natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju izjave visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko/podpredsednice Komisije Catherine Ashton z dne 22. junija 2011 o registraciji strank v Rusiji,
having regard to the statement by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission (HR/VP), Catherine Ashton, of 22 June 2011 on party registration in Russia,
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je Rusija kot članica Sveta Evrope in podpisnica Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah dolžna spoštovati demokratična načela;
having regard to the obligation to uphold democratic principles entailed by Russia's membership in the Council of Europe and as a signatory of the European Convention of Human Rights,
ob upoštevanju izida vrhunskega srečanja med EU in Rusijo, ki je dne 9. in 10. junija 2011 potekalo v Nižnem Novgorodu,
having regard to the outcome of the EU-Russia Summit held in Nizhny Novgorod on 9-10 June 2011,
ker je politični pluralizem temelj demokracije in moderne družbe in vir politične legitimnosti,
whereas political pluralism is a cornerstone of democracy and modern society, and a source of political legitimacy,
ker je Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice 12. aprila 2011 izrazilo kritiko v zvezi z okornimi postopki za registracijo političnih strank v Rusiji, ki niso v skladu z Evropsko konvencije o človekovih pravicah,
whereas on 12 April 2011 the European Court of Human Rights expressed its criticism over the cumbersome registration procedures for political parties in Russia, which do not comply with the European Convention on Human Rights,
ker so opazovalci urada za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice leta 2003 v času parlamentarnih volitev obiskali Rusijo in priporočili, naj standardna misija OVSE začne delovati šest tednov pred volitvami, naj traja 60 dni in naj šteje 400 opazovalcev volitev za kratko obdobje,
whereas ODIHR observers visited Russia during the 2003 parliamentary election and advised that a standard OSCE mission should start work six weeks before the elections and comprise 60 long-term and 400 short-term observers,
ker je še vedno prisotna zaskrbljenost zaradi dogodkov v Ruski federaciji, ki kažejo na nespoštovanje in neupoštevanje človekovih pravic ter skupno sprejetih demokratičnih načel, predpisov in postopkov; ker je Ruska federacija polnopravna članica Sveta Evrope in Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ter Združenih narodov in se je s tem zavezala k spoštovanju načel demokracije in človekovih pravic, kot spodbujajo te organizacije,
whereas there remains concern about developments in the Russian Federation with regard to respect for and the protection of human rights and respect for commonly agreed democratic principles, rules and procedures; whereas the Russian Federation is a full member of the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe and the UN, and has therefore committed itself to the principles of democracy and respect for human rights as promoted by these organisations,
ponovno poudarja svoje prepričanje, da je Rusija še vedno med najpomembnejšimi partnericami Evropske unije pri vzpostavljanju strateškega sodelovanja, saj si z njo deli gospodarske in trgovske interese pa tudi željo po tesnem sodelovanju v skupni soseščini in na svetovni ravni;
Reaffirms its belief that Russia remains one of European Union's most important partners in building strategic cooperation, sharing not only economic and trade interests but also the objective of acting closely together in the common neighbourhood, as well as at global level;
potrjuje svojo resolucijo z dne 9. junija 2009 o vrhunskem srečanju v Nižnem Novgorodu;
Reconfirms its resolution of 9 June 2011 on the EU-Russia Summit in Nizhny Novgorod;
obžaluje odločitev ruskih oblasti, da zavrnejo registracijo stranke Parnas za volitve v dumo decembra 2011; ruske oblasti poziva, naj zagotovijo svobodne in poštene volitve ter umaknejo vse odločitve in pravila, ki so s tem v nasprotju;
Deplores the decision by the Russian authorities to reject the registration of the People's Freedom Party (PARNAS) for the forthcoming Duma elections in December 2011; calls on the Russian authorities to guarantee free and fair elections and to withdraw all decisions and rules that oppose this principle;
ponovno poudarja svojo zaskrbljenost zaradi težav, s katerimi se soočajo politične stranke pri registraciji za volitve, kar dejansko omejuje politično konkurenco v Rusiji, zmanjšuje izbiro, ki je na voljo volilnemu telesu, in kaže na resnične ovire, ki še vedno stojijo na poti političnemu pluralizmu v državi;
Reaffirms its concerns regarding the difficulties faced by the political parties in registering for elections, which effectively constrain political competition in Russia, reduce the choice available to its electorate and show that there are still real obstacles to political pluralism in the country;
poudarja, da bi morale volitve v rusko dumo temeljiti na izvajanju volilnih standardov, ki sta jih določila Svet Evrope in OVSE; poziva ruske oblasti, naj organizaciji OVSE in Svetu Evrope dovolijo napotitev dolgoročne misije za opazovanje volitev in naj z njo sodelujejo od samega začetka njenega delovanja, visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico Komisije pa poziva, naj vztraja pri napotitvi takšne misije; poziva k tesnemu sodelovanju te misije za opazovanje s civilno družbo in s skupinami za spremljanje;
Emphasises that the State Duma elections should be based on the implementation of election standards set by the Council of Europe and the OSCE; urges the Russian authorities to allow the OSCE/Council of Europe long-term election observation mission and to cooperate fully with it from its earliest stage, and calls on the HR/VP to insist on the establishment of a mission for this purpose; calls for close cooperation by said observation mission with civil society and the monitoring groups;
obžaluje šestmesečno prepoved potovanja, ki je bila uvedena proti Borisu Nemtsovu dne 5. julija 2011, in poziva k njeni takojšnji prekinitvi;
Deplores the six-month travel ban imposed on Boris Nemtsov on 5 July 2011 and calls for it to be lifted immediately;
izraža zaskrbljenost o predlogu osnutka zakona, o katerem bodo razpravljali v dumi in ki bi ruskim sodiščem omogočil neupoštevanje sodb Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice na nekaterih področjih, saj je takšna pobuda v nasprotju z osnovnimi načeli Evropske konvencije za človekove pravice; pozdravlja nedavno odločitev ruske dume, da tega osnutku zakona začasno ne bo preučevala, in upa, da bo na koncu od njega tudi odstopila;
Expresses its concern about the proposal of a draft law, to be discussed in the Duma, which would enable Russian courts to ignore the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights in some areas, such an initiative contradicting the basic principles of the European Convention on Human Rights; welcomes the recent decision of the Russian Duma not to consider the draft law for the time being and hopes it will finally renounce that initiative;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko ter podpredsednici Komisije, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, OVSE, Svetu Evrope ter predsedniku, vladi in parlamentu Ruske federacije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice President of the Commission, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the OSCE, the Council of Europe and the President, Government and Parliament of the Russian Federation.
B7-0392 , 0393 , 0400 in 0456/2011
B7-0392 , 0393 , 0400 and 0456/2011
ob upoštevanju člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in členov 3, 18, 20, 21, 67, 77 in 80 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Article 2 TEU and Articles 3, 18, 20, 21, 67, 77 and 80 TFEU,
ob upoštevanju člena 45 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
having regard to Article 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985,
having regard to the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985,
ob upoštevanju Konvencije o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma z dne 19. junija 1990,
having regard to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, of 19 June 1990,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic UL L 158, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) UL L 105, 13.4.2006, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 2. aprila 2009 o uporabi Direktive 2004/38/ES o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic UL C 137 E, 27.5.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 2 April 2009 on the application of Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States OJ C 137 E, 27.5.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o migracijah z dne 4. maja 2011 ( KOM(2011)0248 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 4 May 2011 on migration ( COM(2011)0248 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 9. junija 2011,
having regard to the conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council of 9 June 2011,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 24. junija 2011,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 24 June 2011,
ker je svoboda gibanja postala eden od stebrov državljanstva EU in eden od temeljev tega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki obsega pravico do svobodnega gibanja in prebivanja v vseh državah članicah ter uživanja enakih pravic, zaščite in jamstev, vključno s prepovedjo vseh oblik diskriminacije na osnovi državljanstva,
whereas freedom of movement has become one of the pillars of EU citizenship and one of the foundations of the EU as an area of freedom, security and justice, enshrining the right to move and reside freely in all Member States while enjoying the same rights, protections and guarantees, including the ban on all forms of discrimination based on nationality,
ker se lahko svoboda gibanja v EU v skladu z zakonikom o schengenskih mejah in členom 45 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah pod posebnimi pogoji prenese tudi na državljane tretjih držav, ki zakonito prebivajo v EU,
whereas, according to the Schengen Borders Code and Article 45 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, freedom of movement in the EU may, under specific conditions, also be extended to third-country nationals legally resident in the EU,
ker so se zlasti v preteklem letu ljudje množično selili iz več severnoafriških držav; ker je bil schengenski sistem pred nedavnim pod pritiskom zaradi nekaterih držav članic, ki so zaradi nenadnega pritoka migrantov razmišljale o ponovni uvedbi nadzora na državnih mejah,
whereas, especially in the last year, there has been a massive displacement of people from several North African countries; whereas the Schengen system has recently come under pressure, with some Member States considering the reintroduction of national border controls in the face of the sudden influx of migrants,
ker je Komisija 4. maja 2011 predstavila več pobud za bolj strukturiran pristop k preseljevanju, pri čemer je upoštevala zlasti nedavne dogodke v sredozemski regiji in vključila vanje predlog o Schengnu; ker se Komisija v sklepih Evropskega sveta z dne 23. in 24. junija 2011 poziva k predstavitvi predloga o „zaščitnem mehanizmu“ za odziv na „izredne okoliščine“, ki bi lahko ogrozile schengensko sodelovanje,
whereas on 4 May 2011 the Commission presented several initiatives for a more structured approach to migration, taking into account in particular the recent developments in the Mediterranean region and including a proposal on Schengen; whereas the European Council conclusions of 23-24 June 2011 ask the Commission to present a proposal on a ‘safeguard mechanism’ in order to respond to ‘exceptional circumstances’ that might put the Schengen cooperation at risk,
ker so schengenska pravila, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek notranjih meja, določena v zakoniku o schengenskih mejah, katerega členi od 23 do 26 določajo ukrepe in postopke za začasno ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah, ker pa tak nadzor, če je enostranski, onemogoča, da bi prevladali skupni interesi EU,
whereas the Schengen rules governing the movement of persons across internal borders are defined in the Schengen Borders Code, Articles 23 to 26 of which set out measures and procedures for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls, but whereas such controls, being of a unilateral nature, do not allow the collective EU interest to prevail,
ker se je z vzpostavitvijo schengenskega območja določila skupna zunanja meja, za katere upravljanje je EU po členu 80 PDEU skupno odgovorna; ker EU še ni v celoti izpolnila te zahteve, čeprav je že poskušala vzpostaviti učinkovit nadzor in sodelovanje med carinskimi, policijskimi in pravosodnimi organi, razviti skupno priseljevalno, azilno in vizumsko politiko ter vzpostaviti schengenski informacijski sistem druge generacije (SIS II) ter vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS),
whereas the creation of the Schengen area defined a common external border, which the EU has a joint responsibility to manage under Article 80 TFEU; whereas the EU has not yet fully complied with this requirement, although it has sought to establish effective controls and cooperation between customs, police and judicial authorities, to develop a common immigration, asylum and visa policy and to establish the second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) and the Visa Information System (VIS),
ker je za odpravo nadzora na notranjih mejah nujno, da države članice popolnoma zaupajo druga drugi, da so sposobne v celoti izvesti spremljevalne ukrepe, ki omogočajo odpravo tega nadzora, ker je varnost na schengenskem območju odvisna od tega, kako strogo in učinkovito posamezne države članice izvajajo nadzor na zunanjih mejah, ter od kakovosti in hitrosti izmenjave informacij prek schengenskega informacijskega sistema; ker neustrezno delovanje katerega koli teh elementov ogroža varnost EU kot celote,
whereas the abolition of internal border controls requires the Member States to have complete trust in one another's capacity to implement fully the accompanying measures allowing such controls to be lifted; whereas the security of the Schengen area depends on the rigour and effectiveness with which each Member State carries out controls at its external borders, as well as on the quality and speed of exchanges of information via the SIS; whereas the inadequate functioning of any of these elements presents a risk to the security of the EU as a whole,
ker je treba ukiniti dvojne standarde, ki se trenutno uporabljajo za Schengen, ko se za vse države kandidatke postavljajo zelo visoke zahteve, države, ki so že članice schengenskega območja, pa obravnavajo izjemno popustljivo;
whereas the double standards currently operating in respect of Schengen, whereby high demands are placed on all candidate countries while those countries already belonging to the Schengen area are treated very complacently, should be abolished,
ker člen 77 PDEU navaja, da Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku sprejmeta ukrepe, med drugim tudi glede kontrole, ki se opravi pri osebah pri prehodu zunanjih meja, če ni preverjanja oseb pri prehajanju notranjih meja ne glede na njihovo državljanstvo,
whereas Article 77 TFEU states that Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt measures concerning, inter alia, the checks to which persons crossing external borders are subject in the absence of any controls of persons, whatever their nationality, when crossing internal borders,
poudarja, da je prosti pretok ljudi na schengenskem območju eden največjih dosežkov evropskega povezovanja, da Schengen pozitivno vpliva na življenje stotisočev državljanov EU, ker lajša prehajanje meja in razvoj gospodarstva, ter da je svoboda gibanja temeljna pravica in eden stebrov za državljanstvo EU, ki se izvaja po pogojih iz pogodb in Direktive 2004/38/ES;
Stresses that free movement of people within the Schengen area has been one of the biggest achievements of European integration, that Schengen has a positive impact on the lives of hundreds of thousands of EU citizens, both by making border crossing convenient and by boosting the economy, and that freedom of movement is a fundamental right and a pillar of EU citizenship, the conditions for the exercise of which are laid down in the Treaties and in Directive 2004/38/EC;
Upravljanje schengenskega območja/ocenjevalni mehanizem
Schengen governance/evaluation mechanism
močno priporoča, da se okrepi upravljanje schengenskega območja, da bi se vsem državam članicam pomagalo zagotoviti učinkovit nadzor nad njihovim delom zunanjih meja EU, okrepilo medsebojno zaupanje in povečalo zaupanje v učinkovitost sistema, s katerim EU upravlja preseljevanje; odločno poudarja, da je potrebna večja solidarnost do držav članic, v katerih je pritok migrantov največji, da se jim pomaga reševati te izjemne razmere;
Strongly recommends strengthening the Schengen governance in order to help ensure that each Member State can effectively control its section of the EU's external borders, to reinforce mutual trust and to build confidence in the effectiveness of the EU system of migration management; firmly stresses the need for greater solidarity towards those Member States facing the greatest influx of migrants in order to help them deal with extraordinary situations of this nature;
poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti, da bodo države članice schengenska pravila pravilno izvajale in uporabljale tudi po pristopu, poudarja, da to pomeni tudi zgodnjo pomoč državam članicam v težavah, tako da lahko odpravijo pomanjkljivosti s praktično pomočjo agencij EU; meni, da je treba obstoječi ocenjevalni mehanizem utrditi in spremeniti v sistem EU;
Stresses the need to ensure the proper implementation and application of the Schengen rules by the Member States even after their accession; points out that this also means helping, at an early stage, those Member States facing problems so that they can remedy their deficiencies with practical support from the EU agencies; is of the opinion that the existing evaluation mechanism should be reinforced and made into an EU system;
meni, da je ocenjevalni mehanizem učinkovit, ker vsebuje možnost sankcij, kadar se pomanjkljivosti ne odpravijo in ogrožajo splošno varnost schengenskega območja; opozarja, da je osnovni namen takih sankcij odvračanje;
Believes that the effectiveness of the evaluation mechanism lies in the possibility of sanctions in the event that deficiencies persist and jeopardise the overall security of the Schengen area; recalls that the primary purpose of such sanctions is dissuasion;
Zakonik o schengenskih mejah
Schengen Borders Code
meni, da so vsi potrebni pogoji za začasno ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah v izrednih okoliščinah že jasno določeni v Uredbi št. 562/2006 (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah), katere členi 23, 24 in 25 predvidevajo možnost ponovne uvedbe nadzora na notranjih mejah zgolj v primeru resne grožnje javnemu redu ali notranji varnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi pobudo, da določi strogo izvajanje teh členov v državah članicah;
Believes that the necessary conditions for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls in exceptional circumstances are already clearly set out in Regulation No 562/2006 (Schengen Borders Code), Articles 23, 24 and 25 of which provide for the possibility of reintroducing internal border controls only where there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security; calls on the Commission to present an initiative aimed at defining the strict application of these Articles by the Member States;
zato meni, da dodatna nova odstopanja od obstoječih pravil, kot so dodatni razlogi za ponovno uvedbo „izjemnega“ nadzora na mejah zagotovo ne bi krepili schengenskega sistema; poudarja, da pritoka migrantov in prosilcev za azil na zunanjih mejah samega po sebi nikakor ni mogoče obravnavati kot dodatni razlog za ponovno uvedbo mejnega nadzora;
Is therefore of the opinion that any new additional exemptions from the current rules, such as new grounds for reintroducing border controls on an ‘exceptional’ basis would definitely not reinforce the Schengen system; points out that on no account can the influx of migrants and asylum seekers at external borders per se be considered an additional ground for the reintroduction of border controls;
meni, da so nedavne težave s Schengnom zakoreninjene v odporu do izvajanja skupnih evropskih politik na drugih področjih, med katerimi sta najpomembnejša evropski azilni sistem in sistem preseljevanja (ki bi vključeval odpravo nezakonitega priseljevanja in boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu);
Is of the opinion that the recent problems with Schengen are rooted in a reluctance to implement common European policies in other fields, most crucially a common European asylum and migration system (which would include tackling irregular immigration and fighting organised crime);
ponavlja, da je izredno pomembno doseči napredek pri tem, saj je bilo leto 2012 določeno za rok za vzpostavitev skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema;
Reiterates that it is of the utmost importance to make progress in this respect, given that the deadline for establishing a common European asylum system has been set for 2012;
ponovno poudarja, da trdno nasprotuje kakršnemu koli novemu schengenskemu mehanizmu, ki bi imel drugačne cilje kot omogočati svobodo gibanja in krepiti EU pri upravljanju schengenskega območja;
Reaffirms its firm opposition to any new Schengen mechanism with objectives other than those of enhancing freedom of movement and reinforcing EU governance of the Schengen area;
poudarja, da bo vsak poskus odmika od člena 77 PDEU kot pravilne pravne podlage za vse ukrepe na tem področju pomenil odmik od pogodb EU, in si pridržuje pravico do uporabe vseh razpoložljivih pravnih sredstev, če bo potrebno;
Stresses that any attempt to move away from Article 77 TFEU as the proper legal basis for all measures in this field will be considered to be a deviation from the EU Treaties, and reserves the right to use all available legal remedies if necessary;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Svetu Evrope ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Council of Europe and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti členov 9 in 10 protokola 1 k tem pogodbam o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov v Evropski uniji,
having regard to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular to Articles 9 and 10 of Protocol 1 thereto on the role of national parliaments in the European Union,