natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ponovno poudarja potrebo po preseganju trenutnega neravnovesja glede zmogljivosti na področju načrtovanja in izvajanja civilnih in vojaških operacij z vzpostavitvijo stalne civilno-vojaške zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje ali operativnega štaba (OHQ) na ravni EU, ki bo EU omogočal hitrejše in stroškovno učinkovitejše odzivanje; poudarja, da so se sporazumi Berlin Plus izvajali le v omejenem obsegu, saj so bili do sedaj omejeni na prevzeme obstoječih misij Nata, in opozarja na težave, povezane z okvirom ’nation track’, ki temelji na uporabi petih nacionalnih operativnih štabov, kar težavam pri oblikovanju sil in večji zapletenosti usklajevanja civilnih in vojaških zmogljivosti dodaja pomanjkanje predhodnega načrtovanja;
Reaffirms the need to overcome the current imbalance in terms of planning and conduct capabilities of civilian and military operations by providing the EU with a permanent civil-military planning and conduct capacity or Operational Headquarters (OHQ) which will allow for a more reactive and cost-effective EU response; points out that the Berlin Plus arrangements have been put to only limited use, having been confined to date to takeovers of pre-existing NATO missions, and draws attention to the problems connected with the framework nation track, which is based on the use of five national OHQs, adding the lack of pre-planning to the difficulties in force generation and increased complexity of coordinating civilian and military capabilities;
meni, da obstoječi operativni center, ki je sicer dobrodošel prvi korak, ne izpolnjuje zahtev in ravni ambicij stalnih operativnih štabov in da ga je treba preoblikovati v stalni center ter mu omogočiti upravljanje večjih misij in dodeliti ustrezne kadrovske vire in operativno infrastrukturo ter odpraviti nezanesljivost komunikacijskih in informacijskih sistemov EU, ki je nastala zaradi tega, ker ni stalne strukture za poveljevanje in nadzor (C2) (in ustreznega pravnega okvira), kar lahko negativno vpliva tudi na poznavanje situacije; se zavzema za to, da se vojaški operativni štab in civilni štab nahajata na isti lokaciji, kar bi omogočilo izvajanje celotnega nabora vojaških in civilnih operacij ter popolno izkoriščanje morebitnih sinergijskih učinkov, ob upoštevanju posebnosti civilne in vojaške hierarhije poveljevanja, različnih postopkov odločanja in dogovorov glede financiranja;
Considers that the existing Operation Centre, though constituting a welcome first step, falls short of requirements and of the level of ambition of a permanent OHQ and that it must instead be made permanent and put in a position to manage larger missions, that it must be granted adequate staff resources and operational infrastructure and that the unreliability of the EU's communications and information systems infrastructure must be dealt with, the main reason for which is that there is no permanent command and control (C2) structure (and relevant legal framework), a fact which can also adversely affect situational awareness; advocates co-location of the military OHQ with the civilian HQ, in order to allow the whole range of military and civilian operations to be carried out, exploiting potential synergistic effects to the full while respecting the distinctive civilian and military chains of command and the different decision-making procedures and financing arrangements;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica v svojem odzivu na weimarsko pobudo priznala potrebo po zmogljivosti za izvajanje vojaških operacij EU; vztraja, da bi morala analiza stroškovne učinkovitosti, ki jo je zahtevala podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica, vključiti tudi stroške, ki nastajajo zaradi tega, ker EU nima operativnega štaba; izraža svojo namero, da bo podprl študijo o zgornjem vprašanju ter o morebitnih stroških in dogovorih glede financiranja nove strukture;
Welcomes the fact that, in her reply to the Weimar initiative, the VP/HR recognised the need for an EU military conduct capability; maintains that the cost-efficiency analysis called for by the VP/HR should also factor in the costs arising because the EU has no OHQ; declares its intention of promoting a study on that point and on the possible cost of, and financing arrangements for, the new structure;
priznava ustreznost bojnih skupin, vendar poziva k resnemu premisleku glede koncepta in strukture teh skupin, ki do sedaj v praksi še niso delovale, v smislu povečanja prožnosti in učinkovitosti; meni, da:
Recognises the soundness of the Battlegroups, but calls for the concept and the structure of the Battlegroups, which have so far never been deployed, to be carefully reviewed for an increased degree of flexibility and efficiency; believes that
bi lahko premislili o tem, da bi se ena od obeh bojnih skupin specializirala za nišne zmogljivosti in/ali zmogljivosti, primerne za spopade nizke intenzivnosti, ki vključujejo civilno-vojaške naloge;
consideration could be given to specialising one of the two Battlegroups in niche capabilities and/or capabilities suited to low-intensity conflicts entailing mixed civilian-military tasks;
bi morali njihove operativne stroške knjižiti v breme mehanizma ATHENA, katerega pregled je predviden v času poljskega predsedovanja;
the operating costs should be charged to the ATHENA mechanism, which is due to be reviewed under the Polish Presidency;
poudarja, da Pogodba določa, naj se evropska politika zmogljivosti in oboroževanja določi v sodelovanju z Evropsko obrambno agencijo, ter institucije in telesa EU in države članice poziva, naj sodelujejo pri oblikovanju in izvajanju te politike;
Underlines the Treaty reference to a European capabilities and armaments policy to be defined with the participation of the EDA and calls for the cooperation of the EU institutions, bodies and Member States to this end in the framing and implementation of such a policy;
spodbuja k tesnemu sodelovanju med agencijo in Komisijo, da bi okrepili zmogljivosti za dvojno uporabo ter tako poiskali najbolj celosten pristop k raziskavam v zvezi z varnostjo in izboljšali sinergijsko upravljanje civilno-vojaških virov, zlasti prek varnostne teme znotraj okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj; zato pozdravlja pričakovani osmi okvirni program, ki bo zajemal tudi področje zunanje varnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj prizna, da je krizno upravljanje civilno-vojaške narave, ter razmisli o financiranju raziskav na področju varnosti in obrambe za civilno uporabo s sredstvi Skupnosti; vendar poudarja, da to sodelovanje ne sme preseči civilno-vojaškega sodelovanja, ki je potrebno za ohranjanje miru, preprečevanje sporov in krepitev mednarodne varnosti ter kriznega upravljanja;
Encourages close cooperation between the Agency and the Commission with a view to enhancing dual-use capabilities in order to find the most comprehensive approach to security-related research and to make for better synergic management of civilian-military resources, in particular through the security theme of the Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development; accordingly welcomes the prospect of the Eighth Framework Programme, which will also cover external security; and calls on the Commission to acknowledge the reality of the civil-military nature of crisis management and consider the financing of security and defence research which has civilian applications with Community funds; notes, however, that this cooperation should not exceed what is necessary with a view to civil-military cooperation in peace-keeping, conflict prevention and strengthening international security as well as crisis management activities;
poziva vodjo Evropske obrambne agencije (podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico) in Svet, naj pravočasno pripravita nov sklep Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropske obrambne agencije na podlagi nove vloge te agencije v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo; dvomi v sedanjo pravno podlago za Evropsko obrambno agencijo iz leta 2004 glede na Lizbonsko pogodbo in posledice te pogodbe v zvezi z Evropsko obrambno agencijo; poziva Svet, da obvesti Evropski parlament o spremembah Skupnega ukrepa Sveta o ustanovitvi Evropske obrambne agencije, ki so potrebne zaradi vključitve Evropske obrambne agencije v Lizbonsko pogodbo;
Urges the head of the EDA (HR/VP) as well as the Council to deliver in good time a new Council Decision on Establishing the EDA based on the EDA's new role as described in the Lisbon Treaty; questions the current legal basis of the EDA dating back to 2004 in view of the Lisbon Treaty and its implications for the EDA; calls on the Council to inform the European Parliament on the necessary changes to the Council Joint Action on Establishing the EDA resulting from the EDA's inclusion in the Lisbon Treaty;
poziva k vzpostavitvi močnega sodelovanja med Komisijo, Parlamentom, Evropsko obrambno agencijo in sodelujočimi državami članicami pri pripravah na osmi okvirni program s ciljem vlaganj na ravni EU v tehnološka področja, ki so v skupnem interesu, pri čemer je treba upoštevati tudi dejstvo, da izdatki za raziskave in razvoj na področju obrambe v Evropi trenutno znašajo okrog 10 % izdatkov, ki jih temu namenjajo ZDA;
Calls for the establishment of a strong partnership between the Commission, Parliament, the EDA and the participating Member States on the preparations for the Eighth Framework Programme with a view to investments in technology areas of common interest at EU level, bearing in mind not least that the amount spent in Europe on investment in defence-related R&D is currently equivalent to about 10% of the US figure;
45. poziva k tesnemu sodelovanju med Evropsko obrambno agencijo in Skupno organizacijo za sodelovanje na področju oboroževanja (OCCAR); zahteva, da ga vodja Evropske obrambne agencije (podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica) obvešča o rezultatih pogajanj o upravnem dogovoru o sodelovanju, ki so se začela aprila 2010; 46.
45 Calls for strong cooperation between the EDA and the Organisation Conjointe de Coopération en matière d'ARmement (OCCAR); requests information from the head of the EDA (HR/VP) on the results of the negotiations on an Administrative Arrangement for their cooperation which started in April 2009; 46.
ponovno poudarja, da je vzpostavitev bolj konkurenčnega in učinkovitega evropskega trga za varnost in obrambo, odprtega za javna naročila, skupaj z razširjeno evropsko obrambno tehnološko in industrijsko osnovo (EDTIB), ki upošteva ključne industrijske zmogljivosti, zanesljivost oskrbe med državami članicami, večjo konkurenco na trgu obrambne opreme, poglobljeno in raznoliko izbiro dobaviteljev in večje sodelovanje na področju oboroževanja, eden izmed temeljnih pogojev za avtonomno in verodostojno SVOP;
Reaffirms that one of the prerequisites for an autonomous and credible CSDP is the establishment of a more competitive and efficient European defence and security market open to public procurement, with an enhanced European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) that takes into account key industrial capabilities, security of supply between countries, a deepening and diversifying supplier base and increased armaments cooperation;
poudarja, da je za obrambni trg bistvenega pomena, da vse države članice v nacionalno zakonodajo prenesejo naslednje direktive:
Points out that it is essential, for the defence market, for the following directives to be transposed into national law by all Member States:
(do 30. junija 2011) Direktivo 2009/43/ES o prenosu obrambnih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti, in
(by 30 June 2011) Directive 2009/43/EC on transfer of defence-related products within the Community, and
(do 31. avgusta 2011) Direktivo 2009/81/ES o postopkih za oddajo naročil na področju obrambe in varnosti;
(by 31 August 2011) Directive 2009/81/EC on procedures for the award of contracts in the fields of defence and security;
priporoča državam članicam, naj pod vodstvom Komisije dosledno spoštujejo časovne roke in oblikujejo potrebne izvedbene predpise ter hkrati poskrbijo za pripravljenost osebja na izvajanje nove zakonodaje; poziva države članice, naj upoštevajo ustrezna navodila Komisije;
recommends that Member States comply strictly with the deadlines, under the Commission's supervision, and that they draw up the necessary implementing regulations and train the relevant staff to enforce the new rules; calls upon Member States to take the respective Guidance Notes issued by the Commission into account;
priporoča nujen pregled izvajanja Skupnega stališča Sveta, ki opredeljuje skupna pravila glede nadzora izvoza vojaške tehnologije in opreme, z dne 8. decembra 2008, da se zagotovi stroga in dosledna skladnost delovanja vseh nacionalnih organov, ki so vključeni v državah članicah;
Recommends that the implementation of the Common Position defining unified rules on the control of technology and military exports adopted on 8 December 2008 be urgently reviewed, in order to ensure strict and consistent compliance by all national authorities involved in each Member State;
poziva države članice, naj ravnajo v skladu s kodeksom ravnanja pri javnih naročilih za obrambo in kodeksom ravnanja za kompenzacije Evropske obrambne agencije, da se prepreči kršenje pravil notranjega trga in omejijo priložnosti za korupcijo;
Urges Member States to abide by the EDA's Code of Conduct on defence procurement and its Code of Conduct on offsets, so as to prevent violations of internal market rules and reduce opportunities for corruption;
poudarja, da je za krepitev porajajočega se evropskega trga za varnost in obrambo treba odpraviti praznino na področju predpisov in standardov, saj takšno stanje omejuje priložnosti za delovanje na trgu tako velikim kot tudi malim in srednjim podjetjem in preprečuje interoperabilnost varnostnih sistemov; v celoti podpira delo Evropske obrambne agencije v okviru nove pravne podlage, ki jo zagotavlja Lizbonska pogodba; zagovarja tesno sodelovanje med Evropsko obrambno agencijo in Komisijo, da se vzpostavi evropski obrambni trg; poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z Evropsko obrambno agencijo spodbudi prvi razmislek o evropski industrijski politiki na področju varnosti in obrambe;
Underlines that, in order to foster the emerging European security and defence market, a remedy needs to be found for the vacuum in terms of regulations and standards, since this situation limits market opportunities for both large players and SMEs and prevents interoperability among security systems; fully supports the work of the EDA in the framework of the new legal basis provided by the Lisbon Treaty; advocates close collaboration between the EDA and the Commission to create a European defence market; calls for the Commission to launch, in cooperation with the EDA, a first reflection on an European industrial policy in the field of security and defence;
poziva sodelujoče države članice, naj sodelovanje v Evropski obrambni agenciji obravnavajo kot stalno zavezo in ji zagotovijo potrebne človeške in ekonomske vire; poziva k povišanju izdatkov, namenjenih operativnim projektom in študijam (ki so povprečno predstavljali približno 25 % proračuna), če bi se, žal, glasovanje z vetom glede povečanja proračuna še naprej nadaljevalo;
Urges the participating Member States to regard their participation in the EDA as a permanent commitment and to provide the Agency with the necessary human and economic resources; calls for the expenditure earmarked for operational projects and studies (which has hitherto accounted – on average – for about 25% of the budget) to be raised in the unwelcome event that vetoes on budget increases were to continue for a lengthy period;
meni, da je treba v EU sprejeti regulativne ukrepe, vključno s celovitim normativnim sistemom za ustanovitev, registracijo, licenciranje, spremljanje in poročanje o kršitvah veljavne zakonodaje s strani zasebnih vojaških družb in zasebnih varnostnih služb na notranji in zunanji ravni;
Considers that the adoption of EU regulatory measures, including a comprehensive normative system for the establishment, registration, licensing, monitoring and reporting on violations of applicable law by private military and security (PMS) companies - both at internal and external level –, is necessary;
zato poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj ustrezno ukrepata:
Calls therefore on the Commission and the Council to initiate appropriate actions:
na notranji ravni s pripravo priporočila, ki omogoča sprejetje direktive za usklajevanje nacionalnih ukrepov za reguliranje storitev zasebnih vojaških družb in zasebnih varnostnih služb, tudi glede ponudnikov storitev in naročanja storitev;
for the internal level, the drafting of a Recommendation paving the way for a Directive aimed at harmonising national measures regulating PMSC services, including service providers and the procurement of services;
na zunanji ravni s pripravo kodeksa ravnanja, ki omogoča sprejetje sklepa o reguliranju izvoza storitev zasebnih vojaških družb in zasebnih varnostnih služb v tretje države, kolikor ni reguliran v zgoraj omenjeni direktivi;
for the external level, the drafting of a Code of Conduct paving the way for a Decision regulating the export of PMSC services to third states to the extent not covered by the above-mentioned Directive;
meni, da je treba notranjo in zunanjo varnost v EU obravnavati kot dopolnjujoči se razsežnosti iste strategije, kot Evropski svet jasno poudarja vse od srečanj v Tampereju (1999), Feiri (2000) in Stockholmu (2010), ko je sprejel cilje v zvezi z evropskim območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice za obdobje 2010–2014; poudarja, da se v okviru boja proti mednarodnemu terorizmu ni mogoče nikakor pogajati o ključnih vrednotah in standardih, kot so človekove pravice, temeljne svoboščine in humanitarno pravo, ter da je začasni odbor Evropskega parlamenta za preučitev domnev o uporabi evropskih držav za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje ujetnikov s strani ameriške obveščevalne agencije CIA med drugim sklenil, da je treba zagotoviti obsežnejši parlamentarni nadzor nad politikami in ukrepi za boj proti terorizmu v državah članicah in v EU;
Considers that the internal and external aspects of EU security should be treated as complementary dimensions of the same strategy, as the European Council has made clear since its meetings in Tampere (1999), Feira (2000) and Stockholm (2010), when it adopted the European freedom, security, and justice area objectives for the period 2010-2014; stresses that under no circumstances are core values and norms such as human rights, fundamental rights and freedoms and humanitarian law negotiable in the context of the fight against international terrorism and that one of the conclusions of the European Parliament's Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners is that national and EU anti-terrorism policies and measures need more parliamentary oversight;
meni, da v sodobnem času, še zlasti pa po 11. septembru, postaja vse bolj jasno, da številnih čezmejnih dejavnosti, kot so terorizem, širjenje orožja za množično uničevanje, organizirani kriminal, kibernetski kriminal, mamila in trgovina z ljudmi, ni mogoče obravnavati brez usklajenega delovanja, ki vključuje ’zunanje’ varnostne politike ter ’notranje’ zakonske in politične ukrepe in orodja, ki sta jih izpostavila že prvi akcijski načrt Evropske Unije za boj proti terorizmu (2001) in strategija Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu (2005); opozarja, da Svet v poročilu o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije iz leta 2008 poudarja, da neuspeh države vpliva na varnost Evrope, kot je razvidno iz primera Somalije;
Considers that it has become increasingly clear in modern times, and especially since September 11, that many transnational threats such as terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, organised crime, cybercrime, drugs and trafficking in human beings cannot be addressed without coordinated action involving ’external’ security policies and ’internal’ legislative and political measures and tools, as already highlighted in the first European Union Anti-Terrorism Action Plan (2001) and the European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy (2005); recalls that the 2008 Council implementation report on the European Security Strategy points out that State failure affects European security, as the Somalia case illustrates;
priznava, da postajajo povezave med zunanjimi in notranjimi varnostnimi politikami vedno bolj očitne tako v državah članicah kot tudi v tretjih državah, na primer v ZDA, kjer so leta 2003 z združitvijo 22 zveznih agencij ustanovili Ministrstvo za domovinsko varnost, ki sedaj zaposluje več kot 200 000 uradnikov in katerega proračun znaša več kot 40 milijard USD letno; meni, da ni presenetljivo, da so glavne naloge ministrstva za domovinsko varnost deloma enake tistim, ki jih je Evropska unija povezala z ustanovitvijo območja svobode, varnosti in pravice (varovanje zunanjih meja, migracije, boj proti terorizmu);
Acknowledges that the connections between external and internal security policies have become more and more apparent in the Member States and notably in third countries such as the US, where the Department of Homeland Security, established in 2003 by the merger of 22 federal agencies, now employs more than 200 000 officials and has an annual budget of more than USD 40 billion; considers it to be no surprise that the main missions of the DHS are to some extent the same as those which the European Union has linked to the creation of the area of freedom, security, and justice (protection of external borders, migration, anti-terrorism);
pozdravlja dejstvo, da ključne določbe Lizbonske pogodbe odražajo prilagoditev zgoraj omenjenega stanja in potrebo po izkoriščanju sinergij med zunanjo in notranjo varnostjo, vključno z:
Welcomes the fact that key provisions of the Lisbon Treaty reflect the adaptation to the abovementioned context and the need to exploit the synergies between external and internal security, including the following:
razširitvijo pristojnosti SVOP z obsežnejšimi misijami, ki sodijo v okvir petersberških nalog in bi lahko prispevale k boju proti terorizmu, med drugim tudi z nudenjem podpore tretjim državam za boj proti terorizmu na njihovem ozemlju; priporoča široko razlago teh določb v skladu z ustreznimi resolucijami Združenih narodov in ob popolnem spoštovanju človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin; vendar opozarja, da vojaško odzivanje samo po sebi ni dovolj za to, da bi porazili mednarodni terorizem, in poziva h krepitvi mednarodnih prizadevanj za opredelitev upravičenih skrbi v zvezi s tem pojavom in za soočanje z njimi, pri čemer je treba hkrati izboljšati dialog in širše razumevanje med civilizacijami;
expansion of the CSDP to include wider Petersberg-type missions that could contribute to counterterrorism, not least through support to help third countries fight terrorism on their territory; recommends that these provisions be interpreted in sweeping terms in line with the relevant UN resolutions and with full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; recalls, however, that a military response it is not by itself enough to defeat international terrorism and calls for sustained international efforts to identify and deal with legitimate grievances behind the phenomenon, enhancing, at the same time, dialogue and broadening understanding among civilisations;
solidarnostno klavzulo: Parlament se strinja, da mora ta mehanizem postati operativen, in pozdravlja dejstvo, da sta Komisija in podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica obljubili, da bosta leta 2011 pripravili medsektorski predlog, ki bo zagotovil podlago za skupno zavezo EU o uporabi solidarnostne klavzule v praksi;
solidarity clause: agrees that this mechanism must be made operative and welcomes the fact that the Commission and the VP/HR have pledged to submit a cross-cutting proposal in 2011 in order to provide the basis for the EU's collective commitment to put the solidarity clause into practice;