natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As for the applicant's second plea, alleging, in essence, that the Council had failed to properly apply the principle of proportionality in assessing whether partial disclosure of the note was possible, the Court took the view that this possibility had been thoroughly examined by the Council, which had also consulted the
Glede drugega ugovora tožnika, da Svet pri presoji možnosti delnega razkritja ni pravilno uporabil načela sorazmernosti, je Sodišče menilo, da je Svet podrobno preučil to možnost in se v zvezi s tem
Commission on this question pursuant to Article 4(4) of Regulation No 1049/2001
31 vprašanjem tudi posvetoval s Komisijo v skladu s členom 4(4) Uredbe št 1049/2001
Given the politically sensitive character of the WTO-negotiations referred to above, the Court found that the whole content of the note had to be regarded as sensitive, and that, in refusing the applicant partial access to that note, the Council's did not apply Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001 incorrectly.
Glede na politično občutljivo naravo omenjenih pogajanj v okviru STO je Sodišče ugotovilo, da je bilo treba celotno vsebino opombe šteti za občutljivo in da Svet ni nepravilno uporabil člena 4(6) Uredbe št. 1049/2001s tem, ko je zavrnil delni dostop tožnika do opombe.
As regards the applicant's third plea alleging the Council's failure to provide access to minutes of the 133 Committee (Deputies) and submitting that the absence of such minutes would render Article 2 of Regulation 1049/2001 devoid of any substance, the Court of First Instance took the view that it could not be concluded that the Council had acted in an arbitrary or unpredictable manner by failing to produce minutes on the first item on the Agenda of the Article 133 Committee of 19 December 200332.
Glede tretjega ugovora tožnika, da Svet ni omogočil dostopa do zapisnika seje Odbora iz člena 133 (namestniki) in trditve, da je člen 2 Uredbe št. 1049/2001, če ta zapisnik ne obstaja, brez smisla, je Sodišče prve stopnje menilo, da ni mogoče šteti, da je Svet ravnal arbitrarno in nepredvidljivo, s tem ko
As a result of this examination, the Council had concluded that such partial disclosure under Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001 would not be possible since the exceptions in Article 4(1)(a) of that Regulation applied to the Commission's note in its entirety.
Svet je na podlagi te preučitve ugotovil, da tako delno razkritje v skladu s členom 4(6) Uredbe št. 1049/2001 ni mogoče, ker izjeme iz člena 4(1)(a) te uredbe veljajo za celotno opombo Komisije.
The Court pointed out that – in order to fulfil the requirement of transparency which underlies Regulation No 1049/2001 - the institutions concerned must, in so far as possible and in a non-arbitrary and predictable manner, draw up and retain documentation relating to their activities.
Sodišče je poudarilo, da morajo za izpolnitev zahteve po preglednosti, na kateri temelji Uredba št. 1049/2001, zadevne institucije v največji možni meri ter nearbitrarno in predvidljivo pripraviti in hraniti dokumentacijo o svojih dejavnostih.
However, in the present case, the purely informative nature of the first agenda item of the meeting of 19 December 2003 and the fact that it did not call for any specific implementing measure explained why it was not necessary to minute it and why the item was not recorded in a summary report or other subsequent document of the Article 133 Committee.
Vendar je v tem primeru informativnost prve točke dnevnega reda seje z dne 19. decembra 2003 in to, da ta točka ni zahtevala nobenega posebnega izvedbenega ukrepa, razlog, da se ni štelo za potrebno, da bi se o seji sestavil zapisnik, in da o tej točki ni bilo sestavljeno zbirno poročilo ali drug naknadni dokument Odbora iz člena 133.
It could therefore not be concluded that the Council, in claiming that no minutes existed on the agenda item concerned, infringed the applicant's right to access to documents conferred by Regulation No 1049/2001.
Zato ni mogoče ugotoviti, da je Svet s tem, ko je zatrjeval, da o zadevni točki dnevnega reda ni zapisnika, kršil pravico tožnika do dostopa do dokumentov, kot je določena v Uredbi št. 1049/2001.
With regard to the refusal by the Council, in the absence of any minutes, to provide the applicant with information on the content of the discussions of the above-mentioned agenda item in a form capable of being disseminated, the Court noted that the scope of Regulation No 1049/2001, pursuant to Article 2(3) thereof, extends only to existing 'documents held by an institution, that is to say, documents drawn up or received by it and in its possession'.
Glede zavrnitve Sveta – zaradi neobstoja zapisnika –, da tožniku posreduje informacije o vsebini razprave glede navedene točke dnevnega reda v taki obliki, ki omogoča njihovo razširjanje, je Sodišče opozorilo na področje uporabe Uredbe št. 1049/2001, ki se v skladu s členom 2(3) uporablja samo za "dokumente, ki jih hranijo institucije, tj. za dokumente, ki jih institucije pripravijo ali prejmejo in so v njihovi lasti".
Consequently, the Council had not infringed the applicant's right of access to documents conferred by Regulation No 1049/2001 by refusing to provide it with information on the contents of the discussions relating to the first item on the agenda of the meeting of 19 December 2003, since that information did not exist in the form of a document that could be disseminated.
Tako Svet ni kršil pravice tožnika do dostopa do dokumentov iz Uredbe št. 1049/2001, s tem ko mu je zavrnil posredovanje informacij o vsebini razprav o prvi točki dnevnega reda seje z dne 19. decembra 2003, saj teh informacij ni bilo v obliki dokumenta, ki bi ga bilo mogoče razširjati.
As for the refusal by the Council to grant access to the records of the Commission and the Member States' delegations who attended the Committee meeting of 19 December 2003, the Court pointed out that the applicant had not asked the Council to grant it access to such internal records when submitting its confirmatory application, and the applicant's arguments concerning access to those records could therefore not be accepted.
Glede zavrnitve dostopa s strani Sveta do zapiskov Komisije in delegacij držav članic, ki so se udeležile seje z dne 19. decembra 2003, je Sodišče poudarilo, da tožnik v potrdilni prošnji ni prosil Svet, naj mu omogoči dostop do teh notranjih zapiskov. Trditve tožnika v zvezi z dostopom do teh zapiskov zato ni bilo mogoče sprejeti.
Moreover, even if the applicant's request had included a request for access to internal records drawn up by the Commission and Member States' delegations, the Council could not communicate those records pursuant to Article 2(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001, since they were neither held nor received by the Council.
Tudi če bi tožnik v prošnji navedel zahtevo za dostop do notranjih zapiskov Komisije in delegacij držav članic, Svet teh zapiskov ne bi mogel posredovati na podlagi člena 2(3) Uredbe št. 1049/2001, zato ker jih ni imel in jih ni prejel.
Judgment of 27 November 2007 in joined cases T-3/00 and T-337/04 (Pitsiorlas v. Council and ECB)
Sodba z dne 27. novembra 2007 v združenih zadevah T-3/00 in T-337/04 (Pitsiorlas proti Svetu in ECB)
Regarding the judgment of the Court of First Instance in joined cases T-3/00 and T-337/0433, it should be recalled that the applicant in these cases sought the annulment of the Council's decision of 30 July 1999 and the European Central Bank's decision of 8 November 1999 refusing access to a document concerning the Basle/Nyborg Agreement on the reinforcement of the European Monetary System as well as compensation under Articles 235 and 288, second paragraph, of the EC Treaty, for damages arising out of these refusals.
Glede sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje v združenih zadevah T-3/00 in T-337/0433 bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je tožnik v teh zadevah zahteval razveljavitev odločitve Sveta z dne 30. julija 1999 in odločitve Evropske centralne banke z dne 8. novembra 1999, s katerima mu je bil zavrnjen dostop do dokumenta o Sporazumu Basel-Nyborg o krepitvi Evropskega monetarnega sistema, ter odškodnina v skladu s členom 235 in drugim odstavkom člena 288 Pogodbe ES za škodo, ki izhaja iz teh zavrnitev.
In its judgment of 27 November 2007, the Court of First Instance considered that the ECB by its decision of 8 November 1999 had infringed on its duty to state reasons for its refusal, wherefore the decision of refusal should be annulled.
V sodbi z dne 27. novembra 2007 je Sodišče prve stopnje menilo, da ECB s svojo odločitvijo z dne 8. novembra 1999 ni izpolnil svoje obveznosti glede navedbe razlogov za zavrnitev, zato bi bilo treba odločitev o zavrnitvi razveljaviti.
The Court dismissed, however, the action for annulment as far as the Council was concerned as well as the action for damages against the two Community institutions.
Vendar pa je Sodišče zavrnilo ničnostno tožbo, kar zadeva Svet, in odškodninsko tožbo zoper omenjeni instituciji Skupnosti.
The request for access was submitted and subsequently examined under the provisions of Decision 93/731/EC, OJ 1993 L 340, 31.12.1993, p. 43.
Prošnja za dostop je bila predložena in pozneje preučena v skladu z določbami Sklepa 93/731/ES, UL 1993 L 340, 31.12.1993, str. 43.
In its decision of 30 July 1999 the Council had stated that the requested document had been drawn up by the Central Banks Governors and therefore invited the applicant to send his request directly to the author of the document in accordance with the provisions of Article 2(2) of Decision 93/731/EC on public access to documents34.
V odločitvi z dne 30. julija 1999 je Svet navedel, da so zahtevani dokument pripravili guvernerji Centralne banke, zato je pozvala tožnika, naj svojo prošnjo naslovi neposredno na avtorja dokumenta v skladu z določbami člena 2(2) Sklepa 93/731/ES o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov34.
The applicant, however, claimed that the Council had infringed the "basic Community law principle which provides for public access to documents" as well as Article 1 of Decision 93/731/EC and
Vendar pa je tožnik navedel, da je Svet kršil osnovno načelo prava Skupnosti, ki omogoča dostop javnosti do dokumentov, ter člen 1 Sklepa 93/731/ES in člen 253 Pogodbe ES (odsotnost obrazložitve).
Article 253 of the EC Treaty (failure to state the reasons).
V sodbi je Sodišče prve stopnje poudarilo, da Svet s svojo odločitvijo ni kršil niti pravice dostopa niti obveznosti, da navede razloge za svojo odločitev, niti načel smotrnega upravljanja in zaščite upravičenih pričakovanj.
In its ruling, the Court of First Instance, pointed out that, by its decision, the Council had neither infringed the right of access nor the obligation to motivate its decision, nor, for that matter, the principles of sound administration and protection of legitimate expectations: Where, as in the case at hand, the Council was not in possession of the documents corresponding to the request for access, Decision 93/731 did not require it to search for and identify the relevant documents, their respective authors and who was in possession of them in order to be able to inform accordingly the person seeking access.
Kadar Svet, kot v obravnavanem primeru, nima dokumentov iz prošnje za dostop, mu Sklep 93/731 ne nalaga, naj poišče in identificira zadevne dokumente, njihove avtorje in imetnike, da bi prosilca obvestil o dostopu.
In the present case, the Council none the less searched and managed to identify a document covered by the request for access, namely the report of the Committee of Governors, and helpfully referred the applicant to the ECB, the institution in possession of that document.
V obravnavanem primeru je Svet kljub temu iskal in identificiral dokument iz prošnje za dostop, in sicer poročilo Odbora guvernerjev, ter prosilca pravilno napotil na ECB, imetnika tega dokumenta.
The Court finally dismissed the action for damages against the Council and the ECB, stating that the conditions which must be met in order for extra-contractual liability to be incurred, concerning the existence of actual and certain damage and a direct causal link between that damage and the allegedly unlawful conduct of the defendants, were not satisfied.
Sodišče je tako zavrnilo odškodninsko tožbo zoper Svet in ECB z navedbo, da pogoji za ugotovitev nepogodbene odgovornosti, ki se navezujejo na obstoj resnične in gotove škode in neposredne vzročne zveze med to in domnevnimi nezakonitimi ravnanji toženih strank, niso bili izpolnjeni.
This provision, containing the so-called "originator rule", read as follows: "Where the requested document was written by a natural or legal person, a Member State, another Community institution or body, or any other national or international body, the application must not be sent to the Council, but direct to the author."
Ta določba, ki vsebuje t.i. "pravilo o izvoru" se glasi: "Kadar je avtor zaprošenega dokumenta fizična ali pravna oseba ali država članica, druga institucija ali organ Skupnosti ali drugo nacionalno ali mednarodno telo, se prošnja ne pošlje Svetu, ampak neposredno avtorju dokumenta."
The originator rule was abolished with the entry into force of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 on 3 December 2001, save for third party documents which, although held by the institutions, had been established prior to that date.
Pravilo o izvoru je bilo odpravljeno 3. decembra 2001, ko je začela veljati Uredba (ES) 1949/2001, razen za dokumente tretjih strani, ki jih sicer hranijo institucije, a so nastali pred tem datumom.
For further information on that issue, see Report from the Commission on the implementation of the principles in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, COM(2004) 45 final, pp. 7-8 and p. 14.
Za dodatne informacije v zvezi s tem glej Poročilo Komisije o izvajanju načel iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, COM (2004) 45 konč., str 7–8 in str. 14.
The Council's experience in implementing Regulation No 1049/2001 in 2007 highlights the importance of its public register as a search tool for members of the public seeking to keep abreast of developments at Community level.
Izkušnje Sveta pri izvajanju Uredbe št. 1049/2001 v letu 2007 poudarjajo pomembnost javnega registra kot iskalnika, s pomočjo katerega lahko posamezniki sproti sledijo razvoju dogodkov na ravni Skupnosti.
As we stated in the first part of this report, the number of individual users of the register increased by 22,4 % during the reference period, whereas the total number of visits rose by 21 % (2 078 602 visits in 2007 against 1 722 354 in 2006); this was the fifth successive annual increase.
Kakor je bilo navedeno v prvem delu tega poročila, se je število uporabnikov registra v referenčnem obdobju povečalo za 22,4 %, skupno število obiskov pa se je povečalo za 21 % (2.078.602 obiskov v letu 2007 v primerjavi z 1.722.354 obiski v letu 2006); to je že tretje zaporedno letno povečanje.
We should point out here that 67,2 % of the Council documents produced in 2007 – i.e. 108 343 of the 161 121 documents listed in the register – were made directly accessible to the public upon circulation.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da je 67,2 % dokumentov Sveta, ki so bili pripravljeni v letu 2007 – tj. 108.343 od 161.121 dokumentov, ki so navedeni v registru – postalo neposredno dostopnih javnosti takoj po objavi.
Lastly, since 1 February 2004 any new document to which the Council has provided partial access may be consulted online.
In nazadnje, od 1. februarja 2004 je možen tudi dostop prek interneta do vsakega novega dokumenta, za katerega je Svet odobril delni dostop.
It should come as no surprise, therefore, to learn that the number of requests for access in 2007 was somewhat lower than in 2006, when bearing in mind that the requests for access to Council documents relate almost exclusively to documents which are listed but not directly accessible via the register.
Zato ne preseneča dejstvo, da je bilo v letu 2007 nekoliko manj prošenj za dostop do dokumentov kot v letu 2006, saj se prošnje za dostop do dokumentov Sveta nanašajo skoraj izključno na dokumente, navedene v seznamu, ki pa niso neposredno dostopni prek registra.
As confirmed by the statistical data provided in the annex to this report, more than 50 % of the requests for access to Council documents which were submitted in 2007 refer to the areas of Justice and Home Affairs, External Relations - CFSP or Defence and Military Matters (ESDP).
Kot potrjujejo statistični podatki iz priloge k temu poročilu, se več kot 50 % prošenj za dostop do dokumentov Sveta, ki so bile vložene v letu 2007, nanaša na področji pravosodja in notranjih zadev ter zunanjih odnosov – SZVP ali na obrambne in vojaške zadeve (EVOP).
A total of 811 documents of the documents considered (representing roughly 10 % of the documents requested in 2007) were classified as CONFIDENTIEL UE or as RESTREINT UE; the often highly complex process of examining such documents represents an additional workload not only for the Council staff dealing with the requests as soon as they are received, but also for officials in the various departments which produced the documents, who in many cases must themselves examine the requested documents on the basis of Regulation No 1049/2001.
Skupno 811 vseh obravnavanih dokumentov (kar predstavlja približno 10 % dokumentov, zahtevanih v letu 2007) je bilo označenih kot CONFIDENTIEL UE ali RESTREINT UE; pogosto zelo zapleteni postopek preučevanja takšnih dokumentov predstavlja dodatno delovno breme ne samo za osebje Sveta, ki obravnava prošnje takoj po prejemu, ampak tudi za uradnike različnih drugih služb, kjer so dokumenti nastali, saj morajo v mnogih primerih sami preučiti zahtevane dokumente na podlagi Uredbe št. 1049/2001.
That said, despite the increasingly complex nature of the dossiers to be examined, the General Secretariat of the Council is coping with the ensuing administrative burden, while meeting the time-limits laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.
Ne glede na povečano kompleksnost dokumentacije, ki jo je treba preučiti, generalni sekretariat Sveta zmore upravno obremenitev, hkrati pa upošteva roke iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001.
By way of illustration, in 2007 processing time for initial requests was on average 13 working days.
Če ponazorimo, v letu 2007 je bilo za obravnavo začetnih prošenj v povprečju potrebnih 13 delovnih dni.
In respect of confirmatory applications, which are examined by the Working Party on Information before being submitted to Coreper and the Council for adoption, the average was 28 working days in 2007, compared to 24 working days in 2006.
Kar zadeva potrdilne prošnje, ki jih preuči Delovna skupina za informiranje, preden se predložijo Coreperju in Svetu v sprejetje, je bil v letu 2007 povprečni čas preučitve 28 delovnih dni v primerjavi s 24 delovnimi dnevi v letu 2006.
In this regard, the contribution made by the Working Party on Information to the processing of confirmatory applications must be noted.
V zvezi s tem je treba opozoriti na prispevek Delovne skupine za informiranje pri obravnavi potrdilnih prošenj.
The Working Party met on 15 occasions in 2007.
Delovna skupina se je v letu 2007 sestala 15-krat.
Its main tasks include examining documents in respect of which a confirmatory application has been made, and examining and finalising the draft replies to such applications, which in a number of cases deal with complex issues relating to public safety, defence and military affairs, or international relations.
Njene osnovne naloge vključujejo preučitev dokumentov, za katere je bila vložena potrdilna prošnja, pa tudi preučitev in dokončanje osnutkov odgovorov na te prošnje, ki v številnih primerih zadevajo zapletena vprašanja glede javne varnosti, obrambnih in vojaških zadev ali mednarodnih odnosov.
The rate of access to Council documents in 2007 fell in comparison to 2006 (78,9 % in 2007 as against 87,7 % in 2006).
Stopnja dostopa do dokumentov Sveta je v letu 2007 upadla v primerjavi z letom 2006 (78,9 % v letu 2007 za razliko od 87,7 % v letu 2006).
However, this must be seen in the light of the above-mentioned fact that a very considerable number of documents were made directly accessible to the public via the register as soon as they were circulated.
Vendar je treba na to gledati v luči navedenega dejstva, da je veliko število dokumentov postalo neposredno dostopnih javnosti prek registra takoj po objavi.
In conclusion, both the analysis of the processing of requests for access and the public's use of the register of Council documents suggest that the aims set by the Treaties and by Regulation No 1049/2001 continued to be achieved in 2007.
Prav tako pa analiza obdelave prošenj za dostop kot tudi javna uporaba registra dokumentov Sveta kažeta, da so bili cilji, določeni v Pogodbah in Uredbi št. 1049/2001, doseženi tudi v letu 2007.
STATISTICS ON PUBLIC ACCESS TO COUNCIL DOCUMENTS
Priloga k PRILOGI STATISTIČNI PODATKI O DOSTOPU JAVNOSTI DO DOKUMENTOV SVETA
Number of applications pursuant to Regulation No 1049/2001 2003 2004 2005
Število prošenj na podlagi Uredbe št. 1049/2001 2003 2004 2005
Number of documents requested by initial applications 2003 2004 2005
Število dokumentov, zahtevanih z začetnimi prošnjami 2003 2004 2005
Documents released by the General Secretariat of the Council at the initial stage 2003 2004 2005 2006
Število dokumentov, ki jih je generalni sekretariat Sveta razkril v začetni fazi 2003 2004 2005 2006
9.606 partially/wholly 1.928 8.984 partially/wholly 1.092 9.879 partially/wholly 1.254 6.281 partially/wholly 1.155 8.451 partially/wholly 945 5.178
9.606 delno/v celoti 1.928 8.984 delno/v celoti 1.092 9.879 delno/v celoti 1.254 6.281 delno/v celoti 1.155 8.451 delno/v celoti 945 5.178
Number of confirmatory applications (confirmatory applications may be made if initial application is refused)
Število potrdilnih prošenj (potrdilne prošnje se lahko vložijo, če je začetna prošnja zavrnjena) 2003 2004 2005 2006
Number of documents considered by the Council following confirmatory applications + number of documents released
Število dokumentov, ki jih je Svet preučil po prejemu potrdilnih prošenj + število razkritih dokumentov
15 partially/wholly 9 6
15 delno/v celoti 9 6
Rate of document released for the procedure as a whole 362003 2004 2005
Delež dokumentov, dostopnih za celoten postopek 362003 2004 2005
Number of documents referred to in the public Register + number of public/downloadable documents
Število dokumentov, dostopnih v javnem registru + število javnih/prenosljivih dokumentov
Based on 7.775 documents considered. Based on documents released wholly (left column) or wholly + partially (right column).
Na podlagi dokumentov, objavljenih v celoti (levi stolpec) ali v celoti + delno (desni stolpec).
Professional profile of the applicants (initial applications)
Poklicni profil prosilcev (začetne prošnje)
Public authorities (non-EU institutions, third-country representatives, etc.)
Javni organi (institucije, ki ne sodijo v okvir EU, predstavniki tretjih držav, itd.)
Members of the European Parliament and their assistants
Člani Evropskega parlamenta in njihovi pomočniki
Professional profile of the applicants (confirmatory applications)
Poklicni profil prosilcev (potrdilne prošnje)
Geographical spread of the applicants (initial applications)
Geografska porazdelitev prosilcev (začetne prošnje)
Geographical spread of the applicants (confirmatory applications)
Geografska porazdelitev prosilcev (potrdilne prošnje)
Luxembourg Hungary
Luksemburg Madžarska
Education/Youth
Izobraževanje/mladina
Health and Consumer Protection
Zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov
Economic and Monetary Policy
Ekonomska in monetarna politika
Tax Questions – Fiscal Issues
Davčna vprašanja – Fiskalne zadeve
External Relations – CFSP
Zunanji odnosi – SZVP
Civilian Protection
Zaščita civilistov
Defence and Military matters
Obrambne in vojaške zadeve
Assistance for Development
Pomoč za razvoj
Legal questions
Pravna vprašanja
General policy questions
Vprašanja splošne politike
Parliamentary Questions
Parlamentarna vprašanja
Reasons for refusal of access (replies provided by the General Secretariat of the Council at the initial stage)
Razlogi za zavrnitev dostopa (odgovore je poslal generalni sekretariat Sveta v začetni fazi)