natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da je Komisija v letu 2009 sicer precej povečala znesek izterjanih neupravičenih stroškov, a so se podobno povečali tudi neizterjani zneski, saj so se skoraj potrojili na 31 500 000 EUR;
Notes that while the Commission substantially increased the amount of ineligible costs recovered during 2009, the outstanding recoverable amounts showed a similar increase and have almost tripled to EUR 31 500 000;
meni, da je zaupanje javnosti na področju raziskav, energetike in prometa izredno pomembno, ker se predvideva, da se bo v prihodnjih letih delež proračuna Unije zanj povečal;
Considers that public trust in the area of research, energy and transport is very important, since this area is anticipated to increase its share of the Union budget in the coming years;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo neodvisni revizorji, ki so nepravilno potrdili izkaze stroškov, seznanjeni z merili upravičenosti za povračilo predloženih stroškov ter, če je ustrezno, zanje odgovarjajo, pregleda delovanje sistema za certificiranje metodologije obračunavanja stroškov upravičencev, zmanjša zaostanek pri izterjavi neupravičeno izplačanih zneskov ter po potrebi uvede sankcije, dodatno poenostavi pravila za financiranje raziskav za znatno izboljšanje dostopa malih in srednjih podjetij do financiranja raziskav in zagotovi popolno odgovornost za pravilno uporabo denarja Unije;
Invites the Commission to ensure that the independent auditors who have incorrectly certified cost statements are made aware of the eligibility criteria for declared costs and if applicable held accountable, to review the operation of the system for the certification of beneficiaries’ costing methodologies, to reduce the backlog in recovering undue amounts paid and to impose sanctions where necessary, to further simplify the research funding rules, to significantly improve access to research funding for SMEs and to ensure full accountability for the proper use of Union money;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija začela uporabljati sankcije na področju raziskav (34 ukrepov, prejetih 514 330 EUR); kljub temu podpira ugotovitev službe za notranjo revizijo, da je potreben močan mehanizem za odkrivanje goljufij;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has started to make use of its sanctions in the area of research (34 actions, EUR 514 330 received); nevertheless, supports the IAS conclusion that a strong fraud detection mechanism is needed;
prav tako poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo imela služba za notranjo revizijo enaka pooblastila za organe, ki jih je ustanovila Unija, ki imajo status pravne osebe in prejemajo prispevke iz proračuna (skupna podjetja Unije), kot jih ima za službe Komisije v skladu s členom 185(3) finančne uredbe;
Further invites the Commission to ensure that the IAS exercises the same powers over the bodies set up by the Union having a legal personality and receiving contributions from the budget (Union Joint Undertakings) as those which it exercises over Commission departments, in accordance with Article 185(3) of the Financial Regulation;
verjame, da bi moral 8. okvirni program temeljiti na koreniti spremembi stališč, vključno z uvedbo sistema bonusov, ki bi delno zamenjal sedanji sistem vnaprejšnjih plačil, in boljšim dostopom do tveganega kapitala za povečanje učinkovitosti;
Believes that the FP8 should be based on a radical change of view including the introduction of a bonus system partially replacing the current upfront payment system and better access to venture capital in order to enhance efficiency;
Zunanja pomoč, razvoj in širitev – 6 600 000 000 EUR
External aid, Development and Enlargement - EUR 6 600 000 000
opozarja, da večino odhodkov s tega političnega področja neposredno centralizirano upravljajo službe Komisije, bodisi iz centrale Komisije ali na ravni delegacij Unije (po začetku veljavnosti Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ’delegacije Evropske unije’); poleg tega opozarja na vse pogostejšo rabo skupnega upravljanja, na primer pri instrumentu za hrano;
Recalls that the majority of the expenditure in this policy area is subject to direct centralised management by Commission services either from Commission Headquarters or at the Union Delegations level (’European Union Delegations’ after the entry into force of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union); further takes note of the increasing use of joint management in, for example, the Food Facility;
meni, da je učinkovitost teh področij porabe, ne zgolj posameznih projektov, treba oceniti glede na splošni trend napak;
Considers that the effectiveness of the spending areas themselves, not just individual projects, must be evaluated on its overall trend of errors;
ugotavlja, da je po ocenah Računskega sodišča najverjetnejša stopnja napak na tem revidiranem področju med 2 % in 5 %;
Notes that the most likely error rate estimated by the Court of Auditors for the audited domain is between 2 % and 5 %;
opaža tudi, da je Računsko sodišče v skupni oceni nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov ugotovilo, da so le delno učinkoviti;
Further notes that the Court of Auditors’ overall assessment of supervisory and control systems is that they are only partially effective;
je prav tako seznanjen z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča, da letno poročilo o dejavnosti in izjava, ki jo je podal generalni direktor EuropeAid, le delno pošteno ocenjujeta pravilnost finančnega poslovodenja;
Also notes that the Court of Auditors found that the Annual Activity Report and the declaration given by the Director General for EuropeAid only give a partially fair assessment of financial management in relation to regularity;
ugotavlja, da je ocena sistemov upravljanja in nadzora v državah kandidatkah in potencialnih državah kandidatkah, postopek, ki teče, in je bil določen v načrtu za decentralizirano upravljanje instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, v skladu s katerim Komisija preda pristojnosti za izvajanje določene komponente, programa ali ukrepa znotraj instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč;
Notes that the assessment of management and control systems in the candidate and potential candidate countries is an ongoing process carried out within the framework set out by the roadmap for the decentralised management process for an Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA) that leads to the granting of management powers by the Commission to a specified component, programme or measure within the IPA;
poziva Komisijo, naj tesno sodeluje z državami kandidatkami in potencialnimi državami kandidatkami, da bi učinkovito izboljšala sisteme upravljanja in nadzora, spodbujala najboljšo prakso v boju proti goljufijam in zagotovila, da so njihove prakse skladne z vsemi pravili in standardi Unije;
Asks the Commission to closely cooperate with candidate and potential candidate countries in order to effectively improve management and control systems, to promote best practices for fighting fraud, and to ensure that their practices are in conformity with all Union rules and standards;
obžaluje dejstvo, da se v nekaterih potencialnih državah kandidatkah ob imenovanjih v javni upravi nadaljujejo kršitve zakonodaje o javnih uslužbencih; obžaluje tudi, da sodstvo v veliko primerih ne deluje dobro; poziva Komisijo, naj omogoči vsem potencialnim državam kandidatkam potrebno strokovno znanje in izkušnje ter institucionalno znanje, s katerim se bodo lahko uspešno borile proti korupciji in bodo lahko nadaljevale potrebne reforme;
Deplores the fact that in some potential candidate countries appointments in the public administration in breach of the civil service law continue; regrets that the judiciary in many cases functions poorly; invites the Commission to provide all potential candidate countries with the necessary know-how and institutional knowledge to efficiently fight corruption and continue the reforms needed;
je zaskrbljen zaradi visoke stopnje zavrnitev v državah z decentraliziranim izvajanjem, in sicer tam, kjer delegacije Unije predhodno preverjajo dokumentacijo javnih naročil; poudarja, da imajo nacionalni organi v teh državah domnevno težave pri izvedbi odločilnih izboljšav, ki so potrebne za opustitev predhodnega preverjanja s strani Komisije; poziva Komisijo in države kandidatke, naj izboljšajo dialog in zagotovijo učinkovito sodelovanje;
Is concerned by the high rejection rates in countries with decentralised implementation, i.e. where Union Delegations control procurement files ex-ante; underlines that national authorities in those countries seem to have difficulties in implementing decisive improvements which are necessary for waiving the Commission's ex-ante controls; invites the Commission and candidate countries to improve dialogue and ensure effective cooperation;
je seznanjen s posebnim poročilom Računskega sodišča št. 12/2009 o uspešnosti projektov Komisije na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev za Zahodni Balkan;
Notes the Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 12/2009 on the effectiveness of the Commission's projects in the area of Justice and Home Affairs for the Western Balkans;
pozdravlja pozitivno oceno Računskega sodišča o nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemih, ki se uporabljajo na področju humanitarne pomoči; kljub temu poziva Komisijo, naj posveti več pozornosti spremljanju pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je odkrila med revizijami izvajalskih partnerjev in pri nadzoru, v kolikšnem obsegu se uporabljajo preskrbni centri humanitarne pomoči, in pri tem pridobi kar največ izkušenj;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors’ positive assessment on the supervisory and control systems applied in the area of humanitarian aid; nevertheless, invites the Commission to give greater attention to and derive full benefit from the follow-up of weaknesses revealed by its audits on implementing partners and monitoring the extent of the use of humanitarian procurement centres;
poziva naslednika GD RELEX, naj izpopolni svojo metodologijo naknadnega nadzora in se hitro posveti s tem povezanim priporočilom internega revizorja;
Invites the successor of DG RELEX to complete its ex-post control methodology and promptly address related recommendations made by the internal auditor;
poziva GD ELARG, naj razvije in vzpostavi mehanizme za lažjo analizo in spremljanje rezultatov opravljenih misij preverjanja ter naj nameni dovolj sredstev analizi nerešenih končnih izjav iz predpristopnega obdobja držav članic, ki so se pred kratkim pridružile Uniji;
Invites DG ELARG to develop and put in place mechanisms to facilitate the analysis and follow-up of the results of the verification missions carried out and to devote sufficient resources to the analysis of the outstanding final declarations submitted by the Member States that have recently joined the Union, but relating to the pre-accession period;
poziva GD ECHO, naj izboljša ocenjevanje dokumentacije predlogov za ukrepe humanitarne pomoči (na primer z uvedbo standardiziranih ocenjevalnih poročil) in naj o svojih izkušnjah pri izvajanju instrumenta za hrano poroča v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2010;
Invites DG ECHO to improve the assessments of the proposals’ documentation for humanitarian aid actions (such as the introduction of standardised evaluation reports) and to report on its experience with the implementation of the Food Facility in its Annual Activity Report for 2010;
ugotavlja, da bi lahko imelo zagotavljanje pomoči tujini tudi negativne vplive, na primer kadar podkupljivi režimi v državah prejemnicah slabo upravljajo sredstva, in da je treba absolutno prednost posvetiti preprečevanju teh vplivov;
Notes that there could also be negative effects in providing foreign aid, such as when corrupt regimes in receiving countries mismanage funds, and that the work to prevent such effects must be given top priority;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija med letoma 2007 in 2010 namenila 396 000 000 EUR podpori prizadevanjem za izboljšanje pravosodnih sistemov in boju proti korupciji v kandidatkah za pristop, ter napredek, ki je bil pri tem dosežen; kljub temu svari pred prevelikim optimizmom in Komisijo poziva, naj priskrbi dokaze, da je bil ta denar porabljen učinkovito, ter jo sprašuje, ali je zaradi izboljšane nadzorne strukture dejansko prišlo do več sankcij proti podkupljivim akterjem, tudi v odmevnih primerih, ali se zakoni v celoti izvajajo ter ali imajo reforme podporo;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission spent EUR 396 000 000 between 2007 and 2010 to support accession candidates in their efforts to improve judicial systems and the fight against corruption as well as the progress made in this regard; nevertheless cautions against being too optimistic and asks the Commission to provide evidence that this money was spent efficiently and whether improved control structures actually lead to increased sanctions against corrupt actors, including in high-profile cases, whether laws are fully implemented, and whether reforms are sustained;
z zaskrbljenostjo se seznanja s pomanjkljivostmi v decentraliziranem izvajalskem sistemu na Hrvaškem in v Turčiji, ki jih je odkrilo Računsko sodišče; poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o vseh ukrepih, sprejetih za odpravo tega problema, in naj zagotovi oceno tveganih odhodkov;
Notes with concern the weaknesses identified by the Court of Auditors in the decentralised implementation system (DIS) in Croatia and Turkey; asks the Commission to report on all measures taken to address this problem and provide estimates of the amount of expenditure at risk;
poziva Komisijo, zlasti GD ELARG, naj pospeši prizadevanja v zvezi s končnimi izjavami za program PHARE, program CARDS in prehodni vir ter naj te programe preudarno in pravočasno zaključi;
Asks the Commission, and in particular DG ELARG, to step up its efforts to deal with the final declarations for the PHARE programme, the CARDS programme, and the transition facility and to proceed with the closure of these programmes prudently and in a timely manner;
obžaluje dejstvo, da se precejšen del predpristopne pomoči obravnava v poglavju 3 (kmetijstvo – 254 000 000 EUR) in poglavju 4 (kohezija – 65 000 000 EUR) letnega poročila Računskega sodišča; je presenečen, ker v letnem poročilu Računskega sodišča v nasprotju s preteklimi leti ni podatkov o revizijskih obiskih za vsako državo nečlanico Unije posebej;
Regrets the fact that a significant share of pre-accession aid is dealt with in chapters 3 (agriculture - EUR 254 000 000) and 4 (cohesion - EUR 65 000 000) of the Court of Auditors’ annual report; is surprised that, unlike in previous years, the Court of Auditors’ annual report does not contain information on audit visits per country for non-Union countries;
obžaluje dejstvo, da GD REGIO leta 2009 ni opravil nobenega revizijskega obiska na Hrvaškem, kljub temu, da so pri postopkih javnih razpisov v tej državi velike težave;
Regrets the fact that DG REGIO did not undertake any audit missions to Croatia in 2009 despite there being major problems with the tendering process there;
prav tako poziva Komisijo, naj obvesti mednarodne organizacije, da bo pomoč Unije v prihodnje pogojena s predložitvijo dokazila o zanesljivosti v obliki izjave o zanesljivosti;
Further invites the Commission to inform international organisations that future Union assistance will be subject to the delivery of assurance evidence in the form of a statement of assurance;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj navede razloge, zakaj je pri preizkušanju transakcij v poglavju zunanje pomoči navedlo relativno nizko stopnjo napak (13 %) ter velik delež količinsko neopredeljivih napak na ravni delegacij Unije in zakaj ni dokazov o napakah pri točnosti ali dejanskosti na področju, ki je po svoji naravi zelo izpostavljeno zlorabi sredstev; poziva Komisijo, zlasti delegacije Unije, naj zagotovijo jasno revizijsko sled ter vse druge informacije, potrebne za lažjo analizo Računskega sodišča;
Asks the Court of Auditors to provide reasons why its transaction sampling for the external aid chapter delivered a comparably low error rate (13 %), a big share of non-quantifiable errors at the level of the Union Delegations and no evidence of accuracy or occurrence errors in an area that is, by its nature, at high risk of misuse of funds; asks the Commission, and in particular the Union Delegations, to provide a clear audit trail and all other information necessary to facilitate the Court of Auditors’ analysis;
Izobraževanje in državljanstvo – 2 200 000 000 EUR
Education and Citizenship - EUR 2 200 000 000
opozarja, da se večina odhodkov s tega področja upravlja z neposrednim centraliziranim upravljanjem ali deljenim upravljanjem;
Recalls that the majority of expenditure in this area is managed by indirect centralised management or through shared management;
pozdravlja pozitivno vlogo Komisije, ki na tem področju vodi države članice, in jo spodbuja, naj še naprej širi zglede dobre prakse med nacionalnimi organi;
Welcomes the Commission's positive role in this area by providing guidance to the Member States and encourages the Commission to continue to spread good practice amongst national bodies;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča, da je stopnja napak pri vmesnih in končnih plačilih med 2 % in 5 % in da so bili nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi na tem političnem področju pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti vmesnih in končnih plačil, opravljenih v letu 2009, le delno učinkoviti;
Notes that the Court of Auditors found the error rate for closures to be between 2 % and 5 % and that the supervisory and control systems for this policy area were only partially effective in ensuring the regularity of closures made in 2009;
je zaskrbljen, da je 29 od 120 revidiranih vmesnih in končnih plačil (24 %) vsebovalo izmerljive napake;
Is worried that 29 of the 120 closures audited (24 %) contained quantifiable errors;
je zaskrbljen, ker nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi na ravni Komisije leta 2009 niso zaznali in odpravili precejšnjega števila napak pri vmesnih in končnih plačilih, opravljenih to leto;
Is worried that the supervisory and control systems at Commission level in 2009 left undetected and uncorrected a significant number of errors in the closures made that year;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej krepi preverjanje vmesnih in končnih plačil, s čimer bo zagotovila, da se bodo napake odkrile, in preprečila, da bi se že odkrite napake ponovile;
Invites the Commission to continue to reinforce the checks on closures to ensure that errors are detected and corrected and prevent the reoccurrence of previously identified errors;
Ekonomske in finančne zadeve – 700 000 000 EUR
Economic and Financial Affairs - EUR 700 000 000
opozarja, da so glavni programi v tej skupini politik del 6. in 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (222 000 000 EUR), vezano financiranje agencij Unije (116 000 000 EUR), Jamstveni sklad za zunanje ukrepe (92 000 000 EUR) ter okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost, ki je nasledil večletni program za podjetja in podjetništvo (175 000 000 EUR);
Recalls that the main programmes in this policy group are parts of the Sixth and Seventh Framework Programmes (FP) for research and technological development (EUR 222 000 000), the linked funding of Union agencies (EUR 116 000 000), the Guarantee Fund for external actions (EUR 92 000 000) and the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) which followed the Multiannual Programme for Enterprise and Entrepreneurship (MAP) (EUR 175 000 000);
prav tako opozarja, da se večina ukrepov v okviru 6. in 7. okvirnega programa ter programa za konkurenčnost in inovativnost financira prek sporazuma o donaciji s Komisijo, donacije pa se izplačujejo takole: predujmu ob podpisu sporazuma o donaciji sledijo vmesna in končna plačila, s katerimi se na podlagi izkazov stroškov, ki jih predložijo upravičenci, povrnejo upravičeni stroški;
Recalls further that the majority of the actions under FP6, FP7 and CIP are funded through a grant agreement with the Commission, and that grants are paid out as follows: an advance when the grant agreement is signed, followed by interim and final payments which reimburse eligible expenditure on the basis of cost statements submitted by the beneficiaries;
opozarja, da je Parlament v resolucijah o razrešnicah za proračunski leti 2007 in 2008 pozval Komisijo, naj upravičencem omogoči uporabo povprečnih stroškov dela na stroškovno mesto in naj ne zahteva individualnih stroškov za osebe, ki so dejavno vključene v specifične raziskovalne projekte; s tem v zvezi pozdravlja Sklep Komisije C(2011)0174 z dne 24. januarja 2011 o treh ukrepih za poenostavljeno izvajanje Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter Sklepa Sveta št. 970/2006/Euratom;
Recalls that the Parliament resolutions on discharge for the financial years 2007 and 2008 both call on the Commission to allow beneficiaries to use average personnel costs per cost centre and to refrain from requesting individual costs of persons actively involved in a specific research project; welcomes, in this regard, the Commission decision C(2011)0174 of 24 January 2011 on the three measures simplifying the implementation of Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Decision No 970/2006/Euratom;
ugotavlja, da pravilnost najbolj ogrožajo previsoke navedbe upravičenih stroškov v izkazu stroškov ter da nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi Komisije tega ne odkrijejo, Računsko sodišče pa kot ’visoko’ ocenjuje tveganje za pravilnost plačil, opravljenih na podlagi izkazov stroškov;
Notes that the main risk to regularity is that eligible costs in the cost statements are overstated and that this is not detected by the Commission's supervisory and control systems and that the Court of Auditors assesses as ’high’ the risk to regularity of payments made on the basis of cost statements;
je seznanjen z nazornimi primeri, ki jih je podalo Računsko sodišče v zvezi z naslednjim:
Notes the illustrative examples mentioned by the Court of Auditors as regards:
šestim okvirnim programom, kjer ni resnih pomanjkljivosti v izkazih stroškov odkrilo ne podjetje, ki je izdalo revizijsko potrdilo, ne drugo podjetje, ki je v imenu Komisije opravilo dva naknadna nadzora,
the Sixth Framework Programme where serious deficiencies in the cost statements were neither detected by the firm which provided the audit certificate nor during the two ex-post controls carried out by another external audit firm on behalf of the Commission,
sedmim okvirnim programom, kjer je eden od upravičencev pri obračunavanju stroškov osebja uporabil metodologijo, ki ni v skladu ne s pravili šestega okvirnega programa ne s pravili sedmega okvirnega programa, zato so pri revidiranem projektu izkazani stroški za več kot 17 % presegali dejanske stroške, enaka metodologija pa je bila uporabljena še pri 13 drugih projektih,
the Seventh Framework Programme where a beneficiary applied a methodology for the calculation of personnel costs which did not comply with either the FP6 or the FP7 rules, and, accordingly, for one project audited, the costs declared were overcharged by more than 17 % and that the same methodology was applied to another 13 projects,
Evropsko vesoljsko agencijo (skupno upravljanje), kjer je Računsko sodišče odkrilo, da so bili vključeni stroški, ki jih ne bi smela financirati Skupnost, ter stroški, ki niso bili v zadostni meri podkrepljeni z dokazi, in sicer v višini skoraj 10 % revidiranega vzorca, ugotovilo pa je tudi resne pomanjkljivosti pri pravilih in postopkih oddaje javnih naročil;
the European Space Agency (ESA) - Joint management - where the Court of Auditors noted the inclusion of costs which should not be funded by the Community, or costs which were insufficiently supported for an amount of close to 10 % of the audited sample, as well as serious weaknesses in the procurement rules and procedures;
z veliko zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče še naprej odkriva napake pri plačilih, za katera je odgovorni odredbodajalec podal mnenje brez pridržka, ter da je po mnenju Računskega sodišča revizijsko potrjevanje le delno učinkovito pri odkrivanju napak v izkazanih stroških;
Notes with concern and is worried that the Court of Auditors continues to detect errors in payments for which an unqualified opinion has been issued by the approved auditor and that the Court of Auditors considers audit certification as only partially effective in identifying errors in the declared costs;