natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
podpira Komisijo v prizadevanjih za zagotovitev združljivosti in medobratovalnosti Galilea z drugimi satelitskimi navigacijskimi sistemi ter za doseganje globalne standardizacije; v zvezi s tem spodbuja Komisijo in države članice, naj uporabijo vsa razpoložljiva sredstva za hitro rešitev sedanjih vprašanj s Kitajsko v zvezi z združljivosti;
Supports the Commission in its efforts to ensure the compatibility and interoperability of Galileo with other satellite navigation systems and to strive for global standardisation; in this respect, urges the Commission and Member States to deploy all available means to quickly resolve the current compatibility issues with China;
poudarja strateški pomen vesoljske politike in programa GNSS pri prizadevanjih za uresničitev resnične evropske industrijske politike, osnovane na konkretnih projektih, od katerih imajo državljani in podjetja oprijemljive koristi; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj prizna pomembno vlogo, ki jo ima lahko satelitska navigacija, in jo vključi v razvoj vseh drugih ustreznih politik Skupnosti;
Emphasises the strategic importance of space policy and the GNSS programme in the drive to establish a genuine European industrial policy based on practical projects with tangible benefits for the public and for business; calls, in that respect, on the Commission to recognise the important role that satellite navigation can play and to integrate it in the development of all other relevant Community policies;
poudarja, da je dolgoročna stabilnost pomembna za zmanjšanje dodatnih zamud, dragega preoblikovanja in destabilizacije baze uporabnikov; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj hitro predstavi zakonodajne predloge o prihodnji ravni storitev, financiranju in upravljanju programov GNSS; poleg tega meni, da je nujno zagotoviti ohranitev ustreznega znanja in izkušenj ter pridobljenega strokovnega znanja, da bi bili programi dobro upravljani;
Points out that long-term stability is important in order to minimise additional delays, costly redesign and destabilisation of the user base; calls, in this respect, on the Commission to quickly submit legislative proposals on the future level of services, financing and governance of the GNSS programmes; believes, furthermore, that it is vital to ensure the retention of relevant know-how and acquired expertise so that the programmes are well managed;
poziva Komisijo, naj v oceno učinka, ki bo izvedena v okviru prihodnjega zakonodajnega predloga, vključi jasne in celovite informacije o:
Calls on the Commission to include in the impact assessment to be performed in the framework of the upcoming legislative proposal clear and comprehensive information on:
tehničnih specifikacijah (točnost, geografska pokritost, celovitost itd.) za storitve (odprte storitve, varstvo človeškega življenja, komercialne storitve, regulirane javne storitve), ki bi jih lahko zagotovile različne konfiguracije satelitov sistema Galileo (vključno z začetno operativno zmogljivostjo in popolno operativno zmogljivostjo, ob uporabi skupaj z drugimi sistemi GNSS ali samostojno);
the technical specifications (accuracy, geographical coverage, integrity, etc.) for the services (Open Services, Safety of Life, Commercial Services, Public Regulated Services) that the various Galileo satellite configurations could provide (including IOC and FOC, used in combination with other GNSS systems or on a stand-alone basis);
vlogi storitev EGNOS v zvezi z različnimi možnimi konfiguracijami satelitov sistema Galileo ter ali naj se EGNOS ohrani v primeru popolne operativne zmogljivosti ali ne;
the role of EGNOS services with regard to the various possible Galileo configurations and whether or not EGNOS should be kept in a FOC constellation;
stroških možnih konfiguracij satelitov sistemov Galileo in EGNOS ne le z vidika naložb v infrastrukturo, pa tudi stroškov upravljanja in nepredvidljivih stroškov (vključno z začetno operativno zmogljivostjo in popolno operativno zmogljivostjo ali drugimi možnostmi);
the costs of the possible Galileo and EGNOS configurations in terms of not just infrastructure investment but also management and contingency costs (including IOC, FOC and other possible options);
meni, da bi se Galileo in EGNOS, ki sta evropska programa v lasti EU, ki izpolnjujejo javni interes na ravni EU, morala še naprej financirati iz proračuna EU; meni, da je poleg prispevka za proračun EU, treba raziskati vse možne vire financiranja, vključno z inovativnimi oblikami financiranja; poudarja, da takšne ad hoc zasilne proračunske rešitve, kot smo jih videli v preteklosti, lahko ogrozijo uspeh in dodano vrednost strateških, obsežnih projektov EU in z njimi povezan politični zagon; zato meni, da je treba najti temeljite, globalne in dolgoročne finančne rešitve; predlaga, da se zagotovi vnaprej določen letni znesek iz proračuna EU (za financiranje preostale infrastrukture Galilea in operativnih stroškov); poudarja, da so ocenjeni zneski iz vmesnega poročila za obdobje do leta 2013 okvirni, ter poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi natančno razčlenitev ocenjenih finančnih potreb do poletja 2011, da bi povečala upravičljivost, predvidljivost in preglednost projekta;
Considers that Galileo and EGNOS, as European programmes owned by the EU which address a public interest at EU level, should mainly be financed through the EU budget; believes that – alongside the contribution from the EU budget – all possible sources of financing should be investigated, including innovative forms of financing; emphasises that ad hoc, emergency budgetary solutions such as those seen in the past are likely to jeopardise the success and added value of such strategic, large-scale EU projects and undermine the political momentum around them; believes, therefore, that a sound, global and long-term financing solution should be found; suggests that a predetermined annual amount should be provided from the EU budget (for the financing of the remaining Galileo infrastructure as well as the operating costs); points out that the estimated figures included in the mid-term review for the period after 2013 are indicative, and calls on the Commission to present a detailed breakdown of the estimated financial needs by summer 2011, in order to increase the accountability, predictability and transparency of the project;
meni, da bi bilo treba nepričakovane dodatne stroške financirati iz proračuna Skupnosti brez ogrožanja drugih obstoječih programov; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj oceni možnost ustanovitve „rezervnega sklada Galileo“ za pokritje takih nepričakovanih stroškov;
Believes that unexpected additional costs should be financed from the Community budget without endangering other existing programmes; calls, in this respect, on the Commission to assess the possibility of establishing a ‘Galileo reserve fund’ to cover such unexpected costs;
meni, da bi morali pri dolgoročni strukturi vodenja in upravljanja globalnega satelitskega navigacijskega sistema obravnavati porazdelitev nalog med Komisijo, Agencijo za evropski GNSS ter Evropsko vesoljsko agencijo, pa tudi druga pomembna vprašanja, kot so ustrezna delitev stroškov, mehanizem delitve prihodkov, ureditev odgovornosti, cenovna politika ter morebitna udeležba in prispevek zasebnega sektorja pri programih globalnega satelitskega navigacijskega sistema; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj hitro napreduje pri potekajočem razmisleku o prihodnjih sistemih upravljanja delovanja sistema, prevzame odgovornost za dolgoročno delovanje in prilagoditev infrastrukture, zagotovi stalni dotok podatkov in storitev uporabnikom in čim bolj poveča priložnosti za razvoj komercialnih storitev;
Believes that the long-term governance and management structure of GNSS should address the division of tasks and responsibilities between the Commission, the GSA and the European Space Agency (ESA), as well as other relevant issues, such as appropriate cost-sharing, the revenue-sharing mechanism, the liability regime, pricing policy and the possible involvement and contribution of the private sector in the GNSS programmes; calls, in this context, on the Commission to make swift progress with the ongoing reflection on future governance schemes for the operation of the system, to take responsibility for long-term operations and adaptation of the infrastructure, to ensure the delivery of continuous data and services to users, and to maximise opportunities for the development of commercial services;
poudarja pomen popolne preglednosti, finančne ustreznosti, upravičenosti in kolikor je mogoče odgovornega upravljanja vseh dolgoročnih struktur upravljanja GNSS; v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da bi bilo potrebno redno usklajevanje s Svetom in Evropskim parlamentom, ki bi moralo vključevati podrobne tekoče informacije;
Stresses the importance of any long-term governance and management structure of GNSS being fully transparent, financially sound and accountable and managed in the most responsible manner possible; notes, in this regard, that coordination with the Council and the European Parliament should take place on a regular basis and should include detailed updates;
poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi primerne mehanizme, s katerimi bo zagotovila, da bodo storitve in aplikacije na podlagi globalnega satelitskega navigacijskega sistema, tako zasebne kot javno regulirane, upoštevale temeljne pravice državljanov, na primer zasebnost in varstvo podatkov;
Calls on the Commission to establish appropriate mechanisms to ensure that GNSS based services and applications, both private and public regulated, comply with fundamental citizens' rights such as privacy and data protection;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in Evropski vesoljski agenciji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the ESA.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. junija 2011 o vlaganju v prihodnost: novi večletni finančni okvir za konkurenčno, trajnostno in vključujočo Evropo ( 2010/2211(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 8 June 2011 on Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe ( 2010/2211(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti njenega člena 312,
having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular Article 312 thereof,
, in njegovih izvedbenih pravil,
and its implementing rules,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o pregledu proračuna EU ( KOM(2010)0700 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission on the EU Budget Review ( COM(2010)0700 ),
ob upoštevanju svojega sklepa z dne 16. junija 2010 o ustanovitvi posebnega odbora za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0225 .
having regard to its decision of 16 June 2010 setting up a special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0225 .
ob upoštevanju prispevkov iz avstrijskega parlamenta (
having regard to the contributions from the Austrian
), češke parlamentarne zbornice, danskega parlamenta (
, the Czech Chamber, the Danish
), estonskega parlamenta (
, the Estonian
Deutscher Bundestag
Deutscher Bundestag
Deutscher Bundesrat
Deutscher Bundesrat
), irskega parlamenta (
, the Irish
), litvanskega parlamenta (
, the Lithuanian
), latvijskega parlamenta (
, the Latvian
), portugalskega parlamenta (
, the Portuguese
) nizozemskega spodnjega doma (
, the Dutch
) in švedskega parlamenta (
, and the Swedish
ob upoštevanju poročila Posebnega odbora za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva za trajnostno Evropsko unijo po letu 2013 ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za promet in turizem, Odbora za regionalni razvoj, Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ter Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov( A7-0193/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Special committee on the Policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Transport and Tourism, the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, the Committee on Culture and Education and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A7-0193/2011 ),
ker se je Parlament odločil, da ustanovi posebni odbor z naslednjimi pooblastili:
whereas the Parliament decided to set up a special committee with the following mandate:
opredeliti politične prednostne naloge Parlamenta za večletni finančni okvir po letu 2013 z zakonodajnega in proračunskega vidika,
to define the Parliament's political priorities for the post-2013 MFF both in legislative and budgetary terms,
oceniti finančna sredstva, ki jih Unija potrebuje za dosego svojih ciljev in izvedbo politik v obdobju, ki se začne s 1. januarjem 2014,
to estimate the financial resources necessary for the Union to attain its objectives and carry out its policies for the period starting 1 January 2014,
določiti trajanje naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira,
to define the duration of the next MFF,
predlagati strukturo prihodnjega večletnega finančnega okvira v skladu s temi prednostnimi nalogami in cilji, ki bo izkazoval glavna področja dejavnosti Unije,
to propose, in accordance with those priorities and objectives, a structure for the future MFF, indicating the main areas of Union activity,
pripraviti smernice za okvirno razporeditev sredstev med različne razdelke odhodkov večletnega finančnega okvira in znotraj njih v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami in predlagano strukturo;
to submit guidelines for an indicative allocation of resources between and within the different headings of expenditure of the MFF in line with the priorities and proposed structure,
opredeliti povezavo med reformo sistema financiranja proračuna EU in pregledom odhodkov, ki bo Odboru za proračun zagotovila dobro podlago za pogajanja o novem večletnem finančnem okviru;
to specify the link between a reform of the financing system of the EU budget and a review of expenditure to provide the Committee on Budgets with a sound basis for negotiations on the new MFF,
ker bi posebni odbor moral svoje končno poročilo predstaviti preden Komisija predloži svoje predloge za naslednji večletni finančni okvir,
whereas the special committee should present its final report before the Commission submits its proposals on the next MFF,
ker si mora Evropska unija v skladu s členom 311 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije zagotoviti potrebna sredstva za uresničevanje ciljev in izvajanje politik ter se v celoti financirati iz lastnih sredstev,
whereas in accordance with Article 311 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Union is to provide itself with the means necessary to attain its objectives and carry through its policies and is to be financed wholly from own resources,
ker je treba Evropski parlament skladno s členoma 312(5) in 324 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ustrezno vključiti v proces pogajanj o naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru,
whereas in accordance with Articles 312(5) and 324 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the European Parliament must be properly involved in the process of negotiating the next MFF,
ker začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe krepi politike Unije in ustvarja nova področja pristojnosti, kar bi se moralo odražati v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru,
whereas the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon strengthens Union policies and creates new fields of competence which should have a reflection in the next MFF,
ker izzivi, s katerimi se soočajo Unija in njeni državljani, kot so na primer svetovna gospodarska kriza, hitra rast gospodarstev v vzponu, prehod v trajnostno družbo in gospodarstvo, ki učinkovito izkorišča vire, spopadanje s podnebnimi spremembami, demografski izzivi, vključno z vključevanjem priseljencev in zaščito prosilcev za azil, sprememba globalne porazdelitve proizvodnje in prihrankov h gospodarstvom v vzponu, boj proti revščini ter grožnje naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek, terorizma in organiziranega kriminala, zahtevajo odločen odziv Unije in njenih držav članic,
whereas the challenges faced by the Union and its citizens, such as the global economic crisis, the rapid rise of emerging economies, the transition to a sustainable society and resource efficient economy, tackling climate change, demographic challenges, including the integration of immigrants and the protection of asylum seekers, the shift in the global distribution of production and savings to emerging economies, the fight against poverty, as well as the threats of natural and man-made disasters, terrorism and organised crime, require a strong response from the Union and its Member States,
ker ima EU na mednarodni ravni večjo težo kot vse države članice skupaj, če bi nastopale posamezno,
whereas the European Union carries more weight at international level than the sum of its individual Member States,
ker mora biti glavni cilj kohezijske politike EU zmanjšanje še vedno prisotnih socialnih, gospodarskih in ozemeljskih razlik v Uniji, in ker ima prepoznavna in uspešna kohezijska politika že sama po sebi evropsko dodano vrednost in bi morala koristiti vsem državam članicam EU,
whereas the main target of EU cohesion policy should continue being the reduction of still existing social, economic, and territorial disparities across the Union, and whereas a visible and successful cohesion policy has a European Added Value by itself and should benefit all EU Member States,
ker državljani EU od Unije zahtevajo več in ker so bolj kritični do njenega delovanja ter ker se bo javnost z Unijo ponovno poistovetila šele, ko bodo njeni državljani prepričani, da Unija bolje streže njihovim vrednotam in interesom,
whereas EU citizens have become more demanding of the Union and also more critical of its performance; and whereas public ownership of the Union will only return when its citizens are confident that their values and interests are better served by the Union,
ker bi strategija Evropa 2020 z ustvarjanjem delovnih mest ter pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rastjo Evropi morala pomagati, da iz krize izide močnejša; ker ta strategija temelji na petih krovnih ciljih Unije glede spodbujanja zaposlovanja, izboljšanja pogojev za inovacije, raziskave in razvoj, doseganja ciljev na področju podnebnih sprememb in energije, izboljšanja ravni izobrazbe ter spodbujanje socialne vključenosti, zlasti z zmanjševanjem revščine,
whereas the Europe 2020 strategy should help Europe recover from the crisis and emerge stronger, through job creation and smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; whereas this strategy is based on five Union headline targets on promoting employment, improving the conditions for innovation, research and development, meeting climate change and energy objectives, improving education levels and promoting social inclusion, in particular through the reduction of poverty,
ker je proračun Unije močno sredstvo za reformo, in ker se njegov vpliv lahko poveča, če pritegne dodatne vire zasebnega in javnega financiranja za podporo vlaganj in tako deluje kot katalizator za multipliciranje porabe Unije; ker t.i. načelo „pravičnega povračila“ (juste retour) ni ekonomsko utemeljeno, saj ne upošteva evropske dodane vrednosti, učinkov prelivanja in potrebe po solidarnosti med državami EU,
whereas the Union budget is a powerful agent for reform; and whereas its impact can be magnified if it mobilises additional sources of private and public finance to support investment, acting thus as a catalyst in the multiplying effect of Union spending; whereas the so-called ‘just retour’ principle has no economic rationale, since it does not take due account of European Added Value, spill-over effects and the need for solidarity between EU countries,
ker v skladu s členom 3 Pogodbe o EU trajnostni razvoj Evrope temelji na uravnoteženi gospodarski rasti in stabilnosti cen, izjemno konkurenčnem socialnem tržnem gospodarstvu, katerega cilj sta polna zaposlenost in socialni napredek, ter visoki ravni varstva okolja in izboljšanju njegove kakovosti,
whereas, according to Article 3 TEU, sustainable development of Europe should be based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment,
ker je načelo dobrega finančnega upravljanja eno temeljnih načel za izvajanje proračuna Unije, ker številne države članice v nacionalnih proračunih izvajajo zahtevne fiskalne prilagoditve, in ker je dobro finančno upravljanje – učinkovito, uspešno in ekonomično – vse pomembnejše na področju javne porabe tako na ravni Unije kot tudi na ravni držav članic,
whereas the principle of sound financial management is one of the basic principles for the implementation of the Union budget; and whereas many Member States are making difficult fiscal adjustments to their national budgets; and whereas sound financial management -efficiency, effectiveness, economy- have become increasingly important in public spending, both at Union and Member State levels,
ker so se predpisi za periodično prilagajanje programov odhodkov spremembam potreb in okoliščin izkazali za nezadostne in ker je zapletena narava predpisov in pravil eden od razlogov za nezadostno uspešnost sistemov upravljanja in nadzora,
whereas the provisions for the periodic adjustment of expenditure programmes to changing needs and circumstances have been insufficient; and whereas the complex nature of regulations and rules has been one of the reasons for underperforming management and control systems,
ker so prva štiri leta obstoječega večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013 jasno pokazala meje zmogljivosti finančnega okvira pri odzivanju na nova dogajanja in nove prednostne naloge brez ogrožanja obstoječih; ker se obstoječi večletni finančni okvir ni bil sposoben hitro odzvati na nove zaveze, kot so Galileo, mednarodni termonuklearni poskusni reaktor, instrument za hrano ali evropski načrt za oživitev gospodarstva,
whereas the first four years of the current 2007-2013 MFF have clearly illustrated the limits of the capacity of the financial framework to accommodate new developments and priorities without jeopardising existing ones; and whereas the current MFF has been incapable of responding rapidly to new commitments such as Galileo, ITER, the Food Facility or the European Economic Recovery Plan,
ker naj bi uvedba vira na podlagi BND v sistem financiranja EU leta 1988 le začasno dopolnila nižja lastna sredstva, vendar je bila njegova uporaba podaljšana in z leti še okrepljena, tako da je danes glavna sestavina proračunskih virov EU; ker je ta prevlada okrepila težnjo držav članic, da izračunavajo svojo neto bilanco, posledica tega pa so številni rabati, popravki, izvzetja in kompenzacije, zaradi česar je trenutni sistem lastnih sredstev pretirano zapleten, nepregleden, nezadostno povezan z obstoječimi politikami Unije ter nepravičen, zato ni sposoben zagotoviti preglednega in učinkovitega financiranja politik EU v evropskem interesu, poleg tega pa je povsem nerazumljiv evropskim državljanom,
whereas the introduction of the GNI resource in 1988 in the EU financing system was supposed to temporarily complement a decrease in own resources, but was prolonged and reinforced over the years and is today the main component of EU budgetary resources; whereas this predominance has emphasized Member States' tendency to calculate their net balance, the consequence of which is a series of rebates, corrections, exemptions and compensations which renders the current system of own resources excessively complex, opaque, with insufficient links to existing Union policies and lacks fairness and is therefore incapable to ensure a transparent and efficient financing of Union policies in the European interest, and is finally totally incomprehensible to the European citizens,