natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
podpira zamisli Komisije, da bi se pri izvajanju strukturnih skladov bolj upoštevala usmerjenost k rezultatom, in meni, da je strateško poročanje kot dragoceno orodje za spremljanje napredka pri izvajanju osnova za medsebojne strokovne preglede in strateško razpravo na ravni EU; za kakovostnejše strateško poročanje, ki bo temeljilo na primerljivih in zanesljivih podatkih, države članice spodbuja, naj sprejmejo bolj analitičen in strateški pristop pri oblikovanju nacionalnih poročil z večjo osredotočenostjo na cilje, rezultate in strateški razvoj ter pravočasno posredujejo točne informacije o temeljnih kazalnikih in dogovorjenih ciljih; zato poudarja, da mora biti strateško poročilo 2013 usmerjeno k rezultatom in bolj osredotočeno na kvalitativno analizo učinkovitosti programov, učinkov, izidov in zgodnjih učinkov, namesto k pretiranemu predstavljanju statističnih podatkov;
Supports the ideas put forward by the Commission aimed at placing greater emphasis on result-based implementation of Structural Funds and considers that strategic reporting, as a valuable tool of monitoring progress in implementation, creates a basis for peer review and strategic debate at EU level; with a view to achieving better quality strategic reporting, based on comparative and reliable data, encourages Member States to adopt a more analytical and strategic approach while elaborating national reports with stronger focus on objectives, results and strategic developments and to submit timely, accurate information on the core indicators and the agreed targets; stresses therefore that the Strategic report 2013 should be result-oriented and focused more on qualitative analysis of the effectiveness of programmes, outputs, outcomes and early impacts rather than on excessive presentation of statistical data;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj ob vmesnem pregledu finančne perspektive 2007–2013 in kohezijske politike izkoristijo priložnost in zagotovijo povečano absorpcijo evropskih sredstev za obdobje 2011–2013;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to use the opportunity of the mid-term review of the financial perspective 2007-2013 and of cohesion policy to ensure increased absorption of European funding in the period 2011-2013;
poziva vse institucije EU in države članice, naj si v naslednjem krogu pogajanj o prihodnji kohezijski politiki prizadevajo za hitrejše sprejetje najpomembnejših dokumentov, kot so večletni finančni okvir in uredbe, da bi skušali odpraviti začetne težave, ki bi se utegnile pojaviti ob začetku naslednjega programskega obdobja;
Calls on all EU institutions and Member States, with a view to the next round of negotiations on the future cohesion policy, to facilitate speedier conclusion of key documents, such as the multiannual financial framework and regulations, in the next round of negotiations with a view to overcoming the start-up difficulties that might arise at the beginning of the next programming period;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo imela prihodnja kohezijska politika ustrezna finančna sredstva; meni, da je ni mogoče imeti preprosto za sredstvo za uresničevanje ciljev drugih sektorskih politik, temveč gre za politiko Unije, ki zagotavlja znatno dodano vrednost in ima lasten smisel: ekonomsko, socialno in teritorialno kohezijo; zato poudarja, da mora ostati neodvisna, njeni sedanji temelji in načela pa se ne bi smeli spreminjati zaradi sektorske razpršenosti;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the future cohesion policy will benefit from adequate financial resources; takes the view that it must not be seen as merely an instrument for achieving the objectives of sectoral policies, since it is a Community policy offering substantial added value and has its own raison d'être: economic, social and territorial cohesion; underlines therefore that cohesion policy should remain independent and its current foundations and principles should not be modified by a sectoral dispersion;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. junija 2011 o evropski mestni agendi in njeni prihodnosti v kohezijski politiki ( 2010/2158(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 23 June 2011 on European Urban Agenda and its Future in Cohesion Policy ( 2010/2158(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti naslova XVIII,
having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Title XVIII thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 1080/2006 z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Regional Development Fund OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o prispevku kohezijske politike k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in ciljev strategije EU 2020 UL C 161 E, 31.5.2011, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on the contribution of the cohesion policy to the achievement of Lisbon and the EU2020 objectives OJ C 161 E, 31.5.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o kohezijski in regionalni politiki EU po letu 2013 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0356 .
having regard to its resolution of 7 October 2010 on EU cohesion and regional policy after 2013 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0356 .
ob upoštevanju svojega ad hoc sporočila z naslovom Spremljanje izvajanja teritorialne agende in leipziške listine – evropski akcijski program za prostorski razvoj in teritorialno kohezijo,
having regard to the ad hoc note published by the European Parliament entitled ‘Follow-up of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter: towards a European Action Programme for spatial development and territorial cohesion’,
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije „Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ ( KOM(2010)2020 ) z dne 3. marca 2010,
having regard to the Commission's Communication of 3 March 2010 on ‘EUROPE 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
ob upoštevanju petega poročila Komisije „o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji: prihodnost kohezijske politike“ z dne 9. novembra 2010,
having regard to the Commission's fifth report on ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion: the future of cohesion policy’, of 9 November 2010,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Sklepi petega poročila o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji: prihodnost kohezijske politike ( KOM(2010)0642 ),
having regard to the Commission's Communication of 9 November 2010 on the ‘Conclusions of the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion: the future of cohesion policy’ ( COM(2010)0642 ),
ob upoštevanju zbirnega poročila Komisije iz aprila 2010 o naknadni oceni programov kohezijske politike za obdobje 2000–2006, ki jih sofinancira ESRR (cilj 1 in 2) (Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2000-06 co-financed by the ERDF (Objective 1&2)),
having regard to the Commission's Synthesis report of April 2010 on the ‘Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2000-06 co-financed by the ERDF (Objective 1&2)’,
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije iz junija 2010 o naknadni oceni programov kohezijske politike za obdobje 2000–2006: pobuda Skupnosti URBAN (Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2000-06: the URBAN Community Initiative),
having regard to the Commission's report of June 2010 on the ‘Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2000-06: the URBAN Community Initiative’,
ob upoštevanju teritorialne agende Evropske unije – K bolj konkurenčni in trajnostni Evropi različnih regij („teritorialna agenda“) ter leipziške listine o trajnostnih evropskih mestih („leipziška listina“), ki sta bili sprejeti na neuradnem zasedanju sveta ministrov, pristojnih za prostorsko načrtovanje in razvoj mest, v Leipzigu 24. in 25. maja 2007,
having regard to the Territorial Agenda of the EU – Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions (‘the Territorial Agenda’) and the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities (‘the Leipzig Charter’), which were both adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning and urban development held in Leipzig on 24-25 May 2007,
ob upoštevanju „izjave iz Toleda“, ki je bila sprejeta na neuradnem zasedanju sveta ministrov, pristojnih za razvoj mest, v Toledu 22. junija 2010,
having regard to the ‘Toledo Declaration’ adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers on urban development held in Toledo on 22 June 2010,
ob upoštevanju stališča generalnih direktorjev za razvoj mest o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru, Odboru regij in Evropski investicijski banki: Sklepi petega poročila o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji: prihodnost kohezijske politike ( KOM(2010)0642 /3),
having regard to the Position of the Directors General for Urban Development on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank: Conclusions of the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion: the future of cohesion policy (COM(2010) 642/3),
ob upoštevanju sklepov evropskega vrha lokalnih oblasti v Barceloni od 22. do 24. februarja 2010 z naslovom Lokalne oblasti, protagonisti nove Evrope (Local governments, the protagonist in the new Europe),
having regard to the Conclusions of the European Summit of Local Governments held in Barcelona, 22-24 February 2010, entitled ‘Local governments, the protagonist in the new Europe’,
ob upoštevanju Konvencije županov, katere pobudnik in podpornik je Evropska komisija,
having regard to the Covenant of Mayors, as initiated and supported by the European Commission,
ob upoštevanju neodvisnega poročila, pripravljenega na prošnjo Komisije o agendi za reformo kohezijske politike (An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy) (poročilo Fabrizia Barce) (2009),
having regard to the independent report, prepared at the request of the Commission, entitled ‘An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy’ (Fabrizio Barca report) (2009).
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7-0218/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0218/2011 ),
ker je za EU značilen policentričen razvoj s številnimi različno velikimi mestnimi območji in mesti s heterogenimi pristojnostmi in viri; ker meni, da bi bilo vprašljivo zgolj na podlagi statističnih podatkov sprejeti skupno opredelitev „mestnega območja“ in izraza „mestni“ na splošno, saj je raznolikost razmer v državah članicah in regijah težko zaobjeti v enem samem izrazu, in ker meni, da je treba skladno z načelom subsidiarnosti in na podlagi skupnih evropskih kazalnikov vsakršno obvezno opredeljevanje in določanje mestnih območij prepustiti državam članicam; ker bi bilo treba preučiti, kako bi lahko s pomočjo funkcionalnega pristopa oblikovali enotno opredelitev pojma „mestni“ in tako vzpostavili podlago za jasno zakonsko opredelitev mestne razsežnosti politike EU; ker bi bila zlasti v okviru kohezijske politike koristna opredelitev mestne razsežnosti na funkcionalni podlagi,
whereas the EU can be characterised by its polycentric development and variety of different-sized urban areas and cities, which have heterogenic competences and resources; expresses the view that it would be problematic to adopt a common definition of ‘urban areas’ and of the term ‘urban’ in general, purely on a statistical basis, as it is difficult to bring under the same umbrella the diversity of situations in Member States and regions, and hence takes the view that any obligatory definition and designation of urban areas should be left to Member States, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, based on European common indicators; whereas a look should be taken into how a functional approach can lead to a standard definition of ‘urban’ and thus create the basis for a clear statutory definition of the urban dimension of Union policies; and whereas it would be useful, especially in the context of the Cohesion Policy, to have a functionally based definition of the urban dimension,
ker EU s svojimi politikami prispeva k trajnostnemu razvoju mestnih območij in ker je treba upoštevati, da je treba v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti poleg nacionalnih mestnih politik opredeliti tudi evropsko mestno politiko,
whereas the EU contributes through its policies to the sustainable development of urban areas, and whereas it should be borne in mind that, in addition to national urban policies under the principle of subsidiarity, a European urban policy should be defined,
ker mesta dejavno prispevajo k oblikovanju politik EU ter igrajo pomembno vlogo pri uspešnem izvajanju strategije Evropa 2020 in ker bi neupoštevanje mestne razsežnosti politik EU, zlasti kohezijske politike, ogrozilo doseganje ciljev Evropa 2020,
whereas cities contribute actively to the formulation of EU policies and play an important role in the successful implementation of the EU2020 Strategy; and whereas failing to take into account the urban dimension of EU policies, and especially that of cohesion policy, would jeopardise the achievement of the EU2020 goals,
ker imajo mesta edinstven arhitekturni in kulturni potencial ter veliko sposobnost za socialno vključevanje in ker prispevajo k socialnemu ravnotežju z ohranjanjem kulturne raznovrstnosti in stalne povezanosti med središčem in predmestji,
whereas cities possess unique architectural and cultural potential, as well as considerable powers of social integration, and whereas they contribute to the social balance by preserving cultural diversity and maintaining a permanent link between the centre and outlying areas,
ker so bili na podlagi izkušenj iz pobud URBAN ukrepi za razvoj mest vključeni v zakonodajni okvir za cilje konvergence ter regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja v programskem obdobju 2007-2013; ker so se sredstva, ki jih imajo mesta na razpolago, zaradi vključevanja te razsežnosti v izvajane politike očitno povečala; ker bi bilo treba v operativnih programih določiti jasno opredeljene cilje razvoja mest, da bi tako bolje usmerjali sredstva,
whereas, building on the experience of the URBAN initiatives, urban actions have been integrated (‘mainstreamed’) into the regulatory framework for the Convergence and Regional competitiveness and employment objectives in the 2007-2013 programming period; whereas this mainstreaming has clearly expanded the funding available for cities; whereas clearly defined urban development objectives should be identified within the operational programmes to help concentrate resources,
ker subsidiarnost v svoji okrepljeni in razširjeni obliki, ki jo določa PDEU, pa tudi upravljanje na več ravneh ter bolje opredeljeno načelo partnerstva predstavljajo bistvene elemente za pravilno izvajanje vseh politik EU in ker je treba temu primerno okrepiti tudi vključevanje virov ter pristojnosti lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti,
whereas subsidiarity in its strengthened and widened form, as defined in the TFEU, as well as multi-level governance and a better-defined partnership principle, are essential elements for the correct implementation of all EU policies, and whereas engagement of the resources and competences of local and regional authorities should be reinforced accordingly,
ker je gospodarska kriza v zadnjih nekaj letih povečala razlike in socialno izključenost v obsežnih območjih na obrobju velemest; ker morajo imeti lokalni organi zaradi krize možnosti za izvajanje praktičnih ukrepov za boj proti revščini ter za podporo socialni koheziji in zaposlovanju,
whereas the economic crisis of the last few years has heightened disparities and social exclusion in vast peripheral metropolitan areas; whereas, in the face of the crisis, local authorities must be in a position to implement practical measures to combat poverty and support social cohesion and employment,
ker se je politika razvojnih polov, ki je temeljila na spodbujanju gospodarske dejavnosti v mestih, večkrat izkazala za neuspešno pri ustvarjanju zadostnih spodbud, zaradi česar je imela omejen učinek na okoliška območja in ni prispevala k celovitemu razvoju,
whereas a policy of development poles based on stimulating economic activity in the cities has on many occasions failed to generate sufficient pull and has therefore had a limited impact on the surrounding area and has not contributed to integrated development,
ker lahko v manjšem številu mestnih okrožij, ne glede na bogastvo ali gospodarsko moč samega mesta, še vedno obstajajo posebne težave, kot so izjemna družbena neenakost, revščina, socialna izključenost in visoka stopnja brezposelnosti, ki jih je s podporo iz kohezijske politike mogoče ublažiti ali odpraviti,
whereas in a very few districts of cities, regardless of their wealth or economic strength, there may be specific problems such as extreme social inequality, poverty, marginalisation and high unemployment which cohesion policy support can alleviate or eliminate,
ker poenostavitve pri izvajanju politik, vključno z mehanizmi za nadzor in revizijo, prispevajo k večji učinkovitosti, zmanjšanju pogostost napak, spreminjanju strukturo politike tako, da je ta bolj prijazna do uporabnika, in povečanju njene prepoznavnosti; ker si je treba za poenostavitev prizadevati tudi v prihodnje ter to prizadevanje pospremiti s poenostavitvami nacionalnih in regionalnih postopkov, tako da se bodo predstavniki mestnih območij lažje znašli in bolje izkoriščali evropska sredstva,
whereas simplification of policy implementation, including that of control and auditing mechanisms, helps improve efficiency, reduce error rates, make the policy architecture more user-friendly and increase visibility; and whereas simplification efforts should continue and be accompanied by the simplification of national and regional procedures so that representatives of urban areas can better orient and manage the utilisation of European funds,
ugotavlja, da evropska mestna agenda na eni strani zajema mestno razsežnost politik EU, zlasti kohezijske politike, in na drugi strani niz medvladnih prizadevanj na ravni EU za koordinacijo mestnih politik med državami članicami; ta niz se oblikuje na neformalnih ministrskih srečanjih, ki jih usklajujejo zaporedna predsedstva Sveta in h katerim Komisija aktivno prispeva; v zvezi s tem meni, da bi morale biti lokalne oblasti bolje obveščene o dejavnostih medvladnega niza in bolj vključene vanje; priporoča boljše usklajevanje med obema ravnema in tesnejše vključevanje lokalnih oblasti; poudarja potrebo po boljšem usklajevanju odločitev in ukrepov upravnih organov na ravni Skupnosti in na nacionalni ravni;
Notes that the European Urban Agenda comprises on the one hand the urban dimension of EU policies, in particular cohesion policy, and on the other hand the intergovernmental strand of European-level efforts to coordinate the urban policies of Member States, the latter being implemented through informal ministerial meetings with coordination by successive Council Presidencies and the active contribution of the Commission; takes the view in this context that local governments should be better informed of, and more strongly involved in, the activities of the intergovernmental strand; recommends closer coordination between the two levels and closer involvement of local government; stresses the need to improve coordination of the decisions and actions of administrative authorities at both European and national level;
je seznanjen s sprejetjem izjave iz Toleda in referenčnega dokumenta iz Toleda o obnovi mest; se strinja s potrebo po večji kontinuiteti in usklajevanju pri sprejemanju skupnega delovnega programa ali „evropske mestne agende“; pozdravlja poudarek, ki so ga ministri namenili krepitvi sodelovanja in usklajevanja z Evropskim parlamentom, pa tudi ciljem glede krepitve mestne razsežnosti kohezijske politike in spodbujanja trajnostnega razvoja mest ter celostnega pristopa, ki jih je mogoče doseči s krepitvijo in razvojem instrumentov za izvajanje leipziške listine na vseh ravneh; čestita državam članicam in Komisiji za njihova prizadevanja glede nadaljevanja marsejskega procesa in izvajanja referenčnega okvira za trajnostna evropska mesta; z zanimanjem spremlja pričetek poskusne faze referenčnega okvira; vendar obžaluje, ker mesta v te procese niso dovolj vključena; zato Komisijo in države članice poziva, naj zagotovijo boljši pretok informacij o tem procesu mestom, ki v njem ne sodelujejo, Parlament pa naj obveščajo o nadaljnjem razvoju;
Notes the approval of the Toledo Declaration and the Toledo Reference Document on urban regeneration; agrees with the need for more continuity and coordination in moving towards a joint working programme or ‘European Urban Agenda’; welcomes the fact that ministers underlined the need to strengthen cooperation and coordination with the European Parliament, as well as the aim of strengthening the urban dimension in cohesion policy and promoting sustainable urban development and integrated approaches by reinforcing and developing instruments to implement the Leipzig Charter at all levels; congratulates the Member States and the Commission on their efforts to continue the Marseille process and implement a reference framework for sustainable European cities; follows with interest the launch of the test phase of the reference framework; regrets, however, that cities are not sufficiently involved in these processes; asks the Commission and Member States, therefore, to ensure better flow of information about this process to non-participating cities and to keep Parliament informed of further developments;
poudarja, da imajo poleg ukrepov kohezijske politike, ki veliko prispevajo k razvoju mestnih območij, močan vpliv na mestni razvoj tudi številne druge politike (kot so okoljska, prometna in energetska) in programi EU; poudarja, da je treba bolje razumeti teritorialni vpliv politik, in poziva h krepitvi mestne agende v politikah EU; znova poziva Komisijo, naj oceni teritorialni vpliv sektorskih politik ter razširi obstoječe mehanizme za oceno učinka; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja zamisli, orisane v petem poročilu o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji, in delo, opravljeno v Evropskem omrežju za opazovanje prostorskega razvoja (ESPON);
Highlights the fact that, further to the significant contribution of cohesion policy interventions to the development of urban areas, a range of other EU policies (such as environment, transport and energy) and programmes have a strong impact on urban development; stresses the need for a better understanding of the territorial impact of policies and calls for the Urban Agenda in EU policies to be enhanced; reiterates its call on the Commission to proceed with a territorial impact assessment of sectoral policies, and to extend the existing impact assessment mechanisms; welcomes in this context the ideas outlined in the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion and the work carried out by ESPON;
Lokalne potrebe in/ali prednostne naloge na evropski ravni
Local Needs and/vs. European Priorities