natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da sta učinkovita izbira in izvajanje projektov na nekaterih področjih ovirana, ker niso izpolnjeni ustrezni predpogoji, na primer enostavnejši prijavni postopki na nacionalni ravni, jasne nacionalne prednostne naloge na nekaterih področjih delovanja, pravočasni prenos zakonov EU in utrjena institucionalna in upravna zmogljivost, ter zaradi prekomerne birokracije na državni ravni; zato poziva države članice in regije, naj olajšajo izvajanje politike z obvladovanjem teh izzivov in zlasti z izboljšanjem pravnega okvira na področju državne pomoči, javnega naročanja in okoljskih pravil ter naj nadaljujejo z institucionalnimi reformami;
Underlines the fact that effective selection and implementation of projects in some areas is hampered by missing relevant preconditions such as simpler application procedures at national level, clear national priorities for certain areas of intervention, timely transposition of EU laws and consolidated institutional and administrative capacity, and by excessive national red tape; calls therefore on Member States and regions to facilitate policy implementation by tackling these challenges and in particular by adapting the legal framework in the field of state aid, public procurement and environmental rules and pursue institutional reforms;
z obžalovanjem opozarja na veliko zamudo pri izvajanju politike, ki je predvsem posledica naslednjih dejavnikov: poznega zaključka pogajanj o večletnem finančnem okviru in zakonodajnem svežnju za kohezijsko politiko, ki je povzročil zamude pri dokončanju nacionalnih strategij in operativnih programov, sprememb predpisov o finančnem nadzoru in ocenjevalnih meril na nacionalni ravni, prekrivanja z zaključkom obdobja 2000–2006 in premajhnih javnih sredstev za sofinanciranje v državah članicah;
Recalls with regret that the substantial delay in policy implementation results mainly from the following factors: late conclusion of the negotiations on the multiannual financial framework and the legislative package of the policy, resulting in belated completion of the national strategies and operational programmes, changes in the rules on financial control and evaluation criteria imposed at national level, overlap with the closure of the period 2000-2006 and scarce public resources available for cofinancing in Member States;
obžaluje, da strateško poročilo, kljub dejstvu, da bi moralo poudariti prispevek programov, sofinanciranih iz strukturnih skladov, pri uresničevanju ciljev kohezijske politike, ne daje celovitih podatkov o regionalnih razlikah do leta 2009;
Deplores the fact that, although the Strategic Report should highlight the contribution of the programmes cofinanced by the Structural Funds towards implementing the objectives of cohesion policy, it does not provide comprehensive data on the situation regarding regional disparities up to 2009;
Odziv na gospodarsko krizo
Response to the economic crisis
pozdravlja objavo delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z naslovom Kohezijska politika: odzivanje na gospodarsko krizo, ki je pregled izvajanja ukrepov kohezijske politike, sprejetih za podporo evropskemu načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva; poudarja, da ta pregled temelji predvsem na podatkih iz nacionalnih strateških poročil; poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da bodo podatki, ki jih posredujejo države članice, točni;
Welcomes the publication of the Commission Staff Working Paper ‘Cohesion Policy: Responding to the economic crisis’, a review of the implementation of cohesion policy measures adopted in support of the European Economic Recovery Plan; highlights that this review draws primarily on the information provided in national strategic reports; calls for the Commission to take the necessary measures in order to ensure that the information provided by the Member States is accurate;
poudarja, da zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize ter trenutno upočasnjene gospodarske rasti kohezijska politika EU odločilno prispeva k evropskemu načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva, saj je glavni vir naložb Skupnosti v realno gospodarstvo in dokazano omogoča prožen in primerno hiter odziv na vse slabše socialno-ekonomsko okolje; poudarja, da so države članice z odobravanjem sprejele dejstvo, da se lahko krizni ukrepi oblikujejo v skladu z njihovimi specifičnimi potrebami; kljub temu poziva k večji prilagodljivosti in zmanjšanju zapletenosti pravil za boj proti krizi ter spodbuja države članice, naj takoj uporabijo vse ukrepe, ki jim jih je dala na voljo Komisija, da bi zagotovile ustrezen in pravočasen odziv na specifične potrebe ter uspešen izhod iz krize, da se doseže dolgoročen trajnostni razvoj s krepitvijo konkurenčnosti, zaposlovanja in privlačnosti evropskih regij;
Notes that, in the context of the global financial and economic crisis and the current economic slowdown, the EU cohesion policy decisively contributes to the European Economic Recovery Plan, constituting the largest Community source of investment in the real economy, and has proven to allow a flexible and appropriate response to the rapidly deteriorating socioeconomic environment; underlines that Member States appreciated that the crisis measures could be tailored to their specific needs; calls nonetheless for greater flexibility and reduced complexity in the rules to combat crisis and encourages Member States to use promptly all measures made available by the Commission to ensure an appropriate and timely reaction according to specific needs as well as a successful exit from the crisis to achieve long-term sustainable development by strengthening competitiveness, employment and the attractiveness of European Regions;
poudarja pomembnost dodatnih prizadevanj za preseganje težav pri merjenju splošnega učinka nekega ukrepa iz evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, povezanega s kohezijsko politiko, ter obžaluje, da pregled zato podaja zgolj omejen vpogled v konkretne primere na nacionalni ravni; kljub temu pozdravlja analizo dobre prakse in prve zaključke, predstavljene v poročilu;
Stresses the importance of making supplementary efforts to overcome the difficulty of measuring the overall impact of specific cohesion policy-related measures under the EERP, and regrets that the review therefore can only give limited insights into concrete examples at national level; nevertheless welcomes the analysis of good practices and first conclusions presented in the report;
meni, da so znaki oživljanja po krizi šibki ter da mora Evropa v prihodnjih letih odpraviti svoje strukturne slabosti, tudi s posegi kohezijske politike in ciljnimi naložbami, zlasti v raziskave in razvoj, inovacije, izobraževanje in tehnologije, ki so za vse sektorje koristne pri pridobivanju konkurenčnosti; zato poudarja, da je nujno potrebna temeljita analiza učinka ukrepov za reševanje krize, treba pa je priskrbeti tudi dostopno financiranje iz strukturnih skladov, ki je močan mehanizem, oblikovan za pomoč regijam pri gospodarskem in socialnem prestrukturiranju ter pri spodbujanju gospodarske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije ter solidarnosti;
Considers that the signs of recovery from the crisis are fragile, and that in the coming years Europe has to tackle its structural weaknesses, including through Cohesion Policy interventions and targeted investments notably in research and development, innovation, education and technologies that are beneficial for all sectors in acquiring competitiveness; stresses therefore the need for a thorough analysis of the impact of measures aimed at counteracting the crisis and the necessity to provide for accessible structural funding, which is a powerful mechanism designed to help the regions in their economic and social restructuring and in promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion and solidarity;
Ustvarjanje sinergij in izogibanje razpršenosti sredstev regionalne politike na več področij
Creating synergies and avoiding the sectoral dispersion of regional policy resources
se strinja s stališčem Sveta, izraženem v sklepih Sveta o strateškem poročilu za 2010, o resnični dodani vrednosti zaradi enega samega strateškega in celostnega pristopa za strukturne sklade; opozarja, da potrebuje vsak sklad svoja pravila za zagotavljanje uspešnih posegov v praksi v posameznih okoliščinah; poudarja tudi, da je v obdobju po krizi treba konsolidirati javne proračune in z učinkovitim usklajevanjem povečati sinergije ter vpliv vseh razpoložljivih virov financiranja (EU, nacionalnih, iz instrumentov Evropske investicijske banke);
Shares the view of the Council expressed in the Council Conclusions on the Strategic Report 2010 on the real added value generated by one strategic and integrated approach for the structural funds; recalls that each fund needs its own rules for successful interventions on the ground in specific situations; stresses, as well, the need in the post-crisis era to consolidate public budgets and increase synergies and the impact of all available funding sources (EU, national, EIB instruments) through effective coordination;
poudarja, da so sinergije med strukturnimi skladi in drugimi instrumenti sektorske politike ter med temi instrumenti in nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi viri, nujne in ustvarjajo dragocene povezave, ki omogočajo skupno krepitev, trajnostno izvajanje programov in doseganje teritorialne kohezije; priznava, da ima na podlagi določb o namenitvi sredstev za obdobje 2007–2013 kohezijska politika več sredstev za ustvarjanje sinergij z raziskovalnimi in inovacijskimi politikami; poudarja, da se lahko strukturni skladi uporabijo za okrepitev raziskovalne infrastrukture, da bi raziskave dosegle raven odličnosti, potrebno za dostop do sredstev za raziskave; poudarja tudi prednosti sinergij med Evropskim skladom za regionalni razvoj, Evropskim socialnim skladom in Evropskim kmetijskim skladom za razvoj podeželja; ugotavlja, da izkušnje jasno kažejo, da je uspešno izvajanje programov, financiranih iz Evropskega socialnega sklada, nujno za čim učinkovitejše financiranje gospodarskih ukrepov iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj; v zvezi s tem poudarja potencial navzkrižnega financiranja, ki še ni v celoti izkoriščen; poziva Komisijo, naj v prihodnje strateško poročilo uvede sklicevanje na medsebojni vpliv strukturnih skladov ter njihovo vzajemno delovanje z drugimi finančnimi instrumenti EU;
Stresses that synergies between structural funds and other sectoral policy instruments, and between these instruments and national, regional and local resources, are vital and create valuable links allowing mutual reinforcement, sustainable implementation of programmes and achievement of territorial cohesion; acknowledges that, through the earmarking provisions for 2007-2013, cohesion policy is better geared to create synergies with research and innovation policies; underlines that Structural Funds could be used to enhance research infrastructure, ensuring the level of excellence necessary for access to research funds; also highlights the benefits of synergies between ERDF, ESF and EAFRD; notes that experience clearly proves that successful performance of ESF-financed programmes is essential in order to maximise the effectiveness of ERDF funding for economic actions; recalls in this context the potential of cross-financing which is not yet fully exploited; with a view to the next Strategic Report, invites the Commission to introduce a reference to mutual interaction between Structural Funds as well as their interaction with other EU financial instruments;
poudarja, da tehnična pomoč, spremljanje in ocenjevanje spodbujajo učenje politike in bodo skupaj z učinkovitim finančnim nadzorom tvorili spodbudo za bolj kakovostno izvajanje;
Underlines that technical assistance, monitoring and evaluation stimulate policy learning and, together with an efficient financial control will constitute an incentive to improve the quality of performance;
obžaluje, da je zgolj 19 držav članic poročalo o temeljnih kazalnikih, zato v tej fazi še ni mogoče dobiti prve jasne slike o konkretnih vplivih politike za celotno EU; odločno spodbuja države članice k uporabi temeljnih kazalnikov v naslednjem krogu strateškega poročanja za 2012–2013; poziva Komisijo, naj posreduje ter državam članicam in regijam pomaga pri zagotavljanju pravočasnih, usklajenih in popolnih podatkov;
Regrets that only 19 Member States reported on core indicators and therefore at this stage it is impossible to have a first clear EU-wide picture of the impact of the policy on the ground; strongly encourages Member States to use core indicators in the next round of the strategic reporting exercise in 2012-2013; calls on the Commission to step in and provide support for Member States and regions to produce timely, coherent and complete data;
poudarja, da mora Komisija zagotoviti učinkovite in stalne sisteme za spremljanje in nadzor, da se izboljša upravljanje in učinkovitost sistema izvajanja strukturnih skladov; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi natančnejša navodila in tako okrepi skladnost in kakovost spremljanja napredka držav članic z uvedbo obvezne uporabe minimalnega nabora temeljnih kazalnikov v nacionalnih strateških poročilih za naslednje programsko obdobje, kar bo olajšalo primerjavo in usmeritev v rezultate;
Underlines the need for the Commission to ensure efficient and constant monitoring and control systems in order to improve governance and effectiveness of the delivery system of the Structural Funds; calls on the Commission to enhance the coherence and quality of monitoring of the progress made by Member States by making obligatory the use of a minimum set of core indicators in national strategic reports in the next programming period to facilitate comparison and result-orientation, by providing more detailed guidance;
meni, da je treba izpostaviti dobro prakso pri izvajanju politike in spodbujati njeno izmenjavo, vzporedno pa krepiti upravne zmogljivosti, zlasti lokalnih in regionalnih organov, da bi izboljšali učinkovitost in se izognili ponavljanju napak;
Considers that good practices and mutual learning in policy implementation must be highlighted and their exchange promoted, alongside reinforcement of administrative capacities, in particular of local and regional authorities, in order to improve efficiency and effectiveness and avoid repetition of past mistakes;
spodbuja dobro prakso v nacionalnih poročilih, kot je uporaba temeljnih kazalnikov, poročanje o rezultatih in učinkih ter o sinergijah med nacionalnimi politikami in politikami EU, organiziranje javnih razprav in posvetovanj z interesnimi skupinami, posredovanje poročil nacionalnim parlamentom za mnenje ter objava poročil na vladnih spletiščih (pri čemer vsa poročila uporabljajo jasno in jedrnato terminologijo), saj vse to izboljšuje kakovost poročanja in povečuje odgovornost interesnih skupin v državah članicah; vztraja pri potrebi po upoštevanju najboljše prakse v regijah, za katere je značilna nizka stopnja absorpcije ali učinkovitosti v zvezi s programi financiranja;
Encourages good practices related to national reporting such as using core indicators, reporting on results and outputs, reporting on synergies between national policies and EU policies, organising public debates and consultations with stakeholders, submitting the reports to national parliaments for opinions and publishing the reports on governmental websites (with all reports using clear and concise terminology), as these practices improve the quality of the reporting exercise and increase the ownership of stakeholders within Member States; insists on the need to follow best practice in regions characterised by a lower degree of absorption or efficiency in respect of funding programmes;
pozdravlja določila Komisije o tem, kako naj nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi oblasti ponovno uskladijo operativne programe s cilji trajnostne rasti EU 2020 in kako se lahko praksa ponovno osredotoči na cilje pametne rasti v tem programskem obdobju; poziva države članice, naj nemudoma ukrepajo, vlagajo več v trajnostni razvoj ter pametno rast, socialno vključenost in enakost spolov na trgu dela in učinkoviteje porabljajo sredstva; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj začne razpravo o načinih, kako lahko kohezijska politika v tekočem obdobju 2007–2013 prispeva k ciljem strategije Evropa 2020;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission sets out how national, regional and local authorities can realign operational programmes to EU 2020 sustainable growth objectives, and how practices can be refocused towards smart growth objectives during this programming period; calls on Member States to act without delay, invest more in sustainable development and smart growth, social inclusion and gender equality in the labour market and use funds more effectively; calls furthermore on the Commission to launch a debate to elaborate further on how cohesion policy can, over the current period 2007-2013, contribute to the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy;
poudarja vlogo malih in srednjih podjetij kot inovativnih akterjev v gospodarstvu ter opozarja, da je treba sektor razviti med drugim z izvajanjem Akta za mala podjetja, malim in srednjim podjetjem olajšati dostop financiranja in obratnih sredstev, ter jih spodbujati, naj se vključijo v inovativne projekte, da bi se okrepila njihova konkurenčnost in možnost za povečanje števila delovnih mest; poudarja številne socialne in ekonomske koristi, ki jih lahko ima sodelovanje med javnimi organi na regionalni in lokalni ravni, malimi in srednjimi podjetji, poslovnimi omrežji, raziskovalnimi instituti in grozdi ter učinkovita uporaba vseh razpoložljivih virov, vključno z instrumenti finančnega inženiringa (Jeremie) kot elementov za kapitalsko krepitev malih in srednjih podjetij; kljub temu poudarja, da je treba pri financiranju s posojili izboljšati pravno varnost tako, da lahko finančni posredniki in promocijske banke določijo pogoje za inovativne finančne instrumente, ki se med programskim obdobjem ne bodo spreminjali;
Underlines the role of SMEs as innovative players in the economy and stresses the need to develop this sector inter alia through the implementation of the Small Business Act, facilitate SMEs' access to financing and operating capital and encourage SMEs to become involved in innovative projects with a view to strengthening their competitiveness and potential for greater employment; stresses that many social and economic benefits are to be gained from cooperation at the local and regional levels between the public authorities, SMEs, business networks, research institutes and clusters, as well as from the effective use of all existing resources, including the financial engineering instruments (Jeremie) as elements of capital reinforcement for SMEs; nevertheless underlines that, regarding loan financing, legal certainty needs to be improved in such a way that financial intermediaries and promotional banks can set up conditions for innovative financial instruments that will remain valid for the whole programming period;
je trdno prepričan, da sta dobro upravljanje na evropski, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni ter učinkovito sodelovanje med različnimi ravnmi vladanja temelj za zagotavljanje kakovostnega postopka odločanja, strateškega načrtovanja, izboljšanja absorpcijske zmogljivosti strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov, s tem pa uspešnega ter učinkovitega izvajanja kohezijske politike; spodbuja Komisijo in države članice, naj okrepijo in uporabljajo upravljanje na več ravneh v skladu s Pogodbo ter načeloma subsidiarnosti in partnerstva; zato poudarja pomembnost prave partnerske strategije, vertikalno in horizontalno, ter priporoča, naj se oceni kakovost vključenosti v partnerstvo, pri čemer opozarja, da lahko partnerstvo prinaša poenostavitev, zlasti v postopku izbire projektov; poziva države članice, naj od začetka vključijo poddržavne ravni v opredeljevanje naložbenih prednostnih nalog in v sam postopek odločanja ter naj v izvajanje programov vključijo akterje civilne družbe in predstavnike skupnosti; predlaga, da se sprejme „teritorialni pakt lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti za strategijo Evropa 2020“ v vsaki državi članici;
Strongly believes that good governance at European, national, regional and local level and effective cooperation between the various levels of government are fundamental to ensuring the quality of the decision-making process, strategic planning, improved absorption capacity of Structural and Cohesion Funds and therefore the successful and efficient implementation of cohesion policy; encourages the Commission and the Member States to strengthen and mobilise multi-level governance in accordance with the Treaty and the subsidiarity and partnership principles; stresses therefore the importance of a genuine partnership strategy, both vertically and horizontally, and recommends that the quality of partnership involvement be assessed, recalling that partnership may lead to simplification, particularly in the project selection procedure; calls on Member States to involve the sub-national levels from the outset in defining the investment priorities and in the decision-making process itself, as well as to integrate them with civil society actors and community representatives in the implementation of programmes; proposes, in this context, the establishment of a Territorial Pact of Local and Regional Authorities on the Europe 2020 Strategy in every Member State;
meni, da mora poenostavljanje določb in postopkov pomagati k hitremu dodeljevanju sredstev in izplačevanju ter da se mora zato nadaljevati, rezultat pa morajo biti boljša pravila v obdobju po letu 2013, na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni, ne da bi to upravičencem povzročalo večje težave; meni, da je treba regionalno politiko bolje prilagoditi potrebam uporabnikov in da bi morala poenostavitev zmanjšati nepotrebne upravne ovire in stroške ter druge ovire, ki onemogočajo uresničevanje političnih ciljev, preprečevati bi morala zmedo in neustrezne razlage, pogoste v sedanji upravni praksi, na drugi strani pa bi morala zagotoviti bolj prožno upravljanje projektov, usklajen nadzor in večjo učinkovitost politike; obžaluje, da ostane veliko sredstev neuporabljenih zaradi odvečne birokracije, prezapletenih pravil, ki se pogosto spreminjajo, in premalo usklajenih postopkov; meni, da je treba vzpostaviti ravnovesje med poenostavljanjem ter trdnostjo pravil in postopkov;
Believes that simplification of provisions and procedures should contribute to the speedy allocation of funds and payments, and that it should therefore continue and should result in improved rules in the post-2013 period, both at EU and national level without creating major difficulties for the beneficiaries; considers that regional policy should be better adapted to the needs of users and that simplification should reduce unnecessary administrative barriers and costs as well as other obstacles hampering policy goals, should avoid confusion and erroneous interpretation of current administrative practices and should, on the other hand, ensure more flexible project management, synchronised controls, and increased efficiency of the policy; deplores that, due to superfluous bureaucracy, overcomplicated rules subject to frequent changes and a lack of harmonised procedures, many funds remain unused; considers that a balance needs to be struck between simplification and the stability of rules and procedures;
poziva države članice in regionalne organe, naj okrepijo razvoj zmogljivosti in zmanjšajo upravno breme, zlasti naj zagotovijo sofinanciranje projektov z nacionalnimi prispevki in podporo finančnega inženiringa, da bi se povečala absorpcija sredstev in da bi se izognili dodatnim velikim zamudam pri investicijah;
Calls for the Member States and regional authorities to enhance capacity-building and reduce the administrative burden, in particular to ensure the cofinancing of projects by national contributions and, when relevant, to introduce financial engineering support, in order to increase the absorption of the funds and to avoid further major delays in investing;