natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In 2009 the Court estimates that at least 3 % of the expen­diture certified by Member States to the Commission in Cohesion should not have been reimbursed.
EUR) s 95-odstotno stopnjo zaupanja, kot je prikazano v tabeli 4.1. Sodišče ocenjuje, da leta 2009 vsaj 3 % odhodkov, ki so jih države članice za kohezijo potrdile Komisiji, ne bi smeli biti povrnjeni.
The corresponding figures in 2008 (2008 Annual Report, paragraph 6.17) and 2007 (2007 Annual Report, paragraph 6.27) were 11 %.
Ta delež je v letih 2008 (letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavek 6.17) in 2007 (letno poročilo za leto 6.27) znašal 11 %.
The Commission takes note that none of the errors in the audited sample related to public procurement concerns the ESF.
Komisija opozarja, da nobena od napak v revidiranem vzorcu, pove­zana z javnimi naročili, ne zadeva ESS.
Examples of eligibility errors
Primeri napak v zvezi z upravičenostjo
(a) The Commission will follow up this issue and ensure that the necessary correction is made.
(a) Komisija bo spremljala ta problem ter zagotovila, da bo opravljen ustrezen popravek.
The Commission will continue to encourage Member States to widen the use of flat-rate indirect costs, in order to avoid such errors.
Še naprej bo spodbujala države članice k razširitvi uporabe pavšalnih posrednih stroškov, da bi preprečila tovrstne napake.
(a) Overdeclaration of staff costs: In the case of an ESF project supporting professional training courses for pupils from secondary schools, the beneficiary incor- rectly charged various indirect costs (staff salaries, insurance, fuel, telephone and depreciation) to the project.
(a) Prijavljanje previsokih stroškov dela: pri projektu ESS za podporo tečajev poklicnega usposabljanja dijakov srednjih šol je upravičenec projektu nepravilno pripisal različne posredne stroške (plače zaposlenih, zavaro- vanje, gorivo, telefon in amortizacijo).
(b) The Commission notes that the value of the contract was above the threshold specified in the applicable EU Directive on public procurement.
(b) Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila vrednost naročila nad pragom, določenim v ustrezni direktivi EU o javnih naročilih.
The Commission agrees with the existence of error in this case.
Komisija se v tem primeru strinja z obstojem napake.
The Member State has also agreed and will apply a financial correction according to Commission guidelines.
Tudi država članica se strinja s to ugotovitvijo in bo izvedla finančni popravek v skladu s smernicami Komisije.
(b) Unjustified application of negotiated procedure: In the case of a CF project the procurement of services related to the administrative preparation and technical plan- ning for an infrastructure project was carried out by negotiated procedure.
(b) Neupravičena uporaba postopka s pogajanji: v primeru projekta KS so bile storitve v zvezi z administrativno pripravo in tehničnim načrtovanjem infrastrukturnega projekta naročene s postopkom s pogajanji.
The Court’s audit showed however that the conditions which have to be in place so that a negotiated procedure can be used were not fulfilled.
Vendar je Sodišče pri reviziji ugotovilo, da pogoji, ki so potrebni za uporabo postopka s pogajanji, niso bili izpolnjeni.
(c) The Commission notes that the value of the contract was below the threshold specified in the applicable EU Directive on public procurement.
(c) Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila vrednost naročila pod pragom, določenim v ustrezni direktivi EU o javnih naročilih.
The Commission agrees with the existence of error in this case and will apply a financial correction according to Commission guidelines.
Komisija se v tem primeru strinja z obstojem napake in bo naložila finančni popravek v skladu s svojimi smernicami.
(c) Direct award of contract: In the case of an ERDF project for the building of access roads and light constructions at the entrances of a national park, the beneficiary directly awarded works.
(c) Neposredna dodelitev pogodbe: pri projektu ESRR za izgradnjo dovoznih cest in postavitev razsvetljave na vhodih v nacionalni park, je upravičenec neposredno oddal naročila za dela.
In addition, this contractor also invoiced works which were not covered by the contract.
Poleg tega je ta izvajalec zaračunal dela, ki niso bila del pogodbe.
Due to the absence of public procurement procedure, the Court considers that the payments related to this contract are irregular.
Ker ni bilo postopka za oddajo javnega naročila, Sodišče meni, da plačila v zvezi s to pogodbo niso pravilna
(d) The Commission notes that the value of contracts were all below the thresholds of the applicable EU Directives on public procurement.
(d) Komisija ugotavlja, da je bila vrednost vseh naročil pod pragi, določenimi v ustreznih direktivah EU o javnih naročilih.
The Commission also notes that in the eight ERDF cases affected by a quantifiable error the national authorities had already applied proportionate financial corrections before certifying the expenditure to the Commission.
Komisija poleg tega opozarja, da so v osmih zadevah ESRR, na katere je vplivala količinsko opredeljiva napaka, nacionalni organi že uporabili sorazmerne finančne popravke, preden so odhodke potrdili Komisiji.
As a result, there is no negative financial impact on the EU budget.
Zato to ni imelo negativnega finančnega učinka na proračun EU.
(d) Unlawful use of award criteria: In the case of ten ERDF projects for the construction of roads those bidders offering a price equal or below the average were not differentiated, meaning that the competitive advantage of those offering the lowest prices was eliminated.
(d) Nezakonita uporaba meril za dodelitev: pri desetih projektih ESRR za gradnjo cest se ni razlikovalo med ponudniki, katerih ponujene cene so bile enake povprečju ali nižje od njega, kar je pomenilo, da ponudniki, katerih ponujene cene so bile najnižje, niso imeli konkurenčne prednosti.
This was detected by the programmes’ internal controls and corrections were made to offset the financial impact of this illegal procedure before expenditure was declared to the Commission.
To je bilo odkrito z notranjimi kontrolami programov in izvedeni so bili popravki za izravnavo finančnega učinka tega nezako- nitega postopka, preden so bili odhodki prijavljeni Komisiji.
Nevertheless, it resulted in contracts co-financed by ERDF being awarded to bidders who, in nine out of the 10 cases, had not submitted the offer that provided the best combination of price and quality.
Kljub temu so bile pogodbe, ki jih je sofinanciral ESRR, dodeljene ponudnikom, ki v devetih od desetih primerov niso predložili ponudbe, ki bi bila najboljša kombinacija cene in kakovosti.
The evaluation will focus primarily on analysing the cost-effectiveness of public procurement procedures and rules.
Ocena se bo osredotočila zlasti na analizo stroškovne učinkovitosti postopkov in pravil v zvezi z javnimi naročili.
The evaluation will also include a description of Member States’ implementation and administrative structure to implement public procurement policy, including EU legis­lation in this area.
Vključe­vala bo tudi opis izvajanja in administrativne strukture za izvajanje politike javnih naročil v državah članicah, vključno z izvajanjem zakonodaje EU na tem področju.
The results of the evaluation will be finalised by summer 2011.
Končni rezultati ocene bodo znani do poletja 2011.
In addition, a Commission interservice task force is examining the most common public procurement issues arising in the context of implementation of cohesion projects.
Poleg tega projektna skupina služb Komisije proučuje najpogostejše težave v zvezi z javnimi naročili, ki se pojavljajo pri izvajanju kohezij­skih projektov.
The Commission will continue training actions to Member State authorities on the correct application of public procurement rules.
Komisija bo še naprej izvajala usposabljanje za organe držav članic o pravilni uporabi pravil v zvezi z javnimi naročili.
Where appropriate, the Commission will continue to audit the appli­cation of the EU Directives on public procurement by carrying out its own enquiries in certain cases or by asking the Member States’ audit authorities to perform such enquiries on its behalf.
Po potrebi bo Komisija še naprej revidirala uporabo direktiv EU o javnih naročilih, bodisi tako, da bo v nekaterih primerih sama opravila poizvedbe, ali pa bo zaprosila revizijske organe držav članic, da opravijo take poiz­vedbe v njenem imenu.
The Commission also refers to its answer to paragraph 4.20.
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoj odgovor na odstavek 4.20.
Most of them were other compliance errors, mainly related to shortcomings in tendering and contracting procedures.
Te napake so večinoma sodile med druge napake v zvezi s skladnostjo, povezane predvsem s pomanj­kljivostmi v razpisnih postopkih in postopki oddaje javnega naročila.
OBSERVATIONS ON SYSTEMS
OPAŽANJA O SISTEMIH
The results of the examination of systems are summarised in Annex 4.2.
Rezultati preverjanja sistemov so povzeti v Prilogi 4.2.
They should be improved, particularly for some programmes, and the Commission will continue to pursue its efforts in this direction through advice, training actions and specific audits.
Zlasti za nekatere programe bi jih bilo treba izboljšati, za kar si bo Komisija še naprej prizadevala, in sicer s svetovanjem, ukrepi usposabljanja in posebnimi revizijami.
Only two out of the 16 programmes audited by the Court had expenditure declared in 2008.
Večina revizijskih organov ni izvedla dovolj revizij plačil, ki bi bile končane pravočasno, da bi jih lahko vključili v letno poročilo o kontroliranju za leto 2009.
Most Audit Authorities did not undertake a sufficient number of audits of payments in time for the 2009 annual control report.
Samo dva od 16 programov, ki jih je revidiralo Sodišče, sta imela prijavljene odhodke v letu 2008.
Several Member States did not perform any systems audits before expenditure was declared to the Commission ( 10 ).
Več držav članic ni izvedlo nobenih revizij sistemov, preden so bili odhodki prijavljeni Komisiji ( 10 ).
to recoveries and financial
Sistemi v zvezi z izterjavami in finančnimi popravki
Commission. This was done for four OPs and one Community Initiative in six Member States ( 11 ).
4.30 Sodišče je za štiri operativne programe in eno pobudo Skupnosti v šestih državah članicah ocenilo sisteme za obde­lavo napak, odkritih pri različnih nacionalnih naknadnih kontrolah, ter za poročanje Komisiji o izterjavah in umikih ( 11 ).
In some instances relevant information was not communicated to the Commission, in others it was not reliable or it had not been presented as foreseen in the instructions sent by the Commission.
V nekaterih primerih relevantne informacije niso bile sporočene Komisiji, v drugih primerih pa niso bile zanesljive oziroma niso bile predstavljene po navodilih Komi­sije.
This means that in these cases the Commission does not have reliable information on recoveries and with­drawals implemented by Member States.
To pomeni, da slednja v teh primerih nima zanesljivih informacij o izterjavah in umikih, ki jih izvedejo države članice.
Weaknesses in this respect were also noted by the Commission ( 13 ).
Slabosti glede tega je opazila tudi Komisija ( 13 ).
For the 20072013 period, there is a standardised procedure for submission of recovery statements through the IT system SFC2007.
Za obdobje 2007–2013 se uporablja standardiziran postopek za predložitev izjav o izterjavah prek informacijskega sistema SFC2007.
The Commission expects that this reporting procedure will improve the quality of information in its disposal.
Komisija pričakuje, da bo ta postopek poročanja izboljšal kakovost informacij, ki so ji na voljo.
Member States are also required to distinguish corrections deriving from their own controls and those from EU audits.
Države članice morajo poleg tega razli­kovati popravke, ki izhajajo iz njihovih lastnih kontrol, od tistih, ki izhajajo iz revizij EU.
( 10 ) For most OPs audited the first expenditure was certified to the Commission only the second half of 2009.
( 10 ) Za večino revidiranih operativnih programov so bili prvi odhodki potrjeni Komisiji šele v drugi polovici leta 2009.
( 11 ) The Court did not assess whether the Member States were effective in detecting errors.
( 11 ) Sodišče ni ocenilo, ali so bile države članice uspešne pri odkrivanju napak.
( 12 ) See the 2008 Annual Report, paragraph 6.30. ( 13 ) COM(2010) 52, point 1.6.
( 12 ) Glej letno poročilo za leto 2008, odstavek 6.30. ( 13 ) COM(2010) 52, točka 1.6.
The Commission considers that this gives a good indication on the effectiveness of the reinforced control provisions of the 20072013 regulatory framework, as well as the first impact of the 2008 Commission Action Plan to strengthen its supervisory role for structural actions.
Komisija meni, da to jasno kaže na uspešnost okrepljenih določb glede nadzora v regulativnem okviru 2007–2013, pa tudi prve učinke akcijskega načrta Komisije iz leta 2008 za krepitev njene nadzorne vloge pri strukturnih ukrepih.
The Commission will continue its persistent efforts to bring the error rate down to lower levels.
Komisija si bo še naprej vztrajno prizadevala za znižanje stopnje napak.
The Commission considers that for most of the remaining errors detected by the Court the national authorities did not have sufficient information to detect the errors when declaring the expenditure to the Commission.
Komisija meni, da za večino preostalih napak, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, nacionalni organi niso imeli zadostnih informacij, da bi te napake lahko odkrili, ko so prijavili odhodke Komisiji.
For the systems audited, the Court concludes that:
4.36 Sodišče je glede revidiranih sistemov prišlo do zaključka, da:
(a) The Commission notes that according to the Court’s assessment all 16 systems audited are compliant or partially compliant, which is an encouraging result for the 20072013 programming period.
(a) Komisija opozarja, da je v skladu z oceno Sodišča vseh 16 revidiranih sistemov skladnih ali delno skladnih, kar je spodbuden rezultat za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
(a) for 12 out of 16 OPs audited weaknesses were noted with regard to verifications carried out by Managing Authorities and/or systems audits undertaken by Audit Authorities.
(a) so bile za 12 od 16 revidiranih operativnih programov opažene slabosti glede pregledov, ki so jih izvedli organi upravljanja.
Overall the supervisory and control systems for the 20072013 programming period were at least partially in compliance with the audited key provisions of the regu­latory framework (see paragraphs 4.25 to 4.29); and
Na splošno so bili nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 vsaj delno v skladu z revidiranimi ključnimi določbami ureditvenega okvira (glej odstavke 4.25 do 4.29) in
The Commission refers also to its replies to paragraphs 4.26 and 4.29.
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoje odgovore na odstavka 4.26 in 4.29.
(b) The quality and completeness of data has been improving constantly due to Commission efforts under its 2008 Action Plan.
(b) Zaradi prizadevanj Komisije v okviru njenega akcijskega načrta iz leta 2008 se kakovost in popolnost podatkov stalno izboljšuje.
The Commission will complete in 2010 its on-the-spot audits of Member States systems for recoveries and issue recom­mendations for further improvement of the Member States reporting.
Komisija bo v letu 2010 dokončala revizije sistemov držav članic za izterjave na kraju samem ter izdala priporočila za nadaljnje izboljšanje poročanja držav članic.
(b) the Member States’ systems for recording and correcting errors of which they were aware for the 20002006 programming period were effective.
(b) so bili sistemi držav članic za evidentiranje in popravljanje napak, ki so se jih države članice za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 zavedale, uspešni.
Systems for reporting recoveries and withdrawals were partially effective which means that the Commission does not always receive reliable information on these financial corrections from Member States (see paragraphs 4.30 and 4.31).
Sistemi za poročanje o izter­javah in umikih so bili delno uspešni, kar pomeni, da Komisija od držav članic ne prejema vedno zanesljivih informacij o teh finančnih popravkih (glej odstavka 4.30 in 4.31).
For the 20072013 period, the legislative framework has been reinforced and provides for a standardised submission of information, which will improve the quality of information the Commission has in its disposal.
Zakonodajni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 je bil okrepljen in predvideva standardizirano predložitev podatkov, kar bo izboljšalo kakovost podatkov, ki so na voljo Komisiji.
The Commission also refer to its reply to paragraph 4.31.
Komisija se sklicuje tudi na svoj odgovor na odstavek 4.31.
The Court recommends the Commission to:
Sodišče Komisiji priporoča, naj:
(a) encourage national authorities to rigorously apply the corrective mechanisms prior to certification of the expen­diture to the Commission;
(a) nacionalne organe spodbuja k strogi uporabi mehanizmov za izvajanje popravkov, preden odhodke potrdijo Komisiji;
(a) The Commission refers to its actions to improve management verifications and the certification of expenditure to the Commission, under its Action Plan adopted in February 2008.
(a) Komisija se sklicuje na svoje ukrepe za izboljšanje upravnih pregledov in potrjevanja odhodkov Komisiji, izvedene v okviru akcijskega načrta, sprejetega februarja 2008.
It reaffirms its commitment to encourage national authorities by providing advice, training and guidance and by closely following up audit findings in this regard.
Ponovno potrjuje svojo zavezanost, da bo spodbujala nacionalne organe, tako da bo zagotavljala svetovanje, usposabljanje in navodila ter natančno spremljala revizijske ugotovitve v zvezi s tem.
(b) ensure that the substitution of ineligible with new expen­diture (withdrawal) does not result in new irregular expen­diture being declared by Member States; and
(b) Komisija aktivno spremlja tveganja, ugotovljena v letnem poročilu Sodišča za leto 2008, zlasti glede zaključka programov za obdobje 2000–2006.
(b) The Commission is actively following up the risk identified in the 2008 annual report of the Court, in particular in the context of the closure of the 20002006 programmes.
(b) zagotovi, da države članice pri zamenjavi neupravičenih odhodkov z novimi (umik) ne prijavijo novih nepravilnih odhodkov, in
(c) ensure, through its supervision, an effective functioning of the national management and control systems for the 20072013 programming period.
(c) s svojim nadzorom zagotovi uspešno delovanje nacionalnih upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov za programsko obdobje 2007–2013.
(c) The Commission will pursue the efforts undertaken under its 2008 Action Plan to improve the management and control systems in the Member States.
(c) Komisija bo nadaljevala z ukrepi, uvedenimi v okviru akcijskega načrta iz leta 2008, za izboljšanje upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov držav članic.
It will follow up the Court’s findings and will continue to verify the functioning of the Member States’ management and control systems, building on the annual audit opinions issued by the audit authorities and its own audit work.
Spremljala bo ugotovitve Sodišča ter nada­ljevala s preverjanjem delovanja upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov držav članic, pri čemer bo upoštevala letna revizijska mnenja, ki jih izdajajo revizijski organi, ter svojo lastno revizijsko dejavnost.
In addition, a Commission interservice task force is examining the most common public procurement issues arising in the context of implementation of cohesion projects.
Poleg tega projektna skupina služb Komisije proučuje najpogostejše težave v zvezi z javnimi naročili, ki se poja­vljajo pri izvajanju kohezijskih projektov.
The Commission will continue training actions to Member States authorities on the correct application of public procurement rules.
Komisija bo še naprej izvajala usposabljanje za organe držav članic o pravilni uporabi pravil v zvezi z javnimi naročili.
The Commission will, where applicable continue to audit the appli­cation of the EU directives on public procurement by carrying out its own enquiries in some cases or by asking the Member States’ audit authorities to perform such enquiries on its behalf.
Po potrebi bo Komisija še naprej revidirala uporabo direktiv EU o javnih naročilih, bodisi tako, da bo v nekaterih primerih sama opravila poizvedbe, ali pa bo zaprosila revizijske organe držav članic, da opravijo take poiz­vedbe v njenem imenu.
See Commission’s replies in Annex 4.4.
Glej odgovore Komisije pod točko Priloga 4.4.
RESULTS OF TRANSACTION TESTING FOR COHESION
REZULTATI PREIZKUŠANJA TRANSAKCIJ ZA KOHEZIJO
0 0 0 0 0 0 Interim/Final payments
0 0 0 0 0 0 vmesna/končna plačila
Analysis by type of error
Analiza transakcij, na katere so vplivale napake (po vrstah napak)
Most likely error rate:
Najverjetnejša stopnja napake:
Note: The error rates are calculated based on a representative statistical sample drawn from interim and final payments 2009 (23 billion euro) with a 95 % confidence level.
Opomba: Stopnje napak so izračunane na podlagi reprezentativnega statističnega vzorca vmesnih in končnih plačil za leto 2009 (23 milijard EUR) s 95-odstotno stopnjo zaupanja.
RESULTS OF EXAMINATION OF SYSTEMS FOR COHESION
REZULTATI PREVERJANJA SISTEMOV ZA KOHEZIJO
Managing Authority and Intermediate body (
Organ za upravljanje in posredniško telo (
Certifying Authority (
Organ za potrjevanje (
ESF - Denmark - More & better jobs ERDF - Hungary - Economic development
ESRR - Madžarska - Gospodarski razvoj
ERDF - Greece - Competitiveness and entrepreneurship
ESRR - Grčija - Konkurenčnost in podjetništvo
ERDF - Estonia - Development of Economic Environment
ESRR - Estonija - Razvoj za gospodarsko okolje radni
ESF - Poland - Human capital
ESS - Poljska - Človeški kapital
ESF - Portugal - Human potential of the
ESS - Portugalska - Človeški potencial list Evropske
ESF - France - Regional competitiveness and employment
ESS - Francija - Regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje unije
ERDF - Lithuania - Economic growth
ESRR - Litva - Gospodarska rast
CF - Hungary - Environment and Energy
KS - Madžarska - Okolje in energetika
ERDF - Spain - Castilla-La Mancha
ESRR - Španija - Kastilija in Manča
Key requirements tested
Ključne preizkušene zahteve skladno
1 ) Management verifications 2 ) Reliable and soundly based certifications
1 ) pregledi upravljanja 2 ) zanesljiva in dobro utemeljena potrjevanja
) Adequate systems' audit
) ustrezna revizija sistemov delno skladno neskladno
Recording of errors
Evidentiranje napak
Irregularity reporting to OLAF
Poročanje Komisiji o popravkih
Correction reporting to Commission
Poročanje uradu OLAF o nepravilnostih
ERDF - Spain - Information Society
ESRR – Španija – Informacijska družba
‘ERDF - INTERREG Germany/Czech Republic - System Czech Republic’
ESRR – INTERREG Nemčija/Češka Sistem Češka
ERDF - Poland - Improvement of competitiveness i c i a l
ESRR – Poljska – Povečanje konkurenčnosti
Journal
Legenda radni uspešno delno uspešno list Evropske neuspešno
Not applicable: does not apply or not assessed
NR ni relevantno: se ne uporablja ali ni bilo ocenjeno unije
RESULTS OF REVIEW OF COMMISSION MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS FOR COHESION
REZULTATI PREGLEDA POSLOVODSKIH PREDSTAVITEV KOMISIJE ZA KOHEZIJO
Court observations
Glavni zadevni generalni direktorati
Nature of declaration given by Director-General (*)
Vrsta izjave, ki jo je podal gene­ralni direktor (*)
Overall assessment of reliability
Skupna ocena zane­sljivosti
A total of 138 OPs were affected in 2009, against 99 in 2008 and 185 in 2007.
Leta 2009 so se nanašali na skupno 138 operativnih programov, leta 2008 na 99, leta 2007 pa na 185.
For Cohesion, the Court considers that the Director-general's declaration and the annual activity report are established according to the applicable Commission guidelines.
Sodišče meni, da sta izjava generalnega direktorja in letno poročilo o dejavnostih za kohezijo pripravljena v skladu z veljavnimi smernicami Komisije.