natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da bi desetletni večletni finančni okvir, ki ga je v pregledu proračuna predlagala Komisija, lahko zagotovil veliko stabilnost in predvidljivost za obdobje finančnega načrtovanja, vendar bo, ker bi bile skupne zgornje meje in temeljni pravni instrumenti določeni za deset let, povečal togost večletnega finančnega okvira in zelo otežil prilagajanje novim razmeram; vendar meni, da bi ciklus 5+5 lahko predvideli le, če bi bil s Svetom dosežen in v uredbo o večletnem finančnem okviru vključen dogovor o največji stopnji prilagodljivosti, vključno z obveznim vmesnim pregledom;
Notes that the 10-year MFF, as proposed by the Commission in the Budget Review, could provide substantial stability and predictability for the financial programming period but, as the overall ceilings and the core legal instruments would be fixed for ten years, it will increase the rigidity of the MFF and render the adjustments to new situations extremely difficult; considers, however, that a 5+5 cycle could only be envisaged if an agreement on a maximum level of flexibility, including an obligatory mid-term review, was reached with the Council and enshrined in the MFF regulation;
meni, da je najboljša prehodna rešitev za naslednji večletni finančni okvir do leta 2020 sedemletni ciklus, saj bi ta lahko zagotovil večjo stabilnost z zagotavljanjem kontinuitete programov v daljšem obdobju in vzpostavil jasno povezavo s strategijo Evropa 2020; vendar poudarja, da so za vse možnosti za trajanje naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira potrebna zadostna finančna sredstva ter ustrezna in s sredstvi dobro podprta prilagodljivost znotraj in izven okvira, da bi se izognili težavam, ki so se pojavile v obdobju 2007–2013;
Takes the view that for the next MFF a 7-year cycle, set until 2020, should be the preferred transitional solution as it could provide for more stability by ensuring the continuity of the programmes for a longer period, and also make a clear link with the Europe 2020 strategy; stresses, however, that all options for the duration of the next MFF are subject to sufficient funding and an adequate and well-resourced flexibility within and outside the framework to avoid the problems encountered during the 2007-2013 period;
meni, da odločitev o novem sedemletnem večletnem finančnem okviru ne bi smela izključiti možnosti odločitve za petletno ali 5+5 obdobje po letu 2021; ponavlja svoje prepričanje, da bo uskladitev finančnega načrtovanja z mandatom Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta okrepila demokratično odgovornost, dolžnost in legitimnost;
Believes that a decision on a new 7-year MFF should not pre-empt the possibility of opting for a 5 or 5+5 year period as of 2021; reiterates its conviction that a synchronisation of the financial programming with the mandate of the Commission and the European Parliament will increase democratic responsibility, accountability and legitimacy;
se v celoti zaveda težkih fiskalnih prilagoditev, ki potekajo v nacionalnih proračunih številnih držav članic in ponovno poudarja, da bi morala biti vodilna načela proračuna EU bolj kot kdaj koli prej doseganje evropske dodane vrednosti in zagotavljanje dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, učinkovitosti, uspešnosti in smotrnosti.
Is fully conscious of the difficult fiscal adjustments that many Member States are making to their national budgets and reiterates that achieving EAV and ensuring sound financial management -efficiency, effectiveness, economy- should be, more than ever, guiding principles of the EU budget;
poudarja, da ne glede na možne prihranke, proračun EU pri svoji trenutni ravni 1 % BND ne more zapolniti finančne vrzeli, ki je posledica dodatnih potreb po financiranju, ki izhajajo iz Pogodbe in obstoječih političnih prednostnih nalog ter obveznosti EU, kot so:
Emphasises that regardless of realisable savings, the EU budget, at its current overall level of 1 % of GNI, is not capable of closing the financing gap deriving from additional financing needs arising from the Treaty as well as from existing policy priorities and commitments such as:
doseganje glavnih ciljev Evropa 2020 na področju zaposlovanja, raziskav in razvoja, podnebja in energetike, izobraževanja in izkoreninjenja revščine;
the achievement of the Europe 2020 headline targets in the fields of employment, R&D, climate and energy, education and poverty reduction;
povečanje porabe za raziskave in inovacije s trenutnih 1,9 % BDP na 3 % BDP, kar pomeni povečanje v višini približno 130 milijard EUR na področju javne in zasebne porabe letno;
the increase of research and innovation spending from currently 1.9 % of GDP to 3 % of GDP, adding up to approximately EUR 130 billion of public and private spending per year;
potrebna vlaganja v infrastrukturo;
the necessary investments in infrastructure;
bistveno popolno in pregledno izračunano financiranje velikih projektov, ki jih je sprejel Svet, na primer ITER, Galileo in evropska vesoljska politika;
the essential fully-fledged and transparently calculated financing of large-scale projects adopted by the Council such as ITER and Galileo as well as the European space policy;
dodatna proračunska sredstva – ki jih še ni mogoče količinsko opredeliti – na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike, vključno z Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje in evropsko sosedsko politiko;
the not yet quantifiable additional appropriations needed in the field of Common Foreign and Security Policy, including the European External Action Service and the European Neighbourhood Policy;
potrebe po dodatnih sredstvih, povezane s prihodnjo širitvijo EU;
the additional financing needs related to the future enlargement of the EU;
financiranje obstoječega evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo in evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost po letu 2013, da bi območju evra in EU zagotovili fiskalno stabilnost, potrebno za izhod iz krize državniškega dolga;
the financing of the existing European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism and the European Stability Mechanism after 2013 in order to provide the Eurozone and the EU with the fiscal stability required in order to overcome the debt crisis;
finančna prizadevanja, povezana z doseganjem razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, da bi za razvojno pomoč porabili 0,7 % BND, torej približno 35 milijard EUR na leto dodatno k trenutni porabi v višini 0,4 % BND;
the financial effort related to the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) to spend 0.7 % of GNI on development aid, i.e. around EUR 35 billion annually further to the current spending of 0.4 % of GNI;
zaveze, ki izhajajo iz dogovorov iz Københavna in Cancuna, s katerimi se želi pomagati državam v razvoju pri boju s podnebnimi spremembami in prilagajanju na njihove učinke, ki bi morale biti nove ter dopolnjevati zaveze v okviru razvojnih ciljev tisočletja ter do leta 2020 znašati do 100 milijard dolarjev letno, od katerih bi približno tretjino morala nositi EU;
the pledges resulting from the Copenhagen and Cancun agreements aimed at helping developing countries combat climate change and adapt to its effects which should be new and additional to the commitments made under the MDG and amount by 2020 to 100 billion dollars annually around a third of which to be shouldered by the EU;
je zato trdno prepričan, da zamrznitev naslednjega večletnega finančnega ovira na ravni iz leta 2013, ki jo zahtevajo nekatere države članice, ni realna možnost; poudarja, da tudi če bi povečali raven sredstev naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira za 5 % v primerjavi z letom 2013 Raven 2013: 1,06 % BND; raven 2013 + 5 %: 1,11 % BND; oboje v sredstvih za prevzem obveznosti v stalnih cenah za leto 2013.
Is therefore of the firm opinion that freezing the next MFF at the 2013 level, as demanded by some Member States, is not a viable option; points out that even with an increase of the level of resources for the next MFF of 5% compared to the 2013 level 2013 level: 1,06 % of GNI; 2013 level + 5%: 1,11 % of GNI; both in commitment appropriations at 2013 constant prices.
Številke temeljijo na domnevi sedemletnega večletnega finančnega okvira z uporabo naslednjih načrtov prihodkov in odhodkov ter napovedi Komisije: napoved GD BUDG iz maja 2011 glede BND za leto 2012: 13.130.916,3 milijonov EUR (cene iz leta 2012); napoved GD ECFIN iz januarja 2011 glede nominalne rasti BND za 1,4 % za obdobje 2011–2013 in 1,5 % za obdobje 2014–2020.
These figures are based on the assumption of a 7 year MFF using the following estimates and forecasts by the Commission: - DG BUDG's May 2011 forecast of 2012 GNI: EUR 13.130.916,3 million (2012 prices); - DG ECFIN's January 2011 estimate of GNI nominal growth of 1,4% for 2011-2013 and 1,5% for 2014-2020.
Opomba: številke se lahko spremenijo zaradi spremembe načrta prihodkov in odhodkov ter napovedi Komisije, prav tako zaradi spremembe uporabljenega referenčnega leta in vrste cen (tekoče ali stalne).
NB: Figures are subject to change in line with variations of the Commission's estimates and forecasts as well as with the reference year and type of prices used (current or constant).
, se za doseganje dogovorjenih ciljev Unije, za obveznosti in za načelo solidarnosti Unije lahko nameni le omejen finančni prispevek; zato je prepričan, da je treba za naslednji večletni finančni okvir nameniti vsaj 5 % več sredstev; poziva Svet, naj, če se ne strinja s tem pristopom, jasno opredeli, katere od njegovih političnih prednostnih nalog ali projektov je mogoče povsem opustiti, kljub njihovi dokazani evropski dodani vrednosti;
only a limited contribution can be made to the achievement of the Union's agreed objectives and commitments and the principle of Union solidarity; is, therefore, convinced that at least a 5% increase of resources is needed for the next MFF; challenges the Council, in case it does not share this approach, to clearly identify which of its political priorities or projects could be dropped altogether, despite their proven European added value;
ponovno poudarja, da brez zadostnih dodatnih sredstev v večletnem finančnem okviru po letu 2013 Unija ne bo mogla izpolniti obstoječih prednostnih nalog politik, ki so povezane s strategijo Evropa 2020, in novih nalog iz Lizbonske pogodbe, kaj šele da bi se odzivala na nepredvidene dogodke;
Reiterates that without sufficient additional resources in the post-2013 MFF, the Union will not be able to fulfil the existing policy priorities, namely linked to the Europe 2020 strategy, the new tasks provided for by the Treaty of Lisbon, let alone respond to unforeseen events;
ugotavlja, da se zgornja meja za lastna sredstva ni spremenila vse od leta 1993; meni, da zgornja meja za lastna sredstva lahko zahteva nekatere postopne prilagoditve, saj države članice zaupajo več pristojnosti Uniji in zanjo določajo več ciljev; meni, da medtem, ko trenutna zgornja meja za lastna sredstva, ki je bila v Svetu 1,23 % celotnega BND držav članic za sredstva za plačila in 1,29 % za sredstva za prevzem obveznosti.
Notes that the own resources ceiling has been unchanged since 1993; believes that the own resources ceiling might require some progressive adjustment as Member States confer more competences on, and fix more objectives for the Union; considers that while the current ceiling of own resources set unanimously by the Council 1.23 % of the total GNI of the Member States in payment appropriations and 1,29 % in commitment appropriations
soglasno določena, zagotavlja zadosten proračunski manevrski prostor za soočanje z najnujnejšimi izzivi Unije, to še vedno ne bo zadosti za to, da bi proračun EU postal pravo orodje za evropsko gospodarsko upravljanje ali za pomemben prispevek k vlaganju v strategijo EU 2020 na ravni EU;
provides sufficient budgetary leeway to meet the most pressing Union challenges but that it would still be insufficient for the EU Budget to become a real tool for European economic governance or to contribute in a major way to investing in the Europe 2020 strategy at EU level;
Preglednejši, enostavnejši in pravičnejši sistem financiranja 166.
A more transparent, simpler and fairer financing system 166.
opozarja, da se v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo „brez vpliva na druge prihodke proračun v celoti financira iz lastnih sredstev“; poudarja, da način, kako se je sistem lastnih sredstev razvijal in prava lastna sredstva postopno nadomestil s tako imenovanimi „nacionalnimi prispevki“, nesorazmerno poudarja neto razlike med prihodki in odhodki držav članic in tako nasprotuje načelu solidarnosti EU ter slabi evropski skupni interes in v veliki meri zanemarja evropsko dodano vrednost; opozarja, da to stanje v praksi pomeni, da na velikost proračuna vplivajo finančne razmere posameznih držav članic kot tudi njihov odnos do EU; zato odločno poziva k poglobljeni reformi sredstev EU, da bi tako financiranje proračuna EU uskladili z duhom in zahtevami Pogodbe;
Recalls that according to the Treaty of Lisbon ‘without prejudice to other revenue, the budget shall be financed wholly from own resources’; stresses that the way the system of own resources has evolved, gradually replacing genuine own resources by the so-called ‘national contributions’, places disproportionate emphasis on net-balances between Member States thus contradicting the principle of EU solidarity, diluting the European common interest and largely ignoring European added value; notes that, in practice, this state of affairs means that the size of the budget is affected by the financial circumstances of individual Member States, as well as their attitude towards the EU; strongly calls, therefore, for an in-depth reform of EU resources in order to realign the financing of the EU budget with the spirit and requirements of the Treaty;
meni, da je glavni cilj reforme doseči bolj neodvisen, pravičnejši, preglednejši, enostavnejši in bolj nepristranski finančni sistem, ki bi ga državljani lahko bolje razumeli in bi lahko jasneje prispevali k proračunu EU; v tem smislu poziva k odpravi obstoječih rabatov, izjem in popravnih mehanizmov; je prepričan, da je uvedba enega ali več virov pravih lastnih sredstev za Unijo za nadomestitev sistema, ki temelji na BND, nujna, če želi Unija končno imeti proračun, s katerim lahko bistveno prispeva k finančni stabilnosti in gospodarski oživitvi; opozarja, da je treba vsako spremembo lastnih sredstev izvesti ob upoštevanju fiskalne suverenosti držav članic; s tem v zvezi vztraja, da bi Unija morala neposredno zbirati svoja lastna sredstva, neodvisno od nacionalnih proračunov;
Considers that the main aim of the reform is to achieve an autonomous, fairer, more transparent, simpler and equitable financing system, which can be better understood by the citizens, and make clearer their contribution to the EU budget; calls, in this context, for an ending of existing rebates, exceptions and correction mechanisms; is convinced that the introduction of one or several genuine own resources for the Union, in order to replace the GNI-based system, is indispensable if the Union is ever to get the budget it needs to significantly contribute to financial stability and economic recovery; recalls that any change on own resources should be implemented in compliance with fiscal sovereignty of Member States; insists, in this context, that the Union should be able to collect directly its own resources independently from the national budgets;
poudarja, da prestrukturiranje sistema lastnih sredstev kot takega ni povezano z velikostjo proračuna EU, ampak z iskanjem učinkovitejše kombinacije sredstev za financiranje sprejetih politik in ciljev EU; poudarja, da uvedba novega sistema ne bi smela povečati skupnega davčnega bremena za državljane, ampak bi morala zmanjšati obremenitev nacionalnih proračunov;
Emphasises that the restructuring of the system of own resources as such does not concern the size of the EU budget but finding a more effective mix of resources to fund the agreed EU policies and objectives; points out that the introduction of a new system would not increase the overall tax burden for citizens, but instead reduce the burden on national treasuries;
poudarja, da je Evropski parlament edini parlament, ki ima besedo na odhodkovni, ne pa tudi na prihodkovni strani; zato poudarja nujno potrebo po demokratični reformi sredstev EU;
Stresses that the European Parliament is the only parliament who has a say on the expenditures side but not on the revenues side; therefore emphasises the crucial need for a democratic reform of EU resources;
je seznanjen z morebitnimi novimi lastnimi sredstvi, ki jih je predlagala Komisija v sporočilu o pregledu proračuna (obdavčitev finančnega sektorja, dražbe v okviru sistema trgovanja z emisijami toplogrednih plinov, dajatev EU na zračni promet, DDV, energetski davek, davek od dobička pravnih oseb); pričakuje sklepe analize učinka teh možnosti, skupaj s študijo o izvedljivosti različnih možnosti za davek EU na finančne transakcije, ki bi morala preučiti tudi ustrezne mehanizme za zbiranje z namenom, da Komisija do 1. julija 2011 predstavi zakonodajni predlog;
Takes note of the potential new own resources proposed by the Commission in its Communication on the Budget Review (taxation of the financial sector, auctioning under the greenhouse gas Emissions Trading System, EU charge related to air transport, VAT, energy tax, corporate income tax); awaits the conclusions of the impact analysis of these options, including a feasibility study on the various options for an EU Financial Transaction Tax, that should also examine the relevant collection mechanisms, in view of the presentation by the Commission of a legislative proposal by 1 July 2011;
meni, da bi davek na finančne transakcije lahko predstavljal velik prispevek finančnega sektorja h kritju gospodarskih in socialnih stroškov krize in k vzdržnosti javnih financ; je mnenja, da bi davek na finančne transakcije tudi lahko delno prispeval k financiranju proračuna Unije kot tudi k zmanjševanju prispevkov držav članic na podlagi BND in da bi morala Unija dati zgled na področju prenosa finančnih sredstev v davčne oaze;
Considers that an FTT could constitute a substantial contribution, by the financial sector, to the economic and social cost of the crisis, and to public finance sustainability; is of the opinion that an FTT could also contribute partially to the financing of the EU budget, as well as to lowering Member States' GNI contributions, and that the Union should also act as an exemplar in relation to the movement of funds towards fiscal havens;
opozarja, da je na podlagi Lizbonske pogodbe za sprejetje večletnega finančnega okvira v Svetu, ki ga ta sprejme s soglasjem, potrebna odobritev Parlamenta, ki jo ta sprejme z večino svojih članov;
Recalls that, pursuant to the Treaty of Lisbon, the consent of the Parliament, given by a majority of its component members, is compulsory for the adoption of the MFF by the Council, acting unanimously;
poudarja stroge zahteve v zvezi z večino tako v Parlamentu kot tudi v Svetu in opozarja, da je treba določbo Pogodbe iz člena 312(5) PDEU v celoti izkoristiti, kar zahteva, da Parlament, Svet in Komisija sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe v celotnem postopku za sprejetje večletnega finančnega okvira; ugotavlja, da to na institucije izrecno nalaga dolžnost izvajanja posvetovanj, da se najde sporazum o besedilu, h kateremu bo Parlament dal svojo odobritev; poleg tega poudarja, da če do konca leta 2013 ne bo sprejet večletni finančni okvir, se zgornje meje in druge določbe za leto 2013 podaljšajo vse dokler se ne sprejme nov večletni finančni okvir;
Underlines the stringent majority requirements for both the Parliament and the Council and points to the importance of exploiting to the full the Treaty provision under Article 312(5) of the TFEU which requires the Parliament, the Council and the Commission, throughout the procedure leading to the MFF adoption, to take any measure necessary to this end; notes that this explicitly imposes upon the institutions the duty to carry out negotiations in order to find agreement on a text to which Parliament can give its consent; points out further that if no MFF has been adopted by the end of 2013, the ceilings and other provisions corresponding to the year 2013 shall be extended until such time as a new MFF is adopted;
pozdravlja zavezo predsedstev Sveta Pismo predsednika vlade Yvesa Letermeja predsedniku Buzeku z dne 8. decembra 2010.
Welcomes the commitment of the Council Presidencies Letter of Prime Minister Yves Leterme to President Buzek, 8 December 2010.
, da bodo zagotovila odprt in konstruktiven dialog ter sodelovanje s Parlamentom v celotnem postopku sprejetja prihodnjega večletnega finančnega okvira, ter potrjuje svojo pripravljenost za tesno sodelovanje s Svetom in Komisijo, popolnoma v skladu z določbami Lizbonske pogodbe, v tem pogajalskem procesu;
to ensure an open and constructive dialogue and collaboration with the Parliament during the whole procedure for the adoption of the future MFF and reaffirms its willingness to work in close cooperation with the Council and the Commission in full accordance with the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon during the negotiating process;
zato poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj spoštujeta Pogodbo in si prizadevata za hiter dogovor s Parlamentom o praktični metodi dela za proces pogajanj o večletnem finančnem okviru; ponovno poudarja povezavo med reformo prihodkov in reformo odhodkov ter zato zahteva trdno zavezo Sveta, da bo v kontekstu pogajanj o večletnem finančnem okviru razpravljal o predlogih o novih lastnih sredstvih;
Urges, consequently, the Council and the Commission to comply with the Treaty and to make every effort necessary to swiftly reach an agreement with the Parliament on a practical working method for the MFF negotiating process; reiterates the link between a reform of revenue and a reform of expenditure and demands, accordingly, a firm commitment by the Council to discuss in the context of the MFF negotiation the proposals on new own resources;
zahteva, da se na ravni EU začne obsežna javna razprava o namenu, področju uporabe in usmeritvi večletnega finančnega okvira Unije in o reformi njenega sistema prihodkov; predlaga zlasti, da se skliče konferenca v obliki konvencije o prihodnjem financiranju Unije, ki mora vključevati poslance Evropskega parlamenta in poslance nacionalnih parlamentov;
Demands that a wide-ranging public debate on the purpose, scope and direction of the Union's MFF and the reform of its revenue system be opened at EU level; proposes, in particular, that a Convention-type conference on the future financing of the Union be convened, which must include Members of the European Parliament as well as of national parliaments;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj posreduje to resolucijo Svetu, Komisiji ter drugim zadevnim institucijam in organom kot tudi nacionalnim vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the other institutions and bodies concerned, as well as to the national governments and parliaments of the Member States.
B7-0349 , 0350 , 0354 , 0355 in 0356/2011
B7-0349 , 0350 , 0354 , 0355 and 0356/2011
ob upoštevanju celovitega mirovnega sporazuma, podpisanega dne 9. januarja 2005,
having regard to the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) signed on 9 January 2005,
ob upoštevanju resolucije varnostnega sveta Organizacije združenih narodov št. 1978(2011),
having regard to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1978 (2011),
ob upoštevanju izjave Afriške unije z dne 31. januarja 2011,
having regard to the Declaration of the African Union of 31 January 2011,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o Sudanu z dne 31. januarja 2011 in Sklepa Sveta št. 9953/11 z dne 17. maja 2011,
having regard to the Council conclusions on Sudan of 31 January 2011 and to Council Decision 9953/11 of 17 May 2011,
ob upoštevanju izjave predsednika varnostnega sveta Organizacije združenih narodov z dne 3. junija 2011,
having regard to the UN Security Council Presidential Statement of 3 June 2011,