natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da so nekatere države članice sprejele pobude, da strankam, ki uporabijo mediacijo, ponudijo finančne spodbude: v Bolgariji bo strankam povrnjenih 50 % takse, plačane za vložitev tožbe, če uspešno rešijo spor z mediacijo, romunska zakonodaja pa določa povračilo celotne takse, če stranke pravni spor rešijo z mediacijo; ugotavlja, da je podobno določbo mogoče najti v madžarski zakonodaji in da so v Italiji vsi akti in sporazumi v postopku mediacije oproščeni taks in pristojbin;
Observes that some European states have undertaken a number of initiatives to provide financial incentives to parties who refer cases to mediation: in Bulgaria, parties will receive a refund of 50% of the state fee already paid for filing the dispute in court if they successfully resolve a dispute in mediation, and Romanian legislation provides for full reimbursement of the court fee if the parties settle a pending legal dispute through mediation; notes that similar provision is to be found in Hungarian legislation and that in Italy all mediation acts and agreements are exempt from stamp duties and charges;
ugotavlja, da so se poleg finančnih spodbud nekatere države članice s preobremenjenim sodstvom zatekle k določbam, po katerih je mediacija obvezna; ugotavlja, da v teh primerih ni mogoče vložiti tožbe pred sodiščem, če stranki najprej ne poskusita zadeve rešiti z mediacijo;
Observes that, alongside the financial incentives, certain Member States whose judicial systems are overburdened have resorted to rules making recourse to mediation compulsory; notes that in such cases disputes cannot be filed in court until the parties have first attempted to resolve the issues by mediation;
ugotavlja, da je najočitnejši primer italijanski zakonodajni odlok št. 28, katerega cilj je na ta način preurediti pravni sistem in ukrepati zoper splošno znano težavo prezasedenosti italijanskih sodišč, tako da se zmanjša obremenjenost in skrajša povprečna devetletna čakalna doba za sodbo v civilni zadevi; ugotavlja, da odvetniki tega ukrepa niso dobro sprejeli, kar ni presenetljivo, in da so ta odlok celo izpodbijali na sodišču ter stavkali;
Points out that the most striking example is Italian Legislative Decree No 28, which aims in this way to overhaul the legal system and make up for the notoriously congested Italian courts by reducing caseloads and the nine-year average time to complete litigation in a civil case; observes that, not surprisingly, this has not been well received by practitioners, who have challenged the decree in court and even gone on strike;
ugotavlja, da so kljub polemikam države članice, katerih zakonodaja presega temeljne zahteve direktive o mediaciji, dosegle pomembne rezultate pri spodbujanju zunajsodnega reševanja sporov v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah; ugotavlja, da rezultati zlasti iz Italije, Bolgarije in Romunije dokazujejo, da lahko mediacija nudi stroškovno učinkovito in hitro zunajsodno rešitev sporov prek postopkov, ki so prilagojeni potrebam strank;
Points out that, despite the controversy, Member States whose national legislation goes beyond the core requirements of the Mediation Directive seem to have achieved important results in promoting the non-judicial treatment of disputes in civil and commercial matters; observes that the results achieved in particular in Italy, Bulgaria and Romania prove that mediation can bring about a cost-effective and quick extrajudicial resolution of disputes through processes tailored to the needs of the parties;
ugotavlja, da se zdi, da mediacija v italijanskem pravnem sistemu dosega cilj zmanjšanja obremenjenosti sodišč; kljub temu poudarja, da bi bilo treba mediacijo spodbujati kot sprejemljivo, poceni in hitrejšo alternativno obliko zagotavljanja pravičnosti, ne pa kot obvezen vidik sodnega postopka;
Observes that compulsory mediation appears to be achieving the objective in the Italian legal system by relieving congestion in the courts; nevertheless stresses that mediation should be promoted as a viable, low-cost and quicker alternative form of justice rather than a compulsory aspect of the judicial procedure;
priznava, da so finančne spodbude iz bolgarskega zakona o mediaciji dosegle dobre rezultate; vendar priznava, da je ta uspeh tudi izid že dolgotrajnega interesa bolgarskega pravnega sistema za mediacijo, in da mediacijska skupnost obstaja že od leta 1990, center za poravnave, v katerem v izmenah delajo mediatorji, pa od leta 2010 dnevno nudi brezplačne storitve mediacije in informacije strankam v zadevah, ki se rešujejo pred sodišči; ugotavlja, da se v Bolgariji mediacija opravlja v dveh tretjinah zadev, polovica teh primerov pa se uspešno reši v postopku mediacije;
Acknowledges the successful results achieved by the financial incentives provided for by the Bulgarian law on mediation; recognises, however, that these are also due to the long-standing interest in mediation shown by the Bulgarian legal system in that the mediation community has been in existence since 1990 and the Settlement Centre – staffed by mediators working in shifts – has since 2010 been providing free mediation services and information for parties in pending court cases on a daily basis; notes that in Bulgaria two thirds of the cases referred were mediated and half of those cases were brought to a successful conclusion in mediation;
ugotavlja tudi, da je romunski zakon o mediaciji prinesel dobre rezultate; poleg določb o finančnih spodbudah je bil vzpostavljen tudi svet za mediacijo - nacionalni organ za mediacijo, ki je ločen in samostojen organ; ukvarja se izključno s spodbujanjem mediacije, razvojem standardov usposabljanja, pripravo izobraževalcev, izdajo listin, ki potrjujejo strokovno usposobljenost mediatorjev, sprejetjem etičnega kodeksa in sestavo predlogov za dodatno zakonodajo;
Notes also the successful results of the Romanian law on mediation: as well as the provisions on financial incentives, a Mediation Council – a national authority for mediation practice which exists as a separate, autonomous legal body – has been established; it is entirely devoted to promoting mediation activity, developing training standards, preparing training-course providers, issuing documents certifying mediators' professional qualifications, adopting a code of ethics, and formulating proposals for more legislation;
ob upoštevanju zgoraj povedanega meni, da so države članice večinoma na pravi poti za prenos Direktive 2008/52/ES do 21. maja 2011 in da kljub temu, da imajo države članice različne regulativne pristope ter da nekatere države nekoliko zaostajajo, ostaja dejstvo, da države članice ne delujejo le v skladu z direktivo, temveč presegajo njene zahteve;
Believes that, in the light of all of the foregoing, the Member States are, as a whole, largely on track to implement Directive 2008/52/EC by 21 May 2011 and that, while Member States are using varied regulatory approaches and some states are a little behind, the fact remains that most Member States are not only compliant, but are in fact ahead of the Directive's requirements;
poudarja, da bodo stranke, ki so pripravljene rešiti primer, precej verjetneje sodelovale, ne pa delovale druga proti drugi; zato meni, da so te stranke pogosto bolj pripravljene upoštevati položaj druge stranke in preučiti temelje spora; meni, da je dodatna korist pogosto to, da se med strankama ohrani enako razmerje kot pred sporom, kar je nadvse pomembno v družinskih zadevah, v katere so vpleteni otroci;
Stresses that parties who are willing to work toward resolving their case are more likely to work with one another than against one another; believes that therefore these parties are often more open to consideration of the other party's position and work on the underlying issues of the dispute; considers that this often has the added benefit of preserving the relationship the parties had before the dispute, which is of particular importance in family matters involving children;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj v svojem prihodnjem sporočilu o izvajanju Direktive 2008/52/ES preuči tudi tista področja, na katera so države članice razširile njene ukrepe, čeprav jih direktiva ni nameravala zajeti;
Encourages the Commission, in its forthcoming Communication on the implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC, also to examine those areas where Member States have chosen to extend the measures of the Directive beyond its intended scope;
poudarja značilnosti ureditev alternativnega reševanja sporov, ki so prijazne do potrošnika in mu ponujajo prilagojene praktične rešitve; v zvezi s tem poziva k čimprejšnji predložitvi zakonodajnega predloga Komisije o alternativnem reševanju sporov;
Highlights the consumer-friendly features of alternative dispute resolution schemes, which offer a tailored practical solution; calls in this context for the prompt presentation of a legislative proposal on alternative dispute resolution by the Commission;
ugotavlja, da sodnik ali porota ne bi mogla priti do rešitev, ki izhajajo iz mediacije in so oblikovane med strankami; zato je prepričan, da bo mediacija bolj verjetno prinesla obojestransko sprejemljiv rezultat za obe stranki; ugotavlja, da bosta tak dogovor stranki bolj verjetno sprejeli in da je spoštovanje dogovorov mediacije navadno precejšnje;
Notes that solutions resulting from mediation and developed between parties could not be provided by a judge or a jury; believes, therefore, that mediation is more likely to produce a result that is mutually agreeable, or ‘win-win’, for the parties; notes that, as a result, acceptance of such an agreement is more likely and compliance with mediated agreements is usually high;
verjame, da sta potrebna večja ozaveščenost in razumevanje mediacije, zato poziva k nadaljnjim ukrepom za izobraževanje in ozaveščanje o mediaciji, spodbujanje njene uporabe pri podjetjih in določitev zahtev za pridobitev poklica mediatorja;
Believes that there is a need for increased awareness and understanding of mediation, and calls for further action relating to education, growing awareness of mediation, enhancing mediation uptake by businesses and requirements for access to the profession of mediator;
meni, da bi bilo treba nacionalne organe spodbuditi k oblikovanju programov za krepitev poznavanja alternativnega reševanja sporov; meni, da bi morali ti ukrepi obravnavati glavne prednosti mediacije – stroške, uspešnost in časovno učinkovitost – in zajeti pravnike, notarje in podjetja, zlasti mala in srednja podjetja, ter tudi akademske kroge;
Considers that national authorities should be encouraged to develop programmes in order to promote adequate knowledge of alternative dispute resolution; considers that those actions should address the main advantages of mediation – cost, success rate and time efficiency – and should concern lawyers, notaries and businesses, in particular SMEs, as well as academics;
priznava pomen oblikovanja skupnih standardov za pridobitev poklica mediatorja, s čimer bi prispevali h kakovosti mediacije ter zagotovili visoke standarde poklicnega usposabljanja in akreditacije v vsej Uniji;
Acknowledges the importance of establishing common standards for accessing the profession of mediator in order to promote a better quality of mediation and to ensure high standards of professional training and accreditation across the Union;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. septembra 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 378/2007 glede pravil za izvajanje prostovoljne modulacije neposrednih plačil v okviru skupne kmetijske politike ( KOM(2010)0772 – C7-0013/2011 – 2010/0372(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 as regards the rules for the implementation of voluntary modulation of direct payments under the common agricultural policy ( COM(2010)0772 – C7-0013/2011 – 2010/0372(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0772 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0772 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7-0013/2011 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0013/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 15. marca 2011 UL C 132, 3.5.2011, str.
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 15 March 2011 OJ C 132, 3.5.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju pisne zaveze predstavnika Sveta z dne 30. junija 2011, da bo Svet odobril stališče Parlamenta v skladu s členom 294(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 30 June 2011 to approve Parliament's position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union],
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0203/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0203/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora UL C 132, 3.5.2011, str.
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee OJ C 132, 3.5.2011, p.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 378/2007 z dne 27. marca 2007 o pravilih za prostovoljno modulacijo neposrednih plačil, predvidenih v Uredbi (ES) št. 1782/2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete UL L 95, 5.4.2007, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 of 27 March 2007 laying down rules for voluntary modulation of direct payments provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers OJ L 95, 5.4.2007, p.
daje Komisiji
confers ▌ on the Commission
za izvajanje
to implement
določb navedene uredbe.
provisions of that Regulation.
Zaradi začetka veljavnosti
As a consequence of the entry into force of the
Lizbonske pogodbe
Treaty of Lisbon
je treba pooblastila, podeljena
, the powers conferred
v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 378/2007, uskladiti
under Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 ▌ need to be aligned
členoma 290 in 291 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ▌.
Zato bi bilo treba Uredbo (ES) št. 378/2007 ustrezno spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 378/2007 should therefore be amended accordingly,
na podlagi:‚
, based on:“
člen 6 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 6 is replaced by the following:
'Člen 6
“Article 6
Komisija z izvedbenimi akti sprejme posebne določbe za vključitev prostovoljne modulacije v okvir programov za razvoj podeželja.
The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts ▌, adopt specific provisions for the integration of voluntary modulation in the rural development programming.
Ti izvedbeni akti se sprejmejo v skladu s postopkom s pregledom iz člena 6a(1).
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 6a(1).
Komisija z izvedbenimi akti sprejme posebne določbe za vključitev finančnega upravljanja prostovoljne modulacije.
The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts ▌, adopt specific provisions for the financial management of voluntary modulation.
vstavi se naslednji člen:
the following Article is added:
Člen 6a
'Article 6a
Komisiji pomaga odbor za razvoj podeželja, ustanovljen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Rural Development Committee established by Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005.
To je odbor v smislu Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011*.
That committee is a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011*.
Komisiji pomaga odbor za kmetijske sklade, ustanovljen z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Committee on the agricultural funds established by Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. septembra 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi nekaterih smernic na področju uradno podprtih izvoznih kreditov ( KOM(2006)0456 – C7-0050/2010 – 2006/0167(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of certain guidelines in the field of officially supported export credits ( COM(2006)0456 – C7-0050/2010 – 2006/0167(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0456 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0456 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 133 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 133 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 207(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7-0050/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0050/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj in Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A7-0364/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A7-0364/2010 ),
sprejme stališče v prvi obravnavi, kakor je določeno v nadaljevanju To stališče nadomesti spremembe, sprejete 5. aprila 2011 (Sprejeta besedila P7_TA(2011)0126 ).
Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out This position replaces the amendments adopted on 5 April 2011 (Texts adopted P7_TA(2011)0126 ).
je pogodbenica Sporazuma o ▌uradno podprtih izvoznih kreditih (v nadaljevanju „Sporazum“), sklenjenega v okviru Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD).
is party to the Arrangement on ▌Officially Supported Export Credits (‘the Arrangement’) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (‘OECD’).
ureja finančne pogoje in določila, ki jih agencije za izvozne kredite lahko ponudijo, da se ohranijo enaki pogoji za uradno podprte izvozne kredite
regulates the financial terms and conditions that ECAs may offer in order to foster a level playing field for officially supported export credits
Na podlagi Odločbe Sveta 2001/76/ES z dne 22. decembra 2000 o nadomestitvi Odločbe z dne 4. aprila 1978 o uporabi nekaterih smernic na področju uradno podprtih izvoznih kreditov UL L 32, 2.2.2001, str.
By virtue of Council Decision 2001/76/EC of 22 December 2000 replacing the Decision of 4 April 1978 on the application of certain guidelines in the field of officially supported export credits OJ L 32, 2.2.2001, p.
in Odločbe Sveta 2001/77/ES z dne 22. decembra 2000 o uporabi načel okvirnega sporazuma o financiranju projektov na področju uradno podprtih izvoznih posojil UL L 32, 2.2.2001, str.
and Council Decision 2001/77/EC of 22 December 2000 on the application of principles of a framework agreement on project finance in the field of officially supported export credits OJ L 32, 2.2.2001, p.
se v Uniji uporabljajo smernice iz Sporazuma in posebna pravila za financiranje projektov.
, the guidelines contained in the Arrangement and the specific rules for project finance apply in the Union.
Sporazum prek dejavnosti agencij za izvozne kredite posredno prispeva k prosti in pošteni trgovini in naložbam podjetij, ki bi imela sicer slabše možnosti za najem posojil v zasebnem sektorju.
The Arrangement indirectly contributes, through the activity of the ECAs, to free and fair trade and investment by companies which would otherwise have less access to credit facilities provided by the private sector.
Države članice bi morale pri ustanavljanju, razvoju in uporabi nacionalnih sistemov za izvozne kredite ter izvajanju nadzora nad uradno podprtimi izvoznimi krediti upoštevati splošne določbe Unije o zunanjem delovanju, kot so utrjevanje demokracije, spoštovanje človekovih pravic, skladna politika za razvoj in boj proti podnebnim spremembam.
The Member States should comply with the Union's general provisions on External Action, such as consolidating democracy, respect for human rights and policy coherence for development, and the fight against climate change, when establishing, developing and implementing their national export credit systems and when carrying out their supervision of officially supported export credit activities.
Udeleženke Sporazuma si nenehno prizadevajo, da bi omejile izkrivljanje trga in zagotovile enake konkurenčne pogoje, po katerih premije, ki jih zaračunavajo agencije za izvozne kredite, temeljijo na tveganju in morajo zadostovati za kritje dolgoročnih stroškov in izgub iz poslovanja v skladu z obveznostmi Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
The Participants to the Arrangement are involved in a continuous process intended to minimise market distortion and to establish a level playing field in which the premiums charged by the ECAs are risk-based and should be adequate to cover long term operating costs and losses and in accordance with World Trade Organization obligations.
Za doseganje tega cilja sistemi za izvozne kredite delujejo na pregleden način, agencije pa ustrezno poročajo OECD.
In order to achieve this goal, the export credit systems operate in a transparent way and agencies report accordingly to the OECD.
Dobro usmerjeni izvozni krediti, ki jih ponujajo agencije za izvozne kredite, lahko podjetjem v Uniji prinesejo nove možnosti za dostop do trga, tudi malim in srednjim podjetjem.
Well-targeted export credits provided by ECAs can contribute to market access opportunities for Union companies, also for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs).
Udeleženke Sporazuma in države članice Unije so se dogovorile, da bodo razkrivale določene informacije o izvoznih kreditih v skladu s pravili OECD in Unije o preglednosti, da bi omogočile enake konkurenčne pogoje za udeleženke in države članice.
The Participants to the Arrangement and the Member States of the Union agreed to disclose certain information on export credits according to the transparency rules of the OECD and of the Union in order to facilitate a level playing field for the Participants and Member States.
Unija izvaja ukrepe za preglednost in poročanje, kakor je določeno v Prilogi I.
The Union applies transparency and reporting measures as set out in Annex I.
Ker je konkurenca na svetovnih trgih vse ostrejša in ker bi bilo treba preprečiti neugoden konkurenčni položaj podjetij v Uniji, bi morala Komisija na podlagi pooblastila držav članic za pogajanja podpreti prizadevanja OECD za odnose z državami, ki niso udeleženke Sporazuma.
In view of the intensified competitive situation on world markets and in order to avoid competitive disadvantages for Union companies, the Commission, with regard to the negotiating authorisation from the Member States, should support the efforts of the OECD in reaching out to non-Participants to the Arrangement.
Komisija bi morala na bilateralnih in multilateralnih pogajanjih vzpostaviti svetovne standarde za uradno podprte izvozne kredite.
The Commission should use bilateral and multilateral negotiations in order to establish global standards for officially supported export credits.
Svetovni standardi na tem področju so nujno potrebni za enake konkurenčne pogoje v svetovni trgovini.
Global standards in this field are a prerequisite for a level playing field in world trade.
Države članice OECD Sporazum zavezuje, medtem ko države, ki niso članice te organizacije, niso udeleženke tega sporazuma, kar bi lahko privedlo do nepoštene konkurenčne prednosti za njihove izvoznike.
Although OECD countries are guided by the Arrangement, non-OECD countries are not Participants to the Arrangement and this could lead to a competitive advantage for exporters of the latter countries.