natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je seznanjen z razvojem institucionaliziranih javno-zasebnih partnerstev v Uniji od devetdesetih let 20. stoletja, med drugim v sektorju prometa, na področju javnih zgradb in naprav ter na področju okolja, kot oblik sodelovanja med javnimi organi in zasebnim sektorjem ter kot dodatnega orodja za infrastrukturne storitve in osnovne javne storitve; kljub vsemu izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi nekaterih temeljnih težav, ki jih povzročajo javno-zasebna partnerstva, in vztraja, da je treba pri oblikovanju takšnih partnerstev v prihodnje upoštevati nauke iz preteklosti in popraviti pretekle pomanjkljivosti;
Takes note of the development since the 1990‘s of institutionalised public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the Union, inter alia in the transport sector, in the area of public buildings and equipment, and the environment, as forms of cooperation between public authorities and the private sector and an additional delivery vehicle for infrastructure and strategic public services; is, however, concerned about some underlying problems incurred by PPPs and insists that the design of future PPPs must take into account lessons learned and rectify past deficiencies;
je seznanjen s prejšnjimi splošno pozitivnimi izkušnjami pri uporabi inovativnih finančnih instrumentov – vključno z mehanizmi za kombiniranje subvencij in posojil ter mehanizmi za delitev tveganj, na primer instrumentom garancij za posojila za projekte v okviru vseevropskega prometnega omrežja, Skladom za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja in instrumenti kohezijske politike (JEREMIE, JESSICA, JASPERS in JASMINE) – za uresničevanje posameznih ciljev politik; meni, da bi Unija morala sprejeti ukrepe zlasti za povečanje uporabe sredstev EU kot katalizatorja za privabljanje dodatnega financiranja iz EIB, Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj, drugih mednarodnih finančnih ustanov in zasebnega sektorja;
Takes note of the previous generally positive experience of the use of innovative financial instruments -including grant and loan blending and risk-sharing mechanisms, such as the Loan Guarantee Instrument for Trans-European Transport Network projects (LGTT), the Risk Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) and the instruments of cohesion policy (JEREMIE, JESSICA, JASPERS and JASMINE)- in order to address a specific policy objective; considers that the Union should take action notably to enhance the use of the EU funds as a catalyst for attracting additional financing from the EIB, EBRD, other international financial institutions and the private sector;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga ukrepe za širitev sistema inovativnega financiranja, ki bi sledili njegovemu podrobnemu pregledu in natančni oceni potreb po javnih in zasebnih vlaganjih, kot tudi metodologijo za usklajevanje financiranj iz različnih virov; poziva države članice, naj poskrbijo, da bo njihov nacionalni pravni okvir omogočal izvajanje teh sistemov; zato poziva k vsebinski okrepitvi regulativnega, proračunskega in operativnega okvira teh mehanizmov, da bi se zagotovila njihova učinkovitost glede spodbujanja naložb, trajnosti, ustrezne uporabe sredstev EU ter ustrezen nadzor, poročanje in odgovornost; poleg tega poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti količinsko opredelitev in ustrezno upoštevanje povezanih tveganj;
Calls therefore on the Commission to propose measures to extend the system of innovative financing, after its detailed examination and following a precise assessment of public and private investment needs as well as a methodology for the coordination of funding from different sources; calls on Member States to ensure that their national legal framework enables the implementation of these systems; calls, therefore, for substantive strengthening of the regulatory, budgetary and operational framework of these mechanisms, in order to ensure their effectiveness in terms of leveraging investment, sustainability, proper use of EU resources and to guarantee adequate monitoring, reporting and accountability; insists moreover on the need to ensure that underlying risks are quantified and duly taken into account;
opozarja na zgodovinske težave pri iskanju zasebnih vlagateljev za obsežne projekte EU; se zaveda, da so zaradi finančne krize zasebni vlagatelji še manj naklonjeni financiranju projektov EU in da je kriza razkrila potrebo po obnovitvi zadostnega zaupanja, ki bi velikim investicijskim projektom omogočilo pridobivanje potrebne podpore; poudarja, da bo potrebna podpora proračuna EU v kratkoročnem in dolgoročnem okviru, da bi pritegnili in vključili zasebna sredstva za projekte v interesu EU, zlasti za tiste projekte z evropsko dodano vrednostjo, ki so gospodarsko upravičeni, ampak se ne zdijo tržno upravičeni;
Notes the historical difficulties of finding private investors for large scale EU projects; recognises that the financial crisis has made private investors even more reluctant to finance EU projects and has revealed the need to rebuild sufficient confidence to allow major investment projects to attract the support they need; stresses that the support of the EU budget will be needed, in short as well as longer term, to attract and mobilise private funds towards projects of EU interest, especially for those projects with European added value that are economically viable but are not considered commercially viable;
zato pozdravlja pobudo o projektnih obveznicah strategije Evropa 2020 kot mehanizmu za delitev tveganj z Evropsko investicijsko banko, ki zagotavlja omejeno podporo iz proračuna EU, kar bi moralo omogočiti doseganje učinka finančnega vzvoda s sredstvi EU in povečati zanimanje zasebnih vlagateljev za sodelovanje pri prednostnih projektih EU v skladu s cilji strategije Evropa 2020; poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi dokončno oblikovan predlog o projektnih obveznicah EU, ki bo temeljil na obstoječih izkušnjah s skupnimi instrumenti EU in Evropske investicijske banke, ter naj vključi jasna in pregledna merila za upravičenost in izbor projektov; opozarja, da bodo projekti, ki so v interesu EU in ustvarjajo majhen prihodek, še naprej zahtevali financiranje prek subvencij; je zaskrbljen, ker bi omejen obseg proračuna EU lahko omejil nudenje dodatnega učinka vzvoda za nove pobude;
Welcomes, therefore, the Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, as a risk-sharing mechanism with the European Investment Bank (EIB), providing capped support from the EU budget, that should leverage the EU funds and attract additional interest of private investors for participating in priority EU projects in line with Europe 2020 objectives; calls on the Commission to present a fully fledged proposal on EU project bonds, building on the existing experience with joint EU-EIB instruments, and to include clear and transparent criteria for project eligibility and selection; reminds, that projects of EU interest which generate little revenue will continue to require financing through grants; is concerned that the limited size of the EU budget might eventually impose limitations to providing additional leverage for new initiatives;
poudarja potrebo po zagotovitvi čim večje preglednosti, odgovornosti in demokratičnega nadzora inovativnih finančnih instrumentov in mehanizmov, ki zadevajo proračun EU; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga okvir za izvajanje in upravičenost projektov, določen z običajnim zakonodajnim postopkom, ki bo zagotovil stalen pretok informacij in sodelovanje proračunskega organa glede uporabe teh instrumentov v Uniji, tako da bo lahko Parlament preveril, ali so bile izpolnjene njegove politične prednostne naloge, kot tudi okrepljen nadzor nad temi instrumenti s strani Evropskega računskega sodišča;
Reiterates the need to ensure utmost transparency, accountability and democratic scrutiny for innovative financial instruments and mechanisms that involve the EU budget; calls on the Commission to propose an implementation and project eligibility framework -to be decided through the ordinary legislative procedure- that would ensure a continuous flow of information and participation of the budgetary authority regarding the use of these instruments across the Union, allowing Parliament to verify that its political priorities are met, as well as a strengthened control on such instruments from the European Court of Auditors;
Zagotavljanje dobrega finančnega upravljanja
Ensuring sound financial management
meni, da morata biti izboljšanje izvajanja in kakovost porabe vodilni načeli za doseganje optimalne uporabe proračunskih sredstev EU ter za zasnovo in upravljanje programov in dejavnosti po letu 2013;
Considers that improving implementation and quality of spending should constitute guiding principles for achieving the optimal use of the EU budget and for the design and management of the programmes and activities post 2013;
nadalje poudarja, da mora zasnova programov porabe veliko pozornost namenjati jasnosti ciljev, popolni skladnosti s pravnim redom Skupnosti in medsebojnemu dopolnjevanju instrumentov in ukrepov, usklajevanju in poenostavljanju pravil glede upravičenosti in izvajanja, preglednosti ter polni in dogovorjeni odgovornosti; poudarja pomen upoštevanja vidika spola pri pripravi proračuna, kar je orodje dobrega upravljanja za izboljšanje učinkovitosti in poštenosti;
Stresses, furthermore, that the design of spending programmes should pay utmost attention to the principles of clarity of objectives, full compliance with the community acquis and complementarity of instruments and actions, harmonisation and simplification of eligibility and implementation rules, transparency, and full and agreed accountability; underlines the importance of gender budgeting as a good governance tool to improve efficiency and fairness;
poudarja zlasti, da bi morala biti poenostavitev pravil in postopkov ključna horizontalna prednostna naloga, in je prepričan, da bi ključno vlogo pri tem morala igrati revizija finančne uredbe;
Emphasises, in particular, that the simplification of rules and procedures should be a key horizontal priority and is convinced that the revision of the Financial Regulation should play a crucial role in this respect;
poudarja, da je treba izboljšanje finančnega upravljanja v Uniji podpreti s pozornim spremljanjem napredka na Komisiji in v državah članicah; vztraja, da bi države članice morale prevzeti odgovornost za pravilno uporabo in upravljanje sredstev EU ter za izdajo letnih nacionalnih izjav o uporabi sredstev EU na ustrezni politični ravni;
Stresses that the improvement of the financial management in the Union must be supported by a close monitoring of progress in the Commission and in the Member States; insists that Member States should assume responsibility for the correct use and the management of EU funds and issue annual national declarations on the use of EU funds at the appropriate political level;
poudarja potrebo po obvladovanju dviganja ravni neporavnanih obveznostih (RAL); opozarja, da bo vrednost RAL glede na podatke Komisije do konca leta 2013 znašala 217 milijard EUR; ugotavlja, da je pri izvajanju večletnih programov določena raven RAL neizogibna, toda poudarja, da obstoj neplačanih obveznosti po definiciji zahteva izvedbo ustreznih plačil; se zato ne strinja s pristopom Sveta, da bo vnaprej določil raven plačil, ne da bi upošteval točno oceno dejanskih potreb; si bo zato v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru v celotnem letnem proračunskem postopku prizadeval za zmanjšanje razlike med odobritvami za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvami plačil, in sicer z ustreznim povišanjem ravni plačil;
Emphasises the need to address the trend of a growing level of outstanding commitments (RAL); recalls that, according to the Commission, the level of RAL will by the end of 2013 amount to EUR 217 billion; notes that a certain level of RAL is unavoidable when multiannual programmes are implemented, but underlines nevertheless that the existence of outstanding commitments by definition requires corresponding payments to be made; does therefore not agree with the approach by the Council to decide on the level of payments a priori, without taking into account an accurate assessment of the actual needs; will therefore do its utmost throughout the annual budget procedure in the next MFF to reduce the discrepancy between commitment and payment appropriations through increasing the level of payments appropriately;
je trdno prepričan, da je za izboljšanje kakovosti upravljanja in nadzora sredstev EU s strani držav članic potrebna ocena prednosti in slabosti sistemov upravljanja in nadzora vsake države članice na posameznih področjih politik; nadalje meni, da je za povečanje učinkovitosti in uspešnosti sredstev EU potrebno boljše upravljanje, manj birokracije in boljši, ne večji, nadzor, tudi glede na njihovo stopnjo absorpcije; v zvezi s tem meni, da je treba vzpostaviti ravnovesje med ravnjo nadzora in zadevnimi stroški;
Strongly believes that an assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of each Member States' management and control systems in individual policy areas is necessary in order to improve the quality of Member States' management and control of EU funds; further believes that better management, less bureaucracy and more transparency, as well as better, not more, controls are necessary to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of EU funds, also with regard to their absorption rate; considers, in this respect, that a balance needs to be found between the level of control and its cost;
poudarja pomen pravne varnosti in kontinuitete proračuna za uspešno izvajanje večletnih politik in programov; zato meni, da se pravila med programskimi obdobji ne smejo spreminjati brez ustrezne utemeljitve in ocene učinka, saj lahko to povzroči višje prehodne stroške, počasnejše izvajanje in večje tveganje napake;
Underlines the importance of legal certainty and budgetary continuity for the successful implementation of multi-annual policies and programmes; believes, therefore, that rules should not change during programming periods without due justification and adequate impact assessment, as this can result in higher transition costs, slower implementation and increasing risk of error;
poudarja, da je institucionalna zmogljivost eden ključnih elementov za uspešen razvoj, izvajanje in spremljanje politik Unije; zato meni, da bi krepitev institucionalne in upravne zmogljivosti na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni lahko podprla strukturne prilagoditve in prispevala k nemotenemu in uspešnemu črpanju sredstev EU;
Stresses that institutional capacity is one of the key elements for successful development, implementation and monitoring of Union policies; considers, accordingly, that strengthening institutional and administrative capacity at national, regional and local level could underpin structural adjustments and contribute to smooth and successful absorption of EU resources;
Del III: Politične prednostne naloge
Part III: Political priorities
opozarja, da začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe krepi politike Unije in Uniji daje pomembna nova pooblastila, zlasti na področjih zunanjega delovanja, športa, vesolja, podnebnih sprememb, energije, turizma in civilne zaščite; poudarja, da so za to potrebna zadostna finančna sredstva; v zvezi s tem opozarja na člen 311 PDEU, ki zahteva od Unije, da si zagotovi potrebna sredstva za doseganje svojih ciljev in izvajanje svojih politik;
Recalls that the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon strengthens Union policies and gives the Union significant new prerogatives, notably in the fields of external action, sport, space, climate change, energy, tourism, and civil protection; stresses that this requires sufficient financial resources; recalls in this context Article 311 TFEU which requires the Union to provide itself with the means necessary to attain its objectives and carry out its policies;
meni, da bi strategija Evropa 2020 morala biti glavna referenca politik za naslednji večletni finančni okvir; obenem vztraja, da strategija Evropa 2020 ni vseobsegajoča strategija, ki bi pokrivala vsa področja politik Unije; poudarja, da mora naslednji večletni finančni okvir ustrezno odražati na Pogodbah temelječe politike, ki zasledujejo druge cilje;
Believes that the Europe 2020 strategy should be the main policy reference for the next MFF; maintains, at the same time, that Europe 2020 is not an all-inclusive strategy covering all Union policy fields; stresses that other Treaty-based policies pursuing different objectives need to be duly reflected in the next MFF;
meni, da bi morala strategija Evropa 2020 pomagati Evropi, da si opomore po krizi in iz nje izide močnejša z izboljšanjem razmer – in odhodkov – za inovacije, raziskave in razvoj, doseganjem ciljev EU na področju podnebnih sprememb in energije, izboljšanjem ravni izobrazbe ter spodbujanjem socialne vključenosti, zlasti z zmanjševanjem revščine; ugotavlja, da strategija Evropa 2020 ni namenjena le obravnavi kratkoročne gospodarske rasti in finančne stabilnosti, ampak tudi dolgoročnega strukturnega preoblikovanja za bolj trajnostno pot rasti, ki temelji na učinkovitejši rabi virov;
Takes the view that the Europe 2020 strategy should help the EU recover from the crisis and come out stronger by improving the conditions for - and expenditure on- innovation, research and development, meeting the EU's climate change and energy objectives, improving education levels and promoting social inclusion, in particular through reduction of poverty; notes that Europe 2020 is intended to address not only short term economic growth and financial stability, but longer term structural transformation to a more sustainable growth path based on more efficient use of resources;
meni, da je obstoječa vsebina strategije Evropa 2020, kot so krovni cilji, vodilne pobude, ovire in kazalniki, še vedno zelo splošna, in poziva Komisijo, naj predloži podrobnejše predloge; poleg tega meni, da je ponovni zagon enotnega trga bistven element strategije EU 2020, saj krepi sinergijo med njenimi različnimi vodilnimi pobudami; poudarja, da je cilje strategije mogoče uresničiti le s konkretnimi zavezami držav članic v njihovih programih nacionalnih reform, s politikami s preverjenimi mehanizmi za izvajanje ter s konkretnimi in skladnimi zakonodajnimi predlogi;
Considers that the current content of the Europe 2020 strategy, such as the headline targets, flagship proposals, bottlenecks and indicators remain of a very general nature and calls on the Commission to submit more detailed proposals; considers, furthermore, that the re-launch of the single market is an essential element of the Europe 2020 strategy which increases the synergy between its various flagship initiatives; underlines that the objectives of the strategy can only be achieved through concrete commitments from Member States in their National Reform Programmes, policies with proven delivery mechanisms and concrete and consistent legislative proposals;
poleg tega poudarja, da je strategija Evropa 2020 lahko verodostojna le, če se zagotovi usklajenost med njenimi cilji in financiranjem, ki je namenjeno tem ciljem na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni; meni, da bi moral naslednji večletni finančni okvir odražati ambicije strategije Evropa 2020, in je odločen delati s Komisijo in državami članicami, da se pripravi verodostojen okvir financiranja, ki bo zlasti zagotavljal ustrezno financiranje vodilnih pobud in krovnih ciljev; v zvezi s tem trdi, da morajo biti naloge, sredstva in odgovornosti jasno opredeljeni in dobro usklajeni med Unijo in njenimi državami članicami, vključno z lokalnimi in regionalnimi organi; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni proračunsko razsežnost vodilnih pobud, saj ti prednostni akcijski načrti zadevajo vse politike, ki se financirajo iz proračuna EU;
Stresses, moreover, that the Europe 2020 strategy can only be credible if consistency is ensured between its objectives and the funding allocated to them at EU and national level; takes the view that the next MFF should reflect the ambitions of the Europe 2020 strategy and is determined to work with the Commission and the Member States to produce a credible funding framework ensuring, in particular, adequate funding for its flagship initiatives and headline targets; argues, in this respect, that tasks, resources, and responsibilities must be clearly defined and well orchestrated between the Union and its Member States, including local and regional authorities; calls on the Commission to clarify the budgetary dimension of the flagship initiatives as these priority action plans cut across all policies funded through the EU budget;
opozarja, da razvoj desetletne strategije Evropa 2020 zahteva zadostno prilagodljivost proračuna, da zagotovi možnost usklajevanja proračunskih sredstev z razvojem okoliščin in prednostnih nalog;
Warns that the development of a ten-year Europe 2020 strategy requires sufficient budgetary flexibility to ensure that budgetary means can be appropriately aligned with evolving circumstances and priorities;
Proračun, ki podpira gospodarsko upravljanje
A budget supporting economic governance
izpostavlja, da je v okviru obstoječega evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo treba z rezervo med zgornjo mejo lastnih sredstev in načrtovanimi letnimi odhodki zagotoviti do 60 milijard EUR garancij za posojila; opozarja na dodatne obveznosti, dogovorjene v kontekstu srednjeročne finančne pomoči državam članicam, ki niso v euroobmočju, ki jih je treba pokriti z isto rezervo;
Highlights the fact that under the current European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism up to EUR 60 billion of loan guarantees must be covered by the margin between the own resources ceiling and the annual budgeted expenditure; points to the additional obligations agreed in the context of the medium-term financial assistance to non-Eurozone Member States, which have to be covered by the same margin;
poziva, naj evropski semester zagotovi boljše proračunsko usklajevanje in sinergije med Unijo in državami članicami, s čimer se bo povečala evropska dodana vrednost; poziva, naj evropski semester tudi poveča gospodarsko usklajevanje med državami članicami v skladu z načelom metode Skupnosti in zagotovi izboljšano gospodarsko upravljanje v euroobmočju in državah članicah, ki se mu želijo pridružiti, s čimer se bo zmanjšala potreba po uporabi mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo; meni, da se mora evropski semester osredotočiti na izboljšanje sinergije med evropskimi in nacionalnimi javnimi naložbami;
Calls for the European semester to provide for improved budgetary coordination and synergies between the Union and the Member States, thus increasing EAV; calls for the European semester to also increase economic coordination among Member States in accordance with the Community method principle and to provide improved economic governance to the Eurozone and to the Member States wishing to join, thus reducing the need to make use of the Financial Stabilisation Mechanism; believes that the European semester should focus on improving synergies between European and national public investments;
ugotavlja, da je bil evropski mehanizem za stabilnost po letu 2013 organiziran v povsem medvladni obliki; je zaskrbljen zaradi tega dogajanja in poudarja pomanjkanje demokratičnega nadzora, odgovornosti in izvrševanja medvladnega pristopa; poudarja nujnost upoštevanja metode Skupnosti za evropski mehanizem za stabilnost; opozarja, da proračun EU nudi garancije za posojila državam članicam v okviru evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo, in zagotavlja srednjeročno finančno pomoč za plačilne bilance državam članicam, ki niso članice euroobmočja;
Notes that the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) after 2013 has been organised in a purely intergovernmental manner; expresses its concern about this development and underlines the lack of democratic control, accountability, as well as the enforcement of the intergovernmental approach; stresses the necessity of taking the Community method into account for the ESM; reminds that the EU budget provides guarantees for loans to Member States under the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism, as well as the mid-term financial assistance for non-Euro area Member States' balances of payments facility;