natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They include social dialogue, gender equality policy, pre-accession assistance and operational grants to European agencies.
Vključujeta socialni dialog, politiko enakosti spolov, predpristopno pomoč in nepovratna sredstva za delovanje evropskih agencij.
Key information on the activities covered and the spending in 2009 is provided in Table 4.1.
Ključne infor­macije o obravnavanih dejavnostih in porabi v letu 2009 so v tabeli 4.1.
Administrative expenditure
Zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve upravni odhodki
Working in Europe – Social dialogue and mobility
Delo v Evropi – Socialni dialog in mobilnost
Administrative expenditure
Regionalna politika upravni odhodki
European Regional Development Fund and other regional operations
Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj in druge regionalne intervencije
Cohesion Fund (including ex-ISPA)
Kohezijski sklad (vključno z nekdanjim programom ISPA)
Solidarity Fund
Solidarnostni sklad
Total operational expenditure (
Operativni odhodki skupaj (
) (consisting of):
) (od tega):
— interim/final payments
— vmesna/končna plačila
Total payments for the year
Plačila za leto skupaj
( 1 ) The audit of administrative expenditure is reported in Chapter 9. ( 2 ) 25,4 billion euro (71 %) of the operational expenditure related to the 2007-13 period and 8,4 billion euro (24 %) to the 2000-06 period of the ERDF, CF and ESF. For the
( 1 ) Revizija upravnih odhodkov je predstavljena v poglavju 9. ( 2 ) 25,4 milijarde EUR (71 %) operativnih odhodkov v zvezi s programskim obdobjem 2007–2013 in 8,4 milijarde EUR (24 %) v zvezi s programskim obdobjem
2007-13 period 11,3 billion euro (44 %) were prefinancing payments.
Za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 so plačila v okviru predfinanciranja znašala 11,3 milijarde EUR (44 %).
Detailed information on budgetary implementation for 2009 can be obtained from Part II of the Annual Accounts of the European Communities Financial Year 2009, the EC’s (DG Budget) documents ‘Report on budgetary and financial management - financial year 2009’ as well as from the Report on the ‘Analysis of the budgetary implementation of the Structural and Cohesion Funds in 2009’.
Opomba: Podrobne informacije o izvrševanju proračuna za leto 2009 so na voljo v delu II letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropskih skupnosti za proračunsko leto 2009, v dokumentu Evropske komisije (GD za proračun) „Poročilo o upravljanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju - proračunsko leto 2009“ in v poročilu „Analiza izvrševanja proračuna strukturnih skladov in Kohezijskega sklada v letu 2009“.
Note: This Chapter also covers the Pre-accession (Special) Instrument I(S)PA, social dialogue and mobility policies and gender equality measures for both periods which are strictly speaking not part of Cohesion policy.
Opomba: To poglavje za obe obdobji zajema tudi (poseben) predpristopni instrument I(S)PA, politike socialnega dialoga in mobilnosti ter ukrepe za enakost med spoloma, kar strogo vzeto ni del kohezijske politike.
Rural development and fisheries expenditure are reported in policy areas 5 ‘Agriculture and rural development’, and 11 ‘Fisheries’.
Odhodki za razvoj podeželja in ribištvo so predstavljeni na področjih politike 5 - kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter 11 - ribištvo.
Source: Annual Accounts 2009.
Letni računovodski izkazi za leto 2009.
(a) the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for investments in infrastructure, the creation or preservation of jobs, local development initiatives and the activities of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);
(a) Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) za naložbe v infrastrukturo, ustvarjanje ali ohranjanje delovnih mest, pobude za lokalni razvoj ter dejavnosti malih in srednje velikih podjetij (MSP);
(b) the European Social Fund (ESF) which provides financial assistance to combat unemployment, to develop human resources and to promote integration into the labour market; and
(b) Evropski socialni sklad (ESS), iz katerega se dodeljuje fi- nančna pomoč za boj proti brezposelnosti, razvoj kadrov­skih virov in spodbujanje vključevanja na trg delovne sile ter
(c) the Cohesion Fund (CF) finances investments in infra­structure in the field of environment and transport in those Member States whose gross national income per capita is below 90 % of the EU average.
(c) Kohezijski sklad (KS) za financiranje naložb v infrastruk­turo na področju okolja in prometa v državah članicah, katerih bruto nacionalni dohodek na prebivalca je nižji od 90 % povprečja EU.
Cohesion spending is planned in multiannual ‘programming periods’: payments are related to expenditure which has been incurred within the eligibility period ( 1). As a result they may continue for some years beyond the end of the programming periods to which they relate.
Načrtuje se v večletnih „programskih obdobjih“, kar pomeni, da so plačila povezana z odhodki, ki so nastali znotraj obdobja upraviče­nosti ( 1 ) in se lahko tako izplačujejo še nekaj let po izteku programskih obdobij, na katera se nanašajo.
The 20002006 and 20072013 programming periods are relevant to this Chapter.
V tem poglavju sta obravnavani programski obdobji 2000–2006 in 2007–2013.
These projects are implemented by different types of promoters (private individuals, associations, private or public companies or local, regional or national bodies).
Te projekte izvajajo raznovrstni nosilci projektov (zasebniki, združenja, zasebne ali javne družbe ter lokalni, regionalni ali nacionalni organi).
At the start of the programmes the Commission makes prefinancing payments to the Member States.
Komisija na začetku programov s predfinanciranjem izvrši plačila državam članicam.
( 1 ) For the 20002006 programming period the eligibility period initially ended on 31 December 2008.
( 1 ) Za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 se je obdobje upravičenosti prvotno končalo 31. decembra 2008.
In the framework of the anti-crisis package it has been extended until 30 June 2009 for all Member States which made a request to the Commission.
V okviru protikriznega paketa je bilo podaljšano do 30. junija 2009 za vse države članice, ki so Komisiji predložile takšno zahtevo.
( 2 ) An OP sets out national, regional or sectorial priorities for delivering funds.
( 2 ) V operativnem programu so določene nacionalne, regionalne ali sektorske prednostne naloge za dodeljevanje sredstev.
For the 20072013 programming period 14,1 billion euro of interim payments and 11,3 billion euro of prefi­nancing payments were made.
Za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 so vmesna plačila znašala 14,1 milijarde EUR, predfinanciranje pa 11,3 milijarde EUR.
In addition, interim and final payments for the 20002006 period were 8,4 billion euro.
Poleg tega so bila za obdobje 2000–2006 izvršena vmesna in končna plačila v višini 8,4 milijarde EUR.
Supervision and control of Cohesion spending
Nadzor in kontrola kohezijske porabe
Responsibilities for day to day administration and the ‘first level’ controls which are intended to prevent or detect and correct incorrect reim­bursement of project costs or other irregularities are allocated to Managing Authorities and Intermediate Bodies.
Za tekoče upravljanje in „prvostopenjske“ kontrole, name­njene preprečevanju ali odkrivanju in popravljanju nepravilnih povračil stroškov za projekte in drugih nepravilnosti, so odgo­vorni organi za upravljanje in posredniška telesa.
Certifying Authorities carry out additional checks prior to submitting payment claims to the Commission.
Organi za potrjevanje opravijo dodatne preglede, preden Komisiji predlo­ žijo zahtevke za plačilo.
States are required to submit for acceptance to the Commission a report and an opinion for each OP.
Države članice morajo za vsak operativni program Komisiji v odobritev pred­ložiti poročilo in mnenje.
The report must explain whether management and control systems comply with the relevant regulations (‘compliance assessment report’).
V poročilu morajo pojasniti, ali so upravljavski in kontrolni sistemi skladni z relevantnimi pred­pisi („poročilo o oceni skladnosti“).
The Audit Authority has to submit an audit strategy within nine months of the approval of the programme.
Revizijski organ mora pred­ložiti revizijsko strategijo v devetih mesecih od odobritve programa.
In addition the Audit Authority is responsible for providing reasonable assurance on the effective functioning of the management and control systems of the programme, and as a consequence on the regularity of the expenditure certified ( 4 ), to the Commission through annual control reports ( 5 ) and annual opinions.
Poleg tega je revizijski organ odgovoren za podajo razumnega zagotovila o uspešnem delovanju upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov programa ter posledično tudi o pravilnosti potrjenih odhodkov ( 4 ), kar stori tako, da Komisiji predloži letna poročila o kontroli ( 5 ) in letna mnenja.
Member States must take action to recover or withdraw the undue payments made to beneficiaries of Cohesion spending.
Sprejeti morajo ukrepe za izterjavo ali umik neupravičenih plačil upravičencem do kohezijske porabe.
( 3 ) See Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
( 3 ) Glej Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 (UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
25) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 (OJ L 371,
25) in Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1828/2006 (UL L 371,
1). ( 4 ) See in particular Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
1). ( 4 ) Glej zlasti člen 62 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
( 5 ) The 2009 annual control report (which had to be submitted by the end of 2009) covers the results of the audits carried out during the period July 2008 to June 2009.
( 5 ) Letno poročilo o kontroli za leto 2009 (ki ga je bilo treba predložiti do konca leta 2009) vsebuje rezultate revizij, izvedenih v obdobju od julija 2008 do junija 2009.
It comprises system audits performed and audit of operations covering the expenditure declared to the Commission during the period January 2007 to December 2008.
V njem so opisane izvedene revizije sistemov in revizija poslovanja, ki zajema odhodke, prijavljene Komisiji v obdobju od januarja 2007 do decembra 2008.
The Commission performs its supervisory role through its own audit activity taking also account of other Community and national audit work and also through programmes negotiation, participation in monitoring committees, annual meetings with managing and audit authorities and by providing extensive guidance and seminars.
Komisija opravlja svojo nadzorno vlogo z lastno revizijsko dejavnostjo, pri čemer upošteva tudi revizije drugih organov Skupnosti in nacionalnih organov, pa prek pogajanj o programih, sodelovanja v nadzornih odborih, letnih sestankov z upravljavskimi in revizijskimi organi ter z zagotavljanjem obsežnih navodil in seminarjev.
The Commission has strengthened its supervision through the imple­mentation of its 2008 Action Plan (COM(2008) 97 final).
Komisija je z izvedbo akcijskega načrta iz leta 2008 (COM(2008) 97 konč.) okrepila svojo nadzorno vlogo.
If Commission audits find that Member States have failed to correct irregular expenditure or there are serious failings in the management and control systems, it interrupts and/or suspends payments to the Member State concerned ( 6 ).
Če pri revizijah ugotovi, da države članice niso popravile nepra­vilnih odhodkov ali da so v upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemih hujše pomanjkljivosti, prekine in začasno ustavi plačila zadevni državi članici ( 6 ).
If the Member State does not recover or withdraw the irregular expenditure (i.e. replace the excluded expenditure with other eligible expenditure) or remedy the detected system failures, the Commission may apply financial corrections, reducing EU funding accordingly.
Če država članica ne izterja ali umakne nepravilnih odhodkov (tj. če izključenih odhodkov ne nadomesti z drugimi, upravičenimi odhodki) ali če ne popravi napak, ki so bile odkrite v sistemih, lahko Komisija izvede finančne popravke, s katerimi ustrezno zmanjša financi­ranje iz EU.
In 2009 the Commission adopted 7 suspension decisions and imposed financial corrections totalling 2,3 billion euro.
V letu 2009 je Komisija sprejela 7 sklepov o odložitvi plačil in naložila finančne popravke v višini 2,3 milijarde EUR.
Specific risks to regularity
Posebna tveganja za pravilnost
Possible shortcomings in the implementation of the EU rules on public procurement and State aid at a national, regional or local level in applying EU law are not specifically related to the imple­mentation of cohesion projects.
Morebitne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju pravil EU o javnih naročilih in državnih pomočeh na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni pri uporabi zakonodaje EU niso vezane samo na izvajanje kohezijskih projektov.
The actors involved in implementing OPs and projects at national or regional level may be either unaware of the applicable rules or unsure about their correct interpretation.
Udeleženci pri izvajanju operativnih programov in projektov na nacionalni ali regionalni ravni morda ne poznajo veljavnih pravil ali ne vedo, kako se pravilno uporabljajo.
This can lead them to make incorrect or unjus­tified declarations.
Zato se lahko zgodi, da predložijo nepra­vilne ali neupravičene izjave o odhodkih.
Moreover, since the beginning of the programming period the Commission has provided regular and early training and guidance to the competent authorities in the Member States.
Poleg tega Komisija od začetka programskega obdobja pristojnim organom v državah članicah zagotavlja redno in pravočasno usposab­ljanje in navodila.
Specific training actions were also foreseen in the Commission Action Plan adopted in February 2008 (COM(2008) 97 final) in that regard and are carried out on a regular basis.
Posebni ukrepi usposabljanja na tem področju, ki se redno izvajajo, so bili predvideni tudi v akcijskem načrtu Komisije, sprejetem februarja 2008 (COM(2008) 97 konč.).
This ensures that expen­diture is committed and paid evenly throughout the period and is not back-loaded in the last year.
To zagotavlja, da se obveznosti za odhodke prevzemajo in plačila izvršujejo enakomerno skozi celotno obdobje, namesto da bi se nakopičili v zadnjem letu.
The Commission is also particularly vigilant that Member States’ management and control systems are effective throughout the imple­mentation period up to closure and imposes financial corrections where necessary.
Poleg tega je Komisija še posebej pozorna, da so upravljavski in kontrolni sistemi držav članic učinkoviti v celotnem obdobju izvajanja do zaključka projektov, ter po potrebi naloži finančne popravke.
As the eligibility period for 2000- 2006 came to an end in 2009, national authorities may have been under pressure to absorb the EU funds committed.
Ker se je obdobje upraviče­nosti za obdobje 2000–2006 leta 2009 izteklo, so lahko bili nacionalni organi pod pritiskom, da izčrpajo sredstva EU, za katera so bile prevzete proračunske obveznosti.
As already stated by the Court in its 2008 Annual Report, this increases the risk that ineligible projects are reimbursed by the EU budget when expenditure which has been found to be ineligible is replaced by new expenditure (‘withdrawal’) without an effective exante verification by the Member State before programme closure ( 7 ).
Kot je Sodišče že navedlo v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 2008, to povečuje tveganje, da se iz proračuna EU izplačajo povračila stroškov za neupravičene projekte, kadar se odhodki, za katere je bilo ugotovljeno, da niso upravičeni, nadomestijo z novimi („umik“), ne da bi država članica pred zaključkom programa uspešno izvedla predhodno preverjanje ( 7 ).
( 6 ) Article 39(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (OJ L 161, 26.6.1999, p.
( 6 ) Člen 39(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1260/1999 (UL L 161, 26.6.1999, str.
1); Articles 91 and 92 of Regulation
1), člena 91 in 92 Uredbe (ES) št. 1083/2006.
(EC) No 1083/2006. ( 7 ) See paragraphs 6.19 and 6.33 of the 2008 Annual Report.
) Glej odstavka 6.19 in 6.33 letnega poročila za leto 2008.
The Commission is actively following up the risk identified in the 2008 annual report of the Court, in particular in the context of the closure of the 20002006 programmes.
Komisija aktivno spremlja tveganja, ugotovljena v letnem poročilu Sodišča za leto 2008, zlasti glede zaključka programov za obdobje 2000–2006.
The risk identified by the Court is inherent to the regulatory length of time for the submission by Member States of compliance assessment reports and audit strategies.
Tveganja, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, so posledica regulativnega roka, v katerem morajo države članice predložiti poročila o ocenah tveganja in revizijske strategije.
The Commission considers that this is a limited risk because the fact that it has not approved management and control systems yet does not mean that such systems, approved at national level, do not comply with requirements and do not function effectively.
4.14 Za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 je prvi bistveni element okvira kontrole za kohezijsko politiko Komisijina odobritev ocen skladnosti (ki so priložene poročilom z opisom upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov) in revizijskih strategij.
Unless and until it has approved the compliance assessments, the Commission does not authorise interim payments to the programme concerned.
Tveganje napak pri odhodkih, ki nastanejo v tem obdobju, je večje.
At the same time, Member States are allowed to start making payments to bene­ficiaries through unapproved systems while awaiting the Commission’s approval to take place. The expenditure taking place during this period is at an increased risk of error.
Komisija meni, da gre za manjše tveganje, saj dejstvo, da še ni odobrila upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov, ne pomeni, da ti sistemi, ki so odobreni na nacionalni ravni, niso skladni z zahtevami in ne delujejo učinkovito.
Mitigating controls are in place and the Structural Funds Direc­torates-General have taken this risk into account in their audit strategy and also drawn this risk to the attention of the audit authorities.
Vzpostavljene so kontrole za omejevanje tveganja; poleg tega so generalni direktorati za strukturne sklade to tveganje upoštevali v njihovi revizijski strategiji ter nanj opozorili tudi revizijske organe.
Each audit authority has to present to the Commission conclusions from the results of audits of representative samples of operations, which cover expenditure declared each year and an annual opinion on the effective functioning of the management and control systems.
Vsak revizijski organ mora Komisiji sporočiti ugotovitve na podlagi rezultatov revizije reprezentativnih vzorcev dejavnosti, ki zajemajo odhodke, prijavljene vsako leto, ter letno predložiti mnenje o uspešnem delovanju upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov.
For the audit of Cohesion, the following specific points should be noted:
Pri revidiranju področja kohezije je treba upoštevati naslednje:
— a sample of 180 interim and final payments was tested.
— preizkušen je bil vzorec s 180 vmesnimi in končnimi plačili.
69 % of these randomly selected payments relate to projects of the 20072013 programming period, and
69 % teh naključno izbranih plačil se nanaša na projekte iz programskega obdobja 2007–2013 in
— The Commission notes that prefinancing, which by definition bears almost no risk, represents one third of its cohesion payments in 2009 (see table 4.1).
— plačila predfinanciranja niso bila vključena v vzorec, ker je za tovrstna plačila značilno zelo nizko tveganje.
— prefinancing payments were not included in the sample because of the very low risk associated with this type of payment.
— Komisija opozarja, da predhodno financiranje, ki po definiciji ne vključuje skoraj nobenega tveganja, predstavlja tretjino njenih kohezijskih plačil v letu 2009 (glej razpredelnico 4.1).
— the compliance with certain key provisions specified in the regulatory framework for 16 OPs of the 20072013 programming period in 13 Member States, and
— zagotavljanje skladnosti 16 operativnih programov iz programskega obdobja 2007–2013 z nekaterimi ključnimi določbami ureditvenega okvira v 13 državah članicah in
— the processing and reporting of recoveries and withdrawals for four OPs and one Community Initiative of the 2000- 2006 programming period in six Member States.
— obdelavo izterjav in umikov ter poročanje o njih za štiri operativne programe in eno pobudo Skupnosti iz programskega obdobja 2000–2006 v šestih državah članicah.
In 2009 this was the case for 36 % ( 8 ) of the 180 audited projects.
Leta 2009 so napake vplivale na 36 % ( 8 ) od 180 revidiranih projektov.
The Commission also underlines that 53 % of the errors are non- quantifiable.
Komisija prav tako poudarja, da 53 % napak ni količinsko oprede­ljivih.
In some cases these compliance errors would have had no impact on the reimbursement of expenditure, even if detected before certifying expenditure to the Commission.
V nekaterih primerih te napake glede skladnosti ne bi imele nobenega vpliva na povračilo odhodkov, tudi če bi bile ugotovljene pred potrditvijo odhodkov Komisiji.
This constitutes a significant improvement compared to previous years (see point 1.26).
Gre za precejšnje izboljšanje v primerjavi s preteklimi leti (glej točko 1.26).
The Commission considers that this improvement reflects the enhanced control provisions in the 20072013 Cohesion regulatory framework, as well as the first impact of the 2008 Commission Action Plan to strengthen its supervisory role for structural actions.
Komisija meni, da to izboljšanje odraža okrepljene določbe glede nadzora v kohezijskem regulativnem okviru 2007–2013, pa tudi prve učinke akcijskega načrta Komisije iz leta 2008 za krepitev njene nadzorne vloge pri strukturnih ukrepih.
The Commission is committed to actively pursue its efforts to reduce the errors even further.
Komisija si bo aktivno prizadevala za nadaljnje zmanjšanje napak.
The Commission considers that in eight ERDF cases affected by a quantifiable error the national authorities had already applied propor­tionate financial corrections before declaring the expenditure to the Commission.
Komisija meni, da so v 8 zadevah ESRR, na katere je vplivala količinsko opredeljiva napaka, nacionalni organi že uporabili soraz­merne finančne popravke, preden so odhodke prijavili Komisiji.
As a result, there is no negative financial impact on the EU budget (see point (d) in box below).
Zato to ni imelo negativnega finančnega učinka na proračun EU (glej točko (d) okvira v nadaljevanju).
They were found in 24 payments to projects audited. The main causes of the eligibility errors were inclusion of costs which are not eligible for reimbursement and serious failures to respect public procurement rules (see the following examples).
Odkrite so bile v 24 plačilih za revidirane projekte in so nastale predvsem zaradi vlaganja zahtevkov za stroške, ki niso upravičeni do povračila, in hujšega nespoštovanja pravil za oddajo javnega naročila (glej naslednje primere).
Possible shortcomings in the implementation of public procurement rules at a national, regional or local level in applying EU law are not strictly related to the implementation of cohesion projects.
Morebitne pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju pravil o javnih naročilih na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni pri uporabi zakonodaje EU niso strogo vezane na izvajanje kohezijskih projektov.
The Commission has taken into account those errors for its risk assessment in its own audit work.
Komisija je te napake upoštevala pri oceni tveganja v okviru lastne revizijske dejavnosti.
It has also taken other steps, such as providing specialised training on public procurement procedures on numerous occasions and issued guidance to programme authorities.
Izvedla je tudi druge ukrepe, kot je zagotavljanje specializiranega usposabljanja o postopkih javnega naročanja ob številnih priložnostih, ter izdala smernice organom, pristojnim za programe.
( 8 ) See Annex 4.1.
( 8 ) Glej Prilogo 4.1.
In 2008 and 2007, the corresponding figures were 43 % and 54 %, respectively.
Leta 2008 so napake vplivale na 43 %, leta 2007 pa na 54 % revidiranih projektov.
( 9 ) The error rates are calculated based on a representative statistical sample drawn from interim and final payments for 2009 (23 billion euro) with a 95 % confidence level as indicated in Table 4.1.
( 9 ) Stopnje napak so izračunane na podlagi reprezentativnega statistič­nega vzorca vmesnih in končnih plačil za leto 2009 (23 milijard