natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter Računskemu sodišču.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors.
ob upoštevanju sklepa konference predsednikov z dne 16. februarja 2012 glede predloga o ustanovitvi posebnega odbora za organiziran kriminal, korupcijo in pranje denarja ter opredelitvi njegovih pristojnostih, številčni sestavi in mandatu,
having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 16 February 2012 to propose that a special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering be set up and its powers and numerical composition defined,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o organiziranem kriminalu v Evropski uniji Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0459 .
having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2011 on organised crime in the European Union Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0459 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. septembra 2011 o prizadevanjih EU za boj proti korupciji Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0388 .
having regard to its resolution of 15 September 2011 on the EU's efforts to combat corruption Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0388 .
je sklenil ustanoviti poseben odbor za organiziran kriminal, korupcijo in pranje denarja z naslednjimi nalogami:
Decides to set up a special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering, with the following remit:
analizirati in oceniti razširjenost organiziranega kriminala, korupcije in pranja denarja ter njihovega vpliva na Unijo in njene države članice ter predlagati primerne ukrepe, da bo Unija lahko preprečila te grožnje in jim kljubovala tako na mednarodni, evropski kot nacionalni ravni;
to analyse and evaluate the extent of organised crime, corruption and money laundering and its impact on the Union and its Member States and to propose appropriate measures to enable the Union to forestall and counter these threats, including at international, European and national level;
analizirati in oceniti sedanje izvajanje zakonodaje Unije o organiziranem kriminalu, korupciji in pranju denarja ter povezanih politik, da bi zagotovil, da zakoni in politike Unije temeljijo na dokazih in da so podprti z najboljšimi ocenami groženj, prav tako je treba spremljati njihovo skladnost s temeljnimi pravicami v skladu s členoma 2 in 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti s pravicami iz Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, ter s temeljnimi načeli zunanjega delovanja Unije, predvsem s tistimi iz člena 21 Pogodbe;
to analyse and evaluate the current implementation of Union legislation on organised crime, corruption and money laundering, and related policies, in order to ensure that Union law and policies are evidence-based and supported by the best available threat assessments, as well as to monitor their compatibility with fundamental rights in accordance with Articles 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union, in particular the rights set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and the principles underpinning the Union's external action, in particular those set out in Article 21 of the Treaty;
preučiti in temeljito pregledati izvajanje vlog in dejavnosti agencij Unije za notranje zadeve (kot so Europol, odbor COSI in Eurojust), ki delujejo na področjih, povezanih z organiziranim kriminalom, korupcijo in pranjem denarja ter drugimi varnostnimi politikami;
to examine and scrutinise the implementation of the role and activities of the Union home affairs agencies (such as Europol, the COSI and Eurojust) working on matters relating to organised crime, corruption and money laundering, and related security policies;
, in resolucije z dne 15. septembra 2011 o prizadevanjih EU za boj proti korupciji;
, as well as in its resolution of 15 September 2011on the EU's efforts to combat corruption,
v ta namen vzpostaviti potrebne kontakte, organizirati obiske in predstavitve v institucijah Evropske unije ter v mednarodnih, evropskih in nacionalnih institucijah, nacionalnih parlamentih in vladah držav članic in tretjih držav, pri predstavnikih znanstvene skupnosti, poslovnih in civilnih družb ter pri osnovnih akterjih, organizacijah žrtev, uradnikih, vključenih v vsakodnevni boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu, korupciji in pranju denarja, kot so organi pregona, sodniki in akterji civilne družbe, ki spodbujajo kulturo legalnosti na težavnih področjih;
to these ends, to establish the necessary contacts, make visits and hold hearings with the European Union institutions and with the international, European and national institutions, the national parliaments and governments of the Member States and of third countries, and representatives of the scientific community, business and civil society, as well as grassroots actors, victims’ organisations, the officials involved in the daily fight against organised crime, corruption and money laundering, such as law enforcement agencies, judges and magistrates, and civil society actors who promote a culture of legality in difficult areas;
glede na to, da ostajajo pristojnosti stalnih odborov Parlamenta, odgovornih za vprašanja glede sprejetja, spremljanja in izvajanja zakonodaje Unije, ki se nanaša na to področje, nespremenjene, sklene, da lahko posebni odbor izdaja priporočila glede prihodnjih ukrepov in pobud v tesnem sodelovanju s stalnimi odbori;
Decides, given that the powers of Parliament's standing committees with responsibility for matters concerning the adoption, monitoring and implementation of Union legislation relating to this area remain unchanged, that the special committee may make recommendations regarding the measures and initiatives to be taken, in close collaboration with the standing committees;
sklene, da bo imel začasni odbor 45 članov;
Decides that the special committee shall have 45 members;
sklene, da bo mandat posebnega odbora 12 mesecev, ki se začne 1. aprila 2012, z možnostjo podaljšanja; sklene, da mora posebni odbor Parlamentu predložiti vmesno in končno poročilo o priporočilih glede tega, katere ukrepe in pobude bi bilo treba sprejeti.
Decides that the term of office of the special committee shall be 12 months, beginning on 1 April 2012, with the possibility of extension; decides that the special committee shall present to Parliament a mid-term report and a final report containing recommendations concerning the measures and initiatives to be taken.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. marca 2012 o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov ( 2012/2575(RSP) )
European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2012 on judicial training ( 2012/2575(RSP) )
ob upoštevanju členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki predvidevata sprejetje ukrepov v „pomoč pri usposabljanju sodnikov in zaposlenih na sodišču“ z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom,
having regard to Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which provide for the adoption under the ordinary legislative procedure of measures aimed at ensuring ‘support for the training of the judiciary and judicial staff’,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. septembra 1991 o ustanovitvi evropske pravne akademije UL C 267, 14.10.1991, str.
having regard to its resolution of 10 September 1991 on the establishment of a European Law Academy OJ C 267, 14.10.1991, p.
, svoje resolucije z dne 9. julija 2008 o vlogi nacionalnih sodnikov v evropskem sodnem sistemu UL C 294 E, 3.12.2009, str.
, its resolution of 9 July 2008 on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system OJ C 294 E, 3.12.2009, p.
in svojega priporočila Svetu z dne 7. maja 2009 o razvoju kazenskopravnega območja EU UL C 212 E, 5.8.2010, str.
, and its recommendation of 7 May 2009 to the Council on development of an EU criminal justice area OJ C 212 E, 5.8.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o akcijskem načrtu za izvajanje stockholmskega programa ( COM(2010)0171 ),
having regard to the Commission communication on an Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme' ( COM(2010)0171 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. junija 2010 o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov UL C 236 E, 12.8.2011, str.
having regard to its resolution of 17 June 2010 on judicial training OJ C 236 E, 12.8.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 13. septembra 2011 z naslovom „Vzpostavljanje zaupanja v pravosodni sistem celotne EU – nova razsežnost evropskega izobraževanja v pravosodju“( COM(2011)0551 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 13 September 2011 entitled ‘Building trust in EU-wide justice – a new dimension to European judicial training’ ( COM(2011)0551 ),
ob upoštevanju pilotnega projekta za izobraževanje pravosodnih organov, ki ga je Parlament predlagal leta 2011,
having regard to the pilot project on judicial training proposed by Parliament in 2011,
ob upoštevanju primerjalne študije o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov v državah članicah, ki jo je Parlament naročil pri ERA v sodelovanju z EJTN http://www.europarl.europa.eu/delegations/en/studiesdownload.html?languageDocument=EN&file=60091
having regard to the comparative study on judicial training in the Member States commissioned by Parliament from ERA in collaboration with the EJTN http://www.europarl.europa.eu/delegations/en/studiesdownload.html?languageDocument=EN&file=60091
ker omenjena študija preučuje dejavnosti, ki jih na tem področju izvajajo nacionalne pravosodne izobraževalne ustanove, vključno z vrsto usposabljanja, pogoji in proračunskimi viri, njen namen pa je poleg tega opredeliti potrebe in predlagati izboljšave in praktične zglede ter predstaviti rezultate poglobljene ankete med več kot 6.000 sodniki in tožilci v državah članicah, s poudarkom na njihovih izkušnjah z izobraževanjem o pravu EU in njihovih predlogih za izboljšave;
whereas the above-mentioned study took stock of the activities carried out in this field by national schools for the judiciary, including the type of training offered, relevant conditions, and budgetary resources, with a view also to identifying needs and suggestions for improvement and best practices, and contains the results of an in-depth survey of over 6 000 judges and prosecutors in the Member States focusing on their experience of EU law training and their suggestions for improvement;
ker bi morali pravosodnemu usposabljanju pravzaprav reči „pravosodne študije“, da se poudari posebna narava nepretrganega intelektualnega razvoja, ki je potreben v pravosodju, in dejstvo, da so prav sodniki najbolj poklicani za izvajanje pravosodnega usposabljanja;
whereas judicial training should properly be called ‘judicial studies’ to reflect the special nature of the continuing intellectual development that members of the judiciary have to undergo and the fact that the best people to provide judicial studies are judges themselves;
ker trenutna ponudba izobraževanja še zdaleč ne izpolnjuje ciljev Komisije, namreč da bi morala biti na voljo polovici pravnih strokovnjakov v EU;
whereas the supply of training is currently far from meeting the Commission's target, namely that it should be available to half of EU legal professionals;
ker so glede na ugotovitve iz študije jezikovne ovire, pomanjkanje (pravočasnih) informacij o obstoječih programih, dejstvo, da programi niso vedno prilagojeni potrebam sodnikov, velike delovne obremenitve sodnikov in nezadostno financiranje med glavnimi razlogi za razmeroma majhno število tistih, ki se izobražujejo o pravu EU (53 %, od tega samo tretjina v zadnjih treh letih);
whereas according to the study language barriers, a lack of (timely) information on existing programmes, the fact that programmes are not always adapted to judges' needs, together with judges' heavy workloads and the lack of relevant funding are among the reasons for the relatively low level of respondents receiving training in EU law (53 %, and only one third of them within the last 3 years);
ker je v trenutnih razmerah finančne varčnosti tudi s proračunskega vidika priporočljivo, da se izkoristijo obstoječe ustanove, zlasti nacionalne šole za pravosodno izobraževanje, pa tudi univerze in strokovni organi, kar zadeva vidike nacionalne zakonodaje pri vzpostavljanju evropske pravosodne kulture; ker bo na ta način mogoče opredeliti najboljše prakse v državah članicah, jih gojiti in širiti po celotni EU; ker bi morala pri izobraževanju o pravu EU svojo vlogo še naprej igrati Evropska pravna akademija (ERA);
whereas it is wise, including from the budgetary point of view in the present situation of financial stringency, to take advantage of existing institutions, particularly national judicial training schools, but also universities and professional bodies, as far as the ‘national law’ aspects of building a European judicial culture are concerned; whereas, by this means, best practices can be identified in the Member States and fostered and disseminated across the EU; whereas as far as training in EU law is concerned, the Academy of European Law (ERA) should continue to play its role;
ker je Parlament že opozoril, da mora evropsko pravosodno območje graditi na skupni pravosodni kulturi izvajalcev, sodnikov in tožilcev, ki pa ne sme izhajati samo iz prava EU, temveč jo je treba razviti s skupnim poznavanjem in razumevanjem nacionalnih pravosodnih sistemov, temeljito prenovitvijo univerzitetnih učnih programov, izmenjavami, študijskimi obiski in skupnim usposabljanjem z dejavno podporo Evropske pravne akademije, evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje in Evropskega pravnega inštituta;
whereas, as Parliament has already pointed out, the European judicial area must be built on a shared judicial culture among practitioners, the judiciary and prosecutors which is not only based on EU law but developed through mutual knowledge and understanding of the national judicial systems, a root-and-branch revamping of university curricula, exchanges, study visits and common training with the active support of the Academy of European Law, the European Judicial Training Network and the European Law Institute;
ker bi moralo biti izobraževanje pravosodnih organov povezano z razpravo o tradicionalni vlogi pravosodja in njegovi modernizaciji, o tem, kako ga odpreti in razširiti njegova obzorja; ker to zahteva tudi jezikovno izobraževanje ter spodbujanje študija primerjalnega in mednarodnega prava;
whereas judicial training should be linked to a debate on the traditional role of the judiciary and its modernisation, how to open it up and broaden its horizons; whereas this also entails language training and promoting the study of comparative law and international law;
ker je treba med delavci v pravosodju gojiti skupno sodno kulturo na podlagi listine o temeljnih pravicah, dela beneške komisije Sveta Evrope in podobno, da se okrepijo osrednje vrednote pravosodnega poklica z razpravo in širjenjem enotne poklicne etike, pravna država in načela za imenovanje in izbor sodnikov in da se prepreči politizacija pravosodja, s tem pa spodbudi vzajemno zaupanje, potrebno za uresničenje skupnega pravosodnega območja;
whereas a common judicial culture also needs to be created among members of the judiciary using the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the work of the Council of Europe's Venice Commission and so on to promote the core values of the judicial profession by discussing and promulgating common professional ethics, the rule of law and the principles for the appointment and selection of judges, and to avoid the politicisation of the judiciary, thereby promoting the mutual trust necessary to make the common judicial area a reality;
ker je treba ustvariti nove mreže sodnikov iz različnih kultur in izboljšati usklajevanje v obstoječih mrežah, da bodo lahko nastali „krogi usklajenosti“; ker elektronska komunikacija za to ne zadostuje, ampak so potrebni forumi, kjer bodo lahko sodniki vzpostavljali medsebojne stike, pritegniti pa je treba tudi sodnike z luksemburškega in strasbourškega sodišča;
whereas it is necessary to create networks between judges of different cultures and improve coordination of the existing networks in order to create ‘circles of coherence’; whereas, for this, electronic communication is not enough, and there must be fora in which judges can make contact and it is essential to involve judges from the Luxembourg and Strasbourg Courts;
ker pravosodne študije ne smejo biti omejene na materialno in postopkovno pravo in ker se morajo sodniki usposabljati tudi o sodnem delu in veščinah;
whereas judicial studies cannot be limited to substantive and procedural law, and whereas judges need training related to their judicial business and in ‘judgecraft’;
meni, da bi bilo mogoče glede na proračunske omejitve in odgovore sodnikov iz omenjene ankete kljub dejstvu, da so osebni stiki najboljša možnost, takšno usposabljanje in svetovanje zagotavljati prek interneta (videokonference, spletni tečaji, spletne oddaje), pa tudi z izmenjavami; ugotavlja, da se sodniki zavzemajo za nadaljnje ocene in prilagoditev izobraževalnih programov njihovim potrebam, pri čemer dajejo prednost interaktivnemu usposabljanju, kjer lahko izmenjujejo izkušnje in razpravljajo o konkretnih primerih, pred klasičnimi (od zgoraj navzdol) oblikami izobraževanja;
Believes, while acknowledging that direct contacts are the best option, that in view of the budgetary constraints, as well as the responses given by judges in the study, such training and advice could also be provided via the Internet (video-conferencing, on-line courses, webstreaming) as well as by means of exchanges; notes that judges call for further assessment and adaptation of training programmes to their needs, while they seem to prefer interactive training where they can exchange experiences and discuss case studies rather than ‘classic’ (top-down) training formulae;
meni, da bi bil dodatni cilj uskladitev usposabljanja, ki ga ponujajo obstoječe ustanove za pravosodno izobraževanje, ter olajšanje in krepitev dialoga in stikov med strokovnjaki;
Considers that a further aim would be to coordinate the training provided by existing judicial training schools and facilitate and promote dialogue and professional contacts;
ugotavlja, da je večjezično usposabljanje pomembno, saj je študija pokazala, da razmeroma majhno število sodnikov tuje jezike govori tako dobro, da bi lahko dejavno sodelovali v pravosodnem usposabljanju v drugih državah članicah;
Notes that multilingual training is important, as the study shows that only a relatively small number of judges speak a foreign language well enough to be able to participate actively in judicial training in other Member States;
meni, da bi lahko težave (stroški, jezikovno izobraževanje, stroškovna učinkovitost) rešili z uporabo sodobnih tehnologij in financiranjem razvoja programov v smislu Applove knjižnice iTunes U; takšni programi, ki bi jih pripravljale nacionalne šole, ERA, univerze in druge izobraževalne ustanove, bi vsebovali tečaje z videogradivom, vključno z jezikovnim usposabljanjem (s posebnim poudarkom na pravni terminologiji), in napotke glede nacionalnih pravnih sistemov, zlasti pravnih postopkov in podobno, bili pa bi brezplačni za delavce v pravosodju;
Takes the view that one way of resolving the problems (costs, language training, cost-effectiveness) is to utilise modern technology and finance the creation of applications (‘apps’) on the lines of Apple's ITunes U; such ‘apps’, prepared by the national schools, ERA, universities and other trainers, would consist of training courses, with video material, including language training (with particular emphasis on legal terminology) and instruction about national legal systems, particular legal procedures, etc. and would be free of charge to members of the judiciary;
meni, da bi lahko uspešna udeležba na takšnih tečajih tlakovala pot za program Erasmus za sodnike in udeležbo na tečajih v tujini;
Considers that successful participation in such courses could constitute the gateway to Erasmus for judges and to participation in training courses abroad;
predlaga, da bi bili ti programi na voljo tudi pravnim strokovnjakom, strokovnim organom, akademijam in študentom prava za nizko ceno, njihov razvoj in izdelava pa bi v manjšem obsegu celo spodbudila gospodarstvo in zaposlovanje z razmeroma majhnim vložkom;
Suggests that such ‘apps’ could be also be made available to legal practitioners, professional bodies, academics and law students for a modest charge and that their development and production would provide a modest boost to the economy and employment for a relatively small outgoing;
meni, da bi se moral pilotni projekt pod vodstvom Luigija Berlinguerja in Erminie Mazzoni, ki naj bi se začel v letu 2012, osredotočiti predvsem na opredelitev in širjenje najboljših praks pri organiziranju usposabljanja o pravu EU v nacionalnih pravosodnih sistemih in šolah; meni, da bi lahko EU spodbudila države članice, naj se zgledujejo po uspešnih ustanovah, kot so koordinatorji za pravo EU v Italiji in na Nizozemskem v okviru nacionalnih sodišč, in podprejo usposabljanje takšnih koordinatorjev oziroma jim olajšajo delo na ravni EU;
Considers that the pilot project, presented by Luigi Berlinguer and Erminia Mazzoni and scheduled to be run in 2012, should aim first of all to identify and expand best practices in organising access to EU law and relevant training within the national judicial systems and training schools; considers, for instance, that the EU should encourage Member States to emulate successful institutions, such as EU law coordinators of the kind that exist in Italy and the Netherlands within the national court structure, and promote the training of such coordinators and otherwise facilitate their work at EU level;
meni, da bi bilo treba v pilotnem projektu ustanoviti delovno skupino ponudnikov pravosodnega usposabljanja na nacionalni in evropski ravni, pa tudi izvensodnih akterjev, katere cilj bi bil opredeliti niz tem v okviru prava EU, ki so najpomembnejše za vsakodnevno sodno prakso, tako pri praktičnih (kako vložiti zahtevo za predhodno odločanje, kako dostopati do podatkovnih zbirk prava EU itd.) kot pri vsebinskih vprašanjih;
Takes the view that the pilot project should encompass the creation of a working group comprising national and European judicial training providers as well as extra-judicial actors, whose aim would be to identify a series of thematic ‘clusters’ of EU law issues, which seem to be the most relevant for everyday judicial practice, both on ‘practical’ matters (how to submit a request for preliminary ruling, how to access EU law databases, etc.), and on matters of substance;
predlaga, da bi pilotni projekt usklajeval (a) medsebojno svetovanje in izmenjavo znanja o posameznih pravnih sistemih med pravosodnimi izobraževalnimi ustanovami, pri čemer bi gradil na obstoječih mrežah in virih, ter (b) formalno usposabljanje in seznanjanje s tujimi pravnimi sistemi;
Suggests that the pilot project could coordinate (a) the exchange of advice and knowledge about individual legal systems among the individual judicial training schools, building upon the existing networks and resources and (b) formal training and familiarisation with foreign legal systems;
predlaga še, naj Komisija vsako leto organizira forum, na katerem bi se lahko sodniki vseh stopenj na pravnih področjih, kjer se pogosto pojavljajo domači in čezmejni problemi, pogovarjali o zadnjih pravnih spornih točkah in težavah, da bi spodbudili razpravo, vzpostavili stike, ustvarili kanale za komuniciranje ter poglobili medsebojno zaupanje in razumevanje; meni, da bi forum pristojnim organom, izvajalcem izobraževanja in strokovnjakom, vključno z univerzami in strokovnimi organi, ponudil priložnost, da razpravljajo o politiki pravosodnega usposabljanja in prihodnosti pravnega izobraževanja v Evropi;
Proposes, lastly, that the Commission hold an annual forum at which judges of all levels of seniority in areas of law where domestic and cross-border issues frequently arise can hold discussions on a recent area or areas of legal controversy or difficulty, in order to encourage discussion, build contacts, create channels of communication and build mutual confidence and understanding; considers that such a forum could also afford an opportunity for the competent authorities, training providers and experts, including the universities and the professional bodies, to discuss judicial training policy and the future of legal education in Europe;