natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je Italija zaprosila za pomoč v zvezi s 643 presežnimi delavci (pomoč naj bi jih prejelo 528) v 323 podjetjih, ki delujejo v sektorju, razvrščenem v oddelek 41 NACE po reviziji 2 (gradnja stavb) Uredba (ES) št. 1893/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o uvedbi statistične klasifikacije gospodarskih dejavnosti NACE Revizija 2 in o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3037/90 kakor tudi nekaterih uredb ES o posebnih statističnih področjih (UL L 393, 30.12.2006, str.
whereas Italy has requested assistance in respect of a case concerning 643 redundancies, of which 528 have been targeted for assistance, in 323 enterprises operating in the NACE Revision 2 Division 41 (‘Construction of buildings’) Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the statistical classification of economic activities NACE Revision 2 and amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3037/90 as well as certain EC Regulations on specific statistical domains (OJ L 393, 30.12.2006, p.
v italijanski regiji Trentino-Zgornje Poadižje/Južna Tirolska (ITD1 in ITD2) na ravni NUTS II,
in the NUTS II region of Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol (ITD1 and ITD2) in Italy,
od zadevnih institucij zahteva, naj naredijo, kar je potrebno za izboljšanje postopkovnih in proračunskih ureditev, da bi pospešile uporabo sredstev iz ESPG; v tem smislu ceni izboljšani postopek, ki ga je uvedla Komisija na zahtevo Parlamenta za pospešitev dodeljevanja nepovratnih sredstev in katerega namen je predložitev ocene Komisije o utemeljenosti vloge ESPG, skupaj s predlogom za uporabo sredstev iz ESPG, proračunskemu organu; upa, da bodo nadaljnje izboljšave v postopku dosežene v okviru prihodnjega pregleda ESPG ter da bo zagotovljena njegova večja učinkovitost in preglednost;
Requests the institutions involved to make the necessary efforts to improve procedural and budgetary arrangements in order to accelerate the mobilisation of the EGF; appreciates in this sense the improved procedure put in place by the Commission, following Parliament's request for accelerating the release of grants, aimed at presenting to the budgetary authority the Commission's assessment on the eligibility of an EGF application together with the proposal to mobilise the EGF; hopes that further improvements in the procedure will be within the framework of the upcoming review of the EGF and that greater efficiency and transparency will be achieved
opozarja, da so institucije zavezane zagotoviti nemoten in hiter potek postopka za sprejetje sklepov o uporabi sredstev ESPG, ki zagotavlja enkratno in časovno omejeno posamično podporo delavcem, ki so postali presežni zaradi globalizacije ter finančne in gospodarske krize; poudarja vlogo, ki jo ima lahko ESPG pri dolgoročnem ponovnem vključevanju presežnih delavcev, zlasti najbolj ogroženih in najmanj kvalificiranih, na trg dela;
Recalls the institutions' commitment to ensuring a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF, providing one-off, time-limited individual support geared to helping workers who have been made redundant as a result of globalisation and the financial and economic crisis; emphasises the role that the EGF can play in the long-term reintegration of workers made redundant into the labour market, in particular the most vulnerable and least qualified workers;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe ESPG zagotoviti, da ESPG podpira ponovno vključevanje posameznih presežnih delavcev v zaposlovanje; nadalje poudarja, da bi se morali iz pomoči ESPG sofinancirati le aktivni ukrepi na trgu dela, ki vodijo do dolgoročnih zaposlitev; ponovno poudarja, da pomoč iz ESPG ne sme nadomestiti ukrepov, za katere so odgovorna podjetja na osnovi nacionalne zakonodaje ali kolektivnih pogodb, pa tudi ne ukrepov za prestrukturiranje podjetij oziroma sektorjev; obžaluje dejstvo, da bi ESPG lahko podjetja spodbudil k zamenjavi pogodbene delovne sile s prilagodljivejšo in kratkoročnejšo;
Stresses that, in accordance with Article 6 of the EGF Regulation, it should be ensured that the EGF supports the reintegration of individual redundant workers into employment; further stresses that the EGF assistance can co-finance only active labour market measures which lead to long-term employment; reiterates that assistance from the EGF must not replace actions which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreements, nor measures restructuring companies or sectors; deplores the fact that the EGF might provide an incentive for companies to replace their contractual workforce with a more flexible and short-term one;
ugotavlja, da so med informacijami o usklajenem svežnju prilagojenih storitev, za katere je predvideno financiranje iz ESPG, tudi informacije o njihovem dopolnjevanju in združljivosti z ukrepi, ki se financirajo iz Strukturnih skladov; ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj v svoja letna poročila vključi tudi primerjalno oceno teh podatkov;
Notes that the information provided on the coordinated package of personalised services to be funded from the EGF includes information on the compatibility and complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds; reiterates its call to the Commission to present a comparative evaluation of those data in its annual reports as well;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, da podpiše ta sklep skupaj s predsednikom Sveta ter poskrbi za njegovo objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
Instructs its President to sign the decision with the President of the Council and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;
o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v skladu s točko 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (vloga EGF/2011/002 IT/Trentino-Zgornje Poadižje/Južna Tirolska – gradnja stavb, Italija)
on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/002 IT/Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol Construction of buildings from Italy)
Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji (v nadaljnjem besedilu: ESPG) je bil ustanovljen za zagotavljanje dodatne podpore delavcem, ki so postali presežni zaradi velikih strukturnih sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih, do katerih je prišlo zaradi globalizacije, ter za pomoč pri njihovi ponovni vključitvi na trg dela.
The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support for workers made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
Področje uporabe ESPG je bilo za vloge, vložene od 1. maja 2009 dalje, razširjeno, da bi vključili podporo delavcem, ki so postali presežni neposredno zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize.
The scope of the EGF was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis.
Italija je 7. februarja 2011 vložila vlogo za uporabo sredstev ESPG v zvezi s presežnimi delavci v 323 podjetjih, ki delujejo v sektorju, razvrščenem v oddelek 41 NACE po reviziji 2 (gradnja stavb), v regiji Trentino-Zgornje Poadižje/Južna Tirolska (ITD1 in ITD2) na ravni NUTS II, z dodatnimi informacijami pa jo je dopolnila do 6. julija 2011.
Italy submitted an application on 7 February 2011 to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in 323 enterprises operating in the NACE Revision 2 Division 41 (‘Construction of buildings’) in the NUTS II region of Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol (ITD1 and ITD2), and supplemented it by additional information up to 6 July 2011.
Komisija zato predlaga uporabo sredstev v višini 3 918 850 EUR.
The Commission, therefore, proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 3 918 850.
Zato bi bilo treba uporabiti sredstva ESPG, da se zagotovi finančni prispevek za vlogo, ki jo je predložila Italija –
The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application submitted by Italy,
V okviru splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 se iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji uporabi znesek 3 918 850 EUR v odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvah plačil.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 3 918 850 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravici do obveščenosti v kazenskem postopku ( KOM(2010)0392 – C7-0189/2010 – 2010/0215(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 December 2011 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right to information in criminal proceedings ( COM(2010)0392 – C7-0189/2010 – 2010/0215(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0392 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0392 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 82(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0189/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 82(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0189/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju prispevkov, ki so jih glede osnutka zakonodajnega akta predložili grški parlament, španski kongres poslancev, italijanski senat in portugalski parlament,
having regard to the contributions submitted by the Greek Parliament, the Spanish Congress of Deputies, the Italian Senate and the Portuguese Parliament on the draft legislative act,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0408/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0408/2011 ),
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. decembra 2011.
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure Position of the European Parliament of 13 December 2011.
Evropska unija si je zastavila cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
V skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta iz Tampereja z dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 ter zlasti s točko 33 teh sklepov bi moralo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja v Uniji postati temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v tako civilnih kot kazenskih zadevah, saj bi okrepljeno vzajemno priznavanje sodnih odločb in sodb ter potrebno približevanje zakonodaje olajšalo sodelovanje med organi in sodno varstvo pravic posameznikov.
According to the conclusions of the European Council in Tampere of 15 and 16 October 1999, and in particular point 33 thereof, the principle of mutual recognition should become the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters within the Union, since enhanced mutual recognition of judicial decisions and judgments and the necessary approximation of legislation would facilitate cooperation between authorities and the judicial protection of individual rights.
Svet je 29. novembra 2000 v skladu s sklepi iz Tampereja sprejel program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v kazenskih zadevah UL C 12, 15.1.2001, str.
On 29 November 2000 the Council, in accordance with the Tampere Conclusions, adopted a programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters OJ C 12, 15.1.2001, p.
V uvodu programa ukrepov je zapisano, da je namen vzajemnega priznavanja „okrepiti sodelovanje med državami članicami“ in „povečati varstvo pravic posameznika“.
The introduction to the programme of measures states that mutual recognition is ‘designed to strengthen cooperation between Member States’ and ‘to enhance the protection of individual rights’.
Izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v kazenskih zadevah temelji na predpostavki, da države članice zaupajo v kazenskopravne sisteme drugih držav članic.
Implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters presupposes that Member States have trust in each other's criminal justice systems.
Obseg izvajanja vzajemnega priznavanja je v veliki meri odvisen od vrste parametrov, ki vključujejo mehanizme za varovanje pravic osumljencev
The extent of the mutual recognition exercise is very much dependent on a number of parameters, which include mechanisms for safeguarding the rights of
ali obdolžencev
suspected or accused persons
in skupne minimalne standarde, potrebne za lažje izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja.
and common minimum standards necessary to facilitate the application of the principle of mutual recognition.
Vzajemno priznavanje lahko deluje učinkovito le v duhu zaupanja, kjer ne le sodni organi, temveč vsi udeleženci kazenskega postopka priznavajo odločbe sodnih organov drugih držav članic kot enakovredne svojim lastnim, kar pomeni ne le zaupanje v ustreznost pravil partnerjev, ampak tudi zaupanje v pravilno uporabo teh pravil.
Mutual recognition can only operate effectively in a spirit of confidence, whereby not only judicial authorities, but all actors in the criminal process see decisions of the judicial authorities of other Member States as equivalent to their own, implying not only trust in the adequacy of one's partners' rules, but also trust that those rules are correctly applied.
Člen 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina) in člen 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EKČP) zagotavljata pravico do poštenega sojenja.
Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter) and Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) enshrine the right to a fair trial.
Člen 6 Listine in člen 5 EKČP zagotavljata pravico do svobode in varnosti, omejitve te pravice pa ne smejo presegati tistih, ki so dovoljene v členu 5 EKČP in izhajajo iz sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
Article 6 of the Charter and Article 5 ECHR enshrine the rights to liberty and security, the limitations to which may not exceed those permitted by the ECHR in the wording of its Article 5 and inferred from the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
Čeprav so vse države članice pogodbenice EKČP ▌, izkušnje kažejo, da to samo po sebi vedno ne zagotavlja zadostne stopnje zaupanja v sisteme kazenskega pravosodja drugih držav članic.
Although Member States are parties to the ECHR ▌, experience has shown that this in itself does not always provide a sufficient degree of trust in the criminal justice systems of other Member States.
Krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja zahteva podrobna pravila o varovanju procesnih pravic in jamstev, ki izhajajo iz Listine
Strengthening mutual trust requires detailed rules on the protection of the procedural rights and guarantees stemming from the Charter
in iz
and from
Člen 82(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije določa, da se določijo minimalna pravila, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah in ki olajšajo vzajemno priznavanje sodb in sodnih odločb ter policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami.
Article 82(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides for the establishment of minimum rules applicable in the Member States so as to facilitate mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters having a cross-border dimension.
Točka (b) člena 82(2) določa, da so „pravice posameznikov v kazenskem postopku“ eno izmed področij, na katerih se lahko določijo minimalna pravila.
Point (b) of Article 82(2) refers to ‘the rights of individuals in criminal procedure’ as one of the areas in which minimum rules may be established.
Skupna minimalna pravila bi morala voditi do okrepljenega zaupanja v sisteme kazenskega pravosodja vseh držav članic, kar bi moralo po drugi strani voditi do učinkovitejšega pravosodnega sodelovanja v duhu medsebojnega zaupanja ▌.
Common minimum rules should lead to increased confidence in the criminal justice systems of all Member States, which in turn should lead to more efficient judicial cooperation in a climate of mutual trust ▌.
Taka skupna minimalna pravila bi se morala uporabljati za obveščanje v kazenskem postopku.
Such common minimum rules should apply to information in criminal proceedings.
Svet je 30. novembra 2009 sprejel Načrt za krepitev procesnih pravic osumljenih ali obtoženih oseb v kazenskem postopku (v nadaljnjem besedilu „načrt“) UL C 295, 4.12.2009, str.
On 30 November 2009, the Council adopted the Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings (‘the Roadmap’) OJ C 295, 4.12.2009, p.
Na podlagi pristopa „korak za korakom“ je v načrtu predvideno sprejetje ukrepov glede pravice do prevajanja in tolmačenja, pravice do obveščenosti o pravicah in o
Taking a step-by-step approach, the Roadmap calls for the adoption of measures regarding the right to translation and interpretation, the right to information on rights and information about the
, pravice do pravnega svetovanja in pravne pomoči, pravice do komuniciranja s sorodniki, delodajalci in konzularnimi organi ter glede posebnega varstva za osumljence ali obdolžence, ki spadajo v skupino ranljivih oseb.
, the right to legal advice and legal aid, the right to communication with relatives, employers and consular authorities, and regarding special safeguards for suspected or accused persons who are vulnerable.
Poudaril je, da načrt še ni končan, ter pozval Komisijo, naj prouči še druge vidike minimalnih procesnih pravic osumljencev ali obdolžencev in oceni, ali je treba za boljše sodelovanje na tem področju proučiti tudi druga vprašanja, na primer domnevo nedolžnosti.
The European Council underlined the non-exhaustive character of the Roadmap, by inviting the Commission to examine further aspects of minimum procedural rights for suspected and accused persons, and to assess whether other issues, for instance the presumption of innocence, need to be addressed, in order to promote better cooperation in this area.
Prvi ukrep v načrtu je Direktiva 2010/64/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o pravici do tolmačenja in prevajanja v kazenskih postopkih UL L 280, 26.10.2010, str.
The first measure on the Roadmap is Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p.
Ta direktiva se nanaša na ukrep B načrta.
This Directive relates to measure B of the Roadmap.
Z namenom krepitve medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami določa skupne minimalne standarde na področju obveščanja o pravicah in o obtožbi, ki se zagotovijo osebam, osumljenim ali obdolženim storitve kaznivega dejanja.
It lays down common minimum standards to be applied in the field of information about rights and about the
o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti
builds on the rights laid down in the
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu z naslovom Zagotavljanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane Evrope – Akcijski načrt izvajanja stockholmskega programa KOM (2010)0171, 20.4.2010.
In its Communication ‘Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe's citizens’, the Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme COM(2010)0171 , 20.4.2010.
, za leto 2010 napovedala predložitev predloga o pravici do obveščenosti.
, the Commission announced the presentation of a proposal on the right to information in 2010.
Direktiva bi se morala uporabljati za osumljence in obdolžence na ozemlju EU, ne glede na njihov pravni status, državljanstvo ali nacionalnost.
This Directive should apply to suspected and accused persons regardless of their legal status, citizenship or nationality.
V nekaterih državah članicah je organ, ki ni sodišče, pristojno za kazenske zadeve, pristojen naložiti sankcije za relativno manjše kršitve.
In some Member States an authority other than a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters has competence for imposing sanctions in relation to relatively minor offences.
Pravica do obveščenosti o
The right to information about
pravicah (ki izhaja iz sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice) bi morala biti izrecno zagotovljena v Direktivi. ▌
rights (which is inferred from the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights) should be explicitly established by this Directive. ▌
obdolženca bi morali pristojni organi brez odlašanja
by the competent authorities of those rights, as they apply under national law, which are essential to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings,
obvestiti o pravicah
be it orally or in writing
Ta direktiva določa minimalna pravila o obveščenosti o pravicah osumljene ali obdolžene osebe.
This Directive lays down minimum rules with respect to the information on rights of the suspected or accused person.
Ko ta direktiva podeljuje pravice osumljenim ali obdolženim osebam, ki so prijete ali pridržane, bi bilo treba to razumeti kot vsako situacijo, v kateri je osebi tekom kazenskega postopka odvzeta prostost v smislu člena 5(1)(c) EKČP, kakor to razlaga sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
Where this Directive confers rights on suspected and accused persons who are arrested or detained, this should be understood as any situation where, in the course of criminal proceedings, the person is deprived of his liberty within the meaning of Article 5(1)(c) ECHR as interpreted by the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
Kadar je osumljenec ali obdolženec prijet
Where a suspected or accused person is arrested
ali pridržan
or detained
, bi ga bilo treba o
, information about
procesnih pravicah ▌obvestiti s pisnim obvestilom o pravicah, napisanim na lahko razumljiv način,
procedural rights should be given by means of a written Letter of Rights drafted in an easily comprehensible manner so as to
da se pripomore k temu
assist the
, da bi svoje pravice dejansko razumel.
actual understanding of his rights.
Pisno obvestilo o pravicah bi bilo treba takoj izročiti vsaki prijeti osebi, ko ji je med kazenskim postopkom in s posegom organov kazenskega pregona odvzeta prostost.
Such a Letter of Rights should be provided promptly to each arrested person when he is deprived of liberty by the intervention of law enforcement authorities in the context of criminal proceedings.
Dejansko obvestilo
The actual Letter
tudi druge zadevne procesne pravice, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah.
also include other relevant procedural rights that apply in Member States.
Države članice v nacionalnem pravu določijo posebne pogoje in pravila za obveščanje drugih oseb o prijetju ali pridržanju, pri čemer se razume, kar določa tudi načrt, in sicer da izvrševanje te pravice ne bi smelo posegati v potek kazenskega postopka.
The specific conditions and rules for informing one other person about the arrest or detention are to be determined by the Member States in their national law, it being understood, as set out in the Roadmap, that the exercise of this right should not prejudice the due course of the criminal proceedings.
Ta direktiva ne posega v določbe nacionalnega prava o varnosti oseb, ki se nahajajo v prostorih za izvrševanje ukrepa odvzema prostosti.
This Directive is without prejudice to the provisions of national law concerning safety of persons remaining in detention facilities.