natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obžaluje dejstvo, da države članice samostojno opredeljujejo kmetijske površine v uporabi, kar vodi k znatnim napačnim razporeditvam plačil na obdelano površino; pričakuje ocenjevalno poročilo Komisije za obravnavo in prikaz primerov te prakse;
Deplores the fact that the Member States’ practice of defining used farmland independently results in substantial misallocation of area payments; expects the Commission's evaluation report to consider this practice and illustrate it with examples;
poziva Komisijo:
Invites the Commission:
naj izboljša zanesljivost in popolnost podatkov, zabeleženih v identifikacijskem sistemu parcel,
to improve the reliability and completeness of the data recorded in the Land Parcel Identification System,
naj sprejme proaktivne ukrepe, da bi zagotovil, da vse podatkovne zbirke IAKS zagotavljajo zanesljivo in popolno revizijsko sled za vse opravljene spremembe, s posebno pozornostjo, posvečeno državam, ki so znane po svojih slabih rezultatih;
to take proactive measures to ensure that all the IACS databases provide a reliable and full audit trail for all modifications made, paying particular attention to those countries known to have a poor record,
naj pojasni pravila in dodatno okrepi njihovo izvrševanje, da se neposredna pomoč Unije ne bo izplačevala prosilcem, ki niso uporabljali zemljišča za kmetovanje in ga niti niso vzdrževali v dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih,
to clarify and further enforce the rules so that Union direct aid is not paid to claimants who have neither used the land for farming nor maintained it in Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions,
naj pregleda in izboljša smernice v zvezi z delom, ki ga morajo opraviti certifikacijski organi, predvsem v zvezi z delom, povezanim s potrjevanjem statističnih podatkov o inšpekcijskih pregledih in kontrolah v državah članicah, ter naj Parlamentu sporoči število in oceno zdravja obstoječih plačilnih agencij,
to review and improve the guidelines as regards the work to be performed by certification bodies, in particular the work related to the validation of the Member States’ control and inspection statistics, and to provide Parliament with the number and an assessment of the soundness of the existing paying agencies,
naj dodatno zmanjša birokracijo, poenostavi postopke in se izogne neugodnim učinkom na kmetovalce, ki izvirajo iz preobilja pravil, ki si v nekaterih primerih nasprotujejo;
to further reduce bureaucracy, to simplify procedures and to avoid adverse effects on farmers arising from the plethora of rules, which in some cases conflict;
naj redno obvešča Parlament o napredku pri delu;
to keep Parliament regularly updated about the progress of the work;
meni, da je treba tristranske sestanke Računskega sodišča, Komisije in nacionalnih oblasti, ki so se že izkazali za pomembne za vzajemno razumevanje in presojo o težavah v zvezi z letnim podajanjem izjav o zanesljivosti na področju kohezijske politike, razširiti na politični področji kmetijstva in naravnih virov, da bi se olajšala poenotena razlaga in izvajanje pravil o upravljanju in nadzoru odhodkov, pa tudi uskladil pristop Komisije in Računskega sodišča;
Is of the opinion that the tripartite meetings of the Court of Auditors, the Commission and national authorities, which proved important for the mutual understanding and judgment of problems in relation to the annual DAS exercises in the Cohesion policy area, should be extended to the policy area of agriculture and natural resources in order to facilitate a harmonised interpretation and application of the rules regarding the management and control of expenditure, as well as a coordinated approach between the Commission and the Court of Auditors;
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da potrditev skladnosti preveč poudarja pavšalne izboljšave in usklajevalne prilagoditve, ki ne zadevajo končnega koristnika;
Agrees with the Court of Auditors that the conformity clearance puts too much emphasis on flat-rate corrections and conformity adjustments that do not concern the final beneficiary;
Kohezija – 35 500 000 000 EUR
Cohesion - EUR 35 500 000 000
opozarja, da se poraba za področje kohezije upravlja deljeno z državami članicami, da se odhodki izvršujejo prek velikega števila večletnih operativnih programov, da Komisija odobri te operativne programe na podlagi predlogov držav članic in da države članice izberejo posamezne projekte, ki jih je treba vključiti v operativne programe;
Recalls that management of Cohesion spending is shared with the Member States, that expenditure takes place through a large number of multi-annual operational programmes (OPs), that the Commission approves OPs on the basis of proposals from the Member States and that the Member States choose the individual projects to be included in the OPs;
opozarja, da države članice sofinancirajo projekte iz kohezijske porabe; ugotavlja, da so učinkovito vodenje in nadzorni sistemi v interesu držav članic, ki sodelujejo z nacionalnim sofinanciranjem; poziva Komisijo, naj si odločno prizadeva za izboljšanje in preseganje začasnih pomanjkljivosti pri vodenju in nadzornih sistemih;
Recalls that the Member States co-finance the projects under Cohesion spending; notes that effective management and control systems are of interest to the Member States, who participate with national co-financing; asks the Commission to work decisively to improve and overcome temporary flaws in the management and control systems;
ugotavlja, da je po ocenah Računskega sodišča najverjetnejša stopnja napak na področju kohezije nad 5 %; ugotavlja, da se pogostost napak že tri leta zapored zmanjšuje;
Notes that the Court of Auditors estimates that the most likely error rate for the Cohesion policy area is above 5 %; notes that the frequency of errors continues to decrease for the third consecutive year;
ugotavlja tudi, da so se napake pojavile pri 36 % plačil projektov in da je to še vedno področje z najvišjimi stopnjami napak;
Also notes that 36 % of payments to projects were affected by errors, and that this still is the area with the highest error rate;
meni, da je treba področja porabe, ne zgolj posamezne projekte, oceniti glede na splošni trend napak;
Considers that the spending areas themselves, not just individual projects, must be evaluated on the overall trend of errors;
ugotavlja, da je regulativni okvir na področju kohezije zapleten in zahteva usklajenost z nacionalnimi zahtevami, vključno z regionalnimi in lokalnimi pooblastili, ter različnimi pravili in politikami Unije, kot so tiste, ki zadevajo javna naročila in državno pomoč, številne organe, odgovorne za izvajanje kohezijske politike v državah članicah ter vse večje število upravičencev in prejemnikov podpore Unije;
Notes the complexity of the regulatory framework of Cohesion, requiring conformity with both national requirements, including regional and local powers, and a variety of Union policies and rules, such as those relating to public procurement and State aid, the large number of authorities responsible for the implementation of Cohesion policy in the Member States and the even larger number of beneficiaries and recipients of Union support;
meni, da je ta zapletenost pomembno vprašanje, ki ga je treba upoštevati pri sprejemanju odločitev o izboljšavah in poenostavitvah;
Considers that such complexity is an important issue to take into account when deciding improvements and simplifications;
ugotavlja, da je velik delež ocenjene stopnje napak mogoče pripisati napakam pri upravičenosti in hujšemu nespoštovanju pravil za javna naročila; ugotavlja tudi, da samo nespoštovanje pravil za javna naročila povzroči 43 % vseh količinsko opredeljivih napak in predstavlja približno tri četrtine ocenjene stopnje napak;
Notes that a major proportion of the estimated error rate is attributable to eligibility errors and serious failures to respect public procurement rules; further notes that the non-respect of public procurement rules alone accounts for 43 % of all quantifiable errors and forms approximately three-quarters of the estimated error rate;
ugotavlja, da kršenje postopkov za javna naročila razkriva neuspeh pri dokončni vzpostavitvi notranjega trga Unije; poziva Komisijo in Računsko sodišče, naj pripravita forum za posvetovalni proces o metodologiji, ki bo uporabljena glede na resnost odkritih kršitev na področju javnih naročil;
Notes that infringements of procurement procedures reveal a failure to complete the Union internal market; asks the Commission and the Court of Auditors to set up a platform for the consultation process on methodology used with regard to the seriousness of the infringements detected in public procurement domain;
nadalje ugotavlja, da bo raznolikost interesov nedvomno vplivala na učinkovitost izvajanja kontrolnih obveznosti držav članic, saj zadeva tako odhodke Unije znotraj posameznih držav članic kot njihove nacionalne prispevke v proračun Unije;
Further notes that diversity of interests will, without doubt, have an influence on the effective implementation of the Member States’ control obligations in so far as Union expenditure within the respective Member State and national contributions to the Union budget from the respective Member State are concerned;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči razloge za nespoštovanje pravil za javna naročila in tesno sodeluje z državami članicami pri premagovanju odkritih težav;
Asks the Commission to analyse the reasons for those infringements of public procurement rules and to cooperate decisively with the Member States to overcome the difficulties identified;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo tudi precej pomanjkljivosti v razpisnih postopkih in postopkih za dodelitev pogodbe;
Is worried that the Court of Auditors also found a significant number of shortcomings in tendering and contracting procedures;
ugotavlja, da je bilo za najmanj 30 % napak, ki jih je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče, na voljo dovolj informacij, da bi lahko organi v državah članicah, pristojni za izvajanje operativnih programov, lahko odkrili in popravili napako, preden so odhodke potrdili Komisiji;
Notes that for at least 30 % of the errors found by the Court of Auditors sufficient information was available for the Member State authorities in charge of implementing the OPs to have detected and corrected the error prior to certifying the expenditure to the Commission;
verjame, da zaradi te ugotovitve nastajajo resni dvomi o učinkovitosti sistema, v katerem države članice nosijo glavno odgovornost za točnost prijavljenih odhodkov;
Believes that this finding seriously brings into question the efficiency of a system in which the Member States hold the main responsibility for the accuracy of the declared expenditure;
opozarja, da je preverjanje upravljanja bistveno orodje kontrole za preprečevanje nepravilnosti, in obžaluje, da je preverjanje, ki so ga izvedli organi za upravljanje v državah članicah za 11 od 16 operativnih programov, ki so bili predmet revizije, le delno spoštovalo regulativne zahteve;
Recalls that management verifications are key controls to prevent irregularities, and regrets that for 11 of the 16 OPs audited, the verifications carried out by managing authorities of the Member States were only partially compliant with the regulatory requirements;
ugotavlja, da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 na splošno le delno spoštovali revidirane ključne določbe regulativnega okvira;
Notes that, overall, the supervisory and control systems for the 2007-2013 programming period were only partially in compliance with the audited key provisions of the regulatory framework;
je seznanjen, da se končne številke lahko določijo samo za tista proračunska leta, za katera se meni, da so zaključena, in da je 2004 zadnje proračunsko leto, za katero se meni, da je zaključeno;
Notes that final figures can only be established for those financial years that can be deemed to have been closed, and that the most recent financial year that can be deemed closed is 2004;
opozarja, da vloga Komisije vključuje zagotavljanje vodenja državam članicam in razvoj dobrih praks med nacionalnimi organi; poziva generalne direktorate Komisije, naj še izboljšajo svojo uspešnost na tem področju;
Recalls that the Commission's role includes providing guidance to the Member States and developing good practices among national bodies; calls on all Commission DGs to further improve their performance in this respect;
poudarja, da so upravni organi v državah članicah v veliki meri zainteresirane strani za politike, ki jih izvajajo z deljenim upravljanjem; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je deljeno upravljanje med Komisijo in državami članicami odvisno od vzdušja vzajemnega spoštovanja in priznavanja med zadevnimi upravnimi organi; poudarja, da se to vzdušje lahko v veliki meri še okrepi pri vsakodnevnem upravljanju in ustreznih stikih med Komisijo in javnimi upravami v državah članicah;
Stresses that the Member States’ administrations are, to a high degree, stakeholders of policies they implement in shared management; emphasises, in that respect, that shared management between the Commission and the Member States depends upon an atmosphere of mutual respect and recognition between the administrations concerned; underlines that this atmosphere, to a large degree, can be further strengthened in day-to-day management and resulting contacts between the Commission and the Member States’ administrations;
od Komisije zahteva, naj določi najboljšo prakso in jo razširi med državami članicami, da bi omogočila povečano črpanje sredstev in izboljšala denarni tok upravičencev s spremembo in poenostavitvijo strukturnih skladov, ki izvajajo predpise na nacionalni ravni;
Requests that the Commission identify and spread best practices amongst the Member States in order to allow an increased absorption of funds and improved beneficiary cash-flow by amending and simplifying the Structural Funds implementing regulations at national level;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker je po navedbah urada OLAF vse več dokazov, da so goljufije v strukturnih skladih v številnih primerih organizirane in načrtovane ter da ne gre zgolj za izkoriščanje priložnosti; poziva vse zainteresirane strani v državah članicah in v institucijah Unije, naj tesno sodelujejo pri odpravljanju tega pojava (letno poročilo OLAF 2010, str.
Is worried that according to OLAF there is growing evidence that in many cases the frauds in the Structural Funds are organised and planned and have not resulted from simple opportunity; calls on all stakeholders in the Member States and in the Union institutions to work together closely to deal with this phenomenon (OLAF Annual Report 2010, p.
obžaluje, da so bili letni povzetki držav članic o strukturnih skladih objavljeni pozno, zaradi česar ni mogoče pridobiti ustreznega zagotovila o rednem izvajanju regionalnih programov; ocenjuje, da je to zadostna podlaga za ustavitev izplačil iz strukturnih skladov EU državam članicam;
Deplores the belated issuing of the Member States’ annual summaries concerning the Structural Funds, on account of which it is impossible to obtain an adequate assurance of the regularity of the implementation of regional programmes; regards this as sufficient grounds to suspend payments from the Structural Funds to the Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi z revizijo finančne uredbe preuči učinkovitost obveznih nacionalnih izjav kot pobud in/ali sredstev odvračanja, ter prednosti in izboljšanja, ki bi jih lahko prispevale za dobro finančno poslovodenje; meni, da bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi dejstvo, da je v obdobju 2007–2013 prišlo do večjih sprememb v sistemih poslovodenja in nadzora in da je treba za nadaljnje izboljševanje oceniti dosežke; zagovarja stališče, da bi morala uvedba tega instrumenta Komisiji resnično omogočiti izpolnjevanje njenih dolžnosti v zvezi z nadzorom držav članic in zagotavljanja uspešnega delovanja nacionalnih sistemov upravljanja in nadzora;
Invites the Commission, in connection with the revision of the Financial Regulation, to look into the effectiveness of NMDs as incentives and/or deterrents and the advantages and improvements they could bring in terms of sound financial management; considers that account should also be taken of the fact that for the period 2007-2013 major changes have been made to management and control systems and that the results produced need to be assessed with a view to making further improvements; takes the view that the introduction of this instrument should genuinely make it possible for the Commission to fulfil its duty to supervise the Member States and to ensure an effective functioning of the national management and control systems;
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi stike z upravnimi organi v državah članicah zaradi vzajemne izmenjave informacij, da se nemudoma obravnavajo odprta vprašanja;
Calls upon the Commission to intensify the contacts with the Member States’ administrations for the purpose of a mutual exchange of information to tackle pending questions without delay;
izraža resno zaskrbljenost zaradi vztrajno nizkega standarda sistemov upravljanja in kontrole v nekaterih državah članicah ter počasnega napredka pri izboljšanju teh sistemov;
Is very worried about the continually low standard of some Member States’ management and control systems and the slow rate of progress in improving those systems;
poziva Komisijo, naj v finančno uredbo vključi zahtevo po obveznih nacionalnih izjavah o upravljanju, ki se izdajo in podpišejo na ravni ministrstev, njihovo revizijo pa opravi neodvisen revizor, kar bo prvi odločilen korak k večji nacionalni odgovornosti za odhodke Unije; zagovarja stališče, da brez uvedbe tega instrumenta Komisija ne bo sposobna izpolnjevati svoje dolžnosti v zvezi z nadzorom držav članic in zagotavljanja uspešnega delovanja nacionalnih sistemov upravljanja in nadzora;
Invites the Commission to include in the Financial Regulation a request for mandatory NMDs issued and signed at ministerial level and duly audited by an independent auditor as a vital first step towards greater national accountability for Union expenditure; takes the view that without introducing this instrument the Commission will not be able to fulfil its duty to supervise the Member States and to ensure an effective functioning of the national management and control systems;
opozarja na svoj poslovnik, zlasti člen 6(3) Priloge VI, v skladu s katerim lahko predsednik na podlagi poročila odbora, pristojnega za proračunski nadzor ’v skladu s členom 232 Pogodbe ES v imenu Parlamenta vloži tožbo pri Sodišču proti zadevni instituciji zaradi neizpolnjevanja obveznosti, izhajajočih iz pripomb, ki spremljajo sklepe o razrešnici, ali iz drugih resolucij v zvezi z izvrševanjem odhodkov’; prav tako spominja, da je treba zagotoviti učinkovito izvajanje rednih, tristranskih srečanj v okviru proračunskega postopka, kakor je navedeno v členu 324 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Draws attention to its Rules of Procedure, in particular to Annex VI, Article 6(3) thereof, according to which the President on ’the basis of a report by the committee responsible for budgetary control...acting on behalf of Parliament may bring an action before the Court of Justice against...the institution concerned, pursuant to Article 265 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, for failure to comply with the obligations deriving from the comments accompanying the discharge decision or the other resolutions concerning implementation of expenditure’; recalls, in addition, the need to ensure an efficient implementation of regular, tripartite meetings under the budgetary procedure as mentioned in Article 324 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
obžaluje, da certifikacijski organi v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
Regrets that the certifying bodies under Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
nimajo enotnih in jasnih revizijskih standardov; poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj z državami članicami ustanovi delovno skupino, ki bi pripravila enotne revizijske standarde, s katerimi bi dodatno izboljšali revizijsko delo certifikacijskih/revizijskih organov;
lack coherent and clear auditing standards; calls on the Commission to set up a working group with the Member States to prepare uniform auditing standards in order to further enhance the audit work of the certifying/auditing bodies;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu sporoči število in oceno trdnosti obstoječih organov za upravljanje;
Calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with the number and an assessment of the soundness of the existing managing authorities;
Raziskave, energetika in promet – 8 000 000 000 EUR
Research, energy and transport - EUR 8 000 000 000
opozarja, da večino odhodkov za to skupino politik izvršuje Komisija z neposrednim centraliziranim upravljanjem, vse pogosteje pa tudi agencije in skupna podjetja s posrednim centraliziranim upravljanjem;
Recalls that the majority of expenditure for this policy group is implemented by the Commission under direct centralised management and, increasingly, by indirect centralised management through agencies and Joint Undertakings;
ugotavlja, da je po ocenah Računskega sodišča najverjetnejša stopnja napak na tem političnem področju med 2 % in 5 %;
Notes that the most likely error rate estimated by the Court of Auditors for this policy area is between 2 % and 5 %;
je seznanjen tudi z ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča, da so bili sistemi upravljanja in nadzora pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti transakcij le delno učinkoviti;
Further notes that the Court of Auditors found that management and control systems were only partially effective in ensuring the regularity of transactions;
ugotavlja, da je glavni vir napak v tej skupini politik še zmeraj povračilo previsoko prijavljenih stroškov dela in posrednih stroškov raziskovalnih projektov; poleg tega je seznanjen s povečanjem pridržkov glede neposrednega upravljanja (s 4 na 9), zlasti zaradi zapletenih meril za upravičenost;
Notes that the main source of error in this policy group remains the reimbursement of overstated personnel and indirect costs to research projects; further takes note of the increase in reservations concerning direct management (from 4 to 9) mainly as a result of complex eligibility criteria;
ugotavlja tudi, da so napake na tem področju zaradi posebnega pomena raziskav in razvoja za gospodarstvo Unije še posebej zaskrbljujoče;
Also notes that, in view of the particular importance of research and development for the Union economy, errors in this area are especially alarming;
opozarja, da izkaze stroškov, ki so jih upravičenci 6. okvirnega programa predložili z namenom povračila stroškov, spremlja revizijsko potrdilo, ki ga izda neodvisni revizor, v njem pa potrjuje, da ima neodvisni revizor razumno zagotovilo, da prijavljeni stroški izpolnjujejo zahteve za upravičenost; želi pritegniti pozornost na dejstvo, da je Komisija priznala, da so merila sprejemljivosti, ki jih je določila za pridobitev potrditve, prestroga;
Recalls that FP6 beneficiaries’ cost statements submitted for reimbursement shall be accompanied by an audit certificate issued by an independent auditor certifying that the independent auditor has reasonable assurance that the declared costs meet the eligibility requirements; draws attention to the fact that, by the Commission's own admission, the acceptability criteria adopted for obtaining certification are too restrictive;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi dejstva, da je Računsko sodišče tako v letu 2009 kot v letu 2008 odkrilo napake v 43 % pregledanih izkazov stroškov, za katere je revizor pred predložitvijo za povračilo stroškov izdal potrdilo z mnenjem brez pridržka;
Is worried about the fact that the Court of Auditors found errors in 43 % of the audited cost statements - both in 2009 as well as in 2008 - which had received an unqualified opinion from the certifying auditor before submission for reimbursement;