natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
prav tako poudarja, da kohezijska politika ne more biti gonilna sila ali instrument za reševanje sektorskih vprašanj, kot so politike za raziskave in razvoj, industrijske inovacije in boj proti podnebnim spremembam, saj bi to pomenilo odmik od prvotnega cilja kohezijske politike in omejilo njeno vlogo pri spodbujanju razvojnih možnosti regij, ki so bistvene za približevanje najbolj prikrajšanih regij najrazvitejšim regijam;
Stresses, likewise, that cohesion policy cannot become a vehicle or instrument serving sectoral issues such as policies on research and development, industrial innovation and the fight against climate change, as this would mean diluting its primary objective and placing constraints on its use to promote regions' development potential, which is essential in order to bring the most disadvantaged regions closer to the most developed regions;
glede na potreben prehod k obnovljivim virom energije in razprave o podnebju zahteva večji prispevek kohezijske politike k hitremu razvoju okoljske tehnologije in obnovljivih virov; meni, da je to ena od prednostnih nalog, če je pri programih na voljo dovolj sredstev in če osredotočenost na obnovljive vire energije ustvarja dodano vrednost EU na podlagi načrtov za decentralizirane energetske rešitve z učinkovitimi tehnologijami za skladiščenje v regijah; se zavzema za izkoriščanje zmogljivosti regionalnega gospodarstva na tem področju;
Calls, in the light of the necessary shift towards renewable sources of energy and of the climate debate, for cohesion policy to make a greater contribution to the rapid development of environmental technology and renewables; considers that this should be one of the priorities if sufficient amounts are available in the programmes and a focus on renewables provides EU added value, based on plans for decentralised energy concepts involving effective energy storage technologies in the regions; is in favour of exploiting the regional economy's potential in this area;
vidi možnosti, da se s strukturnimi skladi podprejo naložbe v specifično energetsko infrastrukturo, vendar mora biti taka pomoč na voljo le v regijah, v katerih so iz političnih ali geografskih razlogov tržnoekonomske rešitve energetske oskrbe znatno omejene; poleg tega zahteva, naj se podpora iz strukturnih skladov vedno povezuje s krepitvijo notranjega energetskega trga in varnosti oskrbe ter z načelom upravljanja na več ravneh pri ravnanju z viri;
Sees scope under the Structural Funds for supporting investment in specific energy infrastructure, although such support must be available only in regions where political or geographical constraints significantly hamper the ability of the market to meet energy-supply needs; calls, too, for support from the structural funds to be linked in all cases to the strengthening of the internal energy market and the security of supply, as well as to the principle of multi-level governance in resource management;
meni tudi, da je kohezijska politika odgovorna za nujno premostitev vrzeli in zmanjševanje ozkih grl v osrednjem vseevropskem omrežju pomembnih evropskih prometnih poti, zlasti mejnih regijah, ki so bile pri tem doslej močno zapostavljene;
Also considers that cohesion policy has a responsibility to do what is needed to fill gaps and remove bottlenecks in a core TEN network of main routes of European significance, particularly in the border regions which have until now been badly neglected in this regard;
poudarja, da imajo vseevropska prometna omrežja odločilno vlogo pri koheziji evropskih regij, zato je treba zlasti v obmejnih in najbolj oddaljenih regijah okrepiti izgradnjo infrastrukture vseevropskih omrežij, pomorskih avtocest in klasificiranih evropskih poti ter dostop do njih; poziva k sprejetju vseh potrebnih ukrepov za zagotavljanje zadostnih finančnih sredstev in pravočasno izvedbo prednostnih projektov vseevropskega prometnega omrežja; predlaga, da se čezmejna „infrastruktura“ v nekaterih primerih obravnava kot prednostni projekt, ki je upravičen do sredstev v povezavi s cilji 1, 2 in 3, ter zahteva, da ima regionalna raven obvezno pravico, da prva poda predlog za to vrsto ukrepov, ter da mejne regije in lokalni organi enakopravno sodelujejo pri načrtovanju;
Emphasises that the trans-European transport networks play a decisive role in the cohesion of European regions and that development of TEN infrastructure, Motorways of the Sea and designated E-roads must therefore be stepped up and access to them improved, especially in border regions and outermost regions; calls for all necessary measures to be taken to ensure sufficient financing and guarantee timely implementation of priority TEN-T projects; suggests that certain cross-border ‘infrastructure’ should be considered as priority projects eligible for Objective 1, 2 and 3 funding and calls for there to be an obligatory right for the initial proposal for this type of action to be made at regional level and for equal participation of the border regions and local authorities in the planning process;
spodbuja uporabo nacionalnih virov, saj ustvarjajo taki ukrepi dodano vrednost v smislu krepitve regionalne konvergence, teritorialne kohezije in razvojnih dejavnosti, kot je turizem, kar je pomembno za oddaljene, npr. otoške regije;
Encourages the application of the national resources, given the added value of such measures in strengthening regional convergence, territorial cohesion and development activities such as tourism, which are important for remote regions, such as island regions;
podpira gospodarski razvoj in zaposlovanje v malih, srednjih in mikropodjetjih; zato zahteva, da se temeljni načeli evropskega akta za mala podjetja, tj. „najprej pomisli na male“ in „samo enkrat“, obravnavata kot eden od temeljev kohezijske politike, ter meni, da bi države članice in regije morale uporabljati ti načeli pri opredeljevanju svojih operativnih programov;
Supports economic development and employment in SMEs and micro-enterprises; requests, therefore, that the fundamental principles of the Small Business Act for Europe (SBAE) – i.e. ‘think small first’ and ‘only once’ – be considered one of the bases of cohesion policy, and considers that these principles should be applied by Member States and regions in the definition of their operational programmes;
poudarja, da so temelji strategije Evropa 2020 (inovacije, izobraževanje in usposabljanje, energija, okolje, zaposlovanje, konkurenčnost, kvalifikacije, odpravljanje revščine) že sestavni del kohezijske in strukturne politike; meni, da je mogoče izzive strategije Evropa 2020 zlahka vključiti v preizkušene tri ciljne strukture (konvergenčnost, regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje ter evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje);
Emphasises that the core components of the Europe 2020 strategy (innovation, education and training, energy, environment, employment, competitiveness, skills and combating poverty) are already integral to cohesion and structural policy; takes the view that the Europe 2020 challenges can be integrated very easily into the three objectives system (Convergence, Regional Competitiveness and Employment, and European Territorial Cooperation), which has proved its effectiveness;
poudarja, da lahko naložbe v inovacije in izobraževanje spodbujajo rast; vendar poudarja, da morajo primerna infrastruktura (promet, širokopasovni internet, energija) in ustrezne institucije (uravnotežena mešanica javnih naložb in fiskalne konsolidacije pri makroekonomskih ukrepih, storitve e-uprave, čezmejno učenje) nuditi učinkovito podporo;
Emphasises that investment in innovation and education can promote growth; points out, however, that the relevant infrastructure (transport, broadband internet, energy) and appropriate institutions (a balanced mix of public investment and fiscal policy consolidation with macro-economic measures, e-government services and cross-border learning) must provide effective support;
meni, da je treba tudi razvoj osnovne infrastrukture šteti za skladno s cilji strategije Evropa 2020, ker šele konkurenčna prometna, energetska in komunikacijska omrežja ter infrastrukture za odstranjevanje odpadkov konvergenčnim regijam omogočajo, da sodelujejo pri doseganju ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 – zato morajo ti cilji prav za šibkejše in najbolj prikrajšane regije dopuščati nekaj prožnosti pri njihovi razlagi;
Takes the view that the development of basic infrastructure should also be regarded as compatible with Europe 2020, because only when they have competitive transport, energy and communications networks and waste-management infrastructure will the convergence regions be in a position to contribute to achieving the Europe 2020 objectives, which is precisely why the weakest and neediest regions must be given some flexibility to interpret those objectives;
poudarja, da je Evropski socialni sklad najpomembnejši instrument za izvajanje socialne razsežnosti strategije Evropa 2020 in da lahko znatno prispeva k izpolnitvi osrednjih prednostnih nalog te strategije in sicer glede zaposlovanja, prehoda na trajnostno gospodarstvo, zmanjšanja števila osipnikov, boja proti revščini, diskriminaciji in socialni izključenosti ter iskanju rešitve za različne socialne razmere, v katerih se znajdejo ljudje; pri tem poudarja, da bi v analizi prednosti in pomanjkljivosti ter priložnosti in nevarnosti poleg BDP koristili tudi drugi družbeni kazalniki;
Stresses that the ESF is the most important instrument for the implementation of the social dimension of the Europe 2020 strategy and that the fund can contribute significantly to the fulfilment of the central priorities of that strategy, namely employment, transition to a sustainable economy, a lower number of school drop-outs, fighting against poverty, discrimination and social exclusion and finding answers to the different social situations people find themselves in; stresses, in this context, that, alongside GDP, other social indicators would be useful in the SWOT analysis;
meni, da je Evropski socialni sklad bistvenega pomena za kohezijsko politiko in da lahko poveča tudi njen prispevek k doseganju ciljev strategije EU 2020, tudi na področju trajnostne rasti, kjer lahko mala in srednja podjetja podpira pri ustvarjanju zelenih delovnih mest;
Considers that the ESF is of crucial importance to cohesion policy and has the potential to enhance the latter's contribution towards meeting the Europe 2020 objectives, including in the area of sustainable growth through the provision of support to SMEs for the creation of green jobs;
meni, da je boj proti diskriminaciji na trgu dela, najsibo na osnovi spola, spolne usmerjenosti, narodnosti, starosti, invalidnosti ali kraja prebivališča, ključnega pomena za spodbujanje dejanskih enakih možnosti; ugotavlja, da je povečanje stopnje zaposlenosti žensk ključnega pomena za doseganje ciljev zaposlovanja iz strategije EU 2020 in da je v ta namen treba odpraviti vse ovire za udeležbo žensk na trgu dela;
Considers the fight against discrimination in the labour market, whether related to gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, age, disability or place of residence, to be crucial for the promotion of genuine equality of opportunity; notes that increasing the female employment rate is crucial for reaching the Europe 2020 employment target and that barriers to women's labour market participation must therefore be fully addressed;
meni, da mora biti BDP še naprej osrednje merilo za določitev območij, ki so upravičena do najvišje podpore (kjer je BDP na prebivalca nižji od 75 % povprečja v EU), in po potrebi kohezijskih držav (kjer je BNP na prebivalca nižji od 90 % povprečja v EU); meni, da morajo imeti pristojni nacionalni in regionalni organi možnost, da na ustrezni ravni odločanja za vsak cilj in tako, da se odražajo geografske koncentracije, uporabijo dodatne kazalnike, sprejete v pogodbah o razvojnih in naložbenih partnerstvih, s katerimi lahko ocenijo socialne, ekonomske, okoljske, demografske in geografske izzive, s katerimi se soočajo;
Takes the view that GDP must be retained as the key criterion in the definition of areas eligible for maximum support (those with a per capita GDP below 75% of the EU average) and, where appropriate, cohesion countries (per capita GNI below 90% of the EU average); considers that the competent national and regional authorities should be given scope for the use – at the appropriate decision-making level, for each objective and in a manner reflecting geographical concentrations – of additional indicators, to be agreed in the development and investment partnership contracts, with which to assess the social, economic, environmental, demographic and geographical challenges which they face;
zahteva, naj bo kohezijska politika v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo še naprej osredotočena predvsem na najbolj zaostale regije; poudarja, da je treba v okviru cilja 1 (konvergenčnost) najbolj prikrajšanim regijam dodeliti primeren delež, ki bo sorazmeren z težo njihovih razvojnih težav;
Calls for cohesion policy to continue, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty, to target as a priority those regions that lag furthest behind; stresses that the neediest regions should be granted an appropriate share – commensurate with the seriousness of their development problems – of the funding available under Objective 1 (Convergence);
poziva, naj se za regije, ki tudi v več programskih obdobjih kljub največji podpori niso mogle doseči omembe vrednega izboljšanja svojega gospodarskega, socialnega in okoljskega položaja, omejijo obdobja upravičenosti;
Calls for a limit to be placed on eligibility periods for regions which prove unable to show any significant improvements in their economic, social and environmental situation after several programming periods, despite maximum support;
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi predlog za trajanje naslednjega programskega obdobja, ki bo zagotavljalo prilagodljivo, trdno in sorazmerno prehodno pomoč za regije, ki ne spadajo več pod cilj konvergence, da se rešijo razmere v vsaki od njih, ter za regije z BDP med 75 % in 90 % povprečja v EU, v obliki vmesne kategorije, da se prepreči različna obravnava regij kljub podobnim razmeram; meni,da bi morala ta posebna ureditev nadomestiti sedanji sistem postopne odprave in postopne uvedbe ter tako vzpostaviti pravičen sistem, ki bo bolje odpravljal negativne učinke gospodarske in finančne krize na regije, hkrati pa krepil pravico in solidarnost, ki sta temeljni vrednoti kohezijske politike; poudarja, da prehodni ukrepi za naslednje programsko obdobje ne bi smeli nastati na račun sedanjih konvergenčnih (cilj 1) in konkurenčnih (cilj 2) regij ali cilja evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja (cilj 3);
Calls on the Commission to present a proposal for the duration of the next programming period that will ensure the provision of adjustable, robust and proportionate transitional assistance for regions no longer coming under the Convergence Objective, in order to address their specific situation, and for regions with per capita GDP between 75% and 90% of the EU average, in the form of an intermediate category, in order to avoid unequal treatment of regions in spite of their similar situations; considers that this specific arrangement must replace the current ‘phasing-out’ and ‘phasing-in’ systems, thus creating a fair system which better addressees the negative impacts of the economic and financial crisis on the regions, while strengthening justice and solidarity, which are fundamental values of cohesion policy; stresses that these transitional measures for the next programming period should not be established at the expense of the current Convergence (Objective 1) and Competitiveness (Objective 2) regions or the European Territorial Cooperation Objective (Objective 3);
poziva h krepitvi horizontalno usmerjenega cilja 2 (regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje), da se dosežejo rezultati pri omejenem številu prednostnih nalog EU, kot je podpora malim in srednjim podjetjem, zelene inovacije, lokalna gospodarstva, izobraževanje in usposabljanje, infrastruktura, trajnostna mobilnost, obnovljive energije in energetska oskrba, učinkovitost virov in socialna vključenost; poudarja, da je treba ohraniti in nadalje razvijati uveljavljeni sistem, ki zagotavlja, da lahko bolj razvite regije odstranjujejo regionalne strukturne pomanjkljivosti, zmanjšujejo teritorialne razlike, prispevajo k skupnim evropskim ciljem in premagajo prihodnje izzive z uporabo struktur, ki se lahko prilagajajo glede na spremenjene razmere, med drugim tudi inovacijskih grozdov in razpisov za financiranje teh regij; poziva k uvedbi dodatnih ukrepov za območja, ki so jih močno prizadele strukturne spremembe, kar lahko prispeva k izboljšanju družbenoekonomskih razmer in infrastrukturega položaja; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da morajo biti strategije dovolj prilagodljive, da bodo omogočale odpravljanje težav in upoštevanje posebnosti vsake posamezne regije;
Calls for a strengthening of Objective 2 (Regional Competitiveness and Employment) through its horizontal nature to achieve results on a limited number of EU priorities, such as support for SMEs, green innovations, local economies, education and training, infrastructure, sustainable mobility, renewable energies and energy supply, resource efficiency and social inclusion; stresses that the proven system of ensuring that more developed regions are able to remove regional structural weaknesses, reduce territorial disparities, contribute to common European objectives and meet future challenges when using structures that can respond flexible to changing circumstance, including, inter alia, innovation clusters and competition for funding in these regions, must be retained and developed further; calls for additional measures for areas highly affected by structural change which can help to improve the socio-economic and infrastructure situation; points out in this context that strategies should be designed with sufficient flexibility to be able to cope with the problems and particularities of each individual region;
zahteva ukrepe, ki bodo zagotavljali, da bodo lahko bolj razvite regije posodabljale svoj družbeni in gospodarski kapital, in ki se bodo osredotočali na posamezna območja revščine in neprimernega gospodarskega razvoja;
Calls for action to ensure that more developed regions are able to modernise their social and economic capital and to address specific pockets of deprivation and inadequate economic development;
je trdno prepričan, da je treba cilj 3 (evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje) na vseh notranjih mejah EU in v njegovih treh razsežnostih (čezmejno, medregionalno in čeznacionalno sodelovanje) okrepiti, in zahteva, naj se ustrezni delež strukturnih skladov poviša na 7 %; zahteva, naj se sredstva za vsak posamezen program teritorialnega sodelovanja dodeljujejo na podlagi usklajenih meril, da bi se strateško in celostno odzvali na potrebe in posebnosti vsakega zadevnega geografskega ozemlja in območja; poudarja vlogo obmejnih regij za dosego ciljev strategije Evropa 2020; meni, da je treba izboljšati usklajenost vseevropskih omrežij, zlasti prometnih in energetskih, ter čezmejne infrastrukture, da se povečajo subvencije za omrežja, ki so v skladu z evropskimi prednostnimi nalogami, in zahteva ustrezno povečanje sredstev za vse obmejne regije; poziva k poenostavitvi izvedbenih predpisov, ki veljajo za programe v okviru cilja 3, na podlagi načela sorazmernosti, ter k pripravi skupnih pravil za upravičenost, kar so pogoji za povečanje učinkovitosti in prepoznavnosti teh programov; poudarja, da je treba vključevati tiste, ki sprejemajo odločitve na lokalni ravni, saj lahko programi zaživijo samo ob tem zagotovilu;
Takes the unequivocal view that efforts under Objective 3 (European Territorial Cooperation) need to be stepped up at all EU internal borders and at all three levels of such cooperation (cross-border, inter-regional and trans-national), and calls for the relevant share of structural funds to be increased to 7%; calls for the allocation of funding for each territorial cooperation programme to be based on harmonised criteria, in order to provide a strategic and integrated response to the needs and specificities of each geographical territory and area concerned; stresses the importance of the border regions in terms of achievement of the Europe 2020 objectives; considers that there is a need to improve coordination between the Trans-European Networks, particularly those concerned with transport and energy, and cross-border infrastructure, and to increase the subsidies for those networks in line with European priorities, and calls for a corresponding increase in funding for all border regions; calls for simplification of the implementing rules governing Objective 3 programmes, based on the principle of proportionality, as well as for the development of a common set of eligibility rules, all of which are preconditions for these programmes becoming more effective and more visible; stresses the need for local decision-makers to be closely involved, since programmes can be fleshed out only if this is guaranteed;
meni, da so evropska združenja za teritorialno sodelovanje edinstven in dragocen instrument za teritorialno upravljanje, ki ustreza potrebam po strukturiranem sodelovanju in ki ga je treba spodbujati kot orodje za vzpostavitev sistemov čezmejnega upravljanja in za zagotavljanje pripadnosti različnim politikam na regionalni in lokalni ravni;
Considers that EGTCs represent a unique, highly valuable territorial governance instrument which responds to the needs for structured cooperation and must be promoted as a means of setting up cross-border governance systems ensuring regional and local ownership of the different policies;
zavrača vse predloge nacionalizacije ali sektorizacije kohezijske politike; meni, da bi novi tematski skladi (podnebje, energija in promet) spodkopali preizkušeno načelo deljenega upravljanja in celovitih razvojnih programov ter ogrozili razpoložljive sinergije in učinkovitost posegov ter s tem regionalno sodelovanje pri izvajanju ciljev strategije Evropa 2020;
Rejects absolutely all proposals to nationalise or sectoralise cohesion policy; takes the view that new thematic funds (for climate, energy and transport) would undermine the tried and tested principle of shared management and integrated development programmes and jeopardise the availability of synergies and the effectiveness of interventions, and thus the regions' contribution to the achievement of the Europe 2020 objectives;
vztraja, da mora Evropski socialni sklad ostati del kohezijske politike, saj je samo tako mogoče razviti in izvajati celovite strategije za reševanje gospodarskih in družbenih težav;
Insists that the European Social Fund must remain part of cohesion policy, as only in this way can integrated strategies for resolving economic and social problems be developed and implemented;
podpira Komisijo v njenih prizadevanjih za močnejši, učinkovitejši in prepoznavnejši Evropski socialni sklad; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj se pri svojih pogajanjih sporazumejo o nujnem znesku, ki ga mora Evropski socialni sklad prispevati v strukturne sklade;
Supports the Commission in its aim to ensure a stronger, efficient and more visible ESF; calls, to this end, on the Commission and Member States to reach agreement in their negotiations on the necessary amount of ESF contribution within the Structural Funds;
meni, da je treba učinkovitost Evropskega socialnega sklada okrepiti zlasti s spodbudami in ne s sankcijami;
Takes the view that measures to improve the effectiveness of the ESF should be based primarily on incentives rather than penalties;
poudarja, da je gospodarska kriza dodatno povečala nujno potrebo po vzpostavitvi ukrepov v sektorjih, ki jih zajema Evropski socialni sklad, zlasti za spodbujanje zaposlovanja, strokovne prekvalifikacije, socialnega vključevanja in zmanjševanja revščine;
Stresses that the economic crisis has further increased the urgency of the need for measures in the sectors covered by the ESF, in particular to promote employment, occupational redeployment, social inclusion and poverty reduction;