natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker mora biti čezmejno izvrševanje prednostna naloga na notranjem trgu, sodišča pa morajo biti sposobna hitro ukrepati za zamrznitev premoženja dolžnika ali domnevnega dolžnika; če takšne možnosti ni, lahko prevaranti in drugi, ki se namerno želijo izogniti obveznostim, premoženje prenesejo pod drugo jurisdikcijo, državljane in mala podjetja, ki so že pridobili sodno odločbo, pa prisilijo, da povrnitev premoženja zahtevajo na sodišču druge države članice,
whereas cross-border enforcement must be a priority in the internal market and courts must be able to act swiftly to order the freezing of the debtor's or alleged debtor's assets; whereas in the absence of such a facility rogue traders and others who deliberately seek to evade their responsibilities can move their assets to another jurisdiction, forcing citizens and small businesses who have already secured a court judgment to go before another Member State's courts in an effort to recover assets,
ker je glede na praktične težave, ki jih imajo v čezmejnih primerih upniki pri dostopanju do podatkov o dolžnikih v javnih ali zasebnih virih, potreben nalog za razkritje podatkov,
whereas an order for the disclosure of information about assets is required, given the practical difficulties creditors face in accessing information on debtors from public or private sources in a cross-border context,
ker naj bi zakonodajni ukrep, zahtevan v tej resoluciji, temeljil na podrobni oceni učinka, kot je zahteval Parlament,
whereas the legislative action requested in this resolution should be based on detailed impact assessments, as requested by Parliament,
ker naj bi bili podrobni podatki o postopkih za izvrševanje zahtevkov v vsaki državi članici dostopni prek portala evropskega e-pravosodja, ker bi bilo treba okrepiti sodelovanje med izvršilnimi organi držav članic, da bi pospešili izterjavo dolgov;
whereas detailed information on the procedures for enforcing claims in every Member State should be available through the European e-Justice portal; whereas cooperation between enforcement authorities in the Member States should be stepped up in order to speed up debt recovery,
ker bi morala predlagana orodja dopolnjevati veljavno pravo in pobude Unije, predvsem Direktivo 2011/7/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 o boju proti zamudam pri plačilih v trgovinskih poslih UL L 48, 23.2.2011, str.
whereas the instruments proposed should complement existing Union law and initiatives, in particular Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions OJ L 48, 23.2.2011, p.
, Uredbo (ES) št. 1896/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne12. decembra 2006 o uvedbi postopka za evropski plačilni nalog UL L 399, 30.12.2006, str.
, Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure OJ L 399, 30.12.2006, p.
, Uredbo (ES) št. 861/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str.
, Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p.
in portal evropskega e-pravosodja,
, and the European e-Justice portal,
ker bi morali biti instrumenti enostavni in omogočati izvajanje brez zamud in nepotrebnih stroškov; ker morajo biti na voljo, kjer je to mogoče,
whereas the instruments should be simple and should avoid delay and unnecessary expense; whereas they must be available where appropriate
in imeti učinek presenečenja; ker bi bilo treba ustrezno zaščititi pravice dolžnikov in domnevnih dolžnikov, da se prepreči vsakršno zlorabo zahtevanih ukrepov,
, with ’surprise effect’; whereas debtors’ and alleged debtors’ rights should be correspondingly safeguarded in order to avoid any misuse of the measures requested,
zahteva, naj Komisija na podlagi člena 81(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije Parlamentu hitro predloži zakonodajne predloge ukrepov za zamrznitev in razkritje sredstev dolžnikov in domnevnih dolžnikov v čezmejnih primerih, v skladu s priloženimi podrobnimi priporočili;
Requests the Commission swiftly to submit to Parliament, on the basis of Article 81(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, legislative proposals on measures for the freezing and disclosure of debtors’ and alleged debtors’ assets in cross-border cases, following the detailed recommendations below;
meni, da zahtevani predlog ne bo imel finančnih posledic za proračun Unije;
Considers that the requested proposal does not have financial implications for the Union budget;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in priložena podrobna priporočila posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the accompanying detailed recommendations to the Commission and the Council.
Ukrep Unije naj bo v obliki uredbe.
The form of Union action should be that of a regulation.
Oba instrumenta naj bosta samostojni sredstvi, poleg tistih, ki so že na voljo v nacionalni zakonodaji.
Both instruments should be free-standing remedies additional to those available under national law.
Uporabljata naj se le v čezmejnih primerih.
They should apply only in cross-border cases.
Evropski parlament meni, da bi morala zahtevana instrumenta vsebovati enotna pravila o pristojnosti, ki bodo opredeljevala, katera nacionalna sodišča so pristojna za njihovo izdajo.
The European Parliament considers that the requested instruments should contain uniform jurisdictional rules specifying which national courts are competent to issue them.
Ta enotna pravila bi morala upoštevajo dejstvo, da je na splošno najboljše, če naloge obravnava sodišče s stvarno pristojnostjo po Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah (UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
Those uniform rules should take into account the fact that the court having substantive jurisdiction under Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
Priporočilo 3 (o pristojnosti za obravnavo ugovorov zoper izdajo nalogov)
Recommendation 3 (on jurisdiction to hear oppositions to the orders)
Če je ugovor podan zoper učinek naloga v posamezni državi članici, ki ni država, v kateri se nahaja sodišče, ki je začelo postopek za izdajo naloga, bi se lahko takšno pravilo spremenilo s podelitvijo pristojnosti tudi sodiščem tiste države članice, v kateri se premoženje nahaja, da bi tako zaščitili dolžnike, domnevne dolžnike in tretje stranke.
Where the opposition is to the effect of an order in a specific Member State other than the one of the initiating court, this rule could be tempered, in order to protect debtors, alleged debtors and third parties, by also conferring jurisdiction on the courts of the Member State in which the assets are located.
V zahtevanih instrumentih bi bilo treba izčrpno navesti podlago za ugovor zoper naloga.
The grounds for opposition to the orders should be listed exhaustively in the instruments requested.
Priporočilo 4 (o standardnem obrazcu za zahtevo za izdajo nalogov in o poročanju)
Recommendation 4 (on the standard form for requesting the orders and on reporting)
Standardizirati bi bilo treba tudi sporočila o izvršbi nalogov (v primeru evropskega naloga za ohranitev premoženja: na primer odgovor banke izvršilnemu organu o uspešnosti zaplembe, obveščanju dolžnika itd.).
Communication should also be standardised in connection with the execution of the orders (e.g. in the case of the EOPA: the response of the bank to the enforcement authority as to the success of the attachment, the notification of the debtor, etc.).
Komisija bi morala biti dolžna poročati o izvajanju zahtevanih instrumentov, zlasti o njihovem uresničevanju.
The Commission should be under an obligation to report on the implementation of the requested instruments and, in particular, on their uptake.
Evropski parlament meni, da je bistveno, da se lahko evropski nalog za ohranitev premoženja pridobi
The European Parliament is of the opinion that it is essential to be able to obtain an EOPA
, ne da bi bilo treba stranko, na premoženje katere se nanaša, o tem na začetku obvestiti.
, that is, without initial notice being served on the party whose assets are concerned.
Nalog bi moral biti na voljo pred, med in po glavni obravnavi.
The order should be available before, during, and after the main proceedings.
Poleg tega, bi moral dokazno breme nositi tožnik, ki mora predstaviti zadostne dokaze (
Furthermore, the burden of proof should be on the claimant to make a good prima facie case (
) in dokazati nujnost (
) and to establish urgency (
Nacionalna sodišča bi morala ta merila presojati na podlagi obstoječe sodne prakse Sodišča.
These criteria should be assessed by national courts on the basis of the existing case-law of the Court of Justice.
Če je nalog pridobljen pred sodno odločbo, s katero je ugotovljen dolg, kar je najbolj pogosto, bi moral biti izvršljiv po vsej EU ob upoštevanju minimalnih nujnih vmesnih ukrepov.
If the order has been obtained prior to a judgment establishing a debt, as is most often the case, it should be enforceable throughout the EU subject to minimal necessary intermediate measures.
Če pa je nalog pridobljen po sodni odločbi, s katero je ugotovljen dolg, potem bi moral biti izvršljiv po vsej EU brez vsakršnih vmesnih ukrepov.
By contrast, if the order has been obtained after a judgment establishing a debt, then it should be enforceable throughout the EU without any intermediate measures being required.
Evropski parlament meni, da bi lahko zahtevani instrument vključeval obsežen nabor ukrepov za varovanje dolžnikov in domnevnih dolžnikov:
The European Parliament considers that the requested instrument should include a comprehensive set of safeguards for debtors and alleged debtors:
Kadar se za izdajo evropskega naloga za ohranitve premoženja zaprosi pred sodno odločbo, s katero se ugotovi obstoj dolga, bi morala biti izdaja odvisna od varščine in drugih jamstev, ki jih sodišče, na katerem se je postopek začel, po lastni presoji zahteva od tožnika, da se toženi stranki ali kakršni koli tretji stranki nadomesti vso nastalo škodo.
When requested prior to a judgment establishing a debt, the granting of an EOPA should be conditional on the claimant providing security or other guarantees at the discretion of the initiating court, in order to compensate the defendant and any third parties for any damage suffered.
Tožena stranka bi morala imeti možnost, da se evropski nalog za ohranitev premoženja po predložitvi varščine razveljavi.
The defendant should be able to terminate the EOPA by providing security.
Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da te določbe ne preprečujejo dostopa tistim z omejenimi finančnimi sredstvi.
Member States should ensure that these provisions do not constitute a barrier to access for those with limited financial means.
Če je evropski nalog za ohranitev premoženja izdan brez obvestila (
If an EOPA is granted without notice (
), potem bi bilo treba toženo stranko uradno obvestiti in ji nemudoma po izvršbi zagotoviti vse podatke, potrebne za pripravo ugovora zoper nalog.
), the defendant should be notified formally and given all information required to prepare an opposition to the order without delay after execution.
Tožena stranka bi morala biti upravičena, da predloži naknadni (
The defendant should have a right to submit an
) ugovor zoper evropski nalog za ohranitev premoženja.
opposition to an EOPA.
Podlaga za tak ugovor bi se morala uskladiti v zahtevanem instrumentu.
Grounds for such an opposition should be harmonised in the requested instrument.
Prav tako bi se v instrumentu morala uskladiti pristojnost za obravnavo takega ugovora.
Jurisdiction to hear such an opposition should also be harmonised in the instrument.
Za evropski nalog za ohranitev premoženja bi bilo treba določiti jasen časovni okvir.
A clear time frame should be set for the EOPA.
Zlasti če se glavni postopek še ni začel, bi moralo časovno omejitev za to določiti sodišče, ki izda nalog.
In particular, if main proceedings have not yet been brought, a time-limit for so doing should be set by the issuing court.
Instrument bi moral tudi ustrezno upoštevati raznolikost nacionalnih praks glede ekonomskih težav dolžnikov, vključno z obstoječimi omejitvami, pod katerimi ni mogoče zapleniti premoženja na bančnem računu fizične osebe.
The instrument should take due account of the diversity of practices at domestic level concerning debtor hardship, including existing thresholds below which the bank account of a natural person cannot be attached.
Ta vprašanja bi bilo zato treba obravnavati po pravu države članice, v kateri ima dolžnik ali domnevni dolžnik stalno prebivališče.
Such matters should therefore be left to the law of the debtor's or alleged debtor's Member State of habitual residence.
Da bi povečale pravno varnost za upnike, bi morale države članice Komisiji posredovati podatke o obstoju takih izjem, ki bi se objavili.
However, to increase legal certainty for creditors, Member States should be under an obligation to communicate to the Commission information on the existence of such exemptions, which would be made public.
V evropskem nalogu za ohranitev premoženja bi moralo biti določeno, da ga upnik izvršuje na lastno odgovornost in da je lahko odgovoren za nadomestilo vse škode, ki bi zaradi izvršilnih ukrepov nastala dolžniku.
The EOPA should stipulate that the creditor enforces an EOPA at his own risk and may be liable to compensate the debtor for any damage suffered as a result of the enforcement measures.
Evropski parlament prav tako meni, da bi morala vsaka država članica odločiti, kateri organ ali organi so pristojni, da začnejo s postopkom za evropski nalog za razkritje premoženja.
The European Parliament further considers that each Member State should be required to decide which authority or authorities are competent to initiate an EODA.
Takšen nalog bi moral biti izvršljiv po vsej EU, ne da bi bili za to potrebni kakršni koli vmesni ukrepi.
Such an order should be enforceable throughout the EU without any intermediate measures being required.
Evropski parlament meni, da bi moral zahtevani instrument vključevati obsežen nabor ukrepov za varovanje dolžnikov:
The European Parliament considers that the requested instrument should include a comprehensive set of safeguards for debtors:
Instrument bi moral vzpostaviti ustrezno ravnovesje med pravico do varstva osebnih podatkov, ki jo zagotavlja Direktiva 95/46/ES in kot je zapisana v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, in učinkovitim izvrševanjem sodnih odločb.
The instrument should strike an appropriate balance between the right to the protection of personal data, as guaranteed by Directive 95/46/EC and as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and the effective enforcement of judgments.
Zlasti bi bilo treba vzpostaviti ukrepe za zaščito podatkov, razkritih zaradi evropskega naloga za razkritje premoženja, in preprečiti njihovo zlorabo.
In particular, safeguards should be put in place to protect the information disclosed as a result of an EODA and to prevent its misuse.
V evropskem nalogu za razkritje premoženja bi moralo biti določeno, da ga upnik izvršuje na lastno odgovornost in da je lahko odgovoren za nadomestilo vse škode, ki bi dolžniku nastala zaradi razkritja.
The EODA should stipulate that the creditor enforces it at his own risk and may be liable to compensate the debtor for any damage suffered as a result of the disclosure.
Če je dolg v celoti odplačan, se mora evropski nalog za razkritje premoženja takoj razveljaviti, tudi na enostransko prošnjo dolžnika ob dokazilu o plačilu dolga.
Full payment of the debt must lead to the EODA being immediately set aside, including upon a unilateral application by the debtor providing proof that the debt has been settled.
Evropski parlament meni, da bi moral zahtevan instrument določiti okvir za sankcioniranje neskladnosti ali napačnih izjav, da bi se doseglo učinkovito in enotno izpolnjevanje naloga na celotnem območju svobode, varnosti in pravice.
The European Parliament considers that the requested instrument should set out a framework of penalties for non-compliance or false statements, in order to achieve effective and uniform compliance with the order throughout the area of freedom, security and justice.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek III – Komisija ( SEK(2010)0963 – C7-0211/2010 – 2010/2142(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 10 May 2011 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009, Section III – Commission ( SEC(2010)0963 – C7-0211/2010 – 2010/2142(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009 UL L 69, 13.3.2009.
having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009 OJ L 69, 13.3.2009.
ob upoštevanju zaključnega letnega računa Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009 ( SEK(2010)0963 – C7-0211/2010 ) UL C 308, 12.11.2010, str.
having regard to the annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2009 ( SEC(2010)0963 – C7-0211/2010 ) OJ C 308, 12.11.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi sklepov o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2008 ( KOM(2010)0650 ) in delovnih dokumentov osebja Komisije, priloženih temu poročilu ( SEK(2010)1437 ) in ( SEK(2010)1438 ),
having regard to the Commission's report on the follow-up to the discharge for the 2008 financial year ( COM(2010)0650 ), and to the Commission staff working documents accompanying that report (( SEC(2010)1437 and SEC(2010)1438 )),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 2. junija 2010 ’Zbirno poročilo o dosežkih Komisije pri upravljanju v letu 2009’ ( KOM(2010)0281 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 2 June 2010 entitled ’Synthesis of the Commission's management achievements in 2009’ ( COM(2010)0281 ),
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Komisije organu, pristojnemu za podelitev razrešnice, o notranjih revizijah, opravljenih leta 2009 ( KOM(2010)0447 ), in delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije, ki je priložen temu poročilu ( SEK(2010)0994 ),
having regard to the Commission's annual report to the discharge authority on internal audits carried out in 2009 ( COM(2010)0447 ), and to the Commission staff working document accompanying that report ( SEC(2010)0994 )),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o odgovorih držav članic na poročilo Računskega sodišča za leto 2009 ( KOM(2011)0104 ),
having regard to the Commission's report on Member States’ replies to the Court of Auditors’ 2009 annual report ( COM(2011)0104 ),
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2009 z odgovori institucij UL C 303, 9.11.2010, str.
having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2009, together with the institutions’ replies OJ C 303, 9.11.2010, p.
in posebnih poročil Računskega sodišča,
, and to the Court of Auditors’ special reports,
ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti računovodskih izkazov ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij, ki jo je Evropsko računsko sodišče pripravilo v skladu s členom 287 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije UL C 308, 12.11.2010, str.
having regard to the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ C 308, 12.11.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. maja 2010 ’Več ali manj kontrol?
having regard to the Commission communication of 26 May 2010 entitled ’More or less controls?
Vzpostavitev pravega ravnovesja med upravnimi stroški kontrole in tveganjem napake’ ( KOM(2010)0261 ) in delovnih dokumentov osebja Komisije, priloženih sporočilu ( SEK(2010)0640 ) in ( SEK(2010)0641 ),
Striking the right balance between the administrative costs of control and the risk of error’ (COM (2010)0261), and to the Commission staff working documents accompanying that communication ( SEC(2010)0640 and ( SEC(2010)0641 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o zaključnem računu evropskih šol za proračunsko leto 2009 z odgovori šol,
having regard to the report of the Court of Auditors on the annual accounts of the European Schools for the financial year 2009 together with the Schools’ replies,
ob upoštevanju priporočil Sveta z dne 15. februarja 2011 o podelitvi razrešnice Komisiji glede izvrševanja proračuna za proračunsko leto 2009 (05891/2011 – C7-0053/2011 ),
having regard to the Council's recommendation of 15 February 2011 on discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2009 (05891/2011 – C7-0053/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 274, 275 in 276 Pogodbe ES, člena 17(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, členov 317, 318 in 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter členov 179a in 180b Pogodbe Euratom,
having regard to Articles 274, 275 and 276 of the EC Treaty, Article 17(1) of the Treaty on European Union, Articles 317, 318 and 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Articles 179a and 180b of the Euratom Treaty,
, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1995/2006 z dne 13. decembra 2006 UL L 390, 30.12.2006, str.
as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 of 13 December 2006 OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p.
, zlasti s členi 55,145, 146 in 147 te uredbe,
, and in particular Articles 55,145, 146 and 147 thereof,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenj drugih zadevnih odborov ( A7-0134/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the other committees concerned ( A7-0134/2011 ),
ker Komisija v skladu s členom 17(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji izvršuje proračun in upravlja programe, v skladu s členom 317 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pa to počne na lastno odgovornost, pri čemer sodeluje z državami članicami in upošteva načelo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja,
whereas under Article 17(1) of the Treaty on European Union the Commission shall execute the budget and manage programmes and shall do so, under Article 317 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in cooperation with the Member States on its own responsibility, having regard to the principle of sound financial management,
podeli Komisiji razrešnico glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009;
Grants the Commission discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009;
navaja svoje pripombe v resoluciji, ki je sestavni del sklepov o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek III – Komisija in izvajalske agencije, in v svoji resoluciji z dne 10. maja 2011 o zaključkih glede posebnih poročil, ki jih je v okviru razrešnice Komisiji za leto 2009 izdalo Računsko sodišče Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0195 .
Sets out its observations in the resolution that forms an integral part of the Decisions on discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2009, Section III – Commission and executive agencies, and in its resolution of 10 May 2011 on the Court of Auditors’ special reports in the context of the 2009 Commission discharge Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0195 .