natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker Unija v skladu s členom 174 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, da bi pospešila svoj vsesplošni skladni razvoj, razvija in izvaja tiste svoje dejavnosti, ki vodijo h krepitvi njene ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije, ter ker si Unija še posebej prizadeva zmanjšati neskladje med stopnjami razvitosti različnih regij in zaostalost regij z najbolj omejenimi možnostmi, kot so podeželska območja, območja, ki jih je prizadela industrijska tranzicija, in regije, ki so hudo in stalno prizadete zaradi neugodnih naravnih ali demografskih razmer, in ker je treba upoštevati strategijo EU 2020, da bi Unija postala pametno, trajnostno in vključujoče gospodarstvo;
whereas, according to Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in order to promote its overall harmonious development, the Union shall develop and pursue its actions leading to the strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion, and in particular shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions such as rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicap, and whereas the EU 2020 Strategy has to be taken into account to ensure that the EU becomes a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy,
ker ima kohezijska politika ključno vlogo na poti k polnemu doseganju ciljev EU 2020, zlasti na področju zaposlovanja in socialnih zadev, na vseh ravneh upravljanja in na vseh geografskih območjih,
whereas cohesion policy plays a pivotal role on the way towards full achievement of the EU 2020 goals, in particular in the field of employment and social affairs, at all governance levels and in all geographical areas,
ker je strateška razsežnost kohezijske politike, ki zagotavlja skladnost s prednostnimi nalogami Evropske unije – povečati privlačnost Evrope in njenih regij kot kraja za vlaganje in delo, izboljšati znanje in inovativnost za rast ter ustvariti več delovnih mest, ki naj bodo boljša –, določena in poudarjena v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 (v nadaljevanju splošna uredba), strateških smernicah Skupnosti o koheziji (v nadaljevanju strateške smernice), nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirih in operativnih programih,
whereas the strategic dimension of cohesion policy guaranteeing consistency with the European Union's priorities – making Europe and its regions more attractive places in which to invest and work, improving knowledge and innovation for growth and creating more and better jobs – is provided and highlighted through Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 (hereinafter: the General Regulation), the Community strategic guidelines on cohesion (hereinafter: the Strategic Guidelines), the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) and the Operational Programmes (OP),
ker strateško poročanje predstavlja nov instrument v kohezijski politiki, ki je bil uveden v sedanjem programskem obdobju s splošno uredbo kot instrument za pregled izvajanja strateških smernic, ki skuša povečati strateške vsebine in spodbujati preglednost in odgovornost kohezijske politike, in ker je treba na podlagi pridobljenih informacij in izkušenj izpeljati ustrezne zaključke za načrtovanje naslednjega programskega obdobja,
whereas the strategic reporting exercise represents a new instrument of cohesion policy, introduced in the present programming period through the General Regulation as an instrument for examining the implementation of Strategic Guidelines, aiming at increasing the strategic content and promoting the transparency and accountability of cohesion policy, and whereas lessons should be learnt from the information and experience gained when planning the next programming period;
ker so med dogovorjenimi 86 prednostnimi programi za financiranje, predvideno v okviru lizbonske strategije, podskupine, opredeljene kot posebne prednostne naloge v lizbonski agendi za rast in delovna mesta, ker je za regije s konvergenčnim ciljem predvidenih 47 prednostnih tem za prednostno financiranje, medtem ko je za regije s ciljem regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja opredeljenih zgolj 33 prednostnih tem,
whereas Lisbon earmarking is the exercise whereby subsets of the agreed 86 priority schemes were identified as specific priorities under the Lisbon Growth and Jobs Agenda and whereas, for the Convergence objective regions, 47 priority themes were identified as earmarked priorities, while in Regional Competitiveness and Employment objective regions only 33 priority themes were identified,
ker so se Komisija in države članice dogovorile, da si bodo pri nacionalnih strateških poročilih za leto 2009 izmenjale zgolj podatke o prednostnih temah po ciljih, za prenos podatkov pa so določile ciljni datum 30. september 2009, ko so se države članice še vedno spopadale s posledicami gospodarske krize, pri čemer so se nekatere soočale z začetnimi težavami na začetku programskega obdobja, in ker obstaja upanje, da bo strateško poročilo za leto 2013 ponudilo več koristnih podatkov,
whereas for the 2009 national strategic reports, the Commission and the Member States agreed to exchange data only on the priority themes by objective, with a target date of 30 September 2009 for extraction, a date when Member States were still suffering from the effects of the economic crisis, with some facing initial difficulties at the beginning of the programming period, and whereas it is expected that more informative data can be gleaned from the 2013 Strategic Report,
ker se evropske regije še vedno spopadajo z velikimi gospodarskimi, socialnimi in okoljskimi neenakostmi, ki so deloma naravna posledica zadnjih dveh širitev, deloma pa je nanje neposredno vplivala svetovna finančna in gospodarska kriza, čeprav je kohezijska politika v zadnjih desetih letih dejavno prispevala k njihovemu zmanjšanju, ki je nujno za zagotovitev konkurenčnosti in gospodarske rasti ob upoštevanju regionalnih posebnosti;
whereas European regions are still facing striking economic, social and environmental disparities, partly as a natural consequence of the last two enlargements and also due to the direct effects of the global financial and economic crisis, even though these disparities have shrunk over the past decade through the active contribution of cohesion policy which is crucial for ensuring competitiveness and economic growth while taking into account regional specificities;
ker je kohezijska politika glavni element evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva in odraža pomen strukturnih skladov kot orodja za gospodarske spodbude zlasti za mala podjetja, trajnost in energetsko učinkovitost, ter ker je bila Komisija pozvana, da leta 2010 predstavi poročilo o izvajanju ukrepov, sprejetih kot del evropskega odgovora na krizo,
whereas cohesion policy has been a key element of the European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP), demonstrating the importance of the Structural Funds as tools of economic stimulus, in particular for small businesses, sustainability and energy efficiency, and whereas the Commission was asked to present a report in 2010 about the uptake of measures adopted as part of Europe's response to the crisis,
pozdravlja strateško poročilo Komisije o izvajanju programov kohezijske politike, sofinanciranih iz strukturnih skladov; čestita državam članicam za prizadevanja pri pripravi prvih nacionalnih strateških poročil, ki so se izkazala za dragocen vir informacij o izvajanju;
Welcomes the Commission's strategic report on the implementation of the cohesion policy programmes co-financed by the Structural Funds; congratulates Member States on their efforts to prepare their first national strategic reports, which have proved to be a valuable source of information on implementation;
poudarja, da je v primerjalnih analizah treba upoštevati, da je pet držav članic svoje podatke prenašalo na kasnejši datum, ena pa na zgodnejšega; meni, da je bolj ustrezno primerjati napredek, ki so ga posamezne države članice dosegle v primerjavi s povprečjem EU;
Points out that, when making comparative analyses, it should be taken into consideration that five Member States extracted their data at a more recent date and one at an earlier date; considers that it is more appropriate to compare the progress made by individual Member States with the EU average;
meni, da preglednost pri dodeljevanju sredstev spodbuja pravilno izvajanje in je pomemben predpogoj za doseganje skupnih ciljev kohezijske politike, zato jo je treba okrepiti na vseh stopnjah izvajanja; je prepričan, da je razkrivanje podatkov o prejemnikih, zlasti na spletu, treba še naprej uporabljati, saj je učinkovito orodje za izboljšanje preglednosti; meni, da se je zaradi določitve smernic Skupnosti in uvedbe novega instrumenta strateškega poročanja povečala odgovornost za doseganje ciljev politike; v zvezi s tem poziva k redni politični razpravi za izboljšanje preglednosti, odgovornosti in ocene učinkov kohezijske politike;
Considers that transparency in the allocation of funds fosters correct implementation and is a key precondition for achieving the overall objectives of cohesion policy and as such needs to be reinforced at all stages of implementation; believes that disclosure of the list of beneficiaries should be continued, notably online, as it is an efficient tool to improve transparency; takes the view that setting Community guidelines and introducing strategic reporting as a new instrument have contributed to increased accountability in delivering policy objectives; calls in this context for regular political debate in order to improve transparency, accountability and assessment of the effects of cohesion policy;
ugotavlja, da finančna sredstva za izbrane projekte znašajo 93,4 milijarde EUR, kar predstavlja 27,1 % razpoložljivih sredstev EU za sedanje obdobje, in da ta povprečna stopnja velja za tri cilje kohezijske politike, za kategorije, predvidene za financiranje v okviru lizbonske strategije, ter za napredek pri izvajanju strateških smernic Skupnosti; vendar poudarja, da se napredek med državami in med temami zelo razlikuje, s splošnimi stopnjami izbiranja projektov nad 40 % v 9 državah članicah in pod 20 % v 4 državah članicah;
Notes that the reported financial volume of projects selected is EUR 93,4 billion, representing 27,1% of available EU resources in the current period, and that this average rate applies to the three cohesion policy objectives as well as to the Lisbon earmarking categories and to the progress in implementing the Community Strategic Guidelines; underlines, however, that progress varies widely between countries and across themes, with aggregate selection rates above 40% in the case of 9 Member States and below 20% for 4 Member States;
ugotavlja, da je pri temah strateških smernic Skupnosti stopnja napredka najvišja pri temi teritorialne dimenzije (30 %), nadpovprečna je pri izboljšanju znanja in inovativnosti za rast, pod 27,1 % pa je pri drugih dveh smernicah, poleg tega pa da so stopnje izbiranja nadpovprečne za projekte, predvidene za financiranje v okviru lizbonske strategije, iz konvergenčnega cilja ter cilja regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja, zgolj 20,5 % pa za cilj evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja; obžaluje, da se je analiza učinkovitosti politike, predstavljena v strateškem poročilu, izkazala za resno omejeno, ker ni kazalnikov učinka in rezultatov za vse države članice; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči upravne zahteve za poročanje, in poziva države članice, naj bodo bolj dosledne pri zagotavljanju podatkov o izvajanju programa;
Notes that the progress rate among CSG themes is highest in the Territorial Dimension theme (30%), above average for ‘Improving knowledge and innovation for growth’, but below 27,1% in the case of the other two guidelines and that, moreover, selection rates are above average for Lisbon earmarked projects in both Convergence and Regional Competitiveness and Employment objectives, but amount only to 20,5% in the European Territorial Cooperation objective; regrets that, in the absence of output and result indicators for all Member States, the analysis of policy performance as presented in the strategic report has proved to have serious limitations; calls on the Commission, therefore, to review its administrative reporting requirements and calls on the Member States to be more disciplined about providing data on programme implementation;
glede na gospodarsko krizo in naraščajoče število brezposelnih pozdravlja že doseženi napredek pri izvajanju projektov, pomembnih za smernico „več delovnih mest in boljša delovna mesta“; vendar močno priporoča, naj Komisija uvede metode za sodelovanje z državami članicami, ki bodo olajšale pravočasno uporabo in učinkovito porazdelitev vseh potrebnih sredstev za uresničitev konkurenčnega gospodarstva z učinkovito izrabo virov ter gospodarstva z vključujočo rastjo in visoko stopnjo zaposlenosti, ki bo omogočalo socialno in teritorialno kohezijo ter zmanjšanje revščine, kar so prednostne naloge strategije EU 2020 in njenih ciljev, zlasti na področju zaposlovanja in socialnih zadev, da bi pospešili rast in produktivnost ter izboljšali uspešnost zaposlovanja v Evropi;
Welcomes the progress already made in implementing projects relevant to the ‘More and better jobs’ Guideline, in view of the economic crisis and the growing number of unemployed; strongly recommends, however, that the Commission introduce methods for cooperating with the Member States that will make it easier for all necessary funding to be promptly mobilised and allocated efficiently for the achievement of a resource-efficient and competitive economy, inclusive growth and a high-employment economy delivering social and territorial cohesion and poverty reduction, which are priority targets of the EU 2020 Strategy and its objectives, in particular in the field of employment and social affairs, in order to boost growth and productivity and improve employment performance in Europe;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bila podpora Evropskega socialnega sklada koristna pri izvajanju reform trga dela in da se je Evropski socialni sklad izkazal za učinkovito orodje, ki prispeva k prehodu s pasivnih na aktivne in celo preventivne politike trga dela; poziva države članice, naj nadaljujejo strukturne reforme, ki bodo trge dela zaščitile pred morebitno prihodnjo krizo;
Welcomes the fact that the ESF has provided relevant support to implement labour market reforms and proved to be an effective instrument contributing to the shift from passive to active and even preventive labour market policies; calls on the Member States to continue with structural reforms that will safeguard labour markets against a potential future crisis;
opozarja, da je približno 23,7 % (82 milijard EUR) sredstev iz strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov za obdobje 2007–2013 namenjenih za promet, vendar bo le polovica porabljena za projekte TEN-T (17 milijard EUR za prednostno omrežje TEN-T in 27,2 milijarde EUR za splošni del), druga polovica pa bo namenjena naložbam v nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne projekte, ki niso označeni na zemljevidih TEN-T; poudarja, da se kohezijska in strukturna sredstva za promet delijo med vrste prevoza in prometna omrežja, ne da bi se pri tem ustrezno upoštevali cilji Evropske unije;
Recalls that about 23,7% (EUR 82 billion) of the Cohesion and Structural Funds allocation for 2007-2013 is intended for transport, but only half of it will be spent on TEN-T projects (EUR 17 billion on the TEN-T priority network and EUR 27,2 billion for the comprehensive part), with the other half being earmarked for investment in national, regional and local projects not indicated on the TEN-T maps; stresses that cohesion and structural funding allocated to transport is distributed between transport modes and networks in a way which takes insufficient account of the objectives of the European Union;
pozdravlja vključitev izdatkov za naložbe v energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije pri gradnji stanovanj ter stanovanjskih projektov za marginalizirane skupnosti, kar se v veliko regijah uspešno izvaja in bi se moralo nadaljevati v prihodnje;
Welcomes the inclusion of expenditure for investment in energy efficiency and renewable energy in housing construction and housing projects for marginalised communities, which is successfully being implemented in many regions and should be continued in the future;
poziva k učinkovitejšemu izvajanju programov v okoljskem sektorju, zlasti na transverzalnih področjih, ki zagotavljajo evropsko dodano vrednost, kot so boj proti podnebnim spremembam, njihovo blaženje in prilagajanje nanje, naložbe v čistejše in nizkoogljične tehnologije, boj proti onesnaževanju zraka in vode, zaščita biotske raznovrstnosti, širitev železniških omrežij, spodbujanje energetske učinkovitosti, zlasti v gradbenem sektorju, in obnovljivih virov energije, da bi uresničili cilje EU 2020 ter spodbudili ustvarjanje zelenih delovnih mest in zelenega gospodarstva;
Calls for more effective implementation of programmes in the environmental sector, especially in cross-cutting areas which provide European added value, such as action to combat, mitigate and adapt to climate change, investment in cleaner and low-carbon technologies, action to combat air and water pollution, action for biodiversity protection, the expansion of railway networks, the promotion of energy efficiency, especially in the building sector, and renewable energy sources endeavouring to achieve the EU 2020 targets and promote the creation of green jobs and a green economy;
poziva k uporabi finančnih sredstev, s katerimi bi prispevali k preprečevanju okoljskih katastrof in/ali hitremu odzivanju nanje, in poziva države članice, naj povečajo naložbe na področju preprečevanja ter na področju sanacije industrijskih območij in kontaminiranih zemljišč glede na nizko stopnjo izvajanja teh naložb;
Calls for the relevant funds to be used for environmental disaster prevention and/or rapid reaction and calls on the Member States to speed up investment in prevention and in the rehabilitation of industrial sites and contaminated land, given the low rate of implementation;
obžaluje zamude pri izbiranju projektov na strateških področjih, kot so železniški sektor, nekatere energetske in okoljske naložbe, digitalno gospodarstvo, socialna vključenost, upravljanje in razvoj zmogljivosti, ter zahteva, da se temeljito analizirajo vzroki za zamude, in hkrati vabi države članice, naj vključijo svoje regije v boljše spremljanje področij, na katerih je treba okrepiti prizadevanja; po drugi strani izpostavlja višjo stopnjo absorpcije pri okoljskih projektih v programih evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja ter v zvezi s tem opozarja na nedvomno dodano vrednost sodelovanja; vendar poudarja, da so morda države članice na področjih, kjer je izvajanje potekalo z zamudo, to nadoknadile, tako da zamuda ob navedenem času ni nujno pokazatelj splošne kakovosti v programskem obdobju; v zvezi s tem poudarja večanje absorpcijskih zmogljivosti in proračunsko izvrševanje kohezijske politike v letu 2010, ki med drugim izvirata iz nedavnih zakonskih sprememb in iz operativnih programov, ki so končno dosegli potovalno hitrost, saj je Komisija odobrila še zadnje sisteme upravljanja in nadzora;
Regrets the delays in project selection for strategic areas such as the rail sector, certain energy and environmental investments, the digital economy, social inclusion, governance and capacity building, and calls for a thorough analysis of the causes of these delays, while also inviting the Member States to involve their regions in closer monitoring of areas where efforts need reinforcement; highlights on the other hand the higher absorption rate of environmental projects in European Territorial Cooperation programmes, and points to the clear added value of cooperation in this context; underlines, however, that Member States may have caught up in areas where implementation was lagging behind, and that therefore delays at this particular stage need not be indicative of overall quality in the programming period; points in this context to the acceleration in absorption capacities and budgetary implementation of cohesion policy during 2010 which stems, inter alia, from recent legislative changes and from operational programmes reaching cruising speed, the last Management and Control Systems having finally been approved by the Commission;
meni, da je treba takoj sprejeti korektivne ukrepe za izboljšanje slabih rezultatov na nekaterih prednostnih področjih; priporoča izvedbo poglobljene analize težav z izvajanjem na tistih področjih, kjer je prišlo do posebnih zamud pri izbiri projektov, ter v zvezi s tem poziva države članice, naj okrepijo prizadevanja za boljše izbiranje projektov pri temah, kjer so zamude, in naj pospešijo izvajanje vseh izbranih projektov, da bi se izognili tveganju, da se dogovorjeni cilji ne uresničijo;
Believes that corrective measures need to be promptly taken to improve poor performance in some priority areas; recommends carrying out an in-depth analysis of the implementation problems in areas with specific delays in project selection and calls on Member States in this context to step up efforts to improve project selection in the delayed themes, and to accelerate implementation of all selected projects to avoid the risk of not reaching the agreed objectives;
meni, da so v nekaterih primerih hitra izbira in izvajanje projektov ter splošno boljše izkoriščanje dodeljenih sredstev posebej potrebni za dejavnosti, ki so usmerjene v izboljšanje človeškega kapitala, pospeševanje zdravja in preprečevanje bolezni, zagotavljanje enakih možnosti, podporo trgom dela in okrepitev socialne vključenosti, zlasti da se premagajo negativni učinki gospodarske krize;
Considers that in some cases rapid project selection and implementation and an overall better use of the allocated funds is particularly needed for the activities aimed at improving human capital, promoting health and fostering disease prevention, ensuring equal opportunities, supporting labour markets and enhancing social inclusion, especially in order to overcome the negative impacts of the economic crisis;
poudarja, da se mnogo držav članic strinja, da je disciplina, ki jo je vzpostavilo dodeljevanje sredstev, izboljšala kakovost in osredotočenost programov; poleg tega ugotavlja, da so države članice soglašale, da je ohranitev temeljnih prednostnih nalog njihovih nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirov in operativnih programov, povezanih z lizbonsko strategijo, najboljše orodje za boj proti krizi, in ponovno poudarile pomen srednje- in dolgoročnih ciljev, ki so navedeni v teh dokumentih;
Highlights the fact that several Member States confirmed that the discipline imposed by the earmarking exercise has improved the quality and focus of programming; notes, moreover, that Member States unanimously considered that maintaining fundamental priorities of their National Strategic Reference Frameworks and Operational Programmes linked to the Lisbon Strategy is the best instrument to tackle the crisis, and reconfirmed the relevance of the medium- and long-term objectives set out in these documents;
Izzivi pri izvajanju
Challenges in implementation