natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission confirmed that it would strive to take the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises into account in future standard contracts, to the extent that this is compatible with the Community's financial interests and the legislative provisions in force. (530/2004/GG)
Komis` a je potrdila, da si bo toliko prizadevala upoštevati interese majhnih in srednje velikih podjet` v prihodnjih tipskih pogodbah, da bo to v skladu s fi na n Ï ni mi interesi in veljavnimi zakonodajnimi doloÏbami Skupnosti. (530/2004/GG)
The Ombudsman criticised OLAF in respect of its handling of information that a German oU cial had submimed to it about suspected illegalities at a Community body.
• Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je kritiziral OLAF zaradi njegove obravnave informac` , ki mu jih je predložil nemški uradnik v zvezi z domnevnimi nepravilnostmi v organu Skupnosti.
The complainant alleged lack of information from OLAF regarding the period that could reasonably be deemed necessary for it to investigate his complaint.
Pritožnik je trdil, da mu OLAF ni posredoval dovolj informac` o obdobju, ki ga lahko upraviÏeno šteje kot potrebnega za preiskavo njegove pritožbe.
The Ombudsman found that the rules required OLAF to provide the whistle-blower with information as to the period of time within which it expected to conclude its investigation. (140/2004/PB)
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je ugotovil, da so pravila od OLAF zahtevala, da vložniku pritožbe zagotovi informac` e o obdobju, v katerem priÏakuje konec svoje preiskave. (140/2004/PB)
It is important for the institutions and bodies to follow-up critical remarks from the Ombudsman, taking action to resolve outstanding problems and avoid maladministration in the future.
Za instituc` e in organe je pomembno, da spremljajo kritiÏne pripombe varuha Ïlovekovih pravic in ukrepajo pri reševanju spornih vprašanj ter se na ta naÏin izognejo nepravilnostim v prihodnje.
During 2005, the Commission informed the Ombudsman of its follow-up on 18 critical remarks, including:
Leta 2005 je tako Komis` a obvestila varuha o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi z 18 kritiÏnimi pripombami, med drugim:
A case in which the Ombudsman criticised the Commission for failing to provide an adequate explanation for the length of an investigation, which had taken just under three years. The
• Primer, v katerem je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic Komis` o kritiziral, ker ni zagotovila ustrezne razlage za dolžino preiskave, ki je trajala skoraj tri leta.
Commission, which had referred to general factors, such as a heavy workload, that may cause delays, informed the Ombudsman that it would endeavour to give a more precise explanation should a similar case arise in the future. (2229/2003/MHZ)
Komis` a, ki se je sklicevala na splošne dejavnike, kot je velika delovna obremenjenost, ki lahko povzroÏajo zamudo, je varuha Ïlovekovih pravic obvestila, da si bo ob morebitnem podobnem primeru v prihodnosti prizadevala za natanÏnejšo razlago. (2229/2003/MHZ)
A case in which the Ombudsman criticised the response of the Commission's Representation in Copenhagen to a complainant's request for information about the processing of data relating to him.
• Primer, v katerem je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic kritiziral odgovor Predstavništva Komis` e v Københavnu na zahtevo pritožnika po informac`ah o obdelavi podatkov, ki se nanj nanašajo.
The Commission expressed its regret that its Representation had breached the Community's data protection rules and stated that it would remind the Representation that the data protection rules must always be respected. (224/2004/PB)
Komis` a je izrazila obžalovanje, da je njeno predstavništvo kršilo pravila Skupnosti o varstvu podatkov, in izjavila, da bo predstavništvo opozorila, da je treba pravila o varstvu podatkov vedno upoštevati. (224/2004/PB)
In cases where maladministration is particularly serious, or has general implications, or if it is still possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the maladministration, the Ombudsman normally makes a draW recommendation.
V primerih, ko so nepravilnosti še posebej resne oziroma imajo splošne posledice, ali Ïe je še vedno mogoÏe, da instituc` e nepravilnosti odprav`o, varuh Ïlovekovih pravic sestavi osnutek priporoÏila.
The institution or body concerned must respond to the Ombudsman with a detailed opinion within three months.
Zadevna instituc` a ali organ mora varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic v roku treh mesecev posredovati podrobno mnenje.
During 2005, 20 draW recommendations were made.
Leta 2005 je bilo sestavljenih 20 osnutkov priporoÏil.
In addition, eight draW recommendations from 2004 led to decisions in 2005.
LETNO POROČILO 2005
Nine cases were closed during the year when a draW recommendation was accepted by the institution.
POVZETEK prejela osnutek priporoÏila.
Three cases led to a special report to the European Parliament.
Tr`e primeri so privedli do posebnega poroÏila Evropskemu parlamentu.
Six cases were closed for other reasons.
Šest primerov je bilo zakljuÏenih iz drugih razlogov.
At the end of 2005, 11 draW recommendations were still under consideration, including one made in 2004.
Konec leta 2005 se je še vedno preuÏevalo 11 osnutkov priporoÏil, vkljuÏno z enim iz leta 2004.
The following were among those that were accepted in 2005:
Naslednji primeri spadajo med osnutke priporoÏil, sprejete leta 2005:
The Commission agreed to pay compensation of EUR 56 000 to a French journalist.
• Komis` a se je strinjala, da bo francoskemu novinarju plaÏala odškodnino v višini 56 000 EUR.
This was the biggest compensation payment ever resulting from a complaint to the Ombudsman.
To je bila najveÏja odškodnina, ki je kadar koli izhajala iz pritožbe varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic.
It followed his finding that the Commission had failed to respect the complainant's reasonable expectations.
Sledila je njegovim ugotovitvam, da Komis` a ni upoštevala pritožnikovih upraviÏenih priÏakovanj.
The Commission had cancelled its financial contribution to the complainant's project. (2111/2002/MF)
Komis` a je ukinila svoj fi na n Ï ni prispevek za pritožnikov projekt. (2111/2002/MF)
The Commission abolished the age limit of 30 years as one of the selection criteria in its inservice traineeship programme.
• Komis` a je v svojem programu usposabljanja ob delu ukinila starostno mejo 30 let kot enega od izbirnih meril.
This followed a complaint concerning the rules governing the programme.
To je sledilo pritožbi v zvezi s pravili, ki urejajo ta program.
The Ombudsman noted that several other Community institutions and bodies apply an age limit in their traineeship programmes.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je opozoril, da nekaj drugih instituc`in organov Skupnosti v svojih programih usposabljanja uporablja starostno mejo.
He therefore announced that he would launch an own-initiative inquiry into these programmes. (2107/2002/(BB)PB)
Zato je najavil, da bo sprožil preiskavo teh programov na lastno pobudo. (2107/2002/(BB)PB)
The Commission agreed to give public access to a lemer that the Portuguese Minister of Finance had sent it concerning the Portuguese excessive deficit procedure.
• Komis` a se je strinjala, da bo omogoÏila javni dostop do pisma, ki ji ga je poslal portugalski minister za finance glede postopka v zvezi s Ïezmernim primanjkljajem na Portugalskem.
The Commission had refused a Member of the European Parliament access to the lemer on the grounds that its disclosure would undermine the protection of the public interest as regards the financial, monetary or economic policy of Portugal.
Komis` a je Ïlanu Evropskega parlamenta zavrnila dostop do pisma, ker je menila, da bi njegovo razkritje spodkopalo zašÏito javnega interesa v zvezi s fi na n Ï n o , monetarno in ekonomsko politiko Portugalske.
The Ombudsman approached the Portuguese authorities who informed him that, in the country's current budgetary situation, the lemer did not contain elements which could aT ect Portugal's economic and financial policy. (116/2005/MHZ)
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je navezal stik s portugalskimi organi in ti so ga obvestili, da glede na trenutno proraÏunsko situac` o v državi pismo ne vsebuje elementov, ki bi lahko vplivali na portugalsko ekonomsko in fi na n Ï n o politiko. (116/2005/MHZ)
If a Community institution or body fails to respond satisfactorily to a draW recommendation, the Ombudsman may send a special report to the European Parliament.
Je instituc` a ali organ Skupnosti na osnutek priporoÏila ne ponudi zadovoljivega odgovora, lahko varuh Ïlovekovih pravic pošlje posebno poroÏilo Evropskemu parlamentu.
This constitutes the Ombudsman's ultimate weapon and is the last substantive step he takes in dealing with a case, since the adoption of a resolution and the exercise of Parliament's powers are mamers for the political judgment of the Parliament.
To predstavlja zadnje orožje varuha Ïlovekovih pravic in dejansko zadnji možni ukrep v Ïasu obravnave primera, ker sta sprejetje resoluc`e in izvajanje pooblastil Parlamenta stvar politiÏne sodbe slednjega.
Three special reports were made in 2005:
Leta 2005 so bila pripravljena 3 posebna poroÏila:
The Ombudsman submimed a special report to Parliament a W er the Council failed to give valid reasons for refusing to meet in public whenever it is acting in its legislative capacity.
Novinar je potem varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic predložil nadaljnjo pritožbo, v kateri je trdil, da so informac`e, ki jih je OLAF zagotovil v okviru te preiskave, skušale „zavesti Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic in vplivati na preiskavo“.
The Ombudsman recommended that
V svojem odgovoru je Komis` a sicer izrazila pripravljenost pregledati trenutno politiko, ki je odvisna tudi od proraÏunskih omejitev, s katerimi bi se lahko
The inquiry concerned allegations of bribery, made by OLAF, that were likely to be understood as directed against a particular journalist.
POVZETEK spopadli v proraÏunskem postopku, vendar pa varuh Ïlovekovih pravic meni, da nedvoumen sprejem osnutka priporoÏila ni bil dosežen.
(1391/2002/JMA and others)
(1391/2002/JMA in drugi)
The Ombudsman makes use of his power of own initiative in two main instances.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic se k možnosti sprožitve preiskave na lastno pobudo naÏeloma zateÏe v dveh glavnih primerih.
Firstly, he may use it to investigate a possible case of maladministration when a complaint has been submimed by a non-authorised person (i.e., when the complainant is not a citizen or resident of the Union or a legal person with a registered oU ce in a Member State).
PrviÏ za preiskavo možnega primera nepravilnosti, Ïe je pritožbo vložila nepooblašÏena oseba (tj. pritožnik, ki ni državljan ali prebivalec Un`e ali pravna oseba z registriranim sedežem v državi Ïlanici).
Three such own-initiative inquiries were opened in 2005.
Leta 2005 so bile sprožene tri takšne preiskave na lastno pobudo.
The Ombudsman may also use his own-initiative power to tackle what appears to be a systemic problem in the institutions.
DrugiÏ se varuh Ïlovekovih pravic k lastni pobudi zateÏe za reševanje sistemskih težav v instituc`ah.
He did this on two occasions in 2005, including in the following instance:
V letu 2005 sta bili pozitivno zakljuÏeni dve takšni preiskavi na lastno pobudo, vkljuÏno v naslednjem primeru:
The Ombudsman launched an own-initiative inquiry into the issue of granting candidates access to the evaluation criteria established by selection boards.
• Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je sprožil preiskavo na lastno pobudo v zvezi z odobritv`o dostopa kandidatom do meril vrednotenja, ki so jih doloÏile izbirne komis` e.
This followed three cases he dealt with in 2005 concerning the information available to candidates in recruitment competitions.
To je sledilo trem primerom, s katerimi se je ukvarjal leta 2005 v zvezi z informac`ami, ki so bile kandidatom na voljo pri razpisih za zaposlitev.
EPSO's responses in these cases gave detailed additional information that would help the complainants concerned to understand their marks.
EPSO je v odgovoru na te primere podal dodatne podrobne informac`e, ki bi zadevnim pritožnikom pomagale pri razumevanju njihovih ocen.
As the cases raised important factual and legal issues of a more general nature, the Ombudsman decided to open an own-initiative inquiry. (OI/5/2005/PB)
Ker so primeri sprožili pomembna dejanska in pravna vprašanja bolj splošne narave, se je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic odloÏil za preiskavo na lastno pobudo. (OI/5/2005/PB)
Further analysis
Dodatna analiza
These and other cases are reviewed from the following thematic perspectives in the final section of chapter 2 of the Annual Report: openness and data protection; the Commission as “guardian of the Treaty”; tenders, contracts and grants; and personnel mamers, including recruitment.
V sklepnem razdelku poglavja 2 letnega poroÏila so ti in ostali primeri še dodatno preuÏeni z vidika naslednjih tematskih vprašanj: dostop do dokumentov in varstvo podatkov; Komis` a kot „varuh Pogodbe“; razpisi, pogodbe in dotac` e in kadrovska vprašanja, vkljuÏno z zaposlovanjem.
Chapter 3 of the Report contains summaries of 65 out of the total of 312 decisions closing cases in 2005.
Poglavje 3 poroÏila vsebuje povzetke 65 od skupno 312 odloÏb, s katerimi so bili zakljuÏeni primeri iz leta 2005.
The summaries reflect the range of subjects and institutions covered by the Ombudsman’s inquiries and the d iT erent types of finding. finding.
Povzetki odražajo razliÏna podroÏja in instituc`e, ki so bili zajeti v preiskave varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, ter vrste ugotovitev.
Decisions closing cases are normally published on the Ombudsman’s website (hmp://www.ombudsman.europa.eu) in English and in the language of the complainant, if d iT erent.
Vse odloÏbe, ki jih varuh sprejme po konÏani preiskavi, so obiÏajno objavljene na spletni strani varuha Ïlovekovih pravic (hmp://www.ombudsman.europa.eu) v anglešÏini in jeziku pritožnika.
Constructive working relations with EU institutions and bodies are essential for the Ombudsman to achieve positive results for citizens.
Konstruktivni delovni odnosi z instituc`ami in organi EU so za varuha Ïlovekovih pravic bistvenega pomena, saj je to sredstvo za doseganje pozitivnih rezultatov za državljane.
This cooperation takes the form of regular meetings and joint events, during which the Ombudsman and his interlocutors gain a greater understanding of each other’s work, explore how best to defend and promote citizens’ rights and identify areas in which they can work together in the future.
Sodelovanje poteka v obliki rednih sreÏanj in skupnih dogodkov, ki prispevajo k veÏjemu razumevanju dela enih in drugih in obema stranema omogoÏajo, da razišÏeta, kako najbolje zašÏititi in spodbuditi pravice državljanov, hkrati pa doloÏita podroÏja nadaljnjega sodelovanja.
The Ombudsman used the occasion of the tenth anniversary of the institution to build on the constructive relations that were developed during the first decade.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je deseto obletnico instituc` e izkoristil kot priložnost za nadgradnjo konstruktivnih odnosov, ki so bili zgrajeno v prvih desetih letih. Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je 17. novembra 2005 priredil uradno veÏerjo za predsednike in generalne sekretarje instituc` EU, skupaj z vodji organov in agenc` Un`e.
Over 45 people am ended the dinner, representing EU institutions, bodies and agencies from all over the Union.
VeÏerje se je udeležilo veÏ kot 45 ljudi, ki predstavljajo instituc`e, organe in agenc` e EU po vsej Un`i.
The aim of the event was to highlight the Ombudsman’s determination jointly to work with all EU institutions, bodies and agencies in the coming years to improve the quality of the EU administration.
Cilj dogodka je bil poudariti odloÏenost varuha Ïlovekovih pravic za skupno sodelovanje z vsemi instituc`ami, organi in agenc`ami EU v prihodnjih letih, da se tako izboljša kakovost upravljanja EU.
In light of the fact that the Commission accounts for around 70% of the inquiries carried out by the Ombudsman, the Commission President, Mr José Manuel BARROSO, was invited to deliver the keynote address.
Ker okoli 70 % preiskav, ki jih izvede varuh Ïlovekovih pravic, zadeva Komis`o, je bil g. José Manuel BARROSO povabljen, da nagovori udeležence.
During his address, the Commission President outlined the benefits of the new internal procedure adopted by the Commission for responding to the Ombudsman’s inquiries.
Med svojim nagovorom je predsednik Komis` e poudaril koristi novega internega postopka, ki ga je Komis` a sprejela kot odgovor na preiskave varuha Ïlovekovih pravic.
The Ombudsman used the occasion to outline his role not only as an external mechanism of control but also as a valuable resource to managers — a resource capable of helping administrations to bemer their performance by directing amention to areas for improvement.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic je izkoristil priložnost in poudaril svojo vlogo ne le kot zunanji mehanizem nadzora, ampak tudi dragocen vir za vodstvene kadre – vir, ki lahko upravi pomaga izboljšati delovanje z usmerjanjem pozornosti na podroÏja, na katerih so izboljšave potrebne.
These events included presentations of his work, during which he oTered guidance on how best to respond to complaints and how to improve procedures.
Med drugim so bile pripravljene predstavitve dela varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, na katerih je spregovoril o osnovnih naÏinih, kako najbolje odgovoriti na pritožbe in kako izboljšati postopke.
Of particular salience in this regard was the meeting with the College of Commissioners on 25 May.
V tej zvezi je bilo zlasti pomembno sreÏanje koleg` a komisarjev, ki je
In addition, during the meetings that took place in 2005, initiatives were explored with a view to enhancing interinstitutional cooperation and to exchanging information and best practice with key interlocutors.
LETNO POROČILO 2005
Further meetings saw discussion of the Ombudsman’s priorities and the resources necessary to achieve these priorities, with a particular focus on the institution’s budget for 2006.
Na sreÏanjih je še potekala razprava o prednostnih nalogah varuha Ïlovekovih pravic in sredstvih, potrebnih za njihovo dosego, pri Ïemer je bila posebna pozornost namenjena proraÏunu instituc` e.
The Ombudsman reports annually to the European Parliament and keeps Members regularly informed of his activities by providing them with copies of his publications throughout the year.
Evropski varuh Ïlovekovih pravic vsako leto poroÏa Evropskemu parlamentu, redno pa o svojih dejavnostih obvešÏa tudi poslance, katerim skozi vse leto pošilja publikac` e o svojem delu.
Nine publications were made available to MEPs in 2005.
Leta 2005 so poslanci Evropskega parlamenta prejeli devet tovrstnih publikac` .
There is a fruitful working relationship between the Ombudsman and Parliament’s Commimee on Petitions, including mutual transfer of cases when appropriate, so as to oTer the most eTective service possible to European citizens.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic uspešno sodeluje z Odborom za petic`e Evropskega parlamenta, s katerim si po potrebi vzajemno izmenjuje primere, kar dopolnjuje uÏinkovito delovanje v prid evropskim državljanom.
The Ombudsman also advises complainants who are seeking a change in European law or policy of the possibility to address a petition to the Parliament.
Varuh Ïlovekovih pravic pritožnikom, ki si prizadevajo za spremembe evropske zakonodaje ali politike, svetuje, kako naj petic`o naslov`o na Parlament.
Relations between the Ombudsman and the Commimee on Petitions went from strength to strength in 2005, with the MAVROMMATIS Report on the Ombudsman’s activities for 2004 highlighting the importance of these constructive working relations.
Odnosi med varuhom Ïlovekovih pravic in odborom za petic`e so se leta 2005 krepili, kjer je poroÏilo MAVROMMATISAo dejavnostih varuha Ïlovekovih pravic leta 2004 poudarilo pomembnost teh konstruktivnih delovnih odnosov.
At a meeting of the Commimee on Petitions on 12 October 2005, the Ombudsman, in accordance with Rule 195(3) of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, undertook to appear before the Commimee at his own request, whenever he presents a special report to Parliament.
Na zasedanju odbora za petic`e 12. oktobra 2005 se je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic v skladu s pravilom 195(3) poslovnika Parlamenta zavzel za to, da se mu na lastno zahtevo omogoÏi nastop pred odborom, kadar koli bo Parlamentu predstavljal posebno poroÏilo.
The European Ombudsman co-operates closely with his counterparts at the national, regional and local levels to make sure that citizens’ complaints about EU law are dealt with promptly and eTectively.
Tesno sodelovanje s kolegi na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni je kljuÏna naloga Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, saj predstavlja zagotovilo za takojšnjo in uÏinkovito obravnavo pritožb državljanov.
This cooperation is equally vital for tracking important developments in the world of ombudsmen, exchanging information about EU law and sharing best practice.
Za sledenje pomembnim spremembam na podroÏju delovanja varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic je prav tako odloÏilnega pomena izmenjava informac` o zakonodaji EU in najboljši praksi.
For the most part, this cooperation takes place under the aegis of the European Network of Ombudsmen, although the European Ombudsman equally participates in conferences, seminars and meetings outside of the Network.
V veÏini primerov to sodelovanje poteka v okviru Evropske mreže varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic, Ïeprav Evropski varuh Ïlovekovih pravic prav tako sodeluje na konferencah, seminarjih in sreÏanjih zunaj mreže.
The European Network of Ombudsmen
Evropska mreža varuhov Ïlovekovih pravic
The Network now comprises almost 90 oUces in 30 countries, covering the national and regional levels within the Union, as well as the national level in the applicant countries for EU membership, Norway and Iceland.
Mreža zdaj vkljuÏuje skoraj 90 podružnic v 30 državah ter pokriva nacionalne in regionalne ravni v Un`i ter nacionalno raven v državah prosilkah za Ïlanstvo v EU, na Norveškem in Island`i.
There is an eTective mechanism for cooperation on case handling.
Vzpostavljen je uÏinkovit mehanizem za sodelovanje pri obravnavi primerov.
This is particularly important given that many complainants turn to the European Ombudsman when they have problems with a national, regional or local administration.
To je še posebej pomembno glede na to, da se veliko pritožnikov obrne na Evropskega varuha Ïlovekovih pravic, Ïeprav imajo težave z nacionalno, regionalno ali lokalno upravo.
In many cases, an ombudsman in the country concerned can provide an eTective remedy.
V številnih primerih lahko za uÏinkovita pravna sredstva poskrbi varuh Ïlovekovih pravic v zadevni državi.
When possible, the European Ombudsman transfers cases directly to national and regional ombudsmen or gives suitable advice to the complainant.
Je je mogoÏe, evropski varuh primer prenese neposredno na nacionalnega ali regionalnega ombudsmana, sicer pa pritožniku primerno svetuje.
During 2005, the Ombudsman advised 945 complainants to turn to a national or regional ombudsman and transferred 91 complaints directly to the competent ombudsman.
Leta 2005 je varuh Ïlovekovih pravic v 945 primerih pritožnikom svetoval, naj se obrnejo na nacionalnega ali regionalnega ombudsmana, 91 pritožb pa je neposredno prenesel zadevnemu varuhu Ïlovekovih pravic.
The ombudsmen in the Network are also well placed to help inform citizens about their rights under EU law and about how to exercise and defend those rights.
Varuhi Ïlovekovih pravic v mreži prav tako lahko pomagajo pri obvešÏanju državljanov o pravicah, ki jih imajo na temelju zakonodaje EU, kot tudi o tem, kako jih uveljaviti oziroma braniti.
In addition to the regular informal exchanges of information through the Network, a special procedure exists through which national or regional ombudsmen may ask for wrimen answers to queries about EU law and its interpretation, including queries that arise in their handling of specific cases.
Poleg redne neformalne izmenjave informac` prek mreže obstaja tudi posebni postopek, s katerim lahko nacionalni ali regionalni varuhi Ïlovekovih pravic pros`o za pisne odgovore na vprašanja o zakonodaji EU in njenem tolmaÏenju, vkljuÏno z vprašanji, ki nastanejo pri njihovi obravnavi posebnih primerov.