classified as co-incineration plants, as the Swedish Government fears, requires a practical examination.
Da bi se ugotovilo, ali je v resnici treba skoraj vse naprave, v katerih se sežiga odpadke, uvrstiti med naprave za sosežig, kot skrbi �vedsko vlado, je potreben praktičen preizkus.
In that regard, the question is above all one of how the main purpose of a plant is identified.
V zvezi s tem je predvsem pomembno, kaj se označi kot glavni namen neke naprave.
That must be established on the basis of objective criteria, 19 particularly since the operator’s subjective intentions cannot be examined.
Slednjega je treba določiti na podlagi objektivnih okoli�čin 19, ker je namen, ki ga določi upravljavec, določen subjektivno in ne more biti predmet preizkusa.
18 — See Case C-6/03 Deponiezweckverband Eiterköpfe [2005] ECR I-2753.
18 – Glej sodbo z dne 14. aprila 2005 v zadevi Deponiezweckverband Eiterköpfe (C-6/03, ZOdl., str. I-2753).
That is even more the case if the operators of the plants expect to cease energy production from time to time if suitable waste is not available.
To velja toliko bolj, če uprav -ljavci naprave računajo, da se proizvodnja energije v primeru, da primernih odpadkov ne bo na razpolago, ustavi.
That is not the case if the plant is largely or, at times, completely operated using other fuels. 20
Drugače je, če naprava deluje predvsem ali občasno celo povsem s pomočjo drugih goriv. 20
489 et seq. (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/environment/ippc/brefs/lcp_bref_0706.pdf), are based on the assumption that waste forms only a small part of the fuel used.
489 in naslednje (http://ec.europa.eu/ comm/environment/ippc/brefs/lcp_bref_0706.pdf), se opirajo na predpostavko, da odpadki predstavljajo le majhen del uporabljenih goriv.
The Commission prepared that document in collaboration with experts from the Member States on the basis of Directive 96/61.
Komisija je ta dokument pripravila na podlagi Direktive 96/61v sodelovanju s strokovnjaki iz držav članic.
Since any analysis must relate to each individual plant, in principle even to the specific boiler and the additional equipment that is associated with it, the main purpose of the undertaking as a whole cannot be decisive.
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME pa obravnavamo posamezne naprave in v bistvu celo konkretne kotle ter pripadajočo nadaljnjo opremo, glavni namen podjetja ne more biti odločilen.
A scientific approach to waste incineration is also clearly important.
Pomembno je gotovo tudi, kako je sežiganje odpadkov obravnavano v gospodarskem smislu.
If the waste has to be purchased and is substituted for expensive alternative fuels, that tends to support the theory that the main purpose is the production of energy.
Če je treba odpadke kupiti in nadomestiti dražja alternativna goriva, to govori, da je glavni namen naprave pridobivanje energije.
An essential aspect of the production of district heating is also the investment costs of the construction of the infrastructure for the distribution of heat compared with the costs of the construction of the boiler.
Odločilna pri pridobivanju toplote za daljinsko ogrevanje je tudi primerjava med stro�ki investicij, ki so potrebne za postavitev infrastrukture za razdeljevanje toplote, in stro�ki, ki so povezani s postavit -vijo kurilne naprave.
However, the Commission also rightly submitted in response to a question posed at the hearing that the main purpose of a plant is not permanently fixed, but the essential aspects can change.
Vendar je Komisija v odgovoru na vpra�anje na ustni obravnavi prav tako pravilno zatrdila, da glavni namen naprave ni za vedno določen, saj se odločilni dejavniki lahko spremenijo.
Thus it cannot be excluded that a new owner may change the operation of a plant in such a way that its main purpose must be reassessed.
Tako ni mogoče izključiti, da bo novi imetnik obratovanje naprave tako spremenil, da bo treba njen glavni namen presoditi znova.
If, however, fees are levied for the incineration which exceed the proceeds arising out of the production of energy, it is rather to be assumed that the incineration of waste is the main purpose.
Če pa se za sežig odpadkov zaračunavajo pristojbine, ki presegajo prihodke iz naslova pridobivanja energije, lahko sklepamo, da je glavni namen naprave sežiganje odpadkov.
That is even more the case if the plant is part of an infrastructure for waste disposal.
To velja toliko bolj, če je naprava del infrastrukture, ki je namenjena odstranjevanju odpadkov.
As the Commission also points out, contrary to the fears of the Swedish Government, it is, as regards the points of view set out above, of secondary importance whether the plant is operated by an undertaking whose main purpose is the management
Kot poudarja Komisija in v nasprotju z bojaznimi �vedske vlade, je v primerjavi s predstavljenim dejstvo, kaj je glavna dejavnost podjetja, ki napravo upravlja – ali ravnanje z odpadki ali morda pridobivanje energije – drugotnega pomena. Ker
In summary, it can thus be stated that the classification of a plant in which waste is incinerated depends on whether its main purpose is the thermal treatment of waste or the generation of energy or production of material products.
Tako lahko končno ugotovimo, da je uvrstitev naprave, v kateri se sežiga odpadke, odvisna od tega, ali je njen glavni namen termična obdelava odpadkov ali proizvodnja energije in izdelkov.
The main purpose must be determined on the basis of objective criteria.
Glavni namen je treba določiti na podlagi objektivnih okoli�čin.
I propose that the Court should answer the reference for a preliminary ruling as follows:
Zato Sodi�ču predlagam, naj na predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe odgovori tako:
However, it is possible to treat a number of mutually linked plants as one plant for the application of certain provisions of that directive if requirements for the avoidance of environmental harm and danger to health are not thereby circumvented.
Vendar je mogoče več naprav, ki so med seboj povezane, pri uporabi posameznih pravil te Direktive obravnavati kot eno napravo, če pri tem niso kr�ene določbe o preprečevanju negativnih učinkov na okolje in tveganja za zdravje ljudi.
The main purpose must be determined on the basis of object- ive criteria.
Glavni namen je treba določiti na podlagi objektivnih okoli�čin.
REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden), made by decision of 7 May 2007, received at the Court on 29 May 2007, in the proceedings
V zadevi C-251/07, katere predmet je predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe na podlagi člena 234 ES, ki ga je vložilo Högsta domstolen (�vedsko vrhovno sodi�če) z odločbo z dne 7. maja 2007, ki je prispela na Sodi�če 29. maja 2007, v postopku
2008 — CASE C-251/07
2008 – ZADEVA C-251/07 generalna pravobranilka: J. Kokott, sodna tajnica: C.
Advocate General: J. Kokott, Registrar: C. Strömholm, Administrator, having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 17 April 2008, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
Strömholm, administratorka, na podlagi pisnega postopka in obravnave z dne 17. aprila 2008, ob upo�tevanju stali�č, ki so jih predložili:
— the Austrian Government, by E. Riedl, Agent,
– za avstrijsko vlado E. Riedl, zastopnik,
— the Commission of the European Communities, by J.-B. Laignelot and P. Dejmek, acting as Agents, after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 22 May 2008,
– za Komisijo Evropskih skupnosti J.-B. Laignelot in P. Dejmek, zastopnika, po predstavitvi sklepnih predlogov generalne pravobranilke na obravnavi 22. maja 2008
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME gives the following
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME izreka naslednjo
This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Direct- ive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste (OJ 2000 L 332, p. 91).
Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe se nana�a na razlago Direktive 2000/76/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2000 o sežiganju odpadkov (UL L 332, str. 91).
The reference was made in the course of proceedings between Gävle Kraftvärme AB (‘Gävle Kraftvärme’) and the Länsstyrelsen i Gävleborgs län (Regional Authority of Gävleborg (‘the required authority’)) regarding an application for authorisation to operate a combined heat and power plant.
Ta predlog je bil vložen v okviru spora med Gävle Kraftvärme AB (v nadaljevanju: Gävle Kraftvärme) in Länsstyrelsen i Gävleborgs län (prefektura Gävleborg, v nadaljevanju: prefektura) zaradi pro�nje za izdajo dovoljenja za obratovanje obrata za soproizvodnjo toplote in elektrike.
39), as amended by Commission Decision 96/350/EC of 24 May 1996 (OJ 1996 L 135, p.
39), kot je bila spremenjena z Odločbo Komisije 96/350/ES z dne 24. maja 1996 (UL L 135, str.
32) (‘Directive 75/442’), provides:
32, v nadaljevanju: Direktiva 75/442), je določeno:
2008 — CASE C-251/07
2008 – ZADEVA C-251/07
‘Member States shall take appropriate measures to encourage:
„Države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe, da spodbudijo:
(a) first, the prevention or reduction of waste production and its harmfulness …
(a) prvič, preprečevanje ali zmanj�evanje nastajanja odpadkov in njihove �kodljivosti […]
(b) second:
(b) drugič:
— the recovery of waste by means of recycling, re-use or reclamation or any other process with a view to extracting secondary raw materials; or
– predelavo odpadkov z recikliranjem, ponovno uporabo ali obnavljanjem ali katerim koli drugim postopkom za pridobivanje sekundarnih surovin ali
— the use of waste as a source of energy.’
– uporabo odpadkov kot vir energije.“
Directive 75/442 was repealed and codified with effect from 17 May 2006 by Dir -ective 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on
Direktiva 75/442 je bila razveljavljena in kodificirana z učinkom od 17. maja 2006 dalje z Direktivo 2006/12/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2006
The wording of Article 3(1) of Directive 75/442 was taken, in almost identical terms, from Article 3(1) of Directive 2006/12.
Člen 3(1) Direktive 75/442 je bil povzet z v bistvu enakim besedilom v člen 3(1) Direktive 2006/12.
… a high level of environmental protection and human health protection requires the setting and maintaining of stringent operational conditions, technical requirements and emissions limit values for plants incinerating or co-incinerating waste within the Community.
Za visoko raven varstva okolja in varovanja zdravja ljudi je […] treba določiti in ohranjati stroge pogoje obratovanja, tehnične zahteve in mejne vrednosti emisij za naprave, ki sežigajo ali sosežigajo odpadke v Skupnosti.
The limit values set should prevent or limit as far as practicable negative effects on the environment and the resulting risks to human health.
Določene mejne vrednosti naj bi preprečile ali omejile negativne učinke na okolje in zaradi njih nastalo tveganje za zdravje ljudi, kolikor je to izvedljivo.
Compliance with the emissions limit values laid down by this Directive should be regarded as a necessary but not sufficient condition for compliance with the requirements of [Council] Directive 96/61/EC [of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (OJ 1996 L 257, p. 26)].
Skladnost z mejnimi vrednostmi emisij, ki jih določa ta direktiva, je treba imeti za potreben, vendar ne zadosten pogoj za skladnost z zahtevami Direktive [Sveta] 96/61/ES [z dne 24. septembra 1996 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja (UL L 257, str. 26)].
Such compliance may involve more stringent emissions limit values for the pollutants envisaged by this Directive, emissions limit values for other substances and other media, and other appropriate conditions.
Taka skladnost lahko vključuje strožje mejne vrednosti emisij za onesnaževala, predvidena v tej direktivi, mejne vrednosti emisije za druge snovi in druge prvine okolja ter druge ustrezne pogoje.
The requirements for recovering the heat generated by the incineration or co-incineration process and for minimising and recycling residues resulting from the operation of incineration or co-incineration plants will assist in meeting the objectives of Article 3 on the waste hierarchy of Directive 75/442/EEC.’
Zahteve za izrabo toplote, proizvedene pri postopku sežiganja ali sosežiganja, ter za čim večje zmanj�anje in recikliranje ostankov, nastalih pri obratovanju sežigalnic ali naprav za sosežig, bodo pripomogle k doseganju ciljev o hierarhiji ravnanja z odpadki iz člena 3 Direktive 75/442/EGS“.
As is apparent from the first paragraph of Article 1 of Directive 2000/76, its aim is to prevent or to limit as far as practicable negative effects on the environment, in par -ticular pollution by emissions into air, soil, surface water and groundwater, and the resulting risks to human health, from the incineration and co-incineration of waste.
Kot izhaja iz člena 1, prvi odstavek, Direktive 2000/76 je njen cilj pri sežiganju in sosežiganju odpadkov preprečiti ali omejiti negativne učinke na okolje, zlasti onesnaževanje z emisijami v zrak, tla, povr�insko vodo in podzemno vodo, če je to izvedljivo, ter iz tega izhajajoče tveganje za zdravje ljudi.
The second paragraph of that article states that that aim is to be met, inter alia, by means of stringent operational conditions and technical requirements and through setting emissions limit values for waste incineration and co-incineration plants.
V drugem odstavku navedenega člena je pojasnjeno, da se ta cilj doseže zlasti s strogimi pogoji obratovanja in tehničnimi zahtevami ter z določitvijo mejnih vrednosti emisij za sežigalnice in naprave za sosežig odpadkov.
The expressions ‘incineration plant’ and ‘co-incineration plant’ are defined in Article 3(4) and (5) of Directive 2000/76 as follows:
Pojma „sežigalnica“ in „naprava za sosežig“ sta opredeljena v členu 3, točki 4 in 5, Direktive 2000/76 tako, da pomeni:
‘4. “incineration plant” means any stationary or mobile technical unit and equipment dedicated to the thermal treatment of wastes with or without recovery of the combustion heat generated.
„(4) ‚sežigalnica‘ katero koli nepremično ali premično tehnično enoto in opremo, namenjeno toplotni obdelavi odpadkov z izkori�čanjem pridobljene zgorevalne toplote ali brez njega.
This definition covers the site and the entire incineration plant including all incineration lines, waste reception, storage, on site pretreatment facilities, waste[-,] fuel[-] and air-supply systems, boiler, facilities for the treatment of exhaust gases, on-site facilities for treatment or storage of residues and waste water, stack,
Ta opredelitev vključuje kraj in celotno napravo za sežiganje, vključno z vsemi linijami za sežiganje, sprejemom odpadkov, skladi�čem, napravami za predobdelavo na kraju samem, sistemi za oskrbo z odpadki-gorivom in zrakom, kotlom,
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME devices and systems for controlling incineration operations, recording and monitoring incineration conditions;
GÄVLE KRAFTVÄRME napravami za či�čenje odpadnih plinov, napravami za obdelavo ali skladi�čenje ostankov in odpadne vode na kraju samem, odvodnikom, napravami in sistemi za nadziranje postopkov sežiganja, zapisovanje in spremljanje pogojev sežiganja;
5. “co-incineration plant” means any stationary or mobile plant whose main purpose is the generation of energy or production of material products and:
(5) ‚naprava za sosežig‘ katero koli nepremično ali premično napravo, katere glavni namen je proizvodnja energije ali izdelkov in:
This definition covers the site and the entire plant including all co-incineration lines, waste reception, storage, on site pretreatment facilities, waste, fuel- and air-supply systems, boiler, facilities for the treatment of exhaust gases, on-site facilities for treatment or storage of residues and waste water, stack devices and systems for controlling incineration operations, recording and monitoring incineration conditions.’
Ta opredelitev vključuje kraj in celotno napravo, vključno z vsemi linijami za sosežig, sprejemom odpadkov, skladi�čem, napravami za predobdelavo na kraju samem, sistemi za oskrbo z odpadki, gorivom in zrakom, kotlom, napravami za či�čenje odpadnih plinov, napravami za obdelavo ali skladi�čenje ostankov in odpadne vode na kraju samem, odvodnikom, napravami in sistemi za nadziranje postopkov sežiganja, zapisovanje in spremljanje pogojev sežiganja“.
Article 3(12) of Directive 2000/76 defines the concept of ‘permit’ as follows:
V členu 13, točka 12, Direktive 2000/76 je opredeljen pojem „dovoljenje“ tako, da pomeni:
‘a written decision (or several such decisions) delivered by the competent authority granting authorisation to operate a plant, subject to certain conditions which guarantee that the plant complies with all the requirements of this Directive.
„pisno odločitev (ali več takih odločitev) pristojnega organa, s katero je ta odobril obratovanje naprave pod določenimi pogoji, ki zagotavljajo skladnost naprave z vsemi zahtevami te direktive.
A permit may cover one or more plants or parts of a plant on the same site operated by the same operator.’
Dovoljenje se lahko nana�a na eno ali več naprav ali delov naprave na istem kraju, ki jih upravlja isti upravljavec“.
Article 4(2) of that directive provides:
V členu 4(2) navedene direktive je določeno:
‘Without prejudice to Directive 96/61/EC, the application for a permit for an incineration or co-incineration plant to the competent authority shall include a description of the measures which are envisaged to guarantee that:
„Brez poseganja v Direktivo 96/61/ES vloga za dovoljenje za sežigalnico ali napravo za sosežig pristojnemu organu vključuje opis predvidenih ukrepov, ki zagotavljajo, da:
(b) the heat generated during the incineration and co-incineration process is recovered as far as practicable e.g. through combined heat and power, the generating of process steam or district heating;
(b) se pri sežigu ali sosežigu pridobljena toplota izrabi, kolikor je to izvedljivo, na primer s soproizvodnjo toplote in energije, proizvodnjo procesne pare ali daljinskim ogrevanjem;
Article 6(1) to (3) and (6) of the Directive provides:
V členu 6(1), (2), (3) in (6) iste direktive je določeno:
If necessary, appropriate techniques of waste pretreatment shall be used.
Če je potrebno, se uporabijo ustrezne metode predobdelave odpadkov.
Each line of the incineration plant shall be equipped with at least one auxiliary burner.
Vsaka linija sežigalnice mora biti opremljena z vsaj enim pomožnim gorilnikom.