natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da morajo ukrepi za razvoj podeželja odgovarjati na izzive na področju prehranske varnosti, trajnostnega upravljanja naravnih virov, podnebnih sprememb, izgube biotske raznovrstnosti, izčrpavanja vodnih virov in siromašenja prsti ter da morajo okrepiti uravnoteženo teritorialno kohezijo in zaposlenost; meni, da bi bilo treba s temi ukrepi spodbujati tudi samozadostnost pri proizvodnji obnovljive energije na kmetiji, predvsem iz kmetijskih odpadkov; zagovarja, da bi morali z ukrepi za razvoj podeželja ohranjati povečano dodano vrednost na podeželju, spodbujati krepitev podeželske infrastrukture in zagotavljanje storitev lokalnemu prebivalstvu in podjetjem po primernih cenah;
Considers that rural development measures must respond to the challenges in the fields of food security, sustainable management of natural resources, climate change, biodiversity loss, depletion of water and soil fertility, and must enhance balanced territorial cohesion and employment; considers that these measures should also encourage self-sufficiency in production of on-farm renewable energy, notably from agricultural waste products; affirms that rural development measures should help to keep increased added value in rural areas, promoting the enhancement of rural infrastructure and the provision of affordable services to local populations and businesses;
glede na to meni, da bi bilo treba posebno pozornost nameniti pomoči mladim kmetom; meni, da so glede na hitro se starajoče podeželsko prebivalstvo v Evropi potrebni privlačni ukrepi, s katerimi bi spodbudili uveljavitev mladih kmetov in drugih novincev, ter da je treba razširiti sheme podpor v drugem stebru, na primer na dostop do zemljišč, subvencij in ugodnih posojil, zlasti na področju inovacij, posodabljanja in razvoja naložb itd; poleg tega pričakuje, da bo izvajanje takih mehanizmov možno v vseh državah članicah;
Considers that, in this context, particular attention should be devoted to assisting young farmers; believes that, given the rapidly ageing rural population in Europe, attractive measures to encourage the establishment of young farmers and other new entrants is essential and that support schemes in the second pillar should be extended, e.g. access to land, grants and favourable loans, particularly in the fields of innovation, modernisation and the development of investment etc., and expects that the implementation of such mechanisms will be made available in all Member States;
predlaga, naj se precejšen odstotek kmetijske zemlje vključi v kmetijsko-okoljske sheme, ki morajo zagotavljati finančne in tehnične spodbude kmetom za preusmeritev na bolj trajnostne, z viri učinkovite načine kmetovanja z manjšimi vložki;
Proposes that a substantial percentage of agricultural land should be covered by agri-environmental schemes, which should provide financial and technical incentives for farmers to convert to more sustainable, more resource-efficient, lower-input models of farming;
poudarja, da mora politika razvoja podeželja omogočiti uporabo vsega naravnega in človeškega potenciala na podeželju s pomočjo kakovostne kmetijske proizvodnje, na primer z neposredno prodajo, s promocijo proizvodov, preskrbo lokalnih trgov, diverzifikacijo, pa tudi trgi biomase, energijsko učinkovitostjo itd;
Emphasises that rural development policy must enable all natural and human potential of rural areas to be harnessed also by means of quality agricultural production, for example by means of direct sales, product promotion, supplying local markets and diversification as well as biomass outlets, energy efficiency, etc.;
poudarja, da je potrebna ustrezna infrastruktura za razvoj in širjenje sistemov kmetijskega znanja in inovacij, pa tudi možnosti za izobraževanje in usposabljanje, kmetijske svetovalne službe in izmenjava najboljše prakse, da bi posodobili kmetijstvo, pomagali inovativnim kmetom pri posredovanju njihovih izkušenj in izboljšali verige dodane vrednosti na podeželju; meni, da morajo biti taki programi na voljo v vseh državah članicah;
Stresses that appropriate infrastructure for the development and dissemination of agricultural knowledge and innovation systems is needed, including education and training opportunities, farm advisory services and exchange of best practices, so as to modernise agriculture, help innovative farmers to pass on their experience and improve added value chains in rural areas; believes that such programmes should be made available in all Member States;
zato zagovarja uvedbo usmerjenih ukrepov v drugem stebru, ki jih določijo države članice, da bi uresničili skupne cilje razvoja podeželja EU (strategija 2020); poudarja pomen splošnega usmerjenega evropskega okvira s poudarkom na rezultatih, hkrati pa priznava, da so države članice in regionalne oblasti najprimernejše za odločanje o programih, ki lahko lokalno največ prispevajo k evropskim ciljem; zato poziva k uporabi subsidiarnosti in prožnosti pri pripravi programov za razvoj podeželja, k močnem participativnemu lokalnemu in subregionalnemu partnerskemu pristopu, pri čemer se pri pripravi in izvajanju prihodnjih evropskih in nacionalnih programov za razvoj podeželja uporablja metoda LEADER; meni, da bi bilo treba na podlagi ocen učinka in podrobnih simulacij določiti zmanjšan nacionalni prispevek, veljaven za bolj usmerjene ukrepe;
Advocates, therefore, introducing targeted measures, to be decided by the Member States in the second pillar, to attain common rural development objectives of the EU (2020 Strategy); underlines the importance of an overall targeted and outcome-oriented European framework, while recognising that Member States and regional authorities are best placed to decide on the programmes which, locally, can make the greatest contribution to European targets; calls, therefore, for subsidiarity and flexibility to apply when designing rural development programmes and for a strong participative local and subregional partnership approach, applying the LEADER method in the design and implementation of the future European and national rural development programmes; considers that a reduced national contribution applicable to the more targeted measures should be determined on the basis of impact assessments and detailed simulations;
se zavzema za to, da se v okviru razvoja podeželja pripravijo tudi ciljno usmerjeni ukrepi za varstvo gorskih gozdov;
Advocates, in the context of rural development, that targeted measures also be provided for the protection of mountain forest;
poziva Komisijo, naj ustvari nove finančne instrumente v podporo zlasti kmetom, ki vstopajo v kmetijski sektor, pri pridobivanju ugodnih posojil, ali nov sistem, na primer imenovan JERICHO („Izbira za skupne naložbe v podeželje“ –'Joint Rural Investment CHOice„), za Sklad za razvoj podeželja, ki bo temeljil na izkušnjah pobude JEREMIE v okviru strukturnih skladov;
Asks the Commission to establish new financing tools supporting especially farmers entering the agricultural sector in getting access to favourable loans, or a new system, for instance called JERICHO (‘Joint Rural Investment CHOice’), for the Rural Development Fund, based on the experience from the JEREMIE initiative under the Structural Funds;
poudarja, da so območja z omejenimi možnostmi pogosto velikega pomena za kulturno krajino, ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti in zagotavljanje okoljskih koristi ter dinamiko podeželja; glede na to se zavzema, da se v drugem stebru ohrani nadomestilo za območja z omejenimi možnostmi ter poziva k njegovi večji učinkovitosti; meni, da je ciljno usmerjena narava podpore kmetom, ki kmetujejo na območjih z omejenimi možnostmi, najpomembnejša za nadaljevanje kmetijskih dejavnosti na teh območjih, kar zmanjšuje tveganje za opuščanje zemlje; poudarja, da morajo natančno prilagoditev opraviti države članice ter regionalne in lokalne oblasti v okviru EU;
Stresses that Less Favoured Areas (LFAs) are often of high value in terms of the cultivated landscape, biodiversity preservation and provision of environmental benefits, as well as for the dynamism of rural areas; advocates in this context that the compensatory allowance for disadvantaged areas in the second pillar be retained and calls for its effectiveness to be increased; believes that the targeted nature of support to farmers operating in LFAs is of the utmost importance for the continuation of agricultural activities in these areas, thereby reducing the threat of land abandonment; emphasises that the fine tuning of criteria must lie with Member States, and regional and local authorities, within the EU framework;
hkrati pa poudarja, da se podeželske strukture v državah članicah zelo razlikujejo in zaradi tega potrebujejo različne ukrepe; zato poziva k večji prilagodljivosti, da lahko države članice in regije uvedejo prostovoljne ukrepe, ki bi jih morala sofinancirati EU pod pogojem, da je bila Komisija o teh ukrepih obveščena in jih je potrdila; opozarja, da bo treba pri stopnji sofinanciranja še naprej upoštevati posebne potrebe in razmere konvergenčnih regij v obdobju po letu 2013;
Stresses that rural structures differ widely in the Member States and therefore require different measures; calls therefore for greater flexibility to allow the Member States and regions to adopt voluntary measures, which should be cofinanced by the EU on condition that these measures have been notified to the Commission and approved; points out that the cofinancing rate should continue to take account of the specific needs and circumstances of convergence regions in the post-2013 period;
se zavzema za to, da za ukrepe v drugem stebru, ki so za države članice posebej pomembni, tudi po letu 2013 veljajo sedanje stopnje sofinanciranja; vendar poudarja, da dodatno nacionalno financiranje ne sme privesti do ponovne nacionalizacije drugega stebra ali povečati vrzeli med sposobnostmi držav članic, da sofinancirajo svoje prednostne naloge;
Advocates that, in the case of second-pillar measures which are of particular importance to Member States, the current cofinancing rates should continue to apply after 2013; stresses, however, that any additional national cofinancing should not lead to a renationalisation of the second pillar or increase the gap in Member States' ability to cofinance their priorities;
ponovno opozarja, da se vse oblike obvezne in prostovoljne modulacije za financiranje ukrepov za razvoj podeželja prenehajo uporabljati leta 2012, ter poudarja, da je v naslednjem finančnem obdobju treba zagotoviti ustrezne finančne vire za drugi steber;;
Recalls that modulation, in all its varieties, both compulsory and voluntary, as a means to fund rural development measures expires in 2012 and highlights the need to secure adequate funding resources for pillar 2 in the next funding period;
zahteva, da se pri dodeljevanju sredstev v drugem stebru izogiba nenadnim spremembam, saj države članice, lokalne oblasti in kmetije za načrtovanje potrebujejo gotovost in stalnost; poudarja, da razprava o razdelitvi teh sredstev ne bi smela biti ločena od razprave o razdelitvi sredstev iz prvega stebra; zato poziva Komisijo, naj kot temeljno načelo za prerazporeditev sredstev iz drugega stebra zavzame pragmatičen pristop; priznava, da je treba sredstva iz drugega stebra pošteno razdeliti med državami članicami po objektivnih merilih, ki morajo odražati raznolikost potreb na evropskih območjih; se zavzema, da se te spremembe uvedejo po omejenem prehodnem obdobju skupaj s spremembami razdelitve sredstev iz prvega stebra;
Calls for abrupt changes in the allocation of appropriations in the second pillar to be avoided, as Member States, local authorities and farms require certainty and continuity to enable them to plan; emphasises that the discussions on the allocation of this funding should be indissociable from the discussions on the allocation of funding under the first pillar; calls therefore on the Commission to establish a pragmatic approach, as the fundamental principle for the redistribution of second-pillar funds; recognises the need for a fair distribution of second-pillar funds between Member States according to objective criteria that must reflect the diversity of needs in European areas; advocates that these changes be achieved after a limited transition period in parallel with the changes made to first-pillar fund distribution;
daje prednost pravilom o sofinanciranju razvoja podeželja, ki na regionalni ali lokalni ravni omogočajo dopolnjevanje javnih in zasebnih sredstev iz nacionalno sofinanciranega deleža, kar povečuje razpoložljiva sredstva za uresničevanje ciljev, opredeljenih v javni politiki za podeželje;
Favours rules on cofinancing in rural development that allow, at regional or local level, for complementarities between public and private funds of the nationally cofinanced share, thus reinforcing the available means to pursue the objectives defined by public policy for rural areas;
poziva k poenostavitvi načrtovanja in upravljanja programov v drugem stebru na vseh ravneh, da bi povečali učinkovitost; poziva k še bolj preprostim, učinkovitim in uspešnim sistemom za spremljanje, ocenjevanje in poročanje ukrepov navzkrižne skladnosti; meni, da je treba s podobnimi predpisi in postopki uskladiti nadzor in spremljanje za prvi in drugi steber ter ju bolj povezati, da bi zmanjšali celotno breme nadzora za kmete; poziva k bolj prožnemu upravljanju petletnega ciljnega obdobja za kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe;
Calls for a simplification at all levels of programme planning and management in the second pillar in order to boost efficiency; calls further for simplified, effective and efficient systems for the monitoring, evaluation and reporting of cross-compliance measures; believes that checks and monitoring for the first and second pillars should be harmonised and made more coherent, with similar rules and procedures, to reduce the overall burden of checks on farmers; calls for more flexible operation of the five-year commitment period for agri-environmental measures;
poziva, naj se zadruge izvzamejo iz določb Priporočila Komisije 2003/61/ES v zvezi z neupravičenostjo podjetij, ki presegajo navedene mejne vrednosti za mala in srednja podjetja za dostop do sredstev za razvoj podeželja in na splošno do finančne pomoči nad določeno mejno vrednostjo;
Calls for cooperatives to be exempted from the provisions of Commission Recommendation 2003/61/EC regarding the non-eligibility of undertakings exceeding specified SME thresholds for access to rural development funding and, in general, aid payments above a certain limit;
meni, da bi morale biti v prihodnje najbolj oddaljene regije še naprej deležne posebne obravnave v okviru politike za razvoj podeželja, saj geografske težave, s katerimi se soočajo, in majhno število kmetijskih proizvodov, od katerih je odvisno podeželsko gospodarstvo na teh območjih, upravičujejo ohranitev stopnje sofinanciranja Skupnosti do 85 % za kritje stroškov njihovih programov za razvoj podeželja;
Takes the view that the outermost regions should continue to benefit from specific treatment under rural development policy in the future, since the geographical difficulties that they face and the small number of agricultural products on which the rural economy in these areas depends justify maintaining a Community cofinancing rate of up to 85% to cover the cost of their rural development programmes;
pozdravlja premik v smeri večjega usklajevanja na ravni EU zlasti med programi za razvoj podeželja in kohezijsko politiko, da bi preprečili podvajanje, protislovne cilje in prekrivanje; vendar opozarja, da je obseg projektov v okviru kohezijske politike EU in programov za razvoj podeželja različen, in zato priporoča, da ostanejo sredstva ločena in da programi za razvoj podeželja ohranijo poudarek na podeželskih skupnostih in se ohranijo kot politično neodvisni instrumenti;
Welcomes the move towards greater coordination at EU level between rural development programmes and cohesion policy in particular, with a view to avoiding duplication, contradictory objectives and overlapping; recalls, however, that the scale of the projects under EU cohesion policy and rural development programmes is different and therefore advocates that the funds remain distinct and that rural development programmes maintain their focus on rural communities and be preserved as politically autonomous instruments;
meni, da se bo prek kohezijske politike ter nove in močne skupne kmetijske politike sprostil gospodarski potencial podeželskih območij in ustvarila varna delovna mesta, kar zagotavlja trajnosten razvoj teh območij;
Takes the view that cohesion policy, together with a new and powerful CAP, will release the economic potential of rural areas and generate secure jobs, guaranteeing the sustainable development of these areas;
poudarja pomen politik za spodbujanje čezmejnega sodelovanja med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, da bi uvedli prakse za varovanje okolja in zagotovili trajnost naravnih virov v primerih, ko imajo kmetijske dejavnosti, predvsem poraba vode, čezmejne posledice;
Stresses the importance of policies designed to encourage cross-border cooperation between Member States and third countries with a view to the adoption of practices to protect the environment and ensure the sustainability of natural resources in cases where farming activities, in particular the use of water, have cross-border implications;
ob upoštevanju pisma predsednika Odbora za ustavne zadeve z dne 15. junija 2011,
having regard to the letter of 15 June 2011 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,
sklene, da se členu 13(1) Poslovnika doda sledeča razlaga:
Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 13(1):
ob upoštevanju členov 21 in 26 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, ki določata pravice invalidnih oseb,
having regard to Articles 21 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which set out the rights of persons with disabilities,
ker so države članice EU podpisnice Konvencije Organizacije združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov,
whereas the EU Member States have signed the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
ker člen 56a Direktive 2004/27/ES o zakoniku Skupnosti o zdravilih za uporabo v humani medicini določa, da mora biti ime na ovojnini izpisano tudi v Braillovi pisavi,
whereas Article 56a of Directive 2004/27/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use specifies that the name of medicinal products must be expressed in Braille format on their packaging,
poudarja, da imajo osebe z motnjami vida pravico do samostojnega življenja in polne udeležbe v družbi;
Stresses that people with visual disabilities have the right to an independent life and full participation in society;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj z deležniki začne obsežna posvetovanja o stroških, učinkovitosti in izvedljivosti tega, da bi na ravni Skupnosti uvedli prostovoljni sistem označevanja v Braillovi pisavi na embalaži industrijskih izdelkov, ki bi vključevalo vsaj podatke o vrsti izdelka in preteku roka, da bi potrošnikom z motnjami vida olajšali dostop do teh podatkov; glede na to, da ne znajo vsi slepi brati Braillove pisave, bi se moralo med predlaganim posvetovanjem proučiti tudi druge načine za omogočanje dostopa do podatkov na embalaži;
Calls on the European Commission to launch a wide consultation with stakeholders on the cost, efficiency and feasibility of introducing at Community level a voluntary system of labelling in Braille format on the packaging of industrial products which would include, at least, information on the type of product and its expiry date in order to facilitate access for consumers with visual disabilities; given that not all blind people can read Braille, the proposed consultation should also investigate alternative ways of enabling access to information on packaging;
poziva Komisijo, naj v skladu z načeli družbene odgovornosti gospodarskih družb pripravi pobude za evropsko industrijo in družbe, ki jih bodo ozavestile o tem vprašanju;
Calls on the Commission, in line with the principles of Corporate Social Responsibility, to provide incentives for European industries and enterprises that will raise their awareness of this issue;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to izjavo skupaj z imeni podpisnikov Seznam podpisnikov je objavljen v Prilogi 1 k zapisniku z dne 23. junija 2011 ( P7_PV-PROV(2011)06-23(ANN1) ).
Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories The list of signatories is published in Annex 1 to the Minutes of 23 June 2011 ( P7_PV-PROV(2011)06-23(ANN1) ).
posreduje Komisiji, parlamentom držav članic in Organizaciji združenih narodov.
, to the Commission, the Parliaments of the Member States and the United Nations.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. julija 2011 o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v skladu s točko 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (vloga EGF/2010/025 DK/Odense Steel Shipyard z Danske) ( KOM(2011)0251 – C7-0114/2011 – 2011/2093(BUD) )
European Parliament resolution of 5 July 2011 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/025 DK/Odense Steel Shipyard from Denmark) ( COM(2011)0251 – C7-0114/2011 – 2011/2093(BUD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2011)0251 – C7-0114/2011 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2011)0251 – C7-0114/2011 ),
in zlasti točke 28 Sporazuma,
(IIA of 17 May 2006), and in particular point 28 thereof,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0234/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0234/2011 ),
ker je Evropska unija oblikovala ustrezne zakonodajne in proračunske instrumente za zagotavljanje dodatne podpore delavcem, ki so jih prizadele posledice velikih strukturnih sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih, ter za pomoč pri njihovi ponovni vključitvi na trg dela,
whereas the European Union has set up the appropriate legislative and budgetary instruments to provide additional support to workers who are suffering from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist their reintegration into the labour market,
ker je bilo za vloge, predložene od 1. maja 2009 dalje, področje uporabe Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (ESPG) razširjeno na podporo delavcem, ki so postali presežni neposredno zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize,
whereas the scope of the EGF was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis,
ker mora biti finančna pomoč Unije presežnim delavcem dinamična ter na voljo čim hitreje in na najučinkovitejši način v skladu s skupno izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, sprejeto na usklajevalnem sestanku 17. julija 2008, in ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 glede sprejetja sklepov za uporabo sredstev ESPG,
whereas the Union's financial assistance to workers made redundant should be dynamic and made available as quickly and efficiently as possible, in accordance with the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008, and having due regard for the IIA of 17 May 2006 in respect of the adoption of decisions to mobilise the EGF,
ker je Danska zaprosila za pomoč v zvezi s 1356 presežnimi delavci (od tega naj bi jih pomoč prejelo 950) v podjetju Odense Steel Shipyard, ki deluje v ladjedelniškem sektorju v občini Odense v južnem delu Danske,
whereas Denmark has requested assistance in respect of cases concerning 1356 redundancies (of which 950 targeted for assistance) in the enterprise Odense Steel Shipyard operating in shipyard sector in the municipality of Odense located in the region of Southern Denmark,