natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C — Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the Court of Justice
C – Sodne statistike Sodišča
General activity of the Court of Justice
Splošna dejavnost Sodišča
Cases completed, new cases, cases pending (2000–06)
Zaključene zadeve, vložene zadeve, nerešene zadeve (2000–2006)
Nature of proceedings (2000–06)Judgments, orders, opinions (2006)Bench hearing action (2000–06)Subject-matter of the action (2006)Proceedings for interim measures: outcome (2006)Judgments concerning failure of a Member State to full its obligations: outcome (2006)Duration of proceedings (2000–06)
Vrste postopkov (2000–2006)Sodbe, sklepi, mnenja (2006)Sestava (2000–2006)Predmet tožbe (2006)Razglašene začasne odredbe: način rešitve (2006)Sodbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti države: način rešitve (2006)Trajanje postopkov (2000–2006)
Nature of proceedings (2000–06)Direct actions — Type of action (2006)Subject-matter of the action (2006)Actions for failure of a Member State to full its obligations (2000–06)Expedited and accelerated procedures (2000–06)
Vrste postopkov (2000–2006)Direktne tožbe – Vrsta tožbe (2006)Predmet tožbe (2006)Tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti države (2000–2006)Hitri postopek (2000–2006)
Nature of proceedings (2000–06)Bench hearing action (2006)
Vrste postopkov (2000–2006)Sestava (2006)
General trend in the work of the Court (1952–2006)
Splošni razvoj sodne dejavnosti (1952–2006)
New cases and judgments New references for a preliminary ruling (by Member State per year)New references for a preliminary ruling (by Member State and by court or tribunal)New actions for failure of a Member State to full its obligations
Vložene zadeve in sodbe Vloženi predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe (po državi članici in po letu)Vloženi predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe (po državi članici in po pristojnem sodišču)Vložene tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti države
Cases completed New cases Cases pending
Zaključene zadeve Vložene zadeve Nerešene zadeve
The figures given (gross figures) represent the total number of cases, without account being taken of the joinder of cases on the ground of similarity (one case number = one case).
Navedene številke (bruto številke) označujejo skupno število zadev, ne glede na združitve medsebojno povezanih zadev (ena številka zadeve = ena zadeva).
Completed cases2.
Zaključene zadeve2.
Nature of proceedings (2000–06)1 2
Vrste postopkov (2000–2006)1 2
References for a preliminary ruling
Predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe
Opinions/Rulings
Posebni postopki
Appeals concerning interim measures and interventions
Pritožbe zoper začasne odredbe in v zvezi z intervencijo
Direct actions Appeals
Direktne tožbe Pritožbe
Opinions/Rulings Special forms of procedure
Mnenja/odločitve Posebni postopki
The following are considered to be ‘special forms of procedure’: taxation of costs (Article 74 of the Rules of Procedure); legal aid (Article 76 of the Rules of Procedure); application to set a judgment aside (Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure); thirdparty proceedings (Article 97 of the Rules of Procedure); interpretation of a judgment (Article 102 of the Rules of Procedure); revision of a judgment (Article 98 of the Rules of Procedure); rectication of a judgment (Article 66 of the Rules of Procedure); attachment procedure (Protocol on Privileges and Immunities); cases concerning immunity (Protocol on Privileges and Immunities).
Za „posebne postopke” štejejo: odmera stroškov (člen 74 Poslovnika), pravna pomoč (člen 76 Poslovnika), ugovor zoper sodbo (člen 94 Poslovnika), ugovor tretjega (člen 97 Poslovnika), razlaga sodbe (člen 102 Poslovnika), obnova postopka (člen 98 Poslovnika), poprava sodbe (člen 66 Poslovnika), postopek v zvezi z izvršbo (Protokol o privilegijih in imunitetah), zadeve v zvezi z imuniteto (Protokol o privilegijih in imunitetah).
Completed cases — Judgments, orders, opinions (2006)1
Zaključene zadeve – Sodbe, sklepi, mnenja (2006)1
Direct actions40.36 %
Direktne tožbe40,36 %
References for a preliminary ruling46.32 %
Predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe46,32 %
Appeals concerning interim measures and interventions
Pritožbe zoper začasne odredbe in v zvezi z intervencijo0,40 %
Special forms of procedure0.40 %
Posebni postopki0,40 %
Opinions/Rulings0.20 %
Mnenja/odločitve0,20 %
References for a preliminary ruling Direct actions Appeals
Direktne tožbe Pritožbe
The figures given (net figures) represent the number of cases after joinder on the ground of similarity (a set of joined cases = one case).
Omenjene številke (neto številke) označujejo skupno število zadev ob upoštevanju združitev zaradi medsebojne povezanosti (niz združenih zadev = ena zadeva).
Orders terminating proceedings by judicial determination (inadmissibility, manifest inadmissibility and so forth).
Sklepi, s katerimi se postopek konča (nedopustnost, očitna nedopustnost...).
Orders made following an application on the basis of Article 185 or 186 of the EC Treaty (now Articles 242 EC and 243 EC), Article 187 of the EC Treaty (now Article 244 EC) or the corresponding provisions of the EA and CS Treaties, or following an appeal against an order concerning interim measures or intervention.
Sklepi, izdani na podlagi členov 185 ali 186 Pogodbe ES (postala člena 242 ES in 243 ES) ali na podlagi člena 187 Pogodbe ES (postal člen 244 ES) ali na podlagi določb Pogodb ESAE ali ESPJ, ki ustrezajo navedenim določbam, ali na podlagi pritožbe zoper sklep o začasni odredbi ali v zvezi z intervencijo.
Orders terminating the case by removal from the register, declaration that there is no need to give a decision or referral to the Court of First Instance.
Sklepi, s katerimi se postopek konča z izbrisom zadeve, z ustavitvijo postopka ali z vrnitvijo zadeve Sodišču prve stopnje v ponovno odločanje.
Completed cases — Bench hearing action (2000–06)1
Zaključene zadeve – Sestava (2000–2006)1
Chambers (5 judges)62.61 %
Senat 5 sodnikov62,61 %
Chambers (3 judges)24.32 %
Senat 3 sodnikov24,32 %
President0.23 %
Predsednik0,23 %
Tables and st a ual Rep ort 2006 t is ti cs
Sodne sta o r o č ilo 2006 tisti k e
Tables and st a
Sodne sta
Orders terminating proceedings by judicial determination (other than those removing a case from the register, declaring that there is no need to give a decision or referring a case to the Court of First Instance).
Sklepi, s katerimi se postopek konča (različni od sklepov, s katerimi se postopek konča z izbrisom zadeve, z ustavitvijo postopka ali z vrnitvijo zadeve Sodišču prve stopnje v ponovno odločanje).
Completed cases — Subject-matter of the action (2006)1
Zaključene zadeve – Predmet tožbe (2006)1
Orders
Sodbe/mnenja
Agriculture Approximation of laws Area of freedom, security and justice Brussels Convention Commercial policy Common Customs Ta ri Community own resources Company law Competition Customs union Energy Environment and consumers European citizenship External relations Fisheries policy Free movement of capital Free movement of goods Freedom of establishment Freedom of movement for persons Freedom to provide services Intellectual property Justice and home a air s Law governing the institutions Principles of Community law Privileges and immunities Regional policy Social policy Social security for migrant workers State aid Taxation Transport
Bruseljska konvencija Carinska unija Državne pomoči Energija Evropsko državljanstvo Intelektualna lastnina Kmetijstvo Konkurenca Lastna sredstva Skupnosti Načela prava Skupnosti Obdavčenje Območje svobode, varnosti in pravice Okolje in potrošniki Podjetniško pravo Politika na področju ribištva Pravo institucij Pravosodje in notranja politika Približevanje zakonodaje Privilegiji in imunitete Promet Prosti pretok blaga Prosti pretok kapitala Prosto gibanje oseb Regionalna politika Skupna carinska tarifa Socialna politika Socialna varnost delavcev migrantov Svoboda opravljanja storitev Svoboda ustanavljanja Trgovinska politika Zunanji odnosi
Proceedings for interim measures: outcome (2006)1
Razglašene začasne odredbe: način rešitve (2006)1
Total EC Treaty EA Treaty Others OVERALL TOTAL
Konkurenca Skupaj na podlagi Pogodbe ES
Completed cases — Judgments concerning failure of a Member State to full its obligations: outcome (2006)1
Zaključene zadeve – Sodbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti države: način rešitve (2006)1
Lithuania
Obsodba
Completed cases — Duration of proceedings (2000–06)1
Zaključene zadeve – Trajanje postopkov (2000–2006)1
(Decisions by way of judgments and orders)2
(sodbe in sklepi, s katerimi se postopek konča)2
The following types of cases are excluded from the calculation of the duration of proceedings: cases involving an interlocutory judgment or a measure of inquiry; opinions and rulings on agreements; special forms of procedure (namely taxation of costs, legal aid, application to set a judgment aside, thirdparty proceedings, interpretation of a judgment, revision of a judgment, rectication of a judgment, attachment procedure, cases concerning immunity); cases terminated by an order removing the case from the register, declaring that there is no need to give a decision or referring or transferring the case to the Court of First Instance; proceedings for interim measures and appeals concerning interim measures and interventions.
Pri izračunu trajanja postopkov so izključeni: zadeve, v katerih je izdana vmesna sodba ali v kateri je prišlo do pripravljalnih ukrepov, mnenja in odločitve, posebni postopki (in sicer: odmera stroškov, pravna pomoč, ugovor zoper sodbo, ugovor tretjega, razlaga sodbe, obnova postopka, poprava sodbe, postopek v zvezi z izvršbo in zadeve v zvezi z imuniteto), postopki, ki se končajo s sklepom o izbrisu zadeve, s sklepom o ustavitvi postopka, s sklepom o vrnitvi zadeve v ponovno odločanje ali o vrnitvi zadeve Sodišču prve stopnje, postopki za izdajo začasnih odredb ter pritožbe zoper začasne odredbe in v zvezi z intervencijo.
The duration of proceedings is expressed in months and tenths of months.
Čas trajanja postopkov je izražen v mesecih in desetinah mesecev.
Other than orders terminating a case by removal from the register, declaration that there is no need to give a decision or referral to the Court of First Instance.
Gre za sklepe, različne od tistih, s katerimi se postopek konča z izbrisom zadeve, z ustavitvijo postopka ali z vrnitvijo zadeve Sodišču prve stopnje v ponovno odločanje.
New cases9.
Vložene zadeve9.
Nature of proceedings (2000–06)1
Vrste postopkov (2000–2006)1
Opinion/Rulings
Mnenja/odločitve
Special forms of procedure
Posebni postopki
Appeals concerning interim measures and interventions
Pritožbe zoper začasne odredbe ali v zvezi z intervencijo
Applications for interim measures
Predlogi za izdajo začasne odredbe
Opinion/Rulings Special forms of procedure
Mnenja/odločitve Posebni postopki
New cases — Direct actions — Type of action (2006)1
Vložene zadeve – Direktne tožbe – Vrsta tožbe (2006)1
Actions for failure to full obligations96.02 %
Tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti 96,02 %
Actions for annulment Actions for failure to act Actions for damages
Ničnostne tožbe Tožbe zaradi nedelovanja Odškodninske tožbe
Actions for failure to full obligations
Tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti
Taking no account of applications for interim measures.
Brez upoštevanja predlogov za izdajo začasne odredbe.
New cases — Actions for failure of a Member State to full its obligations (2000–06)1 ual Rep t is ti cs ort 2006
Vložene zadeve – Tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti države (2000–2006)1 o r tisti k e o č ilo 2006
Total2
Skupaj2
Tables and st a ual Rep
Sodne sta o r o č ilo 2006
The actions covered are actions under Articles 93, 169, 170, 171 and 225 of the EC Treaty (now Articles 88 EC, 226 EC, 227 EC, 228 EC and 298 EC), Articles 141 EA, 142 EA and 143 EA and Article 88 CS.
Členi 93, 169, 170, 171, 225 Pogodbe ES (postali členi 88 ES, 226 ES, 227 ES, 228 ES in 298 ES), členi 141 AE, 142 AE, 143 AE in člen 88 PJ.
Including one action brought under Article 170 of the EC Treaty (now Article 227 EC).
Od katerih je bila ena tožba vložena na podlagi člena 170 Pogodbe ES (postal člen 227 ES).
New cases — Expedited and accelerated procedures (2000–06)1
Vložene zadeve – Hitri postopek (2000–2006)1
A case before the Court of Justice may be dealt with under such a procedure pursuant to Articles 62a, 104a and 118 of the Rules of Procedure, as amended with eect from 1 July 2000.
Obravnavanje zadeve po hitrem postopku pred Sodiščem je mogoče v skladu s členom 62a, 104a in 118 Poslovnika, ki je začel veljati 1. julija 2000.
Opinions/Rulings
Direktne tožbe Pritožbe Posebni postopki Mnenja/odločitve
Distribution in 2006
Porazdelitev leta 2006
Chambers (5 judges)23.39 %
Senat 5 sodnikov23,39 %
Chambers (3 judges)3.56 %
Senat 3 sodnikov3,56 %
Not assigned Full Court Small plenary Grand Chamber Chambers (5 judges)Chambers (3 judges)President
Nedodeljeno Občna seja Mali plenum Veliki senat Senat 5 sodnikov Senat 3 sodnikov Predsednik
General trend in the work of the Court (1952–2006)16.
Splošni razvoj sodne dejavnosti (1952–2006)16.
New cases and judgments
Vložene zadeve in sodbe
Gross figures; special forms of procedure are not included.
Bruto številke; brez posebnih postopkov.
Including opinions of the Court.
Vključno z mnenji.
The Court of First Instance began operating in 1989.
Sodišče prve stopnje je začelo delovati leta 1989.
General trend in the work of the Court (1952–2006) — t of Just ic
Splošni razvoj sodne dejavnosti (1952–2006) – e
New references for a preliminary ruling (by Member State per year)1 e
Vloženi predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe (po državi članici in po letu)1
Total 156 67 1 239 173 237 40 6 139 69 75 84 123 106 99 108 129 > > > 12-04-2007 16:04:31
Skupaj 156 67 1 239 173 237 40 6 139 69 75 84 123 106 99 108 129 > > > 4-06-2007 9:37:40
Case C-265/00 Campina Melkunie.
Členi 177 Pogodbe ES (postal člen 234 ES), 35(1) EU, 41 PJ, 150 AE, Protokol 1971.Zadeva Campina Melkunie, C-265/00.
General trend in the work of the Court (1952–2006) — New references for a preliminary ruling (by Member State and by court or tribunal)
Splošni razvoj sodne dejavnosti (1952-2004) – Vloženi predlogi za sprejetje predhodne odločbe (po državi članici in po pristojnem sodišču)
288 > > > Annual Report 2006
Letno poročilo 2006
Case C–265/00 Campina Melkunie.
Zadeva Campina Melkunie, C-265/00.
General trend in the work of the Court (1952–2006) — New actions for failure of a Member State to full its obligations1 t is ti cs ort 2006
Splošni razvoj sodne dejavnosti (1952–2006) – Vložene tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti države1 o r tisti k e o č ilo 2006
Total1932 860
Skupaj1932 860
The cases brought against Spain include an action under Article 170 of the EC Treaty (now Article 227 EC), brought by Belgium.
Število tožb, vloženih proti Španiji, zajema tudi tožbo na podlagi člena 170 Pogodbe ES (postal člen 227 ES), ki jo je vložila Belgija.Število tožb, vloženih proti Franciji, zajema tudi tožbo na podlagi člena 170 Pogodbe ES (postal člen 227 ES), ki jo je vložila Irska.
The cases brought against France include an action under Article 170 of the EC Treaty (now Article 227 EC), brought by Ireland.
Število tožb, vloženih proti Združenemu kraljestvu, zajema tudi tri tožbe na podlagi člena 170 Pogodbe ES (postal člen 227 ES), od katerih je eno vložila Francija in dve Španija.
A — Proceedings of the Court of First Instance in 2006
A – Dejavnost Sodišča prve stopnje v letu 2006
By Mr Bo Vesterdorf, President of the Court of First Instance
Bo Vesterdorf, predsednik
In 2006, for the second year in succession, the Court of First Instance disposed of more cases than were brought before it (436 cases disposed of compared with 432 lodged).
Leta 2006 je Sodišče prve stopnje drugo leto zapored rešilo več zadev, kot jih je bilo vloženih (436 rešenih zadev v primerjavi s 432 vloženimi).
Overall, the number of cases lodged has fallen (432 compared with 469 in 2005).
Gledano v celoti, število vloženih zadev upada (432 v primerjavi s 469 v letu 2005).
However, this drop is merely apparent and is attributable to the fact that no staff cases were lodged with the Court of First Instance in 2006 as those cases now come within the jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal 1.
Ta upad pa je le navidezen in ga je mogoče razložiti s tem, da se spori v zvezi z uslužbenci od leta 2006 ne vlagajo več na Sodišče prve stopnje, saj so od tedaj naprej v pristojnosti Sodišča za uslužbence1.
In fact, leaving aside staff cases and special forms of procedure, the number of cases lodged showed a marked increase of 33 % (387 cases compared with 291 in 2005).
V resnici je število vloženih zadev, če ne štejemo sporov v zvezi z uslužbenci in posebnih postopkov, močno naraslo, in sicer za 33 % (387 zadev v primerjavi z 291 v letu 2005).
The number of trade mark cases brought has risen by 46 % (143 in 2006 compared with 98 in 2005), while cases concerning matters other than intellectual property and staff cases increased by 26 % (244 compared with 193).
Število vloženih zadev na področju znamk je naraslo za 46 % (143 v letu 2006 v primerjavi z 98 v letu 2005), medtem ko je število drugih zadev, ki niso v zvezi z intelektualno lastnino in uslužbenci, naraslo za 26 % (244 v primerjavi s 193).
The number of cases disposed of as such has fallen (436 compared with 610), but, here too, account must be taken of the fact that, in 2005, 117 cases were disposed of by transfer to the Civil Service Tribunal.
Število rešenih zadev pa upada (436 v primerjavi s 610), vendar je pri tem treba upoštevati dejstvo, da je bilo leta 2005 117 zadev rešenih z odstopom zadev Sodišču za uslužbence.
If those cases are not taken into account, the drop in the number of cases disposed of is still real but less marked (436 compared with 493).
Če ne upoštevamo teh zadev, število rešenih zadev v letu 2006 še zmeraj upada, vendar ni tako veliko (436 v primerjavi s 493).
In short, the number of cases pending was similar to that in the previous year, that is to say slightly over 1 000 (1 029 compared with 1 033 in 2005).
Dejansko je število nerešenih zadev glede na prejšnje leto stabilno, in sicer malo nad tisoč (1029 v primerjavi s 1033 v letu 2005).
It is interesting in this connection that, as at 1 January 2007, intellectual property cases represented nearly 25 % of the total number of cases pending.
Glede tega lahko ugotovimo, da so 1. januarja 2007 zadeve, ki se nanašajo na intelektualno lastnino, pomenile približno 25 % vseh nerešenih zadev.
Accordingly, although 82 staff cases are still pending before the Court of First Instance and the first appeals against judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal have been brought before it (10 of them as at 31 December 2006), the litigation before the Court of First Instance is gradually changing character and becoming more focused on commercial litigation.
Tako so spori pred Sodiščem prve stopnje, čeprav ima to sodišče 82 nerešenih zadev v zvezi z uslužbenci in so bile nanj vložene prve pritožbe zoper sodbe Sodišča za uslužbence (in sicer jih je bilo 31. decembra 2006 10), ponovno v glavnem gospodarski spori.
The average duration of proceedings increased slightly this year, in that, leaving aside staff cases and intellectual property cases, it went from 25.6 months in 2005 to 27.8 months in 2006.
Povprečni čas trajanja postopka se je v tem letu rahlo podaljšal, saj se je, če ne upoštevamo sporov v zvezi z uslužbenci in intelektualno lastnino, s 25,6 meseca leta 2005 leta 2006 podaljšal na 27,8 meseca.
However, in 2006, use of the expedited procedure provided for by Article 76a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance was allowed by the Court in four of the 10 cases in which it was applied for.
Vendar je treba navesti, da je Sodišče prve stopnje v letu 2006 ugodilo štirim od desetih vloženih predlogov za obravnavanje po hitrem postopku, ki je predviden v členu 76a Poslovnika Sodišča prve stopnje.
Ms Pernilla Lindh, appointed to the Court of Justice as a Judge, and Mr Paolo Mengozzi and Ms Verica Trstenjak, appointed to the Court of Justice as Advocates General, left the Court of First Instance on 6 October.
6. oktobra so z delom na Sodišču prve stopnje prenehali Pernilla Lindh, ki je bila imenovana za sodnico Sodišča, ter Paolo Mengozzi in Verica Trstenjak, ki sta bila imenovana za generalna pravobranilca Sodišča.
On the same day they were replaced by Mr Nils Wahl, Mr Enzo Moavero Milanesi and Mr Miro Prek respectively.
Istega dne so jih nadomestili Nils Wahl, Enzo Moavero Milanesi in Miro Prek.
It is impossible, in the framework of this report, to give an exhaustive account of the richness of the caselaw of the Court of First Instance in 2006.
V tem poročilu ni mogoče izčrpno zajeti bogate sodne prakse Sodišča prve stopnje iz leta 2006.
Mention will be made only of the most signicant developments of the year, the selection of which is necessarily subjective to some extent 2.
Izpostavljeni bodo najpomembnejši prispevki tega leta, katerih izbira je nujno delno subjektivna2.
They relate to proceedings concerning the legality of measures (I), actions for damages (II) and, finally, applications for interim relief (III).
Nanašajo se na spore o zakonitosti (I), odškodninske spore (II) in začasne odredbe (III).
However, in 2006, the Civil Service Tribunal referred a case to the Court of First Instance.
Vendar pa je Sodišče za uslužbence v letu 2006 eno zadevo odstopilo Sodišču prve stopnje.
For example, no mention is made of antidumping law, although it gave rise to some interesting developments, in particular in the judgment of 24 October 2006 in CaseT-274/02 Ritek and Prodisc Technology v Council, not yet published in the ECR, and staff case-law.
Ni navedeno na primer protidampinško pravo, v katerem je prišlo do zanimivega razvoja, zlasti v sodbi Sodišča prve stopnje z dne 24. oktobra 2006 v zadevi Ritek in Prodisc Technology proti Svetu, T-274/02, še neobjavljena v ZOdl., in pravo uslužbencev.
Proceedings concerning the legality of measures
Spori o zakonitosti
In 2006, the most signicant developments on this question concern the denition of a challengeable act and, to a lesser extent, that of standing to bring proceedings.
V letu 2006 se najpomembnejši razvoj v zvezi s tem vprašanjem nanaša na pojem izpodbojnega akta in v manjši meri na pojem procesnega upravičenja.
Measures against which an action may be brought
Akti, zoper katere je mogoče vložiti tožbo
According to settled case-law, only measures the legal eects of which are binding on and capable of aecting the interests of the applicant by bringing about a distinct change in his legal position are acts or decisions which may be the subject of an action for annulment 3.
Glede na ustaljeno sodno prakso so ukrepi z zavezujočimi pravnimi učinki, ki lahko vplivajo na interese tožeče stranke tako, da pomembno spremenijo njen pravni položaj, akti oziroma odločbe v smislu člena 230 ES, ki so lahko predmet ničnostne tožbe.
In 2006, the current relevance of this issue was illustrated by no less than seven cases.
O aktualnosti tega vprašanja v letu 2006 priča vsaj sedem zadev3.
To begin with, three judgments dened the limits of actions for annulment of measures adopted by the European Anti-Fraud Oce (OLAF) 4.
Prvič, tri sodbe so pojasnile omejitve ničnostnih tožb, vloženih zoper akte Evropskega urada za boj proti goljujam (OLAF)4.
Commission, the Court of First Instance held that a report of an investigation carried out by OLAF implicating the applicant did not signicantly alter his legal position, given that, inter alia, it imposes no obligation, even of a procedural nature, on the authorities to which it is addressed.
V sodbi Camós Grau proti Komisiji je Sodilšče prve stopnje menilo, da poročilo OLAF o preiskavi, v katero je bila vključena tožeča stranka, ni pomembno spremenilo njenega pravnega položaja, ker to poročilo ni zavezujoče, celo procesno ne, za organe, katerim je namenjeno.
Secondly, following the same approach, the Court of First Instance made clear in its judgment in Tillack v Commission that the forwarding by OLAF of information to the national judicial authorities was not an act against which an action for annulment could be brought either.
Sodišče prve stopnje je v sodbi Tillack proti Komisiji enako navedlo, da dejstvo, da je OLAF nacionalnim sodnim organom poslal podatke, prav tako ne more biti predmet ničnostne tožbe.