natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
After several meetings and coordination through Eurojust, the two Member States agreed upon an extensive exchange of information and executed the related MLA requests.
Pc"̅xgfumgo"uvc"dknc" ngvc"4227" ¦ctcfk" hkpcpektcplc" vgtqtkuvk7pg"fglcxpquvk" x" umwrpgo"¦pgumw"
This was a very useful meeting and it is hoped that the appointment of contact points in the countries of the Western Balkan region will encourage relevant case referrals to Eurojust from national authorities in both that region and from EU Member States.
4228"kognk"xg7"rtknqžpquvk"¦c"qrgtcvkxpq"uqfgnqxcplg"u"mqngik"k¦"ftžcx"¦cjqfpgic"Dcnmcpc0
(Figures in millions of Euros)
*¥pgumk"x"oknklqpkj"gxtqx+
For the administration, the Legal Service works closely with the Administrative Director and the other units.
¦cfgxcj"x"¦xg¦k"u"vqnoc7gplgo"kp"wrqtcdq"mcftqxumgic"rtcxknpkmc0"Rtcxpc"unwždc"lg"rtcx"vcmq" qfiqxqtpc"¦c"xqfgplg"rtcxpkj"urqtqx0
In addition to its standard tasks aimed at facilitating the functioning of the EJN, in 2005 the activity of the EJN Secretariat was determined by two factors: the followup to the second EJN activity report 2002-2004 and the completion of the transfer of the Atlas and Solon websites.
X"¦xg¦k"u"rtxko"fglcxpkmqo"lg"dknc"pcnqic"ugmtgvctkcvc"Gxtqrumg"rtcxquqfpg"otgžg"urqfdwlcplg" kpvgtpg" tc¦rtcxg" q" k¦kfw." rtgfxugo" q" xrtcšcplkj." mk"uq" rqxg¦cpc" u" rqgpquvcxkvxklq" rtqeguc" qfnq7cplc"kp"pcfcnlplko"tc¦xqlgo"Gxtqrumg"rtcxquqfpg"otgžg0
• Combining the Eurojust Vision with our objectives; and
" " ̋" ¦ftwžgxcplgo"Gwtqlwuvqxg"xk¦klg"¦"pcškok"eknlk"kp
Proactively generate multilateral coordination meetings;
̋" rtgfuvcxkvxg"Gwtqlwuvqxg"fqfcpg"xtgfpquvk"x"vgo"uokunw.
She joined Eurojust in January 2003. She was elected Vice-President in January 2004.
7ncp"Gwtqlwuvc."lg"dkn"incxpk"mtqpumk"vqžknge"¦c"Uwuugz"x"Cpinklk0
may be linked investigations or prosecutions in other countries, whose authorities may in turn be able to assist them with their own national cases.
Rtgfpquv" fclglq" uvctko." qdk7clpko" pc7kpqo" mqowpkektcplc" ¦" ftwikok" egpvtcnpkok" qticpk"x"ftžcxcj"7ncpkecj0
• Feedback is limited to the execution of the request but is not given about the overall outcome of the case or other crossborder requests in the case.
̋"" Pgmcvgtk" pcekqpcnpk" rtgfuvcxpkmk" rq¦cdnlclq" rqutgfqxcvk" rqxtcvpg" kphqtoceklg" pcekqpcnpgow"rtgfuvcxpkmw"xrngvgpg"ftžcxg0
Report
POROČILO
Eurojust building 1 - the Arc
Sedež Eurojusta (zgradba Arc)
TABlE OF COnTEnTS
VSEbINA
1 GeneraL information on activities anD manaGement ................................................9
1 SPlošne informacije o dejavnoStih in uPravljanju ...................................................9
Operational activities .....................................................................................................................................................9 Relations with States and organisations outside the European Union ....................................................................................9Administrative issues ...................................................................................................................................................11 Information technology ................................................................................................................................................11Public access to Eurojust documents ..............................................................................................................................12
Operativne dejavnosti ....................................................................................................................................................9 Odnosi z državami in organizacijami izven Evropske unije ..................................................................................................9Administrativne zadeve ................................................................................................................................................11 Informacijska tehnologija .............................................................................................................................................11Javni dostop do Eurojustovih dokumentov ......................................................................................................................12
Terrorism ........................................................................................................................................................17Drug trafficking ...............................................................................................................................................19THB ...............................................................................................................................................................21 Fraud .............................................................................................................................................................21Corruption ......................................................................................................................................................24Cybercrime .....................................................................................................................................................25Money laundering ............................................................................................................................................26Other activities related to the presence of OCGs in the economy ...........................................................................29European Arrest Warrants ................................................................................................................................31Joint Investigation Teams .................................................................................................................................34
Terorizem ........................................................................................................................................................17Nedovoljena trgovina z mamili ..........................................................................................................................19Trgovina z ljudmi .............................................................................................................................................21 Goljufija .........................................................................................................................................................21Korupcija ........................................................................................................................................................24Spletni kriminal ...............................................................................................................................................25Pranje denarja ................................................................................................................................................26Druge dejavnosti povezane z navzočnostjo organiziranih kriminalnih združb v gospodarstvu .....................................29Evropski nalog za prijetje in predajo ..................................................................................................................31Skupne preiskovalne skupine ............................................................................................................................33
3 reLations With eU partners .........................................................................................36
3 odnoSi S Partnerji v evroPSki uniji ...........................................................................36
European Judicial network ............................................................................................................................................36Europol ....................................................................................................................................................................... 37 OlAF ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Evropska pravosodna mreža .........................................................................................................................................36Europol .......................................................................................................................................................................37OLAF .......................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Frontex ......................................................................................................................................................................39
Activities of the Informal Working Group ........................................................................................................................42Internal implementation at Eurojust ...............................................................................................................................43
Aktivnosti neformalne delovne skupine ..........................................................................................................................42Interna implementacija v Eurojustu ...............................................................................................................................43
Figure 1: Case evolution ............................................................................................................................................50Figure 2: General case classification ............................................................................................................................51Figure 3: Priority crime types in Eurojust cases .............................................................................................................52Figure 4: Priority crime types and other crime types in Eurojust cases .............................................................................53Figure 5: Eurojust cases, requesting countries ..............................................................................................................54 Figure 6: Eurojust cases, requested countries ...............................................................................................................55Figure 7: Total number of coordination meetings .........................................................................................................56Figure 8: Coordination meetings, requesting countries .................................................................................................57Figure 9: Coordination meetings, requested countries ..................................................................................................58
Grafični prikaz 1: Predloženi primeri .............................................................................................................................50Grafični prikaz 2: Splošna razvrstitev primerov ..............................................................................................................51Grafični prikaz 3: Prednostne vrste kaznivih dejanj obravnavanih pri Eurojustu ...................................................................52Grafični prikaz 4: Prednostne vrste kaznivih dejanj in druge vrste kaznivih dejanj obravnavanih pri Eurojustu ........................53Grafični prikaz 5: Eurojustovi primeri, države prosilke .....................................................................................................54 Grafični prikaz 6: Eurojustovi primeri, zaprošene države ..................................................................................................55Grafični prikaz 7: Skupno število koordinacijskih srečanj .................................................................................................56Grafični prikaz 8: Koordinacijska srečanja, države prosilke ...............................................................................................57Grafični prikaz 9: Koordinacijska srečanja, zaprošene države ...........................................................................................58
lIST OF ABBREVATIOnS
SEZNAM OKRAJŠAV
Analysis Work File cms .........
Analitični delovni akt cmS .........
Case Management System eaW .......
Sistem za upravljanje primerov eaW .......
European Arrest Warrantejn ..........
Evropski nalog za prijetje in predajoejn ..........
European Judicial networkencs .......
Evropska pravosodna mreža encS .......
Eurojust national Coordination Systemepoc .......
Eurojustov sistem nacionalne koordinacije ePoc .......
European Pool against Organised Crimefatf ........
Evropska povezava za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalufatf ........
Financial Action Task Force iWG .........
Projektna skupina za finančno ukrepanje iWg .........
Informal Working Group on the implementation of the new Eurojust Decision in the Member Statesjit ..........
Neformalna delovna skupina za implementacijo novega Sklepa o Eurojustu v državah članicahjit ..........
Joint Investigation Team Ltte ........ liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam mLa .........
Skupna preiskovalna skupinaltte ........ Osvobodilna organizacija tamilskih tigrovmla .........
Mutual legal Assistanceocc .........
Medsebojna pravna pomočocc .........
On-Call Coordination ocG .........
Nujna koordinacijska enotaocg .........
Organised Crime Groupocta ......
Organizirana kriminalna združbaocta ......
Organised Crime Threat Assessment osr .........
Ocena ogroženosti zaradi organiziranega kriminala oSr .........
Organisational Structure Review pKK .........
Notranji pregled organizacijske strukture Pkk .........
Kurdistan Workers’ Partyrocta .....
Kurdistanska delavska strankarocta .....
Russian Organised Crime Threat Assessment te-sat ....
Ocena ogroženosti zaradi ruskega organiziranega kriminala te-Sat ....
Terrorism Situation and Trend Reportthb .........
Poročilo o razmerah in trendih na področju terorizmathb ......... Trgovina z ljudmi
I am pleased to present Eurojust’s eighth annual report, which reviews our activities in 2009.
Z veseljem predstavljam osmo Eurojustovo letno poročilo o naših dejavnostih v letu 2009.
It highlights aspects of the work undertaken by Eurojust in its mission to help fight serious crime affecting two or more Member States of the European Union.
V poročilu so poudarjeni vsi tisti vidiki dela Eurojusta pri opravljanju njegovega poslanstva v boju proti težjim oblikam kriminala, v katere sta vpleteni dve ali več držav članic EU.
2009 brought important changes to the environment in which Eurojust operates.
Leto 2009 je prineslo pomembne spremembe v okolju, v katerem deluje Eurojust.
The lisbon Treaty entered into force, the Stockholm Programme was adopted and a new Eurojust Decision was published.
Začela je veljati Lizbonska pogodba, sprejet je bil Stockholmski program in objavljen je bil novi Sklep o Eurojustu.
Work continued to ensure that Eurojust meet the challenges of this new environment, including the possibility of establishing a European Public Prosecutor’s Office from Eurojust.
Še naprej se je Eurojust soočal z izzivi tega novega okolja, vključno z možnostjo ustanovitve Evropskega javnega tožilstva izhajajočega iz Eurojusta.
Changes designed for operational effectiveness marked the year.
Leto so zaznamovale spremembe na področju operativne učinkovitosti.
In particular, the new Eurojust Decision gives a central place to strengthening our casework capacities.
Novi Sklep o Eurojustu zlasti poudarja osrednji pomen krepitve zmogljivosti pri obravnavi primerov.
The Decision makes new powers available to Eurojust; information flows and coordination with national authorities are facilitated; the 24/7 nature of Eurojust’s work is put on a formal basis; and Eurojust will host the Secretariat of the network for Joint Investigation Teams and other network secretariats.
S Sklepom je Eurojust dobil nova pooblastila, omogočena sta pretok informacij in sodelovanje z nacionalnimi organi, v Eurojustu je uradno uveden 24-urni delovnik vseh sedem dni v tednu, poleg tega pa bo Eurojust gostil sekretariat mreže za skupne preiskovalne skupine in sekretariate drugih mrež.
The operational emphasis was accompanied, as in previous years, by a substantial increase in the number of cases that Member States referred to Eurojust.
Tako kot prejšnja leta je operativno delo tudi letos zaznamovalo precejšnje zvišanje števila primerov, ki so jih države članice predložile kolegiju Eurojusta.
There was a 15 per cent rise in caseload compared to the preceding year, with almost 1,400 new cases registered on Eurojust’s Case Management System.
Število obravnavanih primerov se je v primerjavi s predhodnim letom povečalo za 15 odstotkov, v Eurojustovem sistemu za upravljanje primerov pa je bilo skoraj 1 400 novih obravnavanih primerov.
Cooperation beyond the immediate boundaries of the European Union was strengthened by the appointment of a liaison prosecutor from Croatia to join colleagues from norway and the USA.
Z imenovanjem tožilca za zvezo iz Hrvaške, ki se je pridružil kolegoma z Norveške in iz Združenih držav Amerike, se je okrepilo sodelovanje z državami v neposredni bližini Evropske unije.
Eurojust continued to seek ways to improve the management of its work.
Eurojust je še naprej proučeval možnosti za izboljšanje upravljanja svojega dela.
An Organisational Structure Review was started to see how Eurojust could function more efficiently.
Začel se je notranji pregled organizacijske strukture zaradi ugotavljanja možnosti za učinkovitejše delovanje Eurojusta.
On the domestic front, negotiations continued about new premises, which would allow us to work in one building rather than two as at present.
Na domačem terenu so se nadaljevala pogajanja o novih prostorih, ki bi nam omogočili, da delamo v eni zgradbi namesto na sedanjih dveh lokacijah.
In May 2009, a new Administrative Director, Hans Jahreiss, was appointed.
Maja 2009 je bil imenovan novi upravni direktor, Hans Jahreiss.
In December, José luís lopes da Mota, then President and long-serving national Member for Portugal, resigned.
Decembra je odstopil dotedanji predsednik Eurojusta in dolgoletni nacionalni predstavnik Portugalske, José Luís Lopes da Mota.
Elections for a new President were held in February 2010.
Volitve za novega predsednika so potekale februarja 2010.
Following a Council recommendation, this year’s Annual Report focuses on Eurojust’s operational work in the light of EU priorities regarding the fight against serious and organised crime.
V skladu s priporočilom Sveta je letošnje letno poročilo osredotočeno na Eurojustovo operativno delo v luči prednostnih nalog EU glede boja proti težjim oblikam organiziranega kriminala.
On the basis of work undertaken in 2009, Eurojust is confident that it can maintain and improve its contribution to meeting those priorities.
Na podlagi rezultatov doseženih v letu 2009 je Eurojust prepričan, da lahko še naprej vedno uspešnejše prispeva k izvajanju teh nalog.
aLeD WiLLiams President of Eurojust March 2010
aled WilliamS Predsednik Eurojusta Marec 2010
Eurojust College of National Members, February 2010
Kolegij nacionalnih predstavnikov v Eurojustu, februar 2010
GEnERAl InFORMATIOn On ACTIVITIES AnD MAnAGEMEnT
SPLOŠNE INFORMACIJE O DEJAVNOSTIH IN UPRAVLJANJU
1 General information on activities and management
1 Splošne informacije o dejavnostih in upravljanju
Operational activities and coordination meetings are provided in the annex.
Operativne dejavnosti logi so navedeni dodatni statistični podatki o obravnavi primerov in koordinacijskih srečanjih.
Following the priorities set by the Council, Eurojust focused on the fight against terrorism, drug trafficking, trafficking in human beings, fraud, corruption, cybercrime, money laundering and other activities related to the presence of organised crime groups in the economy.
V skladu s prednostnimi nalogami, ki jih je določil Svet, se je Eurojust osredotočal na boj proti terorizmu, nedovoljeno trgovino z mamili, trgovino z ljudmi, goljufije, korupcijo, spletni kriminal, pranje denarja in druge dejavnosti, povezane s prisotnostjo organiziranih kriminalnih združb v gospodarstvu.
For the first time, Eurojust evaluated applications and administered Commission funding for JITs during 2009.
V letu 2009 je Eurojust prvič ocenil uporabo in upravljanje finančnih sredstev Komisije, ki so namenjena skupnim preiskovalnim skupinam.
Following the implementation of the new Eurojust Decision, Eurojust will host the Secretariat of the network for Joint Investigation Teams.
V skladu z implementacijo novega Sklepa bo Eurojust gostil sekretariat mreže za skupne preiskovalne skupine.
The number of cases referred to Eurojust by the Member States increased by 15 per cent over 2008 to 1,372 cases in 2009.
Število primerov, ki so jih države članice v letu 2009 predložile kolegiju Eurojusta, se je v primerjavi z letom 2008 povečalo za 15 odstotkov.
Relations with States and organisations outside the European Union
V letu 2009 je bilo obravnavanih 1372 primerov.
Eurojust’s powers under articles 6 and 7 of the Eurojust Decision were exercised on 10 occasions in 2009. nine recommendations were formally issued under article 6 of the Eurojust Decision, which enables national Members to ask competent Member State authorities to undertake specific casework action.
V letu 2009 je Eurojust uporabil svoja pooblastila v skladu s členoma 6 in 7 Sklepa o Eurojustu v 10 primerih. Formalno je bilo izdanih devet priporočil v skladu s členom 6 Sklepa o Eurojustu, ki nacionalnim predstavnikom omogoča, da zaprosijo pristojne organe v državah članicah za izvajanje konkretnih ukrepov v zvezi z obravnavanimi primeri.
In one instance, the College acted under article 7 of the Eurojust Decision to resolve a problem of extradition of own nationals between Member States.
V enem primeru je kolegij ravnal v skladu s členom 7 Sklepa o Eurojustu pri reševanju problema izročitve državljanov v državah članicah.
In many cases, the formal use of powers under articles 6 and 7 is not necessary because recommendations have already been accepted through informal negotiations between the national Members and national authorities concerned.
V številnih primerih ni potrebna formalna uporaba pooblastil v skladu s členoma 6 in 7, ker so bila priporočila sprejeta že v neformalnih pogajanjih med nacionalnimi predstavniki in pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi.
Eurojust held 131 coordination meetings in 2009 with the participation of judges, prosecutors and investigators from the Member States.
Eurojust je v letu 2009 organiziral 131 koordinacijskih srečanj z udeležbo sodnikov, tožilcev in preiskovalcev iz držav članic.
Of these coordination meetings, 16 were held outside Eurojust for operational reasons.
16 srečanj je potekalo izven Eurojusta iz operativnih razlogov.
Two-thirds of the coordination meetings involved three or more countries.
Dveh tretjin koordinacijskih srečanj so se udeležile tri države ali več.
negotiation of cooperation agreements with the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Albania, Moldova, liechtenstein and Cape Verde were set as priorities in 2009.
Pogajanja o sporazumih o sodelovanju z Rusko federacijo, Ukrajino, Albanijo, Moldavijo, Liechtensteinom in Zelenort-skimi otoki so bila določena kot prednostne naloge v letu 2009.
Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Israel were added, as these countries formally expressed
Na listo prednostnih držav za začetek pogajanj so bile vključene še Srbija, Črna Gora, bosna
10 interest in cooperation agreements with Eurojust.
10 in Hercegovina ter Izrael, ker so te države uradno izrazile interes za sklenitev sporazumov o sodelovanju z Eurojustom.