natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je treba kljub različnim izkušnjam s terorizmom, pa tudi ravnjo ogroženosti med državami članicami imeti skupen evropski pristop, saj teroristične operacije pogosto zajamejo vso Evropo, teroristi pa pri svoji dejavnosti izkoriščajo različnost evropskih zakonov, različne zmožnosti za boj proti terorizmu in odpravo mejnih kontrol;
whereas although experiences of terrorism, as well as threat levels, vary across the EU Member States, a common EU approach is needed since terrorist operations are often pan-European and terrorists make use of European diversity in laws and anti-terrorism capabilities and the abolition of border controls when committing their acts;
ker državljani EU in druge osebe prav tako želijo, da bi bili njihova varnost in zaščita v EU in drugod zagotovljeni, ter ima EU v zvezi s tem pomembno vlogo;
whereas EU citizens and other persons also want their safety and security guaranteed within the EU and elsewhere and the EU has an important role to play in this regard;
ker teroristična dejanja resno ogrožajo človekove pravice in demokracijo ter je njihov namen omajati legitimno imenovane vlade, spodkopati pluralistične civilne družbe in ogroziti ideal vseh, to je živeti življenje brez strahu;
whereas terrorist acts seriously jeopardise human rights, threaten democracy, aim to destabilise legitimately constituted governments, undermine pluralistic civil societies and challenge everyone's ideal of leading a life free from fear;
ker bi moral biti namen protiterorističnih politik, da se borijo proti ciljem terorizma in izvrševanju terorističnih dejanj, katerih namen je, da uničijo strukturo naših svobodnih, odprtih in demokratičnih družb; ker morajo biti glavni cilji protiteroristične politike zaščita in okrepitev strukture demokratične družbe z okrepitvijo državljanskih svoboščin in demokratičnega nadzora, zagotavljanjem zaščite in varnosti evropskih državljanov, identifikacijo in preganjanjem subjektov, odgovornih za terorizem, ter z odzivom na posledice terorizma s pomočjo politike vključevanja, čezmejnega pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja ter učinkovite in usklajene strategije na ravni EU; ker je njeno uspešnost treba izmeriti glede na izpolnjevanje teh ciljev; in ker je najuspešnejši način boja proti terorizmu osredotočanje na preprečevanje nasilnega ekstremizma in stopnjevanja nasilja;
whereas the aim of counter-terrorism policies should be to combat the objectives of terrorism and the execution of terrorist acts, which seek to destroy the fabric of free, open and democratic societies; whereas the prime objective of counter-terrorism must be to protect and strengthen that fabric of democratic societies by strengthening civil liberties and democratic scrutiny, by ensuring the security and safety of European citizens, by identifying the parties responsible for perpetrating terrorism and prosecuting them, and by responding to the consequences of a terrorist attack through inclusion policies, cross-border judicial and police cooperation and an effective and coordinated strategy at EU level; whereas the effectiveness of counter-terrorism policies must be measured against these aims; and whereas the counter-terrorism approach most likely to succeed is that of focusing on prevention of violent extremism and escalation;
ker strategija Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu ne sme obravnavati le posledic terorizma, temveč tudi njegove vzroke;
whereas the European Union's counter-terrorism strategy should therefore address not only the consequences of terrorism but also its causes;
ker je boj proti nasilnemu ekstremizmu eden od bistvenih dejavnikov preprečevanja in odprave terorizma;
whereas the fight against violent extremism is an essential element in the prevention and suppression of terrorism;
ker pomeni boj proti terorizmu boj proti vsem oblikam terorizma, vključno s kibernetskim terorizmom in terorizmom, povezanim s trgovino z drogami, proti povezanosti terorističnih skupin s številnimi kriminalnimi operacijami in znotraj njih ter proti taktikam, ki jih uporabljajo za delovanje, kot so nezakonito financiranje, finančno izsiljevanje, pranje denarja in prikrivanje skupinskih terorističnih operacij s pomočjo lažnih pravnih oseb ali institucij;
whereas counter-terrorism means countering all forms of terrorism, including cyber-terrorism, narco-terrorism and the interconnectability of terrorist groups with and within multiple criminal operations, as well as the tactics it uses to be operational such as illegal funding, financial extortion, money laundering and disguising terrorist groups operations under assumed legal entities or institutions;
ker je terorizem državni problem in je zato naloga demokratičnih institucij, da ob iskanju najširšega političnega in družbenega konsenza pripravijo in ohranijo glavne značilnosti protiteroristične politike; ker je demokratični boj proti terorizmu, neizogibno v okviru ustavne in pravne države, stvar vseh političnih strank, ki so zastopane v demokratičnih institucijah, ne glede na to, ali so v vladi ali v opoziciji; in ker je zaradi tega priporočljivo ohraniti opredelitev protiteroristične politike, po kateri je ta v vsaki demokratični družbi v pristojnosti vlade, ki se oblikuje po zakonitem soočenju političnih strank in s tem po volilnem tekmovanju;
whereas terrorism is a State problem and it is therefore the task of democratic institutions to draw up and preserve the main lines of counter-terrorism policy in a search for the widest possible political and social consensus; whereas the democratic fight against terrorism, necessarily within the bounds of the constitutional state and the rule of law, is a matter for all the political parties represented in democratic institutions, whether they be in government or opposition; and whereas this makes it advisable to preserve the definition of the counter-terrorism policy, according to which it is in any democratic society a matter for governments, arising from the lawful confrontation between political parties and thus from electoral competition;
ker je razumno meriti stroške in koristi politike boja proti terorizmu, saj morajo snovalci politike vedeti, ali imajo njihove odločitve želeni uspeh, državljani pa imajo pravico, da izvoljene predstavnike pokličejo na odgovornost;
whereas it is reasonable to measure the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism policies, as policy-makers should know if their decisions are having the desired impact and citizens have a right to hold their elected representatives to account;
ker je deset let po napadih, ki so pretresli svet, čas, da preučimo dosežek, zabeležen v boju proti terorizmu; ker ovrednotenje omogoča bolj učinkovito in uspešno snovanje politike, za vsako moderno demokracijo pa morata biti značilna pogosto preučevanje in ocena političnih odločitev;
whereas ten years after the attacks that shook the world it is time to take stock of achievements in fighting terrorism; whereas evaluation allows for more efficient and effective policy-making and in any modern democracy policy decisions must be subject to frequent evaluation and review;
ker je bilo na področju politike boja proti terorizmu presenetljivo malo storjenega za oceno, do kolikšne mere je dosegla zadane cilje; ker je Parlament večkrat pozval k celoviti oceni politike EU za boj proti terorizmu, saj sta ovrednotenje in ocena predpogoja za preglednost in odgovornost snovalcev politike; in ker gre pomanjkanje ustrezne ocene politike EU za boj proti terorizmu v glavnem pripisati dejstvu, da se velik del te politike izvaja na področju obveščevalnih in varnostnih politik, za katere je že od nekdaj značilna tajnost;
whereas remarkably little has been done to assess to what degree EU counter-terrorism policies have achieved the stated objectives; whereas Parliament has repeatedly called for a thorough evaluation of EU counter-terrorism policies, as evaluation and assessment are preconditions for the transparency and accountability of policy-makers; and whereas the absence of proper evaluation of EU counter-terrorism policies is mainly due to the fact that a large part of it is conducted in the area of intelligence and security policies, where there is a tradition of secrecy;
ker je namen terorističnih napadov vsakič znova povzročiti masovne žrtve, s čimer se izzivajo razpoložljive institucionalne zmogljivosti;
whereas terrorist attacks have repeatedly aimed at causing mass causalities, challenging available institutional capacities;
ker so tarča teroristov nedolžni državljani, da se tako doseže cilj uničenja demokracije; ker imajo tisti, ki so bili poškodovani ali ki so izgubili bližnje v terorističnih napadih oziroma so bili v njih oškodovani, pravico do podpore, solidarnosti, odškodnine, nadomestila in pomoči;
whereas terrorists target innocent civilians in order to achieve their objective of destroying democracy; whereas those who have suffered injury, damage or loss of their loved ones in terrorist attacks are entitled to our support and solidarity, and to receive reparation, compensation and assistance;
ker je bistveno, da se zadosti pravici, da se sodi odgovornim in da se kaznujejo teroristična dejanja, in ker je treba posebno pozornost posvetiti položaju žrtev kot prič v sodnih postopkih;
whereas it is vital that justice be done, that the guilty ones are brought to trial and that terrorist crimes do not go unpunished, whereas the position of victims as witnesses in judicial proceedings needs special attention;
ker sta odgovornost in obveznost bistvena dejavnika demokratične legitimnosti protiterorističnih politik in ker je treba preiskati in sodno preganjati nezakonito delovanje, kršitve mednarodnega prava in prava človekovih pravic;
whereas accountability and responsibility are essential factors for the democratic legitimacy of counter-terrorism policies, whereas mistakes, unlawful actions and violations of international law and human rights law must be investigated and judicially prosecuted;
ker morajo protiteroristični ukrepi spoštovati pravice, ki jih določa Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, vsi ukrepi, sprejeti na tem področju, pa vplivajo na državljanske svoboščine;
whereas counter-terrorism measures must respect the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and any measure adopted in this field has a reciprocal impact on civil liberties;
ker je postala osrednja značilnost protiteroristične politike množičen nadzor, za preprečevanje terorizma pa se uporablja obsežno zbiranje osebnih podatkov, tehnologije za odkrivanje in prepoznavanje, zasledovanje in sledenje, odkrivanje zakonitosti v podatkih in profiliranje, ocenjevanje tveganja in analize vedenja ali podobne tehnike; ker ta sredstva prinašajo tveganje, da se bo dokazno breme prevalilo na državljane; ker sta stopnja učinkovitosti in uspeha teh instrumentov pri preprečevanju terorizma vprašljiva; in ker je izmenjava informacij med agencijami neustrezna;
whereas mass surveillance has become a key feature of counter-terrorism policies and whereas the large-scale collection of personal data, detection and identification technologies, tracking and tracing, data mining and profiling, risk assessment and behavioural analysis are all used for the purpose of preventing terrorism; whereas these instruments entail the risk of shifting the burden of proof to the citizen; whereas the effectiveness and success rates of these instruments for the prevention of terrorism are dubious; and whereas the sharing of information between agencies is inadequate;
ker javni organi vse pogosteje uporabljajo podatke, ki so bili zbrani v poslovne ali zasebne namene; ker so podjetja v različnih sektorjih dolžna hraniti osebne podatke o svojih strankah in jih posredovati; ker so stroški, povezani s hrambo in obnovo podatkov (tako naložbe v infrastrukturo kot operativni stroški), veliki;
whereas public authorities are making more and more use of data collected for commercial or private purposes; whereas private companies in various sectors are obliged to retain and provide personal data from their customer databases; whereas the costs connected with the storage and retrieval of data (both infrastructure investments and operational costs) are considerable;
ker je pereča potreba po enotni pravni opredelitvi pojma profiliranja, ki bi temeljila na ustreznih standardih o temeljnih pravicah in varstvu podatkov, s čimer bi se zmanjšala negotovost o tem, katere dejavnosti so prepovedane in katere niso;
whereas there is an urgent need for a uniform legal definition of the concept of ‘profiling’ based on the relevant fundamental rights and data protection standards in order to reduce uncertainty as to which activities are prohibited and which are not;
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije in opozarja, da mora biti povezano s prihodnjo strategijo notranje varnosti za Evropsko unijo; vendar obžaluje, da je njegovo področje uporabe dokaj ozko in omejeno na izvajanje dogovorjenih političnih ukrepov ter ne zajema nacionalnih protiterorističnih politik ali nacionalnih ukrepov za prenose politik, dogovorjenih na evropski ali mednarodni ravni, pa tudi dejstvo, da ni bilo temeljitejše preiskave morebitnih zakonskih vrzeli ali morebitnega prekrivanja ali podvajanja akcij in instrumentov za boj proti terorizmu, sprejetih na ravni EU; potrjuje pomen skladnega pristopa na ravni EU in držav članic pri pobudah, ki so sprejete na področju notranje varnosti, zlasti v zvezi s terorizmom in organiziranim kriminalom;
Welcomes the Commission Communication and reiterates that it must be linked to the EU's forthcoming internal security strategy; regrets, however, that its scope is rather narrow, is limited to the implementation of agreed policy measures and does not cover national counter-terrorism policies or national measures that transpose policies agreed at European or international level, as well as the fact that there has not been a more thorough investigation of possible legal loopholes or the possible overlapping or duplication of counter-terrorism actions and instruments adopted at EU level; stresses the importance of a consistent approach, at EU and Member State level, to initiatives adopted in the field of internal security, with particular reference to terrorism and organised crime;
obžaluje zamujeno priložnost, da bi pojasnili, kakšno vlogo igrajo v strategiji EU za boj proti terorizmu nekateri instrumenti EU za boj proti terorizmu, kot na primer hramba podatkov, evidenca podatkov o potnikih in sporazum Swift;
Regrets that the opportunity was missed to explain how certain EU counter-terrorism instruments such as data retention, PNR and the Swift Agreement fit into the EU counter-terrorism strategy;
meni, da bi Listina o temeljnih pravicah vedno morala biti usmerjevalnik za politiko EU na tem področju ter za izvrševanje te politike v državah članicah, pa tudi za sodelovanje s tretjimi stranmi in tretjimi državami;
Believes that the Charter of Fundamental Rights should always be the compass for EU policies in this field and for Member States in the implementation thereof, as well as in cooperation with third parties and third countries;
poudarja, da morajo Evropska unija, njene države članice in države partnerice svojo strategijo za boj proti mednarodnemu terorizmu osnovati na načelu pravne države in na spoštovanju temeljnih pravic; dalje poudarja, da morajo biti zunanji ukrepi Evropske unije za boj proti mednarodnemu terorizmu v prvi vrsti usmerjeni v preprečevanje, ter poudarja, da je potrebno spodbujati dialog, strpnost in razumevanje med različnimi kulturami, civilizacijami in religijami;
Emphasises the need for the European Union, its Member States and its partner countries to base their strategy for combating international terrorism on the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; underlines, furthermore, that the Union's external actions to combat international terrorism should in the first place be aimed at prevention, and highlights the need to promote dialogue, tolerance and understanding among different cultures, civilisations and religions;
ponovno poudarja, da bi morale protiteroristične politike spoštovati standarde v zvezi z nujnostjo, učinkovitostjo, sorazmernostjo, državljanskimi svoboščinami, pravno državo, demokratičnim nadzorom in odgovornostjo, za katere se je Unija zavezala, da jih bo spoštovala in spodbujala, ter da mora biti ocena izpolnjevanja teh standardov sestavni del ovrednotenja vseh protiterorističnih ukrepov EU; meni, da je treba te politike razviti v skladu z določbami primarne zakonodaje EU in da zlasti morajo dati prednost spoštovanju pravic, ki jih določa Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah;
Recalls that counter-terrorism policies should meet the standards set with regard to necessity, effectiveness, proportionality, civil liberties, the rule of law and democratic scrutiny and accountability that the Union has committed itself to uphold and develop, and that assessing whether these standards are met must be an integral part of an evaluation of all EU counter-terrorism efforts; considers that these policies must be developed in accordance with the provisions of EU primary law and, in particular, give priority to respecting the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
ponovno poudarja, da so lahko restriktivni ukrepi zaplembe, odvzema in zamrznitve sredstev in kapitala, povezanega s fizičnimi ali pravnimi osebami ali organizacijami, ki se ukvarjajo s terorističnimi dejavnostmi ali so vanje vpletene, koristna sredstva za boju proti terorizmu, vendar morajo biti v celoti skladni s členom 75 PDEU in Listino o temeljnih pravicah;
Reaffirms that restrictive measures to seize, confiscate or freeze assets and funds linked to natural or legal persons and organisations involved or implicated in terrorist acts, can be useful as a counter-terrorism tool, but that they must comply fully with Article 75 of the TFEU and the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
meni, da so preprečevanje, odkrivanje in pregon terorističnih dejavnosti ključne politike na ravni EU ter morajo biti del sistematičnega pristopa, ki ne bi temeljil na zasilnih predpisih, temveč na dosledni, na potrebi temelječi strategiji, ki bi bila namensko in stroškovno učinkovita ter ki bi se izogibala podvajanju ukrepov in oviranju delovanja pristojnih institucij, agencij in organov;
Considers that prevention, tracking and prosecution of terrorist activities are critical policies at EU level and must be part of a systematic approach based not on emergency norms but on a coherent, necessity-founded strategy, must be purpose- and cost-effective and must avoid duplication of measures and function creep on the part of competent institutions, agencies and bodies;
poudarja dejstvo, da bi morali biti rezultat ocene desetih let protiteroristične politike EU jasno opredeljeni politični cilji;
Underlines the fact that the evaluation of ten years of EU counter-terrorism policies should result in clearly defined policy objectives;
meni, da je terorizem pojav, ki se stalno spreminja, in da se je treba proti njemu boriti s protiteroristično politiko, ki bo te spremembe upoštevala;
Takes the view that terrorism is a phenomenon that is constantly evolving and should be met by a counter-terrorism policy that can address this fact;
meni, da je treba poglobiti in razviti štiri glavne vidike strategije za boj proti terorizmu: preprečevanje, zaščito, pregon in odzivanje;
Considers the decision to deepen and develop the four main strands of the counter-terrorism strategy – prevent, protect, pursue and respond – to be a good one;
meni, da bi morali preprečevanje, preiskovanje in preganjanje terorističnih dejavnosti temeljiti na okrepitvi pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja na ravni EU, skupaj s polnim parlamentarnim pregledom ter popolnim in pravočasnim dokončanjem načrta za sklop enotnih postopkovnih jamstev na visoki ravni;
Believes that prevention, investigation and prosecution of terrorist activities should be based on the reinforcement of judicial and police cooperation at EU level, coupled with full parliamentary scrutiny and full and timely completion of the roadmap for a high-level set of uniform procedural guarantees;
meni, da morata biti usposabljanje in večja ozaveščenost pravosodnih in policijskih organov prednostni nalogi, zato da se v Evropski uniji izboljša pripravljenost na področju boja proti terorizmu;
Considers that training and awareness-raising among judicial and police authorities must be a priority in order to improve readiness across the European Union in the fight against terrorism;
poudarja pomembnost sodelovanja držav članic z uradom OLAF ter drugimi agencijami EU, kot so Europol, Eurojust in CEPOL;
Points out in that regard the importance of cooperation by Member States with OLAF and with other EU agencies such as Europol, Eurojust and CEPOL;
poziva Komisijo, naj popolno oceni sklop sprejetih politik in ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu ter naj se osredotoči na prihodnje izzive, med katerimi so reforma Europola in Eurojusta ob upoštevanju novih možnosti, ki jih nudi Lizbonska pogodba, potreba po enotnih standardih za pridobivanje dokazov in vodenje preiskav, polna uporaba skupnih preiskovalnih enot, okrepljeni okvir EU za usposabljanje v pravosodju in policiji ter ustrezne politike vključevanja in povezovanja;
Invites the Commission to fully assess the set of counter-terrorism policies and measures adopted and focus on future challenges, including the reform of Europol and Eurojust in the light of the new potentialities offered by the Lisbon Treaty, the need for uniform standards for obtaining evidence and conducting investigations, full implementation of joint investigation teams, a stronger EU framework for judicial and police training, and proper inclusion and integration policies;
meni, da morajo biti protiteroristični ukrepi sorazmerni ravni ogroženosti in da se morajo prilagoditi tako njenemu povečanju kot njenemu zmanjšanju; ugotavlja, da morajo biti protiteroristični ukrepi, tako v obliki novih vladnih pooblastil kot tudi agencij, načrtovani tako, da jih je mogoče okrepiti ali zmanjšati, odvisno od situacije;
Takes the view that counter-terrorism measures must be commensurate with the threat level and that they must be adjusted in response to both an increase and a decrease in threat level; notes that counter-terrorism measures, in terms of both new government powers and agencies, must be designed in such a way that they can be scaled up as well as down, depending on the situation;
ponovno poudarja, da sta radikalizacija in novačenje največji in najbolj trajni dolgoročni grožnji, kakor je poudarila Komisija v svojem sporočilu, in sta zato os, na katero se morajo osredotočiti preventivne strategije EU za boj proti terorizmu že na začetku verige; poudarja, da je vlaganje v protirasistično in protidiskriminacijsko politiko ključno sredstvo za boj proti radikalizaciji in za njeno preprečevanje ter proti novačenju potencialnih teroristov;
Recalls that radicalisation and recruitment pose the most significant and continuous long-term threat, as stressed in the Commission's Communication, and thus constitute the axis on which the EU must focus its counter-terrorism prevention strategies at the very beginning of the chain; stresses that investment in anti-racism and anti-discrimination policies constitutes a crucial instrument with which to tackle and prevent radicalisation and recruitment of potential terrorists;
opozarja na pomemben prispevek mnogih nevladnih organizacij in civilne družbe, ki jih pogosto sofinancirajo EU in njene države članice, na področju družbeno-gospodarskega razvoja, izgradnje miru, državotvornosti in demokracije, ki so bistvenega pomena pri preprečevanju radikalizacije in novačenja;
Recalls the important contribution of many NGOs and civil society, often co-financed by the EU and its Member States, towards socio-economic development, peace building, nation building and democratisation, all essential in countering radicalisation and recruitment;