natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
, z dne 19. januarja 2011 o razmerah na Haitiju leto po potresu: humanitarna pomoč in obnova Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0018 .
, of 19 January 2011 on ‘the situation in Haiti one year after the earthquake: humanitarian aid and reconstruction’ Texts adopted P7_TA(2011)0018 .
, z dne 10. februarja 2010 o nedavnem potresu na Haitiju UL C 341 E, 16.12.2010, str.
, of 10 February 2010 on ‘the recent earthquake in Haiti’ OJ C 341 E, 16.12.2010, p.
, z dne 29. novembra 2007 o evropskem soglasju o človekoljubni pomoči in z dne 18. januarja 2011 o izvajanju soglasja glede humanitarne pomoči: vmesni pregled akcijskega načrta in nadaljnji ukrepi Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0005 .
, of 29 November 2007 on ‘the proclamation of a European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid’, and of 18 January 2011 on ‘Implementation of the European consensus on humanitarian aid: the mid-term review of its Action Plan and the way forward’ Texts adopted P7_TA(2011)0005 .
o upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 5. maja 2010 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008 UL L 252, 25.9.2010, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 5 May 2010 on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2008 OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p.
in z dne 10. maja 2011 za proračunsko leto 2009 UL L 250, 27.9.2011, str.
and of 10 May 2011 for the financial year 2009 OJ L 250, 27.9.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča o izvajanju proračuna v proračunskem letu 2008 UL C 269, 10.11.2009, str.
having regard to the Annual Reports of the European Court of Auditors (ECA) on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2008 OJ C 269, 10.11.2009, p.
in 2009 UL C 303, 9.11.2010, str.
and the financial year 2009 OJ C 303, 9.11.2010, p.
, skupaj z odgovori institucij,
, together with the Institutions' replies,
ob upoštevanju posebnih poročil Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 3/2006 z naslovom „Odziv humanitarne pomoči Evropske komisije na cunami“, št. 6/2008 z naslovom „Pomoč Evropske komisije za sanacijo po cunamiju in hurikanu Mitch“, št. 15/2009 z naslovom „Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij Združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje“ in št. 3/2011 z naslovom „Učinkovitost in uspešnost prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij Združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih“,
having regard to the ECA's Special reports No 3/2006 on the ‘European Commission Humanitarian Aid Response to the Tsunami’, No 6/2008 on ‘European Commission Rehabilitation Aid following the Tsunami and Hurricane Mitch’, No 15/2009 on ‘EU assistance implemented through United Nations Organisations: decision-making and monitoring’ and No 3/2011 on ‘The Efficiency and Effectiveness of EU Contributions Channelled through United Nations Organisations in Conflict-Affected Countries’,
ob upoštevanju letnih poročil in letnih poročil o dejavnostih za proračunski leti 2009 in 2010 ter prilog generalnega direktorata za humanitarno pomoč in civilno zaščito (GD ECHO),
having regard to the Annual reports and Annual Activity reports for the financial years 2009 and 2010 of the Directorate General for Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (DG ECHO) and its annexes,
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o politiki humanitarne pomoči in njenem izvajanju za leto 2009 ( COM(2010)0138 ) in spremljajočega delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije ( SEC(2011)0398 ),
having regard to the Annual Report on Humanitarian Aid Policy and its implementation in 2009 ( COM(2010)0138 ) and to the Commission staff working paper accompanying it ( SEC(2011)0398 ),
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o politikah Evropske unije glede humanitarne pomoči in civilne zaščite ter o njihovem izvajanju v letu 2010 ( COM(2011)0343 ) in spremljajočega delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije ( SEC(2011)0709 ),
having regard to the Annual Report on the European Union's Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Policies and their implementation in 2010 ( COM(2011)0343 ) and to the Commission staff working paper accompanying it ( SEC(2011)0709 ),
ob upoštevanju okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma med Evropsko komisijo in Združenimi narodi,
having regard to the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement (FAFA) between the European Commission and the United Nations,
ob upoštevanju okvirnega partnerskega sporazuma med Komisijo in humanitarnimi organizacijami,
having regard to the Framework Partnership Agreement between the Commission and humanitarian organisations (FPA),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A7-0444/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A7-0444/2011 ),
ker so se število, pogostost, obseg in resnost humanitarnih nesreč močno povečali in so tovrstne nesreče prizadele več delov sveta;
whereas the number, frequency, scope and severity of humanitarian disasters have dramatically increased, affecting more parts of the world;
ker je treba zaradi vloge EU kot vodilnega svetovnega akterja na področju humanitarne pomoči ter vse večjega števila in pogostosti posredovanja v EU in zunaj nje, k čemur je treba dodati še trenutne proračunske omejitve, poudariti pomen dobrega finančnega poslovodenja v skladu z načeli gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti;
whereas the EU's leading global role as a humanitarian actor and the increase in the number and frequency of interventions inside and outside the EU, in conjunction with the current budgetary constraints, highlight the significance of sound financial management based on the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness;
ker sta hudi katastrofi na Haitiju in v Pakistanu znova pokazali, da je treba izboljšati učinkovitost, hitrost in usklajevanje instrumentov EU za odziv na nesreče;
whereas the mega catastrophes in Haiti and Pakistan have demonstrated once again that the instruments at the EU's disposal for responding to disasters have to be improved in terms of effectiveness, speed and coordination;
Učinkovitost in uspešnost sistema za kontrolo, spremljanje in nadzor generalnega direktorata za humanitarno pomoč in civilno zaščito
Efficiency and effectiveness of the ECHO control, monitoring and supervision system
je seznanjen z odločenostjo GC ECHO, da bo izboljšal učinkovitost in uspešnosti humanitarne pomoči EU, ter s sprejetimi ukrepi;
Notes the determination of DG ECHO and the measures taken to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of EU humanitarian aid;
opominja na mnenje Evropskega računskega sodišča iz letnih poročil, v katerih so sistemi za predhodno kontrolo, spremljanje in nadzor, naknadne revizije ter službe za notranjo revizijo GD ECHO na splošno ocenjeni kot uspešni; kljub temu poudarja, da so na vseh omenjenih področjih mogoče nadaljnje izboljšave;
Recalls the ECA's opinion, as set out in its annual reports, that the overall ex-ante controls, monitoring and supervision systems, ex-post audit activity, and the internal audit functions of DG ECHO are generally effective; stresses, however, that in all these respects there is room for improvement;
Partnerji iz okvirnega sporazuma o partnerstvu: nevladne organizacije
Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) partners: NGOs
ugotavlja, da povezave med GD ECHO ter partnerskimi nevladnimi organizacijami ureja okvirni sporazum o partnerstvu, medtem ko se proračun izvaja z neposrednim centraliziranim upravljanjem;
Notes that the relations between ECHO and its partner NGOs are governed by the FPA, while the method used for budget implementation is direct centralised management;
pozdravlja večjo prilagodljivost in učinkovitost, ki ju omogoča okvirni sporazum o partnerstvu za leto 2008 v primerjavi z okvirnim sporazumom o partnerstvu za leto 2005, na primer bolj v rezultate usmerjen pristop, uvedbo kontrolnih mehanizmov A in P ter poenostavitev in manj nejasnosti zaradi uvedbe smernic; poziva Komisijo, naj prek prihodnjega okvirnega sporazuma o partnerstvu po letu 2012 še naprej izpopolnjuje ukrepe, ki izboljšujejo učinkovitost sodelovanja s partnerji iz okvirnega sporazuma o partnerstvu; poudarja, da je treba izboljšati učinkovitost sodelovanja in zmanjšati pretirano upravno breme za partnerje iz okvirnega sporazuma o partnerstvu, hkrati pa zagotoviti visoko raven odgovornosti in preglednosti;
Welcomes the enhanced flexibility and efficiency afforded by the 2008 FPA, by comparison with the 2005 FPA, including a more result-oriented approach, the introduction of the A- and P-control mechanisms, greater simplification and less ambiguity resulting from the introduction of guidelines; calls on the Commission to continue refining the measures which will improve the efficiency of cooperation with FPA partners in the post-2012 FPA; stresses that improving the efficiency of cooperation and reducing the excessive administrative burden for FPA partners is important, while at the same timing ensuring a high level of accountability and transparency;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo partnerji pravočasno obravnavali slabosti, ugotovljene med rednimi revizijami njihovih sistemov, in da bodo sprejeti potrebni ukrepi, če jih ne bodo; opozarja, da si morajo zunanji revizorji še naprej prizadevati za izboljševanje kakovosti svojih priporočil partnerjem ter pri tem upoštevati posebne strukture partnerjev, da bi zagotovili sprejemanje in izvedljivost teh priporočil; poudarja, da so potrebne nadaljnje izboljšave in standardizacija pri dokumentiranju ocene predlogov za dejavnosti humanitarne pomoči, da se omogoči celovita primerjava;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the weaknesses identified during regular audits of the partners' systems are addressed by them in a timely manner and that the necessary measures are taken if they are not; recalls that the external auditors have to continue working on improving the quality of their recommendations to the partners, taking into account partners' specific structures so as to ensure their acceptance and feasibility; stresses that the documentation of evaluations of proposals for humanitarian aid actions needs to be further streamlined and standardised in order to allow an overall comparison to be made;
meni, da je z vzpostavljenimi mehanizmi za revizijo in spremljanje zagotovljena večja odgovornost glede ocenjevanja učinkovitosti in uspešnosti partnerjev iz okvirnega sporazuma o partnerstvu kot v primeru partnerjev iz ZN; kljub temu poudarja, da mednarodne organizacije, kot so Združeni narodi, ni mogoče primerjati s partnerji iz okvirnega sporazuma o partnerstvu;
Believes that, thanks to the audit and monitoring mechanisms in place, there is greater accountability with regard to evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of the FPA partners than in the case with the UN partners; points out that, however, an international organisation such as the UN cannot be compared to FPA partners;
Mednarodne organizacije, ZN
International organisations, UN
ugotavlja, da odnose med GD ECHO ter njegovimi partnerji iz ZN ureja okvirni finančni in upravni sporazum, medtem ko odnose z družino Rdečega križa in Mednarodno organizacijo za migracije ureja okvirni sporazum o partnerstvu za mednarodne organizacije; opozarja, da se v obeh primerih proračun izvršuje s skupnim upravljanjem;
Notes that relations between ECHO and its UN partners are governed by the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement (FAFA), whereas relations with the Red Cross family and the International Organisation for Migration are governed by the FPA with International Organisations (IOs); recalls that in both cases the method used for budget implementation has been joint management;
poudarja, da so se pri pogojih in izvrševanju kontrol in nadaljnjega spremljanja sredstev EU v okviru skupnega upravljanja pokazale resne slabosti; poziva Komisijo, naj se zlasti z agencijami ZN dogovori o potrebnih ukrepih, da se bo mogoče opreti na revizije, ki jih izvedejo organi ZN, ter okrepi in izboljša zagotovila, pridobljena iz obstoječih pregledov, vključno s preverjanjem;
Points out that the terms for and the implementation of control and follow-up of EU funds under joint management have demonstrated serious weaknesses; urges the Commission to agree, notably with the UN agencies, on the measures required to be able to rely on the audit work carried out by UN bodies and to reinforce and enhance the assurance gained from the existing checks, including verifications;
poudarja, da morajo biti zahteve glede kontrol za posredno upravljanje sredstev EU enako stroge kot zahteve za skupno upravljanje; pričakuje, da bodo partnerji GD ECHO zagotavljali stopnjo odgovornosti za posredno upravljanje sredstev EU, ki ustreza stopnji, navedeni v členu 57(5) predloga Komisije za finančno uredbo; poudarja, da je dostop do revizijskih poročil partnerjev GD ECHO nujen za potrditev dobrega finančnega poslovodenja dejavnosti, ki se financirajo iz proračuna EU;
Stresses that the control requirements for indirect management of the EU funds must be as rigorous as those for shared management; insists that the same level of accountability be established for the indirect management of EU funds by ECHO partners as that indicated in Article 57(5) of the Commission proposal for the FR; stresses that access to the audit reports of ECHO partners is essential in verifying sound financial management of actions financed from the EU budget;
vztraja, naj se organu, pristojnemu za podelitev razrešnice, pravočasno zagotovi dostop do rezultatov revizije, brez poseganja v pooblastila in pristojnosti Evropskega računskega sodišča ali Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam;
Insists that audit results be made available in a timely fashion to the discharge authority, without prejudice to the ECA's or OLAF's powers and competences;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo poročila ZN vsebovala zadostne podatke o rezultatih, torej o izložkih in izidih, projektov v obdobju, ki ga poročilo obravnava; poudarja, da morajo biti merljivi kazalniki izložka in učinka sestavni del meril za poročanje; obžaluje dejstvo, da več kot 70 % odgovorov GD ECHO na vprašalnike Evropskega računskega sodišča za posebno poročilo št. 15/2009 razkriva, da so bila poročila ZN pozna, ter poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi trenutno stanje v zvezi s tem;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that UN reports contain sufficient information concerning the results – i.e. the output and outcome – of projects within the reporting time scale; stresses that measurable output and impact indicators must be an integral part of the reporting criteria; deplores the fact that over 70% of ECHO's replies to the ECA's questionnaires for its Special Report 15/2009 reveal that UN reports were late, and asks the Commission to indicate the latest situation in this regard;
poudarja, da obstajajo razlike med Komisijo in podpisnicami okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma glede razlage klavzule o preverjanju iz okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma, zlasti kar zadeva izvajanje pregledov; pozdravlja sprejetje standardnega obsega pooblastil za preverjanja v juliju 2009 za zagotavljanje dodatnih smernic za uporabo klavzule o preverjanju in njeno razlago; opozarja, da glede na zadnje ugotovitve sektorja za zunanjo revizijo GD ECHO ter Evropskega računskega sodišča v okviru letne izjave o zanesljivosti obstajajo možnosti za dodatno pojasnitev dogovorjenega standardnega obsega pooblastil in klavzule o preverjanju;
Points out that there are differences between the Commission and the FAFA signatories regarding the interpretation of the FAFA verification clause, particularly on the issue of conducting checks; welcomes the adoption of standard Terms of Reference (ToR) for verifications in July 2009 as a means of providing further guidance for, and clarification on, the operation of the verification clause; recalls that, according to the latest findings of DG ECHO's External Audit Sector (EAS) and the ECA within the framework of the annual DAS exercise, there is room for further clarification on the agreed ToR and the verification clause;
ugotavlja, da sektor za zunanjo revizijo ni imel večjih koristi od povečanja števila zaposlenih na sedežu GD ECHO leta 2010 (z 247 na 289);
Notes that the External Audit Service has hardly benefited at all from the increase in staff numbers at DG ECHO's headquarters in 2010 (from 247 to 289);
obžaluje težave Evropskega računskega sodišča pri dostopanju do informacij o dejavnostih, ki jih izvajajo partnerji iz ZN; opozarja, da v skladu s klavzulo o preverjanju iz okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma EU in posledično Evropsko računsko sodišče lahko izvajata finančne preglede na kraju samem ter da morajo ZN zagotoviti vse ustrezne finančne podatke; poudarja, da morajo ZN Evropskemu računskemu sodišču zagotoviti dostop do potrebnih informacij in tako izpolniti klavzulo o preverjanju iz okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma;
Deplores the difficulties the ECA has encountered in accessing information about the actions carried out by UN partners; recalls that, under the FAFA verification clause, the EU, and therefore the ECA, may carry out on-the-spot financial checks and that the UN is to provide all relevant financial information; stresses that the UN must provide the ECA with the necessary access to information and thus fulfil the FAFA verification clause;
pozdravlja pozitivne rezultate razprav s svetovnim programom za hrano in Skladom Združenih narodov za otroke (UNICEF), v skladu s katerimi sta spremenila svoja pravila in zagotovila dostopnost svojih poročil o notranji reviziji GD ECHO; poziva GD ECHO, naj podobna pogajanja nemudoma izvede tudi z drugimi agencijami ZN ter tako zagotovi preprost dostop brez birokratskih ovir do njihovih poročil o notranji reviziji; poziva Komisijo, naj pristojne odbore EP vsakih šest mesecev obvesti o napredku v pogajanjih; poudarja, da morajo biti vsa poročila o notranji reviziji Komisiji na voljo v elektronski obliki, in ne le v prostorih ustrezne agencije ZN;
Welcomes the positive results of the discussions with the World Food Programme (WFP) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), as a result of which the WFP and UNICEF changed their rules to make their internal audit reports available to DG ECHO; calls on DG ECHO to conduct similar negotiations with the other UN agencies without delay in order to ensure easy and unbureaucratic access to their internal audit reports; calls on the Commission to inform Parliament's competent committees on the progress of the negotiations on a six-monthly basis; stresses that all the internal audit reports should be made available to the Commission electronically and not only on the premises of the relevant UN agencies;
opozarja, da so se leta 2010 začele razprave s svetovnim programom za hrano z namenom dogovora o skupni metodologiji, v skladu s katero bi ta program izvajal revizije projektov, ki jih financira EU; poziva Komisijo, naj uspešno doseže ta cilj in podobna pogajanja izvede še z drugimi partnerji iz ZN;
Recalls that discussions started with the WFP in 2010 in order to agree on a common methodology under which the WFP would conduct audits of EU-funded projects; calls on the Commission to successfully complete this objective and to conduct similar negotiations with the other UN partners;
pozdravlja trenutna prizadevanja delovne skupine za odgovornost za pomoč ob nesrečah in njeno revidiranje, ki je bila ustanovljena v okviru Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucij (INTOSAI) in jo vodi član Evropskega računskega sodišča; opozarja, da sta glavna cilja naslednja: (i) določitev smernic in dobre prakse s končnim ciljem oblikovati enoten celovit model poročanja in (ii) vzpostavitev smernic in dobre prakse na področju revidiranja pomoči ob nesrečah;
Welcomes the current efforts of the Working Group on Accountability for and Audit of Disaster-Related Aid established in the framework of the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) and led by a Member of the European Court of Auditors; recalls that the two main objectives are: (i) establishing guidance and good practice with a view to ultimately arriving at a single integrated reporting model and (ii) establishing guidance and good practice in the area of disaster-related aid auditing;
meni, da je to pomemben korak naprej pri obravnavanju izzivov preglednosti in odgovornosti v sodelovanju z ZN in drugimi mednarodnimi organizacijami; spodbuja delovno skupino, naj izpolni svoja pooblastila v določenem časovnem okviru;
Is of the opinion that this is an important step forward in addressing the challenges of transparency and accountability in cooperation with the UN and other international organisations; encourages the working group to fulfil its mandate within the set time frame;
poudarja, da so od razkritja ob koncu leta 2006, da je vlada Severne Koreje zlorabila sredstva ZN za humanitarne in razvojne dejavnosti, številni kritizirali, da ZN skladov ne upravlja dovolj pregledno, odgovorno, učinkovitost in uspešno; obžaluje, da reforma ZN na področjih preglednosti in odgovornosti še ni prinesla pomembnega napredka; poudarja, da morajo države članice EU pokazati več politične volje, odločnosti in usklajenosti za napredek reforme in zagotavljanje večje odgovornosti; poziva visoko predstavnico Unije za zunanjo in varnostno politiko, naj to vprašanje obravnava prednostno in prevzame vlogo pobudnice;
Points out that, since the revelations of misuse of UN funds for humanitarian and development activities by the Government of North Korea in late 2006, there has been broad criticism regarding the lack of transparency, accountability, efficiency and effectiveness of the management of funds by the UN; regrets that the UN reform in matters of transparency and accountability has not yet made any significant progress; stresses that EU Member States need to demonstrate more political will, determination and coherence to advance the reform and ensure greater accountability; calls on the High Representative of the Union for Foreign and Security Policy to prioritise this issue and play a facilitating role;
Učinkovitost in uspešnost izvajanja humanitarne pomoči EU, ki jo upravlja GD ECHO
Efficiency and effectiveness of the implementation of EU humanitarian aid managed by DG ECHO
priznava koristi tega, da GD ECHO in njegovi partnerji iščejo nove načine financiranja; hkrati poziva k spoštovanju različnosti sodelujočih strani (Združeni narodi, Mednarodni rdeči križ in Rdeči polmesec, nevladne organizacije) pri financiranju in izvajanju evropskih humanitarnih programov, saj so nesreče pogosto nadnacionalne narave in je zato treba ukrepati večstransko in usklajeno; spodbuja prizadevanja za krepitev zmogljivosti lokalnih akterjev in povečanje zmožnosti uradov GD ECHO in strokovnjakov na kraju samem za ocenjevanje in hitro odzivanje na terenu;
Recognises the benefits of seeking new arrangements for the provision of funding by DG ECHO, together with its partners; calls at the same time for the diversity of the actors involved in financing and implementing the European humanitarian programmes – the United Nations, the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, NGOs – to be borne in mind, given that disasters often transcend national borders and require multilateral, coordinated responses; encourages the work being done to strengthen the capacities of local stakeholders and increase assessment and rapid response capabilities on the ground through DG ECHO's offices as well as field experts;