natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opominja, da bi bila bela knjiga o teritorialni koheziji, ki bi sledila zeleni knjigi, instrument, s katerim bi pravočasno pojasnili, kako prek upravljanja na več ravneh izvajati teritorialno kohezijo v prihodnji regionalni politiki, in hkrati zagotovili snov za razpravo o naslednjem zakonodajnem svežnju;
Recalls that a White Paper on territorial cohesion as a follow-up to the Green Paper would represent a timely instrument to clarify how to implement territorial cohesion through multi-level governance in the future regional policy and provide material for the debate on the next legislative package;
ugotavlja, da pogoji za čezmejno sodelovanje v okviru evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta niso primerni za njegov razvoj; zato priporoča boljše usklajevanje med različnimi generalnimi direktorati znotraj Evropske komisije; je prepričan o nujnosti ponovnega vključevanja programov čezmejnega sodelovanja v okviru evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta v cilj „teritorialno sodelovanje“ v okviru kohezijske politike;
States that the conditions for cross-border cooperation in the ENPI are not sufficient for its appropriate development; advocates, therefore, more effective coordination between the various Commission directorates-general concerned; is convinced of the ultimate necessity to reintegrate the ENPI cross-border cooperation programmes into the Territorial Cooperation Objective of cohesion policy;
meni, da so EZTS edinstven in dragocen instrument za teritorialno upravljanje, ki ustreza potrebam po strukturiranem sodelovanju na področju financ, pravnega statusa in upravljanja na več ravneh; opominja, da je treba instrument EZTS spodbujati kot orodje za vzpostavitev sistemov čezmejnega upravljanja in za zagotavljanje pripadnosti različnim politikam na regionalni in lokalni ravni; poudarja tudi njihovo ključno vlogo pri prispevanju k uspešnemu razvoju izvajanja modela upravljanja na več ravneh;
Considers that EGTCs represent a unique, highly valuable territorial governance instrument which meets a need for structured cooperation with reference to financing, the legal status of projects and multi-level governance; recalls that the instrument of EGTC must be promoted as a tool to set up systems of cross-border governance, ensuring the ownership of the different policies at regional and local level; also stresses their key role in contributing to the successful implementation of a multi-level governance model;
poudarja, da EZTS lahko prispevajo ne le k teritorialni koheziji, temveč tudi k socialni koheziji; prav tako poudarja, da ima ta instrument najboljše možnosti, da zbliža različne kulturne in jezikovne skupnosti, spodbuja miroljubno sobivanje v raznoliki Evropi in prispeva k večji prepoznavnosti evropske dodane vrednosti med državljani;
Highlights the fact that EGTCs can contribute not only to territorial cohesion but also to social cohesion: points out that this instrument has the best capacity to bring the different cultural and linguistic communities closer to each other, promote peaceful coexistence in a diverse Europe and make European added value visible to the citizen;
priporoča prvo oceno obstoječih EZTS, da se iz prvih izkušenj česa naučimo;
Recommends that a first assessment of the EGTCs in place be carried out, with a view to learning from these initial experiences;
meni pa, da je treba olajšati njihovo ustanavljanje, ter poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predstavi predloge sprememb k Uredbi št.°1082/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o EZTS ob upoštevanju težav, ki so jih opredelili lokalni in regionalni organi in že ustanovljena združenja, ter na podlagi opravljenega dela Odbora regij, da bi se:
Believes, however, that their establishment must be facilitated and calls on the Commission to propose amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on EGTCs without delay, taking due account of the problems identified by the local and regional authorities and the groupings already in place and on the basis of work undertaken by the Committee of the Regions, with a view to:
pojasnil status EZTS v pravnih sistemih držav članic, da bi lahko v zvezi s tem dosegli ustrezno pravno usklajenost;
clarifying the status of EGTC under the legal systems of the Member States in order to achieve an appropriate legal alignment in this respect,
omogočilo ustanavljanje EZTS med zainteresiranimi stranmi v državi članici in tretji državi;
allowing EGTCs to be established by stakeholders based in a Member State and in a third country,
preoblikoval člen 4(3), da bi se strogo spoštoval trimesečni rok za obravnavo vlog za ustanovitev EZTS;
redrafting Article 4(3) to ensure stricter compliance with the three-month deadline for the processing of applications to set up an EGTC,
poenostavili kadrovski predpisi;
simplifying the laws governing staffing,
zagotovilo, da davčna ureditev za EZTS ne bi bila slabša kot za druge pravne statuse v okviru izvajanja projektov ali programov sodelovanja;
ensuring that the tax rules for EGTCs are no less favourable than other legal arrangements governing the implementation of cooperation projects or programmes;
spodbuja dodeljevanje splošnih subvencij EZTS, ki predlagajo projekt, skladen s cilji in strategijami zadevnih programov sodelovanja, na podlagi skupnih strategij čezmejnega razvoja, da bodo lahko neposredno upravljala s sredstvi iz strukturnih skladov, in programov, ter poziva, naj se v uredbah o drugih evropskih skladih bolj upošteva večnacionalna in večstranska narava EZTS ter naj se jim olajša dostop do drugih finančnih virov;
Calls for the allocation of global grants to EGTCs with projects that reflect the objectives and strategies of the relevant cooperation programmes, on the basis of common cross-border development strategies, in order to enable them to directly manage Structural Fund appropriations, and programmes, as well as for the multinational and multilateral nature of EGTCs to be better reflected in regulations governing the other European funds, with a view to improving their access to other sources of financing;
se veseli, da bo Odbor regij vzpostavil evropsko platformo EZTS, namenjeno izmenjavi izkušenj, izrabi dobrih praks in tehnični podpori EZTS;
Welcomes the launch by the Committee of the Regions of the European EGTC Platform, which aims to facilitate the exchange of experiences, the pooling of best practices and the provision of technical support for EGTCs;
meni, da so čezmejna EZTS odlična priložnost, da na teh ozemljih z vključevanjem evropskih državljanov zgradimo Evropo; poziva čezmejna EZTS, naj po potrebi ustanovijo in vodijo „čezmejni forum civilne družbe“ ter podpirajo čezmejne državljanske pobude;
Takes the view that cross-border EGTCs offer an excellent opportunity to build Europe at territorial level with the involvement of EU citizens; calls on cross-border EGTCs to launch and run when appropriate a ‘cross-border civil society forum’ and to support cross-border citizens' initiatives;
meni, da je izvajanje programov za teritorialno sodelovanje še vedno prezapleteno in da cilj 3 potrebuje svoja pravila, da bi odražal svoj v osnovi mednarodni značaj svojih dejavnosti; meni, da je trenutno treba v izvajanje programov vključiti preveč različnih upravnih organov, in zato v zvezi s tem poziva k bistveni poenostavitvi;
Believes that the implementation of territorial cooperation programmes remains overly complicated and considers that Objective 3 needs a separate regulation to reflect the inherently international character of its activities; believes that at present too many different administrative authorities have to be involved in implementing programmes and therefore calls for significant simplification in this respect;
poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga posebne ukrepe za poenostavitev pravil revizije in nadzora, ob upoštevanju načela „en upravni organ na program“ kot vodila, predvidi bolj sistematično določitev pavšala za stroške in financiranje v fiksnem znesku za male projekte, opredeli natančnejša pravila EU za upravičenost do sredstev, zagotovi večjo prožnost pri uporabi samodejnega prenehanja prevzetih obveznosti, okrepi tehnično pomoč, da se bodo lahko upravni organi bolj osredotočili na zagon, strateško podporo in rezultate projektov in ne le na upravljanje in administrativno ustreznost kandidatur;
Invites the Commission to propose specific measures which simplify rules on auditing and control, with ‘one management authority per programme’ as a guiding principle, authorise more systematic standard-rate costing and the funding of small projects by means of fixed amounts, lay down more detailed EU rules on eligibility for funding, make for greater flexibility in the implementation of automatic decommitments, increase technical assistance with a view to ensuring that the management bodies concentrate more on the launching and strategic support of projects and delivery of results, rather than merely on management and whether applications comply with administrative rules;
poziva države članice, naj poenostavijo nacionalne predpise, ki pogosto prinašajo dodatno upravno breme, ki ga zakonodaja Skupnosti ne zahteva;
Calls on the Member States to simplify their national provisions, which very often add administrative burden not required by the Community rules;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej pojasni podrobnosti načela pogojenosti, ki je predvideno za teritorialno sodelovanje; meni, da če naj ta pogojenost ustvari ugodno okolje za boljšo in učinkovitejšo uporabo sredstev iz skladov, ne sme dodatno zaplesti izvajanja na škodo upravljavcev in upravičencev programov;
Calls on the Commission to clarify, as soon as possible, the provisions governing the principle of conditionality intended for territorial cooperation; considers that, if this conditionality is to create the conditions for better and more effective use of funds, it must not further complicate implementation, to the detriment of programme managers and beneficiaries;
poudarja, da si je treba prizadevati za razširitev in poenostavitev, da bo lažje privabiti subjekte iz zasebnega sektorja; priporoča oblikovanje finančnih sistemov po vzoru pobud JEREMIE in JESSICA za poenostavitev čezmejnih projektov, ki bodo nosilci gospodarskega razvoja, udeležbe subjektov iz zasebnega sektorja ter sklepanja javno-zasebnih partnerstev;
Stresses, furthermore, that arrangements for involving private stakeholders must be broadened and simplified; recommends setting up financial engineering systems, along the lines of the JEREMIE and JESSICA initiatives, to facilitate cross-border projects which are vectors of economic development, the participation of private stakeholders and the establishment of public-private partnerships;
obžaluje, ker teritorialno sodelovanje ni dovolj znano na ravni nacionalnih in lokalnih uprav ter med državljani, zato poziva k bolj učinkovitemu obveščanju o zaključenih projektih;
Deplores the low profile of territorial cooperation, in the eyes of both national and local authorities and the general public, and therefore calls for more effective communication on completed projects;
zahteva, naj Komisija razmisli o možnostih za povečanje prepoznavnosti EZTS in njihovega delovanja med akterji teritorialnega sodelovanja in državljani;
Asks the Commission to come up with ways to raise the profile of EGTCs and their activities among territorial cooperation stakeholders and the general public;
meni, da je treba zgodovinsko pogojeno jezikovno in kulturno bližino obmejnih regij različnih držav članic ceniti in uporabiti za krepitev čezmejnega sodelovanja;
Considers that the close cultural and linguistic links between border regions in different Member States, a legacy of history, must be exploited in order to boost cross-border cooperation;
meni, da bi okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju izobraževanja in kulture prispevalo k uresničevanju ciljev pametne in vključujoče rasti strategije Evropa 2020 in posledično zagotovilo višjo raven udeležbe državljanov in nevladnih organizacij ter prispevalo k večji prepoznavnosti teritorialnega sodelovanja in odpravljanju meja v glavah, ki ovirajo zbliževanje državljanov;
Considers that, by helping to fulfil the Europe 2020 strategy's objective of intelligent and inclusive growth, increased cooperation on education and culture would raise the level of participation of citizens and NGOs as well as contribute to the raising of the profile of territorial cooperation and breaking down the ‘mental borders’ that still set citizens apart from one another;
poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju med upravnimi organi in obstoječimi čezmejnimi institucijami, kot so evroregije, ob izvajanju čezmejnih programov, da bi zagotovili projekte visoke kakovosti, ki bodo pregledni in blizu državljanom;
Calls for better coordination between managing authorities and already existing cross-border institutions like Euroregions during the implementation of cross-border programmes so as to guarantee for projects a high level of quality, transparency and closeness to the citizen;
poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju komunikacije med vsemi akterji, vključenimi v proces izvajanja teritorialnega sodelovanja; predlaga, naj vsi programi iz istega sklopa dobijo enoten znak za vizualno prepoznavnost oz. logotip (naj se na primer ponovno uvede prepoznavna oznaka INTERREG) v povezavi z logotipom vsakega posameznega programa (morda standardizirane velikosti), ter poziva Komisijo, naj na začetku prihodnjega programskega obdobja v obmejnih regijah predlaga široko medijsko informativno kampanjo o prednostih in dosežkih teritorialnega sodelovanja;
Asks for more effective coordination of communication between all stakeholders involved in the process of implementing territorial cooperation initiatives, suggests that all programmes in the same component should be recognisable by their use of a single identifiable logo (e.g. reinstatement of the well-recognised ‘INTERREG’ tag) in tandem with each programme's logo (perhaps of a standardised visual size), and invites the Commission, by the start of the next programming period, to come up with a large-scale media and awareness-raising campaign for border regions on the benefits and achievements of territorial cooperation;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. junija 2011 o trenutnem stanju in prihodnji sinergiji ESRR in drugih strukturnih skladov za večjo učinkovitost ( 2010/2160(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 23 June 2011 on the state of play and future synergies for increased effectiveness between the ERDF and other structural funds ( 2010/2160(INI) )
ob upoštevanju prvega odstavka člena 174 in prvega odstavka člena 175 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
having regard to Article 174, first paragraph, and Article 175, first paragraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
, zlasti člena 9(4) te uredbe,
, and in particular Article 9(4) thereof,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2009 o dopolnjevanju in usklajevanju kohezijske politike z ukrepi za razvoj podeželja UL C 117 E, 6.5.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2009 on complementarities and coordination of cohesion policy with rural development measures OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2009 o zeleni knjigi o teritorialni koheziji in napredku razprave o prihodnji reformi kohezijske politike UL C 117 E, 6.5..2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2009 on the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion and the state of debate on the future reform of cohesion policy OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o uresničevanju sinergij med sredstvi za raziskave in inovacije iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj ter Sedmim okvirnim programom za raziskave in razvoj v mestih in regijah ter državah članicah in Uniji .UL C 161 E, 31.5.2011, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on the implementation of the synergies of research and innovation earmarked funds in Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 concerning the European Fund of Regional Development and the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development in cities and regions as well as in the Member States and the Union OJ C 161 E, 31.5.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o prispevku kohezijske politike k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in ciljev strategije EU 2020 .UL C 161 E, 31.5.2011, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on the contribution of the Cohesion policy to the achievement of Lisbon and the EU 2020 objectives OJ C 161 E, 31.5.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o uresničitvi enotnega trga za potrošnike in državljane UL C 161 E, 31.5.2011, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on delivering a single market to consumers and citizens OJ C 161 E, 31.5.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o kohezijski in regionalni politiki EU po letu 2013 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0356 .
having regard to its resolution of 7 October 2010 on EU cohesion and regional policy after 2013 Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0356 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. decembra 2010 o dobrem upravljanju v regionalni politiki EU Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0468 .
having regard to its resolution of 12 December 2010 on good governance with regard to the EU regional policy Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0468 .
ob upoštevanju 20. letnega poročila Komisije o izvajanju strukturnih skladov (2008) z dne 21. decembra 2009 ( KOM(2009)0617 /2),
having regard to the Commission's 20th annual report on implementation of the structural funds (2008), of 21 December 2009 ( COM(2009)0617 /2),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission of 3 March 2010 on ‘EUROPE 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 31. marca 2010 z naslovom Kohezijska politika: Strateško poročilo o izvajanju programov 2007–2013 za leto 2010 ( KOM(2010)0110 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission of 31 March 2010 on ‘Cohesion policy: Strategic Report 2010 on the implementation of the programmes 2007-2013’ ( COM(2010)0110 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Prispevek regionalne politike k pametni rasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 ( KOM(2010)0553 ),
having regard to the communication form the Commission of 6 October 2010 on ‘Regional Policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020’ ( COM(2010)0553 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. oktobra 2010 o pregledu proračuna EU ( KOM(2010)0700 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission of 19 October 2010 on ‘The EU Budget Review’ ( COM(2010)0700 ),
ob upoštevanju petega poročila Komisije o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji: prihodnost kohezijske politike (peto kohezijsko poročilo) iz novembra 2010,
having regard to the Commission's fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion: the future of cohesion policy (the ‘Fifth Cohesion Report’), of November 2010,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 9. novembra 2010 o sklepih petega poročila o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji ( KOM(2010)0642 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission of 9 November 2010 on the conclusions of the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion ( COM(2010)0642 ),
ob upoštevanju pisma komisarjev za regionalno politiko, za ribištvo in pomorske zadeve, za zaposlovanje, socialne zadeve in vključevanje ter za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja predsedniku Komisije,
having regard to the letter addressed to the President of the Commission by the Commissioners for Regional Policy, for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, and for Agriculture and Rural Development,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj in mnenj Odbora za proračun ter Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A7-0141/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A7-0141/2011 ),
ker je v členu 174 PDEU predvideno, da Unija, da bi pospešila svoj vsesplošni skladni razvoj, razvija in izvaja tiste svoje dejavnosti, ki vodijo h krepitvi njene ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije,
whereas Article 174 TFEU provides that the Union, in order to promote its overall harmonious development, shall develop and pursue its actions leading to the strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion,
ker je v uvodni izjavi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 navedeno, da mora programiranje zagotoviti medsebojno usklajenost skladov in njihovo usklajenost z drugimi obstoječimi finančnimi instrumenti ter z EIB in Evropskim investicijskim skladom (EIS), ter da bi moralo to usklajevanje zajemati tudi pripravo kompleksnih finančnih shem in javno-zasebna partnerstva,
whereas recital 40 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 states that programming should ensure coordination of the funds between themselves and with the other existing financial instruments, the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF), and that such coordination should also cover the preparation of complex financial schemes and public-private partnerships,
ker je Komisija v strategiji Evropa 2020 jamčila, da bo sprožila finančne instrumente EU – med drugim evropske sklade za razvoj podeželja, za programe raziskav in razvoja, za vseevropsko omrežje (TEN), za program za konkurenčnost in inovacije in Evropsko investicijsko banko – kot del dosledne strategije financiranja, ki združuje financiranje EU ter javno in zasebno financiranje na nacionalni ravni v okviru vodilne pobude z naslovom Evropa, gospodarna z viri, za kar je potrebna uskladitev med politikami in instrumenti,
whereas the Commission, in the Europe 2020 strategy, pledged to mobilise the EU financial instruments – namely the rural development and the structural funds, R&D programmes, Trans-European Networks (TENs), the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) and the EIB, among others – as part of a consistent funding strategy, pulling together EU and national public and private funding, in the context of the flagship initiative entitled ‘Resource efficient Europe’, thus reflecting the need for coherence between policies and instruments,
ker se v petem kohezijskem poročilu jasno priznava, da je za dosledno prizadevanje za lokalni razvoj potrebna tesna usklajenost politik na vseh ravneh,
whereas the Fifth Cohesion Report clearly acknowledges that pursuing regional development effectively requires close coordination of public policies at all levels,
ker je Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 14. junija 2010 o strateškem poročilu Komisije o izvajanju programov kohezijske politike za leto 2010 poudaril, „da je treba nadalje izboljšati usklajevanje kohezijske politike ter drugih politik EU in po potrebi nacionalnih politik, da bi bili z boljšim usklajevanjem učinkovitejši pri izpolnjevanju skupnih ciljev“, ter „da imajo en strateški pristop in skupna izvedbena pravila za Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj, Evropski socialni sklad in Kohezijski sklad v splošnem okviru kohezijske politike resnično dodano vrednost“,
whereas the Council, in its conclusions of 14 June 2010 on the Commission's Strategic Report 2010 on the implementation of cohesion policy programmes, stressed ‘the need to further improve the co-ordination of Cohesion policy and other EU and national policies, where necessary in order to increase the effectiveness in delivering common objectives in a common coordinated way’, as well as ‘the real added value generated by one strategic approach and by common implementation rules for the ERDF, the Cohesion Fund and the ESF, within the general framework of the cohesion policy’,