natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In the second approach, growth is driven by the stock of human capital, whichdetermines the capacity of a country to create new technologies and to absorb newtechnologies developed in other countries. This alternative approach sets out to
… medtem ko drugi modeli povezujejozaloge človeškega kapitala z ustvarjanjem in sprejemanjem nove tehnologije.
… while other models link the stock ofhuman capital to the creation andabsorption of new technologies.
Pri drugem pristopu rast poganjajo zaloge človeškega kapitala, kar določa sposobnost države ustvarjati tehnologijo in sprejemati novo tehnologijo, razvito v drugihdržavah.
Employment in Europe 2006 explain the difference in growth rates between countries in terms of differences inhuman capital stocks, thus in the ability of countries to create and absorb newtechnologies.
Zaposlovanje v Evropi 2006 smislu razlik v zalogah človeškega kapitala in s tem v sposobnosti držav ustvarjati in sprejemati novo tehnologijo.
It sees education as especially important for jobs requiring innovation and adaptation to change, which are growing fast in a knowledgebased economy. A skilled workforce is better at creating and absorbing new technologies andtherefore at generating technological progress.
Izobraževanje obravnava kot posebej pomembno za delovna mesta, ki zahtevajo inovativnost in sposobnost prilagajanja spremembam in število katerih hitro narašča v gospodarstvu, ki temelji na znanju.Usposobljena delovna sila je bolj sposobna ustvarjati in sprejemati novotehnologijo, s tem pa tudi doseči tehnološki napredek.
In a knowledgebased economy, a highskilled and adaptable workforce isessential for growth.
Vgospodarstvu, ki temelji na znanju, jevisoko usposobljena in prilagodljivadelovna sila bistvenega pomena zarast.
Since human capital and technology are seen as key determinants of EU's productivity, this alternative approach has been adopted to examine empirically the growtheffects of a highskilled workforce through technological progress in the EU Member States.
Človeški kapital in tehnologija sta ključna dejavnika za produktivnost EU, zato jebil sprejet ta alternativni pristop za empirično preučevanje učinkov visokousposobljene delovne sile in tehnološkega napredka na rast v državah članicah EU.
However, especially in a knowledgebased economy where technological progress can create an economic imbalance, it is not only the level of humancapital or its composition but also adaptability that matters for economic growth.Adaptability of workers is crucial for effective reallocation of resources in responseto changes in economic conditions.
Vendar pa za gospodarsko rast nista pomembni samo raven ali sestavačloveškega kapitala, temveč tudi prilagodljivost, zlasti v gospodarstvu, ki temeljina znanju in v katerem tehnološki napredek lahko vodi do gospodarskega neravnovesja. Prilagodljivost delavcev je ključnega pomena za učinkovito prerazporeditev sredstev v odgovor na spremembe gospodarskih razmer.
Although the capacity to adapt to change is oneof the main features of a well-educated workforce, it is reasonable to assume thatthe degree of adaptability of the workforce is sensitive to the forms of work organisations workers face.
Čeprav jesposobnost prilagajanja spremembam ena glavnih značilnosti dobro izobraženedelovne sile, je upravičeno domnevati, da na stopnjo prilagodljivosti delovne silevplivajo oblike organizacije dela, s katerimi se delavci soočajo.
Consequently, the growth effects of a skilled workforce mayhave different magnitudes depending on whether the work environment is designedto encourage the effective use of the adaptability of the skilled workers for technological progress.
Posledično selahko razsežnosti učinkov usposobljene delovne sile na rast razlikujejo, kar jeodvisno od tega, ali delovno okolje spodbuja učinkovito uporabo prilagodljivosti usposobljenih delavcev za tehnološki napredek.
An estimation of panel data from 14 EUMember States suggests the importanceof a skilled workforce for technologicalprogress through technology creationand absorption …
Ocena panelnih podatkov iz 14 državčlanic EU kaže na pomembnostusposobljene delovne sile za tehnološkinapredek s pomočjo ustvarjanja insprejemanja tehnologije …
To assess these assumptions, a model using panel data in 14 EU Member Stateswith observations for every five years between 1960 and 2000 is used.
Te domneve se ocenjujejo s pomočjo modela, ki uporablja panelne podatke iz 14držav članic EU z ugotovitvami za vsakih pet let od leta 1960 do 2000.
It estimatesthe impact of highskilled labour, measured here in terms of fraction of adult population with tertiary education in total adult population, on technological progress.An important distinction is made between the impact of highskilled labour on acountry's capacity to innovate and on its ability to catch up with the technologyleader.
Modelocenjuje vpliv visoko usposobljene delovne sile, ki je tukaj prikazana kot deležodraslega prebivalstva z višješolsko izobrazbo v skupnem obsegu odraslega prebivalstva, na tehnološki napredek.
The speed of the latter is a function of both the proportion of high-skilledworkers in the workforce and its distance to the technology frontier.
Pri tem se jasno razlikuje med vplivom visokousposobljene delovne sile na inovativnost države in na njeno sposobnost dohitetitehnološko najbolj razvito državo.
As a countrynears the technology frontier the impact of technology adoption weakens and theability to innovate domestically gains importance.
Hitrost dohajanja je odvisna od deleža visokousposobljenih delavcev v delovni sili in oddaljenosti države od tehnološke meje.Čim bliže je država tehnološki meji, tem manjši je vpliv sprejemanja tehnologijein tem pomembnejša postane inovativnost te države.
The results suggest a positiveimpact of skilled labour on the ability of EU Member States to create domestically new technologies and to absorb technologies developed abroad.
Rezultati kažejo na pozitiven vpliv usposobljene delovne sile na sposobnost držav članic EU ustvarjati novotehnologijo in sprejemati tehnologijo, razvito v tujini.
… but a working environment facilitating adaptability matters too in countries close to the technology frontier.
… toda v državah, ki so blizutehnološke meje, je prav tako pomembno delovno okolje, ki lajša prilagodljivost.
The empirical results also support the assumption that the effects on technologicalprogress will be more significant in countries that are closer to the technologicalfrontier and where the working environment supports the capacity of high-skilledworkers to adapt to changes in economic conditions.
Empirični rezultati prav tako podpirajo domnevo, da so učinki na tehnološkinapredek večji v državah, ki so bliže tehnološki meji in v katerih delovno okoljeprispeva k sposobnosti visoko usposobljenih delavcev prilagajati se spremembam gospodarskih razmer.
Indeed, a combination of ahigh-skilled workforce and a flexible working environment enhances the ability ofcountries to create new technologies.
Kombinacija visoko usposobljenih delavcev inprožnega delovnega okolja dejansko izboljšuje sposobnost držav ustvarjati novotehnologijo.
The overall share of EU workers living inanother Member State is relatively small,but varies from country to country.
Skupni delež delavcev EU, ki živijo vdrugi državi članici, je relativno majhen,vendar se od države do države razlikuje.
Geographic labour mobility of EU citizens remains a limited phenomenon bothrelative to the total EU population and compared to migration from third countriesto the EU.
Geografska mobilnost državljanov EU na trgu dela je še vedno skromna, takoglede na skupno število prebivalstva EU kot v primerjavi z migracijami iz tretjihdržav v EU.
Currently, less than 2% of EU working age citizens live in another EUMember State, the biggest majority of them from the old 15 Member States.
Trenutno v drugi državi članici živi manj kot 2 % delovno sposobnihdržavljanov EU, pri čemer jih velika večina prihaja iz starih 15 držav članic.
Thisis less than 20% of the total foreign-born labour force of the EU.
To jemanj kot 20 % skupnega števila na tujem rojenih delavcev EU.
There are nevertheless, substantial differences across Member States.
Vendar pa obstajajo znatne razlike med državami članicami.
Current labour mobility flows are low, with official statistics showing only 0.1%of the EU-15 national labour force changing its place of residence from one Mem-
Trenutni tokovi mobilnosti delovne sile so nizki, po uradni statistiki vsako letosamo 0,1 % nacionalne delovne sile EU-15 zamenja stalno prebivališče v eni
Executive summary mobility from the new to the old Member States remains limited.
Povzetek novih v stare države članice pa je ševedno skromna.
ber State to another every year.
državi članici s stalnim prebivališčem v drugi državi članici.
Mobility rates with respect to flows of workersfrom the EU-10 to the EU-15 after enlargement have been limited according to theevidence so far and the flow from EU-15 to EU-10 Member States has been largely negligible.
Stopnja mobilnostiglede na tokove delavcev iz EU-10 v EU-15 po širitvi je po obstoječih podatkihskromna, tokovi iz držav članic EU-15 v EU-10 pa so v veliki meri zanemarljivi.
Regional mobility rates in the EU aresignificantly higher, but comparisonswith the US still suggest a potential forincrease.
Stopnja regionalne mobilnosti v EU jeznatno višja, toda glede na primerjavez ZDAše vedno obstajajo možnosti zaizboljšave.
Regional mobility within Member States is significantly higher than cross-bordermobility, although regional mobility rates between countries vary greatly and aresubstantially lower in the new Member States compared with the old Member States.
Regionalna mobilnost znotraj držav članic je bistveno višja kot čezmejna mobilnost, čeprav se stopnje regionalne mobilnosti med državami močno razlikujejo inso v novih državah članicah znatno nižje kot v starih državah članicah.
Overall, geographic mobility rates in the EU are lower than in the US.Although not as wide as sometimes claimed, the existing mobility gap with the USsuggests that there may be a potential for higher mobility in the EU.
Skupnastopnja geografske mobilnosti v EU je nižja kot v ZDA. Obstoječa razlika vmobilnosti med EU in ZDA, čeprav ta ni tako velika, kot je včasih prikazana,nakazuje na možnosti za povečanje mobilnosti v EU.
EU-15 movers are on average young,highly educated, single, without children and tend to work in high-skilledwhite-collar positions.
Migranti EU-15 so v povprečju mladi,visoko izobraženi, neporočeni, nimajootrok in običajno delajo kot visokousposobljeni uslužbenci.
Internationally mobile EU-15 citizens tend to work in highskilled white-collarpositions and are significantly younger, better educated, mostly single and lesslikely to have children than the total labour force and migrants from non-EU countries.
Mednarodno mobilni državljani EU-15 običajno delajo kot visoko usposobljeniuslužbenci in so v primerjavi s skupno delovno silo in migranti iz držav nečlanic EU bistveno mlajši, bolje izobraženi, večinoma neporočeni in verjetno nimajootrok.
Their skill level has increased since 2000, and there seems to be a trend tohigher mobility among older workers.
Njihova raven znanj se je od leta 2000 povišala, pojavlja pa se tudi trendvečje mobilnosti med starejšimi delavci.
Mobile workers from the new Member States tend to be even younger, with ahigher proportion of women, havingmostly medium skill levels and tendingto work in complementary sectors andoccupations.
Mobilni delavci iz novih držav članic soobičajno še mlajši in med njimi je velikdelež žensk. Njihova raven znanj jevečinoma srednja, običajno pa delajo vdopolnilnih sektorjih in poklicih.
Compared to their EU-15 counterparts, internationally mobile workers from the EU-10 Member States are even younger, show a higher share of female workersand are significantly less likely to be highly educated, but include a very highshare of medium-skilled persons.
Vprimerjavi z migranti v EU-15 so mednarodno mobilni delavci iz držav članic EU-10 še mlajši in med njimi je velik delež žensk. Bistveno manj verjetno je, daso visoko izobraženi, vendar pa jih je zelo veliko srednje usposobljenih.
They are therefore less likely to be in highskilled positions, but have a substantially higher concentration in skilled blue collar and elementary occupations, which would suggest their complementary role inthe host countries' economies.
Zato jezanje manj verjetno, da delajo na položajih, ki zahtevajo visoko usposobljenost,toda velika večina jih dela kot usposobljeni proizvodni in pomožni delavci, karkaže na njihovo dopolnilno vlogo v gospodarstvih države gostiteljice.
Employment rates of EU-10 movers arestill lower than the average of EU-15,but have been improving rapidly.
Stopnja zaposlenosti migrantov EU-10je še vedno nižja od povprečja EU-15,vendar se hitro izboljšuje.
The employment rates of mobile EU-15 citizens are very similar, if not higher thanthose of the total working age population.
Stopnja zaposlenosti mobilnih državljanov EU-15 je zelo podobna, če ne celovišja od skupnega števila delovno sposobnega prebivalstva.
Employment rates of EU-10 citizensresident in the old Member States have increased considerably over recent years,are close to those of the overall population and EU-15 movers, and substantiallyhigher than for non-EU nationals.
Stopnja zaposlenostidržavljanov EU-10 s stalnim prebivališčem v starih državah članicah se je v zadnjem času bistveno povečala. Je blizu skupnega števila prebivalstva in številamigrantov EU-15 ter znatno višja od stopnje zaposlenosti nedržavljanov EU.
Data show some limited increase inexpected future mobility for most countries.
Podatki kažejo na omejeno povečanjepričakovane prihodnje mobilnosti zavečino držav.
Expected mobility levels from the EU-8 countries to the old Member States are unlikely to pose problems fortheir labour markets.
Malo verjetno je, da bopričakovana raven mobilnosti iz držav EU-8 v stare države članice problematična za njihove trge dela.
Survey data on the intention of European citizens to move to another country in thenext five years indicate that cross-border mobility between the EU-15 Member States is likely to increase somewhat but probably not greatly in the short and medium term.
Podatki raziskav o nameri evropskih državljanov glede selitve v drugo državo vnaslednjih petih letih nakazujejo, da se bo čezmejna mobilnost med državamičlanicami EU-15 kratko- in srednjeročno gledano verjetno nekoliko povečala,vendar pa verjetno ne v veliki meri.
Among the EU-8 countries, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia have expected mobility rates which are below that of most old Member States.
Med državami EU-8 je na Češkem,Madžarskem, Slovaškem in v Sloveniji pričakovana stopnja mobilnosti nižja odstopnje v večini starih držav članic.
Expected mobility from the three Baltic countries and Poland is significantly higher than that from the rest of the Member States, but this is unlikely to posemajor and lasting challenges for the labour markets of the receiving countries.Looking at longer-term developments, demographics are likely to act as a brake onmobility, particularly because of a decrease in the younger age group, which hastended to be the most mobile.
Pričakovana mobilnost v treh baltskih državahin na Poljskem je znatno višja kot v ostalih državah članicah, vendar je malo verjetno, da bo to velik in dolgotrajen izziv za trge dela držav gostiteljic. Dolgoročnogledano bo demografski razvoj verjetno zaviral mobilnost, zlasti zaradi upada vmlajši starostni skupini, ki je običajno najbolj mobilna.
Efforts to increase geographic mobilityin the EU need to continue, both interms of further reducing legal andadministrative barriers and tackling thesocial, cultural, educational and infrastructure barriers.
Prizadevanja za povečanje geografskemobilnosti v EU se morajo nadaljevati,tako v smislu nadaljnjega zmanjševanja pravnih in administrativnih ovir kotodpravljanja socialnih, kulturnih, izobraževalnih in infrastrukturnih zaprek.
Given the relatively low mobility levels in Europe, it is essential to further fosterthe free movement of workers as one of the fundamental freedoms of Europeancitizens and for its contribution to a better functioning of labour markets.
Nadaljevati se morajo prizadevanja za zmanjševanje in odpravljanje obstoječih pravnih in administrativnih ovir zamobilnost, vključno s prehodno ureditvijo za prosti pretok delavcev iz novih državčlanic.
Effortsto further reduce and remove existing legal and administrative barriers to mobility,including the transitional arrangements for the free movement of workers fromnew Member States, need to continue.
Toda tudi če se odstranijo vse administrativne in informacijske ovire zamobilnost, so socialne, kulturne, izobraževalne in infrastrukturne zapreke ševedno glavna težava.
However, even if all administrative barriersand information hurdles to mobility were removed, the social, cultural, educational and infrastructure barriers to mobility would still remain as the main obstacles.Tackling these obstacles will require policy actions aimed at fostering the integration and acceptance of newcomers, providing more attractive urban environments
Odpravljanje teh zaprek zahteva ukrepe za spodbujanje integracije in sprejemanja novo prispelih priseljencev, zagotavljanje privlačnejšihurbanih okolij in stanovanjskih trgov, izboljševanje jezikovnega znanja, dvigovanje ravni izobrazbe ter za pomoč mladim pri pridobivanju prvih izkušenj mobilnosti s pomočjo študija ali pripravništva v tujini.
Employment in Europe 2006 and housing markets, improving language skills, raising educational levels, andhelping young people to gain first mobility experiences through studies or internships abroad.
Zaposlovanje v Evropi 2006
Geographic mobility represents a crucial element in the strategy to cope with thecurrent and future labour market challenges in the enlarged EU.
Geografska mobilnost je ključni element strategije za soočanje s trenutnimi in prihodnjimi izzivi trga dela v razširjeni EU.
However, in orderto provide an efficient policy response to these challenges, policies on geographicmobility need to be coupled with actions in the field of other employment policies, education and immigration.
Za zagotovitev učinkovitega odziva nate izzive pa je treba politike geografske mobilnosti povezati z ukrepi na področjudrugih politik zaposlovanja, izobraževanja in priseljevanja.
Despite further progress in the employment situation in the EU, reaching the Lisbon target remains a challenge.
Kljub nadaljnjemu napredku prizaposlovanju v EU je doseganjelizbonskega cilja še vedno izziv.
The employment situation in the enlarged EU continued to improve in 2005despite the slowdown in economic growth.
Stanje na področju zaposlovanja v razširjeni EU se je v letu 2005 nenehnoizboljševalo kljub začasni upočasnitvi gospodarske rasti.
Further progress was achieved in termsof overall, female and particularly older worker employment rates; though reaching the overall Lisbon employment target remains a major challenge.
Nadaljnji napredek je bildosežen pri skupni stopnji zaposlenosti ter pri stopnji zaposlenosti žensk in zlastistarejših delavcev, toda doseganje skupnega lizbonskega cilja zaposlenosti je ševedno velik izziv.
Increasedefforts will be needed in all three priority areas identified by the Employment Guidelines; namely attracting and retaining more people in employment, increasing labour supply and modernising social protection systems; improving theadaptability of workers and enterprises; and increasing the investment in humancapital through better education and skills.
Potrebno je vložiti več truda na vseh treh prednostnih področjih,določenih v smernicah zaposlovanja, in sicer privabiti več ljudi k zaposlitvi in jihobdržati v delovnem razmerju, povečati ponudbo delovne sile in posodobiti sisteme socialne zaščite, izboljšati prilagodljivost delavcev in podjetij ter povečativlaganja v človeški kapital s pomočjo boljše izobrazbe in znanj.
Member States need to identify andimplement comprehensive reform packages aimed at enhancing the flexibilityand security of their labour markets…
Države članice morajo pripraviti inizvesti celovite svežnje reform zaizboljšanje prožnosti in varnosti svojihtrgov dela …
The conclusions of the last Joint Employment Report stressed the importance of acomprehensive approach to reform in the face of rapid structural changes broughtabout by ageing and globalisation.
Sklepi zadnjega skupnega poročila o zaposlovanju so poudarili pomembnostcelovitega pristopa k reformam zaradi hitrih strukturnih sprememb, ki so posledica staranja in globalizacije.
The findings of this year's Employment in Europe corroborate this assertion.
Ugotovitve letošnjega poročila o zaposlovanju v Evropi to trditev potrjujejo.
The Member States need to identify and implement appropriate combinations of policies enhancing both the flexibility and security of their respective labour markets.
Države članice morajo pripraviti in izvesti ustreznekombinacije politik za izboljšanje prožnosti in varnosti svojih posameznih trgovdela.
While there is clearly no single flexicuritysolution for all, and adopted reforms will need to reflect the specific situation ineach Member State, a comprehensive reform approach encompassing all the keyelements – modern labour laws, active labour market policies, lifelong learningsystems and modern social security systems – may not only deliver better employment outcomes, but also prove to be more politically feasible.
Očitno ne obstaja ena sama rešitev „prožne varnosti“ za vse in pri sprejetihreformah je treba upoštevati posebne razmere v vsaki državi članici. Celovitpristop k reformam, ki vključuje vse ključne elemente – sodobno delovno pravo,aktivne politike trga dela, sisteme vseživljenjskega učenja in sodobne sistemesocialne varnosti – morda ne bo prinesel le boljših rezultatov zaposlovanja,temveč se bo tudi izkazal za politično bolj izvedljivega.
…in order to progress toward fulfillingthe EES objectives within the framework of the renewed Lisbon Agenda.
… z namenom napredovati na poti douresničitve ciljev evropske strategijezaposlovanja v okviru obnovljenelizbonske agende.
Looking in some more detail into the individual policy areas, this Employment in Europe highlights the need to create a stronger culture of the evaluation of labourmarket policies, to invest in a highskilled and adaptable workforce, and to fosterthe free movement of workers in the enlarged EU.
To poročilo o zaposlovanju v Evropi, ki nudi podroben vpogled v posameznapodročja politik, poudarja potrebo po močnejši kulturi ocenjevanja politik trgadela, vlaganju v visoko usposobljeno in prilagodljivo delovno silo ter spodbujanju prostega pretoka delavcev v razširjeni EU.
These are some of the policyactions that will be needed in order to progress toward fulfilling the objectives ofthe European Employment Strategy within the broader framework of the relaunched Lisbon Agenda.
To so nekateri ukrepi, ki so potrebni za napredovanje na poti k uresničitvi ciljev evropske strategije zaposlovanja vširšem okviru obnovljene lizbonske agende.
European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development
Evropska komisija Kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja
RECIPES USING ORGANIC PRODUCTS
UPORABA RAZLIČNIH EKOLOŠKIH IZDELKOV
GOOD FOR NATURE, GOOD FOR YOU.
DOBRO ZA NARAVO, DOBRO ZATE.
When agriculture becomes organic farming
Ko poljedelstvo postane ekološko kmetovanje
What is organic farming?
Kaj je ekološko kmetovanje?
Organic farming is all about producing fresh, tasty and healthy foods in a way that respects thenatural environment and animal welfare.
Ekološko kmetovanje obsega pridelavo sveže, okusne in zdrave hrane na način, ki spoštuje naravno okolje in dobro počutje živali.
ers and pesticides, and that animals are reared without reliance on the many drugs and chemicals that are commonly used in intensive livestock production.
pesticidov ter da so živali rejene brez pomoči mnogih zdravil in kemikalij, ki se pogosto uporabljajo pri konvencionalni reji živine.