natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj v regulativni okvir o javnih naročilih uvede pojasnila, zlasti kar zadeva fazo izvajanja pogodbe (npr. o „bistveni spremembi“ veljavne pogodbe, o spremembah, ki se nanašajo na izvajalca, in o prekinitvi pogodb);
Calls on the Commission to introduce clarifications into the regulatory framework on public procurement, particularly in relation to the contract execution phase (e.g. on ‘substantial modification’ of a contract in force, on changes concerning the contractor and on the termination of contracts);
obžaluje, da imajo ponudniki samo omejene možnosti za odpravo izpuščenih podatkov v svojih ponudbah; zato poziva Komisijo, naj določi, katere izpuščene podatke lahko ponudniki popravijo in katere dodatne spremembe so dovoljene, ter razmisli o tem, kako zagotoviti preglednost in enako obravnavo;
Considers it regrettable that tenderers have only limited opportunities to rectify omissions in their bids; asks the Commission, therefore, to elaborate on what omissions may be rectified by bidders, what additional adjustments are allowed and how to guarantee transparency and equal treatment;
poudarja, da bi morali imeti naročniki možnost uporabiti prejšnje izkušnje s ponudnikom na podlagi uradnega poročila o oceni; priporoča določitev časovne omejitve za izključitve, kar bi moralo zagotavljati preglednost in objektivnost; izpostavlja potrebo po zakonskem pojasnilu v direktivah 2004/17/ES in 2004/18/ES, ki bi navajalo, da lahko ponudnik, ki se mu v predhodnem postopku javnega naročanja dokaže kršitev, ponovno postane zanesljiv, potem ko utemeljeno dokaže, da je opravil temeljit postopek samoočiščenja; meni, da bi tako pojasnilo spodbujalo protikorupcijske mehanizme, ker bi okrepilo spodbude za pospešitev odpravljanja koruptivnih praks in bi odpravilo resne pravne negotovosti;
Points out the contracting authorities should be able to benefit from previous experience with a tenderer on the basis of an official evaluation report; recommends setting a time limit for exclusions, which should guarantee transparency and objectivity; points out the need for legislative clarification in Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC stating that a bidder found guilty of a misconduct in a previous procurement procedure can regain reliability after having substantially proved that he has undergone an effective ‘self-cleaning’ procedure; considers that such a clarification would foster anti-corruption mechanisms by underpinning incentives to accelerate the elimination of corrupt practices, and would remove serious legal uncertainties;
obžaluje, da v zeleni knjigi niso navedeni pomanjkljivosti, pomanjkanje strokovnega znanja in slabo poznavanje javnih naročil ter neustreznost strategij javnega naročanja; poudarja pomen spodbujanje profesionalnega obnašanja in zagotavljanja objektivnosti pri naročnikih in operaterjih na trgu, zlasti s podpiranjem razvoja ciljno usmerjenih programov usposabljanja; priporoča vzpostavitev mreže središč odličnosti v sedanjih nacionalnih okvirih ter spodbujanje izmenjave informacij in zgledov dobre prakse med državami članicami; spodbuja tudi krovne organizacije, tako na nacionalni ravni kot na ravni EU, naj si delijo odgovornost, da dajo na razpolago ustrezne informacije ter olajšajo izmenjavo informacij med svojimi člani po vsej Evropi; poudarja pomen jasnih in razumljivih priročnikov tako za naročnike kot za ponudnike; obžaluje, da dokumenta „Kupujmo zeleno!
Regrets the Green Paper's failure to mention shortcomings, the lack of expertise and knowledge about procurement and the inadequacy of public procurement strategies; stresses the importance of promoting professionalism and guaranteeing objectivity on the part of both contracting authorities and market operators, particularly by supporting the development of targeted training programmes; recommends setting up a network of centres of excellence within the existing national frameworks, and promoting exchanges of information and good practices between Member States; also encourages umbrella organisations, at both national and EU level, to take shared responsibility for making relevant information available and to facilitate exchanges of information between their members throughout Europe; stresses the importance of clear and readily comprehensible manuals for both contracting authorities and tenderers; finds it regrettable that the documents ‘Buying green!
ugotavlja, da se le 1,4 % naročil odda podjetjem iz druge države članice; poudarja, da bi profesionalizacija in boljše usposabljanje naročnikov in ponudnikov spodbudila vseevropsko konkurenco in boljše izkoriščanje prednosti notranjega trga za javna naročila;
Observes that only 1.4% of contracts are awarded to undertakings from another Member State; stresses that professionalisation and better training of those who award contracts, and of tenderers, would foster EU-wide competition and exploit more fully the advantages of an internal market for public contracts;
poudarja, da je lahek dostop do javnih naročil za mala in srednja podjetja, ki so gonilna sila evropskega gospodarstva, bistven za ohranjanje zaposlenosti in za trajnostni razvoj, inovacije in rast; poudarja, da bodo poenostavitev postopkov in upravnih formalnosti, pa tudi oblikovanje strategij, prijaznih do malih in srednjih podjetij, ter izvajanje kodeksov dobre prakse olajšali dostop malih in srednjih podjetij do javnih naročil ter jim omogočili enakovrednejše in bolj pošteno sodelovanje; meni, da bi zagotavljanje poenostavljenega, enakega in pravičnega dostopa do javnih naročil za vse gospodarske subjekte privedlo do boljše uporabe denarja davkoplačevalcev; poudarja, da mala in srednja podjetja na splošno nimajo velike specializirane upravne zmogljivosti ter da je treba zato nujno zmanjšati upravno breme, s katerim se morajo soočati;
Emphasises that ready access to public procurement for SMEs, which are the driving force of the European economy, is crucial to maintaining employment and to sustainable development, innovation and growth; stresses that simplifying the procedures and administrative formalities, as well as creating SME-friendly strategies and implementing the code of good practice, will facilitate SMEs' access to public contracts and enable them to participate on a more equal and fairer footing; believes that providing simplified, equal and fair access to public procurement for all economic operators would result in a better use of taxpayers' money; points out that SMEs do not generally have significant specialised administrative capacity, and that it is thus essential to minimise the administrative burden imposed on them;
poudarja, da bi morala biti merila za izbor v zvezi s finančnim položajem, npr. glede prometa družbe, sorazmerna z naravo posameznega naročila; opozarja Komisijo in države članice, naj pri sprejemanju prožnih in uporabniku prijaznih instrumentov ne ustvarjajo novih ovir za mala in srednja podjetja ter naj prednostno upoštevajo njihove interese; poziva Komisijo, naj zaradi izboljšanja dostopa do postopkov javnih naročil in njihove preglednosti, zlasti v prid manjšim naročnikom in ponudnikom, posodobi spletno mesto „Tenders Electronic Daily“ (TED), da bo privlačnejše in prijaznejše do uporabnika, s tem pa tudi dostopnejše, obenem pa naj posebno pozornost nameni iskalnim merilom in kakovosti ter podrobnostim prevoda povzetka za vsako ponudbo; priporoča, da bi moralo spletno mesto TED uporabnikom ponuditi možnost opozarjanja, da bi bili obveščeni takoj po objavi novega razpisa;
Points out that selection criteria on financial standing, e.g. in relation to company turnover, should be proportional to the character of a given contract; warns the Commission and the Member States, when adopting flexible and user-friendly instruments, not to create any new barriers for SMEs and to take account of their interests as a matter of priority; asks the Commission, with the aim of improving access to public procurement procedures and improving their transparency, particularly for the benefit of smaller contracting authorities and tenderers, to modernise the Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) website to make it more accessible by improving its appeal and user-friendliness, with particular attention to search criteria and the quality and detail of the summary translations for each tender; recommends that TED should offer an alert service for users, to inform them when new tenders of interest are published;
poziva Komisijo, naj poveča ozaveščenost o pomembnosti razdeljevanja naročil po sklopih in razmisli o uporabi načela „uporabe ali razlage“, v skladu s katerim je treba pravila o zadevah, kot je razdelitev na sklope, uporabiti ali razložiti, zakaj niso bila uporabljena;
Asks the Commission to increase awareness of the importance of splitting contracts into lots, and to consider the implementation of the ‘apply or explain’ principle, whereby rules on matters such as division into lots must be complied with, or the failure to comply explained;
poudarja, da morajo naročniki bolj izkoristiti možnosti delitve javnih naročil na sklope, kar bi malim in srednjim podjetjem olajšalo udeležbo v javnih naročilih v kvalitativnem in kvantitativnim smislu ter izboljšalo raven konkurence; spodbuja mala in srednja podjetja, naj uporabljajo skupna naročila in združevanje pogodb, kar bi jim omogočalo ekonomijo obsega na področjih, kot sta logistika in prevoz; spodbuja javne organe, naj bodo prožni pri obravnavi teh sodobnih in prostovoljnih oblik ureditev; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči vse možnosti za spodbujanje začasnih ali stalnih skupin malih in srednjih podjetij ter malih struktur, da bi jim omogočila udeležbo v razpisih, ki niso razdeljeni na sklope, ne da bi morala delovati kot podizvajalci; poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s tem preuči zlasti sedanjo prakso oddajanja v podizvajanje malim in srednjim podjetjem – pogosto pod manj ugodnimi pogoji kakor so zagotovljeni glavnemu izvajalcu – delov naročil, ki niso razdeljena na posamezne sklope in so preobsežna, da bi lahko v postopku javnega naročila sodelovala mala in srednja podjetja;
Points out that contracting authorities should take greater advantage of the possibilities of dividing public contracts into lots, thus giving SMEs a better chance, in qualitative and quantitative terms, of participating in public procurement, and improving the level of competition; encourages SMEs to make use of joint procurement and contract pooling, which would allow them to make economies of scale in areas such as logistics and transport; encourages public authorities to be flexible when considering these modern and voluntary forms of arrangement; calls on the Commission to investigate all the possibilities for encouraging the temporary or permanent grouping of SMEs and small businesses in order to enable them to take part in invitations to tender that are not split into lots, without having to operate as subcontractors; asks the Commission, in this regard, to examine in particular the current practice of subcontracting to SMEs – often on conditions inferior to those applicable to the main contractor – of parts of contracts not split into lots, which are too big to enable SMEs to participate in the procurement procedure;
predlaga, naj se samostojne izjave ponudnikov dovolijo, če je to izvedljivo, in naj se originalni dokumenti zahtevajo samo od kandidatov na ožjem seznamu ali od uspešnega ponudnika, ob hkratnem izogibanju kakršnim koli zamudam ali izkrivljanjem trga zaradi nepravilnih izjav; poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja možnost „potnega lista za javna naročila“, ki bi ga sprejele vse države članice in bi dokazoval, da gospodarski subjekt izpolnjuje pogoje, zahtevane v zakonodaji EU o javnih naročilih; poudarja, da bi bil evropski sistem predhodnega ugotavljanja usposobljenosti koristen instrument, če bi bil preprost, poceni in lahko dostopen za mala in srednja podjetja;
Proposes that self-declarations be allowed where feasible, and that original documents be requested only from the shortlisted candidates or the successful tenderer, whilst avoiding any delays or market distortions caused by incorrect declarations; asks the Commission to promote the option of an ‘electronic procurement passport’ accepted by all Member States and proving that the economic operator fulfils the conditions required under EU legislation on public contracts; underlines the point that a European pre-qualification system should be a helpful instrument if it is kept simple, cheap and easily accessible for SMEs;
Peta naloga: zagotovitev premišljenih postopkov in preprečevanje nepoštenih ugodnosti
Fifth task: ensuring sound procedures and avoiding unfair advantages
poziva Komisijo, naj za preprečevanje korupcije na področju javnih naročil spodbuja učinkovitejše prakse glede poročanja, vključno z izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami o izključitvi nepoštenih ponudnikov; poziva Komisijo, naj v skladu s priporočili iz resolucije 1729(2010) parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope Resolucija 1729(2010) parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope o zaščiti informatorjev, sprejeta dne 29. aprila 2010.
Calls on the Commission, with a view to fighting corruption in public procurement, to promote more efficient reporting practices, including exchanges of information between Member States on the exclusion of unsound bidders; invites the Commission to provide for clear rules on protection of whistleblowers, following the recommendations in Resolution 1729(2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Resolution 1729(2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the protection of whistleblowers, text adopted 29 April 2010.
zagotovi jasna pravila za zaščito informatorjev, poveča preglednost pogodb, ki se financirajo iz sredstev EU, ter spodbuja izobraževalne ukrepe na institucionalni ravni in za širšo javnost;
, to enhance the transparency of contracts funded with EU money and to promote educational action both at institutional level and among the general public;
ugotavlja, da nekatere države članice že izvajajo učinkovite postopke dodeljevanja javnih naročil, ki zagotavljajo preglednost in ustrezno porabo davkoplačevalskega denarja; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči dobre prakse držav članic na tem področju in opredeli najučinkovitejša načela za javno naročanje v EU;
Notes that certain Member States already apply efficient public procurement award procedures that ensure transparency and the proper use of taxpayers' money; asks the Commission to study Member States' good practices in this field and identify the most effective principles for public procurement in the EU;
izpostavlja, da je eden od ciljev direktiv boj proti korupciji in favoriziranju; poudarja, da se države članice soočajo z različnimi izzivi na tem področju in da bi bolj izdelan evropski pristop tvegal, da bi spodkopal prizadevanja za racionalizacijo in poenostavitev predpisov ter namesto tega ustvaril še več birokracije; opozarja, da sta načeli preglednosti in konkurence ključni v boju proti korupciji; zahteva skupni pristop na področju samoočiščevalnih ukrepov za preprečevanje izkrivljanja na trgu in zagotovitev pravne varnosti za gospodarske subjekte in naročnike;
Points out that combating corruption and favouritism is one objective of the directives; underlines the fact that Member States face different challenges in this area and that a more elaborate European approach carries the risk of undermining efforts to streamline and simplify the rules, and of creating new bureaucracy; points out that the principles of transparency and competition are key in combating corruption; asks for a common approach on ‘self-cleaning’ measures to avoid market distortion and ensure legal certainty for economic operators and contracting authorities alike;
meni, da bi morala biti javna naročila pregledna in odprta za javni nadzor, saj zadevajo javna sredstva; naproša Komisijo za pojasnitev, da se zagotovi pravna varnost lokalnim in drugim javnim organom in da lahko ti svoje državljane obvestijo o svojih pogodbenih obveznostih;
Takes the view that, since public contracts concern public funds, they should be transparent and open to public scrutiny; asks the Commission for clarification with a view to ensuring legal certainty for local and other public authorities and enabling them to inform citizens of their contractual obligations;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni težave, povezane z izjemno nizkimi ponudbami in predlaga ustrezne rešitve; priporoča, naj naročniki v primeru prejetja neobičajno nizkih ponudb zagotovijo pravočasne in zadostne informacije drugim ponudnikom, da jim omogočijo oceno, ali obstajajo razlogi za začetek revizijskega postopka; poziva k večji skladnosti med skupno zunanjo trgovinsko politiko EU in praksami v državah članicah, ki sprejemajo izjemno nizke ponudbe;
Calls on the Commission to assess the problems associated with exceptionally low bids and to propose appropriate solutions; recommends that contracting authorities provide, in the event of abnormally low bids being received, for early and sufficient information to other bidders, in order to allow them to assess whether there is ground for initiating a review procedure; asks for greater consistency between the EU's common external trade policy and the practices in Member States where exceptionally low bids are accepted;
Šesta naloga: razširitev uporabe e-javnih naročil
Sixth task: expanding the use of e-procurement
pozdravlja zeleno knjigo Komisije o razširitvi uporabe e-javnih naročil; poudarja, da akcijski načrt na področju e-javnih naročil ni dosegel svojega cilja in da je potrebno obsežnejše politično vodstvo na vseh ravneh upravljanja – vključno z ravnijo EU –, da bi ohranili in pospešili prehod na e-javna naročila; želi zagotoviti, da bo vsaj 50 % postopkov javnih naročil, ki jih izvedejo institucije EU in države članice, opravljenih po elektronski poti v skladu z zavezo, ki so jo vlade držav članic leta 2005 sprejele na ministrski konferenci o e-upravi v Manchestru;
Welcomes the Commission Green Paper on expanding the use of e-procurement; points out that the e-procurement action plan has failed to achieve its goal and that more political leadership at all levels of government – including EU level – is needed in order to maintain and accelerate the transition to e-procurement; wants to ensure that at least 50% of both the EU institutions' and the Member States' public procurement operations are carried out electronically, in line with the commitment made by the Member State governments at the ministerial conference on e-government in Manchester in 2005;
poudarja, da mora odigrati Komisija edinstveno vlogo pri spodbujanju napredka na področju standardizacije in infrastrukture; denimo za e- podpise in datume je treba zaradi varnosti določiti skupno dogovorjeno obliko; poziva Komisijo, naj razvije zadevne skupne standarde; poudarja, da lahko obremenjujoče tehnične zahteve za preverjanje pristnosti ponudnikov delujejo kot ovire za izvajalce; v tej zvezi poudarja potrebo po razvoju standardiziranega sistema za e-podpis; poziva države članice, naj razvijejo storitev validacije za potrdila, ki jih pod njihovim nadzorom izdajo overitelji;
Underlines the fact that the Commission has a unique role to play in promoting progress on standardisation and infrastructure issues – e-signatures and time-stamps, for example, need a commonly agreed format for security purposes; asks the Commission to develop the common standards in question; emphasises that onerous technical requirements for bidder authentication can act as barriers to operators; stresses, in this context, the need to develop a standardised system for e-signature; calls on the Member States to make available a validation service for certificates issued by certification service providers under their supervision;
poudarja, da je treba za zagotovitev medobratovalnosti različnih sistemov in preprečevanje odvisnosti od ponudnika upoštevati odprte standarde in nevtralnost tehnologije; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi resnično medobratovalnost med različnimi platformami za e-javna naročila, ki že obstajajo v državah članicah, pri čemer je treba v večji meri uporabiti rezultate, pridobljene s pobudami EU, kot sta PEPPOL in e-CERTIS;
Underlines the fact that, to ensure interoperability of different systems and avoid vendor lock-in, open standards and technology neutrality must be observed; asks the Commission to assure real interoperability between the different e-procurement platforms that already exist in Member States, making more use of results obtained by EU initiatives such as PEPPOL and e-CERTIS;
poudarja, da je treba morebitne zakonodajne predloge za razširitev in poenostavitev uporabe e-javnih naročil vključiti v revizijo glavnih direktiv o javnih naročilih ter da morajo biti skladni s področjem uporabe in splošnimi predpisi o javnih naročilih, kot so obveznosti, povezane s pragi;
Points out that any legislative proposals to expand and simplify the use of e-procurement should be integrated into the review of the main public procurement directives and should be in line with the scope and with general public procurement rules such as obligations linked to thresholds;
poudarja, da lahko e-javna naročila spodbudijo poenostavitev celotnega procesa javnih naročil in ustvarijo učinkovitost, ki bi povzročila bistveno zmanjšanje stroškov in prihranek časa tako za podjetja kot za javno upravo ter povečala preglednost in dostopnost; opozarja, da zlasti elektronsko oddajanje naročil odpira nove možnosti za posodobitev uprave na področju javnih naročil; ponavlja dejstvo, da bi morala biti e-naročila cenejša, hitrejša in preglednejša kakor konvencionalni postopki javnega naročanja; kljub temu meni, da so izboljšanja še vedno mogoča in da bi morali narediti več glede dostopa do zanesljivih, primerljivih in objektivnih informacij in statističnih podatkov; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo čezmejno uporabo e-javnih naročil;
Underlines the point that e-procurement can drive simplification of the entire procurement process, introducing efficiencies that will lead to significant cost and time savings for both businesses and public administrations, and increasing transparency and accessibility; notes that the electronic awarding of contracts, in particular, opens up new avenues for modernising administration in the field of public contracts; reiterates that e-procurement should be less costly, more expedient and more transparent than conventional public procurement procedures; believes, however, that there is still room for improvement and that more should be done in terms of access to reliable, comparable and objective information and statistical data; calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage cross-border use of e-procurement;
poudarja, da zakonodaja ni edini ključni dejavnik za spodbujanje sprememb; zato poziva Komisijo, naj razišče nove načine za izmenjavo izkušenj, delitev najboljših praks ter prenos znanja prek meja med lokalnimi in regionalnimi akterji; poudarja, da je nujno nadalje okrepiti zmogljivosti in razumevanje osebja, ki se ukvarja z e-javnimi naročili, ter prek nacionalnih in/ali evropskih spodbud zagotoviti enake pogoje za mala, srednja in velika podjetja, s čimer bi malim in srednjim podjetjem pomagali pri gradnji znanja in zmogljivosti; pozdravlja instrument za povezovanje Evrope kot nov instrument, s katerim bi okrepili čezmejna e-javna naročila in omogočili razvoj enotnega digitalnega trga;
Points out that legislation is not the only key to promoting change; asks the Commission, therefore, to explore new ways to exchange experiences, share best practices and transfer knowledge across borders among local and regional actors; highlights the strong need to further enhance the capacity and understanding of staff dealing with e-procurement and – through national and/or EU incentives to secure a ‘level playing field’ between SMEs and large enterprises – to assist SMEs in building their knowledge and capacity; welcomes the Connecting Europe Facility as a new instrument to boost cross border e-procurement, thus allowing the digital single market to develop;
pozdravlja najavo v akcijskem načrtu Komisije za e-upravo 2011–2015, da bo platformo
Welcomes the announcement in the Commission's ‘eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015’ that the