natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za namene te uredbe se vsaka pravna določba, ki omejuje dopustne oblike razpolaganj za primer smrti s sklicevanjem na določene osebne okoliščine osebe, ki napravi razpolaganje, kot je na primer starost, obravnava kot formalno vprašanje.
For the purposes of this Regulation any provision of law limiting the permitted forms of dispositions of property upon death by reference to certain personal qualifications of the person making the disposition, such as, for instance, his age, should be deemed to pertain to matters of form.
predmet posebne ureditve ▌v državi članici, v kateri
in the Member State in which they are located
zagotoviti uporabo teh posebnih pravil
ensure the application of such special rules
, v skladu s katerimi za nepremičnine velja
conflict-of-laws rules subjecting immovable property to a law
pravo kot za premičnine,
from that applicable to movable property
niti določbe o nujnem deležu zapuščine
nor provisions providing for a
katerih dedovanje bi urejali različni pravni sistemi, pa ni gotov
it is uncertain in what
bi moralo biti
or more persons
da nobeden od teh zapustnikov nima dednih pravic po drugem ali drugih
rule providing that none of the deceased persons is to have any rights in the succession of the other or others
V določenih okoliščinah se lahko zgodi, da je zapuščina brez dediča.
In some situations an estate may be left without a claimant.
Po nekaterih pravih ima država na primer pravico do dedovanja, ne glede na to, kje se premoženje nahaja.
Under some laws, the State will be able to claim the vacant estate as an heir irrespective of where the assets are located.
Po nekaterih drugih pravih pa si lahko država prisvoji samo premoženje, ki je na njenem ozemlju.
Under some other laws, the State will be able to appropriate only the assets located on its territory.
V tej uredbi bi bilo zato treba določiti, da uporaba prava, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ne bi smela preprečevati državi članici, da si po svojem pravu prisvoji premoženje, ki je na njenem ozemlju.
This Regulation should therefore lay down a rule providing that the application of the law applicable to the succession should not preclude a Member State from appropriating under its own law the assets located on its territory.
Da bi zagotovili, da s tem pravilom ne bodo oškodovani upniki, ki imajo terjatve do zapuščine, bi bilo treba dodati določbo o tem, da lahko upniki, ki imajo terjatve do zapuščine, zahtevajo, da se te pobotajo s celotnim zapuščinskim premoženjem, ne glede na to, kje se nahaja.
However, to ensure that this rule is not detrimental to the creditors of the estate, a proviso should be added enabling the creditors to seek satisfaction of their claims out of all the assets of the estate, irrespective of their location.
Uporaba kolizijskih pravil iz te uredbe lahko pomeni, da se bo uporabilo pravo tretje države.
The conflict-of-laws rules laid down in this Regulation may lead to the application of the law of a third State.
Če je v teh pravilih določeno odkazovanje na pravo države članice ali pravo tretje države, ki bi za dedovanje uporabila svoje pravo, bi bilo treba zaradi mednarodne skladnosti takšno odkazovanje sprejeti.
If those rules provide for either renvoi to the law of a Member State or to the law of a third State which would apply its own law to the succession, such renvoi should be accepted in order to ensure international consistency.
očitno nezdružljiva
manifestly incompatible with
z javnim redom
the public policy of the
zadevne države članice
Member State concerned
Vendar sodišča ali drugi pristojni organi ne bi smeli imeti možnosti uporabe izjeme javnega reda, da bi zavrnili pravo druge države članice ali priznanje ali mogoče izvršitev izdane sodne odločbe, javne listine, sodne poravnave, izdanih v drugi državi članici, kadar bi bilo to v nasprotju z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti s členom 21 Listine, ki prepoveduje vsakršno diskriminacijo.
However, the courts or other competent authorities should not be able to apply the public-policy exception in order to set aside the law of another State or to refuse to recognise, or, as the case may be, accept or enforce a decision, an authentic instrument or a court settlement from another Member State when doing so would be contrary to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 21 thereof, which prohibits all forms of discrimination.
Glede na splošni cilj te uredbe, ki je vzajemno priznavanje sodnih odločb, izdanih v državah članicah v zapuščinskih
In the light of its general objective, which is the mutual recognition of decisions given in the Member States
ne glede na to, ali so bile takšne sodne odločbe izdane v pravdnem ali nepravdnem postopku
irrespective of whether such decisions were given in contentious or non-contentious proceedings
, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti pravila o priznavanju,
, this Regulation should lay down rules relating to the recognition,
in izvrševanju sodnih odločb,
and enforcement of decisions
podobnih tistim iz drugih instrumentov Unije s področja pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah
similar to those of other Union instruments in the area of judicial cooperation in civil matters
Javne listine bi morale imeti v drugi državi članici enako dokazno moč kot v državi članici izvora ali najbolj primerljive učinke.
Authentic instruments should have the same evidentiary effects in another Member State as they have in the Member State of origin, or the most comparable effects.
Zato bo dokazna moč javne listine v drugi državi članici odvisna od prava države članice izvora.
The evidentiary effects which a given authentic instrument should have in another Member State will therefore depend on the law of the Member State of origin.
Verodostojnost javne listine bi morala biti avtonomen pojem, ki naj zadeva vprašanja, kot so pristnost listine, zahteve glede obličnosti za listino, pooblastila organa, ki sestavi listino, in postopek, po katerem se listina sestavi.
The ‘authenticity’ of an authentic instrument should be an autonomous concept covering elements such as the genuineness of the instrument, the formal prerequisites of the instrument, the powers of the authority drawing up the instrument and the procedure under which the instrument is drawn up.
Vključevati bi moral tudi dejstva, ki jih v javno listino zapiše zadevni organ, kot je dejstvo, da sta se navedeni stranki določenega dne sestali v prisotnosti tega organa in dali navedene izjave.
It should also cover the factual elements recorded in the authentic instrument by the authority concerned, such as the fact that the parties indicated appeared before that authority on the date indicated and that they made the declarations indicated.
Stranka, ki želi izpodbijati verodostojnost javne listine, bi morala to storiti na pristojnem sodišču države članice, iz katere izvira javna listina, po pravu te države članice.
A party who wishes to challenge the authenticity of an authentic instrument should do so before the competent court in the Member State of origin of the authentic instrument under the law of that Member State.
Pojme „pravni posli ali pravna razmerja, zapisana v javni listini“ bi bilo treba razlagati kot sklicevanje na materialno vsebino javne listine.
The terms ‘the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument’ should be interpreted as referring to the substantive contents recorded in the authentic instrument.
Pravni posli, zapisani v javni listini, bi bili lahko na primer pogodba med strankama o delitvi zapuščine, oporoka ali dednopravna pogodba oziroma druga izjava volje.
The legal acts recorded in an authentic instrument could be, for instance, the agreement between the parties on the sharing-out or the distribution of the estate, or a will or an agreement as to succession, or another declaration of intent.
Pravna razmerja bi bila lahko na primer določitev dedičev in drugih upravičencev, določenih po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ter določitev njihovih deležev, obstoj nujnega deleža ali drugi elementi po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
The legal relationships could be, for instance, the determination of the heirs and other beneficiaries as established under the law applicable to the succession, their respective shares and the existence of a reserved share, or any other element established under the law applicable to the succession.
Stranka, ki želi izpodbijati pravne posle ali pravna razmerja, zapisana v javni listini, bi morala to storiti na sodiščih, pristojnih po tej uredbi, ki bi morala o tem odločati po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
A party wishing to challenge the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument should do so before the courts having jurisdiction under this Regulation, which should decide on the challenge in accordance with the law applicable to the succession.
Če je vprašanje, ki zadeva pravne posle ali pravna razmerja, zapisane v javni listini, obravnavano kot predhodno vprašanje na sodišču države članice, bi moralo biti za odločanje o tem vprašanju pristojno to sodišče.
If a question relating to the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument is raised as an incidental question in proceedings before a court of a Member State, that court should have jurisdiction over that question.
Izpodbijana javna listina ne bi smela imeti nobene dokazne moči v državi članici, ki ni država članica izvora, dokler postopek izpodbijanja ni končan.
An authentic instrument which is being challenged should not produce any evidentiary effects in a Member State other than the Member State of origin as long as the challenge is pending.
Če se izpodbija samo določena zadeva v zvezi s pravnimi posli ali pravnimi razmerji, zapisanimi v javni listini, izpodbijana javna listina v državi članici, ki ni država članica izvora, ne bi smela imeti nobene dokazne moči glede izpodbijane zadeve, dokler postopek izpodbijanja ni končan.
If the challenge concerns only a specific matter relating to the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in the authentic instrument, the authentic instrument in question should not produce any evidentiary effects in a Member State other than the Member State of origin with regard to the subject-matter of the challenge as long as the challenge is pending.
Organ, ki bi na podlagi uporabe te uredbe prejel neskladni javni listini, bi moral oceniti, katera od obeh, če sploh katera, naj ima prednost glede na okoliščine posamezne zadeve.
Where an authority, in the application of this Regulation, is presented with two incompatible authentic instruments, it should assess the question as to which authentic instrument, if any, should be given priority, taking into account the circumstances of the particular case.
Če iz teh okoliščin ni razvidno, katera od obeh javnih listin, če sploh katera, bi morala imeti prednost, bi morala o tem odločiti sodišča, ki so pristojna v skladu s to uredbo, ali – če se to vprašanje postavi kot predhodno vprašanje v postopku, sodišče, pred katerim teče ta postopek.
Where it is not clear from those circumstances which authentic instrument, if any, should be given priority, the question should be determined by the courts having jurisdiction under this Regulation, or, where the question is raised as an incidental question in the course of proceedings, by the court seised of those proceedings.
Če sta neskladni javna listina in sodna odločba, bi bilo treba upoštevati razloge za nepriznanje iz te uredbe.
In the event of incompatibility between an authentic instrument and a decision, regard should be had to the grounds of non-recognition of decisions under this Regulation.
s čezmejnimi posledicami
with cross-border implications
na primer v državi članici
, for instance in a Member State
je zapuščina.
enable them to do so,
dokumentov, ki se lahko za enak namen izdajajo
documents which may exist for similar purposes in
v državah članicah ▌.
the Member States ▌.
Organ, ki izda potrdilo, bi moral upoštevati obličnosti, ki so potrebne za registracijo nepremičnine v državi članici, kjer je register.
The authority which issues the Certificate should have regard to the formalities required for the registration of immoveable property in the Member State in which the register is kept.
Uporaba potrdila ne bi smela biti obvezna.
The use of the Certificate should not be mandatory.
Vendar pa noben organ ali oseba, ki se mu/ji predloži potrdilo, izdano v drugi državi članici, ne bi smela zahtevati, da se mu/ji namesto potrdila predloži sodna odločba, javna listina ali sodna poravnava.
However, no authority or person presented with a Certificate issued in another Member State should be entitled to request that a decision, authentic instrument or court settlement be presented instead of the Certificate.
Potrdilo bi morala izdati država članica, katere sodišča so pristojna v skladu s to uredbo.
The Certificate should be issued in the Member State whose courts have jurisdiction under this Regulation.
Države članice bi morale v nacionalni zakonodaji določiti, kateri organi bodo pristojni za izdajo potrdila, tj. bodisi sodišča, kot so opredeljena v tej uredbi, bodisi drugi organi, ki so pristojni za dedne zadeve, kot so na primer notarji.
It should be for each Member State to determine in its internal legislation which authorities are to have competence to issue the Certificate, whether they be courts as defined for the purposes of this Regulation or other authorities with competence in matters of succession, such as, for instance, notaries.
Potrdilo bi moralo imeti enake učinke v vseh državah članicah.
The Certificate should produce the same effects in all Member States.
Dokazni učinek potrdila ne bi smel vključevati elementov, ki ne spadajo na področje uporabe te uredbe, kot je na primer očetovstvo ali vprašanje, če je določeno premoženje pripadalo ali ne pokojniku.
The evidentiary effect of the Certificate should not extend to elements which are not governed by this Regulation, such as, for instance, questions of affiliation or the question whether or not a particular asset belonged to the deceased.
Vsakomur, ki izroči plačilo ali preda zapuščinsko premoženje osebi, ki je v potrdilu navedena kot upravičena, da prejme takšno plačilo ali premoženje kot dedič ali volilojemnik, bi bilo treba zagotoviti ustrezno zaščito, če je ravnal v dobri veri in se pri tem zanašal na to, da so informacije, navedene v potrdilu, točne.
Any person who makes payments or hands over succession property to a person indicated in the Certificate as being entitled to accept such payment or property as an heir or legatee should be afforded appropriate protection if he acted in good faith relying on the accuracy of the information certified in the Certificate.
Enako zaščito bi bilo treba zagotoviti vsakomur, ki se zanaša na to, da so informacije, navedene v potrdilu, točne, in ki kupi ali prejme premoženje od osebe, ki je v potrdilu navedena kot upravičena, da razpolaga s tem premoženjem.
The same protection should be afforded to any person who, relying on the accuracy of the information certified in the Certificate, buys or receives succession property from a person indicated in the Certificate as being entitled to dispose of such property.
Če so predložene overjene kopije, bi bilo treba zagotoviti zaščito.
The protection should be ensured if certified copies which are still valid are presented.
Pristojni organ bi moral izdati potrdilo na zahtevo.
The competent authority should issue the Certificate upon request.
Organ, ki ga je izdal, bi moral izvirnik potrdila obdržati, prosilcu zahtevka in vsem drugim osebam, ki izkažejo upravičeni interes, pa izdati eno ali več overjenih kopij.
The original of the Certificate should remain with the issuing authority, which should issue one or more certified copies of the Certificate to the applicant and to any other person demonstrating a legitimate interest.
To ne bi smelo preprečevati državam članicam, da v skladu z nacionalnimi pravili o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov dovolijo, da se kopije potrdila razkrijejo javnosti.
This should not preclude a Member State, in accordance with its national rules on public access to documents, from allowing copies of the Certificate to be disclosed to members of the public.
Če je bilo potrdilo popravljeno, spremenjeno ali preklicano, bi moral organ izdajatelj s tem seznaniti osebo, ki so ji bile izdane kopije, da bi se preprečila njihova nepravilna uporaba.
Where the Certificate is rectified, modified or withdrawn, the issuing authority should inform the persons to whom certified copies have been issued so as to avoid wrongful use of such copies.
Zlasti državam članicam, ki so pogodbenice Haaške konvencije z dne 5. oktobra 1961 o koliziji zakonov glede oblike oporočnih razpolaganj, bi moralo biti omogočeno, da za formalno veljavnost oporok in skupnih oporok še naprej uporabljajo določbe te konvencije namesto določb te uredbe.
In particular, the Member States which are Contracting Parties to the Hague Convention of 5 October 1961 on the Conflicts of Laws Relating to the Form of Testamentary Dispositions should be able to continue to apply the provisions of that Convention instead of the provisions of this Regulation with regard to the formal validity of wills and joint wills.
Ta uredba ne bi smela preprečevati, da države članice, ki so pogodbenice konvencije med Dansko, Finsko, Islandijo, Norveško in Švedsko z dne 19. novembra 1934, ki vsebuje določbe mednarodnega zasebnega prava o dedovanju, oporokah in upravljanju zapuščine, še naprej uporabljajo nekatere določbe iz te konvencije, kot je bila spremenjena z medvladnim sporazumom med državami pogodbenicami te konvencije.
This Regulation should not preclude Member States which are parties to the Convention of 19 November 1934 between Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden comprising international private law provisions on succession, wills and estate administration from continuing to apply certain provisions of that Convention, as revised by the intergovernmental agreement between the States parties thereto.
Za lažjo uporabo te uredbe je treba določiti obveznost, da države članice sporočijo nekatere podatke o
In order to facilitate the application of this Regulation, provision should be made for an obligation for the Member States to communicate certain information regarding their
svoji zakonodaji in postopkih v zvezi z dedovanjem
legislation and procedures relating to
Da bi lahko vse informacije, pomembne za uporabo te uredbe v praksi, pravočasno objavili v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, bi morale države članice takšne informacije Komisiji sporočiti pred začetkom uporabe te uredbe.
In order to allow for the timely publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of all information of relevance for the practical application of this Regulation, the Member States should also communicate such information to the Commission before this Regulation starts to apply.
Prav tako bi morali zaradi lažje uporabe te uredbe in da bi omogočili uporabo modernih komunikacijskih tehnologij pripraviti standardne obrazce za dokazila, ki se predložijo ob vložitvi zahtevkov za razglasitev izvršljivosti sodne odločbe, javne listine ali sodne poravnave in vložitvi zahtevka za izdajo evropskega potrdila o dedovanju ter za potrdilo samo.
Equally to facilitate the application of this Regulation and to allow for the use of modern communication technologies, standard forms should be prescribed for the attestations to be provided in connection with the application for a declaration of enforceability of a decision, authentic instrument or court settlement and for the application for a European Certificate of Succession as well as for the Certificate itself.
Pri izračunu rokov in iztekov rokov, določenih v tej uredbi, bi bilo treba uporabljati Uredbo Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 z dne 3. junija 1971 o določitvi pravil glede rokov, datumov in iztekov rokov
In calculating the periods and time-limits provided for in this Regulation, Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits
Za zagotovitev enotnih pogojev za izvajanje te uredbe bi bilo treba Komisiji podeliti izvedbena pooblastila.
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission.
Za sprejemanje izvedbenih aktov, s katerimi se sprejmejo in kasneje spreminjajo dokazila in obrazci
The advisory procedure should be used for the adoption of implementing acts establishing and subsequently amending the attestations and
členom 4 Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011
Ker ciljev te uredbe, tj. prosto gibanje oseb, možnost, da lahko evropski državljani vnaprej pripravijo svoje dedovanje na ravni
Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the free movement of persons, the organisation in advance by citizens of their succession in an EU ▌context and the
EU ter zaščita pravic
protection of the
dedičev in volilojemnikov
rights of heirs and legatees and
sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe
measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela iz Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
in drugi pristojni organi
and other competent authorities
držav članic morajo pri uporabi te uredbe upoštevati te pravice in načela.
of the Member States in observance of those rights and principles.
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland
glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice
in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice,
ti dve državi članici ne sodelujeta
those Member States are not taking part
Vendar to ne posega v možnost, da
This is, however,
Združeno kraljestvo in Irska
without prejudice to
v skladu s členom 4
Article 4 of the
V skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola o stališču Danske, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty
zavezujoča niti se zanjo ne uporablja –,
bound by it or subject to its application,
Področje uporabe in opredelitev pojmov
Scope and definitions
status fizičnih oseb ter družinska razmerja in razmerja
the status of natural persons, as well as family relationships and relationships
, ki imajo primerljiv učinek po pravu, ki se uporablja za takšna razmerja
deemed by the law applicable to such relationships to have comparable effects
pravno ali poslovno sposobnost fizičnih oseb,
the legal capacity of natural persons,
brez poseganja v točko (c) člena
without prejudice to point (c) of
in člen 19c
and to Article 19c
fizične osebe;
presumed death of a natural person;
po pravu, ki se uporablja za takšna razmerja,
by the law applicable to such relationships
primerljiv učinek kot zakonska zveza;
to have comparable effects to marriage;
preživninske obveznosti
maintenance obligations
, ki ne izhajajo iz smrti
other than those arising by reason of death
formalno veljavnost ustnega razpolaganja za primer smrti;
the formal validity of dispositions of property upon death made orally;
na primer
right of
brez poseganja vtočko (j) člena
without prejudice to point (j) of
in drugih subjektov s pravno osebnostjo ali brez nje
memoranda of association and articles of association
, ki določajo, kaj se zgodi z deleži ob smrti
of companies and other bodies, corporate or unincorporated, which determine
vpis pravic na nepremičnini ali premičnini v register, vključno s pravnimi zahtevami za takšen vpis, niti za učinke vpisa ali nevpisa takšnih pravic v register.
any recording in a register of rights in immovable or movable property, including the legal requirements for such recording, and the effects of recording or failing to record such rights in a register.
Pristojnost za zapuščinske zadeve v državah članicah
Competence in matters of succession within the Member States
zaradi smrti lastnika, ne glede na to, ali gre za
of death,