natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Such a finding is not always negative for the complainant, who at least has the benefit of a full explanation from the institution or body concerned of its actions.
Takšna ugotovitev ni nujno slaba za pritožnika, saj ta od institucij e ali organa, ki sta bila obravnavana zaradi nepravilnosti, prejme vsaj celotno pojasnilo. Na primer:
A complainant who asked the Council for access to documents of the European Convention accepted the Council’s explanation that it did not possess the documents concerned.
Pritožnik, ki je prosil Svet za dostop do dokumentov Evropske konvencij e je sprejel razlago Sveta, da teh dokumentov nima.
The complainant also found it useful that the Council had clarified its institutional relationship with the Convention.
Pritožniku se je zdelo koristno tudi, da je Svet pojasnil svojo institucionalno zvezo s Konvencijo.
Furthermore, the complaint led to the agendas and minutes of the Praesidium of the European Convention being published on the Convention’s website as soon as it had fi finished its work (1795/2002/IJH). H).
Posledica pritožbe pa je bila še objava dnevnih redov in zapisnikov delovnega predsedstva Evropske konvencij e na spletni strani Konvencij e takoj, ko je ta zaključila s svojim delom (1795/2002/IJH). H).
The Court of Auditors acknowledged that a complainant’s request for documents had not been dealt with according to its rules on access.
Računsko sodišče je priznalo, da pritožnikova zahteva po vpogledu v dokumente ni bila obravnavana v skladu s pravili o dostopu.
The Court undertook to invite the complainant to provide a detailed indication of the information he needed and to examine the request in accordance with the rules (1117/2003GG).
Sodišče je pozvalo pritožnika, da posreduje podrobnejša dejstva, ki jih potrebuje za odločitev, nakar je zahtevo preučilo v skladu s pravili (1117/2003GG).
A complainant drew the a ention of the European Anti-Fraud Offi ce (OLAF) to alleged irregularities in an EU-funded project.
Pritožnik je pritegnil pozornost Evropskega urada proti goljufijam (OLAF) glede domnevnih nepravilnosti pri projektu, ki je dobil podporo EU.
OLAF investigated but did not report the results to the complainant, who then complained to the Ombudsman.
OLAF se je lotil preiskave, vendar pritožniku ni sporočil rezultatov.
OLAF informed the complainant about the results of the investigation during the Ombudsman’s inquiry (1625/2002/IJH). H).
Ta se je potem pritožil Varuhu in OLAF je pritožnika o rezultatih preiskave obvestil še med preiskavo Varuha (1625/2002/IJH). H).
Cases seled by the institution
Primeri rešeni s strani institucij e
In 48 cases, the Ombudsman’s inquiry resulted in the institution or body concerned se ling the case to the full satisfaction of the complainant.
V 48 primerih je varuhova preiskava v institucijah ali organih pripeljala do rešitev, s katerimi so bili pritožniki popolnoma zadovoljni. Na primer:
Following a complaint to the Ombudsman made on behalf of Stockholm University, the Commission made the final payment due under a research project, apologised for the delay in doing so and agreed to pay interest.
Po pritožbi, ki jo je na Varuha naslovila Univerza v Stockholmu, je Komisij a izplačala predvideni znesek, ki ga je dolgovala za raziskovalni projekt, se opravičila za zamudo in privolila v plačilo obresti.
The Commission also assured the Ombudsman that the financial procedure in which the delay had occurred was now functioning satisfactorily (1173/2003/(TN)IJH). H).
Komisij a je Varuhu tudi zagotovila, da finančni postopek, v okviru katerega je prišlo do zamude, sedaj deluje zadovoljivo (1173/2003/(TN)IJH). H).
A sub-contractor was paid for its services a er the Ombudsman intervened in the case.
Podizvajalec je po posredovanju Varuha prejel plačilo za storitve.
The Commission explained that it could not pay the main contractor involved in the project because of problems with the final report that it had submi ed.
Komisij a je pojasnila, da ni plačala zaradi problemov z zaključnim poročilom, ki ga je predložil glavni izvajalec, udeležen pri projektu.
Once the main contractor submi ed the corrected final report, the Commission made the final payment.
Ko je glavni izvajalec oddal popravljeno zaključno poročilo, je Komisij a izplačala končni znesek.
The main contractor then paid the subcontractor, who thanked the Ombudsman for his help (1960/2002/JMA).
Glavni izvajalec je potem plačal podizvajalcu, ki se je varuhu zahvalil za njegovo pomoč (1960/2002/JMA).
One of the things that distinguishes an ombudsman from a court is the possibility of mediation, which can lead to a positive-sum outcome that satisfies both parties.
Ena od stvari, po kateri se Varuh razlikuje od sodišča je možnost mediacije, ki lahko vodi do pozitivnega rezultata, ustreznega za obe stranki.
When the European Ombudsman finds maladministration, he looks for a friendly solution, if possible.
Ko Evropski varuh odkrije nepravilnost, skuša najti sporazumno rešitev.
This may involve suggesting that the institution concerned should off er compensation to the complainant, without necessarily admi ing liability or se ing a precedent.
Ta lahko vsebuje predlog institucij i v postopku, da ponudi pritožniku nadomestilo, ne da bi morala priznati odgovornost ali postaviti precedens.
While seven proposals for friendly solutions were still under consideration at the end of 2003, four were achieved in the course of the year.
Medtem ko je bilo sedem predlogov za sporazumno rešitev konec leta 2003 še vedno v postopku, so bile štiri dosežene med letom.
These included:
Te vključujejo:
A case in which the Commission agreed to pay additional ex gratia compensation to a complainant in view of the exceptional nature of the case, although it considered that it had no legal obligation to do so.
Primer, v katerem je Komisij a zaradi posebne narave primera privolila v plačilo ex gratia nadomestila pritožnici, čeprav je menila, da je k temu ne zavezuje nobena pravna podlaga.
The complainant worked for the institution and alleged that the Commission had failed to pay her the entire amount of the secretarial allowance to which she was entitled (1166/2002/(SM)IJH). H).
Pritožnica, ki je delala za Komisijo, je leto obtožila, da ji ni plačala celotnega zneska dodatka za tajnice, do katerega je bila upravičena (1166/2002/(SM)IJH). H).
A case in which the Commission agreed to review its decision to seek reimbursement of over € 37 000 from a grant made to a German association.
Primer, v katerem je Komisij a privolila v ponovno preučitev svoje odločitve, da zahteva povrnitev več kot 37.000 evrov donacije nekemu nemškemu združenju.
The Commission expressed its willingness, in the context of a final out-of-court se lement, to abandon its claim if and to the extent it could be shown that the funds had been used in the overall interest of the ultimate beneficiaries of the project.
Komisij a je v kontekstu končne zunajsodne poravnave izrazila pripravljenost, da opusti svojo zahtevo v primeru in do višine, do katere se lahko dokaže, da so bila sredstva uporabljena v popolnem interesu končnih uporabnikov v projektu.
The association maintained its view that there had been no breach of contract on its part, but considered that a friendly solution to its complaint had been brought about (0548/2002/GG).
Združenje je vztrajalo pri svojem mnenju, da ni prišlo do kršitve pogodbe z njihove strani, vendar je menilo, da lahko ugodi sporazumni rešitvi (0548/2002/GG).
Critical remarks
Kritične pripombe
When a friendly solution is not possible, the Ombudsman may close the case with a critical remark or make a dra recommendation.
Ko sporazumna rešitev ni možna, lahko Varuh zaključi primer s kritično pripombo ali pripravi osnutek priporočila.
A critical remark is used if the maladministration appears to have no general implications, it is no longer possible for the institution concerned to eliminate it, and no follow-up action by the Ombudsman seems necessary.
Kritična pripomba se uporabi, če nepravilnost nima splošnega vpliva ali posledice, če je pristojna institucij a ne more več odpraviti ali če ni videti potrebe po spremljanju primera s strani Varuha.
Twenty critical remarks were made during the year.
Med letom je bilo izdanih dvajset kritičnih opomb. Na primer:
The European Anti-Fraud Offi ce (OLAF) published a press release containing allegations of bribery that were likely to be understood as directed against a particular journalist.
Evropski urad proti goljufijam (OLAF) je objavil sporočilo za javnost, v katerem so bile obtožbe o podkupnini, ki se jih je lahko razumelo, da so naperjene proti določenemu novinarju. Novinar se je pritožil Varuhu.
The Ombudsman finally considered that a critical remark could constitute adequate satisfaction for the complainant (1840/2002/GG).
Varuh je na koncu menil, da bi bila lahko kritična pripomba ustrezno zadoščenje za pritožnika (1840/2002/GG).
A complainant’s contract with the European Union Police Mission in Sarajevo was terminated for alleged misconduct.
Pritožnikova pogodba s policijsko misijo Evropske unij e v Sarajevu je bila prekinjena zaradi domnevno nepravilnega ravnanja.
The Ombudsman took the view that it was the Council’s responsibility to ensure that the Mission’s actions respected the rule of law and fundamental rights.
Varuh je menil, da je odgovornost Sveta zagotoviti, da misija pri svojem delovanju spoštuje vladavino prava in temeljne pravice.
A fundamental right of the complainant was infringed because he was not given the opportunity to express his views on the supposed facts of his case.
Temeljne pravice pritožnika so bile kršene, saj mu ni bila dana možnost izjaviti se o dejstvih, očitanih v njegovem primeru.
Since the contract had been terminated more than a year earlier, it was not appropriate to propose a friendly solution and so the Ombudsman closed the case with a critical remark (1200/2003/OV).
Ker je bila pogodba prekinjena pred več kot letom dni, sporazumne rešitve ne bi bilo primerno predlagati, zato je Varuh zaključil primer s kritično pripombo (1200/2003/OV).
The Ombudsman criticised the European Parliament for not complying with the obligation to be courteous in relations with the public.
Varuh je kritiziral Evropski parlament, ker se v odnosih z javnostmi ni spodobno obnašal.
The criticism concerned an email sent in response to inquiries about a call for tenders.
Kritika se je nanašala na elektronsko pošto, ki je bila poslana kot odgovor na poizvedbe pritožnika o javnih razpisih Parlamenta.
The complainant had alleged that the tone of the email was inappropriate and created an impression of arrogant behaviour (1565/2002/GG).
Pritožnik je trdil, da je bil jezik elektronske pošte neprimeren in je dajal vtis arogantnega obnašanja (1565/2002/GG).
A complainant failed to obtain the pass mark in a wri en test in a competition organised by the Council.
Kandidatka na pisnem izpitu za izbor, ki ga je organiziral Svet ni dosegla pozitivne ocene.
When the Council refused to allow her access to her own marked examination script, she turned to the Ombudsman.
Svet ji ni omogočil dostopa do njene ocenjene izpitne pole, zato se je obrnila na Varuha.
A er an inquiry, the Ombudsman made a dra recommendation in favour of access, which the Council accepted.
Po poizvedbi je Varuh pripravil osnutek priporočila v podporo dostopu.
This brought the Council into line with the Commission and the Parliament who agreed in 1999 and 2000, respectively, to give candidates access to their own marked examination scripts (2097/2002/GG).
Osnutek je Svet sprejel in se tako uskladil s Komisij o in Parlamentom, ki sta se 1999 oziroma 2000 strinjala, da omogočita kandidatom dostop do njihovih ocenjenih izpitnih pol (2097/2002/GG).
Two owninitiative inquiries were closed with positive results during the year:
Med letom sta bili s pozitivnim izidom zaključeni dve preiskavi na lastno pobudo :
The European Personnel Selection Offi ce reversed its decision to exclude a Cypriot citizen from a recruitment competition following a complaint about technical difficulties with its electronic registration system.
Evropski urad za izbor osebja je po pritožbi zaradi tehničnih težav z elektronskim prijavnim sistemom razveljavil svojo odločitev o izključitvi ciprskega državljana iz konkuriranja za zaposlitev.
The Ombudsman opened this case as an owninitiative inquiry, because the complainant was neither a citizen nor resident of the Union (OI/4/2003/ADB).
Varuh je ta primer preiskoval na lastno pobudo, saj pritožnik ni bil državljan Unij e niti ni prebival na ozemlju Unij e (OI/4/2003/ADB).
The Commission agreed to adopt a new procedure to inform unsuccessful bidders in tender procedures rapidly and provide for a reasonable delay before the contract is signed.
Komisij a se je strinjala s sprejetjem novega postopka za obveščanje neuspešnih ponudnikov v razpisnih postopkih in določila razumen rok pred podpisom pogodbe.
This is to give bidders time to request the reasons for the award decision and challenge the decision through legal proceedings.
S tem je dala ponudnikom čas, da zahtevajo razloge za sprejeto odločitev in izpodbijajo odločitev v sodnem postopku.
The new procedure is outlined in a Commission Communication of 3 July 2003.
Nov postopek je opisan v sporočilu Komisij e z dne 3. julij a 2003.
The Ombudsman considered that the new procedure complies with the case law of the Court of Justice and suggested that the Commission should systematically inform unsuccessful tenderers of their right to challenge award decisions (OI/2/2002/IJH). H).
Varuh je upošteval, da je nov postopek usklajen s sodno prakso Sodišča in predlagal, da Komisij a neuspešne ponudnike sistematično obvešča o njihovi pravici izpodbijanja danih odločitev (OI/2/2002/IJH). H).
Five owninitiative inquiries were launched in 2003, four of which were still open at the year end.
Štiri od petih preiskav, ki so bile v letu 2003 začete na lastno pobudo, so bile konec leta še vedno odprte.
Two are based on complaints which indicated the possibility of a systemic problem.
Dve temeljita na pritožbah, ki kažejo na možnost sistemskega problema.
The first concerns the internal dispute resolution procedures available to national experts who are seconded to the Commission.
Prva zadeva postopek reševanja notranjih sporov, ki je na razpolago nacionalnim strokovnjakom, dodeljenih Komisij i.
The other concerns the activity of the Commission to promote the good administration of the European Schools.
Druga zadeva dejavnost Komisij e za spodbujanje dobrega upravljanja evropskih šol.
A third owninitiative into a possible systemic problem concerns the integration of persons with disabilities, in particular as regards the measures implemented by the Commission to ensure that persons with disabilities are not discriminated against in their relations with the institution.
Tretja preiskava na lastno pobudo, ki kaže na možno sistemsko težavo, zadeva vključevanje oseb s posebnimi potrebami, še posebej v zvezi z ukrepi, ki jih je sprejela Komisij a in ki zagotavljajo, da osebe s posebnimi potrebami niso diskriminirane v odnosih z institucijami. ami.
To help achieve positive results, the Ombudsman has developed constructive working relations with the EU institutions and bodies.
Za doseganje pozitivnih rezultatov je Varuh razvil konstruktivne delovne odnose z institucijami in organi EU.
In 2003, the Ombudsman met with members and officials of eight institutions, including the Presidents of Parliament, the Court of Justice, the European Investment Bank and the Court of Auditors, the College of Commissioners, and the Directors General of the Commission.
Leta 2003 se je Varuh sestal s člani in uradniki osmih institucij , vključno s predsedniki Parlamenta, Evropskega sodišča, Evropske investicijske banke, Računskega sodišča in kolegija komisarjev ter generalnim direktorjem Komisije.
During these meetings, the Ombudsman emphasised that his role includes mediation and that friendly solutions are a positive outcome both for the complainant and the institution or body concerned.
Na teh sestankih je Varuh poudaril, da nastopa tudi v vlogi mediatorja in da so sporazumne rešitve ustrezne tako za pritožnika kot pristojno institucij o ali organ.
The active cooperation of the institutions and bodies is also essential in ensuring that everyone who might have reason to complain to the Ombudsman receives information about their right to do so and how to exercise that right.
Aktivno sodelovanje institucij in organov je bistveno tudi pri obveščanju vseh morebitnih upravičenih pritožnikov o njihovi pravici do pritožbe Varuhu kot tudi o tem, kako naj jo uveljavljajo.
The Commission responded positively to the Ombudsman’s
Sodelovanje vključuje tudi medsebojno prenašanje primerov, ko je to potrebno.
The Ombudsman also frequently advises complainants of the possibility to address a petition to the European Parliament, especially if the complainant wants a change in European law or policy.
POVZETEK obstaja kot prednostna postavka in bo vztrajal pri prizadevanjih za njegovo vključitev v končno besedilo Ustave.
Cooperation with ombudsmen throughout Europe
Sodelovanje z ombudsmani po vsej Evropi
The European Ombudsman co-operates with an extensive network of ombudsmen and similar bodies in Europe.
Evropski varuh sodeluje s široko mrežo ombudsmanov in podobnimi organi v Evropi.
The network now covers 90 offices in 30 countries, comprising offices at the national and regional levels within the European Union and at the national level in the applicant countries for EU membership, Norway and Iceland.
Mreža danes pokriva 90 uradov v 30 državah, vključno s pisarnami na nacionalnih in regionalnih ravneh znotraj Evropske unij e in na nacionalni ravni v državah prosilkah za članstvo v EU, na Norveškem in Islandiji. i.
Cooperation through the network concerns both complaint handling and provision of information to citizens.
Sodelovanje preko mreže zadeva tako obravnavanje pritožb kot obveščanje državljanov.
Many complainants turn to the European Ombudsman when they have problems with a national, regional or local administration.
Na Evropskega varuha se obrne mnogo pritožnikov, ki imajo težave z nacionalnim, regionalnim ali lokalnim upravnim organom.
Although these complaints are outside the mandate of the European Ombudsman, in many cases an ombudsman in the State concerned can provide an effective remedy.
Čeprav so te pritožbe zunaj pristojnosti Evropskega varuha, lahko v veliko primerih ombudsman v pristojni državi zagotovi učinkovito pravno sredstvo.
The European Ombudsman transfers cases directly to national and regional ombudsmen, when possible, or gives suitable advice to the complainant.
Ko je to mogoče, prenese Evropski varuh primere neposredno na nacionalne in regionalne ombudsmane, ali da ustrezen nasvet pritožniku.
The ombudsmen in the network are also well placed to help inform citizens about their rights under European law and about how to exercise and defend their rights.
Ombudsmani v mreži so primerni tudi za to, da pomagajo obveščati prebivalce o pravicah, ki jih imajo po evropskem zakonu in o tem kako svoje pravice uveljavljati in braniti.
In 2003, the cooperation was intensified, with meetings of national and regional ombudsmen from the Member States and of national ombudsmen from the candidate countries.
V letu 2003 so sodelovanje okrepili s srečanji nacionalnih in regionalnih ombudsmanov iz držav članic in nacionalnih ombudsmanov iz držav kandidatk.
The 4th Seminar of the National Ombudsmen and Similar Bodies in the EU Member States, on the theme “Ombudsmen and the Protection of Rights in the European Union”, was organised jointly by the European Ombudsman and the Greek Ombudsman in Athens in April.
Četrti seminar nacionalnih ombudsmanov in podobnih organov v državah članicah EU na temo “Ombudsmani in varstvo pravic v Evropski uniji” sta aprila v Atenah skupaj organizirala evropski in grški ombudsman.
The European Parliament was represented by the President of the Commi ee on Petitions, Mr Vitaliano Gemelli.
Evropski parlament je zastopal predsednik odbora za peticije, g. Vitaliano Gemelli.
The 4th Meeting of EU Regional Ombudsmen and similar bodies, at which the offi ce of the European Ombudsman was represented, was held in Valencia in April under the sponsorship of the Sindic de Greuges de Valencia (regional ombudsman).
Četrto srečanje regionalnih ombudsmanov in podobnih organov EU, na katerem je bil zastopan urad Evropskega varuha, je potekalo aprila v Valenciji pod pokroviteljstvom “Sindic de Greuges de Valencia” (regionalnega ombudsmana).
Among the topics discussed were the future of Europe, immigration and asylum and the protection of the environment.
Obravnavane teme so bile: prihodnost Evrope, priseljevanje in azil ter varstvo okolja.
In May, the European Ombudsman joined the national ombudsmen from the applicant countries a ending the conference organised by the Ombudsman of Poland, Andrzej Zoll, in Warsaw.
Maja se je Evropski varuh pridružil nacionalnim ombudsmanom iz držav prosilk in se udeležil konference, ki jo je v Varšavi organiziral poljski ombudsman Andrzej Zoll.
This meeting was entitled “Ombudsman and the Law of the European Union”.
Naslov tega srečanja je bil “ombudsman in zakonodaja Evropske unije”. e”.
The European Ombudsman’s network also consists of liaison officers, nominated in each national ombudsman’s offices to act as a first point of contact for other members of the network.
Mreža Evropskega varuha je sestavljena iz uradnikov za zvezo, ki so imenovani v vsakem nacionalnem uradu ombudsmana kot kontaktne osebe za člane mreže.
In December 2003, the liaison officers came together for a meeting in Strasbourg to discuss “European information, advice and justice for all”.
Decembra 2003 so se uradniki za zvezo sestali v Strasbourgu in razpravljali na temo “Evropsko obveščanje, svetovanje in pravica za vse”.
This was the first such meeting to include liaison officers from the ten countries that will join the Union in 2004.
Na sestanku so prvič sodelovali tudi uradniki za zvezo desetih držav, ki se bodo priključile Unij i leta 2004.
Between meetings, the network functions through three communications initiatives of the European Ombudsman: the European Ombudsmen – Newsle er, a bi-annual publication issued jointly with the European Region of the International Ombudsman Institute; Ombudsman Daily News,
Med posameznimi srečanji se člani mreže obveščajo na tri načine: preko Glasila evropskih ombudsmanov (European Ombudsmen - Newsle er), polletne publikacije, izdane v sodelovanju z evropsko sekcijo Mednarodnega združenja ombudsmanov; preko Dnevnih novic ombudsmana (Ombudsman Daily News), to je elektronskih novic, ki jih ureja Evropski varuh in preko interaktivnih spletnih konferenc.
Communication relating to a proposal for basic acts for grants currently covered by the Commission’s administrative autonomy or institutional prerogatives (COM (2003)274 final). final).
Glavna naloga Varuha je odnos z državljani in obveščanje le-teh o njihovih pravicah, vključno s pravico pritožiti se Evropskemu varuhu. Konec maja 2003 je Varuh napovedal, da namerava pred datumom širitve, 1. majem 2004, obiskati vseh deset držav pristopnic in čim več držav članic.
At the end of May 2003, the Ombudsman announced his intention to visit all ten accession countries before 1 May 2004, the date of enlargement, and as many of the Member States as possible.
Skozi vse leto, posebej pa med dnevi odprtih vrat, ki jih je v maju organiziral Evropski parlament, je bilo razdeljenega veliko gradiva o delu Evropskega varuha.
The cooperation of the national ombudsman offices in the countries concerned, as well as of the European Parliament and European Commission representations, made an important contribution to the success of these visits.
Informacij e so bile prav tako dostopne na spletni strani Varuha, kjer so bile redno objavljane odločitve varuha, sporočila za medije, statistika in podrobnosti o komunikacijskih dejavnostih Varuha.
Material about the work of the European Ombudsman was distributed widely throughout the year, in particular during the Open Days organised by the European Parliament in May.
Varuh je nadaljeval z razvijanjem ustvarjalnih delovnih odnosov z mediji: šestkrat se je srečal z novinarji in imel osem tiskovnih konferenc, na katerih je razložil in predstavil svoje delo.