natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da mora prerazporeditev sredstev za okrepljeno financiranje evropske sosedske politike temeljiti na jasnih prednostnih nalogah in zato ne sme ogroziti instrumenta za stabilnost, ki je edino orodje Unije za odziv na krize in izgradnjo miru, kot je predlagala Komisija; poudarja, da sedanja kriza javnega dolga ne sme ogroziti financiranja evropske sosedske politike;
Underlines that the reallocation of appropriations needed for the increased funding for the ENP should be based on clear priorities and should therefore not be to the detriment of the Union's only crisis response and peace-building tool, the Instrument for Stability, as proposed by the Commission; emphasises that the funding of the ENP should not be affected by the current sovereign debt crisis;
obžaluje, da se velik del finančnih sredstev v okviru evropske sosedske politike porabi za svetovanje namesto za projekte in programe, in v zvezi s tem poziva, naj se poraba finančnih sredstev v okviru novega instrumenta hitro ponovno uravnoteži;
Regrets that a high percentage of the ENP funds available are spent on consultancy instead of going to projects and programmes and calls, in this respect, for a quick rebalance in their use under the new instrument;
poudarja, da je treba v primerih, ko je Unija uporabila humanitarno pomoč, poskrbeti za ustrezen prehod med sanacijo, obnovo in razvojem, da se odpravijo uničujoče posledice revolucij;
Highlights the importance, in cases where the EU has mobilised humanitarian aid, of ensuring a suitable transition between rehabilitation, reconstruction and development in order to remedy some of the destructive consequences of the revolutions;
meni, da bi mehanizem za spodbujanje razvoja civilne družbe (CSF) lahko postal sestavni del evropskega sosedskega instrumenta; predlaga, da bi preučili, kako preusmeriti upravljanje finančnih sredstev evropskega sosedskega instrumenta na mehanizem CSF, če države zaradi prenizke uspešnosti ne zadostijo pogojem za financiranje;
Considers that the CSF could be envisaged as an integral part of ENI; suggests considering the idea of redirecting the management of the ENI funds to the CSF if states fail to meet the conditions for financing due to unsatisfactory performance;
opozarja na osrednjo vlogo evropskega sosedskega instrumenta pri podpori makroregijskih strategij EU, kot sta strategija EU za regijo Baltskega morja in strategija EU za podonavsko regijo, saj zagotavlja sredstva za zunanje razsežnosti teh strategij, predvsem dejavnosti, ki zadevajo sosednje države;
Emphasises the critical role of the ENI in supporting EU macro-regional strategies, such as the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region and the EU Strategy for the Danube Region, by providing funding for the external dimension of these strategies, most importantly activities which involve neighbouring countries;
poudarja, da bi porazdelitev sredstev morala temeljiti na omejenem številu jasno določenih prednostnih nalog in merljivih ciljev po dogovoru z državami partnericami in ob upoštevanju njihovih potreb ter na osnovi jasnega pogojevanja in doseženega napredka; poudarja, da bi morali proračunsko podporo uporabiti samo, če je zagotovljeno dobro proračunsko upravljanje, in hkrati poudarja, da bi se za boljše upoštevanje prednostnih nalog moral uporabiti cel spekter razpoložljivih orodij; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je treba izboljšati zakonodajo na področju javnih naročil in upravljanja javnih financ v državah evropske sosedske politike;
Emphasises that the allocation of resources should be based on a limited number of clearly defined priorities and measurable objectives, in agreement with partner countries, taking into account their needs and based on clear conditionality and on the progress already achieved; underlines that budget support should be used only where there are guarantees for sound budgetary management and that the full range of available tools should be used to better reflect the priorities; outlines, in this context, the need for enhanced public procurement legislation and public finances management of the ENP countries;
poudarja, da je potreben skladen pristop pri pomoči sosednjim državam, ki ga posamezne države članice EU in EU zagotavljajo v okviru evropske sosedske politike; podpira vse mehanizme, ki bodo pomagali usklajevati in racionalizirati ukrepe evropskih donatorjev v državah evropske sosedske politike, če s tem ne bodo dodane nepotrebne birokratske ovire;
Underlines the need for a consistent approach in the assistance provided to neighbouring countries by each individual EU Member State and the EU within the ENP framework; favours every mechanism that would help to coordinate and streamline the action of the different EU donors in the ENP countries, without adding unnecessary bureaucratic layers;
poudarja, da čeprav lahko pomoč deluje kot vzvod za države evropske sosedske politike, ni zadostno jamstvo za trajnostni in trajni napredek; zato poziva države evropske sosedske politike, naj povečajo in uporabijo svoje domače vire, vzpostavijo pregledne sisteme obdavčenja, v program evropske sosedske politike učinkovito vključijo zasebni sektor, lokalne oblasti in civilno družbo ter se bolj poistovetijo s projekti evropske sosedske politike;
Points out that although aid can act as a leverage for ENP countries, it is not enough to guarantee sustainable and lasting development; therefore calls on ENP countries to strengthen and mobilise their domestic resources, set up transparent taxation systems, involve the private sector, local governments and civil society effectively in the ENP agenda and aim for their greater ownership of ENP projects;
pozdravlja odločitev držav članic skupine G8, da povečajo posojilne instrumente za države južnega partnerstva, ki so začele proces prehoda v demokracijo; meni, da zaveze, sprejete v okviru „Partnerstva iz Deauvilla“ 27. maja 2011, spodbujajo uporabo finančnih sredstev v korist demokraciji in razvoju v državah partnericah Evropske unije;
Welcomes the decision of the G8 member countries to increase loan facilities for Southern partnership countries which have embarked on a democratic transition; considers that the commitments entered into in the ‘Deauville Partnership’ on 27 May 2011 are likely to encourage financial mobilisation in support of democracy and development in the EU's partner countries;
glede na arabsko pomlad, pa tudi na zaton demokracije v nekaterih državah vzhodnega partnerstva poziva k posebni samokritični oceni finančnih instrumentov, ki so se v preteklosti uporabljali v okviru evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva, kar zadeva njihovo delovanje na področju demokracije, človekovih pravic, upravljanja, boja proti korupciji, vzpostavljanja institucij in podpore civilni družbi; meni, da mora EU sprejeti novejši pristop za krepitev sodelovanja z namenom preprečevanja konfliktov;
Calls, in the light of the Arab Spring as well as the retreat from democracy in some of the Eastern partnership countries, for a specific self-critical evaluation of the financial instruments used in the past within the ENPI, with regard to their functioning in the fields of democracy, human rights, governance, fighting corruption, institution-building and support to civil society; believes that the EU must assume a newer approach enhancing cooperation for conflict prevention;
je trdno prepričan, da je treba pri tej reviziji preučiti tudi finančno pomoč palestinski upravi in Agenciji Združenih narodov za pomoč in zaposlovanje palestinskih beguncev na Bližnjem vzhodu (UNRWA) ter jo kot sestavni del sosedske politike vključiti v dolgoročno načrtovanje programov; meni, da argument, da je zaradi politične nestabilnosti v regiji in posebnosti mirovnega procesa mogoče le začasno načrtovanje in krepitev za vsak primer posebej, ni tehten;
Is of the firm conviction that financial assistance to the Palestinian Authority and UNRWA must also be examined in the context of this review and be subject to long-term programming, as an integral part of the Neighbourhood Policy; does not consider the argument valid that the political instability in the region and the specificities of the peace process only allow provisional programming and case-by-case reinforcement;
glede na trenutne nujne potrebe zlasti v južnem sosedstvu poziva k hitremu dogovoru med Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom o predlogu za okrepitev instrumenta sosedstva v obdobju 2012 do 2013; poleg tega poziva države članice, naj nemudoma izpolnijo dvostranske zaveze glede južnega Sredozemlja in vzhodnega partnerstva;
Calls, given the current pressing needs, especially in the Southern neighbourhood, for a swift agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the proposal for reinforcing the Neighbourhood Instrument over the period 2012 to 2013; calls furthermore on Member States to promptly fulfil their bilateral pledges to the Southern Mediterranean and Eastern Partnership;
vztraja, da mora Svet brez nadaljnjega odlašanja sprejeti zakonodajni predlog za spremembo člena 23 uredbe o evropskem instrumentu sosedstva in partnerstva, ki ga je Komisija predložila maja 2008, Parlament pa sprejel 8. julija 2008, ki bi omogočil ponovno naložbo sredstev, vrnjenih od preteklih dejavnosti; ponovno poudarja, da se ta ukrep že upošteva kot dejstvo in se odraža v predlogu za financiranje pregleda evropske sosedske politike v proračunu za leta 2011–2013; poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli, kako bi lahko še zagotovili, da bodo takoj na voljo dodatna sredstva tveganega kapitala EIB za južno in vzhodno razsežnost;
Insists that the Council should adopt without further delay the legislative proposal to amend Article 23 of the ENPI Regulation presented by the Commission in May 2008 and adopted by Parliament on 8 July 2008, which would make it possible to reinvest funds returned following past operations; recalls that this measure is already considered as a given and is reflected in the proposal for financing the review of the ENP in the 2011-2013 budget; calls on the Commission to consider alternative ways to ensure additional risk capital funds to be immediately made available through the EIB, for both the Southern and the Eastern dimensions;
pozdravlja opravljeno delo, ki sta ga izvedli Evropska investicijska banka, zlasti preko Sklada za evro-sredozemske naložbe in partnerstvo, in Evropska banka za obnovo in razvoj (EBOR), ter poudarja pomen večje sinergije in potrebo po njej z drugimi nacionalnimi in mednarodnimi finančnimi institucijami, ki tudi delujejo v teh državah; podpira spremembo statuta banke EBOR, tako da bodo tudi države partnerice južnega sosedstva upravičene do njene pomoči, ob zagotavljanju, da EIB in EBOR, katerih kapital je v obeh primerih v pretežni meri evropski, vzpostavita ploden odnos, ki ga zaznamuje sodelovanje in ne konkurenca;
Welcomes the work carried out by the European Investment Bank, in particular through the Facility for Euro-Mediterranean Investment and Partnership, and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and underlines the importance of and the need for more synergies with other national and international financial institutions also active in these countries; supports the modification of the EBRD's statutes in order for the Southern neighbourhood partners also to be eligible for its assistance and wishes to ensure that the EIB and the EBRD, whose capital is for the most part, in both cases, of European origin, are brought into a fruitful relationship based on cooperation, not driven by competition;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko/podpredsednici Komisije, Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, držav evropske sosedske politike in generalnemu sekretarju Unije za Sredozemlje.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission, the EEAS, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the ENP countries and the Secretary-General of the Union for the Mediterranean.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. decembra 2011 o politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu: glavni dosežki in izzivi za prihodnost ( 2010/2311(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 14 December 2011 on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges ( 2010/2311(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, členov 2, 3 in 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in ustreznih členov Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
having regard to having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to Articles 2, 3 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union, and to the relevant Articles of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije iz leta 2003 Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu – Evropska varnostna strategija, ki jo je 12. decembra 2003 v Bruslju odobril Evropski svet in ki je bila sestavljena v skladu s pristojnostmi visokega predstavnika EU Javierja Solane
having regard to the 2003 European Security Strategy A Secure Europe in a Better World - The European Security Strategy, Approved by the European Council held in Brussels on 12 December 2003 and drafted under the responsibilities of the EU High Representative Javier Solana
in poročila o njenem izvajanju iz leta 2008 Poročilo o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije – Zagotavljanje varnosti v spreminjajočem se svetu, S 407/08
and its implementation report of 2008 Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy - Providing Security in a Changing World, S 407/08
, kakor je spremenjen z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2008/919/PNZ UL L 330, 9.12.2008, str.
as amended by Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA OJ L 330, 9.12.2008, p.
, in člena 10 tega sklepa o pomoči žrtvam in njihovi zaščiti,
, and notably Article 10 thereof on the protection and assistance of victims,
ob upoštevanju strategije Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu iz leta 2005 Dokument Sveta 14469/4/05.
having regard to the 2005 EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy Council Document 14469/4/05.
ob upoštevanju strategije Evropske unije za boj proti radikalizaciji in novačenju za terorizem Dokument Sveta 14781/1/05.
having regard to the EU Strategy for Combating Radicalisation and Recruitment to Terrorism Council Document 14781/1/05.
Dokument Sveta 15175/08.
Council Document 15175/08.
ob upoštevanju stockholmskega programa – odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi državljanom in jih varuje UL C 115, 4.5.2010, str.
having regard to the Stockholm Programme - An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens OJ C 115, 4.5.2010, p.
, in sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z 20. aprila 2010 z naslovom „Zagotavljanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane Evrope: Akcijski načrt izvajanja stockholmskega programa“ ( KOM(2010)0171 ),
, and the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions of 20 April 2010 on Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe's citizens: Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme ( COM(2010)0171 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Europola o stanju in trendih na področju terorizma v EU za leto 2011 (TE-SAT 2011),
having regard to the Europol EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report for 2011 (TE-SAT 2011),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 20. julija 2010 o politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu: glavni dosežki in izzivi za prihodnost ( KOM(2010)0386 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 20 July 2010 on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges ( COM(2010)0386 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo osebnih podatkov z dne 24. novembra 2010 o sporočilu o politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu: glavni dosežki in izzivi za prihodnost UL C 56, 22.2.2011, str.
having regard to the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 24 November 2010 on the Communication on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges OJ C 56, 22.2.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora o sporočilu o politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu: glavni dosežki in izzivi za prihodnost SOC 388 – CESE 800/2011.
having regard to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges SOC 388 - CESE 800/2011.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu za naslovom „Izvajanje strategije notranje varnosti EU: pet korakov k varnejši Evropi“ ( KOM(2010)0673 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe ( COM(2010)0673 ),
ob upoštevanju Konvencije Sveta Evrope iz leta 1983 o odškodnini žrtvam nasilnih kaznivih dejanj (CETS št. 116), Konvencije Sveta Evrope iz leta 2005 o preprečevanju terorizma (CETS št. 196), smernic Sveta Evrope iz leta 2005 o zaščiti žrtev terorističnih dejanj, priporočila Sveta Evrope št. 8 iz leta 2006 o pomoči žrtvam kaznivih dejanj in predloga Komisije iz leta 2011 za direktivo o določitvi minimalnih standardov na področju pravic, podpore in zaščite žrtev kaznivih dejanj ( KOM(2011)0275 ),
having regard to the 1983 Council of Europe Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes (CETS No. 116), the 2005 Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No. 196), the 2005 Council of Europe Guidelines on the Protection of Victims of Terrorist Acts, the 2006 Council of Europe Recommendation (2006)8 on Assistance to Crime Victims, and the 2011 Commission proposal for a Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime ( COM(2011)0275 ),
ob upoštevanju vmesnega pregleda 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave in zelene knjige z naslovom „Spremeniti izzive v priložnosti: na poti k skupnemu, strateškemu okviru za financiranje raziskav in inovacij v EU“,
having regard to the mid-term review of the 7th Framework Programme for Research and to the Green Paper entitled ‘From challenges to opportunities: towards a common strategic framework for EU research and innovation funding’,
ob upoštevanju svojih številnih resolucij o boju proti terorizmu,
having regard to its various resolutions related to counter-terrorism,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2580/2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu UL L 344, 28.12.2001, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p.
in Skupnega stališča Sveta 2001/931/SZVP z dne 27. decembra 2001 o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu UL L 344, 28.12.2001, str.
, and to Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism OJ L 344, 28.12.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve in Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0286/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0286/2011 ),
ker je prvo desetletje 21. stoletja, ki je sledilo okrutnim napadom 11. septembra 2001, zaznamovala „vojna proti terorizmu“, zlasti kar zadeva pristop ZDA; čeprav se ti in drugi napadi podobnega obsega niso zgodili na evropskih tleh, so načrtovanje in priprave teh napadov potekali deloma v Evropi in smo jih vsi Evropejci občutili kot napad na naše vrednote in naš način življenja;
whereas after the atrocious attacks of 11 September 2001 the first decade of the 21st century has been marked by the ‘War on Terrorism’, especially with regard to the U.S. approach; whereas, although these attacks or other attacks of similar magnitude did not take place on European soil, the planning and preparation of the attacks took place partially in Europe, and many Europeans felt them to be an attack on their values and their way of life;
ker je Evropska unija v 21. stoletju vse pomembnejša tarča in žrtev terorizma in se sooča s stalno grožnjo;
whereas the European Union has been a greater target for, and victim of, terrorism in the 21st century and faces an ever present threat;
ker poročilo Europola o stanju in trendih na področju terorizma v EU za leto 2011 (TE-SAT 2011) kaže na dejstvo, da ostaja tveganje terorističnih napadov v EU veliko in da se krepi povezava med terorizmom in organiziranim kriminalom, ter na trend zmanjševanja terorističnih napadov, za katere sprejmejo odgovornost separatistične teroristične organizacije ali se jim pripisujejo, v primerjavi z letom 2006, čeprav je še vedno večina vseh terorističnih napadov v Evropi te vrste;
whereas the Europol 2011 EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT 2011) indicates that the threat of terrorist attacks in the EU remains serious, and that the links between terrorism and organised crime appear to be growing, and points to the fact that there is a decreasing trend of terrorist attacks claimed or attributed to separatist terrorist organisations as compared with 2006, although they still account for the majority of overall terrorist attacks in the EU;
ker stockholmski program opredeljuje dve grožnji notranji varnosti, mednarodni terorizem in organizirani kriminal, in ker sta v mnogih primerih ti dve grožnji prisotni na istih področjih, na primer v trgovini z orožjem in trgovini z mamili;
whereas the Stockholm Programme identifies two threats to internal security – international terrorism and organised crime – which, in many cases, operate in the same areas of activity, such as arms and drugs trafficking for example;
ker terorizem ni nov pojav; ker se v zadnjih desetletjih terorizem pojavlja v novih oblikah, kot je recimo kibernetski terorizem, teroristične mreže pa so postale bolj zapletene, kar zadeva njihovo strukturo, sredstva in financiranje, zaradi česa je tudi teroristična grožnja bolj zapletena; ker je boj proti terorizmu od vedno del področja pristojnosti držav članic in sodi med redne dejavnosti organov odkrivanja in pregona; ker so napadi 11. septembra ter v Madridu in Londonu prinesli korenite spremembe v dojemanju pojava terorizma ter v metodah in instrumentih za boj proti njemu; in ker je zaradi teh napadov terorizem postal pojav, ki vpliva na varnost vse Evropske unije, ne le nacionalne varnosti držav članic z zelo različnimi pravnimi okviri;
whereas terrorism is not a recent phenomenon; whereas in recent decades terrorism has taken new forms such as cyber–terrorism, and terrorist networks have become more complex in structure, means and financing, thus making the terrorist threat all the more complex; whereas counter-terrorism has always been part of the sphere of competence of the Member States and of regular law enforcement action; whereas the 9/11, Madrid and London attacks led to a fundamental change in perception of the terrorist phenomenon and in the methods and instruments used to fight terrorism; and whereas as a result of those attacks terrorism became a matter affecting the security of the whole European Union and not just the national security of the Member States, with a very different legal framework;
ker je EU v Okvirnem sklepu 2002/475/PNZ opredelila teroristična kazniva dejanja, čeprav ni nedvoumne mednarodne opredelitve terorizma;
whereas, in spite of the lack of unambiguous international definitions of terrorism, the EU has defined terrorist offences in Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA;
ker je bistveno mednarodno sodelovanje, če želimo terorizmu odvzeti finančne, logistične in operativne temelje;
whereas international cooperation is essential to deprive terrorism of its financial, logistical and operational bases;