natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi moral odbor za krizno upravljanje Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje zagotoviti enotno krizno načrtovanje v zvezi z morebitnimi kriznimi območji in scenariji, po drugi strani pa tudi s pomočjo krizne platforme praktično vodenje odzivanja na krizo, pri čemer bi moral tako v Bruslju kot na terenu usklajevati uporabo različnih finančnih instrumentov in razpoložljivih zmogljivosti Unije, ne da bi pri tem posegal v specifične postopke odločanja in pravne podlage, ki veljajo za uporabo civilnih in vojaških zmogljivosti v okviru SZVP/SVOP ali za uporabo instrumentov Skupnosti;
Believes that the Crisis Management Board should provide the EEAS with unified contingency planning in relation to potential theatres and crisis scenarios and, secondly, also through a crisis platform for practical crisis response management, working both in Brussels and on the ground to coordinate the use of the various financial instruments and deployment of capabilities available to the EU, without undermining the specific decision-making procedures and legal bases applying to the deployment of civilian and military capabilities under the CFSP/CSDP or to the use of Community instruments;
poudarja potrebo po krepitvi ter po smotrnejši razporeditvi in organizaciji civilnih in vojaških struktur, služb in enot, ki so v okviru Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje in Komisije odgovorne za odzivanje na krizne razmere, še posebej pa:
Points to the need to strengthen the civilian and military crisis response structures, departments and units within the EEAS and the Commission, spreading them out and organising them in a more rational way, and in particular:
poziva h krepitvi enote za operativno načrtovanje civilnih misij znotraj civilne zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij (CPCC);
calls for expansion of the CPCC unit responsible for operational planning of civilian missions;
ponovno poziva, naj se Služba za instrumente zunanje politike, ki je zadolžena za načrtovanje in programiranje ukrepov za odzivanje na krizne razmere v skladu s členom 3 instrumenta za stabilnost, vključi v strukture Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje na področju kriznega upravljanja in izgradnje miru in naj se nekdanja delovna mesta Relex/A2, ki so bila v okviru novih instrumentov zunanje politike dodeljena Enoti 2 (12 mest AD in 5 mest AST), prenesejo na Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje; poudarja, da je takšen prenos pogoj za sprostitev rezerve pod ustrezno postavko proračuna Komisije;
renews its call for the Foreign Policy Instruments Service (FPIS) in charge of planning and programming the Instrument for Stability Article 3 crisis response measures to be integrated into the EEAS crisis management and peacebuilding structures and, specifically, for the former Relex/A2 posts assigned to Unit 2 of the new foreign policy instruments (12 AD and 5 AST) to be transferred to the EEAS; points out that this transfer is a condition which has to be satisfied in order to release the reserve under the corresponding heading in the Commission budget;
podpira vzpostavitev centra skupnih služb za upravljanje nalog SVOP oziroma medinstitucionalnega urada, ki bo zajemal Enoto 3 Komisije (operacije SZVP na področju instrumentov zunanje politike – nekdanja enota Relex/A3) in Enoto za podporo misijam v okviru civilne zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij (CPCC); ugotavlja, da bi nova služba s tem, ko bi prevzela odgovornosti na področju kadrovske politike, logistike, javnih naročil in finančnih virov civilnih misij SVOP in vodje misij razbremenila dela upravnih nalog, zagotavljala večjo učinkovitost tako z združevanjem upravnih funkcij, od izbora in zaposlovanjem osebja do centralizacije javnih naročil in upravljanja opreme;
supports the establishment of a Shared Services Centre for the management of CSDP missions, that is to say, an interinstitutional office comprising the Commission's Unit 3 (CFSP Operations of the Foreign Policy Instruments – formerly Relex/A3) and the CPCC Mission Support Unit; notes that the new Service, by addressing the personnel, logistics, procurement and financial responsibilities of the civilian CSDP missions and by relieving the Heads of Mission from part of their administrative duties, would guarantee greater efficiency both by pooling administrative functions, starting with the selection and recruitment of personnel, and by centralising procurement and equipment management;
obžaluje pičle rezultate, ki jih je obrodil proces civilnega globalnega cilja 2010 na področju civilnih zmogljivosti, in še posebej neskladje med številom osebja, ki so ga države članice imenovale na papirju, in tistim, ki je bilo dejansko na voljo za misije ter skromen napredek na področju usposabljanja človeških virov (ni skupnih standardov, omejeno število programov usposabljanja, ki so bili naloženi na program priložnosti za usposabljanje Schoolmaster v okviru programskega orodja Goalkeeper); poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, Svet in države članice, naj usklajeno pristopijo k ponovni oživitvi razvoja civilnih zmogljivosti, predvsem na področju zaposlovanja, ravnotežja med spoloma, usposabljanja in razmeščanja; zlasti poudarja pomembnost nadaljnjih prizadevanj na podlagi dosežkov EU v okviru dveh civilnih globalnih ciljev, da bi se uspešno soočili s temi nerešenimi izzivi; poziva k vzpostavitvi mehanizma Skupnosti za okrepitev civilnih zmogljivosti, zlasti z usposabljanjem in krepitvijo civilnega dela Evropske akademije za varnost in obrambo;
Regrets the scant results achieved by the Civilian Headline Goal 2010 process regarding civilian capabilities, and in particular the discrepancy between the personnel assigned by Member States on paper and the numbers actually available for missions and the modest progress as regards the training of human resources (no common standards, limited number of training programmes uploaded to the Schoolmaster training opportunities programme within the Goalkeeper software environment); calls on the VP/HR, the Council and the Member States to take coordinated steps to reactivate the development of civilian capabilities, especially where recruitment, gender balance, training and deployment are concerned; in particular, stresses the importance of continuing to build on the heritage of the two Civilian Headline Goals that the EU has pursued so far in order to face these outstanding challenges; calls for the establishment of a Community mechanism for enhancing civilian capabilities, especially training and increasing the civil part of the European Security and Defence College;
ponovno poudarja, da so verodostojne, zanesljive in razpoložljive vojaške zmogljivosti nujen pogoj za avtonomno SVOP in za celostni pristop ter da jih morajo zagotoviti države članice; poleg tega poudarja, da se lahko te vojaške zmogljivosti uporabljajo v različne namene, vključno s civilnimi, v okviru načel, ki določajo delovanje EU na mednarodni ravni, in neodvisne narave pravnega reda EU;
Reaffirms that credible, reliable and available military capabilities are a sine qua non for an autonomous CSDP and a comprehensive approach and that Member States need to provide them; further stresses that those military capabilities can be applied for diverse purposes, not least for civilian ones, in keeping with the principles underlying EU action on the international stage and the self-determined nature of the EU legal order;
obžaluje ostro nasprotje med 200 milijardami EUR, ki jih države članice letno porabijo za obrambo, premajhnimi sredstvi, ki jih ima na voljo EU, ter boleče dolgotrajnimi konferencami za oblikovanje sil za vojaške operacije EU v trenutku, ko se soočamo s prevelikimi kapacitetami in preštevilnim osebjem; obžaluje, da po več kot dvanajstih letih metoda procesa oblikovanja sil še ni prinesla nobenih dejanskih izboljšav v zvezi s količino in kakovostjo vojaških zmogljivosti, ki so na voljo za misije SVOP; poudarja, da je treba redno ocenjevati izboljšave vojaških zmogljivosti; poudarja, da obstaja vse večji razkorak med naraščajočim povpraševanjem iz tujine in med viri, ki jih države članice dajo na voljo Uniji;
Regrets the sharp contrast between the EUR 200 billion per year spent by the Member States on defence, the lack of means at the EU's disposal and the painfully protracted force generation conferences for EU military operations at a time when there are redundant capabilities and personnel; deplores the fact that over more than twelve years the method of the force generation process has not yielded any de facto improvements regarding the quantity and quality of military capabilities available for CSDP missions; stresses the need to evaluate the improvements of military capabilities on a regular basis; points out that there is an increasing mismatch between growing demand from abroad and the resources that Member States make available to the Union;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da lahko trenutni varčevalni ukrepi privedejo do zmanjšanja sredstev, ki na evropski ravni ni usklajeno, in do nadaljnjega podvajanja, ki lahko postavi pod vprašaj tudi samo SZVP, namesto da bi države članice usmerili k smotrnejši porabi sredstev, namenjenih obrambi, pri čemer bi države združile in si delile večji delež obrambnih zmogljivosti, proračuna in zahtev ter tako dosegle večjo varnost za svoje državljane; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo večjo preglednost svojih obrambnih proračunov;
Notes with anxiety that the current economic austerity could lead to cuts that were not concerted at European level and to continuing overlapping that might call the CSDP as such into question, whereas the end effect should be to push the Member States towards smarter defence spending whereby they would pool and share a larger proportion of their defence capabilities, budget and requirements while achieving more security for their citizens; calls on Member States to develop greater transparency regarding their respective defence budgets;
opozarja, da bi morali SZVP in SVOP prispevati tudi k razoroževanju in neširjenju orožja od osebnega in lahkega orožja do jedrskih bojnih konic in balističnih raket; poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj da tej politiki prednost s spodbujanjem novih proaktivnih ukrepov v zvezi s protipehotnimi minami, kasetnim strelivom, strelivom z osiromašenim uranom, osebnim in lahkim orožjem, biološkim, kemičnim in jedrskim orožjem za množično uničevanje ter načini prenosa teh orožij; poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj Evropskemu parlamentu vsako leto poroča o izvajanju pregledne konference o Pogodbi o neširjenju jedrskega orožja leta 2010 in njenega akcijskega načrta za razoroževanje in neširjenje orožja;
Recalls that the CFSP and CSDP, should also lead to disarmament and non-proliferations of weapons ranging from small and light weapons (SALW) to nuclear warheads and ballistic missiles; urges the VP/HR to give this policy priority by promoting a new series of proactive measures addressing the issues of landmines, cluster munitions and depleted uranium ammunition, and small and light weapons, biological, chemical and nuclear weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery; urges the VP/HR to report to the European Parliament about the implementation of the 2010 NPT Review Conference and its action plan on disarmament and non-proliferation on an annual basis;
obžaluje pogosto podvajanje obrambnih programov v EU, kot je na primer več kot 20 programov za oklepna vozila, šest različnih programov za bojne podmornice, pet programov za rakete zrak-zemlja in trije programi za bojna zračna plovila in njihove posledice, kar pomeni, da ekonomije obsega niso dosežene, tratijo se omejena ekonomska sredstva, cene evropske obrambne opreme pa so pretirano visoke, kar poleg tega vodi k nadaljevanju razdrobljenosti evropske obrambne tehnološke in industrijske osnove (EDTIB), ovira konkurenčnost vse z obrambo povezane industrije v Evropi in v tem pogledu neposredno ogroža tehnološki vodilni položaj in delovna mesta;
Deplores the widespread overlapping of defence programmes in the EU, such as the more than 20 armoured vehicle programmes, the 6 different attack submarine programmes, the 5 ground-to-air missile programmes and the 3 combat aircraft programmes, and its consequences, namely that economies of scale are not achieved, limited economic resources are wasted, and the prices of European defence equipment are over-inflated, which moreover leads to continuing fragmentation of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB), hampers the competitiveness of the whole security-related industrial sector in Europe and in this regard directly endangers technological leadership and employment;
ponovno poudarja, da se je treba z vsemi zgornjimi vprašanji soočiti s pomočjo jasne in dolgoročne skupne politične odločnosti, pri čemer je treba v celoti izkoristiti možnosti, ki jih nudi Lizbonska pogodba, ter da mora kakršna koli skupna obrambna politika, katere namen je postopna vzpostavitev skupne obrambe, krepiti sposobnosti EU za odzivanje na krizne razmere in zagotavljati dolgoročno izgradnjo miru, predvsem pa zagotoviti strateško avtonomijo Evrope in njeno zmožnost ukrepanja; poziva k sklicu izrednega zasedanja Evropskega sveta, posvečenega Evropski varnosti in obrambi; znova poziva, naj priprava bele knjige o evropski varnosti in obrambi poteka tako, da bo vključevala vse zadevne zainteresirane strani EU in temeljila na pregledih nacionalnih obrambnih in varnostnih sistemov v vseh državah članicah, ki se izvajajo po istem vzorcu in omogočajo neposredno primerjavo prednosti in slabosti obstoječih zmogljivosti in predpostavk načrtovanja;
Reaffirms that all of the above points should be tackled by means of a clear-cut long-term common political resolve, making full use of the potential offered by the Lisbon Treaty, and that any common defence policy intended to move gradually towards common defence must serve to strengthen the EU's ability to respond to crises and to provide for long-term peace-building, and above all enhance Europe's strategic autonomy and capacity to act; calls for an extraordinary European Council meeting to be given over to European security and defence; renews its call for the drafting of a White Paper on European security and defence, to be set up in a process that includes all relevant EU stakeholders, and to be based on national defence and security reviews in all the Member States which accord with a common template and allow for direct comparability of strengths and weaknesses in current capabilities and planning assumptions;
odločno poziva države članice, naj podprejo Evropsko obrambno agencijo kot strokovno agencijo EU, katere naloga je opredeliti in razvijati obrambne zmogljivosti na področju kriznega upravljanja ter spodbujati in krepiti evropsko sodelovanje na področju oboroževanja;
Strongly calls on Member States to support the European Defence Agency as the expert EU agency entrusted with the role of identifying and developing defence capabilities in the field of crisis management and of promoting and enhancing European armaments cooperation;
ugotavlja, da je francosko-britanski sporazum z dne 2. novembra 2010 o sodelovanju na področju varnosti in obrambe nastal zunaj okvira Pogodbe o Evropski uniji; kljub temu upa, da bo ta najnovejši poskus francosko-britanskega sodelovanja lahko deloval kot katalizator za nadaljnji napredek na evropski ravni, ki bo skladen z institucionalnim okvirom Unije in logičnimi zahtevami po racionalizaciji, interoperabilnosti in stroškovni učinkovitosti; poudarja, da bi Evropska obrambna agencija v tem okviru morala imeti dopolnilno vlogo; meni, da bi moralo sedanje francosko-britansko obrambno sodelovanje zagotoviti načrt za učinkovitejše evropsko obrambno sodelovanje na podlagi načrtovanja zmogljivosti in medsebojne odvisnosti; poziva vladi Francije in Združenega kraljestva, naj se zavežeta nadaljnjim evropskim večstranskim dogovorom o združevanju in skupnem izkoriščanju vojaških zmogljivosti;
Takes note that the Franco-British agreement of 2 November 2010 on security and defence cooperation has been indeed launched outside the framework of the Treaty on European Union; hopes nevertheless that this latest attempt at Franco-British collaboration can act as a catalyst for further progress at European level in line with the Union's institutional framework and the logical requirements of rationalisation, interoperability and cost-effectiveness; underlines that the EDA should play a supportive role in this context; considers that the current Franco-British defence cooperation should provide a roadmap for more effective European defence cooperation based on capability planning and mutual dependency; urges the governments of France and the United Kingdom to commit to future European multilateral pooling and sharing arrangements;
poudarja, da stalno strukturirano sodelovanje, kot ga opredeljuje Pogodba, zagotavlja pravne zaščitne ukrepe in obveznosti, ter je obenem tudi instrument za spodbujanje boljše uporabe sredstev SVOP v časih gospodarske krize in premagovanje pomanjkanja konsenza med državami članicami; poziva Svet in države članice, naj brez odlašanja opredelijo cilje in vsebine takega sodelovanja, ki naj vključuje vse države članice, ki izkažejo politično voljo in vojaško zmogljivost;
Emphasises that the Permanent Structured Cooperation, as laid down in the Treaty, provides legal safeguards and obligations, and is also an instrument to promote better use of CSDP assets in times of economic austerity and to overcome a lack of consensus among Member States; calls on the Council and the Member States to determine the aims and substance of such cooperation without further delay, involving all the Member States which prove themselves to be both politically willing and militarily capable;
meni, da je treba v sestavi Sveta za zunanje zadeve okrepiti vlogo obrambnih ministrov;
Believes that the role of the Defence Ministers needs to be strengthened within the Foreign Affairs Council configuration;
opominja, da je določba o medsebojni pomoči pravna obveza uspešne solidarnosti v primeru zunanjega napada zoper katero koli državo članico, kar ni v navzkrižju z vlogo Nata v evropski varnostni strukturi, hkrati pa se spoštuje nevtralnost nekaterih držav članic; zato priporoča resen razmislek glede resničnega učinka določbe o medsebojni pomoči, pri čemer je treba rešiti tudi odprta vprašanja glede izvedbenih določb, ki so bile umaknjene iz osnutka Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije; poziva k oblikovanju političnih smernic, kar je postalo nujno že zaradi nedavnega prenehanja veljavnosti spremenjene bruseljske pogodbe (ZEU);
Recalls that the clause on mutual assistance represents a legal obligation of effective solidarity in the event of an external attack against any of the Member States, without conflicting with NATO's role in the European security architecture, while at the same time respecting the neutrality of some Member States; recommends, therefore, that serious thought be given to the real impact of the clause on mutual assistance, tackling the unresolved problems regarding the implementing provisions, which were removed from the draft Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; calls for political guidelines to be drawn up, an imperative need which has arisen not least from the recent termination of the modified Treaty of Brussels (WEU);
ugotavlja, da je v procesu razvoja SVOP prišel čas za to, da političnim in institucionalnim dosežkom sledijo konkretni dosežki na področju vojaških zmogljivosti; poudarja, da nudijo določbe, ki jih prinaša Lizbonska pogodba, številne možnosti za spodbujanje razvoja takšnih zmogljivosti in vzpostavitev okvira za postopno oblikovanje obrambne politike EU, ter vztraja, da je učinkovita uporaba omenjenih določb nujna;
Recognises that within the CSDP development process, the time has now come for the political achievement and the institutional achievement to be followed by concrete achievements as regards military capabilities; points out that the provisions introduced by the Lisbon Treaty offer great potential for promoting the development of those capabilities and laying down a progressive framework for the EU's defence policy, and maintains that they need to be put to effective use as a matter of urgency;
priporoča, naj se države članice popolnoma zavežejo k zagotavljanju in vzdržnosti vojaških zmogljivosti ter se tako odzovejo na trende, ki dajejo večji poudarek vidikom kakovosti; podpira zahteve, ki so bile dane na neformalnem zasedanju obrambnih ministrov v Gentu ter predstavljene v nemško-švedskem dokumentu in weimarski pobudi, in poziva k takojšnjemu pričetku izvajanja operativne faze, kot izhaja iz sklepov Sveta, sprejetih decembra 2010, v katerih so se obrambni ministri dogovorili, da bi Evropska obrambna agencija morala okrepiti svoja prizadevanja za lažjo določitev območij, na katerih je mogoče združevanje in skupno izkoriščanje vojaških zmogljivosti, vključno s podporo skupine modrecev; poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti uspešnost tega novega pristopa k razvoju zmogljivosti; poziva države članice, naj spoštujejo rok, ki ga je določil Svet decembra 2010; opozarja, da morajo načelniki štabov oboroženih sil EU do maja 2011 pregledati svoje zmogljivosti, da je vojaški štab EU zadolžen, da na podlagi teh podatkov do sredine leta 2011 pripravi pregled in da bodo ministri za obrambo EU pred koncem leta 2011 sprejeli dokončne zaključke; poziva agencijo, naj tej novi pobudi nameni prednostno vlogo in pripravi seznam morebitnih novih projektov sodelovanja (na primer na področju satelitskih komunikacij, zdravstvene podpore, pomorske logistike in kibernetične varnosti), s čimer bi se izognili podvajanju stroškov in povečali interoperabilnost;
Recommends that Member States commit themselves fully to the provision and sustainability of military capabilities, matching the trend towards growing emphasis on the qualitative aspects; endorses the requests made at the Ghent informal Defence Ministers’ meeting and in the German-Swedish paper and the Weimar initiative and calls for the operative phase to begin without delay, in line with the December 2010 Council conclusions, in which the Defence Ministers agreed that the EDA should intensify its work to facilitate the identification of areas for pooling and sharing military capabilities, including through the support of a team of wise men; stresses the need to make this new approach to capability development a success; calls on the Member States to respect the deadline set by the December 2010 Council; recalls that the Chiefs of Staff of the EU armed forces have been tasked to screen their capabilities by May 2011, that the EU Military Staff has been commissioned to use this data for producing an overview by mid-2011 and that EU Ministers of Defence will reach final conclusions by the end of this year; calls on the Agency to make this new initiative its priority and to list potential new cooperation projects (for instance in areas such as satellite communications, medical support, naval logistics and cyber security) so as to avoid overlapping of costs and increase interoperability;
podpira priporočila Sveta za zunanje zadeve, ki je potekal januarja 2011 in ki podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico poziva k obravnavi vprašanj, predstavljenih v weimarski pobudi, s čimer bi na podlagi poročila, ki ga mora Svetu za zunanje zadeve predstaviti do sredine leta 2011, omogočila sprejem praktičnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi do konca leta v čim večji meri dosegli konkretne rezultate, vključno z možnostjo razširitve tovrstnih pobud na druge zainteresirane države članice;
Supports the recommendations of the January 2011 Foreign Affairs Council, which called on the VP/HR to pursue the subjects raised in the Weimar initiative so as to enable practical measures to be taken on the basis of a report that she is to submit to the Foreign Affairs Council by mid-2011, with a view to achieving concrete results by the end of the year as far as possible, including the potential for extending such initiatives to include other interested Member States;