natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva k sprejetju odgovornega proračuna, usmerjenega k rezultatom, s kakovostno porabo ter optimalno in pravočasno uporabo obstoječih sredstev EU; v duhu izjave članov Evropskega sveta z dne 30. januarja 2012 poudarja, da je treba vlagati v rast in delovna mesta, zlasti v zvezi z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji ter mladino; poudarja, da namerava skupaj s specializiranimi parlamentarnimi odbori opredeliti tako konkretna področja, kjer so potrebni dodatni ukrepi, kot tudi morebitne negativne prednostne naloge;
Calls for the adoption of a responsible and result-oriented budget, based on good-quality spending and optimal and timely use of existing EU financing; in the spirit of the statement of 30 January 2012 by the Members of the European Council; emphasises the need to invest in growth and jobs, especially in terms of SMEs and young people; underlines its intention of engaging, together with the specialised parliamentary committees, not only in the identification of concrete areas where actions need to be strengthened, but also in identifying possible negative priorities;
poudarja, da proračun EU predstavlja naložbo, usmerjeno izključno v politike in ukrepe, ki prinašajo dodano vrednost EU; opozarja, da ima proračun EU – ki ne sme imeti primanjkljaja – veliko večji učinek vzvoda na rast in zaposlovanje kot pa nacionalni proračuni, prav tako pa lahko pospeši naložbe, zagotovi stabilnost v Evropi in EU pomaga pri izhodu iz gospodarske in finančne krize; kljub temu poudarja, da je treba spodbuditi nove naložbe, da ne bodo ogroženi projekti, ključni za gospodarsko okrevanje in konkurenčnost; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da bi lahko razvoj novih in izboljšanih finančnih instrumentov še povečal učinek vzvoda, ki ga ima poraba EU na rast, tako da se pritegnejo zasebne naložbe, s čimer se nadomestijo omejitve na nacionalni ravni in optimizira javna poraba;
Stresses that the EU budget represents an investment solely directed towards policies and actions demonstrating EU added value; draws attention to the fact that the EU budget – which cannot run into deficit – has a leverage effect on growth and employment much higher than that of national spending, as does its capacity to gear up investment, deliver stability in Europe and help the EU out of the current economic and financial crisis; underlines, however, the need to leverage more investments in order not to endanger key projects for economic recovery and competitiveness; highlights, in this context, the fact that developing new and improved financial instruments could further enhance the leverage effect of EU spending's contribution to growth, by attracting private investment, thus compensating for constraints at national level and optimising public spending;
opominja, da so se nacionalni proračuni v EU med letoma 2000 in 2011 v povprečju povečali za 62 %, plačila v proračun EU pa so narasla za nekoliko manj kot 42 %, pri čemer se je EU razširila s 15 na 27 držav članic;
Recalls that between 2000 and 2011, national budgets in the EU increased on average by 62% while EU budget payments increased by slightly less than 42%, whereas the EU grew from 15 to 27 Member States;
se namerava v proračunskem postopku za leto 2013 še posebej osredotočiti na uresničevanje proračunskih prednostnih nalog EP iz prejšnjih let ter pozorno spremljati financiranje in izvajanje strategije Evropa 2020, ki so jo države članice v celoti sprejele, kar zadeva spodbujanje konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja, pa tudi drugih sektorskih prednostnih nalog;
Will pay specific attention, in the context of the 2013 budgetary procedure, to the implementation of the EP's previous years' budgetary priorities and will, in particular, follow closely the funding and implementation of the Europe 2020 Strategy, which is fully endorsed by Member States, in terms of promoting competitiveness and employment, as well as of its other sectoral priorities;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija v zadnji različici finančnega načrta za obdobje 2012–2013 upoštevala proračunske prednostne naloge EP za leto 2012 in ni izravnala preteklih povečanj; poziva jo, naj v predlogu proračuna za leto 2013 naredi enako;
Welcomes the fact that the in the latest version of the financial programming for 2012-13 the Commission respected the EP's 2012 budgetary priorities, as it did in 2011, by not offsetting past increases; asks for the 2013 draft budget to follow the same line;
opominja, da zgornje meje za več razdelkov, zlasti razdelek 1a (konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje ) in razdelek 4 (EU kot globalni akter) v trenutnem finančnem okviru ne zadostujejo za uresničevanje politik, ki so jih Parlament, Svet in Komisija opredelili kot prednostne; znova opozarja, da je bilo treba sredstva, dodeljena nekaterim politikam, večkrat revidirati, da bi bilo mogoče uresničiti nove cilje in naloge, zaradi česar je bilo treba skoraj v vseh letnih proračunih uporabiti instrument prilagodljivosti; poudarja, da ne bo dopustil, da bi bile dolgoletne politične zaveze EU ogrožene; zlasti opozarja, da morajo biti finančne obveznosti, sprejete z mednarodnimi sporazumi in/ali sporazumi med EU in mednarodnimi organizacijami, spoštovane in ustrezno vključene v predlog proračuna;
Recalls that the ceilings for several headings, in particular Heading 1a (competitiveness for growth and jobs) and Heading 4 (the EU as a global actor) within the current financial framework are insufficient to meet the policies approved as priorities by Parliament, the Council and the Commission; recalls, moreover, that the appropriations allocated for some policies have had to be revised several times in order to meet new goals and tasks, making the use of the Flexibility Instrument necessary in almost every annual budget; stresses that it will not accept longstanding EU political commitments being jeopardised; recalls, in particular, that financial commitments entered into in international agreements and/or agreements between the EU and international organisations should be respected and duly included in the draft budget;
Proračun za leto 2013, usmerjen v uresničevanje programov in prednostnih nalog Unije
A 2013 budget oriented towards fulfilling the Union's programmes and priorities
opominja, da je bil večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 oblikovan zato, da bi povečali blaginjo in kakovost življenja državljanov ter izkoristili ves potencial širitve, kljub temu pa se EU od leta 2008 sooča s krizo brez primere, ki je vplivala tudi na vse letne proračune; glede na to poudarja, da finančni okvir za obdobje 2007–2013 ni bil spremenjen, tako da bi upoštevali dodatne finančne potrebe, nastale zaradi sedanje krize, ampak nasprotno, da je bila v vseh letnih proračunih od leta 2007 skupna razlika do zgornje meje precejšnja ter da so bili torej zato vsi letni proračuni omejeni in varčni; poudarja, da bi morala biti ustrezajoča plačila zato vsaj izplačana v skladu z običajnim proračunskim ciklom; opominja, da so v primeru večletnih programov plačila od prevzetih obveznosti ločena samo zaradi časovnega zamika med prevzetjem obveznosti in dejanskim izplačilom sredstev;
Recalls that the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2007-2013 was designed to improve the prosperity and quality of life of our citizens and to exploit all the potential of enlargement, yet since 2008 the EU has experienced an unprecedented crisis, which has also impacted on each of the annual budgets; underlines, against this background, the fact that the 2007-2013 financial framework was not revised to accommodate additional financing needs stemming from the current crisis but that, on the contrary, substantial global margins have been left under the overall ceilings in every annual budget since 2007 and that, to that extent, all the annual budgets have been contained and austere; stresses that the corresponding payments should therefore at least be disbursed according to the normal budget cycle; recalls that payments are dissociated from commitment appropriations only because of the time lag, in the case of multiannual programmes, before the actual disbursement of the funds;
poudarja, da je leto 2013 zadnje leto trenutnega programskega obdobja in da bo treba izplačati še preostale neporavnane obveznosti, kar je v navadi ob koncu vsake finančne perspektive, saj se bodo programi iz obdobja 2007–2013 zaključevali, prav tako pa bo treba upoštevati zneske obveznosti iz finančnega načrta, ki znašajo skoraj 152 milijard EUR za leto 2013; ponavlja, da bi morebitno umetno krčenje plačil povzročilo zamude pri izpolnjevanju pogodbenih obveznosti in sprejetih zavez EU, zaradi česar bi utegnile nastati zamudne obresti, zaupanje v evropske politike in verodostojnost institucij EU pa bi usahnilo; zato poudarja, da je treba pogodbene dolgove plačati čim prej, saj gre za vprašanje proračunske discipline;
Stresses that, 2013 being the last year of the current programming period, catching up will be necessary in terms of payments, as has always been the case at the end of financial perspectives, owing to the start of the completion process for the 2007-2013 programmes, and, in terms of commitments, in order to respect the financial programming amounts, which are close to EUR 152 billion for 2013; reiterates that any artificial cut made to the level of payments will delay meeting both contractual obligations and past EU commitments, and could also result in late interest being due and loss of confidence in European policies and the EU institutions' credibility; underlines, therefore, that contractual debts should be paid as soon as possible as a matter of budgetary discipline;
ugotavlja, da je bila raven plačil, ki izhajajo izključno iz prevzetih obveznosti in bi jih morali zato določiti na podlagi tehničnih meril, kot so stopnja izvrševanja, napovedi črpanja in raven neporavnanih obveznosti, v prejšnjih proračunskih postopkih osrednje politično sporno vprašanje med Svetom in Parlamentom; opozarja na povečano raven neporavnanih obveznosti ob koncu leta 2011, saj so znašale 207 milijard EUR, kar je skoraj 7 % več kot ob koncu leta 2010; glede na prihodnje medinstitucionalno srečanje o razliki med sprejetimi obveznostmi in plačili napoveduje, da bo začel dialog s Komisijo, da se docela pojasni sestava neporavnanih proračunskih obveznosti; vztraja, naj Svet ne odloča vnaprej o ravni plačil, ne da bi upošteval dejanske potrebe in pravne obveznosti; nadalje ugotavlja, da kopičenje neporavnanih obveznosti spodkopava preglednost proračuna EU, saj ni povsem jasno, kakšne so povezave med obveznostmi in plačili v posameznem proračunskem letu;
Notes that the level of payments, which, being the mere result of past commitments, should be determined on the basis of technical criteria such as implementation figures, absorption forecasts or the level of outstanding commitments (RAL), has become the main political issue within the Council in the past few budgetary procedures; points to the growing level of RAL at the end of 2011, amounting to EUR 207 billion, which represents almost 7% more than the level at the end of 2010; in view of the upcoming interinstitutional meeting on the difference between commitment and payment appropriations will establish a dialogue with the Commission in order to fully clarify how the RAL is composed; insists that the Council refrain from deciding a priori the level of payments without taking account of actual needs and legal obligations; notes further that accruing RAL actually undermines a transparent EU budget in which it is clearly visible how commitments and payments are related in a specific budgetary year;
poudarja, da pristop „neto plačnic v proračun EU/neto prejemnic iz proračuna EU“ sam po sebi ne upošteva dovolj zelo ugodnih posrednih učinkov, ki jih proračun EU ustvarja med državami članicami v korist skupnih političnih ciljev EU; je resno zaskrbljen zaradi zelo majhnega povečanja plačil v zadnjih dveh proračunih – v proračunu za leto 2012 to povečanje niti ni doseglo inflacije – v ključnem obdobju, ko bi bilo treba izvajati s polno paro vse naložbene programe in izkoristiti njihov celotni potencial;
Underlines the fact that a pure ‘net EU budget contributor/net EU budget beneficiary’ approach does not take due account of the great positive spill-over effects the EU budget produces between EU countries to the benefit of common EU policy goals; is deeply concerned at the very moderate increases in payments in the last two budgets, which in the case of the 2012 budget were even below the level of inflation, at a crucial time when all the investment programmes should be running at full speed and unfolding their full potential;
poudarja, da je treba v skladu z dobrim finančnim poslovodenjem preprečiti, da bi bila dodeljena nezadostna proračunska sredstva, in da morajo slednja ustrezati stvarnim napovedim zmogljivosti črpanja; opozarja, da bi umetno zmanjševanje proračunskih sredstev, ki jih je realistično predvidela Komisija, lahko povzročilo, da dokončna stopnja proračunskega izvrševanja ne bo tako visoka, kot bi lahko bila; opominja, da je raven sredstev za plačila, ki jih Komisija predvidi v predlogu proračuna, odvisna predvsem od napovedi držav članic in njihovih zmogljivosti za izvrševanje, saj skupaj s Komisijo soupravljajo več kot 80 % sredstev EU;
Stresses that under-budgeting should be avoided as a matter of sound financial management, and that appropriations need to be aligned to realistic estimates of absorption capacity; points out that artificially lowering the level of appropriations as against the Commission's realistic estimates may, conversely, prevent the final level of budgetary implementation from reaching its full potential; recalls that the level of payment appropriations proposed by the Commission in its draft budget is determined mainly by the Member States' own forecasts and their implementation capacity, since Member States co-manage, together with the Commission, more than 80% of EU funding;
obžaluje dejstvo, da je Svet decembra 2011 zavrnil financiranje opredeljenih dodatnih potreb in da zato konec leta 2011 ni bilo mogoče ugoditi zahtevkom za plačila v znesku več kot 10 milijard EUR, kar bo imelo neposredne posledice za razpoložljiva plačila v letu 2012; je zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, da je ta situacija nastala, ker je Svet podvomil o podatkih o izvrševanju in o ocenah potreb, ki jih je pripravila Komisija, ne da bi predložil druge podatke ali vire;
Regrets the fact that, while the Council refused in December 2011 to finance identified additional needs, some payment claims amounting to more than EUR 10 billion could not be honoured in late 2011, which is now impacting directly on available 2012 payments; is concerned at the fact that this resulted from the Council's questioning of the Commission's implementation data and assessments of need without providing any alternative data or source;
je zato resno zaskrbljen zaradi plačil v letu 2012 in poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predlog, da se rešitev najde čim prej in še letos, da ne bo to vprašanje znova preloženo na leto 2013; poleg tega meni, da je uporaba sredstev za prihodnje leto za financiranje trenutnih potreb slabo finančno poslovodenje in da je v nasprotju z načelom enoletnosti; je resno zaskrbljen zaradi te prakse, ki spodkopava načelo ničelnega dolga Unije;
Is therefore extremely worried about the payments situation in 2012 and calls for the Commission to put forward proposals so that a solution can be found as early as possible this year, in order to avoid postponing the problem once again, to 2013; takes the view, moreover, that such use of the upcoming year's appropriations to fund current needs is bad financial management and infringes the principle of budget annuality; expresses serious concerns that this practice undermines the zero-debt principle of the Union;
znova poziva Svet, naj se med proračunskim postopkom vzdrži umetnega zmanjševanja plačil, in poudarja, da bi utegnila biti zaradi tega raven plačil neustrezna; zahteva, naj Svet, če bo že predlagal kaj takega, jasno in javno opredeli, katere programe in projekte EU bi bilo mogoče po njegovi oceni odložiti ali povsem opustiti, in svoje stališče tudi upraviči;
Reiterates its call for the Council to refrain from making artificial cuts in payments during the budgetary procedure, and stresses that this seems to be leading to an unsustainable level of payments; requests, in the event of such proposals being made, that the Council clearly and publicly identify and justify which of the EU's programmes or projects it believes could be delayed or dropped altogether;
v zvezi s tem poziva Svet, naj svoje stališče podredi stvarnemu in odgovornemu proračunskemu načrtovanju, ter se zavezuje, da bo v letu 2012 stalno spremljal izvrševanje proračunskih sredstev, še zlasti pa plačil; poziva Svet, naj stori enako, tako da bo lahko proračunski organ deloval na osnovi enotnih in posodobljenih podatkov o izvrševanju ter da bo lahko pripravil zanesljive napovedi odhodkov; v ta namen Svet in Komisijo vabi na medinstitucionalno srečanje na ustrezni politični ravni v prvi polovici leta 2012, na katerem naj bi razjasnili in rešili morebitne nesporazume glede podatkov o izvrševanju in ocenjenih potreb po plačilih ter skupaj ocenili situacijo v zvezi s plačili v proračunskih letih 2012 in 2013;
In this context, asks the Council to align its position to one of realistic and responsible budgeting, and undertakes to continue to monitor constantly the implementation of the 2012 appropriations and, in particular, payments; calls on the Council to follow suit, so that the budgetary authority can work on the basis of common, updated implementation data and make reliable estimates of expenditure; to this end, invites the Council and the Commission to an interinstitutional meeting to be held during the first semester of 2012 at an appropriate political level with a view to clarifying and settling any possible misunderstanding as to implementation figures and estimated payment needs and to jointly taking stock of the payments situation for the budget years 2012 and 2013;
opozarja na pomen financiranja evropskih organov za nadzor finančnih trgov (EBA, EIOPA in ESMA), da se omogoči neokrnjeno izvajanje finančne ureditve in da bodo lahko ti nadzorni organi preprečili nove krize; poudarja, da bi moralo biti financiranje teh nadzornih organov in njihove neodvisne pravne službe prednostna naloga proračuna;
Highlights the importance of funding the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA) to enable comprehensive delivery of the financial regulation agenda and supervisory structures to prevent future crises; stresses that funding for ESAs and independent legal services for them should be prioritised within the budget;
pozdravlja dogovor o financiranju dodatnih stroškov projekta ITER, dosežen decembra 2011; poziva Komisijo, naj v celoti upošteva skupne sklepe iz tega sporazuma in v predlogu proračuna za leto 2013 pripravi konkretne predloge za znesek 360 milijonov EUR, pri tem pa upošteva določbe finančne uredbe in Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 brez morebitnih nadaljnjih popravkov večletnega finančnega okvira zaradi projekta ITER; znova izraža trdno prepričanje, da zagotovitev 360 milijonov EUR v proračunu za leto 2013 ne bo ovirala uspešnega izvajanja drugih politik EU – zlasti tistih, ki prispevajo k doseganju ciljev strategije EU 2020 – v tem zadnjem letu programskega obdobja, in še posebej nasprotuje morebitnim prerazporeditvam, ki ogrožajo te proračunske prednostne naloge; poudarja, da je Komisija v finančnem načrtu v razdelku 1a predvidela razliko do zgornje meje v znesku 47 milijonov EUR, kar delno pokriva potrebe projekta ITER;
Welcomes the agreement reached on financing the additional costs of ITER in December 2011; urges the Commission to respect the joint conclusions in this agreement in their entirety and to make concrete proposals on the amount of EUR 360 million in the 2013 draft budget, making full use of the provisions laid down in the Financial Regulation and in the IIA of 17 May 2006 and excluding any further ITER-related revision of the MFF; reiterates its strong conviction that securing the amount of EUR 360 million in the 2013 budget should not impair the successful implementation of other EU policies, especially those that contribute to achieving the goals of the EU 2020 strategy during this last year of the programming period, and specifically opposes any redeployments infringing upon this budgetary priority; stresses that in its financial programming the Commission foresees a margin of EUR 47 million in Heading 1a, which partially covers the needs for ITER;
glede na bližnjo pridružitev Hrvaške 1. julija 2013 pričakuje, da bo sprememba večletnega finančnega okvira sprejeta hitro, v skladu s točko 29 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma („Prilagoditve finančnega okvira zaradi širitve“), in poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predlog za ustrezna dodatna sredstva, takoj ko bodo akt o pristopu ratificirale vse države članice; ponavlja, da je treba za pridružitev Hrvaške v drugi polovici leta 2013 predvideti ustrezna dodatna finančna sredstva iz novih virov, ne s prerazporeditvami;
Expects, in view of the upcoming accession of Croatia on 1 July 2013, that the revision of the MFF will be adopted swiftly, in line with Point 29 of the IIA (‘Adjustment of the financial framework to cater for enlargement’) and asks the Commission to present its proposal for the corresponding additional appropriations as soon as the Act of Accession has been ratified by all Member States; reiterates that the enlargement to include Croatia should be accompanied by appropriate additional funding with fresh money rather than redeployments for the second part of 2013;
je seznanjen s pismom komisarja za proračun in finančno načrtovanje z dne 23. januarja 2012, v katerem je ta izrazil pripravljenost Komisije, da že leta 2013 zmanjša število delovnih mest v kadrovskem načrtu za 1 %, ob ustreznem upoštevanju različnih učinkov v velikih, srednjih in majhnih generalnih direktoratih; namerava pozorno preučiti namero Komisije, da do leta 2018 zmanjša število zaposlenih v institucijah in organih EU za 5 % v primerjavi z letom 2013, in opozarja, da ta cilj velja za splošnega; opozarja, da ima vsaka sprememba kadrovskega načrta neposredne posledice za proračun in ne sme nikakor posegati v proračunska pooblastila Odbora za proračun in Evropskega parlamenta; meni, da je treba tako pri kratkoročnem kot pri dolgoročnem krčenju delovnih mest najprej opraviti oceno vpliva ter v celoti upoštevati tudi pravne obveznosti Unije in nove pristojnosti in obsežnejše naloge institucij, izhajajoče iz pogodb;
Takes note of the letter dated 23 January 2012 from the Commissioner for Budgets and Financial Programming expressing the Commission's willingness to reduce the number of posts in its establishment plans by 1% as early as 2013, taking carefully into account the different effects for large, medium-sized and small directorates-general; intends to closely examine the Commission's intention of reducing by 2018 the staffing level in EU institutions and bodies by 5% compared to 2013, and recalls that this is to be seen as an overall goal; recalls that any change to the establishment plan has a direct impact on the budget and should in no way compromise the budgetary prerogatives of the Committee on Budgets and of the European Parliament; considers that any short-term or long-term reduction in staff should be based on a prior impact assessment and take full account of, inter alia, the Union's legal obligations and the institutions' new competences and increased tasks arising from the treaties;
opozarja na pomen tesnega in konstruktivnega sodelovanja med institucijami skozi celoten postopek in potrjuje svojo pripravljenost, da polno prispeva k takšnemu sodelovanju v popolnem skladju z določbami PDEU; pričakuje, da bodo te smernice v proračunskem postopku in pri pripravi predloga proračuna v celoti upoštevane;
Recalls the importance of close and constructive interinstitutional cooperation throughout the procedure and reaffirms its willingness to contribute fully to such cooperation in full accordance with the provisions of the TFEU; expects the present guidelines to be taken fully into account during the budgetary procedure and in the preparation of the draft budget;