natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
predlaga, naj prihodnji zakonodajni predlog Komisije o uporabi alternativnega reševanja sporov za potrošnike v Evropski uniji vključuje naslednje smernice, ki jih je treba upoštevati v povezavi s sistemi alternativnega reševanja sporov, vzpostavljenimi v Evropi:
Suggests that the Commission's future legislative proposal on the use of ADR for consumers in the EU incorporate the guidelines to be followed in relation to ADR systems established in Europe, these being the following:
neodvisnost, nepristranskost in zaupnost
independence, impartiality and confidentiality
: pri imenovanju mediatorjev je treba preprečiti možnost pojava navzkrižja interesov; uspešen temelj za zagotavljanje nepristranskih odločitev je načelo sodelovanja oseb iz združenj potrošnikov in predstavniških organizacij podjetij;
: when mediators are being designated, the possibility of conflicts of interest arising should be avoided; the principle of joint participation by members of consumer associations and organisations representing companies could serve as a useful basis for ensuring the impartiality of the outcome;
: pristojni strokovnjaki morajo imeti strokovne sposobnosti, izobrazbo in izkušnje za opravljanje funkcije in morajo biti nepristranski, neodvisni in kompetentni;
: the professionals in charge must have the specialist ability, training and experience to perform their role and must be impartial, independent and competent;
učinkovitost in hitrost
efficiency and speed
: mediatorji morajo imeti na voljo zadostna sredstva (ustrezne človeške, materialne in finančne vire) in biti sposobni upoštevati kratek rok med začetkom postopka in sprejetjem odločitve;
: mediators must have adequate means at their disposal (appropriate human, material and financial resources) and be able meet the short deadlines between referral and decision;
potrošnikov in strokovnjakov glede informacij, pa tudi konceptualno in postopkovno, ter dvostranske izmenjave, kar pomeni, da lahko obe strani izrazita svoje stališče ter se seznanita s stališčem druge strani in dejstvi, ki jih ta predstavi;
between consumers and professionals, in terms of information as well as conceptually and procedurally, and two-way exchanges, i.e. the two parties being able to express their position and to familiarise themselves with the position and the facts stated by the other;
: vprašanje stroškov alternativnega reševanja sporov je treba rešiti, da se zagotovi privlačnost takega načina za stranke; ob tem bi moral biti sistem brezplačen za stranko, ki v zadevi zmaga, ali pa bi moral za potrošniku predstavljati zelo zmeren strošek;
: the issue of the cost of ADR should be resolved in order to ensure that such an option is attractive to the parties concerned; with this in mind, the system should be free, if a case is won, or offered at a very moderate cost to the consumer;
svoboda izbire
freedom of choice
zunajsodni značaj postopka
out-of-court nature
: alternativno reševanje sporov mora biti izbirno in temeljiti na spoštovanju svobodne izbire strank v celotnem postopku, tako da imajo vedno možnost, da spor rešijo pred sodiščem; istočasno je treba zagotoviti, da si stranki resnično prizadevata za uspešno mediacijo; alternativno reševanje sporov nikakor ne sme biti prva obvezna faza pred začetkom sodnega postopka, odločitve, sprejete v okviru takega reševanja, pa so lahko zavezujoče le, če so bile stranke o tem predhodno obveščene in so to izrecno sprejele; kljub taki odločitvi, morata stranki še vedno imeti možnost, da se odločita za sodno obravnavo;
: ADR must be optional and based on respect for the parties' freedom of choice throughout the process, allowing them the possibility of choosing, at any time, to settle their dispute before the courts; at the same time, guarantees must be provided that genuine efforts are being made to achieve successful mediation; it must not under any circumstances constitute an initial compulsory step prior to the initiation of legal proceedings, and the decision stemming from it can be binding only if the parties have been informed to that effect beforehand and expressly agree to it; despite such a decision, it must still be possible for the parties to opt for a court hearing;
postopkov, sklepov in stroškov, da se prepreči, da bi njihov učinek presegel predmet in težo spora; nastali stroški morajo biti prilagojeni povzročeni škodi;
of the procedures, decisions and costs, to avoid their impact exceeding the objective and content of the dispute; the costs borne must be in proportion to the damage incurred;
: poleg zagotavljanja splošnih informacij (vrsta pravnega spora, pravila za začetek postopka, podrobna pravila za sprejemanje odločitev itd.) mora vsaka oseba, ki deluje kot mediator, obvezno objaviti letno poročilo;
: besides providing general information (types of lawsuit, rules on referral, decision-taking arrangements, etc.), any person acting as a mediator must be obliged to publish an annual report;
poziva Komisijo, naj za čezmejne potrošniške spore predvidi koordinacijski organ, ki bo olajšal dostop do nacionalnih sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov in sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov, ki jih vodijo podjetja, ter njihovo usklajevanje;
Calls on the Commission to make provision for coordination in respect of transnational consumer disputes in order to facilitate access to, and the coordination of, national and business-led ADR systems;
poziva Komisijo, naj za čezmejne potrošniške spore na področju elektronskega trgovanja predvidi hitro vzpostavitev večjezične platforme, ki bo potrošnikom omogočala, da bodo spore v celoti rešili na spletu, morala pa bo izpolnjevati standarde kakovosti in temeljiti na sistemih alternativnega reševanja sporov, ki obstajajo v državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission, in the context of cross-border e-commerce consumer disputes, to make arrangements for the rapid introduction of a multilingual platform enabling consumers to resolve their disputes entirely on line, bearing in mind that this platform must meet quality standards and be based on existing ADR systems in the Member States;
meni, da je obveščanje potrošnikov odgovornost, ki si jo delijo javni organi, mreže za obveščanje in svetovanje, regulativni organi in združenja potrošnikov, ter jim priporoča, naj vsak na svoji ravni izvede kampanje ozaveščanja in pilotne projekte o tej temi;
Takes the view that the provision of information to consumers is a responsibility shared by public authorities, information and advisory networks, regulators and consumer groups, and recommends that they each, at their respective level, conduct awareness-raising campaigns and pilot projects on the subject;
graja nepreglednost trenutne zbirke podatkov Komisije o alternativnem reševanju sporov; Komisiji predlaga, naj oblikuje večjezični evropski internetni portal o alternativnem reševanju sporov, na katerem bodo lahko vsi državljani dobili informacije o delovanju alternativnega reševanja sporov, njegovih posledicah ter svojih pravicah in dolžnostih, pri tem pa naj izhaja iz obstoječih podatkovnih zbirk in mrež; poudarja, da je treba v interesu potrošnikov zagotoviti, da bo spletni portal zlahka razumljiv in jasen;
Criticises the confusing nature of the Commission's current ADR database; suggests that the Commission create a multilingual European internet ADR portal, where any consumer may access information on how ADR works, what it involves and about their rights and obligations, building on existing databases and networks; emphasises that, in the interests of consumers, emphasis must be placed on the user-friendliness and clarity of the on-line portal;
poudarja, da morajo imeti potrošniki možnost pridobiti na spletu vse potrebne informacije o alternativnem reševanju sporov, ustrezno prevedene v njihov jezik z uporabo vedno dostopnih, do uporabnika prijaznih spletnih strojnih prevajalnikov;
Emphasises that consumers must be able to obtain all relevant on-line information about ADR, properly translated into their own languages, by using readily accessible, user-friendly on-line translation machines;
poudarja, da je bistveno ozaveščati potrošnika o obstoju in koristih alternativnega reševanja sporov, preden nastane potrošniški spor; vztraja, da je treba s tem v zvezi okrepiti občutek odgovornosti podjetij in poslovnih organizacij; meni, da so podjetja in poslovna združenja dolžna obvestiti potrošnike o razpoložljivih mehanizmih za alternativno reševanje sporov; predlaga, naj se ta predhodna informacija zagotovi z navedbo možnosti uporabe alternativnega reševanja sporov v vseh pogodbenih dokumentih in naj se za poklicne delavce, ki jo uporabljajo, dopolni s kontaktnimi podatki in podrobnimi pravili za uporabo teh sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov; ta zahteva pa ne sme povzročati dodatnih stroškov in birokracije;
Emphasises that it is crucial to raise consumer awareness of the existence and benefits of ADR prior to the initiation of a consumer dispute; insists on the necessity to reinforce the sense of responsibility of businesses and business organisations in this regard; considers that businesses and businesses federations have a duty to inform consumers on available ADR mechanisms; proposes that this ‘upstream’ information should include a reference in all contractual documents drawn up by professionals to the possibility of recourse to ADR, along with contact details and referral procedures for the relevant ADR systems; however, this requirement should avoid extra costs and bureaucracy;
kot mogočo spodbudo za podjetja priporoča, naj se na evropski ravni uvede znak kakovosti, povezan z mediacijo v potrošniških sporih, za katero bi se sprejele smernice o najboljših praksah, tako da bi lahko potrošniki hitro določili podjetja, ki so se odločila za sisteme alternativnega reševanja sporov. meni, da bi bilo treba v zvezi s tem predlogom izvesti analizo stroškov in koristi; poudarja, da bi morala Komisija zagotoviti, da se znak pravilno uporablja in uveljavlja;
Recommends, as a potential incentive for enterprises, that a quality label for mediation be introduced in relation to mediation in consumer disputes, which would be associated with guidelines recognising best practices, so that consumers can rapidly identify businesses that have opted into ADR systems; takes the view that a cost-benefit analysis should be carried out first on this proposal; stresses that the Commission should ensure that the label is properly used and enforced;
ugotavlja, da je potrebno boljše splošno obveščanje o pravicah in njihovem uveljavljanju, pa tudi posebno obveščanje o shemah alternativnega reševanja sporov, tudi o njihovem obstoju, delovanju in lokaciji; meni, da bi morali informacijski programi izpostaviti tudi glavne prednosti izbire alternativnega reševanja sporov, na primer stroške v primerjavi s sodnim postopkom, stopnje uspešnosti in časovno učinkovitost v primerjavi s sodnim postopkom; meni, da bi morali biti taki programi namenjeni predvsem državljanom ter malim in srednjim podjetjem; meni, da je alternativno reševanje sporov najučinkovitejše, če deluje v omrežjih blizu državljanov in temelji na sodelovanju z državami članicami;
Notes that there needs to be an improvement in general information about rights and their enforcement and specific information on ADR schemes, including their existence, functioning and location; takes the view that information programmes should also point to the main advantages of choosing ADR, such as the cost in comparison to litigation, success rates and time efficiency in comparison to litigation; takes the view that such programmes should be targeted in particular at citizens and SMEs; believes that ADR is most effectively provided in a network close to citizens and on the basis of joint work with Member States;
sočasno poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma sprejme ukrepe za ozaveščanje potrošnikov in podjetij o obstoječih zakonodajnih instrumentih, kot so Uredba (ES) št. 861/2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, Direktiva 2008/52/ES o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah in Uredba (ES) št. 805/2004 o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov; s tem namenom predlaga, naj se v obsežne informacijske kampanje vključijo nacionalni organi, sodišča, odvetniške in gospodarske zbornice, uradi za svetovanje potrošnikom, zavarovatelji stroškov postopka ter druge pristojne organizacije; poziva, naj se zagotovi finančna podpora za tovrstne kampanje na evropski in nacionalni ravni;
Calls on the Commission, at the same time, to take immediate steps to ensure that consumers and businesses are made more aware of existing legislative instruments, such as Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure, Directive 2008/52/EC on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters and Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims; with that aim in view, proposes that national authorities, courts, bar associations and chambers of commerce, consumer advice bureaux, legal expenses insurers and other competent organisations should be involved in a comprehensive information campaign; calls for financial support to be provided for European and national campaigns of this kind;
ugotavlja, da ostaja uporaba sodišč za spore majhne vrednosti v številnih državah članicah zelo nizka in da je treba narediti več na področju pravne varnosti, jezikovnih ovir in preglednosti postopkov; poziva Komisijo, naj pri oblikovanju zakonodajnega predloga o uporabi alternativnega reševanja sporov v potrošniških zadevah v EU tem pravnim organom nameni posebno pozornost;
Notes that the usage of small claims tribunals in some Member States remains significantly low and that more needs to be done in terms of legal certainty, language barriers and transparency of proceedings; calls on the Commission to devote particular attention to these legal bodies when formulating its legislative proposal on the use of ADR for consumer matters in the EU;
ugotavlja, da je zaradi spravne narave alternativnega reševanja sporov rešitev mogoče razumeti kot obojestransko zadovoljiv rezultat, in opozarja na dejstvo, da je spoštovanje odločitev, doseženih v okviru alternativnega reševanja sporov, na splošno visoko; zato meni, da bi morali biti najnovejši statistični podatki o tem objavljeni skupaj z javnimi informacijami o alternativnem reševanju sporov;
Notes that the conciliatory nature of ADR means that the resolution is more likely to be considered a ‘win-win’ result and points to the fact that compliance with resolutions reached via ADR is generally high; believes, therefore, that up-to-date statistics regarding this should be published alongside public information on ADR;
poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami izvede informacijske kampanje, usmerjene v izobraževanje in ozaveščanje potrošnikov in podjetij o prednostih uporabe tega instituta;
Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to undertake information campaigns aimed at educating, and raising the awareness of, both consumers and businesses with regard to the benefits of using this institution;
meni, da bi bilo treba informacijske kampanje o alternativnem reševanju sporov voditi v sodelovanju z gospodarskimi zbornicami, združenji potrošnikov in uradi pravične trgovine (ali enakovrednimi ustanovami), da bi zagotovili usklajene in učinkovite kampanje;
Considers that ADR information campaigns should be run in cooperation with chambers of commerce, consumer groups and offices of fair trading (or equivalent) in order to ensure a well coordinated and effective campaign;
meni, da je obveščanje podjetij odgovornost, ki si jo delijo javni organi in predstavniške organizacije, ter jim priporoča, naj vsak na svoji ravni izvede kampanje osveščanja in pilotne projekte o tej temi;
Takes the view that the provision of information to businesses is a responsibility shared by public authorities and representative organisations, and recommends that they each, at their respective level, conduct awareness-raising campaigns and pilot projects on the subject;
priznava, da je ena glavnih ovir pri uporabi sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov nepripravljenost podjetij, da bi sodelovala v teh mehanizmih; predlaga, da morajo gospodarske zbornice in krovne organizacije na nacionalni in EU ravni in druge strokovne organizacije obveščati podjetja o obstoju alternativnega reševanja sporov in morebitni koristi njegove uporabe, zlasti z vidika: vnaprejšnjega preprečevanja sodnih sporov pri, ugleda podjetja; nazadnje pa tudi o možnosti, da tako reševanje v nasprotju z arbitražno odločbo ali sodbo sodišča ponuja ponovno vzpostavitev poslovnih odnosov med strankami, ki temeljijo na zaupanju;
Acknowledges that one of the main obstacles to the use of ADR systems is the reluctance of businesses to engage in such mechanisms; proposes that chambers of commerce, umbrella organisations at both national and EU level, and other professional bodies be required to inform enterprises of the existence of ADR and of the potential benefits of its use, not least in terms of: pre-empting lawsuits; corporate image; and, lastly, the possibilities offered by ADR, unlike an arbitration or court ruling, for the re-establishment of trust-based commercial relations between the parties;
poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi zbranih podatkov in zanesljive presoje vplivov, skladne s pravili za boljšo zakonodajo, prouči možnost določitve minimalnih standardov alternativnega reševanja sporov med sektorji, hkrati pa razvija že obstoječe sheme in spodbuja države članice in sektorje, ki so vključeni v sheme, naj povečajo financiranje, pri čemer morajo upoštevati, da alternativno reševanje sporov strankam sicer ponuja cenovno ugodno alternativo, ne sme pa postati „cenena pravica“;
Calls on the Commission, on the basis of the data collected and a solid impact assessment in compliance with the better regulation rules, to explore the setting out of minimum standards of ADR across sectors, while developing existing schemes and encouraging Member States and sectors covered by schemes to increase funding, bearing in mind that ADR, while providing parties with a low-cost alternative, must not be ‘justice on the cheap’;
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek II – Svet ( C7-0213/2010 – 2010/2144(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 25 October 2011 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2009, Section II – Council ( C7-0213/2010 – 2010/2144(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Sveta organu, pristojnemu za podeljevanje razrešnice, o notranjih revizijah, opravljenih leta 2009,
having regard to the Council's annual report to the discharge authority on internal audits carried out in 2009,
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2009, skupaj z odgovori institucij UL C 303, 9.11.2010, str.
having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2009, together with the institutions' replies OJ C 303, 9.11.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo predloži Računsko sodišče v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije UL C 308, 12.11.2010, str.
having regard to the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ C 308, 12.11.2010, p.
o odlogu sklepa o podelitvi razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2009 in ob upoštevanju priložene resolucije,
postponing the discharge decision for the financial year 2009, and to the accompanying resolution,
ob upoštevanju drugega poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0328/2011 ),
having regard to the second report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0328/2011 ),
zavrne podelitev razrešnice generalnemu sekretarju Sveta glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Sveta za proračunsko leto 2009;
Refuses to grant the Secretary-General of the Council discharge in respect of the implementation of the Council budget for the financial year 2009;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek II – Svet ( C7-0213/2010 – 2010/2144(DEC) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 October 2011 with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2009, Section II – Council ( C7-0213/2010 – 2010/2144(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju členov 272(10), 274, 275 in 276 Pogodbe o ES ter členov 314(10), 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 272(10) and Articles 274, 275 and 276 of the EC Treaty and Article 314(10) and Articles 317, 318 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
, zlasti njenih členov 50, 86, 145, 146 in 147,
(Financial Regulation), and in particular Articles 50, 86, 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
ker „imajo državljani pravico vedeti, kako se porabijo njihovi davki in kako se uporabljajo pristojnosti, ki so zaupane političnim organom“ Evropska pobuda za preglednost.
whereas ‘citizens have the right to know how their taxes are being spent and how the power entrusted to political bodies is handled’ The European Transparency Initiative.
ker bi morale biti upravne službe Sveta demokratično odgovorne državljanom Unije, kar zadeva porabo sredstev Unije,
whereas the Council administration should be subject to democratic accountability towards Union citizens as far as the implementation of Union funds is concerned,
ker je prav tako pomembno zagotoviti večjo preglednost pri uporabi zakonodaje Unije, in ker imajo evropski državljani pravico biti bolje obveščeni tudi v zvezi s tem, Parlament pozdravlja s Svetom dosežen dogovor glede primerjalnih tabel,
whereas it is also important to ensure greater transparency in the application of Union legislation, and European citizens have the right to be better informed in this respect too, Parliament welcomes the agreement reached with the Council on the subject of correlation tables,
ker je Parlament edini neposredno izvoljeni organ med institucijami Unije in je odgovoren za podelitev razrešnice za izvrševanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije,
whereas Parliament is the sole directly elected body among the Union institutions and has responsibility to grant discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union,
Nerešena vprašanja
Pending issues
obžaluje težave, do katerih je prišlo v postopkih za podelitev razrešnice v obdobju 2007–2009, in potrjuje stališče, ki ga je izrazil v prejšnjih resolucijah o razrešnici za omenjene finančne operacije;
Deplores the difficulties encountered in the 2007-2009 discharge procedures and, in addition, reaffirms its position expressed in its previous discharge resolutions concerning those financial exercises;
potrjuje, da je 28. februarja 2011 prejel pismo generalnega sekretarja Sveta, ki mu je bilo priloženih več dokumentov o postopku razrešnice za Svet za leto 2009 (končni računovodski izkazi za leto 2009, vključno s konti, poročilom o finančni dejavnosti in povzetkom notranjih revizij v letu 2009), in pozdravlja to dejstvo kot konstruktiven korak k zagotavljanju demokratične odgovornosti Sveta za izvrševanje svojega upravnega proračuna;
Acknowledges receipt on 28 February 2011 of a letter from the Secretary-General of the Council containing a number of documents for the 2009 Council discharge procedure (final financial statements of 2009 including accounts, financial activity report and summary of 2009 internal audits) and welcomes this as a constructive step towards ensuring the democratic accountability of the Council's administrative budget;