natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
za krepitev evropske konkurenčnosti predlaga, naj ocene učinka identificirajo specifične – pozitivne in negativne – posledice, ki jih bodo imeli ukrepi na konkurenčnost in rast v Evropski uniji; meni, da bi bilo treba te učinke, kolikor je le mogoče, v celoti izmeriti;
Suggests in the context of strengthening European competitiveness that impact assessments should identify the particular effects – both positive and negative – that measures will have on competitiveness and growth within the European Union; considers that these effects should as far as possible be fully quantified;
odločno podpira predlog, naj se ob dodatnih stroških za podjetja zaradi novih zakonov določi stroškovna izravnava, s katero bi se v največji možni meri zmanjšala regulativna obremenitev drugje; meni, da je to ključni vidik prihodnjih programov, s katerim se bo zmanjšalo breme in se bo izboljšal celotni zakonodajni okvir za podjetja;
Strongly endorses the proposal that, where new laws impose a cost on businesses, equivalent cost offsets should be identified, which would reduce as far as possible the regulatory burden elsewhere; considers this to be a key aspect of future programmes which will reduce burdens and improve the regulatory framework for businesses as a whole;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba ocenjeno težo upravnih in regulativnih obremenitev izražati v neto in ne v bruto vrednostih;
Points out that the assessed weight of administrative and regulatory burdens should be expressed in net rather than gross figures;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri pripravi nove zakonodaje še posebej pazi na morebitni učinek na mala in srednja podjetja; poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva, da predpisi ne bi veljali za mala in srednja podjetja, če bi nanje vplivali nesorazmerno in ne bi bilo res dobrega razloga za njihovo vključitev v področje uporabe zakonodaje; odločno meni, da bi lahko take določbe blažile učinke predpisov in ugodno vplivale na njihovo izvajanje in uporabnost, zlasti za mala- in mikropodjetja; poziva vse institucije EU, naj upoštevajo člen 153(2b) PDEU, ki določa, da se morajo izogibati sprejemanju predpisov, ki bi uvajali upravne, finančne in zakonske omejitve, katere bi lahko zavirale ustanavljanje in razvoj malih in srednjih podjetij;
Urges the Commission, when formulating new legislation, to place the utmost importance on its possible impact on small and medium-sized enterprises; calls on the Commission to seek to exempt SMEs from regulation where provisions would disproportionately affect them and there is no robust reason for including them in the scope of the legislation; strongly believes that such mitigation provisions would have a positive effect on the implementation and usability of regulation, particularly for small and micro-sized enterprises; calls on all EU institutions to abide by Article 153(2b) of the TFEU, which requires them to avoid passing laws which impose administrative, financial and legal constraints that hold back the creation and development of SMEs;
v tej zvezi meni, da ima ključno vlogo test MSP, sprejet z zakonom o malih podjetjih, in pričakuje, da ga bo Komisija v celoti uporabljala; poudarja, da mora Komisija zagotoviti usklajeno izvajanje testa MSP v vseh direktoratih Komisije, države članice pa spodbuja, naj podobne teste vključijo v svoje nacionalne postopke odločanja; poziva vse parlamentarne odbore, naj načela testa MSP uporabijo pri zakonodajnih poročilih, o katerih je pristojni odbor že glasoval in ki bodo predloženi v odobritev na plenarnem zasedanju;
Takes the view in this regard that the SME test adopted in the Small Business Act has a key role to play, and expects the Commission to make full use of the test; stresses the need for the Commission to ensure consistent application of the SME test across Directorates within the Commission, and encourages the Member States to include similar considerations in their national decision-making processes; calls on all the parliamentary committees to apply the principles of the SME test to legislative reports when they have been voted on by the relevant committee and are being submitted to plenary for approval;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da namerava Komisija še v letu 2011 predložiti zakonodajni predlog o uporabi nadomestnih postopkov za reševanje sporov, da bi zagotovila hiter in učinkovit dostop do mehanizmov za izvensodno reševanje sporov;
Notes the Commission's intention to submit later in 2011 a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute settlement mechanisms, with a view to securing rapid and effective access to the out-of-court settlement of disputes.
poziva Svet, naj v skladu s svojo izjavo iz točke 34 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje od držav članic zahteva, da pripravljajo in objavljajo razpredelnice, kjer bo prikazano ujemanje med direktivami in nacionalnimi ukrepi za prenos; poudarja, da so te korelacijske razpredelnice bistvenega pomena za preglednost glede tega, kako se obveznosti iz direktiv EU prenašajo v nacionalno zakonodajo; poudarja, da ima lahko uporaba korelacijskih tabel koristno vlogo pri ugotavljanju neskladij in primerov prestrogih predpisov;
Demands that the Council, in accordance with its own statement in point 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, require Member States to draw up and publish tables illustrating the correlation between directives and national transposition measures; stresses that such correlation tables are essential in order to provide transparency on how national law transposes the obligations in EU directives; emphasises that the use of correlation tables can play a useful role in identifying discrepancies and cases of gold-plating;
poziva Komisijo, naj gradi na uspešnih programih boljše priprave zakonodaje in upravne poenostavitve v državah članicah, vključno s široko uporabo elektronskih postopkov;
Calls on the Commission to build on the successful programmes of better lawmaking and of administrative simplification in the Member States, including the extensive use of electronic procedures;
poudarja, da bi se morala veljavna zakonodaja vedno spreminjati s prenovitvijo; obenem priznava in spoštuje pravice Komisije v zakonodajnem postopku;
Stresses that the recasting technique should always be used when amending legislation; at the same time recognises and respects the Commission's rights in the legislative process;
poziva k izboljšanju zbirke podatkov EUR-Lex, da bi ta postala preglednejša in prijaznejša za uporabnike;
Calls for the EUR-Lex database to be improved in order to make it more transparent and ‘user friendly’;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj konstruktivno sodelujeta z Evropskim parlamentom za nemoteno delovanje sistema delegiranih in izvedbenih aktov v praksi;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to work together with Parliament in a constructive manner in order to ensure that the new system of delegated and implementing acts works smoothly in practice;
pozdravlja širšo uporabo naknadnega vrednotenja zakonodaje, ki se izvaja; vseeno poudarja, da bi bilo treba takšno vrednotenje izvajati za vse pomembne predpise, ne samo za ključna področja; v tej zvezi ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba obravnavati tudi izvedbene in delegirane akte; poziva Komisijo, naj naknadno vrednotenje kar se da razširi na vsa področja politike, in predlaga, naj se v predpise kot uporabno sredstvo za jamčenje, da je veljavna ureditev še vedno nujna in sorazmerna, pogosteje vključujejo klavzule o časovni omejitvi veljavnosti – predvsem v obliki obvezno predpisanih datumov pregleda, z možnostjo, da se po potrebi in želji določi samodejni potek veljavnosti v zakonodaji vsebovanih določb;
Welcomes the wider use of ex-post evaluation of implemented legislation; emphasises, however, that such evaluation should be used for all significant legislation, not only in key sectors; notes in this regard that implementing and delegated acts should also come under consideration; calls on the Commission to expand ex-post evaluation as far as possible to all policy areas, and suggests that increased inclusion of ‘sunset’ clauses – primarily in the form of obligatory prescribed review dates, with the option, if appropriate and desirable, of designating automatic expiry of provisions contained in the legislation – could be a useful means of guaranteeing that regulations still in force are necessary and proportionate;
poziva Komisijo, naj zlasti pregleda vse uredbe o financiranju, da bi se zmanjšala upravna obremenitev za prosilce subvencij EU in da bi bil celoten postopek za vložitev zahtevkov učinkovitejši;
Asks the Commission to review, in particular, all the funding regulations in order to reduce the administrative burden for applicants for EU subsidies with a view to making the whole application procedure more efficient;
pozdravlja osebno podporo predsednika Komisije načrtu za pametno pravno ureditev; meni, da je vprašanje tako pomembno, da potrebuje resnično politično spodbudo Komisije, da bo ostalo visoko na političnem dnevnem redu; v tej zvezi predlaga, naj se ga obravnava kot osrednjo nalogo v portfelju enega od komisarjev; se zaveda, da bi moral Parlament proučiti metode za to, kako bi boljši pripravi zakonodaje pripisovali večji pomen v odborih, in meni, da bi bilo treba dodatno razmisliti o možnosti, da bi vprašanje obravnavali na sejah, kjer bi sodelovali različni odbori;
Welcomes the personal support the President of the Commission has given to the Smart Regulation agenda; considers the issue to be of sufficient importance that real political leadership is required from the Commission to keep this issue high on the political agenda, and in this regard suggests that the agenda be brought forward as a key part of the portfolio for one of the College of Commissioners; notes that, for its part, Parliament should investigate methods to increase the importance attached to better law-making within its committees, and considers that the use of inter-committee meetings to address this issue requires further consideration;
je zadovoljen, da Komisija na podlagi posameznih ključnih primerov nadaljuje prakso preverjanja tega, kako institucije EU in nacionalni parlamenti izvajajo načelo subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, zaradi česar je poročilo o boljši pripravi zakonodaje jasnejše;
Appreciates the Commission's continuation of its practice of examining the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality by the Union institutions and the national parliaments on the basis of individual ‘key cases’, thus improving the clarity of the ‘Better Lawmaking’ report;
se obvezuje, da bo pozorno spremljal, kako bo Komisija izvajala načrt za pametno pravno ureditev, in pozdravlja poročilo o napredku, načrtovano za drugo polovico leta 2012;
Undertakes to remain vigilant in monitoring the Commission's implementation of the smart regulation agenda, and looks forward to the progress report scheduled for the second half of 2012;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. septembra 2011 o dejavnostih Odbora za peticije v letu 2010 ( 2010/2295(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 14 September 2011 on the activities of the Committee on Petitions in 2010 ( 2010/2295(INI) )
ob upoštevanju členov 24, 227, 258 in 260 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 24, 227, 258 and 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju členov 10 in 11 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
having regard to Articles 10 and 11 of the Treaty on European Union,
ob upoštevanju členov 48 in 202(8) Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 48 and 202(8) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A7-0232/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0232/2011 ),
ker priznava pomen postopka vlaganja peticij in njegove posebne značilnosti, ki bi morale pristojnemu odboru omogočati, da poišče rešitve za državljane EU, ki Parlamentu predložijo peticijo, ter jih zagovarja,
bearing in mind the importance of the petitions process and its specific attributes, which should enable the committee responsible to seek and provide solutions and to defend EU citizens who petition Parliament,
ker je treba zagotoviti večjo udeležbo državljanov v postopkih odločanja v Evropski uniji, da se okrepita njena legitimnost in odgovornost,
whereas it is necessary to increase citizen participation in the EU decision-making process, with a view to reinforcing its legitimacy and accountability,
ker Parlament neposredno zastopa državljane Evropske unije, ki jim njihova pravica do vložitve peticije omogoča, da se obrnejo na svoje predstavnike, kadar menijo, da so bile njihove pravice kršene in da je za njihovo pritožbo pristojna Evropska unija,
whereas citizens of the EU are directly represented by Parliament, and the right of petition offers them the means to address their representatives if they consider that their rights have been infringed and if the subject of their petition comes within the field of activity of the European Union,
ker ima izvrševanje evropske zakonodaje neposredne posledice za državljane in prebivalce EU in ker lahko prav ti najbolje ocenijo njeno učinkovitost in pomanjkljivosti, pa tudi opozorijo na vrzeli, ki jih je treba zapolniti, da se zagotovi čim boljša uporaba zakonodaje Unije v posameznih državah članicah, in ker mora Odbor za peticije postati prednostni sogovornik,
whereas the implementation of European legislation has a direct impact on EU citizens and residents, who are the best placed to assess its effectiveness and its shortcomings and to signal remaining loopholes that need to be closed to ensure better implementation of EU legislation by the Member States, and whereas the Committee on Petitions should become a priority contact,
ker ima prek Odbora za peticije dolžnost raziskati ta vprašanja in poiskati čim boljše rešitve za državljane in ker v ta namen vse tesneje sodeluje s Komisijo, evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic, drugimi parlamentarnimi odbori in organi, agencijami in evropskimi omrežji ter z državami članicami,
whereas Parliament, through its Committee on Petitions, is obliged to investigate such issues and offer citizens the most appropriate remedies, and is therefore stepping up cooperation with the Commission, the European Ombudsman, other parliamentary committees, European bodies, agencies and networks and Member States,
ker države članice kljub temu v določenih primerih še vedno niso pripravljene dejavno sodelovati s pristojnim odborom in se na primer ne udeležujejo njegovih sej in ne odgovarjajo na prejeto pošto, kar je dokaz nelojalnosti v sodelovanju z institucijo,
whereas, however, in some cases Member States remain reluctant to cooperate actively with the responsible committee, and fail, for example, to attend meetings of the committee or to reply to letters sent to them; whereas this denotes a failure to cooperate with the institution in good faith,
ker vseeno priznava, da mnoge države članice z njim dobro sodelujejo in si prizadevajo odgovoriti na skrbi državljanov, ki jih ti izražajo z vlaganjem peticij,
recognising, however, that many Member States demonstrate a good level of cooperation and work with Parliament in an effort to respond to the concerns of citizens as expressed through the petitions process,
ker priznava prispevek služb Komisije k postopku obravnavanja peticij, saj zagotavljajo predhodne ocene številnih prejetih peticij,
recognising the contribution made to the petitions process by the services of the Commission, which provide preliminary assessments of many petitions received,
ker je treba zaradi specializiranosti peticij in raznolikosti tem, na katere se nanašajo, tesneje sodelovati z drugimi parlamentarnimi odbori, da jih bo mogoče zaprositi za mnenja, nujno potrebna za ustrezno obravnavo peticij,
whereas the degree of specialisation of petitions and the wide variety of issues addressed necessitates closer cooperation with the other parliamentary committees, so that their opinions – which are indispensible in dealing with petitions properly – may be requested,
ker se je število peticij, ki jih je Parlament prejel leta 2010, v primerjavi z letom 2009 nekoliko zmanjšalo (1655 v primerjavi s 1924, kar je za 14 % manj),
whereas the number of petitions received by Parliament in 2010 was slightly lower than that recorded in 2009 (i.e. 1 655 as compared with 1 924 – a drop of 14 %),
ker je dobro sodelovanje s pristojnimi službami Parlamenta v letu 2010 pomenilo, da 91 pritožb (4,7 %) državljanov ni bilo registriranih, saj niso izpolnjevale minimalnih meril, po katerih bi jih lahko obravnavali kot peticije, kar je v skladu s priporočili iz letnega poročila za leto 2009, da se ne registrira peticij, ki ne izpolnjujejo minimalnih pogojev,
whereas successful cooperation with the relevant services at Parliament in 2010 meant that 91 complaints (4.7 %) filed by citizens were rejected for failing to meet the minimum criteria to qualify as petitions, as per the recommendations in the 2009 annual report, which stated that petitions not meeting the necessary conditions should not be recorded,
ker bi bilo treba zaradi števila nedopustnih peticij, prejetih v letu 2010 (40 %), posebno pozornost nameniti obveščanju državljanov o pristojnostih Odbora za peticije in vlogi različnih institucij Unije;
whereas the number of inadmissible petitions received in 2010 (40 %) indicates that efforts should continue to be made to raise citizens' awareness of the competences of the Committee on Petitions and the role of the various EU institutions,
ker bi postopek peticij lahko dopolnjeval druge evropske instrumente, ki jih imajo na voljo državljani, kot je na primer naslavljanje pritožb na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic ali na Komisijo,
whereas the petitions process could complement other measures open to citizens at EU level, such as the filing of complaints with the European Ombudsman or the Commission,
ker imajo državljani pravico do hitrega in učinkovitega reševanja njihovih težav in ker je Parlament Komisijo večkrat zaprosil, naj kot varuhinja pogodb uporabi svoje posebno pooblastilo ter ukrepa proti kršitvam evropske zakonodaje, ki so jih razkrili vlagatelji peticij, zlasti kršitvam zakonodaje Evropske unije pri prenosu na nacionalno raven,
whereas citizens are entitled to speedy and solution-oriented redress and whereas Parliament has repeatedly asked the Commission to use its prerogatives as guardian of the Treaty to act against breaches of European legislation revealed by petitioners, especially where the transposition of EU legislation at national level results in its infringement,
ker mnoge peticije še vedno opozarjajo na pomanjkljivosti pri prenosu in izvajanju evropske zakonodaje s področja notranjega trga in okolja in ker je Odbor za peticije Komisijo že večkrat pozval, naj na teh področjih poskrbi za strožji in učinkovitejši nadzor nad izvajanjem zakonodaje,
whereas many petitions continue to raise concerns about the transposition and implementation of European legislation on the environment and the internal market, and whereas the Committee on Petitions has already called on the Commission to ensure that enforcement checks in these areas are strengthened and made more efficient,
ker lahko Komisija v celoti preveri skladnost z zakonodajo Evropske unije šele, ko so nacionalni organi že sprejeli končno odločitev, ker pa je treba – zlasti pri okoljskih zadevah – že v zgodnji fazi preveriti, ali lokalne, regionalne in nacionalne oblasti pravilno izvajajo vse ustrezne postopkovne zahteve zakonodaje Evropske unije, vključno z upoštevanjem previdnostnega načela,
whereas, although the Commission can fully check compliance with EU law only when a final decision has been taken by national authorities, it is important – particularly in relation to environmental matters – to verify at an early stage that local, regional and national authorities correctly apply all relevant procedural requirements under EU law, including implementation of the principle of precaution,
ker so številne peticije vezane na projekte z možnimi posledicami za okolje in bi bilo zato dobro, če bi Odbor te peticije, ki se nanašajo na projekte, glede katerih poteka preiskava v javnem interesu, obravnaval na način, ki bi omogočal optimalno sprejemanje odločitev tako za vlagatelje kot za napredovanje projekta,
whereas, given that very many petitions relate to projects with a potential environmental impact, it would be desirable for the Committee on Petitions to consider treating such petitions, relating to projects which are the subject of a public inquiry, in a way which optimises the committee's decision-making time vis-à-vis both the petitioner and the state of progress of the project,
ker je treba preprečiti dodatne nepovratne izgube biotske raznolikosti, zlasti na zaščitenih območjih Natura 2000, in ker so se države članice zavezale varovanju posebnih ohranitvenih območij iz direktive o habitatih (92/43/EGS) in direktive o pticah (79/409/EGS),
bearing in mind the importance of preventing further irreparable losses in biodiversity, especially inside Natura 2000 designated sites, and the commitment by Member States to guarantee protection of special conservation areas under the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) and the Birds Directive (79/409 EEC),
ker peticije opozarjajo na vpliv evropske zakonodaje na vsakdanje življenje državljanov Unije; ker je treba sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za utrditev doseženega napredka pri krepitvi pravic državljanov Unije,
whereas petitions highlight the impact of European legislation on the everyday lives of EU citizens; whereas all necessary steps to consolidate the progress achieved in reinforcing European citizens' rights need to be taken,
ker znatno število peticij ostaja nerešenih, saj je Komisija sprožila postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev, zaradi česar je Odbor za peticije v prejšnjem poročilu o delu in v mnenju o letnem poročilu Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti zaprosil Komisijo, naj ga redno obvešča o fazah, v katerih so postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev iz peticij,
whereas, bearing in mind the significant number of petitions pending subject to infringement procedures launched by the Commission, the Committee on Petitions, in its previous activity report and its opinion on the Commission's annual report on monitoring the application of Community law, requested regular updates on the progress of infringement procedures related to petitions,
ker je Odbor za peticije po misijah za ugotavljanje dejstev v Huelvi (Španija), Kampaniji (Italija) in Vorarlbergu (Avstrija) pripravil priporočila v zvezi z ravnanjem s strupenimi in komunalnimi odpadki ter s prenosom direktive o okoljskih vplivih v nacionalno zakonodajo,
having regard to the recommendations on toxic and urban waste management and on transposition of the Environmental Impact Directive into national law made by the Committee on Petitions following the fact-finding missions to Huelva (Spain), Campania (Italy) and Vorarlberg (Austria),
ob upoštevanju odstavka 32 svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2010 o razpravah Odbora za peticije v letu 2009 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0261 .
having regard to paragraph 32 of its resolution of 6 July 2010 on the deliberations of the Committee of Petitions during the year 2009 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0261 .
, v katerem Parlament zahteva revizijo postopka evidentiranja peticij,
with regard to Parliament's request for the revision of the registration process for petitions,
ker je Odbor za pravne zadeve pripravil mnenje o peticiji 0163/2010, ki jo je vložil P.B.
whereas the Committee on Legal Affairs has given an opinion on Petition 0163/2010 by P.B.
meni, da je Odbor za peticije najprimernejše telo za spremljanje pobud evropskih državljanov, registriranih pri Komisiji;
Believes that the Committee on Petitions is the most suitable one to follow up the European citizens' initiatives registered with the Commission;
izraža željo, da bi tiste državljanske pobude, ki v zahtevanem roku niso prejele milijona podpisov, lahko napotili na Odbor za peticije Parlamenta, da bi ta o njih razpravljal bolj poglobljeno;
Hopes that citizens' initiatives which have not received a million signatures within the required time can be referred to Parliament's Committee on Petitions for more detailed discussion;