natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ali KNPVP
or UCITS,
ali KNPVP
or a UCITS
(b) dovoljenje, ki so ga izdali KNPVP,
(b) with respect to the UCITS it has approved,
takoj odvzamejo.
without delay.
depozitar ali
a depositary or
ne dovoli hramba sredstev vlagateljev.
is unable to make alternative arrangements which comply with the conditions imposed in paragraph 3, it shall not be allowed to be entrusted with investors' assets.
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 6
Directive 97/9/EC Article 6
ali KNPVP
or UCITS' authorization
še naprej zagotavlja za investicijske posle, ki so bili sklenjeni pred odvzemom.
shall continue to be provided in respect of investment business transacted up to the time of that withdrawal.
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 8 – odstavek 1 1.
Directive 97/9/EC Article 8 – paragraph 1 1.
Kritje, predvideno v členu 4(1) in (3), se uporablja za vlagateljevo skupno terjatev do istega investicijskega podjetja
The cover provided for in Article 4(1) and (3) shall apply to the investor's aggregate claim on the same investment firm
ali KNPVP
or the same UCITS
na podlagi te direktive ne glede na število računov, valuto in lokacijo v Uniji.
under this Directive irrespective of the number of accounts, the currency and location within the Union.
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 8 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 2
Directive 97/9/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 8 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 2 a (novo)
Directive 97/9/EC Article 8 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 8 – odstavek 3 – pododstavek 1
Directive 97/9/EC Article 8 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Če vlagatelj ni upravičen do hranjenih zneskov ali
Where an investor is not entitled to the sums or
, prejme odškodnino oseba, ki je upravičena, če je identiteta te osebe ugotovljena ali se lahko ugotovi pred datumom ugotovitve ali odločbe iz
held, the person who is entitled shall receive the compensation, provided that that person has been or can be identified before the date of the determination or ruling referred to in
člena 2(2) in (2b)
Article 2(2) and (2b)
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 2
Directive 97/9/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Shema se ne more sklicevati na dejstvo, da je potekel rok, da bi odklonila
The fact that that period has expired may not be invoked by the scheme to deny
kritje vlagatelja, ki ni mogel pravočasno uveljaviti svoje pravice do odškodnine.
coverage to an investor who has been unable to assert his right to compensation in time.
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 2 a (novo)
Directive 97/9/EC Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Investicijska podjetja na svojem spletnem mestu razkrijejo vse informacije o pogojih, ki zadevajo pokritje, in ukrepih, ki jih je treba sprejeti za dosego plačila v skladu s to direktivo.
Investment firms shall disclose on their websites, all information concerning the terms and conditions regarding the coverage and the steps to be taken to receive the payment in accordance with this Directive.
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 9 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 6
Directive 97/9/EC Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
z delegiranimi akti
, by means of
v skladu s členom 13a
delegated acts in accordance with Article 13a
za določitev postopka za obravnavo terjatev vlagateljev
to determine the procedure to deal with investors' claims
in tehničnih meril za izračun izgube vrednosti KNPVP zaradi dogodkov iz člena 2(2b) in (2c)
and the technical criteria to calculate the loss of value of a UCITS as a result of the events mentioned under Article 2(2b) and (2c)
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 9 – odstavek 3 3.
Directive 97/9/EC Article 9 – paragraph 3 3.
, ali pa je predmet tožbe zaradi kršitve Direktive 2003/6/ES.
or is the subject of action for contravention of Directive 2003/6/EC, the compensation scheme may suspend any payment pending the judgment of the court or determination of a competent authority.
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 10 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1 1.
Directive 97/9/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 1.
Države članice zagotovijo, da vsako investicijsko podjetje
Member States shall ensure that each investment firm
sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, da obstoječim in zainteresiranim vlagateljem da na voljo podatke, ki so potrebni za določitev odškodninske sheme za vlagatelje, katere član je investicijsko podjetje
takes appropriate measures to make available to actual and intending investors the information necessary for the identification of the investor-compensation scheme of which the investment firm
in njegove podružnice v Uniji, ali katerega koli alternativnega sporazuma, ki je zagotovljen na podlagi drugega pododstavka člena 2(1) ali člena 5(3).
and its branches within the Union are members or any alternative arrangement provided for under the second subparagraph of Article 2 (1) or Article 5 (3).
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 10 – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Directive 97/9/EC Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 12 – odstavek 1 1.
Directive 97/9/EC Article 12 – paragraph 1 1.
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 12 – odstavek 3
Directive 97/9/EC Article 12 – paragraph 3
Direktiva 97/9/ES Člen 12 – odstavek 4 4.
Directive 97/9/EC Article 12 – paragraph 4 4.
Če je tretja oseba, ki hrani finančne instrumente vlagatelja v zvezi z investicijskim poslom,
If the third party that holds financial instruments belonging to an investor in relation to investment business
ali depozitar ali tretja oseba, ki so ji bila zaupana sredstva KNPVP,
or the depositary or third party to whom the assets of the UCITS have been entrusted are
v tretji državi, katere sodni sistem shemi ne dovoljuje pravice do zamenjave za pravice investicijskega podjetja
located in a third country in which the judiciary system does not allow the scheme to subrogate to the rights of the investment firm
ali KNPVP
or the UCITS
, države članice zagotovijo, da investicijsko podjetje
Member States shall ensure that the investment firm
iz člena 4a(9) ter člena 9(2) se
Article 4a(9) and Article 9(2) shall be conferred on the Commission for
Komisiji dodeli
an indeterminate
Pooblastilo za sprejetje delegiranih aktov se
The power to adopt delegated acts
na Komisijo prenese pod pogoji iz tega člena
is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article
Prenos pooblastil se tiho podaljša za enako dolgo obdobje, razen če Evropski parlament ali Svet temu nasprotuje.
The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension.
Pooblastilo za sprejetje delegiranih aktov iz člena 4(1a), pododstavka 2 in 3 člena 4a(2), pododstavka 2a člena 4a(3), člena 4a(9) ter člena 9(2) lahko Evropski parlament ali Svet kadarkoli prekliče.
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 4(1a), subparagraphs 2 and 3 of Article 4a(2), subparagraph 2a of Article 4a(3), Article 4a(9) and Article 9(2) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Delegiran akt, sprejet v skladu s členom 4(1a), pododstavkom 2 in 3 člena 4a(2), pododstavkom 2a člena 4a(3), členom 4a(9) in členom 9(2) začnejo veljati, le če niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotuje v roku treh mesecev od uradnega obvestila o aktu Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, ali če pred iztekom omenjenega roka Evropski parlamenti in Svet oba seznanita Komisijo, da ne nameravata nasprotovati sprejetju aktov.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 4(1a), subparagraph 2 and 3 of Article 4a(2), subparagraph 2a of Article 4a(3), Article 4a(9) and Article 9(2) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of three months of the notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expire of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
* UL: prosimo, vstavite datum začetka veljavnosti direktive o spremembi.
* OJ: please insert the date of entry into force of the amending Directive.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. julija 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2001/18/ES glede možnosti držav članic, da omejijo ali prepovejo gojenje GSO na svojem ozemlju ( KOM(2010)0375 – C7-0178/2010 – 2010/0208(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 5 July 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2001/18/EC as regards the possibility for the Member States to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory ( COM(2010)0375 – C7-0178/2010 – 2010/0208(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0375 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0375 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0178/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0178/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 9. decembra 2010 UL C 54, 19.2.2011, str.
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 9 December 2010 OJ C 54, 19.2.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 28. januarja 2011 Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 28 January 2011 Not yet published in the Official Journal.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenja Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0170/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0170/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article
Na podlagi tega sklopa zakonodaje se bo za vsak GSO za gojenje posebej ocenilo tveganje, preden bo odobren za dajanje na trg Unije.
Under this set of legislation, GMOs for cultivation shall undergo an individual risk assessment before being authorised to be placed on the Union market.
Na podlagi tega sklopa zakonodaje se bo za vsak GSO za gojenje posebej ocenilo tveganje, preden bo odobren za dajanje na trg Unije
Under this set of legislation, GMOs for cultivation shall undergo an individual risk assessment before being authorised to be placed on the Union market
, ob upoštevanju neposrednih in posrednih učinkov, takojšnih učinkov, učinkov z zakasnitvijo ter kumulativnih dolgoročnih učinkov na zdravje ljudi in okolje, v skladu s Prilogo II Direktive 2001/18/ES
, taking into account, in accordance with Annex II of Directive 2001/18/EC, the direct, indirect, immediate and delayed effects, as well as the cumulative long-term effects, on human health and the environment
Stremeti je treba k doseganju in ohranjanje enake ravni zaščite zdravja in okolja na vsem ozemlju Unije.
A uniform high level of protection of health and the environment should be achieved and maintained throughout the territory of the Union.
Komisija in države članice bi morale prednostno zagotoviti izvedbo sklepov Sveta za okolje z dne 4. decembra 2008, in sicer pravilno izvajanje pravnih zahtev iz Priloge II Direktive 2001/18/ES o oceni tveganja GSO.
The Commission and Member States should ensure, as a priority, the implementation of the Environment Council Conclusions adopted on 4 December 2008, namely a proper implementation of the legal requirements laid down in Annex II of Directive 2001/18/EC for the risk assessment of GMOs.
Strogo bi bilo treba oceniti zlasti dolgoročne vplive gensko spremenjenih pridelkov na okolje , pa tudi njihove morebitne učinke na neciljne organizme; pri tem bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati značilnosti prejemnih okolij in zemljepisnih območij, v katerih se gensko spremenjene rastline smejo gojiti, oceniti pa bi bilo treba tudi morebitne posledice za okolje, ki jih povzročijo spremembe v uporabi herbicidov, povezanih z na herbicide odpornimi genetsko spremenjenimi rastlinami.
In particular, the long-term environmental effects of GM crops, as well as their potential effects on non-target organisms, should be rigorously assessed; the characteristics of the receiving environments and the geographical areas in which GM plants may be cultivated should be duly taken into account; and the potential environmental consequences brought about by changes in the use of herbicides linked to herbicide-tolerant GM crops should be assessed.
Te smernice ne bi smele temeljiti le na načelu snovne enakovrednosti ali na primerjalni analizi varnosti in bi morale omogočiti jasno opredelitev dolgoročnih in posrednih učinkov ter znanstvenih negotovosti.
Those guidelines should not be based only on the principle of substantial equivalence or on the concept of a comparative safety assessment, and should make it possible to clearly identify direct and indirect long-term effects, as well as scientific uncertainties.
Evropska agencija za varnost hrane (EFSA) in države članice bi morale stremeti k oblikovanju široke mreže znanstvenih organizacij z vseh področij, tudi ekoloških, in bi morale sodelovati, tako da bi že v zgodnji fazi ugotovili, ali med znanstvenimi mnenji prihaja do morebitnih razhajanj, tako da bi rešili oziroma razjasnili sporna znanstvena vprašanja.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the Member States should aim to establish an extensive network of scientific organisations representing all disciplines including those relating to ecological issues, and should cooperate to identify at an early stage any potential divergence between scientific opinions with a view to resolving or clarifying the contentious scientific issues.
Komisija in države članice bi morale zagotoviti potrebna sredstva za neodvisne raziskave o morebitnih tveganjih GSO, pa tudi, da izvrševanje pravic intelektualne lastnine ne bi onemogočalo neodvisnim raziskovalcem dostopa do ustreznega gradiva.
The Commission and the Member States should ensure that the necessary resources for independent research on the potential risks of GMOs are secured, and that the enforcement of intellectual property rights does not prevent independent researchers from accessing all relevant material.
V okviru te uredbe in pri njenem izvajanju je treba upoštevati previdnostno načelo.
There is a need for the precautionary principle to be taken into account in the framework of this Regulation and when implementing it.
Glede na pomembnost znanstvenih dokazov pri odločanju o odobritvi ali prepovedi GSO, bi morala Evropska agencija za varnost hrane vsako leto zbrati in objaviti rezultate raziskav glede tveganja ali dokazov o naključni prisotnosti, onesnaženju ali nevarnosti zaradi za okolje ali zdravje ljudi zaradi GSO, in sicer za vsak primer posebej.
Given the importance of scientific evidence in taking decisions on the prohibition or approval of GMOs, EFSA and the Member States should collect and publish annually the results of research regarding the risk or evidence of any accidental presence, contamination or danger to the environment or human health of GMOs, on a case-by-case basis.
Izkušnje kažejo, da je gojenje GSO vprašanje, ki se temeljiteje obravnava v državah članicah na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni.
Experience has shown that cultivation of GMOs is an issue which is more thoroughly addressed by Member States, either at central or at regional and local level.
V nasprotju z vprašanji pri dajanju
Contrary to
na trg in uvozu GSO
issues related to the placing on the market and the import of GMOs
je treba še naprej urejati na ravni EU zaradi ohranitve notranjega trga,
should remain regulated at EU level to preserve the internal market, cultivation
je bilo ugotovljeno, da je
has been acknowledged as
gojenje GSO vprašanje z izrazito
an issue with a strong
gojenje GSO na svojem ozemlju po tem, ko je bil GSO zakonito odobren za dajanje na trg EU.
cultivation of GMOs in their territory after the GMO has been legally authorised to be placed on the EU market.
bi utegnila biti v nekaterih primerih potrebna večja prožnost, saj gre za
might require more flexibility in certain instances as it is
vprašanje z izrazito
an issue with a strong
, ki je še posebej pomembno za samoodločanje držav članic
and an issue of particular importance for the self-determination of Member States
Vendar prožnost ne bi smela ogrožati skupnega postopka odobritve.
The common authorisation procedure should not be adversely affected by such flexibility.
Usklajene okoljske in zdravstvene ocene tveganja morda vendarle ne bi zajele vseh možnih vplivov gojenja GSO v različnih regijah in ekosistemih.
However, the harmonised environmental and health risks assessment might not address all possible impacts of GMO cultivation in different regions and local ecosystems.
V skladu s členom 2(2) PDEU je zato treba državam članicam dati možnost, da sprejmejo
In accordance with Article 2(2) TFEU Member States should therefore be entitled to have a possibility to adopt
zavezujoče pravne predpise
binding legislative provisions
za učinkovito gojenje GSO na svojem ozemlju po tem, ko je bil GSO zakonito odobren za dajanje na trg EU.
concerning the cultivation of GMOs in their territory after the GMO has been legally authorised to be placed on the EU market.
na podlagi člena 26a Direktive 2001/18/ES za preprečevanje nenamerne prisotnosti GSO v drugih proizvodih.
to take by application of Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in other products.
Pri tem se zdi primerno, da se državam članicam v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti prizna več
In this context, it appears appropriate to grant to Member States, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, more
na podlagi člena 26a Direktive 2001/18/ES za preprečevanje nenamerne prisotnosti GSO v drugih proizvodih
to take by application of Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in other products
Zato je treba državam članicam dovoliti, da sprejmejo ukrepe za omejitev ali prepoved gojenja
Member States should therefore be authorised to adopt measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation of
vseh ali nekaterih
all or
tudi za gensko spremenjene sorte semen in razmnoževalnega materiala rastlin, ki se dajejo na trg v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo o trženju semen in razmnoževalnega materiala rastlin ter zlasti v skladu z direktivama 2002/53/ES in 2002/55/ES.
to genetically modified varieties of seed and plant propagating material which are placed on the market in accordance with relevant legislation on the marketing of seeds and plant propagating material and, in particular, in accordance with Directives 2002/53/EC and 2002/55/EC.
Zato je treba državam članicam dovoliti, da
Member States should therefore be authorised to adopt
za vsak primer posebej
, on a case-by-case basis,
, nekaterih skupin GSO ali vseh GSO
or groups of GMOs or of all GMOs
na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu, ter te ukrepe spremenijo, kot se jim zdi ustrezno, na vseh stopnjah odobritve ali ponovne odobritve zadevnih GSO ali njihovega umika s trga.
in all or part of their territory, and respectively amend those measures as they deem appropriate, at all stages of the authorisation, re-authorisation or withdrawal from the market of the concerned GMOs.
V skladu s pravnim okvirom za odobritev GSO država članica ne more spremeniti ravni zaščite zdravja ljudi ali živali in okolja v EU in tak položaj je treba ohraniti.
According to the legal framework for the authorisation of GMOs, the level of protection of human/animal health and of the environment chosen in the EU cannot be revised by a Member State and this situation must not be altered.
Poleg tega morajo biti ti ukrepi v skladu s Pogodbama, zlasti glede načela nerazlikovanja med nacionalnimi in tujimi proizvodi ter členov 34 in 36 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije
Those measures should furthermore be in conformity with the Treaties, in particular as regards the principle of non discrimination between national and non national products and Articles 34 and 36 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
, in z ustreznimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi Unije, zlasti v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji
as well as with the relevant international obligations of the Union, notably in the context of the World Trade Organisation
Vendar lahko države članice ukrepe za omejitev ali prepoved gojenja vseh ali nekaterih GSO na svojem celotnem ozemlju ali njegovem delu sprejmejo na podlagi razlogov javnega interesa.
However Member States may adopt measures restricting or prohibiting the cultivation of all or particular GMOs in all or part of their territory on the basis of grounds relating to the public interest.
Ukrepi morajo biti ustrezno znanstveno utemeljeni ali temeljiti na razlogih obvladovanja tveganja ali drugih upravičenih razlogih, do katerih pride zaradi namernega sproščanja ali dajanja GSO na trg.
Those measures should be duly justified on scientific grounds or on grounds relating to risk management or other legitimate factors which might arise from the deliberate release or the placing on the market of GMOs.
Poleg tega morajo biti ti ukrepi
Those measures should furthermore be
sorazmerni in
proportionate and
v skladu s Pogodbama, zlasti glede načela nerazlikovanja med nacionalnimi in tujimi proizvodi ter členov 34 in 36 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
in conformity with the Treaties, in particular as regards the principle of non discrimination between national and non national products and Articles 34 and 36 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Omejitve ali prepovedi gojenja nekaterih GSO s strani držav članic ne smejo preprečevati ali omejevati uporabe dovoljenih GSO v drugih državah članicah, pod pogojem, da so v veljavi učinkoviti ukrepi za preprečevanje čezmejne okužbe.
Restrictions on or prohibitions of cultivation of particular GMOs by a Member State should not prevent or restrict the use of authorised GMOs by other Member States, provided effective measures are taken to prevent cross-border contamination.
Državam članicam bi bilo treba dovoliti, da so podlaga za njihove ukrepe iz člena 26b znanstveno utemeljeni razlogi, povezani z okoljskimi posledicami, ki jih lahko povzroči namerno sproščanje GSO ali njihovo dajanje na trg, poleg okoljskih posledic, preučenih pri znanstveni oceni škodljivih vplivov na okolje v skladu z delom C te direktive ali na podlagi obvladovanja tveganja.
Member States should be allowed to base the measures referred to in Article 26b on duly justified grounds relating to local or regional environmental impacts which might arise from the deliberate release or the placing on the market of GMOs and which are complementary to the environmental impacts examined during the scientific assessment of the impacts on the environment conducted under Part C of this Directive, or grounds relating to risk management.
Ti razlogi lahko zajemajo:
Those grounds may include:
– ohranjanje in razvoj kmetijskih praks, ki najbolje omogočajo uskladitev proizvodnje in trajnost ekosistemov;
- the maintenance and development of agricultural practices which offer a better potential to reconcile production with ecosystem sustainability;
– neobstoječe ali pomanjkljive podatke o morebitnih škodljivih vplivih sproščanja GSO na lokalno ali regionalno okolje države članice, tudi na njeno biotsko raznovrstnost.
- the absence or lack of adequate data concerning the potential negative impacts of the release of GMOs on the local or regional environment of a Member State , including on biodiversity.
Ukrepi lahko temeljijo tudi na razlogih, povezanih s socialno-ekonomskimi vplivi.
The measures may also be based on grounds relating to socio-economic impacts.