natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 8. marca 2011 o inovativnem financiranju na globalni in evropski ravni odobril uvedbo davka na finančne transakcije, ki bi lahko prispeval k reševanju izredno škodljivih vzorcev trgovanja na finančnih trgih, kot so nekatere kratkoročne in samodejne visokofrekvenčne transakcije, ter k omejitvi špekulacij,
whereas, in its resolution of 8 March 2011 on innovative financing at global and European level, the European Parliament approved the introduction of a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), which ‘could help to tackle the highly damaging trading patterns in financial markets, such as some short-term and automated high-frequency trade transactions, and curb speculation’,
meni, da so prihodnji izzivi – demografski, podnebne spremembe ali oskrba z energijo – področja, na katerih lahko Evropska unija, ki je veliko več kot zgolj skupek držav članic, najbolje pokaže svojo dodano vrednost;
Believes that the challenges ahead -whether demography, climate change or energy supply - are areas where the European Union, which is much more than the sum of its Member States, can demonstrate its added value;
ugotavlja, da so trenutna kriza in resne omejitve javne porabe državam članicam otežile nadaljnji napredek na področju rasti, večje konkurenčnosti, v prizadevanjih za gospodarsko in socialno zbliževanje ter njihovo polno sodelovanje na notranjem trgu; je trdno prepričan, da je rešitev krize več, in ne manj Evrope;
Notes that the current crisis and severe constraints in public spending have made it more difficult for Member States to progress further in terms of growth, greater competitiveness, the pursuit of economic and social convergence and to participate fully in the internal market; strongly believes, that the solution to the crisis is more and not less Europe;
meni, da „trajnostna sredstva za Evropsko Unijo“ pomenijo predvsem, da si je treba na novo zamisliti „sistem virov“ za proračun EU, da bi tako trenutne nacionalne prispevke nadomestili z resnično evropskimi viri;
Considers that ‘Sustainable resources for the European Union’ means first and foremost to rethink the ‘resource system’ of the EU-Budget in order to replace the current national contributions with genuinely European resources;
meni, da nedavni dogodki dokazujejo, da potrebuje euroobmočje smelejše gospodarsko upravljanje in da je monetarni steber brez socialnega in gospodarskega stebra obsojen na propad; meni, da je za Unijo bistveno, da se okrepi njen sistem gospodarskega upravljanja, da bi tako zagotovili izvajanje strategije EU2020 (ponovno vzpostavili in obvarovali dolgoročne stopnje gospodarske rasti), preprečili ponovitev trenutne krize in obvarovali evropsko povezovanje;
Considers that the recent events show that the Euro zone is in need of bolder economic governance and that a monetary pillar without a social and economic pillar is doomed to fail; considers it essential for the Union to reinforce its system of economic governance in order to ensure the implementation of the EU2020 strategy (restore and to safeguard long-term economic growth rates), to prevent a repetition of the current crisis and to safeguard the European project;
Gradnja družbe znanja
Building a knowledge-based society
poudarja, da je kriza osvetlila strukturne izzive, s katerimi se mora soočiti večina gospodarstev držav članic: nižja produktivnost od optimalne, visoka stopnja javnega dolga, veliki proračunski primanjkljaji, strukturna brezposelnost, trajne ovire na notranjem trgu, nizka mobilnost delovne sile, zastarelo pojmovanje znanja in veščin, ki prispevajo k nizki rasti; poudarja, da je treba vlagati na ključna področja, kot so izobraževanje, raziskave in inovacije, da bi tako premostili te strukturne izzive, in poudarja pomen obrnitve trenda upadanja javnih naložb;
Points out that the crisis has highlighted the structural challenges which most of the Member States' economies must face: suboptimal productivity, high levels of public debt, large fiscal deficits, structural unemployment, persistent barriers in the internal market, low labour mobility and outdated notions for skills, contributing to poor growth; underlines the need for investments in key areas such as education, research and innovation, in order to overcome these structural challenges and stresses the importance to reverse the trend of falling public investments;
opozarja, da je glede na trenutna gibanja naložb možno, da bo do leta 2025 vodilno vlogo v znanstvenem in tehnološkem razvoju prevzela Azija; vendar pa opozarja, da te spremembe ne pomenijo le velikih izzivov, ampak tudi priložnosti, kot je skokovita rast izvoznega potenciala EU; ugotavlja, da Unija zaostaja na področju akademskega in poklicnega izobraževanja na terciarni ravni, saj se le 30 evropskih univerz uvršča med najboljših 100 v svetovnem merilu; poudarja, da Evropa zaostaja tudi v tekmi na področju znanja in veščin, in opozarja na dejstvo, da bo do leta 2020 16 milijonov več delovnih mest, za katera bo potrebna visoka izobrazba, medtem ko se bo povpraševanje po znanju in veščinah na nizki izobrazbeni ravni zmanjšalo za 12 milijonov delovnih mest;
Recalls that on current investment trends, Asia may by 2025 be at the forefront of scientific and technological developments; recalls however that these changes not only represents huge challenges but also opportunities, such as a sharp growth in export potential for the EU; notes that in tertiary-level academic and vocational education, the Union are lagging behind as only about 30 European universities rank amongst the world's top 100; stresses that Europe is also falling behind in the skills race and draws attention to the fact that by 2020, 16 million more jobs will require high qualifications while the demand for low skills will drop by 12 million jobs;
Preprečevanje brezposelnosti
Combating unemployment
meni, da je eden od velikih izzivov Evropske unije ohranjanje konkurenčnosti, povečanje rasti in boj proti visoki brezposelnosti, za izboljšanje zaposlovanja pa je bistvenega pomena osredotočenost na ustrezno delujoče trge dela in socialne pogoje, spodbujanje dostojnega dela, zagotavljanje pravic delavcev po vsej Evropi ter izboljšanje delovnih pogojev in zmanjševanje revščine;
Considers that one of the great challenges facing the European Union is that of maintaining its competitiveness, increasing growth, combating high unemployment, focusing on properly functioning labour markets and on social conditions to improve employment performance, promoting decent work, guarantee workers' rights throughout Europe as well as working conditions and reducing poverty;
vztraja, da Unija mora rešiti demografski izziv; ugotavlja, da bodo zaradi manjšega obsega delovno aktivnega prebivalstva in večjega deleža upokojencev sistemi socialnega varstva Unije in njena gospodarska konkurenčnost dodatno obremenjeni;
Insists that the Union must tackle its demographic challenge; notes that the combination of a smaller working population and a higher share of retired people will place additional strains on its welfare systems and its economic competitiveness;
Podnebne spremembe in omejenost virov
Climate and resource challenges
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker bo povečanje števila svetovnega prebivalstva s 6 na 9 milijard zaostrilo svetovno konkurenco za naravne vire in dodatno obremenilo globalno in lokalno okolje; ugotavlja, da se bo povpraševanje po hrani do leta 2050 verjetno povečalo za 70 % in da negospodarna in netrajnostna uporaba ter upravljanje surovin in potrošnih dobrin državljane izpostavlja škodljivi konkurenci med hrano, ohranjanjem narave in proizvodnjo energije kot tudi dragim cenovnim pretresom; to ima lahko resne posledice za industrijo, kar zadeva poslovne priložnosti, vključno z omejenim dostopom do surovin, kar ogroža ekonomsko varnost in vpliva na podnebne spremembe; zato poudarja, da mora EU takoj sprejeti ukrepe in voditi proces prehoda na gospodarstvo, ki bo temeljilo na trajnostnih virih;
Is concerned that the expansion of the world population from 6 to 9 billion will intensify global competition for natural resources and put additional pressure on the global and local environment; notes that demand for food is likely to grow by 70 % by 2050 and that the inefficient and unsustainable use and management of raw materials and commodities exposes citizens to harmful competition between food, nature preservation and energy production, as well as costly price shocks; it can have also severe consequences for industry with regard to business opportunities, including restrictions on access to raw materials, threatening economic security and contributing to climate change; stresses therefore the need for the EU to immediately take action and lead the process towards an economy based on sustainable use of resources;
opozarja na rastočo svetovno porabo energije in na dejstvo, da se bo odvisnost od uvoza energije povečevala, tako da bo leta 2050 Unija z uvozom krila dve tretjini svojih potreb, če ne bomo primerno spremenili sedanjih energetskih politik, in če EU in države članice ne bodo okrepile prizadevanj za razvoj lastnih obnovljivih virov energije in za izrabo svojega potenciala energijske učinkovitosti, pri čemer morajo v celoti upoštevati obveznosti EU na področju energije in podnebnih sprememb ter varnostne vidike; opozarja, da bo nestabilnost cen in negotovost pri preskrbi še zaostrila politična nestabilnost v državah, bogatih z viri energije; zato poziva, naj se diverzificirajo dobavne poti in trgovinski partnerji;
Draws attention to the increasing global consumption of energy and to the fact that dependence on energy imports is set to increase, with the Union importing by 2050 nearly two thirds of its needs if current energy policies are not adequately altered and if the EU and Member States do not increase efforts to develop their own renewable energy sources and to realize their energy efficiency potential, taking full account of the EU's energy and climate commitments as well as safety aspects; warns that price volatility and supply uncertainties will also be exacerbated by political volatility in energy-rich countries; asks therefore to diversify supply routes and trading partners;
podpira idejo, da bi vse financiranje EU skupaj moralo pripeljati do izboljšanja splošnega stanja evropskega okolja in v njegovem okviru do zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov, ki bi vsaj ustrezalo ciljem sedanje zakonodaje EU; zato predlaga, da se pozitivni in negativni učinki porabe sredstev EU za podnebje in okolje analizirajo zbirno;
Supports the idea that the ensemble of all EU funding taken together should lead to an improvement in the general state of the European environment hereunder a reduction in GHG emissions that at least corresponds to the objectives in the present EU legislation; proposes therefore that positive and negative climate and environment effects of the spending of EU-funds should be analysed on aggregated levels;
meni, da je globalizacija z odpravo meja med notranjimi in zunanjimi oblikami svobode, pravice in varnosti okrepila občutek ranljivosti; je prepričan, da soočanje z varnostnimi izzivi 21. stoletja ob hkratnem varstvu temeljnih pravic in osebnih svoboščin zato zahteva globalne in vnaprejšnje odzive, ki jih lahko zagotovi le igralec velikosti Unije; je prepričan, da je zunanja razsežnost varnosti EU tesno povezana z demokracijo, pravno državo in dobrim upravljanjem tretjih držav ter da ima EU posebno odgovornost, da k temu prispeva;
Takes the view that globalisation has increased a sense of vulnerability by dissolving the boundaries between internal and external forms of freedom, justice and security; is convinced that addressing 21st century security challenges while safeguarding fundamental rights and personal freedoms therefore requires global and anticipatory responses, which only an actor the size of the Union can provide; is convinced that the external dimension of EU security is closely connected to democracy, rule of law and good governance of third countries and that the EU has a special responsibility to contribute to this;
je prepričan, da mora Unija kot pomembna politična, gospodarska in trgovinska sila v celoti prevzeti svojo vlogo na mednarodnem prizorišču; opozarja, da ponuja Lizbonska pogodba nova orodja za učinkovitejše uveljavljanje evropskih interesov in vrednot v svetu; poudarja, da bo Unija prinesla dodano vrednost na globalnem prizorišču in vplivala na globalne politične odločitve le v primeru, če bo delovala kolektivno; vztraja, da bo okrepljeno zunanjo zastopanost treba dopolniti z močnejšim notranjim usklajevanjem;
Is convinced that the Union, as a major political, economic and trading power, must play its full role on the international stage; recalls that the Treaty of Lisbon gives new tools to better project European interests and values worldwide; emphasises that the Union will add value on the global scene and influence global policy decisions only if it acts collectively; insists that stronger external representation will need to go hand in hand with stronger internal co-ordination;
je prepričan, da mora krepitev občutka javne poistovetenosti z Unijo postati gibalo kolektivnega delovanja; meni, da je „dobro upravljanje“ daleč najmočnejše sredstvo, s katerim lahko Unija zagotovi stalno zavezanost in udejstvovanje svojih državljanov;
Is convinced that strengthening the sense of public ownership of the Union must become a driving force of collective action; believes that delivering ‘good governance’ is by far the Union's most powerful means of ensuring the continuous commitment and engagement of its citizens;
Evropska dodana vrednost in stroški neprisotnosti Evrope
European added value and the cost of non-Europe
poudarja, da je glavni namen proračunskih odhodkov EU ustvariti evropsko dodano vrednost z združevanjem sredstev, delovanjem kot katalizator in nudenjem ekonomije obsega, pozitivnimi čezmejnimi učinki in učinki prelivanja ter tako učinkoviteje prispevati k učinkovitejšemu ali hitrejšemu doseganju sprejetih skupnih političnih ciljev in zmanjšanju nacionalnih odhodkov; opozarja, da se je načeloma treba izogniti vsakemu podvajanju odhodkov ali prekrivanju dodeljenih sredstev v različnih proračunskih vrsticah, in da mora biti cilj porabe sredstev EU vedno ustvarjanje večje vrednosti od skupne porabe posameznih držav članic in meni, da je pravilno uporabljen večletni finančni okvir zelo pomembno orodje za dolgoročno načrtovanje evropskega projekta, ob upoštevanju evropske perspektive in dodane vrednosti Unije;
Underlines that the main purpose of EU budgetary spending is to create European added value (EAV) by pooling resources, acting as a catalyst and offering economies of scale, positive transboundary and spill-over effects thus contributing to the achievement of agreed common policy targets more effectively or faster and reducing national expenditure; recalls that, as a principle, any duplication of spending and overlapping of allocated funds in various budget lines must be avoided and that EU spending must always aim at creating greater value than the aggregated individual spending of Member States; considers that the multi-annual financial framework, rightly used, constitutes a very important instrument for long-term planning of the European project by taking into account the European perspective and added value of the Union;
opozarja, da bi utegnila imeti nekatera področja možnosti za večjo sinergijo in ekonomije obsega: Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje, humanitarna pomoč, natančneje rečeno zmogljivost za hitro odzivanje EU, združevanje obrambnih virov, raziskave, razvoj in inovacije, veliki infrastrukturni projekti (zlasti energetski in prometni) ter nadzor nad finančnim trgom;
Draws attention to the following areas as potential candidates for greater synergy and economies of scale: the European External Action Service, humanitarian aid and more specifically an EU rapid response capability, the pooling of defence resources, research, development and innovation, big infrastructure projects (particularly in the field of energy and transport) and financial market oversight;
meni, da je skupaj s preverjanjem subsidiarnosti v nacionalnih parlamentih, ki je predvideno z Lizbonsko pogodbo, treba v okviru najboljše prakse za vsak zakonodajni predlog, ki je povezan s proračunom, opraviti oceno evropske dodane vrednosti; vendar vztraja pri dejstvu, da je za oceno evropske dodane vrednosti potreben pristop, ki presega preglednice, in da je s politično oceno treba preučiti, ali bo načrtovani ukrep učinkovito in uspešno prispeval k skupnim ciljem EU ter ali bo ustvaril javne dobrine EU; ugotavlja, da glavnih in najpomembnejših elementov evropske dodane vrednosti, kot so mir, stabilnost, svoboda, prost pretok ljudi, blaga, storitev in kapitala, ni mogoče oceniti s številkami;
Considers that, alongside the subsidiarity check through the national parliaments anchored in the Treaty of Lisbon, an assessment of the EAV must be undertaken for each legislative proposal with budgetary relevance as a matter of best practice; insists, however, on the fact that the assessment of EAV needs more than a ‘spreadsheet's approach’ and that a political evaluation needs to examine whether the planned action will contribute efficiently and effectively to common EU objectives and whether it will create EU public goods; notes that the main and most important elements of the EAV, such as peace, stability, freedom, freedom of movement of people, goods, services and capital, cannot be assessed in numerical terms;
poudarja, da je treba dokazati skladnost vseh odhodkov EU z obveznostmi iz Pogodbe, pravnega reda Skupnosti ali s pomembnejšimi cilji politik EU; poudarja, da je evropsko dodano vrednost mogoče ustvariti ne le z odhodki, temveč tudi z evropsko zakonodajo in usklajevanjem nacionalnih politik in politik EU na gospodarskem, fiskalnem, proračunskem in socialnem področju; je prepričan, da je treba v okviru prihodnjega večletnega finančnega okvira okrepiti evropsko dodano vrednost odhodkov; poudarja, da bi moralo financiranje EU, kadar je to mogoče, hkrati prispevati k več kot enemu cilju politik EU (npr. ozemeljska kohezija, prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam, zaščita biotske raznovrstnosti);
Stresses the need to prove all EU spending for consistency with Treaty obligations, the acquis communautaire or major EU policy objectives; highlights that EAV can be generated not only by expenditure, but also by European legislation and by coordination of national and EU policies on economic, fiscal, budgetary and social fields; is convinced that the European Added Value of spending under the future MFF must be enhanced; stresses that EU funding should, wherever possible, contribute to more than one EU policy objective at a time (e.g. territorial cohesion, climate change adaptation, biodiversity protection);
je trdno prepričan, da lahko naložbe na ravni EU privedejo do znatno višjih prihrankov na nacionalni ravni, zlasti na področjih, kjer ima EU nedvomno večjo dodano vrednost kot nacionalni proračuni; je trdno prepričan, da morajo vsa prihodnja pogajanja o proračunu EU temeljiti na načelu evropske dodane vrednosti; zato pozdravlja zavezo Komisije, da sproži celovito analizo „stroškov neprisotnosti Evrope“ za države članice in nacionalne proračune; poziva Komisijo, naj to poročilo objavi pravočasno, da bo omogočila njegovo upoštevanje v procesu pogajanj o naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru;
Is strongly of the opinion that investments at EU level can lead to significantly higher savings at national level, notably in areas where the EU has undeniably more added value than national budgets; strongly believes that the EAV principle should underpin all future negotiations on the EU budget; welcomes, therefore, the Commission's commitment to launch a comprehensive analysis of the ‘costs of non-Europe’ for the Member States and the national budgets; calls on the Commission to publish this report in due time to allow taking it into account during the negotiation process of the next MFF;
poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju med proračunom EU in nacionalnimi proračuni držav članic pri financiranju skupnih političnih prednostnih nalog; ponovno poudarja, da je treba usklajevati porabo javnih sredstev od načrtovanja do izvajanja, da se zagotovijo dodatnost, boljša učinkovitost in prepoznavnost ter večja racionalizacija proračuna EU; meni, da bi moral novi mehanizem za usklajevanje gospodarske in proračunske politike („evropski semester“) odigrati pomembno vlogo pri usklajevanju ciljev politik po vsej Evropi in ciljev EU ter s tem prispevati k doseganju želenih proračunskih sinergij med proračunom EU in nacionalnimi proračuni;
Calls for a better coordination between the EU budget and the Member States' national budgets in financing the common political priorities; reiterates the need to coordinate the spending of public funds from planning to implementation in order to assure complementarity, a better efficiency and visibility, as well as a better streamlining of the EU budget; believes that the new economic and budgetary policy coordination mechanism (the ‘European semester’) should play an important role in aligning the policy targets across Europe and with the EU goals and thus help achieving the desired budgetary synergies between the EU and the national budgets;
meni, da bi izvajanje različnih politik in dejavnosti morala voditi učinkovita in uspešna poraba proračunskih sredstev, medtem ko bi bilo treba načelo evropske dodane vrednosti uporabiti za usmerjanje prihodnjih odločitev o prednostnih nalogah na področju odhodkov;
Considers that, while the principle of EAV should be used to guide future decisions determining priorities in expenditure, the efficient and effective use of appropriations should lead the implementation of different policies and activities;
poudarja, da bi bilo za optimalne rezultate za trajnostno rast in razvoj na terenu, solidarnost in kohezijo treba dati prednost izboljšanju sinergij med vsemi skladi iz proračuna EU, ki vplivajo na gospodarski razvoj, in celostnemu pristopu med različnimi sektorji, razvoju ciljno usmerjenih politik ter, kadar je to primerno, uporabi pogojev, načela „neškodovanja“ in „onesnaževalec plača“, dejavnikov uspeha in kazalnikov učinkovitosti ter rezultatov;
Stresses that in order to achieve optimal results for sustainable growth and development on the ground, solidarity and cohesion; priority should be given to the improvement of synergies between all funds of the EU budget that have an impact on economic development and to an integrated approach between different sectors, the development of result-oriented policies and, where appropriate, the use of conditionalities, the ‘do no harm’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles, success factors and performance and outcome indicators;
opozarja, da je proračun EU v prvi vrsti naložbeni proračun, ki lahko ustvari več naložb iz javnih ali zasebnih virov; meni, da bo pridobivanje dodatnega kapitala ključno za zagotovitev velikih vlaganj, ki so potrebna za dosego političnih ciljev strategije Evropa 2020; zlasti poudarja, da je treba povečati učinek financiranja EU s pritegnitvijo, združevanjem in spodbujanjem (doseganjem učinka vzvoda) javnih in zasebnih finančnih sredstev za infrastrukturo in velike projekte evropskega interesa, ne da bi to ogrožalo konkurenco;
Reminds that the EU budget is primarily an investment budget, which can generate more investment from public or private sources; considers that attracting additional capital will be crucial to reach the significant amounts of investment needed to meet the Europe 2020 policy objectives; emphasises, in particular, the need to maximise the impact of EU funding by mobilising, pooling and leveraging public and private financial resources for infrastructures and large projects of European interest, without distorting competition;