natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
zato predlaga, da se preuči prožno medsebojno ocenjevanje in, kadar je to ustrezno, uvede za medsebojno ocenjevanje področij politike, ki so zajeta v horizontalnih direktivah, na podlagi katerih so države članice ohranile znaten manevrski prostor, da bi tako dosegli bolj poenoteno zakonodajo, vzpostavili boljše odnose in medsebojno razumevanje med državami članicami ter preprečili pretirano izvajanje pravnih aktov („pozlačevanje“);
Suggests, therefore, that a ‘light-touch’ mutual evaluation to be considered and where appropriate introduced for the mutual evaluation of policy areas covered by ‘horizontal’ directives under which Member States have retained significant scope for manoeuvre, with a view to obtaining more uniform legislation, creating better relations and mutual understanding between the Member States, and preventing ‘gold plating’;
priporoča, da bi se medsebojno ocenjevanje uporabljalo kot prožno sredstvo, za vsak primer posebej; predlaga, da bi ga morali ciljno predlagati za vključitev v izbrane direktive horizontalne narave, ki zahtevajo številne ukrepe za prenos v nacionalno zakonodajo in državam članicam dopuščajo precejšen manevrski prostor; poleg tega predlaga namensko uporabo medsebojnega ocenjevanja, pri čemer bodo predmet postopka samo najpomembnejše določbe posamezne direktive;
Recommends that mutual evaluation should be used as a ‘flexible instrument’ on a case-by-case basis; suggests that the tool should be proposed in a targeted manner for inclusion in selected Directives of a ‘horizontal’ nature which imply numerous transposition measures and provide for a wide margin of discretion for the Member States; suggests furthermore a targeted use of mutual evaluation whereby only a key provisions of a Directive are subject to the procedure;
vseeno poziva Komisijo, naj jasno opredeli cilje in končne rezultate medsebojnega ocenjevanja, preden predlaga medsebojno ocenjevanje za druge direktive, in tako zagotovi, da postopek ne bi po nepotrebnem obremenil ocenjevalnih organov;
Calls on the Commission, however, to clearly define the aims and deliverables of mutual evaluation before proposing mutual evaluation on other Directives, in order to ensure that the process does not impose unnecessary burdens on the evaluating authorities;
meni, da bi „skupinske razprave“ morale ostati osrednja sestavina medsebojnega ocenjevanja; meni, da primerno ciljno, vendar omejeno število strokovnih udeležencev v skupinskih razpravah ustvarja pogoje za učinkovitost in doseganje rezultatov; meni, da bi bilo treba medsebojno ocenjevanje razvijati kot postopek za izmenjavo najboljše prakse in izkušenj pri razvijanju politike med državami članicami ter da bi se lahko vloga Komisije pojasnila v smislu zagotavljanja smernic in usmerjanja postopka, zlasti med temi skupinskimi razpravami; meni, da mora sestava skupin vedno izražati pričakovanja držav članic in morebiten vpliv na enotni trg;
Believes that ‘cluster discussions’ should remain the central element of the mutual evaluation process; considers that a well targeted but limited number of expert participants in cluster discussions creates the conditions for efficiency and delivering outcomes; takes the view that mutual evaluation should be developed further as a procedure for exchanging best practices and policy development experiences between Member States and that the Commission's role could be clarified in terms of providing guidance and steering the process, particularly during these cluster discussions; is of the opinion that the clusters' composition should always reflect Member States' expectations and the potential impact on the Single Market;
poziva Komisijo, naj poveča preglednost z obveščanjem Evropskega parlamenta o vsebini in napredku razprav med državami članicami ter s posredovanjem rednih poročil na različnih stopnjah medsebojnega ocenjevanja za sprotno obveščanje vseh deležnikov; poziva Komisijo, naj javno objavi glavne sklepe skupinskih in plenarnih sej;
Asks the Commission to increase transparency by informing the European Parliament on the contents and progress of discussions between Member States and by presenting regular reports throughout the different stages of mutual evaluation to keep all stakeholders updated; calls on the Commission to make the main conclusions of the cluster and plenary meetings public;
poudarja, da se namen primerjalnih tabel in medsebojnega ocenjevanja razlikuje, zato bi jih bilo treba obravnavati kot ločena orodja politike, ki jih ni mogoče izmenjati med seboj, ter da so korelacijske tabele zato nujne za prenos zakonodaje EU;
Points out that correlation tables and mutual evaluation have different purposes and therefore should be regarded as separate and not interchangeable policy tools, and that the correlation tables are therefore indispensable in the transposition of European legislation;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, and the parliaments of the Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o globalnem gospodarskem upravljanju ( 2011/2011(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 October 2011 on Global Economic Governance ( 2011/2011(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sklepov in sporazumov s srečanj skupine G20 v Londonu, Pittsburghu, Torontu in Seulu,
having regard to the conclusions and agreements of the G20 summits of London, Pittsburgh, Toronto and Seoul,
ob upoštevanju poročila o pobudi Palais-Royal z naslovom Reforma monetarnega sistema: kooperativni pristop za enaindvajseto stoletje, ki je bil objavljen 8. februarja 2011,
having regard to the Palais-Royal Initiative report ‘Reform of the Monetary System: a cooperative approach for the twenty-first century’ published on 8 February 2011,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o izboljšanju gospodarskega upravljanja in okvira stabilnosti Unije, zlasti v euroobmočju Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0377 .
having regard to its resolution of 20 October 2010 on ‘Improving the economic governance and stability framework of the Union, in particular in the euro area’ Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0377 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. maja 2011 z naslovom EU kot globalni akter: njena vloga v mednarodnih organizacijah Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0229 .
having regard to its resolution of 11 May 2011 on ‘the EU as a global actor: its role in multilateral organisations’ Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0229 .
ob upoštevanju stalnega in pomembnega prispevka čezatlantskega dialoga zakonodajalcev ter čezatlantskega poslovnega dialoga,
having regard to the continuous, relevant work of the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue (TLD) and the Transatlantic Business Dialogue (TABD),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7-0323/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade ( A7-0323/2011 ),
ker se je svetovno gospodarstvo v zadnjih desetletjih razvijalo tako, da sta se kljub neenakomerni porazdelitvi na splošno povečali rast in blaginja in je bilo na milijone ljudi rešenih revščine, čeprav je število ljudi, ki živijo v revščini in bedi še vedno nesprejemljivo visoko; ker je treba zmanjšati socialne in ekonomske razlike med državami in v njih samih; ker mora biti boj Evrope zoper revščino ena od najpomembnejših prednostih nalog v strategiji EU 2020;
whereas the development of the world economy during the last decades generally has entailed increased growth and prosperity, although unevenly distributed, lifting millions of people out of poverty; meanwhile, the number of people still living in poverty and despair is unacceptably high; whereas social and economic inequalities between and within countries must be reduced; whereas Europe's fight against poverty must be one of the top priorities for the EU 2020 strategy;
ker se ZDA in Evropa še vedno soočata z najhujšimi posledicami največje mednarodne gospodarske recesije od velike depresije,
whereas the US and Europe are currently still dealing with the worst effects of the worst international economic recession experienced since the Great Depression;
ker je razvoj svetovnega gospodarstva v zadnjih desetletjih utrpel nevzdržna neravnovesja,
whereas the development of the global economy in recent decades has suffered from unsustainable imbalances;
ker bi lahko z učinkovitim svetovnim gospodarskim upravljanjem zmanjšali negativne učinke ter izravnali nevarne posledice globalizacije, denimo povečanje neenakosti in uničevanje okolja,
whereas effective global economic governance would make it possible to minimise the negative impacts and correct the dangerous effects of globalisation, such as the rise in inequality or destruction of the environment;
ker je vstop novih pomembnih akterjev na svetovni trg, tako v smislu svetovne trgovine kot gospodarske rasti, pri čemer prednjačita Kitajska in Indija, bistveno vplival na svetovno gospodarstvo in ga temeljito spremenil, kar kliče po reformah in konvertibilnih menjalnih tečajih;
whereas the emergence of new major players, in terms both of world trade and of economic growth, with China and India as frontrunners, in the world economy has had a profound impact and changed the economic landscape fundamentally, calling for trade reforms and convertible exchange rates;
ker sedanja neravnovesja še vedno nastajajo predvsem zaradi pomanjkanja konkurenčnosti ter zasebnih in javnih prihrankov v državah s primanjkljajem in zaradi velikih prihrankov, povezanih s premajhnim povpraševanjem v državah s presežkom, ki so danes obsežnejša, in ker ta ravnovesja zaradi visoke stopnje globalizacije in obsega kapitalskih tokov ustvarjajo nove izzive za globalno upravljanje in šibijo strukture obstoječih institucionalnih ureditev;
whereas the imbalances of today are still caused primarily by a lack of competitiveness and private and public saving in the deficit countries, and high saving coupled with a lack of demand in the surplus countries, which today are greater in magnitude and whereas, in view of the high degree of globalisation and scale of capital flows, these imbalances make new demands on global governance and challenge the structures of existing institutional arrangements;
ker bistveno prvino za uravnoteženje svetovnega gospodarstva v širšem pomenu sestavlja dvoje: povečana konkurenčnost in celovite reforme, ki bi spodbujale rast v državah s primanjkljajem ter odprtje trgov in zmerna monetarna politika v državah s presežkom;
whereas the main element for rebalancing the global economy in broad terms is twofold: enhanced competitiveness and wide-ranging reforms fostering growth in deficit countries and the opening of markets and sound monetary policy in surplus countries;
ker je prvo desetletje delovanja ekonomske in monetarne unije pokazalo, da je odgovorna proračunska politika eden osnovnih pogojev za čim večje zmanjšanje posledic globalnih finančnih in ekonomskih pretresov,
whereas the first decade of functioning of the EMU has shown that responsible budgetary policy is one of the preconditions for minimising the impact of global financial and economic shocks;
ker obstajajo številne mednarodne organizacije, ki naj bi upravljale svetovno gospodarstvo, kot so Mednarodni denarni sklad, Svetovna banka, Svetovna trgovinska organizacija, Konferenca Združenih narodov za trgovino in razvoj ter Mednarodna finančna korporacija, skupaj z medvladnima skupinama G7 in G20, od katerih sta najučinkovitejša organa Mednarodni denarni sklad in skupina G20, vendar ju je treba še vedno izboljšati,
whereas there is a multitude of international organisations designed to govern the world economy such as the IMF, World Bank, WTO, UNCTAD and the IFC, alongside the inter-governmental fora of the G7 and G20, of which the IMF and G20 are the most effective bodies, although both still need to be improved;
ker so za globalne trge potrebna globalna pravila,
whereas global markets require global rules;
ker je prevladujoča monetarna ureditev v nekaterih državah s presežkom privedla do precejšnjega nakopičenja tujih deviznih rezerv, zlasti ameriškega dolarja, kar je v zameno povečalo ponudbo kapitala v državah s primanjkljajem in ustvarilo pritisk na znižanje stopenj obrestnih mer ter spodbudilo pretirano rast cen premoženja, ki je imela bistveno vlogo v zadnji finančni krizi,
whereas the prevailing monetary arrangements led to substantial accumulation of foreign exchange reserves, particularly the US dollar, in some surplus countries, which in turn increased the supply of capital in deficit countries and exerted downward pressure on interest rates, helping to spur the bubble in asset prices that played a central role in the last financial crisis;
ker je svetovna gospodarska kriza, ki se je začela v finančnem sektorju, privedla do visokih ravni zadolženosti nekaterih vodilnih svetovnih gospodarskih akterjev, vključno z ZDA, Japonsko in EU,
whereas the global economic crisis, which started in the financial sector, has now led to high levels of indebtedness in some of the leading world economic players including the US, Japan and the EU;
ker se skupina G20 v sklepni izjavi iz Pittsburgha o okviru za močno, trajnostno in uravnoteženo rast strinja, da je za odziv na krizo nujno potreben nov večstranski pristop,
whereas the G20 has agreed in its Pittsburgh final declaration on a Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth that a new multilateral approach as a response to the crisis is urgently required;
ker se na splošno priznava vloga, s katero so nekateri sektorji finančne industrije prispevali k svetovni finančni krizi, kar kaže na šibke točke finančne ureditve, poglabljanje državne dolžniške krize ter skupen pogled, da je treba povečati odgovornost in preglednost finančnega sektorja in bi moral ta nositi precejšen delež stroškov, ki jih je povzročila kriza;
whereas there has been global recognition of the role that some sectors of the financial industry played in contributing to the global financial crisis, demonstrating weaknesses in financial regulation, deepening of the sovereign debt crisis and a common understanding that the responsibility and transparency of the financial sector needs to be enhanced, including bearing a fair share of the costs caused by the crisis;
ker so neravnovesja tekočega računa, o katerih se veliko govori, posledica temeljnih strukturnih neravnovesij v nacionalnih gospodarstvih,
whereas the much mentioned current-account imbalances are a result of underlying structural imbalances in the domestic economies;
ker so se zaradi pomanjkanja usklajene in učinkovite ureditve in nadzora svetovnega finančnega sistema pojavile šibkosti finančnega sektorja, ki so posledično povečale ranljivost svetovnega gospodarstva;
whereas the lack of coordinated and effective regulation and supervision of the global financial system led to weaknesses in the financial sector which subsequently exacerbated the vulnerabilities in the global economy;
ker sta okrepljena vloga in ugled skupine G20 kot foruma za neuradne politične razprave na najvišji ravni dobrodošla; ugotavlja, da ta skupina kot institucija nima pravne podlage in stalnega sekretariata, ima pa šibko upravno strukturo, zlasti v primerjavi z drugimi mednarodnimi institucijami, kot sta Mednarodni denarni sklad in Svetovna trgovinska organizacija;
whereas the increased role and prominence of the G20 as a forum for informal political discussions at the highest global level is welcome; whereas the G20 as an institution lacks a legal basis and a permanent secretariat and has a weak governing structure especially in comparison with other international institutions such as the IMF and WTO;
ker je sedanji mednarodni denarni sistem številnim državam omogočil, da so prešle na strategije konkurenčne devalvacije, ki so poleg naraščajočih špekulativnih transakcij močnih tržnih interesnih skupin na deviznem trgu močno prispevale k čezmerni nestanovitnosti cen in ustvarile veliko tveganje za devizne trge ter za mednarodno trgovino;
whereas the current international monetary system has enabled several countries to proceed with competitive devaluation strategies which, together with the growing speculative transactions undertaken by powerful market stakeholders on exchange markets, have severely contributed to excess rate volatility and created significant risks for the exchange markets as well as international trade;
ker EU ne velja za močnega akterja pri prenovi mednarodnega monetarnega in finančnega sistema, saj ne govori z enim glasom, njeno zunanje predstavništvo v mednarodnih gospodarskih zadevah pa je razdrobljeno;
whereas the EU is not perceived as a strong actor in reshaping the international monetary and financial system because it does not speak with one voice, and because of the fragmentation of its external representation in international economic affairs;
ker je bistveno zagotoviti, da gospodarski in finančni sistemi ne bodo ogrožali realnega gospodarstva;
whereas it is essential to ensure that economic and financial systems do not harm the real economy;
ker je Mednarodni denarni sklad v skladu s priporočili skupine G20 prejel večja pooblastila v zvezi z nadzorom in spremljanjem svetovnega finančnega sistema, poleg tega so bila povečana njegova proračunska sredstva in trenutno poteka temeljita reforma njegove strukture upravljanja;
whereas, in accordance with the recommendations of the G20, the IMF has been assigned greater powers of supervision and surveillance of the global financial system, its financial resources have been increased and a thorough reform of its governance structure is under way;
ker so finančni trgi v zadnjih desetletjih začeli delovati globalno z intenzivnimi informacijsko-tehnološkimi procesi in omrežji, standardizacija podatkov pa zaostaja, kar ovira zbiranje, analizo in obravnavo podatkov na trgu in pogosto celo v družbah ter zmanjšuje preglednost finančnih transakcij;
whereas financial markets have evolved over the past decades to operate globally through IT-intensive processes and networks, and data standardisation has lagged behind, hindering market – and often even firm-wide – data aggregation, analysis and operations, and reducing the transparency of financial transactions;
Priporočila glede politike za obravnavanje gospodarskega upravljanja
Policy recommendations to address global economic governance
poudarja, da lahko predvsem pretirana globalna neravnovesja ogrozijo finančno in makroekonomsko stabilnost vodilnih gospodarstev in imajo posledice za druga gospodarstva; zato poudarja, da bi morala neravnovesja zaradi strukturnih neskladij in pomanjkanja konkurenčnosti v domačem gospodarstvu odpraviti države s presežki in primanjkljajem, saj je prav to temeljni vir težav;
Stresses that global imbalances constitute a potential threat to financial and macro-economic stability, especially when excessive, in the leading economies and may have repercussions on other economies; taking this into account, notes that imbalances stemming from structural misalignments and a lack of competitiveness in the domestic economy should be addressed by both surplus and deficit countries, as these could also be a source of fundamental problems;
poudarja, da je finančna in gospodarska kriza pokazala, da bi morali pritok kapitala zaradi svetovnih neravnovesij spremljati odgovorna monetarna politika in močna finančna ureditev ter nadzor;
Stresses that the financial and economic crisis demonstrated that the inflow of capital as a result of global imbalances should be accompanied by responsible monetary policy and strong financial regulation and supervision;
priznava, da morajo oblikovalci politike po svetu še naprej iskati rešitve za reformo globalnega gospodarskega upravljanja, da bi spodbudili ponovno vzpostavitev ravnovesja svetovnega gospodarstva in preprečili novo gospodarsko krizo; poudarja, da bi morala reforma globalnega upravljanja zagotoviti, da bo za trge veljal celovit institucionalni okvir, zato da bodo lahko pravilno delovali; ocenjuje tudi, da mora biti eden izmed prednostnih ciljev svetovnega gospodarskega upravljanja vzpostavitev ugodnega okolja za dolgoročne naložbe;
Recognises the need for policy-makers around the world to continue working on solutions to reform global economic governance to help rebalance the world economy and avoid another slump; stresses that the reform of global governance should ensure that markets are embedded in a comprehensive institutional framework for them to function properly; estimates furthermore that one of the priority objectives of worldwide economic governance must be the creation of a favourable environment for long-term investment;.
poudarja, da je potrebna odgovorna monetarna politika; odločno poziva centralne banke večjih gospodarstev, naj pri izvajanju konvencionalnih ali nekonvencionalnih ukrepov preučijo možne negativne eksternalije, kot so prenapihnjena vrednost sredstev, dinamika strategij valutnega donosa in finančna destabilizacija v drugih državah;
Stresses the importance of responsible monetary policies; urges central banks of major economies to consider potential negative externalities, such as asset bubbles, carry-trade dynamics and financial destabilisation in other countries, when implementing conventional or non-conventional measures;
se zaveda, da so končno zaupanje v moč temeljnega gospodarstva ter globina, preglednost, dodelanost in stabilnost njegovih finančnih trgov poglavitni elementi, zaradi katerih centralne banke tretjih držav hranijo valute kot rezerve; zvezi s tem poudarja, da mora biti vsaka valuta, ki naj bi postala del košarice Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, v kateri so posebne pravice črpanja, popolnoma konvertibilna, in ugotavlja, da bi se moral v sestavi te košarice odražati relativni pomen valut v svetovnih trgovinskih in finančnih sistemih;
Is aware that, ultimately, confidence in the strength of the underlying economy and the depth, transparency, sophistication and stability of its financial markets are the main determinants for which currencies are kept as reserves by third countries' central banks; stresses in regard to this that any currency that seeks to become a part of the IMF's Special Drawing Rights basket must be subject to full convertibility, and acknowledges that the composition of the IMF's SDR basket should reflect the relative importance of currencies in the world's trading and financial systems;
meni, da bi morali menjalni tečaji zaradi večje odprtosti in prožnosti ter spodbujanja gospodarskega prilagajanja odražati poglavitne tržne temelje ter da jih ne bi smeli upravljati ali z njimi manipulirati nacionalni monetarni organi;
States that exchange rates should reflect underlying market fundamentals in order to enhance openness and flexibility and to facilitate economic adjustment, and therefore should not be managed or manipulated by national monetary authorities;
odločno poziva člane Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, naj sprejmejo člene statuta sklada, zlasti zavezo o izogibanju manipulaciji menjalnega tečaja, ter ustrezne določbe splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini in sporazumov STO;
Urges members of the IMF to adhere to the Articles of Agreement, especially the commitment to refrain from manipulating the exchange rate, and the relevant provisions of the GATT and WTO Agreements;
odločno poziva k uporabi posebnih pravic črpanja kot možni nadomestitvi dolarja kot svetovne rezervne valute, kar bi lahko pomagalo pri stabilizaciji svetovnega finančnega sistema; poziva Mednarodni denarni sklad, naj nadalje preuči dodelitev ter širšo uporabo posebnih pravic črpanja, zlasti zaradi okrepitve večstranskega sistema deviznih tečajev;
Urges reconsideration of the use of ‘Special Drawing Rights’ (SDRs) as a possible replacement for the dollar as the world's reserve currency, which could help stabilise the global financial system; asks the IMF to explore further allocation as well as a broader use of Special Drawing Rights (SDR) in particular for the purpose of enhancing the multilateral exchange rate system;