natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da imajo evropska sredstva dodano vrednost tudi takrat, ko projekti, financirani na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, prispevajo k doseganju vseevropskih ciljev na področjih evropskega povezovanja, gospodarske rasti, raziskav, varstva okolja, kulture, upravljanja virov, športa, demografskih sprememb, trajnostne energetske oskrbe, socialne kohezije ali čezmejnega razvoja in tega ne bi bilo mogoče uresničiti brez evropskih spodbud;
Recognises, too, that European funding adds value where projects supported at national, regional and local level contribute to the achievement of pan-European objectives in the fields of European integration, economic growth, research, environmental protection, culture, resource management, sport, demographic change, sustainability of energy supply, social cohesion or cross-border development and this would not have been achieved without the European stimulus;
meni, da je uresničevanje evropskih ciljev z decentraliziranim pristopom ter načelom upravljanja na več ravneh in deljenega upravljanja ena od najpomembnejših prednosti kohezijske politike in s tem dodana vrednost sama po sebi; meni, da se z upravljanjem na več ravneh z jasno opredeljenimi strukturami in odgovornostmi uresničuje načelo subsidiarnosti ter primerno priznava pomen regionalnih organov pri izvajanju kohezijske politike; poziva k nadaljnji krepitvi načela partnerstva in občutka pripadnosti udeleženih strani s sprejetjem podrobnih zavezujočih določb v teritorialnem paktu, ki bi ga sprejela vsaka država članica, da se zagotovi načrtovanje in izvajanje, ki bo bolj usmerjeno v rezultate;
Sees the achievement of European objectives in accordance with a decentralised approach and the principle of multi-level governance and shared management as one of the major advantages of cohesion policy and thus as a form of added value in itself; considers multi-level governance with clearly-defined structures and responsibilities as an embodiment of the principle of subsidiarity as well as due recognition of the importance of regional authorities in implementing cohesion policy; calls for the partnership principle and the sense of ownership of the actors involved to be further strengthened by introducing detailed binding provisions in a Territorial Pact to be decided in each Member State, in order to ensure more result-oriented planning and implementation;
meni, da so preglednost v zvezi s kohezijsko politiko in njenim programskim ciklom, razporejanje odhodkov in dostop morebitnih upravičencev do sredstev iz strukturnih skladov do informacij bistveni pogoji za uresničevanje splošnih ciljev kohezijske politike, in da bi se morala preglednost zato uveljaviti kot vodilno načelo kohezijskega načrtovanja programov v vseh sektorjih in postopkov sprejemanja odločitev v naslednjem obdobju financiranje; poudarja, da je treba še naprej razkrivati podatke o upravičencih, zlasti na spletu, saj je to učinkovito sredstvo za izboljšanje preglednosti;
Considers that transparency in respect of cohesion policy and its programming cycle, allocation of expenditure and access to information for potential beneficiaries of the Structural Funds are key prerequisites for achieving the overall objectives of cohesion policy, and that transparency should therefore be introduced as a guiding cross-sectoral principle in the cohesion programming and decision-making processes in the next funding period; underlines that disclosure of the list of beneficiaries should be continued, notably online, as it is an efficient means of improving transparency;
meni, da so določbe o preglednosti (obveznost razkritja končnih upravičencev) nujen instrument tudi za strokovnjake, javnost in politike, da lahko preverijo, ali se strukturna sredstva uporabljajo v skladu z zastavljenimi cilji in zakoni; poziva k temu, da bi bil opis razen v jeziku države tudi v enem od treh delovnih jezikov (angleščina, nemščina ali francoščina), ter priporoča dodatno poenotenje zahtevanih informacij;
Considers that the transparency provisions (obligation to disclose the final beneficiary) are a necessary instrument for experts, the public and policy-makers to evaluate whether structural funding has been used in accordance with the objectives set and lawfully; calls for the description to be supplied not only in the relevant national language but also in one of the three working languages (English, French or German) and recommends further harmonisation of the information required;
poudarja, da kljub trendu zmanjševanja razlik med regijami še naprej obstajajo velika neravnovesja, ki se v nekaterih državah članicah in med njimi celo povečujejo, ter da se mora kohezijska politika zato še naprej osredotočati na zmanjševanje razlik in izvajanje skladnega in trajnostnega razvoja v vseh evropskih regijah, ne glede na to, v kateri državi članici obstajajo;
Emphasises that, despite the trend towards a narrowing of inter-regional disparities, major imbalances still exist – and among/in some Member States are actually growing, inter alia as a result of the economic and financial crisis – and that cohesion policy must therefore continue to concentrate on reducing disparities and implementing harmonious and sustainable development for all regions of the Union, regardless of the Member State in which they are located;
priznava posebne potrebe regij, ki so zaradi svoje lege ali naravnega okolja še posebej prikrajšane; ponovno poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj za posebej prikrajšane vrste regij (najbolj oddaljene regije, zelo redko poseljene najsevernejše regije in otoške, gorske ali čezmejne regije), navedene v Lizbonski pogodbi, še naprej uporabljajo posebne oblike preferenc, če so učinkovite in prinašajo evropsko dodano vrednost;
Recognises the special needs of regions particularly disadvantaged by virtue of their geographical situation or natural environment; reiterates its call to Member States and the Commission for special forms of preference to continue to apply – provided they are effective and bring European added value – in respect of the particularly disadvantaged types of region referred to in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (outermost regions, northernmost regions with a very low population density and island, mountain and cross-border regions);
priznava poseben status in potrebe nekaterih regij zaradi njihove lege, demografskih sprememb ali posebnih omejitev, kot je njihovo naravno okolje, ter namenja posebno pozornost njihovemu potencialu; ponovno poziva k nadaljnji uporabi posebnih oblik preferenc, prožnosti in posebnih proračunskih sredstev za te vrste regij, zlasti tiste iz členov 349 in 174 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki so še posebej prikrajšane (kot so najbolj oddaljene regije, vključno z najbolj oddaljenimi podeželskimi območji, zelo redko poseljene najsevernejše regije, ki so med drugim prikrajšane zaradi velikih razdalj in razmer na severu, ter otoške, gorske in čezmejne regije), z ugodnejšimi pogoji za naložbe v te regije prek neposredne pomoči ali davčnih olajšav; poziva k preučitvi možnosti za ohranitev ali uvedbo nekaterih preferenc za te vrste regij, da se zagotovi njihovemu gospodarstvu prilagojena uporaba kohezijske politike in ustrezno upošteva pomen malih in srednjih podjetij ter potreba po konkurenčnosti in enakih možnostih, da bi lahko ta gospodarstva postala del notranjega trga EU;
Recognises the special status and needs of certain regions stemming from their geographical situation, demographic change or specific constraints, such as their natural environment, while paying attention also to their potential; reiterates its call for special forms of preference, flexibility and special budget funding to continue to apply in respect of these types of regions, and in particular those referred to in Articles 349 and 174 of Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which are particularly disadvantaged (such as outermost regions, including the rural outermost areas, northernmost regions with a very low population density, which, inter alia suffer from long distances and northern conditions, and island, mountain and cross-border regions), with more favourable terms being provided for investment in these regions, by means of either direct assistance or tax exemptions; calls also for studies into the preservation or creation of certain preferences for these types of regions, with a view to ensuring that the use of cohesion policy instruments is adapted to their economies, with due regard for the importance of their small and medium-sized undertakings and the need for competitiveness and equal opportunities in order to make them an integral part of the EU internal market;
poudarja, da bo Unija v globalni konkurenci konkurenčna samo, če bo lahko kohezijska politika v celoti izkoristila razvojne možnosti vseh regij, mestnih območij in mest ter omogočila dovolj prožen odziv na izzive in ozka grla, opredeljena v strategiji Evropa 2020; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je treba ciljno usmerjeno uporabo sredstev strukturnih skladov s širšim teritorialnim pristopom izkoristiti za izravnavanje strukturnih pomanjkljivosti tudi v močnejših regijah; kljub temu poudarja, da kohezijska politika ni le orodje za izvedbo strategije EU 2020 in da bo nadaljnje osredotočanje na ključna načela kohezijske politike prispevalo k ohranjanju dosežkov te strategije tudi po koncu njenega izvajanja;
Emphasises that the Union will be able to be competitive in the face of global competition only if its cohesion policy can fully exploit the development potential of all the regions, urban areas and cities and allow a sufficiently flexible regional response to be made to the challenges and bottlenecks identified by the Europe 2020 strategy; underlines in this connection that targeting Structural Fund resources in a broad territorial approach must also serve to compensate for structural weaknesses in the stronger regions; stresses, however, that cohesion policy is not merely an implementing tool for Europe 2020 and that a continued focus on the core principles of cohesion policy will have the added value of sustaining the achievements of Europe 2020 even after the strategy has come to an end;
poudarja, da se mora kohezijska politika še naprej osredotočati na teritorialno kohezijo in da je Lizbonska pogodba slednjo dodala ciljema ekonomske in socialne kohezije; ugotavlja, da je ta cilj še naprej neločljivo povezan z izzivi ekonomske in socialne kohezije in da krepi evropsko dodano vrednost kohezijske politike; poudarja, da je teritorialna kohezija pomembna tudi na podregionalni ravni, zlasti v mestnih območjih (mestne četrti s težavami, nenadzorovano širjenje mest), in to celo v regijah, ki se štejejo za bogate;
Emphasises that cohesion policy must continue to focus on territorial cohesion and points out that the Lisbon Treaty added the objective of territorial cohesion to those of economic and social cohesion; affirms that this aim remains indissociable from the challenges of economic and social cohesion and strengthens the European added value of cohesion policy; emphasises that ‘territorial cohesion’ is also relevant at the sub-regional level, particularly in urban areas (urban districts facing difficulties, uncontrolled urban sprawl), even within regions considered to be rich;
meni, da so makroregionalne strategije, če so v njihovo upravljanje vključeni regionalni organi, velika priložnost za izkoriščanje oblik nadnacionalnih zmogljivosti, izboljšanje sodelovanja med različnimi ravnmi upravljanja in enotno spopadanje s skupnimi izzivi, kot so varstvo okolja ali uporaba virov in razvojnih zmogljivosti, kar omogoča bolj učinkovit, uravnotežen in trajnosten razvoj; opozarja, da je treba programe za teritorialno sodelovanje bolje povezati s teritorialnimi strategijami (kot so načrti regionalnega ter strategije in načrti lokalnega razvoja); meni, da bi se strukturni skladi EU z boljšo uskladitvijo obstoječih mehanizmov pomoči lahko uporabljali bolj usmerjeno, ne da bi to zahtevalo povečanje sredstev, namenjenih za ta področja medregionalnega sodelovanja; meni, da za te strategije ni treba ustvarjati novih instrumentov, finančnih virov ali struktur izvajanja ter da ne smejo vplivati na finančno pomoč, ki se zagotavlja regijam za razvojne projekte manjšega obsega; meni, da bi se za okrepitev povezav med kohezijsko in sosedsko politiko lahko uporabil makroregionalni pristop; spodbuja Komisijo in države članice, naj pri tem v večji meri upoštevajo teritorialno razsežnost Evropskega socialnega sklada, predvsem na področju dostopa do zaposlitve;
Sees macroregional strategies – provided that regional authorities are involved in their governance – as affording a major opportunity to harness forms of supranational potential, improve cooperation between the different levels of governance and take a joint approach towards shared challenges such as environmental protection or the use of resources and development capacities, thus allowing more efficient, balanced and sustainable development; highlights the need to link territorial cooperation programmes more effectively with territorial strategies (such as regional development plans, local development strategies and local development plans); considers that better coordination of existing support mechanisms can create scope for more targeted use of the EU Structural Funds, without this entailing any increase in the resources earmarked for these fields of inter-regional cooperation; takes the view, moreover that no new instruments, financial resources or implementation structures should be created for these strategies and that the financial support provided to the regions for smaller scale development projects must not be affected; considers that the macroregional approach could be used to strengthen the links between cohesion policy and neighbourhood policy; encourages the Commission and Member States, in this context, to take greater account of the territorial dimension of the ESF, in particular with regard to access to employment;
dvomi, da posebni operativni programi za funkcionalne geografske enote, kot so skupine organov, vključno z lokalnimi območji, morski bazeni ali povodja, prinašajo dodatno korist, zlasti kadar ni političnih organov (vključno z demokratično izvoljenimi), ki bi imeli zadostno pristojnost za njihovo izvajanje; namesto tega poziva k boljši uskladitvi makroregionalnih, velemestnih regionalnih ali okoljsko geografskih strategij na medvladni ravni in k ustreznemu upoštevanju teh funkcionalnih geografskih enot v nacionalnih operativnih programih, da se omogoči uporaba finančnih sredstev EU za medregionalne razvojne projekte; meni, da bi morali biti specifični operativni programi možnost v regijah, kjer izvajanje programov na podregionalni ravni ustvarja dodano vrednost v primerjavi z nacionalnimi in regionalnimi programi in kjer so politični organi za namene izvajanja oblikovala partnerstva; poziva, naj se na podlagi uredbe EZTS pri čezmejnih programih v oblikovanje operativnih programov vključijo tudi čezmejna združenja;
Doubts whether specific operational programmes for functional geographical entities such as groups of authorities including local areas, or sea or river basins will yield additional benefits, in particular in cases where there are no political authorities (including democratically elected authorities) with a sufficiently wide-ranging remit to implement them; calls instead for closer coordination of macroregional, metropolitan regional or environmental-geographic strategies at inter-governmental level and for appropriate consideration to be given to these functional geographical entities within national operational programmes in order to facilitate the use of EU funding for interregional development projects; considers that specific operational programmes should be an option for delivery in regions where sub-regional delivery provides added value vis-à-vis national and regional programmes and where partnerships have been formed by political bodies for implementation purposes; calls for cross-border groupings to be involved in devising the operational programmes for cross-border programmes, on the basis of the EGTC Regulation;
poudarja ključno vlogo mestnih območij in regij, vključno z glavnimi mesti in njihovimi regijami, za doseganje ekonomskih, ekoloških in socialnih ciljev strategije Evropa 2020; podpira dinamični proces, ki se je začel v prejšnjem programskem obdobju v korist celovitih programov za mestna okolja, in poudarja pomen preskusov, ki se izvajajo; poziva k podpori vzorčnih idej in projektov na podlagi celostnih lokalnih razvojnih načrtov ter vzajemno koristno okrepljeno povezavanje mest in podeželja, ki je funkcionalno povezano z mesti; meni, da je boljša kohezija med temi območji posebej pomembna za reševanje težav tistih, kjer živijo prikrajšane skupnosti; pri tem poudarja, da največje družbenogospodarske razlike pogosto obstajajo v mestih ter da je mogoče mesta s prikrajšanimi in revnimi območji najti tudi v bogatih regijah;
Stresses the key role of urban areas and regions – including capital cities and their regions – in achieving the economic, environmental and social objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy; supports the dynamic process launched during the previous programming period for Integrated Urban Programmes and stresses the importance of the experiments currently under way; calls for support for ideas and projects which can serve as models, on the basis of integrated place-based development plans, and for the mutually beneficial upgrading of links between towns and cities and the rural areas functionally linked to them; considers that greater cohesion between these areas is of special importance in addressing problems of areas with disadvantaged communities; stresses, in this context, that the greatest socioeconomic differences often exist within cities and that cities with deprived areas and pockets of poverty are also to be found in wealthy regions;
poudarja, da lahko mesta kot središča in gonilne sile rasti odločilno prispevajo k razvoju posamezne regije; hkrati poudarja, da bi morala imeti podeželska naselja v ta namen možnost sodelovati v celovitih rešitvah za posamezne funkcionalne geografske enote s spodbujanjem partnerstev in omrežij; poudarja posebne izzive večjih mestnih središč zaradi celovitosti njihovih socialnih, gospodarskih in okoljskih nalog; v zvezi s tem meni, da endogene možnosti podeželskih in primestnih območij omogočajo razvoj, čeprav ne le v bližini aglomeracij in velikih mest; poleg tega opozarja na možnosti za gospodarski razvoj posebej prikrajšanih regij z ustreznim izkoriščanjem in podpiranjem endogenih možnosti podeželskih območij, vključno z njihovim okoljskim in kulturnim bogastvom; meni tudi, da je treba v strukturni in kohezijski politiki obravnavati partnerstva med mesti in podeželjem bolj z vidika zagotavljanja enakih pogojev za razvoj podeželskih območij in kakovost življenja v njih ob upoštevanju socialnih in ekonomskih dejavnikov; poziva države članice, naj glede na dinamični vpliv mest na gospodarski razvoj regij ter spodbujanje gospodarstva v okoliških podeželskih območjih zagotovijo potrebne vire za izvajanje potrebnih projektov v mestih in predmestjih;
Stresses that towns and cities can make a key contribution, as growth centres and growth drivers, to a given region; points, at the same time, to the need for it to be made possible for rural settlements to participate in integrated solutions for a given functional geographical entity by means of the fostering of partnerships and networks; stresses that larger urban centres face specific challenges because of the complexity of their social, economic and environmental tasks; sees, in this context, the endogenous potential of rural and peri-urban areas as offering an opportunity for development, although not only around agglomerations and big cities; notes, furthermore, the opportunity for the economic development of particularly disadvantaged regions through appropriate exploitation of, and support for, the endogenous potential of rural areas, including their environmental and cultural assets; considers also, in the context of structural and cohesion policy, urban-rural partnerships more in terms of providing rural areas with the same conditions for development and quality of life with regard to social and economic factors; calls on the Member States, given the dynamic influence of towns and cities on economic development in the regions and in stimulating the economy in surrounding rural areas, to guarantee the resources needed to implement the urban and sub-urban projects required;
zavrača uporabo obveznih kvot zlasti za nacionalne dodelitve sredstev programov ESS/ESRR, lokalni razvoj in razvoj mest, podeželska območja in druge vrste prostorskih aglomeracij ali funkcionalnih območij, saj bi to zagotavljalo večjo kritično maso posegov; meni, da je obvezna določitev upravičenih mestnih in drugih območij že v operativnih programih možnost, ki bi jo bilo treba prednostno uporabljati, kadar ta način zagotavlja dodano vrednost in koncentracijo intenzivnosti pomoči, ter da se je treba o tem pogajati na podlagi načel upravljanja na več ravneh; meni, da je treba državam članicam in regijam pri tem dodeliti večjo odgovornost pri izvedbi konkurenčnih javnih natečajev, ki bodo upoštevali uspešnost;
Rejects the use of obligatory quotas, in particular for national allocations under ESF/ERDF programmes, for local and urban development, for rural areas and for other types of spatial agglomerations or functional areas, as this could ensure a larger critical mass of interventions; considers that the requirement to specify at operational programme level which urban and other areas are to be eligible for support is an option that should be prioritised wherever this method will ensure added value and concentration of aid intensity, and that this needs to be negotiated on the basis of the principles of multi-level governance; takes the view that the Member States and regions should to be given more responsibility to organise competitive and performance-based selection procedures in this respect as well;
poudarja, da v strukturni in kohezijski politiki ne sme priti do enostranskega dajanja prednosti posameznim vrstam regij; zahteva, naj se partnerstva med mesti in podeželjem obravnavajo v tesnejši povezavi s socialnim, ekonomskim in okoljskim okvirom;
Emphasises that structural and cohesion policy must not be biased towards specific types of region; calls for urban-rural partnerships to be seen in their broader social, economic and environmental context;
poudarja, da bi morala strukturna in kohezijska pomoč upoštevati tudi izobraževalne, kulturne in družbenopolitične izzive iz strategije Evropa 2020, hkrati pa ne odstopati od vseobsegajočega cilja EU glede ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije, kot je določeno v Pogodbi in spoštovati načelo subsidiarnosti; vendar meni, da je evropeizacija ustreznih političnih področij na celotnem ozemlju iz finančnih razlogov obsojena na neuspeh; zato zahteva nadaljnji razvoj lokalnih pristopov k lokalnemu razvoju, ki bi služili kot vzor in hkrati upoštevali obsoječe nacionalne in regionalne pristojnosti;
Emphasises that structural and cohesion funding should also take into account the educational, cultural and socio-political challenges of the Europe 2020 strategy, while remaining in line with the overarching EU objective of economic, social and territorial cohesion as enshrined in the Treaty and respecting the subsidiarity principle; takes the view, however, that across-the-board ‘Europeanisation’ of the relevant policy areas would fail on financial grounds; calls, therefore, for further place-based local development approaches that could serve as models to be introduced, while retaining existing national and regional competences;