natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Article 82 EC reads as follows: which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.’
V členu 82 ES je določeno: trgovinske običaje nimajo nikakr�ne zveze s predmetom tak�nih pogodb.“
Article 86 EC provides as follows:
V členu 86 ES je določeno:
‘Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market in so far as it may affect trade between Member States.
„Kot nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom je prepovedana vsaka zloraba prevladujočega položaja enega ali več podjetij na skupnem trgu ali njegovem znatnem delu, kolikor bi lahko prizadela trgovino med državami članicami.
Such abuse may, in particular, consist in:
Tak�na zloraba je zlasti:
‘(1) In the case of public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights, Member States shall neither enact nor maintain in force any measure contrary to the rules contained in this Treaty, in particular to those rules provided for in Article 12 and Articles 81 to 89.
„(1) Države članice glede javnih podjetij in podjetij, katerim so odobrile posebne ali izključne pravice, ne smejo sprejeti ali ohraniti v veljavi ukrepov, ki so v nasprotju s pravili iz te pogodbe, zlasti iz člena 12 in členov 81 do 89.
(a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions;
(a) neposredno ali posredno določanje nepo�tenih nakupnih ali prodajnih cen ali drugih nepo�tenih pogojev poslovanja;
(b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers;
(b) omejevanje proizvodnje, trgov ali tehničnega razvoja na �kodo potro�nikov;
(c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage;
(2) Podjetja, poobla�čena za opravljanje storitev splo�nega gospodarskega pomena, oziroma podjetja, ki imajo značaj dohodkovnega monopola, ravnajo po pravilih iz te pogodbe, zlasti po pravilih o konkurenci, kolikor uporaba tak�nih pravil pravno ali dejansko ne ovira izvajanja posebnih nalog, ki so jim dodeljena.
The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Community.
(c) uporaba neenakih pogojev za primerljive posle z drugimi trgovskimi partnerji, ki slednje postavlja v podrejen konkurenčni položaj;
(d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations
(d) sklepanje pogodb, ki sopogodbenikom narekujejo sprejetje dodatnih obveznosti, ki po svoji naravi ali glede na
(International Historic Vehicle Federation) (FIVA) …’
B – Nacionalno pravo starodobnih vozil Mednarodno zvezo starodobnih vozil (FIVA) […]“
Article 49 of Greek Law No 2696/1999 5(the ‘Road Traffic Code’), in the version of
V členu 49 gr�kega zakona �t.
2000, reads as follows:
2696/1999 5(v nadaljevanju: zakon o cestnem prometu) v različici, ki je veljala leta 2000, je določeno:
Also, Article 134(8) of Greek Law No 2725/1999 6 provides as follows:
Nadalje je v členu 134(8) gr�kega zakona �t. 2725/1999 6 med drugim določeno tole:
‘(1) Competitions involving vehicles drawn by animals, animals, bicycles, cars, threewheeled vehicles, motorcycles or mopeds on public or private roads or spaces are allowed to take place only after authorisation has been granted.
„(1) Dirke z vprežnimi vozili, živalmi, kolesi, motornimi vozili, trikolesnimi vozili, motorji in kolesi s pomožnim motorjem na javnih in zasebnih poteh ali prostorih se smejo izvajati samo po pridobitvi ustreznega dovoljenja.
‘Competitions involving mechanically-oper-ated vehicles and related sporting disciplines (car, formula, kart, bike and so forth) constitute a sporting activity which is governed by the provisions of this Law …’
„Dirke motornih vozil in ustrezne tekmovalne kategorije (motorno vozilo, formula, kart, motorno kolo itd.) so �portna dejavnost, ki sodi v okvir tega zakona …“ predvideno v prvem
ELPA’s yearbook of motorcycling events (2000), which was issued by ETHEAM, contains its circulars for 2000.
Letopis motociklističnih dirk ELPE (2000), ki ga je izdal ETHEAM, vsebuje okrožnico za leto 2000.
They provide, inter alia, information on the supporting documents to be produced when applying for authorisation to hold an event and the competition conditions which must be submitted, as well as on fees and other financial matters.
V njej so med drugim informacije o potrebnih potrdilih za pridobitev dovoljenj za dirke in o tekmovalnih pogojih, nadalje o pristojbinah in drugih finančnih vidikih.
Also published in the yearbook are the national rules governing the sport of motorcycling, known as the EAKM, 7 which contain the following provisions:
Poleg tega so v letopisu objavljena nacionalna pravila motociklističnega �porta, tako imenovana EAKM, 7 ki med drugim vsebujejo te določbe: c) za vse dirke motornih vozil, trikolesnih vozil, motorjev in koles s pomožnim motorjem minister za javni red ali službe, ki jih pooblasti, v soglasju s pravno osebo, ki v Grčiji uradno zastopa Mednarodno avtomobilsko zvezo (FIA), Mednarodno motociklistično zvezo (FIM) in za dirke
must ensure that for the sports meeting insurance is in place that covers his own liability and that of manufacturers, riders, passengers … in the event of accidents and of loss or injury to third parties during the event and during practice.’
zavarovanje za tekmovalno prireditev; k temu sodi njegova odgovornost ter odgovornost konstruktorjev, voznikov, sovoznikov … pri nesrečah in �kodah, ki nastanejo tretjim osebam med dirko in med poskusnimi vožnjami.“
Every sports meeting which includes events in respect of ETHEAM/ELPA championships, cups or prizes may be combined with the commercial promotion of a sponsor referred to in the event’s title or secondary title only after ETHEAM/ELPA has given its consent.
Vsaka �portna prireditev, bodisi prvenstvo, pokal ali nagradno tekmovanje, pod okriljem ETHEAM/ELPE sme biti povezana s komercialno reklamo sponzorja, navedenega v nazivu ali v podnazivu tekmovanja, le če je ETHEAM/ELPA s tem sogla�ala.
III — Facts and main proceedings
III – Dejansko stanje in postopek v glavni stvari
ELPA, the Greek automobile and touring club, is the official representative of the FIM in Greece.
ELPA, gr�ki avtomobilistični in potovalni klub, je uradni zastopnik Mednarodne motociklistične zveze (FIM) v Grčiji.
According to the information from the referring court, ELPA is a non-profit-making association which, inter alia, organises motor sports competitions and, in this connection, also concludes sponsorship, advertising and insurance agreements.
Po podatkih predložitvenega sodi�ča je ELPA nepridobitno dru�tvo, ki med drugim prireja tekmovanja na področju motociklističnega �porta in v zvezi s tem tudi sklepa sponzorske pogodbe ter pogodbe o ogla�evanju in zavarovalne pogodbe.
During sports meetings, advertising on riders and motorcycles is permitted.
V času trajanja �portnih prireditev sme biti na voznikih in motorjih pritrjena reklama.
Advertising is allowed on the helmet to the extent that it is feasible without affecting the helmet’s technical characteristics.
Na čeladi sme biti reklama pritrjena na celotni povr�ini, če se tehnične lastnosti čelade ne poslab�ajo.
In speed events and motocross within the framework of ETHEAM/ELPA championships, cups and prizes, the organisers do not have the right to require a rider, passenger or motorcycle to advertise any product, unless they obtain the competitor’s consent.
Pri hitrostnih in motokrosnih dirkah v okviru prvenstev, pokalov ali nagradnih tekmovanj ETHEAM/ELPE organizatorji ne smejo predpisati, da se na voznike, sovoznike ali motorje pritrdi reklama za določen proizvod, razen če se udeleženec strinja.
When an ETHEAM/ELPA sponsorship agreement is in force, riders, passengers and motorcycles are obliged to observe the terms of that agreement.
Če obstaja sponzorska pogodba z ETHEAM/ELPO, morajo vozniki, sovozniki ali motorji izpolnjevati pogoje te pogodbe.
ELPA has entrusted the supervision of national racing events and the issue of motorcycling sports licences throughout Greece to the National Motorcycle-Racing Committee (ETHEAM) established by it.
Nadzor nacionalnih dirkalnih prireditev in izvajanje �portnih pooblastil na področju motociklističnega �porta v celotni Grčiji je ELPA zaupala nacionalni komisiji za motociklistične dirke (ETHEAM), katere ustanoviteljica je.
The organiser, either directly or through the supervisory authority,
Prireditelj mora neposredno ali prek nadzornega organa zagotoviti
MOTOE is a non-profit-making motor sports association independent of ELPA, whose activity likewise includes the organisation of motorcycling events in Greece.
MOTOE je od ELPE neodvisna nepridobitna motociklistična zveza, njena dejavnost pa zajema tudi prirejanje motociklističnih dirk v Grčiji.
A number of regional motorcycling clubs are members of it.
Med njene člane spada več regionalnih motociklističnih klubov.
On 13 February 2000, MOTOE applied to the Greek Ministry of Public Order for authorisation to hold a number of motorcycling events.
MOTOE je 13. februarja 2000 pri gr�kem ministrstvu za javni red zaprosil za izdajo dovoljenja za izvedbo niza motociklističnih dirk.
A programme of the planned events was enclosed with the application, according to which a total of 28 events of various motorcycling clubs, all of them MOTOE members, were to be held between 26 March 2000 and 3 December 2000.
Pro�nji je bil priložen program načrtovanih dirk. V skladu z njim naj bi v obdobju od 26. marca 2000 do 3. decembra 2000 priredili 28 tekmovanj različnih motociklističnih klubov, ki so vsi člani MOTOE.
On 8 February 2000, the programme was sent to ELPA so that it could give the consent required for authorisation of the events.
Program je bil 8. februarja 2000 posredovan ELPI, da bi lahko izdala za odobritev dirk potrebno soglasje.
In accordance with the legislation in force, championships, cups and prizes are organised by ETHEAM, on the authorisation of ELPA, the only legal representative of the FIM.
V skladu z veljavnim pravom prireja ETHEAM prvenstva, pokale in nagradna tekmovanja po pooblastilu ELPE, ki je edini zakoniti zastopnik FIM v Grčiji.
By letter of 16 March 2000, ELPA asked MOTOE to submit specific rules for each planned event at least two months before it was due to take place, so as to allow scrutiny of the race officials, the route or track for the race, the safety measures that would be taken and, generally, all the conditions for the safe running of the event.
ELPA je z dopisom z dne 16. marca 2000 MOTOE pozvala, naj za vsako načrtovano tekmo najmanj dva meseca pred načrtovano prireditvijo predloži posebno ureditev zaradi nadzora oseb, tekmovalne proge ali steze, da bi se omogočilo ustrezne varnostne ukrepe in na splo�no vse pogoje za varno izvedbo dirke.
The organising clubs were also asked to lodge with ETHEAM a copy of their statutes.
Nadalje je ELPA zahtevala, da morajo klubi prireditelji deponirati kopije svojih statutov pri ETHEAM.
If an entity or club which satisfies the necessary requirements for the organising and holding of events wishes a specific cup or prize to be announced, it must approach ETHEAM and submit the announcement to it.
Če želi prireditelj ali klub, ki izpolnjuje za organizacijo in izvedbo dirke potrebne pogoje, razpisati pokal ali posebno nagrado, se mora obrniti na ETHEAM in predložiti zadevni razpis.
ETHEAM, after assessing the terms of the proposed announcement, makes a decision, and defines the conditions for holding the event, always in accordance with the international and national rules.
Po preveritvi predlaganih razpisnih pogojev sprejme ETHEAM sklep, v katerem določi pogoje za izvedbo tekmovanja ob spo�tovanju nacionalnih in mednarodnih pravil.
A cup or prize must involve events of a similar kind, for example scramble only or enduro only.
Pokal ali nagradno tekmovanje sme obsegati samo tekme iste vrste, npr. samo ‚scramble‘ ali samo ‚enduro‘.
Other isolated activities which are not included in the championships, cups and prizes already announced can be classified only as friendly events.
Druge posamezne prireditve, ki niso izvedene v okviru prvenstev, pokalov ali nagradnih tekmovanj, so lahko označene le kot prijateljska tekmovanja.
Subsequently, by letter of 5 May 2000, MOTOE applied to the Ministry of Public Order for authorisation to hold six races in the period from 9 July to 26 November 2000 and enclosed with that application the rules relating to the planned conduct of the events and copies of the organising clubs’ statutes.
Nato je MOTOE pri ministrstvu za javni red z dopisom z dne 5. maja 2000 zaprosil za odobritev �estih dirk v obdobju od 9. julija 2000 do 26. novembra 2000 in tej vlogi priložil ureditve v zvezi z načrtovanim potekom dirk ter prepise statutov klubov prirediteljev.
By letter of 20 May 2000, that application, together with its enclosures, was in turn forwarded to ELPA for a declaration of consent.
Z dopisom z dne 20. maja 2000 je ministrstvo za javni red to vlogo skupaj s prilogami zaradi izdaje soglasja spet posredovalo ELPI.
It claimed that the (in its opinion, unlawful) tacit rejection of its application for authorisation to hold motorcycling events had caused it non-material harm because its reputation and credibility in the eyes of its members, Greek motorcyclists and the general public had been damaged.
MOTOE te, po njegovem mnenju nezakonite, zavrnitve predlaganega dovoljenja za izvedbo motociklističnih dirk z molkom naj bi mu nastala nepremoženjska �koda zaradi zmanj�anja njegovega ugleda in verodostojnosti nasproti njegovim članom, gr�kim motoristom in splo�ni javnosti.
MOTOE submitted that Article 49 of the Road Traffic Code infringes the principle of impartiality on the part of the administrative authorities contained in the Greek constitution as well as Articles 82 EC and 86 EC.
MOTOE je zatrjeval, da je člen 49 zakona o cestnem prometu v nasprotju z v gr�ki ustavi vsebovanim načelom nepristranskosti upravnih organov ter s členoma 82 ES in 86 ES.
ELPA intervened in those proceedings in support of the Greek State.
ELPA je vstopila v ta pravni spor kot intervenient na strani gr�ke države.
In order for it to be possible to grant the consent for the organisation of an event, even within the framework of a cup or prize, each organiser who has taken on one of the events which will be included in the particu- lar cup or prize must satisfy the requirements laid down in the National Motorcycle Competition Code and ETHEAM’s circulars.
Soglasje za prireditev dirke tudi v okviru pokala ali nagradnega tekmovanja se lahko izda le, če vsak prireditelj, ki je pristojen za eno od prireditev v okviru določenega pokala ali nagradnega tekmovanja, izpolnjuje pogoje nacionalnega kodeksa za motociklistične dirke ali okrožnic ETHEAM.
Finally, it must be understood that, when the announcement of additional events is requested in the course of the sporting year, the dates requested must not affect the dates already scheduled, and this must be in the interests of both the racers and the organisers.
Končno je samoumevno, da v primeru vloge za razpis dodatnih dirk med prireditvenim letom želeni termin ne sme vplivati na že predvidene tekme, kar je v interesu udeležencev in organizatorjev.
In light of the foregoing, ETHEAM is at your service for discussion of the possibility of announcing a cup or prize in accordance with this year’s national rules for motorcycling events, and awaits your programme of events for 2001 so that those events may also be included in the annual programme.
V takih okoli�činah je ETHEAM na voljo za pogovor z Vami o možnosti razpisa pokala ali nagradnega tekmovanja v skladu z nacionalnimi pravili za motociklistične dirke v tem letu in pričakuje Va� tekmovalni program za leto 2001 za vključitev v letni program.
Your programme must be lodged with ETHEAM/ELPA no later than 15 September 2000.’
Va� program mora biti vložen pri ETHEAM/ELPI najkasneje 15. septembra 2000.“
MOTOE’s action was dismissed at first instance, on the grounds that authorisation could not be given without the necessary consent under Article 49 of the Road Traffic Code.
Tožba, ki jo je vložil MOTOE, je bila na prvi stopnji zavrnjena, ker se dovoljenja brez potrebnega soglasja v smislu člena 49 zakona o cestnem prometu ni smelo izdati.
It was also held that Article 49 of the Road Traffic Code was neither unconstitutional nor contrary to Community law.
Poleg tega naj bi člen 49 zakona o cestnem prometu ne bil niti protiustaven niti v nasprotju s pravom Skupnosti.
On 26 July 2000, MOTOE asked the Ministry of Public Order for information on the progress of its application for authorisation.
MOTOE je 26. julija 2000 od ministrstva za javni red zahteval informacijo o stanju obravnave njegove vloge za dovoljenje.
On 7 August 2000, the Ministry of Public Order informed MOTOE that the necessary consent from ETHEAM/ELPA had not yet been given.
Ministrstvo za javni red je 7. avgusta 2000 MOTOE odgovorilo, da ELPA oziroma ETHEAM �e ni dala potrebnega soglasja.
MOTOE subsequently brought an action before the Diikitiko Protodikio Athinon 8 for damages in the amount of GRD 5 million. 9
MOTOE je zato vložilo tožbo pri Dioikitiko Protodikeio Athinon 8zaradi povračila �kode v vi�ini 5 milijonov GRD 9.
MOTOE lodged an appeal with the Diikitiko Efetio Athinon, 10the referring court, against the judgment given at first instance.
Proti prvostopenjski sodbi je MOTOE vložil pri Dioikitiko Efeteio Athinon, 10 predložitvenem sodi�ču, pritožbo.
8 — Administrative Court, Athens.
8 – Upravno sodi�če v Atenah.
9 — According to the official euro exchange rate (EUR 1 = GRD 340.750), this corresponds to an amount of EUR 14 673.51.
9 – Po končnem obračunskem tečaju eura (1 EUR = 340,750 GRD) pomeni to znesek 14.673,51 EUR.
10 — Administrative Appeal Court, Athens.
10 – Vi�je upravno sodi�če v Atenah.
IV — Reference for a preliminary ruling
IV – Predlog za sprejetje predhodne odločbe
In the proceedings before the Court, the Greek Government and the Commission of the European Communities have submitted written observations and presented oral argument.
V postopku pred Sodi�čem sta gr�ka vlada in Komisija Evropskih skupnosti podali pisna in ustna stali�ča.
MOTOE has merely presented oral argument.
MOTOE je svoje trditve podal le ustno.
By order of 21 November 2006, which was received at the Court on 5 February 2007, the Diikitiko Efetio Athinon stayed proceedings and referred the following two questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling:
S sodbo z dne 21. novembra 2006, ki je prispela na Sodi�če 5. februarja 2007, je Dioikitiko Efeteio Athinon prekinilo odločanje in Sodi�ču v predhodno odločanje predložilo ti vpra�anji:
A — Preliminary remark
A – Uvodna pripomba
Sport is not generally removed from the scope of the EC Treaty.
Šport v splo�nem ni izvzet s področja uporabe Pogodbe ES.
This is recognised both at political level and in the caselaw of the Community courts.
To je priznano tako na politični ravni kot tudi v sodni praksi sodi�č Skupnosti.
‘(1) Can Articles 82 and 86 EC be interpreted so as also to include within their scope the activity of a legal person which has the status of national representative of the International Motorcycling Federation and engages in economic activity as described above by entering into sponsorship, advertising and insurance contracts, in the context of the organisation of motor sport events by it?
Ali je treba člena 82 ES in 86 ES razlagati tako, da zajemata tudi dejavnost pravne osebe, ki je nacionalni zastopnik Mednarodne motociklistične zveze in izvaja gospodarsko dejavnost, kot je opisana zgoraj, s sklepanjem sponzorskih pogodb, pogodb o ogla�evanju in zavarovalnih pogodb v okviru �portnih prireditev na področju motociklističnega �porta?
For example, at political level, the Intergovernmental Conference on the Treaty of Amsterdam (1997), in a ‘Declaration on Sport’, 11 called on the bodies of the European Union to listen to sports associations when important questions affecting sport are at issue and to give special consideration to the particular characteristics of amateur sport.
Na politični ravni je medvladna konferenca o Amsterdamski pogodbi (1997) v Izjavi o �portu 11institucije Evropske unije pozvala, naj pri pomembnih vpra�anjih, ki zadevajo �port, prisluhnejo �portnim združenjem in �e posebno upo�tevajo posebnosti amaterskega �porta.
A similar declaration is attached to the Presidency Conclusions of the Nice European
Podobna izjava je dodana Sklepom predsedstva Evropskega
11 — Declaration No 29 in the Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference on the Treaty of Amsterdam signed on 2 October 1997 (OJ 1997 C 340, p. 136).
11 – Izjava �t. 29 v sklepni listini medvladne konference o Amsterdamski pogodbi, podpisani 2. oktobra 1997 (UL C 340, str. 136).
(2) Should the answer [to the first question] be in the affirmative, is Article 49 of Law 2696/1999, which, in relation to issue by the competent national public authority (in the present case, the Ministry of Public Order) of permission to organise a motor-vehicle competition, gives the abovementioned legal person the power to provide a concurring opinion as to the holding of the competition without that power being made subject to restrictions, obligations and review, compatible with those provisions of the Treaty?’
V primeru pritrdilnega odgovora [na prvo vpra�anje]: ali je z zgoraj navedenima členoma Pogodbe ES skladen člen 49 zakona �t. 2696/1999, s katerim je v zvezi z izdajo dovoljenja za organizacijo tekmovanja z motornimi vozili s strani pristojnega nacionalnega organa (v tem primeru ministrstva za javni red) zgoraj navedeni pravni osebi podeljeno pooblastilo za izdajo soglasja za izvedbo dirke brez omejitev, obveznosti in nadzora nad izvajanjem tega pooblastila?
MOTOE the meaning of Article 2 EC.
MOTOE gospodarsko dejavnost v smislu člena 2 ES.
17Whereas, initially, that caselaw was largely concerned with the effects of the fundamental freedoms on sport, 18the competition rules of the EC
17Medtem ko so bili v začetku bolj v ospredju vplivi temeljnih svobo�čin na �port, 18v zadnjem času v ospredje sodne prakse prihajajo pravila o konkurenci iz Pogodbe ES. 19 sveta v Nici (2000).
12 Last year, the Commission also presented a ‘White Paper on Sport’, in which it addresses the effects of Community law on sport and confirms the application of the acquis communautaire to sport. 13
12Lani je poleg tega Komisija predstavila Belo knjigo o �portu, v kateri med drugim obravnava vplive prava EU na �port in poudarja veljavnost pravnega reda Skupnosti (acquis communautaire) na področju �porta. 13
19This is also true of the present case, in which the Court is called upon to interpret Articles 82 EC and 86 EC.
Tako je tudi v obravnavanem primeru, v katerem je Sodi�če pozvano k razlagi členov 82 ES in 86 ES.
Such declarations and initiatives emphasise the fact that sport is not entirely excluded from the field of activity of the European Union and/or the European Commu- nity.
Tak�ne izjave in pobude poudarjajo, da �port ni povsem izvzet s področja dejavnosti
Indeed, on the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, 14sport will be expressly mentioned in Community primary law. 15
Evropske unije oziroma Evropske skupnosti. Sicer pa bo z uveljavitvijo Lizbonske pogodbe 14�port celo izrecno na�el mesto v primarnem pravu EU. 15
Whereas the first question concerns the applicability of Articles 82 EC and 86 EC to a non-profit-making organisation such as ELPA, by its second question, the referring court focuses on ELPA’s dual role as an organisation which, on the one hand,
Medtem ko se prvo vpra�anje za predhodno odločanje nana�a na uporabo členov 82 ES in 86 ES za nepridobitno organizacijo, kakr�na je ELPA, se predložitveno sodi�če s svojim drugim vpra�anjem osredotoča na dvojno vlogo ELPE kot organizacije, ki po eni strani soodloča o državnem dovo-
The Community judicature recognises in its settled caselaw 16that sport is in any event subject to Community law in so far as it constitutes an economic activity within
Sodišča Skupnosti priznavajo v ustaljeni sodni praksi, 16 da �port vsekakor sodi v okvir prava Skupnosti v delu, v katerem pomeni