natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je tesnejše teritorialno sodelovanje odvisno od napredka pri evropskem povezovanju in usklajevanja na vseh področjih, ki prispevajo k evropski integraciji in teritorialni koheziji, in ker je tudi teritorialno sodelovanje poskusni laboratorij za evropsko povezovanje,
whereas closer territorial cooperation is dependent on progress made with European integration and coordination in all fields that contributes to European integration and territorial cohesion, and whereas territorial cooperation in itself is a testbed for European integration,
ker so naložbe v vseevropska prometna omrežja (TEN) v obmejnih regijah redka, čeprav je modernizacija nujno potrebna ravno na čezmejnih povezavah, ki bi lahko z odstranitvijo čezmejnih infrastrukturnih ovir postale klasičen primer evropske dodane vrednosti,
whereas only few investments take place in trans-European transport networks (TEN) in border regions, although it is precisely at the cross-border interfaces that modernisation is urgently required, and where it sees an instance of classic European added value in the removal of cross-border infrastructure barriers,
ker so splošni predpisi o strukturnih skladih in začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe bistveno povečali pomen teritorialnega sodelovanja,
whereas the basic regulation governing the Structural Funds and the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty have considerably increased the importance accorded to territorial cooperation,
ker je naknadno vrednotenje programov INTERREG III za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 jasno dokazalo dodano vrednost tega cilja za evropski projekt,
whereas the ex-post evaluation of the INTERREG III programmes for the 2000-2006 programming period offers conclusive proof of the added value of this objective for the European project,
opozarja, da je cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja spodbujanje sodelovanja med območji in regijami, da se jim omogoči skupno odzivanje na skupne izzive, zmanjšanje fizičnih, kulturnih, upravnih in zakonodajnih ovir, ki zavirajo sodelovanje, ter omilitev vpliva meja;
Points out that territorial cooperation aims to help territories and regions to work together in tackling their common challenges, to reduce the physical, cultural, administrative and regulatory barriers to such cooperation and to lessen the ‘border effect’;
verjame v evropsko dodano vrednost teritorialnega sodelovanja in njegovo vlogo pri krepitvi notranjega trga in evropskega povezovanja na področju številnih sektorskih politik ter zahteva, naj teritorialno sodelovanje ostane eden od stebrov kohezijske politike;
Is convinced of the European added value of territorial cooperation and the key role it plays in deepening the internal market and fostering closer European integration in several sectoral policies, and calls for territorial cooperation to remain one of the pillars of cohesion policy;
poudarja, da cilj teritorialnega sodelovanja, ki temelji na načelu gospodarske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije, zadeva vse regije EU, saj prispeva k spodbujanju usklajenega razvoja Unije kot celote;
Stresses that the objective of territorial cooperation, based on the principle of economic, social and territorial cohesion, concerns all the EU's regions in that it helps to promote the harmonious development of the Union as a whole;
meni, da se je teritorialno sodelovanje izkazalo kot učinkovito ter da je njegov potencial za spodbujanje konkurenčnosti premalo izkoriščen zaradi nizkih sredstev, ki so mu dodeljena; poziva, naj se v naslednjem programskem obdobju proračun za cilj „teritorialno sodelovanje“ poveča z 2,5 % v tekočem programskem obdobju na najmanj 7 % skupnega proračuna za kohezijsko politiko;
Believes that territorial cooperation has proved its effectiveness and that its potential as a source of competitiveness has so far been insufficiently tapped as a result of the inadequate resources allocated to it; calls for the budget for the ‘territorial cooperation’ objective to increase from 2,5% in the current programming period to at least 7% of the overall cohesion policy budget for the next programming period;
priporoča, naj se ohrani sedanja struktura cilja 3, razdeljenega na tri sklope, tj. čezmejnega (sklop A), nadnacionalnega (sklop B) in medregionalnega (sklop C), ter naj čezmejni sklop ohrani prevlado nad drugima dvema in naj mu bo dodeljeno najmanj 70 % proračuna za teritorialno sodelovanje; ugotavlja, da bi morala biti porazdelitev sredstev v okviru programa poštena in pravična za vse regije.
Advocates retaining the current structure of Objective 3, which is divided into three components (cross-border (component A), transnational (component B) and interregional (component C)), and the current emphasis on the cross-border component, which receives at least 70% of the territorial cooperation budget; notes that there should be a fair and equitable distribution of funds under the programme for all regions;
meni, da je treba v primeru nadaljnje ločitve med čezmejnim sklopom (sklop A), ki je vezan na lokalne potrebe življenja ob meji, in transnacionalnim sklopom (sklop B), vključno s t. i. makroregionalno razsežnostjo, ki omogoča sodelovanje na širših strateških osnovah, izboljšati usklajevanje med obema sklopoma;
Considers that, if a distinction should continue to be made between the cross-border component (component A), which meets the local needs of cross-border population catchment areas, and the transnational component (component B), including the so-called macroregional scale, which facilitates cooperation over wider strategic areas, better coordination between the two components is needed;
poleg tega glede na strateško naravo projektov spodbuja prožnejše izkoriščanje možnosti, ki jih daje člen 21 uredbe o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj glede lokacije dejavnosti v okviru čezmejnega in nadnacionalnega sodelovanja, ki vključujejo pomorske regije, da bi zagotovili skladnost in stalnost dejavnosti teritorialnega sodelovanja; zato poziva k izvajanju določene prožnosti pri uporabi omejitve na 150 km za obalne in obmorske regije v okviru čezmejnega sodelovanja;
Calls furthermore – with a view to ensuring the coherence and continuity of territorial cooperation measures and given the strategic nature of the projects in question – for greater flexibility in exploiting the scope offered by Article 21 of the ERDF Regulation with regard to the location of cross-border and transnational cooperation activities, incorporating maritime regions; to that end, calls for a certain flexibility in the application of the geographical limit of 150 km set for cross-border cooperation programmes for coastal and maritime regions;
kljub temu meni, da vključevanje tovrstnih regij in njihova odprtost proti geografskim območjem izven EU ni in ne sme biti zgolj vprašanje njihove geografske oddaljenosti, saj jim bogastvo zgodovinskih, jezikovnih in kulturnih vezi z različnimi deli sveta dodeljuje privilegiran položaj na področju poglabljanja tovrstnih odnosov, kar je v korist globalni prisotnosti EU;
Considers, nonetheless, that the integration of such regions with and their opening up to geographical areas outside the EU is not and cannot be simply a function of their geographical remoteness, as the wealth of historical, linguistic and cultural bonds linking them to various parts of the world gives them a key role to play in the deepening of such relations, to the benefit of the EU's global presence;
poudarja ključno vlogo teritorialnega sodelovanja pri doseganju ciljev strategije Evropa 2020; poziva k predhodnemu razmisleku za določitev strateških potreb vseh mejnih regij in območij sodelovanja v povezavi s strategijo Evropa 2020 ter k vključitvi in prilagoditvi evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja na vse ravni strateškega načrtovanja (evropsko, nacionalno, regionalno in lokalno); vztraja, naj Komisija čim prej pojasni vsebino svojih predlogov glede tematske koncentracije sredstev v povezavi s „tematskim menijem“ Evropa 2020;
Underlines the crucial role of territorial cooperation in delivering the EU2020 objectives; calls for forward thinking to ascertain the strategic needs of each border region and area of cooperation in connection with this strategy, and, subsequently, for European territorial cooperation to be integrated in, and tailored to, all levels of strategic planning: European, national, regional and local; urges the Commission to clarify, without delay, its proposals on the thematic concentration of funds, with reference to an EU 2020 ‘thematic menu’;
poziva, naj se sredstva za vsak posamezen program teritorialnega sodelovanja dodeljujejo na podlagi usklajenih meril, da bi zagotovili strateški in celovit odziv na potrebe in posebnosti vsakega ozemlja in območja sodelovanja; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o drugih ustreznih, strateških in merljivih merilih, ki bi lahko odražala potrebe ozemlja, ne da bi zmanjšali težo najpomembnejšega, tj. demografskega merila;
Calls for funds to be allocated for each programme of territorial cooperation on the basis of harmonised criteria so as to provide a strategic, integrated response to the needs and specificities of each territory or area involved; invites in this respect the Commission and the Member States to consider other relevant, strategic and measurable criteria that could reflect the needs of territories without undermining the most important criterion: demography;
ponovno poudarja pomen medregionalnega sodelovanja (sklop C), obžaluje pa pomanjkanje sredstev, ki so mu namenjena; zato predlaga ponovni razmislek o omejitvi stopnje sofinanciranja EU v tem sklopu, tudi ob upoštevanju njegove zmožnosti, da deluje kot spodbuda, za sodelujoče iz regij, katerih cilj je konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje, da bi povišali število projektov v sklopu C; poziva k razširitvi tematskih področij sodelovanja, da bodo zajemala upravljanje in vodenje operativnih programov ter teritorialni razvoj;
Stresses once again the importance of interregional cooperation (component C), but deplores the lack of funds allocated to it; suggests, therefore, a reconsideration of the EU cofinancing rate limit of this component, devoting attention also to its capacity to act as an incentive, for participants from the regions covered by the ‘competitiveness and employment’ objective in order to raise the number of projects in this component C, and calls for the thematic areas of cooperation to be widened to encompass governance and management of operational programmes as well as territorial development;
spodbuja tudi regije, naj bolje izkoristijo možnosti za medregionalno sodelovanje, ki jih v okviru njihovih operativnih programov ponuja splošna uredba Člen 37(6)(b).
Encourages also regions to make better use of the scope for interregional cooperation offered within their operational programmes by the basic regulation Article 37(6)(b).
; priporoča, naj medregionalni sklop cilja 3 pokriva tudi usklajevanje in izvajanje teh projektov, ovrednotenje znanja in izmenjavo dobrih praks;
; advocates, therefore, that the ‘interregional’ component of Objective 3 should also cover the coordination and running of such projects, the pooling of know-how and the exchange of good practices;
v zvezi s prihodnjimi operativnimi programi za teritorialno sodelovanje poudarja pomen podpore s strani programa INTERACT in zmogljivosti za uspešne sheme pomoči, ki bi se lahko zgledovale po projektu RC LACE; poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju programa INTERACT s programoma URBACT in ESPON ter sklopom C, da bi dosegli boljše izvajanje cilja 3;
Stresses, for the future territorial cooperation operational programmes, the importance of the support of INTERACT and the capacity for successful assistance schemes, which could draw inspiration from the RC LACE project; calls for more effective coordination between INTERACT, URBACT, ESPON and component C, with a view to better implementing Objective 3;
spodbuja dejavnosti ESPON, vendar meni, da bi morale biti možnosti za dejavno sodelovanje v njegovih raziskavah glede teritorialnega razvoja bolj dostopne lokalnim in regionalnim organom, pri tem pa zagotovljena enostavnejša praktična uporaba dobljenih rezultatov;
Supports ESPON in its activities but suggests that opportunities for active involvement in its research into territorial development matters should be made more accessible to local and regional authorities while easier practical deployment of the resulting findings should be assured;
se veseli uspeha programa URBACT na področju trajnostnega urbanega razvoja in poziva k njegovemu podaljšanju ter razširitvi v pomembno in široko dostopno pobudo, ki bi zagotavljala možnosti za skupno učenje in prenosljivost v zvezi z lokalnimi urbanimi izzivi;
Welcomes the success of the URBACT sustainable urban development programme and calls for its renewal and expansion into a significant and widely accessible initiative to offer opportunities for shared learning and transferability with regard to local urban challenges;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj razmisli o možnostih za vključevanje lokalnih in regionalnih politikov v ta evropska omrežja izmenjave izkušenj in dobrih praks, kar bi bil prvi korak k izvajanju projekta Erasmus za predstavnike, izvoljene na lokalnih in regionalnih volitvah;
Invites the Commission to look into ways of involving local and regional councillors in these Europe-wide networks for the exchange of experiences and good practices, as a first step to implement the Erasmus project for local and regional elected representatives;
znova poudarja, da je vključevanje poddržavnih akterjev v doseganje ciljev EU predpogoj za učinkovito izvajanje teritorialne kohezije;
Reiterates that involving sub-national actors in the achievement of the EU objectives is a precondition to effectively implement territorial cohesion;
spodbuja države članice in regije, naj oblikujejo večregionalne operativne programe, prilagojene skupnim ozemeljskim problematikam, kot je skupno gorovje ali povodje, ki ozemlju dajejo skupen značaj;
Encourages the Member States and regions to set up multi-regional operational programmes to address common territorial problems; such as the presence of a mountain range or a river basin which characterises the territory;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo usklajevanje politik v čezmejnih regijah in na trgu dela, da bi preprečili težave z izkrivljanjem konkurence, do katerih prihaja v okviru gospodarskega in teritorialnega povezovanja;
Encourages the Commission and Member States to promote the coordination of policies in cross-border regions and the labour market, so as to ensure that issues of distortion of competition do not arise within the framework of economic and territorial integration;
meni, da so programi čezmejnega sodelovanja prav tako pomembni, če želimo biti učinkoviti in doseči rezultate na področju strategij, ki zadevajo zmanjšanje revščine in vključevanje prikrajšanih skupin v evropsko družbo; poziva, naj bo ta problematika upoštevana pri snovanju regulativnega okvira in naj se zagotovi, da bodo v prikrajšanih regijah na voljo primerni ukrepi za udeležbo v evropskih regionalnih razvojnih programih;
Considers that cross-border cooperation programmes are also important in order to be effective and achieve results with regard to strategies that concern poverty reduction and integration of disadvantaged groups into European mainstream society; calls for this issue to be considered when designing the regulatory framework and for it to be ensured that in disadvantaged regions appropriate measures are available for participation in European regional development programmes;
Sprejeti teritorialni pristop za druge politike Skupnosti
Adopting a territorial approach in implementing other EU policies
ugotavlja, da pristopi po vzoru strategije za Baltsko morje lahko deloma povečajo čezmejno sodelovanje; meni, da bi morale makrostrategije v celoti upoštevati druge programe regionalnega sodelovanja z namenom ustvarjanja sinergij; opozarja, da je koncept makroregij (na pobudo Sveta) zaenkrat še eksperimentalen in logičen način usklajevanja skupnih projektov, ki zadevajo veliko ozemlje, ki ga zaznamuje skupna teritorialna problematika, njegov cilj pa je izkoriščanje prednosti celostnega, večsektorskega in teritorialnega pristopa na podlagi skupnih strateških dejavnosti z uporabo že obstoječih sredstev;
Notes that approaches along the lines of the Baltic Sea Strategy can enhance cross-border cooperation; considers that macro-strategies should take full account of other regional cooperation programmes in order to generate synergies; points out that the concept of macro-regions, a Council initiative, came into being as an experimental, logical way of coordinating common projects covering a very large territory, characterised by common territorial problems, with a view to making use of the advantages of an integrated, multisectoral and territorial approach based on common strategic actions receiving support from existing funds;
opozarja, da bi morale tovrstne strategije, kakršne so ali bi lahko bile v prihodnosti, zagotoviti podlago za bolj strateške in skupne pristope, ki bi se jih uresničevalo prek ustreznih instrumentov teritorialnega sodelovanja, ki pa ne ustvarjajo dodatnih sredstev v proračunu EU, niti ne zagotavljajo ustanavljanja novih institucij, pa tudi ne uporabe nove zakonodaje;
Points out that such strategies as exist or may exist in the future should provide a basis for more strategic and ‘joined up’ approaches to be realised via the relevant territorial cooperation instruments but are not generating new funds in the EU budget, and do not provide for the establishment of new institutions or the application of new legislation;
zahteva, naj Komisija natančno preuči rezultate izvajanja prvih makroregionalnih strategij; meni, da je postopek vzbudil interes, ki ga je treba izkoristiti in pridobljene izkušnje uporabiti pri izvajanju novih makroregionalnih strategij;
Asks the Commission to conduct an in-depth study of the results of the first macro-regional strategies implemented; believes that the process has met with a level of interest that should be built on, with lessons being learnt for the implementation of future new macro-regional strategies;
poudarja, da cilj „teritorialno sodelovanje“ lahko zagotovi sodelovanje na makroregionalni ravni, zlasti v okviru svojega nadnacionalnega sklopa;
Points out that the Territorial Cooperation Objective can accommodate cooperation on a macroregional scale, especially within its transnational strand;
se zavzema za uporabo nadnacionalnih programov v podporo tem teritorialnim strategijam preko usklajenih prizadevanj pri snovanju, oblikovanju in upravljanju makroregionalnih strategij, ne da bi to vodilo v nepotrebno podvajanje proračunskih struktur EU z ustvarjanjem specifičnih proračunskih postavk za različne makroregije;
Advocates the use of transnational programmes to support these territorial strategies by coordinating the work of devising, framing and steering macro-regional strategies, albeit without this leading to unnecessary duplication of the EU's budget structures by creating specific budget lines for different macro-regions;
hkrati poudarja, da cilji makroregionalnih strategij dopolnjujejo cilje mikroregionalnega čezmejnega sodelovanja in jih lahko zaobjemajo, ne morejo pa jih nadomestiti; zato poudarja, da je treba čezmejno komponento teritorialnega sodelovanja ohraniti kot ločen in zakonit element;
Stresses at the same time that the aims of macro-regional strategies complement the aims of micro-regional cross-border cooperation and may encompass them, but cannot replace them; stresses for this reason that the cross-border component of territorial cooperation must be preserved as a distinct and legitimate element in its own right;
je prepričan, da lahko nadnacionalni sklop cilja 3 prispeva k intenzivnejšemu sodelovanju v okviru makroregionalnih strategij z večjim sodelovanjem regionalnih in lokalnih organov ter civilne družbe pri izvajanju konkretnih dejavnosti;
Is convinced that the transnational component of Objective 3 can help to improve cooperation in the context of macro-regional strategies by involving regional and local authorities and civil society more closely in the implementation of practical initiatives;
meni, da mora vsaka nadnacionalna strategija v svoja stališča vključiti možnost usklajevanja s smernicami vseevropskih prometnih omrežij ter s strategijami v okviru celostne pomorske politike;
Believes that any transnational strategy must take due account of the scope of coordination with the trans-European transport network guidelines and the strategies pursued under the integrated maritime policy;
opozarja, da teritorialno sodelovanje zadeva notranje in zunanje meje Evropske unije ter zajema vprašanja, povezana s sedanjimi in prihodnjimi makroregionalnimi strategijami; poudarja težave pri sofinanciranju, s katerimi se soočajo tretje države pri izvajanju določb o sodelovanju iz uredbe o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj; poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli, kako doseči boljšo sinergijo med pobudami v okviru Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj, instrumenta predpristopne pomoči, evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta in Evropskega razvojnega sklada, ter jo poziva k čimprejšnji predložitvi predloga nove sosedske politike; poziva k poenostavitvi in uskladitvi pravil, ki urejajo dostop do različnih virov financiranja, da bi zagotovili skladnost in olajšali njihovo uporabo za upravičence;
Points out that territorial cooperation concerns both the EU's internal and external borders, including matters relating to current and future macro-regional strategies; stresses the difficulties encountered by third countries in obtaining cofinancing under the arrangements for cooperation provided for in the ERDF Regulation; asks the Commission to consider how to create more effective synergies between initiatives under the ERDF, the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) and the European Development Fund (EDF), and calls on it to submit a proposal for a new Neighbourhood Policy as soon as possible; calls for a simplification and harmonisation of the rules governing access to the different sources of financing, in order to ensure compatibility and facilitate their use by beneficiaries;
z ozirom na posebni značaj evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta poziva Komisijo, naj prenese odgovornost za njegovo upravljanje na svoj GD za regionalni razvoj, ob tem pa upošteva zunanjepolitične vidike; ugotavlja, da evropski sosedski in partnerski instrument v sedanji obliki ne zagotavlja ustrezne podlage za upoštevanje posebnih značilnosti čezmejnega sodelovanja; meni, da bi bilo treba razmisliti o ločitvi tega instrumenta od upravljanja zunanjih odnosov, vsaj v tistih primerih, v katerih tretje države, ki so udeležene v čezmejnem sodelovanju, tudi financirajo sodelovanje;
Calls on the Commission, in view of the special nature of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument, to transfer responsibility for managing it to the Commission's DG Regional Development, albeit taking into account external relations aspects; notes that, in its present form, ENPI does not provide an adequate basis for taking account of the specific features of cross-border cooperation; believes that consideration should be given to separating it from the administration of external relations at least in those cases in which third countries participating in external border cooperation also fund the cooperation;
poziva k izvajanju Akcijskega načrta za širše sosedstvo za najbolj oddaljene regije EU, kot je napovedala Komisije v svojem sporočilu KOM(2004)0343 ; poudarja, da je v tem smislu potrebno skladno večsektorsko delovanje v politikah Unije, ki zadevajo najbolj oddaljene regije, zlasti boljše usklajevanje med zunanjim in notranjim sklopom, in sicer s sprejetjem območne strategije;
Calls for implementation of the Wider Neighbourhood Action Plan for the EU's outermost regions, announced in Commission Communication COM(2004) 343; stresses, therefore, the need for coherent multisectoral action in areas of EU policy concerning the outermost regions and, in particular, for internal and external components to be coordinated more effectively by means of a catchment area strategy;