natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sprememba 111
Amendment 111
Države članice vsaj vsakih deset let poskrbijo za redna samoocenjevanja svojega nacionalnega okvira, pristojnih regulatornih organov, nacionalnega programa in njegovega izvajanja ter omogočijo mednarodni strokovni pregled svojega nacionalnega okvira, organa in/ali programa, da bi se zagotovila izpolnitev visokih standardov ravnanja z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki.
Member States shall periodically, and at least every 10 years, arrange for self-assessments of their national framework, competent regulatory authority, national programme and its implementation, and invite international peer review of their national framework, authority and/or programme with the aim of ensuring that high standards are achieved in the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.
Rezultati vsakega strokovnega pregleda se sporočijo Komisiji in
The outcomes of any peer review shall be reported to the Commission and the
Rezultati vsakega strokovnega pregleda se sporočijo Komisiji
The outcomes of any peer review shall be reported to the Commission
, ki Evropskemu parlamentu
, which shall submit a periodical report to the European Parliament
Svetu predloži periodično poročilo, v katerem zgoščeno predstavi sklepe, oblikovane med strokovnimi pregledi
Council addressing in an aggregated form the conclusions reached in the course of the peer reviews
Sprememba 138
Amendment 138
Člen 16a
Article 16b
Komisija najkasneje dve leti po tem, ko države članice izvedejo strokovno oceno iz člena 16(3), posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o ponovno ocenjeni zasnovi ravnanja z radioaktivnimi odpadki in izrabljenim gorivom ter o izvoznih določilih iz člena 4(3).
The Commission shall, no later than two years after peer reviews by Member States have taken place as provided for in Article 16(3), submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council which focuses on a reassessment of the concept of the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and the export provisions laid down in Article 4(3).
V tej ponovni oceni se upoštevajo zlasti vprašanja povratnosti in dostopnosti odpadkov po tem, ko so nameščeni v odlagališče, upoštevaje razvoj na področju raziskav ter nadaljnje znanstveno znanje na tem področju.
That reassessment shall in particular consider the issues of reversibility and retrievability of waste once it is placed in a disposal site in the light of research developments and further scientific knowledge in this field.
Poročilu po potrebi sledi revizija te direktive, da bi upoštevali najnovejše tehnološke raziskave na področju radioaktivnih odpadkov in izrabljenega goriva.
The report shall, if necessary, be followed by a revision of this Directive to reflect the latest technological research regarding spent fuel and radioactive waste management.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s to direktivo, do … O tem takoj obvestijo Komisijo.
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by
sklicujejo ob uradni objavi.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.
* UL: Prosimo, vstavite datum dve leti po dnevu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
OJ: Please insert date two years after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. junija 2011 o pooblastilu za trialog o predlogu proračuna za leto 2012 ( 2011/2019(BUD) )
European Parliament resolution of 23 June 2011 on the mandate for the trilogue on the 2012 Draft Budget ( 2011/2019(BUD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga proračuna za proračunsko leto 2012, ki ga je Komisija sprejela 20. aprila 2011 ( SEK(2011)0498 ),
having regard to the draft budget for the financial year 2012, which the Commission adopted on 20 April 2011 ( SEC(2011)0498 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2011 o splošnih smernicah za pripravo proračuna za leto 2012 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0114 .
having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2011 on the general guidelines for the preparation of the 2012 budget Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0114 .
ob upoštevanju naslova II poglavja 7 Poslovnika,
having regard to Title II, Chapter 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za ribištvo,
having regard to the letter of the Committee on Fisheries,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za proračunski nadzor, Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za regionalni razvoj, Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, Odbora za ustavne zadeve in Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A7-0230/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Development, the Committee on Budgetary Control, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A7-0230/2011 ),
ker je proračunski postopek za leto 2012 drugi postopek, ki bo potekal v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo, in bo tako mogoče upoštevati pomembne izkušnje iz preteklega leta,
whereas the 2012 budgetary procedure is the second procedure carried out on the basis of the Treaty of Lisbon, and important lessons can be drawn from last year's experience,
ker bi moral trialog, ki bo potekal julija, predstavnikom obeh vej proračunskega organa omogočiti, da razpravljajo o prednostnih nalogah, ki so jih opredelili za proračun za leto 2012, in da po možnosti dosežejo dogovor, ki se bo lahko upošteval pri obravnavi proračuna,
whereas the trilogue which will be held in July should enable the representatives of the two arms of the budgetary authority to discuss the priorities they have identified with regard to the annual budget 2012 and possibly find common ground that could be taken into account in their respective readings,
ker sta se poljsko in madžarsko predsedstvo javno zavezala odprtemu, konstruktivnemu političnemu dialogu o proračunskih zadevah z Evropskim parlamentom,
whereas the Polish and Hungarian presidencies have made public commitments to entering into an open, constructive and political dialogue with the EP on budgetary matters,
ker se zato pričakuje, da bo Svet ravnal kot zaupanja vreden politični partner skozi celoten postopek ter se bo odrekel samovoljnemu ali povsem aritmetičnemu zmanjševanju sredstev v vseh proračunskih vrsticah,
whereas the Council as a whole is therefore expected to act as a trustworthy political partner throughout the procedure, avoiding making arbitrary or purely arithmetical cuts across the budget lines,
opominja, da je Evropski parlament v resoluciji z dne 24. marca 2011 strategijo Evropa 2020 za pametno, vključujočo in trajnostno rast postavil v središče proračunske strategije EU za leto 2012, da bi pomagal Evropi, da okreva po gospodarski in socialni krizi in da bo ob izhodu iz nje močnejša;
Recalls that in its resolution of 24 March 2011 the EP put the Europe 2020 strategy for a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth at the centre of the 2012 EU budgetary strategy in order to help Europe recover from the economic and social crisis and come out stronger;
ponavlja, da je spodbujanje pametnega, trajnostnega in vključujočega gospodarstva, ki z uresničevanjem sedmih vodilnih pobud strategije Evropa 2020 ustvarja delovna mesta in kakovostne zaposlitve cilj, ki ga je soglasno potrdilo vseh 27 držav članic in institucij EU; opozarja, da bo uresničevanje te strategije zahtevalo ogromne v prihodnost usmerjene naložbe do leta 2020, katerih vrednost je Komisija v sporočilu o pregledu proračuna ocenila na nič manj kot 1 800 milijard EUR ( KOM(2010)0700 ); zato poudarja, da ne kaže odlašati z nujnimi naložbami v izobraževanje na ravni EU in na ravni držav članic, da bi izboljšali raven izobrazbe, spodbujali socialno vključenost, predvsem z zmanjševanjem revščine, ter razvili na znanju temelječo družbo, ki bi slonela na znanstveni in tehnološki zmogljivosti celotne EU; v zvezi s tem vztraja pri tem, da je treba podpirati raziskave, razvoj, inovacije, mala in srednja podjetja ter razvoj novih tehnologij z učinkovito porabo virov;
Recalls that the promotion of a smart, sustainable and inclusive economy, which creates jobs and high-quality employment by delivering on the Europe 2020 strategy's seven flagship initiatives is a jointly endorsed goal of the 27 Member States and the EU institutions; recalls that the implementation of this strategy will require a huge amount of future-oriented investment up to 2020, estimated at no less than EUR 1 800 billion by the Commission in its communication entitled ‘The EU Budget Review’ ( COM(2010)0700 ); underlines, therefore, that necessary investments - at both EU and Member State level - must be made now and delayed no longer, to improve education levels, foster social inclusion, in particular through the reduction of poverty, and the development of a knowledge-based society rooted in the overall EU scientific and technological capacity; in this context, insists on the need to support research, development, innovation and SMEs and the development of resource-efficient technologies;
glede na te okoliščine je globoko zaskrbljen, da so zaradi krize upadle javne naložbe v državah članicah na nekaterih od teh področij, saj so morale države članice prilagoditi svoje nacionalne proračune; zahteva, da se ta trend ustavi, in je trdno prepričan, da je treba zagotoviti naložbe na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni, če želimo, da EU kot celota izpolni cilje strategije EU 2020; meni, da bi moral proračun EU odigrati vlogo finančnega vzvoda za politike okrevanja po krizi v državah članicah, tako da bi spodbujal in prispeval k nacionalnim naložbam za krepitev rasti in zaposlovanja; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je uskladitev proračuna EU s cilji strategije EU 2020 izjemnega pomena; zato opozarja, da bi morala biti področja usposabljanja mladih, mobilnosti in zaposlovanja, malih in srednjih podjetij ter raziskav in razvoja osrednja prednostna naloga proračuna EU; poudarja, da je to povsem v skladu z dinamiko evropskega semestra, novega mehanizma za boljše evropsko gospodarsko vodenje, katerega cilj je povečati skladnost, sinergije in dopolnjevanje med proračunom EU in nacionalnimi proračuni pri uresničevanju dogovorjenih ciljev strategije Evropa 2020;
Is deeply concerned, against this background, that the current crisis has resulted in a drop in public investment in some of these areas because of the adjustments that Member States have made to their national budgets; calls for this trend to be reversed and firmly believes that investments need to be guaranteed at EU and national level if the EU as a whole is to deliver on the EU 2020 strategy; is of the opinion that the EU budget has a role to play as a leverage tool for Member States' recovery policies by triggering and supporting national investment to reinforce growth and employment; underlines in that respect that aligning the EU budget with the goals of the EU 2020 strategy is of utmost importance; reminds in this regard that support for youth training, mobility and employment, SMEs, research and development should be a key priority of the EU budget; emphasises that this is fully in line with the dynamics of the European Semester, which, as a new mechanism for enhanced European economic governance, aims at increasing consistency, synergies and complementarities between the EU and the national budgets in delivering on the jointly agreed Europe 2020 goals;
opozarja, da strategija EU 2020 in evropski semester potrebujeta močno parlamentarno razsežnost, in je trdno prepričan, da bi večje sodelovanje Parlamenta znatno izboljšalo demokratični značaj in preglednost takšne naloge;
Recalls that EU 2020 strategy and the European Semester need a strong parliamentary dimension, and shows its firm conviction that stronger parliamentary involvement would significantly improve the democratic nature and transparency of such an exercise;
ugotavlja, da je v predlogu proračuna EU za leto 2012, kot ga je predložila Komisija, 147 435 milijonov EUR sredstev za prevzem obveznosti (146 676 milijonov EUR brez Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji in rezerve za nujno pomoč) ter 132 738 milijonov EUR sredstev za plačila; ugotavlja tudi, da ta zneska predstavljata 1,12 % oziroma 1,01 % napovedanega bruto nacionalnega dohodka EU (BND) za leto 2012, in poudarja, da ta delež v letih 2011 in 2012 ostaja precej stabilen ob predvideni rasti BND v letu 2012, ki jo je Komisija ocenila na kar +4,7% (v trenutnih cenah);
Observes that the EU draft budget (DB) for 2012, as proposed by the Commission, amounts to EUR 147 435 million in commitment appropriations (CA) (EUR 146 676 million without the European Globalisation Fund (EGF) and the Emergency Aid Reserve (EAR) and EUR 132 738 million in payment appropriations (PA); notes that these amounts represent respectively 1,12 % and 1,01% of the EU's forecast gross national income (GNI) for 2012 and emphasises that this proportion remains noticeably stable between 2011 and 2012, with GNI growth estimated by the Commission at no less than +4,7% in 2012 (in current prices);
priznava, da če naj bi proračun EU prispeval k skupnim prizadevanjem držav članic v obdobju varčevanja, mora biti ta prispevek sorazmeren z njegovo velikostjo, posebnimi značilnostmi in dejanskim gospodarskim učinkom; verjame, da je treba upoštevati tekoča prizadevanja za konsolidacijo nacionalnih proračunov, ki se odvijajo v številnih državah članicah zaradi fiskalne nediscipline v preteklosti, vendar opozarja, da proračun EU po določbah Pogodbe ne sme imeti primanjkljaja in da proračun EU predstavlja le 2 % vseh javnih odhodkov v EU;
Acknowledges that if the EU budget is to contribute to the collective effort of Member States in times of austerity this effort should be commensurate with its size, specific features and real economic impact; believes that account should be taken of ongoing national budgetary consolidation efforts which are taking place in many Member States owing to past fiscal indiscipline but recalls that under Treaty provisions the EU budget cannot run a deficit and that it represents only 2% of total public spending in the EU;
ugotavlja, da naj bi letna stopnja inflacije v EU 27 za leto 2011 po ocenah znašala 2,7 %, kar pomeni, da je predlagano nominalno povečanje sredstev za prevzem obveznosti za 3,7 % in sredstev za plačila za 4,9 % v proračunu za leto 2012 v primerjavi s proračunom za leto 2011 v bistvu realno povečanje za 1 % oziroma 2,2 %; poudarja dejstvo, da več držav članic načrtuje precej večje povečanje državnega proračuna, kot je povečanje, ki ga je predlagala Evropska komisija za proračun EU; je seznanjen tudi s prizadevanji nekaterih držav članic za zmanjšanje proračunskega primanjkljaja in upočasnitev rasti državnega dolga, da bi omogočili prehod na trajnejšo raven;
Observes that the EU 27 annual inflation rate for 2011 is estimated at 2,7%, meaning that the proposed nominal 2012 increases of 3,7% in CA and 4,9% in PA are, compared to the Budget 2011, in real terms 1% and 2,2%; underlines the fact that several Member States are planning increases in their national budgets greater than the one proposed by the European Commission for the EU budget; notes also some Member States' efforts to reduce budget deficits and slow the growth of sovereign debt, bringing it to a more sustainable level;
poudarja dejstvo, da so predlagani zneski za letni proračun EU za leto 2012 v skladu s profilom odhodkov EU, določenim v večletnem finančnem okviru 2007-2013, če se doseže sporazum proračunskega organa za revizijo večletnega finančnega okvira, ki bo upošteval dodatne finančne potrebe za program ITER; poudarja, da je treba zato vsako morebitno povečanje (ali zmanjšanje) v primerjavi s proračunom za leto 2011 oceniti ob upoštevanju učinka na izvajanje večletnih programov; poudarja, da je to vprašanje verodostojnosti institucij in nepretrganosti projekta EU, medtem ko se odgovornosti in zaveze EU še naprej povečujejo; glede na to meni, da je kot prednostno nalogo treba ciljnim političnim področjem dati pomemben in prepoznaven mehanizem financiranja za politike in nove pristojnosti na ravni EU;
Highlights the fact that the proposed figures in the 2012 EU annual budget are consistent with the profile of EU expenditure set in the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2007-2013, provided that an agreement of the budgetary authority can be found for a revision of the MFF, accommodating the additional financing needs of ITER; emphasises that any increase (or decrease) compared to Budget 2011 must therefore be assessed bearing in mind its impact on the delivery of the multiannual programmes; stresses that this is a question of institutional credibility and coherence of the EU project when EU responsibilities and commitments keep on growing; believes, from this point of view that endowing targeted policy areas and new competencies established at EU level with meaningful and visible financial capacity is a priority;
opominja, da se je prvi krog razprave o proračunskih prednostnih nalogah v Parlamentu že začel, in sicer se je glavni poročevalec za proračun za leto 2012 obširno posvetoval s specializiranimi parlamentarnimi odbori; poudarja, da je treba zdaj ta proces v odborih izpopolniti glede na njihova področja pristojnosti, da se opredelijo pozitivne in negativne prednostne naloge za proračun 2012;
Recalls that a first round of discussions on budgetary priorities has already started in Parliament in the form of the extensive consultation of its specialised committees by its general rapporteur for the Budget 2012; emphasises that the process must now be fine-tuned in each committee for its respective field of competence so as to identify the positive and negative priorities for the Budget 2012;
meni, da je treba tudi sredstva v proračunu EU za leto 2012, ki niso namenjena strategiji Evropa 2020, določiti na ustrezni ravni, da se zagotovi nadaljevanje politik EU in doseganje ciljev EU; še zlasti poudarja, da je treba EU omogočiti, da prevzame odgovornost na svetovnem prizorišču, zlasti glede na arabsko pomlad in nemire na Bližnjem vzhodu;
Takes the view that, besides the delivery of the EU 2020 strategy, appropriations in the EU 2012 Budget should be set at an appropriate level to ensure the continuation of EU policies and the achievement of EU objectives; underlines in particular the need to allow the EU to shoulder its global responsibility, especially in the wake of the Arab Spring and the unrest in the Middle East;
ugotavlja, da so težavne gospodarske razmere po vsej EU Komisijo že spodbudile k temu, da je opredelila negativne prednostne naloge in prihranke na nekaterih področjih politik v primerjavi s prvotnimi predvidevanji v finančnem načrtu, zlasti tam, kjer so bile v nedavni preteklosti značilne nezadostna uspešnost in nizke stopnje izvrševanja, kakor je zahteval EP v svoji resoluciji 24. marca 2011; Komisijo pa poziva, naj posreduje dodatne informacije, s katerimi bi podkrepila svojo oceno, da bo lahko EP jasno opredelil politične in proračunske pozitivne in negativne prednostne naloge, pa tudi možnost dodatnih prihrankov in prerazporeditev, pri čemer pa je pomembno, da se izvajanje programov in ukrepov EU, tudi finančnih ukrepov za spopad z učinki krize in spodbujanje rasti, na ravni EU nadaljuje;
Observes that the difficult economic situation across the EU has led the Commission to make a first endeavour to identify negative priorities and savings in some policy areas as compared with what was initially foreseen in the financial programming, particularly in those characterised by poor performance and low implementation rates in the recent past as requested by the EP in its Resolution of 24 March 2011; asks however the Commission to provide additional information supporting its assessment to enable EP to clearly determine political and budgetary positive and negative priorities as well as the possibility of further savings and reallocations, whereas it is essential that the implementation of EU programmes and actions, including the financing of actions aiming at tackling the effects of the crisis and promoting growth, continue at EU level;
opozarja pred kakršnim koli poskusom Sveta, da bi se v proračunu izvedla horizontalna zmanjšanja, ki bi vnaprej odločala o skupni ravni sredstev, brez ustreznega upoštevanja natančne ocene dejanskih potreb za doseganje sprejetih ciljev in političnih obvez Unije; če bi do zmanjšanj prišlo, zahteva, da Svet javno pojasni in jasno opredeli, pri kateri od političnih prednostnih nalog ali projektov EU bo prišlo do zamude ali dokončne opustitve;
Strongly warns against any attempt by the Council, to make horizontal cuts in the budget, deciding on the overall level of appropriations a priori, without duly taking into account an accurate assessment of the actual needs for the achievement of the Union's agreed objectives and political commitments; requests, if cuts are made, for the Council to instead publicly explain and clearly identify which of the EU's political priorities or projects could be delayed or dropped altogether;
je seznanjen s predlaganim povečanjem sredstev za plačila za 4,9 % v primerjavi z letom 2011; je prepričan, da je Komisija te zneske predlagala na osnovi preudarne in kritične analize napovedi držav članic, ki soupravljajo 80 % proračuna EU; ugotavlja, da to povečanje večinoma izhaja iz pravnih potreb, nastalih v povezavi s sedmim raziskovalnim programom ter strukturnimi in kohezijskim skladom; je prepričan, da je predlagana raven plačil resnično najmanjši znesek, ki še omogoča izpolnjevanje pravnih obveznosti EU, prevzetih v prejšnjih letih, in da je EU te pravne obveznosti dolžna spoštovati in zagotoviti, da programi razvijejo svoj celotni potencial in delujejo s polno paro; zato odločno poziva Svet, naj se odreče zmanjšanju predlaganega zneska za plačila; izraža namen ohranitve zneska plačil na ravni, ki jo je Komisija predlagala v predlogu proračuna, zlasti glede na to, da Svet že v začetku leta 2011 ni bil več pripravljen spoštovati uradne zaveze iz decembra 2010, da bo, če bo treba, zagotovil nova proračunska sredstva;
Notes the proposed increase in PA of 4,9% compared to 2011; is convinced that the Commission is proposing such figures on the basis of a careful and critical analysis of forecasts provided by Member States, which themselves co-manage 80% of the EU budget; notes that the bulk of this increase is linked to legal needs arising in relation to the 7th Research Programme and the Structural and Cohesion Funds; is convinced that the proposed level of payments represents the bare minimum required to honour EU legal commitments made in previous years and that it is the EU's duty to comply with the legal obligations deriving from these commitments and ensure that programmes unfold their full potential and run at full speed; strongly urges the Council, therefore, to refrain from cutting the proposed level of payments; expresses its intention to keep the level of payments at the level proposed by the Commission in the Draft Budget, particularly in view of Council's early 2011 reluctance to honour its formal commitment of December 2010 to providing fresh appropriations in case of need;