natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti členov 21, 42, 45 in 46, ter Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in protokola št. 10 k tej Pogodbi,
having regard to Title V of the Treaty on European Union, and in particular to Articles 21, 42, 45 and 46, as well as to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Protocol No 10 thereto,
ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije z naslovom „Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu“, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 12. decembra 2003, in poročila o njenem izvajanju z naslovom „Zagotavljanje varnosti v spreminjajočem se svetu“, ki je bilo pripravljeno pod vodstvom visoke predstavnice EU in ga je Evropski svet sprejel 11. in 12. decembra 2008,
having regard to the European Security Strategy (ESS) entitled ‘A secure Europe in a better world’, adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003, as well as to the report on its implementation entitled ‘Providing security in a changing world’, drafted under the responsibilities of the EU High Representative and endorsed by the European Council on 11-12 December 2008,
ob upoštevanju ciljev, ki jih je decembra 2008 določil Evropski svet za povečanje evropskih vojaških zmogljivosti,
having regard to the objectives set by the European Council in December 2008 in order to enhance European military capabilities,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 1. decembra 2011, 23. maja 2011, 31. januarja 2011 in 9. decembra 2010 o skupni varnostni in obrambni politiki (SZVP), o združevanju in skupnem izkoriščanju vojaških zmogljivosti, o SVOP oziroma o razvoju vojaških zmogljivosti,
having regard to the Council conclusions of 1 December 2011, 23 May 2011, 31 January 2011 and 9 December 2010, on the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), on pooling and sharing of military capabilities, on the CSDP, and on military capability development respectively,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2011/411/SZVP z dne 12. julija o določitvi statuta, sedeža in načina delovanja Evropske obrambne agencije ter o razveljavitvi Skupnega ukrepa 2004/551/SZVP UL L 183, 13.7.2011, str.
having regard to Council Decision 2011/411/CFSP of 12 July 2011 defining the statute, seat and operational rules of the European Defence Agency and repealing Joint Action 2004/551/CFSP OJ L 183, 13.7.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila visoke predstavnice o skupni varnostni in obrambni politiki, ki je bilo predstavljeno med zasedanjem Sveta za zunanje zadeve 18. julija 2011,
having regard to the High Representative's Report on CSDP, presented during the Foreign Affairs Council of 18 July 2011,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/43/ES Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. maja 2009 o poenostavitvi pogojev za prenos obrambnih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti UL L 146, 10.6.2009, str.
having regard to Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community OJ L 146, 10.6.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2009/81/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. julija 2009 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo nekaterih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev, ki jih oddajo naročniki na področju obrambe in varnosti, ter spremembi direktiv 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES UL L 216, 20.8.2009, str.
having regard to Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts and service contracts by contracting authorities or entities in the fields of defence and security, and amending Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC OJ L 216, 20.8.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 11. maja 2011 o razvoju skupne varnostne in obrambne politike po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0228 .
having regard to its resolutions of 11 May 2011 on the development of the common security and defence policy following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0228 .
, o civilno-vojaškem sodelovanju in razvoju vojaških zmogljivosti z dne 23. novembra 2010 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0419 .
, of 23 November 2010 on civilian-military cooperation and the development of civilian-military capabilities Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0419 .
in o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije ter skupne varnostne in obrambne politike z dne 10. marca 2010 UL C 349 E, 22.12.2010, str.
, and of 10 March 2010 on the implementation of the European Security Strategy and the Common Security and Defence Policy OJ C 349 E, 22.12.2010, p.
in prejšnjih resolucij o evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki,
, as well as to its previous resolutions on European Security and Defence Policy,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0428/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0428/2011 ),
je zaskrbljen nad tem, da se obrambni proračuni v večini držav članic EU zaradi finančne, gospodarske in dolžniške krize zadnja leta vedno bolj zmanjšujejo in da bi ti ukrepi utegnili negativno vplivati na njihove vojaške zmogljivosti ter s tem tudi na sposobnost EU za učinkovit prevzem odgovornosti na področju ohranjanja miru, preprečevanja sporov in krepitve mednarodne varnosti v skladu z načeli Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov, če državam članicam ne bi uspelo teh izgub nadomestiti s povečanim evropskim sodelovanjem in usklajevanjem; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je obramba skupno dobro, ki vpliva na varnost vseh evropskih državljanov, in da morajo vse države članice prispevati v duhu sodelovanja, delitve bremena in stroškovne učinkovitosti;
Notes with concern the culmination of a trend in recent years of cuts in the defence budgets of the majority of EU Member States in the wake of the financial, economic and debt crisis, and the potential negative impact of these measures on their military capabilities and, therefore, on the ability of the EU to effectively take over its responsibilities in peace keeping, conflict prevention and the strengthening of international security, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, should the Member States fail to make up for these losses through increased European cooperation and coordination; underlines, in this regard, that defence constitutes a public good that affects the security of all European citizens and that all Member States need to contribute in a spirit of cooperation, burden sharing and cost-effectiveness;
opozarja, da bi neusklajeno zmanjševanje obrambnih proračunov lahko pripeljalo do popolne izgube nekaterih vojaških zmogljivosti v Evropi; zato pozdravlja in podpira Svet pri spodbujanju držav članic k ustrezni izmenjavi informacij in povečevanju preglednosti v zvezi s sedanjimi in prihodnjimi zmanjšanji obrambnih proračunov ter poziva k izvedbi ocene učinka teh zmanjšanj proračuna za razvoj zmogljivosti v podporo skupni varnostni in obrambni politiki; opozarja, da je posredovanje v Libiji jasno pokazalo, da celo koalicija evropskih držav ni sposobna izpeljati operacije te vrste brez podpore ZDA;
Warns that uncoordinated defence budget cuts could result in the complete loss of certain military capabilities in Europe; welcomes and supports, therefore, the Council's encouragement to the Member States to exchange information, as appropriate, and enhance transparency on current and forthcoming defence budget cuts, and calls for an impact assessment of these budget cuts for the development of capabilities in support of CSDP; recalls that the intervention in Libya clearly demonstrated that even a coalition of European countries is unable to carry out an operation of this kind without US support;
opaža nepretrgano nesorazmerno naslanjanje na ZDA v obrambnih zadevah, ki ga prikazuje dejstvo, da se je delež obrambnih izdatkov ZDA v Severnoatlantskem zavezništvu povzpel na 75 %, in ugotavlja, da morajo evropske zaveznice prevzeti večji delež obrambnega bremena; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da so nedavna zmanjšanja proračuna del vzorca držav članic, ki že več kot desetletje premalo vlagajo in nezadostno uporabljajo sredstva na področju varnosti in obrambe;
Notes the continuing disproportionate reliance on the United States in defence matters, given that the US share of all defence spending in the North Atlantic Alliance has risen to 75 %, and the need therefore for European allies to increase their share of the defence burden; notes with concern that recent budget cuts are in addition to a pattern of Member States under-investing and under-spending in the fields of security and defence for over a decade;
v vedno bolj zapletenem in nepredvidljivem varnostnem okolju poziva vse države članice EU, naj tesneje sodelujejo in usklajujejo ukrepe proti skupnim grožnjam, opredeljenim v evropski varnostni strategiji, ter v celoti sprejmejo svoj del odgovornosti za mir in varnost v Evropi, njeni soseščini in širšem svetu; ob spoznanju, da vse grožnje niso vojaškega značaja in da ima EU na voljo vrsto instrumentov za preprečevanje in upravljanje kriz, kot so civilne zmogljivosti in tehnična pomoč, države članice opozarja na večkrat izrečene zaveze, med drugim tudi v Pogodbi in sklepih Evropskega sveta, o izboljšavi svojih vojaških zmogljivosti in jih poziva, naj te zaveze uresničijo;
In an increasingly complex and unpredictable security environment, urges all EU Member States to cooperate more closely and coordinate actions against the common threats identified in the European Security Strategy (ESS), assuming fully their part of responsibility for peace and security in Europe, its neighbourhood and the wider world; while recognising that not all threats are of a military nature and that the EU has a variety of instruments at its disposal for crisis prevention and management, such as its civilian capabilities and technical assistance instruments, reminds the Member States of their repeated commitments, including in the Treaty and European Council conclusions, to improve their military capabilities, and calls on them to make sure these commitments are met;
ponavlja stališče, da bodo okrepljene zmogljivosti evropske obrambe povečale strateško avtonomnost EU in bistveno prispevala h kolektivni varnosti v okviru Nata in drugih partnerstev; poudarja potencial določb Lizbonske pogodbe, povezane s tem, in poziva države članice, naj vzpostavijo stalno strukturno sodelovanje, opredelijo pogoje za uporabo klavzul o solidarnosti in vzajemni obrambi in v celoti izkoristijo Evropsko obrambo agencijo;
Reiterates its view that a reinforced European defence capability will enhance the strategic autonomy of the EU and provide an important contribution to collective security in the context of NATO and other partnerships; emphasises the potential of the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty in this respect and urges the Member States to implement permanent structured cooperation, to define the conditions for the application of the solidarity and mutual defence clauses, and to make full use of the European Defence Agency;
ob zavedanju, da obstajajo ambicije na različnih ravneh, poudarja, da države članice skupaj letno za obrambo potrošijo približno 200 milijard EUR, kar ustreza le kaki tretjini obrambnega proračuna ZDA, vendar je še vedno znaten znesek, ki kaže, kakšni so stroški neprisotnosti Evrope na področju obrambe;
Without disregarding different level of ambition, points out that the Member States collectively spend about EUR 200 billion a year on defence, which is only about a third of the US defence budget but still a considerable amount demonstrating the costs of non-Europe in the defence area;
obžaluje način, na katerega se porabi večina teh sredstev, saj se odločitve o nacionalnih obrambnih načrtih sprejemajo neusklajeno, kar ne povzroča samo stalnih vrzeli v zmogljivostih, ampak pogosto tudi odvečne presežne zmogljivosti in podvojevanje ter razdrobljeno industrijo in trge, zaradi česar EU nima ne prepoznavnosti ne virov in tudi ne dometa, ki bi ustrezali porabi 200 milijard evrov;
Deplores the way in which most of these funds are spent, based on uncoordinated national defence planning decisions, which results not only in persistent capability gaps, but often also in wasteful overcapacities and duplications, as well as fragmented industry and markets, which leads to the EU not having either the visibility, resources or reach of EUR 200 billions' worth of spending;
meni, da je mogoče gospodarsko in finančno krizo obravnavati kot priložnost za povezovanje obrambnih politik EU, saj lahko spodbudi oblikovanje in izvajanje ambicioznih reform, ki so že dolgo v fazi nastajanja;
Considers that the economic and financial crisis can be used as an opportunity for the integration of EU defence policies, as it can provide the impetus for finally creating and implementing ambitious reforms long in the making;
glede na to poziva države članice k zavedanju, da je tesnejše sodelovanje najboljši način delovanja v prihodnje in da lahko države članice svoje zmogljivosti razvijajo stroškovno učinkovito in brez negativnih posledic za suverenost le z (A) boljšim usklajevanjem obrambnega načrtovanja, ki bo zajemalo tudi usklajevanje vojaških potreb in ukrepe za povečanje interoperabilnosti, (B) združevanjem in skupnim izkoriščanjem nekaterih zmogljivosti in podpornih struktur, (C) tesnejšim sodelovanjem na področju raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja, (D) podpiranjem sodelovanja med industrijami in konsolidacije in (E) optimizacijo nabave in odpravo tržnih ovir;
Given the above, urges the Member States to accept that increased cooperation is the best way forward and that, in particular through (A) better coordination of defence planning, which includes harmonisation of military requirements and measures to increase interoperability, (B) pooling and sharing of certain capabilities and support structures, (C) enhanced cooperation in research and technological development, (D) facilitating industrial collaboration and consolidation, and (E) optimisation of procurement and removing market barriers, the Member States can develop capabilities in a more cost-efficient way, and this without adverse effects on their sovereignty;
poudarja, da ima EU na voljo orodja in mehanizme, ki državam članicam lahko pri tem pomagajo, kakor nakazuje spodnje besedilo, med drugim tudi z opredelitvijo področij, na katerih bi lahko na evropski ravni zagotovili več denarja (F);
Stresses that the EU has at its disposal tools and mechanisms that can assist the Member States in achieving this, as set out below, including through the identification of areas where more funding could be provided at European level (F);
priznava, da sta, ne glede na zgoraj navedeno, vzdrževanje ustrezne proizvodne in tehnološke osnove ter zagotavljanje zanesljivosti oskrbe temeljni vprašanji nacionalne obrambe, ki ju ne smejo usmerjati le finančni cilji;
Recognises that, regardless of the above, maintaining an adequate manufacturing and technological base and ensuring security of supply are fundamental national defence matters which should not be governed solely by financial objectives;
meni, da mora biti glavno torišče vseh prizadevanj EU na področju obrambe za odziv na finančno krizo Evropska obrambna agencija, ki bi lahko pokrila široko področje prenove in načrtovanja politike, vendar njena sedanja oblika to onemogoča; poziva k posodobitvi oblike Evropske obrambne agencije, glede na to, da bi bilo povečanje njenega proračuna, števila osebja, področij pristojnosti in splošnih pooblastil stroškovno učinkovito v dolgoročnem smislu, saj bi lahko tako agencija učinkoviteje optimizirala obrambni sektor EU ter si posebej prizadevala za preprečevanje dragih podvajanj in finančno nevzdržnih obrambnih politik;
Considers that a major focus of all EU efforts on defence in reaction to the financial crisis should be the European Defence Agency (EDA), which has the potential to cover a wide area of policy overhauls and planning, yet is unable to do so in its current format; calls for an upgrade of the format of the EDA, considering that an increase in its budget, personnel, areas of responsibility and overall powers would be cost-effective in the long run, enabling it to work better on the optimisation of the EU defence sector, with a specific task of avoiding costly duplications and financially unsustainable defence policies;
Boljše usklajevanje obrambnega načrtovanja
Better coordination of defence planning
ponovno poziva države članice, naj opravijo sistematičen varnostni in obrambni pregled v skladu s skupnimi merili in usklajenim časovnim načrtom; predlaga, da bi to lahko postalo redna praksa, povezana s proračunskimi postopki, neke vrste „evropski semester“ varnostnih in obrambnih pregledov;
Reiterates its call on the Member States to conduct systematic security and defence reviews in accordance with common criteria and a harmonised timetable; suggests that this could be developed into a regular exercise which is linked to budgetary procedures – a sort of ‘European semester’ of security and defence reviews;
poudarja, da bi bilo bistvo teh usklajenih pregledov odpraviti kulturo izolacije nacionalnega obrambnega načrtovanja in ustanoviti platformo za strukturirano razpravo, ki bi državam članicam omogočala, da bi pred sprejemanjem ključnih strateških odločitev o obrambnih zmogljivostih pridobile širšo sliko in evropsko perspektivo; poudarja, da mora pobuda dopolnjevati usklajevanje zadevnih držav članic v okviru procesa obrambnega načrtovanja Nata;
Stresses that the point of such coordinated reviews would be to end the culture of isolation in national defence planning and to establish a platform for structured discussion, allowing the Member States to consider the bigger picture – the European perspective – before they take key strategic decisions on their defence capabilities; underlines that the initiative should complement, for the Member States concerned, their coordination within the NATO Defence Planning Process;
ponovno poudarja, da je treba sprejeti belo knjigo EU o varnosti in obrambi, ki bi opredelila in uresničila evropsko varnostno strategijo, natančneje opredelila varnostne in obrambne cilje, interese in potrebe Unije glede na razpoložljiva sredstva in vire ter pri tem upoštevala tudi netradicionalne vidike varnosti; poudarja, da bi morali ta dokument napisati in redno posodabljati na osnovi nacionalnih pregledov, obenem pa bi moral predstavljati referenco zanje in povezati nacionalno obrambno načrtovanje s skupnimi obeti glede varnosti in oceno ogroženosti; poudarja, da bo taka bela knjiga z oblikovanjem skupne vizije v zvezi z izzivi in rešitvami vzpostavila zaupanje in zagotovila ciljno naravnane strateške smernice o obliki, ki bi jo morale imeti sile EU;
Calls again for an EU White Paper on security and defence that would develop and implement the European Security Strategy, better defining the EU's security and defence objectives, interests and needs in relation to the means and resources available, while also taking into account non-traditional aspects of security; emphasises that it should be drafted and regularly updated on the basis of the national reviews, while at the same time providing a reference for them, linking national defence planning with a common security outlook and threat assessment; stresses that such a White Paper, by setting out a common vision of challenges and solutions, will build trust and provide focused strategic guidance on the form that EU forces should take;
opozarja, da je Lizbonska pogodba okrepila vlogo Evropske obrambne agencije (EDA) pri podpiranju prizadevanj držav članic za izboljšanje vojaških zmogljivosti skupne varnostne in obrambne politike; zato predlaga, da se države članice obrnejo na Evropsko obrambno agencijo glede tega, kako izboljšati usklajevanje obrambnega načrtovanja v Evropi; nadalje opozarja, da je po Pogodbi ta agencija zadolžena za ocenjevanje, koliko se upoštevajo zaveze glede zmogljivosti, in za spodbujanje usklajevanja operativnih potreb, ter poziva k boljšemu izpolnjevanju teh nalog; predlaga, da bi države članice kot prvi korak evropskega semestra osnutke svojih varnostnih in obrambnih pregledov lahko predložile agenciji in prosile za njen nasvet in oceno, zlasti v luči prednostnih nalog glede zmogljivosti, ki jih je določil usmerjevalni odbor Evropske obrambne agencije v načrtu za razvoj zmogljivosti in načrtov drugih držav članic ter procesa obrambnega načrtovanja Nata; meni, da bi morala agencija zelo kmalu imeti pomembno vlogo pri določanju evropske politike glede zmogljivosti in oborožitve;
Recalls that the Lisbon Treaty has reinforced the role of the European Defence Agency (EDA) in supporting the Member States in their efforts to improve the military capabilities for the Common Security and Defence Policy; suggests, therefore, that the Member States ask the Agency to examine how to improve coordination of defence planning in Europe; recalls, furthermore, that the Treaty tasks the EDA to evaluate the observance of capability commitments and to promote the harmonisation of operational needs, and calls for better execution of these tasks; recommends that, as a first step in the ‘European semester’ exercise, the Member States could submit their draft national security and defence reviews to the EDA for advice, to assess them in particular in the light of the capability priorities set by the EDA steering board in the Capability Development Plan, as well as of the plans of the other Member States and of the NATO Defence Planning Process; believes that, in the very short term, the EDA should also play an important role in defining a European capabilities and armaments policy;
je mnenja, da bi morale države članice kot naslednji korak organizirati skupna posvetovanja, da bi uskladile svoje vojaške potrebe in preučile vse možnosti za večjo stroškovno učinkovitost s pomočjo dogovorov na ravni EU ter regijskih, dvostranskih in drugih dogovorov;
Takes the view that, as the next step, the Member States should go through a process of mutual consultations in order to harmonise their military requirements and examine all options for increasing cost-efficiency through EU-level, regional, bilateral or other arrangements;
poleg tega države članice poziva, naj v tem procesu odprejo vprašanje obstoječih presežnih zmogljivosti, zlasti glede opreme in osebja, ki je za operacije manjšega pomena;
Urges the Member States also to address within such a process the existing overcapacities, especially as regards equipment and personnel of lesser priority in operations;
Združevanje in skupno izkoriščanje zmogljivosti
Pooling and sharing of capabilities