natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The output `Studies, reports and books' also signi«-cantly contributes to all the objectives.
K vsem ciljem pomembno prispeva tudi rezultat ¶þtudije, poroｲila in knjigeƒ.
It is also interesting to note that `Training packages and manuals' has an in‹uenceonthreeobjectives, con«rmingtheneedtokeeptraininghighontheagenda.
Zanimivo je tudi, da ¶kompleti in priroｲniki za usposabljanjeƒ vplivajo na tri cilje, kar potrjuje potrebo po tem, da ostane usposabljanje visoko na prednostni lestvici nalog.
Moreover, there is no signi«cantdi.erenceinthequalityoftheoutputsfromoneobjectiveto the other.
Þe veｲ, v kakovosti rezultatov od enega cilja do drugega ni pomembnih razlik.
In addition, each programme objective is also supported by impacts.
Poleg tega vsak cilj programa podpirajo tudi vplivi.
The main impacts support one or more programme objectives and all programme objectives are supported by impacts.
Glavni vplivi podpirajo enega ali veｲ ciljev programa, vplivi pa podpirajo vse cilje programa.
The analysis produced a number of recommendations for sustaining that e.ectiveness:
Z analizo se je izoblikovalo veｲ priporoｲil za ohranjanje te uｲinkovitosti:
‡ encourage tangible outputs, such as videos or training modules, that are easy to replicate or to adapt in other areas or with other professionals working with end-bene«ciaries;
‡ vzpodbujati otipljive rezultate, kot so videi ali moduli usposabljanja, ki jih ni te™ko replici-rati ali prilagoditi v drugih obmoｲjih oziroma z drugimi strokovnjaki, ki delajo s konｲnimi prejemniki;
‡ increase dissemination activities so that project results get more visibility with decision-makers;
‡ krepiti dejavnosti þirjenja projektov z namenom, da dobijo rezultati projektov veｲjo opaz-nost pred nosilci odloｲanja;
‡ increasingly involve target groups, end-bene«ciariesandkeystakeholdersasearlyasthedesign stage of the project.
‡ vse veｲje vkljuｲevanje ciljnih skupin, konｲnih prejemnikov in kljuｲnih zainteresiranih strani v najbolj zgodnjih fazah projektov.
The programme e/ciencymeasurestherelationbetweeninputsononehandandoutputsand impacts on the other hand, with a view to assessing the value for money.
Uspeþnost programa meri povezavo med vlo™ki na eni strani in rezultati na drugi, z namenom oceniti dobljeno vrednost za vlo™eni denar.
A programme like Daphne is, however, not a production unit, the costs and bene«tsofwhichcan be precisely estimated in monetary terms.
Vendar pa program, kakrþen je Daphne, ni proizvodna enota, katere stroþke in koristi je mo-goｲe natanｲno oceniti z vrednostjo denarja.
Although most of the inputs are known ̌ in terms of funds ̌ it is meaningless to put a monetary value on the outputs or impacts: for example, the value of enabling children and women to protect themselves better and prevent violence cannot be expressed in commercial terms.
Peprav je veｲina rezultatov znanih › v smislu denarnih sredstev › je nesmiselno ocenjevati rezultate ali vplive z denarno vrednostjo: omo-goｲanja otrokom in ™enskam, da se lahko uspeþneje obvarujejo nasilja in ga prepreｲijo, ni mogoｲe izraziti v tr™ni vrednosti.
We can, however, gain indications of the usefulness of the programme, its outputs and impacts.
Seveda pa lahko pridobimo kazalce o uporabnosti programa, njegovih rezultatov in vplivov.
Another theoretically feasible approach to assessing e/ciencywouldbetobenchmarktheinputs and outputs/impacts of Daphne in relation to a programme with comparable outputs and impacts.
Drug teoretiｲno smiseln pristop k ocenjevanju uspeþnosti bi bil merjenje vlo™kov in rezulta-tov/vplivov programa Daphne s primerljivimi rezultati in vplivi drugega programa.
However, to our knowledge and according to the stakeholders interviewed, Daphne is unique, and no comparable programme exists, although there are national initia-tives that cover some of the Daphne areas.
Toda Daph-ne je, kolikor nam je znano in vemo iz pogovorov z zainteresiranimi, edinstven program, pri-merjalnega programa ni, ｲeprav obstajajo nacionalne pobude, ki pokrivajo nekatera podroｲja programa Daphne.
We have assessed e/ciencybyfollowinga p r a g m a t i c a p p r o a c h , m a k i n g t h e b e s tffu s e o f t h e d i . e r e n t k i n d s o f i nfo r m a t i o n a v a i l a b l e a n d f o c u s i n g o n t h e uijt i l i tffy o f t h e p r o g r a m mffe .
Uｲinkovitost smo ocenjevali z upoþtevanjem pragmatiｲne obravnave, pri ｲemer smo ｲim bo-lje uporabili razliｲne informacije, ki so na voljo in se osredotoｲili na uporabnost programa.
T h e r e p r e s e n t a t i v e sample of 148 completed projects analysed can be characterised by the fol-lowing basic facts and «gures.
Lahko reｲemo, da so za analizirani reprezentativni vzorec 148 dokonｲanih projektov znaｲilna naslednja osnovna dejstva in podatki:
‡ The sample represents a total budget of nearly EUR 20 million (up to 2001), i.e. about EUR 133 000 per project and EUR 23 500 per participant.
‡ Vzorec predstavlja skupni proraｲun skoraj 20 milijonov evrov (do leta 2001), torej pribli™no 133 000 evrov na projekt in 23 500 evrov na udele™enca.
‡ The EU funding represents some 75 % of these budgets, i.e. some EUR 17 600 per partici-pant.
‡ Financiranje EU predstavlja pribli™no 75 % teh proraｲunskih sredstev, torej 17 600 evrov na udele™enca.
On average this means the EU is funding two full-time equivalents (FTE) for each project for one year or 0.35 FTE per participating organisation.
V povpreｲju to pomeni, da EU za eno leto « n a n c i r a d v e e n o t i F T E v t r a j a nj u p o l n e zaposlitve (FTE › full-time equivalent) za vsak projekt oziroma 0,35 FTE na organiza-cijo udele™enko.
This also means that, on average, Daphne supports 0.8 % of the personnel of the participating organisations (13) for one year.
To obenem pomeni, da program Daphne v povpreｲju podpira 0,8 % oseb-ja organizacij udele™enk13 za eno leto.
‡ For two thirds of the projects, the remaining 25 % of the budget is covered by internal funds only.
‡ Za dve tretjini projektov se krije preostalih 25 % proraｲuna samo iz notranjih sredstev.
Ten per cent of the projects only have access to external funding and one project out of four declares a mix of internal and external funds. In particular, these «guresre‹ectthedi/cultaccesstoexternalfunding,eitherbecausethisfundingisscarceorbecausesecur-ing it is not easy.
Samo deset odstotkov projektov ima dostop do zunanjega «nanciranjainenprojektodþtirihje«nanciranmeþano,zzunanjimiinnotranjimisredstvi.Teþtevilkezlastika™ejonate™avnostdostopa do zunanjega «nanciranja,bodisizato,kerjedenarjamalo,alizato,kerganipre-prosto zagotoviti.
The funding is often complemented by extra work from the participating NGOs as well as by volunteers.
Financiranje pogosto dopolnjuje dodatno delo nevladnih organizacij udele™enk in prostovoljcev.
The volume of this e.ortisobviouslydi/cultto evaluate.
Obseg teh prizadevanj je seveda te™ko vrednotiti.
) Assuming an average of 42 full-time equivalents in the participating organisations employing less than 1 000 persons.
S predpostavko 42 ekvivalentov polne zaposlitve v organizacijah u d e l e Š e n k a h z manj kot 1 000 zaposlenimi.
‡ On average, each project generated «veoutputsthatcontributedsigni«cantlytoachievingthe six main programme objectives.
‡ V povpreｲju je imel vsak projekt 5 rezultatov, ki so bistveno prispevali k doseganju þestih glavnih ciljev programa.
A very impressive volume of material was dissemi-nated by 98 % of the projects and events were organised by 90 % of them: e.g. 27 projects disseminated 228 000 posters and 297 000 brochures; various events were organised, at-
Presenetljivo velik obseg gradiva so razdelili v 98 % projektov, prireditve pa je organiziralo 90 % projektov: 27 projektov je npr. razdelilo 228 000 plakatov in 297 000 broþur; pripravili so razliｲne prireditve, ki se jih je skupaj udele™ilo 40 000 ljudi.
The results of the Daphne experience tended by a total of 40 000 people.
Rezultati izkuþenj, pridobljenih v programu Daphne
‡ The 148 projects analysed involved 1 227 organisations.
‡ 148 analiziranih projektov je vkljuｲevalo 1 227 organizacij.
Participation in the project had an impact on 97 % of them, mainly in terms of improved expertise, improved networking ca-pacities or adoption of good practice.
Sodelovanje v projektu je vpli-valo kar na 97 % organizacij, v glavnem zaradi izboljþanega strokovnega znanja, izboljþanih zmo™nosti mre™enja ali posvojitve dobrih praks.
Participation in Daphne has therefore had a de«niteand positive e.ectontheseorganisations.
Sodelovanje v programu Daphne je zato imelo otipljiv in pozitiven vpliv na te organizacije.
These achievements therefore represent substantial value, particularly in view of the limited funding provided by the Commission.
Ti dose™ki zato predstavljajo bistveno vrednost, zlasti z vidika omejenosti sredstev, zagotov-ljenih v Komisiji.
The evaluation did check whether there was any sig-ni«cantrelationshipbetweenthebudgetsize,ontheonehand,andthenatureandfrequen-cy of outputs and impacts on the other, and came to the conclusion that there was none.
Vrednotenje je preverjalo, ali obstaja med velikostjo proraｲuna na eni strani in naravo ter frekvenco rezultatov ter vplivom na drugi strani pomembna povezava, in ugo-tovljeno je bilo, da te povezave ni.
This is, at least partly, due to the fact that most participants in Daphne consider the budget as a tool.
Vzrok za to je vsaj deloma v tem, da veｲina udele™encev v programu Daphne jemlje proraｲun kot pripomoｲek.
They invest voluntary e.ortandattributehighvaluetotheprojectresults.
V projekte vlagajo prostovoljna priza-devanja, s katerimi prispevajo k dose™kom projektov resniｲno visoko vrednost.
Value for money is also evidenced by the following elements:
Stroþkovna uｲinkovitost je razvidna tudi iz teh elementov:
‡ achievement of a high-level objective: generation of common de«nitionsoracommonapproach to a violence-related issue;
‡ Doseganje cilja na visoki ravni: Oblikovanje skupnih de«nicijaliskupnegapristopadovpraþanj, ki so povezana z nasiljem.
‡ quality of the outputs: some outputs are still demanded after the project's end or can be easily replicated;
‡ Kakovost rezultatov: Ko je projekt konｲan, þe obstaja povpraþevanje po nekaterih rezultatih oziroma so ti brez te™av ponovljeni.
‡ project sustainability: the project still exists after the end of the contract, or it laid the foun-dations for follow-up projects.
‡ Trajnost projektov: Projekt obstaja tudi po izteku pogodbe oziroma je polo™il temelje za projekte, ki bodo sledili.
Another con«rmationofthevalueformoneycomesfromthe ex-post evaluations, carried out by independent experts on behalf of Daphne, project by project.
Þe ena potrditev stroþkovne uｲinkovitosti prihaja iz naknadnih vrednotenj neodvisnih stro-kovnjakov, ki jih ti opravijo za Daphne, projekt za projektom.
Out of 76 projects evaluated in this way between 1998 and 2000, 79 % were assessed as providing good or excellent value for money.
Od 76 projektov, ki so bili v letih od 1998 do 2000 vrednoteni na ta naｲin, jih je bilo 79 % ovrednotenih z dobro ali odliｲno oceno stroþkovne uｲinkovitosti.
Last but not least, most stakeholders interviewed ̌ who are not past or present project co-ordinators ̌ consider that Daphne has a dual utility:
Zadnje, vendar ne najmanj pomembno, je, da veｲina vpraþanih zainteresiranih › ki niso bili oziroma niso koordinatorji projektov › meni, da ima program Daphne dvojno uporabnost:
‡ it is unique in addressing the issues of violence against women, young people and children in an integrated way (i.e. considering all the dimensions of violence) and on a European scale;
‡ edinstven je v obravnavanju nasilja nad ™enskami, mladino in otroki na integriran naｲin (torej tako, da upoþteva vse razse™nosti nasilja) in na evropski ravni;
‡ it brings about positive changes in the way violence is perceived and addressed in terms of prevention and protection.
‡ prinaþa pozitivne spremembe v naｲinu zaznavanja in obravnavanja nasilja z vidika prepre-ｲevanja in zaþｲite.
From the evidence above, we can state that the programme is e / c i e n t , i . e . w i t h l i m i t e d E U s up po r t , signi«cantachievementsandimpactswererealised.Thisassessmentcanbetem-pered by two considerations:
Glede na navedeno lahko ugotovimo, da je program uｲinkovit, ali povedano drugaｲe, da je kljub omejeni podpori EU uspel uresniｲiti pomembne rezultate in vplive. To oceno lahko ubla-™imo z dvema pomislekoma:
‡ there have been additional inputs in the form of contributions in kind and the work of vol-unteers that have not been systematically calculated.
‡ Projekti so imeli dodatne vlo™ke v obliki prispevkov v naravi in dela prostovoljcev, kar ni bilo sistematiｲno obraｲunano.
These inputs have also contributed to outputs and impacts, but are not necessarily sustainable;
Ti vlo™ki so prav tako prispevali k rezultatom in vplivom, niso pa nujno trajni.
‡ among the partners from the social sector, only a small number have sound expertise in resource management, de«nitionofworkplans,etc.,thatfacilitatesoptimaluseofthelimited resources available and prevents exhaustion setting in.
‡ Med partnerji iz dru™benega sektorja jih ima le malo dobro strokovno znanje in dobro upravljanje virov, de«nicijedelovnihnaｲrtovitd.,karolajþaoptimalnoraboomejenihsred-stev, ki so na voljo, in prepreｲuje izｲrpavanje.
Information materials, including newsletters
Gradiva za informiranje, tudi okro™nice
Studies, reports and books
Þtudije, poroｲila in knjige
Direct action/«eld interventions, helplines
Akcije/posredovanja, telefonske linije
Websites, CDs and CD-ROMs
Spletna mesta, ploþｲe CD
Videos, TV/radio spots and other audiovisual products
Videi, TV/radijski oglasi in drugi avdiovizualni izdelki
Presented di.erently,thepercentageofprojectshavinggeneratedoutputsareasfollows:
Odstotki projektov, ki so dali rezultate, so, ｲe jih prika™emo drugaｲe, taki:
Studies, reports and books
Gradiva za informiranje, tudi okro™nice
Guidelines, training packages, manuals
Þtudije, poroｲila in knjige
Websites, CDs and CD-ROMs
Neposredne akcije/posredovanje, telefonske linije
Videos, TV/radio spots and other audiovisual products
Videi, TV/radijski oglasi in drugi avdiovizu-alni izdelki
Conferences, seminars, workshops
Konference, seminarji, delavnice
Distribution of projects according to the outputs achieved (148 projects, up to three choices per project)
Obseg, v katerem vplivajo na spreminjanje menta-litete in obnaþanja, ni natanｲno znan.
) MEANS Collection ̋ Evaluation of socioeconomic programmes, European Commission, Regional Policy DG, 1999.
Zbirka MEANS ‡Evaluating socio-economic programmesƒ (Vrednotenje socialno-ekonomskih programov), Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za regionalno politiko, 1999.
The above two points, con«rmedbytheopinionofsomestakeholders,tendtoshowthatinformation campaigns are useful for actually preventing violence.
Zgornji dve toｲki, kar potrjujejo tudi mnenja nekaterih zainteresiranih, ka™eta, da so kampanje informiranja koristne za dejansko prepreｲevanje nasilja.
However, in order to im-prove the situation of the e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h e m s e l v e s , d i r e c t a d v o c a c y w i t h a n d s up po r t t offe n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s a r e m o r e i m po r t a n t t h a n g e n e r a l i nfo r m a t i o n a n d a w a r e n e s s - r a i s i n g .
Da bi izboljþali osebni polo™aj konｲnih prejemnikov, pa sta neposredno zagovorniþtvo in podpora konｲnim prejemnikom pomemb-nejþa od sploþnega informiranja in ozaveþｲanja javnosti.
Of the completed projects, 97 % implemented dissemination activities along the following categories:
97 % dokonｲanih projektov je izvajalo dejavnosti razþirjanja v naslednjih kategorijah
Considering their actual dissemination, a large majority of projects performed better than planned: most of the projects had equal or better performance regarding dissemination ex-penditures (89 % of projects), timing of dissemination (80 %), audience (96 %) and dissemina-tion activities (98 %).
Pe upoþtevamo njihovo dejansko razþirjanje, je bila velika veｲina projektov izvajana bolje, kot je bilo naｲrtovano: veｲina projektov je imela enako ali viþjo uspeþnost glede na izdatke za razþirjanje dose™kov (89 % projektov), ｲasovno usklajenost razþirjanja (80 %), dose™eno javnost (96 %) in dejavnosti razþirjanja (98 %).
The latter produced the following materials:
Slednji so izdelali navedena gradiva:
D a t a b a s e s
Podatkovne zbirke
Distribution of projects according to their production of materials for dissemination (144 projects)
Porazdelitev projektov glede na izdelavo gradiv za razþirjanje (144 projektov)
Considering that most of the projects had a duration of one year, we can evidently state that partners have produced a lot of material over a short period, as indicated below:
Ob upoþtevanju, da je veｲina projektov trajala eno leto, lahko oｲitno ugotovimo, da so part-nerji v kratkem ｲasu pripravili veliko gradiv, kot je razvidno spodaj:
227 966 posters by 27 projects 13 556 newsletters by 9 projects 297 160 brochures by 27 projects 77 272 reports by 46 projects 64 600 manuals by 7 projects 27 700 books by 19 projects 370 t-shirts by 2 projects 731 456 lea‹etsby36projects 21 553 articles by 14 projects 2 000 directories by 2 projects 1 770 videos by 5 projects 5 000 stickers by 2 projects 6 000 postcards by 4 projects 16 152 CD-ROMs by 12 projects 2 000 business cards by 2 projects 2 000 colour cartoons by 1 project 500 protocols by 1 project 200 pins by 1 project.
› 227 966 plakatov v 27 projektih › 13 556 okro™nic v 9 projektih › 297 160 broþur v 27 projektih › 77 272 poroｲil v 46 projektih › 64 600 priroｲnikov v 7 projektih › 27 700 knjig v 19 projektih › 370 majic v 2 projektih › 731 456 letakov v 36 projektih › 21 553 ｲlankov v 14 projektih › 2 000 imenikov v 2 projektih › 1 770 videov v 5 projektih › 5 000 nalepk v 2 projektih › 6 000 razglednic v 4 projektih › 16 152 CD-ROM-ov v 12 projektih › 2 000 poslovnih vizitk v 2 projektih › 2 000 barvnih animacij v 1 projektu › 500 protokolov v 1 projektu › 200 priponk v 1 projektu.
From the survey, the following «gureshavebeenextractedonthenumbersofeventsorgan-ised and their attendees:
Iz pregleda so bile vzete naslednje þtevilke o þtevilu prireditev in udele™bi na njih:
71 meetings organised for 19 projects, totalling 880 attendees 51 participations in conferences, for 6 projects, totalling 3 620 attendees 94 conferences organised for 62 projects, totalling 16 793 attendees 389 seminars organised for 64 projects, totalling 11 334 attendees245 workshops organised for 36 projects, totalling 4 356 attendees 56 project presentations organised for 6 projects, totalling 3 160 attendees 2 press conferences organised for 1 project, totalling 40 attendees 70 implementation meetings organised for 1 project and involving 546 persons.
› 2 tiskovni konferenci za en projekt, skupaj 40 udele™encev › 70 izvedbenih sestankov za 1 projekt, ki se jih je udele™ilo 546 oseb.
Conferences, seminars and workshops are strong instruments for networking.
Konference, seminarji in delavnice so moｲan pripomoｲek za mre™enje.
Their added value for dissemination and generation of impact is, however, more questionable.
‡ Sredstva, potrebna za organiziranje teh dogodkov, so precejþnja, ｲe jih primerjamo z dru-gimi dejavnostmi razþirjanja, npr. s spletnim mestom.
‡ The resources required to organise such events are substantial, compared with other dis-semination activities such as dissemination through a website.‡ Dissemination mainly concerns the people attending.
Konference, seminarji in de-lavnice so koristni, ｲe dose™ejo posameznike ciljnih skupin in konｲne prejemnike, ki so zunaj naｲrtovanih, oziroma ｲe dose™ejo kljuｲne osebe v politiki in zato bolje umeþｲajo do-se™ke, da imajo ti veｲji vpliv.
Conferences, seminars and work-shops are useful on condition that they reach target group members and end-bene«ciariesbeyond those directly targeted by the project or that they reach key political people and thus better position the results to have a larger impact.‡ Most of the time, conferences are one-shot events: once they are «nished,thereisoftennofollow-up action with the aim of making things change.
‡ Konference so veｲinoma enkratni dogodki: ko so konｲane, jim ne sledijo akcije, usmerjene v spreminjanje stanja. Tako zakljuｲijo dejavnosti projekta, namesto da bi delovale kot ｲlen v razþirjanju in verigi vplivov.
They therefore conclude the project activities instead of being a link in the dissemination and impact chain.‡ They often take place at the end of the project, which is probably too late to have an impact.
‡ Pogosto se dogajajo na koncu projekta, kar je verjetno prepozno, da bi lahko imele kak vpliv.
In fact, having an impact on target groups, end-bene«ciariesandpublicauthoritiesimpliesengaging them earlier in the project.
Da bi dejansko lahko vplivale na ciljne skupine, konｲne prejemnike in javno oblast, bi morale potekati v zgodnejþih fazah projekta.
Nevertheless, conferences, seminars and workshops allow contact with a larger audience than through «eldactionsorspeci«ctraining.Toreinforcetheconferencesasinstrumentsforfur-ther dissemination and impacts, it is suggested to:
Ne glede na to konference, seminarji in delavnice omogoｲajo stik s þirþim obｲinstvom, kakor bi ga lahko z delovanjem na terenu ali s posebnim usposabljanjem. Da bi konference dodatno okrepili kot pripomoｲek za nadaljnje razþirjanje projektov in vplivov, predlagamo:
‡ make sure key decision-makers and policy-makers are invited and do attend;
‡ poskrbeti je treba, da bodo vabljeni nosilci odloｲanja in tisti, ki oblikujejo politiko, ter za-gotoviti njihovo udele™bo;
‡ carry out follow-up actions after the conference to keep the issue in the minds of the at-tendees.
‡ po konｲani konferenci je treba izvajati dodatne akcije, da bodo udele™enci ostali pozorni na obravnavano problematiko.
Some projects were successful in reaching key people through events, as illustrated below.
Nekateri projekti so bili uspeþni v doseganju kljuｲnih oseb s prireditvami, kot je prikazano spodaj:
An expert meeting was organised at month 11 of the project.
Sreｲanje strokovnjakov je bilo organizirano v 11. mesecu projekta.
It brought together 50 European FGM stakeholders.
Povezalo je 50 evropskih in-teresnih skupin na podroｲju boja proti pohabljanju ™enskih spolnih organov.
The project succeeded in bringing together relevant partners in the «eldacross Europe and establishing the «rstexpertnetworkinthisimportant«eld.Thechangesbrought about in European treatment of responses to FGM can largely be traced back from this initial project and the commonality across Europe of those responses to FGM is due almost en-tirely to this project and its subsequent chapters.
Projekt je uspeþno povezal ustrezne partnerje po vsej Evropi in vzpostavil prvo mre™o strokovnjakov na tem po-membnem podroｲju. Spremembe, nastale v evropskem obravnavanju odzivov na pohabljanje ™enskih spolnih organov, je v marsiｲem prinesel prav ta prvi projekt in podobnost teh odzivov je skoraj v celoti rezultat tega projekta in njegovih nadaljevanj.
[It fostered the] development of a di.erentiatedandintegratedtrainingsystemaddressingplay-ers in a multi-disciplinary approach: social intervention bodies both from the public and the non-pro«tsector,law-enforcementagenciesandthejudicialsystem,playersinthelabourmar-ket, local political representatives.
Razvijanje diferenciranega in integriranega sistema usposabljanja udele™encev z veｲ- disciplinarnim pristopom: organi dru™benega posredovanja iz javnega in nepro«tnegasektor-ja, organi pregona in pravosodni sistem, udele™enci na trgu delovne sile, domaｲi politiｲni pred-stavniki.
Such a di.erentiatedandintegratedtrainingsystemimprovedthe expertise of the di.erentplayersandde«nedgoodnetworkingstrategiesandpractices.
Tako diferenciran in integriran sistem usposabljanja je izboljþal strokovno znanje razliｲnih udele™encev in de«niraldobrestrategijeinpraksemre™enja.
Reaching target groups and end-bene«ciaries
Doseganje ciljnih skupin in konｲnih prejemnikov