natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati specifična vprašanja s področja konkurence in da morajo instrumenti, ki bi veljali za kolektivne tožbe, v celoti in ustrezno upoštevati posebnosti protimonopolnega sektorja;
Believes that proper account should be taken of the specific issues arising in the competition field and that any instrument applicable to collective redress must take full and proper account of the specific nature of the antitrust sector;
skupina tožnikov mora biti pred vložitvijo tožbe natančno opredeljena (postopek opt-in);
the group of claimants must be clearly identified before the claim is brought (opt-in procedure);
v imenu jasno opredeljene skupine lahko tožbo vložijo javni organi, kot so varuh človekovih pravic ali tožilci, pa tudi predstavniški organi;
public authorities, such as ombudsmen or prosecutors, as well as representative bodies, may bring an action on behalf of a clearly identified group of claimants;
merila za opredelitev predstavniških organov, ki lahko vložijo tožbo, morajo biti opredeljena na ravni EU;
the criteria used to define the representative bodies qualified to bring representative actions need to be established at EU level;
sistem skupinskih tožb je treba zavrniti, saj bi pretirano spodbujal k pravdanju, utegnil bi biti v nasprotju z ustavo nekaterih držav članic in vplivati na pravice žrtev, ki bi v sodnem postopku sodelovale nevede, sodba sodišča pa bi bila zanje vseeno zavezujoča;
a class-action system must be rejected on the grounds that it would promote excessive litigation, may be contrary to some Member States' constitutions and may affect the rights of any victim who might participate in the procedure unknowingly whilst being bound by the court's decision;
dovoljene posamezne tožbe:
individual actions allowed:
tožniki morajo imeti v vsakem primeru možnost, da izkoristijo možnost alternativnega individualnega odškodninskega zahtevka pred pristojnim sodiščem;
claimants must in all circumstances be free to make use of the alternative of individual compensatory redress before a competent court;
kolektivni tožniki ne smejo biti v boljšem položaju kot individualni tožniki;
collective claimants must not be in a better position than individual claimants;
povrnitev manjše in razpršene škode:
compensation for minor and diffuse damages:
tožniki v zadevah manjših in razpršenih škod lahko ustrezno dostopajo do sodnega varstva prek kolektivnih tožb in si tako zagotovijo pravično odškodnino;
claimants seeking minor and diffuse damages should have appropriate means of access to justice through collective redress and should secure fair compensation;
odškodnina le za dejansko škodo:
compensation for actual damage only:
prizna se lahko le odškodnina za dejansko utrpljeno škodo: kaznovalne odškodnine in nepoštena obogatitev morajo biti prepovedane;
compensation may be awarded only for the actual damage sustained; punitive damages and unfair enrichment must be prohibited;
vsak tožnik mora svoj zahtevek podpreti z dokazi;
each claimant must provide evidence for his or her claim;
dodeljena odškodnina mora biti med posamezne žrtve porazdeljena sorazmerno s škodo, ki so jo utrpele;
the damages awarded must be distributed to individual claimants in proportion to the harm they sustained individually;
odvetniške nagrade, vezane na uspeh, v Evropi niso običajna praksa in jih je treba zavrniti;
by and large, contingency fees are unknown in Europe and must be rejected;
načelo „kdor izgubi, plača“:
loser-pays principle:
ne morejo se voditi postopki, če je tožnik zaradi pomanjkanja finančnih sredstev brez obrambe; poleg tega pravdne stroške in s tem procesno tveganje nosi stranka, ki izgubi; določitev predpisov za kritje stroškov je v pristojnosti držav članic;
no action may be brought if the claimant is defenceless as a result of a lack of financial means; moreover, the procedural costs, and hence the risk, involved in legal action are to be borne by the party which loses the case; it is a matter for the Member States to lay down rules on the allocation of costs in this context;
prepoved financiranja s strani tretjih oseb:
no third-party funding:
postopkov ne bi smele vnaprej financirati tretje osebe, na primer v zameno za odstopitev morebitnih kasnejših pravic tožnikov do odškodnine tretji osebi;
proceedings should not be pre-financed by third parties, in return, for example, for claimants agreeing to surrender to third parties possible subsequent entitlements to compensation;
poudarja, da morajo horizontalni okviri zagotavljati skladnost z dvema osnovnima domnevama:
Stresses that any horizontal framework must ensure compliance with two basic premises:
države članice ne bodo uporabljale strožjih pogojev za kolektivne tožbe zaradi kršitev prava EU od tistih, ki se uporabljajo za kršitve nacionalnega prava držav članic;
Member States will not apply more restrictive conditions to the collective redress cases arising out of the infringement of EU law than those applied to cases arising out of the infringement of national law;
nobeno od načel iz horizontalnega okvira ne preprečuje sprejetja dodatnih ukrepov za zagotovitev, da je pravo EU popolnoma učinkovito;
none of the principles laid out in the horizontal framework will prevent the adoption of further measures to ensure that EU law is fully effective;
pozdravlja zakonodajni instrument za odškodninske tožbe zaradi kršitev protimonopolnega prava, ki ga je Komisija napovedala v svojem delovnem programu za leto 2012; poudarja, da je treba pri tem instrumentu upoštevati prejšnje resolucije Parlamenta o tej temi in da ga je treba sprejeti z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom;
Welcomes the legislative instrument announced by the Commission in its 2012 Work Programme covering actions for damages for breaches of antitrust law; stresses that it should take account of earlier Parliament resolutions on the topic, and emphasises that it should be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure;
meni, da je politika nalaganja glob pomembno orodje za odvračanje in javno izvrševanje ;
Believes that the fining policy is an important tool for public enforcement and deterrence;
ugotavlja, da se da ustrezno ravnanje spodbosti tudi s spodbujanjem skladnosti, ne samo s kaznimi; zagovarja pristop, ki bo učinkovito odvračal, obenem pa spodbujal k skladnosti;
Notes that behaviours are motivated not only by penalties but also by encouraging compliance; favours an approach that serves as an effective deterrent while encouraging compliance;
poudarja, da se politika visokih kazni ne bi smela uporabljati kot alternativa mehanizmu financiranja proračuna EU;
Emphasises that a policy of high fines is not and should continue not to be used as an alternative EU-budget financing mechanism;
ugotavlja, da je metoda za določanje glob vsebovana v smernicah za določanje glob, ki so nezakonodajni instrument, in ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj vključi podrobno opredeljeno osnovo za izračun glob, skupaj z novimi načeli za njihovo določanje, v uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003;
Notes that the method for setting fines is contained in a non-legislative instrument - the 2006 Fining Guidelines - and urges once again the Commission to incorporate a detailed basis for calculating fines, along with new fining principles, into Regulation (EC) No 1/2003;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj pregleda svoje smernice za določanje glob, in predlaga, naj ovrednoti načela kot na primer:
Encourages the Commission to review its fining guidelines and suggests that it evaluate principles such as:
upoštevati bi bilo treba, da robustni programi skladnosti ne bi smeli imeti negativnih nesorazmernih posledic za kršitelja glede na popravo zadevne kršitve;
taking into account that the implementation of robust compliance programmes should not have negative implications for the infringer beyond what is a proportionate remedy to the infringement;
uvedbo različni ravni glob za podjetja glede na to, ali so ravnala namerno ali nenamerno;
introducing a distinction on the level of fines for undertakings who have acted intentionally or negligently;
upoštevati bi bilo treba medsebojno vplivanje javnih in zasebnih obveznosti po protimonopolni zakonodaji EU; Komisija bi morala zagotoviti, da bodo pri določitvi glob upoštevana vsa nadomestila, ki so bila tretjim stranem že izplačana; to bi moralo veljati tudi za podjetja, ki so zaprosila za prizanesljivost; poleg tega bi lahko kršitelje spodbudili, da bi nastalo škodo poravnali na zunajsodni osnovi, preden se sprejme končna odločitev;
taking into account the interaction between public and private liabilities under EU antitrust law; the Commission should make sure fines take into account any compensation already paid to third parties; this should be also applicable to undertakings benefiting from leniency; furthermore the infringer could be encouraged to pay damages on an out-of-court settlement basis before the final decision on the fine is taken;
pogoje, kdaj bi morala matična družba z odločujočim vplivom na podrejeno družbo, ki pa ni neposredno vpletena v kršitev, solidarno odgovarjati za protimonopolne kršitve svojih podrejenih družb;
specifying conditions under which parent companies who exercise decisive influence over a subsidiary but are not directly involved in an infringement should be made jointly and severally liable for antitrust infringements on the part of their subsidiaries;
zahtevo, da je treba, kar zadeva povratništvo, vzpostaviti jasno povezavo med kršitvijo, ki se preiskuje, in preteklimi kršitvami na eni strani ter podjetjem na drugi; upoštevati bi bilo treba najdaljši dovoljeni rok;
requiring, as regards recidivism, a clear connection between, on one hand, the infringement under investigation and past infringements and, on the other, the undertaking concerned; a maximum time-limit should be taken into consideration;
je seznanjen z naraščajočim številom zahtevkov za zmanjšanje globe zaradi nezmožnosti plačila, predvsem v primeru podjetij z enim proizvodom ter malih in srednjih podjetij; meni, da bi lahko kot alternativ zmanjšanju glob razmislili o sistemu odloženih in/ali deljenih plačil, da ne bi uničevali podjetij;
Notes that the number of requests for fine reduction on account of an inability to pay has increased, particularly from ‘mono-product’ undertakings and SMEs; deems that a system of delayed and/or split payments could be considered as an alternative to fine reduction in order to avoid putting undertakings out of business;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri analiziranju možnih zlorab prevladujočega položaja podrobneje preuči ekonomiko „curljanja navzdol“, če odkrije, da prevladujoči položaj ni bil zlorabljen;
Urges the Commission to take a closer look at trickle-down economics when analysing possible abuses of dominant positions, when it discovers that the dominant position has not been abused;
meni, da gospodarska in finančna kriza ne more biti opravičilo za milejše evropske politike glede nadzora nad združevanjem; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da združitve, še posebej tiste, ki so namenjene reševanju ali prestrukturiranju bank v težavah, ne bodo ustvarjale institucij, ki bi bile prevelike, da bi jih pustili propasti, in sistemskih institucij na splošno;
Believes that the economic and financial crisis cannot justify a relaxation of EU merger control policies; calls on the Commission to ensure that mergers, and in particular mergers designed to rescue or restructure ailing banks, do not create more ‘too big to fail’ and more generally systemic institutions;
poudarja, da je treba uporabo pravil konkurence za združitve ocenjevati z vidika celotnega notranjega trga;
Underlines that the application of competition rules to mergers must be evaluated from the perspective of the entire internal market;
poudarja, da je pomembno spodbujati svetovno približevanje ureditve konkurenčnih pravil; spodbuja Komisijo, naj dejavno sodeluje v Mednarodni mreži za konkurenco;
Highlights the importance of fostering the global convergence of competition regulation; encourages the Commission to participate actively in the International Competition Network;
Specifični sektorji
Specific sectors
je seznanjen s pobudo Komisije za energetsko učinkovitost za leto 2020; poziva jo, naj si prizadeva za popolno izvajanje svežnja o notranjem energetskem trgu; ker enotni energetski trg še ni v celoti odprt in konkurenčen, Komisijo spodbuja, naj dejavno spremlja konkurenco na energetskih trgih, zlasti kadar privatizacija javnih gospodarskih služb ustvari izhaja iz monopolnega ali oligopolnega trga;
Takes note of the Commission's Energy 2020 initiative; urges the Commission to pursue the full implementation of the internal energy market package; encourages the Commission, insofar as an open and competitive single market in energy has not yet been fully achieved, to actively monitor competition in energy markets, specifically whenever privatisation of public utilities originates in monopolistic or oligopolistic markets;
ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj v svojem naslednjem letnem poročilu preuči, koliko lahko koncentracija dobaviteljev nujno potrebnih surovin škodi dejavnosti odjemalskih sektorjev in večji ekološki učinkovitosti gospodarstva, saj so nekatere izredno pomembni za uveljavljanje ekološko učinkovite tehnologije, kot so fotonapetostni paneli in litij-ionske baterije;
Recalls its invitation to the Commission to examine in its next annual report the extent to which the concentration of critical raw materials suppliers may be harmful to the activity of client sectors and a more eco-efficient economy, since some of these are of paramount importance for the deployment of eco-efficient technologies such as photovoltaic panels and lithium-ion batteries;
, da se zagotovi kakovost bonitetnih ocen;
in order to ensure the quality of ratings;
poziva Komisijo, naj aktivno spremlja razvoj dogodkov na blagovnih trgih v skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta iz junija 2008 (odstavek 40) in naj skuša uveljaviti ambiciozne zakonodajne predloge v okviru revizije direktive o trgih finančnih instrumentov in direktive o tržni manipulaciji, da bi se spoprijela s špekulativnim ravnanjem, ki škodi evropski industriji in izkrivlja enotni trg;
Calls for the Commission to actively monitor developments in commodity-related markets following the conclusions of the European Council of June 2008 (paragraph 40) and to push forward ambitious legislative proposals within the revision of MiFID and MAD framework in order to tackle speculative practices which adversely affects European industry and generate distortion in the Single Market;
poudarja, da so nedavne preiskave, ki so jih izvedli ameriški, angleški in japonski regulativni organi, razkrile, da so se med krizo pojavili dokazi, da so ameriške in evropske banke prirejale obrestne mere LIBOR; je zato zaskrbljen zaradi možnega izkrivljanja na trgu, ki jih je ustvarilo tovrstno ravnanje;
Underlines that recent investigations carried out by US, UK and Japanese regulators have revealed that, during the crisis, evidence has emerged that US and European banks have manipulated LIBOR rates; is therefore concerned about potential market distortions generated by such practices;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj preuči stanje konkurence v maloprodajnem sektorju, zlasti posledice domnevne zlorabe tržne moči s strani prevladujočih maloprodajnih verig, kar utegne imeti negativne posledice za male trgovce na drobno in proizvajalce, in sicer na kmetijskem in živilskem trgu;
Encourages the Commission to investigate the competition situation in the retail sector, in particular the consequences of alleged abuse of market power by dominant retail chains with negative consequences for small retailers and producers, namely in the agriculture and food market;
ponavlja svoje zahteve, naj Komisija izvede preiskavo konkurence v agroživilski panogi, da preuči učinek tržne moči, ki jo imajo veliki dobavitelji in trgovci na drobno nad delovanjem tega trga;
Recalls its demands to the Commission to carry out a competition inquiry in the agro-food industry to investigate the effect of the market power that major suppliers and retailers hold on the functioning of that market;
je seznanjen s kompleksnostjo dobavne verige v prehrambeni industriji in s pomanjkanjem preglednosti pri cenah prehrambenih izdelkov; meni, da bo boljša analiza stroškov, procesov, dodane vrednosti, količin, cen in marž v vseh delih dobavne verige v prehrambeni industriji, obenem z večjo preglednostjo pri kakovosti, v skladu s konkurenčnim pravom in poslovno zaupnostjo povečala količino informacij, ki je na voljo potrošnikom, in preglednost mehanizmov za določanje cen v dobavni verigi v prehrambeni industriji, tako da bodo potrošniki imeli boljšo izbiro in se bodo lahko izognili nepravični diskriminaciji; pozdravlja ustanovitev foruma na visoki ravni za boljše delovanje verige preskrbe s hrano in njene pozitivne učinke pri izboljševanju trgovinskih praks;
Notes the complexity of the food supply chain and the lack of transparency in food pricing; believes that an improved analysis of costs, processes, added value, volumes, prices and margins across all sections of the food supply chain, including enhanced quality transparency, in line with competition law and commercial confidentiality, will enhance the information available to consumers and the transparency of price-setting mechanisms of the food supply chain, thereby improving choice for consumers and avoiding unfair consumer discrimination; welcomes the establishment of the High Level Forum for a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain and its positive effects on the improvement of trading practices;
ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj izvede sektorsko preiskavo spletnega oglaševanja in iskalnikov;
Reiterates its call on the Commission to conduct a sector inquiry into online advertising and search engines;
ponovno poziva k preiskavi uporabe pravil za javna naročila in ali razlike med državami vodijo v izkrivljanje konkurence;
Reiterates its call for an inquiry into the application of public procurement rules, and whether national differences lead to a distortion of competition;
poudarja, da mora še naprej ostati glavni cilj evropske prometne politike dokončanje notranjega trga za vse vrste prometa;
Stresses that the completion of the internal market for all transport modes needs to be and to remain the main goal of the European transport policy;
soglaša s Komisijo, da EU še vedno nima dovolj povezanega, medobratovalnega in učinkovitega čezmejnega omrežja prometne infrastrukture, kar je nujno za pošteno konkurenco v okviru dokončanja notranjega trga;
Shares the Commission's view that the EU still lacks a sufficiently interconnected, interoperable and efficient cross-border transport infrastructure network, which is indispensable for fair competition within the completion of the internal market;
meni, da bi morala politika konkurence prispevati k spodbujanju in uveljavljanju odprtih standardov in medobratovalnosti, s čimer bi preprečili, da bi manjšina udeležencev na trgu tehnološko navezala potrošnike in stranke samo nase;
Takes the view that competition policy should contribute to promoting and enforcing open standards and interoperability in order to prevent the technological lock-in of consumers and clients by a minority of market players;
je seznanjen s pomanjkanjem konkurence na trgu gostovanja v tujih omrežjih ter poudarja, da je potrebna večja preglednost cen; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja nova okvirna pravila EU za telekomunikacije in predlog Komisije za uredbo o gostovanju v tujih omrežjih III ( COM(2011)0402 ), v katerem predlaga strukturne ukrepe za izboljšanje konkurence na veleprodajni ravni s predvidenimi koristmi pri konkurenci na maloprodajni ravni, cenah in izbiri za potrošnike; Komisijo še posebej poziva, naj izpolni cilj iz svojega sporočila o digitalni agendi za Evropo ( COM(2010)0245 ), da je treba razlike med gostovanjem v tujih omrežjih in nacionalnimi tarifami do leta 2015 odpraviti;
Notes the lack of competition in the roaming market and stresses the need for improved price transparency; welcomes in this regard the new EU telecom framework rules and the Commission's proposal for a Roaming III Regulation ( COM(2011)0402 ) which proposes structural measures to improve wholesale competition, with expected benefits on retail competition, prices and choice for consumers; in particular, urges the Commission to meet the objective set in the Digital Agenda for Europe ( COM(2010)0245 /2) that differences between roaming and national tariffs should be eliminated by 2015;
poudarja, da je povečana konkurenca na področju širokopasovnega omrežja bistvena za uresničevanje cilja strategije Evropa 2020, in sicer polna pokritost za vse evropske državljane, kar bo koristilo potrošnikom in podjetjem; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možne primere, v katerih je dostop do storitev širokopasovnega omrežja na nacionalni ravni omejen;
Stresses that increased competition in the broadband sector is essential to achieve the Europe 2020 goal of full coverage for European citizens, bringing benefits to consumers and businesses; asks the Commission to look into possible cases where access to broadband services has been limited at national level;
poziva Komisijo, naj razišče, v kolikšni meri bi utegnilo preveč radodarno dodeljevanje prostih dovoljenj Evropske unije v nekaterih sektorjih izkrivljati konkurenco, saj so ta dovoljenja, katerih učinkovitost se je zaradi usihanja gospodarske aktivnosti zmanjšala, nekaterim podjetjem ustvarila nepričakovane dobičke, obenem pa zmanjšala spodbudo zanje, da bi odigrala svojo vlogo pri prehodu na ekološko učinkovito gospodarstvo;
Urges the Commission to examine the extent to which a too generous allocation of free European Union Allowances (EUA) permits in certain sectors may distort competition, given that these permits, whose efficiency has diminished since the slowdown of the activity, have generated windfall profits for certain companies while reducing their incentive to play their part in the transition to an eco-efficient economy;
želi spomniti, da je Komisija sprožila več postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državam članicam, ki niso pravilno izvajale prvega železniškega paketa;
Recalls that the Commission has launched a number of infringement procedures against Member States for not properly implementing the First Railway Package;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da dvostranski sporazumi med državami v sektorju zračnega prevoza ne bodo dajali formalne prednosti določenemu letališču za prevoze iz ene države v drugo;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that bilateral agreements between countries in the air transport sector do not give formal preference to a specific airport for flights going from one country to another;
poziva Komisijo, naj analizira letalski sektor, zlasti sporazume med letalskimi prevozniki o letih pod skupno oznako, ki potrošnikom pogosto ne prinašajo nobenih prednosti, temveč zgolj prispevajo k večji zaprtosti trga, kar vodi v zlorabe prevladujočega položaja in usklajeno ravnanje med podjetji, ki bi sicer morala ravnati konkurenčno;
Urges the Commission to analyse the aviation sector, in particular code-share agreements between airlines which in many cases do not produce any benefits for consumers but merely contribute to greater closure of the market, leading to abuses of dominant positions and concerted practices between undertakings which would otherwise have to act competitively;
z veseljem pričakuje izide javnega posvetovanja o uporabi smernic za letalski sektor iz leta 2005; spodbuja Komisijo, naj skrbno preuči določbe za ocenjevanje socialne pomoči letalskim družbam in pomoči za prestrukturiranje, da bi razjasnila, ali v današnjih tržnih razmerah letalskim prevoznikom še vedno omogočajo enake konkurenčne pogoje ali pa jih je treba revidirati;
Looks forward to the results of the public consultation on the application of the 2005 Aviation Guidelines; encourages the Commission to examine carefully the provisions for assessing social and restructuring aid for airlines in order to clarify whether they are still able to provide a level playing field for air carriers in the market conditions of today, or whether they need a revision;