natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da je treba v zvezi s tem posebno pozornost nameniti upravljavcem podatkov, ki jih veže poklicna molčečnost, ter meni, da bi bilo treba v njihovem primeru razmisliti o vzpostavitvi posebnih struktur za nadzor varstva podatkov;
Recalls that in this context special attention must be paid to data controllers who are subject to professional secrecy obligations and that the building of special structures for data protection supervision should be considered in their case;
pozdravlja in podpira premislek Komisije glede uvedbe načela odgovornosti, ki je bistvenega pomena za zagotovitev, da upravljavci podatkov ravnajo v skladu s svojo odgovornostjo; hkrati poziva Komisijo, naj skrbno preuči, kako bi bilo mogoče tako načelo izvajati v praksi, ter oceni posledice tega izvajanja;
Welcomes and supports the Commission's consideration of the introduction of a principle of accountability, as it is of key importance in ensuring that data controllers act in accordance with their responsibility; at the same time calls on the Commission to carefully examine how such a principle could be implemented in practice and to assess the consequences thereof;
pozdravlja možnost, da bi postalo imenovanje pooblaščencev za varstvo podatkov podjetij obvezno, saj so izkušnje držav članic EU, ki so že imenovale pooblaščence za varstvo podatkov, pokazale, da je koncept uspešen; vendar poudarja, da je treba to previdno preučiti v primeru malih in mikropodjetij ter tako preprečiti, da bi se tem podjetjem naložili pretirani stroški ali bremena;
Welcomes the possibility of making the appointment of organisation data protection officers mandatory, as the experience of EU Member States which already have data protection officers shows that the concept has proved successful; points out, however, that this must be carefully assessed in the case of small and micro-enterprises with a view of avoiding excessive costs or burden upon them;
pri tem pozdravlja tudi prizadevanja za poenostavitev in uskladitev sedanjega sistema obveščanja;
Also welcomes, in this context, the efforts being made to simplify and harmonise the current notification system;
meni, da je zelo pomembno, da postanejo ocene učinkov na zasebnost obvezne, saj je tako mogoče ugotoviti tveganja za zasebnost, predvideti morebitne težave in predlagati proaktivne rešitve;
Considers it essential to make Privacy Impact Assessments mandatory in order to identify privacy risks, foresee problems, and bring forward proactive solutions;
meni, da je izvršljivost pravic oseb, na katere se podatki nanašajo, zelo pomembna; ugotavlja, da bi lahko uvedli skupinske tožbe, v okviru katerih bi posamezniki lahko skupinsko branili svoje pravice do varstva podatkov in zahtevali nadomestilo škode, nastale zaradi kršitve varstva podatkov; kljub temu ugotavlja, da bi za takšno uvedbo morale veljati nekatere omejitve, ki bi preprečevale zlorabo; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni razmerje med tem sporočilom o varstvu podatkov in sedanjim javnim posvetovanjem o kolektivnih pravnih sredstvih; zato poziva k vzpostavitvi kolektivnega mehanizma za kršitve pravil o varstvu podatkov, ki bo osebam, na katere se podatki nanašajo, omogočil, da prejmejo nadomestilo za povzročeno škodo;
Considers it of utmost importance that data subjects' rights are enforceable; notes that class-action lawsuits could be introduced as a tool for individuals to collectively defend their data rights and seek reimbursement of damages resulting from a data breach; notes, however, that any such introduction must be subject to limits in order to avoid abuses; asks the Commission to clarify the relationship between this communication on data protection and the current public consultation on collective redress; calls therefore for a collective redress mechanism for breach of data protection rules to allow data subjects to get compensation for the damages suffered;
poudarja potrebo po pravilno usklajenem izvrševanju predpisov po vsej EU; poziva Komisijo, naj za napačno uporabo in zlorabo osebnih podatkov v zakonodajnemu predlogu predpiše stroge in odvračilne sankcije, vključno s kazenskimi;
Highlights the need for proper harmonised enforcement across the EU; calls on the Commission to provide in its legislative proposal for severe and dissuasive sanctions, including criminal sanctions, for misuse and abuse of personal data;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj uvede sistem obveznega obveščanja o kršitvah pri varstvu osebnih podatkov, tako da ga poleg telekomunikacijskega sektorja razširi tudi na druge sektorje, hkrati pa zagotovi, (a) da se sistem ne bo sprevrgel v rutinsko opozarjanje na vse vrste kršitev, temveč bo opozarjal le na tiste, ki lahko imajo negativne učinke za posameznika, ter (b) da bodo vse kršitve zabeležene in na voljo organom za varstvo podatkov ali drugim ustreznim organom za pregled in oceno, tako da se zagotovijo enaki pogoji in enotno varstvo za vse posameznike;
Encourages the Commission to introduce a system of mandatory general personal data breach notifications by extending it to sectors other than the telecommunications sector, while ensuring that (a) it does not become a routine alert for all sorts of breaches, but relates mainly to those that may impact negatively on the individual and (b) that all breaches without exception are logged and at the disposal of data protection or other appropriate authorities for inspection and evaluation, thus ensuring a level playing field and uniform protection for all individuals;
meni, da koncepta „vgrajene zasebnosti“ in „samodejne zasebnosti“ krepita varstvo podatkov, in podpira njuno dejansko uporabo in nadaljnji razvoj ter potrebo po spodbujanju uporabe tehnologij za boljše varovanje zasebnosti; poudarja, da mora biti vsako izvajanje „vgrajene zasebnosti“ osnovano na zanesljivih in konkretnih merilih ter opredelitvah, da se zaščiti pravica posameznikov do varovanja zasebnosti in osebnih podatkov, in se zagotovijo pravna varnost, preglednost, enaki pogoji in prosto gibanje; meni, da bi morala „vgrajena zasebnost“ temeljiti na načelu zmanjšanja količine podatkov, kar pomeni, da bi morali biti vsi proizvodi, storitve in sistemi oblikovani tako, da bi zbirali, uporabljali in posredovali le osebne podatke, ki so nujno potrebni za njihovo delovanje;
Sees in the concepts of ‘privacy by design’ and ‘privacy by default’ a strengthening of data protection, and supports their concrete application and further development as well as the need to promote the use of Privacy Enhancing Technologies; highlights the need for any implementation of ‘privacy by design’ to be based on sound and concrete criteria and definitions in order to protect individuals' right to privacy and data protection, and to ensure legal certainty, transparency, a level playing field and free movement; believes that ‘privacy by design’ should be based on the principle of data minimisation, meaning that all products, services and systems should be built in such a way as to collect, use and transmit only the personal data that are absolutely necessary to their functioning;
ugotavlja, da razvoj in širša uporaba računalništva v oblaku sproža nove izzive glede zasebnosti in varstva osebnih podatkov; zato poziva k pojasnitvi zmogljivosti upravljavcev in obdelovalcev podatkov ter gostiteljev, da bi bolje porazdelili ustrezno pravno odgovornost in zagotovili, da posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo osebni podatki, vedo, kje so njihovi podatki shranjeni, kdo ima dostop do njih, kdo odloča o njihovi uporabi in kateri procesi varnostnega kopiranja in obnavljanja podatkov se uporabljajo;
Notes that the development and broader use of cloud computing raises new challenges in terms of privacy and protection of personal data; calls, therefore, for clarification of the capacities of data controllers, data processors and hosts in order better to allocate the corresponding legal responsibilities and to ensure that data subjects know where their data are stored, who has access to their data, who decides on the use to which the personal data will be put, and what kind of back-up and recovery processes are in place;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri reviziji Direktive 95/46/ES ustrezno upošteva vprašanja, povezana z računalništvom v oblaku, ter zagotovi, da se bodo pravila o varstvu podatkov uporabljala za vse zainteresirane stranke, vključno s telekomunikacijskimi in ne-telekomunikacijskimi operaterji;
Calls on the Commission, therefore, to take due account of data protection issues related to cloud computing when revising Directive 95/46/EC, and to ensure that data protection rules apply to all interested parties, including telecom operators and non telecom operators;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo vsi internetni operaterji prevzeli odgovornost za varstvo podatkov, ter poziva oglaševalska podjetja in izdajatelje, naj uporabnike interneta jasno obveščajo o vseh podatkih, ki se o njih zbirajo;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that all internet operators assume their responsibilities with regard to data protection, and urges advertising-space agencies and publishers to clearly inform internet users in advance about the collection of any data relating to them;
pozdravlja novo podpisani sporazum o okviru za oceno učinka aplikacij za radiofrekvenčno identifikacijo na varstvo zasebnosti in podatkov, katerega namen je zagotoviti zasebnost potrošnikov pred uvedbo oznak za radiofrekvenčno identifikacijo na danem trgu;
Welcomes the newly signed agreement on a Privacy and Data Protection Impact Assessment Framework for Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) applications, which seeks to ensure consumer privacy before RFID tags are introduced onto a given market;
podpira prizadevanja za razvoj samoregulativnih pobud – kot so kodeksi ravnanja – in razmislek o vzpostavitvi prostovoljnih shem potrjevanja EU kot ukrepov, ki dopolnjujejo zakonodajne ukrepe, hkrati pa vztraja, da model varstva podatkov v EU temelji na zakonodaji, ki določa visoko stopnjo jamstev; poziva Komisijo, naj opravi oceno učinka samoregulativne pobude kot orodja za boljše izvajanje pravil o varstvu podatkov.
Supports the efforts to further advance self-regulatory initiatives – such as codes of conduct – and the reflection on setting up voluntary EU certification schemes, as complementary steps to legislative measures, while maintaining that the EU data protection regime is based on legislation setting high-level guarantees; calls on the Commission to carry out an impact assessment of self-regulatory initiatives as tools for better enforcement of data protection rules;
meni, da bi morala biti pri vseh shemah potrjevanja ali pečatov zagotovljena zaupnost in zanesljivost ter da bi morale biti nevtralne glede tehnologije, globalno prepoznavne in cenovno sprejemljive, da ne bi bilo ovir že pred vstopom vanje;
Believes that any certification or seal scheme must be of guaranteed integrity and trustworthiness, technology-neutral, globally recognisable and affordable, so as not to create barriers to entry;
je za nadaljnjo pojasnitev, okrepitev in uskladitev statusa ter pristojnosti nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov in proučitev načinov za zagotavljanje bolj usklajene uporabe pravil EU o varstvu podatkov na notranjem trgu; nadalje poudarja pomen zagotavljanja skladnosti med pristojnostmi evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov, nacionalnih organov, pristojnih za varstvo podatkov, in delovne skupine iz člena 29;
Is in favour of further clarifying, strengthening and harmonising the status and powers of national data protection authorities, and of exploring ways to ensure more consistent application of EU data protection rules across the internal market; emphasises, furthermore, the importance of ensuring coherence among the competencies of the EDPS, the national data protection authorities and Working Party 29;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba v zvezi s tem okrepiti vlogo in pristojnosti delovne skupine iz člena 29, s čimer bi izboljšali usklajevanje in sodelovanje med organi držav članic za varstvo podatkov, zlasti glede nujnosti ohranjanja enotne uporabe pravil o varstvu podatkov;
Emphasises in this context that the role and powers of the Article 29 Working Party should be strengthened in order to improve coordination and cooperation among the Data Protection Authorities of the Member States, especially in terms of the need to safeguard uniform application of data protection rules;
poziva Komisijo, naj v novem zakonodajnem okviru pojasni ključni pojem neodvisnosti nacionalnih organov za varstvo podatkov V skladu s členom 16 PDEU in členom 8 Listine.
Calls on the Commission to clarify in the new legal framework the essential notion of independence of national data protection authorities in the sense of absence of any external influence In line with Article 16 TFEU and Article 8 of the Charter.
, ki mora temeljiti na odsotnost zunanjih vplivov; poudarja, da bi morali nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov prejeti ustrezne vire in usklajena pooblastila za preiskovanje in kaznovanje;
; stresses that the national data protection authorities should be given the necessary resources and be vested with harmonised investigative and sanctioning powers;
poziva Komisijo, naj s pravno zavezujočimi sporazumi in zavezujočimi poslovnimi pravili uskladi in okrepi veljavne postopke mednarodnega prenosa podatkov in opredeli ambiciozne osrednje vidike varstva podatkov v EU, utemeljene na zgoraj navedenih načelih varstva osebnih podatkov, ki se naj jih uporablja v mednarodnih sporazumih; poudarja, da morajo določbe v sporazumih o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki jih EU sklene s tretjimi državami, evropskim državljanom zagotavljati enako raven varstva osebnih podatkov, kot so je deležni v EU;
Calls on the Commission to streamline and strengthen current procedures for international data transfers – legally binding agreements and binding corporate rules – and to define on the basis of the personal data protection principles referred to above the ambitious core EU data protection aspects to be used in international agreements; stresses that the provisions of EU personal data protection agreements with third countries should give European citizens the same level of personal data protection as that provided within the European Union;
meni, da bi postopku Komisije za ugotavljanje ustreznosti koristila dodatna pojasnitev, strožje izvajanje, uveljavitev in spremljanje ter da je treba bolje opredeliti merila in zahteve za oceno ravni varstva podatkov v tretji državi ali mednarodni organizaciji, ob upoštevanju novih groženj za zasebnost in osebne podatke;
Takes the view that the adequacy procedure of the Commission would benefit from further clarification and stricter implementation, enforcement and monitoring, and that the criteria and requirements for assessing the level of data protection in a third country or an international organisation should be better specified taking into account the new threats to privacy and personal data;
poziva Komisijo, naj skrbno oceni učinkovitost in pravilno uporabo načel varnega pristana (Safe Harbour Principles);
Calls on the Commission to assess carefully the effectiveness and correct application of the Safe Harbour Principles;
pozdravlja stališče Komisije o vzajemnosti pri stopnjah varstva podatkov posameznikov, katerih podatki se prenašajo iz EU v tretje države ali so tam shranjeni; poziva Komisijo, naj si odločno prizadeva za okrepljeno regulativno sodelovanje s tretjimi državami, da se pojasnijo veljavna pravila in se zakonodaja o varstvu podatkov v tretjih državah približa zakonodaji EU na tem področju; poziva Komisijo, naj to temo uvrsti med prednostne naloge dnevnega reda obnovljenega čezatlantskega ekonomskega sveta;
Welcomes the Commission's stance on reciprocity in levels of protection regarding data subjects whose data are exported to, or held in, third countries; calls on the Commission to take decisive steps towards enhanced regulatory cooperation with third countries with a view to clarifying the applicable rules and the convergence of EU and third-country data protection legislation; calls on the Commission to bring this forward as a priority agenda item in the relaunched Transatlantic Economic Council;
podpira prizadevanja Komisije za okrepitev sodelovanja s tretjimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami, vključno z Organizacijo združenih narodov, Svetom Evrope in Organizacijo za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj ter organizacijami za standardizacijo, kot so Evropski odbor za standardizacijo, Mednarodna organizacija za standardizacijo, Konzorcij za svetovni splet (W3C) in Projektna skupina za internetno tehnologijo (IETF); spodbuja razvoj mednarodnih standardov Glej madridsko deklaracijo: Splošni standardi zasebnosti v globalnem svetu iz oktobra 2009 in Resolucija o mednarodnih standardih, sprejeta na 32. mednarodni konferenci komisarjev za varstvo podatkov in zasebnost v Jeruzalemu od 27. do 29. oktobra 2010.
Supports the Commission's efforts to enhance cooperation with third countries and international organisations, including the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the OECD, as well as with standardisation organisations such as the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF); encourages the development of international standards See the Madrid Declaration: Global Privacy Standards for a Global World October 2009 and Resolution on International Standards adopted by the 32nd International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy Commissioners, Jerusalem 27-29 October 2010.
ob hkratnem zagotavljanju skladnosti med pobudami za mednarodne standarde in revizijami, ki trenutno potekajo v EU, Organizaciji za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj ter Svetu Evrope;
, while ensuring that there is coherence among initiatives for international standards and current revisions in the EU, the OECD and the Council of Europe;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. julija 2011 o stališču Sveta v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom, spremembah uredb (ES) št. 1924/2006 in (ES) št. 1925/2006 ter razveljavitvi direktiv 87/250/EGS, 90/496/EGS, 1999/10/ES, 2000/13/ES, 2002/67/ES, 2008/5/ES in Uredbe (ES) št. 608/2004 (17602/1/2010 – C7-0060/2011 – 2008/0028(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 July 2011 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 and repealing Directives 87/250/EEC, 90/496/EEC, 1999/10/EC, 2000/13/EC, 2002/67/EC, 2008/5/EC and Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 (17602/1/2010 – C7-0060/2011 – 2008/0028(COD) )
ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta iz prve obravnave (17602/1/2010 – C7-0060/2011 ) UL C 102 E, 2.4.2011, str.1.
having regard to the Council position at first reading (17602/1/2010 - C7-0060/2011 ) OJ C 102 E, 2.4.2011, p 1.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave Sprejeta besedila dne 16.6.2010, P7_TA(2010)0222 .
having regard to its position at first reading Texts adopted of 16.6.2010, P7_TA(2010)0222 .
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0040 ),
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0040 ),
ob upoštevanju zaveze predstavnika Sveta v pismu z dne 22.6.2011, o odobritvi stališča Parlamenta v drugi obravnavi, v skladu s členom 294(8)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 22.6.2011 to approve Parliament's position at second reading, in accordance with Article 294(8)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0177/2011 ),
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0177/2011 ),
sprejme stališče v drugi obravnavi, kakor je navedeno v nadaljevanju;
Adopts its position at second reading hereinafter set out;
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta sprejeto v drugi obravnavi dne 6. julija 2011 z namenom sprejetja Uredbe (EU) št. .../2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom, spremembah uredb (ES) št. 1924/2006 in (ES) št. 1925/2006 ter razveljavitvi direktiv 87/250/EGS, 90/496/EGS, 1999/10/ES, 2000/13/ES, 2002/67/ES, 2008/5/ES in Uredbe (ES) št. 608/2004
Position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 6 July 2011 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EU) No.../2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 and repealing Directives 87/250/EEC, 90/496/EEC, 1999/10/EC, 2000/13/EC, 2002/67/EC, 2008/5/EC and Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 (17602/1/2010 – C7-0060/2011 – 2008/0028(COD) )
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. julija 2011.
Position of the European Parliament of 6 July 2011.
Člen 169 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) določa, da Unija prispeva k doseganju visoke ravni varstva potrošnikov z ukrepi, ki jih sprejme v skladu s členom 114 Pogodbe.
Article 169 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides that the Union is to contribute to the attainment of a high level of consumer protection by the measures it adopts pursuant to Article 114 thereof.
Prosti pretok varnih in kakovostnih živil je pomemben vidik notranjega trga in znatno prispeva k zdravju in dobremu počutju državljanov ter k njihovim socialnim in gospodarskim interesom.
The free movement of safe and wholesome food is an essential aspect of the internal market and contributes significantly to the health and well-being of citizens, and to their social and economic interests.
Za doseganje visoke ravni varovanja zdravja potrošnikov in zagotovitev njihove pravice do obveščenosti bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da so potrošniki ustrezno obveščeni o živilih, ki jih uživajo.
In order to achieve a high level of health protection for consumers and to guarantee their right to information, it should be ensured that consumers are appropriately informed as regards the food they consume.
Na izbire potrošnikov lahko med drugim vplivajo zdravstveni, gospodarski, okoljski, socialni in etični vidiki.
Consumers' choices can be influenced by, inter alia, health, economic, environmental, social and ethical considerations.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane UL L 31, 1.2.2002, str.
According to Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p.
, je določeno splošno načelo živilske zakonodaje, to je zagotoviti potrošnikom podlago za ozaveščeno izbiro v zvezi z živili, ki jih uživajo, ter preprečiti vse postopke, ki bi lahko potrošnika zavajali.
it is a general principle of food law to provide a basis for consumers to make informed choices in relation to food they consume and to prevent any practices that may mislead the consumer.
V Direktivi 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu UL L 149, 11.6.2005, str.
Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p.
so zajeti nekateri vidiki zagotavljanja informacij potrošnikom, zlasti za preprečevanje zavajajočih dejanj in opustitev informacij.
covers certain aspects of the provision of information to consumers specifically to prevent misleading actions and omissions of information.