natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Z odstopanjem od zgornjih meja, določenih v odstavkih 3, 4 in 5 se lahko prispevek EKSRP poveča do največ 95 % upravičenih javnih izdatkov v regijah, upravičenih po konvergenčnem cilju, in v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in za manjše Egejske otoke ter do 85 % upravičenih javnih izdatkov v drugih regijah.
By way of derogation from the ceilings set out in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, the EAFRD contribution may be increased up to a maximum of 95 % of eligible public expenditure in the regions eligible under the Convergence Objective and the outermost regions and the smaller Aegean Islands, and 85 % of eligible public expenditure in other regions.
Ti deleži se nanašajo na upravičene izdatke, ki bodo na novo prijavljeni v posameznih potrjenih izjavah o izdatkih,
These rates shall apply to the eligible expenditure newly declared in each certified declaration of expenditure
v obdobju, v katerem država članica izpolnjuje enega od naslednjih pogojev:
during the period in which a Member State complies with one of the following conditions:
finančna podpora je državi članici dana na razpolago v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 407/2010 z dne 11. maja 2010 o vzpostavitvi Evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo* ali jo državi članici da na razpolago druga država članica euroobmočja pred začetkom veljavnosti navedene uredbe,
financial assistance is made available to it under Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism* or is made available to it by other euro-area Member States before the entry into force of that Regulation;
srednjeročna finančna pomoč je državi članici dana na razpolago v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z dne 18. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic**,
medium-term financial assistance is made available to it in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments**;
finančna pomoč je državi članici dana na razpolago v skladu s Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost.
financial assistance is made available to it in accordance with the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism.
Država članica, ki želi uporabiti odstopanje iz prvega pododstavka, pri Komisiji predloži prošnjo za ustrezno spremembo njenega programa razvoja podeželja.
A Member State wishing to make use of the derogation provided for in the first subparagraph shall submit a request to the Commission to modify its rural development programme accordingly.
Odstopanje se uporablja, ko Komisija potrdi spremembe programa, in preneha veljati, ko država članica ne izpolnjuje več pogojev iz točk (a), (b) ali (c) prvega pododstavka.
The derogation shall apply from the approval, by the Commission, of the modification of the programme, and shall cease to apply once the Member State no longer fulfils any of the conditions set out in points (a), (b) or (c) of the first subparagraph.
Vsekakor se odstopanje iz prvega pododstavka uporablja le za izdatke, ki so jih imele plačilne agencije do 31. decembra 2013.
In any event, the derogation provided for in the first subparagraph shall apply only to expenditure incurred by the paying agencies until 31 December 2013.
Ko se odstopanje iz prvega pododstavka preneha uporabljati država članica Komisiji pošlje predlog za spremembo programa, vključno z novim finančnim načrtom, ki je skladen z največjimi deleži, ki so bili v uporabi pred odstopanjem.
When the derogation provided for in the first subparagraph ceases to apply, the Member State shall send the Commission a proposal for modification of the programme, including a new financing plan that complies with the maximum rates applicable before the derogation.
, ko se odstopanje preneha uporabljati v skladu z drugim pododstavkom,
the derogation ceases to apply in accordance with the second
Komisiji ne predloži predloga za spremembo programa za razvoj podeželja, vključno z novim finančnim načrtom, ali če priglašeni finančni načrt ni v skladu z največjimi deleži iz odstavkov 3, 4 in 5, se ti deleži samodejno začnejo uporabljati od tega datuma.
subparagraph ▌, or if the financing plan notified does not comply with the maximum rates laid down in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, those rates shall become automatically applicable from that date.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. decembra 2011 o trgovinskih ovirah in ovirah za naložbe ( 2011/2115(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 13 December 2011 on trade and investment barriers ( 2011/2115(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o tehničnih ovirah v trgovini (sporazum o TBT), ki je bil sprejet leta 1994 kot del urugvajskega kroga pogajanj v okviru STO http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt.pdf.
having regard to the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement) adopted in 1994 as part of the Uruguay Round of WTO negotiations http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/17-tbt.pdf
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 3286/94 z dne 22. decembra 1994 o določitvi postopkov Skupnosti na področju skupne trgovinske politike za zagotovitev izvrševanja pravic Skupnosti po mednarodnih pravilih trgovanja, zlasti tistih, ki so dogovorjena v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije UL L 349, 31.12.1994, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 of 22 December 1994 laying down Community procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community's rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organisation OJ L 349, 31.12.1994, p.
(uredba o trgovinskih ovirah),
(Trade Barriers Regulation, TBR),
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij, zlasti resolucije z dne 13. oktobra 2005 o obetih v trgovinskih odnosih med EU in Kitajsko UL C 233 E, 28.9.2006, str.
having regard to its earlier resolutions, in particular the resolution of 13 October 2005 on prospects for trade relations between the EU and China OJ C 233 E, 28.9.2006, p.
, resolucije z dne 1. junija 2006 o čezatlantskih gospodarskih odnosih EU-ZDA UL C 298 E, 8.12.2006, str.
, the resolution of 1 June 2006 on EU-US transatlantic economic relations OJ C 298 E, 8.12.2006, p.
, resolucije z dne 28. septembra 2006 o gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosih EU z Indijo UL C 306 E, 15.12.2006, str.
, the resolution of 28 September 2006 on the EU's economic and trade relations with India OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006, p.
, resolucije z dne 12. oktobra 2006 o gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosih med EU in Mercosurjem z namenom sklenitve medregionalnega pridružitvenega sporazuma UL C 308 E, 16.12.2006, str.
, the resolution of 12 October 2006 on economic and trade relations between the EU and Mercosur with a view to the conclusion of an Interregional Association Agreement OJ C 308 E, 16.12.2006, p.
, resolucije z dne 22. maja 2007 o globalni Evropi – zunanji vidiki konkurenčnosti UL C 102 E, 24.4.2008, str.
, the resolution of 22 May 2007 on Global Europe – external aspects of competitiveness OJ C 102 E, 24.4.2008, p.
, resolucije z dne 19. junija 2007 o gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosih z Rusijo UL C 146 E, 12.6.2008, str.
, the resolution of 19 June 2007 on EU economic and trade relations with Russia OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p.
, resolucije z dne 19. februarja 2008 o strategiji EU za olajšanje dostopa evropskim podjetjem na zunanje trge UL C 184 E, 6.8.2009, str.
, the resolution of 19 February 2008 on the EU's Strategy to deliver market access for European companies OJ C 184 E, 6.8.2009, p.
, resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2008 z naslovom „Reformirani Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji naproti“ UL C 259 E, 29.10.2009, str.
, the resolution of 24 April 2008 on ‘Towards a reform of the World Trade Organisation’ OJ C 259 E, 29.10.2009, p.
, resolucije z dne 5. februarja 2009 o trgovinskih in gospodarskih odnosih s Kitajsko UL C 67 E, 18.3.2010, str.
, the resolution of 5 February 2009 on Trade and economic relations with China OJ C 67 E, 18.3.2010, p.
, resolucije z dne 26. marca 2009 o sporazumu o prosti trgovini med EU in Indijo UL C 117 E, 6.5.2010, str.
, the resolution of 26 March 2009 on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2010, p.
, resolucije z dne 21. oktobra 2010 o trgovinskih odnosih Evropske Unije z Latinsko Ameriko Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0387 .
, the resolution of 21 October 2010 on the European Union's trade relations with Latin America Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0387 .
, resolucije z dne 17. februarja 2011 o sporazumu o prosti trgovini med EU in Republiko Korejo Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0063 .
, the resolution of 17 February 2011 on the Free Trade Agreement between the EU and the Republic of Korea Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0063 .
, resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2011 o evropski mednarodni naložbeni politiki Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0141 .
, the resolution of 6 April 2011 on European international investment policy Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0141 .
, stališča z dne 10. maja 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o prehodnih dogovorih za dvostranske sporazume o naložbah med državami članicami in tretjimi državami Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0206 .
, its Position of 10 May 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing transitional arrangements for bilateral investment agreements between Member States and third countries Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0206 .
, resolucije z dne 11. maja 2011 o trenutnem stanju pogajanj glede sporazuma o prosti trgovini med EU in Indijo Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0224 .
, the resolution of 11 May 2011 on the state of play in the EU-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0224 .
, resolucije z dne 11. maja 2011 o trgovinskih odnosih med EU in Japonsko Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0225 .
, the resolution of 11 May 2011 on EU-Japan Trade relations Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0225 .
, resolucije z dne 8. junija 2011 o trgovinskih odnosih med EU in Kanado Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0257 .
, the resolution of 8 June 2011 on EU-Canada trade relations Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0257 .
, resolucije z dne 13. septembra 2011 o učinkoviti strategiji o surovinah za Evropo Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0364 .
, the resolution of 13 September 2011 on an effective raw materials strategy for Europe Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0364 .
, resolucije z dne 27. septembra 2011 o novi trgovinski politiki za Evropo v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0412 .
, the resolution of 27 September 2011 on a New Trade Policy for Europe under the Europe 2020 Strategy Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0412 .
ter resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o modernizaciji na področju javnih naročil Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0454 .
and the resolution of 25 October 2011 on modernisation of public procurement Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0454 .
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom „Globalna Evropa: Konkurenca v svetu – Prispevek k strategiji EU za gospodarsko rast in delovna mesta“ ( KOM(2006)0567 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Global Europe: Competing in the World – A contribution to the EU's Growth and Jobs Strategy’ ( COM(2006)0567 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom „Trgovina, rast in svetovne zadeve – Trgovinska politika je temeljna sestavina strategije EU 2020“ ( KOM(2010)0612 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘Trade, Growth and World Affairs – Trade Policy as a core component of the EU's 2020 Strategy’ ( COM(2010)0612 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Evropskemu svetu z naslovom „Poročilo o trgovinskih ovirah in ovirah za naložbe v letu 2011 – Zavezovanje strateških gospodarskih partnerjev k boljšemu dostopu do trga: prednostni ukrepi za odstranitev trgovinskih ovir“ ( KOM(2011)0114 ),
having regard to the Report from the Commission to the European Council entitled ‘Trade and Investment Barriers Report 2011 – Engaging our strategic economic partners on improved market access: Priorities for action on breaking down barriers to trade’ ( COM(2011)0114 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila svetovalne družbe Copenhagen Economics z naslovom „Assessment of barriers to trade and investment between the EU and Japan“ (Ocena trgovinskih ovir in ovir za naložbe med EU in Japonsko), objavljenega 30. novembra 2009,
having regard to the report by Copenhagen Economics entitled ‘Assessment of barriers to trade and investment between the EU and Japan’, published on 30 November 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in mnenja Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0365/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0365/2011 ),
ker je večstranski in na pravilih temelječ trgovinski sistem, vzpostavljen pod okriljem Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), še vedno najprimernejši okvir za urejanje in spodbujanje odprte in poštene trgovine ter oblikovanje poštenih in pravičnih pravil svetovne trgovine, ker si je treba še vedno prizadevati za reformo STO, da bo postala bolj demokratična in učinkovita, ter pojasniti njene odnose z drugimi osrednjimi mednarodnimi organizacijami;
whereas the rule-based multilateral trading system, which was established under the aegis of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), is the most suitable framework for regulating and promoting open and fair trade and guaranteeing the development of fair and equitable global trade rules; whereas efforts are still needed to reform the WTO with a view to making it more democratic and efficient and clarifying its relations with other key international organisations;
ker mora EU glavno pozornost še naprej posvečati doseganju uravnoteženega izida razvojne agende iz Dohe, kar bi pomagalo državam v razvoju, še posebej najmanj razvitim državam, pri vključevanju v mednarodni trgovinski sistem in prispevalo k vzpostavitvi poštenih in bolj pravičnih večstranskih trgovinskih pravil v vseh državah članicah;
whereas the EU should continue to give priority to achieving a balanced outcome of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) which would support the integration of developing countries, particularly the least developed countries (LDCs), into the international trading system and contribute to establishing and enforcing fairer and more equitable multilateral trade rules among all its members;
ker mednarodna trgovinska statistika STO za obdobje 2000–2009 kaže, da se je znatno povečala trgovinska menjava v tistih regijah, ki so odprle trge z odpravo ali velikim zmanjšanjem ovir za trgovino Glej tudi http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_e.htm.
whereas the WTO International Trade Statistics for the period 2000-2009 show a substantial increase in trade exchanges for those regions which have opened up their markets by lifting or significantly reducing barriers to trade See also http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_e.htm.
; vendar ker je skupno poročilo Mednarodne organizacije dela in STO sočasno pokazalo, da so bile države, ki so bolj odprte za trgovino – tako industrializirane kot tiste v razvoju –, med finančno krizo izpostavljene večjim zunanjetrgovinskim pretresom, ki so povzročili izgubo velikega števila delovnih mest Skupno poročilo STO-MOD, Globalizacija in neformalna zaposlitev v državah v razvoju, 2009.
; but whereas at the same time a joint ILO-WTO report has shown that during the financial crisis some countries – in both industrialised and developing countries – that were more open to trade experienced more external trade shocks and that in those countries the shocks resulted in significant job losses Joint WTO-ILO report, Globalization and informal jobs in developing countries, 2009.
ker poročilo Komisije o trgovinskih ovirah in ovirah za naložbe 2011 navaja primere, v katerih dostop EU do trgov različnih držav sveta, tudi industrializiranih gospodarstev in gospodarstev v vzponu ter članic STO, bolj omejujejo različne netarifne kot pa tarifne ovire, ki se z napredovanjem globalizacije v znatni meri opuščajo;
whereas the Commission's Trade and Investment Barriers Report 2011 lists examples where the EU's market access to different countries in the world, including industrialised and major emerging economies and WTO members, is being constrained more by various non-tariff barriers (NTBs) than by trade tariffs, which are being waived substantially as globalisation progresses;
ker so postopki javnih naročil v strateških partnerskih državah EU pogosto zaprti za tuje udeležence in ker mednarodne obveznosti nanje še vedno vplivajo le v sorazmerno majhnem obsegu, medtem ko je EU na tem področju veliko bolj odprta kot druge države;
whereas public procurement procedures in the EU's strategic partner countries tend to be closed to foreign participants and are still relatively unaffected by international commitments, while the EU is much more open than other countries in this regard;
ker se evropski proizvajalci s težavo prebijajo na japonski trg, zlasti v avtomobilskem, letalskem in aeronavtičnem sektorju ter na področju javnih naročil; ker je na japonskem avtomobilskem trgu vzrok za te težave predvsem počasno sprejemanje ustreznih mednarodnih standardov na Japonskem, saj je Japonska sprejela le 40 od 127 pravilnikov UN/ECE v skladu s sporazumom iz leta 1958; ker vseeno priznava, da je med temi standardi kar 30 izmed 47 standardov, ki zadevajo osebne avtomobile (M1), sektor japonskega trga, ki je najpomembnejši za evropsko avtomobilsko industrijo, in ugotavlja, da počasni tempo sprejemanja mednarodnih standardov na Japonskem omejuje koristi določb o vzajemnem priznavanju iz sporazuma UN/ECE iz leta 1958; ker dialog med EU in Japonsko o regulativni reformi, začet leta 1994, še ni prinesel občutnejšega napredka pri usklajevanju oziroma vzajemnem priznavanju predpisov, kar zlasti v sedanjem gospodarskem ozračju kaže, kako pomembno je obravnavati in odpraviti nepotrebne netarifne ovire, po možnosti z začetkom pogajanj o sporazumu o gospodarskem povezovanju/sporazumu o prosti trgovini med EU in Japonsko, pod pogojem, da se bo pri pregledu izkazalo, da so izpolnjeni zahtevani pogoji, med drugim tisti, omenjeni zgoraj, vendar ne omejeno nanje, vključujoč 17 nerešenih vprašanj v sektorju osebnih vozil; ker ugotavlja, da je zaradi japonskega preskusnega cikla za merjenje emisij in učinkovitosti porabe goriva lahkih vozil veliko manj verjetno, da bodo lahko evropska vozila upravičena do japonskih davčnih spodbud za okoljsko učinkovitost;
whereas European manufacturers penetrate the Japanese market with difficulty, particularly in the automotive, aviation and aeronautics sectors, and especially in relation to public procurement; whereas in Japan's car market these difficulties are chiefly due to the slow pace of adoption by Japan of the relevant international standards (Japan has disappointingly adopted only 40 of the 127 UN-ECE Regulations under the 1958 Agreement); acknowledges, however, that these include 30 of the 47 that concern Passenger Cars (M1), the sector of Japan's market which is most relevant to European car manufacturers, and that the slow pace of adoption of international standards by Japan restricts the benefits of the mutual recognition provisions of the 1958 UN-ECE Agreement; whereas the EU-Japan Regulatory Reform Dialogue (RRD), launched in 1994, has not yet led to any significant progress on harmonisation or mutual recognition of regulations, which demonstrates, especially in light of the current economic climate, the importance of addressing and eliminating unnecessary NTBs, possibly by opening up negotiations on an EU-Japan EIA/FTA, provided that the scoping exercise shows that the required conditions, such as, but not limited to those mentioned above, including the 17 M1 sector issues, are met, and notes that Japan's test cycle to measure the emissions and fuel efficiency of light vehicles makes European ones less likely to qualify for the Japanese environmental performance-based tax incentives;
ker so zaradi povečanja izvoznih dajatev za baker z 0 % na 10 % ter za nikelj s 5 % na 10 % v Rusiji z decembrom 2010 ter zaradi visokih izvoznih dajatev za les nastale izvozne omejitve za bistvene surovine za evropske industrije, zlasti za jeklarski sektor Glej sklep, ki ga je sprejela komisija ruske vlade za zaščitne zunanjetrgovinske ukrepe v okviru odredb ruske vlade št. 892 in 893 z dne 12. novembra 2010.
whereas Russia's increase in export duties on copper from 0% to 10% and on nickel from 5% to 10% since December 2010, together with the high export duties on timber, have imposed export restrictions on vital raw materials for European industries, primarily the steel sector See the decision adopted by the Russian Government's Commission for the External Trade Protection Measures as per Russian Government Decree No 892 and No 893 of 12 November 2010.
in gozdarsko industrijo;
and the forestry industry;
ker bi morala biti pobuda za preglednost v ekstraktivni industriji (EITI) učinkovito orodje za zagotavljanje preglednosti in preprečevanje špekulacij na trgih surovin;
whereas the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) ought to be an effective tool for ensuring transparency and combating speculation on commodity markets;
ker so na Kitajskem netarifne ovire v zadnjih letih vse večje in lahko omejijo razvoj podjetij, zlasti malih in srednjih, ki delujejo na tem ozemlju;
whereas NTBs in China have been steadily growing in number in recent years and could restrict companies' development, particularly that of SMEs established on Chinese territory;
ker je bila več kot eno leto registracija evropskih kozmetičnih izdelkov na Kitajskem skoraj nemogoča, zlasti tistih, ki vsebujejo nove sestavine, saj na Kitajskem ni obstajala ustrezna pravna opredelitev teh sestavin, prav tako pa niso bile sprejete jasne smernice glede postopka Z začetkom veljavnosti odredbe št. 856 aprila 2010, ki jo je decembra 2009 izdala kitajska nacionalna agencija za prehrano in živila, je potrebna registracija kozmetičnih izdelkov.
whereas for more than a year the registration of European cosmetic products in China was almost impossible, particularly in the case of those containing new ingredients, because China lacked both a proper legal definition of the latter and clear guidelines on the procedure itself With the entry into force in April 2010 of the Decree 856 of December 2009, issued by the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) of China, the registration of cosmetics products is required.
Težave, ki so s tem nastale za podjetja iz EU, so bile obravnavane v okviru regulativnega dialoga GD SANCO-SFDA o kozmetiki.
The resulting problems for EU companies have been raised in the context of the DG SANCO - SFDA regulatory dialogue on cosmetics.