natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je za razvojno pomoč z velikim učinkom bistvena podpora za gradnjo zmogljivosti, ne samo z instrumentom proračunske podpore, ampak tudi s pomočjo tehničnega sodelovanja; ugotavlja, da bi lahko partnerske države sčasoma povečale svojo odgovornost in se bolj poistovetile s procesi preoblikovanja, če bi jih spodbujali s temi instrumenti;
Points out, that support for capacity development, not only through the instrument of budget support but also by means of technical cooperation, is essential to high-impact development assistance; acknowledges that ownership of, and identification with, transformation processes by partner countries can increase over time when nourished by those instruments;
poudarja, da se zaradi prizadevanj za povečanje učinka pomoči in za doseganje več rezultatov oziroma vrednosti za ta sredstva ne bi smeli izogibati tveganju v razvojni politiki in se osredotočati samo na „lahke države“; vztraja, da mora izkoreninjenje revščine ostati odločilno merilo pri dodeljevanju razvojne pomoči EU in da je treba izboljšati njeno učinkovitost ter se osredotočati na oprijemljive rezultate; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pregledajo področje uporabe finančnih instrumentov in se osredotočijo na dodeljevanje uradne razvojne pomoči najrevnejšim in najranljivejšim državam ter na doseganje najrevnejših slojev družbe, zlasti tistih, ki jim najbolj preti socialna izključenost, kot so ženske, otroci, starejši in invalidi, pri čemer naj upoštevajo dosežke in učinke pomoči; poziva k načrtu za obdobje postopne odprave dodeljevanja sredstev uradne razvojne pomoči državam v vzponu;
Stresses that the aim of increasing the impact of aid and obtaining more results/value for money should not lead to a risk-averse development policy that only focuses on ‘easy countries’; insists that poverty eradication and needs must remain the crucial criteria for the allocation of EU development aid and that aid effectiveness must be improved by focusing on tangible results; calls on the Commission and the Member States to review the scope of financing instruments and to focus the disbursement of Official Development Assistance (ODA) on the poorest and most vulnerable countries and on reaching the poorest layers of society particularly those facing the greatest risks of social exclusion, such as women, children, elderly people and people with disabilities while taking into consideration the results achieved and the impact of aid; calls for programming of a phasing-out period of ODA allocations for emerging countries;
poudarja, da je treba razlikovati med razvojnimi potrebami najmanj razvitih držav in potrebami držav s srednje visokim dohodkom, zlasti novih donatoric; opozarja, da 72 % revnih na svetu živi v državah s srednje visokim dohodkom ter da je treba nadaljevati sodelovanje in dialog, da bi odpravili trdovratno revščino in neenakost; ponavlja, da se sodelovanja z državami s srednje visokim dohodkom in strateškimi partnericami izven okvira uradne razvojne pomoči ne sme financirati iz že tako pičlega razvojnega proračuna;
Stresses the need to distinguish between the development needs of the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and those of the Middle Income Countries (MICs), especially the emerging donors; recalls that 72% of the world's poor live in MICs, and that cooperation and dialogue should therefore continue in order to address persisting poverty and inequality; reiterates that non-ODA cooperation with MICs and strategic partners must not be financed from the already scarce development budget;
meni, da bi moral biti cilj razvojne politike EU odpravljanje ovir za razvoj, kot so dumping kmetijskih proizvodov, breme neupravičenih dolgov, beg kapitala in nepoštena trgovina, ter ustvarjanje mednarodnega okolja, v katerem bo mogoče izkoreniniti revščino ter zagotoviti dostojne dohodke in preživljanje, pa tudi spoštovanje temeljnih človekovih pravic, vključno s socialnimi in gospodarskimi pravicami;
Takes the view that the EU's development policy should aim at eliminating obstacles to development, such as dumping of agricultural products, illegitimate debt burden, capital flight and unfair trade, and at creating an international environment conducive to fighting poverty, guaranteeing decent incomes and livelihoods and to the fulfilment of basic human rights, including social and economic rights;
znova poudarja načelo univerzalnosti človekovih pravic in nediskriminacije kot podlago, na kateri bi lahko povečali učinek razvojne politike EU;
Reiterates the principle of the universality of human rights and non-discrimination as the basis upon which to enhance the impact of EU development policy;
poudarja, da odpravljanje neenakosti, tudi na podlagi spola, krepi na človekovih pravicah temelječ pristop, za katerega so se zavzeli v Evropskem soglasju o razvoju in ki lahko vodi k hitrejšemu zmanjševanju revščine;
Underlines that tackling inequality – including gender inequality – reinforces the human–rights-based approach championed in the European Consensus on Development and can lead to faster poverty reduction;
je seznanjen z nazadovanjem v razvoju, ki je posledica konfliktov in katastrof, ter pomenom stroškovne učinkovitosti vlaganj v preprečevanje;
Recognises the development setbacks resulting from conflicts and disasters, as well as the importance and cost-effectiveness of investing in prevention;
poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj z zainteresiranimi državami članicami da priložnost novim pristopom pomoči, kot so „plačilo po povzetju“, pomoč na podlagi učinka in financiranje na podlagi dosežkov;
Invites the Commission, together with interested Member States, to give new innovative aid approaches, such as cash on delivery, output-based aid and results-based financing, a chance;
poudarja, da je skladnost politik za razvoj bistvena za izvajanje razvojne politike z velikim učinkom in doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; poziva Komisijo, naj jasno opredeli pristojnosti in vodstvo na najvišji ravni v zvezi z uveljavljanjem obveznosti iz Pogodbe za usklajenost politik za razvoj ter naj Komisija, Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje in delegacije EU v ta namen rezervirajo dovolj sredstev;
Stresses that Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) is crucial to the implementation of a high-impact development policy and to the achievement of the MDGs; calls on the Commission to define clearly responsibilities and leadership at the the highest level with regard to enforcement of the Treaty obligation of PCD and calls for sufficient resources to be set aside for this purpose in the Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the EU delegations;
meni, da bi morala razvojna politika EU za zagotavljanje velikega učinka uporabljati pristop, temelječ na bolj diferenciranih spodbudah, tako da bi uspešne države nagradili, najmanj uspešne pa podprli;
Believes that in order to guarantee high impact the EU development policy should have an incentive-based approach based on greater differentiation by rewarding those countries that are performing well and supporting those that are most off track;
vztraja, da je treba pri zastavljanju usmeritev lokaliziranega razvoja v skladu z ustreznimi prednostnimi nalogami prejemnic ustrezno upoštevati usmerjene inovativne mehanizme financiranja s poudarkom na ustvarjanju bogastva, lastninskih pravicah in preprečevanju bega kapitala;
Insists that targeted innovative financing mechanisms focused on wealth creation, property rights and the reduction of capital flight be duly taken into account in devising localised development directions, in accordance with the specific priorities of the recipients;
ponavlja svoje stališče, da je treba doseči skupni cilj, da se do leta 2015 za uradno razvojno pomoči nameni 0,7 % bruto nacionalnega dohodka Unije; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj poiščejo nove vire razvojnega financiranja, kot so obdavčitev finančnih transakcij na svetovni ravni, zasebni finančni sektor in tržno naravnane rešitve; nasprotuje vsaki spremembi ali širitvi opredelitve uradne razvojne pomoči, kot jo je določila OECD;
Reiterates its position according to which the collective target of devoting 0.7 % of the Union's Gross National Income (GNI) to ODA by 2015 must be met; urges the Commission and Member States to find new sources of development funding such as a financial transaction tax at global level, private-sector finance and market-orientated solutions; opposes any alteration or broadening of the definition of ODA, as set by the OECD Development Assistance Committee;
poziva države članice, naj poravnajo svoje neporavnane finančne obveznosti, vključno z obveznostmi v zvezi z zdravjem mater in otrok iz pobude, sprejete na vrhunskem srečanju skupine G8 v Muskoki;
Urges the Member States to deliver on their outstanding financial commitments, including those made on maternal and child health as part of the G8 Muskoka Initiative;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba pomoč zagotavljati na predvidljiv način, ki bi ustrezal nacionalnim načrtom in prednostnim nalogam, in zagotoviti pobude za večjo preglednost in odgovornost vlad držav donatoric, nevladnih organizacij in partnerskih držav;
Underlines that aid should be provided in a predictable manner that is aligned with national plans and priorities and provides incentives for greater transparency and accountability from donor governments, NGOs, and partner states;
meni, da dodana vrednost razvojne pomoči Komisije in bližajoči se rok za uresničitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja upravičujeta precejšnje dejansko povečanje letnih zneskov za uradno razvojno pomoč v obdobju naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira; poudarja, da ne bi smeli zmanjšati deleža celotne evropske pomoči, zagotovljenega v proračunu EU, pomoč pa bi morala biti še naprej osredotočena na revščino;
Takes the view that the added value of the Commission's development aid and the approaching MDGs deadline justifies a significant increase in real terms in the annual figures for ODA in the next MFF (Multiannual Financial Framework) period; stresses that the share of overall European aid channelled through the EU budget should not be reduced and should retain a poverty focus;
opozarja, da mora biti pomoč iz prihodnjih instrumentov EU za razvojno sodelovanje še naprej vezana na merila uradne razvojne pomoči, ki jih je vpeljal Odbor za razvojno pomoč pri OECD;
Recalls that aid under the future EU instruments for development cooperation must continue to be linked to the ODA criteria established by the OECD Development Assistance Committee;
poziva k večjim prizadevanjem na področju izobraževanja in ozaveščanja o razvoju v Evropi; poudarja, da je treba na to gledati kot na sredstvo za povečanje javne podpore razvojnemu financiranju, pa tudi z vidika, da lahko vsak posameznik v Evropi razume svetovna razvojna vprašanja; poudarja, da bi izboljšanje ozaveščenosti javnosti in zmanjšanje brezbrižnosti do težkih razmer v državah v razvoju pripomoglo h krepitvi razvojne politike EU;
Calls for increased efforts in the areas of development education and awareness-raising in Europe; emphasises that this should be seen as a means not only of increasing public support for development spending, but also of enabling every person in Europe to understand global development concerns; stresses that improving public awareness and reducing indifference to the plight of developing countries would help enhance EU development policy;
ugotavlja, da si je treba za povečanje ozaveščenosti javnosti in zmanjšanje brezbrižnosti prizadevati, da bi izboljšali preglednost porabe sredstev pomoči in okrepili širjenje neodvisnih ocenjevalnih študij, ter strožje sankcionirati tiste akterje, za katere se je izkazalo, da so poneverili razvojno pomoč;
Notes that in order to increase public awareness and reduce indifference efforts must be made to improve the transparency of aid spending, enhance the dissemination of independent evaluation studies and apply stricter sanctions to those actors who have been found to be misappropriating development aid;
Spodbujanje rasti v korist revnih
Promoting pro-poor growth
priznava, da je gospodarska rast bistveno gonilo razvoja, vendar poudarja, da je rast le eden od mnogih instrumentov in da maksimiranje rasti ni enakovredno maksimiranju razvoja; zlasti ugotavlja, da bi lahko imela rast precej večji učinek na izkoreninjenje revščine, če bi zmanjšali neenakosti in spoštovali človekove pravice; zato vztraja, da mora biti razvojna pomoč EU usmerjena v rast v korist revnih in odrinjenih na rob družbe, in sicer s sprejemanjem ukrepov, posebej osredotočenih nanje, kot so mikroposojila in mikrofinanciranje ter druge rešitve, ki izhajajo s trga, s čimer bi povečali njihov delež v nacionalni blaginji ter jim omogočili, da postanejo gonilna sila rasti;
Acknowledges that economic growth is a crucial driver of development; stresses, however, that growth is only one instrument among many, and that maximising growth is not equivalent to maximising development; notes in particular that the impact of growth on poverty eradication could be much higher if inequality were reduced and human rights respected; insists, therefore, that EU development assistance must be geared towards pro-poor growth through the adoption of measures which specifically focus on the poor and the marginalized in order to foster an increase in their share of national wealth and allow them to become a driving force for genuinely inclusive growth, such as micro-credit and micro-finance, as well as other market-derived solutions;
ugotavlja, da je politika, ki temelji izključno na gospodarski rasti, pokazala svoje omejene zmožnosti za izkoreninjenje revščine in spodbujanje socialne kohezije, kakor se je izkazalo v nedavni finančni, podnebni, energetski in prehrambni krizi; se zavzema za trajnostni razvoj, ki temelji na pravični trgovini in socialni pravičnosti ter ki sedanjim generacijam koristi, ne da bi ogrožal razpoložljivost virov za prihodnje generacije;
Observes that a policy based solely on economic growth has shown its limited ability to eradicate poverty and promote social cohesion, as demonstrated by the recent financial, climate, energy and food crises; advocates sustainable development based on fair trade and social justice which benefits current generations without endangering resource availability to future generations;
poudarja, da politika za gospodarsko rast ne more uspeti brez spodbujanja socialnih in okoljskih standardov ter izvajanja mehanizmov socialne zaščite;
Stresses that economic growth policies cannot succeed without promotion of social and environmental standards and the implementation of social protection mechanisms;
poudarja, da bi morale politike EU spodbujati rast v gospodarskih panogah, ki revnim nudijo vir zaslužka, kot je kmetijstvo, in se bolj osredotočati na neformalni sektor; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj dajejo prednost ukrepom, ki zagotavljajo varnost zemljiške posesti in revnim lajšajo dostop do zemlje, trgov, posojil in drugih finančnih storitev ter razvijanja veščin, ne da bi še povečali obstoječe neenakosti in utrdili nesimetrične strukture odvisnosti;
Stresses that EU policies should facilitate growth in areas of the economy where the poor earn their livelihoods, such as agriculture, and pay more attention to the informal sector; calls on the Commission and the Member States to favour measures which provide security of land tenure and facilitate poor people's access to land, markets, credits and other financial services and skills development, without aggravating existing inequalities and without consolidating asymmetrical dependence structures;
podpira prizadevanja za spodbujanje industrijskega razvoja in razvoja infrastrukture, ki prispeva k trajnostni gospodarski rasti, pri čemer je treba dosledno upoštevati socialne in okoljske standarde; ugotavlja, da je pospešitev industrijskega in tržnega razvoja najučinkovitejši način za povečanje rasti in reševanje ljudi iz revščine;
Supports efforts to promote industrial development and the development of infrastructure that contributes to sustainable economic growth with full respect for social and environmental standards; notes that the most effective way to increase growth and lift people out of poverty is to enhance industrial and market development;
poudarja, da lahko industrijski razvoj močno preoblikuje nacionalna gospodarstva ter da v nasprotju s kmetijskim izvozom ali pridobivanjem naravnih virov, ki izpostavljata gospodarstvo pretresom, zagotavlja boljše možnosti za dolgoročno rast produktivnosti; poziva države v razvoju, naj se zato posvetijo temu vprašanju ter oblikujejo in uresničijo politike industrializacije s posebnim poudarkom na specializaciji proizvodnje in gradnji trgovinske zmogljivosti;
Points out that industrial development has tremendous transformative potential for national economies and, unlike agricultural exports or natural resources extraction, which expose economies to shocks, is likely to offer enhanced scope for long-term productivity growth; calls on developing countries, therefore, to address this issue by designing and implementing industrialisation policies with a specific focus on manufacturing specialisation and trade-capacity building;
poudarja, da mora biti industrijska rast energetsko učinkovita, tako da z rastjo BDP ne naraščajo odvisnost od nafte in emisije toplogrednih plinov; poziva EU in države članice, naj si nadvse prizadevajo olajšati prenos tehnologije za energetsko učinkovitost in najboljših praks v države v razvoju;
Stresses the need for industrial growth to be energy-efficient, so that growth in GDP is decoupled from oil dependency and greenhouse gas emissions; urges the EU and its Member States to make every effort to facilitate the transfer to developing countries of energy efficiency technology and best practice;
meni, da financiranje projektov za povečanje izvoza ali infrastrukturnih projektov ni nujno najboljša strategija, ki bi koristila širši populaciji in revnim, na rob družbe odrinjenim skupnostim, čeprav je zaradi vidnih rezultatov privlačna;
Considers that funding for large-scale export or infrastructure projects, while attractive in terms of delivering visible results, is not necessarily the best strategy to deliver benefits to the wider population and poor marginalized communities;
poziva, naj Evropska unija in države članice v državah v razvoju bolj sistematično podpirajo agendo za dostojno delo Mednarodne organizacije dela, da bi spodbudili nastajanje visokokakovostnih delovnih mest in zaščito temeljnih delovnih standardov;
Urges that the EU and its Member States support more systematically the ILO's decent work agenda in developing countries, in order to stimulate the creation of high-quality jobs and the protection of core labour standards;
poudarja, da mora biti prednostni cilj politike v podporo rasti diverzifikacija gospodarstva držav v razvoju in zmanjšanje njihove odvisnosti od uvoza;
Emphasises that diversifying the economies of developing countries and reducing their dependence on imports need to be priority objectives for policies supporting growth;
poudarja, da je treba spremljati izvajanje naložbenih projektov, ki jih podpirajo mehanizmi EU za združevanje nepovratnih sredstev in posojil, ter jih obravnavati v študijah učinka mednarodno dogovorjenih socialnih in okoljskih standardov; vztraja, da mora biti postopek odločanja o izbiri projektov pregleden in zagotavljati njihovo usklajenost s strateškimi dokumenti EU, spoštovanje načela odgovornosti države in zavezanost EU, da sprosti svojo pomoč;
Stresses that investment projects supported by EU mechanisms for blending grants and loans must be subject to monitoring of their implementation and impact studies of internationally agreed social and environmental standards; insists that the decision-making process on the selection of projects must be transparent and ensure coherence with EU strategy papers, the principle of country ownership and the EU's commitment to untie its aid;
vztraja, da združevanje ne bi smelo voditi v zamenjavo nepovratnih sredstev uradne razvojne pomoči EU s posojili, ampak bi moralo ustvariti nova sredstva;
Insists that blending should generate new funds, rather than leading to grants under the EU's ODA being replaced by loans;
poudarja, da razvojna politika dejansko ne more postati učinkovita brez spodbujanja ustreznih pravnih okvirov, zlasti na področju lastninskih pravic in pogodbenega prava;
Stresses that development policy cannot become truly effective without the promotion of adequate legal frameworks, especially in the areas of property rights and contract law;
poudarja, da bo spodbujanje enakosti spolov pomagalo sprostiti storilnost žensk in tako prispevalo k trajnostni rasti v korist revnih;
Underlines that promoting gender equality will help to unlock the productivity of women and thus contribute to sustainable and pro-poor growth;
poudarja, da se revščina ne ocenjuje le z monetarnimi kazalniki ter da širše pomeni nepriznavanje temeljnih pravic, kot je pravica do hrane, izobrazbe, zdravja ali svobode izražanja;
Stresses that poverty is not only measured in monetary terms and that in its wider sense it means being denied fundamental rights such as food, education, health or freedom of expression;
poudarja, da je zagotavljanje osnovnih socialnih storitev bistveno za rast v korist revnih in doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; poziva, naj se 20 % vse pomoči EU nameni osnovnim socialnim storitvam, kot jih opredeljujejo Združeni narodi v razvojnih ciljih tisočletja (kazalnik 8.2 za cilj 8: oblikovanje globalnega partnerstva za razvoj), s posebnim poudarkom na prostem splošnem dostopu do osnovnega zdravstvenega varstva in osnovnega izobraževanja ter ob upoštevanju podpore EU pobudi „izobrazba za vse“ in sporočila o vlogi EU na področju zdravja v svetu iz leta 2010; ponavlja, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti ranljivim skupinam in tistim, ki jim še posebej preti socialna izključenost, kot so invalidi;
Emphasises that the provision of basic social services is crucial to pro-poor growth and reaching the MDGs; calls for 20% of all EU assistance to be earmarked for basic social services, as defined by the United Nations in the Millennium Development Goals (indicator 8.2 for goal 8:‘Develop a global partnership for development), with a special focus on free and universal access to primary health care and basic education, taking into account the EU's support for the ’Education for All' initiative, and the 2010 Communication on the EU's role in global health; reiterates the need for specific attention to be paid to vulnerable groups and those with a high risk of social exclusion, such as people with disabilities;
poudarja, da sta izobraževanje deklet in spodbujanje enakosti spolov v izobraževanju ključna dejavnika razvoja ter da politike in ukrepi, ki ne obravnavajo neenakosti spolov, zamujajo ključne razvojne priložnosti; poudarja, da izobraževanje deklet kot razvojna naložba prinaša enega najvišjih donosov, saj ustvarja tako zasebne kot družbene koristi, ki so jih deležne posameznice, družine in celotna družba, in sicer z zmanjšanjem plodnosti žensk, znižanjem stopenj smrtnosti mater, novorojencev in otrok, zaščito pred okužbo z virusom HIV oziroma AIDS-om, povečanjem udeležbe žensk v delovni sili in njihovega zaslužka ter ustvarjanjem medgeneracijskih izobraževalnih koristi;
Underlines that girls' education and the promotion of gender equality in education are vital to development, and that policies and actions that do not address gender disparities miss critical development opportunities; underlines that girls' education yields some of the highest returns of all development investments, yielding both private and social benefits that accumulate to individuals, families and society at large by reducing women's fertility rates, lowering maternal, infant and child mortality rates, protecting against HIV/AIDS infection, increasing women's labour force participation rates and earnings and creating intergenerational education benefits;