natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da morajo kazalniki za določanje regionalnih subvencij iz strukturnih skladov in kohezijskega sklada temeljiti na najnovejših statističnih podatkih Eurostata, da bi v celoti upoštevali ekonomski in socialni učinek krize na regije;
Considers that the indicators determining regional subsidies from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund must be based on Eurostat's most recent statistical data, so as to take full account of the economic and social impact of the crisis on the regions;
zahteva, da se učinkovitost in preglednost Evropskega socialnega sklada okrepi z dejavnostmi, ki bodo bolj usmerjene v rezultate, in poziva k vnaprejšnji opredelitvi jasnih in merljivih ciljev in kazalnikov rezultatov, povezanih neposredno z namenom financiranja, ki bodo merili zlasti uspeh pri boju proti revščini in socialni izključenosti ter vključevanju v visokokakovostno zaposlitev; meni, da je treba v opredelitev teh ciljev in kazalnikov vključiti zainteresirane strani na vseh ravneh upravljanja in da jih je treba opredeliti jasno in pravočasno pred začetkom financiranja, da bodo lahko države članice in Komisija ocenile dosežene rezultate in uporabile izkušnje v naslednjem obdobju načrtovanja; podpira predlog Komisije, da bi bilo dodeljevanje sredstev Evropskega socialnega sklada odvisno od predhodne izpolnitve pogojev, vključno s pogojem glede prenosa zakonodaje in ciljev EU, ki so nujno potrebni za uspešnost ukrepov Evropskega socialnega sklada, ter izvajanja strukturnih reform in zagotavljanja ustreznih upravnih zmogljivosti; poudarja, da usmerjenost v rezultate ne sme prikrajšati manjših upravičencev ali jim postavljati novih ovir za dostop ali izpostavljati tveganjem;
Calls for the effectiveness and transparency of the ESF to be increased through more results-oriented action and asks for the ex ante setting of clear and measurable targets and outcome indicators, directly linked to the purpose of the funding, which measure, in particular, success in the fight against poverty and social exclusion and integration into high-quality employment; considers that stakeholders at all levels of governance need to be involved in the setting of these targets and indicators and that the latter should be clearly defined in good time prior to the provision of funding, so that both the Member States and the Commission can evaluate the results achieved and use the experience during the next planning phase; supports the Commission's proposal to make the allocation of ESF money dependent on ex ante conditionality, including a precondition regarding the transposition of EU legislation and EU objectives, which are indispensable for the success of ESF measures, as well as structural reforms and adequate administrative capacities; stresses that result-orientation must not lead to small beneficiaries being disadvantaged or exposed either to new barriers to access or to risks;
meni, da je javno in zasebno sofinanciranje eno temeljnih načel kohezijske politike; zahteva pregled zgornje meje sredstev EU, ki bi morala bolj upoštevati regionalne stopnje razvoja, evropsko dodano vrednost in vrste financiranih ukrepov ter se ustrezno zvišati ali znižati;
Regards public and private co-financing as one of the basic principles of cohesion policy; calls for a review of the percentage ceiling for EU funding – which should take more account of regional development levels, European added value and the types of measure funded and should be raised or lowered accordingly;
poziva države članice in regije, naj odobrena sredstva za sofinanciranje načrtujejo daljnovidno in jih okrepijo s finančnim inženiringom;
Calls on the Member States and regions to look ahead when programming co-financing appropriations and to boost them by means of financial engineering;
zahteva, naj se pri neposrednih subvencijah za podjetja upošteva, da sredstva kohezijske politike ne vplivajo toliko na odločitve podjetij, zlasti velikih, o odprtju obrata na dani lokaciji, ampak si sredstva prilastijo podjetja, ki so že prej sprejela odločitev (mrtvi učinek), in zato poziva, da se pomoč velikim zasebnim podjetjem usmeri v naložbe v raziskave in razvoj ali da se bolj kot doslej zagotovi neposredno s financiranjem infrastrukture; poleg tega zahteva, da se v splošno ureditev o strukturnih skladih vključijo jasne določbe, ki bodo izključevale kakršnokoli financiranje EU za selitve podjetij znotraj EU ter občutno znižale prag za pregled naložb v preselitev, izključile velika podjetja iz neposrednih subvencij in omejile trajanje dejavnosti na deset let;
Calls, in connection with direct subsidies to undertakings, for it to be recognised that cohesion policy funding, rather than influencing decisions by companies – and particularly larger companies – to open a plant in a given location, tends to be pocketed by companies which have already taken such decisions (deadweight effect), and calls, therefore, for grant support for large, private undertakings to focus on investment in research and development or for it to be provided, more often than is currently the case, indirectly through infrastructure financing; also calls for clear provisions to be included in the general regulation governing the Structural Funds ruling out the provision of any EU funding for the relocation of undertakings within the Union, substantially lowering the threshold for review of relocation investments, excluding large enterprises from direct subsidies, and placing a 10-year limit on the duration of operations;;
priznava učinek vzvoda in mobilizacijske možnosti novih finančnih instrumentov ter načeloma podpira okrepljeno financiranje s posojili in zahteva, naj se uporaba obnovljivih finančnih instrumentov razširi na področja, upravičena do sredstev, ki se izkažejo za primerna; zato zahteva poenostavitev postopkov in večjo mero pravne varnosti za celotno obdobje financiranja ter vzpostavitev registra EU, ki bi prikazoval, katerim projektom so bila zagotovljena posojila in katerim subvencije; poziva k prilagodljivosti instrumentov, da bodo smiselni in izvedljivi za vse regije in mesta; meni, da bi morala odgovornost za uporabo sredstev najpozneje po koncu obdobja financiranja preiti na nacionalno raven ali raven projekta; ugotavlja, da v sedanjem obdobju niso vse države članice sprejele decentraliziranega pristopa k uporabi finančnih instrumentov, kot je JESSICA; poudarja potrebo po neposrednem dostopu za mesta;
Recognises the leverage effect of new financial instruments and their potential to mobilise investment, supports increased financing from credit in general, and calls for the use of revolving financial instruments to be extended to those areas eligible for funding which prove to be appropriate; calls for procedures to be simplified to that end and for a greater degree of legal certainty throughout the entire funding period, as well as for the establishment of an EU register showing which projects are provided with loans and which with subsidies; calls for the instruments to be adaptable, so as to ensure they are viable and feasible for all regions and cities; takes the view that at the end of a funding period, at the latest, responsibility for how the funds are spent should transfer to national level or project level; notes that during the current period not all Member States have adopted a decentralised approach to dealing with financial instruments such as JESSICA; emphasises the need for direct access for cities;
poudarja, da je treba zagotavljanje nepovratnih sredstev vedno ohraniti kot možnost in da mora biti odgovornost tistih, ki delujejo na kraju samem, da uporabijo tako sestavo sredstev, ki najbolje ustreza regionalnim potrebam;
Emphasises that the provision of grants must always be retained as an option and that it must be the responsibility of those involved on the ground to use the funding mix best suited to regional needs;
meni, da mora EIB okrepiti vlogo pri financiranju infrastrukture vseevropskih omrežij; zahteva večji poudarek na samostojnih javno-zasebnih partnerstev; meni, da ima Evropski parlament pri tem načeloma veliko odgovornost za zagotovitev preglednosti ter v zvezi z odločanjem in nadzorom;
Considers that the EIB must assume a stronger role in the financing of TEN infrastructure; calls for more emphasis to be placed on self-supporting public-private partnerships; considers, as a matter of principle, that the European Parliament has a major responsibility in this regard for ensuring transparency, as well as in relation to decision-making and supervision;
pozdravlja uspešno sodelovanje med EIB in Komisijo pri izvajanju treh skupnih pobud – JESSICA, JEREMIE in JASMINE –, ki bi naj povečale učinkovitost in uspešnost kohezijske politike ter izboljšale delovanje strukturnih skladov; poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej dejavno sprejema skupne pobude z EIB, zlasti na področju kohezijske politike, ter zagotovi finančno podporo za mala in srednja podjetja;
Welcomes the effective cooperation between the EIB and the Commission in implementing three joint initiatives – JESSICA, JEREMIE and JASMINE – which should increase the efficiency and effectiveness of cohesion policy and improve the functioning of the Structural Funds; calls on the Commission to continue to actively adopt joint initiatives with the EIB, particularly in the field of cohesion policy and to ensure financial support for SMEs;
meni, da so nepovratna globalna sredstva na podregionalni ravni ustrezno orodje za oblikovanje samostojnih inovacijskih strategij v skladu s cilji evropske regionalne politike;
Sees global grants at sub-regional level as an appropriate tool for developing independent innovation strategies in line with European regional-policy objectives;
kljub temu zavrača kvote ali obveznosti za nepovratna globalna sredstva, saj lahko nasprotujejo določitvi pomembnih prednostnih nalog, prilagojenih potrebam regij;
Rejects quotas or obligations for global grants, however, as they could run counter to the setting of overriding priorities tailored to the regions' needs;
Proračun, finančni postopki, krčenje birokracije, proračunska disciplina in finančni nadzor
Budget, financial processes, reducing red tape, budgetary discipline and financial control
meni, da se je sedemletno programsko obdobje izkazalo kot dobro, kar zadeva kohezijsko politiko, in da bi se moralo ohraniti najmanj do konca naslednjega obdobja načrtovanja (2020); vendar zahteva hitrejšo ponovno strateško oceno osnovnih pogojev, da bi se lahko še hitreje in bolj prilagodljivo odzvali na izredne dogodke (kot so finančna kriza, energetska kriza ali naravne katastrofe);
Takes the view that the system of seven-year programming periods has proved its worth regarding cohesion policy and should be retained at least until the end of the next planning period (2020); calls, however, for swifter strategic reassessment of the basic conditions so that the EU can respond even more quickly and more flexibly to exceptional events (such as the financial crisis, the energy crisis or natural disasters);
vseeno poudarja, da so se proračun EU v sedanji strukturi in mehanizmi dodeljevanja, ki temeljijo na uredbah o različnih skladih, izkazali kot učinkoviti predvsem za izvajanje kohezijske in strukturne politike, tako da so spremembe potrebne samo, če se niso obnesli postopki ali obstajajo neskladja s finančno uredbo; pri tem podpira predloge Komisije o uskladitvi pravil, ki veljajo za vse sklade, ki so na voljo za regionalni razvoj; vendar zahteva, da je treba tudi pri še tako neznatni spremembi ustaljenih, preverjenih in preizkušenih struktur postopati zelo previdno, da bi tako preprečili nepravilno delovanje in negotovost za nacionalne in regionalne upravne organe ter povečanje bremena za upravičence, zlasti tiste z majhnimi strukturami in omejenimi zmogljivostmi;
Emphasises, nonetheless, that the EU budget as currently structured and its allocation mechanisms, underpinned by the regulations governing the various funds, have proved effective in the implementation of cohesion and structural policy in particular, and that changes should therefore be made only where procedures have not worked or where the arrangements are at odds with the Financial Regulation; supports, in this context, proposals from the Commission for harmonisation of the rules governing all funds available for regional development; calls, however, for the utmost caution to be exercised when making even the most minor adjustment to established, tried and tested structures, so as to avoid malfunctions and uncertainty for national and regional administrative bodies and an increased burden for beneficiaries, particularly those with small structures and limited capacity;
meni, da je vključitev ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 v obstoječi sistem ciljev in skladov izvedljiva; zavrača razdelitev proračuna EU na pojmovne postavke „pametna“, „vključujoča“ ali „trajnostna“ rast ter razpršitev kohezijske politike na različne proračunske postavke; meni, da bi morala imeti ta politika v proračunu EU svojo postavko;
Regards the integration of the Europe 2020 objectives into the existing system of objectives and funds as feasible; rejects any division of the EU budget under the notional headings of ‘smart’, ‘inclusive’ or ‘sustainable’ growth, as well as any fragmentation of cohesion policy across various budget headings; considers that this policy should have its own heading within the EU budget;
meni, da bo kohezijska politika po letu 2013 še bolj prispevala k nadaljnjemu in trajnostnemu razvoju regij EU in da je odločilna za medsektorsko izvajanje strategije Evropa 2020, zato zahteva vsaj enako dodelitev proračunskih sredstev;
Regards post-2013 cohesion policy as being capable of making an even greater contribution to further and sustainable development of the EU regions and as the decisive policy for cross-sectoral implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy, and therefore calls for it to be allocated at least the same budget appropriations;
opozarja, da Računsko sodišče že več let poroča, da kvota napak pri plačilih na področju kohezije znaša več kot 5 %, vendar ugotavlja, da je bila pri zadnjem postopku razrešnice nižja od 11 %, kot kaže letno poročilo Računskega sodišča, ter da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi le deloma učinkoviti; nadalje poziva k pojasnitvi metode izračuna napak, saj razhajanje med podatki, ki jih posredujeta Računsko sodišče in Komisija, povzroča zmedo in nezaupanje v uradne podatke;
Recalls that the European Court of Auditors has for many years reported that payments in the area of cohesion are affected by an error rate exceeding 5%, but notes that this fell from 11% for the last discharge procedure as shown by the ECA Annual Report, and that the supervisory and control systems are only partially effective; calls in addition for clarification on the method of calculating errors, as discrepancies in figures provided by the European Court of Auditors and by the Commission lead to confusion and to mistrust of official figures;
poziva k sprejetju strožjih pravil nadzora nad nepravilnostmi pri uporabi strukturnih skladov za države članice, pri katerih je stopnja nepravilnosti pri uporabi sredstev iz strukturnih skladov visoka, ter pravil za postopek sistematične prekinitve in odložitve plačil, takoj ko so na voljo dokazi o bistvenih pomanjkljivostih v delovanju akreditiranih organov; hkrati poziva, naj se odpravijo nepotrebne kontrole v državah članicah, ki imajo ustrezen sistem za upravljanje sredstev; meni, da bi bilo treba načeli „pogodbe o zaupanju“ in „enotne revizije“ uporabljati čim pogosteje;
Calls for the adoption of stricter rules on the monitoring of irregularities in the use of the Structural Funds in respect of Member States that have a high level of irregularities in connection with the use of monies from the Structural Funds and on a procedure for the systematic interruption and suspension of payments as soon as evidence suggests significant deficiency in the functioning of the accredited authorities; calls, at the same time, for unnecessary controls to be done away with in those Member States that have a satisfactory fund management system; considers that the ‘contract of confidence’ and ‘single audit’ principles should be implemented wherever possible;
poziva države članice/javne organe, naj določijo organe ali subjekte, ki bodo edini odgovorni za pravilno upravljanje sredstev iz strukturnih skladov;
Calls on the Member States/public authorities to designate authorities or entities that will assume exclusive responsibility for the proper administration of monies from the Structural Funds;
meni, da so letne revidirane izjave o upravljanju na ravni vodij organov, ki upravljajo sredstva (plačilno mesto/upravni organ), primerno sredstvo za krepitev verige poročanja in nadzora, ter poudarja brezpogojno potrebo po vsebinski pravilnosti takšnih izjav; zato poziva k sistemu sankcij za napačne izjave; nadalje podpira namen nacionalnih izjav o zanesljivosti;
Considers the annual, tested management declarations at the level of the head of the office administering the funds (payment office/administrative authority) to be an appropriate means of strengthening the reporting and control chain and highlights the absolute necessity for these declarations to be accurate in terms of content; calls, therefore, for a penalty system to apply to false declarations; continues to endorse the purpose of national statements of assurance;
poziva Komisijo, naj že v naslednjem programskem obdobju prevzame večjo odgovornost za izboljšanje nacionalnih upravnih postopkov; v zvezi s tem meni, da so nujne poenostavitve in pojasnitve upravljanja programov podpore, zlasti na področju finančnega izvajanja in finančnega nadzora; zato meni, da je dolžnost Komisije izvajati postopke akreditacije nacionalnih oz. zveznih uprav in inšpekcijskih organov; meni, da bi uspešna akreditacija in nižje kvote napak morale zagotavljati pravico do poenostavljenega poročanja;
Calls for the Commission to have, from the start of the next programming period, greater responsibility for the improvement of national administrative procedures; considers, in this connection, that there is an urgent need for simplification and clarification of the administration of support programmes, in particular in the area of financial implementation and financial control; takes the view, therefore, that it will be incumbent on the Commission to implement accreditation procedures for national or federal-state administrative and auditing bodies; considers that entitlement to simplified and less frequent reporting should be linked to successful accreditation and a reduction in the error rate;
poleg tega poziva, da je treba okrepiti nadzorno vlogo Komisije z uvedbo sistematske prekinitve in odloga plačil, takoj ko bi ugotovljeni dokazi kazali na znatne pomanjkljivosti v delovanju akreditiranih organov; Komisijo tudi poziva, naj uvede zanesljivejše načrte za povečanje stopnje povračil napačnih plačil;
Calls, furthermore, for the supervisory role of the Commission to be strengthened by introducing systematic interruption and suspension of payments as soon as well-established evidence suggests a significant deficiency in the functioning of the accredited authorities; calls on the Commission also to put in place more robust plans for increasing the rate of recoveries of erroneous payments;
poziva k poenostavitvi sistema inšpekcijskih pregledov in zmanjšanju njihovega števila ter k pojasnitvi ustrezne odgovornosti Komisije in držav članic; poziva k uporabi postopka inšpekcijskih pregledov na eni ravni, po katerem bi države članice pregledovale projekte, Komisija pa sisteme inšpekcijskih pregledov v državah članicah;
Calls for the inspection system to be simplified and the number of inspection levels to be reduced and for the respective responsibilities of the Commission and Member States to be clarified; calls for the use of a single-level inspection procedure, under which Member States would inspect projects and the Commission would inspect the Member States' inspection systems;
meni, da je treba za izboljšanje učinkovitosti operativnih programov v večji meri uporabljati konkurenčne postopke za izbiro projektov znotraj regij;
Takes the view that, in order to improve the effectiveness of the operational programmes, greater use should be made of competitive procedures for project selection within the regions;
zaradi zmanjšanja birokracije zahteva splošno uporabo standardnih postopkov z višjimi stroški na standardno enoto in pavšali splošnih stroškov, kjer je tak sistem primeren; zahteva večje upoštevanje načela sorazmernosti, kar pomeni, da se za izvajanje manjših programov zahtevajo bistveno manjše obveznosti poročanja in preverjanja;
Calls, in the interests of reducing red tape, for more general application of standardised procedures, with higher standardised units of cost and the declaration of overheads on a flat-rate basis where this system is appropriate; calls for greater account to be taken of the principle of proportionality, i.e. for the implementation of smaller programmes to be subject to significantly reduced reporting and auditing requirements;
poziva Komisijo, naj vodi javno letno evidenco kršitev za pomanjkljivo in/ali zapoznelo spoštovanje obveznosti poročanja in objavljanja ter za nepravilnosti, zlorabe in goljufije pri uporabi strukturnih skladov; poziva, naj bodo te informacije razčlenjene po državah članicah in skladih;
Calls on the Commission to maintain an annual public ‘failure scoreboard’ of inadequate and/or late execution of reporting and disclosure requirements and of irregularities, abuse and fraud in the use of monies from the Structural Funds; calls for this information to be broken down by Member State and by fund;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker birokratske formalnosti malim podjetjem in malim organizacijam onemogočajo dostop do strukturnih sredstev; zahteva, naj bodo ustrezni predpisi in tehnična dokumentacija čim bolj jasni;
Is concerned at the fact that red tape is preventing small companies and organisations from gaining access to structural funding; calls for the relevant rules and technical documentation to be made as clear as possible;
za novo programsko obdobje zahteva postopek letnih obračunov tudi za večletne programe;
Calls for annual clearance of accounts procedures that also cover multiannual programmes to be established for the new programming period;
meni, da so za celoten sistem izvajanja in nadzora potrebne bolj učinkovite rešitve e-uprave (enotni obrazci); poziva k izmenjavi izkušenj med državami članicami, ki jo bo usklajevala Komisija, kot tudi k usklajenemu izvajanju prek skupin upravnih in nadzornih organov;
Considers more efficient e-government solutions (harmonised forms) to be necessary for the entire implementation and monitoring system; calls for exchanges of experience between the Member States coordinated by the Commission and for coordinated implementation through groupings of administrative authorities and auditing bodies;
podpira predlog Komisije, naj se nacionalnim organom izdatki povrnejo šele, ko bodo upravičencem izplačana sredstva EU; meni, da bo to pospešilo postopek izplačil in odločilno spodbudilo k strožjemu nacionalnemu nadzoru; vendar opozarja, da bi lahko na ravni držav članic ali regij nastopile težave z likvidnostjo, zato bi bilo treba uvesti ustrezno varovanje pred tveganjem;
Supports the Commission's proposal that national authorities should not receive reimbursement until the EU funding has been paid out to the beneficiaries; envisages that this will speed up payment procedures and will be a crucial incentive to carry out stringent national auditing; notes, however, that cash flow problems could potentially arise at Member State or regional level and that appropriate hedging arrangements will need to be made;