natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
naj poišče načine za izboljšanje volilnih postopkov UNHCR, da bi rešili vprašanje ustreznosti njegovega članstva; naj razmisli o določitvi jasnih meril za članstvo v UNHCR, da se državam, v katerih so kršitve človekovih pravic pogoste, prepreči, da bi postale članice tega sveta; naj v okviru revizije vztraja pri ohranitvi neodvisnosti Urada visoke komisarke za človekove pravice (OHCHR) ter nasprotuje vsem poskusom spremembe statusa tega urada, saj bi to lahko negativno vplivalo na financiranje in posledično tudi na njegovo odvisnost;
to seek ways of improving the UNHRC's election procedures in order to address the issue of the quality of UNHRC membership; to consider the establishment of clear criteria for membership of the UNHRC in order to prevent countries where human rights violations are frequent and widespread from becoming members of the UNHRC; to maintain, in the context of the review, the independence of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and to oppose any attempts to change the status of the OHCHR which could impact negatively on its funding and, consequently, on its independence,
naj razvije delujoče delovno razmerje med UNHCR ter Tretjim odborom in OHCHR ter naj obravnava vse pogostejše znake razhajanj med državami članicami pri glasovanju v UNHCR;
to develop a viable working relationship between the UNHRC and the Third Committee, and between the UNHRC and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR), and to address the growing signs of divisions between Member States concerning their votes in the UNHRC,
naj doseže dogovor o skupnem stališču pred durbansko revizijsko konferenco („Durban 3“), predvidene septembra 2011, in tako izrazi voljo in sposobnost držav članic, da na mednarodnih forumih govorijo z enim glasom, da uveljavi vpliv EU v okviru ZN in potrdi njeno zavezanost uravnoteženemu in nediskriminacijskemu boju proti rasizmu, ksenofobiji in nestrpnosti,
to reach agreement on a common position ahead of the Durban Review Conference (‘Durban 3’), scheduled for September 2011, in order to demonstrate Member States' willingness and capacity to ‘speak with one voice’ in global forums, to assert the EU's influence within the UN framework, and to re-affirm its commitment to combating racism, xenophobia and bigotry in a balanced and non-discriminatory way,
naj nadaljuje prizadevanja v Tretjem odboru generalne skupščine ZN v zvezi s številnimi resolucijami, zlasti glede poziva k moratoriju na izvrševanje smrtne kazni, ki je prejel podporo več držav, ter glede otrokovih pravic, narodnostnih in jezikovnih manjšin, svobode izražanja in svobode medijev, verske nestrpnosti in prepovedi mučenja ter glede resolucij o Burmi/Mjanmaru, Severni Koreji in Iranu; naj podpre vsa prizadevanja, da se izkorenini mučenje; naj še posebej podpre sprejetje izbirnega protokola h Konvenciji ZN o mučenju,
to continue its endeavours in the UNGA Third Committee on a large number of resolutions, in particular on the call for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty, which has received support from more countries, on the rights of the child, on national and linguistic minorities, on freedom of expression and free media, on religious intolerance, on abolishing torture and on the country-specific resolutions on Burma/Myanmar, North Korea and Iran; to support all efforts to eradicate torture; to particularly encourage the adoption of the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on Torture,
naj nadaljuje mednarodna prizadevanja, ki naj bi zagotovila, da se vse človekove pravice obravnavajo kot splošno veljavne, nedeljive ter medsebojno odvisne in povezane; naj si pri tem prizadeva za prenehanje uporabe nedoločenega koncepta „tradicionalnih vrednot človeštva“, ki bi zaradi svoje narave lahko škodoval normam mednarodnega prava o človekovih pravicah in povzročil nesprejemljivo opravičevanje kršitev človekovih pravic, ki izvirajo iz tradicionalnih vrednot, norm ali praks,
to continue international efforts aimed at ensuring that all human rights are considered universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated; in this context, to make efforts to block the use of the undefined concept of ‘traditional values of humankind’, which is of such a nature as to undermine the norms laid down under international human rights law and could lead to unacceptable attempts to justify human rights violations on the grounds that they are the result of traditional values, norms or practices,
naj s posebnimi proračunskimi zavezami podpre financiranje ter zmogljivosti, odgovornosti in učinkovitost organa Ženske ZN, da bo lahko uspešneje usklajeval ustrezne dejavnosti; naj vprašanje enakosti spolov vključi v vse politike ZN in doseže institucionalno skladnost/sinergijo; naj združi vse napore za izvajanje resolucije varnostnega sveta ZN št. 1325, med drugim s prispevkom k izboljšanju strateškega načrtovanja, zlasti kar zadeva navzočnost žensk v mirovnih pogajanjih, saj bi tako ženskam omogočili mediatorstvo, poglobili njihovo znanje in izkušnje, okrepili njihovo moč pri sprejemanju odločitev ter bi jih na splošno povezali z razvojem,
to support the financing, through specific budgetary commitments, and the capacity, accountability and effectiveness of UN Women, so that it can coordinate relevant activities more effectively; to incorporate a gender perspective into all UN policies and create institutional coherence/synergy; to concentrate efforts, also by contributing to improved strategic planning, on the implementation of UNSC Resolution 1325, especially as regards women's presence in peace talks, thereby enabling them to become mediators, improving their skills, and empowering them as decision-makers, and, in general, linking women and development,
naj določi strategijo do držav, ki zavračajo polno sodelovanje z mehanizmi ZN in ne omogočajo dostopa neodvisnim strokovnjakom in posebnim poročevalcem ZN, da bi jih prepričali, naj slednjim omogočijo neomejen dostop na svoje ozemlje in naj ne omejujejo njihovega dela; naj si prizadeva za ohranitev neodvisnosti posebnih postopkov;
to define a strategy vis-à-vis countries which refuse to cooperate fully with the UN mechanisms and allow access by UN independent experts and Special Rapporteurs, with a view to persuading such countries to grant them full access to their territory and refrain from hampering their work; to work towards maintaining the independence of Special Procedures,
naj daje čim večjo politično in diplomatsko prednost ter v skladu s tem nameni v različnih dvo- in večstranskih forumih, v katerih EU aktivno sodeluje, čim večjo podporo vsem pobudam, katerih namen je:
to give the highest political and diplomatic priority and accordingly grant the fullest support, through the various bilateral and multilateral forums in which the EU is an active partner, to all initiatives aimed at:
uvesti svetovni moratorij za pohabljenje ženskih spolnih organov,
establishing a worldwide moratorium on female genital mutilation,
po vsem svetu dekriminalizirati homoseksualnost,
decriminalising homosexuality worldwide,
naj igra vodilno vlogo na področju svetovne podnebne politike in mednarodnega sodelovanja glede podnebnih sprememb; naj se osredotoči na trdne politične zaveze, sklenjene s tretjimi državami, in nadalje razvija dialog z drugimi glavnimi akterji, kot so Združene države, Rusija, države v vzponu (Kitajska, Brazilija, Indija) in države v razvoju, saj so postale podnebne spremembe glavni element mednarodnih odnosov in velika grožnja za doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; naj prispeva k izgradnji institucionalne arhitekture, ki bo vključujoča, pregledna in pravična ter bo zagotavljala uravnoteženo zastopstvo razvitih držav in držav v razvoju v ustreznih upravnih organih, naj postavi trde temelje za prihodnji krog pogajanj, ki bo potekal konec leta 2011 v Južni Afriki (COP17), in se pri tem opre na napredek, dosežen na COP16 v Cancunu, ter upošteva, kar se je naučil iz nezadovoljivega izida COP15 v Københavnu,
to exercise leadership in the area of global climate governance and international cooperation on climate change; to focus on strong political engagement with third countries and to further develop a dialogue with other key actors, such as the United States, Russia, the emerging powers (China, Brazil, India) and developing countries, given that climate change has become a key element of international relations and a major threat to the achievement of the MDGs; to contribute to an institutional architecture that is inclusive, transparent, equitable and provides for balanced representation of both developed and developing countries on relevant governing bodies; to lay down solid foundations for the next meeting negotiations, which will take place in late 2011 in South Africa (COP17), building on the good progress made at COP16 in Cancun and keeping in mind the lessons learned from the unsatisfactory outcome of COP15 in Copenhagen,
naj bolj strateško sodeluje s tretjimi državami in naj bo bolj pozoren do njihovih potreb, hkrati pa razvija zmožnosti Evropske službe za zunanjepolitično delovanje, da vzpostavi politiko podnebne diplomacije; naj podpira dejavno sodelovanje Komisije v tekoči razpravi o pomanjkljivostih v zaščiti in odgovorih, katere pobudnik je visoki komisar ZN za begunce s svojim dialogom o izzivih zaščite iz leta 2010, ki si prizadeva za izboljšanje obstoječega mednarodnega okvira zaščite za nasilno razseljene osebe in osebe brez državljanstva; naj dejavno sodeluje v razpravi o pravni opredelitvi pojma „podnebni begunec“, ki se nanaša na ljudi, ki so zaradi podnebnih sprememb prisiljeni zapustiti svoje domove in si poiskati zatočišče v tujini in ki še ni priznan po mednarodnem pravu ali v pravno zavezujočih mednarodnih sporazumih;
to cooperate more strategically and to be more responsive to the needs of third countries while further developing the EEAS's capacities to build up a climate diplomacy policy; to support the active participation of the Commission in the ongoing debate on Protection Gaps and Responses launched by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in the framework of the 2010 High Commissioner's Dialogue on Protection Challenges which aims to improve the existing international protection framework for forcibly displaced and stateless people; to participate actively in the debate on the term ‘climate refugee’ - intended to describe people who are forced to flee their homes and seek refuge abroad as a consequence of climate change - including a possible legal definition of this term, which is not yet recognised in international law or in any legally binding international agreement,
naj pospeši razpravo o vlogi parlamentov in nacionalnih skupščin v sistemu ZN, ki naj bi bila na dnevnem redu 66. zasedanja generalne skupščine ZN, ter o ustanovitvi parlamentarne skupščine Združenih narodov; naj nadalje spodbuja sodelovanje med vladami in parlamenti glede svetovnih vprašanj,
to foster a debate on the topic of the role of parliaments and regional assemblies in the UN system, which is expected to feature on the agenda of the 66th UNGA session, and on the topic of establishing a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA); further, to promote interaction on global issues between governments and parliaments,
naj se zavzame za ustanovitev parlamentarne skupščine Združenih narodov v sistemu ZN, da se povečajo demokratični značaj, odgovornost in preglednost svetovnega upravljanja ter omogoči večje sodelovanje javnosti pri dejavnostih ZN, pri tem pa prizna, da bi parlamentarna skupščina dopolnjevala obstoječe organe, vključno z medparlamentarno unijo;
to advocate the establishment of a UNPA within the UN system in order to increase the democratic nature, the democratic accountability and the transparency of global governance and to allow for greater public participation in the activities of the UN, acknowledging that a UNPA would be complementary to existing bodies, including the Inter-Parliamentary Union;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje podpredsednici Komisije/visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko in Svetu ter v vednost Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative for the Union of Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Council, and, for information, the Commission.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. junija 2011 o vmesnem pregledu sedmega okvirnega programa Evropske unije za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti ( 2011/2043(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 8 June 2011 on the mid-term review of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Union for research, technological development and demonstration activities ( 2011/2043(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), zlasti členov o raziskavah,
having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular the articles relating to research,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti (z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe preimenovane v Evropsko unijo) za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str.
having regard to the decision No. 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community (or European Union, since the Treaty of Lisbon) for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.
zlasti ob upoštevanju člena 7 zgoraj navedenega sklepa v zvezi s spremljanjem, oceno in pregledom sedmega okvirnega programa,
having particular regard to Article 7 of the above decision on monitoring, evaluation and review of FP7,
ob upoštevanju člena 182(2) PDEU v zvezi s prilagoditvijo okvirnega programa glede na spremenjene okoliščine,
having regard to Article 182(2) TFEU on adaptation of the framework programme as the situation changes,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 9. februarja 2011 z naslovom „Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Odziv na poročilo strokovne skupine o vmesni oceni Sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti ter na poročilo strokovne skupine o vmesni oceni Sklada za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja“ ( KOM(2011)0052 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 9 February 2011 entitled ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Response to the Report of the Expert Group on the Interim Evaluation of the 7th Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities and to the Report of the Expert Group on the Interim Evaluation of the Risk-Sharing Finance Facility’ ( COM(2011)0052 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov 3074. zasedanja Sveta Evropske unije za konkurenčnost (notranji trg, industrija, raziskave in vesolje) z dne 9. marca 2011 o vmesni oceni sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave, skupaj s skladom za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja,
having regard to the conclusions of the Interim Evaluation of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research Activities (FP7), including the risk-sharing finance facility, by the 3074th EU Council meeting on competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) of 9 March 2011,
ob upoštevanju končnega poročila strokovne skupine o vmesni oceni sedmega okvirnega programa z dne 12. novembra 2010,
having regard to the final report of the Expert Group ‘Interim Evaluation of the 7th Framework Programme’ of 12 November 2010,
ob upoštevanju končnega poročila strokovne skupine o oceni programov za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj v okviru šestega okvirnega programa 2002–2006' iz februarja 2009,
having regard to the report of the Expert Group ‘Evaluation of the Sixth Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development 2002-2006’ of February 2009,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij o poenostavitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov, sprejetega na njegovem plenarnem zasedanju 27. in 28. januarja 2011,
having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions, adopted at its plenary session held on 27 and 28 January 2011, on simplifying the implementation of the Research Framework Programmes,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o uresničevanju sinergij med sredstvi za raziskave in inovacije iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj ter sedmim okvirnim programom za raziskave in razvoj v mestih in regijah ter državah članicah in Uniji Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0189 .
having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on the implementation of the synergies of research and innovation earmarked Funds in Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 concerning the European Fund of Regional Development and the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development in cities and regions as well as in the Member States and the Union Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0189 .
ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 9/2007 z dne 22. novembra 2007 o ocenjevanju okvirnih programov EU za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj in o tem, ali je mogoče pristop Komisije izboljšati,
having regard to Special Report No 9/2007 of the European Court of Auditors of 22 November 2007 concerning ‘Evaluating the EU Research and Technological Development (RTD) framework programmes – could the Commission's approach be improved?’,
ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 8/2009 z naslovom „Mreže odličnosti in integrirani projekti v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje?“,
having regard to Special Report No 8/2009 of the European Court of Auditors on networks of excellence and integrated projects in Community research policy,
ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 2/2010 z naslovom „Uspešnost podpornih shem za načrtovalne študije in izgradnjo novih infrastruktur v okviru šestega okvirnega programa za raziskave“,
having regard to Special Report No 2/2010 of the European Court of Auditors on the effectiveness of the Design Studies and Construction of New Infrastructures support schemes under the Sixth Framework Programme for Research,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o poenostavitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov z dne 15. septembra 2010,
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 15 September 2010 on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Simplifying the implementation of the research framework programmes’,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A7-0160/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0160/2011 ),
ker je sedmi okvirni program Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti najobsežnejši instrument za podpiranje raziskav na svetovni ravni in glavno orodje raziskovalne politike Evropske unije,
whereas the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (FP7) is the largest research support instrument in the world and represents the primary tool of European Union research policy,
ker je treba omogočiti spremembe, ki izhajajo iz vmesnega pregleda sedmega okvirnega programa, zaradi številnih sprememb, ki so se zgodile po pogajanjih in sprejetju tega programa leta 2006 (nove institucije, novi politični organi, gospodarska kriza), vendar tudi zaradi obsega finančnih sredstev, ki bodo še na voljo do konca okvirnega programa,
whereas it is necessary to allow for developments resulting from the mid-term review of FP7 in the light of the numerous changes that have taken place since it was negotiated and adopted in 2006 (new institutions, new political bodies, economic crisis), and also given the scale of the financial sums available between now and when it ends,
ker Lizbonska pogodba uvaja evropski raziskovalni prostor kot posebno sredstvo evropske politike,
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon introduces achievement of the European research area as a specific medium of European policy,
ker so v strategiji Evropa 2020 raziskave in inovacije osrednji element pametne, trajnostne in vključujoče rasti,
whereas the Europe 2020 strategy makes research and innovation central to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth,
ker je raziskovanje pretvarjanje ekonomske moči v znanje, medtem ko so inovacije obraten proces, kjer se znanje pretvarja v ekonomsko moč,
whereas research is the process of converting economic power into knowledge, while innovation is the reverse process of transforming knowledge into economic power,
ker morajo EU in države članice najti načine, da se skupaj odzovejo na največje družbene, gospodarske, okoljske, demografske in etične izzive, s katerimi se srečujejo evropski narodi, kot so staranje prebivalstva, zdravje, preskrba s hrano, trajnostni razvoj, veliki okoljski izzivi itd., in ker morajo predlagane rešitve posameznike spodbuditi, da prevzamejo večjo odgovornost za svoja dejanja,
whereas the EU and its Member States must give themselves the means to respond jointly to the major societal, economic, environmental, demographic and ethical challenges facing the peoples of Europe, such as demographic ageing, health, food supply, sustainable development, the major environmental challenges etc., and whereas the resulting solutions must motivate individuals to shoulder greater responsibility for their actions,
ker so naložbe v raziskave, razvoj in inovacije najboljši možni dolgoročni odgovor na sedanjo gospodarsko in finančno krizo, saj omogočajo EU, da bo kot na znanju temelječa družba postala konkurenčna na svetovni ravni,
whereas investment in RDI is the best possible long-term response to the current economic and financial crisis, enabling the EU to become a society with skills that are competitive at world level,
ker Evropa konkurira gospodarskim silam, kot so Kitajska, Indija, Brazilija, Avstralija, Združene države Amerike in Rusija, in ker naša sposobnost združevati in usklajevati prizadevanja, zlasti na raziskovalnem področju, med Evropsko unijo in državami članicami v zelo veliki meri določa našo gospodarsko konkurenčnost in torej možnosti za financiranje naših družbenih ambicij, spoštovanje naših zavez v zvezi z dobrim počutjem evropskih državljanov in varstvom okolja,
whereas Europe is competing with economic powers such as China, India, Brazil, Australia, United States of America, and Russia, and whereas our capacity to unite and coordinate our efforts, particularly in research, between the European Union and the Member States very largely determines our economic competitiveness, and hence the possibility of financing our social ambitions and meeting our commitments concerning the wellbeing of Europe's citizens and the protection of the environment,