natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
States, such treaties do not exist. at is why Commissioner Barnier, who comes from a border region himself (Savoie in France), proposed in the 3rd Report on economic and social cohesion of 2004 a new legal instrument in the form of a European cooperation structure. e draft Regulation then formed part of the legislative package for the 2007-2013 programming period for the renewed Cohesion Policy.
prihaja iz obmejne regije (Savoie v Franciji), v tretjem Poročilu o ekonomski in socialni koheziji leta 2004 predlagal nov pravni instrument v obliki strukture evropskega sodelovanja. Osnutek uredbe je bil potem del zakonodajnega paketa za obnovljeno kohezijsko politiko za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
Q.: What is the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation?
V.: Kaj je evropsko združenje za teritorialno sodelovanje?
A.: is is indeed difficult to understand when you accept the basic principle of Community law: If a municipality in a Member State can set up a joint body with a neighbouring municipality inside the same Member State to run a bus line or a water sewage treatment plant or if a region can manage a nature park or a regional development agency together with its neighbour region inside the same Member State, the Community Regulation allows them to do the same thing across the border, inside the Community. ere is an aspect of non-discrimination in it.
O.: To je dejansko težko razumeti, ko sprejmeš temeljno načelo prava Skupnosti. Če lahko občina v državi članici ustanovi skupno telo s sosednjo občino v isti državi članici, da odpre avtobusno progo ali napravo za čiščenje odplak, in če lahko regija upravlja naravni park ali agencijo za regionalni razvoj skupaj s sosednjo regijo v isti državi članici, jima uredba Skupnosti omogoča, da naredita enako na čezmejni ravni, v Skupnosti, v kateri obstaja vidik nediskriminacije.
Unfortunately some central authorities still consider cooperation across the border as external cooperation whereas it is really about internal cooperation inside the Community or, if you prefer, within the Single Market.
Na žalost nekateri osrednji organi še vedno štejejo čezmejno sodelovanje za zunanje sodelovanje, medtem ko gre pri njem dejansko za notranje sodelovanje v Skupnosti ali, če hočete, na enotnem trgu.
A.: e EGTC is a new legal instrument under Community law, not under international law like the Madrid Framework Convention.
O.: EZTS je nov pravni instrument v okviru prava Skupnosti in ne mednarodnega prava, kot je madridska okvirna konvencija.
As with any other Regulation it does not need ratification or negotiation in bi-/multilateral treaties, but is binding and directly applicable in all Member States. us, the Regulation itself enables regional and local authorities from different Member States, as well as certain bodies governed by public law or associations of all these authorities, to set up joint groupings with a legal personality to implement cooperation programmes and projects.
Tako kot drugih uredb ga ni treba ratificirati ali se pogajati o njem v dvo- ali večstranskih pogodbah, ampak je zavezujoč in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah. Uredba omogoča regionalnim in lokalnim organom iz različnih držav članic ter nekaterim subjektom, organiziranim na podlagi javnega prava, ali združenjem vseh teh organov, da za izvajanje programov in projektov sodelovanja ustanovijo skupna združenja, ki so pravne osebe.
Regions as partners The European Territorial Cooperation Objective an EGTC just because these national rules have not yet been adopted. is is quite different from a Directive.
Cilj evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja
Q.: Does the Regulation as finally adopted unanimously reflect that somewhat cautious attitude of the Member States?
V.: Če si to ogledamo na bolj praktični ravni – za kakšno vrsto sodelovanja je mogoče uporabiti EZTS?
A.: We can distinguish four types of cooperation listed in the Regulation: (1) to implement territorial cooperation programmes or (2) projects co-financed by the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund; (3) to carry out other specific actions of territorial cooperation with or (4) without Community co-financing.
O.: Razlikujemo lahko štiri vrste sodelovanja, navedene v uredbi: (1) za izvajanje programov teritorialnega sodelovanja ali (2) projektov, sofinanciranih iz strukturnih skladov in Kohezijskega sklada; (3) za izvajanje drugih posebnih ukrepov teritorialnega sodelovanja s sofinanciranjem Skupnosti ali (4)brez njega.
“Territorial” covers all kinds of cooperation: crossborder, transnational or interregional.
„Teritorialno“ obsega vse vrste sodelovanja: čezmejno, transnacionalno in medregionalno.
To carry out these tasks, an EGTC may set up its own structure, have assets and hire staff.
EZTS lahko, da bo opravil te naloge, vzpostavi svojo strukturo in zaposli osebje, ker ima sredstva.
Q.: Can you give some examples?
V.: Lahko navedete nekaj primerov?
Just to explain the two most controversial points: the Commission’s original proposal did not foresee that the Member States themselves could become a member of an EGTC; neither was there to be any ex-ante control procedure by the central authorities.
Samo da pojasnim dve najbolj sporni točki: prvoten predlog Komisije ni predvideval, da bi lahko države članice same postale članice EZTS; prav tako ni predvidel nobenega postopka predhodnega nadzora, ki naj bi ga izvajali osrednji organi.
On the first point, we discovered that it was necessary to take the central authorities on board, as competencies are very asymmetric between Member States.
V zvezi s prvo točko smo ugotovili, da je treba vključiti osrednje organe, saj so pristojnosti med državami članicami zelo nesorazmerne.
In order to match some Länder competences in Germany, you need the central level in France, the regional authorities in France not having the same competencies. is factor is even more valid for smaller Member States without a regional level, where these competences have to be assumed by the national level.
Da bi uskladili nekatere pristojnosti dežel v Nemčiji, potrebujete osrednjo raven v Franciji, saj regionalni organi v Franciji nimajo enakih pristojnosti. Ta dejavnik toliko bolj velja za manjše države članice brez regionalne ravni, kjer je treba te pristojnosti izvajati na nacionalni ravni.
On the other controversial point, it became obvious that the whole Regulation could only be adopted when the Member States got the power to exercise ex-ante control.
V zvezi z drugo sporno točko je postalo jasno, da bo mogoče celotno uredbo sprejeti le, ko bodo države članice postale pristojne za izvajanje predhodnega nadzora.
However, it should be borne in mind, that the right to establish an EGTC, granted directly by the Regulation to the regional and local authorities, means that the Member States must allow the participation in an EGTC, unless certain conditions are not fulfilled.
Upoštevati je treba, da pravica do ustanovitve EZTS, ki jo Uredba neposredno dodeljuje regionalnim in lokalnim organom, pomeni, da morajo države članice dovoliti sodelovanje v EZTS, razen če niso izpolnjeni nekateri pogoji.
Article 4 of the Regulation does not say that the Member States may allow participation if certain conditions are fulfilled.
Člen 4 te uredbe ne dovoljuje državam članicam sodelovati, če izpolnjujejo le nekatere zahteve.
Here the Commission will pay close attention to ensure that the Regulation is implemented correctly and effectively. ectively.
V zvezi s tem bo Komisija posvetila veliko pozornosti zagotavljanju, da se Uredba izvaja pravilno in učinkovito.
Q.: On this latter aspect of the implementation of the Regulation: people talk about national transposition rules before the Regulation really applies.
V.: Glede tega zadnjega vidika izvajanja uredbe: ljudje govorijo o nacionalnih predpisih o prenosu, preden se začne uredba dejansko uporabljati.
Is the Regulation not really a Directive?
Ali ni uredba v resnici direktiva?
For the first type, some programmes under the new European Territorial Cooperation objective will be managed by an EGTC, acting as managing authority of the programme (e.g. “Grande Région” around Luxembourg, with partner regions in Belgium, France and Germany).
O.: Za prvo vrsto sodelovanja bo nekaj programov v okviru cilja evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja upravljal EZTS, ki bo deloval kot organ upravljanja programa (npr. širše regije okoli Luksemburga, s partnerskimi regijami v Belgiji, Franciji in Nemčiji).
A key advantage here will be that the EGTC, with its own legal personality, will sign the contracts with the lead beneficiary, regardless of where this lead partner is established.
Glavna prednost pri tem bo, da bo EZTS kot pravna oseba podpisal pogodbe z glavnim upravičencem, ne glede na to, kje bo ta glavni partner imel sedež.
Cooperation projects (type 2) could cover the running of a crossborder transport or health service under a Cooperation objective programme or under two “national” Convergence programmes.
Projekti sodelovanja (vrsta 2) bi lahko obsegali vodenje čezmejnega prometa ali zdravstvene službe v okviru programa za uresničitev sodelovanja ali v okviru dveh „nacionalnih“ konvergenčnih programov.
Other Community programmes such as the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development or the CIP (Competiveness and Innovation Framework Programme) may co-finance cooperation projects presented by entities from two Member States (type 3).
Drugi programi Skupnosti, kot je sedmi okvirni program za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj ali CIP (okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost), lahko sofinancirajo projekte sodelovanja, ki jih predstavijo subjekti iz dveh držav članic (vrsta 3).
Finally the fourth type could cover concrete projects without (or after) Community funding or more “governance”-like platforms to give a permanent and legal structure to a Euroregion covering a certain crossborder or transnational area.
In na koncu, četrta vrsta bi lahko obsegala konkretne projekte brez (ali s poznejšim financiranjem) financiranja Skupnosti ali platforme, bolj podobne „upravljanju“, ki bi omogočile stalno in pravno strukturo evroregiji, ki zajema določeno čezmejno ali transnacionalno območje.
Q.: And finally, could you say something about how to set up an EGTC?
V.: In na koncu prosim še za pojasnilo o tem, kako ustanoviti EZTS.
A.: During the OPEN DAYS in October 2007 several seminars were specifically dedicated to the EGTC.
O.: Med prireditvijo ODPRTI DNEVI (OPEN DAYS) oktobra 2007 je bilo več seminarjev posebej za EZTS.
In fact, it so happened that many more people from regional and national authorities inside and outside the Community wanted to participate than the space available allowed.
Pravzaprav se jih je želelo udeležiti več ljudi iz regionalnih in nacionalnih organov v Skupnosti in zunaj nje, kot je dopuščal prostor.
Many of these are waiting to establish joint EGTCs!
Veliko jih čaka, da bodo lahko ustanovili skupne EZTS!
Yes, some national representatives tried to explain why they had not informed the Commission about the national provisions (by the 1 August 2007 deadline) to ensure the effectiveness of the Regulation by arguing that the Regulation was a “disguised” Directive.
Da, nekaj nacionalnih predstavnikov je poskusilo pojasniti, zakaj niso obvestili Komisije o nacionalnih določbah (do 1. avgusta 2007) za zagotovitev učinkovitosti uredbe, in pri tem trdilo, da je uredba „prikrita“ direktiva.
In actual fact, the EGTC Regulation is in line with other Regulations setting up a legal entity under Community law, explicitly asking Member States to adopt national implementation rules such as the European Grouping of Economic Interest, the European Society and the European Corporation.
Uredba EZTS je dejansko skladna z drugimi uredbami o ustanovitvi pravne osebe po pravu Skupnosti, kot so evropsko gospodarsko interesno združenje, evropska družba in evropska gospodarska družba, ter izrecno zahteva, da države članice sprejmejo nacionalne izvedbene predpise.
Even “normal” Regulations such as the general Regulation on the Structural Funds2require, in some Member States, a parliamentary act in order to fix the respective tasks of the central and regional levels.
Celo „navadne“ uredbe, kot je splošna uredba o strukturnih skladih(2), od nekaterih držav članic zahtevajo, da imajo parlamentarni akt, da se določijo zadevne naloge centralne in regionalnih ravni.
It is clear that the Commission will ensure that all Member States adopt these national rules.
Jasno je, da bo Komisija zagotovila vsem državam članicam, da bodo sprejele te nacionalne predpise.
However, without such rules and since 1 August 2007, Member States cannot deny the right granted directly by the Regulation to their regions to set up
Tudi brez teh predpisov in od 1. avgusta 2007 naprej pa države članice regijam ne morejo odreči pravice, neposredno dodeljene z uredbo, ustanoviti EZTS, samo zato, ker ti nacionalni predpisi še niso bili sprejeti.
I would like to end by paraphrasing this year’s motto of the OPEN DAYS: e EGTC: “Making it happen!”
To je precej drugače kot pri direktivi.
_BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ N
_BAR_ STR 10 _BAR_ inforegio _BAR_ panorama _BAR_ Št. 24 _BAR_
“From INTERREG IIIC to INTERREG IVC – the next step towards the Lisbon and Gothenburg objectives”
„Od programa INTERREG IIIC do programa INTERREG IVC – naslednji korak k lizbonskim in göteborškim ciljem“
Michel Lamblin, Director of the INTERREG IVC Programme regions – with the right help – can do so much to contribute to the Lisbon and Gothenburg objectives.
Michel Lamblin, direktor programa INTERREG IVC pomembno, saj lahko regije – s pravo pomočjo – veliko prispevajo k lizbonskim in göteborškim ciljem.
So-called after the European Councils held in those cities in 2000 and 2001 respectively, Lisbon and Gothenburg comprise a broad strategy to increase the competitiveness of the EU and achieve sustainable growth.
Lizbonski in göteborški cilji, ki so ime dobili po Evropskih svetih, ki so potekali v obeh mestih leta 2000 in 2001, obsegajo široko strategijo za povečanje konkurenčnosti EU in doseganje trajnostne rasti.
Focusing on economic (Lisbon) and environmental (Gothenburg) axes, the regions have been identified as key partners in helping to achieve these objectives.
Strategija je usmerjena h gospodarski (lizbonski) in okoljski (göteborški) osi, regije pa so bile opredeljene kot glavne partnerice, ki bodo pomagale doseči te cilje.
Adopted by the European Commission in September 2007, the new interregional cooperation programme (abbreviated to “Interreg IVC”) will receive funding of €321 million from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for the period 2007-13 and covers all 27 Member States as well as Norway and Switzerland, who provide their own funding. e aim of the programme is to provide a framework for the exchange of experiences between regional and local institutions from the different countries on common challenges in areas such as globalisation, demographic change, energy supply and climate change.
Novi program medregionalnega sodelovanja (skrajšano ime „Interreg IVC“), ki ga je septembra 2007 sprejela Evropska komisija, bo iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) prejel finančna sredstva v višini 321 milijonov EUR za obdobje 2007–2013 in zajema vseh sedemindvajset držav članic ter Norveško in Švico, ki zagotavljata svoja finančna sredstva. Cilj programa je zagotoviti okvir za izmenjavo izkušenj med regionalnimi in lokalnimi ustanovami iz različnih držav glede skupnih izzivov, ki jih spodbujajo globalizacija, demografske spremembe, oskrba z energijo in podnebne spremembe.
Future operations will therefore focus on two priorities: the Innovation and Knowledge Economy, and Environment and Risk Prevention.
Ti projekti vključujejo več kot 2.600 partnerjev v 263 različnih dejavnostih, v njih pa sodelujejo regije iz vseh držav članic EU.
Nine sub-themes have been identified under these two priorities, with around 55% of the €321 million budget allocated to priority 1 (economic) themes, and 39% to priority 2 (environmental) themes, while 6% of the budget has been allocated to technical assistance for the programmes.
Skoraj polovica teh dejavnosti zadeva vprašanja gospodarskega razvoja, ustvarjanja delovnih mest, podjetništva, informacijske družbe in tehnoloških inovacij.
Currently, about 75% of INTERREG IIIC operations address these priorities.
Doseženi so bili pomembni rezultati, in sicer glede določanja dobrih praks in, kar je pomembneje, prenašanja teh praks med regijami.
Almost half of these operations concern issues of economic development, job creation, entrepreneurship, information society and technological innovation.
Temam (gospodarskim) v okviru prednostne naloge 1 je bilo dodeljenih približno 55 odstotkov proračuna, ki znaša 321 milijonov EUR, temam (okoljskim) v okviru prednostne naloge 2 39 odstotkov, 6 odstotkov proračuna pa je bilo dodeljenega tehnični pomoči programov.
Significant results have been achieved in terms of identifying good practices and, more importantly, transferring these practices between regions.
Te prednostne naloge obravnava trenutno približno 75 odstotkov dejavnosti programa INTER-REG IIIC.
What future is there then for the next budget period 2007-2013?
Kakšna so pričakovanja za prihodnje proračunsko obdobje 2007–2013?
Interregional cooperation will continue to develop under the INTERREG IVC programme.
Medregionalno sodelovanje se bo še naprej razvijalo v okviru programa INTERREG IVC.
It will build on the success of the IIIC programme, certain aspects of which have been retained, while also introducing new priorities and approaches.
Gradilo se bo na uspehu programa IIIC, saj so se nekateri njegovi vidiki ohranili, hkrati pa bodo uvedeni tudi novi pristopi in prednostne naloge.
Unlike the INTERREG IIIC programme, which was divided into four administrative regions, INTERREG IVC has one Managing Authority (Région Nord–Pas de Calais) and a Joint Secretariat based in Lille, France.
V nasprotju s programom INTERREG IIIC, ki je bil razdeljen na štiri upravne regije, ima program IN-TERREG IVC en organ upravljanja (regija Nord–Pas de Calais) in skupni sekretariat s sedežem v Lillu v Franciji.
Four Information Points are located across Europe – in Rostock (Germany), Katowice (Poland), Valencia (Spain) and within the Secretariat in Lille – as points of contact for projects and regions.
V Evropi so štiri informacijske točke: za stik za projekte in regije, in sicer v Rostocku (Nemčija), Katovicah (Poljska), Valencii (Španija) in v sekretariatu v Lillu.
Two types of interventions are possible under IN-TERREG IVC: ‘Regional Initiative’ projects, which focus on exchanging experience and transferring good practices, and ‘Capitalisation’ projects, which include Fast Track projects seeking to optimise the transfer of results and good practices into mainstream programmes.
Program INTERREG IVC omogoča dve vrsti posredovanj: projekte „regionalnih pobud“, ki so osredotočeni na izmenjavo izkušenj in prenos dobrih praks, ter projekte „uporabe“ (capitalisation), ki vključujejo „hitre“ (fast track) projekte za optimizacijo prenosa rezultatov in dobrih praks v glavne programe.
e “ChangeLAB” INTERREG project aims to encourage environmentally friendly patterns of consumption without lowering quality of life and prosperity.
Projekt „ChangeLAB“ programa INTERREG si prizadeva spodbujati okolju prijazne vzorce potrošnje brez zmanjšanja kakovosti življenja in blaginje.
Interest in the INTERREG IVC programme is already very high, and the Joint Technical Secretariat can assist applicants in several different ways – Frequently Asked Questions, Lead Applicant Seminars and Individual Consultations.
Zanimanje za program INTERREG IVC je že zdaj zelo veliko, skupni tehnični sekretariat pa lahko pomaga prosilcem na več različnih načinov, s pogosto zastavljenimi vprašanji, seminarji za glavne prosilce in individualnimi posvetovanji.
All information is available for download on the INTERREG IVC website.
Vse informacije lahko prenesete s spletne strani programa INTERREG IVC.
Main activity: Interregional cooperation EU contribution (ERDF): €321 000 000
Pozdravljam to nadaljevanje medregionalnega sodelovanja.
I welcome this continuation in interregional cooperation.
Pomembno je tudi, da bodo lahko regionalni in lokalni organi še naprej sodelovali in izmenjevali izkušnje.
Countries concerned: EU-27 Member States, Norway and Switzerland o
To dokazuje, da se Evropska komisija in države članice zavedajo, da medregionalno sodelovanje res pomaga izboljševati regionalne politike, kar je zelo
“From URBACT I to URBACT II: a new era in urban cooperation and exchange”
„Od programa URBACT I do programa URBACT II: nova doba urbanega sodelovanja in izmenjave“
Anne-Laure Guignard, URBACT Communication Manager
Anne-Laure Guignard, vodja enote za komuniciranje programa URBACT
• 8 ematic working groups: for 18 months, these working groups brought together practitioners on the ground, experts and researchers in order to address a precise topic of particular relevance to European cities and to Community priorities.
• Osem tematskih delovnih skupin: v teh delovnih skupinah so bili osemnajst mesecev zbrani strokovni delavci s terena, strokovnjaki in raziskovalci, da bi obravnavali točno določeno temo posebnega pomena za evropska mesta in prednostne naloge Skupnosti.
URBACT was created by the European Commission and 14 Member States to develop transnational exchanges of experience between the cities participating in the URBAN I and II programmes.
Program URBACT so oblikovale Evropska komisija in štirinajst držav članic, da bi razvile transnacionalno izmenjavo izkušenj med mesti, ki sodelujejo v programih URBAN I in II.
Since 1 May 2004, all cities of the new Member States can also participate in this initiative, which aims to identify the lessons learnt and disseminate the knowledge to all European cities.
Pri tej pobudi, katere namen je ugotoviti pridobljena nova spoznanja in razširjati znanje vsem evropskim mestom, lahko od 1. maja 2004 sodelujejo tudi vsa mesta iz novih držav članic.
URBACT I 2002-2006: a laboratory for challenging territories
URBACT I 2002–2006: raziskovalno središče za težavna ozemlja
• Knowledge Transfer (e.g. the Support for cities initiative): intended principally for the new Member States, to provide participating cities with support in terms of skills and knowledge provided by experts with experience in integrated urban policy on defining and developing integrated urban strategies (involved 43 cities from 8 different countries).
• Prenos znanja (na primer podpora za mestne pobude): je namenjen pretežno novim državam članicam, da bi sodelujočim mestom zagotovile podporo v zvezi s spretnostjo in znanjem strokovnjakov, ki imajo izkušnje iz celostne urbanistične politike, in v zvezi z opredeljevanjem in razvijanjem celostnih strategij o mestih. (Vključenih je bilo triinštirideset mest iz osmih različnih držav.)
URBACT I included the participation of 230 cities, with a third of these from the new Member States. e programme focused on creating and facilitating thematic networks and working groups to tackle issues related to urban regeneration, local development, citizenship, and also youth issues.
V programu URBACT I je sodelovalo 230 mest, med njimi tretjina iz novih držav članic. Program je bil osredotočen na oblikovanje in spodbujanje tematskih mrež in delovnih skupin za reševanje vprašanj v zvezi s prenovo mest, lokalnim razvojem, državljanstvom in tudi vprašanj v zvezi z mladimi.
• Capitalisation tools: Capitalisation relies on certain tools and resources that are made available to local actors: thematic files on the website, crosscutting thematic working groups, thematic conferences.
• Orodja, ki omogočajo „uporabo“ (capitalisation): „Uporaba“ je odvisna od nekaterih orodij in virov, ki so na voljo lokalnim udeležencem: tematske datoteke na spletni strani, tematske delovne skupine z različnih področij, tematske konference.
• 20 ematic networks: created around specific themes of urban policy, respecting an integrated approach, with each establishing its own approach, key questions and practical projects.
• Dvajset tematskih mrež: oblikovane so v zvezi s posebnimi temami urbanistične politike, upoštevajo celostni pristop, vsaka pa določa svoj novi pristop, glavna vprašanja in praktične projekte.