natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja sporazum s Kanado, ki bo presegal obveze WTO in dopolnjeval večstranska pravila, a le če bodo pogajanja privedla do uravnoteženega, ambicioznega in izjemno kakovostnega sporazuma, ki bo zajemal precej več kot znižanje tarif; poziva k uporabi načela vzajemnosti v okviru pravnih sredstev, ki so na voljo za reševanje trgovinskih sporov, ter posebej poudarja, da je treba izboljšati zaščito pravic intelektualne lastnine, zlasti blagovnih znamk, patentov in geografskih označb, ter pridobiti resnično vzajemen dostop do trga, predvsem za storitve in javna naročila (tudi na podzvezni ravni);
Welcomes an agreement with Canada going beyond the WTO commitments and being complementary to multilateral rules, provided that the negotiations produce a balanced, ambitious, high-quality agreement that goes well beyond tariff reductions; calls for the reciprocity principle to be applied in the context of the legal remedies available in the event of commercial disputes and emphasises in particular the need to improve the protection of intellectual property rights including trademarks, patents and geographical indications and to obtain genuinely reciprocal access to the market, especially to services and public procurement markets (including at sub-federal level);
poziva Komisijo naj v znak dobre volje opusti izpodbijanje lokalnih zahtev zakona province Ontario o zeleni energiji;
Calls on the Commission, as a sign of good will, to drop its challenges against the Ontario Green Energy Act's local content requirements;
meni, da poglavje o intelektualni lastnini ne sme negativno vplivati na proizvodnjo generičnih zdravil in da mora upoštevati izjeme v sporazumu TRIPS o javnem zdravju;
Considers that the chapter on intellectual property should not negatively affect the production of generic medicines and must respect the TRIPs exceptions for public health;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija pri liberalizaciji storitev izbrala pristop negativnega seznama, a meni, da mora biti to zgolj izjema, ne pa precedenčni primer, na katerem bi slonela prihodnja pogajanja; meni, da izjema javnih podjetij v Splošnem sporazumu o trgovini s storitvami ostaja najustreznejše orodje, s katerim se državljanom zagotavlja splošni dostop do javnih storitev;
Notes that the Commission has chosen a ‘negative list approach’ for the liberalisation of services, but considers that this should be seen as a mere exception and not serve as a precedent for future negotiations; considers that the GATS public utilities exemption remains the most appropriate tool to guarantee universal access to public services to citizens;
izraža zaskrbljenost, da se v kanadskih rudnikih še naprej pridobiva azbest, in opozarja, da ta resno vpliva na zdravje delavcev; opozarja, da je EU v celoti prepovedala uporabo, pridobivanje in predelavo azbesta ter trgovino s proizvodi iz azbesta; poziva Kanado, naj izboljša javno zdravje in sprejme podoben ukrep;
Expresses its concern about the continued mining of asbestos in Canada and its grave impact on workers' health; recalls that the EU has banned all use, extraction and processing of asbestos and manufacture of asbestos products; calls on Canada to take similar action in order to improve public health;
glede na dopolnjevanje obeh gospodarstev opozarja na možnost večje trgovine in naložb med EU in Kanado v prihodnje ter na naložbene in poslovne priložnosti, ki izhajajo iz celovitega gospodarskega in trgovinskega sporazuma;
On the basis of the complementarities of the two economies, points to the future potential for an increase in EU-Canada trade and investment and business opportunities arising from the CETA;
meni, da mora biti ambicioznost Komisije pri pogajanjih s Kanado uravnotežena s prav tako ambicioznim pristopom k trajnostnemu razvoju, predvsem s spoštovanjem ravni obveznosti do delavcev, obsega poglavja o okolju, načina obravnave vprašanj iz večstranskega okoljskega sporazuma ter mehanizma izvajanja, prav tako pa mora podpirati in spodbujati pobude za reševanje podnebnih sprememb, spodbujanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic ter socialnih in okoljskih standardov ter spodbujanje družbene odgovornosti gospodarskih družb;
Believes that the Commission's level of ambition in discussions with Canada should be balanced by an equally ambitious approach to sustainable development, in particular with respect to the level of obligations towards labour, the scope of the environment chapter and the way to address Multilateral Environmental Agreement (MEA) issues as well as the enforcement mechanism, and should support and promote initiatives to help tackle climate change, promote legally binding human rights and social and environmental standards, and promote corporate social responsibility;
pozdravlja napredek pri pogajanjih o celovitem gospodarskem in trgovinskem sporazumu ter spodbuja Komisijo, naj se še naprej posvetuje z najpomembnejšimi zainteresiranimi stranmi; čeprav je skupna študija pokazala precejšnje morebitne prednosti za EU in Kanado, poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej izvede celovito presojo vpliva na trajnost, ki bo ocenila predvidene sektorske in socialno-ekonomske posledice končnega sporazuma za EU;
Welcomes the progress made in the CETA negotiations and encourages the Commission to continue to consult with key stakeholders; even though the Joint Study demonstrated significant potential gains for both Canada and the EU, calls on the Commission to carry out as soon as possible a comprehensive sustainability impact assessment evaluating the foreseeable sectoral implications and socioeconomic consequences for the EU arising from the final agreement;
opaža, da je za odnose EU-Kanada pristojna le zvezna raven, ker pa so kanadske province in ozemlja odgovorni za izvajanje pogodbenih obveznosti, ki sodijo v njihovo pristojnost, pozdravlja njihovo sodelovanje pri pogajanjih o celovitem gospodarskem in trgovinskem sporazumu, meni, da je tako sodelovanje bistveno, ter jih spodbuja k uskladitvi politik in postopkov, da bi poskusili doseči čim večji izkoristek; meni, da morajo uspešna pogajanja vključevati tudi izrecne zaveze vlad provinc in ozemelj;
Notes that competence for EU-Canada relations resides at the federal level alone, but, since the Canadian provinces and territories are responsible for implementing the treaty obligations that fall within their jurisdiction, considers essential, and welcomes, their participation in the CETA negotiations and encourages the provinces and territories to synchronise policies and procedures to allow potential gains to be maximised; considers that a successful negotiation should include explicit commitments from provincial and territorial governments;
nekoliko zaskrbljeno ugotavlja, da je Komisija Svetu predložila predlog spremembe pogajalskih smernic, ki bi tako Komisijo pooblastile, da se s Kanado lahko pogaja o naložbah, ne da bi počakala, da Parlament sprejme svoje stališče o prihodnji splošni naložbeni politiki EU; poziva Komisijo, naj pri pogajanjih o naložbah s Kanado v celoti upošteva sklep Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi s tem; meni, da sta glede na izjemno razvit pravni sistem v Kanadi in EU najprimernejši orodji za obravnavo sporov v zvezi z naložbami meddržavni mehanizem za reševanje sporov in uporaba lokalnih pravnih sredstev; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da morebitni mehanizem za poravnavo sporov med vlagateljem in državo ne bo oviral prihodnje zakonodaje na občutljivih političnih področjih, na primer okoljski zakonodaji, in da bo vključen v širše zahteve, kakor jih je Parlament opredelil v resoluciji o prihodnji evropski mednarodni naložbeni politiki;
Notes, not without concern, that the Commission submitted to the Council a proposal for modifying the negotiating directives authorising the Commission to negotiate with Canada on investment without waiting for Parliament to adopt its position on the future EU investment policy in general; calls on the Commission to take fully into account the conclusion of the European Parliament on this subject in its negotiations on investment with Canada; considers that, given the highly developed legal systems of Canada and the EU, a state-to-state dispute settlement mechanism and the use of local judicial remedies are the most appropriate tools to address investment disputes; calls on the Commission to ensure that a potential investor-to-state dispute settlement mechanism does not inhibit future legislation in sensitive policy areas, such as environmental legislation, and is embedded in broader requirements as outlined in Parliament's resolution on future European international investment policy;
poudarja, da bi moralo poglavje o naložbah spodbujati kakovostne naložbe, ki spoštujejo okolje in spodbujajo dobre delovne razmere; poleg tega zahteva, da se v poglavju o naložbah spoštuje pravica obeh strani do zakonskega urejanja, zlasti na področju državne varnosti, okolja, javnega zdravja, pravic delavcev in potrošnikov, industrijske politike ter kulturne raznolikosti; poziva Komisijo, naj iz področja uporabe sporazumov o naložbah izključi občutljive sektorje, kot so kultura, izobraževanje, obramba države in javno zdravje;
Stresses that the investment chapter should promote high-quality investments which respect the environment and encourage good working conditions; furthermore calls for the investment chapter to respect the right of both parties to regulate, in particular in the areas of national security, the environment, public health, workers' and consumers' rights, industrial policy and cultural diversity; calls on the Commission to exclude from the scope of investment agreements sensitive sectors such as culture, education, national defence and public health;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi učinka pridobivanja naftnega peska na okolje na svetovni ravni zaradi visoke ravni emisij CO2 med proizvodnim procesom in grožnje, ki jo ta predstavlja za lokalno biotsko raznovrstnost; izraža prepričanje, da pogajanja o celovitem gospodarskem in trgovinskem sporazumu ne smejo vplivati na pravico EU do sprejemanja zakonodaje z direktivo o kakovosti goriva ali preprečiti kanadskim oblastem, da ne bi uvedle prihodnjih okoljskih standardov za pridobivanje naftnega peska; poziva obe strani, naj morebitna nesoglasja razrešita prijateljsko in brez ogrožanja pogajanj o celovitem gospodarskem in trgovinskem sporazumu;
Reiterates its concern about the impact of the extraction of oil sand on the global environment due to the high level of CO2 emissions during its production process and the threat it poses to local biodiversity; expresses its belief that the CETA negotiations should not affect the EU's right to legislate in the fuel quality directive or inhibit the ability of the Canadian authorities to introduce future environmental standards concerning the extraction of oil sands; encourages both parties to resolve any disagreements amicably and without endangering the CETA negotiations;
je seznanjen z nedavnim pravnim razvojem glede prepovedi EU za izdelke iz tjulenjev, zlasti s kanadsko zahtevo Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji o vzpostavitvi uradnega sosveta za reševanje sporov; pričakuje, da bo Komisija vztrajala pri stališču EU glede prepovedi proizvodov iz tjulenjev in izraža močno upanje, da bo Kanada umaknila zahtevek za izpodbijanje v WTO, ki je v nasprotju s pozitivnimi trgovinskimi odnosi, preden bo moral Evropski parlament ratificirati Celoviti gospodarski in trgovinski sporazum;
Takes note of the recent legal developments regarding the EU's ban on seal products, in particular Canada's request to the WTO for the establishment of a formal dispute resolution panel; expects the Commission to remain firm on the EU's stance regarding the ban on seal products, and expresses its strong hope that Canada will withdraw the WTO challenge, which runs counter to positive trade relations, prior to the need for ratification of the CETA agreement by the European Parliament;
opozarja na različne politike glede regulacije gensko spremenjenih organizmov, ki sta jih uzakonili Evropska unija in Kanada; opozarja, da bi zasebna podjetja prek mehanizma za reševanje sporov, predlaganega v Celovitem gospodarskem in trgovinskem sporazumu, lahko spodbijala strožjo ureditev, ki jo je uzakonila EU;
Draws the attention to different policies enacted by the EU and Canada regarding the regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs); warns that the stricter regulations enacted in the EU could be challenged by private companies under the proposed CETA dispute-settlement mechanism;
meni, da bodo v teh pogajanjih za obe strani pomembna poglavja o kmetijstvu; je zaskrbljen zaradi nevarnosti precejšnjih kompromisov na področju gensko spremenjenih organizmov, mleka in označevanja izvora; zato poudarja, da je treba v celoti upoštevati interese in prednostne naloge v kmetijstvu, ter poziva Komisijo, naj s pogajanji doseže sporazum, ki bo koristil evropskim in kanadskim potrošnikom, pa tudi kmetijskima sektorjema na obeh straneh, ter v okviru uravnoteženega skupnega rezultata zagotovi večjo, a pošteno konkurenco med evropskimi in kanadskimi dobavitelji pri zagotavljanju kmetijskih proizvodov; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja prvotno zavezo obeh strani, da ne bosta ohranili, uvedli ali ponovno uvedli kmetijskih izvoznih subvencij za kmetijske proizvode, s katerimi trgujeta, ter meni, da je to pozitiven korak k ambicioznim in poštenim pogajanjem, pozdravlja pa tudi dogovor o sodelovanju pri kmetijskih pogajanjih v okviru WTO;
Considers that agriculture chapters will constitute an important issue for both parties in these negotiations; is concerned about possibly substantial concessions in the area of GMOs, milk and origin labelling; therefore stresses that the interests and the priorities in agriculture should be fully taken into account and calls on the Commission to negotiate an agreement which will be beneficial to EU and Canadian consumers and to the agricultural sectors on both sides as well, and ensure, within a balanced overall outcome, greater – but fair – competition among EU and Canadian suppliers to provide agricultural goods; welcomes in this context the initial commitment from both parties not to maintain, introduce or reintroduce agricultural export subsidies on the agricultural goods traded, this being a positive step in the interests of ambitious and fair negotiations, as well as the agreement to cooperate in WTO agricultural negotiations;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj v duhu skladnosti politik Unije in zlasti tistih, ki zadevajo čezmorske države in ozemlja, poskrbi, da bodo v prihodnjem sporazumu med EU in Kanado ohranjeni njihovi interesi v zvezi z njihovimi strateškimi izdelki;
Calls on the Commission, with a view to ensuring the consistency of EU policies, in particular those concerning overseas countries and territories (OCTs), to make sure that the interests of OCTs in relation to their strategic products are protected in the future agreement between the EU and Canada;
poudarja, da so pogajanja o sanitarnih in fitosanitarnih ukrepih pomembno vprašanje v poglavjih o kmetijstvu; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj se zaveže, da se bo pogajala za pravila, ki bodo ohranila visok standard;
Stresses that negotiations on sanitary and phytosanitary measures are a major issue in agricultural chapters; in this context calls on the Commission to commit itself to negotiate rules concerning them which maintain a high standard;
spominja Svet in Komisijo, da mora Svet od začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe od Parlamenta pridobiti odobritev za vse mednarodne trgovinske sporazume, Svet in Komisija pa morata v vseh fazah postopka sproti in v celoti obveščati Parlament; poziva Svet, naj Parlamentu v fazah postopka, za katere je pristojen, sproti zagotavlja vse informacije, zlasti glede sprejetih pogajalskih smernic in vseh njihovih spremembah; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj Parlament vključita v vse faze pogajanj in v celoti upoštevata njegova stališča;
Reminds the Council and Commission that, since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the Council has been required to obtain the consent of Parliament for all international trade agreements and both the Council and the Commission have been required to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure; calls on the Council to provide Parliament immediately with all information in the stages of the procedure for which it is responsible, in particular concerning the negotiating directives it has adopted and any modifications thereof; calls on the Council and the Commission to keep Parliament involved at all stages of the negotiations and to take Parliament's views fully into account;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, zvezni vladi in parlamentu Kanade ter vladam in parlamentom kanadskih provinc in ozemelj.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the federal Government and Parliament and provincial and territorial governments and parliaments of Canada.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. junija 2011 o bonitetnih agencijah: prihodnje perspektive ( 2010/2302(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 8 June 2011 on credit rating agencies: future perspectives ( 2010/2302(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sestavka Mednarodne organizacije komisij za vrednostne papirje (IOSCO) z naslovom „International cooperation in oversight of credit rating agencies“ (Mednarodno sodelovanje pri nadzoru bonitetnih agencij) iz marca 2009,
having regard to the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) note of March 2009 on ‘International cooperation in oversight of credit rating agencies’,
ob upoštevanju poročila Skupnega foruma z naslovom „Stocktaking on the use of credit ratings“ (Pregled stanja glede uporabe bonitetnih ocen) iz junija 2009,
having regard to the Joint Forum on ‘Stocktaking on the use of credit ratings’ in June 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za finančno stabilnost z naslovom „Improving financial regulation“ (Izboljšanje finančne zakonodaje), namenjenega voditeljem skupine G20, z dne 25. septembra 2009,
having regard to the report of the Financial Stability Board to G20 leaders entitled ‘Improving financial regulation’ of 25 September 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Mednarodnega denarnega sklada z naslovom „Global Financial Stability Report: Sovereigns, Funding and Systemic Liquidity“ (Svetovna finančna stabilnost: države, financiranje in likvidnost sistema) z dne 29. oktobra 2010,
having regard to the International Monetary Fund report of 29 October 2010 entitled ‘Global Financial Stability Report: Sovereigns, Funding and Systemic Liquidity’,
ob upoštevanju izjave z vrhunskega srečanja skupine G20 v Torontu 26. in 27. junija 2010,
having regard to the declaration of the G20 Toronto Summit of 26 and 27 June 2010,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za finančno stabilnost z naslovom „Principles for reducing reliance on CRA ratings“ (Načela za zmanjševanje zanašanja na ocene bonitetnih agencij) z dne 27. oktobra 2010,
having regard to the report by the Financial Stability Board on ‘Principles for reducing reliance on CRA ratings’ of 27 October 2010,
ob upoštevanju javnega posvetovanja, ki ga je Komisija začela 5. novembra 2010,
having regard to the public consultation launched by the Commission on 5 November 2010,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0081/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0081/2011 ),
ker pozdravlja trenutno delo na svetovni, mednarodni in evropski ravni na področju regulacije bonitetnih agencij,
whereas it welcomes the ongoing work at global, international and European level on the regulation of credit rating agencies (CRAs),
ker naj bi bile bonitetne agencije posrednice informacij, ki zmanjšujejo asimetrije informacij na kapitalskih trgih in olajšujejo dostop do globalnega trga, znižujejo stroške informacij in širijo skupino možnih posojilojemalcev in vlagateljev ter tako zagotavljajo likvidnost in preglednost na trgih in lajšajo določanje cen,
whereas CRAs are supposed to be information intermediaries, reducing information asymmetries in the capital markets and facilitating global market access, reducing information costs and widening the potential pool of borrowers and investors, thus providing liquidity and transparency to markets and helping find prices,
ker so v novi zakonodaji bonitetne agencije dobile novo vlogo, ki jo je mogoče opredeliti kot vlogo „potrjevanja“, kar odraža dejstvo, da so bonitetne ocene vse bolj vgrajene v regulativne kapitalske zahteve,
whereas, in recent legislation, CRAs have been assigned another role which can be classified as one of ‘certification’, reflecting the fact that ratings are increasingly embedded in regulatory capital requirements,
ker se finančni subjekti preveč zanašajo na presojo bonitetnih agencij,
whereas financial operators have placed excessive reliance on the judgments made by CRAs,
ker bonitetne agencije ocenjujejo tri različne sektorje, namreč javni sektor, podjetja in strukturirane finančne instrumente, in ker so bonitetne agencije z napačnimi ocenami strukturiranih finančnih instrumentov, ki jih je bilo treba med krizo v povprečju znižati za tri do štiri stopnje, igrale pomembno vlogo pri nastanku finančne krize,
whereas CRAs rate three different sectors, the public sector, companies and structured finance instruments, and whereas CRAs played a significant role in the build-up to the financial crisis through the assignment of faulty ratings to structured finance instruments, which had to be downgraded on average three to four notches during the crisis,
ker je bila Uredba (ES) št. 1060/2009 prvi odziv na finančno krizo, ki že obravnava najbolj pereča vprašanja in za bonitetne agencije določa nadzor in regulacijo; ker pa ne obravnava vseh temeljnih težav in v resnici ustvarja nekaj novih vstopnih ovir,
whereas Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 was the first reaction to the financial crisis and already deals with the most pressing issues, subjecting CRAs to oversight and regulation; whereas, however, it does not address all the fundamental problems and, in fact, creates some new barriers to entry,
ker pomanjkanje regulativne varnosti v tem sektorju ogroža pravilno delovanje finančnih trgov EU in bi morala zato Komisija, preden predlaga nadaljnje spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1060/2009, pravilno prepoznati vrzeli v novem okviru in zagotoviti oceno učinka na vrsto drugih možnosti, ki so na voljo za zapolnitev takih vrzeli, vključno z možnostjo nadaljnjih zakonodajnih predlogov,
whereas the absence of regulatory certainty in this sector is putting the proper functioning of EU financial markets at risk and therefore requires the EU Commission, before coming forward with further amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009, to identify properly the gaps in the new framework and provide an impact assessment on the range of alternatives available to fill such gaps including the possibility of further legislative proposals.
ker se panoga bonitetnega ocenjevanja sooča s številnimi težavami, med katerimi so najpomembnejše pomanjkanje konkurence, oligopolne strukture ter pomanjkanje odgovornosti in preglednosti; ker je težava prevladujočih bonitetnih agencij zlasti v plačilnem modelu in ker je ključna težava regulativnega sistema preveliko zanašanje na zunanje bonitetne ocene,
whereas the credit rating industry has various problems, amongst which the most important are the lack of competition, oligolistic structures and the lack of accountability and transparency; whereas a problem of the dominant rating agencies in particular is the payment model and whereas the regulatory system's key problem is over-reliance on external credit ratings,
ker bi bil najboljši način za okrepitev konkurence oblikovanje regulativnega okolja, ki bi učinkovito spodbujalo vstop, ter poglobljena analiza sedanjih vstopnih ovir ter drugih dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na konkurenco,
whereas the best way to enhance competition would be to create a regulatory environment effective at promoting entry, and to undertake a deeper analysis of the current barriers to entry and other factors affecting competition,