natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker prinaša vseevropski pristop k boju proti kaznivim dejanjem in goljufijam, zlasti v zvezi z ohranjanjem celovitosti športa ter varstvom igralcev in potrošnikov, znatno dodano vrednost;
whereas the value added by a pan-European approach to combating crime and fraud, in particular when it comes to preserving the integrity of sport and protecting gamblers and consumers, is considerable,
ker so bile spletne igre na srečo izvzete iz direktiv o elektronskem poslovanju, o storitvah in o pravicah potrošnikov, čeprav člen 56 PDEU zagotavlja svobodo opravljanja storitev;
whereas Article 56 TFEU guarantees the freedom to provide services but whereas, as a consequence of its particular nature, online gambling was exempted from the E-Commerce, Services and Consumer Rights Directives,
ker ostaja pravna negotovost v zvezi s številnimi drugimi vprašanji, ki jih je mogoče rešiti le na politični ravni, čeprav je Sodišče razjasnilo številna pomembna pravna vprašanja na področju spletnih iger na srečo v EU; ker so se zaradi te pravne negotovosti znatno povečale razpoložljivost nezakonitih ponudb iger na srečo in z njimi povezane velike nevarnosti;
whereas, while the Court of Justice has clarified a number of important legal questions concerning online gambling in the EU, legal uncertainty remains with regard to a number of other questions, which can only be solved at the political level; whereas this legal uncertainty has led to a significant increase in the availability of illegal gambling offers and the high risks associated with them;
ker lahko pomenijo spletne igre na srečo, če niso ustrezno pravno urejene, večjo nevarnost zasvojenosti kot običajne igre na srečo v fizičnem svetu, med drugim tudi zato, ker so lažje dostopne in družbenega nadzora nad njimi ni;
whereas online gambling, if not properly regulated, may involve a greater risk of addiction than traditional physical, location-based gambling, owing inter alia to increased ease of access and the absence of social control,
ker je treba potrošnike poučiti o možni škodljivosti spletnih iger na srečo in jih zaščititi pred nevarnostmi na tem področju, zlasti pred zasvojenostjo, goljufijami, prevarami in mladoletniških igranjem na srečo;
whereas consumers must be educated about the potential harm of online gambling and protected against dangers in this area, especially addiction, fraud, scams and underage gambling,
ker so igre na srečo pomemben vir prihodkov, ki jih večina držav članic nameni za javno koristne in dobrodelne namene, na primer za šport;
whereas gambling represents a considerable source of revenue, which most Member States channel to publicly beneficial and charitable purposes such as sport,
ker je treba brezpogojno zagotoviti celovitost športa, tako da se okrepi boj proti korupciji in vnaprej dogovorjenim izidom tekmovanj;
whereas it is essential to ensure the integrity of sport by stepping up the fight against corruption and match fixing,
ker je za doseganje teh ciljev nujno uvesti mehanizme za nadzor športnih tekmovanj in finančnih tokov ter skupne nadzorne mehanizme na ravni EU;
whereas, in order to achieve these objectives, it is essential to introduce mechanisms for scrutinising sports competitions and financial flows, along with common supervisory mechanisms at the EU level,
ker je ključnega pomena tudi mednarodno sodelovanje med vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi (institucijami, športnimi zvezami in ponudniki športnih stav), da bi zbrali zglede dobre prakse;
whereas international-level cooperation among all stakeholders (institutions, sports federations and betting operators) is also crucial with a view to pooling good practices,
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija prevzela pobudo in začela javno posvetovanje v zvezi z zeleno knjigo o spletnih stavah in igrah na srečo, ki bo spodbudilo pragmatičen in stvaren razmislek o prihodnosti te panoge v Evropi;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has taken the initiative of launching public consultation in connection with its Green Paper on online betting and gambling, which will facilitate pragmatic and realistic consideration of the future of this sector in Europe;
pozdravlja pojasnilo Komisije, da cilj političnega procesa, ki se je začel z zeleno knjigo, nikakor ni deregulacija/liberalizacija spletnih iger na srečo;
Welcomes the Commission's clarification of the fact that the political process initiated by means of the Green Paper is in no way aimed at deregulating/liberalising online gambling;
opozarja na vse večji gospodarski pomen panoge spletnih iger na srečo, saj so letni prihodki iz tega vira v letu 2008 presegli 6 milijard EUR, kar pomeni 45 % svetovnega trga; se strinja s Sodiščem Evropske unije, da je to posebna gospodarska dejavnost; opozarja, da je ta rast povzročila tudi višje socialne stroške zaradi kompulzivnega igranja na srečo in nezakonite prakse;
Recalls the growing economic importance of the online gambling industry, the take from which was over EUR 6 billion, or 45% of the world market, in 2008; agrees with the Court of Justice of the European Union that this is an economic activity with specific characteristics; recalls that this growth also entails an increased social cost from compulsive gambling and illegal practices;
meni, da bi morala učinkovita pravna ureditev panoge iger na srečo na spletu zlasti:
Takes the view that efficient regulation of the online gambling sector should in particular:
usmerjati naravno nagnjenje prebivalstva do igranja iger na srečo,
channel the natural gaming instinct of the population,
boriti se proti nezakoniti panogi iger na srečo,
combat the illegal gambling sector,
zagotavljati učinkovito varstvo igralcev ob posebni pozornosti do ranljivih skupin, zlasti mladine,
guarantee effective protection for gamblers, with specific attention to vulnerable groups, in particular young people,
preprečiti nevarnost zasvojenosti z igrami na srečo in
preclude risks of gambling addiction, and
zagotoviti, da se igre na srečo izvajajo zakonito, pošteno, odgovorno in pregledno,
ensure that gambling is proper, fair, responsible and transparent,
zagotoviti, da se spodbudijo posebni ukrepi za zagotavljanje celovitosti športnih tekmovanj,
ensure that specific measures are promoted to guarantee the integrity of sporting competition,
zagotavljati, da se znaten del javnih prihodkov iz iger na srečo uporabi za spodbujanje javnih dejavnosti, dejavnosti za skupno dobro ali dobrodelnih dejavnosti in
ensure that a considerable proportion of government revenue from gambling is used for publicly beneficial and charitable purposes, and
zagotoviti, da pri igrah na srečo ne prihaja do kaznivih dejanj, goljufij in katere koli oblike pranja denarja;
ensure that gaming is kept free from crime, fraud and any form of money laundering;
meni, da lahko taka ureditev zagotovi privlačnost športnih tekmovanj za potrošnike in javnost ter ohrani verodostojnost športnih rezultatov in ugled športnih tekmovanj;
Sees such regulation as having the potential to ensure that sports competitions are attractive to consumers and to the public, that sports results remain credible and that the competitions retain their prestige;
poudarja stališče Sodišča Evropske unije Sodba Sodišča v zadevi C-46/08, Carmen Media, ZOdl.
Underscores the standpoint of the European Court of Justice Carmen Media 2010 (C-46/08).
poudarja, da mora vsakršno pravno urejanje panoge iger na srečo upoštevati in se opirati na načelo subidiarnosti, saj so različni običaji ter kultura v državah članicah, ki jih je treba razumeti kot načelo „aktivne subsidiarnosti“, ki pomeni sodelovanje med nacionalnimi upravnimi organi; zato meni, da pomeni to načelo skladnost s pravili mednarodnega trga, če se jih lahko uporablja v skladu s sodbami Evropskega sodišča, ki zadevajo igre na srečo;
Emphasises that any regulation of the gambling sector is subject to, and must be underpinned by, the subsidiarity principle, given the different traditions and cultures in the Member States, which must be understood as ‘active subsidiarity’, entailing cooperation among the national administrations; considers, however, that this principle implies compliance with the rules of the internal market in so far as applicable in accordance with the ruling by the ECJ concerning gambling;
meni, da je potrebna privlačna, dobro regulirana ponudba storitev iger na srečo tako na spletu kot prek običajnih kanalov iger na srečo v fizičnem prostoru, da potrošniki ne bi izbirali ponudnikov, ki ne izpolnjujejo nacionalnih zahtev za licenciranje;
Is of the opinion that an attractive, well regulated provision of gambling services, both on the Internet and via traditional physical gambling channels, is necessary to ensure that consumers do not use operators which do not fulfil national licensing requirements;
zato zavrača evropski pravni akt o enotni ureditvi celotne panoge iger na srečo, kljub temu pa meni, da bi usklajen evropski pristop v kombinaciji z nacionalno ureditvijo glede na čezmejnost spletnih storitev na srečo na nekaterih področjih prinesel jasno dodano vrednost;
Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire gambling sector, but nonetheless takes the view that, in some areas there would be clear added value from a coordinated European approach, in addition to national regulation, given the cross-border nature of online gambling services;
priznava pravico držav članic, da same uredijo panogo iger na srečo, pri čemer morajo spoštovati temeljni načeli Pogodbe o EU, tj. načeli nediskriminacije in sorazmernosti; v zvezi s tem spoštuje odločitev nekaterih držav članic, da prepovejo vse ali nekatere vrste spletnih iger na srečo, da bi ohranile državni monopol v tej panogi, v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča, če je njihov pristop dosleden;
Recognises the Member States' discretion in determining how gambling is organised, while observing the basic EU Treaty principles of non-discrimination and proportionality; respects in this context the decision by a number of Member States to ban all or certain types of online gambling or to maintain government monopolies on that sector, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, as long as they adopt a coherent approach;
poudarja, da je Sodišče Evropske unije v številnih sodbah odločilo, da je dodelitev izključnih pravic enemu samemu ponudniku pod strogim nadzorom javnih organov lahko jamstvo za boljše varstvo potrošnikov pred goljufijami in učinkovitejši boj proti kaznivim dejanjem v panogi spletnih iger na srečo;
Points out that the European Court of Justice has accepted in a number of rulings that granting exclusive rights to a single operator subject to tight public-authority control may be a means of improving protection of consumers against fraud and combating crime in the online gambling sector more effectively;
poudarja, da gre pri spletnih igrah na srečo za gospodarsko dejavnost posebne vrste, za katero pravila notranjega trga glede svobode ustanavljanja in zagotavljanja storitev ne morejo veljati brez omejitev; priznava dosledno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije, v kateri je poudarjeno, da je treba nadzor na nacionalni ravni uvesti in izvajati na dosleden, sorazmeren in nediskriminatoren način;
Points out that online gambling is a special kind of economic activity, to which internal market rules, namely freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, cannot fully apply; recognises, however, the consistent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union which emphasises that national controls should be enacted and applied in a consistent, proportionate and non-discriminatory manner;
poudarja, da bi na eni strani morali ponudniki spletnih iger na srečo vedno spoštovati nacionalno zakonodajo držav, v katerih se take igre izvajajo, na drugi pa bi države članice morale ohraniti pravico, da uvedejo ukrepe za obravnavanje nezakonitih spletnih iger na srečo, s čimer bi zagotovili izvajanje nacionalne zakonodaje in nezakonitim ponudnikom preprečili dostop do trga;
Stresses, on the one hand, that providers of online gambling should in all cases respect the national laws of the countries in which those games operate and, on the other hand, that Member States should retain the right to impose measures to address illegal online gambling in order to implement national legislation and exclude illegal providers from market access;
meni, da se v panogi iger na srečo ne more uporabljati načelo vzajemnega priznavanja licenc, kljub temu pa v skladu z načeli notranjega trga vztraja, da morajo države članice, ki odprejo panogo spletnih iger na srečo za konkurenco za vse ali nekatere vrste spletnih iger na srečo, zagotoviti preglednost in omogočiti nediskriminativno konkurenco; v zvezi s tem priporoča državam članicam, da uvedejo model licenciranja, v skladu s katerim bo lahko zaprosil za licenco vsak evropski ponudnik iger na srečo, ki izpolnjuje pogoje, ki so jih določile države članice; v tistih državah članicah, ki so uvedle sistem licenciranja, bi lahko vzpostavili postopke za vložitev zahtevka za licenco, ki zmanjšujejo upravne obremenitve, da bi se izognili nepotrebnemu podvajanju zahtev in kontrol, ki se izvajajo v drugih državah članicah, pri tem pa zagotovili ključno vlogo regulativnega organa v državi članici, v kateri je bila zahteva vložena; zato meni, da je treba na podlagi tesnejšega upravnega sodelovanja okrepiti medsebojno zaupanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi; poleg tega spoštuje odločitev nekaterih držav članic, da določijo število ponudnikov, vrste in obseg ponujenih iger, da bi zaščitile potrošnike in preprečile kazniva dejanja, pod pogojem da so te omejitve sorazmerne in upoštevajo skrb za omejitev dejavnosti v tej panogi na dosleden in sistematičen način;
Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences in the gambling sector does not apply, but nevertheless, in keeping with internal market principles, insists, that Member States which open up the online gambling sector to competition for all or certain types of online gambling must ensure transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible; suggests, in this instance, that Member States introduce a licensing model which makes it possible for European gambling providers meeting the conditions imposed by the host Member State to apply for a licence; licence application procedures, which reduce administrative burdens by avoiding the unnecessary duplication of requirements and controls carried out in other Member States, could be set up in those Member States that have implemented a licensing system, while ensuring the pre-eminent role of the regulator in the Member State in which the application has been submitted; takes the view, therefore, that mutual confidence among national regulators needs to be enhanced through closer administrative cooperation; respects, furthermore, the decision of some Member States to determine the number of operators, types and quantities of games on offer, in order to protect consumers and prevent crime, on condition that those restrictions are proportionate and reflect a concern to limit activities in that sector in a consistent and systematic manner;
poziva Komisijo, naj v skladu z načelom „aktivne subsidiarnosti“ preuči vsa možna sredstva ali ukrepe na ravni EU, namenjene varstvu ranljivih potrošnikov, preprečevanju zasvojenosti in boju proti nezakonitim ponudnikom na področju iger na srečo, tudi prek formaliziranega sodelovanja med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi, skupnih standardov za ponudnike ali okvirne direktive; meni, da bi lahko bil prvi korak vseevropski kodeks ravnanja za spletne igre na srečo, ki bi ga sprejeli regulativni organi in ponudniki;
Calls on the Commission to explore – in keeping with the principle of ‘active subsidiarity’ – all possible tools or measures at the EU level designed to protect vulnerable consumers, prevent addiction and combat illegal operators in the field of gambling, including formalised cooperation between national regulators, common standards for operators or a framework directive; is of the opinion that a pan-European code of conduct for online gambling agreed between regulators and operators could be a first step;
meni, da mora vseevropski kodeks ravnanja na področju spletnih iger na srečo obravnavati pravice in obveznosti ponudnika storitve in potrošnika; meni, da bi moral ta kodeks spodbujati odgovorno igranje na srečo, zagotavljati visoko raven varstva igralcev, zlasti mladoletnih in drugih ranljivih oseb, podpirati mehanizme za boj proti kibernetskemu kriminalu, goljufijam in zavajajočemu oglaševanju na ravni EU ter na nacionalni ravni in določiti okvir načel in pravil za enako varstvo potrošnikov povsod v EU;
Takes the view that a pan-European code of conduct for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer; considers that this code of conduct should help to ensure responsible gaming, a high level of protection for players, particularly in the case of minors and other vulnerable persons, support mechanisms both at EU and national level that fight cyber crime, fraud and misleading advertisement and ultimately provide a framework of principles and rules which ensures that consumers are protected evenly across the EU;
poudarja, da bi si morale države članice bolj prizadevati, da bi nezakonitim ponudnikom iger na srečo preprečile ponujanje storitev na spletu, na primer z oblikovanjem črnega seznama nezakonitih ponudnikov iger na srečo; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost predloga o pravno zavezujočih instrumentih, ki bi obvezovali banke, izdajatelje kreditnih kartic in udeležence v drugih plačilnih sistemih v EU, da na podlagi nacionalnih črnih seznamov blokirajo transakcije med svojimi strankami ter ponudniki iger na srečo, ki nimajo licence na njihovem območju sodne pristojnosti, ne da bi ovirali zakonite transakcije;
Stresses that more action should be taken by Member States to prevent illegal gambling providers from offering their services online, for example by blacklisting illegal gambling providers; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of proposing a legally binding instruments obliging banks, credit card issuers and other payment system participants in the EU to block, on the basis of national black lists, transactions between their clients and gambling providers that are not licensed in their jurisdiction, without hindering legitimate transactions;
spoštuje pravico držav članic do uporabe številnih različnih represivnih ukrepov proti nezakonitim ponudbam spletnih storitev iger na srečo; podpira – da bi se povečala učinkovitost boja proti nezakonitim spletnim ponudbam iger na srečo – uvedbo regulativnega načela, v skladu s katerim lahko družba, ki ponuja storitve iger na srečo, deluje (ali se poteguje za zahtevano nacionalno licenco) v državi članici le, če ne posluje v nasprotju z zakonodajo katere koli druge države članice EU;
Respects the right of the Member States to draw on a wide variety of repressive measures against illegal online gambling offers; supports, in order to increase the efficiency of the fight against illegal online gambling offers, the introduction of a regulatory principle whereby a gambling company can only operate (or bid for the required national licence) in one Member State if it does not operate in contravention of the law in any other EU Member State;
poziva Komisijo kot varuha pogodb in države članice, naj še naprej učinkovito nadzirajo spoštovanje prava EU;
Calls on the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, and the Member States to continue to carry out effective checks on compliance with EU law;
ugotavlja, da bi bilo od leta 2008 mogoče doseči večji napredek glede odprtih primerov kršitev in da Sodišču EU doslej ni bila predložena pritožba zoper nobeno državo članico; poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej raziskuje morebitne neskladnosti v zakonodaji držav članic na področju iger na srečo (na spletu in zunaj njega) s PDEU in – po potrebi – nadaljuje postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki potekajo od leta 2008, da bi zagotovila to skladnost s PDEU; opominja Komisijo kot varuha pogodb na njeno nalogo, da mora po prejetju pritožb o kršitvi svoboščin, določenih v pogodbah, hitro ukrepati;
Notes the fact that more progress could have been made on pending infringement cases since 2008 and that no Member State has ever been referred to the European Court of Justice; urges the Commission to continue its investigation of the possible inconsistencies of Member States gambling legislation (offline and online) with the TFEU and – if necessary – to pursue those infringement proceedings that have been pending since 2008 in order to ensure such consistency; reminds the Commission, as ‘guardian of the Treaties’, of its duty to act swiftly upon receipt of complaints about violations of the freedoms enshrined in the Treaties;
poziva k občutni širitvi sodelovanja med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi z zadostnimi pristojnostmi, katerih delo usklajuje Evropska komisija, da bi se razvili skupni standardi in skupaj ukrepalo proti ponudnikom spletnih iger na srečo, ki delujejo brez potrebnih nacionalnih licenc; nacionalne samostojne rešitve so zlasti neučinkovite kot sredstvo identificiranja igralcev na srečo, ki so na črnem seznamu, pri boju proti pranju denarja, goljufijam pri stavah in drugih oblikah organiziranega kriminala; v zvezi s tem meni, da je treba za učinkovitejše upravno sodelovanje v vsaki državi članici nujno ustanoviti regulativni organ z ustreznimi pooblastili; ugotavlja, da bi lahko bil informacijski sistem za notranji trg podlaga za učinkovitejše sodelovanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi; je seznanjen s pobudami nacionalnih regulativnih organov, da bi tesneje sodelovali, na primer omrežjem Foruma evropskih regulatorjev igralništva (GREF) in evropsko regulativno platformo; poziva k tesnejšemu sodelovanju in boljšemu usklajevanju med državami članicami EU ter Europolom in Eurojustom na področju boja proti nezakonitemu igranju na srečo, goljufijam, pranju denarja in drugim finančnim kaznivim dejanjem na področju spletnih iger na srečo;
Calls for cooperation among national regulatory bodies to be considerably expanded, giving them a sufficient remit, with the Commission as coordinator, to develop common standards and take joint action against online gambling operators which operate without the required national licence; states that, in particular as a means of identifying blacklisted gamblers and combating money laundering, betting fraud and other organised crime, national standalone solutions are not successful; in this context; considers the establishment of a regulator with suitable powers in each Member State to be a necessary step towards more effective regulatory cooperation; states that the Internal Market Information System could serve as the basis for more effective cooperation among national regulatory bodies; takes note of initiatives by national regulators to work together more closely, such as the Gaming Regulators European Forum (GREF) network and the European Regulatory Platform; calls for closer cooperation and better coordination among EU Member States, Europol and Eurojust in the fight against illegal gambling, fraud, money laundering and other financial crimes in the area of online gambling;