natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obžaluje težave, na katere je naletel v postopkih razrešnice za leti 2007 in 2008, in ponavlja svoje stališče, ki je bilo izraženo v resoluciji z dne 16. junija 2010 UL L 252, 25.9.2010, str.
Regrets the difficulties encountered in the 2007 and 2008 discharge procedures, and reaffirms its position expressed in its resolution of 16 June 2010 OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p.
o razrešnici za Svet za proračunsko leto 2008, zlasti poziva Svet, da skupaj s Parlamentom oblikuje letni postopek znotraj postopka razrešnice, da se zagotovijo vse informacije, potrebne za izvrševanje proračuna Sveta;
on the Council discharge for the financial year 2008, in particular, its call on the Council to establish together with Parliament an annual procedure within the discharge procedure with a view to providing all the information needed as regards the execution of the Council budget;
ponavlja, da bi bilo treba odhodke Sveta pregledati na enak način kot odhodke drugih institucij Unije, in predlaga, da bi bil najbolj primeren pristop ta, ki je bil naveden v resoluciji z dne 16. junija 2010, zlasti, da ’bi moral ta pregled temeljiti na naslednjih pisnih dokumentih, ki so jih predložile vse institucije:
Reiterates that the expenditure of the Council ought to be scrutinised in the same way as that of the other Union institutions, and suggests that the most appropriate approach would be as indicated in its resolution of 16 June 2010, in particular, that ’'such scrutiny is based on the following written documents submitted by all institutions:
letno poročilo o dejavnostih glede njihovega proračunskega in finančnega upravljanja,
Annual Activity Report on their budget and financial management,
kot tudi ustno predstavitev, ki poteka na seji odbora, pristojnega za postopek razrešnice’;
as well as an oral presentation given in the meeting of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure’;
globoko obžaluje, da je predsedstvo Sveta zavrnilo povabilo na sejo odbora, pristojnega za postopek razrešnice, med katero je bila predvidena razprava o stališču predsedstva Sveta glede predlaganega postopka ter o morebitnih načinih sodelovanja glede razrešnice, in, da je tudi generalni sekretar Sveta zavrnil udeležbo na seji odbora, pristojnega za postopek razrešnice, in ni izmenjal stališč o postopku razrešnice Sveta;
Deeply regrets both that the Council Presidency declined the invitations to attend the meeting of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, where it was planned to discuss the Council Presidency's standing on the proposed procedure and the possible modalities of cooperation as regards the discharge, and also that the Secretary-General of the Council declined to attend the meeting of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure and to exchange views on the Council discharge procedure;
je seznanjen s predlaganim memorandumom o soglasju med Parlamentom in Svetom o sodelovanju med njihovim letnim postopkom o razrešnici, kot je bil priložen k pismu generalnega sekretarja Sveta z dne 4. marca 2011, ter ugotavlja, da je Svet pripravljen postopek o razrešnici obravnavati ločeno od proračunskega postopka, vendar ponavlja, da je treba ohraniti razlikovanje med različnimi vlogami Parlamenta in Sveta v postopku razrešnice in da nikdar noben razlog ne sme odvrniti Sveta od tega, da je popolnoma odgovoren do javnosti glede sredstev, ki so mu zaupana; globoko obžaluje, da sta predsedstvo Sveta in generalni sekretar Sveta zavrnila udeležbo na seji odbora, pristojnega za postopek razrešnice, in nista priskrbela informacij in odgovorov na vprašanja o razrešnici Sveta za proračunsko leto 2009, ter tudi nista pisno odgovorila na vprašalnik, ki ga je predložil poročevalec;
Notes the proposed memorandum of understanding between the Parliament and the Council on their cooperation during their annual discharge procedure, as annexed to the letter of the Secretary-General of the Council of 4 March 2011, and takes note of the Council's readiness to treat the discharge procedure separately from the budgetary procedure, but reiterates that a distinction must be maintained with regard to the different roles of Parliament and the Council in the discharge procedure and that at no time and under no circumstances can the Council be anything other than fully accountable to the public for the funds entrusted to it; deeply regrets that the Council Presidency and the General Secretariat of the Council declined to attend the meeting of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure to provide information and answers to questions on the Council discharge for the financial year 2009, and that they also declined to provide written replies to the questionnaire as submitted by the rapporteur;
se seznanja z dobro voljo madžarskega predsedstva in z doseženim napredkom; za izboljšanje izmenjave informacij pri postopku razrešnice predlaga, da se sledi istemu pristopu, kot za ostale institucije, glavni elementi katerega naj bi bili:
Notes the goodwill of the Hungarian Presidency and the progress achieved; proposes, in order to facilitate the exchange of information in the discharge procedure, to follow the same approach as the rest of the other institutions, the fundamental elements of which should be:
potek uradnega srečanja med predstavniki Sveta in parlamentarnim odborom, pristojnim za postopek razrešnice, na katerem bi sodelovali generalni sekretar Sveta in tekoče predsedstvo Sveta, predsedstvo odbora, pristojnega za postopek razrešnice, poročevalec in poslanci, ki predstavljajo politične skupine (koordinatorji in/ali poročevalci v senci), da se priskrbijo vse potrebne informacije o izvrševanju proračuna Sveta;
that a formal meeting be held between representatives of the Council and Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, to be attended by the Secretary-General of the Council and the Presidency in office, the bureau of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, the rapporteur and the members representing political groups (coordinators and/or shadow rapporteurs) in order to provide all the necessary information on the implementation of the Council budget,
generalni sekretar Sveta bi moral odgovoriti na vprašanja, ki jih je Svetu predložil odbor, pristojen za postopek razrešnice; ter
that the Secretary-General of the Council answer questions submitted to the Council by the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure; and
priprava časovnega razporeda za racionalizacijo in okrepitev te začasne rešitve;
that a timetable be established so as to streamline and stabilise this interim solution;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj izvede poglobljeno oceno nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov na Svetu, ki bo podobna oceni na Sodišču, pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic in Evropskem nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov med pripravo letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2009;
Urges the Court of Auditors to perform an in-depth assessment of supervisory and control systems in the Council, similar to the assessments it performed on the Court of Justice, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor in the course of preparation of the Court of Auditors’ annual report concerning the financial year 2009;
navaja, da so razlogi za odložitev naslednji:
Indicates that the reasons for postponement are as follows:
Svet ni sprejel nobenega poziva, naj se uradno in formalno sestane z odborom Parlamenta, pristojnim za postopek razrešnice, ali z njegovim poročevalcem, da bi razpravljali o izvrševanju proračuna Sveta za leto 2009,
the Council has not accepted any invitation to officially and formally meet Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure or its rapporteur to discuss matters concerning the Council budget execution for 2009,
Svet ni želel podati pisnega odgovora, v katerem bi Parlamentu zagotovil informacije in dokumente, zahtevane od Sveta v prilogi k pismu z dne 14. decembra 2010, ki ga je podpisal poročevalec,
the Council refused to provide a written answer providing Parliament with the information and documents requested from the Council in the annex to a letter of 14 December 2010 signed by the rapporteur,
Parlament od Sveta ni prejel temeljnih dokumentov, na primer popolnega seznama proračunskih prerazporeditev;
Parliament has not received fundamental documents from the Council, such as the full list of budgetary transfers;
poziva generalnega sekretarja Sveta, da odboru Parlamenta, pristojnemu za postopek razrešnice, najkasneje do 15. junija 2011 predloži izčrpne pisne odgovore na naslednja vprašanja:
Calls on the Secretary-General of the Council to provide Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, by 15 June 2011 at the latest, with comprehensive written answers to the following questions:
Glede prejšnje razprave o razrešnici Svetu v odboru Parlamenta, pristojnem za postopek razrešnice, se Svet teh sej ni redno udeleževal, vendar pa velja, da je udeležba Sveta bistvenega pomena, da bi odgovoril na vprašanja članov odbora o razrešnici Svetu.
with regard to previous Council discharge debates in Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, the Council did not attend these meetings regularly, however, it is considered of utmost importance that the Council attends in order to reply to committee members’ questions referring to the Council discharge.
Zakaj Svet vsako leto spremeni predstavitev/format notranje revizije?
why does the Council change the presentation/the format of the internal audit every year?
Ali je bila opravljena zunanja revizija?
has an external audit been carried out?
Do sedaj so dejavnosti Sveta pomenile sofinanciranje s Komisijo, ki se je po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe povečalo.
until now, the activity of the Council implied co-financing with the Commission, which has experienced an increase after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Glede na to, da se je z Lizbonsko pogodbo povečalo sofinanciranje s Komisijo, kako Svet razume ’odgovoriti na primerne poizvedbe’?
Given that the Treaty of Lisbon increased the co-financing with the Commission, what is the Council's understanding of ’respond to the appropriate enquiries’?
Računsko sodišče je v svojem letnem poročilu za 2009 ugotovilo, da v dveh od šestih revidiranih postopkov javnih naročil Svet ni upošteval pravil finančne uredbe glede objave izida postopka.
the Court of Auditors, in its annual report 2009, found that in two out of six procurement procedures audited, the Council did not respect the rules of the Financial Regulation for the publication of the outcome of the procedure.
Za osebje posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije: Prosim navedite število zaposlenih (vse osebje, kadrovski načrt in preostalo) – število delovnih mest, stopnje – za osebje posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije v Svetu v letu 2009.
staff of European Union Special Representatives (EUSRs): Please indicate the staff (all staff, establishment plan and others) – number of posts, grade – for the EUSRs in the Council for 2009.
Koliko ljudi iz osebja posebnih predstavnikov Evropske unije je bilo 1. januarja 2011 premeščenih v ESZD?
How many of the EUSRs’ staff were transferred on 1 January 2011 to the EEAS?
Svet proračunska vprašanja, povezana s posledicami Lizbonske pogodbe, izpostavlja v točki 2.2. poročila o finančnih dejavnosti – 11327/10, FIN 278.
the Council highlights budgetary questions concerning the consequences of the Treaty of Lisbon in point 2.2 in the financial activity report – 11327/10, FIN 278.
Kakšni so bili odhodki iz poslovanja, upravni odhodki, odhodki za osebje, stavbe, itd., ki jih je Svet načrtoval za leto 2009, da bi uvedel mesto visokega predstavnika/podpredsednika Komisije?
what were the operational expenditures, administrative expenditures, staff, buildings, etc. envisaged by the Council for 2009 in order to set up the High Representative/Vice President of the Commission (HR/VP)?
Visoka predstavnica/podpredsednica Komisije je funkcijo prevzela 1. decembra 2009.
the HR/VP came into office on 1 December, 2009.
Kako bodo pisarniški prostori, ki so se sprostili s premestitvijo osebja v ESZD, vplivali na načrte Sveta glede stavb?
how will office space released in the process of staff transfer to the EEAS influence Council's plans on buildings?
Kakšni so bili upravni odhodki in odhodki iz poslovanja, povezani z nalogami skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP)/skupne varnostne in obrambne politike (SVOP), ki so se vsaj delno financirale iz proračune Unije za leto 2009?
what was the administrative and operational expenditure related to the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)/Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) tasks, which were at least part-financed from the Union budget in 2009?
Kakšen je bil strošek srečanj delovnih skupin Sveta za SZVP/SVOP v Bruslju in drugod in kje so ta srečanja potekala?
what was the cost of meetings for Council working groups on CFSP/CSDP in Brussels and elsewhere and where did these meetings take place?
Kakšni so bili upravni odhodki za izvajanje vojaških operacij v okviru skupne varnostne in obrambne politike (SVOP)?
what was the administrative expenditure relating to the implementation of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP)/CSDP military operations?
Kakšni so bili administrativni odhodki, porabljeni za delovanje mehanizma ATHENA, ter koliko delovnih mest je bilo potrebnih za ta mehanizem, in ali se bo katero od njih preneslo na ESZD?
what was the administrative expenditure implemented for the operation of the ’ATHENA’ mechanism, how many posts were needed for that mechanism, will any of the posts in question be transferred to the EEAS?
Stopnja zasedenosti delovnih mest v kadrovskem načrtu Sveta je nizka (91 % leta 2009 in 90 % leta 2008).
there is a low occupation rate of posts in the Council's establishment plan (91 % in 2009, 90 % in 2008).
Ali lahko generalni sekretariat s trenutno stopnjo zasedenosti delovnih mest opravlja vse svoje funkcije?
Can the CGS perform all its functions with the current occupation rate?
Ali je nizka stopnja zasedenosti mest specifična za določene službe?
Are lower occupation rates specific to any particular services?
Kakšno je skupno število delovnih mest, namenjenih za naloge usklajevanja politike in upravno podporo (kot so opredeljena v letnih poročilih Komisije o oceni osebja)?
what is the total number of posts assigned to the task of ’policy coordination’ and administrative support (as defined in the Commission's annual staff screening reports)?
Svet je za dosego upravnih ciljev v letu 2009 delovnim postopkom dodal delo na daljavo.
to achieve the administrative objectives in 2009 the Council added teleworking to its working procedures.
Svet je povečal število svojih delovnih mest za 15 (8 AD in 7 AST), da bi pokril kadrovske potrebe enote za irski jezik.
the Council increased its posts by 15 (8 AD and 7 AST) to cover the staffing requirements of the Irish language unit.
Skupina za razmislek je bila ustanovljena 14. decembra 2007, njeni člani pa so bili imenovani 15. in 16. oktobra 2008.
the ’Reflection Group’ was established on 14 December 2007, and its members appointed on 15-16 October 2008.
Svet je skupini za premislek namenil 1 060 000 EUR.
The Council earmarked EUR 1 060 000 for the ’Reflection Group’.
Zakaj Svet na strani 12 prenos iz tolmačenja na potne stroške poslancev ocenjuje na 12 000 000 EUR, na strani 13 pa na 10 558 362 EUR?
Why is the transfer from interpretation to delegates’ travelling expenses estimated at EUR 12 000 000 by the Council at page 12 and at EUR 10 558 362 at page 13?
Zakaj je bil porabljen preostali znesek, prenesen iz tolmačenja (skupni preneseni znesek znaša 17 798 362 EUR)?
What has the remaining amount transferred from interpretation been spent on (the total amount transferred from interpretation is EUR 17 798 362)?
Poleg tega poziva Svet, naj pojasni veliko število nalogov za izterjavo, izdanih pred letom 2009 in prenesenih na leto 2009, (12 300 000 EUR) ter terjatev iz izjav, povezanih z letom 2007 (6 300 000 EUR);
In addition, the Council is asked to explain the large amount of recovery orders made before 2009 and carried over to 2009 (EUR 12 300 000 ) as well as recoveries made from declarations relating to 2007 (EUR 6 300 000)
Svet je leta 2009, kot že leta 2008, prerazporedil znaten znesek iz svojega proračuna zlasti za nepremičninski sektor, ter pri tem več kot podvojil začetne predvidene zneske za nakup stavbe Residence Palace (prerazporeditev v višini 17 800 000 EUR poleg 15 000 000 EUR, ki so bili za ta namen predvideni v proračunu za leto 2009).
in 2009 the Council, as it did in 2008, reallocated a considerable amount of its budget to buildings, in particular, more than doubling the initial allocations to the acquisition of the Residence Palace (reallocated EUR 17 800 000 in addition to EUR 15 000 000 earmarked in Budget 2009).
Izvajanje proračuna Sveta – prenesena sredstva: Ali lahko Svet predloži ocenjen znesek in zadeve računov za leto 2009, ki niso bili prejeti do junija 2010, in zato prenesen?
implementation of the Council budget - appropriations carried over: Could the Council present the estimated amount and subject of the invoices which were not received by June 2010 for the year 2009 and therefore carried over?
Prenos sredstev na leto 2010 iz naslova namenskih prejemkov iz leta 2009 je znašal 31 800 000 EUR.
the carryover to 2010 of the appropriations of assigned revenues accrued in 2009 amounted to EUR 31 800 000.
Kaj pomeni ’tehnična zagotovitev 25 000 000 EUR za začetek delovanja Evropskega sveta 2010?’ (glej poročilo o finančni dejavnosti – 11327/10, FIN 278 – točka 3.1, točka IV);
what does ’technical provision of EUR 25 000 000 for the launch of the European Council 2010’ mean? (cf. the financial activity report – 11327/10, FIN 278 - point 3.1, IV bullet)
Kakšna je stopnja tajnosti proračuna Sveta za različne proračunske vrstice?
what is the level of confidentiality of the Council budget specified by the different budget lines?
Ali lahko Svet izpostavi konkretne ukrepe, sprejete za izboljšanje kakovosti finančnega poslovanja Sveta, zlasti glede zadev, omenjenih v odstavku 5 resolucije Parlamenta UL L 19, 23.1.2010, str.
can the Council point out the specific measures taken to improve the quality of the Council's financial management, in particular as regards the points raised in paragraph 5 of Parliament's resolution OJ L 19, 23.1.2010, p.
z dne 25. novembra 2009, priložene sklepu o razrešnici Svetu za proračunsko leto 2007?
of 25 November 2009 accompanying its decision on discharge to the Council for the financial year 2007?
poziva generalnega sekretarja Sveta, naj odboru Parlamenta, pristojnemu za postopek razrešnice, najkasneje do 15. junija 2011 predloži:
Calls on the Secretary-General of the Council to provide Parliament's Committee responsible for the discharge procedure, by 15 June 2011 at the latest, with:
popoln seznam proračunskih prerazporeditev v zvezi s proračunom Sveta za leto 2009;
the full list of budgetary transfers concerning the 2009 Council budget ,
pisno izjavo o stroških Sveta za misije, ki so jih opravili posebni predstavniki Evropske unije;
a written statement on the Council's mission expenses as carried out by the EUSRs,
izjavo držav članic za leto 2007 (glej poročilo o finančni dejavnosti – 11327/10, FIN 278 – točka 3.2.2, točka II), in
the Members States’ declaration for 2007 (cf. the financial activity report – 11327/10, FIN 278 - point 3.2.2, II bullet), and
poročilo skupine za razmislek, da bi razumel, zakaj tako poročilo stane 1 060 000 EUR (glej poročilo o finančni dejavnosti – 11327/10, FIN 278 – točka 2.2).
the report of the ’Reflection Group’ in order to understand why such a report costs EUR 1 060 000 (cf. the financial activity report – 11327/10, FIN 278 - point 2.2).
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek V – Računsko sodišče ( C7-0215/2010 – 2010/2146(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 10 May 2011 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2009, Section V – Court of Auditors ( C7-0215/2010 – 2010/2146(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009 ( SEK(2010)0963 – C7-0215/2010 ) UL C 308, 12.11.2010, str.
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2009 ( SEC(2010)0963 – C7-0215/2010 ) OJ C 308, 12.11.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča organu, pristojnemu za podeljevanje razrešnice, o opravljenih notranjih revizijah v letu 2009,
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ annual report to the discharge authority on internal audits carried out in 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0138/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0138/2011 ),
podeli generalnemu sekretarju Računskega sodišča razrešnico glede izvrševanja proračuna Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2009;
Grants the Secretary-General of the Court of Auditors discharge in respect of the implementation of the Court of Auditors budget for the financial year 2009;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009, oddelek V – Računsko sodišče ( C7-0215/2010 – 2010/2146(DEC) )
European Parliament resolution of 10 May 2011 with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2009, Section V – Court of Auditors ( C7-0215/2010 – 2010/2146(DEC) )
opozarja, da je zaključne račune Evropskega računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2009 revidiralo zunanje podjetje
Recalls that, for the financial year 2009, the accounts of the Court of Auditors were audited by an external firm,
(kot leta 2008 in 2007), ki je prišlo do naslednjih zaključkov:
(as in 2008 and 2007), which reached the following conclusions:
glede točnosti računovodskih izkazov za proračunsko leto 2009 meni, da
in relation to the accuracy of the accounts for the financial year 2009, that ’
'računovodski izkazi dajejo, v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2009 z dne 25. junija 2002, Uredbo Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta in računovodskimi predpisi Evropskega računskega sodišča, resnično in pošteno sliko o finančnem stanju Evropskega računskega sodišča na dan 31. decembra 2009 in o finančni uspešnosti ter denarnih tokovih za končano proračunsko leto’
in our opinion, these financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the European Court of Auditors as of 31 December, 2009, and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, EURATOM) No. 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002, Commission Regulation (EC, EURATOM) No. 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the said Council Regulation, and the European Court of Auditors’ Accounting Rules’
glede uporabe finančnih sredstev, ki so bila dodeljena Računskemu sodišču in o ustreznosti kontrolnih postopkov med proračunskim letom 2009, da
in relation to the use of financial resources assigned to the Court of Auditors and the adequacy of control procedures in place during the financial year 2009, that ’
'nismo opazili ničesar, zaradi česar bi menili, da v vseh pomembnih vidikih in na podlagi zgoraj opisanih meril: (a) Sodišču dodeljeni viri niso bili porabljeni za namene, za katere so bili načrtovani; (b) vzpostavljeni kontrolni postopki ne nudijo potrebnih jamstev, ki zagotavljajo skladnost finančnih operacij z veljavnimi pravili in uredbami’
nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that in all material respects and based on criteria described above: (a) the resources assigned to the Court have not been used for their intended purposes; (b) the control procedures in place do not provide the necessary guarantees to ensure the compliance of financial operations with the applicable rules and regulations