natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj odpravi pomanjkljivosti v nadzoru, ki jih je v posebnem poročilu opredelilo Računsko sodišče;
Calls on the Commission to address the weaknesses of controls identified in the Court of Auditors’ special report;
Del VII – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 5/2010 z naslovom ’Izvajanje pristopa iz pobude Leader za razvoj podeželja’
Part VII - Special Report No 5/2010 of the Court of Auditors entitled ’Implementation of the Leader approach for rural development’
ugotavlja, da so na številnih področjih mogoče pomembne izboljšave, da bi zagotovili dodano vrednost, ki je ključna za pristop iz pobude Leader, kot poudarja Računsko sodišče; z razočaranjem ugotavlja, da deset let po zadnji reviziji pristopa iz pobude Leader, ki jo je opravilo Računsko sodišče, še vedno obstajajo enake resne pomanjkljivosti;
Notes that, as the Court of Auditors points out, there are a number of areas where significant improvements can be made to ensure the added value that is key to the Leader approach; finds it very regrettable that 10 years after the Court of Auditor's previous audit of the Leader approach, the same serious weaknesses persist;
podpira priporočila 3, 4, 5 in 6 Računskega sodišča;
Supports recommendations 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Court of Auditors;
se strinja s priporočilom 1, da ne bi smeli odobriti financiranja za končane projekte, vendar meni, da to ne bi smelo preprečiti, da bi iz pobude Leader financirali razširitve obstoječih projektov; zatorej pozdravlja namero Komisije, da pripravi predloge, ki bi omogočali razširitev projektov, če je bila vložena nova prijava za financiranje za naslednje faze;
Agrees with recommendation 1 that funding for projects that have been completed should not be granted but considers that this should not prevent Leader from funding the expansion of existing projects; accordingly, welcomes the Commission's intention to present proposals that would enable the expansion of projects where a new application for funding has been presented for subsequent phases;
ugotavlja, da bi morali biti v priporočilu 2 člani lokalne akcijske skupine ’izvzeti iz vseh razprav, ocen ali sklepov’, če imajo kakršne koli ’osebne, politične, poklicne ali poslovne interese v predlogu projekta’; poleg tega ugotavlja, da finančna uredba prepoveduje akcije, ki bi lahko povzročile nasprotje interesov; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo člani odborov za oceno projektov in odločanje v lokalnih akcijskih skupinah v celoti upoštevali določbe finančne uredbe; se strinja, da bi morala biti pisna izjava o interesih pripravljena, kadar koli je to primerno, in da bi morale biti izjave o interesih objavljene v zapisnikih sestankov;
Notes in recommendation 2 that members of the local action groups (LAGs) should ’be absent from any discussion, assessment or decision’ where they have any ’personal, political, professional or business interest in a project proposal’; notes, in addition, that the Financial Regulation prohibits actions that may result in a conflict of interest; invites the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the Financial Regulation is fully applied by members of the LAG's project assessment and decision making committees; agrees that a written declaration of interest should always be made where relevant and that declarations of interest should be published in the minutes of the meeting;
poziva Komisijo, naj jasno opredeli ’interes v projektu’, in meni, da bi morali postati podrobni zapisniki vseh sestankov, kjer se sprejemajo odločitve, običajni, da bi s tem pomirili skrbi o nepoštenosti pri izbiri projektov in okrepili preglednost in nevtralnost sprejemanja odločitev;
Calls on the Commission to ensure a clear definition of the notion of ’interest in a project’ and takes the view that detailed minutes of all decision making meetings should become the norm, to allay concerns about unfairness in project selection and to reinforce transparency and neutrality in decision making;
meni, da bi morala Komisija za dodano vrednost pobude Leader še bolj spodbujati lokalne akcijske skupine, naj aktivno iščejo lokalne akterje, ki so zmožni razviti več strateških projektov v okolici, kot se trenutno dogaja v nemški deželi Mecklenburg-Pomorjansko in na Irskem;
Believes that, to ensure the ’value-added’ element of Leader, the Commission should further encourage LAGs to undertake outreach work to identify local actors that are able to develop more strategic projects in areas, such as currently happens in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) and Ireland;
poziva Komisijo, naj brez oklevanja uvede ukrepe za večjo preglednost izbire projektov, pri tem pa naj uporabi primere iz nemške dežele Mecklenburg-Pomorjansko in francoske regije Loara, ter meni, da bi bilo treba uvesti sistem, v katerem bi lokalne akcijske skupine objavljale zapisnike sestankov za izbiro projektov na svojih spletiščih;
Calls on the Commission to introduce, without delay, measures that increase the transparency of project selection, using the examples of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) and Pays de la Loire (France) and believes that a system under which LAGs publish minutes of project selection meetings on their websites should be introduced;
Del VIII – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 6/2010 z naslovom ’Ali je reforma trga sladkorja izpolnila glavne cilje?’
Part VIII - Special Report No 6/2010 of the Court of Auditors entitled ’Has the reform of the sugar market achieved its main objectives?’
ugotavlja, da je bila reforma trga sladkorja v Uniji leta 2006 na splošno uspešna in je dosegla večjo konkurenčnost ter premostila razliko v ceni na notranjem trgu Unije in svetovnem trgu;
Notes that, in general terms, the 2006 reform of the Union sugar market was successful and achieved the objectives of increasing competitiveness and bridging the price gap between the internal Union and world market;
ugotavlja, da ima Evropsko računsko sodišče pomisleke glede merjenja konkurenčnosti zgolj po regijah; poudarja, da Komisija ni imela priložnosti, da bi preučila dejansko konkurenčnost posameznih pridelovalcev in tovarn; je zaskrbljen, da novo stanje po reformi ne zagotavlja optimalnega dejanskega potenciala za konkurenčnost v nekaterih regijah, če glede na prej omenjeno konkurenčnost v regijah ne temelji na dejanskem potencialu, temveč na izkrivljanju trga zaradi dokaj visokih kvot v teh regijah na podlagi političnih meril;
Notes that the Court of Auditors has reservations concerning the measurement of competitiveness based solely on regions; emphasises that the Commission did not have the opportunity to examine the actual competitiveness of individual growers and factories; is concerned that, if, accordingly, the competitiveness in a region is based not on its real potential but on the distortion of the market owing to relatively high quotas in some regions based on political criteria, the new situation created by the reform does not guarantee the optimum in terms of the real competitive potential of these regions;
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da bi bili podatki o proizvodnji in uspešnosti pridelovalcev sladkorja zelo koristni pri oceni izvajanja reforme; v skladu s tem sprašuje Komisijo, zakaj teh podatkov ni zahtevala kot pogoj za prejemanje finančne pomoči;
Agrees with the Court of Auditors that data on the productivity and efficiency of sugar producers could be very useful for the purpose of assessing the implementation of the reform; accordingly, asks the Commission why it did not require such data as a prerequisite for receiving financial assistance;
sprašuje Komisijo, zakaj od velikih pridelovalcev sladkorja, ki so se odrekli svoji kvoti v zameno za nadomestilo iz sklada za prestrukturiranje kot finančno spodbudo za zamenjavo sektorja, ni zahtevala podatkov o načinu uporabe teh nadomestil; poleg tega ugotavlja, kako pomembna sta zbiranje takšnih podatkov in njihova obravnava za spodbujanje učinkovitejše in uspešnejše organizacije skupne kmetijske politike v prihodnosti;
Asks the Commission why the big sugar producers who have renounced their quotas by accepting compensation from the restructuring fund as a financial incentive to leave the sector were not asked to provide information on the way that they used that compensation; notes, in addition, the importance of collecting and handling such information in order to promote a more effective and efficient organisation of the Common Agricultural Policy in the future;
opozarja, da imajo tovarne sladkorja pomembno mesto v kmetijski politiki in da je njihova prisotnost na lokalni ravni pogoj za pridelavo pese, čeprav to ne velja za tradicionalne rafinerije sladkornega trsa, glede na to, da se sladkorni trs prideluje zunaj Unije; v skladu s tem sprašuje Komisijo, kako je prehodna pomoč, izplačana industriji sladkornega trsa, prispevala k javnemu dobru;
Recalls that sugar factories occupy an important place in agricultural policy and their presence locally is a prerequisite for beet production, although this does not apply to traditional sugar cane refiners given that sugar cane is produced outside the Union; accordingly, asks the Commission what public good was served by the transitional aid paid to the sugar cane industry;
kar zadeva dodatno kvoto za izoglukozo, poudarja, da njena industrijska proizvodnja ni povezana z lokalno razpoložljivostjo koruze in drugih surovin, cena koruze in drugih surovin za proizvodnjo izoglukoze pa, kot omenja Komisija, ostaja nespremenjena; posledično ugotavlja, da so povpraševanje po izoglukozi in vzorci njene porabe bistveno drugačni kot pri sladkorju; zato se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da ’logika vključevanja teh dodatnih brezplačnih kvot v poznejše odpovedi kvotam nikakor ni jasna’ Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, točka 43.
Emphasises, as far as the additional isoglucose quota is concerned, that its industrial production is not connected with the local availability of maize and other raw materials and that, as the Commission mentions, the price of maize and other raw materials used for processing isoglucose remains unaffected; notes, accordingly, that the demand and the pattern of isoglucose consumption are fundamentally different from sugar consumption; agrees, as a result, with the Court of Auditors that ’the logic of including those additional quotas free of charge in the subsequent quota reductions is far from clear’ Special Report No 6/2010, point 43.
, in sprašuje Komisijo, kateremu javnemu dobru se je služilo v primeru brezplačnih pravic, ki so jih dobili proizvajalci izoglukoze;
and asks the Commission what public good was served in the case of the free allowances which were given to isoglucose producers;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, ali so bila sredstva, zagotovljena za program prestrukturiranja, porabljena za preselitev nekaterih tovarn iz Unije v tretje države, ki so deležne preferencialne obravnave v Uniji, saj subvencioniranje produktivnosti izven Evrope ni bil eden od ciljev reforme trga sladkorja;
Calls on the Commission to examine whether funds provided for the restructuring scheme were used for relocation of some Union factories to third countries that receive preferential treatment from the Union, given that subsidising productivity outside Europe was not one of the objectives of the sugar reform;
opozarja Komisijo na dejstvo, da koristi povečanja industrijske koncentracije v sektorju niso povezane s prenosom znižanja cen na potrošnike ali pa je ta prenos le omejen; zato sprašuje, ali je Komisija v okviru reforme trga sladkorja sprejela kakršnekoli ukrepe oziroma pobude, s katerimi bi zagotovila, da se bodo znižanja cene sladkorja v razsutem stanju prenesla na končnega potrošnika;
Draws the Commission's attention to the fact that the benefits of the increase in industrial concentration in the sector are combined with no or limited transfer of price reductions to consumers; queries, accordingly, whether the Commission took any measures or initiatives during, or within the context of, the sugar reform in order to ensure that reductions in the price of bulk sugar would be passed on to the final consumer;
ugotavlja, da v skladu s posebnim poročilom Računskega sodišča obstajajo ’zelo velike razlike, ki segajo od neto presežka v višini 390 EUR na opuščeno tono v primerjavi z neto stroški zaprtja do neto primanjkljaja v višini 226 EUR na tono’ Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, točka 72.
Notes that, according to the Court of Auditors’ special report, there are ’very wide variations ranging from a net surplus of EUR 390 per tonne renounced compared to the net closure costs to a net deficit of EUR 226 per tonne’ Special Report No 6/2010, point 72.
, in se sprašuje, ali bi bila reforma lahko zasnovana tako, da bi kar najbolj zmanjšala te razlike;
and wonders whether the reform could have been designed in a way which could have minimised these variations;
se strinja z Evropskim računskim sodiščem, da ’ni izčrpnih podatkov o učinku opustitev kvot na lokalna gospodarstva, o številu izgubljenih delovnih mest ali alternativnem zaposlovanju osebja, ki je bilo prej zaposleno v odstranjenih tovarnah’ Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, točka 73.
Agrees with the Court of Auditors that ’there is no comprehensive data on the impact of quota renunciations on the local economies, on how many jobs were lost or alternative employment of the staff previously employed at the factories which were dismantled’ Special Report No 6/2010, point 73.
, in meni, da bi bili ti podatki zelo koristni za splošno predstavo o reformi v zadevnih regijah; v skladu s tem ugotavlja, da pri pretoku sredstev iz Unije k upravičencem lahko na osnovi pravice evropskih davkoplačevalcev, da so seznanjeni s tem pričakujemo povratni tok preglednih informacij o načinih porabe teh sredstev, kar v nobenem pogledu ni v nasprotju s pristojnostmi držav članic;
and considers these data very useful in order to have an overall picture of the reform on the regions concerned; notes, accordingly, that when funds from the Union flow towards a beneficiary, a reverse flow of transparent information on the way these funds were used, which is in no way contradictory to the Member States’ competencies, can be expected, based on the European taxpayer's right to know;
se strinja z Evropskim računskim sodiščem, da bi morale države članice, ki so se odločile dodeliti pomoč za diverzifikacijo, vzpostaviti nacionalne programe prestrukturiranja s podrobnimi informacijami o ukrepih diverzifikacije, ki jih je treba sprejeti v zadevnih revijah, in Komisijo obvestiti o teh programih; zato poziva Komisijo, naj sporoči učinke pomoči za diverzifikacijo v zadevnih regijah;
Agrees with the Court of Auditors that the Member States which decided to grant aid for diversification should have established national restructuring programmes detailing the diversification measures to be undertaken in the regions concerned and should have informed the Commission about these programmes; calls, accordingly, on the Commission to give an indication of the impact of the diversification aid on the regions affected;
se strinja z Evropskim računskim sodiščem, da bi morala Komisija predlagati vrsto ukrepov za ’odstranitev togosti in omejitev v sedanjem sistemu kvot, ki negativno vplivajo na konkurenčnost pridelovalcev in proizvajalcev’ Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, priporočilo 2.
Agrees with the Court of Auditors that the Commission should propose a series of measures ’to remove the rigidities and constraints in the current quota system which affect adversely the competitiveness of growers and producers’ Special Report No 6/2010, recommendation 2.
glede na ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, da je Unija postala bolj odvisna od uvoza, ne more podati mnenja o odgovoru Komisije, da se v splošnem ’stopnja samooskrbe v okviru kvote, obdržane po reformi (približno 85 %), šteje za zadovoljivo’ Posebno poročilo št. 6/2010, odgovor Komisije, točka 58.
Is unable, with regard to the Court of Auditors’ remark that the Union has become more dependent on imports, to pass judgment on the Commission's reply that, in general terms, ’the level of self-supply within quota maintained after the reform (around 85 %) can be considered satisfactory’ Special Report No 6/2010, Commission reply, point 58.
, če se pri tem upošteva odprtje trga Unije za tretje države; ugotavlja, da razprava o razpoložljivosti preskrbe ni dobro dokumentirana ali utemeljena, da Parlament ni imel dostopa do študij glede optimalne ravni razpoložljivosti preskrbe s sladkorjem ali možnih scenarijev, ki prikazujejo posledice pomanjkanja sladkorja, ter možnih odzivov (in ustreznih stroškov) v primeru večje motnje na svetovnem trgu sladkorja;
, taking into account the opening of the Union market to third countries; notes that the discussion on availability of supply is not well documented or substantiated, Parliament had no access to any studies regarding the optimum level of sugar availability or possible scenarios demonstrating the consequences of its unavailability and the possible reactions (and the relevant costs) in case of a major disruption of the world sugar market;
Del IX – Posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 8/2010 z naslovom ’Izboljševanje prevozne zmogljivosti na vseevropskih železniških oseh: ali so bile investicije EU v železniško infrastrukturo uspešne?’
Part IX - Special Report No 8/2010 of the Court of Auditors entitled ’Improving transport performance on Trans-European rail axes: Have EU rail infrastructure investments been effective?’
pozdravlja objavo dobro pripravljenega in konstruktivnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča in temeljito analizo, ko jo je opravilo;
Welcomes the publication of the well-prepared and constructive report by the Court of Auditors and the thorough analysis carried out by the Court;
meni, da bi boljša opredelitev prednostnih projektov lahko še okrepila usklajevanje in osredotočenje finančnih sredstev Unije; poziva Komisijo, naj določi opredelitev prednostnih projektov v skladu z dokazljivimi potrebami po obstoječih in predvidenih železniških storitvah;
Is of the opinion that improvements in the definition of the Priority Projects could further enhance the co-ordination and concentration of Union financial resources; calls on the Commission to determine the definition of Priority Projects according to demonstrable needs in terms of existing and anticipated rail services;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe za prilagoditev železniške infrastrukture, da bo služila vseevropskim storitvam, in v tem okviru za izgradnjo manjkajočih povezav na čezmejnih lokacijah, odpravo ozkih grl na pomembnih križiščih in nadomestitev ali nadgradnjo stare železniške infrastrukture;
Calls on the Commission to take necessary action in order to adapt the rail infrastructure to cater for trans-European services while creating missing links at cross-border locations, removing bottlenecks on important junctions and replacing or upgrading the old rail infrastructure;
pozdravlja prizadevanje Komisije, da bi s sprejeto zakonodajo dosegla napredek na evropski ravni; meni, da bi morala Komisija še izboljšati sodelovanje z državami članicami, da bi se zakonodajni ukrepi v zvezi z varnostjo v železniškem prometu in pravicami potnikov, odpiranjem trga in medoperabilnostjo na ravni Unije uspešno prenesli v nacionalno zakonodajo;
Welcomes the Commission's effort to make progress at European level with the legislation adopted; is of the opinion that the Commission should further improve cooperation with the Member States in order for legislative measures regarding rail safety and passenger rights, market opening and interoperability at the Union level to be successfully transposed into national legislation;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije, da bi še naprej vlagala znatna sredstva, ki bodo prispevala k izboljšanju priprave projektov;
Welcomes the Commission's efforts to continue investing significant resources which contribute to the improvement of project preparation;
poziva Komisijo, naj se posvetuje z zunanjimi strokovnjaki za železniško infrastrukturo, da bi bolje ocenila tehnične vidike predlaganih projektov pred odobritvijo v okviru Kohezijskega sklada;
Urges the Commission to consult external rail infrastructure experts in order to better evaluate the technical aspects of proposed projects prior to their approval under the Cohesion Fund;
poudarja potrebo po spodbujanju boljše priprave projektov, da bi se pri prihodnjih projektih zmanjšalo tveganje povečevanja stroškov zaradi nepredvidljivih dejavnikov, kot so nepričakovano težki geografski pogoji in okoljevarstvene zahteve;
Stresses the need to promote better preparation of projects in order to reduce the risk of cost escalations of future projects influenced by unforeseeable factors, such as unexpectedly difficult geographical conditions, and environmental protection requirements;
ugotavlja, da včasih nastopijo zamude, preden je infrastruktura pripravljena za uporabo; poziva Komisijo, naj tesneje sodeluje z državami članicami, da bi pri prihodnjem načrtovanju dosegli potrebna izboljšanja;
Notes that there are sometimes delays before infrastructure becomes available for use; asks the Commission to cooperate more closely with the Member States in order to make the necessary improvements in future planning;
pozdravlja dosežene zmogljivosti na odsekih potniških prog za visoke hitrosti, ki izpolnjujejo pričakovanja;
Welcomes effective performance on sections dedicated to high-speed passenger services, which is found to be in line with expectations;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče opazilo različne težave, med drugim razlike v širini koloteka, vlečni energiji, sistemih za nadzor (signalizacijo) vlakov, dolžini vlakov in operativnih pravilih; poziva Komisijo, naj bolj pomaga državam članicam, da bodo napredovale pri odpravljanju takih ovir, kar bi lahko spodbudilo izboljšanje razvoja vseevropskih prometnih povezav; izpostavlja, da mora Unija igrati pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju medoperabilnosti nacionalnih omrežij ter slednje tudi učinkovito finančno podpreti;
Notes that the Court of Auditors observed various complications, including differences in gauge, traction energy, train control (signalling) systems, train length and operational rules; asks the Commission to better assist the Member States in making progress to alleviate such complications which would facilitate improvements in developing trans-European transport links; points out that the Union needs to play an important role in promoting the interoperability of national networks along with efficient financial support;
ugotavlja, da se je z imenovanjem evropskih koordinatorjev bistveno izboljšalo izvajanje projektov TEN-T zaradi osredotočenja naložb in spodbujanja razvoja prednostnih projektov; poziva Komisijo, naj obdrži vlogo, ki jo trenutno igrajo koordinatorji, in oceni možnost imenovanja dodatnih koordinatorjev na tistih odsekih prednostnih projektov, kjer so se pojavile večje težave;
Notes that the appointment of European coordinators has considerably improved the implementation of TEN-T projects by concentrating investments and facilitating development of Priority Projects; calls on the Commission to maintain the role currently played by the coordinators and to evaluate the possibility of appointing more coordinators in the sections of Priority Projects that face significant complications;
meni, da je treba pristojnosti izvajalske agencije TEN-T razširiti, tako da se poveča učinkovit nadzor in uvede postopek ocenjevanja sofinanciranja prednostnih projektov;
Is of the opinion that the responsibilities of the TEN-T Executive Agency need to be extended in terms of an increase of effective control and the evaluation procedure in respect of the co-financing of Priority Projects;
ugotavlja, da se je osredotočenje sofinanciranja TEN-T na čezmejne lokacije od leta 2006 povečalo, vendar je treba doseči še veliko, med drugim tudi odpraviti ozka grla in dopolniti manjkajoče povezave;
Notes that while the concentration of TEN-T co-financing at cross-border locations has improved since 2006, much remains to be achieved, including the elimination of the bottlenecks and the filling-in of missing links;
poudarja, da je treba vse preostale težave in vprašanja oceniti pri pripravi pregleda smernic TEN-T;
Emphasises that all the remaining problems and issues need to be evaluated while preparing for the review of the TEN-T guidelines;