natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi morale biti ključne sestavine prostovoljske službe opredelitev in izbira prostovoljcev ter njihovo usposabljanje in razmestitev;
Considers that the key components of the Voluntary Service should be the identification and selection of volunteers and their training and deployment;
poudarja, da mora prostovoljska služba temeljiti na povpraševanju in potrebah in da mora biti varnost izredno pomembna;
Emphasises that the Voluntary Service should be demand-driven and needs-based and that security must be of paramount importance;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to izjavo skupaj z imeni podpisnikov Seznam podpisnikov je objavljen v Prilogi 1 k zapisniku z dne 29. septembra 2011 ( P7_PV-PROV(2011)09-29(ANN1) ).
Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories The list of signatories is published in Annex 1 to the Minutes of 29 September 2011 ( P7_PV-PROV(2011)09-29(ANN1) ).
ob upoštevanju stockholmskega programa, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel decembra 2009,
having regard to the Stockholm Programme adopted by the European Council in December 2009,
ker Evropska unija že dolgo spodbuja mednarodni mir in preprečevanje uporabe zemeljskih min,
whereas the European Union has long been a promoter of international peace and of prevention of landmine use,
ker se civilni invalidi vojn, žrtve zemeljskih min in drugih ostankov orožja ter žrtve terorizma v državah članicah in državah kandidatkah stalno soočajo z zdravstvenimi in socialno-ekonomskimi težavami, ki jih je treba obravnavati na celovit in usklajen način,
whereas civilian invalids of war, victims of land mines and other leftover weaponry and victims of terrorism in the Member States and in candidate countries face ongoing health and socio-economic difficulties which need to be addressed in a comprehensive, coordinated manner,
meni, da bi morala Evropa priznati in obravnavati dolgoročne potrebe žrtev terorističnih napadov in civilnih invalidov vojn in jim podeliti poseben status ter tako biti za zgled preostalemu svetu;
Considers that Europe should set an example for the rest of the world by recognising and addressing the long-term needs of the victims of terrorist attacks and of civilian invalids of war and giving them a special status;
poziva Komisijo, naj ustrezno ukrepa, da zagotovi nediskriminacijsko upoštevanje stalnih zdravstvenih in družbenih potreb civilnih invalidov vojn in žrtev terorizma v EU, ter tako pomaga tem ljudem, da dostojno živijo v domačem okolju;
Calls on the Commission to take appropriate steps to ensure that the ongoing medical and societal needs of civilian invalids of war and victims of terrorism are met without discrimination in the EU, with the aim of helping such persons to lead a dignified life in their own environment;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to izjavo skupaj z imeni podpisnikov Seznam podpisnikov je objavljen v Prilogi 2 k zapisniku z dne 29. septembra 2011 ( P7_PV-PROV(2011)09-29(ANN2) ).
Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories The list of signatories is published in Annex 2 to the Minutes of 29 September 2011 ( P7_PV-PROV(2011)09-29(ANN2) ).
posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in parlamentom držav članic.
, to the Council and Commission and to the parliaments of the Member States.
ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (09114/2011),
having regard to the draft Council decision (09114/2011),
ob upoštevanju osnutka Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo ter Republiko Zelenortski otoki o nekaterih vidikih zračnih prevozov (16459/2010 + COR1 + COR2),
having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde on certain aspects of air services (16459/2010 + COR1 + COR2),
ob upoštevanju prošnje za odobritev, ki jo je Svet podal v skladu s členom 100(2), točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) ter prvim pododstavkom člena 218(8) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0123/2011 ),
having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 100(2), Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and 218(8), first subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0123/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7-0307/2011 ),
having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0307/2011 ),
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in Republike Zelenortski otoki.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Cape Verde.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. oktobra 2011 o zavarovalnih jamstvenih shemah ( 2011/2010(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 13 October 2011 on Insurance Guarantee Schemes ( 2011/2010(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 12. julija 2010 z naslovom Bela knjiga o zavarovalnih jamstvenih shemah ( KOM(2010)0370 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 12 July 2010, entitled ‘White Paper on Insurance Guarantee Schemes’ ( COM(2010)0370 ),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/138/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II) UL L 335, 17.12.2009, str.
having regard to Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) OJ L 335, 17.12.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (EU) št. 1094/2010 z dne 24. novembra 2010 o ustanovitvi Evropskega nadzornega organa (Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine) UL L 331, 15.12.2010, str.
having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju končnega poročila z dne 23. maja 2007 svojega preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe „Equitable Life Assurance Society“ ( A6-0203/2007 ),
having regard to the final report of 23 May 2007 of its Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society ( A6-0203/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za pravne zadeve in Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0243/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0243/2011 ),
ker je finančna kriza pokazala, da je zaupanje potrošnikov v finančni sistem hitro omajano, če ni ustreznih odškodninskih postopkov v zvezi z njihovimi izgubami, do katerih pride zaradi propada finančne institucije,
whereas the financial crisis has demonstrated that consumer confidence in the financial system can be quickly undermined in the absence of adequate compensation processes for consumer losses incurred as a result of the failure of financial institutions,
ker so lahko zavarovalne jamstvene sheme dragoceno orodje za zmanjšanje tveganj, s katerimi se imetniki zavarovalnih polic ali, kjer je to ustrezno, upravičenci soočijo v primeru propada zavarovalne družbe,
whereas Insurance Guarantee Schemes (IGSs) can be a valuable tool in reducing the risks facing policy-holders or, where appropriate, beneficiaries in the event of the failure of an insurance entity,
ker potreba po zavarovalnih jamstvenih shemah, njihova funkcija in struktura niso v skladu niti s sistemi zajamčenih vlog niti z odškodninskimi shemami za vlagatelje, in sicer zaradi različnih poslovnih modelov zavarovateljev in ker so potrošniki v primeru zavarovateljevega propada izpostavljeni tveganju v različnem obsegu,
whereas the necessity, function and structure of IGSs are not analogous with those of either deposit guarantee schemes or investor compensation schemes, on account of the different business model used by insurers and the different degree to which consumers are exposed to risk in the event of the failure of an insurer,
ker v državah članicah obstaja veliko število zavarovalnih jamstvenih shem, ki omogočajo različno raven varstva potrošnikov na podlagi različnih vrst produktov in različnih modelov financiranja,
whereas a wide range of IGSs exist in the Member States, offering varying degrees of consumer protection across various product lines on the basis of various funding models,
ker pri imetnikih zavarovalnih polic ali, kjer je to ustrezno, upravičencih ni opaznejših izgub zaradi finančne krize, evropska zavarovalna panoga pa je krizo prestala razmeroma nepoškodovana,
whereas there have been no notable insurance policy-holder or, where appropriate, beneficiary losses as a result of the financial crisis, and whereas the European insurance industry has emerged from the crisis comparatively unscathed,
ker uvaja direktiva Solventnost II lestvico nadzornih intervencij, ki naj bi kar se da zmanjšale možnost, da bi šel zavarovatelj v stečaj, zaradi česar bi bili imetniki zavarovalnih polic ali, kjer je to ustrezno, upravičenci oškodovani,
whereas Solvency II introduces a ladder of supervisory intervention minimising the likelihood of an insurer going bankrupt and the disruption to policyholders or, where appropriate, beneficiaries resulting from such an event,
ker bo uvedba direktive Solventnost II in zavarovalnih jamstvenih shem prispevala k vzpostavitvi enakih konkurenčnih pogojev na evropskem zavarovalnem trgu in pripomogla, da se vzpostavi notranji trg,
whereas the introduction of Solvency II and IGSs will contribute to the establishment of a level playing field on the European insurance market and help to bring about the completion of the internal market,
ker so po direktivi Solventnost II terjatve imetnikov polic ali, kjer je to ustrezno, upravičencev varne, če zavarovatelj začne postopek nesolventnosti (če prekrši zahtevani solventnostni kapital), ogrožene pa so samo, če gre zavarovatelj v stečaj (če nima dovolj premoženja za pokritje svojih obveznosti),
whereas under Solvency II policy-holder or, where appropriate, beneficiary claims are secure when an insurer enters into insolvency (when the insurer breaches its Solvency Capital Requirement), and only become at risk if the insurer goes bankrupt (when its assets are insufficient to cover its liabilities),
ker je čezmejnega zagotavljanja zavarovanj v EU malo, zaradi uvedbe direktive Solventnost II pa bi utegnilo porasti, saj ta z vseevropsko strukturo podružnic omogoča kapitalske ugodnosti,
whereas cross-border provision of insurance in the EU is low but likely to grow as a result of the introduction of Solvency II, owing to the capital benefits offered by a branch-based pan-European structure,
ker pomanjkanje usklajenih ureditev za zavarovalne jamstvene sheme na evropski ravni in raznoliki režimi v državah članicah povzročajo neučinkovito in neenako varstvo imetnikov zavarovalnih polic ter z izkrivljanjem čezmejne konkurence upočasnjujejo delovanje zavarovalniškega trga,
whereas the lack of harmonised IGSs at European level and the diversity of regimes in Member States have led to ineffective and uneven protection for insurance policy-holders and have slowed down the functioning of the insurance market by distorting cross-border competition,
ker lahko zaupanje potrošnikov v delovanje notranjega trga finančnih storitev zagotovimo samo z dosledno ravnjo varstva potrošnikov, ne glede na izvor ponudnika storitev, in sicer predvsem s skladno uporabo trdnih bonitetnih pravil in z učinkovitim nadzorom, ki ga izvajajo Evropski nadzorni organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine (organ EIOPA) ter, kjer je to ustrezno, pristojni nacionalni organi,
whereas consumer trust in the functioning of the internal market in financial services can only be assured by a consistent level of consumer protection regardless of the origin of the service provider, primarily through the consistent application of sound prudential rules and effective supervision by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and, where appropriate, national competent authorities,
ker je treba nevarnost, da bi propad finančnih institucij ogrozil davkoplačevalce, z učinkovitim in sorazmernim pregledom nad nacionalnimi in evropskimi nadzorniki obdržati na čim nižji ravni,
whereas taxpayers' exposure to the failure of financial institutions must be kept at a minimum through effective and proportionate oversight by national and European supervisors,
priznava, da bosta prihodnji nadzorni režim in prihajajoči okvir Solventnost II še okrepila varstvo potrošnikov;
Recognises that the new supervisory regime and the forthcoming Solvency II framework will further enhance consumer protection;
poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s pravili in opredelitvami, določenimi v direktivi Solventnost II in novem nadzornem okviru, predstavi predloge direktive o čezmejni standardizaciji, ki bi določila povezan in dosleden čezmejni okvir za zavarovalne jamstvene sheme v vseh državah članicah, ki bi zagotavljala potrošnikom samo zadnjo možnost zaščite, ko zavarovalnice niso sposobne izpolniti svojih pogodbenih obveznosti zaradi nesolventnosti;
Calls on the Commission, with regard to the rules and definitions set out in Solvency II and the new supervisory framework, to come forward with proposals for a cross-border standardisation directive establishing a coherent and consistent cross-border framework for IGSs across Member States, providing only last-resort protection to consumers when insurance undertakings are unable to fulfil their contractual commitments owing to insolvency;
poziva Komisijo, naj hitro predstavi predlog direktive o zavarovalnih jamstvenih shemah, ki bo dopolnila direktive o sistemih zajamčenih vlog, o odškodninskih shemah za vlagatelje in Solventnost II;
Calls on the Commission rapidly to put forward the proposal for a directive on Insurance Guarantee Schemes to complement Deposit Guarantee Schemes, Investor Compensation Schemes and Solvency II;
priznava, da bi možnosti za neenake konkurenčne pogoje lahko povzročile regulativno arbitražo, ki bi vplivala na zavarovalne jamstvene sheme; poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda medsebojno učinkovanje med usklajevanjem in izvajanjem shem iz vse EU ter načelom matične države, da pojasni, ali gre za pomembno izkrivljanje trga ali ne; meni, da bi ta pregled lahko izvedli tri leta po celovitem izvajanju direktive Solventnost II;
Acknowledges that the potential for an uneven playing field could cause regulatory arbitrage, which would affect IGSs; calls on the Commission to examine the interplay between harmonisation and the application of schemes from across the EU and the home state principle to clarify whether or not a significant distortion of the market occurs; considers that this review should be conducted three years after the full implementation of Solvency II;
se strinja, da direktiva Solventnost II ne vzpostavlja okolja, v katerem bi bila možnost propada zavarovalnic popolnoma izključena, in ne varuje potrošnikov pred izgubami, če do propada pride; zato poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo skupna zavarovalna jamstvena shema, ki jo je treba sprejeti, dosledna in skladna z direktivo Solventnost II;
Agrees that the Solvency II Directive does not create a zero-failure environment for insurance companies and does not protect consumer losses in the event of the failure of insurance undertakings; calls, therefore, on the Commission to ensure that the common IGS to be adopted is consistent and coherent with the Solvency II Directive;
podpira sprejetje načela matične države, po katerem za zavarovanja, sklenjena z zavarovateljem, ne glede na mesto prodaje velja matična zavarovalna jamstvena shema, in priznava, da (a) bo po direktivi Solventnost II čezmejno zagotavljanje zavarovalnih storitev naraslo, in (b) da bo propad zavarovatelja povezan z neustreznostjo nadzora, zato bi morala breme odgovornosti za propad kriti pristojna matična zavarovalna jamstvena shema, ki bi zagotavljala potrošnikom samo varstvo v skrajni sili, ko zavarovalnice zaradi nesolventnosti niso sposobne izpolniti svojih pogodbenih obveznosti; poziva Komisijo, naj izvede oceno vpliva in javno posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi o vključitvi življenjskega zavarovanja kot prednostne zadeve in praktičnosti vključitve neživljenjskega zavarovanja v čezmejne zavarovalne jamstvene sheme, da se zagotovijo primerna raven varstva potrošnikov in enaki konkurenčni pogoji med državami članicami; meni, da bi Komisija in organ EIOPA morala opredeliti temeljno načelo, da bi zagotovila, da se pri tehtanju cilja varstva potrošnikov upoštevajo dodatni stroški za zavarovalno jamstveno shemo; ugotavlja, da sedanja pravna ureditev EU za sisteme zajamčenih vlog in sheme za zaščito vlagateljev krije samo varčevalne produkte;
Supports the adoption of the ‘home’ country principle – whereby policies written by an insurer, regardless of location of sale, are covered by the ‘home’ IGS – recognising (a) that under Solvency II the cross-border provision of insurance services will increase, and (b) that the failure of an insurer will be linked to the inadequacy of supervision by the ‘home’ supervisor, so that the burden of responsibility for failure should be borne by the ‘home’ IGS, which should provide last-resort protection to consumers only when insurance undertakings are unable to fulfil their contractual commitments owing to insolvency; calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment and public consultation with stakeholders on the inclusion of life insurance as a matter of priority and on the practicality of including non-life insurance in a cross-border IGS to ensure an appropriate level of consumer protection and a level playing field between Member States; believes that a rationale should be established by the Commission and the EIOPA in order to ensure that the additional costs of an IGS are weighed against the objective of consumer protection; notes that the current EU regulation on deposit guarantee schemes and investor protection schemes covers only savings products;
vztraja, da mora načelo subsidiarnosti pokrivati model financiranja nacionalne zavarovalne jamstvene sheme, tako da bo odražal načelo nadzora v matični državi in raznolikost modelov, ki jih uporabljajo obstoječe zavarovalne jamstvene sheme; poziva Komisijo, naj ne zagovarja izključno pristopa s financiranjem vnaprej, saj ni dokazov, ki bi ga zatrdno podpirali, ali o motnjah, ki bi jih lahko povzročil;
Insists that the funding model for national IGSs should be covered by the subsidiarity principle, reflecting the ‘home’ country principle of supervision and the diversity of models used by existing IGSs; urges the Commission not to advocate a uniquely ex-ante approach to funding, given the absence of compelling arguments in favour of such an approach and the disruption it could cause;
vztraja, da bi morale države članice zagotoviti, da se opravijo preskusi njihovih zavarovalnih jamstvenih shem in da so obveščene v primeru, da pristojni organi ugotovijo težave v zavarovalnici, ki bi lahko terjale posredovanje po zadevni shemi; predlaga, da bi taki preskusi potekali vsaj vsake tri leta ali kadar to zahtevajo okoliščine; meni tudi, da bi moral organ EIOPA redno opravljati medsebojne strokovne preglede, s katerimi bi preveril dolgoročno finančno vzdržnost shem, in pozvati k izboljšanju vedno, ko je to potrebno;
Insists that Member States should ensure that tests are carried out on their IGSs and that they are informed should the competent authorities detect problems in an insurance company that are likely to give rise to intervention under the relevant scheme; suggests that such tests should take place at least every three years, or when circumstances so require; considers, further, that the EIOPA should periodically conduct peer reviews to examine the long-term financial sustainability of schemes and call for improvements wherever necessary;
priznava, da bi uveljavljanje načela subsidiarnosti pri izbiri modelov vnaprejšnjega ali naknadnega financiranja lahko privedla do konkurenčnih izkrivljenj med državami članicami; meni, da imajo tovrstne motnje enak vpliv na varstvo potrošnikov in davkoplačevalcev ter da bi morala Komisija k obravnavanju tovrstnih motenj pristopiti previdno in dolgoročno;
Acknowledges that the application of the subsidiarity principle in relation to the choice of ex-ante or ex-post funding models may result in competitive distortions between Member States; believes that such distortions have an equal bearing on both consumer and taxpayer protection and that the Commission should take a cautious, long-term approach to addressing such distortions;
priznava, da so načini zagotavljanja varstva potrošnikov različni:
Recognises that there are different ways of ensuring consumer protection:
odškodnina: izgube, ki jih utrpijo imetniki polic ali upravičenci v primeru nesolventnosti zavarovatelja, se neposredno nadomestijo z rednim postopkom reševanja odškodninskih zahtevkov;
compensation: losses faced by policy-holders or beneficiaries in the event of the insolvency of an insurer are directly compensated following an orderly claims-settlement process;
neprekinjenost: neprekinjenost zavarovalnih pogodb se zagotovi s prenosom portfelja na preostale zavarovatelje na trgu ali na poseben subjekt, ustanovljen v ta namen;
continuity: the continuity of insurance contracts is secured through portfolio transfers to the remaining insurers in the market or to a special entity created for this purpose;
vztraja, da bi morale biti informacije, ki so na voljo potrošnikom v primeru zavarovateljeve nesolventnosti, lahko dostopne, celovite in enostavne, z jasno navedbo, na koga se potrošniki lahko obrnejo za vložitev zahtevkov ali poizvedb; je prepričan, da bi z vzpostavitvijo enotne kontaktne točke za vse finančne jamstvene ali odškodninske sheme zagotovili, da bo veljavna zakonodaja potrošnikom res koristila, zlasti v zvezi z dajanjem informacij in omogočanjem čezmejnih stikov in plačil;
Insists that the information available to consumers in the event of an insurer's insolvency should be easily accessible, comprehensive and easy to follow, with clear indications as to which authority the consumer should approach when making claims or enquiries; is convinced that setting up a single point of contact for all financial guarantee or compensation schemes would ensure that the existing legislation genuinely benefited consumers, especially as regards the provision of information and the facilitation of cross-border contact and payments;
poudarja, da je lahko pristop matične države do zavarovalnih jamstvenih shem s potrošnikovega vidika verodostojen samo, če so izkušnje potrošnikov bolj ali manj enake za oba načina delovanja zavarovalnih jamstvenih shem (prenos portfelja in odškodnine za imetnike polic); Komisijo poziva, naj določi enotni postopek v domačem jeziku ter kontaktno točko za potrošnike pri njihovem nacionalnem nadzorniku za vse zavarovalne odškodninske terjatve, ne glede na sedež matične zavarovalne jamstvene sheme; priporoča, naj organ EIOPA oblikuje usklajen in pregleden pristop, ki bo preprost in bo temeljil na najboljši praksi, po potrebi naj to napravi z zavezujočimi tehničnimi standardi;
Stresses that the ‘home’ country approach to IGSs can only be credible from a consumer perspective if there is consistency of consumer experience for both IGS functions (portfolio transfer and policy-holder compensation claims); calls on the Commission to stipulate a single own-language process and point of contact for consumers within their national supervisor for all insurance-guarantee compensation claims, regardless of the location of the ‘home’ IGS; recommends that EIOPA develop a harmonised and transparent approach based on simplicity and best practice, and, where necessary, through binding technical standards;