natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je Odbor za peticije prejel več peticij – zlasti tisto, ki je privedla do misije za ugotavljanje dejstev v kraju Path Head (Združeno kraljestvo) – glede odlagališč, ki se nahajajo v neposredni bližini hiš in kjer prebivalstvo trpi zaradi škodljivega smradu, povečane onesnaženosti zraka in razmnoževanja škodljivcev v bližini njihovih hiš; ker pa zakonodaja EU ne predpisuje natančnejših meril glede oddaljenosti odlagališč od domov, šol in bolnišnic, je treba za opredelitev natančnih zahtev, ki bi zagotovile varovanje zdravja ljudi in okolja, upoštevati načelo subsidiarnosti, navedeno v pogodbah;
whereas the Committee on Petitions has received several petitions – notably the one which gave rise to the fact-finding mission to Path Head (UK) – which concerned landfills in close proximity to the nearest houses and where the population suffers noxious odours, increased air pollution and propagation of vermin close to their houses; whereas, however, as more precise criteria concerning the proximity of landfill sites to homes, schools and hospitals have not been laid down in EU law, the definition of the precise requirements to ensure the protection of human health and the environment are subject to the subsidiarity principle enshrined in the Treaties;
ker so v peticijah o odlagališčih pogosto izražene skrbi, ki se nanašajo na možnost onesnaženja podtalnice, saj starejša odlagališča morda nimajo tesnilne plasti, ki bi preprečevala pronicanje v vodonosnike, ali pa se tesnilne plasti zdijo poškodovane in vzbujajo sum na pronicanje ali pa so odlagališča na geološko nestabilnem terenu in preblizu podtalnici/zalogam pitne vode;
whereas petitions on landfills have frequently expressed concerns related to possible groundwater pollution, because older landfills may not have a liner preventing seepage into aquifers or the liners may look torn and create the suspicion of seepage or be on geologically unstable ground and too close to groundwater/drinking water reserves;
ker Komisija poroča, da je od leta 2001 sprožila 177 postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev direktive o odlagališčih in da je v nedavnem pregledu ugotovila, da v celotni EU obstaja najmanj 619 nezakonitih odlagališč;
whereas the Commission reports that 177 infringements of the Landfill Directive have been initiated since 2001 and that a recent inventory identified a minimum of 619 illegal landfills across the EU;
ker peticije in pritožbe, predložene pri Komisiji, dokazujejo obstoj velikega števila nezakonitih odlagališč, ki obratujejo brez dovoljenj, čeprav natančnega števila ni mogoče določiti zaradi pomanjkanja ustreznega spremljanja;
whereas petitions and complaints to the Commission testify to the presence of a large number of illegal landfills operating without permits, though the exact number is unknown for lack of adequate monitoring;
ker je treba opozoriti, da bi moralo biti odlaganje odpadkov na odlagališčih zadnja možnost; ker se javni organi v nekaterih državah članicah, ki zaostajajo pri preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov, njihovega recikliranja in ponovne uporabe, lahko znajdejo pod pritiskom, naj za potrebe odstranjevanja odpadkov kratkoročno razširijo obstoječa – tudi neustrezna – ali odprejo nova odlagališča;
whereas it is recalled that landfilling should be a solution of last resort; whereas public authorities in some Member States which have fallen behind with waste prevention, recycling and reuse may be under pressure to expand existing – even non-compliant – landfills or open new ones in the short term as a method for eliminating refuse;
ker je uporaba sežigalnic, ki se uvršča nizko v hierarhiji ravnanja z odpadki, uveljavljena in dobro sprejeta s strani državljanov v nekaterih državah, za katere se zdi, da so dosegle visoko raven skladnosti z okvirno direktivo o odpadkih, in ki v okviru tega postopka pridobivajo energijo; ker bi se v državah, ki še ne uporabljajo sežiganja odpadkov, lahko odločili zanj, da bi odpravili zaostanek glede nakopičenih odpadkov;
whereas the use of incinerators, which is low in the waste hierarchy, is well established and accepted by citizens in some countries considered to have reached a high level of compliance with the WFD and which recover energy in the process, and whereas countries which so far have not resorted to incineration may choose to do so in order to deal with accumulated backlogs;
ker se to lahko zgodi le pod pogojem, da se zagotovi strog nadzor in spoštovanje ustrezne zakonodaje EU, in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da lahko takšni ukrepi sprožijo razumljiv odpor najbolj neposredno prizadetih državljanov v bližini, ki jih skrbijo vplivi na njihovo zdravje;
whereas this can only be done on condition of strict control and respect for the relevant EU legislation and bearing in mind that such measures are likely to provoke understandable resistance from the most immediately affected populations in the vicinity, who are concerned about effects on their health;
ker je treba priznati, da so se z novejšimi tehnologijami izpusti iz sežigalnic občutno zmanjšali; ker se v nekaterih državah članicah – zlasti v tistih z visokimi stopnjami sežiganja odpadkov – zdi, da lokalno prebivalstvo to tehnologijo sprejema v večji meri, morda zaradi zavesti o proizvedeni toploti ali električni energiji v sežigalnicah, pa tudi zaradi preglednosti in dostopnosti informacij o njihovem delovanju;
whereas it should be acknowledged that more recent technology has reduced emissions from incinerators significantly; whereas in certain Member States – in particular those with high levels of waste incineration – local populations seem to show a higher level of acceptance, perhaps in recognition of the production of heat or power by incinerators, and also because of the transparency and accessibility of information on their functioning;
ker so dovoljenja za odprtje sežigalnic sprejeta s podobnim odporom kot za odlagališča – in sicer iz istih razlogov –, pri čemer je poudarjen strah pred onesnaženjem zraka in negativni vplivi na javno zdravje in/ali okoljsko zaščitena območja;
whereas permits for the establishment of incinerators meet with similar resistance, for similar reasons, to landfills, with the emphasis on fears of air pollution and negative impact on public health and/or environmentally protected zones;
ker javni organi za odprtje sežigalnic pogosto izberejo območja, ki že trpijo zaradi močne onesnaženosti zraka, ker ne bi smeli prezreti kumulativnih učinkov za zdravje prebivalcev območja in ker se iskanje drugih načinov odstranjevanja odpadkov in proizvodnje energije z metanizacijo pogosto zanemari;
whereas public authorities often choose areas already suffering from heavy air pollution for the establishment of incinerators, cumulative effects on the health of the inhabitants of the area should not be ignored and exploration of alternative methods of disposal of waste and production of energy through methanisation is often neglected;
ker osredotočanje na sežiganje odpadkov za proizvodnjo energije kot prva izbira kljub temu predstavlja način ravnanja z odpadki, ki je bolj potraten od preprečevanja, recikliranja in ponovne uporabe odpadkov, in je zato slednjim treba dati prednost, skladno s hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki iz okvirne direktive o odpadkih;
whereas a focus on incineration for energy production as a first choice nevertheless represents a more wasteful method of waste management than prevention, recycling and reuse, which is why these should be given priority, in accordance with the waste hierarchy of the WFD;
ker so za izpolnitev zakonsko določenih ciljev recikliranja in preprečevanja potrebni aktivno sodelovanje civilne družbe, izboljšano sodelovanje zainteresiranih strani in večja ozaveščenost javnosti, ki jih je treba doseči z medijskimi kampanjami za povečanje ozaveščenosti javnosti;
whereas what is required in order to meet legally established recycling and prevention targets is the active participation of civil society, improved stakeholder participation and increased public awareness, to be achieved through media campaigns to raise public awareness;
ker vsa poročila misij za ugotavljanje dejstev Odbora za peticije o vprašanjih odpadkov omenjajo slabo ali neobstoječo komunikacijo med državljani in organi, kar lahko v nekaterih primerih privede do napetih situacij in tudi do demonstracij državljanov, kot pogosto poročajo v medijih;
whereas all the reports on fact-finding missions of the Committee on Petitions on waste issues mention the poor or non-existent communication between citizens and authorities, which in some cases can lead to tense situations arising and also demonstrations by citizens, as often reported in the press;
ker svetovno prebivalstvo narašča, zaradi česar je moč pričakovati, da se bo skupna poraba bistveno povečala, kar še povečuje pritisk na ravnanje z odpadki; ker bi reševanje teh težav med drugim zahtevalo tudi večjo ozaveščenost in izvajanje načela hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki;
whereas the world population is growing and therefore the total consumption is expected to increase significantly, which puts more pressure on waste management; whereas the solution to this problem would require, among other things, an increased awareness and implementation of the waste hierarchy principle;
ker Odbor za peticije nima nikakršne preventivne ali sodne pristojnosti, vendar pa lahko zaščiti interese državljanov, zlasti kadar se težave pojavljajo pri uporabi zakonodaje EU, in sicer tako, da sodeluje s pristojnimi organi pri iskanju rešitev ali pojasnil, povezanih z zadevami, obravnavanimi v peticijah;
whereas the Committee on Petitions has no preventive or judicial competence, but is able to defend citizens' interests, notably when problems arise in the application of EU law, by cooperating with the responsible authorities to find solutions or explanations for the matters raised by petitions;
poziva države članice, naj nemudoma prenesejo okvirno direktivo o odpadkih in zagotovijo popolno skladnost z vsemi njenimi zahtevami, zlasti z oblikovanjem in izvajanjem celovitih načrtov ravnanja z odpadki, vključno s pravočasno uresničitvijo vseh zastavljenih ciljev v okviru evropske zakonodaje;
Calls on the Member States to transpose the WFD without further delay and to ensure full compliance with all its requirements, in particular establishing and implementing comprehensive waste management plans, including the timely conversion of all the set goals within the framework of European legislation;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj pozorno spremlja prenos direktive EU o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja v zakonodaje držav članic, da bo pravočasen in učinkovit; poziva jo, naj bo pri kaznivih dejanjih zoper okolje pozorna na vlogo vseh oblik organiziranega kriminala;
Calls on the Commission to carefully monitor the transposition by the Member States of the EU directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law, to ensure that it is done promptly and effectively; calls on the Commission to turn its attention to the role of all forms of organised crime in respect of environmental offences;
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da odpadki in onesnaženje predstavljajo hudo nevarnost za zdravje ljudi in celovitost okolja, poziva države članice, naj skladno z okvirno direktivo o odpadkih pospešijo uvajanje napredne strategije za ravnanje z odpadki;
Taking into consideration the fact that waste and pollution form a serious threat to human health and the integrity of the environment, urges the Member States to speed up the introduction of an advanced waste management strategy in accordance with the WFD;
poziva javne organe, naj priznajo, da so za vzpostavitev ustreznih strategij za ravnanje z odpadki, infrastrukture in zmogljivosti v večini držav članic potrebna velika vlaganja, in meni, da bi morali javni organi preučiti možnost namenitve ustreznega deleža sredstev iz Kohezijskega sklada za ta namen oziroma možnost pridobitve neposrednega financiranja iz Evropske investicijske banke;
Calls upon public authorities to recognise that major investments are required to establish correct waste management strategies, infrastructure and facilities in most Member States, and believes that they should give consideration to earmarking an appropriate proportion of Cohesion Fund resources for this purpose or seeking direct financing from the European Investment Bank;
meni, da je treba na ravni držav članic in EU okrepiti zmogljivosti za preverjanje in izvrševanje na kraju samem, da bi zagotovili večjo skladnost z zakonodajo o odpadkih, zato poziva države članice, naj okrepijo svoje zmogljivosti za inšpekcije, spremljanje in druge ukrepe na vseh ravneh verige ravnanja z odpadki, da bi bolje izvrševale zakonodajo o odpadkih, ter poziva Komisijo, naj predvidi posebne postopke, s katerimi bo omogočila celovito in učinkovito izvajanje načela subsidiarnosti v primeru velikih pomanjkljivosti v državah članicah;
Considers that on-site inspection and enforcement capacity needs to be strengthened at Member State and EU level in order to ensure better compliance with waste legislation and therefore urges Member States to strengthen their capacity for inspections, monitoring and other actions at all stages of the waste management chain to better enforce waste legislation, and calls on the Commission to make provision for specific procedures enabling the subsidiarity principle to be fully applied in the event of serious shortcomings on the part of Member States;
poziva Komisijo k oblikovanju posebnih smernic, ki bi pristojnim organom pomagale pri pravilnem izvajanju pravnega reda na področju odpadkov, vendar opozarja, da so viri, ki so na voljo na evropski ravni, aktualno neustrezni; zato meni, da je treba sprejeti dopolnilne finančne in upravne ukrepe za zagotavljanje večjih zmogljivosti za usmerjanje in usposabljanje uradnikov, zaposlenih v sektorju odpadkov;
Calls on the Commission for more specific guidance to be provided for competent authorities in order to assist them with the correct implementation of the waste acquis but notes that the resources available at European level are currently inadequate; considers, therefore, that complementary financial and administrative measures should be taken to provide better guidance and training facilities for officials working in the waste sector;
poziva Komisijo, naj prepozna in se bolj osredotoči na sistemske pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju direktiv, povezanih z odpadki, v državah članicah, kot so neustrezne mreže zmogljivosti za ravnanje z odpadki, prekomerno zanašanje na odlaganje odpadkov, rast količine odpadkov na prebivalca in nizke stopnje recikliranja;
Calls upon the Commission to identify and focus on the more systemic weaknesses in the implementation of waste-related directives by the Member States, such as inadequate networks of waste management facilities, excessive reliance on land filling, growing amounts of waste produced per capita or poor recycling rates;
meni, da vzpostavitev nove agencije EU za ravnanje z odpadki ni zaželena in da je obstoječa institucionalna struktura na ravni EU – ki temelji na Generalnemu direktoratu Komisije za okolje in Evropski agenciji za okolje kot središču strokovnega znanja in odličnosti – stroškovno učinkovitejša, čeprav jo je treba dodatno okrepiti, da bo dejavneje nadzorovala in skrbela za izvrševanje zakonodaje;
Believes that the establishment of a new EU Agency for waste management is not desirable and considers that the present institutional structure at EU level – based upon the Commission's DG Environment and the European Environment Agency as a centre of expertise and excellence – is more cost-effective, although these must be further reinforced in order to provide more active oversight and enforcement;
meni, da bi obstoječa Evropska agencija za okolje lahko pomagala v tem postopku in odigrala bolj konstruktivno vlogo pri poročanju o strategijah držav članic za ravnanje z odpadki ter pri prepoznavanju pomanjkljivosti s pomočjo ocenjevanja skladnosti med načrti ravnanja z odpadki, ki jih oblikujejo države članice, in zakonodajo EU;
Believes that the existing European Environment Agency could assist with this process and play a more constructive role in reporting on Member State waste management strategies and identifying weakness by assessing the compliance of waste management plans established by Member States with EU legislation;
meni, da tesnejše sodelovanje med organi na lokalni, regionalni in nacionalni ravni ponuja možnosti za doseganje pozitivnih rezultatov pri določanju modelov najboljših praks; ugotavlja, da bi Odbor regij, Europol, Evropsko omrežje za izvajanje in uveljavljanje okoljskega prava, združenje Municipal Waste Europe za ravnanje s občinskimi komunalnimi odpadki in Evropska zveza za ravnanje z odpadki in okoljske storitve (FEAD) lahko imeli koristnejšo vlogo pri organizaciji takšnih izmenjav in tako pripomogli tudi h krepitvi zaupanja med državljani, ki so prizadeti zaradi izvajanja nujno potrebne politike ravnanja z odpadki;
Considers that closer cooperation between authorities at local, regional and national level has the potential to deliver positive results in terms of identifying models of best practice; notes that the Committee of the Regions, Europol, the European Union Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law, Municipal Waste Europe and the FEAD, the European Federation representing the waste management industry, could play a more useful role in organising such exchanges and thus also help to build trust among the populations affected by essential waste policy implementation;
poziva države članice, ki se soočajo z očitnimi krizami na področju odpadkov, naj razmislijo o tem, da zagotavljajo učinkovitejše strategije za ravnanje z odpadki priložnosti tako za ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest in višjih prihodkov kot tudi za doseganje okoljske trajnostnosti s pomočjo ponovne uporabe, recikliranja in pridobivanja energije iz odpadkov;
Calls on the Member States which are confronted with manifest waste crises to consider the fact that more efficient waste management strategies provide opportunities for both employment creation and revenue enhancement while ensuring environmental sustainability through reuse, recycling and recovery of energy from waste;
opozarja, da je hierarhija v ciklu odpadkov ključni del Direktive 2008/98/ES in da mora v skladu s to direktivo predstavljati podlago za vsakršno ravnanje z odpadki; ugotavlja, da tudi ekonomski argumenti govorijo v prid izvajanju hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki in da se je treba najprej osredotočiti na preprečevanje, nato na ponovno uporabo in recikliranje ter šele potem na sežiganje odpadkov za pridobivanje energije, potratnim in netrajnostnim odlagališčemin pa se je treba v čim večji meri izogibati;
Recalls that the waste cycle hierarchy is a key element in Directive 2008/98/EC and, pursuant to the directive, should constitute the basis for all waste management; notes also that economic arguments speak in favour of following the waste hierarchy and focus first on prevention, then on reuse and recycling before incineration for energy and that wasteful and unsustainable landfills should be avoided as far as possible;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v tem okviru spodbujajo večjo okoljsko ozaveščenost prebivalstva o prednostih učinkovitega ravnanja z odpadki, zlasti z informiranjem o predhostih predhodnega ločevanja odpadkov in dejanskih stroških zbiranja gospodinjskih odpadkov, pa tudi o finančnih koristih, ki jih prinaša predelava gospodinjskih odpadkov;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to promote, in this context, greater environmental awareness among the population about the advantages of efficient waste management, notably by advising them of the merits of pre-sorting waste and the real cost of collecting household waste, as well as of the financial gain obtained from recovering this household waste;
meni, da bi tesnejše sodelovanje med organi držav članic in Odborom za peticije, ko ta obravnava neposredne pomisleke lokalnega prebivalstva, lahko predstavljalo odlično priložnost za spodbujanje dialoga med pristojnimi organi in lokalnimi skupnostmi o prednostnih nalogah, povezanih z izvajanjem strategij za ravnanje z odpadki, kar se lahko v nekaterih primerih izkaže za učinkovit način reševanja sporov na lokalni ravni;
Believes that closer cooperation between Member State authorities and the Petitions Committee when the latter is dealing with the direct concerns of local citizens would provide an excellent opportunity to facilitate dialogue between the responsible authorities and local communities on priorities as regards the implementation of waste strategies, and can in some cases constitute an effective remedy when this may be useful in resolving local disputes;
predlaga sprejetje skupnega standarda EU za barvno označevanje kategorij odpadkov, ki se ločujejo ali reciklirajo, s čimer bi olajšali in izboljšali sodelovanje državljanov pri ravnanju z odpadki ter njihovo razumevanje tega procesa, in meni, da bi ta ukrep v državah članicah lahko prispeval k pomembnemu in hitremu povečanju stopenj recikliranja;
Proposes that a common EU standard for colour-coding categories of waste for sorting and recycling be agreed so as to facilitate and improve citizens' participation in and understanding of the waste process, and considers that this may assist Member States' efforts to increase recycling rates significantly and quickly;
spodbuja zgodnji in učinkovit dialog med pristojnimi lokalnimi in regionalnimi organi ter lokalnim prebivalstvom v fazah načrtovanja, ki potekajo pred sprejetjem odločitve o izgradnji obratov za obdelavo odpadkov, pri čemer razume, da predstavlja odnos „ne na mojem dvorišču“ v zvezi s tem velik izziv;
Encourages early and effective dialogue between responsible local and regional authorities and local citizens in the planning stages before decisions are taken on the construction of waste treatment installations, while understanding that the NIMBY (‘not in my back yard’) attitude is a big challenge in this respect;
poudarja temeljni pomen pravilnega in popolnega izvajanja direktive o presoji vplivov na okolje ter ustreznega usklajevanja postopkov izdaje dovoljenj, ki izhajajo iz okoljske zakonodaje;
Emphasises the fundamental importance of the correct and full implementation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive and proper coordination of the permitting procedures required under environmental legislation;
poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bo celovita presoja vplivov na okolje opravljena pred sprejetjem kakršne koli odločitve o vzpostavitvi ali izgradnji novih zmogljivosti za ravnanje z odpadki, zlasti ko gre za sežigalnico ali obrat za metanizacijo oziroma za novo odlagališče, ki naj vedno predstavlja zadnjo možnost; meni, da bi morala biti takšna presoja obvezna;
Calls upon the Member States to ensure that a complete environmental impact assessment is conducted before any decision is taken to establish or construct a new waste facility, notably an incinerator or methanisation plant, or – as a last resort – a new landfill; believes that such assessments should be mandatory;
se zaveda, da je treba odločitve včasih sprejeti po nujnem postopku zaradi upravljanja perečih kriz z odpadki ali zaradi preprečevanja njihovega nastanka, vendar poudarja, da je treba tudi v teh primerih zagotoviti polno spoštovanje veljavne zakonodaje EU, zlasti ko sta v nevarnosti dolgoročno zdravje in dobro počutje lokalnih skupnosti;
Understands that in some cases urgent decisions are required to manage acute waste crises or to prevent crises developing, but emphasises that even in these cases, full respect for existing EU legislation must be guaranteed, particularly as the long-term health and well-being of local communities is at stake;
je prepričan, da je treba izboljšati dialog med javnimi organi, zasebnimi izvajalci in prizadetim prebivalstvom ter da morajo imeti državljani boljši dostop do objektivnih informacij, po potrebi pa morajo biti na voljo tudi bolj učinkovite mehanizme za upravno in sodno presojo;
Is convinced that dialogue between public authorities, private-sector operators and affected populations must be improved and that citizens must have better access to objective information, with more effective mechanisms for administrative and judicial reviews where these are necessary;