natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je alternativno reševanje sporov mehanizem zunajsodnega reševanja, ki potrošniku in trgovcu pomaga rešiti spor preko posredovanja tretje strani (mediator, arbiter);
whereas ADR is a mechanism for reaching out-of-court settlements by helping consumers and traders to resolve conflicts through the intervention of a third party (mediator or arbitrator),
ker imajo v številnih državah javni organi – vključno z varuhi človekovih pravic in regulativnimi organi – pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju reševanja sporov;
whereas in many countries the public authorities – including ombudsmen and regulatory authorities – play an important role in encouraging the resolution of disputes,
ker lahko večje zaupanje državljanov v notranji trg in zaupanje v uveljavljanje pravic v čezmejnih sporih dodatno spodbudi gospodarstvo EU;
whereas by strengthening citizens' confidence in the internal market, trust in the enforcement of rights in cross-border disputes can make a contribution towards stimulating the EU economy,
ker državljani EU slabo poznajo in razumejo sisteme alternativnega reševanja sporov po Evropi ter samo majhen delež državljanov ve, kako vložiti zahtevek pri organu za alternativno reševanje sporov;
whereas the EU citizen's knowledge and understanding of ADR schemes throughout Europe is low and confused, with only a small percentage of citizens knowing how to file a claim with an ADR body,
ker je pomembno, da se zagotovi boljše seznanjanje z obstojem alternativnega reševanja sporov in da se naredi več za spodbujanje potrošnikov in strokovnjakov k uporabi takega reševanja kot alternative za sodne postopke, ki omogoča izognitev soočenju in ponuja možnost rešitve, ugodne za vse udeležene;
whereas it is important to assure better publicising of the existence of ADR mechanisms and to do more to encourage consumers and professionals to use them as an alternative to court proceedings, in order to make it possible to avoid a confrontational approach and offer the prospect of a win-win situation,
ker si je treba prizadevati za uravnotežen pristop, ki bo upošteval tako prožnost sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov kot potrebo po zagotavljanju varstva potrošnikov in pravičnih postopkov;
whereas a balanced approach has to be sought which takes into consideration both the flexibility of ADR systems on the one hand and the need to ensure consumer protection and fair procedures on the other,
ker se je Parlament že večkrat zavzel za nadaljnja prizadevanja pri razvoju alternativnega reševanja sporov; ker je v svoji resoluciji z dne 6. aprila 2011 o upravljanju in partnerstvu na enotnem trgu pozval Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2011 predloži zakonodajni predlog o uporabi alternativnih načinov reševanja sporov v EU;
whereas Parliament has repeatedly called for further efforts to develop ADR; whereas it has called on the Commission in its resolution of 6 April 2011 on governance and partnership in the single market to submit a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute resolution in the EU by the end of 2011,
ker je Komisija vključila v svoj delovni program za leto 2011 zakonodajni predlog o alternativnem reševanju sporov kot strateško pobudo, v svoje sporočilo z dne 13. aprila 2011 z naslovom „Akt za enotni trg“ pa kot eno od dvanajstih pobud za okrepitev rasti in zaupanja s ciljem krepitve moči potrošnika;
whereas the Commission has included a legislative proposal on ADR, in its Work Programme 2011 as a strategic initiative and in its communication of 13 April 2011 on a ‘Single Market Act’, as one of the twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence, with the aim of consumer empowerment,
ker se je rok za izvedbo Direktive 2008/52/ES iztekel 21. maja 2011;
whereas the deadline for the implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC expired on 21 May 2011,
pozdravlja nedavno posvetovanje Komisije o alternativnem reševanju sporov, ki se je kljub zelo široko zastavljenemu naslovu izključno osredotočilo na transakcije potrošnikov;
Welcomes the recent Commission consultation on ADR which, despite its wide-ranging title, is exclusively targeted at consumer transactions;
vseeno meni, da alternativno reševanje sporov tvori del splošnega načrta „pravičnosti za rast“ po različnih sektorjih; meni, da bi bilo treba pri vsakem pristopu k alternativnemu reševanju sporov preseči zgolj potrošniške spore in vanj vključiti civilne in gospodarske transakcije med podjetji, ne glede na to, ali potekajo med zasebnimi ali javnimi podjetji, družinske spore, dejanja zoper čast in dobro ime ter druge spore splošnega interesa ali med strankami z različnim pravnim statusom;
Believes, however, that ADR forms part of a general ‘justice-for-growth’ agenda across sectors; takes the view that any approach to ADR should go beyond consumer disputes so as to include business-to-business (B2B) civil and commercial transactions, irrespective of whether they are carried out between private or public undertakings, family disputes, defamation cases and other general interest disputes or ones involving parties with different legal statuses;
pozdravlja, da so bili z Direktivo 2008/52/ES usklajeni nekateri standardi mediacije; poudarja, da je treba na vseh področjih alternativnega reševanja sporov opredeliti splošne pogoje in ohranjati postopkovna jamstva; meni, da bi bilo treba pregledati priporočila Komisije in kodeks ravnanja iz let 1998 in 2001;
Welcomes the fact that Directive 2008/52/EC has harmonised some standards for mediation; emphasises that common terms need to be defined and procedural guarantees maintained in all areas of ADR; feels the need to revisit the 1998 and 2001 Commission recommendations and the Code of Conduct;
meni, da je samoregulacija sicer še naprej pomembna, vseeno pa je potrebno zakonodajno ukrepanje, ki bo določilo minimalne standarde, na katerih lahko temeljijo sheme alternativnega reševanja sporov, da se alternativnemu reševanju sporov zagotovi okvir v pravnemu redu držav članic, kot to kaže primer Direktive 2008/52/ES; poudarja, da je pri vsakem tovrstnem okviru potrebna previdnost, da se ne omeji raznolikosti na področju alternativnega reševanja sporov, saj ni rešitve, ki bi bila primerna za vse in bi lahko odpravila raznovrstne težave, ki se pojavljajo na različnih pravnih področjih;
Considers that, whilst self-regulation remains important, legislative action setting out minimum standards upon which ADR schemes may be based is necessary in order to provide a framework for ADR within Member States' legal orders, as shown by the example of Directive 2008/52/EC; stresses that any such framework should be careful not to limit diversity in the field of ADR as there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution that could tackle the variety of problems that arise in different legal sectors;
poudarja, da je treba bolje razumeti številne različne vrste mehanizmov in postopkov (vključno z dejavnostmi javnih organov, na primer varuha človekovih pravic), ki jih pogosto skupno imenujemo alternativno reševanje sporov; meni, da se struktura in zasnova alternativnega reševanja sporov med državami članicami precej razlikuje, čeprav obstaja precej podobnosti med tehnikami pogajanj in lajšanja sporov, ki so pogosto del sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov;
Emphasises the need for better understanding of the many different types of mechanisms and processes (including the activities of public authorities such as ombudsmen) that are often collectively referred to as ADR; considers that while there is considerable commonality among the techniques of negotiation and dispute facilitation that are commonly to be found in ADR systems, nevertheless the structure and architecture of ADR differs considerably between Member States;
meni, da bodo zakonodajni ukrepi, sprejeti na ravni Evropske unije, uporabo alternativnega reševanja sporov olajšali, fizične in pravne osebe pa spodbudili k njegovi pogostejši uporabi, zlasti pri čezmejnih sporih, saj so za reševanje teh vrst sporov sodni postopki zapletenejši, dražji in dolgotrajnejši;
Considers that legislative measures adopted at EU level will facilitate the implementation of ADR and encourage natural and legal persons to use it more often, especially in relation to cross-border disputes, bearing in mind that judicial procedures for resolving such disputes are more complex, expensive and lengthy;
v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2011 predloži zakonodajni predlog o uporabi alternativnega reševanja potrošniških sporov v Uniji, in poudarja, da je treba ta predlog hitro sprejeti;
In this context, calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute resolution for consumer matters in the EU by the end of 2011 and emphasises the importance of its swift adoption;
meni, da bi standardi za alternativno reševanje sporov morali vključevati: spoštovanje alternativnega reševanja sporov/sporazum o njem; neodvisnost, preglednost, učinkovitost, pravičnost, nepristranskost in zaupnost; posledice za prekluzivne in zastaralne roke; izvršljivost doseženih dogovorov po alternativnem reševanju sporov; kvalifikacijo tretjih strank;
Believes that ADR standards should include: adherence to/agreement on ADR; independence, transparency, effectiveness, fairness, impartiality and confidentiality; effects on limitation and prescription; enforceability of agreements resulting from ADR; qualification of third parties;
meni, da bi morali organe alternativnega reševanja sporov spremljati in redno ocenjevati neodvisni ocenjevalci;
Takes the view that ADR bodies should be monitored and assessed regularly by independent evaluators;
da ne bi bil dostop do sodnega varstva kakorkoli omejen, zavrača vsako posplošeno vsiljevanje alternativnega reševanja sporov na ravni EU, predlaga pa, da bi se preučilo obvezen sistem, po katerem se stranke napoti, da pretehtajo možnosti alternativnega reševanja sporov;
In order not to prejudice access to justice, rejects any wholesale imposition of a mandatory system of ADR at EU level, but suggests that a mandatory system of referral of the parties to consider possibilities of ADR could be examined;
je seznanjen s primerom italijanske „skupne sprave“ kot morebitnega modela najboljše prakse, ki temelji na protokolu, o katerem se dogovorijo in ga podpišejo podjetje in združenja potrošnikov ter od podjetja zahteva, da vnaprej privoli v alternativno reševanje sporov, nastalih na področju, na katerega se nanaša protokol;
Notes the example of Italian ‘joint conciliation’ as a possible best practice model based on a protocol agreed and signed by the company and the consumer associations requiring the company to agree in advance to ADR in order to resolve any disputes which arise in the area covered by the protocol;
poudarja, da ne bi smela nobena klavzula o alternativnem reševanju sporov vplivati na dostop do sodnega varstva, zlasti za šibkejše stranke, ki so v določenih okoliščinah lahko tudi mala ali srednja podjetja, ter zato meni, da so odločitve v okviru alternativnega reševanja sporov lahko zavezujoče le, če se vse vpletene strani izrecno tako dogovorijo;
Stresses that any ADR clause should not hamper access to justice, in particular on the part of the weaker party, which, in certain circumstances, may also be an SME, and therefore considers, to this extent, that ADR decisions may be binding only with the explicit agreement of the parties involved;
meni, da bi moralo za alternativno reševanje sporov na splošno veljati obvezno razkritje okoliščin, ki vplivajo na neodvisnost tretje stranke ali ki vodijo v konflikt interesov, ter obvezno enako ravnanje z vsemi strankami, kot to določa kodeks ravnanja;
Takes the view that an obligation to disclose circumstances that affect the third party's independence or that give rise to a conflict of interests and a duty to serve all parties equally, as laid down in the Code of Conduct, should apply to ADR in general;
vendar opozarja, da bi morala biti – čeprav je spoštovanje zaupnosti osebnih podatkov pomembno – zagotovljena določena raven preglednosti v postopku alternativnega reševanja sporov, ki bi državam članicam in organom alternativnega reševanja omogočala opredelitev in izmenjavo najboljših praks, neodvisnim regulatorjem pa bi dala priložnost, da podrobno preučijo postopek v primerih, ko so bile podane pritožbe;
Notes, however, that whilst respect for the confidentiality of personal data is important, there should also be a level of transparency guaranteed in the ADR process, allowing Member States and ADR bodies to identify and share best practices, and allowing independent regulators the opportunity to scrutinise the procedure in cases where complaints have been made;
je prepričan, da bi moralo alternativno reševanje sporov na splošno in ne zgolj mediacija (člen 8 Direktive 2008/52/ES) vplivati na prekluzivne in zastaralne roke; priznava tveganje, ki ga predstavljajo številne oblike alternativnega reševanja sporov, in tveganje zlorab z zavlačevanjem sodnih postopkov; ugotavlja, da je v študiji izvedljivosti o evropskem pogodbenem pravu http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/consumer/docs/explanatory_note_results_feasibility_study_05_2011_en.pdf.
Believes that not only mediation but ADR in general (Article 8 of Directive 2008/52/EC) should have an effect on limitation and prescription periods; acknowledges the risk posed by the many forms of ADR and the risk of abusive delay of court proceedings; notes that the feasibility study on European Contract Law http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/consumer/docs/explanatory_note_results_feasibility_study_05_2011_en.pdf.
predvidena odložitev zastaralnega roka v primeru postopkov arbitraže in mediacije ter v nekaterih drugih okoliščinah alternativnega reševanja sporov; poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z delom na tem področju;
provides for a suspension of prescription in the case of arbitration and mediation proceedings, and in certain other ADR situations; calls upon the Commission to continue work on this;
je prepričan, da je nujno, da se dogovori iz alternativnega reševanja sporov izvršijo hitro in poceni, tudi čez mejo; poziva k ustreznim zakonodajnim ukrepom;
Is convinced that speedy and inexpensive enforcement of agreements resulting from ADR is indispensable, including cross-border; calls for legislative measures to this end;
opozarja, da je izredno pomembno posebno usposabljanje za nevtralne tretje osebe; poziva Komisijo, naj zbere podatke o zahtevani vrsti in obsegu usposabljanja in naj sektorjem pomaga pri razvoju načrtov usposabljanja in nadziranja kakovosti;
Recalls that specific training for third-party neutrals is essential; calls on the Commission to assemble data on the required type and extent of training, and to assist the sectors in developing training and quality-control schemes;
Alternativno reševanje sporov na različnih področjih
ADR in different areas
podpira namen Komisije, da spodbudi uporabo dostopnega, hitrega, učinkovitega in poceni alternativnega reševanja sporov, ki lahko omogoča vzpostavitev in vzdrževanje kakovostnih trgovinskih, gospodarskih, socialnih in sosedskih odnosov, ki temeljijo na zaupanju, ter prispevajo k visoki ravni varstva potrošnikov, s čemer v primerjavi s sedanjo pravosodno prakso pridobita obe strani;
Supports the Commission's intention of encouraging the use of alternative means of dispute resolution that are accessible, swift, effective and cheap and apt to enable the establishment and maintenance of quality and trust-based commercial, economic, social and neighbourhood relations and to contribute to a high level of consumer protection in a ‘win-win’ situation, with benefits for both sides as compared to current judicial practice;
poudarja, da je kljub temu, da trenutno v Evropi učinkovito delujejo številni sistemi za alternativno reševanje sporov, ena glavnih ovir za njihovo uporabo pomanjkanje enakomernega razvoja tovrstnih sistemov po vsej EU tako v geografskem kot panožnem smislu; zato predlaga, da je treba hitro zapolniti sedanje vrzeli v geografski pokritosti z alternativnim reševanjem sporov v Evropi; obžaluje velike panožne pomanjkljivosti, ki ostajajo v večini držav članic, ter obenem spodbuja izboljšanje pokritosti po panogah z udeleženci, ki poznajo načine delovanja določene panoge; spodbuja države članice, naj predvidijo vzpostavitev enotnih kontaktnih točk po posameznih panogah za zagotavljanje informacij in sprožanje postopkov alternativnega reševanja sporov;
Stresses that, although there are numerous ADR systems operating effectively in Europe at present, one of the main obstacles to their use is the lack of even development of such systems throughout the EU, both in geographical and sectoral terms; suggests, therefore, that existing shortcomings with regard to the geographical coverage of ADR in Europe be rectified rapidly, deplores the major sectoral deficiencies that persist in most Member States, while promoting the improvement of a sector by sector coverage that would involve people who understand the way in which a given sector works; encourages the Member States to consider introducing single points of contact for each sector, to provide information on how to initiate ADR;
opozarja, da je alternativno reševanje sporov še zlasti v interesu malih in srednjih podjetij; ponavlja poziv Komisiji, naj pretehta sinergije med alternativnim reševanjem sporov in posebnim instrumentom znotraj evropskega pogodbenega prava; bi rad pozdravil smernice za klavzule o alternativnem reševanju sporov pri standardnih pogodbah;
Recalls that ADR is of particular interest to SMEs; reiterates its call upon the Commission to consider synergies between ADR and an instrument in EU contract law; would also welcome guidance on ADR clauses in standard contracts;
je seznanjen z dosežki omrežij FIN-NET, ECC-Net in SOLVIT, vendar meni, da so še mogoče izboljšave kar zadeva obveščanje strank in financiranje, ter poziva Komisijo, naj podpre, okrepi in poveča zmogljivosti že obstoječih organov, kot so tisti, ki so že dokazali svojo učinkovitost in vrednost;
Acknowledges the achievements of FIN-NET, ECC-Net and SOLVIT, but believes that, as regards information to parties and funding, there is still room for improvement, and calls on the Commission to support, strengthen and enhance the capabilities of, existing bodies such as these that have demonstrated their effectiveness and value;
meni, da ponuja spletno alternativno reševanje sporov velike možnosti, zlasti za manjše zahtevke; ugotavlja, da na spletu obstajajo tradicionalni postopki alternativnega reševanja sporov, pa tudi taki, ki skušajo preprečiti spore ali prispevati k njihovi lažji razrešitvi; poudarja, da se postopkovnih standardov ne bi smelo zniževati, če pride do tradicionalnega alternativnega reševanja sporov prek spleta, in da bi bilo treba tudi rešiti vprašanja, kot je izvršljivost nagrad; vidi posebno korist spletnih sistemov znakov zaupanja; opozarja na delo delovne skupine o spletnem reševanju sporov UNCITRAL http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/commission/working_groups/3Online_Dispute_Resolution.html.
Sees great potential for online ADR, in particular for smaller claims; notes that traditional ADR procedures exist online alongside others that seek to prevent disputes or to facilitate their resolution; emphasises that, where traditional ADR is carried out online, procedural standards should not be lowered, and that issues such as the enforceability of awards should also be resolved; sees a particular benefit in online trustmark systems; points to the work of the UNICTRAL Working Group on Online Dispute Resolution http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/commission/working_groups/3Online_Dispute_Resolution.html.
, ki je namenjeno transakcijami med podjetji ter med podjetji in potrošniki;
, intended for B2B and business-to-consumer (B2C) transactions;
meni, da se bo z nekakšno hierarhijo poravnave, ki bo vključevala, prvič, interne možnosti za pritožbo, drugič, alternativno reševanje sporov in, kot skrajno sredstvo, postopek pred sodiščem, skrajšal čas in se bodo omejili stroški; poziva Komisijo, naj sektorjem pomaga pri spodbujanju takih sistemov;
Believes that a ‘hierarchy’ of settlement – comprising, firstly, an in-house complaint scheme, secondly, ADR and, only as last resort, litigation – will reduce time and cost; calls upon the Commission to assist the sectors in promoting such systems;
poudarja osrednjo vlogo določenih vrst alternativnega reševanja sporov v družini, saj lahko prispevajo k manjši psihološki škodi, pomagajo strankam, da hitreje ponovno spregovorijo, s tem pa zlasti prispevajo k zaščiti otrok; vidi velike možnosti pri čezmejnem alternativnem reševanju sporov, zlasti zaradi njegove prilagodljivosti; opozarja na delo mediatorke Evropskega parlamenta za mednarodne starševske ugrabitve otrok;
Emphasises the crucial role of types of ADR in family disputes, where it may reduce psychological harm, can help the parties to start talking again and thereby, in particular, help ensure the protection of children; sees potential in cross-border ADR in terms of its flexibility in particular; points also to the work of the European Parliament Mediator for International Parental Child Abduction;
se strinja s Komisijo, da ustrezen dostop do odškodnine na notranjem trgu zahteva hkrati možnost preproste uporabe alternativnega reševanja sporov in tudi učinkovit sistem kolektivne tožbe, saj se dopolnjujeta in medsebojno ne izključujeta;
Agrees with the Commission that appropriate access to reparation in the internal market requires both the possibility of easy recourse to ADR and the existence of an effective system for collective claims, the two being complementary and not mutually exclusive;
meni, da ima alternativno reševanje sporov velike možnosti v okviru sedanje razprave o kolektivnih pravnih sredstvih, saj zagotavlja učinkovito sredstvo reševanja sporov, s katerim se je mogoče izogniti reševanju sporov pred sodišči;
Sees potential for ADR within the ongoing discussion on collective redress, since ADR provides an effective means for dispute settlement that avoids redress action before the courts;
vidi potrebo na ravni EU za alternativno reševanje sporov na področju svobode tiska in osebnostnih pravic, saj so lahko zlasti v primerih zoper čast in dobro ime in pri kršitvah osebnostnih pravic stroški sodnih postopkov, še posebej v nekaterih državah članicah, izredno visoki in bi alternativno reševanje sporov lahko prispevalo k izboljšanju sedanjega stanja;
Sees a need at EU level for ADR in the area of freedom of the press and rights of personality, given that in cases of defamation and breaches of rights of personality in particular, costs of legal proceedings, especially in some Member States, can be ruinous, and that ADR could help to improve the existing situation;
Alternativno reševanje sporov kot mehanizem za reševanje potrošniških sporov
ADR as a mechanism to settle consumer disputes
poudarja, da je treba evropskim potrošnikom zagotoviti dostop do sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov za nadnacionalne in nacionalne spore, zlasti na spletnem trgu, ki se v EU hitro povečuje; ugotavlja, da uporaba sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov omogoča boljše varstvo pravic potrošnikov in dviguje njihovo zaupanje v trg, podjetja in ustanove za varstvo pravic potrošnikov, saj jih dela privlačnejše, obenem pa spodbuja čezmejno trgovino in povečuje uspeh vseh udeležencev na trgu EU;
Stresses the need to ensure that European consumers can access ADR systems for transnational as well as national disputes, especially on the on-line market, which is growing rapidly in the EU; notes that the use of ADR systems affords a higher level of consumer rights protection and boosts consumer confidence in the market, businesses and consumer rights protection institutions by making them more attractive, as well as promoting cross-border trade and increasing the prosperity of all operators in the EU market;
poziva k učinkovitemu sistemu zunajsodnega reševanja potrošniških sporov, ki bo deloval v celotni Evropski uniji;
Calls for an effective out-of-court dispute settlement system for consumer matters which is operational across the EU;