natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this regard it is important to strive for an integrated sectoral regulatory and enforcement policy.
Pri tem je pomembno delovati v korist ureditvene politike in usklajenega sektorskega nadzora.
A number of other sectors that are important for the global competitiveness of Europe’s economy feature considerable self-regulation or a mix of self-regulation and regulation by the State. is is the case in particular of nancial services.
Za številne druge sektorje, pomembne za svetovno konkurenčnost evropskega gospodarstva, je značilna velika stopnja samoregulative ali mešanica samoregulative in državnih ureditev. To velja zlasti za nančne storitve.
Creating an e cient and liquid capital market is one of the key objectives of the Financial Services Action Plan.
Oblikovanje učinkovitega in likvidnega kapitalskega trga je eden ključnih ciljev akcijskega načrta za nančne storitve.
A number of internal market policy initiatives, culminating in the new Investment Services Directive, were launched during the last Commission’s term of o ce to remove barriers to cross-border securities trading and facilitate competition between investment rms.
Številne spodbude v politikah za notranji trg, ki so dosegle vrhunec z novo direktivo o investicijskih storitvah, so bile uvedene med zadnjim mandatom Komisije, da bi se odstranile ovire za čezmejno trgovino z vrednostnimi papirji in da bi se pospešila konkurenca med investicijskimi podjetji.
In addition, retail nancial services play a major role in the everyday life of European Union citizens. ese services must be provided under competitive conditions, which means that the individual consumer has a larger choice of products and services of a higher quality at the best possible price.
Poleg tega maloprodajne nančne storitve pomembno vplivajo na vsakdanje življenje državljanov Evropske unije. Te storitve je treba ponujati v konkurenčnih pogojih, kar pomeni večjo izbiro, boljšo kakovost ter najboljšo možno ceno proizvodov in storitev za potrošnika.
BOX 1: THE CHIEF COMPETITION ECONOMIST AT THE COMPETITION DG IN 2004 e Chief Economist Team (CET) is a separate unit directly reporting to the Director-General.
OKVIR 1: GLAVNI EKONOMIST ZA KONKURENCO PRI GD ZA KONKURENCO LETA 2004
It has 10 members, all of whom have a PhD in industrial economics. e tasks and role of the CET can be described as follows:
V skupini je 10 članov, ki so vsi doktorji znanosti na področju ekonomike podjetij. Naloge in vloga CET so naslednje:
— guidance on methodological issues of economics and econometrics in the application of EU competition rules;
• svetovanje v zvezi z metodološkimi vprašanji ekonomije in ekonometrije pri uporabi pravil konkurence EU;
— general guidance in individual competition cases from their early stages;
• splošno svetovanje pri posameznih konkurenčnih primerih že od prvih stopenj postopka;
— detailed guidance in the most important competition cases involving complex economic issues, in particular those requiring sophisticated quantitative analysis; this could include the secondment of a member of the CET to work in the case team;
• specialistično svetovanje pri najpomembnejših konkurenčnih primerih, ki vključujejo zapletena gospodarska vprašanja, zlasti tista, ki potrebujejo zahtevno kvantitativno analizo; to pa lahko vključuje dodelitev člana CET skupini, ki se ukvarja s primerom;
— contribution to the development of general policy instruments with an economic content.
V takih primerih je član CET dodeljen skupini, ki se ukvarja s primerom, in ima dostop do vseh informacij ter sodeluje na vseh sestankih z zunanjimi strokovnjaki in strankami. V skupini, ki
In 2004, the CET was involved in a total of 33 cases (11 mergers, 15 antitrust, and 7 State aid cases).
Glavni ekonomist za konkurenco se udeležuje tedenskih sestankov s komisarjem.
In addition, the CET has made significant contributions to guidelines and general policy issues.
Poleg tega pripravi pisni nasvet v vseh primerih, pri katerih je sodeloval.
Cases are selected in agreement with the Director-General on the basis of the need for more sophisticated economic analysis, in particular quantitative analysis.
Prispevek k razvoju strokovnega znanja in izkušenj na področju ekonomije v Generalnem direktoratu
In such cases, a member of the CET is placed on the case team, having access to all information and participating in all meetings with outside experts and parties.
Glavni ekonomist za konkurenco z organizacijo usposabljanj, seminarjev in razprav prispeva k splošni razpravi o ekonomskih vprašanjih v celotnem GD za konkurenco.
Within the case team the members seconded from the CET have specific and independent status and report directly to the Chief Competition Economist on the line they take.
Prestrukturiral je ekonomskosvetovalno skupino za politiko konkurence (ESSPK). ESSPK je skupina vodilnih akademikov, ki deluje na področju ekonomike podjetij.
Given the importance of shaping the economic analysis of a case, the CET tends to become involved as early as possible.
Pomembna naloga ESSPK je zagotoviti neodvisno mnenje o širših političnih vprašanjih.
e CET also attends the oral hearing and participates in the internal review panel debates.
ESSPK je organiziran v tri podskupine: združitve, boj proti monopolom in državne pomoči.
In addition, he provides written advice in all cases where he has been involved.
SPOROČILO POOBLAŠČENCA ZA ZASLIŠANJE
Contribution to the development of economic expertise in the Competition DG e Chief Competition Economist contributes to the overall debate on economic issues throughout the Competition DG, organising training, seminars and discussions.
Komisija je vzpostavila funkcijo pooblaščenca za zaslišanje, da bi zaupala vodenje upravnih postopkov v protimonopolnih primerih in primerih združitve neodvisni osebi, ki ima izkušnje v zadevah konkurence in zagotavlja neoporečnost, ki je nujna za objektivnost, preglednost in učinkovitost teh postopkov.
In addition, he maintains and strengthens links with the academic world.
Mandat pooblaščenca za zaslišanje določa številne mehanizme, prek katerih se ta funkcija izvaja.
He has restructured the Economic Advisory Group for Competition Policy (EAGCP). e EAGCP is a group of leading academics working in the area of industrial economics.
Zaradi tega v vseh primerih, v katerih je formalni postopek sprožen in zaključen na ta način, uradno sodelujeta oba pooblaščenca za zaslišanje.
An important function of the EAGCP is to provide an independent opinion on broad policy issues. e EAGCP is organised in three subgroups: mergers, antitrust and State aid.
Od maja 2004 je to vključevalo tako imenovane „odločbe o zavezah“ v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003, od katerih je bila prva zadeva Nemška nogometna zveza (DFB), o kateri je bila odločba sprejeta januarja 2005.
Report on competition policy 2004 — Volume 1 been respected.
Poročilo o politiki konkurence za leto 2004 – Zvezek 1
As a result, the two Hearing O cers are formally involved in all cases where a formal procedure is initiated and terminated in this manner.
Zagotavljanje pravice do zaslišanja z dodelitvijo ustreznega dostopa do spisa
Since May 2004, this has included socalled ‘commitment decisions’ under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003, the rst of which was the DFB case decided in January 2005. Exceptionally, the Hearing O cers may also be approached before a formal procedure is initiated, for example where confidentiality issues arise in relation to information to be included in a statement of objections, or in relation to the published version of a decision.
Ob upoštevanju zakonitih interesov posredovalcev podatkov pri varovanju zaupnih informacij, javnega interesa pri izpolnjevanju pravil konkurence ter pravice do obrambe naslovnikov obvestila o nasprotovanju sta pooblaščenca za zaslišanje sprejela številne odločitve, s katerimi sta strankam odobrila ali zavrnila dostop do dokumentov v sodnem spisu.
Taken together, the Hearing O cers were thus formally involved in some 40 cases in the course of 2004.
Med takimi odločitvami iz leta 2004 so se obravnavale tudi pravice strank do dostopa, ki so prejele tako imenovano „pismo dejstev“, s katerim so bile obveščene o dodatnih informacijah, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri dokončni odločbi.
Some key elements of these experiences are set out below.
Odločitvi v zadevah Microsoin Clearstream sta primera, ko je bil strankam v takih okoliščinah odobren dostop do dodatnih informacij.
Ensuring the right to be heard through granting appropriate access to the le
Zagotavljanje zaščite poslovnih skrivnosti podjetij in zakonitih interesov podjetij po zaupnosti
Taking account of the information providers’ legitimate interest in the protection of confidential information, the public interest in the competition rules being respected and the rights of defence of the addressees of a statement of objections, the Hearing O cers have taken a number of decisions by which they have granted or refused parties access to documents in the case le.
V primeru nesporazuma med pristojno službo Komisije in zadevnimi strankami morata o varstvu poslovnih skrivnosti in zakonitih interesov podjetij po zaupnosti odločati pooblaščenca za zaslišanje. Ta interes mora biti uravnotežen z interesi strank pri razkritju ali, kadar vprašanje zadeva objavo odločitve, z javnim interesom pri obveščanju pravne in poslovne skupnosti o rezultatu postopka.
Amongst such decisions in 2004 consideration was given to the access rights of parties receiving a socalled ‘letter of facts’ by which they were informed of additional information to be taken into account in the nal decision. e Microso and Clearstream decisions are examples of cases where, in such circumstances, the parties were granted access to further information.
Leta 2004 je bila večina odločitev pooblaščencev za zaslišanje o razkritju potencialno zaupnih informacij povezana z zakonitostjo objav dokončnih odločb Komisije. Te odločitve so pomagale oblikovati številna načela, ki se bodo uporabljala v prihodnjih primerih.
Ensuring protection of the undertakings’ business secrets and legitimate interest in confidentiality dentiality
Prvič, v skladu s sodno prakso mora vsaka zahteva po zaupnosti vključevati utemeljitev, zakaj bi objava domnevno zaupnih informacij lahko resno škodila podjetju (1
In the Belgian Architects Association case, the danger of retaliation led the Hearing O cers to refuse access to a document in the le which would have allowed the parties to identify the informant.
Tretjič, pooblaščenec za zaslišanje ni dolžan odločati, ali je objava delov dokončne odločbe neizogibna za njihovo ustrezno razumevanje. Pomembnost posameznega podatka za celotno razumevanje odločbe se bo preučila samo, če bo zadevni del besedila zaupna informacija.
Firstly, in accordance with the case-law, any request for confidentiality is required to substantiate why the disclosure of the supposedly confidential information could
V skladu z zadevo T-353/94, Postbank NV, odstavek 87, so poslovne skrivnosti„informacije, katerih razkritje javnosti ali samo njihovo posredovanje osebi, ki teh informacij ni zagotovila, lahko resno škodi interesom osebe, ki je te informacije razkrila“.Člen 30 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 in člen 21 Uredbe št. 17/62 določata, da mora Komisija upoštevati samo„zakonite interese družb pri zaščiti njihovih poslovnih skrivnosti“.
In addition, in the course of 2004 a procedure to be applied before taking legally binding decisions on the disclosure of confidential information was introduced with a view to avoiding legal disputes wherever possible. e Hearing O cers may in the rst place propose a preliminary view.
Poleg tega je bil leta 2004 uveden postopek, ki ga je treba uporabiti pred sprejetjem pravno zavezujočih odločb o razkritju zaupnih informacij, da bi se tako izognili pravnim sporom, kadar je le mogoče. Pooblaščenca za zaslišanje lahko najprej predlagata predhodno mnenje.
Only if this proposal is contested within a given time period will the Hearing O cers proceed to a binding decision which can be challenged before the Court of First Instance.
Samo če se ta predlog izpodbija v danem časovnem obdobju, bosta pooblaščenca za zaslišanje prešla na zavezujočo odločbo, ki se lahko izpodbija pred Sodiščem prve stopnje.
In many cases, this new practice has helped to avoid socalled ‘Akzo procedures’.
V številnih primerih je ta nova praksa pomagala pri izogibanju tako imenovanim „postopkom Akzo“.
In the course of the latter, the Hearing O cers take a formal and binding decision on behalf of the Commission to disclose potentially confidential information, decision which is subject to review by the Court of First Instance.
Pri teh postopkih pooblaščenca za zaslišanje v imenu Komisije sprejmeta formalno in zavezujočo odločbo o razkritju potencialno zaupnih informacij. To odločbo lahko ponovno pregleda Sodišče prve stopnje.
Oral hearings provide the parties with the opportunity to supplement their written reply to the Commission’s competition concerns by presenting the main issues orally before a wide audience with the opportunity to respond to questions and engage in direct discussion with relevant Commission departments and representatives from the Member States.
Ustna zaslišanja dajejo strankam priložnost, da dopolnijo svoj pisni odgovor na pomisleke glede konkurence, ki jih je izrazila Komisija, tako da ustno pred širšim občinstvom predstavijo najpomembnejša vprašanja in imajo možnost odgovarjati na vprašanja ter sodelovati v neposredni razpravi s pristojnimi službami Komisije in predstavniki držav članic.
It may also be a unique occasion for the complainants or other third parties involved in the procedure to listen to and comment directly on the points addressed. is was indeed the situation in the Microso case where, a er ve years’ investigation and written procedure including three statements of objections, written responses and written observations from numerous third parties, representatives of all parties involved sat together for the rst time and for three days presented their own views and commented on others for the benefit of all concerned.
To je lahko tudi edinstvena priložnost za pritožnika ali druge tretje stranke, ki sodelujejo v postopku, da poslušajo in neposredno komentirajo obravnavane točke. To se je dejansko zgodilo v primeru družbe Microso , ko so se po petih letih preiskave in pisnih postopkov, vključno s tremi obvestili o nasprotovanju, pisnimi odgovori in pisnimi izjavami številnih tretjih strank, predstavniki vseh vpletenih strank prvič sestali in tri dni predstavljali svoja stališča ter komentirali stališča drugih v korist vseh vpletenih.
According to Case T-353/94 Postbank, paragraph 87, business secrets are ‘information of which not only disclosure to the public but also mere transmission to a person other than the one that provided the information may seriously harm the latter’s interests’.Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 and Article 21 of Regulation No 17/62 stipulate that the Commission only needs to take account of ‘the legitimate interest of undertakings in the protection of their business secrets’.
V nekaterih primerih, kot je zadeva holin klorid, sta se pooblaščenca za zaslišanje strinjala, da se pri ustnem zaslišanju v postopek vključijo novi dokazi. Kot kažejo končna poročila, objavljena leta 2004, se je po nekaterih ustnih zaslišanjih, kot je primer združitve družb Sony/BMG, spremenil pristop do primerov.
Report on competition policy 2004 — Volume 1 hearings in antitrust and merger proceedings is significant in view of their importance in the context of the overall procedure. e organisation itself is carried out in close contact with the parties concerned.
Poročilo o politiki konkurence za leto 2004 – Zvezek 1
During the hearing new documents may be admitted by the Hearing O cers, at the request of the relevant Commission department, the parties or third parties concerned. e new legislation introduced in the course of 2004 in both merger and antitrust cases explicitly provides for questions to be asked by all parties concerned under the authority of the Hearing O cers.
Poleg tega ustna zaslišanja pooblaščenca za zaslišanje ozaveščajo o kritičnih vidikih primera in jima omogočajo dejavnejše sodelovanje v poznejših stopnjah postopka, po možnosti z dajanjem pripomb o nadaljnjem poteku postopka v skladu z njunim mandatom.
In some instances, such as the Choline chloride case, the Hearing O cers accepted that fresh evidence could be admitted to the procedure at the oral hearing.
Delovanje kot svetovalec komisarja za politiko konkurence
Acting as advisor to the Commissioner for competition policy e Hearing O cers’ primary duty is to ensure that the parties’ rights of defence are respected and that due process is achieved for all parties concerned.
Glavna dolžnost pooblaščencev za zaslišanje je zagotoviti spoštovanje pravic strank do obrambe in predpisan postopek za vse zadevne stranke.
However, in the framework of their interim report, or more generally when they report to the Commissioner, with special reference to the content of the hearing, the Hearing O cers may make use of their ability to alert the Commissioner on a substantive issue raised by the case where they consider this would enhance the quality of the nal decision.
Vendar pa lahko pooblaščenca za zaslišanje v okviru svojega vmesnega poročila oziroma, splošneje, poročanja komisarju, s posebnim poudarkom na vsebini zaslišanja, uporabita svojo zmožnost in komisarja opozorita na vsebinsko vprašanje, ki ga je sprožil primer, kadar menita, da bi to povečalo kakovost dokončne odločbe.
In 2004, the Hearing O cers worked towards clearer dra ing of nal decisions. ey made observations in a number of cases, notably cartel cases, which helped improve the decision-making process and ultimately the quality of the nal decisions.
Leta 2004 sta se pooblaščenca za zaslišanje zavzela za pripravo jasnejših dokončnih odločb. V številnih primerih, zlasti v zvezi s karteli, sta izrazila svoja stališča, kar je pomagalo izboljšati postopek odločanja in navsezadnje tudi kakovost dokončnih odločb.
e Hearing O cers also discussed a number of policy issues with the Directorate-General for Competition.
Pooblaščenca za zaslišanje sta z GD za konkurenco razpravljala tudi o številnih političnih vprašanjih.
Such discussions included, inter alia, the revision of the Commission’s notice on access to the le, adapting the rules on statements under the Commission’s leniency programme to the discovery rules of foreign jurisdictions whilst respecting the right to have access to the le, and the Hearing O cers’ role as potential mediators in disputes between the Competition DG and companies over whether a document is covered by legal privilege.
Takšne razprave so med drugim vključevale revizijo obvestila Komisije o dostopu do spisov, nujnost prilagajanja pravil o izjavah, predloženih v zvezi s programom prizanesljivosti Komisije, pravilom o razkritju, veljavnim v drugih jurisdikcijah, pri čemer mora biti upoštevana pravica dostopa do spisa, ter vloge pooblaščencev za zaslišanje kot potencialnih posrednikov v sporih med GD za konkurenco in podjetji glede zaupnosti dokumenta.
Antitrust modernisation: Implementing Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, guidelines and notices
Posodobitev protimonopolne zakonodaje: Izvedbena uredba (ES) št. 773/2004, smernice in obvestila
On 1 May, the new enforcement system for Articles 81 and 82 EC of the Treaty entered into force and Regulation No 17/62 was repealed.
Prvega maja je začel veljati nov sistem izvrševanja členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe, Uredba št. 17/62 pa je bila razveljavljena.
In order to complement Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (3)and following extensive consultations, the Commission adopted the ‘modernisation package’ consisting of a new Commission regulation on details of its antitrust procedures as well as six new Commission notices aimed at providing guidance on a range of aspects that are of particular significance under the new enforcement system. is package consists of the following elements:
Da bi Komisija dopolnila Uredbo (ES) št. 1/2003 (3), je po obsežnih posvetovanjih sprejela „posodobitveni sveženj“, sestavljen iz nove uredbe Komisije o podrobnostih protimonopolnih postopkov ter šestih novih obvestil Komisije, ki zagotavljajo smernice za vidike, ki so v novem sistemu izvrševanja posebno pomembni. Ta sveženj sestavljajo naslednji elementi:
Implementing regulation (4
Izvedbena uredba (
Network notice (
Obvestilo o mreži za konkurenco (
In this respect the notice follows the joint statement of the Council and the Commission (6) which was issued on the day when Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 was adopted.
V tem pogledu obvestilo sledi skupni izjavi Sveta in Komisije (6), izdani na dan sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003.
Particular arrangements have been found for the interface between exchanges of information between authorities pursuant to Article 11(2) and (3) and Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 and the operation of leniency programmes.
Posebna ureditev je predvidena za povezavo izmenjav informacij med organi na podlagi členov 11(2) in (3) ter 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003 ter za delovanje programov prizanesljivosti.
National authorities of the Member States (7) have signed a statement in which they declare that they will abide by the principles set out in the Commission notice.
Nacionalni organi držav članic (7) so podpisali izjavo o upoštevanju načel, določenih v obvestilu
Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003), Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 411/2004 (OJ L 68, 6.3.2004).Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004).Commission notice on cooperation within the network of competition authorities (OJ C 101).Available from the Council register at http://register.consilium.eu.int (document No 15435/02 ADD 1).
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o izvajanju pravil konkurence iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES (UL L 1, 4.1.2003), uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 411/2004 (UL L 68, 6.3.2004).Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 773/2004 z dne 7. aprila 2004 o vodenju postopkov s strani Komisije v skladu s členoma 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES (UL L 123, 27.4.2004).Obvestilo Komisije o sodelovanju znotraj mreže organov za konkurenco (UL C 101).Na voljo v registru Sveta na spletni strani http://register.consilium.eu.int (dokument št. 15435/02 ADD 1).
A list of national authorities which have signed the statement regarding the Commission notice on cooperation within the network of competition authorities can be found on the Commission’s website.
Seznam nacionalnih organov, ki so podpisali izjavo v zvezi z Obvestilom Komisije o sodelovanju znotraj mreže organov za konkurenco, je na voljo na spletni strani Komisije.
Notice on cooperation with national courts (8
Obvestilo o sodelovanju z nacionalnimi sodišči (8
It assembles the relevant caselaw of the Court of Justice, thus clarifying the procedural context in which national judges are operating.
Obvestilo povzema zadevno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti ter s tem pojasnjuje postopkovni okvir, v katerem delujejo nacionalni sodniki.
Particular attention is given to the situation in which the national court deals with a case in parallel with or subsequent to the Commission.
Posebna pozornost je namenjena položaju, v katerem nacionalno sodišče obravnava primer istočasno s Komisijo ali potem ko ga obravnava Komisija.
Furthermore, Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 establishes an express legal basis for national judges to ask the Commission for an opinion or for information it holds, and provides for the possibility for the Commission, under certain conditions, to submit written and oral observations to the national courts. e notice explains the functioning of those cooperation mechanisms.
Poleg tega Uredba (ES) št. 1/2003 vzpostavlja izrecno pravno podlago za nacionalne sodnike, da zaprosijo Komisijo za mnenje ali informacije, s katerimi razpolaga, in Komisiji zagotavlja možnost, da nacionalnim sodiščem pod določenimi pogoji predloži pisna ali ustna stališča. Obvestilo pojasnjuje delovanje teh mehanizmov sodelovanja.