natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je trdno prepričan, da združevanje in skupno izkoriščanje zmogljivosti ni le možno, ampak nujno; podpira države članice v prizadevanjih, da bi opredelile projekte, ki največ obetajo, kot del procesa, ki se je začel na ministrskem srečanju septembra 2010 v Gentu in v skladu z nemško-švedsko pobudo iz novembra 2010, ter priznava, da združevanje in skupno izkoriščanje ne moreta nadomestiti dejanskega razvoja zmogljivosti, ampak ga bosta okrepila in izboljšala; je seznanjen s prvo skupino projektov Evropske obrambne agencije, ki jih je Svet odobril 1. decembra 2011, in poziva države članice in Evropsko obrambno agencijo, naj najpozneje do pomladi 2012 predstavijo podrobnosti o napredku na poti do konkretnih rezultatov ter opredelijo dodatne priložnosti; poziva države članice, zlasti weimarski trikotnik, pa tudi formacijo Weimar plus, naj z delovanjem kot politična gonilna sila združevanje in skupno izkoriščanje obrneta v uspeh;
Is firmly convinced that pooling and sharing of capabilities is not an option any more, but a necessity; supports the Member States in their efforts to identify the most promising projects, as part of the process initiated at the September 2010 ministerial meeting in Ghent and in line with the November 2010 German-Swedish initiative, while recognising that pooling and sharing cannot replace the actual development of capabilities, but will enhance and improve it; takes note of the first set of projects facilitated by the EDA and endorsed by the Council on 1 December 2011, and calls on the Member States and the EDA to present details of the progress made towards concrete results and to define further opportunities by spring 2012 at the latest; urges the Member States, in particular the Weimar Triangle, but also the Weimar Plus formation, to make pooling and sharing a success by acting as a political driving force;
poudarja, da imajo lahko države članice zlasti na področjih, kot so strateški in taktični prevoz, logistična podpora, vzdrževanje, vesoljske zmogljivosti, kibernetska obramba, zdravniška oskrba, izobraževanje in usposabljanje ter pri nekaterih nišnih zmogljivostih, veliko korist od združevanja ali skupnega izkoriščanja nekaterih funkcij in sredstev, ne da bi pri tem postale zelo odvisne in omejene pri suverenem sprejemanju odločitev; močno podpira pobude, namenjene odpravi vrzeli v zmogljivostih na področjih, kot so transportni helikopterji, dotakanje goriva v zraku, pomorsko opazovanje, brezpilotna vozila, zaščita pred kemično, biološko, radiološko in jedrsko nevarnostjo, boj proti improviziranim eksplozivnim napravam, satelitska komunikacija, sistemi poveljevanja in kontrole, obveščevalne dejavnosti, nadzor in izvidništvo, senzorji in platforme, vključno z nadomestnimi rešitvami za satelitske sisteme, kot so brezpilotna letala z dolgim časom zadrževanja v zraku (HALE) in zelene tehnologije, ki so potrebne za doseganje velike operativne neodvisnosti in stroškovne učinkovitosti;
Stresses that, in particular in areas such as strategic and tactical transportation, logistical support, maintenance, space capabilities, cyber defence, medical support, education and training, as well as certain niche capabilities, Member States can greatly profit from pooling or sharing of some functions and assets without creating significant dependencies that would limit their sovereign decision-making; strongly encourages initiatives addressing capability gaps in areas such as transport helicopters, air-to-air refuelling, maritime surveillance, unmanned vehicles, protection against chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear risks, countering improvised explosive devices (IEDs), satellite communication, command and control systems, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) sensors and platforms, including alternatives to satellite systems, such as High Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) UAVs, as well as the necessary green technologies required to achieve high operational autonomy and cost effectiveness;
poudarja, da mora biti združevanje virov usklajeno z okrepljeno specializacijo, pri čemer morajo biti države članice, ki se odpovedujejo nekaterim zmogljivostim, prepričane, da jih bodo zagotovili drugi, in priznava, da bo za to potrebna trdna politična zavezanost nacionalnih vlad;
Stresses that pooling resources must go hand in hand with enhanced specialisation where Member States giving up certain capabilities can be confident that others will provide them and recognises that this will require serious political commitment by national governments;
poziva države članice, naj ustvarjalno izkoristijo različne obstoječe modele združevanja in skupnega izkoriščanja, kot so (1) združevanje s skupnim lastništvom, (2) združevanje sredstev v nacionalni lasti, (3) združevanje nabave ali (4) skupno izkoriščanje vlog in nalog, ali po potrebi kombinacije teh modelov, in poziva k hitremu napredku zlasti na zgoraj omenjenih področjih;
Invites the Member States to make creative use of the different pooling and sharing models that can be identified, such as (1) pooling through joint ownership, (2) pooling of nationally owned assets, (3) pooling of procurement, or (4) role- and task-sharing, and of combinations thereof as appropriate, and calls for quick progress especially in the areas mentioned above;
prvič, glede skupnega lastništva poziva države članice, naj preučijo možnosti skupne nabave nekatere opreme z namenskim združevanjem sodelujočih držav ali celo preko EU, pri čemer naj se zgledujejo po pobudah, kot so zmogljivosti strateškega zračnega prevoza, ki poteka v Natu, Natov program AWACS ali program EU Galileo, ali raziščejo možnosti, da bi EU financirala ali sofinancirala opremo, ki jo nabavi namensko združenje držav članic; poudarja možnost skupnega lastništva za najdražjo opremo, kot so vesoljske zmogljivosti, brezpilotna letala ali strateška transportna letala;
First, on ‘joint ownership’, calls on the Member States to explore the possibilities for certain equipment to be jointly acquired by consortia of participating countries or by the EU itself, taking inspiration from initiatives such as the Strategic Airlift Capability implemented under NATO, the NATO AWACS programme or the EU's Galileo, or to search for possibilities of EU funding or co-funding of equipment acquired by consortia of Member States; stresses the potential of joint ownership for the most expensive equipment, such as for space capabilities, UAVs or strategic transport aircraft;
drugič, glede združevanja sredstev v nacionalni lasti meni, da je pobuda štirih držav članic za evropsko poveljstvo za zračni prevoz posebej koristen primer, kjer se obstoječe zmogljivosti uporabljajo na najboljši možni način s prenosom nekaterih pristojnosti na skupno strukturo, obenem pa se v celoti ohranja nacionalno lastništvo sredstev; meni, da je ta model združenih, vendar razdružljivih zmogljivosti, primeren tudi za druge oblike operativne podpore, kot so transportni helikopterji, letala za pomorske patrulje in vojaška pomorska transportna sredstva; verjame, da mora biti prenos pristojnosti na združeno strukturo prilagodljiv in da ne sme vseh sodelujočih prisiliti v prenos istega niza pristojnosti, s čimer bi se izognili nevarnosti sprejemanja najnižjega skupnega imenovalca; kljub temu meni, da je primerno, da države članice prispevajo nacionalne zmogljivosti za ves spekter nalog evropskega poveljstva za zračni prevoz;
Second, on the ‘pooling of assets owned nationally’, views the European Air Transport Command (EATC) initiative of four Member States as a particularly useful example, where the use of existing capabilities is optimised by the transfer of some competencies to a common structure, while maintaining fully national ownership of assets; considers this model of pooled, but separable, capabilities to be well adapted also to other areas of operational support, such as transport helicopters, maritime patrol aircraft and military sealift assets; believes that any delegation of competences to an integrated structure needs to be flexible and should not require all participants to delegate the same set of competences, to avoid the risk of settling for the lowest common denominator; considers it desirable, however, that Member States provide national capabilities in the full range of the tasks of EATC;
tretjič, glede združevanja nabave, kot na primer pri programu A400M, opozarja na morebitne koristi skupnega nabavljanja zaradi ekonomije obsega, s čimer bi postavili trdne temelje obrambne industrije, vzpostavili interoperabilnost, na podlagi tega pa možnosti združevanja in skupnega izkoriščanja podpore med delovanjem, vzdrževanja in usposabljanja; obžaluje, da se te prednosti velikokrat ne izkoristijo zaradi različnih zahtev in sporazumov o delitvi dela, kot na primer pri programu Eurofighter; za popoln izkoristek možnosti varčevanja poudarja pomen ohranitve skupne konfiguracije skupno nabavljene opreme skozi ves življenjski cikel, kar bi olajšalo skupno podporo med delovanjem; države članice poziva, naj premislijo tudi o združevanju storitev, oddanih zunanjim izvajalcem;
Third, with respect to the ‘pooling of procurement’, such as in the A400M programme, highlights the potential benefits of joint procurement in terms of economies of scale, building a viable industrial base, interoperability, and subsequent possibilities of pooling and sharing in in-service support, maintenance and training; deplores the fact that these benefits are often lost due to differences in requirements and work-share agreements as in the case of the Eurofighter programme; in order to realise fully the potential savings, stresses the importance of maintaining a common configuration of jointly procured equipment through its entire life cycle in order to facilitate joint in-service support; invites the Member States also to consider the pooling of outsourced services;
četrtič, glede skupnega izkoriščanja vlog in nalog meni, da so pozitivni vzgledi za to pobude, kot so francosko-belgijsko sodelovanje pri usposabljanju pilotov lovcev, sporazum med Združenim kraljestvom in Francijo o skupni uporabi letalonosilk, francosko-nemška pobuda za usposabljanje pilotov helikopterjev, ali belgijsko-nizozemsko sodelovanje med mornaricama, pri katerih si partnerji delijo številne elemente nacionalne podpore; zlasti opozarja na možnosti pri izobraževanju, usposabljanju in vajah, in pri tem predvsem na skupno uporabo vojaških akademij, zmogljivosti za testiranje in ocenjevanje in za usposabljanje pilotov; kar zadeva nekatere nišne zmogljivosti, meni, da je skupno izkoriščanje vlog in nalog edini možni način za večino držav članic, da si zagotovijo dostop do nekaterih redkih zmogljivosti, kot so enote za kemično, biološko, radiološko in jedrsko orožje ali letala za zdravniško oskrbo;
Fourth, concerning ‘role and task sharing’, considers that positive examples exist in initiatives such as the French-Belgian cooperation in fighter pilot training, the UK-French agreement on the sharing of aircraft carriers, the French-German initiative on helicopter pilot training, or the Belgian-Dutch navy cooperation, where a number of national support structures are shared with the partner; highlights especially the opportunities in the area of education, training and exercises, and especially in sharing military academies, test and evaluation facilities and facilities for pilot training; in the case of some niche capabilities, considers role- and task-sharing the only viable way for most Member States to ensure access to some rare capabilities such as CBRN units or hospital aircraft;
ponovno spominja na pomembno vlogo Evropske obrambne agencije, ki jo določa Pogodba, glede dajanja predlogov za večstranske projekte, usklajevanja programov držav članic in upravljanja programov raziskovalnega in tehnološkega sodelovanja; posebej poudarja projekte agencije, ki že potekajo, kot je program usposabljanja pilotov helikopterjev in terenski forenzični laboratorij za boj proti improviziranim eksplozivnim napravam, ki se uporablja v Afganistanu, ter poziva k večjemu napredku pri preostalih pobudah, kot je evropska flota za zračni transport (EATF); poziva države članice, naj izkoristijo potencial agencije glede administrativne in pravne podpore, in naj ji zaupajo vodenje svojih pobud za sodelovanje, ter poudarja, da je treba agenciji zagotoviti sredstva, da bo kos večji odgovornosti;
Recalls the important role of the EDA, as defined by the Treaty, in proposing multilateral projects, coordinating Member States' programmes and managing R&T cooperation programmes; highlights the EDA-run projects that are already operational, such as the Helicopter Training Programme and the deployable forensic laboratory to counter IEDs and its application in Afghanistan, and calls for more progress on other initiatives such as the European Air Transport Fleet (EATF); urges the Member States to use the potential the Agency offers in terms of administrative and legal support and to entrust it with the management of their cooperation initiatives and underlines the need for the EDA to be given the means to deal with an increase of its responsibilities;
priznava, da so dvostranske in regionalne pobude, kot sta obrambni sporazum med Združenim kraljestvom in Francijo iz leta 2010, nordijsko obrambno sodelovanje in baltsko obrambno sodelovanje, pomembni koraki za smotrno porabo sredstev in zapolnitev kratkoročnih vrzeli v zmogljivostih; je seznanjen s predlogi za podobno sodelovanje v drugih regijah, kot je na primer projekt držav višegrajske skupine; kljub temu meni, da še vedno obstajajo velike strukturne vrzeli, ki jih je treba usklajeno obravnavati na ravni EU, in da je na neki točki te dvostranske in regijske dogovore treba povezati v širšo evropsko perspektivo in pri tem poskrbeti za to, da prispevajo k razvoju skupne varnostne in obrambne politike ter nikakor ne delujejo v nasprotju z njo; v zvezi s tem meni, da je Evropski obrambni agenciji treba omogočiti vlogo zagotavljanja splošne skladnosti prizadevanj in spodbuja nadaljnji premislek o tem, kako bi lahko določbe Pogodbe o stalnem strukturnem sodelovanju lahko uporabili tudi kot splošni usklajevalni okvir;
Recognises bilateral and regional initiatives such as the 2010 UK-French defence agreements, the Nordic Defence Cooperation and the Baltic Defence Cooperation as important steps for rationalising the use of resources and fill short-term capability gaps; notes the proposals for similar cooperations in other regions, such as among the Visegrád Group countries; takes the view, however, that significant structural gaps remain which need to be addressed in a coordinated fashion at EU level and that, therefore, at a certain point these bilateral or regional arrangements need to be integrated into the wider European perspective, making sure that they contribute to the development of CSDP and do not, in any way, run counter it; in this context, believes that the EDA should be given a role in ensuring overall coherence of efforts and encourages further reflection on how the Treaty provisions on the Permanent Structured Cooperation could be used to provide an overall coordination framework;
meni, da civilno-vojaško operativno poveljstvo EU, za katerega se je že večkrat zavzel, ne bi le bistveno povečalo zmogljivosti EU za podporo mednarodnega miru in varnosti, ampak da bi na ta način dolgoročno na osnovi združevanja in skupnega izkoriščanja lahko prihranili sredstva iz nacionalnih proračunov; poudarja, da so potrebne politične smernice podpredsednice/visoke predstavnice in slednjo poziva, naj nadaljuje delo na podlagi weimarske pobude, ter naj čim prej preuči pravne možnosti za oblikovanje samostojne zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij, sestavljene iz dveh linij poveljevanja – civilne in vojaške – v skladu z modelom, predloženim Svetu julija 2011;
Considers that a civil-military EU Operational Headquarters, for which it has repeatedly called, would not only substantially enhance the EU's capacity to support international peace and security, but would in the long run also generate savings for the national budgets in the logic of pooling and sharing; stresses that political guidance by the Vice-President / High Representative is needed and calls on the Vice-President / High Representative to continue work based on the ‘Weimar initiative’ and to investigate legal options for the establishment of an autonomous operational planning and conduct capability comprising two separate (civilian and military) chains of command, in line with the model presented to the Council in July 2011, as soon as possible;
pozdravlja Natovo pobudo pametne obrambe „Smart Defence“ in potrjuje pomen stalnega usklajevanja in odprave nasprotij med EU in Natom na vseh ravneh, da ne bi prihajalo do nepotrebnega podvajanja; poudarja, da je okrepitev praktičnega sodelovanja EU-NATO, zlasti v zvezi z odzivi na izzive finančne krize, nujna; poziva zlasti Evropsko obrambno agencijo in Zavezniško poveljstvo za preoblikovanje, naj tesno sodelujeta, tako da se bodo projekti združevanja in skupnega izkoriščanja obeh organizacij dopolnjevali in se bodo vedno izvajali v okviru, ki bo prinesel največjo dodano vrednost;
Welcomes the ‘Smart Defence’ initiative within NATO and reaffirms the importance of continuous coordination and deconfliction between the EU and NATO at all levels to avoid unnecessary duplication; stresses that an intensification of EU-NATO practical cooperation, in particular concerning the responses to the challenges of the financial crisis, is a must; calls in particular on the EDA and the Allied Command Transformation to cooperate closely to make sure that pooling and sharing projects of both organisations are complementary and are always implemented in the framework with the most added value;
opaža možnosti za združevanje sredstev za kibernetsko varnost glede na povezovanje evropskih kibernetskih sistemov ter ugotavlja, da je treba obravnavati potrebo po okrepljeni uskladitvi EU na tem področju;
Notes the potential for pooling of cyber defence assets, given the integration of European cyber systems, and the need to address the need for more EU coordination in this area;
Podpora obrambnih raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja
Supporting defence research and technological development
opozarja na pomen raziskav in inovacij v varnostnem in obrambnem sektorju kot osnove za konkurenčnost in trdnost evropske obrambne industrije, in njen pomen za izpolnitev ciljev trajnostne rasti skladno z dokumentom Evropa 2020; poudarja, da bodo sedanja prizadevanja na področju raziskav in tehnologije odločilnega pomena za obvladovanje prihodnjega tehnološkega napredka; obžaluje, da je raziskavam in tehnologiji namenjen le 1 % celotnih obrambnih izdatkov držav EU, pri čemer je več kot 50 % še vedno namenjenih osebju, in zlasti, da je ta delež v večini držav članic krepko pod 1 %; poziva države članice, naj raziskave in tehnologijo nujno izključijo iz krčenja porabe;
Recalls the importance of research and innovation in the security and defence sector as the basis for the competitiveness and resilience of the European defence industry, and its importance for the achievement of the Europe 2020 goals of sustainable growth; points out that current research and technology (R&T) efforts will be determining in mastering future technological advances; deplores the fact that only about 1 % of EU countries' overall defence spending goes to R&T, while more than 50 % continues to be spent on personnel, and in particular that for most Member States this is well below 1 %; urges the Member States to exclude R&T from their spending cuts as a matter of priority;
obžaluje, da se velik del potenciala ekonomije obsega v povezavi s projekti sodelovanja ne porabi, pri čemer se približno 85 % izdatkov za raziskave in tehnologijo še vedno potroši na nacionalni ravni, velika večina preostalih izdatkov pa se porabi na dvostranski in ne na večnacionalni ravni, zaradi česar se med državami članicami pojavlja drobitev; ugotavlja, da so se evropski ministri za obrambo novembra 2007 dogovorili o skupnih primerjalnih merilih, da bi porabo za raziskave in tehnologije na področju obrambe povečali na 2 % skupnih izdatkov za obrambo, porabo za raziskave in tehnologije na področju obrambe, ki potekajo preko evropskega sodelovanja, pa na 20 %;
Regrets the fact that the potential of economies of scale from collaborative projects remains largely unused, with about 85 % of R&T expenditure still spent nationally and the large majority of the rest spent at bilateral and not multinational level, having as consequence the fragmentation among Member States; recalls that European Ministers of Defence agreed in November 2007 collective benchmarks to increase defence R&T spending to 2 % of all defence expenditure and to bring European collaborative defence R&T spending to a level of 20 %;
opozarja na ključno vlogo Evropske obrambne agencije pri usklajevanju in načrtovanju skupnih obrambnih raziskovalnih dejavnosti; poudarja koristi sodelovanja na področju raziskav za boljšo interoperabilnost in posledično večjo homogenost med opremo in zmogljivostmi nacionalnih oboroženih sil, saj so raziskave prvi korak vseh programov opremljanja;
Highlights the fundamental role of the EDA in coordinating and planning joint defence research activities; stresses the benefits of research cooperation in terms of improved interoperability, and eventually greater homogeneity among the equipment and capabilities of the national armed forces, since research is the first phase of any equipment programme;
opozarja na vedno številčnejšo tehnologijo z dvojno uporabo in posledično na pomen vedno večjega dopolnjevanja in medsebojnih učinkov med evropskimi obrambnimi in civilnimi varnostnimi raziskovalnimi programi; spodbuja Evropsko obrambno agencijo in Komisijo, naj se usklajujeta v okviru evropskega okvira za sodelovanje, da bi čimbolj povečali medsebojne učinke med „varnostno“ temo okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj, zlasti na področjih, kot so zaščita pred kemično, biološko, radiološko in jedrsko nevarnostjo, boj proti improviziranim eksplozivnim napravam, brezpilotni zračni sistemi, pomorsko opazovanje, upravljanje in obdelava podatkov ter kibernetska obramba;
Recalls the ever growing number of technologies with dual-use applications, and therefore the importance of increasing complementarities and synergies between European defence and civilian security research programmes; encourages the EDA and the Commission to pursue their coordination within the European Framework Cooperation, in order to maximise synergies with the ‘Security’ theme of the Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, in particular in areas such as CBRN protection, counter improvised explosive devices, unmanned aerial systems, maritime surveillance, information management and processing, and cyber defence;
posebej poudarja, da morajo biti varnostne raziskave v naslednjem programu Horizon 2020 samostojen element; meni, da je treba obseg varnostne teme povečati, tako da bo odražal potrebo po prenosu inovacij in tehnologije med civilno in obrambno industrijo, vendar trdi, da mora tema obdržati prvenstveno civilno usmerjenost ob upoštevanju vseh zadevnih z obrambo povezanih potreb v programih in projektih;
Stresses in particular that security research needs to be maintained as an independent component in the next Horizon 2020 Programme; takes the view that the scope of the ‘Security’ theme should be expanded to reflect the necessity for innovation and technology transfer between the civil and the defence industry, but maintains that, while taking due account of any relevant defence-related requirements in the programmes and projects, the theme should keep its civilian focus;