natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi morala Komisija v zvezi s surovinami izvajati trajnostno in celovito strategijo, ki zajema več politik, ter hkrati upoštevati, da so lahko omejitve izvoza in izvozne dajatve pomembne za uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev, varstvo okolja ali trajnostno izkoriščanje naravnih virov v najmanj razvitih državah in malih otoških državah v razvoju ter drugih državah v razvoju, z izjemo držav BRIC; ugotavlja, da so države članice STO, ki uporabljajo izvozne dajatve, večinoma države v razvoju in najmanj razvite države; poziva EU, naj ne poskuša prepovedati uporabe izvoznih taks za najmanj razvite države, male otoške države v razvoju in druge države v razvoju, z izjemo držav BRIC, v STO in dvostranskih trgovinskih sporazumih ter sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu, dokler ne bodo dosegle statusa naprednejših držav v razvoju, saj bi to omejilo politični prostor držav v razvoju za uporabo tega orodja za vidike dodane vrednosti, diverzifikacije, zaščite novih industrijskih panog, varnosti hrane, prihodkov in okolja;
Considers that, with regard to raw materials, the Commission should pursue a sustainable, comprehensive and cross-policy strategy, while recognising that export restrictions and export taxes may be seen as important for the support of development objectives, the protection of the environment or the sustainable exploitation of natural resources in LDCs and SIDs and other developing countries, with the exclusion of BRIC countries; notes that the majority of WTO members using export taxes are developing countries and LDCs; calls on the EU to refrain from attempting to ban the use of export taxes for LDCs and SIDs and other developing countries, with the exclusion of BRIC countries, at the WTO and in bilateral trade agreements and Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), as it would limit their policy space to use this tool for value-addition, diversification, infant industry protection, food security, revenue and environmental considerations as long as they have not reached advanced developing status;
meni, da bi se morali trgovinski partnerji, da bi se v celoti zavedali koristi liberalizacije trgovine v državah, ki odpirajo svoje trge ter odpravljajo tarife in netarifne ovire, medsebojno dogovoriti o prehodnih obdobjih postopnega uvajanja v zvezi z odobritvijo dostopa do trgov v nekaterih občutljivih sektorjih ter naložb vanje ali, v izjemnih primerih, njihovi popolni izključitvi;
Concludes that, in order to fully appreciate the benefits of trade liberalisation in those countries that open their markets and lift tariffs and NTBs, the trade partners should mutually agree on transitional phasing-in periods with respect to granting access to markets in certain sensitive sectors and investment therein or, in exceptional cases, excluding them completely;
v skladu s trgovinskimi načeli EU-ZDA za storitve informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij (podpisanimi z ZDA v skladu s Pogodbo o ES) poziva Komisijo, naj v celoti pregleda in obravnava diskriminacijske ali nesorazmerne predpise, obveznosti in druge zakonodajne metode v zvezi z informacijskimi in komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami, ki omejujejo prost pretok informacij in dostop storitev do trga ter poglabljajo digitalno vrzel;
In accordance with the EU-US Trade Principles for Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Services (signed with the US under TEC), urges the Commission to fully review and address the use of discriminatory or disproportionate regulations, liabilities and other legislative methods against ICT networks and services to restrict open flow of information and market access for services and further the digital divide;
meni, da je treba dati prednost trgovinskim oviram in oviram za naložbe, ki vplivajo na evropske storitvene sektorje, med drugim na informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije ter telekomunikacije, strokovne in poslovne storitve, finančne storitve, gradbeništvo, prodajo na drobno in distribucijo; meni namreč, da so ti netarifni ukrepi, ki vključujejo domače predpise, omejitve glede lastništva in različne krizne ukrepe (vključno z diskriminacijskimi določbami na področju javnih naročil), posebej pomembni glede na večjo dodano vrednost, ki jo prinaša trgovina s storitvami, in položaj EU kot največje izvoznice storitev;
Considers that due priority should be given to trade and investment barriers that affect European service sectors, including ICT and telecommunication, professional and business services, financial services, construction, retail and distribution; these non-tariff measures, including domestic regulations, ownership restrictions and various crisis measures (including discriminatory provisions in public procurement), are of particular importance given the higher value-added of services trade and the EU's position as the largest exporter of services;
meni, da bi bilo treba vzpostaviti mehanizem za mediacijo v STO, ki bi olajšal odpravo netarifnih ovir na konstruktiven, učinkovit, hiter in neizzivalen način, na podlagi sistema SOLVIT in v skladu s prejšnjimi podobnimi predlogi EU in Indije;
Takes the view that a mediation mechanism should be created in the WTO to facilitate the removal of NTBs in a constructive, effective, rapid and non-confrontational manner, inspired by the SOLVIT system, in accordance with similar earlier suggestions from both the EU and India;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. decembra 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1085/2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) ( KOM(2011)0446 – C7-0208/2011 – 2011/0193(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) ( COM(2011)0446 – C7-0208/2011 – 2011/0193(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2011)0446 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2011)0446 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 212(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7-0208/2011 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 212(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0208/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0397/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0397/2011 ),
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. decembra 2011.
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure Position of the European Parliament of 14 December 2011.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1085/2006 z dne 17. julija 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno promoč (IPA) UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 of 17 July 2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
V Uredbi (ES) št. 1085/2006 je jasna razlika med državami kandidatkami in potencialnimi državami kandidatkami.
Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 draws a clear distinction between candidate countries and potential candidate countries.
Evropski svet je 17. junija 2010 pozdravil mnenje Komisije o prošnji Islandije za članstvo v Uniji, potrdil, da je Islandija izpolnila politična merila, določena na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Kopenhagnu leta 1993, in sklenil, da bi se pristopna pogajanja z Islandijo morala začeti.
The European Council of 17 June 2010 welcomed the Commission opinion on Iceland's application for membership of the Union, noted that Iceland met the political criteria set by the Copenhagen European Council in 1993 and decided that accession negotiations with Iceland should be opened.
Islandija je torej država kandidatka.
Iceland is therefore a candidate country.
Evropski svet je 17. decembra 2010 podprl sklepe Sveta z dne 14. decembra 2010 o širitvi in se strinjal, da se Črni gori dodeli status države kandidatke.
The European Council of 17 December 2010 endorsed the Council's conclusions of 14 December 2010 on enlargement and agreed to grant Montenegro the status of a candidate country.
Svet je Komisijo pozval, da predlaga spremembo člena 19 Uredbe (ES) št. 1085/2006 z namenom, da se jasneje določijo pravila za sodelovanje pri dodeljevanju pogodb o donacijah, financiranih v okviru komponente čezmejnega sodelovanja IPA, in zagotovi usklajenost z drugimi instrumenti za zunanjo pomoč, zlasti z Evropskim instrumentom sosedstva in partnerstva.
The Council has invited the Commission to propose an amendment to Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 with a view to clarifying the rules regarding participation in the award of grant contracts financed under the IPA Cross-Border Cooperation Component and ensuring coherence with other external aid instruments, in particular the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 389/2006 z dne 27. februarja 2006 o oblikovanju instrumenta finančne podpore za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja turške skupnosti na Cipru UL L 65, 7.3.2006, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 389/2006 of 27 February 2006 establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community OJ L 65, 7.3.2006, p.
določi odbor iz Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3906/89 z dne 18. decembra 1989 o gospodarski pomoči nekaterim državam Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope UL L 375, 23.12.1989, str.
designates the committee provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 of 18 December 1989 on economic aid to certain countries of Central and Eastern Europe OJ L 375, 23.12.1989, p.
(v nadaljnjem besedilu: odbor Phare) za pomoč Komisiji pri upravljanju podpore turški skupnosti na Cipru.
(the ‘Phare committee’) to assist the Commission in the management of the assistance to the Turkish Cypriot community.
V skladu s členom 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 1085/2006 je bila Uredba (EGS) št. 3906/89 razveljavljena, vendar se še vedno uporablja za pravne akte in obveznosti glede izvrševanja proračunskih let pred letom 2007.
In accordance with Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006, Regulation (EEC) No 3906/89 has been repealed; however, it continues to apply for legal acts and commitments implementing the budget years preceding 2007.
Ker je Uredba (ES) št. 389/2006 še vedno osnovni akt za finančno podporo turški skupnosti na Cipru po teh proračunskih letih, bi moral odbor Phare še naprej delovati v ta namen.
Since Regulation (EC) No 389/2006 continues to be the basic act for financial support to the Turkish Cypriot community beyond those budget years, the Phare committee should also be continued for that purpose.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1085/2006 bi bilo zato treba ustrezno spremeniti −
Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly,
Uredba (ES) št. 1085/2006 se spremeni:
Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 is hereby amended as follows:
v členu 19 se doda naslednji odstavek: 9.
In Article 19, the following paragraph is added: 9.
Odstavki 1 do 8 ne posegajo v sodelovanje tistih kategorij organizacij, ki so upravičene zaradi svoje narave ali lokalizacije glede ciljev ukrepa.
Paragraphs 1 to 8 shall be without prejudice to the participation of categories of eligible organisations by nature or by localisation in regard to the objectives of the action.
v členu 25(1) se drugi pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Article 25(1), the second subparagraph is replaced by the following:
Te uredbe in Uredba (ES) št. 2666/2000 se še naprej uporabljajo za pravne akte in obveznosti glede izvrševanja proračunskih let pred letom 2007, za izvajanje člena 31 Akta o pogojih pristopa Republike Bolgarije in Romunije in prilagoditvah Pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija*, in za izvajanje člena 3 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 389/2006 z dne 27. februarja 2006 o oblikovanju instrumenta finančne podpore za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja turške skupnosti na Cipru**.
Those Regulations, as well as Regulation (EC) No 2666/2000, shall continue to apply for legal acts and commitments implementing the budget years preceding 2007, for the implementation of Article 31 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded* and for the implementation of Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 389/2006 of 27 February 2006 establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community**.
* UL L 157, 21.6.2005, str.
* OJ L 157, 21.6.2005, p.
** UL L 65, 7.3.2006, str.
** OJ L 65, 7.3.2006, p.
v Prilogi I se za vnosom za Hrvaško vstavita naslednja vnosa:
In Annex I, the following entries are inserted after the entry concerning Croatia:
v Prilogi II se črtata naslednja vnosa:
In Annex II, the following entries are deleted:
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. decembra 2011 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 2001/112/ES o sadnih sokovih in nekaterih podobnih proizvodih, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi ( KOM(2010)0490 – C7-0278/2010 – 2010/0254(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2011 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 2001/112/EC relating to fruit juices and certain similar products intended for human consumption ( COM(2010)0490 – C7-0278/2010 – 2010/0254(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0490 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0490 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0278/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0278/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju zaveze predstavnika Sveta v pismu z dne 18. novembra 2011, da bo Svet odobril stališče Parlamenta, v skladu s členom 294(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 18 November 2011 to approve Parliament's position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenja Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0224/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0224/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 43(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2) thereof,
Da bi
In order
zaščitili interese potrošnikov in
to protect the interests of consumers and
povečali prosti pretok sadnih sokov in nekaterih podobnih proizvodov v Evropski uniji, Direktiva Sveta 2001/112/ES z dne 20. decembra 2001 o sadnih sokovih in nekaterih podobnih proizvodih, namenjenih za prehrano ljudi UL L 10, 12.1.2002, str.
to enhance the free movement of fruit juices and certain similar products within the European Union, Council Directive 2001/112/EC of 20 December 2001 relating to fruit juices and certain similar products intended for human consumption OJ L 10, 12.1.2002, p.
, določa posebne določbe glede proizvodnje, sestave in označevanja zadevnih proizvodov.
has laid down specific provisions regarding production, composition and labelling of the products concerned.
Ta pravila bi bilo treba prilagoditi tehničnemu napredku in
Those rules should be adapted to technical progress and should
čim bolj
, as far as possible,
upoštevati razvoj ustreznih mednarodnih standardov, zlasti standard Kodeksa za sadne sokove in nektarje (Codex Stan 247-2005), ki ga je sprejela Komisija za Codex Alimentarius na 28. zasedanju od 4. do 9. julija 2005
take account of developments in relevant international standards, in particular the Codex Standard for fruit juices and nectars (Codex Stan 247-2005) which was adopted by the Codex Alimentarius Commission during its 28th session on 4-9 July 2005
(standard Kodeksa)
(Codex Standard)
Ta standard Kodeksa določa zlasti dejavnike kakovosti in zahteve glede označevanja za sadne sokove in podobne proizvode.
The Codex Standard establishes, in particular, quality factors and labelling requirements for fruit juices and similar products.
Brez poseganja v Direktivo
Without prejudice to
2000/13/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. marca 2000 o približevanju zakonodaj držav članic o označevanju, predstavitvi in oglaševanju živil
Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs
UL L 124, 25.5.2000, str.
OJ L 124, 25.5.2000, p.
je treba spremeniti posebne določbe Direktive Sveta 2001/112/ES z dne 20. decembra 2001 o sadnih sokovih in nekaterih podobnih proizvodih, da bodo razvidna nova pravila o dovoljenih sestavinah, kot so tista, ki se nanašajo na dodajanje sladkorjev, ki pri sadnih sokovih niso več dovoljeni.
it is necessary to amend the specific provisions of Directive 2001/112/EC on the labelling of fruit juices and similar products to reflect the new rules on authorised ingredients, such as those pertaining to the addition of sugars, which are no longer authorised in fruit juices.
Prehranska trditev „brez dodanih sladkorjev“, ki je navedena v prilogi k Uredbi (ES) št. 1924/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih
The nutrition claim ‘with no added sugars’, as listed in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods
UL L 404, 30.12.2006. str.
OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, p.
, se že zelo dolgo uporablja za sadne sokove.
, has been used in relation to fruit juice for a very long time.
Glede na nove zahteve o sestavi sadnih sokov iz te direktive bi se ob nenadni odpravi te trditve po prehodnem obdobju lahko zgodilo, da ne bi bilo mogoče takoj jasno razlikovati med sadnimi sokovi in drugimi pijačami glede dodanih sladkorjev v proizvodih, kar bi škodovalo sektorju sadnih sokov.
In the light of the new compositional requirements for fruit juices provided for in this Directive, its disappearance from one day to the next after the transitional period might not allow an immediate clear distinction between fruit juices and other drinks in terms of the addition of sugars in the products, which would be detrimental to the fruit juices sector.
Zato je primerno predvideti omejeno obdobje, da bi lahko proizvajalci potrošnike o tem ustrezno obvestili.
Provision should therefore be made, for a limited time, to enable the industry to inform consumers properly.
Da bi priloge k Direktivi 2001/112/ES prilagodili glede na razvoj ustreznih mednarodnih standardov ter upoštevali tehnični napredek, bi bilo treba Komisijo pooblastiti
In order to bring the Annexes to Directive 2001/112/EC into line with developments in relevant international standards and to take into account technical progress, the power
za sprejemanje ▌aktov v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije v zvezi s
to adopt ▌acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Da bi lahko države članice sprejele nacionalne zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, bi bilo treba določiti 18-mesečno obdobje prenosa.
In order to allow Member States to adopt national laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive, a transposition period of 18 months should be established.
V tem obdobju bi se še naprej uporabljale zahteve iz Direktive 2001/112/ES brez sprememb, ki jih uvaja ta direktiva.
During that period the requirements of Directive 2001/112/EC without the amendments introduced by this Directive should remain applicable.
Da bi upoštevali interese gospodarskih subjektov, ki svoje proizvode dajejo v promet ali označujejo v skladu z zahtevami, veljavnimi pred uporabo nacionalnih določb, s katerimi se prenese ta direktiva, je treba določiti ustrezne prehodne ukrepe.
In order to take into account the interests of economic operators who place on the market or label their products in accordance with the requirements applicable before the application of the national provisions transposing this Directive, it is necessary to establish appropriate transitional measures.
Zato je treba v tej direktivi tudi določiti, da se lahko ti proizvodi v omejenem obdobju še naprej tržijo.
Therefore, this Directive should provide that those products may continue to be marketed for a limited period of time.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer prilagoditve Direktive 2001/112/ES tehničnemu napredku ob upoštevanju standarda Kodeksa, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker ta cilj zaradi njegovega učinka laže doseže Unija, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to adapt Directive 2001/112/EC to technical progress whilst taking into account the Codex Standard, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.
Direktivo 2001/112/ES bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti –
Directive 2001/112/EC should be amended accordingly,
Sprememba Direktive 2001/112/ES
Amendment of Directive 2001/112/EC
Direktiva 2001/112/ES se spremeni:
Directive 2001/112/EC is amended as follow:
V členu 1 se doda naslednji odstavek:
In Article 1, the following paragraph is added:
Člen 2 se črta.
Article 2 is deleted.
V členu 3 se odstavek 3 ▌nadomesti z naslednjim: 3.
In Article 3, paragraph 3 ▌is replaced by the following: 3.
Pri proizvodih, proizvedenih iz dveh ali več vrst sadja, razen pri uporabi limoninega
For products manufactured from two or more fruits, except where lemon
limetinega soka pod pogoji, opredeljenimi v delu II.2 Priloge I,
lime juice are used under the conditions laid down in Part II.2 of Annex I, the product
uporabljenih vrst sadja po padajočem vrstnem redu glede na volumsko vsebnost vključenih sadnih sokov ali kaš
a list of the fruits used, in descending order of the volume of the fruit juices or purées included
, kot je navedeno na seznamu sestavin
, as indicated in the list of ingredients
Vendar se pri proizvodih, proizvedenih iz treh ali več vrst sadja, podatek o uporabljenih vrstah sadja lahko nadomesti z izrazom ‚več vrst sadja‘ ali s podobnim besedilom ali z navedbo števila vrst uporabljenega sadja.
However, in the case of products manufactured from three or more fruits, the indication of the fruits used may be replaced by the words “several fruits” or a similar wording, or by the number of fruits used.
V členu 3 se odstavek 4 črta.
In Article 3, paragraph 4 is deleted.
‚Člen 4
Article 4
Ta podatek mora biti naveden na
This reference shall appear
enem od naslednjih elementov
on one of the following:
na oznaki, pritrjeni na embalažo, ali
on a label attached to the packaging; or
na spremnem dokumentu.
on an accompanying document.
* UL L 354, 31.12.2008, str.
* OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p.
V členu 5 se doda naslednji odstavek:
In Article 5, the following paragraph is added:
'Ta direktiva se uporablja za proizvode iz Priloge I, ki so dani v promet v Evropski uniji v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 178/2002.'
This Directive shall apply to the products referred to in Annex I which are placed on the market within the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 178/2002.
Da bi
In order to bring
priloge k tej direktivi
the Annexes to
prilagodili ▌glede na razvoj ustreznih mednarodnih standardov
this Directive into line with ▌developments in relevant international standards
k tej direktivi, z izjemo
to this Directive, with the exception