natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je nujno posvetovanje evropskih in nacionalnih organov s čebelarji pri pripravi čebelarskih programov in sorodne zakonodaje, da bi zagotovili učinkovitost teh programov in njihovo pravočasno izvajanje; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi znatno več finančnih sredstev, okrepi sedanjo podporo čebelarstvu v okviru SKP po letu 2013, zagotovi neprekinjen obstoj ter izboljšanje sedanjih programov podpore za čebelarski sektor (Uredba (ES) št. 1221/97) in spodbudi razvoj skupnih projektov; države članice pa poziva, naj zagotovijo tehnično pomoč za čebelarski sektor; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi skladnost sistema sofinanciranja z vzpostavitvijo neposredne pomoči v okviru prvega stebra SKP (neobvezno izvajanje sedanjega člena 68 SKP) v tistih državah članicah, ki bodo ocenile, da je to potrebno; poudarja, da je treba spodbuditi mlade čebelarje k opravljanju dejavnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi varnostno mrežo ali skupni sistem zavarovanja za čebelarstvo, da bi ublažili vpliv kriznih razmer na čebelarje;
Stresses the need for consultation with beekeepers by European and national authorities during the drawing up of apiculture programmes and of related legislation, in order to ensure the effectiveness of these programmes and their timely implementation; calls on the Commission to provide significantly more financial resources, by stepping up the current support for apiculture in the CAP after 2013 and guaranteeing the continued existence and improvement of the existing support programmes(Regulation (EC) No 1221/97) for the beekeeping sector, and to encourage the development of joint projects, and on the Member States to provide technical assistance for the beekeeping sector; calls on the Commission to ensure that the system of co-financing is compatible with the establishment of direct aid under the first pillar of the CAP (optional implementation of the current Article 68 of the CAP) by those states that consider it necessary; stresses also the need to encourage young beekeepers to enter the sector; calls on the Commission to provide a safety net or a common insurance system for apiculture in order to mitigate the impact of crisis situations on beekeepers;
poziva Komisijo, naj v prihodnji reformi SKP pojasni ukrepe podpore in pomoči za evropski čebelarski sektor ob upoštevanju okoljskih in družbenih javnih dobrin, ki jih zagotavljajo čebelje družine z opraševanjem, ter okoljske storitve, ki jih zagotavljajo čebelarji z vzrejo čebeljih družin;
Calls on the Commission to clarify, in the forthcoming reform of the CAP, the support measures and aid to be assigned to the European beekeeping sector, taking account of the environmental and social public goods that honeybee colonies provide via pollination and of the environmental service performed by beekeepers in managing their bee colonies;
ugotavlja, da se je skupno število čebelarjev v EU po navedbah Komisije v poročilu z dne 28. maja 2010 rahlo povečalo glede na leto 2004; poudarja navedbe poročila, da je to povečanje mogoče pripisati zgolj pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije v EU ter da bi brez upoštevanja čebelarjev iz teh dveh držav ugotovili močno zmanjšanje števila čebelarjev v EU; meni, da ta podatek zgovorno priča o resnosti stanja v čebelarskem sektorju v EU ter da je treba temu sektorju pomagati in sprejeti konkretne ukrepe, s katerimi bi čebelarje zadržali v čebelarstvu;
Notes that, according to the Commission report of 28 May 2010, the overall number of beekeepers in the EU has risen slightly in comparison with 2004; points out that, according to the report, this increase is solely attributable to the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU, and that, without the beekeepers from those countries, there would have been a significant decrease in the number of beekeepers in the EU; views this as indicative of the gravity of the situation in the beekeeping sector in the EU and of the need to grant it assistance and to implement concrete measures to keep beekeepers in beekeeping;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost vzpostavitve posebne sheme za pomoč čebelarjem v okviru sheme neposredne pomoči, na primer prek plačil za čebelje družine, ki bi pomagala ohraniti čebelarski sektor v EU, zadržala čebelarje v čebelarstvu, k čebelarjenju spodbudila mlade ter zagotovila, da bodo čebele še naprej opravljale vlogo opraševalk;
Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of creating a special scheme for assistance to beekeepers within the framework of the direct aid scheme, for example through bee colony payments, which will help safeguard the beekeeping sector in the EU, keep beekeepers in beekeeping, encourage young people to become beekeepers and ensure bees continue to act as pollinators;
poziva Komisijo, naj v SKP spodbuja trajnostne kmetijske prakse, naj vse kmete spodbuja k uporabi preprostih kmetijskih praks v skladu z Direktivo 2009/128/ES ter naj okrepi posebne kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe za čebelarski sektor v duhu nove strategije EU za biotsko raznovrstnost; poziva države članice, naj v svojih programih za razvoj podeželja določijo kmetijsko-okoljske ukrepe za čebelarstvo in spodbudijo kmete k sodelovanju v kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepih, da bi zaščitili „medonosnim čebelam prijazne“ travnike na ozarah, in k uporabi napredne integrirane pridelave s celovitim pristopom h kmetijstvu in z uporabo biotičnega zatiranja, kjer je mogoče;
Calls on the Commission to promote sustainable agricultural practices in the CAP, to encourage all farmers to employ simple agronomic practices in line with Directive 2009/128/EC and to strengthen agri-environmental measures specific to the beekeeping sector, in the spirit of the new EU Biodiversity Strategy; calls on the Member States to lay down agri-environmental measures geared to apiculture in their rural development programmes and to encourage farmers to engage in agri-environmental measures supporting ‘bee-friendly’ grasslands on field margins and to employ an advanced level of integrated production, taking a holistic approach to farming and using biological control where possible;
ponovno poudarja, da so po mnenju Komisije medonosne čebele udomačene vrste ter zato spadajo v sektor živinoreje, kar omogoča sprejetje ukrepov za boljše zdravje, dobro počutje in varstvo S pobudami, kot je Strategija zdravstvenega varstva živali za EU (2007–2013), ki pomaga zagotoviti enoten in jasen regulativni okvir za zdravje živali, izboljšuje usklajevanje in učinkovito rabo virov s strani ustreznih evropskih agencij in poudarja pomen ohranjanja in izboljšanja zmogljivosti diagnosticiranja.
Reaffirms that the Commission considers honeybees to be a domesticated species, and therefore a livestock sector, which facilitates better health, welfare and protection measures Through initiatives such as the Animal Health Strategy for the EU (2007-2013), which helps provide a single and clear regulatory framework for animal health, improves coordination and the efficient use of resources by relevant European agencies, and emphasises the importance of maintaining and improving diagnostic capability.
ter boljše obveščanje o ohranjanju divjih opraševalcev; zato poziva k oblikovanju strategije za varovanje zdravja čebel in vključitvi čebelarstva v kmetijski ali veterinarski zakonodaji ob upoštevanju njegove posebnosti, zlasti v zvezi z nadomestili za čebelarje za izgube panjev;
and makes for better information on conserving wild pollinators; calls, therefore, for a bee health protection strategy to be established and for the beekeeping sector to be incorporated into agricultural legislation and veterinary legislation taking account of its specific character, particularly with regard to compensation for beekeepers' losses in their bee population;
poziva vse zainteresirane strani v čebelarskem sektorju, naj izkoristijo priložnosti, ki jih ponujata sedanja skupna kmetijska politika in njena prihajajoča reforma, ki ustrezno upoštevata organizacije proizvajalcev v kmetijskem sektorju;
Calls on all stakeholders in the beekeeping sector to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the current common agricultural policy and the upcoming reform thereof, which take proper account of producer organisations throughout the agricultural sector;
Ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti čebel
Conservation of bee biodiversity
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
Urges the Commission, within the framework of Council Directive 92/43/EEC OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru Direktive Sveta 92/65/EGS UL L 268, 14.9.1992, str.
Urges the Commission, within the framework of Council Directive 92/65/EEC OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p.
opozarja, da so ukrepi v korist biotske raznovrstnosti potrebni tudi v nekmetijskih sektorjih; ugotavlja, da so zelenice ob cestah, območja ob železniških progah, gozdna območja, kjer tečejo električni vodi, ter javni in zasebni vrtovi velike površine, ki z ustreznim upravljanjem lahko zelo povečajo vire cvetnega prahu in nektarja za čebele in opraševalne žuželke; meni, da se mora to uresničiti v okviru usklajenega upravljanja zemljišč in ob zagotavljanju cestne varnosti;
Recalls that measures to promote biodiversity are also vital in the non-farm sector; notes that green spaces along roads, verges of railway lines, forest cuttings for energy transmission networks and public and private gardens cover substantial areas where rational management methods can considerably increase pollen and nectar resources for bees and pollinating insects; considers that this development should be pursued in the context of harmonious land management, which in particular maintains road safety;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. novembra 2011 o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena ( 2011/2146(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 15 November 2011 on reform of the EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest ( 2011/2146(INI) )
ob upoštevanju členov 14 in 106 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter priloženega Protokola št. 26,
having regard to Articles 14 and 106 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to Protocol No 26 thereto,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 23. marca 2011 o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena ( KOM(2011)0146 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 23 March 2011 on reform of the EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest ( COM(2011)0146 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 23. marca 2011 o uporabi pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena od leta 2005 in izidih javnega posvetovanja ( SEK(2011)0397 ),
having regard to the Commission staff working document of 23 March 2011 on the application of EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest since 2005 and the outcome of the public consultation ( SEC(2011)0397 ),
ob upoštevanju javnega posvetovanja, ki ga je v letu 2010 organizirala Komisija, o državni pomoči in pravilih za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena,
having regard to the public consultation organised by the Commission in 2010 on ‘state aid rules on services of general economic interest’,
ob upoštevanju smernic z dne 7. decembra 2010 za uporabo pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči, javnih naročilih in notranjem trgu za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, vključno s socialnimi storitvami ( SEK(2010)1545 ),
having regard to the ‘Guide to the application of the European Union rules on state aid, public procurement and the internal market to services of general economic interest, and in particular to social services of general interest’ of 7 December 2010 ( SEC(2010)1545 ),
ob upoštevanju Direktive Komisije 2006/111/ES z dne 16. novembra 2006 o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji ter o finančni preglednosti znotraj določenih podjetij UL L 318, 17.11.06, str.
having regard to Commission Directive 2006/111/EC of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings OJ L 318, 17.11.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str.
having regard to Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to state aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju Okvira skupnosti za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve UL C 297, 29.11.05, str.
having regard to the Community framework for state aid in the form of public service compensation OJ C 297, 29.11.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. januarja 2001 o storitvah v splošnem interesu v Evropi UL C 17, 19.01.2001, str.
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 19 January 2001 on European services of general interest OJ C 17, 19.1.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. septembra 1996 o storitvah v splošnem interesu v Evropi UL C 281, 26.9.1996, str.
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 26 September 1996 on European services of general interest OJ C 281, 26.9.1996, p.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 1. julija 2011 o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena UL C 259, 2.9.11, str.
having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 1 July 2011 on reform of the EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest OJ C 259, 2.9.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 15. junija 2011 o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena UL C 248, 25.8.2011, str.
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 15 June 2011 on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on reform of the EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest OJ C 248, 25.8.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju sodbe Evropskega sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH Zadeva C-280/00, [2004] PSES I-07747.
having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 24 July 2003 in the case of Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH Case C-280/00, [2004] ECR I-07747.
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 5. julija o prihodnosti socialnih storitev splošnega pomena Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0319 .
having regard to its resolutions of 5 July 2011 on the future of social services of general interest Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0319 .
, z dne 14. marca 2007 o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropski uniji UL C 301 E, 13.12.2007, str.
, of 14 March 2007 on social services of general interest in the European Union OJ C 301 E, 13.12.2007, p.
, z dne 27. septembra 2006 o Beli knjigi Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena UL C 306 E, 15.12.2006, str.
, of 27 September 2006 on the Commission white paper on services of general interest OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006, p.
, z dne 14. januarja 2004 o Zeleni knjigi o storitvah splošnega pomena UL C 92 E, 16.4.2004, str.
, of 14 January 2004 on the green paper on services of general interest OJ C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
, z dne 13. novembra 2001 o sporočilu Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropi UL C 140 E, 13.6.2002, str.
, of 13 November 2001 on the Commission communication entitled ‘Services of general interest in Europe’ OJ C 140 E, 13.6.2002, p.
in z dne 17. decembra 1997 o sporočilu Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropi UL C 14, 19.1.1998, str.
and of 17 December 1997 on the Commission communication entitled ‘Services of general interest in Europe’ OJ C 14, 19.1.1998, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0371/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0371/2011 ),
ker imajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena zelo pomembno mesto v skupnih vrednotah Unije ter spodbujajo temeljne pravice, socialno, ekonomsko in teritorialno kohezijo ter imajo zato ključno vlogo v boju proti družbenim neenakostim ter v prizadevanjih za trajnostni razvoj,
whereas services of general economic interest (SGEI) have an important place in the shared values of the Union, and promote fundamental rights and social, economic and territorial cohesion, and are thus crucial to the fight against societal inequalities and, increasingly, also to sustainable development;
ker storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena bistveno prispevajo h gospodarski učinkovitosti in konkurenčnosti držav članic, s čimer pa ne prispevajo samo k preprečevanju in premagovanju gospodarskih kriz, ampak tudi k skupni gospodarski blaginji;
whereas SGEI make a significant contribution to the Member States' economic performance and competitiveness and thus not only help to prevent and overcome economic crises but also serve the cause of general economic well-being;
ker zagotavljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena podpira uspešno izvajanje strategije Evropa 2020 in ker lahko te storitve, zlasti na področju zaposlovanja, izobraževanja in socialnega vključevanja, prispevajo k uresničevanju ciljev glede rasti, tako da bo na koncu mogoče doseči zastavljeno visoko stopnjo produktivnosti, zaposlenosti in socialne kohezije;
whereas the successful implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy is bolstered by the provision of SGEI, and whereas these services can help with reaching growth targets in the areas of employment, education and social integration in particular, so that in the end the high level of productivity, employment and social cohesion that has been set can be achieved;
ker so stroškovno učinkovite rešitve konkurenčnih zasebnih podjetij potrebne v interesu državljanov in bistvene glede na proračunski položaj;
whereas cost-effective solutions by competing private undertakings are necessary in the interest of the citizen and essential against the background of the budgetary situation;
ker so storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena storitve, ki jih brez posredovanja države ne bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti oziroma jih ne bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti v zadostnem obsegu;
whereas SGEI are services that cannot always be provided, or cannot be provided adequately, without public intervention;
ker imajo storitve splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti odločilno vlogo pri zagotavljanju temeljnih pravic in bistveno povečujejo enakost možnosti;
whereas social services of general interest (SSGI) play an important role in underpinning basic rights and make a major contribution to equality of opportunity;
ker veljavna zakonodaja EU predvideva izvzetje iz obveznosti priglasitve za bolnišnice in socialna stanovanja, tj. storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ki izpolnjujejo osnovne socialne potrebe;
whereas the current EU legislation provides for exemption from notification for hospitals and social housing, i.e. SGEI meeting basic social needs;
ker člena 106 in 107 PDEU zagotavljata pravno podlago za preoblikovanje pravil o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena in člen 14 PDEU omogoča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, da na podlagi uredb v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom določita načela in pogoje delovanja splošnih storitev gospodarskega pomena, zlasti gospodarskih in finančnih pogojev, brez poseganja v pristojnosti držav članic;
whereas Articles 106 and 107 TFEU provide the legal basis for the reform of state aid rules for SGEI, and Article 14 TFEU allows the European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, to establish the principles and conditions for the operation of SGEI, particularly economic and financial conditions, without prejudice to the competences of the Member States;
ker je v Protokolu št. 26 PDEU določeno, da bi morala za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena veljati visoka raven kakovosti, varnosti in cenovne dostopnosti, enaka obravnava ter spodbujanje splošnega dostopa in pravic uporabnikov, ter izrecno priznava njihovo bistveno vlogo;
whereas Protocol No 26 TFEU establishes that SGEI should be characterised by a high level of quality, safety and affordability, equal treatment and the promotion of universal access and user rights, and explicitly recognises their essential role;
ker so države članice in njihovi javni organi v najboljšem položaju, da služijo svojim državljanom na ustrezen način in so odgovorni za natančno določitev obsega in načina zagotavljanja storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena; ker člen 1 Protokola št. 26 Lizbonske pogodbe izrecno priznava široke diskrecijske pravice za nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne organe, da jih upravljajo, naročajo in organizirajo;
whereas the Member States and their public authorities are in the best position to properly serve their citizens and thus are responsible for determining the precise extent and the way in which SGEI are provided, and whereas Article 1 of Protocol No 26 to the Lisbon Treaty explicitly recognises the wide discretionary powers of national, regional and local authorities to manage, commission and organise them;
ker nadomestila zajemajo vse ugodnosti, ki jih odobri država ali ki se odobrijo v okviru državnih sredstev v kakršni koli obliki;
whereas compensatory payments encompass all advantages granted by the state or through state resources in any form whatsoever;
se seznanja s cilji preoblikovanja v predlogu Komisije, katerih namen je zagotoviti večjo jasnost pri uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ob upoštevanju raznolikosti teh storitev;
Notes the aims of the reform proposed by the Commission in seeking to clarify the application of the rules on aid for SGEI, taking into account their diversity;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni razmerje med pravili o notranjem trgu in zagotavljanjem javnih storitev ter naj zagotovi uporabo načela solidarnosti pri opredelitvi, organizaciji in financiranju javnih storitev;
Demands that the Commission provide clarification of the relationship between the rules of the internal market, and the provision of public services and that it ensure that the principle of subsidiarity is applied in the definition, organisation and financing of public services;
poudarja izboljšave glede uporabe in razumljivosti, ki so jih omogočili ukrepi, sprejeti leta 2005, znani kot sveženj Altmark; opozarja, da so javna posvetovanja kljub temu pokazala, da morajo biti pravni instrumenti še jasnejši, enostavnejši, bolj sorazmerni in učinkoviti;
Highlights the improvements in terms of application and comprehensibility that have been possible thanks to the measures taken in 2005, known as the Altmark package; points out that the public consultations have nevertheless shown that the legal instruments need to be even clearer and more straightforward, proportionate and effective;