natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so stroški krize za družbo zelo visoki, saj se je zaposlenost v EU zmanjšala za 1,8 %, kar pomeni, da je službo izgubilo 23 milijonov za delo sposobnih ljudi (9,6 % vseh), stopnja brezposelnosti mladih znaša 21 %, obeti za ponovno povečanje zaposlenosti so slabi, 17 % državljanom EU pa grozi revščina Eurostat, Statistics in focus, 9/2010, prebivalstvo in socialni pogoji http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-10-009/EN/KS-SF-10-009-EN.PDF in Evropska komisija, Zaposlovanje v Evropi v letu 2010 (http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/eie/executive_summarys_en.html#top).
whereas the social costs of the crisis are high, with employment falling in the EU by 1.8%, resulting in unemployment for 23 million economically active people (9.6% of the total), a youth unemployment rate of 21 %, uncertain prospects of an upturn in employment levels and 17% of EU citizens at risk of falling into poverty Eurostat, Statistics in focus, 9/2010, Population and social conditions http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-10-009/EN/KS-SF-10-009-EN.PDF and European Commission, Employment in Europe 2010 (http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/eie/executive_summarys_en.html#top).
ker je bilo tri leta po propadu družbe Lehman Brothers sprejetih nekaj ukrepov za obvladovanje finančne krize; ker je potrebno dodatno delo za vzpostavitev trajnostnega finančnega sektorja, ki bo zmožen kljubovati izjemno špekulativnemu vedenju ter financirati realno gospodarstvo, po možnosti s financiranjem dolgoročnih naložb in ustvarjanjem delovnih mest; ker reforme gospodarskega upravljanja niso v zadostni meri obravnavale vprašanja neravnovesij na svetovni ravni in ravni EU,
whereas three years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, some steps have been taken to counter the financial crisis; whereas, however, further work is needed to establish a sustainable financial sector able to cope with excessive speculative behaviour and to finance the real economy, preferably through funding long-term investment needs and the creation of jobs; whereas the economic governance reforms have not sufficiently addressed the issue of imbalances at global and EU level,
ker je finančna kriza sprožila gospodarsko in socialno krizo, to pa je v nekaterih državah privedlo do politične krize,
whereas the financial crisis has triggered an economic and social crisis leading in some countries to a political crisis,
ker naj bi po napovedih Evropske komisije obseg proizvodnje do leta 2013 upadel za 4,8 % BDP, v naslednjem desetletju pa naj bi bila rast občutno nižja kakor v zadnjih 20 letih Evropska komisija, Vpliv sedanje gospodarske in finančne krize na morebitno rast proizvodnje, priložnostni dokument 49, junij 2009, tabela V, stran 33 (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication15479_en.pdf).
whereas output is forecast by the European Commission to fall by about 4.8% of GDP by 2013 and, over the next decade, to be significantly lower than over the last 20 years European Commission, Impact of the current Economic and Financial crisis on potential output, Occasional Papers 49, June 2009, Table V, Page 33 (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication15479_en.pdf).
ker je kriza razkrila pomanjkanje zaupanja, odločnosti in vizije v EU,
whereas the crisis reveals a lack of trust, confidence and vision within the EU,
ker je dodatna krepitev socialnega tržnega gospodarstva in njegovih vrednot eden glavnih ciljev Evropske unije,
whereas further building on the social market economy and its values is an essential goal of the European Union,
ker se je število ljudi, ki živijo v sorazmerni blaginji, povečalo, hkrati pa sta se gospodarska in socialna vrzel razširili,
whereas the number of people living in relative prosperity has increased, but economic and social gaps have at the same time widened,
ker je svetovna finančna kriza bistveno vplivala na napredek pri doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, predvsem cilja, da bi do leta 2015 za polovico zmanjšali svetovno revščino,
whereas the global financial crisis has had a severe impact on progress towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and, in particular, the goal of halving global poverty by 2015,
ker je kriza pokazala, da je treba razviti pristno gospodarsko upravljanje Unije, ki bi bilo sestavljeno iz sistematičnega niza politik, namenjenih zagotavljanju trajnostne rasti, kakovostnih in stabilnih delovnih mest, proračunske discipline, odpravi prekomernih makroekonomskih neravnovesij, zagotavljanju konkurenčnosti in produktivnosti gospodarstva EU ter strožji regulaciji in nadzoru finančnih trgov, ter iz ustreznega mehanizma za reševanje finančne krize,
whereas the crisis has made clear the need for progress towards establishing a genuine economic governance of the Union, consisting of a systematic set of policies designed to ensure sustainable growth, good stable jobs, budgetary discipline, the correction of excessive macro-economic imbalances, competitiveness and productivity in the EU's economy, and stricter regulation and supervision of financial markets, as well as a suitable mechanism for resolving the financial crisis,
ker je Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 8. junija 2011 o vlaganju v prihodnost: novi večletni finančni okvir za konkurenčno, trajnostno in vključujočo Evropo jasno izjavil, da proračun EU ne glede na možne prihranke s sedanjo stopnjo 1 % BND ne more premostiti finančne vrzeli zaradi dodatnih finančnih potreb, ki izhajajo iz pogodbe in iz sedanjih političnih prednostnih nalog in obveznosti; zato je Evropski parlament prepričan, da je treba vire za prihodnji večletni finančni okvir povečati za najmanj 5 % v primerjavi z ravnjo za leto 2013,
whereas the European Parliament, in its resolution of 8 June 2011 on ‘Investing in the future: a new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for a competitive, sustainable and inclusive Europe’, clearly stated that regardless of realisable savings, the EU budget, at its current overall level of 1 % of GNI, is not capable of closing the financing gap deriving from additional financing needs arising from the Treaty and from existing policy priorities and commitments; whereas the European Parliament is therefore convinced that an increase of at least 5 % in resources is needed for the next MFF as compared to the 2013 level,
ker v isti resoluciji Evropski parlament ugotavlja, da zgornja meja za lastna sredstva ostaja nespremenjena že od leta 1993; meni, da zgornja meja za lastna sredstva lahko zahteva nekatere postopne prilagoditve, saj države članice zaupajo več pristojnosti Uniji in zanjo določajo več ciljev; meni, da medtem, ko trenutna zgornja meja za lastna sredstva, ki je bila v Svetu soglasno določena, zagotavlja zadosten proračunski manevrski prostor za soočanje z najnujnejšimi izzivi Unije, to še vedno ne bo zadosti za to, da bi proračun EU postal pravo orodje za evropsko gospodarsko upravljanje ali za pomemben prispevek k vlaganju v strategijo EU 2020 na ravni EU;
whereas in the same resolution, the European Parliament notes that the own resources ceiling has been unchanged since 1993; believes that the own resources ceiling might require some progressive adjustment as Member States confer more competences on, and fix more objectives for the Union; considers that while the current ceiling of own resources set unanimously by the Council provides sufficient budgetary leeway to meet the most pressing Union challenges but that it would still be insufficient for the EU Budget to become a real tool for European economic governance or to contribute in a major way to investing in the Europe 2020 strategy at EU level,
ker bi bilo treba za zagotovitev trajnostne rasti v Uniji in uresničitev ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 prerazporediti neporabljene odobritve plačil za skupne programe, namenjene rasti, konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanju, zagotoviti učinek vzvoda s posojili EIB in vzpostaviti trg obveznic, ki bi privabljal javne in zasebne vlagatelje ter omogočal financiranje skupnih projektov v interesu Unije kot celote (obveznice za posamezne projekte),
whereas in order for sustainable growth to be guaranteed in the Union and for the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy to be achieved, it is necessary to redeploy unused payment appropriations to joint programmes targeting growth, competitiveness and employment, and to leverage EIB loans and set up a project bond market that attracts public and private investors and can be used to fund joint projects of interest to the Union as a whole (bonds for specific projects),
Evropski državni dolg in kriza evra, vključno z vzajemnim javnim zadolževanjem in izdajanjem evroobveznic
European sovereign debt and the euro crisis, including the mutual issuance of public debt and Eurobonds
znova opozarja na trikotnik medsebojno povezanih šibkih elementov, ko je neuravnovešena javnofinančna politika nekaterih držav članic povečala predkrizne javne primanjkljaje, finančna kriza pa je precej prispevala k dodatnemu napihovanju teh primanjkljajev, čemur so sledile napetosti na trgu državnih dolgov v nekaterih državah članicah;
Recalls the triangle of inter-linked vulnerabilities, whereby the unbalanced fiscal policy of some Member States has amplified the pre-crisis public deficits and the financial crisis has contributed significantly to a further ballooning of those deficits, followed by tensions in sovereign debt markets in some Member States;
poudarja, da so bonitetne agencije s tem, ko so znižale oceno javnega dolga Grčije, Irske in Portugalske, povzročile razširitev v vse države evroobmočja ter preobrat v portfeljih vlagateljev, ki sta ga zaznamovala nenaklonjenost špekulacijam ter strah pred tveganjem, zaradi česar Grčija, Irska in Portugalska na trgu nista več dobili posojil po vzdržnih cenah, zato sta potrebovali finančno pomoč iz programov EU in Mednarodnega denarnega sklada;
Stresses that, following the downgrading of the sovereign debt of Greece, Ireland and Portugal by credit rating agencies, there has been a spill-over effect across the eurozone countries and a shift in portfolios reflecting speculative and risk-averse behaviour by investors and that, as a consequence of this, market funding at sustainable rates has become inaccessible to Greece, Ireland and Portugal, resulting in the provision of financial assistance under EU-IMF programmes;
meni, da mora Mednarodna organizacija dela sodelovati pri programih finančne pomoči EU in Mednarodnega denarnega sklada;
Considers that the International Labour Organization (ILO) should be involved in the EU-IMF financial assistance programmes;
opozarja, da so imele bonitetne agencije pomembno vlogo pri nastanku finančne krize, in sicer z napačnimi ocenami strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov, ki jih je bilo treba znižati; se strinja z načeli, ki jih je oktobra 2010 opredelil Odbor za finančno stabilnost in ki dajejo splošne smernice za zmanjšanje zanašanja na zunanje bonitetne ocene, ter poziva Komisijo, naj ustrezno upošteva javno posvetovanje, ki se je končalo januarja 2011;
Recalls that credit rating agencies played a significant role in the build-up to the financial crisis through the assignment of faulty ratings to structured finance instruments which had to be downgraded; agrees with the principles set out by the Financial Stability Board in October 2010 giving general guidance on how to reduce reliance on external credit ratings, and calls on the Commission to take into due consideration the public consultation that ended in January 2011;
poziva k izvedbi pregledne revizije javnega dolga, da bi tako opredelili njegov izvor in ugotovili identiteto glavnih imetnikov dolžniških vrednostnih papirjev in obseg dolga;
Calls for a transparent audit of public debt to be carried out in order to determine its origin and to ascertain the identity of the main holders of debt securities and the amounts involved;
ugotavlja, da dvostranski in večstranski pristopi držav članic ogrožajo gospodarsko povezovanje, finančno stabilnost in verodostojnost evra, in pozdravlja načelo evropskega semestra za usklajevanje ekonomskih politik, katerega cilj je obvladati čezmerna notranja neravnovesja v EU;
Notes that bilateral or multilateral approaches by Member States pose a threat to economic integration, financial stability and the credibility of the euro, and welcomes the principle of the European semester of economic policy coordination, the aim of which is to overcome excessive internal imbalances within the EU;
poudarja, da je kriza državnega dolga razkrila tveganje neravnovesij znotraj Evrope; poudarja, da se mora EU odzvati enotno, da mora razviti veliko tesnejše usklajevanje javnofinančne politike in, kjer je to ustrezno, razviti skupno politiko z zadostnim proračunom EU, ki se delno financira iz lastnih sredstev, prav tako pa mora uvesti ustrezne ukrepe za krizno upravljanje ter gospodarsko zbliževanje;
Underlines the fact that the sovereign debt crisis has revealed the risks posed by intra-European imbalances; stresses the need for the EU to react as one, to develop a much closer coordination of fiscal policies and, where appropriate, a common one with a sufficient EU budget funded partly through own resources, and to put in place adequate provisions for crisis management and economic convergence;
poudarja potrebo po racionalizaciji odhodkov držav članic prek proračuna EU, zlasti na področjih, na katerih ima EU večjo dodano vrednost kot nacionalni proračuni;
Highlights the need to rationalise Member States' expenditures through the EU budget, notably in areas where the EU has more added value than national budgets;
poudarja, da je treba obete za rast držav članic upoštevati kot bistveni element pri opredelitvi relativne stopnje obrestnih mer, ki veljajo za ta državni dolg, zlasti glede na pomoč, ki jo zagotavlja evropski instrument za finančno stabilnost oz. od leta 2013 evropski mehanizem za stabilnost;
Underlines that Member States' growth perspectives should be seen as a crucial element for the definition of the relative level of interest rates attached to that sovereign debt, in particular with respect to the assistance provided by the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and, from 2013, by the European Stability Mechanism (ESM);
je seznanjen s prizadevanji močno zadolženih držav članic za proračunsko konsolidacijo in strukturne reforme;
Recognises the efforts which the highly indebted Member States are making to bring about budget consolidation and structural reforms;
poudarja, da tudi matične banke s sedežem v državah članicah nosijo svoj del odgovornosti za neodgovorne posojilne prakse hčerinskih bank v drugih državah članicah EU, ki so med drugim prispevale k nastanku nepremičninskih balonov v Španiji, na Irskem in v Latviji ter k posledičnim proračunskim težavam, s katerimi se zdaj srečujejo te države članice; zato ugotavlja, da morebitno zagotavljanje finančne pomoči tem zadolženim državam članicam ne bi služilo le njihovemu posebnemu interesu, ampak tudi interesu tistih držav članic, katerih matične banke že v izhodišču niso razvile odgovornih posojilnih praks v hčerinskih bankah;
Stresses that parent banks originating in Member States also bear their share of responsibility for the irresponsible lending practices engaged in by their subsidiary banks in other EU Member States, which contributed inter alia to the real-estate bubbles in Spain, Ireland and Latvia, and the resulting budgetary difficulties which are currently being experienced by those Member States; notes, therefore, that the provision of financial assistance to those indebted Member States, were it to become necessary, would serve not only their particular interests but also the interests of those Member States in which the parent banks failed to develop responsible lending practices in their subsidiary banks in the first place;
poudarja, da imajo vse države članice sistemski pomen; poziva k celovitemu, socialno vključujočemu in povezovalnemu reformnemu svežnju, ki se bo posvetil pomanjkljivostim finančnega sistema; poziva k razvoju zasnove evropske zakladnice, da bi okrepili gospodarski steber ekonomske in monetarne unije; prav tako poziva k ukrepom za povečanje konkurenčnosti, ki je trenutno nezadostna, z ustreznimi strukturnimi reformami, ki upoštevajo cilje strategije Evropa 2020 in temeljne vzroke za krizo javnega dolga, kjer je to potrebno; poudarja, da morajo države članice znova zagotoviti vzdržne javne finance, ki temeljijo na zanesljivih politikah za kakovostne javne odhodke ter pravično in učinkovito pobiranje prihodkov;
Underlines that all Member States have systemic importance; calls for a comprehensive, socially inclusive and cohesive reform package addressing the weaknesses of the financial system; calls for the development of the concept of a European Treasury to strengthen the economic pillar of EMU; calls, moreover, for measures to overcome the current lack of competitiveness through appropriate structural reforms, addressing the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy and the fundamental causes underlying the public debt crisis wherever necessary; points out that the Member States need to return to sustainable public finances and growth rates, based on sound policies for quality public expenditure and fair and efficient revenue collection;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči prihodnji sistem evroobveznic, da bi tako določila pogoje, pod katerimi bi tak sistem koristil vsem udeleženim državam članicam in celotnemu evroobmočju; poudarja, da bi lahko evroobveznice ustrezno nadomestile trg obveznic, vezan na ameriški dolar, spodbudile povezovanje evropskega trga državnega dolga, znižale stroške zadolževanja, povečale likvidnost, proračunsko disciplino in skladnost s paktom za stabilnost in rast, spodbujale usklajene strukturne reforme ter povečale stabilnost kapitalskih trgov, to pa bi razširilo prepričanje, da je evro varna naložba za ves svet; znova opozarja, da zahteva vzajemno izdajanje evroobveznic nadaljnji korak k skupni gospodarski in javnofinančni politiki;
Calls on the Commission to carry out an investigation into a future system of Eurobonds, with a view to determining the conditions under which such a system would be beneficial to all participating Member States and to the eurozone as a whole; points out that Eurobonds would offer a viable alternative to the US dollar bond market, and that they could foster integration of the European sovereign debt market, lower borrowing costs, increase liquidity, budgetary discipline and compliance with the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP), promote coordinated structural reforms, and make capital markets more stable, which will foster the idea of the euro as a global ‘safe haven’; recalls that the common issuance of Eurobonds requires a further move towards a common economic and fiscal policy;
zato poudarja, da bi bilo treba izdajanje evroobveznic, če bodo izdane, omejiti na državni dolg, ki bi znašal največ 60 % BDP in bi se odplačeval prednostno ter za katerega bi veljala skupna in solidarna odgovornost, povezati pa bi ga bilo treba še s spodbudami za zmanjšanje zadolženosti držav na to raven; opominja, da bi moral biti glavni cilj evroobveznic zmanjšanje državne zadolženosti, izogibanje moralnemu tveganju in preprečevanje špekulacij v zvezi z evrom; ugotavlja, da bi dostop do evroobveznic zahteval dogovor o opaznih programih zmanjševanja dolga in njihovo izvajanje;
Stresses, therefore, that when Eurobonds are to be issued, their issuance should be limited to a debt ratio of 60% of GDP under joint and several liability as senior sovereign debt, and should be linked to incentives to reduce sovereign debt to that level; suggests that the overarching aim of Eurobonds should be to reduce sovereign debt and to avoid moral hazard and prevent speculation against the euro; notes that access to such Eurobonds would require agreement on, and implementation of, measurable programmes of debt reduction;
ugotavlja, da je bil dosežen politični dogovor o reviziji člena 125 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, da bi začasni evropski instrument za finančno stabilnost do leta 2013 preoblikovali v stalni evropski mehanizem za stabilnost; poziva k poznejšemu preoblikovanju evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost v evropsko agencijo za upravljanje dolga in k močnejši vlogi Parlamenta pri tem spreminjanju Pogodbe;
Notes that there is political agreement on revising Article 125 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) in order to transform the temporary EFSF system into a permanent ESM by 2013; calls for the ESM to be converted into a European Debt Agency at a later stage and for Parliament to be given a consistent role in this modification of the Treaty;
obžaluje pomanjkanje družbene odgovornosti strokovnjakov v finančnem sektorju, ki se niso pripravljeni odreči delu svojih dodatkov in jih vsaj za obdobje enega leta nameniti socialnim projektom, kot je odprava brezposelnosti mladih v Uniji;
Regrets the lack of social responsibility demonstrated by financial sector professionals by not forfeiting part of their bonuses for at least one year and instead donating them to a social project, such as the alleviation of youth unemployment in the Union;
znova opominja, da tako nekatera razvita kot tudi nekatera rastoča gospodarstva, kot sta ZDA in Kitajska prispevajo, k svetovnim neravnovesjem pozdravlja dejavno sodelovanje in nadaljnjo vključitev Kitajske v svetovni sistem gospodarskega upravljanja;
Recalls that both some developed and emerging economies, such as the US and China, contribute to global imbalances; welcomes active participation and further integration of China into the global economic governance system;
ugotavlja, da je več kot polovica svetovnega gospodarstva zunaj EU, ZDA in Japonske, kar pomeni, da se je pred kratkim zgodil preobrat stanja, kot ga doslej še ni bilo;
Notes that over half of the global economy is located outside the EU, the USA and Japan, this being a recent and unprecedented reversal of the situation previously prevailing;
poudarja, da morajo finančni trgi služiti trajnostnemu razvoju realnega gospodarstva;
Stresses that the financial markets must serve sustainable development of the real economy;
podpira skupino G20 v prizadevanjih za regulacijo trgov blagovnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov; poziva Komisijo, naj poišče rešitev za nestanovitnost cen na kmetijskih trgih, naj v celoti uvede vse okvirne ukrepe, o katerih so se dogovorili na ravni G20, in naj se bori proti pretiranim in škodljivim špekulacijam, zlasti s prihodnjo zakonodajo o finančnih trgih v EU in revizijo direktive o tržni manipulaciji Direktiva 2003/6/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2003 o trgovanju z notranjimi informacijami in tržni manipulaciji (zloraba trga) (UL L 96, 12.4.2003, str.
Supports the G20 in its efforts to regulate commodity derivatives markets; calls on the Commission to address price volatility in agricultural markets, to fully implement all framework measures agreed on at G20 level and to combat excessive and harmful speculation, notably through the upcoming financial market legislation to be introduced in the EU, and the revision of the Market Abuse Directive Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) (OJ L 96, 12.4.2003, p.
in direktivo o trgih finančnih instrumentov Direktiva 2004/39/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o trgih finančnih instrumentov (UL L 145, 30.4.2004, str.
and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments (OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p.