natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj tesno sodeluje s Svetom, da bi razvila pristno in skupno proračunsko in računovodsko nomenklaturo;
Asks the Commission to work in close cooperation with the Council in order to develop a genuine and common budget and accounting nomenclature;
opozarja, da bi moral Svet javno utemeljiti svoje stališče v sklopu gospodarskega dialoga v Parlamentu, kadar bistveno odstopa od priporočil in predlogov Komisije;
Recalls the fact that the Council should explain its position publicly as part of the economic dialogue in Parliament when it diverges significantly from Commission recommendations and proposals;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da morajo priporočila in predlogi Komisije spoštovati in ohranjati politično diskrecijsko pravico držav članic, potrebno za izvajanje v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti in določili člena 126 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, saj lahko k doseganju priporočenih ciljev privedejo različni ukrepi;
Stresses in this regard that the Commission recommendations and proposals must respect and preserve Member State policy discretion required for implementation in conformity with the principle of subsidiarity and the provisions of Article 126 TFEU, as several means can be conducive to the attainment of the goals and targets recommended;
poziva Komisijo, naj temeljito pojasni, zakaj je negativno ocenila nacionalne programe reform ali programe stabilnosti in konvergence ter druge dokumente, ki so jih vložile države članice v okviru gospodarskega upravljanja; pričakuje, da bo pri tem zadevnim državam članicam posredovala natančno metodologijo in delovno hipotezo, ki podpirata njeno oceno;
Urges the Commission to explain thoroughly the reason why it assessed negatively the National Reform Programme (NRP) or Stability and Convergence Programme (SCP) and any other document the Member States have submitted in the economic governance framework; expects that, in doing so, the Commission will provide the Member State concerned with its detailed methodology and the working hypothesis underpinning its assessment;
opominja, da novi pravni okvir določa, da mora biti Evropski parlament ustrezno vključen v evropski semester, s čimer naj bi se izboljšala preglednost in odgovornost za sprejete odločitve, zlasti na podlagi gospodarskega dialoga, kot je določeno v zadevni sekundarni zakonodaji;
Recalls that the new legal framework stipulates that the European Parliament is to be duly involved in the European Semester in order to increase the transparency and accountability of the decisions taken, in particular by means of the economic dialogue as specified in the relevant secondary legislation;
čestita Komisiji za objavo letnega pregleda rasti do konca novembra ter pričakuje, da bo tudi vnaprej tako, saj ima s tem tudi sam dovolj časa, da svoja stališča izrazi pred sprejetjem letnih smernic na spomladanskem srečanju Evropskega sveta;
Applauds the Commission for having published its Annual Growth Survey by the end of November and expects this schedule to be made permanent so that Parliament has time enough to express its views before annual guidelines are decided upon by the Spring European Council;
poudarja, da v skladu s členom 121 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije predsednika Sveta in Komisije ter po potrebi tudi predsednik evroskupine letno poročajo Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu svetu o izidih večstranskega nadzora;
Underlines the fact that the President of the Council, the Commission, in accordance with Article 121 TFEU, and, where appropriate, the President of the Eurogroup are to report annually to the European Parliament and the European Council on the results of multilateral surveillance;
poziva Komisijo, Svet in Evropski svet, naj se s Parlamentom dogovorijo o usklajenem časovnem razporedu za evropski semester, da bi bil čim bolj učinkovit, pregleden in legitimen;
Urges the Commission, the Council and the European Council to agree with Parliament on a streamlined timetable for the European Semester in order to make it as effective, transparent and legitimate as possible;
pooblašča svojega predsednika, da zagovarja to stališče med spomladanskim zasedanjem Evropskega sveta (od 1. do 2. marca 2012);
Mandates its President to defend this position during the Spring European Council (1-2 March 2012);
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter Evropskemu svetu.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the European Council.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. februarja 2012 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sistemih zajamčenih vlog (prenovitev) ( COM(2010)0368 – C7-0177/2010 – 2010/0207(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 February 2012 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Deposit Guarantee Schemes (recast) ( COM(2010)0368 – C7-0177/2010 – 2010/0207(COD) )
(Redni zakonodajni postopek – prenovitev)
(Ordinary legislative procedure: recast)
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2010)0368 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0368 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 294(2) in 53(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija ta predlog podala Parlamentu ( C7-0177/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 53(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0177/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju obrazloženih mnenj o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki so jih v okviru Protokola št. 2 predložili danski parlament, oba domova nemškega parlamenta in švedski parlament, v katerih trdijo, da se osnutek zakonodajnega akta ne sklada z načelom subsidiarnosti,
having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of Protocol (No 2) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Danish Parliament, the German Bundestag, the German Bundesrat and the Swedish Parliament, , asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske centralne banke z dne 16. februarja 2011 UL C 99, 31.3.2011, str.
having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank of 16 February 2011 OJ C 99, 31.3.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za pravne zadeve z dne 24. februarja 2011, naslovljenega na Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve v skladu s členom 87(3) Poslovnika,
having regard to the letter of 24 February 2011 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs in accordance with Rule 87(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenj odborov za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter za pravne zadeve( A7-0225/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0225/2011 ),
sprejme stališče v prvi obravnavi, kakor je določeno v nadaljevanju in kakor je bilo prilagojeno v skladu s predlogi posvetovalne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
Da bi olajšali začetek opravljanja in opravljanje dejavnosti kreditnih institucij, je treba odstraniti razlike med zakonodajami posameznih držav članic
In order to make it easier to take up and pursue the business of credit institutions, it is necessary to eliminate differences between the laws of the Member States
, ki lahko izkrivljajo trg
which may distort markets
glede pravil o sistemih zajamčenih vlog, ki jih morajo te institucije upoštevati.
as regards the rules on Deposit Guarantee Schemes to which these institutions are subject.
Da bi v prihodnosti preprečili terjatve do sistemov zajamčenih vlog, se je treba osredotočiti na preventivne ukrepe in nadzor, s čimer bi zagotovili usklajeno in pregledno oceno poslovnih modelov novih in obstoječih akterjev na podlagi skupnega pristopa, o katerem se dogovorijo Evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski bančni organ), ustanovljen z uredbo (EU) št. 1093/2010 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
In order to prevent future claims on Deposit Guarantee Schemes, there should be a strong focus on preventive action and supervision, ensuring a coordinated and transparent assessment of the business models of new and existing players, based on a common approach agreed between the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(EBA) ter pristojni organi, posledica česar bi lahko bile dodatne nadzorne zahteve, omejitve dejavnosti, obvezne spremembe poslovnih modelov ali celo izključitev kreditnih institucij, ki se neodgovorno izpostavljajo tveganjem.
(EBA) and the competent authorities, potentially resulting in additional supervisory requirements, limitations on activities, mandatory changes to the business model, or even exclusion of credit institutions that take irresponsible risks.
Zaradi skupnih stroškov, ki jih propad kreditne institucije prinese za gospodarstvo, in negativnega učinka na finančno stabilnost ter zaupanja vlagateljev bi bilo treba poleg izključne naloge izplačevanja zajamčenih vlog za vlagatelje ustvariti dovolj prožnosti tudi za to, da bodo lahko sistemi zajamčenih vlog izvedli preventivne in podporne ukrepe.
In view of the costs to the economy as a whole of the failure of a credit institution and the adverse impact on financial stability and the confidence of depositors, it is desirable not only to make provision for reimbursing depositors but also to create sufficient flexibility to enable Deposit Guarantee Schemes to implement prevention and support measures.
Ker v tem primeru pridružene kreditne institucije same krijejo stroške sistema zajamčenih vlog, obstajajo ustrezne spodbude za zgodnje prepoznavanje težav v pridruženih kreditnih institucijah ter za preprečitev nevarnih primerov glede jamstva z ustreznimi ukrepi, kot so pogoji glede prestrukturiranja.
As in this case, the affiliated credit institutions themselves cover the costs of Deposit Guarantee Schemes, appropriate incentives exist to identify problems in the affiliated credit institutions at an early stage and to forestall impending guarantee cases by means of appropriate measures such as conditions concerning restructuring.
Sistemi zajamčenih vlog, ki lahko delujejo tudi preventivno, so zaradi tega pomembna dopolnitev ukrepanju nadzornih organov pri vsakodnevnem nadzoru in v okviru redne likvidacije kreditnih institucij.
Deposit Guarantee Schemes which can also take preventive action therefore constitute an important complement to action by the supervisory authorities in day-to-day supervision and in the context of the orderly winding-up of credit institutions.
Vendar bi morali za podporne ukrepe, ki jih zagotavljajo sistemi zajamčenih vlog, vedno veljati nekateri pogoji, njihovo ukrepanje pa bi moralo biti v skladu s konkurenčnim pravom.
Support measures provided by Deposit Guarantee Schemes should, however, always be subject to conditions, and their actions should always comply with competition law.
Ustrezne spodbude za učinkovito ukrepanje sistemov zajamčenih vlog obstajajo zlasti, kadar gre za največje možno ujemanje med njihovim področjem pristojnosti in področjem, za katerega se nosijo stroški propada kreditne institucije.
Appropriate incentives for effective action by Deposit Guarantee Schemes particularly exist if there is the maximum possible correspondence between their field of competence and the area in which the costs of failure of a credit institution are borne.
Da bi upoštevali naraščajoče povezovanje notranjega trga, bi bilo zato treba omogočiti povezavo med sistemi zajamčenih vlog različnih držav članic ali ustvariti ločene prostovoljne čezmejne sisteme.
In order to take account of the growing integration of the internal market, therefore, it should be possible to merge the Deposit Guarantee Schemes of different Member States or to create separate cross-border schemes on a voluntary basis.
Preprečiti je treba negativne učinke na finančno stabilnost, na primer kadar bi bilo zajetih več kreditnih institucij z visokim tveganjem, ki bi v lastnem sistemu zajamčenih vlog predstavljale zgolj povprečno tveganje, prispevki pa bi bili odvzeti iz obstoječih jamstvenih sistemov.
Adverse effects on financial stability, for example where several high-risk credit institutions are covered which, within their own Deposit Guarantee Scheme, would only present an average risk while contributions would be withdrawn from the existing guarantee schemes, must be avoided.
Direktiva 94/19/ES temelji na načelu minimalnega usklajevanja.
Directive 94/19/EC was based on the principle of minimum harmonisation.
v Uniji
in the Union.
izkrivljanje trga
market distortions
notranjega trga
Internal Market
za vlagatelje
for depositors
Poleg tega je izjemno pomembno izvajanje teh skupnih zahtev za sisteme zajamčenih vlog, da bi odpravili
At the same time, the implementation of these common requirements for Deposit Guarantee Schemes is of utmost importance in order to eliminate
Možnost, da bi preprečili propad kreditne institucije z ustreznimi ukrepi sistemov zajamčenih vlog, bi morala ščititi zaupanje v finančno stabilnost in biti v interesu zasebnih vlagateljev, lokalnih organov, ki potrebujejo zaščito, ter predvsem malih in srednjih podjetij.
The possibility of preventing failure of a credit institution by means of appropriate measures adopted by the Deposit Guarantee Scheme should protect confidence in financial stability and should be in the interests of private depositors, local authorities that are in need of protection and, above all, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Čeprav so načeloma vse kreditne institucije članice sistema zajamčenih vlog, je treba priznati obstoj shem, ki ščitijo samo kreditno institucijo (institucionalna jamstvena shema) ter zlasti zagotavljajo njeno likvidnost in solventnost.
Although, in principle, all credit institutions should be members of a Deposit Guarantee Scheme, it should be recognised that there are systems which protect the credit institution itself (Institutional Protection Schemes) and, in particular, ensure its liquidity and solvency.
Vse kreditne institucije bi morale biti vključene v sistem zajamčenih vlog, ki ga priznava direktiva, s čimer se zagotovijo visoka stopnja zaščite potrošnikov in enaki konkurenčni pogoji za kreditne institucije ter prepreči zakonodajna konkurenca.
Each credit institution should be part of a Deposit Guarantee Scheme recognised under this Directive, thereby ensuring a high level of consumer protection and a level playing field between credit institutions, as well as preventing regulatory competition.
Glavna naloga sistema zajamčenih vlog je zaščita vlagateljev pred posledicami nesolventnosti kreditne institucije.
The key task of a Deposit Guarantee Scheme is to protect depositors against the consequences of the insolvency of a credit institution.
Sistemi zajamčenih vlog bi morali biti zmožni to zaščito zagotavljati na različne načine.
Deposit Guarantee Schemes should be able to provide this protection in various ways.
Zato bi morali biti na eni strani spektra delovanja sistemov zajamčenih vlog sistemi z izključno nalogo izplačevanja (angl. „paybox“).
At one end of the range of activities of Deposit Guarantee Schemes, therefore, schemes with a pure reimbursement (‘paybox’) function should be possible.
Sistemom zajamčenih vlog bi moralo biti omogočeno tudi, da presežejo izključno nalogo izplačevanja, in sicer z zahtevo, da morajo pridružene kreditne institucije priskrbeti dodatne informacije, na podlagi katerih bi ustvarili sistem zgodnjega opozarjanja.
It should also, however, be possible for Deposit Guarantee Schemes to go beyond a pure reimbursement function by requiring affiliated credit institutions to supply additional information and, on that basis, to build up early warning systems.
Tako bi lahko prispevke na podlagi tveganj dovolj zgodaj prilagodili ali predlagali preventivne ukrepe za prepoznana tveganja.
In this way, risk-dependent contributions can be adjusted at an early stage, or preventive measures against recognised risks can be proposed.
V primeru grozečih neravnovesij bi se moral sistem zajamčenih vlog odločiti o podpornih ukrepih ali imeti možnost, da svoja sredstva uporabi za redno likvidacijo problematičnih kreditnih institucij, da bi preprečil stroške povračil vlagateljem ter druge negativne učinke nesolventnosti.
In the event of impending imbalances, Deposit Guarantee Schemes should be able to decide on support measures or to use their resources in support of orderly winding-up of problematic credit institutions in order to avoid the costs of reimbursing depositors and the other adverse impacts of insolvency.
Na drugi strani spektra delovanja sistemov zajamčenih vlog bi za slednje morala obstajati možnost, da prevzamejo obliko institucionalne jamstvene sheme, kot je opredeljeno v členu 80(8) Direktive 2006/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti kreditnih institucij
At the other end of the range of activities of Deposit Guarantee Schemes, it should be possible to take the form of an institutional protection scheme, as referred to in Article 80(8) of Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions
Institucionalne jamstvene sheme ščitijo kreditno institucijo samo ter zlasti zagotavljajo njeno likvidnost in solventnost.
Institutional protection schemes protect the credit institution itself, in particular by ensuring its liquidity and solvency.
Pristojni organi bi jih morali priznati kot sisteme zajamčenih vlog, če izpolnjujejo vsa merila iz člena 80(8) Direktive 2006/48/ES in iz te direktive.
They should be recognised as Deposit Guarantee Schemes by the competent authorities if they fulfil all the criteria laid down in Article 80(8) of Directive 2006/48/EC and in this Directive.
S temi merili se zagotovi zlasti, da je kot v drugih sistemih zajamčenih vlog vedno na razpolago dovolj sredstev za morebitne primere izplačila.
Those criteria ensure, in particular, that, as in other Deposit Guarantee Schemes, sufficient resources are always available for a potential repayment.
UL L 177, 30.6.2009, str.
OJ L 177, 30.6.2006, p.
Institucionalne jamstvene sheme so opredeljene v členu 80(8) Direktive 2006/48/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti kreditnih institucij (prenova)
Institutional protection schemes are defined in Article 80(8) of Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of business of credit institutions (recast)
in jih pristojni organi lahko priznajo kot sisteme zajamčenih vlog, če izpolnjujejo vse pogoje iz omenjenega člena in te direktive.
and may be recognized as Deposit Guarantee Schemes by the competent authorities if they fulfil all criteria laid down in that Article and in this Directive.
Med nedavno finančno krizo je neusklajeno povečanje stopenj kritja po vsej
In the recent financial crisis, uncoordinated increases in the coverage levels across the
povzročilo, da so vlagatelji prenašali denar na banke v državah, kjer so bile zajamčene vloge višje.
led to depositors shifting money to banks in countries where deposit guarantees were higher.
V času stabilnosti se lahko zgodi, da se vlagatelji zaradi različnih stopenj kritja odločijo za najvišje zaščiteno vlogo, ne pa za
In times of stability, different coverage levels may lead to depositors choosing the highest deposit protection rather than the
v nekaterih primerih
have in some cases
povzročilo, da so vlagatelji prenašali denar v banke v državah, kjer so bile zajamčene vloge višje.
led to depositors shifting money to banks in countries where deposit guarantees were higher.
V času stabilnosti se lahko zgodi, da se vlagatelji zaradi različnih stopenj kritja odločijo za najvišje zaščiteno vlogo, ne pa za proizvod
In times of stability, different coverage levels may lead to depositors choosing the highest deposit protection rather than the deposit product
, ki je zanje najprimernejši
best suited to them
pri vseh priznanih sistemih zajamčenih vlog
by all recognised Deposit Guarantee Schemes,
zagotoviti skladno raven zaščite vlog ne glede na to, kje v Uniji so locirane.
wherever deposits are located in the Union.
V času finančne krize se je izkazalo, da obstoječi sistemi zajamčenih vlog ne zmorejo obvladati vseh izgub, da bi tako zaščitili vlagatelje.
During the financial crisis, existing Deposit Guarantee Schemes proved to be unable to carry all losses in such a way as to protect depositors.
Kadar je to potrebno, morajo imeti sistemi zajamčenih vlog urejene ustrezne alternativne finančne dogovore, s pomočjo katerih si zagotovijo kratkoročno financiranje, potrebno za plačilo terjatev do njih.
Where necessary, Deposit Guarantee Schemes should have adequate alternative funding arrangements in place to enable them to obtain short-term funding to meet claims made against them.
se mora
The same
stopnja kritja
coverage level
, ne glede na to, ali je v državi članici valuta euro
should apply to all depositors regardless of whether a Member State's currency is the Euro or not
in ne glede na to, ali je banka članica sistema, ki ščiti samo kreditno institucijo
and regardless of whether a bank is a member of a system which protects the credit institution itself
Za vse vlagatelje
The same
Države članice, katerih valuta ni euro, bi morale imeti možnost, da zneske po valutni pretvorbi zaokrožijo, pri čemer pa ne smejo ogroziti enake zaščite vlagateljev.
should have the possibility to round off the amounts resulting from the conversion without compromising the equivalent protection of depositors.
zajamčenih vlog.
Deposit Guarantee Schemes.
zajamčenih vlog.
for a given period
Nujno je treba uskladiti postopke za financiranje jamstvenih sistemov ali samih kreditnih institucij.
It is indispensable to harmonize the methods of financing schemes guaranteeing deposits or credit institutions themselves.
bi se zagotovilo
be proportionate to their liabilities.
, da imajo vsi vlagatelji
In order to ensure that
podobno visoko
In order to ensure that
stabilnost sistemov zajamčenih vlog
Deposit Guarantee Schemes
, bi morali za vse sisteme zajamčenih vlog predvideti enoten predhodni cilj finančnega kritja
stability, a uniform ex ante financial target level should be stipulated for all Deposit Guarantee Schemes
Določeni vlagatelji ne bi smeli biti upravičeni do zaščite vlog, zlasti javni organi ali druge finančne institucije.
Certain depositors should not be eligible for deposit protection, in particular public authorities or other financial institutions.
sistemov zajamčenih vlog bi se načeloma morala uporabljati
of Deposit Guarantee Schemes should principally be used
za izplačila vlagateljem.
for the repayment of depositors.
, v primeru, da stroški, ki jih nosi sistem zajamčenih vlog, ne
credit institution, provided that the costs borne by the Deposit Guarantee Scheme
zneska kritih vlog pri zadevni kreditni instituciji.
exceed the amount of covered deposits at the credit institution concerned.
v bodočo politiko Komisije v zvezi z ustanovitvijo nacionalnih reševalnih skladov za banke.
without prejudice to the future Commission policy concerning the establishment of national bank resolution funds.
Sistemi zajamčenih vlog bi morali imeti zadostna
Deposit Guarantee Schemes should have sufficient
V mnogih primerih pa je treba za preprečitev propada kreditne institucije izvajati podporne ukrepe, saj imajo tovrstni ukrepi pri jamčenju vlog pogosto ugodnejši učinek kot izplačilo vlagateljem.
In many cases, however, support measures should be taken to avert the insolvency of a credit institution since such measures are often more effective than reimbursement of depositors in guaranteeing deposits.