natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči medsebojno vplivanje – in vzpostavi večjo sinergijo – med Direktivo 2005/36/ES o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij, bolonjskim procesom v visokem šolstvu in københavnskim procesom za poklicno izobraževanje in usposabljanje, z boljšo uporabo evropskega ogrodja kvalifikacij, evropskega sistema kreditnih točk v poklicnem izobraževanju in usposabljanju (ECVET) ter Europassa; meni, da bi morale države članice ohraniti pristojnost za organizacijo svojih izobraževalnih sistemov v skladu s svojimi družbenimi in kulturnimi razmerami;
Calls on the Commission to examine the interaction – and establish closer synergies – between Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications, the Bologna Process on higher education and the Copenhagen process on vocational education and training, with improved use of the European Qualifications Framework, the European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET) and Europass; maintains that Member States should retain competence in the organisation of their educational systems in accordance with their particular societal and cultural conditions;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej podpira in dosledno izvaja potrjevanje kakovosti, ki je bistveno za spodbujanje inovacijskih postopkov z vidika ukrepanja, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti, kot so postopki na priporočilo evropskega okvira za zagotavljanje kakovosti poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja (EQAVET) in instrumentov, oblikovanih v okviru københavnskega procesa, denimo Europass in evropsko ogrodje kvalifikacij; države članice pa poziva, naj poenostavijo postopke priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij iz drugih držav, tako da bo mogoče poklicne kompetence dokazati ne le na podlagi formalnih kvalifikacij, temveč tudi s poskusnimi dobami, praktičnim in teoretičnim testiranjem ter strokovnimi ocenami;
Calls on the Commission to continue to support and consistently implement quality certification that gives a fundamental boost to innovation processes in terms of action, efficiency and effectiveness, such as those recommended in the European Quality Assurance in VET Network (EQAVET) and the instruments developed through the Copenhagen process, such as the Europass and the European Qualifications Framework (EQF); calls on the Member States to simplify the procedures for recognising foreign professional qualifications so as to ensure that job skills can be demonstrated not just on the strength of formal qualifications, but also by means of probationary periods, theoretical and practical examinations, and expert assessments;
meni, da izzivi, ki jih postavljata københavnski proces in strategija EU 2020, zahtevajo ustrezna finančna sredstva, tudi iz strukturnih skladov, zlasti Evropskega socialnega sklada, ter večje spodbujanje poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja s konkretnimi ukrepi ter vključitvijo novih modelov in metod usposabljanja, na primer z objavo zgodb o uspehu študentov na trgu dela, oglaševanjem ugleda poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja v večjih podjetjih ter zagotavljanjem boljših informacij in smernic o poklicnem izobraževanju in usposabljanju pred zaključkom obveznega šolanja; meni, da bi bilo zelo koristno spodbujati izmenjave izkušenj s podpornimi programi in bivanjem v tujini, denimo sodelovanje v programu Leonardo da Vinci;
Takes the view that the challenges posed by the Copenhagen process and the EU 2020 strategy call for the provision of adequate financial resources, inter alia through the Structural Funds, in particular the ESF, and for fuller involvement in promoting high-quality VET through concrete action and the inclusion of new models and methods of training, such as giving visibility to student success stories in the labour market, advertising the prestige attached to VET in major companies and providing fuller information and guidelines on VET matters prior to the completion of mandatory schooling; notes that encouraging exchanges of experience regarding support programmes and periods spent abroad, such as participation in the Leonardo da Vinci Programme, would be of great value;
poziva države članice, naj poenostavijo postopek priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij iz tujih držav, ki ne bo omogočal dokazovanja poklicnih usposobljenosti samo z uradnim potrdilom, ampak tudi s poskusnim delom, praktičnimi in teoretičnimi testiranji ter izvedenskim mnenjem;
Calls on the Member States to simplify the procedures for recognising foreign professional qualifications so as to ensure that job skills can be demonstrated not just on the strength of formal qualifications, but also by means of probation, theoretical and practical examinations, and expert assessment;
poziva k spodbujanju meddržavnega sodelovanja med državami članicami in tretjimi državami, da bi vzpostavili programe za izmenjavo primerov dobre prakse na področju poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja;
Calls for the promotion of transnational cooperation, both among EU Member States and third countries, in order to establish programmes for the exchange of best practices in the field of vocational education and training;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvaja sistem ocenjevanja učinkovitosti usposabljanja, da bi dosegla in ohranila visoko stopnjo zaposlenosti;
Calls on the Commission to implement the training effectiveness assessment system in order to achieve and maintain a high employment rate;
poziva Komisijo in Evropski center za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja, naj v dokumente, ki bodo sledili sporočilu iz Brugesa o okrepljenem evropskem sodelovanju pri poklicnem izobraževanju in usposabljanju za obdobje 2011–2010, vključita načelo enakosti med spoloma, zlasti z zagotavljanjem dostopa do vseživljenjskega učenja, da bodo imele ženske in moški možnost za učenje v vseh življenjskih obdobjih, ter z bolj odprtim in prožnejšim dostopom do izobraževanja in usposabljanja;
Calls on the Commission and the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) to include the gender dimension in the follow-up to the Bruges Communiqué on Enhanced European Cooperation in Vocational Education and Training for the period 2011-2020, especially in terms of access to lifelong learning, so that women and men have opportunities to learn at any stage in life, and also by making routes into education and training more open and flexible;
poziva Komisijo, naj ustrezno prilagodi Evropski socialni sklad, celotni program vseživljenjskega učenja in program Erasmus za mlade podjetnike, da bodo povsod v EU zagotovljena sredstva za projekte za izobraževanje in usposabljanje, reševanje vprašanja brezposelnosti med mladimi ter dodatno izobraževanje in usposabljanje starejših, in da bo olajšan dostop do teh sredstev; poziva Komisijo, naj podpira programe Skupnosti za pomoč mladim pri pridobivanju znanja, spretnosti in izkušenj, ki jih potrebujejo pri iskanju prve zaposlitve;
Requests the Commission to make the necessary adjustments to the European Social Fund, the Lifelong Learning Programme as a whole, and Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs in order to ensure that funding for specific education and training projects, projects to tackle youth unemployment, and training schemes for older people can be allocated and made more readily accessible in all parts of the EU; calls on the Commission to support Community programmes to help young people to acquire the knowledge, skills and experience which they need in order to find their first job;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo optimalno uporabo strukturnih skladov, kot je Evropski socialni sklad, za posebne programe, ki spodbujajo vseživljenjsko učenje in udeležbo žensk v njem ter katerih cilj je večja udeležba žensk v sistemu poklicnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja, tudi z izvajanjem ustrezno financiranih usmerjenih ukrepov; poziva k razvoju posebnih ukrepov v okviru pilotnega projekta Erasmus za mlade podjetnike, da bi spodbudili podjetništvo med ženskami;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure optimal use of the Structural Funds, including the European Social Fund, for specific programmes that promote lifelong learning, encourage more women to participate in it and aim to increase the rate of female participation in the VET system, not least by means of suitably funded measures specifically designed to achieve this; calls for the development of specific actions under the Erasmus for Young Entrepreneurs pilot project to encourage entrepreneurship among women;
ponovno kritizira odločitev Sveta o zmanjšanju proračunskih sredstev za leto 2011 za glavne programe EU s področja izobraževanja (program za vseživljenjsko učenje in program People – za 25 milijonov EUR oziroma 100 milijonov EUR); ugotavlja, da je so velikopotezne zahteve iz strategije Evropa 2020 in proračunska stvarnost tako v precejšnjem nesorazmerju;
Reiterates its criticism of the cuts made by the Council of Ministers in the 2011 budget as regards funding for the main EU programmes in the education sphere (the Lifelong Learning programme and the People programme – cuts of EUR 25 million and EUR 100 million respectively); observes that the ambitious Europe 2020 strategy is thus clearly out of step with the reality of budgetary constraints;
poziva države članice, naj preučijo možnost uvedbe sistema bonov, da bi usposabljanje omogočile tudi osebam z nižjimi dohodki; poziva države članice, naj po potrebi zaprosijo za financiranje iz teh sistemov bonov v sklopu Evropskega socialnega sklada;
Calls on the Member States to consider as one option a training voucher scheme to secure for people with a low income the possibility of participating in training; if necessary, invites Member States to apply for funding for such training voucher schemes under the ESF;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. junija 2011 o BDP in več – merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja ( 2010/2088(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 8 June 2011 on GDP and beyond – Measuring progress in a changing world ( 2010/2088(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o BDP in več – merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja z dne 20. avgusta 2009 ( KOM(2009)0433 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 20 August 2009 on GDP and Beyond – Measuring progress in a changing world ( COM(2009)0433 ),
ob upoštevanju konference o preseganju BDP, ki so jo organizirali Parlament, Komisija, Rimski klub, Svetovni sklad za naravo (WWF) in Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) novembra 2007 v Bruslju,
having regard to the ‘Beyond GDP Conference’ organised by Parliament, the Commission, the Club of Rome, the WWF and the OECD in November 2007 in Brussels,
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o merjenju gospodarske uspešnosti in družbenega napredka (Stiglitzevo poročilo), ki je bilo predstavljeno 14. septembra 2009,
having regard to the report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (Stiglitz Report), presented on 14 September 2009,
ob upoštevanju globalne pobude z naslovom Ekonomika ekosistemov in biotska raznovrstnost (TEEB), ki so jo junija 2007 predlagali voditelji skupine držav G8 in še voditelji petih drugih držav, ter njenih rezultatov, objavljenih v letih 2009 in 2010,
having regard to the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) global initiative endorsed by G8+5 leaders in June 2007 and its results published in 2009 and 2010,
ob upoštevanju Sternovega poročila o ekonomiki podnebnih sprememb, ki je bilo objavljeno 30. oktobra 2006,
having regard to the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change published on 30 October 2006,
ob upoštevanju istanbulske deklaracije, podpisane na drugem svetovnem forumu OECD o statistiki, znanju in politiki z dne 30. junija 2007,
having regard to the Istanbul Declaration signed during the 2nd OECD World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge and Policy on 30 June 2007,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dni 10. in 11. decembra 2009, 25. in 26. marca 2010 in 17. junija 2010,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 10 and 11 December 2009, 25 and 26 March 2010 and 17 June 2010,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o statistiki (Ekonomske in finančne zadeve) z dne 10. novembra 2009,
having regard to the Council conclusions of 10 November 2009 (Economic and Financial Affairs) on Statistics,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2009 (okolje) o ekološko učinkovitem gospodarstvu v okviru lizbonske agende po letu 2010 in strategije EU za trajnostni razvoj,
having regard to the Council conclusions of 23 October 2009 (Environment) on Eco-Efficient Economy in the context of the post-2010 Lisbon Agenda and the EU Sustainable Development Strategy,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za uredbo o evropskih okoljsko-gospodarskih računih ( KOM(2010)0132 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal for a Regulation on European Environmental Economic Accounts (COM (2010)0132),
ob upoštevanju integriranih smernic strategije EU 2020 za evropske politike na področju gospodarstva in zaposlovanja, ki jih je Komisija predlagala 27. aprila 2010,
having regard to the EU 2020 integrated guidelines for European economic and employment policies, proposed by the Commission on 27 April 2010,
ob upoštevanju sporočil o evropski upravi: Boljša priprava zakonodaje ( KOM(2002)0275 ), Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0689 ), Drugi strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2008)0032 ) in Tretji strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2009)0015 ),
having regard to the Communications on European Governance: Better lawmaking ( COM(2002)0275 ), A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union ( COM(2006)0689 ), A second strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union ( COM(2008)0032 ) and A third strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union ( COM(2009)0015 ),
ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta za trajnostno potrošnjo in proizvodnjo ( KOM(2008)0397 ),
having regard to the EU's Sustainable Consumption and Production Action Plan (COM (2008)0397),
ob upoštevanju obstoječih statističnih instrumentov kot so Statistika Evropske unije o dohodkih in življenjskih pogojih, anketa o delovni sili, raziskave Eurobarometra, anketa o evropskih vrednotah in Evropski družbeni pregled,
having regard to existing statistical instruments, such as the EU-SILC, the Labour Force Survey (LFS), Eurobarometers, the European Values Survey and the European Social Survey (ESS),
ob upoštevanju evropske raziskave o kakovosti življenja, ki jo vodi Eurofund in zagotavlja celostno sliko o kakovosti življenja in življenjskih pogojih v evropskih državah (za vse države članice EU in njene kandidatke) z več kot 120 kazalniki s primerjalnimi podatki med državami Raziskava o kakovosti življenja pokriva bistvena področja pojma kakovosti življenja: gospodarski viri, prikrajšanje; zdravje in dostop do zdravstvene nege; zaposlovanje in kakovost delovnih mest; ravnovesje med delom in zasebnim življenjem; družinski odnosi in podpora; socialna vključenost/izključenost (življenje v skupnosti in družbena udeležba); izobraževanje in usposabljanje; kakovost stanovanj in lokalno okolje; družbeni kapital in kakovost družbe; kakovost javnih storitev; subjektivna blaginja (vključno s srečo, zadovoljstvom z življenjem, optimizmom glede prihodnosti).
having regard to the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS), coordinated by Eurofound, which provides a comprehensive portrait of quality of life and living conditions in European Countries (covering all EU Member States and candidate countries) with over 120 indicators providing comparative data across countries EQLS covers the following core domains of the quality of life concept: economic resources, deprivation; health and access to health care; employment and job quality; work-life balance; family relations and support; social inclusion/exclusion (community life and social participation); education and training; quality of housing and local environment; social capital and quality of society; quality of public services; subjective well-being (including happiness, life satisfaction, optimism about the future).
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dni 10. marca UL C 349 E, 22.12.2010, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 10 March OJ C 349 E, 22.12.2010, p.
in 16. junija 2010 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0223 .
and 16 June 2010 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0223 .
o strategiji EU 2020, svoje resolucije z dne 8. oktobra 2009 UL C 230 E, 26.8.2010, str.
on the EU 2020 Strategy, its resolution of 8 October 2009 OJ C 230 E, 26.8.2010, p.
o srečanju na vrhu skupine G20 24. in 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu, svoje resolucije z dne 15. junija 2006 UL C 300 E, 9.12.2006, str.
on the Pittsburgh G-20 Summit of 24 and 25 September 2009, its resolution of 15 June 2006 OJ C 300 E, 9.12.2006, p.
o revidirani strategiji trajnostnega razvoja in svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2008 UL C 259 E, 29.10.2009, str.
on the revised sustainable development strategy and its resolution of 24 April 2008 OJ C 259 E, 29.10.2009, p.
o zeleni knjigi o tržnih instrumentih za namene okoljske politike in z njo povezanih politik,
on the Green Paper on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj odborov za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, za razvoj, za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0175/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Development, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0175/2011 ),
ker vse mednarodne ustanove vse bolj priznavajo, da je treba izboljšati podatke in kazalnike, ki bi dopolnjevali BDP pri merjenju celotnega družbenega razvoja,
whereas the need to improve data and indicators to complement GDP for overall societal development is increasingly recognised by all international institutions,
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije „BDP in več – merjenje napredka v svetu, ki se spreminja“ kot možno dopolnilno orodje, ki bi lahko pripomoglo k izboljšanju političnih analiz in razprav;
Welcomes the Commission Communication on ‘GDP and Beyond – Measuring Progress in a Changing World’ as a possible complementary tool to contribute to improved policy analysis and debates;
poudarja, da je BDP pokazatelj gospodarske tržne dejavnosti, ki je postal standardna referenca načrtovalcev politik po vsem svetu; poudarja, da je BDP merilo proizvodnega učinka in ne meri okoljske trajnosti, učinkovite rabe virov, socialne vključenosti ali družbenega napredka na splošno; nadalje poudarja, da je lahko zavajajoč v tem smislu, da sanacijske ukrepe po nekaterih nesrečah in naravnih katastrofah obravnava kot korist in ne kot strošek;
Stresses that GDP is an indicator of economic market activity that has become a standard benchmark used by policy-makers throughout the world; emphasises that GDP is a measure of production and does not measure environmental sustainability, resource efficiency, social inclusion and social progress in general; underlines furthermore that it can be misleading in the sense that remedial measures following certain incidents such as accidents and natural disasters are treated as a benefit instead of a cost;
opozarja, da poleg merjenja gospodarskega razvoja in produktivnosti obstajajo tudi drugi kazalniki, ki vplivajo na življenjski standard v državi in ga razlagajo, ki se do sedaj niso količinsko opredeljevali, čeprav ustrezni kazalniki obstajajo;
Notes that besides measuring economic development and productivity there are other indicators that influence and explain the living standards in a country and that have not been quantified until now although relevant indicators exist;
poudarja potrebo po oblikovanju dodatnih kazalnikov za merjenje srednje- in dolgoročnega gospodarskega in družbenega napredka; poziva k oblikovanju jasnih in merljivih kazalnikov, ki bodo upoštevali podnebne spremembe, biotsko raznovrstnost, učinkovitost rabe virov in socialno vključenost; poziva tudi k oblikovanju kazalnikov, ki se bodo bolj osredotočili na vidik ravni gospodinjstva in odražali dohodek, potrošnjo in bogastvo;
Stresses the need to develop additional indicators for measuring medium- and long-term economic and social progress; calls for the development of clear and measurable indicators that take account of climate change, biodiversity, resource efficiency and social inclusion; furthermore calls for the development of indicators that focus more closely on the household-level perspective, reflecting income, consumption and wealth;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za predstavitev indeksa obremenitve okolja, ki bi se ga predložilo poleg BDP in ki bo sprva zajemal naslednje glavne sklope okoljske politike: „podnebne spremembe in raba energije“, „narava in biotska raznovrstnost“, „onesnaževanje zraka in vplivi na zdravje“, „poraba vode in onesnaževanje“, „nastajanje odpadkov in raba virov“;
Welcomes the Commission initiative to present an index for environmental pressure, to be submitted alongside GDP, which will initially comprise the following major strands of environmental policy: ‘climate change and energy use’, ‘nature and biodiversity’, ‘air pollution and health impacts’, ‘water use and pollution’, ‘waste generation and use of resources’;
pričakuje, da bo preusmeritev pozornosti na širše in bolj trajnostne kazalnike privedla do bolj sistematične osredotočenosti na družbene in okoljske dejavnike v državah v razvoju, med drugim na podnebne spremembe, biotsko raznovrstnost, zdravstvo, izobraževanje in upravljanje, ter s tem omogočila razvojnim politikam, da se usmerijo na najbolj pomoči potrebne in prikrajšane skupine prebivalstva; poudarja, da bi takšni kazalniki morali biti primerljivi in skladni z obstoječimi svetovnimi pobudami, na primer indeksom človeškega razvoja pri Organizaciji Združenih narodov (ZN);
Expects that shifting attention towards broader and more sustainable indicators will lead also to more systematic focus on social and environmental factors in developing countries, including climate change, biodiversity, health, education and governance, and thereby enable development policies to target the most needy and disadvantaged populations; underlines that such indicators should be compatible and consistent with existing global initiatives, such as the UN Human Development Index;
poudarja potrebo po merjenju kakovosti življenja v družbah; meni, da obsega doseganje in ohranjanje kakovosti življenja pomembne in sporazumne dejavnike, kot so zdravje, izobraževanje, kultura, zaposlovanje, stanovanje, okoljski pogoji itd.; meni, da bi morali kazalnikom, ki merijo takšne dejavnike, pripisati večji pomen; predlaga, naj se v okviru nadaljnjega razvoja kvalitativnih in kvantitativni meritev nadgradijo kazalniki Evropske raziskave o kakovosti življenja, ki pokrivajo poglavitna področja kakovosti življenja;
Underlines the need to measure quality of life in societies; considers that achieving and sustaining quality of life involves important, consensual factors such as health, education, culture, employment, housing, environmental conditions etc.; takes the view that indicators which measure such factors should be assigned a greater role; suggests that the EQLS indicators, which cover the core domains of quality of life, are built upon in the further development of both qualitative and quantitative metrics;