natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da se je proračun agencije v zadnjih štirih letih znatno povečal; ugotavlja, da se je za proračunsko leto 2009 proračun povečal za več kot trikrat v primerjavi s proračunskim letom 2006 (19 200 000 EUR);
Notes that the Agency's budget has increased substantially in the last four years; notes that, for the financial year 2009, the budget increased more than threefold over the financial year 2006 (EUR 19 200 000);
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je junija 2009 upravni odbor agencije sprejel večletni načrt za obdobje 2010–2013, čeprav to ni predvideno v njeni osnovni uredbi; poudarja pomen tega večletnega načrta, saj bo tako agencija lahko bolje načrtovala svoje dejavnosti in ocenjevala z njimi povezana tveganja; vendar poziva agencijo, naj čim prej vzpostavi povezavo med svojim delovnim programom in finančnimi napovedmi;
Welcomes that, in June 2009, the Management Board of the Agency adopted a multiannual plan for the period 2010-2013 despite the lack of provision for this in its basic regulation; stresses the importance of that multiannual plan in enabling the Agency to plan its activities and risk-assess them more effectively; nonetheless, calls on the Agency to promptly establish a link between its work programme and its financial forecasts;
ponovno poziva, naj agencija v razpredelnici, ki se priloži prihodnjemu poročilu Računskega sodišča, predstavi primerjavo med rezultati, doseženimi v letu, ki ga obravnava razrešnica, in rezultati, doseženimi v predhodnem proračunskem letu, da bi organ za razrešnico lahko bolje ocenil uspešnost agencije v vmesnem obdobju;
Calls again on the Agency to set out, in its table to be annexed to the Court of Auditors’ next report, a comparison of the operations that were carried out during the year for which discharge is to be granted and in the previous financial year, so as to enable the discharge authority to assess more effectively its performance from one year to the next;
pozdravlja pobudo agencije, ki je leta 2009 začela uporabljati sistem za obvladovanje uspešnosti Frontex, da bi bolje obveščala svoj upravni odbor z zagotavljanjem podatkov o vplivu dejavnosti agencije; ugotavlja, da je novi sistem namenjen spodbujanju poročanja, ki je bolj usmerjeno v rezultate, in bo tako dopolnilo kazalnike vložkov in kazalnike rezultatov; vendar poziva agencijo, naj zagotovi podatke o vplivu svojih dejavnosti in o tem obvesti organ za razrešnico;
Welcomes the Agency's initiative of launching, in 2009, the so-called ’Frontex Performance Management System’ to better inform the Agency's Governing Board by providing it with data on the impact of the agency operations; notes that this new system is intended to promote reporting which is more ’outcome-oriented’ and which completes input and output indicators; calls, nevertheless, on the Agency to provide information on the impact of its operations and to inform the discharge authority thereof;
ugotavlja, da bi morala razrešnica glede izvrševanja proračuna agencije temeljiti tudi na njeni uspešnosti poslovanja med letom;
Notes that the discharge for the implementation of the Agency's budget should be further based on its performance throughout the year;
poziva agencijo, naj izboljša svoje finančno upravljanje glede vračanja stroškov, ki so jih imele države članice, tako da skupaj z njimi opredeli izvore težav, da bi tako skupaj vpeljale primerne rešitve;
Calls on the Agency to improve its financial management with regard to the reimbursement of costs incurred by Member States by identifying, with those Member States, the roots of the problem so as to implement, together, the appropriate solutions;
je zaskrbljen, saj je Računsko sodišče poročalo o prenosih, ki so bili ugotovljeni že v letnih poročilih za leto 2006, 2007 in 2008; zlasti obžaluje povečano število prenosov in razveljavitev, ki se pojavljajo od leta 2006;
Is concerned that the Court of Auditors has reported carry-overs which were already reported in its 2006, 2007 and 2008 annual reports; regrets, in particular, the high level of carry-overs and cancellations since 2006;
zato poziva agencijo, naj izboljša raven porabe sredstev tako, da pripravi primerna navodila in postopke za analizo morebitnih prenosov, da se tako kar najbolj zmanjša obseg prenesenih sredstev; meni, da mora agencija izboljšati načrtovanje in spremljanje svojih dejavnosti;
Urges, therefore, the Agency to improve the level of use of appropriations by putting in place appropriate instructions and procedures for the analysis of potential carry-forwards to reduce to a minimum the volume of appropriations carried over; considers it, also, to be important for the Agency to improve the programming and the monitoring of activities;
zaskrbljen je tudi, ker je agencija razveljavila odobritve (13 900 000 EUR za leto 2009 in 13 000 000 EUR za leto 2008);
Is also concerned that the Agency had to cancel appropriations (EUR 13 900 000 for 2009 and EUR 13 000 000 for 2008);
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče poročalo o 28 proračunskih prenosih, ki so nastali zaradi tega, ker postopki za pripravo proračuna niso bili zadostno strogi; ugotavlja tudi, da do konca leta 2009 šest od 39 proračunskih vrstic iz naslova II – Upravni izdatki – ni bilo uporabljenih, in da je bilo 35 % zadevnih odobritev razveljavljenih;
Notes that the Court of Auditors reported 28 budgetary transfers due to the fact that the procedures for drawing up the budget were not sufficiently rigorous; observes, also, that, by the end of 2009, six of 39 budgetary lines of Title II -Administrative expenditure had not been used and 35 % of the corresponding appropriations were cancelled;
poudarja, da visoko število prenosov in razveljavitev kaže na to, da agencija ni mogla obvladovati tako velikega povečanja svojega proračuna; sprašuje se, ali ne bi bilo bolj odgovorno, da bi bili proračunski organ v prihodnje previdnejši pri odločanju glede povečanja proračuna agencije, ob upoštevanju časa, ki se potrebuje za izvedbo novih dejavnosti; zato poziva agencijo, naj mu posreduje podrobnejše informacije glede izvedljivosti svojih prihodnjih obveznosti;
Points out that a high level of carry-overs and cancellations is indicative of the inability of the Agency to manage such a large increase in its budget; wonders whether it would not be more responsible for the budgetary authorities to take greater care in future when deciding on increases in the Agency's budget in the light of the time needed to carry out the new activities; calls on the Agency therefore to provide it with fuller details on the feasibility of future commitments;
vendar pozdravlja pobudo agencije za nadaljnji razvoj svojega sistema za načrtovanje in spremljanje pogodbenih rokov za subvencije; ugotavlja tudi, da je od leta 2009 agencija za svoje dejavnosti izvajala postopke ocenjevanja in upravljanja tveganja;
Welcomes, nevertheless, the Agency's initiative to further develop its system for scheduling and monitoring the contractual deadline laid down in grants; notes also that since 2009 the Agency has implemented a risk assessment and risk management process for its activities;
Upravljanje subvencij
Grant Management
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče že drugo zaporedno leto poročalo, da ja agencija izvajala izplačila na podlagi enostranskih sklepov o subvenciji, ki jih je podpisala sama, čeprav veljavna pravila ne predvidevajo takšne vrste instrumentov; ugotavlja, da je bil znesek, izplačan leta 2009, več kot 28 000 000 EUR, za leto 2008 pa 17 000 000 EUR; vendar pozdravlja pobudo agencije, da, v odgovor na ugotovitve Računskega sodišča, podpiše okvirni sporazum o partnerstvu z obmejnimi organi držav članic;
Observes that the Court of Auditors reported, for the second year running, that the Agency paid out amounts on the basis of unilateral grant decisions signed by the Agency, while the rules in force make no provision for this type of instrument; notes that the amount paid out in 2009 was more than EUR 28 000 000 and in 2008 was EUR 17 000 000; welcomes, nevertheless, the Agency's initiative, made in response to the Court's observation, of signing a framework Partnership Agreement with Member States border authorities;
poziva agencijo, naj izboljša upravljanje svojih subvencij:
Calls on the Agency to improve its grant management by:
z izvajanjem kontrol o upravičencih subvencij na mestu samem;
carrying out on-the-spot controls on the grant beneficiaries,
s spodbujanjem standardnih stroškov na enoto na kategorijo, namesto subvencij na osnovi vračanja upravičenih stroškov;
promoting standard unit costs per category instead of grants based on reimbursements of eligible costs;
z jasnim opisom, sporočanjem in spremljanjem odgovornosti akterjev;
clearly describing, communicating and monitoring the actors’ responsibilities
z nudenjem operacijskega načrta, ki ga bodo odobrili vsi akterji;
providing an operational plan agreed by all actors;
zaskrbljeno ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v osmih revidiranih primerih poročalo o 27 % precenitvi stroškov za vnaprejšnje financiranje mejnih organov; ugotavlja tudi, da je bilo za dejavnosti, ki so bile zaključene leta 2009, treba izdati več kot 40 nalogov za izterjavo, da bi se izterjali previsoko izplačani zneski predplačil;
Notes with concern that the Court of Auditors reported the overstatement by 27 % of the costs for pre-financing to border authorities in the 8 cases audited; notes also that, for the activities which ended in 2009, more than 40 recovery orders had to be issued to recover advances made in excess;
pozdravlja pobudo agencije glede sprejemanja ukrepov za povečanje objektivnosti in preglednosti postopkov zaposlovanja v skladu s priporočili Parlamenta; pravzaprav ugotavlja, da je agencija sprejela izvedbena pravila in notranje smernice za člane izbirnih komisij; zlasti čestita agenciji, da je novembra 2010 sprejela politiko zaposlovanja, ki vključuje naslednje dejanske ukrepe: spoštovanje rokov pri imenovanju članov izbirne komisije, predhodna priprava vprašanj za razgovore in vsebino pisnih preizkusov znanja, anonimno ocenjevanje pisnih preizkusov znanja; priprava vzorčnih odgovorov za vprašanja za razgovor in za pisne preizkuse, priprava zapisnikov za vsako zaposlitev, razvoj orodja za elektronsko zaposlovanje, ki bo vzpostavljeno v letu 2011, da bi olajšalo postopke zaposlovanja in izbora;
Welcomes the Agency's initiative of taking measures to increase the objectivity and transparency of the recruitment processes, in accordance with the Parliament's recommendations; notes, in fact, that the Agency adopted implementing rules and internal guidelines for the members of the selection committees; congratulates, in particular, the Agency for adopting a Recruitment Policy in November 2010 which includes the following concrete actions: compliance with deadlines when nominating the selection board members, prior preparation of interview questions and the content of written tests, anonymous assessment of written tests; preparation of model answers for interview questions and written tests, preparation of minutes in respect of any recruitment, development of an e-recruitment tool to be implemented in the course of 2011 to facilitate the recruitment and selection process;
opaža, da je služba za notranjo revizijo leta 2009 izvedla revizijo upravljanja subvencij, da bi tako ocenila: letno načrtovanje subvencij, uporabljen pravni instrument, izvajanje subvencij ter spremljanje in poročanje;
Acknowledges that the Internal Audit Service (IAS) carried out, in 2009, an audit on Grant Management with the objective of assessing the following: the annual planning of grants, the legal instrument used, the implementation of grants and the monitoring and reporting;
opaža, da je bilo od 19 priporočil službe za notranjo revizijo glede spremljanja prejšnjih priporočil primerno in učinkovito izvedenih samo šest, deset priporočil se še izvaja, tri pa so dokončana, vendar jih mora služba za notranjo revizijo še preveriti; vseeno poziva direktorja agencije, naj organ za razrešnico obvesti o vsebini priporočil, ki jih je služba za notranjo revizijo ocenila kot ’zelo pomembna’, ter o ukrepih, ki so bili glede tega sprejeti;
Acknowledges that, out of the 19 recommendations issued by the IAS on the follow-up of early recommendations, 6 have been adequately and effectively implemented, 10 are in progress and 3 are completed but still need to be verified by the IAS; calls, nevertheless, on the Director of the Agency to inform the discharge authority as to the content of the recommendations that are considered to be ’very important’ by the IAS and on the actions taken in that respect;
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS za proračunsko leto 2009 ( C7-0243/2010 – 2010/2183(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 10 May 2011 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority for the financial year 2009 ( C7-0243/2010 – 2010/2183(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS za proračunsko leto 2009,
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority for the financial year 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS za proračunsko leto 2009, skupaj z odgovori organa UL C 338, 14.12.2010, str.
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority for the financial year 2009, together with the Authority's replies OJ C 338, 14.12.2010, p.
, zlasti člena 12 Uredbe,
, and in particular Article 12 thereof,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0103/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0103/2011 ),
podeli razrešnico izvršnemu direktorju Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS glede izvrševanja proračuna organa za proračunsko leto 2009;
Grants the Executive Director of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2009;
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 o zaključku poslovnih knjig Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS za proračunsko leto 2009 ( C7-0243/2010 – 2010/2183(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 10 May 2011 on the closure of the accounts of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority for the financial year 2009 ( C7-0243/2010 – 2010/2183(DEC) )
odobri zaključek poslovnih knjig Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS za proračunsko leto 2009;
Approves the closure of the accounts of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority for the financial year 2009;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS za proračunsko leto 2009 ( C7-0243/2010 – 2010/2183(DEC) )
European Parliament resolution of 10 May 2011 with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the European GNSS Supervisory Authority for the financial year 2009 ( C7-0243/2010 – 2010/2183(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS za proračunsko leto 2009, skupaj z odgovori organa UL C 338, 14.12.2010, str.
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the final annual accounts of the European GNSS Supervisory Authority for the financial year 2009, together with the Authority's replies OJ C 338, 14.12.2010, p.
ker je Nadzorni organ za evropski GNSS postal finančno neodvisen leta 2006,
whereas the European GNSS Supervisory Authority became financially autonomous in 2006,
ker je Računsko sodišče izjavilo, da ni moglo oblikovati mnenja o računovodskih izkazih Nadzornega organa za evropski GNSS za proračunsko leto 2007, ter opozorilo, da je v letu 2007 potekal pregled celotne strukture projekta Galileo in da so bili računovodski izkazi nadzornega organa pripravljeni v nejasnih pravnih okoliščinah,
whereas the Court of Auditors stated that it was unable to form an opinion on the accounts of the Authority for the financial year 2007 and points out that the entire architecture of the Galileo project was being revised in 2007 and that the Authority's accounts were prepared in a fragile legal environment,
ker je Parlament 5. maja 2010 izvršnemu direktorju nadzornega organa podelil razrešnico glede izvrševanja proračuna za proračunsko leto 2008 UL L 252, 25.9.2010, str.
whereas on 5 May 2010 Parliament granted the Executive Director of the Authority discharge for implementation of the Authority's budget for the financial year 2008 OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p.
navedel, da obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče izdalo mnenje s pridržkom glede zanesljivosti letnih računovodskih izkazov za proračunsko leto 2008 in glede zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij;
regretted that the Court of Auditors nuanced its statement of assurance on the reliability of the annual accounts for the financial year 2008 and on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions;
izrazil zaskrbljenost, ker kljub Uredbi (ES) št. 683/2008 Uredba (ES) št. 683/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. julija 2008 o nadaljevanju izvajanja evropskih satelitskih navigacijskih programov (EGNOS in Galileo) (UL L 196, 24.7.2008, str.
was concerned that, although under Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 on the further implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo) (OJ L 196, 24.7.2008, p.
, ki določa, da je od 1. januarja 2009 Komisija pristojna za upravljanje sredstev in izvajanje evropskih programov za satelitsko navigacijo (Galileo in EGNOS), do konca leta 2008 še ni bila na Komisijo prenesena nobena dejavnost ali premoženje, prav tako v letnih računovodskih izkazih obeh institucij ni prikazana nova razdelitev pristojnosti med Komisijo in nadzornim organom;
the Commission became responsible, from 1 January 2009, for fund management and implementation of the European satellite navigation programmes (EGNOS and Galileo), neither activities nor any assets had been transferred to the Commission by the end of 2008, and that the new distribution of responsibilities between the Commission and the Authority was not clearly reflected in their respective annual accounts,
ker je proračun nadzornega organa za leto 2009 znašal 44 400 000 EUR, kar je za 64 % manj kot v proračunskem letu 2008,
whereas the budget of the Authority for the year 2009 was EUR 44 400 000, which is a decrease of 64% from the financial year 2008,
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je, po začetku veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 683/2008, večina dejavnosti in premoženja, povezanih s programi EGNOS in Galileo, bila decembra 2009 prenesena na Komisijo; ugotavlja, da je bil preostali del dejavnosti in premoženja prenesen leta 2010;
Welcomes the fact that, following the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 683/2008 , most of the activities and assets related to the EGNOS and Galileo programmes were transferred to the Commission in December 2009; notes that the remaining part of the activities and assets had to be transferred in 2010;
je seznanjen z izjavo Računskega sodišča, da za postopek dodeljevanja subvencij (17 500 000 EUR) pri prvem razpisu za zbiranje predlogov za Galileo za sedmi okvirni program (Framework Programme 7/Galileo/Call 1) merila za izključitev niso bila objavljena in preverjena in v zvezi z merili o izpolnjevanju pogojev organ ni sistematično dokazal, da je preveril, da potencialni upravičenci, ki sodelujejo pri enem od področij, ustrezajo merilom za mala in srednje velika podjetja;
Acknowledges the statement from the Court of Auditors that for the ’Framework Programme 7/Galileo/Call 1’ grants procedure (EUR 17 500 000) the exclusion criteria were not published and checked and, as regards the eligibility criteria, the Authority did not systematically evidence that it had verified that the small and medium enterprises criteria for the potential beneficiaries participating in one of the topics were met;
ugotavlja tudi, da je organ je 31. marca 2010 objavil končni proračun, ki ni odražal končnega proračuna za proračunsko leto 2009, ki ga je odobril upravni svet, in ni vseboval prihodkov nadzornega organa; zato odločno poziva nadzorni organ, naj izboljša stanje in o spremembi obvesti organ za razrešnico;
Notes also that the final budget published by the Authority on 31 March 2010 did not reflect the final budget for 2009 approved by the Administrative Board and did not include its revenue; urges the Authority therefore to remedy the situation and inform the discharge authority of the change;
obžaluje pomanjkljivosti pri postopkih izbire osebja, zaradi česar je ogrožena preglednost teh postopkov; pravzaprav ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče poročalo, da pri štirih revidiranih postopkih za izbiranje osebja ni dokazov, da so bili pred začetkom procesa ocenjevanja določeni vrednotenje izbirnih meril in pragovi, ki bi jih morali kandidati doseči, da bi bili povabljeni na pisni preizkus znanja in na razgovor, in ni dokazov o tem, da bi bila vprašanja za pisne preizkuse znanja in razgovore določena pred pripravo ožjega seznama kandidatov; zato poziva nadzorni organ, naj izboljša razmere s tem, da izboljša svoje izbirne postopke;
Regrets the deficiencies in staff selection procedures which put at risk the transparency of these procedures; acknowledges, in fact, that the Court of Auditors reported that with regard to the four staff selection procedures audited, no evidence existed that the weightings of the selection criteria and the thresholds that candidates had to meet in order to be invited to the written tests and interviews were established before the evaluation process began and no evidence existed that the questions for the written tests and interviews were defined prior to drawing up the shortlist of candidates; calls therefore on the Authority to remedy the situation by improving its selection procedures;
poudarja, da je treba popraviti pomanjkljivosti, ki kršijo načelo enake obravnave pri uporabi merila o izpolnjevanju pogojev v postopkih zaposlovanja, ki so odprti tako za notranje kot za zunanje kandidate; pravzaprav ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče pri enem od revidiranih postopkov za zaposlovanje ugotovilo, da je en kandidat štel za primernega, čeprav je bilo že na začetku postopka jasno ugotovljeno, da ne izpolnjuje merila, ampak je bil notranji kandidat;
Stresses also the need to remedy deficiencies which infringe the principle of equal treatment in the application of the eligibility criteria in recruitment procedures open to both internal and external candidates; acknowledges, in fact, from the Court of Auditors that in one recruitment procedure audited, one candidate was considered eligible even though it had been clearly established from the beginning of the procedure that he did not meet the selection criteria but was an internal candidate;
priznava, da je služba za notranjo revizijo opravila notranjo revizijo novembra 2007, nato pa še naknadni reviziji oktobra 2008 in decembra 2009; ugotavlja, da se dve pomembni priporočili omenjene službe, ki ju je treba še izvesti, nanašata na občutljiva delovna mesta in opise delovnih mest;
Acknowledges that the Internal Audit Service (IAS) conducted its internal audit in November 2007 and its follow-up audits in October 2008 and December 2009; notes that the two remaining important IAS recommendations yet to be implemented relate to sensitive posts and job descriptions;
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Skupnega podjetja ARTEMIS za proračunsko leto 2009 ( C7-0250/2010 - 2010/2190(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 10 May 2011 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2009 ( C7-0250/2010 – 2010/2190(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Skupnega podjetja ARTEMIS za proračunsko leto 2009,
having regard to the final annual accounts of the ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking for the financial year 2009,