natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Detailsaboutthiscalcula-tion are provided in the annex to the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposalfor a new Council Regulation.
Podrobnosti o tem izračunu so na voljo v prilogi k oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta.
57.The Commission takes account of significant under-execution by Member States.
57.Komisijaupoštevanezadostnoizvrševanje s strani držav članic.
The fact that noadjustment wasapplied duringthe periodunderscrutiny(plans2006–2008)is due to the highlevel of execution achieved by participant Member States.
V obdobju, za katero je bil opravljen pregled, zaradi visoke stopnje izvrševanjavsodelujočihdržavahčlanicah nibilauporabljenaprilagoditev(načrtiza leta 2006–2008).
The Commission stresses that any calculation method has to be based on official statistics availablefor all Member States.
Komisija poudarja, da mora metoda izračuna temeljiti na uradnih statističnih podatkih, ki so na voljo za vse države članice.
However,fromthisproce-dureit cannot be concludedthatthe Member States wereallocatedproducts which they did not want.
Države članice Komisiji sporočijo, katere proizvodehočejo.
Fact is that Member Statesacceptedthattheirinitialrequest could not be met and that, in exchange, they havereceived products whichtheyinitially didnotdemand.
Otehzačetnihzahtevah se posvetuje v okviru upravljalnega odbora in meddvostranskimistiki.Posledičnose začetnezahteveprilagodijo.Rižin maslo sonaprimernadomestilidrugiproizvodi.
Nevertheless,all Member Statesacceptedthesedecisionsandwel-comedthe productstheyfinallyreceived.
Kljub temu iz tega postopka ni mogoče sklepati, da so države članice dobile proizvode, ki jih niso hotele.
58.Thedefinitionofnationalneedsisthe responsibilityof Member States following theirownprocedures,inparticularcon-sultinginvolved charities.In this sense, the Commission has always actively encouraged Member States to involve charities in the inception ofthe programme.
Dejstvo je, da so se države članicesprijaznilestem,danjihovihzače-tnihzahtevnibilo mogočeizpolniti,inso namestotegaprejeleproizvode,zakatere nisozaprosilenazačetku.Kljubtemuso sevsedržavečlanicestrinjalestemiodlo-čitvamiinsprejeleproizvode,kisojihna koncu dobile.
63.EUandnationallegislationonpublicpro-curementapplytothetendersruninthe framework of this scheme, without the need of this legislation being explicitly mentioned in Regulations.
58.Za opredelitev nacionalnih potreb so odgo-vornedržavečlanicevskladussvojimi postopki,zlastivposvetovanjussodelu-jočimidobrodelnimiorganizacijami.Vtem smisluje Komisija vedno spodbujala države članice, da dobrodelne organizacije vključijo ob začetku programa.
The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulationforeseesthat Member States co-financetheprogramme, which willfur-ther encourage Member States to secure the necessary matchingbetweenrequestsand effective needs (see Annex 14 to the Impact Assessment accompanyingthe Commission proposal).
Predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta določa sofinanciranje programa s strani držav članic, kar bo države članice še bolj spodbudilo, da zagotovijo potrebno skladnost med zahtevami in dejanskimi potrebami (glej Pri-logo14oceneučinka,kispremljapredlog Komisije).
The Commission has performed 6 audits between2006and2007withoutfinding any majorshortcomingintheprocedures followedby Member States to run the tenders.
Komisija je v letih 2006 in 2007 opravila šest revizijinniodkrilanobenevečjepomanj-kljivostivpostopkih,kisojihdržavečla-niceizvajale prijavnihrazpisih.
Furthermore,it hasfoundthat opera-torsbasedinadifferent MemberState are granted with supply contracts, which shows thatcompetitionbetweenoperatorsfrom various Member States occurs.
Polegtega jeugotovila,dasedobaviteljem,kiimajo sedežvdrugidržavičlanici,dodeljujejo pogodbeodobavi,karpomeni,daobstaja konkurencameddobaviteljiizrazličnih držav članic.
Overall,the way Member States conduct the tenders has proven in compliance with the requirements laid downinthe EU Directive 2004/18/EC.
Na splošno se je način, na kate-regadržavečlaniceizvajajojavnerazpise, izkazal za skladnega z zahtevami iz Direktive EU 2004/18/ES.
Provisions regarding the delays for submission of offers are laid down in Art. 38 ofthe Directiveandcanvaryaccordingto the modalities of implementation chosen in Article 36.
Rokizapredložitevponudbsodoločeni včlenu38 Direktiveinselahkorazlikujejo glede na načinizvajanja,izbran v členu 36.
65.Oneoftheobjectivesoftheprogrammeis thedisposalofinterventionstocks.
65.Eden od ciljev programa je odstranitev intervencijskih zalog.
When available they constitute the priority source ofsupplyforthe programme.
Kadar so na voljo, predsta-vljajoprednostnidobavnivirzaprogram.
Furthermore, the disposal ofintervention stocks through this scheme enables the Community to save the storage costs that otherwise would have to be borne bythe EU budget.
Poleg tega odstranitev intervencijskih zalog v okviru tega programa Skupnosti omogoča, da prihrani na stroških skladiščenja, ki bi se sicer kriliiz proračuna EU.
The criteria to award contracts are the ones describedin Article 53:i.e. the most advan-tageousofferintermsofquantityoffered/transportcost,orthelowerofferinterms of price.
Merila za oddajo naročil so določena v členu 53, tj. najugodnejša ponudba v smislu ponujene količine/ stroškov prevoza ali najnižja ponudba kar zadeva ceno.
See Commission reply to paragraph 64.
Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 64.
The Commission too noted the sometimes low number of participants submitting bids butitfound noevidence ofalink between the low participation and the way the Direc-tiverequirements wereimplemented.
Tudi Komisija ugotavlja, da včasih odda ponudbemaloudeležencev,nipanašla dokazaopovezavi mednizkoudeležboin načinomizvajanja zahteviz Direktive.
The Commission mainlyfollowstheevolu-tion of market pricesfor unprocessedagri-cultural products while the tenders concern food ready for consumption.
Komisijaspremljapredvsemgibanjetržnih cennepredelanihkmetijskihproizvodov, medtemkosejavnirazpisinanašajona živila,kiso pripravljenaza uporabo.Iz primerjave med obematipomacen ni mogoče izpeljati operativnih zaključkov.
No operational conclusionscanbebasedoncomparisons between bothtypes of prices.
Gledenaraznolikostproizvodov,kise dobavijo,karzadevakoličinoinkvaliteto, ni mogoče primerjati cenizjavnega razpisa stržnimi.Zatonatejpodlaginiso mogoči sklepi o„kakovosti“ predloženih ponudb.
67.Seethe Commissionreplyto paragraph 64.
67.Glej odgovor Komisije na odstavek 64.
Given the diversity both in terms of quantity and quality ofthe productsto besupplied, it is not possible to compare prices obtained under the calls for tender with market prices. Consequently, noconclusioncan be drawn on this basis about the ‘quality’ of the offers submitted.
69.Komisija je med revizijami tudi ugotovila, da je več družb dobivalo naročila večlet zapored, vendar ni dokaza, da obstaja povezava med majhno udeležboin načinomizvajanja zahtev Direktive.
Directive2004/18/ECgoverningthepro-ceduresfortheaward of public workscon-tracts,publicsupplycontractsandpublic servicecontracts,isinforceinall Member States.Even when, withina Member State, provisions regulating tendering procedures differ,theyremaininconformity withthe Directive.
Direktiva2004/18/ES,kiurejapostopkeza oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, javna naročila blagainjavna naročilastoritev,je v veljavi v vseh državah članicah.
69.The Commission audits also found that sev-eralcompanieswereawardedcontracts overseveralyears butthereis no evidence of alink betweenthelow participation and the way the Directive requirements were implemented.
Tudi če se določbe državečlanice,kiurejajopostopkejavnih naročil,razlikujejo,soševednoskladne z navedeno direktivo.
Callsfor tender are required to be published in national Official Journals, as well as in the Official Journal of the European Union.
70.Cilj programa je že od začetka umik zalog iz intervencije,dabizmanjšalistroške,kijih ima EU s skladiščenjem.
In some Member States visited by the Court, calls for tender are also publicised via Internet.
Ta dodaten ekonomski učinekjetreba upoštevati.
70.Theschemesinceitsbeginningaimedat withdrawingstocksfromintervention, relieving EU expenses on storage costs.
Poglavje VI Direktive vsebuje določbe glede objave javnih razpisov. Javni razpisi morajo bitiobjavljenivnacionalnihuradnihlistih in v Uradnemlistu Evropske unije.
This additional economic effect should be taken into account.
V nekaterih državah članicah, ki jih je Sodišče obiskalo, so javni razpisi objavljeni tudi na internetu.
(a)Given the basic link of this programme with interventionstocks,barteringwasuntil recentlythe core ofthescheme.
(a)Glede na osnovno povezavotega programa z intervencijskimi zalogami je bila blagovna menjava do nedavnegajedro programa.
(b)Almost all Member States have in place com-mitteestoestablishbarteringreferences, includingthose Member States visited by the Court.
(b)Skorajvsedržavečlaniceimajoodboreza opredelitevreferencvzvezizblagovno menjavo,tuditiste,kijihjeobiskalo Sodišče.
Settingobligationsontheoriginofthe productwouldnotonlyposemajorcon-troldifficultiesbutwouldimposeahuge administrativeburdenfor Member States’ administrations withoutanyimprovement oftheefficiencyofthescheme,ratherthe contrary.
Zdoločitvijoobveznostigledeizvorapro-izvodovbizelootežilinadzor,polegtega pabitopomenilovelikoupravnobreme zaorganedržavčlanic,pričemerseučin-kovitostprogramanebipovečala,prej nasprotno.
76.The measure has two complementary objectives: market stabilisation and contributing tothe wellbeing ofthe most deprived.
76.Ukrepima dva cilja, ki se dopolnjujeta: stabilizacijo trga in izboljšanje blaginje najbolj ogroženih.
Further, the Commission would like to stress that the European Parliament’s opinion5 does not callinto question the opportunity to continue to finance this measure through CAP expenditure.
vprašaj priložnosti za nadaljnje financiranje tegaukrepaizodhodkovskupnekmetijske politike.
The evaluation report to which the Court refers was elaborated byindependentcon-sultants andits conclusions should beread takinginto consideration the Commission’s criticalremarks onthe quality ofthe study, in particular with regard to its methodology, the robustness of the analysis and the credibility oftheresults.
Kotjenavedenovtočki25,seintervencij-ske zaloge nekaterih proizvodov vsedanjih tržnih pogojih povečujejo.
Asmentionedinparagraph25above, interventionstocksforcertainprod-uctsareincreasingundercurrent market conditions.
Poročiloooceni,nakaterosesklicuje Sodišče,soizdelalineodvisnisvetovalci, prirazlaginjegovihzaključkovpajetreba upoštevati kritične pripombe Komisije glede kakovosti študije. zlasti kar zadeva metodologijo, zanesljivost analize in verodostojnost rezultatov.
The European Parliament has just released its opinion6 supporting with certain amend- ments the proposal of the Commission for a new Council Regulation adapting the meas-ureto new prevailing conditions.
Evropskiparlamentjepravkarpodal mne-nje6,kiz nekaterimispremembami podpira predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, ki prilagaja ukrep novim pogojem.
Decisions to continue implementing the pro-grammehavebeentakenonthe meritsof the measureonbothitssocialand market stabilisation dimensions.
Odločitve o nadaljevanju izvajanja programa sobilesprejetenapodlagidobrihstrani ukrepa v smislu socialne dimenzije in dimen-zijestabilizacijetrga.
The abovementioned EP opinion reflects the supportofthisinstitutionforthe measure to continue to be funded from the Common Agricultural Policy.
Omenjeno mnenje EP odraža podporo te institucije nadaljnjemufinanciranju ukrepa izskupne kmetijske politike.
In this sense, the impact of the pro-grammecannotbe merelyassessedonthe average number of meals that it provides but ontheextentto whichitdoescontribute tothesupplyofcharitableorganisations. This aim is largely attained as far as the pro-grammeprovidesbetween30and70 %of the total food distributed in the Community to the most deprived people, depending on the charities andthe Member States.
Vtemsmisluučinkaprogramani mogoče ocenjevati samo glede na povprečno število obrokov,kijihzagotovi,pačpagledena obseg,vkaterem prispevak dobavi dobro-delnimustanovam.Taciljjevglavnem dosežen,sajprogramzagotavljaod30do 70 %(odvisnooddobrodelneorganizacije indržavečlanice)vsehživil,kiserazdelijo najbolj ogroženim v Skupnosti.
81.By virtue of the subsidiarity principle, Member States define the criteria of the population having access to the food aid distributed bythis measure.
Priporočilo 1Potemeljitianalizitehničnih,političnihin pravnihelementovprograma(glejoceno učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta), je Komisija ugotovila, da je skupna kmetijska politika ustrezen okvirza nadaljnjeizvajanje programa.
Recommendation 1Afterhavinganalysedinanextensive way thetechnical,politicalandlegalelements of the programme (see the Impact Assess-mentsupportingthe Commissionproposal for a new Council Regulation), the Commission has concluded that the CAP was the appropriateframeforthecontinuationof thescheme.
81.Vskladuznačelomsubsidiarnostidržave članice opredelijo merila glede tega, katera populacija ima dostop do živil, ki se razdelijo v okvirutega ukrepa.
79.The Commissionis of the view that the pro-grammeisbeingimplementedby Member States with a satisfactorylevel of coordination and consultation with all relevant actors althoughfurther progressinthis domainis alwaysto be pursued.
79.Komisija meni,dadržavečlaniceizvajajo program z zadovoljivo stopnjo usklajevanja inposvetovanjazvsemizadevnimiakterji, čepravsijetrebavednoprizadevatiza nadaljnji napredek natem področju.
Recommendation 3The Commission already analysed this issue intheframework of the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for a new Council Regulation.
Priporočilo 3Komisija je to vprašanje že analizirala v okviru oceneučinka,kispremljapredlogzanovo uredbo Sveta.
It concluded that the respect of the subsidiarity principle goes along with a higher efficiency ofthescheme whenthe targetingofthebeneficiariesremainsthe Member State’s competence.
Ugotovila je, da je zaradi spoštovanja načela subsidiarnosti učinkovitost sheme boljša, kadarso za določitev upravičencev pristojne države članice.
This position is supportedbyanoverwhelming majorityof stakeholders and coincides with the result of a public Internet consultation that received morethat 14 000replies.
Tostališče zagovarja tudi velika večina zainteresiranih strani,sklada pasetudizrezultatijavnega internetnegaposvetovanja,vokvirukate-regaje bilo zabeleženih 14 000 odzivov.
Recommendation 2For years,the programme has had a power-fulleverageeffectonthedevelopmentof foodinitiatives orrelated measures by private bodies (charities) and public authorities (Member State andlocallevels).
Priporočilo 2Programimaželeta močanspodbujevalni učineknarazvojpobudvzvezishranoali povezanihukrepovjavnihustanov(dobro-delnihustanovah)injavnihorganov(na ravni držav članicin nalokalniravni).
The Commission’s proposal for a new Council Regulation incorporates the obligation for Member States to prepare nationalfood distribution programmes that would include comprehensiveinformationonrecipients and charities taking part in the programme.
Predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta vključujeobveznost,dadržavečlanicepri-pravijonacionalneprogramerazdeljevanja hrane, ki bodo vključevali celoviteinforma-cije o prejemnikih in dobrodelnih ustanovah, ki sodelujejo v programu.
Details will belaid downintheimplement-ing rules after the adoption of the Commission proposal.
Podrobnosti bodo po sprejetju predloga Komisije določene vizvedbenih pravilih.
While taking due account of the subsidiarity prin-ciple,severaloptionstoenhancethelink betweentheschemeandothersimilar actions were analysedinthe context ofthe Impact Assessment andsome ofthem were included in the Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation.
Obustreznemupoštevanjunačelasubsidi-arnosti je bilo v okviru ocene učinka analiziranih več možnosti zaizboljšanje povezave medprogramomindrugimipodobnimi ukrepi, nekatere od njih pa so bile vključene v predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta.
Recommendation 5 Introducing standards at Community level couldhinderthenecessaryflexibilitythe programme must preserve in order to adapt tothevariedcircumstancesofthemost deprived.
Priporočilo 5Z določitvijo standardov na ravni Skupnosti bi se verjetno omejila potrebna prožnost, ki jo moraprogramohraniti,daseprilagodi različnimrazmeram, v katerih živijo najbolj ogroženi.
Recommendation 4 The Commission proposal for a new Council Regulation7includestheremoval ofthis restriction.
Priporočilo 4 Predlog Komisije za novo uredbe Sveta7 določa tudi odpravote omejitve.
83.Byitsverynature,suchaschemehasto adapt to very different situations in the vari-ousparticipating Member States. For this reason, the variety of systems is an essential prerequisite of the proper functioning of the measure.
84.Komisijalahkotudinapodlagisvojihrevi-zijtrdi, da državečlanicenasplošnozado-voljivoizvajajo program,čepravje mogoče nekatera področjašeizboljšati.
The methodfortheallocationoffinancial resourcesistransparentandbasedonthe beststatisticalinformationavailable.Year after year, participating Member States endorsethis method when votinginfavour of the annual plans in the Management Committee.
83.Takprogramse morazaradisvojenarave prilagajatirazličnimrazmeramvrazličnih sodelujočihdržavahčlanicah.Zato morajo bitisistemirazlični,čenajukreppravilno deluje.
The needs offood aid vary hugely between individualaidrecipientsandovertime.
Razlike v količini hrane, ki se razdeli vsakemu prejemniku, ne pomenijo neenake obravnave.
The differencesinthe quantity offood dis-tributedtoeveryindividualaidrecipient canthereforenotbepresentedasunequal treatment.
Metodazadodeljevanjefinančnihsredstev je preglednaintemelji na najboljših dosto-pnihstatističnihpodatkih.Državečlanice vsakoletopodprejoto metodo,kadargla-sujejo v korist letnih načrtov v upravljalnem odboru.
The setting of common standards would not necessarily result in improving the impact of the measurethat, as provenin Box 5 ofthe Court’s report, is very substantial in the light of the share of food distributed by NGOs sourcedfromthe EU programme.
Zdoločitvijoskupnihstandardovsenebi nujnoizboljšalučinekukrepa,kije,kotje razvidno iz okvira 5 poročila Sodišča, zelo pomemben glede na delež živiliz programa EU, kijihrazdelijo NVO.
Recommendation 6 In the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposalfora new Council Regulation, aseriesof measurableobjectiveshas been proposed.
Priporočilo 6V oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog za novo uredbo Sveta,je predlagana vrsta merljivih ciljev.
The Commission will consider introducingcorrespondingperformance indicatorsintheframework oftherevision of the implementing rules after the adoption ofthe new Council Regulation.
Komisija bo po sprejetju nove uredbe Sveta proučila, ali naj uvede ustrezne kazal-nikeučinkovitostivokvirupregledaizved-benih pravil.
The Commission has equally expressed its intention to reinforce Member States’ report-ingobligationsinparticularthroughthe new national food distribution programmes, in orderto ensure a betterfollow-up ofthe scheme andimproveits planning and management overtime.
Komisijajepravtakoizrazilasvojnamen, dapovečaobveznostidržavčlanicglede poročanja,zlastivokvirunovihnacional-nihprogramovrazdeljevanjahrane,dabi zagotovila boljšespremljanje programater sčasomaizboljšalanjegovonačrtovanjein upravljanje.
(EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy and Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) as regards food distribution to the most deprived persons in the Community (COM(2008) 563 final).
Predlog Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1290/2005 o financiranju skupne kmetijske politike in Uredbe (ES) št. 1234/2007 o vzpostavitvi skupne ureditve kmetijskih trgov in o posebnih določbah za nekatere kmetijske proizvode (uredba o enotni SUT) v zvezi z razdeljevanjem hrane najbolj ogroženim osebam v Skupnosti (COM(2008) 563 konč.).
85.Directive2004/18/EConthecoordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and pub-licservicecontracts,providesacommon legal basis throughout the EU.
85.Direktiva 2004/18/ES o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajojavnih naročil gradenj, blaga instoritev,določaskupnopravnopodlago v vsej EU.
The audits carried out bythe Commissionconcludeto the compliance of the call for tenders run by the Member States withthe Directive.
Pri revizijah, ki jih je opravila Komisija,sejeizkazalo, dasojavnirazpisi, kijih vodijo države članice, skladni z Direk-tivo.V Direktivisopredvidenerazlike med državami članicami.
Differences in modalities found in the Member Statesareforeseeninthe Directive.Some-times operatorstake partintenders organ-isedin other Member States.
Dobavitelji včasih sodelujejo najavnihrazpisih,kijih organizirajo druge države članice.
Recommendation 7The Commission already analysed the ques-tionofthetenderingproceduresinthe Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission proposalfor a new Council Regulation including some ideas for enhancing the EU-widepublicityofthetenders. Detailed rules maybelaiddowninthenewimple-mentingrulesaftertheadoptionofanew Council Regulation.
Priporočilo 7Komisija je vprašanje postopkov javnih naročil že analizirala v oceni učinka, ki spremlja predlog Komisije za novo uredbo Sveta, vključno z nekaterimi zamislimi za povečanje medijske pozornostijavnimrazpisom v celi EU.Podrobnapravilabodolahkodoločena vnovihizvedbenihpravilihposprejetju nove uredbe Sveta.
The Commission will examine the proposition of the Court as regards the adaptation of the bartering arrangements without neverthelesspreventingthepossibilityto mobilise intervention stocks as this practice is atthe core ofthescheme.
Komisija bo proučila predlog Sodišča v zvezi sprilagoditvijomehanizmablagovne menjave,nedabipreprečevalavključitev intervencijskihzalog,sajjeta praksa vsre-dišču programa.
Special Report No 6/2009European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009Pomoč Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
MANAGEMENT, THE RESOURCES AND THEIMPACT OF THE EU FOOD
PROGRAMAPOMOČIEVROPSKEUNIJE VHRANI,NAMENJENEGA
PROGRAMME FOR THE MOST DEPRIVED CITIZENS.
NAJBOLJ OGROŽENIM DRŽAVLJANOM.
THE MEASURE WAS
UKREP JE BIL UVEDEN LETA
FIRST INTRODUCED IN 1987, BY USING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS IN
1987,ZA NJEGOVOIZVAJANJESOBILI UPORABLJENIKMETIJSKI
PUBLICINTERVENTION STOCKS, ANDIS STILL APPLIEDIN CERTAIN
PROIZVODI VINTERVENCIJSKIH ZALOGAHIN SE ŠE VEDNOIZVAJA
MEMBER STATES.
V NEKATERIH DRŽAVAH ČLANICAH.
PROGRAMME, ESPECIALLY THAT FOR THE ‘CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS
IZ POROČILA JE RAZVIDNO, DA SO CILJI PROGRAMA, ZLASTI„PRISPEVATI „PRISPEVATI
THE WELLBEING’ OF THE MOST NEEDY REMAIN VALID, AND MAKES A
K BLAGINJI“ OGROŽENIH OSEB, ŠE VEDNO VELJAVNI, HKRATI PA VSEBUJE
OF THE MEASURE.
VRSTO PRIPOROČIL, NAMENJENIH POVEČANJU UČINKA UKREPA.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS n ul l
EVROPSKO RAČUNSKO SODIŠČE n ul l
THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PERSONNEL SELECTION ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY THE EUROPEAN PERSONNEL SELECTION OFFICE
UČINKOVITOST IN USPEŠNOST DEJAVNOSTI ZA IZBOR USLUŽBENCEV, KI JIH IZVAJA EVROPSKI URAD ZA IZBOR OSEBJA
THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PERSONNEL SELECTION ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY THE EUROPEAN PERSONNEL SELECTION OFFICE
UČINKOVITOSTIN USPEŠNOST DEJAVNOSTI ZAIZBOR USLUŽBENCEV, KI JIHIZVAJA EVROPSKI URAD ZAIZBOR OSEBJA
It can be accessed through the europa server (http://europa.eu).
Dostop je mogoč na strežniku Europa (http://europa.eu).
Luxembourg : Publications Oce of the European Union, 2009
Luxembourg: Urad za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti, 2009
AUDIT SCOPE AND AUDIT APPROACH
OBSEG REVIZIJE IN REVIZIJSKI PRISTOP
INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF COMPETITIONS WAS MANAGED EFFECTIVELY
POVEČANJE ŠTEVILA NATEČAJEV SE JE USPEŠNO OBVLADOVALO
LACK OF TIMELY AND CONSISTENT INFORMATION ON THE INSTITUTIONS’ STAFFING NEEDS
POMANJKANJE PRAVOČASNIH IN DOSLEDNIH INFORMACIJ O POTREBAH INSTITUCIJ PO USLUŽBENCIH
THE PERSONNEL SELECTION PROCESS TOOK TOO LONGDELAYS DURING THE COMPETITION PHASE
POSTOPEK IZBORA USLUŽBENCEV JE TRAJAL PREDOLGOZAMUDE V FAZI NATEČAJA