natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je poslanec Evropskega parlamenta Bruno Gollnisch zahteval zaščito svoje parlamentarne imunitete v zvezi z ukrepi francoskih oblasti, ki po njegovem mnenju omejujejo njegovo svobodo, izvajajo pa se v okviru sodne preiskave v primeru tožbe in odškodninskega zahtevka (
whereas Bruno Gollnisch, a Member of the European Parliament, has requested the defence of his parliamentary immunity in connection with measures which he claims restrict his freedom applied by the French authorities as part of the judicial investigation of an action and claim for compensation (
), ki ga je 26. januarja 2009 proti neimenovani osebi zaradi spodbujanja k rasnemu sovraštvu vložila Mednarodna liga proti rasizmu in antisemitizmu,
) brought by the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism on 26 January 2009 against an unnamed person for incitement to racial hatred,
ker v zahtevi za zaščito imunitete ni bilo sklicevanja na člen 8 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije in se ga zato ne uporabi,
whereas Article 8 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union was not invoked in the request for defence of immunity and therefore does not apply,
ker člen 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije, na katerega se je Bruno Gollnisch v svojemu pismu predsedniku Parlamenta z dne 10. junija 2010 izrecno skliceval in ki velja v tem primeru, določa, da med zasedanji Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države; in ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu,
whereas, in accordance with Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, which was expressly invoked by Bruno Gollnisch in his letter to the President of 10 June 2010 and which is applicable in the present case, during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament; and whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
ker se v skladu z drugim odstavkom 26. člena ustave Francoske republike ’nobenega poslanca ne sme prijeti zaradi kaznivega dejanja ali prekrška, niti se ga ne sme pripreti ali mu kako drugače odvzeti prostosti brez dovoljenja skupščine, katere poslanec je; to dovoljenje ni potrebno v primeru hudega kaznivega dejanja, zagrešenega in
whereas, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 26 of the Constitution of the French Republic, ’no Member of Parliament may be arrested or subject to any other measure depriving him or her of freedom or restricting that freedom as a result of criminal or minor offences without the authorisation of the Assembly to which he or she belongs, except if a serious crime has been committed, in the event of
ali v primeru dokončne obsodbe’, in ker se v skladu s tretjim odstavkom 26. člena ’pripor, druge oblike odvzema prostosti ali kazensko preganjanje poslanca ustavi do konca zasedanja, če to zahteva skupščina, katere poslanec je’,
or if a final judgment has been handed down’, and whereas, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 26, ’detention, measures depriving the Member of his or her freedom or restricting that freedom or the prosecution of the Member of Parliament shall be suspended during the session if the Assembly of which he or she is a Member so demands’,
ker ima Parlament pri pripravi sklepa o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete enega svojih poslancev veliko mero diskrecijske pravice Zadeva T-42/06
whereas Parliament has a broad measure of discretion to determine the direction it wishes to give to a decision following a request to defend the immunity of one of its Members Case T-42/06
, odstavek 101.
, at paragraph 101.
ker v tem primeru Parlament ni našel dokaza, da naj bi šlo za
whereas in the present case Parliament has found no evidence of
, torej dovolj utemeljen sum, da je bil primer sprožen z namenom, da bi se poslancu politično škodovalo;
, i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the case has been brought with the intention of causing political damage to the Member,
ker primer ne zadeva političnih dejavnosti Bruna Gollnischa kot poslanca Evropskega parlamenta; ker namesto tega zadeva dejavnosti Bruna Gollnischa kot člana sveta regije Rhône-Alpes, ki so povsem regionalne in lokalne narave, saj je bil v to funkcijo izvoljen na neposrednih splošnih volitvah, funkcija pa je ločena od mandata poslanca Evropskega parlamenta,
whereas the case does not fall within the scope of Bruno Gollnisch's political activities as a Member of the European Parliament; whereas it concerns instead activities of a purely regional and local nature as a Rhône-Alpes regional councillor, a mandate to which Bruno Gollnisch was elected by direct universal suffrage and which is distinct from that of Member of the European Parliament,
ker je Bruno Gollnisch pojasnil, zakaj je njegova politična skupina v svetu regije Rhône-Alpes objavila sporočilo za javnost, zaradi katerega je zahteval zaščito imunitete: dejal je, da je sporočilo za javnost napisala ekipa stranke Nacionalna fronta v tej regiji, skupaj z odgovorno osebo za komunikacije, ki je bila ’pooblaščena za dajanje izjav v imenu izvoljenih uradnih predstavnikov Nacionalne fronte’; ker bi uveljavljanje parlamentarne imunitete v takšnih okoliščinah pomenilo neustrezno uporabo pravil, katerih namen je preprečiti motnje v delovanju in neodvisnosti Parlamenta,
whereas Bruno Gollnisch has given an explanation as to why the press release which has prompted the request for defence of immunity was issued by his political group in the Rhône-Alpes Regional Council, stating that it had been written by the Front National team in that region, including its head of communications, who was ’empowered to speak on behalf of the Front National's elected officials’; whereas the application of parliamentary immunity to such a situation would constitute an undue extension of those rules, which are intended to prevent any interference with the functioning and independence of Parliament,
ker naj bi francoski organi proti Brunu Gollnischu uvedli določene ukrepe, ki naj bi omejevali njegovo svobodo, še preden so zahtevali odvzem njegove imunitete, kar je obžalovanja vredna kršitev pristojnosti Parlamenta; ker pa so zdaj francoski organi uradno zahtevali odvzem njegove imunitete, da bi v prihodnosti lahko proti njemu uvedli takšne ukrepe, zaradi česar v tem pogledu ni več treba braniti imunitete Bruna Gollnischa,
whereas it is a regrettable infringement of Parliament's prerogatives that the French authorities should have taken what appear to be certain measures restricting Bruno Gollnisch's freedom prior to requesting the waiver of his immunity; whereas, however, given that the French authorities have now formally requested the waiver of his immunity in order to take such measures in the future, it is no longer necessary to defend Bruno Gollnisch's immunity in that regard,
ker ni naloga Parlamenta, temveč pristojnih sodnih organov, da odločijo, ob spoštovanju vseh demokratičnih jamstev, v kolikšni meri je bila kršena francoska zakonodaja o spodbujanju k rasnemu sovraštvu in kakšne bi bile lahko pravne posledice,
whereas it is not for Parliament but for the competent judicial authorities to decide, whilst respecting all democratic guarantees, to what extent French law on incitement to racial hatred has been broken and what the judicial consequences might be,
ker torej parlamentarne imunitete Bruna Gollnischa ne bi smeli zaščititi,
whereas Bruno Gollnisch's parliamentary immunity should therefore not be defended,
se glede na omenjena dejstva odloči, da ne bo zaščitil imunitete in privilegijev Bruna Gollnischa;
Decides in the light of the above not to defend the immunity and privileges of Bruno Gollnisch;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in poročilo pristojnega odbora nemudoma posreduje pristojnemu organu Francoske republike in Brunu Gollnischu.
Instructs its President to forward this decision and the report of its competent committee immediately to the competent authority of the French Republic and to Bruno Gollnisch.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Brunu Gollnischu ( 2010/2284(IMM) )
European Parliament decision of 10 May 2011 on the request for waiver of the immunity of Bruno Gollnisch ( 2010/2284(IMM) )
ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Brunu Gollnischu, ki so jo 3. novembra 2010 posredovali francoski organi, na plenarnem zasedanju pa je bila razglašena 24. novembra 2010,
having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Bruno Gollnisch, forwarded by the French authorities on 3 November 2010 and announced in plenary sitting on 24 November 2010,
ob upoštevanju člena 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije z dne 8. aprila 1965 in člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
having regard to Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union of 8 April 1965 , and to Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
ob upoštevanju 26. člena ustave Republike Francije,
having regard to Article 26 of the Constitution of the French Republic,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0155/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0155/2011 ),
ker je francoski javni tožilec zahteval odvzem poslanske imunitete poslancu Evropskega parlamenta Brunu Gollnischu, da bi omogočili preiskavo v zvezi s tožbo o domnevnem spodbujanju k rasnemu sovraštvu in po potrebi sojenje Brunu Gollnischu pred francoskim sodiščem prve stopnje, višjim sodiščem in kasacijskem sodiščem,
whereas a French public prosecutor has requested the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Bruno Gollnisch, a Member of the European Parliament, so that a complaint alleging incitement to racial hatred can be investigated and so that, if appropriate, Bruno Gollnisch can be tried before the French Court of First Instance, the Appeal Court and the Court of Cassation,
ker se odvzem imunitete Brunu Gollnischu nanaša na domnevno kaznivo dejanje spodbujanja k rasnemu sovraštvu v sporočilu za javnost, ki ga je 3. oktobra 2008 objavil regionalni odbor stranke Nacionalna fronta v regiji Rhône-Alpe, Bruno Gollnisch pa je bil takrat predsednik odbora,
whereas the waiver of the immunity of Bruno Gollnisch relates to an alleged offence of incitement to racial hatred as a result of a press release issued on 3 October 2008 by the Rhône-Alpes Region ’Front National’ Group, of which Bruno Gollnisch was President,
ker v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije med zasedanji Evropskega parlamenta njegovi poslanci uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države; in ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanja pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu,
whereas, in accordance with Article 9 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament; and whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members,
ker se v skladu s 26. členom ustave Francoske republike nobenega poslanca ne sme aretirati zaradi kaznivega dejanja ali prekrška, niti se ga ne sme pripreti ali mu kako drugače omejiti prostost brez dovoljenja skupščine, katere poslanec je, razen v primeru hudega kaznivega dejanja, zagrešenega
whereas, in accordance with Article 26 of the Constitution of the French Republic, no Member of Parliament may be arrested or subject to any other measure depriving him or her of freedom or restricting that freedom as a result of criminal or minor offences without the authorisation of the Assembly to which he or she belongs, except if a serious crime has been committed, in the event of
in flagrante delicto
flagrante delicto
, ali dokončne obsodbe,
or if a final judgment has been handed down,
ker v tem primeru Parlament ni našel dokaza, da naj bi šlo za
whereas, in the present case, Parliament has found no evidence of
ker zahteva francoskih oblasti ne zadeva politične dejavnosti Bruna Gollnischa kot poslanca Evropskega parlamenta; ker namesto tega zadeva dejavnosti Bruna Gollnischa kot člana sveta regije Rhône-Alpes, ki so povsem regionalne in lokalne narave, saj je bil v to funkcijo izvoljen na neposrednih splošnih volitvah, funkcija pa je ločena od mandata poslanca Evropskega parlamenta,
whereas the request from the French authorities does not relate to Bruno Gollnisch's political activities as a Member of the European Parliament; whereas it concerns instead activities of a purely regional and local nature as a Rhône-Alpes regional councillor, a mandate to which Bruno Gollnisch was elected by direct universal suffrage and which is distinct from that of Member of the European Parliament,
ker je Bruno Gollnisch pojasnil, zakaj je njegova politična skupina v svetu regije Rhône-Alpes objavila sporočilo za javnost, zaradi katerega je zahteval zaščito imunitete: dejal je, da je sporočilo za javnost napisala ekipa stranke Nacionalna fronta v tej regiji, skupaj z odgovorno osebo za komunikacije, ki je bila ’pooblaščena za dajanje izjav v imenu izvoljenih uradnih predstavnikov Nacionalne fronte’; ker bi uveljavljanje parlamentarne imunitete v takšnih okoliščinah pomenilo neustrezno uporabo pravil, katerih namen je preprečiti motnje v delovanju in neodvisnosti Parlamenta,
whereas Bruno Gollnisch has given an explanation as to why the press release which has prompted the request for waiver of immunity was issued by his political group in the Rhône-Alpes Regional Council, stating that it had been written by the Front National team in that region, including its head of communications, who was ’empowered to speak on behalf of the Front National's elected officials’; whereas the application of parliamentary immunity to such a situation would constitute an undue extension of those rules, which are intended to prevent any interference with the functioning and independence of Parliament,
ker ni naloga Parlamenta, temveč pristojnih sodnih organov, da odločijo, ob spoštovanju vseh demokratičnih jamstev, v kolikšni meri je bila kršena francoska zakonodaja o spodbujanju k rasnemu sovraštvu in kakšne naj bodo pravne posledice,
whereas it is not for Parliament but for the competent judicial authorities to decide, whilst respecting all democratic guarantees, to what extent French law on incitement to racial hatred has been broken and what the judicial consequences might be,
ker je zato primerno, da se v tem primeru priporoči odvzem imunitete,
whereas it is therefore appropriate to recommend a waiver of parliamentary immunity in this instance,
se odloči, da Brunu Gollnischu odvzame imuniteto;
Decides to waive the immunity of Bruno Gollnisch;
ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (16581/2010),
having regard to the draft Council decision (16581/2010),
ob upoštevanju osnutka Sporazuma o varstvu in trajnostnem razvoju območja Prespanskega parka (16581/2010),
having regard to the draft Agreement on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Prespa Park Area (16581/2010),
ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 192(1) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0007/2011 ),
having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192(1) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0007/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0078/2011 ),
having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0078/2011 ),
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in Albanije ter Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, of Albania and of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (05571/2011),
having regard to the draft Council decision (05571/2011),
ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma o ukrepih države pristanišča za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter njegovo odpravljanje (05571/2011),
having regard to the draft Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing (05571/2011),
ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 43(2) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0068/2011 ),
having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 43(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0068/2011 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za ribištvo ( A7-0142/2011 ),
having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries ( A7-0142/2011 ),
odobri potrditev sporazuma;
Consents to approval of the agreement;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj v okviru trgovinskih sporazumov, regionalnih organizacij za upravljanje ribištva (RFMO), sporazumov o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju in razvojne politike Unije dejavno spodbuja podpis, ratifikacijo in izvajanje sporazuma o ukrepih države pristanišča za preprečevanje nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova, za odvračanje od njega ter njegovo odpravljanje;
Calls on the European Commission to actively promote the signing, ratification and implementation of the Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing in the context of trade agreements, Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs), Fisheries Partnership Agreements and the Union's development policy;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter generalnemu direktorju Organizacije za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO).
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the Director-General of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 s priporočili Komisiji o predlaganih začasnih ukrepih za zamrznitev in razkritje dolžnikovega premoženja v čezmejnih primerih ( 2009/2169(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 10 May 2011 with recommendations to the Commission on proposed interim measures for the freezing and disclosure of debtors’ assets in cross-border cases ( 2009/2169(INI) )
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2007 o zeleni knjigi o izboljšanju učinkovitosti izvrševanja sodnih odločb v Evropski uniji: zaplemba bančnih računov UL C 263 E, 16.10.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2007 on the Green Paper on improving the efficiency of the enforcement of judgments in the European Union: the attachment of bank accounts OJ C 263 E, 16.10.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. aprila 2009 o učinkovitem izvrševanju sodnih odločb v Evropski uniji: preglednost dolžnikovega premoženja UL C 184 E, 8.7.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 22 April 2009 on the effective enforcement of judgments in the European Union: the transparency of debtors’ assets OJ C 184 E, 8.7.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2009 o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu: območje svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane – stockholmski program UL C 285 E, 21.10.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2009 on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen – Stockholm programme OJ C 285 E, 21.10.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju stockholmskega programa za obdobje 2010–2014: odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi svojim državljanom in jih varuje UL C 115, 4.5.2010, str.
having regard to the Stockholm Programme for 2010-2014 – An open and secure Europe serving and protecting its citizens OJ C 115, 4.5.2010, p.
, zlasti točke 3.4.2 programa,
, and in particular point 3.4.2 thereof,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenja Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A7-0147/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A7-0147/2011 ),
ker je notranji trg najpomembnejše orodje Unije za spodbujanje rasti po finančni krizi; ker je bistvenega pomena, da se milijonom podjetij in državljanov, ki uporabljajo notranji trg ter koristijo pravico do bivanja, dela in potovanja po vsej Evropski uniji, omogočijo učinkovita pravna sredstva, kadar imajo zahtevek zoper druge državljane ali podjetja,
whereas the Union's most important tool in promoting growth in the aftermath of the financial crisis is its internal market; whereas it is essential that the millions of businesses and citizens who make use of the internal market and of the right to live, work and travel throughout the EU have effective remedies in the event that they have a claim against another citizen or business,
ker sta za državljane in podjetja postala notranji trg in območje svobode, varnosti in pravice resničnost samo na tistih področjih, kjer se pravo Unije, zlasti na civilnopravnem področju, učinkovito izvaja od prenosa in ozaveščanja do uporabe in izvrševanja,
whereas the internal market and the area of freedom, security and justice become a reality for citizens and businesses only where Union law, in particular in the area of civil justice, is effectively applied, from transposition and awareness-raising to application and enforcement,
ker je trenutna raven uspešnih čezmejnih izterjav dolgovanega premoženja tako fizičnih kot pravnih oseb izredno nizka; ker tako stanje odvrača od čezmejnega trgovanja, sporoča neposlušnim dolžnikom, da ne bodo kaznovani, in zavira gospodarsko učinkovitost Unije,
whereas the current level of successful cross-border debt recovery is remarkably low, as regards both the assets of natural persons and those of undertakings; whereas this state of affairs discourages cross-border trade, sends a message of impunity to recalcitrant debtors and hinders the Union's economic performance,
ker so v primerih, ko ima dolžnik premoženje v več državah članicah, stroški čezmejne izterjave dolgov za upnike trenutno previsoki, da bi lahko zahtevali izterjavo; ker je čas, da se ta postopek izterjave poenostavi in pospeši,
whereas the cost of cross-border debt recovery is currently prohibitive for creditors in cases where a debtor has assets in several Member States; whereas the time has come to simplify and speed up this recovery process,
ker izjemno visoki stroški negativno vplivajo na širjenje čezmejnih posojil in celo čezmejnih poslovnih transakcij, kar resno ovira polno delovanje notranjega trga,
whereas such prohibitive costs have a negative impact on the extension of cross-border loans and even cross-border commercial transactions, representing a major barrier for the full functioning of the internal market,