natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe ESPG zagotoviti, da ESPG podpira ponovno vključevanje posameznih presežnih delavcev v zaposlovanje; nadalje poudarja, da bi morali ukrepi, financirani iz ESPG, voditi do dolgoročnih zaposlitev; ponovno poudarja, da pomoč iz ESPG ne sme nadomestiti ukrepov, za katere so odgovorna podjetja na osnovi nacionalne zakonodaje ali kolektivnih pogodb, pa tudi ne ukrepov za prestrukturiranje podjetij oziroma sektorjev;
Stresses that, in accordance with Article 6 of the EGF Regulation, it should be ensured that the EGF supports the reintegration of individual redundant workers into employment; further stresses that the EGF-financed measures should lead to long-term employment; reiterates that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements, nor measures restructuring companies or sectors;
ugotavlja, da so med informacijami o usklajenem svežnju prilagojenih storitev, za katere je predvideno financiranje iz ESPG, tudi informacije o njihovem dopolnjevanju z ukrepi, ki se financirajo iz Strukturnih skladov; ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj v svoja letna poročila vključi tudi primerjalno oceno teh podatkov;
Notes that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF includes information on the complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds; reiterates its call to the Commission to present a comparative evaluation of those data in its annual reports as well;
ugotavlja, da po večkratnih zahtevah Parlamenta proračun za leto 2011 prvič vsebuje sredstva za plačila v višini 47 608 950 EUR v proračunski vrstici ESPG 04 05 01; opozarja, da je bil ESPG ustanovljen kot ločen, poseben instrument z lastnimi cilji in roki;
Notes that following repeated requests from Parliament, for the first time the 2011 budget shows payment appropriations of EUR 47 608 950 on the EGF budget line 04 05 01; recalls that the EGF was created as a separate specific instrument with its own objectives and deadlines;
o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v skladu s točko 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (vloga EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault, Francija)
on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2009/019 FR/Renault from France)
Francija je 9. oktobra 2009 vložila vlogo za uporabo sredstev ESPG v zvezi s presežnimi delavci v podjetju Renault s.a.s. in pri njegovih sedmih dobaviteljih, z dodatnimi informacijami pa jo je dopolnila do 25. januarja 2011.
France submitted an application on 9 October 2009 to mobilise the EGF in respect of redundancies in the enterprise Renault s.a.s. and seven of its suppliers, and supplemented it by additional information up to 25 January 2011.
Komisija zato predlaga uporabo zneska 24 493 525 EUR.
The Commission, therefore, proposes to mobilise and amount of EUR 24 493 525.
Zato bi bilo treba uporabiti sredstva ESPG, da se zagotovi finančni prispevek za vlogo, ki jo je predložila Francija –
The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application submitted by France,
V okviru splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 se iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji uporabi znesek 24 493 525 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 24 493 525 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. decembra 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (prenovitev) ( KOM(2008)0229 – C6-0184/2008 – 2008/0090(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 December 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (recast) ( COM(2008)0229 – C6-0184/2008 – 2008/0090(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0229 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0229 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 255(2) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima je Komisija predložila svoj začetni predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0184/2008 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 255(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted its initial proposal to Parliament ( C6-0184/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in člena 15 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 15 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti členov 41 in 42 Listine,
having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in particular Articles 41 and 42 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov UL C 77, 29.3.2002, str.
having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ustavne zadeve, Odbora za peticije in Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0426/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, the Committee on Petitions and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0426/2011 ),
ker po mnenju posvetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije zadevni predlog ne vsebuje bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v njem opredeljene kot take, in ker je ta predlog, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih obstoječih besedil in te spremembe, zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb;
whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question does not include any substantive amendments other than those identified as such in the proposal and whereas, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts together with those amendments, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance
meni, da je postopek 2011/0073(COD) brezpredmeten, ker je bila vsebina predloga Komisije KOM(2011)0137 vključena v postopek 2008/0090(COD) ;
Considers that procedure 2011/0073(COD) has lapsed as a result of the incorporation into procedure 2008/0090(COD) of the contents of the Commission proposal ( COM(2011)0137 );
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission
Predlog uredbe Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije
regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council
o opredelitvi splošnih načel in omejitev, ki urejajo pravico do dostopa do dokumentov institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije
defining the general principles and limits governing the right of access to documents of Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies
Potrebne so številne bistvene spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije.
A number of substantive changes are to be made to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents.
Po začetku veljavnosti spremenjene Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) pravica do dostopa do dokumentov zajema vse institucije, organe, urade in agencije Unije, vključno z Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, zato so potrebne bistvene spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije
Following the entry into force of the amended Treaty on the European Union (TEU) and of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the right to access to documents covers all Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, including the European External Action Service, so that substantial changes are to be made to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents
, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati izkušnje iz začetnega izvajanja navedene uredbe ter relevantno sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
, whereby the experience of the initial implementation of that Regulation, as well as of the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, should be taken into account.
Javnost prispeva h krepitvi načela demokracije
Openness contributes to strengthening the principles of democracy
Pogodbe EU
EU Treaty
in v Evropski listini o temeljnih pravicah.
and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
spoštovanja temeljnih pravic, določenih v členu 6
respect for fundamental rights as laid down in Article 6
in v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah
and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Preglednost bi morala okrepiti tudi načelo dobrega upravljanja v institucijah, organih, uradih in agencijah Unije, kakor določata člen 41 Listine in člen 298 PDEU.
Transparency should also strengthen the principles of good administration in Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies as provided for by Article 41 of the Charter and by Article 298 TFEU.
Odprtost krepi zaupanje državljanov v institucije Unije, saj prispeva k njihovemu poznavanju postopkov odločanja v Uniji in svojih pravic v tem okviru.
Openness enhances citizens' trust in Union institutions because it contributes to their knowledge of the Union's decision-making process and their respective rights thereunder.
Odprtost prinaša tudi več preglednosti pri izvajanju upravnih in zakonodajnih postopkov;
Openness also entails more transparency in the implementation of administrative and legislative procedures.
S poudarjanjem normativnega pomena načela preglednosti ta uredba krepi kulturo pravne države v Uniji in zato prispeva tudi k preprečevanju kriminala in kriminalnega vedenja;
By emphasising the normative importance of the principle of transparency, this Regulation strengthens the Union's culture of the rule of law and therefore also contributes to the prevention of crime and criminal behaviour.
Splošna načela in omejitve iz razlogov javnega ali zasebnega interesa, ki veljajo za pravico javnosti do dostopa do dokumentov, so bila določena v Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001, ki se je začela uporabljati 3. decembra 2001.
The general principles and the limits on grounds of public or private interest governing the public right of access to documents have been laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, which became applicable on 3 December 2001.
Prva ocena izvajanja Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 je bila opravljena v poročilu, objavljenem 30. januarja 2004.
A first assessment of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 was made in a report published on 30 January 2004.
Namen te uredbe je čim bolj uresničiti pravico dostopa javnosti do dokumentov ter določiti splošna načela in
The purpose of this Regulation is to give the fullest possible effect to the right of public access to documents and to lay down the general principles and
takega dostopa v skladu s
such access in accordance with
členom 255(2) Pogodbe ES
Article 255(2) of the EC Treaty
v skladu s
such access in accordance with
členom 15(3) PDEU in v skladu s predpisi o odprtosti institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije, kakor so določeni v členu 15(1) PDEU
Article 15(3) TFEU and in accordance with the provisions on openness of the Union's institutions, bodies, offices and agencies as laid down in Article 15(1) TFEU.
Glede razkritja osebnih podatkov je treba vzpostaviti jasno razmerje med to uredbo in Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov.
With regard to the disclosure of personal data, a clear relationship should be established between this Regulation and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data.
Institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije bi morali osebne podatke obdelovati v skladu s pravicami posameznikov, na katere se osebni podatki nanašajo, kakor je opredeljeno v členu 16 PDEU, pa tudi v členu 8 Listine, ustrezni zakonodaji Unije in s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije.
Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies should treat personal data in compliance with the rights of data subjects as defined by Article 16 TFEU as well as by Article 8 of the Charter, by relevant Union law and by the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Določiti je treba jasna pravila glede razkrivanja dokumentov, ki izvirajo iz držav članic, in dokumentov tretjih strank, ki so del sodnih spisov ali so jih institucije
Clear rules should be established regarding the disclosure of documents originating from the Member States and of documents of third parties which are part of judicial proceedings files or obtained by the institutions
, organi, uradi ali agencije pridobili
, bodies, offices or agencies
zaradi svojih posebnih preiskovalnih pooblastil, ki jih imajo na podlagi prava
by virtue of specific powers of investigation conferred upon them by
V skladu s členom 15(3) PDEU se celovit
In compliance with Article 15(3) TFEU, full
dostop do dokumentov zagotovi, kadar
access should be granted to documents in cases where
Pripravljalni zakonodajni dokumenti in vse ustrezne informacije o različnih stopnjah medinstitucionalnega postopka, kot so dokumenti delovnih skupin Sveta in stališča delegacij držav članic v vlogi članic Sveta ter dokumenti trialoga na prvi obravnavi, bi morali biti načeloma javnosti nemudoma in neposredno dostopni na omrežju
Preparatory legislative documents and all related information on the different stages of the interinstitutional procedure, such as Council working group documents, names and positions of Member States' delegations acting as Members of the Council and first-reading trilogue documents, should in principle be made immediately and directly accessible to the public on the Internet
Zakonodajna besedila bi morala biti napisana jasno in razumljivo ter objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
Legislative texts should be drafted in a clear and understandable way and published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija bi se morali v skladu s členom 295 PDEU in to uredbo dogovoriti o boljši praksi pri pripravi zakonodaje, izboljšanih modelih in tehnikah, ki si jih delijo institucije, organi, uradi in agencije, da bi se v zasnovi izboljšalo načelo preglednosti in pravne jasnosti dokumentov Unije, in to objaviti v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, .
Better law-making practices, drafting models and techniques shared by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies should be agreed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in accordance with Article 295 TFEU and with this Regulation and published in the Official Journal of the European Union, in order to improve the principle of transparency by design and that of legal clarity of Union documents.
Dokumenti v zvezi z nezakonodajnimi postopki, kot so zavezujoči ukrepi ali ukrepi za urejanje notranje organizacije, upravni ali proračunski akti ali dokumenti politične narave (kot so sklepi, priporočila ali resolucije), bi morali biti lahko in kolikor je mogoče neposredno dostopni v skladu z načelom dobrega upravljanja iz člena 41 Listine.
Documents relating to non- legislative procedures, such as binding measures or measures dealing with internal organisation, administrative or budgetary acts, or of a political nature (such as conclusions, recommendations or resolutions) should be easily and as far as possible directly accessible in compliance with the principle of good administration outlined in Article 41 of the Charter.
Za vsako kategorijo dokumentov bi morala odgovorna institucija, organ, urad ali agencija državljanom omogočiti, da se seznanijo s predvidenim potekom notranjih postopkov, s tem, katere organizacijske enote bodo pristojne in kakšne so njihove pristojnosti, ter s postavljenimi roki in uradom, na katerega se lahko obrnejo.
For each category of document, the institution, body, office or agency responsible should make accessible to citizens the workflow of the internal procedures to be followed, which organisational units would be in charge, as well their remit, the deadlines set and the office to be contacted.
Institucije, organi, uradi in agencije bi morali ustrezno upoštevati priporočila evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
The institutions, bodies, offices and agencies should duly take into account the recommendations of the European Ombudsman.
V skladu s členom 295 PDEU bi morale doseči dogovor o skupnih smernicah o načinu, na katerega vsaka organizacijska enota evidentira notranje dokumente, jih kategorizira glede na možno poseganje v interese Unije in arhivira zaradi začasnih ali zgodovinskih potreb v skladu z načeli iz te uredbe.
They should agree, in compliance with Article 295 TFEU, on common guidelines as to the way in which each organisational unit should register the internal documents, classify them in case of possible prejudice to Union interests and archive them for temporary or historical needs according to the principles outlined in this Regulation.
Dosledno in usklajeno bi morali obveščati javnost o sprejetih ukrepih za izvajanje te uredbe ter usposabljati svoje osebje za pomoč državljanom, ki uresničujejo svoje pravice iz te uredbe.
They should inform the public in a consistent and coordinated way of the measures adopted to implement this Regulation, and train their staff to assist citizens in exercising their rights under this Regulation.
Zato bi morale institucije aktivno razširjati dokumente, ki so del zakonodajnega postopka
Therefore, institutions should actively disseminate documents which are part of the legislative process
, in izboljšati svoje komuniciranje z morebitnimi prosilci
and improve their communication with potential applicants
Institucije, organi, uradi in agencije bi morale doseči soglasje o medinstitucionalnem registru lobistov in drugih zainteresiranih strani, da se izboljša odprtost in preglednost zakonodajnega postopka.
In order to improve openness and transparency in the legislative process, an interinstitutional register of lobbyists and other interested parties should be agreed by the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.
Da bi dosegli večjo odprtost v delu institucij, se
In order to bring about greater openness in the work of the institutions, access to documents should be granted
Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji
by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission
zagotovi dostop do dokumentov, ki jih
not only to documents drawn up
pripravijo, in tudi do dokumentov, ki jih
, but also to documents received by them.
članica od
a Member State may request the
Komisije ali Sveta
Commission or the Council
zahteva, da se dokument, ki izhaja iz te države, brez njenega predhodnega soglasja ne pošlje tretjim strankam.
not to communicate to third parties a document originating from that State without its prior agreement.
Da bi dosegli večjo odprtost v delu institucij
In order to bring about greater openness in the work of the institutions
, organov, uradov in agencij
, bodies, offices and agencies
se zagotovi dostop do dokumentov, ki jih
, access to documents should be granted not only to documents drawn up
institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij
the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies
zahteva, da se dokument, ki izhaja iz te države, brez njenega predhodnega soglasja ne pošlje tretjim strankam
not to communicate to third parties
izven institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij
outside the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies themselves
Sodišče Evropske unije je pojasnilo, da obveznost posvetovanja z državami članicami glede zahtev za dostop do njihovih dokumentov ne daje državam članicam pravice, da zavrnejo tak dostop ali da se sklicujejo na nacionalne zakone ali določbe, in da lahko institucija, organ, urad ali agencija, ki prejme zahtevo, zavrne dostop samo na podlagi izjem iz te uredbe.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has specified that the requirement for Member States to be consulted in relation to requests for access to documents originating from them does not give them a right of veto, or the right to invoke national laws or provisions, and that the institution, body, office or agency receiving such a request may refuse access only on the grounds of the exceptions in this Regulation.
bi morali biti
documents of the institutions should be accessible to the public.
dostopni javnosti.
certain public and private interests
Vendar pa je treba nekatere javne in zasebne interese zaščititi z izjemami
should be protected by way of exceptions
Institucije bi morale imeti pravico varovati svoja notranja posvetovanja in razprave, kadar je to potrebno za varovanje svoje sposobnosti opravljanja nalog
The institutions should be entitled to protect their internal consultations and deliberations where necessary to safeguard their ability to carry out their tasks
Pri ocenjevanju izjem bi morale institucije upoštevati načela v zakonodaji
In assessing the exceptions, the institutions should take account of the principles in
bi morali biti dostopni javnosti.
Exceptions to this principle should be made to protect
Glede na dejstvo, da ta uredba neposredno izvaja člen 15 PDEU, pa tudi člen 42 Listine, bi morala opredeljena načela in omejitve dostopa do dokumentov prevladati nad vsemi pravili, ukrepi in praksami, ki jih institucije, organi, uradi ali agencije sprejmejo na drugačni pravni podlagi in ki uvajajo dodatne ali strožje izjeme od tistih, ki jih določa ta uredba.
Due to the fact that this Regulation directly implements Article 15 TFEU as well as Article 42 of the Charter, the defined principles and limits for access to documents should prevail over any rules, measures or practices adopted under a different legal basis by an institution, body, office or agency and introducing additional or stricter exceptions than the ones provided for in this Regulation.
členom 255(3) Pogodbe ES
Article 255(3) of the EC Treaty
vsaka institucija v svojem poslovniku določi posebne določbe o dostopu do dokumentov –
, each institution lays down specific provisions regarding access to its documents in its rules of procedure,
členom 15(3) PDEU ter načeli in pravili iz te uredbe
Article 15(3) TFEU and the principles and rules outlined in this Regulation,
vsaka institucija
each institution
, organ, urad ali agencija
, body, office and agency
, pa tudi do dokumentov, ki se nanašajo na njegove upravne naloge
, as well as to documents relating to its administrative tasks
(a) na podlagi javnega ali zasebnega interesa določiti načela, pogoje in omejitve, ki urejajo pravico dostopa do dokumentov
(a) to define the principles, conditions and limits on grounds of public or private interest governing the right of access to