natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
močno spodbuja izvajanje programov za usposabljanje vseh morebitnih udeležencev, zlasti o izvajanju pravil upravljanja, in poziva Komisijo, naj razvije merila za izbiro, vrednotenje in ocenjevanje projektov, pri čemer naj upošteva tudi utrjevanje poti k odličnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme proaktiven pristop, da bi pomagala javnim organom, zlasti v manj zastopanih državah članicah, izboljšati sistem upravljanja z izvajanjem ocenjevanja in izdajanjem priporočil tem organom, da bi izboljšali vloge za financiranje in vodenje projektov;
Strongly encourages the implementation of training programmes for all potential participants, particularly on the application of management rules, and calls on the Commission to develop criteria for the selection, evaluation and assessment of training projects, bearing in mind inter alia the stairways to excellence; urges the Commission to take a proactive approach to help public bodies, especially those established in under-represented Member States, to improve their management system by carrying out assessments and to issue recommendations for these bodies to improve their funding applications and project management;
ponavlja, da je za poenostavitev upravljanja v evropskem financiranju raziskav potreben kvantni preskok; je prepričan, da je osrednja prvina poenostavljanja premik s sedanjega pristopa nadzora k pristopu na osnovi zaupanja in dopuščanja tveganja, kar bi še posebej koristilo malim in srednjim podjetjem; poziva k izvajanju vseh opredeljenih ukrepov poenostavljanja v novem skupnem strateškem okviru, tudi večjega dopustnega tveganja napake, s splošnim sprejemanjem običajnih računovodskih praks, uporabo (prostovoljnih) pavšalnih plačil in zneskov, poenostavljenimi postopki za oddajo vlog in sklepanje pogodb, pravil o predfinanciranju in upravičenosti stroškov, občutnim zmanjšanjem zahtev za finančno in znanstveno poročanje, skrajšanjem časa do sklenitve pogodbe na največ šest mesecev, znatno skrajšanim časom do dodelitve podpore in izplačila sredstev ter več prožnosti pri tem, kako udeleženci organizirajo in vodijo svoje projekte in izbirajo partnerje;
Reiterates that simplification of the management of European research funding requires a quantum leap; believes that a key element in simplification is to shift from the current control-based to a more trust-based and risk-tolerant approach, which is of particular benefit for SMEs; calls for the implementation of all identified simplification measures in the new CSF, including an increased margin of tolerable risk of error, a broad acceptance of usual accounting practices, the use of lump sums and flat rates (on a voluntary basis), simplification of the application and contractual procedures and of the rules on pre-financing and the eligibility of costs, a significant reduction of the financial and scientific reporting requirements, shortening of the time-to-contract to maximum 6 months and a significant reduction of the time-to-grant and time-to-pay, and more flexibility for participants in how they organise and manage their projects and choose their partners;
je prepričan, da bi s poenostavitvijo moralo priti do zmanjšanja kombinacij stopenj financiranja in metod izračunavanja posrednih stroškov v vseh shemah financiranja, ne da bi odpravili razlikovanje med univerzami, raziskovalnimi organizacijami in industrijo;
Is convinced that simplification should lead to a reduction in the combination of funding rates and indirect costs calculation methods across financing schemes without, however, abolishing the differentiation applying for universities, research organisations and industry;
priporoča, da se določi nekaj skupnih (upravnih, finančnih in organizacijskih) pravil in načel, ki bodo enostavna za razlago in bodo veljala za vse evropske raziskovalno-razvojne in inovacijske programe in instrumente,
Recommends defining a limited set of common (administrative, financial and organisational) rules and principles that are easy to interpret and that would apply to all EU R&D&I programmes and instruments;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj olajšajo dostop do evropskih raziskovalnih programov, na primer z vzpostavitvijo enotne kontaktne točke, načela en projekt – en dokument in foruma za izmenjavo dobre prakse; ob tem poudarja, da je potrebna zlahka dostopna enotna dostopna točka do svetovanja in finančne podpore za morebitne udeležence; graja premajhno preglednost in informacije o prihodnjih pozivih za zbiranje predlogov o raziskovalnih projektih, zaradi česar se raziskovalci in inštituti ne morejo ustrezno pripraviti, tako da ne morejo sodelovati;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make access to European research programmes easier, for example by setting up a single contact point, establishing a principle of ‘one project, one document’ and setting up a forum for exchange of good practice; in this respect, reiterates the need for an easily accessible single entry point to advice and financial support for potential participants; criticises the current lack of transparency and information on upcoming calls for proposals for research projects, which results in researchers and institutes being unable to properly prepare themselves and therefore impedes their participation;
poudarja, da je treba za usklajeno politiko ustvarjanja evropske družbe, temelječe na znanju, okrepiti povezave med izobraževanjem, raziskavami in inovacijami; poudarja, da bi moral skupni strateški okvir obravnavati in zajeti vso verigo znanja, na primer prek razvoja infrastrukture, standardizacije, programov usposabljanja in ukrepov v podporo ključnim tehnologijam; spodbuja vsakršno sodelovanje med univerzami, podjetji in raziskovalnimi inštituti ter verjame, da je njegov osrednji element prenos tehnologije; poziva, naj se zagotovijo praktični instrumenti za spodbujanje prenosa tehnologije iz raziskav v uporabo v industriji, tako v storitvenem kot proizvodnem sektorju;
Points out that a coherent policy towards creating a European knowledge-based society implies strengthening the links between education, research and innovation; emphasises that the CSF should address and integrate the entire knowledge chain via, for example, infrastructure development, standardisation, training programmes and measures to support key technologies; encourages all collaboration between universities, businesses and research institutes and believes that skills and technology transfer is a vital component; asks for practical instruments to be provided to foster the transfer of technology from research to industrial application, both in services and in the manufacturing sectors;
poziva k večji medvladni udeležbi pri ukrepih skupnega načrtovanja, kar bi okrepilo sodelovanje na področju raziskav, razvoja in inovacij po vsej Evropi;
Calls for stronger intergovernmental participation under the Joint Programming Measures, which would strengthen cooperation in research, development and innovation throughout Europe;
poudarja, da so skupne tehnološke pobude in evropske tehnološke platforme pomembne, in priporoča, da se vsem javno-zasebnim partnerstvom ponudi poseben skupni okvir z jasnimi in poenostavljenimi skupnimi pogoji, tako da bo jasno ločena vloga zasebnega in javnega sektorja; poudarja, da je treba sprejeti učinkovite ukrepe za izboljšanje preglednosti in odprtega dostopa malih in srednjih podjetij in javnega raziskovalnega sektorja do tovrstnih instrumentov; poziva Komisijo, naj izvede poglobljeno analizo stanja, učinka in upravičenosti sedanjih različnih oblik javno-zasebnih partnerstev, preden bi jih konsolidirali ali podpirali ustanavljanje novih, zato da bi izboljšali njihovo upravljanje in zagotovili boljšo udeleženost najraznovrstnejših zainteresiranih strani pri pripravi raziskovalnih načrtov in omogočanju dostopa za nove udeležence; je tudi prepričan, da bi morali ti instrumenti v največji meri temeljiti na javnih prednostnih ciljih (kjer bi bili najbolj dragoceni družbeni in trajnostni rezultati) in pritegovati resnično zasebne naložbe;
Pointing out the importance of Joint Technology Initiatives (JTIs) and European Technology Platforms (ETPs), recommends offering a specific common framework for all PPPs with clear, simplified common conditions, clearly separating the role of the private sector and the public sector; stresses the need to take effective measures to improve transparency and open access to such instruments by SMEs and the public research sector; invites the Commission to carry out an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, impact and relevance of the currently running different formats of PPPs before consolidating or supporting the establishment of additional ones, in order to improve their governance to ensure better involvement of a greater variety of stakeholders both in setting the research agenda and ensuring access to newcomers; is also convinced that those instruments should be clearly driven by public priority objectives (valuing societal and sustainability results) and be leveraging real private investments;
poudarja, da bi moral biti skupni strateški okvir privlačen mehanizem financiranja za akterje iz javnega in zasebnega sektorja (tudi nevladne organizacije in organizacije civilne družbe); je prepričan, da bi morali imeti vsi udeleženci, raziskovalno-razvojni in inovacijski projekti z velikim učinkom in evropske tehnološke platforme ustrezno vlogo v razpravah o določanju prednostnih nalog in dostop do raziskovalne infrastrukture;
Stresses that the CSF should be an attractive funding mechanism for both private and public sector actors (including also NGOs and CSOs); believes that all participants in high impact R&D&I projects and ETPs should play a role in the priority-setting discussion and have access to research infrastructures;
zagovarja premik k pristopu na podlagi znanosti in poziva k odnosu na osnovi zaupanja do raziskovalcev in k večji meri sprejemanja tveganja do udeležencev v vseh fazah sistema financiranja, tudi pri vrednotenju znanosti in inovacijah; poziva k oblikovanju ustreznega modela financiranja za akademske raziskave v naslednjem okvirnem programu;
Favours moving towards a ‘science-based’ approach and calls for a trust-based attitude towards researchers and a more risk-tolerant attitude towards participants at all stages of the funding system, including science valorisation and innovation; asks for an appropriate funding model for academic research in the next FP;
meni, da skupni strateški okvir ne bi smel biti omejen samo na inovacije, ki temeljijo na raziskavah in tehnologiji, temveč bi moral podpirati tudi druge vire inovacij; poudarja, da veliko podjetij – predvsem mala in srednja – uporablja druge vire inovacij, na primer stranke, trge, uporabnike in celo zaposlene, ter da je ta oblika inovacij pogosto bolj praktična in usmerjena k reševanju konkretnih problemov, povezanih s postopki, storitvami ali izdelki, saj predlagane rešitve pogosto prešinejo zaposlene, ki so najbližje proizvodnemu procesu, trge in stranke; meni, da bi morala EU okrepiti praktične inovacije delavcev;
Believes that the CSF should not be limited to focusing on research-driven or technology-based innovation alone, but that it should support different sources of innovation; points out that many companies – especially SMEs – use other sources of innovation such as clients, markets, users and, not least, employees, and that this form of innovation is often of a more practical nature and is focused on solving specific problematic issues related to processes, services or products, since the proposed solutions are often found by the employees that are closest to the production process, markets and clients; believes, therefore, that the EU should strengthen practice-oriented, employee-driven innovation;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo prekoračeni stroški po programu Horizon 2020 revidirani; poziva Komisijo, naj analizira, kolikšen delež prekoračenih stroškov je v sedmem okvirnem programu, in naj predlaga, kako bi jih čim bolj zmanjšali;
Urges the Commission to ensure that overhead costs under HORIZON 2020 are revised; asks the Commission, therefore, to analyse what percentage the overhead costs represent in FP7 and to come forward with proposals to keep it as low as possible;
poziva, naj raziskovalni program sodelovanja v osrčju okvirnega programa, saj krepi sinergijo ter povečuje in pospešuje vpliv in razširjanje raziskovalnih projektov s svetovno uveljavljenimi partnerji iz EU in zunaj EU; je prepričan, da bi moralo biti financiranje sodelovanja v raziskavah tematsko bolj prožno (širše zastavljeni razpisi) in imeti na voljo uporabnikom prijazno ureditev, da bi privabilo izredne znanstvenike in ustrezalo potrebam velikih konzorcijev in manjših skupin; meni, da morali zaobjeti vso inovacijsko verigo od predhodnih raziskav do obsežnih pilotnih projektov in predstavitev ter po potrebi omogočiti namenski proračun sektorjem, ki so razvili strateško vizijo za spoprijemanje z družbenimi izzivi s pomočjo dolgoročnih naložbenih ciklusov;
Calls for collaborative research (the current Cooperation Programme) to be kept at the heart of the FP, reinforcing synergies to increase and accelerate the impact and dissemination of research projects performed in cooperation with partners of excellent global standing, both from within and from outside the EU; believes that funding of collaborative research should have greater thematic flexibility (broader calls) and user-friendly funding arrangements in order to attract outstanding scientists and to respond to the needs of both large consortia and smaller groups; believes that the whole innovation chain from exploratory research to large scale pilot projects and demonstrations should be covered, with dedicated ring-fenced budgets to sectors which have developed a strategic vision in order to address societal challenges with long-term investment cycles, where appropriate;
izraža pomisleke glede učinkovitosti uporabe sredstev za ustvarjanje raziskovalnih mrež odličnosti, organizacijo konferenc in prireditev ter poziva k ukrepom za okrepitev elektronskega mreženja na področju raziskav in inovacij ter k razširjanju rezultatov raziskav prek interneta;
Voices its scepticism about the effectiveness of utilising the funds for creating research networks of excellence and organising conferences and events and calls for a strengthening of electronic networking measures for research and innovation and the dissemination of research results via the Internet;
dvomi, da je pogosto mogoče financirati samo en predlog iz javnega razpisa, a se tako tratijo sredstva, vložena v pripravo in vrednotenje predlogov, odlične ideje pa ostanejo brez financiranja; poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o možnem financiranju odličnih, neizbranih predlogov prek dodatnega raziskovalnega proračuna (ki bi dopolnjeval sredstva za raziskave), kamor bi pritegnili sredstva držav članic ter regionalnih in strukturnih skladov;
Expresses its scepticism about whether it is often possible to finance a single proposal per call, resulting in a waste of the resources invested in their preparation and evaluation and the non-funding of excellent ideas; calls on the Commission to investigate the possibility of funding excellent, non-selected proposals, through an additional research budget (matching research funds) which will also involve Member States and regional and structural funds;
poziva h konsolidaciji večdisciplinarnih in transdisciplinarnih raziskav in k priznanju njihove socialne razsežnosti; ob tem želi spomniti, da bi bilo treba velike družbene izzive reševati tako s tehnološkim odzivanjem kakor tudi z evropskimi družboslovnimi in humanističnimi raziskavami ter socialnimi inovacijami, ki ostajajo poglavitno orodje za uspešno spoprijemanje s temi izzivi; zato je prepričan, da bi bilo treba v skupnem strateškem okviru zagotoviti neodvisno tematsko področje, ki bi zajemalo družboslovne in ekonomske znanosti in humanistiko, in ga kot večjo sestavino vključiti v vse ukrepe, ki tečejo po opredeljenih načrtih;
Calls for consolidation of multi- and transdisciplinary research and recognition of the social dimension of research; in this context, recalls that grand societal challenges should be dealt with – apart from technological responses – by means of European research in social sciences and humanities and social innovation, which remain a pivotal asset in successfully addressing those challenges; believes therefore that both an independent subject area covering ‘social and economic sciences and the humanities’, and inclusion of it as an increased component in all agenda-driven actions should be secured in the CSF;
da bi še nadalje spodbujali zanimanje in udeležbo državljanov in civilne družbe v raziskavah, poziva k nadaljevanju podprograma „Znanost v družbi“ kot samostojne teme in tudi k njegovemu horizontalnemu širjenju, da bi zajel velike družbene izzive; poleg tega meni, da bi morala Komisija podpirati nadaljnji razvoj in širše razširjanje etičnih smernic ter nadaljnji razvoj instrumentov, namenjenih organizacijam civilne družbe;
In order further to attract the interest and involvement of citizens and civil society in research, calls for the continuation of the Science in Society theme as a stand-alone and for its horizontal expansion to cover the great societal challenges; in addition, believes that the Commission should support further development and wider dissemination of guidelines on ethics, and the further development of instruments designed for Civil Society Organisations (CSOs);
poziva k preglednejšemu in bolj participativnemu določanju raziskovalnih prednostih nalog in ciljev z uravnoteženo udeležbo vseh sodelujočih, vključno z znanstveno skupnostjo, raziskovalci (tudi iz manjših raziskovalnih organizacij), javnim sektorjem, organizacijami civilne družbe ter malimi in srednjimi podjetji; poziva k ustanovitvi posebne platforme za dialog med organizacijami civilne družbe in raziskovalci ter za določitev prednostnih področij raziskav v posameznih sektorjih; meni, da bi bilo treba spodbujati tudi posebne platforme za tesnejše sodelovanje malih in srednjih podjetij in raziskovalcev;
Calls for research priorities and objectives to be set in a more transparent and participatory way, through the balanced involvement of players, including the scientific community, researchers (also from smaller research organisations), the public sector, CSO organisations and SMEs; calls for the creation of a specific platform for dialogue between CSOs and researchers for discussing research priorities areas in specific sectors; believes that specific platforms for closer interaction of SMEs and researchers should also be promoted;
meni, da ni pomembno ocenjevanje in vrednotenje posameznih raziskovalnih programov samo z ekonomskega vidika, temveč tudi vrednotenje z družbenega in etičnega vidika ter vidika trajnosti, ki ga je treba izboljšati in širše spodbujati tako na evropski kot na nacionalni ravni; podpira pobude Komisije na tem področju, na primer razvoj načel odgovornih raziskav in inovacij, ter spodbuja njihovo nadaljnjo promocijo in uporabo;
Believes that not only economic, but also societal, ethical and sustainability assessment and evaluation of the specific research programmes is an important process that must be improved and more widely promoted, at both European and Member State level; supports the Commission's initiatives in this field, such as the development of Responsible Research and Innovation principles, and encourages their further promotion and uptake;
poziva k ravnovesju med projekti od spodaj navzgor (skupnimi, kot je sedanja odprta shema za prihodnje in nastajajoče tehnologije) in projekti od zgoraj navzdol (veliki družbeni izzivi), pa tudi k omogočanju manjših projektov in sodelovalnih raziskav od spodaj navzgor; meni, da bi z zmanjšanjem ovir za vstop v projekte sodelovanja dosegli močnejše znanstvene zmogljivosti; je prepričan, da je treba strateške prednostne naloge kombinirati s porajajočimi se problemi; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi študijo o najboljšem razmerju med tema vrstama projektov z vidika družbene odgovornosti in finančne izvedljivosti; poudarja, da se je treba pri določanju raziskovalnih načrtov posvetovati in sodelovati z raziskovalci, industrijo in akterji civilne družbe;
Calls for a balance to be kept between bottom-up (such as the current FET-open scheme) and top-down projects (‘grand societal challenges’), as well as for smaller bottom-up projects and bottom-up collaborative research to be facilitated; takes the view that lower entry barriers for collaborative projects would lead to a reinforcement of scientific capacity; believes that strategic priorities must be combined with emerging problems; asks the Commission to study the balance between bottom-up and top-down projects and to consider it both from a social and a financial point of view; stresses the need to consult and work together with researchers, industry and civil society actors, in order to set the research agendas;
podpira male in srednje projekte kot težišče financiranja raziskav v prihodnje; meni, da lahko univerze in mala in srednja podjetja lažje in z manj stroški upravljajo male in srednje projekte; na ta način bodo lahko povečali dosedanjo nezadovoljivo količino vlog;
Is in favour of small and medium-sized projects forming the focus of future research funding; believes that small and medium-sized projects are easier and less costly for universities and SMEs to manage; and that they will also enable to increase the hitherto unsatisfactory success rates of applications;
meni, da se lahko v primerih, ko inovacijski modeli ne izpolnjujejo nekaterih družbenih potreb, uporabijo novi javni sistemi izdajanja dovoljenj in nagrade za spodbujanje inovacij, zato da se raziskave osredotočijo na nova področja in da se zagotovi učinkovitost javnih izdatkov; poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej oblikuje pilotno pobudo za nagrade za spodbujanje v zdravstvu;
Believes that, when certain societal needs are not being met by our present innovation models, new public licensing schemes and innovation inducement prizes can be used to focus research in these areas and to assure the efficacy of public expenditure; calls on the Commission to launch as soon as possible a pilot initiative for inducement prizes in the medical sector;
poziva k usklajenemu obravnavanju celotne raziskovalne, razvojne in inovacijske verige z izvajanjem predpisov glede preglednosti in jasnim usklajevanjem med različnimi generalnimi direktorati Komisije, ki so pristojni za financiranje raziskav in inovacij;
Calls for coherent coverage of the full R&D&I chain though the implementation of transparency rules and clear coordination between the different Commission DGs dealing with research and innovation funding;
poziva, naj se po potrebi poglobi dvostransko mednarodno sodelovanje s strateškimi partnerji Evropske unije, tudi s hitro rastočimi državami, kot so države BRIK, da bi bolje reševali svetovne izzive; opominja, da bi poenostavljeni postopki in skrajšani kratki roki za odobritev vlog privabili k sodelovanju raziskovalce iz tretjih držav; poudarja, da je treba okrepiti razvoj znanstvenih zmogljivosti v sosednjih državah na podlagi boljšega usklajevanja skupnega strateškega okvira z instrumenti sosedske politike EU; je prepričan, da sta učinkovita okrepitev gradnje zmogljivosti in vzpostavitev pravičnih in obsežnih partnerstev z državami v razvoju odločilnega pomena za spodbuditev trajnostnega razvoja teh držav;
Calls for an intensification of international cooperation, where appropriate, with the strategic partners of the European Union, including fast growing countries such as the BRICS countries, on a reciprocal basis, in order to better tackle global challenges; recalls that participation of third-country researchers would be encouraged by more simplified procedures and significantly shorter lead times for applications; stresses the need for a stronger scientific capacity building in neighbouring countries, based on a better coordination of the Common Strategic Framework with EU neighbourhood policy instruments; believes that effective reinforcement of capacity building and the establishment of fair and comprehensive partnerships with developing countries is crucial to boosting their sustainable development;