natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva, naj Odbor za peticije zastopa Parlament na javnih predstavitvah v organizaciji Parlamenta in Evropske komisije, na katerih bodo predstavljene tiste državljanske pobude, ki so prejele milijon podpisov, saj bo k predstavitvi lahko prispeval s svojimi izkušnjami in legitimnostjo;
Calls for the Committee on Petitions to be the committee representing the European Parliament at the Parliament and Commission public hearing of representatives who have gathered a million signatures for their citizens' initiatives, thus enabling the hearing to benefit from the committee's experience and legitimacy;
opozarja na Uredbo (EU) št. 211/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o državljanski pobudi UL L 65, 11.3.2011, str.
Draws attention to Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on the citizens' initiative OJ L 65, 11.3.2011, p.
, novem instrumentu za udeležbo državljanov Unije;
, a new instrument enabling citizens to participate in EU business;
poudarja, da Parlament prejema peticije, ki jih je podpisalo več kot milijon ljudi, kar je dokaz njegovih izkušenj v odnosih z državljani, vendar vztraja, da je treba državljanom v celoti predstaviti razliko med tovrstnimi peticijami in državljansko pobudo;
Points out that Parliament receives campaign-type petitions with more than one million signatures, a fact bearing witness to its experience in relations with citizens, but stresses the need to ensure that citizens are made fully aware of the distinction between this type of petition and the citizens' initiative;
opominja, da je z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe postala Listina EU o temeljnih pravicah pravno zavezujoča, in poudarja njen pomen, saj je dala nov zagon dejavnostim EU in držav članic na tem področju; je prepričan, da bo Evropska komisija – kot varuhinja Pogodb – storila vse za učinkovito izvajanje temeljnih pravic, zapisanih v Listini;
Draws attention to the fact that the Charter of Fundamental Rights acquired legally binding force with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and underlines the importance of the Charter, given the new boost it has provided to the activities of the EU and the Member States in this field, and is confident that the European Commission – as guardian of the Treaties – will do everything in its power to ensure the effective implementation of the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter;
je seznanjen s sporočilom Komisije z naslovom „Strategije za učinkovito izvajanje Listine o temeljnih pravicah v Evropski uniji“ in meni, da je treba razvijati, spodbujati in krepiti resnično kulturo temeljnih pravic, ne le v institucijah EU, temveč tudi v državah članicah, zlasti ko uporabljajo in izvajajo zakonodajo Unije; meni, da bi morali biti ukrepi, ki jih strategija navaja za obveščanje o vlogi in pristojnostih Unije v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicam, specifični in izčrpni, da v prihodnje ne bi prihajalo do samovoljnega dodeljevanja in zavračanja pristojnosti med Komisijo in državami članicami, zlasti pri občutljivih temah;
Takes note of the Commission's Declaration entitled ‘Strategy for the effective implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by the European Union’ and considers that a genuine culture of fundamental rights must be developed, promoted and reinforced both in the EU institutions and in the Member States, in particular when they apply and implement EU law; takes the view that the information activities concerning the Union's role and powers in the area of fundamental rights referred to in the ‘Strategy’ should be specific and comprehensive, in order to ensure that powers are not arbitrarily passed back and forth between the Commission and the Member States in the future, particularly in connection with sensitive issues;
vseeno poudarja, da Evropska komisija kljub velikemu številu peticij, ki se nanašajo na pravice iz Listine, zaradi pomanjkanja instrumentov stalno zavrača ukrepe za preprečitev očitnih kršitev temeljnih pravic v državah članica;
Stresses, however, that, in spite of the large number of petitions concerning the rights contained in the Charter, the Commission consistently refuses, owing to a lack of legal instruments, to take action to prevent flagrant breaches of fundamental rights in the Member States;
z zadovoljstvom pozdravlja pristop Unije k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, saj ima tako Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice pristojnosti za nadzor nad ukrepi Unije;
Welcomes EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, since this confers on the European Court of Human Rights the right to scrutinise the EU's actions;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija leto 2013 razglasila za evropsko leto državljanstva, da bi spodbudila razpravo o evropskem državljanstvu ter obveščala državljane EU o njihovih pravicah ter o demokratičnih instrumentih, ki jih imajo na voljo za njihovo uveljavljanje; meni, da bi bilo treba evropsko leto državljanstva izrabiti za obsežno obveščanje o novi „evropski državljanski pobudi“, da bi že na začetku preprečili visok delež nedopustnih pobud glede na delež, ki ga še vedno najdemo pri „peticijah“; podobno meni, da bi bilo treba sprožiti razpravo o omejenem področju uporabe Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah;
Welcomes the Commission's decision to declare 2013 the ‘European Year of Citizenship’ in order to give momentum to the debate on European citizenship and inform EU citizens of their rights and of the democratic instruments available to them to assert those rights; takes the view that the ‘European Year of Citizenship’ should be used for the broad dissemination of information on the new ‘European citizens’ initiative‘, in order to forestall a high rate of inadmissibility comparable to the rate that is still to be found in the ’petitions' field; considers that at the same time a debate should be opened on the limited scope of the ‘Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’;
pozdravlja odprtje „enotnega okenca“ in spletne strani „Vaše pravice v EU“ za državljane, ki iščejo nasvete ali pomoč ali pa se želijo pritožiti; pozdravlja ukrepe Komisije za racionalizacijo obstoječih služb javne pomoči za državljane, ki iščejo informacije o svojih pravicah na ravni EU in o možnostih za pritožbe, ki jih imajo v primeru kršitev; poudarja, da morajo evropske institucije posredovati več informacij in delovati bolj pregledno, zlasti z zagotavljanjem preprostega dostopa do dokumentov;
Welcomes the establishment of the one-stop shop for citizens seeking advice or recourse or making complaints through ‘Your EU Rights’; welcomes the steps taken by the Commission to streamline the existing public assistance services that serve to inform citizens about their rights at EU level and the means of redress available in the event of infringements; stresses that the European institutions need to provide more information and act with greater transparency, in particular by guaranteeing easy access to documents;
opozarja na svojo resolucijo o dejavnostih varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2009 in slednjega poziva, naj zagotovi dostop do informacij in spoštuje pravico do dobrega upravljanja, kar je nujen pogoj za zaupanje javnosti v institucije; podpira priporočilo varuha človekovih pravic Komisiji v zvezi s pritožbo št. 676/2008/RT glede pretiranih zamud, s katerimi Komisija odgovarja varuhu;
Draws attention to its resolution on the activities of the European Ombudsman in 2009 and encourages the Ombudsman to guarantee access to information and respect for the right to good administration, which are indispensible prerequisites for public trust in institutions; endorses the Ombudsman's Recommendation to the Commission in relation to Complaint 676/2008/RT with regard to excessive delays in responding to the Ombudsman;
je seznanjen, da so bile peticije v letu 2010 še naprej osredotočene na okolje, temeljne pravice, pravosodje in notranji trg; dodaja, da se je z geografskega vidika večina peticij nanašala na eno od držav članic – Španijo (16 %) – in Unijo kot celoto (16 %), sledile pa so Nemčija, Italija in Romunija;
Notes that petitions received in 2010 continued to focus on the environment, fundamental rights, the internal market and justice; adds that in geographical terms, the largest proportion of petitions referred to a specific Member State – Spain (16 %) – or the Union as a whole (16 %), followed by Germany, Italy and Romania;
se zaveda, kako pomembno je delo vlagateljev peticij za varstvo okolja v EU, glede na to, da se je večina peticij nanašala na presojo okoljskih vplivov, naravno okolje, odpadne vode, upravljanje kakovosti vode, ohranjanje naravnih virov, kakovost zraka, hrup, ravnanje z odpadki in industrijske izpuste;
Acknowledges the importance of the work of petitioners in protecting the environment in the EU, given that most petitions were connected to environmental impact assessments, the natural environment, wastewater, water quality management, conservation of natural resources, air quality, noise pollution, waste management or industrial emissions;
poudarja pomen sodelovanja med Komisijo in državami članicami in obžaluje malomarnost, ki jo kažejo nekatere med njimi glede izvajanja in uveljavljanja evropske okoljske zakonodaje;
Stresses the importance of cooperation between the Commission and the Member States, and deplores the negligence displayed by certain Member States in connection with the implementation and enforcement of European environmental legislation;
meni, da bi morala Evropska komisija strožje nadzirati spoštovanje in izvajanje evropske okoljske zakonodaje, in sicer v vseh fazah postopka, ne le po sprejetju končne odločitve;
Considers that the Commission should monitor compliance with and implementation of European environmental legislation more strictly at every point in the proceedings, and not only when a final ruling has been given;
deli zaskrbljenost mnogih vlagateljev peticij zaradi nesposobnosti Evropske unije, da bi zagotovila učinkovito izvajanje načrta za biotsko raznovrstnost za leto 2010; z zadovoljstvom pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije z dne 19. januarja 2010 o možnostih za vizijo in cilje EU glede biotske raznovrstnosti po letu 2010 ( KOM(2010)0004 );
Shares the concern expressed by many petitioners at the EU's failure to ensure the effective implementation of the 2010 Biodiversity Action Plan; welcomes the Commission's communication of 19 January 2010 entitled ‘Options for an EU vision and target for biodiversity beyond 2010’ ( COM(2010)0004 );
z zadovoljstvom pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije z dne 2. julija 2009 o smernicah za boljši prenos in učinkovitejšo uporabo Direktive 2004/38/ES o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic ( KOM(2009)0313 ), s katero so opredeljene težave, ki jih vlagatelji peticij pogosto navajajo v zvezi s prenosom te direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo in njenim vplivom na vsakdanje življenje državljanov;
Welcomes the Commission's communication of 2 July 2009 on guidance for better transposition and application of Directive 2004/38/EC on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States ( COM(2009)0313 ), which identifies problems frequently highlighted by petitioners related to transposition of the directive into national law and its incidence on citizens' daily lives;
priznava vlogo mreže SOLVIT, ki redno razkriva težave pri izvajanju pravil o notranjem trgu, na katere opozarjajo vlagatelji peticij, in poziva, naj se Odbor za peticije obvešča o nepravilnostih pri izvajanju zakonodaje EU, saj lahko peticije prispevajo k izboljšanju zakonodaje;
Acknowledges the role of the SOLVIT network, which regularly uncovers problems linked to the application of internal market rules brought to light by petitioners, and calls for the Committee on Petitions to be informed of any cases of incorrect application of EU law, given that the petitions procedure can help improve legislation;
priznava pomembno vlogo Komisije pri delu Odbora za peticije, ki se pri ocenjevanju peticij, odkrivanju kršitev evropske zakonodaje in njihovem odpravljanju še naprej zanaša na njene izkušnje, ter prizadevanja Komisije za skrajšanje običajnega roka (v povprečju štiri mesece) za odziv na prošnje, ki jih Odbor naslovi nanjo v zvezi s preiskavami, da bi bilo mogoče zadeve, na katere opozarjajo državljani, reševati čim hitreje;
Acknowledges the important role that the Commission plays in the work of the Committee on Petitions, which continues to rely on its expertise when assessing petitions, identifying breaches of European law and seeking redress, and appreciates the efforts made by the Commission to improve its overall response time (an average of four months) to the Committee's requests for investigations so that cases reported by citizens can be resolved as quickly as possible;
pozdravlja udeležbo komisarjev na svojih sejah ter njihovo tesno in učinkovito sodelovanje z Odborom, s čimer je bil vzpostavljen pomemben kanal za komunikacijo med državljani in institucijami EU;
Welcomes the attendance at its meetings of various Commissioners, who have cooperated closely and effectively with the Committee on Petitions and set up an important channel of communication between citizens and EU institutions;
kljub vsemu obžaluje, da Komisija še vedno ni ugodila nenehnim prošnjam Odbora za peticije, naj ga obvešča o poteku postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev v zvezi z nerešenimi peticijami, saj mesečna objava odločitev Komisije o postopkih ugotavljanja kršitev v skladu s členoma 258 in 260 Pogodbe ni ustrezen odgovor;
Finds it regrettable, however, that the Commission has yet to address the Committee on Petitions' repeated calls to be kept informed of the progress of infringement proceedings relating to open petitions, since the monthly publication of Commission decisions on infringement proceedings, in accordance with Articles 258 and 260 of the Treaty, does not represent an adequate response;
opozarja, da v mnogih primerih peticije razkrijejo težave, povezane s prenosom in izvrševanjem evropske zakonodaje, in priznava, da začetek postopka ugotavljanja kršitev državljanom ne zagotavlja takojšnjih rešitev za njihove težave; vseeno pa bi lahko uporabili druge načine nadzora in pritiska;
Points out that, in many instances, petitions have uncovered problems related to the transposition and enforcement of European law, and recognises that launching infringement proceedings does not necessarily provide citizens with immediate solutions to their problems; notes, however, that there are other means of monitoring and applying pressure that could be used;
poziva Komisijo, naj ustrezno prizna vlogo peticij pri nadzorovanju učinkovite uporabe prava Unije, saj so ponavadi prvi kazalniki, da države članice zaostajajo pri izvajanju zakonodajnih ukrepov;
Calls on the Commission to duly recognise the role of petitions in monitoring the effective implementation of EU law, since petitions are usually the earliest indications that Member States are lagging behind in implementing legal measures;
pozdravlja udeležbo predstavnikov Sveta na sejah Odbora za peticije, vendar obžaluje, da to sodelovanje ni bolj dejavno, saj bi lahko reševanje peticij, pri katerih je odločilno sodelovanje držav članic, s tem premaknili z mrtve točke;
Welcomes the Council's presence at Petitions Committee meetings, but finds it regrettable that this does not translate into more active cooperation, which could break the stalemate on those petitions in respect of which Member State cooperation would prove decisive;
poudarja, da sta udeležba ter tesno in redno sodelovanje držav članic izjemno pomembna za delo Odbora za peticije; poziva države članice, naj odigrajo proaktivno vlogo pri odzivanju na peticije v zvezi z izvajanjem in uveljavljanjem evropske zakonodaje, in meni, da sta udeležba in aktivno sodelovanje predstavnikov držav članic na srečanjih Odbora za peticije izjemno pomembna;
Stresses that the participation and the close and systematic cooperation of the Member States is extremely important for the work of the Petitions Committee; encourages Member States to play a proactive role in responding to petitions related to the implementation and enforcement of European law, and considers the presence and the active cooperation of Member State representatives at Petitions Committee meetings to be of the utmost importance;
meni, da bi moral Odbor za peticije vzpostaviti tesnejše delovne odnose s sorodnimi odbori regionalnih in nacionalnih parlamentov držav članic ter organizirati misije za ugotavljanje dejstev, da bi spodbudil vzajemno razumevanje peticij o evropskih vprašanjih, hkrati pa bi dobil vpogled v različne načine dela nacionalnih odborov za peticije, kar bi odboru Evropskega parlamenta za peticije omogočalo, da sprejema zavestne in daljnovidne odločitve o zavračanju peticij na podlagi vprašanj pristojnosti;
Considers that the Petitions Committee should forge closer working links with similar committees in Member States' national and regional parliaments and conduct fact-finding missions to promote mutual understanding of petitions on European issues, and vice versa, in order to gain an insight into the various working methods of national petitions committees so that the Petitions Committee of the European Parliament is in a position to take a conscious and farsighted decision when rejecting a petition on grounds of competence issues;
ugotavlja, da narašča število vlagateljev peticij, ki se na Parlament obrnejo po pravna sredstva v primerih, ki ne sodijo v pristojnosti Evropske unije, kot je na primer izvrševanje sodb nacionalnih sodišč ali neukrepanje javne uprave, in namerava omenjene pritožbe posredovati pristojnim nacionalnim oziroma regionalnim organom; odobrava novi postopek, ki sta ga za evidentiranje peticij uvedla generalna direktorata Parlamenta Predsedstvo in IPOL;
Takes note of the number of petitioners who turn to Parliament for redress on issues that fall outside the EU's area of competence – such as the enforcement of national courts' decisions or passivity on the part of various administrations – and points out that Parliament attempts to resolve the situation by forwarding these complaints to the competent authorities; welcomes the new procedure put in place by Parliament's DG Presidency and DG IPOL with regard to the registration of petitions;
opozarja, da je treba poskrbeti za večjo preglednost upravljanja peticij: interno tako, da se poslancem omogoči neposreden dostop do arhivov peticij prek programa E-peticije, poenostavi notranji postopek in vzpostavi tesno sodelovanje med poslanci, predsednico Odbora za peticije in njegovim sekretariatom, eksterno pa z vzpostavitvijo interaktivnega portala za vlagatelje peticij; poleg tega bi morali imeti poslanci prek programa E-peticije dostop do peticij, katerih vlagatelji so želeli ostati anonimni;
Points out the need to bring greater transparency to the management of petitions: internally by giving Members direct access to petition files via the E-petition application, by simplifying the internal procedure and by close cooperation between the members, the Chair and the secretariat of the Committee on Petitions, and externally by establishing an interactive Web portal for petitioners; considers, moreover, that Members should have access in the e-Petition application to petitions from petitioners who have requested anonymity;
poziva k takojšnji vzpostavitvi spletnega portala za peticije, ki bo ponujal interaktivno predlogo za evidentiranje peticij ter informacije za državljane o področju pristojnosti Parlamenta in o tem, kaj je mogoče doseči z vložitvijo peticije pri njem, pa tudi povezave z drugimi možnostmi za popravo krivic tako na evropski kot na nacionalni ravni ter podrobno predstavitev pristojnosti Evropske unije, da se prepreči zmeda glede evropskih in nacionalnih pooblastil;
Calls for the creation, as a matter of urgency, of a dedicated Web portal for petitions, offering an interactive template for the recording thereof and providing information for citizens about Parliament's remit and what can be achieved by petitioning it, as well as links to alternative means of redress at European and national level and a comprehensive description of the EU's powers so as to eliminate confusion between the competences of the EU and those of the Member States;
poziva svoje upravne službe, naj dejavno sodelujejo z Odborom za peticije, da bo ta lahko poiskal ustreznejše rešitve, saj bi tak portal veliko prispeval k boljši komunikaciji med Parlamentom in državljani EU ter slednjim omogočil, da podpišejo peticije ali izbrišejo svoj podpis z njih (v skladu s členom 202 Poslovnika);
Urges its relevant administrative services to cooperate actively with the Committee on Petitions to find the most suitable solutions in this regard, as such a portal would make a meaningful contribution both to improving communications between Parliament and EU citizens and in enabling citizens to sign up to, or remove their names from, petitions (in accordance with Rule 202 of the Rules of Procedure);
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in poročilo Odbora za peticije posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, vladam in parlamentom držav članic in njihovim odborom za peticije ter varuhom človekovih pravic oziroma podobnim pristojnim organom.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of the Committee on Petitions to the Council, the Commission, the European Ombudsman, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, their committees on petitions and their ombudsmen or similar competent bodies.
ob upoštevanju svojih izjav z dne 22. aprila 2008 o odpravi uličnega brezdomstva UL C 259 E, 29.10.2009, str.
having regard to its declarations of 22 April 2008 on ending street homelessness OJ C 259 E, 29.10.2009, p.
in z dne 16. decembra 2010 o strategiji EU za brezdomstvo Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0499 .
and of 16 December 2010 on an EU homelessness strategy Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0499 .
ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti člena 34,
having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, especially its Article 34,
ob upoštevanju revidirane Evropske socialne listine Sveta Evrope, zlasti člena 31,
having regard to the revised European Social Charter of the Council of Europe, especially its Article 31,
ob upoštevanju skupnega poročila Komisije in Sveta o socialni zaščiti in socialni vključenosti iz leta 2010,
having regard to the 2010 Joint Report of the Commission and the Council on Social Protection and Social Inclusion,
ob upoštevanju izjave Sveta z dne 6. decembra 2010 o evropskem letu boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti: skupaj v boju proti revščini v letu 2010 in po njem,
having regard to the Council Declaration of 6 December 2010 on The European Year for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion: Working together to fight poverty in 2010 and beyond,
ob upoštevanju končnih priporočil Evropske konference o soglasju na področju brezdomstva, ki je potekala 9. in 10. decembra 2010,
having regard to the final recommendations of the European Consensus Conference on Homelessness of 9 and 10 December 2010,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. decembra 2010 o evropski platformi proti revščini in socialni izključenosti: evropski okvir za socialno in teritorialno kohezijo ( KOM(2010)0758 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 16 December 2010 on The European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion: A European framework for social and territorial cohesion ( COM(2010)0758 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenj Odbora regij z dne 3. junija 1999 o nastanitvi in brezdomcih (CdR 376/98 konč.), z dne 6. oktobra 2010 o boju proti brezdomstvu (CdR 18/2010 konč.) in z dne 31. marca 2011 o evropski platformi proti revščini in socialni izključenosti (CdR 402/2010 konč.),
having regard to the Opinions of the Committee of the Regions of 3 June 1999 on Housing and the homeless (CdR 376/98 fin), of 6 October 2010 on Combating homelessness (CdR 18/2010 fin) and of 31 March 2011 on The European platform against poverty and social exclusion (CdR 402/2010 fin),