natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva k sporazumu v Durbanu o strogih pravilih glede rabe zemljišč, spreminjanja njihove namembnosti in gozdarstva, ki bodo krepila raven ambicij pogodbenic iz Priloge I in bodo oblikovana tako, da bodo zagotovila zmanjšanje emisij iz gozdarstva in rabe zemljišč, zahtevala, da bodo pogodbenice iz Priloge I odgovorne za vsako povečanje emisij zaradi rabe zemljišč, spreminjanja njihove namembnosti in gozdarstva, ter bodo skladna z obstoječimi zavezami partneric za varstvo in povečanje ponorov in zbiralnikov toplogrednih plinov, da se zagotovi okoljska neoporečnost prispevkov sektorja k zmanjšanju emisij; poziva, naj se poleg temeljitega obračunavanja LULUCF opredelijo politični ukrepi za priznavanje vrednosti skladiščenja ogljika v pridelanih lesnih izdelkih;
Calls for an agreement in Durban on robust rules on LULUCF that strengthen the level of ambition of the Annex I Parties, are designed to deliver emissions reductions from forestry and land use, require that Annex I Parties account for any increases in emissions from LULUCF and are consistent with the Parties' existing commitments to protect and enhance greenhouse gas sinks and reservoirs in order to ensure the environmental integrity of the sector's contribution to emissions reductions; in addition to sound LULUCF accounting, calls for policy measures to be defined in order to recognise the value of the carbon storage in harvested wood products;
meni, da se mora poročanje o uporabi zemljišč, spremembi namembnosti zemljišč in gozdarstvu (LULUCF) sklicevati na določeno preteklo izhodiščno leto/obdobje ter se mora uporabljati v okviru Kjotskega protokola in v okviru konvencije;
Considers that LULUCF reporting must be referenced to a fixed historical base year/period and applied across the Kyoto Protocol and Convention tracks;
v zvezi s tem poziva k obvezni vključitvi emisij (odstranjevanja in izpustov) iz upravljanja z gozdovi v zaveze pogodbenic iz Priloge I za zmanjšanje iz naslova LULUCF po letu 2012;
Calls in this respect for the mandatory inclusion of emissions (removals and releases) from forest management in Annex I Parties' post-2012 LULUCF reduction commitments;
poziva Komisijo, države članice in vse pogodbenice, naj sodelujejo v subsidiarnem organu za znanstveno in tehnološko svetovanje ter v drugih mednarodnih forumih za oblikovanje nove opredelitve gozdov ZN na osnovi biomov, ki bo izražala številne razlike v biotski raznovrstnosti ter vsebnosti ogljika različnih biomov, hkrati pa bo jasno ločevala med avtohtonimi gozdovi in tistimi, v katerih prevladujejo drevesne monokulture in neavtohtone vrste;
Calls on the Commission, the Member States and all Parties to work in the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice as well as other international fora to establish a new UN definition of forests on a biome basis, reflecting the wide-ranging differences in biodiversity as well as carbon values of different biomes, while clearly distinguishing between native forests and those dominated by tree monocultures and non-native species;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi predpostavke o ogljični nevtralnosti biomase, uporabljane za energetske namene, ki se uporablja v računovodstvu na podlagi okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja; poziva k določitvi novih in trdnejših računovodskih pravil, ki bodo izražala dejanski potencial bioenergije za prihranek toplogrednih plinov;
Notes with concern the assumption of carbon neutrality for biomass used for energy purposes which governs accounting under the UNFCCC; calls for the establishment of new and more robust accounting rules which reveal the true GHG saving potential of bioenergy;
spodbuja ustanovitev sklada za nagrajevanje ali zagotavljanje spodbud za zmanjšanje emisij s trajnostnim gospodarjenjem z zemljišči – z ohranjanjem gozdov, trajnim gospodarjenjem z gozdovi, preprečevanjem krčenja gozdov, pogozdovanjem in trajnostnim kmetijstvom;
Encourages the establishment of a fund to reward or provide incentives for reducing emissions through sustainable land-management practices, including forest conservation, sustainable forest management, the avoidance of deforestation, afforestation and sustainable agriculture;
poudarja, da je treba za zmanjšanje emisij zaradi krčenja in degradacije gozdov preiti z ozkega procesa ocene kroženja ogljika v gozdovih k širšemu pristopu, ki bi zajemal opredelitev posrednih in neposrednih dejavnikov krčenja gozdov ter temeljil na postopku posvetovanja, podobnega tistemu v prostovoljnem sporazumu o partnerstvu;
Recalls that, in order to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation of forest, there is a need to shift away from a narrow process of quantification of forest carbon fluxes towards a broader approach, including the identification of the direct and underlying drivers of deforestation, based on a consultation process similar to the Voluntary Partnership Agreement consultation process;
priznava potrebo po pravni varnosti v mehanizmu dolgoročnega financiranja ukrepov REDD+; poziva konferenco pogodbenic, naj opredeli mehanizem, ki bo mobiliziral nadaljnja finančna sredstva za ukrepe REDD+ iz javnih in zasebnih virov;
Recognises the need for regulatory certainty in a long-term financing mechanism for REDD+; urges the Conference of Parties to define a mechanism to mobilise further funding for REDD+ from public as well as private sources;
poudarja, da si je potrebno na COP 17 nadalje prizadevati za izvajanje REDD+ (zmanjšanje emisij zaradi krčenja in degradacije gozdov) ter da je potrebno obravnavati morebitne pomanjkljivosti, zlasti glede dolgoročnega financiranja ter trdnih in preglednih sistemov spremljanja stanja gozdov, pa tudi učinkovitega posvetovanja z udeleženimi stranmi ter domorodnimi in lokalnimi skupnostmi;
Highlights the need for further action at COP 17 to implement REDD+ (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) and to address any possible shortcomings in this regard especially with regard to long-term financing and robust and transparent forest monitor systems and, particularly on the effective consultation with parties, indigenous and local communities;
poudarja, da bi morala zasnova mehanizma REDD+ zagotoviti znatne koristi za biotsko raznovrstnost in bistvene ekosistemske storitve, ki presegajo ublažitev podnebnih sprememb, ter prispevati h krepitvi pravic in izboljšanju možnosti preživetja ljudi, ki so odvisni od gozdov, predvsem pa domorodnih in lokalnih skupnosti;
Stresses that the design of the REDD+ mechanism should ensure significant benefits for biodiversity and vital ecosystem services beyond climate change mitigation and should contribute to strengthening the rights and improving the livelihood of forest-dependent people, particularly of indigenous and local communities,
meni, da bi moral finančni mehanizem za REDD+ temeljiti na merilih uspešnosti, tudi glede gospodarjenja z gozdovi, ter upoštevati cilje strateškega načrta za biotsko raznovrstnost (2011), sprejete na desetem srečanju konference pogodbenic (COP 10) konvencije o biotski raznovrstnosti v Nagoji;
Takes the view that the funding mechanism for REDD should be based on performance criteria, including on forest governance, and take into consideration the objectives of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011 agreed under CBD COP 10 in Nagoya;
poudarja potrebo po pospešitvi javnega financiranja ukrepov REDD+, ki temeljijo na uspešnosti, z nagrajevanjem zmanjševanja krčenja gozdov glede na nacionalne osnove, da se bruto krčenje tropskih gozdov zaustavi najpozneje do leta 2020;
Underlines the need to speed up public financing for performance-based REDD+ action rewarding reductions in deforestation in accordance with national baselines with a view to halting gross tropical deforestation by 2020 at the latest;
obžaluje, da financiranje ukrepov REDD temelji na tako široki opredelitvi gozdov, da lahko vključuje tudi enovrstne plantaže tujerodnih vrst; meni, da lahko ta opredelitev povzroči neprimerno spodbudo za preusmeritev sredstev od prepotrebnega varstva starih in prastarih gozdov k novim komercialnim plantažam in od inoviranja;
Regrets that REDD funding is based on such a broad definition of forests that may include single species plantations of non-native species; considers that this definition may provide a perverse incentive to divert funding from the much needed protection of old and ancient forests to new commercial plantations and from innovation;
pozdravlja nedavni napredek Mednarodne pomorske organizacije pri uvedbi obveznih ukrepov za energetsko učinkovitost za mednarodno plovbo, ugotavlja pa, da je to zgolj prvi korak; poziva EU, naj si prizadeva za ambiciozne cilje za zmanjševanje emisij v ladijskem prometu, da bi spodbudila nadaljnji napredek v Mednarodni pomorski organizaciji pri sprejemanju vseh potrebnih ukrepov za svetovno zavezujoče zmanjšanje emisij iz pomorskega prometa v okviru UNFCCC;
Welcomes recent progress in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) on the introduction of mandatory energy efficiency measures for international shipping, but notes that this can only be seen as a first step; calls on the EU to push for ambitious targets for emissions reductions in shipping to encourage further progress in the IMO in taking the necessary steps towards globally binding reductions in emissions from maritime transport within the UNFCCC;
želi poudariti, da se bodo zaradi rasti ladijskega prometa emisije iz pomorskega prometa povečevale kljub tem ukrepom, saj se slednji uporabljajo samo za nove ladje; zato meni, da bi bilo treba v zvezi s tem poudariti nove alternativne pristope (to je določanje cen emisij ogljika, spodbujanje tehnološko usmerjenih ukrepov tudi za obstoječe ladje);
Wishes to highlight that, as a result of increases in ship traffic, emissions from maritime transport will increase despite these measures, since they apply to new ships only; is therefore of the opinion that alternative approaches (i.e. carbon pricing, further technology-centred measures also for existing ships) need to be stressed in this regard;
poziva EU, naj zagotovi, da se pri mednarodnem sporazumu upošteva celoten vpliv letalstva v obliki zavezujočih ciljev zmanjšanja za letalstvo, ter poziva vse akterje, naj zagotovijo, da bodo ti cilji podprti s strukturami za izvajanje; meni, da je razrešitev tega vprašanja vedno nujnejša, in podpira vključitev letalstva v evropski sistem trgovanja z emisijami;
Calls on the EU to ensure that the full impact of aviation is taken into account in an international agreement in the form of binding reduction targets for aviation, and urges all actors to make sure that these targets are backed up by enforcement structures; believes that resolution of this issue has become increasingly pressing and supports the inclusion of aviation in the European emissions trading system;
priznava načelo „skupne, a različne odgovornosti“ in priporoča uvedbo mednarodnih instrumentov s cilji globalnega zmanjševanja emisij za omejevanje vpliva mednarodnega letalstva in pomorskega prometa;
Recognises the principle of ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ and advocates the introduction of international instruments with global emission reduction targets to curb the climate impact of international aviation and maritime transport ;
meni, da ima delegacija EU bistveno vlogo v pogajanjih o spremembah podnebja in da je zato nesprejemljivo, da poslanci Evropskega parlamenta na prejšnjih konferencah pogodbenic niso mogli sodelovati na usklajevalnih sestankih EU; pričakuje, da bodo na usklajevalnih sestankih v Durbanu lahko sodelovali vsaj predsedniki delegacije Evropskega parlamenta;
Believes that the EU delegation plays a vital role in the climate change negotiations, and therefore finds it unacceptable that Members of the European Parliament have been unable to attend the EU coordination meetings at previous Conferences of the Parties; expects at least the chairs of the European Parliament delegation to be allowed to attend EU coordination meetings in Durban;
ugotavlja, da mora Komisija v skladu z okvirnim sporazumom, ki sta ga sklenila Komisija in Parlament novembra 2010, poenostaviti vključitev poslancev kot opazovalcev v delegacijah Unije, ki se pogajajo o večstranskih sporazumih; opozarja, da mora v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo (člen 218 PDEU) sporazume med Unijo in tretjimi državami ali mednarodnimi organizacijami odobriti Parlament;
Notes that, in accordance with the Framework Agreement concluded between the Commission and Parliament in November 2010, the Commission must facilitate the inclusion of Members of Parliament as observers in Union delegations negotiating multilateral agreements; recalls that, pursuant to the Lisbon Treaty (Article 218 TFEU), Parliament must give its consent to agreements between the Union and third countries or international organisations;
opozarja na obveznost podpisnic UNFCCC, da spodbujajo najširše sodelovanje v procesu UNFCCC, tudi sodelovanje nevladnih organizacij; poziva, naj na pogajanjih COP 17 sodeluje mednarodni forum staroselcev, saj nanje še posebej vplivajo podnebne spremembe in prilagajanje nanje;
Recalls the obligation of Parties to the UNFCCC to encourage the widest participation in the UNFCCC process, including that of non-governmental organisations; calls for the participation at the COP 17 negotiations of the International Forum of Indigenous Peoples, since such peoples are particularly affected by climate change and climate change adaptation;
ob upoštevanju vrhunskih srečanj skupine G-20 v Pittsburghu 24. in 25. septembra 2009, v Londonu 2. aprila 2009, v Torontu 26. in 27. junija 2010 ter v Seulu 11. in 12. novembra 2010,
having regard to the G20 summits held in Pittsburgh on 24 and 25 September 2009, in London on 2 April 2009, in Toronto on 26 and 27 June 2010 and in Seoul on 11 and 12 November 2010,
ob upoštevanju vrhunskih srečanj skupine G-8 v L'Aquili (Italija) od 8. do 10. julija 2009, v Deauvillu (Francija) 26. in 27. maja 2011 in v Muskoki (Kanada) 26. junija 2010,
having regard to the G8 summits held in L'Aquila, Italy, from 8 to 10 July 2009, in Deauville, France, on 26 and 27 May 2011 and in Muskoka, Canada, on 26 June 2010,
ob upoštevanju soglasja iz Monterreya in Deklaracije iz Dohe, ki sta bila sprejeta na mednarodnih konferencah o financiranju za razvoj v Monterreyu (Mehika) od 18. do 22. marca 2002 oziroma v Dohi (Katar) od 29. novembra do 2. decembra 2008,
having regard to the Monterrey Consensus and the Doha Declaration, adopted at the respective International Conferences on Financing for Development held in Monterrey, Mexico, from 18 to 22 March 2002 and in Doha, Qatar, from 29 November to 2 December 2008,
ob upoštevanju Pariške deklaracije o učinkovitosti pomoči in agende za ukrepanje iz Akre,
having regard to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Accra Agenda for Action,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. julija 2011 o povečevanju učinka razvojne politike EU Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0320 .
having regard to its resolution of 5 July 2011 on increasing the impact of EU development policy P7_TA(2011)0320 .
ker so države članice lani dale le 0,43 % svojega BND za uradno razvojno pomoč, čeprav so se glede razvojnih ciljev tisočletja obvezale, da bodo do leta 2015 dale 0,7 % BND z vmesnim ciljem 0,56 % leta 2010;
whereas last year the Member States gave only 0.43% of their GNI in official development assistance (ODA), despite the Millennium commitment to give 0.7% by 2015 and an interim 2010 target of 0.56%;
ker je 15 držav članic za leto 2009 ali 2010 znižalo svoj proračun za pomoč;
whereas 15 Member States cut their aid budgets in 2009 or 2010;
ker so se države članice leta 2005 obvezale, da bodo namenile 50 % vse nove pomoči podsaharski Afriki, vendar so dejansko zagotovile le polovico te vsote, in ker niso uresničile niti svoje zaveze glede 0,15 % BND za najmanj razvite države do leta 2010;
whereas the Member States promised in 2005 to channel 50% of all new aid to sub-Saharan Africa, but whereas they have actually given only half this amount, and whereas the Member States have also failed to honour their pledge to give 0.15% of their GNI to least-developed countries (LDCs) by 2010;
ker se tovrstne obveze nanašajo na odstotni delež BND, kar v času recesije pomeni dejansko zmanjšanje, je gospodarska kriza slab izgovor za sorazmerno zmanjševanje proračuna za pomoč;
whereas, since such commitments refer to percentages of GNI and therefore correspond to a reduction in real terms in times of recession, the economic crisis is a poor excuse for cutting aid budgets proportionally;
ker neizpolnjevanje obvez glede pomoči močno slabi zaupanje v EU in škodi njeni verodostojnosti pri partnerjih v državah v razvoju, medtem ko bi bilo spoštovanje teh obvez močno in jasno sporočilo revnim narodom in drugim donatorjem;
whereas failing to keep its aid promises will seriously undermine confidence in the EU and damage its credibility as far as its partners in the developing world are concerned, while, on the other hand, honouring those commitments would send a powerful, unequivocal signal to poor nations and other donors;
ker slabo davčno upravljanje v gospodarstvu držav v razvoju onemogoča pravično porazdelitev bogastva, vladam jemlje sredstva in ovira izkoreninjenje revščine;
whereas poor tax governance in developing economies prevents equitable wealth redistribution, starves governments of funds and hampers poverty eradication;
ker nezakoniti tokovi kapitala iz držav v razvoju po ocenah znašajo desetkrat toliko kot svetovna razvojna pomoč;
whereas illicit capital flows from developing countries are estimated to amount to roughly 10 times the level of global development assistance;
ker inovativni mehanizmi financiranja sedaj predstavljajo samo 3 % razvojne pomoči EU;
whereas innovative financing mechanisms currently account for just 3% of EU development aid;
ker lahko programi v korist revnim za izboljšanje dostopa do finančnih storitev, na primer programov mikrofinanciranja, izredno pomagajo malim kmetom, zlasti ženskam, pri doseganju samooskrbe s hrano in prehranske varnosti;
whereas pro-poor schemes to improve access to financial services, such as microfinance schemes, can afford extraordinary help to smallholder farmers, particularly women, in achieving food self-sufficiency and food security;
ker nakazila priseljencev v države v razvoju presegajo svetovne proračune za pomoč in ker kljub obvezi EU leta 2008, da bo zmanjšala stroške za tovrstna nakazila, na tem področju skoraj ni bilo sprememb;
whereas migrants' remittances to developing countries exceed global aid budgets, and whereas, although the EU made a commitment in 2008 to lower the cost of remittances, only minimal changes have been made;
ker je pomoč EU za trgovino leta 2009 znašala 10,5 milijarde EUR, medtem ko je pomoč, povezana s trgovino znašala 3 milijarde EUR, kar je veliko več od zastavljenih ciljev;
whereas EU aid-for-trade amounted to EUR 10.5 billion in 2009, while trade-related assistance amounted to EUR 3 billion, a figure which is well above target;
ker je v členu 208 PDEU določeno, da'Unija upošteva cilje razvojnega sodelovanja pri politikah, ki jih izvaja in ki lahko vplivajo na države v razvoju„;
whereas Article 208 TFEU states that: ‘The Union shall take account of the objectives of development cooperation in the policies that it implements which are likely to affect developing countries’;
ker je kriza zlasti prizadela države v razvoju, še posebej najmanj razvite države, kar je povzročilo ponovno naraščanje dolgov;
whereas developing countries, and the LDCs in particular, have been hit especially hard by the crisis, leading notably to a new rise in debt levels;
ker je EU leta 2009 zagotovila 2,3 milijarde EUR za financiranje hitrega začetka izvajanja podnebnih ukrepov za države v razvoju;
whereas the EU provided EUR 2.3 billion in fast-start climate funding for developing countries in 2009;
ker se je EU zavezala, da bodo sredstva za financiranje podnebnih ukrepov „nova in dodatna“;
whereas the EU has pledged to ensure that climate funding is ‘new and additional’;
ker se za neučinkovito pomoč vsako leto porabi 6 milijard EUR javnega denarja;
whereas ineffective aid wastes up to EUR 6 billion of public money every year;
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije o poročilu EU o odgovornosti na področju financiranja za razvoj za leto 2011, saj je izredno uporabno za preglednost in medsebojni pregled;
Welcomes the Commission's communication on the EU Accountability Report 2011 on Financing for Development as an extremely useful exercise in transparency and peer review;
Razvojna pomoč
Development aid
priznava večanje pritiska na nacionalne proračune zaradi finančne in gospodarske krize; vendar meni, da bo treba za doseganje cilja izkoreninjenja revščine predvsem spremeniti politiko v industrializiranih državah in državah v razvoju, da se odpravijo strukturni vzroki revščine;
Acknowledges the growing pressure on national budgets as a result of the financial and economic crisis; believes, however, that achieving the poverty eradication goal will require, above all, policy change in industrialised and developing countries to address the structural causes of poverty;
ponovno poudarja svojo globoko skrb glede dejstva, da tuji vlagatelji z vladno podporo odkupujejo kmetijska zemljišča, zlasti v Afriki, kar bo ogrozilo lokalno prehransko varnost; poziva Komisijo, naj problematiko prilaščanja zemlje vključi v dialog o politikah z državami v razvoju, da bi skladnost politike postala temelj razvojnega sodelovanja na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni ter da se preprečita razlastitev malih kmetov in netrajnostna raba zemljišč in vode;
Reiterates its deep concern about the current acquisition of farmland by government-backed foreign investors, particularly in Africa, which is liable to undermine local food security; urges the Commission to include the issue of land grabbing in its policy dialogue with developing countries so as to make policy coherence the cornerstone of development cooperation at both national and international level and prevent the expropriation of small farmers and unsustainable land and water use;
izraža pohvalo EU in državam članicam, da so kljub krizi še vedno največji svetovni donator uradne razvojne pomoči;
Commends the EU and its Member States for remaining the world's largest donor of ODA, despite the crisis;
pozdravlja nedavno obnovljeno obvezo držav članic, da bodo izpolnile svoje obveze glede uradne razvojne pomoči, zlasti cilj 0,7 % BND; se strinja s Svetom, da samo uradna razvojna pomoč ne bo dovolj za izkoreninjenje svetovne revščine; meni, da bi si morala razvojna politika EU prizadevati za odpravo strukturnih ovir za cilj izkoreninjenja revščine, in sicer z izvajanjem skladnosti politike za razvoj v politikah EU na področju kmetijstva, trgovine, naložb, davčnih oazah, dostopa do surovih in podnebnih sprememb;
Welcomes the Member States' recent renewed commitment to meeting their ODA commitments, especially the target of giving 0.7% of their GNI; agrees with the Council that ODA alone will not be enough to eradicate global poverty; is of the view that EU development policy should aim to eliminate structural obstacles to the poverty eradication goal by implementing policy coherence for development between EU policies on agriculture, trade, investment, tax havens, access to raw materials and climate change;
vendar izraža globoko skrb glede dejstva, da je EU v letu 2010 izplačala približno 15 milijard EUR uradne razvojne pomoči manj, kot je načrtovala, da bo morala za doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja do leta 2015 podvojiti sredstva pomoči, da ji ni uspelo bistveno povečati pomoči za Afriko in najmanj razvite države, čeprav se je obvezala, da bo to storila, in da je več držav članic v letih 2009 in 2010 znižalo svoje proračune za pomoč, dodatna znižanja pa se načrtujejo v letu 2011 in kasneje;
Expresses, nonetheless, its deep concern about the fact that in 2010 the EU fell some EUR 15 billion short of its own ODA goal for that year, that it will need practically to double its aid in order to meet its 2015 Millennium target, that it has failed to increase substantially its aid to Africa and the LDCs, in spite of its pledges to do so, and that a number of Member States have shrunk their aid budgets in 2009 and 2010, with further cuts scheduled for 2011 and beyond;