natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to pisno izjavo skupaj z imeni podpisnikov Seznam podpisnikov je objavljen v Prilogi 2 k zapisniku z dne 19. januarja 2012 ( P7_PV-PROV(2012)01-19(ANN2) ).
Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories The list of signatories is published in Annex 2 to the Minutes of 19 January 2012 ( P7_PV-PROV(2012)01-19(ANN2) ).
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. februarja 2012 o zunanji politiki EU do držav BRICS in drugih sil v vzponu: cilji in strategije ( 2011/2111(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 2 February 2012 on the EU foreign policy towards the BRICS and other emerging powers: objectives and strategies ( 2011/2111(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti točke (h), ki določa, da Unija določi in izvaja skupne politike in ukrepe ter si prizadeva za visoko stopnjo sodelovanja na vseh področjih mednarodnih odnosov, da bi tako podprla mednarodno ureditev, ki temelji na okrepljenem večstranskem sodelovanju in odgovorni svetovni politiki,
having regard to Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union, in particular its point (h), which sets forth that the Union shall define and pursue common policies and actions, and shall work for a high degree of cooperation in all fields of international relations, in order to promote an international system based on stronger multilateral cooperation and good global governance,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2010 o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) v letu 2008, predloženem Evropskemu parlamentu ob uporabi dela II, točke G, odstavka 43 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 UL C 349 E, 22.12.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2010 on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2008, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 OJ C 349 E, 22.12.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 16. septembra 2010 o odnosih EU s strateškimi partnerji,
having regard to the European Council conclusions of 16 September 2010 as regards the EU's relations with its strategic partners,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. aprila 2011 o migracijskih tokovih, ki nastajajo zaradi nestabilnosti: obseg in vloga zunanje politike EU Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0121 .
having regard to its resolution of 5 April 2011 on migration flows arising from instability: scope and role of EU foreign policy Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0121 .
ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila Svetu z dne 8. junija 2011 o 66. zasedanju Generalne skupščine Združenih narodov Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0255 .
having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 8 June 2011 on the 66th Session of the United Nations General Assembly Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0255 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. septembra 2011 o učinkoviti strategiji o surovinah za Evropo Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0364 .
having regard to its resolution of 13 September 2011 on an effective raw materials strategy for Europe Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0364 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. julija 2011 o zunanjih politikah EU v prid demokratizaciji Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0334 .
having regard to its resolution of 7 July 2011 on EU external policies in favour of democratisation Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0334 .
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o finančnem okviru 2014–2020 ( COM(2011)0500 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on the Financial Framework 2014-2020, entitled ‘A Budget for Europe 2020’ ( COM(2011)0500 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A7-0010/2012 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A7-0010/2012 ),
ker imajo zaradi svoje gospodarske rasti Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska in Južna Afrika (države BRICS) vse večji zunanjepolitični pomen;
whereas the growing political and economic relevance of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (the BRICS) entails an increased relevance of these countries in foreign policy terms;
ker bi lahko države BRICS in druga gospodarstva v vzponu pridobili veliko zunanjepolitično težo na svetovnem prizorišču, če se bo njihova gospodarska rast še naprej krepila;
whereas the BRICS and other emerging economies could become increasingly relevant in foreign policy terms on the global scene if their economic growth is further consolidated;
ker naj bi imelo sedem držav v vzponu (Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska, Indonezija, Mehika in Turčija) po napovedih leta 2050 večji obseg gospodarstev od skupnega obsega gospodarstev držav skupine G7 (ZDA, Japonska, Kanada, Združeno kraljestvo, Nemčija, Francija in Italija); ker naj bi Kitajska še pred letom 2020 postala gospodarstvo z največjim BDP; ker bi Indija lahko še pred letom 2050 postala najhitreje rastoče gospodarstvo na svetu; ker bi leta 2050 Kitajska, ZDA in Indija skupaj lahko predstavljale 50 % svetovnega gospodarstva; ker bi bila vloga EU lahko v splošnem primerljiva s katero koli od teh držav, če bo delovala kot enotna in trdna politična entiteta; ker je ta primerljiva vloga ključnega pomena za ohranjanje političnega vzvoda in za zmožnost nadaljnjega spodbujanja splošnih vrednot v neizogibnem novem večpolarnem sistemu upravljanja na svetovni ravni; ker je to treba doseči v okviru zunanjepolitičnega pristopa, ki bo usmerjen v spodbujanje partnerstva, sodelovanja in skupnega upravljanja na podlagi skupnih vrednot;
whereas seven emerging countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, Indonesia, Mexico and Turkey) are projected to have larger economies than, collectively, the G-7 countries (USA, Japan, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, France and Italy) in 2050; whereas, in terms of gross domestic product, China is projected to become the world's largest economy before 2020; whereas India could become the fastest growing economy in the world before 2050; whereas, in 2050, China, the USA and India could together represent 50% of the world's economy; whereas the EU could be of a broadly comparable scale to any of these countries if it acts as a single and robust political entity; whereas such a comparable scale is key to maintaining political leverage and being able to continue to promote universal values in the new multipolar system of global governance that is taking shape; whereas this should be done in the framework of a foreign policy approach aimed at promoting partnership, cooperation and shared governance based on common values;
ker se je z uveljavitvijo močnih gospodarskih in zunanjepolitičnih sil, kot so Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska in Južna Afrika, razvil večpolarni sistem, v katerem si vodilno vlogo v svetu vse bolj deli več držav in regionalnih skupin držav; ker v takem večpolarnem sistemu vse večjo gospodarsko moč v svetu dobivajo Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska in Južna Afrika ter druge države v vzponu, poleg tega pa utegnemo biti priča prenosu vodstva in pozitivnega vzvoda na področju zunanje politike od obstoječih sil na države v vzponu; ker je sedanja gospodarska kriza pospešila prehod na večpolarni sistem; ker je pojav novih svetovnih igralcev morda dragocena priložnost za partnerstvo med starimi in razvijajočimi se silami ter za usklajeno ukrepanje v zvezi s svetovnimi vprašanji in izzivi;
whereas, with the process of consolidation of strong economic and foreign policy powers such as the BRICS, a multi-polar system has emerged, where global leadership is increasingly shared amongst several countries and regional blocs of countries; whereas such a multi-polar system entails a progressive shift in global economic power to the BRICS and other emerging economies and may further entail a shift of leadership and positive leverage in foreign policy terms from established powers to emerging powers; whereas the current economic crisis has accelerated the transition towards a multipolar system; whereas the emergence of new global players may prove a valuable opportunity for constructive partnership between the emerged powers and the emerging ones and for concerted action on global issues and challenges;
ker bodo nadnacionalni izzivi – kot so podnebne spremembe, regulativna vprašanja na svetovni ravni, dostop do surovin in redkih zemeljskih elementov, terorizem in boj proti nedržavnim skrajnim gibanjem, trajnostni razvoj ter svetovna politična stabilnost in varnost – zahtevali na pravilih osnovan in vključujoč pristop na podlagi partnerstva, skupnih vrednot, konsenza, tesnega posvetovanja in sodelovanja z novimi silami v vzponu, če želimo najti učinkovite rešitve za nadnacionalne izzive, ki bodo zares skupne vsem; ker EU lahko in mora sprejeti pobude v zvezi s tem;
whereas transnational challenges – such as climate change, global regulatory issues, access to raw materials and rare earths, terrorism, the fight against non-State based radical movements, sustainable development, global political stability and security – will require a rule-based, inclusive approach based on partnership, common values, consensus, close consultation and cooperation with the new emerging powers, if truly shared, effective solutions to transnational challenges are to be found; whereas the EU could and should take the initiative in this respect;
ker bomo v odsotnosti vključujočega novega sistema upravljanja na svetovni ravni, ki bi temeljil na posvetovanju in sodelovanju z Brazilijo, Rusijo, Indijo, Kitajsko in Južno Afriko ter drugimi gospodarstvi v vzponu, deležni le malo spodbude za mednarodno sodelovanje in usklajeno ukrepanje v zvezi z velikimi svetovnimi izzivi, ki lahko povzročijo (i) politično in gospodarsko razdrobljenost in razvoj konkurenčnih svetovnih programov in ločenih regij, (ii) razcepitev svetovnih gospodarskih struktur in naložbenih tokov ter (iii) nastanek regionalnih vplivnih sfer, ki se bodo le malo usklajevale na mednarodni ravni, kar bo onemogočilo iskanje skupnih rešitev za nadnacionalne izzive;
whereas, without an inclusive new global governance system based on close consultation and cooperation with the BRICS and other emerging economies, there will be little incentive for international cooperation and concerted action on major global issues with the potential risk of (i) political and economic fragmentation and the emergence of competing world agendas and separate regional areas, (ii) the disentanglement of global economic structures and investment flows and (iii) the creation of regional blocs of influence with very limited international coordination and no possibility of concerted solutions to transnational challenges;
ker bo demografska razsežnost držav BRICS in drugih držav v vzponu, v primerjavi z upadanjem števila prebivalstva na Zahodu, dala tem državam večjo avtoriteto na mednarodnem prizorišču, saj bodo države BRICS in druge države v vzponu lahko zahtevale večje zastopanje velike večine svetovnega prebivalstva; ker to pomeni, da je potrebna reforma svetovnega sistema upravljanja in upravljavske strukture mednarodnih organizacij, tako da bodo bolje odražale novo gospodarsko in politično podobo ter da bodo ohranile osrednjo vlogo pri oblikovanju svetovnega konsenza in v procesih odločanja;
whereas the large demographic dimensions of the BRICS and other emerging powers, compared to the declining demographics of the West, will give more authority to such countries in international fora, as the BRICS and other emerging powers will be able to claim more representativeness of the vast majority of the world's population; whereas this entails the need to reform the global governance system and the governance structure of international organisations, so that they can become more representative of the new economic and political landscape and continue to maintain a central role in the global consensus-building and decision-making processes;
ker je zaradi sedanje gospodarske krize in proračunskih omejitev v EU in ZDA nujno potrebno združevanje sredstev z drugimi silami v vzponu, da se zagotovi usklajena in učinkovita svetovna struktura varnosti in stabilnosti ter učinkovito posredovanje na občutljivih področjih na podlagi skupnih ciljev ter usklajenih strategij in prizadevanj;
whereas, in view of the current economic crisis and the budgetary constraints of the EU and the USA, there is an urgent need to pool resources with other emerging powers in order to ensure a coherent and efficient global security and stability architecture and effective intervention in sensitive areas on the basis of common objectives and coordinated strategies and efforts;
ker lahko uspešen prehod v gospodarstvo s srednjimi prihodki v določenih okoliščinah spodbudi zmerno in v stabilnost usmerjeno zunanjo politiko; ker utrditev gospodarske in politične moči v nekaterih od držav BRICS ter drugih držav v vzponu ni nujno privedla k takšnemu prehodu;
whereas a successful transition to a middle-income economy can, under certain conditions, foster a more moderate and stability-oriented foreign policy; whereas, however, in some BRICS countries and other emerging countries the consolidation of their economic and political power has not always given rise to such a transition;
ker kljub nedavni izjemni gospodarski rasti v večini držav BRICS te ostajajo države z največjo koncentracijo revščine na svetu; ker to kaže, da utegne hitra gospodarska rast brez politik rasti, prilagojenih revnim, in vzpostavljanja varnostnih mrež v veliki večini primerov povečati neenakost;
whereas, in spite of the recent spectacular economic growth in most of the BRICS countries, these same countries are also the ones with the single largest concentration of poverty in the world; whereas this shows that, in the great majority of cases, without pro-poor growth and creation of safety nets, rapid economic growth may entail an increase in inequalities;
ker države BRICS in ostala gospodarstva v vzponu ne sestavljajo ali vključujejo formalnega združenja držav, ki bi imelo specifično vlogo v mednarodnih zadevah in bi Evropska unija zato morala razviti odnose z vsako izmed teh držav, pri čemer mora upoštevati njihovo edinstvenost ter posebne zunanjepolitične cilje; ker bi morala Evropska unija vlagati v strateška partnerstva z državami BRICS in drugimi gospodarstvi v vzponu, saj imajo vse opaznejšo vlogo na mednarodnem prizorišču, tj. v mednarodnih organizacijah, kot so Združeni narodi, pri doseganju skupnih ciljev, kot so mir in svetovna varnost, notranja ali mednarodna vladavina prava, spodbujanje človekovih pravic, demokracija, trajnostni razvoj in svetovna finančna regulacija;
whereas the BRICS and current emerging economies do not constitute or comprise a formal grouping of countries designed to play a specific role in international affairs and whereas the EU should therefore develop a relationship with each one of those countries, taking note of their singularity and specific foreign policy objectives and aims; whereas the EU should invest in strategic partnerships with each BRICS country and other emerging economies, as they increasingly play a role in the international arena, particularly in international organisations, such as the UN, as a means of advancing common goals, namely peace and global security, the rule of law domestically or internationally, the promotion of human rights, democracy, sustainable development and global financial regulation;
ker države BRICS in druga gospodarstva v vzponu potrebujejo stabilen zunanjepolitični okvir ter stabilno zakonodajno okolje in javno politiko, ki bodo ohranili interes za njihova gospodarstva in družbe ter naložbe vanje; ker morajo države BRICS in druga gospodarstva v vzponu vlagati v utrjevanje demokratične, politične, gospodarske in socialne stabilnosti, pri tem pa potrebujejo podporo;
whereas the BRICS and other emerging economies require a stable foreign policy setting and a stable regulatory and public policy environment, which can sustain interest and investment in their economies and societies; whereas the BRICS and other emerging economies need to invest and be supported in the consolidation of democratic, political, economic and social stability;
ker mora EU pri svetovnem prenosu moči odigrati pomembno vlogo spodbujevalca partnerstva in vključujočega upravljanja, ukrepati pa mora hitro, če želi ohraniti svoj vzvod (ali pa bi bila lahko strateško odrinjena na stranski tir); ker bo to zahtevalo strateške spremembe, tako znotraj EU kot tudi glede na njeno zunanjo politiko, med drugim uvedbo večje usklajenosti politik;
whereas the EU must play a major role in the global power transition as a promoter of partnership and inclusive governance, but needs to act fast if it wishes to maintain its leverage (or it could be strategically sidelined); whereas this will entail strategic changes both inside the EU and with regard to its foreign policy, inter alia the introduction of greater policy coherence;
ker so voditelji Brazilije, Rusije, Indije, Kitajske in Južne Afrike ob zaključku tretjega srečanja voditeljev držav BRICS 14. aprila 2011 izdali skupno deklaracijo, v kateri so zahtevali več mednarodnega sodelovanja in krepitev upravljanja na svetovni ravni ter izrazili podporo večstranski diplomaciji z Združenimi narodi in skupino G-20; ker je leta 2011 vseh pet držav BRICS hkrati prisotnih v Varnostnem svetu ZN; ker države BRICS pozivajo k spremembi upravnih struktur mednarodnih finančnih institucij in Združenih narodov, tako da bodo odražale spremembe v svetovnem gospodarstvu in bodo bolje obvladovale aktualne svetovne izzive;
whereas, at the end of their third meeting on 14 April 2011, the BRICS leaders issued a joint declaration calling for more international cooperation and a strengthening of global governance, and expressing support for multilateral diplomacy with the United Nations and the G-20; whereas all five BRICS countries have been concurrently present in the UN Security Council during 2011; whereas the BRICS have called for change in the governing structures of the international financial institutions and the UN to reflect the changes in the world economy and to better manage today's global challenges;
ker so med državami BRICS znatne razlike v političnih in gospodarskih sistemih, demografskih in družbenih trendih ter v zunanjih politikah;
whereas the BRICS display considerable divergences in their political and economic systems, demographic and social trends, and foreign policy outlooks;
ker je v sklepih Evropskega sveta z dne 16. septembra 2010 poudarjeno, da bi v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo in evropsko varnostno strategijo morale EU in njene države članice ukrepati bolj strateško, da bi resnični vpliv Evrope imel mednarodno veljavo, ter da strateška partnerstva s ključnimi svetovnimi igralci predstavljajo koristen instrument za uveljavljanje evropskih ciljev in interesov;
whereas the European Council conclusions of 16 September 2010 stressed that, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty and in line with the European Security Strategy, the EU and its Member States would act more strategically so as to bring Europe's true weight to bear internationally and that the EU's strategic partnerships with key players in the world provide a useful instrument for pursuing European objectives and interests;
ker obstoječi trgovinski sporazumi med EU in državami BRICS niso obojestransko koristni le v gospodarskem smislu, temveč obema stranema prinašajo tudi politične koristi;
whereas current trade agreements between the EU and the BRICS countries are not only mutually beneficial in economic terms but also politically beneficial to both sides;
ker bi morala EU igrati proaktivno vlogo pri gradnji vključujočega, reprezentativnega in na partnerstvu temelječega sistema Združenih narodov, ki bi lahko učinkovito prispeval k svetovnemu redu in rešitvam, miru in varnosti, demokraciji ter mednarodnemu redu, ki bi temeljil na vladavini prava; ker je EU po členu 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) uradno zavezana uspešni večstranskosti, katere jedro so močni Združeni narodi;
whereas the EU should play a proactive part in building an inclusive and representative United Nations system based on partnership, that can effectively contribute to global governance and solutions, peace and security, democracy, human rights and a rule-of-law-based international order; whereas, in accordance with Article 21 of the TEU, the EU is formally committed to effective multilateralism with a strong UN at its core;
ker je z leti Evropska unija z državami BRICS razvila dvostranska partnerstva na podlagi skupnih vrednot in interesov, katerih namen je izboljšati odnose in okrepiti sodelovanje na vseh ravneh; ker se je pogosto izkazalo, da ta strateška partnerstva ne zadostujejo, zlasti kar zadeva spodbujanje demokracije, krepitev pravne države in oblikovanje skupnega pristopa k reševanju sporov;
whereas over the years the EU has developed with BRICS bilateral strategic partnerships based on shared values and interests aimed at upgrading the relations and enhancing cooperation at all level; whereas these strategic partnerships have often proved to be inadequate with regard, in particular, to promoting democracy, strengthening the rule of law and defining a common approach to the resolution of conflicts;
ker je treba nujno poiskati načine za okrepitev sodelovanja v okviru Združenih narodov in v okviru skupin vodilnih držav (G-7, G-20) ter izboljšati usklajevanje njihovega dela;
whereas there is an urgent need to seek ways of strengthening cooperation within the United Nations system and within the groups of leading countries (G-7, G-20) and improving the way their work is coordinated;
ker je skupina G-20, katere države članice predstavljajo 88 % svetovnega BDP in 65 % svetovnega prebivalstva, postala pomemben forum za sodelovanje na svetovni ravni, vendar pa je treba rešiti vprašanje njene reprezentativnosti in določiti njeno natančno vlogo v arhitekturi večstranskih odnosov;
whereas the Group of 20 (G-20), whose member countries account for 88 % of global GDP and 65 % of the world's population, has become an important forum for cooperation at global level, but the problem of its representativeness needs to be resolved and its precise role in the multilateral architecture determined;