natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker nekaterih investicijskih družb, zlasti zavarovalnic, ni mogoče razpustiti v trenutku in je potrebna rešitev, ki bo vodila v pravično postopno razporeditev premoženja; ker se prenosa poslovanja, prenehanja ali nadaljnjega delovanja ne sme preprečiti in je treba tem vprašanjem po potrebi dati prednost;
whereas some investment companies, particularly insurers, cannot be dissolved on a ‘snapshot’ basis and require an outcome that achieves an equitable distribution of assets over time; whereas transfer of business, run-off, or continuity of operation should not be prevented and may need to be prioritised;
ker bi morale biti odločitve o tem, da se v postopke zaradi insolventnosti vključijo tudi skupine in ne samo posamezni pravni subjekti, ciljno usmerjene v rezultate in bi morale upoštevati vse morebitne posledice, kot sta uporaba drugih reševalnih instrumentov ali učinek na jamstvene sheme, ki zajemajo različne blagovne znamke znotraj skupine;
whereas the decision to involve whole groups rather than single legal entities in insolvency proceedings should be outcome-oriented and should take account of any knock-on effects such as the triggering of other resolution tools or the effect on guarantee schemes that cover multiple brands within a group;
ker bi bilo primerno preučiti in opredeliti postopke za reševanje in standarde za čezmejne konglomerate, zlasti zamenjavo terjatev v lastniške deleže;
whereas it would be appropriate to explore the definition of harmonised bail-in procedures and standards for cross-border conglomerates, including in particular debt-to-equity swaps;
ker je delovno pravo predvsem v pristojnosti držav članic, vendar pa lahko insolvenčno pravo vpliva nanj in je treba v obdobju povečane globalizacije in gospodarske krize vprašanje insolventnosti preučiti z vidika delovnega prava, saj različne opredelitve izrazov „zaposlitev“ in „zaposleni“ v državah članicah ni bi smele škoditi pravicam zaposlenih v primeru insolventnosti; ker razprava o specifičnem vprašanju insolventnosti vseeno ne more biti samodejna pretveza za urejanje delovnega prava na ravni EU;
whereas although employment law is the responsibility of the Member States, insolvency law can have an impact on employment law, and whereas in the context of increasing globalisation – and, indeed, of the economic crisis – the issue of insolvency needs to be considered from an employment-law perspective, as differing definitions of ‘employment’ and ‘employee’ in Member States should not undermine the rights of employees in the event of insolvency; whereas, however, any debate on the specific issue of insolvency should not automatically be a pretext for regulating employment law at EU level;
ker je Direktiva 2008/94/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2008 o varstvu delavcev v primeru plačilne nesposobnosti delodajalca UL L 283, 28.10.2008, str.
whereas the objective of Directive 2008/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer OJ L 283, 28.10.2008, p.
izpolnila zadani cilj, t.j. zagotoviti minimalno zaščito delavcev v primeru plačilne nesposobnosti delodajalca ob hkratni ustrezni prilagodljivosti za države članice; ker med državami članicami obstajajo razlike pri izvajanju in je zaradi njih potreben razmislek;
is to ensure a minimum degree of protection for employees in the event of insolvency, whilst maintaining adequate flexibility for Member States; whereas differences between Member States in terms of implementation do exist and those differences should be considered;
ker Direktiva 2008/94/ES izrecno predvideva, da se v njeno področje uporabe vključijo delavci s krajšim delovnim časom, delavci za določen čas in začasni delavci; ker je treba za primer insolventnosti še bolj zaščititi delavce z netipičnimi pogodbami o zaposlitvi;
whereas Directive 2008/94/EC explicitly includes in its scope part-time employees, employees with a fixed-term contract and employees with a temporary employment relationship; whereas greater protection in the event of insolvency should also be afforded to employees on non-standard contracts;
ker trenutno razvrščanje upnikov ni usklajeno, zaradi česar je izid sodnih postopkov manj predvidljiv; ker je treba prednostno obravnavati terjatve delavcev v primerjavi z drugimi upniki;
whereas the current lack of harmonisation with regard to the ranking of creditors reduces predictability of outcomes of judicial proceedings; whereas it is necessary to increase the priority of employees' claims relative to other creditors' claims;
ker je področje uporabe Direktive 2008/94/ES, zlasti razumevanje pojma „neporavnane terjatve“, preširoko, saj številne države članice uporabljajo ozko opredelitev prejemkov (ki ne vključuje npr. odpravnine, dodatkov, povračila stroškov itd.), kar lahko povzroči, da znatni zahtevki ostanejo neporavnani;
whereas the scope of Directive 2008/94/EC, in particular the understanding of ‘outstanding claim’, is too wide, as a number of Member States apply a narrow definition of remuneration (e.g. excluding severance pay, bonuses, reimbursement arrangements, etc.) that can result in substantial claims not being met;
ker so države članice pristojne za opredelitev „nadomestil“ in „plačil“, če naj spoštujejo splošni načeli enakosti in nediskriminacije med delavci, kar pomeni, da morajo v vsakem primeru insolventnosti, ki je delavcem škodljiva, pri njihovih odškodninah upoštevati socialne cilje Direktive 2008/94/ES in najnižji znesek, ki ga je treba še določiti;
whereas Member States are competent to define ‘remuneration’ and ‘pay’, provided that they adhere to the general principles of equality and non-discrimination between workers, with the result that any insolvency situation which is potentially prejudicial to the latter should be taken into account for the purposes of compensating them in accordance with the social objective of Directive 2008/94/EC and with threshold levels of compensation to be determined;
ker je zaradi pogodb o zaposlitvi po EU in njihove raznolikosti v državah članicah trenutno nemogoče opredeliti „zaposlenega“ na evropski ravni;
whereas, due to employment contracts across the EU and the diversity of such contracts within Member States, it is currently impossible to seek to define ‘employee’ at European level;
ker bi se bilo treba kar najbolj izogibati izjemam glede področja uporabe Direktive 2008/94/ES;
whereas exemptions from the scope of Directive 2008/94/EC should be avoided as far as possible;
ker naj bi zakonodajni ukrep iz te resolucije temeljil na podrobnih ocenah učinka, kot je to zahteval Parlament;
whereas the legislative action requested in this resolution should be based on detailed impact assessments, as requested by Parliament;
poziva, naj Komisija na podlagi člena 50, člena 81(2) ali člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in v skladu s priporočili iz prilog pripravi enega ali več predlogov, povezanih z okvirom EU za insolventnost družb, da se na podlagi poglobljene analize vseh izvedljivih možnosti zagotovijo enaki pogoji za vse;
Requests the Commission to submit, on the basis of Article 50, Article 81(2) or Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, one or more proposals relating to an EU corporate insolvency framework, following the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto, in order to ensure a level playing field, based on a profound analysis of all viable alternatives;
potrjuje, da ta priporočila spoštujejo temeljne pravice in načelo subsidiarnosti;
Confirms that the recommendations respect fundamental rights and the principle of subsidiarity;
meni, da je treba finančne posledice zahtevanega predloga kriti z ustrezno dodelitvijo proračunskih sredstev;
Considers that the financial implications of the requested proposal should be covered by appropriate budgetary allocations;
PODROBNA PRIPOROČILA GLEDE VSEBINE ZAHTEVANEGA PREDLOGA
DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED
postopki zaradi insolventnosti se lahko uvedejo proti dolžnikom, ki so fizične ali pravne osebe ali združenja;
insolvency proceedings can be brought against debtors who are natural persons, legal entities or associations;
postopki zaradi insolventnosti se začnejo pravočasno, da je rešitev podjetja v težavah še možna;
insolvency proceedings are initiated in a timely manner in order to allow a rescue of the troubled enterprise;
postopki zaradi insolventnosti se lahko uvedejo glede premoženja zgoraj omenjenih dolžnikov, premoženja subjektov, ki niso pravne osebe (npr. evropskega gospodarskega interesnega združenja), zapuščine in premoženja v skupni lasti;
insolvency proceedings can be opened concerning the assets of the above-mentioned debtors, the assets of entities without legal personality (e.g. a European Economic Interest Grouping), a descendant's estate and the assets of a community of property;
postopke zaradi insolventnosti lahko uvedejo vsa podjetja, če bodo to storila začasno z namenom, da se zavarujejo;
all companies can start insolvency proceedings in cases where the insolvency is temporary, in order to protect themselves;
postopki zaradi insolventnosti se lahko uvedejo tudi po prenehanju pravne osebe ali subjekta brez statusa pravne osebe, če premoženje še ni bilo razdeljeno, ali če je premoženje še na razpolago;
insolvency proceedings can also be opened after the dissolution of a legal entity or of an entity without legal personality, as long as the distribution of the assets has not yet taken place, or in cases where assets are still available;
postopke zaradi insolventnosti lahko uvede sodišče ali drugi pristojni organ na pisni predlog upnika ali dolžnika; zahtevek za začetek postopka je mogoče umakniti, dokler se postopek ne prične ali sodišče zahtevka ne zavrne;
insolvency proceedings can be opened by a court or other competent authority upon a written request of a creditor or the debtor; the request for the opening of the proceedings can be withdrawn as long as the proceedings have not been opened or the request has not been refused by a court;
upnik lahko zahteva uvedbo postopka, če ima pravni interes in verodostojno dokaže, da je njegov zahtevek upravičen;
a creditor may request the opening of proceedings if he/she has a legal interest therein and shows credibly that he/she has got a claim;
postopek se lahko uvede, če je dolžnik insolventen, tj. nesposoben poravnati plačilne obveznosti; če zahtevek vloži dolžnik, je postopek lahko uveden tudi, če je dolžnik na pragu insolventnosti, tj. če je zelo verjetno, da dolžnik ne bo zmožen poravnati plačilnih obveznosti;
proceedings can be opened if the debtor is insolvent, i.e. unable to satisfy the payment obligations; if the request is made by the debtor, the proceedings can also be opened if the debtor's insolvency is imminent, i.e. if the debtor is likely not to be able to satisfy the payment obligations;
kar zadeva dolžnikovo obvezno razglasitev stečaja, je mogoče postopek uvesti od enega do dveh mesecev po prenehanju plačevanja, če sodišče še ni začelo predhodnega postopka ali sprejelo drugih ustreznih ukrepov, da se zaščiti premoženje, in če je še razpoložljivo ustrezno premoženje za kritje stroškov postopkov zaradi insolventnosti;
as far as mandatory filing for bankruptcy by the debtor is concerned, the proceedings must be opened within a period of between one and two months after the cessation of payments if the court has not already initiated preliminary proceedings or other appropriate measures in order to protect the assets and provided that adequate assets are available to cover the costs of the insolvency proceedings;
države članice morajo določiti pravila, po katerih bi bil dolžnik odgovoren, če ne bi vložil zahtevka za začetek postopka ali če ga ne bi vložil ustrezno, morajo pa tudi poskrbeti za učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne sankcije;
Member States are required to lay down rules rendering the debtor liable in the event of non-filing or improper filing, and to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
datum za ugotovitev neplačanih terjatev je isti kot datum začetka insolventnosti delodajalca, se pravi datum sklepa o zahtevi za začetek postopka zaradi insolventnosti;
the date for determining outstanding claims is the date on which the employer becomes insolvent, i.e. the date of the decision on the application to open insolvency proceedings or the date when the opening of proceedings was refused on grounds that the costs were not covered;
upniki pisno prijavijo terjatve pri upravitelju v določenem časovnem roku;
creditors file their claim with the liquidator in written form within a certain period of time;
države članice to obdobje določijo od enega do treh mesecev od datuma objave sklepa o stečaju;
Member States are required to fix the above-mentioned period of time within one to three months from the date of publication of the bankruptcy decision;
upnik mora posredovati dokumentacijo, s katero dokaže terjatev;
the creditor is required to submit documentation in support of the claim;
upravitelj pripravi seznam vseh prijavljenih terjatev in ga posreduje pristojnemu sodišču v smislu točke (d) člena 2 uredbe o insolventnosti;
the liquidator establishes a table of all claims filed and that table is displayed at the competent court within the meaning of point (d) of Article 2 of the Insolvency Regulation;
pozne prijave, tj. prijave upnika, ki prispejo po preteku roka za prijavo terjatve, se preverijo, vendar ima lahko upnik zaradi njih dodatne stroške.
late filings, i.e. filings by a creditor who has missed the deadline for filing the claim, are to be verified but may entail additional costs for the creditor in question.
zakonodaja držav članic določa možnosti za izpodbijanje pravnih dejanj, ki se na škodo upnikov izvedejo pred začetkom postopka;
the laws of the Member States provide for the possibility of challenging acts done before the opening of the proceedings which are detrimental to the creditors;
pravna dejanja, ki jih je mogoče izpodbijati, so transakcije v primeru neizbežne insolventnosti, oblikovanje zavarovanih terjatev, transakcije s povezanimi strankami in transakcije, katerih namen je goljufanje upnikov;
acts that can be the object of an avoidance action are transactions in a situation of imminent insolvency, the creation of security rights, transactions with connected parties and transactions carried out with the intention of defrauding creditors;
obdobje, v katerem je mogoče izpodbijati pravna dejanja, je različno dolgo, kar je odvisno od njihovega značaja; obdobje se začne z datumom vložitve predloga za začetek postopka; traja lahko od tri do devet mesecev za transakcije v primeru neizbežne insolventnosti, od šest do dvanajst mesecev za oblikovanje zavarovanih terjatev, od enega do dveh let za transakcije s povezanimi strankami ter od tri do pet let za transakcije, katerih namen je goljufanje upnikov;
the periods during which an act can be challenged by an avoidance action vary according to the nature of the act at issue; the periods start with the date of the request for the opening of proceedings; the periods could be between three and nine months for transactions carried out in a situation of imminent insolvency, between six and twelve months for the creation of security rights, between one and two years for transactions with connected parties, and between three and five years for transactions carried out with the intention of defrauding creditors;
dokazno breme glede izpodbojnosti dejanja načeloma nosi stranka, ki trdi, da je mogoče dejanje izpodbijati; za transakcije s povezanimi strankami nosi dokazno breme povezana oseba.
the onus of proof to show whether or not an act can be challenged lies in principle with the party who claims that the act can be challenged; for transactions with connected parties, the onus of proof lies with the connected person.
upravitelja mora potrditi pristojni organ države članice oziroma ga mora imenovati pristojno sodišče v državi članici, imeti mora dober ugled in ustrezno izobrazbo, ki je potrebna za opravljanje njegovih dolžnosti;
the liquidator must be approved by a competent authority of a Member State or appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction of a Member State, must be of good repute and must have the educational background needed for the performance of his/her duties;
upravitelj mora biti usposobljen in kvalificiran za oceno položaja dolžnikove pravne osebe ter prevzem dolžnosti vodenja podjetja;
the liquidator must be competent and qualified to assess the situation of the debtor's entity and to take over management duties for the company;
upravitelj ob začetku glavnega postopka zaradi insolventnosti dobi pooblastilo, da v roku šestih mesecev z učinkom za nazaj razglasi premoženje za zavarovano, če se v podjetju nadaljuje s prenosom sredstev;
when main insolvency proceedings are opened, the liquidator should be empowered for a period of six months to decide on the protection of assets with retroactive effect in cases where companies have moved capital;
upravitelju se omogoči, da s pomočjo ustreznih prednostnih postopkov povrne zneske, dolgovane družbi v višini, potrebni za poravnavo dolgov upnikom, oziroma s prenosom terjatev;
the liquidator must be empowered to use appropriate priority procedures to recover monies owing to companies, in advance of settlement with creditors and as an alternative to transfers of claims;
upravitelj mora biti neodvisen od upnikov in drugih deležnikov v postopkih zaradi insolventnosti;
the liquidator must be independent of the creditors and other stakeholders in the insolvency proceedings;
v primeru navzkrižja interesov mora upravitelj odstopiti s položaja.
in the event of a conflict of interest, the liquidator must resign from his/her office.
dolžniki ali upravitelji lahko kot alternativo upoštevanju zakonskih določb pripravijo načrt prestrukturiranja;
as an alternative to complying with statutory rules, debtors or liquidators may present a restructuring plan;
načrt mora vsebovati pravila za poplačilo upnikov in odgovornost dolžnika po zaključku postopkov zaradi insolventnosti;
the plan must contain rules for the satisfaction of the creditors and for the debtor's liability after the insolvency proceeding have been concluded;
načrt mora vsebovati vse ustrezne informacije, da se upniki lahko odločijo, ali načrt lahko sprejmejo;
the plan must contain all relevant information enabling the creditors to decide whether they can accept the plan;
načrt se potrdi ali zavrne v posebnem postopku na ustreznem sodišču;
the plan must be approved or disapproved in a specific procedure before the relevant court;
v celoti poplačani upniki ali stranke, na katere načrt ne vpliva, ne bi smeli imeti pravice glasovanja o načrtu ali vsaj ne bi smeli imeti možnosti, da preprečijo njegovo izvedbo.
unimpaired creditors, or parties that are not affected by the plan, should not be entitled to vote on the plan or, at least, should not be able to impede it.
Ustrezno bi bilo treba revidirati Prilogo A k uredbi o insolventnosti.
Annex A to the Insolvency Regulation should be revised accordingly.
Priporočilo o opredelitvi pojma „središče dolžnikovih glavnih interesov“
Recommendation on the definition of ‘centre of main interests’
Evropski parlament meni, da bi morala uredba o insolventnosti vključevati pojem „središče dolžnikovih glavnih interesov“, ki bo opredeljen tako, da bo onemogočal goljufivo prasko izbiranja najugodnejšega sodišča.
The European Parliament considers that the Insolvency Regulation should include a definition of the term ‘centre of main interest’ formulated in such a way as to prevent fraudulent forum-shopping.
Priporočilo o opredelitvi pojma „poslovalnica“ v kontekstu sekundarnih postopkov
Recommendation on the definition of ‘establishment’ in the context of secondary proceedings
Evropski parlament meni, da bi morala uredba o insolventnosti vključevati opredelitev „poslovalnice“ kot katerega koli kraja delovanja, kjer dolžnik opravlja neprehodno gospodarsko dejavnost z ljudmi, premoženjem in storitvami.
The European Parliament considers that the Insolvency Regulation should include a definition of ‘establishment’ as any place of operations where the debtor carries on a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods and services.
Priporočilo o nekaterih vidikih izpodbijanja dolžnikovih dejanj
Recommendation on certain aspects of avoidance actions
Del 3: Priporočila o insolventnosti povezanih družb
Part 3: Recommendations on the insolvency of groups of companies
Postopek se začne v državi članici, kjer ima skupina operativni sedež.
Proceedings should be opened in the Member State where the operational headquarters of the group are located.
Priznavanje začetka postopka mora biti samodejno.
Recognition of the opening of the proceedings should be automatic.
Z začetkom glavnega postopka se morajo ustaviti postopki v drugih državah članicah proti drugim članicam skupine.
The opening of the main proceedings should result in a stay of the proceedings opened in another Member State against other group members.
Določi se en strokovnjak za vodenje postopkov zaradi solventnosti (stečajni upravitelj).
A single insolvency practitioner should be appointed.
V vsaki državi, v kateri tečejo stranski postopki, je treba oblikovati odbor, ki bo branil in zastopal interese lokalnih upnikov in zaposlenih.
In every Member State in which ancillary proceedings are opened, a committee should be set up to defend and represent the interests of local creditors and employees.
Če ni mogoče določiti, katero premoženje pripada kateremu dolžniku, ali določiti zahtevke med družbami, se premoženje izjemno vsebinsko združi.
If it is impossible to determine which assets belong to which debtor, or to assess inter-company claims, recourse should exceptionally be had to the aggregation of estates.
Pravila za obvezno usklajevanje in sodelovanje med sodišči, med sodišči in stečajnimi upravitelji ter med stečajnimi upravitelji samimi.
Rules for mandatory coordination and cooperation between courts, between courts and insolvency representatives and between insolvency representatives.
Pravila o takojšnjem priznavanju sodnih odločb o začetku, poteku in zaključku postopkov zaradi insolventnosti ter odločbe, izdane v zvezi s takšnimi postopki.
Rules on immediate recognition of judgments concerning the opening, conduct and closure of insolvency proceedings and judgments handed down in connection with such proceedings.
Pravila o dostopu upraviteljev in upnikov do sodišča.
Rules on access to courts by liquidators and creditors.
Pravila, ki olajšajo in spodbujajo uporabo različnih oblik sodelovanja med sodišči, da se postopki zaradi insolventnosti uskladijo ter se vzpostavijo pogoji in varovalni ukrepi, ki morajo veljati za takšne oblike sodelovanja.
Rules to facilitate and promote the use of various forms of cooperation between courts to coordinate the insolvency proceedings and establish the conditions and safeguards that should apply to those forms of cooperation.
posredovanje informacij med sodišči na kakršen koli način,
communication of information between courts by any means,
usklajevanje upravljanja in nadzora dolžnikovega premoženja in poslov,
coordination of the administration and supervision of the debtor's assets and affairs,
pogajanja, odobritev in izvajanje insolvenčnih sporazumov o usklajevanju postopkov,
the negotiation, approval and implementation of insolvency agreements concerning the coordination of proceedings,
usklajevanje zaslišanj.
the coordination of hearings.
Pravila, ki bi omogočala in spodbujala določitev skupnega upravitelja za vse postopke, ki bi ga imenovala vključena sodišča, pomagali pa bi mu lokalni predstavniki v okviru usmerjevalnega odbora; pravila o postopku, ki ureja sodelovanje med člani usmerjevalnega odbora.
Rules allowing and promoting the appointment of a common liquidator for all proceedings, to be nominated by the courts involved and assisted by local representatives forming a steering committee; and rules laying down the procedure governing cooperation between members of the steering committee.