natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pri zagotavljanju teh informacij bi moral trgovec upoštevati posebne potrebe potrošnikov, ki so posebej ranljivi zaradi svoje duševne, fizične ali psihološke hibe, starosti ali lahkovernosti na način, ki ga trgovec lahko razumno predvidi.
In providing that information, the trader should take into account the specific needs of consumers who are particularly vulnerable because of their mental, physical or psychological infirmity, age or credulity in a way which the trader could reasonably be expected to foresee.
Informacije, zagotovljene potrošniku, bi morale biti obvezne in se jih ne bi smelo spreminjati.
The information to be provided to the consumer should be mandatory and should not be altered.
Kljub temu, bi morali imeti pogodbeni strani možnost, da se izrecno dogovorita o spremembi vsebine naknadno sklenjene pogodbe, na primer glede dostave.
Nevertheless, the contracting parties should be able to expressly agree to change the content of the contract subsequently concluded, for instance the arrangements for delivery.
teh primerih
such cases
mora trgovec izpolnjevati minimalni sklop zahtev po informacijah in potrošnika napotiti k drugemu viru informacij, na primer z zagotovitvijo brezplačne telefonske številke ali povezave na spletno stran trgovca, na kateri so ustrezne informacije neposredno in preprosto dostopne.
the trader should comply with a minimum set of information requirements and refer the consumer to another source of information, for instance by providing a toll free telephone number or a hypertext link to a webpage of the trader where the relevant information is directly available and easily accessible
Kadar trgovec ne more naprej na razumen način izračunati stroškov vračila blaga, na primer, ker trgovec sam ne ponuja organizacije vračila blaga, mora ta podati izjavo, da bodo ti stroški plačljivi in da bodo morda visoki, skupaj z razumno oceno najvišjih stroškov, ki lahko temelji na stroških dostave potrošniku.
Where the cost of returning the goods cannot reasonably be calculated in advance by the trader, for example because the trader does not offer to arrange for the return of the goods himself, the trader should provide a statement that such a cost will be payable, and that this cost may be high, along with a reasonable estimation of the maximum cost, which could be based on the cost of delivery to the consumer.
da se prepriča o naravi
the nature
in delovanju blaga.
and functioning of the goods.
V primeru pogodb, sklenjenih zunaj poslovnih prostorov, bi potrošnik moral imeti pravico do odstopa od pogodbe zaradi morebitnega elementa presenečenja in/ali psihološkega pritiska.
Concerning off-premises contracts, the consumer should have the right of withdrawal because of the potential surprise element and/or psychological pressure.
Z odpovedjo pogodbe bi morale prenehati veljati obveznosti pogodbenih strank glede izvajanja pogodbe.
Withdrawal from the contract should terminate the obligations of the contracting parties to perform the contract.
V primeru spletnih pogodb bi morala spletna mesta za poslovanje najkasneje na začetku postopka naročanja jasno in razločno navesti, ali obstajajo kakršne koli omejitve za dostavo in katere so sprejete oblike plačila.
In the case of online contracts, trading websites should indicate clearly and legibly at the latest at the beginning of the ordering process whether any delivery restrictions apply and which means of payment are accepted.
Pomembno je zagotoviti, da lahko pri pogodbah na daljavo, ki so sklenjene prek spletne strani, potrošnik v celoti prebere in razume glavne elemente pogodbe, preden odda naročilo.
It is important to ensure for distance contracts concluded through websites that the consumer is able to fully read and understand the main elements of the contract before placing his order.
Zato je potrebna določba, po kateri bi morali ti elementi biti vidni blizu mesta potrditve oddaje naročila.
To that end, provision should be made for those elements to be displayed in the close vicinity of the confirmation requested for placing the order.
Treba je tudi zagotoviti, da v teh primerih potrošnik lahko ugotovi, v katerem trenutku prevzame obveznost plačila trgovcu.
It is also important to ensure that, in such situations, the consumer is able to determine the moment at which he assumes the obligation to make a payment to the trader.
Zato je treba potrošnikovo pozornost z nedvoumno formulacijo usmeriti predvsem k dejstvu, da oddaja naročila zajema obveznost plačila trgovcu.
Therefore, the consumer's attention should specifically be drawn, through an unambiguous formulation, to the fact that placing the order entails the obligation to make a payment to the trader.
Sedanji odstopni roki se razlikujejo med državami članicami ter med pogodbami na daljavo in pogodbami, sklenjenimi zunaj poslovnih prostorov, kar povzroča pravno negotovost in stroške usklajevanja.
The current varying lengths of the withdrawal periods both between the Member States and for distance and off-premises contracts cause legal uncertainty and compliance costs.
Za vse pogodbe na daljavo in pogodbe, sklenjene zunaj poslovnih prostorov, je treba uporabljati enoten odstopni rok.
The same withdrawal period should apply to all distance and off-premises contracts.
V primeru pogodb o opravljanju storitev bi se moral odstopni rok izteči štirinajst dni po sklenitvi pogodbe.
In the case of services contracts, the withdrawal period should expire 14 days from the conclusion of a contract.
V primeru prodajne pogodbe bi se moral odstopni rok izteči štirinajst dni potem, ko potrošnik ali tretja stran, ki ni ponudnik poštnih storitev in ga imenuje potrošnik, fizično prevzame blago, medtem ko bi moral potrošnik imeti možnost odstopa že pred dostavo blaga.
In the case of sales contracts, the withdrawal period should expire 14 days from the day when the consumer or a third party other than the carrier and indicated by the consumer acquires physical possession of the goods, while the consumer should be able to exercise the right to withdraw before the receipt of goods.
Če potrošnik več kosov blaga naroči z enkratnim naročilom, vendar se blago dostavi ločeno, se odstopni rok začne, ko potrošnik pridobi fizično materialno posest zadnjega kosa blaga.
Where multiple goods are ordered by the consumer in one order but are delivered separately, the withdrawal period should start when the consumer acquires physical possession of the last good.
Kadar se blago dostavi v več pošiljkah ali kosih, naj odstopni rok začne teči z dnem, ko potrošnik pridobi materialno posest zadnje pošiljke ali kosa.
Where goods are delivered in multiple lots or pieces, the withdrawal period should begin from the day on which the consumer acquires the material possession of the last lot or piece.
Da se zagotovi pravna varnost,
In order to
je primerno, da se Uredba Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 z dne 3. junija 1971 o določitvi pravil glede rokov, datumov in časovnih omejitev UL L 124, 8.6.1971, str.
ensure legal certainty, it is appropriate that Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits OJ L 124, 8.6.1971, p.
uporablja pri izračunu rokov iz te direktive.
should apply to the calculation of the periods contained in this Directive.
Če rok, izražen v dnevih, začne teči v trenutku, ko se zgodi nek dogodek ali se izvrši neko dejanje, bi moralo veljati, da se dan, ko se ta dogodek zgodi ali ko se to dejanje izvrši, pri računanju zadevnega roka ne upošteva.
Where a period expressed in days is to be calculated from the moment at which an event occurs or an action takes place, the day during which that event occurs or that action takes place should not be considered as falling within the period in question.
Določbe o pravici do odstopa ne bi smele posegati v zakonodajo in predpise držav članic v zvezi z odpovedjo ali neizvršljivostjo pogodbe niti v potrošnikovo pravico, da svoje pogodbene obveznosti izpolni pred rokom, določenim v pogodbi.
The provisions relating to the right of withdrawal should be without prejudice to the Member States' laws and regulations governing the termination or non-enforceability of a contract or the possibility for the consumer to fulfil his contractual obligations before the time fixed in the contract.
Če pred sklenitvijo pogodbe, sklenjene na daljavo ali zunaj poslovnih prostorov, potrošnik od trgovca ni prejel
If the trader has not
informacij ▌, bi bilo treba odstopni rok podaljšati.
informed the consumer ▌prior to the conclusion of a distance or off-premises contract, the withdrawal period should be extended.
Različni načini uveljavljanja pravice do odstopa od pogodbe v državah članicah povzročajo stroške
Differences in the ways in which the right of withdrawal is exercised in the Member States have caused costs for
, ki se ukvarjajo s čezmejno prodajo.
selling cross-border.
Z uvedbo usklajenega standardnega odstopnega
The introduction of a harmonised
Potrošniku bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da lahko svobodno odstopi od pogodbe na podlagi lastne izjave, pod pogojem, da je ta izjava za trgovca nedvoumna.
However, the consumer should remain free to withdraw in using his own words, provided that his statement to the trader is unequivocal.
Tej zahtevi bi lahko ustrezalo pismo, telefonski klic ali vračilo blaga z jasno izjavo, dokazno breme glede odpovedi pogodbe v rokih, določenih s to direktivo, pa je na potrošniku.
A letter, a telephone call or returning the goods with a clear statement could meet this requirement, but the burden of proof of having withdrawn within the time limits fixed in the Directive would be incumbent on the consumer.
Izkušnje kažejo, da številni potrošniki in trgovci raje komunicirajo prek spletne strani trgovca, zato bi moral imeti trgovec možnost, da potrošniku da na voljo možnost izpolnjevanja odstopnega obrazca na spletu.
As experience shows that many consumers and traders prefer to communicate via the trader's website, there should be a possibility for the trader to give the consumer the option of filling in a web-based withdrawal form.
V tem primeru mora trgovec
In this case the trader should provide an acknowledgement of receipt
na primer
for instance
po e-pošti nemudoma poslati potrdilo o prejemu.
by e-mail without delay.
Povračilo se ne bi smelo izplačati v obliki bona, razen če se potrošnik s tem izrecno strinja.
The reimbursement should not be made by voucher unless the consumer has expressly agreed.
Če potrošnik izrecno izbere določeno vrsto dostave (na primer hitro dostavo v 24 urah), čeprav je trgovec ponudil skupen in splošno sprejemljiv način dostave, ki bi povzročil nižje stroške, bi moral potrošnik plačati razliko v stroških med tema dvema načinoma dostave.
If the consumer expressly chooses a certain type of delivery (for instance 24-hour express delivery), although the trader had offered a common and generally acceptable type of delivery which would have incurred lower delivery costs, the consumer should bear the difference in costs between these two types of delivery.
Na primer, potrošnik lahko samo pomeri oblačilo, ne sme pa ga nositi.
For example, the consumer should only try on a garment and should not be allowed to wear it.
Potrošnik bi zato moral v odstopnem roku z blagom ravnati skrbno in ga tako tudi pregledati.
Consequently, the consumer should handle and inspect the goods with due care during the withdrawal period.
Določbe člena 14 naj ne bi spodbujale potrošnika, da ne izkoristi pravice do odstopa od pogodbe.
The provisions of Article 14 should not discourage the consumer from benefiting from his right of withdrawal.
dneh po tem, ko je trgovca obvestil o svoji odločitvi, da odstopi od pogodbe.
days after having informed the trader about his decision to withdraw.
V primerih, ko trgovec ali potrošnik ne izpolnjujeta obveznosti glede uveljavljanja pravice do odstopa od pogodbe, bi se morale v skladu s členom 24 uporabiti kazni, določene z nacionalno zakonodajo, ter predpisi pogodbenega prava.
In situations where the trader or the consumer does not fulfil the obligations connected with the exercise of the right of withdrawal, penalties provided for by national legislation in accordance with Article 24 should apply as well as contract law provisions.
Obstajati bi morale določene izjeme
exceptions from the right of withdrawal
od pravice do odstopa
should exist,
Pravica do odstopa od pogodbe
right of withdrawal
neprimerna zaradi,
be inappropriate
To velja
the case
Potrošnik bi moral imeti pravico do odstopa od pogodbe tudi, če je zaprosil za opravilo storitev pred koncem odstopnega roka.
On the one hand, the consumer should benefit from his withdrawal right even in case he has asked for the provision of services before the end of the withdrawal period.
Če potrošnik uveljavlja pravico do odstopa od pogodbe, pa bi bilo treba zagotoviti, da trgovec prejme ustrezno plačilo za že opravljeno storitev.
On the other hand, if the consumer does exercise his right of withdrawal, the trader should be assured to be adequately paid for the service he has provided.
Tržna vrednost je določena glede na ceno enakovrednih storitev, ki so jih v času sklenitve pogodbe izvedli drugi trgovci.
The market value is defined by comparing the price of an equivalent service performed by other traders at the time of the conclusion of the contract.
Potrošnik bi zato moral za opravljanje storitev zaprositi pred koncem odstopnega roka, in sicer v primeru pogodbe, sklenjene na daljavo, z izrecno podajo posebne zahteve, v primeru pogodbe, sklenjene zunaj poslovnih prostorov, pa na trajnem nosilcu podatkov.
Therefore the consumer should request the provision of services before the end of the withdrawal period by making this specific request expressly in the case of distance contracts or on a durable medium in the case of off-premises contracts.
Podobno bi trgovec moral potrošnika prek trajnega nosilca podatkov obvestiti o vseh obveznostih glede plačila stroških, sorazmernih z že opravljenimi storitvami.
Similarly, the trader should inform the consumer on a durable medium of any obligation to pay the proportionate costs for the service already provided.
Za pogodbe, katerih predmet je tako blago kot storitve, bi morala pravila iz te direktive o vračilu blaga veljati za vse vidike v zvezi z blagom, za vidike v zvezi s storitvami pa bi moral veljati sistem odškodnin za storitve.
For contracts having as their object both goods and services, the rules provided for in this Directive on the return of goods should apply to the goods aspects and the compensation regime for services should apply to the services aspects.
sporov s trgovci se nanašajo na dobavo blaga, vključno z blagom, ki se med prevozom izgubi ali poškoduje, ter poznimi
of disputes with traders are about delivery of goods, including goods getting lost or damaged during transport and late
delnimi dobavami.
partial delivery.
Zato je primerno pojasniti in uskladiti nacionalna pravila o
Therefore it is appropriate to clarify and harmonise the national rules on
tem, kdaj bi se dostava morala izvesti.
when delivery should occur.
Kraj in način dostave ter pravila o določitvi pogojev glede prenosa lastništva nad blagom in trenutka tega prenosa bi morala ostati predmet nacionalne zakonodaje, zato ta direktiva nanje ne bi smela vplivati.
The place and modalities of delivery and the rules concerning the determination of the conditions for the transfer of the ownership of the goods and the moment at which such transfer takes place, should remain subject to national law and therefore should not be affected by this Directive.
Ta pravila bi morala vključevati možnost, da potrošnik tretji osebi dovoli, da v njegovem imenu fizično prevzame blago ali nadzor nad njim.
These rules should include the possibility for the consumer to allow a third party to acquire on his behalf the physical possession or control of the goods.
je blago lahko dostavljeno na različne načine,
, the delivery of goods can take place in various ways
takoj ali na kasnejši datum
, either immediately or at a later date.
Pravila glede zapoznele dostave bi morala upoštevati tudi blago, ki je proizvedeno ali nabavljeno posebej za potrošnika in ga trgovec ne more ponovno uporabiti brez znatne izgube.
The rule regarding the late delivery should also take into account goods to be manufactured or acquired specially for the consumer which cannot be reused by the trader without considerable loss.
Zato bi moralo biti v tej direktivi pravilo, ki trgovcu v nekaterih okoliščinah zagotavlja dodatno upravičeno zamudo.
Therefore, a rule which grants an additional reasonable delay to the trader in certain circumstances should be provided for in this Directive.
Če trgovec blaga ni dostavil v času, dogovorjenem s potrošnikom, bi moral potrošnik pred odpovedjo pogodbe trgovca opozoriti, naj blago dostavi v razumnem dodatnem roku, in imeti pravico do odpovedi pogodbe.
When the trader has failed to deliver the goods in the time agreed with the consumer, before the termination of the contract, the consumer should call upon the trader to make the delivery within a reasonable additional period and be entitled to terminate the contract.
To pravilo pa se ne bi smelo uporabiti, če trgovec odkloni dostavo blaga z nedvoumno izjavo.
However, this rule should not apply when the trader has refused to deliver the goods in an unequivocal statement.
Ne bi se smelo uporabiti v posebnih okoliščinah, denimo, ko je dostavni rok bistven, kot je na primer dostava poročne obleke pred poroko.
Neither should it apply in certain circumstances where the delivery period is essential such as, for example, a wedding dress which should be delivered before the wedding.
Prav tako se ne bi smelo uporabiti v okoliščinah, ko potrošnik trgovca obvesti, da je dostava na določen dan bistvenega pomena.
Nor should it apply in circumstances where the consumer informs the trader that delivery on a specified date is essential.
Za ta namen lahko potrošnik uporabi kontaktne podatke, dane v skladu s to direktivo.
For this purpose, the consumer may use the contact details given in accordance with this Directive.
Če trgovec v teh posebnih primerih blaga ne dostavi pravočasno, lahko potrošnik pogodbo odpove takoj po izteku prvotno dogovorjenega roka za dostavo.
In these specific cases, if the trader fails to deliver the goods on time, the consumer is entitled to terminate the contract immediately after the expiry of the delivery period initially agreed.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v nacionalne določbe glede načina, na katerega potrošnik trgovca obvesti o nameri, da pogodbo odpove.
This Directive should be without prejudice to national provisions on the way the consumer should notify the trader of his will to terminate the contract.
Poleg pravice potrošnika po tej direktivi, da pogodbo odpove, če trgovec ni izpolnil obveznosti glede dostave, lahko potrošnik v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo uporabi tudi druga pravna sredstva, kot so dopustitev podaljšanja roka dostave, zahteva za izvršitev pogodbe, zadržanje plačila in povrnitev škode.
In addition to the consumer's right to terminate the contract where the trader has failed to fulfil his obligations to deliver in accordance with this Directive, the consumer may, in accordance with the applicable national law, have recourse to other remedies, such as to allow an additional time for delivery, enforce the performance of the contract, withhold payment, and seek damages.
bi morale imeti države članice možnost, da ob upoštevanju potrebe po spodbujanju konkurenčnosti in uporabe učinkovitih plačilnih instrumentov trgovcem prepovedo ali omejijo pravico do zaračunavanja nadomestil potrošnikom.
, Member States should be able to prohibit or limit traders' right to request charges from consumers taking into account the need to encourage competition and promote the use of efficient payment instruments.
Trgovcem bi moralo biti v vsakem primeru prepovedano, da potrošnikom zaračunavajo stroške, ki presegajo stroške, ki jih trgovec nosi za uporabo določenega načina plačila.
In any event, traders should be prohibited from charging consumers fees that exceed the cost borne by the trader for the use of a certain means of payment.
Če potrošniku blago dostavi trgovec, bi bil trenutek prenosa tveganja v primeru izgube ali poškodbe lahko sporen.
When the goods are dispatched by the trader to the consumer, the moment of the transfer of risk could be, in case of loss or damage, a source of disputes.
Zato bi bilo v to direktivo treba vstaviti določbo, ki zagotavlja, da je potrošnik zaščiten pred vsakršnim tveganjem izgube ali poškodbe blaga, preden ga fizično ne prevzame.
Therefore a rule which provides that the consumer should be protected against any risk of loss or damage of the goods occurring before he has acquired the physical possession of the goods should be inserted in this Directive.
Potrošnik bi moral biti zaščiten med prevozom, ki ga organizira ali izvede trgovec, tudi če potrošnik izmed možnostmi, ki jih je ponudil trgovec, izbere poseben način dostave blaga.
The consumer should be protected during a transport arranged or carried out by the trader, even where the consumer has chosen a particular delivery method from a range of options offered by the trader.
Ta direktiva pa se ne bi smela uporabljati za pogodbe, ki določajo, da potrošnik sam prevzame dostavo blaga ali zanjo zaprosi prevoznika.
On the other hand, this Directive should not apply to contracts where it is up to the consumer to take delivery of the goods himself or to ask a carrier to take delivery.
V zvezi s trenutkom prenosa tveganja bi za potrošnika moralo veljati, da je blago fizično prevzel, ko ga prejme.
Regarding the moment of the transfer of the risk, a consumer should be considered to have acquired the physical possession of the goods when he has received them.
Osebe ali organizacije, ki imajo po nacionalni zakonodaji upravičen interes, da varujejo pogodbene pravice potrošnikov, morajo imeti na voljo pravna sredstva za začetek postopka pred sodiščem ali pri upravnem organu, ki je pristojen za odločanje o pritožbah ali za začetek ustreznega postopka.
Persons or organisations regarded under national law as having a legitimate interest in protecting consumer contractual rights should be afforded legal remedies for initiating proceedings, either before a court or before an administrative authority which is competent to decide upon complaints or to initiate appropriate legal proceedings.
Potrošnik ne sme biti prikrajšan za varstvo, ki ga zagotavlja ta direktiva.
The consumer should not be deprived of the protection granted by this Directive.
Kadar se za pogodbo uporablja zakonodaja tretje države, bi bilo treba uporabiti Uredbo (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja (Rim I)
Where the law applicable to the contract is that of a third country, Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)
preučila najprimernejši način za zagotovitev, da so vsi potrošniki seznanjeni s svojimi pravicami na prodajnem mestu.
will look into the most appropriate way to ensure that all consumers are made aware of their rights at the point of sale.
Ker so bili z Direktivo 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu („Direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah“) UL L 149, 11.6.2005, str.
Since inertia selling, which consists of unsolicited supplies of goods or services to consumers, is prohibited by Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p.
že ureja nenaročeno obveščanje in zagotavlja visoko raven varstva potrošnikov.
already regulates unsolicited communications and provides for a high level of consumer protection.
Zadevne določbe s tega področja iz ▌Direktive 97/7/ES bi bilo
The corresponding provisions on the same issue contained in ▌Directive 97/7/EC should
treba črtati.
be deleted.