natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 27. oktobra 2011 o letnem poročilu o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2010 ( 2011/2106(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 27 October 2011 on the Annual Report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2010 ( 2011/2106(INI) )
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2010,
having regard to the Annual Report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2010,
ob upoštevanju tretjega odstavka člena 24, člena 228 in člena 298 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
having regard to Article 24, third paragraph, Article 228, and Article 298 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z 18. junija 2008 UL C 286 E, 27.11.2009, str.
having regard to its resolution of 18 June 2008 OJ C 286 E, 27.11.2009, p.
o sprejetju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta, ki spreminja Sklep Evropskega parlamenta 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom z dne 9. marca 1994 o predpisih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha človekovih pravic,
on the adoption of a decision of the European Parliament amending its Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties,
ob upoštevanju izvedbenih določb statuta evropskega varuha človekovih pravic z dne 1. januarja 2009 Sprejete 8. julija 2002 in spremenjene s sklepi evropskega varuha človekovih pravic 5. aprila 2004 in 3. decembra 2008.
having regard to the implementing provisions of the Statute of the Ombudsman of 1 January 2009 Adopted on 8 July 2002 and amended by decisions of the Ombudsman of 5 April 2004 and 3 December 2008.
ob upoštevanju drugega in tretjega stavka člena 205(2) Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 205(2), second and third sentences, of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A7-0285/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0285/2011 ),
ker je bilo letno poročilo o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2010 uradno posredovano predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta dne 10. maja 2011 in ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamanduros predstavil svoje poročilo Odboru za peticije 23. maja 2011 v Bruslju,
whereas the Annual Report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2010 was formally submitted to the President of Parliament on 10 May 2011 and the Ombudsman, Mr Nikiforos Diamandouros, presented the report to the Committee on Petitions in Brussels on 23 May 2011,
ker člen 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah določa, da ima vsakdo pravico, da institucije in organi Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku,
whereas Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights states that ‘Every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union’,
ker so skupna zunanja politika, varnostna politika in odgovornosti Evropskega sveta v pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic,
whereas the common foreign policy, the security policy and the responsibilities of the European Council fall within the Ombudsman's remit,
ker člen 43 Listine navaja, da imajo vsaka državljanka in vsak državljan Unije ter vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic pravico, da se glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij ali organov Skupnosti obrnejo na varuha človekovih pravic, razen glede Sodišča v njegovi pravosodni funkciji,
whereas Article 43 of the Charter states that ‘Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice acting in its judicial role’,
ker je uveljavitev Lizbonske pogodbe uvedla pravno podlago za skupna pravila upravnih postopkov v institucijah, organih, uradih in agencijah EU, katere v skladu s členom 298 PDEU „podpira odprta, učinkovita in neodvisna evropska uprava“, in ker vpliva na delo Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, med drugim zaradi ustanovitve Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje in dejstva, da je Evropski svet postal ena od institucij EU,
whereas the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty introduced a legal basis for common rules on administrative procedures within the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, which pursuant to Article 298 of the TFEU ‘shall have the support of an open, efficient and independent European administration’, as well as having an impact on the work of the European Ombudsman, inter alia as a result of the establishment of the European External Action Service and the fact that the European Council has become an EU institution,
ker do nepravilnosti pride, kadar javni organ ne deluje v skladu z zanj zavezujočimi pravili ali načeli,
whereas maladministration occurs when a public body fails to act in accordance with a rule or principle which is binding upon it,
ker je Parlament na plenarnem zasedanju 20. januarja 2010 v Strasbourgu ponovno izvolil Nikiforosa Diamandurosa za evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, ki je 25. oktobra 2010 prisegel pred Sodiščem Evropske unije v Luksemburgu,
whereas Mr Diamandouros was re-elected European Ombudsman by Parliament in its plenary session in Strasbourg on 20 January 2010 and took his oath before the Court of Justice in Luxembourg on 25 October 2010,
ker je institucija evropskega varuha človekovih pravic 27. septembra 2010 praznovala petnajsto obletnico; ker je varuh človekovih pravic v tem desetletju in pol odgovoril več kot 36 000 pritožnikom in zaključil več kot 3800 preiskav morebitnih nepravilnosti,
whereas on 27 September 2010 the European Ombudsman institution celebrated its fifteenth anniversary; whereas in this decade and a half the Ombudsman has answered more than 36 000 complainants and completed more than 3 800 inquiries into possible maladministration,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic izkoristil petnajsto obletnico institucije za začetek nove strategije za svoj mandat 2009–2014; ker so cilji te strategije prisluhniti zainteresiranim stranem, hitreje dosegati rezultate, pozitivno vplivati na upravno kulturo Unije, zainteresiranim stranem in javnosti zagotavljati pravočasne in koristne informacije ter stalno tehtati uporabo razpoložljivih sredstev,
whereas the Ombudsman used the fifteenth anniversary of his institution to launch a new strategy for his 2009-2014 mandate; whereas this strategy focuses on listening to stakeholders, delivering results faster, impacting positively on the Union's administrative culture, providing timely and useful information to stakeholders and the public, and rethinking constantly the use of the resources available,
ker je bilo v letu 2010 na varuha človekovih pravic naslovljenih 2667 pritožb; ker to pomeni več kot 400 pritožb manj v primerjavi z letom 2009,
whereas in 2010 the Ombudsman received 2 667 complaints; whereas this represents a decline of more than 400 compared to 2009,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 zaključil 326 preiskav (leta 2009 pa 318), od katerih je bilo 323 začetih na podlagi pritožb; ker se je povprečni čas, potreben za končanje preiskav, v letih 2009 in 2010 skrajšal s 13 mesecev v letu 2008 na 9 mesecev; ker je bila večina preiskav zaključena v enem letu (66 %), več kot polovica (52 %) pa v treh mesecih,
whereas in 2010 the Ombudsman completed 326 inquiries (318 in 2009) of which 323 were based on complaints; whereas the average time required for completing inquiries fell from 13 months in 2008 to 9 months in 2009 and 2010; whereas most of the inquiries were completed within one year (66 %) and over half (52 %) were completed within three months,
ker lahko varuh človekovih pravic začne preiskave na lastno pobudo, če želi preiskati domnevne primere nepravilnosti na podlagi pritožbe nepooblaščene osebe ali če obstaja verjetnost sistemske težave v institucijah; ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 končal tri in začel šest preiskav na lastno pobudo,
whereas the Ombudsman can launch own-initiative inquiries when he intends to investigate a possible case of maladministration based on a complaint by a non-authorised person or when there appears to be a systemic problem in the institutions; whereas the Ombudsman completed three and opened six own-initiative inquiries in 2010,
ker je 65 % preiskav, odprtih leta 2010, zadevalo Evropsko komisijo (leta 2009 56 %), 10 % Evropski urad za izbor osebja (EPSO), 7 % Evropski parlament, 2 % Svet Evropske unije in 1 % Sodišče Evropske unije,
whereas 65 % of inquiries opened in 2010 concerned the European Commission (56 % in 2009), 10 % concerned the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), 7 % the European Parliament, 2 % the Council of the European Union, and 1 % the Court of Justice of the European Union,
ker so v več kot polovici zadev (55 %), zaključenih leta 2010, zadevne institucije sprejele sporazumno rešitev ali zadevo rešile,
whereas in over half (55 %) of the cases closed in 2010 the institution concerned accepted a friendly solution or settled the matter,
ker lahko varuh človekovih pravic izda dodatne pripombe, če se pri obravnavi zadeve pojavi priložnost za izboljšanje kakovosti uprave; ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 izdal dodatne pripombe v 14 zadevah (v primerjavi z 28 leta 2009), da bi izboljšal kakovost storitev, ki se zagotavljajo državljanom,
whereas the Ombudsman may issue a further remark if, in dealing with a case, an opportunity to enhance the quality of the administration is identified; whereas the Ombudsman issued further remarks in 14 cases in 2010 (down from 28 in 2009) with a view to enhancing the quality of the service provided to citizens,
ker se kritična ocena pripravi, kadar (i) pristojna institucija ne more več odpraviti nepravilnosti, (ii) kadar nepravilnost nima splošnih posledic ali (iii) kadar ni potrebno nadaljnje ukrepanje varuha človekovih pravic,
whereas a critical remark is made in cases where (i) it is no longer possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the maladministration, (ii) where the maladministration has no general implications or (iii) where no follow-up by the Ombudsman is deemed necessary,
ker kritična ocena pritožniku potrdi, da je njegova pritožba upravičena, instituciji pa nakaže, kje je storila napako, kar pripomore k preprečevanju nepravilnosti v prihodnje; ker se je v zadnjih nekaj letih število kritičnih ocen nenehno zmanjševalo ter je padlo s 44 leta 2008 na 35 leta 2009 in 33 leta 2010,
whereas a critical remark confirms to the complainant that the complaint was justified and indicates to the institution what it has done wrong, so it can avoid maladministration in the future; whereas over the last few years the number of critical remarks has been showing a continual decrease, falling from 44 in 2008 and 35 in 2009 to 33 in 2010,
ker se osnutek priporočila izda, če je potrebno nadaljnje ukrepanje varuha človekovih pravic, če je mogoče nepravilnost odpraviti ali če je nepravilnost posebej resna ali ima splošne posledice,
whereas a draft recommendation is issued in cases where follow-up action by the Ombudsman is necessary, where the maladministration can be eliminated or where the maladministration is particularly serious or has general implications,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 ugotovil nepravilnosti v 12 % zadev (40); ker je z izdajo osnutkov priporočil dosegel pozitivne rezultate v sedmih od teh zadev,
whereas the Ombudsman identified instances of maladministration in 12 % of the cases (40) in 2010; whereas he obtained positive outcomes in seven of these cases by making draft recommendations,
ker lahko varuh, če se institucija ali organ na osnutek priporočila ne odzove zadovoljivo, Evropskemu parlamentu pošlje posebno poročilo,
whereas if an institution or body fails to respond satisfactorily to a draft recommendation, the Ombudsman may send a special report to the European Parliament,
ker je posebno poročilo varuhovo orožje v skrajni sili in je zadnji bistveni korak, ki ga stori pri obravnavi zadeve, saj je sprejetje resolucije in izvajanje parlamentarnih pooblastil stvar politične presoje Parlamenta,
whereas a special report constitutes the Ombudsman's ultimate weapon and is the last substantive step he takes in dealing with a case, since the adoption of a resolution and the exercise of Parliament's powers are matters for the political judgment of the Parliament,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 predložil Parlamentu eno posebno poročilo,
whereas the Ombudsman submitted one special report to Parliament in 2010,
odobri letno poročilo za leto 2010, ki ga je predložil Evropski varuh človekovih pravic; čestita varuhu človekovih pravic ob njegovi ponovni izvolitvi januarja 2010;
Approves the Annual Report for 2010 presented by the European Ombudsman; congratulates the Ombudsman on his re-election in January 2010;
poudarja, da so preglednost, dostop do informacij in spoštovanje pravic evropskih državljanov bistveni predpogoji za ohranjanje zaupanja med državljani in institucijami;
Stresses that transparency, access to information and respect for the rights of European citizens are essential preconditions for maintaining trust between citizens and the institutions;
meni, da vloga varuha človekovih pravic pri spodbujanju preglednosti in odgovornosti v postopku odločanja in upravljanja v Evropski uniji pomembno prispeva k oblikovanju Unije, v kateri se odločitve sprejemajo „v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani“, kot je opredeljeno v členu 1(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji;
Considers the role of the Ombudsman in enhancing openness and accountability in the decision-making processes and administration of the European Union as an essential contribution towards a Union in which decisions are taken ‘as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen’, as provided for in Article 1(2) of the Treaty on European Union;
opozarja, da je institucija evropskega varuha človekovih pravic 27. septembra 2010 praznovala petnajsto obletnico; ugotavlja, da je varuh človekovih pravic v teh petnajstih letih odgovoril na več kot 36 000 pritožb in bistveno pomagal evropskim institucijam pri izboljševanju stanja in povečevanju kakovosti uprave;
Recalls that the European Ombudsman institution on 27 September 2010 celebrated its fifteenth anniversary; notes that over these fifteen years the Ombudsman has responded to more than 36 000 complaints and played a major role in helping the European institutions to provide redress and to raise the quality of their administration;
ugotavlja, da so izkušnje, pridobljene v teh petnajstih letih delovanja, omogočile instituciji varuha človekovih pravic dejanski vpogled v trende na področju nepravilnosti, sistemskih težav in strukturnih pomanjkljivosti v upravi, tako da lahko usmerja uprave, da se izogibajo ponavljanju napak ter izboljšajo kakovost in preglednost svojega dela;
Notes that the experience of these fifteen years of activity has provided the Ombudsman institution with a real insight into trends in maladministration, systemic problems and structural weaknesses in administrations, which enables it to provide guidance for administrations with a view to avoiding the repetition of mistakes and improving the quality and transparency of their work;
pozdravlja pobudo varuha človekovih pravic, da bo redno objavljal študije, v katerih bo preučeval nadaljnje ukrepanje institucij EU na podlagi njegovih kritičnih ocen in dodatnih pripomb; ugotavlja, da je bila leta 2009 splošna stopnja zadovoljivih nadaljnjih ukrepov 81 % (94 % v primeru dodatnih pripomb in 70 % pri kritičnih ocenah); meni, da je tak razvoj spodbuden; vendar tudi meni, da obstaja možnost izboljšanja, zlasti v zvezi s stopnjo za kritične ocene; poziva institucije, naj sodelujejo z varuhom človekovih pravic pri izboljšanju stopnje nadaljnjih ukrepov;
Welcomes the Ombudsman's initiative to regularly publish studies in which he examines the EU institutions' follow-up to his critical and further remarks; notes that the overall rate of satisfactory follow-up in 2009 was 81 % (94 % in the case of further remarks and 70 % for the critical remarks); considers this to be an encouraging development; considers nevertheless that there is room for improvement, especially with regard to the rate for critical remarks; urges the institutions to work together with the Ombudsman to improve their follow-up rate;
pozdravlja splošno konstruktivno sodelovanje varuha človekovih pravic z institucijami in organi EU; potrjuje njegovo vlogo zunanjega nadzornega mehanizma in dragocenega vira za nenehno izboljševanje evropske uprave;
Welcomes the generally constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU institutions and bodies; endorses the Ombudsman in his role of external control mechanism and as a valuable source of ongoing improvement to European administration;
želi pohvaliti novi logotip in vizualno podobo institucije varuha človekovih pravic ter nov videz letnega poročila ter čestita varuhu človekovih pravic, da je povečal preglednost svoje institucije z objavljanjem informacij o vseh novih preiskavah, ki jih odpira na podlagi pritožb, na njeni spletni strani;
Commends the Ombudsman on his institution's new logo and visual identity as well as on his new-look Annual Report, commends the Ombudsman also for enhancing his institution's transparency by publishing on his website information about all new inquiries he is opening into complaints;
poudarja, da morajo biti državljani bolje obveščeni o načinu delovanja te institucije in informacijski spletni strani, ki zagotavlja preglednost vloge varuha človekovih pravic;
Stresses the need for citizens to be better informed about the modus operandi of the institution and the information website that validates the transparency of the Ombudsman's role;
predlaga, da bi morali biti na seji Odbora za peticije, na kateri varuh človekovih pravic predstavi svoje letno poročilo, poleg predstavnikov Evropske komisije navzoči tudi predstavniki zadevnih uprav Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in drugih institucij, agencij, služb in organov EU, ki so predmet preiskave, posebnega poročila, kritičnih ocen ali drugih ukrepov varuha človekovih pravic, da bi komentirali poročilo in sodelovali v razpravi; poziva predstavnike uprave Parlamenta, Sveta in drugih zadevnih institucij, agencij in organov EU, naj bodo navzoči na prihodnjih sejah, na katerih bo predstavljeno letno poročilo varuha človekovih pravic in bo potekala razprava o njem; meni, da bi slednji s svojo udeležbo na takšnih razpravah in z deljenjem svojih pogledov o dobrem upravljanju in težavah, premaganih s pomočjo priporočil in pripomb Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, lahko pripomogli k izboljšanju storitev za državljane EU in medinstitucionalnega dialoga ter prispevali k vzpostavitvi prave kulture storitev;
Suggests that when the Ombudsman presents his annual report in a meeting of the Committee on Petitions, not only representatives of the European Commission but also of the respective administrations of the European Parliament, the Council and other EU institutions, agencies, services and bodies that have been the subject of an investigation, a special report, critical remarks or other measures taken by the Ombudsman should be present to comment on the report and take part in the discussion; urges the administrations of Parliament, the Council and the other EU institutions, agencies and bodies concerned to be represented in future meetings when the Ombudsman's annual report is presented and discussed; believes that their participation in such discussions and the sharing of their views on good administration and on the problems overcome as a result of the European Ombudsman's recommendations and remarks could help to improve the service provided to EU citizens and interinstitutional dialogue and contribute to the establishment of a genuine service culture;
poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj Parlament stalno obvešča o novostih v zvezi z njegovimi odnosi z novo Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje in Evropskim svetom;
Calls on the Ombudsman to keep Parliament informed of developments in his relations with the new European External Action Service and the European Council;
ugotavlja, da je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 prejel 2667 pritožb državljanov, podjetij, združenj, nevladnih organizacij in regionalnih pisarn; ugotavlja, da to pomeni več kot 400 manj pritožb kot lani;
Notes that in 2010 the Ombudsman received 2 667 complaints from citizens, companies, associations, NGOs and regional offices; notes that this represents a decline of more than 400 compared to the previous year;
se strinja, da je mogoče to zmanjšanje nedopustnih pritožb delno pripisati interaktivnemu vodiču, ki je bil leta 2009 uveden na spletni strani varuha človekovih pravic in ki učinkovito pomaga usmerjati pritožnike na organ, ki jim lahko najbolj pomaga;
Concurs that this decline in inadmissible complaints can be attributed in part to the interactive guide which was introduced on the Ombudsman's website in 2009 and which effectively helps direct complainants to the body best placed to help them;
spodbuja evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, naj še naprej podpira evropsko mrežo varuhov človekovih pravic, da se razvijeta obsežna podatkovna zbirka in boljše obveščanje državljanov EU o porazdelitvi odgovornosti med evropskim in nacionalnimi varuhi človekovih pravic ter Odborom za peticije Parlamenta;
Encourages the European Ombudsman to continue to promote the European Network of Ombudsmen with a view to developing a comprehensive data base and better informing EU citizens about the apportionment of responsibilities between the European Ombudsman, national ombudsmen and Parliament's Committee on Petitions;
poudarja, da mora Parlament nameniti sredstva za vzpostavitev podobnega spletnega portala za svoj Odbor za peticije, da bi se okrepila vidnost in preglednost naše institucije, tako da bi lahko prispevala tudi k zmanjšanju števila nedopustnih peticij ter hkrati usmerjala predlagatelje peticij in jim svetovala ter izboljšala učinkovitost in uspešnost postopka za peticije;
Emphasises that Parliament itself must release resources to put in place a similar web portal for its Committee on Petitions to enhance the institution's visibility and transparency in order that it may also contribute to a reduction in the number of inadmissible petitions while at the same time providing guidance and advice to petitioners and improving the efficiency and the effectiveness of the petitions process;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da se je trajno zmanjšalo število kritičnih ocen (33 leta 2010, 35 leta 2009, 44 leta 2008 in 55 leta 2007), ki jih je izdal varuh človekovih pravic; sklepa, da to dokazuje, da institucije EU zavzemajo bolj proaktivno vlogo pri reševanju pritožb in da je varuh človekovih pravic v očeh teh institucij s svojo učinkovitostjo pridobil določeno mero legitimnosti;
Notes with satisfaction the sustained reduction in critical remarks (33 in 2010, 35 in 2009, 44 in 2008 and 55 in 2007) issued by the Ombudsman; concurs that this is evidence that the EU institutions are taking a more pro-active role in resolving complaints and that the Ombudsman's effectiveness has earned him a degree of legitimacy in the eyes of those institutions;
varuhu človekovih pravic čestita za dejstvo, da se povprečni čas, potreben za zaključek preiskav, neprestano krajša (približno 9 mesecev v letih 2009 in 2010); zahteva, da se uporabijo ustrezni ukrepi, da se ta čas še skrajša, da bi se tako bolje izpolnila pričakovanja državljanov EU;
Congratulates the Ombudsman on the fact that the average time required for completing inquiries is becoming shorter and shorter (approximately nine months in 2009 and 2010); requests that the necessary means are used to reduce it still further in order to be more able to better meet the expectations of EU citizens;