natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so stroški raziskav in razvoja v Evropi v primerjavi z drugimi svetovnimi nizki, med drugim zaradi pomanjkanja zasebnih naložb in ker okvirni pogoji niso prijazni inovacijam; ker privlačnost sedmega okvirnega programa za industrijski sektor in uporaba raziskav v korist gospodarstva nista v celoti dokazani; ker pa se poleg potrebe po finančnih sredstvih jasno kaže tudi potreba po boljšem usklajevanju in sofinanciranju med Unijo, državami članicami in regijami, ob polnem upoštevanju posebnosti in etičnih možnosti držav članic,
whereas R&D expenditures in Europe is low compared with other global powers, among others due to a lack of private investment and innovation friendly framework conditions; whereas the attractiveness of FP7 for the industrial sector and the use of research for the benefit of the economy are thus not fully demonstrated; whereas beyond the sums involved, there is also a clear need for better coordination and co-financing between the Union, the Member States, and the regions, with full respect for the specificities and the ethical options made by the Member States,
ker le pri zelo majhnem deležu javnih naložb v raziskave, razvoj in inovacije poteka evropsko sodelovanje,
whereas only a relatively low level of public investment in RDI is the subject of European cooperation,
ker so nujno potrebni boljši odnosi med akademskim okoljem, raziskovalno skupnostjo in industrijo, da se omogoči pretvorba rezultatov raziskav v proizvode in storitve, ki bodo zagotavljali gospodarsko rast in koristili vsej družbi,
whereas a better relationship between the academic, research and industrial worlds is essential for research results to be better converted into products and services generating economic growth and benefits for the society as a whole,
ker bi moral sedmi raziskovalni program temeljiti na enakih splošnih načelih kot evropski raziskovalni prostor,
whereas FP7 should be modelled on the same general principles as European Research Area (ERA),
ker je bilo od 54,6 milijarde EUR, namenjene temu programu, 25,8 milijarde oziroma povprečno 6,5 milijarde na leto porabljene v prvih štirih letih (2007–2010) in ker je za zadnja tri leta (2011–2013) ostalo 28,8 milijarde oziroma povprečno 9,6 milijarde na leto,
whereas, of the EUR 54.6 billion in the programme, 25.8 billion have been committed over the first four years (2007 to 2010), i.e. 6.5 billion a year on average, and 28.8 billion remain to be committed over the last three years (2011 to 2013), i.e. 9.6 billion a year on average,
ker je obdobje 2011–2013 občutljivo obdobje, ki zahteva takojšnjo posebno pozornost glede dejavnikov konkurenčnosti in socialne kohezije, katerih ključni element so prav raziskave in inovacije,
whereas the years 2011 to 2013 are fragile years, requiring immediate particular attention with regard to competitiveness and social cohesion factors, of which research and innovation are essential components,
ker so glavne ovire sedmega okvirnega programa še vedno zapletenost upravnega vodenja, preobsežna birokracija, premajhna preglednost, neučinkovitost in neupravičene zamude, kar so močno odvrača raziskovalce, industrijo ter mala in srednja podjetja, od sodelovanja v tem programu, tako da bi morala biti ena od prednostnih nalog velik premik pri poenostavljanju,
whereas complexity of administrative management, considerable red tape, bureaucracy, lack of transparency, inefficiency and unjustified delays remain major handicaps for FP7 and provide important disincentives for researchers, industry and SMEs from participating in the programme and therefore achieving a quantum leap in simplification should be one of the highest priorities,
ker je cilj 40-odstotne udeležbe raziskovalk v sedmem okvirnem programu ambiciozen in pravi cilj; ker je trenutni delež raziskovalk v raziskovalnih projektih sedmega okvirnega programa borih 25,5 %,
whereas the target of participation of 40 % women researchers in FP7 is ambitious and the right target; whereas the current female participation of researchers in FP7 research projects is a disappointingly 25.5 %,
pozdravlja kakovost poročil strokovnih skupin o vmesni oceni sedmega okvirnega programa in sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja, ki vsebuje oceno o kakovosti dejavnosti, izvajanju in doseženih rezultatih, in to kljub le splošnim pooblastilom, ki so jih imele strokovne skupine; vseeno poudarja, da ocena ni pokrila vseh dejavnosti držav članic in Unije;
Welcomes the quality of the expert reports on the interim evaluation of FP7 and of the risk-sharing finance facility, covering the quality of activities, implementation and the results obtained, despite the general nature of the remit given to the expert groups; points out, however, that the evaluation did not cover the overall picture made up of the actions of the Member States and those of the Union;
ne razume zamude Komisije, ki je sporočilo objavila šele 9. februarja 2011, čeprav bi ga morala objaviti najpozneje leta 2010, in izraža razočaranje zaradi pomanjkljivosti tega sporočila z vidika sedanjih izzivov, zlasti sedanje gospodarske krize, sredstev, ki jih je še treba porabiti v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa, itd.;
Fails to understand the delay on the part of the Commission, which published its communication on 9 February 2011 although it had an obligation to do so no later than 2010, and regrets the weakness of the Commission communication in view of current challenges, particularly the current economic crisis situation, the sums remaining to be committed under the FP7 etc.;
poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za nadaljnje ukrepanje zlasti v zvezi z desetimi posebnimi priporočili strokovne skupine;
Asks the Commission to follow up in particular the ten specific recommendations made by the expert group;
poudarja, da so sklepi vmesne ocene relativni, saj večina sredstev sedmega okvirnega programa še ni bila dodeljena, ker se začeti projekti še vedno izvajajo, drugi projekti, financirani v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa, pa se bodo izvajali še po njegovem izteku;
Underlines the relative nature of the conclusions drawn by the interim evaluation, seeing that the majority of FP7 funds have not yet been allocated, projects that have been initiated are still under way and others funded under the FP7 will run beyond its term;
Rezultati sedmega okvirnega programa
Results of FP7
meni, da rezultati, ki jih je dosegel sedmi okvirni program, izkazujejo evropsko dodano vrednost na področju raziskav in razvoja, čeprav Evropa še vedno zaostaja za ZDA in izgublja prednost, ki jo je imela pred gospodarstvi v vzponu; vseeno pa poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši svoja prizadevanja pri posredovanju uspešnih rezultatov državam članicam, znanstveni srenji in evropskim državljanom;
Takes the view that, despite the fact that Europe continues to lag behind the US and is losing the lead it had over the emerging economies, the results achieved by FP7 tend to demonstrate a European added-value with regard to R&D in Europe; however, calls on Commission to step up its efforts in communicating the successful results to Member States, the scientific community and European citizens;
obžaluje, da ni metode za ocenjevanje, koliko so projekti, financirani iz sedmega okvirnega programa, pripomogli k napredku znanstvenega znanja;
Deplores the lack of a method for evaluating how far projects funded by FP7 have advanced scientific knowledge;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj povečajo svoja komunikacijska prizadevanja v zvezi s 7OP (tudi z uporabo novih tehnologij, na primer pametnih raziskovalnih informacijskih storitev), z lažjim dostopom do informacij o udeležbi, z objavo prihodnjih raziskovalnih izzivov in razširjanjem rezultatov raziskav; podpira pobude Komisije, ki spodbujajo odprt dostop do rezultatov javno financiranih raziskav, kjer je to ustrezno in izvedljivo glede na pravice intelektualne lastnine;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to boost up their communication efforts regarding FP7 (including through the use of new technologies, such as smart research information services), facilitating access to information on participation, announcing forthcoming research challenges, and disseminating of research findings; supports the Commission's initiatives to promote open access to the results of publicly funded research, where relevant and feasible in relation to intellectual property rights;
pozdravlja stopnjo udeležbe in odličnosti pri izbiri projektov; vendar obžaluje, da uspešnost tega programa na splošno ostaja precej majhna in da utegne biti celo odvračalen, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja, ki imajo pomembno vlogo pri pretvorbi rezultatov raziskav v proizvode in storitve; meni, da bi to lahko izboljšali s poenostavitvijo upravnih in finančnih pravil, pa tudi projektov in postopkov, tako da bi bolje ustrezali potrebam malih in srednjih podjetij;
Welcomes the level of participation and excellence in project selection; regrets, however, that the success rate under this programme generally remains quite low and is a disincentive to apply, particularly for SMEs, which play an important role in turning research results in products and services; believes that simplification of administrative and financial rules, as well as projects and procedures that better fit SMEs' needs could improve this situation;
ugotavlja, da se je zaradi množenja obravnavanih ciljev in tem ter razvejanosti instrumentov povečala obseg sedmega okvirnega programa, zmanjšala pa njegovo zmožnost, da koristi natančno določenemu evropskemu cilju;
Notes that an ever-growing number of objectives and themes covered and diversification of instruments has widened the scope of FP7 and reduced its capacity to serve a specific European objective;
odobrava okrepitev posebnega programa za sodelovanje, ki zaradi aktualnih znanstvenih in tehnoloških izzivov ostaja pomemben; poudarja njegovo vlogo pri razvoju kritične mase na področju raziskav, razvoja in inovacij, ki je na nacionalni oziroma regionalni ravni ni mogoče doseči na tak način, saj tako dokazuje evropsko dodano vrednost; meni, da morajo skupne čeznacionalne raziskave ostati prednostna naloga; priporoča izvajanje sheme „prihodnjih in nastajajočih tehnologij“ ter razširitev načrtov na vsa tematska področja; zahteva večjo prožnost pri določanju glavnih tem, pragov in zgornjih meja za financiranje, pri čemer bi razlikovali med velikimi in malimi projekti; poudarja, da je sedanji program sodelovanja preozek, teme pa so pogosto preveč podrobne, da bi lahko odgovorile na velike družbene izzive; priporoča, naj se v naslednjem okvirnem programu predvidijo razpisi s širšim tematskim okvirom;
Approves the strengthening of the ‘Cooperation’ specific programme, which remains relevant given current scientific and technological challenges; stresses its role in developing RDI critical mass of a kind not achievable at national/regional level, thus demonstrating European added-value; believes that collaborative transnational research should remain a priority; recommends implementation of the ‘Future and Emerging Technologies’ scheme and extension of the use of ‘roadmaps’ to all thematic areas; asks for more flexibility in setting call themes and financial thresholds and ceilings, making a distinction between large and small projects; underlines that the current Cooperation programme is too narrow and the topics often too specific to address grand societal challenges; recommends that the next framework programme provides for calls with a broader thematic scope;
poudarja, da bo širši interdisciplinarni pristop potreben tudi za učinkovito spoprijemanje z vse večjimi družbenimi izzivi; poudarja, da imajo družbene in humanistične vede pomembno vlogo pri reševanju velikih izzivov, s katerimi se sooča EU; obžaluje, da je zaradi zelo posebnih in ozkih razpisov v poglavju Sodelovanje o družbeno-ekonomskih znanostih in humanističnih vedah zelo težko začeti nove in inovativne raziskave na tem področju;
Stresses that wider interdisciplinary perspectives will also be needed to tackle the growing societal challenges effectively; underlines that social sciences and humanities play a vital role in answering the grand challenges that the EU is facing; regrets that the very specific and narrow calls in the Cooperation chapter on socio-economic sciences and humanities makes it very difficult to make new and innovation research in this area;
predlaga, naj se za uresničevanje ciljev strategije EU 2020 raziskave, ki se podpirajo iz 7OP, usmerijo v reševanje najbolj žgočih izzivov EU v sektorjih, ki so opredeljeni v poglavju Sodelovanje: zdravje (vključno s kliničnimi raziskavami in medicinskimi tehnologijami), hrana in biotehnologija (tudi varnost hrane), informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije, energija (vključno z energetsko učinkovitostjo, pametnimi omrežji, obnovljivimi viri, zajemanjem in shranjevanjem ogljika, evropskim strateškim načrtom za energetsko tehnologijo (SET) in uporabo bioplina), okolje (vključno s podnebnimi spremembami, vodo, tlemi, lesom in gozdovi), trajnostni promet, družbeno-ekonomske in humanistične znanosti, vesolje in varnost;
Proposes that, in order to meet the EU 2020 strategy objectives, research supported by FP7 be focussed towards addressing EU's most pressing challenges within the sectors identified in the ‘Cooperation’ chapter of FP7: health (including clinical and preventive research and medical technologies), food and biotechnology (including food safety), ICT, nanosciences and nanotechnologies, energy (including energy efficiency, smart grids, renewable energy, CCS, the SET-PLAN and the use of biogas), environment (including climate change, water, soil, woods and forests), sustainable transport, socio-economic sciences and humanities, space and security;
predlaga okrepitev skupnih raziskav, na primer dejavnosti, ki se financirajo v posebnem programu Sodelovanje; poziva k možnosti oblikovanja manjših in srednje velikih projektov in partnerskih konzorcijev, ki bi omogočali učinkovito usklajevanje in hkrati okrepili znanstveno odličnost; poudarja, da mora pristop na podlagi skupnih raziskav ostati osrednji element okvirnega programa;
Proposes the reinforcement of collaborative research such as the activities funded in the specific programme ‘Cooperation’; calls for the possibility of forming smaller and medium sized projects and partner consortia that allow efficient coordination, in addition to strengthening scientific excellence; stresses that the collaborative research approach must remain the core element of the Framework Programme;
pozdravlja obetavne rezultate, ki jih je v poglavju Zamisli dosegel Evropski raziskovalni svet (ERC), in njegovo vlogo pri povečevanju razpoznavnosti in privlačnosti evropskih raziskav; obžaluje pomanjkljivo sodelovanje in udeležbo zasebnega sektorja v Evropskem raziskovalnem svetu; poziva Komisijo, naj poveča financiranje Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta (kar bi povečalo tudi njegovo uspešnost) ter naj oceni možnosti za nadaljnje izboljševanje njegovih struktur in mehanizmov, tudi tako, da bi postal neodvisen pravni subjekt, ki bo imel pristojnost za odločanje in bo neposredno odgovoren za svojo znanstveno strategijo in upravno vodenje, kar bi lahko uporabili tudi kot vodilo za večjo neodvisnost drugih agencij za financiranje raziskava, razvoja in inovacij; podpira večjo preglednost v postopku imenovanja znanstvenega sveta in pri sestavi odborov za pregled; priporoča, naj Evropski raziskovalni svet ohrani močno podporo posameznim odličnim znanstvenikom; poziva Evropski raziskovalni svet, naj ponudi tudi možnost podpore za skupinske projekte, vendar vedno pod pogojem, da se oblikujejo s postopki od spodaj navzgor;
Welcomes, in the ‘Ideas’ chapter, promising results obtained by the European Research Council (ERC) and its role aimed at enhancing the visibility and attractiveness of European research; regrets the lack of private sector participation and involvement in the ERC; calls on the Commission to increase funding for the ERC (which will also increase the success rate), as well as to assess the options for further improving its structures and mechanisms, including making the ERC an independent legal entity with decision-making power, directly responsible for its own scientific strategy and administrative management, which could also be used as a pilot for greater independence of other funding agencies for R&D and innovation; supports greater transparency in the process of the appointment of the Scientific Council and in the composition of the review panels; recommends that the ERC retains a strong support for individual excellent scientists; however, calls on the ERC to also provide a possibility for support of team-based projects, always provided that such projects are formed through bottom-up processes;
podpira dejavnosti Marie Curie v poglavju Ljudje, ki so dragocene za poklicno pot raziskovalcev, zagotavljajo individualizirano raziskovanje od spodaj navzgor znotraj zelo raznovrstnih tem, odvračajo beg možganov ter pripomorejo k večji privlačnosti raziskovalnih poklicev za obetajoče mlade raziskovalce iz Evrope in tretjih držav; glede na sorazmerno prevelik vpis priporoča, naj se program Marie Curie za mobilnost nadaljuje z razširjenimi viri okviru sedmega okvirnega programa, da bi okrepili možnosti za mobilnost raziskovalcev in doktorskih študentov (tako med akademsko sfero kot v zasebnem sektorju ali med državami članicami, na primer z uvedbo sheme raziskovalnih kuponov, kjer bi denar za raziskave sledil raziskovalcem; meni pa, da je mogoče v okviru dejavnosti Marie Curie številne ukrepe še poenostaviti; obžaluje, da se večina znanstvenega dela, opravljenega v EU, še vedno odvija v negotovih delovnih razmerah;
Supports, within the framework of the ‘People’ chapter, the Marie Curie Actions, which are of great value to researchers in their career, secure individualised bottom-up research within a very broad range of topics, put an end to the ‘brain drain’, make research careers more attractive to very promising young researchers both from Europe and third countries; with a view to the relatively high oversubscription, recommends that the Marie Curie programme for mobility is continued with extended resources within FP7 to further enhance the possibilities for mobility of researchers and PhD students (including between academia and private sector or between Member States, for example by introducing a research voucher scheme with money for research following the researchers); however believes that within the Marie Currie Actions there is also room for simplification within the number of actions; regrets that most of the scientific work carried out within EU is still done under precarious working conditions;
meni, da je treba za povečanje kadrovskih virov, ki se v Evropi ukvarjajo z raziskavami, poskrbeti, da bodo poklicne možnosti na tem področju privlačnejše, tako da se odpravijo upravne ovire ter priznajo zasluge ter čas usposabljanja in dela v katerem koli raziskovalnem centru; v ta namen spodbuja Komisijo in države članice, naj vzpostavijo skupen sistem za vrednotenje odličnosti in poklicne poti raziskovalcev ter uspešnosti posameznih univerz; ponovno poudarja, da je pomembno vlagati v izobraževanje, usposabljanje in razvoj znanj ter dopolniti povezave med izobraževanjem, raziskavami in inovacijami;
Considers that in order to increase the human resources dedicated to research in Europe, it is necessary to make professional careers in this field more attractive by eliminating administrative barriers and recognising merit and training time and work at any research centre; to this end, encourages the Commission and Member States to establish a common system to evaluate the researchers' excellence and career, as well as to assess universities' performance; reaffirms the importance of investing in education, training and skills development and complementing the linkages between education, research and innovation;
izraža dvom o raznovrstnosti ciljev v poglavju „Zmogljivosti“ in težav, ki izhajajo iz tega, zlasti na področju mednarodnega sodelovanja in glede napredka v zvezi z veliko raziskovalno infrastrukturo (ESFRI); meni, da so močno potrebni ukrepi v prid malih in srednjih podjetij, zlasti inovativnih, in poziva Komisijo, naj ohrani te dejavnosti in z njimi povezani proračun, hkrati pa ukrepa za izboljšanje njihovega izvajanja; meni, da projekti „Infrastruktura“, ERA-NET, ERA-NET+ in pobude, ki temeljijo na členu 185, izpolnjujejo svojo nalogo, namreč strukturirati evropski raziskovalni prostor;
Voices concerns regarding the heterogeneous nature of the objectives of the ‘Capacities’ chapter and the difficulties that result, notably with regard to international cooperation and the progress on the major Research Infrastructures (ESFRI); considers that there is a clear need for actions in favour of SMEs and innovative SMEs and calls on the Commission to at least maintain these actions and the budget associated with them, while taking steps to improve their implementation; considers that the ERA-NET and ERA-NET+ ‘Infrastructure’ projects and the initiatives based on Article 185 fulfil their role aimed at structuring the European Research Area (ERA);
priznava, da so skupne tehnološke pobude koristne za konkurenčnost evropske industrije; obžaluje, da prihaja do pravnih in upravnih ovir (pravna osebnost, finančni predpisi in v nekaterih primerih tudi intelektualna lastnina), ki lahko od sodelovanja odvrnejo številne pomembne akterje na področju raziskav ter mala in srednja podjetja; obžaluje razlike med vodstvenimi in pravnimi strukturami in visoke operativne stroške, povezane z zagonom skupnih tehnoloških pobud; poziva države članice, naj potem, ko podpišejo dogovor o sofinanciranju skupnih tehnoloških pobud, tudi izpolnijo svoje obveznosti; poziva Komisijo, naj poenostavi pravila in stopnje financiranja za podobne kategorije udeležencev v vseh skupnih tehnoloških pobudah na podlagi modela sedmega okvirnega programa, vključno z nacionalnim sofinanciranjem; prosi, da bi bil bolj vključen v politični nadzor nad temi instrumenti, zlasti za zagotovitev ustreznega ravnotežja glede sodelovanja in dejavnosti; poudarja, da te pobude ne bi smele povzročiti zunanjega izvajanja v okviru javnega financiranja in bi morale glede državne pomoči in predkonkurenčnosti ostati v pravnih okvirih;
Acknowledges that ‘Joint Technological Initiatives’ (JTIs) assist the competitiveness of European industry; regrets the legal and administrative obstacles (legal personality, financial rules and in some cases also intellectual property), which may discourage a large number of key research actors and SMEs from participating; also regrets the heterogeneous governance and legal structures and the high operating costs specific to start-up of JTIs; calls on Member States to fulfil their obligations once they have agreed to co-fund JTIs; calls on the Commission to simplify rules and funding rates for similar categories of participants in all JTIs following the FP7 model, including national co-funding; asks to be more closely involved in the political oversight of these instruments in particular for ensuring an adequate balance of participation and of activities; underlies that these initiatives should not lead to the outsourcing of public funding and should remain within the legal boundaries concerning state aid and pre-competition;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu pošlje jasne in podrobne informacije o delovanju skupnih tehnoloških pobud ter pri tem za vsak primer posebej navede njihov pravni status, kdo sestavlja upravni odbor, in začete dejavnosti;
Asks the Commission to give Parliament clear and detailed information on the functioning of JTIs, stating in each case their legal status, the people who make up the governing board, and activities undertaken;