natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pričakuje, da bo agencija preudarno vodila svojo dolgoletno politiko, da sklepa pogodbe o terminskih valutnih poslih, da bi proračunska sredstva za upravne odhodke zavarovala pred neugodnim nihanjem menjalnega tečaja britanskega funta; od agencije pričakuje, da bo upravljala takšne transakcije, da se preprečijo izgube zaradi tečajnih razlik, kot tiste iz leta 2009 v višini 900 000 EUR; poudarja, da jo je Računsko sodišče že večkrat opozorilo na ta problem; od agencije zahteva, da svojo revidirano politiko vodenja zakladnice nemudoma sporoči pristojnemu odboru Parlamenta; bo spremljal revidirano politiko vodenja zakladnice;
Expects the Agency to prudently manage its longstanding policy of entering into a forward foreign exchange contract in order to hedge part of its administrative budget against unfavourable fluctuations in the sterling exchange rate; expects the Agency to prudently manage such transactions to avoid exchange losses, such as those in 2009 of EUR 900 000; points out that this is a recurrent observation made by the Court of Auditors; requests the Agency to communicate its revised treasury policy to Parliament's competent committee without delay; will monitor the revised treasury policy;
od agencije ugotavlja, da je revizijski svetovalni odbor agencije revidiral politiko vodenja zakladnice, jo sprejel in uradno potrdil; poziva agencijo, da Parlamentu pred 30. junijem 2011 posreduje pregled izvajanja revidirane politike vodenja zakladnice;
Notes from the Agency that the treasury policy has been revised, adopted and formally approved by the Agency's Audit Advisory Committee; calls on the Agency to provide Parliament with an overview of the implementation of the revised treasury policy before 30 June 2011;
meni, da je ocenjevanje ustreznosti in učinkovitosti obstoječih sistemov, namenjenih zagotavljanju znanstvenih nasvetov glede zdravil za ljudi, pomembno orodje za merjenje uspešnosti agencije; ugotavlja, da je služba za notranjo revizijo odkrila hude pomanjkljivosti v zvezi s tem;
Considers the assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of the systems in place to support the provision of scientific advice for human medicines in the Agency as an important tool to measure the Agency's performance; acknowledges that the IAS performed audits and found critical deficiencies in this respect;
se mu zdi nesprejemljivo, da agencija ne uporablja zadevnih pravil učinkovito, kar ima za rezultat pomanjkanje kakršnega koli zagotovila, da vrednotenje zdravil za ljudi izvajajo neodvisni strokovnjaki; poudarja, da v letu 2009 še vedno ni bilo izvedenih dvanajst ’zelo pomembnih’ in eno ’kritično’ priporočilo iz številnih predhodnih letnih revizijskih poročil o agenciji, ki jih je izvedla notranja služba za revizijo, večina katerih zadeva neodvisnost strokovnjakov, pri čemer najstarejše priporočilo sega v leto 2005;
Finds it unacceptable that the Agency does not apply the relevant rules effectively, resulting in the fact that there is no guarantee that the evaluation of human medicines is performed by independent experts; points out that twelve ’very important’ and one ’critical’ recommendation from several earlier IAS Annual Audit Reports on the Agency, most of them concerning the independence of experts, were still not implemented in 2009, while the oldest recommendation dates back to 2005;
ugotavlja, da se je direktor agencije zaposlil na področju svetovanja, ki med drugim farmacevtskim družbam svetuje glede razvoja novih zdravil in zmanjševanja obdobja za njihovo trženje; poudarja, da ta premik zbuja dvome glede aktualne neodvisnosti agencije; ugotavlja, da člen 16 Kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike Evropske unije UL L 56, 4.3.1968, str.1.
Takes note of the employment of the Agency's former Executive Director by a consultancy that advises, among others, pharmaceutical companies on developing new medication and reducing the period to their market introduction; stresses that this move casts some doubt on the actual independence of the Agency; notes that Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p.
ni pripravljen sprejeti dejstva, da agencija ne spoštuje natančno kodeksa o ravnanju pri določanju načel in smernic o neodvisnosti in zaupnosti, ki veljajo za člane sveta in odbora, strokovnjake in zaposlene v agenciji; od agencije pričakuje, da pred določanjem projektnih vodij za izdelke podrobno oceni, ali bi lahko interesi, ki so jih razkrili uslužbenci, vplivali na njihovo nepristranskost in neodvisnost; poleg tega poziva agencijo, naj dokumentira in oceni svoje kontrole ter vodi evidenco sklepov o dodeljevanju projektov, ki morajo biti na voljo na njeni spletni strani;
Considers it unacceptable that the Agency is not complying effectively with its Code of Conduct by setting out principles and guidance on independence and confidentiality applicable to the Management Board and committees’ members, experts and Agency's staff; expects the Agency to assess thoroughly, before the allocation of project team leaders to products, whether the interests declared by staff members might influence their impartiality and independence; urges, in addition, the Agency to document and assess its controls and file the relevant allocation decisions which must be made available on its website;
poudarja, da bi lahko v primerih, ko bi bile ocene postavljene pod vprašaj zaradi navzkrižja interesov, trpel ugled agencije;
Stresses that the Agency's reputation could be affected in cases where evaluations can be challenged on the grounds of possible conflicts of interest;
nemudoma poziva agencijo, da organu za podeljevanje razrešnice posreduje elemente, ki jih je vzpostavila za zagotavljanje neodvisnosti strokovnjakov vse od svoje ustanovitve;
Urges the Agency to inform the discharge authority of the steps it has taken to ensure the independence of its experts since its inception;
se sprašuje o tem, da pomanjkljivosti glede ocenjevanja neodvisnosti strokovnjakov niso navedene v poročilih Računskega sodišča glede letnih računovodskih izkazov agencije od leta 2006 dalje;
Wonders why the Court of Auditors’ reports since 2006 on the Agency's annual accounts make no mention of any deficiencies with regard to the assessment of experts’ independence;
zahteva, da se ga obvesti, ali se je preverila neodvisnost strokovnjakov in osebja, ki so obravnavali zdravila, ki vsebujejo benfluoreks, in če je to tako, na kakšen način, in kako so bili preverjeni njihovi razkriti interesi;
Asks to be informed if and how the experts and staff dealing with any of the benfluorex group of drugs were screened on their independence and how their interests declared were verified;
od agencije ni pripravljen sprejeti dejstva, da bodo informacije v dokumentaciji glede zdravil za ljudi nepopolne; v zvezi s tem jo še poziva, naj poskrbi za to, da bo mogoče bistvene informacije preprosto poiskati in da se bodo upoštevale vse zadevne smernice o sistemu arhiviranja;
Considers it unacceptable for the Agency to allow the information in its files on human medicines to be incomplete; urges, in this respect, the Agency to guarantee that key information is easily retrieved and all relevant guidelines on the filing system are in place;
poleg tega od agencije zahteva, naj dopolni in redno posodablja podatkovno zbirko evropskih strokovnjakov, kot zahteva Uredba (ES) št. 726/2004, in o tem obvešča organ za podeljevanje razrešnice; agencijo še poziva, naj dovoli pridobivanje informacij iz podatkovne zbirke SIAMED in podatkovne zbirke s pregledom proizvodov;
Asks the Agency, moreover, to complete and regularly update the European Experts Database as required by Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, and to keep the discharge authority informed; urges also the Agency to allow SIAMED and Product Overview databases for efficient retrieval of information;
pozdravlja prizadevanja agencije, da bi ponudila obsežnejše znanstveno svetovanje v zgodnjih fazah razvoja novih zdravil, kakor tudi ukrepe za pospešitev ocenjevanja zdravil, ki so bistvenega pomena za javno zdravje, ter za pospešitev razvoja in izvajanja telematskih programov;
Welcomes the efforts of the Agency to provide more scientific advice at the early stages of the development of new medicines as well as the introduction of measures to accelerate the assessment of medicines that are of critical importance to public health and to accelerate the development and implementation of telematics’ programmes;
poziva agencijo, naj zagotovi, da se naloge zaupne narave ne bodo dodeljevale začasnim uslužbencem; je seznanjen z dejstvom, da agencija zaposluje začasne uslužbence (32 v letu 2009) pod pogojem, da so kandidati opravili preizkus za pogodbene delavce, ter da nekateri začasni uslužbenci opravljajo naloge zaupne narave ali imajo dostop do zaupnih podatkov; opozarja na tveganje, da bi prišlo do varnostnih kršitev, ker imajo začasni uslužbenci dostop do zaupnih informacij ali ne poznajo postopkov, ki jih je treba izvesti;
Calls on the Agency to ensure that sensitive tasks are not assigned to interim staff; acknowledges, in fact, that the Agency hires interim staff (32 in 2009) on the condition that the candidates have passed the tests for contract agents and some of the interim staff perform sensitive tasks or have access to sensitive information; stresses the risks of potential security breaches linked to interim staff's access to sensitive information or unawareness by interim staff of the procedure to follow;
poziva agencijo, naj izboljša postopek zaposlovanja in poskrbi za ustrezno vodenje dokumentacije; je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je služba za notranjo revizijo odkrila pomanjkljivosti v zvezi s tem; poudarja tudi, da se agencija zaradi pomanjkljive dokumentacije v postopku zaposlovanja ne bi mogla primerno odzvati na morebitne obtožbe o neenaki obravnavi kandidatov in/ali o samovoljnih odločitvah o zaposlovanju; prav tako meni, da zaradi omejene konkurence postopki zaposlovanja morda ne ponujajo optimalne izbire, prav tako pa utegne priti do neučinkovite uporabe človeških virov in finančnih sredstev;
Calls on the Agency to strengthen its recruitment process and ensure its documentation is correctly managed; acknowledges, in fact, that the IAS found deficiencies in this respect; stresses, also, that insufficient documentation in recruitment procedures reduces the possibility for the Agency to respond to allegations of unequal treatment of candidates and/or arbitrary decisions on recruitment of staff; considers, furthermore, that to the extent that competition is limited, resulting recruitment may not represent the optimal choice and human and financial resources may be used inefficiently;
ni pripravljen sprejeti dejstva, da izjava o zanesljivosti izvršnega direktorja z dne 13. maja 2010 ne vsebuje nobenega pridržka, in posledično ne spoštuje obveze iz kodeksa o ravnanju, ki ga je sprejela agencija, glede izjav o zanesljivosti službe za notranjo revizijo in Računskega sodišča;
Considers it unacceptable that the Executive Director's statement of assurance, dated 13 May 2010, does not mention any reservations, and is consequently inconsistent with the undertaking given in the Code of Conduct adopted by the Agency in the light of the statements of assurance from the IAS and the Court of Auditors;
opozarja, da ima izvršni direktor obvezo, da v svoje poročilo vključi povzetek vsebine poročil službe za notranjo revizijo organu za podeljevanje razrešnice, in zlasti:
Points out that the Executive Director's report is required to contain a summary of the reports from the IAS to the discharge authority, including:
število in vrsto notranjih revizij, ki jih je opravila služba za notranjo revizijo;
the number and types of internal audits conducted by the IAS,
vsa priporočila (tudi tista, ki bi jih agencija utegnila zavrniti) in
all the recommendations made (including any that may have been rejected by the Agency), and
vse ukrepe, sprejete na podlagi teh priporočil,
all the measures taken on the basis of those recommendations;
ugotavlja pobudo agencije, da organu za podeljevanje razrešnice posreduje letno poročilo o poslovanju agencije, ki ga pripravi služba za notranjo revizijo; meni, da bi to morala biti običajna praksa preglednosti in pričakuje, da bodo tej praksi sledile vse druge agencije;
Notes the Agency's initiative of providing the discharge authority with the IAS Annual Internal Audit Report on the Agency; considers that this should be the normal practice of transparency and expects that all other agencies will follow this practice;
ugotavlja, da je izmed 32 priporočil službe za notranjo revizijo eno ’kritično’, namreč o izvedbenih postopkih za strokovnjake, 12 pa jih je ’zelo pomembnih’ ter se nanašajo predvsem na kadrovsko vodenje, upravljanje navzkrižja interesov zaposlenih in druge postopke znanstvenega vrednotenja zdravil za ljudi v agenciji; zato poziva agencijo, naj organ za podeljevanje razrešnice nemudoma obvesti o natančni vsebini teh priporočil; poziva agencijo, naj nemudoma izvede priporočila službe za notranjo revizijo in organu za podeljevanje razrešnice posreduje celovit pregled sprejetih in izvedenih ukrepov, da se do 30. junija 2011 ta priporočila obravnavajo; poleg tega od Računskega sodišča zahteva, naj spremlja učinkovitost sprejetih ukrepov in o tem obvešča organ za podeljevanje razrešnice;
Acknowledges that, out of the 32 recommendations of the IAS, one is ’critical’ on the implementing procedures involving experts and twelve are ’very important’ mainly on human resources management, on management of staff's conflicts of interest and on other procedures supporting the provision of scientific evaluation for human medicines in the Agency; calls, therefore, on the Agency to inform the discharge authority about the precise content of these recommendations without delay; urges the Agency to rapidly implement the IAS recommendations and to provide the discharge authority with a complete overview of measures taken and implemented to properly address these recommendations by 30 June 2011; asks, in addition, the Court of Auditors to monitor and inform the discharge authority of the efficiency of the measures taken;
opominja izvršnega direktorja agencije, naj v sodelovanju s službo za notranjo revizijo temeljito preveri, ali se obstoječi postopki za odkrivanje in upravljanje navzkrižja interesov zaposlenih in strokovnjakov učinkovito uporabljajo, ter do 30. junija 2011 organ za podeljevanje razrešnice obvesti o svojih ugotovitvah;
Urges the Agency's Executive Director, in cooperation with the IAS, to undertake a thorough verification of the effective use of the existing procedures regarding the identification and management of conflicts of interest for its staff and experts and to communicate the results to the discharge authority by 30 June 2011;
pričakuje, da bo upravni odbor hitro sprejel akcijski načrt za odpravo pomanjkljivosti v postopkih javnih naročil; zlasti zahteva, da izvršni direktor agencije v sodelovanju s službo za notranjo revizijo in s svojim generalnim direktoratom pripravi ta akcijski načrt, ki bi moral vključevati posebne ukrepe in časovni razpored za izvajanje; pričakuje, da bo agencija do 30. junija 2011 te posebne ukrepe sporočila organu za podeljevanje razrešnice;
Expects the Governing Board swiftly to adopt an action plan to remedy the shortcomings in the procurement procedures; asks, in particular, the Agency's Executive Director, in cooperation with the IAS and the parent directorate-general (DG), to draft this action plan which shall include specific measures and a timetable for implementation; expects the Agency to communicate these specific measures to the discharge authority by 30 June 2011;
poziva agencijo, naj do 30. junija 2011 organ za podeljevanje razrešnice obvesti o sprejetih ukrepih in izboljšavah v zvezi z vsemi temi vprašanji;
Calls on the Agency, therefore, to inform the discharge authority by 30 June 2011 of the measures taken and the improvements made in respect of all these areas of concern;
sporoča, da so druge ugotovitve, ki spremljajo sklep o razrešnici in so horizontalne narave, zbrane v resoluciji z dne 10. maja 2011 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2011)163.
Refers, in respect of the other observations accompanying its Decision on discharge, which are of a horizontal nature, to its resolution of 10 May 2011 Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0163 .
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice za proračunsko leto 2009 ( C7-0228/2010 – 2010/2168(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 10 May 2011 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2009 ( C7-0228/2010 – 2010/2168(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice za proračunsko leto 2009,
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o letnih računovodskih izkazih Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice za proračunsko leto 2009, skupaj z odgovori agencije UL C 338, 14.12.2010, str.
having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Fundamental Rights Agency for the financial year 2009, together with the Agency's replies OJ C 338, 14.12.2010, p.
, in zlasti člena 21 Uredbe,
, and in particular Article 21 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 UL L 357, 3112.2002, str.
having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7-0130/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0130/2011 ),
podeli razrešnico direktorju Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice glede izvrševanja proračuna agencije za proračunsko leto 2009;
Grants the Director of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights discharge in respect of the implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2009;
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 o zaključku poslovnih knjig Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice za proračunsko leto 2009 ( C7-0228/2010 – 2010/2168(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 10 May 2011 on the closure of the accounts of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2009 ( C7-0228/2010 – 2010/2168(DEC) )
odobri zaključek poslovnih knjig Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice za proračunsko leto 2009;
Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2009;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. maja 2011 s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice za proračunsko leto 2009 ( C7-0228/2010 – 2010/2168(DEC) )
European Parliament resolution of 10 May 2011 with observations forming an integral part of its Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2009 ( C7-0228/2010 – 2010/2168(DEC) )
ker je Parlament 5. maja 2010 direktorju Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice podelil razrešnico glede izvrševanja proračuna agencije za proračunsko leto 2008 UL L 252, 25.9.2010, str.
whereas on 5 May 2010 Parliament granted the Director of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights discharge for implementation of the Agency's budget for the financial year 2008 OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p.
spodbudil agencijo, da v svojih načrtih določi cilje SMART in kazalnike RACER, da bi tako bolje ocenila svoje rezultate,
encouraged the Agency to set SMART objectives and RACER indicators in its programming so as to improve assessment of its achievements,
čestital agenciji, ker je sredi leta 2009 začela uvajati programsko opremo za upravljanje proračuna na podlagi dejavnosti, s čimer bodo podani jasni kazalniki o dodeljenih finančnih in človeških virih,
congratulated the Agency on having started in mid-2009 to implement Activity Based Budget software that will provide clear indicators on the financial and human resources allocated,
ugotovil, da je urad OLAF leta 2008 začel preiskavo agencije in jo leta 2009 zaključil brez nadaljnjih ukrepov,
noted that, having opened its investigation concerning the Agency in 2008, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) closed it in 2009 with no further action,
ker je proračun agencije za proračunsko leto 2009 znašal 17 000 000 EUR, kar je za 13,3 % več kot v proračunskem letu 2008;
whereas the budget of the Agency for 2009 was EUR 17 000 000, which is an increase of 13,3 % on the financial year 2008,
ugotavlja, da bi morala razrešnica za izvrševanje proračuna urada bolj temeljiti na njeni uspešnosti poslovanja med celotnim letom.
Notes that the discharge for the implementation of the budget for the Agency should be further based on its performance throughout the year.
2. odločno poziva agencijo, naj izboljša načrtovanje proračuna in zaposlovanja, da se odpravi pomanjkanje doslednosti med proračunskimi napovedmi in napovedmi zaposlovanja; dejansko potrjuje ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, da je agencija povečala svoj operativni proračun za 38 % s prenosom 1 900 000 EUR iz Naslova I (osebje) v Naslov III (operativne dejavnosti) zaradi zamud pri zaposlovanju in zaradi financiranja operativnih dejavnosti, ki niso bile predvidene v začetnem proračunu; je ne glede na to seznanjen z zunanjimi dejavniki (kot je imenovanje novega direktorja in dokončanje pomembne okvirne pogodbe, ki jo je pripravila Komisija); 3.
2.Urges the Agency to improve its budgetary and recruitment planning in order to redress the lack of consistency between its budgetary and staff forecasting; acknowledges, in fact, the Court of Auditors’ observation that the Agency increased its operating budget by 38 %, transferring EUR 1 900 000 from Title I (staff) to Title III (operational activities) as a result of delays in recruitment and in order to finance operational activities not envisaged in the initial budget; takes note, nevertheless, of the external factors (such as appointment of a new Director and finalisation of an important framework contract launched by the Commission); 3.
poziva agencijo, naj napreduje pri zagotavljanju realističnega ocenjevanja javnih naročil, kolikor je to mogoče; ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče pravzaprav poročalo o tem vprašanju v zvezi z dodelitvijo treh okvirnih pogodb v skupnem znesku 2 575 000 EUR; zlasti poudarja, da so se v teh treh primerih finančne ponudbe precej razlikovale tako pri cenah na enoto kot pri ocenah ponudnikov, koliko delovnih dni na osebo je potrebnih za izvedbo istega scenarija;
Calls on the Agency to make progress in ensuring, as far as possible, a realistic evaluation of tenders; notes, in fact, that the Court of Auditors reported on this issue in respect of the award of three framework contracts of a total amount of EUR 2 575 000; stresses, in particular, that in these three cases the financial offers differed considerably in both unit prices and the tenderers’ estimates of the number of man-days necessary for the implementation of the same scenario;
pozdravlja namen agencije, da izboljša načrtovanje in spremljanje svojih pogodb, s čimer bo v prihodnje preprečila pomanjkljivosti, na katere je opozorilo Računsko sodišče; zato poziva agencijo, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvesti o sprejetih ukrepih v zvezi s tem;
Welcomes the Agency's resolution to improve the programming and monitoring of its contracts in order to avoid, in the future, the deficiencies reported by the Court of Auditors; calls, accordingly, on the Agency to inform the discharge authority of the action taken in this respect;