natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A long-standing practice putting in place an ambitious ‘better regulation’strategy aimed at simplifying and updating the regulatory environment of the Community.
Evropskakomisija je že pred več leti začela izvajativelikopotezno strategijo za„boljšo pripravo zakonodaje“, se praviza poenostavitev in izboljšanje zakonodajnega okolja Skupnosti.
The initiative is based on different types of measures: per o u in E e
Ta pobuda temelji na več vrstah ukrepov: vE vr o
•systematic evaluation of the economic, social andenvironmental impact of the Commission's major proposals;
•sistematično ocenjevanje gospodarskega, družbenega in okoljskega vpliva pomembnih predlogov Komisije;
•implementation of a simplification programme for existinglegislation;
•izvajanje programa poenostavljanja veljavne zakonodaje; o in rib o g o js tv
•reduction of administrative burdens;
•zmanjšanje upravnih obremenitev; ib iš tv R
One of the first steps in this direction was the introduction of the Advisory Committee on Fisheries in the early 1970s.
Eden prvih ukrepov v tem smislu je bila ustanovitev Svetovalnegaodbora za ribištvo v začetku sedemdesetih let 20. stoletja.
It wasmodernised in 1999: new sectors and interest groups(aquaculture, non-governmental organisations, scientists) wereinvited to participate in the work of the committee, which hassince been renamed the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA).
Ta je bil reformiran leta 1999: k sodelovanju pri delu odbora, ki seod takrat imenuje Svetovalni odbor za ribištvo in ribogojstvo(ACFA), so bili povabljeni novi sektorji in interesne skupine(ribogojstvo, nevladne organizacije, znanstveni krogi).
The ACFA is composed of 21 membersrepresenting different interests, ranging from vessel owners andfishermen to fish farmers, shellfish farmers, processors and traders,and relevant non-governmental organisations.
ACFAsestavlja 21 članov, ki zastopajo različne interese od lastnikovplovil in ribičev do ribogojcev, gojiteljev školjk in predelovalcev terod trgovine z ribiškimi proizvodi do zainteresiranih nevladnihorganizacij.
The Commissionconsults the committee on measures related to the CFP and otherpolicies affecting the sector.
Komisija se posvetuje z njim o ukrepih v zvezi s SRP indrugimi politikami, ki zadevajo ta sektor.
The ACFA may also issue opinions onits own initiative.
Mnenje lahko izda tudina lastno pobudo.
These different types of measures are all put into practice in the context of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP); consultationof parties, which has been in place for a long time, is particularlywell developed.
•obsežno posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi predizvajanjem strategije ali pomembnega zakonodajnega akta.
Over the years, other consultation initiatives have also beenlaunched: regional workshops on conservation issues, publichearings on key areas of the CFP such as monitoring and fleetcapacity (in 2000), as well as an all-encompassing consultation on the CFP reform brought to successful conclusion in 2002,including a questionnaire sent to 350 fisheries organisations,regional meetings with stakeholders in the Member States and ahearing in which some 400 stakeholder representatives took part.These are just a few examples.
V tem času so bile sprejete druge pobude v zvezi sposvetovanjem: regionalne delavnice o vprašanjih ohranjanjavirov, javna zaslišanja o ključnih področjih SRP, kot sta nadzor inzmogljivost ladjevja (leta 2000), ter splošno posvetovanje oreformi SRP, sprejeti leta 2002, v okviru katerega je bil vprašalnikposlan 350 ribiškim organizacijam, regionalna srečanja zzainteresiranimi stranmi v državah članicah in zaslišanje, ki se ga jeudeležilo približno 400 predstavnikov iz zainteresiranih krogov. To je samo nekaj primerov.
Systematic consultations and consumer protection groups, women's organisations orrepresentatives of recreational fishermen.
Posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi je v zadnjih letih postalonekaj običajnega pri pripravi novih ukrepov v zvezi s SRP.
Their role is to submitopinions to the Commission and the Member States on differentaspects of fisheries management.
V zadnjihmesecih je bilo organiziranih več posvetovanj, na katerih je bilizražen interes sektorja in drugih akterjev za tovrstne ukrepe.
Their opinions are issued eitheron a specific request or on their own initiative.
območja bodisi določene vrste ribištva, za katere so značilniprimerljivi pogoji izkoriščanja.
The Councildecision establishing the RACs set up seven geographical orfisheries zones to be covered by these advisory bodies: North Sea,Baltic Sea, Mediterranean Sea, North-western waters (from the English Channel to Iceland), South-western waters (from the Bayof Biscay to the Canary Islands), pelagic stocks and high seasfisheries (beyond EU waters).
Sestavljajo jih strokovnjaki izribiškega sektorja v širšem pomenu in predstavniki različnihinteresnih skupin, ki jih zadevajo ribiške dejavnosti, kot so društva za varovanje okolja in združenja za zaščito potrošnikov,organizacije žensk in zastopniki športnega ribolova.
Six are operational at present. The Council decision also establishes a yearly financialcontribution from the EU budget.
Njihova vlogaje izdajati mnenja za Komisijo in tudi države članice o različnihvidikih upravljanja ribištva.
In the last few years, the consultation of interested parties hasbecome a systematic element of the preparation of new CFPmeasures.
V Sklepu Sveta o ustanovitvi regionalnihsvetovalnih svetov je opredeljenih sedem geografskih območij aliribištev, ki jih pokrivajo ti svetovalni sveti: Severno morje, Baltskomorje, Sredozemsko morje, severozahodne vode (od Rokavskegapreliva do Islandije), jugozahodne vode (od Biskajskega zaliva do Kanarskih otokov), pelagični stalež, ribolov na odprtem morjuzunaj voda Skupnosti.
Together with the ACFA, the RACs quickly became essentialpartners for the Commission, which keeps them informed andseeks their opinion when drafting proposals. The RACs have putout some 60 recommendations since their start-up in 2004.
Skupaj z ACFA so RAC hitro postali bistveni sogovorniki Komisije,ki jih obvešča in prosi za mnenje za pripravo svojih predlogov.RAC so od začetka delovanja leta 2004 izdali okrog šestdesetpriporočil.
Mosthave been in response to requests from the Commission, but the RACs also make use of their right of initiative.
Večinoma so odgovarjali na prošnje Komisije zamnenje, vendar ne oklevajo pri uporabi pravice, da izdajo mnenjena lastno pobudo.
In the latter case,they call on the Commission to address an issue they would liketo see taken under consideration.
Takrat nagovorijo Komisijo z vprašanjem, zakaterega želijo, da se obravnava.
For example, the consultation on illegal, unreported andunregulated fishing gave rise to contributions from differentparties (from NGOs like Greenpeace and WWF to fishermen'sassociations, research institutes, Member States and internationalorganisations such as the World Bank).
Na primer na posvetovanju o ukrepih za preprečevanjenezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova sorazlične zainteresirane strani (nevladne organizacije, kot sta Greenpeace in WWF, združenja ribičev, raziskovalni inštituti, države članice in mednarodne organizacije, kot je Svetovnabanka) sodelovale s svojimi prispevki.
Other recent examplesinclude the consultations held on development opportunities of Community aquaculture and on rights-based fisheriesmanagement.
Drugi nedavni primeri:posvetovanja o perspektivah razvoja ribogojstva Skupnosti in posvetovanje o upravljalnih orodjih, ki temeljijo na ribolovnih pravicah.
At a more general level, but also relevant to the CFP, the Green Paper on a Maritime Policy for the European Union was thesubject of consultation prior to its drafting and subsequently on its content.
RAC, ki so posvetovalni organi Komisije, so obenem postali forumi,na katerih se predstavniki sektorja lahko pogovarjajo z drugimiakterji, katerih dejavnost zadeva isto območje dela.
This far-reaching exercise, which concluded on 30 June, brought in over 500 written contributions from differenttrade interests and led to the organisation of over 200 events and conferences.
Izkušnje ininformacije sedaj lažje krožijo z ene obale Baltskega morja nadrugo ali iz enega severnomorskega pristanišča do drugega.Izražajo se različni interesi, ki se upoštevajo pri oblikovanju mnenj,ki se pošljejo institucijam. Znanstveniki so povabljeni, najprispevajo k delu, in vsak lahko uporabi izkušnje drugih.
As well as advising the Commission, the RACs have becomestructures for debate where representatives of the sector canengage in dialogue with other players covering similar areaswithin the sector.
Zelena knjiga o pomorski politiki Evropske unije je bila na boljsplošnem področju, ki pa zadeva tudi SRP, predmet posvetovanja,preden je bila napisana, nato pa je potekalo še posvetovanje o njeni vsebini.
The different interests at stake areexpressed and contribute to drawing up opinions to be handedin to the institutions.
Za to obsežno posvetovanje, ki se je končalo 30. junija letos, so različni krogi poslali več kot 500 pisnihprispevkov.
Scientists are invited to contribute to thiswork and the different parties benefit from each others'experiences.
Organiziranih je bilo tudi več kot 200 prireditev in konferenc.
Input from scientists o per u n E i e is he ri es and a q u a cu lt u r F
Prispevek znanstvenikov vE vr o
Yet one of the most important and innovative consultationinitiatives was the creation of the Regional Advisory Councils(RACs).
Regionalni svetovalni sveti: na čelu novegaupravljanja o in rib o g o js tv ib iš tv R
It was consequently decided to establish regional advisory bodies,whose area of competence covers either certain geographicalzones or specific fisheries with comparable operating conditions.They are made up of professionals from the fisheries sector in thewide sense and of representatives of the different interest groupsconcerned with fishing activities, such as environmental defence
Ena najpomembnejših in najinovativnejših pobud na področjuposvetovanja je oblikovanje regionalnih svetovalnih svetov (RAC –iz angleščine Regional Advisory Councils).
To protect their independence, scientific institutions are not fullmembers of the RACs. However, one of the aims of the RACs isprecisely to improve dialogue between the sector and scientists.Accordingly, from the time these bodies were first created,representatives of the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES), for example, have regularly taken part in their work asobservers or invited experts.
Ustanovitev te nove vrstesvetov je bila eden od glavnih elementov reforme SRP leta 2002:Komisija je namreč želela še bolj vključiti strokovnjake s področjaribištva in druge akterje v pripravo ukrepov za upravljanje ribištevzaradi boljšega upoštevanja regionalnih in lokalnih stvarnosti terstvarnosti, povezanih z določenimi vrstami ribolova.
These exchanges led up to an initial ICES-RAC meeting in Copenhagen in February 2006, where it wasagreed to convene an annual meeting to assess the evolution oftheir relations (the second meeting took place in January 2007).Since then, there have been numerous examples of cooperation:the RACs are invited to the ICES annual scientific meetings, the possibility of involving fishermen more closely in datacollection is discussed, analysis is under way on how tomainstream the RACs into the process of drafting CIESrecommendations for submission to the European Commission,and so on.
Želela je tudispodbuditi dialog med različnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi (ribiči,lastniki plovil, predelovalci in trgovci, ribogojci, združenja žensk v ribištvu, okoljska društva in drugi) ter med temi stranmi inznanstveniki in tudi z institucijami.
The RAC allows constructive discussionamong all the partners represented, who come from very differentbackgrounds (the sector, NGOs, fish farmers, etc.), but who all have to deal with some of the same fisheries management issues.
RAC uvaja konstruktivnorazpravo med vsemi zastopanimi partnerji, kiprihajajo iz zelo različnih okolij (sektor, nevladne organizacije, ribogojci itd.), a imajo skupno stališče glede upravljanja ribištev.
As with other consultation mechanisms, experience demonstratesthat the parties concerned have real expectations.
Praksa enako kot v primeru drugih vzpostavljenih mehanizmovposvetovanja kaže, da v zainteresiranih krogih obstaja resničnopričakovanje.
The example of revision of the cod recovery plan, for which the RACsconcerned were invited to submit their opinion to the European Commission, is particularly interesting.
Posebej zanimiv je primer revizije načrta obnovitvestaležev trsk, glede katere je Evropska komisija zaprosila zadevne RAC za njihovo mnenje.
To nurture theirrecommendation and make it as constructive as possible, the North Sea RAC and the South-western waters RAC decided to team up and organised a colloquium on the management of these stocks.
Da bi dobila podatke za svoje priporočiloin ga naredila čim bolj konstruktivnega, sta se RAC za Severnomorje in severozahodne vode odločila združiti prizadevanja inorganizirati simpozij, posvečen upravljanju teh virov. Ta je potekalmarca 2007 v Edinburgu na Škotskem.
The consultation of interested parties has consequently becomefirmly anchored in the Common Fisheries Policy and the mainbenefits of this practice are being seen.
Posvetovanje z zadevnimi krogi je sedaj torej dobro vključeno v delovanje skupne ribiške politike. Glavne koristi te prakse soopazne.
In a number of cases, Communityproposals have been adapted or changed as a result of opinionsexpressed during consultations or by RACs.
Gre za dragoceno pomoč pri pripravi pravil, prilagojenihstvarnosti na terenu: v določenih primerih so bili predlogi Skupnosti prilagojeni ali spremenjeni zaradi mnenj, izraženih naposvetovanjih ali ki so jih izdali RAC.
Initiatives, suggestionsand opinions are regularly reviewed and taken into account:players feel more involved in policy- making and would like to seetheir involvement go even further.
Pobude ter izraženi predlogiin mnenja se redno preučujejo in upoštevajo: akterji čutijo, da sovključeni v politike, ki se izvajajo, in bi želeli to še okrepiti.
There is also a betterunderstanding on behalf of the sector in regards to the need forcertain conservation measures recommended by the institutions,in the interest of a sustainable economic activity in the fisheriessector.
Opažase tudi, da strokovni krogi bolje razumejo nujnost nekaterihohranitvenih ukrepov, ki jih priporočajo institucije, in to v interesugospodarske dejavnosti trajnostnega ribolova.
In the case of the RACs, a new dynamic between playershas developed: there is far more sharing of information and bestpractice, and confidence between stakeholders and scientists isgrowing.
In končno, z RAC seje med akterji oblikovala nova dinamika: izmenjave informacij indobrih praks se znatno povečujejo, zaupanje med strokovnjaki inznanstveniki je vedno večje.
For more information, see the special feature on RACs in Fishing in Europe, No 25, March 2005, pp. 4-8, and the article on the creation of two new RACs, No 28, March 2006, p. 4.
Za več informacij glejte osrednji članek, ki smo ga RAC posvetili v Evropskem ribištvu,št. 25, marec 2005, str. 4–8, in tudi članek o ustanovitvi dveh novih RAC, št. 28, marec 2006, str. 4.
Many spontaneous contributions
Veliko lastne pobude
With 13 opinions and recommendations issued since its creation, the Pelagic RAC holds the record in terms of the number of own-initiativeopinions submitted to the Commission. The subjects are quite varied,ranging from a technical recommendation on pelagic trawl cod endsto a position on regulations concerning residues of dioxins and PCBor opinions on measures for the management of mackerel, sprat and herring.
RAC za pelagični stalež je s 13 mnenji in priporočili Komisiji, ki jih je nalastno pobudo izdal od svoje ustanovitve, nedvomno zmagovalec.Teme so zelo različne, saj segajo od tehničnega priporočila opelagični vreči do stališča o predpisih o ostankih dioksina in PCB prekmnenj o ukrepih o upravljanju skuš, papalin ali atlantskih sledov.
The opinion of the North Sea RAC on the future of the Shetland Box is a good illustration of the contributionresulting from good collaboration between the RACs andscientists.
Mnenje RAC za Severno morje o ohranitvi območja Shetlandaveliko razkriva o prispevku dobrega sodelovanja med RAC inznanstveniki.
Consequently, in July 2005, its Demersal Working Group reviewed the issue to determine theadvisability of maintaining the restricted access scheme or ofeasing the restrictions. The RAC members consulted differentscientists and experts in the field.
Zato je julija 2005 delovna skupina,zadolžena za pridnene staleže v tem RAC, obravnavalamožnost ohranitve ali omilitve te ureditve omejitve dostopa.Člani RAC so torej sprejeli mnenje več znanstvenikov, ki soizvedenci na tem področju.
Since their creation, the RACs have submitted some 30 unsolicitedopinions on different subjects, most related to the management ofsensitive stocks. This demonstrates the necessity of such bodies andtheir attentiveness to the evolution of the Common Fisheries Policy.
RAC so od ustanovitve za Komisijo izdali okrog trideset mnenj na lastno pobudo o različnih temah, večinoma povezanih z upravljanjem občutljivih staležev, s čimer so pokazali hkrati nujnost takih zasedanj in pozornost, ki jo namenjajo razvoju skupneribiške politike.
Thispreliminary work resulted in an extremely qualified opinion,quite close to the Commission's view: it confirmed the importance ofmaintaining the protection zone, but underlined the lack of precise
Napodlagi tega predhodnega dela so izdali zelo uravnoteženomnenje, ki je bilo nazadnje zelo blizu stališču Komisije: pomen
Since the ACFA has been around much longer, it would be difficult todraw up a full list of its own-initiative interventions, but over the pasttwo years it has intervened on all the important issues impacting onthe Common Fisheries Policy: maximum sustainable yield, fishingpossibilities, simplification, discards, illegal fishing, etc.
Ker ACFA obstaja še več časa, bi bilo tu težko sestaviti seznamukrepov, ki jih je sprejel na lastno pobudo, vendar je v zadnjih dvehletih to zasedanje obravnavalo vsa pomembna vprašanja, ki sovplivala na skupno ribiško politiko: največji trajnostni donos, ribolovnezmogljivosti, poenostavitev, zavržki, nezakonit ribolov itd.
data on the positive effects of the box. The RAC thereforerecommended that the box should continue on a provisional basispending the conclusions of a thorough scientific evaluation.The Commission had proposed to maintain the restricted access schemefor an additional three-year period and to continue evaluations.
ohranjanja tega varstvenega območja ni vprašljiv, poudarjeno pa je pomanjkanje natančnih podatkov o pozitivnih učinkih območja.RAC torej priporoča začasno ohranitev ureditve, dokler ne bodo znani zaključki popolne in natančne znanstvene ocene. Komisija jepredlagala ohranitev ureditve omejitve dostopa za dodatno obdobjetreh let in nadaljevanje ocenjevanja.
Meeting reports and the opinions of the ACFA, as well as links to the sites of the different RACs are available on the DG Fisheries and Maritime Affairs site:http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/governance_en.htm
Poročila o sestankih in mnenja ACFA ter povezave na spletne stranirazličnih RAC so na voljo na spletni strani GD za ribištvo in pomorskezadeve na naslednjem naslovu:http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/governance_en.htm
Chairman of the Pelagic Stocks RAC
Predsednik RAC za pelagični stalež
Chairman of the South-Western Waters RACs o per u
Predsednik RAC za jugozahodne vode
When he was elected Chairman of the Pelagic RAC two yearsago, Iain MacSween already had a lot of experience inrepresentation.
Ko je Iain MacSween pred dvema letoma postal predsednik RAC za pelagični stalež, je že imel dobre izkušnje na področjuzastopanja.
For years, he has headed the Scottish Fishermen’s Organisation.
Dolga leta je bil na čelu Scottish Fishermen’s Organisation.
On 29 June 2007, the South-western Waters RAC held itsinaugural meeting in Lorient, chaired by Victor Badiola, electedchairman on 11 April.
Otvoritveni sestanek RAC za jugozahodne vode je bil 29. junija 2007 v Lorientu pod predsedstvom Victor Badiola, ki je bil na to mesto izvoljen 11. aprila letos.
In spite of difficulties encountered insetting up the RAC due to divergences between Spain and France, the new chairman is very confident and optimistic inthe face of the diversity of the tasks ahead: “improving fisheriesmanagement and the TACs and quotas system, working on thequestion of climate change and ensuring sustainable stockmanagement.”
Kljub težavam pri ustanavljanju tega RAC zaradi razhajanj med Španijo in Francijo je novi predsednik zelo samozavesten inoptimističen glede različnih nalog, ki jih mora opraviti:„izboljšati upravljanje ribištva, boljše upravljanje sistema TAC in kvot, obravnava vprašanja podnebnih sprememb in skrb za trajnostno upravljanje staležev“.
“For small pelagic stocks, we concentrate on long-termmanagement, whereas the work of fishermen's organisations ismade up of many different things.
„Na področju pelagičnih staležev se osredotočamo na dolgoročno upravljanje staležev, medtem ko je delo organizacijribičev sestavljeno iz številnih različnih elementov… To je vsekakor zelo pozitivno.
In any case, it is very positiveand very encouraging.
In zelo spodbudno.
The RAC allows us to hold constructivetalks with other partners such as NGOs and to work out commonsolutions to propose to the Commission.
Saj nam je RAComogočil konstruktivno razpravo z drugimi partnerji, kot sonevladne organizacije, in iskanje skupnih rešitev za pripravopredlogov za Komisijo.
Obviously, it isn't easy.But it obliges partners to engage in a healthy debate and toreview their positions constantly.” is he ri es and a q u a cu lt u r F
Seveda ni lahko. Vendar to zahteva zelozdravo razpravo med partnerji in stalno prilagajanje stališč.“ o in rib o g o js tv ib iš tv R
The chairman acknowledges that his task is made easier by asituation that is generally free of conflicts.
Vendar priznava težave, povezane z omejenim številom mest,namenjenih predstavnikom iz lovnega sektorja (16) vprimerjavi s številom držav, ki morajo imeti zastopnike (5), intudi omejen proračun za prevajanje v štiri jezike (angleščino,francoščino, portugalščino in španščino) in potovanja.
Most of the pelagicstocks covered by the RAC are in a relatively good state andthe organisation does not have to deal with extremelysensitive issues, unlike its North Sea counterpart, which has toadopt a position in regards to managing scarce resources.
Vsa tavprašanja mora predložiti Evropski komisiji, ki ji morapredstaviti tudi svojo voljo za„izboljšanje sodelovanja medrazličnimi RAC, da bi lahko predložili skupna stališča“.Posebnestike je že navezal z nekaterimi predsedniki RAC, želi pa jihrazvijati še z drugimi.
Pelagic Stocks RAC
RAC za pelagične staleže
Creation:26 September 2005.Seat:Dublin, Ireland.States concerned:6 – Belgium, Spain,France, Ireland, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Chairman: Sam Lambourn.This RAC deals with fisheries in EU waterssituated west of the British Iles, a zoneaccounting for a large share of catches of deepwater species.
Ustanovitev:26. septembra 2005.Sedež:Dublin, Irska.Zainteresirane države:6 – Belgija,Španija, Francija, Irska, Nizozemska,Združeno kraljestvo.Predsednik:Sam Lambourn.Ta RAC se ukvarja z ribolovom v vodah Skupnosti zahodno od britanskegaotočja, kjer se izvaja velik del ulovaglobokomorskih vrst. Organizacija dela jestrogo geografska.
Creation:1 November 2004.Seat:Aberdeen, United Kingdom.States concerned:9 – Belgium,Denmark, Germany, Spain, France,Netherlands, Poland, Sweden and United Kingdom.
Ustanovitev: 16. avgusta 2005.Sedež: Rijswijk, Nizozemska.Zainteresirane države:10 – Danska,Nemčija, Španija, Francija, Irska,Nizozemska, Poljska, Portugalska,Švedska, Združeno kraljestvo.Predsednik: Iain MacSween.