natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je okrepljena usmerjenost plačil v rezultate, h kateri poziva Komisija, protislovna, saj bodo ti doseženi, če bodo projekti najprej financirani; se boji, da bo spremljanje zelo birokratsko, vendar meni, da so sprejemljive zahteve, da se izplačilo pogojuje z dokazano skladnostjo med projekti in na primer strategijo 2020;
Regards the Commission's call for payments to be more closely geared to results as illogical, in that results will only be achieved by financing the projects in the first place; is concerned that the monitoring is likely to be highly bureaucratic, but regards as conceivable requirements which make payments contingent on proven consistency between the projects and, for example, the Europe 2020 strategy;
meni, da je po izplačilu sredstev EU za projekte sicer potrebno povračilo izdatkov, vendar banke in druge finančne inštitucije upravičencev ne bi smele biti dodatno obremenjevati z obrestnimi merami, ki ne odražajo majhnega dejavnika tveganja takih posojil;
Considers that, while reimbursement should arrive after EU funding has paid out for projects, no extra burdens should be placed on the beneficiaries, in the form of interest rates that do not reflect the low risk factor of such loans, by banks or other financial institutions;
poziva k diverzifikaciji sankcijskih mehanizmov, med drugim v obliki sistema bonusov za države članice, v katerih je izvajanje pravilno, zlasti z upravnimi olajšavami;
Calls for diversification of the penalty mechanisms, including among other aspects a bonus system for those Member States which comply with the implementation requirements, in particular through administrative concessions;
opozarja, da je posebnost Evropskega socialnega sklada v nasprotju z drugimi strukturnimi skladi v tem, da je tesno povezan s ciljnimi skupinami, ki jih podpira, in da ga je treba oblikovati tako, da bo omogočal veliko število manjših lokalnih projektov; poziva k temu, naj se od držav članic zahteva, da sredstva takoj posredujejo za projekte in se tako prepreči, da bi imeli manjši upravičenci težave; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo prožnost pri finančnem izvajanju programov, upoštevajo načelo sorazmernosti glede potrebnega časa, truda in finančnih prispevkov ter poenostavijo postopke in zmanjšajo pretirane upravne stroške in druge ovire v korist projektov in morebitnih upravičencev, da bi Evropski socialni sklad bolje prispeval k doseganju ciljev EU na področju rasti in ustvarjanja delovnih mest; poziva Komisijo, naj poveča izbiro glede možnosti financiranja, ki jih imajo na razpolago organi upravljanja in upravičenci, ter predlaga možnost, da se ob običajnem računovodstvu uporabi metoda standardnih stroškov;
Recalls that, unlike other structural funds, the specificity of the ESF is that it is closely linked to the target groups it supports and that it needs to be shaped in a way that allows for many small-scale, locally based projects; calls for the Member States to be required to pass on funding to projects immediately, so as to rule out problems for smaller beneficiaries; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure flexibility in the financial implementation of programmes, to take the principle of proportionality regarding time and efforts and financial contribution into account when fixing control and audit obligations, and to simplify procedures and reduce excessive administrative costs and any obstacles, for the benefit of the projects and the potential beneficiaries, thereby making the ESF better able to contribute to achieving the EU's objectives for growth and job creation; calls on the Commission to increase the choice for management authorities and beneficiaries as regards financing options and to propose the possibility of standard cost options alongside traditional accounting;
podpira predlog Komisije, naj se v nekaterih situacijah razen za prvo leto financiranja in čezmejne programe dosledno uporabljata pravili N+2 in N+3, po možnosti na ravni dodelitve sredstev državam članicam, da se omogoči večja prožnost, ter da mora kakršno koli odstopanje od pravila samodejnega preklica dodelitve odražati le prilagoditev dodatnemu upravnemu bremenu, povezanemu z novimi določbami o strateškem načrtovanju, usmerjenosti v rezultate in predhodni pogojenosti; pri čezmejnih programih zagovarja celo pravilo N+3, da se upoštevajo počasnejši upravni postopki zaradi jezikovnih in kulturnih izzivov; meni, da to zagotavlja ravnotežje med visokokakovostnimi naložbami ter gladkim in hitrim izvajanjem programov;
Supports the Commission's proposal that the N+2 and N+3 rules should, in certain situations, be applied systematically, possibly at the level of Member States' allocations, in order to provide greater flexibility, except in the first year of funding and except for cross-border programmes, and that any other derogations from the automatic decommitment rule should only reflect an adaptation to the administrative burdens imposed by new provisions related to strategic programming, results-based orientation and ex ante conditionality; supports, indeed, the application of an N+3 rule in the case of cross-border programmes, in order to take account of the slower administrative processes resulting from the linguistic and cultural challenges they face; considers this will guarantee that a balance is struck between high-quality investment and smooth and speedy programme implementation;
poudarja pomen evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta za kohezijsko politiko z vidika čezmejnega sodelovanja z državami zunaj EU; je seznanjen s sedanjimi težavami pri izvajanju programa; je prepričan, da bo treba programe čezmejnega sodelovanja evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta nujno spet vključiti v kohezijsko politiko; meni, da prav infrastrukturne (prometne, energetske in okoljske) povezave s sosednjimi državami ugodno vplivajo na evropske obmejne regije; zahteva, naj se sredstva iz evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta bolj usmerijo v strateške potrebe v zvezi z oskrbo z energijo in transportno infrastrukturo; poudarja vlogo, ki jo imajo lahko pri tem makroregije; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost ustvarjanja večjih sinergij med pobudami v okviru Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj, instrumentom predpristopne pomoči, evropskim sosedskim in partnerskim instrumentom ter Evropskim razvojnim skladom; Komisijo tudi poziva, naj oceni, ali bi bilo mogoče strukture, ki se že uporabljajo v regionalnih politikah, uporabiti tudi za upravljanje evropskega sosedskega in partnerskega instrumenta;
Emphasises the importance of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) for cohesion policy with regard to cross-border cooperation with states outside the EU; takes note of the current problems with implementation of the programme; is convinced that it will ultimately prove necessary to reincorporate the ENPI cross-border cooperation programmes into cohesion policy; sees infrastructure (transport, energy and environmental) links with neighbouring countries as having particularly positive effects on the European border regions; calls for ENPI funding to focus more closely on strategic needs in relation to energy and to transport infrastructure; underlines the role that macroregions can play in this context; calls on the Commission to look into the feasibility of establishing better synergies between ERDF initiatives, the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) and the European Development Fund (EDF); asks the Commission, furthermore, to evaluate whether the structures already used in the regional policy sphere could also be applied to the administration of the ENPI;
ponavlja zahtevo po odgovorni vključitvi Odbora za regionalni razvoj v prihodnje oblikovanje teh instrumentov;
Reiterates its call for the Committee on Regional Development to be involved in and share responsibility for determining the form that these instruments will take in future;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. julija 2011 o prihodnosti proračunske podpore EU državam v razvoju ( 2010/2300(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 5 July 2011 on the future of EU budget support to developing countries ( 2010/2300(INI) )
ob upoštevanju obveznosti, sprejetih na vrhunskem srečanju skupine G-8 v Gleneaglesu leta 2005 ter na vseh nadaljnjih srečanjih držav skupine G-8 in G-20, o količini pomoči, pomoči podsaharski Afriki in kakovosti pomoči,
having regard to the commitments on aid volume, aid to sub-Saharan Africa and aid quality made by the G8 at the 2005 Gleneagles Summit and all subsequent G8 and G20 meetings,
ob upoštevanju Deklaracije tisočletja Organizacije združenih narodov z dne 8. septembra 2000,
having regard to the Millennium Declaration adopted by the United Nations on 8 September 2000,
ter Kodeksa ravnanja Evropske unije o dopolnjevanju in delitvi dela v okviru razvojne politike Sklepi Sveta št. 9558/07 z dne 15. maja 2007.
and the European Union Code of Conduct on Complementarity and Division of Labour in Development Policies Council Conclusions 9558/07, 15.5.2007.
ob upoštevanju člena 208 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki določa, da „Unija upošteva cilje razvojnega sodelovanja pri politikah, ki jih izvaja in ki lahko vplivajo na države v razvoju“,
having regard to Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which stipulates that ‘the Union shall take account of the objectives of development cooperation in the policies that it implements which are likely to affect developing countries’,
ob upoštevanju člena 25(1)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja (instrument za razvojno sodelovanje) UL L 378, 27.12.2006, str.
having regard to Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation (the ‘Development Cooperation Instrument’ OJ L 378, 27.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 61(2) sporazuma iz Cotonouja,
having regard to Article 61(2) of the Cotonou Agreement,
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 5. maja 2010 s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna sedmega, osmega, devetega in desetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada za proračunsko leto 2008 UL L 252, 25.9.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 5 May 2010 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth European Development Funds for the financial year 2008 OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 3. februarja 2011 o stališču Sveta iz prve obravnave z namenom sprejetja uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0030 .
having regard to its position of 3 February 2011 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0030 .
ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 11/2010 – Kako je Komisija upravljala splošno proračunsko podporo v državah AKP ter latinskoameriških in azijskih državah;
having regard to Court of Auditors Special Report No 11/2010 entitled ‘The Commission's management of general budget support in ACP, Latin American and Asian countries’,
ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – Prihodnost proračunske podpore EU za tretje države (KOM(2010) 586),
having regard to the Green Paper from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the future of budget support to third countries ( COM(2010)0586 ),
ob upoštevanju dokumenta Komisije iz leta 2007, naslovljenega „Smernice o programiranju, oblikovanju in upravljanju splošne proračunske podpore“ („Guidelines on the Programming, Design & Management of General Budget Support“),
having regard to the Commission's 2007 document entitled ‘Guidelines on the Programming, Design & Management of General Budget Support’,
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije iz leta 2008 „Proračunska pomoč: učinkovit način financiranja razvoja?“,
having regard to the Commission's 2008 report entitled ‘Budget support: The effective way to finance development?’
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za gospodarski razvoj , finance in trgovino skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU o proračunski podpori kot obliki javne pomoči za razvoj držav AKP,
having regard to the report of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly's Committee on Economic Development, Finance and Trade on budgetary support as a means of delivering official development assistance (ODA) in ACP countries,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za proračun in Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7–0206/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0206/2011 ),
ker sta zmanjšanje revščine in, v končni fazi, njeno izkoreninjenje v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo glavni cilj razvojne politike Evropske unije,
whereas the reduction and ultimate eradication of poverty is the European Union development policy's primary objective under the Lisbon Treaty,
ker je proračunska podpora postala ena najpomembnejših oblik pomoči,
whereas budget support has become one of the key forms of aid,
ker je za številne donatorje splošna in sektorska proračunska podpora sredstvo za spodbujanje partnerskih držav k privzemanju razvojne politike in trajnostnih reformnih procesov, za krepitev institucij in sistemov za nacionalno odgovornost ter spodbujanje rasti, zmanjševanje revščine in doseganje razvojnih ciljev,
whereas many donors consider general and sectoral budget support as a means of fostering partner countries' ownership of development policies and lasting reform processes, strengthening national accountability institutions and systems, and facilitating growth, poverty reduction and the achievement of development objectives,
ker je nujen razvoj operativnih zmogljivosti, da bi sploh lahko zagotovili pogoje za dejavnosti na podlagi programov, vključno s proračunsko podporo ali drugimi modeli,
whereas operational capacity development is needed in order to create in the first place the preconditions for programme-based approaches, including budget support or more far-reaching models,
ker je mogoče s proračunsko podporo odpraviti nekatere pomanjkljivosti ustaljenega projektnega pristopa (visoki stroški transakcij, razdrobljeni vzporedni sistemi) in s tem povečati doslednost in učinkovitost ukrepov EU, kakor je poudarjeno v Lizbonski pogodbi,
whereas budget support helps to overcome certain weaknesses of the traditional project-based approach (high transaction costs, fragmented parallel systems) and thus increase the coherence and efficiency of EU measures, aims which are stressed in the Lisbon Treaty,
ker mora proračunska podpora prispevati k izboljšanju kakovosti in učinkovitosti pomoči, zlasti v zvezi z načeloma odgovornosti in usklajevanja, saj je s političnim dialogom med donatorji in koristniki prispevke mogoče prilagoditi prednostnim ciljem, ki jih določijo države v svojih nacionalnih strategijah za zmanjšanje revščine,
whereas budget support should help to improve the quality and effectiveness of aid, with particular reference to the principles of ownership and harmonisation, given that political dialogue between donors and recipients makes it possible to tailor contributions to the priorities countries have set in their national poverty reduction strategies,
ker ostaja „dinamični pristop“ v splošnem pogojevanju proračunske podpore kljub tveganjem, na katera je opozorilo Evropsko računsko sodišče v svojih poročilih o tej podpori, zelo pomemben instrument političnega dialoga; ker proračunska podpora kljub vsemu ne daje možnosti prostega ukrepanja,
whereas, despite the risks mentioned by the European Court of Auditors in its reports on budget support, the ‘dynamic approach’ in the general conditionality of budget support is still a very important instrument of political dialogue; whereas budget support must nevertheless under no circumstances be considered as a ‘blank cheque’,
ker se lahko vse zaveze, ki jih sprejmejo države prejemnice do svojih partnerjev, včasih težko uporabijo, saj donatorji včasih postavljajo nasprotujoče si pogoje,
whereas the range of commitments made by beneficiary countries to all their partners may, in some cases, make their use difficult, given that the conditions imposed by donors are sometimes contradictory,
ker se je Evropska unija pri sklepanju sporazumov o partnerstvu doslej ozirala bolj na kršenje človekovih pravic (t. i. pravic prve generacije) kot na kršenje socialnih, ekonomskih in kulturnih pravic (t. i. pravic druge generacije),
whereas the European Union has hitherto referred more frequently to violations of human rights (‘first-generation rights’) in partnership agreements rather than violations of social, economic and cultural rights (‘second-generation rights’),
ker bi se morali vsi donatorji posvetovati, da bi tako preprečili kakršno koli neskladje pri pogojevanju,
whereas all the donors should consult one another in order to prevent inconsistencies in conditionality,
ker je v skladu s členom 2(3) Lizbonske pogodbe cilj Evropske unije spodbujanje trajnostnega socialno-tržnega gospodarstva, kar bi moralo veljati tudi za razvojno politiko in politiko sosedskih odnosov,
whereas, pursuant to Article 2(3) of the Lisbon Treaty, it is an objective of the European Union to work for a sustainable social market economy, and whereas this should also apply with reference to development policy and relations under the neighbourhood policy,
ker je to, da partnerska vlada prevzame odgovornost za upravljanje proračuna, z vidika njenih državljanov bistven dejavnik njenih razvojih zmogljivosti, saj področje javnih financ nadzoruje parlament zadevne države, njena civilna družba pa je o vsem obveščena,
whereas making a partner government publicly accountable for its budgetary management is an essential factor in the country's capacity building process through the exercise of scrutiny by its parliament and the provision of information to civil society in the field of public finance,
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije iz zelene knjige o proračunski podpori, katere namen je predvsem spodbuditi endogeni razvoj partnerskih držav, in poziva, naj se razkrijejo številni primeri neustrezne porabe in tratenja proračunskih sredstev na račun davkoplačevalcev v zadnjih nekaj letih, ki so večinoma ostali nekaznovani, ter naj se jih tudi v prihodnje neodvisno oceni in primerno kaznuje (na primer s sorazmernim znižanjem prihodnjih plačil);
Welcomes the Commission's initiative through the Green Paper on budget support, which is aimed principally at promoting the development of partner countries from within, and calls for the budget support eligibility criteria to be clarified with a view to avoiding any loss of control over or misuse of this type of assistance, with due account being taken of factors such as the corruption index ratings for the countries concerned;
pozdravlja postopek posvetovanj na evropski ravni; upa, da bo praksa dodeljevanja proračunske podpore objektivno analizirana in izboljšana, da bi se povečala njena učinkovitost;
Welcomes the European-level consultation process; hopes that budget support award practice will be objectively analysed and improved in order to increase its effectiveness;
opozarja, da je v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo zmanjšanje in izkoreninjenje revščine glavni cilj razvojne politike Evropske unije; poudarja, da ima revščina več razsežnosti, kot so človeška, ekonomska, socialna, kulturna, politična, okoljska ter razsežnost glede na spol, vse pa mora obravnavati razvojna politika Unije;
Recalls that, according to the Lisbon Treaty, poverty reduction and eradication is the EU's primary development policy objective; emphasises that poverty has multiple dimensions such as human, economic, socio-cultural, gender, environmental and political, which all need to be tackled by the EU development policy;
meni, da bi morala pomoč Evropske unije prispevati k dejanskim kakovostnim spremembam v partnerskih državah; priznava, da je proračunska podpora učinkovito orodje za doseganje tega cilja, če se uporablja skupaj z učinkovitim političnim in strateškim dialogom, pa tudi s pogojevanjem;
Is of the opinion that EU aid should generate real quality change in the partner countries and recognises budget support as an effective tool for achieving this goal, provided that, as well as implying conditionality, it is used alongside effective political and policy dialogue;
poudarja osrednjo in obvezno vlogo usklajenosti politik pri izvajanju razvojne politike z velikim učinkom; poleg tega poziva, naj se zunanja in varnostna politika EU osredotoči na spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic, miru in varnosti, ki so bistveni pogoji za trajnostni razvoj; poziva k bolj sistematičnim prizadevanjem za vključitev prilagajanja podnebnim spremembam ter ukrepov za zmanjšanje tveganja nesreč;
Emphasises the crucial and compulsory role of policy coherence in the implementation of a high-impact development policy; further calls for the EU foreign and security policy to focus on the promotion of democracy and human rights, peace and security, all key preconditions for sustainable development; calls for more systematic efforts to mainstream climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction measures;
meni, da obdavčevanje jamči neodvisen vir financiranja trajnostnega razvoja ter je pomembna vez med vladami in državljani v državah v razvoju; poziva, naj vzpostavitev izvedljivega finančnega upravljanja in obsežne davčne infrastrukture postane ena od najpomembnejših prednostnih nalog proračunske podpore; priporoča, naj politika proračunske pomoči vključuje tudi boj proti davčnim oazam, utaji davkov in nezakonitemu begu kapitala;
Takes the view that taxation guarantees an independent source of financing for sustainable development and provides an important link between the governments and citizens of developing countries; calls for the development of a viable fiscal administration and a comprehensive tax infrastructure to be made one of the highest priorities of budget support; recommends that budget support policy should incorporate measures to combat tax havens, tax evasion and illicit capital flight;
poudarja, da je sektorsko proračunsko podporo treba po potrebi bolj ciljno uporabiti za pomoč osnovnim socialnim sektorjem, med drugim za zdravstvo, izobraževanje, pomoč najbolj ranljivim osebam ter zlasti invalidom;
Stresses the need to use sectoral budget support wherever appropriate in order to ensure better targeting of basic social sectors, particularly health, education and assistance for the most vulnerable groups, especially persons with disabilities;
poudarja, da se proračunska podpora ne sme uporabljati za krepitev posebnih gospodarskih in strateških interesov Evropske unije, temveč za doseganje razvojnih ciljev držav v razvoju, za pomoč tem državam, da jih uresničijo, zlasti pri izkoreninjenju revščine in lakote;
Points out that budget support must not be used to reinforce the EU's particular economic and strategic interests, but to reach development objectives of and for developing countries, especially to eradicate poverty and hunger;
opozarja, da je na področju proračunske podpore vloga Evropska unija inovativna, ter poudarja dodano vrednost Evropske komisije kot izvedenca na tem področju;
Draws attention to the innovative role played by the EU in the field of budget support and the added value which the Commission brings, owing to its expertise in this area;