natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
zmanjšanja izgub omrežja, preprečevanju ozkih grl pri pošiljanju – vključno z notranjimi projekti, če prispevajo k razvoju čezmejnih medsebojnih povezav – in olajšanju čezmejnega prenosa,
reducing network losses, preventing transmission bottlenecks – including in respect of internal projects as long as they contribute to the development of cross border interconnection – and relieving cross-border transmission,
reševanju odvisnosti od enega samega dobavitelja,
resolving single supplier dependency,
večji raznovrstnosti tranzitnih poti in virov oskrbe,
diversification with regard to transit routes and the origin of resources,
vključevanju obnovljive energije v omrežje in povečevanju uporabe obnovljivih virov energije z zmanjšanjem omejevanja obnovljive energije;
integration of renewable energy to the grid and increasing the use of renewable energy sources by reducing renewable energy curtailment;
meni, da bi morali za to, da bi upravičili prednostno obravnavo nekaterih projektov, upoštevati naslednja merila:
Considers that, to justify projects being accorded priority, the following criteria should be taken into account:
projekt mora imeti evropsko razsežnost (= jasen javni interes EU),
the project must have a European dimension (= clear EU public interest),
nujnost projekta mora biti prikazana na podlagi hierarhije infrastrukture,
its necessity must be demonstrated on the basis of the infrastructure hierarchy,
projekt mora biti skladen s podnebnimi cilji, cilji energetske učinkovitosti in okoljskimi cilji,
it must be in line with climate, energy efficiency and environmental objectives,
mora biti skladen z dolgoročno energetsko politiko EU (ki omogoča prožno in večfunkcionalno izvajanje in izogibanje „učinkom zaklepanja“),
it must be consistent with long-term EU energy policy (allowing flexible and multifunctional application and avoiding lock-in effects),
mora nuditi dobro razmerje med stroški in koristi ter dobro stroškovno učinkovitost,
it must offer a good cost-benefit ratio and cost efficiency,
mora biti tehnično dovršen;
it must be technically sound;
meni, da za to, da bi omogočili nadaljnje določanje prednostnih projektov, bi morali upoštevati naslednja merila:
Takes the view that, to allow further prioritisation of projects, the following eligibility criteria should be taken into account:
ali projekt izboljšuje solidarnost med državami članicami,
whether solidarity between Member States is enhanced,
zrelost projektov,
the maturity of projects,
ali projekti minimalno vplivajo na okolje,
whether projects present minimal environmental impact,
ali zadevnemu prebivalstvu ponujajo najboljšo rešitev;
whether they offer the best solution for the public concerned;
poudarja pomen regionalnega sodelovanja pri načrtovanju, izvajanju in spremljanju opredeljenih prednostnih nalog ter pri pripravi naložbenih načrtov in posebnih projektov; meni, da se lahko obstoječe strategije za makroregije (kot sta Baltik ali Podonavje) uporabljajo kot modeli za platforme sodelovanja pri dogovarjanju in izvajanju energetskih projektov;
Underlines the importance of regional cooperation in the planning, implementation and monitoring of the established priorities and in drawing up investment plans and specific projects; believes that the existing strategies for macroregions (such as the Baltic and Danube regions) can also serve as models for cooperation platforms when agreeing and implementing energy projects;
poudarja, da je treba nujno pospešiti združevanje notranjega energetskega trga, predvsem s spodbujanjem projektov, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da bi sosednje države imele uravnoteženo nacionalno energetsko mešanico;
Points out that it is necessary to press ahead with the integration of the internal energy market by promoting, in particular, projects to ensure that neighbouring countries have a well balanced national energy mix;
poudarja, da je treba odstraniti ovire na področju konkurence in tržno usmerjenega razvoja vseh energetskih infrastruktur, vključno z daljinskim ogrevanjem in hlajenjem;
Stresses that obstacles to competition and market-driven development of all energy infrastructures, including district heating and cooling, must be removed;
opozarja, da geografske ovire, značilne za položaj otoških ozemelj, zelo otežujejo njihovo vključevanje v energetsko omrežje Unije in da jim je treba nameniti posebna sredstva za zmanjšanje njihove energetske odvisnosti, bodisi z razvojem njihovega notranjega potenciala na področju obnovljivih energij bodisi s spodbujanjem energijske učinkovitosti in varčevanja z energijo;
Reiterates that the geographical obstacles inherent to the location of island territories render their integration into the Union's energy network very difficult, and that they should be granted special facilities in order to reduce their energy dependency, either by developing their endogenous potential in renewable energy sources or by promoting energy efficiency and energy saving;
poudarja, da je treba izboljšati preglednost s pomočjo jasnega obveščanja javnosti glede namena in podatkov o tehničnem načrtovanju posameznega projekta; poziva, da je treba dokazila o skladnosti z merili preverjati v okviru javnih posvetovanj;
Emphasises that transparency should be enhanced by clearly informing the public about the purpose and technical planning data of each project; asks that proof of compliance with the criteria should be verified in the context of public consultations;
meni, da je treba poleg velikih infrastrukturnih projektov podpreti tudi manjše projekte, ki bi lahko imeli visoko dodano vrednost in bi jih bilo mogoče hitreje dokončati;
Considers that not only large infrastructure projects should be supported, but also smaller projects which could have a high added value and be more swiftly completed;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da projekti, ki se jim odobri status projektov v evropskem interesu, po odobritvi še naprej izpolnjujejo zgornja merila; meni, da je treba za vsakršno večjo spremembo projekta oceniti njegov status kot projekt v evropskem interesu;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that projects granted the status of PEI continue, after approval, to meet the criteria set out above; believes that, in the event of any major change to a project, its PEI status should be reviewed;
Hitri in pregledni postopki za izdajo dovoljenj
Fast and transparent permit-granting procedures
se strinja, da je treba zagotoviti pravočasno izvajanje projektov v evropskem interesu, in pozdravlja predlog Komisije za poenostavitev, boljše usklajevanje, izboljšanje in pospešitev postopkov za izdajo dovoljenj, vendar le ob spoštovanju načela subsidiarnosti in nacionalne pristojnosti za izdajo dovoljenj, da se zagotovi, da obstoječi roki na teh področjih ne bodo odvračali zasebnih vlagateljev od inovativnosti;
Agrees on the need to ensure timely implementation of PEIs and welcomes the Commission's proposal to streamline, enhance the coordination of, improve and speed up permit-granting procedures – provided that the subsidiarity principle and national competence in relation to permit-granting are respected – in order to ensure that existing deadlines in these fields do not discourage private investors from being innovative;
pozdravlja vzpostavitev nacionalnega kontaktnega organa („vse na enem mestu“) za vsak projekt evropskega interesa, ki bi deloval kot enotni upravni posrednik med izvajalci in različnimi organi, udeleženimi v postopku za izdajo dovoljenj; meni, da je treba v zvezi s čezmejnimi projekti zagotoviti nadaljnje usklajevanje med nacionalnimi točkami „vse na enem mestu“ in da mora imeti Komisija pri takšnem usklajevanju pomembnejšo vlogo; poudarja, da morajo Komisija in nacionalni organi pred ustanovitvijo novih enot „vse na enem mestu“ v celoti izkoristiti obstoječe institucije;
Welcomes the establishment of a national contact authority (one-stop shop) for each European interest project as a single administrative interface between developers and the various authorities involved in the authorisation procedure; takes the view that, with regard to cross-border projects, further coordination between national one-stop shops and an increased role for the Commission in such coordination should be ensured; points out that, before the creation of new one-stop-shops, the Commission and the national authorities must make full use of existing institutions;
poudarja, da morajo biti vsi nacionalni kontaktni organi neodvisni in in ne smejo biti pod političnim ali gospodarskim vplivom; meni, da je treba projekte v evropskem interesu obravnavati po vrstnem redu prejetja in v časovnem okviru, ki bo določen v prihodnjem predlogu Komisije;
Stresses that any national contact authority must be independent and free from political or economic influence; believes that PEIs must be processed in order of submission and within the time limit set out in the future Commission proposal;
poudarja pomen pravočasnega dokončanja projektov in visokokakovostnega dialoga med zainteresiranimi stranmi; spodbuja Komisijo, naj zagotovi sistem za izdajo opozoril (od manj pomembnih do resnih), če država članica prošnje za izdajo dovoljenja ne bi obravnavala v primernem roku, ter naj pozorno spremlja, ali nacionalni upravni postopki zagotavljajo pravilno in hitro izvajanje projekta evropskega interesa; v primeru težav pozdravlja uvedbo okvirnih časovnih omejitev, v okviru katerih morajo pristojni izvršni organi sprejeti dokončno odločitev; odločno poziva Komisijo, naj ob odsotnosti takšne odločitve razišče, ali je takšno zamudo mogoče razumeti kot poskus države članice, da ovira pravilno in hitro izvajanje notranjega trga EU z energijo;
Stresses the importance of timely finalisation of projects and high quality stakeholder dialogue; encourages the Commission to provide for a system of mild to serious warnings in the event that a Member State fails to process a permit application within a reasonable period of time, and to monitor closely whether national administrative procedures ensure the correct and rapid implementation of PEIs; welcomes, where difficulties are encountered, the introduction of indicative time limits within which the relevant competent authorities must reach a final decision; urges the Commission – in the absence of such a decision – to investigate whether the delay in question could be understood as an instance of the Member State impeding the correct and rapid implementation of the EU energy internal market;
poudarja, da je treba sprejeti pristop, ki bi v večji meri temeljil na sodelovanju, in priznava, da je zagotavljanje boljšega sprejemanja energetskih projektov s strani lokalnega prebivalstva tesno povezano z zagotavljanjem ustreznih informacij o namenu teh projektov ter z lokalno udeležbo v čim zgodnejši fazi razvoja takšnih projektov; poziva civilno družbo na vseh ravneh, nevladne organizacije, industrijo, socialne partnerje in potrošniške organizacije, naj sodelujejo v posvetovalnem postopku za projekte v evropskem interesu; poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi sistem posvetovanja in ocenjevanja za opredelitev in razširitev najboljših praks in znanja glede tega, da javnost soglaša z infrastrukturo;
Stresses the need for a more participatory approach, and recognises that securing greater acceptance by local people of energy infrastructure projects goes hand in hand with providing adequate information about the purpose of the projects, and with local involvement in their development at the earliest possible stage; calls for the participation, at all levels of civil society, of NGOs, industry, the social partners and consumer organisations in the consultation process for projects of European interest; calls on the Commission to set up a consultation and assessment system in order to identify and disseminate best practices and knowledge in relation to public acceptance of infrastructure;
glede na pomen, ki jih imajo regionalne strategije na področju trajnostne energije za razvojni potencial regij, poudarja, da je treba vzpostaviti platforme za izmenjavo najboljših praks, pridobljenih v regijah, pri čemer je treba upoštevati uspešne zglede občin in regij, ki so se specializirale na področju obnovljivih virov energije, varčevanja z energijo in energetske učinkovitosti; v zvezi s tem poziva k sistemu posvetovanja in ocenjevanja, da se po potrebi opredelijo, razširijo in posnemajo najboljše prakse in znanje o pridobivanju soglasja javnosti glede infrastrukture;
Stresses the need – given the importance of the regions' sustainable energy strategies to their development potential – to establish a platform for exchanging best practises acquired in the regions, taking into account successful examples of municipalities and regions that have specialised in renewable energies, energy saving and efficiency; calls, in this regard, for a consultation and assessment system in order, where possible, to identify, share and copy best practices and knowledge about public acceptance of infrastructure;
poudarja, da predstavlja največji izziv zagotavljanje soglasja lokalne javnosti za projekte energetske infrastrukture; je prepričan, da je soglasje in zaupanje javnosti ter nosilcev odločanja mogoče doseči le s pomočjo odprtih in preglednih razprav med pripravami na sprejemanje odločitev glede projektov energetske infrastrukture;
Emphasises that the greatest challenge lies in securing local public acceptance for energy infrastructure projects; is convinced that the acceptance and trust of members of the public and decision-makers can only be won by holding open and transparent debates in the run-up to decisions on energy infrastructure projects;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni, ali sta posodobitev in nadgradnja obstoječih energetskih koridorjev primernejši od odprtja novih koridorjev z vidika stroškovne učinkovitosti in soglasja javnosti;
Asks the Commission to evaluate whether the modernisation and upgrading of existing energy corridors is preferable to the creation of new corridors in terms of cost-efficiency and public acceptance;
priporoča širše obveščanje o pomenu energetskih omrežij v Evropski uniji; Komisijo poziva k razmisleku o evropski informativni in komunikacijski kampanji o energetskih omrežjih, ki bi se izvajala na nacionalni in lokalni ravni;
Advocates providing more information on the importance of energy networks in the European Union; asks the Commission to consider running an EU energy networks information and communication campaign tailored to suit national and local audiences;
ugotavlja, da so naložbe v omrežja ciklične narave in da jih je treba obravnavati glede na stanje v preteklosti; poudarja, da se stara velik delež infrastrukture, ki je bila v preteklih desetletjih zgrajena za medsebojno povezovanje centraliziranih elektrarn; poudarja, da bo družba pričakovala optimiziranje stroškov ohranjanja delovanja obstoječe infrastrukture in izgradnje nove infrastrukture prek javno-zasebnih partnerstev in prek razvoja inovativnih finančnih instrumentov; poudarja, da je treba natančno določiti potrebe na področju infrastrukture ter se izogniti vpetosti v presežne zmogljivosti ob polnem upoštevanju možnosti za doseganje stroškovno učinkovite energijske učinkovitosti;
Notes that grid investments are cyclical and should be viewed in a historical perspective; points out that much of the infrastructure built in recent decades to interconnect centralised power plants is ageing; points out that society will expect the cost of keeping existing infrastructure operational and deploying new infrastructure to be optimised through public-private partnerships and the development of innovative financing instruments; emphasises the need accurately to ascertain infrastructure requirements and avoid lock-in to surplus capacity by taking full account of cost-effective energy efficiency potential;
poudarja, da mora učinkovito delovanje trga financirati večino izdatkov za naložbe v zahtevano infrastrukturo na podlagi načel ustrezne porazdelitve stroškov, preglednosti, nediskriminacije in stroškovne učinkovitosti ter v skladu z načelom „uporabnik plača“; od Komisije zahteva, naj oceni, ali obstoječe regulativne spodbude zadostujejo, da se trgu pošlje potreben signal, in kakšne dopolnilne ukrepe potrebujemo, vključno s tistimi za boljša pravila glede porazdelitve stroškov;
Stresses that the effective functioning of the market should provide a large part of the cost of the requisite infrastructure investment, on the basis of principles of proper cost-allocation, transparency, non-discrimination and cost-effectiveness and in line with the ‘user pays’ principle; requests the Commission to assess where the existing regulatory incentives are sufficient to send the necessary signals to the market, and what complementary measures, including those improving cost allocation rules, are needed;
meni, da če ni nobene regulativne alternative in trg sam ne more zagotoviti potrebnih naložb, se lahko s sredstvi EU financirajo nekateri omejeni projekti evropskega interesa s posebnimi značilnostmi, zaradi katerih komercialno niso donosni, vendar je njihov razvoj potreben za uresničevanje ciljev energetske politike EU; meni, da bi lahko javno financiranje uporabili kot vzvod za zasebne naložbe z oblikovanjem inovativne mešanice finančnih instrumentov, če to ne izkrivlja konkurence;
Takes the view that, when no regulatory alternative is available and the market alone can not cover the investments needed, EU funding may be required to fund some limited PEIs the specific characteristics of which make them commercially unviable but the development of which is necessary to achieve EU energy policy objectives; considers that public funding may be used to lever private investment by setting up an innovative mix of financial instruments, provided that it does not distort competition;
ugotavlja, da Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj bistveno prispeva k financiranju projektov energetske infrastrukture in drugih projektov ter opozarja na bistveno vlogo kohezijske politike na lokalni in regionalni ravni, kar zadeva energetsko učinkovitost in doseganje ciljev EU glede obnovljivih virov energije;
Notes that the European Regional Development Fund makes a massive contribution to the funding of energy – and other – infrastructure projects and points out the significant role of cohesion policy at local and regional level in relation to energy efficiency and achievement of the Union's renewable energy targets;
poudarja, da kohezijski in strukturni skladi morajo imeti še naprej osrednjo vlogo pri naših infrastrukturnih projektih; meni, da bi bil kakršen koli poskus ustvarjanja novih sektorskih skladov s sredstvi kohezijske politike zgrešen;
Stresses that the cohesion and structural funds should continue to be central to our infrastructure projects; believes any attempt to create new sectoral funds from cohesion policy funds to be misguided;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo financiranje naložb v infrastrukturo tržno zasnovano, da bi tako preprečili izkrivljanje konkurence in ustvarjanje napačnih spodbud za naložbe, vendar pod pogojem, da se tudi zagotovi javni interes, zlasti na regionalni in lokalni ravni ter na ozemljih s posebnimi geografskimi značilnostmi, kot so otoki, gorate regije in zelo redko poseljene regije, in sicer s pomočjo omejenega zneska javnih finančnih sredstev, ki mora privesti do inovativne mešanice finančnih instrumentov, s katero pritegnemo zasebne naložbe;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that financing of infrastructure investments is market-based in order to prevent distortions of competition and the creation of false incentives for investment, and that unjustified fluctuations between Member States are avoided, provided, however, that public interest – especially at local and regional level and in territories with specific geographical features such as islands, mountainous regions and regions with very low population density – is also safeguarded through a limited amount of public finance which has to result in an innovative mix of financial instruments that levers private investment;
meni, da bi morala Evropska unija financirati trgovinsko neprivlačne projekte, ki niso zmožni pritegniti zasebnih vlagateljev, vendar so z energetskega vidika bistveni za medsebojno povezovanje izoliranih regij EU z evropskimi elektroenergetskimi in plinskimi omrežji, kot sestavni del oblikovanja enotnega trga z energijo v Evropski uniji;
Considers that the European Union should fund commercially unattractive projects that are unable to attract private investors but that are essential for the interconnection of isolated EU regions to the European power and gas grids, as an integral part of the creation of a unified energy market in the European Union;
poziva Komisijo, da javno financiranje omogoči samo državam članicam, ki so v celoti prenesle veljavno zakonodajo EU in jo pravilno uporabljajo, vključno z regulativnimi predpisi, ki so določeni v tretjem svežnju o notranjem trgu;
Calls on the Commission to allow public funding only for Member States which have fully implemented and correctly apply existing EU legislation, including the regulatory provisions laid down in the third internal market package;
poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda pravila o državni pomoči v zvezi z energetsko infrastrukturo in po potrebi predloži predloge o spremembi teh pravil, da bi državam članicam omogočala spodbujanje modernizacije infrastrukture; hkrati poziva Komisijo, naj izda nov dokument s smernicami o javnem financiranju projektov in trenutni zakonodaji o državni pomoči, ki določa jasna merila za javno financiranje energetske infrastrukture; poudarja, da morajo ta dokument pripraviti skupaj GD za energetiko, GD za konkurenco in GD za regionalni razvoj, da se prepreči kakršna koli neskladnost s pravili Komisije;
Calls on the Commission to review state-aid rules in relation to energy infrastructure and if necessary, to bring forward proposals to amend these rules to allow states to encourage the modernisation of infrastructure; calls on the Commission, at the same time, to issue a new guideline document on public financing of projects and current state-aid legislation, setting out clear criteria for the public funding of energy infrastructure; stresses that this document must be developed jointly by DG Energy, DG Competition and DG Regional Development in order to eliminate any inconsistency in the Commission rules;
zahteva, da se na podlagi strateških ciljev upošteva geografsko načelo glede prihodnjih energetskih subvencij na področju infrastrukture ter raziskav in razvoja; poleg tega vztraja, da že razvite regije pridobijo subvencije za raziskave in razvoj le, če subvencionirano dejavnost izvajajo skupaj z manj razvitimi regijami;
Calls, on the basis of the strategic objectives, for the geographical principle to be taken into account in relation to future energy subsidies in the areas of infrastructure and R&D; insists, furthermore, that developed regions should receive further R&D subsidies only if the subsidised activity is conducted in conjunction with less-developed regions;
poudarja, da je stabilen, predvidljiv in ustrezen zakonodajni okvir, vključno z ustrezno stopnjo donosa in spodbudami za novo infrastrukturo, bistven za spodbujanje naložb v prenos in distribucijo; poudarja, da bi morali regulatorji spodbujati izvajanje novih tehnologij s pomočjo tržnih spodbud in pilotnih projektov;
Emphasises that a stable, predictable and appropriate regulatory framework, including appropriate rates of return and incentives for new infrastructure, is crucial in order to promote investment in both transmission and distribution; stresses that regulators should foster the implementation of new technologies through market incentives and pilot projects;