natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
kljub temu meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da Računsko sodišče zaradi pomanjkljivega poročanja ’ni moglo oceniti’ številnih financiranih projektov;
Finds it nevertheless unacceptable that the Court of Auditors, through a lack of proper reporting, was ’unable to assess’ a number of projects financed;
meni, da bi Unijo v vseh regionalnih organizacijah moral zastopati posebej imenovani vodja delegacije in da bi delegacije Unije morale imeti pooblastila za razpravo o članstvu v različnih regionalnih združenjih;
Takes the view that the Union should be represented in each Regional Organisation by a specifically assigned Head of Delegation and that Union Delegations should be mandated to discuss the aligning of membership in different regional groupings;
izpostavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem posebnem poročilu št. 18/2009 učinke pomoči Evropskega razvojnega sklada za regionalno gospodarsko povezovanje v Vzhodni in Zahodni Afriki, kateri je namenjen velik del, namreč več kot 50 % sredstev za regionalne programe Evropskega razvojnega sklada, ocenilo kot samo pogojno učinkovite; poziva Komisijo, naj pred začetkom postopka razrešnice za leto 2010 Parlament obvesti o ukrepih, sprejetih v odgovor na zahteve, ki jih je Parlament izrekel v svoji resoluciji z dne 5. maja 2010 UL L 252, 25.9.2010, str.
Underlines that, in its Special Report No 18/2009, the Court of Auditors assessed EDF support for regional economic integration in East Africa and West Africa, to which a considerable proportion – over 50 % – of EDF funding was allocated, as only partially effective; asks the Commission to inform Parliament about the measures being taken following the requests formulated by Parliament in its resolution of 5 May 2010 OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p.
, sprejeti k sklepom Parlamenta o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna sedmega, osmega, devetega in desetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada; prav tako bi bil vesel celotnega pregleda, iz katerega bi bilo razvidno, kateri od teh ukrepov v zadevnih regijah je bil uspešno izveden;
accompanying its Decision on discharge to the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and 10th EDFs, before the start of the discharge procedure 2010; would also welcome a complete overview showing which of these measures have been implemented effectively in the regions concerned;
priznava, da regionalno gospodarsko sodelovanje lahko ustvarja rast in delovna mesta v državah v razvoju ter s tem prispeva k zmanjšanju revščine; zato pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je financiranje iz Evropskega razvojnega sklada na tem področju v obravnavanem proračunskem obdobju povečalo za več kot dvakrat;
Acknowledges that regional economic integration can create growth and jobs in developing countries and thereby contribute to reducing poverty; welcomes, accordingly, the fact that EDF funding in this area has more than doubled over the financial period in question;
obžaluje, da podpora Evropskega razvojnega sklada regionalnemu povezovanju še vedno ni popolnoma učinkovita, zlasti zaradi pomanjkanja zmogljivosti afriških organov, prekrivanja članstva afriških regionalnih gospodarskih organizacij, kar vodi k podvajanju dela in razpršitvi virov, pa tudi zaradi neustrezne podpore in usklajevanja delegacij Komisije, kar je predvsem posledica pomanjkanja sredstev;
Regrets that EDF support for regional integration has not yet been wholly effective, mainly owing to lack of capacity on the part of the African authorities, the overlapping membership of African regional economic organisations leading to the duplication of efforts and dispersion of resources, and inadequate support and coordination from Commission Delegations, principally due to lack of resources;
v skladu s tem poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi razvoj zmogljivosti regionalnih gospodarskih organizacij in institucij Vzhodne in Zahodne Afrike, kar vključuje tudi podporo za nacionalne parlamente in lokalno civilno družbo, ter naj spodbuja konvergenco med regionalnimi bloki zaradi postopne odprave prekrivanja članstva, hkrati pa naj poskrbi za to, da se upošteva odgovornost partnerskih držav za ta proces;
Calls, accordingly, on the Commission to step up capacity-building for East African and West African regional economic organisations and their institutions, including support for national parliaments and local civil society, and to encourage convergence between regional blocs with a view to eliminating overlapping membership over time, whilst taking care to respect partner countries’ ownership of the process;
poziva Komisijo in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj delegacijam Unije zagotovita več sredstev in jim tako omogočita učinkovitejše upravljanje procesov regionalnega povezovanja, prav tako naj zagotovita boljše usklajevanje in večjo doslednost med regionalnimi in nacionalnimi programi;
Calls on the Commission and the European External Action Service to allocate more resources in order to enable Union Delegations to manage regional integration processes more effectively, and to ensure greater coordination and more coherence between regional and national programmes;
vztraja, da Unija ne bi smela izvajati pritiska na afriške države, da bi čim prej podpisale sporazume o gospodarskem partnerstvu ali privolile v to, da bi sporazumi obravnavali več vprašanj, kot si same želijo, in da Unija ne bi smela ogrožati obstoječih regionalnih skupin s podpisovanjem sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu s posameznimi državami;
Insists that the Union should not pressure African states to sign up to Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) any faster or which cover a greater range of issues than they want to, and that the Union should avoid undermining existing regional groupings by agreeing EPAs with individual countries;
vztraja, da bi morala biti dodeljena sredstva za majhne države, zlasti najmanj razvite, bolj osredotočena na trajnostni gospodarski razvoj, na primer prek mehanizmov za ustvarjanje bogastva, da se zmanjša odvisnost od regionalnih gospodarskih ’velikanov’, kot sta Nigerija in zahodna Afrika; poziva Komisijo, naj še najprej financira regionalne programe, ki se sicer imenujejo tudi programi znotraj držav AKP in vključujejo več ali vse države v posamezni regiji;
Insists that smaller states’ fund allocation, especially for the least-developed countries, should be more focused on sustainable economic development, such as through wealth creation mechanisms, so as to reduce the dependency on regional economic ’giants’, such as Nigeria in West Africa; calls on the Commission to continue its funding for regional programmes, otherwise known as Intra-ACP Programmes, which cover several or all countries in a particular region;
se ne strinja z uporabo obresti, ki so se natekle na zakladniških računih Evropskega razvojnega sklada (vključno s prenesenimi sredstvi iz obdobja 2001-2007), ki naj bi po ocenah znašale 34 000 000EUR, za izdatke za plače, ampak meni, da smejo biti uporabljene le za izdatke za projekte in programe; zahteva od Komisije, naj pojasni, kakšna je bila politika v preteklosti, in po potrebi brez odlašanja poda predloge za spremembo veljavnih predpisov v skladu s tem načelom,
Does not agree with the use of accrued interest on EDF treasury accounts (including transfers from the period 2001-2007), which is estimated at EUR 34 000 000, to cover staff expenditure but considers that it should only be used for expenditure for projects and programmes; asks the Commission to explain what the policy in the past was and, if necessary, to make proposals to amend the regulation in force in line with this principle without delay;
opominja, da se ocena Parlamenta glede proračunske podpore ne bi smela osredotočati samo na tveganja, ampak tudi na koristi, kakor tudi na tveganja in prednosti drugačne dodelitve pomoči; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi podatke o primerih, v katerih so bili zastavljeni cilji proračunske podpore doseženi, in v katerih državah prejemnicah je prišlo do posebnih težav;
Recalls that Parliament's assessment of budget support should not focus on the risks only but also on the benefits, as well as on the risks and benefits of alternative aid delivery; asks the Commission to provide information concerning those cases in which the goals set for EU budget support were accomplished and concerning recipient countries in which specific problems were encountered;
se zaveda, da je proračunska podpora kontroverzno razvojno orodje, saj omogoča nizke transakcijske stroške, povečano lastništvo in okrepljen dialog med partnerji in donatorji, hkrati pa je z njo povezano tveganje napačnih dodelitev in neželene porabe sredstev, če se upravljanje javnih financ v državah prejemnicah izkaže za premalo pregledno, odgovorno in učinkovito; poudarja, da proračunska podpora ni vedno pravi odgovor in se nanjo ne sme gledati kot na edino rešitev;
Is aware that budget support is a controversial development tool offering the advantage of low transaction costs, increased ownership and enhanced dialogue between partners and donors, while at the same time, involving the risk of misappropriation and unwanted use of funds when public finance management by recipient countries does not prove sufficiently transparent, accountable and effective; stresses that budget support is not the right answer to every situation and should not be perceived to be the sole option;
opominja, da je v skladu s členom 25 (1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 Uredba (ES) št. 1905/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja (UL L 378, 27.12.2006, str.
Recalls that, in accordance with Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation (OJ L 378, 27.12.2006, p.
proračunska podpora lahko dodeljena, če partnerska država z javnimi izdatki upravlja dovolj pregledno, zanesljivo in uspešno; v zvezi s tem izraža zaskrbljenost, da bi zaradi ’dinamične’ razlage, ki jo je Komisija podala v zvezi z merili upravičenosti, lahko prišlo do neučinkovite in neuspešne javne porabe; poziva Komisijo k nadaljnjim prizadevanjem, da bi ustrezno utemeljila svoje sklepe v zvezi z upravičenostjo do proračunske podpore in da bi vsi sporazumi o financiranju zagotavljali izčrpno in jasno osnovo za oceno spoštovanja plačilnih pogojev;
, budget support may be granted if the partner country's management of public spending is sufficiently transparent, reliable and effective; in that context, expresses its concern at the risks of inefficient and ineffective public spending that are entailed by the Commission's ’dynamic’ interpretation of the eligibility criteria; calls on the Commission to continue its efforts to substantiate its decisions concerning the eligibility of budget support and to ensure that all financing agreements provide a comprehensive and clear basis for the assessment of compliance with payment conditions;
obžaluje številne napake pri izplačilih proračunske podpore (35 %); znova poziva k preglednejšim in objektivnejšim merilom za upravičenost do proračunske podpore ter podpira priporočilo Računskega sodišča Komisiji, naj ’jasno opredeli kazalnike, cilje, metode izračuna in vire za preverjanje’ Točka 55, Letno poročilo Računskega sodišča 2009 o Evropskih razvojnih skladih.
Regrets the high level of errors in budget support payments (35 %); reiterates its call for more transparent and objective eligibility criteria for budget support, and supports the Court of Auditors’ recommendation for the Commission to ’clearly specify the indicators, targets, calculation methods and verification sources’ Point 55, Court of Auditors’ Annual Report 2009 on the EDFs.
; poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi revizije ter nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme ter naj spremlja in poroča o obsegu izpolnjevanja teh meril v skladu z določbami člena 25(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006;
; calls on the Commission to intensify audits and supervisory and control systems and to monitor and report back on the extent to which these criteria are being met, in line with the provisions of Article 25(1)(b) Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006;
pozdravlja objavo zelene knjige o prihodnosti proračunske podpore EU za tretje države ( KOM(2010)0586 ), vendar obžaluje, da Komisija kljub predhodnim pozivom Parlamenta ni oblikovala letnega poročila o uporabi proračunske podpore, ki bi vključevalo koristne, celostne, zanesljive, analitične in ovrednotene informacije o načrtovani in izplačani proračunski podpori, doseganju pričakovanih rezultatov, ki so bili določeni v ciljih donatorjev in v strategijah držav, obstoju in kakovosti dopolnilnih pogojev, učinkovitosti dialoga, stanju uskladitve donacij, izvedenem dopolnilnem zagotavljanju zmogljivosti in učinku le-tega, izboljšanju sistemov držav, odgovornosti institucij, institucijah upravljanja javnih financ ter institucijah za spremljanje in ocenjevanje, znesku in stopnji nepravilnih odhodkov in o analizi tipologije nepravilnosti, ki so bile ugotovljene med kontrolami in revizijami (sistemske in nesistemske);
Welcomes the publication of the green paper on the future of EU budget support to third countries ( COM(2010)0586 ) but deplores the fact that, despite previous calls by Parliament, the Commission has failed to draw up an annual report on the use of budget support, including useful, comprehensive, reliable, analytical and evaluative information on planned and disbursed budget support, achievement of expected results as set out by donor objectives and country strategies, existence and quality of complementary conditions, the effectiveness of the dialogue, the state of donor harmonisation, the complementary capacity building which has taken place and the effect of that capacity building, achievement of improved country systems, accountability institutions, public finance management institutions, monitoring and evaluation institutions, the amount and rate of irregular expenditure, and an analysis of the typology of irregularities (systemic and non-systemic) brought to light by controls and audits and remedial action taken;
poudarja, da je vloga Parlamenta pri proračunski podpori zagotoviti, da Komisija prevzame odgovornost za rezultate porabe, in da je proračunska podpora instrument pomoči, ki zahteva drugačen način nadzora, in sicer prehod z golega nadzora nad vloženimi viri na preverjanje rezultatov v primerjavi s kazalniki, s čimer bi zagotovili, da bodo sredstva pomoči koristila prebivalstvu države prejemnice;
Recalls that Parliament's role as regards budget support is to hold the Commission accountable for the results of spending, and that budget support is an aid instrument which requires a paradigm shift in oversight behaviour, moving from mere control over inputs to the checking of results against indicators, thus ensuring that support spending benefits the population of the recipient country;
meni, da bi morala Komisija pri reviziji smernic o proračunski podpori posebno pozornost nameniti nadzornim in kontrolnim sistemom; pričakuje, da bo Komisija okrepila nadzor in letno poročanje o skladnosti z merili upravičenosti; ponovno opozarja, da morajo biti projekti razvijanja zmogljivosti v okviru dejavnosti proračunske podpore podvrženi enakemu nadzornemu in kontrolnemu sistemu kot vsi drugi projekti, kjer se opravlja revizija;
Considers, within the scope of the revision of the guidelines on budgetary support by the Commission, that particular attention must be given to supervisory and control systems; expects the Commission to strengthen the monitoring and annual reporting on the compliance with the eligibility criteria; recalls that capacity building projects within the scope of budgetary support operations are subject to the same supervisory and control system as any other project, which includes audits;
izpostavlja pomembno povečanje deleža, ki se v kumulativnih sklepih o financiranju nanaša na proračunsko podporo in strukturno prilagoditev v desetem Evropskem razvojnem skladu, v primerjavi z osmim in devetim Evropskim razvojnim skladom; izraža zaskrbljenost nad tem razvojem dogodkov;
Recalls that under the Tenth EDF, as compared with the Eighth and Ninth EDFs, there was a significant increase in the share of cumulative financing decisions accounted for by budget support and structural adjustment; expresses its concern about this development;
opozarja, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem letnem poročilu o Evropskem razvojnem skladu za proračunsko leto 2009 ugotovilo, da je bilo pri plačilih za proračunsko podporo veliko število količinsko neopredeljivih napak in da v poročilih delegacij o oceni upravljanja javnih financ niso bila pojasnjena merila za oceno napredka […], dosežen napredek in razlogi, zakaj program reforme morda ni bil izveden po načrtu vlade prejemnice Točka 25, Letno poročilo Računskega sodišča 2009 o Evropskih razvojnih skladih.
Recalls that the Court of Auditors found in its Annual Report on the EDFs, concerning the financial year 2009 that budget support payments were affected by a high frequency of non-quantifiable errors and that ’[t]he main explanation was that the Delegations’ public finance management assessment reports did not explain the criteria against which progress had to be assessed […], the progress made and the reasons why the reform programme may not have been implemented according to the recipient Government's plan’ Point 25, Court of Auditors’ Annual Report 2009 on the EDFs.
; vztraja, naj Komisija plačila proračunske podpore ocenjuje še strožje in v prihodnje racionalizira postopke izplačil;
; urges the Commission to evaluate the budget support payments with even greater rigour and to tighten up its payment procedures from now on;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo v posebnih pogojih za spremenljive tranše, ki temeljijo na uspešnosti, jasno določeni kazalniki, cilji, metode izračuna in viri za preverjanje ter da bodo poročila delegacij vsebovala strukturiran in formaliziran prikaz napredka pri upravljanju javnih financ, tako da bodo v njih jasno navedena merila za oceno napredka, dosežen napredek in razlogi, zakaj program reforme morda ni bil izveden po načrtu;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the specific conditions for performance-based variable tranches clearly specify the indicators, targets, calculation methods and verification sources and that Delegations’ reports provide a structured and formalised demonstration of public finance management progress by clearly setting the criteria against which progress was to be assessed, the progress made and the reasons why the reform programme may have not been implemented according to plan;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe za boj proti korupciji v državah prejemnicah, in sicer prek vzdrževanja tesnega dialoga o vprašanjih korupcije s partnerskimi vladami in naj s proaktivnim delovanjem zagotovi vzpostavitev ustreznih sistemov in razpoložljivost sankcij, če je to potrebno; meni, da je treba ponovno razmisliti o zagotovitvi sredstev, če sodelovanje ni obojestransko in če ni možno dobiti nobenega zagotovila glede osnovne učinkovitosti sistemov za obravnavo korupcije;
Calls on the Commission to take all necessary measures in order to combat corruption in the beneficiary states, through maintaining a close dialogue with partner governments on corruption issues and, by taking a pro-active approach, to ensure that the appropriate systems are in place and that sanctions are available when necessary; believes that the provision of funds should be reconsidered if such cooperation is not forthcoming and if no guarantee as to the basic effectiveness of the systems to tackle corruption can be obtained;
ponavlja svoje stališče, da je sodelovanje nacionalnih parlamentov, civilne družbe in lokalnih organov v partnerskih državah nujno potrebno za doseganje resnične odgovornosti za proces, in poziva Komisijo, naj stori vse za izboljšanje dialoga s temi organi v vseh fazah postopka načrtovanja;
Reiterates its opinion that the involvement of national parliaments, civil society and local authorities in partner countries is indispensable in order to achieve genuine ownership of the process and repeats its call on the Commission to make every effort in order to improve dialogue with these bodies at all the different stages of the programming process;
poziva Komisijo, naj partnerskim državam pomaga pri razvoju zmogljivosti za parlamentarni nadzor in revizije ter pri vključitvi nacionalnih parlamentov in lokalnih partnerjev civilne družbe k pripravi nacionalnih razvojnih strategij;
Urges the Commission to help partner countries develop parliamentary control and audit capacities and to involve national parliaments, as well as local civil society partners, in drawing up their national development strategies;
poziva svoje pristojne odbore, naj vzpostavijo neposredne stike s sestrskimi odbori iz parlamentov afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav prejemnic, da se spodbudi in podpre njihova vloga pri zagotavljanju učinkovitosti podpore s parlamentarnimi nadzornimi dejavnostmi;
Invites its relevant committees to establish direct contacts with their sister committees in the parliaments of the recipient ACP countries in order to encourage and support their role in ensuring the effectiveness of aid through parliamentary oversight activities;
poziva Komisijo, naj v tretjih državah zagotovi večjo prepoznavnost dejavnosti, ki se financirajo s sredstvi Unije;
Urges the Commission to ensure better visibility for Union-funded activities overseas;
potrjuje svoje prepričanje, da bi morali biti na splošno razvojna pomoč in zlasti proračunska podpora vezani tudi na predhodno izjavo o razkritju, ki jo izda vlada države prejemnice in jo podpiše njen finančni minister, o izbranih vprašanjih, ki vplivajo na strukturo upravljanja in odgovornosti vsake države prejemnice;
Recalls once more its view that development aid in general and budget support in particular should be tied to an ex-ante disclosure statement, issued by the recipient country's government and signed by its finance minister, concerning selected issues that affect the governance and accountability structure of a beneficiary country;
izraža izjemno zaskrbljenost, ker se število prostih delovnih mest v delegacijah v tretjih državah obravnava kot ’kritično tveganje’ Točka 40, Letno poročilo Računskega sodišča 2009 o Evropskih razvojnih skladih.
Is extremely concerned that vacancy rates in third-country Delegations are considered as a ’critical risk’ Point 40, Court of Auditors’ Annual Report 2009 on the EDFs.
in ker kadrovske omejitve, pomanjkanje osebja in velike menjave uslužbencev Komisijo precej ovirajo pri učinkovitem izvrševanju sredstev iz Evropskega razvojnega sklada, zlasti kar zadeva vodenje projektov, usposabljanje, spremljanje ter zanesljive in pravočasne revizije; zato pričakuje, da bo Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje določila kot svojo prednostno nalogo, da se vsem delegacijam zagotovi ustrezna raven kvalificiranega osebja, zlasti strokovnjakov na področju razvoja;
and that resource constraints, staff shortages and high staff turnover significantly hamper the Commission's effective implementation of EDF funds, in particular as regards project management, training, monitoring, and reliable and timely audits; consequently expects the European External Action Service to make it a priority to equip all Delegations with adequate levels of qualified staff, notably experts in the field of development;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče kljub ugotovitvi, da so bile predhodne kontrole, ki jih izvajajo odredbodajalci v osrednjih službah EuropeAid, uspešne, prišlo do zaključka, da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi EuropeAid le delno uspešno zagotavljali pravilnost plačil;
Regrets that, although the ex-ante controls by authorising officers in EuropeAid's central services were assessed by the Court of Auditors as effective, it concluded that EuropeAid's supervisory and control systems were only partially effective in ensuring that payments are regular;
opominja Komisijo, da bi moral EuropeAid:
Reminds the Commission that: