natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je generalni sekretar Organizacije združenih narodov Ban Ki Mun dejal, da bi bil vesel, če bi madžarska vlada zaprosila za nasvet in priporočila v sami državi ter pri Svetu Evrope ali Organizaciji združenih narodov, in da meni, da bi morala Madžarska kot država članica EU za nasvet in pregled nove ustave zaprositi evropske institucije,
whereas the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, has stated that he would ‘appreciate it if the Hungarian Government were to seek advice and recommendations from within the country and from the Council of Europe or the United Nations’ and takes the view that Hungary, as an EU Member State, should ask the European institutions to give advice and review the new Constitution,
poziva madžarske oblasti, naj obravnavajo vprašanja in pomisleke, ki jih je izrazila Beneška komisija, in upoštevajo njena priporočila, bodisi tako, da spremenijo novo ustavo, bodisi s prihodnjimi temeljnimi in rednimi zakoni, da bi zlasti:
Calls on the Hungarian authorities to address the issues and concerns raised by the Venice Commission and to implement its recommendations, either by amending the new Constitution or through future cardinal and ordinary laws, notably to:
– dejavno iskale soglasje za večjo preglednost in spodbujanje resničnega političnega in družbenega vključevanja ter obsežno javno razpravo o prihodnji pripravi in sprejemanju temeljnih zakonov, ki jih določa nova ustava;
(a) actively seek consensus, to ensure greater transparency and to foster genuine political and social inclusion and a broad public debate in connection with the forthcoming drafting and adoption of the cardinal laws laid down in the new Constitution;
– sprejele samo osnovni in jasno opredeljen obseg temeljnih zakonov, ki urejajo davčni in pokojninski sistem, družinsko politiko ter kulturno, versko in socialno-ekonomsko politiko, pri čemer bi prihodnjim vladam in demokratično izvoljenim predstavnikom omogočile samostojno odločanje o teh vprašanjih, ter revidirale sedanji mandat proračunskega sveta;
(b) adopt only the basic and clearly defined scope of cardinal laws regulating the tax and pension systems, family policies and cultural, religious and socio-economic policies, allowing future governments and democratically elected legislatures to take autonomous decisions on these policies; revise the current mandate of the Budget Council;
– v ustavi in njeni preambuli v skladu s členom 21 Listine o temeljnih pravicah zagotovile enako varstvo pravic za vse državljane ne glede na versko, spolno, etnično ali drugo družbeno skupino, ki jim pripadajo;
(c) guarantee equal protection of the rights of every citizen, no matter which religious, sexual, ethnic or other societal group they belong to, in accordance with Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, in the Constitution and its preamble;
– v ustavi, vključno s preambulo, izrecno zagotovile, da bo Madžarska pri iskanju podpore v tujini živečih etničnih Madžarov spoštovala ozemeljsko celovitost drugih držav;
(d) explicitly guarantee in the Constitution, including its preamble, that Hungary will respect the territorial integrity of other countries when seeking the support of ethnic Hungarians living abroad;
– znova potrdile neodvisnost pravosodja s ponovno vzpostavitvijo pravice novega madžarskega ustavnega sodišča, da brez izjeme pregleda vso zakonodajo, ki nanaša na proračun, kot to zahteva pravo, ki temelji na Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, z revizijo določbe o nižji obvezni upokojitveni starosti za sodnike ter z izrecnim jamčenjem neodvisnega upravljanja pravosodnega sistema;
(e) reaffirm the independence of the judiciary by restoring the right of the Constitutional Court to review budget-related legislation without exception, as required by ECHR-based law, by revising the provision on the lower mandatory retirement age for judges and by guaranteeing explicitly the independent management of the judicial system;
– v novi ustavi izrecno zaščitile vse temeljne državljanske in socialne pravice v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi Madžarske, prepovedale smrtno kazen, dosmrtno zaporno kazen brez možnosti pogojne izpustitve in diskriminacijo na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti, zagotovile dovolj jamstev glede zaščite temeljnih pravic ter jasno navedle, da se temeljne pravice pridobijo ob rojstvu in so brezpogojne;
(f) explicitly protect in the new Constitution all fundamental civil and social rights in line with Hungary's international obligations, ban the death penalty, life imprisonment without parole and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, provide sufficient guarantees concerning the protection of fundamental rights, and make it clear that fundamental rights are acquired at birth and are unconditional;
– zagotovile, da reorganizacija sistema parlamentarnih komisarjev ne bo razvodenila obstoječih jamstev o varovanju in spodbujanju pravic na področju varstva narodnostnih manjšin, varstva osebnih podatkov in preglednosti podatkov, ki so pomembni za javnost, ter neodvisnosti ustreznih organov, ki so pristojni za ta področja;
(g) ensure that the reorganisation of the system of parliamentary commissioners will not serve to water down the existing guarantees concerning the protection and promotion of rights in the areas of the protection of national minorities, the protection of personal data and the transparency of publicly relevant information, as well as the independence of the respective bodies responsible for these areas;
– zagotovile, da vključitev Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah v novo ustavo ne bo povzročala težav pri razlagi in prekrivanja pristojnosti domačih sodišč, novega madžarskega ustavnega sodišča in Sodišča Evropske unije;
(h) make sure that the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into the new Constitution does not cause problems of interpretation and overlapping competences between domestic courts, the new Hungarian Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice;
svojim pristojnim odborom naroča, naj zadevo spremljajo v sodelovanju z Beneško komisijo in Svetom Evrope ter naj ocenijo, ali so bila priporočila upoštevana in kako;
Instructs its relevant committees to follow up the matter, in cooperation with the Venice Commission and the Council of Europe, and to assess whether and how the recommendations have been implemented;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Svetu Evrope, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Agenciji za temeljne pravice, OVSE in generalnemu sekretarju OZN.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Council of Europe, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Fundamental Rights Agency, the OSCE and the UN Secretary General.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. julija 2011 o petem kohezijskem poročilu Komisije in strategiji za kohezijsko politiko po letu 2013 ( 2011/2035(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 5 July 2011 on the Commission's fifth Cohesion Report and the strategy for post-2013 cohesion policy ( 2011/2035(INI) )
ob upoštevanju petega poročila Komisije z dne 9. novembra 2010 z naslovom „Sklepi petega poročila o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji: prihodnost kohezijske politike“ ( KOM(2010)0642 ) (v nadaljnjem besedilu: sklepi),
having regard to the Commission communication of 9 November 2010 entitled ‘Conclusions of the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion: the future of cohesion policy’ ( COM(2010)0642 ) (hereinafter ‘the conclusions’),
ob upoštevanju petega poročila Komisije o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji z naslovom „Vlaganje v prihodnost Evrope“ z dne 9. novembra 2010 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: 5. kohezijsko poročilo),
having regard to the Commission's fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, entitled ‘Investing in Europe's future’, of 9 November 2010 (hereinafter ‘the fifth Cohesion Report’),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1783/1999 UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Regional Development Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1783/1999 OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1081/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem socialnem skladu in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1784/1999 UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the European Social Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1784/1999 OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
having regard to Council Regulation No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1084/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o ustanovitvi Kohezijskega sklada in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1164/94 UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1084/2006 of 11 July 2006 establishing a cohesion fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1085/2006 z dne 17. julija 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 of 17 July 2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1906/2006 z dne 8. decembra 2006 o določitvi pravil za udeležbo podjetij, raziskovalnih središč in univerz pri ukrepih v okviru Sedmega okvirnega programa in razširjanju rezultatov raziskav UL L 391, 30.12.2006, str.1.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of 18 December 2006 laying down the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the Seventh Framework Programme and for the dissemination of research results OJ L 391, 30.12.2006, p.1.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2007 o posledicah prihodnjih širitev za učinkovitost kohezijske politike UL C 74 E, 20.3.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2007 on the consequences of future enlargements on the effectiveness of cohesion policy OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2009 o zeleni knjigi o teritorialni koheziji in napredku razprave o prihodnji reformi kohezijske politike UL C 117 E, 6.5.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2009 on the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion and the state of debate on the future reform of cohesion policy OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o prispevku kohezijske politike k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in ciljev strategije EU 2020 UL C 161 E, 31.5.2011, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on the contribution of the cohesion policy to the achievement of Lisbon and the EU 2020 objectives OJ C 161 E, 31.5.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. septembra 2010 o evropski strategiji za gospodarski in družbeni razvoj gorskih regij, otokov in redko poseljenih območij Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0341 .
having regard to its resolution of 22 September 2010 on the European strategy for the economic and social development of mountain regions, islands and sparsely populated areas Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0341
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o prihodnosti Evropskega socialnega sklada Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0357 .
having regard to its resolution of 7 October 2010 on the future of the European Social Fund Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0357 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. junija 2011 o trenutnem stanju in prihodnji sinergiji ESRR in drugih strukturnih skladov za večjo učinkovitost Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0286 .
having regard to its resolution of 23 June 2011 on the state of play and future synergies for increased effectiveness between the ERDF and other structural funds Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0286 .
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. maja 2004 z naslovom „Okrepljeno partnerstvo za najbolj oddaljene regije“ ( KOM(2004)0343 ) in sporočila Komisije z dne 17. oktobra 2008 z naslovom „Najbolj oddaljene regije: prednost Evrope“ ( KOM(2008)0642 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 26 May 2004 entitled ‘A stronger partnership for the outermost regions’ (COM (2004)0343) and the Commission communication of 17 October 2008 entitled ‘The outermost regions: an asset for Europe’ ( COM(2008)0642 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 3. marca 2010 z naslovom „Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 6. oktobra 2010 z naslovom „Prispevek regionalne politike k pametni rasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020“ ( KOM(2010)0553 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 6 October 2010 entitled ‘Regional policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020’ ( COM(2010)0553 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. januarja 2011 z naslovom „Prispevek regionalne politike k trajnostni rasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020“ ( KOM(2011)0017 ),
having regard to the Commission communication 26 January 2011 entitled ‘Regional policy contributing to sustainable growth in Europe 2020’ ( COM(2011)0017 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za splošne zadeve z dne 21. februarja 2011 o petem poročilu o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji (6738/11),
having regard to the General Affairs Council's conclusions of 21 February 2011 on the fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion (6738/11),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 1. aprila 2011 o petem poročilu o koheziji (CdR 369/2010),
having regard to the Committee of the Regions' opinion of 1 April 2011 on the fifth Cohesion Report (CdR 369/2010),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za proračunski nadzor in Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A7-0222/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A7-0222/2011 ),
ker kohezijska politika EU odločilno prispeva k opaznemu povečanju produktivnosti v vseh regijah Unije v preteklem in tekočem obdobju financiranja; ker je očitno, da naknadne ocene kažejo tudi na občutno zmanjšanje ekonomskih, socialnih in regionalnih razlik; ker ta razvoj pozitivno vpliva tudi na socialno varnost in naložbe v varstvo okolja,
whereas EU cohesion policy has contributed greatly to the increased productivity achieved by all regions of the Union during the previous and current funding periods; whereas it is striking that ex-post evaluations have also shown a significant reduction of economic, social and regional disparities; whereas these developments are having equally positive effects on social security and on investment in environmental protection,
ker je bila kohezijska politika ustvarjena kot nasprotje enotnega trga in za pospeševanje razvoja inovativne in solidarne Evrope, ki ščiti pred izzivi, povezanimi z globalizacijo, demografskimi spremembami ter varovanjem virov in ker je treba izkoristiti lokalne potenciale vseh regij, da se okrepita tako rast kot tudi regionalna in socialna kohezija,
whereas cohesion policy was intended to be a counterpart to the single market and to foster the development of an innovative and protective Europe based on solidarity in the face of the challenges associated with globalisation, demographic change and resource conservation, and whereas the intrinsic potential of all regions should be exploited to boost growth and regional and social cohesion,
ker je kohezijska politika za državljane izjemno pomembna, saj prinaša Evropo v vsakodnevno življenje ter zagotavlja njeno otipljivost in prepoznavnost v vsej EU,
whereas cohesion policy is an issue of genuine relevance to citizens, bringing Europe into people's daily lives and making it tangible and visible across the EU,
ker sta se kohezijska in strukturna politika v kriznih razmerah izkazali kot prilagodljivi in sta lahko odločilno prispevali k različnim nacionalnim načrtom za oživitev gospodarstva in programom usposabljanja in ker je pomembno ohraniti to prilagodljivost,
whereas the cohesion and structural policies have proved flexible in crisis situations and have made a crucial contribution to various national economic stimulus and training programmes, and whereas it is important to maintain this flexibility,
ker evropska strukturna politika pomembno prispeva k premagovanju gospodarske in finančne krize, saj njena usmeritev v inovacije in odpravljanje razlik evropskim regijam odločilno spodbuja k izboljšanju infrastrukture, krepitvi regionalne inovativnosti ter okoljsko trajnostnemu razvoju,
whereas European structural policy is making a major contribution towards overcoming the economic and financial crisis, as it tends to be oriented towards innovation and removing disparities, strongly encouraging European regions to upgrade infrastructure, increase regional innovation potential and boost environmentally sustainable development,
ker se je usmeritev strukturnih skladov na cilje lizbonske strategije izkazala kot dobra, kar dokazujejo visoke stopnje odobritev za sprejem obveznosti pri ciljih „konvergenca“ ter „regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje“, in ker je 20 % projektov evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja v skladu z lizbonskimi cilji,
whereas gearing the Structural Funds to the Lisbon Strategy objectives has proved effective, as is evident from the impressive commitment rates for the Convergence and Regional Competitiveness and Employment objectives, and whereas 20% of European Territorial Cooperation projects are in keeping with the Lisbon aims,
ker je cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja spodbujati ozemlja in regije k sodelovanju, da bi se skupaj odzvali na skupne izzive, zmanjšali fizične, upravne in zakonske ovire, ki ovirajo to sodelovanje, ter omilili „učinek meje“,
whereas territorial cooperation aims to help territories and regions work together in tackling their common challenges, reduce the physical, administrative and regulatory barriers to such cooperation and lessen the ‘border effect’,
ker delnega neuspeha lizbonske strategije ni povzročilo nezadostno izvajanje kohezijske politike ampak predvsem odsotnost upravljanja na več ravneh ter sprejemanja te strategije na regionalni in lokalni ravni, posledice finančne krize in pomanjkljivo izvajanje notranjega trga, premajhna proračunska disciplina in neprimerni makroekonomski okvirni pogoji v posameznih državah članicah;
whereas the partial failure of the Lisbon Strategy is due not to inadequate implementation of cohesion policy but rather to the lack of multi-level governance and of ownership of this strategy by the regional and local levels, the effects of the financial crisis, imperfect implementation of the single market, slack budgetary discipline and inadequate macroeconomic framework conditions in individual Member States,
ker so se stopnje napak in zloraba sredstev v zadnjih obdobjih financiranja občutno zmanjšale; ker je strukturna politika žal še naprej področje z visoko stopnjo takih nepravilnosti in ker nekatere države članice še vedno nimajo učinkovitih mehanizmov proti zlorabi sredstev in za izterjavo nepravilno izplačanih zneskov; ker se nepravilnosti iz malomarnosti ali namenoma ne sporočajo in ker je treba upoštevati, da je mogoče velik del napak kohezijske politike pripisati zakonskim zahtevam zunaj njenega okvira, na področjih, kot so javna naročila, okolje in državna pomoč,
whereas the error rates and misuse of funds has been significantly lower in the most recent funding periods; whereas, regrettably, structural policy nonetheless remains an area with a high level of irregularities in this respect, and some Member States still lack effective machinery for countering the misuse of funding and recovering money wrongly paid out; whereas irregularities may not be reported, either through negligence or deliberately, and whereas it must be noted that a significant part of the errors in the cohesion policy sphere may be attributed to legislative requirements outside cohesion policy, in areas such as public procurement, environment and state aids,
ker se je obstoječi sistem ciljev kohezijske in strukturne politike (konvergenca, regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje ter evropsko čezmejno sodelovanje) v kombinaciji z upravljanjem na več ravneh, horizontalnimi cilji in možnostjo načrtovanja na osnovi zanesljivega financiranja in sprejetega programskega obdobja (sedem let) na splošno izkazal kot dober, ker pa so nastale znatne zamude pri pripravi programa, ki so posledica predolgih finančnih in zakonodajnih pogajanj v postopku odločanja EU ter bistvenih sprememb pravil, ki veljajo za kohezijsko politiko,
whereas the existing system of cohesion and structural policy objectives (Convergence, Regional Competitiveness and Employment, and European Territorial Cooperation), combined with a multi-level governance approach, horizontal objectives and security to plan on the basis of reliable funding and an agreed time frame (seven years), has, overall, proved its worth, but whereas there have been considerable delays in programme planning as a result of protracted financial and legislative negotiations in the EU decision-making process and substantial changes in the rules applying to cohesion policy,
ker trajna podpora in razvoj konvergenčnih regij pozitivno vplivata na njihovo tržno povpraševanje po blagu in storitvah, s tem pa so dokazano povezani pozitivni učinki tudi za bogatejše države EU,
whereas sustained support for and development of the convergence regions has a positive impact on the demand for goods and services on their markets and thus has demonstrably beneficial effects on the wealthier EU Member States as well,
ker regionalno-gospodarska in socialna neravnovesja, prikrajšanost, povezana z lego nekaterih regij (zlasti najbolj oddaljenih regij), ter posebne strukturne težave in potreba po prilagoditvi novim izzivom še naprej terjajo celovito in s sredstvi podprto kohezijsko politiko EU v vseh evropskih regijah; ker to zahteva tudi Lizbonska pogodba,
whereas a comprehensive and well-funded EU cohesion policy in all European regions continues to be essential, given the imbalances between regional economies and in social terms and the geographical disadvantages of certain regions (particularly the outermost regions), as well as specific structural problems and the need to adapt to new challenges; whereas it is also a requirement under the Lisbon Treaty,
ker kohezijska politika glede na njen strateški pomen za prihodnost ne sme postati prilagodljiva spremenljivka na prihodnjih pogajanjih o proračunu,
whereas, given its strategic importance for the future, cohesion policy must not become an adjustment variable in future budget negotiations,
zahteva večji poudarek na evropski dodani vrednosti pri programih kohezijske in strukturne politike; meni, da je ta dodana vrednost v tem, da projekti EU prinesejo trajno ekonomsko, infrastrukturno, socialno in/ali ekološko izboljšanje statusa prikrajšanih, manj razvitih regij in tam, kjer tega ne bi bilo mogoče uresničiti brez evropskih spodbud;
Calls for cohesion and structural policy programmes to place more emphasis on European added value; deems such added value to be achieved where EU projects bring about a sustainable improvement in the economic, infrastructural, social and/or environmental status of disadvantaged, less-developed regions, and where that improvement would not have been achievable without the European stimulus;