natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je sedanja gospodarska kriza razkrila, da so razvite države ter države BRICS in druge države v vzponu medsebojno odvisne; opozarja na tesno vzajemno povezavo med gospodarsko rastjo v razvitih gospodarstvih in gospodarstvih v vzponu; poudarja pozitivno naravo takšne soodvisnosti ter vzajemno koristnost političnih in gospodarskih vezi med razvitimi gospodarstvi in gospodarstvi v vzponu; meni, da bi si morale EU in njene države članice zato v duhu partnerstva in s ciljem doseganja novega, vključujočega sistema vodenja prizadevati za nadaljnji politični dialog in razumevanje z državami BRICS in drugimi državami v vzponu; prav tako verjame, da bi bila redna srečanja na visoki ravni med EU in posameznimi državami BRICS dobra priložnost za gradnjo odnosov zaupanja, zbliževanje stališč in spodbujanje držav BRICS, naj prevzamejo večjo odgovornost v novem sistemu svetovnega reda na podlagi skupnih nalog in pristopov ter bolje usklajenih ukrepov; meni, da bi lahko instrument strateškega partnerstva prispeval dagocene sinergije pri doseganju teh ciljev;
Stresses how the current economic crisis has demonstrated the interdependence between the emerged powers and the BRICS and other emerging countries; points to the deep, mutual link between stable economic growth of developed economies and stable economic growth of emerging economies; emphasises the positive nature of such interdependence and the mutually beneficial character of political and economic ties between developed and emerging economies; believes that further political dialogue and understanding with the BRICS and other emerging countries, including on an individual basis, should thus be pursued by the EU and its Member States in a spirit of partnership and with the overall aim of achieving an inclusive new system of governance; believes, furthermore, that regular high-level meetings between the EU and individual BRICS countries would provide a valuable opportunity to build relations of trust, reconcile positions and encourage BRICS countries to assume greater responsibility in a new system of global governance, based on shared responsibility, common approaches and more closely coordinated actions; expresses the view that the instrument of strategic partnerships could provide valuable synergies in achieving such objectives;
meni, da imajo odnosi med EU in drugimi glavnimi silami na eni strani ter državami BRICS in drugimi državami v vzponu na drugi strani sicer še vedno pomembno gospodarsko razsežnost, vendar so v bistvu politični in bi morali imeti tudi politični okvir, saj imajo vse države skupen interes, da zagotovijo učinkovit sistem upravljanja na svetovni ravni ter se skupaj, v duhu sodelovanja in posvetovanja ter zbliževanja političnih stališč, soočijo s tveganji, ki ogrožajo svetovno stabilnost in varnost ter lahko zmanjšajo možnosti za svetovno rast; zato poziva k tesnejšemu sodelovanju med EU in državami BRICS, tudi v smislu partnerstva s posameznimi državami BRICS, pri vprašanjih mednarodnega pomena;
Believes that relations between, on the one hand, the established powers and, on the other, the BRICS and other emerging powers maintain a relevant economic dimension, but are essentially political and should thus be politically framed, as all the countries concerned share an interest in ensuring an effective system of global governance and in tackling together, in a spirit of cooperation and consultation, and convergence of policy stances, those global stability and security risks which may pose a threat to sustainable global economic growth and its potential for the future; calls, therefore, for enhanced cooperation between the EU and the BRICS, including in terms of partnerships with individual BRICS countries, on all matters of international concern;
poudarja, da imajo države BRICS morda res podobna zunanjepolitična stališča, vendar med njimi obstajajo ogromne razlike v političnem, gospodarskem in socialnem smislu; zlasti poudarja, da se njihovi politični sistemi razlikujejo, in sicer segajo od strogih avtoritarnih režimov do verodostojnih in stabilnih demokracij; v zvezi s tem poziva EU, naj okrepi odnose in razvije sinergije zlasti s tistimi državami BRICS, ki resnično delijo in spoštujejo demokratične vrednote ter si prizadevajo za socialno tržno gospodarstvo;
Stresses that whilst the BRICS may hold similar stances in foreign policy terms, major differences characterise them in political, economic and social terms; points out, in particular, that their political systems vary from strong authoritarian regimes to credible and stable democracies; calls, in this respect, on the EU to step up relations and develop synergies, in particular, with those BRICS that genuinely share and respect democratic values and strive for a social market economy;
pozdravlja koncept dvostranskih strateških partnerstev ter poziva Svet in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj poskrbita za njegovo operativnost; meni, da so strateška partnerstva obetavno in po potrebi prilagodljivo orodje za vzpostavitev in razvoj odnosov EU s ključnimi akterji na svetovnem prizorišču, vključno z državami BRICS in drugimi silami v vzponu; priporoča, da EU ta instrument uporablja na področju večstranskih in dvostranskih odnosov ter za razvoj povezav med obojimi; poudarja, da je notranja usklajenost bistvena, da bi EU lahko delovala kot resnična strateška sogovornica držav BRICS in drugih sil v vzponu in da bi jo te v tej vlogi tudi sprejemale;
Welcomes the concept of bilateral strategic partnerships and urges the Council and the EEAS to operationalise it; considers strategic partnerships to be a promising and potentially transformative tool for organising and advancing the EU's relations with key players in the global arena, including the BRICS and other emerging powers; recommends that this instrument be used by the EU to pursue both multilateral and bilateral agendas and to develop meaningful linkages between the two; underlines that internal coherence is vital for the EU to act and be perceived as a genuine strategic interlocutor with the BRICS and other emerging powers;
ugotavlja, da se zdi, da so države BRICS v preteklosti v nekaterih primerih usklajevale svoja zunanjepolitična stališča v Varnostnem svetu ZN, predvsem ob izbruhu krize v Libiji in Siriji, pa tudi ko so zavlačevale z glasovanjem o vlogi EU v Generalni skupščini ZN ter zavzele podobna stališča glede Slonokoščene obale in Sudana; poudarja, da se zato morda zdi, da države BRICS izpodbijajo obstoječi sistem upravljanja na mednarodni ravni, vendar lahko demokratični dialog, med drugim tudi na individualni ravni, in partnerstvo v ospredje postavita sinergije in pospešita nov, vključujoč sistem upravljanja na svetovni ravni; meni, da bi morala EU ustrezno upoštevati novo politično in gospodarsko vlogo držav BRICS in drugih držav v vzponu, saj lahko s tem prispeva k mirni reformi svetovnega reda, ne da bi ga destabilizirali;
Notes that in the past the BRICS have appeared to coordinate their stances in foreign policy terms in the UN Security Council in certain instances, most notably at the onset of the Libyan and Syrian crises and, additionally, by deferring the vote on the role of the EU in the UNGA and by adopting coinciding positions on Côte d'Ivoire and Sudan; points out in this regard that the BRICS may seem to be challenging the current system of international governance, but that democratic dialogue, political engagement, including on an individual basis, and true partnership may bring to the fore positive synergies and facilitate a new inclusive system of global governance; believes that the EU should duly take into account the new weight, in political and economic terms, of the BRICS and other emerging powers, as this may contribute to an orderly reform of global governance, based on a convergent platform without any destabilising effects;
ugotavlja, da so države BRICS pokazale sposobnost regionalnega vključevanja in s tem sposobnost sodelovanja v večpolarnih sistemih upravljanja; meni, da to še dodatno dokazuje potencialni interes držav BRICS, da prispevajo k upravljanju na svetovni ravni; zato ugotavlja, da so države BRICS in druge države v vzponu v procesu opredeljevanja svojih strateških usmeritev v zunanji politiki ter da tako postajajo partnerice razvitih držav in podpornice sistema svetovnega reda, ki temelji na splošnih vrednotah, partnerstvu in vključenosti;
Notes that BRICS have shown regional integration capacity and hence the capacity to engage in multipolar governance systems; believes that this demonstrates further the potential interest of the BRICS in contributing to global governance; takes the view, therefore, that the BRICS and other emerging countries are in the process of defining their strategic direction in foreign policy terms and thus becoming partners of emerged powers and supporters of a global governance system based on universal values, partnership and inclusiveness;
meni, da bodo v luči političnih in gospodarskih interesov ter obsega, regionalne vloge in prizadevanj države BRICS morda poskušale v zunanjepolitičnem smislu delovati kot skupina, vendar se zaveda tudi pomena razsežnosti posameznih držav; v zvezi s tem meni, da bi se morala EU poleg držav BRICS kot morebitno enotne skupine v smislu zunanje politike osredotočiti tudi na posamezne države tega bloka, pri tem pa ohraniti sistemski in usklajen pristop; v zvezi s tem meni, da bo tak pristop EU omogočil, da bo prek partnerstev s posameznimi državami BRICS gradila ekonomije obsega, v največji možni meri uveljavljala svoje interese in vlogo v različnih regijah ter prispevala k utrjevanju večpolarne ureditve s političnim in gospodarskim ravnovesjem med razvitimi gospodarstvi in gospodarstvi v vzponu na podlagi vključujočega sistema, temelječega na dialogu, partnerstvu ter dvostranskih in večstranskih partnerstvih;
Believes that, in light of their political and economic interests and their scale, regional role and aspirations, the BRICS may attempt to act as a group in foreign policy terms, but acknowledges that individual dimensions are also relevant; considers, in this connection, that besides focusing on the BRICS as a potentially cohesive group of States in foreign policy terms, the EU should focus also on the BRICS on a country-by-country basis, whilst maintaining a systemic and coordinated approach; takes the view, in this regard, that such an approach will enable the EU to build up economies of scale through partnerships with individual BRICS, maximise its interests and role in the various regions and contribute to the consolidation of a multipolar order with a political and economic balance between emerged and emerging economies, on the basis of an inclusive system based on dialogue, partnership and bilateral or multilateral partnerships;
poleg tega meni, da bi morale znatne razlike v političnih in gospodarskih sistemih, demografskih in družbenih trendih ter v zunanjih politikah držav BRICS vplivati na različno politiko EU do teh držav in se v njej tudi odražati, z namenom ustvarjanja sinergij s posameznimi državami BRICS in drugimi državami v vzponu ter preprečevanja nastanka ali utrditve morebitnih enotnih alternativnih skupin držav v smislu zunanje politike; v tem okviru poziva EU in njene države članice, naj preprečujejo utrjevanje blokov razvitih držav in držav v razvoju ter strateško konkurenco med njimi; ugotavlja, da mora Evropa zato, da bi lahko spodbujala mednarodno kolektivno ukrepanje in reformo svetovnega reda, izkoristiti raznoliki nabor dvostranskih in večstranskih odnosov ter odnosov na nedržavni ravni in se zatekati h koalicijam na podlagi posameznih vprašanj, ki presegajo ločnice med razvitimi državami in državami v vzponu;
Believes further that the considerable divergences in the political and economic systems, demographic and social trends, and foreign policy outlooks of the BRICS should inform, and be reflected in, a nuanced EU policy towards these countries aimed at creating synergies with individual BRICS countries and other emerging countries and at discouraging the creation or consolidation of potentially cohesive alternative groups of States in foreign policy terms; urges the EU and its Member States, in this context, to discourage the entrenchment of and strategic competition between blocs of emerged and emerging powers, respectively; contends that, in order to promote international collective action and the reform of global governance, the EU must leverage a diverse range of bilateral, multilateral and non-state interactions, and harness issue-based coalitions that cut across the emerged/emerging world divide;
meni, da mora EU zavzeti stališče v zvezi z vzpostavitvijo tesnejših odnosov z državami BRICS, četudi vizija EU glede zavezujočih obveznosti in institucionaliziranih režimov ni nujno vedno enaka viziji držav BRICS; meni tudi, da bi lahko v zameno za močnejšo zastopanost v zadevnih mednarodnih institucijah pridobili podporo držav BRICS za učinkovito večstranskost; vztraja pri tem, da bi bilo treba izzive, ki jih prinaša pomembnejša vloga držav BRICS, obravnavati kot priložnost, ne kot težavo;
Believes that the EU should formulate its position regarding a closer relationship with the BRICS, even taking into account the fact that the EU's vision and the BRICS countries' vision with regard to binding commitments and institutionalised regimes may not necessarily always be the same; believes also that support from the BRICS countries for effective multilateralism might be gained in exchange for stronger representation in relevant international institutions; insists that the challenges posed by the rise of the BRICS should be seen as an opportunity rather than a problem;
meni, da morajo odnosi z državami BRICS temeljiti na dvostranskih dialogih, ki zajemajo in spodbujajo nadaljnjo demokratizacijo in utrjevanje pravne države, dobro upravljanje, zbliževanje pravnih ureditev, usklajevanje skupnih stališč na mednarodnih forumih in krepitev odnosov z EU;
Takes the view that relations with the BRICS countries should be built upon bilateral dialogues focusing on and fostering further democratisation and the consolidation of the rule of law, good governance, regulatory convergence, coordination of common positions in international fora and intensified relations with the EU;
opozarja na pomen, ki ga ima Brazilija kot vodilna sila procesa regionalnega povezovanja Mercosur; pozdravlja obnovljen skupni akcijski načrt o strateškem partnerstvu 2012–2014 med EU in Brazilijo ter skupne zaveze na področju spodbujanja demokracije in reform večstranskega sistema upravljanja; poziva obe strani, naj spoštujeta svoje obveznosti in prispevata k reformi svetovne finančne strukture; opozarja, da je predsednik Rousseff ponudil podporo EU pri premagovanju krize državnega dolga, in priznava povezavo med njima; izraža podporo uravnoteženemu in pravičnemu zaključku razvojne agende iz Dohe in sklenitvi pridružitvenega sporazuma med EU in Mercosurjem, ki bo najpomembnejši pridružitveni sporazum, kar jih je EU kdaj podpisala, saj zajema 750 milijonov ljudi in trgovino v vrednosti 125 milijard dolarjev letno; je seznanjen z zahtevo Brazilije za popolno odpravo vizumov in poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj pripravi predlog v zvezi s tem;
Underscores the importance of Brazil as a leading power of the MERCOSUR regional integration process; welcomes the renewed EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership Joint Action Plan 2012-2014, and the mutual commitments made in the areas of democracy promotion and reforms of the multilateral system of governance; urges both sides to honour their commitments and contribute to the reform of the world's financial architecture; recalls the offer made by President Rousseff regarding support for the EU to overcome its sovereign-debt crisis, and acknowledges the interrelation between both; expresses its support for a balanced and fair conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda and the EU-MERCOSUR Association Agreement, which will be the most important association agreement ever signed by the EU, encompassing 750 million people and trade worth USD 125 billion a year; takes note of Brazil's request to have full visa liberalisation and asks the Commission to present a proposal in this regard;
opozarja na nepogrešljivo vlogo strateškega partnerstva med EU in Rusijo pri ohranjanju miru in varnosti v Evropi, krepitvi trgovinskega in gospodarskega razvoja, ohranjanju zanesljive oskrbe z energijo in soočanju z nadnacionalnimi izzivi; meni, da bo dolgoročno vzpon azijskih sil najverjetneje olajšal nadaljnje zbliževanje interesov in tesnejše strateško sodelovanje med EU in Rusijo; meni, da je takšno sodelovanje ključno za napredek pri vprašanjih svetovnega pomena, kot so širjenje jedrskega orožja, terorizem, podnebne spremembe ali nezakonito preseljevanje;
Highlights the indispensable role of the EU-Russia strategic partnership in maintaining peace and security in Europe, enhancing trade and economic development, preserving energy security, and addressing transnational challenges; considers that, in the long-term, the rise of Asian powers is likely to facilitate further alignment of interests and closer strategic cooperation between the EU and Russia; believes that such cooperation is vital for progress on issues of global importance, such as nuclear proliferation, terrorism, climate change or illegal migration;
poudarja pomen in potencial strateškega partnerstva med EU in Indijo; meni, da je treba v času svetovne gospodarske krize vprašanja, kot so družbena kriza, podnebne spremembe, migracijski tokovi in svetovna varnost, reševati v okviru bolj celovitega partnerstva med Indijo in EU; ugotavlja tudi, da potekajoča pogajanja o sporazumu o prosti trgovini krepijo odnose med EU in Indijo; kljub vsemu meni, da ti odnosi ne bi smeli biti omejeni zgolj na trgovinska vprašanja; si želi ponovne vzpostavitve podobnega združenja, kot je delegacija za odnose z Indijo v Evropskem parlamentu, na drugi strani, saj so bile izkušnje s skupino za prijateljstvo med Indijo in Evropo, ki je v indijskem parlamentu delovala do volitev leta 2009, dobre;
Highlights the importance and potential of the EU-India strategic partnership; considers that, in the current global economic crisis, issues such as the social crisis, climate change, migration flows and global security should be addressed in a more comprehensive partnership between India and the EU; notes also that the ongoing free-trade agreement negotiations are reinforcing EU-India relations: considers, however, that this relationship should not be limited to trade issues; would welcome the re-establishment of a counterpart grouping to the European Parliament Delegation for relations with India ,following the experience of the India-Europe Friendship Group, which existed in the Indian Parliament before its 2009 elections;
poudarja pomen Kitajske kot velike gospodarske sile in opozarja na njeno ključno vlogo pri okrevanju svetovnega gospodarstva; v zvezi s tem opominja, da mora Kitajska deset let po vstopu v Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo izpolniti svoje obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz tega članstva; poziva EU in njene države članice ter Kitajsko, naj obravnavajo skupne izzive in grožnje mednarodnemu miru in varnosti, zlasti z boljšim sodelovanjem pri iskanju diplomatske rešitve jedrske krize v Iranu; poziva obe strani, naj se zavzemata za večje ravnovesje v medsebojni trgovini, zlasti s tem, da okrepita prizadevanja za zaključek pogajanj o novem sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, da bo ta okvir izpolnil potencial strateškega partnerstva med EU in Kitajsko;
Underscores the importance of China as a major economic power and highlights its essential role in global economic recovery; recalls, in this connection, the need for China to meet its agreed WTO obligations, ten years after its accession; calls on the EU and its Member States and China, furthermore, to tackle common challenges and threats to international peace and security, in particular through improved cooperation on a diplomatic solution to Iran's nuclear crisis; urges both sides to foster more balanced trade between them, notably by stepping up their efforts to conclude negotiations on a new partnership and cooperation agreement, in order for this framework to fulfil the potential of the EU-China strategic partnership;
poudarja strateško naravo odnosov med EU in Južno Afriko; pozdravlja pozitivne rezultate četrtega vrha med EU in Afriko septembra 2011, zlasti zbližanje stališč o položaju v Libiji; poziva EU in Južno Afriko, naj čim prej skleneta pogajanja o novem sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu; meni, da lahko Južna Afrika, glede na njen uspešen in miren prehod v demokracijo ter njeno vlogo regionalne sile, postane pomembna sila pri spodbujanju demokracije in dobrega upravljanja, pospeševanju regionalnega gospodarskega povezovanja in podpiranju narodne sprave po vsej Afriki ter ključna partnerica EU pri teh prizadevanjih; poudarja pomen tesnega sodelovanja med EU in Južno Afriko na področju podnebnih sprememb, trajnostnega razvoja in reform mednarodnih institucij;
Underscores the strategic nature of EU-South Africa relations; welcomes the positive outcome of the fourth EU-Africa summit of September 2011, in particular the convergence of views on the situation in Libya; urges the EU and South Africa to conclude, as soon as possible, negotiations on a new Economic and Partnership Agreement; contends that South Africa, given its record of successful and peaceful transition to democracy and its role as a regional power, can be a major force in promoting democracy and good governance, fostering regional economic integration, and supporting national reconciliation across Africa, and a key partner for the EU in these efforts; stresses the importance of close cooperation between the EU and South Africa on climate change, sustainable development and reforms of international institutions;
meni, da je glede na vse večjo vlogo držav BRICS in drugih sil v vzponu ter glede na nastajajoči večpolarni sistem upravljanja skupina G20 koristen in ustrezen forum za doseganje konsenza in sprejemanje odločitev v vključujočem procesu, ki temelji na partnerstvu in lahko omogoči zbliževanje, tudi usklajevanje predpisov; meni, da lahko kljub vse večji pomembnosti skupine G-20 skupina G-7 ostane ključni forum za posvetovanje, usklajevanje in doseganje konsenza med uveljavljenimi državami, kadar želijo vzpostaviti dialog z državami BRICS in drugimi silami v vzponu ter pred sestanki skupine G-20; meni, da bi bilo treba obstoj skupine G-8 prav tako izkoristiti za zbliževanje stališč z Rusijo, tako da bi se lahko usklajeno in učinkovito soočali s skupnimi izzivi; podpira parlamentarno razsežnost skupine G-20 in meni, da jo je treba še bolj okrepiti in vključiti v procese odločanja, da bi poglobili demokratični dialog in poostrili nadzor; podpira tudi ustanovitev vzporednega posvetovalnega foruma G-20, ki bo združeval nevladne organizacije in vodilne predstavnike civilne družbe in gospodarstva iz držav članic G-20;
Believes that, in light of the increasing relevance of the BRICS and other emerging powers and the multipolar system of global governance that is taking shape, the G-20 could prove a useful and particularly appropriate forum for consensus building and for a decision-making process which is inclusive, based on partnership and able to foster convergence, including regulatory convergence; takes the view that, notwithstanding the increasing relevance of the G-20, the G-7 could play a key role as a consultative, coordinating and consensus-building forum for the established powers with a view to dialogue with the BRICS and other emerging powers, and ahead of G-20 meetings; considers that the existence of the G-8 should also be harnessed in an effort to reconcile positions with Russia so that common challenges can be addressed in a coordinated and effective manner; supports the G-20 parliamentary dimension and believes that it should be further consolidated and involved in the decision-making processes to ensure reinforced democratic dialogue and scrutiny; supports also the creation of a parallel G-20 consultative forum bringing together non-governmental organisations and leading representatives of civil society and business from G-20 states;