natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da bi v tako analizo morala biti vključena preiskava možnih sinergij in, zlasti, prihrankov, med drugim s prestrukturiranjem, dodatnim medinstitucionalnim sodelovanjem, pregledom metod dela v vsaki instituciji in organu, boljšim ločevanjem nalog institucij in agencij, upoštevanjem srednje- in dolgoročnih finančnih posledic nepremičninske politike, pokojninskih sistemov in drugih področij zakonskih določb za zaposlene v institucijah EU; meni, da ta analiza lahko pokaže, da obstaja prostor za zmanjšanje celotnega upravnega proračuna EU brez ogrožanja visoke kakovosti, uspešnosti in privlačnosti javne uprave EU;
Points out that such analysis should investigate the scope for synergies and, notably, savings, inter alia through restructuring, further interinstitutional cooperation, review of each institution's and body's working methods and working places, better separation of tasks of institutions and agencies, the medium and long-term financial impact of building policy, pension systems and other areas of statutory provisions of staff working for EU institutions; believes that this analysis can show that there is scope for a reduction of the overall EU administrative budget without compromising the high quality, performance and attractiveness of the EU public administration;
opozarja na velike prihranke, ki bi jih lahko zagotovili z enim samim sedežem Evropskega parlamenta;
Points to the significant savings that could be made if the European Parliament were to have a single seat;
Struktura, ki odraža prednostne naloge
A structure to reflect priorities
meni, da bi morala struktura naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira omogočiti tako kontinuiteto načrtovanja kot prilagodljivost znotraj razdelkov in med njimi in se izogniti spodrsljajem obstoječega večletnega finančnega okvira, zlasti kar zadeva primanjkljaj v podrazdelku 1a „Konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje“, podrazdelku 3b „Državljanstvo“ in razdelku 4 „Zunanji odnosi“; meni, da bi morala struktura večletnega finančnega okvira povečati prepoznavnost političnih in proračunskih prednostnih nalog EU za evropske državljane; v zvezi s tem vztraja, da se je treba izogniti neutemeljenim velikim spremembam ter utrditi in izboljšati obstoječo strukturo;
Considers that the structure of the next MFF should facilitate both planning continuity and flexibility within and between headings, and avoid the failures of the current MFF, particularly with regard to shortfalls in subheading 1a ‘Competitiveness for Growth and Employment’, subheading 3b ‘Citizenship’ and heading 4 ‘External relations’; considers that the MFF structure should increase the visibility of EU political and budgetary priorities for the European citizens; insists, in this respect, on the need to avoid unjustified radical changes and to consolidate and improve the current structure;
ponovno poudarja, da bi strategija Evropa 2020 morala biti glavna referenca politik za naslednji večletni finančni okvir; zato meni, da bi struktura morala odražati razsežnosti strategije Evropa 2020 v zvezi s pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rastjo ter jim zagotoviti politično prepoznavnost; zato predlaga novo strukturo, v kateri bodo v enem razdelku združene vse notranje politike z naslovom „Evropa 2020“;
Reiterates that the Europe 2020 strategy should be the main policy reference for the next MFF; considers, as a consequence, that the structure should reflect and give political visibility to the Europe 2020 dimensions of smart, sustainable and inclusive growth; proposes, accordingly, a new structure grouping under one single heading all internal policies under the title ‘Europe 2020’;
predlaga, da se znotraj razdelka za strategijo Evropa 2020 vzpostavijo štirje podrazdelki za povezane politike, kar bi moralo spodbujati tudi boljše sinergije pri njihovem usklajevanju in izvajanju; zato predlaga podrazdelek, ki obsega politike, povezane z znanjem; drugi podrazdelek, namenjen kohezijski politiki, ki odraža njeno horizontalno naravo in prispevek k vsem ciljem strategije Evropa 2020, kot tudi socialni politiki; tretji podrazdelek, ki obsega politike, povezane z vzdržnostjo in učinkovitostjo rabe virov; in četrti podrazdelek za državljanstvo, ki bi podrazdelka 3a (državljanstvo) in 3b (politike svobode, varnosti in pravice) trenutnega večletnega finančnega okvira združil v enotni podrazdelek glede na pretekle težave, ki so se pojavile, kadar se je več majhnih programov združilo v majhnem podrazdelku;
Proposes to establish under the Europe 2020 heading four subheadings involving linked policies which should also favour better coordination and implementation synergies among them; proposes, thus, a subheading comprising knowledge related policies; a second subheading devoted to cohesion policy reflecting its horizontal nature and its contribution to all Europe 2020 objectives, as well as social policy; a third subheading encompassing sustainability and resource-efficiency related policies; and a fourth subheading on citizenship, which would combine the current MFF subheadings 3a (citizenship) and 3b (freedom, security and justice ) into a single subheading given the previous experienced difficulties which arise when a number of small programmes are brought together within a small subheading;
meni, da bi moral naslednji večletni finančni okvir v razdelku „Evropa 2020“ omogočiti ločene obračunske enote za velike projekte, ki so strateškega pomena za Unijo; meni, da bi moral biti v proračunu EU določen dolgoročni prispevek za te projekte, da bi zagotovili kontinuiteto njihovega načrtovanja in organizacijsko stabilnost; meni, da se dodatna sredstva, ki bi utegnila biti potrebna za te projekte, ne smejo iskati na račun manjših uspešnih projektov, ki se financirajo iz proračuna EU;
Believes that the next MFF should allow for a ring-fencing of large-scale projects, which are of strategic importance for the Union, within the heading ‘Europe 2020’; believes that the EU budget should make a long-term contribution to these projects, in order to ensure their planning continuity and organisation stability; considers that, should additional financial resources be needed for these large-scale projects, those should not be found at the expense of smaller successful projects that are financed by the EU budget;
meni, da je glede na povezani značaj strategije Evropa 2020 in z namenom zagotoviti ustrezno usklajenost proračunskih sredstev s postopnim razvojem strategije bistveno, da se zagotovi višja stopnja prilagodljivosti med štirimi podrazdelki strategije Evropa 2020;
Considers that, in view of the integrated character of the Europe 2020 strategy, and in order to ensure that budgetary means are appropriately aligned with the progressive development of the strategy, it is essential that a higher degree of flexibility is ensured among the four Europe 2020 subheadings;
opozarja na težave, ki se pojavijo, če je več manjših programov združenih znotraj majhnega podrazdelka; zato predlaga, da se podrazdelka 3a (državljanstvo) in 3b (politike svobode, varnosti in pravice) iz večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013 združita v enotni podrazdelek;
Recalls the difficulties which arise when a number of rather small programmes are brought together within a small subheading; proposes, accordingly, to combine the 2007-2013 MFF subheadings 3a (citizenship) and 3b (freedom, security and justice policies) into a single subheading;
poziva k ohranitvi razdelka za zunanje politike;
Calls for maintaining a heading for external policies;
poziva k ohranitvi razdelka za upravo;
Calls for maintaining a heading for administration;
poziva k oblikovanju „skupne rezerve večletnega finančnega okvira“, namenjene vsem razdelkom pod skupno zgornjo mejo večletnega finančnega okvira in nad ločenimi razpoložljivimi razlikami vsakega razdelka, ki se uporabljajo v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka; meni, da bi takšna rezerva morala prejeti neporabljene rezerve kot tudi zapadle ali neporabljene odobritve (za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila) iz predhodnega proračunskega leta;
Calls for the creation of a ‘global MFF margin’ serving all headings below the overall MFF ceiling and above the separate available margins of each heading to be mobilised in the framework of the annual budgetary procedure; believes that such margin should also receive the unspent margins as well as the decommitted and unspent appropriations (commitments and payments) of the previous budgetary year;
poleg tega meni, da je za izboljšanje preglednosti in vidnosti treba uporabiti dodatno „rezervo“, ki bo pod zgornjo mejo lasnih sredstev in nad zgornjo mejo večletnega finančnega okvira, da se vključijo tveganja neplačil, povezanih z garancijami za posojila evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo in instrumenta za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic, ki niso članice euroobmočja, kot tudi morebitnega posredovanja proračuna EU v okviru evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost po letu 2013;
Considers, moreover, that in order to improve transparency and visibility an additional ‘reserve margin’ below the own resources ceiling and above the MFF ceiling should be used for including the risks of defaults linked to the loan guarantees of the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism and the Facility providing medium-term financial assistance to non-Euro area Member States' balances of payments, as well as a possible intervention of the EU budget in the European Stability Mechanism after 2013;
poziva Komisijo, naj v prilogi k proračunu EU navede vse odhodke EU, ki – po medvladnem postopku – nastanejo zunaj proračuna EU; meni, da bodo te letno posredovane informacije dale celotno sliko o vseh naložbah, o katerih se države članice dogovorijo na ravni EU;
Urges the Commission to provide in an annex to the EU budget all EU related expenditure that occurs –following an intergovernmental procedure- outside the EU budget; believes that this information provided on an annual basis will give a complete picture of all investments that Member States agree to undertake at the EU level;
meni, da bi proračun EU moral jasno določiti – morebiti z aneksom – vse naložbe na vseh področjih politik EU, ki izhajajo iz različnih delov proračuna EU; obenem meni, da bi morala Komisija zagotoviti tudi oceno naložbenih potreb, ki so predvidene za celotno trajanje programskega obdobja;
Suggests that the EU budget should clearly identify - possibly in an annex - all investments that are made in each EU policy field, originating also from different parts of the EU budget; believes, at the same time, that the Commission should also provide an estimate of the investment needs that are foreseen for the whole duration of the programming period;
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v osnutek proračuna, ko ga bo posredovala proračunskemu organu EU, vključi podrobne informacije o prihodkovni strani proračuna EU; ugotavlja, da je skupna predstavitev prihodkovne in odhodkovne strani proračuna dejansko standardna praksa za vse nacionalne proračune; je trdno prepričan, da bo na ta način zagotovljena trajna razprava o sistemu financiranja Unije, hkrati pa v celoti priznava, da proračunski organ trenutno nima nobene pristojnosti za predlaganje sprememb tega dela proračuna;
Urges the Commission to include detailed information on the revenue side of the EU budget in its Draft Budget, as transmitted to the EU budgetary authority; notes that a joint presentation of the revenue and expenditure side of the budget is actually standard practice for all national budgets; strongly believes that in this way a permanent debate on the financing system of the Union will be maintained, while fully acknowledging that the budgetary authority does not have at present any competence to propose changes to this part of the budget;
zato za naslednji večletni finančni okvir predlaga naslednjo strukturo:
Proposes, therefore, the following structure for the next MFF:
Vključuje politike na področju raziskav in inovacij, izobraževanja in vseživljenjskega učenja ter politike notranjega trga.
Including research and innovation, education and lifelong learning and internal market policies.
ponovno poudarja svoje stališče, vključeno v resoluciji Parlamenta z dne 25. marca 2009 o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira 2007–2013 UL C 117 E, 6.5.2010, str.
Reiterates its position included in its resolution of 25 March 2009 on the Mid-term Review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2010, p.
, da je večja prilagodljivost znotraj razdelkov in med njimi absolutno potrebna za zmožnosti delovanja Unije, ne samo za soočanje z novimi izzivi, ampak tudi za olajšanje postopka sprejemanja odločitev znotraj institucij;
, that more flexibility within and across headings is an absolute necessity for the functioning capacities of the Union not only to face the new challenges but also to facilitate the decision-making process within the institutions;
Vmesni pregled 144.
Mid-term Review 144.
poudarja, da je, če je obdobje večletnega finančnega okvira daljše od 5 let, potreben obvezen vmesni pregled, ki omogoča kvantitativno in kvalitativno analizo in oceno stanja delovanja večletnega finančnega okvira; poudarja, da bi v prihodnosti vmesni pregled moral postati pravno zavezujoča obveznost, vključena v uredbo o večletnem finančnem okviru, s posebnim postopkom, ki zajema tudi zavezujoč časovni razpored ter zagotavlja polno vključenost Parlamenta v njegovi vlogi zakonodajnega in proračunskega organa; poudarja, da bi bilo treba, če bi bila s pregledom ugotovljena neustreznost zgornjih meja za preostanek obdobja, zagotoviti resnično možnost za njihovo revizijo;
Stresses the need, if the MFF period is longer than 5 years, for an obligatory Mid-term Review allowing for a quantitative as well as qualitative analysis and stock-taking on the functioning of the MFF; underlines that, in the future, the Mid-term Review should become a legally binding obligation enshrined in the MFF regulation, with a specific procedure including a binding calendar, which ensures full involvement of the Parliament in its role of legislative and budgetary authority; stresses that, if the review should establish the inadequacy of the ceilings for the rest of the period, a real possibility to revise them should be guaranteed;
Revizija zgornjih meja 145.
Revising the ceilings 145.
vztraja, da je stopnja prilagodljivosti, ki jo dejansko zagotavlja mehanizem za revizijo, odvisna od postopka njegovega izvajanja, in meni, da se sooča s splošno nenaklonjenostjo Sveta njegovi uporabi; meni, da je bistveno – če naj prilagajanje zgornjih meja odhodkov ostane realistična možnost –, da je v prihodnjih mehanizmih za revizijo predviden poenostavljen postopek za spremembe do dogovorjene mejne vrednosti; poleg tega poziva k ohranitvi možnosti zvišanja skupne zgornje meje večletnega finančnega okvira;
Insists that the degree of flexibility actually provided by the revision mechanism is dependent on the procedure for exercising it, and faces a general reluctance of the Council to using it; considers it essential -if the adjustment of expenditure ceilings is to remain a realistic option- that the future mechanisms for revision foresee a simplified procedure for changes under an agreed threshold; calls, in addition, for the possibility to increase the overall MFF ceiling to be maintained;
Zagotavljanje zadostnih rezerv in prilagodljivosti pod zgornjimi mejami 146.
Ensuring sufficient margins and flexibility below the ceilings 146.
poudarja, da je pomembno, da se za vsak razdelek zagotovijo zadostne rezerve; se je z zanimanjem seznanil s predlogom Komisije, da se določi fiksen odstotek za rezerve; vendar meni, da bi ta možnost lahko zagotovila boljšo prilagodljivost le, če bi bile prihodnje zgornje meje postavljene dovolj visoko, da bi dopuščale takšen dodaten manevrski prostor;
Stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient reserves for each heading; notes with interest the Commission's proposal to establish a fixed percentage for margins; considers, however, that this option could provide better flexibility only if the future ceilings were set at a sufficiently high level, allowing for such additional room for manoeuvre;
poudarja, da bi bilo prilagodljivost pod zgornjimi mejami treba okrepiti na vse možne načine, ter pozdravlja predloge Komisije v pregledu proračuna, in sicer:
Points out that flexibility below the ceilings should be enhanced in all possible ways and welcomes the Commission's proposals put forward in the Budget Review;
meni, da je pomembno ohraniti možnost razporejanja sredstev na začetek ali konec programskega obdobja znotraj posameznega razdelka večletnega okvira, da se omogoči proticiklično delovanje in smiselno odzivanje na hujše krize; meni, da obstoječi sistem prilagodljivosti za zakonodajne akte v obstoječem večletnem finančnem okviru deluje dovolj dobro; zato poziva, naj se mejna vrednost prilagodljivosti 5 % nad ali pod zneski, določenimi s postopkom soodločanja, v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru ohrani;
Considers important to maintain the possibility to front or backload spending within a heading's multi-annual envelope, to allow for countercyclical action and a meaningful response to major crises; considers, in this respect, that the current system of flexibility for legislative acts has worked sufficiently well in the current MFF; calls, therefore, for the flexibility threshold of 5% above or below the amounts fixed under codecision to be maintained in the next MFF;
je prepričan, da bi se neporabljene rezerve ter zapadla in neporabljena sredstva (sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila) iz proračuna za določeno leto morala prenesti v naslednje leto ter predstavljati skupno rezervo večletnega finančnega okvira za različne razdelke glede na njihove ocenjene potrebe; zato meni, da bi se denar, dodeljen v proračun EU, moral porabiti samo v tem okviru in se ne bi smel vračati državam članicam, kot se trenutno dogaja;
Is convinced that unused margins, de-committed and unused appropriations (both commitments and payments) in one year's budget should be carried over to the next year and constitute a global MFF margin to be attributed to the different headings according to their estimated needs; believes, therefore, that the money allocated to the EU budget should only be spent in this context and not returned to the Member States, as is currently the case;
poleg tega meni, da mora te predloge dopolnjevati možnost prilagodljivosti prerazporeditev, da bi se sredstva v danem letu lahko prenašala med razdelki, in večja prilagodljivost med podrazdelki;
Believes, in addition, that these proposals must be complemented by a reallocation flexibility to transfer between headings in a given year and by increased flexibility between sub-headings;
ponovno poudarja, da mora biti postopek sprejemanja odločitev zasnovan tako, da omogoča učinkovito uporabo teh instrumentov;
Reiterates that the decision-making process must be designed so as to allow for the effective use of these instruments;
Mehanizmi prilagodljivosti 152.
Flexibility mechanisms 152.
meni, da je bistveno, da se ohranijo posebni instrumenti (instrument prilagodljivosti, Evropski sklad za prilagajanje na globalizacijo, Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije, rezerva za nujno pomoč ), ki jih je mogoče začasno vključiti, in da se jih izboljša z nadaljnjim poenostavljanjem njihove uporabe in zagotavljanjem zadostnih sredstev zanje, pa tudi z možnostjo oblikovanja novih instrumentov v prihodnosti; poudarja, da mora vključevanje takih dodatnih virov financiranja spoštovati metodo Skupnosti;
Considers it crucial to maintain special instruments (Flexibility Instrument, European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, European Union Solidarity Fund, Emergency Aid Reserve), which can be mobilised on an ad-hoc basis, by further simplifying their use and providing them with sufficient envelopes, as well as by possibly creating new instruments in the future; stresses that the mobilisation of such additional sources of funding must abide by the Community method;
meni, da je Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji uspešen pri zagotavljanju solidarnosti in podpore EU delavcem, ki so izgubili delo zaradi negativnih učinkov globalizacije ter globalne finančne in gospodarske krize, zato bi ga bilo treba ohraniti tudi v novem večletnem finančnem okviru; vendar meni, da so postopki za izvajanje podpore sklada preveč zamudni in zapleteni, poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga načine, kako te postopke v prihodnje poenostaviti in skrajšati;
Considers that the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) has been successful in providing EU solidarity and support to workers made redundant because of the adverse effects of globalisation and the global financial and economic crisis and should, therefore, be maintained under the new MFF; believes, however, that the procedures for implementing the support from the EGF are too time consuming and cumbersome; calls on the Commission to propose ways in which these procedures can be simplified and shortened for the future;
meni, da je bil instrument prilagodljivosti, ki je bil med mehanizmi prilagodljivosti izrabljen v največji meri, bistven za zagotavljanje dodatne prilagodljivosti; predlaga občutno zvišanje začetnega zneska za instrument prilagodljivosti z nadaljnjimi letnimi zvišanji v obdobju večletnega finančnega okvira ter ohranitev možnosti, da se del neporabljenega letnega zneska prenese do leta n+2;
Believes that the Flexibility Instrument, which has been the most fully implemented of the flexibility mechanisms, has been essential in providing for additional flexibility; proposes to significantly increase the initial amount for the Flexibility Instrument, with a subsequent yearly increase over the period of the MFF, and to keep the possibility to carryover the portion of the unused annual amount up to year n+2;
ugotavlja, da so bila v zadnjih letih sredstva za soočanje z nujnimi naravnimi nesrečami in humanitarnimi katastrofami nezadostna; zato poziva k občutnemu povečanju sredstev za rezervo za nujno pomoč ter k možnosti večletne vključitve tega instrumenta;
Notes that in recent years the funds available to address urgent natural and humanitarian disasters have been insufficient; calls, accordingly, for a substantial increase of the envelope of the Emergency Aid Reserve as well as the possibility for a multi-annual mobilisation of the instrument;
Trajanje večletnega finančnega okvira
The duration of the MFF
poudarja, da bi odločitev o trajanju naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira morala najti pravo ravnovesje med stabilnostjo za programske cikluse in izvajanjem posameznih politik ter trajanjem političnih ciklusov institucij – zlasti tistih v Evropski komisiji in Evropskemu parlamentu; opozarja, da daljše obdobje zahteva večjo prilagodljivost;
Underlines that the choice of the duration of the next MFF should strike the right balance between stability for programming cycles and implementation of individual policies, and the duration of the institutions' political cycles –in particular those in the European Commission and the European Parliament-; recalls that a longer period requires greater flexibility;
meni, da je petletni ciklus popolnoma v skladu z željo, ki jo je izrazil Parlament, da je treba trajanje večletnega finančnega okvira kar najbolj uskladiti s trajanjem političnih ciklusov institucij, in sicer zavoljo demokratične odgovornosti; vendar je zaskrbljen, da je petletni ciklus morda na tej stopnji prekratek za politike, za katere je potrebno dolgoročnejše načrtovanje (tj. kohezija, kmetijstvo, vseevropska omrežja) in se ne bi skladal z zahtevami življenjskega ciklusa načrtovanja in izvajanja teh politik;
Believes that a 5-year cycle fully complies with the Parliament's expressed will to align, as much as possible, the MFF duration with the duration of the institutions' political cycles, for reasons of democratic accountability and responsibility; is concerned, however, that a 5-year cycle might be too short at this stage for policies which need a longer term programming (i.e. cohesion, agriculture, TENs) and would not fully comply with those policies' programming and implementation life cycle requirements;