natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da so v veliki meri mestna območja tista, na katerih se evropske politike dejansko izvajajo; poudarja, da se na mestnih območjih, kjer živi 73 % evropskega prebivalstva, ustvari okoli 80 % BDP in porabi do 70 % energije v EU, da so ta območja, tudi po zaslugi malih in srednjih podjetij, pomembna središča inovativnosti, znanja in kulture ter da zato občutno prispevajo h gospodarski rasti; poudarja, da lahko le mesta, ki zagotavljajo visokokakovostne storitve in ustrezno infrastrukturo, privabijo in spodbujajo dejavnosti, ki so usmerjene v prihodnost in imajo visoko dodano vrednost; po drugi strani ugotavlja, da nosijo tudi stroške gospodarske produktivnosti (širitev mestnih območij, gosta poseljenost, zastoji, onesnaževanje, raba zemljišč, podnebne spremembe, nezanesljiva preskrba z energijo, stanovanjska kriza, prostorska segregacija, kriminal, migracije itd.) ter so podvržena velikim socialnim neravnovesjem (visoka brezposelnost, pomanjkanje socialnega varstva, socialna polarizacija itd.), ki ogrožajo njihovo vlogo gonila rasti; poudarja, da na okoliška območja močno vplivajo ne le gospodarske, temveč tudi socialne in ekološke spremembe v mestnih območjih ter meni, da se mora mestna agenda zavzemati za razvoj trajnostnih, pametnih in vključujočih naložb, s čimer bi okrepili vlogo mest; zato meni, da je skupno zavzemanje za mestna območja v EU popolnoma utemeljeno, če želimo zmanjšati splošne učinke rasti in razvoja in se obenem lotiti problematike v zvezi z okoljsko trajnostjo in socialno kohezijo;
Highlights the fact that it is to a great extent urban areas that translate European policies into on-the-ground implementation; stresses that urban areas, which contain 73 % of Europe's population, generate around 80 % of the GDP and consume up to 70 % of the energy in the Union and are the major centres of innovation, knowledge and culture, thanks inter alia to the presence of SMEs, and therefore significantly contribute to economic growth; points out that only cities with high-quality services and adequate infrastructure can attract and promote forward-looking activities with high added value; notes that, on the other hand, they also bear the costs of economic productivity (urban sprawl, concentration, congestion, pollution, land use, climate change, energy insecurity, housing crisis, spatial segregation, crime, migration etc.) and are affected by major social imbalances (high unemployment, social insecurity and exclusion, social polarisation etc.) which put their role as ‘motors of growth’ at risk; stresses that not only economic, but also social and ecological, developments in urban areas have a great impact on the surrounding areas, and takes the view that the urban agenda must seek to develop sustainable, smart, inclusive investments so as to strengthen the role of cities; considers therefore that there is a clear justification for common engagement on the urban areas of the EU with a view to reducing the across-the-board effects of growth and development and, at the same time, tackling issues relating to environmental sustainability and social cohesion;
opozarja, da velja za mestni prevoz načelo subsidiarnosti; vendar poudarja, da bi sodelovanje, usklajevanje in evropsko financiranje lokalnim oblastem omogočilo soočanje z izzivi, zlasti v zvezi s prometom;
Points out that urban transport services are covered by the subsidiarity principle; emphasises, nevertheless, that European cooperation, coordination and funding would enable local authorities to meet the challenges they are facing, particularly in relation to transport;
meni, da povečanje prispevka mestnih območij k gospodarski rasti EU ob sočasnem ohranjanju ali izboljšanju njihovih značilnosti kot „krajev, ki omogočajo kakovostno življenje“, predstavlja skupni cilj evropskih, nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti; poudarja, da je ta cilj sicer skupen vsem ravnem oblasti, vendar se specifični ukrepi za njegovo doseganje razlikujejo glede na posamezen kraj; ugotavlja, da si bodo zaradi zgodovinskega razvoja v drugi polovici 20. stoletja nekatere regije in mesta morala prizadevati za doseganje širšega nabora prednostnih nalog, vključno s konvergenco, in meni, da je treba zagotoviti zadostno raven prožnosti, ki bo posameznim mestnim območjem omogočala iskanje rešitev, ki kar najbolje ustrezajo njihovim potrebam, makro- in mikrookolju ter razvojnemu okviru;
Believes that maximising the contribution of urban areas to the economic growth of the EU while sustaining or improving their parameters as ‘good places to live in’ is a shared goal of European, national, regional and local levels of government; stresses that while this goal is widely shared, the specific measures to pursue it can vary from place to place; notes that as a consequence of historical development in the second half of the twentieth century, some regions and cities will generally need to follow a wider palette of priorities including that of convergence, and hence considers that sufficient flexibility must be ensured, allowing particular urban areas to find the solutions best suited to their needs, macro- and micro-environment and development context;
priporoča, naj mestna razsežnost kohezijske politike sledi strateškemu konceptu za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast ter naj se osredotoči na trojni cilj: prvič, da se mestnim območjem pomaga pri razvoju osnovne fizične infrastrukture, kar je predpogoj za rast, da bi se v celoti izkoristil njihov potencial za prispevek h gospodarski rasti v Evropi in k diverzifikaciji gospodarske osnove ter k energetski in okoljski trajnosti, predvsem z namenom ohraniti in izboljšati kakovost zraka v mestnih središčih in brez negativnih vplivov na reke; drugič, da se mestnim območjem pomaga modernizirati gospodarske, socialne in okoljske značilnosti s pametnimi naložbami v infrastrukturo in storitve, ki bodo temeljile na tehnološkem napredku in bodo tesno povezane s posebnimi regionalnimi, lokalnimi in nacionalnimi zahtevami; in tretjič, da se mestna območja obnovijo s pomočjo sanacije industrijskih območij in onesnaženih zemljišč, pri čemer je treba upoštevati potrebo po vzpostavitvi povezav med mestnimi območji in podeželjem, da bi spodbudili vključujoč razvoj, ki izhaja iz strategije Evropa 2020;
Recommends that the urban dimension of Cohesion Policy, taking as a guideline the strategic concept of serving smart, sustainable, inclusive growth, should focus on a threefold objective: first, to help urban areas develop their basic physical infrastructure as a precondition for growth in order fully to exploit their potential contribution to economic growth in Europe, diversification of the economic base and energy and environmental sustainability, in particular with a view to maintaining and improving air quality in urban centres; without detriment to rivers; second, to help urban areas modernise their economic, social and environmental characteristics through smart investment in infrastructure and services based on technological advancements and closely related to specific regional, local and national requirements; thirdly, to regenerate urban areas by reclaiming industrial sites and contaminated land, while bearing in mind the need for links between urban and rural areas with a view to promoting inclusive development, in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy;
poudarja, da obstaja veliko možnosti za modernizacijo infrastrukturnih naložb s pametnimi tehnologijami, ki bi odpravljale trdovratne probleme na področju upravljanja mest, energetike, oskrbe z vodo in upravljanja njene porabe, prometa, turizma, stanovanjske politike, šolstva, zdravstvene in socialne oskrbe, javne varnosti itd. s pomočjo koncepta „pametnejši razvoj mest“; meni, da so take naložbe v infrastrukturo informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij nedvoumno gonilo gospodarske rasti in gospodarskih dejavnosti, ki temeljijo na inovacijah, ter da združujejo elemente javnih in zasebnih naložb, ki so lahko namenjene ustvarjanju novega podjetništva, trajnostnih delovnih mest in pametne rasti, kot izhaja iz ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 in zlasti iz partnerstva za inovacije „Pametna mesta“;
Points to the great potential for modernisation of infrastructure investment by means of intelligent technologies which would deal with persisting problems in city governance, energy, water supply and utilization management, transport, tourism, housing, education, health and social care, public safety, etc. through the concept of ‘smarter urban development’; believes that such information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure investment can be seen as an explicit driver of economic growth and innovation-based economic activity, bringing together the elements of public and private investment that can aim to generate new entrepreneurship, sustainable jobs and smart growth, in line with the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy and, in particular, the Smart Cities innovation partnership;
poudarja, da bo uporaba pametnih sistemov znatno prispevala k izboljšanju energetske učinkovitosti, varnosti in zaščite javnega sektorja, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v vsej Uniji zagotovijo usklajeno in učinkovito uvedbo teh sistemov, zlasti na mestnih območjih; poudarja, da lahko zlasti mesta pomembno prispevajo k boju proti podnebnim spremembam, na primer s pametnimi sistemi lokalnega javnega prevoza, energetsko prenovo stavb in trajnostnim načrtovanjem mestnih okrožij za zmanjšanje razdalj za prevoz na delo ali do drugih mestnih dobrin itd.; zato podpira pobudo CIVITAS in združenje županov; poudarja pomen uporabe razpoložljivih finančnih sredstev za izvajanje akcijskih programov, namenjenih spodbujanju izkoriščanja lokalnih obnovljivih virov energije, ter poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bosta v prihodnje obe pobudi posodabljani;
Stresses that the application of intelligent systems can make a significant contribution to improving energy efficiency, safety and security in the public sector, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure coordinated and effective deployment of intelligent systems in the Union as a whole, and particularly in urban areas; points out that cities, in particular, can make a major contribution towards combating climate change through, for instance, intelligent local public transport systems, energy refurbishment of buildings, and sustainable city-district planning which minimises distances to work, urban amenities etc.; in this context, supports the Civitas initiative and the Covenant of Mayors; stresses the importance of using available funding to implement programmes of action to promote the exploitation of local renewable energy potential, and calls on the Commission to ensure that both these initiatives are updated in the future;
poudarja pomembnost kohezijske politike za spodbujanje socialnih inovacij na mestnih območjih in zlasti v prikrajšanih soseskah, da bi spodbujali notranjo kohezijo in človeški kapital z vključujočim postopkom sodelovanja, najsibo na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja (zlasti za mladino), dostopa do mikrokreditov ali spodbujanja socialne ekonomije;
Stresses the relevance of cohesion policy to promoting social innovation in urban areas, particularly in disadvantaged neighbourhoods, with a view to enhancing internal cohesion and human capital by means of an inclusive and participatory approach, whether in terms of training and education (particularly for young people), access to micro-credits or promotion of the social economy;
ponovno poudarja svoje stališče, da je ena od pomanjkljivosti lizbonske strategije neobstoj pravilno delujočega upravljanja na več ravneh in nezadostno vključevanje regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti ter civilne družbe v zasnovo, izvajanje in ocenjevanje strategije ter obveščanje o njej; poudarja potrebo po izboljšanju sistema upravljanja strategije Evropa 2020 in večjem vključevanju deležnikov na vseh ravneh;
Reiterates its view that one of the weaknesses of the Lisbon Strategy was the lack of well-functioning multi-level governance and the insufficient involvement of regional and local authorities and civil society in the design, implementation, communication and evaluation stages of the strategy; stresses the need for an improved governance system for the EU2020 Strategy, with greater integration of stakeholders at all stages;
poziva Komisijo, naj v prihodnji zakonodaji zagotovi, da bodo države članice uradno vključile politične voditelje ključnih mestnih območij ter združenja lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti formalno vključijo v vse stopnje odločanja o kohezijski politiki (strateško načrtovanje, opredelitev predlaganih pogodb o razvojnem in naložbenem partnerstvu ter pogajanja o njih), na primer z oblikovanjem novih oblik partnerstva, kot so teritorialni pakti, oblikovani za vsako državo članico; poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja usposabljanje mestnih in lokalnih uprav, da bi jih seznanila s programi in pobudami mestne politike, ter v zvezi s tem poziva lokalne organe, naj pripravijo konkretne akcijske programe v okviru lastnih razvojnih strategij; meni, da je to edini način, s katerim se je mogoče odzvati na lokalne potrebe in hkrati preprečiti razdrobljenost strateških ciljev in rešitev;
Calls on the Commission to ensure in the upcoming regulations that Member States formally involve the political leaders of key urban areas and associations of local and regional authorities in all stages of Cohesion Policy decision-making (strategic planning, definition of, and negotiation on, the proposed ‘development and investment partnership contracts’), for example through the creation of new types of partnership such as Territorial Pacts devised for each Member State; calls on the Commission to promote the training of urban and local administrations with a view to providing information on urban policy programmes and initiatives, and calls on the local authorities accordingly to draw up concrete programmes of action under their specific development strategies; is of the opinion that this is the one and only way to reflect local needs while preventing fragmentation of strategic goals and solutions;
meni, da je treba okrepiti povezavo med lokalnimi akcijskimi načrti in glavnimi regionalnimi/nacionalnimi programi; podpira predlog Komisije za okrepitev vloge lokalnega pristopa k razvoju znotraj kohezijske politike s pomočjo podpornih skupin in akcijskih načrtov vrste „Leader“;
Believes that the link between local action plans and regional/national mainstream programmes should be strengthened; supports the Commission's proposal to reinforce the position of the local development approach in cohesion policy through ‘Leader’ type support groups and action plans;
poudarja, da mestna območja niso izolirani elementi znotraj regije ter da mora biti zato njihov razvoj tesno povezan z okoliškimi funkcionalnimi, predmestnimi ali podeželskimi območji; zahteva dodatna pojasnila za posebne primere, kot so tisti v velemestnih območjih, mestnih regijah in gosto poseljenih območjih, kjer so funkcije med seboj tesno povezane; meni, da so upravljanje na več ravneh, regionalno načrtovanje in načelo partnerstva najbolj učinkovita orodja za preprečevanje sektorske obravnave in razdrobljenosti razvojnih politik; vendar opozarja, da notranje sinergije niso vedno zagotovljene; poziva Komisijo, naj države članice posebej pozove, naj spodbujajo povezovanje in izmenjavo dobre prakse na področju strategij za povezavo podeželja in mestnih območij ter določijo mestne in podeželske razsežnosti v dokumentih načrtovanja, da bi zagotovile dobre povezave med mestnimi območji in podeželjem;
Stresses that urban areas are not isolated elements within their regions and that their development must therefore be closely linked to the surrounding functional, suburban or rural areas; seeks further clarification on specific situations such as those of metropolitan areas, urban regions and agglomerations, where functions are closely interlinked; considers that multi-level governance, regional planning and the partnership principle are the most effective tools to prevent sectorialisation and fragmentation of development policies; recalls, however, that internal synergies are not always guaranteed; urges the Commission to call on the Member States specifically to promote contacts and the exchange of good practices on rural-urban strategies and to set out urban-rural dimensions in planning documents to ensure good rural-urban links;
poudarja pozitivno vlogo, ki jo imajo čezmejno in nadnacionalno sodelovanje ter pobuda URBACT pri mrežnem povezovanju mest, izmenjavi najboljše prakse in oblikovanju inovativnih rešitev; ugotavlja, da je sodelovanje med evropskimi mesti povsem v skladu s 3. ciljem (evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje); meni, da je treba v obdobju 2014–2020 okrepiti mestno razsežnost cilja o evropskem teritorialnem sodelovanju; spodbuja vključevanje mest v mreže medregijskega in čezmejnega sodelovanja; meni, da je treba podprte mreže povezati z dejanskimi razvojnimi projekti, in poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi platforme, ki omogočajo eksperimentalni pristop k obnovi in razvoju mest; meni, da bi bilo lahko preskušanje koristno zlasti v okviru Evropskega socialnega sklada, v katerem bi lahko celostna teritorialna strategija dopolnila pristop po kategorijah prebivalstva;
Stresses the positive role that cross-border cooperation, transnational cooperation and URBACT initiative play in networking of cities, sharing best practice and generating innovative solutions; notes that cooperation between European cities is fully in line with Objective 3 (European territorial cooperation); considers that, during the period 2014- 2020, the urban dimension of the European territorial cooperation objective should be enhanced; encourages the involvement of cities in inter-regional and cross-border cooperation networks; believes that supported networks should be linked to real development projects and calls on the Commission to enhance the platforms to allow of an experimental approach to urban regeneration and development; believes that experimentation could be useful in the context of the ESF in particular, where an overall territorial strategy could complement an approach aimed at specific population groups;
poudarja, da bi procesa „obnove mest“ in „vključevanja mestne razsežnosti“ lahko privedla do novega „urbanega zavezništva“, ki bi združilo vse deležnike, vključene v proces „izgradnje mest“; to zavezništvo bi še naprej temeljilo na soglasju in bi se uradno vzpostavilo na podlagi novih oblik upravljanja, kjer imajo mreže socialnih akterjev in državljanov pomembno vlogo, njihov skupni cilj pa bi bil posodobiti, obnoviti in preoblikovati „obstoječe mesto“, pri čemer bi kar najbolje izkoristili človeške, socialne, materialne, kulturne in gospodarske vire, ki so se razvili v preteklih letih, in jih usmerili v izgradnjo mest, ki bi delovala na učinkovit, inovativen, pameten, bolj trajnosten in socialno povezan način;
Underlines that the process of ‘urban regeneration’ and ‘mainstreaming’ could lead to a new ‘urban alliance’ that brings together all stakeholders involved in the ‘city building’ process; the alliance would continue to be based on consensus and formally established with new forms of governance in which social and civic networks play an important part, the common objective being to upgrade, regenerate and reinvent the ‘existing city’, making optimal use of human, social, material, cultural and economic resources developed over the years and channelling them into the construction of cities run on efficient, innovative, intelligent, more sustainable and socially integrated lines;
znova poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi program izmenjav „Erasmus za lokalne in regionalne izvoljene predstavnike“, s katerim bi spodbudila prenos primerov dobre prakse pri strateškem lokalnem in urbanističnem razvoju;
Reiterates its call on the Commission to create an ‘Erasmus for local and regional elected representatives’ exchange programme in order to encourage the transfer of good practice in strategic local and urban development;
poudarja, da so lokalno izvoljene oblasti neposredno politično odgovorne za strateško odločanje in vlaganje javnih sredstev; v zvezi s tem meni, da jim morajo države članice zagotoviti zadostna proračunska sredstva; zato meni, da morajo biti za doseganje ciljev kohezijske politike in strategije Evropa 2020 lokalno izvoljene oblasti obvezno vključene v postopek sprejemanja strateških odločitev in tesno udeležene pri oblikovanju operativnih programov, možnosti nadaljnjega prenosa odgovornosti za izvajanje in ocenjevanje kohezijske politike pa je treba splošno uporabljati, seveda brez poseganja v finančno odgovornost organov upravljanja in držav članic; poudarja, da so lokalni organi v prvi vrsti odgovorni za blagostanje in kakovost življenja svojih državljanov, ki morajo biti skupaj z ostalimi deležniki vključeni v strategije lokalnega razvoja;
Stresses that local elected authorities have direct political accountability in terms of strategic decision-making and investing public resources; with that in mind, takes the view that the Member States should guarantee these authorities sufficient budgetary resources; considers, therefore, that in order to reach the goals of the Cohesion Policy and EU 2020 Strategy there must be obligatory involvement of local elected bodies in the strategic decision-making process, close involvement in drawing up operational programmes and broad use of the option of subdelegated responsibilities in the implementation and evaluation of the Cohesion Policy, without prejudice to the financial responsibility of the managing authorities and Member States; stresses that the priority of the local authorities is the welfare and quality of life of their citizens who, together with all stakeholders, must be involved in local development strategies;
priporoča eno od naslednjih možnosti za izvajanje mestne razsežnosti na nacionalni ravni v naslednjem programskem obdobju: neodvisni operativni programi, ki jih upravljajo posamezna mestna območja, skupni operativni programi, ki zajemajo mestna območja posameznih držav članic, globalna nepovratna sredstva ali dodelitev sredstev za mestne ukrepe in vire v okviru posebnih regionalnih operativnih programov; priznava, da je treba v prihodnje oblikovati posebne operativne programe za določena mestna območja, ki si prizadevajo za uresničitev svojega razvojnega potenciala;
Recommends that in the next programming period one of the following options be used in implementation of the urban dimension at national level: independent operational programmes managed by particular urban areas, joint operational programmes covering the urban areas of particular Member States, global grants or ring-fencing of urban measures and resources within specific regional operational programmes; recognises the importance of drawing up specific operational programmes in future for certain urban areas seeking to realise their development potential;
opozarja, da je treba glede na velike razlike v obsegu in stopnji urbanizacije znotraj EU, predvsem v regijah, ki so pretežno podeželske in kjer je le malo mestnih območij, delež virov, dodeljenih ukrepom za razvoj mest, tako kot v primeru splošne vsebine in prednostnih nalog operativnih programov, prepustiti presoji oblikovalcev programov, ki delujejo v imenu zadevne regije;
Cautions that, as the scale and predominance of urbanisation differs greatly across the EU, particularly where a region is predominantly rural and weakly urbanised, the share of resources attributed to urban actions, as with the general content and priorities of Operational Programmes, must be left to the discretion of programme designers operating on behalf of the region in question;