natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da bi morali imeti evropski javni prostori lastno proračunsko vrstico, saj bi tako zagotovili preglednost ter polno vključenost Evropskega parlamenta in njegovih poslancev; obžaluje, da je Komisija predlagala, da se ta vrstica izprazni in sredstva za evropske javne prostore združijo z vrstico predstavništev Komisije; opozarja, da evropske javne prostore skupaj upravljata Komisija in Parlament, zato bi moral biti njihov proračun ločen od proračuna za predstavništva Komisije, kakor je navedeno v proračunu za leti 2010 in 2011; poudarja, da Parlament ne bo toleriral poskusov spremembe volje proračunskih organov v zvezi s tem;
Recalls that, in order to ensure transparency and full involvement of the European Parliament and its Members, European Public Spaces need to have their own separate line; regrets the Commission proposal to empty this line and to merge the EPS allocations with the Commission Representations' line; recalls that the European Public Spaces are run jointly by the Commission and the Parliament and therefore their budget should be separated from the Commission Representations' budget as reflected in the 2010 and 2011budgets; underlines that Parliament will not accept any attempt to change the will of the budgetary authorities in this matter;
ugotavlja, da so proračunska sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in plačila v predlogu proračuna za leto 2012 večja za 2,9 % oziroma 0,8 % v primerjavi s proračunom za leto 2011, in sicer znašajo 9 009,3 milijona EUR oziroma 7 293,7 milijona EUR (ob upoštevanju rezerve za nujno pomoč); poudarja, da je to povečanje manjše, kot ga Komisija predlaga za proračun kot celoto;
Notes that the commitment and payment appropriations requested in the DB 2012 have increased by 2,9% and 0,8%, as compared to the 2011 Budget, to EUR 9 009.3 and EUR 7 293,7 million respectively (account being taken of the Emergency Aid reserve); points out that these increases remain below the increase proposed by the Commission for the Budget as a whole;
je trdno prepričan, da so potrebna posebna in konkretna prizadevanja za optimalno in usklajeno uporabo vseh razpoložljivih evropskih instrumentov (ne le finančnih sredstev v proračunu EU, temveč tudi instrumentov, ki jih upravljajo EIB, EBRD itd.) in ukrepov držav članic; poudarja, da je treba še bolj povečati prilagodljivost pri načrtovanju in izvajanju instrumentov EU, da se omogoči ustrezen in učinkovit odgovor na politične in humanitarne krize v tretjih državah, ne da bi bile pri tem ogrožene dolgoročne politične zaveze in prednostne naloge; s tem v zvezi upa, da bodo Evropska komisija, Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje in Evropska investicijska banka uskladile prizadevanja, da bi bili evropski cilji zunaj Unije bolje usmerjeni in učinkovitejši;
Is firmly convinced that a particular and concrete effort must be made to make optimal, coordinated use of all European instruments available (not only financial envelopes within the EU budget, but also instruments managed by the EIB, EBRD etc.) and Member State actions; emphasises that flexibility in the programming and implementation of the EU instruments must be further improved to allow an adequate and effective response to political and humanitarian crises in third countries without, however, jeopardising long-term political commitments and priorities; calls, to this end, for the Commission, the European External Action Service and the European Investment Bank to coordinate their efforts with a view to ensuring that the objectives of EU external action are as targeted and effective as possible;
meni, da je EU dolžna ustrezno in izčrpno odgovoriti na nedavne politične dogodke v sosedskih sredozemskih državah ter ponuditi podporo in pomoč gibanjem za demokratične vrednote in vzpostavitev pravne države; znova poudarja, da povečanje finančne pomoči tem državam ne sme negativno vplivati na prednostne naloge in instrumente v korist sosedskih vzhodnoevropskih držav;
Believes it to be the EU's duty to respond adequately and comprehensively to recent political developments in Mediterranean neighbouring countries and to provide support and assistance to movements fighting for democratic values and the establishment of the rule of law; reiterates that reinforcement of financial assistance to these countries must not be detrimental to priorities and instruments for the benefit of neighbouring Eastern European countries;
s tega vidika je zelo zaskrbljen, da predlagana razlika do zgornje meje v znesku 246,7 milijona EUR v razdelku 4 – čeprav je precej večja, kot je bilo predvideno pri posodobitvi finančnega načrta januarja 2011 (132,2 milijona EUR) – morda ne bo zadostovala za čedalje večje potrebe v tem razdelku, saj izvira iz zmanjšanja sredstev za nekatere glavne programe EU; je odločen, da bo učinek tega zmanjšanja dodatno preveril in analiziral;
Is very concerned from this point of view that the proposed margin of EUR 246,7 million for Heading 4, while far above that foreseen by the January 2011 update of the financial programming (EUR 132,2 million), may be insufficient to address the new needs under Heading 4, since it seems to be based on cuts to some major EU programmes; is determined to further check and analyse the impact of these cuts;
opozarja, da se Parlament in Svet še nista sporazumela o pravni podlagi spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane in sodelovanja z industrijsko razvitimi državami in drugimi državami z visokim dohodkom (ICI +) ter da bo imel ta dogovor posledice za proračun 2012; obžaluje predlog Komisije o zmanjšanju sredstev za sodelovanje z državami v razvoju iz Azije in Latinske Amerike; poziva k hitremu sprejetju zakonodaje ICI+ in odobritvi ustreznega financiranja za Azijo in Latinsko Ameriko;
Recalls that Parliament and Council have still not agreed on the legal basis for Banana Accompanying Measures and Cooperation with Industrialised and other High-Income Countries (ICI +) and that this agreement will have an impact on Budget 2012 appropriations; regrets the Commission's proposal to cut funding for the cooperation with developing countries in Asia and Latin America ; calls for a swift adoption of the ICI+ legislation and for an endorsement of adequate funding for Asia and Latin America;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj prihodnjega pisnega predloga spremembe proračuna ne omeji le na proračunske posledice pregleda evropske sosedske politike, temveč naj upošteva tudi –po potrebi z uporabo vseh sredstev, ki jih ponuja medinstitucionalni sporazum – vsa druga nerešena vprašanja in potrebe, vključno s financiranjem Palestine in UNRWA, ki se je v primerjavi s proračunom za leto 2011 zmanjšalo za 100 milijonov EUR, da se poveča učinek pomoči EU v svetu;
Asks the Commission, therefore, not to limit its upcoming amending letter to the budgetary consequences of its review of the European Neighbourhood Policy but also to address, if necessary together with the use of all the means provided for by the IIA, all other outstanding issues and needs, including the financing of Palestine and UNRWA, which is decreased by EUR 100 million as compared to 2011 Budget, in order to maximise the impact of EU assistance in the world;
obžaluje zmanjšanje načrtovanega povečanja financiranja za instrument za predpristopno pomoč s 139 milijonov EUR na samo 79 milijonov EUR v primerjavi s proračunom 2011;
Deplores the reduction of the programmed increase in the funding for the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance from EUR 139 million to only EUR 79 million, as compared to Budget 2011;
je seznanjen s predlaganim povečanjem sredstev za okolje in trajnostno upravljanje naravnih virov v okviru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje (DCI) za 51,8 milijona EUR v primerjavi s finančnim načrtom, ki bo namenjeno financiranju hitrega začetka ukrepov proti podnebnim spremembam; odločno nasprotuje vsem drugim zmanjšanjem sredstev za geografske programe DCI, ki skupaj znašajo 78 milijonov EUR in ki so v nasprotju s prizadevanjem EU, da bi prispevala k uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja in spoštovala svojo zavezo na najvišji ravni, da bo do leta 2015 dosegla cilj 0,7% BND za razvojno sodelovanje;
Notes the proposed increase in the funding of environment and sustainable management of natural resources (ENRTP) under the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) by EUR 51.8 million as compared to financial programming in order to address the fast-start climate change action; strongly opposes the other decreases, amounting to EUR 78 million overall, made to DCI geographical programmes, which would run counter to the EU effort to contribute to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals and respect the EU commitment, at the highest level, to reaching the 0,7% of GNI target by 2015 for development cooperation;
opozarja, da bo odločno zavrnil morebitna sistematična, navidez samodejna in včasih nepremišljena zmanjšanja, ki jih bo druga veja proračunskega organa izvedla pri upravnih odhodkih v razdelku 4 izključno z namenom varčevanja s proračunskimi sredstvi, saj tako EU ne bo mogla ustrezno in učinkovito izvajati svojih programov;
Recalls that it will firmly reject any systematic, quasi-automatic and sometimes unconsidered cuts by the other branch of the budgetary authority in administrative expenditure under Heading 4 for the sole sake of decreasing appropriations, since this would deprive the EU of its means to properly and efficiently implement its programmes;
ugotavlja, da so skupni upravni odhodki za vse institucije ocenjeni na 8 281 milijonov EUR, kar je za 1,3 % več kot v letu 2011, pri čemer razlika do zgornje meje znaša 472,5 milijona EUR;
Notes that total administrative expenditure for all institutions is estimated at EUR 8 281 million, representing an increase of 1,3% as compared to 2011, leaving a margin of EUR 472,5 million;
je seznanjen s pismom komisarja za finančno načrtovanje in proračun z dne 3. februarja 2011, v katerem se je zavezal, da povečanje odhodkov v razdelku 5 ne bo preseglo 1 % in da ne bodo zaposleni dodatni uslužbenci v primerjavi z letom 2011, in poziva vse institucije, naj uporabijo podoben pristop, kar zadeva razvoj njihovih proračunov;
Notes the letter from the Commissioner for Financial Programming and Budget of 3 February 2011 committing to an increase in Heading 5 expenditure below 1% and no new staff as compared to 2011 and calling upon all institutions to follow the same approach as regards the evolution of their budgets;
ugotavlja, da so Komisija, Svet, Računsko sodišče, Evropski varuh človekovih pravic in Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov sledili temu zgledu; poudarja, da je Evropskemu parlamentu uspelo zmanjšati načrt lastnih odhodkov za približno 50 milijonov EUR v primerjavi s prvim predhodnim predlogom načrta odhodkov; poudarja, da bo podrobno preučil načrte prihodkov in odhodkov drugih institucij, med drugim glede na dodatne potrebe in dejavnosti v zvezi z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe;
Observes that the Commission, the Council, the Court of Auditors, the Ombudsman and the Data Protection Supervisor have followed suit; underlines that the European Parliament has succeeded to reduce its own estimates by around 50 mio EUR compared to the first proposal of preliminary draft estimates; stresses that it will scrutinise in depth the other institutions' estimates, inter alia against the additional needs and activities related to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty;
priznava velika prizadevanja Komisije, da bi zamrznila upravne odhodke v nominalnem smislu; ugotavlja, da ji je to uspelo samo tako, da je povečanje, izhajajoče iz zakonskih in pogodbenih obveznosti, izravnala s korenitim zmanjšanjem drugih upravnih odhodkov; je vseeno zaskrbljen zaradi morebitnih posledic;
Acknowledges the Commission's great effort to freeze its own administrative expenditure in nominal terms; notes that this was rendered possible through the offsetting of the increases linked to statutory and contractual obligations against other drastic cuts in other administrative expenditure; is nevertheless concerned about the possible consequences;
poudarja, da bi utegnilo imeti morebitno nadaljnje zmanjševanje upravnih odhodkov za leto 2012 v oddelku III, vključno z vrsticami za upravno podporo (nekdanjimi vrsticami BA), negativen učinek na izvajanje programov, zlasti glede na nove naloge EU po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe; vztraja, da morajo prihranki na račun zmanjšanja odhodkov za upravno podporo ostati v proračunih ustrezajočih programov za izboljšano izvajanje na terenu; prav tako poudarja, da tega trenda dolgoročno ne bo mogoče ohranjati, saj se pristojnosti EU vse bolj povečujejo, sicer bo imel negativne posledice za nemoteno, redno in učinkovito izvajanje ukrepov in programov EU;
Stresses that any further cut to 2012 administrative appropriations within Section III, including to the administrative support expenditure lines (former BA-lines), might have an adverse impact on the implementation of programmes, in particular in view of the new EU tasks following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty; insists that the savings resulting from reduced administrative support expenditure remain within the corresponding programmes' financial envelopes for enhanced delivery on the ground; emphasises, furthermore, that while EU competences keep on increasing, this trend is not sustainable in the long term and will have an adverse impact on the swift, regular and effective implementation of EU actions and programmes;
poudarja, da je predlagano povečanje za EPSO (+5,4 % v sredstvih za prevzem obveznosti in sredstvih za plačila), kot kaže, v nasprotju s prizadevanji Komisije za zmanjšanje upravnih odhodkov; zahteva več informacij o predlaganem povečanju sredstev za EPSO in o oddajanju osrednjih storitev, ki jih zagotavlja EPSO, zunanjim izvajalcem;
Underlines that the increase proposed for EPSO (+5,4% in CA and PA) seems to contradict the Commission's efforts to reduce administrative expenditure; requests more information on the proposed increase of EPSO's allocations and on the externalization by EPSO of key services;
je seznanjen s povečanjem odhodkov za pokojnine za 4 % (v primerjavi s +5,2 % od leta 2010 do leta 2011) zaradi vala upokojitev uradnikov; poziva Komisijo, naj izvede podrobnejšo analizo dolgoročnih proračunskih posledic tega trenda, hkrati pa razmisli o posrednih ali neposrednih posledicah morebitnih sprememb pokojninskega programa EU za privlačnost, kakovost in neodvisnost evropske javne službe; poudarja, da mora pred takšnimi spremembami potekati socialni dialog;
Notes the 4% increase in expenditure on pensions (as against +5,2% from 2010 to 2011) in view of the wave of retirements of officials; invites the Commission to supply a more in-depth analysis of the long-term budgetary consequences of this trend, while at the same time considering the possible consequences, whether direct and indirect, of any change in the EU pension scheme on the attractiveness, quality and independence of the European civil service; stresses that any such change should follow due social dialogue;
meni, da je treba evropske šole ustrezno financirati, da bo mogoče obravnavati posebni položaj otrok uradnikov v institucijah EU; namerava natančno preučiti predlagano skupno povečanje za 1,7 % v primerjavi z letom 2011, kar je manj, kot je bilo predvideno v finančnem načrtu, in proračunske vrstice vseh evropskih šol ter med obravnavo uvesti spremembe, ki se mu bodo zdele primerne;
Takes the view that the European Schools should be adequately funded in the interests of addressing the specific situation of the children of agents of the EU institutions; will carefully scrutinise the proposed overall 1,7% increase as compared to 2011, which is below that foreseen in the financial programming, as well as each of the European Schools' budget lines, and make, during its reading, any modification it considers appropriate in this respect;
Pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi
Pilot projects – preparatory actions
poudarja, da so pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi bistvena orodja za oblikovanje političnih prednostnih nalog in za tlakovanje poti novim pobudam, ki bi lahko postale dejavnosti in programi EU za boljše življenje državljanov EU; zato namerava z vsemi razpoložljivi sredstvi podpreti svoje predloge glede pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov v proračunu za leto 2012, hkrati pa poudarja, da je treba natančno preučiti predhodno oceno Komisije, ki bo pripravljena julija 2011, da se opredeli celovit in uravnotežen končni paket na tem področju;
Stresses that pilot projects (PPs) and preparatory actions (PAs) are key tools for the formulation of political priorities and for paving the way for new initiatives that might turn into EU activities and programmes likely to improve the lives of EU citizens; intends, therefore, to support by all possible means its proposals regarding pilot projects and preparatory actions for the 2012 Budget, while stressing the need carefully to study the Commission's preliminary assessment expected in July 2011 for the definition of a global and balanced final package on this issue;
zato namerava Komisiji posredovati prvi začasni seznam morebitnih pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov za proračun 2012, kot je predvideno v prilogi II dela D medinstitucionalnega sporazuma; pričakuje, da bo Komisija pripravila dobro utemeljeno analizo okvirnega predloga Parlamenta; poudarja, da prvi začasni seznam ni ovira za uradno vložitev in sprejetje osnutkov dopolnitve glede pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov med obravnavo proračuna v Parlamentu;
Intends to this end to forward to the Commission, as provided for in Annex II, part D of the IIA, a first provisional list of potential pilot projects and preparatory actions for the 2012 Budget; expects the Commission to provide a well-reasoned analysis of Parliament's indicative proposals; stresses that this first provisional list does not preclude the formal tabling and adoption of amendments concerning pilot projects and preparatory actions during Parliament's reading of the budget;
je seznanjen z enim novim pilotnim projektom in petimi pripravljalnimi ukrepi – od tega sta dva nova –, ki jih je Komisija predlagala v različnih razdelkih; izraža odločno namero, da bo med bližajočimi se pogajanji analiziral vsebino in cilje novih predlaganih pobud;
Takes note of one new pilot project and five preparatory actions – two of them new – proposed by the Commission under different headings; states its firm intention of analysing the content and objectives of the newly proposed initiatives in the course of the upcoming negotiations;
in sedmim agencijam v začetni fazi delovanja Urad Organa evropskih regulatorjev za elektronske komunikacije (BEREC), Evropski bančni organ (EBA), Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine (EIOPA), Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge (ESMA), Agencija za sodelovanje energetskih regulatorjev (ACER), Evropski urad za podporo azilu (EASO) in Evropski inštitut za enakost med spoloma.
and seven phasing-in agencies The Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC – Office), European Banking Authority (EBA), European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), European Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), European Asylum Support Office (EASO) and Gender Institute
zagotovi zadostna finančna sredstva; poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti dodatno financiranje za deset agencij Evropska agencija za kemikalije (ECHA) – dejavnosti v zvezi z biocidi, Evropska agencija za kemikalije (ECHA) – dejavnosti v zvezi s soglasjem po predhodnem obveščanju, Evropski nadzorni organ za GNSS (GSA), Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu (EASA), Evropska agencija za pomorsko varnost (EMSA), Evropska agencija za varnost omrežij in informacij (ENISA), Evropska agencija za zdravila (EMA), Evropska agencija za okolje (EEA), Agencija Evropske unije za temeljne pravice (FRA), Evropska policijska akademija (CEPOL) in Eurojust.
, with a view to providing them with adequate funding; underlines the importance of additional funding for those 10 agencies European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Biocides activities, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Prior Informed Consent (PIC) activities, European GNSS Supervisory Agency (GSA), European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA), European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), European Environment Agency (EEA), Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA), European Police College (CEPOL) and Eurojust.
, katerih naloge so bile razširjene, da se omogoči njihovo nemoteno delovanje; ugotavlja, da je povečanje prispevka EU za agencije, ki so že povsem operativne, v skladu s popravkom zaradi inflacije (2 %) ali je celo manjše, brez dodatnih uslužbencev;
, the tasks of which have been extended, so as not to hinder their performance; notes that the increase in the EU contribution to the agencies at cruising speed is in line with, or even below, inflation correction (2%), with no additional staff;
poudarja, da proračunska sredstva agencij EU še zdaleč niso sestavljena samo iz upravnih odhodkov, temveč prispevajo k doseganju ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 in ciljev EU nasploh, kot jih določi zakonodajni organ; zato v obdobju varčevanja podpira omejevalen pristop Komisije pri določanju subvencij decentraliziranih agencij EU iz proračuna EU, ponovno pa se ne strinja z uporabo namenskih prejemkov za zmanjšanje prispevka iz proračuna EU za agencije, ki so odvisne od pristojbin, s čimer je Komisija umetno povečala razlike do zgornje meje, ter je v zvezi s tem zaskrbljen, da Komisija vedno znova ne upošteva politične volje Evropskega parlamenta;
Stresses that EU agencies' budget allocations are far from consisting in administrative expenditure alone, but instead contribute to achieving the Europe 2020 goals and EU objectives in general, as decided by the legislative authority; endorses therefore, in times of austerity, the Commission's restrictive approach to determining EU decentralised agencies' subsidies from the EU budget, but disapproves again of the use of assigned revenue to reduce the EU Budget contribution to fee-dependent agencies, which is used by the Commission to increase margins artificially, is in this context concerned that the Commission repeatedly ignores the political will of the European Parliament;
poudarja, da bodo evropski nadzorni organi morali imeti ključno vlogo pri zaščiti stabilnosti trga ter da jih je treba ustrezno financirati, da bi zakonodajne reforme lahko bile učinkovite; znova poudarja, da bi en sam nadzorni organ omogočil večjo stroškovno učinkovitost; pozdravlja povečanja proračunskih sredstev za vse tri organe kot pomemben korak pri njihovih razvojnih postopkih in poziva k dodelitvi dodatnih sredstev za skupni odbor; poudarja, da mora vse dodatne naloge, dodeljene tem organom, obenem spremljati ustrezna dodelitev dodatnih sredstev; med drugim poudarja, da se morajo nove pristojnosti, načrtovane za Evropski organ za vrednostne papirje in trge (ESMA) v zvezi s prodajo na kratko in izvedenimi finančnimi instrumenti nemudoma odraziti v proračunskem postopku za leto 2012, takoj ko bo vzpostavljena pravna podlaga;
Stresses that the European Supervisory Authorities have a crucial role to play in safeguarding market stability and that they need to be adequately funded in order for regulatory reforms to be effective; reiterates that one single supervisory authority would be more cost-efficient; welcomes the budget increases proposed for all three authorities as important steps in their build-up procedures, while calling for additional resources for the joint committee; emphasises that any additional tasks entrusted to these authorities must be swiftly accompanied by the corresponding allocation of supplementary resources; underlines, inter alia, that the new responsibilities planned for the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) in the areas of short-selling and derivatives must be promptly reflected in the 2012 budget procedure as soon as the legal bases are in place;