natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je treba vprašanje boljše priprave zakonodaje obravnavati ne le v okviru zakonodajnega programa Komisije, ampak tudi širše glede na stalno izvajanje novih prvin Lizbonske pogodbe, ki vplivajo na zakonodajne postopke,
whereas the issue of smart regulation should be considered not only in the context of the Commission's legislative programme, but also in a wider sense, in connection with the continued implementation of the new features of the Lisbon Treaty that affect legislative procedures,
ker Lizbonska pogodba na novo ureja razmerje moči med evropskimi institucijami in Parlament v procesu sprejemanja zakonodaje po rednem zakonodajnem postopku obravnava kot enakovreden Svetu,
whereas the Lisbon Treaty has sought to redress the balance of powers between the European institutions, and considers Parliament to be equal with the Council in lawmaking under the ordinary legislative procedure,
ker so nacionalni parlamenti po sprejetju Lizbonske pogodbe formalno vključeni v nadzor uporabe načela subsidiarnosti in so do zdaj poslali že več kot 300 prispevkov;
whereas, following the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, national parliaments are now formally involved in monitoring the application of the principle of subsidiarity, with over 300 submissions received so far,
ker je bistvenega pomena, da se pri pripravi zakonodajnih aktov, vključno z ocenami učinka, opravijo posvetovanja z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti z malimi in srednjimi podjetji in ustreznimi interesnimi skupinami,
whereas consultations with all interested parties, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and other relevant stakeholders, are of fundamental importance in the preparation of draft legislation, including impact assessments,
ker se od leta 2005 izvaja poseben program za zmanjševanje upravnih bremen, izhajajočih iz zakonodaje Evropske unije, s ciljem zmanjšati bremena za 25 % do leta 2012, kar bi ustrezalo 1,4 % povečanju bruto domačega proizvoda,
whereas a programme aimed at reducing the administrative burdens arising from European Union legislation has been in place since 2005 and seeks to reduce those burdens by 25 % by 2012, which would be equivalent to a 1.4 % increase in the level of GDP,
ker je glede na letno poročilo odbora za oceno učinka za leto 2010 Komisija celovito izmerila le 27 % ocen učinka, opravljenih tega leta;
whereas, according to the 2010 Impact Assessment Board (IAB) Annual Report, the Commission comprehensively quantified only 27 % of the impact assessments undertaken in that year,
ker je Komisija predlagala ukrepe za zmanjšanje upravnih bremen, s katerimi bi bil zastavljeni cilj celo presežen, a morata Parlament in Svet prej še sprejeti predhodne ukrepe, ki ustrezajo približno četrtini cilja 25-odstotnega zmanjšanja;
whereas although the Commission has proposed measures to reduce administrative burdens exceeding the target figure, the Parliament and the Council have yet to adopt prior measures accounting for around a quarter of the 25 % target;
ker je eden od ključnih elementov programa referenčno merjenje upravnih stroškov, osnovano na metodi standardnih stroškov,
whereas one of the key elements of the programme is the baseline measurement of administrative costs based on a standard cost model,
ker uporaba tehnike prenovitve in kodifikacije za poenostavitev in kodifikacijo veljavne zakonodaje zagotavlja večjo jasnost in skladnost vnesenih sprememb,
whereas the use of recasting and codification to simplify and codify existing legislation ensures greater clarity and consistency as regards the changes made,
ker razlike pri izvajanju pomenijo velik izziv za učinkovito in uspešno delovanje enotnega trga, kar povzroča, da se države članice delijo na troje: na tiste, ki evropsko zakonodajo izvajajo nepravilno, na tiste, ki jo izvajajo nepopolno, in na take, ki jo izvajajo netočno, to pa evropska podjetja in potrošnike potiska v neenak položaj in zavira nadaljnjo rast;
whereas divergences due to differing implementation pose great challenges to the efficient and effective functioning of the Single Market, with the resulting three-tiered group of Member States, comprising those with incorrect implementation, incomplete implementation or inaccurate implementation, disadvantaging European businesses and consumers at the cost of further growth,
ker je bil z zakonom za mala podjetja uveden test MSP, ki pa je bil do zdaj uporabljen v zelo maloštevilnih primerih,
whereas the SME Test was introduced in the Small Business Act, but has only been applied in a minority of possible cases so far,
ker je podpredsednik Komisije Maroš Šefčovič na izmenjavi mnenj na seji Odbora za pravne zadeve 27. januarja 2011 izrazil trdno zavezanost načrtu za pametno pravno ureditev,
whereas the Vice-President of the Commission, Mr Maroš Šefčovič, expressed a strong commitment to the smart regulation agenda at the exchange of views held at the meeting of the Committee on Legal Affairs on 27 January 2011,
ker Lizbonska pogodba za delegirane in izvedbene akte iz členov 290 in 291 PDEU določa nov sistem, po katerem so delegirani akti predmet skupnega dogovora, izvedbeni akti pa uredbe,
whereas the new system under the Lisbon Treaty of delegated and implementing acts, in Articles 290 and 291 TFEU, is now subject to a common understanding and a regulation respectively,
poudarja, da so enostavni, pregledni, dostopni in zlahka razumljivi predpisi izredno pomembni, saj so jamstvo za upoštevanje načela preglednosti evropske zakonodaje in za njeno učinkovitejše izvajanje, obenem pa državljanom EU omogočajo lažje uveljavljanje njihovih pravic;
Stresses the vital importance of making simple and clear laws that are accessible and easily understood with a view to safeguarding the principle of transparency of European legislation and guaranteeing more effective implementation thereof, and to ensuring that EU citizens are able to exercise their rights more easily;
poudarja, da morajo evropske institucije pri oblikovanju predlogov spoštovati načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ter upoštevati merila iz Protokola št. 2, priloženega PDEU;
Emphasises that European institutions must respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality when formulating proposals and observe the criteria laid down in Protocol No 2 annexed to the TFEU;
podpira strateški pristop Komisije iz sporočila o pametni zakonodaji v Evropski uniji, ki postavlja „pametne predpise“ v središče celotnega procesa formuliranja politik – od zasnove pravnega akta do njegovega izvajanja, uveljavljanja, ocenjevanja in revizije;
Endorses the strategic approach adopted by the Commission in its communication on Smart Regulation in the European Union, which places smart regulation at the centre of the entire process of policy formulation, from the drafting of a legal act to implementation, enforcement, assessment and revision;
poudarja, da imajo za spodbujanje in zagotavljanje boljše zakonodaje pomembni vsi evropski institucionalni dejavniki, pač v skladu z načeli in smernicami iz načrta za pametno pravno ureditev in medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje; meni, da bi morale vse vpletene strani pokazati obnovljeno zavezanost tem načelom;
Points out that all European institutional actors have a role in promoting and delivering better lawmaking, in accordance with the principles and guidance contained in the Smart Regulation agenda and the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making; considers that renewed commitment to these principles should be shown by all the parties involved;
ob sklicevanju na Montijevo poročilo odločno poudarja, da bi se bilo treba pri zakonodajnih predlogih v večji meri zatekati k uredbam, da bi sprejemali manj zakonodaje, ki pa bi bila boljša;
Stresses that, pursuing the same approach as was adopted in the Monti report, greater use should be made of regulations in legislative proposals, as part of the move towards less and better legislation;
spodbuja prihodnja predsedstva in Komisijo, naj obnovijo pogajanja o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje; opozarja na ustrezne točke iz resolucije z dne 9. februarja 2010 o okvirnem sporazumu o odnosih med Parlamentom in Komisijo, zlasti na skupno zavezo obeh institucij, da se bosta dogovorili o ključnih spremembah pri pripravi prihodnjih pogajanj s Svetom glede prilagoditve medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje novim določbam Lizbonske pogodbe;
Urges the upcoming Presidencies and the Commission to set in motion the process of renegotiating the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making; draws attention, in this regard, to the relevant paragraphs of its resolution of 9 February 2010 on the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission, especially to the joint commitment by the two institutions to agree on key changes in preparation for future negotiations with the Council of Ministers on adapting the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making to the new provisions of the Lisbon Treaty;
poudarja, da bi si morali kar najbolj prizadevati, da bi bila Parlament in Svet v zakonodajnem postopku obravnavana enakopravno, saj bi s tem zagotovili izvajanje načela enakega obravnavanja obeh institucij, ki izhaja iz Lizbonske pogodbe;
Stresses that every effort should be made to ensure that Parliament and the Council are treated as equals in the law-making process, thus implementing the principle of equal treatment of the two institutions deriving from the Lisbon Treaty;
pozdravlja evropsko državljansko pobudo kot novo obliko javne udeležbe pri oblikovanju politike Evropske unije; z zadovoljstvom pričakuje prve državljanske pobude, ki jih bo mogoče sprožiti od aprila 2012 dalje, in spodbuja Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo državljani dejansko poznali ustrezna veljavna pravila in uredbe, s čimer bodo ta instrument lahko učinkovito uporabljali od samega začetka;
Welcomes the European citizens' initiative as a new form of public participation in European Union policy shaping; looks forward to its entry into operation in April 2012, and encourages the Commission to ensure that citizens are made aware of the rules and regulations applicable so as to enable them to use this instrument effectively from the outset;
poziva Komisijo, naj se obveže glede rokov, v katerih bo izpolnila zahteve Parlamenta v skladu s členom 225 PDEU; pri tem se še posebej sklicuje na zavezo iz okvirnega sporazuma, da mora Komisija v treh mesecih po sprejetju poročila o zakonodajni pobudi na plenarnem zasedanju pripraviti poročilo o konkretnem izvajanju zahtev in najpozneje v enem letu predložiti zakonodajni predlog;
Calls on the Commission to give an undertaking regarding the deadlines by which it will meet requests made by Parliament pursuant to Article 225 TFEU, with specific reference to the commitment under the Framework Agreement to draw up a report on the concrete follow-up of any request within the three months following the adoption of a legislative initiative report in plenary and to submit a legislative proposal at the latest after one year;
z zadovoljstvom sprejema tesnejše vključevanje nacionalnih parlamentov v proces oblikovanja evropske zakonodaje, zlasti v proces preverjanja skladnosti zakonodajnih predlogov z načelom subsidiarnosti;
Welcomes the closer involvement of national parliaments in the European legislative process, in particular in the process of verifying the compliance of legislative proposals with the principle of subsidiarity;
pri uporabi instrumentov nasprotovanja in tožbe zaradi kršitve subsidiarnosti opozarja, da materialnih meril za ugotavljanje kršitev načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ni, ter poudarja, da je treba na ravni EU določiti materialne pogoje za njuno izvajanje;
Points, in the context of the use made of the instruments for raising objections and actions on grounds of subsidiarity, to the lack of material criteria for establishing that there has been a breach of the subsidiarity or proportionality principle, and underlines the need for the material conditions for the application of those principles to be specifically defined at EU level;
poudarja, da bodo lahko nacionalni parlamenti bolje izpolnjevali svojo pogodbeno odgovornost za preverjanje združljivosti zakonodajnih predlogov z načeloma subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, če bo Komisija v celoti izpolnila svojo obveznost natančne in celovite utemeljitve, določene v členu 5 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti;
Stresses that the national parliaments will be better able to comply with their responsibility under the Treaty to test the compliance of legislative proposals with the subsidiarity and proportionality principles if the Commission for its part complies fully with its obligation, as laid down in Article 5 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, to give detailed and comprehensible reasons for its decisions;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da morajo nacionalni parlamenti pri predlaganju mnenj kolikor je le mogoče razlikovati med vidikoma subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti;
Highlights, in this context, the need for the national parliaments, when submitting an opinion, to distinguish between the aspects of subsidiarity and proportionality as far as possible;
je zaskrbljen, ker se lahko zgodi, da program za zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev ne bo izpolnil zastavljenega cilja, to je 25-odstotno zmanjšanje upravnih bremen do leta 2012, in opozarja, da bi se morala Parlament in Svet hitro odzvati z obravnavo in odobritvijo predlaganih ukrepov; v tej zvezi ugotavlja koristnost vse pogostejše uporabe hitrih postopkov za sprejetje teh predlogov; se obvezuje, da bo v kratkem obravnaval zakonodajne predloge o teh ukrepih, Svet pa poziva, naj stori vse, da bodo sprejete omejitve upravnih bremen, opredeljenih s programom;
Expresses concern that the programme to reduce administrative burdens may not reach its target of reducing administrative burdens by 25 % by 2012 and points out that Parliament and the Council should act promptly in order to consider and approve proposed measures; notes in this regard the value of increased use of fast-track procedures to adopt these proposals; undertakes to give prompt consideration to legislative proposals relating to such measures, and calls on the Council to do all it can to ensure that the reductions in administrative burdens identified by the programme are adopted;
ugotavlja, da je skupina na visoki ravni neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani za upravna bremena pozitivno prispevala k programu Komisije za zmanjšanje teh bremen; vendar poudarja, da bi morala biti sestava skupine bolj uravnotežena in vključevati več strokovnjakov iz vrst civilne družbe in drugih držav članic;
Notes the positive contribution made by the High-Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens to the programme to reduce those burdens that is being carried out by the Commission; emphasises, however, that the composition of the group should be better balanced, with the inclusion of more experts representing civil society and experts from other Member States;
spodbuja skupino na visoki ravni neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani za upravna bremena, naj začne dvostransko razpravo z malimi in srednjimi podjetji iz vse Evrope, da skupaj opredelijo najpogosteje omenjene ovire pri trgovanju z drugimi državami članicami na enotnem trgu ter predlagajo ukrepe za odpravo ali zmanjšanje teh ovir, s tem pa za povečano rast;
Encourages the High-Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens to enter into a dialogue with SMEs from across Europe, to identify the barriers most frequently referenced for preventing them from trading with other Member States within the Single Market, and propose measures to remove or reduce these obstacles to increased growth;
poudarja, da se mora program nadaljevati tudi po letu 2012 do konca mandata sedanje Komisije, z bolj smelo in jasneje zastavljenim ciljem in obsežnejšim področjem uporabe, kar bi mu omogočilo, da preseže zgolj upravna bremena in obravnava zakonodajna bremena in stroške, ki izhajajo iz zakonodaje EU kot celote, vključno z regulatornimi „nevšečnostmi“;
Stresses the need for the programme to continue post-2012 to cover the life of the current Commission, with a more ambitious and clearly defined target and an enhanced remit to enable the programme to extend beyond simply administrative burdens and to address regulatory burdens and costs arising from EU legislation as a whole, including regulatory ‘nuisances’;
poziva države članice k doslednem zmanjševanju upravnih bremen in z zadovoljstvom pričakuje stalno konstruktivno sodelovanje z nacionalnimi parlamenti na tem področju;
Calls on the Member States to work consistently to reduce administrative burdens, and looks forward to continued constructive cooperation with national parliaments on this matter;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj še naprej izvaja ukrepe za zmanjšanje upravnih bremen iz sektorskih načrtov;
Urges the Commission to continue to implement sectoral plan measures to reduce administrative burdens;
meni, da proces zmanjševanja upravnega bremena in poenostavitve zakonodaje ne bi smel povzročiti znižanja standardov, določenih z veljavno zakonodajo;
Considers that the process of reducing administrative burden and simplifying legislation should not lead to a lowering of the standards laid down in the current legislation;
poziva Komisijo k boljši izrabi belih knjig, v katerih so predstavljeni osnutki zakonodajnih predlogov za obravnavo; meni, da bi to pripomoglo k manj pogostemu, bolj ali manj obsežnemu revidiranju predlogov med zakonodajnim postopkom; meni tudi, da bi to pomagalo pri pogosto težki oceni sorazmernosti predlagane zakonodaje, saj so na začetku okvirni predlogi predstavljeni zgolj v obliki zelene knjige;
Calls on the Commission to make better use of White Papers presenting draft legislative proposals for consideration; considers that this would reduce the frequency with which proposals have to undergo substantial, if not wholesale, revision during the legislative process; further considers that this would aid evaluation of the proportionality of suggested legislation, which is often difficult when only outline proposals are presented initially in Green Paper form;
meni, da bi bilo za boljše delovanje evropskega prava treba izboljšati obveščanje o zakonodajnem procesu in zakonodajnih predlogih, saj iz obvestil institucij za podjetja in državljane pogosto ni jasno razvidno, katera zakonodaja je bila na koncu sprejeta;
Considers that, in order for European legislation to function better, communication about the legislative process and legislative proposals should be improved, because the reports emanating from the institutions often make it unclear to businesses and the public exactly what legislation has ultimately been adopted;
pozdravlja, da se je Komisija obvezala pregledati postopek posvetovanja, in podpira sprejeto odločitev o podaljšanju minimalnega posvetovalnega obdobja na 12 tednov; vseeno poudarja, da je treba bolj vključevati vse zainteresirane strani, in meni, da bi morala Komisija proučiti metode za uvedbo vključujočih postopkov za večjo ozaveščenost; meni, da bi med te postopke lahko sodilo iskanje nacionalnih in evropskih zainteresiranih strani po posameznih političnih področjih in predlogih ter njihovo neposredno vključevanje v postopek posvetovanja;
Welcomes the Commission's commitment to review its consultation procedure, and endorses the decision taken to extend the minimum period of consultation to 12 weeks; stresses, however, that there is a need to better involve all stakeholders and considers that the Commission could explore methods of introducing inclusive awareness-raising procedures; considers that such a procedure could include identifying national and European stakeholders of interest to relevant policy fields and proposals and seeking to involve them directly in the consultation process;
poudarja, da je odprt, pregleden in reden dialog temeljni pogoj za večjo udeleženost civilne družbe pri pripravi zakonodaje in javnem upravljanju;
Stresses that open, transparent and regular dialogue is a basic precondition for greater involvement of civil society in the process of shaping legislation and governance;
izraža stališče, da bi ob takšni sistematični metodi vse interesne in zainteresirane skupine lahko obširno analizirale možne socialne, gospodarske in okoljske učinke predlagane zakonodaje, kar bi koristilo formuliranju politike in bi bilo v duhu načel celostnega pristopa;
Suggests that a systematic method such as this would allow all interested parties and relevant stakeholders to provide a broad analysis of possible social, economic and environmental impacts of proposed legislation, to the benefit of policy formulation, adhering to the principles of an integrated approach;
meni, da sedanje asimetrične metode in oblike posvetovanja ne spodbujajo k odgovoru vseh zainteresiranih strani; ugotavlja, da so anketiranci pogosto nezadovoljni z obliko in vsebino spletnih vprašalnikov; predlaga skupen pristop s standardnim obrazcem za odgovore, kar bi zadevo poenostavilo za anketirance, navajalo pa bi tudi k bolj podrobni in utemeljeni izbiri odgovorov, ki bi zajemali vrsto potencialnih političnih tem in možnosti za posvetovanje;
Considers that the current asymmetric methods and forms of consultation do not encourage responses from all interested stakeholders; notes the dissatisfaction often expressed by respondents regarding the form and content of online questionnaires; suggests that a common approach involving a standard form for responses to consultations would simplify matters for respondents and encourage receipt of a more detailed and reasoned selection of responses, covering the variety of potential policy issues and options consulted upon;
poziva zlasti Komisijo, naj v javna posvetovanja in objavo njihovih rezultatov učinkovito vključi večjezičnost, saj je to pogoj za široko udeležbo vseh zainteresiranih strani v Evropi;
In particular, calls on the Commission to effectively mainstream multilingualism in the running and publication of the results of public consultations, as a prerequisite for extensive involvement of all the European stakeholders;
je zaskrbljen zaradi vse bolj zapletenih dokumentov za posvetovanja in meni, da si je treba prizadevati za njihovo poenostavitev, tudi s pogostejšo uporabo belih knjig, kar bi zainteresirane strani spodbudilo k odgovoru, hkrati pa bi bili bolj dostopni za državljane; predlaga, da Komisija prouči, ali bi se lahko uvedel „test jasnosti“, da bi bili dokumenti za posvetovanje lahko razumljivi in enostavni za odgovarjanje;
Expresses concern at the increasing complexity of consultation documents, and considers that efforts should be made, including the increased use of White Papers, to simplify them so as to aid and encourage responses from the relevant stakeholders, while increasing their accessibility for citizens; suggests that the Commission should investigate whether a ‘clarity test’ could be introduced, to ensure that consultation documents are easy to understand and reply to;
obžaluje, da se anketirancem odziv Komisije na posvetovanja pogosto zdi nezadovoljiv; poziva Komisijo, naj ob koncu posvetovalnega obdobja izboljša komunikacijo in zagotovi povratne informacije o glavnih vprašanjih, ki so jih izpostavili vsi anketiranci;
Regrets that currently the response and feedback given by the Commission to consultations is frequently seen as unsatisfactory by respondents; urges the Commission to improve its communication after the consultation period has closed, and to provide feedback on the main issues raised by all respondents;
poudarja, kako pomembno je, da so analize, ki jih Komisija opravi z ocenami učinka, neodvisne in verodostojne, da se zavarujejo osnovni cilji iz načrta za pametno pravno ureditev; ponavlja svoje stališče o tem vprašanju iz resolucije z dne 8. junija 2011;
Underlines the importance of guaranteeing the independence and credibility of the analyses carried out in the Commission's impact assessments so as to secure the overall goals of the smart regulation agenda, and reiterates Parliament's position on the issue as set out in its resolution of 8 June 2011;