natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker še vedno obstajajo veliki izzivi glede spremljanja in izvajanja pravno zavezujočih klavzul o človekovih pravicah v mednarodnih sporazumih EU; ker je prekinitev mednarodnega sporazuma med Unijo in partnersko državo zaradi resnih kršitev človekovih pravic ali demokracije možnost, ki naj bi se jo uporabilo v določenih razmerah; ker kljub pogostim kršitvam klavzul o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji ter dejstvu, da nekatere tretje države zavez iz ustreznih mednarodnih sporazumov ne spoštujejo, so vlade teh držav le redko kaznovane in redko prevzamejo ustrezno odgovornost celo v primeru grobih kršitev človekovih pravic; ker dejstvo, da EU ne uporablja tega orodja na ustrezen način, spodkopava verodostojnost Unije kot močnega in odločnega akterja na mednarodnem prizorišču,
whereas major challenges persist with regard to monitoring and implementing the legally binding human rights clauses in the EU's international agreements; whereas the suspension of an international agreement between the Union and its partner country in response to severe violations of human rights or democracy is a tool which exists to be used in certain situations; whereas, despite frequent breaches of the human rights and democracy clause and the failure of some third countries to honour the commitments made in the relevant international agreements, the governments of the countries in question are rarely penalised or held sufficiently accountable even in the face of gross human rights violations; whereas the EU's failure to employ this tool consistently undermines the Union's credibility as a strong and resolute actor on the international stage,
ker mora biti izbira sankcij pravična, pravilna in inteligentna, in ker prebivalci v nobenem primeru ne smejo biti prve žrtve teh sankcij,
whereas sanctions must be chosen in a fair, measured and intelligent way, and whereas the people of the country concerned must in no circumstances be the primary victims of these sanctions,
ker ima Unija na tem področju resnično politiko spodbujanja k reformam, vendar njen polni potencial ni izkoriščen iz političnih razlogov ter zlasti zaradi pomanjkanja soglasja v EU o pomenu spodbujanja demokracije in spoštovanja človekovih pravic v nasprotju z drugimi prednostnimi nalogami; ker načeloma ni strukturnih ali pravnih ovir za usklajeno uporabo zunanjih finančnih instrumentov v podporo demokratizaciji,
whereas the Union has a genuine policy of incentives in this area with a view to providing leverage for reform, but whereas the full potential of these incentives has not been exploited, for political reasons and in particular because of a lack of consensus throughout the EU on the importance of promoting democracy and respect for human rights as opposed to other priorities; whereas in theory there is no structural or legal impediment to the coordinated use of the external financing instruments to support democratisation,
ker resolucija Generalne skupščine ZN št. 63/168 z dne 18. decembra 2008 poziva h globalnemu moratoriju na izvajanje smrtne kazni; ker je smrtna kazen še vedno uporabljena kot metoda kaznovanja v številnih državah sveta, v nekaterih primerih tudi za mladoletnike,
whereas Resolution 63/168 adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 18 December 2008 calls for a global moratorium on the use of the death penalty; whereas the death penalty is still used as a method of punishment in many countries of the world and in some cases even on minors,
ker je evropski instrument za demokracijo in človekove pravice (EIDHR) ključni element evropske politike zaradi svoje osredotočenosti na ukrepe, ki jih ni mogoče uresničiti z instrumenti za dvostransko sodelovanje,
whereas the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) is central to European policy by virtue of its focus on measures which cannot be implemented through bilateral cooperation instruments,
ker EIDHR omogoča financiranje misij EU za spremljanje volitev, ki so bistven instrument interakcije na področju utrditve demokracije, vendar je nadaljnje ukrepanje in izvajanje njihovih priporočil pogosto neuspešno,
whereas the EIDHR finances EU election observation missions, which are a crucial tool for interaction in the area of democratic consolidation, but whereas in many cases their recommendations have not been adequately followed up or implemented,
ker so te razmere posledica pomanjkanja politične volje vlad držav gostiteljic misij EU za spremljanje volitev, pa tudi nezmožnosti Evropske komisije in držav članic, da bi priporočila pospremile s posebnimi programi pomoči, zlasti za novo izvoljene parlamente,
whereas this situation may stem from a lack of political commitment on the part of the governments of the countries which host EU election observation missions and from the inability of the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the recommendations are followed up with specific support programmes, in particular for newly elected parliaments,
ker Evropski parlament še vedno ne razpolaga z dovolj natančnimi analizami, ki bi mu omogočile presoditi obseg podpore za demokracijo, ki jo nudi Unija skupaj z državami članicami; ker je to deloma rezultat preglednosti, dostopa do dokumentov in posvetovanj, ki jih Svet še vedno ni razrešil,
whereas the European Parliament does not yet have at its disposal sufficiently detailed studies which would enable it to assess the scope of the support for democracy provided by the Union, including its Member States; whereas this is partly the result of transparency, document-access and consultation issues which have not yet been resolved by the Council,
ker je uporaba načela popolnega izpolnjevanja pogojev edini način za doseganje ciljev resnične demokratizacije, resničnega spoštovanja človekovih pravic in resnično boljših gospodarskih možnosti za lokalno prebivalstvo; ker bi bilo treba načelo izpolnjevanja pogojev opredeliti skupaj z državami upravičenkami in se pri tem tesno posvetovati ne le z vladami, ampak tudi s civilno družbo, ob ustreznem upoštevanju resničnih potreb lokalnega prebivalstva,
whereas the only way to achieve the objectives of genuine democratisation, genuine respect for human rights and genuinely better economic prospects for local populations is to apply a principle of full conditionality; whereas this principle of conditionality should be defined together with beneficiary countries, in close consultation not only with governments but also with civil society, and with due respect for the real needs of local populations,
ker so politične stranke ter svobodno in pošteno izvoljeni parlamenti bistveni za vsako demokracijo in demokratičen proces ter ker podpora za evropski instrument za demokracijo in človekove pravice (EIDHR) in njegova uporaba še nista skladni s pomembnostjo teh akterjev v preteklosti,
whereas political parties and freely and fairly elected parliaments are centrally important to each democracy and democratisation process, and whereas support for, and application of, the EIDHR has not yet corresponded to the importance of these actors in the past,
ker je delo Agencije OZN za ženske bistveno za podpiranje žensk pri njihovem prispevanju k procesu demokratizacije in sodelovanju v njem,
whereas the work of UN Women is crucial to supporting women in their contribution to, and participation in, the process of democratisation,
ker med institucijami EU obstaja splošno soglasje glede večrazsežnosti, zapletenosti in dolgoročnosti demokracije, vendar Komisija in države članice pri načrtovanju in izvajanju ukrepov za podporo demokraciji niso upoštevale celotnega volilnega cikla,
whereas there is widespread consensus among the EU institutions as to the multi-dimensional, complex and long-term nature of democracy, but whereas the Commission and the Member States have not taken the full electoral cycle into account when programming and implementing measures in support of democracy,
ker so v državah, v katerih poteka demokratizacija, zlasti ženske in otroci v večji nevarnosti, da zapadejo v trgovino z ljudmi, tudi za namene prostitucije,
whereas in states undergoing democratisation, women and young children are particularly vulnerable to human trafficking, including for purposes of prostitution,
Nujna sprememba paradigme
Need for a paradigm shift
meni, da so temelji za uravnotežena strukturna partnerstva med tretjimi državami in EU možni le z demokracijami, ki temeljijo na pravni državi, tudi ob upoštevanju potreb in interesov obeh strani in zadevnega prebivalstva;
Believes that only democracies based on the rule of law can function as a foundation for balanced structural partnerships between third countries and the EU that are also in keeping with the needs and interests of both parties and their respective populations;
poudarja, da partnerstvo, ki temelji na dialogu in posvetovanju, krepi lastno odgovornost do procesov izgradnje demokracije in elementov demokratičnega upravljanja; poziva vse institucije EU, naj si bolj prizadevajo, da bi te dialoge uporabile na skladnejši, celovitejši in bolj usklajen način;
Stresses that partnerships based on dialogue and consultation enhance ownership of democracy-building processes and elements of democratic governance; calls on all EU institutions to make greater efforts to use these dialogues in a more coherent, consistent and coordinated manner;
meni, da se vloga EU kot „mehke sile“ v mednarodnem sistemu lahko utrdi le, če varstvo človekovih pravic pomeni resnično prednostno nalogo EU v njeni politiki do tretjih držav;
Considers that the EU's role as a ‘soft power’ in the international system can only be consolidated if protection of human rights constitutes a real priority for it in its policy towards third countries;
poudarja, da je bistvenega pomena, če naj ima EU verodostojno in dosledno zunanjo politiko ter podpira razvoj demokracije, da se vedno izvaja zgledna politika spoštovanja človekovih pravic in demokracije v EU in v njenih državah članicah zdaj in v prihodnje;
Points out that it is essential, if the EU is to have a credible, consistent foreign policy and support the development of democracy, that an exemplary policy of respect for human rights and democracy is always pursued within the EU and its Member States, both now and in the future;
meni, da boj proti revščini in odstranjevanje ovir za razvoj držav lahko odločilno prispevata k demokratičnim procesom;
Considers that combating poverty and removing obstacles to countries' development can make a decisive contribution to democratic processes;
ugotavlja, da so dogodki v severni Afriki in na Bližnjem vzhodu opozorili na to, da ima zgolj osredotočanje na varnost in stabilnost, predvsem na boj proti nezakonitim migracijam, svoje meje, saj ni zmanjšalo revščine in družbene nepravičnosti; poudarja, da je „varnost proti demokraciji“ neprava dilema, saj v družbi brez demokratične in odgovorne vlade ne more biti človekove varnosti; meni, da je v teh državah prišlo do določenega gospodarskega razvoja, vseeno pa njegove koristi niso pravično porazdeljene; zato meni, da mora postati vprašanje socialne pravičnosti in boja proti neenakostim bistveni cilj zunanje politike Unije, saj je nujen dejavnik izgradnje mirne, uspešne in demokratične družbe;
Notes that the events unfolding in North Africa and the Middle East have demonstrated the limitations of a focus on security – notably the fight against irregular migration – and stability, which has failed to reduce poverty and social injustice; stresses that ‘security versus democracy’ is a false dilemma since there can be no human security in a society without a democratic and accountable government; believes that, although there has been economic growth, its benefits have not been distributed fairly; considers therefore that the question of social justice and the fight against inequalities has to become an essential objective of the Union's external policy, as it is an indispensable factor in the building of a peaceful, prosperous and democratic society;
poudarja potrebo po paradigmi, ki bo temeljila na resničnem utrjevanju demokracije na podlagi lastnega trajnega in celovitega razvoja, ki koristi prebivalstvu in spoštuje pravno državo ter temeljne človekove pravice in svoboščine; meni, da mora EU spremljati oblikovanje okolja, ugodnega za razvoj demokratične družbe;
Highlights the need for a paradigm shift aimed at genuine consolidation of democracy on the basis of endogenous, sustainable and comprehensive development that benefits the population and respects the rule of law and basic human rights and freedoms; takes the view that the EU must encourage the establishment of an environment conducive to the development of a democratic society;
poudarja, da demokracija kot sistem vladanja zagotavlja mehanizme za razporejanje politične moči in obvladovanje sporov, ki so bistveni za stabilne in mirne družbe; vendar ugotavlja, da demokracije ne smejo umetno vsiliti tuji dejavniki, ampak mora izhajati od znotraj; meni, da ima lahko EU skupaj z mednarodno skupnostjo dejavno vlogo pri podpiranju procesov utrjevanja demokracije;
Stresses that democracy as a system of government provides mechanisms for allocating political power and managing conflict which are essential for stable and peaceful societies; notes, however, that democracy must be home-grown and cannot be artificially imposed by outside agents; argues that the EU, together with the international community, can play an active role in supporting democratic consolidation processes;
meni, da mora uspešen proces demokratizacije nujno obravnavati družbeni in gospodarski razvoj države, da bi se izpolnile temeljne pravice prebivalcev, kot je pravica do izobraževanja, zdravja in zaposlitve;
Considers that if a democratisation process is to be successful, it is crucial that it should address the social and economic development of the country concerned, in order to ensure that the inhabitants' basic rights, such as the right to education, health and employment, are met;
meni, da bi morali izkušnje demokratične tranzicije po propadu komunističnih diktatorskih režimov v srednji in vzhodni Evropi deliti z novimi demokratičnimi silami v severni Afriki in na širšem Bližnjem vzhodu; spodbuja Komisijo in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj dejavneje sodelujeta pri tekočem procesu demokratizacije v tej pomembni sosedski regiji; spodbuja evropske stranke, naj razvijejo programe za sodelovanje med strankami z novimi partnerji v vseh sosednjih regijah;
Takes the view that the experience of democratic transition following the collapse of communist dictatorships in Central and Eastern Europe should be shared with the newly emerging democratic forces in North Africa and the wider Middle East; encourages the Commission and the EEAS to be more actively engaged in the unfolding democratisation process in this important neighbouring region; encourages European parties to develop party-to-party cooperation programmes with emerging partners in all neighbourhood regions;
poudarja, da mora biti prednostna naloga odslej ta, da se obstoječi instrumenti in spodbude Unije, združeni v strategijah, prikrojenih razmeram v vsaki državi, uporabljajo še konkretneje in bolj energično ter se odpravijo neskladja in dvojna merila pri njihovem izvajanju, kar škoduje dojemanju Evrope in njeni zmožnosti izvajanja odločne in skladne zunanje politike; poudarja, da je za takšen pristop potrebna resnična sprememba politike, v okviru katere bodo demokracija, pravna država in človekove pravice postale temelj zunanje politike Unije, pri čemer ni dovolj, da se jih preoblikuje v politične cilje, temveč morajo tudi postati del njenega delovanja in strukture;
Emphasises that priority must now be given to making greater and more vigorous practical use of the Union's existing range of instruments and incentives, brought together in strategies tailored to the situation in each country, and to the elimination of inconsistencies and double standards in their implementation, which undermine perceptions of Europe and the latter's ability to implement a strong, consistent external policy; stresses that such an approach requires a genuine change of policy whereby democracy, the rule of law and human rights become a cornerstone of the Union's external policy, not only being translated into policy objectives, but also becoming part of its articulation and its very structure;
poziva, da se mednarodni sporazumi, strateški dokumenti po posameznih državah, akcijski načrti, programi splošnega sistem preferencialov+ in vsi drugi pogodbeni odnosi med Unijo in tretjimi državami okrepijo z natančnejšo opredelitvijo klavzul o človekovih pravicah, demokraciji in pravici domorodnih ljudstev do predhodnega posvetovanja, dobrega upravljanja, posebnih mehanizmov v primeru nespoštovanja (vsaj na temelju klavzul iz sporazuma iz Cotonouja), zavez, ki so povezane s posebnimi, izmerljivimi, dosegljivimi in časovno opredeljenimi merili za oceno doseženega napredka, ter z natančnim časovnim razporedom izvajanja; obžaluje, da si EU kljub klavzulam o človekovih pravicah v sporazumu iz Cotonouja velikokrat zatiska oči pred neprestanimi in sistematičnimi kršitvami človekovih pravic nekaterih vlad partneric tega sporazuma, in nadaljuje svoje odnose brez sprememb; poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme dosledne politike za odvračanje od kršitev človekovih pravic, na primer z zmanjšanjem finančnih sredstev za vlade, ki ne spoštujejo demokracije in človekovih pravic, s čimer jim bo ukinjena proračunska podpora, hkrati pa se bodo povečala finančna sredstva za okrepitev civilne družbe mimo teh vlad;
Calls for international agreements, country strategy papers, action plans, the GSP+ programme and all other contractual relations between the Union and third countries to be tightened up by means of more clearly worded clauses on human rights, democracy, the right of indigenous peoples to be consulted before decisions are taken, good governance, specific mechanisms in the event of non-compliance (based, at the very least, on those set out in the Cotonou Agreement), commitments coupled with specific, measurable, achievable, time-bound criteria for assessing the progress made, and a specific timetable for implementation; regrets that despite the human rights clauses in the Cotonou Agreement, the EU often turns a blind eye to continuing systematic human rights violations committed by some Cotonou partner governments, adopting a ‘business as usual’ relationship; calls on the Commission to adopt consistent policies aimed at discouraging human rights violations, such as reducing the financial envelopes for governments that fail to respect democracy and human rights, thus denying them budget support, while increasing financial resources to strengthen civil society which bypass those governments;
opozarja, da bi morali biti cilji skupne trgovinske politike popolnoma usklajeni s splošnimi cilji EU; ker se v skladu s členom 207 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije skupna trgovinska politika izvaja v okviru načel in ciljev zunanjega delovanja Unije, in ker mora v skladu s členom 3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji prispevati zlasti k trajnostnemu razvoju, odpravi revščine in varstvu človekovih pravic;
Recalls that the objectives of the common commercial policy should be fully coordinated with the EU's overall objectives; points out that, pursuant to Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the EU's common commercial policy must be conducted ‘in the context of the principles and objectives of the Union's external action’, and that, pursuant to Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union, it must contribute, inter alia, to sustainable development, the eradication of poverty and the protection of human rights;
poudarja pomen neprestanega spremljanja izvajanja sporazumov in glede tega poziva k izvajanju študij vpliva na človekove pravice in demokracijo, poleg študij o trajnostnem razvoju, da bi zagotovila stalno ocenjevanje sporazumov;
Emphasises the importance of constant monitoring of implementation of the agreements, and calls in this respect for the use of impact studies on human rights and democracy in addition to those on sustainable development in order to ensure continuing evaluation of the agreements;
meni, da se demokratična načela in vrednote lahko še dodatno okrepijo s spodbujanjem ratifikacije rimskega statuta Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, z dajanjem prednosti regijam, ki niso zadosti zastopane, da bi okrepili njegovo univerzalno naravo in boj proti nekaznovanosti, genocidu, vojnim zločinom in zločinom proti človeštvu;
Notes that democratic principles and values can be further encouraged by promoting ratification of the Rome Statute of the ICC, giving priority to the regions that are underrepresented, in order to reinforce its universal character and the fight against impunity, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity;
obžaluje, da Komisija zelo redko uporablja mehanizme, ki omogočajo preklic preferencialov, ki so bili dodeljeni v okviru splošnega sistema preferencialov +, v primeru kršenja z njim povezanih konvencij; obsoja stališče Komisije, ki kljub skladnim poročilom mnogih mednarodnih organizacij, zavrača začetek preiskav v več državah upravičenkah do splošnega sistema preferencialov +, za katere se sumi, da ne spoštujejo konvencij, katerih podpisnice so;
Deplores the fact that the Commission only very rarely implements mechanisms providing for the withdrawal of GSP+ preferences in the event of breaches of the related agreements; condemns the attitude adopted by the Commission, which, despite mutually corroborating reports from a number of international organisations, is refusing to open investigations into several countries which enjoy GSP+ status and which are strongly suspected of not observing agreements they have signed;
opozarja na odločno stališče Parlamenta v prid dejstvu, da se v vse prostotrgovinske sporazume vključijo pravno zavezujoče klavzule na socialnem in okoljskem področju ter na področju spoštovanja človekovih pravic, pri čemer bo minimalna osnova seznam konvencij, vsebovanih v Uredbi o splošnem sistemu preferencialov+;
Recalls the firm position adopted by Parliament in favour of including in all free trade agreements legally binding clauses on social and environmental aspects and respect for human rights, taking as a minimum basis the list of conventions contained in the GSP+ Regulation;
ponovno poudarja, da mora Evropski parlament strožje nadzorovati te vidike; zato zahteva, naj Svet in Komisija omogočita, da Evropski parlament sodeluje v vseh fazah pogajanj, ki so povezane s sprejemanjem, izvajanjem in prekinitvijo mednarodnih sporazumov s tretjimi državami, zlasti pri opredelitvi pogajalskih pooblastil pri novih sporazumih, še posebej na področju spodbujanja človekovih pravic, v dialogu s pridružitvenim svetom ali drugimi ustreznimi političnimi organi za upravljanje sporazuma, pri izvajanju zavez o demokraciji in v postopku odločanja o posvetovanju ali prekinitvi sporazuma;
Reaffirms that the European Parliament must supervise these aspects more closely; calls, therefore, on the Council and Commission to involve the European Parliament at every stage in the negotiation, conclusion, application and suspension of international agreements with third countries, including the process of defining the negotiating mandate for new agreements (in particular as regards the promotion of human rights), in dialogue within association councils or any other equivalent political body responsible for overseeing an agreement (as regards the honouring of commitments relating to democratisation), and in the process of deciding whether to launch consultation or suspend an agreement;