natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo za pridobitev tega pregleda in za pripravo ustreznih priporočil odgovorni ustrezni organi, pri čemer je treba zagotoviti, da se odgovornost za izvajanje vsakega postopka ne bo zmanjšala; priporoča prilagoditev upravljavskega okvira Komisije, da se omogoči boljši institucionalni pregled; bi bil hvaležen za pravočasno obveščanje o razvoju dogodkov v zvezi s tem;
Invites the Commission to make appropriate bodies responsible for obtaining this overview and for making appropriate recommendations whilst taking care not to reduce responsibility for the implementation of each process; recommends that the Commission's governance framework be adapted to allow for enhanced institutional overview; would appreciate being informed in a timely manner about developments in this matter;
poziva službo za notranjo revizijo, naj del svojih sredstev nameni preučitvi vprašanja, ali najpomembnejši generalni direktorati trošijo sredstva na učinkovit, gospodaren in uspešen način ter tako zaključi tekoče finančne revizije in revizije zakonitosti;
Invites the IAS to allocate part of its resources to an examination of whether the spending by the main DGs is efficient, economical and effective, thereby completing the current financial and compliance audits;
nadalje poziva službo za notranjo revizijo, naj opravi revizijo metodologije, ki jo je treba uporabiti pri pripravi ocenjevalnega poročila iz člena 318 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in pri ocenjevanju opravljenega dela;
Further invites the IAS to audit the methodology to be used for the production of the Article 318 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union evaluation report and to assess the work done;
odločno poziva k uvedbi modela enotne revizije, pri katerem se revizije izvajajo, beležijo in se o njih pripravi poročilo v skladu z enotnim standardom – kar je predlagalo tudi Računsko sodišče v svojem mnenju št. 2/2004, Parlament pa ga je večkrat podprl – in vsaka raven kontrole temelji na prejšnji zaradi razbremenitve revidiranca in izboljšanja kakovosti revizijskih dejavnosti, vendar brez ogrožanja neodvisnosti zadevnih revizijskih organov; verjame, da bi morale notranje kontrole zagotoviti zadostno zagotovilo o zakonitosti in pravilnosti transakcij ter spoštovanje načel gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti, ter poudarja, da je treba kontrole uskladiti, da se prepreči nepotrebno podvajanje; opozarja na dejstvo, da je Računsko sodišče zunanji revizor Unije in zato ni dejavnik notranje kontrole;
Urges the introduction of a single audit model whereby audits are carried out, recorded and reported to a common standard - as proposed by the Court of Auditors in its Opinion 2/2004 and repeatedly supported by Parliament - where each level of control builds on the proceeding one, with a view to reducing the burden on the auditee and enhancing the quality of audit activities but without undermining the independence of the audit bodies concerned; believes that internal controls should provide reasonable assurance on the legality and regularity of transactions, and compliance with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness and underlines that controls should be coordinated to avoid unnecessary duplication; draws attention to the fact that the Court of Auditors is the external auditor of the Union and therefore not an element of internal control;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži poročilo o izvedljivosti uvedbe modela enotne revizije, ki se uporablja za proračun Unije, s čimer se bo končalo sedanje prekrivanje sistemov notranje kontrole na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Unije; poziva Komisijo, naj za vzorčevanje pri revizijah raje sprejme pristop, ki temelji na oceni tveganja, kot pristop, ki temelji na statističnem vzorčevanju;
Invites the Commission to present a report on the feasibility of introducing a single audit model applicable to the Union budget putting to an end the current juxtaposition of national and Union internal control systems; invites the Commission to adopt a risk-based approach for the auditing sampling rather than an approach based on statistical sampling;
opozarja na mnenje, izraženo v odstavku 65 svoje resolucije z dne 27. aprila 2006 UL L 340, 6.12.2006, str.
Recalls the opinion expressed in paragraph 65 of its resolution of 27 April 2006 OJ L 340, 6.12.2006, p.
o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2004, v katerem je nacionalne revizijske organe pozval, naj prevzamejo odgovornost za nadzor nad lokalno porabo sredstev EU, da ne bi bilo treba razmišljati o vzpostavljanju nacionalnih uradov Računskega sodišča; meni, da je treba v primeru, da nacionalni revizorski organi od javnih organov posamezne države članice ne želijo prevzeti nadzora odhodkov iz proračuna Unije, premisliti o reorganizaciji Računskega sodišča, tako da bodo nekateri njegovi člani odgovorni za določena politična področja, drugi pa za skupine držav članic; ugotavlja, da se je število članov Računskega sodišča v zadnjih letih dobesedno podvojilo, medtem ko se to ni zgodilo s številom političnih področij, kar pomeni, da ne presegajo zmogljivosti Računskega sodišča;
concerning discharge for the financial year 2004 that called for ’national audit bodies to assume responsibility for controlling the local use of EU funds, so as to make any consideration of establishing national offices of the Court of Auditors unnecessary’; believes that if national audit bodies are not willing for public bodies within their Member States to take over the control of expenditure from the Union budget, that consideration should be given to reorganising the Court of Auditors so that some of its members have responsibility for defined policy areas whilst others have responsibility for groups of Member States; notes that as the number of members of the Court of Auditors has virtually doubled in recent years, whilst the number of policy areas has not, this should be within the capacity of the Court of Auditors to manage;
je seznanjen s sodbo Sodišča evropske unije v združenih primerih Volker in Markus Schecke GbR C-92/09 in Harmut Eifert C-93/09 Sodba z dne 9. novembra 2010 v združenih primerih C-92/09 in C-93/09, Volker in Markus Schecke GbR in Hartmut Eifert v Land Hessen, še vedno ni objavljena pri ECR.
Notes the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases Volker and Markus Schecke GbR C-92/09 and Hartmut Eifert C-93/09 Judgment of 9 November 2010 in Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09, Volker and Markus Schecke GbR and Hartmut Eifert v Land Hessen, not yet published in the ECR.
ter s posledično potrebo po ravnovesju pri interesu Evropske unije za zagotavljanje preglednosti njenih dejanj ter zagotavljanju najboljše uporabe javnih sredstev, ne da bi vplivali na pravico zadevnih upravičencev do spoštovanja njihovega zasebnega življenja na splošno ter natančneje do varstva njihovih osebnih podatkov (primer Volker in Markus Schecke GbR odstavek 77 sodbe); vendar poudarja, da je Sodišče Evropske unije opozorilo na veljavnost načela preglednosti (primer Volker in Markus Schecke GbR, odstavek 68), kot je navedeno v členih 1 in 10 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in v členu 15 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ter je prav tako poudarilo, da objava poimenskih podatkov zadevnih upravičencev na internetu [...] krepi javni nadzor uporabe tega denarja ter prispeva k najboljši uporabi javnih sredstev (primer Volker in Markus Schecke, odstavek 75);
and the subsequent need to balance ’the European Union's interest in guaranteeing the transparency of its acts and ensuring the best use of public funds against the interference with the right of the beneficiaries concerned to respect for their private life in general and to the protection of their personal data in particular’ (Volker and Markus Schecke GbR, paragraph 77 of the judgment); stresses however that the Court of Justice has recalled the validity of the principle of transparency (Volker and Markus Schecke GbR, paragraph 68) as stated in Articles 1 and 10 of the Treaty on European Union and in Article 15 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and has also underlined that ’publication on the Internet of data by name relating to the beneficiaries concerned [...] reinforces public control of the use to which that money is put and contributes to the best use of public funds’ (Volker and Markus Schecke GbR, paragraph 75);
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva zahtevo Sodišča Evropske unije in naj nemudoma predlaga merila, pri katerih morata interes javnosti in preglednost prevladati nad varovanjem osebnih podatkov koristnikov sredstev Unije; opozarja, da je Sodišče Evropske unije predlagalo merila, kot so obdobja, med katerimi so fizične osebe prejele sredstva Unije, pogostost te pomoči ali tip ali vsota pomoči (primer Volker in Markus Schecke GbR, odstavek 89);
Calls on the Commission to follow up on the request of the Court of Justice and to swiftly propose criteria where the public interest in transparency should override the protection of personal data of Union funds’ beneficiaries; recalls that the Court of Justice has proposed criteria such as the periods during which natural persons have received Union funds, the frequency of such aid or the nature and amount of aid (Volker and Markus Schecke GbR, paragraph 89);
poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli merila, ki jih omenja Sodišče Evropske unije v finančni uredbi, sektorski zakonodaji ali katerem drugem aktu tako, da bo omogočila visoko raven preglednosti ter zagotovila, da se lahko podatki koristnikov, ki ustrezajo tem merilom, ponovno objavijo; poziva Komisijo, naj spremlja obveznosti držav članic glede pravilne in pravočasne objave podatkov in zahteva, naj Komisija Parlamentu predstavi rezultate tega spremljanja v naslednjem zbirnem poročilu;
Asks the Commission to define the criteria mentioned by the Court of Justice in the Financial Regulation, sectoral legislation or any other act in a way that allows a high level of transparency, ensuring that data on beneficiaries falling under these criteria can be published again; urges the Commission to monitor the Member States’ obligation to publish the data correctly and in a timely manner and requests the Commission to present the results of its monitoring in the next Synthesis Report;
opozarja na svoje zahteve iz razrešnice za leto 2008, naj se struktura in predstavitev podatkov o koristnikih standardizirata na nacionalnih, regionalnih in mednarodnih spletnih mestih, vključno s podatki prejemnikov in njihovih projektov
Recalls its request from its resolution on discharge for the financial year 2008 to standardise the structure and presentation of beneficiaries’ data on national, regional and international sites, including details of recipients and their projects;
ponovno poudarja svoje prepričanje, da je preglednost med glavnimi instrumenti za doseganje zakonitih in regularnih odhodkov, ter meni, da si je treba zastaviti cilj oblikovanja enotnega in celostnega spletnega sistema (centralna baza podatkov), do katerega bo vsak posameznik zlahka dostopal in ki bi zato javnosti omogočil, da bo imela enostaven dostop do celotnih in popolnih informacij o stroških Unije po proračunski vrstici in po upravičencu; vztraja, naj Komisija zbere podatke v zvezi z upravičenci do sredstev v tej centralni bazi podatkov ter zagotovi, da so zbrani podatki lahko dostopni in uporabniku prijazni; nadalje zahteva, da se podatki objavijo v primerljivem, berljivem, odprtokodnem formatu, po katerem je možno iskati, v enem od uradnih jezikov Unije;
Reiterates its belief that transparency is one of the main instruments in achieving legal and regular expenditure and believes that the objective should be the creation of a single and comprehensive online system (a central database) which can be accessed easily by any individual and would therefore allow the public to have easy access to full and complete information about the expenditure of the Union by budget line and by beneficiary; insists that the Commission collect data regarding the beneficiaries of funds in that central database and make the data collected easily accessible and user-friendly; further requests that the data be published in a comparable, machine-readable, searchable and open data format in one of the official languages of the Union;
zaradi povečanja preglednosti predlaga, da centralna zbirka podatkov o upravičencih do sredstev omogoča ne le pregled denarnih tokov v zneskih, ampak tudi povezav med različnimi akterji v projektu na različnih ravneh ob sočasnem upoštevanju varstva zasebnosti;
Proposes, in order to increase transparency, that the central database regarding the beneficiaries of funds shall make it possible to visualise not only money flows in figures but also the connections between the different actors in a project at different levels, whilst always taking into account the protection of privacy;
poudarja, da je treba izpolniti tri cilje, če naj javnost zaupa proračunu Unije:
Emphasises that for the public to have confidence in the Union budget, three objectives must be pursued:
računski izkazi morajo prikazati resničen in pravičen pogled na finančno stanje Unije,
that the accounts give a ’true and fair view’ of the financial position of the Union,
vsi odhodki morajo biti zakoniti in regularni ter morajo imeti pozitivno izjavo o zanesljivosti Računskega sodišča,
that all expenditure is ’legal and regular’ and receives a positive statement of assurance from the Court of Auditors,
vsi odhodki morajo obroditi predvidene rezultate,
that all expenditure delivers the outcomes for which it was intended,
poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda svoje sisteme za ocenjevanje učinkovitosti odhodkovnih programov, da bi ocenila, ali prispevajo dodano vrednost, so ekonomsko najugodnejši in dosegajo cilje, zaradi katerih so nastali; vztraja, da je treba te ocene neodvisno izvajati in nato ocenjevati; zato poziva, naj se neodvisne ocene predložijo v pregled Parlamentu in njegovim zadevnim odborom;
Calls on the Commission to review its systems for evaluating the effectiveness of expenditure programmes to assess whether they are adding value, delivering value for money, and achieving the objectives for which they were established; insists that such evaluations should be both conducted and then assessed independently; calls therefore for independent evaluations to be submitted to Parliament and its relevant committees for scrutiny;
je seznanjen s sklepi Evropskega sveta z dne 28. in 29. oktobra 2010 (EUCO 25/1/10) in s tem, da se ’voditelji držav ali vlad strinjajo s potrebo, da države članice vzpostavijo stalni krizni mehanizem za zaščito finančne stabilnosti euroobmočja’;
Notes the conclusions of the European Council of 28 - 29 October 2010 (EUCO 25/1/10) and that the ’Heads of State or Government agree on the need for Member States to establish a permanent crisis mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area’;
poziva Svet in države članice, naj pri oblikovanju stalnega kriznega mehanizma ustrezno preučijo naslednja vprašanja:
Invites the Council and the Member States to give due consideration to the following issues when devising a permanent crisis mechanism:
vzpostavi se ustrezna ureditev za javno zunanjo revizijo, odgovornost in popolno preglednost ter za stalni krizni mehanizem;
appropriate arrangements for public external audit and accountability and full transparency for the permanent crisis mechanism shall be established,
zagotovi se zanesljivost informacij in statističnih podatkov;
the reliability of data and statistics shall be ensured,
zagotoviti je treba jasne ureditve o odgovornosti in o poročanju ter v oblikovanje mehanizma je treba vključiti vse akterje, katerih odgovornosti so vključene;
responsibility and reporting arrangements shall be clear and all actors whose liabilities will be involved shall also be involved in the establishment of the mechanism,
opredeli se politični nadzor Parlamenta glede vseh izdaj euroobveznic na splošno, in še zlasti glede stalnega mehanizma za upravljanje krize;
Parliament's political scrutiny of any euro-bond issue, in general, and of the permanent crisis mechanism in particular shall be defined;
poziva Komisijo, naj revidira poročilo in usposabljanje osebja v zvezi z Naslovom II: Pravice in obveznosti Kadrovskih predpisov, da bi zagotovila, da je vse osebje v celoti seznanjeno s pogoji v njem in zlasti z obveznostmi iz člena 22a(96); poziva Komisijo, naj pristojnim odborom Parlamenta posreduje podrobnosti o opravljenem delu na tem področju;
Calls on the Commission to review the briefing and training given to staff regarding ’Title II: Rights and Obligations of officials’ of the Staff Regulations so as to ensure that all staff are fully conversant with its terms and particularly with the obligations under Article 22a(96); asks that the Commission provide details to Parliament's competent committee of the work undertaken in this area;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da Računsko sodišče ni ugotovilo napak, ki bi lahko postavile pod vprašaj zanesljivost računovodskih izkazov, ki so bili predmet revizije sodišča, ter zakonitost in pravilnost z njimi povezanih transakcij;
Welcomes the fact that the Court of Auditors did not find errors that might call into question the reliability of the accounts that it audited and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts;
poziva urad generalnega sekretarja evropskih šol, naj nemudoma zagotovi temeljite spremljevalne ukrepe na podlagi priporočil Računskega sodišča iz leta 2008 in 2009;
Invites the Office of the Secretary-General of the European Schools to ensure without delay a thorough follow-up of the Court of Auditors’ 2008 and 2009 recommendations;
izpostavlja povečanje skupnih stroškov v primerih, ko so bili učitelji, ki so jih imenovale države članice, dolgo odsotni, in jih je bilo treba nadomestiti z učitelji, ki s delali s skrajšanim delovnim časom; pričakuje, da bodo šole lahko posredovale podatke o teh dodatnih stroških;
Points to an increase in overall costs where teachers appointed by the Member States were absent for long periods and had to be replaced by part-time teachers; expects schools to be able to provide figures for these extra costs;
ugotavlja, da je ugled Unije močno odvisen od javnega mnenja o njenih javnih uslužbencih; ugotavlja, da se določbe kadrovskih predpisov z zadnjo reformo niso prilagodile spremenjenemu delovnemu okolju, prav tako niso zagotovile enakopravnega plačila za isto delo; ugotavlja, da vsebujejo zastarele bonitete in privilegije; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predloge za celovito posodobitev kadrovskih predpisov, vključno z ukinitvijo zastarelih bonitet in privilegijev;
Notes that the reputation of the Union is strongly influenced by the public perception of its civil service; notes that the last reform of the Staff Regulations did not adapt its provisions to a changed working environment nor lead to a remuneration policy that provides for equal pay for equal work; notes that it contains out-dated perks and benefits; calls on the Commission to present proposals for a comprehensive modernisation of the Staff Regulations, including the end of out-dated perks and benefits;
Posebne ugotovitve
Specific findings
pozdravlja konkretne ukrepe in ustrezne časovne razporede, ki jih je predstavila Komisija, kot rezultat konstruktivnih razprav znotraj postopka razrešnic;
Welcomes the concrete measures and corresponding timelines presented by the Commission as a result of the constructive discussions within the discharge procedure;
Kmetijstvo in naravni viri – 56 300 000 000 EUR
Agriculture and natural resources - EUR 56 300 000 000
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija v zadnjih letih uspela zmanjšati stopnjo napak na približno 2 %; vendar ugotavlja, da se je stopnja napak malo povišala v letu 2009;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has succeeded in bringing the error rate down to around 2 % in recent years; however, notes that the error rate increased slightly in 2009;
poziva Komisijo, naj ukrepa in zagotovi, da bo stopnja napak ohranila trend iz leta v leto in da nepravilnosti ne bo več;
Calls upon the Commission to take steps to ensure that the reduction in the error rate becomes a trend that is maintained year-on-year so as to ensure that the irregularities cease;
opozarja, da so bili skoraj vsi odhodki za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja izvršeni z deljenim upravljanjem;
Recalls that for agriculture and rural development practically all expenditure is carried out under shared management;
ugotavlja, da na podlagi rezultatov svoje revizije Računsko sodišče ocenjuje, da je najverjetnejša stopnja napak za ’Kmetijstvo in naravne vire’ (temu področju politik je namenjena skoraj polovica proračuna) med 2 % in 5 %;
Notes that on the basis of its audit results the Court of Auditors estimates that the most likely error rate for ’Agriculture and natural resources’, which accounts for nearly half of the budget, is between 2 % and 5 %;
ugotavlja tudi, da so bile v letu 2009 pri 66 pregledanih transakcijah (27 %) od 241 ugotovljene napake in da so bile pri 42 (64 %) takšnih transakcijah ugotovljene količinsko opredeljive napake, ki zadevajo zlasti napake pri upravičenosti, izhajajoče iz prevelike količine prijavljenih upravičenih zemljišč;
Also notes that in 2009, out of 241 transactions examined, 66 (27 %) were affected by error and that 42 (64 %) of these transactions were affected by quantifiable errors notably concerning eligibility and accuracy errors, resulting from over-declaration of eligible land;
meni, da je učinkovitost teh področij porabe kot celote, ne zgolj posameznih projektov, treba oceniti glede na splošni trend napak;
Considers that the effectiveness of the spending areas as a whole, not just individual projects, must be evaluated on its overall trend of errors;
ugotavlja, da je bil po nenehni pozornosti Parlamenta izboljšan integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem (IAKS) v Grčiji;
Notes the improvements of the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) in Greece following Parliament's continuous attention;
vseeno opozarja, da je Računsko sodišče v zadnjih letih ugotovilo, da na uspešnost sistema IAKS negativno vplivajo netočni podatki v podatkovnih zbirkah, nepopolno navzkrižno preverjanje ali nepravilno ali nepopolno nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi z odstopanji;
Recalls, however, that the Court of Auditors in recent years has found the effectiveness of the IACS adversely affected by inaccurate data in the databases, incomplete cross checks or incorrect or incomplete follow-up of anomalies;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče v letu 2009 pri svoji reviziji osmih plačilnih agencij ugotovilo, da so bili sistemi uspešni pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti plačil le v eni agenciji, delno uspešni v štirih in neuspešni v ostalih treh agencijah;
Notes that for its 2009 audit of eight paying agencies, the Court of Auditors found the systems to be effective in ensuring the regularity of payments in only one agency, partially effective in four agencies, and ineffective in the remaining three agencies;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Računskega sodišča, da so bili nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi na področju ’Kmetijstvo in naravni viri’ v najboljšem primeru delno uspešni pri zagotavljanju pravilnosti plačil;
Notes the Court of Auditors’ conclusion that the supervisory and control systems for Agriculture and natural resources were, at best, partially effective in ensuring the regularity of payments;
prav tako je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Računskega sodišča, da je treba sistem IAKS občutno izboljšati v treh od osmih plačilnih agencij, ki so bile predmet revizije;
Further notes that the Court of Auditors concludes that the IACS needs significant improvements in three out of eight paying agencies audited;
prav tako je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Računskega sodišča, da letno poročilo o dejavnosti in izjava, ki jo je podal generalni direktor za kmetijstvo, zagotavljata le delno pošteno oceno finančnega upravljanja v povezavi s pravilnostjo plačil;
Also notes that the Court of Auditors found that the Annual Activity Report and the declaration given by the Director General for Agriculture provided only partially fair assessment of financial management in relation to the regularity of payments;