ugotavlja, da bi morala biti EU sposobna prilagoditi in reformirati notranje strukture upravljanja, da bi proces odločanja odražal pluralnost znotraj EU in omogočal doseganje konsenza; poudarja, da se mora usklajen zunanjepolitični pristop na ravni EU v odnosih z državami BRICS in drugimi državami v vzponu kazati tudi v organizaciji Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje; je prepričan, da bi morala Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje v tesnem sodelovanju s Parlamentom pregledati in okrepiti strateška partnerstva s posameznimi državami BRICS ter izkoristiti njihove posebnosti in možnosti za sinergije v sodelovanju z EU; poziva Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj razvije mehanizme za horizontalno in vertikalno usklajevanje, ki bodo zunanji politiki EU omogočili izrabo institucionalnih sinergij EU ter gostote in globine dvostranskih vezi držav članic s strateškimi partnerji, vključno z državami BRICS in drugimi državami v vzponu; meni, da mora Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje poleg tega, da delo organizira za posamezne geografske in tematske sklope, v primeru držav BRICS oblikovati priložnostni mehanizem za usklajevanje, da bi zagotovila, da so vse posamezne politike v zvezi z z državami BRICS s sistemskega vidika združljive in da se sprejete politične usmeritve kažejo tudi v dialogu EU z razvitimi državami, kot so Združene države Amerike, Kanada in Japonska; meni, da bi morale delegacije EU v državah BRICS in drugih pomembnih državah v vzponu tesneje sodelovati, da bi zagotovile nenehno spremljanje in analizo medsebojnih odnosov med Brazilijo, Rusijo, Indijo, Kitajsko in Južno Afriko ter pomembne teme v skupnem interesu, da bi lahko razvili bolj sistematičen pristop; meni, da bi se morale delegacije EU osredotočiti na analize stališč držav BRICS v zvezi z upravljanjem in svetovnimi izzivi ter na njihove odnose z drugimi državami te skupine; meni, da bi morala EU svoje vire in prizadevanja znova usmeriti v vodenje reforme svetovnega reda in mednarodnih organizacij, zlasti reforme Varnostnega sveta ZN in svetovnega finančnega multilateralizma, da bi oblikovali bolj vključujoč proces odločanja in doseganja konsenza na svetovni ravni;
Notes that the EU should have capacity to adjust and reform its internal governance structures in order to ensure a decision-making process able to reflect its plurality and create consensus; stresses the importance that a coherent foreign policy approach at EU level towards the BRICS and other emerging countries be reflected in the functioning of the EEAS; believes that the EEAS should review and strengthen strategic partnerships with individual BRICS countries, in close consultation with Parliament, exploiting their specificities and the potential for synergies and cooperation with the EU; urges the EEAS to devise horizontal and vertical coordination mechanisms that will enable EU foreign policy to benefit from EU institutional synergies and from the density and depth of Member States' bilateral ties with strategic partners, including the BRICS and other emerging powers; takes the view that, with regard to the BRICS, in addition to its organisation along geographical and thematic lines, the EEAS should establish an ad hoc coordinating mechanism to ensure that all individual policies towards the BRICS are compatible from a systemic point of view and that the policy lines adopted are reflected in the EU dialogue with emerged powers such as the USA, Canada and Japan; believes that the EU delegations in BRICS countries and other relevant emerging powers should liaise more closely with one another in order to ensure continuous monitoring and analysis on relations amongst the BRICS and relevant cross-sensitivities, thus enabling a more systemic approach; takes the view in this regard that EU Delegations in BRICS countries should analyse the positions of BRICS countries on governance and global challenges and on relations with other BRICS countries; believes that the EU should direct renewed efforts and resources to leading the reform process of a global system of governance and of international organisations with a view to ensuring a more inclusive consensus-building and decision-making process at global level, in particular the reform of the UN Security Council and global financial multilateralism;