natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
, namenjenega temu, da se finančna pomoč donatorjev Unije v okviru postopkov partnerskih držav demokratično nadzoruje;
adopted by the Council of the European Union, which is aimed at ensuring that financial aid provided by EU donors is subject to democratic scrutiny as part of the processes implemented by partner countries;
opozarja na pomembno vlogo višjih institucij za nadzor nad javnimi financami pri pomoči nacionalnim parlamentom pri njihovi nadzorni vlogi nad stroški za razvoj ter pri spodbujanju učinkovitosti pomoči;
Draws attention to the important role played by supreme audit institutions in assisting national parliaments in their task of scrutinising development-related expenditure and promoting aid effectiveness;
opozarja na tveganje, da bi učinkovitost pomoči postala zelo tehnično vprašanje; poudarja, da je treba dati večji poudarek kazalnikom vpliva pomoči na razvoj in načinu, kako ta dejansko prispeva k izkoreninjenju revščine, spodbujanju enakosti med spoloma in zmanjšanju neenakosti in ustvarjanju bogastva; meni, da bosta tesnejše povezovanje javnih in zasebnih akterjev na terenu v zvezi z razvojem in vključitev izmenjave izkušenj pri izvajanju zavez iz Pariške resolucije in agende za ukrepanje iz Akre prispevala k izboljšanju agende učinkovitosti pomoči;
Points out the danger of adopting a highly technical approach to aid effectiveness; stresses the need to place greater emphasis on indicators showing the impact of aid on development and on how effectively it contributes to eradicating poverty, promoting gender equality, reducing inequalities and creating wealth; believes that closer involvement of public and private development actors and the absorption of lessons learned from the implementation of the commitments made in the Paris Declaration and the AAA will help to improve the aid effectiveness programme;
poziva Evropsko unijo k ponovnemu pregledu politik pri delitvi dela, da ne bi bila zanemarjena medsektorska vprašanja, kot so človekove pravice, socialna vključenost, enakost spolov, državljanstvo ali podnebne spremembe;
Calls on the EU to review its policies on division of labour so as to ensure that horizontal issues such as human rights, social inclusion, gender equality, citizenship and climate change are not overlooked;
poudarja, da je preglednost pomoči bistvena za zagotovitev lastništva nad pomočjo in njene učinkovitosti; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj bodo ambiciozne pri doseganju preglednosti pomoči s spodbujanjem uporabe mednarodnih mehanizmov, ki skušajo vzpostaviti merila na svetovni ravni, kot je mednarodna pobuda za preglednost pomoči (International Aid Transparency Initiative – IATI); poziva države članice, ki tega še niso storile, da pridružijo pobudi za preglednost pomoči in jo pričnejo izvajati;
Emphasises that aid transparency is essential in order to ensure both ownership and aid effectiveness; calls, therefore, on the Commission and Member States to adopt an ambitious stance on aid transparency by promoting at international level mechanisms that seek to establish global standards in this area, such as the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI); calls on the Member States that have not yet done so to sign up and implement the IATI;
poudarja, da je treba jasno oceniti morebitna tveganja pri povečanju udeležbe zasebnega sektorja ter da je zato treba opredeliti jasna merila za podporo projektom zasebnega sektorja, hkrati pa vzpostaviti močne mehanizme za oceno učinka, da bi zagotovili, da bodo naložbe v zasebni sektor trajnostne in skladne z dogovorjenimi mednarodnimi razvojnimi cilji ter da ne bodo vodile nazaj k vezani pomoči;
Maintains that it is important clearly to assess the potential risks associated with greater private-sector involvement, and that clear criteria for supporting private-sector projects should therefore be defined, while at the same time developing sound impact assessment mechanisms in order to ensure that private-sector investment is sustainable and consistent with agreed international development goals and does not mean a return to tied aid;
meni, da je enakost med spoloma prednostno področje pri oblikovanju razvojnih politik in zato poziva, naj se v celoti vključi v agendo učinkovitosti pomoči ter naj ženske organizacije sodelujejo v vseh razvojnih procesih;
Considers gender equality to be a priority in the shaping of development policies, and consequently calls for it to be fully integrated into the aid effectiveness agenda, and for women's organisations to play an active part in all development processes;
poudarja, da bi FVR-4 tudi z večjim vključevanjem novih donatorjev, zlasti držav, katerih pristop ne temelji na enotnih merilih na področju učinkovitosti, moral postaviti temelje za svetovno partnerstvo za bolj vključujoč razvoj, da se izboljša mednarodno upravljanje pomoči; 16 c. poziva EU, naj pri tem prevzame vodilno vlogo, da bi zagotovili skladnost pomoči iz takšnih držav z dogovorjenimi mednarodnimi načeli glede uradne razvojne pomoči; meni, da to ne bi smelo razvodeneti učinkovitosti pomoči in njenih temeljnih načel;
Stresses that the HLF-4 should also lay the foundations for a more inclusive global partnership for development, by involving emerging donors more closely, in particular those countries whose approach is not governed by the global norms on aid effectiveness; calls on the EU to take a leading role in this respect in order to ensure that aid from such countries is in accordance with agreed international principles in terms of official development assistance; takes the view that this should not lead to any watering down of aid effectiveness and the basic principles underpinning it;
meni, da bi moral biti Evropski parlament glede na svojo vlogo demokratičnega nadzornika še naprej vključen v ponovno opredelitev med trajanjem agende učinkovitosti pomoči, vključno z ustreznim sodelovanjem na srečanju v Busanu;
Maintains that, in view of its role in exercising democratic scrutiny, Parliament should continue to be involved in the ongoing recasting of the aid effectiveness programme, including through appropriate participation in the Busan meeting;
poziva Evropsko unijo in njene države članice, naj še naprej namenjajo svojo pozornost kakovosti pomoči in spodbujajo mednarodne cilje, usmerjene v razvoj;
Calls on the EU and its Member States to continue to give consideration to the quality of aid and to promote an international agenda which focuses on development;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 26. oktobra 2011 o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012, kakor ga je spremenil Svet – vsi oddelki (13110/2011 – C7-0247/2011 – 2011/2020(BUD) ), in pisnih predlogih sprememb št. 1/2012, ( KOM(2011)0372 in 2/2012 ( KOM(2011)0576 ) k predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012
European Parliament resolution of 26 October 2011 on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012 as modified by the Council – all sections (13110/2011 – C7-0247/2011 – 2011/2020(BUD) ) and letters of amendment Nos 1/2012 ( COM(2011)0372 and 2/2012 ( COM(2011)0576 ) to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012
ob upoštevanju člena 314 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in člena 106a Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo,
having regard to Article 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Committee,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2011 o splošnih smernicah za pripravo proračuna za leto 2012 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0114 .
having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2011 on general guidelines for the preparation of the 2012 budget Texts adopted , P7_TA(2011)0114 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2011 o načrtu prihodkov in odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2012 – oddelek I –Parlament Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0140 .
having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2011 on the estimates of revenue and expenditure of Parliament for the financial year 2012 - Section I - Parliament Texts adopted , P7_TA(2011)0140 .
ob upoštevanju predloga splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012, ki ga je Komisija predložila 26. maja 2011 ( KOM(2011)0300 ),
having regard to the Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012, which the Commission presented on 26 May 2011 ( COM(2011)0300 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. junija 2011 o pooblastilu za trialog o predlogu proračuna za leto 2012 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0296 .
having regard to its resolution of 23 June 2011 on the mandate for the trilogue on the 2012 Draft Budget Texts adopted , P7_TA(2011)0296 .
ob upoštevanju stališča o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2012, ki ga je Svet sprejel 25. julija 2011 (13110/2011 – C7-0247/2011 ),
having regard to the Position on the Draft general budget of the European Union adopted by the Council on 25 July 2011 (13110/2011 – C7-0247/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju pisnih predlogov spremembe št. 1/2012 in 2/2012 k splošnem proračunu Evropske unije za leto 2012, ki ju je Komisija predložila 17. junija 2011 in 16. septembra 2011,
having regard to Letters of Amendment No 1/2012 and 2/2012 to the Draft general Budget of the European Union for the financial year 2012 presented by the Commission on 17 June 2011 and 16 September 2011 respectively,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenj drugih zadevnih odborov ( A7-0354/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the other committees concerned ( A7-0354/2011 ),
ponavlja, da je spodbujanje pametnega, trajnostnega in vključujočega gospodarstva, ki z uresničevanjem sedmih vodilnih pobud strategije Evropa 2020 ustvarja delovna mesta in kakovostne zaposlitve, cilj, ki ga je soglasno potrdilo vseh 27 držav članic in institucije EU; opozarja, da bo uresničevanje te strategije zahtevalo ogromne v prihodnost usmerjene naložbe do leta 2020, katerih vrednost je Komisija v sporočilu z dne 19. oktobra 2010 o pregledu proračuna ocenila na nič manj kot 1.800 milijard EUR ( KOM(2010)0700 ); zato poudarja, da so te naložbe – tako na ravni EU kot na ravni držav članic – potrebne zdaj in da z njimi ne kaže odlašati;
Recalls that the promotion of a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy, which creates jobs and high-quality employment by delivering on the Europe 2020 strategy's seven flagship initiatives is a jointly endorsed goal of the 27 Member States and the EU institutions; recalls that the implementation of this strategy will require a huge amount of future-oriented investment up to 2020, estimated at no less than EUR 1 800 billion by the Commission in its communication of 19 October 2010 entitled ‘The EU Budget Review’( COM(2010)0700 ); underlines, therefore, that necessary investments - at both EU and Member State level - must be made now and delayed no longer;
opozarja, da mora biti strategija Evropa 2020 za pametno, vključujočo in trajnostno rast v središču proračunske strategije EU za leto 2012, da bi pomagali Evropi, da okreva po socialni krizi in da bo ob izhodu iz nje močnejša;
Recalls that, in order to help Europe recover from the crisis and come out stronger, the Europe 2020 strategy for a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth must be at the centre of the 2012 EU budgetary strategy for 2012;
znova opozarja, da proračuna EU nikakor ne bi smeli razumeti in vrednotiti samo kot finančni element, ki je dodatno breme državnim proračunom, temveč bi ga morali dojemati kot priložnost za nadgradnjo tistih pobud in naložb, ki so v interesu celotne Unije in ji prinašajo dodano vrednost, pri čemer jih večino sprejmeta Parlament in Svet v postopku soodločanja in so zato upravičene tudi na nacionalni ravni;
Recalls, once more, that the EU budget should in no way be perceived and evaluated simply as a financial item added as a burden to national budgets but, on the contrary, is to be understood as an opportunity to gear up those initiatives and investments that are of interest and of added value to the Union as a whole, most of them co-decided by Parliament and the Council and thus legitimised also at national level;
znova poudarja, da proračun EU dopolnjuje državne proračune in da jim daje zagon za spodbujanje rasti in zaposlovanja, ter opozarja, da ga glede na njegovo naravo in omejeno velikost, ne bi smeli omejevati s samovoljnim zmanjševanjem proračunskih sredstev, temveč bi bilo treba, ravno nasprotno, povečati sredstva za ciljna področja;
Reiterates the complementary nature of the EU budget to national budgets and the impetus it creates to promote growth and jobs and underlines that given its very nature and limited size it should not be checked and curbed by arbitrary reductions but on the contrary targeted areas need to be reinforced;
priznava, da je pomanjkanje sredstev v EU hudo, tako na ravni držav članic kot na ravni Unije; poudarja, da bi morali z dejanskim upoštevanjem koncepta ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe temeljito analizirati izvedljivost, učinkovitost in uspešnost vseh programov in odhodkov;
Recognises that there is an acute shortage of funds in the EU, both at Member State and Union levels; stresses that, through attaching real importance to the concept of value for money, all programmes and expenditure should be carefully analysed for viability, efficiency and effectiveness;
poudarja, da razlike do zgornjih meja v večletnem finančnem okviru ne omogočajo resničnega manevrskega prostora, zlasti v podrazdelku 1a in razdelku 4, in zmanjšujejo zmožnost Unije za odzivanje na spremembe politik in nepredvidene potrebe, ne da bi ogrozila svoje prednostne naloge; poudarja, da bi bila zaradi obsežnih izzivov, s katerimi se srečuje Unija, potrebna sredstva, ki bi precej presegala sedanje zgornje meje večletnega finančnega okvira; v zvezi s tem opozarja, da se zaradi različnih izzivov in novih prednostnih nalog, ki so se pojavili v tem letu, na primer arabske pomladi in potrebe po močnem zagonu pri izvajanju strategije Evropa 2020 kot usklajenega načina za boj proti trenutni gospodarski in socialni krizi, ne bo mogoče izogniti uporabi instrumentov, predvidenih v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju;
Points out that the margins stemming from the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) do not allow real room for manoeuvre, especially in subheading 1a and heading 4, and reduce the capacity of the Union to react to policy changes and unforeseen needs while maintaining its priorities; points out that the scope of the challenges the Union faces, would require means well beyond the current ceilings of the MFF; recalls, in that respect, that the mobilisation of the instruments foreseen in the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management has been rendered unavoidable by the various challenges and new priorities that have arisen, such as the Arab Spring this year and the need to give a strong impetus to the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy as a coordinated way to fight the current economic and social crisis;
obžaluje, da je Svet predlog proračuna, ki ga je pripravila Komisija, zmanjšal za 1,59 milijarde EUR v sredstvih za prevzem obveznosti (–1,08 %) in za 3,65 milijarde EUR v sredstvih za plačila (–2,75 %), kar pomeni, da je skupaj na voljo 146,25 milijarde EUR za prevzem obveznosti (ali +2,91 % v primerjavi s proračunom 2011 Vključno s spremembami proračuna od 1, 2, 3/2011.
Regrets the Council cuts to the Commission's Draft budget (DB) of EUR 1,59 billion in commitments (-1,08%) and of EUR 3,65 billion in payments (-2,75%), which lead to overall amounts of EUR 146,25 billion in commitments (or +2,91% as compared to 2011 Budget Including Amending Budgets 1 to 3/2011.
) in 129,09 milijarde EUR za plačila (+2,02 %) – predlog proračuna Komisije je za primerjavo predvideval za 4,03 % večje obveznosti in za 4,91 % večja plačila kot lanski proračun (ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe št. 1/2012);
) and EUR 129,09 billion in payments (+2,02%) - to be compared to respectively +4,03 and +4,91% as per Commission's DB (including Amending Letter No 1/2012);
ugotavlja, da je Svet predlagal zmanjšanje več sto proračunskih vrstic, povečanja pa nobenega; poudarja, da so bili na tak način pavšalno zmanjšani vsi razdelki večletnega finančnega okvira, vendar ne v enakem obsegu;
Notes that the Council proposed cuts for several hundreds of budget lines, while proposing no single reinforcement; underlines that these linear cuts are spread over all headings of the MFF, although not to the same extent;
opozarja na nekatere neskladnosti teh zmanjšanj s stališči, ki jih je pred kratkim zavzel Svet, na primer zmanjšanja v predlogu proračuna 2012 v proračunskih vrsticah novoustanovljenih agencij za finančni nadzor, za katerih ustanovitev se je sicer zavzemal, zdaj pa očitno ne želi zagotoviti potrebnih finančnih sredstev za njihovo ustrezno delovanje;
Points out some of the inconsistencies of these cuts compared with the positions taken recently by the Council, such as the cuts it has made in the DB 2012 on the budgetary lines of the newly created agencies for financial supervision the creation of which it has pushed for but for which it does not seem willing to provide the necessary financial means to operate satisfactorily;
razume pomisleke Sveta glede gospodarskih in proračunskih omejitev na nacionalni ravni; meni, da bi morala Unija izkazati proračunsko odgovornost, vendar opozarja, da proračun EU po določbah Pogodbe ne sme imeti javnofinančnega primanjkljaja; poudarja še, da proračun EU predstavlja 2 % celotne javne porabe v Uniji;
Acknowledges the Council's concern about economic and budgetary constraints at national level; believes that the Union should show budgetary responsibility, but recalls that under Treaty provisions the EU budget cannot run a public deficit; and that the EU budget represents 2 % of total public spending in the Union;
obžaluje, da je Svet v teh okoliščinah in kljub vnaprejšnjim pozivom Parlamenta horizontalno zmanjšal proračun in se že vnaprej odločil o skupnem znesku proračunskih sredstev, ne da bi ustrezno upošteval natančno oceno dejanskih potreb za doseganje dogovorjenih ciljev in uresničevanje političnih zavez Unije, pa tudi ne prednostnih nalog Parlamenta, predstavljenih v omenjeni resoluciji z dne 23. junija 2011 o pooblastilu za trialog;
Deplores, against this background and despite previous calls from Parliament, that the Council has made horizontal cuts in the budget, deciding on the overall level of appropriations a priori, without duly taking into account an accurate assessment of the actual needs for the achievement of the Union's agreed objectives and political commitments, nor the priorities by Parliament, as presented in its abovementioned resolution of 23 June 2011 on the mandate for the trilogue;
poudarja, da je preučevanje preteklih stopenj izvrševanja in stopenj povečanja v primerjavi s proračunom za prejšnje leto kot edina osnova za izbiro vrstic in zneskov, ki jih je treba zmanjšati, v preteklost usmerjen pristop, ki v okviru večletnega načrtovanja ne odraža ustrezno pospeševanja izvrševanja v obdobju več let;
Emphasises that the sole consideration of past implementation rates, together with the rates of increase as compared to previous year's budget, as a basis for selecting lines and amounts to be cut is a backward-looking approach which does not allow, in the context of multiannual programming, to properly reflect the speeding up of implementation along the years;
ugotavlja, da bi nizka raven plačil, ki jo predlaga Svet, privedla do večjega odstopanja med plačili in prevzetimi obveznostmi, kar bo samodejno povzročilo povečanje neporavnanih obveznosti ob koncu leta, zlasti v podrazdelkih 1a in 1b; v zvezi s tem opozarja na že izredno visok znesek nabranih neporavnanih obveznosti tik pred iztekom tega večletnega finančnega okvira;
Notes that the low level of payments proposed by the Council would lead to a bigger discrepancy between payment appropriations and commitment appropriations, mechanically resulting in an increase of outstanding commitments (RALs) at year end, particularly in subheadings 1a and 1b; warns in this context of the already extremely large amount of accumulated RAL so close to the end of this MFF;
določa, da bo skupna raven proračunskih sredstev znašala 147 763,82 milijona EUR za prevzem obveznosti in 133 143,18 milijona EUR za plačila;
Sets the overall level of appropriations to EUR 147 763,82 million and 133 143,18 million in respectively commitment and payment appropriations,
opozarja, da so politike strategije Evropa 2020 po mnenju Parlamenta med najpomembnejšimi prednostnimi nalogami Gl. resolucijo Parlamenta o pooblastilu za trialog, kot je bila sprejeta 23. junija 2011.
Recalls that Europe 2020 policies have been identified by Parliament as one of its most important priorities See for instance Parliament's resolution for the mandate of the trilogue, as adopted on 23 June 2011.
proračuna za leto 2012, saj so bistveni in nujni elementi strategije EU za oživitev gospodarstva; poudarja, da predlagano povečanje sredstev za izbrano število proračunskih postavk služi tako kratko- in dolgoročnim strategijam za prihodnost Unije;
for the 2012 budget since they are essential and necessary parts of the EU strategy for the economic recovery; emphasises that the proposed increase in appropriations for a selected number of budget items serves both short- and long-term strategies for the future of the Union;
meni, da je raven plačil, ki jo je predlagala Komisija, minimalen še sprejemljiv znesek, kar sta v več izjavah omenila tudi predsednik Barroso in komisar Lewandowski; ni prepričan, da je osnutek izjave Sveta št. 1 o sredstvih za plačila, katere namen je nasloviti vprašanje morebitnih potreb po dodatnih plačilih, ustrezna rešitev za ta problem, zlasti glede na izkušnje iz začetka leta 2011, ko Svet ni želel spoštovati podobne izjave, ki jo je podal v zvezi s proračunom za leto 2011; zato je sklenil obnoviti večino plačil na raven iz predloga proračuna, še posebej zato, ker zmanjšanje plačil, ki ga je predlagal Svet, zadeva tudi področja in proračunske vrstice, namenjene ciljem strategije Evropa 2020, zlasti v razdelkih 1a in 1b;
Considers that the level of payments proposed by the Commission is a bare minimum for payments, as also mentioned in several statements by President Barroso and Commissioner Lewandowski; is not confident that Council's draft statement No1 on payment appropriations aiming at addressing the issue of possible additional payment needs is of any help in this respect, notably in light of early 2011 experience, when Council happened to be reluctant to honour the similar statement it initiated for the 2011 budget; therefore also decides to restore most payment appropriations to DB levels, all the more so because Council cuts in payments also affect areas and budget lines falling under Europe 2020 objectives, particularly in subheadings 1a and 1b;
Podrazdelek 1a
On subheading 1a
opozarja, da je razdelek 1a ključni razdelek večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013 kar zadeva uresničitev ciljev strategije Evropa 2020, in sicer zaradi posrednih ali neposrednih prispevkov k financiranju vseh petih osrednjih ciljev in sedmih vodilnih pobud te strategije;
Recalls that subheading 1a is the key heading of the MFF 2007-2013 in terms of reaching the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy, thanks to its direct or indirect contribution to the financing of all its five headline targets and the seven flagship initiatives;