natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je potrebna obsežnejša raziskava, da bi bolje razumeli, zakaj notranji trg ostaja razdrobljen in kako se lotiti teh težav ter kako zagotoviti izvajanje obstoječe zakonodaje,
whereas greater study is needed to further understand why the internal market remains fragmented and how best to address these problems, including how to ensure implementation of existing legislation,
ker je Komisija v omenjeni zeleni knjigi predstavila številne možnosti za instrument evropskega pogodbenega prava, ki bi lahko pomagal razviti podjetništvo in okrepiti zaupanje javnosti v enotni trg,
whereas in the above-mentioned Green Paper the Commission sets out a range of options for a European Contract Law instrument which could help develop entrepreneurship and strengthen public confidence in the Single Market,
ker je strokovna skupina za pomoč Komisiji začela pripravljati predlog za skupni referenčni okvir skupaj z okroglo mizo interesnih skupin,
whereas the Expert Group set up to assist the Commission in preparing a proposal for a Common Frame of Reference (CFR) has started work, together with a stakeholders' round table,
ker razhajanje pogodbenega prava na nacionalni ravni ni edina ovira za mala in srednja podjetja in potrošnike v zvezi s čezmejno dejavnostjo, temveč se soočajo še z drugimi težavami, kot so jezikovne prepreke, razlike v davčnih sistemih, vprašanje zanesljivosti spletnih trgovcev, omejeni dostop do širokopasovne tehnologije, digitalna pismenost, varnostni problemi, demografska sestava prebivalstva posamičnih držav članic, vprašanje varstva zasebnosti, reševanje reklamacij, pravice intelektualne lastnine itd.,
whereas the divergence of contract law at national level does not constitute the only obstacle for SMEs and consumers in respect of cross border activities since they face other problems including language barriers, different taxation systems, the question of the reliability of online traders, limited access to broadband, digital literacy, security problems, demographic composition of the population of individual Member States; privacy concerns; complaint handling, and intellectual property rights etc.,
ker po podatkih raziskave Komisije iz leta 2008 tri četrtine trgovcev prodajajo samo v svoji državi, medtem ko čezmejna prodaja pogosto poteka le v nekaj državah članicah Evrobarometer 224, 2008, str.
whereas, according to a Commission survey of 2008, three-quarters of retailers sell only domestically, and cross-border selling often takes place in a few Member States only Eurobarometer 224, 2008, p.
ker je treba razlikovati med klasičnim čezmejnim poslovanjem in e-trgovino, pri kateri obstajajo posebne težave, poslovni stroški pa so drugačni; ker je tudi za namene prihodnjih ocen učinka potrebno skrbno in natančno opredeliti, kako so sestavljeni poslovni stroški;
whereas it is necessary to distinguish between conventional cross-border transactions and e-commerce, where specific problems exist and the transaction costs are different; whereas it is also necessary for the purposes of future impact assessments, to carefully and precisely define how transaction costs are made up,
ker je jasno, da je uporaba tujega prava (za varstvo potrošnikov) v čezmejnih transakcijah po Uredbi Rim I UL L 177, 4.7.2008, str.
whereas it is clear that the application of foreign (consumer) law to cross-border transactions under the Rome-I Regulation OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p.
podjetjem, zlasti malim in srednjim, povzročila znatne poslovne stroške, ki so samo v Združenem kraljestvu bili ocenjeni na 15 000 EUR na podjetje in na državo članico Federacija malih podjetij Združenega kraljestva, Stališče o Rimu I (2007).
has been seen to entail considerable transaction costs for businesses, in particular for SMEs, which, in the UK alone have been estimated at EUR15 000 per business and per Member State UK Federation of Small Businesses, Position paper on Rome I (2007).
ker je treba pridobiti več informacij v zvezi s poslovnimi stroški, ki nastanejo zaradi izvrševanja členov 6(2) in 4(1)(a) uredbe Rim I, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se ta uredba uporablja le od decembra 2009,
whereas more information is required concerning the transaction costs resulting from the application of Article 6(2) and Article 4(1), point (a) of the Rome-I Regulation, bearing in mind that Rome I has only been applied since December 2009,
ker se ti poslovni stroški dojemajo kot velika ovira za čezmejno trgovino, kar je potrdilo 50 % evropskih trgovcev, vprašanih leta 2011, ki že trgujejo čez mejo, ki so izjavili, da bi uskladitev pravnih sistemov, ki se uporabljajo pri čezmejnih transakcijah v EU, povečala raven njihove čezmejne trgovine, medtem ko jih je 41 % reklo, da se njihova prodaja ne bi povečala; ker je, za primerjavo, 60 % trgovcev, ki ne trgujejo čez mejo, reklo, da se raven njihove čezmejne trgovine v bolj usklajenem regulativnem okolju ne bi povečala, 25 % pa jih je reklo, da bi se Flash Evrobarometer 300, 2011 http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/strategy/docs/retailers_eurobarometer_2011_en.pdf
whereas such transaction costs are perceived as being one of the important obstacles to cross-border trade, as confirmed by 50 % of European retailers already trading cross-border interviewed in 2011 who stated that harmonisation of the applicable laws in cross border transactions across the EU would increase their level of cross-border sales, and 41 % said that their sales would not increase; whereas, in comparison, among retailers not selling across border, 60 % said that their level of cross-border sales would not increase in a more harmonised regulatory environment, and 25 % said it would increase lash Eurobarometer 300, 2011 http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/strategy/docs/retailers_eurobarometer_2011_en.pdf
ker so med najbolj očitnimi ovirami v zvezi z enotnim trgom, s katerimi se srečujejo potrošniki ter mala in srednja podjetja, zapletenost pogodbenih razmerij, nepravični pogodbeni pogoji, neustrezne in pomanjkljive informacije ter neučinkoviti in dolgotrajni postopki,
whereas some of the most evident impediments that consumers and SMEs face with regard to the Single Market are complexity in contractual relations, unfair terms and conditions of contracts, inadequate and insufficient information and inefficient and time-consuming procedure,
ker je zelo pomembno, da vse pobude EU odgovorijo na dejanske potrebe in pomisleke podjetij in potrošnikov; ker se ta vprašanja nanašajo tudi na pravne/jezikovne težave (določbe o standardnih pogojih za mala podjetja v vseh jezikih EU) in težave pri izvrševanju pogodb čez mejo (avtonomni ukrepi EU na področju procesnega prava);
whereas it is of paramount importance that any initiative from the EU will have to answer real needs and concerns of both businesses and consumers; whereas these concerns also extend to legal/linguistic problems (provisions of standard terms and conditions for small businesses in all EU languages) and the difficulties in enforcing contracts across borders (provisions of autonomous EU measures in the field of procedural law),
ker je študija Komisije ocenila, da spletni trg ostaja razdrobljen: ker je raziskava pokazala, da 61 % od 10 964 testnih čezmejnih naročil ni bilo uspešnih in da čezmejno nakupovanje poveča možnosti potrošnika, da bo našel ugodnejšo ponudbo KOM(2009)0557 , str.
whereas a Commission study estimated that the online market remains fragmented: in a survey, 61 % of 10 964 test cross-border orders failed, and that cross-border shopping appears to increase consumers' chances of finding a cheaper offer COM(2009)0557 , p.
ali izdelke, ki niso na voljo doma prek spleta Prav tam, str.
and of finding products not available domestically online Ibid, p.
, pri čemer se zdi številka 61 % zelo visoka in upravičuje nadaljnje preučevanje, preverjanje in oceno,
, whereas the figure of 61% seems to be very high and to warrant further study, verification and assessment,
ker postopno usklajevanje ne prispeva k učinkovitemu premagovanju ovir na notranjem trgu, ki izvirajo iz razlik v nacionalnih pogodbenih pravih, mora vsak ukrep na tem področju temeljiti na jasnih dokazih, da bi taka pobuda pomenila dejansko spremembo, ki je ni mogoče doseči drugače, z manj vsiljivimi sredstvi;
whereas gradual harmonisation does not effectively overcome obstacles in the internal market resulting from diverging national contract laws, any measures in this field must be based on clear evidence that such an initiative would make a real difference which cannot be achieved through other less intrusive means,
ker bi skupno evropsko pogodbeno pravo koristilo potrošnikom in zlasti prispevalo k večjemu obsegu čezmejne trgovine na notranjem trgu in njeni večji dostopnosti,
whereas a common European Contract Law would benefit consumers and in particular contribute to more and easily accessible cross-border trade within the internal market,
ker so pogajanja za direktivo o varstvu potrošnikov KOM(2008)0614 .
whereas the negotiations on the Consumer Rights Directive COM(2008)0614 .
pokazala na težave in omejitve usklajevanja na področju prava varstva potrošnikov, ki se uporablja za pogodbe, ne da bi pri tem ogrozili skupno zavezo k visoki ravni varstva potrošnikov v Evropi,
illustrated just how difficult it is to harmonise consumer law applied to contracts without undermining the common commitment to a high level of consumer protection in Europe and what limits this imposes on the process,
ker morajo vsi ukrepi, sprejeti na področju evropskega pogodbenega prava, upoštevati zavezujoče nacionalne predpise in morajo biti v skladu s pričakovanimi določbami direktive o pravicah potrošnikov, ki bo znatno vplivala na vsebino in raven usklajenosti morebitnega prihodnjega instrumenta na področju evropskega pogodbenega prava; ker bi bilo potrebno v naslednjih mesecih stalno in pazljivo spremljati njeno izvrševanje, da bi se opredelilo področje uporabe izbirnega instrumenta,
whereas any steps taken in the area of European contract law must take into account mandatory national rules, and must be coherent with the expected Consumer Rights Directive, which will have a significant impact on the content and on the level of harmonisation of a possible future instrument in the field of European Contract Law; whereas it would be necessary to constantly and carefully monitor its implementation in the next months in order to define which should be the scope of the optional instrument (OI),
ker mora biti končni produkt na področju evropskega pogodbenega prava, preden ga po potrebi spremenita in uradno sprejmeta evropska sozakonodajalca, realističen, izvedljiv, sorazmeren in dobro premišljen,
whereas any end product in the field of European Contract Law must be realistic, feasible, proportionate and properly thought through prior to being amended, if necessary, and formally adopted by the European co-legislators,
podpira ukrepe za obravnavanje številnih ovir, s katerimi se soočajo tisti, ki želijo opraviti čezmejne transakcije na notranjem trgu, in meni, da bi lahko bil projekt evropskega pogodbenega prava skupaj z drugimi ukrepi koristen za uresničitev celotnega potenciala notranjega trga, ki prinaša znatne gospodarske in zaposlitvene koristi;
Supports action to address the range of barriers faced by those who wish to enter into cross-border transactions in the Internal Market and considers that, along with other measures, the European Contract Law project could be useful for realising the full potential of the internal market, entailing substantial economic and employment benefits;
pozdravlja odprto razpravo o zeleni knjigi in si želi, da bi pristojne službe Komisije temeljito analizirale rezultate tega posvetovanja;
Welcomes the open debate on the Green Paper and urges the relevant Commission departments to carry out a thorough analysis of the outcome of this consultation process;
poudarja gospodarski pomen malih in srednjih podjetij ter obrtnikov v evropskem gospodarstvu; zato vztraja, da je treba uresničevati načelo „najprej misli na male“, ki ga promovira „akt za mala podjetja“, in ga obravnavati kot prednostno nalogo v okviru razprave o pobudah EU glede pogodbenega prava;
Highlights the economic importance of SMEs and craft manufacturing businesses in the European economy; insists, therefore, on the need to ensure that the ‘think small first’ principle promoted by the ‘Small Business Act’ is well implemented and considered as a priority in the debate over EU initiatives related to contract law;
pozdravlja nedavno objavo izsledkov študije o izvedljivosti, ki jo je opravila skupina strokovnjakov o evropskem pogodbenem pravu, ter zavezanost Komisije k nadaljnjemu posvetovanju o področju uporabe in vsebini izbirnega instrumenta in v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje resnično odprto in transparentno razpravo z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi kot del postopka odločanja o uporabi izsledkov študije o izvedljivosti;
Welcomes the recent publication of the results of the feasibility study carried out by the Expert Group on European contract law and the Commission's commitment to continue consultation on the scope and the content of the OI, and in this vein urges the Commission to continue a genuinely open and transparent discussion with all stakeholders as part of its decision-making process as to how the feasibility study should be used;
priznava, da je treba na področju pogodbenega prava nadalje napredovati, in med drugimi podpira 4. možnost vzpostavitve izbirnega instrumenta z uredbo po oceni učinka in razjasnitvi pravne podlage meni, da bi lahko izbirni instrument dopolnjevala zbirka orodij, ki bi jo lahko potrdili z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom; poziva k oblikovanju „standardnih evropskih vzorcev pogodb“, ki bodo prevedeni v vse jezike EU, povezani s sistemom alternativnega reševanja sporov ter ki se bodo izvajali prek spleta, kar bo stroškovno bolj učinkovita in preprostejša rešitev za obe pogodbeni strani, pa tudi za Komisijo;
Acknowledges the need for further progress in the area of contract law and favours, amongst other options, the option 4 of setting up an optional instrument (OI) by means of a regulation; after an impact assessment and clarification of the legal basis; believes that such an OI could be complemented by a ‘toolbox’ that could be endorsed by means of an interinstitutional agreement; calls for the creation of ‘European standard contract models’, translated into all EU languages, linked to an ADR system carried out online, which would have the advantage of being a cost-effective and simpler solution for both contractual parties and the Commission;
meni, da le uporaba pravne oblike uredbe lahko zagotovi potrebno jasnost in pravno varnost;
Believes that only by using the legal form of a Regulation can the necessary clarity and legal certainty be provided;
poudarja, da bi uredba, ki bi vzpostavila izbirni instrument evropskega pogodbenega prava, zaradi neposrednega učinka izboljšala delovanje notranjega trga, kar bi prineslo koristi podjetjem (znižanje stroškov kot posledica odpravljanja potrebe po kolizijskih pravilih), potrošnikom (pravna varnost, zaupanje, visoka stopnja varstva potrošnikov) in pravosodnim sistemom držav članic (saj ne bi bilo več potrebno proučevati tuje zakonodaje);
Stresses that a Regulation setting up an OI of European Contract Law would improve the functioning of the internal market because of the direct effect, with benefits for businesses (reduction in costs as a result of obviating the need for conflict-of-law rules), consumers (legal certainty, confidence, high level of consumer protection) and Member States' judicial systems (no longer necessary to examine foreign laws);
pozdravlja dejstvo, da izbrana možnost ustrezno upošteva načelo subsidiarnosti in ne posega v zakonodajno pristojnost držav članic na področju pogodbenega in civilnega prava;
Welcomes the fact that the chosen option takes appropriate account of the subsidiarity principle and is without prejudice to the legislative powers of the Member States in the area of contract and civil law;
meni, da bi lahko zbirko orodij uvajali v prakso postopoma, da bi začela kot orodje Komisije in bi jo potem, ko bi se institucije dogovorile, spremenili v orodje zakonodajalca Unije; poudarja, da bi zbirka orodij nudila potrebno pravno podlago in temelj za veljavo izbirnega instrumenta in standardnih pogojev ter bi morala temeljiti na oceni nacionalnih zavezujočih predpisov za varstvo potrošnikov znotraj obstoječega pravnega reda za varstvo potrošnikov, pa tudi zunaj njega;
Believes that a ‘toolbox’ could possibly be put into practice step-by-step, starting as a Commission tool, and being converted, once agreed between the institutions, into a tool for the Union legislator; points out that a ‘toolbox’ would provide the necessary legal backdrop and underpinning against which an OI and standard terms and conditions could operate and should be based on an assessment of the national mandatory rules of consumer protection within but also outside the existing consumer law acquis;
meni, da bi dopolnitev izbirnega instrumenta z zbirko orodij zagotovila jasnejše informacije o tem instrumentu EU, kar bi pogodbenim strankam pomagalo, da bi bolje razumele svoje pravice, in jim omogočilo ozaveščeno izbiro pri sklepanju pogodb na podlagi tega sistema, ter da bo pravni okvir tako bolj razumljiv in manj obremenjujoč;
Takes the view that by complementing an OI with a ‘toolbox’, clearer information will be available on that EU instrument, helping the parties concerned to better understand their rights and to make informed choices when entering into contracts on the basis of that system, and that the legal framework will be more comprehensible and not overburdensome;
meni, da bi se morale vse pogodbene strani tako v transakcijah med podjetji kot med podjetji in potrošniki prosto odločiti, ali bodo izbrale izbirni instrument kot alternativo nacionalni ali mednarodni zakonodaji (opt-in), zato poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, kakšen je načrtovano razmerje med izbirnim instrumentom ter Uredbo Rim I in mednarodnimi konvencijami, vključno s konvencijo Združenih narodov o mednarodni prodaji blaga; vendar meni, da je potrebna dodatna pozornost, da se zagotovi, da izbirni instrument nudi zaščito potrošnikom in malim podjetjem, saj so šibkejši trgovinski partnerji, ter v izogib vsem zmešnjavam pri izbiri prava; zato poziva Komisijo, naj izbirni instrument dopolni z dodatnimi informacijami, ki bodo v jasnem, natančnem in razumljivem jeziku razložile, katere pravice imajo potrošniki in da jim te ne bodo kratene, tako da bodo potrošniki izbirnemu instrumentu zaupali in da se bodo, ker bodo poznali svoje pravice, zmožni odločiti, ali bodo pogodbo sklenili na tej alternativni osnovi;
Believes that all parties, be it in B2B or B2C transactions, should be free to choose or not to choose the OI as an alternative to national or international law (opt-in) and therefore calls on the Commission to clarify the intended relationship of an OI with the Rome -I-Regulation and international conventions including the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG); considers however that further attention is required for ensuring that the OI offers protection to consumers and small businesses given their position as the weaker commercial partner and that any confusion is avoided when making a choice of law; therefore calls on the Commission to complement the OI with the additional information which will explain in a clear, precise and comprehensible language which are the consumer's rights and that they will not be compromised, in order to increase their confidence in the OI and to put them in a position to make an informed choice as to whether they wish to conclude a contract on this alternative basis;
meni, da bi lahko izbirni instrument ustvaril evropsko dodano vrednost, zlasti z zagotavljanjem pravne varnosti pod pristojnostjo Sodišča EU, hkrati pa bi bil možnost za premagovanje pravnih in jezikovnih zaprek, saj bi bil izbirni instrument seveda na voljo v vseh jezikih EU; poudarja, da bi za boljše razumevanje, na kakšen način delujejo evropske institucije, morali imeti evropski državljani na voljo vse informacije v zvezi z izbirnim instrumentom, ki bi jih bilo mogoče prevesti z dostopnimi in za uporabo enostavnimi spletnimi prevajalniki, tako da bi želeno informacijo lahko prebrali v lastnem jeziku;
Considers that an OI would generate European added value, in particular by ensuring legal certainty through the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice, providing at a stroke the potential to surmount both legal and linguistic barriers, as an OI would naturally be available in all EU languages; emphasises that, in order to create a better understanding of the way in which European institutions function, European citizens should have the opportunity to have all kinds of information connected with the optional instrument translated via accessible, easy-to-use online translation tools, so that they can read the desired information in their own language;
vidi možno praktično prednost prožnega in prostovoljnega instrumenta za sodelovanje („opt-in“); vendar poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni prednosti tega instrumenta za potrošnike in podjetja ter naj bolje pojasni, katera pogodbena stranka bo lahko izbirala med izbirnim instrumentom in zakonodajo, ki se „običajno“ uporablja, ter kako namerava Komisija zmanjšati poslovne stroške; poziva Komisijo, naj v vsak predlog za izbirni instrument vključi mehanizem za redno spremljanje in pregled ob tesnem sodelovanju vseh udeleženih strani, da se zagotovi skladnost izbirnega instrumenta s trenutno veljavnim pravnim redom na področju pogodbenega prava, zlasti z uredbo Rim I, s potrebami trga ter pravnim in gospodarskim razvojem;
Sees a possible practical advantage in the flexible and voluntary nature of an opt-in instrument; however calls on the Commission to clarify the advantages of such an instrument for both consumers and businesses and to better clarify which contracting party will have the choice between the OI and the ‘normally’ applicable law and how the Commission intends to reduce transaction costs; calls on the Commission to include in any proposal for an OI a mechanism for regular monitoring and review, with the close involvement of all parties concerned in order to ensure that the OI keeps up with the existing acquis in contract law, particularly Rome I, with market needs and with legal and economic developments;
meni, da bi lahko zajemal pogodbe med podjetji ter med podjetji in potrošniki; poudarja, da mora izbirni instrument zagotavljati zelo visoko raven varstva potrošnika, da se nadomesti varstvo, ki bi ga potrošniki uživali po svojem nacionalnem pravu; si želi dodatno razlago o tem, kako je to mogoče doseči; zato meni, da bi morala biti raven varstva potrošnikov višja od minimalnega varstva, ki ga zagotavlja pravni red o varstvu potrošnikov, in da bi morali biti zajeti zavezujoči nacionalni predpisi, hkrati pa je treba poiskati zadovoljive rešitve za težave s področja zasebnega mednarodnega prava; meni, da je visoka raven varstva potrošnikov tudi v interesu podjetij, saj bodo lahko uživala koristi izbirnega instrumenta le, če bodo potrošniki iz vseh držav članic zaupali, da z odločitvijo za izbirni instrument ne bodo izgubili varstva;
Believes that both business-to-business and business-to-consumer contracts should be covered; emphasises that the OI must offer a very high level of consumer protection, in order to compensate consumers for the protection that they would normally enjoy under their national law; wishes for further explanation on how this could be achieved; believes therefore the level of consumer protection should be higher than the minimum protection provided by the Consumer Acquis and cover national mandatory rules as satisfactory solutions must be found to problems of private international law; considers that this high level of consumer protection is also in the interests of businesses as they will only be able to reap the benefits of the OI if consumers of all Member States are confident that choosing the OI will not deprive them of protection;