natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3.1.4 The European Central Bank 77ACCESS TO STATISTICS ABOUT STOCKS AND FLOWS OF EURO BANKNOTES ...............................................................................................................77
3.1.4 Evropska centralna banka 73DOSTOP DO STATISTIK O REZERVAH IN KROŽENJU EVROBANKOVCEV..........................................................................................................................73 ..........................................................................................................................73
3.1.5 The European Court of Auditors 81COURT OF AUDITORS CORRECTS FAILURE TO APPLY RULES ON ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS.....................................................................................81 .....................................................................................81
3.1.5 Evropsko računsko sodišče 77RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE POPRAVLJA NEUPORABO PREDPISOV O DOSTOPU DO DOKUMENTOV ................................................................................77
3.1.6 The European Convention 83ACCESS TO EUROPEAN CONVENTION AGENDAS AND MINUTES.....................................................................................................................................83 .....................................................................................................................................83
3.1.6 Evropska konvencij a 79DOSTOP DO DNEVNIH REDOV IN ZAPISNIKOV EVROPSKE KONVENCIJ E .......................................................................................................................79
3.1.7 The European Anti-Fraud Offi ce 89ALLEGED FAILURE TO CARRY OUT PROPER INQUIRY ............................................................................................................................................................89
3.1.7 Evropski urad za boj proti prevaram 85DOMNEVNA NEIZVRŠITEV USTREZNE PREISKAVE .................................................................................................................................................................85
3.2 CASES SETTLED BY THE INSTITUTION 3.2.1 The European Parliament
3.2 PRIMERI, REŠENI S STRANI INSTITUCIJ E 3.2.1 Evropski parlament
ALLEGED FAILURE TO STATE REASONS FOR REJECTION OF TRANSLATION BIDS ........................................................................................................97ACCESS TO EXAMINATION PAPERS IN OPEN COMPETITION.............................................................................................................................................100 .............................................................................................................................................100
DOMNEVNE OPUSTITVE NAVEDBE RAZLOGOV ZA ZAVRNITEV PONUDB ZA IZVAJANJE PREVAJALSKIH STORITEV .....................................91DOSTOP DO TESTOV IZ JAVNEGA IZBIRNEGA POSTOPKA .....................................................................................................................................................94
3.2.2 The European Commission
3.2.2 Evropska komisij a
3.2.4 The European Commission and the Court of Auditors 109COMMISSION AGREES TO MAKE FINAL PAYMENT ................................................................................................................................................................109
3.2.4 Evropska komisij a in Računsko sodišče 103KOMISIJ A SE STRINJA Z IZPLAČILOM KONČNEGA PLAČILA ..............................................................................................................................................103
3.3 FRIENDLY SOLUTIONS ACHIEVED BY THE OMBUDSMAN
3.3 SPORAZUMNE REŠITVE, KI JIH JE DOSEGEL EVROPSKI VARUH
FAILURE TO PAY GRANT DESPITE ORAL ASSURANCES ........................................................................................................................................................115COMMISSION ACCEPTS TO PAY COMPENSATION TO FORMER AUXILIARY AGENT ...................................................................................................120COMMISSION AGREES TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO JOURNALIST AFTER OMBUDSMAN’S PROPOSAL FOR FRIENDLYSOLUTION ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................123
NEPLAČILO PODPORE KLJUB USTNIM ZAGOTOVILOM .......................................................................................................................................................108KOMISIJ A SE STRINJA S PLAČILOM NADOMESTILA NEKDANJI POMOŽNI USLUŽBENKI .........................................................................................112NA PREDLOG EVROPSKEGA VARUHA ZA SPORAZUMNO REŠITEV SE KOMISIJ A STRINJA S POSREDOVANJEM
3.4.1 The European Parliament 129FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH DUTY TO BE COURTEOUS.........................................................................................................................................................129 .........................................................................................................................................................129
INFORMACIJ E NOVINARJU............................................................................................................................................................................................................115 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................115
3.4.2 The Council of the European Union
3.4 PRIMERI, ZAKLJUČENI S KRITIČNO PRIPOMBO EVROPSKEGA VARUHA
ACCESS TO DOCUMENTS ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................134THE COUNCIL’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENSURING THAT THE EUROPEAN UNION POLICE MISSION IN SARAJEVORESPECTS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS .............................................................................................................................................................................................141
3.4.1 Evropski parlament 121NEIZPOLNJEVANJE ZAHTEVE PO VLJUDNEM OBNAŠANJU...............................................................................................................................................121 ...............................................................................................................................................121
Table of Contents
3.4.2 Svet Evropske unij e
3.4.3 The European Commission
3.4.3 Evropska komisij a
INCORRECT INFORMATION IN A TENDER PROCEDURE ......................................................................................................................................................144FUNCTIONING OF THE IST PROGRAMME .................................................................................................................................................................................150ALLEGED FAILURE TO TAKE A DECISION IN AN INFRINGEMENT COMPLAINT (ARTICLE 226 EC) ........................................................................151DISCRIMINATORY CLAUSE IN NOTICE OF COMPETITION ..................................................................................................................................................154INCONSISTENT APPROACH TO STUDY ON SEALS BY COMMISSION ...............................................................................................................................159ALLEGED FAILURE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS REGARDING TENDER SPECIFICATIONS ..............................................................................................165
NAPAČNE INFORMACIJ E V POSTOPKU ZA ODDAJO NAROČILA ......................................................................................................................................134DELOVANJE PROGRAMA IST ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................140DOMNEVNA OPUSTITEV SPREJETJA ODLOČITVE O PRITOŽBI ZARADI KRŠITVE .........................................................................................................140DISKRIMINATORNA KLAVZULA V OBJAVI JAVNEGA RAZPISA ..........................................................................................................................................143NEDOSLEDNO OBRAVNAVANJE ŠTUDIJ E O TJULNJIH S STRANI KOMISIJ E ....................................................................................................................147DOMNEVNA OPUSTITEV ODGOVORA NA VPRAŠANJA O RAZPISNIH POGOJIH..........................................................................................................153 ..........................................................................................................153
3.4.4 The Economic and Social Commi ee 169ALLEGATION THAT COMPLAINANT PROVIDED “FALSE INFORMATION” IN FRAMEWORK OF RECRUITMENT..............................................169 ..............................................169
3.4.4 Ekonomsko-socialni odbor 157TRDITEV, DA JE PRITOŽNIK NAVEDEL “NAPAČNE INFORMACIJE” V OKVIRU ZAPOSLOVANJA............................................................................157 ............................................................................157
3.4.5 The European Anti-Fraud Offi ce 173UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS OF BRIBERY AGAINST JOURNALIST...................................................................................................................................173 ...................................................................................................................................173
3.4.5 Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam 160NEUTEMELJENE TRDITVE O PODKUPOVANJU, USMERJENE PROTI NOVINARJU........................................................................................................160 ........................................................................................................160
3.5 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS ACCEPTED BY THE INSTITUTION 3.5.1 The Council of the European Union
3.5 OSNUTKI PRIPOROČIL, KI SO JIH INSTITUCIJ E SPREJELE 3.5.1 Svet Evropske unij e
COUNCIL GRANTS PARTIAL ACCESS TO ANNUAL REPORT OF CODE OF CONDUCT GROUP .................................................................................175COUNCIL GRANTS ACCESS TO CANDIDATES’ MARKED EXAMINATION PAPERS........................................................................................................176 ........................................................................................................176
SVET ODOBRI DELNI DOSTOP DO LETNEGA POROČILA SKUPINE ZA KODEKS RAVNANJA ....................................................................................162SVET OMOGOČI DOSTOP DO OCENJENIH TESTOV KANDIDATOV...................................................................................................................................163 ...................................................................................................................................163
3.5.2 The European Commission
3.5.2 Evropska komisij a
COMMISSION TO PROMOTE GOOD ADMINISTRATION IN EUROPEAN SCHOOLS .......................................................................................................181DISCRIMINATION ON THE GROUNDS OF NATIONALITY BY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY AND EU COMPETITION LAW.............188 .............188
KOMISIJ A IN PRIZADEVANJA ZA BOLJŠE UPRAVLJANJE V EVROPSKIH ŠOLAH ...........................................................................................................167DISKRIMINACIJ A NA PODLAGI DRŽAVLJANSTVA V TELEKOMUNIKACIJSKEM PODJETJU IN KONKURENČNO PRAVO EU.........................173 .........................173
3.6 CASES CLOSED AFTER A SPECIAL REPORT
3.6 PRIMERI, ZAKLJUČENI PO POSEBNEM POROČILU
3.6.1 The European Parliament 194EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ACCEPTS TO PUBLISH NAMES OF SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES IN RECRUITMENT COMPETITIONS...................194 ...................194
3.6.1 Evropski parlament 179EVROPSKI PARLAMENT SPREJME ODLOČITEV O OBJAVI IMEN USPEŠNIH KANDIDATOV NA IZBIRNIH POSTOPKIH ZA ZAPOSLITEV ...179
3.6.2 The Council of the European Union 195ACCESS TO COUNCIL DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING OPINIONS OF THE LEGAL SERVICE .............................................................................................195
3.6.2 Svet Evropske unij e 179DOSTOP DO DOKUMENTOV SVETA, VKLJUČNO Z MNENJI PRAVNE SLUŽBE...............................................................................................................179 ...............................................................................................................179
3.7 OWN INITIATIVE INQUIRIES BY THE OMBUDSMAN
3.7 PREISKAVE EVROPSKEGA VARUHA NA LASTNO POBUDO
REMEDIES AVAILABLE IN TENDER PROCEDURES ..................................................................................................................................................................201ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION IN A RECRUITMENT COMPETITION – COMPLAINANT FROM ACCESSION STATE .............................................205
RAZPOLOŽLJIVA PRAVNA SREDSTVA V RAZPISNIH POSTOPKIH ZA ODDAJO NAROČIL .........................................................................................185ELEKTRONSKA PRIJAVA V POSTOPKU JAVNEGA RAZPISA ZA ZAPOSLITEV - PRITOŽNIK IZ DRŽAVE PRISTOPNICE......................................189 ......................................189
3.8 QUERY FROM REGIONAL OMBUDSMAN
3.8 POIZVEDBA REGIONALNEGA OMBUDSMANA
COMMUNITY LEGISLATION IN THE FIELD OF REHABILITATION OF PERSONS SUFFERING FROM MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS............................207 ............................207
ZAKONODAJA SKUPNOSTI NA PODROČJU REHABILITACIJE OSEB, KI TRPIJO ZA MULTIPLO SKLEROZO..........................................................191 ..........................................................191
4.1 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
4.1 EVROPSKI PARLAMENT
4.2 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
4.2 EVROPSKA KOMISIJ A
4.4 THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
4.4 SODIŠČE EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI
4.5 THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
4.5 SODIŠČE PRVE STOPNJE EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI
Table of Contents
4.6 RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE
4.7 THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK
4.7 EVROPSKA INVESTICIJSKA BANKA
4.8 THE PUBLICATIONS OFFICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
4.8 URAD ZA URADNE PUBLIKACIJE EVROPSKIH SKUPNOSTI
5.1 RELATIONS WITH NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND LOCAL OMBUDSMEN OF THE EU 219
5.1 ODNOSI Z NACIONALNIMI, REGIONALNIMI IN LOKALNIMI OMBUDSMANIEVROPSKE UNIJ E
5.2 THE LIAISON NETWORK
5.2 MREŽA POVEZOVANJA
5.3 RELATIONS WITH NATIONAL OMBUDSMEN IN THE ACCESSION STATES
5.3 ODNOSI Z OMBUDSMANI V DRŽAVAH PRISTOPNICAH
6.1 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR
6.1 DOGODKI LETA
6.2 CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS
6.2 KONFERENCE IN SREČANJA
6.3 OTHER EVENTS
6.3 DRUGI DOGODKI
6.5 ONLINE COMMUNICATION
6.5 KOMUNICIRANJE PREKO SPLETA
STATISTICS CONCERNING THE WORK OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN IN 2003 263
STATISTIKA O DELU EVROPSKEGA VARUHA V LETU 2003
THE OMBUDSMAN’S BUDGET
PRORAČUN EVROPSKEGA VARUHA
INDICES OF DECISIONS
SEZNAM ODLOČITEV
THE ELECTION OF THE EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN
VOLITVE EVROPSKEGA VARUHA ČLOVEKOVIH PRAVIC
The ninth Annual Report of the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament provides an account of the Ombudsman’s activities in 2003.
Deveto letno poročilo Evropskega varuha (v nadaljevanju: Varuh ali Evropski varuh) Evropskemu parlamentu obravnava delovanje Varuha v letu 2003.
It is the first Annual Report to be presented by P. Nikiforos Diamandouros, whom the European Parliament elected as European Ombudsman on 15 January 2003, following the announcement by the founding European Ombudsman, Jacob Söderman, of his decision to retire.
To je prvo letno poročilo P. Nikiforosa Diamandourosa, ki ga je Parlament izvolil za Evropskega varuha 5. januarja 2003 po tem, ko je ustanovni Evropski varuh Jacob Söderman sporočil, da se namerava upokojiti.
STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT
SESTAVA POROČILA
The report consists of six chapters and fi ve annexes.
Poročilo je sestavljeno iz šestih poglavij in petih prilog.
Chapter 1 is a personal introduction by the Ombudsman in which he pays tribute to his predecessor, reviews the year’s main activities and achievements and explains his objectives.
Prvo poglavje je osebna predstavitev Varuha, kjer izkaže spoštovanje svojemu predhodniku, pregleda glavne dejavnost in dosežke v tem letu in pojasni svoje cilje.
Chapter 2 describes the Ombudsman’s procedures for analysing and conducting inquiries into complaints and gives an overview of the complaints dealt with in 2003.
Drugo poglavje opisuje postopke Varuha za obravnavanje pritožb in vodenje preiskave in podaja pregled obravnavanih pritožb v letu 2003.
Chapter 3, the bulk of the report, consists of a selection of the Ombudsman’s decisions following inquiries.
V tretjem poglavju, osrednjem in najobširnejšem delu poročila, je izbor odločitev Varuha na podlagi preiskav.
The chapter consists mainly of decisions on complaints, organised first by the type of fi finding or outcome and then by the institution or body concerned.
Poglavje je sestavljeno pretežno iz odločitev o pritožbah, ki so najprej urejene po vrsti ugotovitev ali rezultata in nato po pristojni institucij i ali organu.
Decisions following own- initiative inquiries and queries from ombudsmen in the Member States are dealt with separately.
Ločeno pa so obravnavane odločitve na podlagi preiskav in poizvedb, ki so jih na lastno pobudo sprožili ombudsmani v državah članicah.
Chapter 4 concerns relations with other institutions of the European Union, as well as the Ombudsman’s participation as an Observer at the Convention on the future of Europe.
Četrto poglavje se dotika odnosov z drugimi institucijami Evropske unij e in sodelovanja Varuha kot opazovalca v Konvencij i o prihodnosti Evrope.
Chapter 5 deals with the European Ombudsman’s relations with the community of national, regional and local ombudsmen in Europe, in both current and future Member States.
Peto poglavje obravnava odnose Evropskega varuha s skupnostjo nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih ombudsmanov v Evropi, tako v sedanjih kot v prihodnjih državah članicah.
Chapter 6 deals with information and communication activities.
Šesto poglavje obravnava informacijske in komunikacijske dejavnosti.
The chapter is divided into fi ve sections, covering the year’s highlights, conferences and meetings in current and future Member States, other events such as lectures to visitor groups, media relations and online communications.
Poglavje je razdeljeno v pet razdelkov, ki pokrivajo najpomembnejše dogodke leta, konference in srečanja v sedanjih in prihodnjih državah članicah, dogodke, kot so predavanja skupinam obiskovalcev, odnose z mediji in spletno komuniciranje.
Annex A contains statistics on the work of the European Ombudsman in 2003.
Priloga A vsebuje statistiko o delu Evropskega varuha v letu 2003.
Annexes B and C give details of the Ombudsman’s budget and personnel respectively.
Prilogi B in C podajata podrobnosti o proračunu in osebju Evropskega varuha.
Annex D indexes the decisions contained in chapter 3 by case number, by subject ma er and by the type of maladministration alleged.
V prilogi D je seznam odločitev, navedenih v 3. poglavju, ki so razvrščene po številkah posameznih zadev, po njihovi vsebini in po vrsti domnevnih nepravilnosti.
Annex E contains information on the process of electing the Ombudsman.
Priloga E vsebuje informacij e o postopku izvolitve Varuha.
The mission of the European Ombudsman
Poslanstvo Evropskega varuha
The offi ce of European Ombudsman was established by the Maastricht Treaty as part of the citizenship of the European Union.
Evropski varuh je bil ustanovljen z Maastrichtsko pogodbo kot del državljanstva Evropske unije.
The Ombudsman investigates complaints about maladministration in the activities of Community institutions and bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role.
Varuh preiskuje pritožbe o nepravilnostih pri delovanju institucijin organov Skupnosti, razen delovanja Evropskega sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje pri opravljanju njune sodne funkcije.
With the approval of the European Parliament, the Ombudsman has defined “maladministration” in a way that includes respect for human rights, for the rule of law and for principles of good administration.
S soglasjem Evropskega parlamenta je Varuh »nepravilnosti« opredelil tako, da vključujejo spoštovanje človekovih pravic, spoštovanje pravnega reda in načela dobrega upravljanja.
Complaints and inquiries in 2003
Pritožbe in preiskave v letu 2003
The total number of complaints received in 2003 was 2 436, a 10% increase compared to the previous year, due in part to a concerted effort to inform citizens of their rights.
V letu 2003 je Varuh prejel 2.436 pritožb, kar predstavlja 10 odstotno povečanje v primerjavi s prejšnjim letom, delno tudi zaradi večjih prizadevanj pri informiranju državljanov o njihovih pravicah.
Nearly half the complaints were sent to the Ombudsman electronically, either by email or using the complaint form on the Ombudsman’s website.
Skoraj polovica pritožb je bila Varuhu posredovana v elektronski obliki bodisi po elektronski pošti bodisi z uporabo pritožbenega obrazca na varuhovi spletni strani.
In almost 70% of cases, the Ombudsman was able to help the complainant by opening an inquiry into the case, transferring it to a competent body, or giving advice on where to turn for a prompt and effective solution to the problem.
V skoraj 70 odstotkih primerov je Varuh lahko pomagal pritožniku že samo s tem, da je začel s preiskavo, preusmeril zadevo na drug pristojen organ ali svetoval, kam naj se pritožnik obrne za hitro in učinkovito rešitev problema.
A total of 253 new inquiries were opened during the year.
Skupaj je bilo med letom začetih 253 novih preiskav.
The Ombudsman also dealt with a large number of requests for information, of which 2 538 were sent by e-mail.
Varuh se je ukvarjal tudi z velikim številom prošenj za informacije, od katerih je bilo 2.538 poslanih po elektronski pošti.
The results of the Ombudsman’s inquiries
Rezultati preiskav Varuha
The Ombudsman made decisions closing 180 cases following inquiries.
Varuh se je na podlagi preiskav odločil zaključiti 180 primerov.
Chapter 3 of the Annual Report contains a selection of these decisions, illustrating the range of inquiries in terms of subject ma er, type of outcome and the institutions and bodies concerned.
Tretje poglavje letnega poročila vsebuje izbor teh odločitev in prikazuje razpon preiskav glede na vsebino, vrsto ugotovitve ter vpletene institucij e in organe.
For practical reasons, decisions are included in the report only if they contain new findings of law, new material concerning the competence or procedures of the Ombudsman, or findings of fact that are of general importance or interest.
Zaradi praktičnih razlogov so odločitve zajete v poročilu le, če vsebujejo nova odkritja v zakonu, novo gradivo v zvezi s pristojnostmi ali postopki Varuha ali ugotovitev dejstev, ki so splošnega pomena ali interesa.
All the Ombudsman’s decisions, with the exception of a few confidential cases which cannot be satisfactorily anonymised, are published on the Ombudsman’s website (h p://www.euroombudsman.eu.int) in the language of the complainant and in English.
Vse varuhove odločitve, z izjemo nekaj zaupnih primerov, katerih anonimnost ni moč zagotoviti, so objavljene na spletni strani Varuha (h p://www.euroombudsman.eu.int) v jeziku pritožnika in v angleščini.
No maladministration
Brez nepravilnosti
In 87 cases, the Ombudsman’s inquiry revealed no maladministration.
V 87 primerih preiskava Varuha ni pokazala nikakršnih nepravilnosti.