natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
izraža zaskrbljenost, v obdobju resnih omejitev javnih proračunov, glede močne osredotočenosti na naložbe zasebnega sektorja kot sredstva za pridobivanje več sredstev za financiranje razvoja; poudarja, da je razvojno sodelovanje edina politika zunanjega delovanja (poleg humanitarne pomoči), ki ni namenjena interesom EU, pač pa zaščiti interesov najbolj marginaliziranih in ranljivih prebivalcev na planetu; zato poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se javna finančna sredstva, ki se uporabljajo za podporo naložbam zasebnega sektorja na jugu, ne preusmerijo iz sektorjev, ki imajo že tako premalo finančnih sredstev (na primer programi za nedržavne akterje in organe lokalne skupnosti), in da bo taka pomoč dejansko omogočila razvoj domačega zasebnega sektorja ter malih in srednjih podjetij v državah z nizkim dohodkom;
Expresses its concern, at a time of serious public budget constraints, about the strong focus placed on private sector investment as a means to leverage more development finance resources; points out that development cooperation is the only external action policy (besides humanitarian aid) which has not been designed to serve EU interests but rather to defend the interests of the most marginalised and vulnerable populations on this planet; therefore, urges the Commission to ensure that any public finance used to support private sector investment in the South is not diverted from already under-funded sectors (as in the case of the programmes for non-state actors and local authorities for instance), and that such support will effectively enable the development of the domestic private sector and small and medium enterprises in low-income countries;
se strinja, da je treba uporabiti različen pristop do različnih skupin držav v razvoju? in da bi lahko tradicionalna finančna pomoč postala manj pomembna za države v vzponu; meni, da bi se morala pomoč za države v vzponu poleg spodbujanja trajnostne gospodarske rasti še vedno osredotočati na krepitev davčne politike partnerskih držav in spodbujanje uporabe domačega prihodka, zaradi česar bi se morali zmanjšati revščina in odvisnost od pomoči;
Agrees that a differentiated approach to the diverse group of developing countries is needed, and that traditional financial aid may become less relevant for emerging countries; considers that aid for emerging countries, while promoting sustainable economic growth, should still focus on reinforcing the partner country's fiscal policy and promoting mobilisation of domestic revenue which should lead to the reduction of poverty and of aid dependency;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi večjo podporo za pomoč državam v razvoju in državam v vzponu pri davčnih reformah z namenom podpreti učinkovite, uspešne, pravične in vzdržne davčne sisteme; poziva Komisijo, naj učinkovito vključi načela dobrega upravljanja v davčnih zadevah v načrtovanje, izvajanje in spremljanje državnih in regionalnih strateških dokumentov ter hkrati sprejme potrebne ukrepe za uveljavitev poročanja nadnacionalnih podjetij po posameznih državah;
Urges the Commission to provide enhanced support for assisting developing and emerging countries in tax reforms, with the aim of supporting effective, efficient, fair and sustainable tax systems; calls on the Commission to effectively integrate the principles of good governance in tax matters into the programming, implementation and monitoring of country and regional strategy papers, while taking the necessary measures to enforce country-by-country reporting by transnational companies;
zato poudarja, da bi moral instrument za razvojno sodelovanje tudi v prihodnje zajemati vse države v razvoju v geografskih regijah, ki jih pokriva in ki se ujemajo s seznamom držav v razvoju, ki ga je pripravil OECD/DAC;
Stresses that the future development cooperation instrument should continue to cover all developing countries of the geographic regions to which it applies, according to the OECD/DAC list of developing countries;
poziva k večji usklajenosti med Komisijo in državami članicami, da bi se doseglo izvajanje člena 210 PDEU, in podpira razvoj skupnih evropskih strateških dokumentov; je prepričan, da morajo vsi programski dokumenti EU za vsako državo in regijo vključevati podrobne in posodobljene matrike donatorjev in posebno poglavje o učinkovitosti pomoči EU, z navedbo ukrepov, sprejetih za boljše usklajevanje, uskladitev in dopolnjevanje donatorjev ter boljšo porazdelitev dela med donatorji, zlasti med državami članicami EU;
Calls for closer coordination between the Commission and Member States so as to achieve the Treaty prescription of Article 210 TFEU, and supports the development of joint European strategy papers; believes that all EU programming documents for each country and region should include detailed and up-to-date donor matrices, as well as a special chapter on EU aid effectiveness, specifying actions taken to increase donor coordination, harmonisation and complementarity and to improve the division of labour among donors and particularly among EU Member States;
ponovno poziva, naj se evropski razvojni sklad vključi v proračun EU, kar bi poenostavilo postopke in izboljšalo učinkovitost in uspešnost pomoči Evropske komisije; vztraja, da to ne bi smelo povzročiti znižanja splošnih zneskov za financiranje instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje in evropskega razvojnega sklada na ravni EU ter znižanja skupnih zneskov sredstev, ki so na voljo na ravni EU za uradno razvojno pomoč;
Reiterates its call for the European Development Fund (EDF) to be brought into the EU budget, which would simplify procedures and increase the effectiveness and efficiency of EC aid; insists that this should not lead to any reduction in the global amounts of funding at EU level for the DCI and for the EDF, nor in the total amount of funding made available at EU level for ODA;
je prepričan, da je treba okrepiti pomoč za ranljive skupine (ženske, invalide, mlade in brezposelne, domorodna ljudstva) ter za vključevanje načela enakosti spolov in reševanje drugih horizontalnih vprašanj; vztraja, da mora instrument, ki bo nasledil instrument za razvojno sodelovanje, v programskih dokumentih vsebovati jasna primerjalna merila, da se zagotovi merjenje učinka posegov EU na teh področjih;
Believes that support for vulnerable groups (women, people with disabilities, young and unemployed people, indigenous people), as well as for gender mainstreaming and for addressing other ‘cross-cutting’ issues, must be enhanced; insists that the DCI successor instrument requires clear benchmarks in programming documents to ensure that the impact of EU intervention in these areas can be measured;
poudarja, da je vključevanje organov lokalnih skupnosti v razvojne politike nujno za doseganje razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja in zagotavljanje dobrega upravljanja; zlasti opozarja, da morajo lokalne oblasti odigrati kritično vlogo na področjih, kot so izobraževanje, boj proti lakoti, bogastvo, voda, higiena, socialna kohezija in lokalni gospodarski razvoj itd.; zato meni, da je v naslednjem finančnem instrumentu nujno nadgraditi njihovo vlogo, v skladu z načelom prevzemanja odgovornosti za razvoj;
Stresses that the involvement of local authorities in development policies is essential for achieving the MDGs and ensuring good governance; points out, in particular, that local authorities have a critical role to play in areas such as education, combating hunger, health, water, sanitation, social cohesion and local economic development, etc.; deems it essential, therefore, to upgrade their role in the next financial instrument, in line with the principle of development ownership;
poudarja, da morata Komisija Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje vzdrževati reden in strukturiran dialog z nedržavnimi akterji in lokalnimi organi o pripravi, izvajanju in vrednotenju strateških dokumentov; zato poudarja, da je treba sklepe strukturiranega dialoga upoštevati v prihodnjih finančnih instrumentih;
Underlines the need for a regular and structured dialogue between the Commission, the EEAS, non-state actors (NSAs) and local authorities (LAs) on the programming, implementation and evaluation of strategy papers; emphasises therefore the need to take the conclusions of the Structured Dialogue into account in future financial instruments;
poudarja, da so potrebne prilagodljive določbe, ki bi Evropski uniji omogočile odziv na spremembe potrebi in prednostnih nalog; predlaga, naj se model evropskega razvojnega sklada za omejena sredstva neprogramirane pomoči za države preuči kot možni model za prihodnji instrument za razvojno sodelovanje; vendar poudarja, da morajo prožnejše uporabljena sredstva stremeti k uresničevanju pravih razvojnih ciljev;
Stresses the need for flexibility provisions which allow the EU to respond to changes in terms of needs and priorities; suggests an examination of the EDF model of limited country envelopes of non-programmed aid as a possible model for the future development cooperation instrument; stresses, however, that funds used in a more flexible manner must pursue genuine development objectives;
meni, da bi moral novi instrument za razvojno sodelovanje služiti kot podlaga za ciljno in prožnejšo pomoč v kriznih razmerah; je prepričan, da bo nova finančna struktura pomagala zagotoviti povezavo dejavnosti pomoči, obnove in razvoja (LRRD) s prožnostjo in dopolnjevanjem mehanizmov financiranja;
Considers that the new development cooperation instrument should provide a basis for targeted and more flexible aid to situations of fragility; believes that the new financial architecture should help to ensure proper linkage of relief, rehabilitation and development (LRRD) through flexibility and complementarity of the funding mechanisms;
poziva, naj se 20 % porabe iz geografskih programov nameni za osnovne socialne storitve, kot so jih opredelili Združeni narodi v razvojnih ciljih tisočletja (kazalnik 8.2 cilja 8: oblikovanje svetovnega partnerstva za razvoj);
Calls for a benchmark of 20% of spending under geographic programmes to be allocated to basic social services as defined by the United Nations in the MDGs (indicator 8.2 for goal 8: ‘Develop a global partnership for development’);
vztraja pri strogih merilih upravičenosti do proračunske podpore; vztraja, da se mora Komisija vzdržati proračunske podpore pri državah, kjer ni mogoče zagotoviti pregledne javne porabe, da morajo proračunsko podporo vedno spremljati ukrepi za razvoj parlamentarnega nadzora in revizijskih zmogljivosti ter za povečanje preglednosti in javnega dostopa do informacij v državi prejemnici ter da je treba v nadzor nad proračunsko podporo vključiti civilno družbo;
Insists on strict eligibility criteria for budget support; insists that the Commission must refrain from using budget support in countries where transparency in public spending cannot be assured, that budget support must always be accompanied by actions to develop the receiving country's parliamentary control and audit capacities and to increase transparency and public access to information, and that civil society should be involved in monitoring budget support;
priznava pomembno vlogo civilne družbe pri razvoju, na primer vlogo nadzornika vlade, ki zagotavlja odgovornost slednje, in poziva, naj se civilni družbi v državah v razvoju zagotovi ustrezno financiranje;
Recognises the important roles that civil society plays in development, such as acting as a watchdog in relation to government to ensure accountability, and calls for adequate funding to be directed towards civil society in developing countries;
ponavlja zahtevo, naj Komisija predloži skupen številčni pregled splošne proračunske pomoči, sektorske pomoči, pomoči za posamezne projekte ali pomoči, ki je bila v kakršni koli obliki dodeljena za lokalno upravo; poudarja, da bi ta skupni pregled izboljšal skladnost pomoči, zagotovljene lokalni upravi, in upravljanje v partnerskih državah
Repeats its call for the Commission to produce a comprehensive financial analysis covering general budget support, support by sector, support by project and support of any other kind granted to local government; stresses that having this global picture would make support granted to local government more consistent and improve governance in partner countries;
ugotavlja, da so vsi tematski programi iz instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje dokazali svoj pomen, in poudarja, da je treba nujno ohraniti tematske in geografske programe, vendar poziva k preusmeritvi glede na nove izzive, kot so svetovna finančna in gospodarska kriza, svetovna kriza zaradi visokih cen hrane, podnebne spremembe in posebne potrebe ranljivih in tranzicijskih držav;
Notes that all thematic programmes under the DCI have proven their relevance, and emphasises that it is imperative to maintain both thematic and geographic programmes, but calls for some refocusing in the light of new challenges, such as the global financial and economic crisis, the global food crisis, climate change and special needs of fragile states and states in transition;
poudarja, da so migracije področje, kjer je nujno treba dati prednost usklajenosti politik za razvoj pred kratkoročnim obravnavanjem migracij s strani EU, ki je zlasti usmerjeno v boj proti nezakonitim migracijam; poudarja, da se razvojni skladi za migracije ne bi smeli uporabiti za krepitev upravljanja meja ter preprečevanje nezakonitega priseljevanja; vztraja, da morajo biti vsi prihodnji tematski programi o migraciji popolnoma usklajeni z razvojnimi cilji EU in da mora temeljno financiranje tega programa izpolnjevati merila upravičenosti za uradno razvojno pomoč; zlasti poudarja, da bi morali imeti v okviru tematskega programa prednost projekti, ki obravnavajo migracije jug-jug;
Points out that migration is an area in which there is a clear need to prioritise policy coherence for development over short-term EU migration considerations, mostly aimed at fighting illegal immigration; highlights that development funds for migration should not be used for strengthening border management and combating illegal immigration; insists that any future thematic programme on migration must be fully aligned with the EU's development objectives and that the core funding under this programme must fulfil the ODA eligibility criteria; in particular, stresses that projects dealing with South-South migration should be given priority within the thematic programme;
poudarja, da se mora novi tematski program o vlaganju v ljudi osredotočiti na, vendar ne izključno, doseganje tistih razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, ki so najdlje od uresničitve, in nameniti posebno pozornost državam in regijam s kritičnimi kazalniki razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; poudarja, da je osnovno izobraževanje in opismenjevanje začetna točka procesa osveščanja in prevzemanja odgovornosti za razvoj; zato poziva, naj program vključuje tudi osredotočenost na izobraževanje kot orodje za samostojnost in udeležbo;
Stresses that a new thematic programme on ‘Investing in People’ must focus on – but not be limited to – the achievement of those MDGs which are most off-track, with particular attention to countries and regions with critical MDG indicators; emphasises that basic education and alphabetisation are the starting point for the process of awareness raising and for development ownership; therefore calls for the programme to include a focus on education as a tool for emancipation and participation;
je prepričan, da bi moral novi instrument zagotoviti različen pristop za financiranje organizacij civilne družbe in lokalnih oblasti ter preprečiti nesmiselno tekmovalnost med njimi; poudarja, da je treba obravnavati problem prevelikega števila vlog v sedanjem programu; poziva, naj se rezultati strukturiranega dialoga v celoti odrazijo v prihodnjem tematskem programu in predlagani obliki pomoči;
Believes that the new instrument should provide for a differentiated approach to funding for civil society organisations and local authorities, and also avoid pointless competition between the two types of actor; stresses the need to address the problem of the current programme's over-subscription; calls for the results of the Structured Dialogue to be fully reflected in the future thematic programme and the proposed aid modalities;
poudarja, da je eden od razlogov za to, da razvojni cilji tisočletja niso bili doseženi, dejstvo, da se ne zavedamo prispevka okolja, naravnih virov in ekosistemov k razvoju človeštva in odpravi revščine; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je, medtem ko evropska uradna razvojna pomoč dodeljuje samo 3 % vseh odhodkov za okoljske zadeve, dodatna težava tudi, da se del finančnih sredstev EU in držav članic za države v razvoju vlaga v projekte, ki spodbujajo podnebne spremembe, namesto da bi jih preprečevali; poudarja, da je treba izboljšati usklajenost politik za razvoj na področju podnebnih sprememb, zlasti glede financiranja podnebja in vključevanja vprašanj v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami v razvojno sodelovanje EU;
Points out that one of the reasons why the MDGs have not been fulfilled is the failure to recognise the contributions of the environment, natural resources and ecosystems to human development and poverty elimination; notes with concern that, while current European ODA allocates only 3% of total spending to environmental issues, an additional problem is that a part of the EU and Member States' funding to developing countries is invested in projects that foster climate change, rather than mitigate it; stresses that policy coherence for development must be improved in the area of climate change, especially in relation to climate funding and mainstreaming of climate change concerns into EU development cooperation;
poudarja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem Posebnem poročilu 6/2006 zaključilo, da je Komisija pri vključevanju okolja v svoje razvojno sodelovanje od leta 2001 dosegla le omejen napredek, saj v državnih strateških dokumentih okoljska vprašanja niso bila dovolj upoštevana; v skladu s tem poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se bodo okoljska vprašanja bolje vključevala in sistematično spremljala v vseh zunanjih politikah in finančnih instrumentih, zlasti glede na sedanje izzive zaradi podnebnih sprememb in izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti;
Points out that the Court of Auditors concluded in its ‘Special Report 6/2006’ that the EU has made only limited progress since 2001 in mainstreaming the environment in its development cooperation, as Country Strategy Papers did not take sufficient account of environmental issues; accordingly, urges the Commission to ensure that environmental issues are better mainstreamed and systematically monitored throughout all external policies and financial instruments, especially in the face of the current challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss;
poudarja, da za instrument za razvojno sodelovanje v celoti velja člen 290 PDEU, zato poudarja, da je za sklepe, ki izpolnjujejo merila iz člena 290 PDEU, vključno z opredelitvijo splošnih ciljev, prednostnih nalog, pričakovanih rezultatov in dodeljevanje sredstev obvezna uporaba postopka v zvezi z delegiranimi akti;
Reiterates that Article 290 TFEU is fully applicable to the DCI, and therefore emphasises that application of the delegated acts procedure is compulsory for those decisions which fulfil the criteria of Article 290 TFEU, including on the establishment of general objectives, priorities, expected results and financial allocations;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. junija 2011 o možnostih politike za napredek na področju evropskega pogodbenega prava za potrošnike in podjetja ( 2011/2013(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 8 June 2011 on policy options for progress towards a European Contract Law for consumers and businesses ( 2011/2013(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije z dne 1. julija 2010 o možnostih politike za napredek na področju evropskega pogodbenega prava za potrošnike in podjetja ( KOM(2010)0348 ),
having regard to the Green Paper from the Commission of 1 July 2010 on policy options for progress towards a European Contract Law for consumers and businesses ( COM(2010)0348 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepa Komisije 2010/233/EU z dne 26. aprila 2010 o ustanovitvi strokovne skupine za skupni referenčni okvir na področju evropskega pogodbenega prava UL L 105, 27.4.2010, str.
having regard to Commission Decision 2010/233/EU of 26 April 2010 setting up the Expert Group on a Common Frame of Reference in the area of European contract law OJ L 105, 27.4.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. julija 2001 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu ( KOM(2001)0398 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 11 July 2001 on European Contract Law ( COM(2001)0398 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 12. februarja 2003 z naslovom „Skladnejše evropsko pogodbeno pravo – akcijski načrt“ ( KOM(2003)0068 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 12 February 2003 entitled ‘A more coherent European Contract Law – An Action Plan’ ( COM(2003)0068 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 23. septembra 2005 z naslovom „Prvo letno poročilo o napredku v zvezi z evropskim pogodbenim pravom in pregledom pravnega reda Skupnosti“( KOM(2005)0456 ) in poročila Komisije z dne 25. julija 2007 z naslovom „Drugo poročilo o napredku skupnega referenčnega okvira“ ( KOM(2007)0447 ),
having regard to the report from the Commission of 23 September 2005 entitled ‘First Annual Progress Report on European Contract Law and the Acquis Review’ ( COM(2005)0456 ) and to the report from the Commission of 25 July 2007 entitled ‘Second Progress Report on the Common Frame of Reference’ ( COM(2007)0447 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 22. oktobra 2009 o čezmejnem e-trgovanju med podjetji in potrošniki v EU ( KOM(2009)0557 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 22 October 2009 on Cross-Border Business to Consumer e-Commerce in the EU ( COM(2009)0557 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 3. septembra 2008 o skupnem referenčnem okviru za evropsko pogodbeno pravo UL C 295 E, 4.12.2009, str.
having regard to its resolution of 3 September 2008 on the common frame of reference for European contract law OJ C 295 E, 4.12.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. decembra 2007 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu UL C 323 E, 18.12.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 12 December 2007 on European contract law OJ C 323 E, 18.12.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o tej temi z 26. maja 1989 UL C 158, 26.6.1989, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 26 May 1989 OJ C 158, 26.6.1989, p.
, 15. novembra 2001 UL C 140 E, 13.6.2002, str.
, 15 November 2001 OJ 140 E, 13.6.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A7-0164/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A7-0164/2011 ),
ker se že veliko let razpravlja o pobudi o evropskem pogodbenem pravu, ki je namenjena reševanju težav na notranjem trgu, ki so jih med drugim ustvarile razlike med pogodbenimi pravi,
whereas the initiative on European contract law, which seeks to address Single Market problems created, inter alia, by divergent bodies of contract law, has been under discussion for many years,
ker je po svetovni finančni krizi pomembneje kot kdajkoli, da se zagotovi usklajena ureditev evropskega pogodbenega prava za polno uresničevanje potenciala notranjega trga in s tem prispeva k uresničevanju naših ciljev iz strategije Evropa 2020,
whereas, in the wake of the global financial crisis, it appears more important than ever to provide a coherent European contract law regime in order to realise the full potential of the internal market, and thus help meet our Europe 2020 goals,
ker enotni trg zaradi številnih dejavnikov, med drugim zato, ker se ne izvaja obstoječa zakonodaja o enotnem trgu, ostaja razdrobljen,
whereas the Single Market remains fragmented, owing to many factors, including failure to implement existing Single Market legislation,