natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
During the last three years, an average of 580 preparatory documents were made public each year, pursuant to Article 11(6) of Annex II to the Council's Rules of Procedure.
V zadnjih treh letih se je v skladu s členom 11(6) Priloge II poslovnika Sveta vsako leto javno objavilo povprečno 580 pripravljalnih dokumentov.
The monthly summary can be consulted on the Council's website http://www.consilium.europa.eu under the heading "Documents" – "Summary of Council acts".
Mesečni pregled je na voljo na spletnem mestu Sveta http://www.consilium.europa.eu pod naslovom "Dokumenti" – "Povzetki aktov Sveta".
As in previous years, in 2007 the Council Secretariat ran a series of training sessions12for Council staff responsible for document production in order to familiarise them with the procedures and practice to be followed as regards public access to documents.
Sekretariat Sveta je tako kot v preteklih letih tudi v letu 2007 izvedel vrsto usposabljanj12za osebje Sveta, odgovorno za pripravo dokumentov, da bi se seznanilo s postopki in prakso, ki naj se uporabljajo v zvezi z dostopom javnosti do dokumentov.
In 2007, the "Transparency, access to documents and information to the public" Unit of the General Secretariat of the Council (DG F) had a staff of 19, allocated as follows:
Leta 2007 je bilo v enoti generalnega sekretariata Sveta "Preglednost, dostop javnosti do dokumentov in informacij" (DG F) 19 zaposlenih, ki so bili razporejeni na naslednji način:
5 AD and 8 AST staff 6 AST staff.
5 uradnikov AD in 8 uradnikov AST 6 uradnikov AST.
The staff of the "Information to the public" section handles the requests for information from members of the public under the Code of good administrative behaviour for the General Secretariat of the Council13.
Osebje službe "Informacije za javnost" prošnje za informacije, ki jih dobi od posameznikov, obravnava v skladu s kodeksom dobrega upravnega obnašanja generalnega sekretariata Sveta13.
In 2007, the service dealt with 8 322 requests for information from the public, of which 7 252 were forwarded by email and 1 070 were sent by letter.
Leta 2007 je služba obravnavala 8322 prošenj javnosti za informacije, od tega jih je bilo 7252 poslano po elektronski pošti, 1070 pa v pismu.
In all, three training sessions were organised during the reference period (in February, May and September 2007); in addition specific briefing meetings were held in June and October 2007 between Transparency Department staff, members of the GSC's various departments concerned and members of the Council's preparatory bodies.
Vsega skupaj so bila v referenčnem obdobju organizirana tri usposabljanja (februarja, maja in septembra 2007); poleg tega so med osebjem Urada za preglednost, člani različnih zadevnih služb generalnega sekretariata Sveta in člani pripravljalnih teles Sveta junija in oktobra 2007 potekali posebni informativni sestanki.
Decision of the Secretary-General of the Council/High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy of 25 June 2001 on a code of good administrative behaviour for the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union and its staff in their professional relations with the public, OJ C 189, 5.7.2001, p. 1.
Sklep generalnega sekretarja/visokega predstavnika za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko z dne 25. junija 2001 o kodeksu dobrega upravnega obnašanja generalnega sekretariata Sveta Evropske unije in njegovega osebja v poklicnih odnosih z javnostjo, UL C 189, 5.7.2001, str. 1.
Requests from the public for access to Council documents are processed in the initial phase by the General Secretariat of the Council.
Prošnje javnosti za dostop do dokumentov Sveta v začetni fazi obravnava generalni sekretariat Sveta.
In the event of a total or partial refusal of access by the General Secretariat of the Council to a document, the applicant may submit a confirmatory application asking the institution to reconsider its position.
Če generalni sekretariat Sveta popolnoma ali delno zavrne dostop do dokumenta, lahko prosilec vloži potrdilno prošnjo, v kateri institucijo prosi, da svoje stališče ponovno preuči.
In the event of a total or partial refusal of a confirmatory application, the applicant may lodge a complaint with the European Ombudsman and/or institute proceedings before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities.
V primeru popolne ali delne zavrnitve potrdilne prošnje lahko prosilec vloži pritožbo pri evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic in/ali sproži postopek pred Sodiščem prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti.
The Annex to this report provides statistics on public access to Council documents for the last five years (2003-2007).
V prilogi k temu poročilu so navedeni statistični podatki glede dostopa javnosti do dokumentov Sveta za zadnjih pet let (2003-2007).
During the reference period the Council received 1 964 requests from the public for access to a total of 7 809 documents.
V referenčnem obdobju je Svet s strani javnosti prejel 1964 prošenj za dostop do skupno 7809 dokumentov.
The number of documents disclosed in full or in part (following initial or confirmatory applications) totalled 6 138 in 2007.
Skupno število dokumentov, v celoti ali delno razkritih (po vložitvi začetnih ali potrdilnih prošenj), je leta 2007 znašalo 6138.
As the statistics for Internet consultation of the public register of Council documents demonstrate, the Internet register continues to be an important research tool for citizens wishing to keep close track of the activities of the European Union.
Kot kaže statistika internetnih poizvedb po dokumentih Sveta v javnem registru, internetni register še naprej ostaja pomembno raziskovalno orodje za državljane, ki želijo podrobno spremljati dejavnosti Evropske unije.
This is borne out by an 21 % increase in the number of visits (a number which has risen for five years in succession).
To dejstvo podpira skoraj 21 % povečanje števila obiskov (število se je povečalo že peto zaporedno leto).
Initial applications came mainly from students and researchers (40 %).
Začetne prošnje so pošiljali predvsem študenti in raziskovalci (40 %).
Lawyers (8,8 %), industry and commerce and pressure groups (14,2 %) were also high on the list of social and professional categories represented.
Visoko na seznamu zastopanih družbenih in poklicnih kategorij so bili tudi pravniki (8,8 %), predstavniki industrije in trgovine ter interesne skupine (14,2 %).
Since applicants are not required to give their identity or provide reasons for their applications, which are usually sent by e-mail, the occupations of a significant proportion (13,2 %) of them is unknown.
Glede na to, da prosilcem ni treba razkriti svoje identitete niti navesti vzrokov, zakaj pošiljajo prošnje – te navadno prispejo prek elektronske pošte – poklic znatnega deleža (13,2 %) prosilcev ni znan.
Most confirmatory applications also originated from students and researchers (56,2 %).
Tudi večino potrdilnih prošenj so poslali študenti in raziskovalci (56,2 %).
While 18,7 % of the confirmatory requests for access in 2007 were submitted by journalists, this category of applicants only accounted for 2,9 % of the requests at the initial stage.
V letu 2007 so 18,7 % potrdilnih prošenj za dostop vložili novinarji, kljub temu pa je ta kategorija prosilcev predstavljala le 2,9 % prošenj v začetni fazi.
This is mainly due to the fact that the institutions' public document registers represent only one of several possible sources of information for the press.
Razlog za to je predvsem dejstvo, da so za novinarje javni registri institucij le eden izmed več možnih virov informacij.
Moreover, the vast majority of journalists are mainly interested in the latest news.
Poleg tega veliko večino novinarjev zanimajo predvsem zadnje novice.
It is therefore not surprising that the few applications for access from journalists came in the main from the field of investigative journalism and were thus similar to applications from academics.
Zato ne preseneča dejstvo, da je tistih nekaj prošenj za dostop, ki so jih poslali novinarji, prispelo predvsem s področja raziskovalnega novinarstva, zato so bile podobne prošnjam iz akademskih krogov.
As regards the geographical distribution of applicants, the majority of initial applications came from Belgium (26,4 %), Germany (16 %) and the United Kingdom (9,5 %).
Kar zadeva geografsko zastopanost prosilcev, je večina začetnih prošenj prispela iz Belgije (26,4 %), Nemčije (16 %) in Združenega kraljestva (9,5 %).
Applications originating from non-EU countries represented 8 % of the total.
Prošnje iz držav, ki niso članice EU, so predstavljale 8 % vseh prošenj.
Confirmatory applications came mainly from Belgium (37,5 %) and the United Kingdom (25 %)14.
Potrdilne prošnje so prispele predvsem iz Belgije (37,5 %) in Združenega kraljestva (25 %)14.
The relatively high number of initial and confirmatory applications originating from Belgium is explained by the fact that several multinational companies and international law firms, as well as numerous associations representing various economic and industrial sectors at European level have their headquarters in Brussels.
Sorazmerno visoko število začetnih in potrdilnih prošenj iz Belgije pojasnjuje dejstvo, da ima veliko multinacionalnih družb in mednarodnih odvetniških družb kot tudi veliko združenj, ki zastopajo razne gospodarske in industrijske sektorje na evropski ravni, svoj sedež v Bruslju.
Fields covered by applications
Področja, na katera se nanašajo prošnje
As regards the fields covered by the applications, the interest in justice and home affairs remained high (26,7 %)15.
Kar zadeva področja, na katera se nanašajo prošnje, je bilo še vedno veliko zanimanja na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev (26,7 %)15.
This was followed, in descending order, by applications for documents on external relations and the CFSP (18,1 %), the environment (8,2 %), agriculture and fisheries (6,8 %) and defence and military matters (6 %).
Temu so v padajočem vrstnem redu sledile prošnje za dokumente s področij zunanjih odnosov in SZVP (18,1 %), okolja (8,2 %), kmetijstva in ribištva (6,8 %) ter obrambne in vojaške zadeve (6 %).
Applicants' interest in justice and home affairs (26,7 % of applications in 2007 as against 24,5 % in 2006) remained fairly steady, whereas applications concerning the CFSP (18,1 % in 2007 as against 14,3 % in
Zanimanje prosilcev za področje pravosodja in notranjih zadev je ostalo razmeroma stalno (26,7 % prošenj leta 2007 za razliko od 24,5 % leta 2006), medtem ko se je število prošenj močno povečalo na področjih SZVP (18,1 % leta 2007 za razliko od 14,3 % leta 2006) in EVOP (6 % leta 2007 za razliko
It should, however, be noted that while applications relating to "conventional" legislative documents concerning, for example, the internal market, dropped again, down to 2,9 % in 2007 (as against 16,3 % in 2003 and 14,2 % in 2004), that is not necessarily indicative of a lack of interest in that field on the part of the public but is rather due to the fact that a considerable number of legislative documents are made accessible through the public register of Council documents as soon as they are circulated.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba opozoriti, da je kljub ponovnemu zmanjšanju povpraševanja za dostop do "klasičnih" zakonodajnih dokumentov v letu 2007, npr. v zvezi z notranjim trgom na 2,9 % (za razliko od 16,3 % leta 2003 in 14,2 % leta 2004), to še ne pomeni nujno manjšega zanimanja javnosti za to področje, ampak je bolj posledica dejstva, da je precejšnje število zakonodajnih dokumentov dostopno prek javnega registra dokumentov Sveta, takoj po njihovi objavi.
In 2007 a total of 108 343 documents (i.e. 67,2 % of the 161 121 produced and listed in the register during the year) were thus circulated as public documents.
Skupno število dokumentov, ki so bili objavljeni kot javni dokumenti v letu 2007, je 108.343 (tj. 67,2 % od 161.121 pripravljenih dokumentov, navedenih v registru v tem letu).
In 2006, most confirmatory applications came from the United Kingdom (22,9 %) Germany (22,8 %) and Belgium (17,1 %).
Leta 2006 je večina potrdilnih prošenj prispela iz Združenega kraljestva (22,9 %), Nemčije (22,8 %) in Belgije (17,1 %).
This figure has been increasing steadily over the last three years, from 20,1 % in 2004 to 22,5 % in 2005 and 24,5 % in 2006, reaching 26,8 % in 2007.
Ta številka je v zadnjih treh letih stalno naraščala, z 20,1 % v letu 2004 na 22,5 % v letu 2005 in 24,5 % v letu 2006, leta 2007 pa je dosegla 26,8 %.
Of the documents disclosed in full following application for access, 24,8 % related to justice and home affairs, 18,6 % to the CFSP and 10,5 % to the ESDP.
Od dokumentov, razkritih v celoti po prejemu prošnje za dostop, se jih je 24,8 % nanašalo na pravosodje in notranje zadeve, 18,6 % na SZVP in 10,5 % na EVOP.
Of the total number of documents disclosed (in full or in part), 26,4 % concerned justice and home affairs, 18,4 % the CFSP and 9,6 % the ESDP.
Od skupnega števila dokumentov (razkritih v celoti ali deloma) je 26,4 % dokumentov zadevalo pravosodje in notranje zadeve, 18,4 % SZVP, 9,6 % pa EVOP.
Number of documents examined and refusals of access
Število preučenih dokumentov in zavrnitve dostopa
During the reference period, the General Secretariat examined 7 809 documents, 6 123 of which were made available in the initial stage (reply supplied by the General Secretariat on behalf of the Council).
V referenčnem obdobju je generalni sekretariat preučil 7809 dokumentov, od katerih je bilo 6123 dostopnih v začetni fazi (odgovor je v imenu Sveta poslal generalni sekretariat).
18 confirmatory applications were made in respect of 30 documents, as a result of which the Council decided to disclose an additional 15 documents (6 in full and 9 in part).
Za 30 dokumentov je bilo vloženih 18 potrdilnih prošenj, zaradi česar se je Svet odločil razkriti dodatnih 15 dokumentov (6 v celoti in 9 delno).
Of the 7 809 documents examined during the reference period, 1 671 were therefore refused (initial and confirmatory applications combined), which is an access rate of 66,7 % (documents requested and fully disclosed) or 78,9 % if documents to which partial access was granted are also taken into account.
Izmed 7809 preučenih dokumentov je bil v referenčnem obdobju za 1671 dokumentov dostop zavrnjen (v začetni in potrdilni fazi skupaj), kar pomeni delež odobrenih dostopov v višini 66,7 % (zahtevanih dokumentov, objavljenih v celoti) oziroma 78,9 %, če se upoštevajo dokumenti, za katere se je odobril delni dostop.
With regard to the initial applications, the grounds for refusal most frequently invoked were the protection of the decisionmaking process, which accounted for nearly two fifths of all refusals (38 %), followed by the protection of the public interest as regards international relations (15,1 %), public security (13,3 %), and defence and military matters (2,3 %).
Pri začetnih prošnjah je bil najpogosteje navedeni razlog za zavrnitev varstvo postopka odločanja, ki je bil naveden pri skoraj dveh petinah vseh zavrnitev (38 %), sledijo mu varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva mednarodne odnose (15,1 %), javno varnost (13,3 %), ter obrambne in vojaške zadeve (2,3 %).
In 30,2 % of cases several grounds for refusal were invoked: thus protection of the public interest as regards public security was often given in conjunction with protection of the public interest as regards international relations (20,4 %), while the protection of the decisionmaking process of the institution was regularly mentioned together with the protection of the public interest as regards international relations, including negotiations on trade, enlargement, etc. (5,4 %).
Pri 30,2 % primerov je bilo navedenih več razlogov za zavrnitev: tako je bilo varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva javno varnost, pogosto navedeno v povezavi z varstvom javnega interesa, kar zadeva mednarodne odnose (20,4 %), varstvo postopka odločanja institucije pa je bilo redno navedeno skupaj z varstvom javnega interesa, kar zadeva mednarodne odnose, vključno s pogajanji o trgovini, širitvi itd. (5,4 %).
As for the confirmatory applications, protection of the public interest as regards international relations was invoked as grounds for 20 % of the refusals in 2007 (14 % in 2006), while the protection of the public interest as regards public security was invoked in 6,7 % of cases (37,2 % in 2006).
Pri potrdilnih prošnjah je bilo varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva mednarodne odnose, navedeno kot razlog za 20 % zavrnitev leta 2007 (14 % leta 2006), varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva javno varnost, pa je bilo navedeno v 6,7 % primerov (37, 2 % leta 2006).
In 33,3 % of the cases, several different reasons for refusals were given, such as protection of the public interest as regards public security in conjunction with protection of the public interest as regards international relations.
V 33,3 % primerov je bilo navedenih več različnih razlogov za zavrnitev, npr. varstvo javnega interesa, kar zadeva javno varnost, v povezavi z varstvom javnega interesa, kar zadeva mednarodne odnose.
The protection of court proceedings and legal advice (exception provided for in the second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001) was invoked as grounds in the initial phase in a mere 0,8 % of refusals in 2007 (2 % in 2006).
Varstvo sodnih postopkov in pravnih nasvetov (izjema, predvidena v drugi alinei člena 4(2) Uredbe št. 1049/2001) je bilo navedeno kot razlog v začetni fazi pri zgolj 0,8 % zavrnitev v letu 2007 (2 % v 2006).
It was not invoked at all at the confirmatory stage during the period under consideration, whereas it had been the grounds for 4,6 % of refusals in 2006.
Ta razlog v potrdilni fazi v obravnavanem obdobju sploh ni bil naveden, medtem ko je bil leta 2006 naveden za 4,6 % zavrnitev.
While this exception is not the Council's most frequently invoked grounds for refusal, its importance for the proper functioning and effectiveness of the institution's work should nevertheless be emphasised17.
Čeprav ta izjema ni najpogosteje navedeni razlog Sveta za zavrnitev, je vendarle treba izpostaviti njen pomen za pravilno in učinkovito delovanje institucije17.
The practice is as far as possible to grant partial access, in accordance with Article 4(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, to documents containing Council Legal Service opinions and contributions by the Legal Service to the proceedings of the Council and its preparatory bodies.
V praksi se, kolikor je mogoče pogosto, v skladu s členom 4(6) Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 odobri delni dostop do dokumentov, ki vsebujejo mnenja pravne službe Sveta in prispevke pravne službe k postopkom Sveta in njegovih pripravljalnih teles.
On the basis of case-law established over several years18, and confirmed in 2004 by the Court of First Instance in its judgment in the Turco case19, the Council considers that the independent advice provided for the Council by the Legal Service allows the Council to ensure that its acts comply with Community law and to pursue the discussion on the legal aspects of a dossier.
Na podlagi večletne sodne prakse18, in kakor jo je leta 2004 potrdilo Sodišče prve stopnje v svoji sodbi v zadevi Turco19, Svet meni, da lahko zaradi neodvisnega svetovanja, ki mu ga nudi pravna služba, zagotavlja, da so njegova dejanja v skladu s pravom Skupnosti, in razpravlja o pravnih vidikih posameznih primerov.
If the Council were to lose that instrument, the efficiency of its work would be compromised.
Če bi Svet izgubil ta instrument, bi bila uspešnost njegovega delovanja ogrožena.
This is why it is in the public interest that the Council should have access to impartial legal advice.
Zato je v interesu javnosti, da ima Svet dostop do nepristranskega pravnega svetovanja.
In this connection, see the order of the Court of First Instance of 3 March 1998 in Case T-610/97 R, Carlsen and others v. Council, ECR 1998, p.
V zvezi s tem glej odredbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 3. marca 1998 v zadevi T-610/97 R, Carlsen in drugi proti Svetu, PSES 1998, str.
II-485, paragraphs 45 to 47, and its ruling of 8 November 2000 in case T-44/97, Ghignone and others v. Council, ECR 2000, p.
II-485, odstavki 45 do 47, in njegovo odločbo z dne 8. novembra 2000 v zadevi T-44/97, Ghignone in drugi proti Svetu, PSES 2000, str.
This case-law was cited by the Court in its order of 23 October 2002 in case C-445/00, Austria v. Council, paragraph 12.
To sodno prakso je Sodišče navedlo v svoji odredbi z dne 23. oktobra 2002 v primeru C-445/00, Avstrija proti Svetu, odstavek 12.
See judgment by the Court of First Instance of 23 November 2004 in Case T-84/03 Maurizio Turco v. Council (not yet published in the ECR), paragraphs 62 et seq.
Glej sodbo Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 23. novembra 2004 v zadevi T-84/03 Maurizio Turco proti Svetu (še ni objavljena v PSES), odstavek 62 in nadaljnji odstavki.
This judgement is currently under appeal (Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P).
Na to sodbo je trenutno vložena pritožba (zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P).
When the Commission's decided, in November 2005, to launch the so-called "European Transparency Initiative", it included a review of Regulation 1049/2001 as one of a series of measures aiming at further increasing openness and transparency at the European level.
Novembra 2005 se je Komisija odločila sprožiti tako imenovano "Evropsko pobudo o preglednosti", ki je kot enega izmed vrste ukrepov za dodatno povečanje odprtosti in preglednosti na evropski ravni vključevala pregled Uredbe 1049/2001.
Following this decision, the Commission published, on 18 April 2007, a Green Paper on public access to documents20, in which it took stock of the existing rules governing the public right of access to documents and their implementation, while taking due account of the case-law established by the Court of First Instance as regards Regulation 1049/2001.
Po tej odločitvi je Komisija 18. aprila 2007 objavila Zeleno knjigo o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov20, v kateri je ocenila obstoječa pravila, ki urejajo pravico javnosti do dostopa do dokumentov, in njihovo izvajanje, ter pri tem ustrezno upoštevala sodno prakso, ki jo je glede Uredbe 1049/2001 uveljavilo Sodišče prve stopnje.
In the Green Paper, the Commission set out some options for improving the legislation, notably as regards transparency in the legislative process, harmonisation of the rules on access to documents with the rules on access to environmental information and the establishment of guidelines which will enable the institutions to more easily strike the balance between the principle of transparency and the protection of personal data and/or between transparency and the protection of commercial and economic interests.
Komisija v Zeleni knjigi podaja nekatere možnosti za izboljšanje zakonodaje, predvsem glede preglednosti zakonodajnega postopka, uskladitve pravil o dostopu do dokumentov s pravili o dostopu do informacij o okolju in glede oblikovanja smernic, ki bodo institucijam omogočile, da bodo lažje dosegle ravnotežje med načeli preglednosti in načeli varstva osebnih podatkov in/ali med preglednostjo ter varstvom poslovnih in ekonomskih interesov.
In addition, the Commission pointed to a number of practical measures aimed at offering members of the public better access to the documents of the EU institutions.
Poleg tega je Komisija opozorila na vrsto praktičnih ukrepov, katerih namen je javnosti zagotoviti boljši dostop do dokumentov institucij EU.
The publication of the Green Paper moreover marked the launching of a public consultation on the review of Regulation 1049/2001.
Objava Zelene knjige je poleg tega predstavljala začetek javnega posvetovanja o pregledu Uredbe 1049/2001.