natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker mora nov zagon privesti tudi do opredelitve nove paradigme za strateška partnerstva EU, nova in stara, na osnovi skupnih univerzalnih vrednot, kot so spodbujanje demokracije, spoštovanje človekovih pravic, temeljnih svoboščin, pravne države, mednarodnega reda, ter medsebojnih koristi, interesov in skupnega razumevanja svetovne varnosti,
whereas the new momentum also needs to lead to the definition of a new paradigm for the EU's strategic partnerships, both new and old, and whereas this should be based on shared universal values such as the drive for democracy, respect for human rights, basic freedoms, the rule of law and international law, as well as on mutual benefits, interests and a common understanding of global security,
ker je parlamentarni nadzor zunanje politike EU bistvenega pomena, če naj državljani EU razumejo in podpirajo evropsko zunanje delovanje; ker nadzor povečuje legitimnost teh ukrepov; ker morajo organizacijo in spodbujanje učinkovitega ter rednega medparlamentarnega sodelovanja v EU skupaj opredeliti Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti, v skladu s členoma 9 in 10 protokola 1 k Lizbonski pogodbi,
whereas parliamentary scrutiny of EU foreign policy is essential if European external action is to be understood and supported by EU citizens; whereas the scrutiny enhances the legitimacy of this action; whereas the organisation and promotion of effective and regular inter-parliamentary cooperation within the EU must be jointly determined by the European Parliament and national parliaments, in accordance with Articles 9 and 10 of Protocol 1 to the Lisbon Treaty,
Letno poročilo Sveta za leto 2009 o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki
The Council's 2009 annual report on the CFSP
pozdravlja letno poročilo Sveta in izreka pohvalo njegovi preglednosti in tematsko usmerjeni strukturi, ki zagotavlja jasen pregled politik in delovanja na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike; pozdravlja tudi željo Sveta, da bi se bolje osredotočil na regionalni okvir konfliktov in vprašanj; vendar obžaluje dejstvo, da poročilo ne vključuje morebitnih pristopov k reševanju teh konfliktov in vprašanj;
Welcomes the Council's annual report and commends its transparent and theme-driven structure, which provides a clear overview of policies and actions in the field of the common foreign and security policy; welcomes also the Council's ambition to place further emphasis and a stronger focus on the regional context of conflicts and issues; regrets, however, the fact that no possible approaches to resolving those conflicts and issues are outlined in the report;
poziva Svet, naj ne omejuje obsega letnega poročila o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki zgolj na opise njenih dejavnosti, temveč naj ga oblikuje kot orodje, usmerjeno v politiko in rešitve; meni, da bi poročilo moralo zagotoviti več kot zgolj katalog dogodkov in razvoja v državah ter bi moralo obravnavati tudi vprašanje učinkovitosti zunanje politike EU in sredstev, ki so potrebna za uresničevanje ciljev zunanjega delovanja EU; poziva Svet, naj v poročilo vključi tudi oceno usklajevanja in povezanosti SZVP z drugimi zunanjimi politikami Unije ter prav tako strateška in organizacijska priporočila za prihodnost na podlagi ocen ukrepov v okviru SZVP;
Calls on the Council not to limit the scope of the CFSP annual report to a mere description of CFSP activities but make it a policy- and solution-focused tool; takes the view that the report should provide more than a catalogue of country-based events and developments and should also address the question of the effectiveness of the EU foreign policy as well as of the means necessary to pursue the objectives of European external action; calls on the Council to also include in the report an evaluation of the coordination and coherence between the CFSP and other external policies of the Union as well as include strategic and organisational recommendations for the future on the basis of the assessment of CFSP actions;
meni, da bi letno poročilo o SZVP moralo temeljiti na novem institucionalnem okviru, ki ga je zagotovila Lizbonska pogodba, in služiti kot instrument za okrepljen medinstitucionalni dialog, zlasti z razpravo o izvajanju strategije zunanje politike EU, ocenjevanjem njene učinkovitosti in orisom njene prihodnje smeri;
Believes that the annual report on the CFSP should be based on the new institutional framework created by the Lisbon Treaty and serve as an instrument for enhanced interinstitutional dialogue, notably by discussing the implementation of an EU foreign policy strategy, evaluating its effectiveness and outlining its future direction;
ponovno poudarja svoje stališče, ki je naklonjeno razvoju skladne strategije zunanje politike EU, zasnovane na ciljih in načelih, določenih v členu 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), ki bi morala jasno opredeliti interese EU na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike; poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj uporabi vsa svoja pooblastila, da sproži, uresničuje in zagotavlja skladnost s SZVP, ter v ta prizadevanja v celoti vključi ustrezne organe Parlamenta;
Reiterates its position in favour of developing a coherent EU foreign policy strategy, based on the objectives and principles established in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which should clearly identify the common foreign and security policy interests of the EU; calls on the Vice-President/High Representative (VP/HR) to use to the full her powers to initiate, implement and ensure compliance with the CFSP, involving Parliament's relevant bodies fully in that endeavour;
poudarja, da je treba okrepiti usklajenost med Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje (ESZD), Komisijo in državami članicami pod vodstvom podpredsednice/visoke predstavnice; poziva k izboljšanju sinergije med EU in nacionalno ravnjo ter okrepitvi usklajevanja med različnimi institucionalnimi akterji za boljše povezovanje vseh ustreznih instrumentov in politik ter za posredovanje enotnega sporočila EU o osrednjih političnih vprašanjih; meni, da je sodelovanje na vseh ravneh med ESZD, ustreznimi organi in odbori Evropskega parlamenta ter zadevnimi službami Komisije bistvenega pomena za oblikovanje strateškega pristopa EU do njene soseščine ter do držav kandidatk, morebitnih držav kandidatk in partnerskih držav, pa tudi do področij politik, kot so spodbujanje človekovih pravic in demokracije, trgovina, razvoj, energetska varnost ter pravosodje in notranje zadeve;
Stresses the need to enhance coherence between the European External Action Service (EEAS), the Commission and the Member States under the leadership of the VP/HR; calls for improved synergies between the EU and the national level and that coordination be enhanced between the various institutional actors, with a view to better integrating all relevant instruments and policies and delivering a single EU message on key political issues; considers cooperation at all levels between the EEAS, the relevant bodies and committees in the European Parliament and the respective services in the Commission to be essential to enable the EU to develop a strategic approach to the EU's neighbourhood and to candidate, potential candidate and other partner countries, as well as to other policy areas such as human rights and democracy promotion, trade, development, energy security and justice and home affairs;
pričakuje, da bo ESZD s spodbujanjem tesnejšega usklajevanja med SZVP in drugimi zunanjimi politikami pomagala okrepiti vlogo in vpliv EU na svetovni ravni ter ji omogočila učinkovitejšo projekcijo interesov in vrednot na način, ki bo v skladu z njenim zdajšnjim statusom v mednarodni trgovini in gospodarstvu; poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj vzpostavi potrebne strukture in mehanizme za usklajevanje znotraj ESZD;
Expects the EEAS, by promoting closer coordination between the CFSP and other external policies, to help strengthen the EU's role and influence on the global stage and enable it to project its interests and values more efficiently, in a manner commensurate with its existing international trade and economic status; calls on the VP/HR to set up the necessary coordination structures and mechanisms inside the EEAS;
ugotavlja pa, da bo za doseganje celovite povezanosti in učinkovitosti skupne politike EU poleg ustanovitve ESZD predvsem potrebna politična volja držav članic EU, da presežejo svoje različne poglede na osrednja vprašanja zunanje politike; zato meni, da je bistvenega pomena, da se države članice EU sporazumejo o skupni strategiji za zunanjo in varnostno politiko ter da s svojimi nacionalnimi politikami podpirajo stališča EU;
Notes, however, that parallel to setting up the EEAS, the achievement of full coherence and efficiency of the EU common policy will require, first and foremost, the political will of the EU Member States to overcome their differing outlooks on key foreign policy issues; considers it essential, in this regard, that EU Member States not only agree on a common strategy for foreign and security policy, but also ensure that their national policies are supportive of EU positions;
v zvezi s tem obžaluje, da so izjave posameznih predstavnikov ali skupin držav članic EU večkrat ustvarile vtis neenotnosti in zelo otežile delo podpredsednice/visoke predstavnice; zato poziva države članice, naj se vzdržijo takih posameznih in neusklajenih dejanj in izjav ter prispevajo k učinkoviti in prepoznavni SZVP; po drugi strani poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj jasno izraža stališča EU, naj se hitro in odločno odziva ter zagotovi jasno in konkretno vlogo SZVP;
Regrets that in several cases statements by individual or groups of EU Member States left the impression of disunity and made the work of the VP/HR particularly difficult; invites, therefore, the Member States to refrain from such individual and uncoordinated actions and statements and to contribute to an effective and visible CFSP; asks on the other hand the VP/HR to make the positions of the EU clearly heard, to react quickly and visibly, and to give the CFSP a clear and specific profile;
poudarja, da mora vloga posebnih predstavnikov EU (PPEU) na splošno zastopati in usklajevati politiko EU do regij s posebnimi strateškimi ali varnostnimi interesi za EU, ki zahtevajo stalno navzočnost in prepoznavnost EU; meni, da je treba vzpostaviti tesno usklajevanje med posebnimi predstavniki EU in ustreznimi oddelki ESZD ter da bi bilo treba ponovno preučiti pomembna tematska vprašanja, s katerimi so se pred tem ukvarjali osebni predstavniki, in pripraviti predloge, v skladu s katerimi bi to vlogo prevzeli visoki uslužbenci ESZD ali posebni predstavniki EU; meni, da je bistvenega pomena, da se o vlogi in mandatih posebnih predstavnikov EU izvedejo predhodna posvetovanja s Parlamentom ter da se v skladu s členom 36(1) PEU podajo predlogi o postopkih in pristojnostih, po katerih bi posebni predstavniki EU s svojimi predstavitvami in poročili seznanili tudi Parlament;
Stresses that the role of EU Special Representatives (EUSRs) should generally be to represent and coordinate EU policy towards regions with specific strategic or security interests for the EU which require a continuous EU presence and visibility; takes the view that close coordination must be established between the EUSRs and the relevant EEAS departments and that important thematic issues, previously covered by Personal Representatives, should be reconsidered and proposals put forward for this role to be taken over by high-ranking EEAS officials or EUSRs; considers it essential that defining the role and mandates of EUSRs be made subject to prior consultation of Parliament and that proposals be put forward, in accordance with Article 36(1) of the TEU, on the procedures and remit for the briefings and reports to be made available to Parliament by EUSRs;
opozarja na svojo posebno pravico iz Pogodbe, da je vključen v posvetovanja na področjih SZVP in SVOP, da se njegova mnenja ustrezno upoštevajo in da daje priporočila; poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj združi posvetovalne in poročevalske naloge, ki sta jih doslej na področju zunanjega delovanja izvajala Komisija in Svet; poziva Svet, naj sprejme konstruktiven pristop v okviru spravnega odbora za instrumente zunanje pomoči, vključno z instrumentom za stabilnost, in prizna pravico Evropskega parlamenta do demokratičnega nadzora strateških dokumentov in večletnih akcijskih načrtov v skladu s členom 290 PDEU;
Recalls its Treaty prerogative to be consulted in the CFSP and CSDP spheres, have its views duly taken into account and make recommendations; calls on the VP/HR to consolidate the consultation and reporting duties carried out to date by the Commission and the Council in the area of external action; asks the Council to adopt a constructive approach in the framework of the conciliation committee for the external assistance instruments, including the Instrument for Stability, by recognising the European Parliament's right to democratic scrutiny of strategy papers and multiannual action plans, as established in Article 290 of the TFEU;
poudarja, da mora revidirani medinstitucionalni sporazum iz leta 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju zagotavljati boljšo preglednost proračunskega postopka SZVP ter ustrezno obravnavati zahteve za informacije proračunskega organa, da bi bil ta organ v celoti in redno obveščen o okoliščinah, okviru in finančnih posledicah političnih odločitev na tem političnem področju; meni, da mora Evropski parlament pred sprejetjem mandatov in strategij na področju SZVP prejeti ustrezne informacije; pozdravlja podporo, ki jo je podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica izrekla predlogu, da morajo biti vse pomembne misije SVOP opredeljene v proračunu; glede tega meni, da je treba za zagotavljanje popolne preglednosti in demokratičnega nadzora vsaki posamezni misiji nameniti ločeno proračunsko vrstico; ponovno izraža svoje stališče, da bi se bilo treba za povečanje demokratične legitimnosti SZVP s pristojnimi organi Parlamenta posvetovati pred začetkom misij SVOP, zlasti pa bi morali imeti možnost primernega spremljanja teh misij; poudarja, da je treba za izpolnjevanje meril verodostojnosti in samoopredelitve v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo zagotoviti zadostna proračunska sredstva za doseganje ciljev SZVP;
Stresses that the revised 2006 Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management must provide for more transparency in the CFSP budgetary procedure and properly address the information requirements of the budgetary authority in order for that authority to be fully and regularly informed on the background, context and financial implications of political decisions in this policy area; takes the view that the European Parliament should receive adequate information prior to the adoption of mandates and strategies in the CFSP sphere; welcomes the support expressed by the VP/HR for the proposal that all important CSDP missions should be identified in the budget; believes, in this regard, that full transparency and democratic scrutiny require separate budget lines for each and every mission; reiterates its position that, in order to enhance the democratic legitimacy of the CFSP, Parliament's competent bodies should be consulted prior to the launch of CSDP missions and should be able properly to monitor CSDP missions in particular; emphasises that in order to fulfil the criteria of credibility and self-definition in the Lisbon Treaty, adequate budgetary resources need to be allocated to CFSP objectives;
meni, da morajo redne posvetovalne seje o SZVP dopolnjevati dodatni sestanki, če bi se pokazala potreba po predhodnih informacijah; glede tega predlaga, da bi morale biti seje usmerjene tudi v pridobivanje osrednjega strateškega in politično-vojaškega znanja, da bi izboljšali načrtovanje in upravljanje prihodnjih misij in pomagali razviti pristop vnaprejšnjega načrtovanja prihodnjih potreb; opozarja tudi na svojo pravico do posvetovanja in do ustreznega obveščanja o nujnem financiranju določenih pobud, sproženih v okviru SZVP v skladu s členom 41(3) PEU;
Considers that the regular joint consultation meetings on the CFSP should be complemented by additional meetings to be held should the need arise to provide ex ante information; suggests, in this regard, that the meetings should also be geared to learning key strategic and politico-military lessons in order to improve the planning and management of future missions and help develop a forward-looking approach to future needs; recalls, further, its right to be consulted and the need for it to be adequately informed about urgent financing arrangements for certain initiatives launched under the CFSP in line with Article 41(3) of the TEU;
v skladu z dogovorom o ustanovitvi in delovanju ESZD, doseženim na štiristranskih pogovorih v Madridu, in v skladu s finančno uredbo, kot je bila spremenjena glede ESZD, podpira oblikovanje proračunskih postavk v proračunu za leto 2011, namenjenih trem največjim misijam v okviru SZVP/SVOP; meni, da bo ta izboljšana opredelitev misij povečala preglednost in odgovornost SZVP/SVOP ter služila interesom EU; poudarja, da opredelitev večjih misij SZVP/SVOP ne sme škodovati informacijam in preglednosti v zvezi z misijami manjšega obsega, ki so politično manj prepoznavne;
Supports, in line with the agreement reached by the quadrilogue in Madrid on the setting-up and functioning of the EEAS, and in line with the Financial Regulation as modified regarding the EEAS, the creation in the 2011 budget of budget items dedicated to the three major missions conducted under CFSP/CSDP; believes that this improved identification of missions will increase both the transparency and accountability of CFSP/CSDP and serve the interests of the EU; stresses that the identification of major CFSP/CSDP missions must not be detrimental to information and transparency concerning missions of smaller extent and lesser political visibility;
kljub vsemu meni, da je nova nomenklatura minimalni pogoj in le prvi korak k podrobnemu proračunu za SZVP, ki bo omogočal celovit pregled in spremljanje misij, ki se izvajajo v okviru te politike; meni, da nova nomenklatura ne bo ogrozila nepogrešljive prožnosti proračuna SZVP in tudi ne stalnosti delovanja misij, ki že potekajo;
Considers, nevertheless, this new nomenclature as a minimum prerequisite and only a first step towards a fully detailed CFSP budget which would allow a complete overview and follow-up of the missions conducted under this policy; is of the opinion that such a new nomenclature will jeopardise neither the indispensable flexibility of the CFSP budget nor the continuity of action for missions already engaged;
opozarja na duh Pogodbe o delovanju EU, v skladu s katero naj bi soodločanje postalo splošni postopek, kar po analogiji vodi k odpravi posebnih določb in postopkov, ki so veljali za nekatere instrumente ali politike v skladu s prejšnjo pogodbo in medinstitucionalnim sporazumom; potrjuje, da so določbe, ki omejujejo prožnost financiranja SZVP, zdaj brez osnove; poudarja, da mora v skladu z zgoraj navedenim in za okrepitev učinkovitosti in odgovornosti SZVP, medinstitucionalne odnose končno voditi nova kultura dialoga, medsebojnega zaupanja in izmenjave informacij tako v fazi opredeljevanja kot tudi v fazah izvajanja in naknadnega ocenjevanja;
Recalls the spirit of the TFEU, which aims to make codecision the general procedure and which, by analogy, leads to the lifting of specific clauses or procedures that had applied to some instruments or policies under the previous Treaty and the Interinstitutional Agreement; confirms hereby that the provisions restricting the flexibility of the financing of the CFSP are now groundless; underlines that, in line with the above and in order to enhance the efficiency and accountability of the CFSP, a new culture of dialogue, reciprocal trust and exchange of information should finally pervade interinstitutional relations, both in the defining phase and in the conducting and a posteriori assessment phases;
poudarja, da je treba med prihodnjim razmislekom o večletnem finančnem okviru 2014–2020 izvesti temeljito analizo dolgoročnih finančnih zahtev skupne zunanje in varnostne politike;
Underlines that, in the context of future reflections on the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020, a thorough analysis of the financial requirements of the CFSP in the long term needs to be conducted;
ponavlja svoje stališče, da je treba v skladu s členom 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pridobiti mnenje/soglasje Evropskega parlamenta za vse mednarodne sporazume, tudi tiste, ki so povezani predvsem s SZVP, razen za tiste, ki so povezani izključno s SZVP, kakor tudi, da je treba v skladu s členom 218(10) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije Parlamentu zagotoviti popolne informacije v začetni, pogajalski in končni fazi postopka, ki vodi v sklepanje mednarodnih sporazumov; pričakuje, da bo podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica zagotovila vse ustrezne informacije o pogajanjih med celotnim postopkom, vključno s pogajalskimi smernicami in osnutki pogajalskih besedil, in opozarja, da se je v izjavi o politični odgovornosti glede zaupnih dokumentov SZVP zavezala k uporabi določil okvirnega sporazuma o mednarodnih sporazumih; poziva k oblikovanju učinkovitega načina delovanja, ki bo združeval upoštevanje posebnih pravic Parlamenta z ustrezno stopnjo zaupnosti; meni, da je za urejanje dostopa poslancev do zaupnih dokumentov potreben celovit sporazum, ki bo vključeval vse institucije in zajemal vse organe EU;
Reiterates its position that, in accordance with Article 218(6) of the TFEU, the opinion/consent of the European Parliament is required for all international agreements, including those related mainly to CFSP, with the sole exception of those related exclusively to CFSP: in accordance with Article 218(10) of the TFEU, full information must be provided to Parliament at the initial, negotiating and final stages of the procedure leading to the conclusion of international agreements; expects the VP/HR to provide all relevant information about the negotiations throughout the procedure, including negotiating directives and draft negotiating texts, and recalls that in the declaration on political accountability the VP/HR committed herself to applying the provisions of the Framework Agreement on international agreements with regard to confidential CFSP documents; calls for the establishment of an efficient modus operandi that combines respect for Parliament's prerogatives with the necessary degree of confidentiality; believes that a comprehensive agreement involving all the institutions and covering all EU bodies is required in order to regulate access to confidential documents by Members of Parliament;
opozarja na svojo obveznost v skladu s Pogodbo, da skupaj z nacionalnimi parlamenti določa organizacijo in spodbujanje učinkovitega in rednega medparlamentarnega sodelovanja, zlasti na področju skupne zunanje, varnostne in obrambne politike; meni, da je obžalovanja vredno, da še ni bil sklenjen sporazum o načinu nadaljevanja te naloge; vztraja, da bi njegovo lastno zastopstvo v kakršni koli novi obliki medparlamentarnega sodelovanja moralo biti v obliki, ki odraža obseg in pomen njegove vloge v zunanjih zadevah, ter na tej podlagi ponavlja svojo pripravljenost, da doseže sporazum z nacionalnimi parlamenti, ki bo pomenil resnično okrepitev parlamentarne razsežnosti Evropske unije kot svetovnega akterja;
Notes its Treaty obligation to determine, together with national parliaments, the organisation and promotion of effective and regular interparliamentary cooperation, in particular in the field of the common foreign, security and defence policy; finds it regrettable that there is as yet no agreement on how to take this exercise forward; insists that its own representation in any new form of interparliamentary cooperation should be of a size which reflects the range and importance of its role in external affairs and, on this basis, reiterates its willingness to reach an agreement with national parliaments that will result in a real enhancement of the parliamentary dimension of the European Union as global actor;
Osrednja tematska vprašanja SZVP
Main CFSP thematic issues