natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Svet omenjene dokumente predložil Parlamentu in da je predsedstvo Sveta sodelovalo v razpravi o razrešnici za leto 2009 na plenarnem zasedanju; vseeno spominja, da je bila podelitev razrešnice odložena, saj Parlament ni prejel odgovorov na številna nepojasnjena vprašanja v zvezi z razrešnico Svetu za leto 2009, ki so se pojavila že v zgodnji fazi, predvsem:
Welcomes the fact that the Council submitted the abovementioned documents to Parliament and that the Council Presidency participated in Plenary at the 2009 discharge debate; recalls, however, that the discharge was postponed as Parliament had not received any responses to a number of pending issues concerning the 2009 Council discharge which were raised at an earlier stage, notably:
uprava Sveta se ni odzvala na povabila parlamentarnega odbora, odgovornega za podelitev razrešnice, ki je želel razpravljati o zadevah v zvezi z izvrševanjem proračuna Sveta za leto 2009, in tako Parlament še vedno čaka na potrditev generalnega sekretarja Sveta, da se je pripravljen osebno udeležiti seje odbora, odgovornega za razrešnico, in odgovarjati na vprašanja njegovih članov;
the Council administration has not accepted any invitation to meet Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure in order to discuss matters concerning the Council budget execution for 2009 and consequently Parliament still needs confirmation of the willingness of the Secretary-General of the Council to appear in person at a meeting of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure and to answer committee members' questions;
Parlament od uprave Sveta še vedno ni prejel informacij in dokumentov, ki jih je zahteval v resoluciji 10. maja 2011;
Parliament has not received from the Council administration the information and documents requested in its resolution of 10 May 2011;
Pravica Parlamenta do podelitve razrešnice
The right of Parliament to grant discharge
je seznanjen s pismom predsedstva Sveta predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. junija 2011, v katerem Svet trdi, „da je bila razrešnica v skladu z zakonodajo EU z glasovanjem Parlamenta 10. maja 2011 v skladu s členom 319 PDEU podana za vse obračune Unije za leto 2009, tudi za obračune Sveta“;
Takes note of the letter of 2 June 2011 from the Council Presidency to the President of the European Parliament in which the Council considers ‘that all the Union accounts for 2009, including its own, have been discharged in accordance with EU law by vote of the Parliament on 10th May 2011, in accordance with Article 319 of the TFEU’;
poudarja, da je treba pravico Parlamenta do podelitve razrešnice v skladu s skupnim branjem členov 316, 317 in 319 PDEU razlagati glede na njen kontekst in namen, namreč da je izvrševanje celotnega proračuna Evropske unije, brez izjeme, predmet parlamentarnega nadzora in pregleda in da Parlament razrešnico podeli avtonomno, ne samo za del proračuna, ki ga izvršuje Komisija, temveč tudi za proračunske oddelke, ki jih izvršujejo druge institucije, kot navaja člen 1 finančne uredbe;
Underlines the right of Parliament to grant discharge, pursuant to a combined reading of Articles 316, 317 and Article 319 of the TFEU, that should be interpreted in the light of their context and purpose, which is to submit the implementation of the entire budget of the European Union to parliamentary control and scrutiny without exception, and to grant discharge autonomously not only in respect of the section of the budget implemented by the Commission, but also in respect of the sections of the budget implemented by the other institutions, as referred to in Article 1 of the Financial Regulation;
meni, da člen 319 PDEU ter člen 50 finančne uredbe od drugih institucij zahtevata, naj pri izvrševanju proračuna spoštujejo enaka pravila in pogoje kot Komisija; meni, da je zaradi tega za izvrševanje proračuna odgovorna tudi vsaka posamezna institucija in ne samo Komisija;
Is of the opinion that Article 319 of the TFEU and Article 50 of the Financial Regulation require the other institutions to respect the same rules and conditions as the Commission in the execution of its budget; considers that, as a consequence, the responsibility for the implementation of each budget lies with each respective institution and not with the Commission alone;
poudarja, da Parlament ne glede na možne različne pravne razlage samostojnega zaključka poslovnih knjig meni, da je treba za vse namene opraviti politično oceno finančnega poslovodenja institucije med letom, ki se obravnava, s čimer bo upoštevano institucionalno ravnovesje, v skladu s katerim je Parlament odgovoren za zagotavljanje demokratične odgovornosti do državljanov Unije;
Underlines that, notwithstanding possible different legal interpretations of the autonomous closure of accounts, Parliament is of the opinion that for all intents and purposes, political assessment of the institution's financial management during the year under examination should be completed, thereby maintaining the current institutional equilibrium, in accordance with which Parliament is responsible for the assurance of democratic accountability towards Union citizens;
meni, da sta omenjeni pravni argument, pa tudi uveljavljena praksa sprejemanja ločenih sklepov o podelitvi razrešnice za institucije in organe Evropske unije v podporo takšnemu razumevanju, povrhu tega pa morajo biti sklepi o razrešnicah sprejeti ločeno iz operativnih razlogov, da se prepreči prekinitve in motnje delovanja Unije;
Considers that the abovementioned legal reasoning as well as the established practice of adopting individual decisions on discharge in respect of each Union institution and body support this interpretation and, in addition, the decisions on discharge need to be adopted separately for operational reasons in order to avoid discontinuity and disruption of Union action;
meni, da je pravilna razlaga člena 147 finančne uredbe in člena 265 PDEU ta, da je ob nesprejetju ustreznih ukrepov na podlagi ugotovitev, ki spremljajo Parlamentov sklep o razrešnici, Parlament v tem primeru upravičen vložiti tožbo zaradi neukrepanja;
Is of the opinion that the proper interpretation of Article 147 of the Financial Regulation and Article 265 of the TFEU is that failure to take the appropriate steps to act on the observations accompanying Parliament's discharge decision, entitles Parliament to bring an action for failure to act;
ugotavlja, da naj bi bil glede na izjavo predsedstva Sveta na seji Odbora za proračunski nadzor 21. junija 2011 „memorandum o soglasju“, ki ga je COREPER sprejel 2. marca 2011, osnova za odnose med Parlamentom in Svetom, kar zadeva medsebojno razrešnico za proračuna teh institucij; ugotavlja še, da omenjeni memorandum zahteva popolno vzajemnost med Parlamentom in Svetom, kar zadeva predložitev dokumentov, odgovarjanje na vprašanja in dvostransko srečanje, ki ga vsako leto organizirajo predstavniki Sveta in parlamentarnega odbora, odgovornega za podelitev razrešnice, pa tudi generalna sekretariata obeh institucij;
Notes that, according to the Council Presidency's declaration at the meeting of the Committee on Budgetary Control of 21 June 2011, the ‘memorandum of understanding’ adopted by the COREPER on 2 March 2011 is intended to form the basis of relations between Parliament and the Council regarding the discharge of their respective budgets; further notes that this memorandum requires full reciprocity between Parliament and the Council in respect of submission of documents, answers to questions and a bilateral meeting to be organised every year between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, as well as Secretaries-General of both institutions;
v celoti spoštuje vlogo Sveta kot organa za priporočila v vsakoletnem postopku razrešnice, kot določa člen 319 PDEU, vendar se ne bi strinjal z njim, če bi ta trdil, da je njegova vloga pri podelitvi razrešnice enaka vlogi Parlamenta;
Fully respects the Council's role as recommending authority in the annual discharge procedure, provided for in Article 319 of the TFEU; would disagree with the Council, however, should it consider itself to be in an identical position to Parliament as regards the granting of discharge;
poudarja, da je treba razliko med vlogama Parlamenta in Sveta v postopku razrešnice ohraniti in da bi morala biti uprava Sveta (njegov generalni sekretariat) – tako kot uprave drugih institucij Unije, vključno s Parlamentom – predmet nadzora Računskega sodišča in da bi morala biti polno odgovorna državljanom Unije za izvrševanje svojega proračuna, kar pa zagotavlja prav postopek razrešnice, kot določa PDEU;
Reiterates that a distinction must be maintained in respect of the different roles of Parliament and the Council in the discharge procedure and that the Council administration (its General Secretariat), as with the other administrations of Union institutions, including the Parliament administration itself, should be subject to the control of the Court of Auditors and should be fully accountable to Union citizens for the implementation of their respective budgets, by means of the discharge procedure as set out in the TFEU;
13 ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče nadzor nad institucijami izvaja ločeno od nadzora Komisije, in poudarja, da naj bi bil končni element verige odgovornosti demokratični nadzor, ki ga Parlament izvaja s podelitvijo razrešnice; 14.
13 Notes that the Court of Auditors carries out its controls on these institutions separately from the Commission controls and underlines that the final element of the accountability chain should be the democratic control through the discharge granted by Parliament; 14.
opominja, da je treba odhodke Sveta nadzirati na enak način kot odhodke drugih institucij, osnovni elementi takšnega nadzora pa bi morali biti naslednji:
Recalls that the expenditure of the Council must be scrutinised in the same way as that of the other institutions, and the fundamental elements of such scrutiny should be:
kot je navedel v svoji resoluciji z dne 16. junija 2010 UL L 252, 25.9.2010, str.
as indicated in its resolution of 16 June 2010 OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p.
o postopku podelitve razrešnice Svetu za leto 2008, bi morala razrešnica temeljiti na naslednjih dokumentih v pisni obliki, ki jih predložijo vse institucije:
concerning the 2008 Council discharge procedure, that the discharge should be based on the following written documents submitted by all institutions:
računovodski izkazi v zvezi z izvrševanjem proračuna za predhodno proračunsko leto,
accounts of the preceding financial year relating to the implementation of their budgets,
izkaz stanja sredstev in obveznosti,
a financial statement of their assets and liabilities,
letno poročilo o dejavnostih v zvezi s proračunskim in finančnim poslovodenjem,
the Annual Activity Report on their budget and financial management,
letno poročilo notranjega revizorja.
the annual report of their internal auditor.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2000/25/ES glede uporabe stopenj emisij za ozkokolotečne traktorje ( KOM(2011)0001 – C7-0018/2011 – 2011/0002(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 October 2011 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/25/EC as regards the application of emission stages for narrow-track tractors ( COM(2011)0001 – C7-0018/2011 – 2011/0002(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2011)0001 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2011)0001 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0018/2011 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0018/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju zaveze predstavnika Sveta v pismu z dne 21. septembra 2011, da bo odobril stališče Evropskega parlamenta, v skladu s členom 294(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 21 September 2011 to approve Parliament's position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0282/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0282/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 114 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on Functioning of European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2011.
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure Position of the European Parliament of 25 October 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of … .
Direktiva 2000/25/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. maja 2000 o ukrepih, ki jih je treba sprejeti proti emisijam plinastih in trdnih onesnaževal iz motorjev, namenjenih za pogon kmetijskih ali gozdarskih traktorjev UL L 173, 12.7.2000, str.
Directive 2000/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2000 on action to be taken against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants by engines intended to power agricultural or forestry tractors OJ L 173, 12.7.2000, p.
, ureja emisije izpušnih plinov iz motorjev, vgrajenih v kmetijske in gozdarske traktorje zaradi boljšega varstva človekovega zdravja in okolja.
regulates exhaust emissions from engines installed in agricultural and forestry tractors with a view to further safeguarding human health and the environment.
Direktiva 2000/25/ES je določala, da se mejne vrednosti emisij, ki so v letu 2010 veljale za homologacijo večine motorjev na kompresijski vžig, stopnje III A, postopoma nadomestijo s strožjimi mejnimi vrednostmi stopnje III B, in sicer od 1. januarja 2010 za homologacijo navedenih motorjev in od 1. januarja 2011 za dajanje na trg.
Directive 2000/25/EC provided that the emission limits applicable in 2010 for type approval of the majority of compression ignition engines, referred to as Stage III A, were to be replaced by the more stringent Stage III B limits, entering into force progressively as from 1 January 2010 as regards the type-approval, and from 1 January 2011 with regard to the placing on the market, for those engines.
Mejne vrednosti emisij stopnje IV, ki so strožje od stopnje III B, bodo začele postopoma veljati od 1. januarja 2013 za homologacijo navedenih motorjev in od 1. januarja 2014 za dajanje na trg.
Stage IV, providing for emission limits more stringent than Stage III B, will enter into force progressively as from 1 January 2013 as regards the type- approval for those engines and from 1 January 2014 with regard to the placing on the market.
Člen 2(b) Direktive 2004/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o spremembi Direktive 97/68/ES o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o ukrepih proti plinastim in trdnim onesnaževalom iz motorjev z notranjim zgorevanjem, namenjenih za vgradnjo v premične stroje in naprave UL L 146, 30.4.2004, str.
Article 2(b) of Directive 2004/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery OJ L 146, 30.4.2004, p.
, določa, da Komisija preuči razpoložljivo tehnologijo, vključno s pripadajočimi stroški in koristmi, z namenom potrditi mejne vrednosti stopenj III B in IV ter oceniti možne potrebe po dodatni prilagodljivosti, izjemah ali kasnejših datumih uvajanja za določene tipe opreme ali motorjev in ob upoštevanju motorjev, ki so vgrajeni v necestne premične stroje in naprave sezonske uporabnosti.
, provides that the Commission is to consider the available technology, including the cost/benefits, with a view to confirming stage III B and IV limit values and evaluating the possible need for additional flexibilities, exemptions or later introduction dates for certain types of equipment or engines and taking into account engines installed in non-road mobile machinery used in seasonal applications.
Poleg tega člen 4(8) Direktive 2000/25/ES določa revizijo postopka z namenom upoštevati posebnosti traktorjev kategorij T2, T4.1 in C2.
Moreover, Article 4(8) of Directive 2000/25/EC provides for a review clause in order to take into account the specificities of tractors of categories T2, T4.1 and C2.
Direktiva 97/68/ES je bila večkrat tehnično preučena.
Directive 97/68/EC was the subject of several technical studies.
Na podlagi teh tehničnih študij, opravljenih v letih 2007, 2009 in 2010, ki jih je Komisija potrdila v svoji presoji vpliva, je bilo ugotovljeno, da za traktorje kategorij T2, T4.1 in C2 ni tehnično izvedljivo, da bi izpolnjevali zahteve stopenj III B in IV do datumov iz navedene direktive.
As a result of those technical studies carried out in 2007, 2009 and 2010 and confirmed by the impact assessment carried out by the Commission, it was established that it is not technically feasible for tractors of categories T2, T4.1 and C2 to meet the requirements of stages III B and IV by the dates set out in that Directive.
Da se prepreči, da bi zakonodaja Unije predpisovala tehnične zahteve, ki jih še ni mogoče izpolnjevati, ter da se prepreči situacija, v kateri traktorji kategorij T2, T4.1 in C2 ne morejo več biti homologirani in dani na trg ali v obratovanje, je treba zagotoviti prehodno obdobje treh let, v katerem se lahko traktorje kategorij T2, T4.1. in C2 še vedno homologira in da na trg ali v obratovanje.
In order to prevent Union legislation from prescribing technical requirements which cannot be met yet and in order to prevent a situation in which tractors of categories T2, T4.1 and C2 can no longer be type-approved and placed on the market or put into service, it is necessary to provide for a transitional period of three years, during which tractors of categories T2, T4.1 and C2 may still be type-approved and placed on the market or put into service.
Komisija bi morala vsako leto poročati Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o napredku v razvoju tehničnih rešitev za tehnologijo, skladno s stopnjo IV.
The Commission should report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on progress in the development of technical solutions for Stage IV-compliant technology.
Direktivo 2000/25/ES bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Directive 2000/25/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO DIREKTIVO: Člen 1 Spremembe Direktive 2000/25/ES
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 Amendments to Directive 2000/25/EC
V členu 4 Direktive 2000/25/ES se doda naslednji odstavek:
In Article 4 of Directive 2000/25/EC, the following paragraph is added:
Z odstopanjem se datumi iz točk (d) in (e) drugega odstavka in iz tretjega odstavka za traktorje kategorij T2, T4.1 in C2, kot so v tem zaporedju opredeljene v drugi alinei točke A.1 poglavja A, v točki 1.1. dela I Dodatka 1 poglavja B in v točki A.2 poglavja A Priloge II k Direktivi 2003/37/ES, ki so opremljeni z motorji kategorij od L do R, preložijo za tri leta.
By way of derogation, the dates set out in points (d) and (e) of paragraph 2 and in paragraph 3 shall, for tractors of categories T2, T4.1 and C2, as defined respectively in the second indent of point A.1 of Chapter A, in point 1.1 of Part I of Appendix 1 of Chapter B, and in point A.2 of Chapter A of Annex II to Directive 2003/37/EC, and equipped with engines of categories L to R, be postponed for three years.
Do teh datumov se zahteve stopenj III A v tej direktivi še naprej uporabljajo.
Until such dates, the requirements of Stage III A in this Directive shall continue to apply.
Razpoložljivost združljive tehnologije
Availability of compatible technology
Komisija do 31. decembra 2014 preuči, katera tehnologija, ki je zmožna izpolnjevati zahteve stopnje IV in je skladna s potrebami kategorij T2, T4.1 in C2, je na voljo, in, kadar je primerno, poda predloge Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The Commission shall, by 31 December 2014, consider what technology is available that is capable of meeting Stage IV requirements and that is compatible with the needs of categories T2, T4.1 and C2, and submit, where appropriate, proposals to the European Parliament and the Council.
Države članice sprejmejo in objavijo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, najpozneje do … * UL: prosimo, vstavite datum:
Member States shall adopt and publish, by ... * OJ:
Besedila teh ukrepov nemudoma sporočijo Komisiji.
They shall forthwith communicate to the Commission the text of those measures.
Države članice se v sprejetih ukrepih sklicujejo na to direktivo ali pa sklic nanjo navedejo ob njihovi uradni objavi.
When Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
sporočijo Komisiji besedila temeljnih določb predpisov nacionalne zakonodaje, sprejetih na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Člen 4 Začetek veljavnosti
Article 4 Entry into force
Člen 5 Naslovniki
Article 5 Adressees
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 97/68/ES glede določb za motorje, dane na trg v okviru sistema prožnosti ( KOM(2010)0362 – C7-0171/2010 – 2010/0195(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 October 2011 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 97/68/EC as regards the provisions for engines placed on the market under the flexibility scheme ( COM(2010)0362 – C7-0171/2010 – 2010/0195(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0362 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0362 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0171/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0171/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 16. septembra 2010 UL C 48, 15.2.2011, str.
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16 September 2010 OJ C 48, 15.2.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ter mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7-0080/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0080/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora UL C 48, 15.2.2011, str.
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee OJ C 48, 15.2.2011, p.
Direktiva 97/68/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 1997 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o ukrepih proti plinastim in trdnim onesnaževalom iz motorjev z notranjim zgorevanjem, namenjenih za vgradnjo v necestno mobilno mehanizacijo UL L 59, 27.2.1998, str.
Directive 97/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1997 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery OJ L 59, 27.2.1998, p.
in mejne vrednosti emisij
and emission limits of air pollutants