natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker naj bi proizvodnja energije iz trdne biomase in bioloških odpadkov po napovedih do leta 2020 predstavljala 58 % obnovljivih virov energije EU, delež biomase gozdnega izvora pa naj bi relativno gledano upadel, vendar je vse več povpraševanja po lesu kot viru energije; ker je torej potrebna previdnost, da se prepreči nezakonita sečnja in intenziviranje gozdarskih praks, ki bi utegnile v nekaterih državah članicah povečati razmerje med sečnjo in prirastom za več kot 100 %, kar bi imelo nasprotni učinek za cilje glede podnebnih sprememb in biotske raznovrstnosti; ker bi energija iz biomase morala biti manj odvisna od gozdne biomase,
whereas energy generation from solid biomass and biowaste is projected to be 58% of EU renewables by 2020 and, while forestry biomass share is expected to decrease in relative terms, there is a steadily increasing demand for timber as a source of energy; whereas vigilance is therefore necessary to prevent illegal logging and the intensification of forestry practices that could increase the ratio of felling to increment to over 100% in some Member States, counteracting climate-change and biodiversity objectives; whereas energy from biomass should be less dependent on forest biomass,
ker je treba varstvo gozdov in njihovih funkcij vključiti v vse politike EU, ki zadevajo gozdove,
whereas forest protection and protection of forests’ functions should be mainstreamed in all EU policies affecting forests,
ker so gozdovi živi in razvijajoči se ekosistemi, ki pogosto segajo prek državnih meja in jih lahko različno razvrstimo, na primer glede na bioklimatsko območje ali tip gozda, in ker je Evropska agencija za okolje (EEA) za usmerjanje odločanja v politikah EU razvila posebno nomenklaturo gozdov; ker bi bilo treba v politikah EU, ki zadevajo gozdove, upoštevati najnovejša znanstvena dognanja z vseh področij, na primer o celinskem razvodju, in pri teh politikah bi bilo treba preprečiti, da bi postale preširoke in premalo uporabne,
whereas forests constitute live and evolutionary ecosystems, often cutting across state borders, which may be classified in different ways such as by bioclimatic zones or forest types, and whereas, in order to guide EU policy decisions, the EEA has developed a specific forest nomenclature; whereas the latest scientific achievements from all fields, such as the ’continental divide’, should be taken into account in EU policies affecting forests, and those policies should avoid the risk of being too broad to be useful,
ker se različni tipi gozdov in gozdarski sektor zaradi podnebnih sprememb lahko soočijo z različnimi nepredvidljivimi biotskimi in abiotskimi nevarnostmi, na primer škodljivci, nevihtami, sušo in požari, zaradi česar je osnova prizadevanj za njihovo zaščito njihova odpornost,
whereas different forest types and the forestry sector face different and unpredictable biotic and abiotic threats from climate change, such as pests, storms, drought and fire, rendering forest resilience the cornerstone of protection efforts,
ker so zanesljive in primerljive informacije o stanju gozdov EU ter posledicah podnebnih sprememb in proizvodnih vzorcev v gozdovih pomemben predpogoj za politiko in načrtovanje, tudi v zvezi s prispevkom gozdov k blažitvi podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanju nanje,
whereas solid and comparable information on the state of EU forests and the consequences of climate change and production patterns in forests is an important precondition for policy and planning, including on forests’ contribution to climate-change mitigation and adaptation,
ker naravni in podtaknjeni gozdni požari, slednji pogosto iz prikritih vzgibov, vsako leto uničijo več kot 400.000 hektarov gozdov, ne samo v Sredozemlju, pri čemer nastane velika škoda pri človeških življenjih, nepremičninah, zaposlovanju, biotski raznovrstnosti in varovalni funkciji gozdov; ker je regeneracija po požaru v vseh gozdovih še posebej težavna, pri omrežju Natura 2000 pa onemogoči uresničevanje njegovih ciljev,
whereas wildfires and arson, often carried out for ulterior motives, destroy more than 400 000 hectares of forest per year, especially but not exclusively in the Mediterranean region, at great cost to human life, property, employment, biodiversity and the protective functions of forests; whereas regeneration after fire is especially difficult for all forests, and in the case of the NATURA 2000 network, hinders attainment of the network's objectives,
ker omenjena bela knjiga o prilagajanju na podnebne spremembe zajema gozdove kot eno od ključnih področij ukrepanja, pri čemer je poudarjeno, da bi bilo treba gozdarsko strategijo EU posodobiti, da bi zajela tudi vidike, povezane s spreminjanjem podnebja,
whereas the above-mentioned White Paper on adapting to climate change includes forests as one of the key areas of action, stressing that the EU forestry strategy should be updated to include aspects linked to climate change,
ker je samo 5 %, evropskih gozdov prvinskega pragozda, v katerega človek še ni posegal; ker majhen delež tovrstnih gozdov skupaj z vse večjo razdrobljenostjo preostalih vrst gozdov povečuje dovzetnost gozdov za podnebne nevarnosti, to pa delno pojasnjuje nepretrgano slabo stanje ohranjenosti številnih ogroženih evropskih gozdnih vrst,
whereas only 5% of the European forest area is old-growth, primary and undisturbed by human activity; whereas the small share of this type of forest, in combination with increased fragmentation of the remaining stands of all forest types, increases the susceptibility of forests to climate threats, and partially explains the continuing poor conservation status of many forest species of European concern,
ker bi krepitev varovalnih funkcij gozdov morala biti del strategij EU in držav članic za civilno zaščito, še zlasti ob spoprijemanju z ekstremnimi pojavi, povezanimi s podnebjem, kot so požari in poplave,
whereas enhancement of forests’ protective functions should form part of the EU and Member States’ strategies for civil protection, especially in the face of climate-related extreme phenomena such as fires and floods,
ker je poročilo pobude TEEB predstavilo prepričljive argumente glede stroškov in koristi javnih naložb v ekosistemsko naravnane pristope za prilagajanje na podnebne spremembe in njihovo blažitev, predvsem v zvezi z zeleno infrastrukturo, na primer obnavljanjem in ohranjanjem gozdov,
whereas the TEEB report has presented a compelling cost-benefit case for public investment in ecosystem-based approaches to climate-change adaptation and mitigation, particularly with regard to green infrastructure, such as restoring and conserving forests,
ker je treba upoštevati in podpirati različne nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne sisteme upravljanja gozdov, da se izboljša njihova zmožnost prilagajanja,
whereas diverse national, regional and local forest management systems must be respected as well as assisted, in order to enhance their adaptive capacity,
ker zmogljivost evropskih gozdov, da so učinkoviti ponori ogljikovega dioksida, amoniaka in dušikovih oksidov, še vedno ni dovolj raziskana, les iz trajnostno upravljanih gozdov pa bi utegnil imeti dodatne trajnostne koristi, saj se ga da reciklirati in je z ogljikom bogat nadomestek za energetsko intenzivne materiale – kovinske zlitine, plastiko in beton, ki se jih veliko uporablja v gradbeništvu in drugih panogah,
whereas the capacity of European forests to act as effective sinks for CO2, NH3 and NOX is still underexploited, and wood originating from sustainably managed forests may have sustained mitigation benefits, serving as a recyclable, carbon-rich substitute for energy intensive materials such as metal alloys, plastics and concrete that are widely used in construction and other industries,
ker se bo po podatkih, ki jih je zbrala Komisija, južna Evropa v poletnih mesecih segrevala dvakrat hitreje kot ostala Evropa, poletne padavine na jugu pa se bodo vsako desetletje zmanjšale za 5 %,
whereas, according to data gathered by the Commission, summer warm-up in Southern Europe will be twice as fast as in the rest of Europe and summer precipitation in the South will decrease by 5% per decade,
ker ima akcijski načrt EU za gozdove štiri cilje: izboljšanje dolgoročne konkurenčnosti, varstvo okolja, prispevek h kakovosti življenja in spodbujanje usklajevanja, in ker je bil predvsem pri izpolnjevanju prvega cilja dosežen precejšen napredek,
whereas the EU FAP has four goals: improving long-term competitiveness, protecting the environment, contributing to quality of life and fostering coordination, and whereas significant progress has been made mainly in achieving the first goal,
ker je bilo v procesu Forest Europe že doseženo prostovoljno evropsko soglasje o trajnostnem upravljanju gozdov; ker obstoječi okvir trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov ni splošno priznan in se ne izvaja dosledno,
whereas the Forest Europe process has achieved a voluntary European consensus on Sustainable Forest Management; whereas the existing context for SFM lacks full recognition and consistent implementation;
ker so bile kot del procesa Forest Europe opravljene obsežne priprave na pogajanja o pravno zavezujočem instrumentu in ker je na prihodnji konferenci v Oslu junija 2011 moč pričakovati odločitve glede tega instrumenta,
whereas, as part of the Forest Europe process, comprehensive preparations have been made for negotiations on a legally binding instrument, and whereas decisions on such an instrument can be expected at the next conference in Oslo in June 2011,
ker sta uredbi o preprečevanju gozdnih požarov Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2158/92 z dne 23. julija 1992 o varstvu gozdov Skupnosti pred požari (UL L 217, 31.7.1991, str.
whereas the Forest Fire Prevention Council Regulation (EEC) No 2158/92 of 23 July 1992 on protection of the Community's forests against fire, (OJ L 217, 31.7.1992, p.
in o sistemu Forest Focus Uredba (ES) št. 2152/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2003 o spremljanju gozdov in medsebojnih okoljskih vplivih v Skupnosti (Forest Focus), (UL L 324, 11.12.2003, str.
and Forest Focus Regulations Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 concerning monitoring of forests and environmental interactions in the Community (Forest Focus), (OJ L 324, 11.12.2003, p.
ker bi morala biti genetska selekcija usmerjena k izboljšanju prilagodljivosti gozdnega ekosistema,
whereas genetic selection should seek, and be geared to improving, the adaptability of the forest ecosystem,
ker je potrebnih več informacij o vplivu gozdov na vremenske vzorce na evropski ravni,
whereas more information is needed about the influence of forests on weather patterns at European level,
ker je zgoraj omenjeno poročilo Komisiji iz leta 2009 o možnostih politike EU za zaščito evropskih gozdov pred škodljivimi vplivi opredelilo in preučilo štiri možnosti politike, ki zajemajo nadaljevanje sedanjega pristopa, odprto metodo usklajevanja, povečano spremljanje in uvedbo okvirne direktive o gozdovih,
whereas the above-mentioned 2009 report to the Commission on ’EU policy options for the protection of European forests against harmful impacts’ identified and studied four policy options, covering continuation of the current approach, the open method of coordination, increased monitoring and the introduction of a forest framework directive,
pozdravlja zeleno knjigo Komisije o varstvu gozdov in informacijah o stanju gozdov v EU ter o tem, kako pripraviti gozdove na podnebne spremembe; meni, da bi bilo treba strategijo EU o gozdovih okrepiti, da se izboljšata trajnostno upravljanje in ohranjanje gozdov v skladu z načeloma subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti;
Welcomes the Commission Green Paper on forest protection and information in the EU: preparing forests for climate change; considers that the EU strategy on forests should be strengthened with a view to improving sustainable management and conservation, in accordance with the subsidiarity and proportionality principles;
vseeno poudarja, da lahko EU v skladu s členom 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ukrepa na področjih, kjer države članice očitno ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči ciljev predlaganega ukrepa;
Emphasises, however, that pursuant to Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, the EU may act in areas where, demonstrably, the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States;
pozdravlja mnenje Komisije, da bi morali gozdove obravnavati kot najpomembnejši dejavnik pri reševanju podnebne krize; poudarja, da je trajnostno upravljanje gozdov osrednjega pomena za to, da EU doseže svoje podnebne cilje in zagotovi potrebne ekosistemske storitve, kot so biotska raznovrstnost, zaščita pred naravnimi nesrečami in zajemanje CO2 iz ozračja;
Welcomes the Commission's view that forests should be seen as a major contributor to solving the climate crisis; emphasises that sustainable forest management is of pivotal importance in the EU achieving its climate goals and delivering necessary ecosystem services such as biodiversity, protection against natural disasters, and capturing of CO2 from the atmosphere;
opozarja, da gozdovi tvorijo biosfere, ki obsegajo veliko več kot zgolj drevesa, in da je zato njihova odpornost odvisna od biotske raznovrstnosti ne samo dreves, temveč vseh gozdnih organizmov, zlasti divjih gozdnih živali, ter da so gozdovi bistvenega pomena za prilagajanje evropskih družb podnebnim spremembam;
Recalls that forests make up biospheres comprising much more than trees, and that their resilience thus depends on the biological diversity not only of trees but of all forest organisms, particularly wild animals living in the forest, and that forests are essential for the adaptation of European societies to climate change;
opominja, da so gozdovi glavna shramba ogljika in imajo zato bistveno vlogo v boju proti podnebnim spremembam; poudarja, da je zato za EU življenjskega pomena, da okrepi svojo strategijo za boj proti dejavnikom, ki povzročajo slabšanje kakovosti gozdov, kot so požari in onesnaženost zraka;
Recalls that forests are the main repository of carbon and have a vital role to play in the fight against climate change; stresses that it is therefore vital for the EU to reinforce its strategy for combating the factors causing deterioration of forests, such as fires and atmospheric pollution;
je prepričan, da je ekološka trajnost predpogoj za ohranitev gospodarskih in družbenih funkcij evropskih gozdov;
Is convinced that ecological sustainability is the prerequisite for continuation of the economic and social functions of EU forests;
poudarja vlogo, ki jo ima biotska raznovrstnost gozdov pri prilagajanju na podnebne spremembe, in potrebo po izboljšanju znanja o kazalnikih biotske raznovrstnosti gozdov, predvsem o njihovi genetski zmogljivosti, za boljše prilagajanje;
Underlines the role that forest biodiversity plays in adaptating to climate change and the need to improve knowledge about forest biodiversity indicators – including in particular forest genetic capacity – in the interests of better adaptation;
čestita Komisiji za izčrpno analizo biotskih in abiotskih nevarnosti v zeleni knjigi ter opozarja, da je treba poleg tega preučiti tudi druge dejavnike, ki so neposredno povezani z učinkom podnebnih sprememb na gozdove, kot je defoliacija, pri čemer opominja, da se je površina osutih drevesnih krošenj v južnoevropskih gozdovih v zadnjih dvajsetih letih podvojila, kar je neposredno povzročilo manjšo zmogljivost in učinkovitost procesov vezave ogljika ter zmanjšanje blažilnega učinka gozdov med sušo ali vročinskimi valovi zaradi predčasnega odpadanja listja;
Congratulates the Commission on the exhaustive analysis of biotic and abiotic threats in its Green Paper, and draws attention to the need to examine, in addition, other factors directly linked to the impact of climate change on forests, such as defoliation, recalling that the defoliated treetop surface in southern European forests has doubled in the last 20 years, resulting, in terms of direct consequences, in reduced capacity and efficiency in the carbon-fixing processes and in the reduction of forests’ tempering effect in periods of drought or heatwaves, due to trees’ premature loss of leaves;
priznava pomembni prispevek obstoječih svetovnih sistemov certificiranja, kot sta organizacija Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) in program za potrditev sistemov za certificiranje gozdov (PEFC), k trajnostnemu gozdarstvu;
Recognises the important contributions made to sustainable forestry by existing global certification schemes, such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes (PEFC);
poudarja, da je treba gozdarsko strategijo EU in akcijski načrt za gozdarstvo posodobiti, da bodo vključeni tudi razsežnost podnebnih sprememb in širša vprašanja varstva gozdov; želi spomniti, da mora tovrstno revizijo vsekakor spremljati obsežna razprava o gozdarski politiki z državami članicami in vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, ki jih zadeva izvajanje predlaganih ukrepov;
Stresses that the above-mentioned EU Forestry Strategy and Forest Action Plan should be updated to include the climate-change dimension and wider forest protection issues; recalls that a comprehensive forest policy debate with the Member States and all stakeholders affected by the implementation of the proposed measures must precede any such review;
pozdravlja uspeh prizadevanj EU za dosego svetovne konkurenčnosti evropskih gospodarskih dejavnosti, temelječih na gozdarstvu;
Welcomes the success of EU efforts to achieve global competitiveness for European forest-based industries;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj okrepijo prizadevanja za uresničevanje okoljskih ciljev in ciljev za kakovost življenja iz akcijskega načrta za gozdove, katerega izvajanje je zaenkrat v zaostanku;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to intensify efforts to achieve the environment and quality-of-life goals of the FAP, the implementation of which is currently lagging behind;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvede analizo politik EU, ki vplivajo na gozdove EU, in ugotovi, ali so skladne in ali zagotavljajo varstvo gozdov;
Calls on the Commission to conduct an analysis of EU policies impacting on EU forests in order to examine whether they are coherent and guarantee forest protection;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvede analizo trenutno razpoložljivih sredstev za gozdove in gozdarstvo ter v skladu s sklepi Sveta za okolje iz marca 2010 prerazporedi obstoječa sredstva, ki imajo negativen učinek za biotsko raznovrstnost gozdov;
Calls on the Commission to conduct an analysis of the funding currently available for forests and forestry and to reallocate existing funds which impact negatively on forest biodiversity, in line with the above-mentioned Council conclusions of March 2010;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pospešijo izvajanje ukrepov iz sporočila Komisije z dne 27. februarja 2008 o inovativnih in trajnostnih gospodarskih panogah EU, ki temeljijo na gozdarstvu ( KOM(2008)0113 konč.), pri čemer naj upoštevajo, da bi utegnili lesni proizvodi zaradi čezmernega urejanja postati manj konkurenčni kot neobnovljivi in energetsko intenzivni materiali;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to step up implementation of the actions set out in the Commission Communication of 27 February 2008 on innovative and sustainable forest-based industries in the EU ( COM(2008)0113 ), taking into consideration that excessive regulation may make timber products less competitive compared to non-renewable and energy intensive materials;
poudarja, da bi ukrepi za varstvo gozdov morali odsevati čezmejno naravo biotskih in abiotskih nevarnosti glede na tip gozda, bioklimatsko območje in regionalne razmere; poleg tega poudarja, da bi bilo treba ukrepati za podporo, usklajevanje in dopolnjevanje političnih pobud držav članic in regij, kjer bi lahko EU prispevala dodano vrednost, in sicer v skladu z gozdno nomenklaturo, ki jo je razvila Evropska agencija za okolje;
Stresses that measures for forest protection should reflect the cross-border nature of biotic and abiotic threats, according to their type, bioclimatic zone and regional conditions; stresses, further, that action to support, coordinate and supplement policy initiatives by the Member States and regions should be taken where the EU possesses added value, and in accordance with the forest nomenclature developed by the EEA;
poudarja, da je varstvo gozdov odvisno od dolgoročne zavezanosti držav članic, regij, na gozdarstvu temelječih gospodarskih dejavnostih ter javnih in zasebnih lastnikov gozdov;
Stresses that forest protection depends on long-term commitment on the part of Member States, the regions, forest-based industries and both public and private forest owners;
meni, da so severni borealni gozdovi (tajga) in sredozemski gozdovi izjemno dragoceni za evropsko biotsko raznovrstnost in kot ponori ogljika iz ozračja ter bi morali biti bolje zaščiteni;
Considers that the northern Boreal forests (taiga) and the Mediterranean forests are of immense value in terms of European biodiversity and as sinks of atmospheric carbon, and should benefit from enhanced protection;
meni, da bi dolgoročno načrtovanje gozdov moralo biti prožno, prilagodljivo in participativno ter bi moralo upoštevati vse možne scenarije, dopuščati preučitev več možnosti za prihodnji razvoj ter zagotavljati realistično in zanesljivo podlago za podporo pri sprejemanju upravljavskih odločitev; meni tudi, da bi to na ravni EU moralo potekati v obliki stalnega ’gozdnega foruma’, s čimer bi zagotovili dolgoročno varstvo gozdov;
Considers that long-term forest planning should be flexible, adaptive and participative, taking into account all conceivable scenarios, allowing for consideration of multiple options for future development, and providing a realistic and reliable basis for management decision support; considers, further, that at EU level this should take the form of a permanent ’Forest Forum’ to ensure long-term forest protection;
pozdravlja uspeh konference Forest Europe pri krepitvi trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov in doseganju evropskega soglasja o smernicah, merilih in kazalnikih trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov; ugotavlja pa, da je za zdaj pri tem manjka skladnega izvajanja;
Welcomes the success of Forest Europe in enhancing SFM and achieving European consensus on SFM guidelines, criteria and indicators; notes however that the existing context of SFM, lacks consistent implementation;
opominja, da trajnostno upravljanje gozdov usklajuje proizvodne in varovalne vidike gozdov in s tem zagotavlja ohranjanje njihovih gospodarskih, družbenih in okoljskih funkcij v skladu z nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi prednostnimi nalogami; z zaskrbljenostjo opaža vse večjo težnjo po obravnavanju gozdov samo z gospodarskega vidika, pri čemer se pozablja na njihove okoljske in družbene vidike, kar je popolnoma neskladno z načeli trajnostnega upravljanja gozdov;
Recalls that the aim of SFM is to reconcile production and protection aspects of forests, ensuring the continuity of their economic, social and environmental functions, in accordance with national, regional and local priorities; notes with concern that the growing trend to consider forests only from an economic perspective, forgetting their environmental and social aspects, is incompatible with the principles of SFM;
poziva Komisijo, naj poda predloge za dopolnitev uredbe (EU) št. 995/2010 o lesu, s katerim bi tako zagotovila, da bo ves les ali lesni izdelki, dani na evropski trg, izviral iz trajnostno upravljanih gozdov;
Calls for the Commission to make proposals to complement the above-mentioned Timber Regulation (EU) 995/2010 to ensure that all timber or timber products placed on the European market are sourced from sustainably managed forests;
spodbuja države članice in Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadevajo za odpravo nezakonite sečnje in trgovine s tako pridobljenim lesom, saj bodo s tem pripomogle k preprečevanju krčenja in propadanja gozdov ter izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti;
Encourages the Member States and the Commission to continue their efforts to stamp out illegal logging and the trade in timber thus produced, as by so doing they will help to combat deforestation, forest degradation and biodiversity loss;