natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da bi bilo treba ohraniti sedanjo razdelitev storitev na kategoriji A in B, kolikor so „lažje“ določbe za storitve B utemeljene z značilnostmi te kategorije, in sicer da se storitve zagotavljajo večinoma lokalno ali regionalno; poziva Komisijo, naj razvije orodja, s katerimi bodo lokalni in regionalni organi lažje določili, v katero kategorijo sodijo konkretne naročene naloge;
Emphasises that the current classification of A and B service categories should be maintained in so far as ‘lighter’ provisions for B services have their justification in the characteristics of that category as mainly locally or regionally provided services; calls on the Commission to develop tools that make it easier for local and regional authorities to decide to which category specific contract tasks belong;
v tem okviru ugotavlja, da uporaba zakonodaje s področja javnih naročil pri opravljanju osebnih socialnih storitev pogosto ni najboljša za doseganje optimalnih rezultatov za uporabnike zadevnih storitev; zahteva, da se v okviru evropskega prava priznajo preskušeni postopki držav članic, ki temeljijo na načelu, da mora biti vsem ponudnikom, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje, ki so bili predhodno določeni z zakonom, omogočeno izvajanje storitev, ne glede na njihovo pravno obliko, pri čemer je treba upoštevati splošna načela enakega obravnavanja, preglednosti in nediskriminacije;
Observes, in this context, that the application of procurement law to the provision of personal social services is often not the best way of ensuring optimum results for the users of the services in question; calls for recognition under European law of tried and tested Member State procedures based on the principle that all providers able to comply with the conditions previously laid down by law should, irrespective of their legal form, be permitted to provide services, provided that account is taken of the general principles of equal treatment, transparency and non-discrimination;
poudarja, da bi se bilo treba izogibati uvedbi novih pravil za trge javnih naročil pod pragovi EU, ker bi lahko ogrozila pravno varnost, vzpostavljeno na nacionalni ravni;
Emphasises that the introduction of new rules for public procurement markets below the EU thresholds should be avoided, as it may jeopardise legal certainty established at national level;
poziva Komisijo, naj uskladi direktivo o pravnih sredstvih z novim okvirom o javnih naročilih, ki bo nastal po tem pregledu, in to opravi vzporedno z glavnim zakonodajnim predlogom, da se zagotovi skladnost;
Calls on the Commission to align the Remedies Directive with the new public procurement framework which will emerge following the current review, and to carry out this exercise in parallel to the main legislative proposal, in order to ensure consistency;
poudarja odgovornost Komisije za spremljanje ustreznega prenosa direktiv EU v zakonodajo držav članic;
Stresses the Commission's responsibility for monitoring the correct transposition of EU directives in the Member States;
Druga naloga: razvoj celotnega potenciala javnih naročil – najboljše razmerje med ceno in storitvijo
Second task: developing the full potential of public procurement – best value for money
meni, da za razvoj celotnega potenciala javnih naročil merilo najnižje cene ne bi več smelo biti odločilno za dodelitev javnega naročila in da bi ga v splošnem moralo nadomestiti merilo ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe v smislu ekonomskih, socialnih in okoljskih koristi, pri čemer se upoštevajo stroški ustreznega blaga, storitev ali gradenj skozi njihovo celotno življenjsko dobo; poudarja, da to ne bi izključevalo najnižje cene kot odločilnega merila v primeru visoko standardiziranega blaga ali storitev; poziva Komisijo, naj v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami razvije metodologijo za izračun stroškov skozi celotno življenjsko dobo na obsežni in neobvezni podlagi; poudarja, da bi s podporo merilu „največje možne gospodarske koristi“ spodbudili inovacije in prizadevanja za doseganje najboljše kakovosti in vrednosti, tj. za izpolnjevanje zahtev iz strategije Evropa 2020; poudarja, da je to posebej pomembno v zvezi z javnimi naročili za blago, ki vpliva na zdravje potrošnikov, na primer v živilskem sektorju, kjer igrata pomembno vlogo kakovost in način proizvodnje; poudarja, da bi morala biti pravila o javnih naročilih dovolj prožna, da bi lahko imeli pasivni potrošniki, na primer v bolnišnicah, domovih za ostarele, šolah in vrtcih, enakovreden dostop do zdrave in cenovno ugodne hrane in ne le do najcenejše možnosti, ki je na voljo;
Takes the view that, in order to develop the full potential of public procurement, the criterion of lowest price should no longer be the determining one for the award of contracts, and that it should, in general, be replaced by the criterion of most economically advantageous tender, in terms of economic, social and environmental benefits – taking into account the entire life-cycle costs of the relevant goods, services or works; stresses that this would not exclude the lowest price as a decisive criterion in the case of highly standardised goods or services; asks the Commission to develop, in close cooperation with the Member States, a methodology for the calculation of life-cycle costs on a broad and non-obligatory basis; stresses that supporting the criterion of ‘maximum economic benefit’ would foster innovation and efforts to achieve the best quality and value, i.e. to comply with the requirements of the Europe 2020 strategy; stresses that this is particularly relevant in relation to public procurement of goods that have an impact on consumers' health – in the food sector, for example – where quality and production methods play an important role; emphasises that public procurement rules should be flexible enough to ensure that passive consumers, for example in hospitals, care facilities for the elderly, schools and kindergartens, have equal access to healthy, value-for-money food, rather than merely the cheapest available option;
priznava, da bi lahko bilo učinkovito uporabljeno javno naročanje resnično gonilo za spodbujanje kakovostnih delovnih mest, plač in pogojev, pa tudi za enakost, razvoj znanj, usposabljanje, spodbujanje okoljske politike ter zagotavljanje spodbud za raziskave in inovacije; poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja vlade in naročnike k večji uporabi trajnostnih javnih naročil, ki podpirajo in spodbujajo visokokakovostno zaposlovanje ter zagotavljajo kakovostne storitve in blago v Evropi; vabi Komisijo, naj nadzoruje, kako javna naročila prispevajo k doseganju širših ciljev EU, in navede, kaj bi bilo treba storiti, da se ti cilji v prihodnje izboljšajo;
Recognises that public procurement, if used effectively, could be a real driver in promoting quality jobs, wages and conditions as well as equality, in developing skills and training, in promoting environmental policies, and in providing incentives for research and innovation; calls on the Commission to encourage governments and contracting authorities to increase the use of sustainable public procurement, supporting and promoting high-quality employment and providing quality services and goods in Europe; invites the Commission to scrutinise how public procurement has contributed to achieving the EU's wider goals and to outline what should be done to improve these objectives in the future;
ponavlja, da so predkomercialna javna naročila premalo uporabljeno orodje, ki lahko spodbuja inovacije v javnih naročilih in znatno prispeva k določanju in vzpostavljanju vodilnih trgov ter izboljšanju dostopa malih in srednjih podjetij do javnih naročil; meni tudi, da predlagani model delitve tveganja in koristi (IPR) v predkomercialnih naročilih terja pravno pojasnitev in poenostavitev, da bi se naročnikom omogočila redna in učinkovita uporaba tega orodja; v skladu s tem poziva Komisijo, naj za spodbuditev rabe predkomercialnih naročil v okviru celovite revizije predlaga prilagoditev ustreznih pravil o javnih naročilih ali državni pomoči;
Recalls that pre-commercial procurement is an underused tool, which can drive innovation in public procurement and make a significant contribution to identifying and establishing lead markets and improving SME access to public procurement; considers furthermore that the proposed model of risk and benefit (IPR) sharing in pre-commercial procurement requires both legal clarification and simplification in order to enable regular and effective use of this tool by procurement practitioners; accordingly, calls on the Commission to propose an adaptation of the relevant procurement or state aid rules as part of the overall revision exercise, in order to boost the take-up of pre-commercial procurement;
je seznanjen s pomenom standardov za javna naročila, ker lahko pomagajo javnim naročnikom dosegati cilje politike na učinkovit in pregleden način; v zvezi s tem poziva k razvoju redno posodabljane zbirke podatkov za standarde, zlasti v zvezi z okoljskimi in družbenimi merili, ki bi bila na razpolago javnim organom, da bi imeli naročniki pri pripravi razpisov na razpolago ustrezne smernice in jasna pravila, da bi lahko enostavno preverili njihovo skladnost z ustreznimi standardi;
Notes the importance of standards for public procurement, in that they can help public procurers to meet their policy objectives in an effective and transparent way; calls, in that regard, for the development of a regularly updated database of standards, especially in relation to environmental and social criteria, to be made available to public authorities, in order to ensure that procurers, when drawing up tenders, have access to appropriate guidance and a clear set of rules so that they can easily verify their compliance with relevant standards;
poziva k večjemu zanašanju na nediskriminatorne in odprte standarde na področju javnih naročil v podporo ciljem v zvezi s poenostavitvijo in inovacijami, zlasti glede dostopnosti, informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije in okolja;
Calls for increased reliance on non-discriminatory and open standards in public procurement, in the interests of the simplification and innovation objectives, particularly in the areas of accessibility, ICT, and the environment;
poudarja, da se dejstvo, ali sta bila proizvod ali storitev proizvedena trajnostno, upravičeno šteje za značilnost proizvoda, ki jo je mogoče uporabiti kot merilo za primerjavo s proizvodi ali storitvami, ki niso bili proizvedeni trajnostno, da bi tako naročnikom omogočili, da nadzorujejo okoljske in socialne učinke oddanih naročil na pregleden način, hkrati pa ne bi oslabili nujne povezave s predmetom naročila; opozarja, da bi bilo treba pojasniti okvir za vključevanje zahtev v zvezi s proizvodnim postopkom v tehnične specifikacije za vse vrste pogodb, kadar je to primerno in sorazmerno; opozarja na zadevo Wienstrom, ki je postala klasičen primer tega, kako in zakaj je mogoče proizvodne značilnosti opredeliti kot tehnične specifikacije;
Underlines the fact that whether or not a product or service has been sustainably produced is rightly considered to be a characteristic of the product, which can be used as a criterion for comparison with products or services that have not been sustainably produced, so as to enable contracting authorities to control the environmental and social impact of contracts awarded by them in a transparent way but at the same time not to weaken the necessary link to the subject matter of the contract; points out the need to clarify the scope for including requirements relating to the production process in the technical specifications for all types of contract, where relevant and proportionate; points to the Wienstrom case, which has become the classic example of how and why production characteristics can be categorised as technical specifications;
poudarja potrebo po krepitvi trajnostne razsežnosti javnih naročil tako, da se ji omogoči vključevanje na vseh stopnjah procesa javnih naročil (to je preskus sposobnosti, tehnične specifikacije, klavzule o izvedbi naročil);
Underlines the need to strengthen the sustainability dimension of public procurement by allowing it to be integrated at each stage of the procurement process (i.e. ability test, technical specifications, contract performance clauses);
opozarja, da bi morali javni naročniki v odziv na večjo ozaveščenost o vplivu blaga, gradenj in storitev na okolje in podnebje vključiti okoljske stroške v svojo oceno „ekonomsko najugodnejše ponudbe“ in svoj izračun stroškov skozi celotno življenjsko dobo;
Points out that, in response to increased awareness of the environmental and climate impact of goods, works and services, procurement authorities should include environmental costs in their assessment of the ‘most economically advantageous offer’ and their calculation of life-cycle costs;
ugotavlja, da mora biti besedilo direktiv bolj jasno glede izboljšanja dostopa za invalide;
Notes that the text of the directives needs to be more specific in terms of improving access for people with disabilities;
meni, da je treba veljavne določbe o oddajanju del v podizvajanje okrepiti, saj lahko uporaba več ravni oddajanja del v podizvajanje oteži upoštevanje kolektivnih pogodb, delovnih pogojev ter zdravstvenih in varnostnih standardov; zato meni, da bi morali biti javni organi obveščeni o vseh podrobnostih v zvezi z uporabo podizvajalcev, preden sklenejo pogodbo; poziva Komisijo, naj ob upoštevanju prihodnjega pregleda direktiv oceni, ali so potrebna dodatna pravila za dodeljevanje pogodb podizvajalcem, na primer o vzpostavitvi verige odgovornosti, zlasti za preprečitev, da bi za mala in srednja podjetja, ki so podizvajalci, veljali slabši pogoji kot za glavnega izvajalca, ki mu je oddano javno naročilo;
Considers that the current provisions on subcontracting should be strengthened, as the use of several levels of subcontracting can cause problems in terms of compliance with collective agreements, working conditions and health and safety standards; suggests therefore that the public authorities be informed of all details relating to the use of subcontractors before a contract is concluded; asks the Commission to assess, with an eye to the future review of the directives, whether further rules on the award of subcontracts are needed, for example on the establishment of a chain of responsibility, specifically to avoid SME subcontractors being subject to conditions worse than those applicable to the main contractor awarded the public contract;
priznava vlogo, ki jo lahko ima EU pri spodbujanju razvoja uspešnih javno-zasebnih partnerstev s spodbujanjem poštene konkurence in izmenjavo najboljših praks med državami članicami v zvezi s socialnimi in zaposlovalnimi politikami; vendar ugotavlja, da so velike razlike med državami članicami glede pravnih in postopkovnih zahtev, ki se uporabljajo na tem področju; v skladu s tem poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni koncept javno-zasebnega partnerstva, zlasti glede tega, kako bodo strani nosile skupno tveganje in izpolnjevale svoje finančne obveznosti;
Recognises the role the EU can play in facilitating the development of successful public-private partnerships (PPPs) by promoting fair competition and sharing best practice across Member States in relation to social and employment policies; notes, however, that major disparities exist between Member States in terms of the legal and procedural requirements applying in this area; calls, accordingly, on the Commission to clarify the concept of PPPs, in particular as regards how the parties will bear shared risks and meet their financial obligations;
poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno oceni ustrezno raven pragov za naročila blaga in storitev ter jih po potrebi dvigne, da se med drugim poenostavi dostop do javnih naročil nepridobitnim izvajalcem in socialnemu gospodarstvu ter malim in srednjim podjetjem; zahteva, da se posebna pozornost nameni pravno zavezujočim zahtevam sporazuma STO o vladnih naročilih; poudarja, da je treba glede na težave, ki že obstajajo pri pogajanjih o vprašanju dostopa do javnih naročil, upoštevati tudi, da bi dvig pragov v Evropi zlahka povzročil dodatne zaplete v trgovinski politiki EU;
Calls on the Commission to reassess the appropriate level of thresholds for supply and services contracts, and if necessary raise them, so as facilitate access to public procurement by, amongst others, not-for-profit and social-economy operators and SMEs; asks that very careful consideration be given to the legally binding requirements of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement; emphasises that, given the difficulties which already exist in negotiations on the issue of access to public procurement, it should also be borne in mind that raising thresholds in Europe could easily lead to further complications for EU trade policy;
poudarja, da bi bila vsaka razširitev pravil EU o javnih naročilih na vprašanje „kaj kupiti“ znatna sprememba sedanje ureditve in bi jo bilo treba podrobno preučiti; dvomi, da bi to prispevalo k poenostavitvi in racionalizaciji, pač pa se boji, da bi privedlo do bolj zapletenih pravil s številnimi izjemami, ki bi jih bilo težko uporabljati v praksi – glede na to, da so direktive o javnih naročilih postopkovne smernice („kako kupovati“), ki jih ne smejo nadomestiti določbe o tem, „kaj kupiti“;
Emphasises that any extension of the EU procurement rules into the area of ‘what to buy’ would represent a significant change to the current regime and should be carefully assessed; doubts that this would contribute to simplifying and streamlining, and fears rather that it would lead to more complicated rules, with many exemptions, which would be difficult to administer in practice – procurement directives being procedural (‘how to buy’) guidelines that should not be supplemented with provisions on ‘what to buy’;
Tretja naloga: poenostavitev pravil in omogočanje prilagodljivejših postopkov
Third task: simplifying the rules and allowing more flexible procedures
opozarja, da direktive pogosto veljajo za preveč podrobne in postajajo vedno bolj tehnične in zapletene, hkrati pa se je pravno tveganje neizpolnjevanja za naročnike in dobavitelje znatno povečalo; ugotavlja, da strah pred izzivom vodi do izogibanja tveganju, kar zavira inovacije in trajnostni razvoj, to pa prepogosto privede do odločitve naročnikov za najnižjo ceno namesto za najboljšo vrednost; zahteva več manevrskega prostora za pogajanja in komunikacijo v povezavi z ukrepi za zagotavljanje preglednosti ter preprečevanje zlorabe in diskriminacije in poziva, da bi bilo treba kot možen prvi korak izrecno dovoliti posvetovanje s tržnimi akterji;
Points out that the directives are often perceived as too detailed and that they have become increasingly technical and complex, while at the same time the legal risk of non-compliance has increased considerably for contracting authorities and suppliers alike; notes that the fear of challenge leads to a risk-averse approach, which stifles innovation and sustainable development, resulting far too often in contracting authorities opting for the cheapest price rather than the best value; asks for more space for negotiation and communication, combined with measures to assure transparency and to prevent abuse and discrimination, and urges that market consultation be explicitly allowed as a possible first step;
ugotavlja, da bi morala politika javnega naročanja v prvi vrsti zagotavljati učinkovito rabo sredstev v državah članicah, dosegati optimalne rezultate na področju javnih naročil z uporabo jasnih, preglednih in prožnih postopkov ter omogočati evropskim podjetjem enake konkurenčne pogoje v celotni Uniji;
Notes that public procurement policy should, in the first instance, ensure the effective use of funds by the Member States, achieve optimum results in terms of public procurement through the application of clear, transparent and flexible procedures, and allow European businesses to compete on an equal footing throughout the Union;
meni, da bi bilo treba pri reviziji evropskega prava o javnih naročilih oblikovati jasna, preprosta in prožna pravila, ki bi bila manj podrobna in bi vzpostavljala enostavnejše, manj zamudne in cenejše postopke javnih naročil, ki bi bili bolj odprti za mala in srednja podjetja ter bolj spodbujali naložbe; meni, da je treba zato večjo pozornost nameniti splošnim načelom preglednosti, enake obravnave in nediskriminacije; meni, da bi poenostavitev pravil o javnih naročilih omogočila zmanjšanje tveganja napake in prispevala k večjemu upoštevanju potreb malih naročnikov;
Advocates, when European public procurement law is being revised, clear, simple and flexible rules, reducing the level of detail and making procurement procedures simpler, less cumbersome, cheaper, more open to SMEs and more conducive to investment; sees a need, therefore, for greater reliance on the general principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination; considers that simplification of the rules on public procurement would make it possible to reduce the risk of error and to pay greater heed to the needs of small contracting authorities;
se zavzema, da bi ocenili, ali se lahko postopek s pogajanji in predhodno objavo po vsej EU dovoli v večjem obsegu kakor predvidevajo sedanje direktive, tako da bi se izboljšala komunikacija med naročniki in gospodarskimi subjekti ter zagotovilo učinkovito usklajevanje ponudbe in povpraševanja; meni, da bi bilo v primeru, da se predvidijo širitve področja uporabe postopka s pogajanji, treba uvesti dodatne zaščitne ukrepe pred zlorabo, npr. obveznost naročnika, da določi vsaj nekatere minimalne pogoje v zvezi z izvajanjem postopka za vse ponudnike že na začetku, kot je to običajno tudi v premišljenem zasebnem naročanju, in določiti zahteve za pisno dokumentacijo;
Advocates assessing whether wider use of the negotiated procedure with prior EU-wide publication might be allowed, beyond that provided for in the current directives, so that contracting authorities and economic operators can communicate better, and supply and demand can be coordinated effectively; takes the view that, if any extension of the scope of the negotiated procedure is envisaged, further safeguards against abuse should be introduced – e.g. an obligation on contracting authorities to establish, for any bidder at the outset, at least some minimum conditions regarding the performance of the procedure, in line with what is sound practice in private procurement – as well as requirements for written documentation;
poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda sedanje pristope k ugotavljanju usposobljenosti dobaviteljev (zlasti okvirne pogodbe, dinamične nabavne sisteme in uporabo sistema za ugotavljanje usposobljenosti s strani naročnikov gospodarskih javnih služb), tako da vsi novi pristopi k ugotavljanju usposobljenosti zmanjšujejo stroške in skrajšujejo roke, so privlačni za naročnike in gospodarske subjekte ter dosegajo najboljše možne rezultate;
Calls on the Commission to review the current approaches to the qualification of suppliers (particularly framework agreements, dynamic purchasing systems and the use of qualification systems by utilities procurers), so that any new approaches to qualification reduce costs and timescales, are attractive for both contracting authorities and economic operators and lead to the best possible outcomes;
vztraja pri sistematičnem sprejemanju alternativnih ponudb (ali različic), saj so ključne za spodbujanje in širjenje inovativnih rešitev; poudarja, da specifikacije, ki navajajo zahtevani učinek in funkcionalne zahteve, ter izrecno sprejemanje različic dajejo ponudnikom možnost, da predlagajo inovativne rešitve, zlasti v visoko inovativnih sektorjih, kot so IKT; poziva tudi k preučitvi vseh možnosti – tako zakonodajnih kot nezakonodajnih – za zagotovitev, da bi bila javna naročila bolj usmerjena k spodbujanju inovacij v Evropi;
Reiterates its insistence on the systematic admission of alternative bids (or variants), as they are crucial to promoting and disseminating innovative solutions; stresses that specifications referring to performance and functional requirements and the express admission of variants give tenderers the opportunity to propose innovative solutions, particularly in highly innovative sectors such as ICT; asks also that all avenues – both legislative and non-legislative – be explored to ensure that public procurement is more engaged in promoting innovation in Europe;