natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To ne pomeni, da organi, pristojni za vpis, ne morejo zahtevati, naj oseba, ki zaprosi za vpis, zagotovi dodatne informacije ali predloži dodatne listine, ki se zahtevajo po pravu države članice, v kateri se vodi register, na primer informacije ali lisitne v zvezi s plačilom davka.
This should not preclude the authorities involved in the registration from asking the person applying for registration to provide such additional information, or to present such additional documents as are required under the law of the Member State in which the register is kept, for instance information or documents relating to the payment of revenue.
Iz področja uporabe te uredbe bi morali biti izključeni tudi učinki vpisa pravice v register.
The effects of the recording of a right in a register should also be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
v državah članicah.
in the Member States.
Zato bi moral imeti izraz „sodišče“ v tej uredbi širok pomen, tako da se ne bi nanašal le na sodišča v pravem pomenu besede, ki izvajajo sodno funkcijo, temveč tudi na notarje ali matične urade v nekaterih državah članicah, ki v nekaterih dednih zadevah tako kot sodišča izvajajo sodno funkcijo, ter na notarje in poklicne pravnike v nekaterih državah članicah, ki v določenih dednih zadevah izvajajo sodno funkcijo na podlagi prenosa pooblastil s strani sodišča
For the purposes of this Regulation the term ‘court’ should therefore be given a broad meaning so as to cover not only courts in the true sense of the word, exercising judicial functions, but also the notaries or registry offices in some Member States who or which, in certain matters of succession, exercise judicial functions like courts, and the notaries and legal professionals who, in some Member States, exercise judicial functions in a given succession by delegation of power by a court.
Nasprotno pa izraz „sodišče“ ne bi smel vključevati zunajsodnih organov držav članic, ki so po nacionalnem pravu pooblaščeni za obravnavanje dednih zadev, kot so notarji v večini držav članic, v katerih navadno ne izvajajo sodne funkcije.
Conversely, the term ‘court’ should not cover non-judicial authorities of a Member State empowered under national law to deal with matters of succession, such as the notaries in most Member States where, as is the usual case, they are not exercising judicial functions.
Ta uredba bi morala vsem notarjem, ki so pristojni za obravnavanje dednih zadev v državah članicah, omogočiti izvajanje te pristojnosti.
This Regulation should allow all notaries who have competence in matters of succession in the Member States to exercise such competence.
Ali za notarje v določeni državi veljajo pravila o pristojnosti iz te uredbe, bi moralo biti odvisno od tega, ali spadajo v opredelitev sodišča iz te uredbe.
Whether or not the notaries in a given Member State are bound by the rules of jurisdiction set out in this Regulation should depend on whether or not they are covered by the term ‘court’ for the purposes of this Regulation.
Listine, ki jih notarji izdajo v dednih zadevah v državah članicah, bi morale biti v obtoku v skladu s to uredbo.
Acts issued by notaries in matters of succession in the Member States should circulate under this Regulation.
Ob upoštevanju vse večje mobilnosti evropskih državljanov
In view of the increasing mobility of citizens and in order to
v Evropski uniji in
ensure the proper
v kateri se izvaja pristojnost, obstaja resnična navezna okoliščina
in which jurisdiction is exercised
, v tej uredbi določiti,
, this Regulation should provide
V nekaterih primerih se lahko izkaže, da je določitev običajnega prebivališča zapustnika zapletena.
In certain cases, determining the deceased's habitual residence may prove complex.
Do takšnega primera bi lahko zlasti prišlo, če je zapustnik iz poklicnih ali ekonomskih razlogov odšel delat v tujino, lahko tudi za dalj časa, vendar je ohranil tesno in trdno povezavo z državo izvora.
Such a case may arise, in particular, where the deceased for professional or economic reasons had gone to live abroad to work there, sometimes for a long time, but had maintained a close and stable connection with his State of origin.
Za določitev prava, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, lahko organ, ki obravnava dedovanje, v izjemnih primerih, če se je zapustnik na primer razmeroma nedavno pred smrtjo preselil v državo, v kateri je imel običajno prebivališče, in je iz vseh okoliščin zadeve jasno, da je bil očitno tesneje povezan z neko drugo državo, zaključi, da bi moralo biti pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, pravo države, s katero je bil zapustnik očitno tesneje povezan, ne pa pravo države, v kateri je imel običajno prebivališče.
With regard to the determination of the law applicable to the succession the authority dealing with the succession may in exceptional cases – where, for instance, the deceased had moved to the State of his habitual residence fairly recently before his death and all the circumstances of the case indicate that he was manifestly more closely connected with another State – arrive at the conclusion that the law applicable to the succession should not be the law of the State of the habitual residence of the deceased but rather the law of the State with which the deceased was manifestly more closely connected.
Vendar se očitno najtesnejša povezava ne bi smela uporabljati kot pomožna navezna okoliščina vsakič, ko bi se določanje običajnega prebivališča zapustnika ob njegovi smrti izkazalo za težavno.
That manifestly closest connection should, however, not be resorted to as a subsidiary connecting factor whenever the determination of the habitual residence of the deceased at the time of death proves complex.
Pravila te uredbe so zasnovana tako, da bo organ, ki obravnava dedno zadevo, v večini primerov uporabil svoje pravo.
The rules of this Regulation are devised so as to ensure that the authority dealing with the succession will, in most situations, be applying its own law.
Eden od teh mehanizmov bi moral strankam v dedni zadevi omogočiti, da sklenejo dogovor o izbiri sodišča v korist sodišč države članice, katere pravo je bilo izbrano.
One such mechanism should be to allow the parties concerned by the succession to conclude a choice-of-court agreement in favour of the courts of the Member State of the chosen law.
Za vsak primer posebej bi bilo treba glede na vprašanje, na katero se nanaša dogovor o izbiri sodišča, določiti, ali morajo dogovor skleniti vse stranke v dedni zadevi ali pa se lahko nekatere od njih dogovorijo, da pred izbranim sodiščem začnejo postopek glede točno določenega vprašanja, če odločitev sodišča o tem vprašanju ne bi vplivala na druge stranke.
It would have to be determined on a case-by-case basis, depending in particular on the issue covered by the choice-of-court agreement, whether the agreement would have to be concluded between all parties concerned by the succession or whether some of them could agree to bring a specific issue before the chosen court in a situation where the decision by that court on that issue would not affect the rights of the other parties to the succession.
Sodišče, ki je začelo postopek v dedni zadevi po uradni dolžnosti, kot to poteka v nekaterih državah članicah, bi moralo končati postopek, če se stranke dogovorijo, da bodo dedovanje sporazumno uredile z izvensodno poravnavo v državi članici, katere pravo je bilo izbrano.
A court seised of the succession of its own motion, as is the case in certain Member States, should close the proceedings if the parties agree to settle the succession amicably out of court in the Member State of the chosen law.
To bi moralo veljati, tudi če pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ni pravo te države članice.
This should be the case even if the law applicable to the succession is not the law of that Member State.
v tej uredbi
this Regulation
taksativno in po pomembnosti našteti razloge, na podlagi katerih je mogoče izvajati takšno
should list exhaustively, in a hierarchical order,
Da bi odpravili zlasti primere odrekanja sodnega varstva, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti tudi forum necessitatis, tako da bi lahko sodišče neke države članice izjemoma odločalo o dedovanju, ki je tesno povezano s tretjo državo.
In order to remedy, in particular, situations of denial of justice this Regulation should provide a forum necessitatis allowing a court of a Member State, on an exceptional basis, to rule on a succession which is closely connected with a third State.
Za olajšanje življenja dedičev in volilojemnikov,
In order to simplify the lives of heirs and legatees
ki nimajo običajnega prebivališča
habitually resident
v državi članici,
in a Member State other than that in which the
v kateri poteka ali bo potekal zapuščinski postopek
succession is being or will be dealt with
, dajo izjave o sprejemu dediščine,
allow any person entitled under the law applicable to the succession
, volilu ali nujnemu deležu ali omejitvi svoje odgovornosti za zapustnikove dolgove, omogočiti, da dajo takšne izjave
the succession, a legacy or a reserved share, or concerning the limitation of his liability for the debts of the estate, to make such declarations in the form
Osebe, ki se bodo odločile za možnost, da dajo izjavo v državi članici, v kateri imajo običajno prebivališče, bi morale sodišče ali organ, ki vodi ali bo vodil zapuščinski postopek, same obvestiti o obstoju takšnih izjav v roku, ki ga določa pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
Persons choosing to avail themselves of the possibility to make declarations in the Member State of their habitual residence should themselves inform the court or authority which is or will be dealing with the succession of the existence of such declarations within any time-limit set by the law applicable to the succession.
Če želi oseba omejiti svojo odgovornost za zapustnikove dolgove, za to ne bi smela zadostovati izjava v ta namen pri sodiščih ali drugih pristojnih organih države članice, v kateri ima običajno prebivališče, če pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, od njega zahteva, da na pristojnem sodišču začne poseben sodni postopek, npr. postopek za popis dediščine.
It should not be possible for a person who wishes to limit his liability for the debts under the succession to do so by a mere declaration to that effect before the courts or other competent authorities of the Member State of his habitual residence where the law applicable to the succession requires him to initiate specific legal proceedings, for instance inventory proceedings, before the competent court.
Zaradi pravilnega delovanja pravosodja se v različnih
In the interest of the
državah članicah
harmonious functioning of justice
ne bi smele izdajati
, irreconcilable decisions should not be given in different
nezdružljive sodne odločbe.
Member States.
Eno od takšnih postopkovnih pravil je pravilo o litispendenci, ki se bo uporabilo, če bo ista dedna zadeva predložena različnim sodiščem v različnih državah članicah.
One such procedural rule is a lis pendens rule which will come into play if the same succession case is brought before different courts in different Member States.
Ker lahko v nekaterih državah dedne zadeve obravnavajo izvensodni organi, kot so notarji, za katere ne veljajo pravila o pristojnosti iz te uredbe, ni mogoče izključiti možnosti, da se v zvezi z isto dedno zadevo v različnih državah članicah vzporedno začneta sporazumna izvensodna poravnava in sodni postopek ali dve sporazumni izvensodni poravnavi.
Given that succession matters in some Member States may be dealt with by non-judicial authorities, such as notaries, who are not bound by the rules of jurisdiction under this Regulation, the possibility cannot be excluded that an amicable out-of-court settlement and court proceedings relating to the same succession, or two amicable out-of-court settlements relating to the same succession, may be initiated in parallel in different Member States.
bi moralo
For reasons of
to pravo
law should
, da vnaprej pripravijo dedovanje
citizens to organise their succession in advance by
ki se bo uporabljalo
the law
za dedovanje po njih
applicable to their succession
legitimna pričakovanja
the legitimate expectations of
oseb, ki so upravičene do nujnega deleža
persons entitled to a reserved share
Izbira prava v skladu s to uredbo bi torej morala biti veljavna tudi, če izbrano pravo ne določa izbire prava v dednih zadevah.
A choice of law under this Regulation should be valid even if the chosen law does not provide for a choice of law in matters of succession.
Za namene uporabe te uredbe bi bilo treba predhodno rešiti vprašanje ugotavljanja državljanstva ali več državljanstev zadevne osebe.
For the purposes of the application of this Regulation, the determination of the nationality or the multiple nationality of a person should be resolved as a preliminary question.
Pravo, določeno kot pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, bi moralo urejati dedovanje od začetka postopka do prenosa lastništva premoženja, ki sestavlja zapuščino, na upravičence, kot jih določa zakon.
The law determined as the law applicable to the succession should govern the succession from the opening of the succession to the transfer of ownership of the assets forming part of the estate to the beneficiaries as determined by that law.
Urejati bi moralo tudi vprašanja v zvezi z upravljanjem zapuščine in odgovornostjo za dolgove zapuščine, ki se deduje.
It should include questions relating to the administration of the estate and to liability for the debts of the estate under the succession.
Pravila o pristojnosti, določena v tej uredbi lahko v nekaterih primerih pripeljejo do okoliščin, ko sodišče, pristojno za odločanje o zapuščini, ne bo uporabljajo svojega prava.
The rules of jurisdiction laid down by this Regulation may, in certain cases, lead to a situation where the court having jurisdiction to rule on the succession will not be applying its own law.
To ne bi smelo posegati v morebitno odločitev strank, da se o dedovanju dogovorijo sporazumno zunaj sodišča v drugi državi članici, če je to po pravu tiste države članice možno.
This should be without prejudice to any choice made by the parties to settle the succession amicably out of court in another Member State where this is possible under the law of that Member State.
Da bi se zagotovilo nemoteno usklajevanje med pravom, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, in pravom države članice sodišča, ki imenuje upravitelje, bi sodišče moralo imenovati osebe, ki bi lahko upravljale zapuščino po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, kot so denimo izvršitelj zapustnikove oporoke ali dediči sami ali, če pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje to zahteva, tretja oseba.
In order to ensure a smooth coordination between the law applicable to the succession and the law of the Member State of the appointing court, the court should appoint the person(s) who would be entitled to administer the estate under the law applicable to the succession, such as for instance the executor of the will of the deceased or the heirs themselves or, if the law applicable to the succession so requires, a third-party administrator.
Pooblastila upraviteljev, ki so bili imenovani v državi članici sodišča, kjer poteka postopek, bi morala biti pooblastila za upravljanje, ki jih lahko izvajajo v skladu pravom, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
The powers exercised by the administrators appointed in the Member State of the court seised should be the powers of administration which they may exercise under the law applicable to the succession.
Če pooblastila za upravljanje, ki se izvajajo v skladu z dednim pravom, ne zadostujejo za ohranitev zapuščinskega premoženja ali zaščito pravic upnikov ali drugih oseb, ki so jamčile za pokojnikove dolgove, upravitelj/-i, imenovan/-i v državi članici sodišča, kjer poteka postopek, lahko kot dodatni ukrep izvaja/-jo pooblastila za upravljanje, ki jih za to področje določa pravo te države članice.
Where the powers of administration which may be exercised under the law applicable to the succession are not sufficient to preserve the assets of the estate or to protect the rights of the creditors or of other persons having guaranteed the debts of the deceased, the administrator(s) appointed in the Member State of the court seised may, on a residual basis, exercise powers of administration to that end provided for by the law of that Member State.
Delovanje upravitelja v skladu z dodatnimi pooblastili mora biti v skladu s poglavjem dednega prava o prenosu lastništva zapuščine, vključno z vsemi transakcijami upravičencev pred imenovanjem upravitelja, odgovornostjo za zapustnikove dolgove in pravicami upravičencev, tudi z morebitno pravico za sprejetje ali zavrnitev zapuščine.
The acts performed by an administrator under the residual powers should respect the law applicable to the succession as regards the transfer of ownership of succession property, including any transaction entered into by the beneficiaries prior to the appointment of the administrator, the liability for debts under the succession and the rights of the beneficiaries, including, where applicable, the right to accept or to waive the succession.
Taka dejanja bi lahko denimo pomenila odtujitev premoženja ali plačilo dolgov, če je to dovoljeno po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
Such acts could, for instance, only entail the alienation of assets or the payment of debts where this would be allowed under the law applicable to the succession.
Če po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, imenovanje upravitelja, ki je tretja oseba, spremeni odgovornost dedičev, bi bilo treba tako spremembo spoštovati.
Where under the law applicable to the succession the appointment of a third-party administrator changes the liability of the heirs, such a change of liability should be respected.
Ta uredba ne bi smela posegati v dejstvo, da lahko dediči po potrebi in tudi s pomočjo pooblaščenca za zaščito svojih pravic sprejmejo nadaljnje ukrepe, ki so na voljo po nacionalnem pravu, v skladu z ustreznimi instrumenti Unije.
This Regulation should not preclude creditors, for instance through a representative, from taking such further steps as may be available under national law, where applicable, in accordance with the relevant Union instruments, in order to safeguard their rights.
Ta uredba bi morala omogočiti, da se o začetku zapuščinskega postopka obvestijo morebitni upniki v drugih državah članicah, v katerih se nahaja premoženje.
This Regulation should allow for potential creditors in other Member States where assets are located to be informed of the opening of the succession.
Glede izvrševanja te uredbe bi bilo treba razmisliti o možnosti vzpostavitve mehanizma, morda s pomočjo portala e-pravosodje, ki bi morebitnim upnikom v drugih državah članicah omogočil dostop do pomembnih podatkov, tako da lahko oblikujejo svoje zahtevke.
In the application of this Regulation, consideration should therefore be given to the possibility of establishing a mechanism, if appropriate by way of the e-Justice portal, to enable potential creditors in other Member States to access the relevant information so that they can make their claims known.
Pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, bi moralo določati, kdo so upravičenci v posamezni dedni zadevi.
The law applicable to the succession should determine who the beneficiaries are in any given succession.
Izraz bo v večini pravnih sistemov obsegal dediče, volilojemnike in osebe, ki so upravičene do nujnega deleža, čeprav pravni položaj volilojemnikov v vseh pravnih sistemih ni enak.
Under most laws, the term ‘beneficiaries’ would cover heirs and legatees and persons entitled to a reserved share although, for instance, the legal position of legatees is not the same under all laws.
V nekaterih lahko volilojemnik prejme neposredni delež iz zapuščine, v drugih pa ima le pravico zahtevati izpolnitev volila od dedičev.
Under some laws, the legatee may receive a direct share in the estate whereas under other laws the legatee may acquire only a claim against the heirs.
Da bi zagotovili pravno varnost oseb, ki želijo vnaprej urediti svoje dedovanje, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti posebno kolizijsko pravilo v zvezi z dopustnostjo in materialno veljavnostjo razpolaganja za primer smrti.
In order to ensure legal certainty for persons wishing to plan their succession in advance, this Regulation should lay down a specific conflict-of-laws rule concerning the admissibility and substantive validity of dispositions of property upon death.
Da bi zagotovili enotno uporabo tega pravila, bi bilo treba v uredbi navesti, kateri elementi naj veljajo za elemente materialne veljavnosti.
To ensure the uniform application of that rule, this Regulation should list which elements should be considered as elements pertaining to substantive validity.
Preverjanje materialne veljavnosti razpolaganja za primer smrti bi lahko pokazalo, da je razpolaganje za primer smrti neveljavno.
The examination of the substantive validity of a disposition of property upon death may lead to the conclusion that that disposition is without legal existence.
Dednopravna pogodba je oblika razpolaganja za primer smrti, ki ima v državah članicah različno dopustnost in sprejemljivost.
An agreement as to succession is a type of disposition of property upon death the admissibility and acceptance of which vary among the Member States.
Da bi se dedne pravice, pridobljene z dednopravno pogodbo, laže priznale v državah članicah, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti, katero pravo ureja dopustnost takšnih pogodb, njihovo materialno veljavnost in njihove zavezujoče učinke za stranke, vključno s pogoji razveze.
In order to make it easier for succession rights acquired as a result of an agreement as to succession to be accepted in the Member States, this Regulation should determine which law is to govern the admissibility of such agreements, their substantive validity and their binding effects between the parties, including the conditions for their dissolution.
Pravo, ki bo v skladu s to uredbo urejalo dopustnost in materialno veljavnost razpolaganja za primer smrti in v zvezi z dednopravnimi pogodbami zavezujoče učinke takih pogodb za stranke, ne bi smelo posegati v pravice oseb, ki so po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, upravičene do nujnega deleža ali imajo drugo pravico, za katero jih oseba, za katere zapuščino gre, ne more prikrajšati.
The law which, under this Regulation, will govern the admissibility and substantive validity of a disposition of property upon death and, as regards agreements as to succession, the binding effects of such an agreement as between the parties, should be without prejudice to the rights of any person who, under the law applicable to the succession, has a right to a reserved share or another right of which he cannot be deprived by the person whose estate is involved.
Napotila na pravo, ki bi se uporabljalo za dedovanje po osebi, ki je napravila razpolaganje, če bi umrla na dan, ko je bilo razpolaganje napravljeno oziroma spremenjeno ali preklicano, v tej uredbi bi bilo treba razumeti kot napotila na pravo države, v kateri je imela zadevna oseba na ta dan običajno prebivališče, ali, če je izbrala pravo v skladu s to uredbo, pravo države, katere državljan je bila na ta dan.
Where reference is made in this Regulation to the law which would have been applicable to the succession of the person making a disposition of property upon death if he had died on the day on which the disposition was, as the case may be, made, modified or revoked, such reference should be understood as a reference to either the law of the State of the habitual residence of the person concerned on that day or, if he had made a choice of law under this Regulation, the law of the State of his nationality on that day.
razpolaganj za primer smrti
dispositions of property upon death
s pravili, ki so v skladu s
made in writing by way of rules which are consistent with those of the
Haaško konvencijo z dne 5. oktobra 1961 o koliziji zakonov glede testamentnih določb.
Hague Convention of 5 October 1961 on the conflicts of laws relating to the form of testamentary dispositions