natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je trenutno hudo pomanjkanje hrane v Afriškem rogu tudi tragična posledica nedoseženih skladnosti in dopolnjevanja mednarodne humanitarne in razvojne pomoči; poudarja, da je v nasprotju z naravnimi nesrečami to pomanjkanje nastopilo počasi in se je postopno stopnjevalo v humanitarno nesrečo; opozarja, da so suše in pomanjkanje hrane v Afriškem rogu žal kronične; obžaluje dejstvo, da kljub takšni stvarnosti in veliki količini razvojne pomoči, ki se je v minulih desetletjih stekla v to regijo, ni vidnih rezultatov v smislu krepitve samozadostnosti lokalnih kmetov in s tem zagotavljanja trajnosti;
Believes that the current acute food crisis in the Horn of Africa is also the tragic consequence of a lack of coherence and complementarity in international humanitarian and development aid; points out that, unlike natural disasters, this has been a slow-onset crisis that has gradually escalated into a humanitarian disaster; recalls that, unfortunately, droughts and food shortages have taken on a chronic character in the Horn of Africa; deplores the fact that, despite this reality and the vast amount of development assistance that has flowed into the region over the past decades, there are no visible results in terms of strengthening the self-sufficiency of local farmers and thus ensuring sustainability;
Haiti in Pakistan
Haiti and Pakistan
obžaluje, da se bomo leta 2010 spominjali po dveh velikih nesrečah: po uničujočem potresu na Haitiju, ki mu je sledila epidemija kolere, in po poplavah v Pakistanu, kakršnih še ni bilo;
Regrets that 2010 will be remembered as the year of two mega disasters: the devastating earthquake in Haiti, followed by a cholera epidemic, and the unprecedented floods in Pakistan;
ugotavlja, da je GD ECHO v letu 2010 za Haiti namenil 122 milijonov EUR in za Pakistan 150 milijonov EUR ter da je bil znesek humanitarne pomoči za Pakistan največje posredovanje, izvedeno v enem letu;
Notes that in 2010 ECHO allocated EUR 122 million to Haiti and EUR 150 million to Pakistan, and that the humanitarian assistance allocated to Pakistan by ECHO was the largest intervention ever conducted in one year;
priznava, da so bili zaradi obsega nesreč in neločljivo povezanih težav, vključno s fizičnim dostopom in varnostnimi vprašanji, razmere izjemno zahtevne; poudarja, da so se pri obeh nesrečah pokazale podobne težave;
Recognises that the scale of the disasters and the inherent difficulties, including physical access and security concerns, made the conditions extremely complex; points out that both disasters brought similar problems to light;
poudarja, da je učinkovito mednarodno usklajevanje nujni pogoj za učinkovitost in uspešnost humanitarne pomoči, ter priznava dodano vrednost in nujnost delovanja pod okriljem Urada ZN za usklajevanje humanitarnih zadev med operacijami humanitarne pomoči (OCHA);
Points out that efficient international coordination is an essential prerequisite for efficient and effective humanitarian assistance, recognises the added value of operating – as well as the need to operate – under the umbrella of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) during humanitarian aid operations;
ugotavlja, da Komisija Uradu ZN za usklajevanje humanitarnih zadev zagotavlja veliko podporo; obžaluje dejstvo, da so izkušnje na Haitiju in v Pakistanu pokazale na trenutno nezadostno sposobnost usklajevanja Urada ZN za usklajevanje humanitarnih zadev; poudarja, da so sposobnost Urada ZN za usklajevanje humanitarnih zadev pri uresničevanju nalog usklajevanja ovirali majhna zmogljivost, neustrezna ocena potreb in le delno funkcionalna elektronska orodja, potrebna za obdelavo informacij;
Notes that the Commission provides the OCHA with significant support; deplores the fact that the experience in Haiti and Pakistan highlighted the currently insufficient coordinating ability of the OCHA; stresses that the OCHA's ability to fulfil its coordinating role was undermined by low capacity, inadequate needs assessment and only partially functional electronic tools for processing the information;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija zagotovila znatno podporo ZN pri njihovih prizadevanjih za razvoj in izvajanje področnega sistema; poudarja, da se je pri obeh nesrečah pokazalo, da je treba opraviti še veliko dela, da bi izboljšali njegovo uspešnost, učinkovitost in usklajevanje ter okrepili lastništvo in odgovornost;
Notes that the Commission has provided the UN with significant support in its efforts to develop and implement the cluster system; stresses that both disasters revealed that there is still much work to be done to improve its effectiveness, efficiency and coordination and to reinforce ownership and accountability;
poudarja, da Komisija poročevalcu Parlamenta ni poslala končnega opisnega in finančnega poročila partnerjev GD ECHO o izvajanju humanitarnih dejavnosti po nesrečah na Haitiju in v Pakistanu leta 2010 z utemeljitvijo, da ta poročila vsebujejo občutljive informacije o partnerjih GD ECHO; poudarja, da mora imeti Parlament dostop do takih poročil ali vsaj do glavnih dejstev o učinkovitosti in uspešnosti izvajanja dejavnosti, da lahko presoja o njihovem dobrem finančnem poslovodenju;
Points out that the Commission did not provide Parliament's rapporteur with the final narrative and financial reports of the ECHO partners on the implementation of humanitarian actions in the aftermath of the catastrophes in Haiti and Pakistan in 2010, on the grounds that they included sensitive information on ECHO partners; stresses that Parliament must have access to such reports, or at least to the main facts about the efficiency and effectiveness of the implementation of actions, in order to be able to judge as to their sound financial management;
poudarja, da bo Odbor za proračunski nadzor zaradi težav, o katerih je bilo poročano v zvezi s pomočjo za Haiti, v to državo poslal delegacijo;
Points out that the Committee on Budgetary Control will send a delegation to Haiti in light of the problems reported in connection with the aid allocated to Haiti;
poziva Komisijo, naj z ZN povezana vprašanja postavi ustreznim organom ZN;
Calls on the Commission to raise the matters relating to the UN with the relevant UN bodies;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. februarja 2012 o usklajenem evropskem pristopu h kolektivnim tožbam naproti ( 2011/2089(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 2 February 2012 on ‘Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress’ ( 2011/2089(INI) )
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 14. februarja 2011 z naslovom Javno posvetovanje: Usklajenemu pristopu h kolektivnim pravnim sredstvom naproti ( SEC(2011)0173 ),
having regard to the Commission staff working document of 4 February 2011 entitled ‘Public Consultation: Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress’ ( SEC(2011)0173 ),
ob upoštevanju osnutka dokumenta o smernicah z naslovom Izračun škode v odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitev člena 101 ali 102, ki ga je Komisija objavila junija 2011,
having regard to the draft guidance paper entitled ‘Quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of Article 101 or 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union’, published by the Commission in June 2011,
ob upoštevanju dokumenta Komisije o posvetovanju glede nadaljnjih ukrepov v zvezi z zeleno knjigo o kolektivnih odškodninah za potrošnike (Bruselj, 2009),
having regard to the consultation paper for discussion on the follow-up to the Green Paper on consumer collective redress, published by the Commission in 2009,
ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 27. novembra 2008 o kolektivnih odškodninah za potrošnike ( COM(2008)0794 ),
having regard to the Commission Green Paper of 27 November 2008 on consumer collective redress ( COM(2008)0794 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. januarja 2011 o poročilu o politiki konkurence za leto 2009 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0023 .
having regard to its resolution of 20 January 2011 on the Report on Competition Policy 2009 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0023 .
ob upoštevanju bele knjige Komisije z dne 2. aprila 2008 o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES ( COM(2008)0165 ),
having regard to the Commission White Paper of 2 April 2008 on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules ( COM(2008)0165 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Maria Montija z dne 9. maja 2010 o novi strategiji za enotni trg,
having regard to the Monti report of 9 May 2010 on a new strategy for the single market,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 30. marca 2007 z naslovom „Strategija potrošniške politike EU 2007–2013: Usposabljanje potrošnikov, izboljševanje blaginje potrošnikov, učinkovito varstvo potrošnikov“ ( COM(2007)0099 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 13 March 2007 entitled ‘EU Consumer Policy Strategy 2007-2013: Empowering Consumers, Enhancing their Welfare, Effectively Protecting Them’ ( COM(2007)0099 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o alternativnem reševanju sporov v civilnih, gospodarskih in družinskih zadevah Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0449 .
having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2011 on alternative dispute resolution in civil, commercial and family matters Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0449 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. septembra 2011 o izvajanju direktive o mediaciji v državah članicah, njenem vplivu na mediacijo in sprejetju s strani sodišč Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0361 .
having regard to its resolution of 13 September 2011 on the implementation of the directive on mediation in the Member States, its impact on mediation and its take-up by the courts Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0361 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0012/2012 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0012/2012 ),
ker državljani in podjetja v evropskem območju pravice ne smejo le uživati pravic, temveč morajo imeti tudi možnost, da jih nemoteno in uspešno uveljavljajo;
whereas in the European area of justice, citizens and companies must not only enjoy rights but must also be able to enforce those rights effectively and efficiently;
ker je nedavno sprejeta zakonodaja EU napisana tako, da strankam v čezmejnih zadevah omogoča, da uspešno uveljavljajo svoje pravice Uredba (ES) št. 861/2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str.
whereas recently adopted EU legislation is designed to enable parties in cross-border situations either to enforce their rights effectively Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ L 199 , 31.7.2007, p.
1; Uredba (ES) št. 805/2004 o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov, UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str.
1); Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
ali da s pomočjo mediacije dosežejo izvensodno rešitev Direktiva 2008/52/ES o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, UL L 136, 24.5.2008, str.
or to seek out-of-court settlement by way of mediation Directive 2008/52/EC on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p.
ker koristim metode alternativnega reševanja sporov ni mogoče oporekati in ker bi moral biti vsem državljanom EU še naprej na voljo enakopraven dostop do sodnega varstva;
whereas the benefits of the alternative dispute resolution method are undisputed and fair access to justice should remain available to all EU citizens;
ker po raziskavi Flash Eurobarometer o odnosu potrošnikov do čezmejnega trgovanja in varstva potrošnikov iz marca 2011 79 % evropskih potrošnikov navaja, da bi bili bolj pripravljeni braniti svoje pravice na sodišču, če bi se lahko pridružili drugim potrošnikom, ki se pritožujejo o isti zadevi;
whereas, according to the Flash Eurobarometer on ‘Consumer attitudes towards cross-border trade and consumer protection’ published in March 2011, 79% of European consumers agree that they would be more willing to defend their rights in court if they could join other consumers complaining about the same issue;
ker oškodovani potrošniki, ki odškodnino zahtevajo individualno po sodni poti, pogosto naletijo na precejšnje ovire glede dostopnosti, učinkovitosti in cenovne dostopnosti, to pa zaradi včasih visokih sodnih stroškov, možnega psihološkega bremena, zapletenih in dolgotrajnih postopkov ter pomanjkljive obveščenosti o razpoložljivih pravnih sredstvih;
whereas consumers affected by a legal infringement who wish to pursue a court case in order to obtain redress on an individual basis often face significant barriers in terms of accessibility, effectiveness and affordability owing to sometimes high litigation costs, potential psychological costs, complex and lengthy procedures, and lack of information on the available means of redress;
ker v primeru, ko je zaradi iste kršitve oškodovana skupina državljanov, individualna tožba ni najučinkovitejše sredstvo za preprečitev nezakonitega ravnanja ali uveljavitev nadomestila, še zlasti, če je individualna škoda v primerjavi s sodnimi stroški majhna;
whereas, when a group of citizens are victims of the same infringement, individual lawsuits may not constitute an effective means of stopping unlawful practices or obtaining compensation, in particular if the individual loss is small in comparison with the litigation costs;
ker v nekaterih državah članicah splošna učinkovitost obstoječih pravnih sredstev za potrošniške in izvrševanje ustreznih predpisov na ravni EU velja za nezadovoljivo, ali pa ti mehanizmi niso dovolj dobro poznani, zaradi česar je njihova uporaba omejena;
whereas in some Member States the overall performance of the existing consumer redress and enforcement tools designed at EU level is not deemed satisfactory, or such mechanisms are not sufficiently well known, which results in their limited use;
ker je zaradi povezovanja evropskih trgov in posledično večje čezmejne dejavnosti očitneje, da je potreben skladen vseevropski pristop za obravnavo primerov, kjer potrošniki ostanejo praznih rok, saj postopki skupinske odškodninske tožbe, ki so jih uvedle številne države članice, ne prinašajo čezmejnih rešitev;
whereas the integration of European markets and the consequent increase in cross-border activities highlight the need for a coherent EU-wide approach to address cases where consumers are left empty-handed as the procedures for the collective claim of compensatory relief which have been introduced in a number of Member States do not provide for cross-border solutions;
ker igrajo nacionalne in evropske oblasti ključno vlogo pri izvrševanju zakonodaje EU, izvrševanje zakonodaje na zasebni ravni pa bi moralo javno izvrševanje dopolnjevati, ne more pa ga nadomestiti;
whereas national and European authorities play a pivotal role in the enforcement of EU law, and private enforcement should only supplement, but not replace, public enforcement;
ker javno izvrševanje predpisov, da se prepreči kršitve in naloži denarna kazen, samo po sebi potrošnikom ne zagotavlja odškodnine za škodo, ki so jo utrpeli;
whereas public enforcement to stop infringements and impose fines does not of itself enable consumers to be compensated for damage suffered;
ker bi združitev tožb v skupinsko tožbo ali možnost, da to tožbo vloži skupni zastopnik ali organ, ki deluje v javnem interesu, lahko poenostavila postopek in znižala stroške strank v postopku;
whereas bundling claims in a single collective redress procedure, or allowing such a claim to be brought by a representative entity or body acting in the public interest, could simplify the process and reduce costs for the parties involved;
ker lahko sistem, ki temelji na skupinskih tožbah, koristno dopolni individualno pravno varstvo, vendar ga ne more nadomestiti;
whereas a system based on collective legal actions can usefully supplement, but is no substitute for, individual legal protection;
ker mora Komisija pri vseh predlogih, ki ne sodijo v izključno pristojnost Unije, spoštovati načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti;
whereas the Commission must respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality with regard to any proposal that does not fall within the exclusive competence of the Union;
pozdravlja omenjeno horizontalno posvetovanje in poudarja, da morajo imeti žrtve nezakonitega ravnanja, in sicer tako državljani kot podjetja, možnost zahtevati odškodnino za izgubo ali škodo, ki so jo utrpeli, zlasti ko gre za razpršeno škodo, kjer tveganje glede višine stroškov ni sorazmerno s povzročeno škodo;
Welcomes the abovementioned horizontal consultation and stresses that victims of unlawful practices – citizens and companies alike – must be able to claim compensation for their individual loss or damage suffered, in particular in the case of scattered and dispersed damages, where the cost risk might not be proportionate to the damages suffered;
je seznanjen s prizadevanji vrhovnega sodišča Združenih držav Amerike, da omeji neresne pravdne postopke in zlorabo ameriškega sistema skupinskih tožb Wal-Mart Stores Inc. proti Dukes in drugi, 564 U.
Notes the efforts made by the US Supreme Court to limit frivolous litigation and abuse of the US class action system Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes et al.
ter poudarja, da se v Evropi ne sme uvesti sistema skupinskih tožb po ameriškem modelu oziroma drugih sistemov, ki ne upoštevajo evropske pravne tradicije;
, and stresses that Europe must refrain from introducing a US-style class action system or any system which does not respect European legal traditions;
pozdravlja prizadevanja držav članic, da bi okrepili pravice žrtev nezakonitega ravnanja z uvedbo ali načrtovanjem uvedbe zakonodaje, ki bi poenostavila odškodninske postopke, hkrati pa preprečevala zlorabo pravdnih postopkov, vendar se tudi zadeva, da se nacionalni mehanizmi kolektivnih pravnih sredstev med seboj močno razlikujejo, zlasti glede področja uporabe in postopkovnih značilnost, kar bo lahko imelo za posledico, da državljani ne bi mogli uživati svojih pravic;
Welcomes the efforts of Member States to strengthen the rights of victims of unlawful behaviour by introducing or planning to introduce legislation aimed at facilitating redress while avoiding an abusive litigation culture, but also recognises that national collective redress mechanisms are widely divergent, in particular in terms of scope and procedural characteristics, which may undermine the enjoyment of rights by citizens;
pozdravlja delo Komisije za usklajen evropski pristop h kolektivnim tožbam in jo poziva, naj v svoji oceni učinka pokaže, da je treba v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti ukrepati na ravni EU, da bi se izboljšalo veljavni regulativni okvir EU zato, da bi se žrtvam kršitev prava EU omogočilo, da dobijo odškodnino za utrpljeno škodo, s tem pa bi se prispevalo k zaupanju potrošnikov in boljšemu delovanju notranjega trga;
Welcomes the Commission's work towards a coherent European approach to collective redress and asks the Commission to demonstrate in its impact assessment that, pursuant to the principle of subsidiarity, action is needed at EU level in order to improve the current EU regulatory framework so as to allow victims of infringements of EU law to be compensated for the damage they sustain and thus contribute to consumer confidence and smoother functioning of the internal market;
poudarja možne prednosti kolektivnih tožb v obliki nižjih stroškov in večje pravne varnosti tožnikov, obtožencev in sodnega sistema, ki jih prinaša izogibanje vzporednim pravdnim postopkom za podobne tožbe;
Underlines the possible benefits of collective judicial actions in terms of lower costs and greater legal certainty for claimants, defendants and the judicial system alike by avoiding parallel litigation of similar claims;
meni, da je v sektorju konkurence javno izvrševanje bistveno za izvajanje določb Pogodb, za polno doseganje ciljev EU in zagotavljanje, da Komisija in nacionalni organi s področja konkurence izvršujejo konkurenčno pravo EU;
Believes, as regards the competition sector, that public enforcement is essential to implement the provisions of the Treaties, to fully achieve the goals of the EU and to ensure the enforcement of EU competition law by the Commission and national competition authorities;
želi spomniti, da trenutno samo države članice sprejemajo nacionalne predpise o določanju višine odškodnine; nadalje ugotavlja, da izvrševanje nacionalnega prava ne sme preprečiti enotnega izvrševanja evropskega prava;
Recalls that, currently, only Member States legislate on national rules for quantifying the amount of compensation that can be awarded; notes, furthermore, that the enforcement of national law must not prevent the uniform application of European law;
poziva Komisijo, naj dosledno preuči ustrezno pravno podlago za vse ukrepe s področja kolektivnih tožb;
Calls on the Commission to examine thoroughly the appropriate (legal basis for any measures in the field of collective redress;
ugotavlja, da po do sedaj dostopnih podatkih, zlasti glede na študijo z naslovom Ocena uspešnosti in učinkovitosti mehanizmov kolektivnih pravnih sredstev v Evropski uniji, opravljeno leta 2008 za GD SANCO, nobeden od obstoječih mehanizmov kolektivnih pravnih sredstev v EU ni povzročil nesorazmernih gospodarskih posledic za vpletena podjetja;
Notes that the information available to date, in particular a study carried out for DG SANCO in 2008 entitled ‘Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of collective redress mechanisms in the EU’, indicates that collective redress mechanisms available within the EU have not generated disproportionate economic consequences;
ugotavlja, da na ravni EU že obstajajo nekateri mehanizmi izvrševanja za posamezne primere, kot sta Direktiva 2008/52/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah in Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 805/2004 o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov in meni, da nudi zlasti Uredba št. 861/2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti s poenostavitvijo čezmejnih pravdnih postopkov pri zahtevkih za zneske, nižjih od 2000 evrov dostop do sodnega varstva, vendar ugotavlja, da ta zakonodaja ni zasnovana tako, da bi zagotavljala učinkovit dostop do sodnega varstva v primerih, ko veliko žrtev utrpi enako škodo;
Notes that some enforcement mechanisms for individual cases, such as Directive 2008/52/EC on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters and Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims, already exist at EU level and believes that, in particular, Regulation No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure provides access to justice by simplifying cross-border litigation and reducing costs in cases involving claims for a sum of less than EUR 2 000, but notes that this legislation is not designed to provide effective access to justice in cases where a large number of victims suffer similar damage;
ocenjuje, da bi sodna prepoved lahko igrala pomembno vlogo pri zaščiti pravic, ki jih državljani in podjetja uživajo v skladu s pravom EU, in meni, da je mogoče mehanizme, ki so bili uvedeni z Uredbo (ES) št. 2006/2004 o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov UL L 364, 9.12.2004, str.
Takes the view that injunctive relief also plays an important role in safeguarding rights which citizens and companies enjoy under EU law and believes that the mechanisms introduced under Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on consumer protection cooperation OJ L 364, 9.12.2004, p.
in Direktivo št. 2009/22/ES o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov, znatno izboljšati , da bi tako okrepili sodelovanje in sodne prepovedi v čezmejnih primerih;
, as well as Directive 2009/22/EC on injunctions for the protection of consumer interests can be significantly improved so as to foster cooperation and injunctive relief in cross-border situations;