natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker Lizbonska pogodba daje Uniji status pravne osebe, povečuje možnosti, da se EU pridruži različnim mednarodnim organizacijam, zagotavlja širši obseg pristojnosti pri zunanjem delovanju, ji predvsem z ustanovitvijo mesta podpredsednika Komisije/visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko ter Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje daje jasnejši in močnejši glas v svetu, spodbuja vse vrste vzajemno koristnega sodelovanja EU z ustreznimi mednarodnimi in regionalnimi organizacijami ter skupinami držav in omogoča, da se lahko Unija organizira tako, da lahko postane učinkovit svetovni akter,
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon, by introducing the Union's legal personality, enhances the EU's capacity to join various international organisations, entrusts it with a wider range of competences in its external action, provides, notably by the creation of the post of a Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) and the European External Action Service (EEAS), the Union with an opportunity for a clearer and stronger single voice in the world, as well as encouraging all types of mutually beneficial cooperation with relevant international and regional organisations and groups of states, and whereas it enables the Union to organise itself in such a way as to be able to become an effective global player,
ker so bile z Lizbonsko pogodbo vzpostavljene nove stalne strukture za zunanje zastopanje Evropske unije, tako da bodo lahko novi predstavniki EU prevzeli naloge, ki jih je prej opravljalo rotirajoče predsedstvo EU, in ker ustanovitev Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje zagotavlja priložnost za izvajanje učinkovite večstranske diplomacije,
whereas new permanent structures were created by the Treaty of Lisbon for the EU's external representation, providing for the new EU representatives to take over functions previously carried out by the rotating Presidency of the EU and whereas the creation of the EEAS provides an opportunity to exercise efficient multilateral diplomacy,
ker je zastopanje Evropske unije in njenih držav članic v večstranskih organizacijah, na neformalnih vrhunskih srečanjih in v mednarodnih režimih razdrobljeno, pogosto neučinkovito in še vedno zelo različno; ker se je zunanje zastopanje Unije razvijalo nepovezano, nedosledno in bolj ali manj priložnostno; ker bo zelo razdrobljeno zunanje zastopanje verjetno ogrozilo sporočilo in zavezanost Evropske unije učinkovitemu multilateralizmu in svetovnemu upravljanju in ker ji šibke pristojnosti in neučinkoviti mehanizmi za usklajevanje preprečujejo govoriti z enim glasom na mednarodnem prizorišču, s čimer omejujejo njeno odločnost in spodkopavajo njeno verodostojnost; ker bo čim boljše izkoriščanje celotnega potenciala Lizbonske pogodbe na mednarodnem prizorišču zahtevalo močno politično voljo in prožnost držav članic, ko gre za njihovo zastopanje, in ker status EU v mednarodnih organizacijah pogosto zaostaja za razvojem pristojnosti EU,
whereas the representation of the EU and its Member States in multilateral organisations, informal summits and international regimes is fragmented, often ineffective, and still varies considerably; whereas the Union's external representation has developed in a dispersed, inconsistent and rather ad hoc manner; whereas a highly fragmented external representation is likely to undermine the EU's message and commitment to effective multilateralism and global governance, and whereas weak EU competences and ineffective coordination mechanisms may prevent the EU from speaking with a single voice in the international arena, thereby limiting its decisiveness and undermining its credibility; whereas the maximisation of the Treaty's full potential in the international sphere will require strong political will and flexibility on the part of the Member States concerning their representation, and whereas the EU's status in international organisations often lags behind the development of the EU's competences,
ker je svetovna finančna kriza pospešila premik relativne gospodarske teže z razvitih gospodarstev na trge v vzponu in ker bo imela zaradi tega EU močan in učinkovit glas v svetu le, če bo posredovala enotno sporočilo,
whereas the global financial crisis has accelerated the shift of relative economic weight from advanced economies to emerging markets, and whereas against this background the EU will only have a strong and effective voice in the world if it delivers a single message,
ker so države članice EU za prednostno nalogo sprejele reformo in okrepitev Združenih narodov, da bi zagotovili pravičnejšo geografsko zastopanost, odražali današnje spreminjajoče se geopolitične stvarnosti v članstvu varnostnega sveta in bili sposobni izpolniti svoje dolžnosti ter učinkovito delovati pri iskanju rešitev za svetovne izzive in se odzivati na najpomembnejše grožnje; ker Evropska unija prispeva več kot tretjino rednega proračuna Združenih narodov, več kot dve petini za njihove mirovne operacije ter približno polovico vseh prispevkov za njihove sklade in programe in ker morajo biti njene finančne obveznosti v skladu z njeno politično težo,
whereas the EU Member States are prioritising the reform and strengthening of the UN in order to provide a more equitable geographical representation, to reflect today's shifting geopolitical realities in the membership of the Security Council, and to make it capable of fulfilling its responsibilities and acting effectively in providing solutions to global challenges and responding to key threats; whereas the EU provides more than one third of the UN regular budget, more than two fifths of UN peace operations, and about half of all contributions to UN funds and programmes, and whereas its financial commitment should therefore be consistent with its political weight,
ker so institucionalni mehanizmi, kot je vse tesnejše in učinkovitejše usklajevanje med državami članicami EU, lahko način uresničevanja cilja skupne zunanje zastopanosti EU in njenih držav članic in ker bi posvetovanja med nacionalnimi in Evropskim parlamentom na področju SZVP in SVOP lahko postala pobuda za to,
whereas institutional mechanisms such as ever closer and more effective coordination between the EU Member States can be seen as a way to the objective of joint external representation of the EU and its Member States, and whereas consultations between national parliaments and the European Parliament in the areas of CFSP/CSDP could become a catalyst in this process,
ker je z reformo glasov in kvot v Mednarodnem denarnem skladu in Svetovni banki iz leta 2010 prišlo do večjega števila glasov in zastopanosti trgov v vzponu in držav v razvoju v mednarodnih finančnih institucijah, kar so olajšali tudi prispevki Evropske unije; ker vloga, ki jo ima Unija ne glede na višino prispevka pri kapitalu teh institucij, ne ustreza povsem njenemu pomenu v svetovnem gospodarstvu in trgovini in ker sedanji ustroj zunanjega zastopanja prinaša visoke stroške za izmenjavo in usklajevanje,
whereas the 2010 voice and quota reform in the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank resulted in an increase in the voice and representation of emerging markets and developing countries in the IFIs, which was facilitated by European contributions, whereas the role played by the EU – notwithstanding the size of its contribution to the capital of those institutions – does not entirely correspond to its weight in the world economy and in world trade, and whereas the current set-up of external representation carries high transaction and coordination costs,
ker bi moral skupni cilj Evropske unije in zveze NATO za ’strateško partnerstvo’ omogočiti učinkovito sinergijo in večjo optimizacijo sredstev obeh organizacij ter zagotoviti učinkovito sodelovanje; ker bi morala Evropska unija in zveza NATO zagotavljati učinkovito krizno upravljanje, da bi našli najboljši odgovor na krizo, z resnično usklajenim delovanjem in največjim izkoriščanjem znanja in sredstev obeh organizacij v skladu z zaključki vrhunskega srečanja NATA v Washingtonu leta 1999, Evropskega sveta v Nici leta 2002, skupne izjave EU-NATO z dne 16. decembra 2002 in ob upoštevanju izida lizbonskega vrhunskega srečanja z novembra 2010,
whereas the EU and NATO's common objective of achieving a ’strategic partnership’ should allow for effective synergies and greater maximisation of the assets of both organisations and ensure effective cooperation; whereas the EU and NATO should ensure efficient crisis management in order to identify the best possible response to a crisis, acting in a truly coordinated manner and making the most of the expertise and resources of both organisations, in line with the conclusions of the 1999 NATO Washington Summit, the 2002 Nice European Council, the EU-NATO Joint Declaration of 16 December 2002, and taking into consideration the outcome of the NATO Lisbon Summit of November 2010,
ker bi morala mednarodna diplomacija vrhunskih srečanj povečati svoj potencial in spodbuditi širše večstransko sodelovanje z namenom gradnje svetovne varnosti s pomočjo uresničevanja razvojnih ciljev tisočletja in povečanja človekove varnosti,
whereas international summit diplomacy should strengthen its potential to stimulate broader multilateral cooperation, with a view to building global security through the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals and the enhancement of human security,
ker bodo imele korenite demografske spremembe, ki potekajo znotraj in zunaj EU, posledice za multilateralizem, saj se bo z novo stvarnostjo izvajalo pritisk za poziv za prilagoditev članstva, sedežev in glasovalnih pravic v večstranskih organizacijah; ker bi morala Evropska unija v okviru uravnoteženja zastopanosti, ki bo nedvomno bistveno vplivalo na države EU, od gospodarstev v vzponu ustrezno in z uporabo svojih diplomatskih instrumentov zahtevati zavezo za tvorno in pregledno vedenje v razvijajočem se večstranskem sistemu, in sicer na področjih trajnostnega razvoja, izkoreninjenja revščine, boja proti terorizmu in mednarodnemu organiziranemu kriminalu ter podnebnih sprememb; ker bo sodelovanje Unije v nastajajočih strukturah za svetovno upravljanje ter pri pogajanjih o novih pravilih in načelih zahtevalo kompromise s tistimi državami in novimi akterji, ki si prizadevajo, da bi bil njihov glas slišan na mednarodnem prizorišču,
whereas the ongoing dramatic demographic changes, both in and outside the EU, will have consequences for multilateralism, as new realities are creating pressure to call for the adjustment of membership, seats and voting rights in multilateral organisations; whereas, accordingly, the EU, in the context of rebalancing its representation, which will inevitably have a substantial effect on EU countries, should request – by making full use of its diplomatic instruments – a commitment from the emerging economies to constructive and transparent behaviour in the evolving multilateral system, namely in the areas of sustainable development, the eradication of poverty, the fight against terrorism and international organised crime and climate change; whereas the EU's participation in emerging structures for global governance and the negotiation of new rules and principles will require compromises with those countries and new actors pushing for their voices to be heard on the international scene,
ker bi morale biti naslednje dejavnosti v osrčju zunanjih ukrepov EU: spodbujanje demokracije in spoštovanja človekovih pravic, zlasti pravic žensk in otrok, svobode izražanja, pravne države, krepitve varnosti, demokratične stabilnosti, napredka ter poštene razdelitve dohodka, bogastva in priložnosti v družbi; ker bi morala biti dodatna krepitev mednarodnega sistema kazenskega prava z namenom spodbujanja odgovornosti, dokončanja prakse nekaznovanosti in spodbujanja pomembnega dela, ki ga je opravilo Mednarodno kazensko sodišče kot edina stalna in neodvisna pravosodna institucija, sestavni del vseh zunanjih ukrepov EU,
whereas the promotion of democracy and human rights, specifically women's and children's rights and freedom of expression, the rule of law, strengthening of security, democratic stability, prosperity, and a fair distribution of income, wealth and opportunities in society should be at the core of all EU external action; whereas a further strengthening of the international criminal justice system, to promote accountability and put an end to impunity, and the promotion of the important work of the International Criminal Court (ICC) as the only permanent and independent judicial institution, should be an integral part of all EU external action,
ugotavlja, da so mehanizmi EU za doseganje soglasja in usklajeno delovanje zgled za mednarodni red na podlagi pravil, zato poudarja, da mora EU sodelovati z vodilnimi silami v regiji ter dejavno sodelovati pri oblikovanju in izboljšanju mednarodnega okolja, ki bo EU omogočilo uspešno spodbujanje vrednot in interesov, kakor zahteva pogodba; meni, da je, če želi Evropska unija biti svetovni akter in ohraniti svoje mesto ter okrepiti notranjo usklajenost, ki je nujna za zagovarjanje enotnega stališča, zlasti na področjih, kjer ima izključne ali deljene pristojnosti, bistvena njena sposobnost oblikovati večstransko sodelovanje oziroma voditi skupno ukrepanje pri odgovarjanju na mednarodne izzive, zlasti na tiste, ki nastajajo zaradi odgovornosti na področju zaščite in zaradi potrebe po izboljšanju varnosti ljudi kot sredstev za doseganje globalne varnosti;
Notes that the EU's mechanisms for building consensus and taking concerted action make it a model for a rules-based international order and therefore stresses the need for the EU to cooperate with leading regional powers and actively participate in the building and improvement of an international environment that enables the EU to promote, as required by the Treaty, its values and interests; in particular in those fields where it has exclusive or shared competences, considers essential, with regard to the EU's aspiration and need to be an effective global actor and to safeguard its position, a strengthening of the internal coordination necessary to speak with one voice, the ability to shape multilateral cooperation and lead collective action in addressing international challenges, namely those arising from the responsibility to protect, and the need to enhance human security as a means of achieving global security;
poudarja strmo naraščanje števila političnih in humanitarnih kriz v svetu, kar zahteva boljše večstranske ukrepe EU in njihovo večjo usmerjenost v preventivno delovanje; zato poudarja, da mora EU izkoristiti trenutne razmere in bolje uporabiti svoje instrumente za zunanjo politiko, da bi bolje izkoristila svoj vpliv v mednarodnih organizacijah in prevzela vodilno vlogo pri učinkovitejšem reševanju sedanjih in prihodnjih mednarodnih kriz;
Underlines the sharp increase in political and humanitarian crises in the world, which calls for improved and more preventive EU multilateral action; highlights, therefore, the need for the EU to seize the moment and make better use of its foreign policy instruments so as to ensure better use of its leverage in multilateral organisations and to take the lead in addressing current and future international crises more effectively;
meni, da je treba nedržavne akterje dodatno vključiti v večstransko oblikovanje politik ter spodbujati in olajšati boljše posvetovanje z organizacijami civilne družbe in s socialnimi partnerji v prihodnjih strukturah upravljanja mednarodnih organizacij; priznava, da so njihovi viri, strokovno znanje in domet ključni za povečanje verodostojnosti in učinkovitosti večstranskega sodelovanja; opozarja, da je treba pri reševanju kriznih razmer uporabiti pristop od spodaj navzgor;
Believes there is a need to further involve non-state actors in multilateral policy-making, to promote and facilitate improved consultation of civil society organisations and social partners in the future governance structures of international organisations; recognises their expertise, resources and outreach as key to enhancing the legitimacy and effectiveness of multilateral cooperation; recalls that a bottom-up approach is needed to address crisis situations;
poudarja, da bi morala EU s krepitvijo sodelovanja, izboljšanjem institucij in pritegnitvijo vseh zainteresiranih strani prevzeti dejavno in vodilno vlogo v reformi svetovnega upravljanja, da bi bile mednarodne institucije in organizacije legitimnejše, učinkovitejše in bolj naklonjene skupni odgovornosti, ter okrepiti svoj položaj, uresničevati zadane cilje in prednostne naloge ter spodbujati načela, vrednote in interese za oblikovanje tega procesa; vztraja, da morata podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica in Komisija v tesnem sodelovanju z Evropskim parlamentom redno ocenjevati svoj prispevek k reformi svetovnega upravljanja in preučiti, kako reforme lahko koristijo EU pri opredeljevanju in vzpostavljanju njene večje vloge;
Stresses that the EU – by enhancing cooperation, improving institutions and engaging all stakeholders – should play an active and leading role in global governance reform to make international institutions and organisations more legitimate, effective and conducive to shared responsibility, while strengthening its position, pursuing its objectives and priorities and promoting its principles, values and interests to shape this process; insists that the VP/HR and the Commission should, in close cooperation with the European Parliament, periodically evaluate their contribution to global governance reform and how reforms can be beneficial to the EU in identifying and establishing a stronger role for itself;
meni, da bi morale države članice na Evropsko unijo vse bolj gledati kot na sredstvo za povečanje moči pri doseganju lastnih ciljev, ki jih sicer same ne bi mogle doseči, in ji kot taki zaupati, ter da govorjenje EU z enim glasom ne povečuje le njihovih možnosti za uspeh, temveč tudi legitimnost in verodostojnost EU kot pomembnega mednarodnega akterja v nastajajočem medpolarnem svetu;
Takes the view that EU Member States should increasingly consider and rely on the EU as a multiplier of power in achieving the objectives they cannot achieve independently, and that speaking with one EU voice not only increases the chances of success but also improves the legitimacy and credibility of the EU as an important international actor in the emerging interpolar world;
poudarja, da je treba pri zunanjem zastopanju uporabiti strateški pristop in jasno utemeljitev ter oblikovati posebno strategijo EU za vsako večstransko organizacijo, da bi povečali vlogo EU in okrepili njen položaj; poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico in Komisijo, naj pripravita belo knjigo o vlogi EU v večstranskih organizacijah, v kateri bi predlagala poglobljen in strateški pristop za bližnjo in srednjeročno prihodnost do leta 2020;
Underlines the need to apply a strategic approach and a coherent rationale in external representation by developing a tailored EU strategy vis-à-vis each multilateral organisation aimed at enhancing the EU's role and strengthening of its position; asks the VP/HR and the Commission to draw up a White Paper on the role of the EU in multilateral organisations which proposes a comprehensive and strategic approach both for the short run and the medium-term future through to 2020;
opozarja, da je vloga podpredsednice/visoke predstavnice, da zastopa diplomacijo Evropske unije in podaja stališča v njenem imenu, zato bi moral biti njen položaj v večstranskih organizacijah uveljavljen;
Recalls that the role of the VP/HR is to represent, and be the voice of, European Union diplomacy and that for this reason her position must be affirmed in multilateral organisations;
poziva Evropsko unijo in države članice, naj sistematično in strateško pregledajo sedanjo ureditev vloge in institucionalne zastopanosti Unije v večstranskih organizacijah ter naj poiščejo načine, kako bi lahko postopno okrepili njeno zunanje zastopanje v skladu z obsegom pristojnosti in institucionalnimi novostmi iz Lizbonske pogodbe ter vzpostavili novo ravnovesje med institucijami Unije in državami članicami; poleg tega poziva EU in države članice, naj opredelijo organe, v katerih je sedanje stanje zastarelo, neobičajno in neučinkovito ter ga je treba ponovno pretehtati in spremeniti; zato poudarja, da je potrebna večja usklajenost med različnimi vrstami statusa EU v večstranskih organizacijah in pogodbenih shemah zaradi institucionalne doslednosti, ter poziva Svet, naj pripravi jasen okvir;
Calls on the EU and its Member States to systematically and strategically review the present arrangements for the role and institutional representation of the Union in multilateral organisations and to find ways in which the external representation of the EU can be progressively strengthened in line with the extent of its competences and the institutional innovations of the Treaty of Lisbon, with the striking of new balances between the EU institutions and its Member States; in addition, urges the EU and its Member States to identify the bodies where the status quo arrangements are obsolete, anomalous or inefficient, and deserve reconsideration and change; therefore emphasises the need for more consistency regarding the different types of the EU's status in multilateral organisations and treaty schemes as a matter of institutional logic, and calls upon the Council to draft a clear framework;
meni, da v današnjem času fiskalne strogosti in zmanjševanja proračuna evropsko sodelovanje ni možnost, ampak nujnost; pozdravlja ekonomijo obsega z namenom posodobiti, racionalizirati in združiti kolektivno diplomacijo držav članic prek Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje, Komisije in delegacij EU, cilj pa je odpraviti nepotrebne postopkovne zaplete in drago podvajanje navzočnosti na mnogih mednarodnih forumih; meni, da je za ta prizadevanja nujno pridobiti podporo drugih članic večstranskih organizacij, za kar so potrebne skrbne priprave;
Considers that in the current times of fiscal austerity and budget cuts European cooperation is not an option but a necessity; welcomes economies of scale aimed at upgrading, rationalising and concentrating Member States’ collective diplomacy through the EEAS, the Commission and EU Delegations with the objective of eliminating unnecessary procedural complications and expensive duplication of presences in many international fora; considers it essential, in this regard, to gain support for this endeavour from other members of multilateral organisations, which requires careful preparation;
meni, da bi morala biti EU kot splošno pravilo in v skladu z duhom Lizbonske pogodbe v primeru izključnih pristojnosti vodilni akter s polnopravnim članstvom v posamezni večstranski organizaciji, države članice pa bi bile lahko, a ne nujno, navzoče kot članice, vendar običajno ne v neodvisni vlogi; meni, da bi morale države članice, če bodo ohranile nacionalno zastopstvo v organizacijah, v katerih ima EU izključne pristojnosti, podpreti stališče, ki ga je EU izrazila v njihovem imenu; prav tako meni, da bi v primeru prevlade deljenih pristojnosti Unije moralo veljati pravilo, da so članice tako Unija kot njene države članice, pri čemer pa bi se bilo treba izogniti razhajanjem pri glasovanju EU in posameznih držav članic;
Takes the view that, as a general rule and in the spirit of the Lisbon Treaty, in cases of exclusive competences the EU should be the pre-eminent actor with full membership of the given multilateral organisation while its Member States may also – but need not necessarily – be present as members, but usually without an independent role; takes the view that, if Member States keep their national representation in organisations where the EU enjoys exclusive competences, they should support the position expressed by the EU speaking on their behalf; takes the view, furthermore, that where shared Union competences prevail the norm should be for the EU and its Member States both to be members, while avoiding different voting behaviours by the EU and individual Member States;