natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
COMMISSION v ITALY the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordination of procedures for the award of public service contracts (OJ 1992 L 209, p.
KOMISIJA PROTI ITALIJI ni izpolnila obveznosti iz Direktive Sveta 92/50/EGS z dne 18. junija 1992 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil storitev (UL L 209, str.
1), Council Directive 93/36/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award of public supply contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p.
1), Direktive Sveta 93/36/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993 o usklajevanju postopkov oddaje javnih naročil blaga (UL L 199, str.
1), Council Directive 93/37/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p.
1), Direktive Sveta 93/37/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil za gradnje (UL L 199, str.
54) as amended by European Parliament and Council Directive 97/52/EC of 13 October 1997 (OJ 1997 L 328, p.
54), kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 97/52/ES z dne 13. oktobra 1997 (UL L 328, str.
1) (‘Directive 93/37’), Council Directive 93/38/EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (OJ 1993 L 199, p.
1, v nadaljevanju: Direktiva 93/37), Direktive Sveta 93/38/EGS z dne 14. junija 1993 o usklajevanju postopkov naročanja naročnikov v vodnem, energetskem, transportnem in telekomunikacijskem sektorju (UL L 199, str.
84), and Articles 43 EC and 49 EC and the principles of transparency and equal treatment which are the corollary to them.
84) in iz členov 43 ES in 49 ES ter načel preglednosti in enakega obravnavanja, ki iz teh členov izhajata.
Directives 92/50, 93/36, 93/37 and 93/38 were adopted in pursuance of the establishment of the internal market, defined as an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured.
Direktive 92/50, 93/36, 93/37 in 93/38 so bile sprejete v okviru vzpostavitve notranjega trga, opredeljenega kot območje brez notranjih meja, v katerem je zagotovljen prosti pretok blaga, oseb, storitev in kapitala.
The directives sought to eliminate practices that restrict competition in general and participation in public contracts by other Member States’ nationals, in order to implement inter alia the freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services enshrined in Articles 43 EC and 49 EC respectively.
Njihov namen je ukinitev postopkov, ki omejujejo konkurenco nasploh in zlasti sodelovanje pripadnikov drugih držav članic pri javnih naročilih, predvsem za izvedbo pravice do ustanavljanja in svobode opravljanja storitev, določenih v členih 43 ES in 49 ES.
The 16th recital in the preamble to Directive 92/50 states that public service contracts may from time to time include some works, and that it results from Council Directive 71/305/EEC of 26 July 1971 concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts (OJ, English Special Edition 1971 (II), p.
V skladu s �estnajsto uvodno izjavo Direktive 92/50 je mogoče, da javna naročila storitev občasno vključujejo tudi nekatere gradnje, in iz Direktive Sveta 71/305/EGS z dne 26. julija 1971 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj (UL L 185, str.
682) that, for a contract to be a public works contract, its object must be the achievement of a work. In so far as those works are ancillary rather than the object of the contract, they do not justify treating the contract as a public works contract.
5) izhaja, da mora biti cilj javnega naročila, če naj bo opredeljeno kot javno naročilo gradenj, izpolnitev neke gradnje, ker če so te gradnje naključne in niso predmet javnega naročila, ne omogočajo upravičene obravnave tega naročila kot javnega naročila gradenj.
It is clear from Article 8 of Directive 92/50 that public contracts which have as their object services listed in Annex I A to that directive are to be awarded in accordance with the provisions of Titles III to VI thereof.
Iz člena 8 Direktive 92/50 izhaja, da se naročila, katerih predmet so storitve, na�tete v prilogi I A k tej direktivi, oddajajo v skladu z določbami iz njenih naslovov od III do VI.
Title III concerns the choice of award procedures and rules governing design contests.
Naslov III je namenjen izbiri postopkov oddaje navedenih naročil in določbam o natečajih.
Category No 12 of Annex I A to Directive 92/50 mentions, inter alia, architectural services; engineering services; urban planning and landscape architectural services; related scientific and technical consulting services; and technical testing and analysis services.
Predvsem v razredu 12 priloge I A k Direktivi 92/50 so navedene storitve s področja arhitekture, storitve s področja inženiringa, storitve s področja urbanega planiranja in krajinske arhitekture, sorodne znanstvene in tehnične svetovalne storitve, storitve s področja tehničnega testiranja in analiz.
According to Article 15 of Directive 93/38, contracts which have as their object services listed in Annex XVI A thereto are to be awarded in accordance with the provisions of Titles III, IV and V. Title IV concerns procedures for the award of contracts.
V skladu s členom 15 Direktive 93/38 se javna naročila, katerih predmet so storitve, na�tete v prilogi XVI A k tej direktivi, oddajo v skladu s predpisi njenih iz naslovov od III do V. Naslov IV navedene direktive je namenjen postopkom oddaje naročil.
Category No 12 of Annex XVI A is identical to Category No 12 in Annex I A to Directive 92/50.
Razred 12 priloge XVI A je enak razredu 12 priloge I A k Direktivi 92/50.
Under Article 1(a) of Directive 93/37, ‘“public works contracts” are contracts for pecuniary interest concluded in writing between a contractor and a contracting authority as defined in [Article 1(b)], which have as their object either the execution, or both the execution and design, of works related to one of the activities referred to in Annex II or a work defined in [Article 1(c)], or the execution, by whatever means, of a work corresponding to the requirements specified by the contracting authority’.
V skladu s členom 1(a) Direktive 93/37 so „‚javna naročila gradenj‘ za plačilo pisno sklenjene pogodbe med izvajalcem in naročnikom, kakor je opredeljen v (b) tega člena, katerih predmet je izvedba, ali oboje – izvedba in projektiranje gradenj, povezanih z eno od dejavnosti iz Priloge II, ali gradnja, opredeljena v (c) navedenega člena ali izvedba neke gradnje, ne glede na način, ki ustreza zahtevam naročnika“.
Article 6(1) of Directive 93/37 sets out its scope with regard to the estimated value of the various public works contracts covered.
Člen 6(1) navedene direktive pojasnjuje njeno področje uporabe glede na ocenjeno vrednost posameznih zadevnih javnih naročil gradenj.
It is clear from Article 6(3) that where a work is subdivided into several lots, each one the subject of a contract, the value of each lot must be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the amount referred to in Article 6(1) and, where the aggregate value of the lots is not less than that amount, the provisions of Article 6(1) are to apply in principle to all lots.
Iz odstavka 3 istega člena izhaja, da če je gradnja nadalje razdeljena na več sklopov in je vsak sklop predmet naročila, je treba upo�tevati vrednost vsakega sklopa pri izračunu zneskov iz odstavka 1 navedenega člena, in da se, če skupna vrednost sklopov ni manj�a od navedenega zneska, določbe tega odstavka načeloma uporabljajo za vse sklope.
2008 — CASE C-412/04 restoration, restructuring, refurbishment and maintenance of works and installations.
2008 – ZADEVA C-412/04 področje uporabe zakona �t.
Article 2(1) extends the scope of Law No 109/1994 to mixed works, supply and service contracts and to supply or service contracts which include ancillary works the estimated value of which exceeds 50% of the total value of the relevant contract.
109/1994 �iri na me�ana naročila gradenj, blaga in storitev ter na naročila blaga ali storitev, ki vključujejo dodatna dela, ocenjena na več kot 50 % cene zadevnega naročila.
Article 2(5) states that if the value of the works, assessed individually, exceeds the Community threshold the contract must be awarded by the private person in accordance with the procedures prescribed by Directive 93/37.
Ta določba pojasnjuje, da če je vrednost, gledano individualno, vi�ja od praga Skupnosti, so posamezniki zavezani, da naročila dodelijo v skladu z Direktivo 93/37.
In addition to public works contracts, Law No 109/1994 regulates certain public service contracts.
Poleg javnih naročil gradenj zakon �t. 109/1994 ureja določena javna naročila storitev.
Thus, Article 17(12) of Law No 109/1994 authorises the awarding entities to award public service contracts for the design and supervision of works the estimated value of which is less than EUR 100 000, through the person responsible for the procedure, to persons referred to in Article 17(1)(d) to (g) who are trusted by the awarding entities, after verifying the professional experience and professional capacity of the persons selected and stating reasons for that choice.
Tako člen 17(12) tega zakona naročnikom dovoljuje, da naročila storitev projekti -ranja in vodenja gradnje, katerih ocenjena vrednost je nižja od 100.000 EUR, s posredovanjem vodje postopka dodelijo subjektom iz odstavka 1, točke od (d) do (g), navedenega člena 17, ki so pridobili njihovo zaupanje na podlagi preverjanja izku�enj in poklicne usposobljenosti izbranih subjektov, ter utemeljijo to odločitev.
Under Article 27(2) of Law No 109/1994, if the contracting authorities cannot assume responsibility for the supervision of the works, they must entrust the supervision, in the following order, to other public authorities, to the project designer for the purposes of Article 17(4) of the Law, or to other persons selected pursuant to the procedures prescribed by national legislation transposing the relevant Community provisions.
Če naročniki ne morejo prevzeti vodenja gradnje, v skladu s členom 27(2) zakona �t. 109/94 to nalogo zaupajo po vrsti: drugim javnim organom, projektantu, zadolženemu za projekt v smislu člena 17(4) navedenega zakona, ali drugim subjektom, izbranim v skladu s postopki, določenimi z nacionalnimi predpisi, ki prena�ajo določbe Skupnosti s tega področja.
Under Article 28(4) of Law No 109/1994, testing is to be entrusted to one, two or three highly qualified technicians expert in the particular field concerned, by reference to the type, complexity and value of the works.
Na podlagi člena 28(4) zakona �t. 109/1994 se naloge nadzora zaupajo enemu, dvema ali trem visoko kvalificiranim tehnikom na posameznem področju glede na vrsto, zahtevnost in vrednost gradnje.
The technicians are to be selected by the contracting authorities from their own organisations unless a lack of staff is established and certified by the person responsible for the procedure.
Navedene tehnike imenujejo naročniki izmed svojih kadrov, razen če vodja postopka ugotovi in potrdi pomanjkanje osebja.
Article 30(6a) of Law No 109/1994 offers the same possibility as regards inspection which is generally entrusted to the technical departments of the awarding entities or to the supervisory bodies referred to in Article 30(6a)(a).
Člen 30(6a) navedenega zakona dopu�ča enako možnost, ko gre za naloge nadziranja, ki se načeloma dodelijo tehničnim oddelkom naročnikov ali nadzornim organom iz točke (a) istega odstavka.
Furthermore, it is apparent from Article 188(1), (3), (8), (9), (11), (12) and (13) of DPR No 554/1999 that within 30 days from the completion of the works, or from the date of handing over of the works where testing is on-going, the awarding entity is to entrust the inspection of the works to its staff, by reference to the type, category, complexity and value of the works and on the basis of pre-established criteria.
Iz odstavkov 1, 3, 8, 9, 11, 12 in 13 člena 188 UPR �t. 554/1999 poleg tega izhaja, da naročnik v tridesetih dneh od konca gradnje ali od predvidenega konca v primeru preverjanj med izvedbo zaupa naloge nadziranja svojim sodelavcem glede na vrsto, kategorijo, zahtevnost in vrednost del ter na podlagi predhodno določenih meril.
If the staff do not meet the requirements stipulated, external specialists included in lists drawn up by the Ministry of Public Works and by the regions and autonomous provinces are to be called upon.
Če to osebje ne izpolnjuje zahtevanih pogojev, se uporabijo zunanji strokovnjaki, navedeni na seznamih ministrstva za javna dela, dežel in avtonomnih pokrajin.
In the absence of such lists, the awarding entities may, in their discretion, award the inspection of works to persons who possess, in any event, the requisite qualifications and satisfy the requisite conditions.
Če seznam ne obstaja, lahko naročnik na podlagi diskrecijske pravice naloge nadziranja dodeli osebi, ki ima, v vsakem primeru, zahtevane lastnosti in izpolnjuje predvidene pogoje.
Articles 37a to 37c of Law No 109/1994 govern the award of contracts for public works financed wholly or partly by private persons.
Členi 37a, 37b in 37c zakona �t. 109/1994 obravnavajo dodelitev javnih naročil gradenj, ki jih v celoti ali deloma financirajo zasebniki.
Article 37a permits private persons to submit proposals for public works or works in the public interest to the awarding entities and to conclude the corresponding contracts providing for the financing and management of those works.
Člen 37a zasebnikom dovoljuje, da naročnikom predložijo predloge za izvedbo javnih gradenj ali gradenj v javnem interesu ter podpi�ejo ustrezne pogodbe, ki določajo financiranje in vodenje gradnje.
Article 37b sets out the procedure for selecting the promoter.
Člen 37b istega zakona opisuje postopek izbire promotorja.
It provides that the contracting authorities are to evaluate the feasibility of the proposals submitted having regard to various aspects: construction, town planning, environment, quality
Tako določa, da naročniki ocenijo izvedljivost predstavljenih predlogov z različnih vidikov: gradnja, urba-
COMMISSION v ITALY of the design, functionality, the use to which the works will be put, public access, the return, management and maintenance costs, the duration of the concession, timelimits for carrying out the works, the applicable charges and the method for updating them, the economic value of the plans, and the content of the draft agreement.
KOMISIJA PROTI ITALIJI nizem, okolje, kakovost projekta, funkcionalnost, namembnost dela, dostopnost javnosti, donosnost, stro�ki upravljanja in vzdrževanja, trajanje koncesije, roki koncesije za izvedbo del, veljavne takse in način revizije, ekonomska in finančna vrednost načrta in vsebina osnutka pogodbe.
The contracting authorities must establish that no factors exist which would preclude the proposals from being carried out and, after examining and comparing the latter and hearing representations from any promoters who so request, they are to indicate whether a proposal is in the public interest.
Naročnik se mora prepričati, da nič ne preprečuje izvedbe teh predlogov, in po preučitvi in primerjavi slednjih ter po zasli�anju promotorjev, ki jih predlagajo, pove, kateri predlog je v javnem interesu.
In that case, under Article 37c of Law No 109/1994, a restricted procedure is opened in order to obtain two further offers.
V tem primeru se v skladu s členom 37c zakona �t. 109/1994 izvede omejeni postopek, namenjen predstavitvi �e dveh ponudb.
The concession is then awarded under a negotiated procedure in which the proposal of the promoter initially selected and the other offers are examined.
Koncesija se nato dodeli s postopkom s pogajanji, med katerim se preučijo promotorjev predlog, ki je bil sprva izbran, ter ti drugi ponudbi.
During the course of the procedure, the promoter may adapt his proposal to the offer considered by the contracting authority to be the most suitable.
Med tem postopkom lahko promotor svoj predlog prilagodi spremembam, ki jih naročnik oceni kot najbolj�e.
If he does so he will be awarded the concession.
V tem primeru se mu podeli koncesija.
Prelitigation procedure
Predhodni postopek
Having received complaints about the effects of Law No 109/1994 in its original version, the Commission monitored the procedure for the adoption of the draft law intended to amend it.
Komisija je po prejemu pritožb glede učinkov zakona �t. 109/1994 v prvotni različici sledila postopku sprejema osnutka zakona, katerega namen je bil sprememba tega zakona.
By letter of 26 June 2003, the Italian Republic agreed with most of the objections put forward by the Commission and informed it of its consequent intention to amend the legislation in force.
Z dopisom z dne 26. junija 2003 se je Italijanska republika strinjala z večino očitkov Komisije in ji sporočila, da bo ustrezno spremenila veljavno zakonodajo.
However, as the Italian Republic failed to make the amendments indicated, on 15 October 2003 the Commission sent the Italian Republic a reasoned opinion calling on it to take the measures necessary to comply with that opinion within two months of its notification.
Ker pa Italijanska republika ni izvedla teh sprememb, ji je Komisija 15. oktobra 2003 poslala obrazloženo mnenje in jo pozvala, naj sprejme navedene ukrepe, da se uskladi s tem mnenjem v roku dveh mesecev od njegove vročitve.
Taking the view that the position adopted by the Italian Republic in a letter of 22 April 2004 was unsatisfactory, the Commission brought the present proceedings pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 226 EC.
Ker je Komisija menila, da stali�če italijanske vlade, podano v dopisu z dne 22. aprila 2004, ni zadovoljivo, je na podlagi člena 226, drugi odstavek, ES, vložila to tožbo.
By order of the President of the Court of 6 April 2005, the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Finland were granted leave to intervene in support of the form of order sought by the Italian Republic.
S sklepom predsednika Sodi�ča z dne 6. aprila 2005 je bila Francoski republiki, Kraljevini Nizozemski in Republiki Finski dovoljena intervencija v tej zadevi v podporo predlogom Italijanske republike.
Only the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Finland submitted statements in intervention.
Le Kraljevina Nizozemska in Republika Finska sta predložili intervencijski vlogi.
This action is based on six complaints.
Ta tožba temelji na �estih očitkih.
The first complaint
Prvi očitek
The first complaint concerns the rules on mixed contracts as set out in Law No 109/1994.
Prvi očitek se nana�a na ureditev me�anih naročil, kot ta izhaja iz zakona �t. 109/1994.
It is clear from Article 2(1) of Law No 109/1994, which is intended to define the notion of public works, that the Law covers the construction, demolition, restoration, restructuring, refurbishment and maintenance of works and installations where they are awarded by the persons referred to in Article 2(2).
Iz določb člena 2(1) tega zakona, katerega namen je opredelitev obsega pojma javnih gradenj, izhaja, da ta ureja gradnjo, ru�enje, obnavljanje, preurejanje, prenavljanje in vzdrževanje storitev in prostorov, če jih podelijo subjekti, navedeni v odstavku 2 istega člena.
Article 2(1) states that mixed works, supply and services contracts and supply or service contracts which include ancillary works, are subject to the provisions of Law No 109/1994 if the works represent more than 50% of the total value of the relevant contract.
Navedeni odstavek 1 pojasnjuje, da se za me�ana naročila gradenj, blaga in storitev ter za naročila blaga ali storitev, ki vključujejo dodatna dela, uporablja zakon �t. 109/1994, če ta dela predstavljajo več kot 50 % cene zadevnega naročila.
The Commission submits that the legal rules applicable to mixed contracts must depend on the main purpose of the contract as determined inter alia, but not exclusively, by the value of the various matters covered by the contract.
Komisija trdi, da mora biti pravna ureditev, ki se uporablja za me�ana naročila, odvisna od glavnega predmeta naročila, ki ga poleg drugih dejavnikov in ne izključno opredeljuje vrednost posameznih storitev.
In that connection, the Commission claims that, by making those contracts in which the works are the most important element from an economic point of view but are nevertheless incidental to the other matters covered by the contract subject to the rules on public works contracts, the Italian legislation has the effect of removing many service and supply contracts the estimated value of which exceeds the thresholds for the application of Directives 92/50 and 93/36 but which is less than that for Directive 93/37 from the application of the relevant Community legislation.
V zvezi s tem Komisija navaja, da se na podlagi italijanske zakonodaje – ki določila, ki veljajo za javna naročila gradenj, uporablja za naročila, pri katerih je gradnja z gospodarskega vidika najpomembnej�i del, pri čemer pa ima glede na druge storitve dopolnilen značaj – večina naročil storitev in blaga, katerih ocenjena vrednost je vi�ja od pragov iz direktiv 92/50 in 93/36, vendar nižja od pragov iz Direktive 93/37, izmakne uporabi ustrezne ureditve Skupnosti.
The Italian Republic replies that pending the amendment of the national legislation concerned, undertaken in response to the Commission’s objections, the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport adopted Circular No 2316 of 18 December 2003 laying down rules for mixed public works, supply and service contracts (disciplina dei contratti misti negli appalti pubblici di lavori, forniture e servizi) (GURI No 79 of 3 April 2004, p.
Italijanska republika ugovarja, da je v pričakovanju sprememb zadevnih nacionalnih zakonov, ki jih je izvedla kot odgovor na očitke Komisije, sprejela okrožnico �t. 2316 ministrstva za infrastrukturo in promet o ureditvi me�anih pogodb pri javnih naročilih gradenj, blaga in storitev (disciplina dei contratti misti negli appalti pubblici di lavori, forniture e servizi) z dne 18. decembra 2003 (GURI �t.
26), by which the contracting authorities were called on to comply with the principle that, when dealing with a mixed contract, its main purpose must be taken into account in determining the applicable legislation, so that the economic aspect would no longer be predominant in that respect.
79 z dne 3. aprila 2004, str. 26), s katero so bili naročniki pozvani k spo�tovanju načela, v skladu s katerim je treba, ko gre za me�ano naročilo, za določitev veljavne zakonodaje upo�tevati glavni predmet pogodbe, in sicer da gospodarski vidik ne bi bil več prevladujoče merilo glede tega.
The Republic of Finland takes the view that the economic value is a decisive factor in determining the main purpose of the contract, and such an approach should be
Republika Finska meni, da je gospodarska vrednost odločilno merilo pri presoji glavnega predmeta naročila, tak pristop pa naj bi bilo mogoče izključiti le v izje-
COMMISSION v ITALY excluded only in exceptional circumstances, namely where use of the criterion of economic value is intended to prevent the application of Community law.
KOMISIJA PROTI ITALIJI mnih primerih, in sicer kadar je namen sklicevanja na merilo gospodarske vrednosti oviranje uporabe prava Skupnosti.
The adoption of laws, regulations or administrative provisions after the date on which that period expired cannot be taken into account.
Glede tega ni mogoče upo�tevati sprejetja zakonskih in drugih predpisov po datumu izteka navedenega roka, ki ga je določila Komisija v obrazloženem mnenju.