natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da rezultati javnega posvetovanja prav tako nakazujejo, da lahko poleg upravne obremenitve tudi drugi dejavniki nasprotujejo izvajanju pravil o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena: na primer negotovost in nesporazumi, zlasti glede odločilnih konceptov pravilih, kot so akt o pooblastitvi, primeren donos, podjetje, gospodarske in negospodarske storitve ter pomen za notranji trg;
Stresses that the outcome of the public consultation also indicates that, apart from the administrative burden, other factors possibly militating against the application of the rules on state aid to SGEI have been uncertainties and misinterpretations, especially of key concepts in the rules such as ‘act of entrustment’, ‘reasonable profit’, ‘undertaking’, ‘economic and non-economic services’ and ‘internal market relevance’;
pozdravlja namero Komisije, da bo natančneje pojasnila razliko med negospodarskimi in gospodarskimi dejavnostmi v okviru storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, da bi povečala splošno pravno varnost in preprečila posredovanje zadev Sodišču Evropske unije in odpiranje postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev s strani Komisije; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi nadaljnje pojasnitve glede četrtega merila, ki ga je Evropsko sodišče navedlo v sodbi Altmark in naj zagotovi, da bo metoda izračuna primernega donosa dovolj jasna in bo upoštevala raznolikost storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena; zato poziva Komisijo, naj se izogne izčrpnemu seznamu; meni, da se Komisija pri tem ne sme omejiti na ponavljanje sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije, ampak mora oblikovati določujoča merila kot pomoč pri razumevanju in uporabi konceptov; poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje svoje razumevanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena;
Welcomes the Commission's move to provide further clarifications on the distinction between non-economic and economic activities in the context of SGEI, in order to create greater overall legal certainty, and to avoid cases being brought before the European Court of Justice and infringement proceedings opened by the Commission; calls on the Commission to provide further clarification regarding the fourth criterion which the European Court of Justice stated in the Altmark judgment and to ensure that the method of calculation of reasonable profit is clear enough and appropriate to the diversity of SGEI; calls on the Commission, therefore, to avoid a closed list; suggests that, in doing so, the Commission should not confine itself to reiterating the case law of the European Court of Justice but should provide determining criteria to help understand and apply the concepts used; asks the Commission to elaborate its understanding of a genuine SGEI;
je zaskrbljen nad dodatnimi zahtevami, ki jih želi uvesti Komisija, da bi preprečila vpliv na razvoj trgovine v nasprotju z interesi Unije in je prepričan, da bo to imelo za posledico pravno negotovost;
Is concerned about the additional requirements that the Commission wants to introduce in order to ensure that the development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the interests of the Union, and believes that these will result in legal uncertainty;
poudarja, da „akt o pooblastitvi“ zagotavlja preglednost, ki jo je treba ohraniti, da bi povečali prepoznavnost za državljane, vendar je treba razširiti obseg dodeljevanja pooblastil (akt o pooblastitvi), predvsem s prožnejšim izvajanjem pravil; zahteva, naj se projekt, ki ga spremlja „pogodba o ciljih“, šteje kot ustrezen akt o pooblastitvi;
Stresses that the ‘act of entrustment’ is a guarantee of transparency which must be retained in order to give more visibility for citizens but that the scope for mandating (act of entrustment) should be enhanced, in particular by means of the more flexible application of the rules; calls for a project accompanied by a ‘contract of objectives’ to be considered as an eligible act of entrustment;
poudarja, da je mogoče pravila EU o državni pomoči preoblikovati samo ob upoštevanju posebne vloge storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena in doslednem upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti, saj so države članice in njihovi nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi po Protokolu št. 26 k Lizbonski pogodbi v prvi vrsti pristojni, da naročijo, zagotovijo, financirajo in organizirajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, pri čemer pa imajo široko polje proste presoje in izbire;
Stresses that any reform of the EU state aid rules must take into account the special function of SGEI and must adhere strictly to the principle of subsidiarity, as the primary responsibility for commissioning, providing, financing and organising SGEI, in accordance with Protocol No 26 TFEU, rests with the Member States and their national, regional and local authorities, which have wide discretion in that regard and freedom of choice;
poudarja, da je treba pri preoblikovanju pravil posebno pozornost nameniti zagotavljanju, da so uporabljeni koncepti in izrazi Skupnosti jasno prilagojeni naravi javnih storitev in raznolikosti organizacijskih oblik in udeleženih akterjev ter da upoštevajo dejansko tveganje vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami;
Stresses that particular attention must be paid, when reviewing the rules, to ensuring that the Community concepts and terms used are clearly tailored to the nature of public services and the diversity of forms of organisation and stakeholders involved, and that they take proper account of the actual risk of an impact on trade between Member States;
opozarja na posebnosti storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena na regionalni in lokalni ravni, ki ne vplivajo na konkurenco na notranjem trgu in za katera bi bilo treba predvideti poenostavljen in pregleden postopek, ki bo omogočil inovacije ter sodelovanje malih in srednjih podjetij;
Highlights the specific nature of SGEI at regional and local level, which does not affect competition in the internal market and where a simplified and transparent procedure should be possible that encourages innovation and the participation of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);
podpira koncept pragov, pri katerih za državna nadomestila za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena ni potrebna priglasitev, in s tem povezano zmanjšanje upravnih bremen; na podlagi izidov posvetovanj predlaga povišanje pragov, ki vplivajo na izvajanje odločbe SSGP;
Supports the concept of thresholds for exemption from the requirement of notification of state compensatory payments for SGEI, with the associated lessening of the administrative burden; suggests, on the basis of the consultations carried out, that the thresholds which determine the application of the SGEI Decision should be raised;
poudarja, da je posebna narava storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena priznana v členu 14 PDEU in Protokolu št. 26 k Lizbonski pogodbi, in v zvezi s tem priznava bistveno vlogo nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih organov; poudarja, da je preoblikovanje pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena le del potrebne pojasnitve pravnih določb, ki veljajo za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, v okviru evropskega skladnega pravnega okvira; se seznanja, da bo moral vsak pravni instrument zagotoviti zadovoljivo pravno varnost; poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2011 predloži sporočilo z ukrepi, s katerimi se bo za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena in storitve splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti zagotovil okvir, v okviru katerega se bodo lahko izvajale zadevne naloge, kot je bilo to storjeno v Aktu za enotni trg;
Stresses that the specific nature of SGEIs is recognised in Article 14 TFEU and Protocol 26 annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon, and recognises the special role of national, regional and local authorities in this connection; stresses that reform of the EU rules on state aid for SGEI is only part of the necessary clarification of the legal provisions which apply to SGEI through a European consistent legal framework; notes that any legal instrument will have to ensure satisfactory legal certainty; calls on the Commission to bring forward by the end of 2011 a communication with measures designed to ensure that SGEI and SSGI have a framework enabling them to perform their tasks, as it undertook to do in the Single Market Act;
poudarja, da v skladu s členom 106(2) za podjetja, pooblaščena za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, veljajo določbe o prepovedi in nadzoru državne pomoči samo, če uporaba takšnih pravil pravno ali dejansko ne ovira izvajanja posebnih nalog, ki so jim jih dodelili nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni organi; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da člen 14 PDEU jasno določa, da Unija in države članice v mejah svojih pristojnosti na področju uporabe pogodb skrbijo za to, da službe splošnega gospodarskega pomena delujejo na podlagi načel in pogojev, ki jim omogočajo izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog; zato poziva, naj se pri preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči upoštevata oba člena in zagotovi, da nadomestila, dodeljena za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ne privedejo do pretirane obremenitve za javne finance ali slabe kakovosti zagotovljenih storitev;
Emphasises that, under Article 106(2) TFEU, undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general interest are subject to the rules prohibiting and controlling state aid only in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them by national, regional or local authorities; highlights, in this regard, the clear stipulation in Article 14 TFEU that the Union and the Member States, each within their respective powers and within the scope of application of the Treaty, shall take care that such services operate on the basis of principles and conditions to enable them to fulfil their mission; calls therefore for the reform of the EU state aid rules to take account of both these articles and to ensure that compensation granted to SGEI does not come with an excessive burden for public finances or low quality of the services provided;
meni, da bi prihodnji predlog Komisije o projektnih obveznicah EU 2020 lahko bil in mora biti pomemben generator razvoja storitev splošnega pomena v državah članicah in na ravni Evropske unije; poudarja, da je treba postopke, ki so vzpostavljeni v ta namen, izrecno opredeliti v okviru za upravičenost projektov, ki ga je treba določiti po običajnem zakonodajnem postopku;
Deems that the forthcoming Commission proposal on EU 2020 Project Bonds could and should be a major vector for the development of services of general interest in the Member States as well as at EU level; underlines that procedures established with that purpose should be explicitly laid down in a project eligibility framework to be defined following the ordinary legislative procedure;
meni, da je izredno pomembno, da plačil nadomestil za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena ne izkrivljajo konkurence ali škodijo drugim nesubvencioniranim podjetjem, ki delujejo v istih sektorjih ali na istih trgih;
Considers it extremely important that compensation payments to SGEI do not distort competition or harm other non-compensated companies operating in the same sectors or markets;
poudarja, da dostop do nadomestil za neto stroške, ki jih imajo z izvajanjem javnih storitev zanje pooblaščena podjetja, sodi med ekonomske in finančne pogoje, potrebne za dobro izpolnjevanje nalog, ki so jim jih naložili javni organi, kar velja še toliko bolj v času sedanje krize, v kateri imajo javne storitve bistveno vlogo avtomatičnega stabilizatorja in zaščitnika najbolj ranljivih evropskih državljanov, s čimer pomagajo blažiti socialne posledice krize;
Points out that access to compensation for the net cost of delivering public services is among the economic and financial conditions necessary for undertakings entrusted with the operation of public services to perform properly the particular tasks assigned to them by public authorities, especially in these times of crisis, in which public services are playing a vital role as an automatic stabiliser, protecting the most vulnerable sections of the public and thus helping to mitigate the social impact of the crisis;
želi v tem okviru poudariti, da ima razvoj javno-javnega sodelovanja s skupno uporabo sredstev velike možnosti za povečanje učinkovitosti rabe javnih sredstev in posodobitev javnih storitev v odziv na nove potrebe državljanov na lokalnih območjih; poudarja tudi pomen čezmejnega sodelovanja;
Would emphasise here that the development of public-public cooperation, by pooling resources, offers great potential for increasing efficiency in the use of public resources and modernising public services to meet the new needs of people in their local areas; also emphasises the importance of cross-border cooperation;
izrecno poudarja, da morajo biti javne storitve zelo kakovostne in dostopne vsem slojem prebivalstva; je v zvezi s tem zaskrbljen zaradi restriktivnosti Evropske komisije, ki državno pomoč družbam za gradnjo socialnih stanovanj obravnava kot pomoč za storitve splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti samo, če se te storitve zagotavljajo izključno prikrajšanim državljanom ali socialno šibkim skupinam, saj tako ozko razumevanje pojmov spodkopava prednostni cilj socialne raznolikosti in univerzalnega dostopa;
Asserts emphatically that public services must be of high quality and accessible to all sections of the population; views with concern, in this regard, the restrictive stance taken by the Commission, which, in relation to state aid for social housing associations, classifies the services provided by such associations as SSGI only if they are reserved for socially disadvantaged persons or groups, this restrictive interpretation being at odds with the higher goal of fostering an appropriate social mix and universal access;
meni, da kakovostne storitve temeljijo na človekovih pravicah evropskih državljanov in da je treba okrepiti pristop, ki temelji na pravicah;
Is of the opinion that good-quality services are based on the human rights of European citizens; and that this rights-based approach should be strengthened;
opozarja, da je potrebno precejšnje vlaganje v nadgradnjo infrastrukture, zlasti v regijah, kjer ga je najmanj, ter predvsem na področju energije, telekomunikacij in javnega transporta, da bi omogočili zagotavljanje pametne energije ali širokopasovnih storitev v prihodnosti;
Recalls the substantial investment needed to upgrade infrastructure, especially in the regions where it is most lacking and in particular in the areas of energy, telecommunications and public transport, in order to enable the provision of future smart energy or broadband services;
poziva Komisijo, naj vlaganja v infrastrukturo, potrebno za izvajanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, vključi med stroške, ki jih krije nadomestilo; opominja Komisijo, da zagotavljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena včasih temelji na javni pomoči za dolgoročne naložbe kot pa na letnih plačilih nadomestil;
Calls on the Commission to include investment costs for infrastructure necessary to the functioning of SGEI within the costs that compensatory payments may cover; reminds the Commission that the provision of SGEI is sometimes based on long-term public investment aid rather than on annual compensation payments;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri pogajanjih o dvostranskih trgovinskih sporazumih sprejme izvajanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena in socialnih storitev splošnega pomena v partnerskih državah s strani javnega sektorja;
Calls on the Commission, when negotiating bilateral trade agreements, to accept the public-sector provisions of SGEI and SSGI in partner countries;
pozdravlja namero Komisije, da bo v okviru zelo raznovrstnega pristopa tako poenostavila izvajanje pravil o državni pomoči, da bodo upravna bremena organov in izvajalcev storitev sorazmerna z morebitnim učinkom ukrepa na konkurenčnost na notranjem trgu;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to ensure, through a more diverse approach to the application of state aid rules, that the administrative burden placed on the public authorities and on service providers is proportionate to the potential impact of the measure concerned on competition in the internal market;
zato poziva k oblikovanju določb na način, ki bo zagotovil njihovo pravilno uporabo in preprečil nepotrebno obremenitev javnih organov in podjetij, ki jim je bilo zaupano opravljanje storitev splošnega interesa, in jim omogočil opravljanje posebnih nalog v celoti; s tem v zvezi poziva Komisijo, naj olajša razumevanje pravil in predvidi obveznosti glede javnih plačil nadomestil za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena in tako zagotovi večjo pravno varnost za javne organe in ponudnike storitev;
Calls therefore for the provisions to be framed in such a way as to ensure that they can be applied correctly and that they place no unnecessary burden on the public authorities and the undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general interest, enabling them to perform in full the specific tasks assigned to them; asks the Commission in that context to make it easier to understand the rules and foresee the obligations regarding public compensation payments for SGEI and thus attain greater legal certainty for public authorities and service providers;
poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru napovedane poenostavitve pravil o državni pomoči oblikuje prožnejšo in preglednejšo ureditev za nadzor prekomernih nadomestil, zlasti naj izboljša ukrepe za preprečevanje prekomernih nadomestil; v ta namen predlaga, da se kontrole prekomernih nadomestil v primeru večletnih pogodb izvedejo samo ob koncu pogodbenega obdobja in v vsakem primeru v časovnih presledkih, ki niso daljši od treh let, in da je treba za izračun plačil nadomestil za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena določiti pregledna merila, saj bi to bistveno prispevalo k prihranku časa in denarja tako za ponudnike storitev kot tudi za javne organe;
Calls on the Commission, as part of the intended simplification of the state aid rules, to introduce greater flexibility and transparency in the monitoring of over-compensation and in particular to improve measures to prevent over-compensation; suggests, to this end, that, in the case of multiannual contracts, checks for over-compensation should be carried out only at the end of the contractual period and in any event at intervals of no more than three years and that transparent criteria should be set for the calculation of compensation payments for SGEI, as this would result in significant time and cost savings for both service providers and the public authorities;
poziva Komisijo, naj se pri javnih organih in operaterjih prepriča, ali Priročnik za uporabo pravil Evropske unije o državnih pomočeh, javnih naročilih in notranjem trgu pri storitvah splošnega gospodarskega pomena, zlasti storitvah splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti z dne 7. decembra 2010 učinkovito izpolnjuje svoj namen; poziva Komisijo, naj po potrebi javnim organom in operaterjem zagotovi pripomoček za učenje, s pomočjo katerega bodo lahko pravilno izvajali ta pravila;
Calls on the Commission to ascertain from the public authorities and operators whether the ‘Guide to the application of the European Union rules on state aid, public procurement and the internal market to services of general economic interest, and in particular to social services of general interest’ of 7 December 2010 effectively fulfils its purpose; asks the Commission, should it prove necessary, to provide the public authorities and operators with a learning tool to guide them towards the proper application of these rules;
poziva Komisijo, naj poenostavi pravila za izdajanje pooblastil; poziva, naj razpis za projekt skupaj s pogodbo o ciljih velja kot akt o pooblastitvi;
Calls on the Commission to simplify the rules for mandating; asks that a call for proposals accompanied by a target-based contract be deemed to constitute a mandate;
Storitve na področju socialne varnosti
Social services
poziva Komisijo, naj za storitve splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti, ki naj ne bi bistveno vplivale na poslovanje med državami članicami, uvede posebna področna pravila de minimis; zato predlaga, da bi za tovrstne storitve na področju socialne varnosti določili primerne višje pragove;
Calls on the Commission to come up with special de minimis arrangements for SSGI that can be assumed to entail no substantial detriment to trade between Member States; suggests, to this end, that appropriate higher thresholds be proposed for social services of this type;
podpira ohranitev obstoječega odstopanja brez pragov za bolnišnice in socialne ustanove; pozdravlja napoved Komisije, da želi od obveznosti priglasitve izvzeti še več storitev splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo plačila nadomestil za vse storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena zadovoljevale bistvene socialne potrebe, kot so opredelile države članice, kot je skrb za starejše in invalide, skrb in socialno vključevanje ranljivih skupin, oskrba otrok in mladine, zdravstvena oskrba in dostop do trga dela so izvzeti iz zahteve za obvestilo;
Supports the retention of the existing exemption without thresholds for hospitals and social housing; welcomes the Commission's assertion that it wishes to exempt further categories of SSGI from the requirement that aid to them be the subject of notification; calls on the Commission to ensure that compensation payments for all SGEI meeting essential social needs as defined by Member States, such as care of the elderly and of people with disabilities, the care and social inclusion of vulnerable groups, child and youth welfare, healthcare and access to the labour market are exempted from the requirement of notification;
meni, da bi morali varovati in jasno opredeliti posebno vlogo in naravo storitev splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti; zato poziva Komisijo, naj oceni, kaj naj bi bil najbolj učinkovit način za doseganje teh ciljev, ob upoštevanju možnosti pravil za posamezne sektorje;
Considers that the special remit and character of SSGI should be protected and clearly defined; calls on the Commission, therefore, to assess what would be the most effective way of attaining this objective, taking into account the possibility of sector-specific rules;
pozdravlja pristop Komisije k državni pomoči, da bi za podjetja, pooblaščena za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, uvedli pravilo de minimis, če se na podlagi lokalno omejenega področja delovanja pričakujejo samo zanemarljivi učinki na poslovanje med državami članicami in se zagotovi, da bo nadomestilo uporabljeno samo za zagotavljanje zadevnih storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni, ali bi morali tudi storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena na področju kulture in izobraževanja vključiti v posebno področno ureditev;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to introduce a ‘de minimis’ rule in respect of state aid to undertakings entrusted with the operation of SGEI where the locally limited scale of the activity means that only a negligible impact on trade between Member States is likely and where it is ensured that the compensation is used exclusively for the operation of the SGEI in question; asks the Commission to assess whether SGEI in the field of culture and education should also be the subject of a special arrangement;