natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da nezadostno znanje jezikov (še posebej pri odraslih) ostaja pomembna ovira za mobilnost delovne sile ter ima lahko za posledico povečan obseg dela na črno; poziva države članice, naj dejavno spodbujajo učenje tujih jezikov in razširijo v vse vrste izobraževanja, in Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s svojimi prizadevanji na tem področju;
Takes the view that an insufficient knowledge of languages (in particular in the case of adults) remains an important obstacle for labour mobility and could lead to increased undeclared work; calls on the Member States to actively promote foreign language teaching and expand it in all categories of schools and on the Commission to pursue its efforts in this area;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o postopku medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah ( 2011/2085(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 October 2011 on the Mutual Evaluation Process of the Services Directive ( 2011/2085(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Boljšemu delovanju enotnega trga za storitve naproti – uporaba rezultatov postopka medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah“ ( KOM(2011)0020 ) in delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije ( SEK(2011)0102 ), priloženega temu sporočilu, o postopku medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah,
having regard to the Commission Communication on ‘Towards a better functioning Single Market for services – building on the results of the mutual evaluation process of the Services Directive’ ( COM(2011)0020 ) and the accompanying Commission staff working document ‘On the process of mutual evaluation of the Services Directive’ ( SEC(2011)0102 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 10. marca 2011 o boljšem delovanju enotnega trga za storitve – postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah,
having regard to the Council Conclusions of 10 March 2011 on a better functioning Single Market for services – mutual evaluation process of the Services Directive,
ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2011 o upravljanju in partnerstvu na enotnem trgu Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0144 .
having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2011 on Governance and Partnership in the Single Market Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0144 .
ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 15. februarja 2011 o izvajanju Direktive o storitvah 2006/123/ES Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0051 .
having regard to its resolution of 15 February 2011 on implementation of the Services Directive 2006/123/EC Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0051 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenje Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A7-0324/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs( A7-0324/2011 ),
ker storitve še vedno obsegajo zgolj približno petino skupne trgovine znotraj EU, hkrati pa ustvarjajo več kot dve tretjini BDP in zaposlitev,
whereas services still represent only around one-fifth of total intra-EU trade while accounting for over two thirds of the EU GDP and employment,
ker dejavnosti, ki jih zajema direktiva o storitvah, ustvarjajo 40 % BDP in delovnih mest v EU in ker predstavljajo tudi nekatere najpomembnejše neizkoriščene možnosti za gospodarsko rast in ustvarjanje delovnih mest v EU, saj na notranjem trgu še vedno obstaja veliko ovir za trgovino s storitvami,
whereas activities covered by the Services Directive account for 40% of EU GDP and jobs, but whereas these activities also represent some of the most important untapped potential for economic growth and job creation in the EU, since many obstacles to trade in services still exist in the Internal Market,
ker storitve spodbujajo gospodarstva držav članic z ustvarjanjem delovnih mest, rastjo in inovacijami in je zato dobro delujoč in povezan notranji trg storitev zaradi sedanje gospodarske in finančne krize ter kot pogoj za okrevanje toliko bolj potreben,
whereas services drive the economies of the Member States by creating jobs, growth and innovation, and whereas a well-functioning and integrated internal market in services is therefore all the more necessary in the light of the current economic and financial crisis and as a condition for recovery;
ker je direktiva o storitvah dejavnik rasti Evropske unije in ker je njeno celovito in pravilno izvajanje vključeno v okvir strategije Evropa 2020 ter Akta za enotni trg,
whereas the Services Directive is a lever for the growth of the European Union and whereas its full and correct implementation is included in the framework of the Europe 2020 strategy and the Single Market Act,
ker pravočasen in pravilen prenos direktive o storitvah v nacionalno zakonodajo pomeni izziv za uprave držav članic, vendar je hkrati potreben in tudi trdna osnova za razvoj upravnega sodelovanja med državami članicami,
whereas, while timely and correct transposition of the Services Directive has been a challenge for the Member States' administrations, it is necessary and it is also a strong basis for the development of administrative cooperation between the Member States,
ker je bilo med postopkom preverjanja Evropski komisiji priglašenih skoraj 34 000 zahtevkov,
whereas close to 34 000 requirements have been notified to the European Commission in the context of the screening process,
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije o postopku medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah in poudarja pomen obsežnega dela, ki so ga opravile Komisija in predvsem nacionalne uprave držav članic, vključno z lokalnimi in regionalnimi upravami;
Welcomes the Commission's Communication on the mutual evaluation process of the Services Directive and acknowledges the considerable amount of work accomplished by the Commission and, above all, Member States' national administrations, including local and regional administrations;
poudarja, da je delujoč enotni trg storitev pogoj za spodbujanje rasti, dostojnega zaposlovanja in inovacij v Evropi ter za ohranitev konkurenčne vloge Evrope na svetovnem prizorišču;
Highlights the fact that a functioning Single Market in services is a prerequisite for generating growth, decent employment and innovation in Europe and for maintaining Europe's competitive role on the world stage;
ugotavlja, da splošni potencial skupnega trga za storitve ni v celoti izkoriščen, ker zlasti zaradi tržnih omejitev v državah članicah le majhen delež malih in srednjih podjetij opravlja čezmejne storitve;
Notes that the overall potential of the common market in services has not been fully exploited, since owing in particular to market restrictions in the Member States only a small proportion of SMEs are providing cross-border services;
meni, da sta za oblikovanje enotnega trga storitev najpomembnejša popolno izvajanje direktive o storitvah v vseh državah članicah ter vzpostavitev povsem delujočih enotnih kontaktnih točk;
Considers that the first priority for the creation of a Single Market in Services is the full and complete implementation of the Services Directive in all Member States and setting up fully operational Points of Single Contact;
zato poziva, naj se preuči, ali je mogoče na enotnih kontaktnih točkah obveščati v angleščini in lokalnih jezikih, kar bi bilo v korist ponudnikov storitev in njihovih uporabnikov iz drugih držav članic, ter ali bi lahko ponudniki in uporabniki storitev uporabljali elektronski podpis;
Calls therefore for consideration to be given to supplying the information at the Points of Single Contact in English as well as in the local language for the benefit of service providers and service users from other Member States, and whether an electronic signature could be used by service providers and users;
opozarja na nedorečenost člena 39 direktive o storitvah pri določitvi natančnih ciljev postopka medsebojnega ocenjevanja; opozarja na različna dojemanja in pričakovanja deležnikov v zvezi z njegovimi cilji in rezultati;
Notes the vagueness of article 39 of the Services Directive in establishing the precise objectives of the mutual evaluation process; notes that different perceptions and expectations existed among stakeholders as regards to its purposes and results;
poudarja, da je bilo medsebojno ocenjevanje izvedeno po roku za prenos določb direktive o storitvah v nacionalno zakonodajo; poudarja, da izvajanja direktive o storitvah ne bi smeli mešati z medsebojnim ocenjevanjem;
Points out that the mutual evaluation was organised after the deadline for transposition of the Services Directive provisions; underlines that the implementation of Services Directive should not be confused with the mutual evaluation exercise;
obžaluje zamude pri izvajanju direktive o storitvah v nekaterih državah članicah in meni, da so vplivale na postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja;
Deplores the delays in the implementation of the Services Directive in some Member States and considers that these have had an impact on the process of mutual evaluation;
meni, da je zahteven časovni okvir postopka medsebojnega ocenjevanja pomagal ohraniti zagon po uveljavitvi direktive;
Takes the view that, while the timing of the mutual evaluation process was challenging, it helped to maintain momentum after the implementation of the Directive;
meni, da se je izkazala smotrnost postopka medsebojnega ocenjevanja, saj je prispeval k seznanitvi Komisije in držav članic s preostalimi ovirami in položajem v vsaki državi članici; ugotavlja, da je postopek državam članicam prinesel povratne informacije o izbranih politikah in poenostavil spodbujanje najboljših praks ter povečaj preglednost nad rezultati izvajanja;
Considers that the mutual evaluation process has proved to be a worthwhile exercise in enabling a better understanding of the remaining barriers and the situation in each Member State on the part of the European Commission and the Member States; notes that the process has enabled the Member States to get feedback on their policy choices and facilitated the promotion of best practices and increased transparency of implementation results;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj začnejo dialog o dovoljenih in nedovoljenih ovirah;
Calls on the Member States and the Commission to initiate a dialogue on which barriers are permitted and which are not;
meni, da je bil postopek skupnega ocenjevanja bistven za razjasnitev nekaterih dvoumnih okoliščin, ki še prevladujejo pri opravljanju storitev na nacionalni in čezmejni ravni, kot so vzajemno priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij in zavarovalne obveznosti čezmejnih ponudnikov storitev; poudarja, da je nenazadnje pomagal oceniti, ali se izvedbeni ukrepi, sprejeti v posamezni državi članici, izvajajo v smislu direktive o storitvah;
Takes the view that the mutual evaluation process was key in clarifying certain ambiguous situations still prevalent in the provision of services both at national and cross-border level, such as the mutual recognition of professional qualifications and insurance obligations imposed on cross-border service providers; highlights the fact that ultimately it helped to gauge whether or not the implementation measures adopted in each Member State are carried out according to the spirit of the Services Directive;
poudarja, da so „skupinske razprave“ bistvena sestavina medsebojnega ocenjevanja; pozdravlja duh sodelovanja in medsebojnega zaupanja, ki je prevladoval med razpravami;
Highlights ‘cluster discussions’ as the core element of the mutual evaluation; welcomes the spirit of cooperation and mutual trust which has prevailed during discussions;
meni, da je medsebojno ocenjevanje prispevalo k oblikovanju evropskega duha med nacionalnimi upravami in upravam držav članic omogočil, da se bolje spoznajo; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da se znanje in izkušnje, pridobljeni med medsebojnim ocenjevanjem, ohranjajo in uporabijo za izboljšanje enotnega trga storitev;
Takes the view that the mutual evaluation exercise has contributed to the development of a ‘European spirit’ among national administrations and enabled Member States' administrations to get to know each other better; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the knowledge and experience gained through the mutual evaluation is maintained and used for the improvement of the Single Market in services;
ugotavlja, da so se deležniki v postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja vključevali le v omejenem obsegu; priznava, da je bila neka mera zaupnosti pomemben pogoj za vzpostavitev medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami; vendar obžaluje, da deležniki niso redno dobivali povratnih informacij;
Notes that the involvement of stakeholders in the process of mutual evaluation was limited; acknowledges that a certain degree of confidentiality was an important condition to create a mutual trust between Members States; Nevertheless, regrets that the regular feedback of the process has not been provided to the stakeholders;
se zaveda upravnih stroškov, povezanih z medsebojnim ocenjevanjem, zlasti v državah članicah, kjer so v postopku sodelovale regionalne oblasti;
Is conscious of the administrative costs related to the mutual evaluation, especially in Member States where regional level administration was involved in the process;
meni, da je postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja iz direktive o storitvah pomemben instrument za opredelitev nadaljnjih pobud, ki imajo za cilj izboljšanje delovanja notranjega trga za storitve; pozdravlja dejstvo, da Komisija predlaga niz ukrepov, s katerimi bi izkoristili zagon, pridobljen med izvajanjem in medsebojnim ocenjevanjem;
Takes the view that the mutual evaluation process in the Services Directive is an important instrument for identifying further initiatives aimed at improving the functioning of the internal market in services; welcomes the fact that the Commission is proposing a set of actions to build on the momentum gathered during the implementation and mutual evaluation phases;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament obvešča o napredku in rezultatih dialoga z državami članicami o izvajanju direktive o storitvah; poziva Komisijo, naj po potrebi sprejme dodatne izvršilne ukrepe;
Urges the Commission to keep Parliament informed about the progress and outcomes of the dialogue held with Member States on the implementation of the Services Directive; Calls on the Commission to take further enforcement measures when deemed necessary;
pričakuje napovedano ekonomsko oceno izvajanja direktive o storitvah in njenega vpliva na delovanje trga storitev; si želi, da bi bilo mogoče na osnovi te ocene izmeriti dejanski vpliv direktive na ekonomsko dejavnost in zaposlovanje; poziva Komisijo, naj pri izvajanju te ocene zagotovi čim večjo preglednost in jo poziva, naj svoje ugotovitve predstavi Parlamentu takoj, ko bodo na voljo;
Looks forward to the announced economic assessment of the implementation of the Services Directive and its impact on the functioning of the services market; hopes that this evaluation will make it possible to measure the real impact of the directive on economic activity and employment; calls on the Commission to ensure maximum transparency when carrying out this assessment and invites the Commission to present to Parliament its findings as soon as they are available;
pozdravlja pobudo za preverjanje uspešnosti notranjega trga in upa, da se bo s tem občutno izboljšalo praktično razumevanje uporabe različnih zakonodajnih aktov EU in njihovega vzajemnega delovanja v praksi; meni, da bi bilo treba preverjanje uspešnosti izvesti ob upoštevanju vidika uporabnikov enotnega trga;
Welcomes the internal market performance check initiative and hopes that this exercise will significantly improve the practical understanding of how different pieces of EU legislation are applied and interact on the ground; Considers that the performance check exercise should be performed by taking into account the perspective of the Single Market users;
poziva Komisijo, naj tesno sodeluje z Evropskim parlamentom pri pobudi za preverjanje uspešnosti;
Calls on the Commission to involve the European Parliament closely in the performance check initiative;
poziva ki odpravi regulativnih ovir, ki še obstajajo, kot so pravila o rezerviranih dejavnostih, obveznosti zavarovanja, zahteve glede pravne oblike in lastništva kapitala; poziva Komisijo, naj svojo pozornost usmeri v nepravične in nesorazmerne zahteve, ki jih je treba odpraviti, da bi zagotovili nemoteno delovanje enotnega trga;
Calls for the remaining regulatory barriers, such as the rules on reserved activities, insurance obligations, legal form and capital ownership requirements, to be tackled; calls on the Commission to concentrate its efforts on unjustified or disproportionate requirements which should be abolished in order to guarantee the smooth functioning of the Single Market;
obžaluje, da se na področjih, kjer so težave že dolgo znane, ni že prej ukrepalo;
Deplores the fact that no earlier action had been taken in areas where problems had long been known;
obžaluje, da Komisija še ni zagotovila meril za izbiro posebnih vrst zahtev za ciljne ukrepe; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, zakaj so bile druge vrste zahtev iz člena 15 direktive o storitvah, kot sta najmanjše število zaposlenih in določene najnižje ali najvišje tarife, ocenjene kot manj pomembne od tistih, ki jih je izpostavila v svojem sporočilu;
Regrets that the Commission has not provided criteria for choosing specific types of requirement for targeted actions; calls on the Commission to clarify the reasons why the other types of requirement mentioned in Article 15 of the Services Directive, such as the minimum number of employees and fixed minimum or maximum tariffs, were considered less important than those singled out in its Communication;
poziva Komisijo, naj zbere in predstavi podatke, ki številčno ovrednoti vpliv različnih še obstoječih zahtev, ki bi, če bi bile odpravljene, izboljšale delovanje enotnega trga storitev; poziva Komisijo, naj da prednost ciljnim ukrepom za odpravo tistih zahtev, ki bi ob polnem upoštevanju člena 1 direktive o storitvah prinesle najvišjo dodano vrednost za delovanje enotnega trga storitev; nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj svoje ukrepe osredotoči na sektorje in poklice z velikimi možnostmi rasti pri čezmejnem opravljanju storitev;
Calls on the Commission to collect and present data quantifying the impact of the various remaining requirements which, if removed, would improve the functioning of the Single Market for services; calls on the Commission to prioritise its targeted actions on removing those requirements which would bring the highest level of added value to the functioning of the Single Market in services in full compliance with Article 1 of the Services Directive; calls on the Commission, furthermore, to focus its action on the sectors and professions with a high growth potential for the cross-border provision of services;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z individualnim sodelovanjem z državami članicami in ga še okrepi, da bi se direktiva o storitvah v vseh državah članicah direktiva o storitvah v celoti in pravilno prenesla in izvajala;
Calls on the Commission to continue and step up work with Member States on an individual basis so as to achieve a complete and correct transposition and implementation of the Services Directive in all Member States;
meni, da še vedno obstajajo številne nacionalne ovire, ki upočasnjujejo zlasti rast profesionalnih storitev med podjetji; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo nove in še obstoječe zahteve nediskriminatorne, nujne in sorazmerne; poziva Komisijo, naj aktivneje sodeluje z državami članicami, da bo natančno spremljala in zagotovila potrebno obveščanje o pomembnih nacionalnih zakonodajnih ukrepih v zvezi z izvajanjem člena 15 direktive o storitvah;
Takes the view that many national barriers still remain in place, slowing in particular growth in professional business-to-business services; calls on the Member States to ensure that new and remaining requirements are non-discriminatory, necessary and proportionate; calls on the Commission to engage more actively with Member States to monitor closely and ensure due notification of the relevant national legislative measures relating to implementation of Article 15 of the Services Directive;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj si v večji meri skupaj prizadevajo za ustrezno izvajanje določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev iz člena 16 direktive o storitvah v državah članicah; poziva Komisijo, naj celovito oceni stanje na področju opravljanja čezmejnih storitev v EU, vključno z razlogi, ki pojasnjujejo zmerno stopnjo rasti v tem sektorju, ter podrobno pregleda, kako učinkovito države članice izvajajo določbe člena 16 direktive o storitvah;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to work more closely together to ensure the proper application in Member States of the freedom to provide services clause in Article 16 of the Services Directive; calls on the Commission to undertake a comprehensive assessment of the state of play on the provision of cross-border services in the EU including the reasons explaining the moderate growth rate in this sector, and a detailed overview of the effectiveness of Member State implementation of the provisions of Article 16 of the Services Directive;
poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti skladno izvajanje različnih delov zakonodaje, ki so ključnega pomena za storitvene dejavnosti;
Stresses the need to ensure coherence of the implementation of the different pieces of legislation of central relevance to service activities;
poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo celovito in ustrezno izvajanje določb direktive o storitvah, ki niso bile vključene v postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, kot so enotne kontaktne točke, ter poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi dosledno izvrševanje ustreznih določb;
Urges the Members States to ensure complete and proper implementation of the provisions of the Services Directive which were not included in the mutual evaluation process, such as the Points of Single Contact, and calls on the Commission to ensure strict enforcement of the relevant provisions;
poziva Komisijo, naj pozorno spremlja redno preverjanje in ocenjevanje dela enotnih kontaktnih točk v državah članicah, ki imajo bistveno vlogo pri zagotavljanju informacij ponudnikom storitev na sodoben in potrošniku prijazen način;
Calls on the Commission to pay careful attention to the regular checks and evaluations of the work of the Points of Single Contact in Member States, which play a key role in making necessary information available to service-providers in an up-to-date and user-friendly manner;
ugotavlja, da so pri zagotavljanju, da lahko ponudniki storitev, zlasti mala in srednja podjetja, v celoti uveljavljajo svoje pravice na enotnem trgu, pomembni alternativni mehanizmi za reševanje sporov in problemov, kot je SOLVIT; pozdravlja napoved Komisije, da bo ocenila učinkovitost teh orodij in poročala o potrebi po nadaljnjih specifičnih pobudah.
Notes the important role of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and problem solving tools such as SOLVIT in ensuring that service providers, and in particular SMEs, can fully exploit their Single Market rights; welcomes the Commission's announcement that it will assess the effectiveness of these tools and report on the need for further specific initiatives;
soglaša s stališčem Komisije, da bi bilo treba ponudnikom storitev, vendar tudi njihovim prejemnikom, pomagati pri uveljavljanju njihovih pravic, in predlaga nadgradnjo obstoječih orodij, kot je SOLVIT;
Shares the Commission's view that service providers, but also service recipients, should be helped to enforce their rights, and recommends to build on the existing tools such as SOLVIT;
znova poudarja svojo podporo uporabi medsebojnega ocenjevanja na drugih področjih politike, kjer je to ustrezno; meni, da se je medsebojno ocenjevanje izkazalo za inovativno in koristno ter bi ga morali dojemati kot sredstvo za izboljšanje delovanja enotnega trga;
Reiterates its support for the use of mutual evaluation in other policy areas, where appropriate; believes that mutual evaluation has proven innovative and useful and should be seen as a tool to improve the functioning of the Single Market;