natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker sta preglednost in odgovornost temeljna pogoja za učinkovitost pomoči, ne le med donatorji in vladami prejemnicami, temveč tudi med državo in družbo; ker so se donatorji in partnerske države v agendi za ukrepanje iz Akre dogovorili, da bodo pravočasno razkrili podrobne informacije o sedanjih in prihodnjih pretokih pomoči, da se državam v razvoju omogočita natančnejša priprava proračuna in izvajanje revizij; ker je za države donatorke bistvenega pomena tudi, da podprejo krepitev institucije parlamenta ter udeležbe lokalnih oblasti in organizacij civilne družbe, da bi razvojno politiko trdno zasidrali v demokratičnem procesu;
whereas transparency and accountability – both between the governments of donor and recipient countries and between the state and society – are prerequisites for aid effectiveness; whereas donors and partner countries agreed in the AAA to provide detailed information on current and future aid flows in good time to enable developing countries to draw up their budgets and audit their accounts more accurately; whereas, likewise, it remains crucial for donor countries to support the strengthening of the institution of parliament and the involvement of local authorities and civil society organisations, so as to anchor development policy firmly in the democratic process;
ker Unija in države članice na svetovni ravni prispevajo več kot polovico uradne razvojne pomoči in ker imajo zato pomembno vlogo v agendi učinkovitosti pomoči;
whereas the EU and its Member States contribute more than half of global ODA and therefore play an important role in the aid effectiveness programme;
ker je z vidika četrtega foruma pomembno spomniti države donatorke na zavezo, da bodo do leta 2015 namenile 0,7 % BNP/BND razvojni pomoči, da bodo vključile pomembno načelo enakosti med moškimi in ženskami v vse politike in prakse svojih odnosov z državami v razvoju, strožje opredelile URP in upoštevale še vedno veljavna načela agende za ukrepanje iz Akre; ker je treba preseči okvire uradne razvojne pomoči in zgraditi razvojna partnerstva, ki bodo podprla vizijo razvoja, katerega nosilke in gonilo so države same;
whereas it is important, in the run-up to the fourth Forum, to remind donor countries of their commitment to devote 0.7% of their GNP/GNI to development aid by 2015, to include a significant gender equality component in all policies and practices in the context of their relations with developing countries, to define ODA more rigorously and to uphold the principles laid down in the AAA, which remain valid, and whereas there is a need to move beyond ODA in order to build partnerships aimed at supporting the emergence of a vision of development that is owned and driven by the countries themselves;
ker se področje uporabe razvojne pomoči neprestano spreminja in ker bi se pojav novih donatorjev moral boljše kazati v mehanizmih za učinkovitost pomoči;
whereas the development aid landscape is constantly evolving, and whereas aid effectiveness mechanisms should better reflect the emergence of new donors;
ker morajo vse oblike financiranja, tudi inovativni mehanizmi financiranja, kot so davek na finančne transakcije in svetovni skladi za zdravje in izobraževanje, utelešati in izvajati načela Pariške deklaracije;
whereas all forms of development funding, including innovative financing mechanisms such as the financial transaction tax and the global funds for health and education, must embody and put into practice the principles of the Paris Declaration;
ker soglasje iz Tunisa o afriški razvojni agendi poziva k osredotočenju na širšo agendo razvojne učinkovitosti namesto zgolj na učinkovitost pomoči; ker je v soglasju opredeljenih naslednjih šest elementov, ki so bistveni za razvojno učinkovitost v Afriki: gradnja zmogljivih držav, razvoj demokratične odgovornosti, spodbujanje sodelovanja jug-jug, regionalno razmišljanje in delovanje, sprejemanje novih razvojnih partnerjev in premagovanje odvisnosti od pomoči;
whereas the Tunis Consensus, an African agenda for development, calls for attention to be refocused from aid effectiveness to the broader agenda of development effectiveness; whereas the six elements identified as being crucial for Africa in terms of development effectiveness are: building capable states, developing democratic accountability, promoting South-South cooperation, thinking and acting regionally, embracing new development partners, and outgrowing aid dependence;
poudarja potrebo po ambicioznem stališču Unije na FVR-4, ki bi lahko pomembno prispevalo k poglabljanju in polnemu izvajanju zavez glede učinkovitosti pomoči; glede na pomembnost učinkovitosti pomoči za izboljšanje življenjske ravni in zmanjšanje revščine v državah prejemnicah ter za uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja upa na zastopanost Evropske unije na visoki ravni v Busanu;
Stresses the need for the EU to adopt an ambitious position at HLF-4 with a view to making a substantial contribution to deepening and fully implementing its aid effectiveness commitments; hopes, in view of the importance of aid effectiveness in terms of improving quality of life, reducing poverty in recipient countries and achieving the MDGs, that the EU will send high-level representatives to Busan;
opominja, da je eden glavnih pogojev za uresničitev agende za učinkovitost pomoči polno sprejetje načela „demokratične odgovornosti“, po katerem je država nosilka razvojne strategije, v kateri se odraža zavezanost vseh nacionalnih zainteresiranih strani;
Points out that one of the prerequisites in order to fulfil the ‘aid effectiveness agenda’ is to embrace fully the principle of ‘democratic ownership’, which means that development strategies must be driven by the countries themselves and reflect a commitment on the part of all national stakeholders;
ugotavlja, da vlade v državah v razvoju svojim parlamentom in civilni družbi niso dale dovolj prostora, da bi jim omogočile dejanski prevzem odgovornosti; poziva EU, naj okrepi zaveze iz Pariza in Akre s spodbujanjem demokratične odgovornosti za razvojne politike, načrtovanje in dejanja prek polne udeležbe in upoštevanja vseh zainteresiranih strani v razvojnem procesu;
Notes that the governments of developing countries have not left their parliaments and civil societies the necessary room for manoeuvre to allow genuine ownership; urges the EU to strengthen the commitments set out in the Paris Declaration and the AAA by promoting democratic ownership of development policies, planning and measures through full engagement with, and accountability to, all development stakeholders;
meni, da bo FVR-4 uspešen, če se bo končal z močno zavezo za učinkovitost pomoči, razvidno iz jasnih in merljivih ciljev, ki so jim priloženi podrobni časovni okviri njihovega uresničevanja; se zaveda pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju Pariške deklaracije in agende za ukrepanje iz Akre ter poudarja pomen razvoja „lastništva“ po pristopu od spodaj navzgor, nerazdrobljenosti pomoči ter oblikovanja močnih, učinkovitih in neodvisnih mehanizmov za naknadno izvrševanje, v katerih bodo sodelovali parlamenti in civilna družba na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni; ob tem meni, da bi bilo treba pomoč, če naj bo učinkovita, obravnavati in oceniti glede na konkreten prispevek pri doseganju razvojnih ciljev in ne glede na vložek;
Believes that HLF-4 will be a success if it results in a strong commitment to aid effectiveness, reflected in clear and measureable objectives with a precise timetable for their realisation; mindful of the implementation deficits of the Paris Declaration and AAA, underlines the importance of development ‘ownership’ following a bottom-up approach, of non-fragmentation of aid and, as well as of setting up strong, effective and independent follow-up enforcement mechanisms, involving parliaments and civil society at both national and international level; takes the view that, if it is to be effective, aid should be considered and evaluated in terms of its concrete contribution towards achieving development goals and not only in term of inputs;
opominja, da učinkovita pomoč pomeni, da se revnim državam omogoči mobilizacija domačih virov prihodkov; v zvezi s tem znova poziva EU, naj se prednostno posveti boju proti davčnim oazam in davčnim utajam, hkrati pa spodbuja alternativne vire za financiranje razvoja, tj. z določitvijo davka na finančne transakcije; EU poziva tudi, naj državam v razvoju zagotovi okrepljeno podporo pri davčnih reformah, da bi podprli delujoče, učinkovite, pravične in trajnostne davčne sisteme, ki bi morali voditi v zmanjševanje revščine in odvisnosti od pomoči;
Points out that aid effectiveness requires poor countries to be able to mobilise domestic revenues; urges the EU once again, therefore, to make the fight against tax havens and tax evasion its utmost priority, while also promoting alternative sources of development finance, for example through the introduction of a financial transaction tax; likewise, urges the EU to give developing countries more help with tax reforms, thereby supporting the establishment of effective, efficient, fair and sustainable tax systems, which should have the effect of reducing poverty and aid dependency;
poziva države donatorke in države upravičenke, naj sprejmejo takojšnje ukrepe za upoštevanje zavez iz Pariške deklaracije in agende za ukrepanje iz Akre, ki jih ovirata zgolj politična volja in birokracija ter visoki transakcijski stroški, na primer pri sprostitvi pomoči, predvidljivosti pomoči, pogojih in preglednosti; ter poudarja, da je treba uresničiti zaveze iz Akre, in sicer da morajo donatorji v dvostranskem sodelovanju med vladami kot prvo možnost izrabiti državne sisteme ter se lotiti vprašanja nepredvidljivih tokov pomoči; prav tako poziva države donatorke, naj se osredotočijo na lokalne in regionalne trge;
Calls on donor and recipient countries to take immediate action to honour their commitments under the Paris Declaration and the AAA, the only obstacles to which are political will, bureaucracy and high transaction costs, for instance as regards the untying of aid, aid predictability, conditionality and transparency; emphasises, in particular, the need to put into practice the commitment made in the AAA whereby, in the context of bilateral cooperation between governments, donors undertake to draw first and foremost on their national systems, and to make aid flows more predictable; also urges donor countries to give priority to local and regional public procurement;
opozarja na vlogo pomoči kot vzvoda za spodbujanje vključujoče in trajnostne rasti za zmanjšanje revščine in odvisnosti od pomoči ter izboljšanje ustvarjanja novih delovnih mest, v katerem se upoštevajo posebnosti vsake države in ki obenem zagotavlja učinkovitejšo pomoč v tistih državah, ki jo najbolj potrebujejo; opozarja tudi, da bi bilo treba pomoč obravnavati kot začasen ukrep z namenom spodbuditi samostojno rast v državah v razvoju namesto kot dolgoročno rešitev;
Points out that aid should serve as a lever for inclusive, sustainable growth in order to reduce poverty and aid dependency and facilitate job creation, taking into account the individual characteristics of each country while strengthening aid effectiveness in those countries whose need is greatest; also notes that aid should be regarded as a temporary measure aimed at fostering self-sustainable growth in developing countries, rather than as a long-term solution;
8 poudarja, da prakse donatorjev v zvezi s preskrbo ovirajo takšno rast, saj zanemarjajo lokalno gospodarstvo; zato poziva donatorje, naj dajo prednost domači in regionalni preskrbi ter tako okrepijo lokalne gospodarske zmogljivosti; 9.
8 Stresses that such growth is being hampered by certain procurement practices on the part of donors, which disregard the local economy; urges donors, therefore, to give preference to local and regional procurement, thereby enhancing local economic performance; 9.
opozarja, da razvojna pomoč ne zadošča za izkoreninjenje revščine ter da bi morala biti usmerjena bolj v razloge kot pa v kazalnike revščine; poudarja, da je nujna učinkovitejša pomoč, ki naj v državah prejemnicah pomaga ustvariti trdno gospodarstvo, prijazno do okolja, kjer bodo osnovne socialne storitve zagotovljene za vse državljane in ki bo sčasoma sposobno zmanjšati odvisnost od pomoči; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je pomembna vzpostavitev takega vzdušja, ki bo v državah prejemnicah spodbujalo nastanek spodobnih delovnih mest, podjetij in inovacij; spodbuja donatorje, naj najprej izkoristijo možnosti, ki jih daje lokalno gospodarstvo, ter naj se dejansko trudijo, da ga bodo okrepili;
Points out that development aid is not in itself enough to eradicate poverty and that it should address its causes, rather than its symptoms; emphasizes the need for more effective aid as part of a development process which seeks to create, in recipient countries, strong, environmentally friendly economies in which access to basic social services is guaranteed for everyone and, ultimately, to reduce dependence on aid; stresses, in that connection, the importance of creating a climate conducive to decent work creation, entrepreneurship and innovation in recipient countries; encourages donors to exploit local economic capacities as a matter of priority and to take active steps to strengthen them;
poziva k boljšemu mednarodnemu usklajevanju delitve pomoči med državami, ker se pojavlja problem privilegiranih držav in držav, ki ne prejemajo pomoči; poudarja, da se zaradi prizadevanj za povečanje učinka pomoči in za doseganje več rezultatov oziroma vrednosti za ta sredstva ne bi smeli izogibati tveganju v razvojni politiki in se osredotočati samo na „lahke države“; vztraja, da mora izkoreninjenje revščine ostati odločilno merilo pri dodeljevanju razvojne pomoči EU;
Calls for more effective international coordination of cross-country aid distribution in order to address the problem of ‘aid darlings’ and ‘aid orphans’; stresses that the aim to increase the impact of aid and to get more results/value for money should not lead to a risk-averse development policy which only focuses on ‘easy countries’; insists that poverty eradication and needs must remain the crucial criteria for the allocation of development aid;
poudarja, da je za učinkovitost pomoči pomemben različen pristop, ob upoštevanju ravni razvoja držav prejemnic (najmanj razvite, krhke in države s srednje visokim dohodkom) ter njihovih posebnih potreb; poudarja, da je treba glede na visoko število nestabilnih držav in glede na dejstvo, da te države najbolj zaostajajo za razvojnimi cilji tisočletja, saj predstavljajo 75 % vsega primanjkljaja, temu vprašanju nameniti posebno pozornost;
Underlines the importance of a differentiated approach to aid effectiveness, taking into account the level of development of the receiving countries (least developed, fragile and middle-income) and their specific needs; highlights that, given the high number of fragile states and the fact that they are the furthest away from achieving the MDGs, accounting for 75 % of the deficit, it is important that special attention is given to this issue;
poudarja, da je udeležba lokalnih oblasti in organizacij civilne družbe v razvojnih politikah nujna za izpolnitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja in zagotavljanje dobrega upravljanja; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da se številne organizacije civilne družbe kljub temu, da so bile v Akri priznane kot „zaslužni razvojni akterji“, soočajo s politikami in praksami, ki spodkopavajo njihovo vlogo v pospeševanju razvoja; širše opozarja donatorje in partnerske države, naj večjo pozornost namenijo sodelovanju parlamentov, lokalnih organov in civilne družbe, preglednejšo uporabo nacionalnih sistemov;
Stresses that the involvement of local authorities and civil society organisations in development policies is essential in order to achieve the MDGs and ensure good governance; notes that, although the AAA recognises them as ‘development actors in their own right’, many civil society organisations are faced with policies and practices that are undermining their role as development actors; calls, more broadly, on donors and partner countries to place the emphasis on greater recognition of the involvement of parliaments, local authorities and civil society, and on more transparent use of national systems;
opozarja, da finančna pomoč ne zadošča za zagotavljanje trajnega razvoja ter da se morajo lokalne vlade in domači zasebni sektor potruditi za uresničitev projektov v okviru razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; poudarja vlogo zasebnih podjetij, kot so mlada in srednja podjetja, pri ustvarjanju bogastva ter odgovornost držav pri zagotavljanju stabilnosti in pravne države; vztraja, da je v državah prejemnicah pomembno dobro upravljanje;
Points out that financial aid is not in itself enough to guarantee sustainable development and that local government and the domestic private sector must play a major part in implementing MDG-related projects; emphasises the role played by private undertakings, such as small and medium enterprises, in wealth creation and the responsibility of States to guarantee stability and the rule of law; stresses, in that connection, the importance of good governance in recipient countries;
poudarja, da je treba razpravljati tudi o kazalnikih dobrega upravljanja, pri čemer so nekateri še vedno zelo sporni, zaradi uporabnosti pri določanju kakovosti participativnih pristopov, potrebnih za demokratično prevzemanje odgovornosti;
Stresses that indicators of good governance – some of which remain highly controversial – should also be the subject of debate, given their value in determining the quality of the participatory approaches necessary for democratic ownership;
poziva partnerske vlade, naj upoštevajo in poudarijo prizadevanja za decentralizacijo (politično, upravno in davčno) ter okrepijo usklajevanje med lokalnimi in nacionalnimi postopki razvojnega načrtovanja, pri tem pa prispevajo k dopolnjevanju in specializaciji ter ustrezno upoštevajo lokalno samoupravo;
Calls on partner governments to value and step up efforts towards decentralisation (political, administrative and fiscal) and to enhance coordination between local and national development planning processes by contributing to complementarity and specialisation, with due regard for local autonomy;
poziva države donatorke k boljšemu usklajevanju ukrepov in poenostavitvi postopkov ter k tesnejšemu sodelovanju z zasebnimi donatorji;
Calls on donor countries to coordinate and harmonise their efforts more effectively, to streamline their procedures and to work towards closer cooperation with private donors;
opozarja, da je treba sodelovanje jug–jug in tristranske pobude spodbujati in promovirati kot oblike pomoči, s katero se bodo izboljšale kakovost in učinkovitost, izmenjava znanja ter izgradnja zmogljivosti;
Urges that South-South and triangular cooperation be encouraged and promoted as forms of aid that help to improve quality and effectiveness and contribute to the exchange of knowledge and to capacity-building;
opominja, da vse vlade – tako donatorke kot prejemnice – zavezujejo človekove pravice; poudarja, da je spoštovanje teh zavez in mednarodnega prava na področju človekovih pravic ključno za učinkovitost pomoči; skladno s tem poziva EU, naj se v Busanu zaveže, da bo sprejela obvezujoče ukrepe, s katerimi bo zagotovila, da je pomoč skladna s konvencijami o človekovih pravicah;
Points out that all governments – donor and recipient – are bound by human rights obligations; stresses that these commitments, along with accountability under international human rights law, are crucial in order to ensure effective development; urges the EU, therefore, to advocate in Busan for the introduction of binding measures which will ensure that aid provision complies with human rights agreements;
poudarja, da je pomembno doseči ravnovesje med uresničevanjem nekaterih političnih in davčnih pogojev ter pristopi, usmerjenimi v kazalnike uspešnosti, da stroge politične zahteve in zahteve, povezane z uspešnostjo, ne bi vlad partnerskih držav odvrnile od izvajanja lastnih politik ali celo preskušanja novih in bolj tveganih pristopov, ampak da bi raje sledile zahtevam donatorjev;
Stresses the importance of striking a balance between the need to meet certain political and tax conditions and approaches based on performance indicators, so as to ensure that strict political and performance requirements do not deter partner country governments from implementing their own policies – and even experimenting with new, more adventurous approaches – rather than simply following donors' prescriptions;
pozdravlja sprejetje Kodeksa ravnanja Evropske unije o delitvi dela v okviru razvojne politike in poudarja, da se doslej ta načela niso v celoti izvajala, ker ni bilo politične volje, kar ovira optimalno uporabo evropske pomoči, pa tudi možnost Unije, da igra vodilno vlogo pri delitvi dela v okviru četrtega foruma;
Welcomes the adoption of the EU Code of Conduct on the Division of Labour in Development Policy and stresses that its principles have not been fully implemented to date owing to a lack of political will, which is preventing optimum use of European aid and undermining the EU's ability to be a driving force in the division of labour in the context of the fourth Forum;
poziva Evropsko unijo, naj pospeši pobudo „Fast Track“ v zvezi z delitvijo dela, zlasti z izvajanjem koncentracije po sektorjih, postopkom reorganizacije in skupnim oblikovanjem programov, ter spodbuja uporabo nacionalnih sistemov za udejanjanje zaveze, sprejete v okviru Pariške deklaracije, o večji uporabi podrobnih pravil o razdeljevanju pomoči, ki temeljijo na prevzemanju odgovornosti, zlasti prek finančne podpore;
Calls on the EU to speed up the Fast Track Initiative on Division of Labour – in particular as regards concentration by sector – by means of reorganisation and joint programming, and to encourage the use of national systems in an effort to fulfil the undertaking given in the Paris Declaration to make greater use of aid delivery mechanisms based on ownership, inter alia through budget support;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije iz zelene knjige o proračunski podpori, katere namen je predvsem spodbuditi endogeni razvoj partnerskih držav, ter poziva, naj se natančno določijo merila za upravičenost do proračunske pomoči, da se z upoštevanjem dejavnikov, kot je stopnja korupcije v državi, preprečijo morebitne zlorabe ali slaba uporaba tovrstne pomoči,
Welcomes the Commission initiative outlined in the Green Paper on budget support, which seeks primarily to promote local development in partner countries, and calls for budget support eligibility criteria to be tightened up so as to prevent departures from agreed approaches and the misuse of this type of aid, with due account being taken of factors such as a country's corruption index rating;
poudarja vlogo nacionalnih parlamentov v okviru novega sistema pomoči in opozarja na to, da jim je treba pomagati pri krepitvi njihove zakonodajne zmogljivosti in spodbuditi nujne spremembe, da bi lahko preučili vse stroške, ki zadevajo razvoj;
Stresses the leading role of national parliaments in the new aid architecture, and the need to help them boost their law-making capacity and promote the necessary changes to enable them to scrutinise all development-related expenditure;
zahteva, naj nacionalni parlamenti sprejmejo strateške dokumente po državah in letni proračun ob posvetovanju s civilno družbo in lokalnimi organi pred političnim dialogom z donatorji, da bi demokratičnemu nadzoru dali polno veljavo;
Calls on national parliaments to adopt country strategy documents and annual budgets in consultation with civil society and local authorities in advance of any political dialogue with donors, so as to give full weight to democratic scrutiny;
zato opozarja na zavezo znotraj operativnega okvira Sveta Evropske unije za učinkovitost pomoči Generalni sekretariat Sveta Evropske unije, prečiščeno besedilo št. 18239/10.
Recalls, in this connection, the undertaking given in the Operational Framework on Aid Effectiveness General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, Consolidated Text 18239/10.