natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Not only may the procedures necessary for enforcement of payment follow their course, as the Advocate General pointed out in point 38 of her Opinion, but also, as the Italian Government confirmed at the hearing, the steps required to be taken by Azienda in order to proceed to payment of its debt are not suspended.
Kot je v točki 38 sklepnih predlogov poudarila generalna pravobranilka, se namreč lahko opravljajo postopki, potrebni za izvr�bo, pa tudi ukrepi uprave Aziende, ki so potrebni za plačilo njenega dolga, nikakor niso zadržani, kot je potrdila italijanska vlada.
Quite to the contrary, the public authority debtor is obliged, under Article 14, to do everything possible to ensure that the payment procedure is completed within the period of 120 days.
Prav nasprotno, uprava dolžnik mora namreč v skladu z navedenim členom 14 storiti vse, kar je potrebno za to, da se postopek plačila konča v roku 120 dni.
In those circumstances, the answer to the question referred must be that Direct- ive 2000/35 is to be interpreted as not precluding a national provision such as Article 14 of Decree-Law No 669/1996, pursuant to which a creditor in possession of an enforceable title in respect of an unchallenged claim against a public authority as remuneration for a commercial transaction cannot proceed to forced execution against the public authority before a period of 120 days has elapsed since service of the enforceable title on the authority.
V teh okoli�činah je na zastavljeno vpra�anje treba odgovoriti, da je treba Direktivo 2000/35/ES razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje nacionalni določbi, kot je člen 14 uredbe zakona �t. 669/1996, na podlagi katere upnik, ki je pridobil izvr�ilni naslov za izterjavo nesporne terjatve do javne uprave, nastale na podlagi trgovinskega posla, ne more začeti izvr�be proti tej upravi pred potekom 120-dnevnega roka od vročitve izvr�ilnega naslova navedeni upravi.
Directive 2000/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 June 2000 on combating late payment in commercial transactions is to be interpreted as not precluding a national provision such as Article 14 of Decree-Law No 669/1996 of 31 December 1996, converted into a law, after amendment, by Law No 30 of 28 February 1997, as amended by Article 147 of Law No 388 of 23 December 2000, pursuant to which a creditor in possession of an enforceable title in respect of an unchallenged claim against a public authority as remuneration for a commercial transaction cannot proceed to forced execution against the public authority before a period of 120 days has elapsed since service of the enforceable title on the authority.
Direktivo 2000/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. junija 2000 o boju proti zamudam pri plačilih v trgovinskih poslih je treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje nacionalni določbi, kot je člen 14 uredbe zakona št. 669 z dne 31. decembra 1996, ki je bila po spremembi z zakonom št. 30 z dne 28. februarja, kot je bil spremenjen s členom 147 zakona št. 388 z dne 23. decembra 2000, spremenjena zakoħ, na podlagi katere upnik, ki je pridobil izvršilni naslov za izterjavo nesporne terjatve do javne uprave, nastale na podlagi trgovinskega posla, ne more začeti izvršbe proti tej upravi pred potekom 120-dnevnega roka od vročitve izvršilnega naslova navedeni upravi.
Case C-274/07
Zadeva C-274/07
Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Lithuania
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti proti Republiki Litvi
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2002/22/EC — Universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services — Article 26(3) — Single European emergency call number — Making available caller location information)
„Neizpolnitev obveznosti države – Direktiva 2002/22/ES – Univerzalne storitve in pravice uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami – Člen 26(3) – Enotna evropska �tevilka klica v sili – Dajanje na voljo informacij o lokaciji kličočega“
Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 11 September 2008 . . . . . . . .
Sodba Sodi�ča (drugi senat) z dne 11. septembra 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Approximation of laws — Telecommunications sector — Universal service and users’ rights — Directive 2002/22
Približevanje zakonodaj – Telekomunikacijski sektor – Univerzalne storitve in pravice uporabnikov – Direktiva 2002/22
(European Parliament and Council Directive 2002/22, Art. 26(3))
(Direktiva Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/22, člen 26(3))
SUMMARY — CASE C-274/07 to putting in place an appropriate regulatory framework, but which requires that the location information for all callers to the ‘112’ be actually transmitted to the emergency services.
POVZETEK – ZADEVA C-274/07 ne omejuje na uvedbo ustreznega pravnega okvira, ampak zahteva, da se informacije o lokaciji vseh kličočih na �tevilko „112“ dejansko posredujejo dežurnim službam.
Under Article 26(3) of Directive 2002/22 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services, Member States are to ensure that undertakings which operate public telephone networks make caller location information available to authorities handling emergencies, to the extent technically feasible, for all calls to the single European emergency call number ‘112’.
V skladu s členom 26(3) Direktive 2002/22/ES o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami morajo države članice zagotoviti, da podjetja, ki so pristojna za obratovanje javnega telefonskega omrežja, dajo organom, ki re�ujejo nujne primere, pri vseh klicih na enotno evropsko �tevilko klica v sili „112“ na voljo informacije o lokaciji kličočega, če je to tehnično izvedljivo.
The failure to acquire or adapt the equipment necessary cannot be regarded as a lack of technical feasibility within the meaning of Article 26(3).
Nepridobitev ali neprilagoditev potrebnih naprav ni mogoče �teti za pomanjkanje tehnične izvedljivosti v smislu člena 26(3).
That provision aims to improve the level of protection and the security of users of ‘112’ services and assist the emergency services in the discharge of their duties.
Namen navedene določbe je izbolj�ati raven za�čite in varnost uporabnikov storitev „112“ in pomagati dežurnim službam pri izpolnjevanju njihovih dolžnosti.
As regards the method to be employed in order to transmit location information on callers to the ‘112’ number, that article does not contain any information in that regard and therefore leaves the Member States to decide the manner in which they wish actually ensure to that that information is transmitted.
Glede sistema, ki ga je treba uporabiti za posredovanje informacij o lokaciji kličočih na �tevilko „112“, je treba ugotoviti, da v členu 26(3) ni nobene navedbe v zvezi s tem sistemom in da je zato državam članicam omogočena izbira glede načina konkretnega zagotavljanja posredovanja informacij.
It follows from the wording and the aim of that provision that it imposes on Member States, subject to technical feasibility, an obligation to achieve a result which is not limited
Iz besedila in cilja te določbe izhaja, da državam članicam nalaga, če je tehnično izvedljivo, obveznost glede rezultata, ki se
(see paras 38-40, 46, 47)
(Glej točke od 38 do 40, 46 in 47.)
11 September 2008 *
SODBA SODIŠČA (drugi senat) z dne 11. septembra 2008 *
In Case C-274/07,
V zadevi C-274/07, zaradi tožbe zaradi neizpolnitve obveznosti na podlagi člena 226 ES, vložene 7. junija 2007,
ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 7 June 2007,
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti, ki jo zastopata G. Braun in A.
Republic of Lithuania, represented by D. Kriaučiūnas, acting as Agent, defendant,
Republiki Litvi, ki jo zastopa D. Kriaučiūnas, zastopnik, tožena stranka,
2008 — CASE C-274/07
2008 – ZADEVA C-274/07
Advocate General: D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Registrar: R. Grass, having regard to the written procedure, having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion, gives the following
Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, sodni tajnik: R. Grass, na podlagi pisnega postopka, na podlagi sklepa, sprejetega po opredelitvi generalnega pravobranilca, da bo v zadevi razsojeno brez sklepnih predlogov, izreka naslednjo
By its action the Commission of the European Communities asks the Court to declare that, by not ensuring in practice that authorities handling emergencies are, to the extent technically feasible, given caller location information for all callers to the single European emergency call number ‘112’ when public telephone networks are used, the Republic of Lithuania has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 26(3) of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March
Komisija Evropskih skupnosti s to tožbo Sodi�ču predlaga, naj ugotovi, da Republika Litva s tem, da v praksi ni zagotovila, da so organom, ki re�ujejo nujne primere, pri vseh klicih iz javnega telefonskega omrežja na enotno evropsko �tevilko klica v sili „112“ dane na voljo informacije o lokaciji kličočega, če je to tehnično izvedljivo, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz člena 26(3) Direktive 2002/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi
2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (‘Universal Service’ Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
KOMISIJA PROTI LITVI z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah) (UL L 108, str. 51).
‘It is important that users should be able to call the single European emergency number “112”, and any other national emergency telephone numbers, free of charge, from any telephone, including public pay telephones, without the use of any means of payment. … Caller location information, to be made available to the emergency ser -vices, will improve the level of protection and the security of users of “112” services and assist the emergency services, to the extent technically feasible, in the discharge of their duties, provided that the transfer of calls and associated data to the emergency services concerned is guaranteed….’
„Pomembno je, da lahko uporabniki pokličejo enotno evropsko �tevilko za klic v sili ‚112‘ in vse druge nacionalne telefonske �tevilke za klic v sili brezplačno po vsakem telefonu, vključno z javnimi plačilnimi telefoni, brez uporabe kakr�nega koli plačilnega sredstva. […] Informacija o lokaciji kličočega, ki mora biti na voljo dežurnim službam, bo izbolj�ala raven za�čite in varnost uporabnikov storitev ‚112‘ in pomagala dežurnim službam, kolikor je to tehnično izvedljivo, pri izpolnjevanju njihovih dolžnosti, če je zagotovljeno, da se klici in pripadajoči podatki po�ljejo zadevnim dežurnim službam. […]“
Article 26(3) of the Universal Service Directive provides:
Člen 26(3) Direktive o univerzalnih storitvah določa:
‘Member States shall ensure that undertakings which operate public telephone networks make caller location information available to authorities handling emergen-
„Države članice zagotovijo, da podjetja, ki so pristojna za obratovanje javnega telefonskega omrežja, dajo organom, ki re�ujejo nujne primere, pri vseh klicih na enotno
2008 — CASE C-274/07 cies, to the extent technically feasible, for all calls to the single European emergency call number “112”.’
2008 – ZADEVA C-274/07 evropsko �tevilko klica v sili ‚112‘ na voljo informacije o lokaciji kličočega, če je to tehnično izvedljivo.“
According to Article 38(1) of the Universal Service Directive, Member States are to adopt and publish the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive by 24 July 2003 at the latest and they are to immediately inform the Commission thereof.
Člen 38(1) Direktive o univerzalnih storitvah določa, da morajo države članice sprejeti in objaviti zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do 24. julija 2003 in o tem takoj obvestiti Komisijo.
They are to apply those provisions from 25 July 2003.
Te predpise morajo uporabljati od 25. julija 2003 dalje.
In accordance with Article 2, read in combination with Article 54 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (OJ 2003 L 236, p.
Republika Litva je bila v skladu s členom 2 Akta o pogojih pristopa Če�ke republike, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije, Slova�ke republike k Evropski uniji in prilagoditvah pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija (UL 2003, L 236, str.
33) (the ‘Act of Accession’), the Republic of Lithuania was to comply with the Universal Service Directive from the date of its accession to the European Union, on 1 May 2004.
33), skupaj s členom 54, od datuma pristopa k Evropski uniji, in sicer do 1. maja 2004, zavezana, da se uskladi z Direktivo o univerzalnih storitvah.
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) (OJ 2002 L 108, p.
Člen 19(1) Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/21/ES z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (okvirna direktiva) (UL L 108, str.
33) (the ‘Framework Dir -ective’) provides in Article 19(1):
33, v nadaljevanju: okvirna direktiva) določa:
‘Where the Commission, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(2), issues recommendations to Member States on the harmonised application of the provisions in this Directive and the Specific Directives in order to further the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 8, Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities take the utmost account of those recommendations in carrying out their tasks.
„Kadar Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 22(2) izda državam članicam priporočila o usklajeni uporabi določb iz te direktive in posebnih direktiv za nadaljnje doseganje ciljev iz člena 8, države članice zagotovijo, da nacionalni regulativni organi pri opravljanju svojih nalog ta priporočila dosledno upo�tevajo.
Where a national regulatory authority chooses not to follow a recommendation, it shall inform the Commission giving the reasoning for its position.’
Kadar se nacionalni regulativni organ odloči, da ne bo upo�teval priporočila, o tem obvesti Komisijo z navedbo razlogov za svoje stali�če.“
The 10th recital in the preamble to Commission Recommendation 2003/558/EC of 25 July 2003 on the processing of caller location information in electronic communication networks for the purpose of location-enhanced emergency call services (OJ 2003 L 189, p.
V deseti uvodni izjavi Priporočila Komisije 2003/558/ES z dne 25. julija 2003 o ravnanju z informacijami o lokaciji kličočega v omrežjih elektronskega komuniciranja z namenom opravljanja storitev klicev v sili, ki jih je treba locirati, (UL L 189, str.
49) is worded as follows:
49) je navedeno:
‘The effective implementation of location-enhanced emergency call services requires that the caller’s location as determined by the provider of the public telephone network or service is transmitted automatically to any appropriate public safety answering point that can receive and use the location data provided.’
„Za učinkovito opravljanje storitev klicev v sili, ki jih je treba locirati, morajo biti tudi informacije o lokaciji kličočega, kot jih opredeli ponudnik omrežja ali javne storitve govorne telefonije, samodejno posredovane na vsako centralo za sprejemanje klicev v sili, ki lahko sprejme in uporabi informacije o lokaciji, ki so ji poslane.“
Points 4 and 13 of Recommendation 2003/558 state:
V točkah 4 in 13 Priporočila 2003/558 je navedeno:
For every emergency call made to the European emergency call number 112, public telephone network operators should, initiated by the network, forward (push) to public safety answering points the best information available as to the location of the caller, to the extent technically feasible.
Operaterji omrežij javne telefonije morajo v zvezi z vsakim klicem v sili na enotno evropsko �tevilko klica v sili 112, ki izvira iz omrežja, v centrale za sprejemanje klicev v sili posredovati (‚push‘) najbolj�e informacije, ki jih imajo na voljo o lokaciji kličočega, če je to tehnično izvedljivo.
For the intermediate period up to the conclusion of the review as referred to in point 13 below, it is acceptable that operators make available location information on request only (pull).
V vmesnem obdobju, preden zaključijo oceno iz točke 13 spodaj, se lahko operaterjem odobri, da informacije o lokaciji posredujejo le na zahtevo (‚pull‘).
Member States should require their national authorities to report to the Commission on the situation of E112 implementation by the end of 2004 so that the Commission can undertake a review taking into account the emerging requirements from public safety answering points and emergency services and the evolutions and availability of technological capabilities for location determination.’
Države članice morajo nacionalne organe pozvati, da do konca leta 2004 Komisiji predložijo poročilo o stanju uporabe �tevilke E112, da bi lahko zadnjenavedena ob upo�tevanju novih zahtev central za sprejemanje ocenila klice v sili in nujnih storitev ter doseženi napredek in razpoložljiva tehnična sredstva za določitev lokacije.“
‘Providers of public communications networks and electronic communications ser -vices accessible to the public shall supply, without the consent of subscribers or users of electronic communications services, information on location (together with flow data) to bodies responsible for processing emergency calls, in particular to the judicial authorities, the ambulance service, the fire service and other emergency services in order for those bodies to answer calls from subscribers and users of electronic communications services and respond appropriately ….’
„Ponudniki javnih komunikacijskih omrežij in elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, dostopnih javnosti, brez soglasja naročnika ali uporabnika elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev informacije o lokaciji (in podatke o dogodku) posredujejo organom, ki re�ujejo nujne primere, zlasti pravosodnim organom, re�evalnim vozilom, gasilcem in drugim dežurnim službam, da bi ti organi lahko odgovorili na klice naročnikov ali uporabnikov elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev in se ustrezno odzvali. […]“
As amended, Article 65(4) states that providers of public communications networks and electronic communications services accessible to the public are required to provide caller location information free of charge to the Joint Emergency Services Centre and that the costs of acquisition, installation (adaptation), refurbishment and operation of the equipment necessary for that purpose shall be reimbursed out of public funds.
Tako spremenjen člen 65(4) določa, da morajo ponudniki javnih komunikacijskih omrežij in elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, dostopnih javnosti, informacije o lokaciji kličočega brezplačno posredovati v skupno centralo dežurnih služb in da se stro�ki za pridobitev, namestitev (prilagoditev), obnovitev in delovanje opreme, ki je potrebna za ta namen, povrnejo iz javnih sredstev.
In addition to the Law on electronic communications, the Republic of Lithuania adopted a number of other acts intended to implement Article 26(3) of the Universal Service Directive.
Republika Litva je poleg zakona o elektronskih komunikacijah sprejela več aktov za izvajanje člena 26(3) Direktive o univerzalnih storitvah.
They include:
Med njimi so:
By letter of formal notice of 10 April 2006, the Commission informed the Republic of Lithuania of its concerns regarding the incorrect application of Article 26(3) of
Komisija je v pisnem opominu z dne 10. aprila 2006 Republiko Litvo obvestila o dvomih v zvezi z nepravilno uporabo člena 26(3) Direktive o univerzalnih storitvah.
2008 — CASE C-274/07 the Universal Service Directive.
2008 – ZADEVA C-274/07
Those concerns arose from the fact that when emergency calls to the single European emergency number ‘112’ come from a mobile telephone, caller location information is not provided to the emergency services.
Ta dvom je nastal, ker – kadar so klici v sili na enotno evropsko �tevilko klica v sili „112“ prihajali z mobilnega telefona – informacije o lokaciji kličočega niso bile posredovane dežurni službi.
In their response sent on 11 July 2006, the Lithuanian authorities confirmed that fact, explaining that not all the operators of public communications networks and electronic communications services accessible to the public had the technical equipment necessary for that purpose and that the authorities had not reached an agreement with the operators concerning the responsibility for costs related to locating callers.
Litovski organi so v odgovoru z dne 11. julija 2006 to okoli�čino potrdili, pri čemer so pojasnili, da vsi operaterji javnih komunikacijskih omrežij in elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev, dostopnih javnosti, niso imeli tehničnih naprav, ki so potrebne za te namene, in da se organi niso strinjali z navedenimi operaterji glede kritja stro�kov v zvezi z lociranjem kličočega.
On 25 September 2006, the Lithuanian Government sent to the Commission the most recent information, setting out the measures envisaged in order to implement Article 26(3) of the Universal Service Directive.
Litovska vlada je 25. septembra 2006 Komisiji poslala novej�e informacije, pri čemer je navedla predvidene ukrepe za izvajanje člena 26(3) Direktive o univerzalnih storitvah.
On 18 October 2006, the Commission issued a reasoned opinion in which it stated that the Republic of Lithuania was unable to ensure in practice that caller location information is made available where emergency calls to the ‘112’ number are made from a mobile telephone, thereby failing to fulfil its obligations under Article 26(3) of the Universal Service Directive.
Komisija je 18. oktobra 2006 izdala obrazloženo mnenje, v katerem je ugotovila, da Republika Litva v praksi ni zagotovila dajanja na voljo informacij o lokaciji kličočega, kadar so klici v sili na �tevilko „112“ prihajali z mobilnega telefona, in tako ni izpolnila obveznosti iz člena 26(3) Direktive o univerzalnih storitvah.
At the same time, it called on that Member State to take the measures necessary in order to comply with that opinion within two months of its notification.
To državo članico je hkrati pozvala, naj v roku dveh mesecev od njegovega prejema sprejme ukrepe, potrebne za uskladitev s tem mnenjem.
In its reply of 12 January 2007, the Lithuanian Government indicated that a draft law amending Article 65 of the Law on electronic communications had been put before the Lithuanian Parliament, providing that the costs relating to the caller location information transmission service borne by the providers of public mobile telephone networks were to be financed from the national budget.
Republika Litva je v odgovoru z dne 12. januarja 2007 navedla, da je bil predlog zakona o spremembi člena 65 zakona o elektronskih komunikacijah predložen litovskemu parlamentu in da je določal, da se stro�ki v zvezi s storitvijo posredovanja informacij o lokaciji kličočega, ki jih je imajo ponudniki storitev javnih omrežij mobilne telefonije, krijejo iz državnega proračuna.
Appended to that letter was an agreement concluded on 4 December 2006 between the Joint Emergency Services Centre and the mobile telephone operators relating to caller location services.
Temu dopisu je bil priložen sporazum o storitvah lociranja kličočega, ki je bil sklenjen 4. decembra 2006 med skupno centralo dežurnih služb in operaterji mobilne telefonije.