natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so se represivni ukrepi proti članom demokratične opozicije, svobodnim medijem, aktivistom civilne družbe in zagovornikom človekovih pravic še okrepili, kljub ponavljajočim se pozivom mednarodne skupnosti, naj jih nemudoma odpravijo; ker te razmere pomenijo resno kršitev številnih mednarodnih zavez Belorusije;
whereas repressive measures against members of the democratic opposition, the free media, civil society activists and human rights defenders have been stepped up even further, despite repeated calls from the international community to halt them immediately; whereas this situation constitutes a serious breach of numerous international commitments given by Belarus,
ostro obsoja vse obsodbe na podlagi obtožnic zaradi množičnih izgredov in meni, da so obsodbe pristranske in politično motivirane; poudarja, da po poročanjih oblast obtožencem ni uspela dokazati krivde, da so sojenja potekala za zaprtimi vrati, da priporniki na sojenje niso smeli vabiti svojih prič ter se niso mogli zaupno in redno sestajati s svojimi pravnimi zastopniki ter da so odvetniki obtožencev prejeli več opozoril od ministrstva za pravosodje, nekateri pa so bili izključeni iz zbornice; zato izjavlja, da se sojenja niso vodila nepristransko;
Strongly condemns all convictions on the basis of the criminal charge of ‘mass rioting’ and finds them arbitrary and politically motivated; emphasises that according to reports the authorities have failed to prove the guilt of the accused, that the trials were held behind closed doors, that detainees were denied the opportunity to call their witnesses and to meet discreetly and on a regular basis with their legal representatives, that the lawyers of the accused received several warnings from the Ministry of Justice and that some of them have been disbarred; declares, therefore, that the trials were not conducted in an impartial manner;
meni, da so vse obtožbe proti predsedniškim kandidatom Vladimirju Njakljajevu, Vitalu Rimaševskemu, Mikolaju Statkeviču, Dimitriju Usu in Andreju Sanjikovu nezakonite in nedopustne; poziva k oprostitvi in opustitvi preganjanja kandidatov; s tem v zvezi obsoja nespoštovanje temeljne pravice do zbiranja in svobode izražanja, ki so ga pokazale beloruske oblasti, ter poziva, naj se takoj in brezpogojno izpustijo vsi protestniki, ki so še vedno v priporu, ter naj se umaknejo vse obtožbe proti njim;
Considers all charges against the presidential candidates Vladimir Neklyayev, Vitaly Rymashevsky, Nikolai Statkevich, Dmitry Uss and Andrei Sannikov to be illegal and inadmissible; calls for the candidates to be acquitted and spared any further persecution; in that connection, condemns the lack of respect for the fundamental rights of freedom of assembly and of expression shown by the Belarusian authorities, and calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all protestors still in custody and for all charges against them to be dropped;
izraža globoko zaskrbljenost zaradi vse slabšega položaja zagovornikov človekovih pravic v Belorusiji; ostro obsoja nedavna obrekovanja: v enem od primerov so beloruski predsednik in več novinarjev medijev v državni lasti obrekovali predsednika centra za človekove pravice Vjasna Alesa Bjalackega in v svojih komentarjih o bombnem napadu trdili, da je v državi peta kolona;
Expresses its deep concern at the deteriorating situation of human rights defenders in Belarus; strongly condemns the recent defamatory allegations against, for example, Ales Bialiatski, President of the Human Rights Centre ‘Viasna’, made by the Belarusian President and several journalists in the state-owned media, who claimed, in their comments concerning the bomb attack on the Minsk subway, that ‘there [was] a fifth column in the country’;
obsoja stalno vzdušje strahu in zastraševanje političnih nasprotnikov v Belorusiji ter še vedno trajajoče preganjanje predstavnikov opozicije vse od predsedniških volitev decembra 2010;
Condemns the persisting climate of fear and intimidation of political opponents in Belarus and the ongoing persecution of opposition figures since the December 2010 presidential elections;
poziva beloruske oblasti, naj prenehajo ovirati svobodno gibanje ukrajinskih državljanov Marine Capok in Maksima Kitcjuka ter ruskega državljana Andreja Jurova, predstavnikov odbora za mednarodni nadzor razmer na področju človekovih pravic v Belorusiji, ki ne smejo vstopiti na belorusko ozemlje, ter ruskih zagovornikov človekovih pravic Alika Mnacnakjana in Viktorije Gromove, ki so ju 4. maja 2011 najprej zadržali v pisarnah centra za človekove pravice Vjasna in ju kmalu za tem izgnali iz Belorusije ter jima za dve leti prepovedali ponoven vstop; v zvezi s tem obsoja vsa dejanja beloruskih oblasti proti zagovornikom človekovih pravic;
Urges the Belarusian authorities to remove the obstacles to the freedom of movement of the Ukrainian citizens Marina Tsapok and Maxim Kitsyuk and the Russian citizen Andrey Yurov, representatives of the Committee on International Control over the Human Rights Situation in Belarus, who were denied entry to the territory of Belarus, and to that of Alik Mnatsnakyan and Viktoria Gromova, Russian human rights defenders who were detained on 4 May 2011 in the office of the Human Rights Centre ‘Viasna’ and shortly after deported from Belarus and banned from re-entering the country for two years; in that connection, condemns all actions against human rights defenders carried out by the Belarusian authorities;
obsoja sistematično nadlegovanje in ustrahovanje neodvisnih novinarjev in medijskih hiš v Belorusiji ter vse močnejši pritisk nanje; v zvezi s tem poziva beloruske oblasti, naj prekinejo postopek ukinitve tednikov
Condemns the systematic harassment and intimidation of and the mounting pressure on independent journalists and media outlets in Belarus; in that connection, urges the Belarusian authorities to halt the procedure to close down the
, naj ne omejujejo dostopa do dveh neodvisnih spletnih portalov
weeklies, to refrain from limiting access to two independent internet portals,
Beloruski partizan
Bielorusskij Partizan,
, zaradi česar bi bil pluralizem medijev izredno okrnjen, in naj izpustijo Andrzeja Poczobuta ter opustijo vse obtožbe proti njemu;
which would result in the severe limitation of media pluralism in Belarus, and to release Andrzej Poczobut and drop all charges against him;
poziva Komisijo, Svet, visoko predstavnico in druge države partnerice EU, naj okrepijo omejevalne ukrepe proti beloruskemu režimu, med drugim naj uvedejo ciljno usmerjene gospodarske sankcije, zlasti proti podjetjem v državni lasti;
Calls on the Commission, the Council, the High Representative and other EU partner countries to extend the restrictive measures against the Belarusian regime, including by imposing targeted economic sanctions, in particular against state-owned enterprises;
poudarja, da mora EU glede na trajajoče zatiranje opozicije, ki je brez primere, najti nove načine za podporo beloruski civilni družbi pri spodbujanju ozaveščanja javnosti, preprečevanju popolne razdrobitve politične opozicije ter podpori političnim alternativam Lukašenkovemu režimu; poziva, naj EU tudi v prihodnje nudi pomoč demokratičnim opozicijskim strankam, organizacijam civilne družbe in neodvisnim medijskim hišam ter jo okrepi, na primer prek evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice;
Emphasises that, in the light of the continuous, unprecedented repression of the opposition, the EU needs to find new ways to assist Belarusian civil society in facilitating awareness-raising among the public, preventing the total fragmentation of the political opposition and sustaining a political alternative to the Lukashenka regime; calls for EU assistance to democratic opposition parties, civil society organisations and independent media outlets to be maintained and stepped up, for example via the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights;
poudarja, da bo za sodelovanje EU z Belorusijo potrebna izpolnitev strogih pogojev in bo odvisno od zavezanosti Belorusije spoštovanju človekovih pravic in pravne države, kakor je zapisano v skupni izjavi praškega srečanja na vrhu o vzhodnem partnerstvu z dne 7. maja 2009, katere podpisnica je tudi beloruska vlada;
Stresses that potential EU engagement with Belarus will be subject to strict conditionality and contingent on a commitment by Belarus to respect human rights and the rule of law, as stated in the Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit of 7 May 2009, co-signed by the Belarusian Government;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje podpredsednici Komisije/visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, parlamentarnima skupščinama OVSE in Sveta Evrope ter vladi in parlamentu Belorusije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Council, the Commission, the governments and the parliaments of the Member States, the Parliamentary Assemblies of the OSCE and the Council of Europe and the Government and Parliament of Belarus.
ker je izvajanje in izvrševanje zakonodaje EU o odpadkih slabo,
whereas implementation and enforcement of EU waste legislation is poor,
ker je pomanjkanje družbene odgovornosti in osveščenosti o okoljevarstvenih vprašanjih še vedno težava številnih držav članic,
whereas the lack of social responsibility and awareness of environmental issues continues to be a problem in many Member States,
ker je gibanje „Let's do it!“ od leta 2008 izvedlo več nacionalnih civilnih državljanskih pobud, ki so pritegnile ogromno udeležencev v Estoniji, Latviji, Litvi, Portugalski, Sloveniji in Romuniji, in ker so te pobude prinesle konkretne rezultate, kot je popis in očiščenje ilegalnih odlagališč odpadkov,
whereas national civilian grass-root initiatives in the framework of the ‘Let's do it!’ action movement have taken place and have led to huge participation by citizens in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Slovenia and Romania since 2008 and these initiatives have produced concrete results such as mapping and cleaning up illegal waste littering,
ugotavlja, da je pobuda „Let's do it world!“ prostovoljno gibanje, ki je vse evropske države pozvalo, naj združijo moči za največjo čistilno akcijo doslej, ki naj bi potekala na en dan v letu 2012;
Considers that ‘Let's do it world!’ is a voluntary action movement inviting all the countries of Europe to join together for the biggest clean-up action ever in their country on one day in 2012;
poziva politike, naj dejavno spodbujajo pobude, ter državljane, da se jim pridružijo;
Invites politicians to actively promote initiatives and citizens to join the action;
meni, da bi bilo treba ta učinkoviti instrument široko spodbujati, da bi povečali osveščenost in odgovornost za ravnanje z odpadki, s tem pa dosegli najvišjo možno stopnjo recikliranja;
Considers that this effective instrument should be widely promoted in order to raise awareness and responsibility for waste management aiming at the highest possible recycling rate;
poziva Komisijo, naj z vsemi razpoložljivimi sredstvi podpre to pobudo ter vzpostavi spletno mesto, kjer bodo objavljeni obstoječi podatki o nacionalnih evidencah ravnanja z odpadki in zemljevidi s prikazanimi ilegalnimi odlagališči;
Calls on the Commission to support this initiative by all available means and also to launch a website publishing existing data on national waste registers and maps showing the location of illegal dump sites;
poziva države članice, naj si še bolj prizadevajo za izvajanje in izvrševanje obstoječe zakonodaje EU o odpadkih na svojem ozemlju;
Calls on the Member States to make additional efforts to fully implement and enforce the existing EU waste legislation in their countries;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to izjavo skupaj z imeni podpisnikov Seznam podpisnikov je objavljen v Prilogi 1 k zapisniku z dne 12. maja 2011 ( P7_PV-PROV(2011)05-12(ANN1) ).
Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories The list of signatories is published in Annex 1 to the Minutes of 12 May 2011 ( P7_PV-PROV(2011)05-12(ANN1) ).
posreduje Komisiji in Svetu ter parlamentom in vladam 27 držav članic.
, to the Commission, the Council and the governments and parliaments of the 27 Member States.
ob upoštevanju člena 286(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0103/2011 ),
having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7-0103/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se je Odboru za proračunski nadzor na seji dne 24. maja 2011 predstavil kandidat, ki ga Svet predlaga za člana Računskega sodišča,
having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 24 May 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council's nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0190/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0190/2011 ),
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep posreduje Svetu in v vednost Računskemu sodišču, drugim institucijam Evropske unije in revizijskim organom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. junija 2011 o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Ágnes Hankiss ( 2010/2213(IMM) )
European Parliament decision of 7 June 2011 on the request for waiver of the immunity of Ágnes Hankiss ( 2010/2213(IMM) )
ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Ágnes Hankiss, ki jo je 6. julija 2010 posredovalo osrednje okrožno sodišče iz Bude in ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 6. septembra 2010,
having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Ágnes Hankiss, forwarded by the Central District Court of Buda on 6 July 2010 and announced in plenary sitting on 6 September 2010,
po zaslišanju Ágnes Hankiss dne 11. aprila 2011 v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
having heard Ágnes Hankiss on 11 April 2011 in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju člena 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije z dne 8. aprila 1965 ter člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
having regard to Article 9 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0196/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0196/2011 ),
ker je osrednje okrožno sodišče iz Bude, Budimpešta, zahtevalo odvzem imunitete poslanki Evropskega parlamenta Ágnes Hankiss, da bi proti njej lahko izpeljalo obnovljeni kazenski postopek, kakor je bilo naloženo s sodbo vrhovnega sodišča Republike Madžarske,
whereas the Central District Court of Buda, Budapest, has requested the waiver of immunity of Ágnes Hankiss, a Member of the Parliament, in order to conduct renewed criminal proceedings against Ágnes Hankiss as ordered by the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Hungary,
ker se zahteva za odvzem imunitete Ágnes Hankiss veže na domnevno kaznivo dejanje zoper čast in dobro ime po členu 181 madžarskega kazenskega zakonika, ki naj bi ga Ágnes Hankiss zagrešila z izjavo v oddaji
whereas the waiver of the immunity of Ágnes Hankiss relates to an alleged offence of defamation under Section 181 of the Hungarian Criminal Code as a result of a statement made during the programme ‘
23. januarja 2004,
’ on 23 January 2004,
ker Ágnes Hankiss toži zasebni tožilec v obtožnici z 18. februarja 2004, ki je bila pred osrednjim okrožnim sodiščem v Budi vložena 23. februarja 2004; ker je osrednje okrožno sodišče iz Bude v zadevi razsodilo dne 28. junija 2005, na razsodbo pa je bila vložena pritožba pred občinskim sodiščem v Budimpešti, ki je sodbo okrožnega sodišča razveljavilo 3. februarja 2006,
whereas Ágnes Hankiss was accused by a private plaintiff in an accusation dated 18 February 2004 and submitted to the Central District Court of Buda on 23 February 2004; whereas the Central District Court of Buda gave its judgment on 28 June 2005, which was then appealed against in the Budapest Municipal Court and annulled by that Court on 3 February 2006,
ker je bila zaradi tega zadeva vrnjena osrednjemu okrožnemu sodišču v Budi, ki je 6. februarja 2009 Ágnes Hankiss oprostilo obtožbe; ker se je zasebni tožilec na to razsodbo pritožil pred občinskim sodiščem v Budimpešti, ki se je 25. marca 2009 odločilo, da sodbo okrožnega sodišča v celoti potrdi,
whereas as a result the case was referred back to the Central District Court of Buda, which acquitted Ágnes Hankiss of the charges on 6 February 2009; whereas an appeal was brought by the plaintiff against this judgment in the Budapest Municipal Court, which on 25 March 2009 decided to uphold the judgment of the District Court on all its grounds,
ker je 12. novembra 2009 vrhovno sodišče Republike Madžarske obe sodbi razveljavilo na podlagi kršitve materialnega prava in je osrednjemu okrožnemu sodišču v Budi naročilo, naj ponovno razsodi v zadevi,
whereas on 12 November 2009 the Supreme Court of the Republic of Hungary annulled both judgments on the grounds of breach of substantive law and instructed the Central District Court of Buda to conduct new proceedings,
ker je Ágnes Hankiss od 15. julija 2009 poslanka Evropskega parlamenta,
whereas Ágnes Hankiss has been a Member of the Parliament since 15 July 2009,
ker v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije med zasedanji Parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države; in ker to Parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu poslancu,
whereas, according to Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, during the sessions of the Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of its parliament; and whereas this does not prevent the Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
ker člen 552(1) madžarskega zakona o kazenskem postopku določa, da se kazenski postopek proti osebi, ki uživa imuniteto, prekine in se zahteva odvzem te imunitete, in ker člen 551(1) tega zakona določa, da kazenski postopek proti, med drugim, poslancu Evropskega parlamenta lahko steče samo po odvzemu imunitete,
whereas Section 552(1) of the Hungarian Act on Criminal Proceedings requires that criminal proceedings against a person enjoying immunity be suspended and a waiver of such immunity requested, and whereas Section 551(1) of that Act provides that criminal proceedings may only be initiated against, inter alia, a Member of the European Parliament after the suspension of immunity,
ker člen 12(1) člena zakona LVII iz leta 2004 določa, da mora sodišče za odvzem imunitete v zasebnih tožbah zahtevo nasloviti na predsednika Parlamenta,
whereas Section 12(1) of Act LVII of 2004 provides that a request for waiver of immunity in cases subject to private action is to be made by the court to the President of Parliament,
ker je v novem postopku po razveljavitvi Ágnes Hankiss navedla, da je poslanka Evropskega parlamenta, zaradi česar je osrednje okrožno sodišče v Budi na osnovi člena 552(1) madžarskega zakona o kazenskem postopku in člena 12 zakona LVII iz leta 2004 sklenilo, da postopek prekine in zahteva odvzem imunitete,
whereas in the new proceedings following the annulment Ágnes Hankiss stated that she is a Member of the Parliament and in consequence the Central District Court of Buda, acting on the basis of Section 552(1) of the Hungarian Act on Criminal Proceedings and Section 12 of Act LVII of 2004, decided to suspend the proceedings and ask for the waiver of immunity,
ker je zato ustrezno, da se v tem primeru priporoči odvzem imunitete,
whereas it is therefore appropriate to recommend that parliamentary immunity be waived in this instance,
se odloči odvzeti imuniteto Ágnes Hankiss;
Decides to waive the immunity of Ágnes Hankiss;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in poročilo pristojnega odbora nemudoma posreduje pristojnemu organu Republike Madžarske in Ágnes Hankiss.
Instructs its President to forward this decision and the report of its competent committee immediately to the competent authority of the Republic of Hungary and to Ágnes Hankiss.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. junija 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1514/98 o dokazilu o poreklu blaga za nekatere tekstilne izdelke, iz oddelka XI kombinirane nomenklature, sproščene v prosti promet v Skupnosti, ter o pogojih za sprejem takšnega dokazila ter o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3030/93 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz nekaterih tekstilnih izdelkov po poreklu iz tretjih držav ( KOM(2010)0544 – C7-0316/2010 – 2010/0272(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 June 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1541/98 on proof of origin for certain textile products falling within Section XI of the Combined Nomenclature and released for free circulation in the Community, and on the conditions for the acceptance of such proof and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3030/93 on common rules for imports of certain textile products from third countries ( COM(2010)0544 – C7-0316/2010 – 2010/0272(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0544 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0544 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 207(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7-0316/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0316/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7-0156/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A7-0156/2011 ),
sprejme kot svoje stališče v prvi obravnavi, kakor je določeno v nadaljevanju;
Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. junija 2011.
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure Position of the European Parliament of 7 June 2011.
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1541/98 UL L 202, 18.7.1998, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1541/98 OJ L 202, 18.7.1998, p.
določa pravila o dokazilu porekla za nekatere tekstilne izdelke s poreklom iz tretjih držav, s katerimi je Unija sklenila dvostranske sporazume o tekstilu, protokole ali druge ureditve, ali za tekstilne izdelke, na podlagi katerih je Unija določila sistem nadzora za spremljanje smernic pri uvozu izdelkov ali za katere uporablja posebne zaščitne ukrepe.
lays down the rules on proof of origin for certain textile products originating in third countries with which the Union concluded bilateral textile agreements, protocols or other arrangements, or for textile products in respect of which the Union has established a system of surveillance in order to monitor the trends of imports of products or to which it applies special safeguard measures.
Od sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 1541/98 je na tem področju prišlo do pomembnega napredka.
Since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1541/98 a number of major developments have taken place.