natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja tradicionalno vlogo države kot izvajalca socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, vendar domneva, da bo odprtje prostora za zasebne izvajalce povečalo dostopnost in kakovost storitev ter izbiro za uporabnike;
Emphasises the traditional role of the state as provider of social services of general interest, yet considers that opening up this sector to private service providers will enhance the accessibility and quality of services and increase consumer choice;
potrjuje svoje zavzemanje za sodobne in kakovostne socialne storitve splošnega pomena, s katerimi se uresničujejo številne vrednote evropskega projekta, kot so enakost, solidarnost, vladavina prava in spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva, pa tudi načel dostopnosti, univerzalnosti storitev, učinkovitosti, smotrnega upravljanja sredstev, kontinuitete, bližine uporabnikom in preglednosti;
Reaffirms its commitment to modern, high-quality SSGI, which are a means of giving effect to many of the values embodied in the European project, such as equality, solidarity, the rule of law and respect for human dignity, as well as to the principles of accessibility, universal service, efficiency, economical management of resources, continuity, proximity to service users and transparency;
Regulativne omejitve pri zagotavljanju socialnih storitev splošnega pomena
Regulatory constraints on delivery of SSGI
poudarja, da nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi, ki izvajajo ali dodeljujejo pooblastila za izvajanje socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, potrebujejo jasno pravno podlago za svoje storitve in izdatke ter da so storitev obveščanja in pojasnjevanja ter nedavno objavljen vodič Komisije dobrodošli, vendar ne zagotavljajo potrebne pravne varnosti, kar ponudnike teh storitev ovira pri opravljanju njihove naloge;
Stresses that national, regional and local authorities engaged in providing or mandating SSGI need legal certainty for their services and expenditures, and that, while the information and clarification service and the recently published Commission guide are very welcome, they do not deliver the necessary legal certainty, which tends to inhibit SSGI providers in fulfilling their mission;
poudarja, da so državni in lokalni organi odgovorni za zagotavljanje pravilnega delovanja socialnih storitev splošnega pomena in za ohranjanje visoke ravni kakovosti;
Stresses that national and local authorities are responsible for ensuring that SSGI operate properly and for maintaining a high standard of quality;
meni, da je neučinkovito in z vidika demokracije nesprejemljivo, da rezultati oblikovanja zakonodaje, kot jih trenutno interpretira Sodišče Evropske unije, zahtevajo razsojanje o mejah pravil enotnega trga, kar zadeva storitve splošnega pomena, vključno s socialnimi storitvami splošnega pomena, kar jasno kaže na pomanjkanje pravne varnosti; opozarja na dolgotrajen dialog z zainteresiranim stranmi v zvezi s tem in poziva Komisijo, naj končno začne ukrepati;
Considers that it is neither efficient nor democratically acceptable that current interpretation of legislation results in the ECJ being asked to adjudicate on the limits of single market rules with regard to SGI, including SSGI, which is a clear indication of the lack of legal certainty; points to the long-standing and ongoing stakeholder dialogue on this matter and calls on the Commission finally to take action;
poudarja, da so socialne storitve splošnega pomena nujno potrebna naložba za gospodarsko prihodnost Evrope in da so v nekaterih državah članicah pod velikih pritiskom zaradi gospodarske in bančne krize ter vladnih programov varčevanja, ki še povečujejo potrebo po njih; socialne storitve splošnega pomena so nepogrešljive kot avtomatični socialnoekonomski stabilizator v času krize, predvsem prek sistemov socialne varnosti;
Emphasises that SSGI are an indispensable investment for Europe's economic future, and that they are under severe pressure in some Member States as a result of the economic and banking crises and government austerity programmes, which are resulting in even greater demand for them; SSGI have been indispensable as automatic socio-economic stabilisers during these crises – notably via social security systems;
poudarja, da potreba po socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena v sedanjem ozračju negotovosti, povezanem z rastjo in zaposlovanjem, neprestano raste, obenem pa demografski razvoj prinaša nove potrebe; poudarja, da je trenutno največji izziv na področju zagotavljanja socialnih storitev splošnega pomena ohranjanje njihove kakovosti in obsega ter glede na njihov pomen in nujnost krepitev teh storitev, da bi zagotovili izpolnjevanje njihove pomembne vloge pri doseganju socialnih in gospodarskih ciljev strategije EU 2020 na področju zaposlovanja in zmanjševanja revščine;
Stresses that the need for SSGI is steadily growing owing to the current climate of uncertainty over growth and jobs, while demographic change is giving rise to new needs; emphasises that the key challenge of the moment for the delivery of SSGI is maintaining their quality and scope and, given their importance and absolute necessity, that such services need to be enhanced in order to ensure they play their important role in achieving the EU 2020 social and economic targets for employment and poverty reduction;
poudarja, da gospodarska in finančna kriza ter varčevalne politike, ki jih uvajajo države članice, ne smejo odvračati od naložb v socialne storitve splošnega pomena, temveč je treba te storitve uskladiti prav zaradi pomembnosti in nujnosti za potrebe ljudi;
Points out that the economic and financial crisis and the austerity policies imposed by Member States should not encourage disinvestment in SSGI but that, on the contrary, given their importance and absolutely essential nature, such services need to be consolidated in order to meet people's needs;
poudarja, da je pomembno, da nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi zagotovijo socialna stanovanja ženskam, ki jih potrebujejo ali jim grozi socialna izključenost, ter tistim, ki so bile žrtve nasilja na podlagi spola, predvsem če imajo mladoletne otroke;
Draws attention to the importance of ensuring that the national, regional and local authorities facilitate access to social housing for women in need or at risk of exclusion, and for women who have been the victims of gender violence, in both cases especially when they have dependent children;
poudarja, da je treba nameniti večje priznanje delu, ki ga opravljajo zaposleni na področju socialnih storitev, med katerimi je večina žensk, saj je njihovo delo težko in zahteva skrbeč odnos ter veliko osebno predanost, v družbi pa ne velja za prestižno;
Points to the need for greater recognition to be given to the work performed by people employed in the social services sector, the majority of whom are women, because their jobs are difficult, call for a caring attitude and great personal commitment and are not very socially prestigious;
meni, da načelo solidarnosti in krepitev Evropske unije terjata, da se kriza in z njo povezano povečevanje brezposelnosti in revščine rešujeta z učinkovitejšo in uspešnejšo rabo sredstev iz proračuna na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni, in sicer z okrepitvijo strukturnih skladov in zlasti Evropskega socialnega sklada ter z uporabo novih virov, kot so projektne obveznice;
Considers that the principle of solidarity and the strengthening of the European Union require that the crisis, with its growth in unemployment and poverty, must be addressed by greater efficiency and effectiveness of spending at EU and national levels, strengthening of structural funds and, in particular, the European Social Fund, and the application of new resources such as project bonds;
meni, da morajo vlade držav članic za zagotavljanje visokokakovostnih socialnih storitev splošnega pomena oblikovati ustrezen finančni okvir za socialne storitve splošnega pomena, ki bo zagotovil stalnost storitev s stabilnim financiranjem, poleg tega pa dostojne delovne pogoje ter usposabljanje za zaposlene v tem sektorju ter za tiste, ki pomagajo pri zagotavljanju teh storitev;
Believes that in order to guarantee delivery of high-quality SSGI, Member State governments need to provide for an adequate financial framework for SSGI, which guarantees continuity of services with stable financing, as well as decent working conditions and training for those employed or assisting in delivering the services;
poudarja, da mora vsak prenos pristojnosti z držav članic, regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti na socialne storitve splošnega pomena predvideti mehanizem za usklajevanje, ki bi preprečeval razlikovanje v kakovosti storitev, ki jih izvajajo na različnih območjih, nujno pa ga mora spremljati tudi prenos sredstev, ki omogoča nadaljnje izvajanje visokokakovostnih storitev, ki so splošno dostopne ter učinkovito izpolnjujejo pravice in potrebe uporabnikov;
Stresses, furthermore, that all transfers of competence for SSGI from Member States to local or regional authorities require the introduction of coordination arrangements, in order to avoid any disparities in the quality of the services provided in the various areas, and must go hand in hand with the transfer of the resources required to ensure the continued provision of high-quality universal services that can respond to the rights and needs of users in an effective manner;
meni, da velja splošno evropsko soglasje, da so socialne storitve splošnega pomena nujno potrebne za blaginjo narodov in uspešno gospodarstvo ter da je bil pri obravnavanju težav, s katerimi se soočajo ponudniki pri zagotavljanju in oblikovanju socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, vendar da znotraj Komisije in Sveta ter med njima še ni dogovora o izvajanju praktičnih ukrepov za preseganje ovir, s katerimi se srečujejo zainteresirane strani;
Believes there is a broad European consensus that SSGI are essential to the well-being of our peoples and an efficient economy and that while there has been some progress in addressing the difficulties that arise for providers in the delivery and development of SSGI from the application of EU rules to such services, there is no consensus so far within or between the Commission and the Council on the implementation of further practical measures to overcome the obstacles identified by stakeholders;
poudarja, da so EU in države članice pogodbeno obvezane oblikovati socialno tržno gospodarstvo in ohraniti evropski socialni model; poudarja, da se lahko države članice in lokalne oblasti same odločijo, kako bodo financirale in zagotavljale socialne storitve splošnega pomena, namreč neposredno ali kako drugače, pri tem pa lahko izrabijo vse razpoložljive možnosti, vključno z načini, ki nadomeščajo javne razpise, da bi zagotovili, da bodo socialni cilji doseženi in jih ne bo ovirala uporaba tržnih pravil za netržne storitve; poudarja potrebo po spodbudnem okolju, ki zagotavlja kakovost, dostopnost, cenovno dostopnost in učinkovitost pri zagotavljanju storitev, obenem pa ponudnikom omogoča lažje oblikovanje pobud za napovedovanje javnih potreb;
Underlines that the Treaties commit the EU and Member States to developing a social market economy and maintaining the European social model; emphasises that it is for Member States and local authorities freely to decide how SSGI are funded and delivered, whether directly or otherwise, using all available options, including alternatives to tendering, so as to ensure that their social objectives are achieved and are not hampered by the application of market rules to non-market services; stresses the need for a supportive environment that promotes quality, accessibility, affordability and efficiency in the delivery of the services, while facilitating the development by providers of a capacity for initiative that can enable them to anticipate public needs;
poudarja, da mora kakovost storitev temeljiti na rednem in celostnem posvetovanju z uporabnikom, saj mora storitev najprej in predvsem zadovoljiti njegove potrebe;
Emphasises that the quality of services must be based around regular and integrated consultation of users since services must first and foremost meet their needs;
je seznanjen s svojo izjavo z dne 10. marca 2011 o pripravi evropskega statuta za vzajemne družbe, združenja in fundacije in s potrebo po večji prepoznavnosti akterjev socialnega gospodarstva, vključno z modeli, kot so zadruge, ki so dejavne pri zagotavljanju socialnih storitev splošnega pomena ter pri organizaciji in delovanju socialnega gospodarstva; poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi ocene učinka na nacionalni ravni in na ravni EU sprejme potrebne ukrepe ter pripravi predloge za evropski statut za združenja, vzajemne družbe in fundacije, ki bi jim omogočil nadnacionalno delovanje;
Takes note of its Declaration of 10 March 2011on the establishment of European statutes for mutual societies, associations and foundations and the need for greater recognition for social economy actors, including models such as cooperatives, which are active in the provision of SSGI and the organisation and functioning of the social economy, calls on the Commission to take the necessary steps, based on impact assessments at national and EU level, to introduce proposals for European statutes for associations, mutual societies and foundations, which would enable them to operate on a transnational basis;
pozdravlja pregled državne pomoči, ki ga je sprožil komisar Almunia, in poziva k pojasnitvi osnovnih načel nadzora nad državno pomočjo za povečanje pravne varnosti in preglednosti, da bi pojasnili pojme, kot sta akt o pooblastitvi in javne oblasti, uvedli diferenciacijo pravil, izračunali nadomestilo obveznosti javne storitve, pri čemer je treba med drugim upoštevati socialna merila, posebne lastnosti ponudnika storitve in številne zunanje dejavnike pri zagotavljanju storitev, kot je socialna dodana vrednost in udeležba skupnosti;
Welcomes the review of state Aid which Commissioner Almunia has undertaken and calls for clarification of basic principles on the control of state aid to enhance legal certainty and transparency for clarity of concepts such as ‘act of entrustment’ and ‘public authorities’; for the introduction of differentiation in the rules; for calculating compensation of public service obligations, that should take account of, among other things, social criteria, the specific features of the service provider and a number of external considerations relating to the provision of services, such as social added value and community involvement;
pozdravlja oceno Komisije o učinku svežnja Monti-Kroes 2005; poziva k reviziji tega svežnja, da bi okrepili pravno varnost, poenostavili pravila, kot na primer o nadzoru prevelikega plačila operaterjem socialnih storitev splošnega pomena na lokalni ravni, in izboljšali prožnost njihove uporabe ter ponovno preučili možnost širitve seznama odstopanj od obveščanja v skladu s primeri bolnic in socialnih stanovanj; poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno oceni ustrezno raven praga de minimis, ki velja za socialne storitve splošnega pomena, in naj predlaga sistem, ki bo upošteval BDP držav članic pri izračunu tega praga; tako bi bil prag izračunan posebej za vsako državo članico, s tem pa bi preprečili izkrivljanje konkurence, ki ga povzroča sedanji enotni vseevropski prag; poziva, naj se nadzor nad prekomernimi nadomestili izvaja samo, če se ugotovi tveganje resne kršitve konkurence;
Welcomes the Commission evaluation of the impact of the 2005 Monti-Kroes package; calls for the revision of that package so as to strengthen legal security, simplify the rules such as those on the control of over-compensation for operators of SSGI at local level and improve flexibility in their application, and consider expanding the list of derogations from notification in line with the examples of hospitals and social housing; calls on the Commission to reassess the appropriate level of the de minimis threshold applicable to SSGI and to propose a system which takes into account Member State GDP in calculating the de minimis threshold, so that a specific de minimis threshold can be calculated for each Member State, thus preventing distortions of competition caused by the existence of a uniform, EU-wide threshold; urges that control of over-compensation be used only if the risk of serious violation of competition is ascertained;
opozarja, da na to, ali se dejavnosti subjekta, ki opravlja storitev, štejejo za gospodarske ali negospodarske, ne vplivajo niti sektor niti njegov status, niti način njegovega financiranja, temveč narava dejavnosti in njen preventivni učinek;
Points out that neither the sector, the status of an entity carrying out a service nor the way in which it is funded determines whether its activities are deemed economic or non-economic, but rather the nature of the activity itself and its preventive effect;
opozarja, da ključno vprašanje ni razlikovanje med gospodarskimi in negospodarskimi storitvami splošnega pomena, ampak vzpostavitev jasne odgovornosti javnih organov pri javnih razpisih za storitve, da bi zagotovili predvsem izvedbo nalog splošnega pomena, ki so bile dodeljene podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje teh storitev;
Recalls that the key issue is not to distinguish between economic and non-economic SGI, including SSGI, but rather to establish clearly the responsibility of public authorities, in procuring a service, to ensure that particular general interest tasks which have been assigned to undertakings entrusted with the operation of such services are carried out;
v okviru sedanje zakonodaje EU poziva k pojasnitvi konceptov in meril za klasifikacijo, uporabljenih za razlikovanje med gospodarskimi in negospodarskimi socialnimi storitvami splošnega pomena, ter k skupni opredelitvi storitev splošnega pomena, da bi zagotovili doseganje njihovega namena;
In the framework of current EU legislation, calls for clarification of the concepts and the classification criteria used to differentiate between economic and non-economic SSGI, and for a common understanding of SGI with a view to ensuring that their intended aims can be achieved;
priznava velik pomen vzajemnega učenja in izmenjave dobrih praks pri navdihovanju in spodbujanju nadaljnjega posodabljanja socialnih storitev splošnega pomena v različnih državah članicah ter poziva Komisijo k nadaljnjemu dejavnemu spodbujanju in podpiranju takih dejavnosti, vključno z usposabljanjem regionalnih in lokalnih organov pri uporabi predpisov EU v zvezi s socialnimi storitvami splošnega pomena; poudarja, da težave, ki so jih opredelili izvajalci in uporabniki socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, terjajo hitre rešitve, ki temeljijo na pragmatičnem pristopu;
Recognises the high value of mutual learning and good practice exchange in inspiring and promoting the further modernisation of SSGI in different Member States, and urges the Commission to continue proactively to initiate and support such activities with, and including training for, regional and local authorities in the application of EU rules to SSGI; stresses that the problems which SSGI providers and beneficiaries have identified need prompt solutions based on a pragmatic approach;
poziva, naj Komisija kot nadaljnji ukrep po sporočilu iz leta 2007 o storitvah splošnega pomena in sedanjemu pregledu pravil o javnih naročilih in državni pomoči, sprejme program reform, prilagoditve in pojasnitve ter tako podpre in prizna specifične netržne značilnosti socialnih storitev splošnega pomena in s tem zagotovi popolno skladnost ne samo z določbami enotnega trga, temveč tudi s socialnimi obveznostmi pogodb;
Urges that the Commission, as a follow-up to the 2007 communication on SGI and the current review of procurement and state aid rules, undertake a programme of reform, adaptation and clarification to support and recognise the specific non-market characteristics of SSGI, to ensure full conformity not only with single market provisions but also with the social obligations of the Treaties;
meni, da okvirna uredba EU o storitvah splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ki je dopustna v skladu s členom 14 PDEU, v tem trenutku ni osrednjega pomena;
Considers that an EU framework regulation on SGEI, permissible under Article 14 TFEU, is not the central issue at this time;
meni, da je odbor za socialno zaščito bistveno prispeval k skupnemu razumevanju in vlogi socialnih storitev splošnega pomena in bo s tem tudi nadaljeval; vendar ugotavlja, da mu njegov mandat v skladu s pogodbo (člen 160 PDEU) določa samo svetovalni status in ne omogoča razširitve njegovega članstva tako, da bi bilo mogoče vključiti civilno družbo, Evropski parlament, socialne partnerje in druge;
Considers that the Social Protection Committee has made and will continue to make an important contribution to the common understanding and role of SSGI; notes, however, that its Treaty mandate (Article 160 TFEU) specifies a purely advisory status and does not permit its membership to be broadened to include civil society, the European Parliament, the social partners or others;
predlaga ustanovitev delovne skupine na visoki ravni, ki jo bo sestavljalo več zainteresiranih skupin, v skladu s predlogom tretjega foruma o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena, ki bo odprta, prilagodljiva in transparentna, v kateri bodo široko zastopane zainteresirane strani ter bo osredotočena na doseganje reform, kot so politične pobude, opredeljene v tem poročilu in pripadajočih mnenjih, v priporočilih tretjega foruma o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena, v drugem polletnem poročilu Komisije in v poročilih Odbora za socialno zaščito, kot tudi v vseh drugih relevantnih predlogih, ki se pojavijo; predlaga, da delovni skupini sopredsedujeta Evropski parlament in komisar, pristojen za socialne zadeve, ter da skupino sestavljajo predstavniki Parlamenta, pristojni komisarji, Svet, socialni partnerji in organizacije civilne družbe, ki predstavljajo uporabnike in ponudnike socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, Odbora regij, lokalnih organov in drugih zadevnih zainteresiranih strani, Delovna skupina bi lahko:
Proposes the establishment of a high-level multi-stakeholder working group as recommended by the 3rd SSGI Forum, which is open, flexible and transparent, broadly representative of stakeholders and focused on achieving reforms such as the policy initiatives identified in this report and the opinions thereto, in the 3rd SSGI Forum recommendations, the Commission's second Biennial Report and the SPC reports, as well as any other relevant proposals as they arise; proposes that the working group be co-chaired by the European Parliament and the Commissioner responsible for Social Affairs and comprise representatives of the Parliament, relevant Commissioners, the Council, the social partners and civil society organisations representing users and providers of SSGIs, the Committee of the Regions, local authorities and other relevant stakeholders, The working group could:
preučila relativne prednosti ustanovitve evropskega informacijskega centra za socialne storitve splošnega pomena, katerega naloga bi bila zbiranje informacij iz različnih virov v državah članicah in omogočanje izmenjave dobrih praks s področja socialnih storitev splošnega pomena na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni;
consider the relative merits of establishing a European Observatory or Resource Centre for SSGI to collect information from various sources in the Member States and to enable the exchange of good SSGI practice at the national, regional and local level;
si prizadevala za doseganje širšega konsenza glede korakov v zvezi s pojasnitvijo pravnih nejasnosti in dvoumnosti glede socialnih storitev splošnega pomena;
seek to achieve broad consensus on steps to clarify legal obscurities and ambiguities regarding SSGI.
ocenila, ali je treba predpise evropskega enotnega trga, ki imajo negativen učinek na zagotavljanje socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, preoblikovati tako, da bodo upoštevali in podpirali pristojnosti držav članic pri opredelitvi, financiranju in opravljanju socialnih storitev splošnega pomena, ob upoštevanju sedanje revizije predpisov, ki jo izvaja Komisija;
evaluate whether European single market regulations which impact negatively on SSGI provision need to be redesigned so as to respect and support Member States' responsibilities in the definition, funding and delivery of SSGI, taking account of the current Commission review of rules;