natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je potreba po izboljšanju pravnega sredstva sodne prepovedi še posebej velika v okoljskem sektorju; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči načine, da bi to pravno sredstvo zagotovili tudi v tem sektorju;
Takes the view that the need to improve injunctive relief remedies is particularly great in the environmental sector; calls on the Commission to explore ways of extending relief to that sector;
meni, da se je treba pri sodni prepovedi osredotočiti na zaščito interesa posameznika in javnega interesa, in poziva k previdnosti, ko gre za razširitev dostopa do sodnega varstva za organizacije, saj slednjim ne bi smel biti omogočen lažji dostop do sodnega varstva kot pa posameznikom;
Considers that injunctive relief should focus on the protection of both the individual interest and the public interest, and calls for caution to be exercised when widening access to justice for organisations, since organisations should not enjoy easier access to justice than individuals;
zaradi tega poziva Komisijo, naj dodatno okrepi in poveča učinkovitost obstoječih instrumentov, kakršna sta Direktiva 98/27/ES o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov in Uredba (ES) št. 2006/2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov, da bi zagotovila ustrezno javno izvrševanje pravic potrošnikov v EU; kljub temu poudarja, da niti Direktiva 98/27/ES niti Uredba (ES) št. 2006/2004 ne predvidevata nadomestila za povzročeno škodo potrošnikom;
Calls therefore on the Commission to strengthen and increase the effectiveness of existing instruments such as Directive 98/27/EC on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws, in order to ensure appropriate public enforcement of consumers' rights in the EU; emphasises, nonetheless, the fact that neither Directive 98/27/EC nor Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 allows consumers to be compensated for the damage suffered;
Pravno zavezujoči horizontalni okvir in zaščitni ukrepi
Legally binding horizontal framework and safeguards
meni, da dostop do sodnega varstva s pomočjo skupinskih tožb spada na področje postopkovnega prava in ga skrbi, da bi neusklajene pobude EU na področju kolektivnih tožb privedle do razdrobljenosti nacionalnih predpisov o postopkih in odškodnini, kar bi oslabilo, ne pa krepilo dostop do sodnega varstva v EU; če bi bila po temeljitem premisleku sprejeta odločitev, da je sistem EU za kolektivne tožbe zaželen in potreben, poziva, naj bodo vsi predlogi s področja kolektivnih tožb v obliki horizontalnega okvira, ki bo vključeval skupna načela in nudil enoten dostop do sodnega varstva preko kolektivnih tožb po Evropski uniji ter še posebej, vendar ne tudi izrecno, obravnaval kršitve pravic potrošnikov;
Takes the view that access to justice by means of collective redress comes within the sphere of procedural law and is concerned that uncoordinated EU initiatives in the field of collective redress will result in a fragmentation of national procedural and damages laws, which will weaken and not strengthen access to justice within the EU; calls, in the event that it is decided after detailed consideration that a Union scheme of collective redress is needed and desirable, for any proposal in the field of collective redress to take the form of a horizontal framework including a common set of principles providing uniform access to justice via collective redress within the EU and specifically but not exclusively dealing with the infringement of consumers' rights;
poudarja, da je treba ustrezno upoštevati pravno tradicijo in pravno ureditev posameznih držav članic in okrepiti usklajevanje primerov dobre prakse med državami članicami ter meni, da je delo na shemi EU za spodbujanje učinkovitih pravnih sredstev, namenjenih posameznikom in malim in srednjim podjetjem, ne bi smelo povzročiti zamude pri sprejetju horizontalnega okvira;
Stresses the need to take due account of the legal traditions and legal orders of the individual Member States and enhance the coordination of good practices between Member States, and believes that the work on an EU scheme fostering effective relief for both consumers and SMEs should not cause delays in the adoption of the horizontal framework;
poudarja, da mora vsak pravno zavezujoči horizontalni okvir zajemati temeljne vidike kolektivnega uveljavljanja odškodnin; nadalje vztraja, da morajo za kolektivne tožbe veljati zlasti postopkovni predpisi in predpisi mednarodnega zasebnega prava na splošno, ne glede na vrsto sektorja, medtem ko bi lahko bila omejena sektorska pravila v zvezi z varstvom potrošnikov ali konkurenčnim pravom, ki zadevajo vprašanja, kot so morebitne zavezujoče posledice odločitev, ki jih sprejmejo nacionalni organi za konkurenco na področju konkurenčnega prava EU, določena v ločenih členih ali poglavjih samega horizontalnega okvira ali z ločenimi pravnimi instrumenti vzporedno ali po sprejetju horizontalnega instrumenta;
Stresses that any legally binding horizontal framework must cover the core aspects of obtaining damages collectively; further stresses that, in particular, procedural and international private law issues must apply to collective actions in general irrespective of the sector concerned, while a limited number of rules relevant to consumer protection or competition law, dealing with matters such as the potential binding effect of decisions adopted by national competition authorities, could be laid down, for instance, in separate articles or chapters of the horizontal instrument itself or in separate legal instruments in parallel or subsequent to the adoption of the horizontal instrument;
meni, da igra škoda ali izguba, ki jo utrpi posameznik, ključno vlogo pri odločitvi o vložitvi tožbe, saj jo vsak neizogibno primerja z morebitnimi stroški postopkov pri tožbi; opozarja Komisijo, da mora biti horizontalni okvir za kolektivne tožbe zmogljivo in stroškovno učinkovito orodje za vse stranke in meni, da bi se lahko pravila nacionalnih postopkov držav članic zgledovala po Uredbi (ES) št. 861/2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti kot referenci v zadevah kolektivnih tožb, kadar vrednost zahtevka ni zunaj njenega področja uporabe;
Believes that the individual damage or loss suffered plays a pivotal role when deciding to file an action as these are inevitably compared with the potential costs of proceeding with an action; reminds the Commission, therefore, of the need for a horizontal framework on collective redress to be an efficient and cost-effective tool for all parties and takes the view that national procedural rules in Member States could use Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure as a reference for the purposes of collective redress in cases where the value of the claim does not exceed that regulation's scope;
meni, da bi bile kolektivne tožbe v okviru horizontalnega instrumenta najbolj učinkovite, kadar obtoženec in zastopane žrtve nimajo sedeža oziroma prebivališča v isti državi članici (čezmejni značaj) in kadar so pravice, ki so bile domnevno kršene, predpisane z zakonodajo EU (kršitev prava EU); poziva k nadaljnji preučitvi načinov za izboljšanje pravnih sredstev v primerih pri kršitev nacionalnega prava, ki imajo lahko daljnosežne, čezmejne posledice;
Considers that collective action under a horizontal framework would deliver the most benefit in cases where the defendant and victims represented are not domiciled in the same Member State (cross-border dimension) and where the rights alleged to have been infringed are granted by EU legislation (infringement of EU law); calls for further examination of how to improve redress in cases of infringements of national law which may have large, cross-border implications;
ponavlja, da je treba znotraj horizontalnega instrumenta uvesti zaščitne ukrepe, da bi se izognili neupravičenim zahtevkom in zlorabi kolektivnih tožb ter zagotovili pravične sodne postopke, ter poudarja, da morajo zaščitni ukrepi med drugim zajemati sledeče:
Reiterates that safeguards must be put in place within the horizontal instrument in order to avoid unmeritorious claims and misuse of collective redress, so as to guarantee fair court proceedings, and stresses that such safeguards must cover, inter alia, the following points:
zastopniška tožba je dopustna, če obstaja natančno identificirana skupina, identifikacija članov skupine pa je opravljena pred vložitvijo tožbe;
for a representative action to be admissible there must be a clearly identified group, and identification of the group members must have taken place before the claim is brought;
evropski pristop h kolektivnim pravnim sredstvom je treba oblikovati na podlagi načela sodelovanja, pri čemer morajo biti oškodovanci jasno opredeljeni in sodelovati v postopku le, če si to izrecno želijo, da bi se preprečile morebitne zlorabe; poudarja, da je treba v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti spoštovati obstoječe nacionalne sisteme; poziva Komisijo, naj pretehta vzpostavitev sistema, ki bi zagotavljal ustrezno obveščenost vseh potencialnih oškodovancev, povečal reprezentativnost skupinskih tožb in omogočil čim večjemu številu oškodovancev, da zahtevajo odškodnino, ter zagotovil enostaven, cenovno ustrezen in učinkovit dostop do sodnega varstva za državljane EU, s čimer bi preprečili pretirano število sodnih sporov, kasneje pa tudi nepotrebne posamične ali skupinske tožbe zaradi iste kršitve; poziva države članice, naj vzpostavijo učinkovite mehanizme za obveščanje čim večjega števila oškodovancev, da bodo poznali svoje pravice in obveznosti, kar zlasti velja za oškodovance, ki imajo bivališče ali sedež v različnih državah članicah, pri čemer pa zaradi upoštevanja domneve nedolžnosti ne smejo neupravičeno škodovati ugledu strank;
the European approach to collective redress must be founded on the opt-in principle, whereby victims are clearly identified and take part in the procedure only if they have expressly indicated their wish to do so, in order to avoid potential abuses; underlines the need to respect existing national systems, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity; calls on the Commission to consider a system which will provide relevant information to all potential victims involved, increase the representativeness of collective actions, allow for the largest number of victims to seek compensation and ensure simple, affordable and effective access to justice for EU citizens, thereby avoiding excessive litigation and subsequent unnecessary individual or collective actions concerning the same infringement; calls on the Member States to put in place efficient mechanisms ensuring that as many victims as possible are informed and made aware of their rights and obligations, in particular when they are domiciled in several Member States, whilst avoiding unduly harming the reputation of the party concerned, in order to respect the principle of the presumption of innocence;
sistem skupinskih tožb je treba zavrniti, kadar oškodovanci niso identificirani pred razglasitvijo sodbe, na podlagi, da je to v nasprotju s pravnim redom številnih držav članic in krši pravico žrtev, ki bi v sodnem postopku sodelovale nevede, vendar bi bila sodba sodišča za njih vseeno zavezujoča;
a collective redress system where the victims are not identified before the judgment is delivered must be rejected on the grounds that it is contrary to many Member States' legal orders and violates the rights of any victims who might participate in the procedure unknowingly and yet be bound by the court's decision;
države članice morajo zagotoviti, da ima sodnik ali podoben organ pravico, da s predhodnim preverjanjem dopustnosti potencialne kolektivne tožbe odloči, da so pogoji izpolnjeni in da je tožba primerna za nadaljevanje postopka;
Member States should ensure that a judge or similar body continues to have discretionary powers taking the form of a preliminary admissibility check of any potential collective action in order to confirm that the qualifying criteria have been met and that the action is fit to proceed;
države članice morajo imenovati organizacije, ki so usposobljene za vložitev zastopniške tožbe, pri čemer so potrebna evropska merila, ki bodo jasno določala, katere so za to usposobljene; ta merila lahko temeljijo na členu 3 Direktive št. 2009/22/ES o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov, vendar morajo biti natančneje določena, da bi se izognili zlorabam pravdnih postopkov in da bi zagotovili dostop do sodnega varstva; ta merila bi morala med drugim zadevati finančne in kadrovske vire organizacij;
Member States should designate organisations qualified to bring representative actions, and European criteria would be useful in order to clearly define these qualified entities; these criteria could be based on Article 3 of Directive 2009/22/EC on injunctions for the protection of consumer interests, but need to be further specified in order to ensure both that abusive litigation is avoided and that access to justice is granted; such criteria should cover, inter alia, the financial and human resources of qualifying organisations;
žrtve morajo biti v vsakem primeru svobodne, da alternativno uveljavljajo individualen odškodninski zahtevek pred pristojnim sodiščem;
victims must in any case be free to seek the alternative of individual compensatory redress before a competent court;
horizontalni okvir bi moral obravnavati odškodnine le za dejansko povzročeno škodo. kaznovalne odškodnine pa morajo biti prepovedane; v skladu z načelom o odškodnini mora biti dodeljena odškodnina porazdeljena med posamezne žrtve v višini škode, ki so jo utrpele; odvetniške nagrade, vezane na uspeh, v Evropi niso praksa in ne bi smele biti del obveznega horizontalnega okvira;
the horizontal framework should cover compensation only for the actual damage caused, and punitive damages must be prohibited; by virtue of the concept of compensation the damages awarded must be distributed to individual victims in proportion to the harm they sustained individually; by and large, contingency fees are unknown in Europe and should not form part of the mandatory horizontal framework;
tožniki v kolektivni tožbi ne smejo biti v boljšem položaju kot individualni tožniki glede dostopa do dokazov obtoženca, vsak tožnik pa mora predložiti dokaze za svoj zahtevek; obveznost razkritja dokumentov tožnikom (razkritje) v Evropi v glavnem ni v praksi in ne sme biti del obveznega horizontalnega okvira;
collective claimants must not be in a better position than individual claimants with regard to access to evidence from the defendant, and each claimant must provide evidence for his claim; an obligation to disclose documents to the claimants (‘discovery’) is mostly unknown in Europe and must not form part of the horizontal framework;
vsaka tožba vključuje finančno tveganje, države članice pa morajo določiti lastna pravila o razdelitvi stroškov, v skladu s katerimi mora stranka, ki izgubi, kriti stroške nasprotne stranke, da bi na ta način preprečili pretirano širjenje neutemeljenih tožbenih zahtevkov v vseevropskem mehanizmu kolektivnih pravnih sredstev;
there can be no action without financial risk, and Member States are to determine their own rules on the allocation of costs, under which the unsuccessful party must bear the costs of the other party in order to avoid the proliferation of unmeritorious claims in an EU-wide collective redress mechanism;
Komisija ne sme določiti pogojev ali smernic o financiranju odškodninskih zahtevkov, saj večina pravnih sistemov držav članic ne pozna financiranja s strani tretje stranke, ki se ji na primer ponudi delež dodeljene odškodnine; to državam članicam ne preprečuje, da bi določile pogoje ali smernice za financiranje odškodninskih zahtevkov;
the Commission must not set out any conditions or guidelines on the funding of damages claims, as recourse to third-party funding is unknown in most Member States' legal systems, for instance, by offering a share of the damages awarded; this does not preclude Member States setting out conditions or guidelines on the funding of damages claims;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči načine za ozaveščanje potrošnikov o obstoju mehanizma kolektivih tožb in omogočanje sodelovanja med organizacijami, usposobljenimi za vložitev zastopniške tožbe; poudarja ključno vlogo, ki jo lahko imajo pri posredovanju informacij čim večjemu številu žrtev kršitev prava EU potrošniške organizacije in evropska mreža centrov za varstvo potrošnikov;
Calls on the Commission to explore ways of raising consumer awareness of the availability of collective redress mechanisms and facilitating cooperation between the entities qualified to bring collective actions; stresses the key role that consumer organisations and the European Consumer Centres Network (ECC-Net) can play in passing on the information to as many victims of infringements of EU law as possible;
poudarja, da je zaradi številnih kršitev prava Unije, ki jih je Komisija ugotovila na področju ukrepov EU za zaščito potrošnikov, potrebno okrepiti sodno prepoved Študija o težavah, s katerimi se srečujejo potrošniki, ki želijo odškodnino zaradi kršitve zakonov o zaščiti potrošnikov, in o ekonomskih posledicah teh težav, 1. del, glavno poročilo, 26 avgust 2008, str.
Stresses that many of the infringements of Union law identified by the Commission in the field of EU consumer protection measures call for the strengthening of injunctive relief Study regarding the problems faced by consumers in obtaining redress for infringements of consumer protection legislation, and the economic consequences of such problems, 26 August 2008, Part I: Main Report, p.
21 idr.
21 et seq.
, ob priznavanju, da sodna prepoved ni zadostna, če so žrtve utrpele škodo in so upravičene do odškodnine; poziva Komisijo, naj identificira zakonodajo EU, na področju katere je težko dobiti odškodninske zahtevke;
, while acknowledging that injunctive relief is not sufficient when victims have suffered damage and have the right to compensation; asks the Commission to identify the EU legislation in respect of which it is difficult to obtain compensatory redress;
meni, da je treba to storiti, da bi lahko opredelili področja, kjer bi lahko horizontalni okvir zagotavljal skupne odškodninske zahtevke v primeru kršitev te zakonodaje ali kršitev konkurenčnega prava EU; poziva, da se zadevno zakonodajo EU uvrsti na seznam v prilogi k temu horizontalnemu instrumentu;
Considers that this should be done in order to pinpoint the areas where the horizontal framework could provide for collective compensatory redress for breach of such legislation, as well as for breach of EU antitrust law; calls for the relevant EU legislation to be listed in an annex to the horizontal instrument;
Alternativno reševanje sporov (ARS)
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
; vendar poudarja, da bi morali ti mehanizmi ostati alternativa sodnemu varstvu (kot pove samo ime) in ne predpogoj zanj;
should be the starting point for the establishment of this power; stresses, however, that these mechanisms should remain, as the name indicates, merely an alternative to judicial redress, not a precondition therefor;
poudarja, da bi moral horizontalni okvir sam določati predpise za preprečevanje prakse izbiranja najugodnejšega sodišča, pri čemer pa ne bi smel ogrožati dostopa do sodnega varstva, ter da bi morala biti uredba Bruselj I izhodišče pri določanju pristojnih sodišč;
Stresses that a horizontal framework should itself lay down rules to prevent a rush to the courts (‘forum shopping’) whilst not jeopardising access to justice, and that Brussels I should be taken as a starting point for determining which courts have jurisdiction;
poziva k nadaljnji preučitvi tega, kako je mogoče izpopolniti kolizijska pravila; meni, da bi bila ena izmed rešitev uporaba prava države, kjer ima večina oškodovancev prebivališče oziroma sedež, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da morajo imeti individualni oškodovanci svobodo pri odločitvi, da se skupinske tožbe po načelu privolitve v sodelovanje ne udeležijo, temveč da vložijo individualni odškodninski zahtevek v skladu s splošnimi pravili mednarodnega zasebnega prava, zapisanimi v uredbah Bruselj I, Rim I in Rim II;
Calls for further examination of how the conflict-of-law rules might be amended; believes that one solution could be to apply the law of the place where the majority of the victims are domiciled, bearing in mind that individual victims should remain free not to pursue the opt-in collective action but instead to seek redress individually in accordance with the general rules of private international law laid down in the Brussels I, Rome I and Rome II regulations;
vztraja, da mora biti Evropski parlament v okviru rednega zakonodajnega postopka udeležen pri vseh zakonodajnih pobudah s področja kolektivnih tožb in da morajo vsi predlogi temeljiti na natančni oceni učinka;
Insists that the European Parliament must be involved, within the framework of the ordinary legislative procedure, in any legislative initiative in the field of collective redress and that any proposal must be based on a detailed impact assessment;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic in socialnim partnerjem na ravni Unije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, and the social partners at EU level.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih UL L 404, 30.12.2006, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju osnutka uredbe Komisije o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 glede seznama prehranskih trditev,
having regard to the draft Commission regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 with regard to the list of nutrition claims,
ob upoštevanju mnenja, ki ga je dne 13. oktobra 2011 predložil odbor iz člena 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006,
having regard to the opinion delivered on 13 October 2011 by the committee referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1169/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom UL L 304, 22.11.2011, str.
having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 88(2) in (4)(b) Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 88(2) and (4)(b) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 uporaba prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditev ne sme biti napačna, dvoumna ali zavajajoča;
whereas, as stated in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the use of nutrition and health claims must not be false, ambiguous or misleading;
ker je lahko v skladu s členom 5(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 uporaba prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditev dovoljena le, če se lahko pričakuje, da bo povprečen potrošnik razumel v trditvi navedene pozitivne učinke;
whereas, as stated in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the use of nutrition and health claims can only be permitted if the average consumer can be expected to understand the beneficial effects as expressed in the claim;
ker morajo v skladu s členom 9(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 primerjalne prehranske trditve primerjati sestavo zadevnega živila z vrsto drugih živil, ki spadajo v isto kategorijo, tudi živil drugih znamk;
whereas, as stated in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, comparative nutrition claims must compare the composition of the food in question with a range of foods of the same category, including foods of other brands;
ker v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (EU) št. 1169/2011 podatki o hrani potrošnika ne smejo zavajati glede narave, lastnosti in značilnosti posameznega živila;
whereas, as stated in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, food information must not mislead the consumer as to the nature, properties and characteristics of a foodstuff;