natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav pogodbenic Regionalne konvencije o pan-evro-mediteranskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu ter predsednikom parlamentarne skupščine Unije za Sredozemlje.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the parties to the Regional Convention on Pan-Euro Mediterranean Preferential Rules of Origin and the Presidents of the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. februarja 2012 o prihodnosti programa Globalno spremljanje okolja in varnosti (GMES) ( 2012/2509(RSP) )
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the future of GMES ( 2012/2509(RSP) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 30. novembra 2011 o evropskem programu za spremljanje Zemlje (GMES) in njegovih dejavnostih (od leta 2014 naprej) ( COM(2011)0831 ),
having regard to the Commission's communication of 30 November 2011 on the European Earth Monitoring Programme (GMES) and its operations (from 2014 onwards) ( COM(2011)0831 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 29. junija 2011 z naslovom „Proračun za strategijo Evropa 2020“ ( COM(2011)0500 ),
having regard to the Commission's communication of 29 June 2011,‘A Budget for Europe 2020’ ( COM(2011)0500 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. januarja 2012 o vesoljski strategiji Evropske unije, ki koristi državljanom Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2012)0013 .
having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2012 on a space strategy for the European Union that benefits its citizens Texts adopted, P7_TA(2012)0013 .
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 31. maja 2011 z naslovom „Za vesoljsko strategijo Evropske unije, ki koristi državljanom“,
having regard to the Council Conclusions of 31 May 2011 entitled ‘Towards a space strategy for the European Union that benefits its citizens’,
ob upoštevanju vprašanja za ustni odgovor Komisiji z dne 13. februarja 2012 o prihodnosti GMES ( O-000025/2012 – B7-0037/2012 ),
having regard to the oral question of 13 February 2012 to the Commission on the future of GMES ( O-000025/2012 – B7-0037/2012 ),
ker je program Globalno spremljanje okolja in varnosti (GMES) ena od dveh vodilnih pobud Unije, ki ima ključno vlogo pri opazovanju Zemlje, nepogrešljivemu orodju na področju boja proti podnebnim spremembam in propadanju okolja, civilne zaščite in varnosti, trajnostnega razvoja, mobilnosti in obvladovanja kriz, ki gospodarstvu ponuja pomembne priložnosti, saj omogoča razvoj storitev za uporabnike in spodbujanje inovacij;
whereas the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) programme is one of the European Union's two flagship space initiatives and plays a key role in earth observation, which is a vital tool in combating climate change and environmental degradation, in civil protection and security, sustainable development, mobility and crisis management, and in offering important economic opportunities by developing downstream services and fostering innovation;
ker je GMES zelo pomemben za Evropo s političnega, strateškega in tehničnega vidika in ker ponuja znatno donosnost naložbe v obliki ekonomskih, socialnih in tehnoloških koristi;
whereas GMES is politically, strategically and technically of major importance for Europe and offers very substantial value for money in terms of economic, social and technological benefits;
ker je bil GMES vzpostavljen kot program Unije, ki je financiran iz proračuna EU, iz katerega bo do leta 2013 prejel skupno približno 3,2 milijarde EUR, poteka pa pod vodstvom EU, ki je zanj odgovorna;
whereas GMES has been set up as a Union programme, financed through the EU budget, totalling approximately EUR 3 2 billion up to 2013, under the management and responsibility of the EU;
ker bi pomanjkanje verodostojnega finančnega načrta za zagotavljanje dolgoročnega in stabilnega financiranja utegnilo v dolgem roku privesti do višjih stroškov, razlik pri dostopu do informacij, ki izhajajo iz programa, in koristih za evropske državljane, prekinitve ali celo opustitve programa in zagotavljanja podatkov, nazadnje pa bi to lahko pomenilo, da je bilo dosedanje vlaganje v program brez koristi in da bo Evropa v okviru te pomembne vesoljske infrastrukture izgubila samostojnost in možnosti za tehnološki napredek;
whereas lack of a credible financing plan providing long-term and stable financial support would probably lead to higher costs in the longer term, disparity of access to resulting information and benefits for European citizens, and an interruption or even a suspension of the programme and its data provision, and could ultimately mean that the investment made to date has been fruitless and that Europe would lose its independence and technological advancement in this important space infrastructure;
ker je Svet 31. maja 2011 zahteval, da se program GMES skladno z odgovornostjo Unije še naprej financira iz proračuna EU, več držav članic pa je že naznanilo nasprotovanje temu, da bi financiranje GMES urejal medvladni sporazum; ker se zaradi tega v predlaganem skladu za GMES najbrž ne bodo zbrala potrebna sredstva;
whereas the Council requested on 31 May 2011 that the EU budget continue to fund the GMES programme in line with Union responsibilities, whereas several Member States have already indicated their objection to the funding of GMES being regulated by an intergovernmental agreement, and whereas the proposed GMES Fund will therefore probably not generate the necessary financing;
obžaluje, ker je Komisija 30. novembra 2011 objavila le sporočilo, namesto da bi predložila zakonodajni predlog o GMES, saj veljavna Uredba (EU) št. 911/2010 zajema le začetne dejavnosti, leta 2013 pa preneha veljati;
Regrets the fact that on 30 November 2011 the Commission published only a communication and did not come forward with a legislative proposal on GMES, given that the current Regulation (EU) No 911/2010 covers only initial operations and will expire by the end of 2013;
ne soglaša z usmeritvijo, ki jo je Komisija nakazala v sporočilu glede prihodnjega financiranja in upravljanja GMES, in sicer da je cilj medvladno financiranje projekta; je zaskrbljen, ker bo ta usmeritev zelo negativno vplivala na prihodnji razvoj programa, ki bo zaradi nje izgubil evropsko razsežnost, neskladna pa bo tudi z načeli preglednosti in polnega, odprtega in enakega dostopa za vse ter morebiti razumljena kot znak, da se EU odpoveduje tej vodilni pobudi;
Disagrees with the direction that the Commission indicated in its communication as regards the future financing and government of GMES, the aim being intergovernmental funding of the project; is concerned that this direction will be hugely detrimental to the future development of the programme, cause the programme to lose its European dimension, contradict the principles of transparency and full, open and equal access for all, and be seen as a sign of disengagement by the EU from this flagship initiative;
ne verjame, da je financiranje GMES izvedljivo zunaj večletnega finančnega okvira – s strukturo financiranja in upravljanja, ki jo je Komisija predlagala v sporočilu;
Does not believe that financing GMES outside the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) – with the funding and governance structure that the Commission proposed in its communication – is a viable option;
poudarja, da negotovost glede prihodnosti programa GMES in njegovega financiranja zelo negativno vpliva na razvoj in sprejem storitev in aplikacij GMES na trgu, te naj bi namreč ustvarjale gospodarsko rast in blaginjo za evropske državljane;
Points out that uncertainty about the future of the GMES programme and its financing is hugely detrimental to the development and market uptake of GMES services and applications, which are expected to generate economic growth and wellbeing for European citizens;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj hitro vloži zakonodajni predlog za dolgoročno upravljanje, financiranje in delovanje programa GMES, ki naj bo financiran znotraj večletnega finančnega okvira, s čimer bi zagotovili ustrezno uvajanje in delovanje programa ter uresničili cilj, da bi ta začel polno delovati z letom 2014;
Calls, therefore, on the Commission to speedily table a legislative proposal for the long-term governance, funding and operation of the GMES programme, financed under the MFF, with the aim of securing the proper deployment and operation of the programme and achieving its objective of being fully operational as from 2014;
B7-0075 , 0076 , 0078 , 0080 , 0081 in 0083/2012
B7-0075 , 0076 , 0078 , 0080 , 0081 and 0083/2012
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. februarja 2012 o smrtni kazni v Belorusiji, zlasti primeru Dimitrija Kanavalava in Vladislava Kavaljova ( 2012/2539(RSP) )
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2012 on the death penalty in Belarus, in particular the cases of Dzmitry Kanavalau and Uladzislau Kavalyou ( 2012/2539(RSP) )
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. decembra 2009 o Belorusiji UL C 286 E, 22.10.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 17 December 2009 on Belarus OJ C 286 E, 22.10.2010, p.
in svojih drugih resolucij o tej zadevi, zlasti z dne 15. septembra 2011 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0392 .
and to its other resolutions on that subject, in particular those of 15 September 2011 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0392 .
in 20. januarja 2011 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0022 .
and 20 January 2011 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0022 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o svetovnem dnevu boja proti smrtni kazni UL C 371 E, 20.12.2011, str.
having regard to its resolution of 7 October 2010 on the World Day against the Death Penalty OJ C 371 E, 20.12.2011, p.
in svojih prejšnjih resolucij o odpravi smrtne kazni, zlasti resolucije z dne 26. aprila 2007 o pobudi za vsesplošni moratorij za smrtno kazen UL C 74 E, 20.3.2008, str.
and to its previous resolutions on the abolition of the death penalty, in particular that of 26 April 2007 on the initiative for a universal moratorium on the death penalty OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju resolucije generalne skupščine Združenih narodov 65/206 z dne 21. decembra 2010, ki poziva k moratoriju za smrtno kazen, ter svojih prejšnjih resolucij iz leta 2007 in 2008 o smrtni kazni,
having regard to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 65/206 of 21 December 2010 calling for a moratorium on the death penalty, as well as to its previous resolutions of 2007 and 2008 on the death penalty,
ob upoštevanju resolucije parlamentarne skupščine OVSE z dne 6–10. julija 2010 o smrtni kazni,
having regard to the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly resolution of 6-10 July 2010 on the death penalty,
ob upoštevanju resolucije parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope 1857 (2012) z dne 25. januarja 2012 o razmerah v Belorusiji,
having regard to Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1857 (2012) of 25 January 2012 on the situation in Belarus,
ob upoštevanju izjave visoke predstavnice EU Catherine Ashton z dne 1. decembra 2011 o smrtni kazni v Belorusiji,
having regard to the statement of 1 December 2011 by EU High Representative Catherine Ashton on the death sentences in Belarus,
ob upoštevanju izjave predsednika Evropskega parlamenta Martina Schulza z dne 24. januarja 2012, v kateri je obsodil izrek smrtne kazni Dimitriju Kanavalavu in Vladislavu Kavaljovu,
having regard to EP President Martin Schulz's statement of 24 January 2012 condemning the death sentences handed down to Dzmitry Kanavalau and Uladzislau Kavalyou,
ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta EU za zunanje zadeve z dne 23. januarja 2011 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Belorusiji,
having regard to the EU Foreign Affairs Council decision of 23 January 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus,
ob upoštevanju izjave z vrhunskega srečanja vzhodnega partnerstva, ki je 7.–9. maja 2009 potekalo v Pragi, in izjave o razmerah v Belorusiji, sprejete 30. septembra 2011 na vrhunskem srečanju vzhodnega partnerstva v Varšavi,
having regard to the Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit adopted in Prague on 7-9 May 2009 and the Declaration on the situation in Belarus adopted on the occasion of the Eastern Partnership Summit in Warsaw on 30 September 2011,
ker je Belorusija edina država v Evropi, ki pozna smrtno kazen in še vedno izvaja usmrtitve;
whereas Belarus remains the only country in Europe that exercises the death penalty and still carries out executions;
ker so julija 2011 usmrtili Aleha Hriškavcova in Andreja Budiko, čeprav odbor ZN za človekove pravice še ni zaključil obravnave njunega primera, in ker so po poročanju borcev za človekove pravice v Belorusiji od leta 1991 usmrtili okoli 400 ljudi;
whereas in July 2011 Aleh Hryshkautsou and Andrei Burdyka were executed when their cases were still pending before the UN Human Rights Committee and whereas, according to human right activists, around 400 people have been executed in Belarus since 1991;
ker je vrhovno sodišče Republike Belorusije smrtno kazen nazadnje izreklo 30. novembra 2011 Dimitriju Kanavalavu in Vladislavu Kavaljovu za domnevne teroristične napade v Vitebsku leta 2005, v Minsku leta 2008 in na podzemni železnici v Minsku aprila 2011;
whereas the most recent death sentences were handed down on 30 November 2011 against Dzmitry Kanavalau and Uladzislau Kavalyou by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus for allegedly committing terrorist attacks in 2005 in Vitebsk, in 2008 in Minsk, and in the Minsk metro in April 2011;
ker po verodostojnih poročilih (Mednarodne federacije za človekove pravice (FIDH) in organizacije Human Rights Watch) marsikaj kaže na to, da sta tožilstvo in belorusko vrhovno sodišče vodila nepošteno sojenje in da so preiskavo zaznamovale številne kršitve človekovih pravic ter namerno neupoštevanje pomembnih dokazov o nedolžnosti obeh moških, in ker je po izjavah opazovalcev sojenja med predhodno preiskavo in sodno obravnavo zadeve prišlo do resnih kršitev postopka;
whereas, according to credible reports (FIDH, Human Rights Watch), there are arguments showing that prosecutors and the Belarus Supreme Court held an unfair trial and that the investigation was marred by serious human rights abuses and intentional disregard of important evidence indicating the innocence of the two men and whereas, according to observers of the trial, there were serious procedural violations during the preliminary investigation and the judicial examination of the case;
ker so Dimitriju Kanavalavu in Vladislavu Kavaljovu onemogočili dostop do odvetnika; ker je iz zanesljivih virov razvidno, da so med zaslišanjem za pridobitev priznanja uporabili mučenje; ker ni forenzičnih dokazov, ki bi katerega od teh dveh moških povezali z eksplozijo, in ker na njiju ali na njunih oblačilih niso našli sledov o eksplozivu;
whereas Dzmitry Kanavalau and Uladzislau Kavalyou were denied access to lawyers, whereas credible reports indicate the use of torture in order to extract confessions during interrogations, whereas there is no forensic evidence linking either of the men to the explosion, and whereas no traces of explosive material were found on the clothes or bodies of the men;
ker so bili vsi pomembni dokazi, ki jih je tožilstvo predložilo med sojenjem, uničeni takoj po izreku sodbe vrhovnega sodišča;
whereas all the important evidence that the prosecution referred to during the trial was destroyed immediately after the Supreme Court announced its decision;
ker ima v skladu z oddelkom 1 člena 14 Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, ki ga je Republika Belorusija ratificirala, vsakdo pravico do pravične in javne obravnave pred pristojnim, neodvisnim in nepristranskim sodiščem;
whereas, under Article 14, Section 1, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ratified by the Republic of Belarus, ‘everyone has the right to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal’;
ker so tajne službe ustrahovale in nadzirale starše Dimitrija Kanavalava in so bili pred njihovim domom redno nastanjeni agenti v civilnih oblačilih, tako da družinski člani več mesecev niso imeli možnosti, da bi komunicirali z zunanjim svetom;
whereas Mr Kanavalau's parents have been intimidated and put under surveillance by secret service officers, and men in plain clothes have been permanently stationed near their home, so that the family has for months been deprived of the opportunity to communicate with the outer world;
ker je smrtna kazen v Belorusiji še vedno državna skrivnost in ker v skladu z beloruskim zakonom o izvrševanju kazenskih sankcij zaporniki, njihovi družinski člani in javnost ne poznajo datuma usmrtitve; ker se smrtna kazen izvede na samem, z ustrelitvijo, in sorodniki ne prejmejo trupla usmrčenega, da bi ga lahko pokopali, pa tudi ne izvedo, kje je pokopan;
whereas the death penalty still remains a ‘state secret’ in Belarus and, according to the Belarusian Criminal Executive Code, the dates of the executions are unknown to death row inmates, the families of the convicted and the public; whereas the death penalty is carried out in private by shooting, the body of an executed person is not given for burial to his or her relatives, and the place of burial is not communicated;
ker je možno, da bodo Dimitrija Kanavalava in Vladislava Kavaljova kmalu usmrtili;
whereas the executions of Mr Kanavalau and Mr Kavalyou may be carried out very soon;
ker je sodba vrhovnega sodišča dokončna in se nanjo ni mogoče pritožiti; ker lahko po beloruskem zakonu prošnjo za pomilostitev preuči predsednik države; ker je Vladislav Kavaljov Aleksandra Lukašenka prosil za pomilostitev, umik vseh obtožb in oprostitev kazenske odgovornosti, vendar doslej še ni prejel odgovora;
whereas the decision of the Supreme Court on the case is final, without appeal; whereas under Belarusian law a petition for mercy can be considered by the president of the country; whereas Uladzislau Kavalyou has asked Alyaksandr Lukashenka for pardon, denying all the charges and demanding to be released from criminal responsibility, but has received no response so far;
ker so beloruske oblasti podpisale praško izjavo z vrhunskega srečanja vzhodnega partnerstva, v kateri so se zavezale k spoštovanju načel mednarodnega prava in temeljnih vrednot, vključno z demokracijo, pravno državo, človekovimi pravicami in temeljnimi svoboščinami;
whereas the Belarusian authorities have signed the Prague Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit, in which they committed themselves to ‘the principles of international law and to fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law and the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms’;
ponovno poudarja, da so Evropska unija in druge mednarodne institucije beloruske oblasti večkrat pozvale k odpravi smrtne kazni;
Reiterates that the European Union and other international institutions have repeatedly urged the Belarusian authorities to abolish the death penalty;
poudarja, da je ta nepopravljiva, kruta, nečloveška in ponižujoča kazen, ki krši pravico do življenja, nesprejemljiva; obžaluje, da beloruske oblasti še vedno niso sprejele konkretnih ukrepov za odpravo smrtne kazni ali za takojšnjo uvedbo moratorija zanjo;
Underlines the fact that this irreversible, cruel, inhumane and degrading punishment, which violates the right to life, is unacceptable; deplores the continuing failure of the Belarusian authorities to take any tangible steps towards abolition of the death penalty or the immediate introduction of a moratorium on it;
obsoja smrtno kazen, ki je bila izrečena Dimitriju Kanavalavu in Vladislavu Kavaljovu, ter Aleksandra Lukašenka poziva, naj ju pomilosti ter uvede moratorij na smrtno kazen in usmrtitve, da bi odpravili smrtno kazen in kazenskega sistema, in sicer z ratifikacijo drugega fakultativnega protokola k Mednarodnemu paktu o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi;
Condemns the death sentences handed down to Mr Kavalyou and Mr Kanavalau and urges Alyaksandr Lukashenka to pardon both men and establish moratorium on all death sentences and executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty from the penal system by ratifying the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in compliance with international standards;
poziva pristojne beloruske oblasti, naj v celoti, pravično in nepristransko raziščejo obtožbe, podane v tem kontekstu, in naj žrtvam grozljivih terorističnih dejanj zagotovijo pravo pravico;
Calls on the competent authorities in Belarus to carry out a full, fair and impartial investigation of the allegations made in this context and to provide true justice for the victims of the heinous acts of terrorism in question;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj v prizadevanjih za odpravo smrtne kazni v Belorusiji uporabita vsa razpoložljiva orodja diplomacije in pomoč v obliki sodelovanja;
Urges the Council and the Commission to use all available tools of diplomacy and cooperation assistance to work towards the abolition of the death penalty in Belarus;
poziva države vzhodnega partnerstva in Rusijo, naj Belorusiji odločno priporočijo, da uvede moratorij za smrtno kazen;
Calls on the Eastern Partnership countries and Russia to urge Belarus to introduce a moratorium on the death penalty;
močno spodbuja civilno družbo in nevladne organizacije v Belorusiji, naj si prizadevajo za odpravo smrtne kazni;
Strongly encourages Belarusian civil society and non-governmental organisations to work on the abolition of the death penalty;
poziva beloruske oblasti, naj nadaljujejo delo parlamentarne delovne skupine za smrtno kazen, ki je začela delovati leta 2010, da bi uskladile domačo zakonodajo z obveznostmi, ki jih ima država na podlagi mednarodnih pogodb o človekovih pravicah, in zagotovile dosledno spoštovanje mednarodno priznanih standardov poštenega sojenja;
Calls on the Belarusian authorities to resume the work of the parliamentary working group on the death penalty started in 2010, to bring domestic legislation into line with the country's obligations under international human rights treaties and to ensure that the internationally recognised standards for fair trials are rigorously respected;
spodbuja beloruske oblasti, naj podpirajo vlogo sodstva in njegove dejavnosti v Belorusiji brez vmešavanja ali pritiskov izvršilne veje oblasti, naj izvajajo priporočila posebnega poročevalca Združenih narodov o neodvisnosti sodnikov in odvetnikov, naj zagotovijo ustrezno javno prepoznavnost sodnih postopkov in naj se uskladijo z obveznostmi v okviru človeške razsežnosti OVSE, zlasti na področju pravne države;
Encourages the Belarusian authorities to promote the role of the judiciary in Belarus and its activity without interference or pressure from the executive, to implement the recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, to ensure appropriate publicity for the judicial process, and to conform with the OSCE Human Dimension commitments, particularly in the field of the rule of law;
obsoja nenehno preganjanje zagovornikov človekovih pravic in pripadnikov demokratične opozicije ter nadlegovanje aktivistov civilne družbe in neodvisnih medijev v Belorusiji iz političnih razlogov; zahteva takojšnjo izpustitev vseh posameznikov, obsojenih zaradi političnih razlogov, ki so bodisi zaprti bodisi prestajajo drugačne oblike kaznovanja, tudi Alesa Bjaljackega, vodjo centra za človekove pravice Vjasna in podpredsednika Mednarodne federacije za človekove pravice (FIDH);
Condemns the continuous persecution of human rights defenders and members of the democratic opposition and the harassment of civil society activists and the independent media in Belarus for political reasons; demands the immediate release of all individuals convicted for political reasons who are imprisoned or undergoing other forms of punishment, including Ales Bialiatski, Chair of the Human Rights Centre ‘Viasna’ and Vice-President of FIDH;