natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je seznanjen z bolj sistematično uporabo preveč odprtih razpisov za zbiranje predlogov (pristop od spodaj navzgor), s katerim naj bi zagotovili dolgoročne raziskovalne zmogljivosti; poudarja, da je treba vseeno ohraniti ravnovesje med obema pristopoma (od spodaj navzgor in od zgoraj navzdol), saj vsak ustreza posebnim potrebam; poudarja, da se je treba pri določanju raziskovalnih načrtov posvetovati in sodelovati z raziskovalci, industrijo in akterji civilne družbe;
Recognises the more systematic use of overly open calls for proposals (bottom-up approach) to ensure a long-term capacity for research; stresses the need, however, to maintain the balance between the two approaches (bottom-up and top-down), which each meet specific needs; stresses the need to consult and work together with the researchers, the industry and civil society actors, in order to set the research agendas;
meni, da je treba zlasti glede na strategijo 2020 in cilj „pametne rasti“ določiti skupna raziskovalna področja med tistimi, ki obetajo največ z vidika konkretne uporabe, kar bo omogočilo visoko raven izmenjave v etičnem okviru; poudarja, da bi takšna področja lahko tvorila skupno raziskovalno platformo, ki bi jo financirala EU, podprta pa bi bila s skupnim omrežjem za izmenjavo podatkov, kar je treba obravnavati kot zelo pomemben prednostni interes;
Believes that given, notably, the EU 2020 strategy and the objective of ‘intelligent growth’, it is necessary to identify common research areas among those which appear most promising in terms of concrete applications enabling the highest extent of sharing in an ethical context; points out that such areas could form part of a common research platform financed by the EU and supported by a common network for data exchange, which should be treated as being of major importance and priority interest;
dvomi, da je velikokrat možno financirati samo eno ponudbo na razpis, kar pomeni tratenje sredstev, ki so bila vložena v pripravo in ocenjevanje odličnih predlogov, ter odrekanje financiranja nekaterim odličnim zamislim; poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o možnem financiranju odličnih neizbranih raziskovalnih predlogov prek dodatnega raziskovalnega proračuna (ki bi dopolnjeval sredstva za raziskave), v katerega bi prispevale države članice, regionalni in strukturni skladi ter zasebni sektor;
Is sceptical about the fact that it is frequently only possible to fund one - and only one - proposal per call, which leads to a waste of the resources invested in preparing and evaluating excellent proposals and the non-funding of some excellent ideas; calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of funding excellent, non-selected research proposals, through an additional research budget (matching research funds) to which Member States, regional and structural funds and the private sector will contribute;
poudarja pomen neposrednih dejavnosti Skupnega raziskovalnega središča in njihov prispevek k trajnostnemu razvoju, konkurenčnosti, zaščiti in varnosti jedrske energije;
Underlines the importance of the direct actions of the Joint Research Centre and their contribution to sustainable development, competitiveness and the security and safety of nuclear energy;
priznava pomen projekta črnomorskih medsebojnih povezav za vzpostavitev regionalne raziskovalne in izobraževalne mreže v širši črnomorski regiji ter njeno povezavo s komunikacijsko mrežo visoke zmogljivosti in hitrosti za vse raziskovalce v Evropi (GEANT) ter poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej podpira raziskovalne projekte v črnomorski regiji, kot so HP-SEE, SEE-GRID, SCENE, CAREN in BSRN;
Recognises the importance of the BSI (Black Sea Interconnection) project in terms of creating a regional research and education network in the greater Black Sea area and linking it to GEANT, and calls on the Commission to continue to support research projects in the BSR (Black Sea Region) such as HP-SEE, SEE-GRID, SCENE, CAREN and BSRN;
poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa in prihodnjega finančnega okvira zagotovi ustrezno raven financiranja za raziskave in razvoj za storitve in aplikacije globalnega satelitskega navigacijskega sistema (GNSS);
Calls on the Commission to ensure, in the context of FP7 and the future financial framework, an appropriate level of R&D funding for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications and services;
poudarja, da mora raziskovanje v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa potekati skladno s temeljnimi pravicami, kot so zapisane v Evropski listini; zato odločno poziva Komisijo, naj takoj predloži vse ustrezne dokumente o projektu INDECT (raziskovalni projekt, financiran v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa, katerega cilj je razvitje samodejnega sistema za opazovanje, ki bo nenehno spremljal spletne strani, nadzorne kamere in posamezne računalniške sisteme) in določi jasen in natančen okvir za raziskovalni cilj, izvajanje in končne uporabnike tega projekta; poudarja, da projekt INDECT ne bi smel prejeti sredstev iz sedmega okvirnega programa, dokler se temeljito ne preučijo možni učinki za temeljne pravice;
Stresses that all research conducted within the FP7 must be conducted in accordance with fundamental rights as expressed in the European Charter; therefore, strongly urges the Commission to immediately make all documents related to INDECT (a research project funded by the FP7 aimed at developing an automated observation system that constantly monitors web sites, surveillance cameras and individual computer systems) available and to define a clear and strict mandate for the research goal, the application and the end users of INDECT; stresses that before a thorough investigation on the possible impacts on fundamental rights is made, INDECT should not receive funding from the FP7;
Sodelovanje v sedmem okvirnem programu
Participation in FP7
poudarja, da ni videti, da bi bila stopnja udeležbe industrije večja v primerjavi s prejšnjimi okvirnimi programi, zlasti v delu „Sodelovanje“; zato poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi podrobno analizo zmogljivosti tega dela, da bi bolje vključila naložbe zasebnega sektorja;
Stresses that industry's participation rates do not appear any higher than in previous FPs, particularly under the ‘Cooperation’ chapter; thus calls on the Commission to carry out a detailed analysis of the Programme's capacity to better leverage private sector investment;
meni, da bi morali postopki konkurenčnih razpisov za dodatne partnerje temeljiti na osnovni predpostavki, da imajo vključena podjetja in raziskovalci najbolj poglobljeno znanje o projektu in partnerju, ki ga najbolj potrebujejo, zato bi bilo bolje, če jih Komisija ne bi silila k uporabi prednostnih seznamov strokovnjakov za vrednotenje, ampak bi ocenila pisno obrazložitev izbire konzorcija;
Believes that the procedures of competitive calls for additional partners should be based on the basic premise that the companies and researchers involved have the deepest knowledge of the project and which partner it needs best and that, rather than forcing them to follow the ranking lists of the evaluation experts, the Commission should evaluate a written justification of the consortium's choice;
pozdravlja rezultate sedmega okvirnega programa v korist malih in srednjih podjetij, kar zadeva cilj 15 %, določen v delu Sodelovanje, in program Eurostars; da bi še bolj olajšali sodelovanje malih in srednjih podjetij, poziva k objavljanju netematskih pozivov za ta podjetja, pri čemer bi pogosteje objavili poziv za zbiranje predlogov za specifične dejavnosti malih ni srednjih podjetij (ali da bi imeli celo trajno odprt poziv), k nadaljnji poenostavitvi pravil (tudi pravil programa Eurostars) in k skrajšanju časa za podelitev nepovratnih sredstev; priporoča, naj se mala in srednja podjetja dejavneje vključijo v postopek izkoriščanja doseženih rezultatov;
Welcomes the results of FP7 in favour of SMEs, as regards both the SME-support measures in the ‘Capacity’ chapter, the ‘Eurostars’ programme and the 15% target set in the ‘Cooperation’ chapter; in order to further facilitate SME participation, calls for issuing more non-thematic calls for SMEs, opening more often a call for proposals for SME specific activities (or having a permanently open call), further simplifying the rules (including the rules for the ‘Eurostars’ programme) and shortening the time-to-grant periods; recommends that SMEs are more actively involved in the process of exploiting the achieved results;
meni, da je treba spodbuditi sodelovanje mladih znanstvenikov v projektnih skupinah v okviru dejavnosti skupnih raziskav industrije in znanstvenih organizacij; poziva, naj Komisija in države članice sprejmejo konkretne ukrepe za povečanje sodelovanja mladih raziskovalcev v okvirnih programih; poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi vmesni pregled sedmega okvirnega programa za spodbujanje zaposlovanja mladih znanstvenikov, in sicer s takšnim oblikovanjem pravil in načinov sodelovanja, da bo znaten del sredstev namenjen zaposlovanju mladih raziskovalcev;
Believes that the participation of young scientists in project teams in the context of collaborative research activities by industry and science organisation should be incentivated; calls for the Commission and the Member States to take specific measures designed to increase the participation of young researchers in the framework programmes; calls on the Commission to use the mid-term review of the Seventh Framework Programme to promote the employment of young scientists by designing the rules and modes of participation in such a way as to devote a substantial portion of funding for hiring young researchers;
pozdravlja vztrajen, čeravno zadržan, napredek proti bolj uravnoteženi udeležbi spolov v sedmem okvirnem programu, saj je raznolikost pomembna za ustvarjalnost in inovacije; poudarja, da raziskovalke običajno delajo v manjših, manj profiliranih raziskovalnih projektih in nalogah in da se ženske očitno srečujejo z velikim problemom „steklenega stropa“, zaradi česar je manj raziskovalk z višjim položajem, kar se kaže tudi tako, da je bilo za subvencije Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta za priznane raziskovalce izbranih le majhno število raziskovalk; se strinja, da je treba ukrepe za povečanje sodelovanja žensk okrepiti v vsem poteku projektov (zlasti glede prožnega delovnega časa, boljšega varstva otrok, zagotovljene socialne varnosti in dopusta za nego in varstvo otroka) ter da mora Komisija poživiti svoj pristop k spodbujanju znanstvenic in se usmeriti v spodbujanje držav članic, da premostijo razlike med spoloma; poudarja, da je treba cilj 40-odstotne udeležbe žensk v programskih in svetovalnih odborih premišljeno doseči; poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje medsektorski odbor za spremljanje in svetovanje glede zastopanosti raziskovalk in naj oblikuje akcijski načrt za vprašanja spolov, kakor je bilo priporočeno v naknadni oceni šestega okvirnega programa; poziva univerze in ustanove EU, naj že v zgodnjih fazah izobraževanja promovirajo znanost kot zanimivo področje za oba spola, tako da raziskovalke postavijo za zgled;
Welcomes the steady but timid progress towards a more balanced gender participation in FP7, since diversity is important for creativity and innovation; points out that female researchers tend to work on smaller, less profiled research projects and tasks and that a highly problematic ‘glass ceiling’ seems to exist for female researchers, leading to a decrease of the share of female researchers with seniority, as also indicated by the low number of female researchers selected for the ERC advanced investigator grant; agrees that measures to boost female participation should be reinforced throughout project lifecycles (with particular attention to flexible working hours, improved child-care facilities, social security provisions and parental leave) and that the Commission should reinvigorate its approach to promoting female scientists and should aim to galvanise Member States to address gender gaps; underlines that the 40% target for female participation in the Programme and Advisory Committees should be sensitively implemented; calls on the Commission to establish a cross-cutting committee to monitor and advice on the representation of female researchers and to develop a Gender Action Plan as recommended by the FP6 Ex Post Evaluation; calls on universities and EU Institutions to promote science as an interesting field for both sexes from early stages of education on, by promoting female researchers as role models;
poziva, naj se na regionalni ravni prizna pomembna vloga posredniških organizacij (kot so gospodarske zbornice, Evropska podjetniška mreža in regionalne inovacijske agencije) kot vezi med inovativnimi malimi in srednjimi podjetji v posameznih regijah in Komisijo;
Calls for recognition at regional level of the important role played by intermediary organisations (such as chambers of commerce, the Enterprise Europe Network and regional innovation agencies) as a link between innovative SMEs in each region and the Commission;
meni, da je treba programe odpreti za mednarodne partnerje; poudarja, da bi moralo biti osnovno načelo, da so vsi programi odprti za financiranje tudi tujih skupin (glede na posebne kompetence); zavrača zamisel, da bi bilo primerneje, da bi sodelujoče partnerje namesto raziskovalcev izbrala Komisija;
Believes that the programmes should be opened up to international partners; highlights that the basic principle should be that all programmes should be open for financing also of foreign groupings (given specific competencies); rejects the notion that the Commission would be better placed than researchers to determine the choice of cooperation partners;
meni, da bi moral sedmi okvirni program potrditi svoje prednostne naloge na področju mednarodnega sodelovanja; meni, da je treba ciljne države in področja za dejavnosti mednarodnega sodelovanja izbirati v posvetovanju z državami članicami, da se zagotovi dopolnjevanje teh dejavnosti z vsemi udeleženimi stranmi; vseeno ponovno potrjuje, da je treba pozornost nameniti sodelovanju z državami v razvoju;
Takes the view that FP7 should affirm its international cooperation priorities; is of the opinion that the choice of target countries and subjects for international cooperation actions must be made in consultation with the Member States in order to ensure complementarities of these actions with all parties involved; reaffirms, nevertheless, that attention must be given to the cooperation with developing countries;
meni, da je treba ohraniti vsaj tako raven financiranja sedmega okvirnega programa, ki bo verodostojna in potrebna, da bodo obravnavani veliki družbeni izzivi, in opominja, da so vlaganja v raziskave, razvoj in inovacije dolgoročna naložba in odločilni element za doseganje ciljev strategije EU 2020;
Takes the view that the level of financing of FP7, which is credible and necessary, must at least be maintained in order to meet the great societal challenges and recalls that investment in RDI is long-term investment and is key to achieving the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy;
meni, da bi morala biti poraba sedmega okvirnega programa, pa tudi splošna raziskovalna usmeritev, kolikor mogoče skladna s splošnimi političnimi cilji strategije EU 2020; meni, da znanstveni napredek na področju velikih izzivov zahteva srednje- do dolgoročno dodelitev instrumentov financiranja, ki podpirajo tako temeljne raziskave kot sodelovanje z industrijo in drugimi zunanjimi partnerji;
Believes that FP7 spending, as well as the overall research orientation, should be aligned as far as possible with the overarching policy objectives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy; believes that scientific progress on grand challenges requires medium to long-term commitment of funding instruments that support both fundamental research and collaboration with industry and other external partners;
poudarja, da ima raziskovalna infrastruktura odločilno vlogo ter da bi morala biti njen razvoj in financiranje (glede na seznam Evropskega strateškega foruma za raziskovalne infrastrukture)bolje usklajena in sofinancirana iz sedmega okvirnega programa, instrumentov EIB, strukturnih skladov ter nacionalnih in regionalnih politik; meni, da se je treba izogniti podvajanju raziskovalne infrastrukture v različnih državah članicah in da bi bilo treba okrepiti odprti dostop do raziskovalne infrastrukture na podlagi odličnosti; poziva k prizadevanjem za okrepljeno financiranje raziskovalnih infrastruktur v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa, zlasti tam, kjer obstajajo največje možnosti za dodano vrednost na evropski ravni;
Highlights the pivotal role of research infrastructures and stresses that their development and financing (based on the ESFRI-list and including the provision of laboratory equipment and instruments and their maintenance) should be better coordinated and co-financed between FP7, EIB instruments, the Structural Funds and national and regional policies; believes that duplication of research infrastructure in different Member States should be avoided and that an open and excellence-based access to research infrastructures should be enhanced; calls for efforts to boost the financing of research infrastructures within FP7, especially where there is the greatest scope for EU added value;
meni, da bi morali upravičenci za financiranje raziskovalne infrastrukture jasno obrazložiti svojo vlogo in uporabo opreme, laboratorijev in raziskovalnega ali tehničnega osebja; zato meni, da je treba oblikovati sistem za spremljanje in nadzor, ki bi preverjal skladnost sporazumov;
Considers that the beneficiaries of research infrastructure financing should clearly justify their role and their use of the equipment, laboratories and research or technical staff; to this end, believes that a monitoring and inspection system which verify compliance of the agreements should be created;
poziva države članice in EU, naj spoštujejo svoje finančne obveznosti, vključno z obveznostmi za dejavnosti na podlagi členov 185 in 187, v okviru mednarodnih sporazumov na področju raziskav;
Calls on the Member States and the EU to meet their financial commitments, including commitments for actions on the basis of Articles 185 and 187, under international research agreements;
poziva Komisijo, naj glede na to, da cilj glede financiranja raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja za leto 2020 znaša 3 % BDP, in glede na to, da so raziskave in inovacije edino zanesljivo sredstvo za dosego okrevanja gospodarstva v EU, razmisli o možnosti, da bi za države članice določila vmesno zavezujočo minimalno raven financiranja raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja, ki bi do leta 2015 znašala okoli 1 % BDP;
Calls on the Commission – in view of the objective of devoting 3% of GDP to a research and technological development by 2020 and recognising that research and innovation provide the only sure path to economic recovery in the EU – to consider the possibility of establishing a binding interim level of funding for research and technological development amounting to around 1% of GDP by 2015;
opaža krepitev inovacijske razsežnosti v prihodnjih delovnih programih; meni, da je treba zasnovati ukrepe, ki bodo omogočali čim boljši izkoristek in komercializacijo rezultatov raziskav, če naj raziskave in inovacije zares vplivajo na trg in družbo, in sicer tako, da bi obravnavali potencial komercializacije rezultatov raziskav v posebnih razpisih ali z ocenjevalnimi merili na posebnih področjih; poziva Komisijo, naj pred koncem sedmega okvirnega programa začne financirati predstavitvene in pilotne projekte ter projekte dokazovanja izvedljivosti in naj razmisli o sistemu financiranja, s katerim bi nagradila uspešne projekte in podprla njihov vstop na trg, s čimer bi dopolnila vnaprejšnje financiranje; ob tem tudi meni, da je potrebno tesno usklajevanje med sedmim okvirnim programom, strukturnimi skladi in programom za konkurenčnost in inovacije;
Notes a strengthening of the ‘innovation’ dimension in future work programmes; is of the opinion that - in order for research and innovation programmes to have a clear impact on the market and society - actions should be devised that enable the optimum exploitation and commercialisation of research results, such as addressing the potential of commercialisation of research results in specific calls or in evaluation criteria in particular areas; calls on the Commission to start financing demonstration, pilot and proof-of-concept projects before the end of FP7 and to consider a financing system to award successful projects and support their introduction on the market to complement the current up-front financing; believes, also in this respect, that close coordination is needed between FP7, the CIP and Structural Funds;
poudarja, da obstaja tveganje, da bomo zanemarili postopni prehod od temeljnih raziskav k uporabnim raziskavam in inovacijam, če bo struktura sedmega okvirnega programa razčlenjena na znanost zaradi znanosti, znanost za konkurenčnost in znanost za družbo; poudarja, da je treba preprečiti, da bi togost strukture preprečila uspešno izvajanje povezanih projektov;
Notes that if FP7 is structured in such a way as to distinguish between science for science's sake, science for competition, and science for society, there is a risk that the gradual transition from basic research to applied research and innovation will be left out of consideration; points to the need to prevent the successful implementation of integrated projects being hampered by structural rigidity;
meni, da bi sedmi in prihodnji osmi okvirni program morala več prispevati k razvoju industrije v Evropi, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo uporabne raziskave;
Believes that both FP7 and the future FP8 should make a greater contribution to the development of industry in Europe, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage applied research;
čeprav se zaveda, da je sedmi okvirni program prvenstveno namenjen raziskavam in tehnološkemu razvoju, poudarja, da je pomembno zasnovati politike in programe EU tako, da bodo sinergije v vsej vrednostni verigi raziskav in razvoja (od raziskav in izobraževanja prek inovacij do ustvarjanja delovnih mest) čim bolje izkoriščene; meni, da je to edini način za uresničitev ciljev glede Unije inovacij in za pospešitev preobražanja Evrope v družbo znanja; čeprav se veseli potekajočega razvijanja inovacijske preglednice, poziva k široki opredelitvi inovacij (ki bi zajela tudi netehnološke inovacije in inovacije na pobudo delavcev) in k razvoju učinkovitejših modelov, metod in orodij za merjenje in spodbujanje inovacij, tudi z javnimi razpisi, opredelitvijo standardov in finančnim inženiringom;
While recognising that FP7 is primarily aimed towards research and technological development, stresses the importance of devising EU policies and programmes in such a way that synergies within the entire R&D value chain (from research and education, through innovation, to job creation) are exploited to the fullest; believes that this is the only way to attain the goals set out in the ‘Innovation Union’ and to accelerate Europe's transformation into a knowledge-based society; in this regard, while welcoming the current development of an innovation scoreboard, calls for a broad definition of innovation (including non-technological and employee driven innovation) and for the development of more effective models, methodologies and tools to measure and boost innovation, including through public procurement, standards setting and financial engineering;