natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 5. julija 2011 o povzetku odzivov na javno posvetovanje o posodobitvi direktive o poklicnih kvalifikacijah http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/qualifications/docs/news/20110706-summary-replies-public-consultation-pdq_en.pdf.
having regard to the Commission working document of 5 July 2011 on the summary of the responses to the public consultation on the modernisation of the Professional Qualifications Directive http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/qualifications/docs/news/20110706-summary-replies-public-consultation-pdq_en.pdf.
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 5. julija 2011 o oceni direktive o poklicnih kvalifikacijah http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/qualifications/docs/news/20110706-evaluation-directive-200536ec_en.pdf.
having regard to the Commission working document of 5 July 2011 on the evaluation of the Professional Qualifications Directive http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/qualifications/docs/news/20110706-evaluation-directive-200536ec_en.pdf.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A7-0373/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and to the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0373/2011 ),
ker bo mobilnost strokovnjakov znotraj Evropske unije zaradi demografskih sprememb pridobivala vedno večji pomen;
whereas changing demographics will make the mobility of professionals across the European Union increasingly important;
ker spremembe na trgih dela zahtevajo večjo preglednost, poenostavitev in prožnost pravil za priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij;
whereas changing labour markets call for greater transparency, simplification and flexibility in the rules on the recognition of professional qualifications;
ker je poklicna mobilnost ključni dejavnik za gospodarski razvoj in trajnostno okrevanje gospodarstva;
whereas professional mobility is a key factor for economic development and sustainable economic recovery;
ker se bo po ugotovitvah Evropskega centra za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja (Cedefop) povpraševanje po kvalificiranih delavcih v Evropski uniji do leta 2020 po pričakovanjih povečalo za več kot 16 milijonov delovnih mest;
whereas, according to the findings of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), demand for highly skilled workers is expected to rise by over 16 million jobs in the European Union between now and 2020;
ker je pravica do zaposlitve ali do opravljanja storitev v drugi državi članici temeljna pravica, ki izhaja iz Pogodb, in je otipljiv primer koristi, ki jo imajo lahko državljani od enotnega trga;
whereas the right to obtain employment or provide services in another Member State is a fundamental right under the Treaties and constitutes a concrete example of how citizens can benefit from the Single Market;
ker lahko prosto gibanje oseb znotraj EU in pravica do priznanja dosežkov in poklicnega znanja ter veščin obstajata samo, če se obstoječe nevidne prepreke čim bolj omejijo in se odpravijo nekateri nacionalni predpisi, ki trenutno nesorazmerno ovirajo uveljavljanje pravice do kvalificiranega delovnega mesta;
whereas free movement of persons within the EU and the right to recognition of merit and professional skills will only exist when the invisible barriers that now exist have been reduced to a minimum and certain national rules that currently disproportionately hinder use of the right to skilled jobs have disappeared;
ker je optimalna organizacija sistema priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij osnovni pogoj, da lahko vsakdo v celoti uživa prednosti prostega gibanja;
whereas ensuring that the system for recognition of professional qualifications is designed in the best possible way is a prerequisite for enabling everyone to fully enjoy the benefits of freedom of movement;
ker je v aktu za enotni trg poudarjeno, da je posodobitev sistema za priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij bistvenega pomena za povečanje gospodarske rasti ter okrepitev zaupanja strokovnjakov in državljanov;
whereas the Single Market Act highlighted the fact that modernising the system for recognising professional qualifications is key to enhancing economic growth and boosting the confidence of members of the professions and of the public;
ker je eden od glavnih razlogov za težave pri priznavanju akademskih nazivov in poklicnih kvalifikacij pomanjkanje zaupanja v merila, ki se uporabljajo za akreditacijo in priznavanje akademskih spričeval v državi izvora, zaradi česar je nujno določiti ukrepe za samodejno priznavanje z odpravo predsodkov in formalnih nacionalnih ovir za priznavanje;
whereas one of the main reasons for difficulties in recognising academic titles and professional qualifications is a lack of confidence in the criteria used for accreditation and granting academic qualifications in the country of origin, so that there is an urgent need to establish automatic recognition measures by removing prejudice and formal national obstacles to recognition;
ker je bilo po direktivi od leta 2007 sprejetih okoli 100 000 sklepov o priznavanju, ki so omogočili mobilnost 85 000 strokovnjakom Evropska komisija, Ocenjevanje direktive o poklicnih kvalifikacijah, Bruselj, 5. julij 2011
whereas some 100 000 decisions on recognition have been taken under the Directive since 2007, making mobility possible for 85 000 professionals European Commission, ‘Evaluation of the Professional Qualifications Directive’, Brussels, 5 July 2011.
ker so zdravstveni delavci najbolj mobilni od reguliranih poklicev v EU, saj so bile od leta 2007 do 2010 kvalifikacije priznane okoli 57.200 zdravnikom, medicinskim sestram, zobozdravnikom, farmacevtom, babicam in veterinarjem;
whereas health professionals are the most mobile of the regulated professions in the EU, with some 57 200 doctors, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, midwives and veterinary surgeons being granted recognition between 2007 and 2010;
ker še vedno obstaja vrzel med pričakovanji državljanov in dejanskim stanjem, pri čemer se je več kot 16 % vseh primerov mreže SOLVIT v letu 2010 nanašalo na priznavanje poklicnih kvalifikacij Evropska komisija, Generalni direktorat za notranji trg, Poročilo SOLVIT 2010: Razvoj in uspešnost mreže SOLVIT v letu 2010, (2011).
whereas there is still a gap between citizens' expectations and reality, with more than 16 % of SOLVIT cases in 2010 relating to recognition of professional qualifications European Commission, DG MARKT, SOLVIT 2010 Report: Development and performance of the SOLVIT network in 2010, (2011).
ker je težko določiti pristojni organ za priznanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, saj so postopki zanj zapleteni;
whereas it is difficult to identify the authority responsible for recognition of professional qualifications, the procedures relating to which are complex;
ker direktiva o uveljavljanju pravic bolnikov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva zahteva, da države članice, kjer poteka zdravljenje, zagotovijo, da so organom drugih držav članic na voljo informacije o pravici strokovnjakov s področja zdravstvenega varstva, navedenih v nacionalnih ali lokalnih registrih, ki so vzpostavljeni na njihovem ozemlju, do opravljanja poklica, in da izmenjava teh informacij poteka prek informacijskega sistema za notranji trg;
whereas the Directive on the application of patients' rights in cross-border health care requires that Member States of treatment ensure that information on the right to practise of health professionals listed in national or local registers established on their territory is made available to the authorities of other Member States, with an exchange of information taking place via the Internal Market Information system;
ker je bilo leta 2010 kar 220 zadev mreže SOLVIT povezanih s poklicnimi kvalifikacijami, več kot dve tretjini njih pa jih je bilo iz samo štirih držav članic;
whereas SOLVIT cases relating to professional qualifications numbered 220 in 2010, with over two thirds of these cases emerging from just four Member States;
ker je Direktiva 2005/36/ES združila pravila iz 15 predhodnih direktiv, sprejetih od leta 1960 naprej;
whereas Directive 2005/36/EC consolidated rules set out in 15 previous directives adopted from the 1960s onwards;
ker vse države članice niso pravočasno prenesle Direktive 2005/36/ES, ki se je začela v celoti izvajati šele tri leta po prvotnem roku,
whereas Directive 2005/36/EC was not transposed on time by all the Member States, only being fully implemented three years after the original deadline;
ker bi pravilna uporaba te direktive okrepila človeško razsežnost enotnega trga;
whereas the proper application of this Directive would reinforce the human dimension of the Single Market;
ker lahko uvedba evropske poklicne izkaznice poenostavi in pospeši proces priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij;
whereas the introduction of a European professional card could simplify and speed up the process of recognising professional qualifications;
Poenostavitev za državljane
Simplification for citizens
meni, da je prosto gibanje čedalje večjega števila visoko kvalificiranih oseb in delavcev ena od ključnih prednosti evropskega sodelovanja in konkurenčnega notranjega trga ter pomemben dejavnik za razvoj gospodarstev v EU in pravica vsakega državljana EU; trdno verjame, da bi bilo treba povečati poklicno mobilnost evropskih državljanov in odpraviti posredne ovire, če je le zagotovljeno ravnotežje med mobilnostjo in kakovostjo poklicnih kvalifikacij;
Believes that the free movement of a growing number of highly skilled persons and of workers is one of the key benefits of European cooperation and of a competitive internal market, an important factor in the development of economies across the EU and a right enjoyed by every EU citizen; firmly believes that workers' mobility should be enhanced for citizens of the EU and that indirect barriers should be eliminated, provided that a balance is struck between mobility and the quality of professional qualifications;
podpira vse pobude, katerih namen je olajšati čezmejno mobilnost kot sredstvo za učinkovito delovanje trgov dela in način za okrepitev gospodarske rasti in konkurenčnosti v EU; priznava, da bi bilo treba Direktivo 2005/36/ES posodobiti, da bi zagotavljala jasen in trden pravni okvir;
Encourages all initiatives that aim to facilitate cross-border mobility as a means to the efficient functioning of labour markets and a way of enhancing economic growth and competitiveness within the EU; recognises the need for modernisation of Directive 2005/36/EC in order to guarantee a clear, robust legal framework;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj še naprej spodbujajo mobilnost med strokovnjaki; utemeljuje, da je sorazmerno majhno število mobilnih strokovnjakov razlog za skrb in predlaga pripravo strategij za rešitev te težave; poudarja rezultat nedavne raziskave Eurobarometra, po kateri je več kot 50 odstotkov mladih v Evropi pripravljenih delati v tujini ali navdušenih nad tem Evropska komisija – Evrobarometer „Flash“, Mladi in mobilnost: analitično poročilo, maj 2011.
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to further encourage mobility among professionals; argues that the relatively low numbers of mobile professionals is cause for concern and suggests that strategies be devised to tackle this problem; underlines the result of the recent Eurobarometer survey according to which more than 50 per cent of young people in Europe are willing or keen to work abroad European Commission - Flash Eurobarometer, ‘Youth on the Move: Analytical Report’, May 2011.
poziva države članice, naj širijo koristi direktive med svojimi državljani in strokovnjaki;
Calls on Member States to promote the benefits of the directive among their citizens and professionals;
meni, da je za uskladitev usposabljanja bistvenega pomena dialog med deležniki z namenom rednega posodabljanja zahtev glede osnovnega usposabljanja ter priznavanja izkušenj in stalnega poklicnega izpopolnjevanja; obenem meni, da z uvedbo „28. ureditve“ v nacionalnem sistemu ni mogoče jasno in zadovoljivo rešiti vprašanja razlik na področju usposabljanja;
Considers that dialogue between stakeholders with a view to regularly updating the requirements for initial training, recognition of experience and continuous professional development has an essential role to play in harmonising training; considers, moreover, that superimposing a ‘28th regime’ on national systems is not the way to resolve the issue of differences in training in a clear and satisfactory manner;
poudarja, da se večina tistih, ki so se odzvali na javno razpravo Komisije, ni opredelila za načelo delnega dostopa, da bi ga bilo v praksi težko nadzorovati in da ga je treba pojasniti; kljub temu meni, da bi lahko načelo delnega dostopa prineslo koristi, vendar samo pri tistih poklicih, pri katerih je mogoče jasno razmejiti naloge; poziva k temeljiti oceni tega načela in k temu, da bi se o njegovi uporabi odločalo za vsak primer posebej, vendar bi izključevalo regulirane poklice, povezane z zdravjem in varnostjo;
Points out that the principle of partial access is seen as undesirable by the majority of respondents to the Commission's public consultation, is difficult to monitor in practice and must be clarified; stresses, however, that partial access could have benefits, but only for those professions where tasks can be clearly demarcated; calls for a thorough evaluation of the principle, and for it to be applied on a case-by-case basis, but excluding regulated professions with health and safety implications;
pozdravlja skupni uspeh postopka samodejnega priznavanja; vendar poudarja, da je postopek priznavanja po splošnem sistemu, ki temelji na poklicnih izkušnjah, preveč zapleten in dolgotrajen tako za pristojne organe kot za osebe, ki opravljajo nekatere poklice;
Welcomes the overall success of the automatic recognition procedure; stresses, however, that the recognition process under the general system based on professional experience is excessively cumbersome and time-consuming for both the competent authorities and those engaged in certain professions;
sicer opozarja na pomen sistema predhodne prijave, vendar ugotavlja, da so bili na javnem posvetovanju Komisije v letu 2011 izraženi številni pomisleki in da morajo biti ukrepi za izboljšanje občasne mobilnosti strokovnjakov bistveni vidik prihodnje spremembe direktive o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij; poziva k nadaljnji pojasnitvi koncepta začasnega in priložnostnega opravljanja storitev, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da ni mogoče izdelati opredelitve, ki bi veljala za vse poklice, in da bi to spodkopalo subsidiarnost;
Notes, while underlining the importance of the prior declaration system, that numerous concerns were raised in the Commission's public consultation of 2011, and that measures to improve temporary mobility for professionals should therefore form a key aspect of the forthcoming revision of the Professional Qualifications Directive; calls for further clarification of the concept of temporary and occasional provision of services, bearing in mind that one definition covering all professions would be impossible to develop and would undermine subsidiarity;
opozarja, da imajo pristojni organi težave z izvajanjem ureditve predhodne prijave, saj ni doslednega pristopa k ocenjevanju začasne in priložnostne narave storitev, in da je zelo težko spremljati dejavnosti ponudnikov storitev na terenu; poziva Komisijo, naj ovrednoti trenutno veljavne določbe iz člena 7 direktive in nadalje pojasni vprašanje obstoječe sodne prakse, predvsem kar zadeva poklice, povezane javnim zdravjem in varnostjo; poziva Komisijo, naj svoje zaključke predstavi Parlamentu;
Argues that the competent authorities face difficulties in applying the prior declaration regime as there is no consistent approach to assessing the temporary and occasional nature of a service, and that it is extremely difficult to monitor the service providers' activities on the ground; calls on the Commission to evaluate the current provisions set out in Article 7 of the directive and to explain further the question of existing case-law, with regard specifically to professions with public health and safety implications; calls on the Commission to present its conclusions to Parliament;
poudarja, da večina deležnikov meni, da je člen 7(4) direktive, ki državam članicam omogoča predhodno preverjanje poklicnih kvalifikacij pri poklicih, ki so povezani z zdravjem in varnostjo in še niso zajeti v avtomatično priznavanje, bistven; kljub temu meni, da bi morale države članice zaradi večje preglednosti pojasniti, kateri poklici po njihovem mnenju vplivajo na zdravje in varnost;
Stresses that Article 7(4) of the Directive, which allows Member States to carry out prior checks on qualifications for those professions related to health and safety and not already covered under automatic recognition, is considered essential by a vast majority of stakeholders; argues, however, that in order to enhance transparency, Member States should clarify which professions they consider to have health and safety implications;
se strinja s Komisijo, da je opredelitev „reguliranega izobraževanja in usposabljanja“ preozka in bi lahko nesorazmerno ovirala začasno mobilnost strokovnjakov; meni, da bi morala zajemati vse izobraževanje in usposabljanje, ki je potrebno za opravljanje nekega poklica v državi članici izvora;
Agrees with the Commission that the definition of ‘regulated education and training’ is too restrictive and may have an undue impact on temporary mobility for professionals; considers that the definition should encompass any training that allows a profession to be pursued in the Member State of origin;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, da bi morala prijava za namene začasne mobilnosti načeloma veljati na celotnem ozemlju države članice, in naj oceni, ali so potrebne letne prijave;
Calls on the Commission to make it clear that a declaration for the purposes of temporary mobility should in principle be valid throughout the territory of a Member State, and to assess whether a yearly declaration is needed;
poziva k temu, da se ponudniki storitev, ki svoje storitve opravljajo izključno za potrošnike, tako da jih spremljajo v druge države članice, in ki nimajo stika z lokalnimi potrošniki v državi članici gostiteljici (npr. turistični vodniki, trenerji, zdravstveno osebje, ki spremlja športnike), izvzamejo iz obveznosti predhodne prijave iz člena 7; se za to zavzema pri vseh storitvah, ki ne zadevajo javnega zdravja in varnosti;
Calls for service providers who provide their services exclusively to consumers escorted by them to other Member States, and who therefore have no contact with local consumers in the host Member State (e.g. tour guides, trainers, medical personnel accompanying sportsmen or -women), to be exempted from the prior declaration requirement pursuant to Article 7; advocates this in the case of all services that do not concern public health and safety;
poziva Komisijo, naj uskladi in združi različne vire informacij, ki so trenutno na voljo o vprašanjih v zvezi s priznavanjem poklicnih kvalifikacij – vključno z nacionalnimi kontaktnimi točkami in strokovnimi telesi, s portalom Tvoja Evropa, ki napotuje na enotne kontaktne točke, ki so trenutno na voljo po direktivi o storitvah; je prepričan, da bodo imeli strokovnjaki tako na voljo javni vmesnik v svojem jeziku, kjer bodo lahko nalagali dokumente, dostopali do poklicne izkaznice in jo natisnili ter se seznanjali z najnovejšimi informacijami o postopku priznavanja, vključno z upravnimi informacijami o pristojnih organih, strokovnih telesih in dokumentih, ki jih je treba predložiti;
Calls on the Commission to coordinate and consolidate the various sources of information currently available on issues relating to the recognition of professional qualifications – including National Contact Points (NCPs) and professional bodies – with the Your Europe portal, which signposts the single points of contact currently available under the Services Directive; argues that this will provide professionals, in their own language, with a public interface where they can upload documents, access and print their professional card, and obtain up-to-date information on the recognition process, and administrative information on competent authorities, professional bodies and the documents to be submitted;
meni, da je treba okrepiti dialog in izmenjavo informacij v posameznih poklicih ter izboljšati sodelovanje med pristojnimi organi in nacionalnimi kontaktnimi točkami na nacionalni ravni ter med državami članicami; poziva Komisijo, naj podpre nastanek mrež pristojnih organov in strokovnih teles za najbolj mobilne poklice, da bi si ti izmenjevali splošne informacije o nacionalnih postopkih in zahtevah glede izobrazbe in najboljši praksi ter raziskali možnosti za tesnejše sodelovanje, kot so skupne platforme; meni, da morajo javni organi in socialni partnerji sodelovati v strukturiranem dialogu o izboljšanju poklicnega vključevanja mladih;
Argues that dialogue and exchanges of information within each individual profession must be enhanced, and that cooperation between the competent authorities and NCPs must be improved, at both national and intra-Member State level; calls on the Commission to facilitate networks of competent authorities and professional bodies for the most mobile professions, to exchange general information about national processes and education requirements, and to share best practice and investigate possibilities for deeper cooperation, such as common platforms; considers that public authorities and the social partners must engage in a structured dialogue on how to enhance the professional integration of young people;
poziva države članice, naj izboljšajo učinkovitost javnih organov pri širjenju informacij o pravicah delavcev in postopkih priznavanja poklicnih kvalifikacij, da bi pri spodbujanju mobilnosti omejile odvračilni učinek, ki ga ima birokracija;
Calls on the Member States to improve the efficiency of public authorities in providing information both about workers' rights and about procedures for the recognition of professional qualifications, thereby reducing the deterrent effect of bureaucracy, as part of measures to boost mobility;
zato poziva države članice, naj uporabljajo sodobne komunikacijske tehnologije, vključno s podatkovnimi zbirkami in postopki za spletno registracijo, da bi zagotovile upoštevanje rokov, določenih v splošnem sistemu za priznavanje kvalifikacij, in dosegle bistvene izboljšave z vidika dostopa do informacij in poznavanja postopkov;
Calls on the Member States, therefore, to use modern communication technologies, including databases and online registration procedures, to ensure that the deadlines set under the general recognition system are met and that significant improvements are made in terms of access to information and knowledge of procedures;
poziva k obvezni obveznosti pristojnih organov, da vsem drugim pristojnim organom v nekem poklicu zagotavljajo najnovejše kontaktne podatke;
Calls for a mandatory obligation for competent authorities to provide up-to-date contact information to all other competent authorities in their given profession;
poziva Komisijo, naj določi smernice glede obdobja, v katerem lahko posameznik, ki je predložil popoln dosje, pričakuje odločitev pristojnega organa; skrajšanje tega roka z večjo uporabo informacijskega sistema za notranji trg in optimizacijo postopkov bi olajšalo tudi mobilnost; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo dovolj sredstev za zagotavljanje poklicnega priznavanja v primernem roku;
Calls on the Commission to set guidelines regarding the time period within which an individual who has submitted a complete dossier should expect a decision from the competent authority; reducing this time period through greater use of IMI and optimising procedures would also facilitate mobility; calls on the Member States to provide sufficient resources to ensure professional recognition within a reasonable time period;