natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
priznava, da dosedanja sorazmerno nizka uporaba sedmega okvirnega programa v nekaterih državah članicah, pa tudi nezmanjšani razkorak med evropskimi regijami glede raziskovalne in inovacijske uspešnosti kljub prizadevanjem, da bi prek strukturnih skladov zmanjšali njihove zmogljivosti za raziskave in razvoj; je prepričan, da je treba izkoristiti potencial vseh regij za odličnost; zato meni, da so potrebni novi pristopi, s katerimi bi pomagali manj uspešnim regijam in državam članicam doseči odličnost in pametno regionalno specializacijo;
Acknowledges the relatively low participation in FP7 of certain Member States, as well as the persistence of a research and innovation performance gap between European regions, despite the efforts made via the Structural Funds to enhance their R&D capacity; is convinced that the potential for excellence of all regions needs to be harnessed; is therefore of the opinion that new approaches are necessary to assist underperforming regions and Member States to achieve excellence and smart regional specialisation;
poziva Komisijo, naj čimbolj poveča sinergijo med skupnim strateškim okvirom, strukturnimi skladi, Evropskim kmetijskim skladom, Evropskim skladom za razvoj podeželja in Evropskim skladom za ribištvo ter naj razvije pristop z več skladi, upoštevaje, da imajo različne cilje; je prepričan, da bi lahko kohezijski instrumenti krepili razvoj odličnosti in vzpostavljanje zmogljivosti zaradi večje skladnosti z raziskavami in inovacijami na regionalni ravni; meni, da bo to omogočilo razvoj poti k odličnosti in bo te regije popeljalo do polnega sodelovanja v skupnem strateškem okviru za raziskave in inovacije na osnovi kakovosti in odličnosti;
Calls on the Commission to maximise all relevant synergies between the CSF, the Structural Funds, the European Fund for Agriculture and Rural Development and the European Fisheries Fund and to develop a multi-fund approach, while respecting their different objectives; is convinced that cohesion instruments could strengthen the development of excellence and capacity building by a better compatibility with research and innovation policies at regional level; believes that this will allow a stairway of excellence to be developed, leading these regions to fully participate in the CSF, based on quality and excellence;
predlaga, da bi lahko novi pristop zajemal financiranje dejavnosti, namenjenih posodabljanju univerz, nakupu znanstvene opreme, lokalnemu prenosu tehnologije, podpiranju ustanavljanja in osamosvajanja podjetij, razširjanju rezultatov raziskovalnih-razvojnih in inovacijskih projektov, večjim zmogljivostim programov za mednacionalno usposabljanje raziskovalcev, ustanavljanju najsodobnejših raziskovalnih središč, vzpostavljanju mrež in grozdov odličnosti, strokovno preverjeno medregionalno sodelovanje na področju raziskav, razvoja in inovacij; je prepričan, da so se nekateri podporni ukrepi sedmega okvirnega programa izkazali za uspešne pri premostitvenih dejavnostih in bi jih bilo treba v skupnem strateškem okviru ohraniti;
Suggests that this new approach could include funding of activities aimed at: modernising universities, purchase of scientific equipment, local technology transfer, support to start-ups and spin-offs, dissemination of the results of R&D&I projects, increased programme capacity for trans-national researcher training, the foundation of cutting-edge research centres, the building up of networks of excellence and clusters, or peer-reviewed trans-regional collaborative R&D and innovation activities; believes that certain Support Actions of FP7 have proved successful as bridging activities and should be preserved in the CSF;
poziva države članice, naj razmislijo o financiranju Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta, programa Marie Curie ali projektov sodelovanja, ki sicer izpolnjujejo merilo odličnosti, vendar se jih zaradi pomanjkanja evropskih sredstev ne da financirati;
Calls on the Member States to consider funding ERC, Marie Curie or collaborative projects proposals that have met the criteria of excellence but cannot be funded owing to lack of European funds;
poudarja, da je treba ohraniti ustrezne instrumente, s katerimi bo mogoče podpreti razvoj institucionalnih zmogljivosti regij na področju raziskovalne in inovacijske politike, saj je regionalna raven strateška vez za učinkovito združevanje financiranja iz okvirnega programa s financiranjem iz strukturnih skladov ter tesno povezana z lokalnimi podjetji, storitvami ter raziskovalnimi in izobraževalnimi središči;
Highlights the importance of maintaining appropriate instruments with which to support the development of the institutional capacity of the regions with regard to research and innovation policy, since the regional level is a strategic link for effectively integrating FP funding with that of the Structural Funds and also in view of their strong links to local businesses, services and research and training centres;
poziva, da bi glede na prihodnjo usmeritev kohezijske politike v strategijo Evropa 2020 naložili obvezno prednostno nalogo glede inovacij v regijah , ki jih zajemata cilja 1 in 2, to pa se mora odražati tudi v dodeljevanju sredstev na vseh ravneh;
In the light of the future gearing of cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 Strategy, calls for the ‘innovation’ priority to be binding on both Objective 1 and Objective 2 regions, and for that priority to be reflected in the funding allocated at all levels;
meni, da bi morali lokalne in regionalne organe spodbujati k inovacijam, zlasti z nadaljevanjem in okrepitvijo izvajanja pobud, kot so „Regije znanja“, „Živi laboratoriji“ in „Pametna mesta“, v katerih prevladuje teritorialna razsežnost raziskav in razvoja;
Believes that local and regional authorities should be encouraged to innovate, notably via the continuation and strengthening of initiatives of the type ‘Regions of Knowledge’, ‘Living Labs’ and ‘Smart Cities’, in which the territorial dimension of Research and Development is fostered;
opozarja, da je pomembno ohraniti konvergenčne politike, ter poziva Komisijo, naj utrdi pot k odličnosti za tiste države članice in regije, ki so gospodarsko in socialno bolj ranljive ter v okvirnem programu premalo zastopane, na podlagi njihovih prednosti ter po učinkovitih in jasnih merilih, predvsem za znatno povečanje tamkajšnjega človeškega kapitala in raziskovalnih zmogljivosti;
Draws attention to the importance of maintaining convergence policies, and asks the Commission to build stairways to excellence for those Member States and regions that are economically and socially more vulnerable and are underrepresented in the FP, on the basis of their respective strengths and according to effective and clear criteria, aiming at substantially increasing their human capital and research capacity;
meni, da bi bil ustrezen instrument za razvoj evropskega raziskovalnega prostora objava razpisov za financiranje vrhunskih raziskovalnih centrov v prikrajšanih regijah; meni, da bi dodeljevanje pomoči v obliki razpisa povečalo dinamičnost in ustvarjalnost, kar lahko celo v strukturno šibkih regijah privede do uspešne izgradnje tehnoloških območij, ki bodo zagotavljala delovna mesta, usmerjena v prihodnost; meni, da bi morale v teh razpisih sodelovati skupine, ki bi vključevale po eno mednarodno priznano raziskovalno ustanovo in eno prikrajšano regijo in da bi bilo treba znanstvene pristope, na podlagi katerih bi zaprosili za financiranje, ocenjevati po načelu odličnosti; meni, da bi bilo obenem treba zahtevati izvedljivo celostno zasnovo, ki bi na primer s pomočjo strukturnih skladov in z vzpostavitvijo ustreznih okvirnih pogojev tvorila infrastrukturo in okolje, prikladno za raziskave in inovacije;
Takes the view that announcing a competition for the foundation of cutting-edge research centres in disadvantaged regions is a suitable instrument for developing the European Research Area; considers that the award of aid in the form of a competition boosts dynamism and creativity, which can lead even in structurally weak regions to the successful creation of research and technology sites providing future-oriented jobs; considers that the candidates for the competition should be teams comprising one internationally recognised research institute and one disadvantaged region each, and that the scientific approaches underlying the proposals for foundations should be assessed on the principle of excellence; considers that, at the same time, the region should be required to come up with a viable overall approach constructing, for example with the help of structural funds and by creating an appropriate framework, an infrastructure amenable to research and innovation;
priporoča, naj Komisija analizira možnosti za vzpostavitev vseevropskega skupnega sklada, ki bi se financiral iz strukturnih skladov in bi bil namenjen spodbujanju skupnih evropskih raziskav;
Recommends that the Commission analyse the possibility of setting up an all-European common fund financed by the Structural Funds to promote collaborative European research;
meni, da verodostojnost okvirnega programa temelji na znanstveni kakovosti, zato meni, da je glavno merilo za financiranje raziskav odličnost; opozarja, da se narava odličnosti razlikuje glede na vrsto udeleženca ali naravo raziskovalnega in inovacijskega projekta (merilo odličnosti za raziskovalno ustanovo ni enako kot za posameznega raziskovalca ali za mala in srednja podjetja, razlikuje se pa tudi med temeljnimi in uporabnimi projekti); poudarja, da bi morala biti pomembna merila za industrijo in aplikativne raziskave, kjer je to potrebno, tehnične izboljšave, inovacije, pilotni projekti in oblikovanje trga;
Is convinced that the credibility of the Framework Programme is based on scientific quality, and therefore considers excellence the main criterion for research funding; recalls that the nature of excellence differs with the type of participant or the very nature of the research and innovation project (the excellence criterion for a research institution is not the same as for an individual researcher or for an SME, and also differs between fundamental and applied projects); stresses that technical improvement, innovation, pilot projects and market creation should be considered important criteria for industrial and applied research, where relevant;
poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju in sinergiji med lokalnimi in regionalnimi, nacionalnimi in evropskimi čezmejnimi raziskovalnimi in inovacijskimi strategijami, pri čemer je treba spoštovati posebnosti različnih okolij, obenem pa povečati možnosti za dopolnjevanje in sodelovanje med njimi; je prepričan, da so za večjo učinkovitost financiranja in sofinanciranja poglavitni izmenjava informacij in najboljše prakse, skupna prizadevanja za načrtovanje programov, preprosta in prožna pravila in instrumenti, po potrebi pa tudi konvergenca;
Calls for better coordination and synergy between local and regional, national and European cross-border research and innovation strategies, respecting the specificities of the different contexts and, at the same time, reinforcing the possibilities for complementarities and cooperation between them; believes that access to and sharing of information and best practices, enhanced joint programming efforts, simple, flexible rules and instruments and, where appropriate, convergence of the latter is of key importance to increasing the effectiveness of funding, and possibly of co-funding;
je prepričan, da je Evropa dolžna uporabiti svoj veliki potencial na področju raziskav, tehnologije in inovacij ter prispevati k reševanju svetovnih družbenih izzivov, ki so:
Is convinced that Europe has an obligation to make use of its great potential in research, technology and innovation and to contribute to solutions to the global societal challenges, namely:
demografske spremembe v starajoči se evropski družbi, pa tudi starostne bolezni in družinska politika, naraščanje svetovnega prebivalstva, zapostavljene bolezni, prehrana in zanesljivost preskrbe s hrano, urbanizacija, mobilnost, družbena kohezija in migracije,
the demographic changes as an ageing society in Europe, including age related diseases and family policies, a growing world population, neglected diseases, nutrition/food security, urbanisation, mobility, social cohesion and migration,
prehod k trajnostnemu gospodarjenju z viri – trajnostno upravljanje voda, raba in upravljanje zemljišč, blaženje podnebnih sprememb, ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, morskih ekosistemov in gozdarstvo, obnovljivi viri energije in energetska učinkovitost, nujno potrebne surovine ter drugi biološki in fizični naravni viri,
the transition to sustainable management of scarce resources, including water, land use and soil management, mitigation of climate change, preservation of biodiversity, marine ecosystems and forestry, renewable energies, energy efficiency and energy security, critical raw materials and other biological and physical natural resources,
močna, stabilna in pravična gospodarska baza, gospodarsko okrevanje, izboljšanje izobraževanja in usposabljanja, okrepitev temeljnega in aplikativnega znanja v vseh strokah, od družbenih in humanističnih ved prek drugih področij, kot sta biologija in medicina ter raziskave civilne varnosti za državljane in infrastrukturo, do ključnih tehnologij, ki so potrebne za razcvet gospodarstva in zaposlovanja v EU;
a strong, stable and equitable economic base, including economic recovery, the enhancement of education and training and of fundamental and applied knowledge in all disciplines from social sciences and humanities, through other domains such as biological and medical sciences and research for the civil security of citizens and infrastructures, to key technologies in order to boost the EU's economy and employment;
poudarja, da je pomembno zagotoviti kontinuiteto uspešnih instrumentov med sedmim okvirnim programom in skupnim strateškim okvirom, zlasti v tistih programih sodelovanja; poziva Komisijo, naj v doglednem času oceni učinkovitost sedanjih instrumentov pri doseganju specifičnih ciljev politike, in naj tiste, ki so manj učinkoviti ali pri katerih ni zaznati vidnega prispevka, prilagodi;
Recalls the importance of ensuring the continuity of successful instruments between the FP and the CSF, in particular in the collaborative programmes; invites the Commission to assess in due course the effectiveness of existing instruments towards the achievement of specific policy goals and to adapt those of which the effectiveness or distinctive contribution is not clearly demonstrated;
poziva, naj se opravi neodvisna revizija – ki bi jo na primer opravilo Evropsko računsko sodišče v povezavi z nacionalnimi računskimi sodišči – o učinkovitosti javnih izdatkov za raziskave, ki jih izvajajo države članice, Evropska unija in lokalni organi;
Calls for an independent audit to be carried out, for example by the European Court of Auditors together with national courts of auditors, on the effectiveness of public expenditure on research undertaken by the Member States, the EU and local authorities;
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi prepoznavnost dodane vrednosti EU na področju raziskav in inovacij;
Calls on the Commission to strengthen the visibility of the EU added value in research and innovation;
poziva k usklajenim javnim in zasebnim prizadevanjem na evropski in nacionalni ravni za uresničitev cilja, da se za raziskave in razvoj namenijo 3 % BDP; poziva institucije EU in države članice, naj se nemudoma dogovorijo o natančnem načrtu za uresničitev tega cilja;
Calls for a concerted public and private effort at European and national level to reach the European target of 3 % of GDP on R&D expenditure; calls on the EU Institutions and the Member States to agree without further delay on a specific roadmap for achieving this target;
poudarja, da si je treba prizadevati, da bi bili izdatki v skupnem strateškem okviru kolikor mogoče skladni s splošnimi političnimi cilji strategije Evropa 2020; poziva k jasni uskladitvi novih pobud, kot so Unija inovacij in drugi pomembni vodilni projekti;
Stresses that efforts should be made to align spending within the CSF as far as possible with the overarching policy objectives under the Europe 2020 Strategy; calls for clear coordination with the new initiatives, such as the Innovation Union and other relevant Flagship Projects;
opozarja, da mora prihodnje financiranje raziskav in inovacij prispevati k cilju izoblikovanja evropskega raziskovalnega prostora z vzpostavljanjem sinergije in boljšim usklajevanjem različnih raziskovalno-razvojnih in inovacijskih politik in programov financiranja med EU, državami članicami in lokalnimi organi;
Recalls that the future funding of research and innovation should serve the goal of completing the ERA by creating more synergies and better cooperation between different R&D&I policies and funding programmes among the EU, Member States, and local authorities;
poudarja, da bi morala biti v jedru skupnega strateškega okvira ideja, da je treba različno naravo in obseg raziskovalnih, razvojnih in inovacijskih projektov ter raznovrstne sheme financiranja organizirati tako, da bo poskrbljeno za skladnost, široko reprezentativnost, povezanost, preprostost in komplementarnost, in na ta način tlakovati pot k odličnosti;
Underlines the fact that at the core of the CSF should be the idea that the differing nature and scale of R&D&I projects, together with the multiplicity of funding schemes, must be organised in such a way that coherence, broad representativeness, articulation, simplification and complementarity are ensured, building stairways to excellence;
ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba v upravnih pravilih skupnega strateškega okvira, ki urejajo pogodbene postopke, upoštevati različne nacionalne predpise glede univerz in raziskovalnih centrov; zlasti pa poudarja, da mehanizem sofinanciranja ne bi smel delovati na škodo univerz in raziskovalnih inštitutov ter v nobenem primeru ne sme potisniti univerz v slabši položaj, kot so drugi akterji;
Notes that, in order to allow all researchers to take part in CSF projects, administrative rules covering contracting procedures should take into account the different national rules on universities and research centres; stresses in particular that the co-financing mechanism should not operate to the detriment of universities and research institutes, and that under no circumstances should universities be placed at a disadvantage compared with other actors;
poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi preprost in dostopen sistem za pospeševanje inovacij, vlaganje v projekte raziskav, razvoja in inovacij za spoprijemanje z vélikimi družbenimi izzivi, in naj uporabi resnično celosten pristop, pozornost pa nameni različnim odločilnim fazam v inovacijski in vrednostni verigi (od dobavitelja materiala do končnega izdelka);
Calls on the Commission to set up a simple and accessible system to accelerate innovation, to invest in R&D&I projects on fighting the grand societal challenges and to have a truly holistic approach, focusing attention on the various crucial stages of the innovation and value chain (from material provider to end-user product);
je prepričan, da je treba različne naloge znotraj skupnega strateškega okvira obravnavati ločeno, vendar v tesnem medsebojnem odnosu: Evropski inštitut za inovacije in tehnologijo naj deluje predvsem kot mreža skupnosti znanja in inovacij, okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost pa naj se osredotoči na svojo prednost pri podpiranju inovativnih malih in srednjih podjetij; naslednji okvirni program naj obravnava raziskave kot celoto, strukturne sklade in kohezijski sklad pa je treba uporabiti bolj usmerjeno, vendar morajo ostati ločeni; meni, da bi morali projekti sodelovanja ostati hrbtenica skupnega strateškega okvira;
Is convinced that different tasks within the CSF should be tackled separately but in close articulation and partnership with each other: the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) to operate mainly as a network of Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs); the innovation-related parts of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) to concentrate on its strength in supporting innovative SMEs; the next FP to embrace research as a whole; and the structural/cohesion funds to be used in closer cooperation and in a more targeted way, but kept separate; takes the view that collaborative projects should remain the backbone of the CSF;
poudarja, da je treba povečati prožnost skupnega strateškega okvira, ne le zato, da bi bilo mogoče sredstva prerazporejati med različnimi poglavji in razpisi, temveč tudi, da bi bil dovolj prožen, da bi omogočal dodeljevanje sredstev za obvladovanje velikih družbenih izzivov, ki bi se pojavili med proračunskim obdobjem;
Stresses the need to enhance the flexibility of the common strategic framework, not only so that appropriations can be moved between the individual chapters and calls, but also so that the CSF is flexible enough to allow appropriations to be allocated to meet major societal challenges that arise during the budget period;
ta raven bi morala zajemati sredstva EU za infrastrukturo (v širšem smislu sem sodi tudi institucionalna infrastruktura) in gradnjo zmogljivosti;
This layer should cover the EU funds associated with infrastructure (in the wider sense, including the institutional one) and capacity building;
shema financiranja na tej ravni zajema del okvirnega programa za program Zmogljivosti in pobude Marie Curie, evropski del financiranja za raziskovalno infrastrukturo in projekte, dostop do posojil Evropske investicijske banke (ki krijejo projekte, večje od 50 milijonov EUR, in sklad za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja), nepovratna sredstva, povezana z zgoraj omenjenimi deli okvirnega programa, in sodelovanje s strukturnimi skladi za infrastrukturo;
The funding scheme within this layer includes the part of the FP concerned with the Capacities Programme and Marie Curie initiatives, the European funding components of research infrastructures and projects, access to loans by the EIB (covering projects over EUR 50 million and RSFF), grants associated with the abovementioned components of the FP, and cooperation with Structural Funds associated with infrastructure;
poziva k okrepitvi skupnega raziskovalnega središča kot notranjega dobavitelja znanstvenih in gospodarskih analiz za razvojne politike v skladu s strategijo Evropa 2020;
Calls for the role of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) as an internal supplier of scientific and economic analyses for development policy in line with the Europe 2020 strategy to be strengthened;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba prihodnje obsežne projekte (reaktor ITER, Galileo, globalni nadzor okolja in varnosti (GMES)) financirati zunaj okvirnega programa, in sicer z oblikovanjem posebnih proračunskih vrstic, s čimer bi zagotovili pregledno in zanesljivo strukturo financiranja, obenem pa jih obdržali pod nadzorom in omejili možnost prekoračenja stroškov; predlaga, naj se ti projekti deloma financirajo z izdajo projektnih obveznic Evropske investicijske banke;
Stresses that in the future large-scale European investment projects (ITER, Galileo, Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) should be funded outside the FP, creating autonomous budget lines for them, in order to guarantee a transparent and reliable financing structure whilst controlling and limiting their potential for cost over-runs; suggests that they should be partially funded through the issuing of project bonds by the EIB;
poudarja osrednjo vlogo obsežne raziskovalne infrastrukture za razvoj evropskega raziskovalnega prostora in poziva k splošnim sredstvom EU, ki bi se dala zbrati za raziskovalno infrastrukturo, zlasti kjer so dobre možnosti za evropsko dodano vrednost, da poziva, da bi se dalo financiranje podaljšati še v čas po pripravljalni fazi ter naj se zagotovi odprt dostop na podlagi odličnosti;
Highlights the pivotal role of large-scale research infrastructures for the development of the ERA and calls for the overall EU funding available for research infrastructures to be raised, especially where there is the greatest scope for European added value, for the funding to be extended after the preparatory phase and for open and excellence-based access to them to be guaranteed;