natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, kot je to storil Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 11. junija 2010, da lahko zanemarjanje gozdov povzroči tako resne težave, da morda ne bo več mogoče zagotoviti, da bodo tudi v prihodnje opravljali svoje funkcije;
Draws attention, as the Council did in its conclusions of 11 June 2010, to the fact that serious problems can arise from forest abandonment insofar as it may no longer be possible to ensure that forests continue to perform their functions;
meni, da je treba spodbujati in podpirati ustanavljanje združenj proizvajalcev in organov za upravljanje gozdov, ki izvajajo trajnostno upravljanje gozdov, zlasti na območjih z manjšimi gozdovi, saj bo to pomagalo uravnovesiti pridobivanje številnih dobrin in storitev, ki nam jih gozdovi zagotavljajo; meni, da bi tovrstna združenja in organi okrepili pogajalsko moč proizvajalcev v lesni dobavni verigi, pomagali vzpostaviti enake konkurenčne pogoje in obenem prispevali k reševanju težav zaradi gospodarske krize, mednarodne konkurence in podnebnih sprememb, ter pomagali v boju proti nezakoniti sečnji;
Considers it necessary to encourage and support the setting up of associations of producers and forest management bodies practising SFM, particularly in areas characterised by small forests, as this will help to balance the supply of the many goods and services that forests can provide; considers that such associations and bodies would strengthen producers’ bargaining power in the timber supply chain, helping to provide and create a level playing field while contributing simultaneously to tackling the problems of the economic crisis, international competition and climate change and combating illegal logging;
vztraja, da je treba pomoč javnim in zasebnim akterjem, ki varujejo biotsko raznovrstnost gozdnih vrst, habitatov in ekosistemskih storitev, povečati in vključiti tudi prostovoljne metode varovanja in območja, ki povezujejo območja NATURA 2000, saj je biotska raznovrstnost bistvenega pomena za ohranjanje, razvoj in prilagajanje kmetijstva;
Maintains that assistance to public and private actors protecting forest biodiversity of species, habitats and ecosystem services must increase and include voluntary protection methods and areas connecting NATURA 2000 sites, as biodiversity is vital to the maintenance, development and adaptation of agriculture;
poziva, naj se sistem nadomestil na podlagi računov nadomesti s sistemom standardnih stroškov ali stroškov na površino;
Calls for the invoice-based system of remuneration to be replaced by a system of standard or area-based costs;
poziva k razvoju standarda za dobre gozdarske prakse, ki bi se uporabljal kot izhodišče za podporo v okviru vseh ukrepov v zvezi z gozdovi;
Calls for the development of a standard for good forestry practices to be used as a baseline for support under all forest measures;
poziva k obvezni vključitvi ukrepov za gozdno okolje in mrežo Natura 2000 v programe za razvoj podeželja ter k podpori, vezani na površino, za mrežo Natura 2000 v okviru neposrednih plačil;
Calls for the mandatory inclusion of forest environment and Natura 2000 measures in rural development programmes, and for area-based support for the Natura 2000 network under direct payments;
odločno zavrača uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine za gozdne genske vire;
Strongly rejects the application of intellectual property rights over forest genetic resources;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj projektom na področju gozdarstva in varstva gozdov pri vsem financiranju EU zagotovijo dolgoročno perspektivo;
Urges the Commission and Member States to guarantee the long-term horizons of forestry and forest protection projects in all EU financing;
je prepričan, da je preprečevanje gozdnih požarov stroškovno veliko bolj učinkovito kot boj proti njim;
Is convinced that preventing forest fires is much more cost-effective than combating them;
opozarja na nujno potrebo po izvajanju priporočil za preprečevanje naravnih ali s strani človeka povzročenih nesreč, ki jih je nedavno sprejel Parlament Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. septembra 2010 o sporočilu Komisije: Skupnostni pristop k preprečevanju naravnih nesreč in nesreč, ki jih povzroči človek ( P7_TA(2010)0326 ).
Draws attention to the urgent need to implement the recommendations on the prevention of natural or human-made disasters which it recently adopted European Parliament resolution of 21 September 2010 on the Commission communication: A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters ( P7_TA(2010)0326 ).
, še posebej tistih o podpori programom pogozdovanja in ponovnega pogozdovanja, ki dajejo prednost lokalnim vrstam in mešanim gozdovom v korist biotski raznovrstnosti in večji odpornosti na požare, neurja in bolezni; opozarja na dodatne težave, ki s katerimi se pri spoprijemanju s požari spopadajo otoki in najbolj oddaljene regije; poziva, naj se tem regijam zagotovi posebno obravnavanje prek različnih razpoložljivih finančnih instrumentov, tudi prek Solidarnostnega sklada;
, especially those concerning support for afforestation/reafforestation schemes giving preference to local species and mixed forests, in the interests of biodiversity and improved resistance to fires, storms and diseases; also draws attention to the added difficulties faced by islands and the outermost regions in tackling fires; calls for such regions to be given special treatment through the various financial instruments available, including the Solidarity Fund;
meni, da bi preprečevanje gozdnih požarov z načrtovanjem in povezljivostjo krajin ter z infrastrukturo in usposabljanjem moralo biti trdno zasidrano v politikah EU za varstvo gozdov, prilagajanje in civilno zaščito;
Considers that forest fire prevention through landscape planning and connectivity, infrastructure and training should be firmly anchored in the EU's forest protection, adaptation and civil protection policies;
poudarja, da bo v sušnih območjih in regijah, ki jim grozi dezertifikacija, ponovno pogozdovanje s produktivnimi vrstami koristilo prebivalcem in zagotovilo njihovo sodelovanje pri varovanju gozdov in boju proti požarom;
Points out that, in arid areas and regions at risk of desertification, reafforestation with productive species will benefit the inhabitants and secure their involvement in the tasks of conservation and firefighting;
poudarja nesporni pomen gozdnih območij, ki varujejo človekov življenjski prostor pred negativnimi vplivi naravnih pojavov, za javno varnost;
Stresses the indisputable importance for public safety of forest areas which protect human habitats from the negative impact of natural phenomena;
meni, da sistem trgovanja z emisijami v svoji sedanji obliki ni združljiv z obračunavanjem rabe tal, spremembe rabe tal in gozdarstva, kar je predvsem posledica razlike med letnimi skladnostnimi zahtevami za industrijske obrate v okviru sistema trgovanja z emisijami ter daljšimi časovnimi obdobji, potrebnimi za pojav in opažanje sprememb zalog ogljika na zemljiščih; zato ne bi smelo biti nikakršnega povezovanja; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno preuči, kako bi lahko najbolje financirali prihranke emisij ogljika iz dejavnosti rabe zemljišč, spremembe namembnosti zemljišč in gozdarstva;
Considers that the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) in its current form is incompatible with LULUCF accounting, primarily as a result of the difference between annual compliance requirements for industrial installations under the ETS and the longer timescales required for carbon stock changes in landholdings to occur and be observed; and therefore no linkage should be made; in this regard, calls on the Commission to reconsider how best to provide funding for carbon savings from LULUCF activities;
se zaveda izzivov, povezanih z razmišljanjem o vključitvi teh dejavnosti rabe zemljišč, spremembe namembnosti zemljišč in gozdarstva v cilje držav članic v okviru odločbe o skupnih prizadevanjih; izraža posebno zaskrbljenost nad tem, da bi utegnile razlike v natančnosti obračunavanja in velike naravne razlike ogroziti sistem skladnosti v okviru te odločbe; zato poziva k ločenim ciljem za sektor rabe zemljišč, spremembe namembnosti zemljišč in gozdarstva;
Acknowledges the challenges associated with any consideration of inclusion of LULUCF in Member States’ targets under the Effort Sharing Decision; is concerned in particular that differences in accounting precision and a large degree of natural variation could undermine the compliance regime under that Decision; calls therefore for separate targets for the LULUCF sector;
izraža zavezanost uresničevanju cilja za energijo iz obnovljivih virov po strategiji EU 2020 in cilj dveh stopinj Celzija v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami; je vendarle zaskrbljen, da bi predpostavka o ogljični nevtralnosti lesne biomase in kratki časovni okviri, ki se uporabljajo v sedanji metodologiji za izračun izpustov toplogrednih plinov, lahko ogrozili uresničevanje obeh ciljev; poziva Komisijo, naj se posvetuje z medvladnim odborom IPCC in oblikuje novo metodologijo za izračun izpustov toplogrednih plinov, ki bo nadzirala daljša časovna obdobja in izpuste iz biomase, vezane na rabo zemljišč, spremembe v rabi zemljišč in upravljanje gozdov, in sicer z ocenjevanjem tokov ogljika na nacionalni ravni in vključitvijo različnih gozdarskih faz (sajenje, redčenje in sečnja);
Expresses its commitment to meeting the EU 2020 renewable energy target and the 2 degree Celsius climate-change target; is concerned however that the short time-frames used in the current greenhouse gas (GHG) calculation methodology, and the resulting carbon neutrality assumption for woody biomass, could hinder their achievement; calls on the Commission to consult the IPCC and establish a new GHG calculation methodology, controlling for longer time horizons and for biomass emissions from land use, land use change and forest management assessing carbon flow on a national level, and integrating the different phases in forestry (planting, thinning and harvesting);
ugotavlja, da sedanja merila biogoriva, ki jih je oblikovala Komisija, niso primerna za biomaso, in poziva k razvoju novih, zakonsko obveznih trajnostnih meril za biomaso, katere uporaba naj bi se spodbujala za pridobivanje energije; meni, da bi morala Komisija preučiti delo in ugotovitve konference Forest Europe, da bi razvila merila, ki bi upoštevala morebitna tveganja za izkrivljanje trga obnovljivih virov energije, se ne bi zanašala na domnevo o ogljični nevtralnosti, rešila vprašanje posrednih emisij in ne bi bila v nasprotju s cilji strategije EU 2020 glede energije iz obnovljivih virov in biotske raznovrstnosti; poudarja, da bi bilo treba natančno izvajanje teh meril prepustiti akterjem na lokalni ravni, saj bi upoštevali posebne razmere na terenu;
States that the current ’biofuel’ criteria developed by the Commission are not suitable in the case of biomass and calls for the development of new legally binding sustainability criteria for biomass promoted for the use of energy; states that the Commission should consult the work and the findings of Forest Europe so as to develop criteria which factor in possible risks of distortion in the renewable energy market, do not rely on the carbon neutrality assumption, address indirect emissions, and do not undermine the EU 2020 renewable energy and biodiversity targets; notes that detailed implementation of the criteria should be left to the local level, taking into account site-specific conditions;
poziva k uporabi opredelitev gozdov na podlagi ekološke klasifikacije gozdov, podobne tisti, ki jo je predlagala Evropska agencija za okolje leta 2007, da bi lahko razlikovali med starimi, z ogljikom bogatimi gozdovi, intenzivno upravljanimi monokulturami in drugimi tipi gozdov glede na biome in sukcesijske stopnje;
Calls for the application of forest definitions based on an ecological forest classification such as the one proposed by the EEA in 2007, so as to be able to differentiate between carbon-rich old forests, intensively managed monocultures and other forest types, including Mediterranean shrub, according to biomes and stages of succession;
poudarja pomen varstva raznolikosti gozdov v EU v vseh sukcesijskih stopnjah, da se zagotovi biotska raznovrstnost gozdov in v gozdovih, saj vsaka sukcesijska stopnja ustvarja pogoje za naslednjo in ker bi bila brez usklajenega varstva vseh stopenj sukcesija kasnejših resno ogrožena;
Stresses the importance of protecting the diversity of forests at all stages of succession within the EU, in order to ensure biodiversity of and within forests, as each stage of succession creates conditions for the following, and without concerted protection at all the various stages succession in the latter stages will be severely endangered;
poziva Komisijo in države članice k mednarodnemu delovanju, da se določi nova opredelitev gozdov OZN, ki bo razjasnila opredelitve naravnih gozdov na osnovi biomov ter razlikovala med avtohtonimi gozdovi in gozdovi, v katerih prevladujejo drevesne monokulture in tujerodne vrste; ob tem poudarja, da bi ta opredelitev močno povečala doslednost politike in realno vrednost denarja, saj je EU največja donatorica javne pomoči državam v razvoju (leta 2003 je bilo za gozdove namenjenih več kot 600 milijonov EUR); obžaluje, da v zeleni knjigi ni zabeležen napredek glede potrebe po usklajevanju ukrepov EU znotraj in zunaj Unije in potrebe po svetovnem pravno zavezujočem sporazumu v okviru foruma OZN o gozdovih;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to work internationally to establish a new UN definition of forests which clarifies natural forest definitions on a biome basis and distinguishes between native forests and those dominated by tree monocultures and non-native species; notes, in this respect that – the EU being the biggest public aid donor to developing countries (with the forest sector receiving more than EUR 600 million in 2003) – this definition would greatly enhance policy coherence and ’value for money’; regrets that the Green Paper fails to register progress on the need to coordinate EU actions within and outside the Union and to achieve a global legally binding agreement under the UN Forum on Forests;
ugotavlja, da je pomembno sodelovanje na svetovni ravni, tako na upravnem področju kot tudi na področju raziskav, pri določanju standardov, najboljše prakse ter pri prenosu tehnologije in znanstvenega znanja, zlasti v okviru sistema za zmanjšanje emisij zaradi krčenja in uničevanja gozdov (REDD); poudarja tudi, da pravične delitve ugodnosti iz tega sistema ni mogoče doseči brez aktivnega sodelovanja in izmenjave najboljše prakse; poudarja pomen programa globalnega nadzorovanja okolja in varnosti pri kartiranju, nadzoru in evidentiranju gozdnih površin na evropski in mednarodni ravni ter prispevka na ta način zbranih informacij k pogajanjem Združenih narodov o podnebnih spremembah;
Notes the importance of global cooperation, at both administrative and research level, on standard setting, best practices and transfers of technology and scientific know-how, especially in the context of the REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) system; also points out that fair sharing of the benefits of the REDD system cannot be achieved without active cooperation and the exchange of best practices; stresses the importance of the GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security) programme in the charting, surveillance and recording of forest areas at European and international level and the contribution that the information thus gathered can make to the UN negotiations on climate change;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. maja 2011 o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) v letu 2009, predloženem Evropskemu parlamentu v skladu z delom II, točko G, odstavka 43 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 ( 2010/2124(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 11 May 2011 on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament in application of Part II, Section G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 ( 2010/2124(INI) )
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) v letu 2009, predloženega Evropskemu parlamentu v skladu z delom II, točko G, odstavka 43 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 UL C 139, 14.6.2006, str.
having regard to the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2009, presented to the European Parliament pursuant to Part II, Section G, paragraph 43, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju,
having regard to the above-mentioned Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management,
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o letnih poročilih o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki za leto 2007 in 2008 z dne 19. februarja 2009 UL C 76 E, 25.3.2010, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 19 February 2009 OJ C 76 E, 25.3.2010, p.
in z dne 10. marca 2010 UL C 349 E, 22.12.2010, str.
and 10 March 2010 OJ C 349 E, 22.12.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. julija 2010 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0280 .
having regard to its resolution of 8 July 2010 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0280 .
o Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje,
on the European External Action Service,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. novembra 2010 o krepitvi organizacije OVSE – vloga EU Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0399 .
having regard to its resolution of 11 November 2010 on strengthening the OSCE: a role for the EU Texts adopted, P7_TAV(2010)0399.
ob upoštevanju izjave podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko o politični odgovornosti Prav tam, priloga II.
having regard to the declaration by the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR) on political accountability Ibid, Annex II.
ob upoštevanju izjave visoke predstavnice na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta o osnovni organizaciji osrednje uprave Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) z dne 8. julija 2010 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0280 , priloga.
having regard to the statement made by the High Representative in the plenary of the European Parliament on the basic organisation of the EEAS central administration on 8 July 2010 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0280 , annex.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 16. septembra 2010 o zunanjih odnosih EU,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 16 September 2010 on the EU's external relations,
ob upoštevanju člena 119(1) Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 119(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A7-0168/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0168/2011 ),
ker mora EU dodatno razvijati cilje svoje zunanje politike in po vsem svetu spodbujati svoje vrednote in interese, da bi prispevala k miru, varnosti, solidarnosti, preprečevanju konfliktov, spodbujanju demokracije, varovanju človekovih pravic, enakosti spolov, spoštovanju mednarodnega prava, podpiranju mednarodnih institucij, učinkoviti večstranskosti in medsebojnemu spoštovanju med narodi, trajnostnemu razvoju, svobodni in pošteni trgovini ter izkoreninjanju revščine,
whereas the EU should further develop its foreign policy objectives and advance its values and interests worldwide with the overall aim of contributing to peace, security, solidarity, conflict prevention, the promotion of democracy, the protection of human rights, gender equality, respect for international law, support for international institutions, effective multilateralism and mutual respect among nations, sustainable development, free and fair trade and the eradication of poverty,
ker izvajanje Lizbonske pogodbe prinaša novo razsežnost evropskemu zunanjemu delovanju in bo prispevalo h krepitvi skladnosti, povezanosti in učinkovitosti zunanje politike EU, ter obsežneje njenim zunanjim ukrepom,
whereas the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty is bringing a new dimension to European external action and will be instrumental in enhancing the coherence, consistency and effectiveness of EU foreign policy and, more broadly, external actions,
ker Lizbonska pogodba daje nov zagon zunanji politiki EU, zlasti z zagotavljanjem institucionalnih in operativnih orodij, ki bi Uniji lahko omogočila, da prevzame mednarodno vlogo, ki je sorazmerna z njenim zelo pomembnim gospodarskim statusom in njenimi prizadevanji, ter da se organizira tako, da bo uspešen svetovni akter, ki bo lahko prevzel del odgovornosti za svetovno varnost in prevzel vodstvo pri določanju skupnih odgovorov na skupne izzive,
whereas the Lisbon Treaty is creating a new momentum in EU foreign policy, notably providing institutional and operational tools which could enable the Union to take on an international role compatible with its prominent economic status and its ambitions and to organise itself in such a way as to be an effective global player, able to share responsibility for global security and take the lead in defining common responses to common challenges,
ker nov zagon evropskega zunanjega delovanja prav tako zahteva, da EU deluje bolj strateško, da bi tako lahko uveljavila svoj pomen na mednarodnem prizorišču; ker sposobnost EU, da vpliva na mednarodni red, ni odvisna zgolj od skladnosti njenih politik, akterjev in institucij, temveč tudi od dejanskega strateškega koncepta zunanje politike EU, ki mora združiti vse države članice v sklopu istega niza prednostnih nalog in ciljev, tako da bodo na mednarodnem prizorišču nastopile z odločnim enotnim stališčem; ker je treba zunanji politiki EU zagotoviti potrebna sredstva in instrumente za učinkovito in skladno delovanje Unije na svetovni ravni,
whereas the new momentum in European external action also requires the EU to act more strategically so as to bring its weight to bear internationally; whereas the EU's ability to influence the international order depends not only on coherence between its policies, actors and institutions, but also on a real strategic concept of EU foreign policy which must unite all Member States behind the same set of priorities and goals, so that they speak with a strong single voice in the international arena; whereas the EU foreign policy must be provided with the necessary means and instruments in order to enable the Union to act effectively and consistently on the world stage,
ker se s pojavom novih izzivov in novih političnih struktur odvija veliko preoblikovanje sedanjega mednarodnega reda, ki od EU zahteva, da dejavneje sodeluje z zdajšnjimi in novimi silami in nedržavnimi akterji, pa tudi z dvostranskimi in večstranskimi partnerji in institucijami, da bi spodbudila učinkovito reševanje problemov, ki so skupni evropskim in svetovnim državljanom ter ki bodo morda vplivali na svetovno varnost,
whereas a substantial transformation of the current international order is taking place with the emergence of new challenges and the creation of new power structures, requiring the EU to engage more actively with present and emerging powers and non-state actors as well as with bilateral and multilateral partners and institutions in order to promote effective solutions to problems which are common to European citizens and the world at large, and that might have an impact on global security,